The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2023-05-24 Planning Commission Special Work SessionAg enda Planning Commission Work Session City of E dina, Minnesota City H all, Mayor's Conference R oom Wednesday, May 24, 2023 5:30 PM I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Ca h ill District Area Plan IV.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli"cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: May 24, 2023 Agenda Item #: I I I. To:P lanning C ommission Work S es s ion Item Type: O ther F rom:Addis on Lewis, C ommunity Development C oordinator Item Activity: Subject:C ahill Dis tric t Area P lan Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. D iscussion only. I N TR O D U C TI O N: A draft of the Cahill District Area P lan has been completed and posted for public review and comment on B etter Together E dina. M embers of the project team will provide an overview of the draft to the P lanning C ommission. T he plan, along with associated Comprehensive P lan amendments, will be formally considered at the J une 28 meeting. T his work session will be an opportunity to preview the plan and ask questions of the project team. C opies of the draft plan and proposed C omprehensive P lan amendments are attached for review. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Cahill Dis trict Area Plan - Part 1 Draft Cahill Dis trict Area Plan - Part 2 Draft Cahill Dis trict Area Plan - Part 3 Draft Cahill Dis trict Area Plan - Part 4 Associated Comprehens ive Plan Amendments CAHILL DISTRICT AREA PLAN DRAFT MAY 8, 2023 Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 2 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ..................................................60 Implementation Matrix ...............................................................................................62 APPENDICES ........................................................................74 Appendix A - Business Community and Developer Engagement Report Appendix B - Biko Transportation Existing Conditions Memo Appendix C - Stormwater Planning-Level Cost Analysis Appendix D - Development Yield Assumptions Tables CONTENTS PLAN OVERVIEW .................................................................4 DISTRICT PROFILE ..............................................................9 Demographics ...............................................................................................................10 Land Use and Built Form ............................................................................................12 Transportation ..............................................................................................................14 Economic Conditions ..................................................................................................19 Utilities ...........................................................................................................................20 CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVES ...................................22 Managing Change .........................................................................................................23 Concept Development ...............................................................................................24 Scenario Development Process ................................................................................25 Scenario Evaluation ......................................................................................................27 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ...............................................28 Concept Description ..................................................................................................29 Overall Plan and Composition ..................................................................................33 Land Use and Subareas ...............................................................................................34 Jobs and Residential Yields .........................................................................................41 PUBLIC REALM PLAN ........................................................42 Public Realm Framework ...........................................................................................43 Public ROW - Street Network .................................................................................44 Public ROW - Stormwater ........................................................................................45 Quasi-Public Space .......................................................................................................46 Private but Publicly Visible Space ..............................................................................47 Public Realm Plan For The Cahill District ...............................................................48 Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The City of Edina would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions in the development of the Cahill Area District Plan. Special thanks to Hennepin County for partially funding this project with a Hennepin Planning Grant. CONSULTING TEAM MEMBERS BOLTON & MENK, INC. Haila Maze, AICP Andrew Dresdner, AICP Mike Thompson, AICP Sarah Lloyd, PE Tim Olson, PE, CFM BIKO ASSOCIATES, INC. Bill Smith, AICP Dan Lubben ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. Janna King, CEcD, EDFP PLANNING COMMISSION Jimmy Bennett, Chair Gerard Strauss, Vice-Chair Louis Miranda, Secretary William Bornstein Ryan Daye Meriwether Felt Shayaan Gandhi Sarah Hu Lori Olson Bonnie Padilla Quincy Smith CITY STAFF PLANNING Cary Teague, Community Development Director Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner ENGINEERING Chad Millner, Director of Engineering Ross Bintner, Engineering Services Manager ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager CITY COUNCIL Mayor James Hovland Kate Agnew, Council Member Carolyn Jackson, Council Member James Pierce, Council Member Julie Risser, Council Member Ron Anderson, former Council Member Kevin Staunton, former Council Member WORKING GROUP David Alkire, Chair Ryan Breisach Louis DeMars Jamie Glover Sarah Hu Janet Kitui Hilda Martinez Salgado Michael Morgan Michael Schroeder Anne Snyder Steve Troskey PLAN OVERVIEWPLAN OVERVIEW Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 5 PLAN OVERVIEWPURPOSE OF PLAN The purpose of this plan is to chart a course for the continued evolution of the Cahill District in Edina. This area was developed over 50 years ago. It is now aging, becoming partially obsolete, and in need of new direction so that it can continue to prosper and live up to its potential. Residents, property owners, businesses, community leaders, developers, and others see visions of what this area can become. With the right alignment of policy, resources, and will, nearly anything is possible. At the same time, there is a great deal of embodied value in existing uses within the area that should not be lost in the transition. Particular to the nature of urban industrial districts, it is also a scare resource, which could well be lost forever if it is transitioned. Also, the cost of progress is not free, and newer development visions need to be evaluated against both the benefits and impacts to the Edina community – especially the immediate surrounding area. The tension between past and future in this district has played out over the course of the study. Conversations moved fluidly from high design concepts for transformational development, to deep concerns about whether the city’s infrastructure and institutions could handle what they will bring. The result is a plan that attempts to strike a balance between maintaining the value of what is already here, and allowing for evolution to what is next. This section briefly describes the path to this point, and charts the course forward. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 6 PLAN OVERVIEWTHE FUTURE The City of Edina already has a track record of innovation in redevelopment. For instance, Southdale Mall and Centennial Lakes broke ground in terms of new models for commercial development. Unsurprisingly, there are high aspirations for what is possible in the Cahill district as well. Several ideas have been proposed over the years, including ambitious plans for full redevelopment of the area. Ideas include more attractive and connected public spaces, high value redevelopment that grows the tax base, more focus on community- serving uses, increased sustainability and resilience in the built environment, and innovation in the evolving nature of workplaces. This story is somewhat similar in urban industrial districts in cities nationwide. Older models for how industrial and office parks were developed are becoming obsolete. At the same time, the great location of many of these sites makes them attractive to many other users, as well as ripe for redevelopment. City leaders are faced with a choice: try to maintain the essential functions that these districts have provided for decades, or allow them to transition to something new. This isn’t an easy or simple choice. However, given the size of the district, there is an option to allow for multiple futures, by envisioning this as a series of connected subdistricts. Likewise, there is an opportunity to further multiple city goals in alignment with the high standards Edina sets for itself – around innovation, sustainability, education, livability, and prosperity. THE PRESENT Since its original development, the district has remained an employment center for the city and the region. Today, it is home to over 200 businesses and 4,000 employees. However, the building stock is aging, and renovations and upgrades have been limited. As properties in the district become less competitive for some tenants, others have moved to take their place, changing the business composition and character of the area. Increasingly, the district has seemed underutilized, especially given its premium location. Due to the transitional nature of this area, for the last 15+ years, the City has designated it as an area of change in its comprehensive plans. This reflects the need for more in-depth study of the area to determine its future directions. It also suggests that this is one of the key areas of the city where it has the potential to accommodate future planned growth in terms of jobs and/or households. As part of the effort associated with the most recent comprehensive plan update, the City completed a plan for the 70th & Cahill Neighborhood Node in January 2019. One outcome of that plan was identifying the need to further study the entire Cahill industrial area as a potential area of change. The City has also received several redevelopment proposals within the district. However, development options at present are limited by both policy and infrastructure constraints. Recent analysis shows that a major investment in public infrastructure (both sewer and stormwater) will be needed to accommodate future growth here. THE PAST The Cahill Industrial District was deliberately and purposefully built. Back in the early 1960s, Edina had no industrial district – or even industrial zoning to allow for it to happen. Meanwhile, with the construction of the interstate system and the development of industrial in nearby communities, city leaders were concerned they would miss out on significant economic gains if Edina was not able to accommodate such uses. The location was chosen based on proximity to the interstate as well as a determination that the soft soils of this former wetlands area are less suitable for residential. The city took a year to conduct a study and come up with a plan for industrial zoning. This resulted in the subsequent development of office/industrial uses along the I-494 corridor. The development of the Cahill industrial area began with the purchase of a former farm/wetlands site by Antonio Bernardi’s Metro US Corp in 1963, followed by rapid expansion in the late 1960s and early 1970s. In the initial build-out, major tenants included General Motors, Control Data, General Electric, DuPont, and others. When the Cahill industrial area developed, it was carefully designed to be separated from surrounding uses, to overcome concerns about locating industrial close to single family residential. This included a disconnected roadway system, planted screening along Normandale Rd (now Highway 100), and buffering uses on all three Edina sides: multifamily to the north and west, and office uses to the east. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 7 PLAN OVERVIEWMile Creek Watershed District, Metro Transit, Three Rivers Park District, Edina Public Schools District, and various others. At the third and final public workshop, the focus was on converging around a preferred development alternative, to form the basis for the plan’s recommendations. Attendees provided feedback on a series of development scenarios, as well as their priorities for how success in the district should be measured. While input was broad, a significant proportion voiced support for a more jobs-focused scenario, as well as a desire to ensure community impacts were fully accounted for. The primary outcome of this workshop was the to provide the working group input to inform the selection of a jobs- focused alternative and to refine the impact analysis. [INSERT RESULTS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL REVIEW WHEN AVAILABLE] THE PROCESS The direction for the Cahill district plan is rooted in a commitment to listen to the community, both in general and in terms of the stakeholders most impacted. Consequently, the planning process was initiated in November 2021 with the first of three public workshops. Attendees engaged in discussion about both existing conditions and their visions for what the area can be. Input included big ideas around being a national model for regenerating a community, with ideas related to sustainability goals, promoting innovation, and incorporating family-friendly features. The primary outcome of this workshop was the formation of goals and principles to guide the plan’s development. Around this time a representative working group of 12 members, including two co-chairing planning commissioners, was convened to guide the planning process, provide feedback on draft plan content, and advise on community engagement. By Spring 2022, the City had retained a consultant team to provide support. This group met 13 times during the planning process, up until the completion of a draft to be forwarded to planning commission for review. After the initial visioning workshop and exploration of existing conditions and goals with the working group, the City held a second public workshop. Attendees worked through exercises to determine both the important functions of the district and what mix of use and activities belong there. The result included ideas for mixed use development scenarios including spaces for working, living, and recreating. The primary outcome of this workshop was the formation of a series of development scenarios for analysis and consideration. In addition to general public input, consultant and City staff conducted targeted outreach to both businesses and property owners within the district, as well as potential developers who have an interest in developing in the district. They provided feedback on their current and future plans, as well as what development would be market feasible. The primary outcome of this outreach was to provide the working group input to refine scenarios and future land uses based on market considerations. Alongside the public process, consultant and City staff provided support on analysis of existing and future considerations. This included exploration of constraints, needs, and opportunities for land use, infrastructure, and public realm. This included review of prior studies and consultation with outside agencies, including the Nine PRINCIPLES, GOALS, AND ASPIRATIONS Through the plan formation process, three primary principles were defined as desired outcomes for the development of the area. (See table on following page for description.) For each of these, there are a series of more specific goals. The concept development and recommendations forwarded through this process have been designed to advance these goals. They represent achievable outcomes that can be promoted through planned improvements in the district. While they are not guaranteed, the plan can map out a course to get there. But those involved in the plan’s development had higher aims than this. Over and above these goals are a series of related aspirations. These are much less certain, as they envision something beyond an incremental step forward – but rather a leap towards something new and innovative. The implementers are mostly likely not yet fully at the table, resources are still to be identified, and some ideas still need to be further developed. Regardless, the intent is to set the stage for ambitious ideas to advance, as time and opportunity allow. PLAN OUTLINE This planning document is composed of the following sections: • Introduction and Overview: background on the study area, planning process, and goals and aspirations. • Current Area Profile and Trend Analysis: information on existing policy, physical, and economic conditions in the district, including assessment of issues and trends impacting the area • Development and Evaluation of Alternatives: discussion of the process of managing change, process of developing and evaluating concepts, and criteria for reviewing alternatives • Preferred Alternative and Final Plan: description of the preferred alternative and its primary components, as well as considerations for implementation • Public Realm and Connectivity Framework: provides complementary analysis and directions for public realm and connectivity improvements to leverage and enhance the planned development. • Implementation Plan: recommendations for the policy and regulatory guidance, infrastructure improvements, and other implementing actions to move the plan forward. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 8 PLAN OVERVIEWPRINCIPLES GOALS ASPIRATIONS RESILIENT AND CONNECTED SYSTEMS New pedestrian and bike facilities and wayfinding Green space connectivity and public realm enhancements Transit accessibility and transit supportive development Safe and accessible multimodal system management A sustainable and green district with restorative environmental practices that support Edina’s climate resiliency goals though both the public realm and private investment, setting a higher standard for how office/ industrial districts can function. REGIONAL ECONOMIC VALUE Quality jobs and growing tax base to support Edina Strengthened role as regional significant employment center Supportive of business growth and entrepreneurship Flexible and multi-functional spaces for evolving businesses An innovative business district that helps redefine the future of work through both enhanced, high amenity workspaces and forward-thinking businesses that explore new frontiers in their field, drawing on the top talent in the region and reflecting the city’s commitment to continuous learning and progress. COMMUNITY SERVING AND BUILDING More and enhanced community-serving businesses Improved buffering and management of transition areas Enhanced walkability, character, and appeal of the district New residential to expand Edina’s lifecycle housing options Additional community destinations and gathering places in the district A lively, vibrant mixed-use district that is an attractive destination for both local residents and areas visitors, with retail and services, unique living options, and leisure and entertainment opportunities that transform this into a niche urban community. DISTRICT PROFILEDISTRICT PROFILE Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 10 DISTRICT PROFILEEQUITY CONSIDERATIONS POPULATION The City of Edina is continually adapting its plans and policies to meet the needs and aspirations of a changing community. Diverse communities continue to grow and thrive in Edina, deepening the City’s resolve toward creating equitable opportunities for all resident. Taken from the decennial Censuses from 1980 to 2020, the data points below show the changes in the composition of each racial and ethnic group to the overall population of Edina. At the time of the 2020 Census, 20.40% of Edina’s 53,494 residents self-identified as Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC). In Edina, 13.0% of residents speak another other than English at home and 10.4% of residents were born outside the United States. It’s estimated that 9.0% of the population has a disability (ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2016-2020). As noted previously, the population residing within the boundaries of the Cahill District study area is quite small. However, portions of the District have substantial potential to redevelop as a thriving mixed-use hub. EQUITY The City of Edina has long been recognized an exceptional place to live. At the same time, the City also acknowledges that not all of its residents, students, and visitors experience Edina in the same way. To this end, the City government and resident leaders have been actively working to address these inequities for more than 50 years through policies and programs. These include the establishment of the City’s Human Rights and Relations Commission in 1970; passing a resolution to become a Human Rights City in 2016 with a commitment to “reducing discrimination, inequality, racism, and xenophobia in all aspects of civic life…”; and joining the Government Alliance on Race and Equity in 2017. Ongoing discrimination and inequities experienced by residents called the City to establish the Edina Race & Equity Task Force in 2016 which investigated “the scope of race-based discrimination and feelings of being unwelcome.” Edina continues to address inequities throughout its communities. The Cahill District Area plan will uplift these policies to ensure that residents of all identities can fully enjoy the resources and experiences the district has to offer, now and into the future. CITYWIDE & DISTRICT SUMMARY The City of Edina has long been regarded as a premier community in Minnesota for individuals and families to live, learn, and work. The Cahill District of Edina is one of the most dynamic locations in the entire city. This 380-acre, mixed-use area is home to a variety of industries, warehouses, recreational facilities, schools, religious institutions and multi-family dwellings. The Cahill District is bounded by West 70th Street to the north, Cahill Road to the west, Highway 100 to the east, and the municipal boundary to the City of Bloomington directly south. Despite its size, Cahill District is home to about 400 of Edina’s over 53,000 residents at this time. The vision for this strategic area will leverage mixed-use development patterns to provide more opportunities to develop housing. Therefore, the plan must consider the people who will live and work in the district DEMOGRAPHICS RACIAL DEMOGRAPHICS IN EDINA (1980 - 2020) POPULATION GROWTH (1980 - 2020) Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 11 DISTRICT PROFILESOCIOECONOMICS The frameworks and alternatives presented in the Cahill District Plan should also be informed by the socioeconomic situations of residents across the spectrum of household incomes and wealth in Edina. Household income data from the 2017-2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates for the City of Edina, the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, and the State of Minnesota are provided below. HEALTH Generally speaking, Edina residents experience more positive health outcomes than the national average. In addition to human behavior, individual health and public health are both deeply influenced by the built and natural environments. While public health experts and their partners provide their expertise and resources to the residents of Edina, the City can also strategically leverage the built and natural environments through thoughtful, interdisciplinary planning efforts to promote positive health outcomes. This is illustrated in the concept known has the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). SDOH are the conditions in the environments where people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks. SDOH have a major impact on people’s health, well-being, and quality of life. Examples of include: • Safe housing, transportation, and neighborhoods • Racism, discrimination, and violence • Education, job opportunities, and income • Access to nutritious foods and physical activity opportunities • Polluted air and water • Language and literacy skills SDOH also contribute to wide health disparities and inequities. For example, people who don’t have access to grocery stores with healthy foods are less likely to have good nutrition. That raises their risk of health conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and obesity — and even lowers life expectancy relative to people who do have access to healthy foods. Just promoting healthy choices won’t eliminate these and other health disparities. Instead, public health organizations and their partners in sectors like education, transportation, and housing need to take action to improve the conditions in people’s environments. SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH EDINA, MSP METRO, AND MINNESOTA INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS (2021) CITY OF EDINA TWIN CITIES METRO STATE OF MINNESOTA Total Households Estimate 22,667 1,453,400 2,281,033 Median income (2021 dollars) $115,047 $87,433 $77,720 Mean income (2021 dollars) $179,991 $114,348 $103,305 Source: 2021 American Community SurveySource: 2021 American Community Survey Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 12 DISTRICT PROFILELAND USE AND BUILT FORM POLICY & REGULATION City Staff, Planning Commission, and Council must work to ensure harmony between the individual Cahill District Plan, the zoning code and map, and the comprehensive plan during the implementation of any guidelines, policies, or actions prescribed in this plan. EXISTING LAND USE The majority of the Cahill district is zoned for, and used as, Planned Industrial Development (PID), which encompasses light industrial and manufacturing uses. Iterations of Planned Commercial Development (PCD) along the District’s eastern edge along Hwy 100, leveraging the relative ease of access to Hwy 100 via 70th St and 77th St., and I-494 via Planned Residential Development (PRD) anchors the District’s north east and west corners, and is the only residential in the District. FUTURE LAND USE The 2040 Future Land Use map largely guides the Cahill district to maintain its current uses, preserving its industrial & office foundation. City staff have noted that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and associated efforts intentionally did not heavily consider changes to the area, until a new study could better assess the future of the district – a key outcome of this district area plan. An update to the city comprehensive plan may be necessary to align study recommendations with official city maps and documents. ZONING The development of land in the City of Edina is principally guided by the Comprehensive Plan. While the comprehensive plan sets the policy framework informed by community vision and aspirations, the zoning code is the legal, administrative tool the City uses to regulate development. The predominant zoning in the Cahill District is Planned Industrial with Planned Residence and Commercial districts around the 70th and Cahill Rd Neighborhood Node, and Office and Commercial Districts along Hwy 100. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-9 Figure 3.3: Existing Land Use Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-9 Figure 3.3: Existing Land Use Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-26 Figure 3.12: Future Land Use Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-26 Figure 3.12: Future Land Use ¹»¹»¹»¹º¹º¹ºñ ññ¹»¹º¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes LakeMirror Lake HighlandsLake Melody Lake HarveyLake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RD CAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVE VERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVDMALONEY AVE 50TH ST W44TH S T W 54TH ST W58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Ladyof GraceCountryside School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter Golden YearsMontessoriAvailAcademy Valley View Middle School St PetersLutheran SchoolSouthviewMiddle School April 2023± LegendR-1 - Single Dwelling UnitR-2 - Double Dwelling U nitPRD-1 - Planned ResidencePRD-2 - Planned ResidencePRD-3 - Planned ResidencePRD-4 - Planned ResidencePRD-5 - Planned ResidencePCD-1 - Planned CommercialPCD-2 - Planned CommercialPCD-3 - Planned CommercialPCD-4 - Planned CommercialPOD-1 - Planned OfficePOD-2 - Planned OfficeRMD - Regional MedicalPID - Plann ed IndustrialPUD - Planned Unit DevelopmentAPD - Aut omotive ParkingPSR-4 - Planned ResidenceMDD-4 - Mixed Develo pmentMDD-5 - Mixed Develo pment MDD-6 - Mixed Develo pment Lakes Creeks Edina Boundar y Railroad ñ Pub lic B uilding ¹ºPub lic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET STW 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter'sLutheran SchoolW 54TH ST FULLER STFRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEG A R R IS O N L N FAIRFAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RDW 44TH STMORNINGSIDE RDFRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñEDEN AVEW 50TH STWILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning MapGRANDVIEW44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE54TH & FRANCEVALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHD ALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileCreek Minneh a haCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN• PID - Planned Industrial District • PUD - Planned Unit Development • PCD-1 - Planned Commercial District 1 • PCD-2 - Planned Commercial District 2 • PCD-4 - Planned Commercial District 4 • MDD-6 - Mixed Development District • R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit • PRD-2 - Planned Residence District 2 • PRD-3 - Planned Residence District 3 • PRD-4 - Planned Residence District 4 • POC-1 - Planned Office District 1 • POC-2 - Planned Office District 2 ¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST WFRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEGARRISO N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEG A R R IS O N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEG A R R IS O N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEG A R R IS O N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST WFRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEGARRISO N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST WFRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEGARRISO N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñ Lake Edina Lake Cornelia Indianhead Lake Arrowhead Lake Mud Lake Hawkes Lake M irror Lake Highlands Lake Melody Lake Harvey Lake Lake Pamela HWY 62 HWY 62 HWY 100HWY 100HWY 169HWY 16966TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST WFRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SVALLEYVIEWRD70TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RDCAHILL RDSCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDTRACY AVEHANSEN RDGLEASONRDVERNON AVEVERNON AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 50TH ST W 44TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST WWOODDALE AVEVALLEY VIEW RD I-494 City Hall Public Works Fire Station 2 Fire Station 1 Public Library Concord School Cornelia School Highland School Southdale Library Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Countryside School Creek Valley School Normandale Elementary Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessori Avail Academy Valley View Middle School St Peters Lutheran School Southview Middle School April 2023± Legend R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-1 - Planned Residence PRD-2 - Planned Residence PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PRD-5 - Planned Residence PCD-1 - Planned Commercial PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-3 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office POD-2 - Planned Office RMD - Regional Medical PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development APD - Automotive Parking PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development MDD-5 - Mixed Development MDD-6 - Mixed Development Lakes Creeks Edina Boundary Railroad ñ Public Building ¹ºPublic School ¹»Private School 0 970 Feet W 50TH ST MARKET ST W 49TH ST HALIFAX AVEARDEN AVEMAPLE RDFRANCE AVE SINDIANOLA AVEJUANITA AVEW 51ST ST ¹»St Peter's Lutheran School W 54TH ST FULLER ST FRANCE AVE SHALIFAX LNHALIFAX AVEW 61ST ST W 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW RD WOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEGARRISO N LN F AIR FAXAVE FRANCE AVE SYORK AVE SXERXES AVE SW 69TH ST W 66TH ST VALLEYVIEWRDFRANCE AVE SSANDELL AVELYMAR LNBRISTOL RDW 70TH ST HAZELTON RD MAVELLE DRSUNNYSIDE RD W 44TH ST MORNINGSIDE RD FRANCE AVECURVE AVEETON PLñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100GRANGERDñ ¹» EDEN AVEVERNON AVEHANKERSON AVEWILLIAM AVEBEDFORD AVEOXFORD AVEW 51ST ST INTERLACHEN BLVD ARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW LNHWY 100Our Lady of GraceCanadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadZoning Map GRANDVIEW 44TH & FRANCE 50TH & FRANCE 54TH & FRANCE VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE SOUTHDALE 70TH & FRANCE WILSON & EDEN CAHILL & 70TH NineMileCreek NineMileC re ekMinnehahaCreek Canadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall CAHILL RDAMUNDSON AVEW 70TH ST VILLAGE DR CREEK VIEW LN LIMERICK LN Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 13 DISTRICT PROFILEPROPERTY VALUES AND TAX CAPACITY The Cahill District is a principal property tax generator for the City. The table below presents a snapshot of key metrics to understand the tax capacity of the District under current conditions. BUILDING CONDITION The Cahill District saw widespread development between 1960 and 1979; about two-thirds of the existing buildings were constructed during that period. The remaining third of the district has been developed sporadically over the following four decades. Despite their age, three-quarters of all the properties in the Cahill District are classified as “Good” by the Hennepin County Assessor’s office in the last tax year. Four were considered to be in “Excellent” condition. BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUMS Structure heights throughout the Cahill District are subject to Overlay Districts in the zoning code (as well as regulation imposed by the primary zoning district). The industrial areas in the district have a standard height maximum of four (4) stories or 48 feet (whichever is less) under the HOD-4 overlay. The Neighborhood Node at 70th Street and Cahill Road has a height maximum of two (2) stories or 24 feet and the planned office districts on the eastern edge of Cahill have a maximum height of 8 stories or 96 feet. PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC PROPERTIES Approximately 40 acres of the Cahill District are owned by the City of Edina. The most significant of these is the Public Works building on the corner of 74th St and Metro Blvd. The District also hosts a US Post office on the corner of Dewey Hill Rd and Bush Lake Rd. Other semi-public uses include houses of worship, a bus garage, and a power station. The remainder of the public parcels shown here are undeveloped and may currently function as stormwater ponding areas or trail easements. æ ¹»¹»ææ æ æ æ¹»ææ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ññ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ æ ñ æ ¹º ñ æ ñ 40THSTWAVE AVEAVES(CORDNO17)NATCHEZAVESGRIMESFRANCEAVESKIPLINGLYNNMONTEREYNATCHEZAVES(UNDEVELOPED)(CORDNO17)AVEAVEAVEOAKDALEAVEFRANCEAVESDRCTOTTAWALITTLE ST (CORDNO17)CROCKERLYNNNATCHEZAVESGRIMESSCOTTTERFRANCEAVESMORNINGSIDE RDOAKDALEAVES WST S U N N YSID EAVEBRANSON AVES T CURVEAVE44THGRIMES2NDSTSGLENPL3RDSTSSPRUCERDSPRUCERD45THSTWSUNNYS ID E R DMERILANEDEARBORNCT44THSTWDRAVE M EADOWGROVEPLARTHURSTAVETERMAITLARDVERNONJOHNSTTHIELENAVE44THSTW(CORDNO20)COOLIDGEAVEBROOKAVEANNAWAYTOWNESDEARBORNCTSUNNYSIDEBROOKSIDEWRDBELMORELASTBELMORELA MEADOW44THBROOKSIDECT44THSTWWESTRDMONROEAVE(TOWNESCIR)ADAMSAVEHARRISONAVEMADISONAVEMOTORST TOWNES CIRJEFFERSONAVEAVESUNNYSIDEVANBURENAVEAVEMACKEYRD RDJACKSONAVEBLAKERDSAVEGRIFFITSTSU NNYSI DEBROOKSIDEAVE AVE47TH ST WOXFORDAVEMOOREAVEBLVDTYLERAVECIRCLEAVEAVEVANDERVORKAVEPARKSIDELANORTHAVERUTLEDGEAVECIRSTATEHWYNO100STATEHWYNO100JOHNSTARTHURSTTOWNESRDRD(BROOKSIDETER)MEADOWEASTLAURAAVEANNAWAYDRMALONEYAVEMALONEYAVEAVEOAKSEASTDIVISIONSTCIRCLERDCTBRIDGELABRIDGELACASCADELACIRCLEWHITEWMENDELSSOHNRDBRIDGELAJOHNSTTYLERSPUR48THSTWARTHURST(CORDNO20)ROLLINGLA RDCIR MERILANE LARUTLEDGEAVE R DPARKSIDELA MOORLANDEDINBROOKBROOKSIDEAVEOXFORDAVEGREENTERWATERMAN AVEWATERMANAVE ECOOPER CIRWATERMANAVE 48TH ST WCRESCENT BROWNDALELINCOLN 48TH ST WPKWY WOODDALEBYWOOD WEST PADDOCKBISSENCIRRDWAYEDINADRHOLLYWOOD RDBLAKERDS TOWNESRDDREXELARDENBRUCEMAPLERDWOODHILL CASCOCOOPERAVE49TH ST WSTATEHWYNO100RUTLEDGEMILLPONDPLRDVANDERVORKCLUBRDORCHARDLARIDGERDRIDGEPRESCOTTCIRAVECLUBCOUNTRYWESTBROOKLASUNNYSLOPEHOLLYWOODRDBLAKERDINTERLACHENCTGREENFARMSCIRPLINTERLACHENBLVD(CO RD NO 20)W7THST INTERLACHEN BLVDBLVDINTERLACHEN CO U N T R YSUNNYSLOPE(CO RD NO 20)INTERLACHEN BLVD 49TH ST W(CORDNO 20)INTERLACHEN PL (CORDNO17)DRBLUFFWOODDALEAVEBLVD HALIFAXAVECTLA CIRLACHENEDINADALEDRINTERTERTER50TH S T WINTERLACHENBLAKERDBENDSKYLINEDR(SUMMITAVE)AVEHILLTOP LA AVESUNNYSLOPEBRO W N DALEAV ESK Y LI NE DR DR5 0T H S T W JUANITAAVEOAKDALEKELSEYPARKRIDGERD AVECT AVEWOODSHAROLD 51ST ST W INDIANOLALA BRUCELAKELSEYWOODDALEBLOSSOMCTVERNONDRSCRIVERSCHAEFERRD JUANITAAVEWILLIAMAVEOXFORDAVEBEDFORDAVE 51STSTWLAKERIDGERDHANKERSONAVESLINCOLNDRSKYLINEEDENAVEMIRRORLAKESDRGREENFARMSRD51STSTW51STSTWRD(LINCOLNCIR)(CORDNO158)APPLELACHALICECT BRUCE AVEARCADIAAVE AVEMALIBUSTATEHWYNO100BROOKSIDEAVE(CORDNO17)ARDENWOODDALE GLEN52NDSTW HALIFAXAVEINDIANOLAGORGASAVEJUANITAAVERDWOODDALEAVEGREENWILLSONRDNORTHWOOD DR DRFOXRIDGEMEADOW (CORDNO158)NO RTH W OOD 52ND ST WLAEDENAVEFOXLINK52NDSTWMEADOWFARMSRDSTATEHWYNO100RDLACROYDENLAGRANDVIEWLAGLENGARRYPKWYGREENFARMSCTDRHIDDENWAYLAWILLSONRDLARADALAAVEDUNDEE (CORDNO17)BLVDMALIBUDRRDRDRD53R D ST WWAY)SCHAEFERRDVERNONEVANSWOODLALOCHLOYHIGHWOOD DR W AVELOCHLOYDRWESTWOODCT (VILLAEDENDONCASTERGREENFARMSRDBLAKERDLINCOLNDREVANSWOODLADUNCRAIG ST W53RDCIRCHANTREYDRMIRRORLAKESRDWRD HALIFAXTERDRLAWOODDALEAVESOUTH DR BLVDAYRSHIREWESTWOODCTTELEMARKTR MINNEHAHAPINEW OOD T RRDWILLOWWOODHIGHWOODPARKWOODKELSEYLARADA FRANCEAVESEDENMOORGROVERDPINE STSHERWOODRDGLENBRAE KELLOGGAVEOAKLAWNAVEBROOKVIEWAVEDRAYRSHIREBLVDAYRSHIREBLVDRDDRRICHWOODAKERSLA 54TH ST W54THSTW 54TH ST WDRVERNONAVEPARKWOODHIGHWOODWCIRDRLARADALACIRAYRSHIREMALIBUPARKWOODRDMALIBUDRPKWYDRGOLFTERMALIBUDRRICHMOND ABBOTTPLRICHMONDLARICHWOODRDBLVDCIR AVESLADRTERFULLER STRDRDRDIDYLWOODDRWAYGLENGARRYRDLAKEVIEWIDYLWOODLAWINDSORAVEGOLFPARKWOOD XERXESAVESMIRRORLAKESDRAVENORMANDALERDSTAUDERLAKEVIEW DRLAKEVIEWBLAKERDKNOLLMALIBUCHANTREYHIGHWOODDRWINDSORWINDSORAVEDUNDEEAVE DREWDR AVESCHAEFERRDBROOKVIEWAVEKELLOGGAVEDR IDYLWOODPLOAKLAWNAVEMALIBU WWILLSONDONCASTERDR 55TH ST W 55TH S T W 55TH ST WDEVERKNOLLDRSAXONYRDMERRITTCIRDRDRAVEVERNONAVEDRBEARDDRDRKENTAVELACODEDROAKEWINGCIRHALIFAXLONDONDERRYGOYALA(STATEHWYNO100)DR(C O R D N O 1 5 8 )STAUDERCIR PARKPLCONCORDHIGHWOODHIGHWOODPARKWOODPLEDEN PRAIR IE RD LEX INGTON (CORDNO31)AVELESLEELADUNDEERDGATEPARKRD56THSTWVERNONAVE W55THSTCIRFIELDWAYJEFFREYLASTJOHNSWKNOLLWOODCRESTSTAUDERST56THSTW56THWINDRDDR56TH ST WYVONNETER56THSHEATHERLACIR(C O R D N O 15 8)WOODLANDAVERIDGE PARK STW CIRHAWKES TERDRKAYMARDR RDSCHAEFERDRNEWPORTDRHIGHWOODDRDOVREDR GARDENAVELINCOLNDRDRHAWKESCAMELBACKDRDR TOWE R STWARDENAVE57THSTWRD57THSTWRDBLAKERDRD DLAPRAIRIEDRNA(V ER N O N LA )LDCONTINENTALODALEAVEOLAKEWRDCODEAVEEDENNORMANDALECTWYCLIFFEBERNARDPLNORMANDALERDRDDEVILLEBISCAYNEBLVDBISCAYNEBLVDTRACYAVEPARKWOODLALALAVIEWSOUTHVIEWLARDJOHNSONDRCIRMELODY(DUNCANBER NE HANSENRD57TH ST W SRDWOODLAND RD WWARDENAVEVERNONAVEMEROLDDRLA)BISCAYNEBLVD WOODLANDWAR DEN AVE WOODLANDLONDONDERRYSMELODYS(TUCKER WOODLAN D AVEOLINGERRD(STATEHWYNO100)WILLSONPARKWOODLALA)XERXESAVES(BLAKE AVEAVEAVERIDGE CONCORD TER YORKGROVE CIRLONDONDERRYRD GROVE ST GRO VE ST AVERD)EWINGAVESZENITHBEARDAVESCHOWENAVESDREWAVESABBOTTGROVE STCIRSCHAEFER WYCLIFFERDPHILBROOK LASHERMANCIRJOHNSCONCORD (CORDNO17)LONDONDERRYDR FAIRFAX(CORDNO31)GROVE STSCHAEFER OAKLAGROVE ST GARDENAVE58TH ST W 58TH S T WSHERMANCIR 58TH ST W58THSTW 58TH ST WOAKLALONDONDERRYDRJOHNSONDRRDEASTVI EWDRVIE WAMY DR LYLE CIR AVEAVE(HCSAHNO159)L A DALEAVESTUARTAVELAHANSENRDAVEBENTONGRIMES DRBENTON AVE BEN TON AV EBENTONAVE B ENTON NORMANDALERDTAMARACLATRACYAVEARBOURAVECODEAVELINCOLNDRAVEAVEBERNARDPLAVEAVE AVEAVEAVETINGDALEAVECONCORDRDVERNONAVE OLINGERRDCRESCENTDR59TH ST W59THSTW WALNUT59TH ST WASPENRD59THSTWEWINGAVESDREWAVESCHOWENAVESHALIFAX59THSTWSUNRDBEARDAVESOLINGER(STATEHWYNO100)VIEWLAXERXESAVESOLINGER STJOHNSCOU NTRYSIDE RD ASHCROFTJOSEPHINEAVEBLVD FAIRFAX(LANGFORDDR)CIR RUTHDRAVEGLEASONRDKILLARNEYLAABBOTTAVESZENITHAVESRD YORKAVESSCHOOL60THSTW (CORDNO31)(LANGFORDCT)60THSTW CIR(LANGFORDDR) OLINGER HIGH LAND RD ARBOURWILLSONRDLI NCOLNDRSCHAEFERRDARBOURS TATEHWYNO169 60TH ST W60THSTWTAMARACAVE60THSTW60THSTWHANSENRD60THSTWLAVIEWLACLOVERRIDGEDRGRIMESP OR TER AVEKILLARNEYLA FORSLIN LA AVEP O LA R (STATEHWYNO100)GL ACI ERP L VERNON DRAVE60TH ST W61STSTSTWGLEASONRD61STSTWHUNTERWALNUTCIR DREWAVESHALIFAXEWINGAVESCHOWENAVESAVEFAIRFAXAVETINGDALEAVEARBOURAVEOLINGERBLVDDR61ST VALLEYSTWW E ST RID GE A V EOLINGERRD VALLEYVIEW RDBEARDAVESBIRCHCRESTDR6 1S T S T W ARBOURLARIDGEWAYXERXESAVESCODEAVETRACYNORMANDALERDJEFF P LARCTICWAY AVE61ST ST WHANSENRDB LVDVERNONAVE AVE CRESCENTAVEWATERFORDCT(WELLESLEYPL)BIRCH CREST DR VIEWVIRGINIACTWILRYAN RD KELLOGGCONCORDRDYORKAVESOAKLAWNRYANAVEVIRGINIAPARNELL RD C URCHOWENARCTICWAY BROOKVIEWHABITATPLLA (CORDNO31)(HCSAHNO158)ST.JOHNSVERNONCT OLIN GERBLVD OLINGERBLVD 62NDSTWROUSHARRD 62ND ST W VER BEARDN O 62N DRDN ZENITHAVESABBOTTAVESCT DRASHCROFTWESTRIDGECRE STLA ST W MILDRED(ORIOLELA)CT CRE SCENTGLEASON WYMANAVE6 2ND ST WRD62NDSTW 62ND ST WVERNONHILLSRDMADDOXLAR OL FCOL ONI ALMADDO X LA HIL L SI DE R DA VE WILRYANAVEVALLEYVIEWVALLEYVIEWAV EPLHANSENROBERTS(SANDPIPERCT) RD(V IL LA L A )STATEHWYNO62 RYANAVETRACYAVELA GARRISON (RE DF OXL A) STATE HWY NO62B L V D LADARCYMCCAULEYTRLALA BEARDPLGARRISONPARNELLAVEVIRGINAAVEWAYNORMANDALERD CHOWENAVESDR(CORDNO158)CONCORDAVED R 63RD ST WCRESCENTSTATEHWYNO62CT)(PHEASANT AVEPOST WCOLONIALCT(F A LCO N CT ) S T STATEHWYNO62 (REDFOXCT)PARKLAWST63RDGLEASONRD NANCY LA63RDM CC A ULE Y STATEHW YNO62HILLSI DEHERITAGE MCI NT Y RET R EWINGR DLATR BROOKVIEWAVEWV IE W XERXESAVESR DMCCAULEYCIR STATEHWYNO 62 (CORDNO31)HALIFAXAVEAVEMCCAULEYTR VALLEYTIMBERROLFAVEASHCROFTPTTINGDALEAVEWOODDALEAVEEPEACEDALEAVERIDGEVIEWDRGMILDREDAVEDWARRENAVEIRLASS T A T E H W Y N O 6 2 (STATEHWYNO100)REBWHITIN GAVE WHITING AVE WILRYANAVEMCCAULEY TERMIT VALLEYVIEWRDSTJOHNSMILLERSJOSEPHINEAVEROSECTHOLBORNAVE64THST W64THSTW 6 4TH S T W64THSTW64TH 64THST WLARIDGE STATE HWYNO 62 DRTIMBER DORONLA (COLONYWAY)AVEGLEAS ON MILDREDAVEDO R O N HILLSPASS DR L I ME R IC K D R LIMERICKRIDGEVIEWDORONLAINDIAN YORKAVESWATERLAL I MERI CKDRXERXESAVESNORMANDALERDAVEVALL E Y LA INDIANPONDCIRMARGARETSLAL A VALL EYVI EWRD65TH ST WDCIRRSCH ER OK EE TRACYLLIV A LL E Y HR ID G E V IE W 65TH ST W 65THS TW 65TH STWN 65TH ST WAICREEKVALLEYRDRDINDIANDROLFAVENIWILRYANAVEWARRENAVERYANAVETINGDALEAVEJOSEPHINEAVEVALLEYVIEWRDFRANCEAVESTRRI DGEVI EWDR31)BARRIERDCREEKWESTSHOREDRPARNELLAVEHILLSNONORDICDRTRSCANDIARDCT SHERWOOD(CORDHIL LSI DE(STATEHWYNO100)BALDERLA (CORDNO17)BRENDANCT INDIANDAKOTA HILLS DRINDIANHILLSCIRARROWHEADPASSNAVAHOCHEROKEETRTR RDHILLSRD HILLSIDEINDIAN 66TH ST WRD SCANDIARD (C O RD NO 53)66TH ST W66THSTWW66THSTWST66TH CORNEL IA CIR AVEDR66TH ST WINDIANWAYWRD DRIRDN CD ISCANDIARDI V AL LE Y R D DA WARRENN RH OIL NL W E S T S SOUTHDALERDLALAGRACETERRD RDPASSPAWNEEDRTRLACIRRDC H E YE NN E T RAPACHERD CAHILL XERXESAVESDRTRACYAVELADAKOTABLACKFOOTCREEKVALLEYRD RDSH O RELIMERICKIROQUOISTRNO BCREEKVIEWRDMOHAWKTRNORMANDALERDLOIS LA DAN EN SLIMERICK HILL DR SALLYWESTTR (CORDNO31)T DRSALVALLEYBA L A G U N A NS CIRGLEASONRDLA AVECAHILLDR MEADOWRIDGE68THST WWESTYSUSANAVETRRGALWAYAMEHILLSIDES (CORDNO17)ODRRROYCARPAYTONCT TRACYRDSAMUELRD DUGGAN YORKAVESBALFAN Z (STATEHWYNO100)RD P LA ZA 68TH68THSTW ST W(CORDNO39)VALLEY VIEW RDVALLEYVIEWRD DANENSOAKLAW NRUPPERIRDDRCSIOUXTRG ALWAYDRH A R V EY LA PLD U G GA N TRIROQUOIS DRHI LLSIDECHAPELLADREN RIDGEVIEWDRYORKAVESDRNBRITTANYEC H A P ELYEH LACVALLEYVIEWRD TER FRANCEAVESPLAZAPAIUTE NORMANDALERDM CC AU LE YCHE YENN E JU D S ON LA BROOKDRBROOKDR LADR XERXESAVESLAWILFORD T R SCIR DR PLAZADUGGANADRL 69THSTTIFTONANTRIMRD W POINTSHORETRACYAVEBROOK CRESTONCHAPELDAKOTATR69THSTWY 69THLTERLALDAWSONLARDA VECORNELIAST 69TH S T WDRWAYAWSSHANESTPATRICKSLA HILLCRESTABERCROMBIEDRGLEASONCIR DRDRLADUNBERRYSTA TELIMERICKERIN SOUTHDALEEVERETTPAIUTECIR NORMANDALERDDRMCGUIRERDMCGUIRERD HWYTERRACEW 69 ü STVIEW RABU N ABERCROMBIECREEKOVERHOLTPASSRD VIEWLA VALLEYVIEWRDDUN BERRY(STATEHWYNO100)NOTI F T O N (CORDNO31)LAMARKCHURCHPLVALLEY 169SHAWNEECIR WESTD RDUBLINAB ERCRO MBIE DRPAIUTEDR WOODDALECIR GLEASONMOCCASINVALLEYRDDRTUPASCOTIADR 70THS TW 70TH S T W70THSTW70THSTW70THSTWMARKTERRACEDRSCOTIAM O C CA SIN CI R LEEWESTONRDVALLEYSDR DRV ALLEY 70THCIR DRWTR DUBLINV IL LA GE DR CIR ST W SANDELLAVECIR ANTRIMRDLANHAMLAANDOVER RD TRKERRY LARKSPUR MCCAULEYMAVELLEDRSALLYLAMARKTERRACEDR70TH LAXERXESAVESBLVDDRAVEAVE(CORDNO31)CIR (CORDNO17)AVERDHILLAWAYCT(FORMERLYHCSAHNO18,PLAT18)CAHILLRDBRAEBURN MAVELLE COMANCHECTRDGLE ASO NRD D OWN RD ANT RIM L ATUPA BELVIDERE LAVIEW AVER DRDASPASIA T E RM A R K VALLEY RDWEXFORDRDDRCORNELIADRVIEW A N T R IM T E RRA CEAMUNDSON WESTSHOREMETROBLVDHAZELTON RD HAZELTON(OAKGLENRD)CTLOCHMOOR DRDR L A DOWNRDBRISTOLHEATHERTONGLOUCHESTERCLAREMORE CTDR KELLOGGSTATEHWYNO169CLAREMORE DRAVELANHAMLAMARKTERRACEDRNORMANDALERD(STATEHWYNO100)VALLEYVALLEYVIEWRD LYNMARASPASIA WOODDALETRILLIUMFLEETWOOD CIR FRANCEAVESAMUNDSONSHANNONCLAREMOREL EEDUNHAM DRDR DRMETROBLVD 72N D ST WLALANTANALADUNHAMDRRDVA L LE Y B RIST OL VDA CIRHEATHERTONRL 72ND STW LEWYEIVHILARYLN TRALEEHILARY CIRSHANNONRDGLEASONLNLADRLN DRELLSWORTH(FORMERLYHCSAHNO18,PLAT18)(LEWISSCHEY FRANCEAVESAVEHILARYAVERIDGE TRILLIUMDUNHAMPKWY)(STATEHWYNO100)HIBISCUS DRAVE ELLSWORTHDR MONARDOLAYORKAVESSHANNONFRONTAGERDWESTSHOREDRFONDELL D R CORNELIADRNORMANDALERD(COVENTRY VIEW)GLOUCHESTERDR73RDST WCAHILLRDSTATEHWYNO169 DRAVEGLEASONRD FOND ELLDR KEMRICH TARARDDR PL)WOODDALE(C OVEN TRYDRBUSHLAKERD LA)(CORDNO31)OAKLAWNGL E A SONR DXERXESAVESPHLOX LA GALLAGHERCLAREDONDR(COVENTRYCORNELIADRGILFORDDRGILFORDDR DEWEYHILLRDDRAVE(COVENTRY CT)DEWEY HILL RD DEWEY HILLRDRDHARRISDEWEYHILL 74TH S T WLAJOHN SHANNONWESTOAKLAWNAVELA)AVEHIBISCUSRDAVEHIBISCUSAVE GALLAGHERDRFRONTAGERD(COVENTRYAVE PA R K L AW N PA RK CIR AVEPARKLAWN DRIKOLA 74THST W COVENTRYWAY74THS TW YORKTERLN P A R K LA W N BLVD YORKAVESW AY (FORMERLYHCSAHNO18,PLAT18)NORMANDALERDHILARY KELLOGGAVESH A N N O N C IRDELANEYBLVDXERXESAVESLASHOREDR METRO75TH ST WSEDUMHYDEPARKLA (CORDNO17)CAHILLRD(STATEHWYNO100)FRANCEAVESWESTHYDEPARKDREDINBOROUGHWAYPOPPYLA P A RK L AW N C T STATEHWYNO169POPPY(CORDNO31)GLEASONL ATRBONNIEBRAEDR D RBR AK E 76THST WLONG76THSTW S H O R E W EST ST76TH W76THSTWD E LA NE Y BL V D CTLONGBRAKECIRTR(PONDWOODNORMANDALERDMETROBLVDB RAK EPARKLAWNAVELONG (COBUSHLAKERDB LVD DR)BLVD)CAHILLRDRDSTONEW O O DN OGLEASONRD (STATEHWYNO100)31 )(WOODVIEWCT)(DELANEYG L AS G O W INDUSTRIALTERY O R K AV E S D R WST EDINA (CORDNO17)ED INAINDUSTRIAL BLVD 77TH ST W 77TH ST W78TH FRANCEAVESEDINBOROUGHWAYRD LA KE CT(DISKDR)LOCHMEREXERXESAVES(O L D ST H W Y N O 5 )BUSHMARTHCTTANGLEWOOD SHAUGHNESSYRDCOMPUTERAVECECILIACIRWST78TH 78TH STW VIKINGD R MINNESOTADR MIN NESOTA DR 7 8T H S T W (CORDNO169)78THSTW 78THSTW (STATEHWYNO5)INTERSTATEHWYNO494 NORDICCIR IN G LE W OODRDLAKEVIEW INTERSTATEHWY94 TIMBERRIDGE CTDREWAVES(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVESFRANCEAVES(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVESWOODDREND (CORDNO17)FRANCEAVES49THST W FRANCEAVESFRANCEAVES(CORDNO17)(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVESALDEN42ND STWEVAAVE42NDSTWBRUCEPLWOODDALEKELLOGGPLAVE41STSTW AVEWOODDALERDESTSHOREDRKELLOGGEDGEBROOKRDWSUNNYSLOPER IC H M O N DWARWICK CODEAVEKENNEYPLNAOMIDRCIRCLEDROHMSTIFTONDRHANSENRDCIR AMUNDSONAVETUPA H YDE TERGLEASONKRESSEKINGSBERRY SAOENLGCT PASSPAIUTE OLLEB BRORRD Mud Lak e La ke Ed in a Mirror Lake La ke Cornelia Arrowhead Lake Hig hla ndsLake Indianhead Lake Melody Lake La ke Pamela HawkesLake Harvey La ke Centennial Lake Minnehaha Creek Nine Mile Creek Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadCityHall St Peters Lutheran Church & School Fire Station PublicWorks GraceChurchPublicLibrary Concord School EdinaCovenant Cornelia School Colonial Church HighlandSchool Calvary Lutheran Edina High School Our Lady ofGrace Church& S chool SouthviewMiddle School Crossview Lutheran Countryside School St Albans Episcopal Valley View Middle School Creek Valley School Normandale Lutheran ColonyParkBaptist St Patricks Catholic Creek Valley Baptist Norm andaleElementary St StephensEpiscopalEdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessorCalvinChristianSchoolGoodSamaritanMethodistEdinaMorningsideChurch Christ Pres byterian Chapel Hills Congregtional Shepard of the HillsLutheran Edina Comm unity Lutheran Church Fire Station CalvinChristianSchoolSEEDETAILLEFTCENTERSEEDETAILUPPER LEF T CAHILL RD & 70TH DETAIL VILLAGE DR CAHILL RDW 70TH ST AMUNDSON AVESEE DE TAIL LOWE R LEFT Building Height Overlay DistrictsCity of EdinaHennepin County, MinnesotaAppendix A /Plannin g DeptDecember, 2013LegendæChurchñCity B uilding s¹»Priva te Scho ol¹ºPub lic Sch oolHOD-2 Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exceed 2 stories or 24 fee t, whichever is less.HO D-3 Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exceed 3 stories or 36 fee t, whichever is less.HO D-8 Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exceed 8 stories or 96 fee t, whichever is less.HO D-9 Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exceed 9 stories or 108 fe et, whichever is less.HOD-10 Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exceed 10 stories or 120 f eet, whichever is less.Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exce ed 12 stories or 144 f eet, whichever is less.HO D-12HOD-4 Building height shall be determine d by required setbacks,but sh all not exceed 4 stories or 48 fee t, whichever is less. VALLEY VIEW RDWOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEW 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DETAIL W 49TH STW 50TH STW 49 1/2 ST FRANCE AVEW 51ST STHALIFAX AVE50TH & FRANCE DE TAILW 54TH ST FRANCE AVEFULLE R ST54TH & FRANCE DE TAILWILSON RD & EDEN AVE DETAILñEDEN AVEW 50TH STWILSON RDHWY 100CITYHALLGRANDVIEW DETAILEDEN AVEVERNON AVEBROOKSIDE AVEARCADIA AVEW 52ND ST W 53RD STGRANDVIEW LAINTERLACHEN BLVDHWY 100GRANDVIEW SQLIN K R D 44TH & FRANCE DETAILMORNINGSIDE RDW 4 4 T H S TSUNNYSIDE RDFRANCE AVEæ ¹» ¹» æ ææ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ æ ñ æ ¹º ñ æ ñ 40THSTW AVEAVEAVES(CORDNO17)NATCHEZAVESGRIMESFRANCEAVESKIPLINGLYNNMONTEREYNATCHEZAVES(UNDEVELOPED)(CORDNO17)AVEAVEAVEOAKDALEAVEFRANCEAVESDRCTOTTAWALITTLEST (CORDNO17)CROCKERLYNNNATCHEZAVESGRIMESSCOTTTERFRANCEAVESMORNINGSIDERD OAKDA LEAVESWSTSUNNYSIDEAVE BRANSON AVEST CURVE AV E 44TH GRIMES2NDSTS GLENPL 3RDSTSSPRUCERDSPRUCERD45THSTWSUNNYSIDERD MERILANEDEARBORNCT44THSTWDRAVEMEADOWGROVEPLARTHURSTAVE TERMAITLARDVERNONJOHNSTTHIELENAVE44THSTW(CORDNO20)COOLIDGEAVEBROOKAVEANNAWAYTOWNESDEARBORNCTSUNNYSIDE BROOKSIDEWRDBELMORELASTBELMORELAM E ADOW44THBROOKSIDECT 44THSTW WESTRDMONROEAVE(TOWNESCIR)ADAMSAVEHARRISONAVEMADISONAVEMOTORSTTOWNESCIRJEFFERSONAVEAVESUNNYSIDEVANBURENAVEAVEMACKEYRDR DJACKSONAVEBLAKERDSAVEGRIFFITSTSUNNYSIDEBROOKSIDEAVE AVE47THSTWOXFORDAVEMOOREAVEBLVDTYLERAVECIRCLEAVEAVEVANDERVORKAVEPARKSIDELANORTHAVERUTLEDGEAVECIRSTATEHWYNO100STATEHWYNO100JOHNSTARTHURSTTO WNESR D RD (BROOKSIDETER)MEADOWEASTLAURAAVEANNAWAYDR MALONEYAVEMALONEYAVEAVEOAKSEASTDIVISIONSTCIRCLE RDCTBRIDGELABRIDGELACASCADELACIRCLEWHITEWM ENDELSSOHNRDBRIDGELA JOHNSTTYLERSPUR48THSTWARTHURST (CORDNO20)ROLLIN GLA RDCIRME RI LANELARUTLEDGEAVERDPARKSIDELA MOORLANDEDINBROOKBROOKSIDEAVEOXFORDAVEGREENTERWATERMANAVEWATERMANAVEECOOPERCIRWATERMANAVE48THSTWCRESCENT BROWNDALELINCOLN48THSTWPK WYWOODDALEBY WO O D WES T PADDOCKBISSENCIRRDWAYEDINAD RHOLLYWOODRD BLAKERDSTOWNESRDDREXELARDENBRUCEMAPLERDWOODHILLCASCOCOOPERAVE49THSTWSTATEHWYNO100R UTLEDGEMILLPONDPLRD VANDERVORKCLUBRDORCHARDLAR IDGERDRIDGEPRESCOTTCIRAVECLUBCOUNTRYWESTBROOKLASUNNYSLOPEHOLLYWOODRDBLAKERDINTERLACHENCTGREENFARMSCIRPLINTERLACHENBLVD(CORDNO20)W7THSTINTERLACHENBLVDBLVDINTERLACHENCOUNTRY SUNNYSLOPE(CORDNO20)INTERLACHENBLVD49THSTW(CORDNO20)INTERLACHEN PL (CORDNO17)DRBLUFFWOODDALEAVEBLVDHALIFAXAVEC TLACIRLACHENEDINADALEDR INTERTERTER50THSTWINTERLACHEN BLA KE RDBENDSKYLINEDR(SUMMITAVE)AVEHILLTOPLAAVESU NNY SLOPEBROWNDALEAVESKYLINEDRDR50THSTWJUANITAAVE OAKDALEKELSEYPARKRIDGERDAVECTAVEWOODSHAROLD51STSTWINDIANOLALABRUCELAKELSEYWOODDALEBLOSSOMCTVERNONDRS C RIV ERSCHAEFERRDJUANITAAVEWILLIAMAVEOXFORDAVEBEDFORDAVE51STST W LAKE RIDGE RDHANKERSONAVESLINCOLNDRSKYLINEEDEN AVE MIRRORLAKESDRGREENFARMSRD51STSTW51STSTW RD(LINCOLNCIR)(CORDNO158)APPLELACHALICECTBRUCEAVE ARCADIAAVEAVEMALIBUSTATEHWYNO100BROOKSIDEAVE(CORDNO17)ARDENWOODDALEGLEN52NDSTW HALIFAXAVEINDIANOLAGORGASAVEJUANITAAVERD WOODDALEAVEGREENWILLSONRDNORTHWOODDRDRFOXRIDGEMEADOW(CORDNO158)NORTHWOOD 52NDSTWLAEDENAVE FOXLINK52NDSTWMEADOWF ARMSRDSTATEHWYNO100RDLA CROYDENLAGRANDVIEWLA GLENGARRYPKWYGREENFARMSCTDRHIDDENWAYLAWILLSONRDLARADALAAVEDU NDEE(CORDNO17)BLVDMALIBUDRRDRDRD53RDSTWWAY)SCHAEFERRDVERNONEVANSWOODLALOCHLOYHIGHWOODDRWAVELOCHLOYDRWESTWOODCT(VILLAEDEN DONCASTERGREENFARMSRDBLAKER DLINCOLNDREVANSWOODLA DUNCRAIGSTW53RDCIRCHANTREYDRMIRRORLAKESRDW RDHALIFAXTERDRLAWOODDALEAVESOUTHDRBLVDAYRSHIREWESTWOODCTTELEMARKTRMINNEHAHAPINEWOODTRRDWILLOWWOODHIGHWOODPARKWOODKELSEY LARADAFRANCEAVESEDENMOORGROVERDPINE STSHERWOODRDGLENBRAEKELLOGGAVEOAKLAWNAVEBROOKVIEWAVEDRAYRSHIREBLVDAYRSHIREBLVDRDDRRICHWOODAKERSLA54THSTW54THSTW54THSTWDRVERNONAVEPARKWOODHIGHWOODW CIRDRLARADALACIRA YRSHI REMALIBUPARKWOODRDMALIBUDRPKWYDRGOLFTER MALIBUDRRICHMONDABBOTTPLRICH MOND L A RICHWOODRDBL VDCIRAVESLADRTERFULLERSTRDRDRDIDYLWOODDRWAYGLENGARRYRDLAKEVIEW IDYLWOODLA WINDSORAVEGOLFPARKWOOD XERXESAVESMIRRORLAKESDRAVENORMANDALERDSTAUDERLAKEVIEWDRLA K EVIE WBLAKERDKNOLLMALIBUCHANTREYHIGHWOODDRWINDSORWINDSORAVEDUNDEEAVEDREWDRAVESCHAEFERRDBROOKVIEWAVEKELLOGGAVEDRIDYLWOODPLOAKLAWNAVEM ALIBUWWILLSONDONCASTERDR55THSTW55THSTW55THST WDEVERKNOLLDRSAXONYRDMERRITTCIRD RDRAVEVERNONAVEDRBEARDDR DRKENTAVELACODEDROAKEWINGCIRHALIFAXLONDONDERRYGOYALA(STATEHWYNO100)DR(CORDNO158)STAUDERCIR PARKPLCONCORDHIGHWOODHIGHWOODPARKWOODPLEDENPRAIRIERDLEXINGTON (CORDNO31)AVE LESLEELADUNDEERDG A T EPARK R D 56THSTWVERNONAVEW55THST CIRFIELDWAYJEFFREYLASTJOHNSW KN OLLWOODCRESTSTAUDERST56THSTW56THWINDRDDR56THSTWYVONNETER56THSHEATHERLACIR(CORDNO158)WOODLANDAVERIDGEPARKSTWCIRHAWKESTERDRKAYMARDR RDSCHAEFER DRNEWPORTDRHIGHWOODDRDOVREDRGARDENAVELINCOLNDRDRH A WK E SCAMELBACKDRDRTOWERSTWARDENAVE57THSTWR D57THSTWRDBLAKERDRDDLAPRAIRIEDRNA(VERNONLA) LDCONTINENTALODALEAVEOLAKEWRDCODEAVEEDENNO RMA N DALECT W YCLIFFEBERNARDPLNORMANDALERDRDDEVILLEBISCAYNEBLVDBISCAYNEBLVDTRACYAVEPARKWOODLALALAVIEWSOUTHVIEWLARDJOHNSONDRCIRMELODY(DUNCANBERNEHANSENRD57THSTWSR DWOODLANDRDWWARDENAVEVERNON AVE MEROLDDR L A)BISCAYNEBLVDWOODLANDWARDENAVEWOODLAND LONDONDERRYSMELODYS(TUCKER WOODLANDAVEOLINGERRD (STATEHWYNO100)WILLSONPARKWOODLALA)XERXESAVES(B L AKEAVEAVEAVERIDGECONCORDTERYORKGROVECIRLONDONDERRYRDGROVESTGROVESTAVERD)EWINGAVESZENITHBEARDAVESCHOWENAVESDREWAVESABBOTTGROVESTCIRSCHAEFERWYCLIFFERDPHILBROOKLASH ERMA N CI RJOHNSCONCORD(CORDNO17)LONDONDERRYDRFAIRFAX (CORDNO31)GROVESTS C H AEF E ROAKLAGROVESTGARDENAVE58THSTW58THSTWSHERMANCIR 58THSTW58THSTW58THSTWOAKLALONDONDERRYDRJOHNSONDRR DE AS T VI EWDRVI EWAMYDRLYLECIR AVEAVE(HCSAHNO159)L ADALEAVE STUARTAVELAHANSENRDAVEBENTONGRIMESDRBENTONAVEBENTONAVEBENTONAVEBENTONNORMANDALERDTAMARACLATRACYAVEARBOURAVECODEAVELINCOLNDR AVEAVEBERNARDPLAVEAVEAVEAVEAVETINGDALEAVECONCORDRDVERNONAVEOLINGERRDCRESCENTDR59THSTW59THSTWWALNUT59THSTWASPENRD59THSTWEWINGAVESDREWAVESCHOWENAVESHALIFAX59THSTWSUNRDBEARDAVESOLINGER(STATEHWYNO100)VIEWLAXERXESAVESOLINGERSTJOHNSCOUNTRYSIDERDASHCROFTJOSEPHINEAVEBLVDFAIRFAX(LANGFORDDR)C IRRUTHDRAVEGLEASONRDKILLARNEYLAABBOTTAVESZENITHAVESRDYORKAVESSCHOOL60THSTW (CORDNO31)(LANGFORDCT)60THSTW CIR(LANGFORDDR) OLINGERHIGHLANDRDARBOURWILLSONRDLI NCOL ND RSCHAEFERRDARBOURST ATEHWYNO1 6 9 60THSTW60THSTWTAMARACAVE60THSTW60THSTWHANSENRD60THSTWLAVIEWLACLOVERRIDGEDRGRIMESPORTER AVEKILLARNEYLAFORSLINLAAVEP O LA R(STATEHWYNO100)GLA CIE R PL VERNOND RAVE60THSTW61STSTSTWGLEASONRD61STSTWHUNTERWALNUTCIRDREWAVESH ALIFAXEWINGAVESCHOWENAVESAVEFAIRFAXAVETINGDALEAVEARBOURAVEOLINGERBLVDDR61STVALLEYSTWWEST RID GE AVEOLINGERRDVALLEYVIEWRDBEARDAVESBIRCHCRESTDR61STSTWARBOURLARI DGEWAYXERXESAVESCODEAVETRACYNORMANDALERDJEFFPLARCTICWAYAVE61STSTWHANSENRDB LVDVERNONAVE AVECRESCENTAVEWATERFORDCT(WELLESLEYPL)BIRCHCRESTDRVIEWVIRGINIACTWILRYANRDKELLOGGCONCORDRDYORKAVESOAKLAWNRYANAVEVIRGINIAPARNELLRDCURCHOWENARCTICWAYBROOKVIEWHABITATPLLA (CORDNO31)(HCSAHNO158)ST.JOHNSVERNONCT OLINGERBLVDOLINGERBLVD62NDSTWROUSHARRD62NDSTW VERBEARDNO 62N DRDNZENITHAVESABBOTTAVESCTDRASHCROFTWE STRIDGECRESTLASTWM ILDRED(ORIOLELA)CTCRESCENTGLEASONWYMANAVE62NDSTWRD62NDSTW62NDSTWVERNONHILLSRDMADDOXLAR OLFCOL ONI ALMADDOXLAHILLSI DERD AVEWILRYANAVEVALLEYVIEW VALLEYVIEW AVEPLHANSENROBERTS(SANDPIPERCT) RD(VILLALA)STATEHWYNO62RYANAVETRACYAVELAGARRISON (RED FO X LA) STATEHWYNO62B LV D LADARCYMCCAULEYTRLALABEARDPLGARRISONPARNELLAVEVIRGINAAVEWAYNORMANDALERDCHOWENAVESDR(CORDNO158)CONCORDAVEDR63RDSTWCRESCENTSTATEHWYNO62CT)(PHEASANTAVEPO S T WCOLONIALCT(FALCONCT) STSTATEHWYNO62 (REDFOXCT)PARKLAWST63RDGLEASONRDNANCYLA63RDM CC A ULEY STATEHWYNO62 HI LLSI DEHERITAGE MCIN TY R E TRE WI NGRDLATR BROOKVIEWAVEWVIEW XERXESAVESR DMCCAULEYCIR STATEHWYNO62 (CORDNO31)HALIFAXAVEAVEMCCAULEYTRVALLEYTIMBERROLFAVEASHCROFTPTTINGDALEAVEWOODDALEAVEEPEACEDALEAVERIDGEVIEWDRGMILDREDAVEDWARRENAVEIRLASSTATEHWYNO62(STATEHWYNO100)REBWHITINGAVEWHITINGAVEWILRYANAVEMCCAULEYTERMITVALLEYVIEWRDSTJOHNS MILLERSJOSEPHINEAVEROSECTHOLBORNAVE64THSTW64THSTW64THST W64THSTW64TH 64THSTWLARIDGESTATEHWYNO62 DRTIMBERDORONLA (COLONYWAY)AVEGLEASONMILDREDAVED O R O NHILLSPASS DRLIMERICKDR LIMERICKRIDGEVIEWDORONLAINDIANYORKAVES WATERLALI ME RIC KDRXERXESAVESNORMANDALERDAVEVALLEYLAINDIANPONDCIRMARGARETSLALAVA LL EYVI EWRD65THSTWDCIRRSCHEROKEETRACYLLIVALLEYHRIDGEVIEW 65THSTW65THSTW65THSTWN65THSTWAICREEKVALLEYRDRDINDIANDROLFAVENIWILRYANAVEWARRENAVERYANAVETINGDALEAVEJOSEPHINEAVEVALLEYVIEWRDFRANCEAVESTRRID GEVIE WD R 31)BARRIERDCREEKWESTSHOREDRPARNELLAVEHILLS NONORDICDRTRSCANDIARDCT SHERWOOD(CORD HIL LSI DE(STATEHWYNO100)BALDERLA (CORDNO17)BRENDANCTINDIANDAKOTA HILLSDRINDIANHILLSCIRARROWHEADPASSNAVAHOCHEROKEETRTR RDHILLSRDHILLSIDEINDIAN66THSTWRDSCANDIARD(CORDNO53)66THSTW66THSTWW66THSTWST66TH CORNELIACIR AVEDR66THSTWINDIANWAYWRDDRIRDNCDISCANDIARDIVALLEYRDDAWARRENNRHOILNLWEST SSOUTHDALERDLALAGRACETERRD RDPASSPAWNEEDRTRLACIRRDC H E YE N N E T R APACHERDCAHILL XERXESAVESDRTRACYAVELADAKOTABLACKFOOTCREEKVALLEYRDRDSH O RELIMERICKIROQUOISTRNO BCREEKVIEWRDMOHAWKTRNORMANDALERDLOISLADANENSLIMERICKHILLDRSALLYWESTTR(CORDNO31)TDRSALVALLEYBALAGUNANS CIRGLEASONRDLAAVECAHILLDR MEADOWRIDGE68THSTWWESTYSUSANAVETRRGALWAYAMEHILLSIDES(CORDNO17)ODRRROYCARPAYTONCTTRACYRDSAMUELRDDUGGANYORKAVESBALFANZ(STATEHWYNO100)RD PLAZA 68TH68THSTWSTW(CORDNO39)VALLEYVIEWRDVALLEYVIEWRDD ANENSOAKLAWNRUPPERIRDDRCSIOUXTRGA LWAYDRHARVEYLAPLDUGGA N TRIROQUOIS DRHILLSI DECHAPELLADRENRIDGEVIEWDRYO RKAVESDRNBRITTANYECHAPELYEHLACVALLEYVIEWRD TERFRANCEAVESPLAZAPAIUTENORMANDALERDMCCAU LE Y CHEYENNE JUDSONLA BROOKDRBROOKDRLADR XERXESAVESLAWILFORD TR SCIRDRPLAZADUGGANADRL69THSTTIFTONANTRIMRDWPOINTSHORETRACYAVEBROOKCRESTONCHAPELDAKOTATR69THSTWY69THLTERLALDAWSONLARDA VECORNELIAST69THSTWDRWAYAWSSHANESTPATRICKSLA HILLCRESTABERCROMBIEDRGLEASONCIRDRDRLADUNBERRYSTA TELIMERICKERINSOUTHDALEEVERETTPAIUTECIRNORMANDALERDDRMCGUIRERDMCGUIRERD HWYTERRACEW69üSTVIEW RABUNABERCROMBIECREEKOVERHOLTPASSRDVIEWLAVALLEYVIEWRDDUNBERRY(STATEHWYNO100)NOTIFTON(CORDNO31)LAMARKCHURCHPLVALLEY 169SHAWNEECIRWESTD RDUBLINABERCROMBIE DRPAIUTEDRWOODDALECIRGLEASONMOCCASINVALLEYRDDRTUPASCOTIADR70THSTW70THSTW70THSTW70THSTW70THSTWMARKTERRACEDRSCOTIAMO CCASIN CIRL EEWESTONRDVALLEYSDRDR VALLEY 70THCIRDRWTR DUBLI NVILLAGEDR CIRSTWSANDELLAVECIRANTRIMRDLANHAMLAANDOVERRDTRKERRYLARKSPUR MCCAULEYMAVELLEDRSALLYLAMARKTERRACEDR70THLA XERXESAVESBLVDDRAVEAVE(CORDNO31)CIR(CORDNO17)AVERDHILLAWAYCT(FORMERLYHCSAHNO18,PLAT18)CAHILLRDBRAEBURNMAVELLE COMANCHECTRDGLEASONRDDOWN R D ANTRIM LATUPABELVIDERELAVIEWAVERDRDASPASIATERM A R K VALLEYR DWEXFORDRDDRCORNELIADRVIEWANTRIM T E R R ACE AMUNDSONWESTSHOREMETROBLVDHAZELTONRDHAZELTON(OAKGLENRD)CTLOCHMOOR DRDRLA DOWNRDBRISTOLHEATHERTONGLOUCHESTERCLAREMORECTDRKELLOGGSTATEHWYNO169CLAREMOREDRAVELANHAMLAMARKTERRACEDRNORMANDALERD(STATEHWYNO100)VALLEYVALLEYVIEWRDLYNMARASPASIAWOODDALETRILLIUMFLEETWOODCIRFRANCEAVESAMUNDSONSHANNONCLAREMOREL EEDUNHAMDRDRDRMETROBLVD 72NDSTWLALANTANALADUNHAMDRRDVA L LE Y B RIST OL VDACIRHEATHERTONRL72NDSTW LEWYEIVHILARYLNTRALEEHILARYCIRSHANNONRDGLEASONLNLADRLN DRELLSWORTH(FORMERLYHCSAHNO18,PLAT18)(LEWISSCHEYFRANCEAVESAVEHILARYAVERIDGETRILLIUMDUNHAMPKWY)(STATEHWYNO100)HIBISCUSDRAVEELLSWORTHDR MONARDOLAYORKAVESSHANNONFRONTAGERDWESTSHOREDRFONDELLDRCORNELIADRNORMANDALERD(COVENTRYVIEW)GLOUCHESTERDR73RDSTWCAHILLRDSTATEHWYNO169DRAVEGLEASONRDFONDELLDR KEMRICHTARARDDRPL)WOODDALE(COVENTRYDRBUSHLAKERDLA)(CORDNO31)OAKLAWNG L E ASONR D XERXESAVESPHLOXLA GALLAGHERCLAREDONDR(COVENTRYCORNELIADRGILFORDDRGILFORDDR DEWEYHILLRDDRAVE(COVENTRYCT)DEWEYHILLRDDEWEYHILLRDRDHARRISDEWEYHILL74THST WLAJOHN SHANNONWESTOAKLAWNAVELA)AVEHIBISCUSRDAVEHIBISCUSAVE GALLAGHERDRFRONTAGERD(COVENTRYAVEPARKLAWN PARKCIRAVEPARKLAWN DRIKOLA74THSTWCOVENTRYWAY74THSTWYORKTERLNPARKLAWN BLVDYORKAVESW AY (FORMERLYHCSAHNO18,PLAT18)NORMANDALERDHILARYKELLOGGAVESHANNONCIRDELANEYBLVD XERXESAVESLASHOREDR METRO75TH ST WSEDUMHYDEPARKLA (CORDNO17)CAHILLRD(STATEHWYNO100)FRANCEAVESWESTHYDEPARKDREDINBOROUGHWAYPOPPYLA PARKLAWNCT STATEHWYNO169POP P Y(CORDNO31)GLEASONL ATRBONNIEBRAEDR DRBRAK E 76THSTWLONG76THSTWSHORE WEST ST76THW76THSTWDELANE Y BL V D CTLONGBRAKECIRTR(POND WO ODNORMANDALERDMETROBLVDBRAKEPARKLAWNAVELONG(COBUSHLAKERDBLVD DR)BLVD)CAHILLRDR DSTONEWOODN OGLEASONRD(STATEHWYNO100)31)(WOODVIEWCT)(DELANEYGLASGOWINDUSTRIALTERY O RK AVE S D RWSTEDINA(CORDNO17)EDINAINDUSTRIALBLVD77THSTW77THSTW78THFRANCEAVESEDINBOROUGHWAYRDLAKE CT(DISKDR)LOCHMEREXERXESAVES(OLDSTHWYNO5)BUSHMARTHCTTANGLEWOOD SHAUGHNESSYRDCOMPUTERAVECECILIACIRWST78TH 78THSTWVIKINGDRMINNESOTADRMINNESOTADR 78THSTW (CORDNO169)78THSTW 78THSTW (STATEHWYNO5)INTERSTATEHWYNO494 NORDICCIR INGLEWOOD RDLAKEVIEW INTERSTATEHWY94 TIMBERRIDGECT DREWAVES(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVESFRANCEAVES(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVESWOOD DR END(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVES49THSTWFRANCEAVESFRANCEAVES(CORDNO17)(CORDNO17)FRANCEAVESALDEN42NDSTWEVAAVE42NDSTW BR UCEPL WOODDALEKELLOGGPLAVE41STSTW AVEWOODDALERDESTSHOREDRKELLOGGEDGEBROOK RDWSUNNYSLOPERICHMOND WARWICKCODEAVEKENNEYPLNAOMIDRCIRCLEDROHMSTIFTONDRHANSENRDCIR AMUNDSONAVETUPA HYDE TERGLEASONKRESSEKINGSBERRY SAOENLGCT PASSPAIUTE OLLEB BRORRD Mud Lake Lake Edina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia Arrowhead Lake Highlands Lake Indianhead Lake M elo dy L ake Lake Pamela Hawkes Lake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Minnehaha Creek Nine Mile Creek Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadCity Hall St Peters Lutheran Church & School Fire Station Public Works Grace Church Public Library Concord School Edina Covenant Cornelia School ColonialChurch Highland School CalvaryLutheran Edina High School Our Lady of Grace Church & School Southview Middle School Crossview Lutheran CountrysideSchool St Albans EpiscopalValley View Middle School Creek Valley School NormandaleLutheran Colony Park Baptist St Patricks Catholic Creek Valley Baptist Normandale Elementary St StephensEpiscopal Edina Community Center Golden Years Montessor Calvin Christian School Good Samaritan Methodist Edina Morningside Church Christ Presbyterian Chapel Hills Congregtional Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Edina Community Lutheran Church Fire Station Calvin Christian School SEE DETAIL LEFT CENTER SEE DETAIL UPPER LEFT CAHILL RD & 70TH DETAIL VILLAGE DR CAHILL RDW 70TH ST AMUNDSON AVESEE DETAIL LOWER LEFT Building Height Overlay Districts City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota Appendix A / Planning Dept December, 2013 Legend æ Church ñ City Buildings ¹»Private School ¹ºPublic School HO D-2 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 2 stories or 24 feet, whichever is less. HO D-3 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet, whichever is less. HO D-8 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 8 stories or 96 feet, whichever is less. HO D-9 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 9 stories or 108 feet, whichever is less. HOD-10 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 10 stories or 120 feet, whichever is less. Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 12 stories or 144 feet, whichever is less.HOD-12 HO D-4 Building height shall be determined by required setbacks, but shall not exceed 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is less. VALLEY VIEW RDWOODDALE AVEKELLOGG AVEOAKLAWN AVEBROOKVIEW AVEW 62ND ST VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DETAIL W 49TH ST W 50TH ST W 49 1/2 ST FRANCE AVEW 51ST STHALIFAX AVE50TH & FRANCE DETAIL W 54TH ST FRANCE AVEFULLER ST 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL WILSON RD & EDEN AVE DETAIL ñ EDEN AVE W 50TH ST WILSON RDHWY 100CITY HALL GRANDVIEW DETAIL EDEN AVEVERNON AVEBROOKSIDE AVEARCADIA AVEW 52ND ST W 53RD STGRANDVIEW LAINTERLACHEN BLVD HWY 100GRANDVIEW SQLIN K R D 44TH & FRANCE DETAIL MORNINGSIDE RD W 44TH ST SUNNYSIDE RD FRANCE AVEBUILT FORM AND CONDITIONS METRIC VALUE Average Fair Market Value per Acre ~$850k per acre Average Taxes Capacity per Acre ~$29k per acre Average Parcel Size ~3.5 acres Average Structure size ~29k square feet Total Cahill district Market Value ~$280M Total Cahill district Tax Capacity ~$10M Total Cahill district Area (acres)332 acres Total Cahill Built Square Footage 218K square feet STRUCTURE CONDITION NUMBER OF PROPERTIES Excellent 4 GOOD 176 Average 54 Fair 2 PROPERTY VALUE PER ACRE None Less than $500,000 $500k to $1M $1M to $3M More than $3m PUBLICLY-OWNED PROPERTY SEMI-PUBLIC PROPERTY Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 14 DISTRICT PROFILELOCAL STREETS Other streets serving the District are under City of Edina jurisdiction. The City’s streets with regional significance are West 70th Street, Cahill Road between Dewey Hill Road and West 78th Street, Dewey Hill Road, and West 78th Street. West 70th Street, Cahill Road, and Dewey Hill Road are functionally classified as Major Collectors. West 78th Street is classified as an “A” Minor Arterial Reliever. Other streets and street segments serving the District have local significance. These are: • Minor Collector: Cahill Road between 70th Street and Dewey Hill Road and Metro Boulevard between 70th Street and Edina Industrial Boulevard. • Local Connector: 72nd Street, Ohms Lane, Bush Lake Road, and 74th Street. As collectors and connectors, these streets function to gather and distribute traffic. Thus they are mid- and lower- level facilities that gather traffic from local streets and deliver it to larger, regional roads. In reverse, they gather traffic from the larger, regional roads and deliver it to the local streets. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-17 Figure 5.8: Regional Roadway Functional Classification Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-17 Figure 5.8: Regional Roadway Functional Classification Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-18 Figure 5.9: Local Roadway Functional Classification Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-18 Figure 5.9: Local Roadway Functional Classification REGIONAL ROADWAYS Although outside the study area, I-494 and TH 100 are two, immediately adjacent regional roadways that directly contribute to the movement of people and goods to and from the District. Both are functionally classified as Principal Arterials and, along with TH 62 to the north and US Highway (US Hwy) 169 to the west, provide access between the Cahill District, the region, and points beyond. These regional routes heavily influence the District’s regional position as one of the most important “industry clusters” in the metropolitan area. Because of its proximity to and ease of access to/from the regional routes, the District is a prime location for businesses desiring to attract talent from across the region and for receiving industrial inputs and product shipping. The regional routes, identified as such in the Metropolitan Council’s Metropolitan Highway Plan and the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, are under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY NETWORK OVERVIEW The Cahill District is bordered by West 70th Street to the north, Minnesota Trunk Highway (TH) 100 to the east, West 78th Street and the Edina border with Bloomington to the south, and Cahill Road to the west. Within this area are roadways and streets, transit routes, bicycle paths, and sidewalks and trails; all important facilities that accommodate travel for a variety of transportation modes. This section of the Cahill District plan describes each of these transportation facilities and how each contributes to movement to/ from, within, and through the District.BUSH LAKE RDBUSH LAKE RDOHMS LNOHMS LNMETRO BLVDMETRO BLVD70TH ST70TH ST EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVDEDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD78TH S T 78TH S T DEWEY HILL RDDEWEY HILL RD 74th ST74th STCAHILL RDCAHILL RD Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 15 DISTRICT PROFILEMUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS Cities in Minnesota with populations greater than 5,000 are eligible to receive Municipal State Aid (MSA) funding from the State Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. The purpose of this funding is to help local governments construct and maintain those collector and arterial roadways that have consistent design standards and are well integrated into the overall network of collector and arterial roadways. Edina’s current MSA network within the Cahill District is shown below and includes West 70th Street, Cahill Road, Dewey Hill Road, West 78th Street, and Metro Boulevard. The State Aid office of MnDOT has established clearly defined design requirements for MSA streets. These requirements ensure that capacity, operational, and safety goals are met in a uniform manner from community to community and that street systems are well coordinated with each other. Based on State Statute, MnDOT does not allow cities to restrict truck traffic on local or MSA streets. However, cities may restrict trucks over a certain weight depending on road conditions and time of year. The MSA network is reviewed every year and may be revised subject to MnDOT State Aid review and approval. AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) BY STUDY PERIOD ROADWAY SEGMENT 2009 2015 / 2016 / 2017 2019 70th St West of Cahill Rd 5,645 6,200 * 70th St East of Cahill Rd 9,000 8,700 8,300 Cahill Rd South of 70th St 6,300 5,900 * Cahill Rd North of 78th St 3,800 3,900 6,500 Metro Blvd South of 70th St 6,200 6,600 10,200 Metro Blvd North of Edina Industrial Blvd 5,500 5,900 7,100 Edina Industrial Blvd from Metro Blvd to Bush Lake Rd 8,500 8,900 17,900 78th St West of Bush Lake Rd 12,500 10,200 13,300 78th St East of Bush Lake Rd 4,350 4,250 * Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-23 Figure 5.11: Existing MSA Network Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-23 Figure 5.11: Existing MSA Network Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-23 Figure 5.11: Existing MSA Network DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Average annual daily traffic (AADT) is a measure used to study traffic volumes on a specific segment of a roadway. A segment’s AADT value represents that average number of vehicles that travel on the segment on a given day. The table below shows a comparison of daily traffic volumes over time along key streets in the District. As indicated, daily traffic has positively and negatively fluctuated by modest amounts between 2009 and 2019. Exceptions are: • Cahill Road, between Dewey Hill Road and West 78th Street with a 67 percent increase between 2015 and 2019 • Metro Boulevard, between West 70th Street and West 74th Street; a 55 percent increase between 2016 and 2019 • Industrial Boulevard with a 100 percent increase between 2015 and 2019 The development of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular infrastructure in the Cahill District should consider the potential increase or decrease in traffic volumes as part of feasibility studies for the proposed improvement at hand. FREIGHT The railroad right-of-way that runs north and south through the District is owned by the Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad. It leases the track to the Twin Cities and Western (TC&W) Railroad, which operates freight trains twice each day; one northbound train and one southbound train. There have been discussions in the past about the potential to use the railroad right-of-way for fixed-guideway transit service; either for intercity commuter rail service between Minneapolis and Northfield for an intracity transit circulator. These discussions are not taking place at this time, whereas: • In 2002, the MN legislature adopted the Dan Patch “gag rule” (Laws of Minnesota 2002, chapter 393, section 85), which prohibits the Met Council, MnDOT, and regional rail authorities from taking any action or spending any money for study, planning, preliminary engineering, final design or construction of the Dan Patch commuter rail line. The 2010 (and draft 2015) Statewide Rail Plan identifies the Dan Patch corridor for intercity passenger rail within 20 years. • After conducting a study of the corridor’s potential in Edina, the Edina City Council voted to discontinue any study of passenger rail service along this railroad right- of-way in 2017. However, legislation was introduced in both the Minnesota Senate and House of Representatives to repeal the moratorium in January 2023. These bills are still being debated as of May 2023. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 16 DISTRICT PROFILEPEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Pedestrian facilities are present only on a few street segments in the Cahill District, as shown on in the map to the right. Generally, the District’s transportation infrastructure consists of roads, streets, and parking lots. Public sidewalks have typically been constructed on only one side of some of the streets in the District, if at all. These include facilities on the west side Cahill Road, the south side of West 74th Street, and the west side of Metro Boulevard south of West 74th Street. In addition to the sidewalks themselves, unsafe crosswalks at intersections also create significant gaps in the pedestrian network. As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and subsequent Capital Improvement Planning efforts, improvements and extensions to pedestrian facilities are proposed to and through the Cahill District. The map on the far right shows these proposed facilities. BICYCLE FACILITIES The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, an existing pedestrian and bicycle facility, routes along the northern edge and northeast corner of the District. Before crossing the District, it runs several feet below grade on the north side of West 70th Street and north of existing multi-family buildings. It crosses under West 70th Street in a tunnel and daylights in the northwest corner of the District on City-owned property near Amundson Avenue. Recently, the Three Rivers Regional Park District identified a preferred alignment for a new trail that will run through the District (shown in the image on the far right). The Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail (CP Trail) will traverse six Hennepin County cities, including Edina. This segment of the route will link the existing Nine Mile Creek Regional trail to the Hyland Park Reserve in Bloomington with an alignment along Cahill Road, Dewey Hill Road, Bush Lake Road/Industrial Boulevard, West 78th Street, and East Bush Lake Road. Funding for the CP Regional Trail is yet to be fully acquired. In addition to these two regional trails, the District has a number of other bicycle facilities. On-street bike lanes are present on Cahill Road, West 70th Street, Ohms Lane and West 72nd Street. Bikeable shoulders are also present on Edina Industrial Boulevard and Metro Boulevard.The on-street northbound and southbound bike paths on Cahill Road are striped and identified as bicycle routes. The others that serve the District are not striped and operate on a “share the road” basis. 74th StreetCahill RoadOhms LaneFuture CP Trail Alignment 70th Street 74th StreetCahill RoadOhms LaneFuture CP Trail Alignment Cahill Road On-street bike lanes 70th Street Trail Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail CURRENT & PLANNED BIKE FACILITIES CURRENT & PLANNED PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Existing On-Street Bike Lane Existing Shared-Use Trail Existing Shared-Use Trail Existing Sidewalk Future CP Trail Alignment Future CP Trail Alignment Planned Improvement Planned Improvement Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Future Shared Use Path Existing On- Street Bike Lanes Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 17 DISTRICT PROFILETRANSIT NETWORK Transit routes currently serving the District are provided by Metro Transit and, as shown to the right, include: • All-Day Local Route 6 – All-Day Locals serve all stops and operate throughout the day but may offer less frequent service • Frequent Local Route 540 -- Frequent Locals serve all stops and operate at least every 30 minutes during middays on weekdays and more frequently during rush hours. Evening and weekend service may be less frequent. • Planned Rush-Hour Route 542 – Service is primarily provided during rush hours. (Monday through Friday 6 to 9 AM and 3 to 6:30 PM.) Route 6 is a regular route that runs along West 74th Street and Cahill Road and stops at bus stops adjacent to the study area. Route 540 is a regular route that picks up and drops off passengers at the intersection of Bush Lake Road and West 78th Street. Route 542 is currently suspended; however, Metro Transit plans to recommence service of the route along East Bush Lake Road and West 78th Street. Through field observations it was noted that none of the bus stops on Cahill Road have bus shelters. It was further noted that the locations for the bus stops are inferior and lack sensitivity for the needs of passengers, who are, in fact, pedestrians. The bus stops were located along narrow sidewalks, grassy slopes, and within the splash distance of the curbs. Metro Transit implemented changes to its service plan in response to the COVID pandemic. The most dramatic change was the elimination of express routes, including Route 589, which ran along TH 100 and picked up/dropped off passengers at the Benton Avenue/TH 100 interchange. Prior to the pandemic, Route 578, a local route, operated on West 70th Street. Route 542 was introduced to the District during the pandemic. A A A 852 852 852 852 852 852 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 824 824 824 805 805 805 805 805 804 804 804 804 804 801 801 801 801 801 801 795 795 795 790 790 790 790 790 789 789 785 784 781 781 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 777 776 776 776 776 776 774 774 774 774 774 774 768 768 766 766 766 766 766 766 766 764 764 764 764 764 764 763 763 763 763 761 761 761 761 761 761 760 760 760 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 747 747 747 747 747 747 724 724 724 724 724 724 724 723 723 723 723 723 722 722 722 722 722 721 721 721 717 717 717 716 716 716 716 716 716 716 716 716 705 705 705 705 705 705 705 698 698 698 698 698 698 698 695 695 695 695 695 695 673 673 673 667 667667 667 667 667 645 645 645 645 615 615 615 615 615 615 612612 612 612 612 612 612 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 578 578 578 546 546 546 546 542 542 540540 540 540 540 539 539 539538 538 538 538 538 537 537 537 537 537 534 534 534 534 534 534 515 515 515515 501 499 499 499 499 499 498 498 498 498 498 498 497 497 497 497 497 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 493 493 493 493 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 489 489 489 489 489 484 484 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 479 479 479 479 479 479 477 477 477 477 475 475 475 475 475 475 475 472 472 472 472 472 472 472 472 472 470 470 467 467 467 465 465 460 447 447 447 447 447 447 447 447 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 445 445 445 445 445 445 445 444 444 444444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 436 436 436 436436 436 436 436 Link Link Link Link Link 420420 420 363 363 353 353 353 323 323 323 294 294 294 294 275 275 270 270 270 270 264 264 252 252 252 250 250 250 250 250 227 227 227 227 225 225 225 219 219 219 219 219 219 114 114 114 114 113 113 113 113 113 113 94 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 83 83 83 83 83 83 80 80 80 80 80 75 75 75 75 75 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 7171 71 71 71 71 71 70 70 70 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 65 65 65 65 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 6464 64 64 63 63 63 63 6363 63 63 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 61 61 61 61 6161 61 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 46 46 46 46 46 4646 46 33 33 32 32 323232 32 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 2121 21 21 21 21 2121 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 1717 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 66 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 C C C A BLUE BLUE ORANGE ORANGE GREEN RED RED 763 D D D D CedarGrove 140th 147th Apple ValleyTransit Station Lake/Midtown 50th/Minnehaha VA MedicalCenter Airport -Terminal 1 Airport -Terminal 2 Cedar-Riverside Franklin 38th St 30thAve Fort Snelling AmericanBlvd BloomingtonCentralStadium VillageProspect ParkRaymondWestgateEast BankWest BankFairviewHamlineLexingtonVictoriaDale WesternCapitol/RiceHeart of the City I-35W &BurnsvillePkwy I-35W &66th St Knox &76th St Knox &American I-35W & 46th StStation I-35W & Lake StStation I-35W &98th StStation Xerxes & 56th AveXerxes & 56th Ave Brooklyn &51st AveBrooklyn &51st Ave Penn &43rd Ave Penn &DowlingPenn &Dowling Penn &36th Ave Penn &LowryPenn &Lowry Penn &29th AvePenn &29th Ave Penn &West BroadwayPenn &West Broadway Penn &Golden ValleyPenn &Golden Valley Penn &PlymouthPenn &Plymouth Olson & HumboldtOlson & HumboldtOlson & PennOlson & PennOlson & BryantOlson & Bryant7th St & Olson/5th Ave7th St & Olson/5th AveBrooklynCenterTransitCenter 44th Ave& Girard Fremont& 42nd Ave Fremont& Dowling Fremont& 35th Ave Fremont/Emerson& Lowry Fremont/Emerson& 26th Ave Fremont/Emerson & W Broadway Fremont/Emerson& Plymouth 7th St &Bryant 44th Ave& Penn Chicago& 14th St Chicago& Franklin Chicago& 24th St Chicago& 26th St Chicago& 34th St Portland/Park& 38th St Chicago& 42nd St Chicago& 46th St Chicago& 48th St Chicago& 52nd St Chicago& 56th St Portland& 60th St Portland& 66th St Portland& 70th St Portland& 73rd St Portland& 77th St American& Chicago American & Bloomington American& Thunderbird Snelling & Highland Snelling &County Road B Snelling &Hoyt-Nebraska Snelling &Larpenteur Snelling& Como Snelling& Hewitt Snelling &Minnehaha Snelling& Dayton Snelling& Grand Snelling& St Clair Snelling &Randolph Ford &FairviewFord &KennethFord &Woodlawn 46th St &46th Ave 46th St &Minnehaha Ford &Finn RosedaleTransit Center Snelling46th StFridleyCoon Rapids/Riverdale AnokaLAKE MINNETONKA LAKE MINNETONKA WHITE BEAR LAKE MEDICINE LAKE WESTWOOD LAKE BALD EAGLE LAKE INDEPENDENCE LAKE LONG LAKE MINNEWASHTA LAKE LAKE HARRIET BDE MAKA SKA BUSH LAKE BASS LAKE GERVAIS LAKE ANDERSON LAKE DEAN LAKE TWIN LAKE RONDEAU PHALEN LAKE CEDAR LAKE EAGLE/PIKE LAKE LAKE NOKOMIS HYLAND LAKE LAKE COMO CRYSTAL LAKE LAKE JOSEPHINE PIKE LAKE MOORE LAKE MYSTIC LAKE ANDERSON LAKE TANNERS LAKELAKE OF THE ISLES PENN LAKE HIAWATHA LAKE DIAMOND LAKE SMETANA LAKE NORMANDALE/ NORDMYR LAKE EDINA LAKE CORNELIA LAKE WAKEFIELD GRAY'S BAY WAYZATA BAY BROWNS BAY CATE'S OR HIDDEN LAKE ROUND LAKE CENTENNIAL LAKES M IS S I S S IP PI RIVER MINNESOTA RIVER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MI SSI S SI PPI RIVER C R O W RIVERMI SS ISSIPPI RIVER MINNESOTA R I V E R Hugo Blaine Eagan Grant Orono Corcoran Plymouth Medina Rogers Dayton Woodbury Lino Lakes Shakopee Eden Prairie Edina Maple Grove Cottage Grove Lake Elmo Savage Brooklyn Park Prior Lake Chanhassen Chaska Roseville Victoria Apple Valley Oakdale North St Paul Landfall Shoreview Anoka Louisville Twp Champlin Richfield Golden Valley North Oaks Mound Shorewood Carver White Bear Lake Wayzata Mahtomedi Jackson Twp Hopkins Newport South St Paul Deephaven Dellwood Hanover Centerville Osseo Minneapolis Bloomington Burnsville Minnetonka Coon Rapids Fridley Maplewood Inver Grove Heights Arden Hills Crystal St Louis Park Mendota Heights New Brighton Brooklyn Center Vadnais Heights New Hope West St Paul Little Canada Mounds View St Paul Park Robbinsdale Columbia Heights Hilltop Tonka Bay Circle Pines Falcon Heights St Anthony Lilydale Woodland Gem Lake Excelsior Maple Plain Long Lake Greenwood Minnetonka Beach Pine Springs Spring Park Lauderdale Loretto Mendota Blaine Medicine Lake Rosemount Lakeville ELM CREEK PARK ELM CREEK PARK CROW HASSAN PARK RESERVE CARVER PARK RESERVE U OF M ARBORETUM MORRIS T BAKER PARK RESERVE HYLAND LAKE PARK RESERVE FORT SNELLING STATE PARK MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF LAKE ELMO REGIONAL PARK RESERVE MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF MURPHY-HANREHAN PARK RESERVE US FISH & WILDLIFE PRESERVE BRAEMAR PARK COMO PARK MN VALLEY RECREATIONAL AREA BATTLE CREEK- INDIAN MOUNDS PARK CLEARY LAKE PARK SNAIL LAKE REGIONAL PARK WILD WINGS GAME PRESERVE SPRING LAKE PARK BUNKER HILLS REGIONAL PARK COTTAGE GROVE RAVINE REGIONAL PARK MINNEHAHA PARK BRYANT LAKE PARK RICE CREEK NORTH REGIONAL TRAIL COR BALD EAGLE- OTTER TAIL REGIONAL PARK CLIFTON E FRENCH REGIONAL PARK MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF BREDESEN PARK EDENVALE PARK LAKE MINNEWASHTA FREGIONAL PARK LOCKE PARK FORT SNELLING STATE PARK CROSBY FARM REGIONAL PARK ALIMAGNET PARK LONE LAKE PARK TERRACE OAKS WEST PARK MILLER PARK PURGATORY PARK HAMLET PARK TURTLE LAKE CO PARK THEODORE WIRTH PARK PIONEER PARK CENTRAL PARK EDENBROOK CONSERVATION AREA NEILL PARK LOCHNESS PARK HIGHLAND PARK BIG ISLAND PARK HIGHLAND PARK LAKEWOOD HILLS PARK HENNEPIN CO PARK PRESERVE KINGSTON PARK VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK PARK MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF NORTHVIEW PARK BOUNDARY CREEK PARK WOODRIDGE PARK MARSH LAKE PARK ANDREWS PARK EAST CREEK CANYON PARK CENTRAL PARK OXBOW CREEK PARK SCHWARZ POND PARK CARROLLS WOODS PARK PLYMOUTH CREEK PARK HERITAGE PARK BALDWIN PARK RUSTIC HILLS PARK RIDGECLIFFE PARK AFTON HEIGHTS PARK VALLEY PARK GEORGE OHMANN PARK PINE GLEN PARK PALMER LAKE PARK HEARTHSIDE PARK HIGHWOODS PARK LAKE OWASSO CO PARK CANTERBURY PARK LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF INT CENTER 4th Ave Valley In d u s t r i a l B l v d N Valley In d u s t r i a l B l v d S Co Rd 101 17th Ave17th Ave St Francis Ave Round Lake BlvdCrooked Lake BlvdCahillCahill AveCollege Trail 89th Hiawa tha A ve Eagle C r e e k Egan Dr 134th 12th ChippendaleBurmaBumleySt Paul Ave Ford PkwyVandalia 101st Ave Egret 95th Ave WescottMitchell RdPreserve BlvdCanterbury RdCanterbury RdMystic Lake DrDiffleyBudd AveC o n c o r d Plato Blvd Bayfield Wa b a s h a S t J a c k s o n R o b e r t S t R o b e r t S t S t P e t e r MNCed a r 28th AvePeony LnConway Dowling Maple ShadywoodShakopee Ave PennockAuto Club Br o d e r i c kCartway RdBusiness Park BlvdParkParkPortlandWinifred2 1/2Uni v e r s i t y 4th S t 5th S t Wa s h i n g t o n Henne pi n Highwood Golden TriangleIdaho NiagaraValley ParkRobert TrailOpperman Greenbrier RdXenium LnBonnevista DrWe a v e r L a k e R d 85th Ave Galaxie Galaxie4th St 5th St 3rd3rdSmith 22nd Ave20th Ave 42nd 56th St 4th St 62nd Pl 77th Ave 65th 65th 36th St 31st 37th Ave 140th 127th 140th 145th St 154th St 94th St 86th 28th St 26th 25th St 32nd Park View 2nd 60th St 60th St GarrettJamaica119th Ave 124th North Rd Cahill Rd4th Ave 140th140th 89th Main M a i n G r e e n H a v e n Harrison Main StMain St 6th St7th St12th St11th St10thKellogg Blv d 93rd 125th Ja c o b 89th Ave Zachary86th St86th St 117th Ave 97th Ave 26th Ave 84th St 143rd 141st 93rd AveMaple Grove PkwyB r o o k l y n B l v d L a k e l a n d 77th St 14 0 t h 80th4th Ave20th12th Ave4th Ave3rd Ave2nd1st Cedar AveCedar AveCedar AveCedar AveCeda r A v e MarschallWestonMarschall RdIndependence AveSarazinMarschall RdHodgson35th St 34th St Troy LnNobleShoreline Dr Shoreline Dr DaleDaleDaleOaklandSmithRobertStrykerBerry InwoodWhite Bear AveWhite Bear AveWhite Bear AveDivisionTechnology Dr Rockford Rd Diamond PathBrownWe s t R i v e r R d Old Shakopee Stillwater Blvd 138th 136th Nicollet Blvd EvergreenXerxesBarrieYork XerxesXerxesXerxesNew Brighton BlvdCrestCo Rd 18N Shor e Dr ClevelandCo Rd 3 8 Thompson Southview Blvd Grand Armour Hardman Conco rd Thompson Marie 3rd St Butler Mendota Rd 24th AveHumboldt Valley View Rd Upp e r A f t o n Oa k AdamsO s s e o R d 44th Ave McAndrewsSpencerFullerFullerAtwoodHolmes Kenzie TerraceNorth St Co Rd 29H a d l e y Grant 40th Ave 40th Co Rd 42 Co Rd 42 140th C o R d 4 2 Southcro s s 160th StPennPenn OliverUpton Penn Eag l e C r e e k B l v d Rice StRice 150th St 157th 155th 150th 153th Whitney 147th 147th St 147th St 142nd St 145th 1st Ave 125th 85th Ave UniversityUniversity AveEagl e C r e e k B l v dCo Rd 19Lake StLake Townline Rd Hayden Lake Rd Northdale Blvd N o r t h d a l e S t Co m o Ave RaymondRound Lake BlvdNorthland Dr32nd Ave Shelard Pk w y Ford R d ChestnutJonathan Carver PkwyIronwood V ierling Dr Arbo r e t u m B l v d Prairi e C enter Dr Anderson Lake s P kwy Herrgott Memorial DrB a s s Lake Rd BloomingtonAir p o r t OhioLivingstonChesterLafayetteFillmor e Mo u n d s B l v d BellowsAllenRobert5th Ave5th AveCarmenWentworth Carmel Livingston M a rie Babcock Tr 55th Upper 55th Alta54th MarieDelaware Ames CrossingDodd RdGeorge CharltonOrme Oakdale 65th S t 67th St 70th St 75th St 78th St 80th St80th St ClaytonDawnConcord BlvdConcordDawn WayConcord Exchange Dodd RdLexington21st Glen 15th 7th AveHastingsPullman LincolnHinton85th W P o i n t D o u g l a sIvystoneLower Afton Bielenberg DrSilver Bell Duckwood LexingtonDenmarkElrene Dodd RdYankee Doodle Town Centre DrLexingtonPromenade BraddockLone Oak GeminiEagandale Corporat e Cen ter Pilot KnobPilot KnobCentral PkwyCoachmanLetendre Quarry Yankee Doodle DonaldB lue Cross Rd Cliff Pilot Knob RdFlagstaffGalaxieBlackhawkNicolsRahnDodd RdBlue G e nti a n Dodd RdLondin Ln QueensPilot Knob RdBlaineMendota H e i g h ts In dian 123rdLinco ln BrenBren Yellow Circle Red Circle 39th St Blake TylerVan Buren AveR ic h field 5thMainstreet 5th Minn e t o n k a Mills R d Shady OakK-T e l 11th AveOpportunityWashingtonSmetana Dr11th12th AveGreenOakShady Oak Co Rd 3 Co Rd 3 34th AveC o R d 3 Hutchins PorterScenic HeightsBakerVine HillOld MarketCo Rd 19 C o Rd 1 9 E x c e lsior M inn e to n k a B l vd Antrim FranloBuckingh a m LindenSibley Memorial Hwy River Hills Cliff 122nd Parkwood NicolletCo Rd 5Co Rd 5Burnsville PkwyRed Cherry Lane V a lley V iew Delton Shady Oak Stillwater Broadway St 8th AveSilver Lake RdSilver Lake RdSilver Lake RdSilver Lake Rd7th St 1st Ave8th St Old Hwy 8Old Hwy 8Foss Chandl er Ka s o ta Gortner EustisLarpenteur Larpenteur LarpenteurLarpenteurLarpenteurHennepin Guider Vall e y C r e e k R d Tamarack Franklin Ave 33rd Ave 29th 37th Ave 37th PlCo Rd D Terminal RdLong LakeLong LakeArdan NaplesFlowerfield Lovell LexingtonLexingtonElm Sunset AveUni v e r s i t y Terr i t o r i a l Transitway UniversityUniversity Thomas MarionJohn Ireland BlvdSelby Selby Minnehaha Ave HamlineHamlinePascalPascalPascalLincoln DrHamlineFront Co m o 3rd St Wilson Hudson Suburban McKnight RdMcKnight RdHazelFerndaleHadleyHadleyIdeal AveRuth StRuthHowardHudson Rd 7th St 10th St 12th St G e n t r y HudsonCenturyCentury CenturyCenturyWesternRiceRiceRiceJacksonL’OrientSycamore Brainer d Iona Ln Twin Lakes Pkwy Commerce Woodhill Dr Lydia Arbogast Owasso Blvd N Harriet KentRoselawn RoselawnDesoto Buford CarterCleveland Midway Pkwy Hoyt Spring Minnehaha Minnehaha Stillwater RdStillwat er Bl v d E 7th St NokomisEnglishLarpenteur Hwy 120MargaretHolloway Benet GenevaBeebe7th Ave11th Ave 12th AveMcKnight RdBellaireLydia ArcadeArkwrightAtlanticCase Cayuga Maryland Maryland Maryland ArlingtonArlington McMenemyE 7th St3rd StBurrSkillman HazelwoodSouthlawnBeam Co Rd C Co Rd B Co Rd B2Co Rd B2 Co Rd C Co Rd C2 Co Rd D Co Rd E Co Rd E Co Rd E Co Rd F Co Rd F Co Rd 96 Co Rd C Co Rd BEdgertonEdgerton StEdgertonPayneCentervilleLabore Rose S t il l w ater Ave EdgewaterIvy 15th St GreenwayProsperityWhite Bear AveCounty LineStewart AveMahtomediWildwood Hwy 120WarnerVictoriaPacific EarlBurns Upper Afton 47th St Little Canada Rd Demont Ave Market Pl DrVictoriaVictoriaTanglewoodVictoriaHodgson Energy Park Dr 95th Dunkirk9th LnOld Rockford Rd North Shore DrBayside Rd Madison Monroe5th AveRiverdale DrRiver RapidsCo o n R a p i ds B lvd Eas t Riv er Rd Co o n R a p i d s B l v dHanson BlvdEgret 123rd Robinson 113th 121st Ave W est River Rd 109th Ave NathanBou n dary Creek ZacharyRevereCentral93rd AveCo Rd 30 Co R d 8 1 Elm CreekWest Fish Lake RdLawndale LnVicksburgHemlock LnMain StHemlock FoleySpringbrook85th 85th Ave Nort h d a l e Territ o r i a l R dFole y PolkN o r t h d a l e 105th A v e 89th Ave 85th 87t h MonroeJeffersonEast Ri ver Rd Central AveSpring LakeUniversity AveMain StCo Rd H Co Rd H2 Co Rd JCo R d 1 0 CentralLake Stinson BlvdOak St27th Ave15th Ave Stinson BlvdMcKinley18th Ave 39th Riv e r s i d e Washington10th8th S t S E BroadwayW Broadway Plymouth Olson EmersonLyndaleWashingtonFremontFremont XerxesFrance 1st Ave Johnson1s t S t 2 n d S t 26th 33rd 51st Ave Brooklyn B lvd 53rd Ave 57th Ave Bass Lake Rd 65th 69th Ave BryantSh i n g l e C r e e k D rDupontDupontLoganPenn49th AveXerxesXerxes HumboldtXerxes 63rd Ave63rd Ave Brooklyn Blvd 79th 77th Ave 93rd Ave XylonWyoming ZaneZaneZaneHampshireDouglasBroadway80th Ave Brookdale Dr WoodbineWelcomeNoble Halifax France71st Ave 73rd Ave73rd Ave 73rd Ave 69th Ave 74th Ave 109th AveJefferson ElmRollins Como C o m o A v e W a s h i n g t o n 7t h S t 2nd St7thMonroeWashington NELowry 26th St 16th St Park PlBarry Lowry Lowry Cedar L a k e R dWisconsinMendelssohnHillsboroLouisiana Glenwood Lagoon CentralCentralReservoirArthur44th AveFrontage Rd53rd Ave Osborne 81st Ave Oak d a l e 27th Ave 29th 31st Excelsior BlvdCo Rd 2 5 W B r o a dw a yW B r o a d w a y NobleLakeFrance42nd Ave Douglas DrDouglas DrWe s t B r o a d w a yHampshire 65th 67th Ave 71st Ave WinnetkaWinnetkaWinnetkaLouisianaGrandColumbiaSt Anthony KnoxMedicine Lake Rd Duluth St Olympia 36th Ave36th Ave 36th Ave 8th NBrookdale Dr 85th Ave 83rd Ave Shingle Creek Pkwy University AveUniversity AveUniversity AveGardena Wayza t a B l v d Wayzata Blvd BarryO a kland Ridgedale Carlson P kw yWest River Rd95th RussellHedberg DrHopkins CrossroadCo Rd 73M i n n e t o nka B l v d Minnetonka Blvd Excelsior Bl v dCo Rd 146Co Rd 51 Co Rd 1 5 Sh orelin e D r 66th Ave Golden V all e y R d Orchard TrentonBass Lake Rd BooneBooneNathan Nathan LnZacharyKilmer LnPineview Ln 54th Ave 46th 45th 36th AveSchmidt L a k e R d L a ncast e r Me d i c i n e L a k e B l v d Plymouth A v eFernbrookVicksburg CarlsonDunkirkDunkirkRanchview Northwest BlvdCo Rd 6 34th Me d i n a Co Rd 9 North west Blv d QuinwoodCo Rd 101Co Rd 6 CentralFernbrook Ln37th 36th Harbor 117th Ave Co Rd 19 Min n e t o n k a Blvd 10th Ave 63rd Ave 59th Ave Betty C r o c k e r D r Schmidt Lk R d Xeon StCoon Ra pid s Blvd Minneh ah a A ve 42nd Ave54th St 56th St 42nd AveGrandGrandNicollet Nicollet NicolletGarfieldNicollet46th46th 28th Ave 34th Ave 54th St Sunrise DrHwy 12142nd St 42nd St 23rd Ave28th Ave58th St36th AveFranklin Franklin 16th StDouglas LyndaleLyndaleChicagoChicagoCedarCedar27th Ave26thMinnehaha A ve 24th St 29th Bloomington4th Ave3rd AveStevens Blaisdell 50th St 44th 47th 48th 54th 66th St 66th St66th St 69th St 38th 38th 39th 36th 35th 38th StBryant BryantHennepinSt Clair Fairview FairviewPriorFairviewDavernSnellingSnellingSnellingSnellingClevelandW 7th StGannonSheridanCleveland Montreal Norfolk Randolph Randolph Jefferson St Pau l A ve W 7th StMarshallCretin CretinGrand Grand LexingtonLexingtonLexingtonLexington PennKnoxKnoxPenn70th St Hazelton 70th St American Blvd 90thChowenAbbott47th 48th DrewFranceFranceFr an c e American Blvd PortlandPortlandValley View 82nd St82nd 81st St 82nd Portland12th Ave12th AveBloomington77th St 76th St 76th St 76th 84th Edinborough WayLyndaleLyndaleLyndaleParklawn Ave Gallagher Dr Minnesota Dr France Johnson FranceFrance Lindau Old Cedar30th99th St 78th 82nd 84th 104th St 106th St Metro 74th St Old Shakopee Dewey Hill Rd E Bush LkPennJamesPoplar Bridge 94th NesbittNormandale BlvdNorman Center Dr98th St 98th St 98th St 98th St 102nd St 108th StBloomington Ferry Bush Lake Killebrew Normandale LK BlvdCo Rd 28StanleyBloomington Ferry Eden 50th 44th W Bush LkDiamond Lake Rd Cesa r C h a v e z (Con c o r d ) White B ear AveWestminsterWestminsterT ra v e le rs T rlCandlewood Dr Shingle Cre e k PkwyW BroadwayJolly LnRidgedale Dr WaterGreat Plains Blvd Market BlvdValley V i e w R d 10th Ave 11th Ave Smetana Rd Lone Oak PkwyJohnny Cake Ridge Rd Cedar Lake R d Minnetonka Blvd 36th St Cambridge St 36th St Mo n t e r e yQuent in Lake St Lake LakeExcelsior Blvd 37th Fairfield Beltline BlvdSheridanHennepinSheridanTransit w a y C edar G rove Pkw y S o u t h v i e w Laurel Old Shak o p e e Bass Lake Rd Vernon W e s t R i v e r R d Oak G r o v e P k w y Wayzata Blvd Garden View DrCo Rd 11Embr y Pat hLad P k wy Wayzata Blvd 45th 113th Ave Mississippi Blvd111th Hewitt S Park Dr QuebecPennsylvania C o R d 101 S hen andoah DrCo Rd 14 Stagecoach RdC rossings BlvdCo Rd 21Cedar La ke A ve69th 62nd OptumCedar La k e R d 50th StN e il Arm strongGolden V alle y Rd Vernon Lynn QuentinVikin gs PkwyWallaceFlying Cl o u d Dr Valley Creek Rd Colleg e v i ewCargo M c A n d rewsAldrichBurnhaven BurnhavenCrystal Lake Dr GreenhavenCainTerrit o r i a l R d Trail HavenLarkin Harff BechtoldStrehler R o g e r s Horseshoe 93rd Hassan Pkwy Stieg To w n H a l l O a k d a l e QueenKalkMohawkRolling HillsWood Ln Chippewa Meister Old S e t t l e r s TomahawkRebecca P a r k Willandale RdJubertTessmer TrailCo R d 1 0Main StValley DrHomestead 109th Ave Co Rd 50 Chippewa Salem WillowPioneer141st Brockton LnBrockton LnCo Rd 116Woodland Co Rd 19Park DrIn d u s t r i a l Fletcher LnSylvan Lak e R d RosedaleTucker Rd ArrowheadCo Rd 116Co Rd 30 Co Rd 50 Co Rd 10Pioneer 129th N Tucker RdCainBrocktonOakdale 97th Woodland Trail Pioneer Trail Pion e e r T r a i l Hackamore Co Rd 101117th Ave 125th Ave S Diamond Lake RdZanzibar LnLawndale Ln105th NFrench Lake 121st Ave Pineview LnValley Forge LnFrench L a k e R dVinewood Ln133rd Ave Day t o n R d 124th Ave DunkirkN Diamond Lake Rd Territo rial Rd HollyFernbrook Ln129th Ave Elm Cree k R d 142nd Ave French Lake Territ o r i a l Elm Troy54th Co Rd 47 Ba s s L a k e R d WillowIndependenceHunterBeckerHoly NameSpring H i l lWillow 12th Hamel WayzataParkviewCo Rd 19 Co Rd 24 Perkinsville H o me st ead Tr ai l M e d in a HunterTamarack6th N 6th N Co Rd 24 FerndaleWate r t o w n North Arm Old Crystal BayMcculley Main WatertownCo Rd 6 Co R d 6 T o n k a w a FoxHalgren Co Rd 1106th N Town LineWest Branch Moline North Arm Edgewood Co Rd 44Birch Bluff Sm i t h t o w n Gleason LakeCo Rd 101Lake McGin t y Mc G i n t y Breezy Pt VicksburgCedar Lake Rd LakeLakeWilliston S hady O ak Rd BakerGalpin BlvdArboretum Blvd BakerAudubon RdHazeltine Blvd192nd Ave82nd St 82nd St Lyman Blvd Lyman Blvd Church Lake Blvd Victoria DrM i l l Bavaria RdMcKnight RdHazeltine BlvdRolling Acres RdMinnewashta PkwyCo Rd 62 Co Rd 4 Lake Lucy Rd Co Rd 101Vine HillEden Prairie Powers BlvdDell RdD u c k L a k e T r a i l 78th St Bren C h e s t n u t B v d Engler Mars h L a k e R d Pione e r T r a i l Bl u f f C r e e k D r Pioneer Trail Pioneer Trai l Flying Clo u d D r Eden Prairie RdShady OakPione er Tr ail Co Rd 140 Chaska Blvd Dell RdHighway 13Eagl e C r e e k A v e Mccoll Chaska Blvd Akers 175th Xanadu180th 182nd 180th 180thHarlow Ave5th Ave 145th St Johnson Memorial DrPuebloFairlawn154th 165th RevereNatchezMarschall RdMarystown RdMarystown RdDakotaTownline AveTownline AveBaseline AveMurphy LakeOld Brick Yard RdE a g l e C r e e kKoeper AveZumbro AveZumbro Ave173rd AllenCleary Lake 150th St 170th St Co Rd 2 8 2 Country Trail Langfor d Blv d Co Rd 72 Co Rd 78 Co Rd 42 160th 130th StAudubon RdVierl in g D rHoward Lake RdDa k o t ah Pkwy HighlandWoodlandTonkawoodWillistonCovington Powers BlvdCo Rd 30 101st N Lawndale LnCo Rd 19109thHanson BlvdXanthus LnXylite99th Ave7th Ave101st Lake DrNaples St105th Ave Bunker Lake Radisso n 38th Ave St Fr anci s Blvd 131st Ave Bunker Lake Blvd Coon Creek FoleyC o R d 5 2 Bunker Lake Blvd RadissonNorthdale Blv dLake Dr20thBirch Ot te r Lake RdJamaicaVa d n a i s B l v d MainMain Centerville12th AveHolly Birch Ash Elmcrest Dell w o o d R d De l l w o o d A v e Quail80thHickory 75th KeatsTurtle Lake 2nd AveCo Rd H2 Co Rd F Co Rd 96 Lk Blvd N Goose Lake R d 9th StOtter ViewBald Eagle AveEagleOtter LakeHwy 96Centerville Rd CentervilleLake DrEas t O a ks Pleasant Lake Pleasant Lake East Oaks Bi r c h White Bear Pkw y Co Rd J South Shore Blvd Frenchma n Cedar 47th NLexington 40th StArcade St50th St 50th St Milit a r y Glen Oakridge RadioBailey Mil i t a r y 65th InwoodWoodburyValley Creek HintonKeatsBailey Dale WoodlaneRadio DrRadio DrWoodlane70th Old HudsonHudson Rd WoodburyIdeal10th St 15th St S k y w a y CenturyCarver Ave Linwood Pouliot Up p e r A ft o n Warner BabcockRed Rock Rd Amana L a k e R d 96th 80th St KeatsSterling StConcord BlvdBroadway 9th Portland80th Lone Oak 70th St Jamaica MargaretParkway Arlington J ohnson PkwyWheelock Pk wy Pilot Knob RdShannonShannon PkwyChippendaleConnemaraConnemaraDodd Rober t T ra i l 142nd 160th St Diamond PathShepard RdDodd BlvdDodd Blvd170th CliffSibley Memorial Hwy Argenta Shepard RdSibley Memorial Hwy Cliff 165th 12th130th 172nd 185th 122nd 126th 162nd McAndrews Cliff Isleton 160th 157th Diffley Pilot KnobCo Rd 11Johnny Cake Ridge HayesCo Rd 11Mckenna RdRiverview 90th New Brighton BlvdPioneer Trail Homeward HillsValley V i ew ClevelandRoselawn Co Rd B Co Rd C West River Pkwy Minn e ha ha Pkwy N okomis Pkwy 86th W B u s h Lake E Bush Lake Highwood S t Anthony Blvd Flying Cloud Dr Bot t ine au B l vd Bot t ineau B l vd Transfer RdWestern AveRoselawn VictoriaWe st Bro a d w ay Northwest BlvdSummit Interlachen Blvd BlakeOli n g e r 78th St 78th Ave 99th Ave N Weaver Lake 85th Elm Creek Blvd/77th Ave Plymouth Medin a Carlson P k wy 101st AveWinnetkaDouglas109th Ave Noble PkwyRegent61st 73rd Ave Mississippi St 49th Ave Fairway Co Rd E Lake Joh a n na Bl v d FairviewSnail Lake BlvdHamline AveCo Rd DLexington Owasso Blvd WCo Rd I HodgsonFoley BlvdOliveMarshall Front C o m o Energy Park Dr Summit 46th AveMarshall6th S t 7th S t 8th S t 28th St LyndalePortland50th St Eden Prairie RdMarshall East River Rd East Ri ver Rd EgretCo R d 116 Bunker Lake Blvd Pleasant 7th AveGramsie Frost Co Rd B North St PaulEdgertonBoydHarknessStillwat er R d PedersenWeirHelenMcKnight Rd17th Ave Beam H a s t i n g s Hadley E P o i n t D o u g l a s Yankee Do o d le 3rd S t 4th S t 5th 3rd AvePortland Ave5th Ave4th Ave2nd AveMarquetteParkChicagoNicollet MallHennepin 1st Ave2nd Ave3rd Ave12th S t La k e s h o r e Highland Pkwy BeardW Me d i c i n e L a ke Xenium LnCampusHumboldtCheshire54th AveAnnapolis52nd A v e LongfellowEast R iver Rd EdgcumbeMinnesota Bl uffs DrFerryCity W P k wyTexas AveQuincyThurstonM o u n ds Vie w B lv d L’Or i ent Eagan City Hall Oakwoodsof Eagan Thomson Reuters Ecolab Signal Hills Center HumboldtHigh School Walmart Arbor Pointe Fort SnellingNational Cemetery National Sports Center Anoka Co Human Service Center NorthtownMall Mercy Hospital - Unity Campus Fridley High School HighlandVillage Sibley PlazaVAMedicalCenter Valley WestShopping Center Minneapolis - St Paul International Anoka Co/Blaine Airport Crystal Airport St Paul DowntownAirport South St Paul Airport Flying Cloud Airport WellsFargo CentennialSr HighSchool ShoreviewCommunity Center Medtronic Crystal Center Maplewood Mall CenturyCollege West M Health FairviewSt John's Hospital Tamarack Village 3MHq HardingHigh School Washington Tech Magnet School Johnson High School Ramsey CoCorrectional Facility WoodwindsHealth Campus EdenPrairie Center Century CollegeEast Super Target LandO’ Lakes Deluxe DeluxeCorp Hq Medtronic Cub Foods Hamline University Macalester College Cretin-Derham Hall High School Highland ParkHigh School Concordia University CentralHigh School Montreal Hi-Rise United Hospital Allianz Field AnokaTechnical College MercyHospital University of St Thomas St CatherineUniversity MinnesotaVeterans Home Rasmussen College Hennepin Technical College Valleyfair Target Safe Havenfor Youth Mystic Lake Casino Burnsville Center M Health Fairview Apple ValleySquare Minnesota Zoo St Francis Regional Medical Center Court House Cub Foods Canterbury Park Lowes WorkforceCenter Amazon Southbridge Crossing Middle School Junior High School CommunityCenter ShakopeeHigh School Town Square Mall NormandaleCommunity College PreserveVillage Mall JeffersonHigh School Normandale Village Inver HillsCommunityCollege Simley High School Dunwoody College Anoka Ramsey CommunityCollege North Hennepin Community College Walmart Maple GroveTransit Station Fountains at Arbor Lakes Prudential Hennepin Technical College Mpls Instituteof Arts South High School Abbott Northwestern Children’s WashburnHigh School RooseveltHigh SchoolPark NicolletMedical Center SW High School M HealthFairview SouthdaleHospital SouthdaleCenter SouthtownCenter Best Buy HQ EdinboroughPark Richfield High School Cedar PointCommons Cub Foods CubFoods Kennedy HighSchool Methodist Hospital Shoppes at Knollwood GeneralMills Honeywell Cedar Trails Condominiums Regency Hospital North Memorial Health Hospital RidgedaleCenter Carlson Center Minnetonka Heights Apts Super Target CubFoods Minnetonka Library MinnetonkaCity Hall U of M St PaulCampus HealthPartnersHuntington Bank Stadium Augsburg University M HealthFairview M HealthFairview State Fair Grounds RosedaleMall HarMar Mall SuperTarget Roseville High School Como ParkHigh School RosevilleCity Hall Silver LakeVillage TheQuarry Edison High School North CommunityHigh School Patrick Henry High School Brooklyn Center High School WinnetkaShoppingCenter New HopeCity Hall YMCA Honeywell UPS Eagan HighSchool OakdaleCity Hall Hillcrest Center NorthHigh School RiverdaleCrossing Anoka-Metro Regional Treatment Center Target North Campus Universityof MinnesotaUniversityof Minnesota Trailhead FedEx UPS Louisiana AveTransit Center StarliteTransit Center RobbinsdaleTransit Center Columbia HeightsTransit Center UptownTransit Station Chicago-LakeTransit Center Little CanadaTransit Center Maplewood MallTransit Center Sun RayTransit Center BurnsvilleTransitStation SouthdaleTransit Center SouthWestStation SouthWestVillage Marschall RdTransit StationCarverStation East CreekStation Station 73Park & Ride NorthtownTransit Center EaganTransit Center Mall of AmericaTransit Station Terminal 1TransitCenter Downtown St Paul Downtown Minneapolis 294 LONG LAKE LILY LAKE MCKUSICK LAKE MCDONALD CLOVERDALE LAKE Bayport Stillwater Oak Park Heights Bayport Stillwater Oak Park Heights Mu lbe rr y Water StMa i n Market4th StMy rt le 3rdParisOlive GreeleyPine Curve C re stCo Rd 5Churchill OrleansOrleans Stillwater BlvdMannin gNorthbrookNealMain80th StagecoachOsgoodMckusick 47 th 50th Olinda 40th St S t o n e b r i d g e OwensBou t well Manning50th St Stillwater Detail To Ramsey, Elk River and Big Lake (see Northstar inset map) To Forest Lake and Columbus To Stillwater (see detail map) TRANSIT INFORMATION: metrotransit.org | 612-373-3333 This map is an overview of regional transit routes. Each route has a number and routes are grouped by when and how frequently they operate. Route numbers appear in signs above windshields and each route has its own printed schedule. Printed schedules include detailed maps and schedule information. They are available at Metro Transit service centers and select retail outlets. Call 612-373-3333 to have a schedule mailed to you. You may also view and print them at metrotransit.org. Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Transit System Map Effective: 12/3/22 To Becker and St. Cloud Park & Rides 169 101 94 10 10 10 25 887 Northstar Link Bus N o r t h s t a rBig LakeBig LakeRamseyRamseyElk RiverElk RiverAlbertville St Michael Monticello Rogers Dayton Elk River Otsego Ramsey Big Lake Co Rd 43171st Ave CROW HASSAN PARK RESERVE Miles 0 1 2 Northstar Commuter Rail 000 000 000 Frequent Local Buses Serve all stops and operate at least every 30 min. during middays on weekdays, more often during rush hours. Evening and weekend service may be less frequent. All-Day Local Buses Serve all stops and operate throughout the day but may offer less frequent service. All-Day Express Buses Limited-stop or non-stop service that operates throughout the day on weekdays but may offer less frequent service. Rush-Hour Buses Service is primarily during rush hours. (M-F 6:00-9:00 am and 3:00-6:30 pm) Non-stop Service Buses do not stop to pick up or drop off customers on these route segments. Limited Service Only certain trips take this route segment. Northstar Commuter Rail Operates rush-hour service on weekdays only. Trains stop at all stations shown. METRO Blue Line Trains stop at all stations shown. METRO Green Line Trains stop at all stations shown. METRO Orange Line Buses stop at stations on demand. METRO Red Line Buses stop at stations on demand. METRO A Line, C Line & D Line Buses stop at stations on demand. Point of Interest Park & Ride Lot Hospital Transit Center/Station 000 A AA852852852852852852850850850850850850850824824824805805805805805804804804804804801801801801801801795795795790790790790790789789785784781781777777777777777777777777776776776776776774774774774774774768768766766766766766766766764764764764764764763763763763761761761761761761760760760755755755755755755755755755747747747747747747724724724724724724724723723723723723722722722722722721721721717717717716716716716716716716716716705705705705705705705 698 698 698 698 698 698 698 695 695695 695 695 695673673673667667667667667667645645645645615615615615615615612612612612612612612 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 578 578 578 546 546 546 546 542 542 540540 540 540 540 539 539 539538 538 538 538 538 537 537 537 537 537 534 534 534 534 534 534 515 515 515515 501 499 499 499 499 499 498 498 498 498 498 498 497 497497 497 497 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 493 493 493 493 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 490 489 489 489 489 489 484 484 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 479 479 479 479 479 479 477 477 477 477 475 475 475 475 475 475 475 472 472 472 472 472 472 472 472 472 470 470 467 467 467 465 465 460 447 447 447 447 447 447 447 447 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 445 445 445 445 445 445 445 444 444 444444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 442 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440440440 440 436 436 436 436436 436 436 436 Link Link Link Link Link 420420 420 363 363 353353 353323323323294 2942942942752752702702702702642642522522522502502502502502272272272272252252252192192192192192191141141141141131131131131131139487878787878787838383838383808080808075757575 75 7474 74 747474747474747474747474717171717171717171 71 71 7171 71 71717171 707070686868686868686868 68 6868 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 67 67 67 6767 67 6765656565 64 6464646464646464646463636363636363636262626262626262626262616161616161615454545454545454 54 54 5454464646464646464633333232323232323030303030302525252525252525252525252323232323232322222222222222222222222121212121212121 18 18 18181818 18 17171717171717 17 171717171414141414141414 14141414 141111111111111110101010 101099999 99997 77777 7 7 76666 66 6 6 6 6 6655555444444 4 4 4 4 33 3 3 333222222CCCABLUE BLUE ORANGE ORANGE GREEN RED RED 763DD D D CedarGrove 140th 147th Apple ValleyTransit Station Lake/Midtown 50th/Minnehaha VA MedicalCenter Airport -Terminal 1 Airport -Terminal 2 Cedar-RiversideFranklin 38th St 30thAve Fort Snelling AmericanBlvd BloomingtonCentralStadium VillageProspect ParkRaymondWestgateEast BankWest BankFairviewHamlineLexingtonVictoriaDale WesternCapitol/RiceHeart of the City I-35W &BurnsvillePkwy I-35W &66th St Knox &76th St Knox &American I-35W & 46th StStationI-35W & Lake StStation I-35W &98th StStation Xerxes & 56th AveXerxes & 56th AveBrooklyn &51st AveBrooklyn &51st Ave Penn &43rd AvePenn &DowlingPenn &DowlingPenn &36th AvePenn &LowryPenn &Lowry Penn &29th AvePenn &29th AvePenn &West BroadwayPenn &West BroadwayPenn &Golden ValleyPenn &Golden ValleyPenn &PlymouthPenn &Plymouth Olson & HumboldtOlson & HumboldtOlson & PennOlson & PennOlson & BryantOlson & Bryant7th St & Olson/5th Ave7th St & Olson/5th AveBrooklynCenterTransitCenter 44th Ave& Girard Fremont& 42nd AveFremont& DowlingFremont& 35th Ave Fremont/Emerson& LowryFremont/Emerson& 26th AveFremont/Emerson & W BroadwayFremont/Emerson& Plymouth 7th St &Bryant44th Ave& Penn Chicago& 14th StChicago& FranklinChicago& 24th StChicago& 26th St Chicago& 34th StPortland/Park& 38th StChicago& 42nd StChicago& 46th StChicago& 48th StChicago& 52nd StChicago& 56th StPortland& 60th St Portland& 66th St Portland& 70th St Portland& 73rd St Portland& 77th St American& Chicago American & Bloomington American& Thunderbird Snelling & HighlandSnelling &County Road BSnelling &Hoyt-NebraskaSnelling &LarpenteurSnelling& ComoSnelling& HewittSnelling &MinnehahaSnelling& Dayton Snelling& GrandSnelling& St ClairSnelling &RandolphFord &FairviewFord &KennethFord &Woodlawn46th St &46th Ave 46th St &Minnehaha Ford &Finn RosedaleTransit CenterSnelling46th StFridleyCoon Rapids/Riverdale AnokaLAKE MINNETONKALAKE MINNETONKA WHITE BEARLAKEMEDICINELAKEWESTWOODLAKEBALD EAGLELAKEINDEPENDENCELAKELONGLAKE MINNEWASHTA LAKE LAKEHARRIETBDE MAKA SKA BUSH LAKE BASSLAKE GERVAISLAKE ANDERSON LAKE DEAN LAKE TWINLAKE RONDEAU PHALENLAKECEDARLAKEEAGLE/PIKELAKE LAKENOKOMIS HYLAND LAKE LAKECOMOCRYSTALLAKELAKEJOSEPHINE PIKE LAKE MOORELAKE MYSTIC LAKE ANDERSON LAKE TANNERSLAKELAKE OF THE ISLES PENN LAKE HIAWATHALAKEDIAMONDLAKE SMETANA LAKE NORMANDALE/ NORDMYR LAKE EDINA LAKE CORNELIA LAKE WAKEFIELDGRAY'SBAY WAYZATABAY BROWNSBAY CATE'S OR HIDDEN LAKE ROUND LAKE CENTENNIAL LAKES M IS S I S S IP PI RIVER MINNESOTA RIVER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MISSISSIPPI RIVER CROW RIVERMISSISSIPPI RIVER MINNESOTA RIVER HugoBlaine Eagan GrantOronoCorcoranPlymouthMedinaRogersDaytonWoodburyLino Lakes Shakopee Eden Prairie Edina Maple Grove Cottage Grove Lake Elmo Savage Brooklyn Park Prior Lake Chanhassen Chaska Roseville Victoria Apple Valley OakdaleNorthSt Paul LandfallShoreviewAnoka Louisville Twp Champlin Richfield Golden Valley North OaksMoundShorewood Carver White BearLakeWayzata Mahtomedi Jackson Twp Hopkins Newport South St Paul Deephaven DellwoodHanoverCentervilleOsseoMinneapolis Bloomington Burnsville Minnetonka Coon Rapids Fridley Maplewood Inver Grove Heights Arden HillsCrystalSt Louis Park Mendota Heights New BrightonBrooklyn Center Vadnais HeightsNew Hope West St Paul Little CanadaMounds View St Paul Park Robbinsdale Columbia HeightsHilltopTonka Bay Circle PinesFalcon HeightsSt Anthony LilydaleWoodland Gem LakeExcelsiorMaple PlainLong LakeGreenwoodMinnetonka Beach Pine SpringsSpring Park LauderdaleLoretto MendotaBlaineMedicine Lake Rosemount Lakeville ELM CREEK PARKELM CREEK PARKCROW HASSAN PARK RESERVE CARVER PARK RESERVE U OF M ARBORETUM MORRIS T BAKER PARK RESERVE HYLAND LAKE PARK RESERVE FORT SNELLING STATE PARK MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF LAKE ELMO REGIONAL PARK RESERVE MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF MURPHY-HANREHAN PARK RESERVE US FISH & WILDLIFE PRESERVE BRAEMAR PARK COMO PARK MN VALLEY RECREATIONAL AREA BATTLE CREEK-INDIAN MOUNDS PARK CLEARY LAKE PARK SNAIL LAKE REGIONAL PARK WILD WINGS GAME PRESERVE SPRING LAKE PARK BUNKER HILLS REGIONAL PARK COTTAGE GROVE RAVINE REGIONAL PARK MINNEHAHA PARKBRYANT LAKE PARK RICE CREEK NORTH REGIONAL TRAIL COR BALD EAGLE-OTTER TAIL REGIONAL PARKCLIFTON E FRENCH REGIONAL PARK MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF BREDESEN PARK EDENVALE PARK LAKE MINNEWASHTA FREGIONAL PARK LOCKE PARK FORT SNELLING STATE PARK CROSBY FARMREGIONAL PARK ALIMAGNET PARK LONE LAKE PARK TERRACE OAKS WEST PARK MILLER PARK PURGATORY PARK HAMLET PARK TURTLE LAKE CO PARKTHEODORE WIRTH PARK PIONEER PARKCENTRAL PARKEDENBROOK CONSERVATION AREA NEILL PARK LOCHNESS PARKHIGHLAND PARKBIG ISLAND PARK HIGHLAND PARK LAKEWOOD HILLS PARKHENNEPIN CO PARK PRESERVE KINGSTON PARK VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK PARK MN VALLEY NATL WILDLIFE REF NORTHVIEW PARK BOUNDARY CREEK PARK WOODRIDGE PARK MARSH LAKE PARK ANDREWS PARK EAST CREEK CANYON PARK CENTRAL PARK OXBOW CREEK PARK SCHWARZ POND PARK CARROLLS WOODS PARK PLYMOUTH CREEK PARKHERITAGEPARK BALDWIN PARKRUSTIC HILLS PARK RIDGECLIFFE PARK AFTONHEIGHTS PARKVALLEY PARK GEORGE OHMANN PARK PINE GLEN PARK PALMER LAKE PARK HEARTHSIDE PARK HIGHWOODS PARK LAKE OWASSO CO PARKCANTERBURY PARK LEBANON HILLS REGIONAL PARK NOERENBERG MEMORIAL PARK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REF INT CENTER 4th AveValley In d u s t r i a l B l v d N Valley In d u s t r i a l B l v d S Co Rd 101 17th Ave17th Ave St Francis Ave Round Lake BlvdCrooked Lake BlvdCahillCahill AveCollege Trail 89th Hiawatha Ave Eagle C r e e k Egan Dr 134th 12th ChippendaleBurmaBumleySt Paul Ave Ford PkwyVandalia 101st Ave Egret 95th Ave WescottMitchell RdPreserve BlvdCanterbury RdCanterbury RdMystic Lake DrDiffleyBudd AveConcordPlato Blvd BayfieldWabasha StJacksonRobert St Robert StSt Peter MNCedar28th AvePeony LnConwayDowling MapleShadywood Shakopee Ave PennockAuto Club B r o d e r i c kCartway RdBusiness Park BlvdParkParkPortlandWinifred2 1/2University 4th St 5th StWashingtonHennepin Highwood Golden TriangleIdaho NiagaraValley ParkRobert TrailOpperman Greenbrier RdXenium LnBonnevista DrWeaver Lake Rd 85th Ave Galaxie Galaxie4th St 5th St 3rd3rdSmith 22nd Ave20th Ave42nd56th St 4th St62nd Pl77th Ave 65th 65th36th St 31st 37th Ave 140th 127th 140th 145th St 154th St 94th St 86th 28th St26th 25th St 32nd Park View 2nd 60th St 60th St GarrettJamaica119th Ave 124th North Rd Cahill Rd4th Ave 140th140th 89thMainMainGreenHavenHarrison Main StMain St 6th St7th St12th St11th St10thKellogg Blvd93rd 125th Jacob89th AveZachary 86th St86th St 117th Ave 97th Ave26th Ave 84th St 143rd 141st 93rd AveMaple Grove PkwyBrooklyn BlvdLakeland 77th St 14 0 t h 80th4th Ave20th12th Ave4th Ave3rd Ave2nd1st Cedar AveCedar AveCedar AveCedar AveCeda r A ve MarschallWestonMarschall RdIndependence AveSarazinMarschall RdHodgson35th St 34th St Troy LnNobleShoreline DrShoreline Dr DaleDaleDaleOaklandSmithRobertStrykerBerry InwoodWhite Bear AveWhite Bear AveWhite Bear AveDivisionTechnology Dr Rockford Rd Diamond PathBrownWest River Rd Old Shakopee Stillwater Blvd 138th 136th Nicollet Blvd EvergreenXerxesBarrieYork XerxesXerxesXerxesNew Brighton BlvdCrestCo Rd 18N Shore Dr ClevelandCo Rd 3 8 ThompsonSouthview Blvd GrandArmour Hardman ConcordThompsonMarie3rd StButler Mendota Rd 24th AveHumboldt Valley View Rd Upper AftonOak AdamsOsseo Rd 44th Ave McAndrewsSpencerFullerFullerAtwoodHolmes Kenzie TerraceNorth StCo Rd 29H a d l e y Grant 40th Ave 40th Co Rd 42 Co Rd 42 140th C o R d 4 2 Southcro s s 160th StPennPenn OliverUpton Penn Ea g l e C r e e k B l v d Rice StRice 150th St 157th 155th 150th 153th Whitney 147th 147th St 147th St 142nd St 145th 1st Ave 125th 85th Ave UniversityUniversity AveEagl e C r e e k B l v dCo Rd 19Lake StLakeTownline Rd Hayden Lake Rd Northdale BlvdNorthdale St Co m o AveRaymondRound Lake BlvdNorthland Dr32nd AveShelard Pk w y Ford R d ChestnutJonathan Carver PkwyIronwood Vierling Dr Arboretum Blvd Prairi e C enter Dr Anderson Lake s P kwy Herrgott Memorial DrBass Lake Rd BloomingtonAir p o r t OhioLivingstonChesterLafayetteFillmore Mounds BlvdBellowsAllen Robert5th Ave5th AveCarmenWentworth Carmel Livingston M a rie Babcock Tr 55th Upper 55th Alta54th MarieDelaware Ames CrossingDodd RdGeorgeCharlton Orme Oakdale 65th S t 67th St 70th St 75th St 78th St 80th St80th St ClaytonDawnConcord BlvdConcordDawn WayConcord Exchange Dodd RdLexington21st Glen 15th 7th AveHastingsPullman LincolnHinton85th W P o i n t D o u g l a sIvystoneLower Afton Bielenberg DrSilver Bell Duckwood LexingtonDenmarkElrene Dodd RdYankee Doodle Town Centre DrLexingtonPromenade BraddockLone Oak GeminiEagandale Corporat e Cen ter Pilot KnobPilot KnobCentral PkwyCoachmanLetendre Quarry Yankee Doodle DonaldB lue Cross Rd Cliff Pilot Knob RdFlagstaffGalaxieBlackhawkNicolsRahnDodd RdBlue G e nti a n Dodd RdLondin Ln QueensPilot Knob RdBlaineMendota H e i g h ts In dian 123rdLincoln BrenBrenYellowCircleRed Circle 39th StBlake TylerVan Buren AveR ic h field 5thMainstreet5th Minnetonka Mills RdShady OakK-Tel 11th AveOpportunityWashingtonSmetana Dr11th12th AveGreenOakShady Oak Co Rd 3Co Rd 3 34th AveCo Rd 3HutchinsPorterScenic HeightsBakerVine HillOld MarketCo Rd 19Co Rd 19 Excelsior Minnetonka Blvd Antrim FranloBuckingh a m LindenSibley Memorial Hwy River Hills Cliff 122nd Parkwood NicolletCo Rd 5Co Rd 5Burnsville PkwyRed Cherry Lane V a lley V iew Delton Shady Oa k StillwaterBroadway St 8th AveSilver Lake RdSilver Lake RdSilver Lake RdSilver Lake Rd7th St 1st Ave8th St Old Hwy 8Old Hwy 8FossChandlerKasota Gortner EustisLarpenteur Larpenteur LarpenteurLarpenteurLarpenteurHennepin GuiderValley Creek RdTamarackFranklin Ave33rd Ave 29th37th Ave 37th PlCo Rd DTerminal RdLong LakeLong LakeArdan NaplesFlowerfieldLovell LexingtonLexingtonElmSunset AveUniversityTerritorialTransitway UniversityUniversity Thomas MarionJohn Ireland BlvdSelby SelbyMinnehaha AveHamlineHamlinePascalPascalPascalLincoln DrHamlineFront Como 3rd St WilsonHudsonSuburban McKnight RdMcKnight RdHazelFerndaleHadleyHadleyIdeal AveRuth StRuthHowardHudson Rd 7th St10th St12th StGentryHudsonCenturyCenturyCenturyCenturyWesternRiceRiceRiceJacksonL’OrientSycamore BrainerdIona LnTwin Lakes Pkwy CommerceWoodhill DrLydia Arbogast Owasso Blvd NHarrietKent Roselawn RoselawnDesotoBufordCarterClevelandMidway PkwyHoytSpring Minnehaha Minnehaha Stillwater RdStillwater BlvdE 7th St NokomisEnglishLarpenteur Hwy 120MargaretHolloway Benet GenevaBeebe7th Ave11th Ave 12th AveMcKnight RdBellaireLydiaArcadeArkwrightAtlanticCaseCayugaMarylandMaryland MarylandArlingtonArlingtonMcMenemyE 7th St3rd StBurrSkillman HazelwoodSouthlawnBeamCo Rd CCo Rd B Co Rd B2Co Rd B2 Co Rd CCo Rd C2 Co Rd DCo Rd E Co Rd E Co Rd ECo Rd F Co Rd FCo Rd 96Co Rd C Co Rd BEdgertonEdgerton StEdgertonPayneCentervilleLabore RoseStillwater Ave EdgewaterIvy 15th StGreenwayProsperityWhite Bear AveCounty LineStewart AveMahtomediWildwoodHwy 120WarnerVictoriaPacific EarlBurns Upper Afton 47th St Little Canada Rd Demont AveMarket Pl DrVictoriaVictoriaTanglewoodVictoriaHodgsonEnergy Park D r95thDunkirk9th LnOld Rockford RdNorth Shore DrBayside Rd MadisonMonroe5th AveRiverdale DrRiver RapidsCoon Rapids BlvdEast River Rd Coon Rapids BlvdHanson BlvdEgret123rdRobinson 113th 121st AveWest River Rd 109th Ave NathanBoundary Creek ZacharyRevereCentral93rd AveCo Rd 30Co Rd 81Elm CreekWest Fish Lake RdLawndale LnVicksburgHemlock LnMain StHemlock FoleySpringbrook85th 85th AveNorthdaleTerritorial RdFoleyPolkNorthdale105th Ave89th Ave 85th87thMonroeJeffersonEast River Rd Central AveSpring LakeUniversity AveMain StCo Rd HCo Rd H2 Co Rd JCo Rd 10 CentralLake Stinson BlvdOak St27th Ave15th Ave Stinson BlvdMcKinley18th Ave 39th RiversideWashington10th8th St SE BroadwayW BroadwayPlymouthOlsonEmersonLyndaleWashingtonFremontFremont XerxesFrance 1st Ave Johnson1st St2nd St26th33rd51st AveBrooklyn Blvd 53rd Ave57th AveBass Lake Rd 65th 69th AveBryantShingle Creek DrDupontDupontLoganPenn49th AveXerxesXerxes HumboldtXerxes 63rd Ave63rd AveBrooklyn Blvd79th77th Ave 93rd AveXylonWyoming ZaneZaneZaneHampshireDouglasBroadway80th Ave Brookdale DrWoodbineWelcomeNobleHalifax France71st Ave73rd Ave73rd Ave 73rd Ave69th Ave74th Ave 109th AveJefferson ElmRollinsComo Como AveWashington7th St 2nd St7thMonroeWashington NELowry26th St16th St Park PlBarry Lowry LowryCedar Lake RdWisconsinMendelssohnHillsboroLouisiana GlenwoodLagoon CentralCentralReservoirArthur44th AveFrontage Rd53rd Ave Osborne81st AveOakdale 27th Ave29th31stExcelsior BlvdCo Rd 25 W BroadwayW BroadwayNobleLake France42nd Ave Douglas DrDouglas DrWest BroadwayHampshire 65th 67th Ave71st AveWinnetkaWinnetkaWinnetkaLouisiana GrandColumbiaSt AnthonyKnoxMedicine Lake Rd Duluth StOlympia36th Ave36th Ave 36th Ave 8th NBrookdale Dr85th Ave83rd Ave Shingle Creek Pkwy University AveUniversity AveUniversity AveGardenaWayzata BlvdWayzata BlvdBarryOakland Ridgedale Carlson Pkwy West River Rd95th RussellHedberg DrHopkins CrossroadCo Rd 73Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka BlvdExcelsior BlvdCo Rd 146Co Rd 51 Co Rd 15Shoreline Dr 66th AveGolden Valley Rd Orchard TrentonBass Lake Rd BooneBooneNathan Nathan LnZacharyKilmer LnPineview Ln 54th Ave46th45th36th AveSchmidt Lake Rd Lancaster Medicine Lake Blvd Plymouth A v eFernbrookVicksburgCarlsonDunkirkDunkirkRanchview Northwest BlvdCo Rd 6 34thMedinaCo Rd 9Northwest BlvdQuinwoodCo Rd 101Co Rd 6CentralFernbrook Ln37th36thHarbor 117th AveCo Rd 19 Minnetonka Blvd 10th Ave63rd Ave59th Ave Betty Crocker DrSchmidt Lk Rd Xeon StCoon Rapids Blvd Minnehaha Ave 42nd Ave54th St56th St 42nd AveGrandGrandNicollet Nicollet NicolletGarfieldNicollet46th46th 28th Ave 34th Ave 54th StSunrise DrHwy 12142nd St 42nd St 23rd Ave28th Ave58th St36th AveFranklin Franklin16th StDouglasLyndaleLyndale ChicagoChicagoCedarCedar27th Ave26thMinnehaha Ave24th St29th Bloomington4th Ave3rd AveStevens Blaisdell 50th St 44th47th48th 54th66th St 66th St66th St 69th St 38th 38th39th36th35th 38th StBryant BryantHennepinSt ClairFairview FairviewPriorFairviewDavernSnellingSnellingSnellingSnellingClevelandW 7th StGannonSheridanCleveland MontrealNorfolkRandolph RandolphJeffersonSt Paul Ave W 7th StMarshallCretinCretinGrand GrandLexingtonLexingtonLexingtonLexington PennKnoxKnoxPenn70th St Hazelton 70th St American Blvd 90thChowenAbbott47th 48th DrewFranceFranceFrance American Blvd PortlandPortlandValley View 82nd St82nd 81st St 82nd Portland12th Ave12th AveBloomington77th St 76th St 76th St 76th 84th Edinborough WayLyndaleLyndaleLyndaleParklawn Ave Gallagher Dr Minnesota Dr France Johnson FranceFrance Lindau Old Cedar30th99th St 78th 82nd 84th 104th St 106th St Metro 74th St Old Shakopee Dewey Hill Rd E Bush LkPennJamesPoplar Bridge 94th NesbittNormandale BlvdNorman Center Dr98th St 98th St 98th St 98th St 102nd St 108th StBloomington Ferry Bush Lake Killebrew Normandale LK BlvdCo Rd 28StanleyBloomington Ferry Eden50th 44th W Bush LkDiamondLake Rd Cesar Chavez(Concord) W hite Bear AveWestminsterWestminsterT ra v e le rs T rlCandlewood Dr Shingle Cre e k Pk wyW BroadwayJolly LnRidgedale DrWater Great Plains Blvd Market BlvdValley View Rd 10th Ave 11th Ave Smetana Rd Lone Oak PkwyJohnny Cake Ridge Rd Cedar Lake Rd Minnetonka Blvd 36th StCambridge St 36th St MontereyQuentinLake St Lake LakeExcelsior Blvd 37thFairfield Beltline BlvdSheridanHennepinSheridanTransit w a y C edar G rove Pkw y S o u t h v i e wLaurel Old Shak o p e e Bass Lake RdVernonWest River Rd Oak G r o v e P k w yWayzata Blvd Garden View DrCo Rd 11Embr y Pat hLad PkwyWayzata Blvd 45th113th AveMississippi Blvd111th Hewitt S Park Dr QuebecPennsylvania Co Rd 101 S hen andoah DrCo Rd 14 Stagecoach RdC rossings BlvdCo Rd 21Cedar La ke A ve69th 62ndOptum Cedar Lake Rd 50th StN e il Arm strongGolden V alle y Rd Vernon Lynn QuentinV ikin gs PkwyWallaceFlying Cloud Dr Valley Creek Rd Colleg e v i ewCargo M c A n d rewsAldrichBurnhaven BurnhavenCrystal Lake Dr GreenhavenCainTerritorial RdTrail HavenLarkinHarffBechtoldStrehlerRogersHorseshoe93rdHassan PkwyStiegTown HallOakdaleQueenKalkMohawkRolling HillsWood LnChippewaMeisterOld SettlersTomahawkRebecca ParkWillandale RdJubertTessmerTrailCo Rd 10Main StValley DrHomestead109th AveCo Rd 50ChippewaSalemWillowPioneer141st Brockton LnBrockton LnCo Rd 116WoodlandCo Rd 19Park DrIndustrialFletcher LnSylvan Lake RdRosedaleTucker RdArrowheadCo Rd 116Co Rd 30Co Rd 50Co Rd 10Pioneer129th NTucker RdCainBrocktonOakdale97thWoodland Trail Pioneer Trail Pioneer TrailHackamore Co Rd 101117th Ave125th AveS Diamond Lake RdZanzibar LnLawndale Ln105th NFrench Lake121st AvePineview LnValley Forge LnFrench Lake RdVinewood Ln133rd AveDayton Rd124th AveDunkirkN Diamond Lake RdTerritorial Rd HollyFernbrook Ln129th AveElm Creek Rd142nd AveFrench LakeTerritorialElmTroy54thCo Rd 47Bass Lake RdWillowIndependenceHunterBeckerHoly NameSpring HillWillow12thHamelWayzataParkviewCo Rd 19Co Rd 24PerkinsvilleHomestead Trail Medina HunterTamarack6th N6th NCo Rd 24FerndaleWatertownNorth ArmOld Crystal BayMcculleyMainWatertownCo Rd 6Co Rd 6TonkawaFoxHalgrenCo Rd 1106th N Town LineWest BranchMolineNorth Arm EdgewoodCo Rd 44Birch BluffSmithtown Gleason LakeCo Rd 101LakeMcGinty McGintyBreezy PtVicksburgCedar Lake RdLakeLakeWillistonShady Oak RdBaker Galpin BlvdArboretum BlvdBaker Audubon RdHazeltine Blvd192nd Ave82nd St82nd St Lyman Blvd Lyman Blvd Church Lake Blvd Victoria DrMill Bavaria RdMcKnight RdHazeltine BlvdRolling Acres RdMinnewashta PkwyCo Rd 62 Co Rd 4 Lake Lucy Rd Co Rd 101Vine HillEden Prairie Powers BlvdDell RdDuck Lake Trail 78th St Bren C h e s t n u t B v d Engler Mars h L a k e R d Pione e r T r a i l Bl u f f C r e e k D r Pioneer Trail Pioneer Tra i l Flying Clo u d D rEden Prairie RdShady OakPione er Tr ail Co Rd 140 Chaska BlvdDell RdHighway 13Eag l e C r e e k A v e Mccoll Chaska Blvd Akers 175th Xanadu180th 182nd 180th180thHarlow Ave5th Ave 145th StJohnson Memorial DrPuebloFairlawn154th 165th RevereNatchezMarschall RdMarystown RdMarystown RdDakotaTownline AveTownline AveBaseline AveMurphy LakeOld Brick Yard RdE a g l e C r e e kKoeper AveZumbro AveZumbro Ave173rd AllenCleary Lake 150th St 170th St Co Rd 2 8 2 Country TrailLangford Blv d Co Rd 72 Co Rd 78 Co Rd 42 160th 130th StAudubon RdVierling Dr Howard Lake RdDa k o t ah PkwyHighlandWoodlandTonkawoodWillistonCovingtonPowers BlvdCo Rd 30101st NLawndale LnCo Rd 19109thHanson BlvdXanthus LnXylite99th Ave7th Ave101st Lake DrNaples St105th Ave Bunker LakeRadisson38th Ave St Francis Blvd 131st AveBunker Lake Blvd Coon Creek FoleyCo Rd 52Bunker Lake Blvd RadissonNorthdale Blvd Lake Dr20thBirch Otter Lake RdJamaicaVadnais Blvd MainMainCenterville12th AveHolly Birch Ash Elmcrest Dellwood RdDellwood Ave Quail80thHickory75th KeatsTurtle Lake 2nd AveCo Rd H2Co Rd FCo Rd 96 Lk Blvd N Goose Lake Rd 9th StOtter ViewBald Eagle AveEagleOtter LakeHwy 96Centerville Rd CentervilleLake DrEa s t O a ks Pleasant Lake Pleasant Lake East Oaks Birch White Bear Pkw y Co Rd J South Shore Blvd FrenchmanCedar 47th NLexington40th StArcade St50th St 50th St M i l i t a r y Glen Oakridge RadioBailey Mil i t a r y 65th InwoodWoodburyValley Creek HintonKeatsBailey Dale WoodlaneRadio DrRadio DrWoodlane70th Old HudsonHudson RdWoodburyIdeal10th St15th StSkyway CenturyCarver AveLinwood Pouliot Upper Afton Warner BabcockRed Rock RdAmana Lake Rd 96th 80th St KeatsSterling StConcord BlvdBroadway 9th Portland80th Lone Oak 70th St Jamaica MargaretParkway ArlingtonJohnson PkwyWheelock Pkwy Pilot Knob RdShannonShannon PkwyChippendaleConnemaraConnemaraDodd Rober t T ra i l 142nd 160th St Diamond PathShepard RdDodd BlvdDodd Blvd170th CliffSibley Memorial Hwy Argenta Shepard RdSibley Memorial Hwy Cliff 165th 12th130th 172nd 185th 122nd 126th 162nd McAndrews Cliff Isleton 160th 157th Diffley Pilot KnobCo Rd 11Johnny Cake Ridge HayesCo Rd 11Mckenna RdRiverview 90th New Brighton BlvdPioneer Trail Homeward HillsValley V i e w ClevelandRoselawnCo Rd BCo Rd CWest River Pkwy M i n n e h a ha Pk w y N okomis Pkwy 86th W B u s h Lake E Bush Lake Highwood St Anthony Blvd Flying Cloud Dr Bottineau Blvd Bottineau Blvd Transfer RdWestern AveRoselawn VictoriaWest Broadway Northwest BlvdSummitInterlachen BlvdBlakeOlinger 78th St 78th Ave99th Ave NWeaver Lake85thElm Creek Blvd/77th AvePlymouth MedinaCarlson Pkwy 101st AveWinnetkaDouglas109th Ave Noble PkwyRegent61st 73rd AveMississippi St49th Ave Fairway Co Rd E Lake Joh a n n a B l v d FairviewSnail Lake BlvdHamline AveCo Rd DLexington Owasso Blvd WCo Rd I HodgsonFoley BlvdOliveMarshall FrontComoEnergy P a rk DrSummit46th AveMarshall6th St7th St8th St 28th St LyndalePortland50th St Eden Prairie RdMarshall East River Rd East River Rd EgretCo Rd 116 Bunker Lake Blvd Pleasant 7th AveGramsie FrostCo Rd B North St PaulEdgertonBoydHarknessStillwater RdPedersen WeirHelenMcKnight Rd17th AveBeam H a s t i n g s Hadley E P o i n t D o u g l a s Yankee D o o d le 3rd St4th St 5th3rd AvePortland Ave5th Ave4th Ave2nd AveMarquetteParkChicagoNicollet MallHennepin 1st Ave2nd Ave3rd Ave12th St L a k e s h o r e Highland Pkwy BeardW Medicine Lake Xenium LnCampusHumboldtCheshire54th AveAnnapolis52nd Ave LongfellowEast River Rd EdgcumbeMinnesota Bl uffs DrFerryCity W Pkw yTexas AveQuincyThurstonMounds View Blvd L’Orient Eagan City Hall Oakwoods of Eagan Thomson Reuters Ecolab Signal HillsCenterHumboldtHighSchool Walmart Arbor Pointe Fort Snelling National Cemetery National Sports CenterAnoka Co Human Service CenterNorthtownMallMercy Hospital -Unity CampusFridley High School HighlandVillage Sibley PlazaVAMedicalCenter Valley West Shopping Center Minneapolis - St Paul International Anoka Co/Blaine AirportCrystalAirport St Paul DowntownAirport South St Paul Airport Flying Cloud Airport WellsFargo CentennialSr HighSchool ShoreviewCommunityCenterMedtronicCrystalCenter Maplewood Mall CenturyCollegeWestM HealthFairviewSt John'sHospital TamarackVillage3MHqHardingHigh SchoolWashington TechMagnet School JohnsonHigh School Ramsey CoCorrectionalFacilityWoodwindsHealth Campus Eden Prairie Center Century CollegeEastSuper TargetLandO’ Lakes Deluxe DeluxeCorpHqMedtronicCub FoodsHamline UniversityMacalesterCollegeCretin-Derham HallHigh SchoolHighland ParkHigh School Concordia University CentralHigh SchoolMontrealHi-Rise UnitedHospitalAllianz FieldAnokaTechnicalCollegeMercyHospitalUniversity ofSt ThomasSt CatherineUniversityMinnesotaVeteransHomeRasmussen College Hennepin Technical College Valleyfair Target Safe Haven for Youth Mystic Lake Casino Burnsville Center M Health Fairview Apple Valley Square Minnesota Zoo St Francis Regional Medical Center Court House Cub Foods Canterbury Park Lowes Workforce Center Amazon Southbridge Crossing Middle School Junior High School Community Center Shakopee High School Town Square Mall Normandale Community College Preserve Village Mall Jefferson High School Normandale Village Inver Hills Community College Simley High School DunwoodyCollegeAnoka RamseyCommunityCollegeNorth Hennepin Community CollegeWalmartMapleGroveTransitStationFountains atArbor LakesPrudential Hennepin Technical College MplsInstituteof Arts South High SchoolAbbott Northwestern Children’sWashburnHigh School RooseveltHigh SchoolPark NicolletMedical Center SWHigh SchoolM HealthFairviewSouthdaleHospital Southdale Center Southtown Center Best Buy HQ Edinborough Park Richfield High School CedarPointCommons Cub Foods Cub Foods Kennedy High School MethodistHospitalShoppes atKnollwoodGeneralMills Honeywell Cedar TrailsCondominiumsRegency HospitalNorth MemorialHealth HospitalRidgedaleCenterCarlsonCenterMinnetonkaHeights AptsSuperTargetCubFoodsMinnetonkaLibraryMinnetonkaCity Hall U of MSt PaulCampusHealthPartnersHuntingtonBank StadiumAugsburgUniversityM HealthFairview M HealthFairview State FairGroundsRosedaleMall HarMarMall SuperTarget Roseville High School Como ParkHigh SchoolRosevilleCity HallSilver LakeVillageTheQuarryEdisonHigh SchoolNorthCommunityHigh SchoolPatrick Henry High SchoolBrooklyn CenterHigh SchoolWinnetkaShoppingCenterNew HopeCity Hall YMCA HoneywellUPS Eagan High School OakdaleCity HallHillcrest Center NorthHigh SchoolRiverdaleCrossingAnoka-Metro Regional Treatment CenterTarget NorthCampus Universityof MinnesotaUniversityof MinnesotaTrailhead FedEx UPS Louisiana AveTransit CenterStarliteTransit Center RobbinsdaleTransit Center Columbia HeightsTransit CenterUptownTransit Station Chicago-LakeTransit Center Little CanadaTransit Center Maplewood MallTransit Center Sun RayTransit Center BurnsvilleTransitStation SouthdaleTransit Center SouthWestStation SouthWestVillage Marschall RdTransit StationCarverStation East CreekStation Station 73Park & Ride NorthtownTransit Center EaganTransit Center Mall of AmericaTransit Station Terminal 1TransitCenter DowntownSt PaulDowntownMinneapolis 294LONGLAKE LILYLAKEMCKUSICKLAKEMCDONALDCLOVERDALELAKE BayportStillwaterOak Park Heights BayportStillwaterOak Park Heights Mu lbe rr yWater StMainMarket4th StMy rt le 3rdParisOlive GreeleyPineCurveCrestCo Rd 5ChurchillOrleansOrleansStillwater BlvdManning NorthbrookNealMain80th StagecoachOsgoodMckusick 47 th 50 thOlinda40th St StonebridgeOwensBoutwellManning50th StStillwater DetailTo Ramsey, Elk River and Big Lake (see Northstar inset map)To Forest Lake and Columbus To Stillwater (see detail map) TRANSIT INFORMATION: metrotransit.org | 612-373-3333 This map is an overview of regional transit routes. Each route has a number and routes are grouped by when and how frequently they operate. Route numbers appear in signs above windshields and each route has its own printed schedule.Printed schedules include detailed maps and schedule information. They are available at Metro Transit service centers and select retail outlets. Call 612-373-3333 to have a schedule mailed to you. You may also view and print them at metrotransit.org.Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Transit System MapEffective: 12/3/22To Becker and St. Cloud Park & Rides1691019410101025887Northstar Link BusNorthstarBig LakeBig LakeRamseyRamseyElk RiverElk RiverAlbertvilleSt MichaelMonticelloRogersDaytonElk RiverOtsegoRamseyBigLakeCo Rd 43171st AveCROW HASSAN PARK RESERVEMiles012Northstar Commuter Rail000000000Frequent Local BusesServe all stops and operate at least every 30 min. during middays on weekdays, more often during rush hours. Evening and weekend service may be less frequent.All-Day Local BusesServe all stops and operate throughout the day but may offer less frequent service.All-Day Express BusesLimited-stop or non-stop service that operates throughout the day on weekdays but may offer less frequent service.Rush-Hour BusesService is primarily during rush hours.(M-F 6:00-9:00 am and 3:00-6:30 pm)Non-stop Service Buses do not stop to pick up or drop off customers on these route segments.Limited Service Only certain trips take this route segment.Northstar Commuter RailOperates rush-hour service on weekdays only. Trains stop at all stations shown.METRO Blue LineTrains stop at all stations shown.METRO Green LineTrains stop at all stations shown.METRO Orange LineBuses stop at stations on demand.METRO Red LineBuses stop at stations on demand.METRO A Line, C Line & D LineBuses stop at stations on demand.Point of InterestPark & Ride LotHospitalTransit Center/Station000 METRO TRANSIT ROUTES IN CAHILL ROUTE 540 ON METRO BOULEVARD Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 18 DISTRICT PROFILETRANSPORTATION ISSUES As future land uses are developed for the District, a multimodal transportation system that provides for three categories of movement should be designed: • Movement between the District and the region, • Movement between the District and adjacent neighborhoods, and • Movement within the District. Realizing this vision of a multi-modal system will open the District to new workers, customers and residents who use walk, bike, roll, or take transit to their destinations. To do so, the following issues in the existing network in and around the Cahill District must be addressed. ROADWAY CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES The daily traffic volumes are reasonable given the District’s predominance of employment uses. An assessment of traffic volumes against the available existing street geometry and configuration of travel lanes showed that the streets can accommodate existing and forecasted travel demand. There are two exceptions, however, where travel demand will surpass the lane capacity of affected streets. It is forecasted that capacity deficiencies will occur along 70th Street, between Cahill Road and Metro Boulevard, and Industrial Boulevard/ Bush Lake Road between the city limits and TH 100. SAFETY AND CRASHES The unusual geometry of the intersection of Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (the so-called “triangleabout”) is frequently a cause of accidents and driver confusion. It does not accommodate pedestrians and cyclists and negatively impacts transit connectivity. High crash rates have been observed at: • West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard (0.4 crashes/year) • Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (0.6 crashes/year) • West 70th Street/Normandale Road/TH 100 (1.3 crashes/year) • Metro Boulevard/Edina Industrial Boulevard (1.4 crashes/year) Staff reports receiving a number of complaints about vehicles exceeding the posted speed limit on West 70th Street. The presence of on-street bike lanes on West 70th Street prevent the construction of conventional speed mitigation measures (curb extensions, chicanes, lane shifts, etc.) DRIVEWAY ACCESSIBILITY Industrial Boulevard between Metro Boulevard and TH 100 has a large number of access driveways and a high rate of reported crashes. PARKING ISSUES On-street parking is highly utilized on West 74th Street and Bush Lake Road adjacent to the Wooden Hill Brewing Company. The City receives frequent requests to expand on-street parking in the area and hears concerns about the impact of on-street parking on intersection/driveway sight lines and transit access. TRANSIT As the economy and social behavior recover from the pandemic, improved transit service (expanded coverage and increased frequencies) may be needed. Land use scenarios developed for consideration should be transit supportive and transit dependent. Bus stop locations should be improved to ensure a comfortable, safe, and secure environment for transit passengers. Of particular concern is the lack of facilities that connect to transit stops on Metro Boulevard, West 70th Street, Bush Lake Road, and Cahill Road. The district also lacks transit stop amenities. Shelters, benches, and even climate control should be considered. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES The West 78th Street Bridge over the railroad right-of-way is a significant gap in the pedestrian network and bicycle network. Multi- modal facilities are needed on the bridge as transit riders frequently complain about having to walk/bike in traffic across the bridge to access a convenient bus stop. Sidewalks are needed on both sides of the street that effectively link destinations within the District. The safest and most desirable bicycle facilities are separated from motor vehicle traffic. Opportunities will exist to develop separated, protected bike lanes in the District. MISSING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES ON THE 78TH STREET BRIDGE OVER THE RAILROAD ROW INTERSECTING TRAFFIC AT EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD AT METRO BOULEVARD Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 19 DISTRICT PROFILEECONOMIC CONDITIONS BUSINESS AND PROPERTY OWNER ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS Property owners and businesses operating in the Cahill District participated in surveys and focus groups to share their essential perspectives on activities, challenges, and opportunities in the industrial park. Businesses were grouped into one of two categories for the focus groups: firms with national/global markets and firms with local/regional markets. There was additional outreach to property owners who own multi-tenant properties. In both the survey and in focus groups, all participants indicated that they expect the Cahill District will continue to be a competitive location for their businesses over the next decade. While methods and estimates may vary, there are believed to be between 4,000 and 7,000 jobs located within the District. STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF THE CAHILL DISTRICT National/global and local/regional firms largely concur on the most prominent strengths of the Cahill District for their operations. Foremost, the District’s centralized location in the metro and accompanying freeway access are crucial to attract employees and customers commuting from across the region, and to help meet transportation needs, whereas heavy duty, all-weather roads are important for shipping and receiving year-round in the Midwest. Proximity to air service, frequent transit, and bicycle facilities are also identified as strengths. Elsewhere, the Cahill District provides an excellent quality of work life for employees. Participants indicated that the presence of childcare, restaurants, retail, and green spaces contribute to an enjoyable environment. One opportunity identified here is to leverage the freeway visibility of the district to enhance retail and dining options along Highway 100. Also, with the shift of workplace dynamics to allow employees to work from home and conduct meetings online, parking needs are changing. In response to this and other factors, the City recently reviewed and revised parking requirements for uses citywide. Reduced parking requirements may lead to redevelopment opportunities in the district on unneeded parking lot areas. The build-out of residential development near employment areas could strengthen retail and dining outlets. Participants in engagement activities also concurred that property owners and tenants in Cahill regularly make significant investments in maintenance, and interior and exterior improvements which benefit their businesses and their neighbors as well. One opportunity for deepened investment would be to leverage solar power in the District to meet carbon-neutrality goals; another might be to redesign water ponding areas and Nine Mile Creek with facilities for communal and recreational use. WEAKNESSES AND CHALLENGES OF THE DISTRICT Still, there are several challenging issues in the Cahill District that could be alleviated through future planning efforts. Participants responded that the stormwater management and flooding standards enforced by the Watershed District limit expansion of their facilities (issues concerning flooding, stormwater, and sewer systems are explored further on in this report). Additionally, many entities originally located to the District for its industrial zoning. Industries in the district are concerned about the further development of residential and retail properties adjacent to industrial sites within the district, whereas retail operations are already creating challenges for large employers. Included in these are on-street parking issues, where, currently, the potential legal, but unexpected overuse of on-street parking by retail customers is creating problems for industrial employees and deliveries. Noise complaints and pedestrian-freight vehicle collisions could become prevalent issues as well. Already, property owners have identified a need for safer and better connected sidewalks and crosswalks. Property owners and tenants have also expressed concern that the conversion of industrial sites toward more intense office employment with production areas (and possible residential developments) may increase parking demand, and demand for other amenities and public facilities in the area, which may be unfeasible. MinneapolisMinneapolis EDINAEDINA RichfieldRichfield BloomingtonBloomington Eden PrairieEden Prairie HopkinsHopkins St. Louis ParkSt. Louis Park MSP AirportMSP Airport Mall of AmericaMall of America CAHILL DISTRICTCAHILL DISTRICT Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 20 DISTRICT PROFILEUTILITIES SEWER CAPACITY In 2019, the City commissioned a sewer capacity study for locations in the City including the Cahill District. For the District, the baseline conditions (standard growth without redevelopment) and three redevelopment scenarios were evaluated for impacts on the sewer system capacity. The anticipated increased capacity needs ranged from 290,000 gallons per day (gpd) to 3,000,000 gpd depending on the scenario. Anticipated increases from each scenario were then contrasted against five system improvement options to determine capacities gained by each option, and associated cost estimates. Findings from the study indicated that regardless of land use changes within the Cahill District, enhanced sewer capacity would be required even if just to address anticipated increase in demand elsewhere in the sewer system. In that study, Scenario 4 was concluded best, next-least cost option to continuing with baseline conditions (Scenario 1). The City anticipates moving forward with Scenario 4. This Cahill District Plan considers that conclusion in presenting a preferred alternative for development. Utility improvements will be based on land use decisions made in this plan to set the final pipe sizes and needed improvements for 70+ year life-of-infrastructure needs. The tables to the right are excerpts from the study which detail Scenario 4 and the various engineering options available. The City of Edina’s document library hosts the complete sewer capacity study document. 22 Table 5-1 Redevelopment scenario results summary Within Study Area Pipe Downstream from Study Area: Pipe G-4094 Lift Station Summary Scenario Mean Flow (gpd) Increase from Existing (gpd) Increase from Existing (%) Mean Flow (gpd) Increase from Existing (gpd) Increase from Existing (%) LS-14: Sufficient Capacity?1 LS-06: Sufficient Capacity?2 Existing Conditions 547,941 -- -- 1,909,220 -- -- Yes Yes Scenario 1 – Baseline Condition 708,065 160,124 29% 2,189,722 280,502 15% Yes Yes Scenario 2 - More Intense Industrial/Commercial Development 838,019 290,078 53% 2,328,680 419,460 22% No Yes Scenario 3 (Updated) - Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Areas of Study Area 1,680,041 1,132,100 207% 3,247,295 1,338,075 70% No No Scenario 4 – Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Area and More Intense Industrial and Commercial 3,207,035 2,659,094 485% 4,892,633 2,983,413 156% No No 1 LS-14 current capacity: 1.2 MGD. The lift station was determined to have “sufficient capacity” if lift station capacity was greater than 150% of anticipated MCES peak flow for each redevelopment scenario (i.e., a factor of safety of 1.5). The value of 150% was used to estimate if the lift station could provide redundancy and sufficient capacity to convey redevelopment inflows during periods of maintenance or pump failure. The safety factor should be reevaluated during future phases of design. 2 LS-06 current capacity: 13.2 MGD. The lift station was determined to have “sufficient capacity” if lift station capacity was greater than 150% of anticipated MCES peak flow for each redevelopment scenario (i.e., a factor of safety of 1.5). The value of 150% was used to estimate if the lift station could provide redundancy and sufficient capacity to convey redevelopment inflows during periods of maintenance or pump failure. The safety factor should be reevaluated during future phases of design. 22 Table 5-1 Redevelopment scenario results summary Within Study Area Pipe Downstream from Study Area: Pipe G-4094 Lift Station Summary Scenario Mean Flow (gpd) Increase from Existing (gpd) Increase from Existing (%) Mean Flow (gpd) Increase from Existing (gpd) Increase from Existing (%) LS-14: Sufficient Capacity?1 LS-06: Sufficient Capacity?2 Existing Conditions 547,941 -- -- 1,909,220 -- -- Yes Yes Scenario 1 – Baseline Condition 708,065 160,124 29% 2,189,722 280,502 15% Yes Yes Scenario 2 - More Intense Industrial/Commercial Development 838,019 290,078 53% 2,328,680 419,460 22% No Yes Scenario 3 (Updated) - Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Areas of Study Area 1,680,041 1,132,100 207% 3,247,295 1,338,075 70% No No Scenario 4 – Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Area and More Intense Industrial and Commercial 3,207,035 2,659,094 485% 4,892,633 2,983,413 156% No No 1 LS-14 current capacity: 1.2 MGD. The lift station was determined to have “sufficient capacity” if lift station capacity was greater than 150% of anticipated MCES peak flow for each redevelopment scenario (i.e., a factor of safety of 1.5). The value of 150% was used to estimate if the lift station could provide redundancy and sufficient capacity to convey redevelopment inflows during periods of maintenance or pump failure. The safety factor should be reevaluated during future phases of design. 2 LS-06 current capacity: 13.2 MGD. The lift station was determined to have “sufficient capacity” if lift station capacity was greater than 150% of anticipated MCES peak flow for each redevelopment scenario (i.e., a factor of safety of 1.5). The value of 150% was used to estimate if the lift station could provide redundancy and sufficient capacity to convey redevelopment inflows during periods of maintenance or pump failure. The safety factor should be reevaluated during future phases of design. REDEVELOPMENT SCENARIO RESULTS SUMMARY (2019 SEWER CAPACITY STUDY) DESIGN OPTION COST PER UNIT OF FLOW CAPACITY PROVIDED (2019 SEWER CAPACITY STUDY) PLANNING-LEVEL OPTION OF COST SUMMARY (2019 SEWER CAPACITY STUDY) 66 Table 6-2 Design option cost per unit of flow capacity provided Design Option Planning-Level Opinion of Probable Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) Scenario 1 – Baseline Condition Scenario 2 - More Intense Industrial/Commercial Development Scenario 3 (Updated) - Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Areas of Study Area Scenario 4 – Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Area and More Intense Industrial and Commercial Option 1: upsize from study area to new Parklawn lift station Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $15,394,000 $15,636,000 $19,620,000 $26,336,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $5,957 $5,113 $3,200 $2,250 Option 2: diversion south to Bloomington Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $8,036,000 $8,253,000 $9,014,000 $10,649,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $3,110 $2,699 $1,470 $910 Option 3: diversion south to W77th and Parklawn lift station Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $15,019,000 $16,019,000 $21,139,000 $28,670,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $5,812 $5,238 $3,447 $2,449 Option 4: upsize from study area to MCES interceptor Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $6,618,000 $6,835,000 $9,476,000 $15,884,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $2,561 $2,235 $1,545 $1,357 Option 5: option 3 with connection to Bloomington Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $15,019,000 $16,091,000 $21,144,000 $28,728,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $5,812 $5,262 $3,448 $2,454 66 Table 6-2 Design option cost per unit of flow capacity provided Design Option Planning-Level Opinion of Probable Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) Scenario 1 – Baseline Condition Scenario 2 - More Intense Industrial/Commercial Development Scenario 3 (Updated) - Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Areas of Study Area Scenario 4 – Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Area and More Intense Industrial and Commercial Option 1: upsize from study area to new Parklawn lift station Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $15,394,000 $15,636,000 $19,620,000 $26,336,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $5,957 $5,113 $3,200 $2,250 Option 2: diversion south to Bloomington Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $8,036,000 $8,253,000 $9,014,000 $10,649,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $3,110 $2,699 $1,470 $910 Option 3: diversion south to W77th and Parklawn lift station Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $15,019,000 $16,019,000 $21,139,000 $28,670,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $5,812 $5,238 $3,447 $2,449 Option 4: upsize from study area to MCES interceptor Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $6,618,000 $6,835,000 $9,476,000 $15,884,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $2,561 $2,235 $1,545 $1,357 Option 5: option 3 with connection to Bloomington Total Study Area Inflow (SAC) 2,584 3,058 6,132 11,705 Total Design Option Cost $15,019,000 $16,091,000 $21,144,000 $28,728,000 Total Cost per SAC ($ / SAC) $5,812 $5,262 $3,448 $2,454 65 Table 6-1 Planning-level opinion of cost summary Design Option Planning-Level Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) Scenario 1 – Baseline Condition Scenario 2 - More Intense Industrial/Commercial Development Scenario 3 (Updated) - Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Areas of Study Area Scenario 4 – Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Area and More Intense Industrial and Commercial Option 1: upsize from study area to new Parklawn lift station Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $1,224,000 $1,224,000 $1,297,000 $1,453,000 Section 2 $12,253,000 $12,280,000 $15,469,000 $20,858,000 Total Cost $15,394,000 $15,636,000 $19,620,000 $26,336,000 Low Range (-50%) $7,696,500 $7,818,500 $9,810,000 $13,168,500 High Range (+100%) $30,786,000 $31,274,000 $39,240,000 $52,674,000 Option 2: diversion south to Bloomington Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $992,000 $992,000 $1,028,000 $1,440,000 Section 2 $115,000 $115,000 $119,000 $173,000 Parklawn LS Improvements1 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 Total Cost $8,036,000 $8,253,000 $9,014,000 $10,649,000 Low Range (-50%) $4,018,000 $4,126,500 $4,507,000 $5,325,000 High Range (+100%) $16,072,000 $16,506,000 $18,028,000 $21,300,000 Option 3: diversion south to W77th and Parklawn lift station Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $992,000 $992,000 $1,028,000 $1,440,000 Section 2 $7,098,000 $7,955,000 $12,244,000 $18,192,000 Parklawn LS Improvements1 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 Total Cost $15,019,000 $16,091,000 $21,139,000 $28,670,000 Low Range (-50%) $7,509,500 $8,045,000 $10,569,500 $14,335,000 High Range (+100%) $30,038,00 $32,182,000 $42,278,000 $57,340,000 Option 4: upsize from study area to MCES interceptor Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $1,175,000 $1,175,000 $1,245,000 $1,393,000 Section 2 $3,526,000 $3,526,000 $5,377,000 $10,463,000 Total Cost $6,618,000 $6,835,000 $9,476,000 $15,884,000 Low Range (-50%) $3,309,000 $3,418,000 $4,738,000 $5,973,500 High Range (+100%) $13,236,000 $13,672,000 $18,952,000 $23,894,000 Option 5: option 3 with connection to Bloomington Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $928,000 $928,000 $964,000 $1,376,000 Section 2 $115,000 $115,000 $119,000 $173,000 Section 3 $7,047,000 $7,903,000 $12,193,000 $18,142,000 Parklawn LS Improvements1 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 Total Cost $15,019,000 $16,091,000 $21,144,000 $28,728,000 Low Range (-50%) $7,510,000 $8,046,500 $10,573,000 $14,364,500 High Range (+100%) $30,040,000 $32,186,000 $42,292,000 $57,458,000 1 Design Options 1 and 2 offset the need for the Parklawn area lift station proposed in the York Avenue, Fairview, and Parklawn Sanitary Sewer Evaluation (Barr, 2019). For this reason, costs associated with proposed Parklawn area lift station are added to Options 2, 3, and 5 to allow for an even cost comparison between all design options. 65 Table 6-1 Planning-level opinion of cost summary Design Option Planning-Level Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) Scenario 1 – Baseline Condition Scenario 2 - More Intense Industrial/Commercial Development Scenario 3 (Updated) - Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Areas of Study Area Scenario 4 – Industrial to Residential Change in Edge Area and More Intense Industrial and Commercial Option 1: upsize from study area to new Parklawn lift station Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $1,224,000 $1,224,000 $1,297,000 $1,453,000 Section 2 $12,253,000 $12,280,000 $15,469,000 $20,858,000 Total Cost $15,394,000 $15,636,000 $19,620,000 $26,336,000 Low Range (-50%) $7,696,500 $7,818,500 $9,810,000 $13,168,500 High Range (+100%) $30,786,000 $31,274,000 $39,240,000 $52,674,000 Option 2: diversion south to Bloomington Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $992,000 $992,000 $1,028,000 $1,440,000 Section 2 $115,000 $115,000 $119,000 $173,000 Parklawn LS Improvements1 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 Total Cost $8,036,000 $8,253,000 $9,014,000 $10,649,000 Low Range (-50%) $4,018,000 $4,126,500 $4,507,000 $5,325,000 High Range (+100%) $16,072,000 $16,506,000 $18,028,000 $21,300,000 Option 3: diversion south to W77th and Parklawn lift station Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $992,000 $992,000 $1,028,000 $1,440,000 Section 2 $7,098,000 $7,955,000 $12,244,000 $18,192,000 Parklawn LS Improvements1 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 Total Cost $15,019,000 $16,091,000 $21,139,000 $28,670,000 Low Range (-50%) $7,509,500 $8,045,000 $10,569,500 $14,335,000 High Range (+100%) $30,038,00 $32,182,000 $42,278,000 $57,340,000 Option 4: upsize from study area to MCES interceptor Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $1,175,000 $1,175,000 $1,245,000 $1,393,000 Section 2 $3,526,000 $3,526,000 $5,377,000 $10,463,000 Total Cost $6,618,000 $6,835,000 $9,476,000 $15,884,000 Low Range (-50%) $3,309,000 $3,418,000 $4,738,000 $5,973,500 High Range (+100%) $13,236,000 $13,672,000 $18,952,000 $23,894,000 Option 5: option 3 with connection to Bloomington Study Area $1,917,000 $2,134,000 $2,855,000 $4,025,000 Section 1 $928,000 $928,000 $964,000 $1,376,000 Section 2 $115,000 $115,000 $119,000 $173,000 Section 3 $7,047,000 $7,903,000 $12,193,000 $18,142,000 Parklawn LS Improvements1 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 $5,012,000 Total Cost $15,019,000 $16,091,000 $21,144,000 $28,728,000 Low Range (-50%) $7,510,000 $8,046,500 $10,573,000 $14,364,500 High Range (+100%) $30,040,000 $32,186,000 $42,292,000 $57,458,000 1 Design Options 1 and 2 offset the need for the Parklawn area lift station proposed in the York Avenue, Fairview, and Parklawn Sanitary Sewer Evaluation (Barr, 2019). For this reason, costs associated with proposed Parklawn area lift station are added to Options 2, 3, and 5 to allow for an even cost comparison between all design options. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 21 DISTRICT PROFILESTORMWATER CAPACITY As a result of the significant presence of flood areas and flood zones in the District, there is very little capacity for underground parking or basement levels. Constructing flood-proof structures could require higher first floor elevations above grade. The City and property developers will need to partner with the Watershed District to find solutions for additional space for stormwater management in the district. Past and present conditions are shown in the schematics below. WETLANDS AND FLOODING The Cahill District is located on the site of a historic wetland. While most of that wetland has been displaced by impervious surface, the topography of the area and other natural factors, including the remaining Nine Mile Creek, continues to cause flooding concerns. There are significant 10-year (10%) flood areas and 100-year (1%) flood zones in the district. There should be considered at length during the next phases of planning in the district. FLOOD ZONES PAST AND PRESENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Past Condition Present Condition Flood storage Flood level Flood level Flood storage CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVESCONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVES Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 23 CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVESMANAGING CHANGE The process of change in the Cahill District is inevitable. Businesses will come and go, buildings will be improved or fall into disrepair, and the function of the district in the region will continue to shift as areas around it do as well. The value of a district plan in this context is to seek a purposeful, guided path forward - one that maximizes benefits to Edina and supports a resilient District. Supporting this change however requires multiple considerations. ROLE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR The City’s path forward is necessarily constrained. The City controls a fairly small amount of land in this large district, with few prospects for major acquisitions at present. Additionally, the district is already functioning reasonably well and yielding significant benefit to the city and property owners. This area therefore is not like Southdale or Centennial Lakes, where consolidated ownership and largely vacant lands made it possible to enact broad and sweeping changes. In the context of this, the City’s role is anticipated to include the following: • Updated policy and regulatory direction, providing guidelines and signaling intent in terms of the City’s vision for the district • Assessment demand for and capacity of public infrastructure and services, to ensure it is sufficient to meet needs • Investment in basic infrastructure, included needed upgrades to wastewater and other utilities to meet basic standards and provide additional capacity when directed by policy • Investment in the public realm consistent with approved plans and policies, prioritizing publicly owned right of way • Opportunity-driven coordination, collaboration, and/or partnership with other public and private entities seeking to make investments in the district, on a case-by-case basis • Other specific actions, as outlined in the Implementation section of this plan OPPORTUNITY COST OF REDEVELOPMENT As the current mix of uses in this area has considerable value to the City, any redevelopment scenario must consider the opportunity cost of replacing or significantly modifying existing uses. This is especially true for industrial uses, given than Edina has no other designated industrial district like Cahill. If an industrial area is eliminated in favor of another use, there is a question regarding whether the replacing use would provide more or less net benefit to the community. Industrial districts in developed communities often play a subtle but important support role for the function of other uses. Services provide back-office support for other Edina businesses. Office spaces provide professional services for Edina residents, from lawyers to chiropractors. And others – like batting cages and hockey rinks – simply can’t find spaces with the size, dimension, and price point anywhere else in Edina. While the City is not mandated to accommodate all uses there today, this reality suggests changes to the District should be made with care. CAPACITY OF PUBLIC SYSTEMS AND SERVICES As the history of the district demonstrates, capacity constraints are no accident. The selection of former wetlands has constrained development since day one, and the roadway network was designed as auto and truck oriented. At the same time, factors like climate change and variations in regional growth patterns have impacted these systems in ways that have furthered the constraints and raised questions about the need for improvement. It is expected that any redevelopment of the area will involve at least some intensification of uses. This may add to workers, residents, customers, visitors, and others in the area, potentially putting pressure on public services. In addition to added traffic and demand for utilities, this could equate to additional needs for public parks, schools, safety, and health services. While any one project cannot be held responsible for cumulative impacts citywide, public decision makers will need to take these impacts into account when making decisions about permitting development and allocating resources to public infrastructure and services. BALANCING CONNECTION AND SEPARATION The development of the Cahill district will need to strike a balance between connectivity and separation with the surrounding area. On the side of connectivity, there is significant opportunity to make meaningful pedestrian and bicycle connections through the district. This can provide safer and more intuitive ways to connect to both current and planned regional trail corridors, leveraging that resource for transportation and recreational purposes. Improved multimodal connections can be an important amenity for workers and residents to provide options within the district. On the side of separation, it will still be important to provide some separation between traffic and other users within the district. Routing trucks so they minimize potential conflicts with pedestrians and bicyclists will make travel safer and more comfortable for all modes. Additionally, buffering and separating incompatible uses can reduce conflicts and mitigate impacts such as light, noise, vibration, and activity outside during typical hours. BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY While sustainability in the District may take many meanings (environmental, economic, social, etc.), this plan utilizes an understanding of, “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Some sustainability implications are briefly noted below. For environmental sustainability, this can have implications for management and restoration of natural areas, reducing dependency on scarce natural resources such as through energy efficiency, and other offsets via green building and business practices. For economic sustainability, this can have implications for providing opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. It can also relate to strengthening and growing the City’s tax base as a way to pay for needed investments in public infrastructure and services and to maintain a more consistent level of services without significant impacts on residents. From the perspective of social sustainability, this can have implications for ensuring the district is keeping pace with the ever-evolving needs of a changing community. This can include places that provide social connections and economic sustainability for people. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 24 CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVESNEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NODENODE 70th & Cahill70th & Cahill BUSINESSBUSINESS NODENODE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL CORE NINE MILE CREEKCAHILL RDCAHILL RDLEWIS PARKLEWIS PARK EDINA IND. EDINA IND. BLVDBLVD W 70th STW 70th ST US POST US POST OFFICEOFFICE XCEL XCEL ENERGYENERGY Edina Public Edina Public WorksWorks HWY 100HWY 100Mixed C-W Mixed C-R Mixed R-W Communal (C) Recreational (R) Working (W) Mixed All Uses OPEN HOUSE #2 “DESIRED ACTIVITIES” RESULTS TWO NODES AND A CORE CONCEPT HIGH EMPLOYMENT The High Employment Office area offers modern, well connected office spaces that elevate the image of the Cahill District, and Edina’s role as a high-quality employment center in the Twin Cities. These intensive, medium- and large-scale office spaces provide an additional employment offering to the adjacent Industrial Core, with sectors oriented towards tech and innovation, complimentary to the existing entrepreneurial identity of the District. NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE The Neighborhood Mixed Use Activity Center area blends retail, office, light industrial, and multi-family housing within a cohesive subarea. The resulting mixed-use neighborhood is a place where residents can live, work, and play, offering both daytime employment and services, before turning to evening retail and dining spaces in which to gather and serve as a destination and amenity for surrounding neighborhoods. NEIGHBORHOOD NODE The Neighborhood Node area is the primary destination for locally-serving businesses that cater to the everyday needs of local Edina residents as well as multifamily residential. The Neighborhood Node is the place to meet neighbors for coffee in the morning, to grab lunch with coworkers, or take your kids to dance studio after work. INDUSTRIAL CORE The Industrial Core is comprised of the enterprising essence of the Cahill District, preserving and celebrating its identity as a district for both forward-thinking industry and essential support services for the city. Uses here reflect a similar composition of existing businesses — fabricators and manufacturing, community and businesses services, office spaces — and will continue to provide goods and services with local, regional, and global impacts. BUSINESS NODE The Business Node leverages its prime location at the Edina Industrial Blvd and Hwy 100 interchange to offer a key business-serving commercial destination, and supportive offices. The area will be hub for retail and services oriented to businesses and employees in both the Cahill and Pentagon Park districts. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Concept development of the District was a multi-step process, centered on an understanding that, at a scale of over 300 acres, the District can be several things at once. As such, development scenarios were organized around a series of subdistricts, each with their own arrangement and connections to surrounding areas. Anchoring these subdistricts was the concept of “two nodes and a core”, which originated initially from feedback at the second public open house. This information was further refined with additional input from the Work Group, developer roundtables, and land use best practices. The Neighborhood Node represents the 70th and Cahill area, and reflects the general policy guidance of the City’s 2019 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan. The other node encompasses retail uses along Edina Industrial Boulevard and Hwy 100, which serves employees and business of both the Cahill District and Pentagon Park. The Industrial Core represents the current mix of industrial and service uses existing today in the district. A critical direction identified through this plan was a desire to preserve the physical core and its allowed uses in the district today. The concept of two nodes and a core became the foundational constant for scenario development, and the organizing framework for understanding land uses within and around the District. Using this grounding framework, a subdistrict typology was established with potential and likely land uses that would be found in each scenario. Each subdistrict was developed towards a vision of preserving the core character of the District, while presenting new opportunities for it to grow and evolve. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 25 CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVESNeighborhood mixed use fronts the already residential 70th St, and also along Cahill Rd in attempt to “soften” the District’s edge. High employment office is located along Hwy 100. SCENARIO C NEIGHBORHOOD NODE BUSINESS NODE EMPLOYMENT, TAX BASE, ENTREPRENEURIAL CORE TWO NODES AND A CORE ADDITIONAL SUBDISTRICTS Neighborhood mixed use fronts the already residential 70th St, whereas high employment office is located along Hwy 100. Neighborhood mixed use fronts the already residential 70th St, and splits its placement along Hwy 100 with high employment office, balancing the two subdistricts and creating a need to amenitize the creek and east edge as redevelopment would occur. Neighborhood mixed use fronts the already residential 70th St and Hwy 100, creating a need to amenitize the creek and east edge as redevelopment would occur. SCENARIO B NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE HIGH DENSITY EMPLOYMENT SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT PROCESS These subdistricts were then combined with the foundational Two Nodes and a Core framework into a series of preliminary physical subdistrict zones, and the formation of four preliminary land use scenarios. Additional constants for each scenario were applied, each of which derived from Work Group guidance, and aligning with the District Plan’s guidance principles and goals. These additional constants included: • An east/west connection • Amenity laden east edge • More neighborhood friendly north and west edges • Greater density and intensity to the south and east edges No scenarios were developed that included no new housing, as feedback from the first two open houses and the Work Group identified a strong desire and need for additional housing options within the City. The most notable distinction across each scenario was the location and scale of the Neighborhood Mixed Use subdistrict, in relation to High Density Employment. This scale varies as the plan explored access needs, and potential impacts of a mixed use district containing residential uses. SCENARIO A SCENARIO D Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 26 CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVESA B C D E F G F SCENARIO A OPEN FOR BUSINESS The District is defined by industrial, service, and office uses, while introducing high employment offices along the east and south edges. This Cahill District is a high-employment center for innovation that brings together different types of employers into a single location. A B C D E F G F SCENARIO B OPEN TO MIXING The District is defined by a mix of employment and residential uses, anchored by industrial, service, and office while introducing significant new blended neighborhood to the east. This Cahill District is an employment center for innovation that brings together different types of employers and a sizable new mixed- use neighborhood along one edge of the district. B D E F G F A C SCENARIO C BLENDED EDGES The district maintains its interior industrial, service, and office uses, but introduces high employment offices along the east and south edge, while “softening” the west edge with blended living options. This Cahill District is an employment center for innovation, that offers high employment and living options blended along the edges of the district. SCENARIO D A B C D E1 E2 F G F HYBRID The District is defined primarily by industrial, service, and office uses, but also introduces a significant mixed-use live-work neighborhood along with east edge. This Cahill District is a destination for innovation employment, living, and gathering with coworkers or friends. NEIGHBORHOOD NODE BUSINESS NODE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL CORE HIGH EMPLOYMENT Each scenario was then refined to align with and reflect current parcel boundaries, existing land uses, existing roadway network, other boundaries, and the most appropriate location for the placement of land uses within each subdistrict. Additional scenario information and metrics can be found in Appendix D. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 27 CONFLICTS AND ALTERNATIVESSCENARIO SELECTION The final stage of engagement was focused on reaching a decision around the potential development scenarios and prioritizing the criteria to be used in guiding other plan elements, based on the factors covered in this section. Feedback was collected via: • Working Group discussions and iterative ranking exercises • Individual and group participation in Workshop #3 • Feedback received via Better Together Edina portal Collectively, the results of these three methods favored a scenario that was primarily industrial. Of the four choices, Scenario A was the most favored overall, followed in order by Scenarios C, B, and D. The reasons given were focused on affirming the importance of this area an industrial and employment district controlling increases to city services, while allowing for some change. During the criteria prioritization exercises, the five below had the highest average weighted prioritization: 1. Community Serving: outcomes enhance local community building, expands city amenities, and supports quality of life. 2. Job Creation: anticipated number, type, and quality of jobs that could be created. 3. Public Space and Streetscape Improvements: opportunities to introduce high quality public space and streetscape improvements that enhance land uses, and the district as a destination. 4. Utility Capacity: site and district limitations, opportunities, and analysis needs on sanitary, storm, flooding, and limits on density/intensity. 5. Sustainability: supports city goals of being a leader in sustainability and environmental resilience. This direction has helped shape the recommendations in this plan. On the aspirational side, the plan focuses on ways to advance uses that are community serving and feature improved sustainability, connectivity, and amenity through an enhanced public realm. On the cautionary side, the plan considers how limitations and constraints in public systems (from utilities to schools) should inform a prudent and managed approach to accommodating growth. COSTS OF PROPOSED SCENARIOS DEMAND FOR PUBLIC SERVICES New and intensified development is associated with a range of public sector costs. For the sake of this analysis, it focused primarily on those at the local level, rather than state or federal impacts. With this in mind, the biggest areas of consideration were impacts on the capacity and costs to public schools, public safety and emergency services, and parks and recreation. Schools in particular were raised as a concern due to concerns about system capacity to accommodate growth. DEMAND FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE Likewise, development leads to additional costs with public infrastructure. Again, for the sake of this exercise, the focus was on local impacts. Factors identified include impacts on wastewater, stormwater, and water utility capacity, roadway maintenance and traffic management, and increased demand for transportation-related facilities including pedestrian/bicycle upgrades and parking systems. Sewer and stormwater system capacity in particular were raised as concerns due to preexisting constraints in the current systems. EVALUATION PROCESS It was determined that a full quantitative analysis would not be possible, given that this plan is at a high-level concept stage that lacks the detail needed for full cost/benefit accounting. Additionally, there are some inherent trade-offs between scenarios. For instance, a heavily industrial scenario may have relatively lower public service costs, but also may have lower potential overall public benefits. At the same time, a more mixed-use future could have greater public benefits, but also may have greater public costs. This reflects the fact that value of uses is often capitalized into property values. To overcome these limitations, the scenario evaluation process relied on prioritization exercises via the working group, public engagement, and stakeholder conversations. Participants were asked to evaluate overall importance of key considerations in selecting a scenario, including being able to add their own. SCENARIO EVALUATION The process for evaluating the draft development concepts was an iterative one, based on considering, valuing, and prioritizing a range of community outcomes. Factors considered included the following: BENEFITS OF PROPOSED SCENARIOS FISCAL STABILITY Contributions to fiscal stability include development that stabilizes and/or increases the city’s property tax base. This is important to cover the cost of public infrastructure and city services associated with development, as well as reducing pressure on other taxpaying properties through a growing and diversified tax base. It should be noted that not all benefits to the city are easily quantifiable, so this analysis did not include a full fiscal impact study. Instead, it recognized that new development must overall increase the value or properties, in part through intensification of use of sites through development. SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS Contributions to sustainability are also an important category of benefits, to ensure benefits are long lasting and have enduring value. This includes a broad definition of sustainability to include economic, social, and environmental benefits. In the context of developing the area, this includes factors such as accommodating forecasted job and/or housing growth (economic), providing additional services and options to meet community needs (social), and reducing development’s carbon footprint and environmental impact (environmental). LIVABILITY FACTORS Additionally, livability factors reflect the importance that the development contributes to maintaining and enhancing a high quality of life for the community. This theme came through strongly throughout the planning process, including in its original framing. Factors considered included improved walkability and accessibility, improved opportunities for positive activity and social interaction, enhanced placemaking and identity, and reduced dependency on cars to get around. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT DESCRIPTION OVERALL PLAN AND COMPOSITION The preferred alternative, Scenario A: Open for Business, is a confirmation to maintain the Cahill District as a predominantly jobs- based and working District. With the exception of creating a few defined mixed use areas, the majority of the District’s approximately 380 acres will be dedicated to a variety of job-producing land uses: light industrial, and higher density office. While this Plan confirms the future of the District as one that supports a wide range of employment uses, it is not a plan to maintain the status quo as an isolated underutilized district. The City acknowledges the need to aggressively promote tax base redevelopment and access to in-town jobs for Edina residents. This Plan takes a hands-on approach to ensuring the District adapts to the emerging needs of business districts by promoting flexibility, resilience, partnerships, and outdoor amenities. The Plan anticipates and supports the evolution of the District into one of the premier employment districts in the region by supporting greater intensity of land use, important public realm improvements, greater connections to the community, and clearly defining the edges of the district. DISTRICT CHARACTER AND IDENTITY The character and identity of the District will evolve over time from being a primarily 9-5 weekday District used by people working in the District, to one in which a wider range of people are coming and going into the District - both to work, visit, recreate and live. The prevailing land use will remain focused on jobs, employment and tax base. However the full complement of work in the District will evolve to become cleaner, more refined and advanced, more creative, and more collaborative. Over time, the overall mix of businesses will organically evolve to meet the changing needs of the community with aspirations to become one of the most desireable places in the region to grow a business. The District will continue to leverage its regional access and proximity to the airport and other anchors in the west metro, however increasingly, it will be known for and leverage assets such trail connections, transit access, proximity to local workforce, and connections to nearby neighborhoods and districts. Employees and employers will increasingly choose to locate in the District because it offers access to customers, like and complementary businesses, necessary support services, and outdoor amenities. As the Cahill District evolves it will also become better integrated with its surroundings, while remaining primarily an employment district. Originally designed as an industrial district in the 1960’s, the area was intentionally separated and isolated - intended to be fully oriented to the highways, not the community. This Plan provides targeted recommendations and strategies in land use, transportation, public realm along the edges of the District adjacent to its north and east residential edges. The Cahill District will become a place… …where businesses large and small can find a home to grow alongside a community that cares about its future. …that is entrepreneurial, adaptable, varied, and evolving with a range of building spaces and types that blend advanced industry, commerce, and education/ research. … that provides exceptional access to the nearby workforce and customer base. …that contains a complementary set of live/work options that elevates the character and image of the district. …that excites people, and is attractive to development and investment …where public spaces connect (internally and externally), to help reduce flooding, reinforce the identity of the District, and provide recreational opportunities for employees, visitors and residents. …where street connections and improvements improve safety, wayfinding, circulation, and accessibility for all users while unlocking the development potential of the district. Alternative A: Open For Business Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 29 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VALUE OF APPROACH TO EDINA As a fully built out community in the west metro Cahill District has been under pressure for years to redevelop with housing and other non- employment uses. If land use policy permitted housing, it is likely that many properties would redevelop as such. Nonetheless, there are countervailing reasons to maintain (and improve) Cahill as primarily an employment district. From a fiscal and revenue standpoint, enhancing it as an important tax base contributor to Edina will benefit the entire community. It will reduce the tax burden on the rest of the community while helping Edina to provide critical services to its residents. Having a dedicated area of the city for flexible light industrial uses will allow the City to attract living wage jobs with a low barrier to entry. Furthermore, clean manufacturing, advanced processing and other similar industrial (and commercial/research) companies are essential to the overall health of a regional economy and likely beneficial to many Edina based companies. Allowing them to operate “in town” rather than in a distant industrial park not only keeps the jobs in Edina, but improves their ability to create industry relationships with other businesses in Edina. The benefits of maintaining much of the District as an employment Distict go beyond simply providing tax base. As a relatively affordable place to start and run a business, the District offers an increasingly rare opportunity for Edina residents to live close to work - and for many, to start a business close to work. With time being an increasingly valuable commodity in people’s lives, proximity to work is n increasingly important factor in choosing where to work and live. The District also offers an increasingly scarce opportunity for small businesses that cater to the needs of residents in Edina to be located in close proximity to each other and to their customers. Though not traditional light industrial uses, businesses such as dance studios, framing shops, carpentry shops, and fitness studios that view Edina residents as their customer base can find affordable space in the District. And importantly, Edina residents can patronize them without traveling to a distant community. In recent years the District has become home to a few important social spaces. Minnesota Made (Hockey) and Wooden Hill Brewery are businesses with a social component that have become an important part of Edina’s social fabric. With the introduction of these businesses (and others) the District has become more lively and active on weekends and evenings and more important to the lives of Edina residents. DIVERSITY OF USES / DIVERSITY OF BENEFITS BENEFITS NEIGHBORHOOD NODE COMMERCIAL NODE INDUSTRIAL CORE HIGH DENSITY EMPLOYMENT COMMUNITY MIXED USE FISCAL STABILITY Property tax high high high high high Sales tax high high low medium high Net fiscal benefit medium high high high high LIVABILITY Improved walkability high medium low medium high Social Activity high medium low medium high Placemaking and identity high medium low medium high Reducing Car dependency high medium low low medium Reduced impervious medium low low low medium SUSTAINABILITY Reduced Carbon footprint high medium low low medium Supports Transit Ridership medium medium medium high high New Housing Options high low low low medium GROWTH New jobs and Businesses low medium high high high A complete community needs a variety of development types and land uses. No one type delivers high benefits across all measurements. The future Cahill District will have a range of development types and land uses uses within it. The table below illustrates how the different types yield different benefits to the community. It is important to note that all items in the matrix are COSTS NEIGHBORHOOD NODE COMMERCIAL NODE INDUSTRIAL CORE HIGH DENSITY EMPLOYMENT COMMUNITY MIXED USE DEMAND FOR PUBLIC SERVICES Parks and recreation medium low low low medium Schools medium low low low medium Public Health and Safety medium medium low low medium DEMAND FOR INFRASTRUCTURE Road Maintenance and Traffic medium medium high high medium Pedestrian and bike facilities high medium low low medium Parking for Destination uses low medium low medium medium Water and Sewer Utility capacity medium medium medium high high not identically weighted and the selected alternative recognizes the tradeoffs of emphasizing industrial and employment uses over housing. Furthermore with the scarcity of land in Edina, and the difficulty of creating new employment areas, the presence of such a District carries extra value that is permanently lost if transitioned to non employment uses. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 30 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE THE INTERIOR OF THE DISTRICT The core of the District will remain primarily for business and commerce, permissive with what current employment uses are permitted. Legacy companies will remain in operation; their freight and truck needs will be supported with a roadway network that ensures trucks can operate safely alongside other modes of travel. Other buildings between Cahill and Ohms will continue to evolve towards greater intensification - some with new tenants and more employees, others with additions that add square footage and greater utilization to the site. In order to maintain competitiveness, over time, both private buildings and public space will offer more amenities. Buildings will open up to the HOUSING IN THE DISTRICT - THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS The two residential buildings in the District, (currently separated from each other and isolated in the District) will be supported with adjacent housing and amenities. The northwest corner of the District (home to Amundsen Flats) will become a neighborhood node with additional housing, retail, and neighborhood services. New and existing businesses will co-exist as the area evolves to serve many of the daily needs of nearby Edina residents. Consideration should be given to include this area in one of the adjacent neighborhoods. The northeast corner of the District (home to Creekside) will leverage its position along Nine Mile Creek and with highway access by evolving into a higher density neighborhood-scale mixed use district - with housing and employment uses intermixed. This portion of the District will serve as a transition between the core of the District and the established neighborhoods to the north. In keeping with the desire for the District to have a strong employment component, new housing in the district should explore the possibility of being live/work - that is, housing that is specifically designed to accommodate home based businesses. Live / Work units come in a variety of forms and types depending on the desired separation of “working” from “living”. For example, they can simply be apartment units with extra space for a home office or workshop, a townhouse with a ground floor that is publicly accessible, or even a loft like structure in which the workplace and living space is completely overlapping and flexible. DESCRIPTION OF PLACES WITHIN THE DISTRICT HOUSING IN THE DISTRICT Currently, there are five residential buildings in the District. The plan recommends supporting the existing residential properties by creating small neighborhoods around them, so they are no longer isolated. DEVELOPMENT IN THE INTERIOR Given land constraints and financial viability, it is likely that properties throughout the interior of the district will develop in a variety of ways. Some will make simple improvements to the site and buildings, other may redevelop to a higher and greater use with new buildings. Amundsen Amundsen FlatsFlats THE THE HEIGHTSHEIGHTS PROSPECT PROSPECT KOLLSKOLLS DEWEY DEWEY HILLSHILLS BROOKVIEW BROOKVIEW HEIGHTSHEIGHTS CreeksideCreekside outside, with street-facing entries and patios for employees; and streets will be rebuilt with appropriate sidewalks, public artwork, bike lanes, greater landscaping, and more green infrastructure. A more amenity rich environment will attract new companies and more employees. Consideration should be given to introducing additional business support amenities such as co- working spaces, entrepreneurial hubs, and other emerging enterprises designed to create a strong entrepreneurial eco-system. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 31 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF THE DISTRICT The southern edge of the District also has great potential for redevelopment into high density employment uses. Currently home to a mixture of service, office, and light industrial uses, this edge of the District has strong regional access with highway interchanges to both Hwy 100 and I-494. The area is visible along 494 today, however it is separated from 494 by 60 acres of land in Bloomington. Further coordination with Bloomington will be important for this area to fully realize its potential. In particular, consideration should be given to creating connections between Edina Industrial Boulevard in Edina and 78th Street in Bloomington. Ultimately, this area’s value will rely less on its visibility and access to I-494, and more on how well it is integrated into the Cahill District. THE EAST EDGE OF THE DISTRICT In addition to the northeast and northwest corners of the District, the east and southern edges are anticipated to change significantly over the next 10 years. The eastern edge, between Ohms and Metro Boulevard has the highest potential for redevelopment because it has the most regional visibility and access, and the largest undeveloped parking lots. However there are also significant challenges to redevelopment - namely the high water table and the fact that the area is prone to flooding. With infrastructure improvements to manage flooding, and above ground parking structures, the area can begin to fill in with new office and employment uses. Consideration should be given EDINA Cahill District BLOOMINGTON to realigning, meandering, widening, or otherwise altering the creek and surrounding area to better manage flooding and provide amenity to the entire District. Given stormwater issues in the District, and the benefit of smaller footprint buildings the vision might allow additional height to buildings near the highway (in exchange for smaller footprints, and less impervious surface). This will likely require a review and potential adjustment to the existing height overlay district. Redevelopment of the eastern edge also provides an opportunity to reintegrate the area to the core of the district, rather than towards Metro Boulevard. Extending new east west streets into the superblock, from Ohms, will enable the superblock to orient itself to Ohms. In doing so, approximately 2000’ of Metro Boulevard (5 acres) could become redundant and possibly unnecessary - land that could instead be used for flood storage, recreation, trails, and other important public needs. Flood plain and original location of creek Prior to development : original floodplain today: parking lots and some buildings in the floodplain Re-routed creek and filled flood plain future: redevelopment and expanded floodplain and stormwater management Possible new regional stormwater management Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 32 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE CAHILL NEIGHBORHOOD NODE NEIGHBOHROOD MIXED USE HIGH EMPLOYMENT HIGH EMPLOYMENT BUSINESS NODE INDUSTRIAL CORE OVERALL PLAN AND COMPOSITION NOTE: This is an illustration, not a development proposal. The intention of the illustration is to show the general types and levels of development and public realm changes described in this Plan. C a h i l l A v e C a h i l l A v e I-494I-494Hwy 1 0 0 Hwy 1 0 0 Bus h L a k e R o a d Bus h L a k e R o a d Industrial BlvdIndustrial BlvdCahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 33 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE A B C D E F G F NEIGHBORHOOD NODE HIGH EMPLOYMENT BUSINESS NODE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL CORE NEIGHBORHOOD NODE The Neighborhood Node area is the primary destination for locally- serving businesses catering to the everyday needs of local Edina residents. It will include an mix of local retail and services, including shops offering essential goods and services. The Neighborhood Node is the place to meet neighbors for coffee in the morning, to grab lunch with coworkers, or take your kids to dance studio after work. Multi family housing is integrated into the sub-are for those who choose to live within immediate walking distances of local stores and services BUSINESS NODE The Business Node leverages its prime location at the Edina Industrial Blvd and Hwy 100 interchange to offer a key business- serving commercial destination, and supportive offices. The area will be hub for retail and services oriented to businesses and employees in both the Cahill and Pentagon Park districts. The Business Node will reach peak activity during the workday hours when area employees take the comfortable walk or drive to the area to pick up a large print order, grab lunch with coworkers, or purchase some office supplies. Intergrated amidst these uses will be small- and medium-sized offices. HIGH EMPLOYMENT OFFICE The High Employment Office area offers modern and amenitized office / research buildings for corporations and businesses seeking a Class A environment in the West Metro. The area will attract sectors oriented towards tech and innovation, complimentary to the existing entrepreneurial identity of the District. While industrial buildings and uses would be permitted, portions of the area will redevelop by transitioning large surface lots into more efficient development parcels with stacked parking, outdoor amenities, and multi modal connections to Edina. While this plan is not recommending increased heights as a baseline expectation, given the stormwater issues along the east edge of site, proposals for height and density increases may be considered on a case by case basis relative to project merit and alignment with other plan goals. LAND USE AND SUB AREAS NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE The Neighborhood Mixed Use Activity Center area blends retail, office, and multi-family housing in the north east corner of the District. The resulting mixed-use neighborhood is a place where residents can live, work, and play, offering both daytime employment and services, before turning to evening retail and dining spaces in which to gather and serve as a destination and amenity for surrounding neighborhoods. Modern, multifamily housing complements businesses and services live-work arrangements or simply in comfortable walking distances from employment elsewhere in the district. The area’s public realm includes livable streets that accommodate walking and biking, transit along major routes, and infrastructure that aids in regional flood mitigation. It is anchored by small (public/semi-public) open spaces that incorporates visible green infrastructure. INDUSTRIAL CORE The Industrial Core represents the enterprising essence of the Cahill District. This area is home to for both forward-thinking industries as well as essential support services for the city. Uses here reflect a similar composition of existing businesses — fabricators and manufacturing, community and businesses services, office spaces — and will continue to provide goods and services with local, regional, and global impacts. Through public realm and flood mitigation improvements, the future of the area will evolve into a new economically vibrant and stronger version of itself, with enhanced public spaces and amenities that make this an appealing and competitive destination for entrepreneurs. This future will allow for flexible and adaptive (re)use of existing structures, or new construction to support current use types. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 34 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE • Primarily of retail and services, with some multifamily housing (10-50 units per acre). • Small and medium businesses oriented towards local residents. • Multi-Family housing supports and complements retail and services within the area. • Residences are concentrated along W 70th and Amundson Ave, ensuring clear access and views from the street to retail and services are preserved. TRANSPORTATION • Internal vehicle circulation is improved to consolidate access points and promote parking to the rear of the site. • Area uses are well-supported by multimodal connections, including sidewalks on Cahill and Amundson, a new bike facility along Cahill, and continued transit service, all of which offer connectivity beyond the District • on steet parking is provided on Cahill Avenue PUBLIC REALM & UTILITIES • An improved streetscape along Cahill and Amundson enhances and celebrates area identity while promoting better multimodal connections to and within the area. • Area greening efforts enhance area identity, and reduce impervious coverage and flood risks of the area. • Semi-public gathering places, like outdoor patios or coffee shops, provide unique places to gather. On-Street On-Street ParkingParking EXISTING Looking North on Cahill towards 70th Street PRECEDENT Small gathering places facing onto Cahill Road can provide space for socializing and create a unique identity for the area. NEIGHBORHOOD NODE Ca h i l l R o a d Hwy 1 0 0 Ca h i l l R o a d 494note: please refer to 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan for more information Multi-Use PathMulti-Use Path TransitTransit Building Facelifts and Improved FrontsBuilding Facelifts and Improved Fronts New Mixed Use Building w/ StepbacksNew Mixed Use Building w/ Stepbacks Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 35 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE • Primarily business- and employee-serving retail and services, oriented to employees in Cahill and Pentagon Park. These uses complement the entrepreneurial identity of the larger District, while providing much needed daytime places for meals or informal gathering. • Small- and medium-sized offices integrated within the area. TRANSPORTATION • Access is primarily provided from Edina Industrial Blvd, and Metro Blvd, with clear, well-regulated access points to minimize vehicle conflicts near a busy highway interchange. • Area uses are well-supported by multimodal connections, including sidewalks on Edina Industrial and Metro Blvd, continued transit service, and continued connectivity to both Cahill District and Pentagon Park. PUBLIC REALM & UTILITIES • An improved streetscape anchored by gateway features near the interchange, clearly delineate entrances into the Cahill District while providing an entrepreneurial-focused identity • Semi-public gathering places, like outdoor patios or coffee shops, provide unique places for day-time employees to gather. EXISTING Looking west along Edina Industrial boulevard PRECEDENT Street facing offices, service, and retail will create a new gateway tot he District while serving the support needs of Cahill and Pentagon Park BUSINESS NODE Gateway EntranceGateway Entrance Consolidated Consolidated ParkingParking Gateway buildingGateway building New Entrance/AdditionNew Entrance/Addition Mixed Use OfficeMixed Use Office Hwy 1 0 0 Ca h i l l A v e 494Metro Blvd Edina Industrial BlvdTRY TO FIND REPLACEMENT WITH GREENERY Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 36 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE • Light industrial, office, and community service uses in single and multi-tenant buildings. • Uses embody the entrepreneurial identity of the District, providing a supportive community for businesses to grow and thrive. • The strong economic foundation of the district is further enhanced through natural evolution of more efficient and effective uses that fully leverages the District’s regional location. TRANSPORTATION • Critical regional and local vehicle access is preserved, while roadway improvements are made that further enhance area circulation and safety • Local and regional multimodal improvements are incorporated throughout the area to better connect employees and customers, while providing recreation opportunities via walking and biking. PUBLIC REALM & UTILITIES • The improved streetscape reflects imagery of an entrepreneurial- focused identity, celebrating Edina as a destination employment center in the Twin Cities and beyond. • Area streetscape provides unique gateway features at major area access points, delineating the Cahill District from surrounding neighborhood • Sidewalks are added throughout. • An overhaul of the public realm includes greening features to accommodate flood mitigation and area beautification. INDUSTRIAL CORE REDRAW OR RESCAN 74th St “Cahill Connector”Building ImprovementsBuilding Improvements - additions/entrances- additions/entrances -site improvements-site improvements -rooftop solar-rooftop solar EXISTING Looking east along 72nd Street towards Hwy 100. Bush Lake Rd Ohms Ave Hwy 1 0 0 Ca h i l l A v e 494Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 37 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE • Medium- and large-scale offices and businesses that focus on innovation and collaboration. These uses complement the entrepreneurial identity of the larger District, while providing medium and high intensity, amenity rich office space that is not common today in much of the District • Businesses find a well-resourced home to grow and thrive for the long term as large parking lots are transitined into buildings and greenspace. • Some limited and supportive on-site production or fabrication, so long as it’s tied to the primary office space use and has limited external impacts. TRANSPORTATION • Area uses are well-supported by multimodal connections, including sidewalks and bike facilities on Edina Industrial Blvd and W 78th St, and continued transit service offering regional connectivity. • Vehicle access and circulation is thoughtfully coordinated across sites, to consolidate access points and maximize efficiency and safety of internal circulation and parking. • Employees can comfortably walk or bike to the adjacent Business Node, or enjoy recreation and gathering further north within the Neighborhood Mixed Use Area without the need for a personal vehicle. HIGH EMPLOYMENT EXISTING Shared Shared structured structured parkingparking Interior access and Interior access and DropoffDropoff I-494I-494 Gateways to the Gateways to the DistrictDistrict PUBLIC REALM & UTILITIES • Land use and design guidelines reaffirm a beautiful public realm where buildings are street-oriented, with minimal setbacks and clear sightlines, and gathering places reflect and celebrate the District’s entrepreneurial identity, and this area’s innovative employers and workers. • The public realm (on the east edge) incorporates visible, green stormwater management best practices, and considers significant flood mitigation opportunities. • The improved streetscape reflects imagery of an entrepreneurial- focused identity, celebrating Edina as a destination employment center in the Twin Cities and beyond. Bush Lake Rd Bush Lake Rd In d u s t r i a l B l v d In d u s t r i a l B l v d Hwy 1 0 0 Ca h i l l A v e 494Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 38 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE HIGH EMPLOYMENT (CONT’D) EXISTING The east edge of the district, between Metro Boulevard and Ohms Ave is designated for High Employment . As discussed elsewhere in the Plan, this area has a high water table, extensive surface parking lots and a realigned creek - as a result it experiences flooding. The Plan recognizes the need for extensive flood mitigation around the area of the creek. A broad strategy to address flooding, parking and redevelopment is likely necessary for this area to realize its potential and its contribution to the District. stormwater and stormwater and recreational recreational amenityamenity Hwy 1 0 0 Ohms A ve HW Y 1 0 0 Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 39 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE • Residences compliment employment, retail uses and some light industrial uses to elevate the employment-centered character and economic vitality of the broader District. This is accomplished through vertical and horizontal mixed use, including live-work arrangements. • Area residences (20-75 units/acre) are concentrated near multimodal transportation options including regional bike and transit facilities. • Day-time employment and vibrant evening gathering spaces give local residents and workers opportunities to connect with each other both during and after the work day. • While this plan is not recommending increased heights as a baseline expectation, given the stormwater issues along the east edge of site, proposals for height and density increases may be considered on a case by case basis relative to project merit and alignment with other plan goals. TRANSPORTATION • Attractive destinations and neighborhood focal points are well- supported by multi-modal connections, including sidewalks, bike lanes, and transit along major routes, offering connectivity beyond the District. • Navigation is easy and accessible from both adjacent employment areas and surrounding neighborhoods, with easily definable points of entry and routes, supported by an attractive public realm. Emplyment uses along the Emplyment uses along the highway; shared parkinghighway; shared parking Housing and Live Housing and Live / work units/ work units Central Central Gathering Gathering Spaces and Spaces and StormwaterStormwater EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE Ohms AveOhms Ave 70th St70th St Hwy 100Hwy 100 Hwy 1 0 0 Ca h i l l A v e 494PUBLIC REALM & UTILITIES • Land use and design guidelines reaffirm a beautiful public realm where buildings are street-oriented, with minimal setbacks and clear sightlines, and gathering places reflect and celebrate the District’s entrepreneurial identity. • The public realm incorporates visible, green stormwater management best practices, and considers significant flood mitigation opportunities. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 40 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE JOBS AND RESIDENTIAL YIELDS FROM SCENARIO A The table at the right shows the future land use guidance required to accomodate each of the subareas which form Scenario A. Additionally, estimates for total Cahill District jobs, residential units, and property tax capacities are also provided in the table to demonstrate Scenario A’s potential when fully developed. These calculations were determined based on a set of assumptions, also shown here, which were informed by the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the 70th and Cahill Neighborhood Node Plan. SUBDISTRICT FUTURE LAND USE GUIDANCE ESTIMATED JOB YIELD* ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL UNIT YIELD* Neighborhood Node Neighborhood Node 200 175 Mixed Neighborhood Office Residential 575 1,100 Industrial Core Industrial 3,250 0 High Employment Industrial (prioritizing office uses)6,700 0 Business Node Office (prioritizing retail uses)175 0 TOTAL 10,900 1,275 *Job and residential yields were based on City future land use density guidance, and an estimated distribution of use types within each subdistrict, as outlined in Appendix D. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 41 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Public Realm Plan Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 43 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm FRameWORK cOnTeXT: Surrounding physical, cultural, and economic conditions uSe & cOmFORT: Intended users and subsequent comfort and safety of accessing and using the space PROGRamminG & DeSiGn: Space design, activities, flexibility, circulation cOnnecTiOnS: Space access, linkages, wayfinding, and role within surrounding networks VaRieTY: Diversity of space sizes, types, and locations within surrounding networks 1. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY (ROW): Publicly-owned spaces intended for public use. Improvements are planned, implemented, and managed by public entities. • Streets, trails, public buildings and frontage, art in public property, Nine Mile Creek 2. QUASI-PUBLIC: Privately-owned spaces intended for public use. Improvements are generally driven by private ownership, but the design and internal operations are guided, in part, by public policies. • Restaurants, retail and shops, patios, plazas 3. PRIVATE, PUBLICLY VISIBLE: Privately-owned spaces not open to public use, but are visible to the public and contribute to overall area aesthetics and character. Improvements are generally driven by private ownership, but the external design is guided by public policies. • Building facades, artwork on private property, vegetation, ponds The Cahill District Public Realm Plan uses the framework below to establish a public realm understanding, and set of recommendations to improve the District’s public realm. Each of the follow five framework components provide a lens in which to understand and ascribe improvement opportunities across the District. Generally speaking, there are three primary areas of focus for this public realm plan. Each carries a different level of City ability to influence change, particularly for areas that are solely private. Collectively however, these three areas inform the form, function, perception, and “feeling” experienced by people in any given place. MOST PUBLIC INFLUENCE LEAST PUBLIC INFLUENCE Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 44 Public Realm PlanPublic ROW - STReeT neTWORK The majority of the District’s current public realm is comprised of the Public Right of Way (ROW), which contains the public street network. This network reflects purposeful steps taken to separate the industrial park from surrounding uses. As such, streets are wide with minimal streetscape, pedestrian, or bike amenities, and there are few direct through-streets. As residential segments of Edina grew around the District, there was legitimate need to discourage casual or convenient access into the District as it operated predominantly with light and heavy industrial activities and an active rail line. More recently however, District land uses has evolved into a diversity of community-serving uses interspersed with traditional industrial. As a result, the need for more intuitive and accommodating access and circulation has created design and connectivity tensions within the changing District. Multimodal improvements have certainly been introduced, however most streets remain predominantly designed for vehicles with minimal connections for employees hoping to walk to lunch with coworkers, or nearby residents seeking to visit areas businesses. SUBAREA PUBLIC ROW STREET GUIDANCE* Neighborhood Node Coordinate with Metro Transit on future route access and stop needs; Continue coordinating with Three Rivers Park District on CP Regional Trail; Continue to review roadway and multimodal facility conditions, repairing and replacing according to Edina’s Living Street’s Policy. Industrial Core In conjunction with the CP Trail, establish a multimodal east-west connection route along 74th St; Explore the feasibility of a Continue to review roadway and multimodal facility conditions, repairing and replacing according to Edina’s Living Street’s Policy. Business Node Continue to review roadway and multimodal facility conditions, repairing and replacing according to Edina’s Living Street’s Policy. Neighborhood Mixed Use Identify opportunities to connect future land uses with the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail; Continue to review roadway and multimodal facility conditions, repairing and replacing according to Edina’s Living Street’s Policy. High Density Employment Coordinate with Bloomington on street repair and reconstruction partnerships and designs; Continue to review roadway and multimodal facility conditions, repairing and replacing according to Edina’s Living Street’s Policy. ROaDWaY neTWORK ROleS Cahill is well served on its exteriors by a series of streets that provide either east-west, or north-south connectivity. Internally, the 74th St / Bush Lake Rd / Dewey Rd connection is the only east-west connector through the district. This critical route connects the Ohms Ln/Metro Blvd and Cahill Rd north-south routes. Particularly unique to the District roadway networks is that it provides direct access to two highways/interstates via three interchanges. Many industrial parks are oriented around one or two interchanges providing regional or statewide access. Cahill’s access to three is part of what makes the site so attractive. *More guidance details are located throughout the rest of the Public Realm Plan 74th St Dewey Hill Rd 70th St N/S Access Critical Internal E/W Connector N/S Access N/S Access Hwy 100 Access Hwy 100 Access I-494 Access E/W Access E/W Access Cahill RdMetro BlvdOhms LnEdina Ind. Blvd caHill ROaD aT DeWeY ROaD 74TH STReeT OHmS lane Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 45 Public Realm PlanThe Cahill District was built atop of a fairly sizeable, low lying wetlands, with Nine Mile Creek likely winding through the center of the District. The wetlands were eventually consolidated to the northeast segment of the District, while the creek was rerouted, possibly multiple times, to the east edge of District along Hwy 100. As a result of these actions much of the District experiences regular flooding as natural drainage locations surround building foundations, parking lots, streets, and other built areas. In addition to localized flooding, poor drainage conditions create fairly significant development barriers as any impervious cover must adhere to Watershed stormwater management rate and quality requirements. Excess water from flood events compound watershed management requirements that all developments and impervious areas must adhere to. Compliance is required for most new development, and site improvement or renovations over certain thresholds. The lack of public open space creates constraints in collecting and treating stormwater on a regional or semi-regional manner. As a result, most properties treat stormwater on-site and below ground, which is often more expensive and harder to maintain than regional approaches. This creates additional barriers to prospective site improvements or new development, which must address stormwater completely on site. Underground treatment may allow for more development. Alternatively, stormwater management my take a regional approaches that collect and treat stormwater in “stacked” infrastructure, generally within public ROW. There are often many cost and water quality benefits of this approach, and a stacked approach can amenitize infrastructure towards increased public and market value. 1. Urban soils are often unhealthy and compact, causing them to become impermeable to precipitation and causing runoff 2. Bioswales and other planted drainage features can double as bump outs to calm traffic. 3. Larger rain events are directed to overflow structures and drains systems 4. Tree planters or trenches collect and filter water for uptake by street trees 5. On street parking could be converted to permeable pavement that drains and filters stormwater and connects to below grade drainage 6. