Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-10-06 City Council Meeting PacketAgenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Thursday, October 6, 2022 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearings Call 786-496-5601 Enter Conference Pin 2913231 Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak An operator will introduce you when it is your turn I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Sept. 20, 2022 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Ordinance No. 2022-08 & Resolution No. 2022-92 Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan, & Site Improvement Plan Agreement for Solhem Companies at 4600 and 4620 77th Street West D.Approve First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk for Cahill Area District Plan E.Approve Amendment to Public Health Software Agreement F.Ordinance No. 2022-14: Amending Chapter 2 of the City Code Setting License Fee for THC-Infused Edibles and Drinks G.Ordinance No. 2022-15: Amending City Code Chapter 12 Regarding Tobacco Compliance Penalties H.Ordinance No 2022-16: Repealing Ordinance 2022-06 an Interim Ordinance Prohibiting the Sale, Testing, Manufacturing, and Distribution of THC Products I.Approve Ordinance No. 2022-10: Amending Chapters 10 and 24 Concerning Residential Tree Protection J.Reject Bids for Contract FC21-04 Edina City Hall Energy Use and Lighting Improvements K.Request for Purchase: Soils Study for Community Health and Safety Center, 4401 W. 76th St. L.Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1 Normandale Park C Watermain Rehabilitation M.Request for Purchase: Relocate Overhead Power Lines for Morningside Flood Project N.Request for Purchase: Change Order for Edinborough Park Building Automation System Services O.Request for Purchase: MnDOT Highway 169 Noise Wall P.Request for Purchase: Renew AutoCAD Licenses for 3-Year Term Q.Waive Permit Fees for Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 6 Replacement R.Approve Agreements with Soo Line Railroad Company dba Canadian PaciGc S.TraHc Safety Report of September 1, 2022 T.Request for Purchase: Van Valkenburg Park Athletic Field Irrigation Replacement U.Request for Purchase and Waive Permit Fees: Edina Aquatic Center Ingress/Egress Improvements V.Request for Purchase: Envisio Software for Strategic Planning and Performance Dashboards W.Resolution No. 2022-94: Appointing Election Judges for the November 8 General Election VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Heritage Preservation Commission: Century Homes Program B.2022 "Images of Edina" Presentation VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staJ and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eHcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2022-90 CertiGcation of Delinquent Utilities No. DU-22 B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-89 Weed Mowing Special Assessment C.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-91 Tree Removal Special Assessment D.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-85 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-22 E.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-86 Creek Knoll A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-459 F.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-87 Melody Lake A&B, Birchcrest C, Grandview A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-457 G.Public Hearing: Resolution No. 2022-88 50th & France Special Assessments, Improvement No. M-22 H.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-93 CertiGcate of Appropriateness Appeal, 4633 Arden Avenue IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2022-95: Accepting Donations B.Resolution No. 2022-77 and Ordinance No. 2022-11: Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision at 5146 Eden Avenue (Former Public Works Site) C.Resolution No. 2022-81 and Zoning Ordinance No. 2022-13: To revise the PUD-16 Zoning District to include a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan Review for 7200 and 7250 France Avenue X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Minutes: Arts and Culture Commission, July 28 and August 25, 2022 B.Minutes: Transportation Commission, August 18, 2022 C.Advisory Communication: Community Health Commission: Stop the Bleed Initiative XI.Manager's Comments A.Prep Memo for October 6, 2022 XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliGcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Sept. 20, 2022 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, Sept. 20, 2022 Minutes: Draft Regular, Sept. 20, 2022 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Acting Mayor Staunton called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Jackson, Staunton Absent: Pierce, Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. 2023 BUDGET AND PRELIMINARY LEVY AND 2023-2028 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) Manager Neal presented recommendations for the 2023 Budgets and Preliminary Levy that included changes that had occurred to the City’s operating expenses since Council approved the 2022-23 Biennial Budget at the Dec. 7, 2021 meeting. Changes included increased competition, wages, and labor shortages, as well as significantly increased estimated market value (12.4%) and median home value (15%) which was an opportunity to increase investment in capital needs while still reducing property taxes for individual homeowners. Neal said how the proposed 2023 estimated levy increase of 9.89% would add additional funds for general wage increase, market adjustments, and more, and capital needs for Parks and Recreation facilities. Council asked questions and provided feedback. OVERVIEW OF PARKS & RECREATION ENTERPRISES Director McAndrews said how an enterprise was a business that generates revenue for the City that covers the costs of operating; however, this has not always been the case. She discussed the Edina law that allows the City to issue revenue bonds for park & recreation improvements without a referendum and how this allows more flexibility but was capped annually with a certain amount for debt service. McAndrews said how the fees were not set to be 100% self-sustaining and how Liquor subsidizes several enterprises. She reviewed the cost recovery metric for each enterprise, budget vs actual, and combined operating income from 2016-21. McAndrews said best management practices were for fees and service charges to cover the cost of an enterprise fund activity unless the community benefits from the service program. She presented current available funds, project capital needs, and said how available funds for capital needs were minimal. She said options for financing capital improvements were levy, revenue bonds, increased user fees and Local Option Sales Tax. McAndrews said this presentation was to serve as launching point for future discussion. Council asked questions and provided feedback. UTILITY BILLING RATE STUDY UPDATE To recover operational and capital costs, incentivize conservation, support system capacity expansion, and provide adequate cash reserves, the final recommendations beginning in 2023 were restructured water and sewer user rates, storm water, water, and sewer connection fee increases, with sewer connection fee increases mostly on developers. Other changes were utility billing policy changes for billing adjustments for water leak, and a new billing system which will change how the bill looks. Staff will develop a communication plan to inform residents of these changes. Council asked questions and provided feedback. ADJOURNMENT Edina City Council Work Session Meeting, September 20, 2022 Acting Mayor Staunton adjourned the meeting at 6:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, October 6, 2022. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Acting Mayor Staunton called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Jackson, Staunton. Absent: Mayor Hovland, Member Pierce. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Kathleen Lott, 6212 Hillside Road, presented a petition to reconsider the City’s prohibition of ice cream trucks as she felt this activity supported neighborhood community. Helen Ferraro, Blake Road, requested an update on the Blake Road reconstruction project and shared concerns about safety and attitude of contractors. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal shared an update from the Community Comments from the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, approving the consent agenda as presented: V.A. Approve Minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meeting of September 7, 2022 V.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Pre-List Dated September 2, 2022, totaling $1,517,961.93; Pre-List Dated September 9, 2022, totaling $1,318,984.00 V.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-83; Approving the 2023 Budget and Dues Increase for the I-494 Corridor Commission V.D. Reject Bids for Contract ENG 22-18NB West 50th Street and Sunnyslope Road East Turn Lane Improvements V.E. Approve Agreements with Soo Line Railroad Company dba Canadian Pacific V.F. Request for Purchase, Engineering Services Public Works Trench Drain Repairs, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Kimley-Horn, $84,000 V.G. Request for Purchase, Edinborough Park Building Automation System, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northern Air Corporation, $92,714 V.H. Request for Purchase, Change Order No. 2 Electrical Locates, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Hance Utility Service, Inc., $20,000 V.I. Request for Purchase, Police Security Upgrades Ballistic Door Storefront, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, United Glass, Inc., $39,381 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 20, 2022 Page 2 V.J. Request for Purchase, Police Security Upgrades High-Speed Garage Doors, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Miner Ltd., Star Equipment, $73,500 V.K. Request for Purchase, Fire Station #1 Workspace Expansion, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Christianson’s Business Furniture, $25,653.90 V.L. Request for Purchase, McCauley Trail Shared Use Path Phase I, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, New Look Contracting, $221,921.00 V.M. Set December 6, 2022, as the Public Hearing Date for the 2023 Levy and Budget V.N. Approve 2022-2023 Union Contract for LELS Local 486 Police Sergeants V.O. Request for Purchase, Replace Automated CPR Devices, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Stryker Sales Corporation, $55,530 V.P. Approve League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues V.Q. Approve Mann Theatres Business Establishment Name Change for Liquor License V.R. Continue Action to October 6, 2022, for Resolution No. 2022-77 and Ordinance No. 2022-11; Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Subdivision at 5146 Eden Avenue (Former Public Works Site) Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: VII.A. PROCLAMATION; DECLARING SEPTEMBER 17-23 CONSTITUTION WEEK Acting Mayor Staunton read the proclamation in full for the record. Diane Lynch, Monument Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, accepted the Proclamation and thanked the Council. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-81 AND ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 2022-13; TO REVISE THE PUD-16 ZONING DISTRICT TO INCLUDE A NEW OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR 7200 AND 7250 FRANCE AVENUE – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 6, 2022 Community Development Director Teague shared Orion Investment was requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for a completely new redevelopment project for the subject property. This site received a rezoning approval to Planned Unit Development-16 in 2019; however, the project was never constructed. The underlying zoning on the site was POD, Planned Office District and the existing PUD would allow two six-story buildings with 299 unit of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants and 10 owner occupied townhomes. The previous POD, Planned Office District, would allow 113,000 square feet of office/medical office use. He said the existing office buildings and parking ramp on the sites would be removed and noted the existing parking ramp was in a very poor state of repair. Mr. Teague outlined the two phases as proposed then spoke about the proposed affordable housing component and said staff recommended 20% to be affordable and when housing developed in the future that 10% be included to meet the policy. He highlighted how the project would be LEED certified then reviewed the provision of public space as ample and that the height met the separation with 168-foot setback to the nearest residential home at 250 feet. He said the pedestrian and bike connection would be separated on the north-south connection as recommended by the Planning Commission then noted permanent parking for Phase 1 would be required to be included in the Phase 2 development. He said the Planning Commission approved the project unanimously with one condition and said the project met the spirit of the design experience guidelines and while the street typology was currently not met the applicant would be amending the plan to meet the requirement. Drew Stafford, Orion Investments, said they were on schedule for ramp and building demolition which would be staged due to environmental remediation then provided an overview of the project and the importance of engaging the neighborhoods early on which was successful. He spoke about stormwater solutions created, Minutes/Edina City Council/September 20, 2022 Page 3 enhancement of the north/south connection by separating the bike and pedestrian path from vehicle traffic, then spoke about the importance of sustainability in this project through LEED certification. Nate Enger, ESG Architecture and Design, reviewed updates that had occurred since sketch plan that included an ideal opportunity for a mixed use site, 94% of parking below grade, reviewed the strong pedestrian connections, reduced medians, shared greenspace areas, leveraged proof of parking, and the established anchor tenant which will not require surface parking. He outlined phasing with a multi-family hospitality building and retail then reviewed proposed access points, street rooms, and public realm. Traffic Consultant Terhaar responded regarding traffic impacts stating the area was low-speed and that the amount of cut-through traffic should not be large due to its location and type of site. Ted Carlson, Orion Investments, spoke about the potential for district parking as based on Phase I to the north and noted the project would be built for parking today with potential for the future. He said there was great adjacencies for surface parking and that they would continue to work to secure more surface parking. Acting Mayor Staunton opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Public Testimony No one addressed the Council. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to close the public hearing at noon on September 26, 2022, and continue action on Resolution No. 2022-81approving a zoning ordinance amendment and revised overall development plan and site plan review for 7250 and 7200 France Avenue and hold first reading of Ordinance No. 2022-13 amending the zoning ordinance to revise the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development-16 Zoning District to the October 6, 2022, City Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. IX. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION FROM THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – RECEIVED Assistant City Planner Bodeker stated the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) attended their annual joint meeting with City Council on June 21, 2022, where they requested a number of concerns and clarifications be addressed. She stated the HPC was currently working on draft changes to Zoning Code that included a potential escrow fee for landmark properties, with the goal to have the changes before the Planning Commission and Council in 2022 with potential implementation in 2023. Heritage Preservation Commission Chair Schilling requested consideration of acceptance of this communication then added that in no way was the HPC stating the system was broken but that the plan had last been updated in 2008 and was in need of review. She said while the plan had worked in large part with one home torn down and eight that lost their heritage designation things could occur when a project did not follow the plan and if not addressed the HPC cannot uphold the stated goals consistently and fairly. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. IX.B. RESOLUTION 2022-79; APPROVING RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT VACATION AT 5304 WHITING AVENUE – ADOPTED Minutes/Edina City Council/September 20, 2022 Page 4 Director of Engineering Millner said an application was received on August 1, 2022, requesting that a utility easement be vacated at 5304 Whiting Avenue. The public hearing closed at noon on September 12 and no comments were received. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2022-79; vacating public right-of-way easement, 5304 Whiting Avenue. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. IX.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-12 ESTABLISHING LICENSING AND REGULATORY SYSTEM FOR THC-INFUSED EDIBLES AND DRINKS – ADOPTED Mr. Neal said the Council gave Ordinance 2022-12 first reading on September 7 and gave direction to staff to make amendments to the proposed penalty section of the ordinance. He reviewed the modified penalty schedule and said staff recommended second reading/final approval of Ordinance 2022-12, then noted if adopted, the ordinance would become effective immediately. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Anderson made a motion to approve Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2022- 12 establishing a municipal licensing and regulatory system for THC-infused edibles and drinks as presented. Member Jackson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. IX.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-84; ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2023 – ADOPTED Mr. Neal said M.S. 275.065 required that the City adopt a proposed budget and levy and certify the proposed levy to the county auditor by September 30 which will be used to prepare and send parcel specific notices. The City was also required to certify the final property tax levy to the county by December 27, 2022. He said the final levy could be less than or equal to, but not higher, than the preliminary levy and the proposed resolution set the maximum 2023 tax levies at $49,610,800. The HRA adopted a proposed tax levy of $244,400 at their meeting on September 15. The total of all levies included the HRA would result in an overall levy increase of 9.89% percent. The impact of the proposed levy on the median value home ($659,900 in 2023) was a 3.15% decrease in city property taxes to $1,971 annually ($164/month). The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2022-84, adopting the Proposed Budget for the City of Edina for Year 2023 and establishing the Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2023. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. X. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) - Received X.A. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, AUGUST 11, 2022 X.B. MINUTES: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, AUGUST 8, 2022 XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received Minutes/Edina City Council/September 20, 2022 Page 5 XI.A. PREP MEMO FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:54 p.m. Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, and Staunton. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 6, 2022. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 20, 2022, meeting available. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 9.16.22 TOTAL $1,204,587.94 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 9.16.22 TOTAL $59,330.98 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 9.23.22 TOTAL $1,665,047.91 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 9.16.22 TOTAL $1,204,587.94 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 9.16.22 TOTAL $59,330.98 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 9.23.22 TOTAL $1,665,047.91 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 42 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 237,961.612100 Police Special Revenue 756.002300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 976.502500 Conservation & Sustainability 318.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 410.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 508,334.532600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 14,116.534000 Capital Projects 20,500.024200 Equipment Replacement 49,471.365100 Art Center 1,822.165200 Braemar Golf Course 20,661.195200 Braemar Golf Course 439.445300 Aquatic Center 149.105400 Edinborough Park 6,321.445500 Braemar Arena 7,554.505700 Centennial Lakes 5,023.005800 Liquor 130,789.045900 Utility Fund 29,917.315900 Utility Fund 80,500.005900 Utility Fund 37,533.086000 Risk Management 11,040.876100 Equipment Operations 19,040.526200 Information Technology 16,484.366300 Facilities Management 3,022.317100 PS Training Facility 1,025.077200 MN Task Force 1 420.009999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,204,587.94 TOTAL 1,204,587.94 1,204,587.94 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476228 09/16/2022 PRTD 128159 RICHARDS, BRIAN 05-19-2022 05/19/2022 20220916 590.00 CHECK 476228 TOTAL: 590.00 476229 09/16/2022 PRTD 101971 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER 228612-001 08/17/2022 20220916 73.63 CHECK 476229 TOTAL: 73.63 476230 09/16/2022 PRTD 100614 ACE SUPPLY COMPANY INC 078697 08/17/2022 20220916 379.23 CHECK 476230 TOTAL: 379.23 476231 09/16/2022 PRTD 133140 ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS INC INV12050 08/19/2022 20220916 485.00 CHECK 476231 TOTAL: 485.00 476232 09/16/2022 PRTD 139245 ACTIVE SOLUTIONS 20220817 08/17/2022 20220916 667.20 CHECK 476232 TOTAL: 667.20 476233 09/16/2022 PRTD 133483 ACTIVE911 INC 433234 08/06/2022 20220916 756.00 CHECK 476233 TOTAL: 756.00 476234 09/16/2022 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 913825009 07/22/2022 20220916 82.91 ACUSHNET COMPANY 913856222 07/27/2022 20220916 611.90 ACUSHNET COMPANY 913856223 07/27/2022 20220916 161.99 ACUSHNET COMPANY 913886358 08/01/2022 20220916 1,290.54 ACUSHNET COMPANY 914016972 08/22/2022 20220916 240.55 CHECK 476234 TOTAL: 2,387.89 476235 09/16/2022 PRTD 133504 AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 70724 08/17/2022 20220916 1,180.00 CHECK 476235 TOTAL: 1,180.00 476236 09/16/2022 PRTD 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 9129016995 08/16/2022 20220916 382.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476236 TOTAL: 382.41 476237 09/16/2022 PRTD 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 12759 08/17/2022 20220916 1,200.00 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 12760 08/17/2022 20220916 1,200.00 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 12807 08/18/2022 20220916 1,200.00 CHECK 476237 TOTAL: 3,600.00 476238 09/16/2022 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13NG-R434-6FTD 08/12/2022 20220916 129.28 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GM3-NKPD-FW1G 08/12/2022 20220916 57.52 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JXF-MP7Q-JG6W 08/13/2022 20220916 22.57 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HW6-KKVY-QFNG 08/14/2022 20220916 10.38 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1J7R-HQ7J-RT4N 08/14/2022 20220916 46.20 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 177K-FK17-C4NT 08/17/2022 20220916 18.85 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1D49-9461-CH4K 08/17/2022 20220916 419.91 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PPV-FD13-19J1 08/17/2022 20220916 59.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17C7-NWJR-1PT3 08/17/2022 20220916 543.16 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FWT-MPRJ-61MR 08/17/2022 20220916 1,072.23 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LVV-MN7K-6D4L 08/17/2022 20220916 47.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1M9C-X9KR-1J1H 08/18/2022 20220916 120.48 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WKD-RKVX-46G4 08/18/2022 20220916 1,397.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WT7-XG4P-6JR1 08/18/2022 20220916 10.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11K3-Y4H9-6JJ9 08/18/2022 20220916 13.11 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TLN-4M9M-73TQ 08/18/2022 20220916 -43.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YR7-THJC-GCRM 08/19/2022 20220916 36.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1H7P-N3VW-HFC1 08/19/2022 20220916 36.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T74-GNGN-NK37 08/20/2022 20220916 22.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PHC-JMJY-T19V 08/21/2022 20220916 40.82 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T74-GNGN-WNMH 08/21/2022 20220916 7.49 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MHD-QCVJ-CQL4 08/30/2022 20220916 664.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LDM-Y6W6-1Q1M 09/08/2022 20220916 2,399.92 CHECK 476238 TOTAL: 7,137.72 476239 09/16/2022 PRTD 141691 ANDERSON, WENDY S 16 08/18/2022 20220916 3,891.30 CHECK 476239 TOTAL: 3,891.30 476240 09/16/2022 PRTD 119976 AP LAWN EDINA-722LD 08/18/2022 20220916 10,000.00 CHECK 476240 TOTAL: 10,000.00 476241 09/16/2022 PRTD 118491 APPLE INC AJ25792182 08/18/2022 20220916 1,786.00 CHECK 476241 TOTAL: 1,786.00 476242 09/16/2022 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500075464 08/17/2022 20220916 246.43 CHECK 476242 TOTAL: 246.43 476243 09/16/2022 PRTD 138214 ASHPOOL, LILLEBEL VALBORG 08-18-2022 08/18/2022 20220916 500.00 CHECK 476243 TOTAL: 500.00 476244 09/16/2022 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 299024 08/19/2022 20220916 141.65 ASPEN MILLS INC 299023 08/19/2022 20220916 103.89 ASPEN MILLS INC 299022 08/19/2022 20220916 79.99 CHECK 476244 TOTAL: 325.53 476245 09/16/2022 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1422086-090122 09/01/2022 20220916 7,160.12 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1406543-090122 09/01/2022 20220916 9,584.31 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1405453-090122 09/01/2022 20220916 2,866.97 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1146354-090122 09/01/2022 20220916 298.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476245 TOTAL: 19,909.80 476246 09/16/2022 PRTD 101718 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119482 08/22/2022 20220916 30.55 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119651 08/22/2022 20220916 30.55 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119640 08/22/2022 20220916 27.66 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119204 08/22/2022 20220916 28.56 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380114373 07/13/2022 20220916 5.48 CHECK 476246 TOTAL: 122.80 476247 09/16/2022 PRTD 140424 AXON ENTERPRISES INC INUS092787 08/17/2022 20220916 5,234.40 CHECK 476247 TOTAL: 5,234.40 476248 09/16/2022 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271898.00-9 08/12/2022 20220916 79,432.50 CHECK 476248 TOTAL: 79,432.50 476249 09/16/2022 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096261000 08/25/2022 20220916 1,011.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096263700 08/25/2022 20220916 1,686.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0105651200 08/25/2022 20220916 26.67 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096233900 08/25/2022 20220916 231.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096234000 08/25/2022 20220916 179.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0105651300 08/25/2022 20220916 125.02 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096263500 08/25/2022 20220916 1,537.35 CHECK 476249 TOTAL: 4,797.39 476250 09/16/2022 PRTD 144783 BELYN KEY LLC 20039 08/19/2022 20220916 357.79 BELYN KEY LLC 3401 09/06/2022 20220916 -177.60 CHECK 476250 TOTAL: 180.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476251 09/16/2022 PRTD 142254 BERLA CORPORATION 22-J03-0526 08/18/2022 20220916 2,800.00 CHECK 476251 TOTAL: 2,800.00 476252 09/16/2022 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5090323 08/17/2022 20220916 468.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5091412 08/18/2022 20220916 234.00 CHECK 476252 TOTAL: 702.00 476253 09/16/2022 PRTD 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 16254 08/17/2022 22100035 20220916 30,256.55 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 16253 08/17/2022 22100033 20220916 30,256.55 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 16255 08/17/2022 22100034 20220916 30,256.55 CHECK 476253 TOTAL: 90,769.65 476254 09/16/2022 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 18952 08/25/2022 20220916 198.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 18951 08/25/2022 20220916 198.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 18953 08/25/2022 20220916 589.00 CHECK 476254 TOTAL: 985.00 476255 09/16/2022 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0295210 08/17/2022 20220916 976.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 0295211 08/17/2022 20220916 4,270.00 CHECK 476255 TOTAL: 5,246.50 476256 09/16/2022 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84644942 08/16/2022 20220916 1,844.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84646902 08/17/2022 20220916 85.16 CHECK 476256 TOTAL: 1,929.16 476257 09/16/2022 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 189704 08/30/2022 20220916 727.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 189702 08/30/2022 20220916 576.92 CHECK 476257 TOTAL: 1,303.92 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476258 09/16/2022 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC F224294 08/17/2022 22100032 20220916 48,588.90 CHECK 476258 TOTAL: 48,588.90 476259 09/16/2022 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390406 08/24/2022 20220916 3,594.22 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390404 08/24/2022 20220916 185.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390405 08/24/2022 20220916 651.55 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390402 08/24/2022 20220916 82.41 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390400 08/24/2022 20220916 1,137.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390401 08/24/2022 20220916 1,859.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390375 08/24/2022 20220916 2,188.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390377 08/24/2022 20220916 21.21 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390374 08/24/2022 20220916 185.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390376 08/24/2022 20220916 212.86 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390379 08/24/2022 20220916 140.55 CHECK 476259 TOTAL: 10,258.80 476260 09/16/2022 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464066 08/30/2022 20220916 4,722.85 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464065 08/30/2022 20220916 154.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464007 08/30/2022 20220916 67.70 CHECK 476260 TOTAL: 4,944.95 476261 09/16/2022 PRTD 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 22EP0929 09/06/2022 20220916 250.00 CHECK 476261 TOTAL: 250.00 476262 09/16/2022 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 934905510 05/24/2022 20220916 822.36 CALLAWAY GOLF 935114952 06/27/2022 20220916 131.40 CHECK 476262 TOTAL: 953.76 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476263 09/16/2022 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2730073 08/26/2022 20220916 -62.62 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2730935 08/26/2022 20220916 817.95 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2730993 08/26/2022 20220916 1,814.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2730936 08/26/2022 20220916 39.49 CHECK 476263 TOTAL: 2,609.07 476264 09/16/2022 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 21351 08/16/2022 20220916 410.00 CHECK 476264 TOTAL: 410.00 476265 09/16/2022 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV143436 08/13/2022 20220916 95.00 CHECK 476265 TOTAL: 95.00 476266 09/16/2022 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128949983 08/22/2022 20220916 33.63 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128949974 08/22/2022 20220916 26.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128949949 08/22/2022 20220916 17.87 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128949901 08/22/2022 20220916 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128950044 08/22/2022 20220916 27.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128950692 08/22/2022 20220916 16.32 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128950653 08/22/2022 20220916 87.50 CINTAS CORPORATION 4128950637 08/22/2022 20220916 154.66 CHECK 476266 TOTAL: 376.29 476267 09/16/2022 PRTD 141530 CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN-TF1 11/5/20 11/05/2020 20220916 210.00 CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN-TFL OT #2 01/03/2020 20220916 210.00 CHECK 476267 TOTAL: 420.00 476268 09/16/2022 PRTD 146213 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 22EP0915 09/06/2022 20220916 165.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476268 TOTAL: 165.00 476269 09/16/2022 PRTD 140274 CIVICPLUS, LLC 237535 08/19/2022 20220916 138.50 CHECK 476269 TOTAL: 138.50 476270 09/16/2022 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0023973-09/22 09/03/2022 20220916 9.00 CHECK 476270 TOTAL: 9.00 476271 09/16/2022 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0007539-08/22 08/08/2022 20220916 925.86 CHECK 476271 TOTAL: 925.86 476272 09/16/2022 PRTD 104928 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 28929 08/16/2022 20220916 22.20 CHECK 476272 TOTAL: 22.20 476273 09/16/2022 PRTD 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 0222245-IN 08/17/2022 20220916 54.48 CHECK 476273 TOTAL: 54.48 476274 09/16/2022 PRTD 100012 CORE & MAIN R436442 08/22/2022 20220916 509.70 CHECK 476274 TOTAL: 509.70 476275 09/16/2022 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X87661803 08/31/2022 20220916 264.67 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X87763708 08/31/2022 20220916 216.51 CHECK 476275 TOTAL: 481.18 476276 09/16/2022 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3972946 08/17/2022 20220916 893.58 CHECK 476276 TOTAL: 893.58 476277 09/16/2022 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P54247270 08/19/2022 20220916 269.90 CHECK 476277 TOTAL: 269.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476278 09/16/2022 PRTD 151184 DETECTACHEM, INC. INV08560 08/19/2022 20220916 94.80 CHECK 476278 TOTAL: 94.80 476279 09/16/2022 PRTD 150827 DRASTIC MEASURES BREWING, LLC 2553 08/25/2022 20220916 150.80 CHECK 476279 TOTAL: 150.80 476280 09/16/2022 PRTD 160370 DURAMAX ASPHALT LLC 2192347 08/18/2022 20220916 700.00 CHECK 476280 TOTAL: 700.00 476281 09/16/2022 PRTD 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS INV1571157 08/17/2022 20220916 531.56 CHECK 476281 TOTAL: 531.56 476282 09/16/2022 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 907170 08/18/2022 20220916 160.65 CHECK 476282 TOTAL: 160.65 476283 09/16/2022 PRTD 143018 ECO WORKS SUPPLY 9024 08/22/2022 20220916 3,200.20 CHECK 476283 TOTAL: 3,200.20 476284 09/16/2022 PRTD 160507 EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION 001 08/17/2022 20220916 5,013.60 CHECK 476284 TOTAL: 5,013.60 476285 09/16/2022 PRTD 143359 EDINA VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION 002 08/17/2022 20220916 4,376.00 EDINA VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION 001 08/17/2022 20220916 2,576.00 CHECK 476285 TOTAL: 6,952.00 476286 09/16/2022 PRTD 124231 ERVASTI, DARRELL 15463 08/19/2022 20220916 1,763.80 CHECK 476286 TOTAL: 1,763.80 476287 09/16/2022 PRTD 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC CC6697 08/18/2022 20220916 9,920.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476287 TOTAL: 9,920.00 476288 09/16/2022 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-459666 08/16/2022 20220916 290.42 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-459668 08/16/2022 20220916 95.96 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7889713 08/16/2022 20220916 52.32 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7890420 08/16/2022 20220916 560.70 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-459763 08/16/2022 20220916 12.54 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7892318 08/16/2022 20220916 22.72 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-Z30124 08/16/2022 20220916 234.56 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-460286 08/22/2022 20220916 171.79 CHECK 476288 TOTAL: 1,441.01 476289 09/16/2022 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-7474 08/25/2022 20220916 357.00 CHECK 476289 TOTAL: 357.00 476290 09/16/2022 PRTD 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY MNTC1273121 08/17/2022 20220916 318.00 CHECK 476290 TOTAL: 318.00 476291 09/16/2022 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0499955 08/17/2022 20220916 1,245.80 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0499950 08/19/2022 20220916 1,481.44 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0490938-1 08/19/2022 20220916 2,373.67 CHECK 476291 TOTAL: 5,100.91 476292 09/16/2022 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 626488 08/17/2022 20220916 344.84 DAIOHS USA INC 626493 08/17/2022 20220916 300.45 CHECK 476292 TOTAL: 645.29 476293 09/16/2022 PRTD 130699 FLEETPRIDE INC 101767273 08/22/2022 20220916 199.96 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476293 TOTAL: 199.96 476294 09/16/2022 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1689018 08/17/2022 20220916 90.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1691173 08/19/2022 20220916 31.49 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1690687 08/19/2022 20220916 438.62 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1690902 08/19/2022 20220916 101.98 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1691368 08/22/2022 20220916 410.77 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 470880 09/08/2022 20220916 -57.00 CHECK 476294 TOTAL: 1,015.86 476295 09/16/2022 PRTD 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LL 220743 08/16/2022 20220916 1,330.50 CHECK 476295 TOTAL: 1,330.50 476296 09/16/2022 PRTD 160231 BOLDENOW, CINDY GG220817 08/19/2022 20220916 1,557.00 CHECK 476296 TOTAL: 1,557.00 476297 09/16/2022 PRTD 160442 GOLDEN WEST INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 2114743 07/14/2022 20220916 371.67 CHECK 476297 TOTAL: 371.67 476298 09/16/2022 PRTD 100781 MJ DONOVAN ENTERPRISES INC 146284 08/16/2022 20220916 128.84 CHECK 476298 TOTAL: 128.84 476299 09/16/2022 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9414015165 08/17/2022 20220916 334.55 WW GRAINGER 9415984062 08/18/2022 20220916 39.12 CHECK 476299 TOTAL: 373.67 476300 09/16/2022 PRTD 160228 GRANICUS LLC 154940 08/16/2022 20220916 12,511.00 GRANICUS LLC 18548 08/19/2022 20220916 -10,808.31 CHECK 476300 TOTAL: 1,702.69 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476301 09/16/2022 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00117818 08/25/2022 20220916 2,551.32 WINEBOW MN00117902 08/25/2022 20220916 1,019.88 WINEBOW MN00118088 08/30/2022 20220916 458.19 WINEBOW MN00118091 08/30/2022 20220916 958.32 CHECK 476301 TOTAL: 4,987.71 476302 09/16/2022 PRTD 160003 GRAY, GLENN S EPR-0825-22 08/25/2022 20220916 2,615.00 CHECK 476302 TOTAL: 2,615.00 476303 09/16/2022 PRTD 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC INC 24157 08/17/2022 20220916 726.67 CHECK 476303 TOTAL: 726.67 476304 09/16/2022 PRTD 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC 4-456337 08/17/2022 20220916 51.87 CHECK 476304 TOTAL: 51.87 476305 09/16/2022 PRTD 100790 HACH COMPANY 13194425 08/15/2022 20220916 319.71 CHECK 476305 TOTAL: 319.71 476306 09/16/2022 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 2415 08/21/2022 20220916 238.00 CHECK 476306 TOTAL: 238.00 476307 09/16/2022 PRTD 130116 HARRIS SRVCE000000002587 08/17/2022 20220916 639.34 CHECK 476307 TOTAL: 639.34 476308 09/16/2022 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0236601 08/16/2022 20220916 7,600.00 CHECK 476308 TOTAL: 7,600.00 476309 09/16/2022 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-3904 08/25/2022 20220916 126.00 CHECK 476309 TOTAL: 126.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476310 09/16/2022 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 535321 08/26/2022 20220916 330.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 536298 08/30/2022 20220916 1,601.80 HOHENSTEINS INC 536296 08/30/2022 20220916 3,668.10 CHECK 476310 TOTAL: 5,599.90 476311 09/16/2022 PRTD 151094 HOPKINS SPORTS CAMPS LLC 2022-08-17 08/17/2022 20220916 2,259.20 CHECK 476311 TOTAL: 2,259.20 476312 09/16/2022 PRTD 116680 HP INC 9016596170 08/18/2022 20220916 12,552.30 CHECK 476312 TOTAL: 12,552.30 476313 09/16/2022 PRTD 129508 IMPACT MAILING OF MINNESOTA INC 201474 08/22/2022 20220916 3,576.46 CHECK 476313 TOTAL: 3,576.46 476314 09/16/2022 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 602341 08/18/2022 20220916 1,000.00 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 602344 08/18/2022 20220916 400.00 CHECK 476314 TOTAL: 1,400.00 476315 09/16/2022 PRTD 150755 INTEGRATED CITY SOLUTIONS 1059 08/18/2022 20220916 9,520.00 CHECK 476315 TOTAL: 9,520.00 476316 09/16/2022 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 08/23/26 08/26/2022 20220916 107.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 5301 08/26/2022 20220916 107.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 5300 08/26/2022 20220916 107.00 CHECK 476316 TOTAL: 321.00 476317 09/16/2022 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC 08/2022 08/31/2022 20220916 128.93 CHECK 476317 TOTAL: 128.93 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476318 09/16/2022 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC STREETS-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 172.80 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 317.78 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC GOLF-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 9.54 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC EQUIP OPS-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 3.94 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC ENG-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 82.74 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC POLICE-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 51.79 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC EQUIP OPS-08/2022-1 08/25/2022 20220916 27.31 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC ELEC-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220916 90.33 CHECK 476318 TOTAL: 756.23 476319 09/16/2022 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3556095 08/25/2022 20220916 1,219.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3556098 08/25/2022 20220916 120.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3556097 08/25/2022 20220916 1,316.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3556096 08/25/2022 20220916 2,297.50 CHECK 476319 TOTAL: 4,953.10 476320 09/16/2022 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452222 08/25/2022 20220916 161.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452223 08/25/2022 20220916 549.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452224 08/25/2022 20220916 162.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452225 08/25/2022 20220916 49.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6410350A 06/09/2022 20220916 2.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452231 08/25/2022 20220916 34.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452228 08/25/2022 20220916 2,119.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452229 08/25/2022 20220916 441.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6452230 08/26/2022 20220916 1,479.30 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6451573 08/25/2022 20220916 110.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6451570 08/25/2022 20220916 1,145.70 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6451571 08/25/2022 20220916 1,457.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6451572 08/25/2022 20220916 2,187.63 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6451569 08/25/2022 20220916 118.35 CHECK 476320 TOTAL: 10,019.03 476321 09/16/2022 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7393122 08/25/2022 20220916 1,216.75 WINE MERCHANTS 7393124 08/25/2022 20220916 1,721.45 WINE MERCHANTS 7393123 08/25/2022 20220916 855.55 WINE MERCHANTS 7392987 08/25/2022 20220916 1,100.15 WINE MERCHANTS 7392986 08/25/2022 20220916 26.35 CHECK 476321 TOTAL: 4,920.25 476322 09/16/2022 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123216 08/25/2022 20220916 483.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123218 08/25/2022 20220916 857.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123219 08/25/2022 20220916 1,059.06 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123220 08/25/2022 20220916 1,501.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123221 08/25/2022 20220916 123.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123222 08/25/2022 20220916 1,389.94 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2124337 08/26/2022 20220916 245.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123233 08/25/2022 20220916 463.71 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123236 08/25/2022 20220916 33.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123231 08/25/2022 20220916 2,941.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123232 08/25/2022 20220916 1,069.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123234 08/25/2022 20220916 232.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123235 08/25/2022 20220916 1,746.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123229 08/25/2022 20220916 1,865.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123228 08/25/2022 20220916 1,587.42 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123227 08/25/2022 20220916 427.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123226 08/25/2022 20220916 1,407.48 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123217 08/25/2022 20220916 241.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2124599 08/26/2022 20220916 207.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2124339 08/26/2022 20220916 386.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122519 08/25/2022 20220916 2,114.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122517 08/25/2022 20220916 777.79 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122516 08/25/2022 20220916 1,136.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122518 08/25/2022 20220916 1,393.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122514 08/25/2022 20220916 1,536.61 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122513 08/25/2022 20220916 896.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122512 08/25/2022 20220916 743.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122511 08/25/2022 20220916 241.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2124338 08/26/2022 20220916 386.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2123230 08/30/2022 20220916 895.80 CHECK 476322 TOTAL: 28,394.19 476323 09/16/2022 PRTD 145396 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 004595 08/24/2022 20220916 177.00 CHECK 476323 TOTAL: 177.00 476324 09/16/2022 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2804047 08/25/2022 20220916 63.20 KELBRO COMPANY 2803957 08/26/2022 20220916 178.00 KELBRO COMPANY 2804046 08/25/2022 20220916 134.45 KELBRO COMPANY 2805610 08/30/2022 20220916 68.30 CHECK 476324 TOTAL: 443.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476325 09/16/2022 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 22243758 07/31/2022 20220916 14,116.53 CHECK 476325 TOTAL: 14,116.53 476326 09/16/2022 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 175496 08/24/2022 20220916 260.70 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 175497 08/24/2022 20220916 881.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 175490 08/24/2022 20220916 2,048.32 CHECK 476326 TOTAL: 3,190.52 476327 09/16/2022 PRTD 130042 KULLY SUPPLY INC 587363 08/16/2022 20220916 360.64 CHECK 476327 TOTAL: 360.64 476328 09/16/2022 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 5791 08/26/2022 20220916 218.00 CHECK 476328 TOTAL: 218.00 476329 09/16/2022 PRTD 100378 LAKE MANAGEMENT INC 41267 03/02/2022 20220916 10,484.54 CHECK 476329 TOTAL: 10,484.54 476330 09/16/2022 PRTD 151172 HOLMAN, JACOB 105 06/29/2022 20220916 7,293.00 HOLMAN, JACOB 106 07/29/2022 20220916 7,293.00 CHECK 476330 TOTAL: 14,586.00 476331 09/16/2022 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 03-933611 08/17/2022 20220916 210.56 CHECK 476331 TOTAL: 210.56 476332 09/16/2022 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9309851714 08/18/2022 20220916 48.77 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9309855846 08/19/2022 20220916 1,393.81 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9309855847 08/19/2022 20220916 371.36 CHECK 476332 TOTAL: 1,813.94 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476333 09/16/2022 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19174 07/01/2022 20220916 4,000.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19176 07/01/2022 20220916 920.94 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19188 07/01/2022 20220916 340.83 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19192 07/01/2022 20220916 2,145.40 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19249 07/01/2022 20220916 294.96 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19208 07/01/2022 20220916 2,471.70 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19211 07/01/2022 20220916 567.93 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19214 07/01/2022 20220916 299.11 CHECK 476333 TOTAL: 11,040.87 476334 09/16/2022 PRTD 128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY 21854 08/22/2022 20220916 9,825.00 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY 21868 08/22/2022 20220916 17,470.00 CHECK 476334 TOTAL: 27,295.00 476335 09/16/2022 PRTD 160497 LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 2203542-IN 08/16/2022 20220916 272.20 CHECK 476335 TOTAL: 272.20 476336 09/16/2022 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 48616 08/24/2022 20220916 636.00 LIBATION PROJECT 48857 08/30/2022 20220916 610.00 LIBATION PROJECT 48856 08/30/2022 20220916 114.00 CHECK 476336 TOTAL: 1,360.00 476337 09/16/2022 PRTD 117026 LIFE-ASSIST INC 1242843 08/22/2022 20220916 31.80 CHECK 476337 TOTAL: 31.80 476338 09/16/2022 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 47141 08/24/2022 20220916 138.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 47138 08/24/2022 20220916 258.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 47166 08/25/2022 20220916 138.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476338 TOTAL: 534.00 476339 09/16/2022 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P02603 06/03/2022 20220916 485.00 CHECK 476339 TOTAL: 485.00 476340 09/16/2022 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV826144 08/24/2022 20220916 1,878.52 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV826147 08/24/2022 20220916 318.96 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV826149 08/23/2022 20220916 133.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV826160 08/24/2022 20220916 253.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV826932 08/24/2022 20220916 185.46 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV830183 08/30/2022 20220916 209.46 CHECK 476340 TOTAL: 2,979.40 476341 09/16/2022 PRTD 160372 MAVO SYSTEMS INC 84690 08/16/2022 20220916 2,167.00 CHECK 476341 TOTAL: 2,167.00 476342 09/16/2022 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 647511 08/24/2022 20220916 57.25 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 647510 08/24/2022 20220916 341.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 647509 08/24/2022 20220916 981.50 CHECK 476342 TOTAL: 1,379.75 476343 09/16/2022 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 67116 08/16/2022 20220916 23.98 MENARDS 67162 08/16/2022 20220916 67.95 MENARDS 67133 08/16/2022 20220916 65.62 MENARDS 67263 08/18/2022 20220916 5.95 MENARDS 67257 08/18/2022 20220916 25.97 MENARDS 67258 08/18/2022 20220916 37.98 MENARDS 67342 08/19/2022 20220916 83.15 MENARDS 67319 08/19/2022 20220916 78.11 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MENARDS 67324 08/19/2022 20220916 239.60 MENARDS 67325 08/19/2022 20220916 246.90 CHECK 476343 TOTAL: 875.21 476344 09/16/2022 PRTD 100885 METRO SALES INC INV2106101 08/16/2022 20220916 1,507.90 CHECK 476344 TOTAL: 1,507.90 476345 09/16/2022 PRTD 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY INC 44366 08/17/2022 20220916 1,107.75 CHECK 476345 TOTAL: 1,107.75 476346 09/16/2022 PRTD 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WA 36449 08/19/2022 20220916 7,320.00 CHECK 476346 TOTAL: 7,320.00 476347 09/16/2022 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180212037 08/07/2022 20220916 12.90 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180212360 08/07/2022 20220916 24.73 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180212361 08/07/2022 20220916 36.56 CHECK 476347 TOTAL: 74.19 476348 09/16/2022 PRTD 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC 1871140-00 08/18/2022 20220916 39.94 CHECK 476348 TOTAL: 39.94 476349 09/16/2022 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P80712 08/22/2022 20220916 11.92 CHECK 476349 TOTAL: 11.92 476350 09/16/2022 PRTD 160511 MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION 2022 DUES-HOVLAND 09/01/2022 20220916 30.00 CHECK 476350 TOTAL: 30.00 476351 09/16/2022 PRTD 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPANY 86597 08/19/2022 20220916 1,740.00 CHECK 476351 TOTAL: 1,740.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476352 09/16/2022 PRTD 117837 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 08302022 08/30/2022 20220916 600.00 CHECK 476352 TOTAL: 600.00 476353 09/16/2022 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-34131 08/30/2022 20220916 546.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-34132 08/30/2022 20220916 517.00 CHECK 476353 TOTAL: 1,063.00 476354 09/16/2022 PRTD 100912 MOTOROLA INC 1411000736 08/18/2022 20220916 438.18 CHECK 476354 TOTAL: 438.18 476355 09/16/2022 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1359804-00 08/16/2022 20220916 53.45 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1359526-00 08/17/2022 20220916 147.74 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1360219-00 08/18/2022 20220916 153.02 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1351459-01 08/19/2022 20220916 2,211.56 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1360254-00 08/19/2022 20220916 -17.56 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1338565-01 08/22/2022 20220916 87.72 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1356390-01 08/22/2022 20220916 1,375.40 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1359526-01 08/22/2022 20220916 118.74 CHECK 476355 TOTAL: 4,130.07 476356 09/16/2022 PRTD 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 676392 08/19/2022 20220916 535.50 CHECK 476356 TOTAL: 535.50 476357 09/16/2022 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 191825 08/24/2022 20220916 452.50 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 189974A 07/12/2022 20220916 2.50 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 191824 08/25/2022 20220916 646.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 191826 08/24/2022 20220916 391.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476357 TOTAL: 1,492.50 476358 09/16/2022 PRTD 104350 NIKE USA INC 9657555860 07/22/2022 20220916 318.87 NIKE USA INC 9658180944 07/26/2022 20220916 1,116.07 NIKE USA INC 9663467235 08/18/2022 20220916 101.15 NIKE USA INC 9663467236 08/19/2022 20220916 1,197.99 CHECK 476358 TOTAL: 2,734.08 476359 09/16/2022 PRTD 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 518264 08/22/2022 20220916 150.00 CHECK 476359 TOTAL: 150.00 476360 09/16/2022 PRTD 100926 BLUETARP FINANCIAL INC 0031328841 08/17/2022 20220916 100.98 CHECK 476360 TOTAL: 100.98 476361 09/16/2022 PRTD 160385 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 261528307001 08/15/2022 20220916 144.98 CHECK 476361 TOTAL: 144.98 476362 09/16/2022 PRTD 126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC 16318 08/16/2022 20220916 9,994.87 CHECK 476362 TOTAL: 9,994.87 476363 09/16/2022 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-12532 08/22/2022 20220916 120.00 CHECK 476363 TOTAL: 120.00 476364 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 DIERKE, DARLENE 273-22-2486 09/13/2022 20220916 100.84 CHECK 476364 TOTAL: 100.84 476365 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 EDIN, JUDITH 273-22-3020 09/13/2022 20220916 947.20 CHECK 476365 TOTAL: 947.20 476366 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 FOSTER, LINDA 273-22-2186 09/13/2022 20220916 41.51 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476366 TOTAL: 41.51 476367 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 GOLDBERG, JOSEPH 273-22-2603 09/13/2022 20220916 82.87 CHECK 476367 TOTAL: 82.87 476368 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 GOLDBERG, JOSEPH 273-22-2564 09/13/2022 20220916 82.87 CHECK 476368 TOTAL: 82.87 476369 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 GOLDEN, JANE 273-21-2854 09/13/2022 20220916 78.09 CHECK 476369 TOTAL: 78.09 476370 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 GRAY, CHARLES 273-22-0074-1 09/13/2022 20220916 85.59 CHECK 476370 TOTAL: 85.59 476371 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 GURSTEL, NORMAN 273-21-3445 09/13/2022 20220916 78.09 CHECK 476371 TOTAL: 78.09 476372 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 MEDICA 273-21-2878 09/13/2022 20220916 18.10 CHECK 476372 TOTAL: 18.10 476373 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 MEDICA 273-20-5332 09/13/2022 20220916 503.64 CHECK 476373 TOTAL: 503.64 476374 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 NELSON, JOHN 273-21-0302 09/13/2022 20220916 100.00 CHECK 476374 TOTAL: 100.00 476375 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 OLSON, CAMMIE 273-22-2158 09/13/2022 20220916 101.48 CHECK 476375 TOTAL: 101.48 476376 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 ROESER, DAVID 273-21-6275 09/13/2022 20220916 328.61 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476376 TOTAL: 328.61 476377 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 SJOGREN, SANDRA 273-22-0155 09/13/2022 20220916 60.00 CHECK 476377 TOTAL: 60.00 476378 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 UCARE 273-21-0387 09/13/2022 20220916 490.55 CHECK 476378 TOTAL: 490.55 476379 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 UMR 273-21-5389 09/13/2022 20220916 608.55 CHECK 476379 TOTAL: 608.55 476380 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 UNDERDAHL, DORIS 273-22-1457 09/13/2022 20220916 86.88 CHECK 476380 TOTAL: 86.88 476381 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 UNITED HEALTHCARE MEDICARE SOLUTI 273-21-0007 09/13/2022 20220916 195.36 CHECK 476381 TOTAL: 195.36 476382 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 WIGGIN, PAUL 273-22-2681 09/13/2022 20220916 103.57 CHECK 476382 TOTAL: 103.57 476383 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 WIGGIN, PAUL 273-22-2651 09/13/2022 20220916 103.73 CHECK 476383 TOTAL: 103.73 476384 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 WPS TRICARE ADMINISTRATION 273-21-5527 09/13/2022 20220916 90.29 CHECK 476384 TOTAL: 90.29 476385 09/16/2022 PRTD 999998 WPS TRICARE ADMINISTRATION 273-21-3226 09/13/2022 20220916 46.80 CHECK 476385 TOTAL: 46.80 476386 09/16/2022 PRTD 999995 Altmark, Stan ED175351-REFUND 09/14/2022 20220916 9,440.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476386 TOTAL: 9,440.00 476387 09/16/2022 PRTD 999995 Streeter Custom Builder ED180273-REFUND 09/08/2022 20220916 9,560.00 CHECK 476387 TOTAL: 9,560.00 476388 09/16/2022 PRTD 999997 Butler, Barbara 00085676-9/12/2022 09/12/2022 20220916 397.39 CHECK 476388 TOTAL: 397.39 476389 09/16/2022 PRTD 999997 Eide, Julia 00096597-9/7/2022 09/07/2022 20220916 219.07 CHECK 476389 TOTAL: 219.07 476390 09/16/2022 PRTD 999997 Stadum, Elizabeth 00101805-9/13/22 09/13/2022 20220916 88.06 CHECK 476390 TOTAL: 88.06 476391 09/16/2022 PRTD 100940 OWENS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INC 30609 08/16/2022 20220916 901.00 CHECK 476391 TOTAL: 901.00 476392 09/16/2022 PRTD 136189 P & W GOLF SUPPLY LLC INV99417 08/17/2022 20220916 389.77 CHECK 476392 TOTAL: 389.77 476393 09/16/2022 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 31941856 08/29/2022 20220916 242.08 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 27288155 08/29/2022 20220916 541.34 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 75446579 08/25/2022 20220916 -650.40 CHECK 476393 TOTAL: 133.02 476394 09/16/2022 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-160055 08/25/2022 20220916 103.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-160056 08/25/2022 20220916 178.50 CHECK 476394 TOTAL: 281.50 476395 09/16/2022 PRTD 160481 PG GOLF LLC SN000119272 07/19/2022 20220916 116.22 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476395 TOTAL: 116.22 476396 09/16/2022 PRTD 160504 HAWLEY, ALANA D3 08/21/2022 20220916 230.36 CHECK 476396 TOTAL: 230.36 476397 09/16/2022 PRTD 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1038303 08/18/2022 20220916 100.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1038305 08/18/2022 20220916 1,000.00 CHECK 476397 TOTAL: 1,100.00 476398 09/16/2022 PRTD 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318972078 08/31/2022 20220916 14.00 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318975932 08/31/2022 20220916 10.00 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318901993 07/26/2022 20220916 38.99 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318929838 08/08/2022 20220916 41.99 CHECK 476398 TOTAL: 104.98 476399 09/16/2022 PRTD 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 100973 08/19/2022 20220916 138.00 CHECK 476399 TOTAL: 138.00 476400 09/16/2022 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 106393 08/19/2022 20220916 711.36 CHECK 476400 TOTAL: 711.36 476401 09/16/2022 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 160020 08/19/2022 20220916 611.28 CHECK 476401 TOTAL: 611.28 476402 09/16/2022 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-42070 08/25/2022 20220916 397.00 CHECK 476402 TOTAL: 397.00 476403 09/16/2022 PRTD 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC 59861 08/19/2022 20220916 556.40 CHECK 476403 TOTAL: 556.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476404 09/16/2022 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 85352 08/17/2022 20220916 4,048.30 CHECK 476404 TOTAL: 4,048.30 476405 09/16/2022 PRTD 100980 ROBERT B HILL COMPANY 404214 08/22/2022 20220916 217.68 ROBERT B HILL COMPANY 404215 08/22/2022 20220916 217.68 CHECK 476405 TOTAL: 435.36 476406 09/16/2022 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 229985769 08/16/2022 20220916 30.00 ORKIN 229985232 08/16/2022 20220916 26.28 CHECK 476406 TOTAL: 56.28 476407 09/16/2022 PRTD 160330 RYPSTICK GOLF 2022071 06/13/2022 20220916 799.79 CHECK 476407 TOTAL: 799.79 476408 09/16/2022 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC 10 08/15/2022 20220916 508,334.53 CHECK 476408 TOTAL: 508,334.53 476409 09/16/2022 PRTD 160055 SANDSTROM LAND MANAGEMENT 081922 08/19/2022 20220916 1,202.25 CHECK 476409 TOTAL: 1,202.25 476410 09/16/2022 PRTD 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC 64299 08/31/2022 20220916 138.00 CHECK 476410 TOTAL: 138.00 476411 09/16/2022 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP INC 68605 08/19/2022 20220916 765.00 CHECK 476411 TOTAL: 765.00 476412 09/16/2022 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 431622 08/16/2022 20220916 389.38 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 431623 08/16/2022 20220916 1,866.72 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 431690 08/16/2022 20220916 90.01 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 431691 08/16/2022 20220916 529.14 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476412 TOTAL: 2,875.25 476413 09/16/2022 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 17449 08/16/2022 20220916 689.29 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 17464 08/16/2022 20220916 382.69 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 17472 08/16/2022 20220916 1,167.90 CHECK 476413 TOTAL: 2,239.88 476414 09/16/2022 PRTD 136716 SIR LINES-A-LOT LLC PL22-1139-001 08/17/2022 20220916 983.00 CHECK 476414 TOTAL: 983.00 476415 09/16/2022 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 122548162-001 08/18/2022 20220916 53.17 CHECK 476415 TOTAL: 53.17 476416 09/16/2022 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN56011 08/30/2022 20220916 230.36 SMALL LOT MN MN56013 08/30/2022 20220916 328.08 CHECK 476416 TOTAL: 558.44 476417 09/16/2022 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/54033293 08/16/2022 20220916 21.13 CHECK 476417 TOTAL: 21.13 476418 09/16/2022 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250039 08/24/2022 20220916 731.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250043 08/24/2022 20220916 3,477.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250040 08/24/2022 20220916 763.30 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250038 08/24/2022 20220916 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250041 08/24/2022 20220916 212.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250042 08/24/2022 20220916 .40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250052 08/24/2022 20220916 3,334.95 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250054 08/24/2022 20220916 969.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250050 08/24/2022 20220916 2,304.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250049 08/24/2022 20220916 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250053 08/24/2022 20220916 261.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250051 08/24/2022 20220916 596.23 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250055 08/25/2022 20220916 728.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250044 08/24/2022 20220916 670.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250046 08/24/2022 20220916 270.71 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250045 08/24/2022 20220916 1,319.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2250047 08/24/2022 20220916 2,774.52 CHECK 476418 TOTAL: 18,801.36 476419 09/16/2022 PRTD 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 221969 08/17/2022 20220916 320.00 CHECK 476419 TOTAL: 320.00 476420 09/16/2022 PRTD 160428 SPORTS UNLIMITED 07-22-2022 07/22/2022 20220916 1,540.00 CHECK 476420 TOTAL: 1,540.00 476421 09/16/2022 PRTD 101007 STAR TRIBUNE MEDIA INTERMEDIATE H I00429938-08262022 08/31/2022 20220916 3,666.66 CHECK 476421 TOTAL: 3,666.66 476422 09/16/2022 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 46901-A 08/24/2022 20220916 99.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 46907 08/24/2022 20220916 373.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 46903 08/24/2022 20220916 236.00 CHECK 476422 TOTAL: 708.00 476423 09/16/2022 PRTD 124029 STERICYCLE 8002237421 08/31/2022 20220916 250.28 CHECK 476423 TOTAL: 250.28 476424 09/16/2022 PRTD 102786 STOP STICK LTD 0025769-IN 08/16/2022 20220916 407.00 STOP STICK LTD 0025800-IN 08/18/2022 20220916 3,980.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476424 TOTAL: 4,387.00 476425 09/16/2022 PRTD 146040 STRAYER, JUSTIN 16697 08/24/2022 20220916 322.30 STRAYER, JUSTIN 16711 08/24/2022 20220916 209.00 CHECK 476425 TOTAL: 531.30 476426 09/16/2022 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 806490 08/18/2022 20220916 1,600.00 CHECK 476426 TOTAL: 1,600.00 476427 09/16/2022 PRTD 101019 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 08-18-2022 08/18/2022 20220916 2,585.00 CHECK 476427 TOTAL: 2,585.00 476428 09/16/2022 PRTD 151143 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 3063 08/24/2022 20220916 195.00 CHECK 476428 TOTAL: 195.00 476429 09/16/2022 PRTD 126924 CAN HOLDINGS INC 5701 08/19/2022 20220916 180.00 CHECK 476429 TOTAL: 180.00 476430 09/16/2022 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 36151474 08/11/2022 20220916 108.84 TAYLOR MADE 36145559 08/09/2022 20220916 713.83 TAYLOR MADE 36152527 08/12/2022 20220916 17.90 CHECK 476430 TOTAL: 840.57 476431 09/16/2022 PRTD 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 90900993 08/22/2022 20220916 401.70 CHECK 476431 TOTAL: 401.70 476432 09/16/2022 PRTD 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT R33367 08/22/2022 20220916 2,800.00 CHECK 476432 TOTAL: 2,800.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476433 09/16/2022 PRTD 160236 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC 1098051 08/19/2022 20220916 780.58 CHECK 476433 TOTAL: 780.58 476434 09/16/2022 PRTD 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 95217 08/22/2022 20220916 761.25 CHECK 476434 TOTAL: 761.25 476435 09/16/2022 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 52527 08/22/2022 20220916 82.50 CHECK 476435 TOTAL: 82.50 476436 09/16/2022 PRTD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 150-0063959-01 08/17/2022 20220916 125.99 CHECK 476436 TOTAL: 125.99 476437 09/16/2022 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-1960 08/24/2022 20220916 111.00 CHECK 476437 TOTAL: 111.00 476438 09/16/2022 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2058193 08/09/2022 20220916 225.86 CHECK 476438 TOTAL: 225.86 476439 09/16/2022 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009414 08/17/2022 20220916 69.45 VAN PAPER COMPANY 008134-01 08/18/2022 20220916 949.50 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009517 08/18/2022 20220916 34.98 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009518 08/18/2022 20220916 813.09 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009519 08/18/2022 20220916 91.44 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009520 08/18/2022 20220916 420.18 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009513 08/18/2022 20220916 13.94 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009514 08/18/2022 20220916 303.42 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009823 08/24/2022 20220916 280.25 VAN PAPER COMPANY 009836 08/24/2022 20220916 182.12 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476439 TOTAL: 3,158.37 476440 09/16/2022 PRTD 160036 VAULT HEALTH FL00522696 08/02/2022 20220916 116.70 CHECK 476440 TOTAL: 116.70 476441 09/16/2022 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 3495 08/25/2022 20220916 273.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 3496 08/25/2022 20220916 180.00 CHECK 476441 TOTAL: 453.00 476442 09/16/2022 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S006107102.001 08/16/2022 20220916 208.00 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S006106475.001 08/18/2022 20220916 1,162.80 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S006119159.001 08/22/2022 20220916 -1,162.80 CHECK 476442 TOTAL: 208.00 476443 09/16/2022 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0311279-IN 08/25/2022 20220916 145.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0311278-IN 08/25/2022 20220916 145.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0311277-IN 08/25/2022 20220916 127.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0311275-IN 08/25/2022 20220916 457.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0311276-IN 08/25/2022 20220916 132.00 CHECK 476443 TOTAL: 1,007.75 476444 09/16/2022 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 65500319 08/19/2022 20220916 1,418.76 CHECK 476444 TOTAL: 1,418.76 476445 09/16/2022 PRTD 143468 PORTAGE BREWING COMPANY 002723 08/25/2022 20220916 187.50 PORTAGE BREWING COMPANY 002722 08/25/2022 20220916 63.00 PORTAGE BREWING COMPANY 002721 08/25/2022 20220916 105.00 CHECK 476445 TOTAL: 355.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476446 09/16/2022 PRTD 132751 WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA 239511 08/19/2022 20220916 1,720.00 CHECK 476446 TOTAL: 1,720.00 476447 09/16/2022 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 8760395-2282-9 08/01/2022 20220916 471.81 CHECK 476447 TOTAL: 471.81 476448 09/16/2022 PRTD 130574 WATSON COMPANY 127863 08/18/2022 20220916 336.62 CHECK 476448 TOTAL: 336.62 476449 09/16/2022 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 212850 08/24/2022 20220916 1,242.67 WINE COMPANY 212852 08/24/2022 20220916 2,308.00 WINE COMPANY 212853 08/24/2022 20220916 204.00 WINE COMPANY 212851 08/24/2022 20220916 2,064.00 CHECK 476449 TOTAL: 5,818.67 476450 09/16/2022 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 232266 01 08/16/2022 20220916 12.79 CHECK 476450 TOTAL: 12.79 476451 09/16/2022 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3680 08/25/2022 20220916 131.40 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3683 08/25/2022 20220916 242.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3681 08/25/2022 20220916 176.40 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3682 08/25/2022 20220916 51.00 CHECK 476451 TOTAL: 600.90 476452 09/16/2022 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000211 08/18/2022 20220916 90.00 CHECK 476452 TOTAL: 90.00 476453 09/16/2022 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN000599906 07/01/2022 20220916 970.00 ZIEGLER INC CM000072684 07/06/2022 20220916 -1,515.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 13:05User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ZIEGLER INC IN000603439 07/06/2022 20220916 35.00 ZIEGLER INC IN000656923 08/19/2022 20220916 4,012.02 ZIEGLER INC CM000084485 09/03/2022 20220916 -67.70 CHECK 476453 TOTAL: 3,434.32 NUMBER OF CHECKS 226 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,204,587.94 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 226 1,204,587.94 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,204,587.94 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 15:58User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 50,326.085400 Edinborough Park 9,004.909999 Pooled Cash Fund 59,330.98 TOTAL 59,330.98 59,330.98 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/15/2022 15:58User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476454 09/16/2022 PRTD 134730 EXPLORE EDINA Jul 2022 Lodging Tax09/06/2022 20220915 59,330.98 CHECK 476454 TOTAL: 59,330.98 NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 59,330.98 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 1 59,330.98 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 59,330.98 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 39 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 142,317.322500 Conservation & Sustainability 21,169.682600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 39,882.762600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 2,400.004000 Capital Projects 9,543.634200 Equipment Replacement 37,386.384400 PIR Capital Projects 60,374.405100 Art Center 738.275200 Braemar Golf Course 8,552.435200 Braemar Golf Course 606.795300 Aquatic Center 20,704.105400 Edinborough Park 12,153.175500 Braemar Arena 2,144.975600 Braemar Field 19.085700 Centennial Lakes 3,052.765800 Liquor 167,039.325900 Utility Fund 131,659.295900 Utility Fund 28.765900 Utility Fund 33,042.696000 Risk Management 459,639.856100 Equipment Operations 26,259.976200 Information Technology 21,899.006300 Facilities Management 219.577100 PS Training Facility 301.857200 MN Task Force 1 3,743.859000 Payroll 460,168.029999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,665,047.91 TOTAL 1,665,047.91 1,665,047.91 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476455 09/23/2022 PRTD 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22208231 08/24/2022 20220923 349.00 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22208251 08/29/2022 20220923 1,706.33 CHECK 476455 TOTAL: 2,055.33 476456 09/23/2022 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 10311334 08/24/2022 20220923 71.60 CHECK 476456 TOTAL: 71.60 476457 09/23/2022 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 913894970 08/02/2022 20220923 717.90 ACUSHNET COMPANY 913904222 08/03/2022 20220923 61.10 ACUSHNET COMPANY 914096024 09/03/2022 20220923 174.09 ACUSHNET COMPANY 914115196 09/07/2022 20220923 -401.25 CHECK 476457 TOTAL: 551.84 476458 09/23/2022 PRTD 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 9129257767 08/23/2022 20220923 445.48 CHECK 476458 TOTAL: 445.48 476459 09/23/2022 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 199793 08/24/2022 20220923 274.37 CHECK 476459 TOTAL: 274.37 476460 09/23/2022 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VDP-XG3X-9LMK 08/23/2022 20220923 1,928.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MHG-NP33-199K 08/23/2022 20220923 24.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VDP-XG3X-DHPD 08/23/2022 20220923 214.48 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HDP-7TG7-3LT3 08/23/2022 20220923 16.10 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CYW-TXCR-7TH7 08/24/2022 20220923 24.07 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17PG-C13G-1PDW 08/24/2022 20220923 66.73 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LHN-LVRJ-1LRY 08/24/2022 20220923 45.17 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QYD-QTN6-1QLL 08/24/2022 20220923 229.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1F4L-66WH-43PT 08/24/2022 20220923 12.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19JC-VYF4-3J4K 08/25/2022 20220923 1,453.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19N4-NP34-6KXP 08/25/2022 20220923 62.36 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19JC-VYF4-7D3K 08/25/2022 20220923 59.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YHQ-XC3F-GNND 08/25/2022 20220923 36.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FCH-QKFN-QGQ9 08/26/2022 20220923 28.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19M6-6P3W-WDP6 08/26/2022 20220923 258.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19K7-K43T-6V77 08/26/2022 20220923 264.27 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T4G-NK7N-9CJF 08/26/2022 20220923 -39.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T4G-NK7N-K6PG 08/26/2022 20220923 69.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13QX-QT1T-1FFL 08/27/2022 20220923 181.13 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1R9C-HJNY-73LL 08/27/2022 20220923 58.27 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13QX-QT1T-VGGQ 08/28/2022 20220923 498.60 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WYM-JHTN-DJJ3 08/29/2022 20220923 23.62 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GCV-XGYG-CDDF 08/29/2022 20220923 15.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RDC-D3HC-DV39 09/16/2022 20220923 -36.99 CHECK 476460 TOTAL: 5,498.13 476461 09/23/2022 PRTD 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 108662 08/29/2022 20220923 748.00 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 108678 08/29/2022 20220923 860.20 CHECK 476461 TOTAL: 1,608.20 476462 09/23/2022 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500079333 08/23/2022 20220923 197.54 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500079412 08/23/2022 20220923 92.32 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500080387 08/24/2022 20220923 208.22 CHECK 476462 TOTAL: 498.08 476463 09/23/2022 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 789 09/01/2022 20220923 174.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476463 TOTAL: 174.00 476464 09/23/2022 PRTD 101718 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119994 08/25/2022 20220923 24.75 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380120039 08/25/2022 20220923 5.07 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380120051 08/25/2022 20220923 21.92 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119914 08/24/2022 20220923 15.84 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119821 08/24/2022 20220923 30.55 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380119739 08/23/2022 20220923 7.04 CHECK 476464 TOTAL: 105.17 476465 09/23/2022 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096317500 09/01/2022 20220923 92.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096332200 09/01/2022 20220923 431.20 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096331400 09/01/2022 20220923 183.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0105686700 09/01/2022 20220923 143.05 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096331600 09/01/2022 20220923 1,383.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0105683000 09/01/2022 20220923 49.77 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0096332300 09/01/2022 20220923 1,652.95 CHECK 476465 TOTAL: 3,935.77 476466 09/23/2022 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5091998 08/24/2022 20220923 468.00 CHECK 476466 TOTAL: 468.00 476467 09/23/2022 PRTD 141961 MIDAMERICAN ENERGY SERVICES LLC 11565360 08/24/2022 20220923 6,788.84 CHECK 476467 TOTAL: 6,788.84 476468 09/23/2022 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 19076 09/01/2022 20220923 376.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 19075 09/01/2022 20220923 502.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 19077 09/01/2022 20220923 376.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476468 TOTAL: 1,254.00 476469 09/23/2022 PRTD 104347 BLUUM OF MINNESOTA LLC 876995 08/26/2022 20220923 228.20 CHECK 476469 TOTAL: 228.20 476470 09/23/2022 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0295710 08/26/2022 20220923 940.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0296547 08/29/2022 20220923 14,631.98 CHECK 476470 TOTAL: 15,571.98 476471 09/23/2022 PRTD 101010 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 924822565 08/25/2022 20220923 234.40 CHECK 476471 TOTAL: 234.40 476472 09/23/2022 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84654617 08/23/2022 20220923 2,936.95 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84654618 08/23/2022 20220923 296.91 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84656759 08/24/2022 20220923 473.50 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84662663 08/29/2022 20220923 220.58 CHECK 476472 TOTAL: 3,927.94 476473 09/23/2022 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 189706 08/30/2022 20220923 1,570.50 BOURGET IMPORTS 189859 09/06/2022 20220923 1,311.75 BOURGET IMPORTS 189861 09/06/2022 20220923 734.50 CHECK 476473 TOTAL: 3,616.75 476474 09/23/2022 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P39910 08/24/2022 20220923 11.19 CHECK 476474 TOTAL: 11.19 476475 09/23/2022 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B307262 08/25/2022 20220923 6,472.76 CHECK 476475 TOTAL: 6,472.76 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476476 09/23/2022 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390403 08/24/2022 20220923 5,559.42 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345390378 08/24/2022 20220923 5,665.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345483016 08/31/2022 20220923 4,416.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345483017 08/31/2022 20220923 353.26 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345483015 08/31/2022 20220923 427.45 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345483014 08/31/2022 20220923 920.05 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345483013 08/31/2022 20220923 4,810.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345483012 08/31/2022 20220923 168.96 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 345482990 08/31/2022 20220923 1,655.31 CHECK 476476 TOTAL: 23,976.60 476477 09/23/2022 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345367670 08/23/2022 20220923 6,034.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345370881 08/23/2022 20220923 5,622.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464008 08/30/2022 20220923 7,377.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464058 08/31/2022 20220923 4,007.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464057 08/30/2022 20220923 190.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345464003 08/30/2022 20220923 99.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 361560491 08/29/2022 20220923 -13.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 361560493 08/29/2022 20220923 -12.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 361560489 08/29/2022 20220923 -12.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 361560488 08/29/2022 20220923 -12.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345561123 09/06/2022 20220923 8,873.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345561121 09/06/2022 20220923 392.05 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 345561122 09/06/2022 20220923 49.50 CHECK 476477 TOTAL: 32,595.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476478 09/23/2022 PRTD 160367 BSN SPORTS LLC 917981872 08/25/2022 20220923 312.12 CHECK 476478 TOTAL: 312.12 476479 09/23/2022 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1202066-1 08/25/2022 20220923 86.19 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1202565-1 08/26/2022 20220923 73.65 CHECK 476479 TOTAL: 159.84 476480 09/23/2022 PRTD 137691 BY THE YARD INC 155574 08/29/2022 20220923 831.10 CHECK 476480 TOTAL: 831.10 476481 09/23/2022 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 934945861 05/31/2022 20220923 234.96 CALLAWAY GOLF 935136132 06/29/2022 20220923 131.40 CALLAWAY GOLF 935149011 06/30/2022 20220923 262.80 CALLAWAY GOLF 935301107 08/01/2022 20220923 144.00 CALLAWAY GOLF 935311212 08/03/2022 20220923 259.20 CALLAWAY GOLF 935463105 09/08/2022 20220923 -306.00 CHECK 476481 TOTAL: 726.36 476482 09/23/2022 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2731771 08/30/2022 20220923 279.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2731772 08/30/2022 20220923 3,236.80 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 19600303 08/29/2022 20220923 -50.15 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734216 09/02/2022 20220923 5,656.85 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734215 09/02/2022 20220923 14.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734214 09/02/2022 20220923 14.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734213 09/02/2022 20220923 162.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734211 09/02/2022 20220923 1,335.90 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734366 09/06/2022 20220923 36.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2734699 09/06/2022 20220923 4,096.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476482 TOTAL: 14,781.65 476483 09/23/2022 PRTD 160505 CURTIS, DONTE 1172 08/17/2022 20220923 4,000.00 CHECK 476483 TOTAL: 4,000.00 476484 09/23/2022 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2557530 08/23/2022 20220923 1,585.35 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2558324 08/24/2022 20220923 1,027.75 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2559315 08/25/2022 20220923 953.50 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 631200 08/24/2022 20220923 143.23 CHECK 476484 TOTAL: 3,709.83 476485 09/23/2022 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV143437 08/26/2022 20220923 279.00 CHECK 476485 TOTAL: 279.00 476486 09/23/2022 PRTD 160160 CHRISTIANSON'S BUSINESS FURNITURE 6968-1-KR 08/25/2022 20220923 632.50 CHECK 476486 TOTAL: 632.50 476487 09/23/2022 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4129633136 08/29/2022 20220923 27.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4129633099 08/29/2022 20220923 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4129633027 08/29/2022 20220923 36.03 CINTAS CORPORATION 4129633052 08/29/2022 20220923 17.87 CINTAS CORPORATION 4129633084 08/29/2022 20220923 26.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4129633992 08/29/2022 20220923 154.66 CINTAS CORPORATION 4125057021 07/12/2022 20220923 26.88 CHECK 476487 TOTAL: 301.75 476488 09/23/2022 PRTD 143586 CITIES 1 PLUMBING AND HEATING 125490 07/01/2022 20220923 542.50 CHECK 476488 TOTAL: 542.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476489 09/23/2022 PRTD 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 431-0005.300-08/22 09/06/2022 20220923 30,125.31 CHECK 476489 TOTAL: 30,125.31 476490 09/23/2022 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009005027 08/24/2022 20220923 550.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009005026 08/24/2022 20220923 3,054.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009005029 08/24/2022 20220923 2,000.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009005084 08/24/2022 20220923 395.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009005122 08/29/2022 20220923 5,700.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009005125 08/29/2022 20220923 2,900.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009004350 06/09/2022 20220923 500.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009004864 07/28/2022 20220923 3,600.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009004865 07/28/2022 20220923 5,800.00 CHECK 476490 TOTAL: 24,499.00 476491 09/23/2022 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0540232-09/22 09/08/2022 20220923 95.96 CHECK 476491 TOTAL: 95.96 476492 09/23/2022 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0007539-09/22 09/08/2022 20220923 915.40 CHECK 476492 TOTAL: 915.40 476493 09/23/2022 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103629809 08/29/2022 20220923 2,829.00 CHECK 476493 TOTAL: 2,829.00 476494 09/23/2022 PRTD 101403 CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING INC LC00078772 08/24/2022 20220923 450.55 CHECK 476494 TOTAL: 450.55 476495 09/23/2022 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X87611105 08/31/2022 20220923 706.00 CHECK 476495 TOTAL: 706.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476496 09/23/2022 PRTD 127913 CUTTER SALES 159603 08/25/2022 20220923 92.14 CHECK 476496 TOTAL: 92.14 476497 09/23/2022 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3977333 08/29/2022 20220923 547.26 CHECK 476497 TOTAL: 547.26 476498 09/23/2022 PRTD 140090 DDA HUMAN RESOURCES INC 00000472 08/24/2022 20220923 4,750.00 CHECK 476498 TOTAL: 4,750.00 476499 09/23/2022 PRTD 100726 STEVEN BECKMAN CORPORATION D000027002 08/26/2022 20220923 228.10 CHECK 476499 TOTAL: 228.10 476500 09/23/2022 PRTD 129079 DRAIN KING INC 114163 08/11/2022 20220923 962.50 CHECK 476500 TOTAL: 962.50 476501 09/23/2022 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 908244 08/25/2022 20220923 107.10 CHECK 476501 TOTAL: 107.10 476502 09/23/2022 PRTD 144120 ELEVE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER SESSION 2 NOV-DEC 01/13/2020 20220923 225.00 CHECK 476502 TOTAL: 225.00 476503 09/23/2022 PRTD 160506 T ELIOT PRESS LLC 510 08/29/2022 20220923 117.00 CHECK 476503 TOTAL: 117.00 476504 09/23/2022 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2473808 08/24/2022 20220923 76.69 CHECK 476504 TOTAL: 76.69 476505 09/23/2022 PRTD 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC 057329 08/26/2022 20220923 172.50 CHECK 476505 TOTAL: 172.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476506 09/23/2022 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-460563 08/24/2022 20220923 118.74 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-460465 08/23/2022 20220923 122.09 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-460680 08/25/2022 20220923 48.15 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7920786 08/25/2022 20220923 88.00 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7921544 08/25/2022 20220923 291.98 CHECK 476506 TOTAL: 668.96 476507 09/23/2022 PRTD 160292 FORECAST PUBLIC ARTWORKS 2040 02/28/2022 20220923 2,400.00 FORECAST PUBLIC ARTWORKS 1958 10/31/2021 20220923 600.00 CHECK 476507 TOTAL: 3,000.00 476508 09/23/2022 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1693817 08/24/2022 20220923 137.86 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1695794 08/26/2022 20220923 354.65 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1697287 08/29/2022 20220923 77.50 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1697189 08/29/2022 20220923 67.80 CHECK 476508 TOTAL: 637.81 476509 09/23/2022 PRTD 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LL 221022 08/24/2022 20220923 1,674.04 CHECK 476509 TOTAL: 1,674.04 476510 09/23/2022 PRTD 100781 MJ DONOVAN ENTERPRISES INC 146540 08/29/2022 20220923 860.00 CHECK 476510 TOTAL: 860.00 476511 09/23/2022 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9424366111 08/25/2022 20220923 25.36 CHECK 476511 TOTAL: 25.36 476512 09/23/2022 PRTD 100788 H & L MESABI COMPANY 10487 08/26/2022 20220923 5,988.00 CHECK 476512 TOTAL: 5,988.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476513 09/23/2022 PRTD 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC 2-292334 08/26/2022 20220923 169.99 CHECK 476513 TOTAL: 169.99 476514 09/23/2022 PRTD 121133 NATUS CORPORATION INC CG223381 08/24/2022 20220923 2,439.00 CHECK 476514 TOTAL: 2,439.00 476515 09/23/2022 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 231555 08/09/2022 20220923 21,169.68 CHECK 476515 TOTAL: 21,169.68 476516 09/23/2022 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 2423 08/28/2022 20220923 136.00 CHECK 476516 TOTAL: 136.00 476517 09/23/2022 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6273904 08/24/2022 20220923 10,057.22 HAWKINS INC 6279290 08/29/2022 20220923 8,029.42 CHECK 476517 TOTAL: 18,086.64 476518 09/23/2022 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0240701 08/23/2022 20220923 7,600.00 CHECK 476518 TOTAL: 7,600.00 476519 09/23/2022 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-3924 08/30/2022 20220923 126.00 CHECK 476519 TOTAL: 126.00 476520 09/23/2022 PRTD 122093 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 114756967 09/01/2022 20220923 24,282.85 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 114781766 09/01/2022 20220923 421,213.72 CHECK 476520 TOTAL: 445,496.57 476521 09/23/2022 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000189229 07/08/2022 20220923 15,000.00 CHECK 476521 TOTAL: 15,000.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476522 09/23/2022 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 535932 08/30/2022 20220923 1,319.65 HOHENSTEINS INC 535931 08/30/2022 20220923 76.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 538421 09/06/2022 20220923 1,002.90 HOHENSTEINS INC 538422 09/06/2022 20220923 240.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 538424 09/06/2022 20220923 103.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 538423 09/06/2022 20220923 2,579.25 CHECK 476522 TOTAL: 5,321.80 476523 09/23/2022 PRTD 151094 HOPKINS SPORTS CAMPS LLC 20640 08/10/2022 20220923 2,662.00 HOPKINS SPORTS CAMPS LLC 20639 07/26/2022 20220923 1,306.00 CHECK 476523 TOTAL: 3,968.00 476524 09/23/2022 PRTD 116680 HP INC 9016617111 08/25/2022 20220923 2,269.13 HP INC 9016617112 08/25/2022 20220923 6,020.64 HP INC 9016624466 08/27/2022 20220923 6,201.25 CHECK 476524 TOTAL: 14,491.02 476525 09/23/2022 PRTD 120085 IDEAL SERVICE 11976 08/29/2022 20220923 945.00 CHECK 476525 TOTAL: 945.00 476526 09/23/2022 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 602372 08/26/2022 20220923 400.00 CHECK 476526 TOTAL: 400.00 476527 09/23/2022 PRTD 100828 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 70324 08/25/2022 20220923 240.00 CHECK 476527 TOTAL: 240.00 476528 09/23/2022 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC PARKS-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220923 174.70 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC UTILITIES-08/2022 08/25/2022 20220923 176.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476528 TOTAL: 351.08 476529 09/23/2022 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208320 08/25/2022 20220923 65.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208319 08/25/2022 20220923 73.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208318 08/25/2022 20220923 73.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208317 08/25/2022 20220923 123.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208316 08/25/2022 20220923 73.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208315 08/25/2022 20220923 73.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208314 08/25/2022 20220923 73.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208407 08/25/2022 20220923 89.25 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC MP208408 08/25/2022 20220923 89.25 CHECK 476529 TOTAL: 731.50 476530 09/23/2022 PRTD 137507 JL THEIS INC 3264 09/13/2022 20220923 13,580.00 CHECK 476530 TOTAL: 13,580.00 476531 09/23/2022 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3557370 08/31/2022 20220923 866.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3557788 08/31/2022 20220923 110.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3557376 08/31/2022 20220923 1,623.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3557789 09/01/2022 20220923 110.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3557375 08/31/2022 20220923 2,139.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3557790 09/01/2022 20220923 110.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 341083 08/23/2022 20220923 -135.40 CHECK 476531 TOTAL: 4,826.60 476532 09/23/2022 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455398 09/01/2022 20220923 672.54 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455399 09/01/2022 20220923 65.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455400 09/01/2022 20220923 610.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455407 09/01/2022 20220923 144.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455406 09/01/2022 20220923 953.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455408 09/01/2022 20220923 688.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455405 09/01/2022 20220923 366.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6455409 09/01/2022 20220923 614.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6456836 09/02/2022 20220923 688.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6456835 09/02/2022 20220923 1,192.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6456833 09/02/2022 20220923 118.35 CHECK 476532 TOTAL: 6,115.80 476533 09/23/2022 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7393934 09/01/2022 20220923 897.55 WINE MERCHANTS 7393935 09/01/2022 20220923 490.08 WINE MERCHANTS 7393939 09/01/2022 20220923 1,166.80 WINE MERCHANTS 7393938 09/01/2022 20220923 1,337.45 WINE MERCHANTS 7394264 09/02/2022 20220923 1,094.80 WINE MERCHANTS 7394263 09/02/2022 20220923 953.06 CHECK 476533 TOTAL: 5,939.74 476534 09/23/2022 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127929 09/01/2022 20220923 958.34 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127930 09/01/2022 20220923 372.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127931 09/01/2022 20220923 1,421.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127932 09/01/2022 20220923 2,941.55 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127933 09/01/2022 20220923 1,543.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127934 09/01/2022 20220923 656.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127935 09/01/2022 20220923 248.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127936 09/01/2022 20220923 65.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127937 09/01/2022 20220923 195.43 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127938 09/01/2022 20220923 81.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127939 09/01/2022 20220923 268.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127959 09/01/2022 20220923 625.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127957 09/01/2022 20220923 378.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127956 09/01/2022 20220923 1,342.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127955 09/01/2022 20220923 1,265.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127954 09/01/2022 20220923 2,050.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127951 09/01/2022 20220923 1,614.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127953 09/01/2022 20220923 957.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127952 09/01/2022 20220923 1,532.54 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127960 09/01/2022 20220923 1,588.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127950 09/01/2022 20220923 2,380.01 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129897 09/02/2022 20220923 1,161.55 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129896 09/02/2022 20220923 134.12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129898 09/02/2022 20220923 273.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129893 09/02/2022 20220923 3,117.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129895 09/02/2022 20220923 2,233.22 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129892 09/02/2022 20220923 1,806.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2129894 09/02/2022 20220923 1,633.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2122515 08/25/2022 20220923 1,162.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2127958 09/06/2022 20220923 204.70 CHECK 476534 TOTAL: 34,215.21 476535 09/23/2022 PRTD 142504 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROTECTION 23119929 09/01/2022 20220923 419.35 CHECK 476535 TOTAL: 419.35 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476536 09/23/2022 PRTD 145396 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 004596 08/24/2022 20220923 106.00 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 004626 08/31/2022 20220923 152.00 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 004624 08/31/2022 20220923 218.00 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 004625 08/31/2022 20220923 152.00 CHECK 476536 TOTAL: 628.00 476537 09/23/2022 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2805613 08/27/2022 20220923 75.60 KELBRO COMPANY 2806550 09/01/2022 20220923 67.55 KELBRO COMPANY 2806464 09/01/2022 20220923 148.20 KELBRO COMPANY 2806549 09/01/2022 20220923 129.95 KELBRO COMPANY 2808099 09/03/2022 20220923 124.00 KELBRO COMPANY 2808102 09/06/2022 20220923 102.50 CHECK 476537 TOTAL: 647.80 476538 09/23/2022 PRTD 142207 KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY INC IN197666 08/25/2022 20220923 2,365.00 CHECK 476538 TOTAL: 2,365.00 476539 09/23/2022 PRTD 160105 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. W18804-1 08/24/2022 20220923 6,127.50 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. W18804-2 08/24/2022 20220923 415.58 CHECK 476539 TOTAL: 6,543.08 476540 09/23/2022 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 176231 08/31/2022 20220923 614.70 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 176212 08/31/2022 20220923 1,132.50 CHECK 476540 TOTAL: 1,747.20 476541 09/23/2022 PRTD 116776 JASPERSEN ENTERPRISES INC 88514 08/11/2022 20220923 115.00 JASPERSEN ENTERPRISES INC 88534 08/22/2022 20220923 94.00 JASPERSEN ENTERPRISES INC 89976 08/23/2022 20220923 97.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476541 TOTAL: 306.00 476542 09/23/2022 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 5810 08/31/2022 20220923 114.00 CHECK 476542 TOTAL: 114.00 476543 09/23/2022 PRTD 139451 LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL INC 1345 08/24/2022 20220923 400.00 CHECK 476543 TOTAL: 400.00 476544 09/23/2022 PRTD 138280 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 08-25-2022 08/25/2022 20220923 120.00 CHECK 476544 TOTAL: 120.00 476545 09/23/2022 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9309881365 08/29/2022 20220923 139.66 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9309883312 08/29/2022 20220923 1,433.13 CHECK 476545 TOTAL: 1,572.79 476546 09/23/2022 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 7484 08/29/2022 20220923 6,575.00 CHECK 476546 TOTAL: 6,575.00 476547 09/23/2022 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 40002474-09/22 09/06/2022 20220923 173,916.00 CHECK 476547 TOTAL: 173,916.00 476548 09/23/2022 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 40002968-09/22 09/06/2022 20220923 254,866.00 CHECK 476548 TOTAL: 254,866.00 476549 09/23/2022 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 48858 08/30/2022 20220923 572.00 LIBATION PROJECT 49036 09/06/2022 20220923 390.00 LIBATION PROJECT 49035 09/06/2022 20220923 302.00 CHECK 476549 TOTAL: 1,264.00 476550 09/23/2022 PRTD 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH A AUG 2022 09/19/2022 20220923 3,066.18 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476550 TOTAL: 3,066.18 476551 09/23/2022 PRTD 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH A SEPT 2022 09/19/2022 20220923 3,007.87 CHECK 476551 TOTAL: 3,007.87 476552 09/23/2022 PRTD 160486 LOCALITY MEDIA INC 2486 08/29/2022 20220923 12,200.00 CHECK 476552 TOTAL: 12,200.00 476553 09/23/2022 PRTD 139627 TOM LOUCKS & ASSOCIATES INC 42688 08/24/2022 20220923 32,810.00 CHECK 476553 TOTAL: 32,810.00 476554 09/23/2022 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 47243 08/31/2022 20220923 258.00 CHECK 476554 TOTAL: 258.00 476555 09/23/2022 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P03213 08/23/2022 20220923 529.60 CHECK 476555 TOTAL: 529.60 476556 09/23/2022 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 23550678 08/29/2022 20220923 11,763.46 CHECK 476556 TOTAL: 11,763.46 476557 09/23/2022 PRTD 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0026216791 08/25/2022 20220923 196.60 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0026216773 08/25/2022 20220923 425.03 CHECK 476557 TOTAL: 621.63 476558 09/23/2022 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV830181 08/30/2022 20220923 220.02 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV830194 08/30/2022 20220923 299.52 CHECK 476558 TOTAL: 519.54 476559 09/23/2022 PRTD 101267 MBPTA 2022 FALL WORKSHOP 09/14/2022 20220923 100.00 CHECK 476559 TOTAL: 100.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476560 09/23/2022 PRTD 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCI 200008930 07/06/2022 20220923 44.00 CHECK 476560 TOTAL: 44.00 476561 09/23/2022 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 648670 08/31/2022 20220923 486.80 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 648678 08/31/2022 20220923 114.50 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 648677 08/31/2022 20220923 76.50 CHECK 476561 TOTAL: 677.80 476562 09/23/2022 PRTD 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 09-08-2022 08/29/2022 20220923 2,494.00 CHECK 476562 TOTAL: 2,494.00 476563 09/23/2022 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 67521 08/23/2022 20220923 337.10 MENARDS 67609 08/24/2022 20220923 28.76 MENARDS 67619 08/24/2022 20220923 19.99 MENARDS 67607 08/24/2022 20220923 62.08 MENARDS 67588 08/24/2022 20220923 26.68 MENARDS 67668 08/25/2022 20220923 14.98 MENARDS 67870 08/29/2022 20220923 22.32 CHECK 476563 TOTAL: 511.91 476564 09/23/2022 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 528564 08/25/2022 20220923 724.68 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 529162 08/19/2022 20220923 6.55 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC CM528987 09/09/2022 20220923 -118.96 CHECK 476564 TOTAL: 612.27 476565 09/23/2022 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 732174 08/23/2022 20220923 451.71 CHECK 476565 TOTAL: 451.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476566 09/23/2022 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-34133 08/29/2022 20220923 546.00 CHECK 476566 TOTAL: 546.00 476567 09/23/2022 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1360258-00 08/23/2022 20220923 377.01 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1360267-01 08/23/2022 20220923 16.26 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1360267-00 08/23/2022 20220923 16.26 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1360743-00 08/23/2022 20220923 53.15 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1361204-00 08/25/2022 20220923 400.50 CHECK 476567 TOTAL: 863.18 476568 09/23/2022 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 3599-179602 08/24/2022 20220923 186.52 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 3599-179867 08/26/2022 20220923 122.20 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-867295 08/24/2022 20220923 19.92 CHECK 476568 TOTAL: 328.64 476569 09/23/2022 PRTD 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 677050 08/25/2022 20220923 1,499.40 CHECK 476569 TOTAL: 1,499.40 476570 09/23/2022 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 192280 08/31/2022 20220923 827.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 192284 08/31/2022 20220923 363.50 CHECK 476570 TOTAL: 1,190.50 476571 09/23/2022 PRTD 104350 NIKE USA INC 9659625477 08/01/2022 20220923 153.13 NIKE USA INC 9659871827 08/02/2022 20220923 69.36 CHECK 476571 TOTAL: 222.49 476572 09/23/2022 PRTD 125089 NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP INC 123116 08/27/2022 20220923 149.95 CHECK 476572 TOTAL: 149.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476573 09/23/2022 PRTD 101620 GARELICK STEEL CO INC 518712 08/29/2022 20220923 655.95 CHECK 476573 TOTAL: 655.95 476574 09/23/2022 PRTD 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 518476 08/24/2022 20220923 296.45 CHECK 476574 TOTAL: 296.45 476575 09/23/2022 PRTD 160385 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 263730750001 08/26/2022 20220923 209.99 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 264843214001 09/01/2022 20220923 -209.99 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 263007543001 08/23/2022 20220923 209.99 CHECK 476575 TOTAL: 209.99 476576 09/23/2022 PRTD 126729 OMANN BROTHERS PAVING INC 16354 08/25/2022 20220923 9,982.17 CHECK 476576 TOTAL: 9,982.17 476577 09/23/2022 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-12573 08/31/2022 20220923 138.00 CHECK 476577 TOTAL: 138.00 476578 09/23/2022 PRTD 999998 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 03/02/2020 20220923 75.50 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 2 03/02/2020 20220923 75.50 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 3 03/02/2020 20220923 138.76 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 4 03/02/2020 20220923 61.16 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 5 04/08/2020 20220923 23.43 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 6 04/09/2020 20220923 12.25 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 7 05/13/2019 20220923 72.21 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 8 04/08/2020 20220923 135.69 UCARE SMEETA ANTONY 9 04/08/2020 20220923 148.84 CHECK 476578 TOTAL: 743.34 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476579 09/23/2022 PRTD 999998 GNAZZO, MAXINE 273-22-2775 09/13/2022 20220923 1,280.80 CHECK 476579 TOTAL: 1,280.80 476580 09/23/2022 PRTD 999994 Foxwell ED199757-REFUND 09/19/2022 20220923 2,037.60 CHECK 476580 TOTAL: 2,037.60 476581 09/23/2022 PRTD 999994 MAAO Region IX Edina2022 08/18/2022 20220923 20.00 CHECK 476581 TOTAL: 20.00 476582 09/23/2022 PRTD 999994 Sedgwick Heating & AC ED200244-REFUND 09/15/2022 20220923 63.27 CHECK 476582 TOTAL: 63.27 476583 09/23/2022 PRTD 999994 T. Scherber Demo & Excavating 70276272-952292963 09/12/2022 20220923 1,710.00 CHECK 476583 TOTAL: 1,710.00 476584 09/23/2022 PRTD 999996 Teitscheid, Amy PARK & REC REFUND 02/12/2021 20220923 65.00 CHECK 476584 TOTAL: 65.00 476585 09/23/2022 PRTD 999993 Fulton, Laura ART-09/06/22 09/06/2022 20220923 434.81 CHECK 476585 TOTAL: 434.81 476586 09/23/2022 PRTD 999997 FOLCZYK, GRETCHEN LOCKBOX REFUND 10/30/2020 20220923 189.50 CHECK 476586 TOTAL: 189.50 476587 09/23/2022 PRTD 999997 KORMAN, MICHAEL 0111505005 07/13/2018 20220923 29.47 CHECK 476587 TOTAL: 29.47 476588 09/23/2022 PRTD 999997 TAVENAS, SEBASTIEN 00121609-0201282003 02/12/2021 20220923 31.99 CHECK 476588 TOTAL: 31.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476589 09/23/2022 PRTD 999997 Gamradt, Barbara 00113428-9/20/2022 09/20/2022 20220923 119.73 CHECK 476589 TOTAL: 119.73 476590 09/23/2022 PRTD 999997 MARK PROPERTIES LLC 00126176-01/11/21 01/22/2021 20220923 34.30 CHECK 476590 TOTAL: 34.30 476591 09/23/2022 PRTD 999997 WAKEFIELD,TODD 00105917-01/11/21 01/22/2021 20220923 199.16 CHECK 476591 TOTAL: 199.16 476592 09/23/2022 PRTD 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC 46922 07/20/2018 20220923 36.96 CHECK 476592 TOTAL: 36.96 476593 09/23/2022 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-160051 09/01/2022 20220923 35.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-160050 09/01/2022 20220923 272.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-160048 09/01/2022 20220923 257.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-160049 09/01/2022 20220923 216.00 CHECK 476593 TOTAL: 781.00 476594 09/23/2022 PRTD 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 200583 08/24/2022 20220923 105.74 CHECK 476594 TOTAL: 105.74 476595 09/23/2022 PRTD 100119 PING INC 16480195 08/08/2022 20220923 61.31 PING INC 16488519 08/12/2022 20220923 219.12 PING INC 16514810 08/31/2022 20220923 -191.44 CHECK 476595 TOTAL: 88.99 476596 09/23/2022 PRTD 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL COMPANY 01CN9342 08/24/2022 20220923 3.21 CHECK 476596 TOTAL: 3.21 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476597 09/23/2022 PRTD 145866 PLATINUM DANCE CENTER LLC 1086 08/29/2022 20220923 1,813.00 CHECK 476597 TOTAL: 1,813.00 476598 09/23/2022 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7695332 08/25/2022 20220923 68.77 CHECK 476598 TOTAL: 68.77 476599 09/23/2022 PRTD 120988 DAHLMAN, EMMA 419248 09/19/2022 20220923 475.00 CHECK 476599 TOTAL: 475.00 476600 09/23/2022 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 160041 08/26/2022 20220923 381.68 SCHENCK, DAVID 160051 08/26/2022 20220923 537.44 SCHENCK, DAVID 160052 08/26/2022 20220923 476.07 CHECK 476600 TOTAL: 1,395.19 476601 09/23/2022 PRTD 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH INC QLS23321 08/23/2022 20220923 5,259.67 CHECK 476601 TOTAL: 5,259.67 476602 09/23/2022 PRTD 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 2214881 06/14/2022 20220923 5,034.00 CHECK 476602 TOTAL: 5,034.00 476603 09/23/2022 PRTD 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC 500274533/200439542408/24/2022 20220923 492.00 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC 2004395440 08/29/2022 20220923 180.00 CHECK 476603 TOTAL: 672.00 476604 09/23/2022 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 229985725 08/23/2022 20220923 32.10 CHECK 476604 TOTAL: 32.10 476605 09/23/2022 PRTD 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 0000055218 08/23/2022 20220923 68.18 CHECK 476605 TOTAL: 68.18 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476606 09/23/2022 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC ENG 22-2 #1 09/07/2022 20220923 102,007.10 CHECK 476606 TOTAL: 102,007.10 476607 09/23/2022 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC R002858485 08/27/2022 20220923 124.21 CHECK 476607 TOTAL: 124.21 476608 09/23/2022 PRTD 100991 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE SVC-200948 08/24/2022 20220923 997.92 CHECK 476608 TOTAL: 997.92 476609 09/23/2022 PRTD 160513 SEASONAL CHORES INC QB9411 08/04/2022 20220923 110.00 CHECK 476609 TOTAL: 110.00 476610 09/23/2022 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 17511 08/24/2022 20220923 235.00 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 17500 08/24/2022 20220923 127.25 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 17508 08/24/2022 20220923 54.76 CHECK 476610 TOTAL: 417.01 476611 09/23/2022 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 122817150-001 08/26/2022 20220923 202.00 CHECK 476611 TOTAL: 202.00 476612 09/23/2022 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN56016 08/30/2022 20220923 136.46 CHECK 476612 TOTAL: 136.46 476613 09/23/2022 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253157 08/31/2022 20220923 65.45 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253159 08/31/2022 20220923 2,243.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253156 08/31/2022 20220923 931.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253160 08/31/2022 20220923 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253158 08/31/2022 20220923 178.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253169 08/31/2022 20220923 1,343.09 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253170 08/31/2022 20220923 228.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253167 08/31/2022 20220923 424.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253171 08/31/2022 20220923 144.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2253168 08/31/2022 20220923 96.80 CHECK 476613 TOTAL: 5,751.74 476614 09/23/2022 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4685154.001 08/24/2022 20220923 430.16 CHECK 476614 TOTAL: 430.16 476615 09/23/2022 PRTD 160346 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY AUG 2022 09/19/2022 20220923 8,111.10 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY SEPT 2022 09/19/2022 20220923 8,211.25 CHECK 476615 TOTAL: 16,322.35 476616 09/23/2022 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1270011-Q3-2022 08/16/2022 20220923 34,977.00 CHECK 476616 TOTAL: 34,977.00 476617 09/23/2022 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA STATE FOREST NURSERY PS-INV104700 08/31/2022 20220923 280.00 CHECK 476617 TOTAL: 280.00 476618 09/23/2022 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 47013 08/31/2022 20220923 386.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 47016 08/31/2022 20220923 301.00 CHECK 476618 TOTAL: 687.00 476619 09/23/2022 PRTD 124029 STERICYCLE 8002238878 08/31/2022 20220923 586.52 CHECK 476619 TOTAL: 586.52 476620 09/23/2022 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1585354 08/18/2022 20220923 354.00 CHECK 476620 TOTAL: 354.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476621 09/23/2022 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10188698 08/24/2022 20220923 104.00 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10188720 08/25/2022 20220923 1,124.34 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10188697 08/24/2022 20220923 591.56 CHECK 476621 TOTAL: 1,819.90 476622 09/23/2022 PRTD 133512 SUDDATH RELOCATION SYSTEMS OF MIN 758861 08/12/2022 20220923 1,590.00 SUDDATH RELOCATION SYSTEMS OF MIN 758845 08/12/2022 20220923 1,590.00 CHECK 476622 TOTAL: 3,180.00 476623 09/23/2022 PRTD 135803 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN AUG 2022 #1 09/19/2022 20220923 5,232.65 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN SEPT 2022 #1 09/19/2022 20220923 5,283.97 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN AUG 2022 #2 09/19/2022 20220923 3,020.64 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN SEPT 2022 #2 09/19/2022 20220923 3,020.64 CHECK 476623 TOTAL: 16,557.90 476624 09/23/2022 PRTD 160502 SUNSET LAW ENFORCEME LLC 0007069-IN 08/26/2022 20220923 7,174.40 CHECK 476624 TOTAL: 7,174.40 476625 09/23/2022 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 36165304 08/23/2022 20220923 8.40 TAYLOR MADE 36054393 06/27/2022 20220923 431.52 CHECK 476625 TOTAL: 439.92 476626 09/23/2022 PRTD 150844 TENVOORDE FORD INC INV26059 08/03/2022 22100012 20220923 37,386.38 CHECK 476626 TOTAL: 37,386.38 476627 09/23/2022 PRTD 146870 TERRY'S HARDWARE 319538/1 08/25/2022 20220923 3,743.85 CHECK 476627 TOTAL: 3,743.85 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476628 09/23/2022 PRTD 129923 CONTEMPORARY INC V875498 08/26/2022 20220923 23.67 CHECK 476628 TOTAL: 23.67 476629 09/23/2022 PRTD 160503 TL STEVENS WELL COMPANY INC 13791 08/29/2022 20220923 1,491.50 CHECK 476629 TOTAL: 1,491.50 476630 09/23/2022 PRTD 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 138061 08/24/2022 20220923 330.00 CHECK 476630 TOTAL: 330.00 476631 09/23/2022 PRTD 160236 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC 1307365 08/25/2022 20220923 780.58 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC 1098171 08/22/2022 20220923 780.58 CHECK 476631 TOTAL: 1,561.16 476632 09/23/2022 PRTD 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 95232 08/23/2022 20220923 30.00 CHECK 476632 TOTAL: 30.00 476633 09/23/2022 PRTD 150991 UAV PUBLIC SAFETY INC 1269 08/25/2022 20220923 350.00 CHECK 476633 TOTAL: 350.00 476634 09/23/2022 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-1981 09/01/2022 20220923 148.00 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-1982 09/01/2022 20220923 74.00 CHECK 476634 TOTAL: 222.00 476635 09/23/2022 PRTD 160436 BENJAMIN HUGUS E-2707 09/06/2022 20220923 249.00 BENJAMIN HUGUS E-2706 09/06/2022 20220923 281.16 CHECK 476635 TOTAL: 530.16 476636 09/23/2022 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 010908 08/31/2022 20220923 586.86 CHECK 476636 TOTAL: 586.86 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476637 09/23/2022 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 87508 08/29/2022 20220923 518.62 CHECK 476637 TOTAL: 518.62 476638 09/23/2022 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S006135937.001 08/24/2022 20220923 628.92 CHECK 476638 TOTAL: 628.92 476639 09/23/2022 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0311785-IN 09/01/2022 20220923 900.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0311784-IN 09/01/2022 20220923 113.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0311781-IN 09/01/2022 20220923 1,457.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0311780-IN 09/01/2022 20220923 1,319.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0311783-IN 09/01/2022 20220923 127.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0311782-IN 09/01/2022 20220923 1,082.75 CHECK 476639 TOTAL: 5,000.75 476640 09/23/2022 PRTD 160301 VISION INC 118008 08/29/2022 20220923 1,099.84 CHECK 476640 TOTAL: 1,099.84 476641 09/23/2022 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 65578754 08/26/2022 20220923 561.88 CHECK 476641 TOTAL: 561.88 476642 09/23/2022 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 0095832-2808-6 09/02/2022 20220923 6,533.14 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN ADJ-06/2022 06/16/2022 20220923 -5,121.40 CHECK 476642 TOTAL: 1,411.74 476643 09/23/2022 PRTD 135181 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 157492 08/24/2022 20220923 1,224.49 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 156920 08/23/2022 20220923 1,398.69 CHECK 476643 TOTAL: 2,623.18 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 476644 09/23/2022 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 213529 08/31/2022 20220923 1,704.00 WINE COMPANY 213532 08/31/2022 20220923 3,003.60 CHECK 476644 TOTAL: 4,707.60 476645 09/23/2022 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 232680 01 08/24/2022 20220923 67.30 CHECK 476645 TOTAL: 67.30 476646 09/23/2022 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3694 09/01/2022 20220923 301.80 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3692 09/01/2022 20220923 585.60 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3693 09/01/2022 20220923 51.00 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3691 09/01/2022 20220923 287.10 CHECK 476646 TOTAL: 1,225.50 476647 09/23/2022 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000214 08/25/2022 20220923 93.00 CHECK 476647 TOTAL: 93.00 476648 09/23/2022 PRTD 160454 WRIGHT LINE HOLDING INC 004148398 08/09/2022 20220923 215.75 WRIGHT LINE HOLDING INC 004148522 08/16/2022 20220923 416.51 WRIGHT LINE HOLDING INC 004148569 08/19/2022 20220923 520.92 WRIGHT LINE HOLDING INC 4148030 07/22/2022 20220923 8,213.03 CHECK 476648 TOTAL: 9,366.21 476649 09/23/2022 PRTD 100932 XCEL ENERGY 793311174 08/23/2022 20220923 60.21 XCEL ENERGY 791368515 08/09/2022 20220923 16,936.43 CHECK 476649 TOTAL: 16,996.64 476650 09/23/2022 PRTD 129312 YOUTH TECH INC 7389 07/14/2022 20220923 1,841.25 YOUTH TECH INC 7449 07/28/2022 20220923 1,912.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/22/2022 13:38User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 476650 TOTAL: 3,753.75 476651 09/23/2022 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN000665631 08/26/2022 20220923 352.08 ZIEGLER INC IN000665773 08/26/2022 20220923 57.70 CHECK 476651 TOTAL: 409.78 NUMBER OF CHECKS 197 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,665,047.91 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 197 1,665,047.91 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,665,047.91 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2022-08 & Resolution No. 2022-92 Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan, & Site Improvement Plan Agreement for Solhem Companies at 4600 and 4620 77th Street West Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Grant Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2022-08 and approve Resolution No. 2022-92, and Site Improvement Plan Agreement (SIPA). INTRODUCTION: The proposed plans are consistent with the approved preliminary plans. The applicant has satisfied all the conditions of preliminary approval. T he city attorney has drafted the SIPA and Easement Agreement, and the applicant is agreeable. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-92 Ordinance No. 2022-08 Final Plans Approved Preliminary Plans SIPA RESOLUTION NO. 2022-92 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT, AND FINAL REZONING FROM MDD-6, MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT-6 TO PUD-23, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 23, AT 4600 & 4620 77TH STREET WEST BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is proposing to tear down one of the existing two office buildings on the site and construct a 5-7 story, 276-unit apartment. 1.02 This site was rezoned to Mixed Development District – 6 (MDD-6) in 2008 as part of rezoning of all of Pentagon Park; however, no development ever took place. The MDD zoning designation was used before the City established PUD Zoning in 2011. There was to be a mixture of office and residential uses. The subject property was specifically contemplated for multi-family residential housing. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County Minn. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. A Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and 2. Final Site Plan. 1.05 On July 27, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests. 1.06 On August 16, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing. 1.07 On September 7, 2022, the City Council approved the request for Preliminary Rezoning, and Preliminary Development Plan. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Final approval is based on the following findings: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-92 Page 2 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential,” which allows for residential, and limited retail uses. The project would provide 28 units of affordable housing, meet the City’s sustainability policy, and provide significant upgrades to pedestrian, vehicular and bike connections to Fred Richards Park and the Regional Trail. Primary parking would be located under and within the building, which is pulled up closer to the street, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Sidewalks are provided all around the building including a significant connection to the regional bike trail. Since this project would be the second phase of the apartment project to the west an extension of the PUD-23 District is appropriate. The proposed buildings would be a high-quality brick, with metal siding. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council and ensures the buy-in funds to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City of Edina. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Stantec Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 5. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. The nearest single-family home to this site is 780 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building from the 7-story portion of the building to the nearest single-family lot line. The building would be 77 feet tall, therefore, a 308-foot setback is required. 6. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Improvement Plan Agreement, Final Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-23, Planned Unit Development District and Final Development Plan for 4600 & 4620 77th Street West subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 2. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-92 Page 3 4. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 6. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 7. Dedication of public access easements must be established over the north-south woonerf and new vehicular connection to Fred Richards Park and the east-west sidewalk along 77th Street. Dedication of the easement for the vehicular connection to Fred Richards Park must occur prior to issuance of any building permit. Maintenance of the north-south connections shall be the property owner’s responsibility. The City will maintain the sidewalk along 77th Street. The Maintenance of sidewalks internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. 8. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated July 11, 2022, including meeting the City’s sustainability policy, subject to review and approval of the City’s sustainability manager. 9. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 10. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment expanding the PUD-23, Planned Unit Development for this site. 11. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 13. The road access to the Fred Richards Park be designed to a maximum of 20 mph. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-92 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 6, 2022. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 6, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2022. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2022-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PUD-23, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-23, TO EXPAND THE DISTRICT ADDING 4600 77th STREET WEST The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-512. Planned Unit Development District-23 (PUD-23) – Pentagon Park Apartments (a) Legal description: Tract A and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218 Hennepin County Minnesota. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on April 22 and September 9, 2021, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-76 on file in the Office of the Planning Department; and Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, dated September 22, 2022, except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2022-92 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: Office & Medical Office Multifamily Residential Retail Uses allowed in the PCD-1 District (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: None 2 (f) Development Standards. Standard Building Setbacks Front – 77th Street Rear – Fred Richards Park Side – West Side – East 40--50 feet 20 feet 50 feet 45 feet Building Height 5-7 stories & 52-86 feet Density 75 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Free standing sign setback 550 spaces 1 space per 1.3 units for residential and all other uses subject to Section 36-1311 (Parking Regulations) 6 feet from the traveled portion of 77th Street West (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-1 Zoning District for the retail uses, POD, for office uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. Signs shown on the final development plans shall be allowed. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: September 7, 2022 Second Reading: October 6, 2022 Published: 3 ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 6, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2022. ________________________________ City Clerk WETLAND #10TYPE 2/PEMBWET MEADOW0.6 AC. DELINEATED500.00450.00500.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 NOPAR K I N G UPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREA825 NOPARKINGNOPARKING NOPARKINGNOPARKING NOPARKINGNOPARKING4620 APARTMENTS 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:2223908/31/22 CONCEPT SET09/22/22 FINAL REZONING APPLICATION. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c2022Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET. .. .. .. .. .. .4620 APARTMENTSEDINA, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNISSUED FOR: FINAL REZONING APPLICATIONDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422CONTACT: ROBBIE LATTA612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:C2.0 OVERALL - SITE PLANKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTBDL1.1RESIDENTIAL - LANDSCAPE PLANARCHITECT:MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP755 N PRIOR AVE N#301AST. PAUL, MN 55114CONTACT: CRAIG HARTMANCRAIG@MDGARCHITECTS.COM651-253-2981SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N FIRST STSUITE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: CURT GUNSBURYCURT@SOLHEM.COM612-216-2825OVERALL - GRADING PLANC3.0OVERALL - UTILITY PLANC4.0"THE FRED"CSG PROJECT 21105PHASE II RESIDENTIALPUBLIC STREETEXISTING BUILDINGS TO REMAINSUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY (I-35W)SUITE 118BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420CONTACT: LEONARD CARLSON952-881-2455 UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.35982361114144600 77th Street WExisting Building4570 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008P.I.D: 3102824340009Owner: Pentagon North LLCP.I.D: 3102824310058Owner: City of Edina450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous Surface Bituminous Surface Bituminous SurfaceStairs East Line Tract BDelineated Wetland Corners fall in waterNo Monuments Found or SetEdge of WaterUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 211057,700 SF PROPOSEDWETLAND BUFFER7,201 SF REQ'DLANDSCAPE PLANTING,SEE LANDSCAPE PLANMATCH EXISTINGASPHALTPAVEMENT, SEEGRADING PLANGRAVEL PAVEMENTFIRE ACCESS PATHLANDSCAPED AREA,SEE LANDSCAPEPLANCONCRETESIDEWALKCONCRETE WALKWAYB6-12 CURB, TYPSTOP SIGN, MUTCD R1-1,PAINTEDDIRECTIONALARROWS,TYPCONCRETE DRIVE APRONCONCRETE WALKWAYBITUMINOUS PED/BIKE PATHCOVERED CONCRETE WALKWAYMONUMENT SIGN, SEEARCH PLANSFACING NORTHONE WAY DO NOT ENTER SIGN,MUTCD R5-1FACING SOUTHEND ONE WAY SIGN, MUTCD R6-7BEGIN ONE WAY,MUTCD R6-6CONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSMONUMENT SIGN, SEEARCH PLANSH.D. BIT. PAVEMENT, SEEGEOTECH825NOPARKINGNOPARKING REMOVE EXISTINGDRIVEWAYSGRAVEL PAVEMENTFIRE ACCESS PATHGRAVEL PAVEMENTFIRE ACCESS PATHRETAINING WALL, FIELD BOULDERSBITUMINOUSBIKE/PED. PATHEND RIBBON CURB, BEGIN B6-12 CURBCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSW/ STOP LINEPLASTIC KNOCKDOWNBOLLARDS PLACED 4'ON CENTERPLASTIC KNOCKDOWNBOLLARDS PLACED 4'ON CENTERPAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, TYPPAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, TYPNEW B6-12 CURBPED. RAMP, TYPEXISTING TO REMAINBASKETBALL HOOPOUTCROPPING FIELD BOULDERSORNAMENTAL STEEL FENCE, MONTAGE 2, 4' HEIGHTCONCRETE STEPS WITH STEEL RAILINGOUTCROPPING FIELD BOULDERSOUTCROPPING FIELD BOULDERSCONCRETE WALKWAYRETAINING WALL, FIELD BOULDERS35.0'PROPOSED ROADWAYEASEMENT516811131315NOPARKING20' FRONT PARKING SETBACKCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKS44' ARIAL LADDERTRUCK ACCESSIBLECONCRETE WALKWAYCONCRETE WALKWAYCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSBOULDER WALL2 COMPACT ONLYSTALLSCONCRETESIDEWALK FROMBACK OF CURB TOPARKING LOTCONCRETESIDEWALK FROMBACK OF CURB TOPARKING LOTCONCRETESIDEWALK FROMBACK OF CURB TOPARKING LOTRIBBON CURB4 WAY STOPPED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.B6-12 CURBNOPARKING 4600 SITE PARKINGPROPOSED PARKING 117 (@9' WIDE STALLS)EXISTING PARKING 117 (@9'+/- STALLS)22' DRIVE LANENOPARKINGNOPARKINGACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSCONCRETE STAIRS & RAILINGBIT. PVMT.,TYPBIT.PVMT.,TYPBIT.PVMT.,TYPNEW FREDRICHARDS PARK/PPSIGNAGENEW CURB TO CITYSTANDARDSPATCH STREETSECTIONIN-KIND PERCITYSTANDARDSRESTRIPETO8.5'x18'PARKINGSTALLS &22' DRIVEAISLECONCRETESIDEWALK FROMBACK OF CURB TOPARKING LOTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS23.7'11.3'NEW 4600 PPSIGNAGEPED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.16204570 AFFECTED SITE PARKINGPROPOSED PARKING 61(@9' WIDE STALLS)EXISTING PARKING 65(@9'+/- STALLS)4 TEMP. PARKING STALLS IN PARK DRIVE ROWNORTH END22' DRIVE LANE4600 WEST SITE PARKINGPROPOSED PARKING 13 (@9' WIDE STALLS)EXISTING PARKING 14 (@9'+/- STALLS)51513151385ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSCONNECT TO NEWSTAIRS AND LIFTSTAIRS, LIFT, & LANDING - SEEARCH.CONCRETE SIDE WALKSTAIRS, LIFT, & LANDING - SEEARCH.4620 APARTMENTS 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2223908/31/22 CONCEPT SET09/22/22 FINAL REZONING APPLICATION. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c2022Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0 SITE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOSPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHINPRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAIL WETLAND #10TYPE 2/PEMBWET MEADOW0.6 AC. DELINEATEDUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 4 PER DOC.UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.35982361114144600 77th Street WExisting Building4570 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008P.I.D: 3102824340009Owner: Pentagon North LLCP.I.D: 3102824310058Owner: City of Edina7640 Parklawn AveP.I.D: 3102824310056Owner: Vil of EdinaUnassigned AddressS00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous Surface Bituminous Surface Bituminous SurfaceStairs East Line Tract BDelineated Wetland Delineated Wetland Corners fall in waterNo Monuments Found or SetEdge of WaterUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 211057,700 SF PROPOSEDWETLAND BUFFER7,201 SF REQ'D825NOPARKINGNOPARKING 35.0'PROPOSED ROADWAYEASEMENT6181882112141416NOPARKINGNOPARKING 14NOPARKINGNOPARKING5.8'+/-CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS23.7'11.3'4620 APARTMENTS 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:2223908/31/22 CONCEPT SET09/22/22 FINAL REZONING APPLICATION. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c2022Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0OVERALL - GRADINGPLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF EDINA GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WASOBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XXTHE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS:SB-1XXX.XXSB-2XXX.XXSB-3XXX.XXSB-4XXX.XXPROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XXSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS, (FFE, LFE, GFE), PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BY CROSS CHECKING WITHARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ELEVATIONS FOR EQUIVALENT "100" ELEVATIONS. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TOEXCAVATION AND INSTALLATION OF ANY FOOTING MATERIALS. VERIFICATION OF THIS COORDINATION SHALL BE CONFIRMED INWRITING BY CIVIL, SURVEYOR, ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.3.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOILCORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALLSOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.5.ANY ELEMENTS OF AN EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM AND RELATED EXCAVATIONS THAT FALL WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WILLREQUIRE A “RIGHT OF WAY EXCAVATION PERMIT”. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AQUIRING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONIF APPLICABLE6.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGEELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINEDAREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BEDESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TOESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADESACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITETO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED INEMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS,WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDINGADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS ORSLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVEBEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALLAREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREASDISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BEAT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILSENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADESOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW,THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION,UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH ANDDEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER,CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. WETLAND #10TYPE 2/PEMBWET MEADOW0.6 AC. DELINEATEDUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 4 PER DOC.UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.35982361114144600 77th Street WExisting Building4570 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008P.I.D: 3102824340009Owner: Pentagon North LLCP.I.D: 3102824310058Owner: City of Edina7640 Parklawn AveP.I.D: 3102824310056Owner: Vil of EdinaUnassigned Address450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous Surface Bituminous Surface Bituminous SurfaceStairs East Line Tract BDelineated Wetland Delineated Wetland Corners fall in waterNo Monuments Found or SetEdge of WaterPROPOSED UNDERGROUND WET POND120" AND 60" CMPSTONE BASE INVERT, 120"=813.65STONE BASE INVERT, 60"=818.65TOTAL FOOTPRINT=19'X192' (INCLUDES 12" SIDE AND END STONE)PERMANENT (DEAD) STORAGE=15,327 CFFLOOD (LIVE) STORAGE=9,928 CFWRAP SYSTEM WITH 40-MIL IMPERMEABLE LINER WITH SEALED SEAMS24" FESIE=820.00RAINWATER REUSE CISTERN120" DURAMAXX PIPEFOOTPRINT=45'X16.27'STONE BASE IE=816.40PROPOSED 8"COMBINED DOMESTICAND FIRE SUPPRESSIONWATER SERVICEPROPOSED 6" HYDRANTLEAD78 LF 10" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE @2.00%UPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 211057,700 SF PROPOSEDWETLAND BUFFER7,201 SF REQ'D825NOPARKINGNOPARKING 35.0'PROPOSED ROADWAYEASEMENT6181882112141416NOPARKINGNOPARKING 14NOPARKINGNOPARKING5.8'+/-CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS23.7'11.3'4620 APARTMENTS 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:2223908/31/22 CONCEPT SET09/22/22 FINAL REZONING APPLICATION. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c2022Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0OVERALL - UTILITYPLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINEINSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEFINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALLBE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OFTHE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOSIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROADCLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALLOWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFICLOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPONCOMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTSMUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION.SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.35982361114144600 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008Owner: City of Edina450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous Surface Stairs East Line Tract BNo Monuments Found or SetUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 211057,700 SF PROPOSEDWETLAND BUFFER7,201 SF REQ'D825NOPARKINGNOPARKING 35.0'PROPOSED ROADWAYEASEMENT6181882112141416NOPARKINGNOPARKING 5.8'+/-CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS23.7'11.3'REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.1RESIDENTIAL -LANDSCAPE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. . 4620 APARTMENTS 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:2223908/31/22 CONCEPT SET09/22/22 FINAL REZONING APPLICATION. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c2022Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-006001" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGENDPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULEAND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESEDGINGDECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA.LANDSCAPE NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTERINSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH.3.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER ORTO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2"FROM TREE TRUNK.4.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEWLANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMENSTANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATIONOF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.6.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THESCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.7.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUTTHE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BEWARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.8.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SODAS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.9.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES,LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINALLOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION.10.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.11.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'SACTIVITIES.12.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.13.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLYPROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDEHEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATIONPER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OFPAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INLCUDING PRICINGFROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8 5 12 3 467 N WWWW 12"TRUSS SAN S 0.00.00.0 0.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FALLS IN WATER MATCH LINETRACT A TRACT C TRACT W 17"MPL 13"EVG 13"EVG 8"HACK 12"ASH 13"SPCG 16"SPCG 16"SPCG 13"SPCG 30"MPL 13"MPL14"SPCG 22"SPCG 15"SPCG ARB 7"CRAB 7"CRAB 7"CRAB 26"MPL 26"MPL 15"COT SAN SAN EDINA CORPORATE CENTER 66665 89°39' 89°39' E. LINE OF TRACT B 55117.190°14.73UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 948779 S89°51'30"E 400.00 WOOD FENCE 8 FT. CHAIN LINK FENCE STONE WALL CONCRETE STAIRWELL CONCRETE STAIRWELL B I T U M I N O U SCO NCRETE CONC. TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL TYPICAL - SEE DETAILTYPICAL - SEE DETAIL OVERHANGMETAL AND GLASS ENTRY TYPICALENTRY 78.62248.5178.60 3 LEVEL PRECAST CONCRETE OFFICE BUILDING 4570 W. 77TH STREET BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 19,540± SQ. FT.248.5078.57 248.3778.62 ENTRY ENTRY 3 LEVEL PRECAST CONCRETE OFFICE BUILDING 4600 W. 77TH STREET BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 19,530± SQ. FT. TYPICAL - SEE DETAIL 8"CIP W 8"CIP W 8"W 8"W GAS GAS GAS ABAN. GAS ABAN. GAS SAN SSAN S3"CLAY SAN SSAN SUGC(P) UGE(P) UGE(P)UGE(P)UGE(P)UGE(P)UGE(P)xxxx COL COL HCS HCS HCS TCS TCS WV TMH EMH LP LPEMH DG GM AC HYD AC GP GP GP GP GP 1326 1327 1224 1225 1330 1379 1380 2128 2136 8246 8265 82668267 8304 8306 1322 1323 1324 1325 5054 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 UP UP 46' - 0"1698 SF CAFE 5696 SF COMMON AREA ENTER EXIT GARAGE APPROXIMATE END OF FIRE ACCESS ROAD ON PHASE I LOCATION OF PASS THROUGH ABOVE STEPS UP TO PLAZA ABOVE ONE WAYWEST 77TH STREET TRANSFORMER ENTRANCE35' - 0"20' - 0" COVERED ACTIVITY AREA 4602 SF COMMON AREA TWO WAYEXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 24' - 0"EXISTING PARKING LOT (EAST)EXISTING PARKING LOTINDOOR POOL 8.3%14.4%24' - 0"ONE WAY35' - 0"EXISTING BUILDING (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)ENTRANCEBUILDING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACK DOG PARK PATIOPATIOWOONERF PEDESTRIAN PLAZANEW PUBLIC STREET VEHICULAR CONNECTIONN PEDESTRIAN PARK ACCESS PAVERS BICYCLE PARK ACCESS BIKE SHOP BOCCE COURT STEPS UP TO PLAZA ABOVE VEHICULAR PARK ACCESS NEW ACCESS DRIVE (TWO WAY)PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PARKING LOT (NORTH) (RE-STRIPED TO 72 STALLS) MONUMENT SIGN ACCESS TO FIRE LANE SPEED TABLE AT CROSSWALK (TRAFFIC CALMING) STOP SIGNS AT INTERSECTION (TRAFFIC CALMING) TRASHAREA (RE-STRIPED TO 53 STALLS)FDC ELECTRICAL WATER GRAVEL BUFFER AROUND FIRE LANE PAVERS MONUMENT SIGN CAFE BELOW (OPEN) GARAGE 3478 SF COMMON AREA COMMON AREA BELOW (OPEN)2474 SF COMMON AREA 572.96 8.3%14.4% DNOPEN TO BELOW EGRESS COURTEGRESS COURT ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW B10-IZ D4 C10 D1C1C1C1B2B2B2D2 D3 B3 D9-IZ D10 B10-IZ C2 C2 B4 B4 C2 C2 B3 D10 B10-IZ D5 C8 D6B3B3D6 D9-IZ D5 C3 B7 B7 C4 C4 C5 C11 B8 D8 B9 D7 B10-IZ D7 B9 D8 B8 B8 C5 C4 C4 B7 B7 C3 B5 C8 B4 C1 N B9B9 B8 C11 B7 B7 C4 C4 C5 C5 C4 C4 B7 B7 B8 B8 B3 B3 B10-IZ D9-IZ B4 B3B3 B2 B2 B2 C1 C1 C10 B10-IZ C1 B5 B10-IZ B10-IZ C2 C2 C2 C2 C3 C8 C3 D4 D1D2 D3 D9-IZ D10 B4 D10 D5 D5 D6D6 D7D8 D7 D8 B4 C1 C8 ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF DECKD12 D6 D6 D12 C8 D5 B10-IZ D10C7 B4 B4 B3 B10-IZ C2 C2 C2 C2 D4 B10-IZ D10C7B3 D3 D2 B2 B2 B2 C1 C1 C1 D1 C10 D5 B5 B10-IZ F3 C8 C1 B4 C10 C1C1B2B2 B3 B10-IZ B3 B4 B4 B7 B7 C11 B8 C5 C4 C4 C4 C4 C5 B8 B8 B7 B7 B9B9 B3 B3 B10-IZ B5 B10-IZ B10-IZ C1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C3 C8 C3 D8 D7 D7 D8 D5 D9-IZ D10 D5 D6 D6 D2 D3 D9-IZ D10 D4 D1 C8 B2 C1 B4 D1 D4 C10 C1C1C1B2B2B2D2 D3 B3 D9-IZ D10 B10-IZ B10-IZ C2 C2 B4 B4 C2 C2 B3 D9-IZ D10 B10-IZ B5 D5 D5 C8 C3D6D6C3 B7 B7C4 C4 D11 B8 C9 B10-IZ F2 F1F1F2 D11 C4 C4B7 B7 C11 C9 ROOM TYPE LEGEND 1 BED 1 BED + DEN 2 BED 2 BED + DEN AFF 1 BED AFF 2 BED CIRCULATION UNIT STORAGE VERTICAL CIRCULATION F3 C8 B4 C1 1ST FLOOR100' -0" UPPER ROOF176' -1 3/8" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR132' -7 1/8" 5TH FLOOR143' -3" 6TH FLOOR153' -10 7/8" 7TH FLOOR164' -6 3/4" GARAGE ENTRYALUMINUM STOREFRONT STANDING SEAM METAL AWNING ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS GLASS & ALUMINUM GUARDRAIL VINYL SLIDING DOOR METAL PARAPET CAP ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA STAIR TO 3RD FLOOR THOROUGHFAREMATERIAL #1MATERIAL #1 MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #4 CONCRETE COLUMNSANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA 1ST FLOOR100' -0" UPPER ROOF176' -1 3/8" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR132' -7 1/8" 5TH FLOOR143' -3" 6TH FLOOR153' -10 7/8" 7TH FLOOR164' -6 3/4"ALUMINUM BALCONY W/ GLASS & ALUMINUM GUARDRAILS VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR GLASS & ALUMINUM GUARDRAILCONCRETE COLUMN MATERIAL #1 MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #2 ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA 1ST FLOOR100' -0" UPPER ROOF176' -1 3/8" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR132' -7 1/8" 5TH FLOOR143' -3" 6TH FLOOR153' -10 7/8" 7TH FLOOR164' -6 3/4" ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR MATERIAL #1 MATERIAL #4MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #3 STANDING SEAM METAL AWNING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT & BIKE STORAGE ENTRY MATERIAL #1ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT & MAIN BUILDING ENTRY MATERIAL #2 1ST FLOOR100' -0" UPPER ROOF176' -1 3/8" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR132' -7 1/8" 5TH FLOOR143' -3" 6TH FLOOR153' -10 7/8" 7TH FLOOR164' -6 3/4" MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 ALUMINUM & GLASS GUARDRAILSTAIR TO 3RD FLOOR THOROUGHFARE VINYL WINDOWS ALUMINUM BALCONY STAIR ACCESS VINYL SLIDING DOOR TRANSFORMERPLANTER BOXES MATERIAL #1 EXTERIOR FINISH KEY MATERIAL #1: BASIS OF DESIGN: PATTERN: COLOR: TINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL 512-2 HAND HEWN HEMLOCK BROWN MATERIAL #2: BASIS OF DESIGN: STYLE: COLOR: BRICK MASONRY UTILITY/ 1/3 RUNNING BOND CHARCOAL MATERIAL #3: BASIS OF DESIGN: STYLE: COLOR: METAL PANEL FLUSH REVEAL WARM GRAY ORIENTATION: VERTICAL MATERIAL #4: BASIS OF DESIGN: STYLE: COLOR: LAP SIDING 6" EXPOSURE LIGHT GRAY; SMOOTH ORIENTATION: HORIZONTAL 1ST FLOOR100' -0" UPPER ROOF176' -1 3/8" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR132' -7 1/8" 5TH FLOOR143' -3" 6TH FLOOR153' -10 7/8" 7TH FLOOR164' -6 3/4"ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR METAL PARAPET CAP ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #4 3RD FLOOR EXTERIOR CONNECTION 1ST FLOOR100' -0" UPPER ROOF176' -1 3/8" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR132' -7 1/8" 5TH FLOOR143' -3" 6TH FLOOR153' -10 7/8" 7TH FLOOR164' -6 3/4" ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOORMETAL PARAPET CAP CONCRETE COLUMNS MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 3RD FLOOR EXTERIOR CONNECTION MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #4 ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA MONUMENT SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR - SEE SITE PLAN FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS -SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE MONUMENT SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR -SEE SITE PLAN FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS -SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE TINTED PRECAST WALL PANELUTILITY BRICK VENEER VERTICAL METAL PANEL LAP SIDING VINYL SLIDING DOOR VINYL WINDOW FIXED AWNING ALUMINUM BALCONY GLASS PANELS ALUMINUM BALCONY PICKET RAILING 500.00450.00500.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 NOPARKING UPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREANOPARKINGPENTAGON PARK PHASE II 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:22239. .. .. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202259612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET. .. .. .. .. .. .PENTAGON PARK PHASE IIEDINA, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNISSUED FOR: PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422CONTACT: ROBBIE LATTA612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:C2.0 OVERALL - SITE PLANKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTBDL1.1 RESIDENTIAL - LANDSCAPE PLANARCHITECT:MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP755 N PRIOR AVE N#301AST. PAUL, MN 55114CONTACT: CRAIG HARTMANCRAIG@MDGARCHITECTS.COM651-253-2981SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N FIRST STSUITE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: CURT GUNSBURYCURT@SOLHEM.COM612-216-2825C2.1 RESIDENTIAL - SITE PLANRESIDENTIAL - GRADING PLANC3.1RESIDENTIAL - UTILITY PLANC4.1"THE FRED"CSG PROJECT 21105PHASE II RESIDENTIALPUBLIC STREETEXISTING BUILDINGS TO REMAINCIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422CONTACT: RORY SYNSTELIEN612-615-0060 S00°08'30"W 473.91 UPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 21105NOPARKINGPUBLIC ROADWAYPROJECT PLANSAND DETAIL TBDPENTAGON PARK PHASE II 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:22239. .. .. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202259612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC2.0OVERALL - SITE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"N1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOPERVIOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - CONCRETEPAVER PERVIOUS SYSTEM. INCLUDE ALL BASEMATERIAL AND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS.MAKE: BELGARD, OR EQUIVILANTMODEL: AQUASTONE, OR EQUIVILANTCOLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ARIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGAND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFFOOTING MATERIALS.6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETEFOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCEWITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TOTHE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BEWHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIORTO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENTSECTIONS.18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THEDRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHINPRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAILOPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDEPARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO.SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OF-SITETRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN EXTERIOR TRASHAREA AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO.WEEKLY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONTDOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS). APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 3 PER DOC.NO. 2896409UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.359823611131414WalkwayWalkway4620 77th Street WExisting Building4600 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008P.I.D: 3102824310058Owner: City of Edina450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsStairsStairsStairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous Surface Bituminous SurfaceConcreteStairsStairs Concrete East Line Tract B15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 21105CONCRETE C.I.P.STEPS, COORD. W/ARCHITECTURENOPARKINGCONCRETE C.I.P.STEPS, COORD. W/ARCHITECTURELANDSCAPE PLANTING,SEE LANDSCAPE PLANCONCRETE WALK,TYP.6.0'MATCH EXISTINGASPHALTPAVEMENT, SEEGRADING PLANGRAVEL PAVEMENTFIRE ACCESS PATH10.0'8,446 SF PROPOSEDWETLAND BUFFER8,110 SF REQ'DLANDSCAPED AREA,SEE LANDSCAPEPLANRAISED CONCRETEPATIO/PORCHBITUMINOUS PED/BIKE PATHCONCRETE SLOPEDWALKWAYRETAINING WALLSEGMENTAL BLOCKCONCRETE WALKWAYRETAINING WALLSEGMENTAL BLOCKW/METAL SAFETYRAILINGRETAINING WALLSEGMENTAL BLOCKW/ METAL SAFETYRAILINGRIBBON CURB, TYPRIBBONCURB, TYPSTOP SIGN,MUTCD R1-1,W/ STOPLINEPAINTEDDIRECTIONALARROWS,TYPCONCRETE DRIVE APRONCONCRETE WALKWAYBITUMINOUS PED/BIKE PATHCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSCONCRETE WALKWAYMONUMENT SIGN, SEEARCH PLANSFACING NORTHONE WAY DO NOT ENTER SIGN,MUTCD R5-1FACING SOUTHEND ONE WAY SIGN, MUTCD R6-7BEGIN ONE WAY,MUTCD R6-6STOP SIGN,MUTCD R1-1CONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSCONCRETE PAVER CROSSWALKSC.I.P. RETAININGWALLMONUMENT SIGN, SEEARCH PLANSPUBLIC ROADWAYPROJECT PLANSAND DETAIL TBDPENTAGON PARK PHASE II 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:22239. .. .. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202259612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC2.1RESIDENTIAL -SITE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOPERVIOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - CONCRETEPAVER PERVIOUS SYSTEM. INCLUDE ALL BASEMATERIAL AND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS.MAKE: BELGARD, OR EQUIVILANTMODEL: AQUASTONE, OR EQUIVILANTCOLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHINPRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAIL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 3 PER DOC.NO. 2896409UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.359823611131414WalkwayWalkway4620 77th Street WExisting Building4600 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsStairsStairsStairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceConcreteStairsConcrete15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 21105NOPARKINGPENTAGON PARK PHASE II 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:22239. .. .. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202259612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC3.1RESIDENTIAL -GRADING PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 3 PER DOC.NO. 2896409UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.359823611131414WalkwayWalkway4620 77th Street WExisting Building4600 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340008450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsStairsStairsStairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceConcreteStairsConcrete15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 21105NOPARKINGPROPOSED UNDERGROUND WET POND120" AND 60" CMPSTONE BASE INVERT, 120"=813.65STONE BASE INVERT, 60"=818.65TOTAL FOOTPRINT=19'X192' (INCLUDES 12" SIDE AND END STONE)PERMANENT (DEAD) STORAGE=15,327 CFFLOOD (LIVE) STORAGE=9,928 CFWRAP SYSTEM WITH 40-MIL IMPERMEABLE LINER WITH SEALED SEAMS24" FESIE=820.00RAINWATER REUSE CISTERN60" PRINSCO DUAL WALL PIPEFOOTPRINT=45'X16.27'STONE BASE IE=816.40PROPOSED 8"COMBINED DOMESTICAND FIRE SUPPRESSIONWATER SERVICEPROPOSED 6" HYDRANTLEAD78 LF 10" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE @2.00%PENTAGON PARK PHASE II 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:22239. .. .. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202259612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC4.1RESIDENTIAL -UTILITY PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .UTILITY LEGEND:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 4 PER DOC.APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND TANK NO. 3 PER DOC.NO. 2896409UNDERGROUND EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 904324UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC. NO.3598236UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NO.359823611131414WalkwayWalkway4620 77th Street WExisting Building4600 77th Street WExisting BuildingP.I.D: 3102824340007P.I.D: 3102824340008P.I.D: 3102824310058Owner: City of Edina7640 Parklawn Ave450.00500.00S00°08'30"W 473.91 StairsStairsStairsStairsStairsBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceBituminous SurfaceConcreteStairsConcrete Delineated Wetland 15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTUPUPCAFECOMMON AREAGARAGECOMMON AREAREFERENCE"THE FRED" CSGPROJECT 21105NOPARKING8,446 SF PROPOSEDWETLAND BUFFER8,110 SF REQ'D78 LF 10" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE @2.00%REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONL1.1RESIDENTIAL -LANDSCAPE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. . PENTAGON PARK PHASE II 4620 W 77TH ST, EDINA, MN 55435 724 N FIRST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:22239. .. .. .. .. .. .06/27/22 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL,JLRL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202259612ROBERT A. LATTALICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-006001" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGENDPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULEAND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESEDGINGDECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA.LANDSCAPE NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTERINSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH.3.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER ORTO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2"FROM TREE TRUNK.4.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEWLANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMENSTANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATIONOF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.6.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THESCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.7.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUTTHE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BEWARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.8.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SODAS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.9.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES,LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINALLOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION.10.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.11.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'SACTIVITIES.12.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.13.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLYPROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDEHEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATIONPER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OFPAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INLCUDING PRICINGFROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8 5 12 3 467 N 45' - 10"CAFE COMMON AREA ENTER EXIT GARAGE APPROXIMATE END OF FIRE ACCESS ROAD ON PHASE I LOCATION OF PASS THROUGH ABOVE STEPS UP TO PLAZA ABOVE EXISTING PARKING LOT ONE WAYWEST 77TH STREET TRANSFORMER 16' - 0"ENTRANCE35' - 0"20' - 0" COVERED ACTIVITY AREA COMMON AREA TWO WAYEXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 24' - 0"EXISTING PARKING LOTEXISTING PARKING LOTINDOOR POOL 8.3%14.4%24' - 0"ONE WAYTWO WAY35' - 0"REINFORCED TURF PAVERS TO PROVIDE FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS EXISTING BUILDING (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) ENTRANCE BUILDING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACK DOG PARK PATIOPATIOWOONERF PEDESTRIAN PLAZANEW PUBLIC STREET VEHICULAR CONNECTIONN PEDESTRIAN PARK ACCESS PAVERSSURMOUNTABLE CURB AT FIRE ROAD BICYCLE PARK ACCESS BIKE SHOP BOCCE COURT STEPS UP TO PLAZA ABOVE VEHICULAR PARK ACCESS CAFE BELOW (OPEN) GARAGE COMMON AREA COMMON AREA BELOW (OPEN) COMMON AREA 572.96 8.3%14.4% DNEGRESS COURTEGRESS COURT ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOM TYPE LEGEND 1 BED 1 BED + DEN 2 BED CIRCULATION STUDIO UNIT STORAGE VERTICAL CIRCULATION N ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF DECK 1ST FLOOR100' -0" ROOF177' -0" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR133' -0" 5TH FLOOR144' -0" 6TH FLOOR155' -0" 7TH FLOOR166' -0" GARAGE ENTRYALUMINUM STOREFRONT STANDING SEAM METAL AWNING ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS GLASS & ALUMINUM GUARDRAIL VINYL SLIDING DOOR METAL PARAPET CAP ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA STAIR TO 3RD FLOOR THOROUGHFAREMATERIAL #1MATERIAL #1 MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #4 CONCRETE COLUMNSANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA 81' - 0"1ST FLOOR100' -0" ROOF177' -0" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR133' -0" 5TH FLOOR144' -0" 6TH FLOOR155' -0" 7TH FLOOR166' -0"ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR ALUMINUM & GLASS GUARDRAIL CONCRETE COLUMN MATERIAL #1 MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #2 1ST FLOOR100' -0" ROOF177' -0" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR133' -0" 5TH FLOOR144' -0" 6TH FLOOR155' -0" 7TH FLOOR166' -0"ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR MATERIAL #1 MATERIAL #4MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #3 STANDING SEAM METAL AWNING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT & BIKE STORAGE ENTRY MATERIAL #1ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BUILDING SIGNAGEALUMINUM STOREFRONT & MAIN BUILDING ENTRY MATERIAL #2 1ST FLOOR100' -0" ROOF177' -0" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR133' -0" 5TH FLOOR144' -0" 6TH FLOOR155' -0" 7TH FLOOR166' -0" MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #2MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #1 ALUMINUM & GLASS GUARDRAILSTAIR TO 3RD FLOOR THOROUGHFARE VINYL WINDOWS ALUMINUM BALCONY STAIR ACCESS VINYL SLIDING DOOR TRANSFORMER EXTERIOR FINISH KEY MATERIAL #1: BASIS OF DESIGN: PATTERN: COLOR: TINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL 512-2 HAND HEWN HEMLOCK BROWN MATERIAL #2: BASIS OF DESIGN: STYLE: COLOR: BRICK MASONRY UTILITY/ 1/3 RUNNING BOND CHARCOAL MATERIAL #3: BASIS OF DESIGN: STYLE: COLOR: METAL PANEL FLUSH REVEAL WARM GRAY ORIENTATION:VERTICAL MATERIAL #4: BASIS OF DESIGN: STYLE: COLOR: LAP SIDING 6" EXPOSURE LIGHT GRAY; SMOOTH ORIENTATION:HORIZONTAL 1ST FLOOR100' -0" ROOF177' -0" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR133' -0" 5TH FLOOR144' -0" 6TH FLOOR155' -0" 7TH FLOOR166' -0"ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR METAL PARAPET CAP ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA MATERIAL #2 MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #4 3RD FLOOR EXTERIOR CONNECTION 1ST FLOOR100' -0" ROOF177' -0" 2ND FLOOR110' -8" 3RD FLOOR122' -0" 4TH FLOOR133' -0" 5TH FLOOR144' -0" 6TH FLOOR155' -0" 7TH FLOOR166' -0"ALUMINUM BALCONY VINYL WINDOWS VINYL SLIDING DOOR METAL PARAPET CAP CONCRETE COLUMNS MATERIAL #3MATERIAL #4 MATERIAL #2 3RD FLOOR EXTERIOR CONNECTION MATERIAL #3 MATERIAL #4 ANGLED TIMBER PERGOLA MONUMENT SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR - SEE SITE PLAN FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS -SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE MONUMENT SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR -SEE SITE PLAN FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS -SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE TINTED PRECAST WALL PANELUTILITY BRICK VENEER VERTICAL METAL PANEL LAP SIDING VINYL SLIDING DOOR VINYL WINDOW FIXED AWNING ALUMINUM BALCONY GLASS PANELS ALUMINUM BALCONY PICKET RAILING 1 223413v7 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA 4600 77TH STREET WEST REDEVELOPMENT THIS SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated ___________________, 2022, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer” and “Owner”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. The Developer has applied to redevelop the following legally described property in the City of Edina, Minnesota: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Subject Property”). The Developer is seeking City approval to amend the Development Agreement to tear down the one existing office building and construct a 5-7-story, 276-unit apartment complex (“Development” or “Project”). The Project will provide 28 units of affordable housing. B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property from a Mixed Development District-6 (MDD-6) to a PUD, Planned Unit Development (“PUD”). The Project is in accordance with the PUD Zoning District and meets the PUD criteria. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required for the PUD. 2 223413v7 2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Registrar of Title’s Office; 2) the required security has been received by the City; and 3) the required insurance certificate has been received by the City. 3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans (“Plans”) which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are:  Final Development Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group and Momentum Design Group.  Existing Conditions and Removal Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Site Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Grading Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Erosion Control Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Utility Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Details Plan dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Final Landscaping Plan dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Signage Plan dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group.  Sidewalk and Pedestrian Plans dated September 26, 2022 prepared by Civil Site Group and Momentum Design Group.  Traffic and Parking Impact Study dated July 20, 2022 prepared by Stantec. The Developer may request changes to the Plans. Plan changes deemed non-material or minor, pursuant to City ordinances, can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other material Plan changes shall require approval by the City Council. 4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control obligations if they would be reasonable and beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which 3 223413v7 may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. 5. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be performed by the City under this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan, which will be provided by the Developer and approved by the City prior to the commencement of construction. 7. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY/HOURS. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. and must be consistent with City Code. The City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, not to exceed $2,500, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s 4 223413v7 inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements within thirty (30) months after issuance of the necessary permits for the Public Improvements. 10. CLEAN UP. Within 24 hours the Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from the construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer, the Public Improvements shall become City property without further notice or action, and will thereafter be maintained by the City as public property. Prior to acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits:  Contractor’s Certificate  Engineer’s Certificate  Developer’s Certificate 5 223413v7 certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed Public Improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the Public Improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible record drawings. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of utilities. 12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay for the City’s in-house engineering administration in the amount of $5,000. City in-house engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the warranty period, final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. 13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all Public and Private Improvements, and construction of all Public and Private Improvements in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall either deposit cash with the City or furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (or some combination of cash and a letter of credit), from a bank in the total amount of $30,000 (the "Security"). The bank issuing the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager and the bank shall be authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, and shall provide a Minnesota office for presentment of the Letter of Credit or other alternative acceptable to the City. The City may draw down the security after an event of default by Developer under the terms of this Agreement and failure of Developer to cure the default after lapse of the grace period given Developer to cure a default under Section 18 of this Agreement, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or, without 6 223413v7 notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public and Private Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all Public Improvements is one (1) year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Engineer. The Developer shall post or cause its contractor to post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. A. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2022-73. B. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in the Engineering’s memo dated July 11, 2022, including meeting the City’s sustainability policy which is subject to review and approval of the City’s sustainability manager. 7 223413v7 C. The watermain extension noted in the Plans along the north and east property lines will be constructed by Developer and paid for directly by the City. D. The Developer shall comply and is subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property. E. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements pursuant to Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. F. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements pursuant City Code Section 36-1260 and receive City’s review and approval of such plan. G. Developer shall install code compliant bike racks near the building entrances. H. Developer shall install the any and all signs, as per the approved Sign Plans. I. Developer shall submit updated plans for a new vehicular access road with sidewalk providing access from 77th Street, for the City’s review and approval, to allow for the following: (i) a 35’ street and sidewalk easement; with (ii) a 6’ boulevard, 0.5’for back of curb, 22’ street (face of curb to face of curb), 0.5 curb, 6’ sidewalk; and (iii) a wider street opening at 77th Street (collectively, the “Fred Richards Park Access Road”). J. Developer shall install the Fred Richards Park Access Road with permitting assistance from the City. K. The City shall vacate the driveway Easement Agreement recorded May 17, 1993 as Hennepin County Document No. T2375224 after completion of construction of the Fred Richards Park Access Road and delivery of the duly-executed easement described Section 15.M. below. L. After the City completes construction of the extension of the Fred Richards Park Access Road (connecting the Fred Richards Park Access Road to the City’s park property to the north of the parcel containing the Fred Richard Park Access Road) and construction of parking lots on City’s park 8 223413v7 property (to be further defined in the easement agreement referenced in Section 15.M. below), the City will be responsible for snow removal on the Fred Richards Park Access Road and the sidewalk. M. As a condition of approval for this Agreement, Developer shall, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the Project, obtain and deliver to the City for recording a permanent non-exclusive public easement agreement granting the City an easement over and across the Fred Richards Park Access Road, which agreement shall be by and between by and between the City and the owner of the property lying immediately east of the Subject Property that contains the Fred Richards Park Access Road. N. Developer’s installation of the roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened pursuant City Code Section 36-1459 and shall receive City’s review and approval of such plan. O. Developer shall obtain and submit to the City for approval a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit prior to issuance of a building permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District’s requirements. P. The Developer shall comply with the Wenck Consulting Traffic and Parking Study recommendations. Q. The Developer shall provide a performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit to the City for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of the first building permit. R. The Developer shall submit a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. S. As a condition of approval for this Agreement, Developer shall, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the Project, obtain and deliver to the City for recording a permanent non-exclusive public pedestrian easement agreement granting the City an easement over and across the pedestrian woonerf. 9 223413v7 T. As a condition of approval for this Agreement, Developer shall, prior to the issuance of the building permit for the Project, obtain and deliver to the City for recording a public access easement agreement granting the City an easement over the east-west sidewalk along 77th Street, which agreement shall be by and between Developer, the owner of the property lying immediately east of the Subject Property that contains a portion of said sidewalk, and the City. The City will maintain the east-west sidewalk along 77th Street (including, without limitation, snow and ice removal) and make necessary repairs and replacements of the same, which obligation shall also be included in said easement agreement. U. The Developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all internal private sidewalks to the Project (which shall not be deemed to include the sidewalk on the Subject Property along 77th Street referenced above). 16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to the development of the site, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and development of the Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer’s development of the site and installation of Public Improvements, except for costs incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees, except for costs, damagers or expenses incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct, occurring during Developer’s ownership of the Subject Property. 10 223413v7 C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this Agreement. B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer without cure in the time period provided in Section 18 below shall be grounds for denial of building permits. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. E. This Agreement shall run with the land and will be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. F. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire commercial general liability insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out 11 223413v7 of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for such insurance shall be in a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: 1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.” 2. Certificate Holder must be City of Edina. 3. Provide a copy of the policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. G. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000 each accident. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer represents to the City that the Public Improvements comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Public 12 223413v7 Improvements do not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council prior to issuance of the Certificate of Completion. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. K. An uncured breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer and the failure to cure such breach within the period provided in this Agreement, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. L. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this Agreement. 18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer, beyond the applicable notice and cure periods provided in this Agreement, as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any actual out-of-pocket expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default and the opportunity to cure, not less than thirty (30) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 13 223413v7 19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 4620 LLC Attn: Curt Gunsbury 724 North First Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: City of Edina Attn: City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424-1330 20. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. After the Developer has received the final certificate of occupancy for the Improvements and completed the work required under this Agreement, the City Manager will issue a certificate of completion after written request from the Developer. The certificate of completion shall be consistent in form with the certificate of completion issued by the City and shall be in recordable form and may be recorded against the Subject Property. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 14 223413v7 CITY: CITY OF EDINA By: __________________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor And __________________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2022, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ Notary Public 15 223413v7 DEVELOPER: 4620 LLC By: ______________________________________ ____________________________ [print name] Its ___________________________ [title] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2022, by _______________________, the ______________ of 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK 16 223413v7 EXHIBIT A IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. By: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________EXHIBIT B 17 223413v7 LENDER CONSENT Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Approve First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk for Cahill Area District Plan Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve first amendment to professional services agreement with Bolton & Menk for Cahill Area District Plan. INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina has been awarded a $50,000 Hennepin Planning Grant from Hennepin County to expand the scope of the Cahill Area District P lan process. This additional scope will allow the City to go more in depth in analyzing mobility and public realm improvements in the district. This will include identification of challenges and opportunities in making the area more accessible by walking, biking, and transit, as well as ways to improve the public realm to be a more attractive, sustainable, and cohesive space within the district. The City already allocated $75,000 for the Cahill Area District Plan. No additional match is required so the amended scope of work will be 100% funded by the Hennepin Planning Grant. T he City Council is asked to approve the attached contract amendment with Bolton & Menk to add the expanded scope. The Cahill Area District Plan process is already underway and is anticipated to be completed in the spring of 2023. For more information, visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/cahill-district-area-plan ATTACHMENTS: Description Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk Exhibits A & B to First Amendment 223123v3 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT made this _______ day of __________________, 2022 (“First Amendment”), by and between City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “City”), and Bolton & Menk, a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”). WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated April 5, 2022 relating to services relating to the Cahill Area District and the City’s plans for said district (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to incorporate a greater scope of work. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement, is revised as follows: 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement. B. City’s Cahill Area District Plan Request for Proposals, attached hereto as Exhibit A. C. Consultant’s Proposal for Cahill Area District Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B. D. Cahill District Connectivity and Public Realm Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit C. In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority. 2. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement, is revised as follows: 3. COMPENSATION. A. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($75,000.00) inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges for all work described in Exhibits A and B. B. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment of Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($50,000.00) inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges for all work described in Exhibit C.         223123v3 C. Consultant shall facilitate two Working Group meetings in addition to the nine specified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B. The focus for the two additional Working Group meetings shall be related to the scope of work identified in Exhibit C. D. These fees shall not be adjusted if the estimated hour to perform a task is exceeded. If additional tasks or meetings are requested by the City beyond the scope of all work described in Exhibit A, B, or C, and the City approves and agrees to the additional work in advance of the Consultant performing it, the City shall compensate the Consultant on an hourly basis for this additional work. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. 3. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This First Amendment shall be binding on the parties, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be executed this _____ day of ____________, 2022. Dated: __________________, 2022. CITY OF EDINA BY: ________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor BY: ________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Dated: __________________, 2022 BOLTON & MENK By: _______________________________ Name:____________________________ Title:_____________________________                 223123v3 EXHIBIT C Cahill District Connectivity and Public Realm Plan Overview The purpose of this connectivity and public realm plan is to investigate how the study area is connected, and how public spaces and corridors can be enhanced to make this as a more vibrant, sustainable, and meaningful place. The goal would be to advance the ideas closer to buildable concepts, and to set specific guidance for when change occurs (either via a public or private investments). This relates both to the internal spaces and connections within the district, as well as linkages to the broader area context. The connections and systems being addressed will include consideration of the following elements, both in terms of existing and planned conditions. More definition will be provided to these through the work to be completed (as a prior phase) in the Cahill District Plan: x Bicycle and pedestrian network, including, sidewalks, trails, crossings, and other facilities x Transit network and facilities, including bus stops and routes, signage, and potential for last mile/micro-mobility options x Streetscape and other landscaping in the public realm, with a focus on the public right of way and on spaces accessible to the public x Green infrastructure, including natural landscape features, stormwater management, tree canopy, and others x Placemaking and design features including (but not limited to) signage and wayfinding, public art, monumentation, district gateway treatments, street furniture, and other character- defining elements that may be placed in the public realm. Project Scope The scope of work will build on baseline work done through the Cahill District Plan. The Cahill District Plan will include identification of (1) baseline mapping of existing conditions within the district, (2) development of goals and guiding principles for the future development of the district, (3) the general location of multimodal connections needed to support the vision, that are currently missing or underdeveloped, (3) identification of needs to upgrade the public realm so that it is consistent with the plan vision, and (4) community insights and feedback about needs and opportunities that will inform results, based on an extensive engagement process. The Cahill Connectivity and Public Realm Plan will take a deeper and more detailed look at the topics mentioned in the overview above, moving them towards design and implementation. This will include the following tasks: 1. Review the current policy and regulatory frameworks guiding connectivity and public realm. This includes plans, standards, and maintenance responsibilities around: a. Streets and sidewalk design and maintenance b. Trail facilities, both local and regional c. Stormwater management standards d. Transit facility service and facility guidelines e. General public realm maintenance f. Roles of agencies and jurisdictions         223123v3 2. Identification of area and corridor systems, and related typologies, to guide decision making and approach, including: a. Identification of the primary built and natural systems that are within, and connecting to, the district. b. Identification and prioritization of existing and planned corridors within the district, including connections to the broader network c. Identification and definition of character areas and zones, including implications for the future of these areas, and how they relate to the unique identity of this place d. Other classification systems, as needed and appropriate 3. Assessment and recommendations for improvements to connectivity, both within the district and beyond to the surrounding area, including: a. Assessment of challenges and opportunities in making the area more accessible by walking, biking, and transit, considering the needs of commuters, customers/clients, residents, and recreational users. b. Recommended projects to fill gaps in the multimodal network, including new and improved street, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections and service c. Street, sidewalk, and trail standards, including typical cross sections, design guidelines, and related amenities/enhancements d. Transit connectivity and service improvement recommendations, including last mile and micro-mobility considerations 4. Assessment and recommendations for improvements to the public realm within the district, with attention to how it connects to larger built and natural systems. This includes: a. Assessment of opportunities to improve the public realm to be a more attractive, sustainable, and cohesive space within the district. b. Recommended projects to enhance the district’s public realm and promote sustainability, including streetscape and other landscaping, stormwater management and other green infrastructure, and placemaking improvements. c. Design guidelines for the public realm and the elements therein, including green infrastructure and placemaking components. Standards will connect with broader city goals and policies for the district. Deliverables: Draft and final plan document, including maps, graphics, and drawings to illustrate concepts. The plan will be reviewed concurrently with the Cahill District Plan, and the review process will include oversight by the District Plan working group. Consultant shall facilitate two Working Group meetings in addition to the nine specified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B. The focus for the two additional Working Group meetings shall be related to the scope of work identified in Exhibit C.         EXHIBIT A CAHILL AREA DISTRICT PLAN REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS City of Edina, Minnesota Cahill Area District Plan Request for Proposal for Consulting Services Objective Draft an area plan for the Cahill District of Edina, MN to guide future development of the district. Based on early conversations, important guiding principles include family-friendly, sustainable, safe, and connected to neighboring communities, while also being a premier model for intentional design. The city seeks a consultant to assist in the creating of this plan. Overview The area is roughly 380 acres in size; land uses include professional offices, medical, construction, light industrial, wholesale trade, information technology, recreation, retail and restaurants, religious facilities, storage, daycare, education, and multi-family residential. It is the only commercial area within the Southwest quadrant of Edina, with restaurants and services frequented by neighborhoods directly to the west, north, and east. The site is bounded by West 70th Street to the north, Cahill Road to the west, Highway 100 to the east and the municipal boundary to the City of Bloomington directly south of the project area. The area is bounded by multi-family to the west and north with some single and double dwelling units north of 70th Street. The buildings in this area are generally older and have experienced limited remodeling or renovation with some remodeling of existing structures over the last 10-15 years for new tenant spaces. The City completed the Small Area Plan for the 70th & Cahill Neighborhood Node in January of 2019. An outcome of that plan was identifying the need to further study the entire Cahill Area business/industrial park to determine how best to revitalize the area. The City has also received several development proposals for multi-family residential on property guided for industrial or office; however, infrastructure capacity is currently a constraint and would need to be addressed in the plan. Detailed analysis of the infrastructure will be done by city staff. Kickoff Meeting In November 2021, a community meeting with approximately 100 attendees was held to begin the process of this district plan. Ideas collected span visions, specific goals, and some open questions. Collectively, our community wants to create a first-class vision for this district. We want this to be seen as a national model for regenerating a community. Think big: Zero emissions? Self- sustainable? What about an innovation hub and small business incubator that is also family- friendly? Key attributes that residents want to see include: • Family-friendly and safe • Sustainable design, clean energy, and more greenspace (including native grasses) • Better public transportation (include sidewalks and bike lanes) • Space for small to mid-sized businesses (“green urban village”) • Strong employment center • Harmonious transitions to residential neighborhoods Specific ideas for the future include, but are not limited to, a community grocer, design changes to roadways, and a dog park. Responses gathered from the public can be viewed on the project webpage at bettertogetheredina.org/cahill-district-area-plan Cahill Area District District Area Plan Process A successful district area plan is the result of an extended effort by several parties. In Edina, key contributors to the process include the City Council, Planning Commission, District Area Working Group, staff, and the consulting organization. Consultants can expect to work extensively with the District Area Working Group which will include representatives from both the Planning Commission and neighborhood stakeholders, as well as staff liaisons. A summary of the respective roles of each party is outlined in the diagram below. Staff City Council Planning Commission District Area Working Group Call for action and provide direction on project scope Final plan approval Champion community engagement process Develop Working Group charter and recruit participants Submit draft plan for review and approval Ensure draft plan is consistent with Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives Staff Serve as technical resource Manage consultants Coordinate meetings Coordinate marketing Ensure regulatory compliance Consultant Serve as technical resource Facilitate community meetings Synthesize data Draft plan document Consultant Scope of Work Consultants will be responsible for the following activities during the district planning process: • Developing a current area profile that includes demographics, physical conditions, land use/zoning and other pertinent information; also projecting population, demographic, economic and environmental trends for the future, • Working with the District Area Working Group to develop a community engagement plan, • Leading or assisting with the implementation of the community engagement plan, • Identifying issues or conflicts and potential options for consideration by the District Area Working Group, • Drafting the district area plan document, and • Make final edits to draft plan based on public feedback The Community Engagement Plan should generate the following district plan components: Values, Trends and Assessments A SWOT-type analysis should be done to determine strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. In addition, strongly-held community values should be identified. Visioning and Issue Identification Descriptive end-states or visions of what the community wants for the future. Fundamental conflicts or key challenges should also be identified and discussed. Strategy Formulation Major programs, initiatives or actions should be identified to address key issues, including land use, and to move the community towards its shared vision. The strategy should assign accountability and a timeframe for action steps. The consultant’s scope of work should include at least the following meetings: • 9 Working Group meetings (1 per month for 9 months) • 2 community meetings The City will host and manage a platform for online engagement. The district area plan document should follow the same general outline as Edina’s Comprehensive Plan. Content would include: • Introduction • Vision, Goals and Objectives • District Profile • Land Use and Community Design • Housing • Economic Competitiveness and Economic Development • Heritage Preservation • Transportation • Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources • Energy and Environment • Implementation Plan Within each chapter, the following information should be summarized: • General background information, including current conditions • Trends and challenges • Specific goals and tactics to reach the goal. While the goal is to follow a common format to promote alignment with the comprehensive plan, there is flexibility to add information or topics based on specific community concerns, needs or interests. Timeline The City is anticipating an approximate 9-month timeframe for the project by the consultant. However, the project may extend if public review of the draft plan cannot be completed prior. Kickoff Meeting Identify Working Group and Consultant Develop Work Plan and Prepare for Engagement Public Input Meetings Develop and Review Draft Plan Planning Commission Review City Council Review Budget The City has budgeted a maximum of $75,000 for this project. Response Guidelines and Deadline Interested consultants should forward the following information in electronic format (no more than 10 pages) for consideration: 1) Brief description of proposed approach to the project, 2) A summary of any information or support anticipated to be needed from staff, 3) What specific skills or experiences makes the responder particularly well suited to this work? 4) Brief biographies of any staff who would directly engage with the Working Group, city staff or residents, including hourly rate and estimated percentage of total budget allocation, and identification of the person that will serve as the project lead, Nov 2021 Apr 2022 May 2022-Aug 2022 June- Dec 2022 Jan 2023 Feb 2023 Jan – Mar 2022 5) Examples of past similar projects with similar scope, land area, complexity, and fee, including references and links to final work products, this project team has created, 6) Anticipated cost and timeline of the project. If additional working group meetings need to be added beyond those stated in this RFP, please indicate the additional cost for in-person and virtual meetings, and 7) Anticipated approach to the project. If alternative frameworks would be better, please outline in your recommended approach (ie: different timeframe, number of meetings). Electronic responses and/or questions related to the RFP should be directed to Kris Aaker (KAaker@EdinaMN.gov / 952-826-0461) and Addison Lewis (ALewis@EdinaMN.gov / 952-833- 9521) with the project name in the subject line. Responses are due by 4:30pm on Friday, March 4th, 2022. A virtual information session for interested consultants will be held at 10am on Tuesday, February 22nd. Please email Kris Aaker and Addison Lewis to be sent the virtual meeting invite. City staff will screen and select three consultants to be interviewed by select Planning Commissioners and staff based on the perceived match between the information provided and the City’s project needs. Interviews with the project team are anticipated to take place during the month of March. EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL FOR CAHILL AREA DISTRICT PLAN March 4, 2022 Kris Aaker Assistant City Planner City of Edina KAaker@EdinaMN.gov RE: Proposal for Cahill Area District Plan Dear Kris and Addison: Edina's Cahill industrial area is a unique and rare opportunity. Currently home to a diverse collection of uses, there have been many ideas for this area over the years—from an update of the current industrial mix to an ambitious revisioning of the area as a mixed-use community. As the world at large is asking big questions about how people will live and work in the future, Edina is on the forefront of thinking about how this applies here. Our team is excited by the opportunity to join with you on this planning process. Distinctives of our approach include the following: Connect Meaningfully – We know that engaging with Edina isn’t just like every other place. We expect people to show up and participate with thoughtful insights, relevant information, active curiosity, and strong opinions. We anticipate being questioned and challenged and we know that discussions will be active and collaborative—and we love it! Our team will bring enthusiasm for connecting with bright, curious, and informed people seeking to make this area the best it can be. We have direct experience working with Edina on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and multiple small area plans. Think Holistically – The development of an urban mixed-use district requires synthesis and systemic thinking regarding the issues and opportunities of an area. Our multidisciplinary team is committed to exploring not just individual subject areas, but how disparate areas connect to make great places. We will apply this thinking with the community’s goals in mind regarding resilience, restorative development, economic vitality, and livability. Our team brings tools, frameworks, and ideas for understanding issues and synthesizing themes. Explore Effectively – We are intrigued by the possibility of potential development and design features of this district and look at this project as an opportunity to explore the evolution of sustainable living and working spaces. Through an interactive, scenario-based approach, we hope to make space for generating discussion on options, trade-offs, and priorities. Our team has extensive background and experience with scenario building methodologies and ways of visualizing and shaping alternatives. In continued service to the City of Edina, we are excited at the opportunity to complete the Cahill Area District Plan. I will serve as your lead client contact and project manager. Please contact me at 651-434-5743 or haila.maze@bolton-menk.com if you have any questions regarding our proposal. Respectfully submitted, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Haila R. Maze, AICP Project Manager Addison Lewis Residential Redevelopment Coordinator City of Edina ALewis@EdinaMN.gov PROPOSAL FOR CAHILL AREA DISTRICT PLAN Contact: Haila Maze, AICP 651-434-5743 Haila.Maze@bolton-menk.com March 4, 2022 111 Washington Ave South, Suite 650 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612-416-0220 | Bolton-Menk.com 1 In Partnership With: Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 2 OVERVIEW With its unique role and position, the Cahill District is important to the future of Edina. It holds great promise as a place for leading businesses, local pride, community services, and important regional connections. Platted and developed in the late 1960s and 70s at the edge of the city, the Cahill District was a logical location for industries needing rail or truck access. The district and the region have developed over the years, and what was once on the edge of the region is now in the middle of the I-494 corridor, one of the most powerful economic engines in the Upper Midwest. This dichotomy— being on the edge of the city, and middle of a regional corridor—illustrates the challenges and opportunities presented by this district plan. We believe a healthy city is one that is constantly evolving to support the values and needs of its community. Our approach to small area planning will help ensure the district serves the Edina community by being economically sound, environmentally responsible, and well-integrated with its surroundings. An Evolving District: From Regional to Local; From Industrial to Mixed Since its original development 50 years ago, the district has remained an employment center contributing significantly to the city and the region. Today, it is home to over 200 businesses and 5,000 employees. Over the past decade, the district has become home to a new generation of businesses attracted to what the area is today, not what it was. The area continues to leverage opportunities based on its excellent access to workforce and talent. At the same time, many buildings and sites have remained underused, not able to take advantage of the premium location of this district. In 2011, Edina moved its public works facility into the district. The city’s investment in the area is noteworthy because it represents a progressive and enlightened approach to redevelopment. With geothermal, rooftop photovoltaics, extensive daylighting, stormwater bioswales, and other features, the site’s performance far exceeds its predecessor—while remaining industrial. This represents one possible outcome for the district— that is, to remain an employment area, but to do so in a manner that is restorative to the natural environment. An Area Full of Opportunity, and Possible Trade-Offs The possibilities of the Cahill District area have occupied people’s imaginations for years. In a community with as high land values as Edina’s, a change in policy could result in a major turnover of the sites in this location to another use—particularly one with higher values than the current industrial mix. There are many possible benefits that could result from redevelopment and/ or investment in the public realm in the area, including more attractive, livable, and connected public spaces and systems throughout the district • More businesses and services that are accessible to the public or serve other city needs • Improved sustainability and resilience of the built form, including development of integrated district systems • Connections to existing and planned parks and trails in the area through a green space network • A forward-thinking approach to economic development and business mix to meet city needs and support tax base At the same time, the area provides a broad range of unique and evolving services that meet the needs of Edina residents and businesses. As was observed during the 70th & Cahill planning process, redevelopment could lead to a permanent displacement of the current tenants to lower valued areas. The trade-offs associated with any development are significant. GRAPHIC #2: SHOWS DISTRICT DETAILS IN MORE GRANULAR DETAIL – BUILDING FOOT-PRINTS, INTERNAL CIRCULATION (OR LACK THEREOF), KEY LANDMARKS, LAND USE TYPESStreetsRail and Highways Parks and TrailsBuildingsThe Cahill District is made up of multiple layers and systems that interact with each other and their surroundings. A district plan will help align these systems so they are efficient, sustainable, and supportive of each other. SYSTEMS AND LAYERS OF THE CITY Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 3 Big Question: How Should the District Evolve and Contribute? Without a plan, the district will continue to evolve and change over time, but it may do so without achieving its potential to meet the broad needs of the community. The question is not whether the district should change; it is “How can the district evolve over the next 20 (plus) years such that it can contribute to the overall quality of life, economic prosperity, and environmental health of the community?” This question intentionally leaves open a broad interpretation of what it means to evolve and contribute. The district plan process will take a deep dive into these concepts with the public, city staff, and other stakeholders. We will highlight the tradeoffs, opportunities, and challenges and will work with the community to identify solutions that are creative, technically sound, implementable, and inspiring. Community-Centered Approach to Planning The Cahill District also has another great resource: its people. The project’s Working Group has already begun to convene and discuss the future of this district—and is already listing many goals and aspirations for what this area can be. As usual for Edina, we expect they will be bringing a wealth of ideas and expertise to the table, in addition to what the consultant team and city staff bring. We understand the need for frequent meetings during this planning process and anticipate robust and thoughtful discussion. To this end, our engagement approach will feature a community-driven design process that integrates our team’s technical expertise with participatory local visioning. In recognition of the size, scale, and significance of the Cahill District area, our team will facilitate two participatory design workshops. These workshops will offer the public space to become active participants in shaping the study as they write, draw, sketch, and scribble a desired future of how their community could look and feel. Our team will lead each workshop, using deep experience in engaging, approachable, and fun facilitation. Project Outcome: A Plan That Works for Edina The result of this process will be a plan that • Establishes a shared understanding of the economics, real estate, and physical attributes of the area • Identifies community goals for the district that reinforce the overall direction of the community as identified in the city’s comprehensive plan • Develops alternative futures for the district and evaluates them against community goals and technical criteria • Recommends a preferred direction for the district, supporting it with a transportation and open space plan and recommendation for district systems that enable the area to function effectively and efficiently • Establishes an implementation plan that allows property owners, residents, the city, and other stakeholders to implement the preferred plan over the next 20 years Information and Support Needed from Staff Consistent with the RFP, we anticipate City of Edina staff assisting in the following ways: • Serve as technical resource on areas where they have technical expertise, including ensuring access to available data and documents • Manage consultant contracts, including providing guidance and reviewing draft methodologies and documents • Schedule meetings for both District Area Working Group and public engagement • Coordinate marketing, communication, and messaging with the public • Ensure regulatory compliance, including any needed changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan resulting from this plan USES IN THE DISTRICT Though the district may appear to be simply “industrial” on a land use or zoning map, there is a great variety of buildings types and uses that attract and cater to local and regional businesses and households. Click for more info Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 4 UNIQUE SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE • Edina Experience – Our team unites consultant leads from seven recent planning processes in Edina, including the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, 70th & Cahill, 50th & France, 44th & France, Wooddale/Valley View, Grandview, and Southdale. We are familiar with the city’s people and priorities like few other teams could be. This familiarity covers everything from a solid understanding of available data to the culture of how the city does business to the expectations of the public around engagement. • Facilitation and Consensus-Building – Our team brings together decades of expertise in skilled communication and engagement. From our experience in Edina to dozens of other small area plans and similar projects, we welcome situations with complex needs and multiple conflicting priorities. Among many examples, Haila, Andrew, and Mike are working on master planning for the challenging and diverse community of Brooklyn Center— including formulation of community benefits agreements around a new model of an equitable, multicultural downtown district. • Infill Redevelopment Planning – Our whole team has worked separately and together for years on urban infill small area plans and master plans. From extensive work on Green Line and Green Line Extension LRT station area planning to master plans for new mixed-use industrial districts in Saint Paul and South Saint Paul, our team is deeply familiar with all aspects of planning for context-sensitive solutions in a community. This includes urban design, placemaking, systems analysis and planning, site planning, design-based engagement practices, rendering and visualization, zoning and regulatory updates, and implementation planning. • Industrial District Planning – As a planner for the City of Minneapolis, Haila spent a decade focusing on planning for the city’s industrial areas. Elements included both preservation of industrial areas and transition into other uses, site contamination and cleanup, preservation of industrial/jobs areas, public- private partnerships and funding, and mitigation of impacts on surrounding uses. Moreover, Janna brings decades of recognized expertise on metro area business and industrial district strategy and planning, including informing the foundation for how many cities think through a comprehensive approach to the issues. • District Systems Planning – District systems in urban areas are a challenging endeavor in that they require careful strategy to retrofit in solutions, and there are few models in the Twin Cities metro for how they function effectively in practice. Our team unites three leads (Haila, Andrew, and Bill) who worked on the innovative Towerside project in Prospect Park, which explored (and has partially implemented) solutions around district stormwater, public realm, energy, and parking. In- house support on the utility and water resource side can bring deeper subject matter expertise as needed for system design and implementation. • Holistic Business Development – Planning for a diverse industrial district requires a solid understanding of the economic significance of the area, in all the ways it contributes to the community, and the range of viable options. Our team brings expertise in working with developers, property owners, and business leaders to get a clear picture of these elements—as well as an understanding of the role it can (and should) play as part of an economically vibrant and sustainable Edina. In particular, Janna brings insights from outreach to Cahill area businesses and real estate development professionals during the comprehensive plan update. • Big Picture Thinkers – This is difficult to quantify, but we didn’t want to leave it off the list! When you get our team together, we are ready to brainstorm and conduct big picture thinking. While we know there are reasonable limits to what the transformation can be in this area, we expect the public to come with bold ideas. We are here to strategize with the community on how to achieve big dreams and/or provide thoughtful and nuanced answers to ideas that arise. FIRM PROFILE For a decade, Bolton & Menk’s planning and urban design group has helped clients plan and design their future. Rooted in robust public engagement, we facilitate consensus for buildable, sustainable solutions. Our team helps solve multifaceted problems with technical, regulatory, funding, and community expertise. We deliver plans and designs that work. In 2022, we are entering a new era, bringing planning, urban design, and placemaking to the forefront of what we do as a company. Through carefully planned strategic acquisitions, our team and expertise in these areas have expanded greatly in terms of staff, experience, and résumé. While still firmly grounded in our principles of local presence and long-term commitment to the area, we now have expanded capabilities in small area planning, master planning, transit-oriented development planning and design, private development planning and coordination, parks and open space planning, and urban design and placemaking. Alongside our existing services, we offer a comprehensive approach for communities looking to make their vision a reality to help create and maintain great places. We are joined by Biko Associates and Economic Development Services, our past Edina comprehensive plan collaborators. These two exceptional specialty firms provide depth and expertise in economic development, multimodal transportation, and engagement. As part of our commitment to equity, both our partners are DBE firms. Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 5 SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE Bolton & Menk has assembled an experienced team of professionals with a proven track record of delivering similar projects. We have highlighted several projects our team has delivered using a similar approach and/or with similar elements. We will draw upon this experience to benefit the Cahill Area District Plan. Additional project experience and references are available upon request. Comprehensive Plan Update and Small Area Planning, City of Edina, Minnesota When undertaking its 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, the City of Edina wanted to provide additional guidance for areas most likely to accommodate new growth. They preceded their comprehensive plan update with a series of small area plans for six locations—including 70th & Cahill, Southdale District, 50th & France, 44th & France, and Wooddale/Valley View. The plans covered all topics addressed in the comprehensive plan with detailed guidance on issues such as development type, scale, and intensity. The planning process involved a bridging element to ensure a previous visioning exercise was fully integrated into the plan update. Team Members Involved: Haila Maze, Sarah Lloyd, Bill Smith, Janna King Similarities to Cahill Area District Plan: • Located in Edina • 70th & Cahill Plan included • Same small area plan format Reference: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, City of Edina, 952-927-8861, cteague@EdinaMN.gov Towerside/Prospect Park LRT Station Area Planning, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota When planning for Green Line LRT, the area around the Stadium Village and Prospect Park stations was one of the biggest redevelopment opportunities along the line. While with the City of Minneapolis, Haila led a planning process to address the full range of complexity and diversity in the area. The resulting plan provided a bold vision for redevelopment around both LRT stations while protecting existing neighborhood character and supporting enhanced placemaking. Since the plan was adopted, there has been an influx of investment in the area with projects compatible with the plan, in partnership with the neighborhood led Towerside initiative. Team Members Involved: Haila Maze, Andrew Dresdner, Bill Smith Similarities to Cahill Area District Plan: • Industrial district redevelopment • Multiple competing demands for space • District system/sustainability planning • Transit and regional trail integration Reference: Dick Gilyard, Prospect Park/Towerside, 612-875-6407, gilyardrl@gmail.com Opportunity Site Redevelopment Plan, City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Faced with 80 acres of outdated commercial uses and oversized parking lots adjacent to the city’s largest park, Brooklyn Center has been working with Bolton & Menk to transition the land to its new city center. The redevelopment plan will establish a series of pedestrian scaled blocks and streets that will become the city’s downtown. The plan proposes a broad mix of uses including housing, urban manufacturing, retail, and a business incubator. The project includes development of district stormwater and other green infrastructure. Team Members Involved: Haila Maze, Andrew Dresdner, Mike Thompson Similarities to Cahill Area District Plan: • Commercial/industrial district redevelopment • Multiple competing demands for space • Community connectivity and district system • Focus on innovation, sustainability, and resilience Reference: Meg Beekman, Community Development Director, City of Brooklyn Center, MN, 763-569-3305, mbeekman@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us Click for work sample Click for work sample Click for work sample Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 6 McCaslin District Master Plan, City of Louisville, Colorado The McCaslin District Master Plan transformed Louisville’s original commercial/office district into a transit-oriented district with the introduction of housing civic uses, new parks, and reformatted retail. New circulation patterns improved access to local businesses while by shifting regional and pass through traffic to a nearby highway. The plan also includes recommendations for business retention and expansion by consolidating parcels and adjusting the zoning code to permit a greater usage of land and a greater degree of mixed uses. Team Members Involved: Andrew Dresdner (while at previous firm) Similarities to Cahill Area District Plan:• Redevelopment of aging business district• Integration of transit access• Regionally scaled employment district Reference: Troy Russ, Director of Community Development (former), City of Louisville, CO, 970-349-5338, truss@crestedbutte-co.gov Fiesta District Master Plan, City of Mesa, Arizona Built in the 1960s and 1970s when Mesa was expanding rapidly, the Fiesta District evolved as a commercial/retail oriented and auto-dominated district. Anchored by the Fiesta Mall, the district served the commercial needs of the growing community for 30 years. However, with changes in the economy and customer preferences, several of the mall’s anchors did not renew their lease, and the strip malls experienced declining rents and increasing vacancies. The plan is an ambitious approach to transform the district so it reestablishes its competitiveness in the region. The plan recommends a series of coordinated private/public investments designed to improve the public realm, create a safer and more accessible street, improve public safety, and introduce a new variety of uses into the district. Parking lots of the mall will be redeveloped with structured parking and a pedestrian retail street leading to the front of the mall. Strip malls will be replaced with new mid density housing and university uses. The main arterial will be narrowed, making space for pedestrian and transit amenities. Team Members Involved: Andrew Dresdner (while at previous firm) Similarities to Cahill Area District Plan:• Reuse of aging buildings• District stormwater• Mixed use with an employment focus Other Similar Small Area Plans • Texa-Tonka Small Area Plan, Saint Louis Park, MN • Robert St. Small Area Plan, West Saint Paul, MN • Hardman Small Area Plan, South Saint Paul, MN • Boulder Road Small Area Plan, Louisville, CO • Hillcrest Redevelopment Plan, Saint Paul, MN • Lowertown Small Area Plan, Saint Paul, MN • Downtown Small Area Plan, Monticello, MN • The Shipyard, Green Bay, WI • Rice Creek Commons Master Plan, Arden Hills, MN • Nicollet Island/East Bank Small Area Plan, Minneapolis, MN • Marcy-Holmes Neighborhood Master Plan, Minneapolis, MN • Above the Falls Master Plan, Minneapolis, MN • West Bank LRT Station Area Plan, Minneapolis, MN City of Edina Projects • France Avenue Sidewalk Improvements • 2021 Concrete Maintenance • Residential and Small Site Review • Minnehaha Creek Sanitary Sewer Lining • Aquatic Center - Various Projects • Fred Richards Park Entrance Review Industrial Land Use Projects • Dubuque Warehouse District Master Plan, Dubuque, IA • Southeast Minneapolis Industrial Land Use Study, Minneapolis, MN • Above the Falls Master Plan, Minneapolis, MN • Industrial Land Use Study, Brooklyn Center, MN • Industrial Land Use Study, Monticello, MN Click for work sample Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 7 PROJECT TEAM Bolton & Menk recognizes the value of a forward-looking project team that can anticipate project challenges, empathize with resident concerns, and build project consent through a creative and comprehensive analysis of alternatives. The team we propose for the Cahill Area District Plan has this experience. We have provided a brief background and description of key individual roles. These individuals have track records of successful projects and, just as importantly, are enthusiastic and committed to meeting and exceeding your expectations. Detailed résumés are available upon request. HAILA MAZE, AICP Project Manager As project manager, Haila will be responsible for client communication, project oversight, and scope/schedule management. As a principal planner, Haila is committed to planning and project management services that support the long-term success of our client communities. She began her planning career in 1998 and has extensive experience with local and regional land planning projects, including comprehensive, small area, and transit station area plans, as well as heritage preservation, health, and arts-related studies. ANDREW DRESDNER, AICP Lead Planner Andrew will serve as lead planner. Andrew is a senior urban designer at Bolton & Menk whose professional career began in 1998. His expertise spans urban design, redevelopment planning, community development, public space design, and placemaking. Andrew appreciates the interdisciplinary approach to project solutions that Bolton & Menk uses, as well as the willingness to bring innovation to all projects. MIKE THOMPSON, AICP Planner Mike will assist with preparation of all planning elements and public engagement efforts. Mike is an urban planner who began his career in 2012. Having worked in community planning and urban design efforts across the country, he has a broad spectrum of experience, including project management and evaluation, public engagement facilitation, community-based research, urban design review and presentation, and facilitating tactical urbanism installations. Mike loves the process of working with communities to rethink and redesign the ways in which their neighborhoods look, feel, and function, all while promoting places that are inviting to all people. SARAH LLOYD, PE Client Service Manager, Municipal Expert As client service manager, Sarah serves as a resource to Edina. On this project, she will provide expertise in municipal services and systems. Sarah collaborates with clients to come up with solutions and help them achieve their goals. She is a project manager who began her engineering career in 1996. Her experience includes a variety of engineering tasks including the preparation of preliminary engineering reports, final design, plan and specification production, cost estimating, and construction management. TIM OLSON, PE, CFM Green Infrastructure Tim will be responsible for conceptual green infrastructure design elements. He will also assist with water resources engineering elements of the plan, including utility and stormwater management evaluation and planning. Tim is a principal water resources engineer who joined Bolton & Menk in 2006. His experience includes project management in both design and construction of complex water resources and environmentally sensitive projects. He specializes in comprehensive surface water management planning, innovative best management practice design, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, drainage design and construction plan review, and NPDES Phase I & II MS4 and construction stormwater permitting requirements. JOSH SHIELDS, PLA Landscape Architect Josh will be responsible for open space and trail design elements. Josh is a senior project landscape architect dedicated to assisting clients develop sustainable solutions for their communities. He began his career in 2004 and his work experience in master planning, parks and recreational design, and urban design encompasses the entire life cycle of many projects—from visioning, design development, fundraising, construction, and maintenance. BILL SMITH, AICP BIKO ASSOCIATES Transportation Planner Bill will support both transportation and public engagement efforts, translating technical analysis into publicly accessible information. Bill, a principal with Biko Associates, Inc., is a professional planner with more than 35 years of experience. Bill founded Biko Associates 28 years ago after working for BRW, Inc. as a senior transportation planner. Bill has focused his practice on relationships between land use and transportation and development of location-specific transportation system improvements that both meet transportation demand and contribute to sustainable communities. Bill served as project manager on the 70th & Cahill Small Area Plan and the 2040 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update. JANNA KING, CEcD, EDFP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Economic Development Professional Janna will support economic development efforts, convening subject matter experts and researching market conditions. Janna established Economic Development Services, Inc. in 1994 and has completed projects in more than 125 communities in 11 states. Her areas of specialization include: comprehensive planning; development and redevelopment area planning; downtown and commercial corridor revitalization; transportation, transit, and economic development; and economic development strategic planning. Janna was retained by the Metropolitan Council to integrate economic competitiveness and economic development into the Thrive MSP 2040 planning process. Subsequently, she worked as part of the Biko Associates team on the 2040 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update. Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 8 Project Cost The following table summarizes the hours and cost breakdown for each major work task item. The estimated fee includes labor, general business, and other normal and customary expenses associated with operating a professional business. Unless otherwise noted, the fees include vehicle and personal expenses, mileage, telephone, survey stakes, and routine expendable supplies; no separate charges will be made for these activities and materials. Expenses beyond the agreed scope of services and non-routine expenses, such as large quantities of prints, extra report copies, out-sourced graphics and photographic reproductions, document recording fees, outside professional and technical assistance, and other items of this general nature will be invoiced separately. This is an initial estimate subject to negotiation. Greater detail is available upon request. Roles and Responsibilities Project Expectations Measurements of Success Workshop #1: Existing Conditions and Goals Interviews and Expert Panels Optional: Support Working Group with Boards and commissions Preliminary Physical Analysis Policy Analysis Economics and Real Estate Analysis Preparation for Public Event #1 Debrief and Recap of Public Event #1 Community Goals for the District Evaluation Methodology 1 1 Workshop #2: Development Alternatives2 2 3 1 Survey1 Survey1 2 3 Interviews and Expert Panels 4 5 6 4 7 8 9 5Three Alternative Futures Preparation for Community Event #2 6Recap of Community Event #2Synthesis and Evaluation of Alternative Futures Preferred AlternativeSupporting District Systems Preparation for Public Event #3 Recap of Community Event #3Refinements to the Preferred Alternative Introduction to Implementation Presentation of Final PlanPHASE 1Area Profile and Trend Analysis WORKING GROUP AGENDAS ENGAGEMENT PHASE 2 Issue/Analysis & Evaluation of Alternatives PHASE 3 Preferred Alternative and Final Plan PROJECT COST AND TIMELINE Task No.Work Task Description Total Hours Total Cost 1.0 Project Management and Engagement Planning 152 $23,420 2.0 Current Area Profile and Trend Analysis 102 $15,000 3.0 Issue/Conflict Analysis and Alternative Evaluation 110 $15,690 4.0 Preferred Alternative and Final Plan 140 $20,830 Total Hours 504 Total Not-to-Exceed Fee $74,940 Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 9 PROJECT APPROACH Bolton & Menk will provide outstanding technical deliverables, exceptional leadership in public and stakeholder involvement, and superior project management in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our team’s approach builds on an already tested planning and design process of close involvement with the District Area Working Group. Our engagement with the Working Group will ensure that they are significantly involved in visioning and goal setting, issue definition, alternatives development, and the selection of preferred alternatives. We will further ensure that the Working Group is actively involved in steps to engage the community through the planning and implementation of engagement activities. It is our intent that at the conclusion of the Cahill District Area Plan process, each Working Group member will own the plan and will be a champion for its adoption, and each community member who wishes to participate will be able to say, “I was heard.” Project Management and Engagement Planning Project management activities will be conducted throughout the entire project. These activities will include communication with city staff, managing consultant team activities, and ensuring quality and adherence to schedule and budget. We will manage all project administration, coordination, timely document delivery, meeting preparation and convening, and QA/QC planning and functions. This will include regular check-ins with city staff as needed throughout the duration of the planning process. Our team will work with the District Area Working Group to develop and implement an effective community engagement plan. The plan will take a frontline position with the community and stakeholders to generate project interest, build community rapport, and facilitate a high level of participation in understanding and shaping the project. While the details will be determined during the planning process, we anticipate that this will include: • A series of nine facilitated Working Group meetings, organized around project progression and milestones • Detailed analysis of stakeholder groups, including area of interest and best means to reach them • Two interactive public design workshops—one focused on existing conditions and development options, the second on draft plan concepts • Up to two online surveys to solicit broader public feedback on goals and preferences • Up to six interviews and expert panel convenings of property owners, developers, and real estate professionals • Communication materials to publicize events, including website content, draft social media posts, email content, and project one-pagers • “Meeting in a box” materials to allow the Working Group, city staff, and/or other community groups to facilitate additional discussions and bring back comments • As-needed coordination with resources agencies—e.g., watershed, Three Rivers Park District, Metro Transit, etc. We hope to have as many engagement events in person as possible, to maximize involvement and interactivity. However, if due to unforeseen public health circumstances this must switch to online, we are ready to transition to a suite of online interactive tools we have been developing over the past two years of COVID-era engagement. Phase 1: Current Area Profile and Trend Analysis Phase 1 focuses on developing a shared set of facts, analysis, and insight to the Working Group and the general public. Our analysis will encompass both the broader systems that impact the district, as well as the finer grained property level issues. We will examine the physical attributes of the district, the economic and real estate dynamics, as well as the established policy directions from all relevant agencies. Additionally, this will include a forecast and trend analysis, covering future projected population and job growth, demographic changes, and relevant economic and environmental trends and challenges that may impact the area in the future. This will cover both the conditions of private property, as well as public infrastructure and public realm. The transportation and economic analysis elements will leverage the expertise of Biko Associates and Economic Development Services respectively. Trends to be considered will include (but not be limited to): • Real estate market conditions, including demand by market sector, the district’s market position, and changes in how space is being used • Environmental conditions, including climate change, that will impact the area— particularly through stormwater and heat island effects • Multimodal transportation considerations, from the role of transit and nonmotorized travel to the relationship with delivery services due to online shopping Engagement: Public Workshop #1 – Present existing conditions and goals. This will focus on exploring community goals and priorities in the context of conditions and possibilities. It will include a SWOT analysis type exercise, with the intent of identifying community goals, and addressing potential conflicts and challenges in meeting them. We will conduct developer/property owner targeted outreach, including expert panel and individual interviews. We will include online engagement via web-ready content for website/social media and an online preference survey to surface and prioritize goals. Deliverables: Current area profile and trend analysis report Cahill Area District Plan | City of Edina 10 Phase 2: Issue/Conflict Analysis and Evaluation of Alternatives With a strong analysis (physical, economic, and policy) at a variety of scales we will work with city staff and the Working Group to develop alternative future scenarios for the district as well as an evaluation methodology. This will include an issue/conflict analysis that explores competing demands and priorities for this limited space—and what goals and criteria can be used to effectively evaluate them. The alternatives to be developed will include • Type and intensity of development to be considered within the study area • Open space and public amenity opportunities • Bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and other multimodal accommodations, including regional trail connections • Management of transition zones and connection with adjacent land uses • Strategies towards realizing goals of sustainability and resilience Engagement: Public Workshop #2 – Present development alternatives. This will focus on exploring future scenarios for how the area can redevelop, and how this can embody the community goals and needs, while still being reflective and responsive to broader trends. Participants will help surface, review, and refine options interactively. We will include online engagement via web-ready content for website/social media and an online visual preference survey to review and evaluate development alternatives. Deliverables: Draft goals and alternatives framework, materials for public meeting and engagement summary Phase 3: Preferred Alternative and Final Plan Incorporating public feedback from Phase 2, we will develop a preferred alternative for the district. This alternative may resemble one of the alternatives from Phase 2, or it may be a hybrid. The preferred alternative will be further developed with potential to integrate district systems (energy, transportation, stormwater, etc.) as well as renderings to describe the character and image of new development. Subsequently, our team will draft a district area plan document, covering the following elements: • Values, Trends and Assessments – SWOT analysis and identification of strongly held community values • Visioning and Issue Identification – Descriptive statements of what the community aspirates to in the future, with conflict/challenge analysis • Strategy Formulation – Major programs, initiatives or actions should be identified to address key issues, including land use, and to move the community towards its shared vision; the strategy should assign accountability and a timeframe for action steps. Mirroring the comprehensive plan and other small area plans, this district area plan will include an introduction; vision, goals, and objectives; district profile; land use and community design; housing; economic competitiveness and economic development; heritage preservation; transportation; parks, open space, and natural resources; energy and environment; and an implementation plan. Each chapter will have background and current conditions, trends and challenges, and specific goals and tactics. Engagement: Provide "Meeting in a box” materials for draft review of the plan at boards, commissions, city council, and other convenings to be completed by city staff and Working Group members. We will also provide a web-ready version of content for the website, with the ability to provide comments and markups. Deliverables: Draft and final plan document with supporting exhibits Potential Adjustments and Considerations for Alternatives to the Approach While we think this scope is sufficient to cover the assigned tasks, we acknowledge there may be desire in the community to have additional public meetings, to allow for more iterations and refinements of the concepts. We are open to exploring this with the Working Group, and to either re-prioritizing scope items or providing cost estimates for additional engagement activities. Beyond the nine Working Group meetings and two community meetings outlined in the RFP, we also could be available to assist with the facilitation of the Working Group’s involvement with the city’s boards and commissions. We feel this extra step in the process may be important in order to ensure that the district plan contributes to and is consistent with already adopted goals. This could include informal discussions as well as formal presentations. Client: City of EdinaTask No.Work Task DescriptionHaila MazeAndrew DresdnerMike ThompsonSarah LloydTim OlsonJosh ShieldsGIS Specialist/ GraphicsBill SmithJanna KingTotal HoursTotal Cost1.0 Project Management and Engagement Planning 38 34 26 0 0 0 16 4 34 152 $23,4202.0 Current Area Profile and Trend Analysis 10 14 28 4 4 2 20 18 2 102 $15,0003.0 Issue/Conflict Analysis and Alternative Evaluation 14 16 32 0 0 0 32 10 6 110 $15,6904.0 Preferred Alternative and Final Plan 12 28 40 2 2 6 26 12 12 140 $20,830Total Hours74 92 126 6 6 8 94 44 54 504Average Hourly Rate$160.00 $175.00 $140.00 $185.00 $180.00 $170.00 $120.00 $140.00 $155.00Subtotal$11,840 $16,100 $17,640 $1,110 $1,080 $1,360 $11,280 $6,160 $8,370$74,940Detailed Cost EstimateTotal Not‐to‐Exceed FeeBolton & Menk, Inc.Project: Cahill Area District Plan Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Approve Amendment to Public Health Software Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve amendment to Public Health software contract agreement with Tyler Technologies. INTRODUCTION: This previously approved Public Health software from Tyler Technologies is being implemented and some adjustments to the existing contract agreement between the City and Tyler are necessary. Some products and services included in the initial agreement are not necessary for operation and have been removed resulting in a reduced cost. ATTACHMENTS: Description Amendment Contract 1 AMENDMENT This amendment (“Amendment”) is effective as of the date of signature of the last party to sign as indicated below (“Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Tyler Technologies, Inc. with offices at One Tyler Drive, Yarmouth, Maine 04096 (“Tyler”) and the City of Edina, Minnesota, with offices at 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394 (“Client”). WHEREAS, Tyler and Client are parties to an agreement dated October 15, 2019 (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Tyler and Client desire to amend the terms of the Agreement as provided herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter contained, Tyler and Client agree as follows: 1. Tyler 311/Incident Management. a. The Tyler 311/Incident Management Tyler Software is hereby removed from the Agreement as of the Amendment Effective Date. Upon such date, Client’s license for such software is terminated, as are Tyler’s obligations to support, maintain, and update such software. b. Client shall short-pay Invoice No. 045-382118 by $4,297.73. Client is not responsible for paying the remaining 20% of the license fees for such software. 2. EnerGov Business Management. a. The EnerGov Business Management Suite (13) Tyler Software is hereby removed from the Agreement as of the Amendment Effective Date. Upon such date, Client’s license for such software is terminated, as are Tyler’s obligations to support, maintain, and update such software. b. In recognition of license fees paid to Tyler for such software, Tyler hereby issues to Client a credit of $19,305. At Client’s direction, Tyler will apply the credit issued herein to software license fees payable to Tyler for any Tyler Software Products hereafter acquired by Client. This Amendment, upon execution, shall serve as Client’s documentation for the credit issued (the executed Amendment is your credit invoice from Tyler). c. Client shall short-pay Invoice No. 045-382118 by $8,775. Client is not responsible for paying the remaining 20% of the license fees for such software. 3. The following unused services are hereby removed from the Agreement: a. 264 Implementation hours, at a contract price of: $46,200; 2 b. EnerGov Business Management – Conversion, at a contract price of: $12,925; and c. Year 1 Maintenance – EnerGov Business Management Suite, at a contract price of: $0 4. EnerGov Decision Engine. a. The following Tyler Software as a Service (SaaS) are hereby removed from the Agreement as of October 15, 2022: EnerGov Decision Engine b. As of such date, Client’s right to access the above-listed software is terminated, as are Tyler’s obligations to maintain, support, host and update such software. c. Client’s annual SaaS fees payment obligation commencing October 15, 2022 is hereby reduced by $11,587.50 with respect to the removal of the above-listed software. 5. The items set forth in the sales quotation attached as Exhibit 1 to this Amendment are hereby added to the Agreement as of the Amendment Effective Date. Payment of fees and costs for such items shall conform to the following terms: a. License Fees. License fees will be invoiced on the date when Tyler provides the Client with access to the applicable Tyler Software (the “Software Access Date”). b. Maintenance Fees. Year 1 maintenance and support fees are waived through the earlier of (a) availability of the Tyler Software for use in a live production environment; or (b) one (1) year from the Effective Date. Year 2 maintenance and support fees, at our then- current rates, are payable on that earlier-of date, and subsequent maintenance and support fees are invoiced annually in advance of each anniversary thereof. Your fees for each subsequent year will be set at our then-current rates. c. Tyler Systems Management Fees. The year 1 Tyler Systems Management fee is due on the renewal date of the existing Tyler Systems Management term. d. SaaS Fees. The first year’s annual SaaS Fees shall be invoiced on the first day of the first month following the Amendment Effective Date, prorated for the time period commencing on such date and ending concurrently with the Client’s annual SaaS Term under the Agreement. Subsequent SaaS Fees shall be invoiced in accord with the terms of the Agreement. e. Services Fees & Expenses. Services added to the Agreement pursuant to this Amendment, along with applicable expenses, shall be invoiced as provided and/or incurred. 6. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. 7. Except as expressly indicated in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the dates set forth below. Tyler Technologies, Inc. City of Edina, Minnesota By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Exhibit 1 1 Exhibit 1 Amendment Investment Summary The following Amendment Investment Summary details the software and services to be delivered by us to you under this Amendment. This Amendment Investment Summary is effective as of the Amendment Effective Date. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement. In the event a comment in the following sales quotation conflicts with a provision of this Amendment, the provision in this Amendment shall control. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2022-331398-W9S2N6 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 Quoted By:Alban Michaud Quote Expiration:12/26/22 Quote Name:City of Edina-ERP-EnerGov Change Order Quote Description: Change Order _ Environmental Services Sales Quotation For: City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina MN 55424-1394 Phone: +1 (952) 927-8861 Tyler License Fees and Related Services Description Qty License Hours Module Total Year One Maintenance Additional Civic Access - Environmental Health 1 $ 22,570.00 24 $ 20,313.00 $ 4,514.00 EnerGov Core Foundation Bundle 1 $ 5,500.00 24 $ 4,950.00 $ 1,100.00 Enterprise Environmental Health (Standalone)13 $ 39,000.00 264 $ 35,100.00 $ 7,800.00 GIS 13 $ 6,500.00 8 $ 5,850.00 $ 1,300.00 Sub-Total $ 73,570.00 $ 66,213.00 $ 14,714.00 Less Discount $ 7,357.00 $ 14,714.00 TOTAL $ 66,213.00 320 $ 66,213.00 $ 0.00 Tyler SaaS and Related Services Description Qty Imp. Hours Annual Fee Additional EnerGov Advanced Automation Bundle 1 40 $ 22,918.00 2022-331398-W9S2N6 CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 Sub-Total:$ 22,918.00 Less Discount:$ 2,292.00 TOTAL 40 $ 20,626.00 Tyler Annual Services Description QTY Imp. Hours Annual Fee Recurring Services System Management Services Contract 1 0 $ 3,679.00 TOTAL:0 $ 3,679.00 Professional Services Description Quantity Unit Price Ext Discount Extended Price Maintenance Implementation for Credit Card API for Invoice Cloud 40 $ 175.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Project Management 56 $ 175.00 $ 0.00 $ 9,800.00 $ 0.00 Standard Reports 1 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Conversions – See Detailed Breakdown Below $ 12,925.00 $ 0.00 Remote Implementation 360 $ 175.00 $0.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 85,725.00 $ 0.00 Summary One Time Fees Recurring Fees Total Tyler License Fees $ 66,213.00 $ 0.00 Total SaaS $ 0.00 $ 20,626.00 Total Tyler Services $ 85,725.00 $ 3,679.00 Total Third-Party Hardware, Software, Services $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Summary Total $ 151,938.00 $ 24,305.00 2022-331398-W9S2N6 CONFIDENTIAL Page 3 Contract Total $ 172,564.00 Estimated Travel Expenses excl in Contract Total $ 1,050.00 Unless otherwise indicated in the contract or amendment thereto, pricing for optional items will be held For six (6) months from the Quote date or the Effective Date of the Contract, whichever is later. Customer Approval:Date: Print Name:P.O.#: All Primary values quoted in US Dollars Detailed Breakdown of Conversions (Included in Summary Total) Description Qty Unit Price Unit Discount Extended Price Professional Services Environmental Health - Conversion 1 $ 12,925.00 $ 0.00 $ 12,925.00 TOTAL $ 12,925.00 Tyler License Fee Discount Detail (Excludes Optional Products) Description License Liense Discount License Net Maintenance Basis Year One Maint Discount Year One Maint Net Additional Civic Access - Environmental Health $ 22,570.00 $ 2,257.00 $ 20,313.00 $ 4,514.00 $ 4,514.00 $ 0.00 EnerGov Core Foundation Bundle $ 5,500.00 $ 550.00 $ 4,950.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 0.00 2022-331398-W9S2N6 CONFIDENTIAL Page 4 Enterprise Environmental Health (Standalone)$ 39,000.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 35,100.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 0.00 GIS $ 6,500.00 $ 650.00 $ 5,850.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 0.00 TOTAL $ 73,570.00 $ 7,357.00 $ 66,213.00 $ 14,714.00 $ 14,714.00 $ 0.00 Tyler Annual Discount Detail (Excludes Optional Products) Description Annual Fee Annual Fee Discount Annual Fee Net Additional EnerGov Advanced Automation Bundle $ 22,918.00 $ 2,292.00 $ 20,626.00 Recurring Services System Management Services Contract $ 3,679.00 $ 0.00 $ 3,679.00 TOTAL $ 26,597.00 $ 2,292.00 $ 24,305.00 Comments Client agrees that items in this sales quotation are, upon Client's signature or approval of same, hereby added to the existing agreement ("Agreement") between the parties and subject to its terms. Additionally, payment for said items, as applicable but subject to any listed assumptions herein, shall conform to the following terms: •License fees for Tyler and third party software are invoiced upon the earlier of (i) deliver of the license key or (ii) when Tyler makes such software available for download by the Client; •Fees for hardware are invoiced upon delivery; •Fees for year one of hardware maintenance are invoiced upon delivery of the hardware; •Annual Maintenance and Support fees, SaaS fees, Hosting fees, and Subscription fees are first payable when Tyler makes the software available for download by the Client (for Maintenance) or on the first day of the month following the date this quotation was signed (for SaaS, Hosting, and Subscription), and any such fees are prorated to align with the applicable term under the Agreement, with renewals invoiced annually thereafter in accord with the Agreement. •Fees for services included in this sales quotation shall be invoiced as indicated below. •Implementation and other professional services fees shall be invoiced as delivered. •Fixed-fee Business Process Consulting services shall be invoiced 50% upon delivery of the Best Practice Recommendations, by module, and 50% upon delivery of custom desktop procedures, by module. •Fixed-fee conversions are invoiced 50% upon initial delivery of the converted data, by conversion option, and 50% upon Client acceptance to load the converted data into Live/Production environment, by conversion option. Where conversions are quoted as estimated, Tyler will invoice Client the actual services delivered on a time and materials basis. •Except as otherwise provided, other fixed price services are invoiced upon complete delivery of the service. For the avoidance of doubt, 2022-331398-W9S2N6 CONFIDENTIAL Page 5 where "Project Planning Services" are provided, payment shall be invoiced upon delivery of the Implementation Planning document. Dedicated Project Management services, if any, will be invoiced monthly in arrears, beginning on the first day of the month immediately following initiation of project planning. •If Client has purchased any change management services, those services will be invoiced in accordance with the Agreement. •Notwithstanding anything to the contrary stated above, the following payment terms shall apply to services fees specifically for migrations: Tyler will invoice Client 50% of any Migration Fees listed above upon Client approval of the product suite migration schedule. The remaining 50%, by line item, will be billed upon the go-live of the applicable product suite. Tyler will invoice Client for any Project Management Fees listed above upon the go-live of the first product suite. Unless otherwise indicated on this Sales quotation, annual services will be invoiced in advance, for annual terms commencing on the date this sales quotation is signed by the Client. If listed annual service(s) is an addition to the same service presently existing under the Agreement, the first term of the added annual service will be prorated to expire coterminous with the existing annual term for the service, with renewals to occur as indicated in the Agreement. •Expenses associated with onsite services are invoiced as incurred. Tyler's quote contains estimates of the amount of services needed, based on our preliminary understanding of the scope, level of engagement, and timeline as defined in the Statement of Work (SOW) for your project. The actual amount of services required may vary, based on these factors. Tyler's pricing is based on the scope of proposed products and services contracted from Tyler. Should portions of the scope of products or services be altered by the Client, Tyler reserves the right to adjust prices for the remaining scope accordingly. Unless otherwise noted, prices submitted in the quote do not include travel expenses incurred in accordance with Tyler's then-current Business Travel Policy. Tyler's prices do not include applicable local, city or federal sales, use excise, personal property or other similar taxes or duties, which you are responsible for determining and remitting. Installations are completed remotely but can be done onsite upon request at an additional cost. In the event Client cancels services less than two (2) weeks in advance, Client is liable to Tyler for (i) all non-refundable expenses incurred by Tyler on Client's behalf; and (ii) daily fees associated with the cancelled services if Tyler is unable to re-assign its personnel. The Implementation Hours included in this quote assume a work split effort of 70% Client and 30% Tyler. Implementation Hours are scheduled and delivered in four (4) or eight (8) hour increments. Tyler provides onsite training for a maximum of 12 people per class. In the event that more than 12 users wish to participate in a training class or more than one occurrence of a class is needed, Tyler will either provide additional days at then-current rates for training or Tyler will utilize a Train-the-Trainer approach whereby the client designated attendees of the initial training can thereafter train the remaining users. 2022-331398-W9S2N6 CONFIDENTIAL Page 6 Standard Project Management responsibilities include project plan creation, initial stakeholder presentation, bi-weekly status calls, updating of project plan task statuses, and go-live planning activities. Tyler's System Management Services is calculated at 25% of the Enterprise ERP annual maintenance. There is a $2,500 minimum annual fee. Systems Management Services are invoiced when you sign this sales quotation and are provided in accordance with the terms of service for Tyler Systems Management found here: https://www.tylertech.com/terms/tyler-systems-management-terms-of-service. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2022-14: Amending Chapter 2 of the City Code Setting License Fee for THC-Infused Edibles and Drinks Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance No. 2022-14 amending Chapter 2 of the City Code setting license fee for T HC-infused edibles and drinks, and grant first reading. INTRODUCTION: After passage of the ordinance allowing licensed establishment sales of THC-infused edibles and drinks, an annual license fee must be added to the City fee schedule. T his ordinance adds that license fee for sales of THC-infused edible and drink products. The initial license fee will be $700.00. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2022-14 Amending Chapter 2 of the City Code setting license fees for THC-infused edibles and drinks. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE SETTING LICENSE FEE FOR EDIBLE THC-INFUSED EDIBLES AND DRINKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The fees of Schedule A in City Code Chapter 2, Section 2-724 are amended to include the following: Chapter and Purpose of Fee Section 2021 Fee Proposed 2022 Fee Chapter 12 12-542 THC-Infused Edibles and Drinks Sale License Not Applicable $700.00 Section 2: This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication. First Reading: October 6, 2022 Second Reading: Published: Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT SEND ONE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2022-15: Amending City Code Chapter 12 Regarding Tobacco Compliance Penalties Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance No. 2022-15 amending City Code Chapter 12 regarding Tobacco Compliance Penalties, and grant first reading. INTRODUCTION: This ordinance will amend the penalties for failed compliance checks by licensed tobacco retailers in the City. The new language brings City Code into alignment with Minnesota Statute 461.12 which regulates municipal licensing of tobacco sales. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2022-15 Amending City Code Chapter 12 regarding tobacco compliance penalties 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES FOR TOBACCO VIOLATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 12, Section 12-282 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: The following administrative penalties will be applied as set forth in this section: (1) Licensees. Any licensee found to have violated this article, or whose employee shall have violated this article, shall be charged an administrative fine of: a. $300.00 for the first violation of this article; b. $600.00 for the second violation at the same licensed premises within a 36-month period; c. $1,000.00 for a third violation at the same location within a 36-month period. In addition, after the third violation, the license shall be suspended for a period of seven days. d. $1,000.00 for a fourth violation at the same location within a 36-month period. In addition, after the fourth violation, the license shall be revoked. (2) Other individuals. Other individuals, other than minors regulated by subsection (3) of this section, found to be in violation of this article shall be charged an administrative fee of $50.00. (3) Underage persons. Persons under 21 years of age who use false identification to purchase or attempt to purchase, tobacco, tobacco-related products or tobacco-related devices shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be required to attend tobacco free education programs or court diversion programs. (4) Misdemeanor. Nothing in this article shall prohibit the city from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any violation of this article. Section 2. This ordinance is effective following passage and publication. First Reading: October 6, 2022 2 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No 2022-16: Repealing Ordinance 2022-06 an Interim Ordinance Prohibiting the Sale, Testing, Manufacturing, and Distribution of THC Products Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance No. 2022-16 repealing Ordinance 2022-06, an interim ordinance prohibiting the sale, testing, manufacturing, and distribution of THC products, grant first reading and waive second reading. INTRODUCTION: This ordinance will repeal the interim moratorium on the sale of THC edibles and drinks in the City of Edina, as the City has adopted an ordinance to establish a licensing and compliance system for these products. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2022-16: An Ordinance Repealing Ordinance 2022-06 An Interim Ordinance Prohibiting the Sale, Testing, Manufacturing, and Distribution of TCH Products 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-16 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 2022-06 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE SALE, TESTING, MANUFACTURING, AND DISTRIBUTION OF THC PRODUCTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Background: A. Minn. Stat. 462.355, subd. 4, provides that a municipality may adopt an interim ordinance for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and general welfare of its residents. Minn. Stat. §412.221, subd. 32 provides that a City is authorized to regulate any use in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. B. The City Council adopted Ordinance 2022-06, an interim ordinance prohibiting the sale, testing, manufacturing, and distribution of THC Products for one year. That ordinance became effective on August 3, 2022. C. City staff and the City Council studied and reviewed whether and how the City could implement local licensing sufficient to regulate the presence of legal THC Products in the community. Such study efforts included examining similar regulations in other communities, determining whether there was a need for licensing or permitting on this subject, and reviewing the legislative and policy options regarding this emerging market. D. On September 20, 2022, City Council adopted Ordinance 2022-12, an ordinance establishing a municipal licensing and regulatory system for THC Products, which establishes a licensing system for THC Product retailers in the City. E. An interim ordinance prohibiting the sale of THC products in the City is no longer necessary because the City has now implemented a licensing ordinance regulating the sale of these products. 2 Section 2. Repeal: Ordinance 2022-06, an interim ordinance prohibiting the sale, testing, manufacturing, and distribution of THC Products is repealed in its entirety. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Ordinance No. 2022-10: Amending Chapters 10 and 24 Concerning Residential Tree Protection Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance 2022-10, amending Chapters 10 and 24 of the Edina City Code regarding Residential Tree Protection, and grant second reading. INTRODUCTION: Council received first reading of Ordinance 2022-10 Sept. 7, 2022. Based on Council feedback during first reading, the following changes were implemented for second reading and approval: Section 2, Chapter 24, Article I existing Definitions has been included for context; Section 4, part "d" text has been moved to Section 3, 24-3; Section 3, 24-4 has been removed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance 2022-10: Residential Tree Protection Staff Report: Residential Tree Protection EEC Report: Residential Tree Protection ETC Advisory Communication PD Advisory Communication Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING TREE PROTECTION The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 10, Article III of the Edina City Code is amended to add Division 3 as follows: DIVISION III. TREE PROTECTION Sec. 10-82. Preservation, protection and replacement of Protected Trees: This Division applies to: grading permits, demolition permits; subdivisions applications; building permit applications for principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck or a pool; and additions to principal and accessory structures. This Division does not apply to City parkland, which follows tree protection guidelines outlined in Edina’s Comprehensive Plan and City Park Master Plan. (1) Purpose: Edina is fortunate to have a robust inventory of mature trees that form an integral part of the unique character and history of the city, and that contribute to the long-term aesthetic, environmental, and economic well-being of the city. The goal of this Section is to preserve Edina’s high valued trees, while allowing reasonable development to take place and not interfere with how existing property owners use their property. The purpose of the ordinance is to: a. Preserve and grow Edina’s tree canopy cover by protecting mature trees throughout the city. b. Protect and enhance property values by conserving and adding to the distinctive and unique aesthetic character of Edina’s tree population. c. Protect and enhance the distinctive character of Edina’s neighborhoods d. Improve the quality of life for all stakeholders, including city residents, visitors and wildlife. e. Protect the environment by the filtering of air and soil pollutants, increasing oxygen levels and reducing CO2; preventing and reducing erosion and stormwater by stabilizing soils; reducing heat convection; decreasing wind speeds; reducing noise pollution and decreasing the urban heat island effect. f. Protect and maintain healthy trees in the development and building permit processes as set forth herein; and prevent tree loss by eliminating or reducing compacted fill and excavation near tree roots. (2) Definitions: a. Protected Tree: Any tree that is structurally sound and healthy, and that meets one of the following: i. a deciduous tree that is at least 8 5 inches dbh, except box elders, Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 2 poplar, willow, silver maple, black locust, fruit tree species, ash, and mulberry. ii. a coniferous tree that is at least 20 15 feet in height. b. Removable Tree. Any tree not defined as a Protected Tree, and as defined as an invasive species by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. c. Critical Root Zone. The minimum area around a tree that is left undisturbed. The critical root radius is calculated by measuring the tree’s diameter at breast height. For each inch of tree diameter, 1.5 feet of root zone radius must be protected. For example, if a tree’s dbh is 10 inches, then its critical root zone radius is 15 feet (10 x 1.5 = 15). If the critical root zone of a tree on site or an adjacent property must be disturbed for construction or construction activity, a plan for the disturbance shall be submitted as part of the Tree Protection Plan subject to review and approval of the city forester to minimize the damage. d. Diameter at Breast Height (dbh). The dbh shall be measured at a height of 4.6 feet. e. Transplanted Tree. A protected tree which is removed from a lot and replanted to another private lot or a public space in Edina. f. Heritage Tree. A protected deciduous tree above 30” dbh and a protected coniferous tree taller than 30 feet. (3) Applications for all permit types identified in Sec 10-82 must include a tree protection plan indicating where Protected and Heritage Trees are located and, their species, caliper, and health. The plan must show how Protected and Heritage Trees are preserved and protected during construction. The plan must also show if any Protected or Heritage Trees are proposed to be removed and the location, species and size of all replacement tree(s). The Tree Protection Plan should be coordinated with the Stormwater Management Plan; proposed and protected trees should be shown on the stormwater management plan to ensure no conflicts. (4) If a Protected Tree is removed, except as allowed for in paragraph (5), it must be replaced with one (1) tree trees equal to at least 75% of the deciduous dbh and 75% of the coniferous height in feet, as applicable , subject to the following conditions: a. Protected trees must be replaced with species of a similar type (deciduous or coniferous) according to Part 11 that are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in Hennepin County’s “Recommended Tree List” . on the list of acceptable replacement species on file with the city forester. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 3 b. Replacement trees must be varied by species. b. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are allowed. c. Replacement trees must be at least three and one-half inches (23.5”) in caliper for deciduous trees and a minimum of eight feet (78’) tall for coniferous trees. d. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the City Forester before implementation. e. The tree protection plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for the building permit. f. If the city determines that there is no appropriate location for some or all the required replacement trees, those trees will not be required on site. f. Failure to replace protected trees on site results in a payment fee of $300 per dbh below 75% of the dbh removed, or $300 per coniferous foot below 75% of the foot removed. (5) Protected Trees may be removed without mitigation, in the following areas: a. Including, and within a ten-foot (10’) radius of, the building pad, deck or patio of a new or remodeled building. b. Including, and within a five-foot (5’) radius of driveways and parking areas. c. Including, and within ten-foot (10’) radius of installation of public infrastructure improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and utilities. (5) If a Heritage Tree is removed, it must be replaced with protected trees at least 100% of the dbh or coniferous feet, subject to the following conditions: a. Heritage trees must be replaced with species of a similar type (deciduous or coniferous) that are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in Hennepin County’s recommended tree list (xlsx). b. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are allowed. c. Replacement trees must be at least four and one-half inches (4.5”) in caliper for deciduous trees and a minimum of ten feet (10’) tall for coniferous trees. d. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the City Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 4 Forester before implementation. e. The tree protection plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for the building permit. If the protection plan is not in compliance, the inspection may not be approved. f. Failure to replace Heritage trees results in a payment fee of $500 per deciduous dbh below 100% of the dbh removed, and as applicable, $500 per coniferous foot below 100% of the coniferous feet removed. (6) Before construction, grading or land clearing begins; city-approved tree protection fencing, or other method must be installed and maintained at the critical root zones of the trees to be protected. The location of the fencing must be in conformance with the approved tree protection plan. The fencing must be inspected by city staff before site work begins. The fencing must remain in place until all demolition and construction is complete. (7) No construction, compaction, construction access, stock piling of earth, storage of equipment or building materials, or grading may occur within the critical root zone areas of trees to be protected, unless there are no other on-site alternatives. If there are no other alternatives, a plan for this activity would need to be reviewed and approved by the city forester and included in the tree protection plan. A reasonable effort must be made when trenching utility lines to avoid the critical root zone. (8) When construction is complete all trees to remain must have the soil out to their drip line aerated and de-compacted. Aerating must include multiple concentric circles of 1” holes, 2” deep, or as recommended by an arborist. (9) If Protected Trees and/or Heritage Trees were removed within one (1) year prior to the date the development, subdivision application, demolition, grading and building permit applications were submitted, these Protected Trees and/or Heritage Trees are also subject to the replacement policy set forth in paragraphs (4) and (5) above. (10) Any tree transplanted on-site shall not be counted as a protected tree or heritage tree under this section and therefore does not require requires replacement under this section, provided it is viable at 36 months after the permit’s final inspection per Part 12. (11) Amount of required replacement trees in (4) and (5) above shall be a variety of types and sizes as demonstrated below. Species shall comply with Hennepin County’s “Recommended Tree List.” Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 5 Deciduous (dbh) Coniferous (in feet) Lot size < 1 acre Lot size >/= 1 acre 3½” or greater 8’ or greater 70% 50% 4½” or greater 10’ or greater 20% 25% (12) Financial Guarantee. a. The City shall, at its option, require cash escrow or a letter of credit satisfactory to the City in the amount of 110 percent of the value of the tree replacement identified in the tree protection plan, securing the full performance of Tree Protection Plan. The amount of such security shall be calculated by the fees described in Parts 4f and 5f. b. Release of Financial Guarantee. The financial security shall be released based on the following schedule: i. Upon issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and approval by City Forester that the Tree Protection Plan has been met: Forester will inspect the site and calculate actual fee owed based on how much dbh preserved or replaced on site. The original escrow or line of credit, minus this fee, is 50% released at this time. ii. 36 months after issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, an applicant must submit a landscape review by a certified arborist, indicating planted and preserved trees are still healthy. If any trees are found to be unhealthy, the certified arborist can replace these trees onsite and the balance of the financial guarantee (50% of financial guarantee net of fees in Part a) are released at this time. If the applicant does not opt to replace trees onsite, these fees are considered owed to the City and retained permanently. Section 2. Chapter 24, Article I. Section 24-1 Definitions, in the Edina City Code is amended to add the following: The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Alley means a public right-of-way owned by the city or over which the city owns an easement which is less than 30 feet in width and which is used or is usable as a public thoroughfare. Boulevard means that portion of a street not occupied by the traveled portion of the street or a 5½” or greater 12’ or greater 10% 25% Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 6 sidewalk. Easement means an easement owned by the city for any public purpose. Park means property owned by the city which is used or is usable for park, recreation or open space purposes. Public grounds means any land owned by the city, or over which the city owns an easement, including streets and alleys. Right-of-Way means the surface and space above and below a public roadway, highway, street, cartway, bicycle lane and public sidewalk in which the city has an interest, including other dedicated rights-of-way for travel purposes and utility easements owned by the city for city utility purposes. Sidewalk means an improved thoroughfare located on a public right-of-way or public easement limited to usage by pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles. Street means a public right-of-way owned by the city or over which the city owns an easement which is 30 feet or more in width and which is used or is usable as a public thoroughfare. Section 3. Chapter 24, Article I. Section 24-2 through 3 is added as follows: Sec. 24-2 – BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING The City of Edina encourages the planting of trees in boulevards adjacent to homeowners’ properties. Residents are responsible for planting trees on the boulevard area adjacent to their property and should consult the “Recommended Tree List” held by Hennepin County to avoid planting tree species which detract from the environment. The City of Edina may initiate tree-planting on the boulevard. Sec. 24-3 – BOULEVARD TREE MAINTENANCE The City of Edina believes that it is in the best interest of the residents of Edina and the general public to regulate the planting, maintenance, and removal of trees on City boulevards, rights-of-way, and easements. The City encourages the proper planting and care of trees within the City, in order to increase our overall canopy for the purposes of aesthetics, traffic calming, and climate change response. It is the responsibility of the adjacent property owner to maintain trees on their boulevard. Sightlines along roadways must be maintained at all times; Planted trees should comply with the regulations of City Code, Article VII – Clear Zone View. Pruning should be done between the months of November and March for best care of trees. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 222642v1 7 Section 4. This ordinance is effective January 1, 2023. First Reading: September 7, 2022 Second Reading: October 6, 2022 Published: ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send one affidavit of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk September 7, 2022 Mayor and City Council Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager, Luther Overholt, City Forester Ordinance No. 2022-10: Amending Chapters 10 and 24 Concerning Residential Tree Protection Executive Summary In the case of Ordinance 2022-10, the role of the Sustainability Manager has been to support Energy & Environment Commission’s (EEC) efforts to complete their 2022 Work Plan Initiative to “Support new ordinance development or the modification of current ones to protect tree canopy." This includes receiving an ordinance proposal from the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regarding boulevard tree management, and coordinating both staff and EEC review and approval for advancement to City Council. Further, the Manager’s role includes gathering subject matter expertise from practitioners in other cities and research agencies, along with staff comments on this proposed ordinance amendment from the Parks & Recreation Department - the staff department responsible for implementation of such an ordinance. Comments were also received from the City Attorney, Planning Department, Building Inspections Division, and Engineering Department, given their interaction and expertise regarding residential development and boulevard management in Edina. This ordinance amendment proposal includes a memo of support from staff, the residential Tree Protection Ordinance recommended by the EEC as well as the Boulevard Tree Management ordinance recommendation from ETC, EEC’s report on this subject, and advisory communications of support from both the Planning and Transportation Commissions. Staff Recommendation Staff offers their full support and recommendation for adoption of the ordinance amendment proposal for Chapter 10 “TREE PROTECTION.” Staff offers partial support and recommendation for adoption of the ordinance amendment proposal for Chapter 24 “STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES.” Specifically, staff does not support ETC’s recommendation to add a permit requirement for tree removal in the boulevard right-of-way. Staff asks Council to approve these ordinance amendments, without Sec 24-4, “Tree Removal.” STAFF REPORT Page 2 Key Staff Comments The City of Edina Parks Department, Planning, Engineering, and Buildings Inspections has reviewed together, and mutually agreed upon, support for the Residential Tree Protection ordinance amendments apart from Sec 24-4 “Tree Removal.” The Department supports the passing of this ordinance because it aligns with the City’s tree canopy management goals outlined in the Climate Action Plan. Further, these ordinance amendments move the City toward greater neighborhood tree preservation, maintaining and enhancing neighborhood character. Sec 24-4 “Tree Removal” Creating a permitting process for removal is inconsistent with the way the City typically permits residential use of the right-of-way (ROW). Currently, residents are allowed to add and remove elements in the ROW (trees, landscaping, irrigation, pet fences, decorative mailboxes, etc.) without permission or restriction from the City unless there is an obstruction of traffic control devices or intersection sight distance. Requiring a permit for tree removal should be part of a broader review of the City’s approach to ROW management. Such a review requires direction on how the City views boulevard/ROW trees. If they are seen as providing a public good (similar to sidewalks), then it could make sense to require private replacement/maintenance in the same way the City does for sidewalks. If they are strictly seen as private (similar to landscaping, irrigation systems, pet fences), it likely does not make sense to require a permit. Further, permit requirements for tree removal in the ROW will have accessory impacts which should be studied further before a decision is made. For instance, permit requirements may involve lane or road closures in non-reconstruction project areas, causing hardship for residents navigating neighborhood streets. Finally, when caring for trees and making landscaping decisions, few residents make the distinction between their front lawn and the boulevard/ROW. The City does not require a permit to remove a tree in someone’s front lawn, and requiring one for the boulevard would need robust communication, education and enforcement. Staff believe these resources should be focused on broader residential redevelopment engagement to achieve the highest return on investment and accelerate progress on Edina’s tree canopy management goals. Staff recommends that Council adopt the ordinance amendment proposal without Sec 24-4. Additional Staffing needs & Ordinance Administration  Fee collection – The EEC surveyed existing requirements in St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Washington, DC and Bellevue WA (this is a sibling city to Edina and one staff knowledge shares with regularly). Among these communities, EEC recommended tree removal fee levels around the median. City staff ground-truthed these fee levels by estimating City costs for tree stewardship: not only planting, but maintenance as well. Staff STAFF REPORT Page 3 also cross-walked this fee number with expected staff hours to enforce this ordinance proposal. Staff expects this fee level will discourage removal, and fund sufficient ordinance enforcement including tree stewardship needs that arise from it. o Fees received for tree loss not replaced on site will be used to support ordinance administration, including the following activities:  Replacement of tree canopy loss due to development 1. Expenses related to tree stewardship (planting, watering, maintenance, removal if needed)  Enforcement of ordinance: 1. Staff time spent on tree protection plan reviews, site inspections, measurement, follow-ups  Financial guarantee administration: 1. Staff time spent tracking financial guarantee receipt, partial release at time of Certificate of Occupancy issuance, final release at 36 month arborist review  Ordinance enforcement – The Forestry Division is hiring a second staff member in the 2022-2023 budget year. This staff member was approved to enforce the current ordinance, prior to EEC recommended changes. These recommendations, which staff supports, will require additional staff time to effectively enforce. Supporting Material Appendix A: Ordinance 2022-10 amending Chapters 10 and 24 of Edina City Code Appendix B: EEC 2022 Residential Tree Protection Report Appendix C: ETC Advisory Communication of Support Appendix D: Planning Commission Advisory Communication of Support Date: September 7, 2022 To: Mayor and City Council From: Energy and Environment Commission John Haugen, EEC Commissioner Subject: Recommendation to amend Chapters 10 and 24 with Ordinance 2022-10, Residential Tree Protection Action Requested: Approve amendment recommendation to Chapters 10 and 24 with Ordinance 2022-10, Residential Tree Protection Situation: In August 2022, EEC voted to approve language to amend Edina’s Tree Protection Ordinance. We ask that you consider these amendments and vote to approve the changes. There is a single goal of these revisions: to maintain canopy of healthy, mature trees. At a high level, the revisions will accomplish this by: • Deploying best practices in place at other cities – e.g., St. Lous Park, Wayzata, and Minnetonka – that are currently lacking in our ordinance • Ensuring additional trees not covered by the current ordinance will require protection or replacement: o More trees will be in the “Protected Status” group o New group called “Heritage Status” group which carry additional replacement beyond what’s required of Protected Trees o Removal of exemptions to the ordinance while still allowing for flexibility when replanting is not an option • Providing in-lieu fee revenue to assist in enforcement of revised ordinance Outcomes of Proposed Revisions: • Fewer clearcut lots during redevelopment, and/or replanting required for a significant portion of what is removed • Tree protection requirements linked to size of trees • Edina will be standing among peer cities as having adopted tree protection best practices already implemented in the metro area • Additional fee revenue will directly fund enforcement of ordinance, tree management in Edina • Developers will be accountable for either protecting trees or replacing them if removal is the only option Page 2 Background: Collaborative Effort A working group of 3 Commissioners from EEC developed these revisions after extensive consultation with a variety of groups. Staff recommend in favor of most revisions, and two other commissions participated in this effort, reflected in favorable Advisory Communications accompanying this recommendation. Consulted Group Result of Collaboration City staff, including City Manager, Forester, Sustainability Manager, Community Development Director, Parks Director, Building Official, City Engineer, Transportation Planner, City Attorney / outside counsel • Support for all recommended changes related to Chapter 10 proposed amendments • Support for most recommended changes related to Chapter 24 proposed amendments. Members of the Planning Commission • Advisory Communication in support Members of the Transportation Commission • Advisory Communication in support • Verbiage related to boulevard trees Current State of Tree Protection in Edina The current Tree Protection Ordinance was passed in 2014 and very minor revisions passed in 2019. Unfortunately, the current Ordinance and how it’s implemented results in a significant lack of protection of our tree canopy for three reasons: • Developers do what they want: o There is a tepid disincentive – an in-lieu donation of $350 per tree cut down and not replaced – that does not give developers a reason to keep trees, and in fact rewards them through a Council recognition of their donation. o On most lots, construction is easier to perform with no trees in the ground due to the requirements for erosion control, fencing, and since most developers are maximizing the build footprint of each lot • Lack of enforcement of current ordinance provisions: o Enforcement was not well-staffed when the ordinance passed initially (though recent new hires will improve this) o The in-lieu fee is not commensurate with the harm caused to the neighborhood – $350 does not come close to the value of a mature hardwood tree o Up until very recently, the Parks & Rec and Planning teams required for enforcement were understaffed, specifically in the forestry area • Ordinance lacks numerous provisions vs. SLP, Wayzata, Minnetonka: o Our fee = $350, their fees are per inch not replaced o Our replacement requirement = 2.5” trees, regardless of size of tree removed; their replacement requirements are based on the size of the tree removed Page 3 The results cut against many of the goals Edina has in place, particularly related to our Climate Action Plan. Influences & Similar Ordinances City Protected Heritage Wayzata Healthy Hardwood Deciduous Tree 6" > dbh Healthy Softwood Deciduous Tree 12" > dbh Healthy Coniferous Tree – 12" to 25” dbh Replacement: ● Teardowns: must replace 75% of the total lot tree coverage ● Expansion/additions: must replace 90% of total lot tree coverage Noncompliance Fee: $160 per inch, no cap Healthy Hardwood Deciduous Tree 25" > dbh Healthy Softwood Deciduous Tree 30" > dbh Healthy Coniferous Tree > 25" dbh Replacement: ● Must replace all Heritage trees removed at a 2:1 ratio. For example, remove a 30" DBH Tree, must replace it with 60" of DBH Trees. Noncompliance Fee: $160 per inch, no cap St. Louis Park 1 2 Deciduous – 5” dbh Coniferous – 6” dbh Replacement: ● Complicated formula, roughly nets out to 75- 85% dbh replacement required Noncompliance Fee: $145 per inch, no cap Under consideration as of 2022 Minnetonka “Significant” Deciduous – 4” dbh Coniferous – 10’ height 50% can be removed for redevelopment “High Priority” Deciduous – 10” dbh Coniferous – 15” height 25-35% can be removed for redevelopment Effects of canopy loss in Edina Environmental Biodiversity loss Climate change Urban heat gain Human Higher cooling costs Lower air quality Aesthetic loss Page 4 Removal beyond the percent above must be replaced 2:1 dbh/height, or subject to a $500 per dbh fee with a cap of $2,000 Removal beyond the percent above must be replaced 2:1 dbh, or subject to a $500 per dbh fee with a cap of $2,000 District of Columbia 14” - 32” dbh Any tree above 32” dbh requires city forester approval to remove. Assessment: Proposed Revision 1: Modify definition of “Protected Status” Trees; add “Heritage Status” This first revision creates a Heritage status which identifies especially mature trees for a higher degree of protection. Additionally, it includes mid-size trees Deciduous: Protects additional trees between 5” and 8” dbh, New Classification above 30” dbh for mature trees Coniferous: Protects additional trees between 15’ and 20’ height, New Classification above 30’ height for mature trees. Staff supports this revision. Proposed Revision 2: Removal of Exemptions The second proposed change removes the exemption for trees in the building or driveway footprint. Currently, a tree “in the way” of any of the planned structures or surfaces can be removed without replacement. In the proposed revisions, these trees may be removed just like any other, but they are subject to the replacement requirements just like any other. We keep the exemptions for low-value species as-written in the current ordinance. Staff supports this revision. Page 5 Proposed Revision 3: Changes in Compliance and In-lieu Fee The final significant revision changes the replacement requirement from a 1-to-1 “tree for tree” replacement to a replacement threshold based on the size of the tree(s) removed and not replaced on-site. Currently, a removed tree must be replaced by a tree at least 2.5” in diameter. As proposed, 75% of the diameter must be replaced on-site for all protected trees removed, and 100% for all heritage. The in-lieu fee changes from a per-tree basis to a per-inch basis below the percentages listed below. Staff supports this revision. Compliance Example As illustrated below, the proposed revisions significantly improve the business case for developers to keep the current canopy and allows a workaround in-lieu fee in cases where that is not feasible. Recommendation: The EEC recommends that Council approve the City Code amendments in Ordinance 2022-10, Residential Tree Protection. Date: August 18, 2022 To: Mayor and City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: Support for EEC Tree Protection Ordinance Amendment Action Requested: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) recommends Council approve the Energy & Environment Commission’s (EEC’s) proposed amendments to the Tree Protection Ordinance. Situation: Edina does not currently have a strong ordinance to protect, maintain, and grow its tree canopy, including its boulevard trees. Recommendation: The ETC recommends approval the EEC’s Amended Tree Protection Ordinance as proposed. These amendments specifically include tree protection for boulevard trees, a primary concern of the ETC. It is well documented that boulevard trees significantly benefit the community through traffic calming, as well as by creating positive aesthetic and environmental impacts. Our recently approved Climate Action Plan calls for an increase in Edina’s canopy. In order to do this, all aspects of tree planting, growth, maintenance, and protection will need to be strongly implemented. ETC has reviewed the proposed revisions to the Tree Protection Ordinance and has provided revisions to the ordinance clarifying the role of boulevard trees per our work plan. Date: September 7, 2022 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Edina Planning Commission Subject: Tree Ordinance proposed by the EEC Action Requested: The Council approve the tree ordinance amendment recommended by the EEC Background: The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed revisions to the Tree Protection Ordinance. Assessment: The Planning Commission supports the proposed changes. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the amendment to this ordinance as proposed by EEC. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Reject Bids for Contract FC21-04 Edina City Hall Energy Use and Lighting Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Reject Bids for Contract FC21-04 Edina City Hall Energy Use and Lighting Improvements. INTRODUCTION: Bids received were incomplete and did not accurately reflect the project scope and intent. Upon further review staff feel that the bid documents and specifications caused confusion and need to be modified before the project can be re-opened for bidding. ATTACHMENTS: Description FC21-04 City Hall EMS Bid Tab Edina City Hall Energy Use and Lighting Improvements (#8283317) Owner: Edina MN, City of Solicitor: Edina MN, City of 09/15/2022 11:00 AM CDT Engineer Estimate HumeraTech Laketown Electric Vinco, Inc Section TitleLine Item Item Code Item DescriptionUofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Schedule A $0.00 $956,322.00 $1,470,000.00 $1,300,000.00 1 1 GENERAL CONDITIONSLS 1 $7,474.00 $7,474.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 2 2 MOBILIZATIONLS 1 $2,228.00 $2,228.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 3 3 DEMOLITION & EARTHWORKLS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 4 SITEWORK LS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5 5 MASONRY LS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6 6 METALS LS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 7 7 CARPENTRYLS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 8 8 ROOFING LS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 9 9 EXTERIOR ENVELOPELS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 10 OPENINGS LS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 11 11 FINISHES LS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 12 12 SPECIALTIESLS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 13 13 PLUMBINGLS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 14 14 HVAC LS 1 $315,597.00 $315,597.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 15 15 ELECTRICALLS 1 $631,023.00 $631,023.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 16 16 COMMUNICIATIONSLS 1 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Schedule B $0.00 $1,182.80 $675.00 $600.00 18 18 Premium time-HVAC TechHr 1 $233.20 $233.20 $120.00 $120.00 $150.00 $150.00 19 19 Premium time-ElectricianHr 1 $233.20 $233.20 $120.00 $120.00 $150.00 $150.00 20 20 Premium time-PipefitterHr 1 $233.20 $233.20 $145.00 $145.00 $150.00 $150.00 21 21 Premium time--BAS ControlsHr 1 $233.20 $233.20 $190.00 $190.00 $150.00 $150.00 22 22 BAS Data Point$/Point 1 $250.00 $250.00 $100.00 $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 Electrical Light Fixtures $0.00 $0.00 $55,862.29 $507,207.00 23 23 AP1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,549.55 $2,549.55 $5,912.00 $5,912.00 24 24 AP2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $3,375.25 $3,375.25 $5,912.00 $5,912.00 25 25 AP2E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $3,634.00 $3,634.00 $2,365.00 $2,365.00 26 26 DR1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $135.70 $135.70 $75,592.00 $75,592.00 27 27 DR1E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $349.60 $349.60 $32,481.00 $32,481.00 28 28 DR2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $164.45 $164.45 $2,362.00 $2,362.00 29 29 DR3 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $299.00 $299.00 $11,220.00 $11,220.00 30 30 DR4 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $285.20 $285.20 $2,365.00 $2,365.00 31 31 EU1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $251.85 $251.85 $18,307.00 $18,307.00 32 32 EU2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $240.35 $240.35 $3,543.00 $3,543.00 33 33 EU3 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $305.90 $305.90 $590.00 $590.00 34 34 EW1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $211.60 $211.60 $6,496.00 $6,496.00 35 35 EW2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $128.80 $128.80 $2,365.00 $2,365.00 36 36 EW3 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $134.55 $134.55 $590.00 $590.00 37 37 JP1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $465.75 $465.75 $13,583.00 $13,583.00 38 38 JP1E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $803.85 $803.85 $5,912.00 $5,912.00 39 39 LC1 LF 1 $0.00 $0.00 $95.00 $95.00 $590.00 $590.00 40 40 LP1-16 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,658.30 $1,658.30 $590.00 $590.00 41 41 LP1-20 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,073.45 $2,073.45 $2,365.00 $2,365.00 42 42 LP1-30 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,901.45 $2,901.45 $590.00 $590.00 43 43 LR1-4 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $301.24 $301.24 $590.00 $590.00 44 44 LR1-6 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $451.95 $451.95 $2,365.00 $2,365.00 45 45 LR1-8 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $547.40 $547.40 $7,086.00 $7,086.00 46 46 LR1-8E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $798.10 $798.10 $590.00 $590.00 47 47 LR1-10 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $661.25 $661.25 $1,771.00 $1,771.00 48 48 LR1-12 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $779.70 $779.70 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 49 49 LR1-14 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $909.65 $909.65 $3,543.00 $3,543.00 50 50 LR1-16 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,039.60 $1,039.60 $2,953.00 $2,953.00 51 51 LR1-18 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,168.40 $1,168.40 $2,953.00 $2,953.00 52 52 LR1-20 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,298.35 $1,298.35 $3,543.00 $3,543.00 53 53 LR1-22 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,428.30 $1,428.30 $2,953.00 $2,953.00 54 54 LR1-24 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,558.25 $1,558.25 $590.00 $590.00 55 55 LR1-28 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,818.15 $1,818.15 $590.00 $590.00 56 56 LR1-28E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,114.85 $2,114.85 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 57 57 LR1-30 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $1,946.95 $1,946.95 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 58 58 LR1-30E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,248.25 $2,248.25 $590.00 $590.00 59 59 LR1-36 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,335.65 $2,335.65 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 60 60 LR1-36E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $2,651.90 $2,651.90 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 61 61 LR1-52 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $3,375.25 $3,375.25 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 62 62 LS1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $93.15 $93.15 $7,087.00 $7,087.00 63 63 LS2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $157.55 $157.55 $46,655.00 $46,655.00 64 64 RG1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $171.35 $171.35 $15,945.00 $15,945.00 65 65 RG1E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $327.75 $327.75 $10,630.00 $10,630.00 66 66 RG2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $235.75 $235.75 $108,073.00 $108,073.00 67 67 RG2E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $392.15 $392.15 $590.00 $590.00 68 68 RG2L EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $235.75 $235.75 $2,360.00 $2,360.00 69 69 RG3E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $396.75 $396.75 $590.00 $590.00 70 70 RH1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $200.10 $200.10 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 71 71 RH1E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $356.50 $356.50 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 72 72 RH2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $267.95 $267.95 $8,267.00 $8,267.00 73 73 RH2E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $424.35 $424.35 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 74 74 TT1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $360.35 $360.35 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 75 75 VR1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $696.90 $696.90 $12,401.00 $12,401.00 76 76 VR1E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $931.50 $931.50 $2,360.00 $2,360.00 77 77 VW1 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $596.85 $596.85 $560.00 $560.00 78 78 WH1E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $292.10 $292.10 $14,764.00 $14,764.00 79 79 WH2 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $768.20 $768.20 $29,528.00 $29,528.00 80 80 WH3 EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $579.60 $579.60 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 81 81 WH3E EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 $880.90 $880.90 $1,180.00 $1,180.00 Base Bid Total:$0.00 $957,504.80 $1,526,537.29 $1,807,807.00 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Rachel Finberg, Project Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Soils Study for Community Health and Safety Center, 4401 W. 76th St. Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for a Soils Study at the Community Health and Safety Center, 4401 W. 76th St., with Braun Intertec for $25,200. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the environmental investigation is to evaluate general environmental conditions at the site such as soil and groundwater, which may be disturbed during future site redevelopment, and on-site soil vapors to evaluate if vapor mitigation may be necessary for the new site structures. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Soils Study Community Health and Safety Center, 4401 W, 76th St. Braun Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200215 Department:Engineering Buyer:Rachel Finberg Date: 09/23/2022 Requisition Description:Soils Study Comm. Health & Safety Center 4401 76th Vendor:BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Cost:$25,200.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Braun will conduct a soils and groundwater investigation to provide design information for the development team for the new Community Health and Safety Center l. The purpose of the environmental investigation at the 4401 W 76th Street is to evaluate general environmental conditions at the site, including soil, soil and groundwater, which may be disturbed during future site redevelopment, and on-site soil vapors to evaluate if vapor mitigation may be necessary for the new site structures. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded from bonding dedicated to the Community Health and Safety Center. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: NA Service Contract ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com July 27, 2022 Proposal QTB162348 Chad Millner, PE City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Proposal for Environmental Services Preliminary Site Redevelopment 4401 West 76th Street Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Millner: Braun Intertec Corporation is pleased to present this proposal to perform environmental services for the referenced property in Edina, Minnesota (i.e. Site). Project Information We understand that the City of Edina is considering purchase and acquisition of the above referenced Site. Redevelopment plans include demolition of the existing building, construction of new streets and trails, and construction of a fire station building on a portion of the Site. The existing building is one-story and approximately 101,000 square feet in size. The specific redevelopment configuration has not been decided, although several conceptual designs have been contemplated. Background Information In preparation of this proposal, we have reviewed several documents provided to us, including: Geotechnical Exploration report prepared by American Engineering and Testing and dated November 21, 2021; Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by SECOR International Incorporated and dated July 14, 2005; Asbestos Sampling and Analysis report prepared by Legend Technical Services, Inc. and dated August 18, 2005; and a Property Condition Report prepared by TRG Assessment Services, Inc. and dated September 7, 2005. The Geotechnical Exploration identified groundwater at a depth of approximately five (5) to 12 feet below ground surface (bgs). The Asbestos Sampling and Analysis report identified several asbestos containing materials in the Site building. City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 2 Scope of Services The following tasks are proposed to help us meet your project goals. If unfavorable or unforeseen conditions are encountered at any point during the completion of tasks that lead us to recommend an expanded scope of services, we will contact you to discuss those conditions before resuming work. Please indicate which of these services you would like to pursue at this time. Task 1 – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Braun Intertec will conduct a Phase I ESA of the Site in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E 1527- 13, which is the recognized industry standard defining good commercial and customary practice for conducting all appropriate inquiry (AAI) into the previous ownership and uses of the Site consistent with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The intent of this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability. The purpose of the Phase I ESA will be to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. A revised ESA Standard, ASTM E1527-21, was issued in November 2021. The updated standard has not been reviewed and accepted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as satisfying the requirements for AAI, and therefore ASTM E1527-13 continues to be the Standard recognized as meeting AAI. While Braun Intertec will continue to reference E1527-13 in the scope of services until EPA issues its formal approval, note that Braun Intertec procedures and reporting formats will be in conformance with ASTM E1527-21, as it represents best industry practices. The Phase I ESA will include a government and historical records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, and data evaluation. The results of the Phase I ESA will be summarized in a written report. So that they may be identified within the report, the user must supply the names of all parties intending to rely on the executed service and subsequent report. Additional reliance may be obtained at the discretion of Braun Intertec. In order to satisfy the requirements of AAI, the user bears specific responsibilities for satisfying certain components of the environmental inquiry. The E 1527 Practice provides a User Questionnaire which outlines the information that the user must provide (if available) to the Environmental Professional. The User Questionnaire, attached to this proposal, should be completed and returned to Braun Intertec so that the information can be included in the report. The results of the Phase I ESA will be summarized in a written report documenting information sources used, findings and conclusions, and the professional opinion of Braun Intertec regarding the impact of any potential environmental concerns in connection with the Site. Appendices to the report will include copies of available historical information (e.g., fire insurance maps, aerial photographs, etc.). A draft copy of the Phase I ESA will be issued electronically for review and comment. Upon receipt of comments, Braun Intertec will issue the final Phase I ESA report. Only an electronic copy of the Phase I ESA report will be submitted to you unless you request otherwise. City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 3 Task 2 – Pre-Demolition Hazardous Building Materials Inspection (2-Trip) The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) requires building owners to identify all regulated or hazardous materials prior to building renovation or demolition. Therefore, we are proposing to conduct a pre-demolition asbestos/hazardous material inspection of the existing building at the Site. The goal of the inspection will be to identify asbestos- containing materials and other potentially hazardous materials that require separate handling and/or disposal prior to building demolition. The MPCA and MDH require destructive investigations to be performed prior to demolition, in order to identify hazardous building material in currently inaccessible areas. This includes such areas as inside walls, soffits and chases; above ceilings; under floors; etc. This inspection will be performed in two phases. The initial inspection will be limited to areas available for observation and testing by non-destructive means. After the building is vacated and prior to demolition, we will conduct a destructive investigation in order to identify hazardous building materials in previously inaccessible areas. In addition, we will test building components such as roofing materials, fire doors and boiler interiors that will not be sampled initially, in order to maintain the integrity of these items. Our representatives will perform the following services:  Visually examine accessible areas and identify the locations of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-based paint (LBP), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, and other miscellaneous hazardous material.  Collect and analyze representative bulk samples of materials suspected of containing asbestos. Examples of materials to be collected for analysis include, but are not limited to: floor tile, linoleum flooring, wall and ceiling plaster, suspended and acoustical ceiling tile, sheetrock, thermal system insulation, textured ceiling material and fireproofing. For purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that up to 75 samples will be collected during the initial non-destructive inspection for asbestos analysis and up to 10 samples will be reanalyzed by the Point Count Method. For the follow-up destructive inspection, up to 25 samples will be collected for asbestos analysis.  Conduct limited LBP testing of various building components that may be recyclable. The various painted surfaces suspected of containing lead will be tested using a Niton X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrum analyzer. The Niton is a portable, non-destructive, in-situ test and measurement instrument. The scope of the limited LBP is intended to be used to aid the Contractor in developing the project budget, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker safety requirements and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Renovation, Repair and Painting Program Rule (RRP) compliance. OSHA does not consider any method that relies solely on the analysis of bulk materials or surface content of lead (or other toxic material) to be acceptable for safely predicting employee exposure to airborne contaminants. Additional lead air monitoring may be required to determine potential employee airborne exposure. City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 4 Note: The limited LBP testing is not intended to represent a comprehensive LBP inspection, lead risk assessment or fulfill the testing protocols required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Lead Safe Housing Rule, 24 CFR 35, subparts B through R, et al., June 21, 2004. Additional LBP testing may be required.  Assign a hazard rating based on asbestos content with respect to the materials condition, friability, accessibility, and hazard potential.  Document the various materials current conditions and estimated quantities of ACM based on visual observations.  Generate a final report, documenting the sample locations, analysis results, conditions, and ACM estimated quantities. The Braun Intertec personnel conducting the inspection are fully accredited asbestos inspectors, in accordance with state and federal regulations. Asbestos analysis will be performed by a laboratory that is accredited for polarized light microscopy (PLM) asbestos bulk sample analysis by the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program. Task 3 – Environmental Investigation The purpose of the environmental investigation at the Site is to evaluate general environmental conditions at the Site, including soil, soil and groundwater, which may be disturbed during future Site redevelopment, and on-Site soil vapors to evaluate if vapor mitigation may be necessary for the new Site structures. Soil Borings We will subcontract a licensed driller to install five (5) soil borings on the site. Two of the borings will be advanced to a depth of 12 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the purpose of soil sampling. Three of the borings will be advanced to a depth of approximately 15 feet bgs for the purpose of soil and groundwater sampling. Utility Clearance Prior to drilling or excavating, our drilling subcontractor will contact Gopher State One Call and arrange for notification of the appropriate utility vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities. You, or your authorized representatives, are responsible to notify us before we begin our work of the presence and location of any underground objects or private utilities that are not the responsibility of public agencies. In addition, our fees include a budget to retain a private locate company to mark private utilities that are not the responsibility of public agencies. We will not be liable for any damages resulting from unidentified or misidentified underground objects or utilities. Further, we reserve the right to stop work if underground objects or utilities are suspected or known to exist, but locations cannot be accurately determined. City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 5 Field Screening Soil samples retrieved will be examined by field personnel for unusual staining, odors, and other apparent signs of contamination. In addition, the soil samples will be screened for the presence of organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID). The PID will be equipped with a 10.6-electron-volt lamp and calibrated to an isobutylene standard. The PID will be used to perform direct measurement and a headspace method of field analysis, as recommended by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in Petroleum Remediation Program Guidance Document 4-04 (September 2008). Soil samples will be collected from the soil borings for laboratory analyses. Soil samples will be collected from depth intervals in the unsaturated zone where indications of contamination are observed in the field. If no indications of contamination are observed in the field, soil samples will be collected from depths most likely to be encountered during proposed redevelopment activities based on information provided by the client at the time this proposal was prepared. Analytical Testing The budget for this task assumes that a total of seven soil samples will be submitted to Pace Analytical Laboratories in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and analyzed for a combination of the following parameters:  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270.  Diesel range organics (DRO) using the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Method.  Gasoline range organics (GRO) using the WDNR Method.  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals using EPA Methods 6020 and 7471. Groundwater Sampling and Testing Groundwater is expected to be present at a depth of approximately five to 12 feet bgs. Temporary wells will be installed in three the borings for the purpose of collecting groundwater samples. Prior to sampling, static groundwater level in the wells will be measured and recorded. A groundwater sample will be collected from each well using a length of tubing equipped with a check ball valve. The groundwater samples will be placed directly into laboratory-supplied containers, preserved appropriately, and submitted to the laboratory for chemical analyses. The budget for this task assumes that three groundwater samples will be collected from the temporary well and submitted to Pace Analytical Laboratories in Minneapolis, Minnesota and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260. Soil Vapor Probes MPCA vapor guidance requires two seasonal soil vapor sampling events to evaluate soil vapor conditions at a site. Braun Intertec will subcontract a licensed driller to install temporary soil vapor probes on the Site during the MPCA-defined “heating“ season (November 1 – March 31) and “non-heating” season (April 1 – October 31). During each of two seasonal sampling events, 8 soil vapor probes will be advanced on the Site to a depth of approximately 5 feet bgs and then retracted to a depth of 3 feet bgs to expose soil pore space for City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 6 sampling. New, inert tubing will be attached to the top of the downhole sampler and the sampling point and tubing will be purged with a hand pump to remove two volumes of air prior to sample collection. Following purging, organic vapor concentrations will be screened with a PID and the value recorded. The soil vapor samples will then be collected using laboratory-supplied negative pressure air-sample collection canisters (1- or 6-liter canisters) equipped with 200 milliliter per minute (mL/min) flow restrictors in accordance with the MPCA guidelines. Following sample collection, the temporary sampling point will be removed from the borehole and the borehole will be sealed in accordance with MDH guidelines. The soil vapor samples will be submitted to Pace Analytical Laboratories in Minneapolis, Minnesota and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method TO-15 (30 total samples). Environmental Reporting Verbal results of the environmental investigation will be provided to you as they become available. Upon completion of the on-Site work and receipt of laboratory analytical results, a report will be prepared detailing the methods, results, and conclusions/recommendations. A draft copy of the report will be forwarded to you prior to report finalization. Following completion of the second seasonal soil vapor sampling event, a supplementary letter report will be prepared documenting the results of the sampling. Only an electronic copy of the report will be submitted to you unless you request otherwise. Cost Estimate We will furnish the services described in this proposal on a time and materials basis (with the exception of the Phase I ESA, which is a lump sum) for the estimated costs shown in Table 1 below. Please indicate which of these you would like to complete by checking the boxes to the left. Table 1. Proposed Fee Summary Services to Complete Task Fee ☐ Task 1 – Phase 1 ESA $2,500 ☐ Task 2 – Pre-Demolition Hazardous Building Materials Inspection (2-Trip) 7,500 ☐ Task 3 – Environmental Investigation 25,200 Total of All Tasks $35,200 Braun Intertec will begin the project upon receipt of your authorization. The estimated cost is based on the Scope of Services described herein and the assumption that the proposal will be authorized within 30 days and that the project will be completed within the proposed schedule. This cost estimate was developed with the understanding that the scope of services defined herein will be performed during our normal business hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 7 Services that we are asked to provide outside our normal business hours will be invoiced at 1.25 times the listed hourly rate. Services provided on Sunday or legal holidays will be invoiced at 1.5 times the listed hourly rate. You will be billed only for services provided on a time and material basis. Schedule Phase I ESA We anticipate the draft Phase I ESA report will be completed within three weeks from the date of your written authorization. The Phase I ESA report will remain in draft status until we are notified by you to proceed with issuance of the final Phase I ESA report. Hazardous Building Materials Survey We anticipate the non-destructive portion of the hazardous building materials survey can be completed within two to three weeks from the date of your written authorization. The follow-up destructive portion of the survey will be coordinated with you as needed. Environmental Investigation The non-heating season soil vapor probes and five soil borings will be completed within approximately three weeks of written authorization and will be completed in one day. The heating season soil vapor probes will be completed in November 2022 and will be completed in one day. Typical turnaround time on laboratory analysis is approximately eight business days for all samples. A draft report will be forwarded to you within 2 weeks after receipt of laboratory analytical results. Assessment Limitations Please note the Scope of Services for the proposed investigation, in conjunction with the existing data, is designed to evaluate the potential presence of soil, groundwater, and/or soil vapor contamination and debris. However, because there is a fixed number of sampling locations proposed, the Scope of Services proposed herein may not fully define the extent of contamination that may be present at the Site. Further, please note that identification of contamination may require the property owner to notify the MPCA of an identified release, and additional investigation may be required to evaluate the extent of impacts and to obtain applicable liability assurance letters from the MPCA Acceptance of Proposal/General Remarks Braun Intertec appreciates the opportunity to present this proposal to you. This proposal is being sent in an electronic version only. Braun Intertec would be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed Scope of Services further and clarify the various scope components. After reviewing this proposal, please sign and return one copy to Braun Intertec as notification of acceptance and authorization to proceed. If anything in this proposal is not consistent with your requirements, please let us know immediately. City of Edina Proposal QTB162348 July 27, 2022 Page 8 The Braun Intertec General Conditions are included with this proposal and are a part of our agreement. We appreciate the opportunity to provide professional services for you on this project. If you have questions regarding the contents of this proposal, please feel free to contact Imants Pone at 952.995.2665 or ipone@braunintertec.com. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Imants Pone Senior Scientist Mark A. Ciampone, PG Business Unit Leader, Senior Scientist Attachments: Proposed Exploration Locations Client Information Request Form ASTM Practice E 1527-13 User Questionnaire General Conditions (1/1/2018) The proposal is accepted, and you are authorized to proceed. Authorizer’s Firm Authorizer’s Signature Authorizer’s Name (please print or type) Authorizer’s Title Date Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1 Normandale Park C Watermain Rehabilitation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Change Order No. 1 Normandale Park C Watermain Rehabilitation for $178,249 with Fer-Pal Construction USA LLC. INTRODUCTION: During construction, the contractor found rusting bolts, fittings and other watermain fixtures near the perimeter of the project that required replacement. These replacements then also required more street pavements repairs. Change Order No. 1 increases the contract by $178,249.88 from $569,425.00 to $747,674.88. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order #1 Normandale Park C Watermain Rehab Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200131 Department: Engineering Buyer: Chad Millner Date: 10/6/2022 Requisition Description: Change Order #1: Normandale Park C Watermain Rehab Vendor: FER-PAL CONSTRUCTION USA LLC Cost: $178,249.88 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: During construction the contractor found rusting bolts, fittings and other watermain fixtures near the perimeter of the project that required replacement. These replacements then also required more street pavements repairs. Change Order #1 increases the contract by $158,049.88 from $569,425.00 to $747,674.88 The Normandale Park C Neighborhood has been experiencing many watermain breaks This project will rehabilitate the existing watermain by inserting a watermain liner into the existing pipe to create a new pipe by trenchless method. This work will occur before a scheduled mill and overlay of the pavement in 2023. The rehabilitation will be completed by trenchless cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) method to reduce construction limits. CIPP builds a structural pipe within a pipe with minimal loss of pipe size. It has an expected service life of 75-years. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded from water utility fund. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: A reliable water distribution system is vital to fire suppression systems and clean drinking water. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Rehabilitation by trenchless methods reduces the amount of GHG emissions compared to open cut methods. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Relocate Overhead Power Lines for Morningside Flood Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase to relocate overhead power lines for the Morningside Flood Project with Northern States Power (Xcel Energy) for $141,943. INTRODUCTION: This project will relocate overhead power lines that are currently located between France Avenue and Weber Park. The Weber P ond expansion requires relocation of these overhead power lines along France Avenue, 42nd Street, and within Weber Park for grading operations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Relocate Overhead Power Lines for Morningside Flood Project Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200213 Department:Engineering Buyer:Chad Millner Date: 09/22/2022 Requisition Description:Relocate Overhead Power Lines Morningside Flood Vendor:NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, MINNESOTA Cost:$141,943.83 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This project will relocate overhead power lines that are currently located between France Avenue and Weber Park. The Weber Pond expansion requires relocation of these overhead power lines along France Avenue, 42nd Street, and within Weber Park for grading operations. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded by the storm water utility as part of the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project supports the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract Updated 05/19/2022 Account No. Job No. Job Address Northern States Power Company - Minnesota Dear Thank you for choosing Xcel Energy to be your energy provider. We appreciate your business, and our goal is to deliver you reliable service at an affordable price. This letter contains important information about your requested service. Please read all details below as well as any accompanying information and respond accordingly to ensure your project is completed accurately and timely. This letter relates to your request for: Your portion of the cost of this project is . A hard copy invoice will be sent to you via U.S. Mail Postal Service in the coming days. Please see the attached payment options document for more instructions. Upon receipt of payment and other required documentation as noted below, your project will be scheduled and you will be notified of the scheduled date. If paying by check, please note the account number identified at the top of this letter on your check to ensure accurate and timely payment processing. Below is a list of additional documentation that you will need to review, sign, and return to the Xcel Energy Designer by email or U.S. Postal Service to their address listed at the bottom of the letter. Please retain a copy of all documentation for your records. Documents to be returned to Xcel Energy: Additional enclosures: If you have any questions about the enclosures or about your specific job, please contact the design representative below and reference your account number and/or job number above. We look forward to being your energy provider. Sincerely, Xcel Energy Page 1 of 2 Updated 03/08/2021 Customer Payment Options Xcel Energy offers seven payment options to pay for your construction project. Please select the payment options that work best for you. Payment options listed in order of quickest processing MyAccount/eBill™ Register at xcelenergy.com to make a payment from your checking account. You can also enroll in eBill and an email will let you know your bill is ready to view at the MyAccount site in place of receiving a mailed paper bill statement. MyAccount also provides a convenient list of your bill statement and payment history and retains your banking information for future use. Each additional account number will have to be added to your list of managed accounts within MyAccount. Pay by Phone Make payment from your checking or savings account at no charge by using our automated phone system. Please call us at 800.895.4999. Credit/Debit Card Payment All Xcel Energy residential and business customers are now eligible for payment via credit or debit card. Most major credit and debit cards accepted. Apple Pay or Google Pay is available to customers with a mobile device. To pay by phone, call our payment processing partner, Kubra EZ Pay, at 833.660.1365 To pay online, visit www.xcelenergy.com/billing_and_payment and click on the Pay with credit/debit card link to make an online credit/debit card payment through Kubra EZ Pay. Please note the current fees along with payment information: •Residential Customer Accounts o Payments accepted for up to $1,000 in a single transaction There is a $1.50 fee per transaction No fee for Wisconsin residential customer accounts •Non-Residential Customer Accounts o Payments accepted for up to $100,000 in a single transaction There is a 2.2% fee per transaction. All credit/debit card types allow a maximum 25 credit/debit card payments in a 28-rolling-day period, per Xcel Energy account, per credit/debit card. *If you receive this message: “The information provided does not match our records please try again,” while tryingto make a payment, please try again the following day after 8am CST. Page 2 of 2 Updated 03/08/2021 Overnight Payment Delivery Options Send your payment and remittance stub including account number (written on the memo line of your check) via FedEx, UPS or USPS overnight delivery to: Xcel Energy Attn: Remittance Processing 414 Nicollet Mall, 3rd Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401-1993 Overnight delivery contact phone number: 612.330.5593 The following alternate zip-codes are also valid: Minneapolis, MN 55401-1927 Minneapolis, MN 55401-4993 In-Person Pay Stations Pay in-person at a location near you by visiting xcelenergy.com for pay station locations. Please include the account number on the memo line of your check. Please note: A $1.50 transaction fee applies. ($1.45 for Western Union only in Colorado) Pay by U.S Postal Service When sending payment by U.S. mail, please include the account number on the memo line of your check. Do not combine this payment with any other Xcel Energy bill payments. Mail check payments to: Xcel Energy P.O. Box 9477 Minneapolis, MN 55484-9477 Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) (Only available to business) The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) payment process allows business customers to pay via Corporate Trade Exchange (CTX) formatted Automated Clearing House (ACH) (also referred to as EDI-820), the ability to electronically remit payment. The payments to Xcel Energy's bank accounts are initiated by the customer through a series of steps linked to the billing system. The CTX addenda records included with the funds transfer allow the posting of the payments to occur electronically to the account numbers provided by the customer. To obtain Xcel Energy’s EFT bank account numbers and to provide transfer confirmation, please email CustReceive@xcelenergy.com. Helpful hints to ensure accurate and timely processing of your payment: • For all payment options, please have your account number available and note on any payment documentation. • The hard copy invoice will be sent to you via U.S mail in the coming days. If you would like an electronic copy of our invoice prior to receiving the hard copy, please contact your Designer who is identified in the attached letter. • In order to apply payment to the correct account and avoid unnecessary delays, please make separate payments for each individual project or invoice. • Please note that depending on payment selection, it may take up to a few days to process your payment. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Noah Silver, Electrical/HVAC Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Change Order for Edinborough Park Building Automation System Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Change Order for Edinborough Park Building Automation System services with HGA for $35,850. INTRODUCTION: On March 10, 2022, HGA provided a proposal for Edinborough Park Building Automation Systems (BAS) assessment and design services for $19,690.00. T hat work was completed and resulted in a bid awarded to Northern Air Corporation (NAC) for BAS replacement and upgrades. Staff is asking for approval of an additional contract change order for $35,850.00 for construction administration and commissioning services provided by HGA for total professional services of $55,540.00. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order for Edinborough Park Building Automation System Services Agreement Contract Change Order Contract Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 300120 Department:Engineering Buyer:Derik Otten Date: 10/06/2022 Requisition Description: Edinborough Park Building Automation System Services Vendor: HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC Cost: $35,850.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: On March 10, 2022, HGA provided a proposal for Edinborough Park Building Automation Systems (BAS) assessment and design services for $19,690.00. That work was completed and resulted in a bid awarded to Northern Air Corporation (NAC) for BAS replacement and upgrades. City staff is asking for approval of an additional contract change order for $35,850.00 for construction administration and commissioning services provided by HGA for a total professional services of $55,540.00. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded by the Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Fund. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will provide greater control of the heating and cooling systems to better serve the facility and its users. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The BAS system will allow for greater control and more efficient operation of the building eletrical, heating and cooling systems. September 16, 2022 WRITER’S DIRECT DIAL 414-278-3352 Mr. Derik Otten Facilities Manager City of Edina, Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 dotten@edinamn.gov Re: BAS Controls Replacement Project at Edinborough Park Construction Administration and Commissioning Services Dear Derik: We have developed this proposal based on our discussions with you and Edina Facilities staff regarding BAS Controls at the Edinborough Park facility located at 7700 York Ave in Edina, MN. HGA architects and engineers produced scoping documents for this project which is now been awarded to a contractor. This letter proposal will be for construction administration. SCOPE OF WORK Construction Administration 1. Visit the site up to two (2) times during construction to keep the Client informed about the progress and quality of the Work completed, and to determine in general if the Work is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. Additional site visits will be compensated as an Additional Service. 2. Review or take other appropriate action upon the Contractor’s submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. 3. Prepare Change Orders, with supporting documentation, for the Client’s approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and authorize minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time which are consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. 4. Provide (1) one final site visit for approval and sign off of the work. 5. Attend bi-weekly Owner, Engineer Client meetings virtually. 6. Review final contractor as-builts and provide feedback. 7. Will review contractor pay-apps and provide verification of work completed. Assumptions and Exclusions 1. HGA assumes the construction duration will be 6 months, 2 months of it will be construction. We will not need to meet for biweekly meetings during shop drawings and procurement. 2. HGA shall not have control over or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, since these are solely the Contractor’s responsibility. HGA shall not be responsible for the Contractor’s schedules or failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. HGA shall not have control over or charge of acts or omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractor, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons performing portions of the Work. Mr. Derik Otten City of Edina – BAS controls at Edinborough Park – CA & Energy Audit September 16, 2022 Page 2 of 3 3. Special Inspections, as required by the building code or Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), for the life safety systems is not included. 4. Hazardous material documentation and removal is by others. HGA and its consultants shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to, hazardous materials in any form. 5. The Client understands and acknowledges that in the remodeling or rehabilitation of existing structures, systems or equipment certain design and technical decisions are made on assumptions based upon readily available documents and easily observed existing conditions. Unless specifically directed in writing by Client, HGA shall not perform or cause to be performed any destructive testing or open any concealed portions of the building in order to ascertain its actual condition. Because of the inexact nature of the existing documentation and observation, Change Orders and/or Construction Change Directives can be expected. 6. The Client agrees that HGA shall not be held responsible for any additional Work or costs required to correct any ensuing problems based upon such assumptions and agrees to include a reasonable budget contingency for such changes. The Client shall expect to expend such contingency for the cost of changes in the Work and Changes in the Services of HGA. PROJECT SCHEDULE HGA anticipates completing the construction administration described above in approximately six months following your notice to proceed. 1. Project Kick Off – October 2. Procurement – October to November 3. Construction – November to March 1st. 4. Project Closeout – Estimated – Spring of 2023 ADDITIONAL SERVICES HGA may be requested by you to provide Additional Services or the services of Outside Consultants, as necessary, which would be in addition to the Basic Services provided for this Proposal. Additional Services will be provided only upon your written authorization, and compensation shall be determined as part of any authorization to proceed with such services. A separate proposal will be provided upon request. Additional Services may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Provide additional site visits during construction beyond those stated above. 2. Provide other engineering and/or specialty consulting services, such as mechanical or electrical engineering design. 3. Commissioning Services COMPENSATION HGA proposes to perform the scope of Basic Services described above on an hourly not to exceed fee. The estimated reimbursable expenses for this work based on travel, printing and equipment is $450. Construction Administration Services……………………..………………………………………$18,900.00 Reimbursables…………………………………..……………..………………………………………$450.00 HVAC Commissioning……………..…………………………….………………...…………………$16,500.00 Total………………………………………………………………………………………………………$35,850.00 Mr. Derik Otten City of Edina – BAS controls at Edinborough Park – CA & Energy Audit September 16, 2022 Page 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate this opportunity to serve the City. Please call my cell if you’d like to discuss, 414-405-2244. Sincerely, Cory Powers, Principal Associate Vice President CC: Brad Kult, HGA Andrew Vavoulis, HGA Signature of Approval: __________________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.O. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: MnDOT Highway 169 Noise Wall Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for MnDOT Highway 169 Noise Wall with the State of Minnesota for $395,105. INTRODUCTION: This project will construct a noise wall along Highway 169 from Valley View Road to approximately Apache Road. This project was approved by City Council at a preliminary public hearing. The benefiting properties will be assessed 10% of the overall project cost. MnDOT will pay 90% of the project cost as part of their Noise Wall Program. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: MnDOT Highway 169 Noise Wall Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200214 Department:Engineering Buyer:Chad Millner Date: 09/23/2022 Requisition Description:MnDOT Highway 169 Noise Wall Vendor:STATE OF MINNESOTA Cost:$395,105.67 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This project will construct a noise wall along Highway 169 from Valley View Road to approximately Apache Road. This project was approved by City Council at a preliminary pubic hearing. The benefiting properties will be assessed for 10% of the overall project cost. 90% of the project cost is paid for by MnDOT as part of the Noise Wall Program. BUDGET IMPACT: The City's 10% portion is funded by special assessments to benefiting properties. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will reduce noise levels for adjacent properties and screen the highway from McCauley Trail. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This project will reduce noise levels for adjacent properties and screen the highway from McCauley Trail. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.P. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Renew AutoCAD Licenses for 3-Year Term Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase to renew 14 AutoCAD licenses for a 3-year term with DLT Solutions, LLC for $24,601. INTRODUCTION: Licenses are required to use AutoCAD and its associated programs. City staff and interns utilize AutoCAD and its associated programs to design and prepare plans for roadway and utility reconstruction projects, as well as stand alone utility, sidewalk and shared-use path projects. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Renew AutoCAD Licenses 3 Year Term Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200217 Department:Engineering Buyer:Aaron Ditzler Date: 09/26/2022 Requisition Description:Renew AutoCAD Licenses 3 Year Term Vendor:DLT SOLUTIONS INC Cost:$24,601.50 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Licenses are required to use AutoCAD and its associated programs. City staff and interns utilize AutoCAD and its associated programs to design and prepare plans for roadway and utility reconstruction projects, as well as stand alone utility, sidewalk and shared use path projects. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded from the engineering department operating budget. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: NA Service Contract ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.Q. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Waive Permit Fees for Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 6 Replacement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Waive permit fees for the Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 6 Replacement valued at $65,000. INTRODUCTION: The City Council approved replacing sanitary sewer lift station No. 6. The contract has been awarded and a permit building application is in progress. The building permits are estimated at $65,000. Staff requests waiving permit fees on this project. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.R. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Agreements with Soo Line Railroad Company dba Canadian Pacific Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve agreements with Soo Line Railroad Company dba Canadian Pacific to allow the construction of a shared-use path supported by a retaining wall along the south side of Eden Avenue under the CP Rail Bridge. INTRODUCTION: The agreement allows the City to construct, maintain and operate a shared-use path along Eden Avenue under the CP Rail Bridge in accordance to the requirement stated. ATTACHMENTS: Description Agreement Exhibit A of Agreement Wall Plans Exhibit B Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors Working on CP Property Exhibit C Right of Entry License Agreement Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ___ day of ________, 2022 (the “Effective Date”) by and between the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”) and Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific (“CP”), whose business address is 120 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City proposes to construct a new retaining wall and sidewalk for pedestrian and bicycle traffic under CP’s bridge at or near mile post 17.85 on the MN&S Subdivision in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, CP’s property under which the retaining wall and sidewalk shall be constructed (the “Property”) is depicted in the plan marked Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, and described in the license agreements marked Exhibits B and C attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the parties desire the construction of the retaining wall and sidewalk to be performed in accordance with plans, specifications, and special provisions prepared by the City and approved by CP; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto in accordance with Minnesota statutes; and WHEREAS, the classification of the Project is in accordance with the most recent edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Standard Specifications for Construction; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set forth the terms and conditions for establishment, construction, and maintenance of said retaining wall and sidewalk; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreement as hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The City shall secure or cause to be secured, without cost or assessment to CP, any and all rights required for or incidental to the Project except as provided herein. 2. This Agreement is subject to the superior title of CP to the Property and to all other outstanding and superior rights, if any; and the City shall not, by reason of rights hereby granted, acquire or assert title to any of the Property adverse to CP’s title. CP shall have the continuing and compatible right to use and occupy the Property for railroad construction, operation, and maintenance purposes and repair its facilities within the limits of the retaining wall and sidewalk and to construct such other facilities as from time to time it may choose. The City’s right to use and maintain the retaining wall and sidewalk is at all times subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk 2 3. The City shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and submit for CP approval prior to construction of the Project all necessary plans and specifications covering construction of the retaining wall and sidewalk, approaches thereto, drainage, and all work incidental thereto generally in the area of CP’s right-of-way and facilities. The parties intend that all construction within CP’s right-of-way will be restricted to the shaded areas designated on the attached Exhibit A. Upon CP’s approval of the plans and specifications, the City shall construct the Project in accordance thereto and will supervise and furnish engineering and inspection for all work performed thereunder. 4. No change shall be made on any approved plan or specification by either party hereto without prior written consent of the other party insofar as the same relates to CP’s facilities or operations. 5. The parties hereto shall perform, or cause to be performed, in accordance with detailed plans and specifications approved by CP, the following items of work: A. Work by the City The City or its contractor(s) shall furnish or cause to be furnished, at the sole cost and expense of the City, all labor, material, work equipment and tools and perform all work necessary to construct and complete the following: (i) The preparation of the retaining wall and sidewalk plans and specifications. (ii) The construction of the new retaining wall and sidewalk. (iii) The construction of any necessary trail and utility improvements adjacent to said retaining wall and sidewalk including traffic control, grading, paving, drainage, and utility work. (iv) The completion of site restoration, including but not limited to restoring drainage and establishing vegetation. (v) Survey monitoring of CP’s bridge piers for movement and settlement throughout the duration of construction of the Project. (vi) Incidental work necessary to complete the items hereinabove specified. (vii) The City shall provide CP with as-built plans upon completion of the Project. B. Work by CP CP or its contractor shall furnish or cause to be furnished, at the sole cost and expense of the City, all labor, material, work equipment and tools and perform all work necessary to construct and complete the following: (i) Provide flagging and watchman protection. Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk 3 (ii) Review retaining wall and sidewalk plans and specifications. (iii) Review construction submittals and RFIs, as applicable. (iv) Perform construction observation, as deemed necessary by CP. (v) Incidental work necessary to complete the items hereinabove specified. All CP Work shall be at the City’s cost and expense on a CP supplied materials and labor basis, including review of the City’s plans. CP shall invoice the City monthly for such cost and expense, which the City shall cause to be paid in accordance with its regular procedures, applicable statutes, and regulations. CP’s costs associated with CP Work under this Agreement will be based on CP’s applicable rates and internal overheads (including labor, material and equipment overheads) and any value added, sales, goods and services, or similar tax which may be imposed on any such amounts pursuant to any federal, state, or local law. 6. Upon completion of the Project, the City shall thereafter inspect, maintain, repair, and renew the retaining wall and sidewalk at its sole cost and expense. 7. The City agrees that in the event that any drainage or similar conditions develops on CP’s right-of-way and substantially interferes with CP’s operations because of the Project or its subsequent installation, upon receipt of written notice from CP, the City will promptly remedy or eliminate such condition. 8. CP assumes no responsibility for the design, construction, or operation of the retaining wall and sidewalk. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City shall release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CP for any and all accidents, injury, and/or property damage that may be result of the design, construction, or operation of the retaining wall and sidewalk. This indemnification obligation shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. The Parties agree that railroad traffic must be maintained during Project construction and that train movement and rail operations have priority over Project construction. Rail operations include the movement of rail equipment as well as trains, and the construction or repair of railroad track, structures, communications, and appurtenances thereto. The City agrees that in the event the Project causes any condition on CP’s right-of-way that substantially interferes with railroad operations, upon receipt of CP’s written notice, the City will promptly remedy or eliminate such condition. 10. If any tracks, facilities, or equipment owned, used, or maintained by CP are damaged in connection with the City’s Work, CP will repair (or arrange for the repair of) such damage and the City will pay the full cost of such repair. Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk 4 11. Prior to entering the Property, the City and its contractor(s) will arrange to execute CP’s standard Right of Entry License Agreement (“ROE License Agreement”) attached as Exhibit C; and must adhere to CP’s standard Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors attached thereto. In addition, the City and its contractor(s) must at all times when on railroad property use personal protective equipment as follows: hard hats, orange reflectorized safety vests, safety glasses, and safety boots. All City Work and related activities of the City and its employees, agents, and contractors in connection with this Agreement shall be deemed “Work” under the License Agreement, and shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of the License Agreement, and all rights, obligations, and remedies of the parties under the License Agreement with respect to such Work shall be cumulative to those provided hereunder. 12. The City shall secure, at the City’s own expense, any permits or licenses required by state or local laws or ordinances and shall comply with all applicable laws, including but not limited to any laws, regulations, standards, and permit requirements relating to environmental pollution or contamination or to occupational health and safety. 13. In the event that the City does not enter into a contract for construction of the Project contemplated by this agreement on or before a day twelve (12) months after the date this Agreement is fully executed, then either party may, at any time thereafter, serve notice of cancellation upon the other party, by registered mail, and this Agreement shall immediately be cancelled and terminated. 14. The obligations of the parties under this Agreement, other than payment, shall be subject to force majeure (which shall include strikes, riots, floods, accidents, Acts of God, and other causes or circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the party claiming such force majeure as an excuse for non-performance), but only as long as, and to the extent that, such force majeure shall prevent performance of the obligations. In the event that an incident of force majeure impairs a party’s ability to fulfill its obligations to the other party under this Agreement, said party shall take reasonable measures to restore performance of its obligations in a timely manner. 15. This Agreement and each and every provision hereof is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and not for the benefit of any third person. Nothing herein contained shall be taken as creating or increasing any right of any third person to recover by way of damages or otherwise against any party hereto. 16. No consent or waiver, expressed or implied, by a party of any breach or default by the other party in the performance by such other party of its obligations hereunder shall be deemed or construed to be a consent to or waiver of any other breach or default in the performance hereunder by such other party. Failure on the part of a party to complain of any act or failure of the other party or to declare the other party in default, irrespective of how long such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver by such first mentioned party of its rights hereunder. Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk 5 17. Each definition in this Agreement includes the singular and the plural, and references in this Agreement to the neuter gender include the masculine and feminine where appropriate. References herein to any agreement or contract mean such agreement or contract as amended. As used in this Agreement, the word “including” means “without limitation,” and the words “herein”, “hereof,” and “hereunder” refer to this Agreement as a whole. All dollar amounts stated herein are in United States currency. 18. The division of this Agreement into sections and subsections and the insertion of headings and section numbers are for convenience of reference only, and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this Agreement. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to sections are to sections of this Agreement. 19. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as creating an association, partnership, joint venture, or other joint undertaking between the parties hereto. 20. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to any choice or conflict of laws principles (whether of the State of Minnesota or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Minnesota. All proceedings related to this Agreement shall be venued in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 21. If for any reason any provision of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof shall not be affected thereby. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that in the event any term or provision herein is determined to be unenforceable as written, but could be enforced if limited, then such provision shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 22. The language used in this Agreement should be deemed the language chosen by the parties hereto to express their mutual intent, and no rule of strict construction shall be applied against either party. 23. This Agreement is the full, complete, and entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subjects hereof, and any and all prior writings, representations, and negotiations with respect to those subjects are superseded by this Agreement. No term or provision of this Agreement may be changed, waived, discharged or terminated except by an instrument in writing and signed by both parties. 24. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties’ respective successors and assigns. 25. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one and the same document. The parties may execute more than one copy of this Agreement, each of which shall constitute an original. Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original by their duly authorized officers effective when the City and CP have endorsed their acceptance thereon. THE CITY OF EDINA SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY BY: _____________________ BY: _____________________ Chad Millner Daniel Sabatka Director of Engineering Director Public Works Attest: Attest: ___________________ Brian Osborne Manager Public Works BY: ____________________ Scott Neal City Manager Attest: ________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Sharon Allison, City Clerk Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk EXHIBIT A General Plan and Elevation Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk EXHIBIT B Occupancy License Agreement Edina Retaining Wall/Sidewalk EXHIBIT C Right of Entry License Agreement T-BURGG GGGGGGGGGGGT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURP-BURP-BUR30"SST14"14"18"12"12"12"12"16"16"10"30"STST20931922.18UCT11861915.05UCT11863918.67UCT11870920.19UPL B11871920.33UPL1 B11872922.52UCTIIIIIIIIIII>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO GGT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURP-BURP-BURP-BURP-BURP-BURP-BUR>>>>>> > > > >>>P-BURP-BURP-BURXXXXXFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOST-1P-OHP-OHP-OHP-OHT - BUR T-BURT-BURT-BURT-BURFOFOFOFOT-B U R T-B U R T-B U R T-B U R T-B U R T-B U R T-B U R T- B U R T- B U R T-B U R T-B U R T- B U R T- B U R T- B U R T- B U R T- B U RP-BURP-BURP-BURP-BURP-BURGGGGGGGGGGIIIIIIIIIIG00+1400+1500+1400+1500+ 33000+100000+1001PT STA=1001+02.09507715.8539143032.6068PC STA=1000+90.80507705.8864143027.3295PT STA=1000+71.27507688.0082143019.4616PC STA=1000+51.30507670.9558143009.1803PT STA=1000+48.07507668.4249143007.1713PC STA=1000+26.84507650.2124142996.3820PT STA=1000+25.10507648.5828142995.7720R78.00R78.00R78.00915920925930935940915920925930935940920.5 920.5 915.8 917.95999+501000+001001+001001+50FINISHED GRADE AT F.F. OF WALLBOTTOM OF MOMENT SLABBOTTOM OF KEY30'-6"20'-0"20'-0"15'-3"15'-3"2'-3"21'-3"3'-3"20'-0"19'-6"4'-3"STA. 1000+24.58ELEV. 917.12STA. 1000+55.07ELEV. 916.88STA. 1000+75.07ELEV. 916.49STA. 1000+95.09ELEV. 915.8790ANCKI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.RETAINING WALL 'A' PARAPET WALLRETAINING WALL PLANS1REVISED WALL ANCKRADSave: 8/2/2022 4:27 PM rknowles Plot: 8/2/2022 4:28 PM X:\AE\E\EDINA\156818\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\20-Struct\cad\dwg\sheet\GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION - REV WALL A 2022.dwgRev.#Designed ByDrawn ByChecked ByDescriptionDateSEH ProjectRevision IssueRev.#DescriptionDateRevision IssueDATELICENSE NO.of156818EDINA, MINNESOTAEDEN AVE & BROOKSIDE AVEIMPROVEMENTS1184/19/202143836NATHAN C. KLOPP, P.E.TITLE90-90ARETAINING WALL 'A'SHEET INDEXNO.92RETAINING WALL 'B'93RETAINING WALL SECTION94GENERAL NOTES AND SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES95RETAINING WALL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS (SHORT WALLS)96RETAINING WALL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS (MEDIUM WALLS)RETAINING WALL MISCELLANEOUS DETAILSRETAINING WALL GEOTECHNICAL DETAILS97-99100-102103PANEL TABULATIONS WALL 'A'104PANEL TABULATIONS WALL 'B'105SPREAD FOOTING GEOMETRY AND DATA106ORNAMENTAL METAL RAILING0feetscale1020105EXISTING BR27646FOOTING OUTLINESOUTH ABUTMENTEXISTING BR27646PIER FOOTINGOUTLINEOUTLINE OF FOOTINGRETAINING WALL AF.F.REFERENCE LINEEXTENTS OF EXCAVATIONR69.00'PC STA.4+01.98507597.762142985.657PT STA.4+23.54507618.605142990.8461234ORNAMENTAL METAL RAILINGEDEN AVENUESOUTH TRAIL4" DIA. PERF. DRAIN PIPESOO LINE RAILROAD COR79.00'PC STA.4+34.99507630.010142991.849567CONCRETE SLOPE PAVINGREMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE SLOPE PAVING. MATCHEXISTING EXTENTS BEHIND WALL.STEP FOOTING OVER 24" DIA RCP STORM SEWER.4" DIA. PERF. DRAIN PIPE. SEE RETAINING WALL DETAILS.CONNECT TO STORM SEWER ST-207.SIZE AND LOCATION UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY.E = WALL EXPANSION JOINT = WALL JOINTA1 = WALL PANELF1 = FOOTING111108RETAINING WALL 'C'109-110RETAINING WALL C DETAILSSTA.4+36.20507631.212142991.964STA.4+44.58507639.482142993.2652STA.4+40.00±233ST-2073107CONCRETE SLOPE PAVING UNDER BRIDGESEARTH RETENTION SYSTEM1414567CENTURYLINK4AT&T FIBER OPTICPC STA.1000+26.84 PT STA.1000+48.07 PC STA.1000+51.30 PT STA.1000+71.27 PC STA.1000+90.80A4A5A6OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS 2'-0" MIN.1'-0"8'-0"1'-6"LEVEL1.50%1'-0" 12"VARIES FROM 2'-0" TO 3'-2 14"INTENTIONAL ROUGHEN 14" AMPLITUDEBAR BBAR C3" CLR, TYPBAR FBAR GCLOSED-CELL POLYPROPYLENE FOAMEXPANSION MATERIAL AT FACE OF PIER(TYP.)W.R. MEADOWS, INC X-FOAM, NOMACONOMAFLEX, OR EQUAL APPROVED.OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTBAR HPARAPET WALLREINFORCEMENTPARAPET WALLSECTIONSHEAR KEYFRONT FACE OF WALL3"BAR B @ ABOUT 12"3"4"BAR A TOP AND BOTTOM@ ABOUT 12"4"3" CLEARBAR C @ ABOUT 12" SPACING3" CLEARBAR F @ ABOUT 12" SPACINGFRONT AND BACK FACEBAR G @ ABOUT 12" SPACINGWALL PANEL LENGTH 1BOTTOM OF SHEAR KEYBOTTOM OF FOOTINGPARAPET WALLFOOTING PLANPARAPET WALLELEVATION1SEE PLAN AND ELEVATION FOR WALL LENGTHS2.002.00MNDOT TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILEFABRIC BETWEEN GRANULARBACKFILL AND EXISTING SOIL(TYP.)4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC (SDR-26)PIPE PER MNDOT SPEC. 3248WRAPPED WITH APPROVEDGEOTEXTILE PER MNDOT SPEC. 3373(TYP.)11STRUCTURALBACKFILL SPEC.3149.2.D.2Save: 8/2/2022 4:54 PM rknowles Plot: 8/2/2022 4:54 PM X:\AE\E\EDINA\156818\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\20-Struct\cad\dwg\sheet\STANDARD PLAN SHEETS.dwgRev.#Designed ByDrawn ByChecked ByDescriptionDateSEH ProjectRevision IssueRev.#DescriptionDateRevision IssueDATELICENSE NO.of156818EDINA, MINNESOTAEDEN AVE & BROOKSIDE AVEIMPROVEMENTS1184/19/202143836NATHAN C. KLOPP, P.E.107ANCKI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.NCKRADPARAPET WALLRETAINING WALL PLANS 15+0090591091592092593090591091592092593001020304050600-10-20-30-4015+22.21905910915920925905910915920925010203040500-10-20-30-40-5015+5090591091592092593090591091592092593001020304050600-10-20-30-40-50-6015+70.639059109159209259059109159209250102030400-10-20-30-40-50-60R18.67'915.170.8%Vertical 0.0%Vertical 50.0%0.7%2.0%0.9%R18.67'914.79R18.67'914.79L18.17'914.941.5%Vertical0.0%Vertical 50 . 0%2.0%1.1%1.5%Vertical0.0%Vertical 50 . 0%2.0%1.1%2.0%1.5%R18.67'914.43L18.17'914.502.0%1.6%VerticalVertical 4:12.0%1.5%R18.67'914.19 L18.33'914.29 2.0%1.4%Vertical Vertical 4:140.0%1.5%Ex.℄913.6P.℄913.59 Ex.℄913.2P.℄913.21 Ex.℄912.9P.℄912.85 Ex.℄912.6 P.℄912.61 APPROX. BRIDGEPIER LOCATIONAND DIMENSIONSAPPROX. BRIDGEABUTMENTFOOTING6' SWBOTTOM OFBRIDGE APPROX.929.50'APPROX. BRIDGEPIER LOCATIONAND DIMENSIONS1H: 1 V CLOSED CELL POLYPROPYLENE FOAMEXPANSION MATERIAL TO BE PLACEDBETWEEN WALK AND PIERSW.R. MEADOWS, INC. X-FOAM, NOMACONOMAFLEX, OR EQUAL APPROVED.EXPANSION MATERIALTO BE PLACEDBETWEEN WALK ANDPIERSEDEN AVENUE113Save: 8/2/2022 4:20 PM rknowles Plot: 8/2/2022 4:24 PM X:\AE\E\EDINA\156818\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\10-Civil\cad\dwg\ED156818_FG rev 3 2022.dwg 118Sheet No.OfSheets 1 Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors Working on CP Property in the United States Approval Authority: Corporate Risk Effective Date: October 1, 2018 Version: 3.0 Revision Date: October 1, 2021 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 1 Application ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Definitions and Interpretation.............................................................................. 3 3 Contractor Compliance & Responsibilities ........................................................ 5 4 Site Safety Plans .................................................................................................. 7 5 Safety Training...................................................................................................... 7 6 Safety Orientation ................................................................................................. 7 7 Safety Job Briefing .............................................................................................. 7 8 Applicable Legislation ......................................................................................... 8 9 Security Access to CP Property ......................................................................... 9 10 Personal Conduct .............................................................................................. 10 11 Personal Protection........................................................................................... 12 12 Railroad Track Protection ............................................................................... 133 13 HAZCOM ............................................................................................................. 17 14 Operation of Highway Vehicles ........................................................................ 18 15 Tools, Equipment and Machinery .................................................................... 19 16 Emergency Response ....................................................................................... 21 17 Confined Space ................................................................................................. 23 18 Reportable Accidents, Incidents and Injuries ................................................. 23 19 Reporting ........................................................................................................... 24 20 Contractor & Contractor Personnel Acknowledgement ................................ 25 21 Attachment A - Emergency Information Sheet ............................................... 27 3 Introduction At Canadian Pacific (CP), safety is an integral part of the way we do business. We expect everyone working on Canadian Pacific’s property to be unconditionally committed to safety. Safety must be given top priority and will take precedence over deadlines, production schedules, and all other considerations. 1 Application 1.1 Application 1.1.1 These Minimum Safety Requirements are applicable to all who work on CP property (except as noted in 1.13 and 1.14 below) including Contractors and other persons performing Work or otherwise providing services to Canadian Pacific on CP Property in the United States. 1.1.2 These Minimum Safety Requirements cannot be waived or altered, in whole or in part, without a prior Risk Assessment specific to the Work being conducted, and written consent has been provided by Manager-in-Charge. 1.1.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, these Minimum Safety Requirements do not apply to other railroad companies who only operate trains on CP Property under various trackage or interchange agreements. 1.1.4 Further notwithstanding the foregoing, these Minimum Safety Requirements may not apply to Work or services provided in CP office premises, in which case, CP’s Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors Working in CP Offices may apply. 2 Definitions and Interpretation 2.1 Definitions 2.1.1 In these Minimum Safety Requirements, the following capitalized terms shall have the ascribed meaning below: (a) “Applicable Legislation” means all applicable legislation, regulations, by-laws, codes, rules, standards, policies, procedures, promulgated by any federal, state, and municipal governmental body, including those of its agencies, having authority over CP and, or a Contractor in relation to the Work in the matter of health and safety of the person, property and, or the environment; (b) “Canadian Pacific” or “CP” means Canadian Pacific Railway Company Ltd., and its subsidiaries and affiliates, and includes each of their respective directors, officers, employees, agent, and representatives; (c) “CP Personnel” means CP’s employees, agents, and representatives; (d) “CP Property” means any building, facility, yard, track, right of way or other property owned or controlled by CP; (e) “Contractor” means the company or person, and their respective employees and authorized agents, representative and subcontractors who are providing goods or services to CP; or on behalf of a third party working on CP property. (f) “Contractor Personnel” means the Contractor’s employees, and authorized agents, representative and subcontractors; (g) “Co-mingled Work” means Work where Contractor Personnel works directly with or, in close proximity (time or space) to CP Personnel; 4 (h) “eTest” an efficiency test. It is a planned procedure to evaluate compliance with rules, instructions and procedures, with or without the employee's knowledge. (i) “Foul of Track” means the placement of an individual or equipment within 4’ feet of the outside rail of a railway track that could be struck by a moving train or on- track work equipment (e.g. Hi-rail equipment). (j) “Hazardous Materials” means any substance, which is hazardous to persons or property and includes, without limiting the generality of the foregoing: (i) radioactive, explosive, poisonous, or toxic substances; (ii) any substance that if added to any water, would degrade or alter the quality of the water to the extent that it is detrimental to its use by man or by any animal, or plant; (iii) any solid, liquid, gas or odor or combination of any of them that, if emitted into the air, would create or contribute to the creation of a condition of the air that endangers the health, safety, or welfare of persons, or the health of animal life, or causes damage to plant life or to property; and (iv) substances declared to be hazardous, toxic or dangerous under any law or regulation now or hereafter enacted by any governmental authority having jurisdiction. (k) “Manager-in-Charge” means a CP manager as designated or otherwise identified by CP as being responsible for overseeing the Work to be performed, such Manager-in-Charge may include, but is not limited to Local CP Management, Superintendents, Chief Engineers, and Project Managers. (l) “Mobile Equipment” means any motorized and self-propelled equipment, excluding railroad equipment and highway vehicles, but including, for example, forklifts, tractors, cranes, ATVs, mules, motorized scissor lifts, telescopic boom lifts, and similar equipment that are not designed to operate or move on railroad tracks; (m) “Office Premises” means any building, facility, or portion thereof, or other premises, whether owned or controlled by CP, which is used solely for clerical or administrative purposes and which does not contain heavy equipment or machinery, as designated by CP from time to time; (n) “Qualified and Authorized” means a status attained by a person who has successfully completed any required training and demonstrated proficiency in the duties of a particular position or function and who has been given the right to act. (o) “Railroad Equipment” means trains, locomotives, railcars, on track equipment (track units), hi-rail vehicles and any other equipment designed to operate or move on railroad tracks; (p) “Site Safety Plan” means a documented plan which set out how Work is to be conducted in a safe manner, as required by Applicable Legislation, see 3.15 c); (q) “Third Party Project” means any work being performed on CP property that CP is not managing (i.e, road authority, utility company, commuter agency, or other similar entity, are on CP property for their own purposes, and not a project sponsored or managed by CP. (r) “Work” means the provision of products and services and related activities; (s) “Work Site” means any CP Property where CP Personnel or Contractor Personnel are present, or permitted to be present, while engaged in any Work, including any railroad equipment, mobile equipment and highway vehicles operated by or used to convey a person engaged in such Work. This applies also to work immediately adjacent to CP property which can pose a risk to safe railway operations (i.e., blasting, excavation next to ROW, etc). 5 2.2 Interpretation & Application 2.2.1 Where legislation is referred to in these Minimum Safety Requirements, it shall include all amendments and replacements thereto as promulgated from time to time. 2.2.2 Where standards, such as those of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), are referred to in these Minimum Safety Requirements, they shall include all amendments and replacements thereof from time to time. 2.2.3 Where there is any ambiguity, inconsistencies, or omissions between or among any agreements with CP, expressed or implied; any Applicable Legislations; any applicable CP policies and practices; and any applicable industrial standards and practices, Contractor and Contractor Personnel shall adhere to that which is most stringent and current. 3 Contractor Compliance & Responsibilities 3.1 General Compliance 3.1.1 Contractor shall be fully and solely responsible for ensuring the health and safety of Contractor Personnel and for ensuring that its Work and other activities do not compromise the health and safety of CP Personnel or any other party, the protection of the environment, the protection of CP’s property and those of any other party, and do not interfere with the safety of CP’s railroad operations. 3.1.2 Contractor shall comply with and shall ensure all of Contractor Personnel are trained and qualified to safely perform the Work and that they comply with all Applicable Legislation pertaining to the protection against fire, safety, health, and environmental hazards, and with any license, permits, authorizations issued by the respective authority. Contractor shall provide CP with written certification that Contractor's safety program required by 49 CFR Part 243 has been approved by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) where applicable. 3.1.3 Contractor shall comply with and shall ensure all of Contractor Personnel comply with all terms and conditions of all agreements, expressed or implied, between Contractor and CP, and all applicable CP policies and practices. 3.1.4 Subject to the requirements of CP’s Access Control Procedures, the contractor shall provide CP eRailsafe training for each employee engaged in work on CP property. Where there is no agreement between CP and the Contractor, the Contractor is responsible for meeting the additional requirements outlines within CP’s Access Control Procedures. 3.1.5 Contractor shall provide Contractor Personnel, at its own expense, any and all safety equipment required to protect against injuries during the performance of the Work and shall ensure that Contractor Personnel are knowledgeable of and utilize safe practices in performing the Work. 3.1.6 The Contractor shall have a copy of the following documents at the Work Site at all times, and shall produce them as and when requested by CP: (a) These Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors Working on CP Property; (b) Licenses, certifications, permits, training records or other documents required by Applicable Legislation or these Minimum Safety Requirements; (c) Contractor’s Site Safety Plan; (d) Contractor’s Emergency Information Sheet (see Attachment A); and (e) Any additional documents required by Contract or by agreement with Manager-in-Charge. (f) Employee identification (eRailsafe badge – see 9.1.1). 6 3.2 Compliance Assurance 3.2.1 CP reserves the right to observe, inspect, test and audit Contractor and Contractor Personnel for compliance with all requirements herein, and to demand and receive all relevant records, documentation, and materials evidencing compliance, at any time, and from time to time. 3.2.2 Failure of the Contractor or Contractor Personnel to comply with any applicable provisions herein may be considered a material breach, and in addition to all other remedies available, CP may without prejudice: (a) take over control of that Work or activity; (b) order the Work to stop; and/or (c) order Contractor Personnel to leave CP Property. 3.2.3 Upon the earlier of the completion of the Work, the expiration of the applicable agreement, or the request of a Manager-in-Charge, Contractor and Contractor Personnel shall return all identification, badges, access cards, and decals, issued or provided by CP to the Manager-in-Charge. 4 Site Safety Plans 4.1 General Requirements 4.1.1 Prior to starting any Work on CP Property, the Contractor must have a written Site Safety Plan that identifies: (a) All applicable legislation, rules, policies and work practices in relation to the work being performed; (b) Specific hazards that are associated with the Work being performed on CP property for CP, and Work being performed not for CP: for example: (i) Construction, maintenance or inspections of buildings; (ii) Working on or adjacent to railroad tracks; (iii) Maintenance or inspection or railroad tracks, crossings or signal systems; (iv) Operating Railroad Equipment on CP tracks; or (v) When/where Contractor Personnel work directly with or in proximity (time or space) to CP Personnel; and (c) Methods of verifying compliance. 4.1.2 The Contractor will provide Manager-In-Charge with a copy of this Site Safety Plan on reasonable request. 4.1.3 The Contractor must be able to demonstrate an awareness of applicable legislation, rules, policies and work practices in relation to the work being performed. 7 5 Safety Training 5.1 Minimum Training & Qualifications 5.1.1 At its sole cost and expense, Contractor shall ensure that all Contractor Personnel be fully trained and qualified for the Work they will be performing. Contractors and Contractor Personnel shall meet, or exceed, all Applicable Legislation requirements relating to training and qualification, including but not limited to the requirements of 49 CFR Part 243. 5.1.2 Additionally, Contractor Personnel training and qualification shall meet or exceed all applicable industry standards. 5.2 Proof of Training & Qualification 5.2.1 Contractor Personnel shall at all times have proof of such training and qualifications and shall produce them as and when requested by the Manager-in-Charge. 5.2.2 CP reserves the right to inspect qualification certificates, licenses, training records and/or Work- history records for any Contractor Personnel, and, or to be provided with copies thereof, on reasonable request. In addition, CP reserves the right to perform eTests on contractor employees, and request discipline for non-conformance. 6 Safety Orientation 6.1 General Requirements 6.1.1 Prior to beginning Work, all Contractor Personnel shall participate in a CP authorized safety orientation, including on-site orientation presented by the Manager-in-Charge or designate. 6.1.2 Any time the scope of Work, location, condition or supervision changes, Contractor Personnel may be required to attend additional safety orientation sessions. 6.1.3 After successful completion of such safety orientation, Contractors must be able to produce company identification or an eRailsafe photo identification badge authorizing access to CP property unescorted for the purposes of conducting work. Managers have the ability to enter the tracking code into CM (Compliance management). Third parties who hire subcontractors must ensure required compliance while on CP property. The eRailsafe identification card shall be worn or be made visible at all times, or produced upon request and cannot be transferred under any circumstances. 7 Job Safety Briefing 7.1.1 Contractor Personnel shall attend all Job Safety Briefings as and when conducted. Contractor Personnel shall be solely and fully responsible for understanding the content of the Job Safety Briefing, and at a minimum shall: (a) have an understanding of the scope of Work to be performed and an appreciation of the nature of the location, environment, and conditions where such Work is to be performed; (b) be aware of specific or unusual hazardous condition, existing or potential and the control measures required to protect against, control, mitigate, or where possible, avoid said hazard; and (c) have an emergency response plan/evacuation procedures. 8 7.1.2 Where Contractor Personnel are working directly with or in proximity (time or space) to CP Personnel, job safety briefings must include both CP Personnel and Contractor Personnel, and any other affected third parties. The job safety briefing shall identify nature and extent of the interaction between the Work being performed by Contractor Personnel, and those performed by CP Personnel or other third parties. Contractor Personnel shall inform CP Personnel, and any other third parties of known or potential unsafe conditions and hazards that may be created by, resulting from, or inherent in their Work and the corresponding preventative, mitigation, and/or control measures at all job briefings prior to commencing Work, or as soon as Contractor Personnel becomes aware of such conditions. 7.1.3 In all situations, all Contractor Personnel are expected to: (a) continually identify hazards and assess risk of hazards and to continually and clearly communicate all hazards to the Manager-in-Charge and to all other parties that may be affected at job safety briefings, and at any other time as and when appropriate or necessary; (b) take actions that are within their assigned responsibility to eliminate or control hazards and risks; and (c) immediately notify their supervisor or the Manager-in-Charge of hazards that pose unacceptable risk that they are unable to eliminate or control. 7.1.4 Where Contractor Personnel are unable to eliminate or control a hazard, Contractor Personnel shall take interim measures to protect people, property, equipment and the environment until the hazard can be properly assessed and appropriate corrective actions taken. 8 Applicable Legislation 8.1 General Requirements 8.1.1 Contractor and Contractor Personnel shall be solely responsible for identifying and complying with all Applicable Legislation. At a minimum, Contractor and Contractor Personnel shall comply with the federal legislations set out below which list is intended solely for general guidance, and not as a comprehensive list of all Applicable Legislation. 8.1.2 Additionally, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) is an industry association which can provide support and guidance on matters related to railroad safety and the transportation of hazardous materials. 8.2 Transportation of Hazardous Materials 8.2.1 When Work involves the handling or transportation of hazardous materials (hazmat), that Work must comply with Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and regulations administered by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). 8.2.2 Contractors shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all Contractor Personnel who handles, offers for transport and/or transports hazmat by any transportation mode are trained and hold a valid training certificate or is working under the direct supervision of someone who is trained and holds a valid training certificate. That training must be based on the Work that the person is expected to perform and the hazmat that the person is expected to handle, offer for transport or transport. 8.2.3 All U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) regulations are published in Chapter I of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR). 9 8.3 Railroad Work 8.3.1 When Work involves the construction, alteration, operation, inspection and maintenance of any part of the general railroad system of transportation, that Work must comply with the Federal Railroad Safety Act and regulations administered by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). 8.3.2 Contractors shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all Contractor Personnel who perform railroad Work are trained and qualified in accordance with those regulations and hold valid certificates when required. 8.3.3 All FRA regulations are published in Chapter II of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR). 8.4 Occupational Safety & Health 8.4.1 Any Work being performed that may create a risk to the health and safety of any person, including CP Personnel and Contractor Personnel, when not covered by FRA regulations shall be governed by U.S. Department of Labor regulations administered by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 8.4.2 All OSHA regulations are published in Chapter XVII of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (29 CFR). 8.5 Environmental Protection 8.5.1 Where Work is being performed that may impact the environment, that Work must comply with all applicable federal state, and local government legislation, regulations and standards. 8.5.2 Federal legislation is generally administered by the Environmental Protection Agency. A compilation of those laws and regulations can be accessed at http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/ 9 Security Access to CP Property 9.1.1 All Contractor Personnel must have personal identification and/or eRrailsafe credentials authorizing access and in their possession at all times while on CP Property, and present them for review to any Manager-in-Charge, other CP managers and employees, Police Officer, security guard, or regulatory officer upon request: (a) photo identification (e.g. driver’s license); and (b) proof of employment, document or card; and (c) CP safety orientation certificate; or (d) building access pass issued by CP or third party having control over CP premises; or (e) CP security photo ID card or badge; or (f) other proof of safety orientation and access authorization issued by CP. (g) Valid eRailsafe card 9.1.2 Where any Work requires Contractor Personnel to ride in locomotive or other non-passenger railroad equipment, the Contractor must also possess a CP ACCESS PASS for riding non- passenger railroad equipment, signed by the responsible operating manager. Such a signed pass must be presented to the train crew or operator when boarding the equipment. Failure to possess such a pass will result in the equipment not moving, removal from the equipment, and/or the filing of trespasser charges. 10 9.2 Security Awareness 9.2.1 Contractor shall conduct employee background checks as is necessary to ensure that Contractor Personnel do not pose a security risk to CP, such security risk includes the risk of the commission of terrorist activities, sabotage, vandalism, theft, and violence. CP reserves the right, at all times, to require that Contractors undertake certain security training and/or performs background checks on Contractor Personnel, prior to allowing such Contractor Personnel to enter onto CP Property. 9.2.2 On request CP can make available a copy of CP’s Railway Security Awareness Program for use by Contractor Personnel. 9.3 Firearms & Explosives 9.3.1 Firearms (loaded or empty) are not permitted on CP Property, except for Police officers and other designated government officials when authorized to do so. 9.3.2 No explosives will be permitted on CP Property without written approval by the Manager-in-Charge. 9.4 Reporting Contractor Personnel must report any security concern, security incident, criminal activity (known or suspected), suspicious happenings and/or suspicious persons on CP Property to the Manager-in-Charge or to CP Police Services in accordance with Section 18. 10 Personal Conduct 10.1 Drug and Alcohol Prohibition CP recognizes the problem of alcohol and substance abuse in today’s society. This problem poses particular concerns to an employer who is subject to governmental regulations and seeks to promote the safety of the general public. CP has a concern for the safety, health and well-being of its employees as well as an obligation to comply with the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) regulations. CP will comply with all statutes and regulations administered by the FRA in implementing the required 49 CFR §219 Drug and Alcohol Program. CP also expects employees of other railroads, visitors or contractors to comply with this regulation while on CP property, consistent with federal regulations. If subject to this regulation, Contractor shall be solely responsible for compliance with the 49 CFR Part 219. Contractor shall provide CP with proof of its compliance prior to performing services for CP and continued proof of compliance must be provided to CP immediately upon request. This proof of compliance will include, but will not be limited to, a copy of the 49 CFR §219 Drug and Alcohol Program Plan and FRA Approval Letter and Continued Certification of Compliance and Statistical Reporting. Periodic audits to ensure compliance with these regulations may be performed and cooperation and compliance is expected upon request. If subject to other DOT modalities and regulations, such as the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration (FMCSA), compliance of that modality’s drug and alcohol program guidelines will be required and periodic audits to ensure compliance with these regulations may be performed and cooperation and compliance is expected upon request. 10.1.1 Entry onto CP Property when in possession of, or under the influence of alcohol, intoxicants, narcotics, or controlled substances is strictly prohibited. Controlled substances include all Schedule 1 drugs (such as marijuana and “medical marijuana”) and synthetic/designer drugs and/or any intoxicants or products labeled “not intended for human consumption”. 10.1.2 The sale, trade, and/or offer for sale alcohol or controlled substances are prohibited. 11 10.1.3 Additionally, Contractor Personnel shall be free of any condition which may in any way adversely affect alertness, concentration, responsiveness, or the ability react calmly and responsibly to safety hazards. 10.1.4 CP reserves the right to request drug and/or alcohol tests for Contractor Personnel as and where required or permitted by law. 10.2 Inappropriate Behavior 10.2.1 CP is committed to maintaining a work environment that supports the dignity of all individuals. No person working at CP may be subjected to any form of discrimination or harassment, including sexual harassment. 10.2.2 Acts or threats of violence are unacceptable at all times on CP Property. Uttering of threats or committing acts of violence will result in the removal of the responsible Contractor Personnel from CP Property, termination of the Contract, and/or criminal charges. 10.2.3 Horseplay, practical jokes, fighting or any other activity that may create a safety hazard is not permitted. 10.3 Electronic Entertainment and Communication Devices 10.3.1 The use of personal entertainment devices, including portable audio and video devices such as compact DVD, CD, video game players, tablets, SMART watches and MP3 players, is prohibited: (a) while Working on CP Property; (b) while transporting CP Personnel, whether on and off CP Property; and (c) while operating any CP highway vehicle, railroad equipment or mobile equipment, whether on and off CP Property. 10.3.2 The use of electronic communication devices, including cell phones, Smart Phones, Blackberries, walkie-talkies, PDAs, iPads, Tablets, GPS navigation units, portable computers, and similar devices, is prohibited: (a) while operating any highway vehicle, unless it is stopped and parked in a safe location; (b) while transporting CP Personnel, whether on and off CP Property; (c) while operating or assisting in the operation of any railroad equipment or mobile equipment; (d) while operating power tools, equipment or machinery; (e) when Foul of Track for any reason; (f) wherever use is prohibited by signage or by a CP manager; or (g) whenever use of such a device creates an unsafe condition. 10.3.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, company cell phones, radios, walkie-talkies, GPS units, iPads, tablets and other communication devices may be used solely for the conduct of business when authorized by the CP Manager-in-Charge and where not prohibited by state or municipal legislation. Any electronic communication device may be used when it is necessary to communicate an emergency condition. 10.4 Smoking 10.4.1 Smoking, including the use of e-cigarettes is prohibited on all CP Property, and in or on all highway vehicles, Railroad Equipment, and Mobile Equipment, except for CP designated outdoor smoking areas. 12 11 Personal Protection 11.1 Work Clothing 11.1.1 The Contractor must ensure that Contractor Personnel wear clothing that meets applicable legislation and is suitable to perform the work safely. This includes at minimum ankle length pants and waist length shirts with a minimum quarter-length sleeves at all times. Clothing must not interfere with vision, hearing or use of hands and feet. 11.2 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 11.2.1 The Contractor shall ensure that Contractor Personnel wear personal protective equipment required by applicable legislation, regulations, codes and industry standards as necessary to protect against personal injuries while on railroad property. All personal protective equipment shall meet applicable legislation and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards and shall be in good condition and be properly fitted. 11.2.2 The following mandatory personal protective equipment (“PPE”) shall be supplied by the Contractor at its own expense, and shall be worn at all times by Contractor Personnel while on CP Property: (a) safety hard hat, meeting ANSI 89.1 standards, except in office buildings or in enclosed vehicles or equipment; (b) safety footwear with protective toe caps and puncture resistant soles, meeting ASTM F2413 standards. (c) safety glasses with permanently attached side shields meeting ANSI Z87.1 standards in office buildings or enclosed highway vehicles. Note- transition lenses are not permitted; (d) high visibility fluorescent outerwear with retro reflective striping meeting ANSI 107 Class 2 standards not covered by other clothing or equipment, except where necessary for safety reasons such as where fall protection or pole climbing equipment is being used; and (e) any other PPE as required by applicable legislation or referenced standard, or as otherwise required to protect Contractor Personnel from injuries. Type of Protection Additional Recommendations Hard Hats Have hi-visibility characteristics which are not obscured by markings or decals Safety Eyewear Tinted safety eyewear must meet military standards for red signal recognition if operating railroad equipment (safety eyewear meeting this requirement is available from ORR Safety; ask for CP approved tinted safety eyewear) Transition lenses are discouraged and should be worn with caution when working in changing light conditions Personal sunglasses are discouraged and must not be worn when operating Railway Equipment Wear mesh face shields over top safety glasses when using any striking tool while performing on track maintenance work (e.g. spiking, snapping on/off anchors, etc.). If working alongside CP employees you will be required to comply with this practice. Safety Footwear Have defined heels Be laced and tied securely for ankle support When snow and ice conditions are present wear anti-slip winter footwear High-Visibility Apparel Lime-green is recommended when working on, or near tracks, or when performing Co-mingled Work 13 11.2.3 Contractor and Contractor Personnel shall be solely and fully responsible for assessing the risks related to the work and determining whether additional PPE may be required such as: (a) Nomex or Proban fire-retardant protective gear when performing certain Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) work and/or handling certain Hazardous Materials, or performing specialized work. (b) hearing protection when working in any area where noise exposure levels: (i) are consistently equal to or greater 85 dBA; (ii) exceed 115 dBA at any time; and (iii) any other work areas where posted, or so notified by CP management. (c) respiratory protection where Contractor Personnel may be exposed to occupational dusts/particulates, fumes, mists, gases and vapors, in which case, in which case Contractors must have a written Respiratory Protection Program that meets or exceeds applicable legislation; (d) additional eye and face protection meeting ANSI standard Z87.1 (i.e. face shields, impact/splash goggles, welding/cutting goggles and welding helmets); and (e) fall protection systems and equipment meeting appropriate ANSI Z359 standards as required by applicable legislation and as appropriate for the related fall hazards. (f) fall protection when working on an unguarded surface over water, where the water is deeper than 4 feet, or where there is a hazard of drowning due to terrain, winter conditions, water velocity or current; contractors must use a fall protection system or a personal floatation device (PFD) meeting approved standards. 12 Railroad Track Protection 12.1 Contractor’s Responsibilities for the Protection of Railroad Traffic and Property 12.1.1 Where the Work Site is in close proximity to, or is located on, above, or below railroad tracks, special attention, care and precautions shall be taken to ensure the safety of all Contractor Personnel, CP Personnel, all other third parties and to protect CP’s property and railroad operations. 12.1.2 Contractor shall ensure that Contractor Personnel is made aware of all unique and inherent hazards in working near, on, above or below railroad tracks and shall ensure that all Contractor Personnel are fully trained and equipped to work safely. 12.1.3 Contractors who perform inspection, maintenance or repair to railroad tracks or track structures must be trained in accordance with FRA On Track Safety Rules (FRA 49 CFR Part 214, Subpart C - Roadway Worker Protection Regulations). 12.1.4 Contractors will not be allowed to foul a track unless: (a) They have been properly advised of the On Track Safety awareness procedures; (b) A railroad employee who is qualified to provide protection is present at the work site, or. (c) The Contractor has personnel present who are specifically trained, qualified and authorized to provide that protection. 12.1.5 All work shall be organized or executed in such a manner as to ensure no interference with the regularity and safety of railroad operations. No step or sequence of any Work that might directly 14 or indirectly affect the safe movement of railroad traffic shall be started without the approval of the Manager-in-Charge. 12.1.6 No temporary structure, materials, or equipment shall be permitted closer than 12 feet to the nearest rail of any track without prior approval in writing of the Manager-in-Charge. Contractor Personnel shall at all times remain alert to the movement of trains, rolling stock and other railroad equipment. 12.1.7 Contractor Personnel shall be especially alert in yards and terminal areas as (a) Railroad equipment that appears to be stationary may be moving; (b) the rate of movement of railroad equipment may be faster than it appears; (c) Railroad equipment change tracks often; and movements may be occurring simultaneously on adjacent tracks. 12.1.8 The Contractor shall, at all times, conduct its operations in a wholly responsible manner to avoid damage to the CP’s tracks or property. 12.2 50 feet Clearance Requirement 12.2.1 All work shall be performed as far away from railroad tracks as possible. 12.2.2 Unless authorized by CP, Contractor Personnel, equipment, and vehicles are not permitted to be within 50 feet of the closest track centerline. 12.2.3 In the event work must be carried out within 50 feet of the closest track written authorization must be obtained from the Manager-in-Charge, and Contractor Personnel must still remain at the maximum practicable distance from all railroad tracks at all times. 12.2.4 When crossing tracks, Contractor Personnel shall ensure a minimum of 50 feet separation between standing railroad equipment, stay at least 15 feet away from the end of the nearest equipment, and look both ways before crossing tracks, and if clear, walk at a right angle to the tracks. 12.2.5 No work activities or processes are allowed within 50 feet of the track while trains are passing through the work site unless specifically authorized. 12.3 Flagging Protection 12.3.1 When the Work requires Contractor Personnel to be within 50 feet of any railroad tracks, Contractor or Contractor Personnel shall notify and obtain the written approval of the Manager-in-Charge in advance of the intended start date, and when approved, shall only perform Work strictly in accordance with all terms and conditions of that approval. 12.3.2 Unless otherwise indicated by the Manager-in-Charge, proper protection against the movement of trains, rolling stock and other railroad equipment shall be deemed required at all times whenever Work or Contractor Personnel must be within 50 feet of the closet track. Protection may be provided only by a qualified CP employee through use of a flag person. 12.3.3 Where CP determines that flagging is required, then Work must be strictly conducted under the direction of a CP flag person or such other person designated by the Manager-in-Charge. 12.3.4 Contractor Personnel shall ensure that there is clear communication at all times between Contractor Personnel and any CP flag person. Contractor Personnel shall ensure that they are aware of: (a) flagging distance limits; (b) time limits; and (c) any adjacent tracks where movement of railroad equipment may still occur. 15 12.3.5 Contractor Personnel shall not assume that a train movement is being stopped or cleared unless clear communication is received directly from the CP flag person. 12.3.6 A job briefing between the CP flag person and all Contractor Personnel must occur before beginning any Work on or Foul of Track. 12.3.7 Blue signal protection is used to indicate that CP or Contractor Personnel are working on, under or between railroad equipment and movement of trains or other railroad equipment is prohibited. Blue signals must not be tampered with or obstructed. Blue signals can only be removed by the person or group of persons who originally applied it. Application, use, and removal of blue signals, when appropriate, may only be done under the authorization and guidance of the Manager-in-Charge. 12.3.8 Red flag protection is used to indicate that CP or Contractor Personnel are working on or foul of track, or the track is out of service and movement of trains or other railroad equipment is prohibited. Red flags must not be tampered with or obstructed. Application, use, and removal of red flags, when appropriate, may only be done under the authorization and guidance of the Manager-in- Charge. 12.4 Working on or near Tracks 12.4.1 When authorized to perform Work foul of track or otherwise be near railroad tracks, Contractor Personnel shall ensure all Contractor Personnel, equipment, and vehicles are kept as far away from railroad tracks as practicable, and shall at all times: (a) be alert to train movements and shall expect the movement of trains, engines, cars, or other mobile railroad equipment at any time, on any track, and in any direction, even if they appear to be stationary or in storage; (b) not rely on others to protect them from train movement; (c) stay at least 15 feet away from the ends of railroad equipment when crossing the track; (d) ensure a minimum of 50 feet separation prior to crossing between Railroad Equipment; (e) look both ways before crossing tracks, and if clear, walk at a right angle to them. (f) never climb on, under or between railroad equipment; (g) be aware of the location of structures or obstructions where track clearances are close; (h) not stand on the track in front of an approaching engine, car or other equipment; (i) stand at least 20 feet from the track(s) when there is a passing movement of trains, engines, cars, or other mobile railroad equipment, to prevent injury from flying debris or loose rigging and shall observe the train as it passes and be prepared to take evasive action in the event of an emergency; (j) not stand on or between adjacent tracks in multiple track territory when a train is passing; (k) not walk, stand or sit on the rails, between rails or on the end of ties, unless absolutely necessary. As the rail surface can be extremely slippery, personnel must step over the rails when crossing tracks. Personnel shall also be aware railroad ties can also be slippery and that railroad ballast can shift while walking on top of it. Situational awareness and use of proper footwear is important; (l) not remain in a vehicle that is within 50 feet of a passing train unless specifically authorized, or where this is not possible. (m) keep away from track switches as remotely operated switch points can move unexpectedly with enough force to crush ballast rock. Personnel shall stay away from any other railroad devices they are unsure of. Personnel shall not disturb or foul the ballast at any time. 16 (n) Third party work that has a potential to impact rail traffic must take into account machine swing radius, vertical grade differences, overhead work, etc to ensure it will not impact a passing train; work and equipment must maintain a distance of 50 feet of a passing train. (o) When exiting on track machinery as trains are passing; exit on the opposite side. (a) use 3-point contact when getting on/off any vehicle, equipment or track unit; (b) face the vehicle or equipment/track unit when getting on/off (c) place handheld items onto equipment/track unit or seek help prior to getting on/off (d) get on/off on the operators side when possible 12.5 Equipment on or near tracks 12.5.1 Contractor Personnel shall not be Foul of Track with any piece of equipment without a CP flag person or other authorized track protection; 12.5.2 Contractor Personnel shall not move equipment across the tracks except at established road crossings, or unless under the protection and authorization of a CP flag person and only if the Work Site has been properly prepared for such a move. Tracked equipment will require a CP flag person any time railroad tracks are crossed. 12.5.3 Contractor Personnel shall not move equipment across railroad bridges or through tunnels, except as expressly authorized and only under such conditions as stipulated by the Manager-in-Charge. 12.5.4 When there is passing rail traffic, Contractor Personnel shall move equipment away from the tracks at least 50 feet, or where not possible, park the equipment as far away from the tracks as possible, exit to the side away from the track where the movement is taking place, and walk to a safe a distance. 12.5.5 When there is passing rail traffic, buckets, shovels, and loads on cranes must be lowered to the ground to rest, and cranes without a load must have their load line tightened or retracted to prevent movement. 12.6 Railroad Signs, Signals, Flags and other Communication Infrastructure 12.6.1 Signs, signals and flags shall not be obstructed, removed, relocated, disabled or altered in any way without proper authorization and qualification. 12.6.2 Only qualified Contractor Personnel who are authorized by CP are permitted to operate switches, derails, electric track mechanisms, signal and communication systems or other track control appliances. 12.6.3 Railroad pole lines carry electric power and should be treated as any other power lines. 12.6.4 The Contractor shall keep all Contractor Personnel informed of current weather conditions. Personnel shall stay alert for possible high water conditions, or flash floods. During severe weather conditions: a) Personnel shall be prepared to take cover in the event of a tornado b) Personnel shall not work while lightning is occurring c) If storm conditions arise unexpectedly, Contractor Personnel shall ensure that equipment is in the clear of the tracks and secured before seeking cover. Contractor Personnel shall stay away from railroad tracks when visibility is poor, such as during fog or blizzard conditions. Any Contractor personnel discovering a hazardous or potentially unsafe condition, which may affect the safe passage of railroad traffic, must advise CP Police immediately by calling the CP Police Communications Centre – 1-800-716-9132 17 12.7 Excavation 12.7.1 Before starting excavation operations, the Contractor shall ascertain that there are no underground wires, fiber optic cables, pipelines or other utilities which could be damaged or, if present, that such installations are properly protected. Fiber optic cables are present on most segments of the right- of-way. Prior to commencing any excavation, the Contractor shall contact the proper authority CP and/or public utility to obtain the necessary permit and to locate and protect such cables or other underground utilities. 12.7.2 Excavations shall not be left unattended unless they are properly protected; and the Manager-in- Charge shall be notified. 12.7.3 Contractors MUST obtain and maintain utility locates in accordance with applicable law. 13 HAZCOM 13.1 General Requirements 13.1.1 If at any time Contractor’s Work involves the use, handling, storage, or disposal of Hazardous Materials (“Handling of Hazardous Materials”), Contractor Personnel must inform the Manager-in- Charge. 13.1.2 Contractors shall ensure that all Contractor Personnel are fully trained in the Handling of Hazardous Materials and that Contractor and Contractor Personnel are in full compliance with all Applicable Legislation, and as directed by the Manager-in-Charge. 13.1.3 Contractor Personnel shall have appropriate processes, systems and controls in place to prevent or otherwise mitigate potential environmental, health and safety risks associated with the Handling of Hazardous Materials. 13.2 Access to Safety Data Sheets (SDS) 13.2.1 Prior to beginning any Work that may expose CP Personnel to Hazardous Materials, Contractor or Contractor Personnel shall: (a) provide a copy of the respective SDS to the Manager-in-Charge; and (b) keep a copy of the SDS at the work site and ensure that it is readily available at all times. 13.3 Hazardous Material Incident or Spill 13.3.1 In the event of a hazardous material incident or spill, the Contractor must: (a) ensure that no Contractor or CP Personnel have or will be exposed; (b) take all reasonable actions to contain the spill; (c) respond in accordance with its emergency response plan; and (d) notify CP immediately in accordance with Section 18 below. 18 14 Operation of Highway Vehicles 14.1 Highway Vehicles 14.1.1 The following requirements apply to all highway vehicles, when operated on CP Property; or used to transport CP Personnel. 14.2 Regulations and Inspection 14.2.1 Before using a highway vehicle, Contractor Personnel shall: (a) complete a pre-trip inspection; (b) maintain an inspection log; (c) ensure periodic inspections are completed at official testing locations as required; (d) ensure the vehicle is maintained and in safe operating conditions at all times; and (e) ensure the vehicle is in compliance with applicable motor vehicle regulations and license requirements. 14.2.2 Vehicle maintenance, inspection records and logs must be made available to the Manager-in- Charge on request. 14.3 Vehicle Operator Requirements 14.3.1 Operation of highway vehicles is restricted to those Contractor Personnel who are licensed, qualified and authorized to do so. Such Contractor Personnel shall be responsible for the safety of all passengers at all times. For greater certainty, such Contractor Personnel shall: (a) hold a valid license for the class of vehicle being operated, in accordance with applicable local, state and federal requirements, and (b) strictly comply with all posted traffic signs, signals, and all shall obey all applicable legislation; and (c) maintain the required driver log, and make the log available to the Manager-in-Charge on request, and (d) comply with the requirements on the use of electronic devices as set out in Section 10 above. 14.4 Driving on CP Property 14.4.1 In addition to the requirements set out above, while on CP Property, Contractor Personnel shall: (a) travel only on designated roadways unless otherwise instructed; (b) keep daytime running lights on (if so equipped); (c) not exceed 15 mph unless otherwise posted; (d) come to a full stop at all blind corners, rail and roadway crossings; (e) yield the right of way to all Mobile Equipment and other non-highway equipment or service vehicles; (f) not operate vehicles (or any internal combustion equipment) inside buildings or enclosed structures unless adequate ventilation is provided; (g) not park Foul of Track unless on-track protection is provided; (h) not leave vehicles running unnecessarily; 19 (i) park only in pre-determined or designated areas; (j) always use the parking brake (or wheel chocks) when leaving an unoccupied vehicle running; and (k) prior to operation of a vehicle the driver must conduct a walk around of the vehicle to identify any obstacles, clearance restrictions, or adjacent vehicles that may interfere with executing a safe movement. (l) where safe and practicable, pull vehicles through or back into marked parking spaces to avoid reverse collisions when exiting. (m) If a passenger is present, he exit the vehicle prior to a reverse movement to provide guidance and direction to the driver during the reverse movement and applies to commercial vehicles and vehicles with restricted rear views 14.4.2 All Contractor Personnel who will be operating a highway vehicle or Mobile Equipment in any CP intermodal facilities must complete a Driver Safety Orientation program prior to first entry, and from time to time thereafter as directed by the Manager-in-Charge. 14.5 Seat Belts 14.5.1 Seat belts must always be worn while operating or riding in any equipped vehicle unless Contractor personnel is actively engaged in inspections requiring said Contractor Personnel to be free of such restraint, and then only when the vehicle is operating at less than 15 mph. 14.6 Loads 14.6.1 Contractor Personnel shall ensure vehicles are loaded according to weight and dimensional requirements as authorized by state regulations and permits, and properly load and secure tools, material, equipment and freight to avoid shifting, falling, leaking or otherwise escaping from vehicles during operation. 14.7 Riding in CP Vehicles 14.7.1 Contractor Personnel are prohibited from operating or riding in any CP vehicles unless authorized to do so, or in case of emergency. 15 Tools, Equipment and Machinery 15.1 General Safety Requirements Respecting All Tools, Equipment and Machinery 15.1.1 Contractor Personnel shall ensure that all tools, equipment, and machinery used be: (a) in compliance with all Applicable Legislation; (b) in good working order, properly serviced and maintained; (c) safe for their proposed use and used only for purposes specified by the manufacturer; (d) operated and maintained only by persons properly trained and qualified for that duty; (e) seat belts (if present on equipment) must be worn while operating or riding any such equipped mobile equipment; (f) if mobile, equipped with appropriate safety devices (e.g. lights, horns, back-up alarms, safety beacons); and prevented from moving, through use of the hand brake, wheel blocking, wheel chocking and/or a derail, where applicable. 15.1.2 The Contractor shall provide adequate lighting when performing work between sunset and sunrise. 20 15.1.3 Use of CP tools, equipment and machinery by Contractor Personnel is prohibited unless specifically authorized by local CP management. 15.2 Hazardous Energy Control- Lockout 15.2.1 Contractor Personnel shall employ lockout/tagout procedures as required to eliminate the accidental or unexpected start-up, energizing, or release of stored (residual) energy during maintenance, repair and/or servicing activities. 15.2.2 All tools, equipment and machinery must be made safe and isolated from all energy sources rendering the machine, equipment, or process inoperative prior to performing maintenance, repair or servicing related tasks. 15.2.3 No Contractor Personnel can remove any CP applied lock or tag, including bad-order tag. 15.2.4 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Contractor’s Work may create an energy hazard to any CP Personnel, then all affected parties must follow the requirements set forth in CP’s Lockout – Hazardous Energy Control Policy and Code of Practice. 15.2.5 If CP Personnel and Contractors are jointly performing maintenance, repair or servicing activities on the same machine, equipment or using the same energy source, then a multi-lock hasp must be applied with individual locks and tags affixed (as per CP’s Lockout – Hazardous Energy Control Policy and Code of Practice). 15.3 Electrical Safety Requirements 15.3.1 In addition to the hazardous energy control lockout requirements above, all electrical Work must comply with Applicable Legislation, National Electrical Code (NEC), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) requirements. 15.3.2 Contractor Personnel Working on electrical systems must: (a) if in proximity to CP Personnel, inform them of: (i) existing or potential electrical hazards; (ii) any specific additional personal protective equipment that may be required; (iii) applicable safe work practices; (iv) applicable emergency and evacuation procedures; and (v) apply lock out procedures as per section above on Hazardous Energy Control- Lockout (b) have practices, procedures and training that comply with: (i) Applicable sections of the NEC and NFPA electrical safety standards; (ii) Any other Applicable Legislation; and (c) not operate or allow cranes or other mobile equipment to approach closer to any live electrical power line than is permitted by OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1910.333). 15.4 Lifting Devices 15.4.1 All lifting devices, including but not limited to jacks, cranes, cables, slings, chains and hooks shall: (a) meet Applicable Legislation governing design, inspection, maintenance and operation; (b) be safety certified and labeled or tagged with load capacity limits where required; 21 (c) have sufficient capacity for the planned lift; (d) have sufficient footing or support area to properly distribute the load during a lift. 15.5 Welding and Torch Cutting 15.5.1 When welding or torch cutting, Contractor Personnel shall: (a) be properly trained and qualified; (b) ensure that all closed containers have been properly purged; (c) direct flame or sparks away from other Workers, equipment and flammable material; (d) have a fire extinguisher readily available; (e) keep compressed gas and oxygen cylinders stored in a secure, vertical position, with regulators removed and caps applied, labeled properly and located in vented cabinets or other designated locations. 15.6 Explosive Actuated Tools 15.6.1 Only Contractor Personnel who are qualified and licensed in accordance with Applicable Legislation, and authorized by CP, may use explosives or explosive actuated tools. 15.7 Unattended Equipment or Machinery 15.7.1 Tools, Equipment and Machinery shall not be left unattended at any time and shall not be stored on CP Property, unless expressly permitted pursuant to a written agreement with CP or by the Manager-in-Charge in writing, and where so permitted, Contractor shall ensure that: (a) storage shall be restricted to the designated area, or as otherwise specified by CP. (b) all such tools, equipment and machinery shall be secured in a safe position well clear of all tracks to prevent accidental contact with trains and moving equipment and to not restrict train crew sightlines; (c) as much as possible, tools, equipment and machinery shall be stored in locations out of public view. (d) Machines must be secured in accordance with on-track machinery rules. 16 Emergency Response 16.1 Emergency Response Plan 16.1.1 The Contractor must maintain a current emergency response plan and make it available to CP on request. Emergency response plans must include at a minimum: (a) contractor reporting procedures in the event of an incident or spill; (b) emergency response contacts and phone numbers, including phone numbers for CP incident reporting and local CP managers (See Attachment A); and (c) containment measures to be taken in the event of an incident or spill. 22 16.2 Initial Response 16.2.1 Initial response to any emergency condition must follow the following sequence: (a) Protect the safety and security of all individuals and communities (b) Provide environmental protection and mitigation (c) Conduct incident investigation and evidence preservation (d) Restore railroad operations 16.3 First Aid 16.3.1 Contractor Personnel must have sufficient First Aid qualified personnel and the required First Aid kit and any other required First Aid equipment at the Work Site, suitable for the crew size, nature of Work being performed and location, all of which shall, at a minimum, comply with OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1910.266). 16.4 Fire Protection 16.4.1 The Contractor must have appropriate fire extinguishers suitable (i.e., type, size and quantity) for nature of the work being done, in compliance with applicable legislation, and be readily available at all times on: (a) the work site; and (b) all Contractor equipment, machinery and highway vehicles. 16.4.2 Contractor Personnel shall ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to prevent fires, including the following: (a) storing flammable material (e.g., paper, rubbish, sawdust, oily or greasy rags, etc.) in proper containers; (b) storing and transporting fuel, gasoline or other flammable liquids in approved containers. Use of unapproved containers is prohibited; (c) proper disposal of flammable material daily; (d) preventing static electricity when dispensing or transferring flammable liquids by using proper grounding and bonding techniques; (e) avoid using cutting or welding torches during the last one-half hour of shifts, if possible; (f) taking special precautions with fusees, including: (i) store and transport in approved containers; (ii) do not allow fusees to come in contact with any combustible material, including railroad ties or wooden timbers; and (iii) fully extinguish fusees before leaving the location where used; (g) promptly advise CP management of any fire on CP Property; and (h) fully extinguish or provide protection for any fire prior to leaving the Work Site. 16.4.3 Contractors Working on the CP right-of-way where a high risk of fire exists (e.g., during rail grinding, rail welding) must have: 23 (a) appropriate fire prevention and suppression plans (including emergency numbers for CP, local firefighters and fire control districts); and (b) additional firefighting equipment and trained Contractor Personnel on site, as required by Applicable Legislation or the Manage In Charge. 17 Confined Space 17.1 Confined Space 17.1.1 Qualified and authorized Contractor Personnel must follow all required confined space entry procedures in accordance with applicable legislation and standards prior to entering into a confined space. 17.1.2 Rescue procedures and equipment must readily available when required to enter a confined space. 18 Reportable Accidents, Incidents and Injuries 18.1 Reportable Injuries 18.1.1 Reportable injuries include any personal injury to: (a) Contractor Personnel; (b) any CP Personnel; or (c) to any third party on CP Property. 18.2 Reportable Accidents 18.2.1 Reportable accidents include any occurrence that results in: (a) damage to railroad tracks, right of way, buildings or other CP Property; (b) damage to railroad equipment; (c) damage to CP highway vehicles; (d) release of hazardous material; (e) spill or loss of transported commodities; and (f) any threat to the environment. 18.3 Reportable Incidents 18.3.1 Reportable incidents include: (a) unintended movement of railroad equipment; (b) failure to provide track protection for Workers when required; (c) movement of railroad equipment beyond authorized limits; (d) operation of railroad equipment by an unqualified person; (e) unauthorized handling of a track switch; (f) damage, vandalism or tampering with any railroad signals, structures or railroad safety device; 24 (g) seepage, leakage, spills of, or other contamination from, Hazardous Materials; (h) actual, threaten or suspected security related incidents; (i) slides, washouts or other on-track obstructions; or (j) any occurrence that may disrupt the movement of trains or affect safe rail operations. 19 Reporting 19.1 Emergency Reporting 19.1.1 In the case of an emergency, Contractor Personnel must call: (a) 911, where this emergency response system exists, or (b) the local police, fire or emergency department in all cases; and (c) CP Police Services Communication Center- 1-800-716-9132. 19.2 Accident, Incident, Injury Reporting 19.2.1 When an accident, incident or injury occurs on CP Property, the Contractor must: (a) immediately report it to the (i) CP Police Services Communication Center 1-800-716-9132; and (ii) CP Manager-in-Charge (b) follow all instructions given to protect the scene. 19.2.2 CP is obligated to report Contractor Personnel injuries occurring on CP property to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Any state or required regulatory reporting remains the Contractor’s responsibility. 19.3 Information to Report 19.3.1 Information required with the initial report includes: (a) type of incident; (b) date and time of occurrence; (c) location (mileage, subdivision, building, yard or other physical description); (d) identity of person(s) involved or injured (company & name); (e) description of any hazardous materials involved; (f) type & unit number of any railroad equipment or vehicle involved; (g) description of occurrence, damage and/or injury, and cause if known; (h) description of any emergency response; (i) name and contact information of person making the report; and (j) any such other information that CP may require. 19.4 Environmental Incidents and Spills 19.4.1 In the event of an environmental incident or spill that could have a negative impact on the environment, the Contractor must immediately: (a) report the incident to the Operations Center, the Manager-in-Charge, and the designated CP Contact as per the governing agreement relating to the Work; (b) take all reasonable actions to contain the spill; (c) respond in accordance with its emergency response plan; and 25 (d) provide CP with the following information; (i) description of location and surrounding area, including any sensitive environmental areas nearby (e.g., rivers, parks, sewers); (ii) type and quantity of substance released; (iii) cause of spill or deposit, if known; and (iv) details of any immediate action taken or action proposed to be taken to contain spill and recover substance. 19.5 Additional Contractor Requirements 19.5.1 Contractor and Contractor Personnel must: (a) ensure an appropriate emergency response is initiated; (b) protect any evidence until released by the CP Manager-in-Charge; (c) cooperate fully with any CP investigation; (d) cooperate fully with any investigating government agency; and (e) notify CP if information is requested by any investigating government agency. 20 Contractor & Contractor Personnel Acknowledgement Acknowledgement 20.1.1 Contractor and Contractor Personnel who Work on CP Property shall be deemed to have read and understood the content of these Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors While Working on CP Property in the United States, as amended from time to time, and to agree to be bound by them. 20.1.2 These Minimum Safety Requirements for Contractors While Working on CP Property in the United States are subject to change without prior notice. The most current version of these Minimum Safety Requirements can be viewed at www.cpr.ca or by contacting the Manager-in-Charge. Home SafeTM is a commitment to be vigilant about personal safety and the safety of co-workers. 26 NOTES: 27 21 Attachment A – Emergency Information Sheet EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION EMERGENCY CONTACTS PHONE LOCATION CP Minneapolis Operations Center 1-800-766-4357 . CP Police Services 1-800-716-9132 CP Railroad Traffic Controller Radio Channel Manager-in-Charge Local Police Services Local Fire Services: Local EMS Hospital Physician Aircraft Service, (if applicable): Watercraft Service, (if applicable): Other Emergency Services Emergency Evacuation Route (Describe nearest evacuation assembly location OR Provide sketch on back) 28 WORK SITE INFORMATION PHONE LOCATION Work Site Location Name Railroad Subdivision & Mileage Address, Number and Street Nearest Town CP Manager-in-Charge Emergency Site Access Route (Describe route from nearest emergency services location in detail including access roads & physical landmarks OR provide sketch on back.) Contractor Supervisor Site Telephone Certified First Aid Attendant Location of First Aid Supplies at Site Location of Fire Extinguishing Equipment: Location of WHIMS data sheets UTILITY INFORMATION UTILITIES CONTACT PHONE LOCATION Natural Gas: ( ) Electrical: ( ) Fiber Optic Line: ( ) Water & Sewer: ( ) Telephone: ( ) Cable System: ( ) Qualified employee(s) in: ( ) Confined Space Entry, (if applicable): ( ) Equipment requirements for Confined Space Entry, (if applicable): ( ) Other: City of Edina v 01.10 Page 1 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee RIGHT OF ENTRY LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made by and between Soo Line Railroad Company doing business as Canadian Pacific and ________City of Edina_________________. 1. PARTIES SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation doing business as Canadian Pacific with general offices at: Address Contact Info Canadian Pacific Plaza 120 South 6th St. – Suite 700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Name: Brian Osborne Phone: (612) 330-4555 Fax: Email: Brian_Osborne@cpr.ca hereinafter called “CP,” and ____City of Edina_______________, a whose address is: Address Contact Info 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Name: Chad Millner Phone: 952.826.0318 Fax: Mobile: Email: cmillner@edinamn.gov hereinafter called “Licensee.” 2. PROPERTY; SCHEDULE; GRANT OF LICENSE 2.1 Property CP hereby grants Licensee a license to enter in and upon certain property owned or controlled by CP in Edina, MN near railroad mile post 17.85 +/- on the MN&S Subdivision, as shown upon the map labeled Exhibit A that is attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “Property”) 2.2 Work Schedule for the sole for the purpose of performing, generally, the following activities: Installing a bituminous shared use path supported by a retaining wall (the “Work”), as detailed in Licensee’s plans, specifications and special provisions. The Work is subject to approval by CP’s authorized representative. 2.3 Grant of License This license is granted subject to all the terms and conditions set forth below and applies to all Work and activities upon the Property that may be performed by Licensee through its employees, agents, and contractors. For the purposes of this Agreement, the actions and omissions of such employees, agents, and contractors shall be deemed the actions and omissions of Licensee. 2.4 Agreement to be Available at Work Site Licensee shall keep a copy of this Agreement at the Work site and shall make it available upon demand by any employee or agent of CP. City of Edina v 01.10 Page 2 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee 3. TERM, EFFECTIVE DATE, EXPIRATION & TERMINATION 3.1 Term The term of this Agreement shall Commence at 12:01 am on Oct 6, 2022 (the “Commencement Date”); and Expire at 11:59 pm on July 1, 2023 (the “Expiration Date”) the “Term.” Upon agreement between CP and Licensee, the Term may be lengthened or shortened without affecting any other provisions of this Agreement. 3.2 Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective upon the date that it has been signed by both parties. 3.3 Expiration This Agreement will expire at the Expiration Date, or when the Work is completed, whichever occurs first. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the preceding sentence shall not terminate or limit any claim by CP against Licensee arising prior to the Expiration Date. If the Work includes monitoring wells, and if such wells remain on the Property after the Expiration Date, this Agreement shall remain in effect for those wells until the earlier of the following: (i) the date they are properly closed (i.e., sealed and abandoned in accordance with applicable legal requirements) by Licensee or (ii) the date CP assumes ownership of such wells pursuant to section 10.8. 3.4 TERMINATION; EXCLUSION NOTHWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED HEREIN, this Agreement is terminable by CP prior to the Expiration Date in the event Licensee breaches any of its obligations under this Agreement. The early termination of this Agreement shall not terminate or limit any claim by CP against Licensee arising prior to such termination. If Licensee is in breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement, any employee or agent of CP may order Licensee off the Property, in which case Licensee shall immediately leave the Property; moreover, Licensee shall leave the property immediately upon termination pursuant to this paragraph. 4. PAYMENTS 4.1 License Fee In consideration of the permissions herein granted, Licensee shall with its execution hereof pay to CP the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00). 4.2 Utilities Licensee shall assume and timely pay for any gas, electrical, telephone, computer, sewer, water, storm water, waste or trash removal or any other service or commodity connected with the Work, collectively “Utility Service.” If any Utility Service fee is in common with CP or other parties, Licensee shall be liable for its proportionate share of any such Utility Service Fee and upon receipt of a bill therefor, promptly pay CP or such other party for its share. It shall be a default of the terms of this license if it can be shown that Licensee has not made such payments within 30 days if due to CP, or within 60 days if payable to any other party. 4.3 Mechanics' And Materialmen's Liens City of Edina v 01.10 Page 3 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee If any mechanics' or materialmen's lien, or similar lien, is asserted against the Property, or any other property of CP, as a consequence of the Work, Licensee shall immediately satisfy, defend, or obtain the release of such lien, all at Licensee's expense, and Licensee shall indemnify and defend CP against any Claims arising out of or connected with such lien. 4.4 Additional Charges Licensee shall within 30 days of receipt of a bill therefor, pay to CP costs for flagging, track changes or damage, or other such charges as may be provided by this Agreement or that CP may reasonably impose in connection with Licensee’s Work. 4.5 Due Dates; Penalties; Other Charges 4.3.1 Due Dates Any item, submission or payment required to be made shall be deemed timely made if received by the other party on or before the specified due date, or prior to expiration of the applicable period for compliance, submission or payment. 4.3.2 Late Fees In addition to any amounts payable by Licensee to CP, Licensee shall pay CP a late fee for any payment not timely made by Licensee. The late fee shall be at the rate for overdue accounts set by CP’s Accounting Department that is in effect at the time that that any such payment is due. Said late fee shall initially be an amount equal to 1% of the invoice amount per month. 4.3.3 Fines and Service Fees In addition to any other amounts payable by Licensee to CP, Licensee shall pay CP for any bank fines or service incurred by it in connection with the handling, non-payment, return or currency conversion incurred by CP in connection with processing of any payment made by Licensee to CP. 4.6 Work At No Cost To CP The Work completed by Licensee shall be performed at no cost to CP. 5. CONTACT, NOTICES, ETC. 5.1 Contact Persons; Communications Communications pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed to the contact persons designated in Section 1 or their designees. Either party may change its contact person, or the address(es), telephone number, or fax number for the contact person, by notice to the other party. 5.2 Notices Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective upon delivery to the address or fax number of the contact person for the party to whom notice is being given. If notice is given by fax, the notice shall not be deemed effective until received in legible form. 5.3 Notification Prior To Beginning Work Licensee must notify CP's contact person by telephone at least three working days prior to beginning any separate phase of the Work, and again promptly after such phase of the Work has been completed. 6. PERMITTED & PROHIBITED USES; RIGHTS OF CP 6.1 Permitted Uses 6.1.1 The Work City of Edina v 01.10 Page 4 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee The use of Property by Licensee shall be limited to the completion of the Work set forth in Section 2.2., or such other activities as may be approved by CP in writing. 6.1.2 Government Authorities Licensee may permit governmental authorities other than Licensee with jurisdiction over the Work to enter the Property for the purpose of inspecting or monitoring the Work. Whenever possible, Licensee shall advise CP (by telephone or other means calculated to bring the matter to CP's immediate attention) prior to permitting such governmental authorities to enter the Property for such purposes. The actions and omissions of such governmental authorities while on the Property for such inspections and monitoring shall be deemed the actions and omissions of Licensee. Licensee is not authorized to permit governmental authorities other than Licensee to enter the Property for any other purpose. 6.2 Prohibited Uses and Activities Licensee shall not use, occupy or permit the Property to be used for any purpose, activity or improvement except as provided in this Agreement or as may be approved of in writing by CP. Specifically, Licensee shall not: 6.2.1 Advertising permit any advertisements or signs upon the Property; 6.2.2 Use of Hazardous Substances without prior written disclosure to and approval by CP, Use or authorize the Use of any Hazardous Substance on the Property, including installation of any above or underground storage tanks; subject thereto, Licensee shall arrange at its own cost for the lawful transportation and off-site disposal of any and all Hazardous Substances that it shall Use or generate; 6.2.3 Use of Premises for waste treatment or as storage or disposal facility cause or allow the Property or any of CP's adjacent property to become a hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility within the meaning of, or to otherwise bring any such property within the ambit of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. or any similar state statute or local ordinance; or 6.2.4 Subleasing is prohibited sublease the Property or the permissions or rights herein granted in any manner or form. 6.3 Reservations and Rights of CP 6.3.1 Railroad Activities Take Priority over Work All Work by Licensee shall always and all times be subordinate to the needs of CP in connection with the operation and movement of railroad trains and equipment, and the repair of railroad track, structures, communications and appurtenances thereto. 6.3.2 Reservation of prior and future uses not inconsistent with Licensee’s activities The rights herein granted to Licensee are subject to the rights granted in all other licenses, permits and easements for tracks, roads, walkways, poles, wires, pipelines, sewers, billboards and other improvements that exist or may be placed upon, across, above or underneath the Property by CP, or its employees, agents, licensees, grantees, representatives or invitees. Further, CP reserves unto itself the right to place (or to give others the right to place) additional tracks, roads, walkways, poles, wires, pipelines, sewers and billboards upon, across, above or underneath the Property in any manner that does not unreasonably interfere with Licensee’s Work. 6.3.3 Monitoring CP may elect to be present during the conduct of the Work and to monitor same. City of Edina v 01.10 Page 5 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee 7. COVENANTS, CONDUCT & RESPONSIBILITIES 7.1 Definitions 7.1.1 "Claim” or "Claims” means any and all liabilities, suits, claims, counterclaims, causes of action, demands, penalties, debts, obligations, promises, acts, fines, judgments, damages, consequential damages, losses, costs, and expenses of every kind (including without limitation any attorney’s fees, consultants’ fees, response costs, remedial action costs, cleanup costs and expenses which may be related to any Claims); 7.1.2 "Environmental Law” or "Environmental Laws” means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq., the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq., the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. '§1321 et seq., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., all as amended from time to time, and any other federal, state, local or other governmental statute, regulation, rule, law, ordinance, order or decree dealing with the protection of human health, safety, natural resources or the environment now existing or hereafter enacted; 7.1.3 "Hazardous Substance” or "Hazardous Substances” means any pollutant, contaminant, hazardous substance or waste, solid waste, petroleum product, distillate, or fraction, radioactive material, chemical known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity, polychlorinated biphenyl or any other chemical, substance or material listed or identified in or regulated by any Environmental Law; 7.1.4 "Release” or "Released” means any actual or threatened spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, disposing or spreading of any Hazardous Substance into the environment, as "environment” is defined in CERCLA; 7.1.5 “Response” or "Respond” means action taken in compliance with Environmental Laws to correct, remove, remediate, cleanup, prevent, mitigate, monitor, evaluate, investigate, assess or abate the Release of a Hazardous Substance; 7.1.6 "Use” means to manage, generate, manufacture, process, treat, store, use, re-use, refine, recycle, reclaim, blend or burn for energy recovery, incinerate, accumulate speculatively, transport, transfer, dispose of, or abandon. 7.2 Investigation; Compliance with Laws; Safety Requirements 7.2.1 Tenants and Licensees in possession of Property Before entering the Property, Licensee shall secure the consent of all persons or entities who are using or occupying any portion of the Property. CP will cooperate with Licensee to obtain consent from any such person or entity who unreasonably withholds consent. 7.2.2 Underground Utilities and Structures a. Licensee shall be responsible for determining the location of all underground utilities (electric lines, telephone lines, gas lines, steam lines, sewer lines, water lines, fiber optic cables, pipes, wires, and the like) and underground structures. b. Licensee shall call CPCBYD “Canadian Pacific Call before You Dig” at 1-866- 291-0741 for Signal, Fiber Optics, and Power for CP Facilities on Canadian City of Edina v 01.10 Page 6 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee Pacific Right of Way and the STATE “ONE CALL” a minimum of 5 business prior to commencing any excavation or boring on the Property. c. CP will cooperate with Licensee to identify the location of underground utilities and structures known to CP, but such cooperation shall not relieve Licensee from its primary responsibility to determine the locations of such utilities and structures. 7.2.3 Permits And Licenses; Compliance With Laws Licensee shall secure, at no expense to CP, any permits or licenses required in connection with the Work and shall comply with all laws applicable to the Work and the Property, including (but not limited to) any laws, standards, regulations, and permit requirements relating to environmental pollution or contamination or to occupational health and safety. Licensee shall indemnify and defend CP against any and all Claims arising out of or connected with the violation of any law by Licensee while on or about the Property. 7.2.4 Compliance with CP Safety Requirements; Identification a. While on the Property, Licensee shall comply with the safety requirements of CP, as such requirements may be amended from time to time during the duration of the Work, all at no expense to CP. CP's safety requirements are set forth “Exhibit B” titled “MINIMUM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTORS WORKING ON RAILWAY PROPERTY” and in CP’s current safety handbook. One free copy of the current safety handbook will be provided to Licensee by the CP contact person. Additional copies will be provided at Licensee's expense. Licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that any person performing any of the Work for or on behalf of Licensee shall comply with the CP safety requirements that would apply to a CP employee performing similar work. b. Prior to any entry onto the Property, Licensee and every employee, agent or subcontractor who carries out any part of the Work on the Property shall successfully complete the safety training available through the e-railsafe program at www.e- railsafe.com in respect to requirements for Canadian Pacific operations. <if applicable> c. Licensee and every employee, agent or subcontractor who carries out any part of the Work on the Property shall at all times wear and visibly display the identification badge issued to them following successful completion of the e-railsafe safety training together with whatever additional identification materials that CP may reasonable require. 7.3 Work In Close Proximity To Railroad Operations; Drainage 7.3.1 Interference with Railroad Operations Licensee shall keep CP fully apprised of its proposed activities on the Property so as to prevent any interference with the operations of CP's trains or equipment (or trains or equipment of others) operating on or near the Property. 7.3.2 Clearance No work shall be done or any equipment or other obstruction placed over or within 25 feet laterally of the centerline of any track without advance notification to CP prior to performing such work or placing such equipment or obstruction. 7.3.3 Flagging City of Edina v 01.10 Page 7 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee Licensee must make arrangements with CP for such flagging or watchman service as CP deems necessary for the protection of railroad traffic. All such flagging and watchman service shall be provided by CP at Licensee’s expense. The fact that CP provides such service shall not relieve Licensee from any liability under this Agreement. CP's labor and material additives are subject to change without notice to Licensee, and CP shall be reimbursed based upon its labor and material additives actually in effect as of the date of such service. 7.3.4 Certain Work Close To Track Not Permitted; Lateral Support a. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by CP, excavations, borings, wells, pits, test holes, probe sites, and the like shall not be located closer than 25 feet from the centerline of the nearest railroad track on or adjacent to the Property nor shall it take or allow any action upon the Property that would materially impair the lateral or subadjacent support of adjacent lands or railroad tracks.; b. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by CP, drilling and excavating equipment and related equipment shall not be located closer than 25 feet from the nearest rail of any such track; c. In the event that CP permits excavations, borings, wells, pits, test holes, probe sites, or the like in close proximity to tracks, embankments or other features providing lateral or subadjacent support to land or tracks, then notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this license, Licensee shall be responsible for designing and constructing at no cost to CP any measure that is required to prevent the collapse, erosion or impairment to said land or tracks. 7.3.5 Storm Water Licensee shall not, without the advance written approval of CP, make any changes to the Property that would either increase the historic flow rate of storm water from the Property or create an impediment to the historic flow of storm water to the Property. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, as between CP and Licensee it is understood and agreed that Licensee shall, at Licensee’s cost and expense, be responsible for the construction, maintenance, repair and replacement upon the real property or other land not belonging to CP such storm sewer lines, manholes, mains, rip rap, boulders, wing walls, ditches and related to improvements required for Licensee's compliance with this section. 7.3.6. Fencing <If applicable> Licensee shall, at no cost to CP, construct and maintain during the term hereof a fence acceptable to CP in the location(s) designated on Exhibit A. Following completion of the Work, the Licensee shall remove the fencing, remove any post footings or concrete, and fill and tamp any post holes with clean fill material. 7.4 Conduct 7.4.1 Property clean, safe and free from nuisances Licensee shall not permit the existence of any nuisance upon the Property and shall at all times keep the Property in a proper, clean, safe and sanitary condition, and free from accumulations of waste materials, debris or refuse. 7.4.2 Release of Hazardous Substances Licensee shall not cause or allow the Release or threat of Release of any Hazardous Substance on, to, or from the Property. 7.4.3 Response Actions City of Edina v 01.10 Page 8 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee Licensee shall promptly take all necessary action in Response to any Release or Use of a Hazardous Substance at the Property caused by, or attributable to, any act or omission of Licensee (or Licensee's employees, agents, representatives or invitees) that could: a. give rise to any Claim under any Environmental Law, b. cause a public health or workplace hazard, or c. create a nuisance. 7.5 Required Notices/Disclosures 7.5.1 Transportation and Disposal Contracts Licensee shall, upon written request by CP, provide CP with copies of transportation and disposal contracts and manifests for Hazardous Waste, any permits issued under any Environmental Laws, and any other documents demonstrating that Licensee has complied with all Environmental Laws relating to the Property 7.5.2 Releases or Suspected Releases Licensee shall promptly notify CP of any actual or suspected Release of any Hazardous Substance on, to, or from the Property, regardless of the cause of the Release. 7.5.3 Notices, summons citations, etc. Licensee shall promptly provide CP with copies of all summons, citations, directives, information inquiries or requests, notices of potential responsibility, notices of violation or deficiency, orders or decrees, claims, causes of action, complaints, investigations, judgments, letters, notices of environmental liens or Response actions in progress, and other communications, written or oral, actual or threatened, from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or other federal, state or local agency or authority, or any other entity or individual, concerning: a. any Release of a Hazardous Substance on, to or from the Property, b. the imposition of any lien on the Property, or c. any alleged violation of or responsibility under any Environmental Law relating to the Property. 7.5.4 Other Reports Licensee shall, at CP’s option, provide CP, at no cost to CP, a copy of any other report, summary or written test results, collectively “Report,” pertaining to the Work. If any such Report is to be filed or made available to any governmental agency, other than Licensee, acting in a regulatory capacity, other than Licensee, then Licensee shall also give CP a reasonable time (not less than 5 working days) to review and comment on a draft of such Report and when preparing any such final Report pertaining to the Work, Licensee or its contractor shall give due consideration to CP's comments with respect to the draft of that Report. Licensee will promptly provide CP with a copy of any final Report. 7.6 CP’s right to Participate in Response Actions Following receipt of any notice, order, claim, investigation, information request, letter, summons, citation, directive, or other communication identified in section 7.5.3 in connection with any action taken pursuant to section 7.4.3, Licensee shall notify CP of any and all investigations, telephone conferences, settlement discussions, remediation plans and all other interactions, direct or indirect, with governmental or regulatory officials, and Licensee shall take all action necessary to ensure that any indemnification, release, waiver, covenant not to sue, or hold harmless agreement benefiting Licensee and arising out of such activities, whether from a governmental or regulatory entity or from a private entity, also benefits CP to at least the same extent as Licensee. 7.7 Restoration of Property City of Edina v 01.10 Page 9 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee Upon completion of the Work or expiration or early termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs first, Licensee shall remove any debris resulting therefrom and shall restore the Property to the condition it was in prior to the commencement of the Work (or such other condition as is satisfactory to CP). All excavations are to be backfilled and tamped. All borings shall be backfilled with grout. Drill cuttings shall not be used as backfill. Licensee shall dispose of all drill cuttings, soil and sediment samples, purge water, dewatering effluent, and water samples and all excess excavation material in a manner acceptable to CP and in accordance with all applicable laws, all at no expense to CP. 8. LIABILITY 8.1 Damage to CP Tracks, Facilities, and Equipment If any tracks, facilities, or equipment owned, used, or maintained by CP are damaged in connection with the Work, CP shall repair (or arrange for the repair of) such damage and Licensee shall pay the full cost of such repair within 30 days after CP shall tender a bill therefor. 8.2 Assumption of Risk Licensee is fully aware of the dangers of working on and about railroad property and railroad operations and knowingly and willingly assumes the risk of harm (e.g., injury to or death of persons and damage to or destruction of property) that may occur while on and about the Property. Without in any way limiting the scope of the preceding sentence, Licensee assumes the risk that monitoring wells, elevation bench marks, reference points, and other installations located on the Property may be disturbed, damaged, or destroyed by CP or third persons, and Licensee shall not make any claim against CP on account of same, even if such disturbance, damage, or destruction arises from the negligence of CP or its employees, agents, or invitees. Licensee assumes full responsibility for protecting its installations and personal property from theft and vandalism while such installations and personal property are on the Property. 8.3 Indemnity To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Licensee shall indemnify and defend the Indemnified Parties (as defined below) against all claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments, losses, damages, penalties, fines, and sanctions (collectively, “Claims”) arising out of or relating to any destruction of (or damage to) any property or natural resource, any injury to (or death of) any person, or any environmental pollution or contamination whatsoever, where such destruction, damage, injury, death, pollution, or contamination actually arises in whole or in part from the Work, any action or omission of Licensee while on or about the Property pursuant to this Agreement, or the exercise by Licensee of the license granted by this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, Indemnified Parties means the following businesses and their officers, directors, employees, and agents: Soo Line Corporation, Soo Line Railroad Company, Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corporation, Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad Corporation, Soo Line Corporation, Wyoming, Dakota Railroad Properties, Inc., Central Maine & Quebec Railway, The Milwaukee Motor Transportation Company, Hiawatha Transfer Company, and Canadian and Pacific Railway Company, and their respective parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliated companies, and any railway company or contractor operating trains or rail equipment upon railway tracks in close proximity to the Property, together with the parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliated companies of all of the foregoing. 9. INSURANCE Licensee shall, at its own expense, obtain and maintain during the Term and prior to entering the Property, in a form and with an insurance company satisfactory to CP, policies of: City of Edina v 01.10 Page 10 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee (a) Commercial General Liability (C.G.L.) insurance with a limit of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for any one loss or occurrence for personal injury, bodily injury, or damage to property including loss of use thereof. This policy shall by its wording or endorsement include without limitation the following: (i) CP and its associated or affiliated subsidiaries (and the Directors, Officers, employees, agents and trustees of all of the foregoing) as an additional insured with respect to obligations of the Licensee in this Agreement; (ii) "cross liability" or “severability of interest” clause which shall have the effect of insuring each entity named in the policy as an insured in the same manner and to the same extent as if a separate policy had been issued to each; (iii) blanket contractual liability, including the insurable liabilities assumed by the Licensee in this Agreement; (iv) broad form products and completed operations; (v) sudden and accidental pollution liability, if applicable; (vi) shall not exclude property damage due to explosion, collapse, and underground hazards; and (vii) shall not exclude operations on or in the vicinity of the railway right of way. (b) Automobile Liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per accident, covering the ownership, use and operation of any motor vehicles and trailers which are owned, non-owned, leased or controlled by the Licensee and used in regards to this Agreement. (c) Workers Compensation insurance which shall be in strict accordance with the requirements of the most current and applicable state Workers Compensation insurance laws, and Employers’ Liability insurance including Occupational Disease insurance with limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each accident/each employee, and where appropriate coverage under said policies to be extended for liability under the FELA, USL&H Act, and the Jones Act. The Licensee shall, before any services are commenced under this License submit written evidence that it has obtained full Workers Compensation insurance coverage for persons whom it employs or may employ in carrying out the services under this License. CP and its associated or affiliated companies (and the Directors, Officers, employees, agents and trustees of all of the foregoing) shall be waived of any and all subrogation in the event of injury, death, losses, incidents, claims and potential claims. (d) Contractor's Pollution Liability insurance, including naming CP and its associated or affiliated subsidiaries (and the Directors, Officers, employees, agents and trustees of all the foregoing) as an additional insured, with a limit of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for any one loss or pollution event. Coverage shall include, but not be limited to, claims for bodily injury, death, damage to property including the loss of use thereof, clean-up costs and associated legal defense expenses arising from pollution conditions caused by, and/or exacerbated by, services performed by the Licensee on behalf of CP. The policy shall be endorsed to contain a blanket contractual liability endorsement. If this policy is written on a "claims-made" basis it shall remain in effect for no less than twenty-four (24) months after the expiry or termination of this Agreement. IF APPLICABLE – DEPENDS ON SCOPE OF WORK BEING PERFORMED – CONFIRM WITH RISK MANAGEMENT (collectively, the “Insurance Coverage”). Licensee agrees that the insurance requirements set out herein shall not limit or restrict its liabilities pursuant to this Agreement. City of Edina v 01.10 Page 11 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee The Insurance Coverage required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be primary and not excess of any other insurance that may be available. Unless otherwise provided above, all insurance coverage shall take place in the form of an occurrence basis policy and not a claims made policy. Licensee shall waive any and all subrogation in the event of injury, death, losses, incidents, claims and potential claims where permissible under the insurance policies required under this Insurance Section. Licensee shall provide CP with written notice and all reasonable particulars and documents related to any damages, losses, incidents, claims, and potential claims concerning this Agreement as soon as practicable after the damage, loss, incident, or claim has been discovered. Licensee is responsible for any deductible and excluded loss under any insurance policy. The deductible in any insurance policy shall not exceed such maximum amount that a reasonably prudent business person would consider reasonable. The Insurance Coverage shall be endorsed to provide CP with not less than thirty (30) days written notice in advance of cancellation. Before Licensee enters the Property, CP must receive and approve certificates of insurance evidencing the Insurance Coverage outlined in this Section. Licensee may be required to annually provide a copy of updated certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the renewal of the above Insurance Coverage. Such certificate(s) of insurance shall be sent via email to matthew_miller@cpr.ca. Upon request, Licensee shall provide CP with certified copies of the insurance policies. CP shall have no obligation to examine such certificate(s) or to advise Licensee if its Insurance Coverage is not in compliance with this Agreement. Acceptance of any certificate(s) which are not compliant with the requirements set out herein shall in no way whatsoever imply that CP has waived its insurance requirements. CP reserves the right to require Licensee to obtain additional insurance where, in CP’s reasonable opinion, the circumstances so warrant. If the Licensee fails to maintain the Insurance Coverage required in this Agreement, CP may, at its option, terminate this Agreement without notice. 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 10.1 Survival of Indemnity Provisions The indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall survive its expiration or termination. 10.2 Mere License The permission encompassed by this Agreement is a mere license to use the Property for the specified purpose and does not create any estate or interest in the Property. 10.3 No Warranty of Title CP does not warrant that it has good title to the Property. 10.4 Assignment; Binding Effect This Agreement may not be assigned by Licensee without the advance written consent of CP. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties' respective successors and assigns. 10.5 Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota. 10.6 Entire Agreement This Agreement is the full, complete, and entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject hereof, and any and all prior writings, representations, and negotiations with respect to those subjects are superseded by this Agreement. City of Edina v 01.10 Page 12 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee 10.7 Headings The headings used in this Agreement are provided solely as a convenient means of reference. They are not intended to, and do not, limit or expand the purpose or effect of the paragraphs to which they are appended. The headings shall not be used to construe or interpret this Agreement. 10.8 Singular and Plural As used in this Agreement, the singular form of a word includes the plural form of that word, and vice versa, and this Agreement shall be deemed to include such changes to the accompanying verbiage as may be necessary to conform to the change from singular to plural, or vice versa. 10.9 Duplicate Copies and Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one and the same document. The parties may execute more than one copy of this Agreement, each of which shall constitute an original. 11. SIGNATURES. THE PARTIES HERETO have executed this Agreement as evidence of their agreement to the terms herein. City Of Edina, MN SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY doing business as Canadian Pacific By By Its Scott Neal City Manager Its Brian Osborne Manager Of Public Works Date Date City of Edina v 01.10 Page 13 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee EXHIBIT A Map of the Property City of Edina v 01.10 Page 14 of 12 Soo Line Railroad Company Edina, MN City of Edina, Licensee 2 EXHIBIT B Minimum Safety Rules for Work on Railroad Property Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.S. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2022 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2022. INTRODUCTION: The Transportation Commission reviewed the report at their September 15 regular meeting; comments are included in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2022 October 6, 2022 Mayor and City Council Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2022 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on September 1. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Engineer, Streets Public Service Worker, Transportation Planner, Public Works Director and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. The Police Sergeant was not able to attend but were informed of the decisions and had no objections to the recommendations. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the October 6 regular meeting. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Continued requests for parking restrictions between Dale Ave and 5313 W 56th St  5313 is a group home with frequent visitors and staffers.  In August, parking restrictions installed on south side of W 56th St between Dale Ave and approximately 19’ west of driveway at 5313 – allows one vehicle to park west of driveway.  Following 2021 street reconstruction project, width of W 56th is 24’ beginning at this location extending east.  Neighbors continue to have safety concerns when vehicles park in the space west of the driveway. Staff recommends moving the parking restriction sign east to restrict parking between the driveway and Dale Ave. 5313 W 56th St STAFF REPORT Page 2 A2. Request for parking restrictions on east side of Dale Ave, south of W 56th St  Dale and W 56th St reconstructed in 2021.  Parking is allowed on both sides of Dale.  August parking restriction added on W 56th, east of Dale.  NB vehicles on Dale turning left are impacted if vehicles are parked on east side of Dale.  Property at 5600 Dale receives damage from vehicles turning left.  To prevent further property damage, restrictions on east side of Dale beginning from driveway at 5605 extending north to W 56th St are necessary.  The Transportation Commission recommended installing a “No Parking Here to Corner” sign. Staff recommends adding a placard under the stop sign stating, “Keep Back 30 Feet”. A3. Request to clarify lane designations along W 77th St  Resident claims confusion of “Left Lane Must Turn Left” signs when traveling in the left- thru lane.  Designated left turn lanes on W 77th between HWY 100 and Computer Ave.  AADT 11,500.  No reported crashes citing the signs prompting confusion. Staff recommends removing the signs as they are unsuitable for the lane layout. A4. Request to change parking designations at City Hall along Eden Ave  City staff requesting update to parking bay designation along north side of Eden Ave.  Currently signed “Authorized Vehicles Only” with “Loading and Unloading Zone Only”.  City staff is parking personal vehicles within parking bays.  Staff requesting space for 1-2 spaces furthest east towards employee entrance to be loading and unloading only. Staff recommends designating the west bay “City Vehicles Only” and the east bay “Loading and Unloading Only”. Dale Ave and W 56th St Left Lane Must Turn Left signs Eden Ave at City Hall STAFF REPORT Page 3 A5. Request for parking restrictions within Wooddale Ln  Public Works staff is requesting restrictions along end of Wooddale Ln due to street widths.  When parking is utilized, prevents large vehicles from being able to turn around without colliding with retaining wall in center island.  PW has needed to repair wall on numerous occasions.  Width along center island varies around 20’.  Parking is restricted on south side of Wooddale.  Staff sought feedback from residents adjacent to end of cul-de-sac supporting parking restrictions, opposed to removal of retaining wall and tree. Staff recommends restricting parking in the cul-de-sac of Wooddale Ln to accommodate large vehicles and prevent damage to the retaining wall. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request for all-way stop controls at Division St and Rutledge Ave  Many residents contacted City Council regarding vehicle speeds and lack of yielding to pedestrians at this crosswalk over Division.  A crosswalk is present over Division, on the west side of Rutledge.  No crashes reported in last 10 years.  Curb extensions are present.  Previous use of an in-street crossing sign was removed following review of crosswalk policy.  2017 ADT and 85% speed 700 and 30.5 MPH respectively.  All-way stop controls not warranted.  The Transportation Commission recommended that staff reconsider this request given the proximity to Todd Park. Staff recommends no changes. Division at Rutledge Wooddale Ln STAFF REPORT Page 4 B2. Request for traffic calming along Valley View Rd  Continued complaints of speeds on Valley View following updated speed limit implementation.  Summer 2022 traffic study: i. 5800 ADT ii. EB 85% speed 36.7 MPH – 100 exceeding 40 MPH iii. WB 85% speed 34.2 MPH – 35 exceeding 40 MPH  2019 added shoulder striping and traffic signal at Wooddale Ave.  Crosswalk with flashers located at Concord Ave.  Request includes increased police presence, police mobile speed trailer, dynamic speed display signs or other ways to decrease speeds along Valley View.  Eight crashes on Valley View since 2018, most involved distracted driving or excessive speeds.  The Transportation Commission recommended that staff reconsider this request, propose a minimum of two solutions and report on traffic enforcement. Staff recommends increased police enforcement along Valley View Rd. Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study C1. Request for signage at the crosswalk markings over Halifax Ave between W 50th and Market Sts  Crosswalk RRFBs were removed in 2021 after the sign entering the woonerf to the east received damage on many occasions.  In-street markings are present.  Residents cite many close calls.  Approximately 160’ north of W 50th St.  Crosswalk policy states no crosswalk should be within 300’ of another- other examples of crosswalks within 300’ along W 50th St and Market St.  Recently, standard roadside signs were installed to meet minimum treatments. Staff recommends further study of crosswalks within the district as future overlays anticipated in 2025 can provide opportunities for further safety measures. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A resident requested speed bumps along the southern driveway entrance to Pamela Park. Edina refrains from installing speed bumps on public streets and driveways as they provide liability concerns. D2. A submission requested the removal of a dead animal on W 70th St near Cornelia Dr. The Animal Control Officer was notified and the animal was removed. Crosswalks within 50th & France Valley View STAFF REPORT Page 5 D3. Two submissions made for one-sided parking restrictions along Hillside Rd and Tower St. The residents were notified to submit a petition to City Council with their neighbors. D4. Speed concerns were submitted along Lakeview Dr, Dundee Rd and Balder Ln. Traffic studies found 85% speed of 26.3, 26.6 and 26.2 MPH respectively, no action warranted. D5. Two concerns submitted of detoured traffic along Griffit St during a closure of Blake Rd. The resident was informed of the length of the closure and the EPD was notified of the detoured speed concerns. D6. A resident requested insight before adding landscaping to their property adjacent to the intersection of Hibiscus and Normandale. The resident was informed of the Clearview Ordinance to provide proper sight lines. D7. Two complaints submitted about sight lines at the northeast corner of W 62nd St at Ewing Ave. The resident was informed of the City’s Clearview Ordinance and was requested to improve the sight lines. D8. A complaint was made regarding the lack of vehicles stopping at the intersection of W 58th St at Wooddale Ave. The EPD was notified of this for enforcement. D9. A resident is requesting a police presence near Our Lady of Grace School when the school is let out, especially following work along Eden Ave. The EPD was informed of this request. D10. A request to improve the crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Vandervork Ave by adding RRFBs. The crosswalk meets City standards, and the requestor was informed to submit a petition to City Council for further treatments. D11. A concern was raised regarding a protective fence being down near the Jerry’s parking garage off Gus young Ln. The contractor was notified of the issue and was resolved. D12. A crash was reported on France Avenue and the requestor was notified to contact the EPD. D13. A resident was concerned with vehicles detouring onto Ewing Avenue during an emergency closure on France Avenue between W 60th and W 58th St. Police and Public Works responded and posted a proper detour during the closure. D14. A submission made about a downed tree over Valley View Rd near Edina High School. Edina Police was contacted and the tree was removed by staff. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.T. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks & Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Van Valkenburg Park Athletic Field Irrigation Replacement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Van Valkenburg Park athletic field irrigation replacement by Peterson Companies for $110,412. INTRODUCTION: The irrigation system for the three fields at Van Valkenburg P ark is over 34 years old and requires extra maintenance. The replacement system will be computer controlled with modern irrigation heads that will save water and improve the conditions of the fields. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Van Valkenburg Athletic Field Irrigation Replacement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200216 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tom Swenson Date: 09/26/2022 Requisition Description:Replace irrigation system at Van Valkenburg park Vendor:PETERSON COMPANIES INC Cost:$110,412.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION:Replace irrigation system at Van Valkenburg Park BUDGET IMPACT: CIP approved project Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Will improve conditions while saving water. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:New system will save water. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.U. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director of Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase and Waive Permit Fees: Edina Aquatic Center Ingress/Egress Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for ingress/egress improvements at the Edina Aquatic Center with Peterson Companies, Inc., for $95,925, and waive permit fees valued at $2,108. INTRODUCTION: Bolton & Menk completed an Occupancy and Code Compliance Study as it relates to occupancy and proper ingress/egress locations at the Edina Aquatic Center. Upon completion of this project, the work will ensure that the requisite code and for appropriate emergency gate access points in addition to modifications for the primary ingress/egress entrance to the facility will be in compliance. This work would require a building permit application. By waiving the permit fees this makes the project more affordable and ensures that the site plan is reviewed for compliance by the City's inspection division. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Edina Aquatic Center Ingress/Egress and Waive Permit Fee Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200219 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tracy Petersen Date: 09/27/2022 Requisition Description:Edina Aquatic Center Ingress/Egress Improvements Vendor:PETERSON COMPANIES INC Cost:$95,925.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION:Ingress/Egress Improvements at Edina Aquatic Center BUDGET IMPACT: CIP Asset Preservation Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Provide code-compliant and safe entry and exit locations for users ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.V. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Envisio Software for Strategic Planning and Performance Dashboards Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the request for purchase and contract with Envisio Software for $82,500 for strategic planning and performance dashboards. INTRODUCTION: As part of the 2022-2023 Budget Work Plan, Council approved a work plan initiative to evaluate and implement transparency tools and dashboards for City budget and overall performance. An internal staff team was assembled to complete this project. The team developed project objectives, demoed six software vendors and has selected Envisio as the software of choice. T he contract is for three years at $25,000 per year, with a one-time $7,500 implementation fee. Upon approval of the contract, staff will start phase 2 of the project to create an implementation plan in hopes to launch the software early in 2023. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Envisio Software Envisio Master Service Agreement Final Envisio Quote Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200212 Department:Administration Buyer:Lisa Schaefer Date: 09/22/2022 Requisition Description:Envisio software Vendor:ENVISIO SOLUTIONS INC Cost:$82,500.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Software for strategic planning and performance dashboards Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Transparency tool to help share City work plan goals with public ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:None, service contract. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Page 1 223376v2 ENVISIO SOLUTIONS INC. MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT PLEASE READ THIS MASTER SERVICE AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) CAREFULLY. THIS AGREEMENT APPLIES TO ENVISIO SOLUTIONS INC. (“ENVISIO”) AND ANY CUSTOMER (THE “CUSTOMER”) WHO UTILIZES ENVISIO’S SAAS STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION SOFTWARE SERVICES DESCRIBED HEREIN (THE “SERVICE”), WHETHER OR NOT THE CUSTOMER PAYS FOR THE SERVICE. ACCEPTING THE TERMS BY ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER BY CLICKING A BOX OR BY EXECUTING AN ORDER OR QUOTATION FORM THAT REFERENCES THIS AGREEMENT, THE CUSTOMER AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF THE CUSTOMER IS ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF A COMPANY OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, THE CUSTOMER REPRESENT THAT THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BIND SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. IF THE CUSTOMER DOES NOT HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY, OR THE CUSTOMER DOES NOT AGREE WITH THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, THE CUSTOMER MUST NOT ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT AND MAY NOT USE THE SERVICES. This Agreement was last updated on September 14, 2022. It is effective between the Customer and Envisio as of the date of the Customer’s acceptance of this Agreement. 1 PURCHASED SERVICES 1.1 Provision of Purchased Services Envisio shall provide to the Customer the Service that is ordered by the Customer (“Purchased Services”) on Envisio’s invoice or quotation form (each an “Quote”) during a Subscription Term (as defined below). The Service is hosted on Envisio’s service provider platform, “Heroku” (owned by Salesforce.com). Heroku’s physical infrastructure is hosted and managed within Amazon’s secure data centers and utilizes the Amazon Web Service (“AWS”) technology. The Customer further acknowledges that the Customer Data (as defined below) resides on AWS’s servers either in the USA or Canada (available on request). The Customer may access the Service, but has no right to receive a copy of the object code or source code to the Service. The Customer must have high speed Internet connection, and compatible hardware and up to date ‘browser’ software to access the Service, none of which are Envisio’s responsibility. 1.2 Subscription License Unless otherwise stated in the applicable Quote, the Purchased Services are purchased as a subscription license (the “Subscription”) and non-transferrable to a third party. Additional Users (as defined below) can be added to the Subscription during the Subscription Term at the same pricing as the underlying Subscription, prorated for the portion of that Subscription Term remaining, and any added Subscription will terminate on the same date as the underlying Subscriptions. 2 ENVISIO’S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Provision of Service Envisio will use commercially reasonable efforts to make the Service available to the Customer 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, except for planned downtime of which Envisio shall provide at least 24 hours notice via the Service and scheduled to the extent practicable during the weekend hours between 6 pm Friday and 3 am Monday Pacific Time. Any unavailability Page 2 223376v2 caused by circumstances beyond Envisio’s reasonable control including but not limited to: the malfunction of equipment, acts of God, act of government, flood, fire, earthquake, civil unrest, act of terror (collectively, “Force Majeure”), or the activities of third parties not under Envisio’s control (including Internet and other service providers) is not the responsibility of Envisio. Envisio will make reasonable efforts to reduce to a minimum and mitigate the effect of any Force Majeure. 2.2 Customer Data The Customer must provide all data for use in the Purchased Services (the “Customer Data”) and Envisio is not obliged to modify or add to it. The Customer Data belongs to the Customer and they are solely responsible for the content and accuracy. The Customer grants to Envisio all necessary licenses in and to such Customer Data solely for Envisio to provide the Service to the Customer. Envisio will treat the Customer Data as confidential and will not disclose it to third parties unless as compelled by law or unless expressly permitted in writing by the Customer. Envisio will not access the Customer Data except as necessary to address service or technical issues, at the Customer’s request. As part of Envisio’s standard Service offering, Envisio will make daily backup copies of the Customer Data and maintain such data for a period of seven weeks. 2.3 Software Uptime Agreement Envisio endeavours to provide 99.9% uptime with respect to the Purchased Services in each calendar month during the Term, excluding: (a) any scheduled maintenance times; (b) factors outside Envisio’s reasonable control; and (c) downtime related to the Customer’s or third party hardware, software or services. If in any calendar month this uptime commitment is not met by Envisio and the Customer was negatively impacted from a resulting disruption to the Purchase Services as determined in Envisio’s sole discretion acting reasonably, Envisio shall provide, as the sole and exclusive remedy, a service credit equal to 25% of one month’s fee for the use of the Service (the “Credit”). 2.4 Service Level Agreement There are several ways to get support for using Envisio, including online knowledge base, technical support, consulting support, and community support options. The Customer Success Team technical and consulting support is available during our regular business hours on weekdays that are not legal Canadian holidays. Regular business hours are listed below for the time zone in which your organization is located: >> 9:00 am EST until 8:00 pm EST >> 8:00 am CST until 7:00 pm CST >> 7:00 am MST until 6:00 pm MST >> 6:00 am PST until 5:00 pm PST The following targets will be used for response to support requests: Severity Initial Response Resolution Updates Critical 1 hour Work continuously Every business day Page 3 223376v2 High 2 hours As soon as possible Every other business day Medium 4 hours As soon as possible Every other business day Low Following business day Reasonable effort Weekly Severity indicators are defined as follows: >> Critical - Envisio is down and no workaround is available. >> High - Use of Envisio is impaired but instances are up and running. No workaround is available. >> Medium - A function of Envisio has failed, but Envisio is still useable. Support is aware of the issue. >> Low - Envisio functionality is not impaired. This priority also includes feature, information, documentation, how-to, and enhancement requests. Updates will continue until the issue is resolved or there is a workaround in place. We aim to resolve all issues expeditiously, but when an issue is difficult to solve and takes longer than one business day, we will provide updates on our progress according to the schedule listed above. Canadian holidays observed in British Columbia include: New Year's Day (January 1), Family Day (third Monday in February), Good Friday (Friday before Easter), Easter Monday, Victoria Day (Monday before May 25), Canada Day (July 1), British Columbia Day (first Monday in August), Labour Day (first Monday in September), Thanksgiving (second Monday in October), Remembrance Day (November 11), and Christmas Day (December 25). Envisio offices close for the entire week for the Christmas holiday. 2.5 Credit Request In order to receive the Credit, the Customer must provide sufficient evidence to support the Credit and email info@envisio.com within 5 days of the end of the applicable calendar month. If the Customer is past due or in default with respect to any payments owed to Envisio under this Agreement, the Customer is not eligible to receive the Credit. 2.6 Provision of Professional Services Implementation services are offered during Envisio’s core business hours which are Monday through Friday, 8:30am to 5:00pm Pacific Time. 3 CUSTOMER’S USE OF THE SERVICE 3.1 Authorized Users The Customer agrees to maintain authorized users based on the number of user accounts (“Accounts”) purchased under the Subscription as stated in the Quote. Only the Customer or persons or entities that have access to an Account through a username and password for the Account (each a “User” and collectively, the “Users”) may use the Account. If the number of Users exceeds the Accounts purchased, Envisio will notify the Customer’s Administrator (as defined in Section 3.2 below) via email of the overage and the Customer will have 5 business days following delivery of such email to make any changes necessary to address the overage. Following that 5 business day period, if the overage remains Envisio will invoice the Customer for the additional Accounts required to address the overage at the same fee as the existing Accounts subscribed for under the Subscription, prorated for the duration of the Subscription Term remaining and the Customer will pay the invoice according to the terms outlined in Section 5.4 below. 3.2 Email and Notices Page 4 223376v2 At the time of ordering the Service from Envisio, the Customer shall identify the administrator(s) responsible for the Accounts (each an “Administrator”). The Customer agrees to provide Envisio with the Administrator’s contact information including e-mail address. By providing the Administrator’s e-mail address, the Customer agrees to receive all required notices electronically to the Administrator’s e-mail address. Customer may identify multiple Administrators and Envisio agrees to send all required notices to each Administrator identified by Customer. The Administrator shall be responsible on behalf of the Customer for managing the Accounts, maintaining all User information, and the Purchased Services used by the Customer. It is the Customer’s sole responsibility to notify Envisio if the Customer changes or intends to change its Administrator(s). 3.3 Users: Passwords, Access and Notifications It is the Customer’s responsibility to change and maintain its Users’ records in Envisio to secure access to the Account. The Customer is also solely responsible for ensuring the confidentiality and secrecy of each User’s login. The Customer agrees not to disclose its Users’ login information to any third party and will prevent its employees and personnel from sharing User’s login information amongst themselves. The Customer will be responsible for all electronic communications generated through the Service, including, but not limited to, Account registration and notices. The Customer is only entitled to access and use the Service and the Account for lawful purposes. Customer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to or use of the Service and shall promptly notify Envisio of such unauthorized access or loss/theft of any of its Users’ login information. 3.4 Restrictions The Customer is responsible for all activities conducted under its User accounts and ensuring their Users’ compliance with this Agreement. The Customer shall not: (a) permit concurrent use of a single User account, or time-sharing of the Service; (b) knowingly post or transmit any Customer Data that contains viruses, worms, time bombs, Trojan horses or any other contaminating, corrupting or destructive features, or use the Service in an irresponsible manner that interferes with the proper working and normal operation of the Service, or detrimentally interferes with personal information or property of another; (c) copy, modify, create a derivative work of, reverse engineer, reverse assemble, disassemble, decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code or modify the Service in any manner or form; or (d) transfer, sell, lease, rent or assign, in any way, all or a portion of, the Account and/or the Service to any third party (other than Users in accordance with Section 3.1). This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 4 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The Customer acknowledges that Envisio retains all right, title and interest in and to the Service and all software, materials, formats, interfaces, information, data, content and Envisio’s proprietary information and technology used by Provider or provided to Customer in connection with the Service (the “Envisio Technology”), and that the Envisio Technology is protected by intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Envisio. Other than as expressly set forth in this Agreement, no license Page 5 223376v2 or other rights in the Envisio Technology are granted to the Customer, and all such rights are hereby expressly reserved by Envisio. The Customer must not, without Envisio’s express written consent, use any of Envisio’s trademarks, service marks, copyrighted materials, or other intellectual property. The Customer acknowledges that any ideas, suggestions, concepts, processes or techniques that it provides to Envisio related to the Service or Envisio’s business (the “Feedback”) shall become Envisio’s property without any compensation or other consideration payable to the Customer by Envisio, and the Customer does so of its own free will and volition. Envisio may or may not, in its sole discretion, use or incorporate the Feedback, in whatever form or derivative that Envisio may decide, into the Service, documentation, business or other products. The Customer hereby assigns all rights on a worldwide, exclusive basis in perpetuity to Envisio in any Feedback and, as applicable, waives any moral rights to the Feedback. This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5 PURCHASED SERVICES AND PAYMENT 5.1 Term of Agreement This Agreement is effective between the Customer and Envisio as of the date of the Customer’s acceptance of this Agreement and continues until the Subscription Terms with respect to each Subscription subscribed for by the Customer hereunder has expired or terminated. 5.2 Term of Subscriptions and Renewal The term of each Subscription (the “Subscription Term”) shall be as set out in the applicable Quote. Unless otherwise set out in the applicable Quote, each Subscription shall automatically renew for additional periods equal to the expiring Subscription Term or one year (whichever is shorter), unless either party gives the other notice of non-renewal at least 30 days before the end of the Subscription Term. The per-unit pricing during renewal will be the same as that during the immediately prior term unless Envisio has provided the Customer written notice of a pricing increase, not to exceed 10% per annum, at least 60 days before the end of that prior term, in which case the pricing increase will be effective upon renewal and thereafter. 5.3 Service Fees The Customer shall pay Envisio the fees specified on the Order Form (the “Fees”). Fees are based on Purchased Services comprising of subscription fees and implementation fees and are non-refundable. Purchased Services cannot be decreased during the Subscription Term. This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5.4 Invoicing and Payment Billing for the Purchased Services will be in advance on an annual (twelve months) basis. Unless otherwise stated in the Quote, invoiced charges are due on receipt. The Customer is responsible for providing complete and accurate billing and contact information to Envisio and notifying Envisio of any changes to such information. Overdue invoices will incur a 2% per month interest charge. If the Customer fails to pay the invoice within the Due Date, Envisio may, at its sole discretion, declare the Account delinquent (a “Delinquent Account”). This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5.5 Applicable Taxes Page 6 223376v2 Envisio shall charge the Customer, and the Customer shall pay to Envisio, all applicable taxes, including any retroactive taxes on past Fees or charges (whether already paid or not) in cases where Envisio is under a legal obligation to collect such tax from the Customer. The Customer shall be responsible for any and all other taxes that the Customer is under a legal obligation to pay. This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5.6 30-Day Money Back Guarantee Within 30 days after the Customer has signed this Agreement, upon the Customer's written cancellation request, Envisio will refund all subscription fees paid by the Customer. Customer will still be liable for implementation fee and any professional fees in respect of professional services ordered. After 30 days, all Purchased Services are non-refundable and non-cancellable. 6 TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION 6.1 Envisio’s Right to Suspend the Account Envisio reserves the right to suspend the Customer’s Account and access to and use of the Service under the following conditions: ● the Account becomes a Delinquent Account; or ● Envisio reasonably concludes that the Account is being used to engage in denial service attacks, spamming, or illegal activity, and/or use of the Account is causing immediate, material and/or ongoing harm to Envisio and others. In the extraordinary event that Envisio suspends the Customer’s access to the Service, Envisio will use commercially reasonable efforts to limit the suspension to the offending portion of the Service and resolve the issues causing the suspension of the Service. 6.2 Termination for Cause/Expiration Either party (the “Complaining Party”) may immediately terminate this Agreement and all Quotes issued hereunder in the event the other party (the “Breaching Party”) commits a material breach of any provision of this Agreement which is not cured within thirty (30) days of written notice from the non-breaching party. Such notice by the Complaining Party shall expressly state all of the reasons for the claimed breach in sufficient detail so as to provide the Breaching Party an opportunity to cure such alleged breach and shall be sent to the Breaching Party in accordance with the notice requirements set out in Section 10.9 below. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, Customer shall have no rights to continue use of the Service. If this Agreement is terminated by Customer for any reason other than a termination expressly permitted by this Agreement, then Envisio shall be entitled to Fees for the Services rendered prior to termination. If this Agreement is terminated as a result of Envisio’s breach of this Agreement, then Customer shall be entitled to a refund of the pro rata portion of any subscription fees paid by Customer to Envisio under this Agreement for the terminated portion of the Term. 6.3 Handling of Customer Data Upon Termination Effective upon cancellation of the Account, Envisio may deactivate the Account and be entitled to delete the Account and the Customer Data from the Service on the date the Subscription Term expires. The Customer further agrees that Envisio shall not be liable to the Customer nor to any third party for any termination of the Customer’s access to the Service or deletion of the Customer Data, provided that Envisio is in compliance with the terms of this Section 6.3. It is the responsibility of the Customer to obtain a full data export, screen captures and download all necessary reports and any other Customer data, Page 7 223376v2 should the Customer wish to keep the data. Envisio shall provide at least 30 days notice to Customer prior to effective cancellation of the Account and shall continue to render any necessary cooperation and assistance to Customer until Customer has downloaded or obtained all necessary data reports, screen captures, and any other Customer data that Customer wishes to retain or is required by law to retain, within 60 days following termination date. 7 PRICE AND SERVICE CHANGES 7.1 Software Subscription Fees 7.2 Implementation Professional Services Fees Initial Implementation Services, as defined in the Envisio implementation Guide, are quoted at a fixed cost and, unless otherwise stated in the Envisio order form, are scheduled and offered for a period of 12 months from the commencement of the Subscription Term. Envisio will make all reasonable effort to deliver on the full agreed-upon implementation scope during the initial 12-month period. Additional Implementation Services required as a result of add-on feature purchases or as a result of implementation delays outside Envisio’s control during the initial 12-month period will be charged at an hourly rate of $175 per person per hour. 8 WARRANTIES 8.1 Our Warranties Envisio warrants that (a) the Service will achieve in all material respects the functionality described in the applicable technical documentation for the Service that is provided from time to time by Envisio to the Customer (the “Help Documentation”), and (b) Envisio will not materially decrease the functionality of the Service subscribed for under a Subscription during the applicable Subscription Term. The Customer’s sole and exclusive remedy for Envisio’s breach of this warranty shall be that Envisio be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to modify the Service to achieve in all material respects the functionality as described in the Help Documentation and, if Envisio is unable to restore such functionality, the Customer shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement and receive a pro-rata refund of the subscription fees paid under this Agreement for the Subscription for the terminated portion of the Subscription Term. 8.2 Disclaimer of Warranty THE SERVICE AND ANY OTHER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ENVISIO TO THE CUSTOMER ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE”, WITH ALL FAULTS AND WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET OUT HEREIN. ENVISIO HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED, COLLATERAL OR STATUTORY WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR CONDITIONS, WHETHER WRITTEN OR ORAL, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, SECURITY, RELIABILITY, COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, QUALITY, INTEGRATION OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF ANY OF THE FOREGOING, PROVIDER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY THAT ANY DATA OR INFORMATION PROVIDED TO CUSTOMER IN CONNECTION WITH CUSTOMER’S USE OF THE SERVICE (INCLUDING ALERTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS) IS ACCURATE, OR CAN OR SHOULD BE RELIED UPON BY CUSTOMER FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION 8.2, “ENVISIO” INCLUDES ENVISIO’S DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, SUCCESSORS, PARENT COMPANIES AND THEIR (INCLUDING ENVISIO’S) EXECUTIVES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, ATTORNEYS, MANAGERS, EMPLOYEES, CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, AFFILIATES, RESELLERS, THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS, MERCHANTS, LICENSORS AND THE LIKE. This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. Page 8 223376v2 9 LIMITATION AND EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY 9.1 Limitation of Liability (a) IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVISIO BE LIABLE TO OTHER PARTY FOR ANY (I) SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, (II) LOST SAVINGS, PROFIT, DATA, USE OR GOODWILL, OR (III) BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, EVEN IF NOTIFIED IN ADVANCE OF SUCH POSSIBILITYARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED TO THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF CAUSE OF ACTION OR THE THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE, GROSS NEGLIGENCE, FUNDAMENTAL BREACH, BREACH OF A FUNDAMENTAL TERM) OR OTHERWISE. (b) IN NO EVENT WILL THE TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS IN CONNECTION WITH OR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FEES PAID BY THE CUSTOMER TO ENVISIO IN THE 12 MONTHS PRECEDING THE DATE THE CAUSE OF ACTION FIRST AROSE. (c) THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 9.1(A) AND 9.1(B) SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THE CAUSE OF ACTION GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM ARISES FROM: I. A BREACH OF A PARTY’S CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT; OR II. CLAIMS FOR FEES OWED TO ENVISIO UNDER THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY COST, EXPENSE OR FEES INCURRED IN THEIR COLLECTION. THE CUSTOMER SHALL MAKE NO CLAIM, COMPLAINT, OR PROCEEDING AGAINST ENVISIO FOR ANY OR ALL PORTIONS OF THE SERVICES THAT MAY REQUIRE THE DOWNLOADING OF WEB SITE COOKIES FOR THE CUSTOMER TO ACCESS SUCH PORTIONS OF THE ACCOUNT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION 9.1, “ENVISIO” INCLUDES ENVISIO’S DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, SUCCESSORS, PARENT COMPANIES AND THEIR (INCLUDING ENVISIO’S) EXECUTIVES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, ATTORNEYS, MANAGERS, EMPLOYEES, CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, AFFILIATES, RESELLERS, THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS, MERCHANTS, LICENSORS AND THE LIKE. This Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 10 GENERAL 10.1 Interpretation of this Agreement The term “including,” wherever used in any provision of this Agreement, means “including but without limiting the generality of any description preceding or succeeding such term.” Any rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguity is to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be applicable in the construction or interpretation of this Agreement. The division of this Agreement into sections/paragraphs, and the insertion of headings/captions, are for the convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this Agreement or be deemed a part of this Agreement. 10.2 Inurement The rights and liabilities of both the Customer and Envisio (collectively, the “Parties”) under this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties’ respective successors, executors, and administrators, as the case may be. Page 9 223376v2 10.3 Assignment Neither party may assign this Agreement without written consent of the other, except that Envisio may assign without consent to a related entity or the successor of all or substantially all of the assignor’s business or assets to which this Agreement relates. This Agreement does not create any joint venture, partnership, agency, or employment relationship between the parties, although Envisio reserves the right to name Customer as a user of the Service. 10.4 Governing Law This Agreement and any other agreement for the Services shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without regard to conflicts of laws principles. All proceedings related to this Agreement shall be venued in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods will not apply to this Agreement. 10.5 Severability If any provision or portion of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 10.6 Independent Contractors Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating a partnership or relationship of employer and employee, principal and agent, partnership or joint venture between the parties. Each party will be deemed an independent contractor at all times and shall have no right or authority to assume or create any obligation on behalf of the other party, except as may be expressly provided herein. The Customer must not, in any way, misrepresent the Customer’s relationship with Envisio, attempt to pass itself off as Envisio, or claim that the Customer is Envisio. 10.7 Injunction The Customer acknowledges and agrees that money damages are not an adequate remedy for any breach or threatened breach related to Envisio’s rights or the Customer’s use of the Service beyond the rights granted to Customer in this Agreement. The Customer therefore agrees that in addition to other remedies available hereunder, by law or otherwise, Envisio shall be entitled to an injunction against any such breach by the Customer. 10.8 Notices Notice to Customer Any notice to the Customer from Envisio will be sent to the e-mail address of the Administrator, or provided in writing, registered postal service (postage prepaid), or by pre-paid commercial courier delivered to the Customer at the mailing address specified on their Account. Notice to Company Any and all notices to Envisio from the Customer must be given by in writing, e-mail, first class postal service (postage prepaid), or by pre-paid commercial courier delivered to Envisio at: Page 10 223376v2 Envisio Solutions Inc. 300-15300 Croydon Drive Surrey, BC V3Z 0Z5 Tel: 888-371-4800 email: info@envisio.com 10.9 Complete Agreement This Agreement constitutes the complete understanding and agreement between the Customer and Envisio. Except when expressly agreed to the contrary in signed writing by an authorized representative of Envisio, this Agreement supersede any other written (including digitized/computerized) agreement, oral agreement, and/or agreement by conduct. This Agreement or any other specific agreement for the Service between Envisio and the Customer shall each be exclusively between Envisio and the Customer only and shall not confer any rights in any third party. This Section 10 shall survive and termination or expiration of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the duly authorized representatives of each Party hereto as of the Effective Date. For Envisio Solutions Inc. _____________________________________ Print Name: ___________________________ Title: _________________________________ Date: ________________________________ For (Customer) _____________________________________ Print Name: ______________________ Title: ____________________________ Date: ________________________________ 1. Prices set forth in this quote are valid for the period stated. All prices are quoted in US Dollars and are not inclusive of any applicable taxes. An invoice for the agreed amount will be issued upon acceptance of this quote. 2. Acceptance of this quote is acceptance of the accompanying Master Services Agreement (MSA) or a previously signed MSA in the event of renewal/upsell. Payment methods: ACH, Wire or Check Remit to email: finance@envisio.com ACH/Wire Payment To Account Name: Envisio Solutions Inc. | Bank: Silicon Valley Bank | Bank Address: 3003 Tasman Dr. Santa Clara, CA 95054 ABA/ACH Routing #: 121140399 | Account #: 3303262267 | Account Type: Checking Terms and Conditions Date: _________________________Name: ________________________________________ Signature: _____________________________________ USD 82,500.00Total Price USD 82,500.00Subtotal  mdias@envisio.comEmail Madison DiasPrepared By 30/09/2022Expiration Date 31/08/2022Created Date 1700759Quote Number 4801 W 50th St Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 United States Bill To City of Edina, MNBill To Name Product Description Quantity Sales Price Total Price Envisio Implementation: One-time fee. A managed implementation service including plans and data audit, software configuration, system admin training, user training, reporting framework development and initial adoption support. Implementation services offered for 90-days. 1.00 USD 7,500.00 USD 7,500.00 3-year subscription for unlimited users to Envisio Plans, Analytics and Public Dashboard with up to unlimited active plans. Includes software licensing and online support. Billed annually at $25,000.3.00 USD 25,000.00 USD 75,000.00 3-year Single Sign-On (SSO) connection and maintenance fee 1.00 USD 0.00 USD 0.00 Quote Accepted By: Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.W. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2022-94: Appointing Election Judges for the November 8 General Election Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2022-94 appointing election judges for the General Election on Tuesday, November 8. INTRODUCTION: For the State General Election, there are 230 election judges, including 33 juniors and seniors from Edina High School. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-94: Appointing Election Judges for the November 8 General Election Exhibit A List of Election Judges RESOLUTION NO 2022-94 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022, STATE GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina Election Judges for the November 8, 2022, General Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Edina City Council also establishes an Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 203B.121; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 6th day of October 2022. Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October 6, 2022 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ______________, 20_______. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Exhibit A - State General Election Judges Kristine Aldonas Mariacecilia Alexander David Alkire Kathleen Amlaw Amy Anderson Kristin Anderson Natalie Anderson Valerie Anderson Addie Arfman Ayomide Ayelomi Angela Balouch Althea Barrows Barry Becklin Kathleen Bedor Margaret Bell Andrea Bender Harvey Berg Jason Berger John Bjorklund Sheila Bjorklund Thomas Bodin Janice Bolin Rachel Bond Katherine Bradbury Rachel Brekke David Briscoe Catherine Brunkow Sherra Buckley Paula Budde Kim Budish Paula Budish Erin Buss Aiden Caldwell Raja Chinnakotla Peter Choukalas Tag Ciccone Susan Clark Jennifer Collins Julianne Condon Deidre Corniea Deborah Croker Molly Cronin Robert Cummins Edward Dell Amy Demarest Claire Dempsey John DeVoe Stephen Dieringer Wendy Donovan Jan Doudiet Jim Doudiet Jennifer Doval Marilyn Doyle Philip Dugan Celeste Eckstein Cynthia Edwards Jeanene Engebretson Lucia Everist Lisa Farnam Catherine Fenlason Paul Fink Daniel Finn Scott Forbes Carrie Fordahl Harold Fotsch Kathryn Fredell Rebecca Frederick Michelle Freese Kelly Fries Maya Frydenlund Suzanne Fuluvaka Abdallah Gabr Denise Gamache Jack Garfin Devorah Goldstein Joe Gorecki Elizabeth Gorman Katherine Graf Charlie Green Justin Grussing Julie Guelich Kathryn Hagen Andy Halper Brian Hansen Janette Hansen Molly Harrington Karen Hartwig Steven Hartwig Lisa Hatzung Lucky Hawes Kamille Hawkinson Joy Hazucha Melissa Hermes Eileen Hokkanen Marilyn Horowitz Kaitlyn Hou Susan Housh Lynn Hovde Eliot Howard Sarah Hu Sara Hudson Karen Huffman Jennifer Huwe Madeleine Isaacson Denice Jasper Cecily Johnson Grant Johnson Rita Johnson Seth Johnson Mary Kachan Mandy Kao Susan Keator Debbie Keeler Louise Kellams Christina Kennedy Carol Kerr Katherine (Kit) Ketchum Maria Kim Linda King Maggie Knack Mary Knapp Andrea Knoll Lauren Koskey Judith Krzyzek Inga Kunze-Williams Elizabeth Laukka John Leroy Dan Lew Reynold Lindquist Ulrica Loichle Cynthia Loveland Sanxiu (Sissi) Lu Susan Lundgren Teresa Luterbach Linda Maetzold Catherine Mahowald Traci Mann Lori Manning Michael Martiny Mary McDonald Patrick McDougle Jesse McWilliams Jeffrey Merriam Gary Meyer Nancy Miller Deborah Minkler Sabeehudeen Mirza Palmer Monsen Jon Moon Zach Morton Colleen Mueller Jai Negri Laura Nelson Lorna Nelson Brian Nerheim Sarah Neumeier Nanette Nys Jason Odegaard Kim Ok-soon Leslie Olsen Norman Owens Amy Pampusch Brigitte Parenteau Sarah Patzloff Tracy Pepper Anita Peske Lisa Pohlman Richanta Pollard Taylor Polomis Judie Pomerleau Linda Presthus Paul Presthus Griffith Pugh Stanley Ransom Ajay Rawal Nancy Reed Eric Rehm Gil Robles Judith Rodgers Luann Rosenthal-Erickson Carol Rothe Sabrina Rubenstein Nancy Ryman Kathryn Sandahl Heidi Sandmeier Kurt Schellhas Laura Schleck Erica Schmiel Marty Sedoff Claire Shane Rakiya Sheikhosman Mary Skube Del Smith Margaret Smith Ruth Smith David Smythe Mary Stanton Mara Stelzer Bob Strickland Aditya Suresh Ann Swenson Lia Tabor Pat Teynor Ann Thompson Donna Tilsner Terri Traudt Susie Van Hoomissen Joshue Vargas-Erickson Louann Waddick Mary Watson Stefani Weber Deanna Weeks Barbara Wendt Carolyn Wenger Wayne Wenger Thomas Wentz Laura Westlund Ronn Williamson Jane Wilson Jerry Wilson Lisa Wittmer Catherine Wolf Linda Wood Michael Wood Mary Yee Ianthe Zabel Janet Zahorsky Barry Zilka Hillary Zuleger Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:Heritage Preservation Commission: Century Homes Program Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. Additional Century Homes program items will be included in the Heritage Preservation Commission's 2023 work plan. INTRODUCTION: Initiative #5 on the 2022 Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) work plan is "Explore the development of a century home recognition program in Edina based on programs in other cities; define the resources needed to manage a potential program in the future." Commissioners Hassenstab, Lonnquist and student member Maheshawi will present the outcome of the 2022 work plan item. There is a draft commission correspondence document attached that will be finalized and approved by the HPC at the next meeting and will be on a future Council agenda. ATTACHMENTS: Description Century Homes Presentation Draft Advisory Communication Century Homes Workplan UpdateJane LonnquistAshwin MaheshwariMark Hassenstab HPC Work Plan Initiative #5HPC Work Plan Initiative #5HPC Work Plan Initiative #5HPC Work Plan Initiative #51. Historic Awareness2. Community Connection3. Environmental ImpactOpportunity StatementOpportunity StatementOpportunity StatementOpportunity Statement Timing ImplicationsTiming ImplicationsTiming ImplicationsTiming ImplicationsBacklog and coming years:219| Homes already 100 years old18| Turning 100 in 202335| Turning 100 in 202477| Turning 100 in 2025Develop effective public education and outreach programs which promote the preservation, protection, and use of historic properties.City Map: Examples from other CitiesExamples from other CitiesExamples from other CitiesExamples from other CitiesCity Managed By Timing Recognition Application Fee Special NoteSt. Cloud City + HPC Annual Bronze Plaque $230 More than 85 homes to dateHastings City + HPC Annual Painted Aluminum Plaque$150 Facebook Users’ favorite gets plaque fee waivedSaint Louis Park Historical Society Ongoing Bronze Plaque $350 Great home research resources listedMinneapolis City Ongoing Bronze Plaque $410 For any significant buildingHopkins Historical Society Ongoing Certificate None On hold for staffingLake City City + HPC Annual Bronze Plaque $180 Online list and summary lives on city webpagePlaque SuggestionsPlaque SuggestionsPlaque SuggestionsPlaque Suggestions No Interest House Novel Plaque•Inventory•Follow up on cyclical basis•Innovative option•Willing and able partner•Traditional option•Timeless and establishedExamples from other CitiesExamples from other CitiesExamples from other CitiesExamples from other Cities HouseNovelHouseNovelHouseNovelHouseNovel Application ProcessApplication ProcessApplication ProcessApplication Process Primary Partners•Edina Historical Society – going to bring it up at next board meeting•HouseNovel – use Edina as template for national rollout•Other state historical preservation offices•Other local optionsSecondary Partners•Edina Rotary club•Edina Public schools•Community EducationPossible PartnersPossible PartnersPossible PartnersPossible Partners Process FlowProcess FlowProcess FlowProcess FlowOngoing Marketing and public awarenessHome is nearing 100 yearsTargeted outreach to ownersAccept on rolling basisRouted to appropriate selection avenueYESNOTry again laterAnnual splash for May “National Preservation Month” TimelineTimelineTimelineTimelineTimeline Action Item2022202220222022JanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuary Work Plan item: “Define resources needed to manage a potential program”OngoingOngoingOngoingOngoing Gathering best practice ideas from existing Century Home programs in MNAugustAugustAugustAugust Input from HPC, House Novel partnership conversation, submit 2023 work planSeptemberSeptemberSeptemberSeptember Finalize input from Edina Historical SocietyOctoberOctoberOctoberOctober Submit deliverables for Council consideration: “information and a recommendation for a future century home program in Edina.”Define expense categories needed for 2023 work plan if 2022 moves forward.2023202320232023JanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuary Potential Work Plan Initiative: Prepare all elements needed for a successfulFebruaryFebruaryFebruaryFebruary Conduct mailing to 219 Edina homes built in 1922 or earlier to explore potentialinterest and receive input on program designMarchMarchMarchMarchCommittee compiles community input and submits draft materials to staffAugustAugustAugustAugustSubmit deliverables for Council consideration and FY24 Work Plan Initiative2024202420242024JanuaryJanuaryJanuaryJanuary Potential Ongoing Work Plan Initiative “Review and approve applications to theCentury Home program when submitted, with annual community announcementand website update each May during National Preservation Month. Appendix Green light to continue defining resources needed to manage the program•Staff support•Website update•Outreach materials•Plaque design•Process feedback / approvalWhat are we asking Edina City to do?What are we asking Edina City to do?What are we asking Edina City to do?What are we asking Edina City to do? Century Homes Program Proposal – Working DraftHeritage Preservation Commission, 2022 Work Plan Item #5:Explore the development of a century home recognition program in Edina based on programs in other cities; define the resources needed to manage a potential program in the future.Opportunity StatementCities across the country have established Century Homes Recognition Programs in order to recognize and celebrate homes that are at least 100 years old. The benefits to these programs include:Historic Awareness: Interested applicants conduct and submit their own research of their home, including past applicants, architectural and construction details, historic photos, and other interesting facts. By merely suggesting resources such as the city and county historical societies, these programs encourage hyper-local history research and build a repository for sharing this information with the community. The program can also direct interested homeowners to additional resources, such as a training session with local “house detective” Kathleen Kullberg or use of the HouseNovel platform co-founded by an Edina native.Community Connection: The placards displayed for this honorary award prompt curiosity and interest within the communities where they exist. Opportunities for creating self-guided walking tours or other outreach programs featuring century homes have been utilized in other cities to build engagement and pride in a community and its past. Adopting a program similar to those used in other towns would advance the mission of the Heritage Preservation Commission, whose stated mission in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan is “to preserve the City’s historically significant resources (sites, districts, buildings, and objects) and ensure that they will be available for future generations to provide a sense of identity and continuity in a rapidly-changing world. It is the belief of the Commission that these things reflect and shape values and aspirations and thereby contribute to the City’s identity.”Environmental Impact: While the construction industry often portrays older homes as energy inefficient, new understanding documents how older buildings are often the greenest. The Architecture 2030 and Zero Net Carbon Collaborations quantified that buildings are the world’s largest source of carbon emissions at 39%, followed by industry (30%), transportation (22%), and other (9%). Building carbon emissions comprise 28% from operations and 11% from materials and construction. Property owner efforts that seek to reduce emissions from both areas, through rehabilitation and maintenance, can result in a 70-85% reduction in embodied carbon emissions compared to new construction.Source: "Building Reuse is Climate Action" Starts 44:25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1TlrrA_2mYOpportunity Statement ExpandedOpportunity Statement ExpandedOpportunity Statement ExpandedOpportunity Statement Expanded HouseNovelHouseNovelHouseNovelHouseNovel PartnershipPartnershipPartnershipPartnership Heritage Preservation Commission Advisory Communication For Review at October, 2022 Meeting Situation The HPC has completed the following 2022 work plan item: Initiative Title: Explore the development of a century home program in Edina based on programs in other cities; define the resources needed to manage a potential program in the future. Deliverable: Information and a recommendation for a future century home program in Edina. Background A Commissioner learned about Century Home Programs while attending a State Preservation Conference in St. Cloud in 2019. The model presented is utilized in various forms nationwide: - owners of properties that are at least 100 years old prepare a very brief report sharing what they know of their home’s history, - they submit the form to city staff, HPC, Historical Commission or combination thereof, along with payment to cover the expense of a plaque they will receive to display, - communities utilize and celebrate the history of these homes in various ways. While the workflow was designed so that a potential Edina Century Homes program could be ready to launch in 2024, concurrent with the centennial of the Country Club District, the program is intentionally a means to spotlight heritage resources in other areas of the city. Assessment The subcommittee researched models from seven Minnesota communities and developed the attached presentation. A Century Home Program would require very modest staff work or city expense, yet provide numerous opportunities to achieve the City’s stated preservation goals.The HPC enthusiastically responded to the presentation and offered detailed feedback. Two notable updates to the Opportunity Statement, listed fully in the presentation’s appendix: 1. Community Connection: In late August we received this enthusiastic response from Molly McIntosh, Executive Director of the Edina Historical Society, “our board is very motivated to help out, myself included!” EHS-HPC collaboration is a stated goal of the Comprehensive Plan. One board member is eager to lead Century Home walking tours. 2. Environmental Impact: Each commission has been asked to consider a 2023 work plan item that advances the city’s climate agenda. Despite conventional wisdom, the oldest building is often the greenest, when the full carbon impact of materials, demolition, and new construction are considered along with the carbon impact of building operations. Next Step The HPC will be proposing the following work plan item for 2023: Initiative Title: Finalize and approve all elements and expenses of a Century Home recognition program to launch in 2024, in collaboration with the Edina Historical Society. Deliverables: Text and design for web page, plaque, applications materials, community outreach flier, and project management guidelines. Create and approve associated budget. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Dan Doar, Graphic Designer Item Activity: Subject:2022 "Images of Edina" Presentation Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Each year, residents and those who work in Edina are called to submit their favorite photographs taken over the past year in the community in the "Images of Edina" photo contest, co-sponsored by the City of Edina and Edina Magazine. The photos are judged on subject matter, composition, clarity, depth of field, lighting, quality of color or black and white, artistry and drama, degree of difficulty, Edina relevance and overall impact. From the submitted photos, judges chose the winning photographs in five categories: Business, P eople, Activities & Events, Places in Edina, and P lants & Animals. Once submissions were finished, the photos were published on Edina Magazine's website for voting on a Readers' Choice award. The winners of the 2022 Images of Edina Contest are: Business – “RH Light” by Nancy Fergesen People – “Dry Dock Repair” by Vicki Hurwitz Activities & Events – “Soccer Sunset” by Leah Steidl Places in Edina – “Library Day” by Rebecca P eterson Plants & Animals – “Surprise!" by July Fulk Readers’ Choice – “Library Day” by Rebecca Peterson The winners have been notified and will be present to receive their awards. Also at the meeting, a "Best of Show" winner will be announced. Mayor James Hovland will present the awards. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Presentation The CITY of EDINA 2022 “Images of Edina” Photo Contest The CITY of EDINA“Images of Edina” categories EdinaMN.gov 2 •Activities & Events •Business •People •Places in Edina •Plants & Animals •Reader’s Choice •Best in Show The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 3 Activities & Events “Soccer Sunset” by Leah Steidl The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 4 Business “RH Light” by Nancy Fergesen The CITY of EDINA People EdinaMN.gov 5 “Dry Dock Repair” by Vicki Hurwitz The CITY of EDINA Places in Edina EdinaMN.gov 6 “Library Day” by Rebecca Peterson The CITY of EDINA Plants & Animals EdinaMN.gov 7 “Surprise!” by Judy Fulk The CITY of EDINA Readers’ Choice EdinaMN.gov 8 “Library Day” by Rebecca Peterson The CITY of EDINA Best in Show EdinaMN.gov 9 “Dry Dock Repair” by Vicki Hurwitz Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2022-90 Certification of Delinquent Utilities No. DU-22 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close the public hearing at noon October 10 and continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Minnesota Statute 444.075 allows Cities to “charge a charge again the owner, lessee, occupant or all of them and may provide and covenant for certifying unpaid charges to the county auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes are collected”. City of Edina City Code section 28-52 through section 28-57 allow for the certification of water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling delinquent accounts. The City of Edina has certified unpaid utility bills to the county for collections for many years. Hennepin County requires council resolution prior to certification. Utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent one month or longer were notified in writing of the pending certification and the time and date of the hearing in a letter dated September 12, 2022. Customers who have not paid by October 19, 2022 will be charged a $35 administrative fee to cover the additional costs associated with the certification process. Customers will continue to have the opportunity to pay their overdue balances through November 21, 2022. After November 21, payments for the certified portion of customer bills are no longer accepted by the City and certification balances as of the end of business that day are certified to Hennepin County. Delinquent utility amounts certified to Hennepin County will also include an interest rate of 6.5%, per City policy. As of September 12, 2022, 1,127 properties were sent notices for a total of $739,464. In 2021, the final certification included 300 properties for a total of $283,682.19. The delinquent utility list attached includes those properties that remain on the 2022 certification list as of Tuesday, September 27, 2022. There are a total of 651 properties with a delinquent amount of $477,827on this list. Staff expects the final total certified to the County on November 20 will be less. To respect the privacy of delinquent customers, the attached list omits the names of property owners. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2022-90: Certification of Delinquent Utilities No. DU-22 Staff Presentation List of Delinquent Utility Properties RESOLUTION NO. 2022-90 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR WHEREAS, the Edina City Code section 28-52 through section 28-57 allows for the certification of delinquent utility charges (water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling) to the County Auditor for collection pursuant to the provision of MN Statute 444.075. WHEREAS, the Finance Department has prepared a list of delinquent utility charges together with the legal description of the premises served, the official copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and attached to this resolution. WHEREAS, all parties have been notified by mail of the certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate copy of this resolution and the list of delinquent accounts to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the County, and such delinquent accounts shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes with interest from the date of this resolution at the rate of 6.5 percent (6.5%) per annum and including a $35.00 administrative penalty pursuant to the provisions of MN Statute 444.075. The description of the certification is: NAME OF CERTIFICATION INSTALLMENTS Delinquent Utilities DU-22 Levy No. 22035 1 Year Passed and adopted by the City Council on October 18, 2022. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 . City Clerk The CITYofEDINACertification of Delinquent Utility BillsOctober 6, 2022 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Process•Utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent 30 days or longer were notified in writing of the pending certification and the date of this hearing.•A $35.00 administrative fee will be added to delinquent accounts after October 19th.•Customers will continue to have the opportunity to pay the overdue balances until November 21st.www.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Process•The delinquent list and resolution 2022-90 (approved at the October 18thCity Council meeting) and sent to the County for certification.•Certified amounts will pay an interest rate of 6.5%.•All are one year assessments.www.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Historywww.EdinaMN.gov42016201720182019202020212022Sept. Notices# Properties787 1,031 731 1,092 1,222 756 1,127$ Amount$ 407,090 $ 453,930 $ 354,047 $ 542,875 $ 635,945 $ 518,279 $739,464Oct. Public Hearing# Properties464 428 542 519 432 602 651$ Amount$ 291,457 $ 281,104 $ 296,593 $ 331,706 $ 302,528 $ 441,981 $477,827Nov. Certification# Properties329 288 334 332 372 300 TBD$ Amount$ 227,354 $ 225,131 $ 231,122 $ 251,670 $ 275,490 $283,682 TBD The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Actions•Today is the Public Hearing•Adopt Resolution 2022-90 at October 18thCity Council meeting, certifying this year’s delinquent utility bills to the County Auditor for collection with the 2023 property taxes.www.EdinaMN.gov5 Service Address Town/City State Zip Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 7100 AMUNDSON AVE EDINA MN 55439-2019 Active First Notice $13,964.97 7017 AMUNDSON AVE EDINA MN 55439-2017 Active First Notice $12,452.31 5844 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2825 Active First Notice $9,912.16 7070 AMUNDSON AVE EDINA MN 55439-2016 Active First Notice $8,545.64 4660 77TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-4901 Active No Collection Activity $7,595.08 7711 COMPUTER AVE EDINA MN 55435-5402 Active First Notice $5,279.43 5409 LONDONDERRY RD EDINA MN 55436-1026 Active No Collection Activity $3,872.62 5701 PARKWOOD LN EDINA MN 55436-1731 Active First Notice $3,460.09 5525 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2335 Active $3,403.96 7001 CAHILL RD EDINA MN 55439-2018 Active First Notice $3,267.48 7201 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439-2632 Active First Notice $3,174.76 6841 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55435-1626 Active First Notice $3,140.51 29 CIRCLE WEST EDINA MN 55436-1312 Active First Notice $2,661.02 6100 SHERMAN CIR EDINA MN 55436-1954 Active First Notice $2,514.09 6223 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1915 Active First Notice $2,489.30 5944 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1824 Active First Notice $2,435.32 6731 APACHE RD EDINA MN 55439-1073 Active First Notice $2,378.41 4800 WILFORD WAY EDINA MN 55435-1563 Active No Collection Activity $2,362.42 6120 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2830 Active First Notice $2,319.12 5718 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55436-1105 Active First Notice $2,261.96 4405 ELLSWORTH DR EDINA MN 55435-4149 Active First Notice $2,209.82 6212 ST ALBANS CIR EDINA MN 55439-1149 Active No Collection Activity $2,163.00 5151 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD EDINA MN 55439-3013 Active No Collection Activity $2,151.23 6517 INDIAN HILLS RD EDINA MN 55439-1006 Active First Notice $2,150.47 5804 AMY DR EDINA MN 55436-1932 Active First Notice $2,118.21 5701 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2337 Active First Notice $2,073.31 6213 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2743 Active First Notice $2,034.25 6000 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2821 Active First Notice $1,991.03 4436 CLAREMORE DR EDINA MN 55435-4136 Active No Collection Activity $1,986.39 6601 BELMORE LN EDINA MN 55343-2017 Active First Notice $1,936.91 5324 62ND ST W EDINA MN 55436-2661 Active First Notice $1,919.33 5575 78TH ST W EDINA MN 55439-2701 Finalled No Collection Activity $1,903.15 5433 VERNON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2300 Active First Notice $1,902.39 321 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55343-2023 Active First Notice $1,892.12 4451 76TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-5111 Active First Notice $1,846.83 6908 CRESTON RD EDINA MN 55435-1641 Active First Notice $1,845.52 6016 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424-1732 Active First Notice $1,827.20 4836 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA MN 55424-1167 Active First Notice $1,813.04 6121 PARNELL AVE EDINA MN 55424-1743 Active First Notice $1,791.10 4805 70TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-4061 Active First Notice $1,782.99 4622 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424-1159 Active First Notice $1,703.45 6212 BRAEBURN CIR EDINA MN 55439-2548 Active First Notice $1,698.00 4601 WOODLAND RD W EDINA MN 55424-1554 Active First Notice $1,693.36 6921 MCCAULEY TRL S EDINA MN 55439-1068 Active First Notice $1,689.61 4532 56TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1555 Active First Notice $1,679.00 5300 HOLLYWOOD RD EDINA MN 55436-1425 Active First Notice $1,639.51 5920 DEWEY HILL RD EDINA MN 55439-1724 Active First Notice $1,616.77 7625 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55435-5123 Active No Collection Activity $1,588.29 6116 BIRCHCREST DR EDINA MN 55436-2628 Active First Notice $1,588.10 5600 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436-2035 Active First Notice $1,564.16 6012 KILLARNEY LN EDINA MN 55436-1812 Active First Notice $1,506.64 6508 GLEASON CT EDINA MN 55436-1850 Active First Notice $1,485.60 6433 MARGARETS LN EDINA MN 55439-1017 Active First Notice $1,469.81 3705 FULLER ST EDINA MN 55410-2365 Active First Notice $1,463.72 4244 SCOTT TER EDINA MN 55416-5036 Active No Collection Activity $1,440.75 5125 DUGGAN PLAZA EDINA MN 55439-1452 Active First Notice $1,421.22 4820 ASPASIA LN EDINA MN 55435-4070 Active First Notice $1,417.06 6613 IROQUOIS TRL EDINA MN 55439-1015 Active First Notice $1,415.02 5825 GROVE ST EDINA MN 55436-2273 Active First Notice $1,413.85 7713 GLASGOW DR EDINA MN 55439-2617 Active First Notice $1,405.52 5816 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424-1906 Active First Notice $1,388.59 4405 CLAREMORE DR EDINA MN 55435-4135 Active First Notice $1,382.23 6824 BROOK DR EDINA MN 55439-1304 Active First Notice $1,381.01 4506 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424-1103 Active No Collection Activity $1,379.94 4441 CLAREMORE DR EDINA MN 55435-4135 Active First Notice $1,378.44 6000 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2722 Active First Notice $1,370.65 14 WOODLAND RD EDINA MN 55424-1631 Active First Notice $1,354.70 6805 RIDGEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55439-1430 Active First Notice $1,351.06 5032 BEDFORD AVE EDINA MN 55436-2110 Active First Notice $1,348.91 5516 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436-2034 Active First Notice $1,340.01 5401 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1033 Active First Notice $1,338.16 5104 62ND ST W EDINA MN 55436-2620 Active First Notice $1,323.77 5709 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2404 Active First Notice $1,323.72 5709 PARKWOOD LN EDINA MN 55436-1731 Active First Notice $1,321.36 4805 ASPASIA LN EDINA MN 55435-4066 Active First Notice $1,303.52 5752 DUNCAN LN EDINA MN 55436-1639 Active First Notice $1,297.55 5912 CRESCENT DR EDINA MN 55436-2508 Active First Notice $1,275.46 6405 INDIAN HILLS RD EDINA MN 55439-1133 Active First Notice $1,270.96 6020 VIEW LN EDINA MN 55436-1827 Active First Notice $1,250.26 5200 GRANDVIEW LN EDINA MN 55436-2114 Active First Notice $1,237.88 5908 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2834 Active First Notice $1,230.80 6312 MILDRED AVE EDINA MN 55439-1448 Active First Notice $1,228.58 4601 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1140 Active No Collection Activity $1,223.99 4825 MAPLE RD EDINA MN 55424-1226 Active No Collection Activity $1,217.27 5521 COUNTRYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55436-2503 Active First Notice $1,209.65 6109 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2839 Active First Notice $1,208.78 5509 HILLSIDE CT EDINA MN 55439-1217 Active First Notice $1,206.18 4733 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424-1717 Active First Notice $1,202.25 6111 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1946 Active First Notice $1,197.33 5201 48TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-1407 Active First Notice $1,188.13 6201 VERNON CT EDINA MN 55436-1670 Active First Notice $1,180.56 6029 KAYMAR DR EDINA MN 55436-1208 Active First Notice $1,173.14 5601 HAWKES DR EDINA MN 55436-2217 Active No Collection Activity $1,172.60 5221 62ND ST W EDINA MN 55436-2679 Active First Notice $1,171.04 4608 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424-1159 Active First Notice $1,167.07 5208 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2445 Active First Notice $1,157.01 4224 SCOTT TER EDINA MN 55416-5036 Active No Collection Activity $1,156.20 5008 CLOVER RIDGE EDINA MN 55436-2630 Active First Notice $1,132.79 5004 MOORE AVE EDINA MN 55436-1517 Active First Notice $1,131.26 6949 SOUTHDALE RD EDINA MN 55435-1648 Active First Notice $1,126.89 305 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8465 Active First Notice $1,122.03 6121 RIDGEWAY RD EDINA MN 55436-2545 Active First Notice $1,119.34 4009 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416-5073 Active First Notice $1,105.99 7625 METRO BLVD EDINA MN 55439-3053 Active First Notice $1,104.74 5232 DUGGAN PLAZA EDINA MN 55439-1407 Active First Notice $1,102.38 5825 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424-1712 Active First Notice $1,102.20 6621 MOHAWK TRL EDINA MN 55439-1029 Active No Collection Activity $1,091.45 5412 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2202 Active First Notice $1,085.11 409 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8403 Active First Notice $1,073.40 5616 DALE AVE EDINA MN 55436-2469 Active First Notice $1,070.55 5337 WHITING AVE EDINA MN 55439-1255 Active First Notice $1,062.09 4509 ANDOVER RD EDINA MN 55435-4031 Active First Notice $1,057.04 6355 WARREN AVE EDINA MN 55439-1243 Active First Notice $1,056.80 2 BRIDGE LN EDINA MN 55424-1223 Active First Notice $1,047.45 5128 WILLIAM AVE EDINA MN 55436-2127 Active First Notice $1,045.90 4521 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1122 Active First Notice $1,039.41 7736 PONDWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439-2763 Active First Notice $1,035.27 5705 WOODLAND LN EDINA MN 55424-1446 Active First Notice $1,030.87 5741 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2642 Active First Notice $1,028.75 6937 MARK TERRACE CIR EDINA MN 55439-1622 Active First Notice $1,028.42 5929 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424-1832 Active First Notice $1,027.11 5032 KENT AVE EDINA MN 55436-2430 Active First Notice $1,024.77 4211 OAKDALE AVE EDINA MN 55416-5033 Active First Notice $1,022.26 4740 70TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-4060 Active First Notice $1,012.41 6401 RYAN AVE EDINA MN 55435-1566 Active First Notice $1,008.24 4003 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424-1213 Active First Notice $1,007.94 4921 SUNNYSLOPE RD E EDINA MN 55424-1166 Active First Notice $1,006.64 5345 WHITING AVE EDINA MN 55439-1255 Active First Notice $1,003.83 4238 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55416-5019 Active First Notice $1,003.09 5308 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1032 Active First Notice $997.99 5117 TIFTON DR EDINA MN 55439-1464 Active First Notice $996.25 4517 GILFORD DR EDINA MN 55435-4042 Active First Notice $994.79 5933 GRIMES AVE EDINA MN 55424-1936 Active First Notice $993.51 5304 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA MN 55436-2011 Active First Notice $992.31 6109 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1925 Active No Collection Activity $992.09 6017 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2723 Active First Notice $980.03 6305 VIRGINIA AVE EDINA MN 55424-1762 Active First Notice $977.41 4400 CURVE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1047 Active First Notice $957.54 6429 WILRYAN AVE EDINA MN 55439-1454 Active First Notice $956.71 4607 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424-1231 Active First Notice $950.65 6332 RYAN AVE EDINA MN 55435-1516 Active First Notice $950.05 6213 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424-1737 Active First Notice $950.05 5400 RICHMOND LN EDINA MN 55436-2437 Active First Notice $945.86 4436 VANDERVORK AVE EDINA MN 55436-1431 Active First Notice $943.88 317 JEFFERSON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8442 Active First Notice $939.30 7469 WEST SHORE DR EDINA MN 55435-4064 Active First Notice $937.44 4812 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424-1718 Active First Notice $931.16 5809 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2401 Active First Notice $929.82 5800 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2825 Active First Notice $926.78 5501 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1035 Active First Notice $926.28 5709 BROOK DR EDINA MN 55439-1336 Active First Notice $913.01 4721 SCHOOL RD EDINA MN 55424-1717 Finalled First Notice $912.90 414 VAN BUREN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8462 Active First Notice $911.13 4617 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1144 Active No Collection Activity $907.55 6208 CREST LN EDINA MN 55436-2532 Active First Notice $905.95 6129 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1802 Active First Notice $905.58 6501 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1424 Active No Collection Activity $905.21 3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY EDINA MN 55435-5923 Active First Notice $902.86 6212 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2742 Active First Notice $899.27 5237 MEADOW RIDGE EDINA MN 55439-1412 Active First Notice $896.93 5348 WHITING AVE EDINA MN 55439-1256 Active First Notice $892.43 5117 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2442 Active First Notice $891.25 6217 CRESCENT DR EDINA MN 55436-2530 Active First Notice $891.03 6222 BRAEBURN CIR EDINA MN 55439-2548 Active First Notice $888.15 4010 MORNINGSIDE RD EDINA MN 55416-5026 Active First Notice $887.30 404 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55343-8553 Active First Notice $886.43 6729 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55435-2800 Active First Notice $879.44 3930 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1202 Active No Collection Activity $878.83 6401 MENDELSSOHN LN EDINA MN 55343-8424 Active First Notice $876.77 424 VAN BUREN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8462 Active First Notice $874.99 5800 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2810 Active First Notice $871.35 5840 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424-1820 Active First Notice $868.64 5728 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2346 Active First Notice $867.15 4602 CASCADE LN EDINA MN 55436-1514 Active First Notice $864.45 6400 WILRYAN AVE EDINA MN 55439-1446 Active First Notice $862.59 4909 PRESCOTT CIR EDINA MN 55436-1011 Active First Notice $856.82 7008 LYNMAR LN EDINA MN 55435-4123 Active First Notice $852.12 5912 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2736 Active First Notice $850.73 5917 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2711 Active First Notice $850.72 6221 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2743 Active First Notice $850.45 5121 BLOSSOM CT EDINA MN 55436-1305 Active No Collection Activity $847.91 5720 LOIS LN EDINA MN 55439-1341 Active First Notice $847.60 5825 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1817 Active No Collection Activity $844.97 4911/4921 77TH ST W EDINA MN 55435 Active No Collection Activity $842.73 5108 70TH ST W EDINA MN 55439-2102 Active First Notice $841.22 6425 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1422 Active No Collection Activity $840.32 7145 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55439-1656 Active First Notice $833.61 6721 HILLSIDE LN EDINA MN 55439-1319 Active First Notice $832.66 5028 BRUCE PL EDINA MN 55424-1318 Active First Notice $831.51 5124 TIFTON DR EDINA MN 55439-1457 Active First Notice $831.23 7104 GLEASON RD EDINA MN 55439-1607 Finalled First Notice $827.40 5320 62ND ST W EDINA MN 55436-2661 Active First Notice $824.34 7011 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439-1827 Active First Notice $819.15 6113 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2831 Active No Collection Activity $812.08 7112 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439-1808 Active First Notice $809.20 7302 CLAREDON DR EDINA MN 55439-1722 Active First Notice $809.20 405 VAN BUREN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8461 Active First Notice $807.26 6624 LONDONDERRY DR EDINA MN 55436-1721 Active First Notice $804.29 4212 70TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-4106 Active No Collection Activity $802.47 6200 VIRGINIA AVE EDINA MN 55424-1759 Active First Notice $800.37 3201 60TH ST W EDINA MN 55410-2808 Active First Notice $800.37 7023 MCCAULEY TRL EDINA MN 55439-1027 Active First Notice $794.55 4200 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55416-5019 Active First Notice $792.89 5224 62ND ST W EDINA MN 55436-2659 Active First Notice $779.77 6901 DAWSON LN EDINA MN 55435-1601 Active First Notice $779.77 7021 MCCAULEY TRL EDINA MN 55439-1027 Active First Notice $779.60 4501 BROOKSIDE TER EDINA MN 55436-1511 Active First Notice $776.69 6400 ROLF AVE EDINA MN 55439-1435 Active First Notice $774.22 6515 BARRIE RD EDINA MN 55435-2305 Active First Notice $773.03 6317 PARNELL AVE EDINA MN 55435-1511 Active First Notice $770.78 6204 BELMORE LN EDINA MN 55343-8577 Active First Notice $767.09 5101 49TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-1536 Active First Notice $761.22 5025 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55436-2642 Active First Notice $752.98 6600 MOHAWK TRL EDINA MN 55439-1030 Active First Notice $750.16 5708 68TH ST W EDINA MN 55439-1362 Active No Collection Activity $749.96 6447 MCCAULEY TER EDINA MN 55439-1021 Active First Notice $749.67 5702 NEWPORT DR EDINA MN 55436-1726 Active First Notice $749.08 5133 WILLIAM AVE EDINA MN 55436-2126 Active First Notice $748.80 5432 HIGHWOOD DR W EDINA MN 55436-1247 Active First Notice $746.81 4235 GRIMES AVE EDINA MN 55416-5020 Active First Notice $744.30 7020 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55435-4141 Active First Notice $743.56 4109 MORNINGSIDE RD EDINA MN 55416-5027 Active First Notice $743.38 6913 GLEASON CIR EDINA MN 55439-1600 Finalled First Notice $739.24 4217 SCOTT TER EDINA MN 55416-5035 Active First Notice $733.18 5007 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1319 Active No Collection Activity $730.15 5420 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424-1600 Active First Notice $727.86 6212 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424-1854 Active First Notice $726.55 6609 RIDGEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55439-1415 Active No Collection Activity $726.13 5508 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424-1502 Active First Notice $720.24 6200 SANDPIPER CT EDINA MN 55436-1926 Active First Notice $718.67 6609 WEST SHORE DR EDINA MN 55435-1528 Active First Notice $717.20 7723 GLEASON RD EDINA MN 55439-2563 Active First Notice $716.11 5213 MEADOW RIDGE EDINA MN 55439-1412 Active First Notice $708.95 6227 WESTRIDGE BLVD EDINA MN 55436-2561 Active First Notice $707.09 6200 PARKWOOD RD EDINA MN 55436-1141 Active First Notice $705.36 301 HARRISON AVE EDINA MN 55343-2032 Active First Notice $705.27 7717 GLASGOW DR EDINA MN 55439-2617 Active No Collection Activity $704.35 6728 WEST TRL EDINA MN 55439-1061 Active First Notice $702.47 7316 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55435-4158 Active No Collection Activity $699.33 6424 PARNELL AVE EDINA MN 55435-1513 Active No Collection Activity $692.50 414 KRESSE CIR EDINA MN 55343-8563 Active No Collection Activity $689.50 5825 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55436-2484 Active First Notice $686.21 6905 MCCAULEY TRL EDINA MN 55439-1068 Active No Collection Activity $682.74 405 MADISON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8448 Active No Collection Activity $680.80 76 WOODLAND CIR EDINA MN 55424-1451 Active First Notice $678.87 7501 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55435-4704 Finalled First Notice $676.09 20 CIRCLE WEST EDINA MN 55436-1358 Active First Notice $674.40 5305 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1306 Active First Notice $672.22 7703 TANGLEWOOD CT EDINA MN 55439-2565 Active First Notice $671.95 5305 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436-2051 Active No Collection Activity $670.81 4519 56TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1556 Active First Notice $668.14 5312 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2305 Active First Notice $664.89 5117 WILLIAM AVE EDINA MN 55436-2126 Active No Collection Activity $656.86 5008 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1314 Active First Notice $654.05 7707 TANGLEWOOD CT EDINA MN 55439-2565 Active No Collection Activity $652.97 5228 56TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-2447 Active First Notice $651.20 6112 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1924 Active First Notice $649.53 6201 ASHCROFT LN EDINA MN 55424-1729 Active First Notice $648.82 6324 WARREN AVE EDINA MN 55439-1244 Active First Notice $647.44 3709 CHOWEN CURV EDINA MN 55410-2731 Active No Collection Activity $637.49 5305 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2331 Active First Notice $635.25 4306 BRANSON ST EDINA MN 55424-1043 Active First Notice $634.82 5544 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2439 Active First Notice $631.60 6332 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1421 Active First Notice $623.89 4613 MEADOW RD EDINA MN 55424-1231 Active First Notice $618.28 6212 LOCH MOOR DR EDINA MN 55439-1618 Active First Notice $614.52 5205 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55436-2608 Active First Notice $610.03 12 OVERHOLT PASS EDINA MN 55439-1146 Active No Collection Activity $607.97 5129 WILLIAM AVE EDINA MN 55436-2126 Active First Notice $607.57 4902 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55424-1524 Active First Notice $601.34 4608 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1139 Active First Notice $599.67 6132 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2823 Active First Notice $598.40 3909 GRIMES LN EDINA MN 55424-1938 Active First Notice $597.86 7213 CORNELIA DR EDINA MN 55435-4159 Active No Collection Activity $594.01 6028 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2828 Active First Notice $590.71 4901 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1145 Active First Notice $589.66 5825 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2833 Active First Notice $586.40 4243 ALDEN DR EDINA MN 55416-5009 Active First Notice $584.51 4200 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424-1930 Active First Notice $584.04 5232 MEADOW RIDGE EDINA MN 55439-1411 Active First Notice $582.75 5500 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55424-1527 Finalled No Collection Activity $582.52 6909 DAWSON LN EDINA MN 55435-1601 Active First Notice $575.18 6400 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55439-1201 Active First Notice $572.45 4417 GILFORD DR EDINA MN 55435-4153 Active First Notice $572.19 5216 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1307 Active First Notice $569.02 5657 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424-1653 Active No Collection Activity $568.74 4234 SCOTT TER EDINA MN 55416-5036 Active First Notice $566.51 6419 STAUDER CIR EDINA MN 55436-1044 Active First Notice $559.32 4925 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA MN 55424-1170 Active First Notice $558.82 4912 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA MN 55424-1169 Active First Notice $558.43 5420 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1609 Active No Collection Activity $552.37 6621 SOUTHDALE RD EDINA MN 55435-1650 Active First Notice $551.38 6212 PARKWOOD RD EDINA MN 55436-1141 Active No Collection Activity $546.84 5036 YVONNE TER EDINA MN 55436-2424 Active First Notice $541.75 6841 SALLY LN EDINA MN 55439-1064 Active First Notice $531.60 4104 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55416-5017 Active No Collection Activity $526.14 4909 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA MN 55424-1170 Active No Collection Activity $524.54 3817 55TH ST W EDINA MN 55410-2359 Active No Collection Activity $524.27 6013 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1830 Active First Notice $521.18 6305 ASHCROFT LN EDINA MN 55424-1731 Active First Notice $519.96 4704 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424-1752 Active First Notice $518.73 5724 CODE AVE EDINA MN 55436-2461 Active No Collection Activity $517.64 4437 ELLSWORTH DR EDINA MN 55435-4149 Active First Notice $516.35 7313 SCHEY DR EDINA MN 55439-1757 Active No Collection Activity $510.99 7133 GLOUCHESTER AVE EDINA MN 55435-4113 Active No Collection Activity $500.57 6817 NORMANDALE RD EDINA MN 55435-1542 Active First Notice $500.57 5615 TRACY AVE EDINA MN 55436-2232 Active First Notice $499.53 5836 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2832 Active First Notice $497.72 4012 INGLEWOOD AVE EDINA MN 55416-5040 Active First Notice $497.57 5721 OLINGER RD EDINA MN 55436-1945 Active No Collection Activity $497.31 5808 CRESCENT TER EDINA MN 55436-1319 Active First Notice $496.49 6516 CREEK DR EDINA MN 55439-1208 Active First Notice $494.88 4209 MORNINGSIDE RD EDINA MN 55416-5029 Finalled First Notice $494.38 5804 SCHAEFER RD EDINA MN 55436-1116 Active First Notice $494.17 5628 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2637 Active First Notice $492.14 5140 HANKERSON AVE EDINA MN 55436 Active No Collection Activity $490.21 7326 CORNELIA DR EDINA MN 55435-4162 Active First Notice $482.09 5538 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1036 Active No Collection Activity $478.85 4505 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424-1135 Active First Notice $478.77 3 EDINA CT EDINA MN 55424-1136 Active First Notice $477.33 4602 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424-1132 Active First Notice $477.09 4377 THIELEN AVE EDINA MN 55436-1522 Active First Notice $474.38 5253 LOCHLOY DR EDINA MN 55436-2023 Active First Notice $473.59 5324 BIRCHCREST DR EDINA MN 55436-2671 Active First Notice $471.29 6117 WESTRIDGE BLVD EDINA MN 55436-2565 Active First Notice $470.32 5801 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1940 Active First Notice $466.91 6600 KENNEY PL EDINA MN 55439-1427 Active First Notice $464.63 5017 HANKERSON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2115 Active No Collection Activity $462.74 6004 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424-1833 Active No Collection Activity $459.73 315 MADISON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8446 Active First Notice $456.79 7208 TRILLIUM LN EDINA MN 55435-4020 Active First Notice $453.24 6220 BRAEBURN CIR EDINA MN 55439-2548 Active No Collection Activity $452.95 6627 LIMERICK DR EDINA MN 55439-1260 Active First Notice $448.95 6736 INDIAN WAY WEST EDINA MN 55439-1000 Active First Notice $447.53 5040 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2441 Active First Notice $446.35 4214 SCOTT TER EDINA MN 55416-5036 Active First Notice $445.80 5555 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439-1952 Active First Notice $444.95 6138 ARCTIC WAY EDINA MN 55436-1806 Active First Notice $442.98 5713 MELODY LN EDINA MN 55436-2416 Active First Notice $442.39 5800 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2402 Active First Notice $442.39 4944 POPPY LN EDINA MN 55435-4013 Active No Collection Activity $440.04 4816 VANDERVORK AVE EDINA MN 55436-1466 Active No Collection Activity $439.79 6028 BERNE CIR EDINA MN 55436-1935 Active No Collection Activity $439.11 5104 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1418 Active No Collection Activity $437.31 5904 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 55436-2667 Active First Notice $436.41 5716 WYCLIFFE RD EDINA MN 55436-2265 Active No Collection Activity $433.85 5527 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439-1951 Active First Notice $433.42 5301 LARADA LN EDINA MN 55436-1084 Active First Notice $430.72 5936 WALNUT DR EDINA MN 55436-1750 Active First Notice $428.64 4505 VANDERVORK AVE EDINA MN 55436-1432 Active First Notice $427.92 4706 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55424-1520 Active First Notice $427.33 5120 KELSEY TERR EDINA MN 55436 Active No Collection Activity $426.62 5536 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424-1537 Active First Notice $425.13 308 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55343-2024 Active First Notice $425.03 5809 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55436-2422 Active No Collection Activity $424.88 417 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55343-8552 Active First Notice $422.18 6412 WARREN AVE EDINA MN 55439-1246 Active First Notice $422.04 6116 BLAKE RIDGE RD EDINA MN 55436-1906 Active No Collection Activity $420.75 4900 BYWOOD WEST EDINA MN 55436-1309 Active No Collection Activity $419.40 4413 70TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-4131 Active First Notice $416.35 6100 EDEN PRAIRIE RD EDINA MN 55436-1204 Active First Notice $416.06 4512 BALFANZ RD EDINA MN 55435-1614 Active First Notice $416.06 7661 WOODVIEW CT EDINA MN 55439-1768 Active First Notice $415.92 322 HARRISON AVE EDINA MN 55343-2033 Active First Notice $415.26 4416 BROOKSIDE AVE EDINA MN 55436-1507 Active First Notice $412.78 5845 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2811 Active No Collection Activity $407.38 5240 EDENMOOR ST EDINA MN 55436-2318 Active First Notice $401.80 5203 GRANDVIEW LN EDINA MN 55436-2113 Active First Notice $400.00 4416 58TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1621 Active No Collection Activity $395.71 5608 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1607 Active First Notice $395.12 5521 CODE AVE EDINA MN 55436-2456 Active First Notice $393.76 5200 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1303 Active No Collection Activity $389.10 6305 MILDRED AVE EDINA MN 55439-1447 Active First Notice $387.21 6212 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2726 Active No Collection Activity $381.07 6412 GLACIER PL EDINA MN 55436-1808 Active First Notice $376.59 6504 NAVAHO TRL EDINA MN 55439-1138 Active First Notice $374.91 5523 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439-1951 Active First Notice $371.24 7616 STONEWOOD CT EDINA MN 55439-2606 Active First Notice $370.92 5525 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436-2028 Active No Collection Activity $369.73 5720 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2346 Finalled No Collection Activity $365.98 5000 SCHAEFER RD EDINA MN 55436-1001 Active First Notice $365.25 4353 OAKDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1071 Active No Collection Activity $358.10 317 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8465 Active First Notice $357.38 6705 WEST TRL EDINA MN 55439-1060 Active First Notice $354.14 5021 VERNON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2102 Active First Notice $351.51 5037 INDIANOLA AVE EDINA MN 55424-1421 Active First Notice $349.54 6324 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1436 Active First Notice $347.51 5321 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1404 Active First Notice $345.16 4509 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55424-1517 Active First Notice $345.16 5224 HOLLYWOOD RD EDINA MN 55436-1423 Active No Collection Activity $343.15 4812 BYWOOD WEST EDINA MN 55436-1307 Active No Collection Activity $342.15 4804 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424-1754 Active First Notice $341.08 3708 57TH ST W EDINA MN 55410-2332 Active No Collection Activity $337.91 7423 COVENTRY WAY EDINA MN 55439-2608 Active First Notice $337.85 9 MERILANE EDINA MN 55436-1335 Active No Collection Activity $337.77 521 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55343-8554 Active First Notice $337.71 4405 44TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1065 Active No Collection Activity $332.30 4219 SCOTT TER EDINA MN 55416-5035 Active No Collection Activity $330.20 6309 PEACEDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1929 Active No Collection Activity $329.25 5517 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1035 Active No Collection Activity $329.14 5300 64TH ST W EDINA MN 55439-1205 Active No Collection Activity $328.40 7400 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55423-3541 Active First Notice $328.15 4609 EDINA BLVD EDINA MN 55424-1154 Active First Notice $322.66 5521 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2466 Active First Notice $322.45 408 MONROE AVE EDINA MN 55343-8456 Active First Notice $320.71 4507 GOLF TER EDINA MN 55424-1510 Active First Notice $319.20 5704 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2405 Active No Collection Activity $317.94 6024 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2859 Active No Collection Activity $317.00 6113 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2753 Active First Notice $316.09 4609 WOODLAND RD W EDINA MN 55424-1554 Active First Notice $314.16 5909 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424-1711 Active No Collection Activity $313.50 4002 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416-5074 Active First Notice $309.40 5120 44TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-1504 Active First Notice $308.26 4351 BROOKSIDE AVE EDINA MN 55436-1547 Active First Notice $305.63 6040 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1829 Active No Collection Activity $303.93 5507 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55424-1528 Active No Collection Activity $303.76 7620 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55423-3545 Active First Notice $302.17 5808 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA MN 55424-1820 Active First Notice $301.90 5840 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2825 Active First Notice $301.43 5217 GRANDVIEW LN EDINA MN 55436-2113 Active First Notice $300.41 5532 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1036 Active First Notice $299.94 4728 WILFORD WAY EDINA MN 55435-1561 Active First Notice $299.94 4390 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1020 Active First Notice $297.75 6404 RED FOX CT EDINA MN 55436-1922 Active First Notice $297.72 5028 JUANITA AVE EDINA MN 55424-1424 Active No Collection Activity $297.46 5019 BRUCE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1319 Active No Collection Activity $297.45 4812 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-1756 Active First Notice $297.35 6608 CAHILL RD EDINA MN 55439-1307 Active No Collection Activity $293.39 5545 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1035 Active First Notice $291.48 5224 EVANSWOOD LN EDINA MN 55436-1133 Active First Notice $290.55 410 JACKSON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8441 Active No Collection Activity $289.56 4625 DREXEL AVE EDINA MN 55424-1133 Active No Collection Activity $289.32 5112 HANKERSON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2118 Active First Notice $289.32 4416 CURVE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1047 Active No Collection Activity $287.40 5304 62ND ST W EDINA MN 55436-2661 Active No Collection Activity $284.28 7730 MARTH CT EDINA MN 55439-2626 Active No Collection Activity $283.01 6200 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2754 Active $282.28 6535 BISSEN CIR EDINA MN 55343-8501 Active No Collection Activity $282.01 7011 LYNMAR LN EDINA MN 55435-4122 Active First Notice $280.57 5532 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2439 Active First Notice $272.77 7135 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55439-1656 Active First Notice $271.64 4821 ASPASIA LN EDINA MN 55435-4066 Active First Notice $270.77 6532 NAVAHO TRL EDINA MN 55439-1138 Active First Notice $270.71 5325 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1310 Active No Collection Activity $270.49 6001 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424-1725 Active First Notice $268.79 4612 58TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1542 Active First Notice $267.71 5117 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2466 Active First Notice $266.67 5213 56TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-2446 Active No Collection Activity $265.95 6513 CREEK DR EDINA MN 55439-1207 Active First Notice $265.02 6317 CONCORD AVE EDINA MN 55424-1739 Active No Collection Activity $264.95 5704 VIEW LN EDINA MN 55436-1121 Active First Notice $262.25 6708 ROSEMARY LN EDINA MN 55439-1148 Active No Collection Activity $260.33 4917 POPPY LN EDINA MN 55435-4012 Active First Notice $257.47 5600 TRACY AVE EDINA MN 55436-2233 Active First Notice $257.23 5901 KILLARNEY LN EDINA MN 55436-1809 Active First Notice $256.48 6024 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2750 Active First Notice $256.42 6025 KILLARNEY LN EDINA MN 55436-1811 Active No Collection Activity $255.61 6205 TRACY AVE EDINA MN 55436-2554 Active First Notice $254.56 6353 ROLF AVE EDINA MN 55439-1434 Active First Notice $253.64 5516 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424-1650 Active First Notice $253.64 5640 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2344 Active First Notice $253.05 5712 CONTINENTAL DR EDINA MN 55436-1708 Active First Notice $250.79 7420 HYDE PARK CIR EDINA MN 55439-1739 Active No Collection Activity $250.75 4407 42ND ST W EDINA MN 55416-5057 Active No Collection Activity $247.80 7105 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439-1821 Active No Collection Activity $247.39 5109 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2442 Active No Collection Activity $244.98 303 VAN BUREN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8477 Active No Collection Activity $244.25 5855 LONG BRAKE TRL EDINA MN 55439-2623 Active First Notice $244.17 6017 LESLEE LN EDINA MN 55436-1212 Active No Collection Activity $241.59 5924 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2736 Active No Collection Activity $241.41 6484 IVY WAY EDINA MN 55436-1664 Active No Collection Activity $241.32 3916 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1202 Active No Collection Activity $240.94 6408 MALONEY AVE EDINA MN 55343-8553 Active No Collection Activity $240.41 6401 TIMBER RIDGE EDINA MN 55439-1056 Active No Collection Activity $238.56 5032 BRUCE PL EDINA MN 55424-1318 Active First Notice $238.04 5928 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2736 Active No Collection Activity $235.71 5136 HANKERSON EDINA MN 55436 Finalled No Collection Activity $235.55 6440 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1438 Active First Notice $235.25 5809 SOUTH DR EDINA MN 55436-2038 Active No Collection Activity $235.24 5521 HALIFAX LN EDINA MN 55424-1440 Active First Notice $234.72 6612 SCANDIA RD EDINA MN 55439-1156 Active First Notice $234.72 5836 DREW AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2760 Active First Notice $233.78 5709 DALE AVE EDINA MN 55436-2470 Active First Notice $231.87 5608 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2656 Active First Notice $231.72 7003 MCCAULEY TRL S EDINA MN 55439-1027 Active First Notice $230.95 5933 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2749 Active No Collection Activity $230.95 7001 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439-1818 Active First Notice $230.95 6432 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1423 Active No Collection Activity $230.02 6704 RIDGEVIEW DR EDINA MN 55439-1416 Active First Notice $229.38 6444 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55423-1039 Finalled First Notice $228.65 401 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8403 Active First Notice $227.73 4521 RUTLEDGE AVE EDINA MN 55436-1418 Active First Notice $227.20 4614 MOORLAND AVE EDINA MN 55424-1159 Active No Collection Activity $226.14 4246 LYNN AVE EDINA MN 55416-5078 Active First Notice $225.80 5820 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424-1701 Active First Notice $224.49 6024 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1829 Finalled No Collection Activity $224.33 5841 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2833 Active First Notice $222.41 6316 LOCH MOOR DR EDINA MN 55439-1620 Active No Collection Activity $219.88 5809 VIEW LN EDINA MN 55436-1122 Active First Notice $219.03 5800 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2832 Active First Notice $218.64 6220 BEARD PL EDINA MN 55410-2718 Active First Notice $218.64 5612 MCGUIRE RD EDINA MN 55439-1345 Active First Notice $218.64 5629 INTERLACHEN CIR EDINA MN 55436-1331 Active First Notice $216.51 5108 HANKERSON AVE EDINA MN 55436-2118 Active First Notice $216.36 4548 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-1368 Active First Notice $215.90 6655 2ND ST S EDINA MN 55343-2068 Active First Notice $215.80 6349 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1437 Active First Notice $215.80 6908 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439-1706 Active First Notice $215.80 5924 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2710 Active First Notice $215.80 6813 SALLY LN EDINA MN 55439-1064 Active First Notice $215.80 6321 LOCH MOOR DR EDINA MN 55439-1621 Active No Collection Activity $215.80 4619 CASCO AVE EDINA MN 55424-1128 Active First Notice $213.65 5801 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2401 Active First Notice $212.95 7708 GLEASON RD EDINA MN 55439-2562 Active No Collection Activity $212.95 6820 CHEYENNE TRL EDINA MN 55439-1157 Active First Notice $212.95 5508 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424-1650 Active First Notice $212.95 5300 MALIBU DR EDINA MN 55436-1032 Active First Notice $212.95 5728 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2342 Active First Notice $212.76 6340 FALCON CT EDINA MN 55436-1902 Active No Collection Activity $211.13 6008 BERNE CIR EDINA MN 55436-1935 Active No Collection Activity $211.02 5009 56TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-2425 Active First Notice $210.94 5520 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436-2037 Active No Collection Activity $210.59 6832 SALLY LN EDINA MN 55439-1047 Active First Notice $210.11 5417 HIGHWOOD DR W EDINA MN 55436-1224 Active First Notice $210.11 417 WASHINGTON AVE S EDINA MN 55343-8403 Active First Notice $207.26 6121 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2725 Active No Collection Activity $207.26 6625 NORDIC DR EDINA MN 55439-1143 Active First Notice $207.26 5161 DANENS DR EDINA MN 55439-1465 Active First Notice $205.89 5613 DALRYMPLE RD EDINA MN 55424-1508 Active First Notice $205.52 4405 MORNINGSIDE RD EDINA MN 55416-5042 Active No Collection Activity $205.38 5929 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2721 Active No Collection Activity $204.41 5321 BLAKE RD S EDINA MN 55436-1129 Active First Notice $204.41 4001 WOOD END DR EDINA MN 55424-1441 Active First Notice $204.41 5625 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2403 Active First Notice $202.81 425 MADISON AVE S EDINA MN 55343-8448 Active First Notice $201.57 411 JACKSON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8440 Active First Notice $201.57 5505 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2462 Active First Notice $201.57 6701 INDIAN HILLS RD EDINA MN 55439-1010 Active No Collection Activity $201.57 5701 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2351 Active First Notice $199.43 5616 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2656 Active First Notice $198.72 6817 HILLSIDE LN EDINA MN 55439-1321 Active First Notice $198.72 5112 ROBERTS PL EDINA MN 55436-2634 Active No Collection Activity $198.72 5829 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2704 Active First Notice $198.72 5316 60TH ST W EDINA MN 55436-2652 Active First Notice $198.72 5329 INTERLACHEN BLVD EDINA MN 55436-1475 Active No Collection Activity $197.39 5009 YVONNE TER EDINA MN 55436-2423 Active No Collection Activity $197.39 6304 VERNON AVE EDINA MN 55436-1819 Active First Notice $195.88 5600 COUNTRYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55436-2506 Active First Notice $195.88 6104 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2724 Active No Collection Activity $195.88 6320 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1916 Active First Notice $195.88 5112 BEDFORD AVE EDINA MN 55436-2112 Active First Notice $194.68 6708 CORNELIA DR EDINA MN 55435-1657 Active First Notice $194.39 6408 LIMERICK LN EDINA MN 55439-1229 Active No Collection Activity $193.03 5920 WALNUT DR EDINA MN 55436-1750 Active No Collection Activity $193.03 6114 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2752 Active No Collection Activity $193.03 5520 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2461 Active First Notice $193.03 6713 SOUTHDALE RD EDINA MN 55435-1652 Active First Notice $192.35 5916 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2826 Active No Collection Activity $190.20 5805 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2858 Active First Notice $190.19 6824 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55435-1627 Active First Notice $190.19 5743 LONG BRAKE CIR EDINA MN 55439-2619 Active First Notice $190.19 5904 WOODDALE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1840 Active First Notice $186.55 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424-1602 Active First Notice $186.55 307 MADISON AVE EDINA MN 55343-8446 Active First Notice $186.14 3922 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1255 Active No Collection Activity $185.39 7 WOODLAND RD EDINA MN 55424-1632 Active First Notice $183.84 4176 44TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1035 Active First Notice $181.80 6816 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55439-1646 Active No Collection Activity $181.65 5817 TRACY AVE EDINA MN 55436-2236 Active First Notice $181.65 7312 WEST SHORE DR EDINA MN 55435-4056 Active No Collection Activity $181.65 5020 RICHMOND DR EDINA MN 55436-2433 Active First Notice $181.13 4512 BROOKSIDE AVE EDINA MN 55436-1508 Active No Collection Activity $180.35 6316 WATERMAN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8570 Active No Collection Activity $177.38 3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY EDINA MN 55435-5923 Active No Collection Activity $176.97 4924 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-1760 Active First Notice $176.57 7209 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439-2632 Active First Notice $176.17 5509 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2302 Active No Collection Activity $173.00 5320 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1305 Active First Notice $170.00 4006 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA MN 55424-1212 Active No Collection Activity $169.21 5512 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436-2018 Active No Collection Activity $168.64 4948 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-1760 Active No Collection Activity $167.22 5134 HANKERSON AVE EDINA MN 55436 Active No Collection Activity $161.89 6133 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424-1909 Finalled No Collection Activity $161.20 5209 MEADOW RIDGE EDINA MN 55439-1412 Active No Collection Activity $160.09 6604 PARKWOOD RD EDINA MN 55436-1042 Active No Collection Activity $159.78 5624 YORK AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2656 Active First Notice $156.13 5429 HALIFAX LN EDINA MN 55424-1438 Active First Notice $155.60 5504 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2439 Active No Collection Activity $153.14 5440 XERXES AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2457 Active No Collection Activity $153.14 4713 TOWNES RD EDINA MN 55424-1237 Active No Collection Activity $153.09 5916 OLINGER BLVD EDINA MN 55436-1959 Active No Collection Activity $150.91 6317 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2757 Active First Notice $150.02 5036 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 55436-2441 Active First Notice $148.14 5728 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2350 Active First Notice $148.10 7451 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55435-4702 Finalled First Notice $147.55 5005 EDINBROOK LN EDINA MN 55436-1540 Active First Notice $146.50 4521 BELVIDERE LN EDINA MN 55435-4033 Active First Notice $145.85 5820 ZENITH AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2832 Active First Notice $144.57 6338 RED FOX LN EDINA MN 55436-1924 Active First Notice $140.64 6516 GLEASON CT EDINA MN 55436-1850 Active No Collection Activity $132.73 5308 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436-2030 Active First Notice $126.27 5501 HALIFAX LN EDINA MN 55424-1440 Finalled No Collection Activity $123.82 5525 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2335 Active $122.03 4250 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424-1931 Active No Collection Activity $118.17 5905 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424-1942 Finalled No Collection Activity $116.23 6420 STAUDER CIR EDINA MN 55436-1045 Finalled First Notice $111.17 6008 ERIN TER EDINA MN 55439-1736 Active First Notice $105.00 5940 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA MN 55424-1710 Active First Notice $104.02 4517 BROOKSIDE TER EDINA MN 55436-1511 Active No Collection Activity $101.25 6433 SHERWOOD AVE EDINA MN 55435-1521 Finalled No Collection Activity $97.23 5505 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424-1641 Active No Collection Activity $96.24 5900 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424-1827 Active No Collection Activity $95.48 6540 NAVAHO TRL EDINA MN 55439-1138 Finalled No Collection Activity $95.45 6300 WATERMAN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8570 Active No Collection Activity $94.38 4512 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MN 55424-1835 Active First Notice $91.53 6737 APACHE RD EDINA MN 55439-1073 Active First Notice $91.31 516 ARTHUR ST EDINA MN 55343-4506 Active No Collection Activity $88.26 6120 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424-1908 Active No Collection Activity $87.27 5720 EWING AVE S EDINA MN 55410-2350 Active No Collection Activity $78.70 4611 ARDEN AVE EDINA MN 55424-1118 Active No Collection Activity $75.80 4507 56TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1556 Active No Collection Activity $75.03 3501 69TH ST W EDINA MN 55435-2536 Finalled No Collection Activity $74.88 5300 BIRCHCREST DR EDINA MN 55436-2671 Active First Notice $70.36 5042 GREEN FARMS RD EDINA MN 55436-1067 Active No Collection Activity $70.25 322 VAN BUREN AVE EDINA MN 55343-8476 Active First Notice $69.92 6620 LIMERICK LN EDINA MN 55439-1326 Active First Notice $68.32 7011 LYNMAR LN EDINA MN 55435-4122 Active First Notice $66.33 6712 WEST SHORE DR EDINA MN 55435-1556 Active First Notice $62.29 6100 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436-2566 Active First Notice $59.97 500 TYLER CT EDINA MN 55343-8428 Active First Notice $58.49 4604 GILFORD DR EDINA MN 55435-4045 Active First Notice $56.52 6432 WEST SHORE DR EDINA MN 55435-1526 Active No Collection Activity $56.10 4630 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410-1752 Active No Collection Activity $55.58 6405 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55439-1439 Active First Notice $51.18 4015 NATCHEZ AVE S EDINA MN 55416-5050 Active First Notice $273.64 4390 MACKEY AVE EDINA MN 55424-1028 Active No Collection Activity $345.96 4366 VERNON AVE S EDINA MN 55436-1524 Active No Collection Activity $187.88 4394 MACKEY AVE EDINA MN 55424-1028 Active No Collection Activity $301.56 4380 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1020 Active First Notice $702.17 4003 NATCHEZ AVE S EDINA MN 55416-5050 Finalled $131.85 4905 44TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 Active No Collection Activity $369.10 4002 MONTEREY AVE S EDINA MN 55416-5047 Active No Collection Activity $395.53 4805 44TH ST W EDINA MN 55424-1006 Active $202.51 4390 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA MN 55424-1020 Active First Notice $895.01 5544 XERXES AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410-2439 $1,490.84 6132 XERXES AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410-2823 $1,020.98 6132 XERXES AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410-2823 $460.89 5628 XERXES AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410-2637 $865.18 5456 Xerxes MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 $591.05 5432 XERXES AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410-2457 $433.31 4612 FRANCE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 $357.00 $477,827.13 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-89 Weed Mowing Special Assessment Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon October 10 and continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: In the summer of 2022, the Parks & Recreation Maintenance division cut the weeds on five properties. T he properties and cost associated with the use of a tractor and staff time to cut the weeds is provided on the attached report. Each cost should be assessed to the property owner for the payment to the City. According to the Edina City Code Chapter 30 Division 2 Maintenance Standards, Sub Section 30-119 Weeds, “Weeds shall be regularly cut or controlled such that no individual plant shall exceed, at any time, ten inches in height or length, as measured from its base at the ground to the tip of each stalk, stem, blade or leaf. Noxious weeds, as defined by the state commissioner of agriculture, shall be eradicated.” ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-89: Weed Mowing Assessment Roll Staff Presentation Weed Mowing RESOLUTION NO. 2022-89 LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. WD-22 WEED MOWING WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Weed Mowing Improvement No. WD-22 – Various Properties with the City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NUMBER OF INSTALLMENTS Weed Mowing WD-22 Levy No. 22034 1 year 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid on or before Nov. 22, 2022 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made on or before Nov. 22. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2022-89 Page Two Adopted this 18th day of October, 2022 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Oct. 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of ___________________, 2022. City Clerk 2022 WEED MOWINGWeed Mowing Assessment RoleOwnerProperty IDAddressHrs. MowedDate MowedAmountAdmin FeeTotal Due6209 Hillside LLC05-116-21-12-00316209 Hillside Rd. 16/27/2022$75.00Different mailing$30.00$105.00Joanne Willmert04-116-21-31-00436630 Normandale Rd. (39)18/8/2022$75.00$30.00$105.00Pontus De Verdier33-117-21-22-00245260 Richwood Dr. (36)19/8/2022$75.00$30.00$105.00Todd Hanson06-116-21-32-00576717 Samuel Rd. (39)17/18/2022$75/hr$30.00$105.00Holder Family Trust19-028-24-14-00465712 Woodland Lane26/27/2022$75/hr Don and Jana HolderDifferent Mailing$30.00$180.00 The CITY of EDINA Weed Mowing Imp. No. WD-22 Resolution No. 2022-89 The CITY of EDINA Weed Mowing Assessment •City Code Chapter 30 Division 2 Maintenance Standards, Sub Section 30-119 Weeds •Weeds shall be regularly cut or controlled such that no individual plant shall exceed, at any time, ten inches (10”) in height or length, as measured from its base at the ground to the tip of each stalk, stem, blade or leaf. Noxious weeds, as defined by the state commissioner of agriculture, shall be eradicated. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA •When weeds exceed 10” in height, Weed Inspector attempts to first reach property owner in person, secondly by phone, lastly by certified letter. •Owner has 10 days to comply. •Park Maintenance staff cut weeds and property is assessed the cost of labor and equipment. •Five (5) different properties in 2022 were cut by Park Maintenance staff. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA Address Amount 6209 Hillside Rd. $105.00 6630 Normandale Rd. $105.00 5260 Richwood Dr. $105.00 6717 Samuel Rd. $105.00 5712 Woodland Lane $180.00 Each property assessment includes a $30.00 administrative fee. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINARequest Assess all five (5) properties for their assigned amount shown above and each for one-year assessments. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-91 Tree Removal Special Assessment Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close the public hearing at noon October 10 and continue on the item to the October 18 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: The attached list of properties collectively had diseased trees that were removed in accordance with City Code Chapter 30, Article IV-Shade Tree Diseases. All property owners were first given an opportunity to remove the diseased tree(s) within a three-week (21 days) period of time. If the tree(s) were not removed within the period of time, the City contracts the removal of the tree(s) and assesses the property owner. The property owners at the addresses attached chose to have the City contract the removal of their tree(s) in 2022 and have the cost of the removal or trimming assessed to their property. This practice prevents the spread of tree diseases or is completed for safety. The guideline used to set the length of the assessment period is: · Under $500 – one year assessment · $500 to under $1,000 – two year assessment · $1,000 and up – three year assessment When the City is requested to (or forced to) contract the removal of a diseased shade tree on a private property, the City Forester asked the property owner if they wish to have the tree stump removed at their expense. State and City law does not demand that tree stumps be removed; only diseased bark must be removed. Minnesota State Statue 18.023 demanded tree stump removal; however, that state law was repealed in 2003. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-91 Tree Removal Assessment Roll Staff Presentation Tree Removal RESOLUTION NO. 2022-91 LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-22 TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Tree Removal Improvement No. TR-22 – Various Properties with the City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Tree Removal TR-22 Levy No. 22030 1 year Tree Removal TR-22 Levy No. 22031 2 years Tree Removal TR-22 Levy No. 22032 3 years 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before Nov. 22, 2022 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made on or before Nov. 22. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2022-91 Page Two Adopted this 18th day October, 2022 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Oct. 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of ___________________, 2022. City Clerk 2022 TREE REMOVALTree Removal Assessment RoleOwnerProperty IDAddress# of TreesDate RemovedAmountAdmin FeeTotal DueUnited States Postal Service08-116-21-14-00087360 W. Bush Lake Rd.2 Ash Trees removed5/7/2022$6,920.00Different mailingStump Grinding5/23/2022$2,720.00Stump Grinding Clean out6/9/2022$3,150.00$30.00$12,820.00Edina Court LLC08-116-21-41-00107401 Bush Lake Rd.1 Ash Tree removed5/5/2022$210.00 Different mailingStump Grinding5/5/2022$90.00$30.00$330.00Michael Mayasich19-028-24-11-01005405 Halifax Lane (24)1 Elm Tree removed7/1/2022$3,800.00$30.00$3,830.00Norman & Debra Mead33-117-21-21-00865032 Kent Ave. (36)2 Elm Trees removed3/10/2022$14,225.00$30.00$14,255.00 The CITY ofEDINA Tree Removal Imp. No. TR-22 Resolution No. 2022-91 The CITY ofEDINATree Removal Imp. #TR-22 Resolution No. 2022-91 •Under City Code Chapter 30, Article IV, Division 2, Section 30-200, The tree inspector finds and controls the spread of diseased trees. •Under City Code Chapter 24, Article II, Section 24-22 (8), Trees must be clear of vegetative growth to a height of 16’ above the curb or edge of street pavement and sidewalks must be clear to a height of 8’. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY ofEDINA •City Forester identifies diseased, improper clearance and public safety trees & notifies homeowner by registered mail (21 days to comply). •Homeowners have the option to remove & dispose of these tree(s) on their own. •Four (4) different properties chose to have the City contract removal or trimming of their trees (6 trees total) in 2022 •City Forester secures quotes from private contractors. •Cost per tree varies greatly depending on size of tree and its location. •City staff does not remove diseased trees from private property. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY ofEDINA Tree Assessment Guideline •Under $500 = one year assessment. •$500 to under $1,000 = two year assessment. •$1,000 and up = three year assessment. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY ofEDINA ADDRESS TREES COST ASSESSMENT •7360 W. Bush Lake Rd.2 $12,820.00 3 years •7401 Bush Lake Rd.1 $330.00 1 year •5405 Halifax Lane 1 $3,830.00 3 years •5032 Kent Ave.2 $14,255.00 3 years Each property assessment includes a $30.00 administrative fee. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY ofEDINA Recommendation •Assess the three (3) properties as stated for their assigned assessment and for the number of years stated. •Hold 5032 Kent Ave. to 2023. •Staff plans to review the current assessment policy, including any overlap of programs available through the City and Hennepin County. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jessica V. Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Manager Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-85 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-22 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon October 10 and to continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: See staff report and presentation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-85: Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment Staff Report: Resolution No. 2022-85 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment Assessment Roll Certificate of Mailing Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2022-85 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Aquatic Vegetation Improvement – Improvement No. AQ-22 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Aquatic Vegetation Improvement Levy No. 22033 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 22 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 22, 2022. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 18th day of October, 2022. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Resolution No. 2022-85 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk October 6, 2022 Mayor and City Council Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Manager PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-85 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-22 Information / Background: The City manages contracts for aeration and aquatic vegetation management services in Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond as requested by groups that are eligible for the service according to section 15.2.2.4 Lake and Pond Management of the 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. These groups agree to pay for the services by special assessment. The 2022 assessment period cover services from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. Arrowhead Lake services include a summer growing season aquatic herbicide to control submerged plants and algae, lake dye, aeration (including electrical service), and associated permits from the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Indianhead Lake services are similar, except for control of summer growing season submerged plants. Instead, the Indianhead Lake Association has opted to encourage native aquatic plants which improves fish habitat, reduces phosphorus that cause algae blooms, and can keep invasive aquatic plants from taking over. Lake Nancy services include an aquatic herbicide to control summer growing season submerged plants and algae, and associated permits from the DNR. Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond services include mechanical removal of aquatic vegetation and associated permits from the DNR. All waterbodies are eligible for City-funded algae treatments and have been credited accordingly. Property IDs and price per REU are shown in the assessment roll. Each of the waterbodies is assessed a $30.00 administrative fee which is shared among the property owners. Each assessment also includes the cost for staff time to coordinate the services. Staff proposes a one-year assessment period for each special assessment, per the City’s Special Assessments Policy. Staff recommends continuing the public hearing until October 10th and considering adopting Special Assessment Resolution No. 2022-85, Improvement AQ-22 on October 18th. PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 06‐116‐21‐24‐0039 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6322 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0038 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6311 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0035 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6432 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0034 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6604 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0031 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6516 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0030 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6512 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0026 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6431 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0025 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6436 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0009 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6520 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0006 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6612 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐24‐0001 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6616 Indian Hills Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0062 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6800 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0061 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6804 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0060 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6429 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0056 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6712 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0029 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6708 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0025 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6720 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0023 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6728 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0015 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6437 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0014 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6433 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0012 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6808 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐23‐0008 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6700 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0057 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6443 Mccauley Ter Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0056 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6320 Post La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0021 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6312 Post La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0020 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6316 Post La Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0017 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6411 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0016 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6416 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0014 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6409 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0013 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6405 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐22‐0012 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6401 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐21‐0116 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6310 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐21‐0115 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6314 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐21‐0114 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6318 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐21‐0069 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6328 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐21‐0068 280.84$              Arrowhead Lake 6327 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0053 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6820 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0049 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6926 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0035 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6817 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0034 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6813 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0033 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6809 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0032 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6805 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0030 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6801 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0018 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6920 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0011 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6800 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0010 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6804 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 06‐116‐21‐43‐0009 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6808 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0008 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6812 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0007 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6816 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0006 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6940 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0005 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6936 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0004 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6932 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐43‐0003 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6928 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0042 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6704 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0035 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6624 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0034 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6708 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0027 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6700 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0025 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6620 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0024 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6401 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0023 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6405 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0022 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6409 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0019 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6621 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0018 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6625 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐42‐0017 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6629 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐34‐0060 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6909 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐34‐0059 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6905 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐34‐0058 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6901 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐31‐0003 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6613 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06‐116‐21‐31‐0002 483.00$              Indianhead Lake 6617 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 30‐028‐24‐21‐0106 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4509 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0105 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4505 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0069 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6321 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0068 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6317 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0067 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6313 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0066 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6309 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0065 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6305 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0031 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4500 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0030 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4504 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0028 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6333 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0027 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6329 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0023 87.22$                Lake Nancy 6324 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0022 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4521 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0020 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4517 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0019 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4513 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0018 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4509 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0017 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4505 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0016 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4501 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0015 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4500 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 30‐028‐24‐21‐0010 87.22$                Lake Nancy 4501 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0003 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Woodhill Way Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0002 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0082 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 18‐028‐24‐22‐0081 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐21‐0040 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4513 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐21‐0039 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4511 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐21‐0038 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4509 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐21‐0037 124.13$              Mill Pond 1/3 4507 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0045 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4832 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0044 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4828 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0043 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4824 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0042 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4820 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0091 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4812 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0090 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0089 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0078 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4911 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0077 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4909 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0076 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4907 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0075 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4905 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0074 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4903 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0073 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4901 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0072 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4807 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0071 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4805 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0070 248.25$              Mill Pond 2/3 4801 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐31‐0002 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4933 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0085 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4640 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0084 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4638 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0083 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4634 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0082 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4630 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0081 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4626 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0077 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4612 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0076 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4610 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0075 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4604 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0074 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4602 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐24‐0073 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4600 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0060 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4929 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0059 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4925 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0058 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4622 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0057 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4618 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0056 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4614 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0055 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4520 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0052 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4907 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0051 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4905 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0023 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4921 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0022 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0021 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0020 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐23‐0019 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4901 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0093 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4506 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 18‐028‐24‐22‐0088 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0087 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4801 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0085 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0079 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4518 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0069 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4707 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0068 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4705 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0067 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4703 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0066 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4701 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0065 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4605 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0064 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4603 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0063 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4601 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18‐028‐24‐22‐0060 376.14$              Mill Pond 3/3 4504 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 15, 2022, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Aquatic Vegetation (Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Mill Pond) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 21 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 15th day of Sept. 2022. ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Arrowhead Lake: Current Owner «Address_1» «Address_2» Property ID «PID» «Lake» IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-22: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2021 was $10,110.24. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $280.84. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 22, 2022. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2023 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 18, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 Page 2 of 2 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Indianhead Lake: Current Owner 6405 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 Property ID 611621420023 Indianhead Lake IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-22: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2021 was $15,939.00. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $483.00. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 22, 2022. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2023 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 18, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 Page 2 of 2 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Mill Pond: Current Owner 4800 Woodhill Way Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 1802824230003 Mill Pond 1/3 IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-22: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2021 was $18,882.22. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $124.13. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 22, 2022. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2023 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 18, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 Page 2 of 2 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Mill Pond: Current Owner 4901 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 1802824220073 Mill Pond 2/3 IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-22: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2021 was $18,882.22. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $248.25. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 22, 2022. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2023 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 18, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 Page 2 of 2 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Mill Pond: Current Owner 4701 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 1802824220066 Mill Pond 3/3 IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-22: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2021 was $18,882.22. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $376.14. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 22, 2022. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2023 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 18, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 Page 2 of 2 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Lake Nancy: Current Owner 4505 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 3002824210105 Lake Nancy IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-22: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2021 was $1,744.40. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $87.22. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 22, 2022. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2023 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 18, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 Page 2 of 2 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 611621230056 Arrowhead Lake 6712 Arrowhead Pass 6712 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 611621230029 Arrowhead Lake 6708 Arrowhead Pass 6708 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 611621240001 Arrowhead Lake 6616 Indian Hills Cir 6616 Indian Hills Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621240031 Arrowhead Lake 6516 Indian Hills Rd 6516 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240009 Arrowhead Lake 6520 Indian Hills Rd 6520 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230023 Arrowhead Lake 6728 Indian Hills Rd 6728 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230062 Arrowhead Lake 6800 Indian Hills Rd 6800 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230061 Arrowhead Lake 6804 Indian Hills Rd 6804 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240034 Arrowhead Lake 6604 Indian Hills Rd 6604 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240030 Arrowhead Lake 6512 Indian Hills Rd 6512 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240006 Arrowhead Lake 6612 Indian Hills Rd 6612 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230025 Arrowhead Lake 6720 Indian Hills Rd 6720 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230008 Arrowhead Lake 6700 Indian Hills Rd 6700 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230012 Arrowhead Lake 6808 Margarets La 6808 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621230060 Arrowhead Lake 6429 Margarets La 6429 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621230015 Arrowhead Lake 6437 Margarets La 6437 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621230014 Arrowhead Lake 6433 Margarets La 6433 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621220017 Arrowhead Lake 6411 McCauley Cir 6411 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220016 Arrowhead Lake 6416 McCauley Cir 6416 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220012 Arrowhead Lake 6401 McCauley Cir 6401 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220014 Arrowhead Lake 6409 McCauley Cir 6409 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220013 Arrowhead Lake 6405 McCauley Cir 6405 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220057 Arrowhead Lake 6443 McCauley Ter 6443 Mccauley Ter Edina, MN 55439 611621210114 Arrowhead Lake 6318 McIntyre Pt 6318 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621240038 Arrowhead Lake 6311 McIntyre Pt 501 Nebraska Ave Breckenridge, MN 56520 611621210115 Arrowhead Lake 6314 McIntyre Pt 6314 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621210116 Arrowhead Lake 6310 McIntyre Pt 6310 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621240039 Arrowhead Lake 6322 McIntyre Pt 6322 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621220021 Arrowhead Lake 6312 Post La 6312 Post La Edina, MN 55439 611621220056 Arrowhead Lake 6320 Post La 6320 Post La Edina, MN 55439 611621220020 Arrowhead Lake 6316 Post La 6316 Post La Edina, MN 55439 611621240035 Arrowhead Lake 6432 Timber Ridge 6432 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 611621240026 Arrowhead Lake 6431 Timber Ridge 6431 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 611621240025 Arrowhead Lake 6436 Timber Ridge 6436 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 611621210069 Arrowhead Lake 6328 Timber Tr 6328 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621210068 Arrowhead Lake 6327 Timber Tr 6327 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 611621420023 Indianhead Lake 6405 Indian Hills Rd 6405 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621420034 Indianhead Lake 6708 Cheyenne Tr 6708 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430010 Indianhead Lake 6804 Cheyenne Tr 6804 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420018 Indianhead Lake 6625 Dakota Tr 6625 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430053 Indianhead Lake 6820 Cheyenne Cir 6820 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621340060 Indianhead Lake 6909 Dakota Tr 6909 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430033 Indianhead Lake 6809 Dakota Tr 6809 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621310002 Indianhead Lake 6617 Dakota Tr 6617 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420024 Indianhead Lake 6401 Indian Hills Rd 6401 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621420022 Indianhead Lake 6409 Indian Hills Rd 6409 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621310003 Indianhead Lake 6613 Dakota Tr 6613 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621340059 Indianhead Lake 6905 Dakota Tr 6905 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430005 Indianhead Lake 6936 Valley View Rd 6936 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621420019 Indianhead Lake 6621 Dakota Tr 6621 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430004 Indianhead Lake 6932 Valley View Rd 6932 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430011 Indianhead Lake 6800 Cheyenne Tr 6800 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420017 Indianhead Lake 6629 Dakota Tr 6629 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430032 Indianhead Lake 6805 Dakota Tr 6805 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430008 Indianhead Lake 6812 Cheyenne Cir 6812 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621430049 Indianhead Lake 6926 Valley View Rd 6926 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430009 Indianhead Lake 6808 Cheyenne Tr 6808 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420035 Indianhead Lake 6624 Cheyenne Tr 6624 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430006 Indianhead Lake 6940 Valley View Rd 6940 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430035 Indianhead Lake 6817 Dakota Tr 6817 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621340058 Indianhead Lake 6901 Dakota Tr 6901 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420042 Indianhead Lake 6704 Cheyenne Tr 6704 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420025 Indianhead Lake 6620 Cheyenne Tr 6620 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420027 Indianhead Lake 6700 Cheyenne Tr 6700 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430030 Indianhead Lake 6801 Dakota Tr 6801 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430007 Indianhead Lake 6816 Cheyenne Cir 6816 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621430003 Indianhead Lake 6928 Valley View Rd 6928 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430034 Indianhead Lake 6813 Dakota Tr 6813 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430018 Indianhead Lake 6920 Valley View Rd 6920 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 1802824230003 Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Woodhill Way 4800 Woodhill Way Edina, MN 55424 1802824220082 Mill Pond 1/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824210038 Mill Pond 1/3 4509 Browndale Ave 4509 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220081 Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd E 4800 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824210040 Mill Pond 1/3 4513 Browndale Ave 4513 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824210037 Mill Pond 1/3 4507 Browndale Ave 4507 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824230002 Mill Pond 1/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd E 4808 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824210039 Mill Pond 1/3 4511 Browndale Ave 4511 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 1802824220073 Mill Pond 2/3 4901 Sunnyside Rd 4901 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220076 Mill Pond 2/3 4907 Sunnyside Rd 4907 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220074 Mill Pond 2/3 4903 Sunnyside Rd 4903 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220071 Mill Pond 2/3 4805 Sunnyside Rd 4805 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220089 Mill Pond 2/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824230045 Mill Pond 2/3 4832 Sunnyslope Rd W 4832 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824230043 Mill Pond 2/3 4824 Sunnyslope Rd W 4824 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220091 Mill Pond 2/3 4812 Sunnyslope Rd W 4812 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220090 Mill Pond 2/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220072 Mill Pond 2/3 4807 Sunnyside Rd 4807 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220078 Mill Pond 2/3 4911 Sunnyside Rd 4911 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220077 Mill Pond 2/3 4909 Sunnyside Rd 4909 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230042 Mill Pond 2/3 4820 Sunnyslope Rd W 4820 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220075 Mill Pond 2/3 4905 Sunnyside Rd 4905 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230044 Mill Pond 2/3 4828 Sunnyslope Rd W 4828 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220070 Mill Pond 2/3 4801 Sunnyside Rd 4801 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 1802824220066 Mill Pond 3/3 4701 Sunnyside Rd 4701 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230055 Mill Pond 3/3 4520 Browndale Ave 4520 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824240073 Mill Pond 3/3 4600 Browndale Ave 4600 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220063 Mill Pond 3/3 4601 Sunnyside Rd 4601 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824240076 Mill Pond 3/3 4610 Browndale Ave 4610 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824230058 Mill Pond 3/3 4622 Edgebrook Pl 4622 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220088 Mill Pond 3/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd W 4800 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220085 Mill Pond 3/3 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230020 Mill Pond 3/3 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240074 Mill Pond 3/3 4602 Browndale Ave 4602 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824240077 Mill Pond 3/3 4612 Edgebrook Pl 4612 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220067 Mill Pond 3/3 4703 Sunnyside Rd 4703 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230059 Mill Pond 3/3 4925 Sunnyslope Rd E 4925 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230056 Mill Pond 3/3 4614 Edgebrook Pl 4614 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230021 Mill Pond 3/3 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240083 Mill Pond 3/3 4634 Edgebrook Pl 4634 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230057 Mill Pond 3/3 4618 Edgebrook Pl 4618 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824240085 Mill Pond 3/3 4640 Edgebrook Pl 4640 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230052 Mill Pond 3/3 4907 Sunnyslope Rd E 4907 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240075 Mill Pond 3/3 4604 Browndale Ave 4604 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220065 Mill Pond 3/3 4605 Sunnyside Rd 4605 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220068 Mill Pond 3/3 4705 Sunnyside Rd 4705 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220060 Mill Pond 3/3 4504 Browndale Ave 4504 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220064 Mill Pond 3/3 4603 Sunnyside Rd 4603 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220087 Mill Pond 3/3 4801 Sunnyslope Rd E 4801 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824310002 Mill Pond 3/3 4933 Sunnyslope Rd E 4933 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240084 Mill Pond 3/3 4638 Edgebrook Pl 4638 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230019 Mill Pond 3/3 4901 Sunnyslope Rd E 4901 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230060 Mill Pond 3/3 4929 Sunnyslope Rd E 4929 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824220069 Mill Pond 3/3 4707 Sunnyside Rd 4707 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230051 Mill Pond 3/3 4905 Sunnyslope Rd E 4905 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240081 Mill Pond 3/3 4626 Edgebrook Pl 4626 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220079 Mill Pond 3/3 4518 Browndale Ave 4518 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824230022 Mill Pond 3/3 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230023 Mill Pond 3/3 4921 Sunnyslope Rd E 4921 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240082 Mill Pond 3/3 4630 Edgebrook Pl 4630 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220093 Mill Pond 3/3 4506 Browndale Ave 4506 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 3002824210105 Lake Nancy 4505 Nancy La 4505 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210067 Lake Nancy 6313 St Johns Ave 6313 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 3002824210106 Lake Nancy 4509 Nancy La 4509 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210020 Lake Nancy 4517 Garrison La 4517 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210031 Lake Nancy 4500 64Th St W 4500 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 3002824210016 Lake Nancy 4501 Garrison La 4501 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210019 Lake Nancy 4513 Garrison La 4513 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210018 Lake Nancy 4509 Garrison La 4509 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210068 Lake Nancy 6317 St Johns Ave 6317 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 3002824210015 Lake Nancy 4500 Nancy La 4500 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210027 Lake Nancy 6329 Millers La 6329 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210023 Lake Nancy 6324 Millers La 6324 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210022 Lake Nancy 4521 Garrison La 4521 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210030 Lake Nancy 4504 64Th St W 4504 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 3002824210066 Lake Nancy 6309 St Johns Ave 6309 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 3002824210017 Lake Nancy 4505 Garrison La 4505 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210069 Lake Nancy 6321 St Johns Ave 6321 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 3002824210065 Lake Nancy 6305 St Johns Ave 6305 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 3002824210010 Lake Nancy 4501 Nancy La 4501 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210028 Lake Nancy 6333 Millers La 6333 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 The CITY ofEDINA Aquatic Vegetation Improvement No. AQ-22 Resolution No. 2022-85 October 6, 2022 The CITY ofEDINAAquatic Vegetation Management •City-coordinated aquatic vegetation management service. •This is a service requested by homeowners. It is not required by the City or MN Department of Natural Resources. •Aquatic vegetation management is guided by section 15.2.2.4 Lake and Pond Management of the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. Per the policy, the City pays for algae treatments in eligible waterbodies. •Action on public hearing for annual special assessment for aquatic vegetation management services. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY ofEDINA 36 assessable units. Arrowhead Lake Association incorporated September 2015. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY ofEDINA 33 assessable units. The Indianhead Lake Association incorporated in May 2016. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY ofEDINA 20 assessable units. The Lake Nancy Lake Association incorporated in February 2016. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The Mill Pond Association incorporated in 2022. The CITY ofEDINA Arrowhead Lake 36 at 1.0 REU = $280.84 each Indianhead Lake 33 at 1.0 REU = $483.00 each Lake Nancy 20 at 1.0 REU = $87.22 each Mill Pond 37 at 1.0 REU = $376.14 each 16 at 0.66 REU = $248.25 each 8 at 0.33 REU = $124.13 each •Continue public hearing until October 10th. •Consider adopting Special Assessment Resolution No. 2022-85, Improvement AQ -22 on October 18th. Staff Recommendation www.EdinaMN.gov 7 One-year assessment. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-86 Creek Knoll A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-459 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close the public hearing at noon October 10 and continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council Meeting. INTRODUCTION: A project area map is attached showing all the streets that were reconstructed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-86 Creek Knoll A & B Assessment Roll Certficate of Mailing Project Area Map Creek Knoll A & B Survey Responses RESOLUTION NO. 2022-86 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Creek Knoll A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction – Improvement No. BA-459 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 2.68% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Creek Knoll A & B Levy No. 22037 15 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 22 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 22, 2022. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 18th day of October, 2022. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Resolution No. 2022-86 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk CREEK KNOLL A B STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 459FINAL ASSESSMENTPID Owner House No Street Assessable REU Roadway Assessable Amount20‐028‐24‐21‐0139 CAROLYN & JAMES WILSON 3225 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0134 S E & J M BASSETT3301 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0113 MICHAEL C & TERESA M FORD 3501 54TH ST W 1.6 $14,533.47 $14,533.4720‐028‐24‐22‐0114 JACQUELINE NOBLE 3509 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0016 B M MURPHY & S T MURPHY 3513 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0017 BENJAMIN & BRITTANY PEARSON 3517 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0018 D MERRILL & A M MERRILL 3525 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0019 R A ADERHOLD & A L KINGSTROM 3529 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0025 MARK & SUSAN JORDAN 3605 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0026 NANCY CROCKER TTE 3609 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0027 SANDRO & LEYLA GAROFALO 3617 54TH ST W 1.6 $14,533.47 $14,533.4720‐028‐24‐22‐0034 BENJAMIN GRAHAM/ERICA GRAHAM 3701 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0035 CARA L GRAHAM 3709 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0036 MAXIMILIAN & ANN HEITZMANN 3713 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0037 J P HANEL & R M HANEL 3725 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0038 ALBERT J PAWLICKI 3729 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0042 PATRICIA M MORAN 3801 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0043 A T FORREST & B A FORREST 3805 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0044 F W ENDORF & N K ENDORF 3809 54TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0057 K E & M L ZANDER 3500 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0058 T & D UHLEMANN 3504 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0109 MEGAN M WALSH REVOCABLE TRST 3505 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0059 MEGAN & RYAN FLYNN 3508 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0093 M HOFF & A HENNINGTON 3509 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0108 E T MICHAEL & J C HILLGER 3511 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0060 ANNA K CHERNAKOVA 3512 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0061 P KILLEN & C KILLEN 3516 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0062 J PALMER & A PALMER 3600 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0087 DOUGLAS ROSE & ERICA BERGLAND 3601 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0095 DOUGLAS ROSE 3601 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0063 RYAN SOMERS/KEVLYN M SOMERS 3604 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0088 M S DANAHY & F K DANAHY 3605 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0064 KURT GEARHART & MEGAN ZIMMER 3608 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0112 STEFAN & LONNIE HELGESON 3609 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0065 DAVID GERLACH 3612 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0117 R J PREUSS & M A O'DELL 3613 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0066 N O PREUSS & M B LI 3616 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0091 ELLEN BENDEL‐STENZEL 3617 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0067 AMY & JEREMY THOMPSON 3700 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.42 CREEK KNOLL A B STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 459FINAL ASSESSMENT20‐028‐24‐22‐0081 J & C DIECKHAUS 3701 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0068 A W & A K LANG/S KUNAMNENI 3704 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0082 J & B SKOVBROTEN 3705 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0069 D A LARSON & H A LARSON 3708 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0083 STEVEN & GAIL MOLL 3709 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0070 ARDELLE A BARR 3712 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0071 R & G HABEN 3800 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0084 JOAN T O'BRIEN 3801 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0072 S T & J M FLEMING 3808 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0102 EVAN WILLIAMS 3809 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0073 MICHELLE A JESSE 3812 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0074 NANCY MORTON 3816 55TH ST W 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0075 ARLEEN J STANEK 3820 55TH ST W 0.5 $4,541.71 $4,541.7120‐028‐24‐21‐0084 JOSEPH MAYETLE 5400 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0093 DOUGLAS HOSTNICK ET AL 5401 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0085 BRIDGET & CHARLES POLLAK 5402 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0094 MICHELE MARIE VERSLUIS 5403 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0086 MARY JILL STRICKER REV TR 5404 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0095 TRENT G BLAIN 5405 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0087 CRAIG PARTIN & MARK STRONG 5406 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0096 S D SCHELP & M T SCHELP 5407 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0088 M B PLITNICK & P J GENEREUX 5408 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0097 BONNIE LUKE & BRAD HOKANSON 5409 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0089 CRISTOPHER & JULIA CALEF 5410 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0099 KATHLEEN & MATTHEW KRAMER 5411 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0098 JOHN KLOS & PATRICIA VALUSEK 5413 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0100 JAMES COUSINS/ANGELA COUSINS 5415 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0101 SHANE C VAIL 5417 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0102 G A STUECK & N MYERS 5419 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0103 J RICHARD & BEVERLY BAKER 5421 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0142 KENNON JAEGER 5423 ABBOTT PL 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0092 D M WALSH & J E WALSH 5401 BEARD AVE S 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0091 AMY BARGER 5405 BEARD AVE S 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0090 RYAN T & LAUREN A PETERSON 5409 BEARD AVE S 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0141 BRIAN HIGGINS/MISTY HIGGINS 5501 BEARD CT 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0002 S M GAROFALO & L T GARAOFALO 5505 BEARD CT 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐21‐0003 MAX HOOKER & ANN VOGL 5509 BEARD CT 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0115 KIMBERLY GESSERT 5401 DREW AVE S 0.8 $7,266.74 $7,266.7420‐028‐24‐22‐0116 D D REMBOLDT & C REMBOLDT 5403 DREW AVE S 0.8 $7,266.74 $7,266.7420‐028‐24‐22‐0106 M A HELFER & T HELFER 5501 EWING CIR 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.42 CREEK KNOLL A B STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 459FINAL ASSESSMENT20‐028‐24‐22‐0103YVONNE J STAUBUS TRUSTEE5504 EWING CIR 0.8 $7,266.74 $7,266.7420‐028‐24‐22‐0105 DOUGLAS & KATHRYN PETERSON 5505 EWING CIR 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0110 JAMES M WATERS 5512 EWING CIR 0.4 $3,633.37 $3,633.3720‐028‐24‐22‐0111 DIANE BETTINI 5516 EWING CIR 0.4 $3,633.37 $3,633.3720‐028‐24‐22‐0045 NORTHERN TIER RETAIL LLC 5401 FRANCE AVE S 2.91 $26,432.75 $26,432.7520‐028‐24‐22‐0039 ST PETERS LUTH CH 5421 FRANCE AVE S 4.46 $40,512.05 $40,512.0520‐028‐24‐22‐0005 ST PETERS EVAN LUTH CHURCH 5425 FRANCE AVE S 0 $0,000.00 $0,000.0020‐028‐24‐22‐0080 CONNECT PROPERTIES, LLC 3817 55TH ST W 0.5 $4,541.71 $4,541.7120‐028‐24‐22‐0024 DANIEL & DONNA UTTER ETAL TR 3500 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0056 M T & M A WURST 3501 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0023 KEVIN & ELIZABETH HEIDENREICH 3504 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0055 A G EVELOFF & K G EVELOFF 3505 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0054 JENNIFER L SCHIEGG TRUST 3509 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0022 DANIEL & ALYSON VAN DYK 3512 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0021 F VERDESOTO & L CAMACHO 3516 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0053 KATIE S KLOSTER 3517 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0052 W M & E J RUMPZA 3521 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0051 BRENNAN WEBER 3525 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0050 JULIE THIELMAN 3531 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0049 T H O'NEILL & A K O'NEILL 3537 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0048 KIMBERLY ANN COUGHLEN STUART 3541 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0020 RACHEL PILLIOD & BRIAN FOBI 3600 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0033 NANCY J HAYS TRUST 3604 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0107 K D PALMSTEIN/T T PALMSTEIN 3616 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0030 HANS HANSEN 3620 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0029 M R BROCKMAN & W J BROCKMAN 3624 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0041 ST PETER'S EVANG LUTHERAN CH 3700 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0047 MATTHEW A FOX & THUY ANH FOX 3701 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0040 ST PETERS EVANG LUTHERAN CH 3704 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0046 T SCHUBERT/JAY JEFFREY SMITH 3705 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0001 GREGORY & HEATHER MAY 3709 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0002 W B OGDEN & P L OGDEN 3713 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0003 J R O'NEILL & A M O'NEILL 3717 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.4220‐028‐24‐22‐0004 ST PETERS EVANG LUTH CHURCH 3721 FULLER ST 1 $9,083.42 $9,083.42 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 15, 2022, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Creek Knoll A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. BA-459 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 21 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 15th day of Sept. 2022. ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-459 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thurs., Oct. 6, 2022, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the Creek Knoll A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction: Property Identification No. 20-028-24-21-0139 The special assessment to this property for roadway reconstruction is $9,083.42. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $1,051,587.53. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. Payment Options The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years at the rate of 2.68 percent. Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the Oct. 6 meeting, you may pay the assessment in one of these ways: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest payable to the City of Edina and mail check to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 22, 2022. 2. Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment payable to the City of Edina and mail check to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 22, 2022. The remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2023, with interest on the remaining assessment at the rate of 2.68 percent per annum from Oct. 18, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2023. 3. Pay the assessment with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid in the Assessing Office by Nov. 22, 2022, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2023, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 2.68 percent per annum from Oct. 18, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2023. Deferment The City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for a homestead property owned 2 by a person age 65 or older, one retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability, or a member of the National Guard or other reserves ordered to active military service for whom it would be a hardship to make payments. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor’s Office by Nov. 15, 2022. Contact Jamie Ericksen at 952-826-0424 or JEricksen@EdinaMN.gov to learn the procedures to apply for deferment and make arrangements to file your application by calling. Below is an example of your annual payment over 15 years (principal plus interest). Payments are amortized using a level annual payment schedule. Sample Total Assessment Sample Annual Payment (Principal + Interest) $9,083.42 $743.38 $11,711.51 $958.47 Objection and/or Appeal to the Assessment 1. If you wish to object to the amount of your assessment, email a signed, written objection to the City Clerk, sallison@EdinaMN.gov, before the assessment public hearing. 2. Per Minn. Stat. § 429.081, you may appeal the amount of your assessment to district court by serving notice of the appeal to the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days after the assessment amount is adopted at the assessment public hearing and file the same notice with the district court within 10 days after the notice was served to the Mayor or the City Clerk. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. To comment on the special assessment, you may: • Write to City of Edina, Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439. • Email to mail@EdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Engineering. • Attend the Oct 6th City Council Meeting, watch the public hearing online or on Edina TV and call in to offer comments, leave a voicemail in advance or submit your comments online. Ways to participate are included in this mailing. If you have questions regarding the project, please call the Engineering Department at 952-826-0371. If you have questions about paying your assessment, please call the Assessing Division at 952-826-0365. September 15, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk 3 Cut the bottom section and mail in with your payment if paying on or before Nov. 22, 2022: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PAYMENT PROCEDURE • If paying on or before Nov. 22, 2022, please cut and return this stub with your payment. • Make check payable to the City of Edina. • Mail payment: City of Edina, Assessing Division, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. PID Impr. No. Pay this total amount by Nov. 22, 2022, to avoid future interest charges. If not paid on or before Nov. 22, 2022, the assessment will be placed on your property taxes at 2.68 percent annual interest rate, spread out over 15 years. 20-028-24-21-0139 BA-459 $9,083.42 Amount Enclosed: Name: 4 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. PID Owner MAIL TO CITY STATE ZIP20‐028‐24‐21‐0139 CAROLYN & JAMES WILSON 3225 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0134 S E & J M BASSETT 3301 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0113 MICHAEL C & TERESA M FORD 3501 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0114 JACQUELINE NOBLE 3509 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0016 B M MURPHY & S T MURPHY 3513 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0017 BENJAMIN & BRITTANY PEARSON 3517 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0018 D MERRILL & A M MERRILL 3525 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0019 R A ADERHOLD & A L KINGSTROM 3529 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0025 MARK & SUSAN JORDAN 3605 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0026 NANCY CROCKER TTE 3609 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0027 SANDRO & LEYLA GAROFALO 3617 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0034 BENJAMIN GRAHAM/ERICA GRAHAM 3701 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0035 CARA L GRAHAM 3709 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0036 MAXIMILIAN & ANN HEITZMANN 3713 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0037 J P HANEL & R M HANEL3725 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0038 ALBERT J PAWLICKI 3729 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0042 PATRICIA M MORAN 3801 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0043 A T FORREST & B A FORREST 440 W 50TH ST EDINA MN 5542420‐028‐24‐22‐0044 F W ENDORF & N K ENDORF 3809 54TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0057 K E & M L ZANDER 3500 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0058 T & D UHLEMANN 3504 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0109 MEGAN M WALSH REVOCABLE TRST 3505 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0059 MEGAN & RYAN FLYNN 3508 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0093 M HOFF & A HENNINGTON 3509 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0108 E T MICHAEL & J C HILLGER 3511 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0060 ANNA K CHERNAKOVA 3512 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0061 P KILLEN & C KILLEN 3516 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0062 J PALMER & A PALMER 3600 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0087 DOUGLAS ROSE & ERICA BERGLAND 3601 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0095 DOUGLAS ROSE 3601 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0063 RYAN SOMERS/KEVLYN M SOMERS 3604 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0088 M S DANAHY & F K DANAHY 3605 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0064 KURT GEARHART & MEGAN ZIMMER 3608 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0112 STEFAN & LONNIE HELGESON 3609 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0065 DAVID GERLACH 3612 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0117 R J PREUSS & M A O'DELL 3613 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0066 N O PREUSS & M B LI 3616 55TH ST W EDINA MN 55410 20‐028‐24‐22‐0091 ELLEN BENDEL‐STENZEL3617 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0067 AMY & JEREMY THOMPSON 3700 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0081 J & C DIECKHAUS 3701 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0068 A W & A K LANG/S KUNAMNENI 3704 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0082 J & B SKOVBROTEN 3705 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0069 D A LARSON & H A LARSON 3708 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0083 STEVEN & GAIL MOLL 3709 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0070 ARDELLE A BARR 3712 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0071 R & G HABEN 3800 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0084 JOAN T O'BRIEN 3801 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0072 S T & J M FLEMING 3808 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0102 EVAN WILLIAMS 3809 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0073 MICHELLE A JESSE 3812 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0074 NANCY MORTON 3816 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0075 ARLEEN J STANEK 3820 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0084 JOSEPH MAYETLE 5400 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0093 DOUGLAS HOSTNICK ET AL 5401 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0085 BRIDGET & CHARLES POLLAK 5402 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0094 MICHELE MARIE VERSLUIS 5403 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0086 MARY JILL STRICKER REV TR 5404 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0095 TRENT G BLAIN 5405 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0087 CRAIG PARTIN & MARK STRONG 5406 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0096 S D SCHELP & M T SCHELP 5407 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0088 M B PLITNICK & P J GENEREUX 5408 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0097 BONNIE LUKE & BRAD HOKANSON 5409 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0089 CRISTOPHER & JULIA CALEF 5410 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0099 KATHLEEN & MATTHEW KRAMER 5411 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0098 JOHN KLOS & PATRICIA VALUSEK 5413 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0100 JAMES COUSINS/ANGELA COUSINS 5415 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0101 SHANE C VAIL 5417 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0102 G A STUECK & N MYERS 5419 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0103 J RICHARD & BEVERLY BAKER 5421 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0142 KENNON JAEGER 5423 ABBOTT PL EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0092 D M WALSH & J E WALSH 5401 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0091 AMY BARGER 5405 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0090 RYAN T & LAUREN A PETERSON 5409 BEARD AVE S EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0141 BRIAN HIGGINS/MISTY HIGGINS 5501 BEARD CT EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐21‐0002 S M GAROFALO & L T GARAOFALO 5505 BEARD CT EDINA MN 55410 20‐028‐24‐21‐0003 MAX HOOKER & ANN VOGL 5509 BEARD CT EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0115 KIMBERLY GESSERT 5401 DREW AVE S EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0116 D D REMBOLDT & C REMBOLDT 5403 DREW AVE S EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0106 M A HELFER & T HELFER 5501 EWING CIR EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0103 YVONNE J STAUBUS TRUSTEE 5504 EWING CIR EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0105 DOUGLAS & KATHRYN PETERSON 5505 EWING CIR EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0110 JAMES M WATERS 5512 EWING CIR EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0111 DIANE BETTINI 5516 EWING CIR EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0045 NORTHERN TIER RETAIL LLC ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENTPO BOX 59289 SAN ANTONIO TX 7825920‐028‐24‐22‐0039 ST PETERS LUTH CH 5421 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0005 ST PETERS EVAN LUTH CHURCH 5421 FRANCE AVE EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0080 CONNECT PROPERTIES, LLC 3817 55TH ST W EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0024 DANIEL & DONNA UTTER ETAL TR 3500 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0056 M T & M A WURST 3501 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0023 KEVIN & ELIZABETH HEIDENREICH 3504 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0055 A G EVELOFF & K G EVELOFF 3505 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0054 JENNIFER L SCHIEGG TRUST 3509 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0022 DANIEL & ALYSON VAN DYK 3512 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0021 F VERDESOTO & L CAMACHO 3516 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0053 KATIE S KLOSTER 3517 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0052 W M & E J RUMPZA 3521 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0051 BRENNAN WEBER 3525 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0050 JULIE THIELMAN 3531 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0049 T H O'NEILL & A K O'NEILL 3537 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0048 KIMBERLY ANN COUGHLEN STUART 3541 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0020 RACHEL PILLIOD & BRIAN FOBI 3600 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0033 NANCY J HAYS TRUST 3604 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0107 K D PALMSTEIN/T T PALMSTEIN 3616 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0030 HANS HANSEN 3620 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0029 M R BROCKMAN & W J BROCKMAN 3624 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0041 ST PETER'S EVANG LUTHERAN CH 5421 FRANCE AVE EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0047 MATTHEW A FOX & THUY ANH FOX 3701 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0040 ST PETERS EVANG LUTHERAN CH 5421 FRANCE AVE EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0046 T SCHUBERT/JAY JEFFREY SMITH 3705 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0001 GREGORY & HEATHER MAY 3709 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0002 W B OGDEN & P L OGDEN 3713 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0003 J R O'NEILL & A M O'NEILL 3717 FULLER ST EDINA MN 5541020‐028‐24‐22‐0004 ST PETERS EVANG LUTH CHURCH 3721 FULLER ST EDINA MN 55410 33105421 5330 5411 541535095410 5411 361754245401 3225 5412370133163505 33003320370536055413 5504-08 5522 54195505 36133304370936045440 370435125512 371236083604332455013537 360961 5354 5400 3616382054173511330154215505350954233808330833093601332837045508 55043601362138015508-12 3517333235015500-04 3613-17371336005516 5407 5409 5516-20 3516351236165401 3809 5436 3301 5432 5405 5409 37085408 38125403 550935053529 5402 3709351637003816371354053709 3612360535045406 35003525370535083701350435005404 37213600371737013700351738005401 5528 354135313501352533155400 3521333333213329331733253817 5354 35133509380136093725362038093729380536245501 5425 5401 PROJECT LIMITS W 54TH ST DREW AVEFULLER ST W 55TH ST ABBOTT PLBEARD AVEEWING CIRFRANCE AVEBEARD CTCity of Minneapolis City of Edina / Engineering DeptSeptember 2018 2021 Project AreaCreek Knoll A and B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionCITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA TE D1888 ,e Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 20 September 2022 Project Feedback Form-Creek Knoll Better Together Edina Project: Creek Knoll A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction VISITORS 19 CONTRIBUTORS 17 RESPONSES 18 17 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 18 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Apr 30, 2022 10:53:58 am Last Seen:Apr 30, 2022 17:47:32 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.N/A Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? The project was RUSHED. Why did you wait until Oct/Nov to pave the roads? The road and curb was paved very quickly and does not look great compared to other neighborhoods. Very disappointed with the aesthetics of the roads and curb. Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Apr 30, 2022 12:09:56 pm Last Seen:Apr 30, 2022 19:07:00 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Not at all effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:May 01, 2022 08:32:52 am Last Seen:May 01, 2022 15:25:49 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction The website is confusing and not intuitive. Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Very Effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction The best communication was when workers knockd on my door to apprise me of upcoming outages and when they hung notices on my door knob. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues the PM, Edeena (sp?), and the crew were awesome. everyone was vey nice, took time to answer questions and addressed my concerns. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? I attended the City Councils meeting when the sidewalk addition was discussed. As I recall, there was one person in favor, a 10 year old girl. Everyone else was against it. The work still isn't done. There was a sense that the decision was made and this was an exercise in futility. This experience continues to perpetuate the idea that City Council doesn't listen or care because none of the concerns that were brought up in this meeting were addressed in the final decision. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? On-site face time with the Project Manager and Construction manager was invaluable. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? When do we get the bill? Respondent No:4 Login:Registered Responded At:May 01, 2022 13:05:20 pm Last Seen:May 01, 2022 19:59:24 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction the most important parts are: 1)notification of real/hard start of project and end of project and 2) notification of when you can and can't use your driveway and or use the street. Not sure this was done properly. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I overheard, never experienced myself, Edena had was given flack by her workers and by some neighbors. I always tried to be understanding and reasonable and I found her pleasant and hands on and available and responsive despite the strains put on her by sometimes angry neighbors and difficult underlings on her force. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Procure ALL neighbors cell phones and use a cell phone alert system. I do believe they door knocked a bunch but that is SOOOOO 1980 and a waste of time. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Better communication thru text alerts about timing of EVERYTHING Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Your subs were great. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? It was a royal pain the booboo during the project but I think most of the neighbors are now happy. Road/gutter construction really requires a unique set of skills to pull it off seemlessly. Respondent No:5 Login:Registered Responded At:May 01, 2022 20:29:46 pm Last Seen:May 02, 2022 03:16:54 am City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Somewhat effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction We were not notified in advance of certain activities, including loss of water to home. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded We should not be paying any money for this project. The city no longer requires residents to fund street repairs. We HAVE NOT PAID YET. Why are we paying, but future projects will not request money from residents? Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access No Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? The street pavement leading up to the gutter and driveway cement looks terrible. It is not flush. The blacktop will crumble away for years to come because it is HIGHER than the cement. Ridiculous. And the city wants me to pay for this. If I had hired a contractor I would not pay for such work. Additionally, the grass is awful. The contractor put gravel and rocks in my yard and seeded right over it. I let the city know. First the contractor said they would return last Fall. They never showed. I alerted the city again and hear they will return in May. It should have been done properly the first time. Who puts gravel in a yard and then seeds over the gravel? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop charging residents on a the street for the project. Everyone drives on the street. Why are we paying and we alone? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Edinah is a very kind, very responsive city employee. She was very attentive and provided timely responses. I am disappointed that the city had to take down an 80 year old maple tree because it was planted directly over the water line. I was told the tree roots would be damaged and the tree would probably not survive. Okay, so I understand that and we took it down. It is disappointing that the city cannot pay for a new tree to be planted. I am told that my neighbors are receiving new plants and shrubs. REALLY? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Reverse course on this project that was not well done. Do not charge residents for this. The city has already agreed that all road projects moving forward are not going to be billed to individual households. We have not been billed yet. Why are we being charged? Respondent No:6 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 09:24:33 am Last Seen:May 02, 2022 16:18:26 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences N/A City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction The dates were not consistent and expectations were not managed correctly. It was difficult to plan for many of the interruptions because they either happened too quickly or without communication as to the update. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I thought all of the construction personnel were polite and helpful while navigating the neighborhood. One issue I ran into was when the front lawns were torn up, they did not give us anytime to prepare for mapping sprinklers or to be conscious of what lines they removed and how they needed to go back. Also due to the demolition there were some issues with returning the systems back to their original condition. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:7 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 12:36:57 pm Last Seen:May 02, 2022 19:35:28 pm City Meetings Very Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:8 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 15:25:22 pm Last Seen:May 02, 2022 22:21:29 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences N/A City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Not at all effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Notifications during construction were often nonexistent and important construction items were not discuss with home owners like digging giant holes next to old growth trees instead of 20 feet further down the road Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Actually have the arborist show up. Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues They would listen, but no action or changes would happen Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? meet and change plans based on resident concerns and issues regarding top priority issues like maintaining trees Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:9 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 18:00:55 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2022 22:03:11 pm Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Lay out a timeline for each segment of work: e.g Gas lines, etc Mailed Correspondences N/A Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Not at all effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Have the site manager on site to go door to door to address concerns. Give that manager authority to speak freely and directly. It seemed to me Edinah had responsibility to oversee the project, but no authority to give clear and direct communication when there were concerns Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded none Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues same as answer 4 Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Be specific and do it often. Why not send an email to all households in these small projects. Flyers etc aren't reliable Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Provide the affected homes with a clear timeline and amount of disruption it will cause. This was to be complete at end of Sept. We rented a house to avoid being here for August and Sept. When we got home there was much left to be done. We were told the problem was private organizations such as US Internet cannot complete their work in a timeline that fits the construction timeline, deny them. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Being too general and vague in communicatin Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? The workers were very polite and thoughtful Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:10 Login:Registered Responded At:May 09, 2022 09:29:25 am Last Seen:May 09, 2022 16:19:07 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Much more communication on what to actually expect regarding the length of disruption and lack of notice on activities. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction I feel the communication during construction can only be described as terrible. It was impossible to know what was going on with the project and the related disruptions from one day to the next. Edinah was available but the notice was always last minute. I earlier suggested that the City of Edina should have a project text message sent out each day on what to expect. That is done by other cities but was ignored and not done by Edina. I never knew when or what was going to be happening in front of my specific house; it was a very unpleasant summer. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Much more information on this is needed. For example, I have no idea how much the project cost, how much is the assessment, and how much the city paid. There has been no communication about this. So my suggestion would be to do communication on it. Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I thought that Edinah and the project workers were willing to discuss issues and ways to minimize impacts. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Way more advance notice needed here. See comments on daily text or email messages on project activities. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? No. Just do a much better job on daily updates. Email or texts would not be hard to do - my suggestion to do this last summer was ignored. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop storing old pipes in front of peoples houses. Is a real eyesore and safety problem. No advance notice or rationale on this was ever provided. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? I think having Edinah in the neighborhood a lot made sense. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Nothing more. Respondent No:11 Login:Registered Responded At:May 09, 2022 09:37:39 am Last Seen:May 09, 2022 16:26:16 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Due to the COVID pandemic there were no meetings for the neighborhood to participate in to hear the details of plans and to provide input into things like sidewalks and the creek runoff area--until very late there was one call in City Council meeting. Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction The mail and door hanger reminders were very helpful during construction. Communication during construction was very good. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I was not in favor of the new sidewalk given the overall layout of our neighborhood. Engineering and City Council listened to our concerns and that was appreciated. However, a sidewalk was ultimately placed. What I don't appreciate is that neighborhoods such as the Golf Terrace area with much higher traffic throughput were able to effectively lobby to not have a sidewalk. As someone who drives through there, I have to watch carefully for residents and dogs in the street. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? See above, please obtain and really listen and utilize resident input. We know our neighborhood and how it functions. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? The website and comment section is good and helps with accessibility to city employees involved withe the projects. In general, the city/engineering was responsive and respectful in their communications. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:12 Login:Registered Responded At:May 11, 2022 15:07:33 pm Last Seen:May 11, 2022 21:58:44 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Very little notice or specific information. Just general information sent to every neighborhood. There was also no communication of the concurrent discussions on how to handle street assessments. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Door hanger notices were most often a person at the door the morning of a shut off. So no notice or very short notice for utility cutoffs. Caused problems working from home. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded The changing assessment framework should still be better communicated. Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Received assurances and nods of the head, but nothing was ever carried through on. Extensive meetings to protect trees and absoltely none of it was done. In addition, they put the drains, which could have gone elsewhere, directly in front of the two largest and most at risk trees, thereby being the most harmful. In other cases, I was told things would be done and they consistently were not - and are still not. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Hire better contractors and hold them to a higher standard. Don't blow off the residents who are being assessed a lot of money for this work. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Communication was poor, the construction crews were hostile and inattentive and the city did not demand better work from them. All of that should be improved for the sanity of residents and quality of work. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:13 Login:Registered Responded At:May 13, 2022 08:13:57 am Last Seen:May 13, 2022 15:02:43 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction It would have been helpful if door hanger notices could have been placed a few days ahead of time. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices There were several times we had to ask the workers for updates. We had to delay our irrigation shut down twice until the crew had reconnected our sprinkler piping. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? They placed grass seed on the area of our yard that was dug up. The seed was placed very late in the season and did not match the other grass in our yard. Now, our front yard looks terrible. For as much money as this project cost us, I feel that they should have replaced the portion of our yard that they tore up with sod. We will now have to incur this expense. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Please stop using grass seed to replace the torn up yard. Please use sod instead. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? They placed grass seed on the area of our yard that was dug up. The seed was placed very late in the season and did not match the other grass in our yard. Now, our front yard looks terrible. For as much money as this project cost us, I feel that they should have replaced the portion of our yard that they tore up with sod. We will now have to incur this expense. Respondent No:14 Login:Registered Responded At:May 13, 2022 14:49:50 pm Last Seen:May 13, 2022 21:42:40 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Communication was excellent - no issues Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices N/A Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction No issues stand out. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded I read the communications - which adequately explained this. Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I was pleased with the responsiveness of the team. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices None Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? I don't think it could have been smoother. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Nothing comes to mind. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Procedures seem to be working fine - keep on keeping on. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? I was impressed with the professionalism of every individual member of the team I encountered. Respondent No:15 Login:Registered Responded At:May 17, 2022 19:28:37 pm Last Seen:May 18, 2022 02:26:24 am City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Better communication on road closure and impacts to bussing Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction More timely as to impact to home owners property and remedies to damage Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:16 Login:Registered Responded At:May 29, 2022 07:12:07 am Last Seen:May 29, 2022 13:28:15 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction my guess is past and future communications will be better but due to Covid, in person meeting for this neighborhood were canceled. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Not at all effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction We really got any communication directly from the construction teams. Generally-they were pretty good. We had one door hanger-and it was incorrect as we are a corner lot and hanger was the wrong information for the street being worked on. Better Together really had old-nonspecific general information. Nothing timely even though we and neighbors checked often. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded We also understand-we pay for All the costs-City Utility Funds we pay for through our utilities bills every month-for Edina and all other cites- Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues What project team are you referring to? The City Project folks or the construction company. We got very good information from the heavy construction company-Dave-was very good. the concrete and landscape folks were not good at all. In fact- poor. The City of Edina-okay. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Due to weather and unexpected issues-again-the heavy construction folks were very good. Communicated-helpful. the rest? not good. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Maybe have a specific phone mailbox or additional web site to ask specific questions regarding your property. There was no one authorized place to go. Our project coordinator? The construction folks? Most neighbors had to stand outside and "flag down" city personal-Construction workers. If messages left with City of Edina personal-you can leave a message but not knowing how or when anyone would get back to you or if it was in their area of authority to resolve issues. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? ??? Got to rebuild streets It miserable but has to be done. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Same as above. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Overall-streets are nice. Difficult to get there but nice. Sidewalks? Poor. The section along our property does not drain to street-dangerous in the winter-left us with a dangerous sloped driveway that was NOT that way prior to construction. We did have many communications regarding but it appears its going to remain unresolved. We had damage in our home-Light fixtures falling off ceiling and shattering glass-Cracks in the plaster walls that were not there prior to construction-kitchen glassware actually vibrated forward and fell out of cabinets shattering glass. We had to tape the doors shut for our safety. Our new water heater failed-leaked-we had replaced under warranty but even the construction folks who very nicely helped load it up in a truck to return guessed the Heavy vibrations due to construction probably cracked it. So all in all-worse than we expected it it be- but understanding it is not easy project to do-and that is has to be done. Respondent No:17 Login:Admin Responded At:Aug 02, 2022 12:07:11 pm Last Seen:Sep 21, 2022 14:10:05 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Working crew were very considerate when responding to questions & requests. Available when in area. Response from city was positive when approached but follow up wasn't always there. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Unfortunately we came too late for city to cover our expenses. Feels like a somewhat unfair cost to the homeowner as the general public uses the street. Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues We are experiencing a problem with run off from heavy rains which are just as bad if not worse than prior to the road construction & road grading. Instead of water running along side of our driveway & forming a "gully" there and in the back yard, it is now coming into the garage and leaving standing water on the floor...It has been reported. 0 positive response as of yet...realize Edinah has been out of town until 7-18. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Considering the scope of the project, I feel we were given fair notice & minimal disruption. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Complete one project before giving priority to the next. We were told last fall, because the project went into the cold weather, that our fence & garden in front of us would be completed spring 2022. It is now 7/15/22 and still not done. I will plant the flowers (hosts) which we put back into ground in order to save them, but the city said they would put the fence back up, edging in & get the ground ready for planting! Looks pretty ugly! Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Please don't promise & not follow through. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Keep neighbors up to date on timeline. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Appreciate the new street & curbs. Not especially happy with the speedy traffic that good roads seem to encourage! Thanks for thoughtful & courteous people who have been apparent on the project, Improve the follow through. Respondent No:18 Login:Admin Responded At:Aug 02, 2022 12:20:26 pm Last Seen:Sep 21, 2022 14:10:05 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction When information was available I received it promptly. However the project stalled a lot, without notifications. Staled projects need to be communicated too. We can handle news if we know what is causing the issues. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I asked to NOT have my yard seeded and it was seeded. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices A couple times access to my driveway was unavailable (large hole). I wasn't home prior to the hole but would have liked a text message that is was going to be dug prior with times. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Maybe a schedule was posted online, I never looked. Might be nice to have a weekly schedule pushed to email or text too. The quality of soil/seed put down was nominal. The soil wasn't packed down so huge holes were people walked was evident. You need to pack it down and add seed. The amount of trash contractors left in our yards was not appreciated. Have a plant & better manage trash. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? The end result is great. The guys, the crew we saw day to day were great. It seemed they didn't get communication from Edina Engineers consistently and clearly. The city does this every year, beef up communication to the subs. With technology or zoom this can be accomplished. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-87 Melody Lake A&B, Birchcrest C, Grandview A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-457 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close public hearing at noon October 10 and to continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council Meeting. INTRODUCTION: A project area map is attached showing all the streets that were reconstructed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-87 Melody Lake A&B, Birchcrest C, Grandview A Assessment Roll Certificate of Mailing Project Area Map Melody/Birchcrest/Grandview Post Construction Survey Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2022-87 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Melody Lake A & B, Birchcrest C, and Grandview A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction – Improvement No. BA-457 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 2.68% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Melody Lake A&B, Birchcrest C, Grandview A Levy No. 22038 15 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 22 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 22, 2022. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 18th day of October, 2022. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Resolution No. 2022-87 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk MELODY LAKE A B, BIRCHCREST C, AND GRANDVIEW A STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 457PID Owner House No Street Assessable REU Utility Upgrade Roadway Assessable Amount33‐117‐21‐23‐0001 RICHARD P GRIFFITH & PATRICIA A GRIFFITH 5201 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0045 ALEX BLYAKHMAN & ANGELINA KALAYTOWICZ 5208 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0006 THE GIVING GROUP, LLC 5209 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0046 JEANNE DALY MOYNIHAN 5212 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0005 JACQUELINE GRIFFITH CROWLEY 5213 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0047 BEVERLY A BEIN 5216 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0050 JANA M HOFFMANN 5217 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0048 MARY AND JOHN LOHMANN 5220 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0094 ANDREW & DANIELA BOWEN 5221 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0049 CARL DAVID CROSBY LEHMANN & KATIE CROSBY LEHMANN 5224 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0083 NATHAN J PETERSON 5228 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0084 ANNMARIE MERRELL 5232 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0087 JONATHAN & KRISTIN ENGMAN 5236 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0045 BRIAN SANTORI & GRETA SANTORI 5309 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0046 CARE PROPERTIES LLC 5313 W 56TH ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0060 BOYD A & SHERI L HUPPERT 5600 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0093 MARCIA KOESTER 5601 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0095 PATRICK & ARLENE FINLEY 5603 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0061 LAURA KNUTSON & FREDERIK SEMMER 5604 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0096 PATRICIA C WREDE 5605 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0062 CHRISTOPHER REA & VICTORIA REA 5608 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0018 THOMAS E & ROXANNE S REESE 5609 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0063 MARY CASHMAN 5612 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0019 DONALD & JEANNE RAHE 5613 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0042 JERMAINE BROWN AND ELIZABETH MACLEAN BROWN 5616 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0020 SCOT & KRISTINA WAGGONER 5617 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0043 AMY SANFILIPPO DEMAREST 5620 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0044 JOHAN LEIDA 5624 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0035 TIMOTHY GERARD HEALY & KRISTI KAY HEALY 5700 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0034 VALERIE & MELVIN SCROGGINS 5701 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0036 ALYSSA & JON MARKER 5704 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0033 COURTLAND HALE LUKENS TTE & LAURA LUKENS TTE 5705 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0037 KATHLEEN & ROBERT GLASER 5708 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0032 MEGAN ANDERSON 5709 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0038 RENAE DEBATES 5712 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0031 THOMAS & TERESA WHALEY 5713 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0039 WILLIAM CLYNES TTE 5716 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0030 CHADD L MOSER & STACI MOSER 5717 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0040 STEVEN F & ROXANNE KRIZ 5720 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0029 ROBERT & HILLARY ZULEGER 5721 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0041 WILLIAM & SARA ANN JANOUSEK 5724 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0028 CLARE HAHNEMAN & BRADLEY LIFFORD 5725 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0047 MARK & MOLLY BIEDENFELD 5600 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0048 MARK M & MARGARET S WATT 5604 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0059 THOMAS PEDERSON & BARBARA RIECHMANN‐PEDERSON 5605 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0049 ROGER & LYNN NUNN 5608 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0051 MARTIN A MIKUS 5612 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0052 JAMES & SHARYN DOLL 5616 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0058 SCOTT MORRISON 5617 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.51 MELODY LAKE A B, BIRCHCREST C, AND GRANDVIEW A STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 45733‐117‐21‐23‐0053 ROBERT FULGENCY 5620 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0057 JERALD & JANET KNOX 5621 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0021 PHILLIP & JOAN LUNDBERG 5700 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0017 JAMES T DOUDIET & JANET S DOUDIET 5701 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0022 PATRICIA JORDAN TENNYSON 5704 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0016 PAUL STARK & JULIA STARK 5705 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0023 JAMES M KEGANS & KELLY R KEGANS 5708 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0024 THOMAS CARTER 5712 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0015 MITCHELL LEE PAGE & LINDA MARIE PAGE 5713 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0025 GAVIN M LEE & ANGELA P NELSON LEE 5716 CODE AVE 1 $6,690.00 $11,711.51 $18,401.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0026 MONICA POSNICK 5720 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0027 2222 N 7TH LLC 5724 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0076 RUTH A METZGER 5600 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0064 KEVIN BOHRER & KRISTINA K WESTPHAL BOHRER 5605 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0077 MICHAEL T LUND 5608 DALE AVE 1 $4,585.00 $11,711.51 $16,296.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0065 KIM YANNOPOULOU 5609 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0078 TERRY K & KATHERINE K LEWIS 5612 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0066 EVELYN M COFFEY 5615 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0079 RYAN MULDOWNEY 5616 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0067 ALEC S JOHNSON & HEATHER D BERAN 5617 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0080 CARRIE DECKER 5620 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0068 AKKIREDDY GUTHIKONDA & VIJAYALAKSHMI GUTHIKONDA 5621 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0081 JOSEPH & ASHLEY CAMPBELL 5624 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0082 KEITH & WENDY WITHERSPOON 5700 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0069 MEGAN & TIMOTHY GRANDE 5701 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0083 JAMES R & JUDITH A MAXA 5704 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0070 ROGER T SORENSEN & STEPHANIE R BOAEUF 5705 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0084 DANIELLE D SMITH & FABIEN PONSON 5708 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0071 KELLY LAURSEN & NATHAN BLAKE LAURSEN 5709 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0085 JOHN MUCHULAS 5712 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0072 JAMES & TERESA CASPAR 5713 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0097 MARK WILLIAM BOYSEN 5716 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0073 SCOTT AND RACHAEL ANNE SHEARER 5717 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0098 TIMOTHY A BLAKESLEY & SUN M BLAKESLEY 5720 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0074 ERIK G JOHNSON 5721 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0099 MICAHAEL & CAROLINE DIXON 5724 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0075 SHAWN P GAITHER & RACHELLE J BAKER 5725 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0100 PHILLIP R & MARSHA J SUSSMAN 5728 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0003 RICHARD & ANN FOX 5114 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0015 JOHN R & JOANNE R BENTLEY 5120 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0008 MICHELLE & ERIC Hudson 5208 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0005 PAULA S OGG/K A MCARRON 5405 HANSEN RD 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐22‐0082 SUANNE D HIBBS 5501 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0081 TEXAS GULF ATLANTIC CORP & BURSH LIVING TRUST 5509 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0057 RICHARD R & MARY J KVANBECK TTE 5511 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0056 CHRISTOPHER REEVES 5515 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐14‐0055 CITY OF EDINA 5520 HANSEN RD 8 $0.00 $93,692.12 $93,692.1233‐117‐21‐22‐0055 WESTCHESTER PROPERTIES LLC 5525 HANSEN RD 12 $0.00 $96,000.00 $96,000.0033‐117‐21‐23‐0092 FRASER COMMUNITY SERVICES 5617 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0091 SARA M WAKEFIELD 5621 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.51 MELODY LAKE A B, BIRCHCREST C, AND GRANDVIEW A STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 45733‐117‐21‐23‐0090 AMANDA & DANIEL LINDER 5625 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐14‐0053 JONATHAN ZWEIGLER 5700 HANSEN RD 1.6 $0.00 $18,738.42 $18,738.4233‐117‐21‐23‐0089 DUSTIN & LEIGHLIN BILLE 5701 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0088 DANIEL J & CAROL L FERTIG 5705 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0087 DERRONG IRENE LIN 5709 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐14‐0074 JEFFREY M & MARY L DYRHAUG 5710 HANSEN RD 0.8 $0.00 $9,369.21 $9,369.2133‐117‐21‐23‐0086 2015‐1 IH2 BORROWER 5713 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐14‐0073 JEFFREY & MARY LOUISE DYRHAUG 5714 HANSEN RD 0.8 $0.00 $9,369.21 $9,369.2132‐117‐21‐14‐0044 THOMAS C MORGAN 5716 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0104 WENDELL & DORTHY MALIN TRUST 5717 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐14‐0043 NEIL & CLAUDIA L ROGAT TTE 5720 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0103 KELSEY CHRISTENSEN 5721 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐14‐0042 ROBERT & KARA BUNCHEK 5724 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0102 DYLAN SKULE & NICOLE DRAKER 5725 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0101 ORVILLE C HOGNANDER JR 5729 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0018 TODD & KELLY SCHNELL 5712 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0011 JEFFREY A AUSTIN & ROBIN R AUSTIN 5713 MELODY LA 1 $9,320.00 $11,711.51 $21,031.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0013 2015‐3 IH2 BORROWER LP 5716 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0005 CRAIG GRIMES 5717 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0006 MARK OEHLKE & LYNN M OEHLKE 5721 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0010 BENJAMIN GUTH & HOLLY GUTH 5724 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0007 MARY DREWELOW 5725 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0014 GRANT & ELIZABETH ROBINSON 5728 MELODY LA 1 $5,000.00 $11,711.51 $16,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0008 JEFFREY A STEVENS & NICOLE M STEVENS 5729 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0009 JOHN M CONWAY 5733 MELODY LA 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0054 BRIAN PAGE 5604 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0019 CURT SCHAEFER 5605 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0055 PATRICIA L DAWSON 5608 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0012 MARSHA J ELLINGSON 5609 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0056 MARTA H GUZMAN/ANDREW MAIDEN 5612 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0012 MARK J & JEANNE M RAZIDLO 5616 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0013 LORRAINE PASCO 5620 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0017 KATHLEEN A TALBOTT TTE 5621 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0014 LAIRD W BEAVER 5624 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0016 ANDREW JAMES ELTON KUDERER 5625 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0011 DEAN S NEWINS 5629 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0010 ZACHARY & BRITTANY ARMSTRONG 5633 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0009 VALERIE PEDERSON 5637 MELODY LAKE DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0066 JOSEPH & KATHLEEN LOFTUS 5300 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0075 WAYNE JOHNSON 5301 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0068 PAUL & SUSAN J VAN PUTTEN 5304 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0076 PAUL S & LISA D JOHNSON 5305 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0069 KENNETH KOSKI 5308 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0077 RICHARD & PATRICIA SANDVIK 5309 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0070 JONATHAN N SEMBRANO TTE 5312 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0078 BENNET & MARY KATHRYN JOHNSON 5313 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0071 MICHAEL LEVY & MELISSA UNGERMAN‐LEVY 5316 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0079 BALDUS PROPERTIES LLC 5317 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0072 LISA WERNEKE NELSON TTE 5320 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0080 FAN FAN RENT LLC 5321 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.51 MELODY LAKE A B, BIRCHCREST C, AND GRANDVIEW A STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 45733‐117‐21‐22‐0073 KAROLINE SPERLING & CHARLES SPERLING 5324 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐22‐0074 DOUGLAS R JOHNSON 5328 WINDSOR AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0045 J R HENSLEY & K HENSLEY 5100 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0046 P J & K D SEMENKEWITZ 5101 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0044 S J & K J BOWER 5104 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0047 ELSIE P SEMENKEWITZ 5105 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0043 ROBERT R ROOS/MARCELA ROOS 5108 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0048 MICHAEL SHEA 5109 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0042 JOHN GAUGHAN ET AL 5112 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0049 ALEKSEY & ANDREZA DEREVYANKO 5113 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0041 KATHLEEN L & PAUL FINK 5116 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0050 JOSIE L FIX & JEFFREY A FIX 5117 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0040 B H HANSEN ETAL 5120 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0051 SCOTT R & LAURA A DAVIDSON 5121 58TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0012 J CHOJOR & Y D GONGPATSANG 5105 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0010 M G HEWITT & M E HEWITT 5108 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0013 JAMES A & VIKKI L GILLIGAN 5109 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0009 BRIAN KOVALCHUK 5112 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0014 JON & JENNIFER MARKET TRUST 5113 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0008 JOSEPH CAMERON 5116 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0007 M & M OVIKIAN 5120 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0015 BILAL S ALI & ZUJAJA SADIQ 5121 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0016 ALAN DUANE REITZ/HEIDI REITZ 5125 59TH ST W 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0018 MARK O'CONNELL 5200 60TH ST W 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0063 K A & T G ANDERSON 5300 60TH ST W 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0080 MARY MCNIFF 5324 60TH ST W 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0029 VILLAGE OF EDINA 24 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2 $0.00 $23,423.03 $23,423.0333‐117‐21‐31‐0057 J M TERSECK & J TERSECK 5100 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0001 H D CATRON & C D CATRON 5101 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0052 ROBERT A SCHOENBAUM ET AL 5120 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0006 AMY B MEYERS 5121 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0073 MARY ANN STONE 5200 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0013 ANNE M ERICSON TRUSTEE 5201 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0024 D H KNUTSON & J F KNUTSON 5215 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0026 DONNA JOAN WEBB 5216 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0038 MATHIEU SELLS & RENEE SELLS 5300 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0069 COREY M STRICKLAND 5325 BENTON AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0033 GREGORY M NATIONS 5800 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0031 M J HAUTLA & H S HAUTLA 5801 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0034 WHITNEY BLAKE WALDEN 5804 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0030 R & E PRESTRUD 5805 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0029 S AUBITZ & S B AUBITZ TRSTES 5807 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0035 M L & M J DESLAURIERS 5808 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0036 CHRISTOPHER CHOW/JUNQING XIN 5812 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0028 A C PETERSON & J R PETERSON 5813 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0037 J M FINLEY & J K FINLEY 5816 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0027 P J & J C HENNESSY 5817 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0057 RYAN RIEBLING & CAROLINE BYRD 5900 BERNARD PL 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0059 ALEXANDRA & JACOB STEPHANY 5904 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0066 O S & H HAKIMI 5905 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.51 MELODY LAKE A B, BIRCHCREST C, AND GRANDVIEW A STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 45733‐117‐21‐32‐0060 ERIN & NATHAN CHAUSSEE 5908 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0023 C & G MEITZ 5909 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0061 DAVID W SARP/PAULETTE S SARP 5912 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0022 L D PETERSON & H A PETERSON 5913 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0062 GEORGE H CARLES ET AL 5916 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0021 D HUSTRULID & R HUSTRULID 5917 BERNARD PL 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0020 R E RATLIFF & S L RATLIFF 5921 BERNARD PL 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0007 A R THELEMANN III ET AL TR 5804 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0008 GERALD F BOGDA & WIFE 5808 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0009 RICHARD Y BAE/LAUREN KIM BAE 5812 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0010 JOAN M OLSON 5816 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0014 R BARIBAULT/S BARIBAULTTR 5904 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0015 JODI P YOUNGREV TRUST 5908 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0016 SCOTT J & MARA J PETERSEN 5912 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0017 D & L HOENE 5916 CODE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0045 JEFFREY O SKINNER & CAROLYN BERGER 5800 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0044 MICHAEL OLSON & TARA FALSANI 5801 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0046 P C BIEWEN & A E BIEWEN 5804 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0043 LAURETTE A BLAKE 5805 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0047 M M MODARES & M MODARES 5808 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0042 THOMAS C & CHRISTINE D EVANS 5809 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0048 JEFFREY JOHNSON/RITA JOHNSON 5812 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0041 D F GRAFT & B K GRAFT 5813 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0049 DAVID W & KRISTINE M WETMORE 5816 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0040 TESS VERTIN & GREGORY LUNDGREN 5817 DALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0050 NASSIOS SERVICES LLC 5820 DALE AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐32‐0039 KRIDSANA PHONORTHONG 5821 DALE AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0075 KATHLEEN & CARSON BENCH 5800 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0068 M R YEAGER & J M YEAGER 5801 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0067 S W JEPSEN & R E JEPSEN 5805 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0066 J A DOLPHIN & M C DOLPHIN 5809 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0074 JENNIFER S STACK/C T GORNEY 5812 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0065 P G SANDA & S C SANDA 5813 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0076 TREVOR & DANIELLE BUSBY 5816 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0064 R J V VOSE & A M H VOSE 5817 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0077 J C SELLE & J R SELLE 5820 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0063 DAVID C SANDA/SUSAN W SANDA 5821 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0062 R H LUEDTKE & V A LUEDTKE 5825 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0069 MATTHEW & ELIZABETH ZUNG 5828 EASTVIEW DR 0.5 $6,000.00 $5,855.76 $11,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0061 TAYLOR & COURTNEY RIDLEY 5829 EASTVIEW DR 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0060 KYLE WISLOCKY 5833 EASTVIEW DR 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐24‐0001 CITY OF EDINA 5100 GROVE ST 2 $0.00 $23,423.03 $23,423.0333‐117‐21‐31‐0034 J H HARTWELL & C HARTWELL 5101 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0035 MATTHEW & HOLLY PALM 5105 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0036 JAKE & ANNA ELDRIDGE 5109 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0002 BRETT & THERESA HALVERSON 5110 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0037 ROBERT & MELISSA LEWIS 5113 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0038 T J SCHILLING/A C SCHILLING 5117 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0039 T P UNDERDAHL/A M UNDERDAHL 5121 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐24‐0004 ANDREW & ROBIN ANDERSON 5124 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.51 MELODY LAKE A B, BIRCHCREST C, AND GRANDVIEW A STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 45733‐117‐21‐23‐0007 BRADLEY D RHOADES 5200 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0003 STEPHEN P & TERRI O MENKE 5201 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐23‐0002 J M CRIST & J H CRIST 5204 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0004 LARRY J MAY/SANDRA A MAY TRS 5205 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0082 KARI KOUATLI 5209 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0032 R S LUND & H A LUND 5213 GROVE ST 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0030 ELIZABETH HOPF & ERIC HOPF 5800 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0056 JAY R ADDY & KARIN E R ADDY 5801 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0031 S A LEVIN & J A LEVIN 5804 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0055 ROBERT & AUDREY ROGNESS TRST 5805 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0032 B C & J A VANHOVE 5808 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0054 M KNOBEN & R VARGHESE 5809 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0068 A M ZHURAVEL & M R ZHURAVEL 5812 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0053 RYAN TRAPP & KAYLA JANTO 5813 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0066 K J VARGO/D F PREIS TRUSTEES 5816 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0052 R C & L D LARSON 5817 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0051 BENJAMIN E FOOTE 5821 HANSEN RD 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7632‐117‐21‐41‐0110 ERIC WALKER & CLAIRE WALKER 5824 HANSEN RD 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7632‐117‐21‐41‐0038 JOHN JORAN & SHANNON JORAN 5900 HANSEN RD 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7632‐117‐21‐41‐0040 J S FINZEN & K SLATER FINZEN 5908 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0001 A B W ANDREWS ET AL SUBJ/LE 5909 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0041 J V NELSON & J M NELSON 5912 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0076 J K NEWBURG & E T NEWBURG 5913 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0036 JOHN H WARD 5916 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐32‐0077 S & L POLLMANN 5917 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5132‐117‐21‐41‐0037 CAREY PROPERTIES LLC 5920 HANSEN RD 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0078 NIPA PATEL 5900 JOSEPHINE AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0087 W E AVERY & R V AVERY 5901 JOSEPHINE AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0079 P B HEIM & S L D HEIM 5904 JOSEPHINE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0086 DANIEL A KING/KRISTIN R KING 5905 JOSEPHINE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0080 TOMMY S PHILL ETAL 5908 JOSEPHINE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0085 S M SOLAKIAN/SARKIS SOLAKIAN 5909 JOSEPHINE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0082 CARTER BEBENSEE 5912 JOSEPHINE AVE 0.67 $0.00 $7,846.71 $7,846.7133‐117‐21‐31‐0084 SAMUEL P & BARBARA A VERDUCI 5913 JOSEPHINE AVE 0.67 $0.00 $7,846.71 $7,846.7133‐117‐21‐31‐0091 H J MEEKER JR & H MEEKER 5809 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0090 MARY V & JAY A KOSTERS 5813 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0030 CRAIG M OLDAKOWSKI 5821 TINGDALE AVE 0.5 $0.00 $5,855.76 $5,855.7633‐117‐21‐31‐0031 M FIOL/A FIOL/M FIOL 5825 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0032 MICHAEL J CHAPURAN 5829 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0011 L J BECKER & M D SANDLER 5900 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0024 T M & M A LAFORCE 5901 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.5133‐117‐21‐31‐0025 R C SMITH & D J SMITH 5905 TINGDALE AVE 1 $0.00 $11,711.51 $11,711.51 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 15, 2022, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Melody Lake A & B, Birchcrest C, and Grandview A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. BA-457 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 21 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 15th day of Sept. 2022. ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-457 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Thurs., Oct. 6, 2022, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the Melody Lake A & B, Birchcrest C, Grandview A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction: Property Identification No. 33-117-21-23-0001 The special assessment to this property for roadway reconstruction is $11,711.51 and the special assessment for utility upgrades is $0.00. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $3,440,105.85. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. Payment Options The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years at the rate of 2.68 percent. Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the Oct. 6 meeting, you may pay the assessment in one of these ways: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest payable to the City of Edina and mail check to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 22, 2022. 2. Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment payable to the City of Edina and mail check to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 22, 2022. The remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2023, with interest on the remaining assessment at the rate of 2.68 percent per annum from Oct. 18, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2023. 3. Pay the assessment with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid in the Assessing Office by Nov. 22, 2022, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2023, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 2.68 percent per annum from Oct. 18, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2023. Deferment The City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for a homestead property owned by a person age 65 or older, one retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability, or a member of the 2 National Guard or other reserves ordered to active military service for whom it would be a hardship to make payments. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor’s Office by Nov. 15, 2022. Contact Jamie Ericksen at 952-826-0424 or JEricksen@EdinaMN.gov to learn the procedures to apply for deferment and make arrangements to file your application by calling. Below is an example of your annual payment over 15 years (principal plus interest). Payments are amortized using a level annual payment schedule. Sample Total Assessment Sample Annual Payment (Principal + Interest) $9,083.42 $743.38 $11,711.51 $958.47 Objection and/or Appeal to the Assessment 1. If you wish to object to the amount of your assessment, email a signed, written objection to the City Clerk, sallison@EdinaMN.gov, before the assessment public hearing. 2. Per Minn. Stat. § 429.081, you may appeal the amount of your assessment to district court by serving notice of the appeal to the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days after the assessment amount is adopted at the assessment public hearing and file the same notice with the district court within 10 days after the notice was served to the Mayor or the City Clerk. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. To comment on the special assessment, you may: • Write to City of Edina, Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439. • Email to mail@EdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Engineering. • Attend the Oct 6th City Council Meeting, watch the public hearing online or on Edina TV and call in to offer comments, leave a voicemail in advance or submit your comments online. Ways to participate are included in this mailing. If you have questions regarding the project, please call the Engineering Department at 952-826-0371. If you have questions about paying your assessment, please call the Assessing Division at 952-826-0365. September 15, 2022 Sharon Allison City Clerk 3 Cut the bottom section and mail in with your payment if paying on or before Nov. 22, 2022: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PAYMENT PROCEDURE • If paying on or before Nov. 22, 2022, please cut and return this stub with your payment. • Make check payable to the City of Edina. • Mail payment: City of Edina , Assessing Division, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. PID Impr. No. Pay this total amount by Nov. 22, 2022, to avoid future interest charges. If not paid on or before Nov. 22, 2022, the assessment will be placed on your property taxes at 2.68 percent annual interest rate, spread out over 15 years. 33-117-21-23-0001 BA-457 $11,711.51 Amount Enclosed: Name: 4 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNo tices Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2022 HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/annual-assessment-public- hearings1 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the October 6th meeting, 1-888-504-7949. The Conference ID number is 711292 4) Attend the public hearing meeting on October 6th to provide input, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its October 6th meeting and will make a decision at its October 18th meeting. The deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, October 10th. PID Owner MAIL TO: CITY STATE ZIP33‐117‐21‐23‐0001 RICHARD P GRIFFITH & PATRICIA A GRIFFITH 5201 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0045 ALEX BLYAKHMAN & ANGELINA KALAYTOWICZ 5208 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0006 THE GIVING GROUP, LLC 7009 EVEREST LANE N MAPLE GROVE MN 5531133‐117‐21‐22‐0046 JEANNE DALY MOYNIHAN 5212 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0005 JACQUELINE GRIFFITH CROWLEY 5213 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0047 BEVERLY A BEIN 5216 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0050 JANA M HOFFMANN 5217 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0048 MARY AND JOHN LOHMANN 5220 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0094 ANDREW & DANIELA BOWEN 5221 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0049 CARL DAVID CROSBY LEHMANN & KATIE CROSBY LEHMANN 5224 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0083 NATHAN J PETERSON 5228 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0084 ANNMARIE MERRELL 5232 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0087 JONATHAN & KRISTIN ENGMAN 5236 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0045 BRIAN SANTORI & GRETA SANTORI 5309 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0046 CARE PROPERTIES LLC 5025 KNOX AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 5541933‐117‐21‐23‐0060 BOYD A & SHERI L HUPPERT 5600 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0093 MARCIA KOESTER 5601 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0095 PATRICK & ARLENE FINLEY 5603 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0061 LAURA KNUTSON & FREDERIK SEMMER 5604 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0096 PATRICIA C WREDE 5605 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0062 CHRISTOPHER REA & VICTORIA REA 5608 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0018 THOMAS E & ROXANNE S REESE 5609 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0063 MARY CASHMAN 5612 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0019 DONALD & JEANNE RAHE 5613 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0042 JERMAINE BROWN AND ELIZABETH MACLEAN BROWN 5616 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0020 SCOT & KRISTINA WAGGONER 5617 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0043 AMY SANFILIPPO DEMAREST 5620 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0044 JOHAN LEIDA 5624 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0035 TIMOTHY GERARD HEALY & KRISTI KAY HEALY 5700 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0034 VALERIE & MELVIN SCROGGINS 5701 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0036 ALYSSA & JON MARKER 5704 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0033 COURTLAND HALE LUKENS TTE & LAURA LUKENS TTE 5705 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0037 KATHLEEN & ROBERT GLASER 5708 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0032 MEGAN ANDERSON 5709 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0038 RENAE DEBATES 5712 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0031 THOMAS & TERESA WHALEY 5713 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0039 WILLIAM CLYNES TTE 5716 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0030 CHADD L MOSER & STACI MOSER 5717 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0040 STEVEN F & ROXANNE KRIZ 5720 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0029 ROBERT & HILLARY ZULEGER 5721 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0041 WILLIAM & SARA ANN JANOUSEK5724 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0028 CLARE HAHNEMAN & BRADLEY LIFFORD 5725 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 55436 33‐117‐21‐23‐0047 MARK & MOLLY BIEDENFELD 5600 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0048 MARK M & MARGARET S WATT 5604 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0059 THOMAS PEDERSON & BARBARA RIECHMANN‐PEDERSON 5605 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0049 ROGER & LYNN NUNN 5608 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0051 MARTIN A MIKUS 5612 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0052 JAMES & SHARYN DOLL 5616 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0058 SCOTT MORRISON 5617 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0053 ROBERT FULGENCY 5620 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0057 JERALD & JANET KNOX 5621 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0021 PHILLIP & JOAN LUNDBERG 5700 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0017 JAMES T DOUDIET & JANET S DOUDIET 5701 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0022 PATRICIA JORDAN TENNYSON 5704 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0016 PAUL STARK & JULIA STARK 5705 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0023 JAMES M KEGANS & KELLY R KEGANS 5708 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0024 THOMAS CARTER 5712 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0015 MITCHELL LEE PAGE & LINDA MARIE PAGE 5713 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0025 GAVIN M LEE & ANGELA P NELSON LEE 5716 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0026 MONICA POSNICK 5720 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0027 2222 N 7TH LLC 4710 GOLF TERRACE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0076 RUTH A METZGER 5600 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0064 KEVIN BOHRER & KRISTINA K WESTPHAL BOHRER 5605 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0077 MICHAEL T LUND 5608 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0065 KIM YANNOPOULOU 5609 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0078 TERRY K & KATHERINE K LEWIS 5612 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0066 EVELYN M COFFEY 5615 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0079 RYAN MULDOWNEY 5616 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0067 ALEC S JOHNSON & HEATHER D BERAN 5617 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0080 CARRIE DECKER 5620 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0068 AKKIREDDY GUTHIKONDA & VIJAYALAKSHMI GUTHIKONDA 5621 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0081 JOSEPH & ASHLEY CAMPBELL 5624 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0082 KEITH & WENDY WITHERSPOON 5700 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0069 MEGAN & TIMOTHY GRANDE 5701 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0083 JAMES R & JUDITH A MAXA 5704 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0070 ROGER T SORENSEN & STEPHANIE R BOAEUF 5705 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0084 DANIELLE D SMITH & FABIEN PONSON 5708 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0071 KELLY LAURSEN & NATHAN BLAKE LAURSEN 5709 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0085 JOHN MUCHULAS 5712 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0072 JAMES & TERESA CASPAR 5713 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0097 MARK WILLIAM BOYSEN 5716 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0073 SCOTT AND RACHAEL ANNE SHEARER 5717 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0098 TIMOTHY A BLAKESLEY & SUN M BLAKESLEY 5720 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0074 ERIK G JOHNSON 5721 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0099 MICAHAEL & CAROLINE DIXON 5724 DALE AVE EDINA MN 55436 33‐117‐21‐23‐0075 SHAWN P GAITHER & RACHELLE J BAKER 5725 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0100 PHILLIP R & MARSHA J SUSSMAN 5728 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0003 RICHARD & ANN FOX 5114 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0015 JOHN R & JOANNE R BENTLEY 5120 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0008 MICHELLE & ERIC Hudson 5208 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0005 PAULA S OGG/K A MCARRON 5405 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0082 SUANNE D HIBBS 5501 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0081 TEXAS GULF ATLANTIC CORP & BURSH LIVING TRUST 615 BALBOA ST IRVING TX 7506233‐117‐21‐22‐0057 RICHARD R & MARY J KVANBECK TTE 5511 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0056 CHRISTOPHER REEVES 5515 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐14‐0055 CITY OF EDINA 5520 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0055 WESTCHESTER PROPERTIES LLC C/O MAIN STREET COMPANIES, 5605 W 36TH ST STE 114C ST LOUIS PARK MN 5541633‐117‐21‐23‐0092 FRASER COMMUNITY SERVICES 2400 64TH ST W RICHFIELD MN 5542333‐117‐21‐23‐0091 SARA M WAKEFIELD 5621 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0090 AMANDA & DANIEL LINDER 5625 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐14‐0053 JONATHAN ZWEIGLER 5700 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0089 DUSTIN & LEIGHLIN BILLE 5701 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0088 DANIEL J & CAROL L FERTIG 5705 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0087 DERRONG IRENE LIN 5709 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐14‐0074 JEFFREY M & MARY L DYRHAUG 5710 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0086 2015‐1 IH2 BORROWER 1717 MAIN STREET, STE 2000 DALLAS TX 7520132‐117‐21‐14‐0073 JEFFREY & MARY LOUISE DYRHAUG 5714 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐14‐0044 THOMAS C MORGAN 5716 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0104 WENDELL & DORTHY MALIN TRUST 5717 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐14‐0043 NEIL & CLAUDIA L ROGAT TTE 5720 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0103 KELSEY CHRISTENSEN 5721 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐14‐0042 ROBERT & KARA BUNCHEK 5724 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0102 DYLAN SKULE & NICOLE DRAKER 5725 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0101 ORVILLE C HOGNANDER JR 5729 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0018 TODD & KELLY SCHNELL 5712 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0011 JEFFREY A AUSTIN & ROBIN R AUSTIN 5713 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0013 2015‐3 IH2 BORROWER LP 1717 MAIN ST, SUITE 2000 DALLAS TX 7520133‐117‐21‐24‐0005 CRAIG GRIMES 5717 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0006 MARK OEHLKE & LYNN M OEHLKE 5721 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0010 BENJAMIN GUTH & HOLLY GUTH 5724 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0007 MARY DREWELOW 5725 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0014 GRANT & ELIZABETH ROBINSON 5728 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0008 JEFFREY A STEVENS & NICOLE M STEVENS 5729 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0009 JOHN M CONWAY 5733 MELODY LA EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0054 BRIAN PAGE 5604 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0019 CURT SCHAEFER 5605 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0055 PATRICIA L DAWSON 5608 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0012 MARSHA J ELLINGSON 5609 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 55436 33‐117‐21‐23‐0056 MARTA H GUZMAN/ANDREW MAIDEN 5612 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0012 MARK J & JEANNE M RAZIDLO 5616 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0013 LORRAINE PASCO 5620 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0017 KATHLEEN A TALBOTT TTE 28 SKYLONDA DR EDINA MN 9406233‐117‐21‐23‐0014 LAIRD W BEAVER 5624 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0016 ANDREW JAMES ELTON KUDERER 5625 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0011 DEAN S NEWINS 5629 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0010 ZACHARY & BRITTANY ARMSTRONG 5633 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0009 VALERIE PEDERSON 5637 MELODY LAKE DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0066 JOSEPH & KATHLEEN LOFTUS 5300 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0075 WAYNE JOHNSON 5301 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0068 PAUL & SUSAN J VAN PUTTEN 5304 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0076 PAUL S & LISA D JOHNSON 5305 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0069 KENNETH KOSKI 5308 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0077 RICHARD & PATRICIA SANDVIK 5309 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0070 JONATHAN N SEMBRANO TTE 5312 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0078 BENNET & MARY KATHRYN JOHNSON 5313 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0071 MICHAEL LEVY & MELISSA UNGERMAN‐LEVY 5316 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0079 BALDUS PROPERTIES LLC 3009 CENTRAL AVE NE MINNEAPOLIS MN 5541833‐117‐21‐22‐0072 LISA WERNEKE NELSON TTE 5320 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0080 FAN FAN RENT LLC 10449 PURDEY RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5534733‐117‐21‐22‐0073 KAROLINE SPERLING & CHARLES SPERLING 5324 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐22‐0074 DOUGLAS R JOHNSON 5328 WINDSOR AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0045 J R HENSLEY & K HENSLEY 5100 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0046 P J & K D SEMENKEWITZ 5101 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0044 S J & K J BOWER 5104 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0047 ELSIE P SEMENKEWITZ 5105 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0043 ROBERT R ROOS/MARCELA ROOS 5108 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0048 MICHAEL SHEA 5109 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0042 JOHN GAUGHAN ET AL 5112 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0049 ALEKSEY & ANDREZA DEREVYANKO 5113 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0041 KATHLEEN L & PAUL FINK 5116 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0050 JOSIE L FIX & JEFFREY A FIX 5117 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0040 B H HANSEN ETAL 5120 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0051 SCOTT R & LAURA A DAVIDSON 5121 58TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0012 J CHOJOR & Y D GONGPATSANG 5105 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0010 M G HEWITT & M E HEWITT 5108 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0013 JAMES A & VIKKI L GILLIGAN 5109 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0009 BRIAN KOVALCHUK 4741 THOMAS AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 5541033‐117‐21‐31‐0014 JON & JENNIFER MARKET TRUST 5113 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0008 JOSEPH CAMERON 5116 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0007 M & M OVIKIAN 5120 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0015 BILAL S ALI & ZUJAJA SADIQ5121 59TH ST W EDINA MN 55436 33‐117‐21‐31‐0016 ALAN DUANE REITZ/HEIDI REITZ 5125 59TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0018 MARK O'CONNELL 5200 60TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0063 K A & T G ANDERSON 5300 60TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0080 MARY MCNIFF 5324 60TH ST W EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0029 VILLAGE OF EDINA 24 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0057 J M TERSECK & J TERSECK 5100 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0001 H D CATRON & C D CATRON 5101 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0052 ROBERT A SCHOENBAUM ET AL 5120 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0006 AMY B MEYERS 5121 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0073 MARY ANN STONE 5200 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0013 ANNE M ERICSON TRUSTEE 5201 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0024 D H KNUTSON & J F KNUTSON 5215 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0026 DONNA JOAN WEBB 5216 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0038 MATHIEU SELLS & RENEE SELLS 5300 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0069 COREY M STRICKLAND 5325 BENTON AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0033 GREGORY M NATIONS 5800 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0031 M J HAUTLA & H S HAUTLA 5801 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0034 WHITNEY BLAKE WALDEN 5804 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0030 R & E PRESTRUD 5805 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0029 S AUBITZ & S B AUBITZ TRSTES 5807 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0035 M L & M J DESLAURIERS 5808 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0036 CHRISTOPHER CHOW/JUNQING XIN 5812 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0028 A C PETERSON & J R PETERSON 5813 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0037 J M FINLEY & J K FINLEY 5816 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0027 P J & J C HENNESSY 5817 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0057 RYAN RIEBLING & CAROLINE BYRD 5900 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0059 ALEXANDRA & JACOB STEPHANY 5904 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0066 O S & H HAKIMI 5905 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0060 ERIN & NATHAN CHAUSSEE 5908 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0023 C & G MEITZ 5909 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0061 DAVID W SARP/PAULETTE S SARP 5912 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0022 L D PETERSON & H A PETERSON 5913 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0062 GEORGE H CARLES ET AL 5916 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0021 D HUSTRULID & R HUSTRULID 5917 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0020 R E RATLIFF & S L RATLIFF 5921 BERNARD PL EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0007 A R THELEMANN III ET AL TR 5804 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0008 GERALD F BOGDA & WIFE 5808 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0009 RICHARD Y BAE/LAUREN KIM BAE 5812 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0010 JOAN M OLSON 5816 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0014 R BARIBAULT/S BARIBAULTTR 5904 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0015 JODI P YOUNGREV TRUST 5908 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0016 SCOTT J & MARA J PETERSEN 5912 CODE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0017 D & L HOENE 5916 CODE AVE EDINA MN 55436 33‐117‐21‐32‐0045 JEFFREY O SKINNER & CAROLYN BERGER 5800 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0044 MICHAEL OLSON & TARA FALSANI 5801 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0046 P C BIEWEN & A E BIEWEN 5804 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0043 LAURETTE A BLAKE 5805 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0047 M M MODARES & M MODARES 5808 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0042 THOMAS C & CHRISTINE D EVANS 5809 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0048 JEFFREY JOHNSON/RITA JOHNSON 5812 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0041 D F GRAFT & B K GRAFT5813 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0049 DAVID W & KRISTINE M WETMORE 5816 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0040 TESS VERTIN & GREGORY LUNDGREN 5817 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0050 NASSIOS SERVICES LLC 848 MOUND ST ST PAUL MN 5510633‐117‐21‐32‐0039 KRIDSANA PHONORTHONG 5821 DALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0075 KATHLEEN & CARSON BENCH 5800 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0068 M R YEAGER & J M YEAGER 5801 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0067 S W JEPSEN & R E JEPSEN 5805 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0066 J A DOLPHIN & M C DOLPHIN 5809 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0074 JENNIFER S STACK/C T GORNEY 5812 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0065 P G SANDA & S C SANDA5813 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0076 TREVOR & DANIELLE BUSBY 5816 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0064 R J V VOSE & A M H VOSE 5817 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0077 J C SELLE & J R SELLE 5820 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0063 DAVID C SANDA/SUSAN W SANDA5821 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0062 R H LUEDTKE & V A LUEDTKE 5825 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0069 MATTHEW & ELIZABETH ZUNG 5828 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0061 TAYLOR & COURTNEY RIDLEY 5829 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0060 KYLE WISLOCKY 5833 EASTVIEW DR EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0001 CITY OF EDINA 5100 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0034 J H HARTWELL & C HARTWELL 5101 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0035 MATTHEW & HOLLY PALM 5105 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0036 JAKE & ANNA ELDRIDGE 5109 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0002 BRETT & THERESA HALVERSON 5110 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0037 ROBERT & MELISSA LEWIS 5113 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0038 T J SCHILLING/A C SCHILLING 5117 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0039 T P UNDERDAHL/A M UNDERDAHL 5121 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐24‐0004 ANDREW & ROBIN ANDERSON 5124 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0007 BRADLEY D RHOADES 5200 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0003 STEPHEN P & TERRI O MENKE 5201 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐23‐0002 J M CRIST & J H CRIST 5204 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0004 LARRY J MAY/SANDRA A MAY TRS 5205 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0082 KARI KOUATLI 5209 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0032 R S LUND & H A LUND 5213 GROVE ST EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0030 ELIZABETH HOPF & ERIC HOPF 5800 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0056 JAY R ADDY & KARIN E R ADDY 5801 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 55436 32‐117‐21‐41‐0031 S A LEVIN & J A LEVIN 5804 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0055 ROBERT & AUDREY ROGNESS TRST 5805 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0032 B C & J A VANHOVE 5808 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0054 M KNOBEN & R VARGHESE 5809 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0068 A M ZHURAVEL & M R ZHURAVEL 5812 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0053 RYAN TRAPP & KAYLA JANTO 5813 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0066 K J VARGO/D F PREIS TRUSTEES 5816 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0052 R C & L D LARSON 5817 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0051 BENJAMIN E FOOTE 5821 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0110 ERIC WALKER & CLAIRE WALKER 5824 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0038 JOHN JORAN & SHANNON JORAN 5900 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0040 J S FINZEN & K SLATER FINZEN 5908 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0001 A B W ANDREWS ET AL SUBJ/LE 5909 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0041 J V NELSON & J M NELSON 5912 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0076 J K NEWBURG & E T NEWBURG 5913 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0036 JOHN H WARD 5916 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐32‐0077 S & L POLLMANN 5917 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543632‐117‐21‐41‐0037 CAREY PROPERTIES LLC 5920 HANSEN RD EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0078 NIPA PATEL 5900 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0087 W E AVERY & R V AVERY 5901 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0079 P B HEIM & S L D HEIM 5904 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0086 DANIEL A KING/KRISTIN R KING 5905 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0080 TOMMY S PHILL ETAL 5908 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0085 S M SOLAKIAN/SARKIS SOLAKIAN 5909 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0082 CARTER BEBENSEE 5912 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0084 SAMUEL P & BARBARA A VERDUCI 5913 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0091 H J MEEKER JR & H MEEKER 5809 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0090 MARY V & JAY A KOSTERS 5813 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0030 CRAIG M OLDAKOWSKI 5821 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0031 M FIOL/A FIOL/M FIOL 5825 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0032 MICHAEL J CHAPURAN 5829 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0011 L J BECKER & M D SANDLER 5900 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0024 T M & M A LAFORCE 5901 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 5543633‐117‐21‐31‐0025 R C SMITH & D J SMITH 5905 TINGDALE AVE EDINA MN 55436Total 5205 5209521352175221 5300 5132- 34 52005025 5909 5041 5212 5316 5721 5037 6005 5501 5024 5709 501352095204520852135100 5525 5020 5805 5511 5018 5032 5717 5917 5829 5224 5433 5515 5028 5813 5908 5805 5807 5916 5912 5912 5409-11 5909 5817 59045904 5908 5917 5913 5816 5024 5304 5605 5416 5808 5817 5821 5825 5724 5309 6001 5213 5813 5913 5036 6001 5412 5417 5029 5228 5401 5809 5920 5405 5216 5220 5213 5713 5217 24 5208 5725 5812 542054255609 5100 5901 5232 5728 5921 5912 5625 5900 5004 5232 5604 5233 5700- 04 5008 5905 5612 5234 5110 5904 5801 5021 5325 5600 5017 5216 5908 5624 5053 5209 5908 5012 5120 5516 5828 5408 5317 5509 5904 5812 5400 5048 5808 5608 5900 5236 5300 5114 5328 53045805 5409 5208 5905 53125101 5120 5916 5821 5621 5700 5325 5809 5733 5033 5909 5120 5813 5121 5824 5612 5905 5301 5616 5124 5409 5805 5113 5812 5201 5817 5701 5804 5200 5710-14 5816 5916 5620 5105 5520 5912 5300 5012 5705 5716 5621 5729 5800 51205728 5117 5101 50405200 58125809 5204 5800 5813 52095208 5729 5012 5805 53015817 5804 5321 5120 5808 520552175716 52135804 5517 52135036 5313530552095029 5808 5809 5801 5816 5616 5120-22 5620 5913 5108 5812 5605 5637 5800 5112 5616 5321 51155109 5116 5613 5609 5833 50055108 5017 5617 5901 5044 5825 5044 5201 5801 5829 5215 5603 5800 5821 5724 5117 5609 53175004 5621 5124- 26 5201 5412 53095821 5620 5212 502054105624 54165701 5801 5016 5224 5605 5600 5517 5615 5105 5121 5320 5105 5025 5212 5820 5109 5724 5708 5617 5008 5109 5324 5716 5521 5708 6000 5040 5629 5004 5712 520150325205 5612 5216 5201 5208 5028 5204 5704 5020 5608 5720 5804 5033 5017 5201 5032 5209 5704 5020 5400 5617 5700 5401 5621 5025 5116 5720 5009 5305 5036 5100 57095313 5725 5712 5713 5717 5633 5705 5029 53096001 5717 5016 5724 5601 5705 5900 5017 5816 5005 5405 5045 5713 5721 5701 5124 5725 5301 5009522150256001 5100 5713 510851035312 5104 5005 5321 5200 5028 5116 5313 5112 5721 5120 5608 5024 5317 5113 5100 5712 5205 5101 5713 5112 5013 5101 510953085121 5104 5049 5105 5625 51095117 5113 5208 5604 5105 5028 5113 6001 5701 5204 5709 6000 5117 5021 5705 5021 5720 5624 5820 512153205128-30 5415 531656015712 5717 5620 5600 53245813 5704 53045700 51125220 51045033 5708 51045205 6000 5025 5419 6005 5041 50295037 50115605 6005 50175021 5005 50365105510851165725 552451095048 50405013 5716 6004 50085721 5229 6000 51175009 5041 5 1 0 0 5900 5809 5716 5724 501250045616 60055225 50095720 5113502150086004 50095056 50365617 50045404 50125041500550175033503250375108500850375520 5524 5109502550205600 5212 5029511250455528 51055608 50245029503350285532 5816 5009 50405037 501650125612 5604 50135033 5525501651085036504951045041501650285024503250205116 5044505350085125 PROJECT LIMITS Garden Park V E R N O N A V E WINDSOR AVE W 56TH ST W 57TH ST GROVE STHANSEN RDHANSEN RDDALE AVEBERNARD PLCODE AVEMELODY LAKE DRMELODY LNCODE AVEW 58TH ST EASTVI EW DRHANSEN RDBERNARD PLCODE AVETINGDALE AVEJOSEPHINE AVEW 59TH ST BENTON AVE W 60TH ST Tingdale Park / Engineering Dept June 2020 2021 Project Area Melody Lake A & B, Grandview A and Birchcrest C Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionCITYOFEDINAMINNESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 20 September 2022 Project Feedback Form Better Together Edina Project: Melody Lake A & B, Birchcrest C and Grandview A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction VISITORS 46 CONTRIBUTORS 30 RESPONSES 30 30 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 30 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Apr 30, 2022 09:38:30 am Last Seen:Apr 30, 2022 16:28:35 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Be consistent Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues The construction people where great to work with Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop putting in sidewalks that the residents don’t want. Post construction most people are still not using the sidewalk and the street is narrowed by 9ft. More dangerous Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Apr 30, 2022 12:04:19 pm Last Seen:Apr 30, 2022 19:00:04 pm City Meetings Very Effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Very Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues The City's team was outstanding. Kudos to Evan for being very helpful throughout. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Overall I think the project went very well. Early on it seemed like they would 'never' start but I think the construction companies had other competing projects. From time to time it seemed that they 'disappeared' for multiple days and then magically re-appeared. I understand that there were also some delays in getting materials, so scheduling was not always easily managed. Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:Apr 30, 2022 16:17:50 pm Last Seen:Apr 30, 2022 22:39:56 pm City Meetings Very Effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Very Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction It would have been nice to have had a status update at some point. I kept having to check with engineering to find out when things were going to happen. I suppose posting upstate would hold you to a date. Our street would have appreciated an update on when the asphalt was coming. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues There was no advance notice on the impact of the big equipment on trees. Trees on my block were damaged and residents had to raise a ruckus to get the trees properly trimmed and the wounds closed. The city should have had a tree expert overseeing this. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? I thought this project was too big. It went on and on and into the cold weather. I would much rather have had a more manageable project with enough time to finish the details correctly. Perhaps it was like this because you were sued. It was a huge project. I also thought the timing of the phases could have been better managed. My street was ready and waiting for asphalt for a long, long time.. The follow up sewer washing came out of no where and I never did understand what was going on. The sewer washing should have been explained and residents warned that there would be yet another phase of the project going into cold weather and how long it would take. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? There is no drainage where the sidewalks join the street. There should be drainage there! The sidewalks at the corner of Dale and 58th were not usable all winter. They were an ice hazard. And it sent water/ice across the entire street so walking past that junction even in the street was a hazard. Anyone can see that drainage is needed. That is simply unacceptable design. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? The workers worked very hard and were courteous. The city engineers worked very hard to get back to people and answer questions. The black dirt was very helpful for restoring the yard. Generously repairing concrete driveway aprons was much appreciated. Having the chance to give feed back is appreciated also. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? The reconstruction of my street was a terrible experience. It ruined the summer of course. The noise and dust were awful. I paid $700 to have my windows washed. I also ended up with a $1,500 bill for suspension repairs to my Toyota. I had only 40,000 miles on the car and have never had suspension issues before but the huge holes in the street ruined both the shocks and the rocker arms. Now the railroad crossing on Hansen Road remains so bumpy I have to avoid it. Why couldn't that have been smoothed out? Respondent No:4 Login:Registered Responded At:Apr 30, 2022 19:39:47 pm Last Seen:May 01, 2022 02:27:47 am City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction It’s really important to tell residents when roads will be closed. There were a number of times where I found myself having to back up and try to find a other route out of the neighborhood. It was a requirement to leave extra early when leaving the house because we never knew if a road would be opened or closed and how nice the crew working the roads would be - there were times when workers intentionally blocked my way or made no effort to move out of the way, including assisting the school bus driver on the first day of school! Multiple kids didn’t get on the bus that day and the workers made no effort to make it easier on the bus driver on other days. That’s not OK, especially with the bus driver. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Hot topic. People are happy with the city paying 100% of the cost at some distant point in the future but we are being hit twice. It’s also frustrating/hard to not know how much we will be charged. I would never start a home improvement project without knowing the cost yet that’s really what the city did here. Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Road closure notices need to be worked on. They were lacking with this project. There should be a way to make sure residents are informed when they won’t have access to their driveways especially when the date or time of the blockage changes. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Keep trying to improve communication. It’s very much appreciated. Evan Acosta did a nice job responding to concerns & complaints. He has a tough job. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:5 Login:Registered Responded At:May 01, 2022 13:48:57 pm Last Seen:Jun 12, 2022 22:20:53 pm City Meetings Very Effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Very Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Somewhat effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Melody Lane was dirt for at least 5 months. Some of the ruts were so bad that our car and guests cars bottomed out and were damaged. For about a month we had to drive less than 5 miles an hour because the street was so rutted and bumpy. The mud was so thick some days that cars were stuck. A commercial truck was stuck in deep mud in front of my driveway for at least 3 hours. I was scared to drive on our street when it rained because I was afraid of getting stuck in the mud. Our cars were covered with thick mud for most of the summer, inside and out. I feel as though our street should have been demolished much closer to the time that is was repaved. It was an extremely long process that was pretty miserable from May until October. The house shook so badly during some of the construction that a large crack appeared the length of our dining room ceiling. I was unaware of the number of trucks that would use our street to get to other streets in the neighborhood. Some days, the large side dumpr trucks would drive by all day, one after the other, not sure where they were headed. I wish they would have taken other routes occasionally to get to where they were going. Evan was very responsive and helpful when I had issues with my furnace due to gas disconnection and with other issues. I always appreciated his quick response. Respondent No:6 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 07:40:11 am Last Seen:May 02, 2022 14:37:46 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:7 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 08:31:32 am Last Seen:May 02, 2022 15:14:21 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Flyer to communicate did sometimes get lost either among logs of mails / ads etc... because the card is rather small OR because a few time it was attached to door handle and flew away I think... Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Not at all effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Never received SMS - was it a thing? Why not email notifications and make sure every household is registered to receive the notifications.... Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues A few times I would have appreciated some warnings / explanation about the work being done on my front yard Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices see above comment Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? would be very beneficial to have a page easily accessible on the web where we can see the on going progress - what the construction team is up to that week / day etc.... the next days plan Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Overall it went ok - I did feel like communication was lacking though. For example right now, I am wondering what is up with the state of the lawn in the front yards in my street. the soil is little bit collapsed where the crew dug + it was re-seeded in the fall but it is just weeds basically growing... is there a plan to fix this? Respondent No:8 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 09:48:49 am Last Seen:May 02, 2022 16:38:10 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction The specific dates for closures, work affecting our house or street should have been more clear and timely. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction More frequent and more accurate notices for work affecting our house and street are needed. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues You need to have someone who has a better understanding of all aspects of construction in order to effectively supervise this complex of a project. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Residents need more time than a few hours for hot water shutoff (gas meter replacement). You need to manage road closures better. There were a few times when access to our house was impossible, even for emergency vehicles, due to too many different road construction projects being done at once. That is not acceptable from a safety standpoint. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Hire someone who can properly manage a project of that size and complexity. Provide better notices. If the subs fail on proper notification, the City is still ultimately responsible for proper notification and coordination. Also make sure to have all required permits approved before beginning (rail road crossing on Hanson) Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop trying to do too much at once. Our area was originally supposed to be done in 2 phases, then got condensed into one phase due to one vocal resident. Then the whole project suffered. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Keep working to get it completed ASAP. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Get this project wrapped up ASAP. It was started over a year ago, and it is not yet complete. Respondent No:9 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 10:56:32 am Last Seen:May 02, 2022 17:32:05 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Please send residents a letter well in advance of the project starting. I was not aware of the project until they starting digging on my property. Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Either mailing notices, or door hanging, or verbally notifying me or a message on my telephone. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Send me a letter notifying me how projects are funded. Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues I was informed they needed to come into my house and turn off the water. My basement was flooded after they left for the day caused extensive damage. They need to be careful entering homes so they don't cause damage. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices They should provide ample notice to the neighborhood for these things even two days would be good. Homeowners should not just wake up to a mountain of dirt in front of my driveway and I could not get out with my car. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Hire people who care to do a good job when they enter people's homes and not damage their property. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? They came into my house to turn off the water. After they left, my basement flooded because water was coming from the ceiling. It cost a lot of work and a lot of money to clean up the damage they created. I called the owner of the contracting company and he told me they are not responsible for the damage, he told me that's why I have insurance. I contacted my insurance and I had to pay a $2500 deductible. I was very upset for the whole time it took to clean and restore my home after the damage they caused. My belongings had be packed up and placed in storage, the damaged carpet had to be removed and replaced. This process took the whole summer. To this day they never repaired the hole that they opened in my front lawn. Respondent No:10 Login:Registered Responded At:May 02, 2022 15:34:56 pm Last Seen:May 02, 2022 22:16:17 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction We only received 2 notices of meetings for the project. One a couple years ago and one the year before. Not a lot of communicating as far as when it was going to happen, what was going to happen, where the sidewalk was going in, how much they would be intrusive in my yard, driveway, etc. Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction They only communication I received during construction was the door hanger notices. One day they had to come in to shut off my water main. Luckily I was home so I could move all my storage out from under my stairs and let a worker into my house so he could turn it off. I never knew when they were going to be working in front of my house or which way I could leave my house to get to a main road to get to school and work. Very poor communication of what was happening with the project. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Tell us. Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Nobody asked. I had to call the city and speak with the project manager many times to ask questions and figure out what was happening. Nobody told me that I was going to get a fire hydrant put in at the end of my driveway or a no parking sign. No my driveway is used for a bus stop. I wasn't aware that any of this was going to happen. The whole mailbox issue was a mess also. They put my mailbox on the ground in my yard and the mailman would deliver mail to the box. It wasn't very clear if our mail was going to the temporary boxes or the one on the ground. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Many times they would knock on my door and tell me I couldn't use my driveway the next couple days or that if I wanted to get out at all that day, I need to move my car now. I was lucky that I work part time and was able to run out and move my car and be flexible. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? The sidewalk abruptly ends on Hansen road before the RR tracks. There's black tar that looks thrown down. No curb. It's just there. Same with the other side of the RR on Hansen. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? The workers left water bottles, pop bottles, cigarette butts, garbage in the yards. They are probably buried underneath the dirt. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? When are they going to come back and take all the flags out of our yards? Are they going to add grass seed or turf to where my property ends and the city begins? Are they going to fill in holes in the yard with dirt? A water drain is exposed next to the fire hydrant. Needs dirt filled in. Caution tape still in the yards. There is a huge pile of brush on the west side of Hansen road by the RR tracks. Is anyone going to clean this up? Respondent No:11 Login:Registered Responded At:May 03, 2022 09:29:09 am Last Seen:May 03, 2022 16:21:52 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? My new driveway skirt is cracked and already separating from my driveway. Backfill/grading from new curb area into my yard was not done well. Seeding was not the greatest and likewise I needed to do additional seeding this past fall. Irrigation contractor the city uses is inconsiderate, rude and communication is terrible. I would NEVER do business with this individual. Respondent No:12 Login:Registered Responded At:May 04, 2022 07:07:38 am Last Seen:May 04, 2022 14:04:41 pm City Meetings Very Effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Very Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction None Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates Very Effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction None Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded None Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? We still have not received seeding for our property following construction last year. Wondering when we can expect that. In addition, our driveway apron did not survive the winter and already has a massive crack. I'm hoping this will be addressed. Respondent No:13 Login:Registered Responded At:May 04, 2022 08:28:24 am Last Seen:May 04, 2022 15:07:49 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Since we were delayed for one year because the project was made bigger it was tough to remember what we had been told at the City Meetings. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Somewhat effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction There were too many moving parts & some workers were not considerate of the people living in the neighborhood. The street in front of my house was a staging area all during the project from Apr thru Nov. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Once I started communicating with Evan & Arli they understood my issues but it would have helped if the doers would have understood how cumbersome they were making my yard maintenance. Plus I felt like I no longer had a yard since multiple times the doers would eat breakfast & lunch under my locust tree in the front yard. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices We never knew what roads were open to get in & out. Many times we would try one way then have to backtrack & try another way. Hanson Road is still a problem since Windsor was delayed til this spring & the area at the rail road tracks has not yet been done. With all of the contractors in my area for this project & for neighbor's projects there was never enough parking -- one time I came home to find one of them parked on the new sidewalk along my property on 56th St. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? This project was too big for one year. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Improve on communications with actual detail updates instead of general updates. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? The curbs are already showing wear especially at 56th & Dale Ave plus my new front steps already have a chunk that has chipped out. Respondent No:14 Login:Registered Responded At:May 04, 2022 12:45:15 pm Last Seen:May 04, 2022 19:42:43 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Disappointed in what our grass looks like this year. Our project went into the fall so no time for things to take seed. We now have a huge swatch of dirt because nothing is growing. And because we live on a corner it surrounds us on each side. Would have appreciated the city coming out in the spring to reseed. Respondent No:15 Login:Registered Responded At:May 04, 2022 15:24:58 pm Last Seen:May 04, 2022 22:22:40 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:16 Login:Registered Responded At:May 06, 2022 07:16:58 am Last Seen:May 06, 2022 14:00:41 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction The City needs to do better at soliciting resident's feedback on proposed and upcoming projects. One mailer being sent out is not enough. And the lack of response to the email I sent after receiving that mailer, was, at a minimum, discouraging and in actuality, ridiculous. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded If residents are getting assessed for non-essential things like sidewalks things, the City MUST get majority-approval from them. Telling someone they have no choice to pay for something that actually decreases accessibility around their home due to the insanely narrow roads we now have is an abuse of power. Fixing roads and replacing sewers is one thing, putting in non-essential things - and doing a terrible job of it - is not something residents should be forced to pay for. Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues They need to actually sit outside/drive around and do research on the neighborhoods - traffic flow, mail delivery patterns and needs, pedestrian traffic, etc... It was obvious this wasn't done prior to any recommendations or the actual construction. Due to the fact that our curb wasn't designed so that a mail truck could easily come onto the sidewalk to deliver our mail to our mailbox, we have actually had a mail truck smash into our retaining wall. In addition, the use of asphalt next to concrete for sidewalk entrances, some curbs, and filler between the sidewalk and retaining walls is not only an eyesore but will also crumble, have weeds grow in it, and generally look even worse than it does now in the near future. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices They consistently blocked our driveway in the morning with no notice before we could get kids out the door. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Actually strive to get resident feedback - lots of it - and then read it and actually consider it. We're the ones that have to live with your poorly researched or pie in the sky decisions. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop adding sidewalks everywhere! Edina is not a town where people walk and bike everywhere - you need to do a better job of balancing pedestrian safety with flow of traffic since most everyone drives. And while it seems to make sense to add a sidewalk to all busy roads, you need to consider if a quieter road should actually be the one that receives the sidewalk so that it truly is safer for pedestrians and the main thoroughfare isn't considerably narrowed - especially if people park on that road - for cars. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Replace old sewer pipes and upkeep roads. Actually finish the sidewalks with concrete, not asphalt. We look worse than Minneapolis. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? I would love to have someone actually come out and see the end result of the project and then tell me how they're going to fix the issues created by it. Respondent No:17 Login:Registered Responded At:May 09, 2022 09:18:30 am Last Seen:May 09, 2022 16:17:02 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:18 Login:Registered Responded At:May 10, 2022 13:14:28 pm Last Seen:May 10, 2022 19:53:54 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Better mailed notices of upcoming plans. More user friendly website. Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Somewhat effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Communication regarding complaints, concerns, or general statuses or next stage updates was poor. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Seek more community involvement and feedback. Read, assess, and respond to community feedback. Don't simply overrule every concern that the individuals paying for the project are raising. Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues If a problem occurs multiple times, proactively work with the contractor to prevent it from happening again. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access Yes Roadway access No Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Roadway access was poorly updated and enforced by the city. Often times 'closed' roads were closed, and 'open' roads were closed. Enforce roadway notices on contractors. Additionally, if residents are filing the same complaint repeatedly, i.e. inattentive/overly destructive work, investigate the contractor. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Notify residents of next steps, concern hotlines, etc. As of May 10, our yard is disaster, our water pressure is not stable, and our driveway is cracked. It took 2 attempts reaching out to get any prospective timeline on restoration. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop narrowing roads and making them more dangerous for non-motorized road users. I.e. roads without sidewalks are now ~8 feet narrower and if vehicles park on 1 side there is hardly any space for vehicles and bikes/pedestrians/etc. If cars park on both sides, the road is hardly wider than 1 vehicle width. Stop leaving home owners in the dark. I had to contact the city multiple times to receive updates/guidance on when our property would be restored. Stop making intersections more dangerous for ALL users (looking at 56th St & Dale specifically). What person signed off on intentionally creating a difficult visibility intersection in the name of 'green space'? Was the goal to make it more dangerous for pedestrians, bicyclists, & drivers? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? The communication, timeline, and overall experience of this project was terrible. Communication from the City of Edina was almost non-existent. After this project our property is now worse than before. The experience of living on an 'updated' road is also worse. Traffic travels at the same speed as before to include city contractors (i.e. waste disposal and school bus drivers), but now the road is more dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists due to its narrower width. Our yard is still trashed our 'new' driveway apron is cracked/uplifted after ~8 months, and our water pressure has been unstable since the 'improvement'. Overall, I'm not impressed with the project goals, execution, or quality of the work that our ~$14k assessment has returned. Respondent No:19 Login:Registered Responded At:May 10, 2022 13:33:08 pm Last Seen:May 10, 2022 20:25:00 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? The water hydrant in front of our home has been overused and was still being used yesterday May 9. many trucks pulled into up to the fire hydrant at 12:30 and 2:00 AM we had stopped counting at 600 trucks . many of the trucks left water running and all over the street and in October and into November it was freezing and created a lot of icy patches. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? It was a tough project and many of the maps were not accurate and caused some delays,however, the crews were considerate and helpful. Our tree replacement arrived May 9th and we are grateful ! Respondent No:20 Login:Registered Responded At:May 10, 2022 14:08:56 pm Last Seen:May 10, 2022 21:01:32 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction I didn't realize you had text communication. That seems a good idea. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Having one step where the contractor did was dig up the old gas line. This is an illustration of the importance of coordinating with all the services. I know Utilities are notorious for difficult coordination and policies but it seemed very inefficient to have a trench dug in a street with all that happened was the old gas main was removed. Maybe the pipe could have been filed with grout and left in place? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Evan and his team of consulting engineers did a nice job of communicating. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Respondent No:21 Login:Registered Responded At:May 11, 2022 10:52:10 am Last Seen:May 11, 2022 17:43:49 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Continue to offer the ability to attend meetings online. Also, apparently one person or a small group of people delayed construction for a year. Why wasn't the entire neighborhood asked if they wanted the project delayed. Because of rising interest rates, this restoration is now going to cost my family more money! Mailed Correspondences N/A Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction We received notice that our water was going to be cut off but it did not happened. The actual cut off happened about a week later, but we were notified by an individual knocking on the door who did not know about the prior notification. Have the various departments co-ordinate their work. I do not remember receiving a notice of how to hook up my sump pump line to the sump pump drain being installed. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded It is my understanding that future road restoration projects will be funded by taxes. I am one of the lucky ones who will still have to pay for part of the restoration. Please select a response.N/A Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Dale Avenue construction was completed in November of 2021. We are still waiting to the ground to be leveled and seeded. No communication has been received about when this will happen. I find that follow-up to restoring residential property to its original condition is lacking. Respondent No:22 Login:Registered Responded At:May 15, 2022 13:16:23 pm Last Seen:May 15, 2022 20:07:16 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction We lost water w/o notification because the engineering dep. didn't realize where our watermain came from. Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? NOT happy about the reconstruction of the lawn and mailbox. Respondent No:23 Login:Registered Responded At:May 16, 2022 14:18:10 pm Last Seen:May 16, 2022 20:53:00 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Full schedule of project with GANTT chart of subcontractors should be available. Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Somewhat effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Clear display and updates of the overall schedule including subcontractors. Updated GANTT charts each week need to be displayed. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Project manager should not relay communication from residents to a subcontractor. Speaking with one of the subcontractors did not allow me to be aware of the activities of another group. When asked if the irrigation lines I had just installed would be damaged the subcontractor told me that his group would not touch them as long as they were marked. The were then destroyed a week later by the gas company. I asked the subcontractor why this had happened and he said, "It wasn't us. I didn't lie to you". The project manager should be the main point of contact to prevent this from happening. Water Shut-off(s)No Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop replacing destroyed lawns with cheap, highway ditch-grade seed. The yard needs to be re-graded with additional dirt and sodded. This grass doesn't fill well for over a year and needs a lot of work after its installed. Its just more money and time that i don't want to spend on something I've already invested time and money on. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? The actual road construction is done well. The subcontractors who are responsible for laying curb and blacktop do a great job. The sprinkler tech also does a great job of communicating with me when its time for him to get started at the end of the project. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? I've been through 2 of these road construction projects in the past 3 years and it has been an awful experience with poor communication and even worse replacement of what was damaged. My lawn has been run over with trucking equipment, had holes left in it from excavation, a cone was left buried in it for over 2 months, electric lines were cut and not reconnected for the sprinkler systems unbeknownst to me, exterior stone work was damaged from vibrations, plants died in the summer heat due to damaged irrigation and weed heavy grass seed was used to replace the professionally installed lawn that was excavated. I've invested a lot of time and money in fixing what was damaged over and over during the past 3 years and I'm still not done. I would inform neighbors not to invest anything in improving their curb appeal if they have a project like this scheduled as it has the potential to be destroyed. Respondent No:24 Login:Registered Responded At:May 19, 2022 08:31:42 am Last Seen:May 19, 2022 15:13:50 pm City Meetings Very Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Very Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Make sure they are accurate and updated as necessary. There was one instance where the work did not take place after we had received door hangers (sewer relining, I believe) and we had been warned not to run water or flush toilets. Then when the work did take place, they showed up and began without advance notice. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Slow down the trucks! Dust and noise are two of the bigger issues with road construction. When the pickups and construction vehicles go flying down the unpaved streets on their way to where the work is being done, they kick up a lot of dust. Please ask them to slow down out of consideration to the residents. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Keep up the good communication. Evan Acosta did an excellent job of answering questions, both onsite and through email. I also thought that the construction crews were very friendly and willing to answer questions, and try to accommodate our needs, if possible. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Glad it's over!! :-) Respondent No:25 Login:Registered Responded At:May 20, 2022 07:04:25 am Last Seen:Jun 22, 2022 17:58:54 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? The project went well, but the lack of reseeding of the lawns in the neighborhood has been frustrating and disappointing. Lawns that should have reseeded weeks ago, are now grown up in weeds that should be tilled before seeding. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Evan Acosta was great to deal with when issues came up during the project. He was responsive to calls and emails. His attention to detail was greatly appreciated. Please take care of the weeds and the reseeding of our lawns! Respondent No:26 Login:Registered Responded At:May 25, 2022 08:27:39 am Last Seen:May 25, 2022 15:17:03 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Better communication about homeowner options for driveway and water line replacement in coordination with the street & sewer replacement project Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction More mailings with updates about costs and timelines Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded More mailings with updates about costs and timelines Please select a response.N/A Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Finish the job. Our road -- Dale Avenue -- still has no grass and now unsightly weeds have taken root. Sprayed grass seed never took hold in the fall. This should have been addressed as soon as warm enough to reseed or put in sod. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop charging residents for the costs of roads. That's what our high taxes should go towards before other city improvements. Edina seems more concerned with how we look to visitors rather than taking care of long-time residents. Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Improving the roads in Edina. Some are absolutely awful and pose risk to auto damage by driving on them. Eden Ave and Benton Ave between Hansen Road and Tracy Ave are perfect examples. Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? I'm pleased to have a street that no longer poses risk to my cars by driving on it in the poor condition it was in. I'm unhappy about my yard being damaged in several places and not restored to a reasonable condition. Respondent No:27 Login:Registered Responded At:May 27, 2022 09:24:19 am Last Seen:May 27, 2022 16:22:17 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Very Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction None- the website was great Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Very Effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded IT remains unclear to me how this project will officially be funded, given that this project is still being completed in 2022. Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? City engineer team was very responsive and professional. Great work. Respondent No:28 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 07, 2022 08:21:58 am Last Seen:Jul 07, 2022 15:15:42 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences N/A Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction text message updates when ever possible/ something new (a few a week) Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? not answered Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Over all pleased... with covid related delays on materials..project took longer than it should have... also the need to keep intersections open the one down by Melody Lake was opened and filled back in at least four times... I would have preferred the area closed off for a day or two longer and just have everything done at one time... I'm guessing for scheduling this isn't possible, but it would have made things go smoother.... Respondent No:29 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 07, 2022 18:32:38 pm Last Seen:Jul 08, 2022 00:35:09 am City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Very Effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction not answered Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Very Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction not answered Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded not answered Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues not answered Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Please plant grass and remove plastic barriers by the lake as soon as possible. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Fixing the grass Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Please plant grass and remove plastic barriers by the lake as soon as possible. Thank you! Respondent No:30 Login:Admin Responded At:Aug 02, 2022 12:26:55 pm Last Seen:Sep 21, 2022 14:10:05 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction City website on construction status was not always up to date and sometimes was not informative as to what to expect the following week. Mailed Correspondences Very Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Evan Acosta was very prompt ad informative when I emailed him for information. Door hangers were often late. They need to be put out the day before. Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Adequate information is available on Edina Website. Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues The team was informed I had mobility issues and they did everything they could to accommodate me. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Yes but sometimes could have been earlier notices. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? It was a big project and at times it seemed to be on hold. No work happening. Other times the left and right were not in sync. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? not answered Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? not answered Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Better coordination between contractors and utility work. Melody Lake A & B, Birchcrest C, and Grandview A Creek Knoll A & B October 6, 2022 Location – Melody Lake A & B Birchcrest C Grandview A www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Location – Creek Knoll A & B www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Number of Respondents Neighborhood Response Rate Melody Lake A & B Birchcrest C 11%279 Sent Grandview A 30 Responded Creek Knoll A & B 17%109 Sent 19 Responded www.EdinaMN.gov 4 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Response Rate Year Response Rate 2015 26% 2016 29% 2017 14% 2018 15% 2019 8% 2020 23% 2021 13% 5 How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? www.EdinaMN.gov 6 2019 2018 2017 2016 63%70%68%69% 74%79%82%81% 63%52%70%67% 2020 46% 52% 54% 2021 58% 63% 59%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Meetings Letters Website Melody Lake/Birchcrest/Grandv iew Creek Knoll How effective was the communication you received during construction? www.EdinaMN.gov 7 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 58%52%70%75%76%77% 53%49%65%63%81%77% 57%55%64%53%63%65% 52%*62%*58%*70%72%63% *New in 2019 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Letters Better Together Updates Door Notices Text Messages Melody Lake/Birchcrest/Gr andview Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? www.EdinaMN.gov 8 2021*2020*2019*2017 2016 2015 Yes 63%53%85%55%59%62% No 37%47%15%45%41%38% *Question reworded in 2019 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Yes No During construction, how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Very effective to Somewhat effective 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 70%51%66%69%75%74% 61% 62% 63% 64% 65% 66% 67% 68% 69% 70% 71% Melody Lake/Birchcrest/Gran dview Creek Knoll www.EdinaMN.gov 10 During construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Water Shut- off(s) 78%93%72%88%81%80% Driveway Access 79%73%62%73%81%85% Roadway Access 74%73%53%83%87%80% Parking 82%82%54%81%90%89% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% Melody Lake/Birchcrest /Grandview Creek Knoll Suggestion for Improvements on construction notices? Be consistent.Status Update. Tell residents when roads will be closed. More frequent and more accurate notices. There were too many moving parts & some workers were not considerate of the people living in the neighborhood. Clear display and updates of the overall schedule. More mailings.Go door to door to address concerns. Door hangers placed a few days ahead of time. Update residents even if no work is going to be happening.More timely as to impact to home owner’s property and remedies to damage. www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Do you have any suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Better communication through text alerts about timing of everything. Meet and change plans based on resident concerns. Do better on daily updates. Listen and use resident input. Hire better contractors and hold them to a higher standard. Complete one project before giving priority to the next. Project was too big. Have a page easily accessible with updates. Slow down the trucks. Lack of reseeding lawns has been frustrating and disappointing. Finish the job. www.EdinaMN.gov 12 Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Stop putting in sidewalks residents don’t want. Stop trying to do too much at once. Hire people who care. Stop narrowing roads. Stop replacing destroyed lawns with cheap, highway ditch-grade seed. Stop charging residents for the costs of roads. Being too general and vague in communication. Stop storing old pipes in front of people’s houses. Please don’t promise & not follow through. www.EdinaMN.gov 13 Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? On-site facetime with the project manager and construction manager was invaluable. Your subs were great. The website and comment section is good and helps with accessibility to city employees. Keep neighbors up to date on timeline. Keep trying to improve communication. Keep working to get it completed ASAP. www.EdinaMN.gov 14 Do you have any general comments related to the project? The noise and dust were horrible. Curbs are already starting to show wear. The communication, timeline, and overall experience of this project was terrible. It was a tough project and many of the maps were not accurate and caused some delays. Not happy about the reconstruction of the lawn and mailbox. I'm pleased to have a street that no longer poses risk to my cars by driving on it in the poor condition it was in. City engineer team was very responsive and professional.I was impressed with the professionalism of every individual member of the team I encountered. www.EdinaMN.gov 15 Turf Restoration •Staff is working on a recommendation for future street reconstruction. •$200 water bill credit. •Back to council prior to the 2023 Project Public Hearing •Council Approved Policy •Considering the Triple Bottom Line –City and Residents •Financial •Social •Environmental www.EdinaMN.gov 16 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Public Hearing: Resolution No. 2022-88 50th & France Special Assessments, Improvement No. M- 22 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon October 10 and to continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council Meeting . INTRODUCTION: The City provides service to the 50th & France Business District. T hese services include general maintenance and upkeep performed by City employees and management of contracts for other repairs as needed. Services include waste and litter removal, snow and ice management, and upkeep to City-owned spaces throughout the district. Attached you will find a Resolution, Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, and Certificate of Mailing including the Notice of Public Hearing, and other supporting documentation for each proposed assessment. All properties were notified per Minnesota State Statute – Chapter 429 for special assessments. Staff included in the Notice of Public Hearing an invoice for each assessment. The 50th & France Business District maintenance assessment changed from $0.91 per square foot in 2021 to $0.95 per square foot in 2022. The increase can be attributed to additional maintenance requirements of the Nolan Mains Complex, COVID precautions, tree replacement and structural repairs to the South Parking Ramp due to vehicular damage. As of this writing no comments have been submitted or called in. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-88: 50th & France Certificate of Mailing Assessment Roll Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2022-88 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: 50th and France Business District – Improvement No. M-22 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in one installment, together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2022. NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENT 50th and France Business District Levy No. 22036 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 21, 2022 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 22, 2022. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 18th day of October 2022. ATTEST: _____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date, September 20, 2022, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for the 50th & France Business District, Improvement and Maintenance No. M-20 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 14 days prior to the date of the hearing. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 20th day of September 2022. Edina City Clerk PID LAST NAME ADDRESS1 CITY STATE ZIP ASSESSMENT 18-028-24-14-0016 WILLIAM C KNAPP 5000 WESTOWN PKWAY #400 WEST DES MOINES,IA 50266 7,747.84 18-028-24-14-0024 49.5 LLC-G.Mikan 5021 Vernon Ave #252 EDINA,MN 55410 3,847.26 18-028-24-14-0108 Edina Properties, Inc. C/o Jennifer Kent 4100 W. 50th Street EDINA,MN 55425 2,553.42 18-028-24-14-0135 FRANK HOLDINGS LLC 5223 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD EDINA,MN 55439 10,942.00 18-028-24-14-0134 Benefit Design Assoc.,LLC 4924 France Ave. So.EDINA,MN 55410 2,193.54 18-028-24-14-0136 4936 France Avenue LLC 5353 Wayzata Blvd. #650 Minneapolis,MN 55416 4,646.04 18-028-24-14-0118 OMG PROPERTIES LLC 4930 FRANCE AVE S EDINA,MN 55410 4,348.05 18-028-24-14-0020 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP c/o KCS Property Mgmt 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 6,206.46 18-028-24-14-0021 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP c/o KCS Property Mgmt 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 10,847.74 18-028-24-14-0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 29,962.20 18-028-24-14-0122 Buhl Carillon LLC Attn: Peter Denovic 5100 Eden Ave Ste. 317 EDINA,MN 55436 13,395.45 18-028-24-14-0121 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 12,338.67 18-028-24-14-0126 L.A. Real Estate Group ETAL 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 76,416.90 18-028-24-14-0046 First Building Corp. c/o U S Bank NA 2800 E. LAKE ST.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 20,202.66 18-028-24-14-0045 First Building Corp. c/o U S Bank NA 2800 E. LAKE ST.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 3,191.30 18-028-24-14-0144 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 5,008.77 18-028-24-14-0145 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 4,699.36 18-028-24-14-0142 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 26,508.14 18-028-24-41-0178 Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 17,521.67 18-028-24-41-0182 A K LARSON FAMILY LLC 3939 50TH ST W #200 EDINA,MN 55424 37,782.40 18-028-24-41-0050 50th Street Plaza LLC Attn: Paster Dev.5320 W. 23rd Street #205 St. Louis Park,MN 55416 11,259.03 18-028-24-41-0049 50th Street Plaza LLC Attn: Paster Dev.5320 W. 23rd Street #205 St. Louis Park,MN 55416 23,544.38 18-028-24-41-0052 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 30,869.55 18-028-24-41-0383 5000 FRANCE COMPANY 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, #108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 21,167.10 18-028-24-41-0055 FRANCE AT 50TH LLC 7800 METRO PKWY #300 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 15,583.28 18-028-24-41-0066 5036 FRANCE PROP.LLC Attn: Ryan Burnet 5036 FRANCE AVE S EDINA,MN 55410 7,051.89 18-028-24-41-0237 5050 France Ave. LLC Attn:E.Gerald O'Brien II 3948 Market Street EDINA,MN 55424 12,664.27 18-028-24-41-0181 CITY OF EDINA Edina Liquor Store 4801 50TH ST W EDINA,MN 55424 8,161.04 The CITY of EDINA FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS 50th Street & France Avenue Business District 2021 Maintenance Improvement NO. M-22 October 6, 2022 The CITY of EDINALocation Map: www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Shaded Areas: Private Business Footprint The CITY of EDINAAssessment Costs: M-22 Assessable Costs : $430,660.37 Assessable Sq. Footage: 452,347 SF Proposed Assessment: $0.95/Sq. Ft. *2021 Assessable Costs $411,861.27 *2021 Assessable Sq. Footage: 452,347 SF Increase attributed to Tree Repalacment, Structural Repairs and COVID Precautions www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINARecommendation: CONTINUE PH UNTIL OCT. 12 CONSIDER APPROVAL ON OCT. 18 APPROVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-88 IMPROVEMENT NO. M-22 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: VIII.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2022-93 Certificate of Appropriateness Appeal, 4633 Arden Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon October 10 and to continue action on the item to the October 18 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Scott Busyn, the applicant, is appealing the denial of an amended Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The proposed COA amendment was for changes to the building materials and changes to the front facing facade, which includes windows and the dormer. Better Together Edina Comments ATTACHMENTS: Description Applicant Appeal Letter Draft Resolution No. 2022-93 April 13, 2021 Original COA Submittal, staff report, consultant memo, COA and minutes July 12, 2022 COA Amendment Submittal, staff report, consultant memo, minutes August 11 COA Amendment Submittal, staff report, consultant memo, minutes Better Together Report GNH Attorney's Letter to City Council Sept 13, 2022 COA Denial Appeal Presentation Staff Presentation Attorney Presentation September 27, 2022 Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Appeal of Denial of Certificate of Appropriateness 4633 Arden Avenue Dear Mayor and City Council Members: We are writing to provide background for our appeal of the HPC’s decision to deny our amended COA request for the approval of three elements: (1) approval of replacement of failed and failing brick cladding with Tundrabrick; (2) installation of a small window on the house’s second floor; and (3) a small expansion of an existing dormer. Our company, Great Neighborhood Homes, has renovated or built 7 homes in the Country Club District. We have also lived in the District since 2009 and recently became empty nesters. Main level living homes are virtually non-existent in Country Club. We sold our large family home at 4615 Wooddale and purchased 4633 Arden Avenue with the intent of rehabilitating a smaller home for ourselves that would accommodate main level living while still being able to live in the District. We were excited about this opportunity to create an empty nester home for ourselves while maintaining the historic character of the home. We were advised by the Planning Department that we needed a COA for the changes we were making to the front of the home. We applied for an obtained a COA for the changes to the front of the home on 4/13/21. We then commenced with blueprints and structural work needed to obtain a building permit. The structural, flashing, and insulation requirements of the remodeled dormer required it to be slightly larger than the dormer approved on the COA We applied for an obtained a building permit on 10/18/21. Planning and Building Department reviewed the submitted permit plans and said nothing about the slightly larger dormer. It is common for small structural adjustments to be made to meet code requirements on remodeling projects. With the building permit issued we started remodeling work on existing home. We started removing the exterior brick from the rear and sides of home. We realized that the existing brick was deteriorated and that there was an insufficient weather barrier to maintain a drainage plane behind the existing brick. The one layer of building paper was crumbling and brittle. The paper had insufficient coverage as it was not lapped properly in a waterfall fashion (reverse lapped in several areas). The paper was not nailed sufficiently and had nail holes. There was also no flashing over the windows. We continued to remove brick and realized the inadequate weather barrier was an issue on the front of the home as well. The front brick was also deteriorated and crumbling so could not be reused like we had intended. I provided photos of these conditions on the amended COA. We did not believe removing the existing brick was a problem as The Plan of Treatment for the Country Club District (POT) clearly states that a COA is not required for “removal of existing siding, roofing, trim, fascia, soffit, eave moldings, windows, and doors.” We then worked on finding a replacement brick that would be compatible with the POT while being efficient and durable to today’s code and standards. We also wanted a white brick look which is found in the District. Our masonry suppler, Hedberg, advised us that using the same brick is not feasible under today’s building code. The only thing available is a reclaimed Chicago brick that does not comply with today’s standard for construction (grade SW) as it has a higher absorption rate than brick that are manufactured today. We selected a product called Tundrabrick because 1) The Tundrabrick material duplicates the original brick as close as possible among options we considered. The Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation states that If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible, then a compatible substitute material may be considered. The Plan of Treatment states "Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. “ The tundra brick, when installed, will have the same face height, width, depth and texture as the old brick. It also has the same design with a tumbled and rough face look of the existing brick. Here is a photo of the tundrabrick on top of the existing brick (existing brick has been painted). 2. The tundra brick will allow us to achieve our goal of this home participating in Edina’s Climate Action Plan. Under Section 3 Building and Energy, Section BE2, the Climate Action Plan is to “Increase adoption of high performance building construction technology, achieving 5% net zero homes community wide by 2023. Per Edina’s Net Zero Guide p. 60-5 E5 Insulate for High Performance Efficiency: Appropriate insulation levels are one of the key considerations for achieving a high energy performance and cost effective Net Zero Energy home. An important concept in high performing building insulation is “continuous insulation (c.i.)” Continuous insulation focuses on the elimination of thermal bridging (heat transfer through framing materials). Per the Edina Net Zero Home Guide, the minimum exterior continuous insulation R factor for a wood framed wall is 12.5 per this table: Our plan for the Tundrabrick is to put 2 1/2 of rigid foam insulation on the exterior of the framing sheathing. This will achieve Edina’s minimum Net Zero goals for continuous insulation. This will also give the same brick depth as the original brick as it was installed in the house. The depth will allow for the same design as the original brick (height, width, depth, texture). It will also allow for the same brick design depth of inset windows, doors, corners, and original fine details (brick corbels). Here is a photo of the tundra brick with 2.5” of insulation over the original home brick: Regarding the compatibility of painted white brick homes in the neighborhood, there was some concern at the last HPC meeting that there weren’t other painted white brick homes in the neighborhood. Here are some photos of other painted brick homes in the neighborhood: We feel the Tundrabrick is the appropriate choice for the replacement of the existing brick. It is compatible with the Plan of Treatment in design, texture and color and blends in with the character of the district. The tundra brick will also allow us to participate in Edina’s Climate Action Plan. It is important to also note that the HPC and Plan of Treatment has set a precedent of allowing replacement of original exterior materials with modern construction materials throughout the District. Here are two examples 1) The POT and HPC allows replacement of wood clapboard siding with modern materials such as James Hardie fiber cement siding. James Hardie fiber cement siding looks the same as wood clapboard from the street even though it is made from a different material and has a thinner profile than wood clapboard siding. 2) The POT and HPC allow asphalt, plastic, and metal roof shingles to replace original slate or clay tile roofing. In fact, homeowner in the District can replace their siding or roofing with these materials without the requirement of a COA from the HPC. With these precedent in the District, it seems arbitrary and capricious that the HPC is not allowing us to use the Tundrabrick. We submitted the amended COA for approval at the 7/12/22 HPC meeting. At the meeting, Consultant Vogel presented his findings. He stated: “I have reviewed the request to amend the COA issued in 2021 construction of a new detached garage and exterior alterations at 4633 Arden Avenue in the Country Club District. The masonry conservation issues described by the applicant are commonly found in mid-century modern houses. The Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation (which are the required basis for all COA decisions) recommend repair rather than replacement of deteriorated brick “whenever possible”; the guidelines for applying the standards also recommend compliance with current building safety codes in such a manner that the essential character of a building is preserved intact. If the city’s building official determines that the deteriorated brick wall cladding at 4633 Arden cannot be repaired, replacement would be appropriate and the COA should be amended, with the following condition: that the new brick and mortar must match the old masonry in size (face height & length), composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. It is unlikely that the original face brick is still being manufactured. (The applicant should provide the HPC with samples of the existing brick as well as the Tundrabrick product referenced in Mr. Busyn’s letter in order to demonstrate the match.) With respect to the proposed addition of a small window in the front-facing gable wall, the visual impact of the change should be minimal and in my opinion compatible with the house’s original design. No historically important architectural details will be destroyed or obscured. “ We showed the HPC samples of the old brick and the replacement brick. We never received a determination from the Building official that the existing brick can be repaired, nor that he agrees the old weather barrier was deteriorated. He inspected the house and received my photos. It seems they missed this step and just keep saying we removed the brick without permission. At the meeting, The HPC did not want us to use the Tundrabrick. The main concern was the thickness of the brick even though the new brick was the same height, width, and texture as the original brick. The HPC then brought up the size change to the dormer so the amended COA decisions (brick, dormer, small window) were tabled until the 8/11/22 meeting. We again presented the amended COA at the 8/11/22 HPC Meeting for the replacement brick, the expanded dormer, and the small new window. We told the HPC that the expanded dormer was necessary for structural, flashing, and insulation requirements. The new small window being added to the front was to provide light for an upper level playroom for our future grandchildren. Consultant Vogel presented his professional opinion which stated: “In my professional opinion, the proposed façade alterations are minimal and compatible with the house’s original design. Attic windows and shed-roofed dormers are characteristic of homes inspired by the American Arts and Crafts Movement, which lasted from the 1880s until the 1920s. This type of dormer is actually quite common in the Country Club neighborhood, where it occurs as a minor decorative feature on both “period revival” (Colonial, Tudor and Mediterranean) and “mid-century modern” (Minimal Traditional, Neocolonial, and Ranch) style homes. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation allow for façade alterations on heritage resources so long as the new work preserves the features which are significant to the property’s historical, architectural and cultural values. Because no historic character defining architectural features will be destroyed or obscured by the new construction, the new window and enlarged dormer should be considered appropriate. Regarding replacement of the historic brick wall cladding, the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation state that deteriorated architectural features should be repaired, rather than replaced, “whenever possible”; however, if replacement is necessary, “the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities.” The best practice for replacing old brick is to use new brick that duplicates the old as closely as possible—this assumes that the actual historic brick used in the original construction is no longer available. It is unlikely that the face brick used in 1938 is still being manufactured.” Going against Consultant Vogel’s recommendations, The HPC voted to deny all three COA amendment requests. They did not provide and clear reasons how the changes did not meet the POT. We were told the changes needed to be ”exactly the same as the approved COA, ” that we were told that we could only use “the historic brick,” and that “the HPC was looking at this project more closely because of the history GNH has in the Country Club neighborhood.” Many disparaging comments were made about our company and work in the neighborhood. This was surprising as we have worked with HPC since 2005 and have rehabilitated or built 7 homes in the District and have always followed the guidelines of the POT and City Code. Based on the HPC’s denial of our three amended COA items, we are appealing to the City Council to approve our amended changes. We have shown that these changes meet the guidelines of the POT. These changes will allow us to create a functional home while maintaining the character of the District. Thank you for taking the time for considering this appeal. Scott and Margaret Busyn 4633 Arden Avenue RESOLUTION NO. 2022-93 DENYING AN AMENDED (COA) REQUEST FOR BUILDING MATERIALS AND CHANGES TO THE FRONT FAÇADE OF 4633 ARDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. requested an amendment to a previously approved certificate of appropriateness that included a change in building materials and changes to the street facing façade, including windows and the size of the front dormer. 1.02 On, July 12, 2022, the Heritage Preservation Commission held a meeting and continued the request to the August HPC meeting. Vote: 8 Ayes 0 Nay. 1.03 On, August 11th, 2022, the Heritage preservation Commission held a meeting and denied the proposed COA changes and approving option 2, modular winter mist full brick as the approved building material. Vote: 5 Ayes 1 Nay. 1.04 The Heritage Preservation Commission decision was appealed to the City Council on August 18, 2022. 1.05 The property is legally described as follows: THE SOUTH 30.00 FEET OF LOT 17 AND THE NORTH 28.00 FEET OF LOT 18, BLOCK 1, COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT FAIRWAY SECTION ADDITION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1.06 On October 6, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Denial is based on the following findings: 2.02 The existing brick was a distinguishing feature of the home. Tundrabrick does not match the features of the original brick in size, composition, design, color, texture or other visual qualities. The new material should be a brick material. 2.03 The original certificate of appropriateness was approved with the existing brick to remain on the house. The applicant removed the brick in violation of the approved certificate of appropriateness. 2.04 The approved modular winter mist full brick was most aligned with the plan of treatment and the secretary of the interior’s standards of rehabilitation. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-93 Page 2 2.05 The proposed changes to the dormer and windows on the first floor are not proportionate. 2.06 There was not information provided by the applicant showing that the dormer could not be engineered or designed to match the original certificate of appropriateness design. 2.07 The applicant did not provide information showing how the proposed changes met the Country Club Plan of Treatment. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the appeal of the decision of the heritage preservation commission on certificate of appropriateness amendment at 4633 Arden Avenue based on the findings above. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 18, 2022. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2022. _________________________________ City Clerk Busyn Residence 4633 Arden Avenue Narrative for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for Changes to Street Facing Façade and New Detached Garage We are doing a rehabilitation and addition to the home at 4633 Arden Avenue and are proposing changes to the street facing façade and a new detached garage at 4633 Arden Avenue. Existing Home The existing home is an expansion 1 ½ story English Cottage style home built in 1938. We will be rehabilitating the home and doing an addition which will include living space over the sunroom on the right side of the home. The changes being proposed for the street facing façade are as follows: • Raising the roof of the sunroom to allow for living space above. This roof will match the pitch and not exceed the height of the existing roof. This roof is set back considerably from the main roof of the home so will not alter the main roof line. Adding a dormer to this space. • We will be pulling the front entry 3’ 4” forward, replacing the deteriorating existing flat roof covered entry with a new covered entry roof that blends into the roofline of the front living room. • Replacing a small dormer with a shed dormer with 5 windows to the left side of the principal roof structure • Changing the front door to a door with sidelights. • Separating the front left pair of windows. • Adding a new chimney cap. Existing Home Street Facing Façade Changes to Street Facing Façade Material List: • Maintain existing brick • Exterior trim all prime wood with matching crown molding of existing home: • New Marvin Windows. • Wood Front Door • Horizontal lap siding on dormers • Wood posts for covered entry wrapped in Boral (synthetic wood) trim for durability. Match wood post bracket detail of existing home: These changes to the street facing façade meet the Plan of Treatment because we are creating a compatible use for the property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. Here are other examples of similar curved entry roofs and shed dormers on 1 ½ story homes in the district: New Detached Garage The existing home has a difficult to access, undersized attached garage which we will be removing and replacing it with a new detached garage. We are proposing a new detached garage in the southeast corner of the property. This is the best position as it nestles in behind the detached garage at the home to the south, is the furthest away from the yard for the home to the north, and will be the least visible from the street. The garage will be positioned for the doors to face north. This will allow for the lowest portion of the structure (eve) to be facing the home on Maple Road to the East. The home on Maple Road also has a door they use to get into the Country Club District. This garage position will allow neighbors to continue to access the door: View from new garage to the south View from new garage to the east Views from new garage to the home to the north The only adjacent detached garage in the District is at the home to the south and it measures 19.35’ high. There is a detached garage on Maple Road behind 4633 Arden (not in the District) that measures 18’ high The new detached garage will be 18’ high measured from average existing grade. Site Plan for home and garage: Materials list for new garage: • Reuse/match existing brick. Match corner details from home • Horizontal lap siding • Marvin windows • Exterior trim all prime wood with matching crown molding of existing home. • Steel garage doors with PVC overlay paintable trim and divided light windows. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXOU OU OU OUOUOUOUOU XXXXXXXXOUOUOUOUOUOUS S S S S S X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXOU OU OU OUOUOUOUOU XXXXXXXXOUOUOUOUOUS S S S S S REVIEW Plan - NOT for building purposes 03/31/2021 3:01:51 PM April 13, 2021 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Certificate of Appropriateness: 4633 Arden Avenue-Changes to Street Facing Facade Information / Background: The subject property, 4633 Arden Avenue is located on the east side of Arden Avenue, just north of Country Club Road. The existing home on the subject property was built in 1938 and is identified as an example of English Cottage style but classified as an American Colonial Cottage in the Country Club National Register nomination documents. The Certificate of Appropriateness request includes the construction of a new detached garage, a second-floor addition that is visible from the street facing façade, changes to the existing dormer on the street facing façade and changes to the entryway. Primary Issues: The project includes a new detached garage and there are proposed changes to the street facing façade which are the reasons why the proposed project requires a Certificate of Appropriateness. The Country Club District Plan of Treatment allows for the demolition and construction of a new garage with a Certificate of Appropriateness. Garages should match the architectural style of the house and the historic character of the neighborhood. New garages should be subordinate to the house and should be placed in the rear of the lot to minimize the visual impact on adjacent homes and streetscapes. The plan of treatment also suggests that undecorated exterior walls longer than 16 feet should be avoided on elevations visible from the street or adjacent properties. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel’s Comments: “I have reviewed the plans and supporting documents submitted in relation to the COA application for construction of a new detached garage and an exterior addition to the house at 4633 Arden Avenue in the Country Club District. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Built in 1938, the subject property is identified in the COA project narrative as an example of the “English Cottage style” but is classified as an “American Colonial Cottage” in the 1980 National Register nomination documents. I would categorize it as a Minimal Traditional house, which is described in McAlester’s Field Guide to American Houses as a “compromise style which reflects the form of traditional Eclectic houses but lacks their decorative detailing” (page 478). Inspired by a popular FHA small house prototype, this vernacular house form was widely built in suburban neighborhoods between about 1934 and 1955. Minimal Traditional style houses are not particularly well represented in the Country Club inventory and most surviving specimens were built after World War Two and are therefore not considered heritage preservation resources. Because the house at 4633 Arden Avenue was constructed in 1938, it was designed to meet the architectural standards contained in the developer’s original deed restrictions, which at that time were enforced by the Country Club’s homeowners association rather than Thorpe Bros. Realty. Thus, it meets the minimum requirements for a heritage preservation resource in the Country Club District on the basis of its age and association with the historical plan of development. One-and-one-half story houses are relatively uncommon in the Country Club District, where the predominant historic property types are two-story houses in the Anglo-American and Mediterranean period styles. It is worth noting that the Thorpe deed restrictions did not require houses in the district to be designed in any particular architectural style or built to a full two stories in height. Nevertheless, approximately 90% of the houses constructed between 1924 and 1944 are two-story Colonial or Tudor Revival style houses. I think it would be fair to say that the shift toward smaller houses in the district, already underway by 1938, should be recognized as evidence of the district’s history and development and that Minimal Traditional style houses should be treated as potential preservation resources whenever they possess the distinctive physical characteristics of the property type. The applicant plans to renovate and construct an addition to the existing home. Construction of a new detached garage is also proposed. The proposed exterior alterations, including changes to the front entrance and windows, are minimal and appear to be compatible with the house’s original design. Based on the plans presented, the changes to the sunroom also meet the general standards for rehabilitation—no significant architectural character defining features will be destroyed and the remodeled structure will be compatible with the size, scale, color and materials of the body of the house. The new shed-roofed dormers (on the principal and sunroom roofs), curved entry porch roof, and multi-pane replacement windows are also consistent with the Minimal Traditional style and are appropriate to the neighborhood streetscape. All of the new construction materials are appropriate to the house and in my opinion will not have an adverse effect on surrounding historic homes. Construction of new detached garages has been generally viewed as an appropriate undertaking in the Country Club District. In this case, no distinctive historic character defining features or materials will be destroyed and the new garage matches the exterior finishes and overall architectural character of the house. I recommend approval of the COA with the usual conditions.” STAFF REPORT Page 3 Staff Recommendation & Findings: Staff concurs with Consultant Vogel’s evaluation of the proposed plans at 4633 Arden Avenue, also recommending approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request. Findings supporting the recommendation include: • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness is consistent with the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Conditions for approval: • Any changes to the proposed plans would require review from the Heritage Preservation Commission. • An as-built date plaque is required on the new detached garage. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner FROM; Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant DATE: April 1, 2021 SUBJECT: COA for 4633 Arden Avenue I have reviewed the plans and supporting documents submitted in relation to the COA application for construction of a new detached garage and an exterior addition to the house at 4633 Arden Avenue in the Country Club District. Built in 1938, the subject property is identified in the COA project narrative as an example of the “English Cottage style” but is classified as an “American Colonial Cottage” in the 1980 National Register nomination documents. I would categorize it as a Minimal Traditional house, which is described in McAlester’s Field Guide to American Houses as a “compromise style which reflects the form of traditional Eclectic houses but lacks their decorative detailing” (page 478). Inspired by a popular FHA small house prototype, this vernacular house form was widely built in suburban neighborhoods between about 1934 and 1955. Minimal Traditional style houses are not particularly well represented in the Country Club inventory and most surviving specimens were built after World War Two and are therefore not considered heritage preservation resources. Because the house at 4633 Arden Avenue was constructed in 1938, it was designed to meet the architectural standards contained in the developer’s original deed restrictions, which at that time were enforced by the Country Club’s homeowners association rather than Thorpe Bros. Realty. Thus, it meets the minimum requirements for a heritage preservation resource in the Country Club District on the basis of its age and association with the historical plan of development. One-and-one-half story houses are relatively uncommon in the Country Club District, where the predominant historic property types are two-story houses in the Anglo-American and Mediterranean period styles. It is worth noting that the Thorpe deed restrictions did not require houses in the district to be designed in any particular architectural style or built to a full two stories in height. Nevertheless, approximately 90% of the houses constructed between 1924 and 1944 are two-story Colonial or Tudor Revival style houses. I think it would be fair to say that the shift toward smaller houses in the district, already underway by 1938, should be recognized as evidence of the district’s history and development and that Minimal Traditional style houses should be treated as potential preservation resources whenever they possess the distinctive physical characteristics of the property type. The applicant plans to renovate and construct an addition to the existing home. Construction of a new detached garage is also proposed. The proposed exterior alterations, including changes to the front entrance and windows, are minimal and appear to be compatible with the house’s original design. Based on the plans presented, the changes to the sunroom also meet the general standards for rehabilitation—no significant architectural character defining features will be destroyed and the remodeled structure will be compatible with the size, scale, color and materials of the body of the house. The new shed-roofed dormers (on the principal and sunroom roofs), curved entry porch roof, and multi-pane replacement windows are also consistent with the 2 Minimal Traditional style and are appropriate to the neighborhood streetscape. All of the new construction materials are appropriate to the house and in my opinion will not have an adverse effect on surrounding historic homes. Construction of new detached garages has been generally viewed as an appropriate undertaking in the Country Club District. In this case, no distinctive historic character defining features or materials will be destroyed and the new garage matches the exterior finishes and overall architectural character of the house. I recommend approval of the COA with the usual conditions. April 23, 2021 Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. 3939 W 50th Street Ste 103a Edina, MN 55424 Re: File # H-21-6 Certificate of Appropriateness – New Detached Garage and Changes to Street Facing Façade Dear Scott: I am sending you the Certificate of Appropriateness approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission for the demolition of an existing garage and construction of a new garage and changes to the street facing façade at 4633 Arden Avenue. Be advised that approval is subject to the conditions outlined in the certificate. Any changes to what was approved must be brought back to the Heritage Preservation Commission for review. I thank you for your cooperation with the Certificate of Appropriateness process. Once the construction is complete, please have your contractor arrange a final inspection with the Planning Department. I wish you the best of luck with your project, and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Emily Bodeker Assistant City Planner 952-826-0462 ebodeker@EdinaMN.Gov EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Pursuant to the requirements of Section 36-722 of the City Code of the City of Edina, no owner or contractor shall demolish any building in whole or in part; move a building or structure to another location; excavate archeological features, grade or move earth in areas believed to contain significant buried heritage resources, or commence new construction on any property designated as an Edina Heritage Landmark without a Certificate of Appropriateness. The Heritage Preservation Commission reviews applications for City permits in relation to designated heritage landmarks. Criteria and guidelines used in reviewing applications for Certificate of Appropriateness are contained in Section 36-722 (a - f) of the City Code. Issuance of this Certificate of Appropriateness is subject to the plans approved. Any change in the scope of work will require a new Certificate of Appropriateness. A final inspection by the City Planner is required when the work is completed. File #: H-21-5 Historic Property: 4633 Arden Avenue Property Owner: Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. Proposed Work: Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of an existing attached garage and construction of a new detached garage and changes to the street facing façade Decision: Approved Conditions: • Any changes to the proposed plans would require review from the Heritage Preservation Commission. • An as-built date plaque is required on the new detached garage. Date: April 13, 2021 meeting date Emily Bodeker Assistant City Planner Busyn Residence 4633 Arden Avenue Narrative for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for Changes to Street Facing Façade and New Detached Garage We are doing a rehabilitation and addition to the home at 4633 Arden Avenue and are proposing changes to the street facing façade and a new detached garage at 4633 Arden Avenue. Existing Home The existing home is an expansion 1 ½ story English Cottage style home built in 1938. We will be rehabilitating the home and doing an addition which will include living space over the sunroom on the right side of the home. The changes being proposed for the street facing façade are as follows: • Raising the roof of the sunroom to allow for living space above. This roof will match the pitch and not exceed the height of the existing roof. This roof is set back considerably from the main roof of the home so will not alter the main roof line. Adding a dormer to this space. • We will be pulling the front entry 3’ 4” forward, replacing the deteriorating existing flat roof covered entry with a new covered entry roof that blends into the roofline of the front living room. • Replacing a small dormer with a shed dormer with 5 windows to the left side of the principal roof structure • Changing the front door to a door with sidelights. • Separating the front left pair of windows. • Adding a new chimney cap. Existing Home Street Facing Façade Changes to Street Facing Façade Material List: • Maintain existing brick • Exterior trim all prime wood with matching crown molding of existing home: • New Marvin Windows. • Wood Front Door • Horizontal lap siding on dormers • Wood posts for covered entry wrapped in Boral (synthetic wood) trim for durability. Match wood post bracket detail of existing home: These changes to the street facing façade meet the Plan of Treatment because we are creating a compatible use for the property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. Here are other examples of similar curved entry roofs and shed dormers on 1 ½ story homes in the district: New Detached Garage The existing home has a difficult to access, undersized attached garage which we will be removing and replacing it with a new detached garage. We are proposing a new detached garage in the southeast corner of the property. This is the best position as it nestles in behind the detached garage at the home to the south, is the furthest away from the yard for the home to the north, and will be the least visible from the street. The garage will be positioned for the doors to face north. This will allow for the lowest portion of the structure (eve) to be facing the home on Maple Road to the East. The home on Maple Road also has a door they use to get into the Country Club District. This garage position will allow neighbors to continue to access the door: View from new garage to the south View from new garage to the east Views from new garage to the home to the north The only adjacent detached garage in the District is at the home to the south and it measures 19.35’ high. There is a detached garage on Maple Road behind 4633 Arden (not in the District) that measures 18’ high The new detached garage will be 18’ high measured from average existing grade. Site Plan for home and garage: Materials list for new garage: • Reuse/match existing brick. Match corner details from home • Horizontal lap siding • Marvin windows • Exterior trim all prime wood with matching crown molding of existing home. • Steel garage doors with PVC overlay paintable trim and divided light windows. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXOU OU OU OUOUOUOUOU XXXXXXXXOUOUOUOUOUOUS S S S S S X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXOU OU OU OUOUOUOUOU XXXXXXXXOUOUOUOUOUS S S S S S REVIEW Plan - NOT for building purposes 03/31/2021 3:01:51 PM Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 10, 2021 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission VIRTUAL MEETING Tuesday, April 13, 2021 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Lonnquist, Cundy, Birdman, Widmoyer, Nymo, Hassenstab, and Chair Schilling. Emily Bodeker, staff liaison, and preservation consultant, Robert Vogel were also in attendance. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Nymo seconded by Birdman to approve the meeting agenda as presented. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Lonnquist, seconded by Widmoyer to approve the March 9, 2021 meeting minutes after fixing the spelling error in annual elections. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Reports and Recommendations A. COA: 4600 Browndale Avenue Staff introduced the COA request for changes to a street facing façade at 4600 Browndale Avenue. The applicant’s representative, Ryan Fink, PKA, answered questions from the Commission. Motion made by Lonnquist seconded by Birdman to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness at 4600 Browndale Avenue subject to the following conditions: • Any changes to the proposed plans would require review from the Heritage Preservation Commission. All Voted ate. The motion carried. B. COA: 4518 Casco Avenue Staff introduced the COA request for the construction of a new detached garage at 4518 Casco Avenue. The applicant’s representative, Mike Eckardt, Archos, answered questions from the Commission. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 10, 2021 Motion made by Hassenstab seconded by Birdman to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness at 4518 Casco Avenue subject to the following conditions: • Any changes to the proposed plans would require review from the Heritage Preservation Commission. • A date-built plaque is required to be installed on the new garage All Voted ate. The motion carried. C. COA: 4633 Arden Avenue Staff introduced the COA request for the construction of a new detached garage and changes to the street facing façade at 4633 Arden Avenue. The applicant, Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, answered questions from the Commission. Motion made by Birdman seconded by Cundy to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness at 4633 Arden Avenue subject to the following conditions: • Any changes to the proposed plans would require review from the Heritage Preservation Commission. • An as-built date plaque is required on the new detached garage. All Voted ate. The motion carried. D. 2021 Edina Heritage Award Staff informed the Heritage Preservation Commission that there were two nominations received, 5504 Glengarry Parkway and 5900 Ollinger Boulevard. The Commission discussed both nominations. Motion made by Nymo seconded by Birdman to award the 2021 Edina Heritage Award to 5900 Ollinger Boulevard. All voted aye. The motion carried. VII. Chair and Member Comments A. 2021 Work Plan Updates Commissioners updated the group with updates on progress with 2021 work plan items. Commissioner Cundy informed the HPC on the discussion about 4630 Drexel Avenue at the City Council work session. The commission briefly discussed how to inform property owners that Landmark properties need to be maintained. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 10, 2021 B. Commissioner Birdman’s Last Meeting Commissioners and staff thanked Commissioner Birdman for his time and leadership while on the Heritage Preservation Commission. VI. Staff Comments: None VII. Adjournment Motion by Birdman seconded by Cundy to adjourn the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting at 8:06 p.m. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker Date: June 28, 2022 To: Emily Bodeker – City of Edina From: Scott Busyn Subject: 4633 Arden Avenue Amendment to COA: Material Selection and Adding Window Hi Emily, During the process of preparing the home for renovation, we realized that the existing brick was deteriorated and that there was an insufficient weather barrier to maintain a drainage plane behind the existing brick. The one layer of building paper was crumbling and brittle. The paper had insufficient coverage as it was not lapped properly in a waterfall fashion (reverse lapped in several areas). The paper was not nailed sufficiently and had nail holes. There was also no flashing over the windows. We are planning to install a code-complaint weather barrier and replace the brick with a similar tumbled brick look called Tundrabrick. We have photographic documentation of the original brick details on the home for the mason to match with the new product. We would also like to add a small window to the street facing façade to bring light into a kids playroom on the second floor: Approved COA Elevation: Existing Home Existing Weather Barrier Photos Proposed Material Tundrabrick with mortar Tundrabrick on similar home July 12, 2022 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Amendment to COA H-21-6, 4633 Arden Avenue-building materials and the addition of a window Information / Background: The subject property, 4633 Arden Avenue is located on the east side of Arden Avenue, just north of the intersection of Arden Avenue and Country Club Road. The existing home on the subject property was built in 1938 and is identified as an example of English Cottage style but classified as an American Colonial Cottage in the Country Club National Register nomination documents. A certificate of appropriateness was approved on April 13, 2021 for the construction of a detached garage and a second floor addition that is visible from the street facing façade, changes to an existing dormer and changes to the entryway. The original COA noted that the existing brick was to remain on the front of the house and reused for the garage. The property owner removed the brick without notifying the city. Staff notified the contractor that the building material would need to come back to the HPC for approval. The building official placed a stop work order on the site on May 17, 2022. The contractor had permission with the stop work order to install house wrap to protect sheathing. They were also notified all windows need to be kept closed or weathertight. The request includes the approval of building materials and the addition of a second-floor window as shown on the updated proposed elevations. Primary Issues: The request is for the HPC to approve the replacement brick material and approve the placement of a new second story window. The applicant removed the brick from the house without notifying or getting approvals from city staff. The commission is asked to review the proposed material. STAFF REPORT Page 2 The objective of the Country Club Landmark District is preservation of the existing historic house facades and streetscapes. The city has adopted the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation when reviewing certificate of appropriateness applications. Staff believes the following standards of rehabilitation are pertinent to the review of the certificate of appropriateness: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. • Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. • Distinctive features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. • New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historical materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Preservation Consultant Vogel reviewed the application and has written a memo that is attached in the heritage preservation commission packet. Staff Recommendation & Findings: A case could be made for approval or denial of the proposed replacement brick material. Below provides options for the heritage preservation commission to consider: Approval (brick and window) Approve the amendment to COA H-21-6 allowing the use of Tundrabrick and approval of the addition of a second-floor window. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed brick material meets the intent of the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation and the Country Club Plan of Treatment. 2. Tundrabrick is appropriate for rehabilitation projects in the country club district. 3. The Tundrabrick material would match the original brick material in size, composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. 4. The visual impact of the proposed window is minimal and compatible with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and the Country Club Plan of Treatment. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Denial for Brick (approval for window) Deny the proposed replacement brick material and approve the addition of a second-floor window: 1. The existing brick was a distinguishing feature of the home. Tundabrick does not match the features of the original brick in size, composition, design, color, texture or other visual qualities. 2. The visual impact of the proposed window is minimal and compatible with the house’s original design. 3. The addition of the window meets the intent of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and the Country Club Plan of Treatment. MEMORANDUM TO: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner FROM: Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant DATE: June 30, 2022 SUBJECT: COA amendment for 4633 Arden Avenue I have reviewed the request to amend the COA issued in 2021 construction of a new detached garage and exterior alterations at 4633 Arden Avenue in the Country Club District. The masonry conservation issues described by the applicant are commonly found in mid-century modern houses. The Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation (which are the required basis for all COA decisions) recommend repair rather than replacement of deteriorated brick “whenever possible”; the guidelines for applying the standards also recommend compliance with current building safety codes in such a manner that the essential character of a building is preserved intact. If the city’s building official determines that the deteriorated brick wall cladding at 4633 Arden cannot be repaired, replacement would be appropriate and the COA should be amended, with the following condition: that the new brick and mortar must match the old masonry in size (face height & length), composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. It is unlikely that the original face brick is still being manufactured. (The applicant should provide the HPC with samples of the existing brick as well as the Tundrabrick product referenced in Mr. Busyn’s letter in order to demonstrate the match.) With respect to the proposed addition of a small window in the front-facing gable wall, the visual impact of the change should be minimal and in my opinion compatible with the house’s original design. No historically important architectural details will be destroyed or obscured. Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date:8/11/22 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Tuesday, July 12, 2022 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Schilling, Commissioners, Cundy, Everson, Pollock (7:05), Nymo, Lonnquist, Knudsen, and Kmetz-Sheehy (7:10). Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker, Building Official David Fisher, City Manager Scott Neal III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Pollock to approve the meeting agenda as presented, moving the City Council Work Session Follow up to the first item under Reports/Recommendations. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Lonnquist, seconded by Knudsen to approve the May 10, 2022, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: Dan Dulas, 4609 Brue Avenue expressed concerns on the timeline of construction and projects sitting dormant. He also expressed concern for the loss of historic resources after façade alterations by a certain contractor. VI. Reports/Recommendations Motion by Cundy, seconded by Nymo to table the City Manager’s presentation to after the COA items on the agenda. Commissioners Cundy, Everson, Pollock, Nymo, Lonnquist and Knudsen voted aye. Commissioner Kmetz-Sheehy voted nay. The motion passed. Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date:8/11/22 B. COA H-22-7, 4707 Sunnyside Road-Change of Garage Doors Liaison Bodeker introduced the COA request to for changes to a street facing façade garage door. Motion made by Lonnquist seconded by Nymo to approve the COA as requested with the condition that all roofs, exterior walls, doors, and windows are required to be kept weather tight through the construction process to protect the integrity of the structure. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. COA H-22-6 4914 Bruce Ave-New Detached Garage. Liaison Bodeker introduced the proposed COA for a new garage at 4914 Bruce Avenue. Staff also noted that the new garage requires a front yard setback variance, which will be heard by the Planning Commission. Motion by Cundy seconded by Lonnquist to approve the new garage as presented with the conditions of 10 foot or smaller garage door widths, an architectural detail added to the north wall and a date plaque installed on the exterior of the new garage. All voted yes. The motion passed. D. COA H-22-5 4505 Drexel Ave-New Detached Garage and Front Door Overhang Liaison Bodeker introduced the proposed COA for a new detached garage and front door overhang. Motion made by Cundy seconded by Nymo to split the discussion items and discuss the garage and overhang separately. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion made by Cundy seconded by Lonnquist to table the front door overhang portion of the COA application to the August HPC meeting. All voted yes. The motion carried. Motion made by Lonnquist seconded by Cundy to approve the COA for the detached garage with the condition that an as built date plaque be installed on the exterior of the new garage. All voted aye. The motion carried. E. Update to COA H-21-6 4633 Arden Avenue-Update to Building Materials Liaison Bodeker introduced the update to COA H-21-6 which included the building materials and an additional window on the second floor of the street facing façade. Motion made by Cundy seconded by Knudsen to deny the proposed changes including the materials presented and including the second-floor window. The motion was withdrawn because the applicant was agreeable to be tabled to the August HPC meeting. The commission was clear all proposed changes to the original COA should be included in. Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date:8/11/22 Motion made by Cundy seconded by Pollock to table the Update to COA H-21-6 to the August HPC meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. A. City Council Work Session Follow Up City Manager Neal presented to the Commission. The HPC and staff discussed steps moving forward. The Commission decided to create a sub-committee of the HPC to get together to answer some of the questions outlined in the staff memo from Assistant Manager Schaeffer. Community Engagement Manager Lamon offered to help the group with steps moving forward and bringing Commission Correspondence to the City Council. F. 2023 Work Plan Brainstorm Staff Liaison Bodeker asked the Commission to send her work plan items to bring to the HPC meeting in August. VII. Chair and Member Comments: Chair Schilling mentioned the Cake Walk Tour from Hennepin County History Museum was happening this weekend. Commissioner Everson mentioned to the HPC that he is working on an old Victorian house in White Bear Lake-the oldest house he has worked on. IX. Staff Comments: None X. Adjournment Motion made by Nymo seconded by Lonnquist to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 pm. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker Date: July 27, 2022 To: Emily Bodeker – City of Edina From: Scott Busyn Subject: 4633 Arden Avenue Amendment to COA: Material Selection, Adding Window, and Adjusting Size of Shed Dormer Hi Emily, During the process of preparing the home for renovation, we realized that the existing brick was deteriorated and that there was an insufficient weather barrier to maintain a drainage plane behind the existing brick. The one layer of building paper was crumbling and brittle. The paper had insufficient coverage as it was not lapped properly in a waterfall fashion (reverse lapped in several areas). The paper was not nailed sufficiently and had nail holes. There was also no flashing over the windows. We are planning to install a code-complaint weather barrier and replace the brick with a similar tumbled brick. We are proposing to use either: 1) Tundrabrick, 2) Modular Winter Mist, 3) Welshire Tumbled Brick with a painted finish. We have photographic documentation of the original brick details on the home for the mason to match with the new product. We would also like to add a small window to the street facing façade to bring light into a kids playroom on the second floor and expand the shed dormer. The original size of the dormer on the drawing submitted for COA was 13.5’ x 5’. After doing the structural engineering and insulation requirements for permit,the dormer expanded slightly to 15’ x 5’. Approved COA Elevation: Existing Home Existing Weather Barrier Photos Proposed Material 1) Tundra Brick (Brick Veneer) Tundrabrick with mortar Tundrabrick on similar home 2) Modular Winter Mist (Full Brick) 3) 4) Welshire Tumbled Brick with Painted Finish 1 Emily Bodeker From:Scott Busyn <scott@greatneighborhoodhomes.com> Sent:Thursday, July 28, 2022 3:26 PM To:Emily Bodeker Cc:Cary Teague; David Fisher Subject:Re: 4633 Arden COA EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Emily, The windows on the COA sketch were approximately 24 x 48. The windows on the updated dormer I sent are approximately 24”w x 36” to 42"h. We want to maintain the 4/12 dormer pitch we submitted for the COA. Due to structural header requirements and keeping the bottoms of the window trim above the flashing on the roof below the dormer, these windows will be approximately 24”w x 36-42h.” We will measure for the final window size once we complete framing and understand existing conditions in the existing roof/dormer framing. Thanks, SCOTT BUSYN President 3939 West 50th Street, Suite 103A, Edina, MN 55424 Direct: 952.807.8765 | Fax: 952.926.1168 scott@greatneighborhoodhomes.com | greatneighborhoodhomes.com On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:44 AM, Emily Bodeker <EBodeker@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Scott, Did the windows on the dormer change size from what was originally submitted with the COA? Please clarify. Please also plan to bring examples of the brick to the HPC meeting on Thursday, August 11th at 6:00. Thank you, <image001.gif> Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner 952-826-0462 | Fax 952-826-0389 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 EBodeker@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov 1 Emily Bodeker From:Scott Busyn <scott@greatneighborhoodhomes.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 10, 2022 1:56 PM To:Emily Bodeker Cc:David Fisher; Cary Teague; Grace Hancock; Margaret Busyn Subject:Supplemental Information for COA Amendment 4633 Arden Avenue: Brick Material Attachments:PastedGraphic-1.tiff Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and know the content is safe.    Hi Emily,    I will not be available to come to this Thursday’s HPC meeting, but Margaret Busyn will attend to answer questions and  offer her testimony. Regarding the brick material we are proposing for the home, I want to add the following  information if you can please share it with the HPC members prior to the meeting.    Per our masonry supplier, using the same brick is not feasible under today’s building code. The only thing available is a  reclaimed Chicago brick that does not comply with todays standard for new construction (grade SW) as it has a higher  absorption rate than brick that are manufactured today.     We are proposing three options for the brick exterior: 1) Tundrabrick, 2) Modular Winter Mist, 3) Welshire Tumbled  Brick with a painted finish. Our preferred choice is the Tundrabrick for the following reasons:    1) The tundra brick material duplicates the original brick as close as possible among the three options. The Secretary of  Interior Standards for Rehabilitation states that If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible, then a compatible substitute material may be considered. The Plan of Treatment states "Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. “ The tundra brick, when installed, will have the same face height, width, depth and texture as the old brick. It also has the same design with a tumbled and rough face look of the existing brick. Here is a photo of the tundrabrick on top of the existing brick (existing brick has been painted).  2     2. The tundra brick will allow us to achieve our goal of this home participating in Edina’s Climate Action Plan. Under  Section 3 Building and Energy, Section BE2, the Climate Action Plan is to “Increase adoption of high performance  building construction technology, achieving 5% net zero homes community wide by 2023. Per Edina’s Net Zero Guide p.  60‐5 E5 Insulate for High Performance Efficiency: Appropriate insulation levels are one of the key considerations for  achieving a high energy performance and cost effective Net Zero Energy home. An important concept in high performing  building insulation is “continuous insulation (c.i.)” Continuous insulation focuses on the elimination of thermal bridging  (heat transfer through framing materials). Per the Edina Net Zero  Home Guide, the minimum exterior continuous  insulation R factor for a wood framed wall is 12.5 per this table:  3     Our plan for the tundrabrick is to put 2 1/2 of rigid foam insulation on the exterior of the framing sheathing. This will  achieve Edina’s minimum Net Zero goals for continuous insulation. This will also give the same brick depth as the original  brick as it was installed in the house. The depth will allow for the same design as the original brick (height, width, depth,  texture). It will also allow for the same brick design dept for the depth of inset windows, doors, corners, and original fine  details (brick corbels). Here is a photo of the tundra brick with 2.5” of insulation over the original home brick:  4       Regarding the compatibility of painted white brick homes in the neighborhood, there was some concern at the last HPC  meeting that there weren’t other painted white brick homes in the neighborhood. Here are some photos of other  painted brick homes in the neighborhood:  5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12     I would also point out that the HPC approved painting the stone at 4510 Sunnyside (which is not found in the  neighborhood).    We feel the tundra brick is the appropriate choice for the replacement of the existing brick. It is compatible with the Plan  of Treatment in design, texture and color and blends in with the character of the district. The tundra brick will also allow  us to participate in Edina’s Climate Action Plan.    Thanks for taking the time to review this information.    SCOTT BUSYN President 3939 West 50th Street, Suite 103A, Edina, MN 55424 13 Direct: 952.807.8765 | Fax: 952.926.1168 scott@greatneighborhoodhomes.com | greatneighborhoodhomes.com     August 11, 2022 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Amendment to COA H-21-6, 4633 Arden Avenue-building materials, addition of a second-floor window and changes to street facing dormer Information / Background: The subject property, 4633 Arden Avenue is located on the east side of Arden Avenue, just north of the intersection of Arden Avenue and Country Club Road. The existing home on the subject property was built in 1938 and is identified as an example of English Cottage style but classified as an American Colonial Cottage in the Country Club National Register nomination documents. A certificate of appropriateness was approved on April 13, 2021, for the construction of a detached garage and a second-floor addition that is visible from the street facing façade, changes to an existing dormer and changes to the entryway. The original COA noted that the existing brick was to remain on the front of the house and reused for the garage. The property owner removed the brick without notifying the city. Staff notified the contractor that the building material would need to come back to the HPC for approval. The building official placed a stop work order on the site on May 17, 2022. The contractor had permission with the stop work order to install house wrap to protect sheathing. They were also notified all windows need to be kept closed or weathertight. The request includes the approval of building materials, the addition of a second-floor window and changes to the size of a street facing dormer, including window size, as shown on the updated proposed elevations. Primary Issues: The request is for the HPC to approve the replacement brick material, approve the placement of a new second story window, and approve the changes to a street facing dormer (including window sizes). The applicant removed the brick from the house without notifying or getting approvals from STAFF REPORT Page 2 city staff. The commission is asked to review the proposed materials. The objective of the Country Club Landmark District is preservation of the existing historic house facades and streetscapes. The city has adopted the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation when reviewing certificate of appropriateness applications. Staff believes the following standards of rehabilitation are pertinent to the review of the certificate of appropriateness: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. • Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. • Distinctive features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. • New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historical materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Preservation Consultant Vogel reviewed the updated application and has written a memo that is attached in the heritage preservation commission packet. Staff Recommendation & Findings: A case could be made for approval or denial of the proposed replacement brick material. Below provides options for the heritage preservation commission to consider: Approval (brick, window and dormer) Approve the amendment to COA H-21-6 approving the updated building material (Tundrabrick, Modular Winter Mist, or Welshire Tumbled Brick with a painted finish) approval of the addition of a second-floor window and approval of the change in size of the dormer, including the size of the windows. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed brick material meets the intent of the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation and the Country Club Plan of Treatment. 2. The replacement brick is appropriate for rehabilitation projects in the country club district. 3. The replacement material would match the original brick material in size, composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. 4. The visual impact of the additional window and changes to the dormer is minimal and STAFF REPORT Page 3 compatible with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and the Country Club Plan of Treatment. Denial for Brick (approval for window and changes to the dormer) Deny the proposed replacement brick material, approve the addition of a second-floor window, and approve changes to the street facing façade: 1. The existing brick was a distinguishing feature of the home. Tundabrick does not match the features of the original brick in size, composition, design, color, texture, or other visual qualities. 2. The visual impact of the proposed window is minimal and compatible with the house’s original design. 3. The addition of the window and changes to the dormer meet the intent of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and the Country Club Plan of Treatment. MEMORANDUM TO: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner FROM: Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant DATE: August 1, 2022 SUBJECT: Comments on COA Amendment for House at 4633 Arden Avenue I have reviewed the materials submitted with the request to amend the COA previously issued for renovation of the existing house located at 4633 Arden Avenue in the Country Club District. The applicant proposes to add a window and enlarge the size of the shed-roof dormer shown in the original remodeling plan; both features are located on the subject property’s primary (street facing) elevation. In my professional opinion, the proposed façade alterations are minimal and compatible with the house’s original design. Attic windows and shed-roofed dormers are characteristic of homes inspired by the American Arts and Crafts Movement, which lasted from the 1880s until the 1920s. This type of dormer is actually quite common in the Country Club neighborhood, where it occurs as a minor decorative feature on both “period revival” (Colonial, Tudor and Mediterranean) and “mid-century modern” (Minimal Traditional, Neocolonial, and Ranch) style homes. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation allow for façade alterations on heritage resources so long as the new work preserves the features which are significant to the property’s historical, architectural and cultural values. Because no historic character defining architectural features will be destroyed or obscured by the new construction, the new window and enlarged dormer should be considered appropriate. Regarding replacement of the historic brick wall cladding, the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation state that deteriorated architectural features should be repaired, rather than replaced, “whenever possible”; however, if replacement is necessary, “the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities.” The best practice for replacing old brick is to use new brick that duplicates the old as closely as possible—this assumes that the actual historic brick used in the original construction is no longer available. It is unlikely that the face brick used in 1938 is still being manufactured. As I noted previously, the best approach for design review would be for the applicant to provide the HPC with one or two of the old bricks along with samples of the proposed replacement brick so that the commissioners could make a side-by-side comparison. (It is hard for most people to judge the visual qualities of different construction materials based on photographs.) Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 9/13/22 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Thursday, August 11, 2022 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Schilling, Commissioners Everson, Hassenstab, Pollock, Lonnquist, Cundy (arrived at 6:50 p.m.), and student member Maheshwari. Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker, Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel, Building Official David Fisher, and Community Engagement Manager MJ Lamon (virtual) III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Commissioner Hassenstab, seconded by Commissioner Everson, to approve the meeting agenda, moving the Century Homes work plan update to after VIA. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Commissioner Pollock, seconded by Commissioner Lonnquist, to approve the July 12, 2022, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. COA H-22-5 4505 Drexel Ave- Front Door Overhang (continued from July 12) Staff Liaison Bodeker refreshed members on the Front Door Overhang that was shown to the Commission in July. The Commission discussed the approval of the continued certificate of appropriateness request from the applicant. Motion made by Commissioner Lonnquist, seconded by Commissioner Hassenstab, to approve the COA as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 9/13/22 B. Century Homes Work Plan Update Commissioners Lonnquist and Hassenstab and Student Commissioner Maheshwari discussed the opportunity statement and updated the group on the Century Homes workplan. Commissioners asked questions relating to what the application fee covers and grant money. The commission was encouraged to look at the HouseNovel website before the next meeting. C. Update to COA H-21-6 4633 Arden Avenue- Update to building materials, addition of new second floor window, and changes to the front dormer (continued from July 12) Staff Liaison Bodeker gave an overview of property and discussed the proposed application. The applicant was in attendance and showed the Commissioners and Staff the options for the building materials: Option #1- Tundra Brick Option #2- Modular Winter Mist Option #3- Welshire Tumbled Brick with painted finish The Commission discussed the property and asked questions of the applicant relating to brick corbels, insulation options, material and size of dormers, and alterations to the approved COA. Motion made by Commissioner Lonnquist to approve the amended plans as submitted with confirmation that the bay window is built rounded as it is today, approving options 2 & 3 of the full brick building materials. The motion received no second. The motion failed. Motion made by Commissioner Hassenstab to deny the amended COA and enforce the original COA as approved with Chicago Brick, denying all three building material options. The motion received no second. The motion failed. Motion made by Commissioner Pollock, seconded by Commissioner Hassenstab, to deny the proposed COA changes and approving option 2, Modular winter mist full brick as the approved building material. Commissioners Everson, Lonnquist, Pollock, Hassenstab, and Schilling voted aye. Commissioner Cundy voted nay. The motion carried. D. Advisory Communication: Subcommittee Recommendations Commissioner Lonnquist outlined the goals and recommendations from the subcommittee staff. Commissioner Lonnquist proposed that the subcommittee put together a working draft to be presented at the September meeting. Motion made by Commissioner Cundy, seconded by Commissioner Everson, to approve the advisory communication. All voted aye. The motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 9/13/22 E. 2023 Work Plan Brainstorm The Commission discussed the 2023 Work Plan proposal. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel recommended to utilize the City’s existing list of contributing vs. noncontributing properties for public education purposes. VII. Chair and Member Comments: Commissioner Hassenstab recognized Student Commissioner Maheshwari for the great work he has done. Commissioner Cundy requested there be more discrepancy on a threshold for changes relating to approved COA’s. VIII. Staff Comments: None IX. Adjournment Motion made by Commissioner Pollock, seconded by Commissioner Hassenstab, to adjourn the meeting at 9:09 p.m. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker Project Report 30 January 2019 - 28 September 2022 Better Together Edina Certificate of Appropriateness Applications 4633 Arden Ave - Building Material Change, Addition of Window, Change to Dormer June 2022 - September 28, 2022 Visitors 42 Contributors 7 CONTRIBUTIONS 14 05 July 22 Badger49 AGREES 2 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 1 05 July 22 Badger49 AGREES 2 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 26 September 22 Aegaskill AGREES 1 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 26 September 22 tom beckey AGREES 1 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 September 2022 FORUM TOPIC 4633 Arden Ave-Building Material Change, Addition of a Window,Change to Dormer Window above bay window seems to maintain the historical nature of the home and cur b look as well. Brick choice does not seem consistent with the historical nature of the home or area. Very few, if any, homes have this color of brick. Strikes me as more mo dern than the original and somewhat out of place for the area. Can only think of one white brick home of the top of my head and it is a painted red brick. I am sure there are better matches to the original brick coloring that would better maint ain the historical nature and curb appeal as well as overall neighborhood consistency t han the chosen materials. This project has been a mess for over 2 years. The new owner removed the brick and left the house to the elements. Even the downspouts have been removed allowing wate r damage to the property. In a neighborhood with rules as to the appearance to our ho mes and property, this project has been an eyesore. Action to hold the new owner accountable is way overdue. The design seems consistent with the neighborhood but not the exterior brick. The whit e brick is NOT consistent since most of the homes in country club are red/brown which was the brick color of choice when the neighborhood was created. I feel it would make t he house "stand out" as an odd duck and start a undesirable precedent. Page 25 of 40 27 September 22 rwcmn2020 AGREES 0 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 27 September 22 LarryS AGREES 1 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 September 2022 FORUM TOPIC 4633 Arden Ave-Building Material Change, Addition of a Window,Change to Dormer Edina City Code Section 36-722 states: "Permit review decisions shall be based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties" Note that in City code "shall" is defined as mandatory. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties - as adopted and cited in the Country Club Distri ct Plan of Treatment (adopted by Edina City Council in April 2008) states that: "Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deteri oration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old i n design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials." The builder/owner of this property illegally removed the brick on this home in violation of their approved COA from Ap ril 2021 and only afterwards claimed that it was deteriorated as a reasoning for doing so. Setting that aside, their proposed replacement still must meet the requirements of th e Plan of Treatment and the Secretary of the Interior Standards (again, remember that Code states "shall"). The proposed replacement material does not match the original brick in design, color texture OR material - let alone all four - because it is a cement ven eer product that imitates brick but is not actually brick. The proposed replacement material does not, therefore, meet the requirements as defined and was properly rejected b y the HPC. It should be noted that the applicant had originally applied to apply appropri ately matching brick to the new garage and addition on the home (in their April 2021 COA application) and stated again at the July HPC meeting that they COULD apply real brick but preferred not to. But the bar for building in the Country Club District is NOT preservation by preference. It is preservation BY LAW. To further that point, here are two quotes from the City of Edina's historic preservation consultant and a third from the Cit y Attorney:"It's not the National Register of Pretty Places. It's Historic Places. So there has to be historic stuff."- Robert Vogel, City Consultant, June 2022 HPC Meeting "The best practice for replacing old brick is to use new brick that duplicates the old as closelyas possible."- Robert Vogel, City Consultant, July 2022 HPC Memo regarding 4633 Ar den Avenue“With respect to approval of […] materials, the HPC may not make a decisi on which is arbitrary and capricious. The HPC must apply the standards in the Plan of Treatment.”- David Kendall, Attorney for the City of Edina, May 2022 Memo to the HPC There is no legal basis for the HPC to have made any other choice but to deny the application, as clearly stated by the City's own historic and legal experts. Further, given that the HPC's decisions are deemed quasi-judicial by the State of Minnesota - as highlight ed by the City in defense of a recent lawsuit on this topic - the Council must also address this matter in judicial manner. That is, while any member of Council may not agree with the laws/rules as they stand today, they are nonetheless bound to those laws and rules in making their decision. In short, Council is legally REQUIRED to uphold the Aug ust 2022 HPC decision. I am not affected by the look from the street since my property backs up to the subject property from Maple Road, but I agree with most of the comments. The design looks v ery nice, but the white material would change the look significantly. There are plenty ofwhite siding houses in the area but not many white brick. if this house has some histori c significance it should probably be a brick that more closely matches the original. Most importantly, the city must get this resolved so that the property can be completed. It h as been an eyesore in its uncompleted state. Page 26 of 40 28 September 22 Heritage123 AGREES 0 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 September 2022 FORUM TOPIC 4633 Arden Ave-Building Material Change, Addition of a Window,Change to Dormer There is no doubt the scale of the original COA dormer is much more appropriate. The detailing on the revised drawing of the larger dormer looks very suburban and is not attractive or appropriate for the neighborhood. The windows look short and aren't as refin ed as those you see in country club. In addition, the dormer extending to the left and ri ght from the bank of windows is also not historic or authentic to the neighborhood.The brick they are proposing to use will lack depth and character and does not belong in Co untry Club. To be honestly, I'm shocked a builder of that caliber would even propose a brick veneer. Many of us have intentionally used higher end materials than we may ha ve wanted to use because it's the right decision for the neighborhood in order to mainta in the character and historic nature of these homes, which is why we choose to live here.I do think there is a history with this builder to make decisions that he knows he shoul dn't make under the guise of deterioration and hopes that nobody will notice. I think this house will be lovely when/if it is done appropriately and within the channels we've all gone through when renovating these beautiful, historic homes! Page 27 of 40 September 13, 2022 Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 SENT VIA EMAIL ONLY (CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov) Re: Appeal of Denial of Certificate of Appropriateness Great Neighborhood Homes Dear Mayor and City Council Members: This office represents Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. (“Applicant” or “Appellant”) relative to the appeal of a decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission (the “Commission”). More specifically, this appeal concerns the denial of a request for the Commission to approve an amended Certificate of Appropriateness (“COA”) which would permit certain remodeling and improvements for the real property situated at 4633 Arden Ave. Edina (the “Property”).1 The amended COA requested by the Applicant sought the Commission’s approval of three elements: (1) approval of replacement of failed and failing brick cladding (aesthetic brick) with Tundrabrick; (2) installation of a small window on the house’s second floor; and (3) expansion of an existing dormer (collectively, the “Project”). The Commission denied the amended COA at its hearing on August 11, 2022. Applicant then timely appealed that decision on August 18, 2022. This matter is scheduled to come before the City Council on October 6, 2022. The appeal herein should be granted because the landowner has inappropriately been prevented from improving its property based upon an erroneous understanding of the Commission’s jurisdiction. City ordinance does not grant the Commission authority to require a COA for mere remodeling. To the contrary, the City Code circumscribes the jurisdiction of the Commission to “demolition”, a defined term, and new home or building construction. Furthermore, the text and history of the Country Club District Plan of Treatment (the “Plan of Treatment”) reflect that the Commission’s authority does not extend to property renovations. The City building department erroneously issued a stop work order directing the landowner to obtain an amended COA when neither the Code nor the Plan of Treatment require one. None of the three elements requested in the amended COA are, in fact, subject to the jurisdiction and approval authority of the 1 The Commission had previously approved a COA for the Property permitting erection of a detached garage and a second floor addition, changes to an existing dormer and changes to the front entry of the home. Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council September 13, 2022 Page 2 Commission. The City Council should grant the appeal, reverse the decision of the Commission, find and declare that the Project does not require a COA, and direct the building department to rescind the stop work order. 1. Applicant Applied for the Amended COA After the Building Inspector Posted a Stop Work Order Claiming that Commission Approval was Required Before Replacing Brick Cladding. Applicant sought the amended COA in response to the posting of a stop work order (the “Order) on the Property on May 17, 2022 by David Fisher, Building Official. The Order reads: This property has a violation of the COA from Planning and HPC. Brick was removed from the exterior of the home and left. . . . This will need to have planning approval before the stop work can be removed. Thus, the Order was predicated on the conclusion of the Building Official that before exterior cladding could be removed and replaced, Applicant needed authorization from the Commission in the form of a COA. The Building Official repeated this claim when by e-mail dated August 17, 2022, he told Applicant that the Order would remain in place until Applicant revised plans to incorporate a specific type of brick other than Applicant’s preferred brick type. 2. Under State Law, the Jurisdiction of the Commission is Limited to Authority Granted by City Ordinance. Minnesota Statute § 471.193 allows municipalities to create heritage preservation commissions. With respect to the powers of such commissions, the statute reads: “The powers and duties of any commission established pursuant to this section may include any power possessed by the political subdivision creating the commission, but shall be those delegated or assigned by the ordinance establishing the commission.” Minn. Stat. § 417.193, Subd. 4 (emphasis added). “[N]o action of a commission shall contravene any provision of a municipal zoning or planning ordinance unless expressly authorized by ordinance.” Id. 3. The Edina City Code Defines and Limits the Jurisdiction of the Commission. City Code Section 36-722(a) states: To protect significant heritage resources, the heritage preservation board shall review all applications for city permits for the following types of work in relation to a designated heritage landmark: (1) Demolition of any building or structure, in whole or in part; (2) Moving a building or structure to another location; Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council September 13, 2022 Page 3 (3) Excavation of archeological features, grading or earth moving in areas believed to contain significant buried heritage resources; and (4) New construction. Under the City Code, only in these four specific circumstances must a COA be obtained from the Commission. See City Code § 36-722(b) (“No city permits for the work described in subsection (a) of this section will be issued without a certificate of appropriateness signed by the city planner and approved by the heritage preservation board[.]”) 4. The Plan of Treatment Further Narrows the Jurisdiction of the Commission. The Plan of Treatment was adopted by the City in 2003, and amended by resolution in 2008. Contemporaneous meeting minutes of the Heritage Preservation Board (the “Board”) from 2008 are emphatic that the purpose of the Plan was to stop the practice of house tear downs and to prevent the construction of architecturally inappropriate new homes. Meeting minutes from a meeting of the board dated November 13, 2007, contain comments from the City’s preservation consultant, Robert Vogel. Vogel specifically addressed the following question: “Should Certificates of Appropriateness be required for structural alterations and additions?” 11/13/2007 HPB Minutes p. 4. Vogel’s response to that question is copied here: Regarding the issue of reviewing additions and alteration projects, the current City of Edina heritage preservation code does not require Certificates of Appropriateness for exterior alterations or additions on any buildings within a designated heritage landmark district. The primary emphasis on the code is on preventing teardowns of historic (i.e., contributing) properties and applying architectural design standards to new construction. The protection, repair, and replacement of exterior features on historic homes is left to the homeowners. Vogel pointed out that the cornerstone of the city’s preservation program, as it is currently constituted, is the concept of heritage preservation as a partnership between local government and property owners. Sustaining the city’s heritage resources for future generations depends on striking a balance between government regulation and private stewardship. . . . When the current preservation code was adopted, there was a strong consensus among members of the City Council, the Heritage Preservation Board, and the public that the best way to make the benefits of preservation available to the largest number of historic property owners and the community as a whole was to emphasize voluntary compliance with preservation standards (private stewardship) over regulation by means of Certificates of appropriateness (police power). Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council September 13, 2022 Page 4 Mr. Vogel further stated that the most important threat to the historic integrity of the Country club District is from teardowns— specifically, the demolition of existing historic homes and the construction of architecturally inappropriate new homes. 11/13/2007 HPB Minutes pp. 5-6. During the course of the same meeting, Vogel explained that: Because no form of government regulation of private property is perfect (there will always be ‘loopholes’ and property owners willing to circumvent the official controls), requiring Certificates of Appropriateness for exterior remodeling and small additions would not increase the long-term benefits of heritage landmark zoning for the community at large. In my opinion, it would be better to address the problems posed by inappropriate façade remodeling and out-of-scale additions through more intensive public education[.] Vogel summed up that the “heritage landmark code and the political process that shaped it have placed limits on the authority of the Heritage Preservation Board to prescribe any particular preservation treatment outside of demolition and new construction in relation to privately owned property.” The adopted revised Plan of Treatment is consistent with the limited scope as described by Vogel. It requires a landowner to obtain a COA for “demolition, moving buildings, and new construction within the district.” The full Plan of Treatment definition of “demolition” reads: Demolition – For purposes of design review and compliance with City Code §850.20 subd. 10, demolition shall mean the physical alteration of a building that requires a city permit and where: (a) 50% or more of the surface area of all exterior walls, in the aggregate, are removed; or (b) 50% or more of the principal roof structure is removed, changing its shape, pitch or height; or (c) A front porch, side porch, vestibule, dormer, chimney, attached garage, or porte-cochere is removed or destroyed. This definition does not include removal of existing siding, trim, fascia, soffit, eave moldings, windows, and doors. (Emphasis added.) With respect to new construction, the Plan of Treatment pertains to new home construction and new garages. The plan of treatment contains a section under the header “voluntary compliance.” This section reads:  “The City will promote voluntary compliance with historic preservation standards for the rehabilitation of individual historic properties by encouraging repairs, additions, or alterations which make possible an efficient contemporary use of older homes in the district while preserving those features that are historically and architecturally significant. Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council September 13, 2022 Page 5  Although not ordinarily subject to Certificates of Appropriateness, small additions or minor alterations should be done in such a manner that they do not destroy historically significant architectural features. New additions should be differentiated from historic architecture and designed to be compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property.” 5. Judicial Standards of Interpretation Applicable to City Ordinances. The interpretation of a city code is an issue of law which a court will review without deference to the municipality. Frank’s Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d 604, 608 (Minn. 1980). Zoning ordinances are construed: (1) according to their plain and ordinary meaning; (2) strictly against a city and in favor of a landowner; and (3) in light of their underlying policy goals. Id. A court will hold a city “strictly” to its own standards. Id. A court must give weight to the interpretation of the ordinance that, “while still within the confines of the [ordinance], is least restrictive upon the rights of the property owner to use [its] land as [it] wishes.” Id. at 608- 609. Courts have frequently relied upon these principles of interpretation to reverse governmental refusals to issue permits. See, e.g., Frank’s Nursery Sales, 295 N.W.2d at 608-609 (rejecting City of Roseville’s conclusion proposed store selling lawn, garden, plant, and some craft items was not a “lawn and garden” center under city ordinance and affirming district court’s order directing issuance of building permit); Gergen v. City of Mantorville, No. A05-1717, 2006 WL 1806383, at *3 (Minn. Ct. App. July 3, 2006) (concluding that the City of Mantorville erred when it interpreted “usual farm building” phrase in ordinance and affirming district court’s order directing city to issue a building permit). 6. Appellant Had No Legal Obligation to Seek a COA for the Project; the Order is Legally Unsupported and Should be Rescinded. Nothing in the text or history of the City Code or the Plan of Treatment authorized the Planning Department to compel Appellant to obtain a COA to carry out the Project. The Commission cannot claim authority not conferred by the City. Minn. Stat. § 417.193, Subd. 4. Accordingly, the starting point in the analysis is the City’s jurisdictional grant of authority under City Code Section 36-722(a). The only arguably applicable component is “demolition.” That term is expressly defined by the Plan. No element of the Project constitutes “demolition.” To the contrary, by proposing to remove and replace cladding—which is just one form of house siding—Appellant is proposing to perform an activity expressly excluded from the definition of demolition. Plan of Treatment (Definition of “demolition”) (“This definition does not include removal of existing siding, trim, fascia, soffit, eave moldings, windows, and doors.”). The clear and unambiguous language of the City Code and the Plan of Treatment compel the conclusion the Commission lacks jurisdiction over the Project. Even if the Code and the Plan of Treatment were ambiguous—which they are not—the history behind the 2008 amendment to the Plan of Treatment resolves any doubt about the intentions the City had regarding the Commission’s jurisdiction. The City’s preservation specialist was emphatic that under the City’s regulatory scheme, “[t]he protection, repair, and replacement of exterior features on historic homes is left to the homeowners.” 11/13/2007 HPB Minutes pp. 5. Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council September 13, 2022 Page 6 The City had made the determination that “requiring Certificates of Appropriateness for exterior remodeling and small additions would not increase the long-term benefits of heritage landmark zoning for the community at large.” Id. p. 7. The historical record is conclusive that the Commission has no power to require a COA for any element of the Project. The Order was premised upon an erroneous understanding of the Commission’s authority, is without legal basis, and must be reversed. 7. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, we are asking for the City Council to direct the Building Official to rescind the Order. The decision of the Commission should be reversed, and the City Council should find that the Project did not require review and approval of the Commission. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Sincerely, /s/ Bryan J. Huntington Bryan J. Huntington, for Larkin Hoffman Direct Dial: 952-896-1525 Direct Fax: 952-842-1747 Email: bhuntington@larkinhoffman.com cc: 1. James Hovland (JHovland@EdinaMN.gov) 2. Ron Anderson (RAnderson@EdinaMN.gov) 3. Carolyn Jackson (CJackson@EdinaMN.gov) 4. James Pierce (JPierce@EdinaMN.gov) 5. Kevin Staunton (KStaunton@EdinaMN.gov) 6. David Kendall, Esq. (Edina City Attorney) (DKendall@ck-law.com) 4873-8948-0753, v. 1 4633 Arden Avenue Appeal denial of COA Amendment 4633 Arden Project Goals •We have lived in Country Club for 12 years. •Purchased 4633 Arden to create an empty nester home with a main floor master with bedrooms upstairs for grown children to visit. Edina’s Comp Plan talks about a shortage of this type of home in Edina. •Maintain the historic character of the home while making a compatible use for the home. • Integrate green building techniques GNH has successfully renovated 8 homes in the District while keeping with the goals of the Plan of Treatment Recently completed similar renovation at 4630 Drexel 4633 Arden Renovation Plan 4633 Arden Renovation Plan Maintain original architecture Less than 50% exterior walls removed. COA Amendment Request •Replace existing deteriorated brick with Tundrabrick. We also wanted a white brick look that required no maintenance (vs painting brick) •Add small window to main gable for natural light in future grandchildren’s playroom. •Slightly expand width of dormer to allow stairway headroom, insulation, and flashing. Reasons for replacing brick •We obtained a building permit on 10/18/21.With the building permit issued we started remodeling work on existing home. •We started removing the exterior brick from the rear and sides of home. We realized that the existing brick was deteriorated and that there was an insufficient weather barrier to maintain a drainage plane behind the existing brick. The one layer of building paper was crumbling and brittle. The paper had insufficient coverage as it was not lapped properly in a waterfall fashion (reverse lapped in several areas). The paper was not nailed sufficiently and had nail holes. • There was also no flashing over the windows. We continued to remove brick and realized the inadequate weather barrier was an issue on the front of the home as well. The front brick was also deteriorated and crumbling so could not be reused like we had intended. We did not believe removing the existing brick was a problem as The Plan of Treatment for the Country Club District (POT) clearly states that a COA is not required for “removal of existing siding, roofing, trim, fascia, soffit, eave moldings, windows, and doors.” •The existing brick was not reusable is it was crumbling and we could recover very few whole bricks. Replacement with Tundrabrick vs original brick (painted white) Why proposing Tundrabrick for replacement of original brick •Our masonry suppler, Hedberg, advised us that using the same brick is not feasible under today’s building code. The only thing available is a reclaimed Chicago brick that does not comply with today’s standard for construction (grade SW) as it has a higher absorption rate than brick that are manufactured today.  •The Tundrabrick material duplicates the original brick as close as possible among options we considered. The Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation states that if using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible, then a compatible substitute material may be considered. The Plan of Treatment states "Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. “ The tundra brick, when installed and viewed from the street, will have the same face height, width, depth and texture as the old brick. It also has the same design with a tumbled and rough face look of the existing brick. Consultant Robert Vogel’s Report at the 8/11/22 HPC Meeting “Regarding replacement of the historic brick wall cladding, the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation state that deteriorated architectural features should be repaired, rather than replaced, “whenever possible”; however, if replacement is necessary, “the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities.” The best practice for replacing old brick is to use new brick that duplicates the old as closely as possible—this assumes that the actual historic brick used in the original construction is no longer available. It is unlikely that the face brick used in 1938 is still being manufactured.” Why proposing Tundrabrick for replacement of original brick (Cont.) •The tundra brick will allow us to achieve our goal of this home participating in Edina’s Climate Action Plan. Under Section 3 Building and Energy, Section BE2, the Climate Action Plan is to “Increase adoption of high performance building construction technology, achieving 5% net zero homes community wide by 2023. Per Edina’s Net Zero Guide p. 60-5 E5 Insulate for High Performance Efficiency: Appropriate insulation levels are one of the key considerations for achieving a high energy performance and cost effective Net Zero Energy home. An important concept in high performing building insulation is “continuous insulation (c.i.)” Continuous insulation focuses on the elimination of thermal bridging (heat transfer through framing materials). Per the Edina Net Zero  Home Guide, the minimum exterior continuous insulation R factor for a wood framed wall is 12.5 per this table: Why proposing Tundrabrick for replacement of original brick (Cont.) •Our plan for the Tundrabrick is to put 2 1/2 of rigid foam insulation on the exterior of the framing sheathing. This will achieve Edina’s minimum Net Zero goals for continuous insulation. This will also give the same brick depth as the original brick as it was installed in the house. The depth will allow for the same design as the original brick (height, width, depth, texture). It will also allow for the same brick design depth of inset windows, doors, corners, and original fine details (brick corbels). Here is a photo of the tundra brick with 2.5” of insulation over the original home brick:     Regarding the compatibility of painted white brick homes in the neighborhood, there was some concern at the last HPC meeting that there weren’t other painted white brick homes in the neighborhood. Here are some photos of other painted brick homes in the neighborhood: Additional white brick homes the District HPC Precedents Approving Modern Materials in the District The HPC and Plan of Treatment has set precedents of allowing replacement of original exterior materials with modern construction materials throughout the District. 1) The POT and HPC allows replacement of wood clapboard siding with modern materials such as James Hardie fiber cement siding. James Hardie fiber cement siding looks the same as wood clapboard from the street even though it is made from a different material and has a thinner profile than wood clapboard siding. 2) The POT and HPC allow asphalt, plastic, and metal roof shingles to replace original slate or clay tile roofing. In fact, homeowners in the District can replace their siding or roofing with these materials without the requirement of a COA from the HPC. Examples of James Hardie Siding and Metal Roofs Approved in the District COA Amendment to Add Small Window to main Gable •We requested an amendment to COA to add small window to main gable to add natural light to future grandkid’s playroom. COA Amendment to Add Small Window to main Gable •Small window additions are common the District and don’t require a COA. •Consultant Vogel’s report at the 8/11/22 HPC Meeting: With respect to the proposed addition of a small window in the front-facing gable wall, the visual impact of the change should be minimal and in my opinion compatible with the house’s original design. No historically important architectural details will be destroyed or obscured. “ •Small windows on main gables are very common in the district: COA Amendment to Slightly Expand Previously Approved Shed Dormer •After the original COA was approved for the shed dormer, we realized in drafting that the dormer needed to be expanded slightly to allow for structural support, stairway headroom, and window flashing. •This adjustment was on the plans submitted for the building permit and were approved by Planning and Building Depts on 10/18/21. COA Amendment to Slightly Expand Previously Approved Shed Dormer Consultant Vogel presented his professional opinion which stated: “In my professional opinion, the proposed façade alterations are minimal and compatible with the house’s original design. Attic windows and shed- roofed dormers are characteristic of homes inspired by the American Arts and Crafts Movement, which lasted from the 1880s until the 1920s. This type of dormer is actually quite common in the Country Club neighborhood, where it occurs as a minor decorative feature on both “period revival” (Colonial, Tudor and Mediterranean) and “mid- century modern” (Minimal Traditional, Neocolonial, and Ranch) style homes. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation allow for façade alterations on heritage resources so long as the new work preserves the features which are significant to the property’s historical, architectural and cultural values. Because no historic character defining architectural features will be destroyed or obscured by the new construction, the new window and enlarged dormer should be considered appropriate. Thank you for considering this appeal. We are long time residents of Country Club. We really don’t want to renovate this home in a way that would hurt the historic character of the neighborhood. As a local builder, we would also not want to design this renovation in a way that would adversely impact our business brand. It is important that the Country Club Plan of Treatment and decisions by the HPC strike a balance between government regulation and private stewardship. We feel or project as proposed will be maintain and enhance the historic character of the District while rehabilitating a home for the next generation of homeowners. 4633 Arden Avenue Certificate of Appropriateness Appeal 4633 Arden Avenue www.EdinaMN.gov 2 www.EdinaMN.gov 3 2021 COA Existing Elevation 2021 COA Approved Elevations www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Photos for Stop Work Order Issued May 17, 2022 Photos included with July COA Amendment submittal July HPC Meeting Submittal www.EdinaMN.gov 5 2021 COA Approved Elevations Tundrabrick (Brick Veneer) August HPC Submittal Building Materials www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Option 1: Tundrabrick (Brick Veneer) Option 2: Modular Winter Mist (Full Brick) Option 3: Welshire Tumbled Brick with a painted finish (Full Brick) www.EdinaMN.gov 7 2021 COA Approved Elevations August 2022 Proposed Elevation Changes Action by the HPC •“Motion made by Commissioner Pollock, seconded by Commissioner Hassenstab, to deny the proposed COA changes and approving option 2, Modular winter mist full brick as the approved building material.” The motion passed 5-1. www.EdinaMN.gov 8 •The HPC approved building material option 2, modular winter mist (full brick) and denied the changes to the façade that were presented. Requiring that the project follow the original elevations approved April 2021. 2021 COA Approved Elevations HPC Considered the following Standards of Rehabilitation www.EdinaMN.gov 9 •The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. •Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. •Distinctive features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. •New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historical materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. www.EdinaMN.gov 10 Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. Appeal of Denial of Certificate of Appropriateness Presentation by Bryan J. Huntington, Esq. Larkin Hoffman Edina City Council Meeting October 6, 2022 Applicant Applied for the Amended COA After the Building Inspector Posted a Stop Work Order Claiming that Commission Approval was Required Before Replacing Brick Cladding •Applicant sought the amended COA in response to the posting of a stop work order (the “Order)on the Property on May 17, 2022 by David Fisher,Building Official.The Order reads: •This property has a violation of the COA from Planning and HPC.Brick was removed from the exterior of the home and left....This will need to have planning approval before the stop work can be removed. 1. Under State Law, the Jurisdiction of the Commission is Limited to Authority Granted by City Ordinance •Minnesota Statute §471.193 allows municipalities to create heritage preservation commissions. With respect to the powers of such commissions, the statute reads: “The powers and duties of any commission established pursuant to this section may include any power possessed by the political subdivision creating the commission, but shall be those delegated or assigned by the ordinance establishing the commission.” Minn. Stat. §417.193, Subd. 4 (emphasis added). “[N]o action of a commission shall contravene any provision of a municipal zoning or planning ordinance unless expressly authorized by ordinance.” Id. The Edina City Code Defines and Limits the Jurisdiction of the Commission •City Code Section 36-722(a)states: •To protect significant heritage resources,the heritage preservation board shall review all applications for city permits for the following types of work in relation to a designated heritage landmark: •(1)Demolition of any building or structure,in whole or in part; •(2)Moving a building or structure to another location; •(3)Excavation of archeological features,grading or earth moving in areas believed to contain significant buried heritage resources;and •(4)New construction. •Under the City Code,only in these four specific circumstances must a COA be obtained from the Commission. See City Code §36-722(b)(“No city permits for the work described in subsection (a)of this section will be issued without a certificate of appropriateness signed by the city planner and approved by the heritage preservation board[.]”) The Plan of Treatment Further Narrows the Jurisdiction of the Commission •The adopted revised Plan of Treatment is consistent with the limited scope as described by Vogel.It requires alandownertoobtainaCOAfor“demolition,moving buildings,and new construction within the district.”The fullPlanofTreatmentdefinitionof“demolition”reads: •Demolition –For purposes of design review and compliance with City Code §850.20 subd.10,demolition shall mean the physical alteration of a building that requires a city permit andwhere:•(a)50%or more of the surface area of all exterior walls,in the aggregate,are removed;or•(b)50%or more of the principal roof structure is removed,changing its shape,pitch or height;or•(c)A front porch,side porch,vestibule,dormer,chimney,attached garage,or porte-cochere isremovedordestroyed. •This definition does not include removal of existing siding,trim,fascia,soffit,eave moldings,windows,and doors. (Emphasis added.) •With respect to new construction,the Plan of Treatment pertains to new home construction and new garages.The plan of treatment contains a section under the header “voluntary compliance.”This section reads: •“The City will promote voluntary compliance with historic preservation standards for the rehabilitation ofindividualhistoricpropertiesbyencouragingrepairs,additions,or alterations which make possible an efficientcontemporaryuseofolderhomesinthedistrictwhilepreservingthosefeaturesthatarehistoricallyandarchitecturallysignificant. •“Although not ordinarily subject to Certificates of Appropriateness,small additions or minor alterations shouldbedoneinsuchamannerthattheydonotdestroyhistoricallysignificantarchitecturalfeatures.New additionsshouldbedifferentiatedfromhistoricarchitectureanddesignedtobecompatiblewiththesize,scale,color,material,and character of the property.” Relevant Statements From Public Hearings at Time of Adoption of Revised Plan of Treatment •Meeting minutes from a meeting of the board dated November 13,2007,contain comments from the City’s preservationconsultant,Robert Vogel.Vogel specifically addressed the following question:“Should Certificates of Appropriateness berequiredforstructuralalterationsandadditions?”11/13/2007 HPB Minutes p.4.Vogel’s response to that question iscopiedhere: •Regarding the issue of reviewing additions and alteration projects,the current City of Edina heritagepreservationcodedoesnotrequireCertificatesofAppropriatenessforexterioralterationsoradditionsonanybuildingswithinadesignatedheritagelandmarkdistrict.The primary emphasis onthecodeisonpreventingteardownsofhistoric(i.e.,contributing)properties and applyingarchitecturaldesignstandardstonewconstruction.The protection,repair,and replacementofexteriorfeaturesonhistorichomesislefttothehomeowners. •Because no form of government regulation of private property is perfect (there will always be‘loopholes’and property owners willing to circumvent the official controls),requiring Certificates ofAppropriatenessforexteriorremodelingandsmalladditionswouldnotincreasethelong-termbenefitsofheritagelandmarkzoningforthecommunityatlarge.In my opinion,it would be better toaddresstheproblemsposedbyinappropriatefaçaderemodelingandout-of-scale additions throughmoreintensivepubliceducation[.] •Vogel summed up that the “heritage landmark code and the political process that shaped it have placed limits on theauthorityoftheHeritagePreservationBoardtoprescribeanyparticularpreservationtreatmentoutsideofdemolitionandnewconstructioninrelationtoprivatelyownedproperty.” Judicial Standards of Interpretation Applicable to City Ordinances. •The interpretation of a city code is an issue of law which a court will review without deference to the municipality.Frank’s Nursery Sales,Inc.v.City of Roseville,295 N.W.2d 604,608 (Minn.1980).Zoning ordinances are construed:(1)according to their plain and ordinary meaning;(2)strictly against a city and in favor of a landowner;and (3)in light of their underlying policy goals.Id.A court will hold a city “strictly”to its own standards.Id. •A court must give weight to the interpretation of the ordinance that,“while still within the confines of the [ordinance],is least restrictive upon the rights of the property owner to use [its]land as [it]wishes.”Id.at 608-609. Appellant Had No Legal Obligation to Seek a COA for the Project; the Order is Legally Unsupported and Should be Rescinded. •Nothing in the text or history of the City Code or the Plan of TreatmentauthorizedthePlanningDepartmenttocompelAppellanttoobtainaCOAtocarryouttheProject. •The starting point in the analysis is the City’s jurisdictional grant of authorityunderCityCodeSection36-722(a).The only arguably applicable component is“demolition.”That term is expressly defined by the Plan. •By proposing to remove and replace cladding—which is just one form of housesiding—Appellant is proposing to perform an activity expressly excluded fromthedefinitionofdemolition. •The history behind the 2008 amendment to the Plan of Treatment resolvesanydoubtabouttheintentionstheCityhadregardingtheCommission’sjurisdiction.The historical record is conclusive that the Commission has nopowertorequireaCOAforanyelementoftheProject. Relief Requested •We are asking for the City Council to direct the Building Official to rescind the Order. •The decision of the Commission should be reversed, and the City Council should find that the Project did not require review and approval of the Commission. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2022-95: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2022-95 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2022-95: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2022-95 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation  Donna Hipps $3,200 Park Bench at St. John’s Park Dated: October 6, 2022 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 6, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2022. City Clerk Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2022-77 and Ordinance No. 2022-11: Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision at 5146 Eden Avenue (Former Public Works Site) Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2022-77 and grant first reading of Ordinance No. 2022-11 approving the proposed project. INTRODUCTION: United Properties and Jester Concepts are proposing to re-develop the 3.3-acre vacant old public works site at 5146 Eden Ave. As proposed, at full build out, the site would include: A 6-1/2-story, 86-unit senior cooperative project (owner occupied) with underground parking. (Applewood P ointe Cooperative) Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing (9 units). A two-story, 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant with 31 surface parking stalls. Additional parking would rely on the public Jerry’s parking ramp to the west. A 31,643 square foot green space/public plaza area with pedestrian walkways to the pedestrian bridge, now under construction, that will connect the Jerry’s parking ramp. Phase 1 of the project would be the senior housing development. Phase 2 would be the restaurant site, followed by the park. The P hase 2 portion of the project would require future site and building plan review and approval of the P lanning Commission and City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report and Memos Traffic and Parking Study Presentation - Evolution of the Grandview Yard Proposal Draft PUD Ordinance Plans and Renderings 1 of 3 Plans and Renderings 2 of 3 Plans and Renderings 3 of 3 Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Grandview Development Framework Grandview Transportation Study Resolution No. 2022-77 (Approval) Resolution No. 2022-77 (Denial) Staff Presntation - Evolution of Grandview Yard Proposal United Properties and Jester Concepts are proposing to re-develop the 3.3-acre vacant old public work site at 5146 Eden Avenue. As proposed, at full build out, the site would include: A 6-1/2-story, 86-unit senior cooperative project (owner occupied) with underground parking. (Applewood Pointe Cooperative) Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing (9 units). A two-story, 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant with 31 surface parking stalls. Additional parking would rely on the public Jerry’s parking ramp to the west. A 31,643 square foot green space/public plaza area with pedestrian walkways to the pedestrian bridge, now under construction, that will connect the Jerry’s parking ramp. Phase 1 of the project would be the senior housing development. Phase 2 would be the restaurant site, followed by the park. The Phase 2 portion of the project would require future site and building plan review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. To accommodate the request the following is required: Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Subdivision. The Rezoning includes an Overall Development Plan for the entire site, as the project will be developed in phases. Flexibility is requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from setback, building height, building material, parking, and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The PUD Zoning is also used to ensure the affordable housing on the site. August 24, 2022 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision at 5146 Eden Avenue (Former Public Works Site) Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 The applicant did go through the sketch plan process and have made the following changes to the plans based on the feedback:  Reduced the number of parking stalls for the senior housing from 173 to 143 stalls.  Recessed and highly articulated facades to facilitate building scale:  The center of the east façade facing Arcadia has been further recessed from 5-0 previous setback to a 7-0 setback.  Additional building articulation is created by recesses at the stair towers and exits.  The top level of the of the east façade’s center has been even further recessed an additional 8-0 in depth to create a continuous resident and library balcony facing Arcadia.  Southeast and Northeast corner units have oversized balconies to soften and articulate the most visually prominent corners of the building.  Projecting roof elements at the building’s corners create visual interest.  The Co-op’s west wing’s top floor has full-width balconies on the north and south ends, creating deep shadow lines and accentuating the building massing.  Contrasting materials, including brick, cast stone and metal have been used to articulate the building’s massing and bring visual interest to its facades  Resident balconies along Arcadia Avenue promote activity and recessed to promote safety:  All units along Arcadia Avenue have recessed balconies activating and addressing the street.  Incorporated Building circulation into landscape terraces; Stairway Connections to Arcadia:  Stairways and entrances are integrated into the landscape terracing and connect the building directly to the public sidewalk at Arcadia  Landscaped terracing along Eden and Arcadia screens and softens the sidewalk to building transition.  Portions of the landscape terracing have built in seating for pedestrian use.  Public Art Sculpture locates in prominent areas:  The prominent sweeping corner at Eden Avenue and Arcadia is accentuated by a location for public art, surrounded by landscaped terracing and seating adjacent to the sidewalk.  Site-wide Landscape & Terrace Concept with seating to activate pedestrian interaction:  Geometric landscaped terracing with integrated seating lines the sidewalk along Eden and Arcadia and create pedestrian-friendly edges.  The terraces and seating visually connect to terracing and seating throughout the site, including Restaurant and Grandview Yard areas.  Street Connection at South Outdoor Plaza:  At the lower level, a large south-facing outdoor plaza is created along Eden Avenue and the public sidewalk, with seating and landscaping adjacent to a resident entrance.  Resident bicycle, pet care and workshop spaces have been moved to line the south façade at this plaza, with large, glazed storefront-type openings facing the public sidewalk and Eden Avenue. STAFF REPORT Page 3 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Retails shopping; zoned PCD-2, Planned Commercial District, and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Easterly: Office building; zoned POD, Planned Office District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Southerly: Our Lady of Grace church and school; R-1, Single dwelling unit district and guided LDR, Low Density Residential. Westerly: Railroad Tracks, Jerry’s public parking ramp and commercial uses; zoned PCD-2, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Existing Site Features The subject property is 3.3 acres in size, slops up from Eden Avenue and contains a surface parking lot which served the old public works operation. Planning Guide Plan designation: MXC, Mixed Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Zoning: PID, Planned Industrial District Site Circulation/Traffic Primary vehicular access to the senior housing off both Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue. Access to the restaurant and park would be off Arcadia. Pedestrian sidewalks would be provided along Eden and Arcadia, through the park which would connect to the pedestrian bridge over the railroad tracks to connect to the public parking ramp. SEH conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the proposed project can be supported by the existing roads and proposed new configuration of Arcadia and Eden Avenue, including the round-a-bout. (See attached traffic study.) The study does make the following recommendations:  The Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection be monitored in the future to understand if there are any future operations or queueing concerns that should be addressed once development changes occur and as general background traffic volumes increase.  Signal timing adjustments and coordination along Vernon Avenue may be necessary to accommodate background traffic demand in addition to new development traffic. Specifically monitor signal timings at the Vernon Ave/SB TH 100 interchange ramp and Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd.  Consider spacing the two proposed driveways on Arcadia Avenue further apart to avoid turning conflicts or driver confusion.  Encourage public parking in the parking ramp for the restaurant to double trips onto the roadway network. STAFF REPORT Page 4  Monitor valet parking activity and circulation to mitigate safety issues on Arcadia Ave during peak periods. Parking Based on the proposal for an 86-unit senior co-operative and a 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant 231 spaces are required: 65 for the senior housing and 166 for the restaurant. The project proposes 143 spaces for the housing and 31stalls for the restaurant. Public parking stalls are available adjacent to the restaurant site in the Jerry’s parking ramp. A parking study was done by SEH, which concludes that there is an average of 215 unused parking stalls available. These stalls would provide the additional parking stalls needed to accommodate the proposed restaurant and public park. (See pages 10-11 in the attached traffic and parking study.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 41 overstory trees would be required. The applicant is proposing 85 overstory trees in the boulevards along the public-streets and the interior of the project. (See attached landscape plan.) A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in their review memo. (See attached memo dated August 18, 2022.) The phase 1 grading would be completed by the housing developer; the city would then grade the restaurant site and the park site. A Site Improvement Plan Agreement would be required for each final site plan approval. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building Material The building materials for the senior housing would be a combination of polycarbonate panel, metal panel, stone and glass. (See attached renderings.) The applicant is requesting flexibility on building material (brick and stone) at the base 60 feet up, 20-foot height at the first floor, and the 75% transparency at ground level. The building will have stone at the base of the building, but not 60 feet high. The buildings will be transparent on the first floor, just not up to 75%. Due to the building being all residential, the proposed first floor height is reasonable. Mechanical Equipment No mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Signage The signage allowed on the site should correspond to the use. The housing uses would be subject to sign regulations of a residential district; the retail/restaurant uses would be subject to sign regulations of commercial districts. This would be written into the PUD Ordinance. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant would be installing boulevard sidewalks Arcadia and Eden Avenue. Part of this City project includes the construction of a pedestrian bridge over the railroad tracks to connect to the Jerry’s public parking ramp. This will open up shared parking opportunities for the subject property, as well as adjacent properties to the north and east. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Grandview Development Framework The proposed plans contain two key elements in the Framework: A bridge that would connect the Jerry’s parking ramp and a large public green space. (Bridge is currently under construction.) Plans show the bridge and a 31,643 square foot public plaza. (See attached Development Framework Document.) The applicant has done a nice job addressing the 7 Guiding Principles for the Grandview District as demonstrated below. (Taken from page 7 in the applicant submittal package.) 1. CREATE VIBRANT CONNECTED DISTRICT The proposed combination of residential, commercial and public space adds vibrancy to the surrounding commercial and multi-family neighbors. Public art elements will be included on each of the three sites to create a unique place that is connected by roadways, sidewalks and bicycle access. Future access to the railroad is possible if freight operations were to cease in the future. The mixture of uses are intentionally selected to create a catalyst that may inspire other aging properties to redevelop in a similarly vibrant manner. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER WITH REGIONAL CONNECTIONS The proposed scale of development is appropriate for a new mixed-use neighborhood while also taking advantage of the regional connections via Highway 100 and local road network. Residential senior cooperative living expanded dining services and amenities, and a public green-space combine to create a new place for neighborhood residents of all ages to visit and experience. Private development tax capacity generation, with new home ownership opportunities for Edina residents are combined with a new hospitality, dining and event destination and a new public space, all within easy reach of neighborhoods on both sides of Highway 100. 3. TURN PERCEIVED BARRIERS INTO OPPORTUNITIES The site’s elevations and grading are used to create a terraced, cascading topography from the pedestrian bridge and connecting trail at the north down to the Grandview Yard, stepping down to outdoor dining and activities areas at the Restaurant, and finally utilized for below-grade residential parking and features at the Senior Cooperative. The railroad track barrier is now spanned to better connect properties throughout the district and improving access to existing parking resources. 4. DESIGN FOR THE PRESENT & FUTURE The development considers current and future needs by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive and life-filled place. Landscaped terraces and outdoor activity and seating areas line Arcadia Avenue leading up to Grandview Yard with its pedestrian trails and bridge connection. These features will shape the land use patterns of adjacent parcels and future area development, connecting the district with existing parking resources. 5. ORGANIZE PARKING The plan strategically minimizes surface parking by maximizing below-grade parking and shared access routes along with shared use of existing public parking facilities. The Restaurant site provides only 31 parking spaces and relies on shared public parking with valet drop off service. The Senior Cooperative provides minimal short-term and drop off parking stalls and features indoor guest parking at the north entrance level, with all resident parking and move-in access located below- grade and accessed from Eden Avenue. The adjacent Grandview Parking Structure has been improved to serve as a safe and welcoming resource for existing users as well as future visitors to the new Grandview Yard. 6. IMPROVE MOVEMENT FOR ALL AGES The development improves movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation and preserving future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. In addition to its pedestrian and bike-friendly north/south connections, it spans the railroads to connect the District east/west and does not hinder future transit if freight operations STAFF REPORT Page 7 were to cease in the future. Roadway improvements to Eden and Arcadia are currently underway, and the new pedestrian bridge and trail are also under construction. 7. CREATE AN IDENTITY & SENSE OF PLACE The development incorporates natural spaces into high quality and sustainable development that reflects Edina’s innovative development heritage. The combination of the Grandview Yard with a privately operated hospitality, dining and event destination creates an overlapping synergy of activities and opportunities, year-round. Combined with the animating vitality of 86 ownership residential living units, a sustainable and unique identity is created unlike any other in Edina. Each element of the redevelopment site will feature public art to engage visitors, residents and the community. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. 2. Applicability/Criteria STAFF REPORT Page 8 a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The proposed plans meet the above standards to justify a PUD. The project includes significant pedestrian improvements, most important is the pedestrian bridge over the railroad track, which the City of Edina currently has under construction. The proposal includes a restaurant, which will attract people to the areas and the proposed public park on the north end. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The project reduces parking on the site by taking advantage of the existing Jerry’s public parking ramp. The project includes 10% of the units within the project for affordable housing. As a rezoning, this project is subject to the City’s Sustainability Policy. The sustainability manager has reviewed the proposal and submitted comments within the engineering memo. (See attached.) Comprehensive Plan The proposal also meets the following goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan: 1. The 9 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. 2. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. STAFF REPORT Page 9 3. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 4. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses.” 5. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” 6. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. 7. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” Subdivision The proposed subdivision simply reconfigures the three existing lots. STAFF REPORT Page 10 COMPLIANCE TABLE City Standard (PID) Comp. Plan Proposed (Measured from building to the lot line) Building Setbacks to the perimeter lot line - Residential Front – East (Eden Avenue) Front – South (Arcadia Avenue) Side – West Rear – North Building Setbacks to the perimeter lot line - Restaurant Front – East (Eden Avenue) Front – South (Arcadia Avenue) Side – West Rear – North based on height (79 feet) based on height (79 feet) based on height (79 feet) based on height (79 feet) based on height (30 feet) based on height (30 feet) based on height (30 feet) based on height (30 feet) 5 feet* 5 feet* 10 feet* 100+ feet 100+ feet 100+ feet 10 feet* 100+ feet Density 20-100 units/acre Compliant (26 units per acre) Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet 6.5 stories* Restaurant is Code Compliant Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 45% .50% (Adjacent zoning PCD-2 Zoning allows 1.5 FAR) – Comp Plan Guides the site for PCD-2 Uses 34% 1.4%* Parking Stalls – Residential (Senior Housing) Parking Stalls – Restaurant .75 units per unit = 65 spaces One space per 3 seats + one space per employee on a max. shift (166 spaces) 143 spaces Variance required (31 spaces on site plus the Jerry’s parking ramp) *Variance Required STAFF REPORT Page 11 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues  Is the proposed development reasonable to justify PUD rezoning of this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised PUD, for the following reasons: 1. The location of this site in the Mixed-Use Center in the Grandview District. While the existing zoning is PID, Planned Industrial District to reflect the previous public works facility, the surrounding zoning is predominantly PCD-2, Planned Commercial District. The PCD District allows restaurants and multifamily housing. Therefore, the uses proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the surrounding zoning. 2. The provision of public space (public park) makes up 23% of the site. The proposed restaurant and park shall blend together. 3. The pedestrian experience along Eden and Arcadia Avenue would be improved compared to existing conditions. The pedestrian bridge over the railroad tracks will open all uses east of the railroad tracks the Jerry’s parking ramp and commercial uses to the west. 4. The project would provide 10% of the units (9 units) within the building for affordable housing for seniors earning 50% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. These units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. This is the first multifamily ownership development containing affordable housing units that has been reviewed in recent years. It complies with strategies outlined by the Housing Strategy Task Force and the Comprehensive Plan. (See more detail in the attached memo from the Affordable Housing Development Manager.) 5. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Mixed Use Center, which allows for retail and multi-family housing in a density range of 20-100 units per acre. The applicant is proposing to use the site as a horizontal mixed-use development including multi-family residential, restaurant and park. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy, by including the units in the residential building (9 units). The restaurant will attract people to the areas and the proposed public park on the north end. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The project reduces parking on the site by taking advantage of the existing Jerry’s public parking ramp. 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. SEH conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the proposed project can be supported by the existing roads and proposed new configuration of Arcadia and Eden Avenue, including the round-a-bout. STAFF REPORT Page 12 Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below provides options for the planning commission and city council to consider: Approval Recommend the City Council approve the request for Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Subdivision. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. The project provides 9 units of affordable housing within the development. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The provision of public space (public park) makes up 23% of the site. The pedestrian experience along Arcadia and Eden would be improved. The pedestrian bridge over the railroad tracks connects uses to the east to the Jerry’s public parking ramp. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. The 9 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. b. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. STAFF REPORT Page 13 c. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. d. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses.” e. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” f. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. g. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. SEH conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the proposed project can be supported by the existing roads and proposed new configuration of Arcadia and Eden Avenue, including the round-a-bout. 7. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to existing conditions and previous development on the site. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated July 25, 2022. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. STAFF REPORT Page 14 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy and sustainable buildings policy. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated August 18, 2022. 10. Compliance with the SEH Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 13. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 14. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated August 15, 2022. 15. Maintenance of sidewalks and streets internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Arcadia Ave will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. Public sidewalk shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard. Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Seven Guiding Principles of the Grandview District. 2. The project does not include vertical mixed uses. STAFF REPORT Page 15 3. The proposed housing project is too large for the site, including the setbacks too closed to the front lot lines. 4. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The proposal does not meet the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City decision: November 15, 2022 TO: Cary Teague, Community Development Director FROM: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager DATE: January 10, 2022 RE: Grandview Yards Site Plan Submittal The proposed 5146 Eden plan entails redeveloping a City owned parcel that has been vacant for many years. On the south end is a proposed 90-unit senior cooperative, of which 10% or 9 units will available at affordable prices per the Affordable Housing Policy. This is the first multifamily ownership development containing affordable housing units that has been reviewed in recent years. It complies with strategies outlined by the Housing Strategy Task Force and the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1: Seek to accommodate the total new households projected to locate in the city by the year 2040. Goal 1.1e: Providing lifecycle housing opportunities to allow residents to remain in the city throughout all life stages Goal 1.1.f: Addressing climate change through higher density development patterns that help reduce vehicle emissions Goal 2.9: Promote owner-occupied units over rental units when providing affordable housing. Goal 3.2: Where appropriate and guided by city policy, encourage the development of walkable neighborhoods that provide a range of daily needs within walking distance, potentially reducing reliance on cars. Goal 4.1: Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land guided for residential/commercial mixed-use while promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives. Goal 4.2: Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a range of ages, incomes, abilities, and other demographics, and offers a range of housing options. Compliance with Housing Strategy Task Force Report Goal 1: Promote lifecycle housing. Actively work to create lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people’s preferences and circumstances in all stages of life, such as renters, first-time homebuyers, empty nesters, and seniors. I understand there may be concerns regarding the perceived concentration of age restricted housing in this area. I am not concerned by this. Rather with the library, senior center and other amenities I think it is appropriate. Furthermore, there is a great need for more housing options for seniors. August 15, 2022 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Dave Ehmiller, Fire Marshal 5146 Eden Ave S – Grandview Project – Senior Cooperative Apartment five-stories and two-levels of underground parking – a three-level building including a Restaurant. Information / Background: New seven-story & five-story apartment building with 86-units with underground parking. In addition to a new three-story building that includes a restaurant. -The Co-op Apartment would be an S-1 Parking and R-2 Residential apartment building, and the restaurant building would be an A-2 Assembly using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code and adopted appendices. -Separate addresses will be required for each building. -Separate permits will be required for each building. -Provide a complete Building Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. -An NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required in each building. -Buildings two (2) or more stories in height shall be provided with shut-off valves and water-flow devices for each floor. -A permanent map is to be located at the FAAP and main sprinkler riser. The map shall show the location of control valves and drains for each sprinkler zone. A space shall be provided at the main riser for annual sprinkler test papers. -All Fire Department connections must be no more than 100 feet from an accessible fire hydrant and within 50 feet of the main entrance; be fully visible and immediately accessible by fire personnel for each building (placement subject to approval by AHJ) -Fire department access roads are to be installed and maintained per 2020 MSFC or per AHJ approval for the whole site and for each building. -Ensure adequate Emergency Responder Radio Coverage per policy number SP-022-F2 in each building. -See Fire Permits and Policies page on the city website for additional information. (https://www.edinamn.gov/717/Fire-Permits-Policies) -Verify there is adequate assessable parking. This has been an issue in some of the older buildings. -Recommend that one EMS accessible elevator is provided for the residential Co-op STAFF REPORT Page 2 -Verify noise ordinance will be complied with and that it’s understood. -Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed -Verify Address and recommend a 30, 60 and 90 percent meeting with staff before applying for the building permit. DATE: 8/18/2022 TO: 5146 Eden Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer RE: 5146 Eden Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, and survey drawings dated July 25, 2022. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Maintenance of sidewalks and streets internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Arcadia Ave will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, this would be the responsibility of the owner. General Comment 3. Provide easement for existing watermain onsite. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 4. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 7. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard. Grading/Building Permit 8. Staff recommends consideration of marked/raised crosswalks within parking lot to prioritize pedestrian circulation. General Comment 9. Staff recommends inclusion of more ramps throughout the site to improve accessibility. General Comment Traffic and Street 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 11. Provide traffic study and implement City-approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 12. Driveway entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction and the two new entrances on Arcadia. Building Permit 13. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 525, 540, & 541on Eden Ave. patching on Arcadia Ave shall conform to 540 and 543. Certificate of Occupancy 14. Provide easements, if necessary, for sidewalk facilities where city has maintenance responsibility. Certificate of Occupancy 15. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 16. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 17. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 18. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 19. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 19.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 19.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 20. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 21. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 22. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 23. A verified well is located onsite. Wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Well sealing record required prior to building construction. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 24. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 25. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 26. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 27. Additional detail needed to confirm positive drainage away from proposed buildings’ foundations. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 28. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 29. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 30. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Various proposed onsite. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 26. This project must comply with Edina’s Sustainable Buildings Policy. Developer should contact Sustainability Manager Grace Hancock to initiative compliance process. General Comment Other Agency Coordination 27. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 28. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Grandview Yard Traffic Study Edina, Minnesota EDINA EDINA 168382 | August 2022 GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 ES-1 Executive Summary Background & Purpose The City of Edina requested a traffic study be completed for the proposed Grandview Yard development at 5146 Eden Avenue (old Public Works site). The 3.125-acre parcel is located on the northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue in the City of Edina, Minnesota. The development proposes a 90-unit senior cooperative housing (co-op), a 2-story 13,500 SF dine-in restaurant, and a 0.73-acre green space/public plaza. See Appendix A for a concept of the proposed Grandview Yard development. The existing transportation conditions for the area include the following near-term planned improvements: · Eden Avenue/SB TH 100 Ramp Removal · Eden Avenue at Arcadia Mini-Roundabout · Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Eden Avenue at Willson Road Mini-Roundabouts · Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Bridge Reconstruction, a Hennepin County project, includes pedestrian improvements, a dedicated westbound left-turn land, improved signal timings, and the removal of the southbound free-right turn movement at the TH 100 SB ramp and signal retimings. As part of the no build traffic, the study confirmed the land use sizes and included the estimated trip generation for the planned redevelopments at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 building) and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site). The purposes of the traffic study include a parking demand review for the Grandview Yard development and an analysis of the No Build operations and Build operations associated with the proposed development and the impacts expected on the surrounding roadway network and study intersections. Traffic Study Conclusion Summary: · The parking needs for the Senior Housing development are met per City code and ITE Parking Generation Manual. · The parking needs for the Restaurant development are met per the City code and ITE Parking Generation Manual. This based on the results from the Grandview Parking Ramp study, which concluded adequate capacity in the public parking garage to accommodate additional parking demand in the area. · The proposed Grandview Yard development is expected to generate 1,424 weekday daily new trips, 28 AM peak hour new trips, and 128 PM peak hour new trips. · No Build operations were not significantly impacted by the new trips due to the relatively small number of new trips distributed to each intersection during the peak hours within the Grandview network. · The planned mini-roundabouts along Eden Avenue at Arcadia, Grange, and Willson are all expected to perform well (intersection LOS A) with the 2024 and 2042 Build volumes. · Traffic operations for the 2024 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C and no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. Some queueing concerns exist during the peak hours for the EB and WB approaches at the Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB Ramp and for EB and SB movements at Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd. Executive Summary (continued) GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 ES-2 · Traffic operations for the 2042 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C or better with no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. LOS E is expected for the northbound approach at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave during the AM peak hour with maximum queue lengths extending past the adjacent driveways on Arcadia Ave. Similar queueing concerns as the 2024 No Build scenario are experienced at other study intersections. · Traffic operations for the 2024 Build scenario are comparable to the 2024 No Build conditions. LOS D is experienced for the northbound movement in the AM peak hour at the Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection. · Traffic operations for the 2042 Build scenario are comparable to the 2042 No Build conditions. Some movements, however, experienced increased delay: LOS E for NB and SB approaches at Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd, LOS E for NB right-turn at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave in AM peak hour, and LOS E for the WB approach at Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramp. Recommendations summary: · It is recommended that the Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection be monitored in the future to understand if there are any future operations or queueing concerns that should be addressed once development changes occur and as general background traffic volumes increase. · Signal timing adjustments and coordination along Vernon Avenue may be necessary to accommodate background traffic demand in addition to new development traffic. Specifically monitor signal timings at the Vernon Ave/SB TH 100 interchange ramp and Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd. · Consider spacing the two proposed driveways on Arcadia Avenue further apart to avoid turning conflicts or driver confusion. · Encourage public parking in the parking ramp for the restaurant to double trips onto the roadway network. · Monitor valet parking activity and circulation to mitigate safety issues on Arcadia Ave during peak periods. SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 i Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Relevant Studies and Policies ................................................................ 1 2 Existing Conditions ..................................................... 3 3 Planned Development ................................................ 9 4 Parking Demand Review ............................................ 9 5 Traffic Forecasting ................................................... 11 5.1 Background Forecasting ....................................................................... 11 5.2 Trip Generation – 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) ........................... 11 5.3 Trip Generation – Surrounding Developments ..................................... 12 5.4 Trip Distribution .................................................................................... 14 6 Traffic Operations Analysis ...................................... 15 6.1 Intersection Analysis ............................................................................. 16 6.2 Travel Demand Management Policy Review ........................................ 22 7 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................ 23 List of Tables Table 1 – Trip Generation for 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) ............................. 12 Table 2 – Trip Generation for 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) ......................... 13 Table 3 – Trip Generation for 4917 Eden Ave (Old Perkins Restaurant).................. 13 Table 4 – Level of Service Thresholds ..................................................................... 15 Table 5 – 2024 No Build Operations Summary ........................................................ 17 Table 6 – 2042 No Build Operations Summary ........................................................ 18 Table 7 – 2024 Build Operations Summary .............................................................. 20 Table 8 – 2042 Build Operations Summary .............................................................. 21 List of Figures Figure 1 – Project Location ........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 – Vernon Avenue Reconstruction (2024) ..................................................... 4 Figure 3 – Eden Avenue & Arcadia Mini Roundabout Concept ................................. 5 Contents (continued) GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 ii Figure 4 – Mini Roundabouts Concept on Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road ..................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5 – Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 8 List of Appendices Appendix A Grandview Yard Concept Plan Appendix B Intersection Volume Figures Appendix C Traffic Operational Results GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 Page 1 Grandview Yard Traffic Study Prepared for Edina, Minnesota 1 Introduction 1.1 Background This traffic study was conducted to focus on the traffic impacts due to the proposed development at 5146 Eden Avenue, located on an approximately 3.125-acre parcel on the northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue in the City of Edina. This site is also known as the former public works site for the city and currently sits vacant. Over the past several years, the City has developed a framework for revitalizing the Grandview District, and this development looks to meet the guiding principles and vision set for the district while also supporting other planned projects in the district. See Appendix A for a concept of the proposed Grandview Yard development. The proposed full build out of the 5146 Eden Ave site includes: · 90-unit senior housing cooperative project, including 173 underground parking spaces · 2-story 13,500 square-foot, 347 seat restaurant, including 32 surface parking stalls and use of public parking ramp · 31,643 square-foot green space/public plaza, with connection to future pedestrian bridge (currently under construction) This study also confirmed the land use sizes for the redevelopments occurring at 5100 Eden Avenue and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site) and included the trip generation in the no build traffic conditions for this study. · 5100 Eden Ave: 138 housing units · 4917 Eden Ave: 196 housing units and 3,700 square-foot restaurant 1.2 Relevant Studies and Policies The project area has been studied several times in recent years. Some studies were conducted to develop Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) for redevelopment parcels, while other studies included local roadway and intersection improvements and high-level planning concepts. The following studies and policies were primarily used by either incorporating the data or as a reference: · Parking Study Update for Grandview Parking Ramp (2022) · East Grandview Transportation Study (2021) · Travel Demand Management Policy (2021) · Traffic and Parking Study for 4917 Eden Avenue (2021) · Eden Avenue Traffic Study (2020) · Grandview District Transportation Study (2016) · Grandview District Development Framework (2012) SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 2 Figure 1 – Project Location SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 3 2 Existing Conditions The following is a description of each of the major roadways and intersections within the project area. The bold/italicized text discusses planned roadway improvements that are currently in the design or planning phase and are assumed to be considered “No Build” conditions for the purposes of this study. Highway 100 TH 100 is a north-south freeway facility that extends over 15-miles through the western side of the metro area. Through the interchange, TH 100 has 3-travel lanes in each direction, with a posted speed limit of 60 miles per hour (MPH) and carries approximately 124,000 vehicles per day. Northbound TH 100 has a single low speed (20 MPH) exit ramp that connects to Grange Road. There are two entrance ramps from W. 50th Street to northbound TH 100 with an eastbound loop ramp and a westbound right turn. Southbound TH 100 has a single lane exit to access Vernon Avenue to the west and 50th Street to the east, a connection to a collector-distributer (CD) roadway system also allows access to Arcadia Avenue. There is a single entrance ramp connection to southbound TH 100 that is part of the CD roadway with access from Vernon Avenue. Planned Improvements: Eden Ave/SB TH 100 Ramp Removal The southbound TH 100 on-ramp from Eden Avenue is planned for removal by 2024, and was not included as part of the project year of opening roadway conditions for this study. Vernon Avenue S Vernon Avenue S is a west-east A-Minor Arterial roadway designated as a County State Aid Highway 158 (CSAH 158) for Hennepin County. It is a 4-lane divided roadway that serves as a primary regional corridor, connecting drivers to TH 62, TH 100, residential areas, and commercial areas such as the Grandview District. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Sidewalk facilities exist primarily on the north side of Vernon Avenue S within the focus area. Vernon Avenue S transitions into W 50th Street on the east side of TH 100. Access to both directions of TH 100 is provided from Vernon Avenue. In the study area, the corridor carries between 12,400 to 19,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Planned Improvements: Vernon Ave Bridge Reconstruction Hennepin County is currently in the design phase to reconstruct the Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) bridge over the Canadian Pacific Railroad. The project includes intersection improvements and modifications to the three adjacent intersections of Interlachen Boulevard, Arcadia Avenue, and the TH 100 Southbound ramp terminal. The project is anticipated to begin construction in 2023 and completed in 2024. The following improvements are included in the project area: · Pedestrian Improvements throughout the project area, including: - Widening sidewalks on railroad bridge. - ADA pedestrian ramps at all crossings and new sidewalk connections. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 4 - Improved crossings at both Arcadia Avenue and the TH 100 SB Ramp. · Interlachen Boulevard Intersection: - Adding a westbound left turn lane and signal phase. · TH 100 SB Ramp Terminal Intersection: - Remove southbound free right turn movement and realign to the traffic signal. Figure 2 – Vernon Avenue Reconstruction (2024) W 50th Street W 50th Street and Vernon Avenue S are a common roadway, with Vernon Avenue S designated to the west of TH 100 and W 50th Street designated to the east of TH 100. Like Vernon Avenue S, W 50th Street is also a west-east A-Minor Arterial roadway within the study area. It is a 4-lane roadway that also serves as a regional corridor in the City. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Near the TH 100 overpass, sidewalk facilities exist only on the north side of the roadway. Sidewalk facilities are provided on both sides of the roadway east of Grange Road. In the study area, the corridor carries between 19,000 to 27,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Eden Avenue Eden Avenue is a west-east Minor Collector roadway designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route for the City of Edina. It is a 3-lane undivided roadway that connects between Vernon Avenue to the west and W 50th Street to the east with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (MPH). Sidewalk facilities exist on both sides of the roadway except a short segment with sidewalk only on the south side between Brookside Avenue and Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd; this missing segment will be constructed with a planned 2021 project. Access to southbound TH SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 5 100 is provided from Eden Avenue. In the study area, the corridor carries between 3,600 to 5,200 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Planned Improvements: · TH 100 ramp removal; after Hennepin County Vernon Avenue project (2024). · Eden Ave & Arcadia Mini-Roundabout (2022) The Eden Avenue Traffic Study (2020) completed for the City included the recommendations for improvements along Eden Avenue at both Arcadia Avenue and the TH 100 Southbound ramp terminal intersections. The intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue will be converted from an all-way stop controlled intersection to a mini-roundabout controlled intersection to improve safety and operations. The construction of the roundabout is anticipated in 2022. The analysis showed the current Eden Avenue entrance ramp to southbound TH 100 could be removed without significant impacts to the roadway network. Rerouted traffic to the Vernon Avenue ramp intersection added delays but did not create a considerable impact. The ramp removal reduces the volumes along Eden Avenue and reduces access. The ramp removal is anticipated to be removed in 2024. Figure 3 – Eden Avenue & Arcadia Mini Roundabout Concept Arcadia Avenue and Normandale Road Arcadia Avenue and Normandale Road are two local minor collector roadways included in the study area; both facilities are 2-lane undivided roadways with speed limits of 30 MPH. Arcadia Avenue connects between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue, while Normandale Road extends to the south as a western freeway frontage road. Due to the proximity to the Our Lady of Grace Catholic School (OLG), Normandale Road is also within a 20 MPH school speed zone. Arcadia SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 6 Avenue carries approximately 1,100 vehicles per day and Normandale Road carries approximately 2,100 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Most of the new traffic from the development will utilize Arcadia Road to access the Grandview Yard site. Grange Road and Willson Road Grange Road and Willson Road are two local minor collector roadways included in the study area; both facilities are 2-lane undivided roadways with speed limits of 30 MPH. Grange Road connects between W 50th Street and Eden Avenue, while Willson Road extends to the south as an eastern freeway frontage road. Willson Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route for the City of Edina and carries approximately 4,400 vehicles per day. Grange Road carries between 6,000 and 8,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Planned Improvements: Two mini roundabouts along Eden Avenue Based on the alternatives analysis completed in the East Grandview Transportation Study (2021), the intersection of Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road is programmed for improvements related to the redevelopment in the area and possible TIF funds. The existing all- way stop controlled intersection is skewed and has a large footprint that adds to driver confusion. The planned improvement project includes two mini roundabouts closely spaced together Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road. The design realigns Willson Road to connect directly across from the southern City Hall parking lot access, and Grange Road would be constructed as a separate T-intersection. Reference the East Grandview Transportation Study for a comprehensive traffic analysis of this configuration. Figure 4 – Mini Roundabouts Concept on Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 7 The following is a comprehensive list of all thirteen (16) intersections included in the full traffic analysis area; the main study intersections are also noted. 1. Vernon Ave/Gus Young Ln/Retail Access(1) Minor Stop Control 2. Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd(1) Traffic Signal(3) 3. Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave(1) Eastbound RIRO(2) 4. Vernon Ave at TH 100 SB Ramp(1) Traffic Signal(3) 5. Vernon Ave at TH 100 NB Ramp(1) Free Movements 6. W 50th Street at Eden Ave Minor Stop Control 7. Arcadia Ave at TH 100 SB Ramp connection Minor Stop Control 8. Arcadia Ave at Eden 100 Driveway/Proposed Restaurant Driveway(1) Minor Stop Control 9. Arcadia Ave at Proposed Senior Living Driveway(1) Minor Stop Control 10. Grange Road at TH 100 NB Ramp Minor Stop Control 11. Vernon Ave at Eden Ave(1) Traffic Signal 12. Vernon Ave at Brookside Ave Minor Stop Control 13. Eden Ave at School/Church/Proposed Senior Living Driveway(1) Minor Stop Control 14. Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd(1) Mini Roundabout(3) 15. Eden Ave at Grange Rd Mini Roundabout(3) 16. Eden Ave at Willson Rd Mini Roundabout(3) Notes: (1) Main Study Intersections (2) Right-In/Right-Out Intersection (3) Planned Improvements included in No Build scenario Figure 5 summarizes the no build 2024 traffic control at the study area intersections. Additional intersection figures can be found in Appendix B. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 8 Figure 5 – Existing Conditions SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 9 Vehicle Volumes To perform the operational analyses, the City provided vehicle turning movement data from recently completed studies within the study area, in addition to MnDOT count data and MnDOT ramp detector volume data. No new traffic data or observations were performed as part of this study. The East Grandview Transportation Study’s volume database from the Build scenario that included the existing and short-term planned transportation improvements were used as the no build 2024 volumes in this study. The foundation for most of this data included counts collected in 2019 and 2021 within the study area to ensure that most recent development traffic, such as the Avidor apartment complex, was included as much as possible in the analysis. Earlier turning movement count data was used, when necessary, for balancing purposes. With the study area having been thoroughly reviewed in recent years, an existing conditions analysis was not conducted. The study analyzed the anticipated year of opening 2024 traffic volumes, which will be discussed in the next section. 3 Planned Development The focus of this study is the planned development for the Grandview Yard area located at 5146 Eden Avenue, which is the location of the former public works site. The proposed full build out of the site includes: · 90-unit senior housing cooperative project, including 173 underground parking spaces · 2-story 13,500 square-foot, 347 seat restaurant, including 32 surface parking stalls and use of public parking ramp · 31,643 square-foot green space/public plaza, with connection to future pedestrian bridge (currently under construction) See Appendix A for a concept of the proposed Grandview Yard development. This study also included the confirmed land use sizes for the developments occurring at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 Building) and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site). Previous traffic studies have been completed in the Grandview area that included some differences in the number of proposed units and/or square footage. This analysis made the updates and revised the analysis appropriately – and ultimately, these differences made a nominal impact in the review. · 5100 Eden Ave: 138 housing units · 4917 Eden Ave: 196 housing units and 3,700 square-foot restaurant Trip generation traffic was added to the forecasted background traffic volumes for both the 2024 and 2042 forecast years. 4 Parking Demand Review Another component to this traffic study was to complete a parking demand review for the proposed Grandview Yard development. Parking requirements were reviewed using both City Code of Ordinances parking requirements and the ITE’s Parking Generation Manual. The SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 10 calculated parking demands were then compared to the planned parking stall layouts for the land uses to understand if the parking supply meets the expected demand during the peak period(s). Overall, the planned parking for Grandview Yard, which includes the spaces available in the nearby public parking ramp, will provide adequate number of spaces to accommodate the parking demands for the 347-seat restaurant and the 90-unit senior living co-op. There are no parking demands necessary for the proposed green space. Division 3, Subdivision II, Section 36-1311 of the City Code states: (c) Senior citizen dwelling unit buildings in the PSR-4 and PSR-5 subdistricts. (1) 0.5 exposed spaces and 0.25 enclosed spaces per senior citizen dwelling unit1. (2) In addition to subsection (c)(1) of this section, the following spaces are required: a. One completely enclosed and one exposed space for each nonsenior citizen dwelling unit located in a building in the Planned Senior Residence District; b. One completely enclosed space per vehicle owned by the building's management and stored on the property; and c. One exposed space for each employee who is not a resident of the building. (d) Restaurants (except within shopping centers). Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. Notes: 1 For this review, the City allowed enclosed spaces to replace the number of required exposed parking spaces for senior citizen housing. Senior Housing The proposed senior housing co-op will include a total of 90-units and 3 employees. The site includes an underground parking garage with 173 spaces. It is expected that these spaces will be used by residents, staff, and visitors of the complex. There are a small number (<10) of exposed parking spaces proposed for the site. The City Code requires a total of 71 parking spaces and the ITE Parking Generation Manual (ITE Code 252, Senior Adult Housing-Multifamily) requires a total of 55 spaces. Therefore, the parking needs for this development are met per the City Code and ITE. Restaurant The proposed restaurant will be approximately 13,400 SF, include 347 seats, and will staff approximately 50 employees during a peak shift. The site includes 32 surface parking spaces. The development expects that all staff members will utilize the public parking garage. Once the parking lot is full, patrons will either utilize the public parking garage or use the valet service (which will park near or in the public parking garage). The City Code requires a total of 166 parking spaces (115 spaces for patrons + 50 spaces for employees) and the ITE Parking Generation Manual (ITE Code 931, Quality Restaurant) requires a total of 180 spaces. Assuming SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 11 that all of the employees will utilize the public parking garage and patrons will utilize the public parking garage once the surface lot is full, a total of 134 parking spaces will be required during the peak period from the existing parking ramp. A Parking Study Update for Grandview Parking Ramp was recently completed in May 2022 for the public parking ramp and was referenced as part of this review. The study reviewed and summarized the existing parking ramp usage during the weekday and weekend late afternoon and evening time periods. The parking ramp has a total of 273 parking spaces, with 210 regular spaces and 63 3-hour restricted parking spaces. During the analysis periods, an average occupancy of 21.25% (215 unused spaces) was observed for the entire parking ramp during the weekday evening periods and an average occupancy of 21.0% (216 unused spaces) was observed for the entire parking ramp during the weekend late afternoon periods. Overall, these results conclude that a significant number of parking spaces are available during the late afternoon and evening time periods throughout the week. Based on the Grandview Parking Ramp study, there is an average of approximately 215 unused spaces in the parking garage during the weekday and weekend afternoon or early evening peak periods. Since these unused spaces exceed the required 134 parking garage spaces for the restaurant, the parking demands are met per the City Code and ITE. 5 Traffic Forecasting 5.1 Background Forecasting Future traffic forecasts were developed based on the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Plan and previous studies in the project area. Most roadways within the project area have a growth rate of between 0.2% and 0.5%. Based on the low growth rate and previous projects, including the East Grandview Transportation Study and the Eden Avenue Traffic Study, a growth rate of 0.3% per year was applied to all intersections in the study area. This growth rate was used to forecast the background traffic to the 2024 and 2042 future years. Intersection volume figures can be found in Appendix B. 5.2 Trip Generation – 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) A trip generation analysis was performed for the Grandview Yard development site based on the average rates provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The existing lot is currently vacant, and the proposed development includes a senior housing co-op, a dine-in restaurant, and a green space/public plaza. The land uses that were used for estimating the new trips include Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily (ITE Code 252) and Fine Dining Restaurant (ITE Code 931). All the trips are assumed to be new trips to the area. The Grandview Yard development also includes an approximately 0.73-acre green space. Due to the small area, there are no additional trips expected to be generated for the green space. It is assumed that trips to the park will be either be multi-use trips to other businesses in the area or will be accessed by a non-motor vehicle mode of transportation (i.e. walking, bicycling, or rolling). Due to the nature of these land uses and as a conservative approach, there were no pass-by trips or multi-use trip reductions applied to the trip generation estimates. The previously completed East Grandview District traffic study assumed that the land use at 5146 Eden Avenue was to include 165 residential apartment units. Using the previous 10th Edition for ITE Trip Generation Manual and the previous land use size assumption, the trip generation rates SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 12 estimated a total of 898 daily new trips, 59 AM peak hour new trips, and 73 PM peak hour new trips. Therefore, with this updated study, a total of 526 daily trips were added, 31 AM peak hour trips were removed, and 55 PM peak hour trips were added to the network compared to the previous East Grandview District study. Table 1 summarizes the previous and updated trip generations for each land use, including the estimated new daily and peak hour trips added to the roadway network. Table 1 – Trip Generation for 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) Site Address Land Use (ITE Code) Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Previous Land Use Size Assumption1 5146 Eden Ave (old Public Works Site) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 165 Units 898 59 73 Current Proposed Land Use Size2 5146 Eden Ave (old Public Works Site)3 Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily (252) 90 Units 292 18 23 Fine Dining Restaurant (931) 13,500 SF GFA 1,132 10 105 Total Trips 1,424 28 128 Total Trip Difference +526 -31 +55 Notes: 12021 East Grandview District Traffic Study (ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition) 2ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition 3 Proposed green space has no trip generation; therefore users are assumed multi-use trips 5.3 Trip Generation – Surrounding Developments Additionally, this study also confirmed the land use sizes for the redevelopment plans at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 Building) and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins Restaurant site). This study updated the trip generation for each site from previous studies to be included in the No Build traffic volumes. The Grandview East Transportation Study’s trip generation traffic for 5100 site used the same land use size that was confirmed by the City for this study (138 residential apartments); however, the earlier version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual was used. Table 2 summarizes the differences in the trip generation between the two ITE Trip Generation Manual editions. In general, the estimated trips were higher with the 10th edition compared to the 11th edition with a slight decrease in trips during the PM peak hour. Ultimately, the differences in trips during the AM and PM peak hour have nominal impact to the operations. Note that existing traffic generated by the Eden 100 offices were not extracted from the No Build traffic volumes; therefore, the traffic volumes provide a conservative analysis. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 13 Table 2 – Trip Generation for 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) Site Address Land Use (ITE Code) Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Previous Trip Generation1 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 138 Units 751 50 62 Current Proposed Trip Generation2 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 138 Units 627 51 54 Total Trip Difference -124 +1 -8 Notes: 12021 East Grandview District Traffic Study (ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition) 2ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition The 2021 Traffic and Parking Study for 5917 Eden Avenue’s trip generation used comparable land use sizes, with a small difference in the number of dwelling units (reduced from 208 to 196). The square footage for the fast-food restaurant remained the same at 3,700 SF. The ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition was also used in the previous study. Table 3 summarizes the differences in new trips using the previously assumed land use sizes and the updated land use sizes. Overall, a total of 144 net daily trips were added to the network and 65 net AM peak hour trips were added to the system. There was nominal change in the trip generation for the PM peak hour. Note that 2021 Traffic and Parking Study did not account for potential internal trip reduction between the land uses, which contributes to a more conservative traffic analysis. Ultimately, these trip differences were factored into the No Build volumes for this study. Table 3 – Trip Generation for 4917 Eden Ave (Old Perkins Restaurant) Site Address Land Use (ITE Code) Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Previous Land Use Size Assumption1 4917 Eden Ave (old Perkins site) Apartments 208 Units 1,132 75 92 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-thru 3,700 SF GFA 1,281 93 105 Total Trips 2,413 168 197 Updated Land Use Size2 4917 Eden Ave (old Perkins site) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 196 Units 890 73 76 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-thru (933) 3,700 SF GFA 1,667 160 123 Total Trips 2,557 233 199 Total Trip Difference +144 +65 -2 Notes: 12021 Traffic and Parking Study for 4917 Eden Avenue (ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition) 2ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 14 5.4 Trip Distribution The new trips were distributed to the intersections within the study area based on existing traffic data, proposed access locations, and logical transportation routes. The general trip distributions are the same or comparable to previously completed studies in the area, and are summarized below: · 15% to/from the west · 20% to/from the east · 30% to/from the south (via northbound TH 100) · 30% to/from the north (via southbound TH 100) · 5% to/from the south (via Normandale/W Frontage Road) 5.4.1 Restaurant Parking and Valet Distribution The proposed restaurant’s on-site parking lot will have 32 parking spaces, which are assumed to be used entirely by customers during the peak period. Employees are expected to utilize the Grandview Public Parking garage. Once the on-site spaces are full, customers will either use the valet service at the restaurant’s entrance/main parking lot or utilize the Grandview Public Parking lot. Valet parking is expected to use street parking on Brookside Avenue and/or the public parking garage. During the PM peak hour, 70 entering trips and 35 exiting trips are expected for the restaurant. New trips that are included in the valet service trips and the trips that enter the main lot before driving to the public parking garage were added to the network twice to account for this activity. Based on the expected parking activity distribution, the following activity is expected: · Restaurant Parking Lot - 32 trips (45%) assumed to enter the main lot until full - 17 trips (25%) assumed to enter the main lot to utilize the valet service or prior to driving to the public parking garage. · Grandview Public Parking Garage - 21 trips (30%) assumed to enter the public parking garage off Vernon Ave at either the Interlachen Blvd signal or at the at Gus Young Ln/Retail access. - Approximately 16 trips are expected to enter at Interlachen Blvd and 5 are expected to enter at the Gus Young/Retail access. - Trips assumed to enter the main lot prior to driving to the public parking garage are assumed to be small (~5 trips) and are expected to access the public parking garage via Arcadia Ave and Gus Young Lane. Grandview Public Parking entrance sign on Gus Young Boulevard. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 15 · Valet Parking/Brookside Avenue - 17 trips (25%) of new entering trips will utilize valet service or access the main lot before driving to the public parking garage. - Most of these trips are expected to utilize valet, which will likely access space on Brookside Avenue via Arcadia and Eden. The Build Traffic Volumes for the 2024 and 2042 analysis years are included in Appendix B. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis Traffic operations analyses were conducted to determine the level of service (LOS), delay, and queueing information for the AM and PM peak hour conditions for the no build and full build scenarios. LOS is a qualitative rating system used to describe the efficiency of traffic operations at an intersection. Six LOS are defined, designated by letters A through F. LOS A represents the best operating conditions (no congestion), and LOS F represents the worst operating conditions (severe congestion). For the study intersection it was assumed that a LOS D or better, for all approaches and the overall intersection, represents acceptable operating conditions. LOS for intersections is determined by the average control delay per vehicle. The range of control delay for each LOS is different for signalized and unsignalized intersections. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes and will experience greater delays than an unsignalized intersection; driver tolerance for delay is greater at a signal than at a stop sign. Therefore, the LOS thresholds for each LOS category are lower for unsignalized intersections than for signalized intersections Table 4 – Level of Service Thresholds Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection (Stop Control/Roundabout) A 0 to 10 0 to 10 B > 10 and ≤ 20 > 10 and ≤ 15 C > 20 and ≤ 35 > 15 and ≤ 25 D > 35 and ≤ 55 > 25 and ≤ 35 E > 55 and ≤ 80 > 35 and ≤ 50 F > 80 > 50 Operational analysis was conducted using Synchro/SimTraffic software (version 11) for all study intersections. The average of ten simulation runs were performed to determine the necessary measure of effectiveness (MOE’s). The East Grandview Transportation Study performed the roundabout analyses using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS7), which implements the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) calculations. The study found that operational results of the roundabouts were similar to SimTraffic results. Therefore, this study only utilized Synchro/SimTraffic software to analyze each intersection control option and does not include reports from HCS. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 16 Currently, there is not a standard traffic operations analysis tool to evaluate a mini roundabout; there are only guidelines for the expected operational capacity of the intersection. It should be noted that a mini roundabout would have slightly less capacity than any single-lane roundabout examined in this section. FHWA guidance suggests a total entering demand for a mini roundabout to be less than 1,600 vehicles per hour on all approaches, this threshold will be reviewed at each of the roundabout-controlled intersection. 6.1 Intersection Analysis The operations analysis summary will focus on the directly impacted study intersections, and the full analysis summary is included in Appendix C for all study intersections. 6.1.1 No Build Conditions The traffic operations analysis for the no build conditions includes the background traffic volumes and the existing or planned roadway/intersection conditions. 2024 No Build In the 2024 No Build scenario, the intersections will operate at LOS C or better with no major congestion. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 5. Most approaches are operating at a LOS C or better with some movements operating at LOS D, which is considered acceptable. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 875 vph to 1,165 vph. 2042 No Build Conditions In the 2042 No Build scenario, the intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better with no major congestion. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 6. Most approaches are operating at LOS C or better with some movements operating at LOS D, which is considered acceptable. An LOS E is seen for the northbound approach at Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave during the AM peak hour. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 920 vph to 1,220 vph. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 17 Table 5 – 2024 No Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 18.6 / B 20.6 / C 17.0 / B 17.2 / B WB 14.3 / B 16.7 / B NB 24.2 / C 18.5 / B SB 19.6 / B 14.9 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 16.1 / C 4.2 / A 21.7 / C 5.6 / A WB 15.7 / C 26.2 / D NB 3.5 / A 3.6 / A SB 2.2 / A 2.9 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 23.0 / C 22.9 / C 26.1 / C 30.1 / C WB 13.9 / B 21.0 / C NB 43.7 / D 50.8 / D SB 30.6 / C 44.9 / D Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 6.9 / A 5.5 / A 5.3 / A 4.7 / A WB 1.2 / A 1.2 / A NB 19.9 / C 20.7 / C SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 18.8 / B 22.7 / C 16.0 / B 25.7 / C WB 23.1 / C 27.7 / C NB SB 28.6 / C 36.4 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.6 / A 2.7 / A 2.5 / A 2.2 / A WB 2.8 / A 1.8 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.3 / A 5.2 / A 1.1 / A 1.3 / A WB 4.7 / A 0.7 / A NB 13.0 / B 10.3 / B SB 34.1 / D 8.7 / A Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.7 / A 3.8 / A 3.5 / A 3.4 / A WB 4.0 / A 2.8 / A NB 4.4 / A 4.4 / A SB 5.0 / A 3.4 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 0.0 / A 0.8 / A 0.0 / A 0.3 / A WB 6.8 / A 4.4 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.1 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.1 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 0.0 / A 0.5 / A 0.0 / A 0.4 / A WB 0.0 / A 0.0 / A NB 0.5 / A 0.6 / A SB 0.4 / A 0.3 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 18 Table 6 – 2042 No Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 16.1 / B 21.3 / C 19.2 / B 17.7 / B WB 13.9 / B 18.4 / B NB 25.0 / C 18.9 / B SB 20.7 / C 14.8 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 13.7 / B 4.5 / A 25.0 / D 6.7 / A WB 18.1 / C 33.9 / D NB 3.7 / A 4.1 / A SB 2.4 / A 3.0 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 25.9 / C 24.6 / C 30.4 / C 33.7 / C WB 15.7 / B 23.0 / C NB 41.4 / D 52.9 / D SB 31.7 / C 49.9 / D Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 9.1 / A 7.9 / A 6.5 / A 6.2 / A WB 1.2 / A 1.2 / A NB 36.9 / E 33.2 / D SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 20.0 / C 24.0 / C 17.0 / B 27.8 / C WB 25.0 / C 29.8 / C NB SB 29.1 / C 39.7 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.6 / A 3.4 / A 2.6 / A 2.4 / A WB 3.9 / A 2.1 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.4 / A 6.2 / A 1.6 / A 1.7 / A WB 5.3 / A 1.0 / A NB 16.4 / C 11.3 / B SB 17.1 / C 7.8 / A Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.9 / A 4.0 / A 3.7 / A 3.6 / A WB 3.9 / A 3.0 / A NB 4.7 / A 4.6 / A SB 6.0 / A 3.5 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 0.7 / A 0.4 / A WB 7.0 / A 4.3 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.2 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.1 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 0.5 / A 0.5 / A WB NB 0.5 / A 0.7 / A SB 0.4 / A 0.3 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 19 6.1.2 Build Conditions The traffic operations analysis for the build conditions includes the background traffic volumes and the new trips expected for the Grandview Yard development site. The existing or planned roadway conditions were continued to be used in the build analyses. 2024 Build Conditions In the 2024 Build scenario, the intersection operations are comparable to the 2024 No Build conditions with intersections operating at LOS C or better with no major congestion concerns. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 7. Most movements are operating at LOS C or better with some movements operating at LOS D, which is considered acceptable. The northbound movement at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection during the AM peak hour experiences slightly more delay compared to the No Build scenario, with approximately 8 seconds of delay per vehicle added due to the new trips for the redevelopment. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 895 vph to 1,200 vph. 2042 Build Conditions In the 2042 Build scenario, the intersection operations are relatively comparable to the 2042 No Build conditions with intersections operating at LOS C or better with the exception of the Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd intersection operating at LOS D during the PM peak hour. It is expected that routine signal timing adjustments can be made to alleviate these delay concerns in the future to achieve acceptable operations. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 8. Most movements are operating at LOS D or better. However, compared to the 2042 No Build operations, some movements are expected to experience slightly increased delay including the LOS E expected for the northbound and southbound approaches at Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd, LOS E in the AM peak hour for the northbound right-out movement at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave, and the westbound approach at the Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramp. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 940 vph to 1,255 vph. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 20 Table 7 – 2024 Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 20.9 / C 21.4 / C 17.6 / B 17.2 / B WB 14.1 / B 17.0 / B NB 25.0 / C 18.3 / B SB 21.0 / C 15.0 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 15.4 / C 4.5 / A 21.4 / C 5.6 / A WB 17.2 / C 26.8 / D NB 3.7 / A 3.6 / A SB 2.4 / A 2.8 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 23.3 / C 23.0 / C 26.8 / C 31.5 / C WB 14.1 / B 21.5 / C NB 40.3 / D 50.5 / D SB 31.0 / C 48.9 / D Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 9.1 / A 7.3 / A 6.3 / A 5.6 / A WB 1.1 / A 1.2 / A NB 28.6 / D 23.9 / C SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 20.3 / C 23.9 / C 16.9 / B 27.1 / C WB 24.8 / C 31.9 / C NB SB 28.8 / C 36.3 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.6 / A 2.8 / A 2.5 / A 2.4 / A WB 3.0 / A 2.3 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.4 / A 5.0 / A 1.3 / A 1.4 / A WB 4.5 / A 0.8 / A NB 12.1 / B 9.4 / A SB 19.2 / C 11.8 / B Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.8 / A 3.6 / A 3.5 / A 3.5 / A WB 3.6 / A 3.0 / A NB 4.5 / A 4.4 / A SB 4.8 / A 3.5 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 8.5 / A 0.8 / A 5.3 / A 0.9 / A WB 6.6 / A 5.4 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.5 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.2 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 7.3 / A 0.5 / A 11.7 / B 0.8 / A WB 0.0 / A 0.0 / A NB 0.5 / A 0.9 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.4 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 21 Table 8 – 2042 Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 26.0 / C 21.2 / C 15.9 / B 18.6 / B WB 14.6 / B 20.0 / C NB 24.5 / C 20.0 / C SB 20.4 / C 15.0 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 14.0 / B 4.9 / A 24.2 / C 6.9 / A WB 20.4 / C 30.9 / D NB 4.1 / A 4.6 / A SB 2.4 / A 3.5 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 26.7 / C 25.4 / C 33.1 / C 37.3 / D WB 15.9 / B 23.3 / C NB 40.1 / D 55.4 / E SB 33.1 / C 60.3 / E Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 10.0 / B 8.2 / A 8.1 / A 8.0 / A WB 1.2 / A 1.2 / A NB 32.2 / D 41.1 / E SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 21.0 / C 25.6 / C 18.9 / B 30.5 / C WB 28.8 / C 38.2 / D NB SB 28.7 / C 39.5 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.7 / A 3.8 / A 2.8 / A 3.0 / A WB 4.5 / A 3.2 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.5 / A 6.5 / A 1.5 / A 1.7 / A WB 4.9 / A 0.9 / A NB 18.8 / C 12.0 / B SB 20.4 / C 11.5 / B Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.9 / A 4.1 / A 3.7 / A 3.7 / A WB 4.4 / A 3.2 / A NB 4.7 / A 4.7 / A SB 5.2 / A 3.6 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 10.6 / B 0.8 / A 5.6 / A 0.9 / A WB 7.0 / A 5.4 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.4 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.3 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 9.6 / A 0.6 / A 8.4 / A 0.7 / A WB 0.0 / A 0.0 / A NB 0.5 / A 0.9 / A SB 0.4 / A 0.4 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 22 6.2 Travel Demand Management Policy Review The City of Edina approved a Travel Demand Management (TDM) Policy in April 2021 to help identify and manage negative traffic impact as a result of new development. The TDM policy outlines two tiers for TDM Plans that can be reviewed by the developer depending on the proposed land use and size. This traffic study does not specifically include a TDM Plan for the development. However, based on the operations analyses, the proposed site plan, and sketch plan proposal submitted to the Planning Commission in January 2022, the Grandview Yard development is expected to align with the City’s TDM goals in several ways, including: · The Grandview Yard development will connect directly with the pedestrian bridge currently under construction (anticipated 2022 completion) and achieve goals to accommodate multimodal and active transportation in the Grandview District. The pedestrian bridge will also span across the existing railroad tracks, which poses as an existing barrier in the District. · The proposed public green space/plaza proposes to include pedestrian routes, terrace seating, a sloped lawn, and public restrooms. The green space also allocates space for event space to host small community gatherings. This amenity will be an attractive land use to further support an active and vibrant community for the area. · The restaurant land use will rely on the existing public parking garage to accommodate the parking demand and eliminate some single-occupancy trips on Arcadia Avenue. According to the parking study and trip generation review, there is adequate parking capacity in the public garage to accommodate the parking demand. · The development is within close proximity to existing transit services on Vernon Avenue. · The Grandview Transportation Plan proposes sidewalks along the south and east lot lines. · The planned roundabout at Eden Avenue/Arcadia Avenue and improvements on Eden Avenue in the project area are expected to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and attract additional non-motorized users to the area. · The intersection operations analysis for the 2024 and 2042 Build scenarios do not show significant operational concerns due to the proposed development. Additional strategies that the development may consider to limit the number of single-occupancy vehicle trips and optimize the transportation network in the Grandview District include: · Designated rideshare drop-off areas and/or carpool parking spaces · Bicycle parking areas and accessible ramps · Discounted transit passes/transit benefits · Electric vehicle charging stations · Educate residents, employees, and customers on the benefits of carpooling and/or active transportation options, including maps of the surrounding bicycle networks and transit routes · Discourage trips into the restaurant parking area when the main lot is at capacity by additional signing and wayfinding to the public parking garage. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 23 7 Conclusions and Recommendations This study was intended to analyze the traffic operations of the proposed Grandview Yard development located at 5146 Eden Avenue (former Public Works site), which currently is vacant. The 3.125-acre parcel is located on the northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue and is proposed to include a 90-unit senior cooperative housing, a 2-story 13,500 square-foot restaurant, and an approximately 32,000 square-foot green space/public plaza. The purpose of the study was to identify any operational concerns due to the new traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. Traffic Study Summary: · The parking needs for the Senior Housing development are met as the proposed site includes a 173-space underground parking garage and the City code requires a total of 55 spaces. · The parking needs for the Restaurant development are met with consideration of the existing public parking ramp adjacent to the development. The City Code requires a total of 166 spaces and the restaurant will have access to 32 on-site parking spaces and the available Grandview public parking garage stalls, which provides an average of 215 unused spaces during peak periods (per the Grandview Parking Ramp study). · The proposed Grandview Yard development is expected to generate 1,424 weekday daily new trips, 28 AM peak hour new trips, and 128 PM peak hour new trips. · No Build operations were not significantly impacted by the new trips due to the relatively small number of new trips distributed to each intersection during the peak hours within the Grandview network. · The planned mini-roundabouts along Eden Avenue at Arcadia, Grange, and Willson are all expected to perform well with the 2024 and 2042 Build volumes. · Traffic operations for the 2024 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C and no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. All approaches operate acceptably at LOS D or better. · Traffic operations for the 2042 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C or better with no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. LOS E is expected for the NB approach at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave during the AM peak hour. · Traffic operations for the 2024 Build scenario are comparable to the 2024 No Build conditions. All intersections and movements operate at LSO D or better. Additional development traffic has nominal impact to operations. · Traffic operations for the 2042 Build scenario are comparable to the 2042 No Build conditions. The additional development traffic does add delays for a few approaches that reach LOS E during the peak hours, but overall, all intersections operate at a LOS D or better. Recommendations summary: · It is recommended that the Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection be monitored in the future to understand if there are any future operations or queueing concerns that should be addressed once development changes occur. · Signal timing adjustments and coordination along Vernon Avenue may be necessary to accommodate background traffic demand in addition to new development traffic. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 24 Specifically monitor signal timings at the Vernon Ave/SB TH 100 interchange ramp and Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd. · Consider spacing the two proposed driveways on Arcadia Avenue further apart to avoid turning conflicts or driver confusion. · Encourage public parking garage parking for the restaurant/discourage double trips onto the roadway network · Monitor valet parking activity and circulation to mitigate safety issues on Arcadia Ave during peak periods. Appendix A Grandview Yard Concept Plan Appendix B Intersection Volume Figures !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 Planned/Existing Lane Geometrics Figure1Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: bandertProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 7/28/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 ³>=³>P>PP>³Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 > W 50th St ³P³>³ = Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$=>P³>Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$OP=>OPèéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd>PP>>P>³P>³Vernon Ave 3 !"$= ³³³PèéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 >=O³³=³OGus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 ³>=³P>³O=O=!"$ !"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³³>=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 ³³=³³=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 OP>=!"$Arcadia Ave9 ³³!"$ Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)³>=³>=³>=³>=15 !"$City Hall16 Eden AveGrange RdEden Ave OP Willson RdP=>OOPOPOPOPOPOPO P!"$Grange Rd10 >==TH 100 Ramps ³=³>= Roundabout Control Intersection GeometricsOP !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Intersection IDX => !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2024 No Build Conditions Figure2Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 190 / (164)2 / (4)198 / (220)2 / (2)619 / (915)260 / (276)6 / (2)5 / (10)4 / (5)11 / (7)383 / (493)117 / (107)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 > 1372 / (867)181 / (119) 692 / (1336)4 / (8) W 50th St 0 / (0)192 / (237)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$=>³>3 / (4)372 / (355) 4 / (2)360 / (372)3 / (13)0 / (15)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 1 / (0)322 / (347)152 / (17)53 / (10)151 / (18)2 / (1)249 / (371)109 / (15)0 / (2)1 / (4)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 94 / (80)295 / (173)44 / (49)64 / (81)70 / (87)15 / (9)49 / (59)306 / (291)46 / (50)116 / (110)46 / (110)17 / (26)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 171 / (246)304 / (225)5 / (5)80 / (88)154 / (115)138 / (193)2 / (2)>=4 / (40)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd308 / (376)379 / (420)81 / (73)19 / (29)67 / (116)13 / (24)178 / (292)560 / (769)64 / (37)162 / (99)84 / (80)373 / (426)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 769 / (869)166 / (167)914 / (1180)32 / (39)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 61 / (65)4 / (12)52 / (73)13 / (9)720 / (1008)76 / (59)12 / (12)4 / (12)12 / (12)29 / (27)467 / (456)57 / (55)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 546 / (514)419 / (329) 697 / (896)383 / (450)223 / (355)66 / (63)366 / (655)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 585 / (335)965 / (843) 691 / (1247)372 / (304) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabout Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)139 / (70)41 / (52) 10 / (10)143 / (159)215 / (226) Eden Ave 5 / (22)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd104 / (168)249 / (177) 190 / (142)225 / (237) Eden Ave 241 / (155)142 / (158)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³16 / (25)51 / (19)117 / (228)³225 / (206)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)164 / (236)4 / (11)203 / (192)10 / (27)!"$Arcadia Ave9 179 / (246)213 / (219)!"$209 / (253)0 / (0)45 / (73)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=³³³=³> !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2042 No Build Conditions Figure3Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: bandertProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 200 / (171)2 / (4)208 / (231)2 / (2)653 / (964)273 / (290)6 / (2)5 / (11)4 / (5)12 / (7)404 / (520)123 / (113)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 1446 / (913)191 / (125) 727 / (1409)4 / (9) W 50th St 0 / (0)201 / (249)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$³>3 / (4)389 / (371) 4 / (2)380 / (390)3 / (14)0 / (16)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 1 / (0)336 / (362)161 / (18)56 / (11)159 / (19)2 / (1)263 / (389)115 / (16)0 / (2)1 / (4)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 98 / (83)309 / (180)47 / (52)67 / (85)74 / (91)16 / (10)52 / (54)322 / (305)49 / (53)122 / (115)49 / (116)16 / (28)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 180 / (259)319 / (235)5 / (5)84 / (91)161 / (120)143 / (202)2 / (2)>=4 / (43)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd325 / (396)400 / (443)85 / (77)20 / (31)70 / (122)14 / (26)187 / (307)590 / (809)67 / (39)171 / (104)89 / (85)393 / (448)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 810 / (916)174 / (174)963 / (1242)34 / (41)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 64 / (68)4 / (13)55 / (77)14 / (10)759 / (1062)80 / (62)13 / (13)4 / (13)13 / (13)31 / (29)492 / (481)60 / (58)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 575 / (542)439 / (344) 733 / (943)403 / (474)235 / (374)69 / (66)385 / (689)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 617 / (353)1014 / (886) 727 / (1313)391 / (319) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabout Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)146 / (74)44 / (55) 11 / (11)148 / (167)225 / (237) Eden Ave 5 / (23)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd109 / (177)259 / (185) 197 / (147)234 / (249) Eden Ave 252 / (160)150 / (166)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³17 / (27)54 / (20)122 / (240)³237 / (215)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)172 / (249)4 / (11)215 / (201)10 / (27)!"$Arcadia Ave9 187 / (259)225 / (228)!"$217 / (265)0 / (0)48 / (77)=>Driveway³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=³³³=³>> !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2024 Build Conditions Figure4Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 190 / (164)2 / (4)200 / (226)2 / (2)620 / (918)261 / (285)6 / (2)5 / (10)4 / (5)11 / (7)383 / (495)117 / (107)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 > 1373 / (871)182 / (132) 692 / (1338)4 / (8) W 50th St 0 / (0)194 / (246)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$=>³>3 / (22)374 / (361) 4 / (2)361 / (381)3 / (13)0 / (24)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 3 / (4)322 / (369)152 / (17)53 / (10)151 / (18)3 / (3)249 / (387)109 / (15)2 / (4)4 / (6)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 96 / (108)297 / (177)44 / (49)64 / (81)70 / (91)15 / (9)49 / (68)308 / (293)47 / (50)116 / (132)46 / (112)17 / (31)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 173 / (252)307 / (244)5 / (5)80 / (88)154 / (115)138 / (193)2 / (2)>=4 / (40)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd309 / (376)379 / (420)86 / (89)19 / (29)67 / (116)13 / (33)178 / (292)560 / (769)64 / (37)162 / (99)84 / (80)373 / (426)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 774 / (885)175 / (188)914 / (1189)32 / (39)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 61 / (65)4 / (12)52 / (75)13 / (9)720 / (1008)77 / (62)12 / (12)4 / (12)12 / (12)29 / (27)467 / (456)57 / (55)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 549 / (524)419 / (329) 706 / (926)383 / (450)225 / (361)69 / (82)366 / (655)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 585 / (335)968 / (853) 691 / (1249)381 / (332) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabout Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)140 / (83)41 / (52) 10 / (10)144 / (166)215 / (226) Eden Ave 5 / (22)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd104 / (168)250 / (190) 190 / (142)227 / (244) Eden Ave 244 / (174)142 / (158)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³16 / (25)54 / (38)117 / (229)³234 / (228)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)1 / (15)166 / (241)4 / (11)1 / (43)210 / (199)10 / (27)!"$Senior Housing Access Arcadia Ave9 7 / (6)0 / (0)2 / (4)179 / (275)1 / (4)214 / (263)!"$209 / (253)0 / (0)45 / (73)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=>=³>³=³=³>=>Restaurant Access Senior Housing Access !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2042 Build Conditions Figure5Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 200 / (171)2 / (4)210 / (237)2 / (2)654 / (967)274 / (299)6 / (2)5 / (11)4 / (5)12 / (7)404 / (522)123 / (113)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 1447 / (917)192 / (138) 727 / (1411)4 / (9) W 50th St 0 / (0)203 / (258)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$³>3 / (22)391 / (377) 4 / (2)381 / (399)3 / (14)0 / (25)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 3 / (4)336 / (384)161 / (18)56 / (11)159 / (19)3 / (3)263 / (405)115 / (16)2 / (4)4 / (6)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 100 / (111)311 / (184)47 / (52)67 / (85)74 / (95)16 / (10)52 / (70)324 / (307)50 / (53)122 / (137)49 / (118)16 / (33)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 182 / (265)322 / (254)5 / (5)84 / (91)161 / (120)143 / (202)2 / (2)>=4 / (43)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd325 / (396)400 / (443)90 / (93)20 / (31)70 / (122)14 / (35)187 / (307)590 / (809)67 / (39)171 / (104)89 / (85)393 / (448)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 815 / (932)183 / (195)963 / (1251)34 / (41)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 64 / (68)4 / (13)55 / (79)14 / (10)759 / (1062)81 / (65)13 / (13)4 / (13)13 / (13)31 / (29)492 / (481)60 / (58)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 578 / (552)439 / (344) 742 / (973)403 / (474)237 / (380)72 / (85)385 / (689)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 617 / (353)1017 / (896) 727 / (1315)400 / (347) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabout Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)147 / (87)44 / (55) 11 / (11)150 / (174)225 / (237) Eden Ave 5 / (23)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd109 / (177)260 / (198) 197 / (147)236 / (256) Eden Ave 255 / (179)150 / (166)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³17 / (27)57 / (39)122 / (241)³246 / (237)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)1 / (15)174 / (254)4 / (11)1 / (43)222 / (208)10 / (27)!"$Senior Housing Access Arcadia Ave9 7 / (6)0 / (0)2 / (4)187 / (288)1 / (4)226 / (272)!"$217 / (265)0 / (0)48 / (77)=>³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=>=³>³=³= > >³>=³>=2 / (15)0 / (0)0 / (28) Restaurant Access Senior Housing Access Appendix C Traffic Operational Results Table B1Grandview Yard2024 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 21.6 C 22.2 C 5.6 A 18.6 B50 20 3700356 20 3900 000WB 198 2 192 392 19.9 B 13.6 B 8.3 A 14.3 B 20.6 C 100 8214701 % 635 67 21900 000NB 2 619 260 881 62.1E31.4 C 6.4 A 24.2 C100 20 41022 % 379 1863232 %0250 61220SB 117 383 11 511 28.2 C 17.4 B 13.1 B 19.6 B 145 6415401 % 792 89 171 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 21.7 C 25.9 D 5.4 A 16.1 C00000204 20 49 1 %050 20 31WB 52 4 61 117 22.0 C 24.3 C 10.3 B 15.7 C 4.2 A00000418 34 86 6 % 3 % 50 3186NB 13 720 76 809 7.0 A 3.4 A 3.7 A 3.5 A 100 20 2700792 20 2100140 20 20SB 57 467 29 553 10.3 B 1.3 A 1.3 A 2.2 A 100 20 720038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 560 64 802 37.9 D 18.9 B 17.7 B 23.0 C 150 10722001 % 382 1883821 %0000WB 81 379 309 769 27.6 C 13.3 B 11.4 B 13.9 B 22.9 C 200 46 12700390 110 25700 000NB 19 67 13 99 51.2 D 44.2 D 30.1 C 43.7 D 50 2086023 % 438 60 14000 000SB 373 84 162 619 37.1 D 29.5 C 16.2 B 30.6 C 590 185 34901 %0111 24800 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0914 32 9460.0 07.0 A 4.4 A 6.9 A00003 % 390 85 324 13 %0000WB076907690.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 5.5 A00000 00000000NB00166 1660.0 019.9 C 19.9 C00000 00000295 67 179SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0697 383 1,0800.0 023.6 C 10.1 B 18.8 B00000152159 204007582 177WB 419 5460965 35.3 D 13.6 B0.0 023.1 C 22.7 C00000378 27548500 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 366 66 223 655 38.1 D 38.9 D 10.4 B 28.6 C500 115 227001106 167 26300300 58 13950th St & NB TH 100EB0691 372 1,0630.0 01.6 A 4.4 A 2.6 A00000 00000 000WB0965 585 1,5500.0 01.9 A 4.2 A 2.8 A 2.7 A00000171 20 6802 % 252350NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 0000000050th St & Eden AveEB0692 4 6960.0 00.6 A 0.5 A 0.6 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 181 137201,553 6.9 A 0.7 A0.0 01.4 A 1.6 A 120 481080032702000 000NB00192 1920.0 00.3 A 7.4 A 7.2 A00000242 48 12400 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 4 3600364 3.7 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A100 20 280063502000 000WB0372 3 3750.0 00.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 03.1 A 3.1 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 2 249 109 360 4.8 A 1.6 A 0.5 A 1.3 A00000140 20 6900 000WB 152 322 1 475 7.7 A 3.4 A 0.1 A 4.7 A 5.2 A00000676412800000NB 530151 204 30.6 D0.0 06.7 A 13.0 B320 31 12000 00000100 33111SB 1001 34.1 D0.0 0 0.0 034.1 D00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 49 306 46 401 2.0 A 3.0 A 1.8 A 2.7 A0000067 277500 000WB 44 295 94 433 3.0 A 4.2 A 3.5 A 4.0 A 3.8 A0000082 4413400 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 64 70 15 149 3.9 A 5.0 A 3.9 A 4.4 A00000642 27 7700 000SB 17 46 116 179 3.7 A 5.1 A 5.1 A 5.0 A00000156 36 10400 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 51016 67 6.4 A0.0 01.4 A 5.1 A 1.0 A 340 27 6700 00000 000NB022502250.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 6800 000SB011701170.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A0000058802000000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 15022 37 7.0 A0.0 06.6 A 6.8 A 0.8 A00000235 23 5300 000NB0203 10 2130.0 00.1 A 0.0 A 0.1 A00000200000000SB 4 1640168 1.6 A 0.3 A0.0 00.3 A000002020 3300 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB021302130.0 00.5 A0.0 00.5 A0000015602000 000SB017901790.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A000002002000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 190 2250415 3.6 A 4.8 A0.0 04.2 A00000700 34 11100 000WB0249 104 3530.0 02.8 A 5.0 A 3.4 A 3.6 A0000079 4712200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1420241 383 3.2 A 1.7 A 3.4 A 3.2 A0000080 3912800 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 142 215 367 1.1 A 1.6 A 1.2 A 1.4 A0000079 20 6300 000WB 41 139 5 185 2.9 A 4.3 A 3.1 A 4.0 A 2.4 A0000031423 9000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 209045 254 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000432 25 8400 000SB 505 10 3.0 A 0.3 A 2.8 A 0.8 A00000349 20 2800 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 1710304 475 11.2 B0.0 02.6 A 5.6 A320 55 11900 00000200 20 98WB00440.0 0 0.0 04.8 A 4.8 A 3.5 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 154 138 2 294 2.1 A 1.1 A 1.9 A 1.5 A0000080 249400 000SB080 5 850.0 00.4 A 0.4 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2000 000AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s) Grandview Yard2024 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 10 5 17 19.0 B 22.9 C 5.5 A 17.0 B50 20 2001 % 356 20 5200 000WB 220 4 164 388 22.1 C 14.2 B 10.2 B 16.7 B 17.2 B 1008714801 % 635 69 23000 000NB 2 915 276 1,193 43.5 D 22.3 C 5.7 A 18.5 B100 20 21026 % 379 1923482 %0250 66268SB 107 493 7 607 25.5 C 12.9 B 10.3 B 14.9 B145 5414100792 84 17100 000Vernon Ave at Gus Young LnEB 12 12 12 36 31.8 D 29.4 D 5.7 A 21.7 C00000204 20 54 2 %050 20 32WB 73 12 65 150 35.3E36.1E14.4 B 26.2 D 5.6 A00000418 58 162 20 % 4 % 50 3999NB 9 1008 59 1,076 6.4 A 3.6 A 3.6 A 3.6 A100 20 2000792 20 2700140020SB 55 456 27 538 14.4 B 1.7 A 1.7 A 2.9 A100 25 750038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 292 769 37 1,098 45.1 D 19.3 B 20.3 C 26.1 C150168 22903 % 382 2033773 %0000WB 73 420 376 869 35.3 D 20.5 C 18.9 B 21.0 C 30.1 C 200 52 11600390 167 31500 000NB 29 116 24 169 60.3E51.0 D 38.8 D 50.8 D50 33100044 % 438 108 24500 000SB 426 80 99 605 52.1 D 36.3 D 20.5 C 44.9 D590 236 484 2 % 1 %0125 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia AveEB01180 39 1,2190.0 05.4 A 3.7 A 5.3 A00002 % 390 70 293 8 %0000WB086908690.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2A 4.7 A00000 00000 000NB00167 1670.0 020.7 C 20.7 C00000 00000295 71 169SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0896 450 1,3460.0 019.8 B 8.3 A 16.0 B00000152159 213007579 187WB 329 5140843 44.1 D 17.1 B0.0 027.7 C 25.7 C00000378 25344900 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 655 63 355 1,073 46.5 D 54.8 D 15.2 B 36.4 D500 225 393001106 273 458 6 %0300 11137050th St & NB TH 100 EB01247 304 1,5510.0 02.0 A 4.5 A 2.5 A00000 00000 000WB0843 335 1,1780.0 01.5 A 2.4 A 1.8 A 2.2 A00000171 20 530025 2036NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden AveEB01336 8 1,3440.0 00.9 A 0.7 A 0.9 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 119 8670986 18.2 C 0.4 A0.0 02.7 A 4.7 A 120 5713400327 20 5200 000NB00237 2370.0 02.1 A 35.1E33.7 D00000242 11127400 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 2 3720374 4.2 A 0.8 A0.0 00.8 A100 20 2000 00000 000WB0355 4 3590.0 00.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.7 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 15013 28 9.1 A0.0 03.4 A 6.6 A00000345 20 4100 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 1 371 15 387 3.4 A 1.1 A 0.2 A 1.1 A00000140 20 5500 000WB 17 3470364 4.2 A 0.6 A0.000.7 A 1.3 A0000067 207300 000NB 10018 28 13.9 B0.0 08.5 A 10.3 B320 20 3200 00000100 20 41SB 402 6 12.1 B0.0 03.5 A 8.7 A00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 52 291 50 393 2.8 A 3.7 A 2.7 A 3.5 A0000067 317000 000WB 49 173 80 302 2.6 A 3.0 A 2.6 A 2.8 A 3.4 A0000082 287300 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 81 87 9 177 4.0 A 4.8 A 4.1 A 4.4 A00000642 26 7800 000SB 26 110 110 246 3.4 A 3.4 A 3.3 A 3.4 A00000156 31 9700 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 19025 44 6.4 A0.0 01.2 A 3.3 A 0.5 A 340 20 5000 00000 000NB020602060.0 00.1 A0.0 00.1 A000002020 5600 000SB022802280.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3A0000058802000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 10014 24 6.2 A0.0 03.3 A 4.4 A 0.3 A00000235 20 3800 000NB0192 27 2190.0 00.1 A 0.0 A 0.1 A000002002000 000SB 11 2360247 1.2 A 0.1 A0.0 00.1 A000002020 3600 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.4 A00000 00000 000NB021902190.0 00.6 A0.0 00.6 A00000 00000 000SB024602460.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A000001902000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 142 2370379 4.4 A 5.3 A0.0 05.0 A00000700 31 11000 000WB0177 168 3450.0 02.2 A 2.2 A 2.2 A 3.2 A0000079 309000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1580155 313 2.5 A 1.1 A 2.4 A 2.4 A0000080 208300 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 159 226 395 1.9 A 1.9 A 1.7 A 1.8 A0000079 20 6400 000WB 52 70 5 127 3.3 A 4.0 A 3.0 A 3.7 A 2.8 A0000031420 7300 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 253073 326 3.8 A0.0 03.6 A 3.8 A00000432 31 9600 000SB 5022 27 3.3 A0.0 03.0 A 3.0 A00000349 20 3500 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 2460225 471 21.9 C0.0 03.5 A 13.0 B320 92 24000 00000200 20 150WB0040 400.0 0 0.0 06.5 A 6.5 A 7.5 A00000159 21 5500 000NB 115 193 2 310 2.7 A 2.0 A 1.0 A 2.2 A0000080 2711600 000SB088 5 930.0 00.4 A 0.3 A 0.4 A0000018002000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B2Grandview Yard2024 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 29.6 C 24.3 C 5.9 A 20.9 C50 20 3500356 20 4100 000WB 200 2 192 394 19.9 B 15.5 B 8.2 A 14.1 B 21.4 C 100 7914701 % 635 63 21200 000NB 2 620 261 883 61.2E32.6 C 6.4 A 25.0 C 100 20 78022 % 379 1873503 %0250 65269SB 117 383 11 511 29.1 C 18.8 B 15.2 B 21.0 C 145 6414401 % 792 94 195 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 22.7 C 26.8 D 4.7 A 15.4 C00000204 20 47 1 %050 20 31WB 52 4 61 117 23.5 C 26.3 D 11.5 B 17.2 C 4.5 A00000418 37 114 7 % 3 % 50 3083NB 13 720 77 810 5.9 A 3.6 A 3.9 A 3.7 A 100 20 2500792 20 5200140020SB 57 467 29 553 10.8 B 1.4 A 1.2 A 2.4 A 100 23 7600 00000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 560 64 802 34.9 C 20.4 C 17.9 B 23.3 C 150 9920601 % 382 1923811 %0000WB 86 379 309 774 28.1 C 13.4 B 11.2 B 14.1 B 23.0 C 200 49 12200390 108 24700 000NB 19 67 13 99 44.5 D 41.7 D 27.0 C 40.3 D 50 2179023 % 438 58 12800 000SB 373 84 162 619 37.4 D 29.1 C 17.1 B 31.0 C 590 185 36801 %0116 26500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0914 32 9460.0 09.2 A 6.8 A 9.1 A00005 % 390 11734918 %0000WB077407740.0 01.1 A0.0 01.1 A 7.3 A0000000000 000NB00175 1750.0 028.6 D 28.6 D00000 00000295 78 222SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0706 383 1,0890.0 025.5 C 10.8 B 20.3 C00000152166 207007580 177WB 419 5490968 38.0 D 14.6 B0.0 024.8 C 23.9 C00000378 28749000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 366 69 225 660 37.9 D 40.4 D 10.2 B 28.8 C500 122 243001106 171 27400300 54 12450th St & NB TH 100EB0691 381 1,0720.0 01.6 A 4.4 A 2.6 A00000 00000 000WB0968 585 1,5530.0 02.2 A 4.3 A 3.0 A 2.8 A00000171 20 12202 % 252250NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A0000000000 00050th St & Eden AveEB0692 4 6960.0 00.6 A 0.4 A 0.6 A0000034202000 000WB 182 137301,555 7.3 A 0.7 A0.0 01.5 A 1.7 A 120 481070032702000 000NB00194 1940.0 00.4 A 7.2 A 7.0 A00000242 47 11100 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 4 3610365 3.8 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A1000200063502000 000WB0374 3 3770.0 00.7 A 0.6 A 0.7 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 03.0 A 3.0 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 3 249 109 361 4.7 A 1.7 A 0.6 A 1.4 A00000140 20 8100 000WB 152 322 3 477 7.8 A 3.0 A 0.7 A 4.5 A 5.0 A00000676012500000NB 530151 204 28.1 D0.0 06.9 A 12.1 B320 29 11000 00001 % 100 33110SB 402 6 25.5 D0.0 06.6 A 19.2 C00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 49 308 47 404 2.0 A 3.0 A 1.9 A 2.8 A0000067 267700 000WB 44 297 96 437 3.1 A 3.8 A 3.1 A 3.6 A 3.6 A0000082 4411600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 64 70 15 149 4.0 A 5.2 A 3.7 A 4.5 A00000642 28 7000 000SB 17 46 116 179 4.6 A 4.9 A 4.7 A 4.8 A00000156 36 10300 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 54016 70 6.3 A0.0 01.3 A 4.9 A 1.0 A 340 26 6100 00000 000NB023402340.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB011701170.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2A0000058802000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 2002 8.5 A0.0 0 0.0 08.5 A00000261 20 3100 000WB 15022 37 6.7 A0.0 06.5 A 6.6 A 0.8 A00000235 21 4700 000NB 1 210 10 221 1.3 A 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A00000 00000 000SB 4 166 1 171 1.5 A 0.3 A 0.3 A 0.3 A000002020 2500 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 7007 7.3 A0.0 0 0.0 07.3 A00000268 20 3100 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB 1 2140215 2.3 A 0.5 A0.0 00.5 A0000015602000 000SB0179 2 1810.0 00.3 A 0.4 A 0.3 A00000200000000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 190 2270417 3.7 A 5.2 A0.0 04.5 A00000700 37 12500 000WB0250 104 3540.0 02.7 A 4.7 A 3.2 A 3.6 A0000079 4712200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1420244 386 3.3 A 1.5 A 3.2 A 3.1 A0000080 3510900 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 144 215 369 1.2 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 1.4 A0000079 20 6200 000WB 41 140 5 186 3.1 A 4.2 A 2.5 A 3.9 A 2.3 A00000314 24 8000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 209045254 3.0 A0.0 03.1 A 3.0 A00000432 24 8100 000SB 505 10 3.4 A 0.2 A 2.6 A 0.7 A00000349 20 2800 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 1730307 480 12.2 B0.0 02.5 A 6.0 A320 58 13200 00000200 20 83WB00440.0 0 0.0 04.1 A 4.1 A 3.7 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 154 138 2 294 2.1 A 1.1 A 0.2 A 1.5 A0000080 218600 000SB080 5 850.0 00.4 A 0.7 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2000 000AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s) Grandview Yard2024 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 10 5 17 19.9 B 23.5 C 6.6 A 17.6 B50 20 2701 % 356 20 5500 000WB 226 4 164 394 22.1 C 16.2 B 10.3 B 17.0 B 17.2 B 1009214901 % 635 73 25400 000NB 2 918 285 1,205 34.5 C 22.1 C 5.6 A 18.3 B100 20 41026 % 379 188 317 1 %0250 56 146SB 107 495 7 609 24.7 C 13.1 B 8.8 A 15.0 B145 5613401 % 792 89 198 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young LnEB 12 12 12 36 25.9 D 30.8 D 5.7 A 21.4 C00000204 21 63 3 %050 20 31WB 75 12 65 152 33.5 D 38.2E15.6 C 26.8 D 5.6 A00000418 56 163 21 % 3 % 50 3697NB 9 1008 62 1,079 7.0 A 3.6 A 3.4 A 3.6 A100 20 2400792 20 3500140020SB 55 456 27 538 13.7 B 1.7 A 1.5 A 2.8 A100 24 730038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 292 769 37 1,098 46.3 D 19.7 B 18.8 B 26.8 C150169 23004 % 382 2053824 %0000WB 89 420 376 885 36.2 D 20.3 C 19.2 B 21.5 C 31.5 C 200 62 14200390 16234800 000NB 29 116 33 178 60.3E51.1 D 41.3 D 50.5 D50 26100043 % 438 109 26500 000SB 426 80 99 605 56.6E37.9 D 24.3 C 48.9 D590 2595623 % 1 %0134 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia AveEB01189 39 1,2280.0 06.3 A 4.8 A 6.3 A00003 % 390 90 316 10 %0000WB088508850.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2A 5.6 A00000 00000 000NB00188 1880.0 023.9 C 23.9 C00000 00000295 85 190SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0926 450 1,3760.0 020.6 C 9.1 A 16.9 B00000152166 212007581 180WB 329 5240853 51.2 D 19.6 B0.0 031.9 C 27.1 C00000378 27748900 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 655 82 361 1,098 45.9 D 53.8 D 15.3 B 36.3 D500 230 391001106 273 456 6 %0300 10932250th St & NB TH 100 EB01249 332 1,5810.0 02.0 A 4.6 A 2.5 A00000 00000 000WB0853 335 1,1880.0 02.2 A 2.4 A 2.3 A 2.4 A00000171 20 720025 2043NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden AveEB01338 8 1,3460.0 00.9 A 0.7 A 0.9 A0000034202000 000WB 132 87101,003 17.3 C 0.4 A0.0 02.6 A 5.8 A 120 5713000 00000 000NB00246 2460.0 01.9 A 46.7E44.9E00000242 13229000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 2 3810383 3.1 A 0.9 A0.0 00.9 A10002000 00000 000WB0361 22 3830.0 00.3 A 0.2 A 0.3 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 24013 37 9.2 A0.0 03.7 A 7.3 A00000345 20 4900 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 3 387 15 405 6.5 A 1.3 A 0.2 A 1.3 A00000140 20 7600000WB 17 369 4 390 3.9 A 0.7 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 1.4 A0000067 207200 000NB 10018 28 11.4 B0.0 08.6 A 9.4 A320 20 2600 00000100 20 36SB 604 10 15.5 C0.0 03.1 A 11.8 B00000239 20 2400 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 68 293 50 411 2.9 A 3.8 A 2.9 A 3.5 A0000067 337500 000WB 49 177 108 334 2.8 A 3.1 A 2.8 A 3.0 A 3.5 A0000082 308800 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 81 91 9 181 4.0 A 4.8 A 3.9 A 4.4 A00000642 28 7300 000SB 31 112 132 275 3.4 A 3.6 A 3.5 A 3.5 A00000156 36 10400 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 38025 63 7.0 A0.0 01.4 A 4.7 A 0.8 A 340 20 5900 00000 000NB022802280.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB022902290.0 00.4 A0.000.4 A00000588 20 2400 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 15028 43 7.6 A0.0 04.0 A 5.3 A00000261 25 5800 000WB 10014 24 7.9 A0.0 03.7 A 5.4 A 0.9 A00000235 20 4000 000NB 43 199 27 269 1.6 A 0.3 A 0.0 A 0.5 A000002020 3400 000SB 11 241 15 267 1.6 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A000002020 4500 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 6006 11.7 B0.0 0 0.0 011.7 B00000268 20 3100 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.8 A00000 00000 000NB 4 2630267 2.3 A 0.9 A0.0 00.9 A00000156 20 4000 000SB0275 4 2790.0 00.4 A 0.1 A 0.4 A000002020 2000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 142 2440386 4.7 A 5.8 A0.0 05.4 A00000700 35 13000 000WB0190 168 3580.0 02.3 A 2.3 A 2.3 A 3.5 A0000079 319200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1580174 332 3.0 A 1.3 A 2.9 A 2.9 A0000080 2811100 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 166 226 402 2.6 A 2.4 A 2.0 A 2.2 A0000079 208500 000WB 52 83 5 140 3.4 A 4.0 A 3.5 A 3.8 A 3.8 A00000314 20 6800 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 253073326 5.9 A0.0 06.1 A 5.9 A00000432 36 13000 000SB 5022 27 2.8 A0.0 03.3 A 3.2 A00000349 20 3300 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 2520244 496 27.0 D0.0 03.9 A 15.4 C320 10527200 00000200 27181WB0040 400.0 0 0.0 07.3 A 7.3 A 8.9 A00000159 21 6200 000NB 115 193 2 310 2.7 A 2.0 A 5.7 A 2.2 A0000080 2710000 000SB088 5 930.0 00.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 A0000018002000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B3Grandview Yard2042 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 24.8 C 20.5 C 3.0 A 16.1 B50 20 3100356 20 3500 000WB 208 2 200 410 19.3 B 20.0 C 8.5 A 13.9 B 21.3 C 100 7714301 % 635 63 21700 000NB 2 653 273 928 65.7E32.3 C 6.3 A 25.0 C100 20 26026 % 379 1923493 %0250 69248SB 123 404 12 539 29.3 C 18.4 B 17.3 B 20.7 C 145 6815501 % 792 99 209 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 13 4 13 30 21.3 C 17.1 C 5.3 A 13.7 B00000204 20 460050 20 37WB 55 4 64 123 25.1 D 26.6 D 11.3 B 18.1 C 4.5 A00000418 38 93 9 % 3 % 50 3086NB 14 759 80 853 6.2 A 3.6 A 3.9 A 3.7 A 100 20 2300792 20 7300140020SB 60 492 31 583 11.1 B 1.4 A 1.4 A 2.4 A 100 23 750038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 187 590 67 844 39.2 D 22.2 C 20.4 C 25.9 C 150 11422602 % 382 2043862 %0000WB 85 400 325 810 30.6 C 14.5 B 13.3 B 15.7 B 24.6 C 200 53 14100390 122 25900 000NB 20 70 14 104 41.9 D 43.9 D 25.5 C 41.4 D 50 2067025 % 438 61 14300 000SB 393 89 171 653 39.2 D 29.1 C 16.6 B 31.7 C 590 195 404 1 % 1 %0123 27400 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0963 34 9970.0 09.2 A 6.6 A 9.1 A00005 % 390 11536216 %0000WB081008100.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 7.9 A0000000000 000NB00174 1740.0 036.9E36.9E00000 00000295 91256SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0733 403 1,1360.0 024.8 C 11.2 B 20.0 C00000152163 208007588 181WB 439 57501,014 38.9 D 14.7 B0.0 025.0 C 24.0 C00000378 28947200 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 385 69 235 689 38.0 D 41.9 D 10.5 B 29.1 C500 121 262001106 173 30200300 56 14250th St & NB TH 100EB0727 391 1,1180.0 01.6 A 4.5 A 2.6 A00000 00000 000WB01014 617 1,6310.0 03.2 A 5.0 A 3.9 A 3.4 A00000171 20 12602 % 2528 51NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden AveEB0727 4 7310.0 00.6 A 0.4 A 0.6 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 191 144601,637 7.4 A 0.7 A0.0 01.5 A 1.7 A 120 501180032702000 000NB00201 2010.0 00.3 A 7.4 A 7.2 A00000242 48 11800 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 4 3800384 4.7 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A100 20 2500635 20 2000 000WB0389 3 3920.0 00.8 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 03.6 A 3.6 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 2 263 115 380 5.0 A 1.7 A 0.7 A 1.4 A00000140 20 8000 000WB 161 336 1 498 8.4 A 3.7 A 1.4 A 5.3 A 6.2 A00000676913200 000NB 560159 215 41.3E0.0 07.8 A 16.4 C320 37 14800 00001 % 100 36135SB 1001 17.1 C0.0 0 0.0 017.1 C0000023902000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 52 322 49 423 2.1 A 3.1 A 2.2 A 2.9 A0000067 317900 000WB 47 309 98 454 3.2 A 4.1 A 3.3 A 3.9 A 4.0 A0000082 4512900 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 74 16 157 4.1 A 5.3 A 4.1 A 4.7 A00000642 29 8000 000SB 16 49 122 187 5.5 A 5.7 A 6.2 A 6.0 A00000156 41 12100 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 54017 71 7.2 A0.0 01.3 A 5.7 A 1.2 A 340 27 6400 00000 000NB023702370.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 6200 000SB012201220.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A0000058802000000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 15022 37 7.5 A0.0 06.7 A 7.0 A 0.7 A00000235 23 3900 000NB0215 10 2250.0 00.1 A 0.0 A 0.1 A000002002000 000SB 4 1720176 1.8 A 0.3 A0.0 00.3 A000002020 3000 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB022502250.0 00.5 A0.0 00.5 A00000 00000 000SB018701870.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A000002020 2000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 197 2340431 3.7 A 5.1 A0.0 04.5 A00000700 36 10000 000WB0259 109 3680.0 02.8 A 4.5 A 3.2 A 3.7 A0000079 4512200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1500252 402 3.8 A 1.7 A 3.4 A 3.4 A0000080 4613600 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 148 225 384 1.3 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 1.4 A0000079 20 6300 000WB 44 146 5 195 3.2 A 4.4 A 3.0 A 4.1 A 2.4 A0000031426 7800 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 217048 265 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000432 26 8900 000SB 505 10 4.1 A 0.3 A 3.5 A 0.8 A00000349 20 3300 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 1800319 499 12.5 B0.0 02.6 A 6.2 A320 60 14000 00000200 20 95WB00440.0 0 0.0 04.3 A 4.3 A 3.9 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 161 143 2 306 2.0 A 1.2 A 0.3 A 1.5 A0000080 218200 000SB084 5 890.0 00.4 A 0.4 A 0.4 A0000018002000 000Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s)AM Peak Hour Grandview Yard2042 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 36.1 D 22.4 C 5.5 A 19.2 B50 20 2901 % 356 20 5800 000WB 231 4 171 406 24.3 C 15.8 B 10.6 B 18.4 B 17.7 B 1009514901 % 635 78 28200 000NB 2 964 290 1,256 33.9 C 22.9 C 6.3 A 18.9 B100 20 38028 % 379 1963592 %0250 66248SB 113 520 7 640 25.0 C 12.9 B 8.1 A 14.8 B145 5714101 % 792 90 198 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young LnEB 13 13 13 39 33.0 D 34.8 D 4.9 A 25.0 D00000204 23 61 3 %050 20 33WB 77 13 68 158 43.7E41.0E21.5 C 33.9 D 6.7 A00000418 67 218 26 % 6 % 5043100NB 10 1062 62 1,134 7.7 A 4.1 A 3.7 A 4.1 A100 20 2701 % 792 20 7300140020SB 58 481 29 568 14.7 B 1.7 A 1.7 A 3.0 A100 27 700038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 307 809 39 1,155 58.0E20.4 C 17.6 B 30.4 C150184 23003 % 382 2203803 %0000WB 77 443 396 916 37.5 D 21.6 C 21.9 C 23.0 C 33.7 C 200 53 12101 % 390 1883491 %0000NB 31 122 26 179 62.5E52.6 D 44.1 D 52.9 D50 31100047 % 438 114 25700 000SB 448 85 104 637 58.8E37.0 D 23.7 C 49.9 D590 2635624 % 1 %0143 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia AveEB01242 41 1,2830.0 06.6 A 4.3 A 6.5 A00003 % 390 88 289 11 %0000WB091609160.001.2 A0.0 01.2 A 6.2 A0000015202000 000NB00174 1740.0 033.2 D 33.2 D00000 00000295 88 224SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0943 474 1,4170.0 021.0 C 8.7 A 17.0 B00000152166 209007580 181WB 344 5420886 48.6 D 18.1 B0.0 029.8 C 27.8 C00000378 27246300 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 689 66 374 1,129 50.3 D 59.9E16.5 B 39.7 D500 252430001106 295 486 9 %0300 13239850th St & NB TH 100EB01313 319 1,6320.0 02.1 A 4.7 A 2.6 A0000037802000 000WB0886 353 1,2390.0 01.9 A 2.7 A 2.1 A 2.4 A0000017120 810025 2042NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden AveEB01409 9 1,4180.0 01.0 A 0.7 A 1.0 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 125 91301,038 19.0 C 0.4 A0.0 02.6 A 6.8 A 120 5413200327 20 6800 000NB00249 2490.0 01.4 A 58.4F56.6F00000242 15432100 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 2 3900392 4.2 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A10002000635 20 2000 000WB0371 4 3750.0 00.3 A 0.2 A 0.3 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1601430 9.6 A0.0 03.8 A 6.8 A00000345 20 4200 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 1 389 16 406 10.3 B 1.6 A 0.7 A 1.6 A00000140 20 11000 000WB 18 3620380 4.9 A 0.8 A0.0 01.0 A 1.7 A0000067 209400 000NB 11019 30 12.1 B0.0 010.9 B 11.3 B320 20 2800 00000100 20 32SB 402 6 10.4 B0.0 02.7 A 7.8 A00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 54 305 53 412 3.1 A 3.9 A 2.9 A 3.7 A0000067 357600 000WB 52 180 83 315 2.8 A 3.1 A 2.9 A 3.0 A 3.6 A0000082 308900 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 91 10 186 4.3 A 4.9 A 4.3 A 4.6 A00000642 29 7300 000SB 28 116 115 259 3.6 A 3.6 A 3.4 A 3.5 A00000156 31 9200 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 20027 47 6.5 A0.0 01.2 A 3.7 A 0.5 A 340 20 4800 00000 000NB021502150.000.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB024002400.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A00000588 20 2000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 10014 24 5.7 A0.0 03.4 A 4.3 A 0.4 A00000235 20 4000 000NB0201 27 2280.0 00.2 A 0.0 A 0.2 A000002002000 000SB 11 2490260 1.6 A 0.1 A0.0 00.1 A000002020 2800 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB022802280.0 00.7 A0.0 00.7 A0000015602000 000SB025902590.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A000002002000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 147 2490396 5.3 A 6.5 A0.0 06.1 A00000700 39 16600 000WB0185 177 3620.0 02.3 A 2.2 A 2.3 A 3.8 A0000079 309200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1660160 326 3.1 A 1.1 A 2.9 A 2.9 A0000080 2611500 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 167 237 415 1.8 A 2.1 A 1.8 A 1.9 A0000079 207900 000WB55 74 5 134 3.5 A 4.0 A 3.6 A 3.8 A 3.0 A00000314 20 6400 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 265077 342 4.2 A0.0 04.0 A 4.2 A00000432 35 10900 000SB 5023 28 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000349 20 3300 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 2590235 494 34.4 D0.0 04.5 A 19.7 C320 12430600 00000200 42202WB0043 430.0 0 0.0 08.0 A 8.0 A 11.1 B00000159 24 5100 000NB 120 202 2 324 3.2 A 2.4 A 1.1 A 2.7 A0000080 3011600 000SB091 5 960.0 00.4 A 0.3 A 0.4 A0000018002000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B4Grandview Yard2042 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 33.5 C 28.5 C 5.0 A 26.0 C50 20 3501 % 356 20 4800 000WB 210 2 200 412 20.0 C 9.9 A 9.0 A 14.6 B 21.2 C 100 8214801 % 635 66 20500 000NB 2 654 274 930 62.3E31.7 C 6.3 A 24.5 C 100 20 81024 % 379 1963623 %0250 71265SB 123 404 12 539 29.5 C 17.9 B 16.0 B 20.4 C 145 7016801 % 792 93 188 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 13 4 13 30 22.8 C 21.2 C 5.6 A 14.0 B00000204 20 390050 20 33WB 55 4 64 123 24.6 C 27.8 D 16.3 C 20.4 C 4.9 A00000418 38 129 7 % 4 % 50 3089NB 14 759 81 854 7.5 A 4.0 A 4.1 A 4.1 A 100 20 2500792 20 8200140020SB 60 492 31 583 10.9 B 1.4 A 1.3 A 2.4 A 100 24 7000 00000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 187 590 67 844 37.0 D 23.9 C 23.2 C 26.7 C 150 10922402 % 382 2133942 %0000WB 90 400 325 815 31.3 C 14.6 B 13.5 B 15.9 B 25.4 C 200 54 12700390 121 28800 000NB 20 70 14 104 40.9 D 42.4 D 27.2 C 40.1 D 50 2072024 % 438 60 13100 000SB 393 89 171 653 39.7 D 31.4 C 18.6 B 33.1 C 590 202 424 1 % 1 %0124 26600 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0963 34 9970.0 010.1 B 6.8 A 10.0 B00005 % 390 13037419 %0000WB081508150.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 8.2 A00000 00000000NB00183 1830.0 032.2 D 32.2 D00000 00000295 90259SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0742 403 1,1450.0 025.8 C 12.3 B 21.0 C00000152169 209007593 193WB 439 57801,017 45.1 D 16.2 B0.0 028.8 C 25.6 C0000037832248400 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 385 72 237 694 37.3 D 41.8 D 11.0 B 28.7 C500 117 226001106 168 28000300 58 15850th St & NB TH 100EB0727 400 1,1270.0 01.7 A 4.6 A 2.7 A00000 00000 000WB01017 617 1,6340.0 04.0 A 5.2 A 4.5 A 3.8 A00000171 25 14502 % 2527 58NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 0000000050th St & Eden AveEB0727 4 7310.0 00.6 A 0.3 A 0.6 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 192 144701,639 8.0 A 0.8 A0.0 01.7 A 1.9 A 120 521140032702000 000NB00203 2030.0 00.4 A 8.6 A 8.3 A00000242 51 14000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 4 3810385 4.1 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A100 20 300063502000 000WB0391 3 3940.0 00.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 04.2 A 4.2 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 3 263 115 381 4.2 A 1.8 A 0.6 A 1.5 A00000140 20 7100 000WB 161 336 3 500 8.2 A 3.4 A 1.4 A 4.9 A 6.5 A00000676613000000NB 560159 215 48.3E0.0 08.2 A 18.8 C320 41 17700 00000100 38135SB 402 6 25.8 D0.0 09.7 A 20.4 C00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 52 324 50 426 2.2 A 3.1 A 2.1 A 2.9 A0000067 297300 000WB 47 311 100 458 3.7 A 4.6 A 4.1 A 4.4 A 4.1 A0000082 5015200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 74 16 157 4.2 A 5.2 A 4.0 A 4.7 A00000642 30 8100 000SB 16 49 122 187 4.6 A 5.0 A 5.4 A 5.2 A00000156 38 10700 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 57017 74 6.6 A0.0 01.4 A 5.5 A 1.1 A 340 29 5900 00000 000NB024602460.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 6300 000SB012201220.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A00000 00000000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 2002 10.6 B0.0 0 0.0 010.6 B00000261 20 2400 000WB 15022 37 7.7 A0.0 06.6 A 7.0 A 0.8 A00000235 22 4800 000NB 1 222 10 233 1.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A000002002000 000SB 4 174 1 179 1.7 A 0.3 A 0.2 A 0.3 A000002020 3800 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 7007 9.6 A0.0 0 0.0 09.6 A00000268 20 3600 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.6 A00000 00000 000NB 1 2260227 2.3 A 0.5 A0.0 00.5 A0000015602000 000SB0187 2 1890.0 00.4 A 0.6 A 0.4 A000002002000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 197 2360433 3.7 A 5.3 A0.0 04.6 A00000700 34 13300 000WB0260 109 3690.0 03.0 A 5.3 A 3.6 A 3.9 A0000079 4912500 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1500255 405 3.5 A 1.4 A 3.7 A 3.5 A0000080 4215300 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 150 225 386 1.2 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 1.4 A0000079 207000 000WB 44 147 5 196 3.0 A 4.3 A 3.5 A 4.0 A 2.4 A00000314 25 8000 000MINI ROUNDABOUTNB 217048 265 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000432 27 7700 000SB 505 10 2.6 A 0.3 A 3.3 A 0.7 A00000349 20 2400 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 1820322 504 12.8 B0.0 02.7 A 6.4 A320 59 14300 00000200 20 109WB00440.0 0 0.0 03.9 A 3.9 A 4.0 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 161 143 2 306 1.9 A 1.3 A 0.5 A 1.5 A0000080 218600 000SB084 5 890.0 00.4 A 0.6 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2500 000Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s)AM Peak Hour Grandview Yard2042 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand VolumesDelay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn LaneThrough Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 15.0 B 22.3 C 4.5 A 15.9 B50 20 2001 % 356 20 5300 000WB 237 4 171 412 25.9 C 7.9 A 12.3 B 20.0 C 18.6 B 1009814901 % 635 88 28600 000NB 2 967 299 1,268 38.2 D 24.0 C 6.3 A 20.0 C100 20 21031 % 379 2133844 %0250 83302SB 113 522 7 642 26.8 C 12.7 B 8.0 A 15.0 B145 5813101 % 792 91 182 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young LnEB 13 13 13 39 30.3 D 37.6E5.7 A 24.2 C00000204 20 61 3 %050 20 41WB 79 13 68 160 38.3E48.3E19.8 C 30.9 D 6.9 A00000418 64 166 25 % 8 % 504498NB 10 1062 65 1,137 9.0 A 4.6 A 4.0 A 4.6 A100 20 2801 % 792 20 10500140020SB 58 481 29 568 17.1 C 1.8 A 1.6 A 3.5 A100 32910038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 307 809 39 1,155 55.2E25.2 C 22.9 C 33.1 C150191 22906 % 382 2464066 %0000WB 93 443 396 932 39.8 D 21.4 C 21.7 C 23.3 C 37.3 D 200 65 13801 % 390 1863531 %0000NB 31 122 35 188 64.9E56.0E44.9 D 55.4E50 3097048 % 438 127 30900 000SB 448 85 104 637 69.2E49.3 D 31.1 C 60.3E590 3177385 % 1 %0162 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia AveEB0125141 1,2920.0 08.2 A 6.4 A 8.1 A00006 % 390 12435614 %0000WB093209320.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 8.0 A0000015202000 000NB00195 1950.0 041.1E41.1E00000 00000295 113281SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0973 474 1,4470.0 022.5 C 11.6 B 18.9 B00000152175 213007596 184WB 344 5520896 64.2E21.4 C0.0 038.2 D 30.5 C0000037832648800 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 689 85 380 1,154 49.3 D 62.5E17.4 B 39.5 D 500 251432001106 298 489 9 %0300 12938450th St & NB TH 100 EB01315347 1,6620.0 02.2 A 5.0 A 2.8 A0000037802000 000WB0896 353 1,2490.0 03.4 A 2.8 A 3.2 A 3.0 A00000171 20 121 1 %025 2043NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden AveEB01411 9 1,4200.0 01.0 A 0.8 A 1.0 A00000342 20 2200 000WB 138 91701,055 20.4 C 0.4 A0.0 03.0 A 6.4 A 120 6214500327 20 8100 000NB00258 2580.0 06.0 A 51.9F50.5F00000242 14531400 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside AveEB 2 3990401 3.5 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A1000200063502000 000WB037722 3990.0 00.4 A 0.2 A 0.4 A 1.1 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 25014 39 11.7 B0.0 04.0 A 9.1 A00000345 20 4700 000Eden Ave & OLG EntranceEB 3 405 16 424 10.5 B 1.5 A 0.4 A 1.5 A00000140 20 8100 000WB 18 384 4 406 4.9 A 0.8 A 0.4 A 0.9 A 1.7 A0000067 208600 000NB 11019 30 12.7 B0.0 011.7 B 12.0 B320 20 2600 00000100 20 36SB 604 10 16.9 C0.0 03.5 A 11.5 B00000239 20 2800 000Eden Ave & Arcadia AveEB 70 307 53 430 3.3 A 3.9 A 3.1 A 3.7 A0000067 377600 000WB 52 184 111 347 3.0 A 3.3 A 3.0 A 3.2 A 3.7 A0000082 369600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 95 10 190 4.4 A 5.0 A 3.6 A 4.7 A00000642 29 8700 000SB 33 118 137 288 3.7 A 3.5 A 3.6 A 3.6 A00000156 34 9500 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000000WB 39027 66 7.2 A0.0 01.3 A 5.0 A 0.8 A 340 21 6400 00000 000NB023702370.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB024102410.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A00000588 20 2000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 15028 43 9.1 A0.0 03.7 A 5.6 A00000261 26 5700 000WB 10014 24 7.2 A0.0 04.4 A 5.4 A 0.9 A00000235 20 4800 000NB 43 208 27 278 1.7 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.4 A000002020 3600 000SB 11 254 15 280 1.5 A 0.2 A 0.2 A 0.3 A000002020 3100 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 6006 8.4 A0.0 0 0.0 08.4 A00000268 20 3300 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.7 A00000 00000 000NB 4 2720276 2.3 A 0.9 A0.0 00.9 A00000156 20 5500 000SB0288 4 2920.0 00.4 A 0.1 A 0.4 A000002020 2000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 147 2560403 4.5 A 5.5 A0.0 05.1 A00000700 33 14300 000WB0198 177 3750.0 02.5 A 2.8 A 2.6 A 3.5 A0000079 3410600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1660179 345 2.9 A 1.4 A 2.9 A 2.8 A0000080 2811700 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 174 237 422 1.4 A 2.0 A 1.7 A 1.8 A0000079 207900 000WB 55 87 5 147 3.7 A 4.3 A 3.3 A 4.0 A 3.0 A00000314 22 7600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 265077342 4.0 A0.0 03.9 A 4.0 A00000432 31 10900 000SB 5023 28 4.1 A0.0 03.7 A 3.8 A00000349 20 3600 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100EB 2650254 519 28.6 D0.0 04.0 A 16.6 C320 114 26700 00000200 29192WB0043 430.0 0 0.0 07.8 A 7.8 A 9.6 A00000159 23 5900 000NB 120 202 2 324 3.0 A 2.1 A 0.9 A 2.4 A0000080 3011100 000SB091 5 960.0 00.4 A 0.7 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour The CITY of EDINA The CITY of EDINA Evolution of Grandview Yard Proposal for 5146 Eden Avenue (2010 – 2022 Summary) August 5, 2022 Prepared by Bill Neuendorf,  Economic Development Manager The current redevelopment proposal for 5146 Eden Avenue is based on ten years of  community engagement and exploration of nine previous concepts. The background that  led to the current proposal is summarized here. 1 Vision Planning for Grandview District 52+ member group of residents prepared vision  plan from 2010‐2012; Framework approved by  City Council in April 2012 •Seven Guiding Principles •Transportation, Land Use, Sustainability &  Public Realm components •Transition away from industrial uses and  toward neighborhood node with mixed‐uses •Improve multi‐modal connectivity •Create “go to” and “stay at” place •Create meaningful public realm experience 2 From 2010 to 2012, two Community Advisory Teams  were assembled to provide guidance  and recommendations to the City Council regarding the re‐use of the 3‐acre property that  was home to the Edina Public Works Department since 1962. Having outgrown site and  facility, a new larger property at 7450 Metro Blvd. was purchased and the Public Works  Department relocated to that new facility. Led by members of the Planning Commission  and other concerned stakeholders, these Community Advisors realized that this change  presented an opportunity to transition away from the industrial‐type uses that remained in  Grandview area. The preferred direction is better integrated with the surrounding  residential neighborhoods and businesses. 2 Vision Planning for Grandview District 3 The first Community Advisory Team prepared Seven Guiding Principles to shape the long‐ term vision for this area. These Principles were also embraced by the second Community  Advisory Team and approved by the City Council in 2012. 3 Vision Plan for 5146 Eden Ave. 2012 Development Framework envisioned  (see pages 18‐21) Residential 82* units Community  structure 50,000*  Sq Ft Public realm 28,000* Sq Ft; activated  and connected Parking Shared and organized East west  connector Bridge spanning railroad  tracks Sidewalks Along Eden & Arcadia * Approximate sizes 4 The second Community Advisory Team  prepared a mixed‐use vision for the old Public  Works site at 5146 Eden Ave. A public green space was envisioned to complement a  possible public facility like a community center. These elements were envisioned to be  constructed on top of a multi‐level underground parking structure to be used by residents,  visitors and downtown commuters. The inclusion of new residential buildings was  considered essential so that people would be in this area 24‐hours per day –not just when  the businesses were open. There was a great deal of conversation about a public facility  like a community center. Some members of the advisory team liked the idea of a new  community building located north of Hwy 62 to better serve the northern neighborhoods  of Edina. Transportation routes and public realms connections were also strongly supported  by the members of the advisory team. 4 2016 ‐City  hires HRA &  Pros Consult  to study  community  center but  construction  and  operational  costs higher  than  supported 2018 ‐City re‐ engages  Frauenshuh to  study high‐rise  and mid‐rise  options with  arts/senior  center  but  unable to  reconcile  public costs 5 2021 – 2022 ‐City re‐engages  Frauenshuh to coordinate  for‐sale housing developer  with hospitality user and  public space 2020 ‐City re‐ engages  Frauenshuh to  study more  traditional  mixed uses with  simple public  open space but  concept not well  received 2018          2020 FOR 5146 EDEN AVENUE In 2013, a third Community Advisory Team was assembled to refine plans  and process to  redevelop the 5146 Eden site.  Ultimately, a Request for Interest (RFI) was issued to the real  estate development community. After interviewing many different development teams, the  City Council chose to work with a team that was led by Frauenshuh and Opus.  Using the initial (2012) vision as a starting point, the City/HRA explored eight different  concepts with Frauenshuh and a variety of design partners. Creation of an acceptable  development plan proved to be vastly more complicated than initially envisioned. A wide  variety of concepts were considered, evaluated and explored. A concept to eliminate the  housing and retain the full parcel for a larger community building was also considered.  Many hurdles were encountered and at times, the Edina HRA considered starting over with  new partners. The first eight concepts evaluated in partnership with Frauenshuh were deemed  unacceptable due a wide variety of reasons. The high construction and operational costs of  a large‐scale community building were concerning to the City Council due to the high debt  burden potentially imposed on tax payers. Partnerships with Metro Transit were initially  considered, but Metro Transit’s priorities shifted as the final layout of the Southwest LRT  took shape (Grandview is no longer anticipated to include a park‐n‐ride).  Summaries of the  eight concepts follow. 5 6 Concept #1 Central Civic with North  Residential and South Office Initial Concepts for DiscussionDiscovering the PotentialMay 19, 2015 Public Workshop Public Space &  Public Parking Multi‐Family  residential Office Concept #2 Central Civic with North  Residential and South Residential Concept #3 North Civic with South Residential Birds‐eye view of initial concepts 1, 2 & 3; prepared by Reynolds Design Group to  determine community preferences for future redevelopment at 5146 Eden Ave. Concept #3  –a mixture of housing, parking and community space with strong public realm  improvements was the preferred direction. The next concepts more fully explored the  elements in Concept #3. 6 Preliminary Program •60,000+ SF community  center •8,000 SF restaurant/café •New east‐west shared  street •outdoor civic plaza •170 apartments •57% public land & 43%  private •Streetscaping of Eden &  Arcadia •Widening of Arcadia 7 Concept #4 Civic and Residential combination September 1, 2015 Public Parking This September 2015 concept demonstrates how a new community facility with multi‐level  underground parking could serve as a catalyst to encourage investment in surrounding  properties. A six‐story residential building (with underground parking) was envisioned for the south  portion of the property. This concept anticipated a large‐scale community building with space for arts and general  community programming. A large restaurant and new shared street/bridge was also  included in this concept. As the building grew, the remaining green space continued to be  reduced. 7 8 Concept #5 Performing Arts / Community Center Concept 2015‐2016 •HGA Architects •May 2016 •70,000 Sq. Ft. •$43 million capital cost The general interest in Concept #4 led to further programming and cost exploration in  2016. The City hired HGA architects, Schuler and Shook Associates and Prose Consulting to  prepare a more refined concept of a large‐scale community building that could house an  expanded art center, a community theater and multi‐generational community space to host  events for seniors and residents of all ages. As the operations were better understood, the  conceptual facilty grew in size and cost. Due to the operations during the typical business  hours, shared parking would not be possible. The Edina HRA/City Council was not supportive of this concept due to the high construction  cost, the high operational and maintenance costs and the low rate of cost recovery. After  this Concept was abandoned, the City took some time off from site planning. 8 High Rise Concept Study •Residential High‐Rise •Art/Senior civic facility •Artist/affordable lofts •District parking •Green rooftop park plaza 9 Concept #6 Art/Senior Center with public green and Residential January 2018 With the large‐scale community facilty unable to win funding support, the development  team considered other options. A more ambitious and transformational concept was  explored to determine if increased density and scaled down civic facility might yield more  attractive fiscal benefits to the City. This concept included luxury high‐rise apartments,  affordable and/or artist townhouses, underground public parking, three level combination  arts center and senior center with rooftop green space. After initial review, the  construction and operational costs to the City were not supported by the City  Council/Edina HRA. This concept was abandoned. 9 •140‐150 apartments •20k to 50k Sq Ft Arts & Senior Facility •Green space •Shared parking •May to September 2018 •Operational study to estimate cost recovery 10 Concept #7 Community Arts and Active Adult Center July 2018 Another scaled down hybrid concept was explored in spring/summer 2018. This concept  included a mid‐rise apartment building and a smaller community building intended to  solely replace Edina’s art center and senior center. It was hoped that this concept would  cost less for the City to build and operate, while also allowing room for open green space.  Under this concept, about 1.5 acres would be sold for private apartments and 1.8 acres  retained for public use. While construction costs were reduced, operational efficiencies were not achieved due to  the larger staff required to operate the new community building. The City Council was  concerned about the impact of this project to the tax payers. The City and Frauenshuh  were also unable to find agreeable real estate terms. This concept was abandoned. 10 11 Concept #8 Residential, Office, Public Outdoor Space  (December 2020) •90 for‐sale housing units •30k to 50k Sq Ft medical office •Public green space •East west connector bridge •Covered parking •December 2020 The pandemic of 2019‐2020 scuttled efforts to re‐initiate site planning efforts for nearly  two years. In late 2020, Frauenshuh suggested a pure market‐rate development that  provided revenue to the City/HRA without the high debt burden of building a new  community facility. This concept included an outdoor public green space that would be  constructed and maintained by the owners. This concept also included the public realm  improvements (sidewalks and pedestrian bridge) and added a mixture of day‐time users  and 24‐hour residents.  This concept was not well received and found many critics during the Sketch Plan review  phase of spring 2021. This concept was abandoned. 11 None of the nine (9) previous concepts  have advanced past the exploratory  phase. Unresolved hurdles include: •Undesirable real estate terms •Lack of interest in shared parking by Metro  Transit •High construction cost of public facility •High cost of structured parking for public facility •High operational cost of public facility •Concerns about debt burden to City taxpayers •Unclear need, demand and support for new  public facility at this location The 2022 Grandview Yard proposal is  based on insight collected over ten years  of public input and concept exploration. 12 Since the Grandview Development Framework was completed in 2012, the City has  explored nine (9) different redevelopment scenarios for this site. Unfortunately, none of  these concepts have gained a sufficient degree of support to move forward and be funded  and constructed.  In Spring 2022, the City set out to prepare a full proposal for Concept #10.The Grandview  Yard proposal includes three elements that have generally received higher levels of support  as community input has been solicited over the years. The elements are: (1) for‐sale  housing, (2) restaurant with indoor and outdoor dining, and (3) extensive outdoor public  realm assets and improvements centered upon an outdoor public space that can be  activated for a variety of community‐oriented purposes. 12 Grandview Yard  Proposal – August 2022 13 In June 2022, the Edina HRA entered into sales contracts with United Properties and Jester  Concepts. The Edina HRA then engaged Confluence and Loucks to prepare a site plan that  accommodates new housing, new restaurant and new public green space. A formal  proposal to rezone and redevelop the site was submitted by United Properties. That  proposal will be reviewed and considered by the Edina Planning Commission and Edina City  Council in August /September 2022. 13 Grandview Yard Proposal –Shared Restaurant Parking 14 Proposed 15,000 Sq Ft restaurant  on 0.7 acres with shared parking Typical 11,000 sq ft restaurant on 3.1 acres with 230+ private parking stalls 32 parking stalls Food and drink was a consistent desire by community residents of all ages. The proposed  restaurant is intended to be the “attractor” to the site. The restaurant is designed to meet  the needs of many types of customers so that it can be successful for years to come. From  a land use perspective, the restaurant site is highly efficient – rather than 200+ dedicated  parking stalls (like most suburban restaurants), only 32 stalls are proposed on site with  most employees and customers intending to use valet parking or the adjacent public  parking garage. 14 Comparison of 2022 Proposal vs 2012 Vision 2012 Development  Framework 2022 Grandview Yard Proposal Residential 82 units 86‐90 for‐sale units proposed Community structure 50,000 Sq Ft 15,000 Sq Ft restaurant with indoor and outdoor  event spaces proposed Grandview Commons  green space 28,000 Sq Ft Approx 28,000 Sq Ft public green space proposed Parking Shared and organized;  work cooperatively with  Metro Transit Private parking for residents; shared parking for  restaurant and public space; rely on existing  Grandview Parking Structure rather than building  more public parking; Metro Transit not interested in  park‐n‐ride for this area East‐west connector Sidewalk, bridge and road  spanning railroad tracks Pedestrian bridge and sidewalk under construction;  roadway not feasible Sidewalks Along Arcadia and Eden Proposed along Arcadia and Eden 15 In conclusion, the 2022 Grandview Yard proposal is based on ten years of community  engagement and concept exploration. While a large publicly owned and financed  community building does not seem likely for this site, the Edina HRA board and project  team intend to deliver they type of experience described in the Development Framework  using a privately operated restaurant and public green space as the attractors to the site. 15 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2022-___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-24, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-24, AT 5146 EDEN AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-517 Planned Unit Development District-24 (PUD-24) – Grandview Yard (a) Legal description: (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on ___________ except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2022-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multifamily Residential Parks (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD- 2 Zoning District, the following shall apply: (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-2 Zoning District for the retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. (h) The residential housing on the site shall include 10% of all the dwelling units (9 units) to meet the City’s definition of affordable housing at the time of approval. Proposed (Measured from building to the lot line) Building Setbacks to the lot line - Residential Front – East (Eden Avenue) Front – South (Arcadia Avenue) Side – West Rear – North Building Setbacks to the lot line - Restaurant Front – East (Eden Avenue) Front – South (Arcadia Avenue) Side – West Rear – North 5 feet 5 feet 10 feet 300 feet 10 feet 130 feet 10 feet 140 feet Building Height 7 stories Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 45% 1.5% Parking Stalls – Residential (Senior Housing) Parking Stalls – Restaurant 143 spaces Variance required (31 spaces on site plus the Jerry’s parking ramp) Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of _______, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2022. ________________________________ City Clerk 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 PROPERTY OWNER EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY4801 W. 50th St., Edina MN 55424 UNITED PROPERTIES JESTER CONCEPTS (612) 354-3135 | POPE DESIGN GROUP SHEA LOUCKS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. SENIOR COOPERATIVE RESTAURANT GRANDVIEWYARD 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 • • • •• • • • Johnston, IA• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • •• • ••• •• • • •Edina, MN • • • •• • •• • COV, Edina, MN •• • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 2 2 3 4 6 7 8 5 1 1 3 54 6 78 TRAMMELL CROW SENIOR APARTMENTS JERRY’S FOODS JERRY’S ENTERPRISES PARKING RAMP RETAIL RETAIL THE HILLTOPOUR LADY OF GRACE CATHOLIC CHURCH 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONLEGEND 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 ARCADIA AVEEDEN AVEBROOKSIDE AVE 1 1 2 2 3 3 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 The proposed scale of development is appropriate for a new mixed-use neighborhood and a public green-space combine to create a new place for neighborhood residents with all resident parking and move-in access located below-grade and accessed from The development improves movement within and access to the District for people of 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 ---------- .43 ---- ----------273 3.09 86 143 -- 174 273 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 GRANDVIEWYARD RESTAURANT SENIORCOOPERATIVE 1 2 5 3 4 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PUBLIC ART SCULPTURES & INTERACTIVE ARTWORK LOCATED IN PROMINENT AREAS COOKING & DINING EXPERIENCE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ACROSS SITES RESIDENT BALCONIES ALONG ARCADIA AVENUE TO PROMOTE ACTIVITY & RECESSED TO PROMOTE INCORPORATED BUILDING CIRCULATION INTO LANDSCAPE TERRACES STAIRWAY CONNECTIONS TO ARCADIA PUBLIC ART SCULPTURES LOCATED IN PROMINENT AREAS SEATING TO ACTIVATE PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 GRANDVIEW YARD TERRACE SEATING PUBLIC EVENT LAWN ADA PED ROUTE ACTIVITY AREAOUTDOORDINING ARCADIA AVE SECTIONENTRY PLAZA OUTDOOR PLAZA RESTAURANT SENIOR COOPERATIVE PARKING EXISTINGRAILROADSERVICE AREA RESTAURANT VALET PUBLICRESTROOM PEDBRIDGE SHORTTERM PARKING UPPER PARKING ACCESS LOWER PARKING ACCESS LANDSCAPETERRACE + PUBLIC ART AMENITY COURTYARD 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 PROPOSED SECTION PROPOSED GRANDVIEW YARD PROPOSED SENIOR COOPERATIVE 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 GRANDVIEW YARD TERRACE SEATING PUBLIC EVENT LAWN ADA PED ROUTE OUTDOORDINING ARCADIA AVE SECTIONENTRY PLAZA OUTDOOR PLAZA RESTAURANT PARKING EXISTINGRAILROADSERVICE AREA RESTAURANT VALET PUBLICRESTROOM PEDBRIDGE SHORTTERM PARKING UPPER PARKING ACCESS LOWER PARKING ACCESS LANDSCAPETERRACE + PUBLIC ART AMENITY COURTYARD PUBLIC ART IS PROPOSED TO BE INTERWOVEN THROUGHOUT THE PUBLIC REALM AREAS INCLUDING THREE INSTALLATIONS IN THE YARD: AT THE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE ALONG ARCADIA, COVERED OPEN AIR GAZEBO ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC EVENT LAWN, ENGAGING SERIES OF ART ELEMENTS ALONG THE ADA PEDESTRIAN ROUTE. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC ART IS ANTICIPATED IN STRATEGIC LOCATIONS OF THE SENIOR CO-OP SITE. SENIOR COOPERATIVE ACTIVITY AREA 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 RESTAURANT GRANDVIEW YARD SENIORCOOPERATIVE 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 RESTAURANT GRANDVIEWYARD SENIORCOOPERATIVE 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 PUBLICEVENT LAWN TERRACESEATING ADA PEDROUTE OUTDOORDININGRESTAURANT PEDBRIDGE PARKING PARKINGSERVICE AREA RESTAURANT VALET EXISTINGRAILROAD ACTIVITY AREA 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 TERRACESEATING ADA PEDROUTE OUTDOORDINING RESTAURANT PEDBRIDGE PARKING PARKING SERVICE AREA RESTAURANTVALET EXISTING RAILROAD FUTURE ARTISTIC GAZEBO FUTURE SERIES OF ENGAGING ART PIECES PUBLICEVENT LAWN ACTIVITY AREA 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 TERRACESEATING ADA PED ROUTE OUTDOORDINING RESTAURANT PEDBRIDGE PARKING PARKING SERVICEAREA RESTAURANTVALET EXISTINGRAILROAD FUTUREARTISTICGATEWAY PUBLIC EVENT LAWN FUTURE ARTISTIC GAZEBO ACTIVITY AREA 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 TERRACE SEATING ADA PED ROUTE OUTDOORDINING RESTAURANT PARKING PARKING SERVICEAREA RESTAURANTVALET PUBLIC EVENT LAWN FUTURE ARTISTICGATEWAY FUTURE ARTISTIC GAZEBO FUTURE SERIES OF ENGAGING ART PIECES ACTIVITY AREA 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 FFE 934.52ND FLOOR 948BASEMENT 921.5 FFE 930.5BASEMENT 918.5 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 FFE 934.52ND FLOOR 948BASEMENT 921.5 FFE 930.5BASEMENT 918.5 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 FFE 934.52ND FLOOR 948BASEMENT 921.5 FFE 930.5BASEMENT 918.5 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 2. THE PROJECT INCLUDES BOTH PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE MCWD 325 BLAKE ROAD REGIONAL STORMWATER AND GREENWAY PROJECT (MCWDPROJECT) AND PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ALATUS 325 BLAKE ROAD MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRCUTIONACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS:a. INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP b. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND SITE, INLET PROTECTION IN STREET c. CLEAR AND GRUB SITEd. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOILe. REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES f. ROUGH GRADE SITE g. IMPORT CLEAN FILL AS NEEDED FOR REPLACEMENT AND BALANCE h. INSTALL UTILITIES i. INSTALL STORMWATER SYSTEM BUT KEEP OFFLINE UNTIL SITE ESTABLISHEDj. INSTALL CURB & GUTTERk. FINAL GRADE SITE l. INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND SIDEWALKS m.INSTALL LANDSCAPING n. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER SYSTEMS WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILTFENCE AND RESTORE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 END OF LINE CLEANOUT IN LINE CLEANOUT 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 LOT 2 LOT 1 LOT 3 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 A - WOOD 137 6.5 1893 88.9 0 0 100 4.6 0 0 A - WOOD 550 41.3 755 56.5 30 2.2 0 0 0 0 A - WOOD 827 38.3 213 10.6301.4 6 .4 1090 49.3 A - WOOD 1477 62.6 155 6.6301.3 44 1.8 655 27.7 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 •••• ••• LOT 1 LOT 3 LOT 2 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 NAME AREA B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 NAME AREA COUNT B1 1 B2 2 B3 9 B4 10 B5 10 B6 6 B7 8 B8 8 B9 7 B10 8 B11 1 B12 4 B13 3 B14 1 B15 4 B16 4 LEVEL COUNT 102 37 4 143 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 MASONRY - 1 4945.58 18 MASONRY - 2 2235.88 8 8795.38 33 TEXTURED CONC. 3349.52 13 METAL PANEL 7511.21 28 MASONRY - 1 3794.72 14MASONRY - 2 1980.65 7 9136.58 34 TEXTURED CONC. 4913.66 18 METAL PANEL 7249.8 2759'-0"T.O. ROOF SHEATHING79'-0"4'-4"T.O. ROOF SHEATHING 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 MASONRY - 1 1430.61 10 MASONRY - 2 1508.34 11 5821.33 42 TEXTURED CONC. 1469.99 11 METAL PANEL 3510.03 26 MASONRY - 1 1357.42 11MASONRY - 2 1185.51 10 5239.82 45 TEXTURED CONC. 435.05 4 METAL PANEL 3515.83 30 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 WOOD LOOK PRECAST STONE DARK GREY VERTICAL METAL PANELS TEXTURED CONCRETEPRECAST STONE CELLULAR POLYCARBONATE PANELS 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 GREAT ROOM UNDERGROUND RESIDENT PARKING UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 EdinaMN.gov 1 Site EdinaMN.gov 2 Site Zoning -PID EdinaMN.gov 3 Site 3.PatternsforaNeighborhoodCenter Land Use LandUsePlan ArcadiaAveHwy100Public NeighborhoodCommercial Mixed-useCenter Office Medium/HighDensityResidential 154/05/12 Site 3.PatternsforaNeighborhoodCenter Land Use ArcadiaAveHwy100IllustrativeMasterPlan ExistingBuildings PotentialDevelopment ProposedCivicCommunityBuildings 164/05/12 Site 3.PatternsforaNeighborhoodCenter 27 4/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52ndSt 51stSt PublicRealm/Open SpaceDiagram A.GrandViewCommons B.GrandViewSteps C.GrandViewCrossing D.ArcadiaStreetscape E.GusYoungStreetscape F.ArcadeConnection G.VernonStreetscape H.EdenStreetscape Site Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments-5146 Eden Ave Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Grandview Yard, 5146 Eden Avenue VISITORS 23 CONTRIBUTORS 10 RESPONSES 10 1 Registered 0 Unverified 9 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 9 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 18, 2022 14:11:35 pm Last Seen:Aug 18, 2022 14:11:35 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mary Bean Q2.Address 5275 GRANDVIEW SQUARE, 3112, Edina 55436 Q3.Comment Much very hard, imaginative work has come from both the city and the developers, and for that I am grateful. The senior cooperative section of the plan looks good, but the restaurant is much too big for the area and the park is barely more than a lawn and a hillside with seating and paths to and from parking. This project would be so much stronger if the restaurant were eliminated or greatly reduced in capacity and if instead of just a lawn there were paths, flower gardens, and seating on the flat areas. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 19, 2022 10:15:41 am Last Seen:Aug 19, 2022 10:15:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steven Williams Q2.Address 4901 Hawthorne Court; Unit 103; Edina, MN 55436 Q3.Comment The project looks beautiful. It will be great when it's all done. But, between now and then, we have some real concerns about traffic congestion on Vernon Ave S, the intersection of Vernon Ave. S. and Interlachen, traffic emerging onto Vernon from Arcadia, during 2023, when the bridge is set for expansion. Can this area accommodate the road closures, the closing of the East or West bound lanes of Vernon as the bridge is being constructed, etc. To get to Hwy 100 from our home, we have to go up Brookside to Interlachen and make a left turn. That intersection ALREADY gets backed up. I just want to know if all this has been thought through, relative to timing or is all hell going to break loose in March of 2023? Thanks for listening! Steve Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 20, 2022 09:07:45 am Last Seen:Aug 20, 2022 09:07:45 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Chris Bauleke Q2.Address 5250 Grandview Square Q3.Comment This plan for the area on Eden Avenue and Arcadia is quite appropriate for the area. Big + is the large restaurant walkable for so many living in the Grandview area. A ? is the walkability to OLG church community along Eden Avenue, linking also to Arcadia avenue. Hopeful that the roundabout will slow down traffic in that area!!!!! - Pedestrian usage will be enhanced not limited or decreased. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 01, 2022 17:00:11 pm Last Seen:Sep 01, 2022 17:00:11 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sandy and Cal Simmons Q2.Address 5038 Bruce Place, Edina 55424 Q3.Comment Our thanks to the 3 Planning commissioners who are not rubber stamping what Scott Neal, Jim Hovland and the council say is necessary and wonderful. The article indicated there wasn't much feedback but, for most of us, the end of the summer isn't spent camping out at City Hall to see what is going on. It is disappointing and frustrating to watch the Edina City Council and Planning Commission change zoning regulations when it suits them for their own purposes. How about a city vote on whether Edina residents want this? What is the point of a Planning Commission if it doesn't abide by the rules that have been established? Livability in our city has diminished with increased traffic which is NEVER addressed. 50th Street cannot be widened but the city increases density in this area and the traffic issue is ignored by the Planning Commission, mayor and council. We have yet to see the results of the high rise going into the Perkins area. Parking requirements are being diminished because they are "outmoded since being established in the 1970s" but the increase in population/cars/traffic in 50 years is ignored as if it isn't relevant. "The Lid" and Grandview area plan was overwhelming UNPOPULAR with Edina residents but the Mayor and City Council seem determined to add several 6 plus story buildings in this area regardless. What is now happening is everything citizens did NOT want. It is 'The Lid' without 'the lid' to sell it as 'greenspace'. Edina's zoning regulations seem only to be applicable if they don't get in the city council's way. Rules don't mean anything if the ones in charge change them for their own needs. The Grandview area is NOT ZONED for what is about to be approved. If the Planning Commission follows its rules, this project cannot be approved. The charm of our city's unique 'downtown' corridor has been lost to high rise buildings, lack of parking, heavy traffic. Please maintain the vision and zoning requirements of a more community related use for the Grandview space and do not ignore the traffic implications of more density. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 02, 2022 12:50:09 pm Last Seen:Sep 02, 2022 12:50:09 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jack Bennett Q2.Address 5332 Interlachen Blvd Q3.Comment Please rethink the use of this land. We have a unique opportunity to create a space that draws people in from throughout the neighborhood as well as other parts of edina and the twin cities. Just like other cities have done recently we could utilize the basement for activities of all age groups: curling, laser tag, bowling, trampoline park, pickle ball, mini golf etc. The lot could be used for a destination experience, building off the areas of 50th and France and the West End, having a food hall, brewery, distillery, movie theater. Residential units should not be age restricted and the top level should be publicly available to do a roof top pool, bar or restaurant to take advantage of the unique views this area has to provide, after all it is called GRAND VIEW. I’m really disappointed in the proposed plans and strongly hope the city council reconsiders. A ton of residents agree and that’s why a coalition is being formed. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 05, 2022 06:42:59 am Last Seen:Sep 05, 2022 06:42:59 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Chip Howard Q2.Address 5812 West 61 St Q3.Comment City owned land is a rare commodity and shouldn’t be wasted. Even though the planning for this 3 acres has gone on for over a decade, we shouldn’t yield to project fatigue and simply trust city staff’s opinion, as several Planning Board members are willing to do. Staff indicates that the price tag to incorporate the resident-requested items, such as a new art center, are too expensive. But what about the option of using the new local sales tax that staff want to use for parks? The proposed project is not up to the standards we should establish for city-owned land. A restaurant and a senior housing project can be done anywhere in the city on private property. Why use valuable city land for this? As several Planning Board members said, we can do better than this. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 05, 2022 09:40:32 am Last Seen:Sep 05, 2022 09:40:32 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Cari Riis Stemmler Q2.Address 5101. Vernon Ave S Q3.Comment I own Paragon Pilates & PT and have been in the Jerrys Food building for 12 years. Paragon faces the back of the building & the park & bridge will enhance our work life experience. My staff & I support this development completely & we would appreciate & enjoy the public walkable space for us to use. Respondent No:8 Login:CaitErickson Email:caitverickson@gmail.com Responded At:Sep 07, 2022 18:41:13 pm Last Seen:Sep 08, 2022 01:12:48 am IP Address:68.63.219.238 Q1.First and Last Name Caitlin Erickson Q2.Address 5108 William Ave Q3.Comment Overall, I’m very excited about the plan (especially the potential for curling in the park during the winter- so fun). However, I noticed a lot of stairs in the park images. Why not use ramps instead? I frequently walk around the Grandview district and struggle walking to Jerry’s or the library with a stroller because there’s only stairs along the sidewalks. I’m forced to walk in the parking lots in front of traffic. I can only imagine how frustrating it would be if I required a wheelchair. We shouldn’t just give lip service to accessibility as a community- it should be easy for everyone to use the park. It would be a lot more accessible to everyone if ramps were used at grade changes throughout the space instead of stairs. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 08, 2022 07:57:25 am Last Seen:Sep 08, 2022 07:57:25 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bruce Carlson Q2.Address 5208 Glengarry Pkwy Q3.Comment It seems to me that we've rode this "horse into the ground", it's time to "pick a horse and ride it!" It really provide a little for everyone and will be a great gathering/green space for an area of need of some breathing room. I'm hopeful that, if needed in the future, this still could also serve as a "train/transportation stop" if light rail becomes a reality on the Dan Patch line. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 08, 2022 14:34:25 pm Last Seen:Sep 08, 2022 14:34:25 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Meriwether Felt Q2.Address 4116 Grimes Ave So Q3.Comment The plans look very nice and placing the park on the entire north side of the property make the park feel very accessible by the pedestrian bridge and the east side. The terracing is very well done. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 APPROVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PID, PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO PUD-24, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 24 AND SUBDIVISION/REPLAT, AT 5146 EDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 United Properties and Jester Concepts are proposing to re-develop the 3.3-acre vacant old public work site at 5146 Eden Avenue. At full build out, the project would include:  A 6-1/2-story, 86-unit senior cooperative project (owner occupied) with underground parking. (Applewood Pointe Cooperative) Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing (9 units).  A two-story, 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant with 31 surface parking stalls. Additional parking would rely on the public Jerry’s parking ramp to the west.  A 31,643 square foot green space/public plaza area with pedestrian walkways to the pedestrian bridge, now under construction, that will connect the Jerry’s parking ramp. 1.02 Phase 1 of the project would be the senior housing development. Phase 2 would be the restaurant site, followed by the park. The Phase 2 portion of the project would require future site and building plan review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. A Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, 2. Preliminary Development Plan; and 3. Subdivision to Replat the three existing lots. 1.05 On August 24, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Motion to approve the proposed plans failed. Vote: 3 Ayes and 3 Nays. 1.06 On September 7, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. The project provides 9 units of affordable housing within the development. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The provision of public space (public park) makes up 23% of the site. The pedestrian experience along Arcadia and Eden would be improved. The pedestrian bridge over the railroad tracks connects uses to the east to the Jerry’s public parking ramp. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. The 9 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. b. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. c. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. d. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses.” e. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 Page 3 proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” f. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. g. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. SEH conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the proposed project can be supported by the existing roads and proposed new configuration of Arcadia and Eden Avenue, including the round-a-bout. 7. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to existing conditions and previous development on the site. 8. The subdivision simply reconfigures the three existing lots. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD-24, Planned Unit Development District, Preliminary Development Plan and Subdivision/Replat for 5146 Eden Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated July 25, 2022. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 Page 4 6. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy and sustainable buildings policy. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated August 18, 2022. 10. Compliance with the SEH Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 13. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 14. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated August 15, 2022. 15. Maintenance of sidewalks and streets internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Arcadia Ave will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. Public sidewalk shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 Page 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 6, 2022. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 6, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2022. _________________________________ City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 DENYING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PID, PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO PUD-24, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 24 AND SUBDIVISION/REPLAT, AT 5146 EDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 United Properties and Jester Concepts are proposing to re-develop the 3.3-acre vacant old public work site at 5146 Eden Avenue. At full build out, the project would include:  A 6-1/2-story, 86-unit senior cooperative project (owner occupied) with underground parking. (Applewood Pointe Cooperative) Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing (9 units).  A two-story, 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant with 31 surface parking stalls. Additional parking would rely on the public Jerry’s parking ramp to the west.  A 31,643 square foot green space/public plaza area with pedestrian walkways to the pedestrian bridge, now under construction, that will connect the Jerry’s parking ramp. 1.02 Phase 1 of the project would be the senior housing development. Phase 2 would be the restaurant site, followed by the park. The Phase 2 portion of the project would require future site and building plan review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. A Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, 2. Preliminary Development Plan; and 3. Subdivision to Replat the three existing lots. 1.05 On August 24, 2022, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Motion to approve the proposed plans failed. Vote: 3 Ayes and 3 Nays. 1.06 On September 7, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Denial is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Seven Guiding Principles of the Grandview District. 2. The project does not include vertical mixed uses. 3. The proposed housing project is too large for the site, including the setbacks too closed to the front lot lines. 4. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The proposal does not meet the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD-24, Planned Unit Development District, Preliminary Development Plan and Subdivision/Replat for 5146 Eden Avenue based on the findings above. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-77 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 6, 2022. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 6, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2022. _________________________________ City Clerk Evolution of Grandview Yard Proposal for 5146 Eden Avenue (2010 –2022 Summary) August 5, 2022 Prepared by Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Vision Planning for Grandview District 52+ member group of residents prepared vision plan from 2010-2012; Framework approved by City Council in April 2012 •Seven Guiding Principles •Transportation, Land Use, Sustainability & Public Realm components •Transition away from industrial uses and toward neighborhood node with mixed-uses •Improve multi-modal connectivity •Create “go to” and “stay at” place •Create meaningful public realm experience 2 Vision Planning for Grandview District 3 None of the nine (9) previous concepts have advanced past the exploratory phase. Unresolved hurdles include: •Undesirable real estate terms •Lack of interest in shared parking by Metro Transit •High construction cost of public facility •High cost of structured parking for public facility •High operational cost of public facility •Concerns about debt burden to City taxpayers •Unclear need, demand and support for new public facility at this location The 2022 Grandview Yard proposal is based on insight collected over ten years of public input and concept exploration. 12 Grandview Yard Proposal –Shared Restaurant Parking 14 Proposed 15,000 Sq Ft restaurant on 0.7 acres with shared parking Typical 11,000 sq ft restaurant on 3.1 acres with 230+ private parking stalls 32 parking stalls Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2022-81 and Zoning Ordinance No. 2022-13: To revise the PUD-16 Zoning District to include a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan Review for 7200 and 7250 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2022-81 and grant first reading of Zoning Ordinance No. 2022-13. INTRODUCTION: Orion Investment is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for a completely new redevelopment project for the subject property. This site received a rezoning approval to Planned Unit Development-16 in 2019; however, the project was never constructed. T he underlying, or previous zoning on the site is POD, Planned Office District. T he existing PUD would allow two six-story buildings with 299 unit of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants and 10 owner occupied townhomes. The previous POD, Planned Office District, would allow 113,000 square feet of office/medical office use. The existing office buildings and parking ramp on the sites would be removed. T he existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. The project would be developed in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a five-story 124,620 square foot office building and coffee shop with underground parking at the 7250 France Site. T he 7200 site would include a ponding area, sidewalks, green space, landscaping and surface parking where the future building pad would be. Phase 2 would include a similar sized building in height and square footage, with the future use of housing with retail (150 units). P ermanent parking for Phase 1 would be required to be included in the Phase 2 development. This request would require the following: A Rezoning/Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District to establish a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan review for P hase 1. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report and Memos Resolution No. 2022-81 Ordinance No. 2022-13 Applicant Narrative AFO Review (Mic Johnson) Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Proposed Plans and Renderings 1 of 4 Proposed Plans and Renderings 2 of 4 Proposed Plans and Renderings 3 of 4 Proposed Plans and Renderings 4 of 4 Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Previously Approved Plans and Renderings Southdale Design Experience Guidelines Traffic and Parking Study Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Revised NorthSouth Road and Paths Elevation Revised Path September 14, 2022 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Zoning Ordinance Amendment, to revise the PUD-16 Zoning District to include a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan Review for 7200 and 7250 France Avenue Information / Background: Orion Investment is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for a completely new redevelopment project for the subject property. This site received a rezoning approval to Planned Unit Development-16 in 2019; however, the project was never constructed. (See attached approved plans.) The underlying, or previous zoning on the site is POD, Planned Office District. The existing PUD would allow two six-story buildings with 299 unit of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants and 10 owner occupied townhomes. The previous POD, Planned Office District would allow 113,000 square feet of office/medical office use. The existing office buildings and parking ramp on the sites would be removed. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. The project would be developed in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a five-story 124,620 square foot office building and coffee shop with underground parking at the 7250 France Site. The 7200 site would include a ponding area, sidewalks, green space, landscaping and surface parking where the future building pad would be. Phase 2 would include a similar sized building in height and square footage, with the future use of housing with retail (150 units). Permanent parking for Phase 1 would be required to be included in the Phase 2 development. This request would require the following: A Rezoning/Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District to establish a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan review for Phase 1. Flexibility is requested through the PUD for reduced setbacks building height, floor area ratio, building coverage and parking stalls. STAFF REPORT Page 2 The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process and per the attached applicant narrative have made the following changes to the plans in response:  Address the West Promenade Street Room typology 1A:  incorporated Woonerf in north-south direction  bikes and vehicles share Woonerf with striped bike lanes and vegetated median strip.  due to extreme grade changes, the Woonerf itself was not determined to be appropriate location for pedestrians to share; pedestrian paths are closer to proposed buildings for safety and accessibility.  West 72 ½ street (AKA Danila Street)  Developed to become a pedestrian-only public realm and a network of accessible green spaces with art located at intersection with France  Building scale and fenestration:  “75% of building walls to be at setback line to support creation of street room”  When considering Danila Street as “street” as defined by the applicable typologies, the proposed buildings meet this requirement.  “All building façades are prime (including parking) and must be designed accordingly. There is no back side of a building. “  Removed grocery store from program – all facades of proposed building have been carefully considered as prime with mix of human-scaled glazing and natural materials  “All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials facing the public realm.”  Natural materials have been selected for portions of all facades within first 60 feet of building above grade  “The landscape of the West Promenade should reinforce the characteristics of the neighborhood: tree lined to make sidewalks pleasant and safe to be on, creating a green vertical street room that is always pleasant to walk down”  Danila Street connects the greater Southdale district through this site with a pedestrian-scaled greenway featuring a mix of native landscape, paths with seating, and spaces primed for community events and art installations. This path connects further west to the beautified retention basin nature area, and to the north-south accessible pedestrian path connecting 72nd Street to Gallagher. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Senior Housing, Sunrise assisted living facility; zoned PSR-4, Planned Senior Citizen District and guided OR, Office Residential. Easterly: Macy’s Home Store; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Southerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential. Westerly: Apartments and duplexes; zoned PRD, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential, and zoned R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.2 acres in size, contains two existing 4-story office buildings, a parking ramp, surface parking and a wooded area. The parking ramp is in an extremely poor condition. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential. Zoning: PUD-16, Planned Unit Development -16 Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines - City Goals The development pattern is generally consistent with the previously approved plans and does attempt to address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. The following remain the highlights the proposal: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of public pedestrian and vehicle access and connections through the site (comprises 19% of the entire site); At final build out, there would be no visible surface parking stalls from France Avenue, and public realm created through the site. Phase 1 does include a surface parking lot with 83 parking stalls. The applicant has not followed the street room typology for the east-west street (Typology 4), where the building must step in after the initial 60 feet in height. That is the same for the area along France. Below is the typology that should be followed along France: Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 2 Cornelia Overlay at France Avenue France Avenue At sketch plan review, Mic Johnson, AFO, the City’s consultant on the Greater Southdale Area Vision Plan reviewed the revised plans and has provided feedback. (See attached AFO review.) The applicant has attempted to address the AFO review. (See attached applicant narrative. Meeting these street room typologies could be made a condition of any approval. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, (this application was made prior to the adoption of the new parking regulations) Phase 1, 124,620 s.f. of office and a 2,200 s.f. coffee shop would require 700 parking stalls (423 under the new ordinance.) The project would provide 317 parking stalls, 219 underground stalls and 15 surface stalls on the Phase 1 site, and 83 parking stalls on the Phase 2 site to the north. At full build out, including the additional 150 units of housing and 10,000 square feet of retail would require 900 parking stalls (606 under the new ordinance.) The project would provide 468 parking stalls. Stantec conducted a parking study to determine if the parking provided would be adequate. The study concludes that there would be adequate parking in both Phase 1 and Phase 2. (See attached study.) Parking needed for Phase 1 is 289 stalls (317 provided) and Parking needed for Phase 2 is 356 stalls (468 provided). Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access to the proposed development would be off Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The access off France Avenue has been eliminated. The result of the elimination of that access allows more green space on the site, as the right turn land is eliminated. Stantec conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project. (See attached traffic study.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 55 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that over 100 overstory trees on site. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required to outline public vs. private responsibilities and ownership for private improvement on public property. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of brick, stone, architectural metal panels, and glass. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading area and trash enclosures would be on the inside of the building/parking ramp. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Building Height The previously approved project for this site allowed building height up to 67.5 feet. The previous building height requirement for this site was 4 stories and 48 feet. The applicant is requesting flexibility from this standard through the new PUD rezoning of 84 feet. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings 5-6 stories tall be setback two times the height of the building from the property line of single-family homes. The building height is 84 feet; therefore a 168-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 255 feet, therefore would be code compliant. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal to add 150 units of housing and an office building with retail/commercial uses on France Avenue with extensive pedestrian walkway opportunities through and around the perimeter of the site would enhance the pedestrian experience in the area. The plans are consistent with the vision document for the Greater Southdale Area by providing a 50-foot STAFF REPORT Page 6 setback on France Avenue and 72nd Street. The Setback on Gallagher Drive is proposed at 25 feet, consistent with the previously approved plans. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the STAFF REPORT Page 7 PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; ii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and iii. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The previously approved plans were found to meet the above standards, and therefore, the site was rezoned to PUD. While the plans have been downgraded to make for a more economically feasible project, staff believes the proposal would still meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential,” which allows for office, retail and multi-family housing in a density range of up to 75 units per acre. The proposal still is a mixed-use (horizontal mixed-use) development including office, retail, and multi-family residential within the required density range. The previous project and existing zoning on this site requires affordable housing to be provided within the project. Staff recommends that the multi-family housing development provide 10% of the units within the project for affordable housing. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The site would be divided up with a public north-south vehicle, bike and pedestrian path as well as an east west pedestrian path. Parking would be primarily enclosed with limited surface parking behind the building, eliminating the surface parking that exists today. The project will be required to meet the City’s sustainability policy. The sustainability coordinator has reviewed the proposal and submitted comments within the engineering memo. (See attached.) Comprehensive Plan The proposed density and uses are all consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as OR, Office Residential The description of Land Uses within the Comprehensive Plan is as follows:  Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher-intensity districts and residential districts.  Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment.  Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail).  Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment.  50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use. STAFF REPORT Page 8 Compliance Table City Standard (PUD-16) (Measured to the curb) POD District (Measured to the curb) Proposed (Measured to the curb) Front – 72nd Street Front – France Ave. Front – Galagher Drive Side – West (north half) Side – West (south half 35 feet 39 feet 20 feet 90 feet 45 feet 30 feet 50 feet 30 feet 20 feet 20 feet 30 feet 50 feet 25 feet* 150 feet 90 feet Building Height 6 stories and 67 feet 4 stories and 48 feet 5-6 stories and 84 feet* Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.8 .50 1.0* Building Coverage .30 .31* Parking Office/retail – 456 spaces Housing – 150 spaces Total – 606 spaces 468 spaces* *Requires Variance from the original zoning requirement STAFF REPORT Page 9 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues  Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised PUD, for the following reasons: 1. While the plans are more flawed that the previously approved plans, they still do generally address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. Highlights continue to include: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and connections through the site both east-west and north-south; increasing the public realm on the site; eliminating most of the surface parking stalls, with none being visible from France Avenue in the Phase 2 build out. The street typology that requires buildings step in 10 feet above 60 feet in height shall be made a condition of approval. Affordable housing should be required within the future apartment project as well as public art located along France Avenue. They will be seeking a LEED certified building in Phase 1. 2. The project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan:  Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail).  Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment.  Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces.  Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways.  Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets.  Provision of the north-south public vehicle, bike and pedestrian connection through the site.  Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change.  Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base.  Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.  Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region.  Ensure that the city’s roads continue to evolve to act as connectors, rather than as barriers. Incorporate amenities and infrastructure into public corridors to make them beautiful, efficient, and multimodal public spaces that contribute to community identity and pride.  50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: STAFF REPORT Page 10  Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area.  The building would be of high-quality architectural brick, metal, stone, and glass.  Ensure that the buildings proposed in Phase 1 would be the only buildings built on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Phase 2 would be required to be multi-family residential with some retail commercial as long as there is adequate parking on the site for all phases.  Project would add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 10% of the units in Phase 2 for affordable housing.  Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan.  Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts.  Meet the City’s sustainability policy, including seeking a LEED certified building in Phase 1.  Provide 19% of the site for public use. 4. The provision of public space still makes up 19% of the site for the interior public sidewalks, driveways, bike space and public realm. If the public space in front of the building on France, Gallagher and 72nd street was included it would make up 38% of the site. (See attached public realm graphic.) 5. The proposed height is justified. While the proposed buildings would be taller than the previously approved project it would still meet the required setback of buildings 5-6 feet tall to R-1 property. Edina City Code requires that buildings 5-6 stories tall be setback two times the height of the building from the property line of single-family homes. The building height is 84 feet; therefore a 168-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 255 feet. 6. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Stantec conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below provides options for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider: Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Zoning Ordinance Amendment and new Overall Development Plan for PUD-16. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines like the originally approved plan did. The streetscape is less active due to more street level parking within the structures. The street typologies have not been adequately followed. STAFF REPORT Page 11 2. The proposed project would not meet the criteria for Rezoning to PUD. 3. The proposed building height is too tall compared to the previously approved project for the site, and there is not an adequate setback to Gallagher Drive. Approval Recommend the City Council approve the request for Zoning Ordinance Amendment and new Overall Development Plan for PUD-16. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal still meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high-quality architectural brick, metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed in Phase 1 would be the only buildings built on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Phase 2 would be required to be multi-family residential with some retail commercial as long as there is adequate parking on the site for all phases. d. Project would add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 10% of the units in Phase 2 for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. g. Meet the City’s sustainability policy, including seeking a LEED certified building in Phase 1. h. Provide 19% of the site for public use. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The plans address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines as follows: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and connections through the site both east-west and north-south; increasing the public realm on the site; eliminating most of the surface parking stalls, with none being visible from France Avenue in the Phase 2 build out. Affordable housing should be required within the future apartment project as well as public art located along France Avenue 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan:  Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail). STAFF REPORT Page 12  Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment.  Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces.  Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways.  Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets.  Provision of the north-south public vehicle, bike and pedestrian connection through the site.  Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change.  Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base.  Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.  Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region.  Ensure that the city’s roads continue to evolve to act as connectors, rather than as barriers. Incorporate amenities and infrastructure into public corridors to make them beautiful, efficient, and multimodal public spaces that contribute to community identity and pride.  50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use. 6. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Stantec conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated August 28, 2022. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final STAFF REPORT Page 13 Approval. 8.Phase 2 of the project must include affordable housing within the project, compliant with the City’s affordable housing policy. Final determination to be made at final approval for Phase 2. 9.Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated September 1, 2022. 10.Compliance with the Stantec Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11.Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12.Public sidewalks must be a minimum of 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard on Gallagher Drive and West 72nd Street, and 8 feet minimum width with an 8-foot boulevard on France Avenue. 13.Dedication of public access easements of the east-west and north-south sidewalks and drive- aisles through the site and sidewalks around the perimeter of the site. 14.Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 15.Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 16.The property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of internal sidewalks and drive aisles. The City would snow plow a 5-foot path of the sidewalk on France. The property owners would be responsible for the remaining areas. 17.Public art should be provided along street frontages and the courtyard. 18.Final Plans shall comply with the street typologies in the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines along France Avenue and the building step in at least ten feet at the 60-foot building height. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City decision: November 1, 2022 DATE: 9/1/2022 TO: 7200 – 7250 France Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer Mattias Oddsson, Engineering Services Intern Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager RE: 7200 – 7250 France Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, and survey drawings dated 8/1/2022. Additional staff comments on transportation elements are attached. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction, including xyz coordinates for storm, water, and sanitary infrastructure. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Staff has had discussions with the Sunrise Senior Living facility north of the project area. They have concerns with noise and vibrations and the effect on their residents. Communication with them will be required to better understand their concerns. Survey 3. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Update existing private easement regarding drainage as needed. Provide City a copy if updated. Grading/Building Permit 3.2 Provide easement over Danila St. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 4. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 5. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 6. Public sidewalks to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard on Gallagher Drive and West 72nd Street and 8’ minimum width with 8’ boulevard on France Avenue. Grading/Building Permit 7. Consider narrowing north-south access road to 12’ lanes to create a wider (8’-10’) shared-use path on the west side of access road instead of east side across the 7250 France parcel. General Comment 8. Increase width of sidewalk to 8’ minimum or 10’ preferred for west sidewalk across 7200 France to create a shared-use route or a West Promenade. General Comment 9. On-site sidewalks are the responsibility of the property owner to maintain, including snow plowing. City will maintain sidewalks adjacent to France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. General Comment 10. Consider relocating access road medians to pedestrian crossing to serve as refuge island. General Comment 11. Consider covered outdoor bike parking and dedicated bike parking with underground garage. General Comment Traffic and Street 12. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 13. Provide traffic study and implement City-approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 14. Driveway entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Add pedestrian ramps. Comply with standard plates 410 and 415. Building Permit 15. Road patching shall conform to Edina standard plates 540 and 543 on Gallagher Dr and 540 and 545 on 72nd St W. Comply with County requirements for France Ave S. Certificate of Occupancy 16. Proposed France Avenue lighting must remain consistent with Canto light fixtures and be the responsibility of the property owner. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 17. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 18. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 19. A looped watermain to the 72nd street right of way to create a public loop is required. Developer should create plan to serve future 7200 building with private main and City will pay oversize to create 8” consistent with City of Edina Water Supply Plan (SEH 2018) The 8” could be phased with any requirements for developer improvements on 72nd street, or stubbed to the right of way and finished with a future City lead improvement. 20. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 21. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 21.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 21.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 22. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 23. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 24. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 25. Verified well of unknown status located onsite at 7200 France Ave S. Provide well sealing record. Wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 26. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 27. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 28. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 29. Provide high points at/near property lines to verify runoff from both W 72nd St. and France Avenue are eliminated (at permit and with final as-built survey). Grading/Building Permit 30. Existing basin LE_20 flood elevation appears to be lowered by this proposal through the creation of additional flood storage. This basin has the potential to have extended inundation of stormwater in flood events. Confirm that building lowest floor elevation will be a minimum of 2’ above the 100-year HWL of basin. -or- Applicant to request a site-specific standard with engineer to provide groundwater analysis (or confirm that WD standard is properly used) to confirm that flood exposure does not exist, or inform the vulnerability reducing measures such as floodproofing of the underground parking lot (CWRMP Section 3.1.2.2). Grading/Building Permit 31. Infiltration basins are proposed on a site with MPCA hazardous waste and underground tanks listed. Refer to MNR000018127 and TS0019522 and MNR000017855. Confirm soil remediation meets MPCA/MDH Guidance to allow soil infiltrating features. Nine Mile Creek WD permit review should specifically address this issue. Grading/Building Permit 32. These sites are served by a private lift station and the downstream stormwater system has limited capacity. Rate will be limited to 0.5 cfs or existing conditions, whichever is less. Current plan meets this requirement through replacement of private station. Provide city with documentation of ownership and responsible party for maintenance of private lift station. Grading/Building Permit 33. The 7200 property provides conveyance of stormwater and flood storage for adjacent properties to the south through three private easements noted on ALTA title survey. Review legal obligations of easement and propose update that are acceptable to each property. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 34. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 35. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 36. Developer is responsible for maintaining temporary open green space on 7200 France Ave S in Phase 1A. General 37. Suggest temporary/permanent railing along sidewalks with steep slopes adjacent. 38. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Grading/Building Permit 39. Provide an existing condition survey (e.g. video or thorough photography) of ROW around the sites. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 40. Project must follow Sustainable Buildings Policy General Other Agency Coordination 41. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 42. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit 43. Impacts to France Avenue and France Avenue ROW will require Hennepin County permits. Grading/Building Permit Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 45.00 ° Inside Cramp Angle: 81.92 in.Axle Track: 5.25 in.Wheel Offset: 16.60 in.Tread Width: 65.99 in.Chassis Overhang: 258.00 in.Wheelbase: 20 ft. 4 in.Inside Turn: 36 ft. 8 in.Curb to Curb: 41 ft. 1 in.Wall to Wall: Parameters: Calculated Turning Radii: Comments: Truck 12205 Additional Bumper Depth: 19.00 in. Axle Track Tread WidthChassis Overhang Wheelbase Inside Turning Radius Wheel Offset Cramp Angle Additional Bumper Depth Curb to Curb Turning Radius W all to W all Turning R adius 84.99 in.Front Overhang Components Front Tires Chassis Front Bumper Aerial Device Tires, Michelin, 425/65R22.50 20 ply XZY 3 tread Dash-2000, Chassis, PAP/SkyArm/Midmount Bumper, 19" extended, Imp/Vel xxxAerial, 100' Pierce Platform PRIDE #Description 0078244 0070220 0123625 0006900 Notes: Actual Inside Cramp Angle may be less due to highly specialized options. Curb to Curb turning radius calculated for a 9.00 inch curb. Page 1 of 2 Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 Definitions: Inside Cramp Angle Maximum turning angle of the front inside tire. Axle Track King-pin to king-pin distance of the front axle. Wheel Offset Offset from the center-line of the wheel to the king-pin. Tread Width Width of the tire tread. Chassis Overhang Distance from the center-line of the front axle to the front edge of the cab. This does not include the bumper depth. Additional Bumper Depth Depth that the bumper assembly adds to the front overhang. Wheelbase Distance between the center lines of the vehicle's front and rear axles. Inside Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle around which the vehicle can turn. Curb to Curb Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the vehicle's tires can turn. This measurement assumes a curb height of 9 inches. Wall to Wall Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the entire vehicle can turn. This measurement takes into account any front overhang due to the chassis, bumper extensions and/or aerial devices. Page 2 of 2 Widen sidewalk to 8’ shared-use path to form part of West Promenade Narrow north-south street to discourage through traffic Remove sharrows, encourage cyclists to use off-street facility Remove sidewalk between drive lanes Relocate median to serve as pedestrian refuge island Consider covered outdoor bike parking Consider dedicated bike parking within underground garage 7200-7250 France Site Plan: Staff Comments on Transportation Elements RESOLUTION NO. 2022-81 APPROVING A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND REVISED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR 7250 AND 7200 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Orion Investment is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for a completely new redevelopment project for the subject property. This site received a rezoning approval to Planned Unit Development-16 in 2019; however, the project was never constructed. The underlying, or previous zoning on the site is POD, Planned Office District. The existing PUD would allow two six-story buildings with 299 unit of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants and 10 owner occupied townhomes. The previous POD, Planned Office District would allow 113,000 square feet of office/medical office use. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 44, Block I, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. The North 325 Feet of the East 520 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Except Road. (7200 & 7250 France. 1.03 The existing office buildings and parking ramp on the sites would be removed. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. The project would be developed in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a five-story 124,620 square foot office building and coffee shop with underground parking at the 7250 France Site. The 7200 site would include a ponding area, sidewalks, green space, landscaping and surface parking where the future building pad would be. 1.04 Phase 2 would include a similar sized building in height and square footage, with the future use of housing with retail (150 units). Permanent parking for Phase 1 would be required to be included in the Phase 2 development. 1.05 An Overall Development and Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD-16 District were approved by the City Council on April 2nd, 2019. 1.06 To accommodate the request, the following is requested:  A Rezoning/Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District to establish a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan review for Phase 1. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-81 Page 2 1.07 On September 14, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the request with the added condition that the bike and pedestrian connections be separated from the north/south street/connector. Vote: 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.08 On September 20th, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. 1.09 On October 6, 2022, the City Council granted approval of the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal still meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high-quality architectural brick, metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed in Phase 1 would be the only buildings built on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Phase 2 would be required to be multi-family residential with some retail commercial as long as there is adequate parking on the site for all phases. d. Project would add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 10% of the units in Phase 2 for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. g. Meet the City’s sustainability policy, including seeking a LEED certified building in Phase 1. h. Provide 19% of the site for public use. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The plans address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines as follows: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and connections through the site both east-west and north- south; increasing the public realm on the site; eliminating most of the surface parking stalls, with none being visible from France Avenue in the Phase 2 build out. Affordable housing should be required within the future apartment project as well as public art located along France Avenue 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-81 Page 3  Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail).  Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment.  Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces.  Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways.  Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets.  Provision of the north-south public vehicle, bike and pedestrian connection through the site.  Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change.  Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base.  Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.  Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region.  Ensure that the city’s roads continue to evolve to act as connectors, rather than as barriers. Incorporate amenities and infrastructure into public corridors to make them beautiful, efficient, and multimodal public spaces that contribute to community identity and pride.  50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use. 6. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Stantec conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves The Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan and Site Plan Amendment for PUD- 16. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated August 28, 2022. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-81 Page 4 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Phase 2 of the project must include affordable housing within the project, compliant with the City’s affordable housing policy. Final determination to be made at final approval for Phase 2. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated September 1, 2022. 10. Compliance with the Stantec Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Public sidewalks must be a minimum of 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard on Gallagher Drive and West 72nd Street, and 8 feet minimum width with an 8-foot boulevard on France Avenue. 13. Dedication of public access easements of the east-west and north-south sidewalks and drive- aisles through the site and sidewalks around the perimeter of the site. 14. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 15. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 16. The property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of internal sidewalks and drive aisles. The City would snow plow a 5-foot path of the sidewalk on France. The property owners would be responsible for the remaining areas. 17. Public art should be provided along street frontages and the courtyard. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-81 Page 5 18. Final Plans shall comply with the street typologies in the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines along France Avenue and the building step in at least ten feet at the 60-foot building height. 19. The bike and pedestrian connections be separated from the north/south street/connector on the west side of the proposed buildings. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 6, 2022. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 6, 2022, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION October 6, 2022 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2022-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-16, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-16 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-16 (PUD-16) (a) Legal description: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. The North 325 Feet of the East 520 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Except Road. (7200 & 7250 France Avenue) (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on February 27, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2019-23 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Townhomes/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD-2 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – France Front – Gallagher Front – 72nd Street (apartments) Front – 72nd Street (townhomes) Side – West (townhomes) Side – West (apartments) 39 feet 20 feet 25 feet 35 feet 20 feet 90 feet 45 feet Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 Building Height 6 stories and 67 feet 84 feet (Building to be constructed per the approved plans) Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.8% Parking Stalls 590 stalls required (Per the approved plans) Phase 1 – 317 total stalls Phase 2 – 468 total stalls Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD Zoning District based on the use. (h) Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units in the building shall be dedicated for affordable housing at 60% or less of area median gross income, for a minimum of 25 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. (h) Affordable housing units must be included in the project with the development of housing in Phase 2 per the City’s affordable housing policy at the time of final approval for Phase 2. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon second reading of the Ordinance. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 7200 & 7250 France P.U.D. Application Narrative 8/29/2022 Detailed project narrative explaining the proposed plans This project’s goal is to transform a dilapidated and historically problematic site into a thriving center for business and community activity. Development of this site has the potential to create 450-600 jobs when assuming 3-4 per 1,000 sf in jobs The extreme grade change within the site, paired with the requirement to address the 100-year flood stormwater needs for the adjacent area, provided numerous challenges to the project team. However, we were able to use these challenges to our advantage by working with the existing grade, keeping podium heights human-scaled and at street level, and incorporating ramps and stairs for improved pedestrian circulation while the roadway remains safely shared between bikes and vehicles. Below is a summary of the proposed project’s metrics compared to the previously approved PUD (Ordinance No. 2018-15_PUD-16) on the same site. · Building Height o Previously approved maximum PUD building height: 88’-6” feet above Gallagher with 7 stories o Proposed maximum PUD building height: 84’-0” above Gallagher (see Site Section Comparison diagram for reference). · Gross Floor Area (GFA) o Previously approved GFA: - Residential: 323,690 (6 floors) - Retail: 29,300 (1 floor) - Parking: 132,842 (2 floors) o Proposed GFA of 7250 (calculated per City of Edina’s definition): - General Office: 124,620 (5 floors) - Parking: 97,080 (2 floors below grade) · Parking Metrics o Previously approved parking total: 590 stalls o Proposed parking: - 7250 France (Phase 1A) - On grade: 15 stalls - Below grade: (P1: 110 ) + (P2: 109) = 219 stalls - Total 7250 parking: 234 stalls - 7200 France - (Phase 1B): 83 temporary parking stalls - (Phase 2): approx. 234 enclosed - Total 7200 parking: 317 stalls (pending final design) - 7200 + 7250 Totals by Phase - Total Phase 1A: 234 parking stalls - Total Phase 1B: (234 + 83) = 317 parking stalls - Total Phase 2: potentially 468 (pending final design for 7200) The proposed uses · 7250 France: o General Office o Retail (approximately 2,000 SF) · 7200 France: o Mixed use to potentially include to following: - 150 Dwelling Units - 5 Story Building - Residential: ~150,000 GFA - Retail Proposed public easements · France Ave setback becomes pedestrian corridor with landscaped paths, treescapes, and seating areas. · Stormwater retention basin with landscaped paths and overlooks on west side of site. · Danila Street becomes pedestrian-only corridor connected by ADA-compliant ramps and paths throughout entirety of site. How a PUD is justified with this proposal Per Sec 36-253 of City of Edina Zoning code: · sustainable design: 7250 will pursuing LEED certification; sustainable efforts include energy efficient MEP systems, reduced landscape irrigation needs through use of native/drought tolerant plantings, reduced light pollution, EV charging capacity, among other efforts. · Landscaping design creates attractive public amenities for the surrounding community; Danila Street provides a courtyard that can be utilized for accessible pedestrian access to on-site businesses during the day and then utilized for community events in the evening. The proposed storm-water basin incorporates public viewing and seating areas along with ADA accessible pathways across the site. France Ave setback becomes pedestrian corridor with landscaped paths, treescapes, and seating areas. · stormwater management: new storm-water basin has been designed to address the historically problematic storm water issues on site while also transforming it into a public amenity with overlooks, seating areas, and landscaped paths. The basin public amenity area is sunken below street level to provide a peaceful respite from the streetscape, immersed in a natural setting. · Total drainage area addressed with this design: 350,232 sf, including 43,451sf of adjacent residential lots, and 104,076sf from 7300 Gallagher. · pedestrian-oriented design: provides a human-scaled street grid by introducing Danila Street at the midpoint of the site, a pedestrian-only path with ADA-compliant ramps, stairs, benches and landscaping from France to the new North-South local street and to the new storm-water basin public nature area on the west side of the site. · transition to residential neighborhoods: by locating the buildings along the east side of site adjacent to France, the density is located away from the adjacent residential buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is lower or similar to the previously approved PUD; proposed building heights provide a more gradual transition from the residential neighborhoods in the west to the commercial center located to the east across France Ave. How the phasing will work · Phase 1A (baseline assumption) o 7250 France: Site prep and building construction. o 7200 France (west side of site): will become open greenspace as a temporary condition until design for 7200 development is finalized. o 7200 France (east side of site): will be developed to meet anticipated stormwater needs for both parcels in their developed form with a vegetated stormwater detention basin along the west side of the site. Area designed with careful intention to become a community asset by providing an accessible and beautiful natural area with paths, overlooks, and seating. o New North-South local street: will create the north-south multi-modal connection providing direct shared vehicle and bike corridor from Gallagher to 72nd street; the north-south pedestrian connection occurs closer to the buildings in order to provide a safer, more welcoming, and ADA-compliant path than would otherwise would have been possible with the extreme grade change of the existing site. o New East-West pedestrian street – Danila St: will provide ADA-compliant path that connects pedestrian traffic from France Ave across site. Designed to become an extension of the ground level building amenities and retail with entries and seating that spill out onto the public plaza. Which phase? o France Ave frontage: will provide fully landscaped greenspace and hardscaped pedestrian plaza along the entirety of the 50’ setback fronting both 7200 and 7250. · Phase 1B o Phase 1A is ongoing. o Pending finalization of tenant types at 7250, supplementary parking for that building can be provided on existing surface lot portion of 7200. This would be a temporary condition until 7200 is developed. When the 7200 building is completed, it will provide similar quantities and distribution of parking as the 7250 building. Development of 7200 and the resulting total parking counts will meet the City of Edina’s requirements. · Phase 2 o 7200 France (east side of site): Site prep and building construction. The building at 7200 will be of similar height and size of the 7250 building. 7200 France will similarly contain enclosed parking so that the majority of parking is not visible from surrounding areas. The remaining areas of the site are to remain as developed in previous phases. Bullet point summary of how you have implemented recommendations from the sketch plan review (what changes have been made to the plans) · Address the West Promenade Street Room typology 1A: o Incorporated multi-modal local street in north-south direction - Bikes and vehicles share this street with striped bike lanes and vegetated median strip. - Due to extreme grade changes, the street itself was not determined to be appropriate location for pedestrians to share; pedestrian paths are closer to proposed buildings for safety and accessibility. o West 72 ½ street (AKA Danila Street) - Developed to become a pedestrian-only public realm and a network of accessible green spaces with art located at intersection with France. · Building scale and fenestration: o “75% of building walls to be at setback line to support creation of street room” - When considering Danila Street as “street” as defined by the applicable typologies, the proposed buildings meet this requirement. o “All building façades are prime (including parking) and must be designed accordingly. There is no back side of a building. “ - Removed grocery store from program – all facades of proposed building have been carefully considered as prime with mix of human-scaled glazing and natural materials. o “All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials facing the public realm.” - Natural materials have been selected for portions of all facades within first 60 feet of building above grade. o “The landscape of the West Promenade should reinforce the characteristics of the neighborhood: tree lined to make sidewalks pleasant and safe to be on, creating a green vertical street room that is always pleasant to walk down” - Danila Street connects the greater Southdale district through this site with a pedestrian-scaled greenway featuring a mix of native landscape, paths with seating, and spaces primed for community events and art installations. This path connects further west to the beautified retention basin nature area, and to the north-south accessible pedestrian path connecting 72nd Street to Gallagher. Cary: At your request, we reviewed the PUD submission for the proposed redevelopment of 7200-7250 France Avenue South based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for how their guiding principles may translate to the built environment. The resulting vision for development in the district is to create an enhanced human experience along existing major and new connector streets, with overall experience shaped via landscape setbacks, building step backs, a hierarchy of street typologies, transparency at street level, minimizing the impact of the car, and managing storm water as an amenity. The outcome of our collaborations with the Work Group is described in the urban design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan and resulted in the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines (DEG). The DEG were developed with the understanding that larger sites may yield multiple blocks to be developed, potentially with infill projects that follow the initial phase of development. Every site has a program that is relevant to its own successful operations, and should stay within that footprint to ensure flexibility for future adjacent infill development. On grade parking is strongly discouraged – particularly a full block of on-grade parking. Unless all of a site’s parking and broader site infrastructure needs are addressed in the first phase of a PUD, we believe it is in the best interest of both the developer and the City for each block to be independently developed – without program needs for one site being accommodated on an adjacent one. This means that in the future there is not a conflict that would inhibit a site to be fully realized. The proposed phasing of this master plan, especially as it relates to parking, blurs this line and makes us uncertain of the site’s future flexibility. This particular site is unique in that it is influenced by four street typologies (Typology 1: Promenades and Transition Zones; Typology 2: Cornelia Overlay Zone; Typology 3: New Local Streets; Typology 5: Boulevards), which makes it more important that the development of each block be approached separately. Each façade of each block has a different role to play. And, each block has a different role to play in the larger development, the north half of this property has the retention pond; this should be a different consideration than the south half. The master plan should be clear about those distinctions, but in this case the master plan for the PUD is not clear as there is not a clear division between the two blocks. The woonerf experience illustrated in this proposal offers no transparency into buildings, but rather views of blank walls, lots of stairs, ramping, a parking access door, a typical ramped parking entry, and no pedestrian sidewalk. All we can imagine is that approach would be duplicated in the design framework for Phase 2. These elements are not in the Design Experience Guidelines for a reason. To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date August 10, 2022 Page 2 of 4 The kind of space they create is not human-centric, does not promote equity of experience, and does not encourage people to ‘come to and stay at’ a place. The following comments and questions are intended to guide clarification from the applicant as to why this is the best solution for this site, located at a very important gateway at Gallagher and France and a transition into the neighborhood to the west. Site Topography and Building Organization Throughout the report, and by example, the PUD submission itself, it is mentioned that the grades on the site are extreme. The existing topography is 10-20 feet below the level of the surrounding grades. However, when one considers Gallagher Drive (elevation 859’ per ESG drawings) and West 72nd Street (elevation 855’ per ESG drawings), and the south floor elevation of the proposed new Phase 1 entry (beginning at 857’ per ESG drawings), this represents a 3-4 foot difference across the site’s north-south axis, which stretches 560 feet—making the experience of walking around the site on West 72nd, France and Gallagher Drive a relatively flat one. The DEG goal was to use the woonerf as the fourth street that connects Gallagher to 72nd (3-4 foot difference in elevation) to make it easy and comfortable for bicycle and pedestrian use. Filling in the empty holes left by the previous buildings with below-grade parking would bring the grade of all of the building footprints up to street level, allowing that to be the starting point for vertical construction. The woonerf would be a true woonerf (ADA compliant) and would be constructed roughly at the same grade as France Avenue. The exterior car ramps, parking garage access doors, stairs, and ADA ramps shown in this proposal all seem unnecessary in a phased master plan for this site. Transition to Residential Neighborhood The DEG goal is not to move density away from the adjacent neighborhoods but to create a transition that is framed by the scale of the neighborhood. In this part of the district, one-, two-, or three-story buildings are envisioned to be fronting on a street (West Promenade), defined as a woonerf – meaning combined pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles with pedestrians having the greatest influence. New buildings on the east side of the woonerf would then be scaled to transition from the West Promenade in the form of stepbacks. In this proposal, above the proposed 24-foot first floor at the edge of the woonerf, the building could step back to the proposed final height of the building. This would comply with the spirit of the DEG and meet the characteristics of the woonerf as a transition street within the Cornelia Overlay Zone. Proposed Danila Street The DEG recognizes the space between buildings can provide more opportunities for expanding the public realm and in some cases, to introduce pedestrian-oriented streets into sites. There are other options such as woonerfs (reduced thru traffic, pedestrians and bicycles having priority) and an opportunity to create – by linking multiple blocks together – a network of pedestrian-oriented pathways throughout the district. However, in this instance, using Danila as a pedestrian-only space may create limitations in how the street network, with the addition of the West Promenade, may evolve in the future. This is discussed further under Phasing, on the following page. (Woonerfs are ADA compliant by design if they are to accommodate all residents and visitors equitably.) Proposed Stormwater Retention Basin It is unclear what the variation in the basin water level will be from day to day, or after a heavy rain event, so as an amenity it might have restrictions that would need to be clearer if it were to become a valued part of community infrastructure. We also note that the use of sunken gardens in urban settings has historically been mixed, with their location below street level leaving many people feeling unsafe for use as part of daily life. Page 3 of 4 Observations on Phasing a. Woonerfs are shared streets with pedestrians having precedence over vehicles. Generally, vehicles move through the street at approximately 5 miles per hour. The City of Edina already has an example of this type of space in the Nolen Mains development at 50th and France. The DEG’s use of woonerfs on both the East and West Promenades is to provide a physical redefinition of the street to become pedestrian and bicycle oriented, with vehicular traffic to serve new development. The woonerf becomes the primary element in organizing transition zone spaces that link the entire Southdale district from north to south. New buildings are intended to frame and characterize the woonerf as a safe pedestrian environment. They are intended to house new services that support the neighborhood, along with new commercial programs that create an experience that is shared between building occupants and residents of the adjacent neighborhoods. The ‘woonerf’ illustrated in this proposal is essentially a parking garage entry ramp with trees in the middle of the road with no pedestrian access. As it relates to PUD phasing, if Phase 1 of this proposal were to be a self-contained development as described above (i.e. not dependent on any use of the Phase 2 site to meet its program/parking needs), the south half of the woonerf would be constructed as part of Phase 1, with Danila Street completing the woonerf and providing access to below-grade parking. A future Phase 2 would complete the north half of the woonerf and share parking access to below-grade parking from Danila Street with Phase 1. b. It is unclear how the future Phase 2 will work if its site is developed initially with a 115-car surface parking lot dedicated to meet the parking requirements/program of Phase 1. Given that the construction duration for new buildings is generally 2-3 years, approximately one- third of Phase 1’s parking would be taken out of commission during that time. The DEG recommends no new on-grade parking in the district. It also intends that each building takes care of its own services, parking, etc. The hybrid approach outlined in this submission puts restrictions or a possible future covenant on development of the north parcel based on its proposed initial use as a surface parking lot. Should this 115-car surface lot be necessary to meet the required parking counts for Phase 1, it seems highly unlikely that this important gateway site into the Cornelia neighborhood would ever be developed beyond a surface lot that is more than 10 feet below the level of surrounding sidewalks. Also of note, this surface lot is accessed solely via a ramp down from 72nd Street, not from the “woonerf” roadway shown in the proposal. c. It is unclear from the information provided whether the two below-grade parking levels are interconnected within the Phase 1 building or if the access to Phase 1 parking is via the surface lot. Should the latter be the case, the construction of Phase 2 may limit access to one level of Phase 1 parking—which again, could be an impediment to future development of the site. Other details not addressed: a. A building service plan has not been discussed; no building facades or plans show service access point beyond parking access. The Design Experience Guidelines provide considerations into the how the form of buildings and width of streets impact the public realm. As it relates to buildings, important factors influencing the experience in the public realm include the transparency of walls at the ground floor, and the location of drop offs and parking entries, service vehicle access, and on-site utility equipment–all of which, if not taken into consideration at the earliest in the Page 4 of 4 sketch plan and reflected in all phases of the review process, can become unwanted surprises in the later phases of design and construction. Additional questions we would encourage the applicant and the Planning Commission/City Council to consider addressing include:  On grade parking is expressly discouraged in the Design Experience Guidelines. Why does the current plan ignore this important guideline?  Each building should be able to meet its own internal parking requirements and not depend on on-grade parking or district parking. Why does the current plan use on-grade parking to meet parking needs for a Medical Office Building in Phase 1?  In this proposal, there is no discussion about the possibility of extending below grade parking or basements under the public realm/streets (the woonerf) as an option to expand the parking footprint without creating a surface lot.  Has the applicant considered adding a level of parking above the ground floor of Phase 1 to meet all of that building’s parking requirements within its site constraints without limiting future flexibility of the north parcel? This is a common way to increase parking on a site when there are limitations to below-grade parking.  District parking, as the on-grade parking implies, should be reserved for districtwide needs, not those of individual buildings. Is District Parking part of the proposal?  Why does the north elevation not show the full depth of the surface parking lot below France?  Why is there extensive investment being made in the North on-grade parking lot, to be removed by a future Phase 2?  Why are the sites for Phase 1 and Phase 2 connected by a series of 3 ramps that descend 15 feet down from Gallagher into a surface parking lot and access to 2 levels of below grade parking before ascending back out to W. 72nd Street?  We understand that Phase 2 is not designed, but it is unclear how the applicant would reach 501 parking stalls, unless they envision adding a P3 level to the Phase 2 project? In addition, based on the sections provided, it appears that Phase 2 ground floor would be constructed approximately three feet above grade on 72nd Street.  Why is the roadway not a woonerf as described in the DEG for the West Promenade?  Why are there no provisions for pedestrians on the proposed west roadway – only bicycles and cars?  Is the road there to only provide access to the Phase 1 below grade parking and on grade parking and (potential) Phase 2 below-grade parking?  What is the strategy for building services – loading dock, garbage and recycling, medical wastes (assuming a medical office building), access from the public realm, etc.? Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic EdinaMN.gov 2 Site Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site INFILTRATION BASIN #1 SIDEWALKEASEMENT, TYP.DROP OFF AREAXref C:\Users\jcoryell\AppData\Roaming\Autodesk\AutoCAD 2022\R24.1\enu\XCompareBackup\ARCH\2022-06-23\22-0622 7250 Phase 1 Site Plan Export.dwg I A A A A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B B B B B B BB B B B B B C C C C D D D D E E E E E E F F B F F F G G G G G G G G H H J J J J KK D L L L L L L L L A A B A WALK C RETAINING WALL D E F BENCH FEATURES G WASTE AND RECYCLING H BIKE RACKS I J SCULPTURAL/ ART MOMENT PLAN KEYNOTES: B PLANTING BED K STAIR W/HANDRAILS L SIGNAGE TABLE AND CHAIRS NATIVE VEGETATION / SEED DECORATIVE PAVING / ROCK MATERIAL ENTRY MOTORCOURT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 7200 FUTUREMOTORCOURT OVERLOOKFEATURE PUBLICART /ELEMENTCOURTYARD LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN01L1.0 20'40'10'0' SCALE:1"=20'L1.0 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 22113 JC TM 7200-7250 7200-7250 France AvenueSouth, Edina, MN No. Description Date P.U.D.SUBMISSION 08/12/2022 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.com INFILTRATION BASIN 7250DEVELOPMENT COURTYARD COURTYARD Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments-7200 and 7250 France Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 7200 and 7250 France Avenue VISITORS 40 CONTRIBUTORS 11 RESPONSES 11 1 Registered 0 Unverified 10 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 10 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 22, 2022 14:42:55 pm Last Seen:Aug 22, 2022 14:42:55 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Melinda Emerson Q2.Address 7124 Heatherton Trl Q3.Comment I don't understand why they are putting surface area parking at 7200 if it won't be there long term and there is ramp parking available. We should be avoiding traffic on 72nd. Make it a wild flower garden for now. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 29, 2022 09:00:38 am Last Seen:Aug 29, 2022 09:00:38 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name robert and linda carlson Q2.Address 5250 grandview sq. unit 2105 edina mn 55436 Q3.Comment This proposal is a great use of the property -. It provides much needed residential and office needs in this location.. It is proposed by a quallty developer who has recently completed other successful projects within the City. He has proven his word is his bond. His developments have todays look and quality above the norm. Suggest this be expedited in a timely manner. Consternation of any kind should be limited. Thanks for the opportunity to respond. Live in Edina for 12 years. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 01, 2022 06:57:40 am Last Seen:Sep 01, 2022 06:57:40 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Linda Carlson Q2.Address 5250 Grandview Square, #2105, Edina. 55436 Q3.Comment I think this proposal is perfect for that location. The developer has an excellent history in our wonderful city and can be relied upon to do an outstanding job on a timely basis. We would hope the city grants approval without much consternation. The sooner that building is completed the better. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 12, 2022 09:00:02 am Last Seen:Sep 12, 2022 09:00:02 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Lorenzo Bassi Q2.Address 6337 Mildred Avenue, Edina, MN 55439 Q3.Comment This looks like a great project, and one that would help the area thrive. I believe the idea of having both an office building and a quality apartment/retail complex in that space is a very good one. I look forward to seeing this project come to life. Regards, Lorenzo Bassi Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 12, 2022 11:30:26 am Last Seen:Sep 12, 2022 11:30:26 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Angela Chapman Q2.Address 5509 Parkwood lane Q3.Comment I am very excited to hear more about the building project at 7200 and 7250 France Ave EDINA. From what I have seen so far I think it will be an amazing improvement for that area! I am definitely for job creation and supporting ways to improve EDINA. I cant wait for the new buildings! Respondent No:6 Login:Stein Email:rstein8@msn.com Responded At:Sep 14, 2022 07:17:45 am Last Seen:Sep 16, 2022 15:23:07 pm IP Address:24.118.224.147 Q1.First and Last Name Richard Stein Q2.Address 7016 Bristol Blvd Q3.Comment What is expected Traffic plan? How will traffic to and from this building be managed/suppressed on 72 Street west of this building. How will maintenance noise from the building/parking areas be managed after hours to minimize impact on surrounding neighborhoods? How will ongoing heating/cooling noise of the building be suppressed to minimize impact on neighborhood. Is cut-through traffic expected on the property? Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 14, 2022 07:43:00 am Last Seen:Sep 14, 2022 07:43:00 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Lindsey Bowen Q2.Address 6512 Parkwood Road Q3.Comment What a wonderful development opportunity and addition to the Edina area. I have been to the current buildings before and it’s time to replace them with these new buildings and parking structures. I support this! Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 14, 2022 07:45:45 am Last Seen:Sep 14, 2022 07:45:45 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Zack Bowen Q2.Address 6512 Parkwood Road Q3.Comment This project would bring a much needed "face lift" to the dilapidated structure currently in existence. The design proposal is modern and focused on sustainability with hidden parking and storm water management. It would create more jobs in our city and I appreciate the inclusion of the pedestrian and bike connectivity which shows consideration for the broader community. I support this project. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 14, 2022 08:57:05 am Last Seen:Sep 14, 2022 08:57:05 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steve Brown Q2.Address 5524 Mirror Lakes Drive Q3.Comment I am a life long resident of the City of Edina and have a personal residence on Bristol Circle which is directly adjacent to this development. I was an Edina Planning Commission Member for 11 years, as well as a appointed by the City Council to be a member of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Committee that studied the Greater Southdale Area. Last, I was the appointed to Chair the West 70th Street I know this site and the proposed project intimately and am familiar with the various challenges and considerations that those that have evaluated it for redevelopment have had to address taking into account market conditions, the Cornelia neighborhood, the storm water issues, and the City of Edina's updated Comprehensive Plan. I am supportive of this project for a variety of reasons -Job creation - Revitalize a blighted corner - Pedestrian and bike connectivity - Stormwater management for a large area - Parking hidden underground - Sustainable and modern design Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 14, 2022 12:34:40 pm Last Seen:Sep 14, 2022 12:34:40 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jenifer Kent - Lund Real Estate Holdings Q2.Address 4100 West 50th Street Edina, MN, 55424 Q3.Comment Our major concern in regards to a development of this size is the dramatic change in the traffic at this intersection. We would ask that there be a traffic study to understand how the new PUD request would alter the traffic flow with new housing and retail. Also, we would ask that the parking of the site be addressed. Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 16, 2022 05:32:15 am Last Seen:Sep 16, 2022 05:32:15 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ryan Kirvida Q2.Address 5520 KNOLL DRIVE Q3.Comment This project would clearly improve the area from adding green space to improving pedestrian and bike connectivity, to improving the look and feel of the environment there. This will attract business and improve the local economy. Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue Height Diagram Comparison Height Diagram - CurrentEdina, MN November 7, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue Height Diagram 56' 56' 45'-5" 24'-5" 24'-5" 14' 14' 67'-5" 24'-5" 56' 24' 56'45'-5" 67'-5" 56' APPARENT HEIGHT 65'-5" DUE TO FIRST LEVEL BEING 2' BELOW FRANCE AVE AND GALLAGHER DR. Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue North East View •6th Floor @ 67’-5” •Full step back on 6th floor •Stone on street level •Brick added on upper levels CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue South East View •6th Floor @ 67’-5” •Full step back on 6th floor •Stone on street level •Brick added on upper levels CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue •6th Floor @ 67’-5” •Full step back on 6th floor •Stone on street level •partial Brick on upper levels South West View CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH 67'-5" 67'-5" 67'-5" 56'-0" 56'-0" 56'-0" 56'-0" Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue •6th Floor @ 67’-5” •Full step back on 6th floor •Stone on street level •Brick added on upper levels North West View 67'-5" 67'-5" 67'-5" 67'-5" 56'-0" 56'-0" CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue South East View •6th Floor @ 67’-5” •Full step back on 6th floor •Stone on street level •Brick added on upper levels CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page c APreface What are Design Experience Guidelines? Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page A1 For nearly four years, a Work Group comprised of Edina residents and business leaders contemplated the future evolution of the Greater Southdale District, using the notion of “experience” as the foundational element from which to shape the district over the next 50 years. The first phase of the Work Group’s efforts consisted of developing Working Principles that would guide the group’s efforts into subsequent stages as well as suggest a dialog for considering new introductions within the district. Phase Two translated these principles into an urban design framework plan that proposed enhanced connections across existing major streets, introduced a new block framework to encourage walkability, and posed design strategies to create an improved public realm and promote higher quality, pedestrian-oriented development. The broader experience the urban design framework strives to achieve is the creation of a Greater Southdale District that connects seamlessly between the existing urban and residential fabric, maximizes the development potential of each site, enhances walkability and livability, and encourages interaction among current and future residents, businesses, and institutions. The urban design framework is the foundation to the Greater Southdale District Plan, a part of the City of Edina 2018 Comprehensive Plan. The Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines is a companion to those documents, outlining high-level planning and design strategies for public realm, site, and building design supporting the desired experience outcomes. The Design Experience Guidelines sets baseline guidance for developers, designers, City of Edina staff, Planning Commissioners and members of the City Council when proposing, designing or evaluating proposed introductions within the Greater Southdale District. Use of the Design Experience Guidelines The Design Experience Guidelines apply to proposed development within the Greater Southdale District and former Pentagon Park, and should be referred to when embarking on new development or redevelopment. The Design Experience Guidelines also offer direction for new public realm features and the reimagining of existing public infrastructure. The document does not stand alone; it must be considered as part of a larger set of district goals, urban design framework and patterns, and policy guidance outlined in the Greater Southdale District Plan and the 2018 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. Together, these documents set forth A. Preface What are Design Experience Guidelines? Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page A2 City expectations for the future form of the Greater Southdale District, and inform all potential projects within the district. The Design Experience Guidelines are not a substitute for City of Edina zoning codes and ordinances, but instead provide substantial background for developers and design teams and a framework from which to approach proposed projects within the district. The Design Experience Guidelines clarify the dimensional characteristics of eight different Street Room typologies that together form the experience within the district. The physical qualities of each street room’s height and width, and shaped by the architecture of the district, informs the design of the public realm on streets that connect and bind the human experience of the district. These physical characteristics also shape the experience of transition – transitions from existing single-family neighborhoods and transitions into and out of the district, outlining gradual changes in building scale within these critical transition areas to bridge between one- and two-story residences and the greater intensity of the Greater Southdale District. In conjunction with the Urban Design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan, this document provides both a philosophical and practical framework to facilitate discussion among the City, development teams, and the community when considering proposals for change within the district. During the recommended Sketch Plan review process (described on page 70 of the Greater Southdale District Plan), the Design Experience Guidelines are intended to facilitate dialog about broader district goals, patterns and connections, building massing, programmatic opportunities and shared public realm connectivity. Dialog at this point in the review of a proposal requires imagination, looking beyond the immediate site to imagine the creation of a consistently positive human experience, requiring a proposal to recognize the ways in which it influences that experience on adjacent and nearby sites. Once a proposal progresses beyond the Sketch Plan, the document is used as a test of outcomes and touchstone to measure how every proposal meets the desired district experience. Further specific design details related to landscaping, curb and intersection design, stormwater management and daylighting, lighting standards, street furniture, and a host of other factors related to the experience of the district will be described in future versions of this or a similar document as the need for direction related to those features becomes better understood. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 2 2 The Vision Aspirations for the Greater Southdale District Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 3 Background and Context Collectively, for nearly four years, the Greater Southdale Area Work Group has focused on building upon our community’s history of innovation, engagement and community commitment to create a vision for the possibilities of the Greater Southdale District. This work has culminated in the Greater Southdale District Plan (adopted December 2018) and the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. Change is inevitable within the district. In the past five years alone, over 1,500 new housing units have been constructed or are underway, along with myriad other commercial projects. This is a tremendous opportunity in time, and in the broader evolution of our community. We can transform the physical environment of the Greater Southdale District from a traditional car-oriented suburban commercial district with its sea of surface parking lots and ‘superblocks,’ into a vibrant place whose character is neither urban nor suburban, but blends the best characteristics of both to create a place that is uniquely of Edina. This new model will support all modes of transportation (cars, buses, bikes, scooters, and pedestrians) and serve future generations of Edina residents, employers, and visitors. It will complement, not compete with, the single family neighborhoods that have historically defined much of the community’s fabric. Within the broader 750+ acre Greater Southdale District, and the former Pentagon Park, there exist a remarkable variety of assets. This plan connects those assets with a new street grid that overlays a human scale and allows access via a variety of transportation options. The plan sets forth a strategy to bridge between adjacent single family neighborhoods and the more commercially focused areas of the district. And, it uses public realm infrastructure— including parks, plazas, green streets, woonerfs, and waterways that manage stormwater—as the connective tissue that gives the district its unique identity. Together, these attributes will set the stage for a remarkable daily experience for those who live, work and play within the Greater Southdale District. Aspirations for the Future Greater Southdale District The Greater Southdale Work Group summarized the overall districtwide vision and land use strategies as part of the District Plan. These aspirations, which follow, are at the foundation of design policy parameters and the overall experience we are striving to shape as the Greater Southdale Area evolves over the next 50 years. 1. Imagine Greater Southdale District evolution organized around human activity, with vibrant pedestrian-focused streets, beautiful parks and public spaces, and endearing and enduring buildings where: • A sense of invention is expected from new introductions, both public and private, that build on the district’s spirit of innovation. • Its role as regional and local center for living, shopping, working, learning, entertainment, hospitality, and medical services is enhanced. • Other Edina neighborhoods, near and distant, benefit from investment in the district and the evolution of each parcel. • Investment in the public realm is reflected by a commensurate investment as private parcels evolve. • Public and civic services accommodate a growing and diverse district and community population. • Transitions at the district’s edges recognize compatible use and scale and neighboring uses are perpetuated on their terms. 2. The Vision The Greater Southdale District Experience Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 4 2. Make the Greater Southdale District the model of healthy urban living where: • The district’s form encourages healthy living habits, particularly through walking. • The design of buildings and spaces, both public and private, attract the widest possible range of the district’s population. • Storm water is a valued resource by making it part of the experience of the district. • Emissions and pollutants are mitigated through the introduction of significant tree canopy and limiting idling vehicles on streets, creating a more inviting walking experience along the district’s streets. • Sustainable solutions result in a stock of healthy buildings that compel healthy activity for their occupants. • Public features mitigate impacts of non-local infrastructure, especially to contain the ill effects of adjacent highways. 3. Invent sustainable infrastructure matching the district’s sense of innovation where: • Mutually-supportive and forward-looking infrastructure is the norm, looking beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create a broadly supportive district infrastructure. • Infrastructure aligns with the creation of public space in the district, sharing space and resources that result in compelling, attractive and high-functioning civic spaces. • Care for and perpetuation of public infrastructure anticipates daily human activity in all seasons. 4. Create neighborhoods of activity within the broader mixed-use patterns of the district where: • Logical boundaries based on reasonable walking distances are established, with major streets as seams binding the activity of each side into an inviting and accessible public space. • Focal points of public activity are found within each neighborhood. • Key community services and facilities are present and help define the fabric of the District. • Core services are delivered within each neighborhood or in an adjacent neighborhood. • Neighborhoods are linked along street and park corridors highlighted by visible human activity. 5. Offer a spectrum of living opportunities integrated through the district where: • Housing orients to a variety of income levels and household types. • Ownership options constitute a significant portion of the living opportunities in the area. • “Missing Middle” living opportunities (duplexes, triplexes, side-by-side or stacked townhouses, rowhouses with multiple units, and small buildings with four to six apartments) allow a broader range of Edina residents, workforce members and others to consider relocating to the District. • Buildings for living strongly orient to the public spaces of each neighborhood within the District. 6. Expand significantly the number and extent of parks and public spaces where: • Opportunities for the introduction of another large signature public space complement the programming and activities available at Centennial Lakes. • An extension of the Promenade to Strachauer Park links neighbors and activity to the district. • New promenades on the East and West edges of the District create movement corridors for pedestrians and bicyclists and serve as vital places for a transition between neighborhoods and the District. • Parks and publicly accessible spaces are clearly visible and directly accessible from the public realm. • Spaces for visible human activity and occupation, either public or publicly accessible, occur on every block. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 5 7. Encourage district evolution based on incremental change and the creation of a great pedestrian experience where: • A basic framework of streets and blocks encourages pedestrian activity and well-considered buildings. • A rich variety of public or publicly accessible spaces are woven into the experience of the district. • Sites and buildings support a pedestrian experience first, with storage of cars not a focus. • Development on each site links to adjacent streets and to neighboring sites to create continuous, safe, and inviting pedestrian experiences. 8. Build (or plan for) a street network encouraging pedestrian movement across and through the district where: • Walkable block lengths (200 feet) are the baseline framework for development. • Enhanced and more frequent street crossings facilitates pedestrian movement. • Wide landscaped boulevards encourage pedestrian activity and create a distinct district signature. • Community corridors within and extending well beyond the district enhance bicycle and pedestrian access while accommodating vehicle traffic on pedestrian terms. 9. Imagine transportation in the district where: • Cars are not the focus and streets accommodate more than vehicles. • Major streets balance access and mobility. • Some streets serve as community corridors, linking to other community destinations with features that allow for movement in addition to cars. • Transit is a baseline service, both within the district and to non-Edina locations. • Transportation recognizes trends, including autonomous vehicles and a time when parking structures aren’t needed for public parking 10. Expect the delivery of high quality, well-designed buildings and sites where: • Spaces on sites are considered for people first, including connections between sites; then the ways structures are placed; and then places to store cars are found. • Visible human activity is prominent and integrated at every site. • People are brought to the streets via major building entries oriented to major streets. • Storm water remains visible as an amenity, allowing it to become a central part of the experience of each site. 11. Frame development guidance for evolution where: • Development review includes the desired experience, not solely quantitative thresholds. • Accommodation of adjacent and near parcels are considered in the evolution of a single parcel. • Early reviews focus on ideas, patterns and relationships, not specific and engineered plans, with that part of the review process based in dialog, not presentation and reaction. • Demonstrations of quality and especially quality from a long-term perspective are baseline considerations. • Collaboration leads to a superior result, with the community’s expectations clearly framed as part of the deliberation. • Flexibility is not a right, but rather the natural by-product of a fair exchange for benefits, collaboration, and quality in development. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 18 STREET ROOM TYPOLOGIES A hierarchy of streets and pathways within the district is the framework for public realm development and related building form. Each street across the district has a role in how it serves pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles in connecting sub-districts, adjacent single family neighborhoods, and the overall Greater Southdale District and creating a unified sense of place. It is the intent that street typologies define the public realm experience: the space between buildings, dimensions of building setbacks from the street, heights of facades at the building face at the street and building step backs, where the façade of the building steps back from the volume of the street room. Street Room Typology 1: Promenades and Transition Zones Promenades are new woonerf-type streets on the west side of France Avenue and on the east side of York Avenue. Within this typology, there are several different variations for new building development in these important transition zones, responding to and respecting the context of adjacent single family neighborhoods. Street Room Typology 2: Cornelia Overlay Zone With the understanding that there is special sensitivity related to new building development near the Cornelia neighborhood, this is a special zone governing the design of the public realm/street room on the east side of France Avenue between the north side of 69th Street and Gallagher Drive. Buildings within this zone will be expected to maintain the east side of the France Avenue street room, but will be of a lower overall scale than new Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6 Central Promenade Spine 66TH STREETVALLEY VIEW RD.66TH STREET69TH STREET70TH STREETHAZELTON RD.GALLAGHER DRPARKLAWN AVE76TH STREET77TH STREETMINNESOTA DR72ND STREETEDINBOROUGH WAY YORK AVENUE FRANCE AVENUE XERXES AVENUE BARRIE RD78TH STREETN Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 20 The sub-district to the west side of France between 69th and Parklawn is a unique transition zone within the Greater Southdale District. Any proposed developments within this zone should be approached with special sensitivity. This means that the street experience within that zone should be perceived as connected to the Cornelia neighborhood through landscaping and trees, and buildings that gradually transition in both height and function and use between lower intensity neighborhoods to the more commercially-focused district on the east side of France Avenue. The West Promenade, a new north-south pedestrian, bike and vehicle street/woonerf that accommodates service access, is envisioned between France Avenue and the Cornelia neighborhood. This new shared street is intended to provide service access to new developments along France (keeping vehicular traffic out of single family neighborhoods), and providing a new framework to support the transition from townhouses and lower-scale residential buildings on the west side of the West Promenade, to slightly taller buildings on the east side of the West Promenade. Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 21 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood As illustrated in the section above, within this transition zone, building heights will step up incrementally, from those that are adjacent to single family homes to those that are facing France Avenue to provide a more gradual transition from the residential neighborhood to the more commercially-oriented Southdale District. The street room experience within Typology 1A will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • New buildings that are adjacent to single family residential properties, on the west side of the West Promenade, should not exceed 36 feet in height. Townhomes are the preferred residential typology in this area of the transition zone. • All ground level space east of the West Promenade should have 20-foot floor-to-floor height. This dimension allows for flexibility to accommodate one level of retail space along the street, or two-story townhomes facing the West Promenade. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • On the east side of the West Promenade, building faces should not exceed 50’ in height. Any height above that limit should step back 20 feet from the facade of the building. • On France Avenue, a 50 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a maximum building height of 60 feet. • On individual developments, should the City choose to permit height above the 60-foot height limit, it is recommended that additional height above 60 feet step back from the face of the building by a minimum of 10 feet in depth and 12 feet in height. Street Typologies West Promenade Transition to the Cornelia Neighborhood A “Woonerf” reallocates the public right-of-way to create a place for people and plantings while accommodating slow-moving vehicles. The street is elevated so it is flush with the sidewalk, allowing for a continuous walking surface. When the street is closed for public events such as a festival, the area becomes a public plaza. The proposed building setbacks and building step-backs are intended to create a gradual transition in use and scale from the existing Cornelia Neighborhood on the west to France Avenue to the east. Between a transitional Street “Woonerf” is used as both a collector for neighborhood needs and a barrier against additional vehicular traffic flowing into the neighborhood. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. With a perpetual festival permit in place, the street becomes a venue for community events such as salsa dancing, a wine crush or a pop-up playground. Within the district it is the intention to define a series of street rooms each having their own characteristics and connections to the existing neighborhoods and other parts of the district to enhance the experience of the pedestrian creating both a sense of place and safe environment to be in. The West Promenade is intended to be a pedestrian and bicycle collector between the existing residential neighborhood. A1 Traffic Lanes 50 Foot Setback France Avenue 50 Feet West Promenade “Woonerf” (60’ wide Street) Single Family ResidenceTownhouses 36 Feet maximum 20 Foot Step Back Mixed Use Buildings 60 Feet Maximum Neighborhood Street 15 Foot Front Yard Setback60 Feet Maximum Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 22 Street Room Typology 1B West Promenade Between Parklawn and Minnesota Drive South of the zone designated as Street Room Typology 1A (where the Cornelia transition area immediately abuts single family neighborhoods), the Street Room experience shifts to respond to its changing context. It becomes one that is more commercial in nature and in concert with the expected higher intensity in the southwest quadrant the Greater Southdale District. As the West Promenade extends south into Typology 1B, it continues to serve pedestrian, vehicular and service access. Uniform building heights on each side of the West Promenade are intended to support the transition from existing multi-family housing to taller buildings at the south end of France Avenue near the gateway from 494. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 23 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 1B West Side of France Between Parklawn and Minnesota Drive Within this zone, existing buildings are more commercial in nature and do not immediately abut single family neighborhoods. This unique condition lends itself to new development along the West Promenade that is still lower in scale, without the preference for townhomes or smaller scale buildings along one edge, as in Typology 1A. The street room experience within Typology 1B will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • Building faces at the West Promenade within Typology 1B shall not exceed 50 feet in height. Any height above that limit should step back 20 feet from the facade of the building. • All street level space shall be 20 feet, floor-to-floor in height. This dimension allows for flexibility for retail space (on France) and two-story townhomes facing the West Promenade. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • Building faces on the east side of the West Promenade are intended to provide continuity in scale and experience from Street Room Typology 1A and from one side of the street to another. West Promenade“Woonerf”(60’ wide Street) 20 Foot Step Back 50 Feet 20 Foot Step Back Street TypologiesWest Promenade A2 A “Woonerf” reallocates the public right-of-way to create a place for people and plantings while accommodating slow- moving vehicles. The street is elevated so it is flush with the sidewalk, allowing for a continuous walking surface. When the street is closed for public events such as a festival, the area becomes a public plaza. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. With a perpetual festival permit in place, the street becomes a venue for community events such as salsa dancing, a wine crush or a pop-up playground. 60 Feet 105 Feet 20 Foot Step Back 2 Foot Step Back Traffic Lanes 50 Foot Setback France Avenue 60 FeetMaximum Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 32 Street Room Typology 5 The Boulevards Streets that are included in this typology include the primary district boulevards such as France Avenue, York Avenue, W 66th Street and W 77th Street. In addition to being the widest streets in the district, they also currently carry a high volume of vehicular traffic. The intent of this typology is to create streets that connect the Greater Southdale District to the larger Edina community. These commercially-focused streets will reinforce the district’s unique role in serving Edina’s neighborhoods, while at the same time, recognizing that the district has a role in the broader metropolitan region—providing employment, health, retail, entertainment, and a wide range of housing options. The streets that fall into Typology 5 will have the greatest impact in conveying the overall identity of the district, with wide, multi-use streetscapes lined with a double row of trees within a consistent 50-foot setback. Medians may also be present in the boulevard streetscape to accommodate plantings and/or mass transit lines and stations. In many cases, boulevards will be adjacent to the tallest buildings in the district and will be the locations for transit stops. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 33 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 5 The Boulevards On these wide streets, a sense of scale is maintained by creating a uniform street wall of 60 feet, with taller structures stepping back from this 60-foot datum. This consistency in building heights along the street will form the edge of the street room—bridging between lower intensity and transitional areas, and the higher intensity zones within the Greater Southdale District. The street room experience within Typology 5 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • On France Avenue, a 50 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a minimum building height of 60 feet (diagram at left). Above that 60 foot height, the building face should step back two feet to create a cornice line, and can then extend to 105 feet. Above 105 feet, building faces must step back an additional 10 feet (as illustrated in diagram at right, above.) • Building podiums along these streets need to maintain as closely as possible the 60-foot height limit while still adhering to the guidance of 75% of building face at the setback line to create the fundamental experience of the street room. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • Parking and building services should not be accessed via these streets. • Incorporate 10- to 12-foot wide sidewalks that create opportunities for gathering, outdoor cafes, pavilions, etc. • Within the 50-foot setback, trees should be planted in a double row to add a strong canopy for pedestrian activity. Street Typologies Boulevards France Avenue, York Avenue, W 66th Streetand W 76th and W 77th: multi-modal thoroughfares within the Greater Southdale District. They have wide, multi-use streetscapes lined with a double row of trees. Medians may also be present in the Boulevard streetscape to accommodate plantings as well as mass transit lines and stations. In many cases, Boulevards will be adjacent to the tallest buildings in the district and will be the locations for transit stops. D A 50 feet setback is required from curb to face of building with minimum building height of 60 feet with a maximum building height of 105 feet. Any part of the building above 105 feet requires a 20 foot step back. Preferred building materials: Concrete, steel or heavy timber structural frame. 60 Feet 105 Feet 10 Foot Step Back 2Foot Step Back Traffic Lanes50 Foot Setback France AvenueFrance Avenue 60 Feet Traffic Lanes50 Foot Setback Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 36 5 Implementing and Measuring the Guidance Ten Things to Remember Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 37 1. Every new development begins with the 200’ x 200’ block, or some variation based on context. 2. Every block or building in a development will need streets to connect between buildings. Not all of these streets will need to accommodate vehicles, providing the opportunity for parks, plazas or courtyards—important parts of the public realm. 3. Buildings will not be greater than 200 feet in length, thereby minimizing the negative impact continuous walls can have on a comfortable pedestrian experience. 4. All streets are not equal. The plan outlines a hierarchy that is driven by the kind of experiences that are expected on these streets and how they facilitate an enlivened public realm. 5. Designated transition zones are about maintaining the quality of life in these areas without restricting growth in other parts of the district. 6. Promenades and East-West Streets are the bridge between single family neighborhoods, such as the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina and the west side of Richfield, to more intense parts of the district. 7. Street Rooms will intersect and overlap each other in many circumstances. At these intersections, lower building heights should prevail, giving the smaller scaled building precedence over larger scale buildings. 8. Building footprints above 60 feet in height are limited to 12,000 SF for residential uses, and 24,000 SF for commercial. 9. Within the first 60 vertical feet of a building, primary materials systems that are more traditional like brick, stone, glass wall systems are preferred. Above 60 feet, other materials such as metal wall systems within a larger curtainwall system, can be introduced. These baseline parameters should not be a deterrent to architectural innovation but rather are intended to serve as a measure of quality and continuity throughout the district 10. Transparency at the ground level facing the public realm is key to the individual experience and is a catalyst for how to activate and maintain a community-based approach to daily life and experience. 5. Implementing and Measuring the Guidance Ten Things to Remember File #227705245 September 8, 2022 DRAFT Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 7200 and 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN September 2022 i DRAFT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-3 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES............................................ 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................. 5-5 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................... 5-6 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: September 8, 2022 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 September 2022 1-1 DRAFT 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new mixed use development located at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located on the west side of France Avenue between Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The proposed project location is currently occupied by two vacant office buildings, a parking structure, and surface parking. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/70th Street • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • Gallagher Drive/proposed access • 72nd Street/proposed access The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office buildings and constructing two new buildings. The project includes 468 total on-site parking spaces, with 234 on the 7200 site and 234 on the 7250 site. The entire project is expected to be completed by 2027. The land uses and sizes assumed for this study are shown below: • 7250 Building – 124,620 square feet of general office and a 2,200 square foot coffee shop. • 7200 Building – 150 apartment units and 10,000 square feet of general retail space. As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The project will be constructed in phases, with the 7250 building constructed first and the 7200 building constructed at a later date. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 372 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 340 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 3,214 weekday daily trips. • The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations at the study intersections. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. September 2022 1-2 DRAFT • Traffic volumes on 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane are expected to increase by 57 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 48 trips during the p.m. peak hour. • The proposed project is designed to provide both pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding infrastructure. Space for pedestrian amenities is provided along all streets surrounding the project. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is provided at the Gallagher Drive crosswalk. • Both short-term and long-term bicycle spaces should be provided in order to accommodate employees, customers, and residents. The short-term spaces should be located near building entrances and provide facilities to securely park each bicycle. Long-term spaces for residents should be provided in the parking ramp or in a separate room within the building. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station would help encourage bicycle use by all site users. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data for both Phase 1 and full development of the site. • Edina City code requires 1.0 parking space per apartment unit and 1 space per 300 square feet for the office, retail, and coffee shop uses. This equates to 422 total spaces for Phase 1 and 605 total spaces for the full development. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for site users. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents and employees. September 2022 2-1 DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new mixed use development located at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located on the west side of France Avenue between Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The proposed project location is currently occupied by two vacant office buildings, a parking structure, and surface parking. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/70th Street • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • Gallagher Drive/proposed access • 72nd Street/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office buildings and constructing two new buildings. The project includes 468 total on-site parking spaces, with 234 on the 7200 site and 234 on the 7250 site. The entire project is expected to be completed by 2027. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The land uses and sizes assumed for this study are shown below: • 7250 Building – 124,620 square feet of general office and a 2,200 square foot coffee shop. • 7200 Building – 150 apartment units and 10,000 square feet of general retail space. As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The project will be constructed in phases, with the 7250 building constructed first and the 7200 building constructed at a later date. September 2022 2-2 DRAFT September 2022 2-3 DRAFT September 2022 3-1 DRAFT 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by two vacant office buildings, a parking structure, and surface parking. The site is bounded by France Avenue to the east, Gallagher Drive to the south, 72nd Street to the north, and residential areas to the west. Near the site location, France Avenue is a six-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street are a two-lane roadways. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3. France Avenue/70th Street (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound 72nd Street approach. The eastbound approach provides one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and three through lanes. The southbound approach provides two through lanes and one through/right turn lane. Left turns are not allowed from 72nd Street onto France Avenue. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. September 2022 3-2 DRAFT Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound Gallagher Drive approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. The westbound approach provides one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left/right turn lane. 72nd Street/Cornelia Drive (all-way stop sign control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with stop signs on all approaches. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. Turn movement data for the intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in July 2022. September 2022 3-3 DRAFT September 2022 4-1 DRAFT 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2027. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2022 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2027 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 0.5 percent per year to determine 2027 No-Build volumes. The 0.5 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth in the area. • 2027 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2027 No-Build volumes to determine 2027 Build volumes. Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the eleventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trips generated by the existing uses were based on the traffic count data. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total 7200 Building Apartments 150 DU 13 43 56 36 23 59 681 General Retail 10,000 SF 14 10 24 33 33 66 545 Subtotal 27 53 80 69 56 125 1226 7250 Building General Office 124,620 SF 166 23 189 30 149 179 1351 Coffee Shop 2,200 SF 52 51 103 18 18 36 637 Subtotal 218 74 292 48 167 215 1988 Totals 245 127 372 117 223 340 3214 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet The coffee shop is expected to be utilized by residents, employees, and visitors as well as the general public. The trip totals for the coffee shop have been reduced to account for residents, employees, and visitors who will already be on-site. September 2022 4-2 DRAFT Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 30 percent to/from the north on France Avenue • 7 percent to/from the west on 72nd Street • 8 percent to/from the north of Cornelia Drive • 5 percent to/from the east on 70th Street • 5 percent to/from the east on Hazelton Road • 5 percent to/from the east on Gallagher Drive • 5 percent to/from the west on Parklawn Avenue • 5 percent to/from the east on Parklawn Avenue • 30 percent to/from the south on France Avenue Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. September 2022 4-3 DRAFT September 2022 4-4 DRAFT September 2022 5-1 DRAFT 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. September 2022 5-2 DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Figures 6 and 7 and discussed below. France Avenue/70th Street (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. September 2022 5-3 DRAFT 72nd Street/Cornelia Drive (all-way stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2027 No-Build, and 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Gallagher Drive/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. 72nd Street/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2027 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Overall Traffic Impacts The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations at the study intersections. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. 72nd Street Impacts 72nd Street extends west from France Avenue and provides connections to residential areas west of the project site. 72nd Street is also used to access 70th Street via connections to Cornelia Drive and Wooddale Avenue. Observations indicate that traffic utilizing 72nd Street is a mixture of local trips and trips accessing 70th Street. Under existing conditions, the office building has two access points on 72nd Street. Through observations and data collected at the access locations for previous studies completed for this site, approximately 15% of existing site trips used 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane to access the site. Under future conditions, this equates to 57 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 48 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on both sides of France Avenue, on the north/west side of Gallagher Drive west of France Avenue, and on the north side of 72nd Street west of France Avenue. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is located on the south/east side of Gallagher Drive. Striped crosswalks and pedestrian signal heads are provided at all signalized intersections along France Avenue. The proposed project is designed to provide both pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding infrastructure. Space for pedestrian amenities is provided along all streets surrounding the project. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is provided at the Gallagher Drive crosswalk. September 2022 5-4 DRAFT The site plan does not specifically indicate the location or number of bicycle parking spaces. Both short-term and long-term bicycle spaces should be provided in order to accommodate employees, customers, and residents. The short-term spaces should be located near building entrances and provide facilities to securely park each bicycle. Long-term spaces for residents should be provided in the parking ramp or in a separate room within the building. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station would help encourage bicycle use by all site users. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus route 6. Bus stops exist on France Avenue, Gallagher Drive, Parklawn Avenue, and Hazelton Road. Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. • Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for site users. • Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents and employees. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10-20 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. The overall cost of the strategies is estimated at $2,000. September 2022 5-5 DRAFT September 2022 5-6 DRAFT September 2022 6-1 DRAFT 6.0 Parking Analysis The entire project will ultimately include 468 on-site parking spaces, with 234 on the 7200 site and 234 on the 7250 site. The first phase of the project will be construction of the 7250 building, which will include 219 underground stalls, 15 surface stalls, and 83 temporary stalls on the 7200 site. Therefore the 7250 building will have access to 317 stalls until the 7200 building is constructed at a later date. The total number of parking stalls for each phase of the project is shown below: • Phase 1 (7250 building only) – 317 stalls • Full build (7250 and 7200 buildings) – 468 stalls Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for Phase 1 is 289 spaces, which occurs between 8 am and 11 am. The 317 spaces provided for Phase 1 can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. The peak parking demand for the entire development 356 spaces, which occurs between 8 am and 11 am. The 468 spaces provided for the entire development can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. If the retail and apartment for the 7200 building change from those currently assumed, the parking calculations should be updated to ensure adequate on-site parking. Edina City code requires 1.0 parking space per apartment unit and 1 space per 300 square feet for the office, retail, and coffee shop uses. This equates to 422 total spaces for Phase 1 and 605 total spaces for the full development. September 2022 7-1 DRAFT 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 372 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 340 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 3,214 weekday daily trips. • The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations at the study intersections. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volumes on 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane are expected to increase by 57 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 48 trips during the p.m. peak hour. • The proposed project is designed to provide both pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding infrastructure. Space for pedestrian amenities is provided along all streets surrounding the project. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is provided at the Gallagher Drive crosswalk. • Both short-term and long-term bicycle spaces should be provided in order to accommodate employees, customers, and residents. The short-term spaces should be located near building entrances and provide facilities to securely park each bicycle. Long-term spaces for residents should be provided in the parking ramp or in a separate room within the building. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station would help encourage bicycle use by all site users. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data for both Phase 1 and full development of the site. • Edina City code requires 1.0 parking space per apartment unit and 1 space per 300 square feet for the office, retail, and coffee shop uses. This equates to 422 total spaces for Phase 1 and 605 total spaces for the full development. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for site users. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents and employees. September 2022 8-1 DRAFT 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets The CITY of EDINA Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Revise PUD- 16 – 7200 & 7250 France Avenue The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 2 Site The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 3 Site Site The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 4 2019 Approved Overall Development Plan The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 6 Sketch Plan Proposal The CITY of EDINARevisions from Sketch Plan: EdinaMN.gov 7 Eliminated the retail/grocery store Enhanced the north-south drive/bike/pedestrian experience Enhanced architecture (applicant to detail) Eliminated the drive entrance off France. The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 8 Phase 2Phase 1 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 9 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINAThis Request Requires: EdinaMN.gov 12 A Rezoning/Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District to establish a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan review for Phase 1. The CITY of EDINA Planning & Zoning Discretion Pyramid Bldg Permit Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Zoning, Rezoning Comprehensive Plan Subdivisions/Plats Variances More Discretion Less Discretion The CITY of EDINAReview of the Site Plan EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 18 City Standard (PUD-16) (Measured to the curb) POD District (Measured to the curb) Proposed (Measured to the curb) Front – 72nd Street Front – France Ave. Front – Galagher Drive Side – West (north half) Side – West (south half 35 feet 39 feet 20 feet 90 feet 45 feet 30 feet 50 feet 30 feet 20 feet 20 feet 30 feet 50 feet 25 feet* 150 feet 90 feet Building Height 6 stories and 67 feet 4 stories and 48 feet 5-6 stories and 84 feet* Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.8 .50 1.0* Building Coverage .30 .31* Parking Office/retail – 456 spaces Housing – 150 spaces Total – 606 spaces 468 spaces* The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issue Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? EdinaMN.gov 19 Yes. Staff does support the revised PUD, for the following reasons: 1. While the plans are more flawed that the previously approved plans, they still do generally address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. Highlights continue to include: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and connections through the site both east-west and north-south; increasing the public realm on the site; eliminating most of the surface parking stalls, with none being visible from France Avenue in the Phase 2 build out. The street typology that requires buildings step in 10 feet above 60 feet in height shall be made a condition of approval. Affordable housing should be required within the future apartment project as well as public art located along France Avenue. They will be seeking a LEED certified building in Phase 1. The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 20 84Feet 60Feet TrafficLanes50 Foot Setback Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 2 Cornelia Overlay at France Avenue The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issue Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? EdinaMN.gov 21 2. The project would meet the following goals of the Comprehensive Plan:  Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment.  Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces.  Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways.  Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets.  Provision of the north-south public vehicle, bike and pedestrian connection through the site.  Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base.  Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.  Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region. The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issue Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? EdinaMN.gov 22 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would:  Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area.  The building would be of high-quality architectural brick, metal, stone, and glass.  Ensure that the buildings proposed in Phase 1 would be the only buildings built on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Phase 2 would be required to be multi-family residential with some retail commercial as long as there is adequate parking on the site for all phases.  Project would add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 10% of the units in Phase 2 for affordable housing.  Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan.  Meet the City’s sustainability policy, including seeking a LEED certified building in Phase 1.  Provide 19% of the site for public use. The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issue Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? EdinaMN.gov 23 4. The provision of public space still makes up 19% of the site for the interior public sidewalks, driveways, bike space and public realm. If the public space in front of the building on France, Gallagher and 72nd street was included it would make up 38% of the site. (See attached public realm graphic.) 5. The proposed height is justified. While the proposed buildings would be taller than the previously approved project it would still meet the required setback of buildings 5-6 feet tall to R-1 property. Edina City Code requires that buildings 5-6 stories tall be setback two times the height of the building from the property line of single-family homes. The building height is 84 feet; therefore a 168-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 255 feet. 6. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Stantec conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 24 The CITY of EDINABetter Together Edina EdinaMN.gov 25 The CITY of EDINAStaff & Planning Commission Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 26 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 27 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 28 The CITY of EDINARecommendation EdinaMN.gov 29 Close the public hearing at noon on September 26 and continue action to the October 6 City Council meeting. The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 30 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 31 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 32 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 33 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 34 P.U.D. SUBMISSION 7 200 & 7 250 FRANCE EDIN A, MN 2 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 TABLE OFCONTENTS A. SITECONTEXT B. PROJECT OVERVIEW + GUIDELINES C. SITE PLANS +PHASING D. SITE FORCES + IMPROVEMENTS E. CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS +VISUALS 3 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 PROCESS TODATE PROJECTDATES MARCH 8,2022 COMMUNITY &NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING APRIL 13,2022 PLANNING COMMISSION - SKETCH PLANPRESENTATION APRIL 19,2022 CITY COUNCIL - SKETCH PLANPRESENTATION JULY 21,2022 COMMUNITY &NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT MEETING SEPT 14,2022 PLANNING COMMISSION - P.U.D. HEARING & PRESENTATION SEPT 20,2022 CITY COUNCIL - P.U.D. PRESENTATION OCT 6,2022 CITY COUNCIL FINALACTION (IF NEEDED) JECT (ADDPRO REND ER) 4 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 EXISTING SITECONDITIONS 5 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 EXISTING BIRD’S EYEVIEWS 6 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS 7 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 STATEMENT +NARRATIVE PROJECTOVERVIEW: The team envisions this site as an opportunity to create an iconic development along the France corridor that will be a catalyst for growth. • Project Team includes Orion Investments, ESG, and others to advance the development, entitlement and design of our redevelopment concept • The Greater Southdale District Plan and District Design Experience Guidelines serve as the main planning and design criteria for this development. PROJECTPRINCIPLES: • Consistent with the City of Edina’s vision to create a street grid system • Excavate site to create two levels of parking below newly-established grade. Upon completion, 94% of the parking will be below grade. • Stormwater retention pond and rain garden included to manage local rainfall on site and provide public amenity when not active. • 500+ jobs created. • Environmental remediation of site. • Bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to neighboring infrastructure. • Sustainability // LEED Certified. 8 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SOUTHDALEVISION the vision:walkable the vision:human-scaled the vision: adestinationthe vision:green 9 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DEVELOPMENTOVERVIEW 7250 OFFICE BUILDING ~124,620 GROSS FLOORAREA-234 COMMERCIAL PARKING STALLS-94% OF PARKING IS BELOW GRADE, ACCESS IS OFF OF THE NORTH-SOUTH STREET DANILA PLAZA - PEDESTRIANWALKWAY- EXTENSION OF BUILDING AMENITYSPACE~ 12,110 SF PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENTAREA STORMWATER RETENTIONBASIN ACCESSIBLE SCENIC WALKWAY AND GREEN SPACE TEMPORARY GREENSPACE (PHASE 1A) OR INTERIM PARKING (PHASE 1B); FUTURE BUILDING SITE (PHASE2)- POTENTIALLY 124,620 GFA - 83 TEMPORARY PARKING STALLS (PHASE 1B) DEDICATED BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH RUNS PARALLEL TO NORTH-SOUTH STREET, CONNECTING 72ND STREET AND GALLAGHER AVE 10 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 N SITEPLAN SITEPLAN: • Site design creates attractive public amenities for the surroundingcommunity • France Ave setback becomes pedestrian corridor with landscaped paths, treescapes, and seating areas • Stormwater retention basin nature area with landscaped paths and overlooks on west side of site • Introduction of Danila Plaza to create a pedestrian-only corridor connected by ADA-compliant ramps and paths throughout entirety of site; can be utilized for accessible pedestrian access to on-site businesses during the day and then utilized for community events in the evening • Human-scaled, comfortable pedestrian experience as well as improved bike access to connect to nearby bike path infrastructure • Native and low maintenance plantings at stormwater retention pond • Eliminate 2 curb cuts on France Ave PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENTAREA 11 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SITE PLAN REVISIONS 15 Gallagher Drive France Ave(A Public R/W) StConc. Walk W(A7Pub2licnR/Wd)LFra(24" RCP 24" RCP6" CIP 18" RCP DEDICATED BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH RUNS PARALLEL TO NORTH-SOUTH STREET, CONNECTING 72ND STREET AND GALLAGHER AVE 12 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 PHASE1A: •Office Building on SE corner • All public amenities and infrastructure completed in Phase 1. •15 Surface parking stalls on parcel; 219 below- grade parking stalls across two parking levels to acheive 94%below-grade pakring. • Planted setbacks and hardscape paths with seating off of 72nd and France improve pedestrian experience • Primary Building entry points are along internal streets • Phase 1 includes stormwater basinnature area as well as Danila Plaza and new internal north-south street PHASING 13 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 PHASE1B: •Office Building on SE corner •IF NEEDED: 115 temporary parking stallson NE portion of lot PHASING 14 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 PHASE2: •Potential Mixed Use Building on NE corner •Multi-family // Hospitality // Retail Mix • Approximately 150 Units. • Majority enclosed parking. PHASING 15 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN BROWNFIELD REVELOPMENT - Transforming a existing parking lot - Dramatically improving the physical environment ADDING DENSITY WITH STRONG PUBLIC REALM - Density supporting current and future transit - Best Land Use Practices - Promotes multiple transportation options PUBLIC GREEN SPACE - Supports healthy outdoor human activity - Strong urban tree canopy throught the site STORMWATER - Improvement from existing surface asphalt conditions - Holding capacity for large precipitation events - Improved quality prior to returning to groundwater NATIVE LANDSCAPING - Supporting the natural ecosystem ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING & CARSHARING SOLAR READY ORGANICS RECYCLING HEALTH & WELLNESS IN BULDING DESIGN SUSTAINABILITYSUMMARY 16 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 10 AM - DECEMBER21 10 AM - MARCH / SEPTEMBER21 12 PM - MARCH / SEPTEMBER21 3 PM - MARCH / SEPTEMBER21 10 AM - JUNE21 12 PM - DECEMBER21 12 PM - JUNE21 3 PM - DECEMBER21 3 PM - JUNE21 SHADOW STUDIES 17 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SITEACCESS SITEENTRANCE SITEEGRESS DANILAPLAZA DANILAPLAZA 18 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 BICYCLESUMMARY DANILA PLAZA - 6 BICYCLE PARKINGSTALLS ACCESS AND CONNECTION TO NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL DANILAPLAZA DEDICATED BIKE PATH PARALLEL TO NORTH-SOUTH STREET 7250 BUILDING - 24 BICYCLE PARKINGSTALLS 19 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 PEDESTRIANCONNECTIONS DANILAPLAZA 20 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SOUTHDALEFRAMEWORK SOUTHDALE DESIGN GUIDELINES DISTRICTS SITE: 7200 &7250 APPLICABLE STREET ROOMTYPOLOGIES: STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 1A: WEST PROMENADE / TRANSITION TOCORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY: TRANSITION ZONE STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3:NEW LOCALSTREETS 21 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 STREETGRID EXISTING STREETGRID CURRENTLYPROPOSED STREETGRID POTENTIALFUTURE STREET PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS POTENTIALFUTURE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION NINE THINGS TO REMEMBER: 1.Every new development begins with the 200’ x 200’ block, or some variation based on context. The existing property has been broken down into three smaller blocks by new internal streets. The arrangement of blocks will providea density appropriate for a transitional area in proximity to residential areas, while providing a mixed-use environment with walkable streetscapes and attractive greenspaces. 2.Every block or building in a development will need streets to connect between buildings. Not all of these streets will need to accommodate vehicles, providing the opportunity for parks, plazas or courtyards—important parts of the publicrealm. Danila Plaza is proposed as a pedestrian-only internal street within the redevelopment. This redevelopment creates small blocks with pleasantly-arranged urban public and private spaces while enhancing connections within the broader district. Danila Plaza extends beyong the North-South street to provide additional access to the greenspace amenity surrounding new stormwater basin along the west side of the site. 3.Buildings will not be greater than 200 feet in length, thereby minimizing the negative impact continuous walls can have on a comfortable pedestrianexperience. Buildings designed for 7200 and 7250 will comply with the intent of the 200 ft maximum requirement. Given the importance of providing enclosed parking within the district, the project proposes enclosed parking at both buildings. The proposed building at 7250 is 140 feet wide and 7200 is intended to be of similar massing. In order to maximize efficiency of the floor plan and to keep the parking podium at 7250 below grade, the length of the building is roughly 220 feet. This length is interrupted by a 90 degree jog in the floor plate at the building's mid point to break up the expression of the elevation. The footprints of the upper levels of office are about 134 feet by 218 feet to allow for a floorplate of approximately 29,100 SF. Careful attention and thought have been paid to the step-backs, footprint, and orientation of the 7250 building. Placing the buildings along the east side of the development assures that building shadows won’t negatively impact the neighboring residential properties. The building massing has been developed in close coordination with the Southdale street typology guidance to ensure that setbacks of building bulk meet the intent of this pedestrian-focused document. A mixture of material, architectural detailing highlighting entry locations, and transparency through glazing will be leveraged to break down the opaqueness of the buildings at the pedestrianlevel. 4.All streets are not equal. The plan outlines a hierarchy that is driven by the kind of experiences that are expected on these streets and how they facilitate an enlivened public realm. France Avenue is a major street artery that lines the site to the east. Access to the project is primarily from 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive via a new internal North-South Street. Additionally, a new East-West pedestrian-only street (Danila) provides an accessible means of accessing both blocks at the mid-point of the site. This pedestrian walkway will be a highly landscaped, walkable, sustainably focused site feature that provides pedestrian scale entry elements to each of the mixed-use portions of the project as well as a flexible indoor / outdoor spaces in varoius places for seasonal programming. Refer to the typology diagrams throughout this document and other illustrations that depict this hierarchy and the experience of each street typology. 22 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DESIGN EXPERIENCEGUIDELINES NINE THINGS TO REMEMBER: 5.Designated transition zones are about maintaining the quality of life in these areas without restricting growth in other parts of the district. Transition zones are critical to neighborhood building, especially when transforming a suburban environment to an urban environment over time with phased development projects. The creation of the dedicated pedestrian street and greenspace surrounding the stormwater basin within this project will create a graceful transition from the residential neighborhoods located to the west, to the commercial areas located east of France. By introducing a new local street grid via the new internal North-South street, this development may catalyze future growth to the north and south of the site by extending street in these directions. 6. Promenades and East-West Streets are the bridge between single family neighborhoods, such as the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina and the west side of Richfield, to more intense parts of the district. A dedicated pedestrian east-west link (Danila Plaza) from France Avenue to the new natural area will be provided. The master plan provides a positive pedestrian experience throughout the site, connecting pedestrian movement to green space, the pedestrian plaza, and providing a clear pedestrian hierarchy to movement in and around the site. The project provides the beginning of a strong neighborhood pedestrian circulation network that connects to existing and future development in all directions. 7.Street Rooms will intersect and overlap each other in many circumstances. At these intersections, lower building heights should prevail, giving the smaller scaled building precedence over larger scale buildings. The pedestrian street (Danila Plaza) is strategically located to provide a connector between all 3 sectors of the site, and ultimately acts as a large street room gathering place for neighbors, tenants, and visitors. This area will be the gathering focal point for the many pedestrian connections, acting as a collector to bring people together. 8.Within the first 60 vertical feet of a building, primary materials systems that are more traditional like brick, stone, glass wall systems are preferred. Above 60 feet, other materials such as metal wall systems within a larger curtainwall system, can be introduced. These baseline parameters should not be a deterrent to architectural innovation but rather are intended to serve as a measure of quality and continuity throughout the district. The primary exterior materials proposed for the 7250 building are architectural precast with stone texture and glass at the ground level. The upper levels are clad in glass, architectural brick, and metal panel accents. 9. Transparency at the ground level facing the public realm is key to the individual experience and is a catalyst for how to activate and maintain a community-based approach to daily life and experience. At the pedestrian level along France Avenue, the commercial space is articulated by bays of glass book-ended with stone-look architectural precast panels. Full height glazing within these bays allow unobstructed views of activity within the building and define points of entry. The primary entry and lobby will be located on the north end of the west facade adjacent to a limited amount of convenience surface parking and awning offering protection from inclement weather. This lobby also provides access to the shared elevators for the below grade parking and office as well as shared amenities for the office building such as conferencing, and a coffee/food kiosk. ADA-accessible paths allow for pedestrians to move freely across the site to engage with all areas of the site including the public natural area surrounding the stormwater basin as well as the future building at 7200. 23 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DESIGN EXPERIENCEGUIDELINES 24 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DESIGN EXPERIENCEGUIDELINES RELEVANT STREET ROOMTYPOLOGIES: Street Room Typology 1: WEST PROMENADE / TRANSITION TO CORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD •On France Avenue, a 50-foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a building podium height of 60 feet. Above the 60-foot height limit, additional height should step back 10 feet from the face of the building, to a maximum height of 84 feet. Building meets the required 50'-0" setback along France. Additionally, the building facade changes materiality at roughly 62 ft above street level and then steps back 37 ft at the north-east corner Level 5 Amenity deck. The building height to top of mechanical penthouse is 84'-0". •On the east side of the West Promenade, building faces should not exceed 50’ in height. Any height above that limit should step back 20 feet from the facade of the building. The west buiding facade rises 48'-0"and then steps back 18'-6". •All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. Proposed parking is enclosed within buildings with the exception small surface parking lot provided for enhanced pedestrain safety and ease of access. Street Room Typology 3: NEW LOCAL STREETS •On France Avenue, a 50-foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a minimum building height of 60 feet (diagram at left). Above that 60-foot height, the building face should step back two feet to create a cornice line and can then extend to 105 feet. Above 105 feet, building faces must step back an additional 10 feet (as illustrated in diagram at right, above.) Building exceeds required 50'-0" setback along France. Additionally, the building facade changes materiality at roughly62 ft above street level and then steps back 37 ft at the north-east corner Level 5 Amenity deck. The building height totop of mechanicalpenthouseis 84'-0". •Building podiums along these streets need to maintain as closely as possible the 60-foot height limit while still adhering to the guidance of 75% of building face at the setback line to create the fundamental experience of the street room. Building is located on or within 2'-0" of the setback line on France and Gallagher. •All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing.Parking is enclosed and primarily located below grade. Small surface lot near main entrance of 7250 provides ease of access. • Parking and building services should not be accessed via these streets. No additional curb cuts are proposed along France Avenue. No building access for vehicles or loading is proposed on France Avenue. •Incorporate 10- to 12-foot wide sidewalks that create opportunities for gathering, outdoor cafes, pavilions, etc. Sidewalks along France Avenue are ample at greater than 15 ft in overall width (7-8 ft each) as it is a double sidewalk proposal allowing for plaza space and outdoor seating. Pedestrian street Danila Plaza is 60'-0" wide and incorporates pedestrian paths, stairs and ADA-compliant ramps as well as a series of seating areas. Pedestrian path along west side of the North- South street provides seating areas and an overlook feature to enjoy the preserved natural area. For other sidewalk dimensions see diagram in this document. •Within the 50-foot setback, trees should be planted in a double row to add a strong canopy for pedestrian activity. Trees are planted in double rows on France and 70th, see site plan for arrangement. THE PUBLIC REALM EXPERIENCE: Connections •The overall strategy is to connect intersections, incorporate street typologies, and incorporate green systems to add value to the experience of the district. •The public realm is to be connected continuously north-south from Centennial Lakes, the Promenade, the Galleria, Southdale Center, Fairview Southdale, to Strachauer Park. All new developmentshallsupportthat goal. •The public realm should be connected east-west from Edinborough Park to Centennial Lakes, west of France to Pentagon Park and Fred Richards Park to Highway 100 on the west. This will set up future connections to districts to the west—such as 70th and Cahill— supporting an overall vision of a more connected and integrated Edina community. •The district must be connected continuously east-west from the Cornelia neighborhood to YorktownPark. •New north-south promenades should be created on the west side of France and east side of Xerxes as part of the broader strategy to sensitively transition to single family residential neighborhoods. •Expand Centennial Lakes Park to France Avenue… celebrate this important public amenity by making it more visible as a gateway into the district. •Create a dynamic landscape that includes water, especially stormwater expressed as part of landscape, to create public amenity spaces. •Streets within the superblocks, East and West Promenades, and extension of the Promenade north to Strachauer Park should be surfaced with pavers to promote a dominanceof pedestriansand bikes over vehicles. •New parks and plazas shall be either public or publicly-accessible, not private, in nature. •Increase number of sidewalks, pathways, and smaller parks/gardens to better address mobility. Incorporate places to sit throughout the district. •New trees should provide continuity of the street room experience with canopies that are consistent with the Street Room Typology to enhance the continuity of pedestrian experience. The landscape and hardscape elements are woven through the site to create a human-scaled, enticing, yet comfortable pedestrian experience. Native plantings throughout the site create a low maintenance, attractive greenspace. Planting beds runs parallel with France Ave and act as both a buffer from the adjacent traffic and a functional means of managing on-site storm water. The native planting gardens also provide an educational opportunity to highlight the City of Edina’s laudable goals for environmental stewardship. Landscaped areas with benches and public art elements create publicly accessible gathering areas while also serving to activate the building's street-facing façades. The development team has paid close attention to how this site interfaces with the adjacent properties to the west by ensuring that building scale, landscaping and proposed uses respect the adjacent neighborhood. We've also incorporated multi- modal street grids designed to connect with existing and future bike, pedestrian, and vehicle infrastructure. Intersections •Street Room Typologies overlay each other, unifying the overall district experience through the recognition of unique conditions that evoke unique design responses based upon location. •Street Room Typologies connect intersections throughout the district, linking experiences together from one neighborhood to the next. •Street Room Typologies with lower façade heights take president over those with higher façade heights at these points of intersection. •The architecture of a façade of one block making up an intersection should be conceived as part of all corners of the intersection. •Crosswalks at intersections need to be an integral part of the public realm and continue the overall street room experience from one block to another. •The hierarchy of intersections will change based on an evolving context and investment in the intersection experience. The intersection of Gallagher & France is an important point of connection for vehicles, bikes, and pedestrians alike. A robust entry plaza with decorative paving, landscape and lighting will identify the building entry. A highly visible building corner at street level will encourage activity in around the building and act as a welcoming sign to the traffic moving by sharing the character of the development and activity within. Street Room Form •Building setbacks are to be considered as a part of the overall landscape and public amenities, and should be designed to create a continuous pedestrian experience along major corridors to support “pools of human activity.” •Every new development should connect all publicly-accessible spaces such as pocket parks, courtyards and plazas to the street room typology. The site design provides the beginning of a strong neighborhood pedestrian circulation network that connects to existing and future development in all directions. We provide a safe and enhanced pedestrian and bike movement along France avenue separating and setting back the pedestrian from France moving the sidewalk closer to the building and buffering a lush green infrastructure landscape that will be both function and educational. Provided a human-scaled street grid by introducing Danila Plaza at the midpoint of the site: a pedestrian- only path with ADA-compliant ramps, stairs, benches and landscaping from France to the new North-South local street and to the new storm-water basin public nature area on the west side of the site. • Along all major corridors, seventy five percent (75%) of face of building walls need to be at the setback line to support the creation of a ‘street room.’ • All new building façades in the district must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency at the ground level. Project aims to comply with this stipulation. Please see exterior elevations for this submittal. Design of building facades aim to strike a balance that adequately meets both Design Experience Guidelines and the City of Edina's Sustainable Building Policy. • All building façades are prime (including parking) and must be designed accordingly. There is no back side of a building. We have carefully considered all facades as active and human-scaled. Majority of parking is located below grade, with one small convenience surface lot on west side of building for improved accessibility and activation of primary entrance. • All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials facing the public realm. The building uses natural materials facing the public realm in this way. Please see exterior elevations for this submittal. • Above 50-60 feet, glass, precast panels with brick/tile are the preferred material palette. Metal panel can be used as a secondary part of a wall system. Please see exterior elevations for this submittal. • No building façade can be longer than 200’ without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. The longest building facade is 220'; however, this elevation breaks at the approximate mid-point of block with an inset portion of the street- level facade. Please see site plans for this submittal. 25 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DESIGN EXPERIENCEGUIDELINES THE PUBLIC REALM EXPERIENCE: Building Form •Ground floors should have a minimum ceiling height of 20’ for flexibility. This floor-to-floor height will allow the space to accommodate commercial, two floors of parking, or two-story townhouses. First floor building height is 20 ft tall at 7250 •Above-grade parking structures should be designed with flat floorplates to allow for future conversion and lined with programmable public realm space to minimize the visual impact of car storage. Parking is enclosed and primarily located below grade. Small surface lot near main entrance of 7250 provides ease of access. •Within 50-60 feet of the ground, it is preferred that rooftops be programmed to accommodate residential or public user activities (e.g. a restaurant or terrace). Rooftop located with 50-65 ft of the ground level are programmed to offer rooftop terraces and green spaces. On the street level, the pedestrian plaza (Danila) is designed to create flexibility for a variety of uses, including providing additional outdoor seating area for the office coffee kiosk and building amenity conferencing center. •All development services, including rooftop mechanical systems, should be located within buildings and should not be visible from the public realm, or semi-private and private areas of the development. The exception are rooftop-mounted solar panels, which should be located on the highest point of the buildings. The development has all rooftop mechanical systems planned as screened from the public realm, or semi-private and private areas. The tallest mechanical equipment (i.e. cooling tower) is located on top level and projects through roof in order to reduce overall building height. •Building footprints above 60 feet should be no greater than 12,000 SF forresidential use and 24,000 SF for commercial space. Our office floorplates vary from 21,745 - 26,200 GFA. These floorplate sizes are a result of careful planning around utility consumption, natural light entering space, creating connections within space, and maximizing efficiencies. •Design buildings for flexibility and adaptability in the future, including use of structural systems that will allow a building’s function to fundamentally change. The development team has planned to accommodate a variety of users on the first floor, including but not limited to office, small commercial, and small retail. Allowing for future flexibility has been a cornerstone or our design ideas and is reflected in our structural bay sizing and construction type selection. 26 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DESIGN EXPERIENCEGUIDELINES 27 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 STREET ROOMTYPOLOGIES STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 1A:WEST PROMENADE / TRANSITION TOCORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD 28 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3:NEW LOCALSTREETS STREET ROOMTYPOLOGIES 29 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 DRAWING SET (SUBMITTED AS SEPARATEDOCUMENT) DRAWING NUMBER DRAWINGNAME 08/12/22 -P.U.D.ARCHITECTURAL T1.1 TITLESHEET ● CIVIL C0.0 TITLESHEET ● C1.0 PH.1 REMOVALS PLAN ● C1.1 PH.2 REMOVALS PLAN ● C2.0 PH. 1 SITEPLAN ● C2.0A P1(A) SITEPLAN ● C2.0B P1(B) SITE PLAN ● C2.1 PH. 2 SITEPLAN ● C3.0A PH. 1 (A) GRADING PLAN ● C3.0B PH 1 (B) GRADINGPLAN ● C3.1 PH. 2 GRADINGPLAN ● C4.0A PH. 1 (A) UTILITY PLAN ● C4.0B PH 1(B) UTILITY PLAN ● C4.1 PH. 2 UTILITY PLAN ● C5.0 CIVILDETAILS ● C5.1 CIVILDETAILS ● C5.2 CIVILDETAILS ● SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS ● SW1.1 PH. 1 SWPPP -PROPOSED CONDITIONS ● SW1.2 PH. 2 SWPPP -PROPOSED CONDITIONS ●SW1.3 SWPPP - DETAILS ● SW1.4 SWPPP - NARRATIVE ● SW1.5 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS ● SW1.6 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS ● V1.0 SITESURVEY ● V1.1 SITESURVEY ● LANDSCAPE L1.1A LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - PHASE1A ● L1.1B LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - PHASE1B ● L1.2 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN -PHASE2 ● L1.3 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - ADAROUTES ● L2.0 LANDSCAPE PLANTINGPLAN ● ARCHITECTURAL A0.1 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS (7200 &7250)● A0.2 SITE PLAN -DEMOLITION (7200 &7250)● A0.3A SITE PLAN - PHASE1A ● A0.3B SITE PLAN -PHASE 1B (7200 & 7250)● A0.4 SITE PLAN -PHASE 2 (7200 &7250)● A0.5 SITE SECTION DIAGRAMS - PHASE 1 (7200 & 7250)● A0.6 SITE SECTION DIAGRAMS - PHASE 2 (7200 & 7250)● A0.7 PHASE 1 AND 2 SITERENDERINGS ● A0.8 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS (7200 & 7250)● A0.9 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS (7200 & 7250)● A0.10 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS (7200 & 7250)● A1.1 7250 FLOOR PLANS ● A1.2 7250 FLOOR PLANS ● A1.3 7250 FLOOR PLANS ● A1.4 7250 FLOOR PLANS ●A2.1 7250 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ● A2.2 7250 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ● A2.3 7250 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ● A2.4 7250 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ● A2.5 7250 EXTERIORMATERIALS ● ELECTRICAL E0.1P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ● E0.2P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ● E0.3P ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC DETAIL ● SUBMITTED DRAWINGSET 30 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SKETCH PLAN REVISIONS Sketch Plan Feedback/Comments Major Points: · Address the West Promenade Street Room typology 1A: o Incorporated multi-modal local street in north-south direction -Bikes and vehicles share this street with striped bike lanes and vegetated median strip. -Due to significant grade changes, the street itself was not determined to be appropriate location for pedestrians to share; pedestrian paths are closer to proposed buildings for safety and accessibility. o West 72 ½ street (AKA Danila Plaza) -Developed to become a pedestrian-only public realm and a network of accessible green spaces with art located at intersection with France. · Building scale and fenestration: o “75% of building walls to be at setback line to support creation of street room” - When considering Danila Plaza as “street” as defined by the applicable typologies, the proposed buildings meet this requirement. o“Allbuildingfaçades areprime(includingparking)andmustbedesignedaccordingly. There is no back side of a building. “ -Removed grocery store from program – all facades of proposed building have been carefully considered asprimewithmixofhuman-scaledglazingandnatural materials. o“All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall usenatural materials facing the public realm.” - Natural materials have been selected for portions of all facades within first 60 feet of building above grade. o“The landscape of the West Promenade should reinforce the characteristics of the neighborhood: tree lined to make sidewalks pleasant and safe to be on, creating a green vertical street room that is always pleasant to walk down” -Danila Plaza connects the greater Southdale district through this site with a pedestrian-scaled greenway featuring a mix of native landscape, paths with seating, and spaces primed for community events and art installations. This path connects further west to the beautified retention basin nature area, and to the north-south accessible pedestrian path connecting 72nd Street to Gallagher. SKETCH PLAN FEEDBACK &RESPONSES - April 13th Planning CommissionMeeting - April 19th City Council Meeting 31 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 LANDSCAPE& PUBLIC REALM: As the GreaterSouthdale Area Plan states,“a framework emerges for how streets and the public realm will be structured, the relationship of open space to buildings, and how together the designed environment will support the desired experience outcome.” The landscape design put forth as part of this development establishes a public realm that responds to the districts design guidelines. Developing street rooms, creating community space as a focal point, strengthening connections, and addressing the human scale through aestheticquality, safety,and promotion of social interaction. The design is organized around human activity, with vibrant pedestrian-focused streets, beautiful public spaces, and highlights storm water as a valued resource by making it part of the experience of the development. A more inviting walking experience along the streets is created through wide sidewalks and dedicated pedestrian street (Danila Plaza), with seating areas interspersed along the ADA accessible ramp that allows pedestriansto easily move throughoutentirety of site. These spaces between the buildings establish a network of green spaces that support the health and wellbeing of the community. The desired “Street Room Typologies” connect the development, linking experiences together from one end of the site to the other.ThisStreetRoom form createa continuous,safe,and inviting pedestrian experience along corridors and support “pools of human activity” balancing access and mobility. The streetscape is comprised of planting beds with shrubs, perennials and trees will establish the buffer along all public sidewalks between street and walk increasing permeable surface area, providing a shade canopy, and reducing solar heat gain. Plants selected for the Street Rooms are species that will tolerate the harsh conditions of their environment. Trees and plants within these areas are salt- tolerant which help to improve their longevity. Several of the tree species selected for the rest of the site are either native to Minnesota or are adapted species of natives that are better suited for their location or condition. 32 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 LANDSCAPE PLAN - ADAPATH 'I IIII (I \•III III III II •I f \ L -- �� ---J;J ..! 0 0 0 0 INFILTRATION BASIN 0 0 IGREENSPACE . • "·,t· 1. • :.._:...:.·•· . • •·.' /I OVERLOOK FEATURE CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS 0 0 = 0 FUTURE MOTORCOURT • MOTORCOURT 59 • t t t n 0--+0 --+ ADA ROUTES ADA ROUTES 0 I rr L 0(_ 0(_ 0(_ 0(_ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 7200 • •.. .. ............. .. ............. ...........�..�,.,�.. -............. 7250DEVELOPMENT 0 • 0 I� I1111 I • 0 . 08 ••••• • ••• ••• COURTYARD.•. •. •••sot i .)••• f• �❖a .... •• .. •••••r: •.•.•.._J ....."''•j- l..•. ....• • • • •• •• • • • •.1·•• ••••••• •I • ••• 0 0 0I• • •I• • •' 0 I I ASEMENT.Tl(I �, < < rll: I I Q '31DEWALKI N(") •••••••'II II:II: •••••ll• •II 0 i�\\•II\\ I PUBLIC ART/ ELEMENTI I • r.•:0 J'p 0 Q)><( uQ)c�ro,__" \\\\. \ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\I\\\\\\ \\\\\I1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ II II 0 �-CONSTftl.lCtlON LIMITS1\ 0 kI I 33 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 CIVILNARRATIVE SUMMARY: The proposed site layout includes placement of one building separated from a future building pad by a pedestrian-only connection. On-street parking, lined with landscaping will allow access and passage for pedestrians and vehicles to easily access the front entry. Crosswalks and signage will allow for controlled crossing of pedestrians with vehicles and connect to surrounding trails and public pathways. Parking for the proposed building will be met with underground parking and limitedsurface parking. GRADING: Grading around the site will match in with existing grades along the perimeter. All sidewalks and plazas within the site will be graded to ADA standards. Surface water will be directed to the on-site stormwater infiltration/detentionbasin. UTILITIES: Sanitaryandwaterservicesforthe 7250 buildingwillconnectto the site along the south property line from Gallagher Drive. A proposed water line will be brought throughthe site from Gallagher Drive to provide the required fire hydrants and the water service for the 7200 building. The proposed sanitary service for the 7200 building will come from the north off of 72nd St. Stormwater runoff from the buildings and impervious surfaces will be directed to the on- site stormwater infiltration/detention basin. The stormwater basin is designed to provide the required water abstraction, rate control and water quality control. Large rainfall events will be pumped to the existing storm sewer system in 72nd St. from the stormwater basin. 15 GallagherDrive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) StConc. WalkW(A7Pub2licnR/Wd)F24" RCP 24" RCP6"18" RCP 34 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 PROPOSED TOPO + DRAINAGE Conc. Walk 24" RCP6" CIP 24" RCP18" RCP Project Number: Issue Date:Revision Date: 4931 W. 35TH ST.,#200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394www.CivilSiteGroup.com 7200-7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN FLOOD ZONE - PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP DA421419 Revision Number: 6/30/22 1 9/7/22 N 42% OFDRAINAGE AREA SERVES NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 35 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 SITEPHOTOMETRICS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.2 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.0 2.7 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.4 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.5 2.7 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.6 3.1 2.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.3 4.1 3.9 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 0.9 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.4 3.8 4.0 5.0 4.8 3.3 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.7 2.5 3.3 4.0 4.4 4.8 6.2 6.0 4.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.6 3.6 4.4 4.8 5.4 7.2 6.9 4.5 3.8 3.3 3.1 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.9 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.7 3.7 4.5 4.9 5.5 7.2 6.9 4.6 3.8 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.4 4.8 5.3 6.5 6.2 4.3 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 0.9 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.6 3.4 4.1 4.6 5.0 6.2 5.7 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.3 3.8 4.2 4.7 5.6 5.3 3.6 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.1 0.9 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.2 3.7 4.1 4.6 5.9 5.3 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.5 3.3 3.8 4.2 4.7 5.8 5.2 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.2 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.7 3.5 4.1 4.6 5.1 6.1 5.6 3.8 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.0 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 2.0 2.8 3.8 4.5 5.0 5.4 6.6 6.2 4.2 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.1 3.0 4.0 4.9 5.4 5.9 7.4 7.1 4.8 4.0 3.5 3.6 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.7 0.8 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.1 3.1 4.2 5.1 5.6 6.2 8.2 7.7 5.1 4.1 3.6 3.5 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.5 6.1 7.9 7.5 5.0 4.1 3.5 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.0 2.9 3.9 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.9 6.6 4.5 3.8 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.4 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.9 2.7 3.6 4.3 4.8 5.3 6.5 5.8 4.0 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.0 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.6 3.4 3.9 4.3 4.8 5.7 5.4 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.2 3.8 4.1 4.6 5.9 5.3 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.2 3.8 4.1 4.6 5.7 5.2 3.5 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.5 3.3 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.9 5.5 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.2 4.7 5.1 6.3 5.9 4.1 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.3 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.51.9 1.8 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.7 3.7 4.5 4.9 5.4 6.9 6.6 4.5 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.1 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.1 2.1 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 2.7 3.7 4.5 4.9 5.5 7.4 7.1 4.6 3.8 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.7 1.8 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.6 3.5 4.3 4.7 5.1 6.8 6.5 4.3 3.6 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 2.0 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.6 2.3 3.1 3.7 4.1 4.4 5.5 5.4 3.7 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.7 4.6 4.3 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.3 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.4 3.0 2.8 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.8 2.5 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 2.2 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 2.4 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.2 2.0 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.6 1.9 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.9 2.8 3.3 3.9 3.7 3.6 4.0 3.8 3.8 4.3 4.1 4.1 3.8 2.0 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.3 2.8 3.7 4.6 5.6 5.3 5.2 5.8 5.5 5.4 6.0 5.6 4.9 4.0 2.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.6 3.2 4.5 5.8 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.8 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.5 5.5 4.1 2.5 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.4 3.7 5.5 6.5 7.7 7.3 7.2 7.9 7.4 7.3 8.0 7.2 6.2 4.7 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.2 6.3 7.2 7.1 7.0 7.4 7.2 7.1 7.5 6.9 5.8 4.2 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 3.2 4.4 5.7 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.0 5.1 3.7 2.2 2.3 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 5.0 5.2 4.5 2.7 4.5 2.2 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.3 1.7 2.4 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.6 2.0 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.2 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 D1 D1 D1 D118'-0"18'-0"18'-0"18'-0" D1 D1 D1 D118'-0"18'-0"18'-0"18'-0" P2 P120'-0" 20'-0" P2 P120'-0" 20'-0" W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W11.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 W11.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W11.5 1.7 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0W1W1W1W1W1W1 P2 P1 W1 W1 W1 W110'-0"10'-0"W110'-0"1.7 1.6 1.9 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0" W110'-0" W110'-0" 10'-0"2.4 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 10'-0"2.0 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 10'-0" 10'-0"1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"1.6 1.1 1.1 1.510'-0"10'-0"10'-0" W110'-0" W110'-0" W110'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" 10'-0" W110'-0" W110'-0" SCALE: 1" =20'-0" ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRICPLAN1 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min EAST PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.09 0.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. NORTH PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. Site Calc Illuminance Fc 0.95 8.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. SOUTH PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.56 1.0 0.1 5.60 10.00 WEST PROPERTY LINES Illuminance Fc 0.11 0.5 0.0 N.A. N.A. Front Drive Illuminance Fc 2.81 8.0 0.5 5.62 16.00 36A E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 VIEW FROMSOUTHWEST 36B E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 VIEW FROMSOUTHWEST 37 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 VIEW FROMNORTHEAST 38 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 VIEW FROMGALLAGHER 39 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 VIEW FROM FRANCE AVE 40 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 7250 ENTRY & DROPOFF 41 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 VIEW FROM PLAZA TOSOUTH 42 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 THANK YOU! 43 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 7250 - WEST ELEVATION LEVEL1859' -6" LEVEL2879' -6" LEVEL3893' -6" LEVEL4907' -6" LEVEL5921' -6" ROOF P1849' -6"8' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"20' -0"10' -0"10' -0"WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL 935' -6" ZINC FLAT LOCKCLADDING ARCHITECTURALPRECAST ROOF TERRACEW/GLASS GUARDRAIL STONE BASE SPANDREL PANEL WINDOW WALL SYSTEM METALFLASHING CURTAINWALL ARCHITECTURALPRECAST STONE BASE WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL SCREENED MECHANICALAREA BRICK ALUMINUMPUNCHED WINDOWS 62' -0"48' -0"LIGHT FIXTURE ALUMINUMPUNCHED WINDOW MECHPENTHOUSE943' -6" LEVEL1859' -6" LEVEL2879' -6" LEVEL3893' -6" LEVEL4 P1849'-6" LEVELP2839' -6" WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL 8' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"20' -0"76' -0"STONE BASE FLASHING 907'-6" ALUMINUM PUNCHEDWINDOWS BRICK METALPANEL STONE BASE EXTENTSOF PARKINGSHOWNDASHED WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL ARCHITECTURALPRECAST WINDOW WALL SYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL LEVEL5921'-6" ROOF TERRACEW/GLASS GUARDRAIL CURTAINWALL ALUMINUMPUNCHED WINDOWS ARCHITECTURALPRECAST EXTENTS OFPARKING SHOWN DASHED SCREENED MECHANICALAREA MECHPENTHOUSE943'-6" ZINC FLAT LOCKCLADDING ROOF935'-6"84' -0"7250 - EASTELEVATION 44 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 7250 - SOUTHELEVATION LEVEL 1859' -6" LEVEL2879' -6" LEVEL 3893' -6" LEVEL 4907' -6" LEVEL 5921' -6" ROOF935' -6" P1849' -6" LEVEL P2839' -6"10' -0"10' -0"20' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"8' -0"CURTAINWALL ARCHITECTURALPRECAST STONEBASE EXTENTSOFPARKINGSHOWNDASHED ROOFTERRACE W/GLASSGUARDRAIL SCREENED MECHANICAL AREA METAL PANEL AT CANOPY 84' -0"WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL ZINC FLAT LOCKCLADDING ROOF TERRACE W/GLASSGUARDRAIL RAMP ALUMINUM PUNCHEDWINDOWS BRICK WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL PUNCHED ALUMINUMWINDOWS ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST EXTENTS OF PARKINGSHOWNDASHED STAIR TOWER (ROOFACCESS) MECH PENTHOUSE943' -6" LEVEL1859' -6" LEVEL2879' -6" LEVEL3893' -6" LEVEL4 LEVEL5921' -6" ROOF935' -6" P1849' -6"8' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"14' -0"20' -0"10' -0"76' -0"ROOF TERRACEW/GLASSGUARDRAIL METAL PANEL ATCANOPY WINDOW WALLSYSTEM SPANDREL PANEL BRICK ARCHITECTURALPRECAST STONE BASE 907'-6" ALUMINUM PUNCHEDWINDOWS SPANDREL PANEL WINDOW WALLSYSTEM CURTAINWALL ALUMINUMPUNCHED WINDOWS SCREENED MECHANICALAREA MECHPENTHOUSE943'-6"ZINC FLAT LOCKCLADDING 84' -0"7250 - NORTHELEVATION 45 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 7250 - EXTERIORMATERIALS LEVEL 1 MATERIALS LEVELS 2-5MATERIALS ROOFMATERIALS HYBRID WINDOW WALL - SSGSYSTEM ARCHTECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR1 STONEBASE METAL PANEL - COLOR1 METAL PANEL - COLOR1HYBRID WINDOW WALL - SSGSYSTEM ARCHITECTURALBRICK METAL PANEL - COLOR2 FLAT LOCK ZINCPANEL 46 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 LEVEL1 LEVEL2879' -6" A LEVEL3893' -6" LEVEL4907' -6" LEVEL5921' -6" 935' -6" 859' -6" P1849' -6" B C E F H LEVELP2839' -6" D G P1ENTRY TEMPORARY SURFACE PARKING SHOWNDASHED BEYOND 25' -0" SETBACK FROMCURB28' -0"48' -0"20' -0"FIRSTFLRMECHPENTHOUSE943' - 6" ROOF 42' -0"79' -0" TOP OFROOF84' -0"T.O.PENTHOUSEDANILASTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY: PROMENADES AND TRANSITION ZONES GALLAGHERDRIVE STREETROOM TYPOLOGY: TRANSITION ZONE DANILAPLAZAPEDESTRIANWALKWAY W72ND STREET STREETROOM TYPOLOGY: TRANSITION ZONE LEVEL1 LEVEL2879' -6" LEVEL3893' -6" LEVEL4907' -6" 65 859' -6" P1849' -6" LEVEL P2839' -6" 321 4 STORMWATERRETENTION SETBACK FROMCURB 50' -0" 7 8 FRANCEAVENUESTREET ROOMTYPOLOGY: #1A WEST PROMENADE/TRANSITION TOCORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD RAMP(BEYOND)48' -0"SETBACK LEVEL5921' -6" 15' -0"28' -0"78' SETBACK FROM INTERNALSTREET 35' INTERNALSTREET 5' - 91/4"62' -0"14' -0"MECHPENTHOUSE943' -6"ROOF935' -6"84' -0"PEDESTRIAN 12' -0"WALKWAY NEW NORTH-SOUTH LOCALSTREET:STREET ROOMTYPOLOGY: #3 NEW LOCALSTREETS 1PHASE 1 - NORTH / SOUTH SITESECTION A0.5 1/16" =1'-0" 2PHASE 1 - EAST / WEST SITE SECTION AT DANILA A0.5 1/16" =1'-0" 7250 - SITESECTIONS 47 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 A 859' -6" P1849' -6" B C E F H LEVELP2 D G P1ENTRY856' - LEVEL 1 PHASE2 60' -0" POTENTIAL FUTURE MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL & RETAIL BUILDING POTENTIAL BELOW-GRADE PARKING STRUCTURE84' -0"P1ENTRY 48' -0"MECHPENTHOUSE 3' -6"20' -0"DANILASTREET ROOMTYPOLOGY:PROMENADES AND TRANSITIONZONES GALLAGHERDRIVE 943' -6"ROOF 935' -6" LEVEL5 921' -6" LEVEL4 79' -0"84' -0"907' -6" STREET ROOMTYPOLOGY: TRANSITIONZONE LEVEL3 893' -6" 25'-6"SETBACK FROM CURB LEVEL2 879' -6" LEVEL1 DANILAPLAZAPEDESTRIAN WALKWAY 839' -6" W72ND STREET STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY: TRANSITION ZONE 1PHASE 2 - NORTH / SOUTH SITESECTION A0.6 1/16" =1'-0" 7250 - SITESECTIONS 48 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 A 6 5 B C E F H 3 2 1 [NoSlope](-25) D 78 G 14' - 23/4"36' -0"36' -0"36' -0"26' -0"36' -0"36' -0"6' - 101/4" 17' - 63/4"46' -0"12' -0" 12' -0"46' -0"30' -0"46' -0"8' - 11/2" AREA OF OFFICEBUILDING(ABOVE) SHOWNSHADED 10' -6"SLOPEDOWNFLATFLATFLATFLATFLATSLOPEDOWNSLOPEDOWNDEADEND4217' - 81/4"227' -1"P1PARKING:110STALLS P2PARKING: 109STALLS TOTALBELOW GRADE PARKING: 219STALLS A 6 5 B C E F H 3 2 1 ENTRANCE TOP1:849.5' (-15) TRANSFER BEAMCONDITION AT HATCHEDAREAS D 78 17' - 63/4"46' -0"12' -0" 12' -0"46' -0"30' -0"46' -0"8' - 11/2" G 14' - 23/4"36' -0"36' -0"36' -0"26' -0"36' -0"36' -0"217' - 81/4" AREA OF OFFICEBUILDING(ABOVE) SHOWNSHADED CHILLERS&ELEC FIRESUPRESSIONSLOPEDOWNFLATFLATFLATFLATFLATSLOPEDOWNSLOPEDOWNDOWN TOP210' -6"227' -1"P1PARKING: 110STALLS P2PARKING: 109STALLS TOTALBELOWGRADE PARKING:219STALLS 8' -6" 1LEVEL P2 FLOOR PLAN A1.1 1/16" =1'-0" 2LEVEL P1 FLOOR PLAN A1.1 1/16" =1'-0" 7250 - FLOORPLANS 49 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022NO PARKING DROP OFFAREA A 6 5 B C E F H 3 2 1 1A2.1 3A2.2 1A2.4 1A2.3 4 COVERED DROPOFF D 78 G 46' - 0"12' -0" 12' -0" 14' -0"32' - 0"30' - 0"46' - 0" 192' -0"6' - 10" 10' - 6"25' -6"36' -0"36' -0"26' -0"36' -0"36' -0"JANITOR ELEC WOMENMEN NORTH STAIR SOUTH STAIR EXIT CORRIDOR TRASHSTORAGE MECHANICAL ELEVATOR LOBBY RETAIL /COFFEE BUILDING LOUNGE BUILDING LOBBY SECURITY BUILDING AMENITY TOTAL ON- GRADEPARKING: 15 STALLS TENANT 2 6' - 101/4" BIKE STORAGE(6) PARKING SPACES BIKE STORAGE(8)PARKING SPACES A 5 B C E F H 3 2 1 1A2.1 3A2.2 1A2.4 6' -0"46' -0"30' -0"46' -0"6' -0" 4 MECH.6' -0"36' -0"36' -0"36' -0"26' -0"36' -0"36' -0"6' -0"218' -0"STAIR#2 134' -0" D G 1LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN & SITEPLAN A1.2 1/16" =1'-0" 2LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN A1.2 1/16" =1'-0" 7250 - FLOORPLANS 50 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 A 5 B C E F H 3 2 1 1A2.1 3A2.2 1A2.4 1A2.3 4 D G 6' - 0" 14' - 0"32' -0"30' -0"46' -0"6' -0" 134' -0"6' -0"36' -0"36' -0"36' -0"26' -0"36' -0"36' -0"6' -0"218' -0"MECH. STAIR#2 A 5 B C E F H 3 2 1 1A2.1 3A2.2 1A2.4 1A2.3 4 TRANSFER BEAM CONDITION ATHATCHED AREAS D MECH. STAIR#2 14' -0"32' -0"30' -0"46' -0"6' -0" 119' - 01/2"6' -0"36' -0"36' -0"36' -0"26' -0"36' -0"36' -0"6' -0"1' - 17/8"216' - 101/8" G STAIR#2 ROOF TERRACE UNOCC.GREENROOF UNOCC.GREENROOF 1LEVEL 3 FLOORPLAN A1.3 1/16" = 1'-0" 2LEVEL 4 FLOORPLAN A1.3 1/16" = 1'-0" 7250 - FLOORPLANS 53 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 LANDSCAPE PLAN - PHASE1A I' I _/ l"�,\, 1/ ';I '.:::: I 0 1/I/.'s- 0JI"1\1A\-�0 0 0 � INFILTRATION BASIN 0 , ) f 4' ) 0 '\ I I I GREENSPACE .J,��! \L . v" • 0 OVERLOOK FEATURE 0 I IIrI #I l[oIr 11I'0 l III 0 MOTORCOURT L ,7 o_=� p;·• '1 ,I &-:� ' . :l 0 TEMPORARY OPENSPACE 0 0(__ 0(__ 0(__ 0(__ 7250DEVELOPMENT - 0 0 ,I � .1,,'\ �1'¾'1 ]1 ' 1J II'III �. 08 0�I I - �COURTYARD 0 0 0 \ l 0 0 PUBLIC ART/ ,ELBMENT < lC < ll II f - - ' - - H \ -- I \\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\I\\\\\\\\\\\I\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ IIII I I---=-� I I - 0 QJ>< ( : .�:-I r COURTYARD ccuii'.:,.LLL 0 l 0❖❖ 8,' /�0 �-ru •"•, �gl;.�I --«I ««- I �IBIIAA --_-_•:� ; -- r - - - - so- - - - - - - - - __JI -� � � �I\' -, ' ' ,'/"",',�-I 54 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 LANDSCAPE PLAN - PHASE1B -w/ (UPANDSCAP DAT E E L sheets Æ �1 �::'.::£ - "\;''\, 1/',.-----f>s:4--L-3:'iiiL_',:,,-==' �"" lj/t/1\1\'.: �- 0 0 0 0 INFILTRATION BASIN 0 100 0 \ ' 0 [i_REEN SPACE 0 0 MOTORCOURT 00 �� ¼ f f f ~ III�1I�'- '<�I,,:�!I-._,\" \0 0 TEMPORARY PARKING 0 0 0 L --0- 0L 0L 0L L -COURTYARD 7250DEVELOPMENT l 0 V,/�t""."?JJ�•v r>s '; \I' �">,"� \❖08 I ICOURTYARD 8110- .,,,-,;I' 00I.t1 0❖ 0 I l '"I 'III 0�I I - I I l 0 1 0 PUBLIC ART/ \E,LBMENT __ \0';1''iIJ1 I 'I• a0 0 / COURTYARD=I 1B] 0LI 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I �, < l IC ' <rl: l 'III II\i �II\\\ \\ \\\\ \\\ \\\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\ I\\\1\\I \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ ll \\\\\\\ \\ \\ II 11 < 55 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 LANDSCAPE PLAN - PHASE2 56 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 Gallagher Drive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) S89°48'06"W125.00 S00°11'54"E 237.22N00°11'54"W 268.50 Conc. Walk W(A7Pub2licnR/Wd)StL Fra(24" RCP 24" RCP6" CIP 18" RCP MAKE CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EX. SANMH. PER CITY STANDARDS. COORD. W/ CITY AS NEEDED RIM=858.70EX IE (W)=842.70 (FIELD VERIFY) PROP IE (N)=842.70 35 LF 8" SCH40 PVC SAN.SERV.@ 2.00% 8" COMBINEDWATERSERVICE. CONSTRUCT PERCITY OF EDINASPECIFICATIONS,DETAILSANDSTANDARDS. STUB TO 5'FROM BLDG., COORD.W/MECH'L. CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB. VERIFY SIZE IS 8".WET TAP CONNECTIONW/ VALVE TO EXISTINGCITYWATERMAIN 8" PVC SAN.SEWERSERVICE. CONSTRUCT PERCITY OF EDINASPECIFICATIONS, DETAILSANDSTANDARDS. STUB TO 5' FROM BLDG.IE @STUB=843.40 8" COMBINED WATER SERVICE. CONSTRUCT PER CITY OF EDINA SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILS AND STANDARDS. STUB TO 5' FROM BUILDING., COORD. W/MECH'L. CBMH 2 RIM=848.10 IE=843.42 SUMP=839.42 INSTALLSAFL BAFFLE ANDHOODHYDRANT ANDGVPERCITY STANDARDS CB1212" NYLOPLAST DRA RIM=853.19 IE=850.19 CB1112" NYLOPLAST DRAI RIM=852.96 IE=850.01 CB1312" NYLOPLAST DRAIN RIM=855.73IE=850.93 CBMH 4 RIM=852.74 IE (N)=849.04 IE (S)=849.75 IE(W)=848.63 CB612" NYLOPLAST DRA RIM=852.82 IE=849.83 CB712" NYLOPLAST DRAI RIM=853.09 IE=850.09 RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLANFORLOW POINTSOVER BUILDING RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'LANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING 69 LF 18"HDPESTORM @14.96% 68 LF 18"HDPESTORM @6.19% 178 LF 18" SCH40PVCSTORM @ 2.00% 110 LF 15" SCH40PVCSTORM @1.50% CBMH 3 RIM=855.30 IE=846.98 CB512" NYLOPLAST DRAIN RIM=852.55IE=849.17 26 LF 12"HDPESTORM @ 0.50% 61 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 35 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 147 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 132 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 51 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% CB31RIM=840.78IE=837.78 FES 51 IE=834.97 PUMP STATION1RE=842.90 IE (S)=832.73 (FIELDVERIFY) IE (NW-OUTLET)=UNKNOWN(FIELDVERIFY) IE (NE& SE)=832.47 PUMP TO TURNONAT ELEVATION833.10.CONNECT TOEXISTINGSTORM PIPES.MAX PUMP FLOW AT 0.50 CFS.OORD. W/CONTRACTOR FORFINAL PUMPSYSTEMDESIGN 25 LF 12" SCH40PVCSTORM @0.50% MH 24 RIM=847.77 IE=837.65 68 LF 12" SCH 40PVCSTORM @0.50% MH23RIM=847.79IE=839.89 CBMH22RIM=845.09 IE(W/SE)=837.31IE(NE)=839.62 SUMP=834.31 INSTALLSAFL BAFFLE ANDHOOD MH 42 RIM=854.32 IE=849.82 MH41RIM=848.88 48 LF 18" SCH40PVCSTORM @2.00% IE=844.38 RIM=858.77 SEEARCH'LAND MECH'LPLANFOR LOW POINTSOVERBUILDING 135 LF 18"HDPESTORM @4.00% 55 LF 12" SCH40PVCSTORM @0.50% 8" DIP WATERMAIN BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUBIE=837.71BLDG IE=837.81 COORD. W/MECH'L BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUB IE=839.95 BLDG IE=840.05 COORD. W/MECH'L S89°57'11"E 300.00 BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUBIE=844.44BLDG IE=844.54 COORD. W/MECH'L BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMPCONNECTION.STUB IE=849.88 BLDG IE=849.98 COORD. W/MECH'L FIREDEPARTMENT CONNECTION, COORD.W/MECH'L. 8" DIP WATERMAIN FES61 IE=831.60 55 LF 12"HDPESTORM @1.50% FES1 IE=833.10 FES21 IE=833.10 UTILITIES - PHASE1A GRADING - PHASE1A CIVIL - PHASE1A Gallagher Drive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) S89°48'06"W125.00 S00°11'54"E 237.22N00°11'54"W 268.50 S89°57'11"E 300.00 Conc. Walk W(A7Pub2licnR/Wd)St Fra(24" RCP 24" RCPL6" CIP 18" RCP 57 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 Gallagher Drive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) S89°48'06"W125.00 S00°11'54"E 237.22N00°11'54"W 268.50 Conc. Walk W(A7Pub2licnR/Wd)StL Fra(24" RCP 24" RCP6" CIP 18" RCP MAKE CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EX. SANMH. PER CITY STANDARDS. COORD. W/ CITY AS NEEDED RIM=858.70EX IE (W)=842.70 (FIELD VERIFY) PROP IE (N)=842.70 35 LF 8" SCH40 PVC SAN.SERV.@ 2.00% 8" COMBINEDWATERSERVICE. CONSTRUCT PERCITY OF EDINASPECIFICATIONS,DETAILSANDSTANDARDS. STUB TO 5'FROM BLDG., COORD.W/MECH'L. CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB. VERIFY SIZE IS 8".WET TAP CONNECTIONW/ VALVE TO EXISTINGCITYWATERMAIN 8" PVC SAN.SEWERSERVICE. CONSTRUCT PERCITY OF EDINASPECIFICATIONS, DETAILSANDSTANDARDS. STUB TO 5' FROM BLDG.IE @STUB=843.40 8" COMBINED WATER SERVICE.CONSTRUCTPER CITY OF EDINA SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILSAND STANDARDS. STUB TO 5' FROM BUILDING.,COORD.W/MECH'L. CBMH 2 RIM=848.10 IE=843.42 SUMP=839.42 INSTALLSAFL BAFFLE ANDHOODHYDRANT ANDGVPERCITY STANDARDS CB1212" NYLOPLAST DRA RIM=853.19 IE=850.19 CB1112" NYLOPLAST DRAI RIM=852.96 IE=850.01 CB1312" NYLOPLAST DRAIN RIM=855.73IE=850.93 CBMH 4 RIM=852.74 IE (N)=849.04 IE (S)=849.75 IE(W)=848.63 CB612" NYLOPLAST DRA RIM=852.82 IE=849.83 CB712" NYLOPLAST DRAI RIM=853.09 IE=850.09 RIM=855.30 IE=846.98 RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLANFORLOW POINTSOVER BUILDING RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'LANDMECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING 69 LF 18"HDPESTORM @14.96% 68 LF 18"HDPESTORM @6.19% 178 LF 18" SCH40PVCSTORM @ 2.00% 110 LF 15" SCH40PVCSTORM @1.50% CBMH3 CB512" NYLOPLAST DRAIN RIM=852.55IE=849.17 26 LF 12"HDPESTORM @ 0.50% 61 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 35 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 147 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 132 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 51 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% CB31RIM=840.78IE=837.78 FES 51 IE=834.97 PUMP STATION1RE=842.90 IE (S)=832.73 (FIELDVERIFY) IE (NW-OUTLET)=UNKNOWN(FIELDVERIFY) IE (NE& SE)=832.47 PUMP TO TURNONAT ELEVATION833.10.CONNECT TOEXISTINGSTORM PIPES.MAX PUMP FLOW AT 0.50 CFS.OORD. W/CONTRACTOR FORFINAL PUMPSYSTEMDESIGN 25 LF 12" SCH40PVCSTORM @0.50% MH 24 RIM=847.77 68 LF 12" SCH 40PVCSTORM @0.50% MH23RIM=847.79IE=839.89 CBMH22RIM=845.09 IE(W/SE)=837.31IE(NE)=839.62 SUMP=834.31 INSTALLSAFL BAFFLE ANDHOOD MH 42 RIM=854.32 IE=849.82 MH41RIM=848.88 48 LF 18" SCH40PVCSTORM @2.00% IE=844.38 RIM=858.77 SEEARCH'LAND MECH'LPLANFOR LOW POINTSOVERBUILDING 135 LF 18"HDPESTORM @4.00% 55 LF 12" SCH40PVCSTORM @0.50% 8" DIP WATERMAIN IE=837.65 BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUBIE=837.71BLDG IE=837.81 COORD. W/MECH'L BLDG ROOFDRAIN AND SUMPPUMPCONNECTION. STUBIE=839.95 BLDGIE=840.05COORD. W/MECH'L S89°57'11"E 300.00 BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUBIE=844.44BLDG IE=844.54 COORD. W/MECH'L BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMPCONNECTION.STUB IE=849.88 BLDG IE=849.98 COORD. W/MECH'L FIREDEPARTMENT CONNECTION, COORD.W/MECH'L. 8" DIP WATERMAIN FES61 IE=831.60 55 LF 12"HDPESTORM @1.50% FES1 IE=833.10 FES21 IE=833.10 UTILITIES - PHASE1B GRADING - PHASE1B CIVIL - PHASE1B Gallagher Drive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) S89°48'06"W125.00 S00°11'54"E 237.22N00°11'54"W 268.50 S89°57'11"E 300.00 Conc. Walk W(A7Pub2licnR/Wd)St Fra(24" RCP 24" RCPL6" CIP 18" RCP 58 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | P.U.D. C.C. MEETING - 7200 & 7250 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 9.20.2022 Gallagher Drive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) S89°48'06"W125.00 S00°11'54"E 237.22N00°11'54"W 268.50 W 72nd StL Fra(24" RCP 24" RCP6" CIP 18" RCP MAKE CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EX. SANMH. PER CITY STANDARDS. COORD. W/ CITY AS NEEDED RIM=858.70EX IE (W)=842.70 (FIELD VERIFY) PROP IE (N)=842.70 35 LF 8" SCH40 PVC SAN.SERV.@ 2.00% STUB SANITARY TO5' FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=850.26 COORD.W/MECH'L MAKE CORE DRILL ANDSADDLE-TEEConc. Walk CONNECTION TO EX.24" RCPSANITARY PER CITY OF EDINA(ASPTubAlNic DRA/WR)DS ANDSPECIFICATIONS.COORD. W/ CITY AS NEEDEDEX IE (E/W)=848.65 (FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE(S)=849.32 47 LF 8" SCH40 PVC SAN. SERV. @2.00% 8" COMBINEDWATERSERVICE. CONSTRUCT PERCITY OF EDINASPECIFICATIONS, DETAILSANDSTANDARDS. STUB TO 5'FROM BLDG., COORD.W/MECH'L. CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER STUB. VERIFY SIZE IS 8".WET TAP CONNECTIONW/ VALVE TO EXISTINGCITYWATERMAIN 8" PVC SAN.SEWERSERVICE. CONSTRUCT PERCITY OF EDINASPECIFICATIONS, DETAILSANDSTANDARDS. STUB TO 5' FROM BLDG.IE @STUB=843.40 HYDRANT ANDGVPERCITY STANDARDS 8" COMBINED WATER SERVICE. CONSTRUCT PER CITY OF EDINA SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILS AND STANDARDS. STUB TO 5' FROM BUILDING., COORD. W/MECH'L. CBMH 2 RIM=848.10 IE=843.42 SUMP=839.42 INSTALLSAFLBAFFLE ANDHOOD CB1212" NYLOPLAST DRA RIM=853.19 IE=850.19 CB1112" NYLOPLAST DRAI RIM=852.96 IE=850.01 CB1312" NYLOPLAST DRAIN RIM=855.73IE=850.93 CBMH 4 RIM=852.74 IE (N)=849.04 IE (S)=849.75 IE(W)=848.63 CB612" NYLOPLAST DRA RIM=852.82 IE=849.83 CB712" NYLOPLAST DRAI RIM=853.09 IE=850.09 RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING RIM=858.27SEE ARCH'L AND MECH'L PLAN FOR LOW POINTSOVER BUILDING 69 LF 18"HDPESTORM @14.96% 68 LF 18"HDPESTORM @6.19% 178 LF 18" SCH40PVCSTORM @ 2.00% 110 LF 15" SCH40PVCSTORM @1.50% CBMH 3 RIM=855.30 IE=846.98 CB512" NYLOPLAST DRAIN RIM=852.55IE=849.17 26 LF 12"HDPESTORM @ 0.50% 61 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 35 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 147 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 132 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% 51 LF 12"HDPESTORM @0.50% FES 51 IE=834.97 PUMP STATION1RE=842.90 IE (S)=832.73 (FIELDVERIFY) IE (NW-OUTLET)=UNKNOWN(FIELDVERIFY) IE (NE& SE)=832.47 PUMP TO TURNONAT ELEVATION833.10.CONNECT TOEXISTINGSTORM PIPES.AX PUMP FLOW AT 0.50 CFS.OORD. W/CONTRACTOR FORINAL PUMPSYSTEMDESIGN MH 24 RIM=847.77 IE=837.65 68 LF 12" SCH 40PVCSTORM @0.50% MH 23 RIM=847.79 IE=839.89 CBMH 22 RIM=845.09IE(W/SE)=837.31 IE(NE)=839.62 SUMP=834.31 INSTALLSAFL BAFFLE ANDHOOD MH 42 RIM=854.32 IE=849.82 48 LF 18" SCH40PVCSTORM @2.00% MH 41 RIM=848.88 IE=844.38 RIM=858.77 SEEARCH'LAND MECH'LPLANFOR LOW POINTSOVERBUILDING 135 LF 18"HDPESTORM @4.00% 55 LF 12" SCH40PVCSTORM @0.50% 8" DIP WATERMAIN BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUBIE=837.71BLDG IE=837.81 COORD. W/MECH'L BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUB IE=839.95 BLDG IE=840.05 COORD. W/MECH'L S89°57'11"E 300.00 BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMP CONNECTION. STUBIE=844.44BLDG IE=844.54 COORD. W/MECH'L BLDG ROOF DRAIN AND SUMP PUMPCONNECTION.STUB IE=849.88 BLDG IE=849.98 COORD. W/MECH'L FIREDEPARTMENT CONNECTION, COORD.W/MECH'L. FIREDEPARTMENT CONNECTION, COORD.W/MECH'L. 8" DIP WATERMAIN FES61 IE=831.60 55 LF 12"HDPESTORM @1.50% FES1 IE=833.10 FES21 IE=833.10 UTILITIES - PHASE2 GRADING - PHASE2 CIVIL - PHASE2 Gallagher Drive(A Public R/W)France Ave(A Public R/W) S89°48'06"W125.00 S00°11'54"E 237.22N00°11'54"W 268.50 S89°57'11"E 300.00 Conc. WalkW 72nd St(A Public R/W)Fra(24" RCP 24" RCPL6" CIP 18" RCP Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Laura Fulton, Recreation Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts and Culture Commission, July 28 and August 25, 2022 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive minutes of the Arts and Culture Commission from July 28 and August 25, 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Arts and Culture Commission, July 28, 2022 Minutes: Arts and Culture Commission, August 25, 2022 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 8/25/2022 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Community Room Thursday, July 28, 2022 I. Call To Order Vice-Chair Rubin called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Amlaw, Fram, Stemmler, Zbaren, Vice Chair Rubin and Student Commissioner Anand Staff Present: Parks and Recreation Director, Perry Vetter, and Recreation Supervisor, Laura Fulton. Commissioner Johnson arrived at 4:45 p.m. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Amlaw to approve the agenda. Motion seconded by Fram. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Amlaw to approve the minutes. Motion seconded by Fram. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations – A. Edina Asian American Alliance Presentation • Kelly Condit-Shresther and Student member Jaden Young presented an outline for a permanent artwork project. The EAAA is seeking funding from the ACC and to be included on the 2023 workplan. • Commission discussed project and asked questions of Condit-Shresther and Young, while also discussing adding plan to their workplan for the upcoming year. B. Commission Introduced new commission member Jennifer Faeth VI. Community Comment A. Isadora Li and ThaoMe Xiong commented in support of the EAAA proposed project. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2021 Work Plan Updates – • Initiative # 1: Healing Circles Digital Public Art Project • Commissioners Fram and Stemmler presented. • There will be a possible division of curation and display. • Artzonia will be utilized to accept submissions and display healing circles online • Initiative #3: Planning process for a new art space Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 8/25/2022 • Director Vetter reported that the Council received the report from Commissioner Westlund. No discussion occurred. Vetter encouraged Commission members to reach out to Council members to discuss. • Initiative #4: Climate Change Public Art in the Parks • Vetter provided information to the Commission. Five poems will be installed in 2022. The sandblasting company is currently working on stencils. • Anand commented on the successful reception of the banners during the Fourth of July parade • Initiative #5: Joint Sponsorship of Performances on the Plaza Summer Concert Series • Stemmler presented and discussed MC’ing the event in July. Commission complimented the curator on a successful series. B. 2023 Arts and Culture Commission Work Plan Development • Commission members brainstormed and came up with a list of ideas for the 2023 workplan. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Staff Comments • Vetter introduced a proposal for the City Staff Work Plan pertaining to Public Art Master Plan. Commission discussed. • Vetter thanked Vice Chair Rubin for serving on the Edina Arts and Culture Commission. X. Adjournment Motion was made by Amlaw to adjourn the July 28, 2022 meeting of the Arts and Culture Commision at 6:43 p.m. Motion seconded by Fram. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 09/22/2022 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Arts and Culture Commission Public Works Multipurpose Room Thursday, August 25, 2022 I. Call To Order Chair Sorensen called the meeting to order at 4:35 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Amlaw, Johnson, Westlund, Fram, Stemmler, Chandler, Faeth, Student Commissioners Anand; and Chair Sorensen. Staff Present: Parks and Recreation Director, Perry Vetter, Parks and Recreation Supervisor, Laura Fulton III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Fram to approve the August 25, 2022 meeting agenda, seconded by Chandler. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Johnson to approve the July 28, 2022 meeting minutes, seconded by Amlaw. Motion carried. V. Special Recognition A. Community Development Director Bill Neuendorf presented plans for upcoming development at 5146 Eden Ave. a. Neuendorf discussed the artwork plan for the future development and invited the ACC to have a seat at the table during the planning and implementation phase. b. ACC discussed the opportunity, Neuendorf recommended that Commission make an advisory communication in support of the project. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. 2022 Work Plan Updates • Initiative #1: Implement Year 2 of the Public Art Plan: Healing Circles • Commissioner Fram reported on initiative #1 and updated commission on curation of Healing Circles initiative. Chair Sorensen reported that all teachers in the elementary schools would be presenting the project during the first week of school and the secondary schools will have options for all students as well. • Commissioner Stemmler discussed the video component of the initiative to ensure accessibility to view project past the October event. • Chair Sorensen promoted the culmination of the event at Kuhlman Field/Community Center during mental health week in October. • Initiative #2: Research and make a recommendation for a microgrant process for community driven Arts & Culture Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 09/22/2022 • Commissioner Chandler reported on research that has been done previously on the microgrant initiative. ACC discussed. • Initiative #3: As a new art space is pursued, the Commission will provide the community perspective to the planning process • Commissioner Westlund discussed the report that the ACC submitted to City Council during their June meeting. Westlund mentioned bringing up the report during community comment at Council meetings to spur on discussion. • ACC discussed other options. • Initiative #4: Public Art Poetry in the Parks 2022 • Staff member Fulton mentioned that the company hired to do the etching is at the State Fair but that we will be walking the sites for etching when he is available and get a timeline solidified. • Commissioner Amlaw mentioned hosting an event celebrating the poets once poems are in the ground. • Initiative #5: Joint Sponsorship of Performances on the Plaza Summer Concert Series 2022 • Chair Sorensen presented that the POP series is hopeful that the City will support the effort in 2023, as the 2022 season wraps up. B. 2023 Workplan Development • Chair Sorensen led the continuing brainstorming the 2023 Workplan • ACC discussed being a partner in the Grandview Yard project • ACC discussed continuum items such as microgrants, Art Center initiative, Healing Circles • Chair Sorensen discussed how Edina having a point of view on the requirements for developers when it comes to public art needs to take a higher priority • Commissioner Stemmler discussed adding a Street Art initiative • Staff member Fulton mentioned a joint venture between ACC and staff to cover city-owned utility boxes with art coverings • ACC weighed options of adding other initiatives and decided to present the following to Council in their 2023 Workplan Recommendation: 1. Grandview Yard partnership 2. Street Art research 3. Art Center 4. Utility Boxes 5. Art Incentive for commercial development 6. Performances on the Plaza VII. Chair And Member Comments • Chair Sorensen invited all members to volunteer for shifts at the Edina Fall into the Arts Festival. • Commissioner Amlaw acknowledged Activities Directory and congratulated staff on new art programming opportunities. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 09/22/2022 VIII. Staff Comments • Updated 2022 Meeting dates were presented. • Staff member Fulton presented upcoming City programming. IX. Adjournment Motion was made by Chandler to adjourn the August 25, 2022 meeting of the Arts and Culture Commission, seconded by Westlund. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: X.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Transportation Commission, August 18, 2022 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive minutes of the Transportation Commission from August 18, 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Transportation Commission, August 18, 2022 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 15, 2022 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room August 18, 2022 I. Call To Order Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Ahler, Lewis, McCarthy, Plumb-Smith, Richman, Rubenstein, Johnson Late: Commissioner Kitui Absent: Commissioners Brown, Clark, Kanti Mahanty Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Chair Johnson and seconded by Commissioner McCarthy to name Commissioner Plumb-Smith Acting Chair for the September 15 regular meeting. All voted aye. Motion carried. Motion was made by Commissioner Richman and seconded by Commissioner Lewis to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioner Kitui arrived at 6:03. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Ahler and seconded by Commissioner Kitui to approve the June 16, 2022 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. Motion was made by Commissioner Lewis and seconded by Commissioner Ahler to approve the July 21, 2022 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Special Recognition – Anna Clark Liaison Scipioni and Commissioners recognized Commissioner Clark for two-years of service on the Transportation Commission. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Traffic Safety Report of July 26, 2022 The Commission reviewed and commented on the Traffic Safety Report of July 26, 2022. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 15, 2022 B. Advisory Communication: Transit Availability The Commission reviewed a draft advisory communication regarding transit availability in Edina. Motion was made by Commissioner McCarthy and seconded by Commissioner Richman to approve the advisory communication to City Council as amended. Ayes: Ahler, Lewis, McCarthy, Plumb-Smith, Richman, Rubenstein, Johnson Abstain: Kitui Motion carried. C. 2022 Work Plan Updates  #1 Tree Boulevard Policy – The Commission reviewed a draft advisory communication supporting the EEC’s proposed tree ordinance amendments. Motion was made by Commissioner Kitui and seconded by Commissioner Plumb- Smith to approve the advisory communication to City Council as amended. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioner Plumb-Smith left at 6:45.  #2 Public Transit Checklist – Not sure that this deliverable is valuable to Planning Commission, as it overlaps with guidance they already have. Future work may include reviewing Planning’s transportation guidance and creating a work plan initiative around that.  #3 PACS Fund Policy – No update.  #4 SRTS Demonstration Projects – Lead resigned, Commission terminated initiative.  #5 TIS Process Review – Lead resigned, Commission terminated initiative.  #6 Transit Connectivity – Commission approved advisory communication on this subject. D. 2023 Work Plan Development The Commission continued discussion of their 2023 work plan proposal. VIII. Chair and Member Comments – Received. Motion was made by Commissioner Richman and seconded by Commissioner McCarthy to approve an advisory communication to City Council on the topic of Rosland Park pedestrian bridge over Highway 62. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioner Lewis left at 8:02. IX. Staff Comments – Received. X. Adjournment Motion was made by Commissioner McCarthy and seconded by Commissioner Ahler to adjourn the August 18, 2022 regular meeting at 8:10 p.m. All voted aye. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 15, 2022 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Kitui, Janet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Plumb-Smith, Jill 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Rubenstein, Tricia 1 1 2 50% Clark, Anna (s) 1 1 2 25% Kanti Mahanty, Stephen (s) 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Kane, Bocar Resigned 0 N/A Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: X.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Advisory Communication: Community Health Commission: Stop the Bleed Initiative Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Receive advisory communication. INTRODUCTION: This report completes a 2022 Community Health Commission work plan item to: "Study and Report feasibility of adopting T he American College of Surgeons' Stop the Bleed program in the City." ATTACHMENTS: Description Advisory Communication: CHC Stop the Bleed Initiative Study and Report Date: October 6, 2022 To: Mayor and Council From: Community Health Commission Subject: Stop the Bleed Work Plan Initiative – Study and Report Action Requested: Receive Report Background: In 2012 Lenworth Jacobs, Jr., MD, the Chair of Trauma Services at Hartford hospital, reviewed autopsies of the victims of the Sandy Hook mass casualty event and came to the conclusion that some of the fatalities may have been preventable. He convened a panel of national experts to evaluate the response to emergencies of this nature. Ultimately the panel produced a report known as the Hartford Consensusref which emphasized the importance of early intervention by bystanders. In particular, the panel recommended the use of compression, preferably with anticoagulant-treated pads, and tourniquets. The panel then convened with Obama administration officials, including representatives of the armed services. When the recommendations were applied by military units in Iraq and Afghanistan, on-field mortality fell from roughly 7% to 2%ref. With those findings, the American college of surgeons, in cooperation with the Department of Defense, initiated the Stop the Bleed® program in October 2016.ref Current status: Stop the Bleed encourages bystanders to become trained, equipped, and empowered to assist in a bleeding emergency before professional help arrives. The program turns ordinary citizens into trained individuals, currently numbering over 1.9 million, who can help victims of any serious hemorrhagic emergency, much in the manner that the American Heart Association has trained millions in CPR techniques. The victim of a bleeding emergency, be it from a mass shooting event, an ice skating laceration, or an automobile crash, can bleed to death within 5 minutes, so it is essential that bystanders take action immediately. As an illustrative example, a bystander placed his belt as a tourniquet above the leg amputation of a victim of the Boston Marathon bombing. That victim was not unconscious from shock but rather was awake and talking as he was wheeled to an ambulance. Edina is not immune from the sort of mass casualty event that has traumatized cities across the US, nor are citizens of the city invulnerable to catastrophic accidents. The optimal approach for Edina is for its citizens to be prepared to potentially save lives in such an event by learning how to control life-threatening hemorrhage. Future potential: The city of Edina can implement regular Stop the Bleed courses, each taught by an instructor. The 90 minute training sessions consist of lecture material followed by practical training in the use of tourniquets and compression packs. The lecture portion of the course is available on line at no chargeref. Each Stop the Bleed course includes hands-on experience with medical mannequins to simulate a bleeding victim. Courses could be held at various City of Edina facilities such as City hall, fire stations, Public Works Building. Instructors, who are trained by the program, are volunteers, so costs to the city Page 2 beyond facility overhead are minimal. After local instructors had been trained, the courses could be advertised through social media, newspapers, City of Edina publications and website, and news items on radio and television. Training for instructors can be obtained by contacting Stop the Bleed at stopthebleed@facs.org. Equipment: While bystanders can save lives by applying their training from Stop the Bleed, ideally they would have rapid access to equipment especially developed to create the greatest opportunity for success. Much as AEDs are now widely available in public places to allow bystanders to defibrillate heart attack victims, kits developed by Stop the Bleed contain the materials to provide optimal emergency care to a bleeding victim. The program has begun a campaign to place kits next to AEDs in other areas of the US. In Edina, kits could be placed in heavily traveled public venues, such as supermarkets, theaters, churches, schools, and shopping malls. A typical kit provides multiple sets of: One (1) tourniquet; 2 latex- free gloves; 1 emergency bandage; 1 pair of trauma shears; 2 rolls of primed and compressed gauze dressing; 1 H*Vent chest seal; 1 permanent marker; 4 Mylar emergency blankets. The City of Edina could encourage local businesses to place Stop the Bleed kits next to the AEDs in their facilities, but the city itself would probably need to invest in kits in order to provide optimal coverage throughout Edina. The Stop the Bleed organization sells enhanced kits for use in public venues for $500- 600 retail (https://www.bleedingkits.org/all-products/enhanced-stop- the-bleed-stations.html). Conclusions: 1) The Stop the Bleed Program provides citizens with knowledge that may save lives of bleeding victims. 2) Local Instructors for the Stop the Bleed program can be trained to administer the program. 3) The feasibility of placing Stop the Bleed kits in strategic locations around the city depends on the willingness of local businesses and public facilities to acknowledge the need for those materials and on the ability of the City of Edina to fund placement in city facilities, particularly schools. 4) Even in the absence of widespread placement of kits, the development of a knowledgeable citizenry will improve the emergent response to life-threatening bleeding from any cause. 5) With authorization from the City Council, the work plan of the Community Health Commission for 2023 can include collaborative work with city administration to initiate the Stop the Bleed program. Date: October 6, 2022 Agenda Item #: XI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Prep Memo for October 6, 2022 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Prep Memo, Oct. 6, 2022 1 Sharon Allison From:Scott H. Neal Sent:Thursday, October 6, 2022 12:39 PM To:jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com; Kevin Staunton; Ron Anderson; James Pierce; Carolyn Jackson Cc:Lisa Schaefer; Sharon Allison Subject:Prep Memo for October 6, 2022 City Council Meeting and Work Session Good Afternoon Everyone – We have an enormous night in store for the Council tonight. If things go as expected, staff estimate adjournment after midnight. Here’s how it looks right now: The work session is our annual opportunity for Board & Commission chairs to make their unmitigated pitch to the Council regarding their desired 2023 Work Plans. Staff will be in the room tonight, but will not comment on the proposals. We will do that in an upcoming Council work session. Tonight is the night for B&C’s to tell you what they want to do and why they want to do it. It’s a lot of content to get through in the one hour we have allocated, so my advice to Council is to listen and ask clarifying questions, but know that you will have more time in the future to discuss and decide these work plans. No decisions on this are required tonight. We have 23 action items on the Consent Agenda. No one has asked for anything to be removed from Consent. If we can answer any questions or concerns about Consent Agenda items prior to the meeting, that would be helpful. It would help keep the overall meeting time more reasonable if we can keep the Consent Agenda together tonight. There are eight public hearings on tights agenda. Seven of them are perfunctory. We may have some comments on the two special assessment hearings, but we know how to handle those. The public hearing that has some level of unpredictability to it is the hearing for the appeal of the HPC’s decision on a Certificate of Appropriateness. Staff have set some time allocations for the staff and applicant presentations, but the public comments are too hard to 2 predict. Asking residents not to repeat common concerns and limiting Scott Busyn from unnecessarily long rebuttals would be too good ways to keep the time managed for this item. Council has the opportunity to make important development decisions tonight for the former City Public Works site and the 7200-7250 France project. Staff anxiously await your direction. See you tonight – Scott Scott H. Neal, City Manager 952-826-0401 | Fax 952-826-0390 sneal@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Follow me on Twitter.