HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-05-18_COUNCIL PACKETWEST SHORE DRIVE STOP SIGN PETITIONS
The residents of West Shore Drive have asked for the specified stop signs because West
Shore Drive:
is treated as a major thoroughfare
is the last open direct path between 66h and 70`h Streets
is a curvy and hilly road
residents have yelled at speeding passing cars and have stood in the road to slow
drivers down, resulting in confrontational situations between motorists and
homeowners
has multiple school bus stops
residents believe the city is waiting for injuries /fatalities to occur before stop signs
will be approved
has an enormous amount of foot and bike traffic
AND STILL HAS DRIVERS THAT CONSISTENTLY SIGNIFICANTLY
EXCEED THE SPEED LIMIT.
Results from the West Shore Drive petition:
40 persons (out of 43 persons approached) supporting a total of five (5)
requested stop signs. Two persons did not support this petition and one
person abstained from signing it. There were ten households that were
not available to speak with (away from home or gone for winter).
THIS MEANS 93% SUPPORT THIS REQUEST.
Results from the Dunberry Lane petition:
24 persons (out of 24 person approached) supported the additional two (2)
requested stop signs.
THIS MEANS 100% SUPPORT THIS REQUEST.
Combined total of two petitions is 64 persons supporting the stop signs (out of
67 persons approached.)
THIS MEANS 96% SUPPORT THIS REQUEST.
Upper Terrace/West Shore Drive intersection:
a significant amount of traffic funnels off of nearby "interior" streets onto Upper
Terrace and ultimately onto West Shore Drive
large long - standing trees obscuring view of traffic
U.S. Postal mailbox at this intersection
cars increasing speed to get over hill from both directions
school bus stop for: Normandale Elementary, Cornelia Elementary,
Southview Middle School and Edina High School
good mid -point for West Shore Drive traffic control equitable with the stop sign
system installed recently at 68th & Cornelia - -will keep the traffic between
66th & 700' Streets from all moving over to West Shore Drive
Dunberry Lane/West Shore Drive intersection:
excessive speed of traffic coming over hill from north direction, and off of
70`h from south direction. There is not enough time - -DUE TO SPEED
OF TRAFFIC - -to safely evaluate crossing West Shore Drive. It's difficult
in a car, and worse on foot or bike. Bicyclists roll through the stop sign
since it's tricky to start up and get enough speed to cross intersection if
a speeding car appears. Children feel forced to run to cross safely, which
is dangerous.
school bus stop for: Cornelia Elementary, Southview Middle School and
Edina High School
would be equitable with Creston's stop sign at the first intersection north of
70th street
would be reasonably placed distance between Upper Terrace/Dunberry along
West Shore Drive, similar to West Shore Drive/Wooddale along Dunberry
Lane.
DVTTTTl1N VnU nTTWRVDDV T A N . ESID NTT
1 L /11Zf %PA11 1% /i\ "\J1 IV LLZ \Z\ -i LL AA 11i t S
The Dunberry Lane residents, as indicated by our signatures below, hereby petition the
Edina City Council, to authorize the installation of an additional two stop signs to create
a four -way stop sign system at the intersection of West Shore Drive and Dunberry Lane.
We are concerned that the continued violation of the legal speed limit of 30 mph .may
likely result in injury or death to one of our neighbors. It is not uncommon to have
vehicles driving on West Shore Drive in speeds significantly in excess of the legal speed
limit, which we feel is dangerous in a. residential neighborhood, in addition to being
illegal.
We hereby direct the Edina City Council to initiate approval and installation of the
aforementioned stop. signs.
NAME ADDRESS
1 ��i3 %G(N (!`T Imo►^ Ir L. � fC.
r
r �
HOME PRONE
9�G -Pau/
Z.�
Z
q'aQ 3201
DATE
/--// y P
r
si
��
5�/' J'
5 1G I9
g
y. a
yl c pAqab��,
dab -.2257
Duaber-ry J-n -7
ZZE
PETITION FOR WEST SHORE. DRIVE RESIDENTS
The West Shore Drive residents and those persons whose property border on
West Shore Drive (Edina, Minnesota), as indicated by our signatures below,
hereby petition the Edina City Council, to authorize the installation.of
1) a.three -way stop sign system at the intersection of West Shore Drive
and Upper Terrace, and
2) an additional two stop signs to create a four -way stop sign system
atAhe intersection of West Shore Drive and Dunberry Lane.
We are concerned that the continued violation of the legal speed limit of
30 -mph may, likely result in injury or death.to one of our neighbors. It is not
uncommon to have vehicles driving on West Shore. Drive in speeds. -
significantlyin excess of the legal speed limit, which we feel is dangerous in-a.,
residential neighborhood, in addition to being illegal.
We hereby direct the Edina City Council to initiate approval and installation
of the aforementioned stop signs.
6 2oS lJs s - 1`_Zte S,,
y�l
D.6
`i7 ov_G✓, 0rJNW-
--------- - - - - --
IWo
�a(oo0 W S - -e,,
Z6: _71FL
,9 ? _g�Z_Y
ZozYl38
7-;13T /sue
SA
zZe
2L4
If
Name Address Home Phone nak
T
lip
72- -IJ7 3 I-IF.
36-
�4pu at 904-6
Yl i; Kai%.
-joy
.������ ��� �.��.� -wry � -�,.
�,�`' z . 6z
Cog'Ol
671-6A %u-t-A ,
qZ9 - 07J-
43- V1W
(,aO 2, w S), 49---
91
��:� wsh �
9a� �g�
p=ly - -q
66 �� � �,�u—
�% 2 7 -.sue � ?
�y /��
680c1 W SAWA—
9ZG -7-7/7
It
Name Ads Home Phone DAk
_ 1�� fly �`i��-�J" v ���`'•�� ��J.LI,J' /! :J%. `YIXJ "OC�� J�j�� /��
ACy
s
kdQ -0 7 -1,4/— g�
�9- A. J�
o e
0
' • ��'<baroMSE�
RESOLUTION
City of Edina
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has participated in the revision and Rule B -
Stormwater Management;
WHEREAS, the revised rule B now appears to more clearly define several water
management issues;
WHEREAS, the many agencies and individuals involved provided a wide scope
viewpoint to develop a more user friendly document or rule;
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is aware of the hearings requirements of instituting
a rule change in terms of time;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina requests that the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District accept the Task Force's recommendation for
revision to Rule B and initiate the public hearing or comment period as soon as
possible.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF EDINA
)SS
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting May 18, 1998, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this May 19th, 1998.
1"AS AllPlAi
y Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 18,1998
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and
are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests
it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in
its normal sequence on the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA - Regular Meeting of May 4,1998
* II. AWARD OF BID - Centennial Lakes South Pond Wall & Pond Liner Imp PL-4
III. PUBLIC WALKWAY IMPROVEMENT - 50th Street Plaza
Rollcall IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 5/14/98 TOTAL: $154,582.72
V. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 4,1998
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of
Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to
close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5
favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second
Read: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final
Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
Rollcall A. FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT - Namron Company LLC. Norman
Bjornnes, 51XX Lincoln Drive. Generally located east of TH 169 & Lincoln
Drive
Agenda/Edina City Council
May 18,1998
Page 2
III. AWARD OF BID
* A. Two (2) Dump Trucks, Public Works
* B. Computer Replacement, Police Department
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Report of May 5, 1998
* B Resolution to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
* C. Donation of Used Dump Truck to Edina Schools
* D. Final Plans and Advertisement for Bids, Imp. No. SS -391 & SS -392
* E. Set Public Hearing Date (6/15/98) Vacation of portion of West 41st Street
V. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VI. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
A. Budget Calendar
X. FINANCE
Rolicall A. Payment of Claims as per Pre -List dated 5/14198 TOTAL: $1101,647.07 and
for confirmation of Payment of Claims as per re -List dated x/8/98 TOTAL:
$298,622.24
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Mon
May 19
SPECIAL ELECTION SD 273 REFERENDA
Mon
May 25
MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Mon
Jun 1
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Jun 15
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER
Fri
Jul 3
INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Mon
Jul 6
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
July 20
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 4, 1998 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
and Chair Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold
and seconded by Commissioner Faust with the exception of Agenda Item HRA I.,
approval of HRA Minutes of April 20, 1998. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 20 1998 APPROVED AS
CHANGED Commissioner Hovland asked the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April
20, 1998, be removed from the Consent Agenda for an amendment to his comments
during the discussion of the WMEP proposal.
Commissioner Hovland made a motion approving the Regular HRA Meeting
Minutes of April 20, 1998, as amended. Commissioner Maetzold seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the
HRA Claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 29, 1998, and
consisting of one page totaling $4,299.66. Commissioner Faust seconded the
motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting
adjourned.
Executive Director
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
City of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 18 May, 1998
AGENDA ITEM II. HRA
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Centennial Lakes South Pond Wall & Pond Liner - Phase 11 (East Side)
Improvement PL -4
Company
1. Veit & Company, Inc.
2. Ames Construction
3. Lametti & Sons
4. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc.
5. Park Construction, Inc.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Veit & Company, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 559,815.00
2. $ 578,840.00
3. $ 619,443.00
4. $ 628,123.70
5. $ 656,181.50
$ 559,815.00
This purchase is for the construction of the south Centennial Lakes pond wall and liner
adjacent to the new Buildings 3 and 4 and future Building 5. This project will complete all
portions of the wall and liner for all of Centennial Lakes. The purchase will be financed by the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The engineer's estimate was $462,107.00.
Sign re
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Public Works - Engineering
not within budget„ Jg6 Watttn, Mince Director
Rosland, Cit M*0ger.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT 98 -1 (HRA)
Improvement No. PL -4
CENTENNIAL LAKES SOUTH POND WALL & POND LINER- PHASE 11
BID OPENING 5/15/98
11:00 AM
TOTAL BID CONTRACT
PLANHOLDER
98 -1 (HRA)
Veit & Company, Inc.
$559,815.00
Ames Construction, Inc.
$578,840.00
Lametti & Sons, Inc.
$619,443.00
Global Specialty Contractors, Inc.
$628,123.70
Park Construction, Inc.
$656,181.50
Engineer's Estimate
$462,107.00
CENTENNIAL LAKES WALL & POND LINER BID TABULATION PAGE 1 OF 2
CONTRACT 98 -1 (HRA)
IMPROVEMENT NO. PL-4
15- May-98
ITEM
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
VEIT & COMPANY, INC.
AMES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
LAMETTI & SONS, INC.
NO. ITEM
UNIT
OTY.
U.P.
TOTAL
U.P.
TOTAL
U.P.
TOTAL
U.P.
TOTAL
Bid Schedule A
1 2021.501 Mobilization
LS
1
60,000.00
60,000.00
49,100.00
49.100.00
30,000.00
30.000.00
30,000.00
30,000.00
2 2104 -000 Selvage Rlprap (Plan Quantity)
CY
340
10.00
3,400.00
1400
4,760.00
6.00
2,720.00
15.00
5,100.00
3 0000.000 Install Salvaged Rlprap
CY
7
50.00
350.00
50.00
350.00
50.00
350.00
20.00
140.00
4 2104.501 Common Excavation (Plan Quantity)
CY
3,800
4.00
15,200.00
4.00
15,200.00
4.00
15,200.00
7.00
26,600.00
5 0000.000 Excavation for Concrete Retaining Wall
LF
1238
10.00
12,380.00
7.00
8,666.00
5.00
6,190.00
5.00
6,190.00
6 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 5' -2' High
LF
664
143.00
94,952.00
181.00
120,184.00
225.00
149,400.00
180.00
119,520.00
7 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 5' -2" to 6'-6" High
LF
417
182.00
75,894.00
211.00
87,987.00
275.00
114,675.00
280.00
116,760.00
8 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall T-8" High
LF
40
204.00
8,160.00
248.00
9,920.00
350.00
14,000.00
360.00
14,400.00
9 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 8'-8' High
LF
40
226.00
9,040.00
282.00
11,280.00
400.00
16,000.00
400.00
16,000.00
10 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 9'-8" High
LF
77
253.00
19,481.00
316.00
24,332.00
400.00
30,800.00
425.00
32,725.00
11 0000.000 Sign & Logo on Curve No. 7
LS
0
NO BID
DELETED
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12 2105.000 Embankment Construction: 100% MPD Bldg 3 Exp Area
CY
1,300
5.00
6,500.00
7.00
9,100.00
4.00
5,200.00
6.00
7,800.00
13 2105.000 Embankment Construction: 95% MPS Bldg 3 Exp Area
CY
3100
5.00
15,500.00
6.00
18,600.00
4.00
12,400.00
6.00
18,600.00
and Retaining Wall Found.
14 2105.000 Embankment Construction: Wall Backfill 90% MPD
CY
1,200
5.00
6,000.00
5.50
6,600.00
4.00
4,800.00
6.00
7,200.00
15 2105.000 Embankment Construction: Pond Edge Slopes 90% MPD
CY
1500
5.00
7,500.00
6.00
9,000.00
4.00
6,000.00
6.00
9,000.00
16 0000.000 Subgrade Correction
CY
500
8.00
4,000.00
8.00
4,000.00
0.01
5.00
10.00
5,000.00
17 2105.000 Screened Sand Cover over HDPE Liner; 12" Thick
SF
38000
0.50
19,000.00
0.25
9,500.00
0.25
9,500.00
0.50
19,000.00
(Plan Quantity)
18 0000.000 High Density Polyethylene Liner (HDPE Liner)
SF
38,000
1.65
62,700.00
3.20
121,600.00
3.00
114,000.00
3.30
125,400.00
19 2511.501 Random Riprap Class III (Plan Quantity)
CY
15
70.00
1,050.00
60.00
900.00
60.00
900.00
40.00
600.00
20 3733.000 Geotextile Fabric Type IV (Plan Quantity)
SF
38,000
0.30
11,400.00
0.30
11,400.00
0.34
12,920.00
0.50
19,000.00
21 2506.508 Construct Manhole
EA
3
1,500.00
4,500.00
2,400.00
7,200.00
3,000.00
9,000.00
3,000.00
9,000.00
22 2503.511 24" RCP Cl 3 Sewer with CX-4 Joints
LF
188
40.00
7,440.00
28.00
5,208.00
40.00
7,440.00
80.00
14,880.00
23 2501.515 24' RCP Fes with CX-4 Joints
EA
3
2,000.00
6,000.00
1,500.00
4,500.00
800.00
2,400.00
300.00,
900.00
-
24 2501.515 24' RCP Cl 3
LF
16
40.00
640.00
33.00
528.00
45.00
720.00
70.00
1,120.00
25 2503.511 18" RCP C13
LF
16
30.00
480.00
30.00
480.00
45.00
720.00
60.00
960.00
26 0000.000 Brick & Mortor Bulkheads
EA
4
100.00
400.00
700.00
2,800.00
750.00
3,000.00
100.00
400.00
27 2575.000 Seeding
AC
1
800.00
800.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
28 0000.000 Erosion Control
LS
0
NO BID
DELETED
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
29 2575.000 Erosion Control Sod
SY
500
2.00
1,000.00
5.00
2,500.00
2.00
1,000.00
4.00
2,000.00
30 0000.000 Sill Fence
LF
1,000
3.00
3,000.00
2.00
2,000.00
2.50
2,500.00
2.50
2,500.00
31 0000.000 Hay Bales
EA
100
3.00
300.00
30.00
3,000.00
6.00
600.00
20.00
2,000.00
32 0000.000 Small Rubber Track Skidster
HR
40
80.00
3,200.00
95.00
3,800.00
45.00
1,800.00
65.00
2,600.00
33 0000.000 Labor
HR
40
40.00
1,600.00
50.00
2,000.00
35.00
1,400.00
50.00
2,000.00
34 0000.000 12" PVC, SDR 26
LF
8
30.00
240.00
40.00
320.00
25.00
200.00
6.00
48.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE A - CONTRACT 98- 1(HRA)
462,107.00
559,815.00
578,840.00
619,443.00
Alternate 1 Alternate HDPE Liner/Conc Wall Connections Devices
LS
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
and Installation (Deduct)
CENTENNIAL LAKES WALL & POND LINER BID TABULATION PAGE 2 OF 2
CONTRACT 98 -1 (HRA)
IMPROVEMENT NO. PL-4
15- May -98
ITEM
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTR.
PARK CONSTRUCTION, INC.
NO. ITEM
UNIT
QTY.
U.P.
TOTAL
U.P.
TOTAL
U.P.
TOTAL
Bid Schedule A
1 2021.501 Mobilization
LS
1
60,000.00
60,000.00
57,435.00
57,435.00
30,000.00
30,000.00
2 2104.000 Salvage Riprap (Plan Quantity)
CY
340
10.00
3,400.00
16.70
5,678.00
29.60
10,064.00
3 0000.000 Install Salvaged Riprap
CY
7
50.00
350.00
110.00
770.00
46.10
322.70
4 2104.501 Common Excavation (Plan Quantity)
CY
3,800
4.00
15,200.00
4.30
16,340.00
5.90
22,420.00
5 0000.000 Excavation for Concrete Retaining Wall
LF
1238
10.00
12,380.00
21.65
28,802.70
9.50
11,761.00
6 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wale 5' -2' High
LF
664
143.00
94,952.00
220.00
148,080.00
245.00
162,680.00
7 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 5' -2' to 6'$' High
LF
417
182.00
75,894.00
226.00
94,242.00
320.00
133,440.00
8 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 7'-8' High
LF
40
204.00
8,160.00
278.00
11,120.00
330.00
13,200.00
9 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 8'-8' High
LF
40
226.00
9,040.00
310.00
12,400.00
340.00
13,600.00
10 0000.000 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall 9' -0' High
LF
77
253.00
19,481.00
345.00
26,565.00
350.00
26,950.00
11 0000.000 Sign & Logo on Curve No. 7
LS
0
NO BID
DELETED
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12 2105.000 Embankment Construction: 100% MPD Bldg 3 Exp, Area
CY
1,300
5.00
6,500.00
8.00
10,400.00
5.60
7,280.00
13 2105.000 Embankment Construction: 95% MPS Bldg 3 Exp Area
CY
3100
5.00
15,500.00
5.50
17,050.00
5.50
17,050.00
and Retaining Wall Found.
14 2105.000 Embankment Construction: Wall Backfill 90% MPD
CY
1,200
5.00
6,000.00
5.50
6,600.00
5.40
6,480.00
15 2105.000 Embankment Construction: Pond Edge Slopes 90% MPD
CY
1500
5.00
7,500.00
5.50
8,250.00
6.90
10,350.00
16 0000.000 Subgrade Correction
CY
500
8.00
4,000.00
5.50
2,750.00
2.70
1,350.00
17 2105.000 Screened Sand Cover over HDPE Liner, 12" Thick
SF
38000
0.50
19,000.00
0.36
13,680.00
0.59
22,420.00
(Plan Quantity)
18 0000.000 High Density Polyethylene Liner (HDPE Liner)
SF
38,000
1.65
62,700.00
3.00
114,000.00
3.15
119,700.00
19 2511.501 Random Riprap Class III (Plan Quantity)
CY
15
70.00
1,050.00
61.00
915.00
46.10
691.50
20 3733.000 Geolextile Fabric Type IV (Plan Quantity)
SF
38,000
0.30
11,400.00
0.40
15,200.00
0.33
12,540.00
21 2506.508 Construct Manhole
EA
3
1,500.00
4,500.00
4,900.00
14,700.00
2,659.10
7,977.30
22 2503.511 24' RCP Cl 3 Sewer with CX-4 Joints
LF
186
40.00
7,440.00
68.00
12,648.00
49.50
9,207.00
23 2501.515 24' RCP Fes with CX-4 Joints
EA
3
2,000.00
6,000.00
882.00
2,646.00
741.00
2,223.00
24 2501.515 24' RCP Cl 3 -
LF
16
40.00
640.00
71.00
1,136.00
47.50
760.00
25 2503.511 18' RCP CI 3
LF
16
30.00
480.00
70.00
1,120.00
36.80
588.80
26 0000.000 Brick & Mortor Bulkheads
EA
4
100.00
400.00
378.00
1,512.00
60.20
240.80
27 2575.000 Seeding
AC
1
800.00
800.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
28 0000.000 Erosion Control
LS
0
NO BID
DELETED
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
29 2575.000 Erosion Control Sod
SY
500
2.00
1,000.00
1.00
500.00
2.75
1,375.00
30 0000.000 Silt Fence
LF
1,000
3.00
3,000.00
2.00
2,000.00
3.50
3,500.00
31 0000.000 Hay Bales
EA
100
3.00
300.00
5.00
500.00
5.00
500.00
32 0000.000 Small Rubber Track Skidster
HR
40
80.00
3,200.00
28.00
1,120.00
68.00
2,720.00
33 0000.000 Labor
HR
40
40.00
1,600.00
63.00
2,520.00
40.00
1,600.00
34 0000.000 12' PVC, SDR 26
LF
8
30.00
240.00
55.50
444.00
23.80
190.40
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE A - CONTRACT 98- 1(HRA)
656,181.50
462,107.00
o
628,123.70
Alternate 1 Alternate HDPE Liner /Conc Wall Connections Devices
LS
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
and Installation (Deduct)
Z
owe V,
U
v, f�roRe�
RE P O RURE C O MME ND ATI O N
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
HRA III
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date: MAY 18, 1998
Mgr. Recommends
®
To HRA
Subject:
F-]
To Council
PUBLIC WALKWAY
Action
®
Motion
IMPROVEMENT-
Resolution
50`h STREET PLAZA
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize project and advertisement for bids.
Report:
The proposed project comprises the public walkway connecting West 501h Street to the
51s' Street parking ramp and other businesses to the south and east. This walkway
serves as an egress from the Edina Theater and will also provide access to the new
50T" Street Plaza building under construction west of the Theater.
This public walkway has never been improved to the same standard as the other
walkways in the area. The improvement of this walkway is now warranted due to the
construction of the 50th Street Plaza building to the west. The improvement will include
pavers, landscaping, planting beds and lighting. The design will be similar to other
public walkways at 50th & France.
RECOMMENDATION /REPORT - PUBLIC WALKWAY IMPROVMENT
50TH STREET PLAZA
May 18, 1998
Page two
This improvement project will be integrated with improvements undertaken and paid for
by the developers of the 50`h Street Plaza building. These private improvements include
a covered walkway linking the parking ramp to 501' Street. In addition, the private
developers will construct and pay for the staircase and entrance to their shops from the
walkway.
The public project is estimated to cost $78,557.00. In accordance with past policy at
501h & France, we recommend that 20% of the cost be assessed and the remaining
80% will be financed through tax increments. In this case, we recommend that the
entire 20% be assessed against the 50`h Street Plaza property rather than spread
among all businesses at 501h & France. Staff believes that this is a very beneficial
improvement which should complete the public walkway system at 501h & France.
DP.wv W..tW
.ja• onaor.cP ?:•n. TYR
•n.1J 4
. ^^ "^,4,r
vi&TR rlrtTU" T7r
iuuoel brbi,
•arrtret'•wr/c' P�nw. +-Yr.
rL.«Tet- fvu• TYr.
OfflaJRetall
ff. i MGM
N� IMwr a Tbrt 4ri'V• tLCOTH.w -i- ouTLEi TYR
p--- covered Oob to parking by LdW Properlke
1't •4 .
w. �yK�iy
r. op�lo6 '.
1•:
w /C.vtt.•. '_j i-/Y TYr
PLAN
L--, 2• V /hhtT YEu
~IT�•O�v�fi.7e6.T C'. M'N *Lr`t
1. 6f+v� 2.
PARKING TO 50TH STREET PEDESTRIAN LINK
EDINA
Nurlb lown—
RRW Inc.
14. My 1996
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998 (18:58)
page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13300
05/18/98
$5,005.00
BRAUN INTERTEC
Soil tests
99990
GRANDVIEW
PARKS
05/18/98
$2,300.00
BRAUN INTERTEC
Soil test
102872
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PRO FEE
ARCH /E
< *>
$7,305.00*
13301
05/18/98
$1,416.96
BRW INC.
Arch fees
26703880
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PRO FEE
ARCH /E
05/18/98
$33,875.52
BRW INC.
Arch fees
26703881
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PRO FEE
ARCH /E
< *>
$35,292.48*
13302
05/18/98
$750.00
BUELL'S INC
Trees for putting cou
2177
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
3821
< *>
$750.00*
13303
05/18/98
$15,921.52
C.S. McCrossan Construct
PARKS
97 -2 #6
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
$15,921.52*
13304
05/18/98
$93,778.27
GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRAC
PARKS
09 -3 #5.
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
$93,778.27*
13305
05/18/98
$391.95
LEITNER COMPANY
Green soil
157445
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
4052
< *>
$391.95*
13306
05/18/98
$405.00
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONT
Soil investigation
043098
GRANDVIEW
MISC
< *>
$405.00*
13307
05/18/98
$38.50
Ola, Deanna
Tranferred
042898
50TH STREET
PARKING
PERMIT
< *>
$38.50*
13308
05/18/98
$700.00
SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B
Landscape Arch
98111
GRANDVIEW
PRO FEE
ARCH /E
< *>
$700.00*
$154,582.72*
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 4,1998 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, and Mayor
Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and
seconded by Member Faust to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall: .
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 20. 1998, AND BOARD OF
REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 20,1998, APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold
and seconded by Member Faust approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April
20,1998, and the Board of Review Meeting of April 20,1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE/UTILITY
EASEMENT (6533 PARNELL AVENUE) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Engineer
Engineer Hoffman stated the property owner at 6533 Parnell Avenue is proposing to expand
his garage and the new proposal would extend onto an existing utility and drainage
easement. This request has been reviewed by NSP, USWest, Paragon Cable, Minnegasco and
City staff. The request is acceptable to all parties and staff recommends vacation of a portion
of the utility and drainage easement.
No public comments were received.
Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT
FOR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES
LOT 2, BLOCK 1- NORMANDALE- KREISER REPLAT
WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council on April 6,1998, fixed a date for a public hearing
on a proposed vacation of an easement for utility and drainage purposes; and
WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the
hearing was held on the 41h day of May, 1998, at which time all persons desiring to be
heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that
said easement vacation be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements
within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone, or cable
television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or
under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon
such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or
otherwise attend thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described utility and drainage easement
be and is hereby vacated effective as of May 4,1998:
The easterly five (5) feet of the Southerly one hundred two (102) feet of the Westerly
ten (10) feet of LOT 2, BLOCK 1, NORMANDALE- KREISER REPLAT, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota, as donated and dedicated
by said plat of NORMANDALE- KREISER REPLAT.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a
notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer of record of the
County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 412.85.
ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1998. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
ACTION CONTINUED UNTIL TUNE 1, 1998 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
VACATION OF PORTION OF WEST 69TH STREET APPROVED (CHRIST
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (6901 NORMANDALE ROAD) BUILDING AND PARKING
LOT EXPANSION, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF WEST 70TH STREET AND
EAST OF HIGHWAY 100) Mayor Smith opened the public hearing by saying that the public
hearing will focus on land use only. He quoted from one of many letters the Council and staff
have received concerning the controversy surrounding Christ Presbyterian Church's (CPC)
request by stating, "I would never have imagined the proposed expansion would have
inspired such vehement and what appears to be small- minded opposition. I was fearful the
naysayers would intimidate the Planning Commission and I therefore applaud the
Commissions unanimous vote to recommend adoption of the Church's most recent
approval. If there remain those who cannot see beyond their own backyard views, and
vehicle counts, to tolerate, if not to embrace the needs of CPC's congregation and the broader
community groups it supports, they should be pitied for this parochialism. Edina should not
let this sort of smug 'we've got ours' sentiment carry the day on this important issue." He
reminded those in attendance again that the issue tonight is land use, not the developer's
popularity, or the church's programs. Mayor Smith pointed out the recommendation of the
Planning Commission as an advisory group to the Council to approve the Conditional Use
Permit with seven conditions. He explained he has personally sat in a Police Squad observing
the area on a Sunday morning as well as watched other Council Members walking the site
and neighborhood. The Planning Commissions views are advisory, they are not binding on
the Council and the final decision is the Councils.
Mayor Smith said the process being followed will be: 1) the Church's presentation, 2) City
staff's presentation of the Planning Commission results, conditions and procedures, 3)
Council concerns and questions of the proponent, or the Planning Commission, 3) the
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Woodhill Neighborhood Association comments, 4) Resident comments and, 5) Council
discussion. Mayor Smith noted many letters have been received, copied and distributed to
the Council.
PROPONENT'S PRESENTATION
Peter Jarvis, of Laukka Jarvis, said he is representing Christ Presbyterian Church with their
request for a Conditional Use Permit allowing building expansion on the northeast quadrant
of Highway 100 and 701h Street. Three other persons will speak to this proposed expansion.
Polly Bowles, a member of the CPC Steering Committee and the neighborhood liaison,
would explain the process followed in the last four years culminating with the decision made
by Session (CPC's governing body). While programs of a church may not be the business of
Council, it is ultimately a programmatic issue that leads to a physical need for expanded
facilities. Mr. larvis would explain the evolution of the final site plan. Gary Tushie, Tushie
and Associates, would present the architecture of the proposed expansion and Jim Benshoof,
would present results of the traffic impact analysis completed on the area.
Polly Bowles elaborated on the chronology of CPC's internal decision making process:
1993 - 1995 CPC studied eight long -range planning options and decided to stay at its
current site and maximize the facility usage with creative programming. (Full Informational
Booklet for the Proposed Expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church is on file in the office of
the City Clerk.)
1996 Steering Committee formed - process of prayer, study and congregational
input to maximize facility changes to equip CPC for ministries for which it was called. Other
options tried were, e.g., rescheduled services, changed timing of youth programming and
location, adjusted use of space, fellowship held in different location, and both the renting of
Cornelia School and busing from the parking lot of Cornelia School.
January 1997 - July 1997 Session unanimously adopted Steering Committee's
recommendation to undertake a capital campaign to expand CPC's facilities. Informational
communications were sent to members and neighbors of the impending process and seeking
input. Goal of the campaign was completed with initial pledges of $5.4 million.
July 1997 - December 1997 CPC developed design alternatives providing facilities to
meets needs, address concerns of neighbors, and one that would be financially. feasible. The
Woodhill /Edina Association was kept apprised of CPC's time -frame for neighborhood
meetings. Session voted in December to endorse incurring up to $3 million additional debt to
complete Phase I as soon as possible.
January 1998 - February 1998 CPC's congregation voted to pursue building the
proposed expansion and to incur the additional $3 million debt. Before approaching the City
of Edina for necessary permits, CPC, and the Woodhill/ Edina Association Board, scheduled
a second round of neighborhood meetings to discuss CPC's design alternatives. Individual
neighbors immediately adjacent to the proposed expansion met to discuss design alternatives
and any personal concerns.
--Ms.- Bowles concluded that some-neighbors still feel frustrated their expectations have not
been met. Both the Association and CPC are dealing with volunteers and matching erratic
schedules has been a challenge. She reiterated the sincerity of CPC and their efforts. One
neighborhood concern was that the neighborhood should have had the opportunity for input
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
into the ,eight options and not a building proposal. Looking at the options and how they
affect CPC, they involve how the church worships, fellowships, educates members, serves the
community and how it budgets its resources. Those questions relate to the religious core of
the church. The only appropriate place to address those decisions is within the church. When
a building proposal came forward, that was the time to involve the neighborhood and solicit
their input.. Negative comments received included: "no change is acceptable" and "why not
cap membership ". Many valid positive comments were received as well. The design being
presented by Peter Jarvis is responsive to neighbors comments.
Peter Jarvis stated in late spring of 1997, the first preliminary site and architectural plans
were presented to the neighborhood. Mr. Jarvis presented a graphic depicting the expansion
oriented to the west side of the property running in a north /south direction paralleling
Highway 100. The parking'lot cascades down the hill in a north /south direction with the
southwest corner of the site the lowest point. The plan represents the relocation of 69th Street
from the curve between Brittany and Dunberry west to the frontage road. The first proposal
contemplated a parking lot expansion giving easements to the neighborhood in favor of the
City, for emergency access purposes that Mr. Jarvis referred to as a cocoon solution. The
opposition to the plan dealt with visual impact of the parking lot, protrusion north of existing .
69th Street, expanse of asphalt and sanctuary size. Mr. Jarvis added this was never proposed
to be a mega- church. Three sanctuary plans were proposed with different seating
configurations. Phase I would be the sanctuary expansion. Phase II was included on the plan
and would be completed in 5 -7 years. Phase II would consist of child/ adult education rooms
and administrative offices and CPC wanted it included on the master plan.
Mr. Jarvis showed a graphic comparing the proposed expansion of CPC and other larger
Edina churches such as Grace Church with worship capacity at 1100 (up to 1500 expansion).
CPC's proposed expansion would be at 1092 (up to 1238 for expansion). The April 1997
neighborhood meeting dealt mainly with the mega - church. The plan was further criticized
for lack of perimeter conditions and lack of property maintenance. The design team was
resurrected, a landscape engineer was brought in as well as a traffic engineer and data began
being collected. A six month redesign process ensued with architectural, structural, size
plan/ landscaping and pricing with the general contractor. Four alternatives came from the
redesign process. The four alternatives were presented to the Planning Commission
following meetings with the neighborhood Board of Directors and neighborhood.
Mr. Jarvis explained design drawings outlining CPC's planned two -phase expansion.' Phase I
would include a new fellowship hall and associated support spaces in the lower level (12,450
s.f.) with of new sanctuary at the main level (12,450 s.f.), the new balcony above the sanctuary
in the upper level (6,380 s.f.) and a remodeling of the existing sanctuary into a new narthex
and support spaces. Phase II consists of mechanical and storage spaces in the lower level
(9,780 s.f.), new offices, library, and classrooms at the main level (9,780 s.f.) and a new
counseling center and classrooms at the upper level (9,120 s.f.).
The architectural expansion reinforces the existing colonial character of the existing building
with both additions matching existing exterior materials such as brick, shingles, windows,
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
dormers, etc. The simple but strong forms and details would enhance the church's position as
a landmark within the community and neighborhood.
In addition to the building expansion, the parking lot is reorganized with expansion to the
north - including a vacated 691h Street. The access to 701h Street has been moved as far east as
possible and is designed to allow the maximum car stacking and easy access in and out of the
church property. All four site plan options contain the parking lot layout and are essentially
the same except the north area treatment. The four options are as follows:
OPTION 1 - contains a 647 -space parking lot with an eliminated 691h Street which
facilitates ease of movement in and out of the neighborhood.
OPTION 2 - depicts 647 parking spaces as well. It does not allow movement between
the church parking lot and neighborhood, except for emergency vehicles. The plan would
also eliminate 6911, Street.
OPTION 3 - shows a 546 space parking lot, relocation of 691h Street to the CPC's north
boundary. A 50' right -of -way is provided with a new 24' wide street posted NO PARKING
that CPC would build and publicly dedicate to the City. Access would be provided between
the new parking lot and neighborhood via the relocated 691h Street.
OPTION 4 - presents an option identical to Option 3 except the driveway from the
parking lot to 69th Street is eliminated. This would minimize traffic between the church and
neighborhood.
Landscaping on the site would provide a thick border of 12' -14' spruce trees at the east and
north property lines, which provides attractive ,screening of the parking lot from the
neighbors. Landscaped islands have been introduced into the parking lot to create pods or
smaller parking areas to minimize the impact of the entire parking area. Lighting has been
added to the parking lot as well but kept to a 19' 6" pole height and a fixture chosen to
eliminate direct glare to surrounding homes.
Mr. Jarvis stated Edina staff concluded on February 25, 1998, that Option 1 and 3 were
acceptable from the Planning, Public Works, Fire and Police Departments' standpoint. The
Planning staff report recommended Option 3 for approval to the Planning Commission.
Following the Planning Commission meeting, CPC believed they needed to revisit the site
and attempt compromises with their land. Then meet with the neighborhood Board of
Directors and ultimately the neighbors, taking into consideration their compromises before
again meeting with the Planning Commission on April 15, 1998. Following February
meetings with Steve Brown of the Board of Directors and after his meeting with the
neighborhood, the consensus was that the neighborhood wanted no change to 69th Street.
When the Board of Directors were asked about architectural or site planning changes to any
options they had seen, they suggested they would rather react to any additional plans rather
than suggest what CPC does.
Following an additional meeting between CPC and the Woodhill Association Board 'of
- - - - - -- Directors, a compromise plan was drawn. The plan was presented to the Woodhill
Association Board and the neighborhood on March 26, 1998. Option 5 now focuses on the
north end. Deep concern was expressed by the neighborhood regarding the removal of three
homes and creation of a parking lot. If the road was curved to the south and preserved, one
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
of the two lots facing Brittany would cut the visual intrusion along Brittany in half.
Acquisition of the Marty property was required to accomplish Option 5. The plan creates two
new lots and no net loss in housing. The home owned by CPC on Brittany is also being
refurbished. This proposal reduced parking places from 640 to 540.
Mr. Jarvis stated the Planning Commission and staff reviewed the plan. Two changes were
suggested, 1) eliminate access to 701h Street and relocate access to where it is today -or north
of the circulation road on the west side of the parking lot, • 2) eliminate curb cut on 691h Street
and relocate it as it is today on the frontage road. Option 5 also increased additional green
space. Mr. Jarvis said he had a further recommendation for the curb cut on 701h Street from
the Planning Commission that would be discussed at a later time.
Mr. Jarvis presented graphic scale drawings depicting the proposed dense plantings on the
berms. Plantings depicted would be actual size at time of planting. He reminded the Council
that Phase II is depicted on the drawings, but CPC has no plans to build Phase II for 5 - 7
years.
Gary Tushie, Tushie and Associates, reviewed the proposed floor plans and exterior building
elevations of Phase I. The proposed main level would include the sanctuary to the south, a
new entrance into the old sanctuary which will be converted into a narthex. Two stairs lead
to the balcony and down to the lower level fellowship hall and additional meeting space. A
new elevator is proposed to serve all three levels and would connect to the north part of the
church. Coat room storage and a kitchenette would also be included on the main level.
Enclosed storage off the proposed west side will be used to house buses and outside
equipment.
LOWER LEVEL:
The lower level expansion below the sanctuary would be utilized for a new fellowship hall, a
relocated kitchen, bathrooms, classrooms, choir room and be re- connected into the existing
fellowship hall. The lower level would exit southerly at grade to an outdoor patio with
numerous plantings.
EXTERIOR ELEVATION:
The exterior elevation looks west towards the church with new dormers added to the sloped
roof and a new steeple.
TOP ELEVATION: i
East side - looking west the plan depicts the proposed Phase I sanctuary, existing sanctuary
and existing office and classroom space proceeding north.
SOUTH ELEVATION:
Depicts the proposed new porte cochere or new foyer drop -off area of the narthex.
Materials would match or compliment materials to the colonial character, Jeffersonian
influence, existing building, both in brick and siding. The new steeple would be an add -
alternate and similar to the steeple on the existing church.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Jim Benshoof, Benshoof & Associates, Inc., Transpiration Engineers and Planners, presented
results of a traffic and parking study associated with the proposed expansion of Christ
Presbyterian Church.
Mr. Benshoof presented the following:
1. Background and Purpose:
• Collected a substantial amount of data
• Established post - development traffic and parking forecasts
• Analyzed traffic and parking effects of the proposed expansion program
with focus on if expansion program can be accomplished without causing
adverse impacts on nearby neighborhoods.
2. Description of Data collected:
• Extensive data collected on 70th Street to the south; Frontage road to the
west and residential streets of 69th Street, Brittany Road and Dunberry Lane
to the north and east
• Data collected during hourly traffic volumes for residential streets; trips
from church Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday church activities; parking
accumulation in lots during Sunday, Tuesday and Wednesday church
activities; on -street parking during Sunday and Tuesday church activities;
and neighborhood trips through the lot to 70th Street.
2. Description of Analysis Performed:
• Projected post - development number of trips to and from church and
parking during Sunday activities for four access options.
• Projected future Sunday daily traffic volumes for residential streets north
and east of the church
• Projected future parking demand
• Analyzed traffic and parking projects whether functions could be
adequately accommodated without adverse impacts on nearby
neighborhoods.
Conclusions:
• Existing Traffic Volumes:
• Brittany Road/ Dunberry Lane - Traffic volumes well within normal range
for residential streets all days of week. Volumes are higher Sundays,
Tuesdays and Wednesdays but within normal levels
• 70th Street (East of church driveway) - Sunday is busiest day but the volume
is still only one -half of weekday morning peak volume or one -third of
weekday afternoon rush.
• Existing On -Street Parking
* Some on Sunday and Tuesdays
* Existing Congestion on 69th Street - Church users park on both sides
of 69th during peak periods which interferes with travel between
Frontage Road, the neighborhood or church.
• Typical neighborhood trips through Church lot - 29 trips from Dunberry or
Brittany daily
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
• Post - development traffic on 70th Street (East of Church driveway) expected to
remain well below volumes during weekday AM and PM peak hours
• Post - development Sunday Daily Traffic Volumes on Brittany/ Dunberry show
existing Brittany at 509 and Dunberry at 266. Option 3 would see a slight increase
to 560 for Brittany Road and 300 for Dunberry Lane. With Option 4, traffic would
be 390 daily trips on Brittany and 200 on Dunberry
• Adequacy of Church Driveways to Provide Sufficient Capacity for Entering and
Exiting Traffic, 701h Street will provide adequate capacity for Church traffic for 1)
driveway upgrade providing standard traffic lane alignments and widths, 2) Police
officer will continue to provide safe /effective traffic operation
• Other Effects on Neighborhood -Any of proposed options eliminate need of on-
street parking on residential streets; Options 1;3 & 4 preserve access between
neighborhood and Frontage Road, Option 2 does not; Options 1 & 3 preserve
opportunity for neighbors to drive through Church lot to ' 70th, Options 2 & 4 do
not. All four options eliminate existing 69th Street congestion.
Mr. Benshoof concluded the expansion program as presented would effectively meet traffic
and parking needs. No adverse traffic impacts would be experienced on neighborhood
streets and neighborhoods would gain a benefit from existing conditions through the
prohibition of on- street parking on the neighborhood streets by Church users.
Peter Jarvis noted that CPC is willing to enter into a Conditional Use Permit with all
conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. Asa result of the requirements
regarding deed restrictions, and to insure control of the sale of property, Attorney Gilligan
was requested to prepare a legal framework memorandum dealing with the HRA being the
City's agent with these restrictions. These restrictions would cover the sale of the two parcels
as well as the plot proposed to be subdivided.
Mr. Jarvis added the Church would enter into an agreement: 1) that insures reconstruction of
the relocated 69th Street meeting City standards and rededicated back to the City., 2) that the
Marty house and the house south of Brittany and 691h would be sold after they are
refurbished, "and 3) Two new buildable lots would be created subject to approval of the
Planning Commission and Council.
If approval is given, the street would be reconstructed between June and September at the
new location with proper utility and service connections run to the proposed two lots.
Landscaping would need to be completed before May 30 or not until fall. The two homes and
two lots would be marketed in August/ September as well. Site staging would be done in late
summer and parking lot completed in two phases. Landscaping will be on the north side of
the property first then on the easterly property line. A bond will be posted in the amount of
$34- $36,000 for the relocation of 691h Street.
Mr. Jarvis continued stating NURP (National Urban Runoff Program) affects every
development requiring rate and quantity of runoff so post development is substantially
similar to pre - development condition. Initially the pond was to be located in the southwest
corner but would have required removal of 20 oak /maple /ash trees. One suggestion has
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
been to contact the Mn/ DOT to check if the site could use the excess capacity on the other
side of the freeway. Staff and the Watershed District have worked out a verbal agreement
that would be acceptable if the Council concurs. Some water storage would be on site also.
Mr. Jarvis expressed his belief that CPC has responded to the neighborhood concerns.
However, it. has failed to get the Woodhill Board support vote for the compromise plan. He
added the plan will have less impact especially on the immediate neighborhood. An overall
positive impact on the Edina community by: 1) improving the ugly existing parking lot with
internal landscaping, 2) expansion of lot by 200 spaces eliminates on- street parking in
neighborhood and 70th Street, 3) landscaping and a change of grade with a wall of green from
day one, and 4) dramatic re- lighting down to 191/2 feet with light source that is invisible off
site, similar to. the lighting on Parklawn near Centennial Lakes. Mr. Jarvis stated churches are
an asset to the community. He said most good realtors would say there are three important
things for a residential neighborhood: churches, schools and parks. Mr. Jarvis told about a
planned community, Columbia, developed in the east. Sociologists wrestled with developing
infrastructure to include parks, schools and churches immediately, so prospective residents
would not need to worry about them. Edina is blessed with great schools, churches and
parks. In conclusion, Mr. Jarvis urged the Council's approval of CPC's proposed expansion
allowing them to play a part in this community
PRESENTATION BY PLANNER:
Planner Larsen reminded the Council that the Planning Commission recommended approval
conditioned upon:
1. Vacation of existing West 69th Street right -of -way, and dedication of new right -of-
way as illustrated on the revised site plan (option 5).
2. Developer's Agreement covering cost and providing security for construction of
the new street.
3. All necessary permits from Nine Mile Creek Watershed district and Mn/ DOT
(DNR).
4. Modification of curb cuts on northerly portion of the site as recommend by the
Director of Public Works.
5. Curb cut on West 701h Street should remain where it is today or be moved further
west as determined by the Director of Public Works.
6. The subdivision and replatting of lots north of the relocated West 69th Street.
7. No portion of Phase II construction can commence until replatted lots are sold with
deed restrictions.
Planner Larsen explained that certain actions have taken place addressing conditions 4, 6,
and 7 since the Planning Commission met as follows:
• Condition 4. Site plan (option 5) has been modified adjusting the curb cuts as
recommended by the Director of Public Works.
• Condition 6. The church made application for subdivision of the ,properties north
of the relocated West 696 Street. The Planning Commission will consider the
proposed subdivision at their May 27, 1998, meeting. The proposed subdivision
proposes two new lots fronting on West 69th Street.
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Condition 7. A memorandum from Attorney Gilligan addresses the platting, sale
and future use of the properties located north of the relocated street has been
drafted.
Planner Larsen concluded what is before Council tonight is action on the Conditional Use
Permit allowing the expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church physical plant and expansion of
the Church's parking lot. He reminded Council a three /fifths favorable vote would be
needed to proceed. Following action on the Conditional Use Permit, action would be needed
on the proposal to vacate West 691h street and rededicate the street northerly of its present
location. Future actions by either the Planning Commission or Council would be to consider
the subdivision north of relocated 69th Street. .
Attorney Gilligan said responding to the Planning Commissions condition insuring that the
lots are sold for residential uses and after discussing the subject with staff he prepared a
memorandum outlining the Development Agreement that would be entered into between
the Edina HRA and Christ Presbyterian. Church covering the residential lots north of 69th
Street as follows:
Development Agreement would provide:
1: Lots platted in a timely manner;
2. Church would have a reasonable period of time to sell lots for residential use (24
months or until commencement of Phase II whichever occurs earlier);
3. If lots do not sell within set time period, lots would be forfeited by the Church to
the HRA;
4. Lots forfeited to the HRA would be sold by the HRA for development of single
family residences and proceeds received by HRA from such sale less expenses by
HRA would be paid to the church;
5. Deed transferring title to any lot would contain restrictions which will run in favor
of the HRA and provide that the property may not be used for church purposes or
any other use which .would cause the property to be exempt from real estate taxes.
The deed restriction would be recorded whether the lot is sold by the Church, or
forfeited to the HRA and sold by the HRA
Attorney Gilligan said the Development Agreement would -be recorded in the real estate
records as a lien against the property. The Developers Agreement will provide that the
property will not be released by the HRA until the sale of such lot, with the required deed
restriction, and furnishing to the HRA evidence satisfactory to the HRA, that the purchaser
intends to construct a single family residence on the lot, and has secured construction
financing, or has sufficient available funds for this purpose.
The HRA would have broad authority to provide for housing and other development in the
City and the Development Agreement will recite that it is being entered into in furtherance of
this purpose in order to ensure development of the lots from single family housing in a
timely manner. All costs related to the Development Agreement will be required to be paid
by the Church. The provisions as to forfeiture of title to the property is similar to what was
required by the HRA in the Redevelopment Agreements for the Edinborough and Centennial
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Lakes projects and is a fairly standard provision in redevelopment contracts with
development authorities.
WOODHILL ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESENTATION:
Steve Brown, representing the Association, but not speaking for all of the Association, stated
the neighborhood supports the church and believes it is a community asset. This is not an
issue of religion, it is land use issues and adherence to the Comprehensive Plan, impacts of
continued growth on the neighborhood, alternative options, and real compromise. The
Association has received gratuitous updates at best from the church. The Association would
like strict adherence to the Comprehensive Plan. The Association also does not want a
relocation of 69th Street nor do they want demolition of any-homes.
Mr. Brown gave a chronology of Christ Presbyterian's progress:
1957 Church bought lots to build
1968 Church expanded sanctuary
1973 Undeveloped lots were donated to Church
1978 Church attempted to create parking lot north of West 69th/CPC withdrew
proposal due to strong neighborhood opposition
1981 Highway 100 changed traffic patterns
1989 Church added 29,000 s.f. to their campus and parking agreement added 170
parking stalls
- Letter from Rev. Virgil Lee, CPC's Minister saying impact on neighborhood
will be minimal
- Letter from Vic and Sally Hall stating it is not CPC's intent to increase
membership where it would be a detriment to the neighborhood. Expansion
approved subject to conditions and was the foundation for the parking
agreement in place today. Additional parking capacity exists today within the
site within that plan around approximately 170 stalls.
- Comment from Bill Hall (CPC building committee) referring to CPC's plans
for northern lots that had been proposed to be parking lot in 1978 and the
church acknowledged this was not a good idea and was insensitive to the
neighbors. Property was held for investment and the church would consider
selling if they obtained a good offer.
Bill Hall of CPC Building Committee at July Council meeting referred to CPC's
plan for northern lots that had been proposed to be a parking lot in 1978
1991 - Church applied for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of parking on
the vacant land north of West 69th Street.
- Denied by the City with following comments: 1) proposal disturbs me. I
remember very clearly two years ago when CPC requested a Conditional Use
Permit to remodel their existing facility, they indicated at that time they would
not cross 691h Street (Former Commissioner Nan Faust); 2) This is a residential
neighborhood and the church has not investigated all alternatives that were to
be implemented with their previous proposal. The growth of a church should
not 'swallow' a neighborhood and if the church is experiencing such growth,
maybe they should consider relocating." (Commissioner Helen McClelland).
1994 Four homes purchased to date for CPC's investment of $778,500
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
1997 Neighbors contacted by CPC about plans
Factual Review: Increase building area to 131,084 s.f. (Phase I and II)
Membership: 54% Edina
90% 5 mile radius
5% in 55435 Zip Code
Traffic & Safety: 1) Access to park must cross 66th or 70th Streets, 2) Streets
are neighborhood sidewalks, 3) Kids play in streets, 4) Cornelia
School traffic committee formed, 5) Hilly terrain affects visibility
Daily Traffic Counts - West 70th Street
1986 - 12,100
1997 - 21,500 (66% increase in 9 years) Problems will only increase, CPC
adding to problem, CPC not primary reason, and why
exacerbate problem.
Traffic out from Brittany, 62 trips per day - projected 100 - increase 61 %
in from Brittany, 86 trips per day - projected 134 - increase 57%
Traffic out to Dunberry, 83 trips per day - projected 135 - increase 61 %
in from Dunberry, 27 trips per day, projected 38 - increase 41 %
Traffic in 70th from W, 441 trips per day, projected 683 - increase 55%
out 70th to W, 375 trips per day, projected 595 - increase 59%
Traffic in 70�h from E, 80 trips per day, projected 127 - increase 59%
out 701h to E, 147 trips per day, projected 204 - increase 39%
Commercial Property in Area:
Industrial 900,000 s.f.
Retail 2,700,000 s.f.
Office 3,500,000 s.f.
1,000,000 s.f. planned or under construction
Mr. Brown explained that Option 5 is NOT 1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 2)
consistent with "Growing Small ", 3) in the best interest of the neighborhood, 4) a win -win
proposition and 5) a compromise. He added 1) no physical structure has been changed, 2) the
plan still shows relocation of West 69th Street to the north, 3) the plan is to still demolish three
homes, 4) loss of extensive greenspace for parking lot and 5) no assurances that this is the end
of CPC's expansion plans.
Recommendations by the Board of Directors are as follows:
A. Settlement of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual
concessions by blending of qualities of two different things
B. Bind by mutual agreement to adjust or settle by mutual concessions to
come to agreement by mutual concession
Mr. Brown stated 200 signatures had been gathered imploring the Council that:
• West 69th Street stays in current location
• Expansion is allowed only on existing site
• No church parking allowed on West 70th at any time
• No church parking allowed on West 69th, Dunberry, Brittany or Normandale
except on Sundays
• Homes and lots north of 69th are sold prior to construction on exiting site
Page 12
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
• Restrictive covenants are put in place on all homes and lots north of 69th as single
family for 40 years
• Landscaping and lighting is as proposed
• Curb cuts installed as recommended by the Planning Commission
Mr. Brown asked the Council to be visionary and anticipate the long term impact of the
proposed expansion and to use common sense about the impending safety risks. He asked
that an end be put to this issue for good and that Christ Presbyterian Church explore other
solutions. He asked that the proposal receive a no vote from the Council.
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Mayor Smith noted a pressing problem in this town is traffic. Where a family had one car,
now there are two. He asked clarification of Sunday traffic on West 70th Street at a projected
71 % increase and evening traffic at 50 %. Mr. Jarvis clarified the 71 % figure is only an increase
during the weekday peak hour. Mr. Benshoof affirmed during the Sunday church peak time,
traffic is significant. A need exists for Police control to accommodate traffic movements and
to insure safety even after the expansion program. He does not anticipate change in terms of
quality of service on and off 70th Street. Mr. Jarvis added the image of 70th Street is different
to each person. He asked the exhibits be examined carefully (post development Sunday trips,
to and from church section, 8:00 A.M. to 12:40 P.M. - 41/2 hour period) and noted the number
is the percentage of comparison between the interchange with the freeway and the church
parking entrance, not east of the entrance.
Member Maetzold asked to what extent the expansion is driven by the need to contemporize
church design. What is driving the Phase II expansion, modernizing church design or church
growth. Mr. Jarvis said this is the first expansion proposed in 30 years and he would
anticipate it is the maximum addition for administrative and classroom space, and built in
response to anticipated growth at approximately 5 %. Construction of Phase II is projected in
5 - 7 years. The narthex is considered a gathering space for fellowship to take place
comfortably. Gary Tushie said much of the design is not driven by expansion needs but by
programming and CPC's philosophy. Having services on a Friday or Saturday may be
common in other churches, but CPC wishes to feel more like a community with less services
on Sunday and everybody under one roof.
Member Faust reminded Council she has been looking at CPC for ten years. She asked the
present width of 69th Street; if a 24 foot road was their desire; would it include curb and
gutter, and what would be the estimated cost. Engineer Hoffman answered 69th Street is
currently a 30 foot road and if relocation of the street at 24 foot is approved, parking would
be prohibited on both sides. The road would include curb and gutter and cost approximately
$40,000. Member Faust asked if the City usually gives land away to developers. Planner
Larsen referred to the vacation of the existing right -of -way that, 1) vacate when no public
purpose exists for the right -of -way and 2) this would be a trade of existing right -of -way for
replacement right -of -way. Member Faust asked for clarification on the replacement right -of-
way is 6 ft X the length of the road less than the City's portion. Planner Larsen explained the
modest difference in the existing 69th Street right -of -way is 60 feet and the right -of -way for
the proposed street is 50 feet or 10 feet narrower in the part the public controls. Attorney
Page 13
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Gilligan said the City does not own the land but have a right to use if for street purposes. We
can't sell it but we can vacate it in exchange for another dedication of another right -of -way.
Member Kelly asked what change has been made to the building footprint in response to the
neighborhood. Mr. Jarvis that answered from April 1997 to December 1997, the sanctuary
size has been reduced by 14 %, the basement level reduced by 14 %, the balcony size reduced
by 3%, and the sanctuary seating reduced from approximately 1100 -1260 to 951 while the
architecture remains the same. The total reduction in the Phase I proposal was 12% in direct
response from neighbors input. Member Kelly asked when Options One through Four were
presented. Peter Jarvis said the Master Plan was presented to the neighborhood at two
meetings in April 1997. Changes took place on the Plan from July 1997 - December 1997 when
a complete redesign process was completed. The redesigned plan was presented to the
neighborhood and the Planning Commission in January, 1998.
Steve Brown reiterated since the neighborhood has been involved the plan for the physical
building has not changed.
Member Hovland asked how long will CPC's growth rate be at 7 -8% and what is the
projected time capacity will be reached at the present location. Ms. Bowles said an
anticipated capacity would be difficult to forecast, but the proposed facility will meet today's
needs and allow flexibility with the church's programming. The church has committed to this
location indefinitely and the financial investment is huge. If capacity were ever reached,
other options would need to be considered such as relocation or satellites.
Mayor Smith inquired what regulations relate to building height and mass in this situation.
Planner Larsen said there are no regulations relating to height of the steeple. Buildings in this
zone are limited in height to 40 feet. He referred to the original staff report that pointed out
the building measures at 43 feet requiring a 3 foot height variance or similar to the main
sanctuary at the Colonial Church complex.
Member Maetzold asked besides the 3 foot height variance does the remainder of the
proposed expansion comply with our Comprehensive Plan, the Watershed District, etc.
Planner Larsen said the proposal complies with the Zoning Code and approval of the
Watershed District would follow Council action.
Member Faust asked what if any variances would be required on the original 6.8 acre site.
Planner Larsen said the same height variance would be required. The Code has two layers
with parking; one space is required for each three seats of sanctuary plus enough spaces to
handle concurrently occurring activities. The 950 seat sanctuary would require
approximately 317 spaces at a minimum. 350 spaces exist in CPC's parking lot now with 33
handling concurrent activities. The lot is stressed now, and spills out into the neighborhood.
He believes there may be a parking shortage and that a variance may be necessary in the
future. In staffs' opinion keeping all parking on site is desirable and 200 additional spaces
would add the necessary cushion.
Page 14
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Member Kelly asked if an hourly traffic study had been done on 701h Street. Mr. Benshoof
pointed out two studies were taken at the church driveway location as related to traffic on
70th Street, but nothing broken down by hour. Member Kelly inquired whether a study had
been done of traffic through neighborhoods. Mr. Benshoof said a traffic study was done in
and out from 699, Street and traffic using Dunberry to the east or Brittany north but no count
was made exiting onto 70th Street.
Member Hovland asked how much of the east hillside would be taken to create additional
parking. Mr. Jarvis said very little as the lot will be elevated approximately 3 feet. Normally a
parking lot would be placed 30 feet from the residential lot line. Today the asphalt edge is 45
feet from the property line. Code requires a setback of 10 feet and the proposal would place
the landscaping at 30 feet. Member Hovland asked Mr. Jarvis if he was in concurrence with
the curb cut remaining in the same location. Mr. Jarvis said CPC would-work with Engineer
Hoffman and construct the curb cut where the City wants it. Mr. Jarvis clarified that some
Planning Commission members thought the curb cut lined up with the intersection of the
frontage road. It never has lined up. The intersection is dead -on into the first lot. The
proposal is to move it one lot and would create a problem for Mr. Barck with headlights
shining into his home with every left turn. In the future he would see lights as they approach,
but CPC has offered to plant sizable spruce trees in his front yard to block headlights. An
unidentified man who lives east of Mr. Barck told the proposed change will also have an
adverse affect on his home. Mr. Jarvis said the home the curb cut lines up with is to the west
of Mr. Barck's property.
Mayor Smith asked if an inventory was done on the development as it exists or consideration
given to tearing down and reconfiguring the structure for ultimate efficiency. Mr. Jarvis
commented that in the 1994 -95 analysis, an unbelievable amount of inventory has been done
of every square foot of the building, i.e. how is it used, what time of day is it used, for what
function is it used, and by what age and group type is it used. The same inventory was done
with parking and landscaping. Mr. Jarvis emphasized the building is used efficiently. Mayor
Smith asked if the first sanctuary could be razed and rebuilt as two stories. Mr. Jarvis said
code would not allow rebuilding because of the taking of land, in the 1970's by Mn /DOT. A
portion of the east side of the building, none of which is affected by the! current proposal, no
longer meets the setback requirement of 50 feet after the land was taken. Tearing down
functional space and replacing it with a taller building does not seem like more space would
be created and would be very costly.
Member Maetzold asked what traffic on 701h Street and the neighborhood will look like in 5 -
7 years based on CPC's steady growth. Mr. Benshoof said forecasts for post development .
volumes focus on Sunday and account for changes/ increases associated with CPC traffic.
Other development in the area whether it be retail, office, or residential, the increase in traffic
volumes on 701h Street are principally weekday related traffic generation. Member Maetzold
asked if a detrimental increase in traffic would be generated by_ CPC--in-5-7 _years. Mr.
-- Bensloof replied not in terms of impacting 70th Street to the east. The increase would
principally occur between the driveway and Highway 100 interchange. The level of increase
of church traffic on a Sunday morning east of the driveway along the residential area to the
Page 15
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
east on 701h, is about 100 vehicles in a 41/2 hr period from 8:00 A.M.- 12:30 P.M. 100 vehicles
spread over that time span is quite indistinguishable.
Member Hovland asked what the average traffic volumes are for streets in the Woodhill area.
Engineer Hoffman said typically volumes would be 200 - 500 trips per day. Maple Road is
1000 cars per day; Country Club area at approximately 300; Wooddale 2000; Arden and
Bruce 300 - 700. People begin to notice traffic when volumes reach 500 and at 1000 cars per
day. At 1000 residents begin talking about STOP signs, and more street . control. With
implementation of ramp meters, residents are using neighborhood streets rather than
freeways. Traffic on 70th has increased dramatically. Member Hovland asked if data was
available detailing the increase has been on an annual basis in residential neighborhoods.
Engineer Hoffman said consultants the City has used say the volume has increased from 8 -10
trips per household to 13 -14 trips per day per household.
Member Maetzold asked if the CPC proposal is approved, would Phase II come back for
approval at a later date. Member. Larsen said the proposal is for Phase I and Phase II.
RESIDENT COMMENTS:
Eugene Huntstiger, 4809 Roycar Road, asked if the proposed relocation of 69th Street includes
sewer, water and gas. Engineer Hoffman said if the vacation is approved and the street is
moved, staff would recommend maintaining rights for ' sewer and water and rights for
Minnegasco, USWest, Paragon Cable and NSP to maintain their facilities. If CPC wanted the
utilities moved the cost, of the move would be CPC's.
John Rogan, 4720 West 70th Street, twenty year resident, suggested traffic could go east go
across Highway 100 and come down the service road' onto Highway 100, "or east ,or west on
70th, or onto the frontage road south. He further does not agree with taking property off the
tax roles. The church should build on the existing footprint. He asked why not have Saturday
services now rather than later.
Ann Oliver, 4509 Laguna Drive, 12 year resident, said there is a significant increase in traffic
during rush hour when CPC does not schedule programming.
John Hoyt, 4812 Dunberry Lane, lives in the third closest house to CPC. He has written two
letters to the Council regarding the proposed expansion. He noted, 1) no one from CPC has
visited them, 2) CPC wants to reduce Sunday services from 3 to 2, representing an immediate
peak increase in traffic, and 3) he has no objection to parking on Dunberry as long as they
don't drive on his grass. _
Evelyn Ray, 4801 West 70th Street, said their objection to the proposal is traffic during rush
hour. They cannot open their front windows because of noise and traffic. If an emergency
were to occur during rush hour, it would be impossible to get out of their driveway for help.
Ms. Ray schedules appointments with clients after 9 A.M. as she could never guarantee
getting out of her driveway. When the church building is larger, larger groups can use the
facility. The church has said their property value will not depreciate but their realtor told
Page 16
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
them they made a 15 - 20% donation to CPC without a tax write -off. The four homes on 7011,
Street feel ignored.
Kirsten Teaple, 4717 West 281h Street, St. Louis Park, a CPC member made a plea for
additional space the church needs. Shuttling back and forth between Cornelia and leaving
their baby in the church in order to take a class is worrisome as well as difficult juggling car
seats, etc. Socialization in the narthex is difficult at best with the tremendous overcrowding.
She asked for approval of the expansion so families can take advantage of the programs.
Kurt Smith, 6600 West Shore Drive, a twenty year resident, ' said he is a real estate
professional. with a specialty in hotels, is licensed as a real estate broker, is a certified general
real estate appraiser and operates a division of a management company that runs hotels. On
a number of occasions he has been invited to do site location research studies. He has done a
study on membership at Colonial Church and believes a parallel can be drawn to CPC. A
mathematical model can be drawn of the service area of a church. The greatest draw to a
church is in the immediate area; 60% come from within a 5 mile radius. He examined
Colonial Church when it was on Wooddale Avenue and the new site on Tracy. The original
site attracted members in a 3 mile radius in a circular shape vs the Tracy site which became
elliptical. The expansion will exceed this community and no doubt reach south to the river
and further to the north while most traffic will come off the expressway not through the
neighborhood. The area east is primarily commercial, the north has a large recreational area
and the rest is bounded by the expressways serving as barriers. The church is fortunate with
its location. Expansion of the facility will not drive growth. In 1987 Colonial expanded 100%
and lost 50% of their attendance. Mr. Smith has attended CPC and voiced concern with the
safety of pedestrians walking in the street between parked cars on both sides and being
followed by a car looking for a parking space.
Mayor Smith asked who should pay for the sidewalks. Mr. Smith said residents on 66th Street
were assessed for sidewalk installation in 1997, but he believes the sidewalks are more for the
greater community than only their street.
Kristi Kuehn, 4813 Upper Terrace, and a student at Gustavus Adolphus College equated the
planned construction of the church expansion to the war -zone devastation St. Peter received
from the April tornado. She asked that the small charming neighborhood be maintained and
the neighbors be respected during construction.
Karol Schneider, 6905 West Shore Drive, works often at Cornelia School and opposes the
expansion. The common denominator in the neighborhood. is traffic with the encroachment
of commercialism on all four sides as well as the unknown quality.
Bruce McPheeters, 4920 Poppy Lane, stated anyone can build parks or schools, but a vibrant
church is an asset. He noted how many Edina churches had expanded over the years where
-CPC has not. The expansion will not be as large as some others and CPC's location near a
highway is a plus. What a nice problem this expansion is to make a decision out of prosperity
not out of adversity. When looking at the church across from Byerly's, a wrong message is
given that churches are dead.
Page 17
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Jan Doudiet, 5800 Long Brake Trail, moved to Edina 9 1/2 years ago because of schools,
community, the commute, shopping and church. A plus for CPC is its location on the
perimeter of a neighborhood with access from Highway 100 and 70th.
Rick Cornelisse, 6633 Southcrest Drive, was told by his neighbors that the expansion issue
would never get to the Council because the land issue would be resolved as it had been in the
past. They were wrong. Two hundred residents have asked for no expansion but, yes to the
dynamics of CPC. He said expansion is fine within the confines of the land.
Don Barck, 4807 West 70th Street, said four residents on the south side of CPC have a
combined residency of 125 years. The church can expand, but he disagrees with the size of
the curb cut and locating it right in front of his house. Planning Commission discussed
leaving the curb cut intact or moving it further west. Traffic exiting the lot in the winter (with
16 hours of darkness) headlights shine directly into the Barck's windows. He asked that the
curb cut be moved to the east side of his property.
Unidentified resident on 4816 Wilford Way, bought their home recently as it went on the
market one month after CPC made their expansion plans known. The proposed expansion
has been a wonderful way to meet neighbors. She daily observes two signs, 1) neighborhood
meeting and a 2) Conditional Use Permit sign. She voiced concern that the safety and
livability of the area be maintained during and after the construction.
Bill Hamer, 4709 Upper Terrace, an 18 year resident, stated strong churches are essential to
the City. He quoted from the Star Tribune and the impact religion has on youth. This would
be the first land use expansion in 40 years. Traffic is a serious problem and has been
exacerbated with commercial expansion along 70th Street. He asked if the City has the
responsibility to provide this type of facility for its residents. Mayor Smith says no it is the
responsibility of the individual churches.
Joe Florenzano, 4712 West 701h Street, a 20 year resident, voiced concern with traffic. He
attended Council 10 years ago on the same issue. Looking at the growth in Edina and the
difficulty getting out of a driveway, where do you draw the line.
Therese Kakarias, 6825 West Shore Drive, an 8 year resident voiced concern with 1) safety
because she has small children, 2) tremendous traffic for residents 24 hours a day, 3) CPC has
the right to expand on their property, 4) neighborly of CPC to provide landscaping and use
of low glare lighting, 5) not in families best interest to add more hard surface parking, 6)
endless construction noise and dust and 7) increase in traffic affects their quality of life.
