Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-04-04 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, April 4, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearing Call 786-496-5601 Enter Conference 8618997# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak An operator will introduce you when it is your turn I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Mar. 21, 2023 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Request for Purchase: Parks & Recreation Software Annual Service Fee D.Request for Purchase: Aquatic Center Pump Room Design Development E.Request for Purchase: Aquatic Center Changing and Concessions House Concept Design F.Request for Purchase: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project G.Request for Purchase: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Reconstruction Materials Testing H.Request for Purchase: 2023 Construction Observation and Administration Services I.Request for Purchase: Change Order for Fire Station #1 Building Automation System Update J.Sta= Response to Lake Cornelia Tra?c Safety Petition K.Tra?c Safety Report of Feb. 28, 2023 L.Resolution No. 2023-28: Accepting Donation of Automated External DeBbrillators M.Resolution No. 2023-29: Accepting Donation from the Edina Crime Prevention Fund for License Plate Readers N.Heritage Preservation Commission Appointment VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after sta= and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an e?cient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for The Lynhall Edina, LLC, dba The Lynhall No. 3945 B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2023-25: Establishing the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District C.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-26 & Ordinance No. 2023-05, Rezoning 4404 Valley View Road D.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-20, CertiBcate of Appropriateness Appeal, 4630 Drexel Avenue IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2023-27: Accepting Donations B.Resolution No. 2023-22: Conditional Use Permit for U.S. Internet at 6444 Xerxes Avenue C.Resolution No. 2023-16: Subdivision and Development Contract for 4404 Valley View Road D.Sketch Plan Review for 7200 France Avenue, Phase 2 Hotel E.Appoint Council Member Risser to Represent the City on the Noise Oversight Committee X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Minutes: Heritage Preservation Commission, Jan. 9 and Feb. 13, 2023 B.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, Feb. 9, 2023 C.Minutes: Transportation Commission, Feb. 16, 2023 XI.Manager's Comments A.Prep Memo Apr. 4, 2023 XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliBcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Assistant City Manager Schaefer will respond to questions asked at the previous Council meeting. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Mar. 21, 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, Mar. 21, 2023 Minutes: Draft City Council Regular, Mar. 21, 2023 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2023 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:37 pm. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser and Mayor Hovland Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; and Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Center for Energy and Environment: Arbor Otalora-Fadner, Program Coordinator; and Katie Jones, Community Program and Policy Manager Energy and Environment Commissioners: Stephen Schima, and LeAnn Weber TIME OF SALE ENERGY DISCLOSURE AND ELECTRIFY EVERYTHING CAMPAIGN Sustainability Manager Hancock noted time of sale energy disclosure is an Energy and Environment Commission work plan item, and the goal of the discussion is to inform the Commission’s study and report coming to Council later this year. She noted the second topic of the meeting is to inform and gather feedback from Council on the Electrify Everything awareness campaign the City will be kicking off in April with partner cities to help residents take advantage of the Inflation Reduction Act. Arbor Otalora-Fadner presented on time of sale energy disclosure which was a requirement that homes listed for sale must conduct a home energy audit and disclose their energy rating which would result in more informed home buyers and a demand for more efficient homes. City Council asked questions and provided feedback. Katie Jones presented on Electrify Everything Minnesota. This campaign aims to educate residents of Edina, St. Louis Park, Eden Prairie, and Minneapolis about the benefits of replacing natural gas equipment and appliances with electrically powered options. The campaign leaders plan to provide residents with resources to make the switch to electric. City Council asked questions and provided feedback. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:44 pm. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, April 4, 2023. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 21, 2023 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Janet Kitui, 301 Adams Avenue, shared her belief that racism resided and thrived within the City Council and felt she was excluded from appointment to the Planning Commission because she was a black woman. She shared frustrations with being interviewed twice with no appointment and that Member Jackson had dismissed her request for reasons for not being appointed and felt her lived experience was important to the community. She said she felt dismissed and was not a deserving member of the Presidents neighborhood. The Council provided feedback and offered to meet with Ms. Kitui to further discuss her concerns. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal responded to Community Comments at the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the consent agenda as amended, removing VI.C., Ordinance No. 2023-04; Amending Chapter 2 of the City Code, Setting Fees for 2023: VI.A. Approve Minutes of the Worksession and Regular Meeting of March 7, 2023 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List dated March 3, 2023, totaling $950,823.20 and Pre-List dated March 10, 2023, totaling $943,121.05 VI.C. Ordinance No. 2023-04; Amending Chapter 2 of the City Code, Setting Fees for 2023 VI.D. Waive Permit Fees for 50th and France Parking Ramp Repairs VI.E. Request for Purchase; Kaeser Air Compressor, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Kaeser Compressor Inc., $26,830 VI.F. Request for Consideration for Spring Load Limit Exception VI.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-24; Approving Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Grant Application and Agreement VI.H. Request for Purchase; Change Order; Professional Services for Eden Avenue and Grange Road Roundabouts, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, SEH, $265,200 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2023 Page 2 VI.I. Request for Purchase; ENG22016 Eden Avenue and Grange Road Roundabouts, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, SM Hentges and Sons, $1,858,986 VI.J. Request for Purchase; Material Testing for Eden Avenue and Grange Road Roundabouts, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Braun Intertec, $28,424 VI.K. Request for Purchase; ENG 23-3 Natural Areas Long-Term Maintenance 2023-2025, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Landbridge Ecological, $57,378 VI.L. Request for Purchase; Professional Services for City Hall Exterior Improvements and Solar Replacement awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, HGA, $50,650 VI.M. Request for Purchase; FC22-113 City Hall Exterior Improvements and Solar Replacement, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Magnuson Construction, $1,976,352 VI.N. Approve 2023-2024 Union Contract for LELS Local 529 Dispatchers VI.O. Approve 2023-2024 Union Contract for IAFF Local 1275 Firefighters VI.P. Approve Temporary Intoxicating On-Sale Liquor License for Junior League of Minneapolis, Inc. VI.Q. Approve Peoples Organic and El Camino Taco Deli Liquor License Renewals Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA VI.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-04; AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CITY CODE, SETTING FEES FOR 2023 UNDER CHAPTER 28-43B – POSTPONED TO APRIL 4, 2023 Mr. Neal shared this was a technical correction that had inadvertently omitted a class of customers in the utility billing rate structure. Finance Director McAndrews said the requested changes included a new utility rate structure based on the 2022 rate study which was intended to meet City goals to cover costs for the utility system, upgrades, incentivize water conservation, and new infrastructure while making rates affordable for lower volume users. She shared the proposed rates for 2023 compared to 2022 and said the ordinance did not include the $3.62 flat rate for multi-family customers then spoke about proposed rates for sewer as well. She said the schedule adopted in December did not accurately reflect these two fees and had since been communicated to all customers and requested its adoption as originally intended. She shared that staff continued to meet regarding future rate changes as part of the annual budget process which included estimated water uses. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Mayor Hovland, to grant Second Reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2023-04; amending Chapter 2 of the City Code, setting fees for 2023 under Chapter 28-43B. Member Jackson and Mayor Hovland withdrew their motions to allow for further discussion at a worksession. Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Risser, to postpone consideration of Ordinance No. 2023-04; amending Chapter 2 of the City Code, setting fees for 2023 under Chapter 28-43B to the April 4, 2023, meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2023 Page 3 VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-22; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR US INTERNET AT 6444 XERXES AVENUE – CONTINUED TO APRIL 4, 2023 Community Development Director Teague stated US Internet (USI) was requesting a Conditional Use Permit and variance to construct a 1,900 square foot utility building at 6444 Xerxes Avenue. The variance requested was to construct a building with no windows due to security concerns and built with cultured stone and Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) instead of brick or stone entirely. The facility would provide improved internet services to Edina residents. USI currently served the north/northeastern portions of Edina. The new facility would provide internet services to central and southern Edina and therefore cover the entire City. He noted concerns were shared about the proposed building height and mass and the applicant had decreased the height to 18 feet in response. He spoke further about the proposal to connect 65th Street but there are sight line concerns and the County’s goal was to reduce connections. He outlined the proposed extensive landscaping surrounding the site and said the project was code compliant for setback and height and not generate additional traffic within the streets as no customers would be present at the building. He said the Planning Commission’s motion to approve failed 4-4 and that their three conditions were an east/west sidewalk to the south, 18-foot height, and the applicant’s responsibility to replace landscaping in the event any dies. Tim Martin, USI, shared their background which included being privately owned and operated and headquartered in Minnetonka who currently provided residential internet service in portions of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Minnetonka and northeast Edina with the request to expand coverage to the entire City. He shared about the central data center at 3651 Snelling Avenue South and the need for security and restricted access for this structure then spoke about including a sidewalk to provide access to Xerxes. He outlined their proposed materials to maintain consistency with projected projects and the requirement for no windows as part of their security requirements. Tim Meyer, Meyer Group Architects, spoke about their process over the past three years and the proposed building that would include extensive landscape design architecture and exceeded the City’s requirements. He said they were proud of the work to create an attractive building within the current neighborhood and the need to be in a certain geographic area within the City to provide the intended internet service. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:47 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared. Member Jackson moved, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing at noon on March 27, 2023, and continue consideration of Resolution No. 2023-22, Conditional Use Permit and Variance for US Internet at 6444 Xerxes Avenue to the April 4, 2023, meeting. Roll call: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-23; ACCEPTING DONATIONS - ADOPTED Member Pierce introduced and moved adopt of Resolution No. 2023-23, accepting donations. Seconded by Member Jackson. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. SKETCH PLAN FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY CENTER AT 4401 76TH STREET WEST (FIRE STATION 2) – REVIEWED Mr. Teague said the City Council was asked to consider a sketch plan to redevelop the eight-acre site at 4401 76th Street West. The existing 102,031-square foot building would be removed. The main purpose of the redevelopment of this site was for the City to construct a new Community Health and Safety Center. Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2023 Page 4 The building would provide operational space for the Edina Fire Department and Community Health Department and be located on the northern third of the site, with the remaining two-thirds of the site available for redevelopment that could include housing, retail, and public space. Trace Jacques BKV Group, shared progress on the project that would serve as Fire Station 2. He spoke about the guiding work through the Values Viewfinder and their due diligence regarding the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines. He shared the generic site plan and site of the facility that would be located on 8.02 acres and include an existing wetland in the southwest corner of the site. He shared the City’s mission and purpose to establish a multi-use municipal landmark that was welcoming to Edina’s diverse community and create connections between the people and civic services and how the two-story structure would be flexible, adaptable, and push the boundaries of development and design for buildings and provide opportunities for community gathering and a polling place. He outlined the project framing that included goals and objectives, drivers, stakeholders, and what success would look like. He shared the existing conditions of the site within a mixed-use neighborhood, extension of the promenade to Fred Richards Park, and balance with potential development and the need to maintain greenspace. He shared proposed options for building orientation in detail and the need to balance daylighting for the building which would also house firefighters. Fire Chief Slama shared the Five Bugles Report that determined current conditions of 20,000 square feet for programming with the current station at 26,000 square feet and the difference for the new building that included the Public Health Division/Community Health Department as part of being proactive to emergency services demands and an opportunity to add them resulted in the need for additional square footage. He said the project now included a community room for public use and provisions for additional space to accommodate increased call volumes, staffing, and needs in the event service demand changes over the next 50-75 years so they do not outgrow the facility too quickly. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. IX. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) - Received X.A. MINUTES: COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 14 AND DECEMBER 12, 2022 X.B. MINUTES: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 14, 2023 X. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. ADJOURNMENT Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:46 p.m. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 4, 2023. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the March 21, 2023, meeting available. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.17.23 TOTAL $1,025,408.74 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.24.23 TOTAL $513,019.19 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.17.23 TOTAL $1,025,408.74 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.24.23 TOTAL $513,019.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 38 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 230,954.062100 Police Special Revenue 1,398.652100 Police Special Revenue 1,069.002500 Conservation & Sustainability 228.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 3,253.202600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 30,720.722600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 10,637.504000 Capital Projects 130,734.714200 Equipment Replacement 1,798.165100 Art Center 6,044.615200 Braemar Golf Course 11,873.995200 Braemar Golf Course 189.255300 Aquatic Center 1,271.005400 Edinborough Park 9,632.165500 Braemar Arena 38,171.305600 Braemar Field 168.385700 Centennial Lakes 2,541.615800 Liquor 261,770.835900 Utility Fund 86,111.695900 Utility Fund 760.505900 Utility Fund 47,198.845900 Utility Fund 50,153.106100 Equipment Operations 12,016.056200 Information Technology 18,873.366300 Facilities Management 11,857.407100 PS Training Facility 22,638.767200 MN Task Force 1 33,341.419999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,025,408.74 TOTAL 1,025,408.74 1,025,408.74 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481893 03/17/2023 PRTD 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22302141 02/18/2023 20230317 380.55 CHECK 481893 TOTAL: 380.55 481894 03/17/2023 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DKT-TD77-3VMF 02/06/2023 20230317 57.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TJ6-XCK3-6K43 02/07/2023 20230317 334.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RFR-NLTT-LGMW 02/11/2023 20230317 1,224.83 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17MD-9493-3QND 02/14/2023 20230317 59.37 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1D1N-DY6K-3JQT 02/14/2023 20230317 18.09 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1W7F-MVFL-4HLK 02/14/2023 20230317 139.53 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1316-FGW4-799Y 02/15/2023 20230317 9.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RYQ-J1C1-796G 02/15/2023 20230317 72.74 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16R9-YDG9-97FP 02/15/2023 20230317 97.28 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16NR-Q11H-CDDM 02/15/2023 20230317 46.21 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PKC-F7X9-DWWW 02/16/2023 20230317 229.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KMQ-H3C6-G6L4 02/16/2023 20230317 41.87 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PWD-37JY-31Y4 02/16/2023 20230317 11.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JXL-NYNW-4MNP 02/17/2023 20230317 6.40 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GR1-X17N-FC71 02/18/2023 20230317 22.55 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JXL-NYNW-GDWW 02/19/2023 20230317 19.62 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VYT-VV6L-JDYX 02/19/2023 20230317 87.60 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TXY-G76D-K63P 02/19/2023 20230317 29.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VYT-VV6L-LHNC 02/20/2023 20230317 91.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1K46-K7KT-P63M 02/20/2023 20230317 29.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GR1-X17N-QKL7 02/20/2023 20230317 49.12 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CWT-DPL3-R4MX 02/20/2023 20230317 26.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1P6P-C1R1-R6WX 02/20/2023 20230317 26.98 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 481894 TOTAL: 2,735.16 481895 03/17/2023 PRTD 101874 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 112408 01/02/2023 20230317 1,326.00 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 112409 01/02/2023 20230317 1,326.00 CHECK 481895 TOTAL: 2,652.00 481896 03/17/2023 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500190097 02/15/2023 20230317 282.42 CHECK 481896 TOTAL: 282.42 481897 03/17/2023 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 308999 02/14/2023 20230317 22.50 ASPEN MILLS INC 309108 02/15/2023 20230317 367.00 CHECK 481897 TOTAL: 389.50 481898 03/17/2023 PRTD 100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 01P91934 02/14/2023 20230317 54.49 CHECK 481898 TOTAL: 54.49 481899 03/17/2023 PRTD 101718 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380138893 02/16/2023 20230317 174.96 CHECK 481899 TOTAL: 174.96 481900 03/17/2023 PRTD 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 258741 01/31/2023 20230317 12,444.00 CHECK 481900 TOTAL: 12,444.00 481901 03/17/2023 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23270354.23-1 02/16/2023 20230317 5,249.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.01-10 02/16/2023 20230317 12,724.10 CHECK 481901 TOTAL: 17,973.10 481902 03/17/2023 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0106456900 02/24/2023 20230317 29.13 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098514900 02/24/2023 20230317 99.38 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098515000 02/24/2023 20230317 415.33 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098602300 03/01/2023 20230317 1,026.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 481902 TOTAL: 1,570.79 481903 03/17/2023 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5138342 02/16/2023 20230317 1,044.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5139340 02/20/2023 20230317 783.00 CHECK 481903 TOTAL: 1,827.00 481904 03/17/2023 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 21564 03/02/2023 20230317 489.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 21563 03/02/2023 20230317 176.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 21562 03/02/2023 20230317 353.00 CHECK 481904 TOTAL: 1,018.00 481905 03/17/2023 PRTD 151149 BOARMAN KROOS VOGEL GROUP INC 61032-1 02/12/2023 20230317 99,839.00 CHECK 481905 TOTAL: 99,839.00 481906 03/17/2023 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84859525 02/14/2023 20230317 1,791.40 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84865469 02/20/2023 20230317 759.95 CHECK 481906 TOTAL: 2,551.35 481907 03/17/2023 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 194411 02/28/2023 20230317 1,260.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 194413 02/28/2023 20230317 885.90 BOURGET IMPORTS 194412 02/28/2023 20230317 1,586.00 CHECK 481907 TOTAL: 3,731.90 481908 03/17/2023 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 008P19739 02/17/2023 20230317 168.84 CHECK 481908 TOTAL: 168.84 481909 03/17/2023 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P49685 02/15/2023 20230317 60.75 CHECK 481909 TOTAL: 60.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481910 03/17/2023 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 347898891 02/22/2023 20230317 8,275.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016468 03/01/2023 20230317 2,950.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016467 03/01/2023 20230317 121.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016496 03/01/2023 20230317 1,426.35 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016497 03/02/2023 20230317 1,964.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016491 03/01/2023 20230317 65.22 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016492 03/01/2023 20230317 2,801.07 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016493 03/01/2023 20230317 1,894.95 CHECK 481910 TOTAL: 19,497.89 481911 03/17/2023 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347880192 02/21/2023 20230317 9,884.55 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347980492 02/28/2023 20230317 67.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347980482 02/28/2023 20230317 156.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347980483 02/28/2023 20230317 67.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347972270 02/28/2023 20230317 1,700.55 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 410682937 03/03/2023 20230317 -24.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347980491 02/28/2023 20230317 2,439.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347980490 02/28/2023 20230317 174.60 CHECK 481911 TOTAL: 14,465.85 481912 03/17/2023 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2800932 02/21/2023 20230317 7,463.65 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2805153 03/03/2023 20230317 60.30 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2805154 03/03/2023 20230317 61.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2804107 03/03/2023 20230317 -27.60 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2805155 03/03/2023 20230317 746.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2805156 03/03/2023 20230317 237.05 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2805157 03/03/2023 20230317 4,532.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2805151 03/03/2023 20230317 513.45 CHECK 481912 TOTAL: 13,587.00 481913 03/17/2023 PRTD 160520 CAREFREE AQUARIUM SERVICES LLC 27190 02/19/2023 20230317 157.00 CHECK 481913 TOTAL: 157.00 481914 03/17/2023 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 22196 02/14/2023 20230317 30,720.72 CHECK 481914 TOTAL: 30,720.72 481915 03/17/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4146995439 02/20/2023 20230317 89.76 CINTAS CORPORATION 4146994384 02/20/2023 20230317 14.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4146995401 02/20/2023 20230317 19.20 CINTAS CORPORATION 4146994268 02/20/2023 20230317 6.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4146994425 02/20/2023 20230317 35.04 CHECK 481915 TOTAL: 164.00 481916 03/17/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4146995522 02/20/2023 20230317 65.25 CHECK 481916 TOTAL: 65.25 481917 03/17/2023 PRTD 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 431-0005.300-01/23 02/06/2023 20230317 10,928.40 CHECK 481917 TOTAL: 10,928.40 481918 03/17/2023 PRTD 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 431-0005.300-02/23 03/06/2023 20230317 9,360.40 CHECK 481918 TOTAL: 9,360.40 481919 03/17/2023 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN ROCHESTER-02/2023-1 02/06/2023 20230317 9,788.81 CHECK 481919 TOTAL: 9,788.81 481920 03/17/2023 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN ROCHESTER-02/2023-2 02/22/2023 20230317 682.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 481920 TOTAL: 682.20 481921 03/17/2023 PRTD 100087 CITY OF SAINT PAUL IN52877 02/15/2023 20230317 12,578.56 CHECK 481921 TOTAL: 12,578.56 481922 03/17/2023 PRTD 140274 CIVICPLUS, LLC 250156 01/10/2023 20230317 19,133.45 CHECK 481922 TOTAL: 19,133.45 481923 03/17/2023 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 676097 03/01/2023 20230317 190.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 676098 03/01/2023 20230317 60.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 676101 03/01/2023 20230317 1,320.60 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 675980 03/01/2023 20230317 30.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 676102 03/01/2023 20230317 687.50 CHECK 481923 TOTAL: 2,288.10 481924 03/17/2023 PRTD 101403 CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING INC LC00081614 02/15/2023 20230317 459.15 CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING INC LC00081608 02/15/2023 20230317 459.15 CHECK 481924 TOTAL: 918.30 481925 03/17/2023 PRTD 130171 CTM SERVICES INC 6036 02/14/2023 20230317 63.55 CHECK 481925 TOTAL: 63.55 481926 03/17/2023 PRTD 103799 CURBSIDE LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION 268817 02/16/2023 20230317 100.98 CHECK 481926 TOTAL: 100.98 481927 03/17/2023 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4047256 02/16/2023 20230317 1,563.44 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4047258 02/16/2023 20230317 513.56 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4038786CM 02/17/2023 20230317 -26.59 CHECK 481927 TOTAL: 2,050.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481928 03/17/2023 PRTD 145811 EASTLAKE CRAFT BREWERY LLC 2215 03/01/2023 20230317 60.00 CHECK 481928 TOTAL: 60.00 481929 03/17/2023 PRTD 119000 EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC 2592 11/11/2022 20230317 5,000.00 CHECK 481929 TOTAL: 5,000.00 481930 03/17/2023 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2527492 02/17/2023 20230317 1,278.67 CHECK 481930 TOTAL: 1,278.67 481931 03/17/2023 PRTD 102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC 201108 02/15/2023 22200049 20230317 1,798.16 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC 201059 02/10/2023 22200049 20230317 7,500.00 CHECK 481931 TOTAL: 9,298.16 481932 03/17/2023 PRTD 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC P06448 01/12/2023 20230317 362.63 CHECK 481932 TOTAL: 362.63 481933 03/17/2023 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-478814 02/14/2023 20230317 10.56 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-478827 02/14/2023 20230317 147.68 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8384647 02/14/2023 20230317 103.93 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-478798 02/14/2023 20230317 139.50 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-478776 02/14/2023 20230317 185.35 CHECK 481933 TOTAL: 587.02 481934 03/17/2023 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-9267 02/24/2023 20230317 201.00 CHECK 481934 TOTAL: 201.00 481935 03/17/2023 PRTD 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC 168619 02/02/2023 20230317 9,999.99 CHECK 481935 TOTAL: 9,999.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481936 03/17/2023 PRTD 160412 MKM BRANDS INC 201 02/16/2023 20230317 1,485.00 CHECK 481936 TOTAL: 1,485.00 481937 03/17/2023 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1811681 02/06/2023 20230317 1,025.18 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1812156 02/06/2023 20230317 243.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1812790 02/07/2023 20230317 180.77 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1820851 02/16/2023 20230317 299.62 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1822594 02/17/2023 20230317 9.99 CHECK 481937 TOTAL: 1,758.56 481938 03/17/2023 PRTD 101931 HANESBRANDS INC 41984418 02/14/2023 20230317 1,452.16 HANESBRANDS INC 41984554 02/15/2023 20230317 966.00 CHECK 481938 TOTAL: 2,418.16 481939 03/17/2023 PRTD 143454 GLEASON ENTERPRISES LLC 90266 02/06/2023 20230317 1,701.72 CHECK 481939 TOTAL: 1,701.72 481940 03/17/2023 PRTD 160231 BOLDENOW, CINDY GG230208 02/08/2023 20230317 2,000.00 CHECK 481940 TOTAL: 2,000.00 481941 03/17/2023 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9609514402 02/15/2023 20230317 425.98 WW GRAINGER 9610778285 02/16/2023 20230317 24.27 WW GRAINGER 9611665275 02/16/2023 20230317 425.98 CHECK 481941 TOTAL: 876.23 481942 03/17/2023 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 237250 02/15/2023 20230317 13,968.11 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 237226 02/15/2023 20230317 3,797.05 CHECK 481942 TOTAL: 17,765.16 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481943 03/17/2023 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6406205 02/17/2023 20230317 3,745.00 CHECK 481943 TOTAL: 3,745.00 481944 03/17/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000199547 02/16/2023 20230317 1,602.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000198535 02/02/2023 20230317 2,429.10 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000200517 02/26/2023 20230317 67.00 CHECK 481944 TOTAL: 4,098.10 481945 03/17/2023 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 586212 02/28/2023 20230317 76.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 586211 02/28/2023 20230317 95.40 HOHENSTEINS INC 586204 02/28/2023 20230317 1,011.94 HOHENSTEINS INC 586205 02/28/2023 20230317 51.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 586177 02/28/2023 20230317 66.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 586185 02/28/2023 20230317 378.90 CHECK 481945 TOTAL: 1,679.74 481946 03/17/2023 PRTD 160628 HYDRA POWER HYDRAULICS 24977 02/13/2023 20230317 228.78 CHECK 481946 TOTAL: 228.78 481947 03/17/2023 PRTD 100031 I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 2023 I-494 CORRIDOR 01/31/2023 20230317 30,000.32 CHECK 481947 TOTAL: 30,000.32 481948 03/17/2023 PRTD 160639 IACP 2473 03/08/2023 20230317 500.00 IACP 2510 03/08/2023 20230317 500.00 CHECK 481948 TOTAL: 1,000.00 481949 03/17/2023 PRTD 160311 IKI INC 5582 02/16/2023 20230317 132.00 CHECK 481949 TOTAL: 132.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481950 03/17/2023 PRTD 129508 IMPACT MAILING OF MINNESOTA INC 204672 02/20/2023 20230317 3,724.72 CHECK 481950 TOTAL: 3,724.72 481951 03/17/2023 PRTD 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 1001640850 02/10/2023 20230317 1,197.00 CHECK 481951 TOTAL: 1,197.00 481952 03/17/2023 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 6732 02/24/2023 20230317 99.00 CHECK 481952 TOTAL: 99.00 481953 03/17/2023 PRTD 121404 ISTATE TRUCK INC C242812171:01 02/17/2023 20230317 64.76 CHECK 481953 TOTAL: 64.76 481954 03/17/2023 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3588843 02/24/2023 20230317 738.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3588845 02/24/2023 20230317 1,324.85 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3588844 02/24/2023 20230317 3,516.90 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3589900 03/02/2023 20230317 1,685.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3589899 03/02/2023 20230317 2,104.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 356681 02/25/2023 20230317 -321.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3589104 02/25/2023 20230317 200.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3589902 03/02/2023 20230317 161.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3589901 03/02/2023 20230317 1,504.28 CHECK 481954 TOTAL: 10,914.73 481955 03/17/2023 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549756 02/24/2023 20230317 126.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549757 02/24/2023 20230317 617.89 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549758 02/24/2023 20230317 2,196.10 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549768 02/24/2023 20230317 86.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549766 02/24/2023 20230317 1,507.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549767 02/24/2023 20230317 1,574.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549760 02/24/2023 20230317 200.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6549759 02/24/2023 20230317 1,945.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 690357 02/02/2023 20230317 -56.33 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553099 03/02/2023 20230317 83.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553100 03/02/2023 20230317 3,478.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553097 03/02/2023 20230317 261.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553096 03/02/2023 20230317 2,552.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553093 03/02/2023 20230317 81.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553095 03/02/2023 20230317 651.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553094 03/02/2023 20230317 2,375.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553105 03/02/2023 20230317 1,017.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553106 03/02/2023 20230317 83.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553107 03/02/2023 20230317 150.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553104 03/02/2023 20230317 3,594.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553108 03/02/2023 20230317 2,534.00 CHECK 481955 TOTAL: 25,063.91 481956 03/17/2023 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7417172 02/24/2023 20230317 73.35 WINE MERCHANTS 7417171 02/24/2023 20230317 3,931.06 WINE MERCHANTS 7416289 02/16/2023 20230317 5,662.49 WINE MERCHANTS 7417953 03/02/2023 20230317 2,714.80 WINE MERCHANTS 7417173 02/24/2023 20230317 2,640.30 WINE MERCHANTS 7417955 03/02/2023 20230317 11,963.80 CHECK 481956 TOTAL: 26,985.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481957 03/17/2023 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245376 02/24/2023 20230317 33.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245370 02/24/2023 20230317 133.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245375 02/24/2023 20230317 350.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245373 02/24/2023 20230317 162.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245371 02/24/2023 20230317 560.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245369 02/24/2023 20230317 526.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245368 02/24/2023 20230317 493.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245377 02/24/2023 20230317 516.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245374 02/24/2023 20230317 130.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245367 02/24/2023 20230317 1,359.13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245389 02/24/2023 20230317 31.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245394 02/24/2023 20230317 33.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245393 02/24/2023 20230317 656.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245396 02/24/2023 20230317 1,124.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245372 02/24/2023 20230317 280.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245390 02/24/2023 20230317 393.98 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245391 02/24/2023 20230317 889.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245392 02/24/2023 20230317 1,800.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245395 02/24/2023 20230317 1,404.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245385 02/24/2023 20230317 2,319.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245378 02/24/2023 20230317 5,914.18 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245383 02/24/2023 20230317 656.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245381 02/24/2023 20230317 2,134.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245384 02/24/2023 20230317 662.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245382 02/24/2023 20230317 996.02 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245380 02/24/2023 20230317 730.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2245379 02/24/2023 20230317 2,372.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249807 03/02/2023 20230317 1,124.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249811 03/02/2023 20230317 301.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249808 03/02/2023 20230317 749.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249810 03/02/2023 20230317 1,195.44 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249806 03/02/2023 20230317 3,477.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249813 03/02/2023 20230317 33.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249798 03/02/2023 20230317 343.01 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249800 03/02/2023 20230317 1,807.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249801 03/02/2023 20230317 241.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249803 03/02/2023 20230317 2,586.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 242202 02/21/2023 20230317 -166.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249799 03/02/2023 20230317 468.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249802 03/02/2023 20230317 338.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249804 03/02/2023 20230317 1,065.59 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249805 03/02/2023 20230317 332.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249797 03/02/2023 20230317 38.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249823 03/02/2023 20230317 366.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249819 03/02/2023 20230317 6,713.63 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249821 03/02/2023 20230317 112.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249818 03/02/2023 20230317 976.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249817 03/02/2023 20230317 2,646.89 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249824 03/02/2023 20230317 2,655.67 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249816 03/02/2023 20230317 31.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2250085 03/02/2023 20230317 4.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2250067 03/02/2023 20230317 336.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2250068 03/02/2023 20230317 3,873.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249822 03/02/2023 20230317 1,132.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249820 03/02/2023 20230317 1,828.31 CHECK 481957 TOTAL: 61,279.15 481958 03/17/2023 PRTD 100835 ORIGIN WINE AND SPIRITS 0020733 02/24/2023 20230317 146.70 ORIGIN WINE AND SPIRITS 0020807 03/02/2023 20230317 81.40 CHECK 481958 TOTAL: 228.10 481959 03/17/2023 PRTD 145396 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 005262 03/01/2023 20230317 195.00 CHECK 481959 TOTAL: 195.00 481960 03/17/2023 PRTD 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO 16209063 12/21/2022 20230317 252.00 KIDCREATE STUDIO 16273622 12/30/2022 20230317 836.00 KIDCREATE STUDIO 15985029 11/30/2022 20230317 252.00 KIDCREATE STUDIO 15602908 10/17/2022 20230317 126.00 CHECK 481960 TOTAL: 1,466.00 481961 03/17/2023 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 160603028-0123 01/31/2023 20230317 10,637.50 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 23967227-1 01/31/2023 20230317 3,710.00 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 23967227-2 01/31/2023 20230317 170.66 CHECK 481961 TOTAL: 14,518.16 481962 03/17/2023 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 6174 03/01/2023 20230317 80.00 CHECK 481962 TOTAL: 80.00 481963 03/17/2023 PRTD 151166 LAMIS, JAMES 30230101-FINAL 02/10/2023 20230317 2,280.00 LAMIS, JAMES 232004 02/24/2023 20230317 228.50 LAMIS, JAMES 32031235 03/11/2023 20230317 2,896.83 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 481963 TOTAL: 5,405.33 481964 03/17/2023 PRTD 100605 LANDS' END INC SIN11008428 02/14/2023 20230317 29.00 CHECK 481964 TOTAL: 29.00 481965 03/17/2023 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310349892 02/14/2023 20230317 200.72 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310357952 02/16/2023 20230317 201.52 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310364136 02/19/2023 20230317 2,026.37 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310365827 02/20/2023 20230317 17.23 CHECK 481965 TOTAL: 2,445.84 481966 03/17/2023 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 377400 02/17/2023 20230317 20.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 377399 02/17/2023 20230317 40.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 377408 02/17/2023 20230317 20.00 CHECK 481966 TOTAL: 80.00 481967 03/17/2023 PRTD 128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY 22028 02/17/2023 20230317 25,420.00 CHECK 481967 TOTAL: 25,420.00 481968 03/17/2023 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 55532 02/28/2023 20230317 544.16 LIBATION PROJECT 55533 02/28/2023 20230317 434.04 LIBATION PROJECT 55535 02/28/2023 20230317 686.02 CHECK 481968 TOTAL: 1,664.22 481969 03/17/2023 PRTD 100858 LOGIS 53283-2 12/31/2022 20230317 35,578.51 LOGIS 53339 01/01/2023 20230317 6,830.00 LOGIS 53367 01/01/2023 20230317 3,000.00 CHECK 481969 TOTAL: 45,408.51 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481970 03/17/2023 PRTD 139627 TOM LOUCKS & ASSOCIATES INC 43828 02/16/2023 20230317 3,253.20 CHECK 481970 TOTAL: 3,253.20 481971 03/17/2023 PRTD 160548 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-1242 03/01/2023 20230317 338.00 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-1240 03/01/2023 20230317 246.00 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-1241 03/01/2023 20230317 318.00 CHECK 481971 TOTAL: 902.00 481972 03/17/2023 PRTD 135835 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 5142XLP6S3-2023039 02/08/2023 20230317 1,242.00 CHECK 481972 TOTAL: 1,242.00 481973 03/17/2023 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51420 02/24/2023 20230317 120.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51419 02/24/2023 20230317 378.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51551 03/01/2023 20230317 373.70 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51552 03/02/2023 20230317 295.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51549 03/01/2023 20230317 157.00 CHECK 481973 TOTAL: 1,323.70 481974 03/17/2023 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 107180 02/14/2023 20230317 350.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 107283 02/15/2023 20230317 440.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 107285 02/15/2023 20230317 440.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 107193 02/14/2023 20230317 1,274.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 107439 02/16/2023 20230317 1,750.98 LVC COMPANIES INC 107671 02/20/2023 20230317 1,927.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 107676 02/20/2023 20230317 740.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 107694 02/20/2023 20230317 755.20 LVC COMPANIES INC 107715 02/20/2023 20230317 374.51 LVC COMPANIES INC 107716 02/20/2023 20230317 1,187.26 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 481974 TOTAL: 9,238.95 481975 03/17/2023 PRTD 160378 MARIAN, JEFFREY 02-02-2023 02/02/2023 20230317 810.00 CHECK 481975 TOTAL: 810.00 481976 03/17/2023 PRTD 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 15111 01/31/2023 20230317 1,250.00 CHECK 481976 TOTAL: 1,250.00 481977 03/17/2023 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV939497 03/01/2023 20230317 289.50 CHECK 481977 TOTAL: 289.50 481978 03/17/2023 PRTD 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 03-24-2023 02/27/2023 20230317 616.00 CHECK 481978 TOTAL: 616.00 481979 03/17/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 57502 02/14/2023 20230317 61.96 CHECK 481979 TOTAL: 61.96 481980 03/17/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 76677 02/14/2023 20230317 13.96 MENARDS 76770 02/15/2023 20230317 254.89 MENARDS 76795 02/16/2023 20230317 264.39 MENARDS 76853 02/17/2023 20230317 44.99 CHECK 481980 TOTAL: 578.23 481981 03/17/2023 PRTD 100885 METRO SALES INC INV2224374 02/14/2023 20230317 1,507.90 CHECK 481981 TOTAL: 1,507.90 481982 03/17/2023 PRTD 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS ASSOCI 1760 02/15/2023 20230317 656.00 CHECK 481982 TOTAL: 656.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481983 03/17/2023 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 420443 02/15/2023 20230317 1,210.66 CHECK 481983 TOTAL: 1,210.66 481984 03/17/2023 PRTD 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN 5666 02/06/2023 20230317 60.00 CHECK 481984 TOTAL: 60.00 481985 03/17/2023 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 34236 02/17/2023 20230317 428.72 CHECK 481985 TOTAL: 428.72 481986 03/17/2023 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-39115 02/28/2023 20230317 94.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-39116 02/28/2023 20230317 304.00 CHECK 481986 TOTAL: 398.00 481987 03/17/2023 PRTD 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT INC 148642 02/20/2023 20230317 1,320.00 CHECK 481987 TOTAL: 1,320.00 481988 03/17/2023 PRTD 160072 NAC MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SERVI A3598-02 02/15/2023 20230317 6,600.00 CHECK 481988 TOTAL: 6,600.00 481989 03/17/2023 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 201129 03/01/2023 20230317 1,073.50 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 201130 03/01/2023 20230317 747.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 201127 03/01/2023 20230317 732.50 CHECK 481989 TOTAL: 2,553.00 481990 03/17/2023 PRTD 160385 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 291344391001 02/14/2023 20230317 60.99 CHECK 481990 TOTAL: 60.99 481991 03/17/2023 PRTD 999998 KNUTSON, STEVE 273-22-3430 02/21/2023 20230317 1,272.85 CHECK 481991 TOTAL: 1,272.85 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 481992 03/17/2023 PRTD 999998 LERBAKKEN, TERESA 273-22-2320 02/21/2023 20230317 1,899.20 CHECK 481992 TOTAL: 1,899.20 481993 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Bellin Construction ED182594-REFUND 03/14/2023 20230317 9,340.00 CHECK 481993 TOTAL: 9,340.00 481994 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Bollig And Sons ED198607-REFUND 03/13/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 481994 TOTAL: 2,500.00 481995 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Neutgens Excavating ED200968-REFUND 03/13/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 481995 TOTAL: 2,500.00 481996 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Neutgens Excavating ED187391-REFUND 03/13/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 481996 TOTAL: 2,500.00 481997 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Nord Excavating Inc ED191244-REFUND 03/14/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 481997 TOTAL: 2,500.00 481998 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Nord Excavating Inc ED191211-REFUND 03/15/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 481998 TOTAL: 2,500.00 481999 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Scherber Companies LLC ED182608-REFUND 03/02/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 481999 TOTAL: 2,500.00 482000 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Streeter Custom Builder ED182619-REFUND 03/03/2023 20230317 9,450.00 CHECK 482000 TOTAL: 9,450.00 482001 03/17/2023 PRTD 999995 Superior Contracting Inc ED199470-REFUND 03/03/2023 20230317 2,500.00 CHECK 482001 TOTAL: 2,500.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482002 03/17/2023 PRTD 999994 American Waterworks ED203495-REFUND 03/10/2023 20230317 118.00 CHECK 482002 TOTAL: 118.00 482003 03/17/2023 PRTD 999994 BREDAHL PLUMBING ED203031-REFUND 03/01/2023 20230317 57.32 CHECK 482003 TOTAL: 57.32 482004 03/17/2023 PRTD 999996 Gilbert, Nicholas 50242438-REFUND 03/01/2023 20230317 50.00 CHECK 482004 TOTAL: 50.00 482005 03/17/2023 PRTD 999996 Lindell, Mary 49950359-REFUND 02/21/2023 20230317 124.00 CHECK 482005 TOTAL: 124.00 482006 03/17/2023 PRTD 999996 Russ, Loretta 50283653-REFUND 03/02/2023 20230317 9.00 CHECK 482006 TOTAL: 9.00 482007 03/17/2023 PRTD 999996 Shearer, Wendy 50283773-REFUND 03/02/2023 20230317 9.00 CHECK 482007 TOTAL: 9.00 482008 03/17/2023 PRTD 999997 Busse, Emil 00128236-3/13/23 03/13/2023 20230317 500.00 CHECK 482008 TOTAL: 500.00 482009 03/17/2023 PRTD 999997 Pelinka, Tom 00105801-3/14/23 03/14/2023 20230317 104.87 CHECK 482009 TOTAL: 104.87 482010 03/17/2023 PRTD 145078 PROACTIVE SPORTS INC 1485778-00 02/16/2023 20230317 832.00 CHECK 482010 TOTAL: 832.00 482011 03/17/2023 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 194667 02/28/2023 20230317 1,478.50 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 194654 02/28/2023 20230317 51.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 194669 02/28/2023 20230317 1,118.70 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 194676 02/28/2023 20230317 624.50 CHECK 482011 TOTAL: 3,272.70 482012 03/17/2023 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 50615858 02/24/2023 20230317 1,271.50 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 52009014 02/27/2023 20230317 802.37 CHECK 482012 TOTAL: 2,073.87 482013 03/17/2023 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-180022 03/02/2023 20230317 209.20 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-180023 03/02/2023 20230317 142.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-180025 03/02/2023 20230317 309.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-180021 03/02/2023 20230317 153.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-180024 03/01/2023 20230317 209.20 CHECK 482013 TOTAL: 1,022.90 482014 03/17/2023 PRTD 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 205725 02/10/2023 20230317 363.50 CHECK 482014 TOTAL: 363.50 482015 03/17/2023 PRTD 160501 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 13606472 01/31/2023 20230317 3,329.71 CHECK 482015 TOTAL: 3,329.71 482016 03/17/2023 PRTD 136099 POLCO 17449 02/15/2023 22300007 20230317 43,100.00 CHECK 482016 TOTAL: 43,100.00 482017 03/17/2023 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210640755 02/17/2023 20230317 1,180.00 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210640843 02/17/2023 20230317 226.51 CHECK 482017 TOTAL: 1,406.51 482018 03/17/2023 PRTD 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 78153 02/08/2023 20230317 864.00 CHECK 482018 TOTAL: 864.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482019 03/17/2023 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 160398 02/17/2023 20230317 759.20 SCHENCK, DAVID 160418 02/17/2023 20230317 1,683.80 SCHENCK, DAVID 160397 02/17/2023 20230317 425.68 SCHENCK, DAVID 160414 02/17/2023 20230317 797.51 SCHENCK, DAVID 160416 02/20/2023 20230317 1,038.23 CHECK 482019 TOTAL: 4,704.42 482020 03/17/2023 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-50957 02/24/2023 20230317 410.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-51232 03/02/2023 20230317 831.00 CHECK 482020 TOTAL: 1,241.00 482021 03/17/2023 PRTD 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE 529603 01/31/2023 20230317 302.00 CHECK 482021 TOTAL: 302.00 482022 03/17/2023 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0078216-IN 02/14/2023 20230317 443.95 CHECK 482022 TOTAL: 443.95 482023 03/17/2023 PRTD 160517 RANGE RENOVATION CONSULTING INC 1057 09/13/2022 20230317 1,000.00 RANGE RENOVATION CONSULTING INC 2041 12/31/2022 20230317 21,520.00 CHECK 482023 TOTAL: 22,520.00 482024 03/17/2023 PRTD 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 0894-006105312 01/31/2023 20230317 50,153.10 CHECK 482024 TOTAL: 50,153.10 482025 03/17/2023 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 86713 02/17/2023 20230317 3,299.40 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 86714 02/17/2023 20230317 603.50 CHECK 482025 TOTAL: 3,902.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482026 03/17/2023 PRTD 100980 ROBERT B HILL COMPANY 409594 02/15/2023 20230317 275.00 CHECK 482026 TOTAL: 275.00 482027 03/17/2023 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 238150024 02/14/2023 20230317 63.00 ORKIN 238149712 02/17/2023 20230317 149.47 CHECK 482027 TOTAL: 212.47 482028 03/17/2023 PRTD 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 0000058899 02/14/2023 20230317 583.20 CHECK 482028 TOTAL: 583.20 482029 03/17/2023 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 759365 02/14/2023 20230317 72.45 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 759312 02/14/2023 20230317 611.60 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 759759 02/16/2023 20230317 109.78 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 760018 02/17/2023 20230317 109.78 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 759967 02/17/2023 20230317 101.86 CHECK 482029 TOTAL: 1,005.47 482030 03/17/2023 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 91173154 02/14/2023 20230317 1,317.59 CHECK 482030 TOTAL: 1,317.59 482031 03/17/2023 PRTD 150753 SAFEWARE INC 30057405 02/14/2023 20230317 291.85 CHECK 482031 TOTAL: 291.85 482032 03/17/2023 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 103582 02/15/2023 20230317 70.00 CHECK 482032 TOTAL: 70.00 482033 03/17/2023 PRTD 160574 JEAN, SANDRA 03-2023 02/17/2023 20230317 2,360.00 CHECK 482033 TOTAL: 2,360.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482034 03/17/2023 PRTD 144403 SENTEXT SOLUTIONS 311031 02/20/2023 20230317 318.50 CHECK 482034 TOTAL: 318.50 482035 03/17/2023 PRTD 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC 64556 02/10/2023 20230317 1,049.00 CHECK 482035 TOTAL: 1,049.00 482036 03/17/2023 PRTD 144705 DILEMMA BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2581 03/02/2023 20230317 204.00 CHECK 482036 TOTAL: 204.00 482037 03/17/2023 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2864955 02/24/2023 20230317 370.91 KELBRO COMPANY 2865012 02/24/2023 20230317 77.40 KELBRO COMPANY 2866556 03/02/2023 20230317 109.00 CHECK 482037 TOTAL: 557.31 482038 03/17/2023 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 594241 02/17/2023 20230317 17.73 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 594242 02/17/2023 20230317 17.73 CHECK 482038 TOTAL: 35.46 482039 03/17/2023 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN62549 03/01/2023 20230317 235.76 SMALL LOT MN MN62522 02/28/2023 20230317 169.04 SMALL LOT MN MN62550 03/01/2023 20230317 316.08 SMALL LOT MN MN62520 02/28/2023 20230317 169.04 CHECK 482039 TOTAL: 889.92 482040 03/17/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2316387 02/22/2023 20230317 6,130.13 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2316399 02/22/2023 20230317 6,324.46 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318580 03/01/2023 20230317 527.30 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318582 03/01/2023 20230317 1,571.91 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318583 03/01/2023 20230317 1,107.28 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318590 03/01/2023 20230317 3,072.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318592 03/01/2023 20230317 425.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318587 03/01/2023 20230317 1,623.70 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318591 03/01/2023 20230317 715.51 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318586 03/01/2023 20230317 333.70 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318589 03/02/2023 20230317 865.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318585 02/28/2023 20230317 176.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318581 02/28/2023 20230317 186.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318584 03/01/2023 20230317 1,327.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318593 02/28/2023 20230317 430.50 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318597 03/01/2023 20230317 2,601.18 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318594 02/28/2023 20230317 231.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318598 02/28/2023 20230317 208.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318596 02/28/2023 20230317 2,587.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318595 02/28/2023 20230317 685.52 CHECK 482040 TOTAL: 31,132.59 482041 03/17/2023 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 49925 02/15/2023 20230317 12,944.17 CHECK 482041 TOTAL: 12,944.17 482042 03/17/2023 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 2 LLC 49926 02/15/2023 20230317 2,845.45 CHECK 482042 TOTAL: 2,845.45 482043 03/17/2023 PRTD 100438 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC 2040967 02/09/2023 20230317 29,986.24 CHECK 482043 TOTAL: 29,986.24 482044 03/17/2023 PRTD 139006 MN DNR ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOU 1973-1119-2022 02/14/2023 20230317 37,337.30 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482044 TOTAL: 37,337.30 482045 03/17/2023 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE-NOTA 2023-CONWELL 03/09/2023 20230317 120.00 CHECK 482045 TOTAL: 120.00 482046 03/17/2023 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 49200 03/01/2023 20230317 204.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 49199 02/27/2023 20230317 175.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 49207 02/27/2023 20230317 105.00 CHECK 482046 TOTAL: 484.00 482047 03/17/2023 PRTD 141830 LUCAS, STEVEN 46079 02/08/2023 20230317 150.00 CHECK 482047 TOTAL: 150.00 482048 03/17/2023 PRTD 160636 STOCK, DANIEL 12-19-2022 12/19/2022 20230317 500.00 CHECK 482048 TOTAL: 500.00 482049 03/17/2023 PRTD 102786 STOP STICK LTD 0027916-IN 02/14/2023 20230317 1,069.00 CHECK 482049 TOTAL: 1,069.00 482050 03/17/2023 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1617512 02/15/2023 20230317 269.99 STREICHERS INC I1617607 02/16/2023 20230317 104.98 CHECK 482050 TOTAL: 374.97 482051 03/17/2023 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447509747 02/25/2023 20230317 560.84 CHECK 482051 TOTAL: 560.84 482052 03/17/2023 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 36355794 01/05/2023 20230317 -491.96 TAYLOR MADE 36487679 02/24/2023 20230317 -2,012.92 TAYLOR MADE 36494491 02/27/2023 20230317 3,611.67 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482052 TOTAL: 1,106.79 482053 03/17/2023 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M27982 02/13/2023 20230317 196.75 CHECK 482053 TOTAL: 196.75 482054 03/17/2023 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S5681 02/16/2023 20230317 1,714.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S5682 02/16/2023 20230317 703.25 CHECK 482054 TOTAL: 2,417.25 482055 03/17/2023 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2174125 02/17/2023 20230317 525.00 CHECK 482055 TOTAL: 525.00 482056 03/17/2023 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2400 03/02/2023 20230317 112.00 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2399 03/02/2023 20230317 106.00 CHECK 482056 TOTAL: 218.00 482057 03/17/2023 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 49924 02/15/2023 20230317 2,057.71 CHECK 482057 TOTAL: 2,057.71 482058 03/17/2023 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 3884 02/24/2023 20230317 171.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 3885 02/24/2023 20230317 322.50 CHECK 482058 TOTAL: 493.50 482059 03/17/2023 PRTD 141927 VER-TECH LABORATORIES INC INV000034572 02/20/2023 20230317 8,897.94 CHECK 482059 TOTAL: 8,897.94 482060 03/17/2023 PRTD 160088 VINIFERA IMPORTS 326280 02/24/2023 20230317 198.00 CHECK 482060 TOTAL: 198.00 482061 03/17/2023 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0324890-IN 03/02/2023 20230317 2,412.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0324889-IN 03/02/2023 20230317 127.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET VINOCOPIA INC 0324888-IN 03/02/2023 20230317 306.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0324893-IN 03/02/2023 20230317 779.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0324892-IN 03/02/2023 20230317 121.25 CHECK 482061 TOTAL: 3,747.25 482062 03/17/2023 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 67379161 02/17/2023 20230317 1,927.23 CHECK 482062 TOTAL: 1,927.23 482063 03/17/2023 PRTD 130574 WATSON COMPANY 132108 02/16/2023 20230317 471.28 WATSON COMPANY 132203 02/20/2023 20230317 291.78 CHECK 482063 TOTAL: 763.06 482064 03/17/2023 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 228473 02/22/2023 20230317 5,649.45 WINE COMPANY 229036 03/01/2023 20230317 194.00 WINE COMPANY 229037 03/01/2023 20230317 1,852.00 WINE COMPANY 229038 03/01/2023 20230317 1,098.00 WINE COMPANY 229035 03/01/2023 20230317 1,528.00 CHECK 482064 TOTAL: 10,321.45 482065 03/17/2023 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00127085 02/28/2023 20230317 442.20 WINEBOW MN00127086 02/28/2023 20230317 1,081.92 CHECK 482065 TOTAL: 1,524.12 482066 03/17/2023 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4080 03/02/2023 20230317 358.80 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4082 03/02/2023 20230317 76.90 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4081 03/02/2023 20230317 170.40 CHECK 482066 TOTAL: 606.10 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482067 03/17/2023 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000336 03/02/2023 20230317 252.00 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000335 03/02/2023 20230317 58.50 CHECK 482067 TOTAL: 310.50 482068 03/17/2023 PRTD 103410 WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC 109821 02/13/2023 20230317 13,966.00 WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC 109823 02/13/2023 20230317 6,445.00 CHECK 482068 TOTAL: 20,411.00 482069 03/17/2023 PRTD 160573 YELLOW DOG SOFTWARE LLC INV-022319 03/01/2023 20230317 5,904.00 CHECK 482069 TOTAL: 5,904.00 482070 03/17/2023 PRTD 160077 YETI HOLDINGS, INC 999071882 02/16/2023 20230317 162.50 CHECK 482070 TOTAL: 162.50 482071 03/17/2023 PRTD 103266 YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC MAR 2023 03/01/2023 20230317 1,148.77 CHECK 482071 TOTAL: 1,148.77 482072 03/17/2023 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 23740 02/14/2023 20230317 1,058.95 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 23745 02/16/2023 20230317 389.70 CHECK 482072 TOTAL: 1,448.65 482073 03/17/2023 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN000879451 02/14/2023 20230317 1,520.00 CHECK 482073 TOTAL: 1,520.00 482074 03/17/2023 PRTD 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 3669460 02/19/2023 20230317 2,151.08 CHECK 482074 TOTAL: 2,151.08 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/16/2023 09:47User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 NUMBER OF CHECKS 182 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,025,408.74 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 182 1,025,408.74 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,025,408.74 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 72,506.642300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 3,598.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 57.094000 Capital Projects 62,888.304600 MSA tracking 2,969.555100 Art Center 320.835200 Braemar Golf Course 9,351.855300 Aquatic Center 4,893.005400 Edinborough Park 8,618.145500 Braemar Arena 13,943.235600 Braemar Field 79.205700 Centennial Lakes 2,717.675800 Liquor 223,863.085900 Utility Fund 26,657.925900 Utility Fund 19,605.385900 Utility Fund 7,500.256000 Risk Management 17.136100 Equipment Operations 41,170.956200 Information Technology 10,487.036300 Facilities Management 1,224.277100 PS Training Facility 399.987200 MN Task Force 1 149.709999 Pooled Cash Fund 513,019.19 TOTAL 513,019.19 513,019.19 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482075 03/24/2023 PRTD 100612 A M LEONARD INC CI23006107 02/22/2023 20230324 46.23 CHECK 482075 TOTAL: 46.23 482076 03/24/2023 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0173398-IN 02/22/2023 20230324 69.51 CHECK 482076 TOTAL: 69.51 482077 03/24/2023 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 915044696 02/24/2023 20230324 427.22 ACUSHNET COMPANY 915085341 03/02/2023 20230324 205.84 CHECK 482077 TOTAL: 633.06 482078 03/24/2023 PRTD 160201 TB GLASS 8959 02/24/2023 20230324 435.00 CHECK 482078 TOTAL: 435.00 482079 03/24/2023 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 204174 02/22/2023 20230324 245.67 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 203706 02/03/2023 20230324 130.56 CHECK 482079 TOTAL: 376.23 482080 03/24/2023 PRTD 137833 PEREGRINE AWARDS AND PROMOTIONAL 13847 02/22/2023 20230324 169.00 PEREGRINE AWARDS AND PROMOTIONAL 13889 02/27/2023 20230324 48.00 CHECK 482080 TOTAL: 217.00 482081 03/24/2023 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 16426 03/08/2023 20230324 256.00 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 16431 03/08/2023 20230324 125.00 CHECK 482081 TOTAL: 381.00 482082 03/24/2023 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V6Q-GCFL-4D6D 02/23/2023 20230324 11.76 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LYK-1V3Q-4HCD 02/23/2023 20230324 80.35 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NWT-H733-4HRL 02/23/2023 20230324 176.83 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CJP-7CXM-61LR 02/23/2023 20230324 11.20 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L1X-JQVX-6P1G 02/23/2023 20230324 86.01 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QH4-XVH1-CVP6 02/24/2023 20230324 131.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V6Q-GCFL-G1CR 02/24/2023 20230324 189.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VJX-YNLP-H1QP 02/24/2023 20230324 39.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TPY-T3NW-H317 02/24/2023 20230324 58.50 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1R36-HG1H-HV1R 02/24/2023 20230324 29.54 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1R36-HG1H-JFFK 02/24/2023 20230324 10.12 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QH7-WFQ7-LMNL 02/25/2023 20230324 109.90 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VJW-FXGM-QQVM 02/26/2023 20230324 28.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VT6-6TY7-PVGD 02/26/2023 20230324 12.51 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V6Q-GCFL-PY6H 02/26/2023 20230324 136.44 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17YF-KX3C-PNRQ 02/26/2023 20230324 11.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VJW-FXGM-PVFM 02/26/2023 20230324 54.21 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L1X-JQVX-PQL4 02/26/2023 20230324 -9.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GVL-DCC3-P44G 02/26/2023 20230324 19.97 CHECK 482082 TOTAL: 1,190.17 482083 03/24/2023 PRTD 118491 APPLE INC AL09551641 02/24/2023 20230324 1,244.00 CHECK 482083 TOTAL: 1,244.00 482084 03/24/2023 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500194422 02/22/2023 20230324 203.37 CHECK 482084 TOTAL: 203.37 482085 03/24/2023 PRTD 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO 10246328 02/22/2023 20230324 245.50 CHECK 482085 TOTAL: 245.50 482086 03/24/2023 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 309369 02/21/2023 20230324 149.70 ASPEN MILLS INC 309384 02/21/2023 20230324 965.85 ASPEN MILLS INC 309490 02/24/2023 20230324 115.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ASPEN MILLS INC 309492 02/24/2023 20230324 472.28 CHECK 482086 TOTAL: 1,703.08 482087 03/24/2023 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1422086-030123 03/01/2023 20230324 7,665.91 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1406543-030123 03/01/2023 20230324 13,065.19 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1405453-030123 03/01/2023 20230324 3,084.01 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1146354-030123 03/01/2023 20230324 343.76 CHECK 482087 TOTAL: 24,158.87 482088 03/24/2023 PRTD 100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02S33879 02/24/2023 20230324 8,459.93 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P24698 02/27/2023 20230324 4,310.34 CHECK 482088 TOTAL: 12,770.27 482089 03/24/2023 PRTD 101718 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380139620 02/21/2023 20230324 49.80 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 380139801 02/24/2023 20230324 57.24 CHECK 482089 TOTAL: 107.04 482090 03/24/2023 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271892.00-10 02/28/2023 20230324 498.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271898.01-7 02/27/2023 20230324 11,268.03 CHECK 482090 TOTAL: 11,766.03 482091 03/24/2023 PRTD 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC 608072 02/21/2023 20230324 1,390.00 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC 608073 02/21/2023 20230324 180.00 CHECK 482091 TOTAL: 1,570.00 482092 03/24/2023 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0106516400 03/09/2023 20230324 27.12 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098671000 03/09/2023 20230324 233.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0106511700 03/09/2023 20230324 50.93 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098662000 03/09/2023 20230324 724.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098660500 03/09/2023 20230324 999.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0098670900 03/09/2023 20230324 3,924.23 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0106512300 03/09/2023 20230324 105.38 CHECK 482092 TOTAL: 6,064.01 482093 03/24/2023 PRTD 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 942207 02/21/2023 20230324 73.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 942424 02/22/2023 20230324 1,178.95 CHECK 482093 TOTAL: 1,251.95 482094 03/24/2023 PRTD 143097 BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC 426910 02/25/2023 20230324 11,685.00 CHECK 482094 TOTAL: 11,685.00 482095 03/24/2023 PRTD 130069 BFG SUPPLY COMPANY 2238025-00 02/23/2023 20230324 959.87 BFG SUPPLY COMPANY 2238024-00 02/24/2023 20230324 421.09 CHECK 482095 TOTAL: 1,380.96 482096 03/24/2023 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 21656 03/09/2023 20230324 257.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 21655 03/09/2023 20230324 409.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 21657 03/09/2023 20230324 495.00 CHECK 482096 TOTAL: 1,161.00 482097 03/24/2023 PRTD 151149 BOARMAN KROOS VOGEL GROUP INC 61032-2 02/12/2023 20230324 260.10 CHECK 482097 TOTAL: 260.10 482098 03/24/2023 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0307103 02/20/2023 20230324 3,598.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0307109 02/20/2023 20230324 1,209.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0307601 02/27/2023 20230324 4,900.35 CHECK 482098 TOTAL: 9,707.35 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482099 03/24/2023 PRTD 101010 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 925860247 02/27/2023 20230324 57.09 CHECK 482099 TOTAL: 57.09 482100 03/24/2023 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84868633 02/22/2023 20230324 134.97 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84868634 02/22/2023 20230324 879.92 CHECK 482100 TOTAL: 1,014.89 482101 03/24/2023 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 194601 03/07/2023 20230324 1,566.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 194602 03/07/2023 20230324 231.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 194599 03/07/2023 20230324 310.00 CHECK 482101 TOTAL: 2,107.00 482102 03/24/2023 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P48370 02/21/2023 20230324 1,443.96 CHECK 482102 TOTAL: 1,443.96 482103 03/24/2023 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B331720 02/22/2023 20230324 3,126.00 CHECK 482103 TOTAL: 3,126.00 482104 03/24/2023 PRTD 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 3130 03/15/2023 20230324 772.86 CHECK 482104 TOTAL: 772.86 482105 03/24/2023 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348016469 03/01/2023 20230324 7,215.54 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348060473 03/03/2023 20230324 317.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110966 03/08/2023 20230324 121.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110968 03/08/2023 20230324 124.76 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110969 03/08/2023 20230324 496.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110967 03/08/2023 20230324 2,637.77 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110961 03/08/2023 20230324 4,261.54 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110962 03/08/2023 20230324 2,305.10 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110963 03/08/2023 20230324 210.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110964 03/08/2023 20230324 92.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110965 03/08/2023 20230324 2,490.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110943 03/08/2023 20230324 4,837.57 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110944 03/08/2023 20230324 2,799.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110946 03/08/2023 20230324 175.71 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110945 03/08/2023 20230324 89.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 348110947 03/08/2023 20230324 92.62 CHECK 482105 TOTAL: 28,266.96 482106 03/24/2023 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 347972113 02/28/2023 20230324 6,426.85 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 348089620 03/07/2023 20230324 2,460.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 348089418 03/07/2023 20230324 289.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 410694432 03/06/2023 20230324 -14.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 410694434 03/06/2023 20230324 -28.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 410694433 03/06/2023 20230324 -20.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 410694435 03/06/2023 20230324 -25.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 410694436 03/06/2023 20230324 -20.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 348089419 03/07/2023 20230324 1,046.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 348084216 03/07/2023 20230324 7,369.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 348107271 03/07/2023 20230324 135.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 348090936 03/07/2023 20230324 7,519.85 CHECK 482106 TOTAL: 25,137.90 482107 03/24/2023 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1231354-1 02/27/2023 20230324 25.08 CHECK 482107 TOTAL: 25.08 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482108 03/24/2023 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2806197 03/10/2023 20230324 1,005.70 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2808108 03/10/2023 20230324 60.30 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2808110 03/10/2023 20230324 41.55 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2806198 03/10/2023 20230324 1,400.70 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2806195 03/07/2023 20230324 242.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2806194 03/07/2023 20230324 27.49 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2806196 03/07/2023 20230324 5,988.05 CHECK 482108 TOTAL: 8,765.79 482109 03/24/2023 PRTD 160207 JASON THOMAS CARDINAL EPD2023-1 02/15/2023 20230324 2,220.00 CHECK 482109 TOTAL: 2,220.00 482110 03/24/2023 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV149022 02/27/2023 20230324 95.00 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV149023 02/27/2023 20230324 279.00 CHECK 482110 TOTAL: 374.00 482111 03/24/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4147700611 02/27/2023 20230324 27.37 CINTAS CORPORATION 4147700560 02/27/2023 20230324 14.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4147700634 02/27/2023 20230324 6.00 CHECK 482111 TOTAL: 47.37 482112 03/24/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 5146578490 02/22/2023 20230324 17.13 CHECK 482112 TOTAL: 17.13 482113 03/24/2023 PRTD 103235 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BAND 23EP0402 03/21/2023 20230324 150.00 CHECK 482113 TOTAL: 150.00 482114 03/24/2023 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009006787 02/22/2023 20230324 3,054.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009006786 02/22/2023 20230324 2,000.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482114 TOTAL: 5,054.00 482115 03/24/2023 PRTD 140274 CIVICPLUS, LLC 254993 02/24/2023 20230324 931.24 CHECK 482115 TOTAL: 931.24 482116 03/24/2023 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 677203 03/08/2023 20230324 299.20 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 677206 03/08/2023 20230324 184.40 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 677207 03/08/2023 20230324 96.75 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 677241 03/08/2023 20230324 -44.52 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 677204 03/08/2023 20230324 495.60 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 677205 03/08/2023 20230324 144.50 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 648675 08/31/2022 20230324 902.50 CHECK 482116 TOTAL: 2,078.43 482117 03/24/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0373022-03/23 03/17/2023 20230324 33.90 CHECK 482117 TOTAL: 33.90 482118 03/24/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0740105-03/23 03/18/2023 20230324 85.77 CHECK 482118 TOTAL: 85.77 482119 03/24/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0023973-03/23 03/03/2023 20230324 9.00 CHECK 482119 TOTAL: 9.00 482120 03/24/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0540232-03/23 03/08/2023 20230324 95.91 CHECK 482120 TOTAL: 95.91 482121 03/24/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0007539-03/23 03/08/2023 20230324 890.37 CHECK 482121 TOTAL: 890.37 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482122 03/24/2023 PRTD 135711 CONFLUENCE INC 25652 02/22/2023 20230324 800.00 CONFLUENCE INC 25654 02/23/2023 20230324 8,040.25 CHECK 482122 TOTAL: 8,840.25 482123 03/24/2023 PRTD 101403 CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING INC LC00081744 02/24/2023 20230324 434.91 CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING INC LC00081736 02/24/2023 20230324 1,410.32 CHECK 482123 TOTAL: 1,845.23 482124 03/24/2023 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X90164407 02/28/2023 20230324 586.00 CHECK 482124 TOTAL: 586.00 482125 03/24/2023 PRTD 103799 CURBSIDE LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION 269712 02/25/2023 20230324 1,877.82 CHECK 482125 TOTAL: 1,877.82 482126 03/24/2023 PRTD 123995 DICKS SANITATION SERIVCEINC 8830158T460 03/01/2023 20230324 398.69 CHECK 482126 TOTAL: 398.69 482127 03/24/2023 PRTD 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC P06541 02/21/2023 20230324 293.92 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC P06545 02/22/2023 20230324 276.74 CHECK 482127 TOTAL: 570.66 482128 03/24/2023 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8403357 02/21/2023 20230324 40.03 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-479551 02/21/2023 20230324 44.44 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8404170 02/22/2023 20230324 48.31 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8410218 02/24/2023 20230324 43.28 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-479933 02/27/2023 20230324 682.89 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8416307 02/27/2023 20230324 200.80 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8370933 02/09/2023 20230324 66.90 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-479623 02/22/2023 20230324 -91.82 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482128 TOTAL: 1,034.83 482129 03/24/2023 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-9326 03/03/2023 20230324 240.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-9398 03/09/2023 20230324 361.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-9401 03/09/2023 20230324 361.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-9399 03/09/2023 20230324 321.00 CHECK 482129 TOTAL: 1,283.00 482130 03/24/2023 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0507610 02/24/2023 20230324 1,562.18 CHECK 482130 TOTAL: 1,562.18 482131 03/24/2023 PRTD 116492 BRIDGETOWER OPCO, LLC 745108581 02/23/2023 20230324 130.35 CHECK 482131 TOTAL: 130.35 482132 03/24/2023 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 660311 02/22/2023 20230324 127.60 CHECK 482132 TOTAL: 127.60 482133 03/24/2023 PRTD 142145 FISCHER BROS LLC 1955-674 02/24/2023 20230324 1,186.50 FISCHER BROS LLC 1955-672 02/24/2023 20230324 2,222.50 FISCHER BROS LLC 1955-673 02/24/2023 20230324 1,484.00 CHECK 482133 TOTAL: 4,893.00 482134 03/24/2023 PRTD 102727 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC 001-1710125 02/24/2023 20230324 1,068.95 CHECK 482134 TOTAL: 1,068.95 482135 03/24/2023 PRTD 104716 GALE-TEC ENGINEERING INC 3339 12/05/2022 20230324 2,490.00 CHECK 482135 TOTAL: 2,490.00 482136 03/24/2023 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1824268 02/21/2023 20230324 18.58 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1824278 02/21/2023 20230324 18.58 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1824290 02/21/2023 20230324 18.58 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1824297 02/21/2023 20230324 18.58 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1827322 02/24/2023 20230324 321.36 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 023409157 01/31/2023 20230324 -228.00 CHECK 482136 TOTAL: 167.68 482137 03/24/2023 PRTD 101931 HANESBRANDS INC 41985948 02/22/2023 20230324 474.13 HANESBRANDS INC 41987064 02/27/2023 20230324 906.60 CHECK 482137 TOTAL: 1,380.73 482138 03/24/2023 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9617461042 02/22/2023 20230324 28.33 WW GRAINGER 9618878244 02/23/2023 20230324 76.20 CHECK 482138 TOTAL: 104.53 482139 03/24/2023 PRTD 100790 HACH COMPANY 13475590 02/21/2023 20230324 321.54 CHECK 482139 TOTAL: 321.54 482140 03/24/2023 PRTD 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 23EP0406 03/21/2023 20230324 250.00 CHECK 482140 TOTAL: 250.00 482141 03/24/2023 PRTD 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 261456-1 02/23/2023 20230324 8.75 CHECK 482141 TOTAL: 8.75 482142 03/24/2023 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 236936 02/15/2023 20230324 9,631.40 CHECK 482142 TOTAL: 9,631.40 482143 03/24/2023 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 3244 02/19/2023 20230324 196.00 CHECK 482143 TOTAL: 196.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482144 03/24/2023 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6408902 02/22/2023 20230324 7,243.20 CHECK 482144 TOTAL: 7,243.20 482145 03/24/2023 PRTD 102070 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE 050923-1300-2130 03/22/2023 20230324 40.00 CHECK 482145 TOTAL: 40.00 482146 03/24/2023 PRTD 143585 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 75671 02/22/2023 20230324 1,700.00 CHECK 482146 TOTAL: 1,700.00 482147 03/24/2023 PRTD 160637 HGS LLC IN34236 02/02/2023 20230324 811.25 CHECK 482147 TOTAL: 811.25 482148 03/24/2023 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 588385 03/07/2023 20230324 672.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 588390 03/07/2023 20230324 819.90 HOHENSTEINS INC 588389 03/07/2023 20230324 157.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 588388 03/07/2023 20230324 1,721.10 CHECK 482148 TOTAL: 3,371.00 482149 03/24/2023 PRTD 160239 HUEBSCH LAUNDRY CO 20210734 02/27/2023 20230324 208.38 CHECK 482149 TOTAL: 208.38 482150 03/24/2023 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 15633 03/09/2023 20230324 102.00 CHECK 482150 TOTAL: 102.00 482151 03/24/2023 PRTD 146337 INDUSTRIAL BATTERY PRODUCTS INC 80047545 02/20/2023 20230324 29.51 CHECK 482151 TOTAL: 29.51 482152 03/24/2023 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 603462 02/23/2023 20230324 200.00 CHECK 482152 TOTAL: 200.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482153 03/24/2023 PRTD 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 0184502-23 02/27/2023 20230324 265.00 CHECK 482153 TOTAL: 265.00 482154 03/24/2023 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 6772 03/03/2023 20230324 78.00 CHECK 482154 TOTAL: 78.00 482155 03/24/2023 PRTD 100828 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 71506 02/21/2023 20230324 518.00 CHECK 482155 TOTAL: 518.00 482156 03/24/2023 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC UTILITIES-02/2023 02/25/2023 20230324 162.03 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC ELEC-02/2023 02/25/2023 20230324 14.84 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC EQUIP OPS-02/2023 02/25/2023 20230324 3.35 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC POLICE-02/2023 02/25/2023 20230324 34.82 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC FIRE-02/2023 02/25/2023 20230324 58.45 CHECK 482156 TOTAL: 273.49 482157 03/24/2023 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 357122 03/03/2023 20230324 -3.10 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3591144 03/09/2023 20230324 1,036.35 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3591279 03/09/2023 20230324 55.40 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3591146 03/09/2023 20230324 1,344.58 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3591145 03/09/2023 20230324 3,266.55 CHECK 482157 TOTAL: 5,699.78 482158 03/24/2023 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553098 03/03/2023 20230324 2,202.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6553101 03/02/2023 20230324 5,843.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556650 03/09/2023 20230324 294.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556651 03/09/2023 20230324 177.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556652 03/09/2023 20230324 712.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556653 03/09/2023 20230324 253.91 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556654 03/09/2023 20230324 1,219.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556663 03/09/2023 20230324 32.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556665 03/09/2023 20230324 529.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556666 03/09/2023 20230324 716.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556667 03/09/2023 20230324 1,050.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556664 03/09/2023 20230324 952.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556656 03/09/2023 20230324 337.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556660 03/09/2023 20230324 999.52 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556659 03/09/2023 20230324 1,439.79 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556658 03/09/2023 20230324 1,490.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556657 03/09/2023 20230324 1,408.56 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6556655 03/09/2023 20230324 595.90 CHECK 482158 TOTAL: 20,255.87 482159 03/24/2023 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7417954 03/02/2023 20230324 7,825.60 WINE MERCHANTS 7418768 03/09/2023 20230324 1,330.60 WINE MERCHANTS 7418770 03/09/2023 20230324 901.79 WINE MERCHANTS 7418769 03/09/2023 20230324 497.60 CHECK 482159 TOTAL: 10,555.59 482160 03/24/2023 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249812 03/04/2023 20230324 5,503.62 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2249809 03/02/2023 20230324 5,858.01 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254203 03/09/2023 20230324 38.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254208 03/09/2023 20230324 110.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254207 03/09/2023 20230324 2,824.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254205 03/09/2023 20230324 917.51 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254204 03/09/2023 20230324 1,086.29 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254206 03/09/2023 20230324 2,207.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254209 03/09/2023 20230324 4,060.79 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254221 03/09/2023 20230324 4,079.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254224 03/09/2023 20230324 614.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254227 03/09/2023 20230324 1,023.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254222 03/09/2023 20230324 914.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254223 03/09/2023 20230324 193.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254226 03/09/2023 20230324 292.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254210 03/09/2023 20230324 1,282.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254217 03/09/2023 20230324 318.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254216 03/09/2023 20230324 356.61 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254215 03/09/2023 20230324 1,641.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254211 03/09/2023 20230324 1,524.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254214 03/09/2023 20230324 2,490.99 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2254213 03/09/2023 20230324 1,936.80 CHECK 482160 TOTAL: 39,276.79 482161 03/24/2023 PRTD 145396 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 005347 03/08/2023 20230324 191.00 CHECK 482161 TOTAL: 191.00 482162 03/24/2023 PRTD 137525 KERNS, JOHN 23EP0420 03/21/2023 20230324 250.00 CHECK 482162 TOTAL: 250.00 482163 03/24/2023 PRTD 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO 16892345 02/21/2023 20230324 144.00 CHECK 482163 TOTAL: 144.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482164 03/24/2023 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 23967226 01/31/2023 20230324 12,549.39 CHECK 482164 TOTAL: 12,549.39 482165 03/24/2023 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 01-977504 02/24/2023 20230324 48.94 CHECK 482165 TOTAL: 48.94 482166 03/24/2023 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 55752 03/07/2023 20230324 146.00 LIBATION PROJECT 55753 03/07/2023 20230324 331.96 CHECK 482166 TOTAL: 477.96 482167 03/24/2023 PRTD 100858 LOGIS 53492 02/24/2023 20230324 10,376.25 LOGIS 53524-2 02/24/2023 20230324 428.40 LOGIS 53524-1 02/24/2023 20230324 1,549.13 LOGIS 53565-2 02/24/2023 20230324 7,467.00 LOGIS 53565-3 02/24/2023 20230324 12,039.40 CHECK 482167 TOTAL: 31,860.18 482168 03/24/2023 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51767 03/08/2023 20230324 138.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51765 03/08/2023 20230324 129.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51766 03/08/2023 20230324 207.70 CHECK 482168 TOTAL: 474.70 482169 03/24/2023 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 107930 02/24/2023 20230324 1,862.00 CHECK 482169 TOTAL: 1,862.00 482170 03/24/2023 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV944068 03/08/2023 20230324 209.46 CHECK 482170 TOTAL: 209.46 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482171 03/24/2023 PRTD 160641 MCMASTER-CARR 92372861 02/27/2023 20230324 56.22 CHECK 482171 TOTAL: 56.22 482172 03/24/2023 PRTD 146040 STRAYER, JUSTIN 22174 03/08/2023 20230324 104.00 STRAYER, JUSTIN 22172 03/08/2023 20230324 339.92 STRAYER, JUSTIN 22176 03/08/2023 20230324 444.75 CHECK 482172 TOTAL: 888.67 482173 03/24/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 57936 02/21/2023 20230324 25.39 CHECK 482173 TOTAL: 25.39 482174 03/24/2023 PRTD 134067 METRO BLOOMS 1692 02/16/2023 20230324 600.00 CHECK 482174 TOTAL: 600.00 482175 03/24/2023 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 531021 02/24/2023 20230324 35.64 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 531043 02/27/2023 20230324 33.89 CHECK 482175 TOTAL: 69.53 482176 03/24/2023 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 11666 03/03/2023 20230324 136.00 MILK AND HONEY LLC 11684 03/09/2023 20230324 136.00 MILK AND HONEY LLC 11685 03/09/2023 20230324 502.00 CHECK 482176 TOTAL: 774.00 482177 03/24/2023 PRTD 144836 MINNEAPOLIS COMMERCIAL MOWER INC 022723 02/27/2023 20230324 599.00 CHECK 482177 TOTAL: 599.00 482178 03/24/2023 PRTD 116498 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE BAND 23EP0423 03/21/2023 20230324 150.00 CHECK 482178 TOTAL: 150.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482179 03/24/2023 PRTD 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCI 14278 02/24/2023 20230324 117.00 CHECK 482179 TOTAL: 117.00 482180 03/24/2023 PRTD 145641 MINNESOTA MANDOLIN ORCHESTRA 23EP0416 03/21/2023 20230324 150.00 CHECK 482180 TOTAL: 150.00 482181 03/24/2023 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 34284 02/27/2023 20230324 110.00 CHECK 482181 TOTAL: 110.00 482182 03/24/2023 PRTD 160279 MNCCC - MINNESOTA COUNTRIES COMPU 2302115 02/24/2023 20230324 220.00 CHECK 482182 TOTAL: 220.00 482183 03/24/2023 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-39285 03/07/2023 20230324 116.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-39286 03/07/2023 20230324 246.00 CHECK 482183 TOTAL: 362.00 482184 03/24/2023 PRTD 120999 MOHAWK RESOURCES LTD 60469 02/21/2023 20230324 15,393.85 CHECK 482184 TOTAL: 15,393.85 482185 03/24/2023 PRTD 130461 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, INC INV-31639 12/01/2022 20230324 1,982.00 CHECK 482185 TOTAL: 1,982.00 482186 03/24/2023 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 201443 03/08/2023 20230324 828.50 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 201441 03/08/2023 20230324 963.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 201442 03/08/2023 20230324 729.50 CHECK 482186 TOTAL: 2,521.00 482187 03/24/2023 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-13204 03/08/2023 20230324 100.00 CHECK 482187 TOTAL: 100.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482188 03/24/2023 PRTD 999995 Adriatic Construction LLC ED198119-REFUND 03/22/2023 20230324 2,500.00 CHECK 482188 TOTAL: 2,500.00 482189 03/24/2023 PRTD 999995 Charles Cudd Co LLC ED182877-REFUND 03/22/2023 20230324 2,500.00 CHECK 482189 TOTAL: 2,500.00 482190 03/24/2023 PRTD 999995 Johnson, Patricia ED185949-REFUND 03/16/2023 20230324 10,000.00 CHECK 482190 TOTAL: 10,000.00 482191 03/24/2023 PRTD 999994 Hero Plumbing Heating & Cooling ED203584-REFUND 03/16/2023 20230324 169.93 CHECK 482191 TOTAL: 169.93 482192 03/24/2023 PRTD 999994 Perfection Heating and AC ED203698-REFUND 03/21/2023 20230324 330.00 CHECK 482192 TOTAL: 330.00 482193 03/24/2023 PRTD 999994 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT ED203491-REFUND 03/20/2023 20230324 95.97 CHECK 482193 TOTAL: 95.97 482194 03/24/2023 PRTD 999996 Doran Companies 18167-REFUND 02/28/2023 20230324 166.66 CHECK 482194 TOTAL: 166.66 482195 03/24/2023 PRTD 999996 Tilahun, Abel 49863243-REFUND 02/27/2023 20230324 31.49 CHECK 482195 TOTAL: 31.49 482196 03/24/2023 PRTD 160439 OPTIRTC INC 1036-OP1084.0-1 02/22/2023 20230324 6,000.00 OPTIRTC INC 1036-OP1084.0-2 02/22/2023 20230324 700.00 CHECK 482196 TOTAL: 6,700.00 482197 03/24/2023 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195278 03/07/2023 20230324 465.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195274 03/07/2023 20230324 240.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195275 03/07/2023 20230324 2,136.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195301 03/07/2023 20230324 2,136.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195303 03/07/2023 20230324 1,419.50 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195306 03/07/2023 20230324 959.50 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195287 03/07/2023 20230324 2,670.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195283 03/07/2023 20230324 1,419.50 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 195292 03/07/2023 20230324 1,297.00 CHECK 482197 TOTAL: 12,742.50 482198 03/24/2023 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 54979811 01/23/2023 20230324 317.33 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 54269304 03/06/2023 20230324 1,590.96 CHECK 482198 TOTAL: 1,908.29 482199 03/24/2023 PRTD 130212 POWDER COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC 59996 02/27/2023 20230324 820.00 CHECK 482199 TOTAL: 820.00 482200 03/24/2023 PRTD 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1041301 02/23/2023 20230324 100.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1041303 02/23/2023 20230324 975.00 CHECK 482200 TOTAL: 1,075.00 482201 03/24/2023 PRTD 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC 319293642 02/28/2023 20230324 15.00 CHECK 482201 TOTAL: 15.00 482202 03/24/2023 PRTD 102642 PRESTIGE FLAG 719145 02/21/2023 20230324 1,968.93 CHECK 482202 TOTAL: 1,968.93 482203 03/24/2023 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-51534 03/09/2023 20230324 310.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-51538 03/09/2023 20230324 397.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-51535 03/09/2023 20230324 423.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482203 TOTAL: 1,130.00 482204 03/24/2023 PRTD 131685 QUADIENT LEASING US, INC. N9804436 02/09/2023 20230324 871.95 CHECK 482204 TOTAL: 871.95 482205 03/24/2023 PRTD 125936 REINDERS INC 3093578-00 02/21/2023 20230324 541.45 CHECK 482205 TOTAL: 541.45 482206 03/24/2023 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 86739 02/24/2023 20230324 2,601.25 CHECK 482206 TOTAL: 2,601.25 482207 03/24/2023 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 238149585 02/21/2023 20230324 26.28 ORKIN 238150065 02/21/2023 20230324 30.00 ORKIN 236876227 01/24/2023 20230324 30.00 CHECK 482207 TOTAL: 86.28 482208 03/24/2023 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 761126 02/27/2023 20230324 133.10 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 761145 02/27/2023 20230324 99.43 CHECK 482208 TOTAL: 232.53 482209 03/24/2023 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC R002889366 02/27/2023 20230324 124.21 CHECK 482209 TOTAL: 124.21 482210 03/24/2023 PRTD 144182 SENSOURCE INC 54837 01/03/2023 20230324 792.00 CHECK 482210 TOTAL: 792.00 482211 03/24/2023 PRTD 144705 DILEMMA BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2580 03/07/2023 20230324 60.00 CHECK 482211 TOTAL: 60.00 482212 03/24/2023 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2868266 03/09/2023 20230324 72.86 KELBRO COMPANY 2868333 03/09/2023 20230324 135.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482212 TOTAL: 208.76 482213 03/24/2023 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 594442 02/22/2023 20230324 24.54 CHECK 482213 TOTAL: 24.54 482214 03/24/2023 PRTD 140243 PK BLOODY MARY CORP 2142 03/08/2023 20230324 82.68 PK BLOODY MARY CORP 2141 03/08/2023 20230324 39.00 CHECK 482214 TOTAL: 121.68 482215 03/24/2023 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN62731 03/07/2023 20230324 207.50 CHECK 482215 TOTAL: 207.50 482216 03/24/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2318588 02/28/2023 20230324 7,294.93 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320931 03/08/2023 20230324 3,318.73 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320933 03/08/2023 20230324 1,714.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320927 03/08/2023 20230324 201.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320930 03/08/2023 20230324 192.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320929 03/08/2023 20230324 1,032.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320932 03/08/2023 20230324 914.76 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320928 03/08/2023 20230324 133.79 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320941 03/08/2023 20230324 3,789.97 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320942 03/08/2023 20230324 918.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320940 03/08/2023 20230324 2,664.81 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320943 03/08/2023 20230324 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320938 03/08/2023 20230324 1,097.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320939 03/08/2023 20230324 1,702.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320937 03/08/2023 20230324 5,447.55 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320935 03/08/2023 20230324 2,618.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320936 03/08/2023 20230324 176.30 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2320934 03/08/2023 20230324 1,072.80 CHECK 482216 TOTAL: 34,388.35 482217 03/24/2023 PRTD 102371 STANDARD SPRING PARTS 397558 02/27/2023 20230324 1,020.95 CHECK 482217 TOTAL: 1,020.95 482218 03/24/2023 PRTD 105842 MINER, LTD 798730 02/21/2023 20230324 400.82 CHECK 482218 TOTAL: 400.82 482219 03/24/2023 PRTD 139006 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000762022 02/28/2023 20230324 25.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000942022 02/28/2023 20230324 25.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000922022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000772022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000782022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000792022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000802022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000812022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000822022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706001022022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000832022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000842022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000852022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000862022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000872022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000882022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000892022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000902022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2706000912022 02/28/2023 20230324 100.00 CHECK 482219 TOTAL: 1,750.00 482220 03/24/2023 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REVIEW-WM-599 03/13/2023 20230324 150.00 CHECK 482220 TOTAL: 150.00 482221 03/24/2023 PRTD 139006 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY ALR0146027X 02/25/2023 20230324 100.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY ABR0301564X 02/25/2023 20230324 10.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY ABR0302788X 02/25/2023 20230324 40.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY ALR0146720X 02/25/2023 20230324 100.00 CHECK 482221 TOTAL: 250.00 482222 03/24/2023 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 2023-1270011 03/23/2023 20230324 23.00 CHECK 482222 TOTAL: 23.00 482223 03/24/2023 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 49288 03/06/2023 20230324 105.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 49300 03/07/2023 20230324 231.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 49298 03/06/2023 20230324 105.00 CHECK 482223 TOTAL: 441.00 482224 03/24/2023 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1606250 12/19/2022 20230324 9,415.26 STREICHERS INC I1618407 02/21/2023 20230324 220.00 STREICHERS INC I1618680 02/23/2023 20230324 3,525.40 STREICHERS INC I1618681 02/23/2023 20230324 2,531.52 STREICHERS INC I1619047 02/24/2023 20230324 180.00 CHECK 482224 TOTAL: 15,872.18 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 482225 03/24/2023 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 122776P 02/27/2023 20230324 765.20 CHECK 482225 TOTAL: 765.20 482226 03/24/2023 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447519132 03/02/2023 20230324 511.68 CHECK 482226 TOTAL: 511.68 482227 03/24/2023 PRTD 146347 TELEFLEX FUNDING LLC 9506632343 02/21/2023 20230324 2,660.00 CHECK 482227 TOTAL: 2,660.00 482228 03/24/2023 PRTD 102742 TOLTZ KING DUVALL ANDERSON & ASSO 002023000327 02/06/2023 20230324 2,969.55 CHECK 482228 TOTAL: 2,969.55 482229 03/24/2023 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S5703 02/16/2023 20230324 835.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S5808 02/21/2023 20230324 486.00 CHECK 482229 TOTAL: 1,321.00 482230 03/24/2023 PRTD 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 91138823 02/22/2023 20230324 283.25 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 91139281 02/22/2023 20230324 1,205.10 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 91139712 02/22/2023 20230324 378.54 CHECK 482230 TOTAL: 1,866.89 482231 03/24/2023 PRTD 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 97095 02/21/2023 20230324 30.00 CHECK 482231 TOTAL: 30.00 482232 03/24/2023 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2174874 02/22/2023 20230324 400.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2175352 02/24/2023 20230324 890.00 CHECK 482232 TOTAL: 1,290.00 482233 03/24/2023 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2401 03/02/2023 20230324 168.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 482233 TOTAL: 168.00 482234 03/24/2023 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S006690409.001 02/23/2023 20230324 288.60 CHECK 482234 TOTAL: 288.60 482235 03/24/2023 PRTD 160216 NEW VISION TECHNOLOGIES LLC 38969 02/27/2023 20230324 1,239.20 CHECK 482235 TOTAL: 1,239.20 482236 03/24/2023 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0325259-IN 03/09/2023 20230324 2,267.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0325266-IN 03/09/2023 20230324 312.08 VINOCOPIA INC 0325265-IN 03/09/2023 20230324 647.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0325262-IN 03/09/2023 20230324 263.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0325263-IN 03/09/2023 20230324 184.58 CHECK 482236 TOTAL: 3,674.66 482237 03/24/2023 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 67437021 02/24/2023 20230324 1,180.86 CHECK 482237 TOTAL: 1,180.86 482238 03/24/2023 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 8869693-2282-7 03/03/2023 20230324 1,809.75 CHECK 482238 TOTAL: 1,809.75 482239 03/24/2023 PRTD 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 12963 02/21/2023 20230324 1,487.68 CHECK 482239 TOTAL: 1,487.68 482240 03/24/2023 PRTD 135181 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 171742 02/27/2023 20230324 2,162.19 CHECK 482240 TOTAL: 2,162.19 482241 03/24/2023 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 229641 03/08/2023 20230324 1,046.67 WINE COMPANY 229640 03/08/2023 20230324 154.45 WINE COMPANY 229643 03/08/2023 20230324 4,280.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 03/23/2023 15:06User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE COMPANY 229642 03/08/2023 20230324 1,560.00 CHECK 482241 TOTAL: 7,041.12 482242 03/24/2023 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00127352 03/07/2023 20230324 270.48 WINEBOW MN00127545 03/09/2023 20230324 992.40 WINEBOW MN00127410 03/07/2023 20230324 1,308.12 CHECK 482242 TOTAL: 2,571.00 482243 03/24/2023 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4094 03/09/2023 20230324 104.70 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4093 03/09/2023 20230324 236.10 CHECK 482243 TOTAL: 340.80 482244 03/24/2023 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000341 03/09/2023 20230324 126.00 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000342 03/09/2023 20230324 58.80 CHECK 482244 TOTAL: 184.80 482245 03/24/2023 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 23571 12/14/2022 20230324 3,871.79 CHECK 482245 TOTAL: 3,871.79 482246 03/24/2023 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC SI000292306-1 02/13/2023 20230324 347.48 CHECK 482246 TOTAL: 347.48 NUMBER OF CHECKS 172 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 513,019.19 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 172 513,019.19 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 513,019.19 Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Parks & Recreation Software Annual Service Fee Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Parks & Recreation Software Annual Service Fee with CivicP lus for $43,763. INTRODUCTION: This is the annual payment for 2023 for Parks & Recreation recreation software system, CivicRec. This system provides a user-friendly and accessible registration sytem for programs and events offered through the Parks and Recreation Department. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Parks & Recreation Software Annual Service Fee Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300035 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tracy Petersen Date: 03/15/2023 Requisition Description:Parks and Recreation Software Annual Service Fee Vendor:CIVICPLUS, LLC Cost:$43,763.05 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Parks and Recreation Software Annual Service Fee BUDGET IMPACT: Parks Admin Fund Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Provides user-friendly & accessible online registration system ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Online system reduces use of paper Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Rachel Finberg, Project Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Aquatic Center Pump Room Design Development Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Aquatic Center Pump Room Design Development services with HGA for $169,390. INTRODUCTION: In 2021, the Aquatic Center had a major electrical failure that made an evaluation of mechanical, electrical, pool filtration equipment, and structure a priority. An assessment was done by HGA and completed in August 2022 that gave the City an estimate of anticipated and required repairs needed for this site. Based on these costs and timeline of disturbances and shutdowns, the City shifted to pursue design and costing for a new facility with transferred equipment and utility services to compare to existing repairs study. HGA provided concept plans for a new pump room location which included consideration of civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical components. Continued development and refinement for these concepts including code reviews and permit initiation will be pursued. Concepts will be taken through design development up to construction documents. Work will be completed under an existing master agreement with HGA Inc. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Aquatic Center Pump Room Design Development HGA Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300036 Department:Engineering Buyer:Rachel Finberg Date: 03/17/2023 Requisition Description:Aquatic Center Pump Room Design Development Vendor:HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC Cost:$169,390.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: In 2021 the Aquatic Center had a major electrical failure that made an evaluation of mechanical, electrical, pool filtration equipment, and structure a priority. An assessment was done by HGA and completed in August 2022 that gave the City an estimate of anticipated and required repairs needed for this site. Based on these costs and timeline of disturbances and shut downs, the City shifted to pursue design and costing for a new facility with transferred equipment and utility services to compare to existing repairs study. HGA provided concept plans for a new pump room location which included consideration of civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical components. Continued development and refinement for theses concepts including code reviews and permit initiation will be pursued. Concepts will be taken through design development up to Construction Documents. Work will be completed under existing Master Agreement with HGA Inc. BUDGET IMPACT: Funded from 2021 budget surplus dedicated to facility maintenance. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This will be designed such that it will increase dependable services to entire community and patrons. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Designed to increase energy efficiency and promote sustainable design - 1 - Amendment No. 004 HGA Commission Number 3857-000-00 In accordance with the PRIME AGREEMENT dated: November 2, 2021 BETWEEN: CITY OF EDINA (OWNER) 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 and: HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC. (ARCHITECT) 420 North 5th Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 for the Project: Edina Aquatic Center Pump Room Replacement SD - DD Billed Under: 3857-012-02 [ X ] authorization is given [ X ]to proceed with Additional Services [ ]to proceed with revised scope of Basic Services [ X ]to incur Reimbursable Expenses AS FOLLOWS: 1. Provide Schematic Design through Design Development drawings and cost estimating for the expansion to the main pump room at the Edina Aquatic Center located at 4300 West 66th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, as more fully detailed in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. The attached proposal, Exhibit A, is only incorporated into this agreement by reference to set forth the scope of services. Any provision that purports to: (a) limit liability, (b) allocate responsibility of risk (including indemnity, guarantee, warrantee, or otherwise), (c) obligate the Architect or any third party in any way, (d) identify or include additional services, (e) provide payment provisions (including amount, timing, or process of payment), (f) provide insurance requirements, or (g) set conditions, exceptions, or other provisions and/or qualifications to services to be performed shall not be deemed a part of this agreement. Any terms and conditions of the proposal are null and void. The following adjustments shall be made to compensation and time. Compensation: (Insert provisions in accordance with the Agreement, or as otherwise agreed by the parties.) The Architect will be compensated for the Additional Services described above on an Hourly Rate basis not to exceed $169,390.00, plus Reimbursable Expenses estimated to be approximately $300.00 Reimbursable Expenses are defined as the actual expenditures made by HGA in the interest of the Project for expenses such as out of town travel and/or living expenses, long-distance communications, reproductions and mailing, data processing, and any state or local taxes imposed where the Project is located. - 2 - Time: (Insert provisions covering time of commencement and completion of authorized services as applicable.) See schedule on Exhibit A. Prompt written notice is required if the services indicated are not needed. SUBMITTED BY: AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN BY: HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC. CITY OF EDINA (Signature) (Signature) Nancy Blankfard, Vice President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) (Date) (Date) AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN BY: AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN BY: CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA (Signature) (Signature) (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) (Date) (Date) Rachel Finberg, Project Manager 952-826-0397 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 DRAFT 2 Re: City of Edina – Edina Aquatic Center Pump Room Replacement SD and DD Proposal for Professional Services Dear Ms. Finberg: At your request, Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc. is pleased to submit this Proposal to provide a schematic and design development drawings and cost estimating of an expansion to the main pump room at the Edina Aquatic Center, located at 4300 W 66th St, Edina, MN 55435. SCOPE OF WORK Based upon our understanding of the Project, HGA will provide the following services: Advance Concept Design Option 1 to a 100% Design Development level. Work includes the following disciplines: Architecture, civil, landscape architecture, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, specifications, aquatic consultant, cost estimating Tasks/Deliverables will include: Initial code review AHJ review at SD and DD phase Department of Health review Review with 9-mile creek watershed district 9-mile creek watershed district permit submittal at end of DD Stormwater management diagram Selective demolition plan Site Plan Landscape Plan Floor plans-including room at deck level Building and wall sections Exterior elevations materials selection Engineering Systems Development Analysis of existing deck to support snow drift from 2 story addition Technical Specifications Architectural Material ID Cost Estimate Aquatic equipment layout, selection and sizing (USAquatics) EXHIBIT A Assumptions: Revit model will be developed Construction cost is $3M 4 design meetings Assumes traditional shallow spread footings with slab on grade. Geotech Report is needed during SD phase to confirm this approach. Survey will be required to move into future construction documents phase Assumes no further structural retrofit required in existing building SCHEDULE Below is a draft of the proposed schedule. COMPENSATION Work will be on an hourly not to exceed amount as indicated below. Includes fees for HGA and aquatic consultant. Proposed Fee Estimated hours SD Phase $74,990 460-500 DD phase $94,400 590-630 TOTAL $169,390 The estimated reimbursable expenses for this work is $300 assuming modest printing and mileage expenses. w:\forms\corres2018\normal.dotm Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Rachel Finberg, Project Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Aquatic Center Changing and Concessions House Concept Design Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of Aquatic Center Changing and Concessions House Concept Design services with HGA for $39,900. INTRODUCTION: HGA has created concepts for replacement of existing Aquatic Center Pump room to address failing infrastructure and required upgrades. In coordination with this effort, HGA will also investigate customer facing items including changing house and concessions to enhance user experience. This will include concepts to address barriers and accessibility as well as functionality of the space. Design will be taken through concept design. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Aquatic Center Changing and Concessions House Concept Design HGA Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300039 Department:Engineering Buyer:Rachel Finberg Date: 03/24/2023 Requisition Description:Aquatic Center Changing & Concession House Concept Vendor:HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC Cost:$39,900.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: HGA has created concepts for replacement of existing Aquatic Center Pump room to address failing infrastructure and required upgrades. In coordination with this effort, HGA will also investigate customer facing items including Changing house and Concessions to enhance user experience. This will include concepts to address barriers and accessibility as well as functionality of the space. Design will be taken through concept design. BUDGET IMPACT: Funded from 2021 budget surplus dedicated to facility maintenance. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This will be designed such that it will increase dependable services to entire community and patrons. It will enhance customer services and remove access barriers. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Designed to increase energy efficiency and promote sustainable design - 1 - Amendment No. 005 HGA Commission Number 3857-000-00 In accordance with the PRIME AGREEMENT dated: November 2, 2021 BETWEEN: CITY OF EDINA (OWNER) 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 and: HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC. (ARCHITECT) 420 North 5th Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 for the Project: Edina Aquatic Center Pool Changing and Concessions House Concept Billed Under: 3857-012-03 [ X ] authorization is given [ X ]to proceed with Additional Services [ ]to proceed with revised scope of Basic Services [ X ]to incur Reimbursable Expenses AS FOLLOWS: 1. Provide a concept design to remodel/expand the pool changing and concessions house at the Edina Aquatic Center located at 4300 West 66th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, as well as develop a concept design for a shared comfort station on the west side of the pool, as more fully detailed in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. The attached proposal, Exhibit A, is only incorporated into this agreement by reference to set forth the scope of services. Any provision that purports to: (a) limit liability, (b) allocate responsibility of risk (including indemnity, guarantee, warrantee, or otherwise), (c) obligate the Architect or any third party in any way, (d) identify or include additional services, (e) provide payment provisions (including amount, timing, or process of payment), (f) provide insurance requirements, or (g) set conditions, exceptions, or other provisions and/or qualifications to services to be performed shall not be deemed a part of this agreement. Any terms and conditions of the proposal are null and void. The following adjustments shall be made to compensation and time. Compensation: (Insert provisions in accordance with the Agreement, or as otherwise agreed by the parties.) The Architect will be compensated for the Additional Services described above on an Hourly Rate basis not to exceed $39,900.00, plus Reimbursable Expenses estimated to be approximately $200.00 Reimbursable Expenses are defined as the actual expenditures made by HGA in the interest of the Project for expenses such as out of town travel and/or living expenses, long-distance communications, reproductions and - 2 - mailing, data processing, and any state or local taxes imposed where the Project is located. Time: (Insert provisions covering time of commencement and completion of authorized services as applicable.) Approximately eight (8) weeks. Prompt written notice is required if the services indicated are not needed. SUBMITTED BY: AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN BY: HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC. CITY OF EDINA (Signature) (Signature) Nancy Blankfard, Vice President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) (Date) (Date) AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN BY: AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN BY: CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA (Signature) (Signature) (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) (Date) (Date) Rachel Finberg, Project Manager 952-826-0397 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 DRAFT Re: City of Edina – Edina Aquatic Center Pool Changing and Concessions House Concept Proposal for Professional Services Dear Ms. Finberg: At your request, Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc. is pleased to submit this Proposal to provide a concept design to remodel/expand the pool changing and concessions house at the Edina Aquatic Center, located at 4300 W 66th St, Edina, MN 55435. We also will develop a concept design for a shared comfort station on the west side of the pool. SCOPE OF WORK Based upon our understanding of the Project, HGA will provide the following services: Pool Changing & Concessions House and visitor experience 1.Tour the existing facility to understand existing conditions. Disciplines include architectural, structural, civil, mechanical, and electrical professionals. 2.Meet with City staff to develop space needs list, including site opportunities and review benchmarks and trends. 3.Develop up to 3 different plan diagrams that could improve conditions. 4.Assess renewable energy options onsite and viability of solar PV. 5.Meet with staff to review and refine options to one preferred direction. 6.Develop preferred direction and provide a cost estimate. 7.Meet with staff to review final direction and make any revisions. 8.Deliverables include: a.Site plan b.Plan diagram c.3d rendering to illustrate architectural character d.Cost estimate e.Narratives from structural, civil, mechanical, and electrical disciplines. Shared Comfort Station (restroom) on the west side of pool (assumes this work will be concurrent with Pool changing house) 1.Tour existing restroom and discuss possible new locations 2.Research agencies that will require feedback and approvals 3.Mechanical/plumbing and civil professionals to discuss system options 4.Meet with staff to review site and architectural character options 5.Develop a preferred direction and provide a cost estimate 6.Deliverables include: a.Site Plan b.Plan diagram EXHIBIT A c. 3d rendering to illustrate architectural character d. Cost estimate e. Narrative from civil and mechanical/plumbing disciplines Assumptions: Workplan accounts for 3 client meetings Assumes an 8-week schedule COMPENSATION HGA anticipates 250-275 hours to perform this scope of work and proposes an hourly fee not to exceed $39,900. The estimated reimbursable expenses for this work, based on milage, is $200. w:\forms\corres2018\normal.dotm Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction with GMH Asphalt Corporation for $5,533,534. INTRODUCTION: The project involves reconstruction of 1.4 miles of local streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalk and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The project area includes Grimes Avenue, Inglewood Avenue, Kipling Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Monterey Avenue and West 40th Street. The preliminary assessment per REU approved at the December 2022 public hearing was $13,800. The estimated assessment per REU with the low bid is $10,700. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project ENG 23-1 Contract 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 Requisition Number 12300037 Department: Engineering Buyer: Aaron Ditzler Date: 03/23/2023 Request for Purchase Requisition Description: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Roadway Reconstruction Vendor: GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION Cost: $5,533,534.01 REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE: QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: The project involves reconstruction of 1.4 miles of local streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalk and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The project area includes Grimes Avenue, Inglewood Avenue, Kipling Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Monterey Avenue and West 40th Street. BUDGET IMPACT: The improvements are listed in the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP number 19-311. The improvements will be funded by special assessments, property taxes, respective utility funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. The Morningside Flood Risk Reduction construction improvements were not included in the CIP and will be funded by the storm water utility fund. The preliminary assessment per REU approved at the December 2022 public hearing was $13,800. The estimated assessment per REU with the low bid is $10,700. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will provide premier, long term core service facilities and provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience. It is necessary to improve the infrastructure and comply with the City’s Living Streets Policy as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. The Morningside Neighborhood has several low and landlocked areas prone to flooding. The project will increase flood hazard resiliency across the neighborhood with no increase in risk to any property. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This project involves rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer, localized rehabilitation and full reconstruction of watermain systems, reconstruction of concrete curb and gutter, construction of new sidewalk, and complete reconstruction of bituminous pavement surfaces. Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to reuse aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. This project includes an alternative storm sewer pipe material (High-Performance Polypropylene (HP PP) vs. reinforced concrete). It addresses sustainability by lowering our carbon footprint from manufacturing processes, transportation and installation of the product, while also being more cost effective. This project will reduce impervious surfaces. 1 1/2015 ENG 22-3 CONTRACT NO. ENG 23-1 THIS AGREEMENT made this 4th day of April, 2023, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and GMH Asphalt Corporation, 9180 Laketown Road, Chaska, MN 55318 (“Contractor”). City and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Instructions to Bidders. C. City of Edina General Contract Conditions. D. Addenda numbers 1 and 2. E. Specifications prepared by Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., dated March 6, 2023. F. Plan sheets numbered 1 to 50. G. Performance Bond. H. Payment Bond. I. Responsible Contractor Verification of Compliance J. Contractor’s Bid dated March 23, 2023. The Contract Documents are to be read and interpreted as a whole. The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work and to require Contractor to provide the highest quality and greatest quantity consistent with the Contract Documents. If there are inconsistencies within or among part of the Contract Documents or between the Contract Documents and applicable standards, codes or ordinances, the Contractor shall provide the better quality or greater quantity of Work or comply with the more stringent requirements. 1.1 Before ordering any materials or doing any Work, the Contractor shall verify measurements at the Project site and shall be responsible for the correctness of such measurements. No extra charges or compensation will be allowed on account of differences between actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated on the Drawings. Any difference that may be found shall be submitted to the City for resolution before proceeding with the Work. 1.2 If a minor change in the Work is necessary due to actual field conditions, the Contractor shall submit detailed drawings of such departure to the City for approval before making the change. The City shall not be required to make any adjustment to either the Contract Sum or Contract Time because of any failure by the Contractor to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. Actual or alleged conflicts or inconsistencies between the Plans and Specifications or other Contract Documents shall be brought to the City’s attention in writing, prior to performing the affected Work. The City’s directions shall be followed by the Contractor. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The City agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment in accordance with the Contractor’s bid $5,533,534.01. 2 1/2015 ENG 22-3 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by City as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. City shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractor. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Edina obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, City shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by City. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Work must be completed and ready for final payment by October 20, 2023. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions; and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and underground facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, 3 1/2015 ENG 22-3 sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by City and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the City the names of the subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the City. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the City and any subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the bid shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 8. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 9. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. City and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding 4 1/2015 ENG 22-3 upon City and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Copyright/Patent. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. G. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Agreement by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. H. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. I. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Agreement is found to be or becomes unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire agreement. J. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. K. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of-way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. L. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the City, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. 5 1/2015 ENG 22-3 M. Responsible Contractor. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3. CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR BY: ____________________________ BY: ____________________________ Its Mayor Its AND ___________________________ AND ___________________________ Its City Manager Its Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Reconstruction Materials Testing Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Morningside C Materials Testing with Braun Interec for $30,544. INTRODUCTION: The construction contract for the Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction improvements will be considered for award by the City Council on April 4, 2023. Braun Intertec will perform sampling, field and laboratory testing for concrete, bituminous and aggregate materials to meet City standards. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Reconstruction Materials Testing ENG 23-1 Materials Testing Agreement 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 Requisition Number 12300040 Department: Engineering Buyer: Aaron Ditzler Date: 03/28/2023 Request for Purchase Requisition Description: ENG 23-1 Morningside C Materials Testing Vendor: BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Cost: $30,544.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE: SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT BUDGET IMPACT: Funding for this contract is from special assessments, the storm fund and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. The recommended quote is within the budget. DESCRIPTION: The construction contract for the Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction improvements will be considered for award by the City Council on April 4, 2023. Braun Intertec will perform sampling, field and laboratory testing for concrete, bituminous and aggregate materials to meet City standards. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will provide premier, long term core service facilities and provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience. It is necessary to improve the infrastructure and comply with the City’s Living Streets Policy as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. The Morningside Neighborhood has several low and landlocked areas prone to flooding. The project will increase flood hazard resiliency across the neighborhood with no increase in risk to any property. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com AA/EOE March 28, 2023 Proposal QTB174695 Aaron Ditzler, PE City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Eng 23-1, BA-462, STS-466, WM-599, SS-533, and S-178 Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ditzler: Braun Intertec Corporation is pleased to submit this proposal to provide construction materials testing services for the Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Improvements project in Edina, Minnesota. We have completed the geotechnical evaluation for this project, so we have a unique understanding of the site and construction challenges. We can aid the construction team by applying this experience and transferring our knowledge developed during the design phase which will provide professional continuity to the construction. Our work on the project to date gives us familiarity with the project team and design development which allows us to understand some of the considerations used when developing the project’s design. Since our inception in 1957, we have grown into one of the largest employee-owned engineering firms in the nation. With more than 1,000 employee owners, retaining our firm gives you access to a diverse range of services and professionals you can consult with if the unforeseen occurs. The size of our company also allows us to respond quickly when schedule constraints occur. Our Understanding of Project We understand the project will include removal of the existing roadway surfaces and some adjacent concrete curbs and sidewalks. Some utilities will be removed and replaced. The roadways will then be reconstructed using the full depth reclamation materials. This project involves the portions of Grimes Avenue, Kipling Avenue, Lynn Avenue, and Monterey Avenue from West 40th Street to West 42nd Street as well as West 40th Street from Natchez Avenue to Grimes Avenue. The project also includes Inglewood Avenue from Grimes Avenue to the City limits, located even with the projection of West 40th Street. Available Project Information This proposal was prepared using the following documents and information. ▪ Project plans and specifications for the Morningside C Roadway Reconstruction by the City of Edina, dated March 6, 2023. ▪ Email correspondence with Aaron Ditzler from the City of Edina. City of Edina Proposal QTB174695 March 28, 2023 Page 2 Scope of Services Services are performed under the direction of a licensed professional engineer. Testing services will be performed on an on-call, as-needed basis as requested and scheduled by you or your on-site project representative. After reviewing available information to determine compliance with project plans and/or specifications and other design or construction documents, our scope of services for the project will be limited to the tasks defined below. Soil Related Services ▪ Observe and evaluate the soils exposed in the bottoms of excavations to determine if the soils are similar to those encountered with the geotechnical evaluation and suitable for support of utilities or pavements. Our engineer can provide consultation for conditions that appear to differ from the geotechnical evaluation. ▪ Measure the in-place dry density, moisture content and relative compaction of fill placed for pavement and/or utility support, and of utility backfill for compliance with the project documents. This task includes performing laboratory Proctor tests to provide maximum dry densities from which the relative compaction of fill can be determined, as well as the use of a nuclear density gauge to measure in-place dry densities and moisture contents. ▪ Perform gradation tests on granular, full depth reclaim, imported aggregate base, and lightweight aggregate materials. Concrete Related Services ▪ Sample and test fresh concrete associated with pavement, sidewalk, stairs, and/or curb-and- gutter for compliance with the project documents, and cast test cylinders for laboratory compressive strength testing. We assume that we will be able to appropriately dispose of excess concrete (and associated wash water) on site at no additional cost to us. ▪ Measure and report the compressive strength of the concrete test cylinders for compliance with the project documents. A set of three cylinders will be tested at 28 days for each set cast. If field cure cylinders are requested, each additional cylinder will be charged at the unit price listed in our cost estimate. Bituminous Related Services ▪ Sample and test bituminous pavement materials for compliance with the project documents. This task includes asphalt content and extracted aggregate gradation tests of the bituminous. Consulting, Project Communication and Reporting Services ▪ Project management, including scheduling of our field personnel. ▪ Review test reports and communicate with you and the parties you may designate such as the project contractor(s), and other project team members, as needed. ▪ Transmit test results to the project team on a weekly basis. City of Edina Proposal QTB174695 March 28, 2023 Page 3 Basis of Scope of Work The costs associated with the proposed scope of services were estimated using the following assumptions. If the construction schedule is modified or the contractor completes the various phases of the project at different frequencies or durations than shown in this proposal, we may need to adjust the overall cost accordingly. The scope of work and number of trips required to perform these services are as shown in the attached table. Notable assumptions in developing our estimate include: ▪ We assume it will take eight trips to complete the nuclear density gauge testing on this project. We understand the project is specified as quality compaction but have estimated eight trips if needed to assist the onsite inspector. ▪ We assume that ten gradation tests will be requested for project full depth reclaim, aggregate base, lightweight aggregate, and for granular materials used on site. ▪ We assume 30 sets of concrete tests will be required to complete the project. Many concrete samples are expected to be able to be picked up on a following days’ concrete placement, but we have also assumed 15 additional trips to site to pick up previous concrete samples when subsequent days do not have concrete being placed for a total of 45 trips for concrete. ▪ We understand an on-site construction observer from the City of Edina will observe the test rolling and quality compaction requirements for this project. ▪ We assume bituminous paving will be completed in six days for this project. ▪ We assume the project engineer of record will review and approve contractor’s quality control submittals and test results. ▪ We assume City of Edina will not be requesting and/or requiring bituminous cores be collected and tested. ▪ You, or others you may designate, will provide us with current and approved plans and specifications for the project. Modification to these plans must also be sent to us so we can review their incorporation into the work. ▪ We will require a minimum of 24 hours’ notice for scheduling inspections for a specific time. Shorter than 24 hours’ notice may impact our ability to perform the requested services, and the associated impacts will be the responsibility of others. If the work is completed at different rates than described above, this proposal should be revised. If the pace of construction is different than described above, this proposal should be revised. City of Edina Proposal QTB174695 March 28, 2023 Page 4 Cost and Invoicing We will furnish the services described herein for an estimated fee of $30,544. Our estimated costs are based on industry averages for construction production. Depending on the contractor’s performance, our costs may be significantly reduced or slightly higher than estimated. A tabulation showing our estimated hourly and/or unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services is also attached. The actual cost of our services will be based on the actual units or hours expended to meet the requirements of the project documents. This cost estimate was developed with the understanding that the scope of services defined herein will be required and requested during our normal work hours of 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Services that we are asked to provide to meet the project requirements or the contractor’s construction schedule outside our normal business hours will be invoiced using an overtime rate factor. The factor for services provided outside our normal work hours or on Saturday will be 1.25 times the listed hourly rate for the service provided. The factor for services provided on Sunday or legal holidays will be 1.5 times the listed hourly rate for the service provided. We have not included premiums for overtime in our cost estimate; however, we recommend that allowances and contingencies be made for overtime charges based on conversations with the contractor. You will be billed only for services provided on a time and materials basis. Because our services are directly controlled by the schedule and performance of others, the actual cost may vary from our estimate. It is difficult to project all of the services and the quantity of services that may be required for any project. If services are required that are not discussed above, we will provide them at the rates shown in the attached table or, if not shown, at our current Schedule of Charges. We will invoice you on a monthly basis. General Remarks We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the various scope components. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. After reviewing this proposal, please sign and return one copy to our office as notification of acceptance and authorization to proceed. If anything in this proposal is not consistent with your requirements, please let us know immediately. Braun Intertec will not release any written reports until we have received a signed agreement. Also, ordering services from Braun Intertec constitutes acceptance of the terms of this proposal (including the attached General Conditions). The proposed fee is based on the scope of services described and the assumption that our services will be authorized within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. City of Edina Proposal QTB174695 March 28, 2023 Page 5 We include the Braun Intertec General Conditions, which provide additional terms and are a part of our agreement. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further, please contact Jeff Casmer at 952.995.2314 (jcasmer@braunintertec.com) or Andrew Valerius at 952.995.2242 (avalerius@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Jeffrey D. Casmer, PE Project Engineer Andrew M. Valerius Account Leader, Senior Project Manager Attachments: Project Proposal General Conditions – CMT (1/1/18) The proposal is accepted. We will reimburse you in accordance with this agreement, and you are authorized to proceed: Authorizer’s Firm Authorizer’s Signature Authorizer’s Name (please print or type) Authorizer’s Title Date Client:Service Description:Work Site Address: W 40th Street and Grimes Avenue Edina, MN City of Edina Aaron Ditzler 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 (926) 826-0300 Construction Materials Testing Edina Imp. No. BA-462, STS-466, WM-599, SS-533, and S-178 Proposal Total:$30,544.00 Description Quantity Units Unit Price Extension Phase 1 Construction Materials Testing Activity 1.1 Soil Testing $11,931.00 126 Project Engineer 30.00 Hour 168.00 $5,040.00 128 Senior Engineer 4.00 Hour 194.00 $776.00 207 Compaction Testing - Nuclear 20.00 Hour 88.00 $1,760.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Utility/Subgrade Testing 8.00 Trips 2.50 20.00 1308 Nuclear moisture-density meter charge, per hour 20.00 Each 26.00 $520.00 1228 Topsoil Testing with nutrients, per sample 2.00 Each 390.00 $780.00 209 Sample pick-up 10.00 Hour 88.00 $880.00 1530AG Asphalt Content of Aggregate Base, per sample 1.00 Each 155.00 $155.00 1162 Sieve Analysis with 200 wash, per sample 10.00 Each 142.00 $1,420.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 24.00 Each 25.00 $600.00 Activity 1.2 Concrete Testing $12,105.00 261 Concrete Testing 75.00 Hour 88.00 $6,600.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Curb & Gutter 12.00 Trips 2.50 30.00 Slabs, Ramps, and Stairs 18.00 Trips 2.50 45.00 1364 Compressive strength of concrete cylinders (ASTM C 39), each 90.00 Each 34.00 $3,060.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Curb & Gutter 12.00 Sets 3.00 36.00 Slabs, Ramps, and Stairs 18.00 Sets 3.00 54.00 278 Concrete Cylinder Pick up - Assumes 15 Additional Trips 15.00 Hour 88.00 $1,320.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 45.00 Each 25.00 $1,125.00 Activity 1.3 Pavement Testing $2,790.00 209 Sample pick-up - 6 trips @ 2 hours 12.00 Hour 88.00 $1,056.00 1530 Asphalt Content, per sample 6.00 Each 155.00 $930.00 1532 Extracted Aggregate Gradation, per sample 6.00 Each 109.00 $654.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 6.00 Each 25.00 $150.00 Activity 1.4 Project Management $3,718.00 226 Project Manager 15.00 Hour 168.00 $2,520.00 228 Senior Project Manager 3.00 Hour 194.00 $582.00 238 Project Assistant 7.00 Hour 88.00 $616.00 Phase 1 Total:$30,544.00 Page 1 of 103/27/2023 04:49 PM Project Proposal QTB174695 City of Edina - Morningside C Roadway Impts., Eng 23-1 General Conditions Construction Material Testing and Special Inspections GC-CMT Page 1 of 2 Section 1: Agreement 1.1 Our agreement with you consists of these General Conditions and the accompanying written proposal or authorization (“Agreement”). This Agreement is the entire agreement between you and us. It supersedes prior agreements. It may be modified only in a writing signed by us, making specific reference to the provision modified. 1.2 The words “you,” “we,” “us,” and “our” include officers, employees, and subcontractors. 1.3 In the event you use a purchase order or other documentation to authorize our scope of work (“Services”), any conflicting or additional terms are not part of this Agreement. Directing us to start work prior to execution of this Agreement constitutes your acceptance. If, however, mutually acceptable terms cannot be established, we have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability to you or others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. Section 2: Our Responsibilities 2.1 We will provide Services specifically described in this Agreement. You agree that we are not responsible for services that are not expressly included in this Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, our findings, opinions, and recommendations will be provided to you in writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings, opinions, or recommendations without our written approval. 2.2 In performing our professional services, we will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of our profession practicing in the same locality. If you direct us to deviate from our recommended procedures, you agree to hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses arising out of your direction. If during the one year period following completion of Services it is determined that the above standards have not been met and you have promptly notified us in writing of such failure, we will perform, at our cost, such corrective services as may be necessary, within the original scope in this Agreement, to remedy such deficiency. Remedies set forth in this section constitute your sole and exclusive recourse with respect to the performance or quality of Services. 2.3 We will reference our field observations and sampling to available reference points, but we will not survey, set, or check the accuracy of those points unless we accept that duty in writing. Locations of field observations or sampling described in our report or shown on our sketches are based on information provided by others or estimates made by our personnel. You agree that such dimensions, depths, or elevations are approximations unless specifically stated otherwise in the report. You accept the inherent risk that samples or observations may not be representative of things not sampled or seen and further that site conditions may vary over distance or change over time. 2.4 Our duties do not include supervising or directing your representatives or contractors or commenting on, overseeing, or providing the means and methods of their services unless expressly set forth in this Agreement. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contractors, and the providing of Services will not relieve others of their responsibilities to you or to others. 2.5 We will provide a health and safety program for our employees, but we will not be responsible for contractor, owner, project, or site health or safety. 2.6 You will provide, at no cost to us, appropriate site safety measures as to work areas to be observed or inspected by us. Our employees are authorized by you to refuse to work under conditions that may be unsafe. 2.7 Unless a fixed fee is indicated, our price is an estimate of our project costs and expenses based on information available to us and our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of our professional judgment and are not guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should allow a contingency in addition to estimated costs. Section 3: Your Responsibilities 3.1 You will provide us with prior environmental, geotechnical and other reports, specifications, plans, and information to which you have access about the site. You agree to provide us with all plans, changes in plans, and new information as to site conditions until we have completed Services. 3.2 You will provide access to the site. In the performance of Services some site damage is normal even when due care is exercised. We will use reasonable care to minimize damage to the site. We have not included the cost of restoration of damage in the estimated charges. 3.3 If we notify you that radiographic or gamma ray equipment or other nuclear testing or measuring device will be used, you will be responsible for the cooperation of your employees and your contractors in observing all radiation safety standards. 3.4 You will notify us of any knowledge or suspicion of the presence of hazardous or dangerous materials present on any work site. If we observe or suspect the presence of contaminants not anticipated in this Agreement, we may terminate Services without liability to you or to others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 3.5 The time our field personnel spend on the job site depends upon the scheduling of the work we are observing or testing. You agree that any changes in scheduling may result in additional costs and agree to pay for those services at the rates listed in our cost estimate. 3.6 You agree to include us as an indemnified party in your contracts, if any, for work by others on the project, protecting us to the same degree as you are protected. You agree to list us as an Additional Insured under your liability insurance policies and to require subrogation be waived against us and that we will be added as an Additional Insured on all policies of insurance, including any policies required of your contractors or subcontractors, covering any construction or development activities to be performed on the project site. Section 4: Reports and Records 4.1 Unless you request otherwise, we will provide our report(s) in an electronic format. 4.2 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other documents and our computer software and data are instruments of our service to you, and they remain our property. We hereby grant you a license to use the reports and related information we provide only for the related project and for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not transfer our reports to others or use them for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold us harmless from claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of such a transfer or use. 4.3 If you do not pay for Services in full as agreed, we may retain work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to us all of our work that is in your possession or under your control. 4.4 Electronic data, reports, photographs, samples, and other materials provided by you or others may be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give us written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. Section 5: Compensation 5.1 You will pay for Services as stated in this Agreement. If such payment references our Schedule of Charges, the invoicing will be based upon the most current schedule. An estimated amount is not a firm figure. You agree to pay all sales taxes and other taxes based on your payment of our compensation. Our performance is subject to credit approval and payment of any specified retainer. 5.2 You will notify us of billing disputes within 15 days. You will pay undisputed portions of invoices upon receipt. You agree to pay interest on unpaid balances beginning 30 days after invoice dates at the rate of 1.5% per month, or at the maximum rate allowed by law. 5.3 If you direct us to invoice a third party, we may do so, but you agree to be responsible for our compensation unless the third party is GC-CMT Revised 1/1/2018 Page 2 of 2 creditworthy (in our sole opinion) and provides written acceptance of all terms of this Agreement. 5.4 Your obligation to pay for Services under this Agreement is not contingent on your ability to obtain financing, governmental or regulatory agency approval, permits, final adjudication of any lawsuit, your successful completion of any project, receipt of payment from a third party, or any other event. No retainage will be withheld. 5.5 If you do not pay us in accordance with this Agreement, you agree to reimburse all costs and expenses for collection of the moneys invoiced, including but not limited to attorney fees and staff time. 5.6 You agree to compensate us in accordance with our Schedule of Charges if we are asked or required to respond to legal process arising out of a proceeding related to the project and as to which we are not a party. 5.7 If we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or if project conditions or the scope or amount of work changes, or if changed labor conditions result in increased costs, decreased efficiency, or delays, or if the standards or methods change, we will give you timely notice, the schedule will be extended for each day of delay, and we will be compensated for costs and expenses incurred in accordance with our Schedule of Charges. 5.8 If you fail to pay us in accordance with this Agreement, we may consider the default a total breach of this Agreement and, at our option, terminate our duties without liability to you or to others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 5.9 In consideration of our providing insurance to cover claims made by you, you hereby waive any right to offset fees otherwise due us. Section 6: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 6.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes without litigation. Such efforts will include, but not be limited to, a meeting(s) attended by each party’s representative(s) empowered to resolve the dispute. Before either of us commences an action against the other, disputes (except collections) will be submitted to mediation. 6.2 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, neither party hereto shall be responsible or held liable to the other for punitive, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, or liability for loss of use, loss of business opportunity, loss of profit or revenue, loss of product or output, or business interruption. 6.3 You and we agree that any action in relation to an alleged breach of our standard of care or this Agreement shall be commenced within one year of the date of the breach or of the date of substantial completion of Services, whichever is earlier, without regard to the date the breach is discovered. Any action not brought within that one year time period shall be barred, without regard to any other limitations period set forth by law or statute. We will not be liable unless you have notified us within 30 days of the date of such breach and unless you have given us an opportunity to investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages. You agree not to make a claim against us unless you have provided us at least 30 days prior to the institution of any legal proceeding against us with a written certificate executed by an appropriately licensed professional specifying and certifying each and every act or omission that you contend constitutes a violation of the standard of care governing our professional services. Should you fail to meet the conditions above, you agree to fully release us from any liability for such allegation. 6.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee which includes a reasonable allowance for risks, you agree that our aggregate liability for all claims will not exceed the fee paid for Services or $50,000, whichever is greater. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk, we will increase our aggregate liability to $100,000 provided that, within 10 days of the date of this Agreement, you provide payment in an amount that will increase our fees by 10%, but not less than $500, to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This increased fee is not the purchase of insurance. 6.5 You agree to indemnify us from all liability to others in excess of the risk allocation stated herein and to insure this obligation. In addition, all indemnities and limitations of liability set forth in this Agreement apply however the same may arise, whether in contract, tort, statute, equity or other theory of law, including, but not limited to, the breach of any legal duty or the fault, negligence, or strict liability of either party. 6.6 This Agreement shall be governed, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state in which our servicing office is located, without regard to its conflict of law rules. The laws of the state of our servicing office will govern all disputes, and all claims shall be heard in the state or federal courts for that state. Each of us waives trial by jury. 6.7 No officer or employee acting within the scope of employment shall have individual liability for his or her acts or omissions, and you agree not to make a claim against individual officers or employees. Section 7: General Indemnification 7.1 We will indemnify and hold you harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by our negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom we are legally responsible. You will indemnify and hold us harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by your negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom you are legally responsible. 7.2 To the extent it may be necessary to indemnify either of us under Section 7.1, you and we expressly waive, in favor of the other only, any immunity or exemption from liability that exists under any worker compensation law. Section 8: Miscellaneous Provisions 8.1 We will provide a certificate of insurance to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional Insured shall be limited to losses caused by our negligence. 8.2 You and we, for ourselves and our insurers, waive all claims and rights of subrogation for losses arising out of causes of loss covered by our respective insurance policies. 8.3 Neither of us will assign or transfer any interest, any claim, any cause of action, or any right against the other. Neither of us will assign or otherwise transfer or encumber any proceeds or expected proceeds or compensation from the project or project claims to any third person, whether directly or as collateral or otherwise. 8.4 This Agreement may be terminated early only in writing. You will compensate us for fees earned for performance completed and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 8.5 If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, then such provision will be modified to reflect the parties' intention. All remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 8.6 No waiver of any right or privilege of either party will occur upon such party's failure to insist on performance of any term, condition, or instruction, or failure to exercise any right or privilege or its waiver of any breach. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2023 Construction Observation and Administration Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for 2023 Construction Observation and Administration Services to Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc for $542,264. INTRODUCTION: This purchase will provide construction observation and administration services to support the 2023 construction season for the following projects: Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction P roject Morningside D/E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project Valley View Road Improvement Project Cornelia Safe Routes to School project primarily along Claremore Drive Warranty work for 2021 projects. SEH will provide services because of City staff turnover. Both of our full-time construction observation staff resigned in 2023, and another staff will be on extended paternal leave in the summer. This contract will be spread among the various funding sources per project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2023 Construction Observation and Administration Services 2023 Construction Observation and Administration Services Agreement 1 BUDGET IMPACT: This purchase is funded from a combination of utility funds (storm sewer, watermain and sanitary sewer), the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund, and special assessments. DESCRIPTION: This purchase will provide construction observation and administration services to support the 2023 construction season. Includes support services for the following projects: • Morningside C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project, • Morningside D/E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project, • Valley View Road Improvements, • Cornelia Safe Routes to School project primarily along Claremore Drive, and • Warranty work for 2021 projects. SEH will provide services due to City staff turnover. Both full time City Engineering construction observation staff resigned in 2023, and another City Engineering staff member will be on extended paternal leave during summer 2023. CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 Requisition Number 12300041 Department: Engineering Buyer: Aaron Ditzler Date: 03/29/2023 Request for Purchase Requisition Description: 2023 Construction Observation and Administration Services Vendor: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. Cost: $542,264.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE: QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will provide premier, long term core service facilities and provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience. It is necessary to improve the infrastructure and comply with the City’s Living Streets Policy as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. The Morningside Neighborhood has several low and landlocked areas prone to flooding. The project will increase flood hazard resiliency across the neighborhood with no increase in risk to any property. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10650 Red Circle Drive, Suite 500, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9229 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action–Equal Opportunity Employer SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT March 29, 2023 RE: City of Edina, Minnesota Morningside C/D/E and Miscellaneous Construction Observation Assistance SEH No. EDINA172361 10.00 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) appreciates the opportunity to submit the attached proposal for construction observation services relative to the referenced project. Project Understanding/Scope of Services We will provide construction observation and administrative services to support the City’s Morningside C/D/E neighborhood reconstruction projects and other miscellaneous projects within the City. It is understood that construction is anticipated to begin by April 17, 2023, and be complete by the end of November 2023. Below is a list of our assumptions. · SEH will provide 1 person for construction observation services at 45 hours/week for 33 weeks at Morningside C/D/E. · SEH will provide 1 person for construction observation services and construction administration at 30 hours/week for 33 weeks at Morningside C/D/E. · SEH will provide 1 person for construction observation services at 25 hours/week for 33 weeks for completing warranty work and miscellaneous observation activities on other City projects. · The City will contract with a materials testing subconsultant separately. SEH will coordinate the testing schedule. · SEH will handle all construction administration including pay applications, shop drawing/submittal reviews, and agendas/minutes for weekly construction meetings. SEH staff will coordinate quantities with City staff for inclusion in pay applications and will attend weekly construction meetings. · SEH will handle the majority of communications with residents. · All construction staking will be completed by City staff. Fees, Billing & Estimated Project Costs If accepted, this supplemental letter agreement describes how we will provide these services for a not-to- exceed fee of $542,264.00. This amount is detailed in the attached Task Hour Budget (THB) and includes our reimbursable expenses. We will bill the City monthly for reimbursable expenses and on an hourly basis for labor. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. Mr. Chad Millner, PE March 29, 2023 Page 2 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. We look forward to working with you and your staff on this project. Please contact me at 952.912.2633 or kmanzke@sehinc.com with questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Kevin Manzke, PE (Lic. MN) Project Engineer Toby Muse, PE (Lic. MN) Client Service Manager Enclosures https://sehincazure-my.sharepoint.com/personal/kmanzke_sehinc_com/documents/desktop/projects/edina - morningside rpr/sla ltr morningside_misc rpr fnl.docx Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2023 City of Edina, Minnesota By: _________________________________ Name _________________________________ Title Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Rachel Finberg, Project Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Change Order for Fire Station #1 Building Automation System Update Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Change Order for Fire Station #1 Building Automation System Update with UHL for $38,200. INTRODUCTION: Additional items requested for the BAS system upgrade at Fire Station #1. During the initial work, the contractor found additional items to maximize energy efficiency, occupant safety and overall environmental control of the building. T his change order includes upgrades to boiler controls, CO2 sensors and connections to the BAS system. This change order will increase the contract to $69,023. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order for Fire Station #1 Building Automation System Update UHL Change Order Proposal Fire Station #1 Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200332 Department: Engineering Buyer: Rachel Finberg Date: 4/04/2023 Requisition Description: Change Order for Fire Station #1 Building Automation System (BAS) Vendor: UHL COMPANY INC Cost: $38,200.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Fire Station #1 BAS upgrades will improve building performance and energy efficiencies. The original scope of work included replacing the existing network controller with new BAS system to incorporate with City network necessary for Fire Station #1 Renovation and HVAC Update. During the initial work, the contractor found additional items to maximize energy efficiency, occupant safety and overall environmental control of the building. This change order includes upgrades to boiler controls, CO2 sensors and connections to the BAS system. BUDGET IMPACT: Project funded with Fire Station #1 Renovation and HVAC update and 2020 Budget Surplus funds designated for HVAC projects. The original contract was $30,823. Change Order #1 is $38,200 for a total contract of $69,023. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project continues the progress on the climate action plan. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Building Automation system includes centralized controls that sensor and allow for increased thermal comfort, control, and efficiency. Page 1 of 2 9065 Zachary Lane N PROPOSAL Maple Grove, MN 55369 Proposal #:HA23021 Date: 02/28/2023 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ To: Edina, City of Project: Edina Fire BAS Adds 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Attention: Rachel Finberg and Noah Silver We propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary to: 1. All below equipment includes new communication wiring and integration to the existing UHL Niagara4 BAS. 2. Provide and install new DDC Controller for Boilers. New temperature and pressure sensors included. 3. Provide and install new DDC Controller for six (6) Bay In-floor heating zones. Flat plate sensors included. No local control. 4. Provide and install two (2) new DDC Controllers for two (2) garage Makeup Air Units and associated EFs a. Lift Included b. Existing actuators and valves are assumed to be in good working condition and will be reused 5. Provide and install two (2) new CO sensors in garage 6. Add graphic and switch position for the Transfer Switch to the BAS 7. Control drawings will be provided at end of job All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of: $38,200.00. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra cost will be executed only upon written order and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. This proposal is valid for 30days. Respectfully submitted: Heather Alderink Account Manager ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The prices, specifications and other Terms set forth on page 2 of this proposal are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined herein. Accepted by: Name (print): Title: Company Name: Date: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 2 Uhl Company, Inc. – Terms and Conditions of Service 1. Customer’s signature on the attached Proposal forms a binding agreement between Customer and Uhl Company, Inc. (“UHL”) for the work described in the Proposal according to the Terms and Conditions contained herein (hereinafter the “Agreement”). 2. UHL agrees to use competent personnel and industry standards to perform its work in a timely and professional manner. 3. All labor is to be performed during UHL’s normal working hours, unless specified elsewhere in the Proposal. 4. The prices contained in the Proposal are good for 30 days. If at any time the materials, equipment or parts contained in the Proposal become subject to a tariff, levy or other price increase of more than 5% due to action by the U.S. or a foreign government, then UHL shall be entitled to an increase in the price of this Agreement equal to increase in the price of the materials, equipment or parts. 5. UHL represents that it carries Worker’s Compensation, general liability, automobile liability, and excess liability insurance policies. Customer shall carry any other insurance necessary for the protection of the project or Customer’s interests. 6. Payment is due within 30 days of UHL’s invoice date. Interest shall accrue on any unpaid balance at a rate of 1.5% per month. Acceptance by UHL of partial payments shall not constitute any release of collection or lien rights that may exist. 7. In the event of Customer’s default of its obligations under this Agreement, other than its payment obligations, UHL will give 10 day’s notice to cure. If Customer remains in default after the 10 day cure period, UHL may terminate this Agreement and recover the balance due, in addition to all expenses, damages and costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by UHL in collecting the outstanding balance owed. In the event Customer fails to make payment within 30 days of being invoiced, UHL may immediately cease all work under this Agreement without notice and cancel this Agreement, at which time the entire Agreement amount shall become due and payable immediately without notice or demand. In addition, Customer shall pay all expenses, damages and costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by UHL in collecting the outstanding balance owed. 8. If, for any reason, Customer directs a cessation of the work on all or any part of the project, UHL shall be paid for the portion of its work completed at the time of cancellation, including all expenses incurred by UHL in securing the project and ceasing work. 9. Unless otherwise specified in the Proposal, UHL will not furnish any performance or material payment bond. If a bond is requested, Customer agrees to reimburse UHL for the cost of the bond. 10. All labor is warranted for 90 days (except in the case of compressor replacements, which carry a 30 day warranty), while materials, equipment and parts are warranted according to manufacturer specifications. UHL’s warranty obligations do not arise if the failure is the result of faulty installation or abuse by others, incorrect electrical connections or alterations made by others, or use under abnormal operating conditions or misapplication of the materials, equipment or parts. Manufacturer warranties may include an allowance for the cost of labor and related costs such as crane rental, refrigerant, etc., for correcting defects in material and workmanship. If the standard manufacturer’s warranty does not provide for this additional coverage, Customer shall be responsible for payment of these costs to UHL. 11. UHL MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ANY SUCH WARRANTY IS HEREBY DISCLAIMED BY UHL AND EXCLUDED FROM THIS AGREEMENT. UHL’s WARRANTY SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDES COVERAGE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, SUCH AS MOLD. UHL HAS MADE NO INSPECTION FOR, NOR MADE ANY REPRESENTATION REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF MOLD ON THE CUSTOMER’S PREMISES. UHL HAS FURTHER MADE NO PROMISE OR AFFIRMATION THAT THE MATERIALS AND LABOR PROVIDED WILL ASSIST IN THE PREVENTION OR REMEDIATION OF MOLD OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS. 12. ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST UHL MUST BE BROUGHT WITHIN ONE YEAR OF PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. UHL’S LIABILITY FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS ARISING FROM OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED TO UHL’S WORK UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS AGREEMENT. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, WHETHER ARISING IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), EQUITY OR OTHERWISE, WILL UHL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF PROFIT, INCREASED OPERATING OR MAINTENANCE EXPENSES, CLAIMS OF CUSTOMER'S TENANTS OR CLIENTS, OR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING FROM OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED TO UHL’S WORK UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. 13. UHL’s pricing does not include any cost that may be incurred due to the existence of hazardous material or its removal or disposal, unless specifically provided for in the Agreement. If costs are incurred by UHL due to the existence of hazardous material, those costs will be paid by Customer without the need for written approval. 14. This Agreement, including these Terms and Conditions and the Proposal, constitutes the entire agreement and complete understanding between the parties. No verbal representations shall be binding on either party and Customer agrees that it is not relying on any representation made by UHL that is not contained herein. 15. These Terms and Conditions may in some instances conflict with terms and conditions or other documents issued by Customer. In such case, the Terms and Conditions contained herein shall govern and Customer acknowledges and agrees that acceptance of this Proposal is conditioned upon Customer’s acceptance of the Terms and Conditions herein. 16. UHL shall not be liable for any penalty or damage, delay or injury, or for failure to give notice of delay, or to perform, when such damage, delay, injury or failure is due to the elements, acts of god, acts of the owner, act of civil or military authority, war, riots, terrorism, concerted labor action, strikes, shortages of materials, accidents or any causes beyond the reasonable control of UHL. If such a delay occurs, the completion date shall be deemed extended for a period of time equal to the time lost due to any delay excusable under this provision. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Staff Response to Lake Cornelia Traffic Safety Petition Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve staff's recommendation to collect additional traffic data spring/summer 2023 and return to City Council for further discussion. INTRODUCTION: On December 6, 2022, City Council received a petition to address safety concerns of residents with the Lake Cornelia neighborhood and Point of France Condominiums. Among the concerns specifically mentioned in the petition include speeding, inattentive drivers and dangerous crosswalks. 364 residents signed the petition, representing 269 adjacent properties. See attached staff report and supporting materials. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Lake Cornelia Traffic Safety Petition Cornelia Petition Graphic Petition Received December 6, 2022 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 April 4, 2023 Mayor and City Council Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Staff Response to Lake Cornelia Traffic Safety Petition Approve staff’s recommendation to collect additional traffic data spring/summer 2023 and return to City Council for further discussion. Information / Background: On December 6, 2022, City Council received a petition to address safety concerns of residents with the Lake Cornelia neighborhood and Point of France Condominiums. Among the concerns specifically mentioned in the petition include speeding, inattentive drivers, and dangerous crosswalks. 364 residents signed the petition, representing 269 adjacent properties* (see Petition Graphic). Therefore, staff recommends collecting additional traffic data spring/summer 2023 and return to council for further discussion. Existing Conditions The residents within the Lake Cornelia neighborhood and Point of France Condominiums addressed traffic safety concerns that were brought forth in a petition to the City Council regular meeting on December 20, 2022. The Lake Cornelia neighborhood is generally bound by Highway 62 to the north, Highway 100 to the west, W 70th St to the south and Valley View Rd to the east. Within this area are 618 single-family residential properties, the Edina Art Center, the Edina Aquatic Center, Rosland Park and Christ Presbyterian Church. Cornelia Elementary School and Arneson Acres Park are located on the south side of W 70th St. Key roadway corridors within/adjacent to the neighborhood include W 66th St, Valley View Rd, West Shore Dr, Cornelia Dr, Normandale Rd and W 70th St; these roads carry 2,700 to 10,100 vehicles per day. The posted speed limit is 30 mph on W 66th St east of Valley View Rd, Valley View Rd between W 66th St and W 69th St and W 70th St west of Normandale Rd. There are school speed zones on Cornelia Dr between Wooddale Ave and Heatherton Trl (20 mph) and on Cornelia Dr between W 70th St and W 72nd St (15 mph). The speed limit on all other streets is 25 mph. There is a dynamic display speed sign for eastbound traffic on W 70th St between Wooddale Ave and Cornelia Dr. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 * 84 signatures were obtained from Point of France Condominiums (6566 France Avenue). One address on the petition was illegible. Sidewalks are present on W 70th St, W 66th St, Cornelia Dr, Valley View Rd and W 69th St. Bike lanes are present on W 70th St, as well as a bike boulevard on Cornelia Dr/Southdale Rd. No public transit service operates within the neighborhood. There are several pedestrian crossings within or adjacent to the neighborhood, with varying treatment levels (see Table 1). Marked Crosswalk with Road-Side Signs Pedestrian-Activated Flasher/RRFB Traffic Signal W 66th St & Normandale Rd W 68th St & Cornelia Dr W 70th St & Valley View Rd W 66th St & West Shore Dr W 66th St & Cornelia Dr W 66th St & Southdale Rd W 68th St & Valley View Rd W 69th St & Valley View Rd W 70th St & Wooddale Ave W 66th St & Valley View Rd W 70th St & Normandale Rd W 70th St & West Shore Dr W 70th St & Cornelia Dr Table 1: Pedestrian Crossing Treatments in Lake Cornelia Past Improvements In 2006, the City initiated a traffic study for the Greater Cornelia Area/W 70th St to evaluate traffic volumes, speeds and safety concerns. In 2009, the traffic study was presented to City Council, who then authorized staff to pursue implementation. Many of the recommendations have since been implemented (see Table 2). Traffic Study Recommendation Implementation Update 1 Remove of free right from northbound Highway 100 to eastbound W 70th St Completed in 2011 as part of roadway reconstruction project 2 Create of a school speed zone around Cornelia Elementary School Completed in 2009 as part of Edina Speed Zone Study 3 Install “smart” signal system along the corridor, including new traffic signal at West Shore Dr, pedestrian crossing at Wooddale Ave and modifications to existing signal at Cornelia Dr Completed in 2011 as part of roadway reconstruction project REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 4 Parking to remain along corridor where applicable 52% of existing parking spaces were removed in 2011 as part of the roadway reconstruction project to accommodate new bike lanes 5 Install dedicated left-turn lanes at West Shore Dr, Wooddale Ave and Cornelia Dr Completed (these already existed prior to 2009) 6 Install improved signage at the west end of the corridor to redirect motorists to use alternatives routes to access locations further east Per State Statute, legal vehicles can only be prohibited from using Municipal State Aid routes based on weight restrictions. Alternative east-west routes (Highway 62, W 66th St, or W 77th St) are not convenient. 7 Pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction to quiet roadway Completed in 2011 as part of roadway reconstruction project 8 Enhance landscaping along the corridor Completed in 2011 as part of roadway reconstruction project 9 Explore possibilities for offering turnarounds on private property Some property owners opted to have new turnarounds constructed in 2011 as part of roadway reconstruction project 10 Study a roundabout to replace the “T” intersection of W 70th St and Valley View Rd Roundabout constructed in 2011 as part of roadway reconstruction project 11 Further evaluation of roundabouts at the intersection of W 70th St and Highway 100 Traffic signals are owned and operated by MnDOT; additional study is needed to review impact to traffic operations and pedestrian/bicycle facilities Table 2: 2009 Traffic Study Recommendations and Implementation Work Underway The City has three projects currently underway related to traffic safety in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood: 1. The “smart” signal system on W 70th St included provisions to monitor and react to speed and traffic volume in the corridor. For example, the signals could reduce the green light cycle if a certain number of vehicles are observed traveling above the posted speed limit. The “smart” technology is no longer operative nor supported by the vendor. Staff is evaluating whether reimplementing a similar technology would be appropriate based on current traffic patterns. 2. The pedestrian-activated flashers at W 70th St and Wooddale Ave are round amber flashing beacons, which is an older style or equipment. The current industry standard is a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). Various studies have shown that RRFBs can significantly improve the rate at which motorists yield to pedestrians at a crossing. To be consistent with other crossing treatments throughout the City, staff is in the process of replacing the existing flashers with RRFBs. This work is expected to occur this spring or summer depending on the availability of materials. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 3. In 2021, the City reduced speed limits on most local streets to 25 mph. This initiative was part of a comprehensive strategy to address speeding and pedestrian safety. Staff is in the process of collecting traffic data at various locations throughout the City to ascertain the effectiveness of the reduced speed limits. Staff will also compare crash data on local streets two years before and after implementation to assess associated safety impacts. The data collected will help inform future decisions related to infrastructure, enforcement and education. Next Steps Staff recommends collecting additional traffic counts and speed data in spring/summer 2023. Priority roadways for collection will include W 70th St, W 66th St and Valley View Rd; traffic data will be collected on West Shore Dr, Cornelia Dr, Dunberry Ln and Southdale Rd as weather and workload permits. This data will provide staff with an objective understanding of current traffic conditions and will help determine whether improvements are warranted in the neighborhood. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Attachments Petition Graphic Petition Received Dec 6, 2022 / Engineering DeptMarch 2023 Lake Cornelia NeighborhoodTraffic Safety Petition CITYOFEDIN A MIN N ESOTAINCORPORATE D1888 ,e W 70TH ST HWY 100WEST SHORE DRW 66TH ST NORMANDALE RDW 72ND STCORNELIA DRVALLEYFRANCERoslandPark HWY 62 PARKLAWN AVE W 65TH ST EdinaArt Center EdinaAquaticCenter ChristPresbyterianChurch ArnesonAcres Park CorneliaElementarySchool kjkj kj kj kj kj kj kj kjkj kjkj kj kj kj kj kj ##kj kj kj kjkj kj kjVIEW RDAVE!"$ !"$ !"$ !"$!"$ Point of FranceCondominiums kj !"$ kj # Legend Signed Petition Traffic Signal All-Way Stop Roundabout Pedestrian-Activated Flasher City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEWED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL q SIDEWALK q ALLEY PAVING q STORM SEWER q SANITARY SEWER Ei CURB AND GUTTER ONLY El PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER El WATER MAIN El STREET LIGHTING X OTHER: Public Safety Traffic Issues To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City council to act on the issues listed below. Please address traffic safety concerns of Lake Comelia/Point of France residents regarding the number of speeding, inattentive drivers in our neighborhood. Major areas of concern include speeders along 70th, 66th and Valley View Road. Dangerous crosswalks exist along 70th at Wooddale, Cornelia and Valley View & 66th , endangering both children and adults. Residents also report cut-through, speeding traffic along Cornelia, West Shore, Southdale Road and Dunberry, again endangering children and adults. Please, let's address these traffic safety issues before someone is seriously injured or killed. Thank you. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) i(11\ r Andp,,e 69 LLI c orn& /4 Dr S b Pa,h- (c c-Do tireibe,v- G -71 (151(12,dia-- ect, 4-.4 3 (/ wa0,74/e 4„ %A l& 077w...Lirk-, (e_. (LcSeri 4'ca ih)f. This petition was circulated by: 67 L/ 0/00(10,4 te /lye f (S//3) s-o-s'- NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE C Li \VA OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) V L111 (i /) e5- ), tuctriC U\ -1 C4 V) USA 1 -Pto. (---ts\c\ pwlm kcx vely 34pL 1e ?),(4ivAdOVtAiJ6 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) L. /Ht162L-i_tit 6 9 Corilediti 101, K)9 CoolrcIA ort G2 v3 u0\9_40, `bi • (o 0 CO \CV-1 e „ d CO /e Dd/ (dq 0-ertiVkaG HV t 1( 7 n )1/-6,-k 11/( (10c-- ,110 czic 71( A vwfA t P e-Er c\ONA`\ co( fve \c\ CA Ai E t Pe tk 17e-fi-- YbLV h A-- r -77 09 0/6t/M-S f41 SVolvi to 0c-,L ( 3 (.0kAsi This petition was circulated by: k105 09 ,1 /422 )e [7 L-4).7,1 ( Vat) (O vv,t/Li (9L (oC\2-L\ Co AeXic\. 6q-33 Coi29Y 5i-die ‘7)3 2 Cnri.iNJ\ Ciornee, 4r (f (Ac QV c.ovwf. 17 Y , )(0) ru (.\ic ‘k)-- e{ iu\nc e- k ()12.— \-2J--7670 PHONE NAME ADDRESS The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE t,')(.7;7\, -(24 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) Dc, stAAAesAit-'" c:\r\.;h6( ILs Savod 1,14 L. McA4 t_v /A- A (E=t, L-e -44) K--60-k. Cif L\r u) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) u0l) LS 0-)9121, 412-5 P0A1,2e$77 L h Dt"i(frvi Li" L41 (97 g IA/ —Cio.o/e D7. w IVO "so k" 3k lJ Clerk`A-se--4A 4 01-t crPyl D( 6Ji $?,. c-'),L ft (\iL 422-21 This petition was circulated by: y- y\ I- (t\vr\ NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 AitA 6(-1t1 411./ OA 4 -A OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) /4-blSeA) )<J2-0 0)k) Ciephitnrc geA --/Y14‘ V-66(6/VV%- kik \\\' Jos c, crryA Lew; ce G rifsw ..-fkv\ .,e( Mit Aw-c ionickiks- k r\ VVLSV\ PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRLNTED) Odi 1,6°1-7 (7(,(3 6444.1,4 Toy it 6,)6 C6 n€' Dnp ve._ 64,4 ed-2/kt_d6t efiA471 --c-6;6( (&c( _//r-17-/4/t-,C(4 ernO`l acme ti 1:‘u, (0r4-04 Cori eide>11)-L. -407 e_of try .1)e, Oftak___ 7Z-66 151(47)\ CAY. da 7C ( Co (0 Ao 0_06-- Q-L I I It PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE ( 41r11 /14/2" ()-U Patty t 64- A-- / U (cdaey) C oc) I Ock(\ 5c" ev)cy Ira c 854( ix4,.\t-6 Rai y a r)"0 L5-/-)a v This 9 - on was circulated 133h-/ 4,37bi [IC 6C4'‘g- Zio? ( es/44, (i>, Pr, toga I Coin(' rick b1 v9 eorn.dce: 6 61 2- 171P I 610 , Are:te,r NAME Q` iii P)Y-‘ ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) ()Ay] Vl (2-AA-Cc-CA\ 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 4- Ucg yam / 7 4,1 r, ,b71._ 66-1.4J-4 -v1 ?1,2- arroli4 1)( This petition was circulated by: , t(leACtvCfrif C-t NAME ((117) araave_ ,10 t oo (k-*6 ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 1431/7 ay LQ//e--- ( r1) col (:st 404 I 0418 914/L Lc/Les:, L,J 9016 0-01(1v4 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE tagle-/A. )Av„ KA.e7\f-Adc-ONO \f- ca,idiet (A1 iLAQG1_p eitep)ei filitivap gz-ir 64 r ki 14/ eit/iG Li Is( le to LS OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) clie( )7c.) 1(&‘ 5 eV' 0 . "tit IALIM ap,o, li)kp it4N;tA,_ CANsv.s:jtin,akel_ ivy C \Thr ,'>V -env r\ This petition was circulated by: cog.,2c ocAlow4-Nkrt- k) 0 f A YV\ :1)4 ; s 61 \ 0 LA4 I\ (9.41v —2 0 55a - cf„? ci "(-1 `1 NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 ak-vNA cz It‘t-A-S` 6cog .sou- coo Poctd Roafinehainbei-;, &I 33 &cida,a))1 4L,LL C) &S 33 cekb-ec-4 g 32— Dck\(_I 4);..A 8., IA uvAA V\ ) f &J. DE, /2,f; A7oA/ /744 "--1( R)--h vik Eel / nO 7(4hr-- , 1/1 • 1 ti ct -e-tt, D ocI k vP For IiO'' 6ov 1<cor- e)--rackhviewrl E f -c, NiCe, ri.2 4 ei-) te, iv\ 1-- PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) I <--ki\--)1\4 11-C PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) ObS7 nMA,C1--itit <14 ki a, FIN 6k/A6- 57S IL- ()t %-•--\- \NA V-4•A EeS), 6\ cf. t'\ ) 5 ti)((./st L i,t, jA/7 /LA/ b1I 3 PAviSo cl L-64ii e Ike co (49 SM-rt te Rc( (-) °I I b souiltrAl \A 69.11 S'avki-hctole_ VI 00 64kA4(/(12_ 4,ye 4L.6_ ,1,1•(1, This petition was circulated by: r A DF%Ji S (91:kk C OCkAtAdL4ItL- cl 5 A. 9 ' NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) roAck _. ( v7- n6A tc,-)(c3s4 rt-,( \Ni I---• geds-- 47./,,,--4/ /4/6e: (i c xe\yr RA i ,e)(.4) i<ct, f321) i6PriAk1 ctx(cIri°C EI-12ft-P)Inf t Cgr//fr 1601)6 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) G21 Saaivouitc 11d. 6SYC Sar\(, 1 Sexah&olo vor 04„, 6931 ,crwct•hd cdp. R4. Gei Lc; V 3 Rozidih 9°33 v(4), pi u9),,t)- 0,4041e Rk LE2)04-y-x-rnA-DA-c-). i961 6 d 610 al- -r- oct This petition was circulated by: o rA. V)/ . AL))S e75 S 0r.L.G2 Tef, 9 /5:2 - 9•29-44 1--VZ ) NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you qfyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 If\jo r A tkA AO \171 )11_,L)Th (9, OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) c4-1 -ra-456),u G41)(,\ Gar (1 a 1 A CVsN Seip \A NzaCte)Cr\ oututevtl)At, IktIVAlkNies f---;(1/1 LA r\ie-,t-3,, 1--)" ttt. h. A A(lTE ILA-0 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) bi-375 01---kfirA1 AJ A-VE 6,9Z_ fid 041-9/-' PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGN PURE 114,o/v-oio—k_ 1&( .?01)(1 coo,_ dAzi_ This petition was circulated by: Or A )AL); It, 9 •••• I I) ciS 7 •'2 *Lf Lt ? NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE /n. M IC t\c7YA‘Ave) ?v, vv) 711-t o\v\o,q L. I Moarr, 7v-,-/c/RAL A t. 0 .5O— 4_ / Ti:.,c)so(r F-10(0\ &ti )4gi-c;,‘ VP. 11/14/22, 9:12 AM Re: Petition? - E Brumm - Outlook PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) nrad avi-m M Joy v el 7 10 0 1.-Cc046( 1-t;.„ fri loo 7 1-1-e(2116.-/0rf 164 Tom' 4D.W \i\kawc\-\-c-1) r 2 f2Z1 L) 221 This petition was circulated by: Vovi NAME ADDRESS CIC)PW7H 13 PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform ,mu ofrour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 about:blank 1/1 /1,/ -e- `d- ' a-b,y Lice Imo.. ,c)Rtt:1611‘') q, 1 S Ann OVI CA, V (LC I A jA ) A 1)17,i CI Les 1^-4-' 72 32., 1 vle cjvi( rvi o N Ar41) foog&AN 1.44.0,Lf _frz / cr, et- ri Z7// C , •til M I .1141dide/ kic-16,9/41--r•- PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE k 67L-(64 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) I 4 6KA-5.-L k_rr•-• ,c; Peirey GA. k. 1,14c *(Si-/A/ 14,/,L6i 1 0(3'ee e kr0a E-r;C 2 kl s&r-) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 2 a AA/I /1 (2_1)6 L-,_ 1/-;)e.. hl ‘14 IL/ c4 7Z2-( Lr\ 7,217 tviia //e-2.1(teio 6A f /-cle. 122-1 D? 10-466 CL , ‘ (Ir‘CeC Lr MOili,1_4 (4-) 7.1 ! viA ri (: L -7-1-oct .ps -ZYL This petition was circulated by: D aLtvvi 7 23:2- Moiii cc! e) LJ/1 NAME ADDRESS Q52--9.2-0 PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 44/Are (.EE q 5• LA6 um-1 00-. eh AI PA /V 55%-4- .mss n f/ YeK/ 7tia `te.A)ci- 1,1 cc. # Fri t! ES /14 Ct e r 1;"1""ii )() V1 77-6Z2‘ Ltry z.L.1( :,Aeci_xx\ ISAO) Nic) rcY 10/ Ccj-/ 942. A 4452/ /- „cA,',- it ( La s /5112 ( /- (93 tJ Pr ‘26-33 (,),.__Wort 66) CV GI r4 621 LA.) SKsz,n-iz Orio-e (02 511.try L bI vc ‘"/ 5 4G fv4 L-1521 tawcacc. 45-d,c LVL5 L,,A, z' V041, s 1/1(,kr, t.t This petition was circulated by: -1,e‘c Lei' h4 t„.aid‘ NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 ti AA. s ANA HAT-HL) - 4,(zt, K(A---411-e_e_AV k LA:A L ev‘ ocsbA Q rte.t\ t-vik PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME D 0,0 as AN L Act it-Lair . <)/47-7-7 t koe L Dope j- eiL) cA/Ava 64,tzt.,6 0710 * )-ax/Johviy --1-01\or 51-t,ktle j k Iry i erLy Pei-roc PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (PRINTED) Zzeke•I-7- iAlheie— S. eick--&-:-A17-- ri t—Ttmic 40,0 fl rem, \--\e-c,\4(v DO VT) r/M-T4 L . . r IP This etition was circulated by: \IAA-) e -ittg Day..3L0LA_A- 8"14.4.A., iird4 () &I/27 2/-31( CW244e-a-4-e4e, gq-A. 7S6 NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OW. ER'S SIG E OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (PRINTED) gf)wt-( ifrof (11 ll- p/ e C4-re-,g 0 / 7 /7,-,7-7// s C EJ joirme, v-vka. NI\ ncc,kair P 14ekeAA(Alctd Qv Kai/tea/4 frcs,- KeTv\ Pi con 6ii&,,s7&J fe r c ren t_jr\ctSetiA 47 C AtIVA.,1? a 5 42 4fIsr" /6/ re 6033 &nal (4-v-{ ifto 6c(n formeli Aue. 64-32 CALLit 1-1-1 n w Lin,. 4'V G y w. sl4,„„ pe- OB 9102-\1\ilroVei tvi w,t 1--OIZJSL-5" .ck/1/0— 6 s-16 (4). 946, Oz. w 661-1‘ sLIA/A-) This petitionpet.qion was circulated by: 7N.C.)//' Li NAME z-fil cititAm 95,tA 4 ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law. your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 5 6A1 cz,b(cs,), Ikt .;\ \(\c '\Th !Da!, 1:)')(1011) PO Jo 17Laye (4 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) M C tikEL/ E ak) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 1/1-66/ a/te-gf ietio. cottit-r /r e'( q 5 r) C /6INC, A,VC) ref C4 C r CA-", 93-la (Lc-at vtivorc, .1-6/2 0041We (74- This petition was circulated by: 1,\A 2A I cLArzovetz._ cod' q15'-zgzo 404 a, NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 ADDRESS NAME -7300 ho Jo), atvAc-c- 7 3/ .3 '‘k) 12 qVijc Jci1 731 Z- 4. VI R\,1 \ A I,,ShOre 1)r57.S1-35- 5 (/ 5 0-7-6,; ecti 5-5'Yoy gAODW&) "WC- y PHONE cur P 0,11, 1 j ke S The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 "try gros-fAci —6'3 taus This petition was circulat O(5hore Or K. 1)/1-fia\44,64K) OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) e/ee-r-A K. I:=)411-1 Gc / e v cl) ()kr? 1),1-c c tu" 01 L7 "{(7-'irL r L L„,3 („1 '04-0 Sho r Py- ykL \r-k kiQui jN itiWIA Jo 4v 1•7‘ / GA)51t-0414,/ -7,75c6 13P11.. `:31'--() ate-, C/ 7 ? L, S f S ho,fe Or. O)r )A Holf2i4tet-13 Sjio ic 0-, 7 36 7 / PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE L/,'" kc-1,,,ti PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) .” V`feS`b 4A0re.. Dr. PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 71 2- ( U') t \c-,r*- 7 1 7 C k! 5 Ii &u' OK. •iR This petition was circulated by: 6,;--T-A-V p/t-t-t OWNER'S NAME (PR NTED) rivm.„ :1161titu:c M Ay-4 ''-71101/141.-C • PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 11/14/22, 1:20 PM 70th ST TRAFFIC Signature sheet.jpg PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE /// OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) A (1) \L_Q PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) OQC\ (1 , - / _2 I Lic Iz u 10 ' 1/2- S1/UH c / )j-4 -/ 41 17 111'14' -/-I v- CtA 67 ete-)) e V d 0 3 u C/u, Pc/ / 6g 3(.2 6-efm, Pd ,LB3 2 Q &-.1 • A 1/1/t/C, trill 7 - .J 2 r r V\V‘JCA:`„_.) 14 IVA, fr) Y.? j )0(4 , I I 7;1 t(' r( ) \r) • :1---A) C,JJ9 (Z' L'7 u r_; 5 This petition was circulated by: 44 NAME 00v woock4ie Ave S (/3) Jo 7q6'7 7q(7 ADDRESS PHONE 0 5- c( ) e (.)( rc _doc The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGqRQFJKhfgvKCTpb,JdhFVFTTss?projector=1&messagePartlid=0.1 1/1 /Q to(77 5- (2y 'I ic2 /'p7(YVi9P.,.sP 9)9 r)511) •h-( 77-% 417 g/;'d cjg 9 -gPV Vc/ --dje Jr -247) /772 U4 g0:1;2 q S -6" 0/ 9 ,-77 ,v- 99•-V v17 _zt ,9f51 /)z f 74.97,7.4' 011 %,%. IH(H$ H 4.11)H.I S ry-> 2)? v920 ± 5lT9 AffP Aii--Pfoied/) v.,/ cid/ v„-v( (roc? ri) INAM) Tr „ 1,7 /6V /74 CIX/1400Zy s.9 r-oz-7 ,?A 72 ?;.'"" rn"'111(1V tri, 7/! In 11% \ ‘Nt) lin LIOH.1 /i/2// /a) 2y -d-d-w}zi (566 6-64.kct,iILL /en Ov, N'AME t;l0 stii EMVV <EE - 46 (11 ) N-4 1AL-7(1-1 f/,s2-t-rwtA 2z}) 4-wii'7911/Vi Qt 5--b 6 E f 5:4! /Hoek"... ak___Lt, r fl fr--; Ae-ar0-Vi_tx r4.o. 1)61(6' . _ (ebcoc,Vc' Qw Nj S (fz) ttleP4 4+ 50 I Pi I *1 It• •$lki% Ali 1{1. 6/41L trA-T<P - 7 (e, ./ (•C. //e_-__ 5- c,(// .1P4-71,/e-ee, iiitt4L-te WI (a- 972rere-A--- J Ho o 1 2 01 0 1—) )C., rock (,) OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) 1 4 2 y L. vAi 4 'UPS. ref 11N-L— te4-e&o-h6L-6.11._)Ph\)1 11'5 Co lei hi'rsch etrYt-/Yulai W X.2.-4--Nt/vtA-81--tk _,0 he\ l C, 11 Mck. Vl ri e kcLiti 1-\ PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINT D) /1 4)7 aoS/ //Z UAL, et_i /66,--71/02 Rob&d- rcCf) (1 5 r),-, i\) ex vi Are 4(0.5 i)py v\rkDi J,7 I( PF/ 94,11.0A4 /7 0 tition was circulated by: &‘2 61 -7 ;5W- 7,--)7 ADDRESS 7-f---12/ f PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this .form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information, You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 NAME PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 6.2) verA. %IV P 4 '? i Zo k_c-W2 fravakire- 3 -77eveo 60'1 303 a SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME R B Condi PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 65 (0C Rivao Aye 11 12,11 ir f'-'71T/ el eitA -•-•W 40 9 (4 f 1 ic;\ -41-0)0- 0-1 F Acc,rc-Kc-,04 3t_ec__Ixc_„,k1, 8,7/ 4 el/ v--e i-2 /./.5 I-1 k-2 ,17e.c /4m.y /00 'Pdtio6--- This petition w trculated by: ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form, 'Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information, You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 1/ rt /co // I 4'21( /d7 tt 1(010tJ 4;r ft rAirMite 4TY ViTt-trA,T IM\se.;AV:"e Ilelltkb Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 28, 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 28, 2023. INTRODUCTION: The Transportation Commission reviewed the report at their March 16 regular meeting; comments are included in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 28, 2023 April 4, 2023 Mayor and City Council Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of February 28, 2023 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 28. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Engineer, Streets Public Service Worker, Transportation Planner, Public Works Director and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. The Police Sergeant was not able to attend but was informed of the decisions and had no objections to the recommendations On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the April 4 regular meeting. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Review on-street parking restrictions along Market St Staff recommends designating No Parking for all of Market St. Description Market St permanent parking restriction signs removed in 2022 as they were not the City standard. Reinstating restriction is necessary with current street layout. ADT 4,370 (2021) 85% Speed N/A Crashes One in last ten years, within the north parking (2018) Sight Lines Sight lines impacted for vehicles existing from center ramp when delivery vehicles are parked on Market. Previous Requests Update EB lane designation to add thru/right option, Crosswalk concerns over Halifax Ave north of 50th St Policy Guideline Street layout is not conducive to on-street parking. Unique Circumstances Issue includes business loading/unloading in front of Spalon Montage and south of woonerf on Halifax Ave. Market St and Halifax Ave STAFF REPORT Page 2 A2. Request for Added Lane Sign entering northbound Valley View Rd from westbound W 66th St Staff recommends installing an Added Lane Sign. A3. Prevent unsafe crossings over Interlachen Blvd at Brookside Ave Staff recommends removing the pedestrian ramp at southeast corner of the intersection to discourage pedestrian crossings. Description Requestor is concerned drivers wrongfully expect lane to end and yield/brake inappropriately. ADT NB Valley View Rd: 4,700 (2021) WB-NB W 66th St: 2,460 (2022) 85% Speed 36.5 mph (2008) Posted speed limit: 30 mph Crashes One in last ten years (2015) Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Street Width Third lane added north of W 66th Sight Lines Adequate Previous Requests N/A Policy Guideline MnMUTCD: Added Lane Sign (W4-3 or W4-6) should be installed in advance of a point where two roadways converge and merging movements are not required. When possible, place where visible by both roadways. Unique Circumstances NB Valley View Rd approaches Highway 62 WB entrance ramp and EB exit ramp. Description Concerns include vehicle speeds and lack of gaps along Interlachen ADT 11,100 (2020) 85% Speed 33.4 mph (2016) Posted speed limit: 30 mph Crashes Four crashes in last ten years Ped and Bike Crosses 21 pedestrians, 34 cyclists; Peak hour of 8 at 3:15-4:15 pm Sight Lines Inadequate- eastbound Interlachen traffic unable to see queued pedestrians on south side of Interlachen. Previous Requests None Policy Guideline Pedestrian Crossing Policy: Minimum pedestrian volume is 20 pedestrians per hour. Observed volume does not meet minimum threshold. Unique Circumstances Marked crosswalk is present 350’ south at Interlachen Blvd and Vernon Ave, pedestrian facilities are present on both sides of Interlachen Blvd between Brookside and Vernon Aves. Transportation Commission Recommended further review for solutions other than crosswalk. Map from Bill Neuendorf requesting delivery areas within Market St and Halifax Ave Red Arrows represent westbound traffic on W 66th entering northbound Valley View Rd Interlachen Blvd at Brookside Ave Added Lane Sign, W4-6 (MnMUTCD) STAFF REPORT Page 3 Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request for lane striping or signage at Point of France on W 66th St Staff recommends no changes. B2. Safety concerns near Avail Academy in Morningside neighborhood Staff recommends increased police enforcement to address driver behavior. Description Residents concerned that WB vehicles on 66th St use entire right lane to enter NB Valley View Rd, impacting Point of France drivers exiting driveway. AADT WB 66th St: 6,600 (2022), 2,450 turning right onto NB Valley View Rd 1,070 entered right lane before PoF driveway 134 entered and 154 exited PoF driveway. 15 cases of PoF exiting vehicles waiting for WB vehicles in right lane 85% Speed N/A Crashes None reported in last 10 years. Sight Lines Adequate Previous Requests None Policy Guideline N/A Unique Circumstances W 66th St was overlayed in 2020 Description Noted issues include speeding, running stop sign at Grimes Ave and Inglewood Ave, driving past school bus with stop arm extended, distracted driving, parking and blocking driveways on Grimes Ave. ADT 800 (2022) 85% Speed 25.5 mph (2022) Posted speed limit: 25 mph Crashes None reported in past 10 years Street widths 29’ face-to-face of curb Sight Lines Adequate Previous Requests No Policy Guideline N/A Unique Circumstances Neighborhood reconstruction project in 2023 will include reduced street width, new sidewalks on Grimes and Inglewood Aves. W 66th St between France Ave and Valley View Rd Grimes Ave and Inglewood Ave STAFF REPORT Page 4 Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study C1. Review crosswalk markings over Halifax Ave, north of W 50th St Staff recommends further study to evaluate potential signage locations, including on the sides of adjacent buildings. C2. Request for school speed zone for International Spanish Language Academy (5350 W 78th St) Staff recommends further study to determine if a school speed zone is warranted.* *Statement of potential conflict of interest: The Transportation Planner has a relative who attends ISLA. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A request was submitted regarding a traffic signal not operating properly at W 78th St and Bush Lake Rd. Hennepin County staff was notified of this request as in signal is operated by the County. D2. A resident requested speed enforcement on France Ave between Highway 62 and W 51st St. Police added enforcement to the area immediately following the request. D3. Complaints were received about a full street closure without proper signage during construction at 6500 Barrie Rd. Public Works contacted the project manager regarding the City’s street closure policy. Description Crosswalk markings are present, but roadside signs have been removed due to damage. ADT 4,370 (2021) 85% Speed N/A Crashes One in last ten years (2020) Ped and Bike Crosses 87 total crosses; Peak hour of 19 at 11:45-12:45 Sight Lines Adequate Previous Requests Complaints regarding traffic management at 50th St and Halifax Ave Policy Guideline Pedestrian Crossing Policy: Minimum pedestrian volume is 20 pedestrians per hour. Observed volume is one less than warrant. Crosswalk is <300’ from marked crossing at 50th St. Policy recommends directing pedestrians to nearest marked crossing. Unique Circumstances 50th & France is an area of high pedestrian activity. There is limited space to install roadside signs where they are unlikely to be struck by vehicles. Description Parent noticed no school speed zone is posted on Edina Industrial Blvd next to the school. ADT 8,860 (2022) 85% Speed 39.5 mph (2022) Posted speed limit: 30 mph Crashes Six crashes in last ten years. Street width 45’ to 72’ Sight Lines Adequate Previous Requests Concern that school traffic will impact rush hours; request was later withdrawn when no issues were observed. Policy Guideline Minnesota Statute §169.14 Subd. 5a: Local authorities may establish a school speed limit within a school zone of a public of nonpublic school upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation. Unique Circumstances ISLA moved onto this property in 2021. Halifax Ave crosswalk at woonerf entrance International Spanish Language Academy (ISLA) STAFF REPORT Page 5 D4. A resident submitted a concern of unsafe driver behavior on Valley Ln. Police were notified of the request for additional enforcement. Staff will further consider safety improvements as a street reconstruction project is anticipated in 2028. D5. A resident on Brookside Ave requested signage to direct delivery vehicles to the correct address. Staff determined this request was not related to traffic safety and recommends no action. D6. A resident reported faded pavement markings on Parklawn Ave. Public Works will review the markings and determine if replacement is warranted this summer. D7. A resident was concerned with the location of signage at the new roundabout of Eden Ave and Arcadia Ave. Staff reviewed and determined that signage is in appropriate locations. D8. A home for sale sign was impacting sight lines for traffic entering Valley View Rd from Mark Terrace Dr. The realtor was contacted to relocate the sign to improve sight lines. D9. A driver noted traffic signal issues traveling south on Halifax Ave at W 50th St. Staff clarified how the signal operates. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Todd Milburn, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-28: Accepting Donation of Automated External Defibrillators Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-28 accepting donation of Automated External Defibrillators (AED). INTRODUCTION: The Edina P olice Department received 22 new Automated External Defibrillators (AED) last month from the Minnesota First Responder AED project. This was a grant through the University of Minnesota whose goal was to provide AED to every first responder in the state to improve cardiac arrest survival. Each AED comes with an 8-year service plan which includes free replacement AED pads and batteries. Each squad car is now equipped with a new Stryker AED and all patrol officers have been trained in its use. The previous AEDs maintained by the police department are currently being reassigned to other city facilities and/or organizations in the City of Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2023-28: Accepting Donation of AED RESOLUTION NO. 2023-28 ACCEPTING DONATION OF AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS WHEREAS, through a grant from the University of Minnesota, the First Responder AED Project donated 22 Automated External Defibrillator (AED) units with an 8-year service plan and free replacement AED pads and batteries; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Edina City Council approves and accepts the donation of 22 AED units from the Minnesota First Responder AED Project. Dated: April 4, 2023 Attest: ___________________________ ___________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of ___________________, 20___. ____________________________ City Clerk Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Todd Milburn, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-29: Accepting Donation from the Edina Crime Prevention Fund for License Plate Readers Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-29 accepting donation from the Edina Crime Prevention Fund for license plate readers. INTRODUCTION: To help reduce and deter crime, the Edina Crime Prevention Fund is donating $20,000 toward this purchase of five stationary and two mobile license plate readers (LPR). T he City will contribute $23,500 toward the total purchase price of $43,500. LPR can be crucial in developing leads when crime occurs in areas where they are placed. LPR provide a direct line to police dispatch when a vehicle enters an area that has been flagged, stolen or involved in a serious crime. The City Council will approve the request for purchase at a future meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-29: Accepting Donation RESOLUTION NO. 2023-29 ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND FOR LICENSE PLATE READERS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 456.03 allows cities to accept grants or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the Edina Crime Prevention Fund would like to optimize efficiencies to curb crime by making a donation of $20,000 to contribute to the purchase of five stationary and two mobile license plate readers; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Edina City Council approve the donation of $20,000 for the purchase of five stationary and two mobile license plate readers. Dated: April 4, 2023 Attest: ___________________________ ___________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of ___________________, 20___. ____________________________ City Clerk Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Manager Item Activity: Subject:Heritage Preservation Commission Appointment Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Appoint Theresa Farrell-Strauss to the Heritage Preservation Commission appointment with a term limit of 3/1/25. INTRODUCTION: The Heritage Preservation Commission has recently had an unscheduled vacancy. When vacancies happen within the first six months following the start of new terms, the City fills the open seat with a City Council approved alternate selected during the 2023 onboarding session. Theresa has signified her interest in serving. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Todd Milburn, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proclamation declaring the week of April 9-15, 2023, National P ublic Safety Telecommunicator Week. INTRODUCTION: Each year in April we recognize the dedication and professionalism of our 911 Dispatchers during National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week. The City of Edina is very fortunate to have its own independent 911 Emergency Communications Center delivering exceptional service to the community. Our Communications Center receives and processes 911 and non-emergency calls for Edina Police and Fire, Richfield Police and Fire, as well as after-hours emergency calls for Public Works and other City resources. In 2022, our staff answered 110,457 incoming phone calls including 43,442 calls to 911. They dispatch these calls to our first responders and then maintain a constant watch over them providing an essential lifeline when things don’t go as planned in the field. Edina’s dispatchers are a critical component of our exceptional public safety services working around the clock, ready to handle whatever comes next. Let this be a time for us to thank and honor those who have dedicated themselves to serving our community in this essential role. ATTACHMENTS: Description Dispatch Proclamation PROCLAMATION National Public Safety Telecommunicator Week Sunday, April 9, 2023 – Saturday, April 15, 2023 WHEREAS, emergencies can occur at any time that require police, fire or emergency medical services; and WHEREAS, when an emergency occurs, the prompt response of police officers, firefighters and paramedics is critical to the protection of life and preservation or property; and WHEREAS, the safety of our police officers, firefighters and paramedics is dependent upon the quality and accuracy of information obtained from citizens who telephone or text the Edina Communications Center; and WHEREAS, Public Safety Telecommunicators are the first and most critical contact our citizens have with emergency services; and WHEREAS, Public Safety Telecommunicators are the single vital link for our police officers, firefighters and paramedics by monitoring their activities by radio, providing them information and ensuring their safety; and WHEREAS, Public Safety Telecommunicators of the Edina Communications Center have contributed substantially to the apprehension of the criminals, suppression of fires and treatment of patients; and WHEREAS, each Public Safety Telecommunicator has exhibited compassion, understanding and professionalism during the performance of their job in the past year; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims the week of April 9 through April 15, 2023 as National Public Safety Telecommunicator Week In the City of Edina, MN in honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep our city and citizens safe. Dated this 4th day of April 2023. _____________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for The Lynhall Edina, LLC, dba The Lynhall No. 3945 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon April 10 and continue action on the item to the April 18 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: The Lynhall No. 3945 is located at 3945 Market Street and is currently licensed for On-Sale Wine and On-Sale 3.2 percent malt liquor. The applicant has applied for On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. The On-Sale Intoxicating liquor license allows for the sale and service of all liquor types unlike their current licenses. Lynhall was also recently approved for a sidewalk café permit. Staff reviewed the application and find that it complies with code requirements. A background investigation was completed by the Police Department and is attached. Lynhall has completed the required employee alcohol awareness training. Staff recommends approval of the liquor licenses. To date, we have not received any feedback on Better Together. ATTACHMENTS: Description Background Check BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY Establishment: The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945 License: On-sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale __________________________________________________________________________ In March 2023, the Edina Police Department received a request relating to a City of Edina application for an on-sale intoxicating liquor and Sunday Sale license. The application was submitted by The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945. The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945 will operate from 3945 Market Street in Edina. The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945 is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945 is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945 and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina’s requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training. Owners/Partners/Members: The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945: Spaeth, Anne Greenwood, MN The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent, The Lynhall Edina, LLC, DBA The Lynhall No. 3945 from obtaining a liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. __________________________ Lt. Dan Conboy #183 Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2023-25: Establishing the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, April 10 and to continue action on the item to the April 18 City Council Meeting. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the future use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to support redevelopment of 5-acres of vacant land located along the France Avenue commercial corridor. The resolution would establish the TIF "District" and adopt the TIF Plan for spending new property taxes collected within the boundaries of the District. A private developer proposes to redevelop the site at 7200-7250 France Avenue with two new buildings and reconstruct the property in accordance with the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning and in a manner that delivers many benefits to the general public. T he public benefits would not be possible without the use of tax increment financing. The TIF Plan was prepared by the City’s financial advisors with review by the City’s special council for TIF redevelopment matters. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approved this TIF Plan on March 23, 2023. A public hearing will be held to collect additional input before the City Council makes a final decision. The TIF Plan is summarized in the attached staff report and presentation. Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2023-25. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report:Establishing the 72nd and France 2 TIF District Resolution 2023-25: Establishing the 72nd and France 2 TIF District TIF Plan Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Presentation April 4, 2023 Mayor and City Council Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2023-25: Establishing the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Information / Background: The City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority are considering entering into a contractual agreement with an affiliate of Edina-based Orion Investments to provide financial support using Tax Increment Financing (TIF) so that a wide array of public benefits can be delivered on property that is currently privately owned. A new TIF District is proposed to be established to enable public financing for these improvements. The redevelopment site is located at 7200-7250 France Avenue. The substandard office buildings have been demolished to remove hazardous conditions and to prepare the site for new construction. In February 2023, the site was rezoned as Planned Unit Development #16. This zoning allows an office building, a hotel or multifamily building and extensive site work to include new public realm spaces for circulation, gathering and landscaping. This project is anticipated to result in several new publicly accessible routes through the property that do not exist today. These new routes are designed to be consistent with the goals of the Greater Southdale Plan and are considered benefits to the general public. The construction of these routes are not included in the City’s regular budget or Capital Improvement Plan. The new public routes include: new north/south roadway for motor vehicles extending from Gallagher to 72nd – to enable drivers to access both properties without using France Ave. new north/south paved trail for bicyclists and pedestrians extending from Gallagher to 72nd that is separated from vehicle traffic new east/west sidewalk with boulevard along 72nd St reconstructed sidewalk with boulevard on Gallagher reconstructed sidewalk with boulevard along France Ave with Metro Transit bus stop new public plaza (Danila) with east/west sidewalk, landscaping and public art sculptures STAFF REPORT Page 2 two new public gathering spaces adjacent to the western landscaped area that serves as a shared stormwater basin new public gathering spaces along France Ave with seating, landscaping and streetscaping elements While the public will have access to these improvements, the responsibility to maintain and repair these areas rests with the developer and/or future property owner. Other than typical snow removal from the sidewalk along France Avenue, the City’s workload and budget will not be impacted by the future maintenance needs of these improvements. The project is also anticipated to deliver additional benefits that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Sustainable Building Policy and TIF Policy including: new job opportunities new shared stormwater basin upgraded energy efficiency of both buildings to LEED Silver or equivalent efforts to provide additional employment and business opportunities for groups of people that have traditionally been underrepresented in the construction field new lodging tax by the future hotel new sales tax revenue by the future retail operations on the site This TIF Plan also would allow for a future pedestrian underpass or pedestrian bridge to allow convenient access across France Avenue to Centennial Lakes and the Promenade trail. While details of that type of improvement have not been finalized, this TIF Plan would allow the public easement areas to be modified in the future to allow this additional public benefit. Staff has met with the developer to understand the financial conditions that warrant consideration of public financing to deliver these benefits. Staff has also engaged legal and financial advisors at Ehlers Associates and Dorsey & Whitney to review the financial pro forma and provide input on the potential use of TIF for this project. Ehlers has scrutinized the financial pro forma and determined that the financial gap is approximately $7.5 million. Ehlers also confirmed that “but for” the use of TIF, this project will be unable to secure private financing. In February 2023, the HRA generally agreed with the general business terms proposed for the use of TIF on this site and authorized staff to prepare documentation for full consideration of a new TIF District. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is one of the financial tools available to the City to encourage new investment in a manner that enhances the property tax base and achieves other community goals. TIF uses new property taxes (aka incremental taxes) that are generated by a new project to pay for some of the costs associated with the new project. The existing tax base continues to be distributed to the school, city, county and other taxing agencies. The use of TIF is governed by Minnesota Statutes that have evolved over several decades. These laws provide a number of protections to ensure that financial incentives are not over-used or mis-used. The City STAFF REPORT Page 3 of Edina has historically used TIF to a lesser extent than its peers. The City’s TIF Policy limits financial risk to the City and strives to maximize public benefits when TIF is used. In this case, staff recommends that the old “Housing” TIF District be terminated and replaced with a new “Redevelopment” TIF District so that the project can be financed and constructed. This recommendation is based on the following: District is located within the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Site qualifies as a new 25-year Redevelopment TIF District Boundaries include parcels at 7200-7250 France Avenue and adjacent streets Construction of PUD #16 can deliver many public benefits that would not otherwise be achieved as described earlier “But for” the use of TIF, this project would not be constructed and the public benefits would not be delivered Developer bears all financial risk associated with this project City does not incur maintenance or repair obligations on the new roadways and sidewalk beyond the current responsibilities established by City policy The site has been investigated by Stantec to ensure it qualifies per the Minnesota TIF regulations. Ehlers Associates, the City’s public finance advisor has prepared a Tax Increment Financing Plan to establish the parameters of the new TIF District. This Plan has been reviewed by the City’s special counsel for redevelopment matters – Dorsey & Whitney to ensure compliance with State Law. Draft copies of this TIF Plan have been distributed to affected taxing agencies, including the Edina School District and Hennepin County in accordance with the process identified in State Law. As of the writing of this staff report, no concerns have been expressed by these taxing agencies regarding the creation of the 72nd and France 2 TIF District. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approved this TIF Plan on March 23, 2023. The HRA approval was one of several steps in the consideration of a new TIF District. The TIF Plan was also presented to the Edina Planning Commission on March 29, 2023. Public input has been collected using the City’s typical channels: email, US postal service, voicemail and the Better Together Edina website. The Public Hearing will allow for addition public input before a final decision is made. Final action on the TIF District is anticipated to occur on April 18, 2023. Please note that this Resolution only consents to the establishment of the new TIF District, including boundaries, scope, term and revenue collection. The TIF Redevelopment Agreement with the developer will be considered in a separate action scheduled for a future meeting. While staff supports Resolution 2023-25, staff recommends that action be continued until April 18, 2023 after the public has additional opportunity to provide input. CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2023-25 ESTABLISHING THE 72nd AND FRANCE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefore. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City approve and the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") and a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the establishment of the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District") therein (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA and City will have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the TIF District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property within the TIF District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the HRA on March 23, 2023, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the ''Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. 1.05. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area, but is, however, modifying the Redevelopment Plan to include activities related to the TIF District. Resolution 2023-25 Page 2 Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification. 2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the TIF District. 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the TIF District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. 3.03. The Council finds that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment or development of the TIF District by private enterprise. 3.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.05. The HRA elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the TIF District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the TIF District. Section 4. Public Purpose. 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make the development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a property owner are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans. 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. Resolution 2023-25 Page 3 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the HRA is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the TIF District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The HRA Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: April 18, 2023 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor (Seal) Resolution 2023-25 Page 4 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2023-25 The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, with plans for demolition and clearance of substandard buildings for the private redevelopment of underutilized property at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. As identified by HRA Resolution 2022-08, parcels consisting of at least 70% of the area of the District were found to be occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, were structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the District. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation, site improvement, and construction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements. The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s advisors reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to the anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the overall redevelopment costs for this site. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the costs of site preparation, Resolution 2023-25 Page 5 demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvement costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in taxable market value will be $87,556,380. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $13,401,752. d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a taxable market value increase greater than $74,154,628 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on March 29, 2023 and approved Resolution PC-B-23-04 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the redevelopment of substandard and underutilized property, construction of the new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment within the City and the State of Minnesota, an increase in tax base, and add a high-quality development to the City. Resolution 2023-25 Page 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of April 18, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2023. _______________________________ City Clerk Public Hearing Date: April 4, 2023 Anticipated Adoption Date: April 18, 2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Modification to the Redevelopment Plan Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area & Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Establishment of 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (a redevelopment district) BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN 1 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 4 FOREWORD 4 STATUTORY AUTHORITY 4 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 4 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 5 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED 5 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION 6 DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT 6 ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 7 SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED 8 USES OF FUNDS 9 FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION 10 ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS 11 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 13 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION 14 Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications Appendix D: Redevelopment Qualifications for the District Appendix E: Project Description Appendix F: Permit Research DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. This modification is a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. Generally, the substantive changes include the establishment of the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City’s development objects as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council has created, established and designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047. The original and amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan documents designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as a redevelopment project and also a tax increment financing plan for tax increment districts created prior to 1988. The Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District was created in 1988 pursuant to Tax Increment Financing Plan 88-1, which was subsequently renamed the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and referred to by Hennepin County as District #1203 and #1249. For purposes of clarification, this modification will refer to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.002. The following municipal action has been taken with regard to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan: September 29, 1977: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the “HRA”) approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan. October 5, 1981: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan was amended to identify project costs and bonded indebtedness incurred to finance those costs. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2 May 6, 1985: The HRA and the City approved an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan which establishes an interest reduction program and enlarges the project area to include the “1985 Project Area.” August 19, 1985: The HRA and the City approved the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan to enlarge the 1985 Project Area and authorize the issuance of additional bonds to acquire land within the enlarged 1985 Project Area. 1987: The HRA and City approved the 1987 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to enlarge the project area to include the 1987 Project Area. 1988: The HRA and City approved the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide an Interest Reduction Program in the amount of $2,500,000 to assist in the financing and construction of housing units and authorize the HRA and City to incur additional bonded indebtedness. February 21, 2012: The HRA and City expand the Southeast Edina Project Area. April 17, 2012: The HRA and City establish the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. February 18, 2014: The HRA and City establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. March 2, 2016: The HRA and City establish the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District. April 5, 2016: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District and establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District. June 20, 2017: The HRA and City establish the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. October 16, 2018: The HRA and City establish the 44th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the TIF Budget and enable special legislative pooling authority for affordable housing. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City also establish the West 76th Street Tax Increment Financing District. March 19, 2019: The HRA and City establish the 72nd and France Tax Increment Financing District. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 3 December 17, 2019: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to designate property to be acquired and establish the Amundson Avenue Tax Increment Financing District. August 4, 2021: The HRA and City establish the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District. September 9, 2021: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the estimated project costs expected to be paid or financed with tax increment from the Southdale 2 TIF District, to include affordable housing project costs. October 19, 2021: The HRA and City establish the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. March 22, 2022: The HRA and City establish the 70th and France Renewal and Renovation Tax Increment Financing District. (As Modified April 18, 2023) April 18, 2023: The HRA and City establish the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, is recommended. It is available from the HRA Executive Director at the City of Edina. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 4 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District FOREWORD The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the Establishment of the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 - 469.047, inclusive, as amended (the “HRA Act”), and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The District currently consists of two (2) parcels of land inclusive of adjacent street and internal rights-of-way and intersections depicted within the map contained in Appendix A. The District is being created to facilitate the private redevelopment of two vacant and obsolete commercial buildings into a new mixed-use development with supporting parking and public infrastructure improvements as more fully described in Appendix E. The HRA anticipates entering into an agreement with 7250 France Group, LLC or an affiliate entity as the developer. Development is anticipated to begin in 2023 and is anticipated to be constructed in two phases with completion by 2027. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan. The activities contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 5 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the HRA or City is authorized to undertake the following activities in the District: 1.Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED The District encompasses all property identified by the parcels listed below inclusive of adjacent rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections. Parcel number Address Owner 31-028-24-14-0001 7200 France Ave S France Property Partners Llc 31-028-24-14-0015 7250 France Ave S 7250 France Group Llc Please also see the map in Appendix A for further information on the location of the District. The HRA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street or other rights of way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the HRA or City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, bridge, tunnel, underpass and other facilities; and carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The HRA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 6 Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with the TIF Act, find that the District, to be established, is a redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1). In meeting the statutory criteria, the HRA and City rely on the following facts and findings: $ The District consists of two (2) parcels. $ An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70% of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. $ An inspection of the buildings located within the District finds that more than 50% of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix D). Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of 26 years of tax increment). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2026, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2051, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 7 ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2022 for taxes payable 2023. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2026) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the District; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City. The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2023, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2023. The final rates for 2023 were not available at the time the District was established. The estimated ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100% of the available increase in tax capacity be used for repayment of the obligations of the HRA or City and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2026. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the District is completed. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 8 Estimated Project Tax Capacity (PTC) upon completion 2,048,974 Less: Estimated Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) 217,506 Less: Fiscal Disparities Contribution 367,062 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) 1,464,406 Original Local Tax Rate 98.9070% Pay 2023 Prelim. Estimated Annual Tax Increment $1,448,400 Percent Retained by the HRA 100% Project Tax Capacity Note: Estimated PTC includes a 1.0% inflation factor for the duration of the District and is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 26. The tax capacity of the District in year one is estimated to be $1,127,020. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City has reviewed the area to be included in the District and found that some building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the Plan by the City. The permits were issued for demolition of the buildings. Although the total estimated valuation of the permits is $669,694, the permitted activity is not expected to increase the original net tax capacity. Please see Appendix F for the building permits that were issued. SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES Tax Increment (26 years of collection) 32,346,151$ Interest 1,617,307 TOTAL 33,963,458$ DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 9 The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by one or more pay- as-you-go notes. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal modification to this TIF Plan. This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $16,870,078. This figure represents the maximum amount supportable by the anticipated tax increment cashflow at an assumed 6.50% interest rate. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. USES OF FUNDS Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate the private redevelopment of two vacant and substandard commercial properties into a new mixed-use commercial and/or residential development with supporting parking and public infrastructure improvements. The HRA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described herein. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. These estimates establish the maximum amount permitted to be expended, but the HRA and City is not obligated to expend the full amount. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 10 USES Land/Building Acquisition 1,000,000$ Site Improvements/Preparation 5,000,000 Affordable Housing*3,500,000 Utilities 1,500,000 Other Qualifying Improvements**3,370,078 Administrative Costs 2,500,000 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL 16,870,078$ Interest 17,093,380 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL 33,963,458$ * Affordable Housing may not occur if the site plan for Phase 2 of the project designates a hotel use. However, other affordable housing could be funded through future pooling if sufficient increment is available. ** Includes costs of streets, roads, sidewalks, bridge, tunnel, underpass or similar improvements available for public use. The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section. Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to the TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25% of the tax increment paid by property within the District will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d), the HRA and City may elect to increase by up to ten percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the District. The HRA and City intend to pool tax increment paid by property within the District to be used to assist housing that meets the requirements contained in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d). FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the HRA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities contribution of commercial-industrial net tax capacity from the District. The HRA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b (inside the DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 11 District). ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions described herein assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA or City has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: Entity Preliminary 2022/ Pay 2023 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) upon completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 2,486,081,130 1,464,406 0.0589% City of Edina 172,325,185 1,464,406 0.8498% ISD 273 (Edina Public Schools)139,227,123 1,464,406 1.0518% Impact on Tax Base if "But/For" Not Met Entity Preliminary Pay 2023 Extension Rate Percent of Total Rate CTC Potential Annual Taxes Hennepin County 34.8050% 35.19% 1,464,406 $ 509,687 City of Edina 28.1720% 28.48% 1,464,406 412,553 ISD 273 (Edina Public Schools)28.0670% 28.38% 1,464,406 411,015 Other 7.8630%7.95% 1,464,406 115,146 98.9070% 100.00% $1,448,400 Impact on Tax Rates if "But/For" Not Met The estimates listed above display the estimated CTC after construction and the District is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the Preliminary Pay 2023 rate as obtained from Hennepin County. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Preliminary Pay 2023 figures provided by Hennepin County. The District will be certified under the Final Pay 2023 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the District is DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 12 $32,346,151; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. An impact of the District on police protection is expected as it is with any new development on a vacant site. New developments add an increase in traffic and additional overall demands to the call load. The addition of a new office building to the Southdale area is estimated to increase police call volume by 18- 36 calls per year. The addition of a new multifamily building likely brings an additional 50 calls per year. Alternatively, a new hotel may bring up to 120 calls depending on the type of hotel constructed. The City does not expect that the proposed redevelopment, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The new development is estimated to add some fraction amount of operating costs estimated at $45,000 per year, but this amount will be partially offset by the removal of the existing buildings which has been a hazardous environment for an extended period of time and which has required intervention by the police on multiple occasions. The probable impact of the District on Fire/EMS services is not expected to be significant. New, fully sprinklered, non-age restricted apartment or mixed-use commercial office buildings are expected to generate approximately 21 to 28 calls annually and be of superior construction that is compliant with the latest building codes and have superior fire protection systems. Prior to redevelopment, the buildings being eliminated by the new development have public safety concerns that include: several unprotected old buildings that were non-sprinklered and had standpipes only. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate additional staffing or new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The redevelopment is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements external to the area and the redevelopment will provide most of the necessitated road and utility infrastructure improvements as part of the private development costs. The redevelopment also includes shared stormwater retention basin to serve the site as well as adjacent residential properties. The city’s current infrastructure for sanitary sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development, but the City anticipates the addition of a looped watermain paid from the City’s water utility fund will benefit the DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 13 area. Based on the redevelopment plans, there are no additional City costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The redevelopment is expected to contribute an estimated $288,936 to $782,726 in Metropolitan Council sanitary sewer (SAC) and city sanitary sewer and water fees. The probable impact of any District general obligation debt issuance on the City’s ability to issue debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. As presently proposed, it is not anticipated that there will be any general obligation debt issued in relation to this redevelopment. Any such issuance, if considered, would not be expected to require the City’s general revenue support and would not apply to the City's debt limit. (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $9,178,920. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $31,346,151 by the school district’s percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate, or 28.38%; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $11,382,488 The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $32,346,151 by the county’s percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate, or 35.19%; (5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. At this time, no requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed redevelopment for the District have been received. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 14 Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 this TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. (i) In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon (1) written representation made by the Developer to such effects, (2) review of the Developer’s anticipated proforma; and (3) City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site within the District, which is further outlined in the City Council resolution approving the establishment of the District and Appendix C. (ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market value both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax increments has been performed. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix B and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed redevelopment (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the District and the use of tax increments. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Administration of the District will be handled by the HRA Executive Director and Economic Development Manager. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñTRACY AVEVERN ON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter City Hall Southview Jr High NormandaleElementary Concord School Cornelia School Southdale Library FireStation Public Works & Park Maintenance Creek Valley School FireStation Valley ViewJr High Edina High School Countryside School Highland School PublicLibrary M innehahaCree kNineMileCree k Nine MileCreek §¨¦494 RICHFIELD MINNEAPOLIS UV100 UV100 UV62 £¤169 §¨¦494 72nd & France 2 Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV E RN O N AV E CAHILL RD66TH ST W INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44 T H ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W £¤169 UV62 February 2023 ±72nd & France 2 TIF District Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 0 2,100 FeetDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 FRANCE AVE72ND ST W GALLAGHER DR 3102824140001 3102824140015LYNMAR LN±72nd and France 2 TIF District 0 100 FeetDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 72nd and France 2 RedevelopmentCity of Edina, MN Phase I: Multi-tenant office building Phase II: 150-unit Hotel or Multifamily building ASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType:RedevelopmentDistrict Name/Number:TBDCounty District #:TBDExempt Class Rate (Exempt)0.00%First Year Construction or Inflation on Value2024Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)Existing District - Specify No. Years RemainingFirst $150,0001.50%Inflation Rate - Every Year:1.00%Over $150,0002.00%Interest Rate:6.50%Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I)2.00%Present Value Date:1-Aug-24Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental)1.25%First Period Ending1-Feb-25Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental)Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2023First $100,000 0.75%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2026 Over $100,000 0.25%Years of Tax Increment 26 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res. 1 Unit)Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment2051First $500,0001.00%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Over $500,0001.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residential Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio34.7030% Pay 2023 Prelim.First $500,0001.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate133.6670% Pay 2023 Prelim.Over $500,0001.25%Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 98.907% Pay 2023 Prelim.Agricultural Non-Homestead1.00%Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.)98.907% Pay 2023 Prelim.State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes)34.0000% Pay 2023 Prelim.Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)0.22160% Pay 2023 Prelim.Building Total PercentageTax Year Property CurrentClassAfterLandMarket Market Of Value Used OriginalOriginalTaxOriginalAfterConversionPIDOwner AddressMarket Value ValueValue for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.131-028-24-14-00017200 France Ave S6,668,300 1,000 6,669,300100% 6,669,300 Pay 2023 C/I Pref.132,636 C/I Pref.132,636 II231-028-24-14-00157250 France Ave S4,280,000 1,000 4,281,000100% 4,281,000 Pay 2023 C/I Pref.84,870 C/I Pref.84,870 I10,948,300 2,000 10,950,30010,950,300 217,506217,506Note:1. Base values are for pay 2023 based upon review of County website on February 28,2023.2. Located in SD # 273 and WS # 1.Area/ PhaseTax Rates BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity)DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 72nd and France 2 RedevelopmentCity of Edina, MN Phase I: Multi-tenant office building Phase II: 150-unit Hotel or Multifamily building Estimated Taxable Total Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft./Unit Per Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./UnitsValueClass Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit 2024202520262027PayableIOffice360360 138,213 49,756,680 C/I Pref. 994,3847 100%100%100%100%2026IIApartments 325,000325,000 150 48,750,000 Rental609,3754,063 22%100%100%100%2027TOTAL98,506,680 1,603,759 Subtotal Residential150 48,750,000 609,375 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.138,213 49,756,680 994,384 Note:1. Market values are based upon preliminary estimates from the assessor's office and comparable properties in the area.Total Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide MarketTax Disparities Tax Property Disparities PropertyValueTotalTaxes PerNew Use Capacity Tax Capacity CapacityTaxesTaxesTaxesTaxesTaxes Sq. Ft./UnitOffice994,384 345,081649,303642,206 461,259 337,325110,261 1,551,05111.22Apartments 609,3750609,375602,71500108,030710,745 4,738.30TOTAL1,603,759345,0811,258,6781,244,920461,259337,325218,2912,261,796Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary significantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.Total Property Taxes 2,261,796Current Market Value - Est. 10,950,300less State-wide Taxes (337,325)New Market Value - Est. 98,506,680less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (461,259) Difference 87,556,380less Market Value Taxes (218,291)Present Value of Tax Increment 13,401,752less Base Value Taxes (140,473) Difference 74,154,628Annual Gross TIF 1,104,448Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than:74,154,628 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF?MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR ANALYSISTAX CALCULATIONSPROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity)DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 72nd and France 2 RedevelopmentCity of Edina, MN Phase I: Multi-tenant office building TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOWProject Original Fiscal CapturedLocal Annual Semi-Annual State Admin. Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% ofTaxTax Disparities TaxTax Gross Tax Gross Tax AuditoratNet Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC Capacity Capacity Incremental CapacityRate Increment Increment 0.36%10% IncrementValueYrs.Year Date- - - - 02/01/25- - - - 08/01/25- - - - 02/01/26100% 1,127,020 (217,506) (269,600) 639,914 98.907% 632,920 316,460 (1,139) (31,532) 283,788 249,709 0.5 2026 08/01/26100% 1,127,020 (217,506) (269,600) 639,914 98.907% 632,920 316,460 (1,139) (31,532) 283,788 491,558 1 2026 02/01/27100% 1,613,702 (217,506) (273,051) 1,123,146 98.907% 1,110,870 555,435 (2,000) (55,344) 498,092 902,679 1.5 2027 08/01/27100% 1,613,702 (217,506) (273,051) 1,123,146 98.907% 1,110,870 555,435 (2,000) (55,344) 498,092 1,300,858 2 2027 02/01/28100% 1,629,839 (217,506) (276,536) 1,135,797 98.907% 1,123,383 561,692 (2,022) (55,967) 503,703 1,690,848 2.5 2028 08/01/28100% 1,629,839 (217,506) (276,536) 1,135,797 98.907% 1,123,383 561,692 (2,022) (55,967) 503,703 2,068,563 3 2028 02/01/29100% 1,646,138 (217,506) (280,056) 1,148,576 98.907% 1,136,022 568,011 (2,045) (56,597) 509,369 2,438,504 3.5 2029 08/01/29100% 1,646,138 (217,506) (280,056) 1,148,576 98.907% 1,136,022 568,011 (2,045) (56,597) 509,369 2,796,800 4 2029 02/01/30100% 1,662,599 (217,506) (283,612) 1,161,482 98.907% 1,148,787 574,393 (2,068) (57,233) 515,093 3,147,717 4.5 2030 08/01/30100% 1,662,599 (217,506) (283,612) 1,161,482 98.907% 1,148,787 574,393 (2,068) (57,233) 515,093 3,487,589 5 2030 02/01/31100% 1,679,225 (217,506) (287,202) 1,174,517 98.907% 1,161,679 580,840 (2,091) (57,875) 520,874 3,820,457 5.5 2031 08/01/31100% 1,679,225 (217,506) (287,202) 1,174,517 98.907% 1,161,679 580,840 (2,091) (57,875) 520,874 4,142,847 6 2031 02/01/32100% 1,696,017 (217,506) (290,829) 1,187,682 98.907% 1,174,701 587,350 (2,114) (58,524) 526,712 4,458,589 6.5 2032 08/01/32100% 1,696,017 (217,506) (290,829) 1,187,682 98.907% 1,174,701 587,350 (2,114) (58,524) 526,712 4,764,392 7 2032 02/01/33100% 1,712,978 (217,506) (294,492) 1,200,979 98.907% 1,187,853 593,926 (2,138) (59,179) 532,609 5,063,886 7.5 2033 08/01/33100% 1,712,978 (217,506) (294,492) 1,200,979 98.907% 1,187,853 593,926 (2,138) (59,179) 532,609 5,353,953 8 2033 02/01/34100% 1,730,107 (217,506) (298,192) 1,214,409 98.907% 1,201,136 600,568 (2,162) (59,841) 538,565 5,638,030 8.5 2034 08/01/34100% 1,730,107 (217,506) (298,192) 1,214,409 98.907% 1,201,136 600,568 (2,162) (59,841) 538,565 5,913,166 9 2034 02/01/35100% 1,747,409 (217,506) (301,929) 1,227,974 98.907% 1,214,552 607,276 (2,186) (60,509) 544,581 6,182,618 9.5 2035 08/01/35100% 1,747,409 (217,506) (301,929) 1,227,974 98.907% 1,214,552 607,276 (2,186) (60,509) 544,581 6,443,588 10 2035 02/01/36100% 1,764,883 (217,506) (305,703) 1,241,674 98.907% 1,228,102 614,051 (2,211) (61,184) 550,656 6,699,164 10.5 2036 08/01/36100% 1,764,883 (217,506) (305,703) 1,241,674 98.907% 1,228,102 614,051 (2,211) (61,184) 550,656 6,946,694 11 2036 02/01/37100% 1,782,531 (217,506) (309,515) 1,255,511 98.907% 1,241,788 620,894 (2,235) (61,866) 556,793 7,189,105 11.5 2037 08/01/37100% 1,782,531 (217,506) (309,515) 1,255,511 98.907% 1,241,788 620,894 (2,235) (61,866) 556,793 7,423,886 12 2037 02/01/38100% 1,800,357 (217,506) (313,365) 1,269,486 98.907% 1,255,611 627,805 (2,260) (62,555) 562,991 7,653,807 12.5 2038 08/01/38100% 1,800,357 (217,506) (313,365) 1,269,486 98.907% 1,255,611 627,805 (2,260) (62,555) 562,991 7,876,491 13 2038 02/01/39100% 1,818,360 (217,506) (317,253) 1,283,601 98.907% 1,269,571 634,786 (2,285) (63,250) 569,250 8,094,564 13.5 2039 08/01/39100% 1,818,360 (217,506) (317,253) 1,283,601 98.907% 1,269,571 634,786 (2,285) (63,250) 569,250 8,305,773 14 2039 02/01/40100% 1,836,544 (217,506) (321,181) 1,297,857 98.907% 1,283,672 641,836 (2,311) (63,953) 575,573 8,512,605 14.5 2040 08/01/40100% 1,836,544 (217,506) (321,181) 1,297,857 98.907% 1,283,672 641,836 (2,311) (63,953) 575,573 8,712,927 15 2040 02/01/41100% 1,854,909 (217,506) (325,147) 1,312,256 98.907% 1,297,913 648,957 (2,336) (64,662) 581,958 8,909,096 15.5 2041 08/01/41100% 1,854,909 (217,506) (325,147) 1,312,256 98.907% 1,297,913 648,957 (2,336) (64,662) 581,958 9,099,090 16 2041 02/01/42100% 1,873,458 (217,506) (329,153) 1,326,799 98.907% 1,312,297 656,149 (2,362) (65,379) 588,408 9,285,142 16.5 2042 08/01/42100% 1,873,458 (217,506) (329,153) 1,326,799 98.907% 1,312,297 656,149 (2,362) (65,379) 588,408 9,465,339 17 2042 02/01/43100% 1,892,193 (217,506) (333,200) 1,341,487 98.907% 1,326,825 663,412 (2,388) (66,102) 594,922 9,641,795 17.5 2043 08/01/43100% 1,892,193 (217,506) (333,200) 1,341,487 98.907% 1,326,825 663,412 (2,388) (66,102) 594,922 9,812,697 18 2043 02/01/44100% 1,911,115 (217,506) (337,287) 1,356,322 98.907% 1,341,498 670,749 (2,415) (66,833) 601,501 9,980,050 18.5 2044 08/01/44100% 1,911,115 (217,506) (337,287) 1,356,322 98.907% 1,341,498 670,749 (2,415) (66,833) 601,501 10,142,136 19 2044 02/01/45100% 1,930,226 (217,506) (341,414) 1,371,306 98.907% 1,356,317 678,159 (2,441) (67,572) 608,146 10,300,853 19.5 2045 08/01/45100% 1,930,226 (217,506) (341,414) 1,371,306 98.907% 1,356,317 678,159 (2,441) (67,572) 608,146 10,454,575 20 2045 02/01/46100% 1,949,528 (217,506) (345,583) 1,386,439 98.907% 1,371,285 685,643 (2,468) (68,317) 614,857 10,605,101 20.5 2046 08/01/46100% 1,949,528 (217,506) (345,583) 1,386,439 98.907% 1,371,285 685,643 (2,468) (68,317) 614,857 10,750,889 21 2046 02/01/47100% 1,969,024 (217,506) (349,794) 1,401,724 98.907% 1,386,403 693,201 (2,496) (69,071) 621,635 10,893,644 21.5 2047 08/01/47100% 1,969,024 (217,506) (349,794) 1,401,724 98.907% 1,386,403 693,201 (2,496) (69,071) 621,635 11,031,906 22 2047 02/01/48100% 1,988,714 (217,506) (354,047) 1,417,161 98.907% 1,401,672 700,836 (2,523) (69,831) 628,482 11,167,291 22.5 2048 08/01/48100% 1,988,714 (217,506) (354,047) 1,417,161 98.907% 1,401,672 700,836 (2,523) (69,831) 628,482 11,298,414 23 2048 02/01/49100% 2,008,601 (217,506) (358,342) 1,432,753 98.907% 1,417,093 708,547 (2,551) (70,600) 635,396 11,426,807 23.5 2049 08/01/49100% 2,008,601 (217,506) (358,342) 1,432,753 98.907% 1,417,093 708,547 (2,551) (70,600) 635,396 11,551,159 24 2049 02/01/50100% 2,028,687 (217,506) (362,680) 1,448,501 98.907% 1,432,669 716,334 (2,579) (71,376) 642,380 11,672,920 24.5 2050 08/01/50100% 2,028,687 (217,506) (362,680) 1,448,501 98.907% 1,432,669 716,334 (2,579) (71,376) 642,380 11,790,849 25 2050 02/01/51100% 2,048,974 (217,506) (367,062) 1,464,406 98.907% 1,448,400 724,200 (2,607) (72,159) 649,434 11,906,319 25.5 2051 08/01/51100% 2,048,974 (217,506) (367,062) 1,464,406 98.907% 1,448,400 724,200 (2,607) (72,159) 649,434 12,018,155 26 2051 02/01/52 Total32,463,018 (116,867) (3,234,615) 29,111,536 Present Value From 08/01/2024 Present Value Rate 6.50%13,401,752 (48,246) (1,335,351) 12,018,155 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the “District”), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes (M.S.), Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, with plans for demolition and clearance of substandard buildings for the private redevelopment of underutilized property at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. As identified by HRA Resolution 2022-08, parcels consisting of at least 70% of the area of the District were found to be occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, were structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the District. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation, site improvement, and construction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s advisors reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to the anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the overall redevelopment costs for this site. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the costs of site preparation, demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvement costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in market value will be at least $87,556,380. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $13,401,752. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $74,154,628 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The City of Edina Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on March 29, 2023 and approved a resolution to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the redevelopment of substandard and underutilized property, construction of the new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment within the City and the State of Minnesota, an increase in tax base, and add a high-quality development to the City. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Appendix D: Redevelopment Qualifications for the District DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Final Report of Inspection Procedures and Results For Determining Qualifications of a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District as a Redevelopment District Edina HRA Proposed TIF District Edina, Minnesota Stantec Project No. 193804653 February 6, 2019 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 2 Table of Contents PART 1 Executive Summary 3 Purpose of Evaluation 3 Scope of Work 3 Conclusion 4 PART 2 Minnesota Statute 469.174, Subdivision 10 Requirements 4 PART 3 Procedures Followed 6 PART 4 Findings 7 A. Coverage Test 7 B. Condition of Building Test 8 1. Replacement Cost 8 2. Code Deficiencies 8 3. System Condition Deficiencies 9 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures 11 D. Conclusion 11 PART 5 Team Credentials 12 APPENDIX A Map of Proposed TIF District Hennepin County Property Maps APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX C Code Deficiency Estimated Replacement Costs APPENDIX D Photographs DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 3 PART 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF EVALUATION Stantec was retained by the City of Edina HRA to inspect and evaluate the properties within a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District (“TIF District”) proposed to be established by the City. The proposed TIF District is located in the City of Edina, in a general area between 72nd Street West on the north, Gallagher Drive on the south, and France Avenue South on the east (Figure 1). The purpose of Stantec’s work was to determine whether the proposed district meets the statutory requirements for coverage, and whether buildings on the two parcels, located within the proposed TIF District, meet the qualifications required for a Redevelopment District. Figure 1 – Proposed TIF District SCOPE OF WORK The proposed district consists of two (2) parcels containing two (2) commercial multi- tenant office buildings, one (1) over a three-level parking ramp, and one (1) with on- grade paved parking lot. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 4 All the buildings in the proposed district received an onsite interior and exterior inspection. Building Code and Condition Deficiency Reports for each building inspected by Stantec are in Appendix B. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a), it is our professional opinion that the proposed TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment District. The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail. PART 2 – MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS The properties were inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a, which states: Interior Inspection "The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building." Exterior Inspection and Other Means "An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." Documentation "Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)." Qualification Requirements Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a)requires two tests for occupied parcels: 1. Coverage Test ”…parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 5 The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: " For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” 2. Condition of Building Test …”parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; and (2) the conditions described in clause (1) are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the district.” 1. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), which states: “For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.” Definition of Substantial Renovation Substantial renovation, for purposes of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), is defined as renovation with costs exceeding 15 percent of the building's replacement value. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 6 structurally substandard. Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3, clause (1). Failure of a building to be disqualified under the provisions of this paragraph is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition to determining that the building is substandard." "Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence." PART 3 – PROCEDURES FOLLOWED Stantec performed interior and exterior inspections for both commercial buildings within the proposed TIF District on January 23, 2019. Visual observations were made of all levels of all properties and structures, with physical measurements taken where necessary. Area calculations and construction data are based upon information from various sources, as noted. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 7 PART 4 – FINDINGS A. Coverage Test 1. The total square foot area of each parcel in the proposed TIF District was obtained from Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping, and site verification. 2. The total square foot area of buildings and site improvements on the parcels in the proposed TIF District was obtained from City records, Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping, construction documents provided by the City, and site verification. 3. The percentage of coverage for each parcel in the proposed TIF District was computed to determine if the 15 percent minimum requirement was met. The total square footage of parcels meeting the 15 percent requirement was divided into the total square footage of the entire district to determine if the 70 percent requirement was met. Findings: The proposed TIF District met the coverage test under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which resulted in parcels consisting of 100 percent of the area of the proposed TIF District being occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or paved drives or parking lots (Figure 2). This exceeds the 70 percent area coverage requirement for the proposed TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a) (1). Figure 2 – Coverage Test Aerial View DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 8 B. Condition of Building Test 1. Replacement Cost The first step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2019. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, retail, residential, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural fees, legal fees or other “soft" costs not directly related to construction activities. Replacement cost for each building is tabulated in Appendix C. 2. Code Deficiencies The next step in evaluating a building is to determine what code deficiencies exist with respect to such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a building which are not in compliance with current building codes applicable to new buildings in the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), specifically provides that a building cannot be considered structurally substandard if its code deficiencies are not at least 15 percent of the replacement cost of the building. Thus, it was necessary to determine the extent of code deficiencies for each building in the proposed TIF District. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information with respect to such buildings contained in City Building Inspection records and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. Stantec utilized the 2015 Minnesota State Building Code as the official code for our evaluations. The Minnesota State Building Code is a series of provisional codes written specifically for Minnesota only requirements, adoption of several international codes, and amendments to the adopted international codes. After identifying the code deficiencies in each building, we used R.S. Means Cost Works 2019; Unit and Assembly Costs to determine the cost of correcting the identified deficiencies. We were then able to compare the correction costs with the replacement cost of each building to determine if the costs for correcting code deficiencies meet the required 15 percent threshold. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 9 Finding: Both buildings/structures (100 percent) in the proposed TIF District contained code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c). A complete Building Code and Condition Deficiency report for each building/structure in the proposed TIF District can be found in Appendix B of this report. 3. System Condition Deficiencies System condition deficiencies are a measurement of defects or substantial deterioration in site elements, structure, exterior envelope, mechanical and electrical components, fire protection and emergency systems, interior partitions, ceilings, floors, and doors. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information contained in City records; and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. Stantec only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible upon our inspection of the building or contained in City records. We did not consider the amount of "service life" used up for a particular component unless it was an obvious part of that component's deficiencies. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), provides for the minimum threshold of code deficiencies that must be met in order to consider a building substandard. If a building meets the minimum code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), then in order for such building to be "structurally substandard" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), the building's defects or deficiencies should be of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." Based on this definition, Stantec re-evaluated each of the buildings that met the code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), to determine if the total deficiencies warranted "substantial renovation or clearance" based on the criteria we outlined above. Finding: In our professional opinion, both buildings/structures (100 percent) in the proposed TIF District are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance as described below: DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 10 Multi-Tenant Office Building – 7200 France Avenue South – Parcel 3102824140001 This building was found to be structurally substandard with code deficiencies that exceed the 15 percent of the building replacement value criteria as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (b) and (c). Multi-Tenant Office Building/Parking Ramp – 7250 France Avenue South – Parcel 3102824140015 This building and parking ramp was found to be structurally substandard with code deficiencies that exceed the 15 percent of the building replacement value criteria as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (b) and (c). NOTE: The parking ramp has been condemned by the City of Edina due to extreme deterioration of the precast concrete deck planks at the support beams. Structural steel framing has been added in some locations to support the deteriorated precast concrete deck planks prior to the condemnation determination. Building owner has some temporary shoring in place currently to keep the decks in place. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 11 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures Much of this report has focused on the condition of individual buildings as they relate to requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. It is also important to look at the distribution of substandard buildings throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District. Finding: The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District (Figure 3). Figure 3 – Distribution of Substandard Structures (shown hatched green) D. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a, it is our professional opinion that the proposed TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment District. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Page 12 PART 5 – TEAM CREDENTIALS Bruce P. Paulson, AIA – Senior Project Manager/Inspector Bruce has more than 42 years of architectural experience as project architect, project manager, and project designer for municipal, governmental, educational, commercial, hospitality, and healthcare clients. He is involved with all phases of the architectural process, from pre-design through construction administration, including specialty consulting in investigations for buildings, building condition surveys, TIF inspections, code reviews, estimating, and specification writing. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 APPENDIX A DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 2/5/2019 Comments: 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 3102824140001 OWNER NAME: France Equities Ii Llc Et Al PARCEL ADDRESS: 7200 France Ave S, Edina MN 55435 PARCEL AREA: 3.51 acres, 152,751 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $3,300,000 SALE DATA: 09/2018 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $5,226,000 TAX TOTAL: $183,601.62 ASSESSED 2018, PAYABLE 2019 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $6,569,300 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PID:31-028-24-14-0001 Property Address: 7200 France Ave S Lot /Block:000 / 000 Addition:Unplatted 31028 24 Owner(s): Project(s): City of Edina Commercial Field Card Printed:1/22/2019 Assessment Year: 2019 Version:1 Building:1 France Equities II LLC C - Commercial POD-1 Property Type: Zoning: District:53 Neighborhood:1020 Watershed:01 School District:0273 Comments Depreciation and Age Air Cond.)Percent/Type( Mechanicals Heating )Percent/Type( Basement Model Codes Type Building Detail Building Miscellaneous Totals Last Inspection Functional %: Economic %: Physical %: Garages and Parking Type1: Type2: Type3: Type4: Type5: Type Parking-Surface Spaces Area Rental $ Code 1: Code 2: Code 3: Code 4: Suffix % Pools TypeNumber Building Heights Average Story Height:10.5 Number of Stories:3.0 Average Clearance Height:8.0 Finished Ceiling Height:8.0 Miscellaneous Area (SqFt): Basement Area Percent: Electrical Service:Average Plumbing:Average Sprinkler Type / Percent: / Heating 1:100/ HVAC Heating 2: / Heating 3: / A/C 1:100/ Central A/C 2: / A/C 3: / First Floor Area:13,250 Gross Building Area:39,750 Building Areas Income Information Gross Income: Vacancy Percent: Effective Gross Income: Operating Expense: Net Income: Capitalization Rate: Gross Rent Multiplier: Rent / Square Feet: 3 STORY MULTI-TENANT OFFICE BLDG, UNEXCAVATED. ENTRY ON 1ST FLR FROM WEST PARKING LOT WHICH IS BELOW STREET GRADE AND A 2ND FLOOR LOBBY ENTRY FROM FRANCE AVE AT THE EAST SIDE AT STREET GRADE. Original 22,893 SF building was built in 1966. There was a 16,857 SF addition built in 1968. The weighted average year built for the building is 1967. Zoning:1-POD Area Rating:Very Good Site Rating:Fair Land Quality: Contamination: Flood Plain Map Ref: PUD Ref: Allowable Units: Excess Land (SqFt): Zoning Variance:N Frontage:325 Left Side:470 Rear Side 325 Right Side:470 Effective Width:325 Effective Depth:470 Effective Water:0 Property Area (SqFt): 152,751 Acreage:3.51 Park: Park Quality: On Lake: Lake Quality: On River: Curbs Gas Gutter Irregular Shape Paved Street Sewer Available Sidewalk Soil Correction Water Available Attributes Influences Apartment Commercial/Industrial Thru Street Land Actual Age: 1967 Effective Age: 1995 Renovated Age: Quality Partial Construction (%): Overall Quality: Architectural Appeal:Average Construction Quality:Average Construction Type:Masonry Name: On France7200 Walls and Roof Primary Exterior Walls:Concrete Secondary Exterior Walls:Brick Roof Construction:Concrete Roof Type:Flat Income/Lease: Tenant:Tenant-Multi Current Inspection Appraiser ID: Appraisal Date: Reason: Result: Basement Basics Building Ratios and Perimeter Land Building Percent:384.3 Floor Area Percent:26.0 Perimeter Length:634 Office Area: Gross Office Area Percent: Last Sale Flat Value Value: Desc: Date:09/28/2018 Price:$3,300,000 Code:04 Desc:Sale. Partial Int Appraiser ID: SMS Appraisal Date:09/13/2017 Reason: Quintile Review Result: Exterior Bsmt. Model Code Suffix: Elevator(s):1 344 - Office Building - - - Bsmt. Model Code: - Mezzanine Area: Total Floor Area:39,750 Net Rentable Area: O 100 0 0 0 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PID:31-028-24-14-0001 Property Address: 7200 France Ave S Lot /Block:000 / 000 Addition:Unplatted 31028 24 Owner(s): Project(s): City of Edina Commercial Field Card Printed:1/22/2019 Assessment Year: 2019 Version:1 Building:1 France Equities II LLC C - Commercial POD-1 Property Type: Zoning: District:53 Neighborhood:1020 Watershed:01 School District:0273 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 1/22/2019 Comments: 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 3102824140015 OWNER NAME: France Equities Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 7250 France Ave S, Edina MN 55435 PARCEL AREA: 1.68 acres, 73,079 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $6,350,000 SALE DATA: 05/2007 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $4,161,700 TAX TOTAL: $145,822.03 ASSESSED 2018, PAYABLE 2019 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $4,381,000 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2019 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PID:31-028-24-14-0015 Property Address: 7250 France Ave S Lot /Block:044 / 001 Addition:Oscar Roberts First Addition Owner(s): Project(s): City of Edina Commercial Field Card Printed:1/22/2019 Assessment Year: 2019 Version:1 Building:1 France Equities, LLC C - Commercial POD-1 Property Type: Zoning: District:55 Neighborhood:1020 Watershed:01 School District:0273 Comments Depreciation and Age Air Cond.)Percent/Type( Mechanicals Heating )Percent/Type( Basement Model Codes Type Building Detail Building Miscellaneous Totals Last Inspection Functional %: Economic %: Physical %: Garages and Parking Type1: Type2: Type3: Type4: Type5: Type Parking-Ramp Garage-Underground Spaces 195 108 Area 72,691 48,460 Rental $ Code 1: Code 2: Code 3: Code 4: Suffix % Pools TypeNumber Building Heights Average Story Height:11.3 Number of Stories:4.0 Average Clearance Height: Finished Ceiling Height:8.0 Miscellaneous Area (SqFt):3,889 Basement Area Percent:30.7 Electrical Service:Above Average Plumbing:Above Average Sprinkler Type / Percent:100/ Yes Heating 1:100/ HVAC Heating 2: / Heating 3: / A/C 1:100/ Central A/C 2: / A/C 3: / First Floor Area:12,672 Gross Building Area:54,577 Building Areas Income Information Gross Income: Vacancy Percent: Effective Gross Income: Operating Expense: Net Income: Capitalization Rate: Gross Rent Multiplier: Rent / Square Feet: 4 STORY OFFICE BLDG OVER 3 LEVEL RAMP,TOP DECK OF RAMP IS AT STREET GRADE AND 1ST FLR OF OFFICE BLDG; The second parking level has 3,889 SF of finished space with a lunch room, conference room and storage/mechanical rooms. Each floor is 12,672 SF Zoning:1-POD Area Rating:Very Good Site Rating:Very Good Land Quality: Contamination: Flood Plain Map Ref: PUD Ref: Allowable Units: Excess Land (SqFt): Zoning Variance:N Frontage:237 Left Side:303 Rear Side 268 Right Side:300 Effective Width:265 Effective Depth:300 Effective Water:0 Property Area (SqFt): 73,080 Acreage:1.68 Park: Park Quality: On Lake: Lake Quality: On River: Curbs Gas Gutter Irregular Shape Paved Street Sewer Available Sidewalk Water Available Attributes Influences Apartment Commercial/Industrial Thru Street Land Actual Age: 1973 Effective Age: 1995 Renovated Age: Quality Partial Construction (%): Overall Quality: Architectural Appeal:Average Construction Quality:Average/ Good Construction Type:Reinforced Concrete Name:EDINA PROFESSIONAL BLDG Walls and Roof Primary Exterior Walls:Concrete Secondary Exterior Walls:Glass Roof Construction:Concrete Roof Type:Flat Income/Lease: Tenant:Tenant-Multi Current Inspection Appraiser ID: Appraisal Date: Reason: Result: Basement Basics Building Ratios and Perimeter Land Building Percent:133.9 Floor Area Percent:74.7 Perimeter Length:464 Office Area: Gross Office Area Percent: Last Sale Flat Value Value: Desc: Date:05/18/2007 Price:$6,350,000 Code:00 Desc:Good Sale Appraiser ID: SMS Appraisal Date:11/27/2012 Reason: Quintile Review Result: Interior Bsmt. Model Code Suffix:O Elevator(s):2 341 - Medical Office - - - Bsmt. Model Code:Medical Office - 341 Mezzanine Area: Total Floor Area:54,577 Net Rentable Area: O 100 0 0 0 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PID:31-028-24-14-0015 Property Address: 7250 France Ave S Lot /Block:044 / 001 Addition:Oscar Roberts First Addition Owner(s): Project(s): City of Edina Commercial Field Card Printed:1/22/2019 Assessment Year: 2019 Version:1 Building:1 France Equities, LLC C - Commercial POD-1 Property Type: Zoning: District:55 Neighborhood:1020 Watershed:01 School District:0273 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 APPENDIX B DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED EDINA HRA TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT February 6, 2019 Property ID No.: 3102824140001 7200 France Avenue South Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 1-23-19, 8:00 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: 3 Story Commercial Multi-Tenant Office Building Type of Construction: Exterior masonry foundation and bearing walls, slab on grade at first floor, precast concrete floor and roof planks with concrete topping at second and third floors. Date of Construction: Original building constructed in 1966; addition constructed in 1968. Structure Size(s): 22,893 SF original building; 16,857 SF addition Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Structurally substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $7,870,500.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $2,109,720.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 26.8% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Replace deteriorated masonry retaining wall at east side of building before it fails • Current code requires all outswinging exit doors to have a structural stoop with frost footings to prevent heaving which could restrict the door swing and access/egress capability. • Sidewalks to both first floor exterior entrance doors are in need of replacement due to spalling and missing concrete. • Stair riser heights do not comply with current codes. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current codes. • Restrooms are not in compliance with ADA guidelines. • All exterior windows are single-glazed. • All exterior walls are under-uninsulated. • Dead level built-up roofing system, where visible, shows signs of blistering, indicating roofing system is at end of its useful life. • The existing roof is under-insulated. • The existing lighting system does not comply with current codes for daylight harvesting and energy-efficiency. • The existing mechanical system does not comply with current codes for ventilation. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED EDINA HRA TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT February 6, 2019 Property ID No.: 3102824140015 7250 France Avenue South Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 1-23-19, 7:00 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: 4 Story Commercial Multi-Tenant Office Building over 3 level parking ramp. Top deck of ramp is at street level and first floor of building. Type of Construction: Exterior masonry foundation and bearing walls, slab on grade at first floor, precast concrete floor and roof planks with concrete topping at second and third floors. Date of Construction: Building constructed in 1972. Parking Ramp Building Structure Size(s): Sub-basement/first parking level 49,100 GSF Basement/second parking level 49,100 GSF First Floor/street parking level 24,500 GSF 12,672 GSF Second Floor 12,672 GSF Third Floor 12,672 GSF Fourth Floor 12,672 GSF Penthouse 773 GSF Totals 122,700 GSF 51,461 GSF Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Structurally substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: Parking Ramp $11,901,900.00 Office Building $10,189,278.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $14,041,457.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: Parking Ramp 100% Building 20.9% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Parking ramp has been condemned by the City of Edina and requires total replacement • Restrooms are not in compliance with ADA guidelines. • Existing stairs are not in compliance with current codes for tread depth and riser heights. Handrails and guardrails at stairs do not comply with current codes for height or extension beyond top and bottom of stair runs. • All exterior walls are under-uninsulated. • The existing fully-adhered EPDM roofing system is under-insulated. • The existing lighting system does not comply with current codes for daylight harvesting and energy-efficiency. • The existing mechanical system does not comply with current codes for ventilation. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 APPENDIX C DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED EDINA HRA TIF DISTRICT ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS 1 Property ID No. & Property Address: 3102824140001 7200 France Avenue South Replace exterior masonry retaining wall at east side of building – 156’ x 8’ high x $55/SF $68,640.00 Replace aluminum guardrail at retaining wall 156LF x $125/LF $19,500.00 Replace exterior doors (4) Remove existing doors and frames – 9 @ $500/EA $4,500.00 New 3’ wide aluminum entrance door and frame 9 @ $3,050/EA $27,450.00 West front entrance stoop upgrade Demo existing sidewalk – 3 CY @ $385/CY $1,155.00 New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $410/CY $820.00 New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $12.75/SF $714.00 New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $385/CY $963.00 Replace sidewalk to parking lot – 5 CY @ $300/CY $1,500.00 South front entrance stoop upgrade Demo existing sidewalk – 3 CY @ $385/CY $1,155.00 New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $410/CY $820.00 New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $12.75/SF $714.00 New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $385/CY $963.00 Replace sidewalk to parking lot – 2.5 CY @ $300/CY $750.00 Upgrade three (3) stairs – 126 Risers @ $685/riser $86,310.00 Replace handrails at stairs - 293 LF @ $37/LF $10,841.00 Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Male Restrooms – 2 water closets, 2 urinals, 2 lavatories 180 SF @ $450/SF x 3 $243,000.00 Female Restrooms – 3 water closets, 3 lavatories 180 SF @ $450/SF x 3 $243,000.00 Replace existing single-glazed windows with new thermally- Improved frames and insulating glass – 1,988 SF @ $93/SF $184.884.00 Insulate exterior masonry walls – 17,500 SF @ $15/SF $262,500.00 Replace built-up roofing system with new fully adhered TPO roofing system with R-31.25 insulation 12,912 SF @ $13.00/SF $167,856.00 Replace lighting system – 35,775 SF @ $8.50/SF $304,088.00 HVAC System upgrade – 35,775 SF @ $7.85/SF $280,834.00 Ventilation System upgrade – 37,775 SF @ $5.50/SF $196,763.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $2,109,720.00 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 CITY OF EDINA PROPOSED EDINA HRA TIF DISTRICT ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS 2 Property ID No. & Property Address: 3102824140015 7250 France Avenue South Replace parking ramp – 122,700 SF x $97/SF $11,901,900.00 Upgrade two (2) stairs – 190 Risers @ $685/riser $130,150.00 Replace handrails at stairs - 301 LF @ $37/LF $11,137.00 Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Male Restroom – 1 water closet, 1 urinal, 1 lavatory (basement) 80 SF @ $450/SF $36,000.00 Female Restroom – 1 water closet, 1 lavatory (basement) 80 SF @ $450/SF $36,000.00 Male Restrooms – 2 water closets, 1 urinal, 2 lavatories 120 SF @ $450/SF x 4 $216,000.00 Female Restrooms – 3 water closets, 3 lavatories 120 SF @ $450/SF x 4 $216,000.00 Insulate exterior walls (35% glazed) – 13,674 SF @ $15/SF $205,110.00 Replace fully-adhered EPDM roofing system with new fully adhered TPO roofing system with R-31.25 insulation 12,672 SF @ $13.00/SF $164,736.00 Replace lighting system – 51.461 SF @ $8.50/SF $437,419.00 HVAC System upgrade – 51,461 SF @ $7.85/SF $403,969.00 Ventilation System upgrade – 51,461 SF @ $5.50/SF $283,036.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $14,041,457.00 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 APPENDIX D DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 1: South entrance/exit door at 7200 does not have structural stoop with frost footings Photo 2: West entrance/exit doors at 7200 does not have structural stoop with frost footings – sidewalk is also damaged Photo 3: Damaged sidewalk to south entrance/exit door at 7200 Photo 4: Stair treads/risers and handrails at 7200 do not comply with current does DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 5: Stair handrails and guardrails at 7200 to not comply with current codes Photo 6: Restrooms at 7200 are not ADA compliant Photo 7: Restrooms at 7200 are not ADA compliant Photo 8: Single-glazed windows at 7200 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 9: Single-glazed windows at 7200 Photo 10: Single-glazed windows at 7200 Photo 11: Built-up roofing system at 7200 is under-insulated Photo 12: Built-up roofing system at 7200 is under-insulated DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 13: Built-up roofing system at 7200 is under-insulated Photo 14: Built-up roofing system at 7200 is under-insulated Photo 15: Built-up roofing system at 7200 is under-insulated Photo 16: Built-up roofing system at 7200 is under-insulated DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 17: Interior lighting at 7200 Photo 18: Interior lighting at 7200 Photo 19: Interior lighting at 7200 Photo 20: Mechanical roof-top equipment at 7200 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 21: Mechanical roof-top equipment at 7200 Photo 22: Mechanical roof-top equipment at 7200 Photo 23: Mechanical roof-top equipment at 7200 Photo 24: Mechanical roof-top equipment at 7200 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 25: West elevation at 7200 Photo 26: South elevation at 7200 Photo 27: East elevation at 7200 Photo 28: North elevation at 7200 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 29: Deteriorated masonry retaining wall at 7200 Photo 30: Deteriorated masonry retaining wall at 7200 Photo 31: Deteriorated masonry retaining wall at 7200 Photo 32: Deteriorated masonry retaining wall at 7200 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 9 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 33: 7250 Parking ramp deteriorated precast concrete Photo 34: 7250 Parking ramp structural steel shoring Photo 35: 7250 Parking ramp deterioration at bearing wall and steel angles and plates added to support deck above Photo 36: 7250 Parking ramp temporary shoring DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 37: 7250 Parking ramp structural steel shoring Photo 38: 7250 Parking ramp deteriorated concrete beam Photo 39: 7250 Parking ramp deteriorated concrete deck planks Photo 40: 7250 Parking ramp deteriorated concrete beam DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 11 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 41: 7250 Parking ramp hole in ramp plank Photo 42: 7250 Parking ramp temporary shoring Photo 43: 7250 restrooms not ADA compliant Photo 44: 7250 restrooms not ADA compliant DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 45: 7250 stairs, handrails and guardrails not code compliant Photo 46: 7250 stairs, handrails and guardrails not code compliant Photo 47: 7250 roof under-insulated-insulation fasteners show heat transfer-melted snow Photo 48: 7250 roof under-insulated-insulation fasteners show heat transfer-melted snow DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 13 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 49: 7250 roof under-insulated-insulation fasteners show heat transfer-melted snow Photo 50: 7250 roof under-insulated-insulation fasteners show heat transfer-melted snow Photo 51: 7250 interior Photo 52: 7250 interior DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 53: 7250 interior Photo 54: 7250 interior Photo 55: 7250 interior Photo 56: 7250 interior DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY 193804653 15 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS Photo 57: 7250 roof-top mechanical equipment Photo 58: 7250 roof-top mechanical equipment Photo 59: 7250 roof-top mechanical equipment Photo 60: 7250 roof-top mechanical equipment DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Appendix E: Project Description DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 1 Project Description The 72nd and France 2 TIF Plan has been prepared to help facilitate coordinated redevelopment of two vacant and obsolete commercial properties in a manner that is consistent with Edina’s applicable standards and policies for new development. These documents include but are not limited to: Comprehensive Plan, approved 8-18-2020 Greater Southdale Area Plan, adopted 12-18-2018 Greater Southdale Design Experience Guidelines, approved 3-5-2019 Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan, as modified 3-22-2022 Sustainable Buildings Policy, revised 9-7-2022 Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy, revised 12-8-2022 Tax Increment Financing Policy, revised 12-20-2022 This TIF Plan is applicable to the 5-acre “Site” which primarily includes two commercial parcels located on the west side of France Avenue between 72nd Street and Gallagher Avenue. The Site also includes the adjacent street right of way that provides access to the site as well as connections to other parcels on the opposite sides of each of the surrounding streets. The Site is intended to be redeveloped by a team lead by Orion Investments with a variety of partners and advisors. The developer team will be structured as 7250 France Group, LLC, France Property Partners, LLC or an affiliated entity. The Edina City Council via adoption of Resolution 2023-11 and Ordinance 2022-13 approved the rezoning, overall development plan for the Site and final site plan for Phase 1. Final site plan approval for Phase 2 is anticipated to occur in the near future. Both phases of the project are intended to be redeveloped in a manner consistent with the Greater Southdale District Plan and the Greater Southdale Area Design Experience Guidelines to fulfill a portion of the City’s vision for overall redevelopment in the area. Both phases of the Site are also expected to adhere to the City’s environmental Concept site plan showing 7200 and 7250 properties and anticipated two-phase redevelopment. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 2 sustainability objectives as adopted in the Sustainable Buildings Policy. The developer and their agents will use good faith efforts to meet the social equity objectives, specifically applying strategic efforts to increase the number of underrepresented people in the actual construction of the projects as well as structuring contracts to provide realistic opportunities for minority- and women- owned businesses to meaningfully participate in the construction contracts. Redevelopment of the Site is anticipated to occur in two phases. The first phase at 7250 France Avenue will consist of a new modern Class A professional multi-tenant office building with street level commercial spaces and below-grade structured parking. The five-level building has approximately 138,000 square feet of rentable space and will create and retain hundreds of professional jobs in Edina. This is likely to result in many additional visitors to the Greater Southdale District during Monday-Friday business hours. This phase will also deliver new infrastructure on the entire Site including utilities, public sidewalks with streetscape around the perimeter of the Site, a private north/south roadway with adjacent dedicated sidewalk/bike trail, a shared stormwater retention basin to serve the Site as well as the adjacent residential properties, and new public plaza areas. The first phase will also include preparation of a pad for the second phase at 7200 France Avenue. This pad may serve as a temporary parking area until Phase 2 is constructed. After the Site is redeveloped, the developer will encumber portions of the private property with permanent easements to ensure that the public realm elements are readily available to the public and to ensure that the stormwater needs of surrounding properties are maintained. In compliance with the approved rezoning, the second phase of redevelopment is anticipated to consist of a building containing either new multi-family housing building or hotel. A housing facility would consist of up to a total of 150 market rate and affordable units and possibly street level commercial space. Alternatively, the second phase may consist of new upscale or luxury / boutique hotel with approximately 100 to 150 rooms and amenities such as restaurant, shop, meeting-event space and/or beauty spa that are also open to Concept rendering of Phase 1 multi-tenant professional office building at 7250 France Avenue from Gallagher & France intersection. Birdseye concept rendering of Phase 2 multi-family residential or luxury hotel at 7200 France Ave. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 3 the general public. Shared structured parking for the use of both new buildings will be provided below grade with minimal surface parking stalls. Removal of the Site’s two vacant and substandard buildings occurs as a precursor to the first phase of redevelopment. These structures suffered from deferred maintenance by previous ownership groups as they become obsolete in the marketplace over time. The HRA adopted findings through passage of Resolution 2022-08 to designate these buildings as substandard and facilitate their demolition and removal. (See Appendix D for inspection findings) The proposed redevelopment will advance many of the goals identified in Edina’s Comprehensive Plan including: Encourage … vibrant neighborhood nodes … (pg. 10-16) Live and Work … support commercial and mixed-use areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city and the larger region (pg. 3-47) Retain and attract employment opportunities (pg. 10-15) Residential Development Mix … support a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs, preferences, income levels and life stages for today and future Edina community (pg. 4-23 and 4-24) Sustainability … protect the natural environment, promote energy efficiency, conserve natural resources, and minimize impacts (pg. 3-46) The proposal is also consistent with several of the goals identified in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan including: Mixed Use Development … support redevelopment that includes retail, housing, and employment in walkable neighborhoods (SERP 3-4(6)) Multi-modal Transportation Options … improve access for pedestrians and bicyclists (SERP 3-4(4)) Piecemeal redevelopment of these two individual properties would be unlikely to achieve some of the fundamental goals of the Greater Southdale District Plan – primarily the subdivision of large tracts of land without any through access for the general public. Coordinated redevelopment of both adjacent properties is essential to achieve numerous positive outcomes that add vitality to the France Avenue corridor and the Greater Southdale District. These tangible benefits are intended to include: New wide public sidewalks with landscaped boulevards, lighting, and streetscape elements along Gallagher, France, and 72nd New north-south private roadway that creates a new route for vehicles traveling between the two commercial parcels without using France Avenue New public sidewalk and bicycle trail that provides pedestrian and active transportation access between Gallagher and 72nd Street that is separated from vehicles – one of the first segments of the envisioned “western promenade” New stormwater basin with native plantings and other landscaping that serves the Site as well as all adjacent residential parcels DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 4 New public plazas and scenic overlooks that create new public realm amenities with streetscaping, landscaping and public art Potential to accommodate future enlarged mass transit station (BRT or similar) on France Avenue Potential for new or future underground or elevated connection across France Avenue for pedestrians and bicyclists Additional positive outcomes from the coordinate redevelopment are anticipated to be the addition of a new class A office facility within Phase 1 that will attract the creation (and help retain) hundreds of quality jobs to the community. The influx will bring additional Monday through Friday patronage to local businesses and help sustain a robust local economy. The Phase 2 hotel will diversify local lodging options and generate additional hospitality sales taxes used to support the Explore Edina Visitors Bureau and its actions to promote the community to visitors and guests. The Edina HRA via adoption of Resolution 2022-08 recognized the substandard nature of the existing buildings in advance of the creation of a new TIF District. This recognition allowed the demolition of the heavily vandalized buildings to occur as soon as possible. Demolition of the substandard structures is anticipated to be completed in 2023 with site preparation for the new buildings to follow. Phase 1 and Phase 2 redevelopment projects are anticipated to be completed by 2026 and 2027, respectively. The cost to clear the fully developed site and create the numerous public realm amenities increases the development budget significantly. The Edina HRA proposes to utilize incremental property taxes generated from the redeveloped Site to offset an anticipated private financing gap induced by these costs. Qualifying expenditures eligible for reimbursement with TIF include: demolition, site preparation, utilities, roadway infrastructure, sidewalk and bicycle trail infrastructure, pedestrian connections, stormwater facilities, streetscaping and landscaping on public plazas and other public realm areas. The HRA proposes to reimburse the developer for a portion of qualifying expenses through two interest-bearing pay-as-you-go (PAY- GO) TIF Notes issued separately only after each phase of the project is successfully completed. The TIF Notes would be payable solely from tax increment collected from the redeveloped Site. The HRA and City would bear no obligation to use any other funds to make payments on the TIF Notes. DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Appendix F: Permit Research DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Report Name: Permit Search Printed: 2/9/2023 Page: 1Permit Search Results City of Edina Permit #Permit Type Sub Type Work Type Description Issued Date Final Date House Use Dead Date Cancel Date Street Unit Valuation ePerm User 1 User 2Exp Date PID ED199393 Building Office,Ban k,Professio nal (324or437) Other Demolition (645-649) Total demolition 9/13/227200 France Ave S Business 168,000 Yes mr 3102824140001 ED199722 Sewer & Water Commercia l Sewer and Water Disconnect Disconnect for Demolition 8/22/22 9/2/227200 France Ave S 5,000 Yes 3102824140001 2 Permit record(s) found Total Valuation: 173,000 Building Per mit S u m m ar y January 1, 2 0 2 1 t o F e br u ar y 9, 2 0 2 3 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PERMIT City of Edina Permit Type: Sewer & Water Permit Number: ED199722 *ED199722* Date Issued: 08/22/2022 Permit Category: ePermitSite Address: 7200 France Ave S Lot: 000 Block: 000 Addition: Unplatted 31 028 24 PID: 31-028-24-14-0001 Use: 4801 50th St West Edina, MN 55424 952-826-0372 www.edinamn.gov Description: Sub Type: Commercial Sewer and Water Work Type: Disconnect Description: Disconnect for Demolition Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size Comments:Contact Edina Public Works to shut off water - 952-826-0375. It is the requirement of the permit applicant to call to schedule an inspection. Contact the Inspections Department at 952-826-0372 to schedule required inspections. APPLICATION FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE. Valuation: 5,000.00 Fee Summary:Revenue CodeAmountDescription Residential (SW)$124.60 4116 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $2.50 4380 $127.10 Total: I have read the information contained herein and certified it to be correct. I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the approved plans, the Edina City Code, and the Minnesota State Building Code and/or Minnesota State Fire Code. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - France Property Partners Llc 708 5th St Se B-100 Minneapolis MN 55414 (763) 424-1504 Triple E Water And Sewer 5232 Hanson Crt N Crystal MN 55429 (763) 207-8068 St. Lic: PB710895 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: SignatureDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PERMIT City of Edina Permit Type: Building Permit Number: ED199393 *ED199393* Date Issued: 09/13/2022 Permit Category: ePermitSite Address: 7200 France Ave S Lot: 000 Block: 000 Addition: Unplatted 31 028 24 PID: 31-028-24-14-0001 Use: Business 4801 50th St West Edina, MN 55424 952-826-0372 www.edinamn.gov Description: Sub Type: Office,Bank,Professional (324or437) Work Type: Other Demolition (645-649) Description: Total demolition Census Code: 650 - Demolition - Entire Comm Building Zoning: Square Feet: 0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:9/6/22- Removing 43 protecting 10. LO Hennepin County is conducting a waste study in summer and fall of 2022 and may reach out regarding your renovation/remodeling permit to request a voluntary site visit and/or interview about your project. Please contact Valuation: 168,000.00 Fee Summary:Revenue CodeAmountDescription Building Permit Fee $1,772.00 4111 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $84.00 4380 Building Application Fee Credit ($840.00) 1495.4111 $1,016.00 Total: I have read the information contained herein and certified it to be correct. I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the approved plans, the Edina City Code, and the Minnesota State Building Code and/or Minnesota State Fire Code. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - France Property Partners Llc 708 5th St Se B-100 Minneapolis MN 55414 (952) 200-3680 RACHEL CONTRACTING 4125 NAPIER COURT NE ST MICHAEL MN 55376 (763) 424-1500 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: SignatureDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Report Name: Permit Search Printed: 2/9/2023 Page: 1Permit Search Results City of Edina Permit #Permit Type Sub Type Work Type Description Issued Date Final Date House Use Dead Date Cancel Date Street Unit Valuation ePerm User 1 User 2Exp Date PID ED199392 Building Office,Ban k,Professio nal (324or437) Other Demolition (645-649) Total demolition 9/7/227250 France Ave S Business 432,000 Yes mr 3102824140015 ED199723 Sewer & Water Commercia l Sewer and Water Disconnect Disconnect for demo 8/22/22 9/2/227250 France Ave S 5,000 Yes 3102824140015 ED195091 Building Parking Garage/Ra mp (321or437) Maintenance /Repair/Repl ace Temporary Shoring to stabilize parking ramp 2/2/22 2/10/227250 France Ave S 7250 France Parking Ramp 59,694 Yes js 3102824140015 3 Permit record(s) found Total Valuation: 496,694 Building P er mit S u m m ar y January 1, 2 0 2 1 t o F e br u ar y 9, 2 0 2 3 DRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PERMIT City of Edina Permit Type: Building Permit Number: ED199392 *ED199392* Date Issued: 09/07/2022 Permit Category: ePermitSite Address: 7250 France Ave S Lot: 044 Block: 001 Addition: Oscar Roberts First Addition PID: 31-028-24-14-0015 Use: Business 4801 50th St West Edina, MN 55424 952-826-0372 www.edinamn.gov Description: Sub Type: Office,Bank,Professional (324or437) Work Type: Other Demolition (645-649) Description: Total demolition Census Code: 650 - Demolition - Entire Comm Building Zoning: Square Feet: 0 Occupancy: Construction Type: Comments:9/6/22- Removing 42 trees and protecting 10. LO Hennepin County is conducting a waste study in summer and fall of 2022 and may reach out regarding your renovation/remodeling permit to request a voluntary site visit and/or interview about your project. Please contact Valuation: 432,000.00 Fee Summary:Revenue CodeAmountDescription Building Permit Fee $3,620.00 4111 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $216.00 4380 Building Application Fee Credit ($2,160.00) 1495.4111 $1,676.00 Total: I have read the information contained herein and certified it to be correct. I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the approved plans, the Edina City Code, and the Minnesota State Building Code and/or Minnesota State Fire Code. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - France Property Partners Llc 708 5th St Se B-100 Minneapolis MN 55414 (952) 200-3680 RACHEL CONTRACTING 4125 NAPIER COURT NE ST MICHAEL MN 55376 (763) 424-1500 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: SignatureDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PERMIT City of Edina Permit Type: Sewer & Water Permit Number: ED199723 *ED199723* Date Issued: 08/22/2022 Permit Category: ePermitSite Address: 7250 France Ave S Lot: 044 Block: 001 Addition: Oscar Roberts First Addition PID: 31-028-24-14-0015 Use: 4801 50th St West Edina, MN 55424 952-826-0372 www.edinamn.gov Description: Sub Type: Commercial Sewer and Water Work Type: Disconnect Description: Disconnect for demo Meter Size Meter Type Manufacturer Serial Number Remote Number Line Size Comments:Contact Edina Public Works to shut off water - 952-826-0375. It is the requirement of the permit applicant to call to schedule an inspection. Contact the Inspections Department at 952-826-0372 to schedule required inspections. APPLICATION FEE IS NON-REFUNDABLE. Valuation: 5,000.00 Fee Summary:Revenue CodeAmountDescription Residential (SW)$124.60 4116 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $2.50 4380 $127.10 Total: I have read the information contained herein and certified it to be correct. I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the approved plans, the Edina City Code, and the Minnesota State Building Code and/or Minnesota State Fire Code. Contractor:Owner:- Applicant - France Property Partners Llc 708 5th St Se B-100 Minneapolis MN 55414 (763) 424-1504 Triple E Water And Sewer 5232 Hanson Crt N Crystal MN 55429 (763) 207-8068 St. Lic: PB710895 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: SignatureDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 PERMIT City of Edina Permit Type: Building Permit Number: ED195091 *ED195091* Date Issued: 02/02/2022 Permit Category: ePermitSite Address: 7250 France Ave S Lot: 044 Block: 001 Addition: Oscar Roberts First Addition PID: 31-028-24-14-0015 Use: 7250 France Parking Ramp 4801 50th St West Edina, MN 55424 952-826-0372 www.edinamn.gov Description: Sub Type: Parking Garage/Ramp (321or437) Work Type: Maintenance/Repair/Replace Description: Temporary Shoring to stabilize parking ramp Census Code: 321 - Parking Garage Zoning: Square Feet: 0 Occupancy:S-2 Construction Type: II-B Comments:2/1/22 JS, MN PE to sign a final inspection letter for a final approval. It is the requirement of the permit applicant to call to schedule an inspection. Contact the Inspections Department at 952-826-0372 to schedule required inspections. Valuation: 59,694.00 Fee Summary:Revenue CodeAmountDescription Building Permit Fee $922.00 4111 Plan Review Commercial $599.30 4111 Surcharge - Based on Valuation $29.85 4380 Building Application Fee Credit ($298.47) 1495.4111 $1,252.68 Total: I have read the information contained herein and certified it to be correct. I agree to do the proposed work in accordance with the approved plans, the Edina City Code, and the Minnesota State Building Code and/or Minnesota State Fire Code. Contractor:Owner: France Property Partners Llc 708 5th St Se B-100 Minneapolis MN 55414 Applicant/Permitee: Signature Issued By: SignatureDRAFT for REVIEW 3-8-2023 Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments 72nd and France 2 TIF District Better Together Edina Project: 72nd & France 2 TIF District VISITORS 10 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 2 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 2 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Stein Email:rstein8@msn.com Responded At:Mar 23, 2023 11:33:07 am Last Seen:Mar 23, 2023 18:45:36 pm IP Address:68.46.120.254 Q1.First and Last Name Richard Stein Q2.Address 7016 Bristol Blvd Q3.Comment The developers want $34 Million in TIF Assistance via “incremental” of “new” property taxes collected within the boundaries of the TIF District, to address a gap in the budgeting. Did the precedent set by the city to provide TIF money to the US Bank Property developer entice the 7200 France Avenue Property developer for TIF Assistance? The TIF Assistance was granted to the US Bank Property Development over strong objections from the Edina Taxpayers. Our city council took a paternalistic approach and said “they know what is best for the city”. Now the 7200 France Avenue Hotel/Restaurant Developer is asking for TIF money. How much should Edina Taxpayers fund developers? We challenge the use of TIF at all. What will happen if future, unpredicted shortfalls occur during construction, before completion, but all the budget & TIF funds are used? Are the citizens of Edina on the hook for the project? What is the benefit to Edina Citizens then? We understand that the proposed development of the Macy’s Furniture Property anticipates TIF Assistance as well. The city council has opened the door. Respondent No:2 Login:Stein Email:rstein8@msn.com Responded At:Mar 23, 2023 17:29:33 pm Last Seen:Mar 23, 2023 18:45:36 pm IP Address:68.46.120.254 Q1.First and Last Name Richard Stein Q2.Address 7016 Bristol Blvd Q3.Comment The following are issues that we see with the proposed 7200 France Avenue Hotel/Restaurant Sketch Plan which are not compatible with family neighborhoods and should be addressed: 1. This side of France is zoned for 4 stories and this area is a pinch point where residential meets the business area. Our city council leaders in the 50’s allowed residential development on the west side to France Avenue to happen and we think the current council should respect it. 2. The developers want $34 Million in TIF Assistance via “incremental” of “new” property taxes collected within the boundaries of the TIF District, to address a gap in the budgeting. Did the precedent set by the city to provide TIF money to the US Bank Property developer entice the 7200 France Avenue Property developer for TIF Assistance? The TIF Assistance was granted to the US Bank Property Development over strong objections from the Edina Taxpayers. Our city council took a paternalistic approach and said “they know what is best for the city”. Now the 7200 France Avenue Hotel/Restaurant Developer is asking for TIF money. How much should Edina Taxpayers fund developers? We challenge the use of TIF at all. What will happen if future, unpredicted shortfalls occur during construction, before completion, but all the budget & TIF funds are used? Are the citizens of Edina on the hook for the project? What is the benefit to Edina Citizens then? We understand that the proposed development of the Macy’s Furniture Property anticipates TIF Assistance as well. The city council has opened the door. 3. Do we need another hotel? We have the Weston, Hilton, Residence Inn, Homewood Suites and not to mention the Bloomington Hotels along the 494 corridors. Would it please other areas of Edina to have a hotel in their backyard? Please care about the people who have been living in this neighborhood for 30+ years, retired and have a limited ability to move elsewhere in Edina. 4. The Hotel traffic access point will encourage increased traffic through the neighborhood on 72nd Street. This objection was raised during the public hearings when the proposed Office building on 7250 France was reviewed. The increased traffic will also likely impact the safety of the students who use the Cornelia School and has been a concern with other development proposals for this property. 5. The night-time noise is expected to increase. In general, hotel check-in traffic continues late into the night. 6. A roof top restaurant is expected to have activity that will create objectional noise during the quiet evening hours. The proposed 72-foot height will enable the transmission of that noise into the neighborhood. The mechanical equipment noise at that height, will only add to that noise. 7. The hotel entrance and rooftop lighting needs will increase the night time lighting in the adjacent neighborhood. 8. The construction noise and expected traffic are objectionable. We experienced objectionable noise during the construction of the Bower and we expect constant early morning into the night noise of the proposed hotel construction. 9. The impact of the construction traffic will deteriorate the roads of the neighborhoods. Not just 70th Street, Gallagher Drive and France Avenue, but streets through the neighborhoods as drivers look for alternative routes avoiding the construction. 10. The proposed West Broadway in the Sketch Plan maybe a safety issue. It is a north-south public easement between 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive. The plan does not reveal an obvious separation between pedestrians and vehicles for West Broadway. It is also likely to be a traffic cut-through from 72nd Street to Gallaher Drive then to France Ave. The neighborhood since the 50’s has lived with 2 office buildings on this site. Our house was built in 1959. We accepted daytime noise but after 4:30/5:00 pm the area was quiet. On West side of France Avenue, we believe quiet residential use should be respected. This is one of the more affordable single-family neighborhoods left in Edina. Why can’t we have the same considerations as other areas such as Highlands, Creekside, etc. for quiet. Why can’t the city Government treat us like the other neighborhoods? The office buildings previously built were in need of replacement. Please replace them with office buildings and again respect the building codes, with no retail and with no TIF. Richard Stein and Marianne Rother The CITY ofEDINA Establish the 72nd and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District March 23, 2023 Edina HRA April 4, 2023 Public Hearing April 18, 2023 Edina City Council www.EdinaMN.gov The CITY ofEDINA 2 Requested Action -by Edina HRA and City Council The a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District is proposed at 72nd & France. This TIF District is intended to support private redevelopment of two vacant commercial parcels in a manner that delivers several benefits to the general public. The Resolution will establish a TIF Plan that sets the boundaries, budget and duration of the TIF District. The TIF Plan also documents the qualifying conditions and confirms the “but for” test. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution. The CITY ofEDINABackground -Site Location 3 The CITY ofEDINA Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society The Oscar Roberts Company 7200 France Ave Built 1967-69 Demolished 2022 Background -Former office buildings The Prestige Office Building 7250 France Ave Built 1972-74 Demolished 2022 4 The CITY ofEDINA 5Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society 7250 France Ave. Source: Stantec Consulting; Existing conditions report dated Feb. 6, 2019 Conditions worsened significantly from 2019-2022 when the buildings were vacant Background -Substandard Conditions The CITY ofEDINA 6Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Background -Substandard Conditions Vacant Not safe for occupancy Temporary shoring Security fencing Heavy vandalism Frequent trespassing The CITY ofEDINA 7Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Background -Substandard Conditions The CITY ofEDINA 8Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Background -Stormwater Conditions Stormwater collects on western portion of the property including drainage from neighboring properties The CITY ofEDINA 9Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Background -Previous Attempts to Redevelop 2014 2018 2016 2020 –21 Concepts only 2019 2017-18 The CITY ofEDINA 10 PUD Zoning and Phase 1 (7250) Site Approval February 7, 2023 Phase 2 (7200 site) entitlements anticipated 2023-2024 Approved Site Plan North 7200 7250 The CITY ofEDINA 11 Background -Community Vision & Plans Multi-modal Transportation Options -… improve access for pedestrians and bicyclists...” (SERP 3-4(4)) Mixed Use Development… support redevelopment that includes retail, housing and employment in walkable neighborhoods (SERP page 3-4(6)) Sustainability … protect the natural environment, promote energy efficiency, conserve natural resources and minimize impacts (Comp Plan pg 3-46) The CITY ofEDINA •Economic development financing tool used throughout the U.S. •Governed by Minnesota Statute •Enabled by City Council •“Tax Increment” Financing -uses growth in property tax base to fund private investment and public infrastructure 12 How TIF works Growth of Property Tax Base “Incremental Taxes” remain in TIF District Original + Market Value Taxes available to all agencies Original + Incremental Taxes available to all agencies Year 1 Year 25 Year 40+ $10.95M $98.5 M The CITY ofEDINA 13 How TIF works MN Statute allows TIF to be used to provide funding to attract private investment. TIF monies can be used for a variety of eligible expenses at the discretion of the local City Council. Edina’s TIF practice is to use TIF only when necessary. TIF should only reimburse a developer after projects are completed. The amount of TIF provided should be commensurate with the cost of elements that deliver long term public benefits. The CITY ofEDINA 14 How TIF works TIF in Edina is used on a limited basis and to a lesser extent than neighboring cities The CITY ofEDINASteps to Establish TIF District 15 •Boundaries •Project Scope •Budget •Term •Qualifications •But-for Step 1)Create “District” •Private developments •Public improvements Step 2)Consider Funding for Specific Projects •4-year knock down •5-year construction •Annual reporting •Debt payments •De-certification Step 3) Monitoring & Compliance Action considered today Action considered separately / in future Plan Commission HRA Board School / CountyPublic Hearing City Council HRA Board (April/May 2023) City Council (April/May 2023) The CITY ofEDINA •2 parcels •5 acres, extends to adjacent streets •Terminate the previous “Housing” District •Create new “Redevelopment” District •25 year term (2026-2051) •Original Tax Capacity = $217,506 •Projected Tax Capacity = $2,048,974 -Used to establish maximum budget 16 Proposed TIF Plan –location & duration The CITY ofEDINA Estimated Incremental Property Tax Collected •$34.0 million •Over 25 year term •With interest earnings •Excludes base taxes distributed to County, Schools, City, etc 17 Projected Uses of Tax Increment Funds •Acquisition $1.0 M •Site improvements $5.0 M (15%) •Utilities $1.5 M •Affordable Housing $3.5 M (10%) •Other Improvements $3.4 M (10%) •Administrative $2.5 M (7%) •Interest $17.1 M (50%) •Total $34.0 Million Page 10 of TIF Plan Proposed TIF Plan –Sources and Uses The CITY ofEDINA 18 Phase 1 All site work, all public realm benefits and 7250 office -Demolition: 2022 -Site prep: 2023 –2024 -Construction 2023-2025 -Occupancy: 2025 Phase 2 -Entitlements by 2024 -Remove temp. parking by 2025 -Construction anticipated 2024-2027 -Occupancy anticipated 2027 Phase 2 7200 Pad Proposed TIF Plan-Phased Development 7250 The CITY ofEDINA 19 •Demolition and site prep • New site work •Streetscape and landscape •Public realm areas •Stormwater area • 7250 office building • 7200 site prep Phase 2 7200 pad Proposed TIF Plan-Phase 1 Conditions The CITY ofEDINA 20 •All Phase 1 elements remain •7200 Hotel or Multi-Family or similar Ph 2 massing concept Proposed TIF Plan-Phase 2 Conditions The CITY ofEDINA 21 51% of 4.9 acre site is subject to permanent easements -Public sidewalks -Public plaza -Public roadway, sidewalks and trail -Stormwater 7200 (Ph 2) 7250 (Ph 1) Proposed TIF Plan-New Public Realm The CITY ofEDINA 22 France Ave frontage looking south Public plaza looking east Gallagher frontage looking northNorth-south public drive and sidewalk looking north Proposed TIF Plan-New Public Realm The CITY ofEDINA 23 •Redevelop with modern facilities that create jobs and add vitality to Greater Southdale •Create north-south road and bike/pedestrian trail between Gallagher and 72nd St as alternate to France Avenue •-secured with permanent public easement •-privately constructed •-privately maintained Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: new north/south roadway and trail The CITY ofEDINA •Streetscape, lighting, sidewalks, landscaping along France, Gallagher & 72nd •Permanent public easements (16,000 sq ft) •Privately constructed and privately maintained •City will continue to remove snow on France Ave sidewalk •Allow future Metro Transit bus stops 24 Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: new public realm & sidewalks The CITY ofEDINA •15,000 sq ft public plaza •Two public art sculptures at eastern and western ends •Secured by public easement •Privately owned and maintained •Art selected with community input •$100,000+ budget •Additional art elements incorporated into building as shown in plans •Agreeable to host future rotating public art displays (funded by others) 25 Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: new public plaza and public art The CITY ofEDINA •Two new public gathering spaces •Adjacent to natural area / stormwater basin •Secured by public easement •Privately owned and maintained •Seating and streetscape elements 26 Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: new public gathering areas The CITY ofEDINA 27 •Create dedicated stormwater management area for shared use of commercial and surrounding residential parcels •-approx. 44,000 sq ft •-secured with permanent easements •-privately constructed •-privately maintained •Landscaped with native plantings to create natural area with low environmental impact Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: new shared stormwater management The CITY ofEDINA 28 •Compliance with Edina’s new Sustainability Policy •-upgrade to LEED Silver or equivalent •-Electric Vehicle chargers •-Solar ready rooftops •Stormwater management for multiple properties Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: enhanced sustainability features The CITY ofEDINA 29 •Goals to be identified for each Phase •-Portion of work awarded to qualified MBE and WBE companies •-Portion of total job hours filled by BIPOC •-Portion of total job hours filled by women •Good faith efforts required for each Phase •-Developer and contractors must make active efforts to achieve goals, monitor progress and report results •-Penalty only if no effort made Image Source: Commercial Construction and Renovation Proposed TIF Plan -Public benefits: efforts toward equity and diversity goals The CITY ofEDINA 30 The growth in “Tax Capacity” within the District exceeds the average growth in the City by 10x. Proposed TIF Plan-Fiscal evalution The CITY ofEDINAProposed TIF Plan-Fiscal evalution 31 In the long term, the property taxes collected from the site (even with TIF) is more than the property taxes collected from a smaller scale development without TIF. 2051 TIF District Expires -$2.8 MM Cumulative Difference 2054 Break Even Point+$860,000 Annual Taxes Thereafter 7200-7250 France Site Tax Base Comparisons Estimated Market Value x Increase Adj. Net Tax Capacity x Increase Existing Site 10,950,300 142,016 Concept 1: Small Scale Redevelopment 25,200,000 2.3 328,096 2.3 Concept 2: Orion Phase I and II 68,506,680 6.3 893,618 6.3 The CITY ofEDINA In Conclusion: it is not reasonably expected that the proposed development with public realm benefits will be constructed without the use of Tax Increment Financing. •Site qualifies as a Redevelopment TIF District •Site plan consistent with the City’s general plans for redevelopment •Project capable of delivering many public benefits that would not otherwise be delivered •High construction costs creates a financial gap that that hinders the delivery of the new buildings and the new public benefits •Adequate incremental taxes anticipated to be generated to allow the project to proceed 32Appendix C of the TIF Plan Proposed TIF Plan –Findings gap The CITY ofEDINA 33 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Resolution be approved and that the new 72nd and France 2 TIF District be established. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-26 & Ordinance No. 2023-05, Rezoning 4404 Valley View Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2023-26 and grant first reading of Ordinance No. 2023-05, approving the requested rezoning. INTRODUCTION: City Homes and the City of Edina are requesting a rezoning from PCD-1, P lanned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the property at 4404 Valley View Road. T his site received a Conditional Use Permit to allow the multiresidential land use. This property also was approved for a four-unit townhome/rowhome project in 2022. The purpose of this request is to rezone the property to the intended long-term use of the site, residential, and not allow commercial uses in the future. See previously approved site plan with variances for this site. The city attorney has advised that a rezoning to P UD would be the proper method to ensure no commercial uses. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning request. Vote: 9 Ayes and 0 Nays. The Commission further recommended approval of the subdivision request to allow the individual homes to be sold separately. T he Commission believes the approved project conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, Small Area Plan and the existing PCD-1 zoning through the approved conditional use permit, site plan and variances. Council is asked to take action on the request on April 4, as this action was recommended by the City Attorney during the March 7 consideration of the subdivision request. The approved development plans for this project are not impacted by this decision. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report - March 29, 2023 Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Approved Site Plan Resolution No. 2022-77 Approving Site Plan and Variances Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Ordinance No. 2023-05 Resolution No. 2023-26 (approval) Resolution No. 2023-26 (denial) Staff Presentation March 29, 2023 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Rezoning – 4404 Valley View Road Information / Background: City Homes and the City of Edina are requesting a rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the property at 4404 Valley View Road. This site received a Conditional Use Permit to allow the multiresidential land use in 2017, and in 2022 received Site Plan approval with variances to build a four-unit townhome/rowhome project. The purpose of this request is to rezone the property to the intended long-term use of the site, residential, and not allow commercial uses in the future. (See previously approved site plan with variances for this site.) The city attorney has advised that a rezoning to PUD would be the proper method to ensure no commercial uses. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A Rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Easterly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Southerly: Apartments; zoned PRD-4, and guided for High Density Residential Westerly: New Horizon Day Care; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District; and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 11,691 square feet in size. The site is vacant today. Previously located on the site was the Burly hair salon, and before that was gas station. According to the MPCA, this site had a petroleum leak discovered and reported in 2008. The owner at the time worked with the MPCA to clean the site and provide the necessary documentation. The MPCA considers the site cleared for development and they do not require any other documentation. MPCA stated the City of Edina can approve permits for construction on this site. Density of the approved project is 15 units per acre, which is an allowed density in the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan. (12-30 units per acre.) Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node Zoning: PCD-1, Planned Commercial District PUD Rezoning Per Chapter 36 of the City Code the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, STAFF REPORT Page 3 stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The purpose of the proposed rezoning is to permanently permit the residential land use as the only allowed use in the future. The approved townhome project will provide a more appropriate land use transition from the single-dwelling units to the north and east to the more commercial area at the Valley View and Wooddale intersection. The project will provide a housing type the City has not seen much development of, the “missing middle” type housing option identified in the Comprehensive Plan. “Examples of housing types may include “missing middle” housing options – a range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. Two of the guiding principles of the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan (SAP) are as follows: “Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands.” “Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node.” Additionally, the SAP specifically refers to this site as follows: “Flexible Evolution of Land Uses. Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to the market. Although the proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014, the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change. The commercial site north of Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. The Edina Village Market may redevelop as a mix of housing and STAFF REPORT Page 4 businesses. The sites east of Kellogg Avenue immediately north of Valley View Road may evolve as either commercial or residential land uses. The idea behind the building heights and land uses contemplated in the small area plan was to reduce impact on adjacent low density residential use and for residential land uses around the perimeter of the district, with the more intensive commercial uses toward the intersection of Valley View and Wooddale. This site is located on south east edge of the district, and the proposed rezoning would specifically not allow commercial use of the property. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Residential and multifamily residential as a primary use is allowable under the Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated as NN, Neighborhood Node in the Comprehensive Plan; description of those land uses states: “small to moderate-scale residential or mixed-use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood. Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood-serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential.” The use is currently allowed by conditional use permit in the PCD-1 District. As highlighted in #1 above, the Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan specifically refers to future development of this site as potentially evolving to housing. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposal would not include a mixture of land uses. As mentioned above, the use is acceptable in the Comprehensive Plan, and is a conditionally permitted use in the PCD- 1 zoning district. The intent is to not allow commercial uses as the primary use of the site. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; STAFF REPORT Page 5 As mentioned above, the proposal would not include a mixture of land uses; The use, multiresidential housing is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and conditionally permitted in the PCD-1 zoning district. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The building density would be 15 units per acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan allows between 12-30 units per acre. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The approved project for this site has already received variances from the PCD- 1 District standards. For the reasons stated above, staff believes the purpose and intend of the PUD Ordinance is met. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed rezoning would not allow traditional PCD-1 commercial land uses on the site. Concern was raised with the review of the Subdivision regarding the future use of the approved residential use on the site. The city attorney has advised that a rezoning to PUD would be the proper method to ensure no PCD-1 commercial uses. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning as outlined on pages 2-5 of the staff report. The approved townhome project would provide a more appropriate land use transition from the single-dwelling units to the north and east to the more commercial area at the Valley View and Wooddale intersection. The project will provide “missing middle” type housing option identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposal specifically addresses two of the guiding principles of the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan (SAP) are as follows: STAFF REPORT Page 6 “Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands.” “Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node.” Additionally, the SAP specifically refers to the site as follows: “Flexible Evolution of Land Uses. Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to the market. Although the proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014, the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change. The commercial site north of Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. The Edina Village Market may redevelop as a mix of housing and businesses. The sites east of Kellogg Avenue immediately north of Valley View Road may evolve as either commercial or residential land uses. 4. The approved site plan and use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as “Neighborhood Node.” The description of uses includes “small-to moderate scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings, serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood.” “Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential.” The building density would be 15 units per acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan allows between 12-30 units per acre. 5. The PUD rezoning ensures that the approved site with variances for the 4-unit row home development is the only development allowed on the site, unless the City Council approves an Ordinance Amendment that would allow a different development. Staff Recommendation Recommend the City Council approve the request for Preliminary & Final Rezoning to PUD- 25 Zoning District at 4404 Valley View Road. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning would not allow traditional PCD-1 commercial land uses on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD Rezoning outlined in Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The rezoning would codify the approved site plan with variances as being the only development allowed on the property, unless a zoning ordinance amendment is granted by the City Council. STAFF REPORT Page 7 4. The project will provide missing middle housing. 5. The proposal specifically addresses two of the guiding principles of the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan (SAP) are as follows: Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands. Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node. Additionally, the SAP specifically refers to the site as follows: The approved site plan and use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as “Neighborhood Node.” The description of uses includes “small-to moderate scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings, serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood.” “Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential.” The building density would be 15 units per acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan allows between 12-30 units per acre. 6. Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the site. 7. Will not result in an overly intensive land use. Conditional Use Permit for the use, and Site Plan with Variances have already been approved for the site. 8. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The site must be developed per the approved development plans dated June 27, 2022 approved by the City on September 7, 2022 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2022-72 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must be consistent with the approved landscape plan dated June 27, 2022. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. All the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2022-72 approving the site plan with variances must be met. Deadline for a City decision: April 18, 2023 EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site EdinaMN.gov 4 Site EdinaMN.gov 5 Site West Unit 1 West Unit 2 East Unit 2 East Unit 1 Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Concrete DrivewayConcrete Driveway Concrete Driveway Existing Home (4) S M Spirea (3) Pyr Arborvitae s i m p l y h o m e s i n c Oaklawn Avenue0 5 10 20 (6) A F Dogwood Perennial Bed Typical at Front Entrances (1) American Linden (Basswood) (1) American Linden (Basswood) (1) P Elm (1) H W Maple (2) Colorado Blue Spruce (3) Colorado Blue Spruce (1) P F Crab (8) Pyr Arborvitae (3) S M Spirea (2) P F Crab Modular Block Retaining Wall @ West and North Property Line Typical Building Base Planting: Bark or stone bed w/mixed low height plantings Notes to Drawing: 1.All areas shall be sodded unless noted otherwise 2.Provide root barrier at paving, building edges and utilities when trees within 5’ 3.All lawn and landscape areas shall be irrigated with fully functional irrigation system (1) P Elm (10) S M Spirea (12) Pyr Arborvitae (7) P G Aspen s i m p l y h o m e s i n c Maintenance Edge Shovel Cut Modular Block Wall Deciduous Tree Planting Shrub and Groundcover Planting TOWNHOMEPROPOSEDTOWNHOMEPROPOSEDC1Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-796417917 Highway No. 7Web: www.advsur.comAdvanceSurveying & Engineering, Co.CITY HOMES4404 VALLEY VIEW RD.CLIENT/JOB ADDRESSEDINA, MNSHEET TITLEPROPOSED SITE PLANSHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 6DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE220782 JRDRAWING NUMBERJUNE 13, 2022DRAFTED DATE:SHEET SIZE: 22 X 34LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiarwith your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review ourproposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify thatthey match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar withlocal codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in thiscommunity are. Be sure to show this site plan to said officials, or any other officialsthat may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvalsbefore beginning construction or planning improvements to the property.2.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, aretaken from the siding and or stucco of the building.3.While we show the building setback lines per the City of Edina web site, we suggestyou show this site plan to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback linesare shown correctly. Do this BEFORE you use this site plan to design anything for thisproperty.20'10'01 INCH = 10 FEETAPRIL 25, 2022DATE SURVEYED:SURVEYED BY:WAYNE W. PREUS, PLS. #43503ADVANCE SURVEYING. & ENG., CO.#LICENSE NO.DATEJUNE 13, 2022# 52716Joshua S. RinkePROPOSED HARDCOVERWEST UNITS (WITH CANT.) 2,550 SQ. FT.WEST WALKS/STOOPS 196 SQ. FT.WEST DRIVEWAY 684 SQ. FT.WEST AC PADS 13 SQ. FT.EAST UNITS 2,842 SQ. FT.EAST WALKS/STOOPS 164 SQ. FT.EAST DRIVEWAYS 995 SQ. FT.EAST AC PADS 13 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 7,457 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 11,307 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 65.9% PRELIMINARY (SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON HENN. CO. PLAT CHECKING) Wooddale Valley View SMALL AREA PLAN Published March 19, 2015 *See Resolutions 2017-102 and 2018-26 which reflect a comprehensive plan amendment and a rezoning to properties that are now within the Wooddale & Valley View SAP* Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan City Council Members James Hovland Mayor Kevin Staunton Bob Stewart Mary Brindle Ann Swenson City Planning Commission Members Michael Platteter Chair Claudia Carr Vice-Chair Arlene Forrest* Steven Hobbs Susan Lee* Ian Nemerov Jo Ann Olsen Gerard Strauss Todd Thorsen Taylor Halva Student Madison Seeley Student (* - co-liaisons to Small Area Planning Team) Small Area Planning Team Members (Volunteer) Arlene Forrest Co-Chair Susan Lee Co-Chair Rob Burley Connie Carrino Brian Durst Carrie Fordahl Rita Paris Jim Schedin City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424 Karen Kurt Assistant City Manager kkurt@EdinaMN.gov Cary Teague Community Development Director cteague@EdinaMN.gov Lindy Crawford City Management Fellow lcrawford@EdinaMN.gov Consulting Team Members Peter Musty (consultant lead) PETER MUSTY LLC Minneapolis William Weber Weber Community Planning St Louis Park William Smith Biko Associates, Inc. Minneapolis Joe Hollman Maxfield Research Minneapolis Janna King Economic Development Services Roseville Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose 1.2 The Study Area 1.3 Community Engagement and Planning Process 1.4 Major Planning Issues 1.5 Guiding Principles Chapter 2 Demographic and Market Profile ....................................................... 13 2.1 Demographic Characteristics 2.2 Real Estate Market Conditions Chapter 3 Economic Vitality ........................................................................................ 19 3.1 Current Conditions ........................................................................................... 20 3.2 Trends and Challenges ...................................................................................... 21 3.3 Goals and Policies ............................................................................................. 24 3.4 Implementation Steps ...................................................................................... 26 Chapter 4 Land Use and Community Design ....................................................... 27 4.1 Current Conditions ........................................................................................... 28 4.2 Trends and Challenges ..................................................................................... 29 4.3 Goals and Policies ............................................................................................ 30 Goals ....................................................................................................... …….30 Policies ..................................................................................................... …….31 Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN) .............................. …….32 Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines .......................................... …….34 Building Height Limits Plan ................................................................... …….34 Building Frontage Guidelines ............................................................... …….36 Gathering Space Guidelines ................................................................ …….39 Site-Specific Guidelines ....................................................................... …….41 Corner Properties at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road.......... 42 Fairfax Avenue and West 61st Street (South Side) ............................. 43 City-owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road .................. 44 Eastern Gateway - Oaklawn Ave., West 62nd St., Valley View Road. . 48 General Guidelines for the Entire Study Area ...................................... …….50 On-Site Parking and Site Access ......................................................... 50 Other Improvements ........................................................................ 50 Heritage Preservation ....................................................................... 51 4.4 Implementation Steps ..................................................................................... 52 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan i | Page Chapter 5 Transportation and Street Design ..................................................... 53 5.1 Current Conditions ........................................................................................... 54 5.2 Trends and Challenges ...................................................................................... 58 5.3 Goals and Policies ............................................................................................ 61 5.4 Implementation Steps ..................................................................................... 69 EdinaMN.gov/WVV Project Archive In addition to materials and documents from the community process, the webpage includes: •Community Generated List of Identified Issues •Community Engagement Plan •Report on Demographic Profile and Market Trends •Summary of Business Owner and Property Owner Opinion •Land Use and Community Design – Discovery Materials •Transportation and Street Design - Discovery Materials •Original High Resolution PDFs: o Figure 4.4 Building Frontage Guidelines o Figure 4.9 Site Capacity Alternatives: City-Owned Site o Figure 4.11 Eastern Gateway Design Study ii | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan List of Figures Figure 1.1 Wooddale Valley View Planning Process ....................................................... 5 Figure 1.2 The Study Area ............................................................................................... 6 Figure 1.3 City of Edina Small Area Plan Roles ................................................................ 7 Figure 2.1 Wooddale Valley View’s Primary Market Area and Retail Trade Area ........ 16 Figure 4.1 Existing Properties: Building Types, Year Built and Current Land Uses ........ 28 Figure 4.2 Preferred Land Use Plan ............................................................................... 32 Figure 4.3 Building Height Limits Plan ........................................................................... 35 Figure 4.3b Building Height Limits: Existing Zoning Overlay .......................................... 35 Figure 4.4 Building Frontage Guidelines ....................................................................... 37 Figure 4.5 Building Frontage Guidelines: Street Context Areas .................................... 38 Figure 4.6 Illustration of Public Space Guidelines for the Northwest Corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road .................................................... 40 Figure 4.7 Key Map of Site-Specific Guidelines (Sites A-D) ........................................... 41 Figure 4.8 Assembly Options for the City-Owned Site .................................................. 45 Figure 4.9 Three Alternatives for Properties A+B: City-Owned Site ............................. 46 Figure 4.10 Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A + B as “Flex Commercial” ....... 47 Figure 4.11 Eastern Gateway Design Study ..................................................................... 49 Figure 5.1 Wooddale Avenue: Existing Conditions ....................................................... 55 Figure 5.2 Valley View Road: Existing Conditions .......................................................... 56 Figure 5.3 Valley View Road: Illustrative of Long-Range Policy .................................... 63 Figure 5.4 Alternative #3; Oak Lawn, 62nd and Valley View Intersection Study ........... 64 Figure 5.5 Wooddale Avenue: Illustrative of Long-Range Policy .................................. 65 Figure 5.6 Public Realm Improvements ........................................................................ 68 List of Tables Table 3A Comparable Traffic Counts ............................................................................ 23 Table 3B Implementation Steps for Economic Vitality ................................................ 26 Table 4A Description of Neighborhood Node Land Use Category .............................. 33 Table 4B Implementation Steps for Land Use and Community Design ....................... 52 Table 5A Historical and Forecast Daily Traffic Volumes .............................................. 58 Table 5B Implementation Steps for Transportation and Street Design ...................... 69 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan iii | Page Executive Summary Historical Development of the Wooddale Valley View Node From cows to cars and convenience to commerce, the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road has long been an important commercial crossroads in Edina’s history and development. It is a classic glimpse at post-World War II development. Farms dominated the area for over 60 years until owners began selling plots and parcels to first-time home buyers or developers. There is, however, an important distinction about the four-corners of Wooddale and Valley View: single-family homes followed commercial development. The Wooddale and Valley View neighborhood commercial node emerged as such because of its location and history as a trading center. The Native Americans followed Valley View from Ft. Snelling to Shakopee, hunting and trading along the way; the two roads provided important transportation connections, and one of the area’s first corner grocery stores served the once-rural area for decades. Yet, as work began on this plan, not much had changed in the node since its heyday of 1950s and 1960s commercial development. Purpose of the Plan The purpose of Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan is to provide a long range decision-making framework including principles, goals, policies, development guidelines and implementation steps. The study area includes the streets and the commercial and higher density residential properties near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. The entire plan is written and formatted to be suitable for adoption as an amendment to the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Community Engagement and Planning Process A community engagement process ensured the consideration of input from various stakeholders including business owners and residents - while recognizing the rights of current and future land owners. The plan evolved as a balanced framework for renewed attention - and as importantly - new investments by both the public and private sectors. The plan strikes a sustainable balance, allowing the real estate market to find the right land use mix while protecting the character of surrounding neighborhoods. Vision for Vitality There exists a simple but strong community desire to nurture vitality at Wooddale Valley View. The Wooddale and Valley View intersection is situated at an important crossroads within the City of Edina. The node offers the potential to foster a sense of community by connecting the local community with specialized services, boutique products, gathering/meeting facilities, spaces for small business, and needed living options for Edina residents. Well-designed investments in streets, existing properties and in redevelopment projects will catalyze broader investment. The following pages contain key highlights of the plan: Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan iv | Page Guiding Principles The small area plan is organized around ten guiding principles that came out of a significant community engagement process and individual public workshops. Participants identified key issues and concerns which were then organized into the following principles: •Place. The Study Area should be recognizable as a place and visually attractive. •Gathering. There should be a places for people to spend leisure time, whether in a commercial or public locations. •Neighborhood Businesses. There should be businesses that provide services or goods desired in the neighborhood, including small offices. The amount and configuration of commercial space should be allowed to adjust in response to the market. Property owners are encouraged to keep their properties economically viable and attractive. •Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands. •Height and Size of Buildings. Future buildings north of Valley View Road should be one to three stories tall depending on their location relative to nearby single family housing. Properties in sloping topography on the south side of Valley View Rd should be allowed to be four stories. •Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node. •Parking. Most residential parking should be in attached garages or under the building. Views to commercial parking should be softened by plantings, walls or fences. •Street Edges. Buildings should be located near the street sidewalk without intervening parking. There should be trees between the curb and the sidewalk. •Circulation and Connections. Walking, bicycling or catching the bus in the Study Area should be safe and comfortable. The Study Area should be well-linked to the nearby neighborhoods. •Role of the City. The City should provide a land use plan, zoning regulations, design guidelines and public improvements that support the intentions of the property owners and the broader community while being sufficiently flexible to guide alternative ideas. Economic Vitality The economic development focus of the small area plan was on identifying ways to strengthen the existing businesses while setting in place a future plan for the transition of the commercial node while maintaining its economic vitality. It was evident that the area is currently undergoing change and retail businesses at one time played a more Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan v | Page significant role that they do today. Residents clearly expressed a preference to maintain and build upon the retail aspects of the node. Market data indicated the following: •Modest growth is projected for population and households. Current households are affluent with respect to metro area averages. •Small neighborhood business can thrive in the area but they will have to offer specialized services that cater to nearby residents. There is limited demand for additional retail space. •There is demand for new housing in the area, particularly for active adult senior housing and multi-family homes. The pace of private development is often unpredictable and the City has limited means at its disposal to influence outcomes and timeframes. Setting some general goals that emphasize economic vitality will position the area for a smoother transition into the future. These can be summarized as follows: •Neighborhood Hub Cultivate the Wooddale Valley View node as a hub of vitality with a mix of high quality neighborhood-serving businesses. Support investments that encourage gathering, pedestrian activity and that reinforce a “neighborhood feel”. •Short-term Revitalization Support upgrades to existing properties through improved tenant mix and image, better marketing and promotion. •Right-Sized Retail and Commercial Spaces Encourage and support an amount and range of spaces for businesses that is calibrated to the realities of the market and trade area. •Long-Range Market Forces Encourage redevelopment of aging commercial properties and development of vacant land based on market forces. The City also has a key role to play in its support of future private development. Although almost all property within the node is under private ownership, the following policy recommendations will help to bring about greater growth in economic vitality: •The City will encourage redevelopment driven by the private sector that aligns with the principles, goals, policies and guidelines of this plan. •The City will invest in public improvements and/or use established financing tools to support and encourage redevelopment of the neighborhood commercial node consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. •The City will favor investments in neighborhood-serving retail, service sector businesses and neighborhood-oriented public spaces. •The City will be supportive of collaborations both formal or informal business and property owner collaborations. •Options for the City-owned property at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road will be discussed with adjacent land-owners. vi | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Land Use and Community Design Land use in the Wooddale Valley View Node is expected to evolve but retain a mixed use profile of small commercial, office and residential uses into the future. The small area plan introduced and recommended a new land use category, the Neighborhood Node (NN) to replace the existing Neighborhood Commercial (NC) designation. The NN designation has a more intentional emphasis on the intertwining of new alternative housing units such as row houses and townhomes, landscaped open gathering spaces and pedestrian and bike friendly planning and design. Design goals included the following: •Activation of the Core Concentrate activity and neighborhood-serving commercial businesses near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. •Building-to-Street Relationships Ensure that ground-level frontages address public rights-of way so as to encourage beauty, safety, walkability and a sense of place. •Graceful Transitions Encourage the scale of buildings to transition from center to edge of the Neighborhood Node, with the largest buildings located near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, decreasing in scale toward the surrounding single- family neighborhood. Ensure that redevelopment near single-family homes is designed sensitively. •Flexible Evolution of Land Uses Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to the market. Although the proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014, the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change. The commercial site north of Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. The Edina Village Market may redevelop as a mix of housing and businesses. The sites east of Kellogg Avenue immediately north of Valley View Road may evolve as either commercial or residential land uses. •Drive-Through Formats Discourage buildings with drive-through elements such as gasoline stations and those with drive-up windows. The City's role in shaping land use policy will take place via several implementation steps. These steps include the adoption of amendments to the current zoning ordinance that incorporate new building height limits, new building frontage design guidelines, gathering space guidelines, node to neighborhood transitions and site specific guidelines. Development Guidelines As proposals for new development are brought forth for review by the City, applications and designs should be evaluated according to the new Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines that are presented in the plan. The guidelines contain five sections: A.Building Height Limits Plan Height Limits Near the Center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley View Road, building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan vii | Page Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important (as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet. B.Building Frontage Guidelines Building-to-Street Relationships. Guidelines describing preferred relationships of buildings to streets establish a sense of place, provide a graceful visual transition from busy areas to nearby housing, and ensure that the pedestrian experience is pleasant. Node-to-Neighborhood Transitions. Typical configurations of street-to-building relationships are described in the small area plan and keyed on a map to their appropriate neighborhood context within the Neighborhood Node. C.Gathering Space Guidelines Introducing small landscaped open spaces and a larger public multi-use gathering space should be introduced strategically throughout the Neighborhood Node and will help to support pedestrian movement and visual identity. Suitable locations are identified in the plan. D.Site Specific Guidelines Site specific guidelines are outlined for the following: •Corner Properties at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road •Fairfax Avenue and West 61st Street •City-owned site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road •The Eastern Gateway - Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue and West 62nd Street E.General Guidelines for the Entire Neighborhood Node Parking will be a constant issue within the Neighborhood Node for businesses, residents and customers alike. The plan recommends ways to include parking yet minimize the visual impact while strengthening the visual identity of the node through plant screenings and consistent signage. Enhancements to pedestrian and bicycle networks such as additional sidewalks, consistent lighting and bike parking facilities will improve the pedestrian experience for residents and visitors. This in turn, helps to create a more attractive work and retail destination for area businesses.Transportation and Street Design As was evident during the planning process, the City and residents desired to have the Neighborhood Node become more pedestrian and bicycle friendly as well as transit- oriented. This must take place within the context of Valley View Road, Wooddale Avenue and 62nd Street all being classified as Municipal State Aid streets, which serve as connectors to Highway 62 and Highway 100. The City should consider the following future improvements: •Automobile Traffic Ensure safe and convenient travel for traffic passing through and within the Study Area by: Reducing lane widths viii | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Implementing intersection improvements at problem locations such as 62nd St., Oaklawn and Valley View Limiting the number of driveways providing access between the roadway system and private property Vigorously enforcing traffic laws and regulations •Parking Ensure adequate parking supplies that: Are located on-site in accordance with specific land uses Meet multi-modal parking needs Are safe and secure •Walking, Biking and Transit Use Design public rights-of-way to facilitate and encourage safe and convenient multi-modal travel by providing: Sidewalks, boulevards, marked crosswalks, and pedestrian-oriented street lighting within the Study Area Dedicated bikeways within the Study Area Connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists to surrounding neighborhoods Transit stops Living Streets principles and other established best practices in all infrastructure improvementsImplementation The end of Chapter 3- Economic Vitality, Chapter 4- Land Use and Community Design, and Chapter 5- Transportation and Street Design contain a Table of Implementation Steps to phase in the various plan recommendations. Most steps anticipate a 1-3 year time frame, coinciding with the Comprehensive Plan Update scheduled for 2018. Therefore, it is recommended by the Small Area Planning Team that the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan be adopted now by the City Council as an amendment to the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan, giving it immediate authority equal to the balance of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies and guidelines regarding the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node will then be adjusted in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan to reflect these changes. Conclusion Clearly, Wooddale Valley View stakeholders hope for a thriving and vital commercial node. They are concerned about the aging properties, retail turnover and, ultimately, the future of the node. This plan helps to shape those concerns and issues into suggestions and solutions. Throughout the process various opinions were offered and shared with the WVV-SAP team and, in turn, all perspectives were considered in defining a vision, synthesizing the market data and prioritizing the recommendations. The WVV-SAP team would like to thank the residents, business and property owners who participated in the process by providing comments, input, feedback and resources. We would also like to thank Marci Matson and Frank Cardarelle of the Edina Historical Society for providing background and photos on the area. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan ix | Page Chapter 1 - Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction Purpose 1.1 The Study Area 1.2 Community Engagement and Planning Process 1.3 Major Planning Issues 1.4 Guiding Principles 1.5 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page| 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.1 Purpose The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan (WVVSAP) is intended to be adopted as an addendum to the current Edina Comprehensive Plan. Small area plans outline a community vision to be implemented over an extended period of time. Small area plans do not guarantee that, what, when or how redevelopment will occur. The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan provides detailed guidance in the areas of economic vitality, land use, community design, transportation and street design. Topics not covered under the Small Area Plan revert to the Comprehensive Plan. Why the Small Area Plan was Developed The Wooddale Valley View neighborhood commercial node was first identified in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan as an area of potential change. In 2014, the City Council directed the Planning Commission and City Community Development Staff to undertake a small area planning process that would 1) seek to provide the template for future small area plans and 2) provide proactive guidance for shaping future development in the form of a small area plan for the Wooddale Valley View neighborhood node. This plan represents a collaborative nine month effort by a diverse and interdisciplinary team of staff, consultants and committed community volunteers. Efforts were made to balance the concerns and values of Wooddale Valley View’s residents, landowners, and other stakeholders with the parameters set by physical conditions on the ground, Edina’s historic and economic context, and an awareness of emerging trends in the local and regional real estate market. This plan creates a long range decision-making, planning and design framework that allows existing assets to thrive while needed new investments are introduced in a carefully planned and sensitively designed manner. The plan is balanced; while it provides strong guidelines for transitions to surrounding neighborhoods, the plan maintains real estate market flexibility for Wooddale Valley View’s businesses and investors. There exists a simple but strong community desire to nurture vitality at Wooddale Valley View. Page| 2 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 1 - Introduction How the Small Area Plan will be Used The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan serves as an important tool for landowners, developers, city planners, city council members and planning commission members when evaluating future development projects. In addition, the Plan outlines specific action steps for the City and other stakeholders to support the long term vision for the area. Developers and landowners will find the plan useful when conceptualizing and preparing development plans for implementation in the Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan study area. Reviewing the Small Area Plan during the early stages of project development will inform developers of City-adopted directions, standards and guidelines and will ultimately prove to be a time- and resource- saving measure that can streamline the development review process. City staff will find the plan to be a useful tool when explaining and illustrating City-adopted directions, standards, and guidelines to developers. They will then be able to use the plan’s principles, goals, and policies to assess and evaluate the degree to which developers’ plans adhere to City directions and the impact of variances developers might seek. The Planning Commission will use the plan when deciding whether to approve development proposals and pass them along to the City Council for adoption. How the Small Area Plan is Structured The Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan is organized similar to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan includes: •Major Issues •Guiding Principles •Goals, Policies and Guidelines •Implementation Steps The plan was developed through an iterative process beginning with input from community members at a kickoff meeting that was held in June 2014. In addition to community members, others involved in the process were a Small Area Planning Team, appointed by the Planning Commission; City staff; and a consultant team. The iterative nature of the process permitted conclusions reached in one phase of the Small Area Plan study to be re-visited and discussed by each of the participants and, if necessary, revised to take new ideas and new information into account. Issues. One of the first products developed in the process was a list of five major issues, which were synthesized from over one hundred issues identified by Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page| 3 Chapter 1 - Introduction community members. Analysis of the major issues led to the development of 12 Guiding Principles, which respond to the issues as a realm of development and design guidance representing an “ideal” situation. The list of major issues also helped direct the development of the three primary plan chapters: •Economic Vitality •Land Use and Community Design •Transportation and Street Design Guiding Principles. The Guiding Principles were vetted by all participants in the process at the Dream (Visioning) Workshop that was held in December 2014. Consideration of the high level Guiding Principles for each of the plan’s three primary plan chapters (Economic Vitality, Land Use and Community design, and Transportation and Street Design) led to the development of more practical chapter-specific goals. Goals. The goals that were developed for each of the three final plan chapters identify future ambitions and desires, specifically focused on the resolution of chapter-specific issues. Policies. Policies for each of the three plan policy chapters were developed following the development of issue-focused goals. The policies, also issue- focused, are statements that are intended guide decisions and achieve rational outcomes, typically written as direction for City staff, Planning Commission or City Council. They are statements of intent to be implemented as a procedure or protocol. In the case of the Small Area Plan’s three final plan chapters, the policies firmly state what the City will do to address the element-specific issues. Guidelines. Policies in some cases often include even more specific guidelines that communicate framework of preferences and parameters for decisions from district wide issues to a specific property or street design issues. Implementation Steps. The final product presented in each of the three final plan chapters is a table of implementation steps, which identifies actions the City will take, the agency within the City that will lead, and the timeframe for acting. Figure 1.1 on the following page shows how input from community members contributed direction and substance to the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan’s three major outcomes; Goals, Policies and Implementation Steps. Page| 4 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 1 - Introduction From Issues to Implementation The Wooddale Valley View Model Figure 1.1 Wooddale Valley View Planning Process Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page| 5 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.2 The Study Area Having always been a historical crossroad of commerce, the intersection of Wooddale Road and Valley View Road has seen many changes through the years. As the population of Edina grew, the surrounding neighborhoods expanded and matured. The road system was revised, altering the types of services and businesses that came to occupy the once busy corner. The area of study addressed during the planning process included the public street rights-of-way and several land parcels in the immediate vicinity of the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Figure. 1.2 shows the Study Area with a dotted white line. Included are areas designated in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan as ‘Neighborhood Commercial (NC)’ as well as adjacent ‘High Density Residential (HDR)’. The vast majority of the recommendations in this plan document address issues within this approximate area of study. However, where practical, some connections, impacts, relationships and transitions to areas immediately adjacent or close-by were also studied and addressed in this plan. Study Area Figure 2.2 The Study Area (showing Future Land Use Plan designations as Approved in 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan) Page| 6 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan See Resolutions 2017-102& 2018-26 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.3 Community Engagement and Planning Process The planning process was conducted from June, 2014 through February, 2015. As will be discussed, community engagement was the cornerstone of the Wooddale/ Valley View Small Area Plan planning process, and many opportunities were given to community members to express their opinions and identify issues and concerns about the Study Area. Milestone events during the process included: Community Kickoff - June 2014 In June of 2014, over 70 community members turned out for an orientation presentation and discussion about the upcoming Small Area Plan process. The Kickoff meeting gave community members an opportunity to identify their concerns about the Study Area. Consultant Request for Information (Request for Proposal) - June 2014 Edina City Staff released a Request for Information to find a Consultant Team to plan and lead community engagement events, conduct research and develop and write the Small Area Plan document. Small Area Planning Team (SAPT) Convened - June 2014 With assistance from City staff, a working group of community volunteers including business owners, residents and Edina Planning Commission representatives were appointed by the Edina Planning Commission to guide the planning process. Their first meeting was in July of 2014. The Small Area Planning Team (SAPT) selected a Consultant Team, through a competitive proposal process that included interviews. Figure 1.3 City of Edina Small Area Plan Roles Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page| 7 Chapter 1 - Introduction Consultant Team Research Background information on the Study Area was collected and in some cases developed by the Consultant Team, including: •Demographic and Real Estate Market Profile •Retail visibility •Experiential analysis of context: transitions from node to neighborhood •Typical frontage types (typical building to street relationships) •Building type, height, square footage and year of construction •Vehicle and bike parking counts •Traffic projections •Urban design characteristics •Sustainability weaknesses and opportunities •Nearby community facilities •Connections to surrounding neighborhoods and open spaces •Streetscape conditions •Historic imagery, related informal analysis, and development of interesting historic aspects and timelines •Existing zoning and development review process •Photography of the node/context Community Engagement Plan Development - September 2014 A formal Community Engagement Plan was developed by the Consultant Team that outlined interactive events during each of three major phases of the planning process: 1) Discovery, 2) Vision and 3) Plan Development. It was reviewed and revised as deemed appropriate with the SAPT. Parallel outreach and events subcommittees were formed by the SAPT to assist the Consultant Team with implementation of the community engagement plan. Community Outreach - September 2014 – December 2014 A website posting project information was updated throughout the process by Edina City Staff, who also utilized the Speak Up, Edina! web-based discussion forum to encourage online discussion of key issues. Information was published via posters, postcards, NextDoor and CityExtra. On separate occasions, the Consultant Team leader and an SAPT member visited the monthly neighborhood meetings of the Pamela Park and the Concord Neighborhood Associations. They informed the neighborhood groups about the reason for the planning process and the benefits of participating. They obtained from each group a list of issues that those present felt were relevant and important to address. Page| 8 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 1 - Introduction Key Stakeholder Interviews and Business Owner Survey – September/October 2014 Structured interviews were conducted by the Consultant Team with five property owners, leasing agent for the Edina Village Market, and Gordon Hughes, a long-serving, former city manager of the City of Edina. In addition, six businesses completed a survey that assisted the Consulting Team in defining the Study Area’s trade area and also provided business owners an opportunity to offer insights into the node’s strengths and challenges. The interviews focused on business-related conditions and future expectations. Discovery Workshop – October 11, 2014 The first event conducted by the newly assembled team of Consultants, City Staff and SAPT was held on Saturday morning, October 11, 2014. The event was held at the Edina Village Market in an empty storefront space. The session included breakfast, a presentation featuring key points in the history of the node, and a consultant-led exercise called a discovery walk-about where teams were given the tasks of touring the Study Area together to identify issues. Following the walk-about, the teams discussed their issues in a workshop. Dream (Visioning) Workshop – November 8, 2014 The Dream Workshop was held at the Edina Senior Center on a Saturday morning. The workshop included: •Presentations by the Consultant Team on five Major Planning Issues and a set of Organizing Principles drawn from community input •Update on progress of consultant discovery work, including an explanation of demographic and market trends and a summary of current attitudes in the business community •Interactive review of a Map of Potential Public Realm Improvements and a set of long range scenarios for revitalization and redevelopment reflecting both future market trends and the draft Organizing Principles Community members document issues during the Discovery Walk-About. Small Area Plan: Wooddale - Valley View Neighborhood Node 9 | Page Chapter 1 - Introduction Progress Update – December 3, 2014 A Progress Update session was held at the Edina Senior Center where a draft policy framework, the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Core Elements, was presented by the Consultant Team. The presentation was followed by conversations between Consultant Team members and community members. SAPT members also listened and recorded community member comments on the following boards that were on display: • Draft Land Use and Built Form Plan • Draft Building Frontage Guidelines • Capacity Study: City Owned Site at Valley View Road at Kellogg Avenue • Draft Public (Gathering) Space Guidelines • Design Study: Public (Gathering) Space at Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue • Design Study: East Gateway Redevelopment Concept (Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue) • Draft Map of Public Realm Improvements • Various Intersection Improvement Studies: for Intersection at Valley View Road, W. 62nd St and Oaklawn Avenue Neighborhood residents and City staff members critiqued a rendering for the possible plaza near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road at the December 3 meeting. 10 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.4 Major Planning Issues One of the community engagement tools used during the Discovery Workshop (held on October 11, 2014), at the neighborhood outreach meetings, and by SAPT members, was an exercise that challenged community members to identify issues in the form of questions. Individuals were invited to address issues ranging from more specific physical conditions and design preferences to broader economic and planning issues. The intent was to 1) help city staff, the Consultant Team and the SAPT better understand community attitudes, values and ideas about the Study Area and 2) provide a framework for the development of guiding principles, which would be used to define goals, policies and implementation steps for the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. Below are the five major planning issues that emerged from the milestone community engagement activities previously described. The five issues were synthesized from an initial list of over one hundred that were developed and submitted by community members and stakeholders: Economic Vitality What, if any, public or private actions should be taken to revitalize the Study Area in its current form? Long Range Land Use What are the viable long range patterns of land use in the Study Area? Built Form Guidance What should be the physical parameters for development of each site in the Study Area? Pedestrian Experience What should be done to improve the experience of walking, bicycling or riding the bus? Placemaking What should be done, if anything, to improve the Study Area’s identity or sense of “place”? Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 11 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.5 Guiding Principles These principles, which were mentioned on the previous two pages, were initially drafted by the Consultant Team during preparation of six long range scenarios following the Discovery Workshop. The principles were vetted by the community at the Dream Workshop along with scenarios and a list of public realm improvements. They were subsequently revised by the Consultant Team and approved by the SAPT. These principles steered the preparation of the goals, policies and implementation steps in Chapters 3-5 of this plan, and should be used by the City in the review of development and redevelopment proposals and plans within the Study Area. Place. The Study Area should be recognizable as a place and visually attractive. Gathering. There should be a places for people to spend leisure time, whether in a commercial or public locations. Neighborhood Businesses. There should be businesses that provide services or goods desired in the neighborhood, including small offices. The amount and configuration of commercial space should be allowed to adjust in response to the market. Property owners are encouraged to keep their properties economically viable and attractive. Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands. Height and Size of Buildings. Future buildings north of Valley View Road should be one to three stories tall depending on their location relative to nearby single family housing. Properties in sloping topography on the south side of Valley View Rd should be allowed to be four stories. Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node. Parking. Most residential parking should be in attached garages or under the building. Views to commercial parking should be softened by plantings, walls or fences. Street Edges. Buildings should be located near the street sidewalk without intervening parking. There should be trees between the curb and the sidewalk. Circulation and Connections. Walking, bicycling or catching the bus in the Study Area should be safe and comfortable. The Study Area should be well-linked to the nearby neighborhoods. Role of the City. The City should provide a land use plan, zoning regulations, design guidelines and public improvements that support the intentions of the property owners and the broader community while being sufficiently flexible to guide alternative ideas. 12 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 1 - Introduction Chapter 2 Demographic and Market Profile Demographic Characteristics 2.1 Real Estate Market Conditions 2.2 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 13 Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile 2.1 Demographic Characteristics The planning process included an analysis by the Consultant Team of demographic characteristics at various scales of context including the larger region, Edina, the Primary Market Area (PMA) and the Retail Trade Area (RTA). See following page for definitions. It included population and household growth trends and projections, age distribution, household income projections by age of householder, household tenure trends by age of householder, shifts in household type, employment growth trends and projections, and the commuting patterns of residents and workers. The following are the major findings: •There is an aging population. The greatest growth in both the Retail Trade Area and the Primary Market Area is expected among the 55+ age group (particularly 65 to 74). Projected household growth among this group (empty nesters) in the RTA will generate increasing demand for multifamily housing, predominately from married- couple households with adult children seeking to downsize after their children move out of the home. •There is an influx of younger / married couples with children. Edina and the Retail Trade Area are gaining married couple households with children. By contrast, the rest of the larger Primary Market Area is losing married couple households with children. The Retail Trade Area is also expected to experience growth in the Echo Boom population (25 to 34), while the PMA experiences growth in the 35 to 44 age group. The Primary Market Area overall is gaining single-person and single-parent households. •There is continued growth of affluent households. Median household income ($137,992) in the Retail Trade Area is more than double the Metro area ($66,599). Median household income in the Primary Market Area ($71,285) is seven percent higher than the Metro Area. The median household income in the RTA is projected to grow 4.8% per year (2014 to 2020) compared to a 3.7% annual rate of growth in the PMA and the Metro Area. Solid growth is anticipated in the upper-income brackets, which likely will translate to increasing demand for dining, home furnishings, specialty apparel, recreation, and luxury items. •Solid job growth is occurring. Edina gained 1,700 jobs (+3.6 percent) between 2010 and 2013, led by growth in industries that occupy office-space. Job growth is projected to continue. Commuting patterns create an opportunity for retailers to capture sales from the daytime population in the Retail Trade Area. 14 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile Defining Wooddale Valley View’s Primary Market Area and Retail Trade Area Figure 2.1 illustrates the larger Primary Market Area (shown in blue) used in the analysis of current demographic characteristics and for analysis of housing market conditions and trends. The Primary Market Area (i.e. trade area, draw area) is the geographic area from which between 70% and 80% of a housing project’s customer base (renters, home buyers, etc.) come. This is communicated as a boundary map of Census Tracts surrounding the Study Area. Because of traffic volumes and visibility of the Study Area, it was concluded that the draw area for commercial and retail goods and services will be neighborhood-oriented and will be smaller than the Primary Market Area for housing. As such a Retail Trade Area submarket (shown in dark blue) was established as the primary draw area for commercial/retail uses at Wooddale Valley View. Determination of the boundaries of the Primary Market Area and Retail Trade Areas is based on several factors, including: • Growth trends and demographic characteristics of the surrounding area; • Traffic and community orientation patterns; • Geographic and man-made barriers; • Places of employment; • Renter leasing patterns; • Discussions with Study Area business and property owners; Note: Both of these boundaries are larger than the project Study Area defined previously in this plan. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 15 Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile N Primary Market Area RetailTrade Area Study Area Source: Maxfield Research, October 22, 2014. Figure 2.1 Wooddale Valley View’s Primary Market Area and Retail Trade Area 16 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile 2.2 Real Estate Market Conditions Both quantitative and qualitative market research were conducted during the planning process to assess market support for various real estate types in the immediate Study Area. The research considered potential for retail commercial land uses and multiple-family, senior, and rental housing. The Project Archive, found at EdinaMN.gov/WVV, presents the complete and detailed market analysis, a profile of properties, and a summary of interviews and surveys with property and business owners. The findings of the quantitative market analysis are summarized below characterizing demand trends for office space, retail space and housing. New Retail Business Space •Small neighborhood business can thrive in the area. Some opportunity exists for neighborhood-oriented retailers catering to high-income family households and for business establishments that offer services to local households such as: Full-service and limited-service restaurants; Health care and personal care stores and providers; Insurance agencies, accountants, real estate agents. •Beyond that mentioned above, fairly limited demand for new retail space in the Study Area was found. Retail vacancy in 2014 was at 7.2 percent in the primary market area. Retail space availability in top trade areas (i.e. Edina) is tightening. Additionally, high household incomes and expenditures contribute to significant “leakage” of retail sales in several neighborhood- or convenience-oriented retail categories. Residents don’t need to travel far out of the Study Area for goods/services. (Retail leakage occurs when community members spend money outside the area or when money spent in an area is transferred out of the area.) New Office Space •Limited demand was found for new office space in the Study Area. Vacancy rates for office space remain high: 17.4 percent in the Twin Cities, 16.5 percent in the Southwest Submarket. The market for medical office space is tighter (5.6 percent off-campus vacancy rate in the southwest metro). Most office-using business establishments in the Study Area are relatively small in size. The existing supply of vacant office space in Edina can satisfy much of the projected growth. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 17 Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile For full definitions of senior housing terms such as ‘active adult’, ‘congregate’, ‘assisted living’ and ‘memory care’, see the Senior Market Housing Analysis (pages 36-37) of the Market Potential Analysis found in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV. •Regionally, it is expected that business growth will occur in industries that provide services to local households. Business establishments in sectors such as health care, insurance, accounting, and real estate, could be drawn to existing commercial space in the area. New Housing •A particularly strong and increasing demand for active adult senior housing was found. There are roughly 4,000 senior housing units in the Primary Market Area: 10 percent active adult* (independent living without services available), 63 percent congregate* (independent living with services available), 20 percent assisted living*, and 7 percent memory care*. At the end of 2014, six projects with 484 senior housing units are planned or under construction in the Primary Market Area. While there is one active adult project under construction in Edina, it appears that the market could support additional active adult units, and it is believed that the Study Area would serve as a viable location for active adult senior housing. •The demand and prices for for-sale multi-family homes are also increasing. General occupancy for-sale multifamily market conditions in Edina seem to be fairly robust, with increasing sales and rising prices. In Edina, townhome pricing increased 7 percent between 2009 and 2013. Condo prices are up 11 percent. It was found that demand exists for new for-sale multifamily units in the area, and a new for-sale multifamily development located in the Study Area would likely be well-received in the market. •There is pent-up demand and rising rental rates for general occupancy rental housing around the Study Area. However, opportunities for new rental housing in the Study Area may be further out. Below-equilibrium vacancy rates translates to pent-up demand and rising rental rates. There is a 2.4 percent vacancy rate in Edina and 2.6 percent vacancy rate in the Twin Cities (5.0 percent is considered equilibrium). Heavy development activity is occurring nearby. There are eight projects with over 1,700 units in the Primary Market Area. However, because there are currently several rental housing projects in development at locations within Edina and the Primary Market Area that are better-suited for rental housing, it is not recommended that rental housing development should be sought in the near-term. A smaller-scale, rental project that capitalizes on the neighborhood feel of the Study Area could be feasible by 2020. 18 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile Chapter 3 Economic Vitality Current Conditions 3.1 Trends and Challenges 3.2 Goals and Policies 3.3 Implementation Steps 3.4 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 19 Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality 3.1 Current Conditions As noted earlier in the plan, business activity at the node has evolved over the past 50 years due to changes in consumer patterns, changes in the roadway network, and the growth of the Southdale, Grandview, and 50th and France commercial areas. Some long-held properties at the node reflect a pattern of low rents, high vacancies, and a lack of updates. Several properties at the node have been sold, and the new owners have made substantial investments in these properties. Where this has occurred, the new businesses are operating successfully as owner-occupied and leased facilities. At the beginning of 2015, only a small number of businesses are selling retail goods. Please refer to Summary of Interviews with Property Owners and Tenants, in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV, to see the input that informed this section. The Changing and Challenging Context for Commercial Uses in the Node The node is often fondly remembered by long time Edina residents as a place where kids rode bikes to the superette to buy gum and baseball cards and where young people and families gathered for pizza or an ice cream treat. Additionally, a clinic, pharmacy, service station, salon, barber shop, pizzeria and service station met the needs of area residents. A variety of changes in the surrounding area have impacted the node since its development in the late 1950s and 1960s, creating an increasing number of challenges for Wooddale Valley View as a commercial node. They include: • Reduced traffic flow on Valley View Road due to the elimination of direct access between Valley View Road and Highway 100 that occurred when Highway 100 was improved to operate as a controlled access roadway facility; • Edina East High School relocated from its former location to one combined campus west of Highway 100; • A broad range of retail, medical, entertainment, banking, office and housing options developed in the Southdale area; • A healthy mix of grocery, hardware, banking, medical, dining and other goods and services evolved in the Grandview area; • Grocery, retail, personal services, banking, dining, entertainment activity and housing density have increased at the 50th and France node; • Parking requirements for commercial uses throughout the region and in Edina have increased gradually and significantly, making it difficult to provide today’s tenants with parking amenities that can compete with larger sites nearby; • Many aging commercial buildings are reaching the end of their lifecycle. 20 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality 3.2 Trends and Challenges In a sense, it’s true that the very attributes that give the Study Area its unique character and charm are the characteristics that are limiting competitiveness. Aging Commercial Spaces. Aging commercial buildings on the smaller sites nestled in the Wooddale Valley View node struggle to compete with more recently built commercial spaces in surrounding areas. Commercial buildings at Southdale, Grandview, and 50th and France, for example, succeed by offering newer, larger, more convenient, and more visible sites – while property owners at older nodes like Wooddale Valley View find it a struggle to cover maintenance, let alone reinvest in larger scale upgrades or amenities. Unique Commercial Sites. Factors such as property size, shape, and topography further contribute to an awkwardness of many of the sites for use as commercial properties. Access and parking issues make them comparatively less attractive to conventional businesses that require larger, auto-oriented formats more convenient to drivers. Because Valley View Road cuts through at an angle to the north-south street grid, many properties in the study area are small and uniquely shaped, with many placed on sharply angled corners within small blocks, making automobile access and parking configurations difficult to design. In addition, steeply sloping topography limits the viability of commercial development on the south side of Valley View Road within the study area. Parcel Lines and Aerial Image from Hennepin County PropertyInfo Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 21 Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality Competitive Commercial Context. Intense competition exists within one to two miles from regional centers (Southdale) and community centers (Grandview and 50th and France). These larger commercial areas present challenges for nearby neighborhood commercial nodes. See Report on Demographic and Market Trends, page 66, found in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV, for a definition of the types of shopping centers. Site Visibility, Traffic Count and Ease of Access. The strong competition mentioned above from three neighboring commercial areas located nearby compounds the negative effects of geographic isolation from the south and west by Highway 62 and Highway 100. Traffic on France Avenue can be a barrier for pedestrians and bicyclists to the east. Small lakes and large land masses for public/institutional use including Pamela Park, Edina Community Center/ Southview Middle School complex, and the Edina Country Club, reduce household density in the area. Visibility and access are primary considerations for retailers seeking to locate their businesses. The success of a particular retail location is dependent, in part, upon how easy it is for consumers to locate the business, distinguish the business from competitors, include the business in other activities, and stop at the business during their daily commute. Several factors are taken into consideration based on traffic counts and visibility when retailers select a site, including: • Daily traffic volumes in the area; • Proximity to public transportation; • Accessibility for potential customers as well as delivery vehicles; • Visibility of the store and business signage from surrounding roads; • The sites proximity to other traffic generators. Based on data sourced from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), it appears that Valley View Road experiences an AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic) of 5,300 vehicle trips per day, while the AADT along Wooddale Avenue is approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day. This is low compared to other commercial nodes. See Table 3A Comparable Traffic Counts. Therefore, due to the comparatively limited accessibility and visibility of the Study Area, the most likely retail uses to be drawn to the area will be neighborhood- and convenience-oriented establishments that supply goods and services to households nearby. 22 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality On Wooddale, North of Valley View On Valley View, West of Wooddale On Valley View, East of Wooddale 3,200 5,900 7,900 Two-Way Daily Traffic Volume - Wooddale Valley View (2013) On Penn, North of 54th On Penn, South of 54th On 54th, West of Penn On 54th, East of Penn 7,200 8,600 3,200 5,800 Two-Way Daily Traffic Volume - 54th and Penn (2013) On France, North of 44th On France, South of 44th On 44th, West of France On 44th, East of France 10,700 12,200 3,400 7,000 Two-Way Daily Traffic Volume - 44th and France(2013) On Xerxes, North of 56th On Xerxes, South of 56th 9,500 9,500 Two-Way Daily Traffic Volume 56th and Xerxes Table 3A Comparable Traffic Counts Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 23 Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality 3.3 Goals and Policies Ultimately, market conditions and the vision of property owners, developers, investors, businesses and the City will shape the future of the node as well as the timing the redevelopment activity. Today’s Mood: Hopeful Uncertainty Residents value the convenience of neighborhood retail and their relationships with small business owners, but commercial activity at the node will depend upon the vision of property owners and developers and their ability to find a strategic business mix that meets the evolving needs and desires of area residents in a market area that already provides a wealth of options within a one to two mile radius. Unfortunately, it is impossible to imagine the wide range of development proposals involving commercial and residential development for the Wooddale Valley View node that could come before the City over the next two decades. Today, the mixed mood of uncertainty combined with hopefulness among landowners, the business community, and residents translates to diverse perspectives on what it will take to strengthen the area as a commercial node. See the Project Archive at www.EdinaMN.gov/WVV for a Summary of Property and Business Owner Opinions and a list of issues identified by the community. The following goals and policies are forged from a balanced synthesis of these perspectives. Goals for Economic Vitality 1.Neighborhood Hub. Cultivate the Wooddale Valley View node as a hub of vitality with a mix of high quality neighborhood-serving businesses. Support investments that encourage gathering, pedestrian activity and that reinforce a “neighborhood feel”. 2.Short-term Revitalization. Support upgrades to existing properties through improved tenant mix and image, better marketing and promotion. 3.Right-Sized Retail and Commercial Spaces. Encourage and support an amount and range of spaces for businesses that is calibrated to the realities of the market and trade area. 4.Long-Range Market Forces. Encourage redevelopment of aging commercial properties and development of vacant land based on market forces. 24 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality Policies for Economic Vitality The following policies provide both structure and flexibility for the evaluation of proposals. 1.The City will encourage redevelopment that is driven by the private sector that aligns with the principles, goals, policies and guidelines of this plan. Development concepts and timing will be initiated by property owners, developers and investors based on market conditions. Development proposals will be evaluated using the direction provided in this Small Area Plan and the Edina Comprehensive Plan. 2.The City, at its discretion, will strategically invest, and/or use established financing tools, to support public realm improvements to encourage redevelopment of the neighborhood commercial node, consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. 3.The City will favor investments in neighborhood-serving retail, service sector businesses, and neighborhood-oriented public spaces. Investments in existing or new buildings that meet the needs of area residents and build a sense of community, identity and vitality should be favored. 4.The City will be supportive of formal or informal business and property owner collaborations. This includes public-private alliances or organizations seeking to strengthen the economic vitality of the node and its role in building community. 5.The City will discuss options for the property it owns at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road with adjacent landowners. Use property to leverage development or other changes that will promote the guiding principles, goals, policies and guidelines of the small area plan. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 25 Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality 3.4 Implementation Steps Table 3B Implementation Steps for Economic Vitality Action Leads Time Frame Convene Business Community and Property Owners. a.Review and discuss the implications of the market analysis prepared as part of the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. b.Review and discuss the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. Identify any ideas that merit further consideration or research. Work with the City to prioritize and identify elements that could be moved forward on the improvement calendar such as bike and pedestrian improvements, lighting, boulevard; public art installations. c.Learn about how successful business and property owners can work together to build economic vitality. d. Learn about models for collaboration between the business community and emerging neighborhood associations or established resident groups. e.Determine if there is an interest and willingness to continue meeting and begin working together on the strategy outlined in this plan. If so, achievable goals, roles and responsibilities should be identified. Administration Department / Economic Development 2015 City-Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road. Discuss options for the City-owned property with adjacent landowners. Use property to leverage development or other changes that will promote the guiding principles, goals, policies and guidelines of the small area plan. Administration Department / Economic Development 2016 26 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Chapter 4 Land Use and Community Design Current Conditions 4.1 Trends and Challenges 4.2 Goals and Policies 4.3 Implementation Steps 4.4 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 27 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.1 Current Conditions The 2014 pattern of land use in the Study Area is summarized by Figure 4.1 and the related table. A detailed description of land use, buildings, major tenants and property owners is presented in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV. Building Type Year Built Current Land Use (at end of 2014) 1 1954 Retail and service – former gasoline service station; presently unused 2 1956 Mixed use: small offices over clothing retailer and ice cream shop 3 1957 Service business - dry cleaning 4 1957 Retail and service - strip mall (Edina Village Market (EVM)) 5 1959 Retail and service - addition to strip mall (EVM) 6 1959 Service business - salon 7 1960 Residential – apartment building with underground parking 8 1960* Small offices (ValleyWood) 9 1962 Residential – apartment building with underground parking 10 1963 Residential – apartment building with underground parking 11 1969 Residential – apartment building with underground parking 12 1969 Office – professional service business (*recently updated) 13 1970 Service business – child day care 14 no bldg Undeveloped site – owned by the City = Two Story Vertical Mixed Commercial - Office over Retail / Services = One Story Commercial = Multi-family Residential - Duplex / Apartments / Flats Figure 4.1 Pattern of Land Existing Properties: Building Types, Year Built and Current Land Uses in 2014 28 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.2 Trends and Challenges Community input, real estate market conditions and existing physical conditions are all drivers of the principles, goals and policies of this plan. The community engagement process and results were outlined in Chapter 1 Introduction. Real estate market conditions and future trends are presented in detail in Chapter 2 Demographic and Market Profile and Chapter 3 Economic Vitality. Below is a review of physical conditions that also factor into land use and community design decision making in the Study Area: Aging Buildings. Most of the buildings in the Study Area are older and some have not been as well maintained as perhaps they would have been under better market conditions. The commercial buildings were created during an era when the business environment and the traffic patterns were much different than they are today. Buildings Set Back with Surface Parking. Many of the commercial buildings are set back behind a parking area, separating shopfronts from the street. This can reduce convenience for those arriving on foot, by bike or by transit, and creating a less attractive and comfortable streetscape experience for pedestrians. Moving buildings too far back (especially when cars are parked in front) can reduce the positive effects of spatial enclosure, expose customers to elements and discourage the casual strolling often found in successful retail environments and popular gathering places. Lack of Streetscape Investments. The appearance of the Study Area is diminished by the lack of trees and green boulevards along the edges of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Traffic Patterns. There is quite a bit of traffic through the Study Area but much of it consists of pass-through trips, especially at peak hours. When the intersection of Valley View Road and Highway 100 was closed, access to businesses in the Study Area from west of the highway and other locations was greatly diminished. In addition, Wooddale Avenue does not intersect or cross Highway 62 south of the Study Area. Scale and Shape of Parcels. The Study Area contains a range of unique parcels, many with smaller sizes with irregular shapes. While this contributes to the node’s unique character, these conditions present site design challenges for redevelopment projects. Relationship to Neighborhoods. The adjacent neighborhoods consist mostly of single-family detached housing in good condition. There is little separation, buffering or transition from the buildings of the Study Area to that housing. Providing a proper transition from more active areas nto the neighborhood may present challenges. Terrain. South of the Study Area, the land slopes steeply down to ponds. This creates accessibility and parking issues that make these sites less amenable to commercial uses, especially retail. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 29 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.3 Goals and Policies The following is a policy framework that provides guidance to the public sector for future decision making, staff review of development applications, municipal plan implementation and community based initiatives. The following takes into account the opinions and values of stakeholders, the parameters of previous planning and existing policies. The Study Area will continue to evolve and become a mixture of housing and commercial development guided by the demands of the market, property owners’ decisions, the policies and guidelines of this plan, and the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Though the proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014, the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change. Land Use and Community Design Goals 1.Activation of the Core. Concentrate activity and neighborhood-serving commercial businesses near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Any new buildings introduced at the four corners of the Wooddale Valley View intersection should include street-level retail or gathering spaces that interact with the sidewalk and encourage pedestrian activity. 2.Building-to-Street Relationships. Ensure that ground-level frontages throughout the node are carefully designed with public-to-private relationships that encourage beauty, safety, informal interaction, walkability and a sense of place. 3.Graceful Transitions. Encourage the scale of buildings to transition from center to edge of the Neighborhood Node, with the largest buildings located near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, decreasing in scale toward the surrounding single-family neighborhood. Ensure that redevelopment near single family homes is designed sensitively. 4.Flexible Evolution of Land Uses. Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to the market. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change: The commercial site north of Valley View Road and Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. The Edina Village Market may redevelop as a mix of housing and commercial. The sites east of Kellogg Avenue immediately north of Valley View Road may evolve as either commercial or residential. 5.Drive-Through Formats. Discourage buildings with drive-through elements such as gasoline stations and those with drive-up windows. They are inconsistent with the guiding principles of this plan. 30 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Policies for Land Use and Community Design 1.The City will introduce the Neighborhood Node (NN)* Future Land Use Plan designation, as presented in this plan. The City will adopt this plan as an amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and amend zoning and related ordinances to align with this plan. 2.The City will review development applications of all future projects (within the boundaries of the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node) to ensure compliance with the Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines*. The guidelines include: A.Building Height Limits Plan B.Building Frontage Guidelines C.Gathering Space Guidelines D.Site-Specific Guidelines E.General Guidelines (for the Entire Neighborhood Node) *The Neighborhood Node (NN) boundaries, its description, and the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are presented in the following pages. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 31 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design HDR Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN) This plan introduces Neighborhood Node (NN) as a new land use category specifically for use within a portion of the Wooddale Valley View Study Area. Also see description and Table 4A. At shown, at Wooddale Valley View it replaces the previous Neighborhood Commercial (NC) designation that was established within this area in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. Neighborhood Node (NN). High Density Residential (HDR). It is recommended that the apartment building located at the southwest corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, currently planned HDR, be included in the Neighborhood Node classification on the Preferred Land Use Plan, as shown above. Low Density Residential (LDR) Low Density Attached Residential (LDAR) Open Space and Parks (OSP) Public/Semi-Public (PSP) No changes are recommended to these Land Use Plan classifications from the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. They are all located outside the boundary of the Study Area. LDR LDA OSP PSP NN Figure 4.2 Preferred Land Use Plan 32 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan See Resolutions 2017-102 & 2018-26 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Similar to the Neighborhood Commercial category, Neighborhood Node: •Supports Neighborhood Serving Businesses. Encourages small- to moderate-scale businesses that serve primarily the adjacent neighborhoods. Primary land uses should be retail and services, offices, studios, and institutional uses. In addition, designation as Neighborhood Node provides: •Predictability for Current Landowners. Supports current owners’ efforts to invest in improvements their properties by providing a predictable planning framework for the area. •Flexibility for Redevelopment. Provides greater flexibility to the development market by more explicitly encouraging the inclusion of needed housing. •New Gathering Space / Placemaking. Encourages intentional integration of landscaped open space and new formal public spaces. •Protection of Community Values such as Scale, Walkability and Character. A set of Development Guidelines protects the scale, walkability and character of the existing area by regulating the relationship of buildings-to-streets and the transition of building heights from node-to-neighborhood. Table 4A - Neighborhood Node Land Use Category (Also see Figure 4.2.) Land Use Category General Description Development Guidelines Density Guidelines NN Neighborhood Node In general, small- to moderate-scale commercial, residential or mixed use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood(s). Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood-serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential. Building footprints generally less than 20,000 square feet (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. Encourage development to comply with the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines*: A.Building Height Limits Plan B.Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D.Site-Specific Guidelines E.General Guidelines Maximum residential density up to 30 dwelling units per acre (du/acre). (Densities are further constrained by the parameters of the Building Height Limits Plan*). Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) per zoning code. *The Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are found on the following pages. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 33 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines A.Building Height Limits Plan The building height limits for the Neighborhood Node are indicated in Figure 4.3. Generally: •Height Limits Near the Center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley View Road, building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet. •Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important (as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet. Figure 4.3 Building Height Limits Plan, on the following page, defines height limits throughout the Neighborhood Node. Figure 4.3b, also on the following page, depicts existing height limits so that comparison can be made between current policy and what is proposed. 34 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Figure 4.3 Building Height Limits Plan Four Story Limit. Up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet Three Story Limit. Up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet Two Story Limit. Up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet Two Story Transition (36’ Deep)* Height Limit: Up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet (vertically) within the specified 36 feet in horizontal distance from property line. Two Story Transition (60’ Deep)* Height limit: Up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet (vertically) within the specified 60 feet in horizontal distance from property line. * (These ‘Transition’ designations were created to establish a graceful transition from Neighborhood Node properties with three story limits to immediately adjacent residential areas outside the node.) Figure 4.3-b Existing Building Height Limits as Defined by Building Height Overlay District (Source: Article XI, Division 2, Building Height Overlay District, and Appendix A of the Official Zoning Map.) Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 35 See Resolutions 2017-102 & 2018-26 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design B.Building Frontage Guidelines The location of a range of climatically-appropriate frontage types is depicted by Figure 4.4 and Figure 4.5. These guidelines do not address style or building vernacular but will ensure streets that are lined with ground level features that contribute to active, safe and walkable streets. Generally: •Building-to-Street Relationships. Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1-F6 illustrates typical configurations of building to street (private-to-public) relationships and describes their varying appropriate context. These ‘Frontage Types’ shown are based on successful historic precedents found in many older multi-modal neighborhoods of Edina, including the Wooddale Valley View Study Area, and throughout the Twin Cities and the Midwest. •Node-to-Neighborhood Transitions. The frontage types are keyed to their appropriate neighborhood context within the Neighborhood Node in Figure 4.5 Context Areas. The purpose of the map is to guide new development toward ground level building design that maintains visually graceful and walkable transitions from the more active areas to the quieter single-family residential neighborhood streets. Figures 4.4 and 4.5 on the following pages present the Building Frontage Guidelines of Wooddale Valley View’s Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines. 36 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1-F6 High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 37 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Preferred Frontages by Context Area Node Transitional Neighborhood Storefront F1 discouraged not permitted Doorway F2 not permitted Stoop F3 discouraged Shared Entry F4 discouraged Porch F5 discouraged Common Lawn F6 not permitted discouraged Storefronts (F1) Strongly Encouraged Figure 4.5 Building Frontage Guidelines: Context Areas 38 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design C.Gathering Space Guidelines As redevelopment occurs over time, small landscaped open spaces and a larger public multi-use space should be introduced strategically throughout the Neighborhood Node. These may soften the buildings, buffer views to surface parking, provide transitions to nearby single-family housing, provide outdoor gathering places and generally extend the green character of the neighborhood. These spaces may be privately or publicly owned and maintained or owned and maintained as part of a public-private partnership. Multi-Use Gathering Space. A public multi-use space such as a plaza could be incorporated into improvements or redevelopments proposed at these locations: •The City-owned property at Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue •The ValleyWood office site at the northeast of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road intersection •The Edina Village Market and/or the former gas station site on the northwest corner of the Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road intersection Figure 4.6 on the following page illustrates methods of incorporating gathering space guidelines. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 39 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 1.Spatial Enclosure. Enclose and activate the space with taller buildings with active ground level uses. 2.Holding the Street. Bring (cozy) all buildings up close to the public space or the street. 3.Protection From Elements. Plant trees along the edges of all streets and spaces to provide shade and protection for pedestrians moving next to and in and out of buildings. Encourage deep awnings along all shopfronts. 4.Programming. Program the space with annual, seasonal and weekly events to activate the space. 5.Flexibility. Maximize flexibility by using temporary or mobile event equipment, and avoid encumbering the space with permanent vertical features. 6.Visual Interest and Identity. Anchor key visual points or defining and active spots such as intersection corners with meaningful/interpretive public art, perhaps doubling as rest/seating. 7.Universal Design. Establish universally accessible sidewalks along all edges of all spaces. 8.Accommodate Cyclists. Accommodate bicycles around the perimeter of the space with fewer steps, ample bike parking and safe access to bike lanes. Figure 4.6: Concept Illustrating Gathering Space Guidelines at the Northwest Corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road 40 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design D.Site-Specific Guidelines The following guidelines apply to specific properties in the Neighborhood Node. Specific sites addressed: Site A) Corner Properties at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road Site B) Fairfax Avenue and West 61st Street (South Side) Site C) City-owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road Site D) “Eastern Gateway” - Valley View Road at Oaklawn Ave. and West 62nd St. Figure 4.7 Key Map of Site-Specific Guidelines Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 41 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Site A) Corner Properties of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road This is the crossroads of the Pamela Park and Concord Neighborhoods and a key location in the node. Therefore, private and public improvements at this location should encourage activity, a sense of place, and a feeling of arrival. Accordingly: a.Building Height and Mix of Uses. Locate taller buildings near this intersection, possibly including vertically mixed-use structures. b.Enclosure. Locate buildings close to the sidewalks. However a small plaza or green space could be sited at the corner. See Gathering Space Guidelines. c.Activity. Include prominent outdoor seating; public art or monuments can add visual interest. As illustrated by Figure 4.6. d.Ground Level Transparency. Connect commercial spaces to the streets with storefronts with transparent windows. See Building Frontage Guidelines. e.Streetscape Design. Incorporate decorative street lights, trees and sidewalks that lead to this focal point. See Chapter 5: Transportation and Street Design. Northwest Corner: Edina Village Market and the Former Wally’s Station. When the opportunity arises to redevelop the parcel at the northwest corner in a significant way, the Neighborhood Node’s Site Specific Guidelines (above) and the Gathering Space Guidelines (as illustrated in Fig. 4.6) will be used as criteria for review and approval of redevelopment proposals. In the interim, the former Wally’s building could be converted or enlarged for use as one or more small businesses. A landscaped multi-use public space could be created between the building and the intersection. Street-edge landscaping on this private site could be improved, particularly if parking is created between the building and the streets for the re-purposing of this building. The Edina Village Market could receive better signage and perhaps a mural on the eastern wall. The owner of the Edina Village Market (or ValleyWood office building) might be persuaded to conduct a weekly outdoor market on a portion of their parking lot. If reuse of Wally’s proves difficult, eliminating the Wally’s building prior to eventual corner redevelopment would increase the visibility of Edina Village Market from the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Looking northwest toward the corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. 42 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Site B) Fairfax Avenue and W. 61st Street (South Side) To establish a graceful transition from the node to the neighborhood streets to the north: a.Residential Uses Encouraged. As stated in the definition of Neighborhood Node earlier in this plan, commercial uses are not prohibited within properties with Neighborhood Node designation. Nevertheless, it is recommended that development along the northern edge of the study area include residential uses such as detached single-family houses and/or rowhouses. Commercial uses in this area, if any, should be limited as much as possible to the corners of Wooddale Avenue and have primary frontages facing Wooddale Avenue. b.Two Story ‘Transition’. Within the Neighborhood Node, all new buildings introduced along Fairfax Avenue and W. 61st Street must be limited to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet in height, for a distance of 60 feet from the property lines along those streets. See Figure 4.3 - Building Height Limits Plan. c.Compatible Frontages. New buildings introduced along these streets must have frontages that complement the single-family housing to the north. See Building Frontage Guidelines. d.Street Trees. Trees should be maintained in the Fairfax Avenue and W. 61st Street rights-of-way. Looking west on Fairfax Avenue from near the corner of Wooddale Avenue. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 43 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Site C) The City-Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road Because of its ownership by the City, size, configuration, and location near the eastern end of the Study Area, the City-owned parcel is recognized as a unique and critical property. (See Parcel A on Figure 4.8) Community members’ opinions about its future use in the Study Area were varied and included commercial, residential, mixed use, and a public use consisting of a plaza/park/open space. Of primary importance to the community is that any new development be carefully designed to respect the scale and context of the single family homes northward along Kellogg, and that the success of adjacent businesses are not negatively affected. •Leveraging the Property to Accomplish Plan Goals. The City-owned property should be leveraged to advance the principles, goals, policies and guidelines of this plan. Optimizing the use of the City-owned property (0.25 acres) will likely require assembling the property with neighboring privately-owned parcels in the future. At that time, the City will review the merits of any development proposal for conformance to this plan. Future uses could include residential and/or commercial development, with possibility of dedication of a portion of the site as a Gathering Space (see Gathering Space Guidelines) or other public space. During the interim period, the city- owned land should continue to be maintained as passively used and publicly accessible open space. * •Creating a Flexible Framework for Public–Private Collaboration. Previously the City worked with major commercial property owners to facilitate new development in the node, so somewhat greater flexibility in the planning for parcels labeled A,B,C (as shown in Figure 4.8) was assumed in the small area plan. Thus, the goals and policies stated earlier in this chapter, along with the site specific guidelines on the following pages, were developed simply as a guiding framework. Similar to all other sites in the node, there exists the premise that land assembly and market forces should and will determine the *Regarding the Long Range Use ofthe Land as Public Space: Both the Guiding Principles (in Section 1.5), and the Land Use and Community Design Goals (earlier in Section 4.3), encourage the strengthening of the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road as the active center Neighborhood Node. Land uses near this location (such as the City–ownedsite) that encourage economic activity, public gathering and social interaction, will be encouraged. Accordingly, the long term exclusive use of the City- owned property as a passive open space is not encouraged. The site owned by the City at Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue 44 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design exact land use of any redevelopment. Figure 4.8 shows optional redevelopment alternatives for the City-owned site are considered in this plan in the context of various land assembly alternatives illustrated by Figure 4.8. Property A Only (0.25 acres) - Capacity studies were not performed during the planning process for Property A as a redevelopment site (by itself) due to size constraints. It is conceivable that a small commercial or residential development could be accommodated, but would likely require off-site shared parking. Properties A + B (0.40 acres combined) - This is alternative was studied during the planning process. See Figures 4.8 - 4.10. The current land use on Property B is a surface parking lot that is provided for patrons of the ValleyWood office building. Properties A + B + C (0.55 acres combined) - This land assembly alternative, due to its size, presents the most flexibility in terms of design alternatives. However, site plan alternatives were not studied during the planning process because Property C was outside of the Neighborhood Commercial boundary in the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, outside of the Study Area.* Figure 4.8 Property Ownership near City–Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road B ValleyWood CEdina Housing Foundation A City of Edina *Regarding Application of Guidelines: If Property C were to be combined with the other two sites in a redevelopment project, the principles, goals and policies of the Small Area Plan, including the Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines, should apply, ensuring a graceful transition (both in regards to height and frontage) northward along Kellogg to the single family homes adjacent and across the street. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 45 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Gauging Community Preferences. Three hypothetical site development scenarios (site capacity studies) were presented to residents at the Progress Update Event on December 3rd 2014, to spark discussion on the merits of different types of development that could occur on the property. (See Figure 4.9). Each of the three options assume that collaboration is possible with the owner of the parking lot parcel to the north. Opinions of the neighborhood residents attending were exactly split between support for the commercial (50%) vs. residential concepts (50%): •Flex Commercial. (The favorite of 50% of participants.) The ‘Flex Commercial’ option includes one or more neighborhood-serving businesses in a one story format. Preferred design guidelines for this option are shown in Figure 4.11. •Rowhouses. (The favorite of 34% of participants.) The ‘Rowhouses option includes a diverse set of market rate attached single family homes with tuck- under garages and elevated stoops. •Manor (Flats/Apts). (The favorite of 17% of participants.) This option included a multi-unit residential building with parking underneath. If the market determines that commercial use is unsuitable, acceptable alternatives to commercial use could be rowhouses or a small multi-family residential building using the Stoop (F3) or Shared Entry (F4) building frontage. Other uses and design concepts are certainly possible. Figure 4.9 Three Alternatives for Properties A+B: City-Owned Site (Property A) + ValleyWood Parking Lot (Property B) Presented for Community Review at Community Meeting in November 2014 High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV 46 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A + B ‘Flex Commercial’ Alternative Guidelines for the redevelopment of the City-owned site as “Flex Commercial” alternative are as follows. Please also refer to Figure 4.10. a. Shared Parking. Partially reconfigure parking to open up for shared use by the new commercial spaces. b.On-Street Parking. Retain head-in parking along Kellogg Avenue. c.Frontage. Storefront (F1) Frontage along Valley View Road. d. Public (Gathering) Space. Increased set-back/chamfering at the southeast corner allows for an expanded sidewalk seating area and/or fair weather retail/merchandising space. It also allows for continued visibility to the small shops on the northeast corner of Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road. e. Service. Loading, solid waste and recycling bins accessed and handled off the rear service lane, away from Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road. f.Neighborhood-Serving Businesses. Initial tenants should include neighborhood-serving commercial businesses. Figure 4.10 Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A + B as “Flex Commercial” e a b c d f Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 47 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Site D) WVV’s ‘Eastern Gateway’ (Valley View Road at Oaklawn and W. 62nd St.) The parcel located at 4400 Valley View Road has a particular advantage in being perceived as the first commercial property when approaching from the east. It forms a gateway into the Wooddale Valley View node. Currently a salon, it could remain in commercial use or transition to residential use. a.Orientation. As a commercial use, the building should maintain a primary frontage oriented south toward Valley View Road and carefully screen its parking from the housing to the north. As illustrated in Figure 4.11, if the property becomes a residential use the building may face either south and/or the east, whichever is more advantageous for buffering the building’s parking from the housing to the north. b.Gentle Transition from Node to Neighborhood. Whether the site is used for commercial or residential development, landscaping, screening and building height should be designed to help the building serve as an end cap for the residential block next to Valley View Road. * The building height limit in this location is two stories. See Figure 4.3 – Building Height Limit Plan. c.Gateway Public Art. There is space in the property and street right-of-way in front of this site to accommodate some form of vertical public art, banner pole or similar monument that will establish a sense of entry. This would be experienced as you approach from the east along Valley View or 62nd Street and from the north on Oaklawn. d.Architectural Vernacular. This plan does not attempt to prescribe the style or architectural vernacular of the building, that is, the exterior materials, window proportions or detailing. Only the height and relationship of buildings to the street are specified. It is not intended that a row house building must look like the one shown by Figure 4.11.* Conceptual Illustration of Guidelines. Figure 4.11 below illustrates one example in which a row house building would be configured following the guidelines above. This two story design faces east, with stoops facing the street, parking Looking west toward the ‘Eastern Gateway’ of the Wooddale Valley View node. 48 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design tucked under the building, a small embedded commercial space fronting the sidewalk on Valley View Road, and a public art entry monument at the corner that terminates three vistas. Figure 4.11 Example of a Rowhouse Configured to Follow Site-Specific Guidelines Presented for Community Review at Community Progress Update in November of 2014 High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV Design Study: Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 49 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design E. General Guidelines for the Entire Neighborhood Node On-Site Parking and Site Access •Encourage Underground Parking. Residents’ parking should be located under the buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions. •Visually Buffer Surface Parking Lots. Commercial parking should be behind or along-side the buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to encourage an active streetscape. •Display Consistent Signage: Signage pylons, window display signs, and on- site directional signage should be consistent in terms of colors and materials. Signage should clearly mark site access and direction for automobile and bicycle access from streets. •Install Edge Treatments along Surface Parking Lots: Edge treatments along the borders between private surface parking lots and the adjacent sidewalks should include a planting strip approximately two feet wide (or more) and permanent planting or fencing approximately three feet high. (Following City standards where applicable.) •Construct Organized Parking Lots: Surface parking lots should be constructed to adhere to City of Edina standards regarding stall width and length and aisle width. Pedestrian-oriented lighting should be installed on islands within surface parking lots. Where applicable, clearly defined pedestrian paths should be marked so that pedestrians can safely walk between the parking lot and on-site buildings. Other Improvements As properties redevelop, the City may require investment in on-site or public facilities that complement new projects, such as: •Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking facilities located close to the front doors of businesses. •On-Site Lighting. On-site pedestrian-oriented lighting. •Interpretive Monuments and Public Art. Entry monuments, which can serve as gateways, should be installed at strategic locations within the Study Area. The monuments could be local or regional historical markers, memorials or public art installations. Strategic locations that might serve to mark progression through or arrival in the node include, but are not limited to, the corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View, the intersection of 62nd Street and Valley View Road, the intersection of 62nd Street Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road. 50 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Heritage Preservation Community members including residents, business owners, and property owners, felt that the Study Area’s history should be further understood, celebrated, and if possible, incorporated as one of many organizing principles around which future development and public realm improvements should occur. •Individual Sites and Buildings. While the Study Area is located in a city rich with history, it may be likely that no single site or structure within the boundaries of the Study Area would meet the typical criteria for local designation or for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. Many of the buildings are just now reaching the age requirement, and a cursory survey by the Consultant Team found that few if any of the buildings may possess (or have retained) the architectural or historic characteristics typically required for local or national designation. To adequately verify this cursory finding, a more thorough investigation such as a Historic Resources Survey would be necessary. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 51 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.4 Implementation Steps Table 4B Implementation Actions for Land Use and Community Design Action Leads Anticipated Time Frame Incorporate this Plan by Reference. The City will adopt the Wooddale at Valley View Small Area Plan into the Edina Comprehensive Plan by reference, giving it authority equal to the balance of the Comprehensive Plan. For the area defined in this plan as Neighborhood Node, this plan overrides the following: •2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan’s Figure 4.3, Future LandUse Plan along with Tables 4.2 and 4.3. •2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan’s Figure 4.6A ; to amendthe building height limitation for the Study Area consistent with the policies of this plan. Policies and guidelines regarding the Study Area in the next update of the Comprehensive Plan will be adjusted to reflect this plan. Community Development Department Upon Adoption 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Zoning Regulations and Map. The City will amend the Zoning Map to replace the two sites zoned Planned Commercial District-4 with the Planned Commercial District-1 designation. •The PCD-4 district allows automobile service centers, car washes and gasoline stations. •The PCD-1 district allows certain retail or service businessesas Permitted Uses and multiple-family housing as Conditional Uses. The City will use the policies and guidance of this plan as the conditions of review for proposed multiple-family housing. The City will amend the zoning ordinance regarding height maximums to be consistent with this plan. Community Development Department 2015/2016 2015/2016 Application Reviews. City staff and Officials will use this plan when reviewing applications for land development or zoning amendments in the Study Area. Community Development Department; City Planning Commission and Council Ongoing 52 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Chapter 5 Transportation and Street Design Current Conditions 5.1 Trends and Challenges 5.2 Goals and Policies 5.3 Implementation Steps 5.4 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 53 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 5.1 Current Conditions Image from Bing Maps, 2015 Jurisdiction of Roadways Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Street are under City of Edina jurisdiction and are designated as Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. This designation is afforded to streets that link regional roads. Therefore, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has an interest in their design, operation, and maintenance. Mn/DOT design standards must be followed when considering improvements to Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Street, and deviations must be approved before they can be implemented. Functional Classification of Roadways Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Street are functionally classified as collector streets. This is particularly important for Valley View Road, which operates as an east/west connector corridor. Its location within the City (south of 50th Street and north of Highway 62 and with linkages to Highway 100 and France Avenue) position it to carry through traffic, which does not have a trip end (origin or destination) in the Small Area Plan Study Area. At the same time, Valley View Road is lined with residences and neighborhood-oriented businesses, and some of its traffic is, therefore, local traffic. 54 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Wooddale Avenue As shown in the Figure 5.1, the typical condition of Wooddale Avenue north of Valley View Road is 31 feet-wide from face of curb-to-face of curb and is constructed within 66 feet of public right-of-way. It exists today as a two lane street between Fairfax Avenue and Garrison Lane. A five foot-wide sidewalk is located along the east side of Wooddale in the segment between Fairfax Avenue and Valley View Road. There is no sidewalk on the west side of Wooddale Avenue within this segment. Bicycles are accommodated on Wooddale Avenue, north of Valley View Road, with sharrows (shared lane markings). Within each existing 14 foot-wide lane, the effective width of roadway for cyclists is approximately six feet wide in both directions. Private properties are located outside the public right-of-way on both the west and east sides of Wooddale Avenue. The Edina Village Market is located on the west side of Wooddale Avenue, and the ValleyWood office building is on the east side. The right-of-way on the west side of Wooddale Avenue includes several curb cuts, with trees planted in grassy areas between driveways. On the east side, the surface parking lot for the ValleyWood office building actually encroaches into the public right-of-way by about twelve feet. Chevrons are painted in street to indicate a “sharrow” or a “share the road” condition. Figure 5.1 Wooddale Avenue Existing Conditions Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 55 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Valley View Road The overall right-of-way width of Valley View Road is 66 feet between property lines on the west side of Wooddale Avenue. Within the right-of-way are two travel lanes, each 17 feet wide, and one five foot-wide sidewalk on the south side of the street. There is no sidewalk on the north side of Valley View Road in this segment. Outside the right-of-way, west of Wooddale Avenue, is the Edina Village Market on the north side of Valley View Road and an apartment building on the south side of the street. As shown on the typical section, the Edina Village Market has been built on a rise that is about 12 feet higher than Valley View Road at the western property line of the Edina Village Market. This segment of Valley View Road to the west of the intersection with Wooddale Avenue was studied because of its relationship to the Edina Village Market and, additionally, because it is a comparatively older roadway segment than Valley View Road east of the intersection. Figure 5.2 Valley View Road Existing Conditions 56 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 62nd Street Sixty-second (62nd) Street is an east/west MSA street (and regional route) that links two other regional routes, Valley View Road and France Avenue. It also provides direct access to residences. The configuration of its intersection with Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road is not desirable because: •Inadequate Spacing of Intersections. The intersection of Oaklawn Avenue and 62nd Street is only 50 feet from the intersection of 62nd Street and Valley View Road. •Storage Distance. The storage (stacking) distance for southbound vehicles on 62nd Street approaching Valley View Road is less than 20 feet long. •Approach. The curvilinear alignment of 62nd Street, as it approaches Oaklawn Avenue from the east, encourages drivers to enter the curve at higher than desirable speeds. •Lack of Traffic Control Device. There is no traffic control device to regulate the flow (or speed) of westbound traffic on 62nd Street as it approaches Oaklawn Avenue from the east. Intersection Oaklawn, 62nd Street, and Valley View Road. 62nd Valley View Oaklawn Brookview Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 57 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 5.2 Trends and Challenges Traffic Control and Safety Regional and Sub-Regional (or Through) Traffic versus Local Traffic. The majority of traffic on Study Area streets is likely regional and sub-regional traffic that passes through the area. This traffic is defined as having a trip origin and trip destination outside the Study Area. Today, the design of streets and intersections is more oriented toward serving regional traffic than local traffic, even though a significant percentage of traffic in the Study Area is local traffic with one or more trip end in the Study Area. Daily Traffic Volumes. Traffic within the Study Area is forecast to grow. Daily traffic actually decreased between 1999 and 2005 but increased between 2005 and 2013. The percentage of growth in daily traffic has historically been higher on Valley View Road compared to Wooddale Avenue. This trend is expected to continue in the future where daily traffic on Wooddale Avenue is forecast to increase from 3,200 (in 2013) to 3,500 (in 2030), a nine percent increase. During this same period, daily traffic on Valley View Road, east of Wooddale Avenue, is forecast to increase from 7,900 (in 2013) to 11,000 (in 2030), a 39 percent increase. Table 5A: Historical and Forecast Daily Traffic Volumes Year Two-Way Daily Traffic Volume On Wooddale, North of Valley View On Valley View, West of Wooddale On Valley View, East of Wooddale 1999* 4100 6400 9400 2005* 3050 5000 7900 2013* 3200 5900 7900 2030** 3500 Not Provided 11000 *Mn/DOT MSA Street Series Mapping ** City of 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan The Roadway Design Challenge. A roadway system that accommodates all users is what is desired in the Study Area. The challenge is to coordinate any design improvements for Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Street to ensure that all modes of transportation are integrated. As learned during the planning process, the City and its residents are interested in seeing the Study Area become more friendly to pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders. 58 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Parking Parking Supply Currently Exceeds Demand. The supply of parking at the two commercial/retail centers in the Study Area (Edina Village Market on the northwest corner of the Wooddale Valley View intersection and ValleyWood Center on the northeast corner) currently outstrips parking demand most of the time. This situation could change in the future as redevelopment and development occur and parking generation associated with new uses increases. Parking Takes Up Space. Each parking stall requires a minimum of 162 square feet, and, with the addition of 24 foot-wide drive aisles, an average of 350 square feet is required for each parked car. Parking is Expensive. The cost of constructing a single parking stall in a surface lot is between $6,000 and $7,000 in 2015. Parking structures and parking garages, with additional costs for supporting structures and excavation, can be four times to seven times more expensive than surface lots. As is obvious, the provision of on-site parking can impact project development economics and bears on the amount of usable space that can ultimately be constructed. The Parking Challenge. Parking supply and configuration can impact development potential. Of concern would be development and redevelopment economics. There is a balance that should be considered during the development review and approval process where the size of a development is weighed against the supply of parking that is required. Site Access Excessive Driveways. The Study Area for the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan has 16 access driveways in the immediate vicinity of the key intersection. Numerous access driveways can make it more convenient for cars to enter and exit private properties. At the same time, each driveway introduces a conflict point along the roadway network, and it is at conflict points where crashes occur. Pedestrian and bicycle circulation is impeded by driveways where cars can enter and leave a site. The Accessibility Challenge. As redevelopment and development occur over time, the proper number of driveways should be required. The number of driveways can be reduced through strategies where adjacent property owners share a driveway. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 59 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Walking, Biking and Access to Transit The Study Area lacks a consistent provision of facilities that would encourage and support safe and convenient reliance on alternative travel modes. Lacking are sidewalks for walking, dedicated bikeways for biking, and comfortable and properly located transit shelters for riding the bus. Lack of Sidewalks. Sidewalks are not provided within the Study Area on: • the west side of Wooddale Avenue, north of Valley View Road, • neither the west nor east side of Wooddale Avenue, south of Valley View Road, • the north side of Valley View Road, west of Wooddale Avenue. Lack of Marked Crosswalks. There are only two marked pedestrian crosswalks (instead of four) at the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Lack of Pedestrian-Oriented Street Lighting. Pedestrian-oriented street lighting is provided along Valley View Road east of Wooddale Avenue. Consistent lighting provided throughout the entire Study Area could greatly increase the sense of safety and walkability after sunset. Lack of Dedicated Bikeways. Dedicated bikeways are needed on Valley View Road, west of Wooddale Avenue. Lack of Tree-Planted Boulevards. Boulevards with a consistent canopy of planted trees between sidewalks and the streets enhance walkability by providing: • protection from the elements, • buffering etween pedestrian and vehicles, • beauty. Lack of Comfortable Transit Facilities. Existing transit facilities are bus stops (without shelters) that are too close to the street and without pedestrian pathways for access to/from them. Providing improved, comfortable and climate-protected transit shelters, that are positioned in safe locations, will encourage more people to use transit. The Alternative Mode Challenge. The challenge is to fit sidewalks, marked crosswalks, pedestrian-oriented lighting, dedicated bikeways, planted boulevards, and improved transit facilities into the existing public right-of-way and/or to ensure that as redevelopment and development occurs these facilities are included in approved design plans. A related challenge is to ensure that facilities that encourage and support alternative travel modes are located so as to make travel to/from key destinations in the Study Area safe and convenient. A final challenge is to determine the timing for implementation of improvements. 60 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 5.3 Goals and Policies Transportation goals and policies for the Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan are consistent with transportation objectives identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the City’s Living Streets Policy, which is awaiting adoption as of February 24, 2015. They also address specific issues raised in the community Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. As stated in the Comprehensive Plan, “There is a fundamental link between transportation planning and land use planning. Successful land use planning cannot take place without taking transportation considerations into account. Conversely, transportation planning is driven by the need to support existing and future land uses which the community supports and/or anticipates.” Transportation goals developed for the Small Area Plan recognize this fundamental linkage and are aimed at ensuring safe and convenient travel through and within the Study Area. Consistency with Living Streets Principles. According to the Edina Living Streets Policy, streets in Edina should “balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health.” The Living Streets Policy envisions Edina as a place where: •Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; •Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; •Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; •Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; •Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; •Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and •Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent landuses. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 61 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Goals for Transportation and Street Design 1.Automobile Traffic. Ensure safe and convenient travel for traffic passing through and within the Study Area by: •Reducing lane widths •Implementing intersection improvements at problem locations •Limiting the number of driveways providing access between the roadway system and private property •Vigorously enforcing traffic laws and regulations 2.Parking. Ensure adequate parking supplies that: •Are located on-site in accordance with specific land uses •Meet multi-modal parking needs •Are safe and secure 3.Walking, Biking and Transit. Design public rights-of-way to facilitate and encourage safe and convenient multi-modal travel by providing: •Sidewalks, boulevards, marked crosswalks, and pedestrian-oriented street lighting within the Study Area •Dedicated bikeways within the Study Area •Connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists to surrounding neighborhoods and destinations •Transit stops Policies for Transportation and Street Design 1. The City will coordinate with Mn/DOT on traffic improvements to Municipal State Aid (MSA) Streets. Recognizing that Valley View Road and 62nd Street are MSA streets, the City will coordinate with Mn/DOT on the design and implementation of public improvements within the rights-of-way of these two streets. Improvements should include: •Travel Lane Width and Bikeways on Valley View Road. Study the feasibility of reducing the width of travel lanes on Valley View Road, west of Wooddale Avenue, to 11 feet, as shown on Figure 5.3. (As shown on Figure 5.2, existing lane widths on Valley View Road are 17 feet in each direction.) By reducing the width of lanes on Valley View Road, traffic will be forced to drive a comparatively slower speeds and more cautiously than it does with wider lanes. The reduction in lane widths will also allow the introduction of dedicated bike lanes or sharrow markings on Valley View Road. 62 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Figure 5.3 Valley View Road Illustrative of Long-Range Policy Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 63 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design •Intersection Improvements at 62nd, Oaklawn and Valley View. Study the feasibility of improving the intersection of 62nd Street, Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road to reduce conflicts between northbound left-turning vehicles and westbound south-turning vehicles. An example of how this intersection might be improved is shown in Figure 5.4, which illustrates the elimination of a direct connection between Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road. It also shows a remnant parcel that would be created and an existing pedestrian linkage that would be maintained. 2. The City will work to improve safety throughout the Study Area. •Reduction of Driveways: Where feasible, as future development occurs, encourage the sharing of driveways across property lines and ensure that future developments are only allowed the minimum number of driveways necessary to provide convenient and safe ingress and egress. •Enforcement: Increase enforcement of existing traffic safety laws (e.g., speed, tailgating, coming to a complete stop at Stop signs, yielding to pedestrians, etc.) to improve safety. 3. The City will work to ensure appropriate configuration, size and location of parking supplies. Current parking supplies at the Edina Village Market and the ValleyWood Center typically exceed current parking demand. Recognizing that this may change in the future as development occurs, the following parking- related policies should be adopted. •Commercial Parking: Commercial parking should be behind or along-side the buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to encourage an active streetscape. •Residential Parking: Residential parking should be located under the buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions. •Flexible Parking Ratios: Parking ratios that reflect residents’ increasing use of transit service should be applied to new residential developments. •Pedestrian and Bike Amenities. All parking lots should include clearly identified pedestrian pathways between the parking lot and building entrances. Parking lots should also include parking facilities for bikes that are located near entrances in order to give cyclists a competitive advantage over drivers. Figure 5.4: Alternative #3 of 3; Oaklawn, 62nd and Valley View Intersection Study. This alternative shows the elimination of a direct connection from Oaklawn Avenue to Valley View Road. Full study found in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV. 64 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Figure 5.5 Wooddale Avenue Illustrative of Long-Range Policy Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 65 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 4. The City will work to ensure adequate facilities for walking, biking and transit use. Providing facilities for pedestrians, transit riders and cyclists that offer sufficient levels of comfort, convenience and safety will make it easier and more practical for alternative travel modes to be used. Where necessary, the City will need to coordinate with Mn/DOT or other agencies such as Metro Transit to implement the following improvements. In some cases the City and property owners will be able to act alone. The public improvements described below are illustrated in Figures 5.3 and 5.5, which are both illustrative cross-sections of Wooddale Avenue (north of Valley View Road) and Valley View Road (west of Wooddale Avenue). These section should to be compared Figures 5.1 and 5.2, which show existing conditions in the same locations. Figure 5.6 - Public Realm Improvements shows the location of the following improvements in the Study Area: •Crosswalks. Complete the crosswalks at the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, connecting all four corners. •Sidewalks along Wooddale Avenue. Construct a new sidewalk and tree- planted boulevard on the west side of Wooddale Avenue between Fairfax Avenue and Valley View Road. Construct a sidewalk on either the west or east side of Wooddale Avenue (or both sides), south of Valley View Road, consistent with the installation of pedestrian-scaled street lighting. •Install Pedestrian-Scaled Street Lighting. Pedestrian-oriented street lighting has been installed along Valley View Road, east of Wooddale Avenue. Install new pedestrian-scaled street lighting within the Study Area consistently throughout the entire node. Extend lighting to a point on Wooddale 150 feet south of Valley View Road (approximately one-half block). •Construct a Sidewalk along Valley View Road. Construct a new sidewalk and boulevard on the north side of Valley View Road between Wooddale Avenue and St. Johns Avenue and further west as appropriate. •Provide Bus Shelters. Coordinate with Metro Transit and adjacent property owners to provide bus shelters that will protect transit riders from inclement weather at the locations with the Study Area where passengers board and alight Routes 6B, 6U, and 587. •Construct Boulevards. Boulevards should be developed along the east and west sides of Wooddale Avenue between the sidewalks and the curbs. •Plant Boulevards. Boulevards within the Study Area should be planted with a variety of trees that grow to a height of less than 30 feet. •Bicycle Lanes: Construct a pair of bicycle lanes on Valley View Road between Wooddale Avenue and St. Johns Avenue and further west as appropriate. 66 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 5. The City will employ Living Streets principles and other established best practices in all improvements. The Small Area Plan process, and this Small Area Plan document does not set specific performance standards for public realm improvements. Upon any improvement, a formal design process will be necessary that ensures the use of best practices in regards to established practice in the community such as: •Community aesthetic or thematic preferences; •Sustainable materials; •Energy conservation and carbon reduction goals; •District stormwater management; •City of Edina’s Living Streets principles and policies; •Safe Routes to School (SRTS) principles and policies. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 67 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design Figure 5.6 Public Realm Improvements 68 | Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design 5.4 Implementation Steps Table 5B - Implementation Steps for Transportation and Street Design Action Leads Time Frame Install and maintain crosswalks Engineering Department 2015 Provide bus shelters Community Development Department, Metro Transit, property owners 2016 Study addition of bicycle lanes on Valley View Road Engineering Department City to consider with future CIP planning as budgets and priorities allow Study addition of sidewalk on north side of Valley View Road Engineering Department Study addition of sidewalk on west side of Wooddale Avenue Engineering Department Study installation of street lighting on Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue Engineering Department Study construction of boulevards Engineering Department Investigate travel lane width reductions on Valley View Road Engineering Department Study intersection improvements at Valley View/62nd/Oaklawn intersection. Implement related Valley View Road improvements within period specified in CIP. Engineering Department 2018 Consolidate or otherwise reduce number of driveways Community Development and Engineering As redevelopment occurs Implement policy regarding commercial parking Community Development Department When Comprehensive Plan is updated Implement policy regarding residential parking Community Development Department When Comprehensive Plan is updated Develop policy on flexible parking ratios Community Development When Comprehensive Plan is updated Update City of Edina Sidewalk Plan Community Development and Engineering When Comprehensive Plan is updated Increase enforcement within the Study Area Police Department Ongoing Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page | 69 r 1I okPe - , RESOLUTION NO. 2017-102 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO EXPAND THE NN, NEIGHBORHOOD NODE DISTRICT TO INCLUDE 6108, 6112, 6116 AND 6120 KELLOGG AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Edina Flats LLC is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a project that would include construction of 18 units of owner occupied housing at 4404&4416 Valley View Road, and 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. 1.02 The purpose of the request is to re-develop the city owned property at 4416 Valley View Road the vacant property on the corner of Kellogg), the row of parking for the commercial development to the west,the vacant parcel at 6120 Kellogg and the three single-family home parcels at 6116, 6112 and 6108 Kellogg. (See page Ala.) This portion of the development would include a 3-story condo building with six units on the corner, and three 2-story condo/townhome buildings to the north. 1.03 Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to expand the Neighborhood Commercial District to include 6108,6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue.These lots are currently guided LDR, Low Density Residential. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to expand the NN, Neighborhood Node District to include 6108,6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. 1.05 On September 27, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.Vote: 9 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.06 On October 3,2017,the City Council held a public hearing on the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The density of the project is half of what would be allowed in the NN, Neighborhood Node district. The four single-family home lots are being replaced with three, three unit buildings. 2. The units would be two-stories and 30 feet tall in height to match the maximum height alfowed i1L the R-11 CIT OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street•Edina,Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov•952- 927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO.2017-102 Page 2 3. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan: a. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting,and street furnishings (benches,trash receptacles, etc.) A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/ or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate,building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front fagade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. h. Height limits near the center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley View Road,building heights may be up to three stories,not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories,not to exceed 48 feet. i. Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family RESOLUTION NO.2017-102 Page 3 areas are important(as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories,not to exceed 24 feet. j. Establish universally accessible sidewalks along all edges of all spaces. k. Plant trees along the edges of all streets and spaces to provide shade and protection for pedestrians moving next to and in and out of buildings. 1. Gentle Transition from Node to Neighborhood. Whether the site is used for commercial or residential development, landscaping, screening and building height should be designed to help the building serve as an end cap for the residential block next to Valley View Road. The building height limit in this location is two stories. m. Encourage Underground Parking. Residents' parking should be located under the buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions. n. Commercial parking should be behind or along-side the buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to encourage an active streetscape. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE,it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina,approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows,subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Chapter 4,the Preferred Land Use Plan including Figure 4.3,Building Heights Limit is amended to include the following: Im Ica Tianii 11 vim R4F.r; Neighborhood Node Boundary JP 1p ID I Garrison Lane Neighborhood Node (2 stories & 30 feet) 222 ftWdll RESOLUTIO- O. 2018-26 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM R-I, PCD-4 and APD to PCD-I, AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR EDINA FLATS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Edina Flats LLC is proposing to build 18 units of owner occupied housing at 4404 & 4416 Valley View Road, and 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. 1.02 The purpose of the request is to re-develop the city owned property at 4416 Valley View Road (the vacant property on the corner of Kellogg), the row of parking for the commercial development to the west, the vacant parcel at 6120 Kellogg and the three single-family home parcels at 6116, 6112 and 6108 Kellogg. This portion of the development would include a 3-story condo building with six units on the corner, and three 2-story condo/townhome buildings to the north. The property at 4404 Valley View Road would be re-developed with a four-unit, two story condo building. The existing structure would be removed. 1.03 The property is 1.27 acres in size. The density proposed in the project would be 14 units per acre. (18 units total.) This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as NN, Neighborhood Node, which allows up to 30 units per acre in this area. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: Lots 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Block 21 Fairfax Addition Hennepin County, MN & Lots 11 and 12, Block 22 Fairfax Addition Hennepin County, MN 1.05 To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1) Final Rezoning from R-1, PCD-4 and APD to PCD-1, Planned Commercial Development, Preliminary Development Plan. 1.06 On October 3, 2017, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, a Conditional Use Permit to allow multi-family residential use, and Variances. The Conditional Use Permit and Variances were conditioned on obtaining Final Rezoning. 1.07 The applicant has submitted Final Plans that are consistent with the approved Preliminary Plans. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO, 2018-26 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2,01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Zoning would be consistent with the predominant Zoning District (PCD-1) in this area. The PCD-1 Zoning would be consistent over the majority of the NN, Neighborhood Node District. 2, The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that the existing traffic generated from the project would be supported by the existing roads. 3. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 4. The project is consistent with the Valley View and Wooddale Small Area Plan, Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning from R-1, PCD-4 and APD to PCD-1, Planned Commercial Development and Final Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 20, 2017; including the requirement of a Site Improvement Performance Agreement to be done with the re-plat, vacation of existing easements if needed, construction of a boulevard style sidewalk on Oaklawn to connect to the Valley View Road sidewalk, 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments 4404 Valley View Rd Rezoning Better Together Edina Project: 4404 Valley View Road Rezoning No Responses VISITORS 3 CONTRIBUTORS 0 RESPONSES 0 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2023-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-25, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-25, AT 4404 VALLEY VIEW ROAD The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-517 Planned Unit Development District-25 (PUD-25) – 4404 Valley View Road (a) Legal description: Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax Addition, Hennepin County, Minn. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the approved development plans dated June 27, 2022 for the site approved by the City on September 7, 2022 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2022-72 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. The site must be developed in conformance with these plans. (c) Principal Uses: Multiresidential (d) Accessory Uses: None (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development/Site Standards. The following shall apply in addition to and per the approved Site Plan with Variances in Resolution No. 2022-72: Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: April 4, 2023 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send one affidavit of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Proposed (Measured from building to the lot line) Front – Oaklawn Front – Valley View Road Side – North Rear – West 20 feet 10 feet 7 feet 5 feet Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet RESOLUTION NO. 2023-26 APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REZONING OF 4404 VALLEY VIEW ROAD FROM PCD-1, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PUD-25, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 25 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 City Homes and the City of Edina are requesting a rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the property at 4404 Valley View Road. 1.02 This site received a Conditional Use Permit to allow the multiresidential land use in 2017, and in 2022 received Site Plan approval with variances to build a four-unit townhome/rowhome project. The purpose of this request is to rezone the property to the intended long-term use of the site, residential, and not allow commercial uses in the future. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax Addition, Hennepin County Minn. (4404 Valley View Road) 1.04 On March 29, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of the request. Vote: 9 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.05 On April 4, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning would not allow traditional PCD-1 commercial land uses on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD Rezoning outlined in Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The rezoning would codify the approved site plan with variances as being the only development allowed on the property, unless a zoning ordinance amendment is granted by the City Council. 4. The project will provide missing middle housing. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-26 Page 2 5. The proposal specifically addresses two of the guiding principles of the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan (SAP) are as follows: Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands. Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node. Additionally, the SAP specifically refers to the site as follows: The approved site plan and use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as “Neighborhood Node.” The description of uses includes “small- to moderate scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings, serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood.” “Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential.” The building density would be 15 units per acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan allows between 12-30 units per acre. 6. Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the site. 7. Will not result in an overly intensive land use. Conditional Use Permit for the use, and Site Plan with Variances have already been approved for the site. 8. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, grants final approval of the proposed Rezoning. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed per the approved development plans dated June 27, 2022 approved by the City on September 7, 2022 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2022-72 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must be consistent with the approved landscape plan dated June 27, 2022. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. All the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2022-72 approving the site plan with variances must be met. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-26 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 4, 2023. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2023-26 DENYING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REZONING OF 4404 VALLEY VIEW ROAD FROM PCD-1, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PUD-25, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 25 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 City Homes and the City of Edina are requesting a rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development for the property at 4404 Valley View Road. 1.02 This site received a Conditional Use Permit to allow the multiresidential land use in 2017, and in 2022 received Site Plan approval with variances to build a four-unit townhome/rowhome project. The purpose of this request is to rezone the property to the intended long-term use of the site, residential, and not allow commercial uses in the future. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax Addition, Hennepin County Minn. (4404 Valley View Road) 1.04 On March 29, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of the request. Vote: 9 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.05 On April 4, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The approved 4-unit multiresidential project for this site conforms to the PCD-1 Zoning District through the approved Conditional Use Permit allowing an all-residential development, and the approved Site Plan with Variances. 2. The approved project conforms to the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan. 3. Any future primary use of the property for commercial use would need to comply with Chapter 36 of the Zoning ordinance regarding performance standards for commercial uses including parking regulations. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-26 Page 2 Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the proposed Rezoning to PUD. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 4, 2023. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk The CITY ofEDINA Rezoning –4404 Valley View Road The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 2 Site The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 3 Site The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 4 Site The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 5 Site The CITY ofEDINABackground for this request EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY ofEDINAThis Request Requires: EdinaMN.gov 7 Rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Residential Development The CITY ofEDINAPrimary Issue EdinaMN.gov 8 • Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? The CITY ofEDINAPrimary Issue EdinaMN.gov 9 • Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed rezoning would not allow traditional PCD-1 commercial land uses on the site. Concern was raised with the review of the Subdivision regarding the future use of the approved residential use on the site. The city attorney has advised that a rezoning to PUD would be the proper method to ensure no PCD-1 commercial uses. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning as outlined on pages 2-5 of the staff report. The approved townhome project would provide a more appropriate land use transition from the single-dwelling units to the north and east to the more commercial area at the Valley View and Wooddale intersection. The project will provide “missing middle” type housing option identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The CITY ofEDINAPrimary Issue EdinaMN.gov 10 • Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? 3. The proposal specifically addresses two of the guiding principles of the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan (SAP) are as follows: “Housing. Sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands.” “Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. Graceful transitions should be maintained from more active areas to quieter neighborhood streets immediately beyond the node.” The CITY ofEDINAPrimary Issue EdinaMN.gov 11 • Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? 4. The approved site plan and use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as “Neighborhood Node.” The description of uses includes “small-to moderate scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings, serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood.” “Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential.” The building density would be 15 units per acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan allows between 12-30 units per acre. 5. The PUD rezoning ensures that the approved site with variances for the 4-unit row home development is the only development allowed on the site, unless the City Council approves an Ordinance Amendment that would allow a different development. The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 12 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-25, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-25, AT 4404 VALLEY VIEW ROAD The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-517 Planned Unit Development District-25 (PUD-25) – 4404 Valley View Road (a) Legal description: Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax Addition, Hennepin County, Minn. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the approved development plans dated June 27, 2022 for the site approved by the City on September 7, 2022 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2022-72 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: Multiresidential (d) Accessory Uses: None (e) Conditional Uses: None (f) Development/Site Standards. The following shall apply in addition to and per the approved Site Plan with Variances in Resolution No. 2022-72: Proposed (Measured from building to the lot line) Front – Oaklawn Front – Valley View Road Side – North Rear – West 20 feet 10 feet 7 feet 5 feet Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY ofEDINABetter Together EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY ofEDINAStaff & Planning Commission Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 17 Buildable Area The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 18 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 19 2018 Approved Overall Development Plan Site CUP Approved for 4 units on the subject site Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-20, Certificate of Appropriateness Appeal, 4630 Drexel Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, April 10 and to continue action on the item to the April 18 City Council Meeting. INTRODUCTION: Scott Busyn, the applicant, is appealing the denial of an amended Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The proposed COA amendment was for approval of the rebuilt chimney (as the chimney is built today) without the previously approved stone detailing. The Heritage Preservation Commission heard the amendment request at their January 9, 2023, meeting, and the certificate of appropriateness amendment approving the rebuilt chimney on June 14, 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-20: Certificate of Appropriateness Appeal Applicant Appeal Letter January 9, 2023 COA Amendment Submittal, Staff Report, Consultant Memo, Minutes June 14, 2022 COA Amendment Rebuilt Chimney-Applicant Submittal, Minutes Site Location Map Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Presentation HPC Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2023-20 DENYING AN AMENDED COA REQUEST TO APPROVE THE REBUILT CHIMNEY WITHOUT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED STONE DETAILING AT 4630 DREXEL AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. is requesting an amendment to a previously approved certificate of appropriateness amendment to eliminate decorative stone detailing around the chimney at 4630 Drexel Avenue. The originally approved certificate of appropriateness amendment included the decorative stone detailing on the rebuilt chimney. 1.02 On, January 9, 2023, the Heritage Preservation Commission held a meeting and denied the COA amendment request. Vote: 7 Ayes 0 Nay. 1.03 The Heritage Preservation Commission decision was appealed to the City Council on January 19, 2023. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: LOT 16, BLOCK 7, COUNTRY CLUB FAIRWAY SECTION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1.05 On April 4, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Denial is based on the following findings: 2.02 The original chimney on the home at 4630 Drexel Avenue had the decorative stone element and the chimney had to be rebuilt due to structural issues and for safety reasons. 2.03 The decorative stone element of the chimney was shown on the approved plans and was discussed specifically with the certificate of appropriateness amendment approval for the rebuilt chimney in June 2022. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the appeal of the decision of the heritage preservation commission on certificate of appropriateness amendment at 4630 Drexel Avenue based on the findings above. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-20 Page 2 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 18, 2023. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 18, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk March 29, 2023 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and City Council, I am writing you to request that you approve the amended COA for 4630 Drexel Avenue to not install the faux fireplace detail on the chimney. We requested that the HPC approve this amendment to the COA at the 1/9/23 HPC meeting per the attached submittal. The homeowner, Mr. David Petrocchi, liked how the chimney looked as built without the stone surround as it is a clean look and consistent with the historic character of other Spanish Colonial chimneys in the neighborhood. Here is the completed project: As a nearby resident and longtime builder in the neighborhood, I agree with his assessment. The original faux fireplace was poorly executed, damaged by lack of maintenance, and was painted over by the previous homeowner. We cannot find white stones from our stone supplier and do not want to use painted stones on a newly renovated home. Here Is the original chimney: After the COA amendment was denied by the HPC, we decided to appeal the decision based on the following reasons: 1. The project at 4630 Drexel as built meets the POT and the Secretary of Interior Standards. Per the 1/2/23 memo from Consultant Robert Vogel to the HPC: “As built, the project meets the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation, which are the required basis for COA design review. While the exterior chimney is considered architectural character-defining feature of the house, the presence or absence of the outdoor fireplace does not represent a substantial façade alteration—these kinds of minor changes are allowed by the standards for rehabilitation and are not discussed in the district plan of treatment. My recommendation is to approve the project as built, with a note to the COA file documenting the fact that the fireplace described in the plans submitted with the COA application was not built.” In fact, removal of siding is allowed by the Plan of Treatment. Removal of this stone siding detail would not require a COA if it was being done by a homeowner on their own. 2. Similar and more dramatic changes from the original COA on two other recently completed homes were allowed by the HPC at the same 1/9/23 meeting. 4510 Sunnyside Proposed Elevation: 4510 Sunnyside As Built approved by HPC (dormer change) 4604 Browndale Proposed 4604 Browndale As Built Approved by the HPC (no stone surround on door from original home) For the record, I have no issues or complaints about these other homes. They are beautifully done and fit the neighborhood. 3. What is going on with the 4630 Drexel property leaves the inference the HPC is violating our equal protection rights. We believe certain member(s) of the HPC hold bias against our company and practiced selective complaints/enforcement of the POT on 4630 Drexel vs other projects in the District. The deviations on other properties should have been caught during the final inspection whether a complaint was made or not. Selective enforcement based upon the presence of a single complaint is arbitrary and capricious For these reasons, we are asking for you to please approve the amended COA for 4630 Drexel. Thank you for your consideration, Scott Busyn Great Neighborhood Homes Cc: David Petrocchi Petrocchi Residence 4630 Drexel Avenue December 9th, 2022 Dear Heritage Preservation Commission, We are requesting the approval of a certificate of appropriateness for the home as completed at 4630 Drexel Avenue without the stone fireplace surround on the chimney. As long time residents and builder/remodeler of homes in the District, we appreciate the importance of maintaining the historic character of the neighborhood. We have successfully worked with the HPC on 8 projects in the District without any issues. Here are examples of our work in the neighborhood: 4615 Wooddale 4620 Moorland 4505 Arden The renovation of 4630 Drexel Avenue maintained the importance form elements and street facing facades of the original home. These elements include the original roof on the main body of the home, the façade facing Country Club Road, and the façade facing Drexel Avenue. The addition elements maintain the matching roof pitch, stucco elements, and barrel tile roof. I agree we did not install the fake fireplace stones on the chimney facing Country Club Road. We were unsure they were required since the fireplace insert was not approved. In reading the HPC motion again, I do see the COA was approved with the requirement of the stone surround on the fake fireplace. In addition, the original chimney stones were painted white (actually the entire house stucco as painted white). We can not find white stones and do not want to use painted stones on a newly renovated home. The homeowner liked how the chimney looked without the stone surround as it is a clean look and consistent with the historic character of other Spanish Colonial chimneys in the neighborhood. The chimney is located on his outside terrace. The lower portion of chimney is obscured by his terrace furniture and will eventually be completely hidden once the arborvitae grow in. Here are other similar chimneys on Spanish Colonial Homes in the neighborhood that show a similar chimney without a fake fireplace. These similar homes show that our chimney reflects the character of the neighborhood in architectural form and finish. Thank you for considering this request. Scott Busyn Great Neighborhood Homes January 9, 2023 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Amendment to COA H-20-6, 4630 Drexel Avenue, As-built Elevations, Changes to Rebuilt Chimney Information / Background: The subject property, 4630 Drexel Avenue is located on the northwest corner of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road. The home built in 1924 is a Mediterranean style. A certificate of appropriateness for the project at 4630 Drexel Avenue was approved September 8, 2020. One of the conditions of the original COA was that asphalt shingles were not an allowable roofing material. At that time, the applicant was agreeable to that condition. The original COA listed Brava Tile, Decra Tile or Clay Tile as options for the approved roofing material. The property owner requested an amendment to the original COA June 2022 for a change in the approved roofing materials and the rebuilding of the original chimney that needed to come down for safety reasons. The HPC denied the change in roofing materials and approved the reconstruction of the chimney without the addition of an exterior gas fireplace insert. The approved chimney was to be finished in stucco and stone fireplace surround per the schematic to match the original structure. Staff inspected the site when a final inspection was requested by the permit holder and staff received complaints of the project not being completed and notified the permit holder that the following items were outstanding: • Fireplace stone detailing • Garage doors needed painting The contractor notified staff that the garage doors will be painted when the weather permits. The property owner and applicant’s request is for the HPC to approve a COA amendment to the original COA approving the changes to the rebuilt fireplace and approving the fireplace without stone detailing, as it is currently built today. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Primary Issue: The Heritage Preservation Commission is asked to review the applicants request-reviewing the chimney as it is built today, without the stone detailing. The objective of the Country Club Landmark District is preservation of the existing historic house facades and streetscapes. The city has adopted the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation when reviewing certificate of appropriateness applications. The secretary of the interior defines preservation as the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity, and materials of an historic property. The secretary of the interior defines rehabilitation as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. Staff believes the following standards of rehabilitation are pertinent to the review of the amendment to COA H-20-6: • Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. • Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. • New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Preservation Consultant Vogel reviewed the application and has written a memo that is attached in the heritage preservation commission packet. Consultant Vogel notes that in his opinion, the project meets the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation. While the exterior chimney is considered an architectural character defining feature of the house, the presence or absence of the outdoor fireplace (stone detailing) does not represent a substantial façade alteration-and this kind of minor change is allowed by the standards of rehabilitation. Staff Recommendation & Findings: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to COA H-20-6 approving the chimney as it is built today, without the stone detailing as shown on the COA elevations approved with the rebuilt chimney. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The absence of the stonework detailing does not represent a substantial façade alteration and minor changes in detail are allowed by the standards for rehabilitation. 2. The chimney, as built, meets the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation. Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner FROM: Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant DATE: January 2, 2023 SUBJECT: Amendment to COA for 4630 Drexel Avenue I have reviewed the information provided by the applicant regarding final approval of the project as built (specifically the omission of the outdoor fireplace at the base of the chimney, as shown on the plans submitted with the COA approved by the HPC). As built, the project meets the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation, which are the required basis for COA design review. While the exterior chimney is considered architectural character-defining feature of the house, the presence or absence of the outdoor fireplace does not represent a substantial façade alteration—these kinds of minor changes are allowed by the standards for rehabilitation and are not discussed in the district plan of treatment. My recommendation is to approve the project as built, with a note to the COA file documenting the fact that the fireplace described in the plans submitted with the COA application was not built. 4630 Drexel Ave Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, © WSB & Associates 2013 January 5, 2023 0 50 10025 ft 0 10 205 m 1:394 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 2/13/23 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, January 9, 2023 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Schilling, Commissioners Cundy, Everson, Nymo, Hassenstab, Pollock, Kmetz-Sheehy, and student member Varadhan and Maheshwari. Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Kmetz-Sheehy, to approve the meeting agenda moving item C under Reports/Recommendations to item A. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Cundy, seconded Nymo, to approve the December 13, 2022, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. H-23-1: 4909 Bruce Avenue- New Detached Garage Liaison Bodeker gave background information on the house and the COA request made for the new detached garage that was denied by the Commission in December. The homeowner gave overview of changes that were made to the COA from the original COA request from December. Commissioners Nymo and Cundy discussed that both designs would be outliers to the aesthetic of the neighborhood, specifically the roof form. The Commission discussed the height of the dormers, roof form, and consistency and asked questions of staff relating to Robert Vogel’s opinion on the requested COA. Commissioner Hassenstab recommended a design review session to review and determine sketch plans. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 2/13/23 Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Hassenstab, to continue this COA to February’s agenda. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. H-19-3: 4604 Browndale Ave COA Amendment Liaison Bodeker updated on the COA request that was approved by the Commission in May 2019 and explained the amendment to the original COA. The Commission discussed the As-Built elevations of the property and asked questions of staff relating to open permits, façade, and rubric. Commissioner Cundy discussed precedents in place to uphold COA requests. Motion made by Kmetz-Sheehy, seconded by Pollock, to approve the COA amendment as submitted. Commissioners Everson, Hassenstab, Pollock, and Kmetz-Sheehy voted aye. Commissioner Cundy and Schilling voted nay. Commissioner Nymo abstained. The motion carried. C. H-20-8: 4510 Sunnyside Road COA Amendment Liaison Bodeker gave an update on the property and the existing COA that was approved by the Commission in October 2020. Liaison Bodeker updated that the as-built elevations do not match the approved elevations from the original COA. Motion made by Nymo, seconded by Kmetz-Sheehy, to approve the COA amendment as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. D. H-20-6: 4630 Drexel Ave COA Amendment Liaison Bodeker gave background information on the property and the COA request that was approved by the Commission in September 2020. Liaison Bodeker updated that there were complaints received concerning garage doors, stonework, and reconstruction of the chimney at the final inspection. The Commission discussed materiality, street-facing façade, stonework on the chimney and asked questions of staff relating to why the stonework not included, Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Hassenstab, to deny the COA amendment as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. VII. Chair and Member Comments: Chair Shilling discussed conversations with St. Steven’s Church concerning landmark designation. VIII. Staff Comments: Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 2/13/23 Liaison Bodeker stated that there are 3 volunteers needed for City Code and Plan of Treatment Work Plan sub-committee. Commissioner Lonnquist would like to stay on the sub-committee. Commissioner Pollock and Cundy volunteered to join sub-committee. Liaison Bodeker updated that the next HPC meeting will take place on Monday, February 13, 2023, at 7:00pm. IX. Adjournment Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Hassenstab, to adjourn the meeting at 9:37 pm. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker APO C cAA Sub vn itedt Scott Busyn Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. 3939 West 50th Street, Suite 103A Edina, MN 55424 May 4, 2022 Heritage Preservation Commission c/o Emily Bodeker — Assistant City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Deteriorated Chimney at 4630 Drexel Avenue Thank you to Chief Building Official Dave Fisher and yourself for meeting us at the 4630 Drexel Avenue job site to review the existing chimney. Recapping our discussion, we pointed out to you and Dave that the existing chimney was structurally unstable due to decades of water intrusion from the top of the chimney and improper flashing. We pointed out that the structural brick was mushy and crumbly throughout the chimney structure. There were also structural cracks throughout the chimney. One of our workers stated he could move the chimney by leaning on it while working on the roof. Dave Fisher inspected the chimney and ruled that the chimney was structurally unsafe and should be removed due to it being a hazard. I attached photos of the deterioration as well as an inspection report from the mid-1980s (source Edina Historical House Record Card) that that basement had a "Severe, very noticeable water problem, very frightening to a prospective buyer." The inspection report also stated the windows had "some rotted wood." Dave Fisher also stated at the meeting that he would be issuing a recap of his observations. Our plans are to rebuild the chimney to the exact measurements per the attached schematic drafted by DFP Planning and Design (attached). The chimney will be reconstructed with framing materials and finished with stucco and stone fireplace surround per the schematic to match the original structure. The homeowner will be installing an exterior gas fireplace in the location of the fireplace surround as this area will be landscaped as an exterior terrace per the survey. The homeowner will also be planting trees to create privacy for the terrace. Obviously, removing and rebuilding this chimney creates significant unintended costs for the homeowner. The intent of replacing the chimney is to create a safe and functional structure while making a compatible use of the chimney that meets the objectives of Edina's Historic Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Cc: Dave Fisher — Chief Building Official SECOND FLOOR CEIL. STD. WINDOW & DOOR HT. TZ3 SECOND FLOOR lir ft FIRST FLOOR CEIL. ii wr i TP STD. WINDOW & DR. RT. KC sum/ — lb- 0 Inumr_ A immuli MEW r el, iii,. . m I I i : FIRST FLOOR BASEMENT CEIL. -H 5ID.E•,DETAILr arxs. FRONT DETAIL Alopopv ez1 c,v\ or•Av`-c/1., ckvA tag age: 05- C9 Zrr 11 yt 0: 24•• IL <4. 6 DO a 0. 02 00 City of Edina MATERIALS, DUMPSTERS AAA rAmmz AND PORTABLE TOILETS neon., MAI SHALL NOT BE STORED IN 7 • .., grak A A ,„,,,,,„,, i mu. la • smut 00213, •—• 1••••M mmemenooms. Lama MI • . N.......EIMPAAS 12.......51OPMIIKBO RIGHT-OF-WAY THE Ei- MR 202.,214 I MB Coe ROM yorr 11212 WV O) “.2. 4,x2,2222 • ri....*.' trarr. nose vow' ••••• - .---. _.41:11.---2., irp.- ,..4 ••••••br tx24.• THIS PLAN MUST BE ,..-1111... 4, un • 12 ra MAT We , -3-7 4t %..., 62r 2 MAINTAINED AND FA ACCESSIBLE ON THE I Ili MEM ' "---- ii c NIB in MS •E 4 . EN 1: maw II n NE lo I 1 .... :: ,.. 12221.1.22 2100....... ii :: .... :: :: ._ All. NM MO— ; ' ti" 411 W CONSTRUCTION SITE 11111111111 111111111 11 11111111111 —Mr MO ma I L.', 4. 1111111111111111111 Cuff .. .. . In 4 il .111 III I Iiii fl ...... ii ii ...... n .. .• .. .. .. .. •• En •• MI MIII VI n DM tilt# et:zog < LL • _^::111-1111 I:jail/ YTt2....01 0.22.0 V rumumo LEFT Pew Ima tm• ELEVATION Am. CUB, MK. — CONCO 10 20.2220 PA .2. MOM VS.. Val REAR MO COOR OM ELEVATION cm.1 1111 In , 111,01 MOT. OT21.0.2L...... a ....5 MOO OC4L,1/2. • 1...r ....• .2. MOM MO 0001111.14 rl..2 ST n,,,.. MX,. T r61.22 CAP RIGHT ELEVATION 1 MINIMUM REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION ../712,22 vorr l'\ 11.-ocamx MI ...K..' • J'm Eos INg ---......--....------... IMOD OF HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OF ROOF FRAME New ROOM PITCH il STATE ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR ARTA -IT TORE IN . a PEAK To MATCH EXISTING & .t John Dmmrsso, .r.121200•1717. ' ,,R RIDGE __— Ei% 76340S-5015 FA-F 71s3mmIAMIarn A • • 2,2 tr-LC 211.2) 11,04.err.'I II IIIITL _ --. ; !g SCPARATE PM. REQ.. Of • ... rur Ram Mr) -- '''''' 14 ,....... "...... I, IMMO FLOM CM • • OX A.. ---ree SW. ••10o• . p .m, , II II i Star II IN - II DEO. :-. 11 11 II MI II ,—,..-- 1111 — a mm. MN II MON SAM IL ARAM ANAT 1,204 emote NO.224 VTOL) 82,2001.1.0121 U---- 'qgsikii :ora. I ----- . 1.120,20012 MIL ..1 .....------ ........-2...:....-- .,..----',..„ .-........Th ..1 ME .. ............., r . li MOWN • OR i• ME ME ME „„„„„„„„,„,„„, .• .... IV. =1.1•OT r.4 r— rr- tot r_________T 00.4[212 Lel 0 WV DAMES, 1171 Z . II I 1 " Minimum cumnistIng -I" high, building 'V..... as RMA FRONT ELEVATION MAI c•T4 Q_ I II 6 nece ea, address visl We frum numbers, the sheet 242.1/4. • ILO. 3 m,m rt *i 111,11111111111111111M lull .g. MCI ulrud on the building Pgriir'',71-. oar. wee pamAseM ;4 .4 Cr] CON 2.2.1.2. ..........,....... TOTAL 1:4 an IKERATMEIM,Ml --qz 1e•12.2151,1•2020.1 Il , 6., 13111 1. .. It. C.) .4 .01•122/31,240 IRE ArPROXILKIe NV sm re. , ill -4" ..-.1 I MEI '-.7: it prim. C:) c3z 1:4 cog' tall'11 2.241/07 TO .1. ,,,,,....,,,,,, ''' Pa EI AllII r•T4 11 11 .40 P4I 5RACKET DETAILS EXTERIOR NOTES I n , ..... In. • MOO12~21 MA.MIINI umr, WS OW .......5•17-21 • 2.16.02IT 1,22124> TO 2C NOTI212212 ISMS. OT OWNS Y111.11.11/11- ‘2•12/22002 • QT2,2912 SW. me. TO WAIT 124T SI22.2.0 /VOW 124 TY Required follow to approved Certificate JP-1321.2111- .7,...,2, 111172•21120 FIRM 10 MOM. • CAPP.T12.1 TO FUSIN ALL 21121.221.11.2100212 It MOP MO SI 4 RC 222.210 WOO .,,,.. --- of Appropriateness. .1•112•11 EV aft 02241122001TO J.12,2(TY 1.13TI, 2.411110 I.024 ••0240 •4 'TR' 1/201 VW= • 0.12 EY. OW • OM •... Can not remove more than 50% of • 0111.202 TO MYR •122.24 WM LIOTIOIN2112.T202 -4,Ta", — —.--t— --.. exterior walls • r“ • •1420• Ira. 111.111”12222KAL OCITI 01 WM TIMM U. ....,• ., ,,,,, ,,,,, ,,, ,,,,,,,, ,..2,2,,,, • WO. 26.2 04420G MORS Changes, revisions or deviations from approved must be plans am FST FINMNINd NMIMB amAirosmas PX01112/...5T01 OW 11122045 21.1[AT WOK 13.000 WINDOW DETAILS submitted to and approved by the COM PM • acf.114.311 OAK. • 421.0112210T. 1......1.12221/0119 0211.1212C • new, V/ KIM : r..Zresar. aor use 21..L.2.1/7. • 1.-0. Z City before proposed work occrs. Failure to do so may result In enforcement action 2214= ilea BRIM.*Ram Draft Minutes Approved Minutes Approved Date: 7/121 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Tuesday, June 14, 2022 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Schilling, Commissioners, Cundy, Nymo, Hassenstab, Lonnquist and student member Maheshwari. Commissioner Everson walked in at 7:08 pm. Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker, Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel, City Attorney Dave Kendall, an Building Official David Fisher III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Nymo, seconded by Cundy to approve the meeting agenda moving item C to the f►rst item under reports and recommendation. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Cundy, seconded Hassenstab to approve the May 10, 2022, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations C. COA: 4506 Sunnyside Road Liaison Bodeker introduced the COA request for the demolition of an existing attached garage, construction of a detached garage and two-story addition at 4506 Sunnyside Road. Motion made by Lonnquist, seconded by Nymo to approve the COA request for a new detached garage and addition to the front façade as submitted. All voted aye. A. Update to COA H-20-6: 4630 Drexel Avenue, Changes to Building Material and Replacement of Chimney Draft Minutes Approved Minutes Approved Date: 7/I2/' Liaison Bodeker introduced the roofing material and chimney reconstruction requests. The property owner and contractor were in attendance to answer questions. Motion made by Hassenstab, seconded by Nymo to separate the actions outlined in the staff report. Taking separate action on the request for the roofing material and the chimney. All voted aye. The motion passed. Motion by Lonnquist, seconded by Hassenstab to deny the roofing material change request, allowing the original 3 materials as approved roofing material options. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Lonnquist to approve the reconstruction of the chimney as presented by the applicant, without the approval of the exterior gas insert. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. COA: 4909 Sunnyside Road Liaison Bodeker introduced the COA request to for changes to a street facing facade associated with a remodel that include a front porch and dormers. The applicant, the architect, Ryan Fish, and property owners were in attendance. Motion made by Hassenstab, seconded by Nymo to approve the certificate of appropriateness request as submitted by the applicant. Commissioners Nymo, Hassenstab, Lonnquist, and Schilling voted aye. Commissioner Cundy voted No. Commissioner Everson recused himself. The motion passed. VII. Chair and Member Comments: Commissioner Cundy had questions for the City Attorney surrounding HPC processes, code and the Country Club plan of treatment. VIII. Staff Comments: Liaison Bodeker reminded the HPC of the upcoming June 21, 2022 work session with the city council. IX. Adjournment Motion made by Cundy seconded by Hassenstab to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 pm. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emay Bacieker 4630 Drexel Ave Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, © WSB & Associates 2013 January 5, 2023 0 50 10025 ft 0 10 205 m 1:394 Project Report Better Together Edina Certificate of Appropriateness Applications Highlights TOTAL VISITS 4.6 k MAX VISITORS PER DAY 69 NEW REGISTRATI ONS 52 ENGAGED VISITORS 70 INFORMED VISITORS 1.3 k AWARE VISITORS 2.6 k Aware Participants 2,585 Aware Actions Performed Participants Visited a Project or Tool Page 2,585 Informed Participants 1,259 Informed Actions Performed Participants Viewed a video 0 Viewed a photo 0 Downloaded a document 1,000 Visited the Key Dates page 0 Visited an FAQ list Page 0 Visited Instagram Page 0 Visited Multiple Project Pages 696 Contributed to a tool (engaged)70 Engaged Participants 70 Engaged Actions Performed Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributed on Forums 68 0 0 Participated in Surveys 0 0 0 Contributed to Newsfeeds 0 0 0 Participated in Quick Polls 0 0 0 Posted on Guestbooks 2 0 0 Contributed to Stories 1 0 0 Asked Questions 0 0 0 Placed Pins on Places 0 0 0 Contributed to Ideas 0 0 0 Visitors Summary Pageviews Visitors Visits New Registrations 1 Jan '21 1 Jan '22 1 Jan '23 500 1000 1500 FORUM TOPIC Visitors 44 Contributors 4 CONTRIBUTIONS 11 05 January 23 Liz Olson AGREES 0 DISAGREES 2 REPLIES 0 28 February 23 Emily Bodeker AGREES 2 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 09 March 23 Liz Olson AGREES 0 DISAGREES 2 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 March 2023 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA This is Kathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel Ave. This request is how I feel about the stone detail on the chimney being left out and I am okay with that. I think the stone detail woul d actually hurt the way it looks. That's my impression and opinion and I wish you all a H appy New Year and a wonderful day. Thank you so much. (This voicemail was receive d 1/4/23 at 9:45AM and transcribed by City Staff) Hello this is Tracy Schaefer at 4627 Drexel Avenue responding to the letter I received t oday regarding the public hearing regarding the 4630 Drexel Avenue appeal of the Heri tage Preservation’s denial of the amendment regarding the rebuilt chimney without the previously approved stone detailing. Although the homeowner is a wonderful individual , Great Neighborhood homes is pushing the envelope again. They knew what needed t o be done when they submitted the plans and myself and other neighbors feel that the stone needs to be done. We’ve done remodeling and other neighbors in the neighborh ood have done remodeling and everyone else has to adhere to the preservation boards requirements. If it was not a requirement, it would not be a preservation district. So we would appreciate it if the appeal was denied again and the detailing needs to be put on the home. They’ve already, Great Neighborhood Homes has already been given too m uch leigh way and too many variances in other things. They know what is required whe n they entered these projects and they need to fulfill their end of the bargain and makin g sure that the home fits the neighborhood and without the stone it does not. The roof does not have the slate and there are many other things they have done where they ha ve gotten too much leigh way and someone needs to tell Great Neighborhood Homes t hey can’t continue to push the envelope in this neighborhood and in the City of Edina. Thank you. (This voicemail was received 2/28/23 at 10:22AM and transcribed by City S taff). Hi this is Cathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel. You're asking for my input regarding the re-b uilt chimney and I am okay with the re-built chimney as it is today without the previousl y approved stone detailing. Thank you for asking for my input. I wish you all well have a good weekend. Take care. Bye bye. (This voicemail was received 3/4/23 at 10:16 A M and transcribed by City Staff) Page 18 of 51 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 March 2023 FORUM TOPIC 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Page 19 of 51 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Visitors 44 Contributors 4 CONTRIBUTIONS 11 05 January 23 This is Kathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel Ave. This request is how I feel about the stone detail on the chimney being left out and I am okay with that. I think the stone detail woul d actually hurt the way it looks. That's my impression and opinion and I wish you all a H appy New Year and a wonderful day. Thank you so much. (This voicemail was receive d 1/4/23 at 9:45AM and transcribed by City Staff) Liz Olson AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 2 0 28 February 23 Hello this is Tracy Schaefer at 4627 Drexel Avenue responding to the letter I received t oday regarding the public hearing regarding the 4630 Drexel Avenue appeal of the Heri tage Preservation’s denial of the amendment regarding the rebuilt chimney without the previously approved stone detailing. Although the homeowner is a wonderful individual , Great Neighborhood homes is pushing the envelope again. They knew what needed t o be done when they submitted the plans and myself and other neighbors feel that the stone needs to be done. We’ve done remodeling and other neighbors in the neighborh ood have done remodeling and everyone else has to adhere to the preservation boards requirements. If it was not a requirement, it would not be a preservation district. So we would appreciate it if the appeal was denied again and the detailing needs to be put on the home. They’ve already, Great Neighborhood Homes has already been given too m uch leigh way and too many variances in other things. They know what is required whe n they entered these projects and they need to fulfill their end of the bargain and makin g sure that the home fits the neighborhood and without the stone it does not. The roof does not have the slate and there are many other things they have done where they ha ve gotten too much leigh way and someone needs to tell Great Neighborhood Homes t hey can’t continue to push the envelope in this neighborhood and in the City of Edina. Thank you. (This voicemail was received 2/28/23 at 10:22AM and transcribed by City S taff). Emily Bodeker AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 0 0 09 March 23 Hi this is Cathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel. You're asking for my input regarding the re-b uilt chimney and I am okay with the re-built chimney as it is today without the previousl y approved stone detailing. Thank you for asking for my input. I wish you all well have a good weekend. Take care. Bye bye. (This voicemail was received 3/4/23 at 10:16 A M and transcribed by City Staff) Liz Olson AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 2 00 2 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 March 2023 FORUM TOPIC 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Page 19 of 51 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Visitors 44 Contributors 4 CONTRIBUTIONS 11 05 January 23 This is Kathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel Ave. This request is how I feel about the stone detail on the chimney being left out and I am okay with that. I think the stone detail woul d actually hurt the way it looks. That's my impression and opinion and I wish you all a H appy New Year and a wonderful day. Thank you so much. (This voicemail was receive d 1/4/23 at 9:45AM and transcribed by City Staff) Liz Olson AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 2 0 28 February 23 Hello this is Tracy Schaefer at 4627 Drexel Avenue responding to the letter I received t oday regarding the public hearing regarding the 4630 Drexel Avenue appeal of the Heri tage Preservation’s denial of the amendment regarding the rebuilt chimney without the previously approved stone detailing. Although the homeowner is a wonderful individual , Great Neighborhood homes is pushing the envelope again. They knew what needed t o be done when they submitted the plans and myself and other neighbors feel that the stone needs to be done. We’ve done remodeling and other neighbors in the neighborh ood have done remodeling and everyone else has to adhere to the preservation boards requirements. If it was not a requirement, it would not be a preservation district. So we would appreciate it if the appeal was denied again and the detailing needs to be put on the home. They’ve already, Great Neighborhood Homes has already been given too m uch leigh way and too many variances in other things. They know what is required whe n they entered these projects and they need to fulfill their end of the bargain and makin g sure that the home fits the neighborhood and without the stone it does not. The roof does not have the slate and there are many other things they have done where they ha ve gotten too much leigh way and someone needs to tell Great Neighborhood Homes t hey can’t continue to push the envelope in this neighborhood and in the City of Edina. Thank you. (This voicemail was received 2/28/23 at 10:22AM and transcribed by City S taff). Emily Bodeker AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 0 0 09 March 23 Hi this is Cathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel. You're asking for my input regarding the re-b uilt chimney and I am okay with the re-built chimney as it is today without the previousl y approved stone detailing. Thank you for asking for my input. I wish you all well have a good weekend. Take care. Bye bye. (This voicemail was received 3/4/23 at 10:16 A M and transcribed by City Staff) Liz Olson AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 2 00 2 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 March 2023 FORUM TOPIC 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Page 19 of 51 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Visitors 44 Contributors 4 CONTRIBUTIONS 11 05 January 23 This is Kathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel Ave. This request is how I feel about the stone detail on the chimney being left out and I am okay with that. I think the stone detail woul d actually hurt the way it looks. That's my impression and opinion and I wish you all a H appy New Year and a wonderful day. Thank you so much. (This voicemail was receive d 1/4/23 at 9:45AM and transcribed by City Staff) Liz Olson AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 2 0 28 February 23 Hello this is Tracy Schaefer at 4627 Drexel Avenue responding to the letter I received t oday regarding the public hearing regarding the 4630 Drexel Avenue appeal of the Heri tage Preservation’s denial of the amendment regarding the rebuilt chimney without the previously approved stone detailing. Although the homeowner is a wonderful individual , Great Neighborhood homes is pushing the envelope again. They knew what needed t o be done when they submitted the plans and myself and other neighbors feel that the stone needs to be done. We’ve done remodeling and other neighbors in the neighborh ood have done remodeling and everyone else has to adhere to the preservation boards requirements. If it was not a requirement, it would not be a preservation district. So we would appreciate it if the appeal was denied again and the detailing needs to be put on the home. They’ve already, Great Neighborhood Homes has already been given too m uch leigh way and too many variances in other things. They know what is required whe n they entered these projects and they need to fulfill their end of the bargain and makin g sure that the home fits the neighborhood and without the stone it does not. The roof does not have the slate and there are many other things they have done where they ha ve gotten too much leigh way and someone needs to tell Great Neighborhood Homes t hey can’t continue to push the envelope in this neighborhood and in the City of Edina. Thank you. (This voicemail was received 2/28/23 at 10:22AM and transcribed by City S taff). Emily Bodeker AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 0 0 09 March 23 Hi this is Cathy Haymaker at 4633 Drexel. You're asking for my input regarding the re-b uilt chimney and I am okay with the re-built chimney as it is today without the previousl y approved stone detailing. Thank you for asking for my input. I wish you all well have a good weekend. Take care. Bye bye. (This voicemail was received 3/4/23 at 10:16 A M and transcribed by City Staff) Liz Olson AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES 2 00 2 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 28 March 2023 FORUM TOPIC 4630 Drexel Ave-Changes to the approved COA Page 19 of 51 15 March 23 Please deny the appeal. I have recently read that this style of house with stark white p BSD aint and black trim is often referred to as a "pandemic house." Black and white paints w ere easier to get during the supply chain issues of the pandemic. Some communities ar e even banning this style in new developments. This house on Drexel is now a conte AGREES DISAGREES REPLIES mporary house. I'm not sure what the roof is made of but it doesn't look historic or vinta ge. We replaced red clay tiles with antique tiles. Hated spending the extra money but 0 0 that was the promise we made when we bought the house. Many other residents hav e made similar sacrifices.I appreciate that it is hard to live in an older home. I also und erstand that sometimes architects and builders aren't honest with the owners and are d isrespectful of the historical aspects of the house even though they say they will be. I a lso fully appreciate that there is a need to make sure older homes are healthy for the re sidents and the surrounding neighbors. This seems like somebody just wants a conte mporary style home.The horse has been let out of the barn as they say. 1 The CITY ofEDINA 4630 Drexel Avenue Certificate of Appropriateness Appeal The CITY ofEDINA4630 Drexel Avenue www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY ofEDINACertificate of Appropriateness Approved September 8, 2020 www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY ofEDINAJune 14, 2022 COA Amendment www.EdinaMN.gov 4 •Existing Chimney was inspected by the Building Official 4-27-22 who deemed it a safety issue and ordered it to come down. •Part of the request of the June 2022 COA Amendment was approving the rebuilt chimney. Existing Chimney Approved Chimney Detail “Motion made by Commissioner Cundy, seconded by Commissioner Lonnquist to approve the reconstruction of the chimney as presented by the applicant, without the approval of the exterior gas insert. All voted aye. The motion carried.” The CITY ofEDINAJanuary 9, 2023 COA Amendment Request www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The applicant’s request was for the HPC to approve a COA amendment to the COA approving the changes to the rebuilt fireplace and approving the fireplace without the stone detailing, as it is built today. Approved Chimney Detail “Motion made by Commissioner Cundy, seconded by Commissioner Hassenstab, to deny the COA amendment as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried.” The CITY ofEDINAHPC Considered the following Standards of Rehabilitation •Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. •Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. •New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Heritage Preservation Commission Comments for 4-4-23 Appeal to City Council Edina Heritage Landmark – Country Club District 1982: National Register of Historic Places 2003: Edina Heritage Landmark Zoning Protects homes built 1924-1944 with sufficient historic integrity 2008: Updated Plan of Treatment “The primary objective of the Country Club Heritage Landmark District is preservation of the existing historic house facades and streetscapes.” 2019: Ten-Year Resurvey Report “over 80% of the houses retain integrity of those exterior features necessary to convey their historic architectural values.” “A relatively small number of historic homes have been substantially altered from their as-built appearance and no longer qualify for protection — the HPC should consider issuing a list of these properties for public information purposes.” 3 COA Amendment Requests - “As Built” Staff & Consultant Recommend Approval for All Sunnyside Home – unanimous approval Browndale Home - split approval Drexel Home – unanimous denial Context: Original COA - September, 2020 Corner lot consideration – more alterations to primary facades approved Street-facing garage added Distinctive green Spanish roof tile replaced Front door moved Removal of 49.9% of the exterior walls authorized (50% is limit) Context: COA Amendment, June 2022 Fireplace Rebuild Proposal “The chimney will be … finished with stucco and stone fireplace surround per the schematic to match the original structure.” – Applicant “Authentic exterior reproduction of the original home” – Real estate listings “When the chimney is complete the chimney will look very close to what it looked like in the past.” – Building Official [Submitted chimney plans] “will match the original in size, shape, material,and surface finish, restoring an important historical detail that would otherwise have been lost. Whenever replacement of a deteriorated building feature is necessary, the new construction should match the architectural characteristics of the feature being replaced.” – Preservation Consultant Closing Some arguments don’t apply – can answer questions as to why. -Screening by landscaping or fencing, -Exterior changes that don’t require a COA if done in isolation are not optional when included as part of a COA, -Mimicking other homes doesn’t preserve a home’s own historic integrity, -Aesthetic preferences have limited relevance on zoning rules Better Together links: meeting recording; public comment on 4 COA applications Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-27: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-27 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-27: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2023-27 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Police Edina Crime Prevention Fund $1875.00 Outreach/Promotional Items Edina Crime Prevention Fund $1353.75 Collapsible Dog Crate Dated: April 4, 2023 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2023. City Clerk Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-22: Conditional Use Permit for U.S. Internet at 6444 Xerxes Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-22 approving the Conditional Use Permit and Variance for U.S. Internet. INTRODUCTION: US Internet is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to construct a 1,900 square foot utility building at 6444 Xerxes Avenue. The Variance requested is to construct a building with no windows due to security concerns. The existing structure would be removed from the site and the new building constructed. See attached applicant narrative and plans. The facility would provide improved internet services to Edina residents. There would be one employee on site providing service for customers. Customers do not travel to the site for service. The applicant has revised their original plans to eliminate the variance required for building material. The public facing sides of the building (north and east) will be constructed of brick. See the attached revised building elevations. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and a recommendation for approval failed. Vote 4 ayes and 4 nays. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report - March 15, 2023 Engineering Review Memo Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Proposed Plans and Renderings Applicant Narrative Sustainability Questionnaire Staff Presentation to City Council Applicant Presentation to City Council, Mar. 21, 2023 Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Resolution No. 2023-22 (Approval of CUP and Variance) Revised Building Elevation - Brick Finish to Meet City Code March 15, 2023 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Conditional Use Permit – 6444 Xerxes Avenue (U.S. Internet) Information / Background: US Internet (USI) Corp. is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to construct a 1,900 square foot utility building at 6444 Xerxes Avenue. The Variance requested is to construct a building with no windows due to security concerns and built with cultured stone and EIFS instead of brick or stone entirely. The existing structure would be removed from the site and the new building constructed. (See the attached applicant narrative and plans.) The facility would provide improved internet services to Edina residents. USI currently serves the north/northeastern portions of Edina. The building on Xerxes would cover central and southern Edina. There would be one employee on the site providing service for customers. Customers do not travel to the site for service. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Double dwelling; zoned R-2, and guided high-density residential. Easterly: Commercial property in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Office building; zoned and guided Community Activity Center. Westerly: Office building; zoned and guided Community Activity Center. Existing Site Features The existing 15,111 square foot site contains an existing single-story structure, that was originally a duplex, but remodeled into an audiology clinic in 2006. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center Zoning: POD, Planned Office District Conditional Use Permit Per Section 36-1273, utility buildings and structures owned by private utility companies or governmental units other than the city and used for rendering service to all or any part of the city (but excluding warehouses, maintenance buildings and storage yards) shall be a conditional use in all districts and shall only be constructed pursuant to a conditional use permit granted in accordance with article V of this chapter (below). Per Section 36-305, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements. The project would not have an adverse impact on the above. Both police and fire would be able to access the site off Xerxes as they do today. The existing utilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. The proposed use is intended to significantly improve internet service in Edina. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property. The proposed use would generate far less traffic than the previous audiology clinic that was located on the site. There would be one employee on the site for maintenance and customer service to provide connections and disconnections. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety, or welfare. Staff does not believe the project would have an adverse impact on public health, safety, or welfare. The applicant has stated that there would not be noticeable noise outside of the building during normal operation. The building is designed to provide noise reduction for the limited noise emissions of the HVAC internal equipment. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. The proposed improvements would not impede development in the area. The applicant is providing an east-west pedestrian sidewalk along the north lot line that will help residents to the west gain access in to the commercial area to the east and to the south. (See attached site plan.) STAFF REPORT Page 3 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section. The proposed project meets all city code provisions. Utility buildings are a conditionally permitted use within all zoning districts. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned previously, utility buildings are a conditionally permitted use within all zoning districts. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping Landscaping is proposed along the north, east and south sides of the building to help screen the facility. Based on the perimeter of the site, 12 overstory trees are required for the site. The applicant is proposing 24 trees and a full complement of understory landscaping. (See attached landscape plan and renderings.) Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Lighting The parking lots would be required to meet all minimum standards for lighting as follows: “All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0.5 footcandle measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and one footcandle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises.” A lighting plan has been submitted and demonstrates the foot candle power generated from the lights, would meet city code requirement. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the STAFF REPORT Page 4 approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant is proposing an east-west pedestrian sidewalk along the north lot line. This will provide pedestrian access for residents to the west and north to gain access in to the commercial area to the east and to the south. Currently there is an existing sidewalk at the back of the curb on Xerxes; however, as is the City’s requirement to provide safer pedestrian movement by constructing boulevard style sidewalks along collector roadways, as a condition of approval, the city engineer is recommending the reconstruction of that sidewalk to be a boulevard sidewalk. (See attached engineering memo.) STAFF REPORT Page 5 Compliance Table City Standard Proposed Front – Xerxes Avenue Side Yard – North Side Yard – South Rear – West 35 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 35 feet 20 feet 20 feet 30+ feet Over-story Trees 12 trees required (number is based on the perimeter of the site) 24 trees existing and proposed on the site Building Material Section 36-579 of the zoning ordinance requires buildings in the POD District to meet the following standards: All new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). Ground level first floors must have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 20 feet. The applicant is requesting variances to these provisions. The intent of the above regulations was for quality and transparent buildings to show activity. However, with this proposal for a utility building to provide improved internet service, there will be minimal activity within this building, and customers to not travel to the site. For security purposes, no windows are proposed. The first 8 feet of the base of the building would be constructed of stone with EIFS above. Variance Per Chapter 36 of the City Code, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. STAFF REPORT Page 6 “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. These variances are reasonable given the use of the structure as a utility building and the need for security. The purpose of the 75% transparency requirement is to make commercial uses more inviting to the public. This is not a site that will generate traffic from the public. The first eight feet of the 20-foot building will be made of stone. Staff views this as a reasonable compromise given the utilitarian use of the building. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. The circumstances are unique for this type of use, a utility building. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed building meets all setback and height standards. The use is a conditionally permitted use within all zoning districts. It will be partially screened with landscaping and trees. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue Is the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) criteria met and the variance reasonable for the site? Yes, the CUP criteria is met, and the variances are reasonable for the following reasons: 1. As demonstrated on pages 2-3 of this report, the findings for a conditional use permit would be met. 2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards except for the building material. 3. The variances are reasonable given the use of the structure as a utility building and the need for security. The purpose of the 75% transparency requirement is to make commercial uses more inviting to the public. This is not a site that will generate traffic from the public. The first eight feet of the 20-foot building will be made of stone. 4. The plan includes landscaping and trees to exceed City Code, and partially screen the building. 5. A pedestrian sidewalk would be added along the north lot line for residents to the west and north access to the commercial area to the east and south. STAFF REPORT Page 7 6. The proposal would improve and expand internet serve to Edina residents. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit and Variances to construct the proposed utility building for U.S. Internet at 6444 Xerxes Avenue. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Chapter 36 Sec. 36-305 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements except for building material. 3. The variances are reasonable given the use of the structure as a utility building and the need for security. The purpose of the 75% transparency requirement is to make commercial uses more inviting to the public. This is not a site that will generate traffic from the public. The first eight feet of the 20-foot building will be made of stone. 4. The proposal would improve and expand internet serve to Edina residents. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Site plans date stamped January 19, 2023. Grading and drainage plan date stamped January 19, 2023. Landscaping plan date stamped January 19, 2023. Building renderings date stamped January 19, 2023. 2. A grading permit is required for the improvements. 3. A lighting plan must be submitted with the grading plan and must meet all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 5. Remove and replace the sidewalk along Xerxes Avenue with a 5-foot-wide sidewalk with a 5-foot-wide boulevard. 6. Submittal of the city’s sustainability design questionnaire. STAFF REPORT Page 8 Deadline for a city decision: May 2, 2023 DATE: 2/13/2023 TO: 6444 Xerxes Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering RE: 6444 Xerxes Ave S – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, and existing conditions survey drawings stamped January 19, 2023. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Maintenance of sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. General Comment Survey 3. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit 3.2 Provide a public access easement over the east-west sidewalk. Easement does not include maintenance of the sidewalk. Living Streets 4. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 5. Remove and replace sidewalk along Xerxes Avenue with a 5-ft wide sidewalk with a 5-ft wide boulevard. Provide public access and maintenance easement if necessary. Curb specifications per Hennepin County. Building Permit Traffic and Street 6. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 7. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 8. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 9. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 10. Specifications and details for sanitary pipe casing required at permit. Note, existing casing is 20” diameter. Grading/Building Permit, Prior to Starting Utility Work 11. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 11.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 11.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 12. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 13. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 14. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 15. Well not likely onsite. Watermain and structure installed/built in 1956. Storm Water Utility 16. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 17. Submit watershed district permit. Net decrease in impervious onsite. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 18. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 19. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 20. Replace the damaged fence section along the north property line. Building Permit Sustainability 21. Complete a Sustainable Design Questionnaire General Comment Other Agency Coordination 22. MDH, MPCA, MCES and Hennepin County permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 23. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit EdinaMN.gov 1 Site EdinaMN.gov 2 Site 4/05/12 3 Site EdinaMN.gov 4 Site mosom GRADE sustomoc NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS TYPICAL SEcnoN N 13111.51 IN WEARING MORSE, 1/1001 SPEC. r2360, SP1E424013 (a) show sPEc. 2353 EsTusixous TAck coAT -III_ 1.5' 1311.1111140U5 14011-8EA51/10, LINDOT SPEC 2.160, SPNW923013 (b) 8' MNDOT SPEC. 3136 CUSS 5 AGGREGATE 545E 1 (100% CRUSTED SAWN QUARRY OR ONE ROM) (o) SELECT Flt (AS REQUIRED) (e) NATURAL SOLO (d) (a) Compact each lift to o mWmurn 92 wadi t of the maximum speofk gravity in oaceelonee with laitIOT SPEC. 2350.3.0.1. (b) Compxt each lift to a meimurn 03 percent of A. Illindr1111rn specific grainy h accord:nee with 11/1130T SPEC. 236a 3.0.1. (a) Compact each lift to a mWmum 100 percent of the maximum dry density In accordance with 11111101 SPEC. 2211.35.2.a. (d) Prepert suboode in occerdenoe with /MOOT SPEC. 21135.3.F. Compost to a minimum 100 percent of the modreurn dry denary. Note that these are minimum pavement thicknesses, not overoge thicknessee. i c GOPHER STATE ONE CALL • WWW GOPHERSTATEOAECALL ORG (8C0) 252-1166 7011 FREE f65114540002 LOCAL The sublurtooe utak, infarinetko *own • on this Pb, Quer) Level D. This quer& level was detenrined occorting to the giAleinse of Cl/ASCE 313-02. sobbed 'Standard Guideline for the CoSectIon and 0spicton of (Sating Subsurfo. Utah' Ma.' SITE NOTES: 1. Existing boundary. location, topographic. and rutty information shown on this pion is from a field eurvey by Egon,Nowak, Inc. dated December 21, 2022. The Engineer is not responsible for Inaccuracies related to the eurvey InfomoUon. 2. NI rnoterials required for this work shall be new material conforming to the requirements for doss, kind, grade, etre, quality, and other details specified herein or as ehmn on the Pions. Do not use recycled or salvaged aggregate. asphalac partrnent. crushed concrete, or scrap shingles. Unless otherwise indicated, the Contractor shall furnish all required rnoteriots. in 3. NI materials required for UN work shall be new material conforming to the requirement. for doss, Mrd, grode, size, quarrty, and other detoib specified herein or as shown on the Plans. Do not use recycled eolviaged aggregate, aephaRic pavement. crushed comets, or scrap shingles. Unless otherwise dicated, the Contractor shall furnish oil required moterials. 4. NI dirnenekne ore to face of curb (*More opdicable), edge of pavement, or exterior fere of building, unless otherwise Indicated. 5. froggrtle for fitradlow Portland cement concrete for curb and gutter, sidewalk, and concrete pavement shall hove a 31 IAPB (4,500 psi) minimum 28-day compressive strength with an air content of 5.5% [111.5X] of the measured volume of the freshly mixed concrete and a .lump range of All concrete shall be in accordance with WIDOT Standoni Specification 2461, mil 3E52. Refer to the MOOT Specifications for complete mix remirernents. Use o water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to deicer.. Concrete aggregates shall be free of organic impieties, died, shale or other deleterious eubetancse. 8. Construct oil concrete eldewolks In accordance with 1.1000T Specification 2521. All concrete sidewalks eholl be oe Indicated on the plans, but not bee than 4' thick with 6 Inch x 6 Inch - /10/#10 wire she woven wire mesh reinforcing. 7. Concrete Racine and flolghbo: Thorough& wet the foundation and forms immediately prior to dadng the concrete. Use o bonding agent where fresh concrete is placed against hardened or portfol& hardened concrete, Place the concrete, consolldota to El all colds, strike off to the required grate, cnd float smooth. Take can not to bring excess water and floe pond to the auricles during floating. After the water sheen loos disappeared, edge the }dots and rightly broom finish the sadace to a uniform texture perpendkular to the One of batik. Do not dace concrete upon frozen subgrode or base. B. Concrete 5011151: Apply 75-1111-NOTE 26 IN Chlorinated Rubber Epoxy Concrete Treatment, or approved equal, to oil exterior portland cement cocrete pavement TK-TRI-KOIE 28 IN b a special formula of chlorinated rubber and epoxy manufocture n d by TK Products Construction Coatings (www.tkproductitcom). It Is formulated to cure, seal, and harden concrete. 9. Form coating material In order to prevent bonding between a Tom, dowel, or other object and concrete shall meet the requirement. of IANCOT Specification 3902. 10. Fr exterior concrete plebe, unlese otherwiee litchi:rated, provide expansion jointo at 30 foot Intervale and at locations where the concrete maroon. or adjoins ony exisang fixed objects sudo as fire hydrants. sidewalks, walb, posts, curbing, steps. driveways, building foundations, and other rigid structures. Divide extedor ebbs Into equore panel. of uniform she generally containing not more than 36 square feet of 11. Construct contnActIon }ants opproxlmotely 4 mm (1/8 inch) In width and cut to a depth of at least 1/3 the concrete thIckness, but not less than 51 mm (2 inches) from the exposed enlace. Construct kits P til the nuer to t:grade old align with similar joints in adjoinhg work when proctkabie. rice n= birds at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the work- Romd all joint edges with an edging tool having a radius of 5 awn (3/16 Inch) before finiahing. 12. Cure and protect og concrete within 1 hour otter the final finishing In accordance with LINDOT Speed-Kahan 2301.3.1J. Use the blanket curing method or one of the membrane curing methods. 13. Soot oil 3ointa, including expanelon kilts, with joint sealant. 14. Mow bituminous paving to cod for a minimum of 24 hours before opening to traffic. 15. theta concrete splash Wool°, at discharge of each downepout 16. White surface marking. (lettere and eyrnbole) shall be in conform.0 with the Standard Alphabet. far Highway Signs and Pavement Markings, FHA (4410-20). 17. Deeignote tog approved porking elate with white 4 Inch wide mole. markings. Paint dl cgrectknal troffic arrows oe shown In white. Appy two coats of paint. 18. Typicol all chew 90 parldrig rails ore x 18' unless otherwise Indicated. 19. Obtain and pay for all pemdts, tests, spections. etc. required by agencies that have jurisdiction over the project Including the NPD ES perrrktfrom the State The ContnActor reeponeible for all bond., letters of credit, or earth euretba related to the wort Execute and inspect work In decadence with all local and state cod., Nes, ordinances, or regulations pertaining to the particular type of work involved. NEW S.-WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK. ALL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED EXCEED 2% CROSS SLOPE OR 5% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) ',PROPERTY UNE ...,...______________> EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT' INSTALL CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCKS AT DISCHARGE OF EACH DOWNSPOUT MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT GRADE SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AT UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) 10 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET 9.00' - .-- 13.25' [TRANSFORMER PAD 16.011' €3.50' NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 63.50' PROPOSED BUILDING (1w.) WI-IfTE STRIPE PROPOSED GENERATOR 5.00' COORDINATE THE WORK WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RI 4.00' EXISTING PYLON SIGN TO REMAIN I 22-556 JO MMHG: \\ server \ Project. \2022 V22-558 US Internet - 6444 Xerxes Avenue South - Edina, WI \ 2023-01-1/3 \ eiteplan.dwg LAYOUT: CI - Shleplon MEE: banding; %REF: covey / \ ( 14W CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55423 DATE LEVIOION I HEREBY CERTIFY' THAT THIS FLAIL SPECIFICATION. OR REFORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR LNDER MY DRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED FiTOFESS101/AL ENGIIIEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE 0 MINNESOTA WU) LUVIZO- bran Miridsto5i DATE 01118/2023 110 23468 IIIPCFP.,T1€11 PROJECT 110 32-5€€ DRAM 0A In CHECKED BY ss APPROVED BY Vol SCALE DATE virler202.3 E ES CR IF T SITE PLAN 1-fEET II C1 PLACE BIO—LOGS DOWN GRADIENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AREA TOTAL LOT AREA = 15,113 SQ. FT. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 9,222 SQ. FT. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 8,370 SQ. FT. NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA = 852 SQ. FT. City of Edina Storm Water Reauirements: Since the proposed activity does not add over 400 square feet of new impervious surface with o drainage path directed to private property or over 600 square feet of new impervious surface in areas that drain to structural flooding issue, implementation of on—site storm water management measures is not required. \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWWGORIERSTATEONECALL ORG 16001252-1166 TOLL FREE It 16511454-0002 LOCAL • TN stibeurface cR1105 Infer-maim eh D owri on this pion is utifity Odder/ Lord Tide quality level woe determined =cording to the gukleirwe of Cl/ASCE 2, antital 'Standard Guidirthe for Ue CoNeution and Depiction of Ewrithe NEW 5.—WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK. ALL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED EXCEED 2% CROSS SLOPE OR 5% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR BUILDING WATERPROOFING AND FOUNDATION DRAINAGE SILTFENCE PROPERTY UNE .6ol-F1.4 -,,c.> 1 aviamrsomilAtir4 - vii414. ' BB,. 883 eL.5.5ok 885 , 4 ...... i l 1 1 1 , i i .i l i ll / li 1 / is3.101 6 4.00 gE3 S / ........... . • . . .... °° °°° °°° °.°.°°°. cooRDINATE MRK wiai THE ADJ,,,NACENT pROPERIY (I—ER _00 0 00 00 0 0000 00000000 0 0 0 Oo LAtss'' 25 091 • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .60 0 0 0 0 0‘°..t' O 0 0 0 0 . 000 ° O 0600.06 ° e0d 0A u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O . 00000 ob 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0009' 00; 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 ° ° oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /0 0 0 —FLOW> 13.25 —FLOW> BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION = 885.5 --> SILTFENCE 82.501 —FLOW> —41.4 -1.63.3o1 9.00' [scoot 63.60' <- <A1014— GENERATOR FLOOR ELEVATION = 884.0 </t014— -165501 lea SILTFENCE 885 0 4- CITY CH JAN 1 9 2023 ON—SITE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EDINA SITE DRAINAGE PRECAUTIONS: 1. Reduce soil compaction by limiting equipment access to specific construction paths, if applicable. 2. Loosen compacted soils through raking, tinning, tilling, or other methods to a minimum depth of ¢ inches. 3. Place new, organic rich, topsoil to a minimum depth of 4 inches on areas of disturbance. 4. Place sod or seed and mulch on exposed soils as soon as practical. 5. Create no new flow paths concentrating drainage area directed to or near private structures. 20 10 0 10 FEET IN SCALE 22-558 T. • R. Ju DRAYANth \ \terror\ Projecie \ 2022 \ 122-558 US Intemet — 6444 Xerxes Avenue South — Edina, MN \ 2023-01-18 \22568C10.dwg LAYOUT: C2 — Grading Drainage and Erodon Control Plan MEEl building; XREF: minify; XREF: eiteplan CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55423 CATE REVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECFKATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATED MINNESOTA WiIt) &an Muldslodt DATE 01/18/2023 NO 22468 23468 INFORMATION FROLECT NO 22-5E6 DRAM N BY Iv CHECNED EY APPROVED BY thin SCALE 500. DATE 01/16/2023 CESCRIPTION GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL ,HEET C2 SANITARY SEWER: I. Unless otherwise indicated, use reinforced, prewst, concrete maintenance holes confomIng to ASN 0478, fumrshed with precort bases. Sanitary sewer maintenance hothe shall be supplied with pre-formed Inverts ond flexible neoprene Weeve connections for o1 Moroi M. 375 mm (15 Inches) In diameter or less, unless otherwise indicated. Joints for oil precast maintenance hole sections dam have confined, rubber 'Ci'-ring gaskets In accordance with ASN C443. These joints ont cooly .ed in sewers to hold intiltraUon ond exflthation to a practical minimum and are adequate for hydroetatre Made up to 30'. The inside barrel diameter shad not be le. than 48 inch.. All joints and connecUone in the sewer system shall be gastight or watertight. Inlet and west connections to tower manhole. must use flexible compression joints located between 12 and 36 inches from the manhole in accordance with Minnesota Rules port 4714.719.6. Whem permitted by the adminietrag. authority a. an alternate inetallation method, approved milient rubber joints or waterdop gaskets may be used In order to moles waterUght connecUorts to manholes and other structurea (see Minnesota Rules port 4714.301.2). Use rococo 'Concrete Manhole Adaptors' or 'forge Monet. Wata.tope, Preee-Seal Vateretop Grouting Rings', or approved equal. Cement mortar joints ore permitted imly for repairs or connections to existing lines having such joints. The building trevier Mart. 2 feet otheide of the building. See Minnesota Rut. part 4714.715.1. Material Pistolled within 2 feet of the building must be of materials approved for use inside of or within the building. The exterior sonitory ester piping moat comp6 with the following requirements° (A) Double ayes may not be used for drainage fittings In the horizontal position (see MInnesoto Rules, Chapter 4714, Meth. 310.5) bwouse proper pipe dope connot be maintained on both of the lateral brands.. (3) Changes in direction in drainage piping must be made by appropriate Lie* of wpm and bends (see Minnesota Ruin, Chapter 4714, Section 706.0). When connecting any vertical drop to a horizontal run, use o aye and a 1/8 bend (45 deg), or o sanitary combo. A sanitary combo la a combination aye and a 1/8 bend combined in a single fitting. The mown la to form a long rack. bend In order to insure that the waste is directed in the dowel/earn direction as it enter. the horizontal run. Tees are not allowed where the direct'. of flow thong. from either verUcal to horlzontol or horizontal to horizontal. 5. Elm: Use solid-core, Schedule 40 PobMnyl Chloride (PVC) Plostle Pipe for all designated PVC sanitary .wer "Mess wields of the building. The PVC pipe shot meet or sawed the industry standards and requirements as met forth by the American Society for Tering and Matertale (A5TI4) 01785 and D2665. Fittings must campy with ASN 01866, 132665, Of F794. Joints must be approved mechanical or push-on utilizing on elaetornerth seal, Use of solved cement Mlle le allowed for building services. Sohent cement joints In PVC pipe must use ASI11 F658 pumas primer and A.7111 D2504 cement In occordance with Minnesota Ruin part 4714.605.2.2. The Installation must comply with ASTM 02321, which requires open-trench InstallaUon on a ...Una°ue granular bed. B. Osongsda: Install cleanouts on all son/tory sewer *enlace In ocoordonce with Minnesota Rules part 4714.719. Install cleanouts for pipes 4-inch and over in size at Intervals not to 4%0344 IOU feet in an:light runs and for each aggregate horizontal longe in direction exceeding 135 degrees. Cleonouts shall be of the some nominal dze as the pipes they serve. Include frost sleeves ond concrete frame and pipe support. Instal a meter box frame and wild lid (Neenah R-1014-A, or approved wool) over all deonouts. 7. 1.16,9: Presetre test all sanitary sewer in accordance nob the Minnesota Rules Sectione 4714.712 and 4714.723. Concrete manholes and weer lines shall be tested by negative prem.re in occordance with A5111 C1214-19, A5111 C1244-17, or the Hydrostatic Test Method in 00000r 1107.2.3(0). Test all flexible =Mary est. finesfor deflection after Use sewer line has been metalled and bockfill Mas been In plow for at Mart 30 days. No pipe shall exceed a deflection of 5X. If the test fails, took* nweseary repairs and retest. 8. Metall flexible watertight frame/chimney seals on all sanitary se.r rnalritenonce holes In order to seal the outside of the chimney from the cast Iron frame down to the owe. The seal shall be a continuous eeamlette bond mode of high qudity MEM (Ethylene Propylene Diane Monomer) rubber with a mintrnum thickness of 65 mils Use Internal/External Adapter Seal at. manufactured by Adaptor, Inc. (wmadaptorrnocorn/wp-content/udoods/2019/04/ADAPJEMantroleSeal.pd0, Intl-Shield UN-band one piece molded sewing system os manufactured bySeoling Systeme, Inc. (w.vdreisealingeyeterne.com), or approved equal. 9. Use Neenah Foundry Co. R-1842 casting Mt, self-aealing, word, type B Ile, or approved egad, on oil sanitary sever maintenance holes. Covers Mud bear the 'Sanitary Sewer. label. 10. Unless otherwise indicated, use 4 ft. dhoneter (1.4.) pm-cast reinfdred concrete strict.es on all eoretaty mow manholes. 11. Iraloll a meter box and cover (Neenah R-1014-4. or approved equal) over all PVC cleanotrth. 12. Tree* Wire: instoll locating sires on all conductive and non-conductive Mown sewer, sanitary sewer, and water line.in ocoonfonce with the Minnesota Rural Water Association (1.1FWA) Trace Wire Specification MI. and Details bronsanrwa.ccan/PDF/TrocertaireSpecCuldeFirohrebriepd0. Use 012 HDPE-insulated Capper-dad elect wire roted for underground strike. lbe calor of the insulating jacket shall be as follows: groundwred, storm sewerwgreen, wnitory sewer=green, and water lines=bke. Install the wire on the bottom side of the pipe below Use spring line. Fasten the who to the pipe with tape or plawik lies at 5' intervals. Do not wrap Use trace wire around the corresponding utility. On not connect 0. trot. wire to iodating conductive utirdies. Use Copperhead Dryconn 3-Way or Locking Snake Site connectors rated for underground direct bury applications or approved equal al oil creeeinge or service connectlons. TOM on connectors are not allowed. Time wire must be property grounded at all dead ends and titmicea. Install grade-level/In-grand bots win access boxes and drhe-In magnesium grounding anodes at at dead en., "Mc., and fire hydrants. Trow wire OGG.11 boxee shall be color coded no follows: +Awn sewervigreen, sanitary sewer-grew, and water lines-blue. 13. fthiestabM Wornina Tow: Install detectable underground naming tape Woolly above all underground utnilles at a depth of 457 mm (16 Inches) below finished grade, unless othenalse indicated. Underground warning tape shall be 3-inches Wile with a minimum 5.0 it overall thickness. TVe shall be manufactured using a 0.8 ml clear virgin polypropylene tam, reverse printed and laminated to a 0.35 1. mil WO aluminum foil core, and then rominated to a 3.75 mil clear virgin potyethylene film. The aluminum baling makes underground assets easy to find using a non-ferrow locator. Tape shall be printed using o diagonaliy striped deargn for moodmum vleibility and meet the AMA Color-Cade standard tai (V) for rldng ga d otil of boded util oppro.d equaities Use Pro-Ube Safety Products (www.proRneealetysom) detectable ma or l. (1) 14, The minimum depth of cover for sanitaty sewer without insulation is 6 feet 'mutate sanitary sews services at locations where the depth of cover la less than 6 feel Provide a minimum Insult:Um thickness of 4 inches. the insulation must be at Nast 4 feet wide and centered on the pipe. Petah the ineulation boards 6 inch. above the tope of the pipes on mechanically compacted and 'meted pipe sir bedding material. Use high density, dosed cell, rigid board material equivalent to DOW Styrofoam A1 Highload 40 Polyetyrens insulation. Individual insulagan board dtmensione to/Polly meaeur. ir wide by 8' O long by 2. thio 15. Install all pipe with the ASN Identification numbers on the lop for Inspection. Commence OP. laying at .Cr) the lowest point In the proposed eerier One. Field verify that the. re positive droinage at the oat. location. Lay the pipe with the bell end or receiving groove end of the pipe poinWg upgrade. When connecting to on exiding pips, uncover the iodating pips In order to allow any adjustrnerrte In the proposal line and grole before laying any pipe. Do not lay pip.. In sot.r or when the trench ‘1.1 condtIona are unsuitable for such work 16. All saddle tee or err fittings must provide an integrally molded pipe stop in the branch for positive pfotection °gainnl advice pipe Insertion beyond the inside of the sewer main pipe wok 17. TWIN. all existing lines prior to conation. 18. Steel casing pipe shall be proud at the same Mope as the carrier pipe in order to ensure that the comtar pipe le placed along Use speckled grade. If the proper elope cannot be mointoined, then the casing spacere moot be odjusted so that the sorrier pipe is placed at the specified grade. 19. Within the eating pipe, the carrier pipe joint. Wall be mechanically reetralned in order to allow for the future removal of the carrier pipe without Joint separation. 20. Steal wising pipe .hall ha. o minimum yield strength of 35-kel. 21. Use MCI cooing spawn manufactured by Rad Spacers North America, Inc. or approved equal. Inciall epaten 13'-e- 0.C. maximum and at cods pipe bell. Double the spacers at each end of the owing CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" CARRIER PIPE JAN 1 9 2023 10 10 211 SCALE IN FEET -183.301 iv-- 13.25' 9.00' 9.00' mosilawies CONNECT TO EXISTING 10 CARRIER PIPE 63.50' 4. 30.00' NEW 12- DIP SANITARY SEWER 24-0 BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION = 885.5 63.50' PLUG END OF CASING WITH GROUT (6' MINIMUM THICKNESS) ............. • ....... ... •• ...... 2, Iwo Ott GENERATOR FLOOR ELEVATION = 884.0 I I I I I I I 195 501 90 .15 ref ._. . e c 0 O OO O O O 10 0 .. • es. . • 1 0 ......OOo • ... 0 • •11 ..... c0 EMEND EXISTING 24-INCH DIAMETER WELDED STEEL CASING PIPE 30-FEET WEST 20.50' PROPERTY UNE ......... \182.50( 500' REPLACE PORTION OF EXISTING 10 DIP CARRIER PIPE WITH NEW 12- re 1 TRANSFORMER PAD GOPHER Il GOPHER STATE ONE CALL • the wbeurface dirty Infortnetion ghoul on this plan is ,limyfluattly Lale D. Theauality Wel was determined accenting to the aildeinee of C144SCE 38-02. entitled 'Stan.. Guideline for the CoPectroe and Dwiction of &taring Subeurface LAM,. Data.' • WWW GOPHERSTATEONECALL ORG 18001 252.1166 TOLL FREE 1651) 4540)02 LOCAL 18.00' 2. CONNECT TO EXISTING 24" 3. CASING PIPE 4. EXISTING EIRE HYDRANT! ..•••16••• .1111M1 t. ( laW CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55423 DATE REVISION I HEREBS CERTIFY THAT THIS PI/41, SPECF CATION. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEM UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AIIID THAT 1PM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAW) OF THE STATE 0 MINNESOTA Mtn Mundstak DATE 0111642023 110 23466 INFCRMATION FRO,ECT NO 224E6 ORM/it/BY Ira CHECRED BY SS AFPRCiVED BY thrn ECALE grefhc DATE 0 MI 812023 CESCRIPTION UTILITY PLAN 'ThEE:1 is C3 22-558 T. R. , S. JAI DRAWING: \ eerver ithojecte \ 2022 \ /22- 556 VS Internet - 6444 Vera. Avenue South - Edina, LIN12023-01-18122558C10.dwg LAYOUT: C3 - Utility Pion XREF: XREF: wryest XREF: eiteplan GENERAL: 1. Existing boundary, location, topographic, and Wily Information skim on this pkm b fezees a field mrvey by Egan, Field, & Nowak, Ina. dated December 21, 2022. the Engineer is not responsible for inaccuracies related to the money information. 2. Perform all construffion work in accordance with State and Local requirements. 3. Perform all construcUon activity In accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency GENERAL STORMY/Alt/1 PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTNNY meed Rivet I, 2018 and all subsequent amendments thereto. 4. Comply with on appkable boot, state, and f °dere' safety regulations. Comply with the work safety practices meal. by the Occupational Solely and HeathArlmlnietratien (OSHA). OSHA prohbits entry into 'confined spaces,' such as manholes and inlets (see 29 CFR Section 1010.146), without undertaking certain specific practices and procedures. Perform somations in accordance with the requirements of 0.S.HA 29 CFR, Part 1926. Subpart P, Excovotione Trenching dander. require protect'. system. on trench. deeper than 5 feet. Bench or slope dolmans in order to provide safe worldng condition, and stability for the placement of engineered fill. Do not expose workers to the danger, of being elmck by materiel and equipment. Keep see end other materials at least 2 feet from the edge of cry benches. Trenches meret be inspected by a competent Indridual, be free of Handing wok. and olinosphefic hazard., and have a eafe meone of entering and exiting bac. allowing a worker to enter. The Contractor is responeible for nornIng the 'Competent Indffiduar In accordance with CFR 1926.6. Sloping or benthing for excavations greater than 20 feet deep mud be approved by a registered professional engineer (www.ashegov). 5. Safety ie solely the responsibility of the Contractor, dm is also eddy responsble for the condruction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, and for mlety precautions and programs In connection with the Work. 6. The Engineer thee not ham control over, charge of, or responsibilly for the combection mean. methods, techniques, eequencee or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs In connection with the Work. the Engtheeee review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or of any conetructon means, methods, technique. eequenme, or procedures. 7. Examine ell local mnditbrms at the site, and assume responsibility as to the erodes, contours, and the character of the earth, existing conditions, and other Rona that may be encountered during excavation work above or below the miffing grade. Review the drawings, specifications, and geotechnical report comring this week and become familiar with the anticipated site candrtione. 8. Refer to the architectural pions for building and sloop dirn.sIone, site layout and dtlneneions, pavement motion. and details, striping, and other elle features. 9. A limn.ed surveyor shall perform conertruction staiing. The Contractor chat provide and be responsible for the elating. Verify all pion and detail dimenelons prior to conekuction dating. Stake the limits of walkways and curbing prior to volvebox, ...nonce hob, and catchbasin Adjust vokebox and mointenance hole beaten. In order to avoid confkts with curb and gutter. Adj.t cote:Mode locations In order to align properly with curb and gutter. 10. Provide temporary fences. barricades, coverings, and other proteffions km order to preserve miffing Items to remain, and to prevent Injury or damage to Pelson or popery. 11. Provide all traffic control required In order to canstruct the proposed improvements. Traffic control design and associated government approvals ore the responeibility of the Contractor. Comply wItin tool authorities and the latest version of the littlesseto Lemont an Uniform Truffle Centred De.. (18.1LITC0), including the ftgjd Manual for Temoanary Traffic Control bone lowed& If the temporary traffic control zone effects the movement of pedestrians. provide aiequote temporary pedestrian access and walkways. If the temporary traffic control ea. affects on acmes'. and detectable pedeetrian facility, maintain accessibility and detectability along the alternate pedestrian route In accordance with the provision. for pedeetrion and worker safety contained in Port 6 of the MMUTGD. 12. Connect to miring sanitary 1/seer Mir. by innoredrilling. Connect to cabling dorm e.er 11Hie by either smoitting or ooredribng. U. over or dolls that provide water to the blade. Meet al City standard. and epeoffications for the the connection. Reconatroct Inverts after 'Mediation. Use sate stop gaskets In order la proKde watertight seal. when penetrating a structure was with a pipe. Take measurements before beginning construction to ensure that smoke connections do not cut into maintenance areaes dada. joints or pipe bond Jaime. 13. Complete remove existing concrete and masonry structures that are located within the proposed building and future building expandon oreas. MI other siebng sewer and watertnain pipes that ere to be abandoned shall either be removed, or completely filled wOh eand or met... low strength material (CLSM) also known as Bambino concrete fill. Bulkhead ends of the pipe segment to be dawn...toned with concrete. NI other miffing sanitary ester and storm sewer ha that are to be abandoned In place shall be abandoned as follows: (1) remove matinee, rings, and top section., (2) bultheod any plpe opening., (3) break two 4-inch diameter holee In the barrel at the bottom of the etructures for dominoes and cover the hobs 04th goateed]le filter fabric, and (4) fill the dentures with eond or CLS1.1. 14. Tertiary and Ins.cliong All plumbing inatellffion. Including water and sorer aervices, murk be teeted and Inspected In accordance with ea requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code (Minnesota Rules Chapter 4714). Coordinate testing and inspecton with the State Health Department and the City Public Works Department. No drainage a plumbing work may be covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections. 15. SuseffignaLlYelefereLessffi Construct semr and water service. In accordance with Minnesota Rube part 4714.720 and 4714.721. Provide a minimum horkeetal separation of 10 feet between all water and sewer roes. Ineluding marysies, catch bodes, storm , watery sewer, drainthe or other potential mama far contamination In accordance sith Minnesota Rule. port 4714.609.6. he the separation distance from the outer edge of the pipe to the abler edge of the contomination source (airier edge of structures, piping, etc.) At water and sneer crossings, the bottom of the water pipe located Rein ten feet of the point of erasing must be at least 12-inches above the top of the sewer. Whin this Is not feasible, the sewer pipe materiel must be approved for use Inside of or within a building in occordonce with the requirements of Illenesolo Rule, part 4714.701. Only AST)/ D1785, D2665, F891, or F1488 Schedule 40 PVC moy cross above or Ism than 12 inches below potable water tine, thee Minnesota Rubs part 4714.720.1). No joints or connections ore allowed on the water line within 10-feet of the cresting. 16. Coordinate building effiRy connection 'mations at 2 H. out from the proposed building with the Interior Plumbing Contractor prior to construction. Verify water and sewer servim locations, sizes, and elevations with the Mechanical Engineer poor to construction. Coordinate construction and onnections with the Mechonkol Cakes!. 17. The subst°. utility Information shown a this plan is utility 0.1ity Laval O. fhb quality level was determined according to the guide.. of Cl/ASCE 38-04 effilled 'Standard Guideline for the Collection and OmictIon of ExisUng Subsurface Oblky Data' by the FHA 1B. The Waltham of existing WfrUw shown an this plan ore from .card Information. The Engineer doew not guarantee that all existing uhlilles ore shown or, If shown, exist In the 'mations Indicated on the plan. K b the Contractor's resparsibility to mmrtain the final vatleol and horizontal 'oweon of all siding unities (Including water and sewer lines and appurtenance.). Notify the Engin.r of any descrepancles. 19. The Contractor Is moldy remoulds for al utility locate. Contact utility mammies for 'mat . of all public and private °Mee within the work area prior to beginning condructIon. Collect GOPHER STAlE ONE at (651) 454-0002 In the klinnmpore/SL Paul metro area, or 1-800-252-1166 eisewhere In ffinnesota for coed location of edeting Watt. ailast 48 woridng hours (not including weekends and holidays) before beginning ony conetmetbn In accordance with Minnesota Statute 2110. Obtain ticket number and meet with representoUvee of the earthus utlIttles at the site. Provide the Owner with the ticket number Information. Gopher State One Coll Is a fres service that locates municipal and utility company lines, but does not locate private unity lime. Use an Independent locator service or other means In Order to Obtain locations of prhate utility lime including, but not limited lo, undergrmnd <lettdc cakes, telephone, 1V, and lam spriffider lines. 20. Pothole to verily the positions of existing underground loonies at a sufficient number of lecatione in order to assure that no mnilict with the proposed work exists and that suffident clffirance is available. 21. Where ablating gas, electric, mi., or telephone utilities conflict with the Work, coordinate the abandenment relmation, offset, or support of the existing WINn den the appropriate local utility companie. Coordinate new gas meta and gas line Installation, electric meter and electric eenice Installation, cable service, and telephone aerobe indentation with the local ably compere... 22. When working near existing telepisne or electric odes, brace the poles for support. When working around .thtling underground utilities that become exposed. provide eel/Idea lappet coder to prevent exmasho dress on the siding piping. lhe location and preservation of existing underground utibles le eddy the reeponsibility of the Controctor. 23. Temporary support ...tome are the reeponalblay of the Contractor, who is also solely nesponsible for the contraction mea methods, technique. sequences or promduree, and for safety precautions and programe In conn.ton with the temporary support system, Temporary orary support madam indude, but are not ernited to, shoring. sheeting, bromine, anchorages, examation support coll., directional boring, auger jacking, .1 stobilizatthn, and other methods of protecting existing improvements. 24. Arrange the and secure suitable disposal ore. off-site. Dispose of all excess sal, waste materiel, debris, and all e.t.a, not designated for sokage. Waste material and debris includes tree,, dorms, pipe, mmerete, aephaltic concrete, cans, or other wade material from the meet/action operation, Obtain the rights to any wade or. for dimmed of unsuitable or surplue Material either shovel or not shown on the pions. Alll work in (reposing of well material shall be considered incidental to the work. disposal mist conform to applicable solid cask disposal permit regulations. Obtain all necessary permits at no met to the Owner. 25. Store and protect existing site features that need to be removed and replaced in connection with the Work Replace damaged or stolen site features at no addrUonol coat to the Owner. 26. Straight Ern saw-art existing bituminous or concrete surfacing at the perimeter of pavement removal arrow. Use KINVO that provide water to the blade. Do not allow the Blurry produced by Ude proms to be tracked outside of the immediate work area a discharged into the sewer mistem. Tock and met, all tonne...ins to existing bituminous pavement. 27. Reboote overhead poser, telephc., and cable line. as required. Seal and minor any ea:tiling unused .-site wells and septic systems in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health (MOH) requirement,. Provide the NON with a Well and Boring Sealing Record, or certify In writing that there are no unused wets on the properly. 2g. NI meter'sle required for this sork aeon be now material conforming to the requirements for dam, kind, grade, dm, quality, and other details sp.ified herein or as shown on the Plans. Do not use recycled or salvage] aggregate, asphaltic pavement, crushed concrete, or scrap shingles. Unless othesrise indicated, the Control., shall June. oil required materials and labor In order to perform the conetruction In omenionm with the conetructbn d.umente, specificetkne, and regulatory agent.. 29.1teconetruct drivermnys and patch street to match existing pavement section and erode. Sod right-of-way. Restore the public right-of-my at temporary conetniction entrance loeffiene. Replace any concrete curb and gutter, Mundelein pavement, sidewalk or meat. cover damaged by the construction activity. Restoredamaged turf with sod will. the public right-of-way. Rs work area shown is general and may need to be adjusted in the field. 30. Gut teodproIl order to II. re ebels'171=mann'ew",,r:m.whre:.?:,:°:.°.71.1*Vtig sod to ti.niedib%","Zelh.1207:. dunned. 31. Document adding corditk. (photographs, video, field survey, etc.) In order to enable restoraten to match existing conditions and In order to ensure that reelered arms hove podtive drainage similar to existing condition. 32. ProKde positive droinoge every Corn building. at all times. Provide and maintain temporary drainage throughout coed/Ireton until the permanent drainage eye., and @tinctures are in place and operational. Install temperer/ ditches, piping, pumps. or other comm as neceeeary In order to insureproper dralnoge at of times. Provide low points of building pede or roadways with positive cutter,. Do not block drainage from or direct excess drothoge to ailment property. 33. Protect all structural and landscaping not lobed. for demolition from damage during corstest.n. Provide protective coverings and .dmuris as nece.ary to prevent damage to existing work that b to remain. Existing work to remain may include items such as trees, shrubs, lawns, sidewalks, drives, curls, utilities, buildings ond/or other structures on or adjacent to the site. Provide temporary fences and barricades os required for the cafe and proper execution of the work and the protection of pavan and property. Protide building *worry. and mien. monitoring In locations where demolition, excavation, underpinning, pile driving, compacting, or similar work is to be performed adjacent to or in the vicinity of siding Retire on, on mite or off -erte areas disturb. directly or IndirecUy due to °obstruction to o condition equal to or better than the existing condition. 34. Protect mks grades from damage by surface water runoff. 35. Full dadn strength is not avolieble in bituminous pavement areas unto the final lift of asphalt is compacted Into Oise. Prolmt pavement are. from .erloading by delivery trucs, construction equipment, and other vehicles. 36. When vowing or drilling concrete or mammy. use DO. that provide water to the blade. Do not allow the Blurry produced by this prom. to be tracked outdde of the immediate work area or discharged into the sewer system. 37. Adjud all public and private whackers, including curb elope, volve boxes, maintenance hole cowlings, mtchbosin wstlnge, deonoul cown, and eimilar Items to finished erode. Comply with the requirement. of each structure's owner. Structures being reset In paved areas mud meet the owner's requirements for traffic loading. 38. Grading for all sidewalks a. accessible rout., Including driveway crcesings, shall mete. to current Slats and Federal Americans with Disobilities Act (ADA) requirements. In occordance with IDA Sedge. 403.3. dopes droll not exceed exceed 29 cress slope or 5X In the direction of travel. Sidewalk omen to external building doore shall be AIM compliant Acmedble porting della shall not exceed 28 elope In any direction. 39. Curb move on accessible routes shall comply with sections 405 and 406 of the Americans with Disabilities Set Acc.sibility Guidelines (AZIAAG). 40. baldl all pipe with the ASTI/ idenUficollon numbers on the top for inspmten. Commence pipe laying at the lowest point In the proposed sewer line. Reid verity that there Is peseta, drainage at the Whorl location. Lay the pipe with the bell end or receMng gr.m end of the pipe pointing upgrade. When connecUng to on siding pipe. ucover the sniffing pipe In order to oflow any adjustment. In the proposed line and grade before laying any pipe. Do not loy pipes In water or when then trench condition. ore unsuitable for each work 41. Obtain and pay for all permit., tests, Inspections, etc. required by attendee that have briedthion over the project including the NPITES permit from the Stole. The Controctor le reefs... for all bond. letters of credit or ash lamellae related to the work. Famed. and impact work in accordance with Go local ond state cod., rules, ordinances, or regulations pertaining to the particular type of work invoked. 42. Measure pipe length, from center-of-structure to center-of-sffixture, or to the end of omens. 43. Obtain permits from the City for work In the pub. right-of-my. 44. Construct sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer utilities In accordance with the City Engineer's Assadotion of Minnesota Standard Spedficallons aectione 2800, 2811. and 2621 dated 2018, or the Went raked edition. 45. These plans, prepared by Suede Engineering, PUS., do not extend to or include eysterne pertaining to the safety of the mnstmetion contractor or It. employees, agents, or representatives In the performance of the work. The sml of Sande Engineering's registered profesionol engineer here. does not exiled to any such safely systems that may nor or homelier be incorporated Into there plane. The conetruction contractor shall prepare or obtain the appropriate solely systems which may be required by U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and/or tocol regulations. 46. Existing Wilkes shown on Ale plan are located oe accurately ore poseible. Hovreme the Engineer does not Tremontee that all utnlities are them, or N shown ore in the exact locations indicated on the pion. It is the Contractor's r.ponsiblilty to ascertain the final vertical and horizontal location of oil existing utilltles (including munkipol water and sewer lines ond appurtenances) and to notify the comae of the utilities a minimum of 46 working hours before darling conetruction In a glen area, requesting location In the field, as exact ae poseible, 01 all Wlitie, which my be offmted by the construction. 47. Ifigeillies 'neon locating wiree on a1 conductive and non-conductive dorm ewer, watery sewer, ond water lin. in accordance with the Wesson/ Rural Water Association (MBNA) Trace Wire Specification Guide and Details (wesernova.com/PDF/TroceeffireSpecGuldeflmthebg.per). Use /12 HOPE-Insulated copper-clad steel wire rated for underground servim. The color of the inmiffing jacket shall be os follom: groundwred, lam mmomegreen, sanitary s.er=green, and water ...blue. Install the wire on the bottom side of the pipe below the spring line. Fasten the wire to the pipe with tape or plas. Les at 5' Intervals. Do not wrap the trace wire around the corresponding Lathy. Do not connect the trace wire to existing corduelive 0601,,. Use CopperheadNyco. 3-Way or Lacking Snake Bite connector, rated for underground direct bury appticatbns or approved equol at oN creasing, or service conemtbes. Tele on connectors are not allowed. Trace dm mud be properly grounded at at dead ends and services. Install grade-level/in-ground trace wire °mess bowee and drive-In magnesium grounding Grades at all d.d ends, services, and Me hydrants. Trace wire acme, boxes droll be color coded es follows storm sewerewgretn, sanitary ....green, end water finemblue. 4e. %USW& Won.° Tea; install detectable underground warning tope directly above ail underground utilities at a depth of 457 mm (18 inches) below finbhed grade, unless otherethe incecated. Underground warning tope shell be 3-Inch,, wide with a minimum 5.0 mil .oral thickness. Tope Mall be manufactured wing a 0.8 mil clear virgin polypropylene film, reverse printed and laminated to a 0.35 mil solid aluminum loll care, and then laminated to a 3.75 mil clear dregIn polyethylene film. The aluminum bonding makes underground assets easy to find using n-fem. locator. Tape shell be printed using o dlogonolly striped design for maximum risibility and meet the APWA Color-Code standard for Identification of burled utilities Use Pro-Une Safety Products (wreproeneeinfety.corn) detectable marldng tope or approved equal. 49.U/trete Powcrinkt Tob,bric., When the concrete hoe hardened serffidenUy check it with etraightedge Surface smoothness deviations dell not exceed 1/4 inch (I worn) from the wtrolghtedge pieced In any direction, including plow-anent along and spanning any pavement Joint edge. ImmedinetelY grind down with on approved grinding machine ore. In a slob .hewing high spots of more than 1/4 inch (6 mm) but not exceeding 1/2 Inch (13 mm) to en Serration that will fall within the tolerance of 1/4 inch (6 mrn) or 1.s. Remove and replace pavement where the departure from the specified crommmtion .wade 1/2 inch (13 rem). 50. lifitiffileovttlammeaLlothransez Meek Manisa. pavement surfaces meth a 10-feet (3-meter) straightedge. Remove and replace any part of the bituminous pavement when the deviation of surface baths. In excess of 1/4 inch (6 mm). After compothion, the thicken,es of ouch bituminous cowmen ohol be within plus an minus 1/2 in. (13 nth) of the iffickneas shown on the Nam. Remove and replaces any part of the bikini.w pavement that Is constructed with lees than the minimum required thickness. 51. Penance! Monies. Tothenes; Lateral deviation from established alignment of the pavement edge shall not exceed plus or minus 0.10 foot (30 mm). Vertical derlotIon from established grade of the pavement shall not exceed plus Or minus 0.04 foot (13 mm) at any point. 52. TameilleletellMie Tope. that be graded to plus or min. 1/2 Inch of the mecified thicken. 53. See ordlitechmel for building waterproofing and foundation domino., 54. Provide as-builts in emordence with aty and Watershed District requirements. Record es-built Information aa constmclion progresses or at appropriate construction interval.. Secure and deliver to the Owner as-built information showing locations, tap, offi in.rt iithations of maintenance hob. cotchbosins, doormats, Inlet end outlet pipe., valve. hydrants, and related structure.. Loa:Rion Um ehall be to permanent landmarks or banning*. 55. Test repods required for project close-out include, but ore not limited to: density test reports, bacteriological tee. on the water system. immure thee the water system, leak tele on the sewereystem, and deflection tests on of l HDPE SITE CLEARING: 1. r P eg erf ,, %rn rn. a n il t. cle e.n orf u rtund h zrIbbreg work In accordance with the provbions of 1/NOCIT Standard Sp.irthation Section 2101. and the additional 2. Clearing la defined as the complete removal and disposal of all portions of natural and ortifidal objectionable material, structure. asphale concrete, mummery. trees, shrub.bushes, windfalls, gram sod, and other vegetation in the deeignoted areas that exist on the mrlace except stomps. Grubbing ie defined as the excavation, removal, and Romeo' of all portions of note.' and °Meld objectionable materials, eruct... trees, One's, bushes, Medals, and other vegetation that exist below ground induding stumps. 3. Clean and grub the meethiction area in advance of the grading operation. Avoid rernovd of trees and surface vegetation wherever possible. Schedule construction in order to expose the smallest erection area of see at any given Ume. Implement appropriate construffion phasing. vegetative buffer strips, on slope grading, and other construffico practices thot minimae eroskon. 4. Btletringeasie Completely remove all stumps. roots 40 mm (1.5 inches) In diameter or larger, buried logs, and all other objectionable material occurring within the lines of the n. building and to horizontal distant. of 4,5 m (15 feet) beyond the building walls. 5. ether Ames Grub all stumps, roots 40 core (1.5 Inches) in ofiameter or larger, boded loge, and all other objeffienathe material occurring within the grading limits to a depth of not lees than 1 m (3.28 feet) below the existing ground mrfoce or subgrode excavation, whichever is deeper. 6. Back. and compact all depressions resulting from the clearing and grubbing operation with suitable material in order to make the surface conform to the original adjacent swims of the ground. 7. Alter the site ha. been cleared and poor to any cutting or filling operations, strip all topsoil and organic soils from arms to be built upon. poved, or where grade. ore to be changed more then 152 mm (6 Inches). Strip the pining taps. to whatever depths encountered. Prevent intemningling with underlying sibs., or other objectionable materiel. Remove heavy growths of greed Iron, argue before dripping. Where trees are to be lert standing, atop topsoil stripping a sufficient distance away Born the trees In order to prevent damage to the mein root system. 8. Stockpile soil to be re-used In en area dear of the new mistruction. Remove .ccs. sell from the site. 9. Construct elockpiler In a manner that will freely drain aerie.. water. Motet:an .ail dockpli. free from debris and trash. Do not obstruct site drainage. Do not exceed a stoekplie depth of 13 feet. 10. Keep the soli stockpile damp In order to prevent drying end dust. 11. Install Offence or other effecUve sediment controls around all temporary soil stmkplles. Locale soil or dirt stockpiles such that the dothslope drainage length Is no lees than 8 m (25 fest) from the toe of the pile to a eurface water, Including stormwater comeeyances soh as curb and gutter systems. or conduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in plam for the starrewater. If remaining for more thin7 days, stabilize the elockplks by muddling. vegetothe cover. tarp, or ottown means. Curing street repair. cover construction soil or dirt stockpiles located cloesr than 8 m (25 feet) to a madeay or drainage channel with tarp., and protect dorm sewer Inlet. with sit sacks or stoked eltlence. REMOVAL NOTES: 1. The eubeurfacs trilby Infommalon shown on this plan le Wfity Gaiety loud D. This quality level woe determined according to the guldefnes of a/ASCE 38-02, entitled 'Standard Guideline for the COleetion and Depiction Of Dieting Subsurface Utiely Dater' by the FHA 2. The locations of miffing Webs ehorn on trio plan are from record Information. The Engineer does at guarentn that off exierthg Wits. are shown or, N shown, exist In the locations indicated on the plan. It b the Contractors responsibility to ascertain the final vertical and horizontal location of oil slating cNilks (Including wirier and sewer lines and oppurtenanms). !batty the Engineer of any discrepancies. 3. The Contractor b solely remonelble for all utak last.. Contact utility companies for locutions of all public and private utilities within the Weft, area prior to beginning mnstruction. Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at (651) 454-0002 In the Minnemporiryst. Paul metro area, or 1-800-252-1166 elsewhere in Minnesota for erect 'earl/one of existing utilities at !sect 48 working hour. (not Including weekend. and holidays) before beginning any c.struction in accordance with Minnesota Statute 2160. Obtain licked number and meet with repreaentaUves of the various Wallets at the cite. Provide the Owner with the ticket number information. Gopher State One Call Is a free Bence that locates municipal and utility company Fn., but does not locale private utility Ins. Un an independent locator service or other means in order to obtain Imotone of private talky line. Including, but not limited to, underground electric cables. telephone, IV. and born eprinIder In... 4. Buildinge, fmturee, surfaces, and other de.riptive references shown on this drooling an, for informotionol purposes only. Field verify all Information relevant to the project prior to proceeding with the work. thel the site and determine ace vile conditions and hazard.. 5. Examine all local condOiene at the He, and amens responeibirity as to the grades, contour. and the character of the earth, ending conditi.. Oink location., and other Kerns that may be encountered during excavator work above or below the tabling grades. Review the drawings. epedficollons, and geotedvnicol report covering this work and become familiar with the anticipated site comet/ens. Notify the Owner and Engineer immediately if any disempancies or unthown utilities are found that impact the design or impair conduction. 6. tingly the Omer aid Engineer Immediately of any changes or unforeseen conditions that could result in additianal mat as soon as they ore discovered so that they eon be properly documented. Failure to notify or covering un-withessed work chatk resift in rejection of claims for additional compeneation. 7. Protect all structuree and landscaping not labeled for dernortion from damage during c.atruction. Provide protective coverings and embower. necessary to prevent damage to edelIng work that Is to remain. Existing work to remain may Include Kerns such as trees, Mm's, e/midis. drives. curbs, uUrbes, buildings end/or other structures on or adjacent to the demolition site Provide temporary fences and barricade. one required for the safe and proper execution of the work and the protection of persona and property. Provide building surveys and seismic monitoring in locaUone where demolition, excavation, underpinning, pile daring, compacting, or similar work le to be performed adjacent to or In the vicinity of existing structure. Reborn any on-site or off -site areas disturbed directly or Indirectly due to construction to a condition equal to or better than the siding condition. B. Irstoll high density polyethylene safety fence. 4 ft. high. International orange, at the Drip Line or of the Critical Root Zone, whichever Is greater, of trees to be preserved. 9. Install construction entrance and perimeter control as soon ea demolition operations allow. 10.11 Material bee.ed to be asbestos or pdychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) or other elmilar hazardous or tondo subetances ore found. Immediately stop work and report the condition to Us Miner end Environmental Engineer in writing. If suspected material is detemdned to be asbestos or PW or a eirnear hozarda. or boric 'vbs.., do not commence work until the material her been rendered harmless or removed. 11. UmR corstrucUan actIvitbs to the consfructkn limite shown on the plans. 12. Perform all work in aemrdence with the lave, ordinances, rule*, regulatiene. and orders of any public authority having jurisdiction. Secure and pay for permits. cow...enlal fow and thens. necemary for the proper execution of the demolition work 13. Prior to the dart of ony dernoliton or. disconnect or amass for the disconnection of utak salvias connections to buildings/structures to be demolished such as water, gas, electric. cable, and telephone In accordance with the regulortiors of the utility mncerned. Re-use of any existing services shell be alsewer. the discretion of the utility other. Seed storm and sanitary .wen laming from structures to be demolished. Coordinate removal of private INthies with each individual utility owner prior to conetruction. 14. Completely remove exieting concrete and mosonry structures that are located within the proposed building and future building expansion area. NI other siding existing sewer and watermain pipe. that as to be obandoned shell either be removed, or completely filled with sand or lean Mx grout. All other miffing sanitary sewer and dorm sewer structures that ore to be obondoned h Mace shoe be oband.ed by first breoling the bottom. of the aboctures and then filling them with sand or lean grout. 15, Dem.eh and remove existing buldirgs, heds, and other structures as indicated. Demolleh existing buildings, structur., feeling., floors. and foundations completely, Including basement. Completely remove deeps, step., porches, porta, and eimilor corthoiction. Completek remove floor construction, including basement., rmordless of elevation. Completely remove dolma., furnace. piping content., debris, and oil other material. from vrithln the existing baserrsnte. 16. Coordinate relocation of tally poles with the local WFAy companies. Restore ony dmtrlc bondhdes, Nebo.. power poles, by lines, or dominions dieturbed by the construction activities In accordance with the requirements of the utility owner. 17. Blasting is not allowed. Demon. Kimono, wails km email mato. 18, thoroughly wet down construction during demolition in order to present the weed of duet. 19, Remove all siding pavement and base material that conflict. with the proposed pavement, grading, and structures. Straight line sow-ort existem bituminous or concrete seaming at the perimeter of pavement removal oreos. 20, Refer to the construction document. for areas of roadways that are required to be disturbed for utility Installation. 21. Remove all endsUng mortem features Ineluding, but not limited to, concrete and bituminous pavement, concrete and bituminous curbing, mammy. fencing, retaining Ovalle, seven walks, concrete apron., db. lighting and Mated foundations, site spedlk demoge and related foundation., bollards, landscaping, and staimays within the construction knits unless ffisorise rot.. 22. All facilities to be removed shall be undercut to suitable subgrade material and brought to grade eith suitable compacted MI material In accordance with the epacificatione. 23. Remove all portable curbs within pavement remmal areas. 24. Remove deb., waste. and rubbish promptly from the wile. On-elte burial of debris le not permitted. Bum no debits on the site. Solvoge material not otherwise indicated to be eau.ed shoe become the Contratoes property owl Is to be removed prcernptly from the site and disposed of in debt accordanoe with Al appicable law. regulations, and/or stake.. 25.0n a nighty bads, leave the wale Ale in a condbon that minimizes the potential for erosion. 28. Provide site security as nmessory In order to prohibit Vandallam and theft during and after normal teak ham throughout the duration of the contract. 27. Maintain vehicular comes to the site for delivery and impection during maned operating hours. Al no point throughout the duration of the contract eholl cirmletion of odjecent streets be blocked without approval by the City. 28. Refer to the Architectural plane for additional rernovob. CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 DEPAR TiviLNT 1SW CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55423 DATE REVSION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS FLAN, SFECF CAT ION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER hlY DRECT SUPERVISION MID THAT INA A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE 0 MINNESOTA Ends Mundityk DATE 01/1612023 21468 INFORMATION PROJECT NO 22-556 ERNAII BY Im CHECKED BY on APPROVED BY tivn SCALE gapnc DATE 0111112025 EESCRIFT;ON GENERAL NOTES SHEET 152 C4 22-558 T. , R. , S. Jul DRAWING: \\wryer \ Project° \2022\122-558 US Internet - 6414 Xerxes Avenue South - Edina, MI1\2023-01-16 \22558010.dirg LAYOUT: C4 - General Notes XREF: XREF: survey %REF: Medan SITE GRADING: 1. Visit the site. Become familiar with the site and exkUng site conditions Including available son reports. Thiamine all local conditions at the site, and auurne reaponsibility a! to the modes, contours, and the character of the earth, existing conlfflong, and other items that nay be .countsnael during ...oration work oboe or below the existing erodes. Review the droving, and specHications coming Vie work and become tomato. filth the anticipated site conditions. 2. Unless otherwise noted, all map.. grade. Mown aro finished grade. Finished gr..s at points between epot ekvat1.1 or contours on determined by uniform slopes between ha given grades. MI proposed spot ekvatkne shown at curbilnes ore to bottom of curb (guttertine) sinless 01/NrIVIse indicated. 3. At locatkons where new work connects to existing work, field verify exleUng elevations and grades prior to beginning the new work Match existing grades at constniclion Smite. 4. If groundwater Is encountered In the may.. or If the imposed sole are wet and unstable. contact the Owner er the Engineer for r.ommendatIons front the Geotechnical Engineer. 5. Due to the location of adjacent structures, it may be necessary to apply slope stabilizaU. technlqu. In order to excavate to the final foundatkn elevations. Refer to the geolechnicol report by the Geotechnical Engineer for requirement. regarding acceptable methods. Remove all uroultable oterkl (or.nic soils, uncontrolkd fill, debris, ond natural or ornficial obstructions) In the zone from 1 m (3.28 feet) below the finished .ubgrade to finkhed eubgrade in the proposed pavement mos. Compact bockfill in all utility trenches to 95% Standard Proctor mcoirnurn dry density (ASTM 13698-78 or Al5/163 T-99) horn the pipe zone to within 1 rn (3.28 feet) below the finished bgrace, and 100% Standard Proctor nucdmum dry density In the Anal 1m (3.28 feet). Provide density lade In backlit. and fill. placed beneath footings, slobs, and pavement. At least one compaction test is required for artery 100 feet of trench at vertical intervals not exceeding one foot. B. Compact all fill placed In pavement are. In mordance with MNDOT Standard Specification 2105.3.11 (Specified Density). Compost all fill placed wader bonding. in accordance with the re.mmendations of the Geotechnical Engineer. ft Comply with the requirements of 0.5.11A. 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, 'Excavation' (www.ogha.gov) 29. Construct all proposed sideslopes with grade. not emeding 3:1 (3 horizontal to 1 verUcol), unless otherwise indicated. 30. Provide pada« droimge oway from Wading, at all times. 31. Teel roll the building and pavement anao in the pr..w of the Geolechnicol Engineer. Perform bose preparation ond test rolling prior to curb and gutter construction, placing of gravel base, and/gravel cub-Dose, bituminous stabilized base, or plant mixed bituminous lose on all street and pavement areas. Test roll the area between 300 mm (12 inches) outside of the bock of the curbs on either aide of the paved areas. Use a heavy pnesrmaUc-tired roller, towed by suitable tractive equipment. with two wheels mooed not lees than 1,800 non (71 inches) opal (transversely canter to center), tire Sae equal to 18.24 or 18.25 (113' wide) Inflated to a pressure of 650 lard (91 pe), and a groin mass of the roller not less than 13.5 metric tons (14.9 tons) and not more than 13.7 metric torn (15.1 tons). Test roll the above specified area In a manner such that each part of the area comes In contact with one of the tine at kast once. Operate the Mani roller at a stood of not less than 4 km/h (2.5 mph) and not more than B km/h (5 mph). The subgrade shall be considered unstable If, at the time that the henry roller paesea over the «bgrade, the surfoce chows yielding or rutting of more than 50 mm (2 Inches), measured from the original surface to Do bottom of the rutCornet any soft spots or divorcement. which appear during the teat roiling by scarifying, °grating or watering, and roc...tine as required to obtain stabinty; or by excavating to cold materiel and baddillIng withmaterial suitable for Mao construction. Remove material such as vegetation. rubbish, large stones. peat, and wet clay. Retest the area after .rection. No test roll shall occur within 10 Net of any subsurface dorm water retention/detention mem. 32. Perform soil correction procedure. and compocUon In accordance with the soils report 33. Remove all fill soils from beneath all building foundations and their 1 to I horizontal conniving area. Nolo. with on engineered All. Refer to the Geotechnical Report for details. Coordinate Inspection and approval of the bottom of all foundation excavation, with the Geotechnical Engineer. 34. Coordinate inspection and opproval of all subgrades within the bulking and pavement areas with the G.technical Engineer. Coordinate inspection and appnaval of all fill material, prior to plosion.« within the bolding and penmen' areas with the Golechnical Engineer. Use only uncontaminated fill material. 35. Conduct on grading operations in a manner that minimizes the potential for site erosion. 36. Grade the Me to the finished elevations Morn . the pion. Import embankment material, or remove and dispose of excess asmaterkl ea 'squired. Provide wade areas or disposal sites for excess motional Including, but not limited to, excavated material or broken cancrvto that Is not d.elreble to be incorporated Into int rook involved . this project. Deterntinatkn of material Import and export quantities ts eddy the r.ponsibroty of the Contractor and the coat of material Import and export Is incidental to the contract. 37. Scarily areas to r.eho aggregate surfacing to a minimum depth of B Inch. and compact to 95% Standard Procter Maximum Dry Density (ASTM 0698) with the moisture content al the soil at the time of compaction not less thon 2 percentage points below and no more than 2 percentaee points above the conte moisture content. 38. Protect existing trees In the boulevard during emotructIon by installing temporary fence around them. 39. Inotoll high density poiyethylenc eafety fence, 4 ft high, international orange, at the Drip Uoc or at the Critical Root Zone, whkhever 13 greater, of significant trees/woodknda to be preemie.. 40. Structurally support exterior ohm, dorms, and dabs at each entry into the binding on frost-depth foundations bearing on footings at ked 5 feet below final grade. Securehy tie the foundation walls to the rcoUngs with steel reinforcing so that any frozen soil adhering to them does not heave them off of their footings. Floor lr,ulatlon along all Odes of the verticol foundation walla In order to prevent freezing of the bacilli to the walla. Provide at ban 4 Inches of void apace between the bottoms of the step, stoop, or dab and the underlying son In order to tallow for eon heave. Dowel all abutting walkway. Into the stoops. 41. Tokroncee The compkted eulograde under siaba and pavement creco shall be compacted, free from irreguks «dove <hang., and fine-graded not more than 16 mm (0.05 feet) above or below the specirkd subgrode ekvation. The .tipried ...grade in other are. shot be compacted, free from Irregular «dace change, and fine-groded not more than 30 mm (0.10 feet) above or below the opeoHisci «Mpg. devoUon. The completed top of topson shall be compacted, Are, from Irregular surtow changes, and fine-graded not mole than 16 nun (0.05 feet) above or below the specified finished grade elevation. 42. Choose equipment and work procedures that will not dietab the sobered. sone. Route c.druction traffic away from foundation soils and areas of ponernents and slabs in order to minim. soil disturbance. H the construction equipment causes reciting or coil pumping, then switch to other types of equipment or melba.. The Contractor to solely responsible for the proper rolectico of conetmchon equipment in order to avoid disturbing .011. on the site. 24.11 le typical to obbrevide spot derotione. Elevatione Mown or 12.8 or 12-1 ore understood to mean 912.8 Of 912.1 respectively. 25. Protect oil newly graded or.s from baffle and erosion. Keep all newly graded areas free from Mash and debris. 28. Repair and reeetoblIsh grades In .tUed, eroded. and rolled crane. Restore erodes to the specified tolerance. Re-seed and re-mulch turf 27. Scarify, reeham, resurface, and revamped to the required density all areae dIelorbed by 'subsequent conetructran operations or adverse weather. CONCRETE SLAB NOTES: I. Ni materials required for thin work shall be new material conforming to the requirements for dos, Mod, grade, eke. quaky, and other detail. sp.111led herein or a. shown on the Plans. Do not use recycled or salvaged elegregarc, 0441011k pavement crushed <orkeete, or scrap shingles Unless chord. indicated. the Contractor shall furnish oil required materials. 2. Compact e thick aggregate base in accordance with MNDOT SPEC. 2211.3.D.2.a. 3. Concrete far Exterior Slobs and Pavements. Portland cement concrete for exterior slake shall have a 31 14Po (4,500 pet) minimum 28-day compressive strength with on Or content of 5.5% [h1.5%] of the measured volume or the freshly mixed concrete rod a slump range of 2.-5'. NI concrete shall be In accordance with IANOOT Standard Specification 2461. mho 3F52. Refer to the ONDOT Specifications for complete mh requirements. U. a water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for c.crete exposed to dekers. Concrete aggregates shall be free of organic 'moraine, chert, shale, or °U. deleterercue «batons« 4, Concrete Sealer Apply TK-111-NOTE 28 W Chlorinated Rubber Epoxy Concrete Treatment. or approved equal, to all extol. portland cement concrete pavement. IX-TRI-ROTE 26 W Ie a special formula of chlorinated rubber and epoxy manufactured by TX Products Construction Coatings (www.tkproducts.corn). It is formulated to cure, sod, and harden concrete. 5. AI .ricrele eta. shall be as Indicated on the plane, but not less than V thick with 6 inch x 6 inch - /10//10 wire size welded wire mesh reinforcing. 6. Divide exterior globs Into square panel, of uniforn size generally containing not more than 3 square meter. (36 square feet) of area. 7. Provide preformed exponelon nts using 0.5' thiamine at locations where the concrete adjoins any exioUng fixed objects ouch ao existing pavement. walls, building kundaUons, or joi other rigid etnkturee. 8. Concrete reinfor.rnent volt consist of gahanhed steel nre, rode, and bars. These corr.ion reeletant concrete reinforcing products shall be produced by botch hot dip gahranhing or by continuous hot dip galvanizing. In either wee, zinc coaling, provide Ione lading .rrovian protection. Zinc coated reinforcing steel shall meet the requirements of AST11 A767 Zinc-coated (galvanized) steel bars for concrete renformnent and ASTII A1094 Spedficatko for continuous hot-dip golvanIzed 'teal bore for concrete reinforcement. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: I. Sonoratko of Weer and Sewer Construct sewer and water services In accordance nth Minnesota Rules pad 4714.720 and 4714.721. Provide a minimum horizontol seporotion of 10 feet between all eater and loser lime, including manholes. catch losing, dorm norer, sanitary rover, &oinks, or other potential sources for contamination in accordancewith Minnesota Rules pad 4714.609.6. Measure the seporotion dietonce from the outer edge of the pipe to the outer edge of the contamination mace (outer edge of stouctures, piping. eto.) At wider and sewer crossings. the bottom of the water pipe Located within ten feet of the point of crossing most be at least 12-Inches oboe the top of the sewer. When this le not fmrible, the sewer pipe material mint be approved for use inside of or vOthin a bulking In accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Rules part 4714.701. Only ASTM 01785, D21355, 1891, or F1488 Schedule 40 PVC may cross above or leo. than 12 inches below potable water lines (see Minnesota Rules part 4714.720.1). No joints or convection, an. allowed on the water Iia within 10-feel of the crossing. 2. Watoonaln MOM Maintain 8-feet of cover over the top of the water Ones to the finished grade. Verify elevation of proposed and existing water lines at all utility crossing.. Install the water lime at greater depths In order to dear storm sewer., sonttary sevens, or other utilities as required. Include costs to lower water lines In the base Old. 3. Dtidafectiox Midget an .rnpleted welcoming In accordance with AIWA Standard 0651. If the tablet or continuo. feed methods are used, disinfect the completed watermain with water that contwine at feast MRgra of available chlorine in oasordance with Minnesota Rules pod 4714.609.9. Do not use the tablet method on solvent-welded piastic or on soneed-jelnt .tea pipe because of the danger of fire or explosion from the reacUon of the faint compounds with the calcium hypochlorite. Retain the treated water In the pipeline for at level 24 hone Ircoeure the chlorine ...dual at the end at the 24 hour period. The tree <Alpena residual must be at least 10 mg/I measured at any point In the The. Lleagurement of the chlorine concentration at regular Intervale «an be In mordance with Standard Methods, AMIA M-12, Of Wing oppropdate chlorine test Ills, 4. Testing: Pressure test and perform bactericiogical tests on all water linea under the supervision of the City Public Works Department NotNy the illy at least 24 working hours poor to any testing. Pressure test the water system tat the with Winrosoto Rules pad 4714.609.4. Pressurize the waterline to a water meson, of 1034-kPa (150-.1) gauge preseure (measured at the point of lowest elerction) by moons of a pump conn.ted to the pipe In a satisfactory manner. Do not add water to the «kopek In order to maintain the required preeoure during the water mob pressure testing. Ifiniarctio Droartment cl I show and Induehy. The test section of pipe shall withetand the teat without leallng for a period of not less than 15 minutes. 111..00to Department of lima: The wotermain shall be pm.. ter. at 150-psi for at least two hour. with not more than a 2-psi premium drop during the last hour of the test 5. HI water supply piping connected to municipal water main mud have a 150 psi minimum pressure rating. 6. Copper tube for water services must comply with AST.. 1388 and shall have a weight not less than Type L (In ac.rdence with Minnesota Rules part 4711.604.2). 7. Polyvinyl Chbride (PVC) Bonding Water Services must comply with A5711 01785, A5711 02241, or AIWA C900; pressure rated for water (S. Minnesota Rule. pad 4714.604). Do not !WM PVC water service pipe under or within any building, structure, or pod thereof. 8. Polyethylene (PE) Bonding Water SeMces most comply with the requirements of AIWA Standard 0901; pressure rated for water (See Minnesota Rules pad 4714.604). Do Dot instal PE water eervice pipe under or within any building. Much., or part thereof. PE pipe ranges In nominal she from 3/4 In. (19 mm) through 3 In. (76 mm) and conforms to the outside-diameter (00) dimenvions of iron pipe size (IPS). PE tubing ranges in eh* from 3/4 in. (19 mm) through 2 in. (51 mm) and contortms to the 00 daneneions of copper tube she (CIS). 9. Woke Iron pipe (DIP) soler s•Mces must comply with MYNA C151/ANSI A21.51 or AIWA 0115/ANSI A21.15 (See Minnesota Rules part 4714.604). Use Thickx., M ea SO DP with push-on joints. Use petroleum resistant gaskets, Nitrite (NOR), or approval equal. Use only ANSI 316 stainless steel bobs and note on all «Lennon fittings, mho, and hydrants. The exterkr of ductile Iron pipe shall be coated with a layer of arc-sprayed zinc per DO 8179. 10. polyekylene Sheet Or Tubes For Corroglon Protection Of Buried Ductile tram Polyethylene encasement Is required on oll boded ductile Van pipe, fittings, sabres, and other appurtenance.. Polyethylene encasement met comply with AIWA C105/ANSI A21.5. Use V-Ko Enhan.d Polyethylene Encasement (v<ww.mcwoneductile.com) or °moved equal. 11. PoThinvl Chloride MCI Wotemoto Use AWWA C900 for all PVC «domain fornlehed with integral daelonteric bell and epigot joints; minimum promote Class 150; dimension ratio not greater then 18; laying length 20 feet EBAA Iron, inc., 'Series 2000 P/ klegalug; or approved equal for rennin! on C900 PVC watermain. Use only ANSI 316 stank.a steel bolts and nuts on all waterrnain fittings. vetiver, and hydrants. 12. Use mechanical joint restraint deme. for joint restraint . oil waterrnain bends booing o vertical or horizontal deflection of 22-1/2 degrees or greater, an valves, stubs. extensions, blinding ServiC139, tet, .osses, plugs, an hydrant valves, and oIl hydrants in ccordance with Coy requirements. Use 'Series 1100 liegalue manufactured by BMA Son Inc., Eastland, Tercet or approved equal, indolkd In accorda a nce with manufacturer's recommendations for restraint on Wale Iron Pipe. Restraining dart., me to have epoxy coating or approved equivalent. Refraining device hardware shall be ANSI 316 etainless steel, or approved equivalent. 13. Waterman Votves At all vane 1000000. which require a le ar smalkr valve. Install gate voNes whkh are of the compreadon reeillent seated (CRS) type. Use American Flow Control's Series 2500 D.Ule Iron Resilient Wedge Gate Valve, or approved equal. Gate vol.. shall conform to AMNIA 0509, Install can Iron valve M. conforming to AS11.1 AM at each naive location. Valve boxes shall be the three-piece type with 5-1/4' shaft, U. Tyler 61360-G with No. 6 hoe, or equivalent. Valve boxes shall have at least 6' of adjustment above and betow fiddled grade. Drop mere an valve boxes shall be round and bear the word 'WATER' cast on the top. Use bier 6860-C "Stayput* covens with extended Old, or equivalent AN valve hardware ,hag be MIS 316 et oinks. sleet or approved equivalent 14. GurbYstbraandtiossai Use Lluelkr N-10334 extendon type curb box with Minneapolis pattem base, Cf approved equal, at all t' through r curb stop Roane.. Stationary rod le required on 01 curb nom. U. M.O. Company Mark II Oriseal No. ii-1515414 curb stop, or approved equal, and Ital.. Mel stem rod. IS. Trace Wire. Install locating wires on all conductive and non-conductive storm sanitary sewer, and water lines In accordonce with the Minnesota Rural Water Assockrtion (IARIVA) Trace WireSpecific:anon Guide and Details (vmernrwo.com/PDF/Tra.MinoSpecCuldeFinalweb9.01). Use /12 HOPE-insulated copper-olod steel Ore noted for underground service. The odor of the insulating jacket shall be as follows groundured, storm sewer=green, sanitary sewer-green, and water line.-Nue. Install the wire en the bottom side of the pipe below the spring line. Fasten the wire to the pipe with tape or daelk Ike at 5' intervals. Do not wrap the trace wire around the oarresponding sanity. Do not connect the tnw wire to existing conductive Alines. Use Copperhead Dryconn 3-Way or Locking Snake Bite .nn«tors rated for underground direct bury applications or approved eq.I at an crossings or service connections. Twist on connectors are not allowed. Troce wire must be property grounded at oil dead end. and services. Inetall grade-level/In-ground trace wire access boxes and drive-In magneclum grounding onocks at all dead ends, servicee, and fire hydrants. Trace wire once. boxes shall be color coded as follo.: Moroi sower=green, sanitary sew...green, and water IS...blue. 16 Detoutobliktarntiola.; Inetoll detectable underground warning tape directly above all underground Wkn at a depth of 457 mm (18 Inches) below finished grade, unless otherwise Indicated. Underground coming tape Small be 3-inches vide with a minimum 5.0 mil overall thickness. Tape shall be manufactured using a 0.8 mil clear virgin polypropykne film, reverse printed and laminated to a 0.35 mll sold aluminum tot core, and then laminated to a 3.75 mil clear virgin polyethylene film. The aluminum backing make. underground assets easy to find using a non-fernaus kooks Tape shall be printed using a diagonally striped deeign for maximum visibility and meet the AMA Color-Code stondard for identification of burled utilities. U. Pro-Un Safely Products (wsnsprolinesafety.em) detectable marking tape or approved equal. 17. Threaded hose connections including hose bib. and hydrant! 'noel include a back flow prevention device In accordance with Minnesota Ruin. port 4714.0603 and UPC part 603.0. Wall hydrants most nowt ASSE Standard 1019 (see Table 603.2). Where permitted by the odrninistrative authority. wail hydrant. rroy alike non-removable ASSE 1052 backflow prerentere or non-rernimble ASSE 1011 vacuum breakers and provision le mode to protect from freezing (en. Llim.ota Rus, Chapter 4714, Sections 603.5.7, 312.6, and 301.1.2). 18. lend Corded; All nerdy Installed or replacement pipes, pipe frtUngs, plumbing fittings and fixture, including boklow prevent., that ore Installed on potable water eystme or 'systems that are designed to dircibute water for potable use, arc required to meet the Reduction of Lead In Drinking Water Act, sinkh establishee a maximum lead content of 0.25 percent by weighted average of the wetted surfaces See kennesota Rules pod 4714.604.2. Solder and flux for potable water systems shall contain le. than 0.2 percent lead. JoInte mod Include non-moorslve non-toxic poste-type flux complying with A57/4 0613 (see Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4714, Section 605.1.4). 19. Bring oil site OM. to 2' outside of the bonding The Olin the emotion of the water service. Extend water "nice loth the building and up through the floor to the flange for the water mites Do nut inetoll Pot water ognAce pipe under or within any bulking, structure, or part thereof. 20. On not exceed the manufacturer's specifications for curvature of pipe and deflection at pipe joint. Securely oboe all open ends of pipe and fittings With Watertight plugs when work Is not in programs. Keep the interior of ail pipes dean and remove any dirt or &DM from joint surfaces after the pipes have been lowered into the trench. Install all valves plumb and located according to the plans. FILL, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION: 1. The Contractor shall retain the services of an independent Testing Laboratory in order to perform continuaus full-time err-Ste geotechnkal observation during shipping, rough grading, excavaUng, filling, and bockfilling operations. DO NOT common. or perform any of this work without the presenw of the Tooting Laboratory. 2. The Contr.tor doll retain the seMce. of an Independent testing loboratory to perform analysis of fill materials and denetty testing. 3. Perform di fill, back.. and compaction in ...rd.w with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report. 4. Mow no standing Seder In areas to receive fill or backfill. Keep areas free of water during placemoot and compacnon. Do not platy backfill or fUl material on «dotes that ore muddy, frozen, or that contain frost or iv.. 5. Prepare ground surface to reed. fill by ramming vegetation, debris, unsallslactory .11 antedate, mud, and otntrucUons. Correct any soft or urntable spot. by scarifying, wetting or drying, ond co panting the upper 0.6 m (2 feet) of the subgrade to density requirements for the backfill material. Use a smooth drum vibratory roller for final compaction. Remove soils that connot be consolidated to provide a firm layer of support, and reptiles them with suitable material. Scarily as required ea that fill material will bond cell The exbUng eurfoce. 6. Maintain the moisture content of HI and backfill within is 3 percent of the optimum etch that the required degree of amPostiort inn be obtain.. Sprinkle colter on the eurface of eubgrade or kyers of soil material where soil le too Ory to permit compaction to the required density. Remove and replace, or scarify and air dry, sol material that is too wet to permit commotion to the required density. 7. 14,.°ran thereof. t ialkcs the fit layer to exceed 0.3 meter. (I foot) without teriUng the fill layer. Mktimum number of teats are per unit area per frtt or 8. If sober.ee or fills that have been placed ore below specified dusky, provide additional compaction and testing totil «torothe or fills meet or exceed specified density at no additional expense to the Owner. 9. Snl Correction; Remove all unsuitable fit le from beneath the bonding footprint. beneath all bundling foundations, and their 1 to 1 horizontal overvizing ar.. Replace with compacted engineered fill material. Refer to the 'C.2 Design Considerations secUan of the Geotechnical Report for &toile Coordinate inepection and approval of the bottom of all foundatko excavation. with the geotechnical Engineer. COMPACTION REOUIREMEHTS ITEM DESCRIPTION METHOD OF TEST (STANDARD PROCTOR) MINIMUM pERCENT Of MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY MINIMUM NUMBER CP TESTS PER 0th AREA PER UFT Natural Subgrode Surfaces at the bottom. of excavations ond bottoms of footing lamellae ASTM 13690 95% 1 per 418 eq. meters (4,500 eq. ft.) and 1 per column pad location General Balding Fill Non-structural or.. beneath the building slab outside of the 111 overeize zone below the footings ASTIR 6898 98% 1 per 84 eq. meters (900 sq. ft) Footings Within the 1:1 oversize zone below the footings ASTM D698 98% 1 per 15 meters (50 feet) an center and 1 per column pad location Exterior Sid. of Foundation Wells Backfill on exterior sides of foundation coils (non-structural areas above the top of the footing devotion) ASTM D696 95% 1 per 418 sq. meters (4,500 sq. ft.) Fill Under and Within 10 Feet of Either Side of Pavement and Concrete Areae External, non-eturctural cr., zone from the bottom of the Tl and backfill to within 1 rn (3.28 feet) below the finished subgrode AS111 D598 95% 1 per 418 eq. meters (4,500 sq. ft) Fill Under and Within ID Feet of Either Side of Pavement and Concrete Areas Extemol, non-sturctural areas, the zone from 1 m (3.28 feet) below the finished subgrade to finished subgrade ASTM D698 100% 1 per 418 eq. meters (4,500 sq. ft.) interior and Exterior Slabs, Stoops, and Ste. Fill placed which supports Interior ond exterior concrete Sobs, stoops, and Steps (outside of the I:1 oversize zone below the footings) AS114 0898 95% 1 per 418 sq. meters (4.500 eq. ft) Lawn or Unpaved Areas Under lawn or unpaved areas ASTM D698 so% 1 per 836 sq. meters (9,000 sq. ft.) CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 FLANNING DEPARTMENT / 1 ( 141W CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55423 FTE BE 01-slo, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS FLAN, SPECFICAT ION. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY /.1E OR UNDER I.IT DRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AMA PAY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE C. MINNESOTA Lu) z ta4= Enant..11.Anto, DATE 01/1E/2023 NO 2240 11110.F1,1STIC., FRC:ECT 110 22-5f£ CRAWII BY In CHECFEDBY Os APPRC.VEDE. V. ;CALE graph, DATE 01112023 CEF., T ADDITIONAL NOTES SHEET C5 I 22-558 T. , R. , S. JM DRAWING: \ "neer\ Projecte \ 2022 \ /22 -558 US Internet - 6444 Xerxes Avenue South - Edina, LIN \ 2023-01-18 \ 22558C10.dwg LAYOUT: C5 - Additional Notes XREF: building; XREF: survey; XREF: ',Replan FABRIC COLOR SFOLL BE INTERNATIONAL orturcE 1051 SECTria II TRAP POSTS PM TIE TOOL-MLR PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 INCH sauARE nAROW000, RHE, OR STREAM T- OR U-SECTION STEEL POSTS DO NOT MEW NOXIOUS POST SPACMG OF 4 FT. 0.0. ISO Nus ORECTION OF SURFACE nos sEOTIGTLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ISIDOT STD. SM. 3856 FOR SELF SUPPORTING SILT FENCE REOFOOCE WITH SNOW FENCE, WRE Nast. OR SRF MASTIC FENCE IN AREAS straw CONCENTRATED dais 5004 illi1o01 AS STALES, Ertoas, 14 Miff OF CUMERrs ANI CATCHBASINS) LAY INC Finite AGMIST SEES MD BOTTOM Of THE MENG. 8401011 ASO COIPACT With A VERATORY PAM COIATACthe FATIPC er SOIL usE LATH MO STAPLES 10 ATTACH FA900 TO MOW Pasts. USE TE 0R6 TO ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POSTs. ISE HOG &ES TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WRE MESH SILT FENCE INSTALLATION 614e11011 SUPPORT POST er sot SECTION VIEW 1 TO 2 INCH OUJETER -.."" WASHED ROCK, WIDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3137 CA-1, CA-2, CA-3 OR EQUAL COARSE AGGREGATE PUBLIC 0 INCH MINIMUM THICIOIESS 50 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH MNOOT STANDARD SPECE1CADON 3733 TYPE V PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MATERIA. BENEATH THE ROM • • -",444500- . st•IN Four MINNUM WIITTH 24-INCH HIGH CUr-OFF DIKE WITH MAXIMUM SIOESLOPES OF 4:1 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE KS EMARCNIENrit 2631 CNTIMELL Roth RICHMOND, VA 23234 503-448-3636 PHONE 504-271-3074 FAX NOTES: 1. USE ACF EMARONIENTAL SL150001 sEGMENr COHIROL DDSCE, OR A6PRalic0 EQUAL 2. ripest% ea in KUMAR RCM (40 .46.1N/S0 FT.), AVENGE moth broserirl ECG_ TO 1636 Les./In, ASTM 0-4884. USE RECTANGULAR saissCe ON er.CTSAKEUR reds. USE ROUND SLTSACK ON ROME mins. 3. math AND MAPTTATN 51.1401 IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS FrEcoNIENOADONS. CATCHBASIN INLET PROTECTION REOTAHOUIAR PLAN PAPERIE_AME USER pod PIAVE. RUBBER OR ENWIEERED CLAY) SuposiDed BEIN -IL- 12" MIN. OBIDE 111,011101 Ifx8' WOE SLOPES 61 OR FLARES OR AS REO'D TO CONTAIN WASTE CONCRETE TYPICAI SFC110N IDECEILIE I. SEE 0109CII CORM- RAM FOR LOCUMS OF CONOCIS MGM. K.. S wee or ad nor WOVE VMS 9613 or arm no edam w 00wows Kano, wags) soil BE *ROOM ewe na Asir Celentlt RACIarart ax so a we& M.C100 awns rya s ROOMED AU OE sans P0.11(5) SIOR 5441 E PALM AT 11C eacensanoN ordwar. & reams Awak FISMOS MR TO POORE he 12001121 OF DE LOR,ETE 1.9101.11 WAS CREPORM COXEROE MOO NO MP RCS • =CORM RAMIPL .41 E MUM N PER•ETER SCRY ERSTROTION. CONCLE.32312.6old • TRW ORM WSW. SHALL r MI.11. 041,003 01 CILL4103 O. JO IROM6Yrt tO WORM i KR WM) OaR7isis 7. DO OF CONORIETON..41 COKEETE 1601E F.1 BE FEE., Mil UTE NO DEPOSED OF Kr ASSAM WASTE sne. stew EWER Av ItlSOIR 200 a mud, as awe . y's sea e spasm ern so mese CONTI. WERE • DORM STOW NO OEM MO AIM ALL STOW DOM OLLW-OLR OR CO. ..von 1w ecus. To PRUCTE DAMS TO PRIV. Oe-Ros. ON-SHE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPACIlth DIMAIGENr .ala g. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1 Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc.) before work begins. 2 Establish sediment control practices on ail down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established. 3 Install all perimeter sediment control devices and construction entrances. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term activities, but sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. 4 Contact the City for approval of the sediment control devices. 5 Rough grade the site. 6 Install utilities. 7 Install pavements. 8 Install lawn and landscape. 9 Restore all disturbed areas. 10 Clean all storm sewer and conveyance systems. 11 After all disturbed areas are stabilized, obtain approval from the City and/or Watershed District. 12 Remove all temporary sediment control devices. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. Delineate the location of area* not to be dithsrbed (e.g. with flag, dukes, signs, sat fence, etc.) on the derelopment site before work begins. 2. Avoid tellIOMI of trees and eurface vegetation wherever pomade. Schedule conetruction in order to expose the smaBest practical ore, of soil at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer stripe, horizontal elope eroding, and other construction proctkes that minimize erosion. 3. Following Irani soil disturbance or redisturbanee, complete permanent or tenthonary stabilization against erosion due to min, wind, and running water ae won os pude., but in m case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including eturnwater monegeownt pond sleekest,. Th ie requirement dose not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on wMeh grading, site bolding, or other construction oat/Wile are actively underway. 4. Provide tenworory grate seed cover on all tope-ell etotkplies and other areas of stock:Tied excavated material in order to prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged period. al open, bare earth without groae cover Al not be permitted. debrise ail dieturbed grsenspou or we with a minimum of 4" loped) immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and match, or sod and stoke these area. within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). 5. Stabilize all disturbed areas to be peed using early appikation of gravel Wee. 6. Apply necessary moisture to the condruction area in order to prevent the spread of duet 7. In areas to be permonentty stobiraed, landscape with decorate,. rock, plantings, and sod. Refer to the approved Landscape Plan for design and details T. The street ell be swept dean before the end of each day of active construcnon, when sediment is tracked into the abut. 9. Areas with dope. greater than 3 to 1 and twos next to wetlands/waterbodies graded or exposed during construction shall be protected with temporary vegetation, mulching or other moue as soon os procUcal 10. No concrete washout shall ocur on site unless it is done with an approved lAnneuto Pollution Control Agency (11PC69 device or dondard. 11. Stockpile. shall be surrounded with adequate perimeter control to prevent sedimentation and .rowan. 12. Site shall be kept deon at all lanes and refuse properly untreaed. 13. Temporary pumping shall not be permitted without the use of on opproved Minnesota Poihrtion Control Agency (MPG) device or standard. 14. The contractor shall Inspect, on a wieldy bads and after nM rainfall greater than 0.5-Inchee, al erosion control devices and male any repairs Immediately. An Inspection log shall be kept on site detailing these inspections and repair. preformed. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. Implement sediment Centrd practices in order to minimize sediment from entering surface rater., including curb ond gutter systems and storm drain inlets. 2. Install oil temporary or permanent sediment control Maser& including silt fence at perimeter of constnicUon, gods 9, or candler land-disTrdngnir lil"rOctke.Ct aarlIderkn'eenth InletsntgartrC'fece4 runo'nntlin? 'thm d1111‘.'nrte'd9. anwe. 3. Establish sediment canted procUtes on all dew percent perimeters befue any up gradient kr& disturbing merit. begin. Thew practices must remain In Pace until final dabilizotion hes been established. 4. The tinning of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term octivilies. but Peddled control poetises must be installed before the next precipitation went even if the short-term &Wry Is not consists 5. If the down gradient treatment system becomes overloaded, Metall additional up gradient sediment control practices or redundant BLIPs in order to eliminate the overloading. 6. Before &Pining conettuction, Install a TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION EN1RANCE at each point when vehicles exit the eenetruttion site. Use 25 mm (1 Inch) to 50 now (2 inch) diameter rock. kINOOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2. CA-3, or equal Coarse Aggregate. Place the aggregate in a layer at lead 152 trim (6 intim) thkk OCIOSS fhe enUre width c4 the entrance. Extend the rock entrance at lust 15 m (50 feet) into the undruction WI*. Use a SHOOT Standard SpedficaUon 3733 Type V peeneable geotexthe fabric material beneath the aggregate in order to prevent migration of soil into the reek from Wow. Maintain the entrance in a condition that will prevent traddng or flowing of &decent onto paved roadways. Provide periodic tea dressing with oddillonal done as required. Clow entrance. not protected by temporary rock construction entrances to all construction traffic. 7. If neuwary, Mean the wheels of canetrucUon vehicle. In order to nane. soils before. the vehicles leave the construction site. Wash vehicle. only on an arm stabile& with stone that drains Into an approved sediment bopping device. 8. Remove all sons and sediments tracked or otherwise dited onto adjacent property, pavement area.. sidewalks, strode, and talky.. Romero)l shall be on a elaily bode throughout the duration of the condrucUon. Clean paved roadway. by shoveling. wet-weeping or dry sweeping. 11 neuesary, paved dela.. In order to loosen compacted !ailment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposer area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment hoe been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 12. 4111 Stnekplie. Inetall salience or other effective sediment controls around oil temporary soil dockples. Locate soil Sr dirt rtackpiles such that the downelope drainage length Is no Mee than 8 m (25 feet) from the toe of the pik to a surface water, including storrnwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systerne, or wields ond ditches unless there is a bypass in pace for the dormwater. tl remaining for more than 7 days, stabilize the docket*" by mulcting. vegetative woven tarps, or other means. During cheat repair, cover conetruction aril or del stockpiles located dour than B m (25 feet) to a roadway or droinage channel with tarps, and protect storm sewer inlets with de. maks or staked silliente. 10. Mild.. Install silt fence along thetour (on a level horizontal plane) with the ende turned up (.1-hooks) Al order to help pond water behind theconfence. Install the silt fence on the uphill side of the support posts. Provide o poet spotting of 1.2 on (4 feet) or lees. Drive posts at lead 0.6 m (2 feet) Into the ground. Anchor the sit fence fabric in o trench at lead 152 mm (0 inehee) deep and 152 not (El inches) wide dug on the upelope side of the support pods. Lay the fabric In the trench and then backbit and compact with a vibratory plate compactor. Make any splice. In the fabric at a fence post. At mike., winker the fabric at Waal 152 mm (6 inches), kid it over, ond securely fasten it to the fence post. Silt fence supporting pods shall be 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or *tended T- or U-section sled posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not Is.. than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb per lineal foot). Pods shall have a nfirenum length of 1524 rnm (5 fed). Poets shall hove projections to fulfils& (adenine the fabric and prevent slippage. Geese-111e fabric deli meet the requirements of MOOT Standard Specification 3886 for preamernbled silt fence, famished in a continua. roll in order to ovoid edit& &dee& fabric shall be unfit= In texture and copiousness and have no defects, flaws, or teary. The fabric chat contain sufficient ultraviolet (I1V) ray inhibitor and Molaroters to peede a minimum two-year service Pe outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 11. Maintain an temporary erosion and sediment control devices In place until the contributing drainage area hoe been stabilized (hard-surfaced arms paved and vegetation established In greenepace). Repair any tilling, gulhc formation, or washouts. After fine establishment of permanent etobilisaUon, remove al temporary synthetic, structural, and nontiodegredable entelon and eediment control devices and any accumulated Sediments. ? t am= Oft , lt:.. ii i . icstore permanent sedimentation basin to their design condition Immediately following 12. if &watering Is required ond sump pumps are wed, all pumped water mad be discharged through a sediment cordon device such os a &watering bog or other appropriate focally prior to leaving the conettuction eke. Proper energy Masipthan must be provided at the outlet of the pump system. POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES: 1. Sold Waste: Gime& of edlected sediment asphalt and corerete mllMgs, floating debris. paper, plastic, fable. conetruction and demolition debris, and other wool. properly off-site in compeonce with Minnesota Pollution Control Agenry requirements 2. Hazardous klandaki Property store oil, gasoline, point and any hasardoun eubetrocee In order to prevent spine, loath or other discharge. Include secondary containment Restrict access to dosage awe In order to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous materials must be in compliance with MPG regulations. 3. fither6021.11121E Dispose of unwed bedding material', garbage, bosh, cleaning wades, toxic materials, and wastewater properly off-site and In compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agenry disposal requirements. 4. Furnish imitable trash contothers and regularly remora the accumulated troth from the premien. 5. Oo not allow solid Sub, hazardous materials, and other matelots shall to be carried by runoff Into a receiving water or storm sewer widen. B. Lind external washing of trucks and other condonation vehklee to a defined area of the ells. Wath vehicles only on on area details& with stone that drain. Into an approved sediment hopping decoke. Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing Le prohibited. 7. fornsiatslashauLDumilgrus Contain as squid and solid wastes generated by concrete waehout ouraUons in a leak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. Oe not allow the Ithuld and solid wastes to contact the ground. Prevent runoff from the concrete &Mod operationa or areas. Crepoee of liquid and solid tweets. properly In compRonce with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations. Indall a sign adjacent to each wothout reality in order to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. 8. Sanitary and Septic Wads; Furnish and install detached portable toilet Tactiles at the construction site. The portable toilets shall be converienUy located for the use of oil worker on the poled. Maintain the facliales in deon, dry, eanitory conMtion In accordance with Minnesota Deportment of Health regaremente. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE: 1. inegat the snore construction eite at load once eves /strut during active construction and within 2.4_110361 after a minion event greater than 0.5 inch& In a 24-hour period. Following an inspection that mere within 24 hours after a rainfall event the next ineuction must be conducted within 7 days after that rainfall event 2. Inspect all erodon prevention and sediment control Meth; infiltration areas. and stabilized oreos. 3. Retied all Inspections and maintenance conducted during construcUon in writing ond keep thee. retard& the inspections and maintenance records must include dote and time of inspections, date and amount of all rainfall events greater thon 0.5 Inches in a 24-hour period, name of persons(a) conducting inspections, finding. of inspection., recommendations for corrective actions, an any corrective actions taken. 4. 1 TO 2 INCH OUJETER -.."" WASHED ROCK, WIDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3137 CA-1, CA-2, CA-3 OR EQUAL COARSE AGGREGATE PUBLIC 0 INCH MINIMUM THICIOIESS 50 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH MNOOT STANDARD SPECE1CADON 3733 TYPE V PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MATERIA. BENEATH THE ROM -",444500- . stIN Four MINNUM WIITTH 24-INCH HIGH CUr-OFF DIKE WITH MAXIMUM SIOESLOPES OF 4:1 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE KS EMARCNIENrit 2631 CNTIMELL Roth RICHMOND, VA 23234 503-448-3636 PHONE 504-271-3074 FAX NOTES: USE ACF EMARONIENTAL SL150001 sEGMENr COHIROL DDSCE, OR A6PRalic0 EQUAL ripest% ea in KUMAR RCM (40 .46.1N/S0 FT.), AVENGE moth broserirl ECG_ TO 1636 Les./In, ASTM 0-4884. USE RECTANGULAR saissCe ON er.CTSAKEUR reds. USE ROUND SLTSACK ON ROME mins. math AND MAPTTATN 51.1401 IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS FrEcoNIENOADONS. CATCHBASIN INLET PROTECTION REOTAHOUIAR FABRIC COLOR SFOLL BE INTERNATIONAL orturcE 1051 SECTria II TRAP POSTS PM TIE TOOL-MLR PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 INCH sauARE nAROW000, RHE, OR STREAM T- OR U-SECTION STEEL POSTS DO NOT MEW NOXIOUS POST SPACMG OF 4 FT. 0.0. ISO Nus ORECTION OF SURFACE nos sEOTIGTLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ISIDOT STD. SM. 3856 FOR SELF SUPPORTING SILT FENCE REOFOOCE WITH SNOW FENCE, WRE Nast. OR SRF MASTIC FENCE IN AREAS straw CONCENTRATED dais 5004 illi1o01 AS STALES, Ertoas, 14 Miff OF CUMERrs ANI CATCHBASINS) LAY INC Finite AGMIST SEES MD BOTTOM Of THE MENG. 8401011 ASO COIPACT With A VERATORY PAM COIATACthe FATIPC er SOIL usE LATH MO STAPLES 10 ATTACH FA900 TO MOW Pasts. USE TE 0R6 TO ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POSTs. ISE HOG &ES TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WRE MESH SILT FENCE INSTALLATION 614e11011 SUPPORT POST er sot SECTION VIEW EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: Delineate the location of area* not to be dithsrbed (e.g. with flag, dukes, signs, sat fence, etc.) on the derelopment site before work begins. Avoid tellIOMI of trees and eurface vegetation wherever pomade. Schedule conetruction in order to expose the smaBest practical ore, of soil at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer stripe, horizontal elope eroding, and other construction proctkes that minimize erosion. Following Irani soil disturbance or redisturbanee, complete permanent or tenthonary stabilization against erosion due to min, wind, and running water ae won os pude., but in m case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including eturnwater monegeownt pond sleekest,. Th ie requirement dose not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on wMeh grading, site bolding, or other construction oat/Wile are actively underway. Provide tenworory grate seed cover on all tope-ell etotkplies and other areas of stock:Tied excavated material in order to prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged period. al open, bare earth without groae cover Al not be permitted. debrise ail dieturbed grsenspou or we with a minimum of 4" loped) immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and match, or sod and stoke these area. within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). Stabilize all disturbed areas to be peed using early appikation of gravel Wee. Apply necessary moisture to the condruction area in order to prevent the spread of duet In areas to be permonentty stobiraed, landscape with decorate,. rock, plantings, and sod. Refer to the approved Landscape Plan for design and details T. The street ell be swept dean before the end of each day of active construcnon, when sediment is tracked into the abut. Areas with dope. greater than 3 to 1 and twos next to wetlands/waterbodies graded or exposed during construction shall be protected with temporary vegetation, mulching or other moue as soon os procUcal No concrete washout shall ocur on site unless it is done with an approved lAnneuto Pollution Control Agency (11PC69 device or dondard. Stockpile. shall be surrounded with adequate perimeter control to prevent sedimentation and .rowan. Site shall be kept deon at all lanes and refuse properly untreaed. Temporary pumping shall not be permitted without the use of on opproved Minnesota Poihrtion Control Agency (MPG) device or standard. The contractor shall Inspect, on a wieldy bads and after nM rainfall greater than 0.5-Inchee, al erosion control devices and male any repairs Immediately. An Inspection log shall be kept on site detailing these inspections and repair. preformed. PLAN PAPERIE_AME USER pod PIAVE. RUBBER OR ENWIEERED CLAY) SuposiDed BEIN -IL- 12" MIN. OBIDE 111,011101 Ifx8' WOE SLOPES 61 OR FLARES OR AS REO'D TO CONTAIN WASTE CONCRETE TYPICAI SFC110N IDECEILIE I. SEE 0109CII CORM- RAM FOR LOCUMS OF CONOCIS MGM. K.. S wee or ad nor WOVE VMS 9613 or arm no edam w 00wows Kano, wags) soil BE *ROOM ewe na Asir Celentlt RACIarart ax so a we& M.C100 awns rya s ROOMED AU OE sans P0.11(5) SIOR 5441 E PALM AT 11C eacensanoN ordwar. & reams Awak FISMOS MR TO POORE he 12001121 OF DE LOR,ETE 1.9101.11 WAS CREPORM COXEROE MOO NO MP RCS =CORM RAMIPL .41 E MUM N PERETER SCRY ERSTROTION. CONCLE.32312.6old TRW ORM WSW. SHALL r MI.11. 041,003 01 CILL4103 O. JO IROM6Yrt tO WORM i KR WM) OaR7isis 7. DO OF CONORIETON..41 COKEETE 1601E F.1 BE FEE., Mil UTE NO DEPOSED OF Kr ASSAM WASTE sne. stew EWER Av ItlSOIR 200 a mud, as awe . y's sea e spasm ern so mese CONTI. WERE DORM STOW NO OEM MO AIM ALL STOW DOM OLLW-OLR OR CO. ..von 1w ecus. To PRUCTE DAMS TO PRIV. Oe-Ros. ON-SHE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPACIlth DIMAIGENr .ala g. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: Implement sediment Centrd practices in order to minimize sediment from entering surface rater., including curb ond gutter systems and storm drain inlets. Install oil temporary or permanent sediment control Maser& including silt fence at perimeter of constnicUon, gods 9, or candler land-disTrdngnir lil"rOctke.Ct aarlIderkn'eenth InletsntgartrC'fece4 runo'nntlin? 'thm d1111.'nrte'd9. anwe. Establish sediment canted procUtes on all dew percent perimeters befue any up gradient kr& disturbing merit. begin. Thew practices must remain In Pace until final dabilizotion hes been established. The tinning of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term octivilies. but Peddled control poetises must be installed before the next precipitation went even if the short-term &Wry Is not consists If the down gradient treatment system becomes overloaded, Metall additional up gradient sediment control practices or redundant BLIPs in order to eliminate the overloading. Before &Pining conettuction, Install a TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION EN1RANCE at each point when vehicles exit the eenetruttion site. Use 25 mm (1 Inch) to 50 now (2 inch) diameter rock. kINOOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2. CA-3, or equal Coarse Aggregate. Place the aggregate in a layer at lead 152 trim (6 intim) thkk OCIOSS fhe enUre width c4 the entrance. Extend the rock entrance at lust 15 m (50 feet) into the undruction WI*. Use a SHOOT Standard SpedficaUon 3733 Type V peeneable geotexthe fabric material beneath the aggregate in order to prevent migration of soil into the reek from Wow. Maintain the entrance in a condition that will prevent traddng or flowing of &decent onto paved roadways. Provide periodic tea dressing with oddillonal done as required. Clow entrance. not protected by temporary rock construction entrances to all construction traffic. If neuwary, Mean the wheels of canetrucUon vehicle. In order to nane. soils before. the vehicles leave the construction site. Wash vehicle. only on an arm stabile& with stone that drains Into an approved sediment bopping device. Remove all sons and sediments tracked or otherwise dited onto adjacent property, pavement area.. sidewalks, strode, and talky.. Romero)l shall be on a elaily bode throughout the duration of the condrucUon. Clean paved roadway. by shoveling. wet-weeping or dry sweeping. 11 neuesary, paved dela.. In order to loosen compacted !ailment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposer area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment hoe been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 12. 4111 Stnekplie. Inetall salience or other effective sediment controls around oil temporary soil dockples. Locate soil Sr dirt rtackpiles such that the downelope drainage length Is no Mee than 8 m (25 feet) from the toe of the pik to a surface water, including storrnwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systerne, or wields ond ditches unless there is a bypass in pace for the dormwater. tl remaining for more than 7 days, stabilize the docket*" by mulcting. vegetative woven tarps, or other means. During cheat repair, cover conetruction aril or del stockpiles located dour than B m (25 feet) to a roadway or droinage channel with tarps, and protect storm sewer inlets with de. maks or staked silliente. 10. Mild.. Install silt fence along thetour (on a level horizontal plane) with the ende turned up (.1-hooks) Al order to help pond water behind theconfence. Install the silt fence on the uphill side of the support posts. Provide o poet spotting of 1.2 on (4 feet) or lees. Drive posts at lead 0.6 m (2 feet) Into the ground. Anchor the sit fence fabric in o trench at lead 152 mm (0 inehee) deep and 152 not (El inches) wide dug on the upelope side of the support pods. Lay the fabric In the trench and then backbit and compact with a vibratory plate compactor. Make any splice. In the fabric at a fence post. At mike., winker the fabric at aal 152 mm (6 inches), kid it over, ond securely fasten it to the fence post. Silt fence supporting pods shall be 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or *tended T- or U-section sled posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not Is.. than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb per lineal foot). Pods shall have a nfirenum length of 1524 rnm (5 fed). Poets shall hove projections to fulfils& (adenine the fabric and prevent slippage. Geese-111e fabric deli meet the requirements of MOOT Standard Specification 3886 for preamernbled silt fence, famished in a continua. roll in order to ovoid edit& &dee& fabric shall be unfit= In texture and copiousness and have no defects, flaws, or teary. The fabric chat contain sufficient ltraviolet (I1V) ray inhibitor and Molaroters to peede a minimum two-year service Pe outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. Maintain an temporary erosion and sediment control devices In place until the contributing drainage area hoe been stabilized (hard-surfaced arms paved and vegetation established In greenepace). Repair any tilling, gulhc formation, or washouts. After fine establishment of permanent etobilisaUon, remove al temporary synthetic, structural, and nontiodegredable entelon and eediment control devices and any accumulated Sediments. ? t am= Oft , lt:.. ii i . icstore permanent sedimentation basin to their design condition Immediately following if &watering Is required ond sump pumps are wed, all pumped water mad be discharged through a sediment cordon device such os a &watering bog or other appropriate focally prior to leaving the conettuction eke. Proper energy Masipthan must be provided at the outlet of the pump system. POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES: Sold Waste: Gime& of edlected sediment asphalt and corerete mllMgs, floating debris. paper, plastic, fable. conetruction and demolition debris, and other wool. properly off-site in compeonce with Minnesota Pollution Control Agenry requirements Hazardous klandaki Property store oil, gasoline, point and any hasardoun eubetrocee In order to prevent spine, loath or other discharge. Include secondary containment Restrict access to dosage awe In order to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous materials must be in compliance with MPG regulations. fither6021.11121E Dispose of unwed bedding material', garbage, bosh, cleaning wades, toxic materials, and wastewater properly off-site and In compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agenry disposal requirements. Furnish imitable trash contothers and regularly remora the accumulated troth from the premien. Oo not allow solid Sub, hazardous materials, and other matelots shall to be carried by runoff Into a receiving water or storm sewer widen. B. Lind external washing of trucks and other condonation vehklee to a defined area of the ells. Wath vehicles only on on area details& with stone that drain. Into an approved sediment hopping decoke. Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing Le prohibited. fornsiatslashauLDumilgrus Contain as squid and solid wastes generated by concrete waehout ouraUons in a leak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. Oe not allow the Ithuld and solid wastes to contact the ground. Prevent runoff from the concrete &Mod operationa or areas. Crepoee of liquid and solid tweets. properly In compRonce with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations. Indall a sign adjacent to each wothout reality in order to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. Sanitary and Septic Wads; Furnish and install detached portable toilet Tactiles at the construction site. The portable toilets shall be converienUy located for the use of oil worker on the poled. Maintain the facliales in deon, dry, eanitory conMtion In accordance with Minnesota Deportment of Health regaremente. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE: inegat the snore construction eite at load once eves /strut during active construction and within 2.4_110361 after a minion event greater than 0.5 inch& In a 24-hour period. Following an inspection that mere within 24 hours after a rainfall event the next ineuction must be conducted within 7 days after that rainfall event Inspect all erodon prevention and sediment control Meth; infiltration areas. and stabilized oreos. Retied all Inspections and maintenance conducted during construcUon in writing ond keep thee. retard& the inspections and maintenance records must include dote and time of inspections, date and amount of all rainfall vents greater thon 0.5 Inches in a 24-hour period, name of persons(a) conducting inspections, finding. of inspection., recommendations for corrective actions, an any corrective actions taken. Inspect. all ennion prevention and sediment control MUM In ender to ensure Integrity and effectiveness Rep*, os field conditions allow access unless another time frame Is spetifred. 5. Remove accurrelated &dimwit deposits from behind erosion and sediment control deices as needed. Do not ollow sediment to accumulate to a depth of more than one-third of the height of the erodon and sediment • MI devices. Repair, repo, or supplement deteriorated, damaged, rotted, or missing erosion control deem Within 24 hate of discovery, or ae soon as field undalone allow access. 6. Repair, replow, or supplement all an brew when they become nonfunctional or the e•dirnent reach. 1/3 of the height of the Wu. these repairs must be mode within 24 huts of discovery, or oe soon as field conditions allow wens 7. Clean sedimentation basins, storm sewer catch bonne. &dm.. and other drainage Maine oe required In order to mointein their effecOveness. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basin. must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin teaches 1/2 of the storage volume. Drainage and removal mud be completed within 72 hours, or as soon as field condition. allow emus 8. Maud surfou watem (including drainage ditches and conveyance erases) for evidence of *melon ond 2.111/1411i deposition. Remove all datoe ond mailmen deposited. Stabilize areas when "anent removal raw& In exposed sea. Renewl and stobiraation must be completed Pain 7 days of onscovny unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access combed.. If precluded, remove and istabireaUon must take place within 7 days of obtaining access 9. Inspect construction etc velack exit locations for evidence of off-the sediment frocking onto paved meioses. Remove all dnb and sediment. trod& or othenthe deposited onto arliaunt property, pavement amok sidewalks, streets, and alley.. Removal shall be on a dory 110.51 throughout the duration or the continuances. Clean paved roodwoys by shoveling or wt-sweeping. Do not dry weep. K mammary, &rope paved eurfaus in order to lessen compacted sediment moterki prior to sweeping. Had sediment material to a eatable dbposal area. Street walling b allowed only after madman has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 10. Perham any corrective mutates ordered by the City or Waterthed District within 24 taus of notification. Install any additional erosion protection or sediment control measures deemed necessary by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. MATERIALS: 1 Storm Sewer Inlet Probation threes with eedeetrion or vehkie trandh Emengency overflow Is requited. Take care to protect the catch basin curb-box from additional sediment duping over the top of these devices while del allowing for emergency overflow. a. Road Drain Curb & Gutter Wrth nulaceoble der sock. Mantrioctted by 1111.1CO, 799 thee Drive, Shakopee, MN 55379, Phone (952) 233-3055. E (wev.roaddroin.cam).u b. Sat seek Type B, regular flow (50 gpm/ft2), with curb deflector as required. Rectangular dasock on rectangular Inlet.. Round sateuk on round Inlets. Manufactured by ACP EMARONIKEiffAto 2031 Cardwell Rood, Richmond, VA 23234, Phone (800) 448-3838, (varw.oclenvIronmentalcom). 0. Dandy Fovio With curb filter as required. Manufactured by DANDY PRODUC15, 1095 Harcourt Road, Mount Vernon, OH 43050, Phone (600) 591-2284, (ovadondyprulude.com). d. Dandy km; With curb filter as required. Manufactured by DAMN PROCUCTS, 1095 Harcourt Road, Mount Vernon, OH 43050, Phone (800) 591-2284, (ww.dandyproduals.com). e. SeAllnnoni Filter With Sedguard curbguord on required. Available from ERO-TID1, N94 W14330 Gan& Mau Drive, Menomonee Falls, VA 53051, Phone 0681 437-8839, (wwwero-tex.net). 2. Storm Sewer Inlet Prot-Hen (new with no pedestrian or vehlele_tirrffir.); Emergency overflow is required. Take core Na protect the catch basin curb-box from oddiUonal sediment ..coping over the•top of these devIces Wale still allowing for emergency overfloW. a. Japed Drain Tao Slob Mode RD 23 (fits rough opening for 2.03' inlet), Model RD 27 (fits rough opening for 27" Mkt), or Model CO 3067 (fit. Neenah Casting with 35-1/4%17-3/4" dirnenelone). Manufactured by WILCO, 799 Theis Drive. Shakopee, MN, 55379, Phone 0521 233-3055, wrow.roaddrain.com. Do not We In &brio right-of-way. b. infroSnfe Getirnent GM& qnrriec Install geotextle sock on the outside of the baffler In order to trap additional finee. Standard fromee ore &debt. to fit 24" to 30. diameter and 2'03' openIngs. Distributed by ROYAL ENTERPRISES MEM& 30822 Forced Boulevard. Story, IAN, 55079, Phone (651) 462-1766, (www.rowlenterpriew.cern). Do not use In public right-of c. Rock Snake/Rock Sock/Melt too/Rork Tithe Uee only for Inlets after pavement le In alone. Sgt Sifter Tubes distributed by WEsitidi FIBER COMPANY, PO Box 22665, Bokerened, CA 93390, Phone (661) 854-5556, (tentwesternfibencorn). Do not use in public right-of-way. 3. lama Topsoil used for finish grading of areas to be turfed or pinoonted rout the requiremente of MNDOT Standard Speakers= 3877 for tops& barrow modified to contain more than 353 sand. Tops& shall be mune* free of trabeoll. heavy clay, coarse sand, donee, and other object. over 51 min (2 inches) In diameter; and without plants. root.. sticks, and other objectionabk material. 4. Geolextile Fabric for Suberode Stabalthlion fa mouiredl: MNDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V &meads gulden, matelot 5. Sanoorfina Ports for &Menu. 51 mm (2 inch) equate or larger hardwood, pine, or etandard T- or U-section eteel posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not less Mon 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb per lineal foot). Pods shall have a minimum length of 1524 torn (5 feat). Posts shall have probscUons to facilitate fortenIng the fabric and prevent slippage. 6. Siefenre POW- MNDOT Standard Specificatiee 3888 self supporting Ma fence. Furnish In a continuous oil in order to avoid epllus. Cutest/1e fabric shall be uniform In texture and appearance and have no defects, flawe, or tetra The fabric shall contain sufficient ultrovidet (UJ) ray inhibitor and stelairaers to provide a minimum two-year nand. Of, outdoors. Fobric odor shoe be International orange. 7. bugle ale for Temoarary Rock E.nnalnation Entrnnea. 25 nun (I inch) to 50 nun (2 Inch) diameter mak, INGOT Standard Specifkation 3137 G-1, G-2, or G-3 Coarse Aggregate, or equal. B. Geolextlie Feb& for Tema:wary Rock Cc:cement", Entente. MNDOT Standord SpecifIcaUon 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material. 9. Apareaute for Mee and Rock Sediment DIA., 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 Rim (2 Inch) diameter rock, MNDOT Standard Specifkatbn 3137 G-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate, or equal. 10. Rhis13111321Esdkinlatilitaar Bock. and Rook Inlet Edens could of open-cons concrete masonry blotto, dm screen with 12 mm (0.5 Inch) openings, and washed reek. Place open-con concrete masenry blocks lengthwise on their dee around the catchboein inlet. thou wire wenn around the perimeter to the top of the block barrier bee. the mak Is placed. 'The screen acts to parent the rocks from being waked through the blocks. Plate rock against the sire mesh to the top of the blocks. the 25 mm (1 Inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock. LINDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, cA-2, CA-3, or equal Cowes hedged& habil Mo• course. of 8" blocks In order to form a barrier height of 16". 11. Concrete Block for Block and Rook inlet Falter Standard units with nominal face &undone of 18 x 8 Inches. Minimum 8 inch& nominal depth. 12. reaLialearadAlgrLsini112a116ilat min 12 mm (05 Inch) openings 13. Bele& Tightly bound boles of unrolled hay, straw, or other gross locally available from recent cuttings. 14. thodearadoble Emden Contra Blanker In accordance with LINDOT Standard Speciflcation 3005. 15 Erosion Control Matting: Landlok 7121.1 450 Turf Reinforcement Mat manufactured by Proper., Inc. (wwwfloutextlle.cort), or approved equal soil erosion control molting. TO. Stooks; Stoplee used to anchor erosion control blankets shall be U-shaped, 3 morn diameter or heavier steel wire. the span width at the crew shoe be a minimum of 25 nun (1 inch). Staples shall have a length of 250 ran (10 inehes) or more from tap to bottom after bending. 17. B12,1626 Curies Sediment Log, os manufactured by American EXCRISIOr Company herecurlextern), or approved equal. Excelsior Mem shall be weed wed free, lYPE III 9-inch (23-cm) diameter. Excelsior ulor shall be standard (natural). Netting at eoch end of the log shall be secured io aware fiber carrioinment :; LY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 'ARTNIEN-1 NINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED NOTES: 1. All fabric tenets used for erosion and eedimentation control and all other temporary controls doll not be removed unbl the MCWD hoe deferrrined that the site hoe been permanently reetabiraed and shall be removed within 30 days thereafter. 2. Silt fence color shall be international orange. 3. Minimise site sail umpactke. Break up all compacted soil to a depth of at Mast 6 inches before revegetation. 4. Do not dockpfle mom than 50 cu. yde. of soll or other material subject to erosion by wind or water that is not peered, vegetated, endued, sift-fenced cn the down grodient site, or othemise effeeUvehc protected from erosion. 5. Maintain a written log of a0 inspection, maintenance, and repoir active/se related to erosion and sediment control Mathes. 6. Notify the MCWD in writing at the following stage., do not proceed with odd-Atonal etc activity until the 1.1CWO has been notified and allowed two fun business days to inspect the the and confer with the appecont: (o) On completing installation of perimeter erosion and sedimentation confrere. (b) On completing land-disturbing =Maier and putting into place measures for final see stabilisation ond revegetation. (c) When the site has been permanenUy stabilized and revegetated. (41) When all temporary erosion and sedimentation controls have been unloved from the elk. JM DRAWING: \ \ server \ Project. V022\122-55E1 US Internet - 6444 Xerxes Avenue South - Edina, MN\ 2023-01-18 \22558C10.dwg LAYOUT: C6 - Erosion and Sediment Control Notee and Detail. XREF: building; Min wand XREF: sitedon CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55423 DATE REVISION I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECFICATION. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 161,1A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE 0 MINNESOTA Bun Altedstak DATE 01/16/2023 rIG 22-16'.7. INFORMATION PROJECT NO 22-5E3 DRAV64 BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY bhm SCALE Siferbc DATE 01118/2023 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS SHEET 110 C6 f 22-558 A 4 1 lr 25'-0' /. f. 7 74 / 0 0, VES . g Pr MEYER GROUP diP 1 109 I ARCHITECTURE 27 -03/4. 1 10 A I: 0 306 W. Superior St. 1022 Lakeshore Dr. Suite 1600 Ashland, WI 54806 AFI 001 Duluth, MN 55802 , 0 218.727.1330 715.292.6493 www.meyergroupduluth.com ir0 $ 3.-03,4. 4 4,-0. S'-0' 4.-0. 5.-0r 011 / ' 1 1 fim 1 1 $ SWITCH ROOM 1 I 104 I A42 1). EQUIP SLAB SEE STRUCT i 11) 0 $ /ii .. de & A ,\ .<'12.c)Ci XFIAR SEE ME 0 00 <'<>"SP\'\C° c'CLO Ps 24 _0. //./././///, 4 4 11 111 $ , 4nr, usTrA0 i / \y 1 / / LANDING R OM 1 A3I ,- t' / • / / / A /"/ .'1.../-/i 7/. / $ 5 103 0 REVISIONS / ri FIRE CONTRO :T. $ 0 No. Description Date 1=, 27 -9' 5, 0 Or 1 106 1 t., 4 A42 GTC SEE ELEC MTR SEE ELEC MCT SEE ELEC 0 6'-61/6' 6" 4 5'-55/8' • 10,-17. 4 CV HALL ..t CD z I 107 1 5 GENERATOR 1 5 ENCLOSURE U 0 0 1 108 V 4w/ r....... ; • 0 W 1:'_ . 1 TOILE RM. — — ii, 101 US INTERNET ;,- ri /02 ti SEE EEC 1 F) fr 9 OA g 0 SECURITY EQUIP 2 r4 ELEC AL ii ATS J-130X SEE ELEC i GENERATOR SEE ME / 1 r 6" 5 5 6,101 16" I 2 • 7-615/76' 111 111 MOP SEE ELEC 6444 XERXES AVE S SEE STRUCT FOR SLAB VEST. PA 1 1.11 LP SEE ELEC EDINA, MN 55423 1 101 AI g 5 • g 5 A PLANS 0 IF 1 ANNUNCIATOR SEE ELEC • 4. • . / X X -X t. .,.' N CITY OF ‘'I 0 Alk A4.1 EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 PROJECT NUMBER 22-041 DATE 1/18/23 DRAWN BY JTF, EJS CHECKED BY TLM E; -rig CO 1 kl_0 C FLOOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT nr 0 .... A2 • I ACRYLIC OR METAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA "9 — — — — — MEYER GROUP EFS WALL SYSTEM PREFINISHED CULTURED METAL FASCIA STONE _ ARCHITECTURE 306 W. Superior SI. 1022 Lakeshore Dr. Suite 1600 Ashland, WI 54806 Duluth, MN 55802 218.727.1330 715.292.6493 IN ww.meyergroupduluth.com 11:-.....__, ". -......,,..,•••••,;,...,w-A.,—=.....e-=,..., .•,= s“ ,,,, ED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/4r = 1.-0" ACRYLIC OR METAL EQUIN.ENT SCREENING PRE-FIMSHED 4) \ \, S' ) \ FASCIA T_Q. Plte *METAL N IA N AGO ROOFJOW1 W W } 2 REVISIONS 2 EJFS WALL SYSTEM No. Description Date 1=1 C•1 Cil (.;', ' - I 0 Z CULTURED STONE 5 J_ lb o II o I US INTERNET w ° °°° ,%',';'T-/9, 6444 XERXES AVE S EDINA, MN 55423 E . PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS N 14' = V-0" CITY OF EDINA '3 t ti JAN 19 2023 — PROJECT NUMBER 22-041 DATE 23 DRAWN BY 1/18/ JTF CHECKED BY TLM ,,, PLANNING DEF/ARIL4:1N I ZS 0 r.e A4 . 1 ACRYLIC OR METAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING PRE-FINISHED A3.1 METAL FASCIA MEYER ....,,„,_. - GROUP EIFS WALL ARCHITECTURE 306 W. Superior St. 1022 Lakeshore Dr. Suite 1600 Ashland, WI 54806 SYSTEM Duluth, MN 55802 218.727.1330 715.292.6493 www.meyergroupduluth.com CULTURED STONE 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/4" = I-0" 9'<<' C)\-1 9 05) ACRYLIC OR METAL A3.1 EQUIPMENT SCREENING N - GO To W PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA REVISIONS _ _ . _ __ , ., _. _ No. Description Date Ra?.J.gArpso N rli '' - 11 11 U N, 0 U H [I Z 6 _, EIFS WALL SYSTEM 0 • ... CHAIN LINK GATE ._, US INTERNET Cr ..- (1, CULTURED STONE 1 [11 6444 XERXES AVE S EDINA, MN 55423 E . Two:o - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CITY OF EDINA 9 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST PROJECT NUMBER 22-041 t 1W = 1.-0" o . PLANNING DEP 2,.I- i I JAN 1 9 2023 DATE 1/18/23 DRAWN BY JTF, EJS CHECKED BY TLM A4 • 2 GENERAL PROJECT NOTES CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 1. THE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLEMENTARY. READ THE DRAWINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND EXECUTE THE WORK. 3. THE WORK IS DEPENDENT ON SEVERAL DISCIPLINES. READ THE DRAWINGS BY CROSS-REFERENCING BETWEEN DISCIPLINES. 4. REPORT DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE FOR DIRECTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. SITE ACCESS & PROTECTION 1. STAGING AREA IS WITHIN THE CONTRACT LIMIT (OR "PROJECT LIMITS") LINE. STAGING AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE ACCESS ROUTES TO THE SITE. THE CONSTRUCTION (AND REMOVAL) OF TEMPORARY STAGING AREAS AND/OR ACCESS ROUTES SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE. 2. CONSTRUCTION RELATED VEHICLES REQUIRED FOR THE WORK EXITING AND/OR ENTERING THE SITE SHALL NOT DEPOSIT DIRT, MUD, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS THAT WOULD PRESENT A NUISANCE OR HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC TRAVELING ON RIGHT OF WAYS. PREVENTION AND CLEANING SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE. 3. NO WORK, EQUIPMENT OR STAGING IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE THE LIMIT LINES UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR HAS APPROVAL FROM AUTHORITIES. COORDINATION PERMITS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE. 4. THE DOCUMENTS DO NOT SPECIFY SAFETY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, METHODS OR SEQUENCING TO PROTECT PERSONS AND PROPERTY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPENSE TO DIRECT AND IMPLEMENT SAFETY OPERATIONS TO PROTECT PERSONS AND PROPERTY. QUALITY ASSURANCE 1. EXECUTE THE WORK AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL STATE, AND LOCAL STANDARDS, LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 2. ENSURE SUBCONTRACTORS, MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS HAVE THE LATEST CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THEIR SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR DELEGATED DESIGN DRAWINGS. 3. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTALS, INSPECTIONS AND NOTICE TO PROCEED. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 1. THE DOCUMENTS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTILITY SURVEY: • TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY SUNDE ENGINEERING (10830 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 (952) 881-3344) 2. SURVEYED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AS THEY ARE INFERRED BY SURFACE MARKINGS AND FEATURES AND AS SUCH MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. UTILITIES 1. THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF EXISTING UTILITIES (IF SHOWN) ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IDENTIFY, LOCATE AND PROTECT UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES TO REMAIN. 2. COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND/OR AGENCIES. CALL LOCAL '811' OR REQUEST LOCATES ONLINE NO LESS THAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING TO LOCATE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL REGULATIONS. 3. BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF DAMAGES WHICH OCCUR AS A RESULT OF A FAILURE TO ACCURATELY LOCATE AND/OR RETAIN UTILITIES TO REMAIN. LAYOUT 1. THE VERTICAL CONTROL FOR THE PROJECT IS: NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAV88) OR NATIONAL GEODETIC DATUM (NGDV29) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEATURES TO REMAIN THAT CONNECT TO NEW WORK, DIMENSIONAL CLEARANCES, SETBACKS AND OFFSETS AND VERTICAL DATUM. REPORT DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR DIRECTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. 3. VERIFY PREVIOUS UNDERLYING TRADEWORK CONFORMS TO THE DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH OVERLYING TRADEWORK. REPORT DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR DIRECTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. 4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN SURVEY CONTROL FOR LAYOUT OF THE WORKS AND AS-BUILT SURVEYS. 5. COORDINATE AND COLLATE SUBCONTRACTOR'S SURVEYS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND EVOLVING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE WORK. DISCREPANCY AND/OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING THE SITE WORK. DO NOT BEGIN WORK IN SUCH AFFECTED AREA UNTIL THE DISCREPANCY HAS BEEN RESOLVED. 6. ERECT AND INSTALL ALL WORK LEVEL, PLUMB, SQUARE, TRUE, STRAIGHT AND IN PROPER ALIGNMENT. 7. DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWINGS. USE DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND/OR SUPPLIED CAD DRAWING FILE AND. SURVEY INTERPOLATION. 8. DIMENSIONS NOTED "CLR" OR "CLEAR" MUST BE STRICTLY MAINTAINED ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF FINISHES. FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. ANGLES ARE 90 DEGREES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 10. CURVES FOR PAVING, BANDS, PATHS, EDGING AND HEADER BOARDS SHALL BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS WITHOUT ABRUPT CHANGES, OBVIOUS TANGENTS OR BENDS. 11. PITCH EVENLY BETWEEN SPOT GRADES AND CONTOUR LINES UNLESS GRADE BREAKS, RIDGELINES, SWALES ARE INDICATED OR OTHERWISE NOTED. PAVED AREAS SHALL PITCH AT A MINIMUM OF 1% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS. DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS NOT ALLOWING THIS TO OCCUR SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR RESOLUTIONS PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 12. PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS AND PAVING SHALL HAVE A CROSS PITCH LESS THAN 2% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS. 13. REQUEST A FIELD REVIEW BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THE LAYOUT OF ELEMENTS AS SHOWN. OBTAIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL OF LAYOUT BEFORE INSTALLING THE FOLLOWING: FIRST TYPICAL SITE LIGHTING FIXTURES, JUNCTION BOXES, TRANSFORMERS. • FIRST TYPICAL SITE UTILITY FIXTURES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BOXES, VAULTS, PULL BOXES, MAN HOLES, AIR RELEASE VALVES, VENTS, BFP, AND OTHER CIVIL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL PLUMBING, TELECOM, HEATING/COOLING, AND IRRIGATION STRUCTURES. • FIRST TYPICAL FORMWORK OF WALLS. • TREE LOCATIONS. STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS. OBTAIN APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE PLANTING TREES. FIRST TYPICAL CURVED EDGING AND CUTTING. FIRST TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINTS IN CONCRETE PAVING. WATERING 1. ALL PLANTED MATERIAL SHALL BE WATERED BY TEMPORARY MEANS UNTIL PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED. 2. TEMPORARY WATERING MEANS, METHODS, AND SCHEDULING SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY WATERING EQUIPMENT UPON PLANT ESTABLISHMENT WORK BY OTHERS 1. COOPERATE AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING CONCURRENTLY SO AS TO NOT VIOLATE EACH OTHER'S PERMITS AND TO AVOID DAMAGE TO EACH OTHER'S WORK. 2. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT AND MAINTAIN THEIR OWN WORK FOR THE DURATION OF THEIR CONTRACTS. CODE COMPLIANCE 1. WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS, CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 2. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE WORK AND APPLICABLE CODES. DO NOT WORK IN AN AFFECTED AREA UNTIL THE DISCREPANCY HAS BEEN RESOLVED. 3. VERIFY CODES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE NOTICE TO PROCEED AND STAY CURRENT WITH CODE CHANGES WHICH AFFECT THE WORK UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. 4. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN AND PAY FOR CONSTRUCTION RELATED PERMITS. CODES IN EFFECT 1. THE FOLLOWING CODES ARE APPLICABLE AND IN EFFECT: • 2020 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE 2. REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED AND PERMITTED DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CODE AUTHORITIES FOR REVIEW. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROCESSING TIME FOR EACH REVISION SUBMITTED FOR PLAN CHECK. COPYRIGHT AND REPRODUCTION 1. THE USE OF REPRODUCTIONS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR ELECTRONIC FILES AS SHOP DRAWING DOCUMENTS BY THE CONTRACTOR IS AT THEIR OWN RISK. THE DESIGN CONSULTANTS ASSUME NO LIABILITY AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF REPRODUCTIONS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR SHOP DRAWINGS AND/OR DELEGATED DESIGN DRAWINGS. 2. THE ENTIRE CONTRACT DOCUMENT PACKAGE HEREIN IS THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED PROPERTY OF THE OWNER AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE PRIOR EXPLICIT WRITTEN CONSENT. 3. THE USE OF DIGITAL DESIGN FILES SHALL REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO AGREE TO PRIME CONSULTANTS LICENSE CONDITIONS BEFORE USE. CONSTRUCTION LOADS, DAMAGES & REPAIRS 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SLOPE STABILITY AND DE-WATERING DURING THE WORKS UNLESS UNKNOWN CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING THE WORKS FROM CONSTRUCTION LOADS AND DAMAGES TO EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN, NEW STRUCTURES AND NEW PAVEMENTS DURING THE WORKS. 3. BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF DAMAGES WHICH OCCUR AS A RESULT OF A FAILURE TO MITIGATE CONSTRUCTION LOADS AND/OR PROTECT THE WORKS FROM CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPACTS. REPAIRS SHALL BE TO A NEW OR BETTER CONDITION COMPARED TO THE EXISTING CONDITION BEFORE DAMAGE, AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. CONFIRM ON-STRUCTURE UNIFORM AND POINT LOAD LIMITS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO IMPORTING AND HANDLING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS OVER VAULTS, AND/OR TUNNELS, INCLUDING UTILITY STRUCTURES, AND FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURES. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT 1. REMOVE FROM THE SITE EXCESS MATERIAL AND/OR DEBRIS. DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. EXCESS MATERIAL AND/OR DEBRIS TO ABLE TO BE RECYCLED OR REUSED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN A PERMITTED LANDFILL. ABBREVIATIONS APPROX APPROXIMATE AVG AVERAGE BLDG BUILDING BM BENCHMARKA BOS BOTTOM OF STAIR BOT BOTTOM C CHILLER CB CATCH BASIN CIP CAST-IN-PLACE CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLR CLEAR CLL CONTRACT LIMIT LINE CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CONC CONCRETE CTR CENTER T TRANSFORMER TAN TANGENT TBD TO BE DETERMINED TB-XX TEST BORING TD TRENCH DRAIN TEMP TEMPORARY THK THICKNESS THRUTHROUGH TO_ TOP OF _ TOC TOP OF CURB TOL TOLERANCE TOS TOP OF SLOPE TOW TOP OF WALL TR TRASH TS TOP OF STAIR TYP TYPICAL FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION UGND UNDERGROUND FF&E FURNITURE, FIXTURE, AND EQUIPMEI%- - uNIF UNIFORM FG FINISHED GRADE UP UTILITY POLE FOC FACE OF CURB UV ULTRAVIOLET FOW FACE OF WALL FV FIELD VERIFY GALV GALVANIZED GDR GUARDRAIL H HIGH HB HOSE BIBB HDPEHIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HH HAND HOLE HDR HANDRAIL HORIZ HORIZONTAL HT HEIGHT HV HIGH VOLTAGE ID INSIDE DIMENSION INV.EL INVERT ELEVATION KW KILOWATT LDPE LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE LED LIGHT EMITTING DIODE LF LINEAR FEET LPT LOW POINT LTD LIMITED LV LOW VOLTAGE LW LOW WATER MAX MAXIMUM MFR.REC MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS MH MANHOLE MID MIDDLE MIN MINIMUM N NORTH NA NOT APPLICABLE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NOM NOMINAL NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OH OVERHANG PB PULL BOX PC POINT OF CURVE PCC PRECAST CONCRETE PERF PERFORATED PERP PERPENDICULAR pH ACID/ALKALINE SCALE PH PHASE PI POINT OF INTERSECTION PKG PACKAGE PL PROPERTY LINE PLBG PLUMBING PRCST PRECAST PREFAB PREFABRICATE PROVPROVISIONAL PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PWR POWER DAT DATUM DEG DEGREE DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DIST DISTANCE DIV DIVISION DWG DRAWING • EAST EA EACH EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT EQ EQUAL EQSPEQUAL SPACING EQUIV EQUIVALENT EX EXISTING F FAHRENHEIT FC FOOTCANDLE VAR VARIES VERT VERTICAL VRFY VERIFY W WEST W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT WL WATERLINE WLD WELDED WT.EL WATER ELEVATION XFMRTRANSFORMER YR YEAR AT AND - / + DIMENSION TOLERANCE IJ ISOLATION JOINT HW HIGH WATER NP NORMAL POOL GB GRADE BREAK R RADIUS RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RECIRC RECIRCULATE RECPT RECEPTACLE REINF REINFORCE REQD REQUIRED REV REVISION RLG RAILING ROW RIGHT OF WAY S SOUTH SALV SALVAGE SEG SEGMENT SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR SPEC SPECIFICATION SQ SQUARE SSD SUBSOIL DRAIN SST STAINLESS STEEL STA STATION STD STANDARD SUCT SUCTION QTR QUARTER QTY QUANTITY CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMF F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 612.332.7522 CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby certify that Nis document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ant a duly licensed Landscape Architect under the LTna of the Slate of Minnesota TOM WHOLOCK Skin/dere Date Dale 01-18-2023 DF/ NOW I 22.248 Scats VT e 1,0° Drawn /Checked J./TW REVISION LANDSCAPE NOTES L001 01-18-2023 22-246 M indicated JVJTW Dale OF/ Project Scale Drawn/Checked D F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 612.332.7522 CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Nat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Archkect under the laws of the State of Minnesota TOM WHITLOCK Approver Signature Dale REVISION TREE PROTECTION PLAN L002 NEW BUILDING, SEE ARCH. FFE: 885.50' EXIST SIGN. TO REMAIN / I TREE PRESERVATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC NOTES 1. PROVIDE LMBING OF EXISTING TREES AS REDD FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS, CLEARANCE FOR PROJECT PATHWAYS, AND AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PRUNING & REMOVALS TO BE APPROVED BY LA PRIOR TO REMOVAL TREE PROTECTION 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE TREES SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS TO BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES PER DETAILS. 2. TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 3. NO WORK SHALL OCCUR IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EXTRA PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO TREES WHERE WORK IS DESIGNATED TO OCCUR WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE DRIPUNE OF TREES. REFER TO TREE PROTECTION DETAILS FOR TREE PROTECTION FENCE, TRUNK PROTECTION, AND PRUNING PRACTICES. 4.1. EXCAVATION WORK WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREES SHALL BE UMIFED TO HAND REMOVAL, DIRECTIONAL BORING. AND AIR KNIFE ONLY TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO ROOT SYSTEMS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR DIRECTIONAL BORING DEPTHS WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREES. 4.2. WHERE WORK IS TO OCCUR WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREES OR TREE PROTECTION ZONES, PROVIDE ROOT PRUNING. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION. 4.3. PROTECT TRUNK AND BRANCHES FROM DAMAGE WHERE WORK IS DESIGNATED TO OCCUR WITHIN THE DRIPUNE OF TREES. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PLACE TEMPORARY STRUCTURES OR STORE MATERIALS W TREE PROTECTION ZONES OR WITHIN THE DRIPUNE OF TREES. TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILE, AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHIN LIMITS OF PROTECTION. ROOT PROTECTION NOTES: TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 1/6" =1*-0" DRIPLINE VARIES AVOID DISTURBANCE TO CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. WORK WITHIN THIS ZONE WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEASURES OF PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TO BE RECOMMENDED BY ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST. TREE PROTECTION FENCING & SIGNAGE, REFER TO DETAILS NOTES: 1. WHERE WORK IS TO OCCUR WITHIN THE DRIPUNE OF A TREE, CONTRACTOR TO USE AIR EXCAVATOR, DIRECTIONAL BORING, ROOT PRUNING, AND PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES AS DETAILED. ROOT PRUNING TO BE PERFORMED BY ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST FAMILIAR WITH ROOT PRUNING PRACTICES. 2. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE DONE WITH A TRENCHER OR VIBRATORY PLOW TO A DEPTH OF 18% ROOTS OVER 1.5' DIA SHALL HAVE A CLEAN CUT MADE EVA CLEAN SAW ON SURFACE OF THE ROOT. DO NOT PAlfj CUT ROOT ENOS. 3. ROOT PRUNING SHALL TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING. STAKE LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION PRIOR TO TRENCHING. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED AS NECESSARY WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WHERE WORK IS TO OCCUR WITHIN DRIPINE OF TREE, PLACE 4' DEPTH ORGANIC WOOD MULCH AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. PLACE TREE PROTECTION WITHIN DRIPUNE WHEN FULL DRIPLINE PROTECTION IS NOT FEASIBLE DUE TO EXISTING PAVEMENT OR OTHER OBSTACLES. ROOT PRUNING TRENCH, PRUNE ON 6 TREE SIDE OF PROTECTION FENCE, 6. WIDE MAX x 18' TYP DEPTH. DIRECTIONAL BORING PERMITTED AT MIN 4' DEPTH UNDER CROWN DRIPLINE OF TREES. OPEN TRENCHING PERMITTED OUTSIDE DRIPUNE. /Thl ROOT PRUNING AND DIRECTIONAL BORING DETAIL 4. BACKFILL ROOT PRUNING TRENCHES WITH EXCAVATED SOIL AND MULCH. MARK LOCATIONS WITH STAKES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. SILT FENCE MAY BE INSTALLED IN TRENCH PRIOR TO BACKFILLING AS LONG AS TRENCH IS NOT OPEN LONGER THAN 48HRS WITHOUT WATERING. 5. DO NOT PERFORM ROOT PRUNING WHEN SOIL IS WET OR WHEN TOP 1. OR MORE OF SOIL IS FROZEN. 6. AVOID DISTURBANCE WITHIN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM TRUNK OUTWARD AND CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: • DBH <29.5' USE 1 FOOT RADIUS PER 1 INCH DBH, MIN 3' RADIUS • DBH > xr USE 1.5 FOOT RADIUS PER I INCH DBH (-4-O TREE PROTECTION SIGNAGE Art SPRUCE, 0 PROTECT 12' SPRUCE, TO PROTECT r / TREE PROTECTION FENCING, .-- PER DETAIL 2 / L002 TYP..- , Alr)i _ I / / , / I 711' PROPERTY LIMIT (VERIFY ON SURVEY 18- UNIDENTIFIED SPECIE-IA O PROTECT I I / TO PROTECT 5- CEDAR, 14' ELM,_.- - 4- - 1-- TO36" PROTECTMAPi-E *4i l, I ---,... TO PROTECTI / I" r:0 // e /VE I II 1. IN AREAS PRECAUTION 2. PROVIDE LOW-IMPACT 11 3. CONTRACTOR 1 I rr 4. TEMPORARY WHERE WORK OCCURS WITHIN DRIPUNE OF TREES AND IDENTIFIED AS ROOT PROTECTION ZONES ON PLANS, CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTRA TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO ROOTS DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES. PROTECTIVE 4. ORGANIC WOOD MULCH LAYER BENEATH AND AROUND CONSTRUCTION AREAS, CLEAN ROOT CUTTING BY ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST, AND EXCAVATION MEASURES. REFER TO PROJECT NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT STORE MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, OR PARK VEHICLES IN ROOT PROTECTION ZONES. ACCESS AND MOVEMENT ACROSS ROOT PROTECTION ZONES AND OVER PROTECTIVE MULCH LAYER TO FACILITATE THE WORK SHALL BE PERMITTED. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DURING THE DURATION OF THE REPAIR TO PROTECTIVE MULCH LAYER DISTURBED BY WORK. DRIPUNE VARIES TENSIONER: COATED WIRE OR NYLONE ROPE TO KEEP FENCE TAUGHT TREE PROTECTION FENCING: 451. ORANGE SNOW FENCING OR CONSTRUCTION GRADE CHAIN LINK. FASTEN TO POSTS WI H GALVANIZED WIRE TIES TREE PROTECTION SIGNAGE SPACED EVERY 50' ALONG FENCE. REFER TO SIGNAGE DETAIL POSTS: 7' Li-CHANNEL 1.12 LBS/FOOT STRENGTH PAINTED OR GALVANIZED 10 MAX. BETWEEN SUPPORTS PERSPECTIVE 1. 2. 3. TREE PROTECTION 1" =10'-0• 5-0' KEEP OUT TREE PRESERVATION AREA CALL asta-rorroorrirr TO REPORT VIOLATIONS PROHIBIDO ENTRAR ZONA DE PROTECION DEL ARBORI LLAMAR AL TEL WI-#!C PARA REPORTAR INFRACCIONES CITY OF JAN 1 INSTALL FENCE 6' MIN. OUTSIDE DRIPUNE OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN. II LAMINATED TREE PROTECTION SIGNAGE SPACED EVERY 50 ALONG FENCE PROVIDE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER D F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 612.332.7522 CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby certify that Nis document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and bat t am a duly licensed Landscape ArchTect under the laws of the State is/Minnesota TOM WHITLOCK Approver Signature Dale Dale 01-16-2023 DF/ Project • 22-246 Scab VT 1.-0. Drawn / Checked REVISION SITE PLAN L100 CONC. WALK0 PER DETAIL 2 / L508 1 - 7 11/17 6 / // I 1/ - - - , ro MIN ST - \ FENCING, PER DETAIL 8 / L500 • • • 0 / NEW BUILDING, SEE ARCH. I I EXIST SIGN. I TO REMAIN I I FFE: 885.50' 90 / —PROPERTY LIMIT (VERIFY ON SURVEY). • rm. 117 717 41Mbi MMO • • • E-- \ • BITUMINOUS SURFACING, SEE CIVIL. • GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCH.. FFE: 884.001 X • • • • • 1'M/7 ft\ii.7.F1, 0 Rift C) 1/8" = 1.-0" SITE PLAN CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 OLPARTMENT F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 812.332.7522 ..••1. /116 ... iiiiIIITIIIP111111111111111111S111111111111111111111,1111111111/:11!!!!!!!!!!EESIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiMMEMMOSAMMR ---- n 1101 110I NI:15 /OA 1101 . PROPERTY L MIT ERIFY ON SURVEY„. 11111111111111111111111111111111111 METAL EDGER 137.0 LF 11119111 1 - TI-B .11•• • • Vila Alpp 90111111111 011111.111 A OE NIMI/1141" !!!! VO‘P4011/11/1111111 it; .1.•,:;•i 441111,iii11011 /AAR ll li011111 . Ir!!!!' Iii '11121111111 4 4. . 1111111E11M! IA 1110111113 Ilei, vimira ttiII~~l pili „Air %cranium HVALIIN!! fi;h.311111 Irlir 4 . 1111:0 .--• *A. . akotttit, •• 16,4, V4111, aittkk&\CI- MUM ..44141110 "WSATIF . ... .... 'MEP 4111M011111 • 11 1 - TI-B - - * • 1,856`st-1-§2 • - METAL . *EDGER -95.5' 1 - TI-B miS irg 1111111111111111111111111111::1:;: n 7::::1111111111101,M111111q11- /6-WAWA._ BITUMINOUS SURFACING, SEE CIVIL NEW BUILDING, SEE ARCH. FFE: 885.50' 15 -TT -7,4176070.14114ik QN 6 - QN V GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCH. FFE: 884.00' PLANT SCHEDULE OOZES CCOE SOTAACA./C041..114./ KEE.CCAVESI WIATN/FALL 'FETA/ SUVA SVAS SOS I V., OATES OTT RBO10.21 UWAVAMOMMAJADANW.MMMTIA SVCS, WEIMAXWOONIAAR,O.PADIAM.OW MOMS CODE nmummmulauvaamomwmpuo. SOTA/C../COIACNIALIE SVGA EVE KOES IPAYAO OTY RAMO MOIMMAYVIVALMUNMOCIW.EQW.KMMOOMMMTV IS 0 COTCPEASTERALVEEISUILITOASELI/IXIIMOBI COT:FEASTER MARTI% OCCATEOCOI FUR WES. 0 •FAENIAA OAF TIAJES 1/0.70L•OCK 'MATCH TVA 00TOW.A./C<A1COINAIL ruprt.tor..vreew.ui MITES IVES. YMCAS IS CITY PAY406 0 .AWAMMUMAIMOMUMRAUMMTIARMMITAMOMMM90414 CENT Wet. 0 WYMMAIIMMAMINAWKWM 0 SCALOO10.ASCOEYRIN/LITTLEKIESTENI IVEY. OISOLOOCOANS VICE 001/104.1001•11.11AW WAE nOTES SIM.02 CITY R01/03 FES VONFIESOA ILIAD/CO 3StEEF . .•.'.•. 112 PAIMMAMWORTXMAffRAMAADO CITY OF EDINA TREE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED TREES: 13 PROVIDED TREES: 15 (8 NEW, 7 EXISTING) REQUIRED TREES = PROPERTY PERIMETER (4897/ 40 TREE TYPE REQUIRED PROVIDED ORNAMENTAL 1 7 NEW 2.5" CALIPER 4 5 NEW 3.5" CALIPER 4 1 NEW 4.5" CALIPER 3 1 EXISTING, 3 NEW 5.5" CALIPER 3 5 EXISTING PLANTING NOTES: 1. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED PER DETAIL 1 / L500 2. SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED PER DETAIL 4 / L500 3. PERENNIALS SHALL BE PLANTED PER DETAIL 3 / L500 4. USE AIR EXCAVATION TO LOOSEN SOIL AND PLANT BELOW DRIPLINE OF MAPLE. FIELD ADJ. WILL BE REQ'D. HAND PLANTING ONLY TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE. 5. PLANT MATERIAL, MULCH, SOILS, AND COMPOST SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR JUMPING WORMS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF MATERIALS ON SITE. INSPECTION SHALL BE PERFORMED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NOTIFY LA MINIMUM OF 48 HRS PRIOR TO MATERIAL ARRIVAL. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. JUMPING WORMS ARE AN UNCLASSIFIED INVASIVE SPECIES IN MINNESOTA AND PROVIDE A THREAT TO NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS. CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET N 4//1-(1, ERIFYON SURVey Dale DF/ Prciect Scale Dawn / Checked REVISION N (Th PLANTING PLAN 1/8” = 1.-0" PLANTING PLAN CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 L101 F-LANNING DEPARTiviLNI 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby corlify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I em a duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota TOM WHITLOCK Approver Signature Date 01.182023 22.246 As indicated 6011W F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 612.332.7522 CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Landscape Archaect under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota TOM WHRLOCK Approver Signature Date Date 01-18-2023 OF/ PrNect a 22-248 Seale As indicated Drawn/ Checked JV/TW REVISION SITE DETAILS L500 GRID SPACING LAYOUT PLAN TRVNGULAR SPACING LAYOUT PLAN (71O TREE PLANTING 3/4" = 1'-0" rk--) PLANT SPACING 3/4" =1'-0" NOTE: REFER TO PLANTING SCHEDULE PLANT SPACING. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOIL PREPARATION. EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (I," DIA. OR LARGER) EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION. r HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. OR GREATER X 36" MISTAKE IN PLACE. PER SPEC PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPED 36" RADIUS =FRE =-1 Ell1=111111E111111=1 UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL 4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK -1=11 P3A-1 \ --941•11 -TIMM ' knal )03111 MN 'W MEM .1,11. 11.1 NTSMECe' h Air =u lAtVingrAPM ,t '\kt 6' DIAMETER MULCH RING EDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS AND SOIL LOOSENED PLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALS SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 3 MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEM APPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE 3. MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED EDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN PLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBS SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ri) METAL EDGER OMEGA ARCHITECTURAL FENCE SYSTEM, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. 6" X 6. BASE PLATE C-FLANG3GV 12" DIA SONOTUBE FOOTING. EDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN PREPARED PLANTING SOIL PER SPEC SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVING OPERENNIAL PLANTING 1" = V-0" PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED '10 OA. SPACING ArAlgriffiragralk WAWA, pes aYrc q1 PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE SEG OSHRUB PLANTING \„,._y 3/4" =1'-0" EO. 112 PLANT SPACING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANTING SCHEDULE 8 PLAN 1/2 PLANT SPACING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANTING SCHEDULE 8 PLAN 40 C) /2" = 1'-0" FENCING PLANTED AREA 3/16. METAL EDGER wrTH STAKE SEEDED AREA HOLD FINISHED GRADE 1/2" BELOW EDGER. EQUALLY SPACED SEGMENTS- MAX 7-6T OZ. SPACING 12. MIN MASTIC SEALANT, PER SPECIFICATIONS; COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVING. WIDTH TO DEPTH RATIO OF MASTIC TO BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CLOSED CELL FOAM BACKER ROD 4' CONCRETE WALK. MIX PER SPEC. 0,6" D-6" -Cf. 6' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE TYPICAL EDGE, FORM AT 90 DEGREES TO APPEAR SIM. TO CONTROL JOINT EDGE PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT FLIER PER SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING SUBGRADE, COMPACTED. SEE CML TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT- ENLARGED EXPANSION JOINT TO OCCUR 20.0.C. MAX AND AT CONSTRUCT/ON JOINTS, RAMPS, WALLS. AND OTHER VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATIONS CITY OF EDINA 023 'LANNjINACN-; 1 1)2 ivibN I DEPTH OF CUT TO BE 1/4 THE DEPTH OF SLAB; MAKE ALL SAW CUTS WITHIN 12 HR. OF CONCRETE POUR 1/4T THICK CUT TYPICAL SAWCUT CONTROL JOINT O CONCRETE JOINT WORK 1/2" = 1 Es#019. vt.Tts,w.Thamrsarirs•vio•vhamis..2.0,,A.11 Eir2 a Vara►ingglinitaigaPrAit4,1 tri; Lalar MAIL ITagral42 11-11 11=11=11=11=IL=.11= — .11.—.1 —IL IL— .fi—.0=111L=IL—n= — — =T 11-11.-11 II—II—II-11—n— —11=11 —11=11=11.= =11= F=11=11=11 11=IL=1102= = 1 11..Terti-r.E._--ATILB141 -,11=11=11=11=11-- OCONCRETE WALK 3/4" = 10" D F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 612.332.7522 CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly *tensed Landscape Archked under the laws of the State of Minnesota TOM WHITLOCK Approver Signature Date Date 01-18-2023 DE/ Project* 22-246 Scale As irvicated Drawn/Checked Jv / TW REVISION SITE PERSPECTIVES L501 OPERSPECTIVE 1 - LOOKING WEST NOT TO SCALE (5) PERSPECTIVE 2 - LOOKING NORTH NOT TO SCALE r-f-4-O PERSPECTIVE 3 - LOOKING SOUTH slly NOT TO SCALE VIFW KEY 0 0 6=r-- 0 ILO -L—(5 O. '\ `Y 1 CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 PLANNING nc7r, IMENT PARKING LOT EXIST. SIGN OW FESCUE • SHADE TREE • :J 713-EFITITI -STREET TREES....- ' NEW BUILDING SEE ARCH. NAMEill'AL RO dik GENERATOR ENCLOSURE SEE ARCH. rl XERXES AVE EXIST. DRIVE 0 ILLUSTRATED PLAN 1/8" = 1.-0" F/ DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 401 North 2nd Avenue, Suite 410 Minneapolis, MN 55401 p: 612.332.7522 CITY OF EDINA SUBMISSION US INTERNET 6444 XERXES AVE, EDINA, MN I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct stipends& and that I am a dub licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota TOM VVHITLOCK Apployer Signature Date Dale 01-18-2023 DF/ Proiect • 22-246 Scale 1/6'= ILO" Drawn / Checked BS / TW REVISION ILLUSTRATED PLAN L502 CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 r—I 0 N N (i) >s a) X Lc) PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING BUILDING MATERIAL SAMPLE BOARD 1/18/23 CULTURED STONE - CORONADO BELGIAN CASTLE BROOKSIDE EIFS BASE COLOR STUCCO FINISH MECHANICAL SCREEN (ROOFTOP) PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME MEYER GROUP ARCHITECTURE CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 I 'LANNING DEPARTMENT 1022 / / / I / i MOS .727 76 ,, L-1;;;ER AVI:"_-,^f b'E- ,L,'DDITi?,"si ,-- Ev.ock 2 , 26172 I W ( ._ .21111! .5.89'45'524E O / \ -FiNcE1 tits 0.5 FL itg. \ 6.;,4;sou111 OF.PROFERTY UNE \ ° \ 20. , ITEM 14 .., s ITEM 11 111 s--;.-AREA DESCRIBEDIN QUIT am, s'..,-SAMTARY SERER EASEMENT 2 / DEED DOC. NO. 4471805 / PER 00CM. 546512 _g_± _ _ ?4------.- _ _ _ 1,2_Z' - ,, _ / -., ' _ !, - ,,. ,..112612 1210011 SU: / ;/' 725 F). 886.32 FT.; / /// /I L. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FOR: U.S. Internet ( 2214/ Al OMER: JOSEPH & JANE COSTA F ADDRESS: 6438 XERXES AVE RID.: 29-028-24-24-0119 ZOIIG: R2 26616 stfr TR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 2, Xerxes Avenue Addition. Hennepin County, Minneaota. (Torre. Property - Certificate of Title No. 1217133) ases21 ass- 1.72 132.82 TOP FENCE UES ET.-' SOUTH OF PROPERTY UNE 71 1612.614 sev.802(5) eaLs00 s 12' PCP GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: 1. The orientation of thls bearing syatem is bosed on the Hennepin County coordinate grid (NAD 83-2011 Adj.). 2. The legal description ond easement information ueed in the preparation of this survey is based on the Commitment for Title Insuronce prepared by First Americon Title !neuron. C.npany. Commitment No. NCS-1136360-MPLS dated June 12. 2022. 3. The ongulor rotation measured clockwise from record bearings depicted on the plat of XERXES AVENUE ADDITION to this aurvey Is 00 degrees 04 minutes 40 s.onds. 4. The surveyed property hos direct access to Xerxes Avenue South, a public right of way. 5. The contours depicted hereon are per elevation data collected whee conducting the fieldwork. The contour interval is 1 foot. SITE BENCHMARK: Top nut of hydrant In Northeast corner of surveyed property Devotion = 886.45 feet. (City of Edina Oatum) 6. The total area of the property deecnbed hereon Is 15,113 square feet or 0.34695 acres. 7. The property described hereon lie, within Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outeide the 0.2X annual chance fl.dploin) per Federal Insurance Rate Mop No. 27053C 0364 F, dated November 4, 2016. 8. Existing utilities, services and underground structures shown hereon were located either physically, from existing records made available to Lie, by resident testimony. or by locations provided by Gopher State One Call, per Ticket No. 223390820. However. lacking excavation, the exact lo.tion of undergr.nd features connot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where oddiUonol or more detoled information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Other LIM., and services may be present and verification and locotion of all utilities and services should be obtained from the owners of the respective utilitiee prior to any design, planning or excavation. The utility mopping completed as port of this survey meets the specifications of Quality Level C In accordance with Cl/ASCE 38-02 'Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." 9. As of the date of U. survey the property described hereon contains a total of 9 standard parking sp.es. 10. No zoning report or letter was r.eiv.. The zoning closellications depicted hereon ore bosed on informal. shown on the City of Edina Zoning Mop https://edinagis.maps.arcgis.corn/apps/weboppviewer/Indeohtmlfidwile8c334180d0.39ba8741(20e55afe5 Ws. ITEM 12 Asses -easess,,-PUBUC 1111UTY EASEMENT i PER DOC. NO. 4471806 11 22.10 -e. as ▪ 7 1---482.07 41M22 /-'"41s, s sss, 158,/, 'awe __ / _ sae) ..1_____, r ..F. 22442- -aloe '66114 met / / ///////,/ / / / /I_ LI, ' HEST UNE OF THE RES1RICRON ig / -tir, UNE OF-Th Or., /i, RECITED IN 00C. NO. 1299590 / , ME RESIRICRON \ RECIIED IN 00C. , NO. 1299590 _ LEGEND: 7-5 SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT STOP BOX SPRINKLER BOX MR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC AIETE_R UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE GAS METER SIGN PARKING COUNT SPOT ELEVATION EXISfiNG CONTOUR LINE T 75 -(""" 84- \"-PM FIELD MARKINGS / 1r %WC 122.50 /, lr VCT (PER PLAN) / :p- / t-- 57'50 -I- (-1611..1.13 „„. sese(s) asse00 16 PVC s ITEM fO e-SARY SERER EASEMENT 1 I PER I 0C. NO. 1299590 1379.1T" 21.21121 211.64.100 666.6661 161.2645(2) 61±&16). TREE CHAJN UNK FENCE HAIM RAIL SANITARY SEVIER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND GAS 6444 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH P.1.D.: 29-028-24-24-0120 ZONING: POD-1 662.2 6-1 V L_I EXIS11NG BUILDING 1 SR3RY BRICK BUILDING AREA: 2,084 soft ITEM9 & UIIUTY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF )(IMES AVENUE ADDIIION (/) - C) T.) C) 74227 (1) (%i (1) <C C) 41 ?1:4; cgA2 oil owN 53.. E LOT BFR1MINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE CITY OF EDINA .0\ kOCK / 2 _5 2622 JAN 1 9 7023 74 ,-BUXDING Waif: 15.0 FT • FFE: 886.78 FT.; _ .611214" GOPHER STATE ONE CALL NOTE: List of utilities noUfied per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 223390820. CITY OF EDINA ELECTRIC CITY OF EOM FIBER OPTIC CITY OF RICHFIELD CENTURYUNK - CTLOL HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBUC WORKS MCI METROPOLITAN COUNC1L(MCES) AT&T TRANSMISSION COMCAST ClTY OF EDINA WATER OTT OF EDINA SANITARY SEWER CITY OF EDINA STORM SEWER CENTERPOINT ENERGY XCEL ENERGY ra mum 4- 01P (PER PLAN) A r-‘17‘17-Int, I I SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: Sub}sct to utility and drainage easements as shown on plot Xerxes Avenue Addition, r.orded October 2, 1956, as Document No. 511402, shown os a recital on the Certificate of Title. ITEM 9. 40; .24 Said drainage ond easement affects the .rveyed property and is depicted hereon. 22.70 69285466117 10. Subject to a perpetual easement for sanitary sewer purpose. over port of obove land as shown in Document No. 1299590, shown as a recital on the Certificate of Title. 20 30 Said sanitary sewer easement affects the surveyed property and Is depicted hereon. The existing bailing Is permitted to be within said easement. Said eosement also contains a douse that restricts surfoce disturbance or entry Into the port of the easement lying 57.5 feet east of the west line of Lot 8 and 122.5 feet east of the west line of Lot 8. '1 ..." C.1 I • 2,9.-0282TP,V4P5av 4-4 I ,r4r-•..c \ • <-:..,-4.,j,/".... . ----- '4..t- - CW/40: ti,21-4S 4 I 626114 0 10 SCALE IN FEET ITEM 11. Easem.t for Sanitary Sewer purposes, together with any incidental rights, in favor of Wage of Edina, a Minnesota corporation, os contoined in the Quitclaim Deed, dated October 30, 1957, recorded Decernber 5, 1957, as Document No. 546512. • FOUND IRON MONUMENT 424 Said sanitary sewer easement affects the surveyed property and depicted hereon. KI ITDA 12. Easement for public utility purposes, together with ony incidental rights, In favor of City of Edina, a Minneeota municipal corporation, as contained in the Gront of Permanent Easement, dated January 4, 2008, recorded February 22, 2008, as Document No. 4471806. 62116022121 Said public utlity easement affects the surveyed property and is depicted hereon. ITEM 14. The following document. ore memorials and/or recitole on the certificate of title: a) Quit Claim Deed dated January 29, 2008, recorded February 22. 2008, as Document No. 4471805. Said quit deka deed affects the surveyed property. The area described in said quit claim deed is depicted hereon. 5510.52177 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report eras prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the la. of the State of Minnesota. 12 Date of survey: December 20. 2022. Dote of signature: De.mber 21. 2022. Eric A. Roeser Minnesota License No. 47478 eroeserOefneurvey.com VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 4' FIELDWORK CHIEF: FIELD BOOK PAGE PROPERTY ADDRESS: SURVEY FOR: REVISIONS 475 Old Highway 8 NW, Suite 200 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 WWW.EfNSURVEY.COM Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. COPYRIGHT 0 2022 By EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. DESCRIPTION EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY NO. DATE AV 2022/06/11 REVISED PER COMMENTS DRAWN BY: DL. DAV 6444 Xerxes Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55423 U.S. Internet 2022/12/16 ADDED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 2 DRAWING NAME: 40755 TOPO.dwg CHECKED BY: EAR JOB NO. 40755 land surveyors since 1872 FILE NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 Y) ARCH C ITECT 1)URE RESPECTING OUR CLIENTS RESPECTING OUR ENVIRONMENT DULUTH OFFICE 1600 Alworth Building 306 We Super;ar Street Duluth, MN 55602 P (218) 727- 1330 I F (218) 727-1338 ASHLAND OFFICE 1022 Lakesiltyru Drive A;hland, WIscarivrt 54306 P (7151 292,6493 Project: 22-041 US Internet — Internet Utility Building Address: 6444 Xerxes Avenue South, Edina, MN 55423 Date: January 18, 2023 Conditional Use Permit — Project Description Pursuant to Sec. 36-1273.b - Utility buildings and structures, Other utility buildings and structures, US Internet Corp. is constructing an Internet Utility Building. The principal structure will be a new building constructed of concrete masonry block and steel joists with a low slope (flat) roof. The building will be finished with EIFS and Cultured Stone veneer masonry. The building will meet the minimum height requirements. The building will not meet the minimum transparency requirements due to the security needs for this type of utility building, but the EIFS will be composed in a manner that suggests window frames. All front, side, and rear yard setbacks will be adhered to. The building will overlap an existing sanitary sewer easement. US Internet Corp. and Meyer Group Architecture have been in communication with the City of Edina's Engineering Department and will address the sanitary sewer in whatever manner they prescribe. US Internet Corp. intends to abide by all other site and landscaping requirements. The result is intended to be a new building that matches the character of the neighborhood and POD-1 District. CITY OF EDINA JAN 1 9 2023 DE.PARTM;ENT City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 1 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire The City of Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the community. To help achieve these goals, developers seeking City approval must complete this form as part of their their zoning application. Upon receipt of this form, please email Sustainability Division lead, Grace Hancock, GHancock@edinamn.gov, to set up a time to walk through the form and discuss sustainable building strategies. Please email the completed form to Cary Teague, CTeague@edinamn.gov, and copy Grace Hancock. Development Address: Developmer Applicant Name: Date: Is the development seeking a PUD or City financing? See Sustainable Buildings Policy if so Topics Answers Yes or No Brief Description Sustainable Design & Energy Consumption Will you utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance or Energy Efficient Buildings, and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Yes/Yes Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals? No Will the building be LEED certified? No Will all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified? N/A Will water heaters be electric or natural gas? Electric Tankless on demand system Will building heat be powered by electricity or natural gas? Electric Will different strategies to conserve energy (beyond those required by code) be included? If so, please describe No Will there be renewable energy such as solar or wind be generated on site? No Will the project include a geothermal system? No Will the completed project subscribe to a community solar program or other renewable energy program? No Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? No Comments: Managing Storm Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? N/A 39.98% Existing vs. 44.62% Proposed What new surfaces will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) N/A Building, sidewalks, driveways and associated parking Will a green roof be included on the new structure to assist in storm water retention? No City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 2 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Will rain gardens or similar features be included on site to filter and retain the storm water? No Comments: Net decrease in impervious area from existing to proposed conditions Landscaping Features to Manage Air Quality and Heat Island Effect Will existing healthy trees be protected and saved? Yes One tree will be removed and replaced, all others will be saved. What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? N/A 18% Existing vs. 30% Proposed Will you meet the current tree preservation and planting ordinance? Yes 13 trees are required and 15 will be included Will shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code? Yes 3 Tilia americana ‘Boulevard’ trees are included along Xerxes Avenue Will native plantings be used in the landscaping? Yes Will landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties? Yes Will future owners and managers be trained in methods to avoid harmful chemicals being used on landscaping? Yes Comments: Managing Construction Waste Will demolition of existing structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? No / No Will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse? Example, timber, steel, asphalt, cabinets, etc. Yes Are scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled? Yes Are workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use? Yes Comments: Managing Operational Waste Will a recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? N/A Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? N/A Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices? N/A Comments: City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 3 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Managing Water Consumption Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? No Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding conservation of water? No Will outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? N/A Comments: Sustainable Transportation Features Is the site accessible by public transit within ½ mile? Yes Are site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines. No If there is no public transit within ½ mile, is the project providing features to help bridge the distance to allow flexibility to use public transit? No Is bike parking available near the main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? N/A Is bike parking and a shower facility provided for employees? N/A Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners, guests or customers to use? N/A Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? N/A Updated June 2022 Conditional Use Permit & Variances –6444 Xerxes Avenue (U.S. Internet) EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 Site 4/05/12 6 Site 4/05/12 7 4/05/12 8 4/05/12 9 4/05/12 10 4/05/12 11 EdinaMN.gov 12 4/05/12 13 Request Requires: EdinaMN.gov 14 •Conditional Use Permit & Variance Section 36-579 of the zoning ordinance requires buildings in the POD District to meet the following standards: •All new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. •All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). •Ground level first floors must have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 20 feet. EdinaMN.gov 15 City Standard Proposed Front –Xerxes AvenueSide Yard –NorthSide Yard –SouthRear –West 35 feet 20 feet 20 feet20 feet 35 feet20 feet20 feet 30+ feet Over-story Trees 12 trees required (number is based on the perimeter of the site) 24 trees existing and proposed on the site 4/05/12 16 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety, or welfare. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Conditional Use Permit Criteria Primary Issue EdinaMN.gov 17 • Is the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) criteria met and the variance reasonable for the site? Yes, the CUP criteria is met, and the variances are reasonable for the following reasons: 1. As demonstrated on pages 2-3 of this report, the findings for a conditional use permit would be met. 2. The proposal meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance standards except for the building material. 3. The variances are reasonable given the use of the structure as a utility building and the need for security. The purpose of the 75% transparency requirement is to make commercial uses more inviting to the public. This is not a site that will generate traffic from the public. The first eight feet of the 20-foot building will be made of stone. 4/05/12 18 4. The plan includes landscaping and trees to exceed City Code, and partially screen the building. 5. A pedestrian sidewalk would be added along the north lot line for residents to the west and north access to the commercial area to the east and south. 6. The proposal would improve and expand internet serve to Edina residents. Better Together Edina EdinaMN.gov 19 Staff & Planning Commission Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 20 City Council Recommended Action Close the public hearing at noon on March 27, 2023 and continue action to April 4, 2023. EdinaMN.gov 21 Edina City Council Public Hearing March 21, 2023 US Internet 2Confidential •US Internet is a fiber internet service provider. •Established in 1995 •Privately owned and operated. Headquartered in Minnetonka •Currently provides residential internet service in portions of Minneapolis, St Louis Park, Minnetonka and Northeast Edina •Numerous Edina residents have expressed interest for service US Internet’s Coverage Map 3Confidential Construction Process 4Confidential FIBER TO THE PREMISE •Conduit deployed underground on both sides of the street in the Right of Way •Dedicated conduit to each building subscribing In Neighborhood Central Office (Switching Station) 5Confidential Central office constructed at 3651 Snelling Avenue South •Conduit/fiber in neighborhood comes back to the central office To service central and southern Edina, a central office is required 6Confidential •Property acquired at 6444 Xerxes Avenue South •USI would construct a 1,900 square foot facility •USI has met the conditions of Section 36-1273 Utility Buildings and Structure Perspective 1 –Looking West 7Confidential Perspective 2 –Looking North 8Confidential Perspective 3 –Looking South 9Confidential Overhead View 10Confidential USI is requesting; - 11Confidential •A conditional use permit be granted •A variance to construct the facility with no windows due to security concerns •Use of materials (cultured stone) to maintain consistency with projected projects 12 Appendix Confidential Current Structure at 6444 Xerxes 13Confidential Benefits of a Fiber Network to a City 14Confidential •Helps make a more “attractive” city •Promotes Economic Development –High speed internet spurs economic growth especially in the technology sector •Increases property values •Increases competition More than 1,100 cities have made requests to Google for a fiber network while they have entered 6 cities •Cities not selected by Google are in some cases building themselves or partnering with others •Supports the increase of “work and learn” from home How is USI different than other Providers? 15Confidential •Network Design •Dedicated fiber to each building passed •“Future proof” Construction •No sharing bandwidth with the neighbors •Fastest speeds •Best in class Customer Service •Google star rating of 4.6 •Best Value Pricing •No Contracts •Belief and adherence in Net Neutrality •Locally owned and operated •Founders and the management team born and raised in the Twin Cities •Headquarters in Minnetonka Section 36-1273 Utility Buildings and Structures 16Confidential •(a) Utility buildings and structures owned by the city.Utility buildings and structures owned by the city and used for rendering service to all or any part of the city (but excluding warehouses, maintenance buildings and storage yards) shall be a permitted principal or accessory use in all districts. •(b) Other utility buildings and structures.Utility buildings and structures owned by private utility companies or governmental units other than the city, and used for rendering service to all or any part of the city (but excluding warehouses, maintenance buildings and storage yards) shall be a conditional use in all districts and shall only be constructed pursuant to a conditional use permit granted in accordance with article V of this chapter. Conditions to be met; (1) Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; (2) Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; (3) Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; (4) Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; (5) Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located, as imposed by this chapter; and (6) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. US Internet Believes in Net Neutrality 17 •We provide open networks •We do not block or filter content •We do not provide preferential network treatment •We do not throttle web traffic •We do not have data caps or overage charges •We do not interfere with web traffic •Reasonable network practices that are neither anticompetitive nor prejudicial Our network is being built to handle increased internet usage and demands so we can continue to promote net neutrality Confidential 18 Thank You! Confidential Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments 6444 Xerxes Ave. S. Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 6444 Xerxes Ave. S. Conditional Use Permit VISITORS 94 CONTRIBUTORS 6 RESPONSES 6 0 Registered 0 Unverified 6 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 6 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 14, 2023 05:50:43 am Last Seen:Feb 14, 2023 05:50:43 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Al Cobb Q2.Address 6309 York Ane. #102 Q3.Comment I would rather see a warehouse type building in a warehouse district. I would vote no for the variance. Thank you for allowing community input. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 15, 2023 12:58:47 pm Last Seen:Feb 15, 2023 12:58:47 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Anne Peterson Q2.Address 6450 York Ave So #208 Edina Q3.Comment My concerns are about height of building? Added traffic and noise? I see a separate generator building on back, will that add noise? Is this the type of building that would add extra traffic 24 hours a day? If there can’t be windows because of security does this building bring added danger to neighbors? Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 18, 2023 18:14:07 pm Last Seen:Feb 18, 2023 18:14:07 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Patrick McDougle Q2.Address 3250 W. 66th St. #637 Q3.Comment I live on the same block as this proposed structure and there are a few things that it'd be great to incorporate if there are changes / conditions for this site. 1.) If there's anything that can be done with the placement of this building such that continuing 65th street through to Xerxes would be possible in the future, that'd be great. 2.) The sidewalk is a nice touch, but what does it connect to to the West? There's nothing there. Have the adjacent property owners weighed in on if they would be amenable to continuing this through to York Avenue? 3.) Please make sure that noise mitigation is part of the plan for this site. Often times utility buildings can emit whirring or humming that is a public health hazard (long-term hearing damage) and a disturbance to peace. 4.) Does this building need to be so tall? Next to the duplex to the north and the insurance office to the south, this building will feel kinda imposing (especially without the transparency as requested) Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 26, 2023 11:48:43 am Last Seen:Feb 26, 2023 11:48:43 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Angie McMillan Q2.Address 2808 w. 71 1/2 St, Richfield Q3.Comment A building with ZERO windows. I think not! Why is this even being considered? If you need a building with privacy, tint the damn windows! Sorry, but this sounds very suspicious to have a building with no windows. What would be going on inside that building? Against! This is too close to a public school to have this kind of “privacy” and put kids potentially in danger! Windows are a must! Period! Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 26, 2023 18:05:15 pm Last Seen:Feb 26, 2023 18:05:15 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Joseph Wenzel Q2.Address 6617 Thomas Ave S, Richfield MN Q3.Comment I support the variance. US internet provides an essential service that can help the lives of many local residents. Without the variance they would have to install superficial windows that would needlessly increase the cost of the structure. Being a technology center security is of the utmost importance. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 27, 2023 14:52:34 pm Last Seen:Feb 27, 2023 14:52:34 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name John Hamilton Q2.Address 6125 Beard Ave S Q3.Comment Not a very handsome building, and clearly not intended to be one. Once this creature is built, it will freeze the site for many years as an unfortunate utility building orphaned in the middle of Xerxes. There are hundreds of existing office buildings that have excess floor space all over Edina that would happily accept a long term tenant. I see no reason to approve it and certainly no reason to allow a variance. If the Owners do not respect the community any more than they have illustrated, then the feelings are reciprocal. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-22 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES FOR US INTERNET AT 6444 XERXES AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 US Internet (USI) Corp. is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to construct a 1,900 square foot, 20-foot-tall utility building at 6444 Xerxes Avenue. The Variance requested is to construct a building with no windows due to security concerns. 1.02 US Internet originally requested a variance to build the front facing portions of the building (north and east) with cultured stone and EIFS instead of brick or stone entirely. However, on March 28, 2023, the applicant submitted a new building plan with an all-brick finish facing the north and east to meet City Code. 1.03 The existing structure would be removed from the site and the new building constructed. The facility would provide improved internet services to Edina residents. USI currently serves the north/northeastern portions of Edina. The building on Xerxes would cover central and southern Edina. There would be one employee on the site providing service for customers. Customers do not travel to the site for service. 1.04 A Conditional Use Permit is required for the private utility building. 1.05 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 8, Block 2, Xerxes Avenue Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota 1.06 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. A Conditional Use Permit. 2. Variance to Section 36-579 to construct a building with no windows due to security concerns. 1.07 On March 15, 2023, a Planning Commission recommended for approval failed. Vote: 4 ayes, 4 nays. 1.08 On March 21, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit and Variances. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-22 Page 2 1. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit conditions per Chapter 36 Sec. 36-305 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements except for building transparency requirement that new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. 3. The variances are reasonable given the use of the structure as a utility building and the need for security. The purpose of the 75% transparency requirement is to make commercial uses more inviting to the public. This is not a site that will generate traffic from the public. 4. The proposal would improve and expand internet serve to Edina residents. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit and Variance for building transparency for US Internet at 6444 Xerxes Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 3.01 Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Site plans date stamped January 19, 2023. Grading and drainage plan date stamped January 19, 2023. Landscaping plan date stamped January 19, 2023. Building renderings date stamped March 28, 2023. 2. A grading permit is required for the improvements. 3. A lighting plan must be submitted with the grading plan and must meet all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 5. Remove and replace the sidewalk along Xerxes Avenue with a 5-foot-wide sidewalk with a 5- foot-wide boulevard. 6. Submittal of the city’s sustainability design questionnaire. 7. The proposed east-west sidewalk along the north lot line shall be angled to the south toward the west lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. Revised plans must be submitted along with the building permit for the construction of the new building. Public RESOLUTION NO. 2023-22 Page 3 easement must be established over this sidewalk to all public usage. The property owner shall be responsible for maintenance. 8. The maximum height of the building shall be 18 feet tall. 9. The property owner shall be responsible for all proposed landscaping on the site. In any time in the future, if any of the proposed plantings die, the property owner shall replace them, subject to approval of the city forester. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-22 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 4, 2023. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-16: Subdivision and Development Contract for 4404 Valley View Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-16 approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and the development contract. INTRODUCTION: City Homes is requesting a subdivision of 4404 Valley View Road to establish individual lots for their four-unit townhome project that was approved for this site in 2022. The proposal simply creates the lot for each unit so that they may be sold off individually. See attached subdivision and previously approved site plan with variances for this site. The development contract has been drafted by the city attorney and agreed upon by the applicant. ATTACHMENTS: Description Preliminary and Final Plat Revised Boulevard Sidewalk along Valley View Road Planning Commission Staff Report, Feb. 8, 2023 2022 Approved Site Plan/Landscape Plan for the Site Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Staff Presentation, Feb. 21, 2023 Resolution No. 2022-72: Approving a Site Plan with Variances at 4404 Valley View Road Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Development Contract Resolution No. 2023-16 PRELIMINARY (SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON HENN. CO. PLAT CHECKING) TOWNHOMEPROPOSEDTOWNHOMEPROPOSEDC1Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-796417917 Highway No. 7Web: www.advsur.comAdvanceSurveying & Engineering, Co.CITY HOMES4404 VALLEY VIEW RD.CLIENT/JOB ADDRESSEDINA, MNSHEET TITLEPROPOSED SITE PLANSHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 6DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE220782 JRDRAWING NUMBERJUNE 13, 2022DRAFTED DATE:SHEET SIZE: 22 X 34LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiarwith your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review ourproposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify thatthey match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar withlocal codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in thiscommunity are. Be sure to show this site plan to said officials, or any other officialsthat may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvalsbefore beginning construction or planning improvements to the property.2.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, aretaken from the siding and or stucco of the building.3.While we show the building setback lines per the City of Edina web site, we suggestyou show this site plan to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback linesare shown correctly. Do this BEFORE you use this site plan to design anything for thisproperty.20'10'01 INCH = 10 FEETAPRIL 25, 2022DATE SURVEYED:SURVEYED BY:WAYNE W. PREUS, PLS. #43503ADVANCE SURVEYING. & ENG., CO.#LICENSE NO.DATEJUNE 13, 2022# 52716Joshua S. RinkePROPOSED HARDCOVERWEST UNITS (WITH CANT.) 2,550 SQ. FT.WEST WALKS/STOOPS 196 SQ. FT.WEST DRIVEWAY 684 SQ. FT.WEST AC PADS 13 SQ. FT.EAST UNITS 2,842 SQ. FT.EAST WALKS/STOOPS 164 SQ. FT.EAST DRIVEWAYS 995 SQ. FT.EAST AC PADS 13 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 7,457 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 11,307 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 65.9% February 8, 2023 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Subdivision – 4404 Valley View Road Information / Background: City Homes is requesting a subdivision of 4404 Valley View Road to establish individual lots for their four-unit townhome project that was approved for this site in 2022. The specific plans approved are the only thing that can be built on the site. Only the City Council can approve of a different use or type of structure on the site. The proposal simply creates the lot for each unit so that they may be sold off individually. (See attached subdivision and previously approved site plan with variances for this site. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A Subdivision (Preliminary and Final Plat) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Easterly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Southerly: Apartments; zoned PRD-4, and guided for High Density Residential Westerly: New Horizon Day Care; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District; and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 11,691 square feet in size. The site is vacant today. Previously located on the site was the Burly hair salon, and before that was gas station. According to the MPCA, this site had a petroleum leak discovered and reported in 2008. The owner at the time worked with the MPCA to clean the site and provide the necessary documentation. The MPCA considers the site cleared for development and they do not require any other documentation. MPCA stated the City of Edina can approve permits for construction on this site. Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node Zoning: PCD-1, Planned Commercial District Lot Dimensions There are no minimum lot size requirements for multi-family housing in the PCD-1 zoning district. Park Dedication As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created. Therefore, a park dedication fee of $15,000 would be required for the three additional lots. Recommendation Recommend the City Council approve the proposed subdivision (Preliminary Plat). Approval is based on the following findings: 1. This lot was approved for a four-unit townhome development in 2022. Approvals included a Site Plan and multiple variances. 2. The specific plans approved are the only thing that can be built on the site. Only the City Council can approve of a different use or type of structure on the site. 3. The proposed subdivision will accommodate individual home ownership for each of the four units. 4. The applicant intends to construct the townhomes as approved by the City of Edina. 5. There are no minimum lot size requirements in the PCD-1 zoning district. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Park dedication fee of $15,000 must be paid. b. A construction management plan for the construction of each home. 2. Compliance with the approved Site Plan and Variances on the site. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Subdivision subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City Decision: March 21, 2023 West Unit 1 West Unit 2 East Unit 2 East Unit 1 Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Roof Deck Concrete DrivewayConcrete Driveway Concrete Driveway Existing Home (4) S M Spirea (3) Pyr Arborvitae s i m p l y h o m e s i n c Oaklawn Avenue0 5 10 20 (6) A F Dogwood Perennial Bed Typical at Front Entrances (1) American Linden (Basswood) (1) American Linden (Basswood) (1) P Elm (1) H W Maple (2) Colorado Blue Spruce (3) Colorado Blue Spruce (1) P F Crab (8) Pyr Arborvitae (3) S M Spirea (2) P F Crab Modular Block Retaining Wall @ West and North Property Line Typical Building Base Planting: Bark or stone bed w/mixed low height plantings Notes to Drawing: 1.All areas shall be sodded unless noted otherwise 2.Provide root barrier at paving, building edges and utilities when trees within 5’ 3.All lawn and landscape areas shall be irrigated with fully functional irrigation system (1) P Elm (10) S M Spirea (12) Pyr Arborvitae (7) P G Aspen s i m p l y h o m e s i n c Maintenance Edge Shovel Cut Modular Block Wall Deciduous Tree Planting Shrub and Groundcover Planting EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site EdinaMN.gov 4 Site EdinaMN.gov 5 Site The CITY of EDINA Subdivison – 4404 Valley View Road The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINAThis Request Requires: EdinaMN.gov 5 Subdivision (Preliminary and Final Plat) The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of EDINABetter Together EdinaMN.gov 9 The CITY of EDINAStaff Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 11 Buildable Area The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 13 2018 Approved Overall Development Plan Site CUP Approved for 4 units on the subject site Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments 4404 Valley View Rd Subdivision Better Together Edina Project: 4404 Valley View Road Subdivision VISITORS 24 CONTRIBUTORS 9 RESPONSES 9 0 Registered 0 Unverified 9 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 9 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 28, 2023 13:12:02 pm Last Seen:Jan 28, 2023 13:12:02 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Janey Westin Q2.Address 6136 Brookview Ave., Edina Q3.Comment This property is zoned PCD-1; for Planned Commercial use. What has been most recently approved, is two residential DUPLEXES. (They are not row houses, by any stretch of the imagination.) They are not being built or sold for commercial use. So why is the current lot, still zoned as PCD-1 ? If the lot were zoned as R-1/R-2, reflecting what HAS been approved, the extremely small proposed lots would be getting a different kind of scrutiny. Why is this division being pursued? Is the developer's proposal to divide this single lot into 4 individual lots, desired for the sole purpose of making each duplex unit more attractive to potential buyers, because they would not have monthly association fees? Or, is the reasoning here, to divide it up, build the more viable eastern duplex units of lots #3 and #4, and then sell off lots #1 and #2 for someone else to have a try with something commercial to be built at a later date? The extremely short, combined driveway configuration of the western duplex is not safe for sidewalk pedestrians or drivers attempting to exit onto Valley View. Parking any vehicle in front of the garage of the westernmost unit, would only be possible with a very small, short vehicle. The two western units, if ever built, may take a very, very long time to sell. In the survey document attached to Better Together, I see that the Valley View sidewalk is now shown to be right at the curb, rather than a couple feet back, where snow plows on Valley View can put snow, and still have sidewalk access for pedestrians. Is this a change from what was approved on the earlier surveys? The developer needs to be asked for logical and well reasoned explanations to these questions before any decisions can be made on this proposed division. Plus, the Planning Department needs to take a serious look at the current lot's PCD-1 status. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 31, 2023 11:30:17 am Last Seen:Jan 31, 2023 11:30:17 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Andy Lewis Q2.Address 6117 St Johns Ave Q3.Comment As a resident of the neighborhood, I am supportive of this common sense action to allow for the previously approved town homes to be built as/on individual lots. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 08, 2023 09:59:50 am Last Seen:Feb 08, 2023 09:59:50 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Laura Ericksen Q2.Address 6037 Wooddale Q3.Comment As a homeowner in the neighborhood I STRONGLY OBJECT to any variances for the project at 4404 Valley View Road. ALL codes for setbacks and height restrictions should be strictly adhered to for any development of this property. The developer knew or should have known what restrictions were required when they purchased the property. I realize that covid and the economy may not have been considered when the property was purchased and has changed the situation considerably. That is a risk you take in business. My question to the Council is why should the neighbors have to bear the brunt of the developers decisions. The neighbors should not be worse off at the end of any development because of decisions by the developer. First let's address the request to change the setbacks. To leave my house I drive by this area/intersection 60-65% of the time. This is a weird to navigate, busy intersection. Changing the setback rules would reduce visibility and make driving more dangerous. During evening rush hour, traffic is often backed up from the light at Wooddale to Highway 62. The developer wants to add three driveways, one on Valley View and two on Oaklawn. Driving west on 62nd Street to turn north on to Oaklawn is already difficult due to the slope of the road. Adding multiple driveways will exacerbate the problem. Changes would impact not just the immediate area but those that live west of France, north of Highway 62 and east of Highway 100. A committee carefully selected by the city, developed the small area plan taking into account what local residents wanted for their neighborhood. The plan was approved by the city. The developer wants the city to change those plans for his sole convenience and profit. I think those who own property and live in the area should have their wishes and desires for the neighborhood carry heavier weight than some one who only cares about the area as long as they can make a profit and are invested in the neighborhood only as long as it takes to build their latest project. By ignoring height restrictions the property immediately to the north will loose their sun as may another house or two to the north. This will impact their trees and other vegetation, to say nothing about any sunlight through their windows during our long winters. According to Hennepin County Property Tax record current owners bought the property in 2002, long before this teardown craze started. They could not have predicted how directly impacted they could become due to a developers plans. It should have to become their problem, but will if approved. The developer's plan shows over 66 percent of the lot will be building or impenetrable driveways. This will change how water from rain or snow will drain from the property. How does the City and or developer plan to make sure no one in the neighborhood, not just the properties immediately adjacent to site, are harmed by the changes to drainage? How will they be made whole if their property is flooded? The City has an abysmal track record in dealing with flooding of homeowners property. We shouldn't add to that track record when it can be easily avoided. Please reject any and all variances for this project! Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 22, 2023 13:59:17 pm Last Seen:Feb 22, 2023 13:59:17 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Maggi Bookey Q2.Address 5845 Ashcroft Avenue Q3.Comment This project was approved last summer as homes that will be sold to individual owners. That was always the intent and what we wanted for our city. We are not looking for rentals and do not want rental properties in our neighborhood and we did not support this project for that type of product. Thank you!!!! Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 22, 2023 15:13:07 pm Last Seen:Feb 22, 2023 15:13:07 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Tom Hoffman Q2.Address 4228 Sidell Trail Edina 55416 Q3.Comment I am excited about this project. It is perfect product for my spry but aging mother and we want he close to us as she ages. We were excited to see an alternative/condo solution rather than rental properties. The nice about investing in Edina is that it has historically preformed better than most MPLS suburbs if not all. Renting is not in our consideration set. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 22, 2023 20:08:31 pm Last Seen:Feb 22, 2023 20:08:31 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kathryn Laabs Q2.Address 6612 Brittany rd. Edina, MN Q3.Comment I believe the Edina Flats project was tastefully done and cleaned up a previously unsightly area. I also think it's an excellent option for individuals who want to maintain home ownership but don't want the responsibilities of a yard while feeling like they still have access to the outdoors. My parents have considered these units as an option for their downsizing so they might move closer to family without feeling like they are in an apartment complex. They wish to live among other home owners and not renters who might not be as invested in the care and maintenance of the property and well being of the community. I support the addition of units in this area. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 23, 2023 14:37:51 pm Last Seen:Feb 23, 2023 14:37:51 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Britta Hovey Q2.Address 5617 Zenith Ave So. Q3.Comment The city should continue to advocate for housing developments and developers like this who offer options for Seniors to Age in Place close to family without forcing them into rentals. Edina is known for multi-generational families. It is a uniqueness Edina should hold tight to in order to not be like every other city and excel. There is extreme need for this type of product in our city. My father is in Assisted Living in Edina. Many people who live there had no other option to downsize & remain close to home to Age in Place. They get taken advantage of by the corporations/franchisees because the cost is always to high for the value. Not allowing subdivisions for the approved project would mean discouraging developers in this space and creating more rentals which is not meeting the need of Edina’s aging population.. Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 24, 2023 11:00:40 am Last Seen:Feb 24, 2023 11:00:40 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kris Fitzpatrick Q2.Address 6020 Oaklawn Ave. Q3.Comment I heard this project might turn into rentals. Is that true and why? Hoping it's NOT true. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Feb 27, 2023 09:25:25 am Last Seen:Feb 27, 2023 09:25:25 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Janey Westin Q2.Address 6136 Brookview Ave, Edina Q3.Comment This property is currently zoned PCD-1 Condominium. What has been approved to be built, is two duplexes. Because it is zoned for commercial development, any of the four units could LEGALLY be used for business-- in whole, or on a partial basis. Here are possible examples: Someone could buy Units 1+2, live in Unit 2, and operate a business out of the Unit 1. Or, an owner could convert the lower bedroom level of their unit into a business, and use the rest of the unit as the residence. The biggest issue with these possibilities, is the lack of any space for customer or employee parking, particularly with Units 1+2. That ends up putting customer parking onto the residential neighborhood streets, since there is no parking allowance on Valley View or 62nd Street for the distance of one to two blocks away. The closest street parking, is on Oaklawn, approaching the dangerously curved, partially blind intersection of Oaklawn, 62nd and Valley View. In the circumstance of a 2-3 day snowstorm, as we just experienced, there is no street parking. What happens with delivery vehicles? Where do they park? PCD-1 zoning would allow multiple deliveries in one day, as well as multiple employees to work in any of these units. The lack of parking for businesses, was a big factor in two PREVIOUS proposals by City Homes, for THIS property. The previous proposals were NOT approved. To allow division of this already too small and oddly shaped lot, makes it even easier for this type of future business use scenario to become a reality. Because the previous City Council has already approved the two duplexes for this single lot, the City has put itself into a difficult predicament, with no other precedence in the city. Attempts to compare this property with the combined commercial/condo building on the SW corner of 50th and France, is ludicrous. The request to divide, should have been part of the whole package of the original proposal to put two duplexes on this PCD-1 Condominium zoned lot. There isn't a good reason to allow division of this lot. Allowance will create a myriad of problems for traffic, parking, and residents in the neighborhood. Put the brakes on this proposal, and get this single lot rezoned for 2 residential duplexes use, as an R-2 property. After that, if City Homes wants to still request division, then it can be considered in light of what the property really is-- it is not a single condominium building; nor is it "row houses". (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) ROW AT VALLEYVIEW This DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (this “Contract”) dated as of ____________________, 2023, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and CITY HOMES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for ROW At Valley View (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, “FAIRFAX, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA” according to the recorded plat thereof. The property is approximately 11,691 square feet and is zoned PCD-I, Planned Commercial District. The Developer plans to create four (4) individual lots for a four-unit townhome development project (the “Improvements”)1 that has been approved by the City. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the escrow required by it and record the plat 1 NTD: I believe the Improvements should be the 4-unit townhome development project, not the iron monuments but let me know if that is incorrect. with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 100 days after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth or remove trees, unless a grading permit has been approved by the City Engineer following approval of a preliminary plat by the City Council, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary escrow has been received by the City, and 3) the plat and this Contract have been filed with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles’ office. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall deposit $5,000.00 with the City, as security for the setting of the iron monuments. The Developer will install and pay for the setting of the iron monuments . In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security, if any, is released. The Developer’s surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed at which time the City will refund the Developer the security in the amount of $5,000.00. 6. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the Improvements. 7. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required Improvements prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first finished unit. 8. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City and in accordance with this Contract and all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. 9. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall submit construction management plans for the construction of each townhome for the City’s review and approval. B. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall pay a cash contribution for the park dedication fee in the amount of $15,000.00. C. The specific plans approved by the City are the only structures that can be built on each lot. If the Developer wishes a different use or type of structure on any lot, Developer must receive the City’s review and approval of the change prior to any construction. D. Each lot owner, being the Developer, must receive the City’s review and approval of the plans and specifications prior to the construction of the individual townhome. E. The Developer shall comply with the approved Site Plan and variances on each lot. 10. ADMINISTRATION AND FEES FOR CITY SERVICES. The Developer shall reimburse the City for legal expenses actually incurred and shall pay the City an administrative fee, including engineering costs, related to plan review, drafting of this Contract and any other necessary items incurred by the City prior to execution and delivery of this Contract. 11. ESCROW. To ensure compliance with the terms of this Contract, and construction of all Improvements, and satisfaction of all other obligations herein, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow in the amount as required under this Contract. The City may draw down the escrow, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any uncured violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required Improvements are not completed before the date as provided herein, the City may also draw down the escrow with five (5) business days written notice to Developer. If the escrow is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Improvements have been completed and financial obligations to the City hereunder have been satisfied, with City approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, the escrow shall be promptly released to the Developer. This escrow amount shall be submitted to the City prior to execution and delivery of the Contract. 2 Upon completion of the work contemplated hereunder, the remaining escrow shall be promptly released to Developer. 12. SUMMARY OF ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. The amount of the escrow described above is calculated as follows: ESCROW Professional/Legal Services $_________.__ City’s Administrative Fees _________.__ Setting of Iron Monuments 5,000.00 ESCROW TOTAL _________.__ This breakdown is not a restriction on the use of the escrow. TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS $ . 13. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the approval of the plat, including but not limited to Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and construction 2 NTD: This is covered in Section 10. observation inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat as provided herein. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development, except to the extent caused by the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of the City or its officers, employees or agents. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and reasonable attorneys’ fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. Additionally, the Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City prior to any reductions in the security for the development. E. In addition to the charges referred to herein, other charges may be imposed such as but not limited to City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees for buildings constructed in the plat. 14. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as reasonably determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default, not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part agains the Developer. 15. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that, to the Developer’s knowledge, the plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, which is not cured following written notice to the Developer, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. In the event this Contract is recorded, upon request by Developer, the City covenants to provide a recordable Certificate of Completion and Release within a reasonable period of time following the request, upon the completion of the work and responsibilities required herein, payment of all costs and fees required and compliance with all terms of the Contract. A release of this Contract shall be provided in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as a Certificate of Completion and Release provided there are no outstanding or ongoing obligations of Developer under the terms of this Contract. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are, to Developer’s knowledge, no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. G. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Developer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Developer’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract. Developer’s indemnification obligation shall apply to Developer’s general contractor, subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Developer, or anyone for whose acts Developer may be liable. Developer agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council; provided, however, the City Council shall not unreasonably withhold or delay its consent to any assignment of this Contract to an affiliated entity of Developer, which is owned or controlled by Developer or its members. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it, until the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Completion and Release. J. Should the Developer convey any lot or lots in the plat to a third party, the City and the owner of that lot or those lots may execute a separate Site Improvement Performance Agreement or amend this Contract or other city approvals or agreements for development or use of those lots without the approval or consent of the Developer or other lot owners in the plat. Private agreements between the owners of lots within the plat for shared service or access and related matters necessary for the efficient use of the plat shall be the responsibility of the lot owners and shall not bind or restrict City authority to approve applications from any lot owner in the plat. The City acknowledges and agrees that (a) the Developer shall only be responsible hereunder for the construction of the Improvements, and (b) the Developer shall not be responsible for any construction or other obligations related to the future development of the lots in the plat, which shall be the responsibility of the developers of such lots. 16. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: City Homes, LLC, 3918 Sunnyside Road, Edina, Minnesota 55424. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] CITY OF EDINA A Minnesota municipal corporation By: _____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) And _____________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2023, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. _______________________________________ Notary Public DEVELOPER: CITY HOMES, LLC A Minnesota limited liability company By: Rebecca Remick, Its Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2023, by Rebecca Remick, the Manager of City Homes, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. _______________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 DSK RESOLUTION NO. 2023-16 APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT AND THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR 4404 VALLEY VIEW ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 City Homes is requesting a subdivision of 4404 Valley View Road to establish individual lots for their four-unit townhome project that was approved for this site in 2022. The specific plans approved are the only thing that can be built on the site. Only the City Council can approve of a different use or type of structure on the site. The proposal simply creates the lot for each unit so that they may be sold off individually. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lot 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 The Subject Property is guided NN, Neighborhood Node under the City’s Comprehensive Plan and is zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District 1. 1.04 On September 7, 2022, the City Council granted approval of a Site Plan with Variances to construct 4 rowhouses (4 units of housing) on the subject property. 1.05 On February 8, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the subdivision request. At which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Vote. 5 Ayes and 0 Nays. Recommendation for approval. 1.06 On February 21, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. This lot was approved for a four-unit townhome development in 2022. Approvals included a Site Plan and multiple variances. 2. The specific plans approved are the only thing that can be built on the site. Only the City Council can approve of a different use or type of structure on the site. 3. The proposed subdivision will accommodate individual home ownership for each of the four units. Resolution No. 2023-16 Page 2 4. The applicant intends to construct the townhomes as approved by the City of Edina. 5. There are no minimum lot size requirements in the PCD-1 zoning district Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary and Final Plat and the Development Contract for 4404 Valley View Road subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Park dedication fee of $15,000 must be paid. b. A construction management plan for the construction of each home. 2. Compliance with the approved Site Plan and Variances on the site. 3. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy of the first unit, the new property irons creating the new lots must be set. Resolution No. 2023-16 Page 3 Adopted this 4th day of April 2023. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 4, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review for 7200 France Avenue, Phase 2 Hotel Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested. Provide the applicant non-binding comments on a future land use application. INTRODUCTION: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan review of Phase 2 of the 7200/7250 France Avenue redevelopment site. The approved overall development plan for this site included a 150-unit apartment building, and 10,000 square feet of retail. Hospitality uses were discussed with the overall development plan, and one of the permitted uses allowed is a hotel. The applicant is now proposing a 150-room hotel and a restaurant on the main level at the corner of France and 72nd Street. The general mass and scale of the building would be the same. See attached proposed sketch plans. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Memo - March 29, 2023 Applicant Narrative and Plans Approved PUD Plans for the Site Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines Resolution No. 2023-11 (Final Approvals) PUD-16 - Ordinance No. 2022-13 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 29, 2023 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – Phase 2 Hotel, 7200 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan review of Phase 2 of the 7200/7250 France Avenue redevelopment site. The approved overall development plan for this site included a 150-unit apartment building, and 10,000 square feet of retail. Hospitality uses were discussed with the overall development plan, and one of the permitted uses allowed is a hotel. The applicant is now proposing a 150-room hotel and a 7,500 square foot restaurant on the main level at the corner of France and 72nd Street. The general mass and scale of the building would be the same. (See attached proposed sketch plans.) This request would require the following: A PUD-16 Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan and Site Plan Review for Phase 2. The table on the last page of this report demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the existing PUD Standards on the lot. Issues/considerations for discussion: Current Zoning, PUD-16, Planned Unit Development. As mentioned above, the current zoning of the site is PUD-16. The existing zoning allows for 72-foot-tall building. Permitted uses include multifamily residential and hotel. Phase one contemplated 10,000 square feet of retail on the north lot (Phase 2). This proposal is for a 150-room hotel with a 7,500 square foot restaurant. OR, Office Residential Designation. The following is the land use description for OR, Office Residential (which this site is guided) in the Comprehensive Plan: “Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher-intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway-oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” The proposal would be a service use that would provide the same number rooms as residential units. The proposed plans would not impact the north-south and east west connections. The proposed plans follow key conditions of the PUD including pedestrian entrances on both 72nd Street and France Avenue. First level uses would activate the street and include a restaurant and spa or meeting rooms for the hotel. Building Materials & Facades. Buildings must be made of natural materials (stone, brick) on the first vertical 60 feet of a building, and first floor ceiling heights must be 16 feet tall. As suggested in the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines and by City Code; all new front building facades that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. When designing the final plans, the “street typologies” suggested in the Design Experience Guidelines should be more closely considered. Building Height. The proposed height would be consistent with the approved overall development plan and PUD-16 regulations (72 feet with a ceiling height of 16 feet on the main level). Sustainability. As a condition of PUD-16, the new building will require compliance with the City’s Sustainability Policy. Traffic & Parking Study. The traffic and parking study for the site would need to be updated to determine if proposed parking would be adequate and surrounding roadways can support the proposal, based on the new uses. Parking on phase 2 must accommodate overflow parking from phase 1. Initial rough parking calculations demonstrate that the overall project including both phases would be short parked. (See table on the following page.) The applicant is hoping for shared parking between the hotel and the office; office use during the day and hotel and restaurant uses at night. Hotel Entrance on 72nd Street. Consideration should be given to eliminating the proposed hotel entry drive on 72nd. The entry might be able to come off the north-south drive-aisle through the site. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Setback on 72nd Street. The applicant is proposing a 30-foot setback to the curb on 72nd Street, which is consistent with the Design Experience Guidelines. However, the PUD-16 Code requirement for this site is 35 feet measured to the curb. Compliance Table City Standard (PUD-16) (Measured to the curb) Proposed (Measured to the curb) Front – 72nd Street Front – France Ave. Front – Galagher Drive Side – West (north half) 35 feet 39 feet 25 feet 90 feet 30 feet* 50 feet 25 feet 150+ feet Building Height Phase 1 – 76 feet with a ceiling height of 20 feet on the main level Please 2 – 72 feet with a ceiling height of 16 feet on the main level 76 feet tall and 20 feet on the main level 72 feet tall and 16 feet on the main level Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.8 1.0 Parking Phase 1 – 317 stalls Phase 2 – 560 stalls (total)** 317 stalls 402** *Requires amendment to the PUD Ordinance * **Parking study will be updated for consideration of the restaurant & hotel uses City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 SKETCH P LAN SUBMISSION HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE AVENUE EDINA, MN 2 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. SITE CONTEXT 3 - 5 B. PROJECT OVERVIEW & HOTEL HIGHLIGHTS 6 C. THE VISION 7 - 8 D. PHASE 1 & 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9 E. PHASE 2 – HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 10 - 17 F. HOTEL MASSING AND CONCEPT IMAGERY 18 - 24 3 - A E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS4 - A E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N EXISTING BIRD’S EYE VIEWS| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 Hotel Site Hotel Site Hotel Site Hotel Site 5 - A E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N The team envisions this site as an opportunity to create a vibrant new development along the France Avenue corridor that will be a catalyst for growth. The proposed hotel provides a mixed-use component on the development site that compliments activities in the Office Building at 7250 and the surrounding neighborhood. • Project Team includes Orion Investments, ESG, and others to advance the development, entitlement and design of the hotel • The Greater Southdale District Plan and District Design Experience Guidelines serve as the main planning criteria for the design • Consistent with the City of Edina’s vision to create a new street grid system within the District • Development occurring in two phases (Phase 1 – Office) (Phase 2 – Hotel) with parking provided below a newly established grade OVERVIEW & HIGHLIGHTS PROJECTOVERVIEW: | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 HOTELPROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS: • 145 to 150 Keys catering to Business and Leisure Travelers • 4,000 SF Event Ballroom | Meeting Rooms for Corporate Users • Destination Bar and Restaurant • Boutique in character | Upscale yet Approachable • Potential Retail Spa Operation – Open to the Public • Rooftop Food & Beverage Venue Open to the Public 6 - B E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N SOUTHDALE VISION Architecture FieldOffice DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 8 the vision: build upon existing assets 8DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 Architecture FieldOffice DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 9 the vision: improve access 9DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 the vision:walkable the vision:human-scaled | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.20237 - C E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 8 - C E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I GN Architecture FieldOffice DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 12 the vision: architecturally varied 12DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 Architecture FieldOffice DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 14 the vision: family friendly 14DRAFT for review – May 18, 2017 the vision:green the vision:mixed-use | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 SOUTHDALE VISION DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS AFTER FULL DEVELOPMENT | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 W. 72nd STREET HOTEL BALLROOM FRANCE AVENUE S.PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING GALLAGHER DRIVE 9 - D E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N NNFRANCE AVENUE S.W. 72nd STREET GALLAGHER DRIVE HOTEL BALLROOM FRANCE AVENUE S.PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING W. 72nd STREET GALLAGHER DRIVE N PHASE 2 - HOTEL SITE| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 •Approx. 146,000 GSF Hotel building • 6 stories above grade •72’ building height • Approx. 26,450 SF Level 1 Footprint •Approx. 180 to 185 parking spaces on two levels below grade • Internal vehicular arrival court sized to accommodate coach buses • Two internal service bays sized at 12’ x 40’ at the P1 Level • Pedestrian access along internal streets and entry plaza • Rooftop food and beverage amenity terrace (open to the public) • Active public facing internal uses at the street level (Restaurant and Spa) HOTEL DATA 10 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N N HOTEL SITE POSITION| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING HOTEL 52’ 43’ 30’-8” 17’ DANILA PUBLIC EASEMENT FRANCE AVE. S.60’ ENTRANCESWEST ROADWAY- PUBLIC EASEMENT W. 72nd STREET 11 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N N PARKING LEVEL PLANS| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 DNILA PUBLIC EASEMENT Parking Level P2 Parking Level P1WEST ROADWAYParking EntranceEstimated Parking Quantity – 111 Stalls Estimated Parking Quantity – 74 Stalls Estimated Parking Quantity for both Levels - 180 to 185 Stalls 12 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N N LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 WEST 72ndSTREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Hotel Entry Drive Parking Entrance Below 13 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N N LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 WEST 72ndSTREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH 14 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N N LEVELS 3-6 FLOOR PLANS| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 Level 6 (Top Floor) Levels 3-5 (Typical) 15 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N HOTEL BUILDING HEIGHT| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 72’DANILA FRANCE AVENUE ELEVATION 16 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N HOTEL BUILDING HEIGHT| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202317 - E E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N AERIAL VIEW FROM THE NORTHEAST PRELIMINARY MASSING| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202318 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N AERIAL VIEW ABOVE FRANCE AVENUE PRELIMINARY MASSING| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202319 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N AERIAL VIEW FROM THE SOUTH PRELIMINARY MASSING| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202320 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N AERIAL VIEW FROM THE SOUTHWEST PRELIMINARY MASSING| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202321 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N AERIAL VIEW FROM THE WEST PRELIMINARY MASSING| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202322 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N AERIAL VIEW FROM THE NORTHWEST PRELIMINARY MASSING| SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.202323 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N THANK YOU! QUESTIONS? | SKETCH PLAN SUBMISSION – HOTEL AT 7200 FRANCE - EDINA, MN | 3.9.2023 THANK YOU QUESTIONS? 