Sandy Kuehn, 4813 Upper Terrace, said her family has experienced the same growing pains
as CPC. She suggested expanding the number of services. Cars backing up in lots is
dangerous and her church asks families with small children to park on side streets near
church. While she can appreciate all CPC's concerns, she disagrees with the taking of green
space, traffic, shrinking of the neighborhood, and loss of homes. CPC have not been good
neighbors, their property has dead grass, leaves have never been picked up, downed
Page 18
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
branches from a storm were not cleaned up and there is rampant dandelion growth. The
rental home on 6911, and frontage road rarely shovels its. driveway, garbage cans were left in
the driveway for days, dogs roamed the neighborhood, and a car sat on the grass with a tarp
partially covering it. The church has represented their property as an eyesore. Is it not hard to
see why neighbors are unhappy. She further asked where are the 3,000, members when it is
time to take care of their property. Ms. Kuehn said the plan discussed tonight involves only
land south of West 69th Street causing removal of three homes and building of a parking lot
and replaces nothing. Neighbors have, no assurance CPC will come back with a plan. CPC
has said they purchased the Marty property. for subdivision, but CPC's representatives said a
private individual is the purchaser. The spirituality of the church has nothing to do with the
size of the building. Her husband is in real estate and has someone interested in the property
and for use as a satellite church. CPC could add services, move the administrative offices to
home they own and use office space for Sunday School. Why not smaller expansion within
the footprint. Maybe its time to look for new church home.
Skip Nelson, 4816 Dunberry Lane, said Webster's definition of a neighborhood is an area
where .one lives next to another. Growing up in a neighborhood meant a place to play
baseball and sell lemonade, today it is a comfortable place that provides security as neighbors
become friends, as well as a quality of life issue. He challenged the Council to vote on their
definition of neighborhood.
Suzanne Irene, 4817 Dunberry Lane, pointed out her home will be tremendously impacted
with the expansion of CPC. She inquired of Member Faust if the controversy tonight now is
the same as 10 years ago. Her recollection was that CPC said that they would not need
anything more. Plantings promised 10 years ago for the site were never completed, or were
never cared for and died out. When the promises were not kept there was no one from CPC
to go to for help. She inquired if the Council would be available for neighborhood input if
promises are not kept. She noted only one letter of correspondence had been dropped at her
door from the church.
Mayor Smith said he was on the Council when the previous expansion took place. City staff
monitors projects during construction and he has no recollection that residents were
unhappy with the project.
Colleen and Margaret Gallagher, 6812 Brittany Road, live next to, the home proposed to be
purchased and subdivided. Their home was built in 1965 and is a 100 X 300 lot. A developer
in 1973 attempted to purchase a portion of the' lot. They did not sell it. The developer donated
his property to the church. Their home has much glass and will, if the expansion occurs, look
over CPC's parking lot. In 1989 a planned parking agreement was put in place to protect the
neighborhood. It was never enforced.
Dean Kovack, 6817 Normandale Road, at the onset of this process, Ms. Bowles the church
- -------- - - - - -- the-church
wanted - -to reduce services from-3 to 2, allowing for coffee time and adult education. The
planned expansion would make his lot a corner lot. He did not buy a corner lot, nor does he
want a street next to him with more traffic. A strong message is sent to a neighborhood if an
entity buys homes for the sake of tearing them down. Everybody in Woodhill and south of
Page 19
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
701h will be directly affected. He met with the Pastor, a family friend and CPC member, and
his wife and explained their concern with the lack of care of the rental property next door.
Over a six week period he had to make many calls to finally get the job done. He cares for an
elderly neighbors lot now and does not want the added responsibility of more CPC property.
Mr. Kovack supports the proposal Steve Brown presented to the Council and reiterated he
does not want to five on a corner lot.
Fred Little, 4725 Dunberry, a 14 year resident. sees the key issue as organizational change.
CPC has been very successful, they have good leadership, and are projecting significant
growth over the next several years and hats off to them. The church has changed and they
are going through a space crunch. The Council should remember that this issue could come
up again in 5 - 7 years. He suggested a satellite church be considered. Mr. Little reminded the
Council that 200 signatures were gathered opposing the expansion.
Floyd Grabiel, 4817 Wilford Way, stated he has heard numerous comments on what CPC
should do with their services. It is not the problem of the City but is internal church stuff. In
defense of Mr. Jarvis, when he called Mr. Jarvis for a meeting, he came and explained the
program and feels the church has been responsive with respect to their proposals. He wrote
the Council in opposition to the April 1997 proposal and believe the church has moved a long
way in response to neighbors concerns in terms of landscaping, design, etc. If the proposal
presented tonight is recommended by the Planning Commission with conditions, it would be
a plus for the neighborhood and he would be in favor of it.
Marsha Kuhn, 4813 Wilford Way, said she has had concerns but the church has done a great
deal to change the minds of the everyone in the neighborhood in response to these concerns..
One thing not responding to the neighborhood is the proposal to relocate 69t" Street. The
neighbors are saying expand the church on the site, but do not cross 69th Street. Parking in
front of her home is all right. Edina has a lot of parking, i.e. Cornelia School, the industrial
park, and in the Especially for Children's lot. While these may require busing, why not teach
preservation of the environment and not over -pave the area.
Tom Carrico, 4816 Roycar Road, said his concern is with stormwater drainage on the site
with the expansion from 1% to 8% of the site. Engineer Hoffman said the issue is being
studied. Mr. Carrico was disturbed CPC would still need to have police for traffic control on
Sunday mornings. He supports the petition presented and worries the parking agreement
completed in 1989 will be thrown away, that shows the spaces allowable on the site for
parking. If the 1989 agreement is adhered to CPC should have adequate space to expand. .
John Mitchell, 4809 West 66th Street, after growing up in the area, the schools and churches in
the area brought him back. 70th Street cut through traffic is not compounded by the churches
use. He sees the proposal as greatly enhancing safe parking within the site and not City
streets with no sidewalks. His family has attended every meeting held and issues have
changed, in terms where CPC has tried to address concerns from of the neighborhood.
Access on 69th Street to Brittany has improved in the plan presented tonight. In terms of a
dedicated street with the relocation works for emergency vehicles and the neighborhood. At
a meeting on a Saturday, called for input from neighbors, a question was posed about what
Page 20
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
was going to happen on the north side; and would CPC continue marching up the hill. Being
a CPC member and a resident of the neighborhood is awkward, but when questioned, he
responded, 1) the church is perceived as a moving target, residents need a solution, i.e.
purchase of Marty property and two new lots developed will only be beneficial, 2) CPC has
not been the best neighbor, but the proposed plan with irrigation is a tremendous
improvement, 3) church growth has historically taken in the same number of new members
from Edina as from neighboring communities, 4) this is an intensive process for everyone, the
Planning Commission and staff have done a good job and asked endorsement of the Planning
Commission's recommendation.
Marty Probst, 6629 Brittany Road, said many promises have been broken in the past and he
has heard tonight that all on- street parking would be eliminated with the plan presented.
CPC currently has 350 parking spots for a 300 seat sanctuary admittedly a serious problem.
Scores of people are bussed from Cornelia for 3 services. If CPC is allowed to expand by three
times to 950 plus, but only increase parking by 200 spots a problem exists today. When there
are only two services the ratio is much worse. With the current building expansion and with
2 services, CPC would be at capacity immediately, forgetting future growth. Mr. Probst
projected CPC would need to purchase 8 -10 homes for their future expansion.
COUNCIL COMMENT:
Mayor Smith thanked everyone for their presentation and respect to the process. His belief is
that the City's business is done during Council meetings and he has not met with anyone
over the issue in advance. On one occasion he chatted at length with Pastor John Crosby of
Christ Presbyterian about his successful church. Mayor Smith presented pictures of a full
parking lot on a Tuesday morning at CPC and said CPC is obviously doing something right.
Pastor Crosby said the Tuesday morning group is a community -wide Bible Study Fellowship.
This would be the largest "peak" during the week for church usage.
Member Hovland asked if the two new lot dimensions are satisfactory to the City. Planner
Larsen said on initial review of the four lot subdivision, (two old lots and creation of two new
lots) three of the four would require lot width variances but would meet lot depths. No staff
report has been completed on the lots as the application has just recently been received.
Member Hovland asked how much of a variance would be considered. Planner Larsen said
the neighborhood standard is 90 feet width and the proposed lots are 83 -85 feet in width.
Member Hovland inquired whether there are other 83 -85 foot lots in the neighborhood.
Planner Larsen said he believes there are but the application has not been reviewed. Straight
north of the property, along the frontage road and Brittany lots are quite large, moving east
lots are smaller and more uniform.
Member Hovland inquired if the association has made their proposal to the church. Steve
Brown answered no. Member Hovland stated the proponents saw the association plan at the
same time the Council did. Member Hovland asked Mr. Brown the Association's view of a
parking ramp. Mr. Brown said it was suggested to cap membership at CPC, in his view it has
been capped by 6911, Street as they presented. The Association has not discussed a ramp and
he personally would not favor a ramp, i.e. safety, cost and a commercial type of density.
More cars on the site is the crux of their opposition.
Page 21
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Member Hovland asked for more information on 69th Street landscaping reaching to the top
of the hill, south. Mr. Jarvis reiterated there would be extensive landscaping and it was an
oversite that it was not depicted on the drawing. Member Hovland asked about residents on
West 70fl, left out of the landscaping plan. Mr. Jarvis said he isn't sure they were left out. The
most change is to Mr. Kovak. The next door neighbor has a driveway dead - center on their
home. The proposal, as drawn, moves the driveway one lot east taking it off that' property
and aims it at the Kovak home. They believe, after conversations with Mr. Kovak; that
headlights shining into the Barck home can be mitigated with spruce trees. If the proposal is
approved and if the curb cut negatively affects other neighbors, additional landscaping could
be provided. Mr. Jarvis noted the driveway move is in response to staff and his concern that
not enough space remains between the intersection and the frontage road to the south.
Member Hovland voiced concern with the Kovacs property` being made a corner lot. Mr.
Jarvis said by moving the road approximately 80 feet north on the east side and 120 feet
north on the west, the church owns up to the Kovac property which is at a different
north/ south line than all lots on the east side of the subdivision by accident of 1950's
platting. Mr. Kovacs lot does become a corner lot, but landscaping will go a long way in
mitigating intrusion. Member Hovland inquired whether the property will diminish in value
because the road is 80 feet closer to his property. Mr. Jarvis noted that many realtors believe
corner lots are larger and more valuable. He said CPC has not spoken to Mr. Kovak about the
diminution of value of his property. Mr. Kovak said since the church purchased the home, of
the three families that lived there two have had young children which has been a plus for
playmates. He resents the loss of homes and having to drive to find playmates for his
children. The corner lot on the frontage road puts his children even closer to the street.
Member Hovland asked if the home next to his home was on the market for over a year .until
the church bought it. Mr. Kovak answered no. Member Hovland asked if the new road
would be built before the old one is demolished. Engineer Hoffman noted that is the intent.
Member Hovland asked if sidewalk installation is being considered in the Woodhill
neighborhood. Steve Brown said none have been considered.
Member Faust thanked residents for their letters and interest in government. CPC is ,a
wonderfully respected part of the community and she is willing to consider their expansion.
She has studied the church for 10 years and has not changed her opinion. The church should
not expand beyond 69�h Street. They can expand on their site and infringing on the
neighborhood is unfair. She would vote to preserve the neighborhood.
Member Maetzold said he supports the recommendation of the Planning Commission with
the exception of the curb cut on 701h Street. Much thought has been given to this proposal
over the past year and it comes to, 1) the development conforms to the Comprehensive Plan,
2) addition of the most extensive landscaping plan he has ever seen, 3) concept of parking
cars on site and off streets is positive, 4) nothing was heard from the neighbors about the
expansion adversely affecting neighborhood regarding traffic, 5) 69th Street layout is
positive, and has no suggestion to alleviate creation of the corner lot,_ and 6) the plan as
presented caps the development with the proposed Development Agreement between HRA
and the Church. He supports the expansion proposal.
Page 22
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Member Hovland said this is a difficult decision. He read the City Code regarding
Conditional Use, by definition it is, "use which is generally not suitable in a particular zoning
district, may under some circumstances and subject to conditions be suitable in a particular
district." He wondered what are the circumstances and conditions a permit may be issued.
Code Section 850.04 Subd. 4E has a seven part test:
1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental
to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. He believes
churches play a vital role in enhancing the general welfare of a community. Safety
is enhanced with the expansion, and with the parking ban proposed on the new
West 691h Street, West 70th Street and no parking would be allowed in
neighborhoods during the week, but would be allowed on Sundays.
2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages. He believes
CPC has adequately evaluated parking needs. He believes undue traffic hazards
will not be created with the expansion.
3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other
property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance. He does not want any property
to be diminished with the expansion. He is concerned with the Kovak property. In
correspondence received from the neighbors, they are concerned with their
property being diminished also. The assessor could find no proof homes were
diminished in value near a church in other Edina locations. Homes sold in the West
Shore area recently had regular increases in value since 1995. He believes the
location of CPC is ideal next to the freeway and on a minor arterial roadway.
4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other
property in the vicinity_. This item does not apply.
5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities.
Member Hovland said he sits on the I-494 Corridor Commission and traffic
volumes are increasing all over. He feels traffic burden in the Woodhill
neighborhood is not excessive and the church will not play a significant role traffic
on 70th Street.
6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in
which it is located as imposed by this Section. Member Hovland felt it conforms,
7. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He believes it is.
Member Hovland said he was concerned about the location of the curb -cut on the frontage
road and finds there is one. The Tuesday traffic situation could have better management
internally on CPC's lot. Perhaps banning right hand turns out of the curb cut on West 69th
Street and reroute them up the frontage road to 66th Street and around, or onto 70+h, rather
than through the neighborhood. The neighborhood should consider sidewalks also. He was
concerned about the lack of landscaping to protect the house at the corner of Brittany and
Dunberry after the road is moved but finds that will be done. The church has not been a good
caretaker of its property and he feels the neighborhood will benefit with the church getting
out of the rental business. He encouraged a compromise solution and would be in favor of
the proposed expansion with the conditions.
Member Kelly echoed Council comments. Many times the Council struggles with a lack of
information, this time it is not the case. He views the proposal as a land use, issue and
conditional use permits should be viewed as an exception to the rule. He has to be
Page 23
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
comfortable that justification exists for an exception to the rule and that all efforts have been
taken to resolve the matter that would not require an exception. He does not believe this has
been done. Member Kelly stated upon examination, he came up with opposite conclusions: 1)
7300 block of West Shore Drive is not Woodhill and is not impacted, in his opinion. 2) St,.
Patrick's Church is half the size of the planned expansion of CPC on a lot twice the size, 3)
CPC is asking to build the largest church in Edina, substantially larger than Our Lady of
Grace, including the school. This is not minimizing an exception it is over - building a site.
CPC claims in order to seat 951 members, they need a sanctuary that is 15,000 s.f. which
seems very generous and to him is closer to 19,000 s.f. The square footage is more than Grace,
Our Lady of Grace, Colonial, or St. Patrick's need to seat in excess of 1000 members. He has
real concern with the design of the facility and whether it maximizes the site. If square
footage of the sanctuary and floor below the sanctuary are added together, it is essentially
two sanctuaries. Member Kelly says meaningful compromise seems to be lost. The
landscaping looks terrific and the 6% reduction in gross building area is appreciated, but it
needs further reduction. He has heard residents say they do not object to the expansion, they
object to having the largest church in Edina on the smallest lot. CPC should look at the
existing space and not give the Woodhill neighborhood a Hobson s choice, each of which
would be unpalatable. He could not support the proposal in its present form.
Mayor Smith said since he has been in office, he has spoken of the idea of "growing small" or
how can we impact government. One resident asked how the Council felt about facilitating
church growth as a government official. Opportunities have come forth when City churches
have put their properties up for sale for multi-story office buildings. It is not the City's job to
help the church. sell their property to maximize their return. He voiced objection with the
impact on the neighborhood. Mayor Smith said 1) he commiserates with the neighbor being
forced to have a corner house and therefore into a different tax structure, 2) it bothers him
that the promises to a resident about landscaping and cleaning up of church property have
not been kept, but CPC is so honest they admit they have not been good landlords, and 3) he
is happy there is a process to follow for the Planning Commission, the residents and the
Council. The way the process has worked so far tonight, there are two votes for and two
votes against. He said he could vote not because he is not happy with where we are at this
point, there are things the church can do and suggested his willingness to allow them the
time needed. Mayor Smith said he sincerely believes a meaningful compromise can be
reached.
Peter Jarvis said reconsideration is better than a no vote. He said he needs a definition of
compromise. What he has heard is the church, has the support of the neighborhood as long
as nothing happens north of 69th Street. He doesn't understand how that is compromise,
unless the definition of compromise is that irrespective of property ownership either for a
year or 15 years a line 85 feet up the road is the end of the road for that neighborhood. To
continue this proposal for 60 days is like a year from a construction standpoint. Tonight was
the first time the neighborhood has presented a proposal. They suggested a two week
continuance and would return at that meeting with a status report. Extending action into
June would create a problem with the delivery of steel, and any construction would need to
be in winter, but this is riot the Council's problem.
Page 24
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Mayor Smith emphasized that conversations be held with neighbors to the site regarding
headlights and landscaping. He offered that trees do not make a good compromise, the mass
is too big. He suggested the matter be continued to June 1.
Planner Larsen pointed out the 120 days to act on the proposal expires on June 12, 1998.
Attorney Gilligan noted approval would have to be given to extend action beyond June 12.
Steve Brown said a two weeks or four weeks would be fine with the Association to receive a
status report from the proponent but he does not know if the church will entertain any other
direction.
Member Kelly again reminded everyone that meaningful change is necessary.
Member Faust reminded Council she would not be attending the May 18,1998, meeting.
Mayor Smith suggested continuing the meeting to June 1 to receive a status report from
Christ Presbyterian Church.
Member Kelly made a motion to continue the consideration of the Conditional Use Permit
for Christ Presbyterian Church, 6901 Normandale Road, Building and Parking Lot
Expansion, generally located north of West 701h Street and East of Highway 100 and the
vacation of a portion of West 691h Street until June 1, 1998. Member Faust seconded the
Motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES NINTH
ADDITION - LAUKKA TARVIS, INC. Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file.
Planner Larsen explained the proposed plat would approve building 10, a,13 unit building in
the Centennial Lakes Ninth Addition for Laukka Jarvis, Inc. Approval would mean that 87
units of the 98 unit development have been approved for construction. The proposed- plan is
consistent with the approved overall development plan.
Member Hovland left the Council Chambers at 1:49 A.M.
Member Faust introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 9TH ADDITION:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, "THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 9TH ADDITION",
- -
--platted by- Centennial Land Partnershipa Minnesota limited partnership, an undivided
91.43% interest, and John W. Hedberg, an undivided 8.57% interest, and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, public body corporate and politic under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of the City
Page 25
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Council on May 4, 1998, be and is hereby
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Kelly, Smith
Abstaining: Maetzold
Resolution adopted.
granted final plat approval. Member Kelly
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR TMS EQUITIES (49084910 MALIBU DRIVE) Member
Maetzold introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Faust and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels
(herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
PARCEL A:
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying northerly of a line which
bears North 53 degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds East, assumed bearing, from a point
on the west line of said lot distant 28.05 feet north of the southwest corner of said
lot. For purposes. of this description the west lot line bears South 2 degrees 25
minutes 13 seconds East.
PARCEL B:
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County
Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying southerly of a line which
bears North 53 degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds East, assumed bearing, from a point
on the west line of said lot distant 28.05 feet north of the southwest corner of said
lot. For purposes of this description the west lot line bears South 2 degrees 25
minutes 13 seconds East.
WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has
been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of - the
City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of
land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as
contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
conveyance and ownership of the separate above described Parcels as separate tracts of
land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and
810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of
land but only to the extent permitted under Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 subject
to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
Page 26
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED 6608 AND 6612 PARKWOOD ROAD (WILLIAM AND
MARGARET TOAS) Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution, seconded by
Member Faust and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the following described tracts of land constitute separate parcels:
PARrm. A-
Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
And
PARCEL B:
Lot 8, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to divide said tracts into the
following described separate parcels:
PARCEL A:
Lot 8, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof
and
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying westerly of a line
drawn from a point on the northerly line of said Lot 7, distant 11.00 feet
southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 7, thence southwesterly to
the most westerly corner of said Lot 7,
and
PARCEL B:
Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, except that part of said Lot 7,
lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the northern line of said Lot 7,,
distant 11.00 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 7, thence
southwesterly to the most westerly corner of said Lot 7.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as
separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Section 810 and 850.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved
and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby
waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not
waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in
Page 27
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 41h day of May, 1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 18, .1998, FOR FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL - NAMRON COMPANY (51xx LINCOLN DRIVE) Motion made by Member
Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust setting May 18, 1998, as hearing date for final
rezoning and final plat approval for Namron Company at 51XX Lincoln Drive.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO 19984 ADOPTED - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTION
460 - SIGNS Planner Larsen indicated the proposed amendment to Sign Ordinance Section
360 addresses two different issues. First, the. amendment establishes standards for
scoreboards within public parks, school properties and golf courses. The proposed standards
provide for integral sponsor panels only at Braemar Park, Van Valkenburg Park and
Kuhlman Field. Park Director Keprios has furnished a memo to be discussed later on the
agenda with additional information. Second, the amendment provides language addressing
the permitted locations for campaign signs. The proposed amendment was presented initially
at the April 20, 1998, Council meeting and is before the Council with minor changes. Staff
recommends adoption of the amendment.
Member Maetzold made a motion to adopt Ordinance 1998 -4, an Ordinance Amending
Code Section 460 - Signs with waiver of second reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1998-4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 460
OF THE CITY CODE TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR
SIGNS IN PUBLICLY OWNED PARKS AND TO
REGULATE THE PLACEMENT OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subd. 1 of Subsection 460.05 of the City Code is amended by adding the
following regulations:
"TYPE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
NUMBER AREA HEIGHT
Public Park One per frontage 24 sq. ft. 6 ft.
Identification
SCOREBOARDS:
A. Field #1
(Courtney Fields)
B. Van Valkenburg Park,
Kuhlman Field and
Braemar Park except
Field #1 at Courtney
One
One per field
Fields
C. All other public parks, One per field
Page 28
400 sq. ft. 20 ft.
(including
sponsor panels
200 sq. ft. 20 ft.
(including
sponsor panels)
100 sq. ft. 20 ft.
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
schools and golf courses
Public park scoreboard 25% of scoreboard
sponsor panels and other area"
scoreboard advertising
Section 2. Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 24
as follows:
"Subd. 24. Scoreboard Sponsor Panels. Sponsor panels and other forms of
advertising on scoreboards are permitted only at Braemar Park, VanValkenburg Park and
Kuhlman Field. Scoreboard sponsor panels and other advertising on scoreboards shall be
integral to the scoreboard and shall be constructed of the same materials as the
scoreboard."
Section 3. Paragraph A of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended
to read as follows:
"A. No sign shall be placed within any street right -of -way other than, i)
governmental signs which are official traffic regulatory signs or, ii) campaign signs placed
pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection."
Section 4. Paragraph B of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended
to read as follows:
"B. No freestanding sign or any portion thereof other than governmental signs shall
be placed within 20 feet of the traveled portion of any public street provided that
campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection may be placed to within 10
feet of the traveled portion of a public street."
Section 5. Subd 4 of Subsection 460.03 is amended to read as follows:
"Subd. 4. Campaign Signs. Campaign signs shall comply with the following
requirements:
A. Campaign signs may be posted from August 1 in a state general election year
until 10 days following the state general election subject to the applicable
provisions of M.S. 211B.045. Such campaign signs shall conform with the
provisions of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03. No such sign shall be placed upon
the right -of -way without the consent of the abutting property owner.
B. Campaign signs posted in connection with elections held at times other than a
state general election are subject to the following.
i) Maximum Size - six square feet
ii) Maximum Number - one sign for each candidate per lot frontage
iii) Maximum Duration - 60 days prior to the election until seven days
following the election.
iv) Location - Such campaign signs shall conform with the provisions of
Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03. No such sign shall be placed upon the
right -of -way without the consent of the abutting property owner."
Section 6. This ordinance is in full effect upon passage and publication.
Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly_, Maetzold, Smith
Ordinance adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC ACTUATED CONTROL SYSTEM - WEST 76TH STREET
(IMP. TS -24) Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust for
Page 29
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
award of bid for traffic actuated control system at West 761h Street, Improvement No. TS-
24, to recommended low bidder, Ridgedale Electric, Inc., at $110,400.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*BID REJECTED FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM - WEST 66TH STREET BETWEEN FRANCE
AND YORK AVENUE (IMP. WM -385) Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded
by Member Faust to reject the bid for the -remaining irrigation system work at West 661h
Street between France and York Avenues (IMP. WM -385).
Motion carried on rollcall vote -. five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC WEEK TREATMENT Motion made by Member
Maetzold and seconded by Member, Faust for award of bid for aquatic weed treatment for
weed and algae control on 34 City lakes and ponds to recommended low bidder, Lake
Restoration, Inc., at $16,737.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SIGNAL EASEMENT - YORK AVENUE AT EDINA
LIQUOR STORE/CUB FOODS ENTRANCE Motion made by Member Maetzold,
seconded by Member Faust and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
GRANTING SIGNAL EASEMENT
TO HENNEPIN COUNTY
YORK AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a signal easement to
Hennepin County as follows:
"A permanent signal easement for signal purposes over the south ten meters (32.81
feet) of the West five meters (16.40 feet) of Lot 1, Block 1, YORKDALE SHOPPES,
according to the duly recorded plat thereof."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the
aforementioned easement.
Adopted this 4th day of May, 1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*WOODDALE PARK COMFORT STATION APPROVED -Motion made by Member
Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust approving the Park Board recommendation as
follows: "That per the neighborhood's suggestion we try portable toilets this summer and
see how it works and we will review it at the end. of the summer and stop construction of
the permanent facility at Wooddale Park."
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
BASEBALL SCOREBOARD ADVERTISING FOR COURTNEY BALL FIELD AT
BRAEMAR PARK APPROVED Director Keprios explained at the April 14,1998, Park Board
meeting, the Edina Baseball Association made a proposal to raise funds through the sale of
sponsor panels to replace four scoreboards at the Courtney ballfields in Braemar Park.
One concern voiced by staff at the Park Board meeting was the size of the scoreboard being
proposed for field #1 (9'4" x 36 "). Currently the scoreboard on field # is 5' x 16'. Following a
Page 30
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
discussion, the Park Board voted to unanimously approve the large scoreboard and the
proposed advertising concept for all four scoreboards.
The Board's recommendation is consistent with Council's two -year trial basis - fund - raising
through advertising - policy. Each advertising proposal requires prior approval of the
Council, in accordance with City policy.
Previously in the meeting, Ordinance No. 1998 -4, an Ordinance Amending Section 460 -
Signs, was adopted allowing advertising on certain scoreboards in the City.
Member Hovland made a motion approving advertising as a means of fund raising to
replace the four scoreboards at Courtney ballfields in Braemar Park, and to include the
large scoreboard on field #1. Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*TERMINATION OF TRAFFIC AGREEMENT FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES APPROVED
Motion made by Member Maetzold, seconded by Member Faust approving termination of
Traffic Agreement for Centennial Lakes in Edina and the Minnesota Center in
Bloomington.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 (PATROL OFFICERS) APPROVED Motion made by Member
Maetzold, seconded by Member Faust approving Teamsters Local #320 (Patrol Officers)
Labor Agreement effective January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1999.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*PUBLIC WORKS OPEN HOUSE MAY 16, 1998 (9:00 A.M. - 2:00 P.M.) Motion made by
Member Maetzold, seconded by Member Faust acknowledging the Public Works Open
House on May 16,1998, from 9:00 A.M. -1:00 P.M. as part of National Public Works Week
in the month of May.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
CLAIMS PAID Member Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the following
claims as shown detail on the Check Register dated May 1, 1998, and consisting of 31
pages: General Fund $361,489.34, Communications $4,054.13; Working Capital $55,194.08;
Art Center $16,639.66; Golf Dome Fund $209.36; Swimming Pool Fund $4,469.42, Golf
Course Fund $71,141.99; Ice Arena Fund $1,895.29; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes
$14,803.61; Utility Fund $54,594.05; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $776.40; Liquor Dispensary
fund $163,353.13; Construction Fund $3,472.51; Park Bond Fund $133,550.95; I494
Commission $4,178.60; TOTAL $889,822.52. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting
adjourned at 2:05 A.M.
Page 31
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998
Page 32
City Clerk
1(
A,
i
oe
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: May 18, 1998
Subject: Z -98 -1 & S -98 -1 Final
Rezoning and Final Plat Approval.
Namron Company LLC. 51XX Lincoln
Drive V
Recommendation:
Agenda Item: H.A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
®
Resolution
®
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval
conditioned on:
1. Executed Developers Agreement
2. Landscaping Bond
Information /Background
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans.
DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 29, 1998
S98 -1 & Z -98 -1 Final Rezoning & Final Plat
Namron Company LLC
51XX Lincoln Drive
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission City Council granted Preliminary Rezoning
and Plat approval for this 39 unit townhouse development on February 2, 1998. Mr.
Larsen noted the proponent has now submitted plans in support of his request for Final
Rezoning and Final Plat approval.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed site plan continues to illustrate development
of the northerly 2/3 acre of the site. If the proponent acquires the parcel, the project
could be enlarged by five units. The overall development density would not change.
Mr. Larsen stated adding these units would require Planning Commission review and
Council approval
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the proposed grading plan received approval
from the Nine Mile Watershed District.
Concluding, Mr. Larsen said the proposed plans are consistent with the plans
given preliminary approval and meet Ordinance standards for final approval. Staff
recommends approval subject to:
1. Executed Developer's Agreement
2. Landscaping Bond
The proponents, Mr. Bjornnes Sr. And Jr. were present to respond to questions.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if parking is permitted on the interior
streets. Mr. Larsen said parking is not permitted on the interior streets. Parking is
limited to guest area parking spaces, driveways, and on- street parking on Lincoln Drive.
Commissioner Swenson asked if the site will be sprinkled. Mr. Larsen said he
believes at this time the site will not be sprinkled. Mr. Larsen explained the City
requires a Landscaping Bond for three growing seasons if a site is not sprinkled, and if
sprinkled, two growing seasons.
Mr. Bjornnes Jr. interjected that at this time, unless unforeseen difficulties arise
the site will be sprinkled. Continuing, Mr. Bjornnes said he is uncertain about the
northerly two- thirds portion of this site, and if he will acquire it. Mr. Bjornnes reported
Mr. Kenneth (property owner of the northern piece of land) passed away, and that piece
of property is now in probate. Mr. Bjornnes stated he is the executor of the Kenneth
estate, reiterating he is not sure who will own the northerly piece after everything is
settled.
Mr. Bjornnes addressed the landscaping informing Commission Members the
site will be landscaped above what is required, adding he will continue to work with the
property owners on Malibu Drive to develop a landscaping plan that meets with their
approval.
Commissioner Ingwalson said in reviewing the landscaping plan he observed the
plantings along the Malibu property line are proposed to be planted with deciduous
trees, not coniferous. He stated in his opinion coniferous trees would better screen the
development from the property owners on Malibu. Mr. Bjornnes said a majority of the
Malibu lots are screened by the northern piece of the Kenneth property which is already
heavily screened with existing vegetation. Mr. Bjornnes reiterated he will continue to
meet with the Malibu property owners to create a plan that satisfies all parties.
Commissioner Swenson commented that she feels this proposal is superior to
the previous proposal, adding she is happy the office area was eliminated.
Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend Final Rezoning and Final Plat
approval subject to: 1)executed Developer's Agreement and 2) Landscaping Bond.
Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
LOCATION MAP
7 1;LKENSURG ;ariK
U`
.T
O_
1 1/ /
3 �
N 1 ■ / ■ 1
■ ■
s
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
NUMBER S -98 -1 and Z -98 -1
L 0 C A T 10 N 51XX Lincoln Drive
REQUEST Construct 42 rental townhomes
_J
,
J 1-
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
APRIL 29, 1998
S -98 -1 and Z -98 -1 Final Rezoning & Final Plat
Namron Company LLC
51XX Lincoln Drive
The City Council granted Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat
approval for this 39 unit townhouse development on February 2, 1998. The
proponent has now submitted plans in support of his request for Final Rezoning
and Final Plat approval.
The proposed unit count and site plan remain unchanged from the plans
which received preliminary approval. The four different unit styles include single
story units, front and rear walkouts, and 2 story units. Individual units range in
size from 1,100 square feet to 1,800 square feet. Exterior finish materials are
illustrated as a combination of lap siding and face brick. The materials will
closely match materials on the Lincoln Apartments to the south, which are also
owned by the proponent. The proponent has also submitted a landscaping plan
and schedule as required. The plan significantly exceeds ordinance
requirements both in terms of quantity and material sizes.
The proposed site plan continues to illustrate development of the northerly
2/3 acre of the site. At this writing the proponent does not control this parcel. If
he does acquire the parcel, the project could be enlarged by five units (the
original plan illustrated six units on this parcel). The overall development density
would not change. Adding these units would require Planning Commission
review and Council approval.
The proposed grading plan has received approval from Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed plans are consistent with plans given preliminary approval
and meet ordinance standards for final approval. No variances are required.
Staff would recommend that the three guest parking spaces along Lincoln Drive
be eliminated. Short term guest is allowed on the street.
Staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval subject to:
1. Executed Developer's Agreement
2. Landscaping Bond
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 2,1998 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, and Mayor
Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and
seconded by Member Hovland to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented
with the exception of Agenda Items IV.A. Resolution Authoring Acceptance of State Grant
Funding Police Overtime and IV.B. Tax Forfeit Property, Outlot B, Whiteman Addition.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TANUARY 20, 1998, APPROVED Motion
made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the City Council on January 20,1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR R -1 SINGLE
DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD -3, PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT FOR
NAMRON COMPANY LLC (51XX LINCOLN DRIVE), GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
LINCOLN DRIVE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Planner Larsen explained the subject site measures 5.1 acres in size, and is developed with a
single dwelling home located in the far north end of the site. The site is platted as an outlot
Properties to the west and south are zoned PRD -3 and are developed with apartment
buildings. Properties to the east are zoned PRD -2, and are developed with zero lot -line,
single dwelling homes. Properties to the north are double bungalow lots. The subject site is
shown as low density, multi- family in Edina's Comprehensive Plan.
Planner Larsen noted the proposed rezoning was continued by the Council at their January
20, 1998 meeting. The developer, in response to concerns raised by Council members, has
prepared a revised site plan for Council consideration. Planner Larsen reviewed the
following changes:
Density
The project unit count has been reduced to 39 units. The original site plan illustrated
eleven "B" units easterly of the proposed private drive. The revised plan illustrates
eight units in this area. Other changes to the site plan include the reduction of the "C"
units from fourteen to twelve and the increase of "D" units from four to six. The
revised site plan also eliminates the need for a building set back variance from the
north property line.
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
Member Faust thanked the developer for his efforts in responding to the concerns raised at
the January 20th Council meeting.
Member Kelly reiterated thanks to the developer for his willingness to resolve concerns.
Public Comment
Robert Crosby, 5020 Malibu Drive, explained he had two concerns relating to the proposed
development: 1) density, and 2) adequate landscaping between the existing single family
homes. Mr. Crosby believes the 39 -unit proposal is still too dense. He would also like to see
the existing trees salvaged between his home and the new development.
Member Hovland asked if subdivision dedication would be collected on this development.
Planner Larsen explained the subdivision dedication had been collected from this property at
an earlier time.
Motion by Member Maetzold, seconded by Member Hovland to grant first reading to
Ordinance No. 850 -A14, an ordinance rezoning the subject property from R -1, Single
Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residence District for Namron Company LLC.,
51XX Lincoln Drive.
Roll call:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
First Reading granted.
Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, "OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOME ", platted by Namron Company LLC
hereby granted preliminary plat approval with four conditions: 1) Final rezoning, 2) Final
Plat, 3) Watershed District Permits (noting final unit count may be reduced if on -site
ponding is required), and 4) Developer's Agreement for installation of sewer, water, and
improvements to Lincoln Drive. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Roll call:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
Member Maetzold left the meeting at 7:50 P.M. due to illness.
*HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 17, 1998, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion
made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland setting February 17,1998,
as the hearing date for the following planning matters:
1. Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRS4, Planned Residence
District and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Opus, National LLC and
Karrington Health Inc., 7128 France Avenue South (Lutheran Church of the
Master Site)
2. Final Development Plan, Guardian Savings, 6950 Xerxes Avenue.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
Page 3
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY. HALL
JANUARY 20,1998 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, and Mayor
Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded
by Member Faust to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented with the exception
of Agenda Item I. Approval of Minutes of Work Session of January 13, 1998, and Agenda
Item II.C. Release of Proof of Parking Agreement for 7301 Ohms Lane.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TANUARY 5,1998, APPROVED Motion made
by Member'Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust approving the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of the City Council on January 5,1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
MINUTES OF WORK SESSION OF TANUARY 13, 1998, APPROVED AS CORRECTED
Member Faust asked the Minutes of the Work Session of January 13, 1998, be removed from the
Consent Agenda for a correction on Page 2, Number 3, point 3 corrected to ($106,745) for the
Edina Schools / WMEP.
Member Faust made a motion approving the Minutes of the Work Session on January 13,
.1998, as corrected. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL CONTINUED TO
FEBRUARY 2, 1998, R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD -3, PLANNED.
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, FOR NAMRON COMPANY, LLC, (51XX LINCOLN DRIVE),
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF LINCOLN DRIVE Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file.
Planner Larsen explained the subject site measures 5.1 acres in size, and is developed with. a
single dwelling home located in the far north. end of the site. The site is platted as an outlot
Properties to the west and south are zoned PRD -3 and are developed with apartment buildings.
Properties to _the east are zoned _PRD -2, -and-are-developed with zero lot - line,_ single dwelling
homes. Properties to the north are double bungalow lots. The subject site is shown as low
density, multi- family in Edina's Comprehensive Plan.
The development proposal would rezone the southerly 4.4 acres of the site to PRD -3 to allow for
the development of a 42 -unit townhouse project. The existing home would remain, but could be
Minutes/Edina City CounciVf anuary 20,1998
The Council asked the developer what rents proposed are for the units, the expected
demographics of the tenants and the status of the Kenneth property. Mr. Bjornnes replied that
he expects tenants to be empty nesters 45 years and up and young professional_ s. Rent will
probably range between $1,200 -2,000 per month. He added the status of acquiring the Kenneth
property changes from day to day.
No one appeared to speak on the proposed development.
Mayor Smith reviewed the issues identified by the Council:
• Parking within the development needs to be increased,
• Density of the development,
• Grading of the site,
• Street Width/ Fire Lane.
Member Kelly stated he would be reluctant to vote favorably for the proposed development
with the density at 42 units. Member Faust indicated she agreed with Member Kelly.
Member Maetzold stated he believes the proposal is an excellent transition between the
apartments and the PRD -2 doubles up the hill and the zero lot lines on Malibu Drive.
Member Hovland indicated his support of the proposed development.
Mayor Smith explained to the proponent that a rezoning vote requires four of the five Council
members support. Mr. Bjornnes requested continuation of 'his proposal until February 2, 1998
allowing him to review the issues raised by the Council.
Member Maetzold made a motion to continue consideration of Preliminary Rezoning R -1,
Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Resident District and Preliminary Plat, for
Namron Company LLC, 51XX Lincoln Drive to February 2,1998.
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
PROOF OF PARKING AGREEMENT RELEASED FOR 7301 OHMS LANE Planner Larsen
explained the building located at 7301 Ohms Lane meets and exceeds the City's existing parking
requirements. If the land were vacant and the same building built today, no proof of parking
agreement would be required of the developer.
After a brief discussion of parking regulations and the potential impact of reducing the proof of
parking agreement for 7301 Ohms Lane, Member Faust made a motion to release the proof of
parking agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the necessary
Termination Agreement. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
Page 3
1
J
�1 " -J '
iy " 1 i
" _ 1
il�,� ,y_. ;Ili•';.: _
�• =� :,.:;•;�, "cif::;
,, .'�li� 1. .1r. � '�I' Y ✓
I
Y
Holz. Scale r = Mr
Oaks Lincoln TY owdhomes
0
F
e�
lilt
1 ,
"�
�l
I
I
V
M
t�
M
i
pb
I. M MI hn•
A. (1 11Anr
II1 A. M • IWA)
A• •
. O
UNIT t'
UNIT
TOTAL- 39 (PHASE ONE )
L.
TOTALS 45 (PHASE THO
5M AREA.
LOT ONE. 90 416 S.F. 02 ACRD
LOT T1.ID. 1� 19t 9.F. X17 ALRED
�+
A
TOTAL AR11�,i70 9.F
CH.
I
V
M
t�
M
NAMRON COMPANY LLC
401 Groveland Avenue • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 • (612) 874 -1102 • FAX (612) 874 -1054
TO: Craig Larsen, City of Edina
FROM: Norman Bjornnes, Jr.
DATE: January 29, 1998
RE: Summary of Changes to Oaks Lincoln Townhomes Site Plan
FILE: 9000 -39
1. Community rental office /business center deleted.
2. Housing units reduced from 42 to 39. Three B units
deleted from NE area of site. Two C units have been
changed to two D units. Anticipated landscaping is
shown, including side -to -side screening between
driveways.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
b98ja826
The B units are now grouped in two buildings of 4 units
each. In the old plan, there were two buildings of 6 and
5 units.
The northerly variance request is deleted.
The revised northerly B units building (4 units) has been
moved south and the southerly B units building (4 units)
has been moved west 15 feet and slightly north.
20 off - street parking spaces have been provided.
The grade has been changed from 7% to 5% to lower the
site to further mitigate view obstruction from the zero
lot lines homes to the east.
Revised counts:
Prior Plan
A- 13
B- 11
C- 14
D- 4
Ofc 1
43
Revised Plan
A- 13
B- 8
C- 12
D- 6
Ofc 0
M
SITE AREA:
LOT ONE: 30.438 S.F. ( .698 ACRES 1
LOT TWO: 192.192 S.F. (4.412 ACRES)
TOTAL AREA: 222.630 S.F. (5.110 ACRES)
TOWNHOME MIX:
UNIT A: 13 + 6 (PHASE TWO)
UNIT B: I 1
UNIT C• 14
A A A A .A A
B
N
SITE PLAN
4110 2S so ioo
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
OAKS
►��
�� --
TOTAL: 2 (PHASE ONE)
LINCOLN �-``
B _
TOTAL: 48 (,PHASE TWO)
OFFICE
B 4
CENTER
* ALTERNATE: B UNITS
SUBSTITUTED FOR C UNITS
C
J�
B "
VARIANCES REQUIRED:
C
• VARIANCE REQ'D. FOR A
C
B _
UNIT AT MECORNER
IF SIX UNITS ARE USED
C
B _
FOR FUTURE TOWNHOUSES
\y�_I
(SHOWN AS DOTTED)
•
t� C �
B
NORTH UNIT B ADJACENT
,- t
c
TO LOT ONE PROPERTY
C
� B
`p
B
v` C
B
C
D
VISITOR PARKING
c
^
`o
D ��
C
^. SETBACK LINE
•,�
��
*
D C
C
-" A A
AAA
VISITOR PARKING
VISITOR PARKING
-- AA
- A
-�
A A
N
SITE PLAN
4110 2S so ioo
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
0
c
"ilwo
24' -6"
PATIO
DINING RM LIVING RM.
10' -10" X 90. 12' -8" X 14' -0"
ALCOVE
UNDERSTAIRS
KITCHEN
1
10'-6 X 10'-0
.
...
D•
10'-6
FOYER
ENTRY
5-3" X 4
GARAGE
18'-4" X 21' -6"
i�
19'-4"
do
GROUND LEVEL NET AREA: 645 S.F.
GARAGE NET AREA : 394 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA :1126 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
e M91V97
24' -6"
DEN BEDROOM
10' -6" X 13' -5" 10' -2" X 13' -10"
i i I�j j
j D N
V
MASTER BEDROOM
16' -4" X 11' -0"
18' -2"
44
2ND LEVEL NET AREA: 843 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 905 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOIMIES
11197
25'-4"
12' -0"
�T -
4' -0"
LAUNDRY
I F -10" X 10' -6"
MECH. 4
11' -8" X 6' -6"
' , I
MUD
ROOM
i
GARAGE UP!
17'-4" X 21' -6" - - -
------------------------
STORAGE
UNDER STAIR
GROUND LEVEL NET AREA: 260 S.F.
GARAGE NET AREA: 373 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 816 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
1 T
N
N
25. -4„
IN
DECK
DINING
10' -0" X 13' -6"
i
LIVING ROOM
14'4" X 18' -0"
i
KITCHEN
^ 12' -5" x 10' -0" .�
FOYER
ROOF
'I
1 ST LEVEL NET AREA: 688 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 737 S.F.
. -5"
�Ot
V1'
N11
y
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
rm O 11A7
25, -4.,
i
M. BEDROOM BEDROOM
' 12' -0" X 13' -6" 10° X 10°
i
HALL
BATH MBATH
2ND LEVEL NET AREA: 582 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 627 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
�qm 0 11197
24'-4"
-� - --- - - - - -- - - - - --
I
I
i
i
i
I + I
FUTURE BM
FUTURE DEN
12' -2" X 11' -7"
14'4" X 18' -0"
I
I'm
-BATH
l i1
W
:1 --
7
UT LrlY ROOM D 771
.I
D U
.I
UNEXCAVATED
WALKOUT LEVEL NET AREA: 537 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 667 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
11/97
25'-4"
DECK i
DR41NG
i
LIVING ROOM
10'-0" X 13' -4"
14'4" X 19'-4"
it
F-77
L�
f C.; KITCHEN
f
12' -10" x 10'-4"
!TH
ty
V1 --- '-------'- p
Li
D �J
GARAGE
I
180 X 21' -6"
I
18' -8" 6' -7"
GROUND LEVEL NET AREA: 645 S.F.
GARAGE NET AREA: 384 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 1102 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TO WNHOMES
25'-4"
IC;
M. BEDROOM BEDROOM
12' -0" X 12' -2" �� Hr X 100
ao i
C4
L\ �
CLOSET TTH ATH L- i
D U
IT61610
2ND LEVEL NET AREA: 608 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 659 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
mmo,tN,
IT
32'-g"
BEDROOM
11OX14'-6"
DINING LIVING ROOM
80X12'-O" 12' -9X 16' -0"
GARAGE
18'-4"X21'-6"
11197
191-01,
NET AREA:
1078 S.F.
NET GARAGE AREA:
394 S.F.
TOTAL GROSS AREA:
1552 S.F.
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
11197
CORRESPONDENCE
ROBIN B. NELSON
5180 MALIBU DRIVE
EDINA, MN 55436
JANUARY 26, 1998
CITY CLERK
CITY OF EDINA, MN
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
DEAR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I AM RESPONDING AS A PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN 500 FEET TO THE
PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT, (CASE FILE Z -98 -1 & S- 98 -1), BY
APPLICANT NAMRON COMPANY LLC. MY PROPERTY IS LOCATED
IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
I HAVE TWO CONCERNS:
1. GIVEN THE ACERAGE AVAILABLE, THE NUMBER OF UNITS (42) WOULD MAKE
AN VERY DENSE DEVELOPMENT.
2. GIVEN THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LAND AND THE HEIGHT OF THE
TOWNHOUSES, THERE WOULD BE A LACK OF VISUAL PRIVACY FOR BOTH
THE TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTS AS WELL AS THE MALIBU DRIVE RESIDENTS.
WOULD THE COUNCIL CONSIDER LOWERING THE DENSITY SOMEWHAT AND
REQUESTING A LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND ITS
MALIBU DRIVE NEIGHBORS?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
YOURS TRULY,
ROBIN B. NELSON
CC: ROBERT L. CROSBY
)OU 2 C�,, If-Fv
F
��-
`v V�(J , �Vv
77)
c:1
z7
74
CORRINE L. and FREDERICK E. DRILL, M.D.
50 go M eXi b" b-r; Ile
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55436
HOME OFFICE
CORI FRITZ
(612) Q9� (612) 927 -4525
Ea Yj .1 C, C Ovtv)G;) -
�:,s (e.I� w 0� one- 'rrA (mt)O.VJ +Dw-n pUAQtJ-' S."AInc &qlri.
h serQn z, eo -n W In s 2 b o >t I 44ri deg w p rrwn � as P'wrVS4
�r.1 \ 1q- CAI z)-ed I v. 41u Qt¢ e bi f)v 4d�
-� &-rn 67 q-�z -" vvy-) /h vw s on z v" S y") p Le cP ) aanal .
a. /)),, z--Q-0 'ama 1( *nZ �--v- w I I I n o% V 4 S w W)-
Pzi h,o� spzca 0v lzb�e -, mst2v, 01 ,n Yvrl
c I vn e y } cep i2 i Y7 L �»^,�v m, s..e a e c.2s s -e-ms�em l
ex s �, t rr) �.t nc� SeV�1t yl 9rnP11S e-h YI'l�1, �w.
4. kr\e r� &eCr vt 0 h2 L.t -�o Sal, 1' (P�r�+ iS G'l
-�-o �vw (�vse I of s e r�
ese '�- 0 v�3-n ht.es 2nd. rte c,es s aj rn�c.It �r►� �� ad -
�;,,,.r,� -S e�,� e,c� 5� , ►-.' '� Yrc s . 2',m A zulj 'V,a.t.c -I-o
by)
YLQ ► g'�r b � S .
'NA 1/LF 2 �2W)YYM� Ir!'1
0 � �,e ,,.s t . k 2
�n L n 1 P r
dies ,nod SeeYrt �,nll�,�1 �o1�n� s v`sxz) A\% clU�s
YnwW" b-Q-r vLrr �4.e -Ynas
o,n. 6hOn6j b
C�1, n,
� | �
�
n�
{ . �
. . `
! ! |
c�
2-(�� |
\
Fri
tz-
pro
Mcarh
� | �
�
n�
{ . �
. . `
! ! |
c�
2-(�� |
\
Pr
� ���ppm»��p��.
_.
\-.~---._.
_
-
_
-
--- - -
/~
p~
*�
�
It. k a
/
''/ '
pp
F
OD
Icy W
'01 Aft
Pr
� ���ppm»��p��.
_.
\-.~---._.
_
-
_
-
--- - -
/~
p~
*�
�
It. k a
/
''/ '
ti.\CIC�IPNUM _.
limml
"� .g caMPI�GT
T pm,^c4 Pl=+-
-y
=CIA Jc�t�IFt✓}' --
Gi�SWDOD
8.4
s.
•�jiya
7LG1'fNY
i¢ 1'�OFDPi-
T.
F`
—�
- - - - -�
- - - --
r - -,
rr
I
r-
,
'
I I
..o.
I I
�
I I
1 I
v,
•ai.
ly rm,)K*ff
/
:JDIA
= flY1?�P_
e
JE�Fp
ITL puILDiNl� CGIyFfE�LfSCta1� .oN_�cTEPa/�5t°1 - --
—
ti.\CIC�IPNUM _.
limml
"� .g caMPI�GT
T pm,^c4 Pl=+-
-y
=CIA Jc�t�IFt✓}' --
R MIMI _ `�
.,�: .
. ,,;��� - _ -- :- _ Ilia _ __�_- ._ -- �• _ ; ., -,.��� - ���
sit
JL
U
�'.:, �!
---------- -
PAI
FIM 015
METALCRIVOCOMMME
GEOTEXTILEFAMIC
FABRIO ANCHCRAAIE TRENCH
TRENCH VATN SOL
OF
NOTES:
1. GISE: TOP OF GARA93E SLAB AT FFAW OF
I LFE LOWEST FROSHIED FLOOR ELEVATKK
& GFE . GIOUIND FLOOR ELEVATION
4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT OUTSIDE HEAR CS' LMM ARE FROSHED
ram ATTACH FAB= TOIRM MESH AND
GFIADE.
L THE STFIEET SMALL BE POSTED FOR 10 IMPH
GUPF0RrPClMWlTHRPMQRWNVTM
a EXWM TOPOGPAPeWAL DFORMAMM FROM EGAN FIELD & NOWAK
Slit Fence
w–
7. MA71EFFY EINGINGEERM M RIECOMMEIM SOL
INVESrARTIONS BE PEFIFOFVMED ON UM
& MAnM eMAMM NM FECOMMOMS THAT ALL SLOPES SMALL
SE A UkV W AM 5;1.
so 0 so SO b
Horiz. Scale I VY
WARNING =110" Pmunume t 7 � �s � = c 0
"LLQ"�==
==V AM MAW OE
Lm O owi
1.800402-1160
wf "a oomvmmwwm� %TU=
#A&V W" M40 ff
— -- Tm
-REOUIRED MY LAW
Im
MOm 7wN Cr SUCK
Lom
.. ..............
Sam
L I WCOLN
C" DEMON
PARIGN
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
A
........... I
..........
A 611 roll V —MYU FENCE
0
"m
�A
W.6ma
Ixe
FRIEZE 80.
CNN
FRONT ELEVA
SCAM
#4 AS -
........ ...........................................................................................................................................
.................................. .
..................................
REAR ELEVATION BLDG #4 AS - A11
SCALE,
—rKofmwss
-LEVEL TWO
b
LEVEL ONE
0
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
/-3-- SIDE ELEVATION OF A-6 & A -11 BLDG #4
Ncl/SCALE'. WW-W
a
..........................
....... .. 111 .....
FRONT ELEVATION OF UNITS C-1 THROUGH C-6
SCALE: W.V-V
.......................................
r2— REAR ELE
�AMJ
SCALE: is-ow
I XSTRIM
fryp)
ixe
FRIEZE BD.
cryp.)
BOTTOM
OFTRUSS
MFG.STD.
CORNER TRIM
TYP. ALL ID
CORNERS
PORCH ROOF
BRICK
12
FIN. GRADE
SEE FOUN-
PLANS FOR FOOTING
............... I ----------------------- -------------------------------
........................................................................... - . 1 ELEVATIONS
OAKS LINCOLN TOdVNHOMES
91,1 RGIA I ILI I i 1�:905§
BALCONY ROOF
I X 3 TRIM
AT PORCH
cryp)
OPEN AT END
OF ROOF
Ixe
FRIEZE 80.
(TYP-)
RAILING
MFG,STD
CORNER �Rlm
TWLRMOONC•
TYP. ALL
BLOCK
OORNEM
0 X 6 TREATED POST
POST FOOTING
VINYL BIDING
SEE FOUNDATION
PLAN FOR FOOTING p
ELEVATIONS
FIN. GRADE
SEE FOUN-
PLANS FOR FOOTING
............... I ----------------------- -------------------------------
........................................................................... - . 1 ELEVATIONS
OAKS LINCOLN TOdVNHOMES
91,1 RGIA I ILI I i 1�:905§
VINYLSIDING
1X8
FRIEZE BD.
(TYR)
MFG.STD.
CORNER TRIM
TYP. ALL
C0RNERS
1xS
FRIEZE BD.
(TYP-)
FOR STAIRS IN
FOREGROUND
FRONT ELEVATION OF UNITS B -1 THROUGH B-4
FOR STAIRS IN
FOREGROUND
i
:-•---------•------------------------------------•---------------------------
\ FRONT ELEVATION OF UNITS B -1 THROUGH B-4
12
BF-
1XB FRIEZE BD.
MFG ' STD.
CORNER TRIM
TYP. ALL
CORNERS
VINYL
SIDING
OPEN AT ENDS
OF PORCH OVERHANGS
TYPICAL
TEXT. C.BLY
FRONT ELEVATION OF UNITS B -1 THROUGH B-4
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
FRONT ELEVATION OF UNITS 0-1 THROUGH D-6
UJ SCALE: W-V-V -
REAR ELEVATION OF UNITS D-1 THROUGH D-6-
SCALE: Ur.I Q
SCREENED PORCHES (TYP.)
1z
TYP. SIDE ELEVATION OF UNITS D -1 THROUGH D-6
OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES
1x3TRIM
(TYP)
1x FASCIA
1X8
FRIEZE SD.
(TYP.)
MFO.STD.
CORNER TRIM
TYP. ALL
DORMERS
BRICK WAINSCOT WITH
PRECAST STONE CAP
ONT. RIDGE VENT - -
INYL SIDING
DOFING
RIEZE BOARD
RICK
EXTURED CONC. BLOCK
1 x 3 TAM
(Typ)
ixe
FRIEZE 80.
(TYP.)
MFG.STD.
CORNERTRM
TYP. ALL
CORNERS
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 18 May, 1998
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Two Dump Truck Cabs & Chassis
Company
Boyer Trucks, Inc. (State of Minnesota Contract #2007956)
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Boyer Trucks, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM III.A.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 114,203.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
$ 114,203.00
This purchase is for one single axle and one tandem axle dump truck cab and chassis. This is part of
the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing program. These vehicles are paid from the 1999 budget
but must be pre- ordered given production schedules by the manufacturer. This purchase is funded from
the equipment replacement schedule. These units replace 1985 Unit Nos. 25 -244 and 25 -345. -
�'w�,�✓ Public Works - Streets
Sign ure Department
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not within budget deKn Wallin, Fin nce Director
Kenneth Rosl nd, City Manager
A
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: William Bernhjelm, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: May 14, 1998
ITEM DESCRIPTION: IBM AS400 Computer
Company
1. Total Solutions Group (TSG)
2. IBM
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Total Solutions Group (TSG)
AGENDA ITEM 313.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 97,697.46 (w /tax)
2. $107,288.27 (w /tax)
3.$
4.$
5.$
$97,697.46
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is for the replacement of the police department's main computer for our dispatch records and
records management programs. The bid amount is for the computer, software upgrades, installation,
data conversion and training. Our current computer was purchased in 1991, with a life expectancy of
five years. Our current computer does not have the capacity for required vendor software upgrades
and required enhancements to the operating systems. This upgrade will give us the capacity to
implement our mobil data plan and computerized reporting. The life expectancy of the new specified
computer is eight years. This purchase was budgeted through the equipment replacement account.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Police
Department
not within budget Jo allin, Finance rector
Kenneth Rosland, Ci Manager
M
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: May 18, 1998
Subject: Attached Traffic Safety
Minutes and 1997 Average
Daily Traffic Map
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # IV. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Review and approve Traffic Safety Minutes /Review traffic map.
Info /Background:
Attached is the monthly Traffic Safety Minutes for Council review as prepared by Vince
Bongaarts, Traffic Safety Coordinator.
Also attached is the traffic map for 1997. It depicts the average daily traffic for state
highways, county roads and city state aid streets (major collectors and arterials).
The purpose of attaching the map for review is to provide information upon which to use
when evaluating traffic safety requests. The staff often receives traffic safety requests
when volumes exceed 500 vehicles per day on City streets. When this request is
received, it is evaluated with the use of Council approved Traffic Safety policies.
Excluding the state highways and county roads, the map indicates the traffic volumes
on City designated state aid streets that serve as collector or arterial streets in Edina
(40 miles).
Report/Recommendation
Agenda Item N.A.
Page Two
Occasionally, other streets reach traffic volume levels that would place the street in the
minor collector street category. These are usually neighborhood collector streets, such
as West Shore Drive, Cornelia Drive, and W. 72 "d Street from Cornelia to France. The
issue often arises as to the role of the minor collector street as compared to the City
state aid streets (major collector and arterials) to the strictly local residential street.
Residents often view these streets as local residential streets which these streets
cannot functionally be. This causes rise to the issue of pedestrian safety on those
streets.
The current City policy on state aid streets is to add sidewalk on at least one side with a
street reconstruction project or as a stand alone project if requested by residents on the
state aid street system. These projects are funded by state aid funds.
The current City policy on sidewalks for local streets and minor collectors (non -state
aid) is to require a petition and special assessment to abutting property owners. As
such, staff is reviewing guidelines for future policy on sidewalk installation.
Staff understands that "Stop" signs and other devices do not materially change how a
street will operate given its position in the City hierarchy of street function.
Finally, the purpose to providing this data again is to provide traffic information and to
hopefully recognize that some streets operate functionally different than strictly local
residential and thus become candidates for pedestrian sidewalks when volumes reach
uncomfortable levels.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
TUESDAY, MAY 5, 1998
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 5, 1998. Staff present
included the Assistant City Manager, Police Chief, City Engineer, Assistant City
Engineer, the Traffic Safety Coordinator and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist.
From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
May 18, 1998, Council Agenda.
Requests on which the staff recommends approval.
1. The staff received a request accompanied by a petition for all -way "Stop" signs at
Dunberry Lane and West Shore Drive and also Upper Terrace and West Shore
Drive. Shortly after receiving the above request another resident of the same
area requested to include Laguna Drive and West Shore Drive also for all -way
"Stop" signs.
The requesters stated problems of speed, etc., on West Shore Drive that
endanger children and pedestrians. These problems are addressed in a letter
attached to this report. The letter refers to the approval of "Stop" signs at W.
68`h Street and Cornelia Drive by the Council on 1/20/98.
The Dunberry Lane/West Shore Drive intersection is a 4 -way intersection with
"Stop" signs in place for westbound and eastbound Dunberry Lane. This
intersection is just north of the W. 701h Street/West Shore Drive intersection
which has "Stop" signs in place for northbound and southbound West Shore
Drive.
Upper Terrace and Laguna Drive are both 'T' type intersections with no "Stop"
signs.
There are two more intersections between W. 66`h Street and W. 70`h Street on
West Shore Drive, Wilford Way and Balfanz Road. These are both 'T' type
intersections with no "Stop" signs.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 2
West Shore Drive between W. 66th Street and W. 701h Street is a natural conduit
for carrying traffic to the residential areas east and west of West Shore Drive.
The only intersection of the five with any recorded accident history is Dunberry
Lane/West Shore Drive. That accident occurred on 6/26/97 at 4:38 PM. It
involved no injuries. A vehicle westbound on Dunberry Lane, that had a "Stop"
sign, failed to yield to a vehicle northbound on West Shore Drive.
A traffic counter and speed analyzer were installed both in the 6700 block and
the 6800 block of West Shore Drive for the period of one week:
The 6700 block of West Shore Drive had an average daily Monday thru
Friday traffic count of 758 vehicles. The average daily 85 percentile speed
was 33 MPH. There was an average of 9 vehicles per day exceeding 40
MPH.
• The 6800 block of West Shore Drive had an average Monday thru Friday
daily traffic count of 1037 vehicles. The average daily 85 percentile speed
was 34 MPH, with an average of 13 vehicles per day exceeding 40 MPH.
Two separate rush hour observations 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM were done at each of
the three intersections:
• West Shore Drive /Dunberry Lane intersections that have "Stop" signs already
for eastbound and westbound Dunberry Lane has good sight lines. There
was no congestion observed. Traffic from Dunberry Lane had no problems
exiting to West Shore Drive and had little or no wait at "Stop" signs. There
were very few pedestrians or bike riders during this time. There was an
average of 60 vehicles using Dunberry Lane during rush hour observations.
• West Shore Drive /Upper Terrace intersection is a 'T' type intersection with
Upper Terrace to the west side of West Shore Drive. There was no
congestion or waiting at this intersection. The majority of vehicles on Upper
Terrace came to a stop prior to entering West Shore Drive. Sight lines were
adequate. Some pedestrians and bike travel was present. There was an
average of 35 vehicles using Upper Terrace during the rush hour observation.
• West Shore Drive /Laguna Drive intersection is a 'T' type intersection with
Laguna Drive to the east of West Shore Drive. This intersection had the least
amount of traffic of the three intersections. No problems of any type occurred
during these observations. There was an average of 20 vehicles using
Laguna Drive during rush hour observations.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 3
The staff discussed the situation and also the reference to Cornelia Drive and
the new 3 -way (all -way) "Stop" sign at W. 68th Street/Cornelia Drive. A traffic
count/speed analyzer was placed at 6908 Cornelia Drive the week after the
surveys on West Shore Drive for comparison. The location of counter /analyzer
was approximately one block south of the W. 68th Street intersection. The survey
was one week long. The average Monday thru Friday daily traffic was 1023
vehicles. Prior to "Stop" sign placement the average was approximately 1000
vehicles. The average 85 percentile speed for southbound traffic coming
from the "Stop" sign at W. 681h Street one block away was 35 MPH. Prior to
the "Stop" sign being installed it was 32 MPH.
There was a daily average of 19 vehicles exceeding 40 MPH while southbound
on Cornelia Drive from W. 68`h Street. The traffic northbound on Cornelia Drive
that have no stop from W. 70th Street had an 85 percentile speed of 35 MPH also
but fewer cars on an average exceeding 40 MPH (15 at 40 MPH).
The staff, as they did with the Cornelia Drive situation, feel that sidewalks would
best serve the purpose as a solution to pedestrian safety, etc.
The staff had a hard time again reaching some form of consensus regarding this
situation. Without consensus it was decided to recommend the "Stop" signs on
West Shore Drive at Upper Terrace on the same basis and justification they were
recommended for W. 68th Street and Cornelia Drive. The rational being that the
signs would serve as a traffic travel time delay. This may encourage through or
non -local residential traffic would stay on the main collectors and stay off the
local residential street because they didn't want the obstruction or hindrance of a
"Stop" sign.
There are no warrants or criteria per the City Residential Stop Sign Policy
justifying "Stop" signs on West Shore Drive`at Dunberry Lane or at Laguna Drive
and West Shore Drive.
Without consensus, the staff recommends all way 3 -way "Stop" signs at West
Shore Drive and Upper Terrace. With consensus the staff recommends denial
of "Stop" signs at Laguna Drive and West Shore and also on West Shore Drive
at Dunberry Lane.
2. Reference the Maple Road sidewalk/traffic issue.
The staff reviewed the memorandum from SRF Consulting Group regarding the
Maple Road neighborhood traffic issue. A copy is attached to this report.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 4
The staff in discussion, felt that regarding speed limit reduction, there isn't a
whole lot that can be done to lower the present 85 percentile of 29 MPH.
SRF is correct in stating that the City cannot enforce a local traffic only
restriction, on a public road.
Regarding "Stop" signs, there are no warrants justifying "Stop" signs. W. 49'
Street and Maple Road is a 'T' type intersection requiring vehicles on W. 49th
Street to yield to Maple Road traffic.
Regarding "No Left Turns" from W. 501h Street, this would only create a
significant inconvenience for the residents who comprise the greater part of the
left turn traffic.
And finally, on the issue of sidewalks: When you have a street like Maple Road
with no sidewalks and an average daily traffic flow of 700+ vehicles, a daily
average of 11 -14 vehicle trips per day from each residence, and a fair amount of
pedestrian traffic, the only solution to enhance the pedestrians' safety is
sidewalks which give them their own space and free them from competing with
the vehicles.
The staff is continuing to work on improving the traffic flow through the W. 50th
Street and France Avenue intersection in a cooperative effort with the City of
Minneapolis. This should include the synchronization of traffic lights at the
intersections of W. 501h Street/Halifax and W. 501h Street/France Avenue. It
should also include taking a serious look at adding parking restrictions during
rush hours along France Avenue on both the Edina and Minneapolis sides. By
improving the traffic flow through the 50th /France area we can possibly lessen
some of the cut through traffic in the surrounding neighborhoods to include
Maple Road.
Staff will work with the City of Minneapolis to improve traffic flow through W. 50th
Street/Halifax and W. 501h Street/France Avenue.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
Request for "Stop" signs somewhere on W. 53`d Street between Wooddale and
Brookview Avenue. Requester states there are no "Stop" signs on W. 53' Street
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 5
in this three block stretch and because of the growing number of small children,
etc., there probably should be.
The accident history for this area shows only one accident occurring on 5/23/97
at W. 53`d Street and Brookview Avenue where one vehicle cut the corner too
short striking another vehicle in process. No injuries reported.
Traffic counter /speed analyzer was used on W. 53`d Street from 4/21/98
(Tuesday) to 4/27/98 (Monday). The average daily traffic was 150 vehicles. The
average daily 85 percentile speed was 26.4 MPH. Highest speed recorded was
one at 38 MPH.
Staff recommends denial for the lack of warrants.
2. A request for "Stop" signs on Ewing Avenue for both northbound and
southbound traffic at intersections with W. 61 sc Street, Chowen Curve, and /or W.
62 "d Street. The requester felt that some individuals were driving on Ewing
Avenue at high rates of speed creating unsafe conditions and wanted the "Stop"
signs to slow them down.
There is no accident history for any of the three intersections.
The traffic counter /speed analyzer was installed on Ewing Avenue from 4/29/98
(Monday) to 4/27/98 (Sunday). The average daily vehicle count for Ewing
Avenue Monday thru Friday was 290 vehicles.
The average daily 85 percentile speed was 30.1 MPH. Highest speed recorded
during this survey was 39 MPH four different times.
Staff recommends denial due to lack of warrants.
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
A draft memorandum was received form the SRF Consulting Group regarding
the Parkwood Knolls south neighborhood traffic issues.
The report was sent back to SRF for additional travel time review.
This matter will be continued to June, 1998.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 6
2. It was brought to the attention of the Traffic Safety Coordinator that several
residents on Edgebrook Place were using the one -way street the wrong way on
numerous occasions.
On 11/17/97 the City Council changed the direction of Edgebrook Place at the
request of the residents.
The requester stated that some of those committing the violations were the same
residents who requested the change. The requester felt something should be
done to correct this situation.
A letter was drafted addressing this issue and sent to the residents of Edgebrook
Place. A copy of that letter is attached to this report.
3. Request to do something about speed in the alley between Grimes Avenue and
Wooddale Avenue. This. alley is located just north of Sunnyside Avenue.
Requester said that some of the vehicles using the alley were driving far in
excess of the posted 10 MPH speed limit to a point of recklessness, creating a
dangerous situation for any children or pedestrians that might venture out into
the alley.
A letter was drafted to promote safety and cooperation in use of the alley and
sent to all the adjacent residents. A copy of that letter is attached to this report.
4. Request for 4 -way all way "Stop" signs at the intersection of W. 72nd Street and
Cornelia Drive.
This also is a school crossing for Cornelia School and the requester feels that
the heavy traffic at this intersection creates a potential problem for the children
and other pedestrians.
The intersection presently is a two -way "Stop" for northbound and southbound
Cornelia Drive. Currently, W. 72 "d Street is stopped at Oaklawn just west of
Cornelia Drive.
This intersection has a school patrol stationed there for beginning and ending
school hours.
The intersection carries a fairly substantial amount of cut through traffic.
The staff decided to continue this for some more study as there may be warrants
to justify a 4 -way "Stop ".
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 7
6
0
At their regular meeting, on July 14, 1997, the Edina School Board directed the
school administration "to pursue with the City an investigation of traffic patterns
on the City streets surrounding our schools and bring recommendations to the
Board of Education by January, 1998, what will promote the increased safety of
the students who walk to school in our district ".
On April 7, 1998, the staff met with Jay Williamson from the Edina School
District. This was the first time the staff became aware of the School Board's
proposal. Apparently there have been some staff changes at the School District
in the last year and the proposal got temporarily misplaced.
The staff has been addressing individual concerns regarding traffic matters on
streets surrounding the schools on an on going basis for many years.
In the last few years the schools have acquired some traffic problems that are
directly related to their school sites. There are more parents driving their
children to and from school rather than using the bus system. This includes
parents who don't want their children walking to school, (those within the 7/10
mile walking area) and those who leave their kids at the daycare facilities at the
schools.
The staff after some discussion, felt that it would be best to continue working with
school staff and PTA's on safe walking routes to and from schools. Regarding
school on sites, this is best left to the school administrators along with their
various committees. If the committees, principals, etc., have recommendations
that affect City streets, etc., they should be forwarded to Jay Williamson of the
School District who in turn would present them to the staff.
The staff would continue to provide studies of potential problem areas and assist
in the gathering of information to assist in the correction or improvement of any
traffic problems on the City streets. The City is currently updating the City
sidewalk system map as part of the City Comprehensive Plan update required by
Metropolitan Council.
A copy of the School Board's proposal is attached.
A request for "No Right Turn" during school starting and ending times, for traffic
eastbound on Grove Street turning southbound on Stuart Avenue.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 5, 1998
Page 8
The requester feels that the traffic making right turns on to Stuart Avenue from
eastbound Grove Street are inattentive of the children walking to Countryside
School and subsequently creating a dangerous situation.
There are no sidewalks or school patrols at this intersection. The traffic using
Stuart Avenue at these times are primarily parents delivering or picking up their
children at school and the school buses.
Observations have shown that many of these parents make questionable to no
stop at the "Stop" sign posted for eastbound Grove traffic.
There appears to be a move by the School District to consolidate the various
issues and complaints regarding student safety and look for solutions to solve
these problems.
The staff felt that this was one of those issues and the requester should direct
her request to the principal of Countryside School or the committee working on
those problems.
A big apart of the problem is the increased traffic created by parents driving their
children to and from school and subsequently commingling and competing with
school buses for space. The children that are walking, without sidewalks and
other protections, could become exposed to danger from this competing traffic.
March 27, 1998
Mr. Vince Bongaarts
Traffic Safety Coordinator
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50'h Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Vince:
Enclosed please find a signed petition from West Shore Drive residents, neighbors whose
properties border on West Shore Drive, and a family close to West Shore on Dunberry Lane with
young children who also wanted to sign. We are at this time directing the City Council to initiate
the installation of the stop signs specified. We are confident these signs will help to decrease the
excessive speed at which vehicles travel between 66`h Street and 700' Street on West Shore Drive.
The situation is extremely dangerous to the many pedestrians that use West Shore Drive as a
walkway, as well as those motorists travelling through the intersections specified in the petition.
have personally helped police officers sweep glass out of the street after a crash at the
Dunberry/West Shore intersection.
West Shore Drive is the last open path left between 66`h Street and 70`h Street between the borders
of Highway 100 and France Avenue without any stop signs or method of slowing traffic. We feel
the situation will only escalate as Cornelia now has succeeded in obtaining a three -way stop sign
system to alleviate their traffic concerns - -more motorists will now opt for "the path of least
resistance." We feel that two intersections require stop signs: Dunberry Lane crosses West Shore
Drive at the bottom of a hill. Motorists typically increase speed as they travel down this hill which
makes the intersection at the bottom tricky for Dunberry motorists and even worse for those trying
to hurry across on foot. Also, in presenting these concerns to neighbors who are further north on
West Shore Drive, they feel their area is dangerous as well, as motorists increase speed to make it
up over the rise at Upper Terrace. All agree that it would be most effective to have this West
Shore "mid- point" stop sign to attempt to control the speeding and negligent drivers before they
travel the entire length of West Shore from 66`h Street to Dunberry. Today we view West Shore
Drive as a thoroughfare for motorists - -not a safe residential street for our children and pedestrians
to enjoy.
It has been an extremely interesting experience going door to door for the past four weekends,
meeting my neighbors, being invited into their homes and listening to so many "near- miss"
stories. I have been told that during the summer months, frustrated West Shore residents shout at
motorists to slow down, and that one parent actually stood in the road to stop a car driving
excessively fast. People are obviously approaching desperate measures with their frustrations at
the situation. Another resident told me her understanding was that there had to be a fatality before
stop signs would be installed! Parents are greatly concerned for the many, many young children
that now reside in our neighborhood. I had expected that possibly the households closest to the
intersections we are requesting stop signs for might be hesitant to have a sign installed directly in
their yards. EACH HOUSE was absolutely supportive of this effort. Houses near the Laguna
intersection said they wished the petition would request the stop signs for their immediate
intersection! This would also be a logical intersection for a stop sign system as it is as the foot of
two hills and is also mid - point. The petition was worded, obviously, prior to speaking to each of
the persons who have signed it. I believe that there would be a great deal of support for stop signs
at Laguna also, but at this time we can only present what we have signed support for.
I heard that my neighbors have brought their concerns to City Hall before and met resistance to
their requests for stop signs. We no longer have a choice. Action needs to be taken NOW to
proactively make our neighborhood safer. Please help us prevent a tragedy. Of the doors I have
knocked on: 28 households have said YES -- moreover, 40 individuals wanted their names on
this petition; 1 household abstained: 2 households said no; 2 households were gone for the winter;
and there were 8 households that nobody was home to answer the door or speak with. I have
several offers of people who will come to speak, if necessary, to further support this cause. It
seems as if people had almost given up, but are again hopeful that we will receive help from the
city on this critical cause.
We look forward to working with you, Vince, in making our West Shore Drive area a safer
neighborhood for our families. We greatly appreciate any assistance you can give us now how to
succeed in our goal. Please feel free to contact meat work (376 -3783) or home (920 -0875) with
any questions or concerns.
The residents of West Shore Drive and the surrounding streets await your approval.
Sincerely,
Jane Sundin
4700 Dunberry Lane
enc: Petition from West Shore Drive Residents
PETITION FOR WEST SHORE DRIVE RESIDENTS
The West Shore Drive residents and those persons whose property border on
West Shore Drive (Edina, Minnesota), as indicated by our signatures below,
hereby petition the Edina City Council, to authorize the installation of
1) a three -way stop sign system at the intersection of West Shore Drive
and Upper Terrace, and
2) an additional two stop signs to create a four -way stop sign system
at the intersection of West Shore Drive and Dunberry Lane.
We are concerned that the continued violation of the legal speed limit of
30 mph may likely result in injury or death to one of our neighbors. It is not
uncommon to have vehicles driving on West Shore Drive in speeds
significantly in excess of the legal speed limit, which we feel is dangerous in a
residential neighborhood, in addition to being illegal.
We hereby direct the Edina City Council to initiate approval and installation
of the aforementioned stop signs.
Name „ Address Home Phone Date
�Zgo Doti <4�z2 y gL� _��75
A 1 `JYli��l
n0
_y7o9
DLL ✓ I
Y70o 4j!, � &C
6 g�� �WZt'&
--------- - - - - --
ZYo 4= &A
6401 L ,_JmA,
2 -0 1 a-4 4--
<doCV
y2- r_j�� 6
%Z6 -_7/FZ
o61_ s8 ��
rzZIU213
Q� 344a
4el'o
Zl?CrlyF
z�ZY /yY
21�v�
3-7<ig
2
tb�L
'V
7A V
'7
2-
�.�� -may
Date
YOF,
T 7
-4y" rP
3-1-le.
3-y
4
2-7-Y�
ore dr 9� (v - ?fo K
Ll
&got. U,,A s f&eb q.-*-ggsq
qs�,
:2 liql
6716�, a avT A
?Z9 - 07,�
����,�- `�.,��
L r��" �`. flew () ,
(v6,3 2- z,-,,,, -Fk cl.e- 0/-
— 2P-m & kJ
2
tb�L
'V
7A V
'7
2-
�.�� -may
Date
YOF,
T 7
-4y" rP
3-1-le.
3-y
4
2-7-Y�
ore dr 9� (v - ?fo K
&got. U,,A s f&eb q.-*-ggsq
qs�,
:2 liql
6716�, a avT A
?Z9 - 07,�
3
(v6,3 2- z,-,,,, -Fk cl.e- 0/-
— 2P-m & kJ
311,Y15�p
�� �� W-
j z -7 -5.5
cIZ6 -77/7
Name Address Home Phone Date
A
I Z ) -2 -y;
3 /a-0/ 3
CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Transportation ■ Civil ■ Structural • Environmental ■ Planning ■ Traffic ■ Landscape Architecture • Parking
SRF No. 0983003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Traffic Safety Committee, City of Edina
FROM: Dennis R. Eyler, P.E., Principal
Jeff Bednar, Senior Traffic Engineer Specialist
DATE: April 16, 1998
SUBJECT: MAPLE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ISSUES
As the traffic safety committee has requested we have completed a review of the subject
Maple Road neighborhood traffic issues and other available information related to these
issues including the AD HOC Maple Road Study Committee Survey of the residents.
Based on this review the following comments and recommendations are offered for your
consideration:
• Based on traffic counts completed by the City in February 1997 it is estimated that the
average daily traffic volume on Maple Road north of 50`h Street is 1,000 vehicles per
day. According to the Metropolitan Council's Functional Classification System for
Streets and Highways, 1,000 vehicles per day is the upper limit for local streets.
Beyond 1,000 vehicles per day the street would fall into the collector street
classification. Recent information related to daily traffic volumes on local residential
streets indicates that neighborhood residents begin to feel uncomfortable when daily
traffic volumes on their street reach 500 vehicles per day or more.
• In an effort to identify the amount of "through" traffic using Maple Road, the City
completed a sample license plate survey on Maple Road north of 50th Street during
both the morning and afternoon peak periods in late January and early February 1998.
From this data there appears to be significantly more "through" traffic during the
afternoon peak periods. This is typical of "through" traffic in other neighborhoods
that have been studied throughout the City. This "through" traffic is most likely
"cutting" through the Maple Road neighborhood in order to avoid the higher level of
congestion and delay in the France Avenue and West 50' Street area that occurs
during the afternoon peak periods.
One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55447 -4443
Telephone (612) 475 -0010 ■ Fax (612) 475 -2429 ■ http: / /www.srfconsulting.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Traffic Safety Committee - 2 - April 16, 1998
• Based on this sample license plate survey it is estimated that there could be between
20 to 35 percent "through" traffic within the total traffic volume present on Maple
Road. Assuming the City was able to take effective action to eliminate all of this
"through" traffic, there would continue to be as much as 650 to. 800 vehicle trips per
day on Maple Road. This would also be a daily traffic volume that the neighborhood
residents could be uncomfortable with.
• The travel shed that Maple Road serves (the area south of Sunnyside Road, west of
France Avenue, north of 50`h Street and east of Arden Avenue) contains over
125 homes. At an average of 14 trips per day per household (typical to this area of
Edina) this travel shed would generate over 1,750 daily vehicle trip ends. This
condition is what would keep the daily traffic volume on Maple Road at higher levels
even if the "through" traffic is reduced.
• The level of "through" traffic on Maple Road is similar to other neighborhoods in
Edina which have also been studied. Neighborhoods such as: Tracy Avenue between
West 66`h Street and West 701h Street, Interlachen Hills and Parkwood Knolls have
similar levels of "through" traffic volumes that amount to 200 to 400 "through"
vehicles per day. To date the City has not taken any significant actions in these
neighborhoods. The exception to this is the Country Club neighborhood where the
"through" traffic volume was "thousands" of vehicles per day. In this exceptional
case the City did take remedial action, not so much to reduce or eliminate the
"through" traffic but more to redistribute it to more streets in an effort to share the
burden.
• In the case of the Maple Road neighborhood, as well as the Country Club
neighborhood, the high level of congestion and delay in the area of West 50' Street
and France Avenue is the cause of the neighborhood "through" traffic. Travel time
runs through the study area during the afternoon peak period indicate that it is, on the
average, 90 seconds faster to cut - through the neighborhood than to use the
50'' Street/France Avenue area. As was found in the Country Club neighborhood the
City couldn't install enough additional stop signs or speed humps on Maple Road to
make up for that kind of travel time advantage. One stop sign increases travel time by
12 -15 seconds if the driver fully stops. To increase the travel time through the
neighborhood enough to make the travel time the same on each route would take
six additional stops, more if the route through the area of 50`h Street and
France Avenue was to be fast enough to pull the "through" traffic out of the
neighborhood. There are only four intersections along the Maple Road/48`h Street
route. Speed humps offer even less of an increase in travel time and would therefore
not be effective in reducing "through" traffic.
Traffic Safety Committee - 3 - April 16, 1998
• Speed humps can be effective in reducing speeds in the immediate area of the hump
(100 to 200 feet from the hump). However, upon review of the Maple Road speed
samples collected by the City, the 85' percentile speed was found to be 29 mph. This
indicates that a speeding problem does not exist on Maple Road. If the 85`, percentile
speed was significantly over 30 mph, a speeding problem would be indicated. But
since 15 percent of drivers will exceed the posted speed limit or safe speed,
irrespective of attempts to lower their speeds by any means, an 85' percentile speed
of 30 mph or less is considered acceptable in a 30 mph zone.
• Speed humps are not considered a low cost action. In order to construct a speed
hump that; follows traffic safety guidelines, is effective in reducing speeds to 15 to
20 mph, does not impede street surface drainage, is easily cleared of snow and ice and
is attractive enough to place in a neighborhood setting, the City/neighborhood would
need to spend between S10,000-$15,000 for each speed hump needed. And in order
to be effective in reducing overall speeds these humps would need to be installed at
intervals of 500 to 600 feet. At least three to maybe four speed humps would be
needed on Maple Road between 50`h Street and 48' Street to be effective in reducing
the higher vehicle speeds. Estimated cost, $30,000 to $60,000.
• Signs such as "Local Traffic Only" or "No Through Traffic" cannot be enforced by
the City since Maple Road is a public street. It would be unlawful for the City to
exclude anyone from using this publicly operated and maintained street.
• Banning the eastbound to northbound left -turn during the peak periods at Maple Road
and 50" Street could help reduce the "through" traffic, but only in direct proportion to
the level of enforcement of that turn restriction. Additionally, it would be unlawful
for the City to selectively enforce this turn restriction by enforcing the ban for non-
residents but allowing the residents to make the banned turn. The "No Left Turn"
sign means "Pk" left turns. This turn restriction would result in a significant
inconvenience for many of the neighborhood residents.
• The most effective actions to reduce "through" traffic in the neighborhood would
include street closures, cul -de -sacs and traffic diverters. However, once the "through"
traffic is gone what remains is the significant inconvenience to many of the
neighborhood residents who now have a restricted freedom of movement and for
many trips are forced to use the highly congested area of 50' Street and
France Avenue. Should these actions then be reversed, it would not take long for the
"through" traffic to find its way back into the neighborhood.
T r a f f i c Safety Committee - 4 - April 16, 1998
• Probably the best solution to the Maple Road neighborhood "through" traffic problem
would be to improve traffic operations in the area of 50`' Street and France Avenue in
order reduce the high level of congestion and delay. However, the streetscape theme
and on- street parking in the area would need to be compromised in order to add traffic
lanes, because only adding lanes in this area will result in significant improvement.
There maybe some minor improvements that could be made to the traffic signal
system operation such as. a leading southbound left-turn phase at 50'h Street and
France Avenue, but this would only result in a minor traffic operations improvement.
Peak period on- street parking restrictions could also be considered.
• The Edina City staff is currently engaged in discussions with the City of Minneapolis
staff related to traffic signal system interconnect between France Avenue and
Halifax Avenue on 50' Street. This system interconnect could improve traffic
operations on 50' Street substantially. This improvement would include replacement
of the traffic signal control hardware at both intersections along with a hardwire
twisted pair interconnect.
• A public street, no matter what traffic volume or speed level is present, should never
be characterized or considered as a "safe" environment for children to play or for
older /senior residents to walk within or adjacent to. Mixing children (especially at
play) and older /senior residents with moving vehicles is an inherently dangerous
condition. It can not be recommended that the City take any action that could be
interpreted as an endorsement of this interaction between playing children/older/
senior residents and vehicular traffic on a public street.
• The best action that can be taken to protect children and other pedestrians, is to
separate them from the vehicular traffic. This can be done by constructing sidewalks
and/or trails separated from the roadway, and/or by providing close parent or adult
caretaker supervision whenever these groups are in close proximity to or within the
roadway.
wOE) f\ L\
City Of Edina
May 5, 1998
Dear Residents of Edgebrook Place:
On November 17, 1997, the City Council, because of a consensus among you the
residents of Edgebrook Place, changed the direction of the one way on your street.
It has been brought to our attention that several of the very residents who requested the
change are now violating that change.
Let me remind those of you who are doing this that driving the wrong way on a one way
street is a violation of the traffic law and you can be cited for this violation.
If these actions persist, the Traffic Safety staff will go back to the City Council to have
the one way changed back to the direction it was prior to November 17, 1997.
Please inform all those who frequent your residences as to the proper use of
Edgebrook Place.
Please help make your neighborhood a safer place by using the street properly.
Sincerely,
Vince Bongaart
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City of Edina
826 -0349
VB /clf
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5361
May 5, 1998
City of Edina
Dear Residents Adjacent Alley Between Grimes and Wooddale:
It has been brought to our attention, again, that some of the vehicles using the alley between
Grimes and Wooddale are exceeding the 10 MPH speed limit even to the point of careless driving.
On April 9, 1997, we sent a letter out to all of you adjacent to the alley, regarding this, situation.
Unfortunately, we have to address this again as there are a few who haven't got the message.
Alleys can be notoriously dangerous for children, pets that get loose, and also vehicles exiting
their garages and driveways. That is why alleys are posted at 10 MPH. Even 10 MPH can be too
fast when a child darts out from between a garage and our mind is on something other than our
driving.
By slowing down and paying attention to the numerous blind spots in an alley, we hopefully will
have more time to react to whatever pops out in front of us. No one wants the awful trauma of
hurting someone or something. Anyone that's been in an accident, no matter how minor, knows of
the terrible feelings it can produce for everyone concerned.
It should go without saying that children should be kept out of the alley and educated to the safe
boundaries of yard and driveway.
We could line the alley with speed bumps but that cost is assessed to the residents and makes for
poor snow removal in winter. Hopefully with a little cooperation from everyone, drastic measures
won't be necessary.
And, just per change there is an individual that doesn't want to cooperate, please get their license
number, a description if possible, of driver and car, and we will make contact with them.
Please help make your neighborhood a safer place by slowing down and paying attention to your
driving.
Sincerely,
eVince Bongaa' s
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City of Edina
826 -0349
VB /clf
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 16121 937 - 7635
EDINA, MINNESOTA 123 -1393 TDD 16121 927 -5361
39
FOR ACTION
INDEPEIMENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, July 14, 1997
volume 69, Report 18
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Direct administration to pursue with the city an
investigation of traffic patterns on the city streets
surrounding our schools and bring recommendations to
the Board of Education by January 1998 that will
promote the increased safety of the students who walk
to school in our district.
BACKGROUND INFORMATICN
It has been brought to our attention by numerous sources (prin-
cipals, parents, site councils, and city residents) that the
traffic levels or, streets surrounding some of our schools have
significantly grown in the last few years. In order to better
understand this important matter, we believe a complete investi-
gation is urgently needed to help facilitate the safety of those
Edina students who wain to school each day.
Because ae share this concern with the Citv of Edina, a
partnership between the school district and the city may be one
way to begi -r the investigation of traffic patterns around the
schools and the subsequent :impact on wailers. More than ten
years ago a study was conducted concerning traffic on 70th
Street. As a result of this previous,study, a traffic light was
installed at 70th and Cornelia.
When the current investigation is completed, it is hoped that any
recommendations would be ranked in the order of greatest priority
in the event that implementation would be done in stages as
funds, such as Health and Safety allocations, may become
available.
MINNETO.
EDEN
AGE DAILY TRAFFIC
FIELD
1. LONDONDERRY DR.
2. MCCAILEY LA.
L YCCALLET CIR.
A. ARROWHEAD PASS
5 INDIAN HILL CIR.
Z ING N WAY X.
T. INDIAN POND Cl
B. BLACRFOOT PASS
9. KILL-A -WAY CT.
10. LEE VALLEY RO.
IL YDan ST.
12.LAURA AVE.
13. CASCADE LL
11. MILLPOND Pl.
15. E. SUNNY SLOPE RD.
I6. EDGEBROOA PL.
17. EDINA CT.
IB. HILLTOP LA.
19.ORANGE RD.
20. 5HERWOOD RD.
21. PINEWOOD TR.
22. WARWICK PL.
23. MELODY LAKE RD.
24. NORMANDALE CT.
25. NORIAMDALE AYE.
26. NORMAWALE RD.
27. JOSEPHINE AVE.
28. COLONIAL CT.
29. NORTHFIELD AVE
30. RIDGEVUE AVE.
3L HOLO M AVE.
3L RYMAN AVE.
33. ROBERTY PL.
36 BIRCHCREST DR.
35.11.63ra ST.
36. NANCY LA.
37. DEREY HILL RD.
3B. CHIACH PL.
39.LANTANA LA.
40. YENDELSSOHN LA.
Otte
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item # IV. B.
From:
Francis J. Hoffman --,� J
Consent
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date:
May 18, 1998
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject:
Rule B, Stormwater
Action
F71 Motion
Management
®Resolution
Recommendations of the
Stormwater Task Force
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Pass a resolution requesting the Minnehaha Watershed District approve the Task Force
recommendation for revision to Rule B - Stormwater Management.
Info /Background:
After controversial hearings on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Water
Resources Management Plan during early 1997, it was decided to create a Stormwater
Task Force to look at revising Rule B of the Plan. This Task Force included Watershed
Board members, Watershed staff (administration, legal and engineering) and many
from the attached list.
The Task Force has spent several months working on revising the Rule B. The revised
Rule B per the Task Force is attached. This work product was developed with input
from many cities, regional input, state input and private sector input from developers,
engineers and the Sierra Club representative.
Staff understands from contact with Watershed staff and board members that the Task
Force recommendation may take considerable time for adoption by the Watershed
Board due to some significant changes such as no fees will be collected for regional
ponding as are currently done. The primary reason for the change in this area is that
this fee appears to be an "impact fee" which recently was judged not be legal to collect.
Some disagree with this position on the Board.
As such, staff would recommend that our City Council pass a resolution similar to the
proposed resolution.
SAMPLE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has participated in the revision and Rule B -
Stormwater Management;
AND WHEREAS, the revised Rule B now appears to more clearly define several
water management issues;
AND WHEREAS, the many agencies and individuals involved provided a wide
scope viewpoint to develop a more user friendly document or Rule;
AND WHEREAS, the City of Edina is aware of the hearings requirements of
instituting a rule change in terms of time;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina requests that the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District accept the Task Force's recommendation for
revision to Rule B and initiate the public hearing or comment period as soon as
possible.
STORMWATER TASK FORCE
FAX LIST
A. k�
12/01/97
.Phone #
Fax #
Annis, Daryl
Laketown Township
442 - 5282
442 -6465
Charbonneau, Rick
Sierra Club
722 -4942
379 -3855
Durgunoglu, Ali
HCD
544 -8572
544 -9437
Eastling, Mike
City of Richfield
861 -9792
861 -9749
Elkin, Philip
City of Chanhassen
937 -1900 x105
937 -5739
Gappa, Greg
City of Orono
473 -7357
473 -0510
Goff Bill
City of Victoria
443 -2363
443 -2110
Griffin, Tim
Biko Associates, Inc.
529 -8170
928 -8488
Gross, Monica
MCWD
922 -5356
922 -6652
Gustafson, Lee
City of Minnetonka
939 -8239
939 -8244
Haertel, Jim
BWSR
296 -3767
297 -5615
Hafner, Jim
MCWD
471 -0590
471 -0682
Houle, Wayne
City of Edina
826 -0443
826 -0390
Knaeble, Peter
Terra Engineering
593 -9325
593 -9325
Larsen, Tim
Met Council
602 -1159
602 -1.130
Larson, Bob
City of Deephaven
474 -4755
474 -1274
Lee, Jeff
MPRB
370 -4900
370 -4831
Love, Woody
MCWD
470 -2552
474 -9583
Lynch, Diane
MCWD
471 -0590
471 -0682
Maple, Tom
MCWD
471- 0590
471 -0682
Middleton, Amy
CBE
824 -8637
824 -0506
Oliver, Jeff
City of Golden Valley
593 -8034
593 -3988
Panzer, Mike
Wenck Associates, Inc.
479 -4207
479 -4242
Polston, Bob
City of Mound
472 -0600
472 -5754
Polzin, Jodi
City of Minneapolis
673 -3000
673 -2048
Rardin, Mike
City of St. Louis Park
924 -2500
924 -2663
Schwalbe, Terry
City of Wayzata
404 -5312
404 -5318
Smith, Louis
Smith Parker/MCWD
344 -1400
344 -1550
Soderbeck, Gene
MPCA
296 -6300
282 -6247
Stadler, Steve
City of Hopkins
939 -1338
939 -1381
Strauss, Cell
DNR
772 -7914
772 -7977
Young, Scott
Rust Envir. & infrastructure
551 -2426
551 -2499
A. k�
12/01/97
Gray Freshwater Center
Hwys.15 & 19, Navarre
2500 Shadywood Road
Excelsior, MN 55331 -9578
Phone: (612) 471 -0590
Fax: (612) 471 -0682
Email
admin@minnehahacreek.org
Web Site:
www.minnehahacreek.org
Board of Managers
Pamela G. Blixt
James Calkins
Lance Fisher
Monica Gross
Thomas W. LaBounty
Thomas Maple, Jr.
Malcolm Reid
District Office
Diane P. Lynch
District Administrator
Printed on recycled paper containing
at least 30% past consumer waste.
I innehahtt Creek t IlVatershed I isirict
Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 1, 1998
TO: Mayors, City Managers and Public Works Directors
Chair of Board of Supervisors
Stormwater Task Force
FROM: Diane Lynch, District Administrator
RE: Rule B, Stormwater Management
Recommendations of the Stormwater Task Force
Meeting Tuesday, May 12
2-4:30 p.m.
Boards and Commissions Room
Minnetonka City Hall (note change of building)
(City Hall is right behind the Community Center)
14600 Minnetonka Blvd.
Enclosed are two copies of the last revision of Rule B by the
Stormwater Task Force. One is a copy with the changes indicated and
one is a clean copy.
Please review the changes and be prepared to give your comments to
us at the meeting.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 471 -0590.
Thank you for your continued interest.
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
RULE B
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & EROSION CONTROL
FOR -LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
POLICY. It is the policy of the Board of Managers to:
(a) Require stormwater facilities to be included in land development projects where practicable and
effective.
(b) Manage stormwater and snowmelt runoff on a regional or subwatershed basis throughout the
District to:
I ) promote effective water quality treatment, where feasible, prior to discharge to
surface waterbodies and wetlands;
2) limit developed peak rates of runoff into major surface water bodies to less than or
equal to existing peak rates; and
3) promote infiltration of both precipitation and runoff.
(c) Require preparation and implementation of erosion control plans for land development
activities, during the period of construction.
2. REGULATION. Except as provided herein, prior to commencing any land altering activities, a
developer of land for residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public roadway uses shall submit a
stormwater management plan and an erosion control plan to the District in conformity with the requirements
of this rule and secure a permit from the District approving the stormwater management plan and the
erosion control plan. Except as provided herein, a stormwater management plan and an erosion control plan
are required for new development, redevelopment or additions to an existing site. The managers will review
a stormwater management plan and the erosion control plan only after the applicant demonstrates that the
project has received preliminary approval from the municipality indicating compliance with existing
municipal plans. (Please refer to the "Summary of Regulatory Requirements" below.)
Draft- April 29, 1998
SUMMARY OF REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
LANDUSE/PROJECT REGULATORY RPOUIREMENTc
SINGLE FAMILY HOME
NO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION
SUBDIVISIONS
NO PERMIT
BMP'S
RUNOFF RATE
RUNOFF
LOT SIZE 2:1/2 ACRE
CONTROL.
QUALITY AND
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
BMP'S
RATE CONTROL.
(SINGLE FAMILY HOME)
BMP'S
SUBDIVISIONS
NO PERMIT
BMP'S
RUNOFF
RUNOFF QUALITY AND RATE CONTROL,
LOT SIZE < 1/2 ACRE
RATE
BMP'S
HIGH DENSITY
CONTROL,
RESIDENTIAL
BMP'S
(MULTI UNIT)
ROADS, STREETS AND
SEE SECTION 2(e)
SEE SECTION 2(e)
HIGHWAYS')
COMMERCIAL
BMPs
RUNOFF RATE CONTROL
RUNOFF QUALITY AND RATE CONTROL,
INDUSTRIAL AND
BMP'S
BMP'S
INSTITUTIONAL
1 /21 11 21 31 41 51 81 101 151 201 >20
SUBDIVISION /PROJECT AREA (acres)
NOTE: Administrative permits will be issued whenever BMP's only are required. All other permits and waivers
require a public hearing.
(a) Single - Family Homes. A permit is not required for the construction or reconstruction of a
single family home or its residential appurtenances.
(b) Single- Family, Developed or Redeveloped Subdivisions. A permit is not required from
the MCWD for the construction of less than five (5) acres with a density of two (2) units or less per
acre. A permit is required for residential development or redevelopment of subdivisions with a
density of two (2) units or less per acre on sites of five (5) acres or more, as follows:
(1) For development or redevelopment of subdivisions of five (5) acres or more but less
than ten (10) acres, the best management practices provisions set forth in section 3 of this
rule are required;
(2) For development or redevelopment of subdivisions of ten (10) acres or more but
less than twenty (20) acres, the best management practices provisions set forth in section 3
and the water quantity control provisions set forth in section 4 of this rule are required;
Draft - April 29, 1998
(3) For development or redevelopment of subdivisions of twenty (20) acres or more.
the best management practices provisions set forth in section 3, the water quantity control
provisions set forth in section 4. and the water quality provisions set forth in section 5 of
this rule are required.
(c) Medium to High Density Residential Land Development. A permit is not required for
the development or redevelopment of residential subdivisions less than two (2) acres with a density
of more than two (2) units per acre. A permit is required for development or redevelopment of
residential subdivisions two (2) acres or greater with a density of more than two (2) units per acre,
as follows:
(1) For development or redevelopment of subdivisions of two (2) acres or more but less
than five (5) acres. the best management practices provisions set forth in section 3 of this
rule are required;
(2) For development or redevelopment of subdivisions of five (5) acres or more but less
than -eight (8) acres, the best management practices provisions set forth in section 3 and the
water quantity control provisions set forth in section 4 of this rule are required;
(3) For development or redevelopment of subdivisions of eight (8) acres or more, the
best management practices provisions set forth in section 3, the water quantity control
provisions set forth in section 4, and the water quality provisions set forth in section 5 of
this rule are required.
(d) Commercial, Industrial, or Institutional Development or Redevelopment. A permit is
required for commercial, industrial, or institutional development or redevelopment, as follows:
(1) For all commercial, industrial, or institutional development or redevelopment, the
best management practices provisions set forth in section 3 of this rule are required;
(2) For development or redevelopment activities on sites of one -half (1/2) acre or more
but less than eight (8) acres, the best management practices provisions set forth in section 3
and the water quantity control provisions set forth in section 4 of this rule are required;
(3) For development or redevelopment activities on sites of eight (8) acres or more, the
best management practices provisions set forth in section 3, the water quantity control
provisions set forth in section 4, and the water quality provisions set forth in section 5 of
this rule are required.
(e) Roads, Streets and Highways. A permit is not required for the maintenance or
improvement of a public or private road, street or highway, if the project does not result in a net
increase in impervious surface. A permit is required for a public or private road, street, or highway
project that results in a net increase in impervious surface area, as follows:
(1) For projects that result in a net increase in impervious surface of less than one (1)
acre, the best management practices in section 3 of this rule will be required;
(2) For projects that result in a net increase in impervious surface of one (1) acre or
more, but the total project area is less than five (5) acres, the best management practices
Draft - April 19, 1998
provisions set forth in section 3, and the water quantity control provisions set forth in
section 4 are required to treat the increase;
(3) For projects that result in a net increase in impervious surface of one (1) acre ore
more and the total project area is five (5) acres or more, the best management practices
provisions set forth in section 3, the water quantity control provisions set forth in section 4,
and the water quality provisions set forth in section 5 of this rule are required to treat the
increase;
(4) Sidewalks and trails.which do not exceed ten (10) feet in width do not require a
permit and are not included in any calculation of net increase in impervious surface when
part of a road or street project.
(f) Performance Bond. A performance bond or other surety in a form satisfactory to the
District is required for all activity, including clearing, grading, and excavation, that results in the
disturbance of five (5) or more acres of land. The District will not require a performance bond or
other type of surety from cities, townships, municipal corporations, counties, the state or federal
government, or agencies of any of the aforementioned.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Permanent (Structural and Non- structural). Permanent BMPs consist of structural and non-
structural practices. Permanent BMPs must be incorporated in all projects requiring a permit under
this rule and must be consistent with specifications of the MPCA manual "Protecting Water Quality
in Urban Areas (revised July 1991) and its future revisions. Other permanent BMPs, not addressed
in the MPCA manual may be allowed on an experimental basis if their use will generate new and
useful data or information regarding effectiveness of the practice. The following table is a summary
of the MPCA BMPs and their effectiveness for removal of metals, phosphorus, nitrates, and
suspended solids from stormwater, and for controlling rates and volumes of runoff.
BMP Type
Effectiveness of Selected BMPs
Metals
Total
Phosphorus
Dissolved
Phosphorus
Nitrates
Total Suspended
Solids
Floafablas
Runoff
Rats
Control
Runoff
Volume Control
Structural
Infiltration (no overflow)
high
high
high
high
high
high
yes
yes
Dry Detention (24 hr)
moderate
low
low
low
moderate
outlet
specific
yes
low
Oillgrit separators
moderate
low
no
no
low
yes
no
no
Skimmers
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
Grass striplswale
moderate
low
low
low
moderate
low
low
low
Diversions
no
no
no
no
design specific
no
partial
partial
Non - structural
Wetlands
yes
yes'
yes•
yes-
yes
yes
yes
partial
organic litter management
low
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Street sweeping
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
Draft - April 29, 1998 10
fertilizer management
mod -high
mod -high
'•
no
no
no
no
catch basin cleaning
low
no
no
no
low••'
no
no
no
sub -grade preparation
non - phosphorus fertilizers
Temporary
Temporary silt fence
yes
yes
no
no
yes ...
no
no
no
Straw bales
yes
yes
no
no
yes '•'
no
no
no
Temporary sediment basin
yes
yes
design specific
••
yes
outlet
specific
design
specific
low
Rock entrance pad
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no
Natural wetlands can also contribute nutrients
No data to evaluate effectiveness
Small volumes only
(b) Temporary BMPs must be incorporated in all projects requiring a permit under this rule, as
follows:
(1) An Erosion Control Plan must be prepared by a qualified individual showing
proposed methods of retaining waterborne sediments on -site during the period of
construction and showing how the site will be restored, covered, or revegetated after
construction;
(2) The Erosion Control Plan shall be consistent with specifications of the MPCA
manual "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" (revised July 1991) and its future
revisions;
(3) Permanent detention/retention ponds, used as temporary sedimentation basins must
be cleaned out after construction is complete;
(4) Erosion control measures, such as silt fences and hay /straw bales shall be removed
after all disturbed areas have been fully stabilized;
(5) Sites with high erosion potential characterized by steep slopes or erodible soils may
be subject to the provisions of section 2, paragraph (f) of this rule.
4. WATER QUANTITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
(a) The peak rate of stormwater runoff from the site shall not increase as a result of the proposed
development. Developed peak rates of runoff shall be controlled such that the existing peak rates
are not exceeded. This criteria shall be analyzed and met for runoff producing events of critical
duration with return frequencies of 1, 10 and 100 years in the subwatershed in which the site is
located.
Draft - April 29, 1998
(b) Natural existing low areas will be used. where feasible, for detention of runoff to comply with
rate control criteria. Reservoir routing procedures and critical duration runoff events shall be used
for design of detention areas and outlets.
(c) The proposed project shall not adversely affect water levels off the site during or after
construction.
(d) Runoff tributary to the project must be accommodated in the analyses and design of new
stormwater management facilities.
(e) The volume of runoff may not increase due to the project when the receiving area of said runoff
is landlocked, and not capable of handling the increased volume of runoff. In addition, the applicant
shall either own or have proper rights over the landlocked property to handle water from the
development. Back -to -back 100 -year runoff events will be used to analyze holding capacity and
freeboard for landlocked areas.
(f) All stormwater rate control facilities shall be located above the projected 100 -year flood
elevation for the site and within drainage, utility and/or flowage easements to provide access and to
prevent future alteration or encroachment.
(g) Water quantity control methods and facilities used or constructed pursuant to this rule shall be
in conformance with approved Municipal Stormwater Management Plans.
(h) The outfall structures shall incorporate designs to minimize erosion and scouring.
(i) New buildings and structures shall have door and window openings a minimum of two feet
above the 100 year high water elevation.
WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS.
(a) Wet detention pond shall be designed for at least 50% phosphorus removal efficiency. The
applicant shall use the PondNet (or approved equivalent) model to determine removal efficiency of
the pond, using a 2.5" rainfall. Total tributary drainage area shall be used to calculate permanent
pool volume. Pond outlets shall remove floatables from runoff before discharge for a 1 year event.
All ponds must provide a ten (10) foot safety bench at a slope no steeper than l OH: IV and two (2)
feet of freeboard above the 100 year pond level.
(b) The outfall structures shall incorporate designs to minimize erosion and scouring.
(c) New buildings and structures shall have door and window openings a minimum of two feet
above the 100 year high water elevation.
6. REQUIRED EXHIBITS (SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE).
(a) If the water quantity or water quality provisions set forth in sections 4 and 5 of this rule apply to
a proposed development, plans certified by a professional engineer registered in the State of
Minnesota and reflecting the following items shall accompany the permit application (one set of
plans must be full size; one set must be reduced to a maximum size of 1 l" x 17 "):
Draft - Apri119, 1998 12
(1) Property lines and delineation of lands under ownership of the applicant.
(2) Delineation of the subwatershed contributing runoff from off -site and proposed and
existing subwatersheds on -site.
(3) Proposed and existing stormwater facilities location, alignment, and elevation.
(4) Delineation of existing on -site wetland, marshes, shoreland, and /or floodplain areas.
(5) Existing and proposed normal, and 100 year water elevations on -site.
(6) Existing and proposed site contour elevations at two foot intervals, related to NGVD,
1929 datum.
(7) Construction plans and specifications of all proposed stormwater management facilities.
(8) Stormwater runoff volume and rate analyses for the 1, 10 and 100 year critical events,
existing and proposed conditions.
(9) All hydrologic, water quality, and hydraulic computations completed to design the
proposed stormwater management facilities.
(10) Documentation indicating conformance with an existing municipal stormwater
management plan. When a municipal plan does not exist, documentation that the
municipality has reviewed the project.
(11) Delineation of any flowage easements or other property interests dedicated to
stormwater management purposes, including, but not limited to, county or judicial ditches.
(12) Documentation that the project has received a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) if required by the MPCA, once available.
(b) A maintenance agreement shall be submitted for: stormwater treatment ponds, outlet structures
for such ponds, culverts, outfall structures, and all other stormwater facilities. The maintenance
agreement shall specify the methods, schedule and responsible parties for maintenance and must
include at a minimum, the elements contained in the District's Maintenance Agreement Form. A
Maintenance Agreement Form will be provided to the applicant for use by the applicant as a
maintenance agreement or as guidance if the applicant desires to draft a separate maintenance
agreement. The maintenance agreement must be recorded with the county within 10 days of the
issuance date of the permit.
(c) Geotechnical soil boring results if available.
EXCEPTIONS.
(a) If the District has approved a municipal stormwater management plan for a municipality, or for
a subwatershed within a municipality, the requirements of this rule may be deemed satisfied upon
showing of compliance by an individual developer with the municipal plan.
Draft - April 29, 1998 13
(b) The water quantity requirements of this rule will be waived upon a determination by the Board
of Managers that a downstream facility(ies) is in place or has been ordered and the facility(ies) is
designed with adequate capacity to limit the peak runoff rate from the subwatershed under fully
developed conditions. The water quantity requirements of this rule may also be waived upon a
determination by the Board of Managers that the time of concentration of the downstream receiving
water body is sufficiently long such that limiting the peak rate of runoff from the project has either
no practical effect or an adverse effect.
c) The water quality requirements of this rule will be waived upon a determination by the Board of
Managers that a downstream facility(ies) is in place or has been ordered and the facility(ies) is
designed to remove at least 50% of the total phosphorus from runoff entering the facility from the
subwatershed under fully developed conditions.
Draft - April 29, 1998 14
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman
Director of Public Works
Date: May 18, 1998
Subject: Transfer of Dump Truck to
Independent School
District 273
Recommendation:
Approve transfer of vehicle.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # Iv. c.
Consent ,®
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Per the attached memorandum, staff has been working with the School District staff on
a transfer of a used vehicle to the School District.
Through past cooperation, the City received carpentry equipment that was usable by
the City. This used equipment's value certainly exceeds the value of the proposed
transfer.
r
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 12, 1998
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Steve Johnson, Public Works Coordinator 6A
SUBJECT: DONATION OF USED DUMP TRUCK TO IND SCHOOL DIST 273
The maintenance department of the local school district has an
interest in one of our used dump trucks, which they would like to
use for plowing their parking lots, etc.
We typically send two of these trucks to the Hennepin County
auction annually. In the past years, these truck have sold for
anywhere from $6500 to $12,000 depending on condition and
equipment sent with them such as plows, sanders, etc.
The truck they are interested in is a 12 year old truck equipped
with a front plow and rear sander. (Our unit #25.345.) It is my
opinion that the value, and a fair price for this truck would be
$10,500.
Some time ago the School District donated two complete Industrial
Arts classrooms of carpentry equipment to the City. We are
currently using this equipment in several areas. Donating this
dump truck to them would be a good form of repayment to them. I
would think that the dollar amount for both sides would be
comparable.
SJ /dj
o e
• f�a'�"'`��
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman
City Engineer W1
Date: May 18, 1998
Subject: Final Plan Approval
Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -391
Tower St. to Minnehaha Creek and
SS -392 St. John's /Ashcroft to Brookview
Avenue
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # IV. D.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
❑ To H RA
® To Council
❑ Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Approve final plans and authorize bids for Sanitary Sewer Improvement Projects
SS -391 and SS -392.
Info /Background:
These projects are part of the recommended sanitary sewer changes to provide
sanitary sewer trunk system bypasses. The first project, SS -391, is from a point on
Tower Street just west of St. Johns Avenue east to Wooddale Avenue, then north on
Wooddale Avenue to W. 56th Street, thence easterly on W. 56th Street to Woodland
Road just east of Minnehaha Creek. This twelve inch diameter bypass system is
estimated to cost between $538,400 to $617,000 depending on the type of
construction. The project will be bid with two different methods of construction. The
first method is traditional open cut trench and the second is a directional boring method
which disturbs much less area for construction. Staff will take bids and evaluate the
cost benefit of both methods prior to award of the project.
The second project, SS -392, will follow the north frontage road of the Crosstown
Highway from Ashcroft Avenue to Rose Court, then proceed east via underground
jacking method or directional boring to reach a sanitary sewer manhole just north of the
Valley View Road interchange with Crosstown Highway 62. This project involves
constructing an eighteen inch diameter bypass system. This project also requires
Minnesota Department of Transportation permits as the project will be on their right -of-
way for a portion of the project. The estimated cost of this project has risen since the
Feasibility Report was filed with City Council.
Report/Recommendation
Agenda Item IV.D.
Page Two
The current estimated cost is $374,000 which includes engineering, legal,
administration and a 10% contingency as did the earlier project. This project during
final design with additional review with Mn /DOT and soil borings, requires some
different construction methods than an open cut trench. Staff again would take bids
and evaluate the cost benefit prior to recommending award of the project.
As such, staff would recommend final approval of both projects and that bids be taken
to evaluate the alternate methods of construction.
AGENDA ITEM: IX.A.
Memo
To: Ken Rosland, City Manager
From:John Wallin, Finance Director
Date: May 15, 1998
Re: Set Dates For the 1999 Budget Meetings
Attached is the tentative calendar of events for the 1999 budget process. The dates
for Council meetings on the 1999 budget are as follows:
DATE
TIME
AGENDA
June 15
5:OOP.M.
Staff to present budget assumptions
July 6
5:OOP.M.
Final budget assumption presentation. If another
meeting is expected, a 5:00 meeting could be
scheduled July 13.
August 12 & 19
5:OOP.M.
Budget hearings with full detail budget for
departments, boards, commissions, and the public.
September 8
7:OOP.M.
Council to adopt resolution approving preliminary
budget and levy
Nov. 30 to Dec. 19
5:OOP.M.
Hold truth in taxation hearings. Actual hearing
dates cannot be determined until after August 15.
Recommendation: Approve the 1999 budget meetings as listed above.
COUNCIL
C REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
---------------------------------------------------------------=--------------------------------------------------------------------
188842
05/18/98
$648.64
A LAPOINTE SIGN INC
NAME TAGS
9749
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
3451
< *>
$648.64*
188843
05/18/98
$85.00
A -1 ROOTMASTER
Contracted service
9800291
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
3897
< *>
$85.00*
188844
05/18/98
$290.30
AAA
TITLE, ETC #25 -521
050898
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$290.30*
188845
05/18/98
$134.19
Aasen, Laurie
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
050898
GOLF ADMINISTR
MILEAGE
< *>
$134.19*
188846
05/18/98
$1,895.70
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
INVERTER
043583
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
2429
< *>
$1,895.70*
18884.7
05/18/98
$2,609.25
ACE SUPPLY
lleatero
1.51170
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1905
< *>
$2,609.25*
188848
05/18/98
$5,676.94
ACT ELECTRONICS INC
Cabinet
5273
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
EQUIP MAINT
9732
05/18/98
$5,676.94
ACT ELECTRONICS INC
Cabinet
6614
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
1906
< *>
$11,353.88*
188849
05/18/98
$191.85
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
Mail process
72610
G,ENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$191.85*
188850
05/18/98
$140.00
Action Stump Removal
Stump removal & resto
980147
TREES & MATNTE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$140.00*
188851
05/18/98
$24.64
ADAMS, RITA K.
TELEPHONE
050698
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$24.64*
188852
05/18/98
$294.73
Adams
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
10035102
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
1724
< *>
$294.73*
188853
05/18/98
$352.78
ADVANCE SHORING CO
TRENCH RESCUE SUPPLIE
1217068
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4037
< *>
$352.78*
188854
05/18/98
$111.67
ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
015607
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQUI
3858
< *>
$111.67*
188855
05/18/98
$41.00
Aearo Company
SAFETY GLASSES
03973007
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
3947
< *>
$41.00*
188856
05/18/98
$147.78
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Cell batteries
041798
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$28.56
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
#1003 -13
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
< *>
$176.34*
188857
05/18/98
$15.66
ALBINSON
Vellum reproduction
705159
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CIP
3706
< *>
$15.66*
188858
05/18/98
$234.00
ALEXANDER, PETE
SOFTBALL, OFFICIAL,
n51198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$234.00*
188859
05/18/98
$126.24
ALL FIRE TEST INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
021291
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
05/18/98
$469.26
ALL FIRE TEST INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
21290
EQUIPMENT OPER
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -MnY -1998 (19:00)
page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$595.50*
188860
05/18/98
$154.50
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
3651
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$211.50
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
3467
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$210.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
00003760
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$183.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
00003780
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$759.00*
188861
05/18/98
$18.00
Althauser, Tom
Refund handicap svc
042798
GOLF PROG
COMPUTR HANDIC
< *>
$18.00*
188862
05/18/98
$125.00
American Cup Tournament
ADVERTISING OTHER
02151
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
3820
< *>
$125.00*
188863
05/18/98
$29.40
American Express
Food & wine mag
093107
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$29.40*
188864
05/18/98
$206.65
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
043098
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
05/18/98
$30.36
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
043098
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
05/18/98
$177.73
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
043098
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
05/18/98
$46.52
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
043098
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
05/18/98
$253.22
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
043098
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
05/18/98
$57.94
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
043098 .
".VERNON SELLING
LAUNDRY
05/18/98
$43.70
Ameripride Linen & Appar
LAUNDRY
STATEMEN
GRILL
LAUNDRY
< *>
$816.12*
188865
05/18/98
$188.19
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
293922
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
05/18/98
- $14.07
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
758815
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
05/18/98
- $29.88
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
758817
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
< *>
$144.24*
188866
05/18/98
$55.00
Anderson, Chester
Refund patron card
042898
GOLF PROG
MEMBERSHIPS
< *>
$55.00*
188867
05/18/98
$1,495.00
Application Dev Train Co
Web development
042998
COMMUNICATIONS
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$1,495.00*
188868
05/18/98
$5.33
AQUA ENGINEERING
Shop
030943
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3567
05/18/98
$20.24
AQUA ENGINEERING
Shop
030944
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3568
05/18/98
$20.29
AQUA ENGINEERING
Street
031082
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3657
< *>
$45.86*
188869
05/18/98
$544.96
Architectural Consultant
Repair parts
019019
SKATING & HOCK
REPAIR PARTS
3196
< *>
$544.96*
188870
05/18/98
$560.00
ASCAP
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
042098
ARENA ADMINIST
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$560.00*
188872
05/18/98
$327.84
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$74.08
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$19.95
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
FIRE SUPPLIES
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$172.36
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$327.84
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$119.02
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$280.57
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVA
COUNCIL.Ci. REGISTER
14- - 1998 (19:00)
page 3
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
- - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
188872
05/18/98
$204.05
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$558.23
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$256.22
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198-
MAINT OF.COURS
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$40.43
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
FRED RICHARDS
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$154.02
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
POOL OPERATION
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$397.69
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$40.46
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$669.62
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
ED BUILDING &
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$21.65
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH,REMOVA
05/18/98
$61.54
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98,
$61.54
Aspen Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
050198
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH REMOVA
< *>
$3,787.11*
188873
05/18/98,
$39.49
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
REPAIR PARTS
T69047
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3876
05/18/98,
$19.75
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
REPAIR PARTS
T69049
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3878
05/18/98
$31. -85
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
REPAIR PARTS
T69417
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3877
05/18/98,
$78.76
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
Radio
T69610
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3562
05/18/98'
- $78.76
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
Credit radio
T69911
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3562
< *>
$91.09*
188874
05/18/98
$24.04
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
TELEPHONE
041196
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
< *>
$24.04*
188875
05/18/98
$8.52
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
iDMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98.
$4.26
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$12.78
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$27.46
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$4.26
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$4.26
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98'
$12.78
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98]
$17.04
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/981
$21.30
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98,
$4.26
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98''
$4.26
AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES
PW pagers
4204032
VERNON LIQUOR
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$121.18*
188876
05/18/981,
$4.56
AT &T
TELEPHONE
041898
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$1.50
AT &T
TELEPHONE
041898
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
05/18/98:
$10.96
AT &T
TELEPHONE
042498
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$17.02*
188877
05/18/98
$14.00
AT &T
TELEPHONE
041898
ADMINISTRATION
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$3.18
AT &T
TELEPHONE
041898
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$28.78
AT &T
TELEPHONE
041898
PARK MAINTENAN
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$18.76
AT &T
TELEPHONE
041898
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
< *>
$64.72*
1.8887n
n5 /18 /9n
$402.48
AUC;TE'S TNC.
COST OF MODS SOLD
STATEMEN
FRED RICHARDS
(7nST OF rr) SOL
< *>
$402.48*
188879
05/18/98
$593.26
AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
043098
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
05/18/.98'
$143.78
AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
O43098/G
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$737.04*
188880
05/18/98
$37.80
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
12073
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
3167
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -PLAY -1998 (19:00)
page 4
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-----------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188880
05/18/98
$165.54
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA
Shop
12264
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
3186
< *>
$203.34*
188881
05/18/98
$7,265.38
AWARDS BY HAMMOND INC.
Medallions
32809
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
2981
05/18/98
$2,817.56
AWARDS BY HAMMOND INC.
Silver bowl awards
32810
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3140
< *>
$10,082.94*
188882
05/18/98
$30..35
AWARDS ETC LLC
EXPLORERS
15384
RESERVE PROGRA
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$30.35*
188883
05/18/98
$117.58
BACHMANS
PLANTS
95715
POOL TRACK GRE
TREES FLWR SHR
3433
05/18/98
$43.46
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2016842
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$161.04*
188884
05/18/98
$16.55
BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH
OFFICE SUPPLIES
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLIE
05/18/98
$28.12
BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
050798
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$44.67*
188885
05/18/98
$40.35
BARINGTON, WILLIAM
MEETING EXPENSE
042898
RESERVE PROGRA
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$40.35*
188886
05/18/98
$18.00
Battcheller, Ron
Computer handicap
042798
GOLF FROG
COMPUTR HANDIC
< *>
$18.00*
188887
05/18/98
$96.69
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
3201
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3519
05/18/98
$315.03
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
3202
GOLF CARS
REPAIR PARTS
3690
05/18/98
$306.61
Battery Wholesale Inc
BATTERIES
3244
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3848
05/18/98
$277.18
Battery Wholesale Inc
BATTERIES
3259
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3538
< *>
$995.51*
188888
05/18/98
$238.50
Beach's Awards
PLAQUES
SCOTT
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
3813
< *>
$238.50*
188889
05/18/98
$225.00
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
14048700
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$158.45
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
27542400
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$124.83
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
27544300
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$124.50
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
14086700
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$227.69
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
14086800
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$21._60
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
27576400
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$250.88
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
27576600
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$1,132.95*
188890
05/18/98
$22.00
Benson, Jim
Refund handicap
050498
GOLF FROG
COMPUTR HANDIC
< *>
$22.00*
188891
05/18/98
$519.65
BERNHJELM, WILLIAM
SPRING CONF
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$519.65*
188893
05/18/98
$10.35
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5530330
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
3475
05/18/98
$64.02
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5530770
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3064
05/18/98
$381.63
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5534310
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3859
05/18/98
$98.96
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5534320
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE:3632
05/18/98
$39.66
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5534670
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3859
05/18/98
$19.13
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5534840
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
3859
05/18/98
$71.57
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5537500
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3859
COUNCIL C.
REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 5
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188893
05/18/98
- $13.01
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CM552424
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
3475
05/18/98
$30.49
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5542330
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3551
05/18/98
$105.22
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5555440
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3796
05/18/98
$174.69
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5555310
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3924
05/18/98
$43.77
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
R180570
YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$11.48
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5560710
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
05/18/98
$84.34
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
FILES
5562570
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3611
05/18/98
$73.15
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5561690
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
3747
05/18/98
$188.66
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BULLETIN BOARD
5564950
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3856
05/18/98
$46.82
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
FILES
5564980
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3825
< *>
$1,430.93*
188894
05/18/98
$14.32
Best Access Systems of
M
VV1 keys
063266
EDINA ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLI
3626
05/18/98
$455.82
Best Access Systems of
M
AC supplies
063429
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3644
05/18/98
$26.84
Best Access Systems of
M
Keys
63367
BUILDINGS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3668
05/18/98
$421.21
Best Access Systems of
M
Ac supplies
063545
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3727
< *>
$918.19*
188895
05/18/98
$228.87
BEST BUY COMPANY INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00501234
MEDIA LAB
GENERAL SUPPLI
3438
< *>
$228.87*
188896
05/18/98
$206.46
Biffs Inc
Sanitation
W20067
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$103.22
Biffs Inc
Sanitation
W20068
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH REMOVA
05/18/98
$85.16
Biffs Inc
Restroom rental
W20069
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
042398
< *>
$394.84*
188897
05/18/98
$77.23
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Asphalt mix
76581
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
2852
05/18/98
$78.42
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Asphalt mix
76597
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
2852
05/18/98
$708.52
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
ASPHALT
76643
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
2852
< *>
$864.17*
188898
05/18/98
$136.50
BLACK, STEVE
UMPIRE
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$136.50*
188899
05/18/98
$1.00.00
BLOOD, DAVID
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
188900
05/18/98
$11.50
Bloom, Duane
Refund golf cent
042998
GOLF PROG
GOLF DOME RECP
< *>
$11.50*
188901
05/18/98
$622.64
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLI
ARCHITECT
53927
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$622.64*
188902
05/18/98
$136.50
Boyd, Kent
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$136.50*
188903
05/18/98
$145.31
BOYER TRUCKS
Shop
710711
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3525
< *>
$145.31*
188904
05/18/98
$1,130.60
BRAUN INTERTEC
Geotechnical evaluati
102170
SAN.SEWER
CIP
05/18/98
$2,215.00
BRAUN INTERTEC
PROF ENG SERVICES
102171
TH 62 /FRANCE
CIP
05/18/98
$1,211.65
BRAUN INTERTEC
Soil boring
102172
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$1,533.15
BRAUN INTERTEC
PROF ENG
102687
TH 62 /FRANCE
CIP
05/18/98
$1,850.60
BRAUN INTERTEC
PROF CONSULTING SERV
102688
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$7,941.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998 (19:00)
page 6
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188905
05/18/98
$179.98
BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY &
Signage
511
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3816
05/18/98
$62.84
BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY &
GENERAL SUPPLIES
511
FRED RICHARDS
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$27.69
BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY &
PRINTING
00000527
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
3818
< *>
$270.51*
188906
05/18/98
$730.00
BROADCAST MUSIC INC
FEES
3039815
ED ADMINISTRAT
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$730.00*
188907
05/18/98
$289.31
Brock White
Shop
07442201
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3518
< *>
$289.31*
188908
05/18/98
$1,192.80
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
LED
31077
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REPAIR PARTS
1914
05/18/98
$55.00
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
Parts
26596AF
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
7218
< *>
$1,247.80*
188909
05/18/98
$6,889.02
Browning Ferris Industri
Refuse
043098
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$34,101.17
Browning Ferris Industri
Recycling
0501
RECYCLING
Recycling Char
< *>
$40,990.19*
188930
05/18/98
$2,126.21
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
Red ag lime
043098
FIELD MAINTENA
INFIELD MIX
< *>
$2,126.21*
188911
05/18/98
$100.00
BUTLER, GEORGE
Police service
MAY 199a "RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
188912
05/18/98
$2,456.95
Cahoy Inc
Pump discharged head
042498
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3155
05/18/98
$43,251.00
Cahoy Inc
PW98 -1
PYMT #1
PUMP & LIFT ST
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$45,707.95*
188913
05/18/98
$91.27
CALLAWAY GOLF
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
90760970
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
3934
< *>
$91.27*
188914
05/18/98
$1,204.96
Camas
READY MIX
1044210
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
2854
05/18/98
$352.52
Camas
CAMAS
1044211
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
2854
05/18/98
$453.69
Camas
CAMAS
1044212
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
2854
05/18/98
$257.20
Camas
RETAIN WALL
316580
RICHARDS MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3871
05/18/98
$514.22
Camas
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
511414
FIELD MAINTENA
SAND,GRVL & RO
2854
< *>
$2,782.59*
188915
05/18/98
$50.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
050898
FINANCE
MILEAGE
< *>
$50.00*
188916
05/18/98
$40.35
CATCO
Shop
368362
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3526
05/18/98
$109.33
CATCO
Shop
368438
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3527
< *>
$149.68*
188917
05/18/98
$95.00
CRT Inc
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1033
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3547
< *>
$95.00*
188918
05/18/98
$345.27
CEILING PRO INTERNATIONA
Cleaning
10712
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQUI
3452
< *>
$345.27*
188919
05/18/98
$40.00
Center for Performing Ar
PRINTING
230
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
< *>
$40.00*
COUNCIL C
REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 7
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
--- - - -- --
188920
-`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05/18/98
$767.94
CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
97178
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
< *>
$767.94*
188921
05/18/98
$438.50
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Adaptive rec coop ins
9600856
ADAPTIVE RECRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$438.50*
188922
05/18/98
$25.56
City Wide Window Service
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
115609
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
05/18/98
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
115610
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
05/18/98
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
115611
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$56.98*
188923
05/18/98
$191.00
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
SCOTT BAGS
43224
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3057
< *>
$191.00*
188924
05/18/98
$117.82
Clark Foodservice Inc
V2 concessions
V262854
VANVALKENBURG
COST OF GD SOL
3630
< *>
$117.82*
188925
05/18/98
$1,151.32
CLEAN -FLO LAB
Aeration system
8083
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,151.32*
188926
05/18/98
$580.00
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER COR
302 - SUPPLIES
50746
SPRING CLEANUP
GENERAL SUPPLI
3948
< *>
$580.00*
188927
05/18/98
$1,800.00
Complete Energy Solution
CONSULTING
EDN972- I,CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,800.00*
188928
05/18/98
$7.46
COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT
ADAPTER
045904
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$7.46*
188929
05/18/98
$330.15
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE
DATA PROCESSING
215690
POLICE DEPT. G
DATA PROCESSIN
3712
< *>
$330.15*
188930
05/18/98
$29.57
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Boots
601938
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
3589
< +>
$29.57*
188931
05/18/98
$312.50
CONTINENTAL CLAY CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
030582
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
2720
< *>
$312.50*
188932
05/18/98
$2,500.00
CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SER
Prof service
042098
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,500.00*
188933
05/18/98
$840.00
CROW - HASSAN NURSERY
TREES
2048
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
3999
< *>
$840.00*
188934
05/18/98
$194.56
Curtis 1000
Envelopes
18510701
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3860
05/18/98
$311.30
Curtis 1000
PRINTING
18611601
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
05/18/98
$758.46
Curtis 1000
Bulk rate envelopes
18652401
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3941
< ;>
$1,264.32*
188935
05/18/98
$100.95
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
095031
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
3412
< *>
$100.95*
188936
05/18/98
$133.28
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS
SPEC OPS TRAILER
7062
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4030
< *>
$133.28*
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998
(19:00)
page 8
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188937
05/18/98
$513.30
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
224145
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
1750
05/18/98
$495.20
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
226072
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$36.05
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
226676
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$194.97
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
226413
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
< *>
$1,239.52*
188938
05/18/98
$16.00
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
FLOURESCENT MARKING
277643
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
2715
05/18/98
$167.21
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Streamlite access
277677
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3065
05/18/98
$593.90
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
AIR BAG REPLACE
277902
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP REPLACEM
3047
05/18/98
$28.00
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
GLOVES
278286
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTHI
3607
< *>
$805.11*
188939
05/18/98
$6.56
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
Gasket
94017
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3665
< *>
$6.56*
188941
05/18/98
$57.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD MI
33.755
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$2,222.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
31756
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$2,016.95
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
31889
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$40.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
31890
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$390.35
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
31977
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$301.35
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
32083
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$2,005.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
32265
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$40.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD MI
32266 . =50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$116.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
32304
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$16.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD MI
32390
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$2,846.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
32396
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$914.80
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
32416
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$953.75
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD BE
32529
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$11,921.00*
188942
05/18/98
$794.14
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
APRIL ST
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
1382
< *>
$794.14*
188943
05/18/98
$70.25
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
YORK FIRE STAT
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$55.80
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$241.38
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$27.90
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
SENIOR CITIZEN
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$15.45
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$13.95
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$14.95
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$27.90'
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$145.80
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$84.70
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$57.80
Department of Administat
TELEPHONE
W980.155
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
< *>
$755.88*
188944
05/18/98
$189.69
DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
172678
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
1942
< *>
$189.69*
188945
05/18/98
$89.90
DIRECTV
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
041698
ARENA ADMINIST
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$89.90*
188946
05/18/98
$1,295.00
DMJ CORPORATION
NEW DRIVEWAY
R -97 -5
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,295.00*
COUNCIL C1 REGISTER
OF
14-
-1998 (19:00)
BE
301349
page 9
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
MI
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
----------7-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188947 05/18/98
$389.20
DON BETZEN GOLF CO
COST
OF GOODS - PRO S
7382
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 9483
05/18/98
$487.45
DON BETZEN GOLF CO
COST
OF GOODS - PRO S
7455
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$50.95
DON BETZEN GOLF CO
COST
OF GOODS - PRO S
7464
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
< *> i
$927.60*
304728
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
188948 05/18/98
188949 05/18/98
< *> !
188950 05/18/98'
05/18/98
05/18/98
188952
188953
188954
05/18/98
05/18/98,
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98.,
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98,
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98'.
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98,
05/18/98
05/18/98
$4,235.84 DPC INDUSTRIES
$4,235.84*
$215.85 DPD
$215.85*
$114.34
$94.08
$78.62
$287.04*
$79.45
$784.33
$0.90
$240.90
$161.65
$609.70
$366.20
$467.90
$62.55
$46.95
$289.80
$562.44
- $138.54
- $60.77
-$0.45
- $121.66
- $51.69
$634.28
$140.85
$444.70
$1,161.82
$5,681.31*
$7,910.33
$7,910.33*
$2,865.40
$98.60
$1,793.30
- $25.80
$1,208.80
$507.60
$4,626.95
$17.20
$17.20
$9.35
$1,964.75
$7,401.60
$20,536.55*
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
Earl Weikle k Sons Inc
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
WATER TREATMENT SUPPL 1262239 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 3325
PRINTING 71633
REPAIR PARTS 35685
REPAIR PARTS 35691
REPAIR PARTS 57445
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01640
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01641
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01642
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04600
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04601
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04602
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04611
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04612
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 04613
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04614
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04624
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 0597
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 085711
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 85708
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 86021
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 86161
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 86162
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 07831
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 07832
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 07843
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 07844
97 -11PK
ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 3935
GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 5190
GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3693
GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3759
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
-YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
FINAL PY PKBOND CIP CIP
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
301349
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
301351
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
301352
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
301353
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
301361
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
302866
COST'
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
304728
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
304729
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
304730
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
304731
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
304734
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
305330
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SEI.I.ING CS'r OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE -
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
14- MAY -1998 (19:00)
page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT.
PO NUM
--------=---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188955
05/18/98
$488.99
Eclipse Electric Mfg Inc
Electrical 50th
500.
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL SUPPLI
3014
< *>
$488.99*
188956
05/18/98
$116.94
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
5330335
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
05/18/98
$99.15
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
PEST ELIMINATION
5330341
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC - CONTR EQUI
< *>
$216.09*
188957
05/18/98
$5,300.00
EDINA FOUNDATION
Celestial ball
042798
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$5,300.00*
188958
05/18/98
$36.12
EDINA HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
657752
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3779
< *>
$36.12*
188959
05/18/98
$597.63
EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN
ROCK FOR PATHS
91659
MAINT OF COURS
SAND,GRVL & RO
3692
< *>
$597.63*
188960
05/18/98
$510.11
EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC
Office supplies
116421
ART CNTR PROG
OFFICE FURN &
3777
< *>
$510.11*
188961
05/18/98
$1,017.55
EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC
Contracted repairs
179483
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$1,017.55*
188962
05/18/98
$240.00
Erickson Architects
Arch svc
050198
FACIL
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$240.00*
.'TRAINING
188963
05/18/98
$10.00
FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPI
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
040398
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$10.00*
188964
05/18/98
$98.60
FAIRVIEW
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
6394
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
2363
< *>
$98.60*
188965
05/18/98
$900.00
Family & Children's Sery
Prof sery
050198
HUMAN RELATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$900.00*
188966
05/18/98
$424.94
FIAM
SPEC OPS TRNG
44233
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TRAINING AIDS
2702
05/18/98
$424.94
FIAM
SPEC OPS TRNG
44245
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TRAINING AIDS
2702
05/18/98
$1,127.84
FIAM
SPEC OP TRNG
44252
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TRAINING AIDS
2702
< *>
$1,977.72*
188967
05/18/98
$71.00
Floral Consultants
MEETING EXPENSE
311.
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING EXPENS
3636
< *>
$71.00*
188968
05/18/98
$127.79
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
-ALARM SERVICE
511416
50TH ST OCCUPA
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$127.79*
188969
05/18/98
$553.63
FOOT -JOY
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
5576895
PRO SHOP
COST -OF GDS -PR
8830
< *>
$553.63*
188970
05/18/98
$2,495.00
Fritz Counter Tops Inc
Concession counter
894
SWIM PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
< *>
$2,495.00*
188971.
05/18/98
$31.10
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Sign shop
046985
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
3829
< *>
$31.10*
188972
05/18/98
$183.00
Gemini Athletic Wear Inc
GENERAL SUPPLIES
.2293
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
9753
COUNCIL
C. . REGISTER
14 -1998
(19:00)
page 11
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$183.00*
188973
05/18/98
$21.89
George, Heather
SKATING INSTRUCTION E
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$21.89*
188974
05/18/98
$1,033.40
Get The Picture Inc
Photography
5263
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,033.40*
188975
05/18/98
$78.00
GIBBONS, MIKE
OFFICIAL
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$78.00*
188976
05/18/98
$270.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
10781
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$188.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
10796
GOLF DOME
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$1,485.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
10818
GOLF DOME
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$405.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
10829
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$405.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
10848
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
05/18/98
$124.00
GOLFCRAFT
RENTAL CLUBS
10849
RANGE
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$1,350.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
10856
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
< *>
$4,227.00*
188977
05/18/98
$39.94
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
Credit card type
19519
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3596
< *>
$39.94*
188978
05/18/98
$887.20
GRAFIX SHOPPE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
27425
- POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
2469
< *>
$887.20*
1889.79
05/18/98
$35.66
GRAINGER
BULBS
789379 -1
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3496
05/18/98
$582.59
GRAINGER
Electric shop
49532412
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
3359
05/18/98
$77.49
GRAINGER
Supplies
49879073
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3760
05/18/98
$205.29
GRAINGER
Elec shop
93799458
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
05/18/98
$126.28
GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
49532507
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
3763
05/18/98
$106.03
GRAINGER
Lockout box
93799608
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
3359
< *>
$1,133.34*
188980
05/18/98
$283.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
18858
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$150.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
18896
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$144.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
18966
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$577.00*
188981
05/18/98
$28.96
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10415575
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3633
05/18/98
$25.51
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
AC electric
10415672
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3585
05/18/98
$112.26
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
AC elect
10416103
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3734
< *>
$166.73*
188982
05/18/98
$87.85
GREAT AMERICAN MARINE
REPAIR PARTS
140954
FIRE DEPT. GEN
REPAIR PARTS'
05/18/98
$275.36
GREAT AMERICAN MARINE
RIP RAP
140954
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RIP RAP
3610
< *>
$363.21*
188985
05/18/98
$1,128.25
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD LI
01644
50T11 ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$1,392.07
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD LI
01647
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$97.20
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD MI
01648
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$37.82
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD LI
01649
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$1,109.11
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD LI
04595
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$4,792.88
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD LI
04599
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$2,116.70
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF GOODS
SOLD LI
04603
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
14- MAY -1998
(19:00)
page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
--------==--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
188985
05/18/98
$4,468.63
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04607
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$3,861.15
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04615.
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$69.36
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04616
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$169.45
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04617.
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$23.30
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04621.
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$4,197.42
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.-
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04622.
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$0.45
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
04623
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$17.34
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07834
VERNON SELLING
CST OF.GD
LIQU
05/18/98
$2,145.70
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07835
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$244.65
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
07838
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$1,469.92
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07839
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$180.64
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07840
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$121.38
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07845
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$2,273.65
GRIGGS.COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07846
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$2,483.29
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07849
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$70.18
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07850
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$60.80
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07851
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU.
05/18/98
$189.78
GRIGGS
COOPER &
CO.'
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
07852
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
< *>
$32,721.12*
188986
05/18/98
$103.53
Griggs
Cooper &
Company
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
2009
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$103.53*
188987
05/18/98
$149.88
HAAGEN
DAZS CO,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
710783
GRILL
COST OF
GD SOL
1384
05/18/98
$149.88
HAAGEN
DAZS CO,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
736468
GRILL
COST OF
GD SOL
< *>
$299.76*
188988
05/18/98
$316.72
HACH CO.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
244255
:DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3570
05/18/98
$160.77
HACH CO.
WATER
TEST SUPPLIES
250355
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3747
< *>
$477.49*
188989
05/18/98
$950.00
Harris
Companies
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
69299
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
3755
05/18/98
$900.00
Harris
Companies
REPAIR
69349
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
3972
< *>
$1,850.00*
188990
05/18/98
$50.00
Heiberg,
Susan
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
050498
HUMAN RELATION
EDUCATION PRGM
< *>
$50.00*
188991
05/18/98
$25.00
HEIM, SUSANNE
Partial
pool refund
042998
POOL ADMIN
SEASON
TICKETS
< *>
$25.00*
188992
05/18/98
$134.10
HEIMARK
FOODS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
12632
GRILL
COST OF
GD SOL
1385
05/18/.98
$134.10
HEIMARK
FOODS
COST
OF
GOODS
- PRO
S
12656
GRILL
COST OF
GDS -PR
< *>
$268.20*
188993
05/18/98
$3,532.54
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
MEDICAL
FIRST
AID
SUPPLIES
6451
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FTRST AID
SUPP
3609
< *>
$3,532.54*
1889n4
05/18/98
$1,227.02
Hennepin
Couriry
Sheriff'
MARCH
98
1- 121 -21
LEGAL SERVICES
COURT CHARGES
< *>
$1,227.02*
188995
05/18/98
$19,198.35
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
TREASURE
PROF
ENG
SERV
28131
STRT IMPRV -HC
CIP
< *>
$19,198.35*
188996
05/18/98
$8,007.26
HENNEPIN COUNTY
TREASURE
BOARD
&
ROOM PRISONER
001738
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
COUNCIL
C!. REGISTER
14- -1998 (19:00)
page 13
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c *>
$8,007.26*
188997
05/18/98
$10,000.00
Hennepin County
Rehab loan paypack
043098
CDBG PROG
OTHER REVENUE
< *>
$10,000.00*
188998
05/18/98
$630.64
HIAWATHA LUMBER CO
SPEC OPS LUMBER
086445
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3616
< *>
$630.64*
188999
05/18/98
$1,386.67
Ho, Jeffery D
Medical service
MAY 1998
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
189000
05/18/98
$640.74
Hoel, Judy
SKATING INSTRUCTION W
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$640.74*
189001
05/18/98
$100.00
HOFFMAN, WILLIAM
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189002
05/18/98
$48.00
Home Juice
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
15011
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$48.00*
189003
05/18/98
$123.64
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL
CHLORINE, ACID
17640
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
3499
< *>
$123.64*
189004
05/18/98
$156.65
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
051198
-TREES & MAINTE
MILEAGE
< *>
$156.65*
189005
05/18/98
$42.58
HOULE, WAYNE D.
MILEAGE
050598
ENGINEERING GE
MILEAGE
05/18/98
$37.95
HOULE, WAYNE D.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
050598
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$80.53*
189006
05/18/98
$45.18
HUEBSCH
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
534338
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
05/18/98
$54.12
HUEBSCH
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
538975
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$99.30*
189007
05/18/98
$648.22
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water meters
12768
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
6388
05/18/98
$2,821.63
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water meters
12767
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
6388
05/18/98
$3,158.14
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water meter
12799
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3553
< *>
$6,627.99*
189008
05/18/98
$73,928.55
HYDRO SUPPLY
96 -1PW
PAYMENT
UTILITY PROG
DISTRIBUTION S
< *>
$73,928.55*
189009
05/18/98
$130.00
IAAO
Member fee for IAAO
042498
ASSESSING
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$130.00*
189010
05/18/98
$40.90
INDELCO PLASTIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
150231
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3581
< *>
$40.90*
189011
05/18/98
$23.63
INLAND TRUCK PARTS
Shop
483482
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3529
< *>
$23.63*
189012
05/18/98
$69.00
INMOTION
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
016872
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
3428
< *>
$69.00*
189013
05/18/98
$329.00
INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS
911 Repair
29784
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
COUNCIL
CHECm REGISTER
14 -1-wY -1998 (19:00)
page 14
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$329.00*
189014
05/18/98
$461.50
INTERLACHEN TRAVEL
NFA AIRFARE
079791
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$461.50*
189015
05/18/98
$475.00
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
School
00124796
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
3749
< *>
$475.00*
189016
05/18/98
$69.22
IOS CAPITAL
EQUIP RENTAL
40577972
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$69.22*
189017
05/18/98
$75.00
IVERSON, KATHY
YOUTH SUMMIT
REGIST.
050798
EDINA CHEM AWA
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$75.00*
18901.8
05/18/98
$540.00
Izzo Systems Tn(-
COST OF
GOODS - PRO S
62014
PRO SHOP
COST OF
GDS -PR
1755
< *>
$540.00*
189019
05/18/98
$137.77
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
AC electric
40626780
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3572
05/18/98
$340.66
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
AC electric
40637760
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3735
05/18/98
$196.43
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
ELECTRICAL
FITTINGS
40646790
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3849
< *>
$674.86*
189020
05/18/98
$89.15
JAMES &
COMPANY INC
PLAQUES
22451
:PARK MEMORIALS
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3713
< *>
$89.15*
189021
05/18/98
$100.00
JAMES,
WILLIAM F
Police
service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189023
05/18/98
$31.06
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$105.28
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$2.30
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$59.27
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$82.09
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$4.33
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$137.30
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$109.33
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
YORK FIRE STAT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$25.09
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$30.81
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$6.78
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$230.54
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$59.14
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
RICHARDS MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$40.49
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$27.00
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$39.42
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$375.37
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$103.72
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$8.41
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$3.23
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
043098
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
< *>
$1,480.96*
189024
05/18/98
$71.78
JERRY'S
PRINTING
PRINTING
A5300
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
3782
< *>
$71.78*
189026
05/18/98
- $82.95
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD LI
58128
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
- $16.11
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD WI
58405
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
C ; REGISTER
14
-1998 (19:00)
page 15
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
---------7--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189026
05/18/98
$149.20
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
833407
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$1,913.08
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
833409
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$1,355.32
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
833410
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
- $26.05
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
58676
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
- $34.25
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
58677
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
-$7.23
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
58807
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$2,044.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
836131
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$1,626.09
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
836132
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$935.95
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
836133
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/96
$5,529.54
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
836134
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$2,940.19
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
836135
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$4,007.10
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
836136
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$1,471.14
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
836137
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$418.87
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
838905
VERNON.SELLING
CST OF
GDS BEE
05/18/98
$418.87
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
BE
838907
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS BEE
05/18/98
$2,497.97
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
838908
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$3,288.00
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
838910
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
05/18/98
$1,752.45
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
WI
838911
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$4,876.67
JOHNSON
WINE CO.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
LI
838912
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD LIQU
< *>
$35,057.85*
189027
05/18/98
$10.00
JOHNSON,
KERRY
Refund overpayment
pl
050198
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION
F
< *>
$10.00*
189028
05/18/98
$13.12
JOHNSON,
NAOMI
ADVERTISING
OTHER
050898
,ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT
OTHER
05/18/98
$24.38
JOHNSON',
NAOMI
CRAFT SUPPLIES
050898
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
05/18/98
$12.67
JOHNSON,
NAOMI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
050898
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$38.16
JOHNSON,
NAOMI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
050898
ART SUPPLY GIF
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$6.06
JOHNSON,
NAOMI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
050898
MEDIA LAB
GENERAL
SUPPLI
< *>
$94.39*
189029
05/18/98
$100.00
JOHNSON,
WALTER
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189030
05/18/98
$112.99
Jowett,
James
REPAIR REIMBURSMENT
041798
FRED RICHARDS
PROF SERVICES
3814
< *>
$112.99*
189031
05/18/98
$908.64
JP FOODSERVICES INC
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
5/1 STMT
GRILL
GENERAL
SUPPLI
05/18/98
$225.67
JP FOODSERVICES INC
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
5/1 STMT
GRILL
CLEANING SUPPL
05/18/98
$4,968.69
JP FOODSERVICES INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
5/1 STMT
GRILL
COST OF
GD SOL
05/18/98
$94.65
JP FOODSERVICES INC
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
064674
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF
GD SOL
4.055
< *>
$6,197.65*
189032
05/18/98
$5.31
JULIEN,
DIANE
Picture
frame
050498
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
< *>
$5.31*
189033
05/18/98
$67.10
JUSTUS LUMBER
Trim
22582
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
3145
05/18/98
$18.53
JUSTUS LUMBER
Trim
22754
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9035
05/18/98
$44.82
JUSTUS LUMBER
Trim
22879
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9035
05/18/98
$498.24
JUSTUS LUMBER
Lumber &
supplies
25423
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
3398
05/18/98
$49.12
JUSTUS LUMBER
Drywall
screws /adhesi
82172
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3715
05/18/98
$52.08
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
27346
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3828
05/18/98
$2,278.76
JUSTUS LUMBER
WINDOWS
27371
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR
PARTS
2413
< *>
$3,008.65*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
14 -Me-+Y -1998 (19:00)
page 16
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189034
05/18/98
$18.00
Kaplan, Carole
Refund duplicate hand
050498
GOLF PROG
COMPUTR HANDIC
< *>
$18.00*
189035
05/18/98
$49.95
KAR
PRODUCTS
SHOP SUPPLIES
757822
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3694
< *>
$49.95*
189036
05/18/98
$152.00
KIFFMEYER, WALLY
SOFTBALL UMPIRE
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$152.00*
189037
05/18/98
$32,073.28
KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC
98 -1 (ENG)
PYMT #1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CIP
< *>
$32,073.28*
189038
05/18/98
$319.50
KINKO'S
PRINTING
06220001
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
3453
< *>
$319.50*
189039
05/18/98
$176.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
89784
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$176.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
89821
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$738.65
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
90071
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$820.65
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
90331
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$497.90
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
90332
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$27.95
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
90333
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$561.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
90334
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$1,125.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
90618 . =YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$525.00
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
90619
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05 /18/98
$725.95
Kiwi
Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
90624
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$5,377.30*
189040
05/18/98
$303.34
KLEINBERG, ERIC
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
042898
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$303.34*
189042
05/18/98
$96.19
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
321994
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3238
05/18/98
$516.22
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
MEDIA LAB
322208
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
3397
05/18/98
$606.25
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Salt shed
322885
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3481
05/18/98
$9.46
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Building supplies
323113
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3476
05/18/98
$313.91
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Salt nhed
323236
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3381
05/18/98
$163.87
KNOX
COMMERCIAL. CREDIT
TRENCH RESCTIE .11113PLIE
323560
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4032
05/18/98
$43.10
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Lumber
323754
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
3659
05/18/98
$71.64
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Street dept supplis
323835
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
3669
05/18/98
$67.49
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
323904
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3670
05/18/98
$146.55
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
323971
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
3708
05/18/98
$25.28
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
SALT SHED
324523
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3740
05/18/98
$175.63
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
SALT SHED
324563
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3243
05/18/98
$52.32
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
SHOP SALT SHED
325201
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3834
< *>
$2,287.91*
189043
05/18/98
$1,500.00
KPMG
PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV -
A
16650371
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC AUDIT
05/18/98
$400.00
KPMG
PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV -
A
16650371
POOL ADMIN
PRO SVC AUDIT
05/18/98
$1,100.00
KPMG
PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV -
A
16650371
ARENA ADMINIST
PRO SVC AUDIT
< *>
$3,000.00*
189044
05/18/98
$29.90
KRULL, JULIE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$29.90*
189045
05/18/98
$573.50
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
209528
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$1,965.40
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
209608
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
C!. REGISTER
14- -1998 (19:00)
page 17
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
----- - - -
189045
- --- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05/18/98
$15.95
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
209609
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$1,947.10
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
210000
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$118.90
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
210098
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$4,679.40
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
210114
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$9,300.25;
189046
05/18/98
$487.16
KUYPER, SCOTT
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$487.16*
189047
05/18/98
$373.05
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
ACCESSORIES
E19137
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3472
05/18/98
$392.81
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
REPAIR PARTS
E19176
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3649
05/18/98
$360.93
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
E19177
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
3650
05/18/98
$309.76
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
E19178
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3651
05/18/98
$199.84
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
E19184
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
3662
05/18/98
$199.99
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
SILICONE
1924888
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3741
05/18/98
$141.33
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
SIGN SHOP
1924889
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3745
05/18/98
$314.85
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
SHOP
1925570
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
3742
05/18/98
$392.15
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
NUTS & BOLTS
1926065
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3833
< *>
$2,684.71*
189048
05/18/98
$465.68
LEBERT, ANITA
FURNITURE
4498
GOLF PROG
CIP
3866
05/18/98
$1,265.00
LEBERT, ANITA
RECOVER LOUNGE FURNIT
042198
GOLF PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
3703
< *>
$1,730.68*
,
189049
05/18/98
$42.49
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
043098
, MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
< *>
$42.49*
189050
05/18/98
$506.76
LEHMANN FARMS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
75300
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$506.76*
189051
05/18/98
$2,041.76
LEITNER COMPANY
SOD & BLACK DIRT
050198
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
< *>
$2,041.76*
189052
05/18/98
$75.00
Lentner, Laura Lee
SAKTING INST. EB
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$75.00*
189053
05/18/98
$10.07
Lesco Inc
Balance due
1P71F2.
TREES & MAINTE
TOOLS
3115
05/18/98
$205.56
Lesco Inc
Course supplies
9RF126
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3925
< *>
$215.63*
189054
05/18/98
$5,931.08
Lester Building systems
97 -12pk
FINAL PY
GOLF PROG
BUILDINGS
< *>
$5,931.08*
189055
05/18/98
$2,976.95
LHB ENGINEERS & ARCHITEC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,976.95*
189056
05/18/98
$196.38
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10613A
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3423
< *>
$196.38*
189057
05/18/98
$150.00
Lucke, Mary
SKATING INST. EB
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$150.00*
189058
05/18/98
$10,901.83
LYLE SIGNS INC.
Signs
41905
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
2519
05/18/98
$4,089.71
LYLE SIGNS INC.
Signs
42969
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
2519
< *>
$14,991.54*
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -mAY -1998 (19:00).
page 18
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-----------=----------------------------------------------
189059
05/18/98
$30.00
-
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
041798
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DUES & SUBSCRI
05/18/98
- $18.00
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
042198
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$12.00*
189060
05/18/98
$46.66
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Street Dept
29803757
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3357
< *>
$46.66*
.189061
05/18/98
$110.00
MACHOLDA,ED
Petty cash
050698
SWIM PROG.
PETTY CASH
05/18/98
$90.00
MACHOLDA,ED
Cash registers
050698
SWIM PROG
CHANGE FUND
< *>
$200.00*
189062
05/18/98
$58.50
Maddox, Tony
SOFTBALL UMPIRE
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$58.50*
189063
05/18/98
$136.50
Mader, Steve
SOFTBALL UMPIRE
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$136.50 *.
189064
05/18/98
- $82.58
Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic
Credit for overpaymen
021998
MAINT OF COURS
SOD & DIRT
05/18/98
$87.86
Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic
STREET DEPT SOD
31438
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3351
05/18/98
$175.73
Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic
STREET.DEPT SOD
31691
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3351
05/18/98
$93.19
Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic
STREET DEPT SOD
31600
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3351
< *>
$274.20*
189065
05/18/98
$303.24
Mail Handling Services
Flushing cards
50769
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
3888
< *>
$303.24*
189066
05/18/98
$584.49
Mairs, Candyce
SKATING INST. ES
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$584.49*
189068 05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
189069 05/18/98
$1,269.10
$452.00
$459.00
$126.00-
$751.95
$2,130.97
$113.05
$1,331.85
$47.25
$1,845.60
$75.70
$18.00
$34.00
$1,193.80
$18.00
$81.55
$2,496.85
$43.50
$72.60
$520.30
$13,081.07*
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VIZ SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
$71.35 MATHISON CO, THE
$71.35*
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 764214
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 764241
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 043098
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 043098
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766659
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766667
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766668
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766673
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 766674
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766879
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 766880
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 766881
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766882
COST -OF GOODS SOLD BE 766883
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 766884
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 766911
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766912
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 766913
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 766914
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 767488
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
GRILL CST OF GDS BEE
FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF•GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST-OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD 118038 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 3778
189070 05/18/98 $251.86 Matrix Communications In TELEPHONE 31568 CENT SVC•GENER TELEPHONE
COUNCIL
C REGISTER
47962
14 -1998 (19:00)
CLEANING SUPPL
3542
Cleaning
page 19
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
----------------------------
<*>
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$251.86*
47989
POOL TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
3501
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
189071
05/18/98
$943.47
MATRX MEDICAL INC
REGULATOR /CYLINDER
611928
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3605
< *>
STOCK SUPPLIES
$943.47*
48049
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3362
Rannl,All
supplies
189072
05/18/98
$978.09
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
6685
POOL TRACK GRE
TREES FLWR SHR
3221
< *>
$978.09*
189073
05/18/98
$104.00
MCCARTHY, LOWELL
WEED INSPECTOR
051198
WEED MOWING
MILEAGE
< *>
$104.00*
189074
05/18/98
$704.85
MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
3626197
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
1389
< *>
$704.85*
189075
05/18/98
$750.00
McGovern, Tim
REFUND SOFTBALL (WOLV
050698
EDINA ATHLETIC
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$750.00*
189076
05/18/98
$161.88
MCKENZIE, TOM
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
042898
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
05/18/98
$10.47
MCKENZIE, TOM
Reimburse
050698
COPS GRANT
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$172.35*
189077
05/18/98
$198.33
Medicare - United
Refund
973630
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$198.33*
189078
05/18/98
$19.99
MEDZIS, ANDREW
GENERAL SUPPLIES
042898
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$19.99*
189079
05/18/98
$33.26
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
TAPE, TIE DOWN
23538
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3801
05/18/98
$72.55
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
HOSES, TOOLS
23560
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3874
< *>
$105.81*
189080
05/18/98
$29.66
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
REPAIR PARTS
25615
RICHARDS MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3931
< *>
$29.66*
189081 05/18/98
c *>
189082 05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
189087 05/1.8/98
189084 05/18/98
189085 05/18/98
$100.00
$100.00*
$962.64
$146.86
$989.38
$562.47
$302.88
$521.85
$451.56
$3,937.64*
$635.33
$6,35.33*
MERFELD, BURT
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
METRO ATTILETTC RTIPPLY
Police service
MAY 1998 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
47962
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
3542
Cleaning
supplies
47979
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3664
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
47983
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
3707
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
47989
POOL TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
3501
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
47997
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
3775
CLEANING
SUPPLIES
48019
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
3855
STOCK SUPPLIES
48049
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
3362
Rannl,All
supplies
26r,12
FIELD MATNTFNA
GF.NERAT, SUPPLI
3561
$1,336.00 Metro Cash Register Syst REGISTERS, SCANNERS M PLAN II GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR E011I
$1,336.00*
$35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES Title /Tax search 814905 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES
$35.00*
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
$596.95
14 -mAY -1998 (19:00)
189090
05/18/98
page 20
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189086
05/18/98
$262,299.91
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
ENV Sewer service
040198
SEWER TREATMEN
SEWER SVC METR
< *>
189093
$262,299.91*
$1,032.15
05/18/98
HEAT
05/18/98
BUILDING MAINT
189087
05/18/98
$3,255.00
MICHALKO, JIM
ANNUAL BRIDGE INSPECT
051198
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$3,255.00*
$151.21
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
MAINT OF COURS
189088
05/18/98
$870.71
Mid America Business
Sys 6 shelfs end file cab
23937
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI 2674
< *>
$870.71*
$3,536.14
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
GOLF DOME
189089
05/18/98
$596.95
MINNEGASCO
189090
05/18/98
FIRE DEPT. GEN
05/18/98
05/18/98
$418.72
05/18/98
HEAT
05/18/98
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
189091
05/18/98
$3,587.39
MINNEGASCO
189092
05/18/98
PW BUILDING
HEAT
189093
05/18/98
$1,032.15
05/18/98
HEAT
05/18/98
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
189094
05/18/98
$431.06
MINNEGASCO
$6,742.50 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORAT 97- 1(ENG)
$6,742.50*
$88.40
$223.05
$151.00
$197.80
$164.40
$824.65*
$137.64
$137.64*
$227.95
$227.95*
$820.50
$540.00
$945.00
$2,305.50*
FINAL PY STREET IMPROVE CIP
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65149039 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65151134 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62834054 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65154138 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62837073 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
MIDWEST VENDING INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 2107 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 1391
MINN COMM PAGING PAGER RENTAL
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace stop box
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service
22509605-FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL
31296 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3887
31299 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3889
31300 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3890
$60.40 MINNEAPOLIS DEPARTMENT O PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19980416 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES
$60.40*
189096
05/18/98
$596.95
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
05/18/98
$418.72
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
05/18/98
$3,587.39
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
PW BUILDING
HEAT
05/18/98
$1,032.15
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
05/18/98
$431.06
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
05/18/98
$151.21
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
05/18/98
$32.97
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
FRED RICHARDS
HEAT
05/18/98
$3,536.14
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
GOLF DOME
HEAT
05/18/98
$2,278.24
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
05/18/98
$337.50
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
05/18/98
$1,029.88
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
ED BUILDING &
HEAT
05/18/98
$511.41
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
05/18/98
$2,628.98
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
05/18/98
$28.13
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
05/18/98
$110.04
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
05/18/98
$79.40
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
051898
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
< *>
$16,790.17*
189097
05/18/98
$29.90
Minnesota Casters Inc
ACCESSORIES
011206
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 3533
05/18/98
$25.97
Minnesota Casters Inc
Shop
011209
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 3532
< *>
$55.87*
COUNCIL
C ; REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 21
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189098
65/18/98
$418.94
MINNESOTA CERAMIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
214028
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
3440
< *>
$418.94*
189099
05/18/98
$113.00
MINNESOTA CLAY USA
CRAFT SUPPLIES
35480
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
05/18/98
$226.00
MINNESOTA CLAY USA
REPAIR PARTS
35480
ART CENTER BLD
REPAIR PARTS
05/18/98
$96.00
MINNESOTA CLAY USA
COST OF GOODS SOLD
35480
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
2292
< *>
$435.00*
189100
05/18/98
$73.15
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
040358
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$73.15*
189101
05/18/98
$124.00
MINNESOTA GLOVE INC
BOOTS
018483
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
3310
< *>
$124.00*
189102
05/18/98
$90.00
MINNESOTA RECREATION & P
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
P225
ED ADMINISTRAT
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$90.00*
189103
05/18/98
$163.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO
REHAB AD
105381
COMMUNICATIONS
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$163.00*
189104
05/18/98
$7.46
Minnesota Vikings Food S
MEETING EXPENSE
1610229
I -494 COMMISSI
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$7.46*
189105
05/18/98
$73.95
Mitchell /Repair Informat
Shop
51.18288
= EQUIPMENT OPER
DATA PROCESSIN
3836
< *>
$73.95*
189106
05/18/98
$50.00
MOIR, BILL
Swimming refund
050198
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
.
< *>
$50.00*
189107
05/18/98
$108.87
MOORE MEDICAL
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
9719580
GOLF ADMINISTR
SAFETY EQUIPME
3601
< *>
$108.87*
189108
05/18/98
$273.00
MDSE, WILLIAM
OFFICIAL
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$273.00*
189109
O5/1.8/98
$109.87
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
I212098
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3627
05/18/98
$48.38
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
I212417
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3627
05/18/98
$9.74
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Irrigation repair par
I212424
FIELD MAINTENA
REPAIR PARTS
3558
05/18/98
$214.60
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
CONTROLLER
I212687
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
3627
05/18/98
$395.88
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
ROLLERS
I212776
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3219
05/18/98
$72.40
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
REPAIR PARTS
I213631
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
3627
05/18/98
$518.61
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Irrigation Parts
I213634
MAINT OF COURS
IRRIGATION EQU
3689
05/18/98
$8.31
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
PLUGS
I214214
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3627
05/18/98
$185.10
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Irrigation
I241294
RICHARDS MAINT
IRRIGATION EQU
3698
05/18/98
$102.64
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Irrigation
I215401
RICHARDS MAINT
IRRIGATION EQU
3761
05/18/98
$47.61
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
PLUGGER
I216886
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3627
< *>
$1,713.14*
189110
05/18/98
$96.89
MURPHY, SYDNEY
SKATING INST. ED
050798
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$96.89*
189111
05/18/98
$450.00
N.R.P.A.
Membership
042898
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$450.00*
189112
05/18/98
$852.48
NAME BRAND SPORTS
Tee shirts
9303
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
3354
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998 (19:00)
page 22
CHECK NO
---------=--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE,
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$852.48*
189113
05/18/98
$59.60
Napa Auto Parts
Shop
477984
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2106
05/18/98
$33.54
Napa Auto Parts
Shop
488606
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2106
05/18/98
$53.24
Napa Auto Parts
shop
400055
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2106
05/18/98
$53.24
Napa Auto Parts
Shop
489208
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2908
05/18/98
$13.41
Napa Auto Parts
Shop
492050
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
2908
< *>
$213.03*
189114
05/18/98
$139.92
National Camera Exchange
CRAFT SUPPLIES
7024476
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
3441
< *>
$139.92*
189115
05/18/98
$374.57
NESS, ANGIE
WINDSHIELD REPLACEMEN
051198
FRED RICHARDS
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$374.57*
189116
05/18/98
$77.07
NICHOLS NET & TWINE INC
Misc supplies
7440
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3588
< *>
$77.07*
189117
05/18/98
$100.00
NISSEN, DICK
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189118
05/18/98
$500.00
Noel Painting
Exterior painting
042798.
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
3785
< *>
$500.00*
'
189119
05/18/98
$252.41
NORTH STAR CONCRETE COMP
CONE DRAIN
93964 -01
GOLF FROG
BUILDINGS
3758
< *>
$252.41*
189120
05/18/98
$133..20
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
91319
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$27.90
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
42217
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$37.20
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
92216
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$31.56
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93837
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$86.18
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93880
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$18.60
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93086
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$68.70
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93090
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$184.76
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
94705
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$588.10*
189121
05/18/98
$599.86
NORTH STAR TURF
Grass seed
167090
FIELD MAINTENA
SEED
3382
05/18/98
$352.75
NORTH STAR TURF
SHOP
167734
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3520
05/18/98
$567.32
NORTH STAR TURF
FERTILIZER
169030
FIELD MAINTENA
FERTILIZER
3390
< *>
$1,519.93*
189122
05/18/98
$167.01
NORTHERN
Trailer
82254500
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3356
05/18/98
$138.44
NORTHERN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3266759
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3875
05/18/98
$68.12
NORTHERN
318 SUPPLIES
19267054
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
3885
< *>
$373.57*
189123
05/18/98
$173.01
Northland Chemical Corp
Cleaning supplies
35386
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3578
< *>
$173.01*
189124
05/18/98
$12.43
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
45754
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3110
05/18/98
$813.13
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
45895
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
3110
05/18/98
$201.07
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -45527
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
3110
05/18/98
$703.78
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
"NW -45973
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
3110
05/18/98
$215.36
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
NW -45978
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
3110
COUNCIL
C1- REGISTER
837436
CITY HALL GENE
14-
-1998 (19:00)
COST
OF -GOODS SOLD
1256907
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
page 23
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
GRILL
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------=---=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189124
05/18/98
$118.90
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
SHOP TIRES
NW -46124
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
3883
< *>
$2,064.67*
189127
05/18/98
$3.14
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
GENERAL MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$98.56
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$20.90
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$5,450.80
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$378.70
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$510.80
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98,
$132.40
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
YORK FIRE STAT
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98,
$11.94
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$1,886.73
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$2,249.35
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
PW BUILDING
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$1,956.01
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$2,352.99
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98,
$296.60
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98'
$358.96
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
FRED RICHARDS
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98'
$962.92
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
GOLF DOME.
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98,
$13.83
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$9,965.46
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$852.85
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
ART CENTER BLD
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$8,016.31
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
POOL TRACK GRE
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$311.60
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98;
$1,077.22
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
%PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&,
POWER
05/18/98
$817.54
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$769.76
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$1,149.01
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98'
$624.52
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98
$20.75
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT
&
POWER
05/18/98;
$144.03
NSP
LIGHT
& POWER
051898
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
&
POWER
< *>
$40,433.68*
189128
05/18/98
$11.80
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I Trailer
supplies
78131
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3606
05/18/98
$93.29
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I GENERAL
SUPPLIES
78286
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3671
05/18/98
$147.26
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I TRAILER
TIEDOWNS
78647
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3606
05/18/98
$97.09
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I REPAIR
PARTS
78684
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR
PARTS
3764
05/18/98
$108.63
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I REPAIR
PARTS
78808
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
3765
05/18/98
$59.50
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I REPAIR
PARTS
78930
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
3764
OS/18/98
$379.14
Olsen
Chain & Cable Co
I TOOL BOX
79506
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
3963
< *>
$896.71*
189129
05/18/98
$446.66
OLWIN,
ROGER
UNIFORM
ALLOWANCE
042898
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$446.66*
189130 05/18/98
05/18/98
< *>
189131 05/18/98
189132 05/18/98
05/18/98
$873.97 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPUTER
$1,747.96 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPUTERS
$2,621.93*
$59.64 ORKIN EXTERMINATING
$59.64*
$81.50 Otis Spunkmeyer -Inc
$79.00 Otis Spunkmeyer Inc
$160.50*
345133 INSPECTIONS EQUIP REPLACEM 3602
345133 GENERAL(BILLIN EQUIP REPLACEM 3602
Pest
control
837436
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
3822
COST
OF -GOODS SOLD
1256907
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
1397
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
1257586
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
1397
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
Printing
14 -VitiY -1998 (19:00)
540902
'I -494 COMMISSI
page.24
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
---------=-=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189133
05/18/98
$121:87
OWENS SERVICE CO
McQUAY DIAGNOSIS
30962
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
SOL
$121.87*
COMPANY
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
54924849
189134
05/18/98
$407.04
Paging Network of Minnes
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
064A2000
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
YORK SELLING
$407.04*
MIX
&
SPIRITS
$1,204.45
PHILLIPS
189135
05/18/98
$143.17
Paper Depot
CRAFT SUPPLIES _
8974
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
< *>
PHILLIPS
$143.17*
&
SPIRITS
$51.15
PHILLIPS
WINE
189136
05/18/98
$191.65
Pappas, Harry
Defective clubs
042198
GOLF PROG
PRO SHOP SALES
< *>
$191.65*
189137
05/18/98
$207.95
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
RTW EXAM
050298
GENERAL MAINT
PHYS EXAMS .
05/18/98
$39.30
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
HEP B
050298
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$25.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
RANDOM DOT
050298
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
< *>
$272.25*
189138 05/18/98
189139 05/18/98
189140 05/18/98
< *>
189141 05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
189142 05/18/98
189143 05/18/98
189144 05/18/98
< *>
189146
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
$3.30 Park Seed
$3.30*
$1,890.39
$1,890.39*
$416.25
$416.25*
$93.45
$1,647.87
$97.00
$174.90
$2,013.22*
$190.42
$190.42*
$880.00
$880.00*
PARTS PLUS
FLOWER SEEDS 80428183 GENERAL TURF C SEED 3737
REPAIR PARTS 042698
EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS
PBS Graphic
Art & Design
Printing
&
540902
'I -494 COMMISSI
MEETING EXPENS
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
55899551
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS
MIX
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
STATEMEN
GRILL
COST OF GD
SOL
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
54924849
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD
SOL
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
55899679
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS
MIX
PERFORMANCE_COMPUTER FOR.GENERAL SUPPLIES 008728
PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 23.35
$9,400.50 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 050998
$9,400.50*
$68.49
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$377.35
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$1,653.65
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
- $77.30
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
- $24.55
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$126.65
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$674.65
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$39.05
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$237.40
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$1,204.45
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$1,219.60
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$2,907.98
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$51.15
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
$848.65
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
374825
382810
382811
3175044
3175045
384897
384898
384899
384900
384901
384902
384903
384904
384905
POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3426
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 3714
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH•ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
COUNCIL
C REGISTER
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING 3768
14
1322
-1998
(19:00)
CONFERENCES &
SCHOOLS 042898
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
page 25
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
COMPANY
VENDOR
OF
DESCRIPTION
SOLD
INVOICE
PROGRAM
50T11 ST SELLIN
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189146
05/18/98
$1,963.55
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
384906
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
GDS
05/18/98
$14.38
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
386962
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
WINE
05/18/98
$372.58
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
386963
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
PRIOR
05/18/98
$1,021.05
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
386966
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
WINE
05/18/98
$1,684.22
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
386967
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINS
COMPANY
05/18/98
$250.33
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
386968
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
< *>
$14,613.33*
189147
05/18/98
$68.00
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
- PRO S
970757
PRO SHOP
COST OF
GDS -PR 1756
05/18/98
$498.94
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
990998
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$326.23
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
9910320
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$479.75
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991064
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$217.50
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991088
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$652.46
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991133
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$364.61
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991165
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$422.18
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991186
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$111.20
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991219
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
05/18/98
$169.00
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
991220
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$3,309.87*
189148
05/18/98
- $61:01
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
REPAIR
PARTS
850324
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
05/18/98
$123.60
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
SHOP
1- 924038
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 3748
< *>
$62.59*
189149 05/18/98
189150 05/18/98
189151 05/18/98
189152 05/18/98
189153 05/18/98
189154 05/18/98
189155 05/18/98
05/16/98
05/18/98
18915'7
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
$325.39 PIP PRINTING
$325.39*
$76.86 Pirtek Plymouth
$76.86*
$300.00 POLICE INSTITUTE
$300.00*
$15.00
$15.00*
$300.00
$300.00*
$479.25
$479.25*
$742.09
$1,038.38
$623.03
$2,403.50*
$241.82
;'342.85
$79.28
$513.40
$111.30
$532.30
$266.20
$453.53
Porthan, Todd
POSTMASTER
PRINTING
6785
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING 3768
REPAIR PARTS
1322
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS 3926.
CONFERENCES &
SCHOOLS 042898
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
Reimbursement
042998
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
POSTAGE
Precision Tree Company, STUMP REMOVAL
PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA CHEMICALS
PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA FERTILIZER
PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA FERTILIZER
050198 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE
050198 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 3569
11376 MAINT OF COURS CHEMICALS 3766
11400 FIELD MAINTENA FERTILIZER 3726
11401 FIELD MAINTENA FERTILIZER 3894
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
81639
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GUS
MIX
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
01643
50T11 ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
01645
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
01646
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
04596
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
04598
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
04604
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
PRIOR
WINE
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
04605
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998
(19:00)
page 26
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------
189157
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05/18/98
$102.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI
04606
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$77.45
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
04618.
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$1,096.23
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
04619
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$19.95
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI
04620
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
- $14.12
'PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
85988
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$288.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
07833
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$1,339.72
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
07836
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$371.58
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI
07837
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$1,649.59
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
07847
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$224.61
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI
07848
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$7,696.84*
189158
05/18/98
$230.00
PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUB
CONFERENCES &
SCHOOLS
050198
FINANCE
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$230.00*
189159
05/18/98
$375.00
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E
ENG SERV
9801104
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$375.00*
189160
05/18/98
$479.29
QUALITY REFRIGERATION IN
SERVICE CONTRACTS
EQU
116830
CLUB HOUSE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$479.29*
189161
05/18/98
- $59.98
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
LI
599386
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$3,158.20
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
600865
-YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$2,623.78
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
600907
' VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$3,297.76
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
LI
601051
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$3,475.77
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
LI
601053
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
05/18/98
$154.15
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
601113
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
_
$12,649.68*
189162
05/18/98
- $63.89
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
234179
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2968
05/18/98
$61.09
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
234180
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2968
05/18/98
$127.61
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
Radios
235382.
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3355
05/18/98
$95.84
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
Auto dialer
235746.
BUILDINGS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3579
< *>
$220.65*
189163
05/18/98
$273.00
Reamer, Mark
SOFTBALL UMP
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$273.00*
189164
05/18/98
$3,922.48
Recreation Sports & Play
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
0429
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
05/18/98
$3,922.48
Recreation Sports & Play
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
042998
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$7,844.96*
189165
05/18/98
$45.94
Rental Center & Power To
Tools
87120
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
3322
< *>
$45.94*
189166
05/18/98
$49.00
RICHARDS, BARBARA
ART CLASS REFUND
050698
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$49.00*
189167
05/18/98
$250.00
Richfield High School
REFUND DAMAGE
DEPOSIT
050498
EDINB /CL PROG
RENTAL INCOME
< *>
$250.00*
189168
05/18/98
$189.50
RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA
Repair
6281
CLUB HOUSE
CONTR REPAIRS
3812
05/18/98
$118.50
RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA
Greenhouse inspection
6437
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
3895
< *>
$308.00*
COUNCIL
C , REGISTER
14 . -1998 (19:00)
page 27
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189169
05/18/98
$341.58
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
Shop
254264
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3530
< *>
$341.58*
189170
05/18/98
$6.23
Ritz Camera
Film processing
3750148.
SIDEWALK DEWEY
CIP
3502
05/18/98
$6.23
Ritz Camera
Film processing
3750148.
SAN.SEWER
CIP
3502
05/18/98
$17.02
Ritz Camera
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
3751392
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
2370
05/18/98
$8.51
Ritz Camera
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
3751987
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
05/18/98
$20.70
Ritz Camera
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
3752920
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
2370
< *>
$58.69*
189171
05/18/98
$260.00
ROBINSON, JAMES E
TRAINING
042898
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$260.00*
189172
05/18/98
$1,455.00
Roof Masters Inc
ROOF REPAIRS
4980581
POOL TRACK GRE
CONTR REPAIRS
3494
< *>
$1,455.00*
189173
05/18/98
$1,694.42
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO
Vib
00307
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
2845
< *>
$1,694.42*
189174
05/18/98
$175.50
RYDER, ROBERT
SOFTBALL OFF
051198
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$175.50*
189175
05/18/98
$206.76
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMMER
Supplies for open hou
050198
gW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$148.10
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMMER
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
050898
-GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$354.86*
189176
05/18/98
$1,602.00
Sanders Acoustics
ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
86224
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
2810
< *>
$1,602.00*
189177
05/18/98
$910.00
SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B
PROF ENG SERV
9815 -1
TH 62 /FRANCE
CIP
< *>
$910.00*
189178
05/18/98
$263.59
SCHARBER & SONS
Toole for greenhouse
11225418
GENERAL TURF C
TOOLS
3114
05/18/98
$197.28
SCHARBER & SONS
MOWER BELTS
179825
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3463
< *>
$460.87*
189179
05/18/98
$18.00
SCHMIDT, MARK
REFUND GOLF HANDICAP
050698
GOLF PROG
COMPUTR HANDIC
< *>
$18.00*
189180
05/18/98
$25.00
SCHWARTZ, S.A.
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$25.00*
189181
05/18/98
$918.60
SEABOARD PENCIL CO
PENCILS
140002
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
3864
< *>
$918.60*
189182
05/18/98
$284.66
SEARS
Lawn mower
SR759008
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3478
05/18/98
$85.35
SEARS
(land tools
62802681
METER REPAIR
EOUIP MAINT
3564
< *>
$370.01*
189183
05/18/98
$75.00
SECURITY LINK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
24942288
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR EQUI
4053
05/18/98
$75.00
SECURITY LINK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
24997688
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$150.00*
189184
05/18/98
$55.40
SEELYE PLASTICS
PVC parts
491044
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
3571
< *>
$55.40*
COUNCIL
CHECm REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998 (19:00)
page 28
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------
189185
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05/18/98
$6,988.84
SEH
PROF ENG SERV
46880
TH100 & W 77TH
CIP
< *>
$6,988.84*
189186
05/18/98
$949.49
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$949.49
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$949.49
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$949.50
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$949.50
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$949.49.
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$949.49
SGN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1039
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$6,646.45*
189187
05/18/98
$100.00
SHEPARD, JOHN
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189188
05/18/98
$313.49
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
26152
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PAINT
3631
05/18/98
$228.41
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27812
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3672
05/18/98
$120.56
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
2489 -3
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$62.84
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT, ROLLERS
3039 -4
BRIDGES GUARD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3744
< *>
$725.30*
189189
05/18/98_
$131.14
SIGNAL SYSTEM
REPAIRS
64468
GOLF ADMINISTR
SVC CONTR EQUI
3868
< *>
$131.14*
189190
05/18/98
$29.35
SIITARI, MICHAEL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
05/18/98
$193.80
SIITARI, MICHAEL
SPRING CONF
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$223.15*
189191
05/18/98
$121.50
SIMS SECURITY
4/24 4/25
8608887
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$121.50*
189192
05/18/98
$381.80
SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK
Sigh shop
648270
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3340
< *>
$381.80*
189193
05/18/98
$210.00
Skyway Rental
Chair rental the ball
970357
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$210.00*
189194
05/18/98
$45.00
SMIEJA, GARY
Machine staff
050598
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$45.00*
189195
05/18/98
$247.50
Smith of Galeton Gloves
Gloves
270988
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
3575
< *>
$247.50*
189196
05/18/98
$191.17
SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEM
Survey supplies
8010014R
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3688
05/18/98
$99.58
SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEM
SURVEY TAPE
8010143
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3794
< *>
$290.75*
18919.7
05/18/98
$35.10
SOUTHSIDE DISTRImj -roRS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
83241
FREI) RICHARDS
CST OF GDS BEE
1396
05/18/98
$679.55
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
83306
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$23.50
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
83307
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$79.80
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
83308
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$2,772.90
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
83311
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$47.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
83312
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
05/18/98
$219.30
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
5/1 STMT
FRED RICHARDS
CST OF GDS BEE
1396
05/18/98
$21.45
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
83555
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
COUNCIL
C. REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 29
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-----------
'--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189197
05/18/98
$3,323.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
83556
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$72.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
83557
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$7,274.30*
189198
05/18/98
$128.52
SPALDING
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
50851403
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9484
< *>
$128.52*
189199
05/18/98
$62.10
SPS
REPAIR PARTS
2899916
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
3323
05/18/98
$13.38
SPS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2903444
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
05/18/98
$24.63
SPS
Piping supplies
2909088
WATER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3661
05/18/98
$114.27
SPS
ELEC SUPPLIES
2917220
50TH ST OCCUPA
REPAIR PARTS
3879
05/18/98
$403.02
SPS
AC ELEC
2917221
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3880
< *>
$617.40*
189200
05/18/98
$641.66
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
400997
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
2791
< *>
$641.66*
189201
05/18/98
$2,645.25
STAR TRIBUNE
Help wanted ads
043098
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
05/18/98
$150.00
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING OTHER
043098
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
05/18/98
$75.00
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING OTHER
043098
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
05/18/98
$75.00
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING OTHER
043098
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$2,945.25*
189202
05/18/98
$40.00
STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICI
Permit fees
043098
-ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$40.00*
189203
05/18/98
$21.30
Street, Bruce
Shop
14706
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2325
< *>
$21.30*
189204
05/18/98
$479.20
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
IN.52068
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
4058
05/18/98
$190.64
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
IN.49653
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
4059
< *>
$669.84*
189205
05/18/98
$255.00
STROH ENGINEERING
Prof sery
98229
50TH ST OCCUPA
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$255.00*
189206
05/18/98
$15.00
STRUZYK, JOSEPH
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
042298
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$15.00*
189207
05/18/98
$11.24
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
233641
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3511
05/18/98
$4.69
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
235381
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3512
< *>
$15.93*
189208
05/18/98
$560.58
SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC.
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
488924
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
8829
< *>
$560.58*
189209
05/18/98
$598.00
Sundance Commodities & D
MULCH
00012650
CENTENNIAL LAK
FERTILIZER
3687
< *>
$598.00*
189210
05/18/98
$67.85
SuperAmerica
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
< *>
$67.85*
189211
05/18/98
$302.28
Susan Frame Design
COST OF GOODS SOLD
041998
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
3281
< *>
$302.28*
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
WELDING SUPPLI
14 -MAY -1998 (19:00)
172371
05/18/98
GENERAL SUPPLI
page 30
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
---------'-=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189212
05/18/98
$100.00
SWANSON, HAROLD
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
05/18/98
< *>
$100.00*
05/18/98
EQUIP MAINT
577005
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
189213
05/18/98
$46.97
Symons Corporation
Salt storage
63C10719
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3506
< *>
$46.97*
189214
05/18/98
$66.03
Tape Distributors of
Min GENERAL SUPPLIES
88601
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3424
05/18/98
$22.26
Tape Distributors of
Min GENERAL SUPPLIES
88774
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3425
< *>
$88.29*
189215
05/18/98
$21.41
TARGET STORES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34539
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$21.41*
189216
05/18/98
$236.69
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
Shop stock
5618901
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3171
< *>
$236.69*
189217
05/18/98
$528.77
TERRY ANN SALES CO
Water cups
2246
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLI
5277
< *>
$528.77*
189218 05/18/98
189219
05/18/98
WELDING SUPPLI
05/18/98
172371
05/18/98
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
172841
05/18/98
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
172842
05/18/98
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
172843
05/18/98
GENERAL SUPPLI
3461
189220
05/18/98
TOOLS
3762
189221
05/18/98
DUES & SUBSCRI
189222
05/18/98
EQUIP MAINT
189223 05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
05/18/98
$11,774.95
$11,774.95*
$288.00
$47.50
$95.75
$400.00
$3,574.40
$103.50.
$2,049.65
$88.55
-$6.00
$6,641.35*
$70.00
$70.00*
$8,491.31
$8,491..31*
$22.67
$22.67*
$107.62
$32.57
$51.29
$1.04
$1.04
$30.48
$218.33
$7.56
$5.94
$455.87*
THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTING 121797 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 130915 _GRILL CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD 130916 GRILL COST OF GD SOL
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131491 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE- 131538 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131652 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131653 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132190 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132191 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132190CR VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
Tiletech by J.R. Inc Repair
TKDA Engineers Architect PROF•ENG SERV
TODD, DARRELL POSTAGE
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Shop
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Sign shop
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Sign shop
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Sign shop
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Sign shop
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding Supplies
TOLL GAS & WELDING,SUPPL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL ACETYLENE
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES
1278 CLUB HOUSE CONTR REPAIRS 3594
040093 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF.SERVICES
050898 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE
171859
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
3504
172371
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3461
172841
' GENERAL.MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
3461
172842
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3461
172843
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
3461
174230
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
3762
174503
ARENA ADMINIST
DUES & SUBSCRI
577004
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
577005
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
189224 05/18/98 $2;303.20 Tommy Hilfiger Golf COST OF GOODS - PROS 586671 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8828
< *> $2,303:20*
COUNCIL
C REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 31
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
----------7-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189225
05/18/98
$1,200.00
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
Annual contract
5722
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DATA PROCESSIN
05/18/98
$1,800.00
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
Annual contract
5722
LIQUOR YORK GE
DATA PROCESSIN
05/18/98
$1,500.00
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
Annual contract
5722
VERNON LIQUOR
DATA PROCESSIN
< *>
$4,500.00*
189226
05/18/98
$573.64
TRACY /TRIPP FUELS
GASOLINE
47479
MAINT OF COURS
GASOLINE
2812
< *>
$573.64*
189227
05/18/98
$55.11
TRANSPORT TRUCK CENTER
Repairs
E8096031
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3170
05/18/98
$401.51
TRANSPORT TRUCK CENTER
Shop
E8099007
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3170
< *>
$456.62*
189228
05/18/98
$361.26
TRIGG INDUSTRIES INTL IN
Traffic counter suppl
11125
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
3790
< *>
$361.26*
189229
05/18/98
$1,180.56
TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN - MINNET
WEED CONTROL
SPRING
GENERAL TURF C
WEED SPRAY
3093
< *>
$1,180.56*
189230
05/18/98
$393.75
Twin Cities Service Cent
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
217052
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
1251
< *>
$393.75*
189231
05/18/98
$63.90
TWIN CITIES WRECKER SALE
Shop
125366
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3528
< *>
$63.90*
189232
05/18/98
$242.46
TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODU
CEMENT
118881
.PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
3293
< *>
$242.46*
189233
05/18/98
$49.00
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
OXYGEN
420599
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
05/18/98
$28.80
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
OXYGEN APRIL
421759
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
1111
< *>
$77.80*
189234
05/18/98
$253.47
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
Grass seed
110
FIELD MAINTENA
SEED
3387
05/18/98
$495.23
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
Seed
151
MAINT OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
3411
05/18/98
$511.20
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
PLANTINGS & TREES
245
MAINT OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
3767
05/18/98
$143.78
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
SEED
254
GENERAL TURF C
SEED
3898
05/18/98
$391.39
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
FERTILIZER
272
FIELD MAINTENA
FERTILIZER
3946
< *>
$1,795.07*
189235
05/18/98
$823.65
U.S. Filter /Waterpro
Water main parts
409597
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
3656
05/18/98
$525.00
U.S. Filter /Waterpro
DRAINAGE PIPE
411714
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
3696
< *>
$1,348.65*
189236
05/18/98
$785.19
U.S. Premise Networking
Wiring
6442
GOLF ADMINISTR
SVC CONTR EQUI
3819
< *>
$785.19*
189237
05/18/98
$319.79
UNIMED MIDWEST INC.
AMB SUPPLIES
0006852
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3615
< *>
$319.79*
189238
05/18/98
$4,191.12
UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS
FERTILIZER
0021547
CENTENNIAL LAK
FERTILIZER
3342
05/18/98
$346.13
UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0022159
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
3395
< *>
$4,537.25*
189239
05/18/98
$398.12
United Electric
GENERAL SUPPLIES
35411200
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
3733
< *>
$398.12*
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -hiriY -1998 (19:00)
page 32
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------
189240
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05/18/98
$57.61
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
DARE
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$1,798.13
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$59.21
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$874.78
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$85.80
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$350.87
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$259.12
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$312.56
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
05/18/98
$60.39
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
051898
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
< *>
$3,858.47*
189241
05/18/98
$6.20
US West Dex
US West Listing
00410184
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
< *>
$6.20*
189242
05/18/98
$48.00
VALLIERE, JOHN
PRO SHOP BLINDS
87050
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$48.00*
189243
05/18/98
$552.25
VAN O LITE INC
Elec Braemar Golf
146249
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
3559
< *>
$552.25*
189244
05/18/98
$397.94
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
212669
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
3699
05/18/98
$99.05
VAN PAPER CO.
Plates
213448
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
3699
05/18/98
$650.27
VAN PAPER CO.
CLEANING SUPPLIES
214508
:CLUB HOUSE
CLEANING SUPPL
1400
< *>
$1,147.26*
189245
05/18/98
$434.45
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
ELEC REPAIRS
14972
POOL TRACK GRE
CONTR REPAIRS
3799
< *>
$434.45*
189246
05/18/98
$66.89
VESSCO
Chlorinator fittings
16189
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
3739
< *>
$66.89*
189247
05/18/98
$203.42
VIKING ELECTRIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3626937
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
3830
< *>
$203.42*
].897.411
OS /].11 /9n
$86.86
Viking Inditntrial Center
WORK GLOVES
7.6575
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
3624
<t>
$86.86*
189249
05/18/98
$88.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
2427
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$103.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
2431
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$191.00*
189250
05/18/98
$72.59
Voss Lighting
GENERAL SUPPLIES
20110340
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1674
< *>
$72.59*
189251
05/18/98
$440.00
W.M. Montgomery & Associ
CELLULAR CONSULTING
050398
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$440.00*
189252
05/18/98
$823.03
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP
Wear ring
47638
LIFT STATION M
REPAIR PARTS
3725
< *>
$823.03*
189253
05/18/98
$100.00
WALSH, WILLIAM
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189254
05/18/98
$224.00
WATERSTREET, JOAN M
HTE CONFERENCE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$224.00*
COUNCIL
C. REGISTER
14 -1998 (19:00)
page 33
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189255
05/18/98
$8.58
WATERSTREET, JOAN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$272.19
WATERSTREET, JOAN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
05/18/98
$27.94
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MEETING EXPENSE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPENS
05/18/98
$11.25
WATERSTREET, JOAN
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
05/18/98
$35.56
WATERSTREET, JOAN
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
05/18/98
$24.71
WATERSTREET, JOAN
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
05/18/98
$67.52
WATERSTREET, JOAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
05/18/98
$13.43
WATERSTREET, JOAN
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
PHOTO SUPPLIES
05/18/98
$8.50
WATERSTREET, JOAN
OFFICE SUPPLIES
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
05/18/98
$16.12
WATERSTREET, JOAN
PRISONER MEALS
051198
POLICE DEPT. G
PRISONER MEALS
05/18/98
$40.43
WATERSTREET, JOAN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
051198
RESERVE PROGRA
CONF & SCHOOLS
05/18/98
$7.61
WATERSTREET, JOAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
051198
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$533.84*
189256
05/18/98
$70.00
WELNA, SUSAN
REFUND TENNIS CLASS
050798
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$70.00*
189257
05/18/98
$637.34
Welsh Companies Inc
JUNE CAM CHARGES
060198
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF SERVICES
05/18/98
$2,531.75
Welsh Companies Inc
1997 CAM AUDIT
424 -6755
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF - SERVICES
< *>
$3,169.09*
189258
05/18/98
$517.53
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Stock
14545
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
3641
05/18/98
$103.54
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Stock supplies
14685
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3746
< *>
$621.07*
189259
05/18/98
$2,100.00
WESTSIDR EOIITPMENT
Hoint rep
62090
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOTS
1.679
< *>
$2,100.00*
189260
05/18/98
$139.21
WILLIAMS STEEL
Paint stock
79135801
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
3728
< *>
$139.21*
189261
05/18/98
$375.58
WILSON SPORTING GOODS
CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S
1756472
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9480
05/18/98
$1,548.00
WILSON SPORTING GOODS
CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S
1761220
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9480
< *>
$1,923.58*
189262
05/18/98
$480.16
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
4456
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$69.23
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
4564
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/981
$513.44
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
4790
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98,
$34.95
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
4791
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
05/18/98
$985.06
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
4792
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$564.39
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
4793
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
-$7.33
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
4869
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
05/18/98
$472.75
WINE COMPANY, -THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
5085
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$3,112.65*
189263
05/18/98,
$398.20
WINE MERCHANTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
10301
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$398.20*
189264
05/18/98;
$494.55
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
BALLS
75358
RANGE
RANGE BALLS
3599
05/18/98'
$88.49
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
BUCKETS
75820
RANGE
RANGE BALLS
3599
< *>
$583.04*
189265
05/18/98
$800.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
Park bond work
9807
PK BOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
3896
< *>
$800.00*
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
14 -MAY -1998 (19:00)
page 34
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
189266
05/18/98
$437.57
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
70934
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF.GD
WINE
05/18/98
$193.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
71151
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$445.90
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
71155
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$260.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
71168
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD WINE
05/18/98
$135.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
71272
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
$2,301.75
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
71354
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GD WINE
< *>
.05/18/98
$3,773.22*
189267
05/18/98
$100.00
WROBLESKI, HENRY
Police service
MAY 1998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR
SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
189268
05/18/98
$1,208.48
XEROX CORPORATION
Maint charge
62246159
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP
RENTAL
< *>
$1,208.48*
189269
05/18/98
$6,770.21
Zahl Equipment Co
Gas eq
70944
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
9718
< *>
$6,770.21*
189270
05/18/98
$19.38
Zellerbach
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1388540-
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE
SUPPLIE
3199
< *>
$19.38*
189271
05/18/98
$1,049.09
ZIEGLER INC
Goodin repairs
12264
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR
REPAIRS
3189
05/18/98
$183.14
ZIEGLER INC
SEALS, 0 RINGS
PC000122
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
3899
< *>
$1,232.23*
'
$1,101,647.07*
COUNCIL K SUMMARY 1• f -1998 (19:02) page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $178,197.91
FUND # it COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $11,330.00
FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $18,284.34
FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $14,864.80
FUND # 23 ART CENTER $7,301.27
FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $6,297.06
FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $4,373.79
FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $57,177.55
FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $21,293.66
FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $25,967.36
FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $416,588.11
FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $164.78
FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $34,101.17
FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $209,081.80
FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $70,819.84
FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $25,379.92
FUND # 73 I -494 COMMISSION $423.71
$1,101,647.07*
188004 04/06/98
188005 04/06/98
04/06/98
188006 04/06/98
1.88007 04/06/98
188008 04/06/98
188009 04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
188010 04/06/98
04/06/98
188011 04/13/98
04/13/98
188012 04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
$151.20 ASCAP
$151.20*
$9.35
$3.71
$13.06*
$7,011.72
$7,011.72*
$63,667.44
$63,667.44*
$46.74
$46.74*
- $32.00
$14.01
- $162.70
- $16.84
$1,123.00
$1,303.53
$4,175.62
$1,905.87
$282.50
-$8.06
$8,584.93*
$92.66
$370.62
$463.28*
$13.01
$43.20
$56.21*
$787.11
$1,425.49
$205.52
$4,599.23
$1,556.71
$202.56
$2,103.26
$154.89
License music perform 0206
ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL Sales tax 40536540 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP 2196
J.H. L.ARSON ELECTRICAL Sales tax 40535460 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP
LJR INC I494 consultant fees 1494/37 I -494 COMMISSI PROF SERVICES
PERA
PERA
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
ROBERT B. HILL
ROBERT B. HILL
LATHAM, PATTY L
LATHAM, PATTY L
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
PERA 040698
PERA 040698
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 587496
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 587497
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 587678
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 587706
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590166
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590186
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 590633
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 590634
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590932
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 591259
GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB
GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES 00033756 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLIES 00033757 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
WIN NT TRAINING 033098
MEETING EXPENSE 033098
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590167
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 590632
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590933
COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 592407
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592408
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592409
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592417
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592511
CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS
CENT SVC GENER MFETTNG EXPENS
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD.WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
CE,__., REGISTER
08- i•.—f -1998 (18:49)
1
page
CHECK NO
-- - - - - --
CHECK DT
--------------------------------------------------Y----------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
184367
04/03/98
$314,000.00
CITY
OF
EDINA
Payroll
transfer
040398
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
04/03/98
- $314,000.00
CITY
OF
EDINA
Payroll
transfer
040398
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
184368
04/15/98
$2,623.20
POSTMASTER
Postage
hydrant flush
041598
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$2,623.20*
184369
04/17/98
$208,000.00
CITY
OF
EDINA
Payroll
transfer
041798
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
04/17/98
- $208,000.00
CITY
OF
EDINA
Payroll
transfer
041798
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
188004 04/06/98
188005 04/06/98
04/06/98
188006 04/06/98
1.88007 04/06/98
188008 04/06/98
188009 04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
04/06/98
188010 04/06/98
04/06/98
188011 04/13/98
04/13/98
188012 04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
04/13/98
$151.20 ASCAP
$151.20*
$9.35
$3.71
$13.06*
$7,011.72
$7,011.72*
$63,667.44
$63,667.44*
$46.74
$46.74*
- $32.00
$14.01
- $162.70
- $16.84
$1,123.00
$1,303.53
$4,175.62
$1,905.87
$282.50
-$8.06
$8,584.93*
$92.66
$370.62
$463.28*
$13.01
$43.20
$56.21*
$787.11
$1,425.49
$205.52
$4,599.23
$1,556.71
$202.56
$2,103.26
$154.89
License music perform 0206
ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL Sales tax 40536540 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP 2196
J.H. L.ARSON ELECTRICAL Sales tax 40535460 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP
LJR INC I494 consultant fees 1494/37 I -494 COMMISSI PROF SERVICES
PERA
PERA
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
ROBERT B. HILL
ROBERT B. HILL
LATHAM, PATTY L
LATHAM, PATTY L
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
PERA 040698
PERA 040698
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 587496
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 587497
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 587678
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 587706
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590166
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590186
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 590633
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 590634
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590932
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 591259
GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB
GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES 00033756 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLIES 00033757 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
WIN NT TRAINING 033098
MEETING EXPENSE 033098
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590167
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 590632
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590933
COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 592407
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592408
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592409
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592417
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 592511
CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS
CENT SVC GENER MFETTNG EXPENS
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD.WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
CHEC., REGISTER
08 -v..yY -1998 (18:49)
page 2
CHECK NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
188012
04/13/98
$2,448.25
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
592826
- VERNON SELLING
CST
"I' GD LIQU
04/13/98
$1,005.36
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
592838
50TH ST SELLIN
r,,
GD LIQU
04/13/98
$4,538.34
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
592839
YORK SELLING
1'
OF GD LIQU
< *>
$19,026.72*
188013
04/13/98
$400.00
VALLIERE,
JOHN
GOFL
COURSE CHANGE
FU
040698
GOLF PROG
!,a4GE
FUND
< *>
$400.00*
188382
04/20/98
$5,238.25
A.U.S.
Communications
NW wiring
2336
CENT SVC GENER
NEW
EQUIP
2314
04/20/98
$500.45
A.U.S.
Communications
NW wiring
2337
CENT SVC GENER
NEW
EQUIP
2314
< *>
$5,738.70*
188383
04/20/98
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J
Medical
service
042098
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
188384
04/20/98
$86.31
Ferrellgas
General
supplies
036526.
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9926
< *>
$86.31*
188385
04/20/98
$46.74
PERA
PERA
042098
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$46.74*
188386
04/20/98
$66,027.37
PERA
PERA
042098
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A.
PAYAB
< *>
$66,027.37*
188387
04/20/98
$314.40
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
591713
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/20/98
$228.40
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
592964
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/20/98
$1,809:41
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
594252
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/20/98
04/20/98
$1,338.32
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
594282
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
04/20/98
$1,848.20
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
594283
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/20/98
$1,466.75
$3,839.29
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
594606
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
04/20/98
$1,493.84
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
COST
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
594607
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
< *>
$12,338.61*
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
594608
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD LIQU
188388
04/27/98
$1,050.00
Noel Painting
DOWN
PAYMENT EXTERIOR
2726
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
2726
< *>
$1,050.00*
188389
04/27/98
$314.24
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
591712
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD WINE
04/27/98
04/27/98
- $56.70
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
594296
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/27/98
- $12.82
$2,454.32
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
594318
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/27/98
$4,895.97
QUALITY
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
596553
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/27/98
$2,146.95
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
596554
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD WINE
04/27/98
$3,751.74
QUALITY
WINE
COST
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
596635
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
< *>
$13,493.70*
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
596653
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD LIQU
188836
05/04/98
$881.81
3M CO
Shop
supplies
Past
d
042498
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS
k POSTS
< *>
$881.81*
18883.7
*>
05/04/98
$7,071.16
LJR INC
Consult
fee
050298
I -494 COMMISSI
PROF
SERVICES
<
$7,071.16*
188838
05/04/98
$46.74
PERA
PERA
050498
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A.
PAYAB
< *>
$46.74*
r
,'OUNCII,
ChrCK REGISTER
08 -MAY -1998 (18:49)
page 3
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
188839
05/04/98
$65,754.68
PERA
PERA
050498
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A.
PAYAB
< *>
$65,754.68*
188841
05/04/98
-$8.51
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
595243
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
05/04/98
- $39.72
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
596338
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
$1,972.86
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
596602
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
$2,019.39
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
596652
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
05/04/98
- $143.66
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
597346
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
- $343.70
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
597511
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
05/04/98
- $61.20
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
597725
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
$1,565.71
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
598746
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
05/04/98
$5,947.99
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
598747
YORK
SELLING
CST.OF
GD
LIQU
05/04/98
$3,213.35
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
598749
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
05/04/98
$2,842.76
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
598772
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
$2,732.56
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
598775
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
$2,818.52
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
598784
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
05/04/98
$138.90
QUALITY
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
598784CO
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS BEE
< *>
$22,655.25*
$298,622.24*
CO[JNCT1.
CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS
08- MAY - 1998.(18:50)
page• 1
------------------------------------------------
FUND.
#.
10
GENERAL FUND
-------------------
$203,653.10
FUND
It
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$1, 063.06
FUND
11
23
ART CENTER
$86.31
FUND
If
27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$400.00
FUND
It
28
ICE ARENA FUND
$463.28
FUND
If
30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK
$151.20 -
. FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$2,623:20
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$76,099.21
FUND
#
73
I -494 COMMISSION
$14,082..88
$298,622.24*