24 - F E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONTyped or Printed NameLicense # DateI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignature1/10/2023 5:02:14 PMT1.1PUDTITLE SHEETAuthor Checker01/10/237200 & 7250FRANCE AVE7250 FRANCE AVE, EDINA, MN55435FINAL PUD01/10/2023222702No. Description Date7200 & 7250 FRANCE AVE | P.U.D. 7200, 7250 FRANCE AVE | EDINA, MN 55435 PROJECT LOCATIONOWNER/DEVELOPER:Orion Investments6550 York Avenue South, Suite 207Edina, MN 55435Contact: Ted Carlson, Ph. 612-812-7788Contact: Drew Stafford, Ph. 952-200-3680CONTRACTOR:A&P Construction5500 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 600Minneapolis, MN 55416Contact: Jeff KrickPh: 952-607-4658ARCHITECT:ESG Architecture & Design500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080Minneapolis, MN 55415Contact: Nate Enger, AIAPh: 612-339-5508CIVIL ENGINEER:Civil Site Group5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422Contact: Dave KnaeblePh: 612-615-0060LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:Confluence530 N Third Street, Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401Contact: Jake Coryell, PLA, ASLAPh: 612-333-3702STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Meyer Borgman Johnson510 S Marquette Ave, Suite 900Minneapolis, MN 55402Contact: Marsha Swatosh, PEPh: 612-604-3616MECHANICAL ENGINEER:Emanuelson-Podas, Inc.7705 Bush Lake Rd.Edina, MN 55439Contact: John Henderson, PE, LEED AP BD+CPh: 952-930-0050ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:Emanuelson-Podas, Inc.7705 Bush Lake Rd.Edina, MN 55439Contact: Justin Artz, PE LEED APPh: 952-930-0050PARKING CONSULTANT:WALKER CONSULTANTS1660 S HIGHWAY 100 #545MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416Ph: 952-595-9116PROJECT TEAMVICINITYSITE LOCATIONPHASE 1 PARKING:PHASE 1A (7250 SITE): 230 PERMANENT STALLSPHASE 1B (7200 SITE): 83 TEMPORARY STALLS (IF NEEDED)TOTAL PHASE 1A + 1B = 313 STALLS• 1.87 STALLS / 1000SF OFFICE ON 7250 ONLY• 2.54 STALLS/ 1000SF OFFICE INCLUDING TEMP PARKING ON 7200PER CITY OF EDINA CODE OF ORDINANCES (SEC. 20-625) -DEFINES GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE AS: TOTAL BUILDING FLOOR AREA OF ALL CONDITIONED SPACE CALCULATED FROM OVERALL EXTERIOR WALL DIMENSIONS OF ALL BELOW AND ABOVE GRADE FLOORS.PER CITY OF EDINA CODE OF ORDINANCES -Sec. 36-1274: THE MINIMUM NUMBER OFBICYCLEPARKING SPACES REQUIRED SHALL BE FIVE PERCENT OF THE AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT. WHENEVER POSSIBLE, BICYCLEPARKING SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF A PUBLIC ENTRANCE TO A PRINCIPAL BUILDINGBUILDING METRICSPROJECT OVERVIEWTHIS PROJECT’S GOAL IS TO TRANSFORM A DILAPIDATED AND HISTORICALLY PROBLEMATIC SITE INTO A THRIVING CENTER FOR BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITY. DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CREATE 450-600 JOBS WHEN ASSUMING 3-4 PER 1,000 SF IN JOBSPROPOSED PRIMARY USES:•7250:•GENERAL OFFICE •SMALL RETAIL•7200:•MIXED USE 5 STORY BUILDING: •RETAIL•OFFICE•HOSPITALITY•RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED PUBLIC EASEMENTS AND AMENITIES• FRANCE AVE SETBACK BECOMES PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR WITH LANDSCAPED PATHS, TREESCAPES, AND SEATING AREAS• STORMWATER RETENTION BASIN WITH LANDSCAPED PATHS AND OVERLOOKS ON WEST SIDE OF SITE• DANILA STREET BECOMES PEDESTRIAN-ONLY CORRIDOR CONNECTED BY ADA-COMPLIANT RAMPS AND PATHS THROUGHOUT ENTIRETY OF SITE• NORTH-SOUTH SIDEWALKS AND DRIVE-AISLE TO BE DEDICATED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH SITE; INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AROUND PERIMETER OF SITEPHASE 2 ANTICIPATED PARKING COUNTS:POTENTIALLY 464 PENDING FINAL DESIGN FOR 7200 CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSINFILTRATION BASIN #1SIDEWALKEASEMENT, TYP.DROP OFF AREADROP OFF AREA325.01S00°11'54"E 520.01S89°51'35"E325.01N00°11'54"W PARCEL #4 France Ave (A Public R/W)AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBCCCCEEEEEEFFBFGGGGGGGHJJJKKDLLLLLLLLAABLLGFFLBFAGAAEIIIMLIFFIIIAWALKCRETAINING WALLDEFBENCH FEATURESGWASTE AND RECYCLINGHBIKE RACKSIJPLANTERSPLAN KEYNOTES:BPLANTING BEDKSTAIR W/ HANDRAILSLSIGNAGETABLE AND CHAIRSNATIVE VEGETATION / SEEDDECORATIVE PAVING / ROCK MATERIALMSCULPTURAL / ART MOMENTENTRYMOTORCOURTFUTUREDEVELOPMENT7200FUTUREMOTORCOURTOVERLOOKFEATUREPUBLICART /ELEMENTCOURTYARDLANDSCAPE SITE PLAN01L1.0 20'40'10'0'SCALE:1"=20'L1.0LANDSCAPE SITE PLANSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/10/2021 11:30:10 AM 22113JCTM7200-72507200-7250 France AvenueSouth, Edina, MNNo.DescriptionDateP.U.D.SUBMISSION01/10/2023LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comINFILTRATIONBASIN7250DEVELOPMENTCOURTYARDCOURTYARD 2 PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONTyped or Printed NameLicense #DateI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignature1/10/2023 4:57:09 PMA0.1PUDEXISTING SITE PHOTOS(7200 & 7250)ESG ESG06/30/227200 & 7250FRANCE AVE7250 FRANCE AVE, EDINA, MN55435FINAL PUD01/10/20232227027200 & 7250 FRANCE AVENUE -OVERALL EXISTING SITE AERIALS7200 FRANCE AVENUE -EXISTING SITE AERIALS & PHOTOS7250 FRANCE AVENUE -EXISTING SITE AERIALS & PHOTOSNo. Description Date PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONTyped or Printed NameLicense # DateI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignature1/10/2023 4:59:55 PMA0.7PUDPHASE 1 AND 2 SITERENDERINGSESG ESG06/29/227200 & 7250FRANCE AVE7250 FRANCE AVE, EDINA, MN55435FINAL PUD01/10/2023222702PHASE 1B SITE RENDERING -TEMPORARY SURFACE PARKING CONDITIONPHASE 2 -SITE RENDERING W/ POTENTIAL BUILDING @ 7250PHASE 1A SITE RENDERING -ASSUMED TEMPORARY GREEN SPACENo. Description Date PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONTyped or Printed NameLicense # DateI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignature1/10/2023 4:59:55 PMA0.8PUDEXTERIOR RENDERINGS(7200 & 7250)ESG ESG06/30/227200 & 7250FRANCE AVE7250 FRANCE AVE, EDINA, MN55435FINAL PUD01/10/2023222702No. Description Date PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONTyped or Printed NameLicense # DateI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of MinnesotaSignature1/10/2023 4:59:55 PMA0.9PUDEXTERIOR RENDERINGS(7200 & 7250)ESG ESG06/29/227200 & 7250FRANCE AVE7250 FRANCE AVE, EDINA, MN55435FINAL PUD01/10/2023222702No. Description Date EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site Site EdinaMN.gov 5 Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 Table of Contents A. Preface What are Design Experience Guidelines? 1. Introduction page 1 Placemaking Through the Lens of Experience 2. The Vision pages 3-5 The Greater Southdale District Experience 3. The Framework pages 7-11 The 200’ x 200’ Grid Street Rooms and Seams 4. The Guidance pages 13-35 Public Realm Experience Transitions and Connections Street Room Typologies 5. Implementing and Measuring Experience page 37 Ten Things to Remember Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page c APreface What are Design Experience Guidelines? Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page A1 For nearly four years, a Work Group comprised of Edina residents and business leaders contemplated the future evolution of the Greater Southdale District, using the notion of “experience” as the foundational element from which to shape the district over the next 50 years. The first phase of the Work Group’s efforts consisted of developing Working Principles that would guide the group’s efforts into subsequent stages as well as suggest a dialog for considering new introductions within the district. Phase Two translated these principles into an urban design framework plan that proposed enhanced connections across existing major streets, introduced a new block framework to encourage walkability, and posed design strategies to create an improved public realm and promote higher quality, pedestrian-oriented development. The broader experience the urban design framework strives to achieve is the creation of a Greater Southdale District that connects seamlessly between the existing urban and residential fabric, maximizes the development potential of each site, enhances walkability and livability, and encourages interaction among current and future residents, businesses, and institutions. The urban design framework is the foundation to the Greater Southdale District Plan, a part of the City of Edina 2018 Comprehensive Plan. The Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines is a companion to those documents, outlining high-level planning and design strategies for public realm, site, and building design supporting the desired experience outcomes. The Design Experience Guidelines sets baseline guidance for developers, designers, City of Edina staff, Planning Commissioners and members of the City Council when proposing, designing or evaluating proposed introductions within the Greater Southdale District. Use of the Design Experience Guidelines The Design Experience Guidelines apply to proposed development within the Greater Southdale District and former Pentagon Park, and should be referred to when embarking on new development or redevelopment. The Design Experience Guidelines also offer direction for new public realm features and the reimagining of existing public infrastructure. The document does not stand alone; it must be considered as part of a larger set of district goals, urban design framework and patterns, and policy guidance outlined in the Greater Southdale District Plan and the 2018 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. Together, these documents set forth A. Preface What are Design Experience Guidelines? Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page A2 City expectations for the future form of the Greater Southdale District, and inform all potential projects within the district. The Design Experience Guidelines are not a substitute for City of Edina zoning codes and ordinances, but instead provide substantial background for developers and design teams and a framework from which to approach proposed projects within the district. The Design Experience Guidelines clarify the dimensional characteristics of eight different Street Room typologies that together form the experience within the district. The physical qualities of each street room’s height and width, and shaped by the architecture of the district, informs the design of the public realm on streets that connect and bind the human experience of the district. These physical characteristics also shape the experience of transition – transitions from existing single-family neighborhoods and transitions into and out of the district, outlining gradual changes in building scale within these critical transition areas to bridge between one- and two-story residences and the greater intensity of the Greater Southdale District. In conjunction with the Urban Design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan, this document provides both a philosophical and practical framework to facilitate discussion among the City, development teams, and the community when considering proposals for change within the district. During the recommended Sketch Plan review process (described on page 70 of the Greater Southdale District Plan), the Design Experience Guidelines are intended to facilitate dialog about broader district goals, patterns and connections, building massing, programmatic opportunities and shared public realm connectivity. Dialog at this point in the review of a proposal requires imagination, looking beyond the immediate site to imagine the creation of a consistently positive human experience, requiring a proposal to recognize the ways in which it influences that experience on adjacent and nearby sites. Once a proposal progresses beyond the Sketch Plan, the document is used as a test of outcomes and touchstone to measure how every proposal meets the desired district experience. Further specific design details related to landscaping, curb and intersection design, stormwater management and daylighting, lighting standards, street furniture, and a host of other factors related to the experience of the district will be described in future versions of this or a similar document as the need for direction related to those features becomes better understood. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page A3 1 Introduction Placemaking Through the Lens of Experience Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 1 Places link our past to the future. Within every community there exists a context of memory and identity. That context is made up of the choices/ decisions of the past and is inseparable from the physical identity of place; how buildings and streets look, and what parks and open space feel like. These choices are integral to what a place will become. By describing the evolving Greater Southdale District through experience criteria shaped by the physical context, a framework emerges for how streets will be structured, the relationship of open space to buildings, and how together the designed environment will support the desired experience outcome. To expand this basic idea into contemporary design is to be both democratic and innovative. What it means to be democratic is to encourage everyone to contribute to the possibilities of a new experience within the notion that its comes from what is unique about living in Edina. To be innovative is to reach beyond current conditions to create an extraordinary place and experience. Placemaking is not an act of invention... it is the study of how a unique place in world works, in combination with bringing contemporary design into alignment with the existing characteristics. The tools created via a collaborative process of engagement with the Greater Southdale Area Work Group takes this approach to the planning of the overall district, with the intent of providing the community, civic leaders, developers and designers the inspiration to think about the possibilities of this place in new and enterprising ways. 1. Introduction Placemaking Through the Lens of Experience In the making of the Greater Southdale District we must: • Support the public realm • Create equity throughout • Respect the larger context • Express the collective nature of community • Attend to all street rooms equally • Represent the whole in all actions • Put the collective before individual expression • Act to support the next 200 years of the Edina community — Architecture Field Office, 2018 Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 2 2 The Vision Aspirations for the Greater Southdale District Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 3 Background and Context Collectively, for nearly four years, the Greater Southdale Area Work Group has focused on building upon our community’s history of innovation, engagement and community commitment to create a vision for the possibilities of the Greater Southdale District. This work has culminated in the Greater Southdale District Plan (adopted December 2018) and the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. Change is inevitable within the district. In the past five years alone, over 1,500 new housing units have been constructed or are underway, along with myriad other commercial projects. This is a tremendous opportunity in time, and in the broader evolution of our community. We can transform the physical environment of the Greater Southdale District from a traditional car-oriented suburban commercial district with its sea of surface parking lots and ‘superblocks,’ into a vibrant place whose character is neither urban nor suburban, but blends the best characteristics of both to create a place that is uniquely of Edina. This new model will support all modes of transportation (cars, buses, bikes, scooters, and pedestrians) and serve future generations of Edina residents, employers, and visitors. It will complement, not compete with, the single family neighborhoods that have historically defined much of the community’s fabric. Within the broader 750+ acre Greater Southdale District, and the former Pentagon Park, there exist a remarkable variety of assets. This plan connects those assets with a new street grid that overlays a human scale and allows access via a variety of transportation options. The plan sets forth a strategy to bridge between adjacent single family neighborhoods and the more commercially focused areas of the district. And, it uses public realm infrastructure— including parks, plazas, green streets, woonerfs, and waterways that manage stormwater—as the connective tissue that gives the district its unique identity. Together, these attributes will set the stage for a remarkable daily experience for those who live, work and play within the Greater Southdale District. Aspirations for the Future Greater Southdale District The Greater Southdale Work Group summarized the overall districtwide vision and land use strategies as part of the District Plan. These aspirations, which follow, are at the foundation of design policy parameters and the overall experience we are striving to shape as the Greater Southdale Area evolves over the next 50 years. 1. Imagine Greater Southdale District evolution organized around human activity, with vibrant pedestrian-focused streets, beautiful parks and public spaces, and endearing and enduring buildings where: • A sense of invention is expected from new introductions, both public and private, that build on the district’s spirit of innovation. • Its role as regional and local center for living, shopping, working, learning, entertainment, hospitality, and medical services is enhanced. • Other Edina neighborhoods, near and distant, benefit from investment in the district and the evolution of each parcel. • Investment in the public realm is reflected by a commensurate investment as private parcels evolve. • Public and civic services accommodate a growing and diverse district and community population. • Transitions at the district’s edges recognize compatible use and scale and neighboring uses are perpetuated on their terms. 2. The Vision The Greater Southdale District Experience Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 4 2. Make the Greater Southdale District the model of healthy urban living where: • The district’s form encourages healthy living habits, particularly through walking. • The design of buildings and spaces, both public and private, attract the widest possible range of the district’s population. • Storm water is a valued resource by making it part of the experience of the district. • Emissions and pollutants are mitigated through the introduction of significant tree canopy and limiting idling vehicles on streets, creating a more inviting walking experience along the district’s streets. • Sustainable solutions result in a stock of healthy buildings that compel healthy activity for their occupants. • Public features mitigate impacts of non-local infrastructure, especially to contain the ill effects of adjacent highways. 3. Invent sustainable infrastructure matching the district’s sense of innovation where: • Mutually-supportive and forward-looking infrastructure is the norm, looking beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create a broadly supportive district infrastructure. • Infrastructure aligns with the creation of public space in the district, sharing space and resources that result in compelling, attractive and high-functioning civic spaces. • Care for and perpetuation of public infrastructure anticipates daily human activity in all seasons. 4. Create neighborhoods of activity within the broader mixed-use patterns of the district where: • Logical boundaries based on reasonable walking distances are established, with major streets as seams binding the activity of each side into an inviting and accessible public space. • Focal points of public activity are found within each neighborhood. • Key community services and facilities are present and help define the fabric of the District. • Core services are delivered within each neighborhood or in an adjacent neighborhood. • Neighborhoods are linked along street and park corridors highlighted by visible human activity. 5. Offer a spectrum of living opportunities integrated through the district where: • Housing orients to a variety of income levels and household types. • Ownership options constitute a significant portion of the living opportunities in the area. • “Missing Middle” living opportunities (duplexes, triplexes, side-by-side or stacked townhouses, rowhouses with multiple units, and small buildings with four to six apartments) allow a broader range of Edina residents, workforce members and others to consider relocating to the District. • Buildings for living strongly orient to the public spaces of each neighborhood within the District. 6. Expand significantly the number and extent of parks and public spaces where: • Opportunities for the introduction of another large signature public space complement the programming and activities available at Centennial Lakes. • An extension of the Promenade to Strachauer Park links neighbors and activity to the district. • New promenades on the East and West edges of the District create movement corridors for pedestrians and bicyclists and serve as vital places for a transition between neighborhoods and the District. • Parks and publicly accessible spaces are clearly visible and directly accessible from the public realm. • Spaces for visible human activity and occupation, either public or publicly accessible, occur on every block. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 5 7. Encourage district evolution based on incremental change and the creation of a great pedestrian experience where: • A basic framework of streets and blocks encourages pedestrian activity and well-considered buildings. • A rich variety of public or publicly accessible spaces are woven into the experience of the district. • Sites and buildings support a pedestrian experience first, with storage of cars not a focus. • Development on each site links to adjacent streets and to neighboring sites to create continuous, safe, and inviting pedestrian experiences. 8. Build (or plan for) a street network encouraging pedestrian movement across and through the district where: • Walkable block lengths (200 feet) are the baseline framework for development. • Enhanced and more frequent street crossings facilitates pedestrian movement. • Wide landscaped boulevards encourage pedestrian activity and create a distinct district signature. • Community corridors within and extending well beyond the district enhance bicycle and pedestrian access while accommodating vehicle traffic on pedestrian terms. 9. Imagine transportation in the district where: • Cars are not the focus and streets accommodate more than vehicles. • Major streets balance access and mobility. • Some streets serve as community corridors, linking to other community destinations with features that allow for movement in addition to cars. • Transit is a baseline service, both within the district and to non-Edina locations. • Transportation recognizes trends, including autonomous vehicles and a time when parking structures aren’t needed for public parking 10. Expect the delivery of high quality, well-designed buildings and sites where: • Spaces on sites are considered for people first, including connections between sites; then the ways structures are placed; and then places to store cars are found. • Visible human activity is prominent and integrated at every site. • People are brought to the streets via major building entries oriented to major streets. • Storm water remains visible as an amenity, allowing it to become a central part of the experience of each site. 11. Frame development guidance for evolution where: • Development review includes the desired experience, not solely quantitative thresholds. • Accommodation of adjacent and near parcels are considered in the evolution of a single parcel. • Early reviews focus on ideas, patterns and relationships, not specific and engineered plans, with that part of the review process based in dialog, not presentation and reaction. • Demonstrations of quality and especially quality from a long-term perspective are baseline considerations. • Collaboration leads to a superior result, with the community’s expectations clearly framed as part of the deliberation. • Flexibility is not a right, but rather the natural by-product of a fair exchange for benefits, collaboration, and quality in development. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 6 3 The Framework Building Blocks to Support the Vision Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 7 3. The Framework Building Blocks to Support the Vision THE 200’x200’ GRID There is an expectation of the street grid: it is democratic, it is uniform, it is connective. The uniform grid and the buildings that line the grid give the city its form. The space between buildings is used for access for pedestrians and vehicles; for entrance into both public and private buildings; and to provide light, air, and common green or social spaces. To break down the scale of the ‘superblocks’ that currently characterize the district’s overall land use framework, three distinct street grid patterns were considered, to inform what how the Greater Southdale District might transform into a more uniform and connected community. Small Portland blocks (200’ x 200’) were compared to the long blocks of New York City (200’x600’) and the larger square blocks of Minneapolis (350’ x350’). The Work Group focused on Portland as a model because of its walkability, and the scale of its buildings resulting from the 200 foot restriction on the length of building elevations fronting the public realm. Further studies analyzed land ownership patterns, size of property and generally how connections could made through the superblocks. It was concluded that the 200’ x200’ foot system was more adaptable to variety of site conditions supporting a more engaging public realm and opportunities for a better community experience. Considerations Width of street Sunlight in public spaces View corridors Building scale – height, length and footprint Transparency at street level Landscape, lighting and street furniture Streets and public realm paving Courtyards and pocket parks Cultural context – pride of place, historical framework Framework Vision: Block Organization Based on the Portland 200’ x 200’ square block layout This diagram overlays the general dimensions of the Portland block model on our primary test sites. Based on existing conditions, variations can occur in the nominal 200 by 200 square grid. N Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 8 c 180,000 200,000 180,000 200,000 Existing Sites: The criteria for buildings sites: Large parking area serving 1 story building Sites that are critical to the overall success of development in the district Important connections that would extend the public realm assets such as the Promenade Under utilized land that can be repurposed to serve the public realm goals of the district : Potential Building Sites This diagram illustrates those parcels within the Greater Southdale Area and adjacent Pentagon Park that are potential redevelopment opportunities. Criteria to measure the opportunity inherent in these sites include: • Sites that currently have large, dominating surface parking lots. • Sites that are critical to the overall success of development in the district. • Important connections that would extend existing public realm assets such as the Promenade. • Underutilized land that can be repurposed to serve the public realm goals of the district. NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 9 Potential Building Sites The diagram at right illustrates how the basic principle of a 200’ x 200’ grid can be applied nominally on potential redevelopment sites throughout the district without consideration of property line. It is recognized that land ownership will influence the ultimate form of the grid. Other considerations influencing block pattern: • Building scale • Public realm connections • Connections through blocks • Pedestrian-oriented street intersections The Space Between Buildings As a result of the 200’ x 200’ block pattern, the space between buildings becomes an important asset in shaping the overall sense of landscape and continuity of public realm throughout the district. Because the superblocks have primary responsibility for serving the vehicular traffic needs of the district, access to the smaller blocks for drop-off, service and parking can be planned to stay at the perimeter of a block, allowing for the spaces between the remaining block to be used for a network of green spaces that support the health and wellbeing of the community. c 180,000 200,000 180,000 200,000 v The Space between Buildings: As a result of the 200x200 foot block pattern is the space between building that becomes an important asset to the overall sense of landscape throughout the district. Because the super blocks have primary responsibility for the larger traffic needs of the district, access to the smaller blocks for drop off, service and parking can be planned to stay at the perimeter allowing the spaces between the remaining block to used for pocket parks, gardens, play areas and many other activities that support the health and well being of the community. The “space between” Buildings –as places and connections to larger community pathways ParksPocket parksRecreationPlay areasGardensStorm water managementWet landsWater ways : Opportunities for the “Space Between” buildings to become places and connections to larger community pathways: • Parks • Pocket Parks • Recreation • Play Areas • Gardens • Stormwater Management • Wetlands • Waterways c 180,000 200,000 180,000 200,000 v Block Pattern: The basic principal of a 200’X200’ grid was applied nominally throughout the district without consideration of property line. It is recognized that land owner ship will influence the ultimate form of the grid. Considerations: building scale public realm connections through block connections Pedestrian oriented street intersections (see intersection diagram) : N N Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 10 STREET ROOMS AND SEAMS With changes in the way people are living in cities and suburban environments, it is important to seek new ways in which our communities can be experienced without sacrificing the spatial and architectural values of existing neighborhoods. Defining the way in which transitions are seen and developed, and the way each street can have a different character, use and form, puts the emphasis on the public qualities of the public realm rather than on the buildings themselves. In this way buildings can develop based on highest and best use without compromising characteristics of existing community life. Respect of context can bring about a degree of commonality where every building is not required to mirror its context but rather, support a connected and meaningful community experience. The intention in the design visioning process for the Greater Southdale District was to create a new paradigm for suburban mixed use districts, in which individual buildings respect their context and each other. The ensembles created as part of this process are Street Rooms. In this approach, the geometry of the city plays an important part in the definition of the street room, by width of street, length of block, solar orientation and axis as it relates to other grids defining other public rooms of the city like courtyard, plazas and parks. The real identity of the city is closely related to how the city is seen up close, making it possible to understand the true character of a place. It is these up close characteristics that make a city unique. This holistic approach depends on an attitude of relational subjectivity in articulating the components of each street room. This means that each wall of a building is studied as a part of the street that it faces and in conjunction with the building directly across the street. Scale, color, material and construction details are considerations in the whole composition of the street room—allowing the street to communicate a sense of place and completeness. A district full of street rooms promotes activity and social discourse while signifying the possibility of new functions. The street room is a source of sense of community even when it is not in use, thereby stabilizing the overall fabric of the public realm. Street Rooms within the Greater Southdale District Throughout the Greater Southdale District, the public realm is defined by a series of street rooms. These rooms are further defined by edges, referred to as the “seam” between the volume of the street and the form of the building—which together, create the experience at a pedestrian scale. Seams dictate the basic height of the defining street room wall (i.e. the building podium) but not necessarily the rest of the building form, allowing buildings to respond to their context on all four sides of the building and creating a form that is appropriate for each street room surrounding it. This creates variety throughout the district, and supports the notion that there are transitions between characteristics of neighborhoods that are different in scale, program and building type. As an example, transitions from single family houses to 36-foot-tall or 60-foot-tall buildings will not have the same criteria as transitions from a podium base to taller structures sitting on the podium. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 11 The following considerations all factor into the development of public realm and street rooms. These ideas should be utilized and considered by decision-making bodies when reviewing proposed development projects. • Transparency of building walls in the public realm can be both private and public. When the ground plane is connected along and through the building wall, it creates a link to experience the richness of activities in the public realm • Buildings could be sited perpendicular to streets, allowing vistas and pathways through the new street grid. • Buildings can create a very consistent form and a clear sense of place within the public realm. Each building is part of the next – both internally and externally. Regardless of building age, the continuity of scale, rhythm and materials of each building that lines the street creates a sense of room. • Continuity of building material quality is contained within each stone, brick, window pattern and cornice to define the edges of the public realm and the street room • Continuity of architectural language in the edges of shapes and rhythm of openings define a street room into horizontal and vertical forms that frame the experience of being in room – whether interior or exterior. The architectural language of the street should not be replicated but rather understood and transformed in each new building within the context of its particular location within the Greater Southdale District. • Buildings frame the public rooms of the district (parks, pocket parks, playgrounds, etc.) and should represent the scale required to meet the needs of the community. Moving through these spaces, one should easily see choices for other desired destinations. • Good street rooms provoke a culture’s spatial imagination, social discourse and creative energy. The street typologies and corresponding guidelines on building form define experience and spatial form that connects the district together. • The structure of the street rooms is organized to support residents, defining a particular place within a neighborhood and the overall district. The memory of experiences in each of these rooms provides the experience of sense of place and connects to other places within the Greater Southdale District. • Walking is a shared experience. An engaging walk can be short, long, slow, quick, or meandering – in weather that is wet, calm, windy, sunny, bright, cold, hot, or snowing – in places that appear open, closed, low, tall, long, narrow, wide or expansive. The experience of walking through the street rooms must be full of events connecting to a broader set of experiences. • The materials of the walls that make up the street room define the characteristics of the public realm. A certain part of this will depend on the age of the street, the program of the building and the design style in which they were constructed. All of these factors, in whatever form, are read and experienced in different ways and need to be delineated clearly. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 12 4 The Guidance Shaping the Greater Southdale District Experience Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 13 4. The Guidance Shaping the Greater Southdale District Experience Overlaying a new street network and street grid is a fundamental strategy in breaking down the scale of the existing massive ‘superblocks’ within the Greater Southdale District and improving the public realm experience. All new development should begin with the premise of the 200-foot-square block as the measure by which a building footprint is determined. The space between buildings are streets—which could be for cars, bikes, pedestrians only, or transformed into parks and open space. By connecting the design of streets with the concept of street rooms, the district will transform to one that is human-scaled, comfortable, green, and flexible for change and evolution over the next 50 years. While each street room and neighborhood will provide a distinctive experience, there are certain characteristics that are common to streets throughout the Greater Southdale District, helping to creating a holistic experience for pedestrians and bicyclists, transit-riders, and drivers alike. Buildings lining the public realm/street room will incorporate a mix of uses, including housing, workplace/office, cultural, community, and commercial/retail space— setting the stage for a rich variety of experiences. The overall public realm experience within the Greater Southdale District is supported by: • Consistent building setbacks that create the opportunity for an expansive public realm within the district and sub-district. • More frequent intersections to promote pedestrian connections within the district and to neighboring districts. • Distinctive sidewalks that support the pedestrian experience, separate and dedicated bikeways, and appropriate number lanes of vehicular traffic. • Wide sidewalks with places for gathering, play areas, gardens, outdoor cafes, etc. • Publicly-accessible pocket parks and courtyards along the street and sidewalk extend the public realm of the sidewalk in between buildings. • Separate and dedicated bikeways, and an appropriate number of lanes of vehicular traffic. • Integrated signage and lighting systems that offer safety, interest and diversity to the pedestrian. • Consistent signage that reflects sub-district identity to promote wayfinding within the larger Southdale District, identifying characteristics of the street and public amenities. • Pedestrian and vehicular paving (permeable) that is unique to a sub-districts streets and sidewalks. • Trees that vary in species, installed in rows or clumps, and spaced to create visual interest and promote a range of experiences such as shaded groves with benches, or a sun-dappled outdoor cafe, along the street. • Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular access routes through larger blocks. • Safe, comfortable places where people can stop, view, socialize and rest. These may incorporate “landing zones” for ride sharing services such as Uber and Lyft — particularly near primary gathering places and public rooms along the Promenade, connector streets and future East and West Promenades. These places of respite should not conflict with other sidewalk uses. • Different, and defined, zones on all sidewalk: building frontage zone, street furniture zone, movement zone, and the curb. Cafes and outdoor seating can be located in the building frontage zone, extending the activity of a building to include the sidewalk. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 14 • Transit stops that are designed to provide districtwide continuity, reinforcing the qualities of the Greater Southdale District. • Integrated plantings, water features and/or art to enhance public open space. • Stormwater that is daylighted and used as a water feature or amenity, integrated into the overall experience of the street and the district. • Street parking provided at the curb to support a mix of activities for both residential and commercial activities. • Varied landscaping and street trees that create a canopy over the street. Consider the changing climate when selecting plant species with the understanding that indigenous plant materials may not always be the most appropriate choice. • Building equipment, mechanical exhaust systems and/or service areas concealed in a manner that does not detract from the pedestrian environment. • The public realm is for both summer and winter conditions and as such must be planned to be easily maintained in all conditions. Building owners and city stakeholders should plan for maintenance, operations and upkeep within the public realm. This includes prompt and thorough snow removal on every reach of the sidewalks, care and feeding of trees, landscape and decorative planters (which should be changed on a seasonal basis). Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 15 PRIMARY COMPONENTS OF THE PUBLIC REALM EXPERIENCE The following guidance is provided to assist the community, civic leaders, designers and developers in understanding the vision and baseline parameters related to both building and public realm within the Greater Southdale District. Connections • The overall strategy is to connect intersections, incorporate street typologies, and incorporate green systems to add value to the experience of the district. • The public realm is to be connected continuously north-south from Centennial Lakes, the Promenade, the Galleria, Southdale Center, Fairview Southdale, to Strachauer Park. All new development shall support that goal. • The public realm should be connected east-west from Edinborough Park to Centennial Lakes, west of France to Pentagon Park and Fred Richards Park to Highway 100 on the west. This will set up future connections to districts to the west—such as 70th and Cahill—supporting an overall vision of a more connected and integrated Edina community. • The district must be connected continuously east-west from the Cornelia neighborhood to Yorktown Park. • New north-south promenades should be created on the west side of France and east side of Xerxes as part of the broader strategy to sensitively transition to single family residential neighborhoods. • Expand Centennial Lakes Park to France Avenue… celebrate this important public amenity by making it more visible as a gateway into the district. • Create a dynamic landscape that includes water, especially stormwater expressed as part of landscape, to create public amenity spaces. • Streets within the superblocks, East and West Promenades, and extension of the Promenade north to Strachauer Park should be surfaced with pavers to promote a dominance of pedestrians and bikes over vehicles. • New parks and plazas shall be either public or publicly-accessible, not private, in nature. • Increase number of sidewalks, pathways, and smaller parks/gardens to better address mobility. Incorporate places to sit throughout the district. • New trees should provide continuity of the street room experience with canopies that are consistent with the Street Room Typology to enhance the continuity of pedestrian experience. Intersections • Street Room Typologies overlay each other, unifying the overall district experience through the recognition of unique conditions that evoke unique design responses based upon location. • Street Room Typologies connect intersections throughout the district, linking experiences together from one neighborhood to the next. • Street Room Typologies with lower façade heights take president over those with higher façade heights at these points of intersection. • The architecture of a façade of one block making up an intersection should be conceived as part of all corners of the intersection. • Crosswalks at intersections need to be an integral part of the public realm and continue the overall street room experience from one block to another. • The hierarchy of intersections will change based on an evolving context and investment in the intersection experience. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 16 Street Room Form • Building setbacks are to be considered as a part of the overall landscape and public amenities, and should be designed to create a continuous pedestrian experience along major corridors to support “pools of human activity.” • Every new development should connect all publicly-accessible spaces such as pocket parks, courtyards and plazas to the street room typology. • Along all major corridors, seventy five percent (75%) of face of building walls need to be at the setback line to support the creation of a ‘street room.’ • All new building façades in the district must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency at the ground level. • All building façades are prime (including parking) and must be designed accordingly. There is no back side of a building. • All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials facing the public realm. • Above 50-60 feet, glass, precast panels with brick/tile are the preferred material palette. Metal panel can be used as a secondary part of a wall system. • No building façade can be longer than 200’ without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. Building Form • Ground floors should have a minimum ceiling height of 20’ for flexibility. This floor-to-floor height will allow the space to accommodate commercial, two floors of parking, or two-story townhouses. • Above-grade parking structures should be designed with flat floorplates to allow for future conversion and lined with programmable public realm space to minimize the visual impact of car storage. • Within 50-60 feet of the ground, it is preferred that rooftops be programmed to accommodate residential or public user activities (e.g. a restaurant or terrace). • Rooftops facing the Promenades must be functional and programmed to provide interest and variety along these important pedestrian spines. • All development services, including rooftop mechanical systems, should be located within buildings and should not be visible from the public realm, or semi-private and private areas of the development. The exception are rooftop-mounted solar panels, which should be located on the highest point of the buildings. • Building footprints above 60 feet should be no greater than 12,000 SF for residential use and 24,000 SF for commercial space. • Design buildings for flexibility and adaptability in the future, including use of structural systems that will allow a building’s function to fundamentally change. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 17 TRANSITION AND CONNECTIONS Within the Greater Southdale District, a new network of streets will provide both commercial and resident access to new mixed- use buildings along France and York Avenues, keeping traffic out of the adjacent single family neighborhoods. These new streets offer the opportunity for new development to more gradually transition from the scale of the existing single family neighborhoods and the commercial heart of the Southdale District. New development within transition zones is expected to balance scale and building use between these single family neighborhoods and the higher density, more commercially focused Greater Southdale District. West and East Promenades The character of the West and East Promenades, new north-south streets that run to the west of France Avenue and the east of York Avenue, to are envisioned as woonerfs—shared streets for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles. This typology creates opportunities for multiple access to buildings for both below grade parking and service, as well as temporary/short-term parking for retail and building drop offs. Within the woonerf concept, pedestrians have priority over cars, and as a shared street, cars are forced to slow down and travel with caution. Because of their organization, these streets also can support a variety of uses, with building types catered to residential uses such as townhomes, with considerations for retail space that support less intensive commercial needs of adjacent neighborhoods. The sense of scale by way of width of street to height of building is maintained by creating a street form that is no less than 60 feet high at its edges, with developments potentially increasing in height as buildings reach the edge of the boulevards, and descending in height as they move to the single family neighborhoods, providing an edge to the east and west transition zones. Primary East-West Streets East-west streets through the Greater Southdale District connect existing single family neighborhoods to the heart of the district. The design of these streets is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and consistently-scaled buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience serves as a bridge, knitting together the single family residential neighborhoods and the greater intensity of the district. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine 66TH STREETVALLEY VIEW RD.66TH STREET69TH STREET70TH STREETHAZELTON RD.GALLAGHER DRPARKLAWN AVE76TH STREET77TH STREETMINNESOTA DR72ND STREETEDINBOROUGH WAY YORK AVENUE FRANCE AVENUE XERXES AVENUE BARRIE RD78TH STREETN Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 18 STREET ROOM TYPOLOGIES A hierarchy of streets and pathways within the district is the framework for public realm development and related building form. Each street across the district has a role in how it serves pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles in connecting sub-districts, adjacent single family neighborhoods, and the overall Greater Southdale District and creating a unified sense of place. It is the intent that street typologies define the public realm experience: the space between buildings, dimensions of building setbacks from the street, heights of facades at the building face at the street and building step backs, where the façade of the building steps back from the volume of the street room. Street Room Typology 1: Promenades and Transition Zones Promenades are new woonerf-type streets on the west side of France Avenue and on the east side of York Avenue. Within this typology, there are several different variations for new building development in these important transition zones, responding to and respecting the context of adjacent single family neighborhoods. Street Room Typology 2: Cornelia Overlay Zone With the understanding that there is special sensitivity related to new building development near the Cornelia neighborhood, this is a special zone governing the design of the public realm/street room on the east side of France Avenue between the north side of 69th Street and Gallagher Drive. Buildings within this zone will be expected to maintain the east side of the France Avenue street room, but will be of a lower overall scale than new Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6 Central Promenade Spine 66TH STREETVALLEY VIEW RD.66TH STREET69TH STREET70TH STREETHAZELTON RD.GALLAGHER DRPARKLAWN AVE76TH STREET77TH STREETMINNESOTA DR72ND STREETEDINBOROUGH WAY YORK AVENUE FRANCE AVENUE XERXES AVENUE BARRIE RD78TH STREETN Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 19 buildings at the north or south ends of France. Street Room Typology 3: New Local Streets These are new 60’ wide streets internal to existing superblocks. These streets will be constructed as new buildings are added to the district, and will help create the new network of streets and pedestrian pathways throughout the Greater Southdale District. Some of these spaces between buildings may become parks or plazas, extending the public realm. Others will become primary vehicular access for drop off and pick up, as well as access to parking and primary building services. Street Room Typology 4: Primary East-West Streets The existing 69th Street, 70th Street, Hazelton Road, Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street are important connections through the district from east to west. This typology is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and lower scale buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience of the single family residential neighborhoods is extended through the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 5: The Boulevards France Avenue, York Avenue, West 66th Street and West 77th Street are the district’s gateway streets. They carry the highest traffic volumes and are intended to have higher transit volumes than any other streets within the district. These streets will have the greatest impact in conveying the overall identity of the district: a consistent 50 foot setback with a double row of trees will extend the length of these streets, while consistency in building heights along the street edge will form the edge of the street room—bridging between the lower intensity and transitional areas and the higher intensity zones within the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 6: Central Spine The Central Spine comprises the existing Promenade, its potential expansion northward, and future connections to the west to Fred Richards Park. This important pedestrian network is an attractive destination for both residents and visitors alike. New development along the spine must respond to and respect this important public amenity. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 20 The sub-district to the west side of France between 69th and Parklawn is a unique transition zone within the Greater Southdale District. Any proposed developments within this zone should be approached with special sensitivity. This means that the street experience within that zone should be perceived as connected to the Cornelia neighborhood through landscaping and trees, and buildings that gradually transition in both height and function and use between lower intensity neighborhoods to the more commercially-focused district on the east side of France Avenue. The West Promenade, a new north-south pedestrian, bike and vehicle street/woonerf that accommodates service access, is envisioned between France Avenue and the Cornelia neighborhood. This new shared street is intended to provide service access to new developments along France (keeping vehicular traffic out of single family neighborhoods), and providing a new framework to support the transition from townhouses and lower-scale residential buildings on the west side of the West Promenade, to slightly taller buildings on the east side of the West Promenade. Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 21 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood As illustrated in the section above, within this transition zone, building heights will step up incrementally, from those that are adjacent to single family homes to those that are facing France Avenue to provide a more gradual transition from the residential neighborhood to the more commercially-oriented Southdale District. The street room experience within Typology 1A will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • New buildings that are adjacent to single family residential properties, on the west side of the West Promenade, should not exceed 36 feet in height. Townhomes are the preferred residential typology in this area of the transition zone. • All ground level space east of the West Promenade should have 20-foot floor-to-floor height. This dimension allows for flexibility to accommodate one level of retail space along the street, or two-story townhomes facing the West Promenade. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • On the east side of the West Promenade, building faces should not exceed 50’ in height. Any height above that limit should step back 20 feet from the facade of the building. • On France Avenue, a 50 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a maximum building height of 60 feet. • On individual developments, should the City choose to permit height above the 60-foot height limit, it is recommended that additional height above 60 feet step back from the face of the building by a minimum of 10 feet in depth and 12 feet in height. Street Typologies West Promenade Transition to the Cornelia Neighborhood A “Woonerf” reallocates the public right-of-way to create a place for people and plantings while accommodating slow-moving vehicles. The street is elevated so it is flush with the sidewalk, allowing for a continuous walking surface. When the street is closed for public events such as a festival, the area becomes a public plaza. The proposed building setbacks and building step-backs are intended to create a gradual transition in use and scale from the existing Cornelia Neighborhood on the west to France Avenue to the east. Between a transitional Street “Woonerf” is used as both a collector for neighborhood needs and a barrier against additional vehicular traffic flowing into the neighborhood. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. With a perpetual festival permit in place, the street becomes a venue for community events such as salsa dancing, a wine crush or a pop-up playground. Within the district it is the intention to define a series of street rooms each having their own characteristics and connections to the existing neighborhoods and other parts of the district to enhance the experience of the pedestrian creating both a sense of place and safe environment to be in. The West Promenade is intended to be a pedestrian and bicycle collector between the existing residential neighborhood. A1 Traffic Lanes 50 Foot Setback France Avenue 50 Feet West Promenade “Woonerf” (60’ wide Street) Single Family ResidenceTownhouses 36 Feet maximum 20 Foot Step Back Mixed Use Buildings 60 Feet Maximum Neighborhood Street 15 Foot Front Yard Setback60 Feet Maximum Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 22 Street Room Typology 1B West Promenade Between Parklawn and Minnesota Drive South of the zone designated as Street Room Typology 1A (where the Cornelia transition area immediately abuts single family neighborhoods), the Street Room experience shifts to respond to its changing context. It becomes one that is more commercial in nature and in concert with the expected higher intensity in the southwest quadrant the Greater Southdale District. As the West Promenade extends south into Typology 1B, it continues to serve pedestrian, vehicular and service access. Uniform building heights on each side of the West Promenade are intended to support the transition from existing multi-family housing to taller buildings at the south end of France Avenue near the gateway from 494. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 23 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 1B West Side of France Between Parklawn and Minnesota Drive Within this zone, existing buildings are more commercial in nature and do not immediately abut single family neighborhoods. This unique condition lends itself to new development along the West Promenade that is still lower in scale, without the preference for townhomes or smaller scale buildings along one edge, as in Typology 1A. The street room experience within Typology 1B will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • Building faces at the West Promenade within Typology 1B shall not exceed 50 feet in height. Any height above that limit should step back 20 feet from the facade of the building. • All street level space shall be 20 feet, floor-to-floor in height. This dimension allows for flexibility for retail space (on France) and two-story townhomes facing the West Promenade. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • Building faces on the east side of the West Promenade are intended to provide continuity in scale and experience from Street Room Typology 1A and from one side of the street to another. West Promenade“Woonerf”(60’ wide Street) 20 Foot Step Back 50 Feet 20 Foot Step Back Street TypologiesWest Promenade A2 A “Woonerf” reallocates the public right-of-way to create a place for people and plantings while accommodating slow- moving vehicles. The street is elevated so it is flush with the sidewalk, allowing for a continuous walking surface. When the street is closed for public events such as a festival, the area becomes a public plaza. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. With a perpetual festival permit in place, the street becomes a venue for community events such as salsa dancing, a wine crush or a pop-up playground. 60 Feet 105 Feet 20 Foot Step Back 2 Foot Step Back Traffic Lanes 50 Foot Setback France Avenue 60 FeetMaximum Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 24 Street Room Typology 1C East Promenade and Xerxes Avenue: Transition to Richfield Similar to the transition strategy on the west side of France Avenue, on the east side of the district, the existing Xerxes Avenue South is recast as the East Promenade to transition between the single family Richfield neighborhood to the east and the more commercially focused Greater Southdale District on the west. The general character of Xerxes is single family housing on the Richfield side and multi-family residential backed up to commercial on York Avenue. The intent of this typology is to have townhouses along the street, set back to a taller building above, creating an scale appropriate to the existing character of the street. Xerxes is bisected by Yorktown Park and Adams Hill Park, near the Southdale YMCA. When Xerxes transitions through Yorktown Park and Adams Hill Park, the street becomes more woonerf-like, without vehicular traffic. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. This typology extends along the north end of Xerxes between 65th and Highway 62 without the woonerf designation. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 25 The street room experience within Typology 1C will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • On both Xerxes Avenue north of 65th and on the East Promenade, a 15-foot “front yard” setback is required from curb to face of building. • Building faces at the East Promenade across the street from single-family homes shall not exceed 36 feet in height. Height above that limit shall step back 20 feet from the facade of the building, and shall not exceed 60 feet in height. Any further height shall step back an additional 20 feet, to a maximum height of 84 feet. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • See Street Room Typology 5 for description of dimensional characteristics of new development facing York Avenue. Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 1C East Promenade and Xerxes Avenue: Transition to Richfield Street TypologiesEast Promenade Transition to the Richfield Neighborhood The East Promenade Transition on Xerxes Avenue South is between the Richfield neighborhood to the east and the Southdale District on the west. The character of the street is bisected buy Adams Place Park that is east York Avenue and the Southdale YMCA. The general character of the Xerxes is single family housing on the Richfield side and multi-family residential backed up to commercial on York Avenue. The intent of the building step back with townhouses transition to taller building creating an scale appropriate to the existing character of the street. When Xerxes transitions to Adams Place Park the character of the street becomes more Woonerf like in without vehicular traffic. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. With a perpetual festival permit in place, the street becomes a venue for community events such as salsa dancing, a wine crush or a pop-up playground. A3 50’ height limit East Promenade Existing Neighborhood Street Single Family Residence 36 Feet 60 Feet 20 Foot Step Back 20 Foot Step Back 15 Foot Front Yard Setback 84 Feet Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 26 Street Room Typology 2 Cornelia Overlay at France Avenue As a reflection of the scale of buildings east of the West Promenade in Street Room Typology 1A, Typology 2 extends the scale of this potential new development to the east side of France Avenue from Gallagher Drive to south of 68th Street. This strategy is intended to frame the street room experience along this corridor with similarly scaled buildings that are respectful of the nearby single family neighborhoods. The goal is to establish this zone along France as a more commercially-focused corridor (rather than residential) while employing similar height buildings as on the west side of France within the Cornelia transition zone. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 27 The street room experience within Typology 2 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • On France Avenue, a 50-foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a building podium height of 60 feet. Above the 60-foot height limit, additional height should step back 10 feet from the face of the building, to a maximum height of 84 feet. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 2 Cornelia Overlay at France Avenue 84 Feet France Avenue 60 Feet Traffic Lanes50 Foot Setback 10 Foot Step Back Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 28 Street Room Typology 3 New Local Streets These new local streets, created as part of the strategy of breaking down the scale of the existing superblocks, will augment the current street network, providing new circulation options that can connect residents and visitors across the district, and support community life. Creating internal pedestrian walkways, with accommodation for bicycles and potentially cars, combined with existing public and private infrastructure, supports connections within and outside the block. The width of these new local streets, and the corresponding building form is based on the nature of the uses within the larger superblock structure. Streets can be lined with a mix of uses, including residential, commercial, or retail. They contain shady places to walk the dog or sit and have a coffee connecting to neighborhood parks, places of worship, and schools. Unique to the Greater Southdale District, some of these local streets may become linear parks between buildings, with vehicular access limited only to emergency responders. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 29 Street Typologies60’ Wide Connector Street Typical 60’ Wide Local Street (within super-blocks) 105 Feet 20 Foot Step Back 60 Feet 2 Foot Step Back 2 Way Traffic Plus Parking 12’ Sidewalk 12’ Sidewalk It is recommended that buildings above 60 feet step back a minimum of 20 feet when there is an opposing building at the street edge Podium Heights can vary The intent is to create a street that provides a access from roads that are bordered by France and York and are connected by east /west streets such as ParklawnAve, ParklawnCourt, Hazelton Road, W 70th, W 69th, W 65th. Internal street within the supper block provide interconnections between supper block connecting residents across the district north and south supporting potential for community space. By creating pedestrians walkways with existing public and private infrastructure thereby supporting connections within and outside the block. The street width is based on the nature of the uses within the larger super block structure. They can be lined with a mix of uses, including residential and retailwhile providing connectivity within a neighborhood. They contain shady places to walk the dog or sit and have a coffee connecting to neighborhood parks, places of worship, and schools. Unique to the Greater Southdale District, many of the Connector Streets may become entirely devoted to landscaping. B The street room experience within Typology 3 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • New local streets should be 60 feet in width. Those streets which carry vehicular traffic should comprise two traffic lanes with two lanes of parking or pick-up/drop-off. Sidewalks should be located on each side of these vehicular streets as illustrated in the diagram above. • Minimizing vehicular access to provide drop off, service and parking can be planned to share the vehicular needs of blocks allowing the remaining spaces between the remaining blocks to be used in a variety of ways for the benefit of the community. This “space between” buildings can be transformed into pocket parks, gardens, play areas, plazas, wetlands, and many other activities that support the health and wellbeing of the community. • Building podium heights can vary, from 36 feet up to 60 feet. • Above the 60 foot height limit, the long sides of a rectangular or “L” shaped building need to step back 20 feet from the street room facade (as illustrated in the building at left in the diagram above), and the narrow ends need to step back 2 feet from the street room facade (building at right in diagram above). This minimizes the impact of the taller building form on sunlight at the street, and provides a lower-scale building at the street, resulting in a more cohesive and comfortable pedestrian experience. The footprint on taller residential buildings should not exceed 12,000 SF, while taller commercial buildings are permitted larger footprints of up to 24,000 SF for efficient space utilization. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. Vehicular access to the buildings should be as close as possible to primary superblock streets (e.g. Typology 4 or 5). Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 3 New Local Streets Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 30 Street Room Typology 4 Primary East-West Streets These streets, including 69th Street, 70th Street, Hazelton Road, Parklawn Avenue, and West 76th Street, serve an important role within the district. These are unique streets in that they form the district’s superblocks with France and York Avenues, keeping traffic out of adjacent single family neighborhoods while connecting to the neighborhoods through the 30 foot setbacks that are landscaped to provide a pedestrian focused experience. This typology is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and consistently-scaled buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience of the single family residential neighborhoods is extended through the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 4 consists of streets that are between 110 and 125 feet wide, with two lanes of traffic in each direction, a center median and no parking. Several of these existing streets feature roundabouts. These streets provide access to parking and building services for buildings in Typology 3, as described previously. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 31 The street room experience within Typology 4 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • Within this typology, a 30 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a building podium height of 60 feet. Above the 60-foot height limit, additional height should step back 30 feet from the face of the building, to a maximum height of 105 feet. Any height about 105 feet should step back and additional 10 feet from the face of the building. • Building podiums along these streets need to maintain as closely as possible the 60-foot height limit while still adhering to the guidance of 75% of building face at the setback line to create the fundamental experience of the street room. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 4 Primary East-West Streets Existing East West Streets 60 Feet 20 Foot Step Back 30 Foot Step Back Traffic Lanes30 Foot Setback 30 Foot Setback 69thStreet, 70thStreet, Hazelton Road, ParklawnAvenue and 76th Street are unique streets to the Greater Southdale District. They form a super grid with France Avenue and York Avenue, keeping traffic out of adjacent single family neighborhoods while connecting to the neighborhoods through the 30 foot setback that are landscaped to provide a pedestrian focused experience. The streets act as collectors that provide a balance between pedestrian and vehicular circulation. Local streets and Woonerfs perpendicular to these streets will provide access to shops, galleries, restaurants, hotels, offices, and residential uses. Tree shaded benches in the streetscape will provide a place for pedestrians to rest, storm water management and bicyclists can use these streets to connect from home to small outdoor cafés and other amenities. Street TypologiesPrimary East-West Streets C Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 32 Street Room Typology 5 The Boulevards Streets that are included in this typology include the primary district boulevards such as France Avenue, York Avenue, W 66th Street and W 77th Street. In addition to being the widest streets in the district, they also currently carry a high volume of vehicular traffic. The intent of this typology is to create streets that connect the Greater Southdale District to the larger Edina community. These commercially-focused streets will reinforce the district’s unique role in serving Edina’s neighborhoods, while at the same time, recognizing that the district has a role in the broader metropolitan region—providing employment, health, retail, entertainment, and a wide range of housing options. The streets that fall into Typology 5 will have the greatest impact in conveying the overall identity of the district, with wide, multi-use streetscapes lined with a double row of trees within a consistent 50-foot setback. Medians may also be present in the boulevard streetscape to accommodate plantings and/or mass transit lines and stations. In many cases, boulevards will be adjacent to the tallest buildings in the district and will be the locations for transit stops. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 33 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 5 The Boulevards On these wide streets, a sense of scale is maintained by creating a uniform street wall of 60 feet, with taller structures stepping back from this 60-foot datum. This consistency in building heights along the street will form the edge of the street room—bridging between lower intensity and transitional areas, and the higher intensity zones within the Greater Southdale District. The street room experience within Typology 5 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • On France Avenue, a 50 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a minimum building height of 60 feet (diagram at left). Above that 60 foot height, the building face should step back two feet to create a cornice line, and can then extend to 105 feet. Above 105 feet, building faces must step back an additional 10 feet (as illustrated in diagram at right, above.) • Building podiums along these streets need to maintain as closely as possible the 60-foot height limit while still adhering to the guidance of 75% of building face at the setback line to create the fundamental experience of the street room. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • Parking and building services should not be accessed via these streets. • Incorporate 10- to 12-foot wide sidewalks that create opportunities for gathering, outdoor cafes, pavilions, etc. • Within the 50-foot setback, trees should be planted in a double row to add a strong canopy for pedestrian activity. Street Typologies Boulevards France Avenue, York Avenue, W 66th Streetand W 76th and W 77th: multi-modal thoroughfares within the Greater Southdale District. They have wide, multi-use streetscapes lined with a double row of trees. Medians may also be present in the Boulevard streetscape to accommodate plantings as well as mass transit lines and stations. In many cases, Boulevards will be adjacent to the tallest buildings in the district and will be the locations for transit stops. D A 50 feet setback is required from curb to face of building with minimum building height of 60 feet with a maximum building height of 105 feet. Any part of the building above 105 feet requires a 20 foot step back. Preferred building materials: Concrete, steel or heavy timber structural frame. 60 Feet 105 Feet 10 Foot Step Back 2Foot Step Back Traffic Lanes50 Foot Setback France AvenueFrance Avenue 60 Feet Traffic Lanes50 Foot Setback Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 34 Street Room Typology 6 Central Promenade Spine The Central Promenade Spine is intended to connect the Greater Southdale District from the west at Highway 100, extending east to the heart of Centennial Lakes and beyond to Edinborough Park. This Central Spine also extends the existing Promenade north through the Galleria and Southdale Center, and north across a future green lid over Highway 62 to Strachauer Park. The Central Promenade Spine traverses through a variety of building types, ranging from townhouses to multi-family housing, to low scale commercial/retail buildings, to mid-rise office buildings. As the physical form of buildings along this spine evolves, natural sunlight light and limited shadow will determine the experiential use of the space. Creating maximum height of 36 feet at its edges will support a mix of uses fronting the spine. Height above this 36 foot limit will step back from the building face, maximizing the program of new buildings rising along its edges without compromising the experience of walking and biking through a park- like environment Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 35 The street room experience within Typology 6 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • The 36 foot height along the Central Spine encourages a mix of uses focused on entertainment venues such as restaurants, gathering places or community-oriented facilities that provide destinations to come to and stay at. These lower-scale buildings that line the Promenade should reflect its stature as a special community amenity, with a rich variety of architectural experiences that front this park-like environment. • Above 36 feet, buildings shall step back 20 feet to the 60 foot podium height. Above 60 feet, buildings shall step back an additional 20 feet. • Buildings above the 60 foot height limit should be oriented to maximize the amount of sun on the Promenade. • Locations where Typology 6 intersects Typology 4 and 5 are critical to reinforce the idea of the linear public spine that connects this entire district. These intersections are the gateway to the Spine and should have a unique architectural response. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 6 Central Promenade Spine Street TypologiesCentral Promenade Spine The Central Promenade Spine is intended to connect the Greater Southdale District from the west at Highway 100, east to the heart of Centennial Lakes, along the existing Promenade north through The Galleria and Southdale Mall and north to Strachauer Park. The Central Promenade Spine transverses through different building types from 2 and 3 story Townhouses to 1 and 2 story commercial/retail buildings to 6 story office buildings. In imagining the future of the spine natural sunlight light and limited shadow will determine the experiential use of the space. Creating maximum height of 36 feet at its edges support a mix of uses fronting the spine while not limiting additional height to maximize the program of new building rising along its edges will not compromise the experience of walking and biking through a park like environment 50’ height limit Central Promenade Spine 36 Feet 60 Feet 20 Foot Step Back 20 Foot Step Back 105 Foot Maximum 15 Foot Front Yard Setback E Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 36 5 Implementing and Measuring the Guidance Ten Things to Remember Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 37 1. Every new development begins with the 200’ x 200’ block, or some variation based on context. 2. Every block or building in a development will need streets to connect between buildings. Not all of these streets will need to accommodate vehicles, providing the opportunity for parks, plazas or courtyards—important parts of the public realm. 3. Buildings will not be greater than 200 feet in length, thereby minimizing the negative impact continuous walls can have on a comfortable pedestrian experience. 4. All streets are not equal. The plan outlines a hierarchy that is driven by the kind of experiences that are expected on these streets and how they facilitate an enlivened public realm. 5. Designated transition zones are about maintaining the quality of life in these areas without restricting growth in other parts of the district. 6. Promenades and East-West Streets are the bridge between single family neighborhoods, such as the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina and the west side of Richfield, to more intense parts of the district. 7. Street Rooms will intersect and overlap each other in many circumstances. At these intersections, lower building heights should prevail, giving the smaller scaled building precedence over larger scale buildings. 8. Building footprints above 60 feet in height are limited to 12,000 SF for residential uses, and 24,000 SF for commercial. 9. Within the first 60 vertical feet of a building, primary materials systems that are more traditional like brick, stone, glass wall systems are preferred. Above 60 feet, other materials such as metal wall systems within a larger curtainwall system, can be introduced. These baseline parameters should not be a deterrent to architectural innovation but rather are intended to serve as a measure of quality and continuity throughout the district 10. Transparency at the ground level facing the public realm is key to the individual experience and is a catalyst for how to activate and maintain a community-based approach to daily life and experience. 5. Implementing and Measuring the Guidance Ten Things to Remember MINA' A _ < O RESOLUTION NO. 2023-11 APPROVING A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND REVISED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FINAL REZONING, SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT (SIPA) AND FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR PHASE 1 7250 AND 7200 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section I. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Orion Investment is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for a completely new redevelopment project for the subject property. This site received a rezoning approval to Planned Unit Development-I6 in 2019; however, the project was never constructed. The underlying, or previous zoning on the site is POD, Planned Office District. The existing PUD would allow two six-story buildings with 299 unit of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants and 10 owner occupied townhomes. The previous POD, Planned Office District would allow 113,000 square feet of office/medical office use. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 44, Block I, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. The North 325 Feet of the East 520 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Except Road. (7200 & 7250 France. 1.03 The existing office buildings and parking ramp on the sites would be removed. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. The project would be developed in two phases. The first phase would be the construction of a five-story 124,620 square foot office building and coffee shop with underground parking at the 7250 France Site. The 7200 site would include a ponding area, sidewalks, green space, landscaping and surface parking where the future building pad would be. 1.04 Phase 2 would include a similar sized building in height and square footage, with the future use of housing or hotel (150 units/rooms) with or without retail. Permanent parking for Phase I would be required to be included in the Phase 2 development. 1.05 An Overall Development and Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD-I6 District were approved by the City Council on April 2', 2019. 1.06 To accommodate the request, the following is requested: â A Rezoning/Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District to establish a new Overall Development Plan and Site Plan review for Phase I. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-11 Page 2 1.07 On September 14, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the request with the added condition that the bike and pedestrian connections be separated from the north/south street/connector. Vote: 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.08 On September 20th, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. 1.09 On October 18, 2022, the City Council granted preliminary approval of the requests. 1.10 On January 10, 2023 the applicant submitted revised plans. 1.11 On February 7, 2023, the City Council granted final approval including the SIPA for Phase I. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: I. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal still meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high-quality architectural brick, metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed in Phase I would be the only buildings built on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Phase 2 would be required to be multi-family residential or hospitality with possibly some retail commercial as long as there is adequate parking on the site for all phases. d. If housing is constructed in Phase 2, the project would add to the City's affordable housing stock by providing 10% of the units for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. g. Meet the City's sustainability policy, including seeking a LEED certified building in Phase I. h. Provide 19% of the site for public use. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The plans address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines as follows: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and connections through the site both east-west and north- south; increasing the public realm on the site; eliminating most of the surface parking stalls, with none being visible from France Avenue in the Phase 2 build out. If housing on RESOLUTION NO. 2023-11 Page 3 Phase 2 is constructed, affordable housing should be required within the future apartment project. Public art will be located along France Avenue and the connecting plaza. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: â Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including "big box" retail). â Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. â Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. â Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. â Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. â Provision of the north-south public vehicle, bike and pedestrian connection through the site. â Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change. â Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. â Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. â Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region. â Ensure that the city's roads continue to evolve to act as connectors, rather than as barriers. Incorporate amenities and infrastructure into public corridors to make them beautiful, efficient, and multimodal public spaces that contribute to community identity and pride. â 50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use. 6. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Stantec conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The revised plans are consistent with the Preliminary Plans and meet the conditions required at Preliminary approval. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-11 Page 4 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, grants final approval of the Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan, SIPA and Site Plan for Phase I. Approval is subject to the following conditions: I. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 2. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 4. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. A Developer's Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 7. If Phase 2 of the project includes a housing project, it must be compliant with the City's affordable housing policy. Final determination to be made at final approval for Phase 2. 8. Phase 2 retail, housing or hotel uses must have entrances on the two street frontages, 72' Street and France Avenue. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated September 1, 2022. 10. Compliance with the Stantec Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Public sidewalks must be a minimum of 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard on Gallagher Drive and West 72nd Street, and 8 feet minimum width with an 8-foot boulevard on France Avenue. 13. Dedication of public access easements of the east-west and north-south sidewalks and drive- aisles through the site and sidewalks around the perimeter of the site. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-1 I Page 5 14. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 15. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 16. The property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of internal sidewalks and drive aisles. The City would snow plow a 5-foot path of the sidewalk on France. The property owners would be responsible for the remaining areas. 17. Public art should be provided along street frontages and the courtyard/plaza valued at, at least $100,000. 18. Final Plans shall comply with the street typologies in the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines along France Avenue and the building step in at least ten feet at the 60-foot building height. 19. The bike and pedestrian connections be separated from the north/south street/connector on the west side of the proposed buildings. 20. The building height for phase 2 shall be limited to 6 stories and 72 feet tall to the roof line, including a ceiling height requirement of 16 feet on the main level. 21. The existing trees along the west lot line shall be preserved to provide screening from the residential homes to the west. If they do not survive, additional trees shall be planted in the area to provide screening at a variety of species and sizes, subject to approval of the City Forester. 22. Landscaping shall be added on the west side of the surface parking lot at a sufficient height to screen vehicles from the residential property to the west. The retaining walls shall be planted with vines or vegetation to cover the concrete walls. 23. Vegetation within the retention pond must be planted and maintained to the satisfaction of city staff. aro Allis , City Clerk ames B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-11 Page 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on February 7, 2023. CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 7, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1— day of i 2023. 11111 !ew 4111 Sharon A Prison, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2022-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-I6, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-I6 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section I. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-I6 (PUD-16) (a) Legal description: Lot 44, Block I, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. The North 325 Feet of the East 520 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Except Road. (7200 & 7250 France Avenue) (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January I 0, 2023 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2023-11 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Townhomes/Condos. Hotel (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD-2 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front — France 39 feet Front — Gallagher 20 fcct 25 feet Front — 72nd Street (apartments) 35 feet Front — 72nd Street (townhomes) 20 feet Side — West (town homes) 90 feet Side — West (apartments) 45 feet Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — )(XXX Added text — XXXX Building Height Phase I — 76 feet with a ceiling height of 20 feet on the main level Phase 2 — 67 fcct 72 feet with a ceiling height of 16 feet on the main level (Building to be constructed per the approved plans) Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.8% Parking Stalls 590 stalls required (Per the approved plans) Phase I — 317 total stalls Phase 2 — 468 total stalls Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD Zoning District based on the use. (h) Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units in the building shall be dedicated for affordable housing at 60% or less of area median gross income, for a minimum of 25 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. (h) For any housing development; affordable housing units must be included in the project per the City's affordable housing policy at the time of final approval. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon second reading of the Ordinance. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text XXXX Added text — XXXX First Reading: Second Reading: February 7, 2023 Published: Attest: 4111./P i // r Sha on Allison, ity Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send one affidavit of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Appoint Council Member Risser to Represent the City on the Noise Oversight Committee Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Appoint Council Member Julie Risser to represent the City of Edina on the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Noise Oversight Committee. INTRODUCTION: The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) serves an important accountability and liaison function among the MAC, airlines, FAA and the public around the subject of aviation noise. Meetings take place every other month on the third Wednesday at the MAC General Office in Minneapolis. The City’s current representative on the NOC is former City Council Member Mary Brindle. Terms are two years in length. Representatives to the NOC are appointed by their respective City Councils or organizations. Mary’s term expires in June 2023. She does not wish to be reappointed. Council Member Risser has expressed an interest in serving as the City’s NOC representative. I have discussed the assignment with her. She attended the aviation policy roundtable at the National League of Cities conference in Washington, D.C., last week. I think her interest, preparation and time availability makes her a good candidate for this assignment and I recommend the Council approve her appointment. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Heritage Preservation Commission, Jan. 9 and Feb. 13, 2023 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes of the Heritage Preservation Commission for Jan. 9 and Feb. 13, 2023. ATTACHMENTS: Description January 9, 2023, HPC Minutes February 13, 2023, HPC Minutes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 2/13/23 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, January 9, 2023 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Schilling, Commissioners Cundy, Everson, Nymo, Hassenstab, Pollock, Kmetz-Sheehy, and student member Varadhan and Maheshwari. Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Kmetz-Sheehy, to approve the meeting agenda moving item C under Reports/Recommendations to item A. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Cundy, seconded Nymo, to approve the December 13, 2022, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. H-23-1: 4909 Bruce Avenue- New Detached Garage Liaison Bodeker gave background information on the house and the COA request made for the new detached garage that was denied by the Commission in December. The homeowner gave overview of changes that were made to the COA from the original COA request from December. Commissioners Nymo and Cundy discussed that both designs would be outliers to the aesthetic of the neighborhood, specifically the roof form. The Commission discussed the height of the dormers, roof form, and consistency and asked questions of staff relating to Robert Vogel’s opinion on the requested COA. Commissioner Hassenstab recommended a design review session to review and determine sketch plans. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 2/13/23 Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Hassenstab, to continue this COA to February’s agenda. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. H-19-3: 4604 Browndale Ave COA Amendment Liaison Bodeker updated on the COA request that was approved by the Commission in May 2019 and explained the amendment to the original COA. The Commission discussed the As-Built elevations of the property and asked questions of staff relating to open permits, façade, and rubric. Commissioner Cundy discussed precedents in place to uphold COA requests. Motion made by Kmetz-Sheehy, seconded by Pollock, to approve the COA amendment as submitted. Commissioners Everson, Hassenstab, Pollock, and Kmetz-Sheehy voted aye. Commissioner Cundy and Schilling voted nay. Commissioner Nymo abstained. The motion carried. C. H-20-8: 4510 Sunnyside Road COA Amendment Liaison Bodeker gave an update on the property and the existing COA that was approved by the Commission in October 2020. Liaison Bodeker updated that the as-built elevations do not match the approved elevations from the original COA. Motion made by Nymo, seconded by Kmetz-Sheehy, to approve the COA amendment as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. D. H-20-6: 4630 Drexel Ave COA Amendment Liaison Bodeker gave background information on the property and the COA request that was approved by the Commission in September 2020. Liaison Bodeker updated that there were complaints received concerning garage doors, stonework, and reconstruction of the chimney at the final inspection. The Commission discussed materiality, street-facing façade, stonework on the chimney and asked questions of staff relating to why the stonework not included, Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Hassenstab, to deny the COA amendment as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. VII. Chair and Member Comments: Chair Shilling discussed conversations with St. Steven’s Church concerning landmark designation. VIII. Staff Comments: Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 2/13/23 Liaison Bodeker stated that there are 3 volunteers needed for City Code and Plan of Treatment Work Plan sub-committee. Commissioner Lonnquist would like to stay on the sub-committee. Commissioner Pollock and Cundy volunteered to join sub-committee. Liaison Bodeker updated that the next HPC meeting will take place on Monday, February 13, 2023, at 7:00pm. IX. Adjournment Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Hassenstab, to adjourn the meeting at 9:37 pm. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 3/14/23 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, February 13, 2023 I. Call to Order Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Schilling, Commissioners Cundy, Everson, Pollock, Lonnquist and student member Varadhan. Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Lonnquist, seconded by Cundy, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Pollock, seconded Everson, to approve the January 9, 2023, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentation A. Sketch Review: 4909 Bruce Ave-Garage Architect, Mike Eckardt, updated on the modifications made to the plans based on the discussion and recommendations from the Commission. Commission gave feedback and discussed the sketch. B. Sketch Review: 4904 Arden Ave Architect, Paul Hannan, introduced the project and gave an overview of the background of the home. Commission gave feedback on the pillars, garage, big picture window, and scale. VI. Community Comment: Carolyn Jackson, City Council Commissioner, thanked the Commission for the work being done by the HPC. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2023 Chair and Vice Chair Elections Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 3/14/23 Chair Schilling updated that Vice Chair Nymo has served 6 years and Chair Schilling has served 3 years, both reaching their term limit. Chair Schilling stated that both positions are up for election. Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Pollock, to nominate Commissioner Lonnquist as Chair. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion made by Schilling, seconded by Cundy, to nominate Commissioner Everson as Vice-Chair. All voted aye. The motion carried. VIII. Chair and Member Comments: Chair Shilling updated on the interviews conducted for the 3 open seats on the Commission. Commissioner Lonnquist updated that the Rotary would like to partner with the HPC. Commissioner Lonnquist asked a question regarding the voting for the Heritage Preservation Award. IX. Staff Comments: Liaison Bodeker updated the HPC that the finalized Work Plan is now posted to the website. Liaison Bodeker updated on the 4633 Arden project. Liaison Bodeker updated that the Heritage Preservation Consultant, Robert Vogel, is stepping back from the position. Applications for filling the position will be open to anyone with qualifications. Liaison Bodeker updated that the 4630 Drexel project has been appealed and the public hearing will be held at City Council on March 7th. The decision date is March 21st. X. Adjournment Motion made by Pollock, seconded by Everson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:12 pm. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, Feb. 9, 2023 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the February 9, 2023 minutes of the Energy & Environment Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description EEC Minutes: February 9, 2023 Agenda Energy and Environment Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall - Community Room Meeting will take place in person. Masks are optional. Thursday, February 9, 2023 7:00 PM I.Call To Order Chair Martinez called the meeting to order at 7:01pm. II.Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Martinez, Vice Chair Horan, Commissioners Haugen, Lukens, Tessman, and Student Commissioner Machart. Late: Commissioner Dakane, 7:30pm Absent: Commissioners Schima, Lanzas, Hovanec and Student Commissioner Rawat III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Cory Lukens to Approve Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission January 12, 2023 Motion by John Haugen to Approve Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Hilda Martinez Salgado. Motion Carried. V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Special Presentation: MetroBlooms/Blue Thumb The EEC received a special recorded presentation from MetroBlooms and BlueThumb regarding the resources and program offerings they have for Edina residents interested in sustainable lawncare. B.Special Presentation: Organic Lawns by Lunseth The EEC received a special presentation from Shay Lunseth, with Lunseth Organic Lawncare. Ms. Lunseth shared tips to help residents participating in No Mow May to expand their sustainable lawncare practices. VI.Community Comment No Community Comment was received in person, or discussed by the EEC. During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.Annual Chair/Vice Chair Nomination & Selection Chair Martinez nominated Commissioner Lukens for Vice Chair Commissioner Haugen nominated Chair Martinez to continue her service as Chair Chair Martinez and Commissioner Lukens were elected as Chair and Vice Chair, selectively. Motion by John Haugen to Elect 2023 Chair and Vice Chair. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. VIII.Chair And Member Comments Chair Martinez recognized Vice Chair Horan's 7-year service, and her accomplishments. The Commission shared their appreciation. Commissioner Lukens debriefed on the Green Golf event, including taking some learnings from one golf course and connecting with other courses to help with learnings. Commissioner Lukens mentioned new recognized business, Paragon Pilates, and confirmed City will issue press release at later date. Vice Chair Horan shared that Council approved EEC's recommendation for carryout bags. Commissioner Dakane, Chair Martinez and Commissioner Hovanec will co-lead the new work plan initiative to "Partner with City staff to implement an awareness and outreach plan to inform residents and businesses of merchant bag fee requirement. Gather stakeholder input in early 2023 to inform ordinance development, once passed the EEC will contribute to a promotional campaign to raise awareness and support businesses to integrate the new requirement ahead of 2024 effective date." Commissioner Haugen asked about organized trash collection progress. Manager Hancock reported that no action had been taken by Council or City leadership yet but would research the status and share back with the EEC. IX.Staff Comments Staff shared the following updates: The Climate Action Fund has been updated with new 2023 cost-share amounts. The March 1 State of Community will have a sustainability focus - EEC members are invited to table to promote the Green Business Outreach Program. The Sustainability Specialist position recruitment will have final interviews on Feb. 17. X.Adjournment The EEC meeting was adjourned at 9:00pm. Motion by Michelle Horan to Adjourn. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. T he City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Transportation Commission, Feb. 16, 2023 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive minutes of the Transportation Commission from February 16, 2023. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Transportation Commission, February 16, 2023 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: March 16, 2023 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room February 16, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Ahler, Brown, Lewis, Plumb-Smith, Rubenstein, Sweeney, Johnson Late: Commissioner Kitui, McCarthy, Kanti Mahanty Absent: Commissioner Richman Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Plumb-Smith and seconded by Commissioner Ahler to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Rubenstein and seconded by Commissioner Lewis to approve the January 19, 2023 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Presentations/Recognitions A. Special Recognition – Commissioners Ahler and Richman Commissioners and staff thanked Commissioners Ahler and Richman for their six years of service on the Commission. Commissioner McCarthy arrived at 6:02. VI. Community Comment Aimee Martinez, 4200 Oakdale Avenue, testified about Item B6 in the Traffic Safety Report of January 31, 2023. Martinez previously testified about this issue at the December 15, 2022 Transportation Commission meeting, noting that the intersection is offset, many drivers do not stop for the stop signs, and that there are many kids and dogs in the area. Martinez raised a concern that the City’s data doesn’t reflect reality and that private videos observed a higher rate of non-compliance. Additional treatments to the stop signs were requested. Commissioner McCarthy left at 6:15. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: March 16, 2023 VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Traffic Safety Report of January 31, 2023 The Commission reviewed and commented on the Traffic Safety Report of January 31, 2023. Item B2: Crosswalk request over W 50th St at Arden Ave Motion was made by Commissioner Lewis and seconded by Commissioner Rubenstein to request that staff provide data on the date and time of the crossing study, as well as information related to the rectangular rapid flashing beacon at W 50th St and Eden Ave. All voted aye. Motion carried. Item B4: Request for crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Brookside Ave Motion was made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Brown to recommend that staff analyze the issue again and come up with options other than a crosswalk. All voted aye. Motion carried. Item B6: Request to improve stop compliance at W 42nd St and Oakdale Ave/Monterey Ave Motion was made by Commissioner McCarthy and seconded by Commissioner Ahler to recommend that staff collect more data on stop sign compliance in both directions at the intersection and report back with recommendations. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioner McCarthy returned at 6:25. Commissioner Kanti Mahanty arrived at 6:55. Commissioner Kitui arrived at 6:57. B. 2023 Work Plan Updates #1 Pedestrian Crossing Policy Review – Starting to review policy, resources provided by staff and case studies from other communities. #2 Bicycle Network Planning for Bikes and Transportation – Subcommittee will connect with Hennepin County staff on gaps in their system and timeline for improvements. #3 France Avenue Corridor Review – Subcommittee has started a base drawing, highlighting sidewalks, crosswalks, driveways and signage. Requested Richfield contacts from staff to get more information on recent W 66th St reconstruction project. #4 Boulevard Tree Planting – Planning to meet with City Forester in spring. #5 Cahill Small Area Plan – No update. #6 Parking – No update. C. Annual Elections Commissioner Plumb-Smith nominated Commissioner Lewis as Chair. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioner McCarthy nominated Commissioner Brown as Vice Chair. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rubenstein. All voted aye. Motion carried. VIII. Chair and Member Comments – Received. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: March 16, 2023 IX. Staff Comments – Received. X. Adjournment Motion was made by Commissioner Lewis and seconded by Commissioner Ahler to adjourn the February 16, 2023 regular meeting at 7:32 p.m. All voted aye. Motion carried. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 2 SEAT NAME 1 Ahler, Mindy 1 1 2 100% 2 Rubenstein, Tricia 1 1 2 100% 3 Richman, Lori 0 0% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 2 100% 5 Johnson, Kirk 1 1 2 100% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 2 100% 7 Kitui, Janet 1 1 50% 8 McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 2 100% 9 Plumb-Smith, Jill 1 1 2 100% 10 Kanti Mahanty, Stephen (s) 1 1 2 100% 11 Sweeney, Isaiah (s) 1 1 2 100% Date: April 4, 2023 Agenda Item #: XI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Prep Memo Apr. 4, 2023 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Prep Memo for Apr. 4, 2023 From: Lisa Schaefer <LSchaefer@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 3:28 PM To: City Council <citycouncil@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Council Meeting Prep Importance: High Good afternoon: Following is additional information and questions I have received from Council for the meeting tonight. Please review the notes regarding Council Comment at the end of this email. This will be a late meeting. Estimated adjournment is 12:45 am. WORK SESSION The Work Session is a Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission, and there are two items. 1. Planning Commission Recommendations for Development Review Process. Staff will provide a brief review of legal requirements and past council discussions, then the Planning Commission will be present their recommendations. 2. Regular Annual Joint Meeting with Planning Commission. Planning commission will review progress on their work plan. COMMUNITY COMMENTS • Janet Kitui was the only community comment. Council Members individually responded at the last meeting and the Mayor and Council Member Jackson offered to meet with Ms. Kitui to discuss her concerns in more detail. CONSENT AGENDA I have received no questions or requests to pull items off of consent. I do not plan to have additional staff available in attendance for these items. I won’t have further comments on this tonight. PUBLIC HEARINGS & REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS 4404 Valley View – VIII C. Public Hearing & IX C. 4404 Valley View Subdivision Background: • The Conditional Use Permit has already been granted for 4 units. The Site Plan and Variances were also approved for the 4 units. • A question was raised as to whether or not the CUP was inconsistent with Zoning Code. • Attorney Kendall indicated CUP was legally defensible, but offered re-zoning as an option if Council wanted to address the ambiguity. • If the Council chooses not to approve the rezoning, o the Council must still act on Item IX B, and approve the Subdivision if the Council finds it meets the requirements. • If zoning is not approved, o Conditional Use permit already granted, Site Plan and variances were already approved for 4 units. So the project could still be built as originally approved. Questions Received 1. The CUP approved in 2018 was for a different project. How does the CUP apply to this current project. While it is true that the original CUP had a different site plan �ed to it. That original site plan was revised in 2022 with the new site plan approvals and new variances. Condi�onal use permits run with the land, so there was no need for a new condi�onal use permit with the 2022 approvals…just the revised site plan and variances. 2. How many public hearings have been held on this proposal at both the Planning Commission and City Council level? A�er tonight’s public hearing there will have been 6 public hearings on this request. (3 at planning commission and 3 at city council.) Two public hearing were held last summer when the site plan and variances were approved for the 4 rowhomes. There were two public hearings for the subdivision on February 8 and February 21. The planning commission held a public hearing on the rezoning last week, and the council will hold another tonight. 3. How long ago this proposal first came to the city as a sketch plan? The sketch plan was considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in March of 2022. 4. How the Planning Commission and the City Council voted as to whether it complies with the Wooddale Small Area Plan? There was no formal vote taken on the consistency with the comprehensive plan. No Comprehensive Plan Amendment was needed. Part of the findings however in the 2022 Site Plan Approval found that the density was consistent with the comprehensive plan. 5. Does rezoning this parcel to PUD cons�tute spot-zoning? No. The use (multiresidential) is permitted by CUP in the underlying district. Multiresidential is defined as a double dwelling unit building and residential townhome (below is the city code definition). A double dwelling unit or residential townhome is not intended to have commercial use. The buildings will be double dwelling units. Multiresidential use means a residential use permitted in the Planned Residence District and the Mixed Development District. Sec. 36-522. - Principal uses. The principal uses in the Planned Resident Districts (PRD, PSR) are as follows:(1) PRD-1. Single dwelling unit buildings, double dwelling unit buildings and residential townhouses. PRD-2. Residential buildings containing six or fewer dwelling units. (3)PRD-3 and PRD-4. All residential buildings, also day care facilities licensed by the state. The comprehensive plan (small area plan for this area) specifically states that residential is considered a primary use. Additionally Plan states that “sites should be allowed to transition to housing from business use in response to the changing market demands.” Additionally, the SAP specifically refers to this site as follows: “Flexible Evolution of Land Uses. Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to the market. Although the proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014, the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change. The commercial site north of Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS 1. Verbal Report regarding NLC. The Elected Official Travel Policy passed by City Council says, “Council Members will make a verbal report concerning the results of the travel at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council.” This can be a short statement about what you did while you were there, and any benefits/insights you want to share. Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager 952-826-0416 | Fax 952-826-0405 LSchaefer@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov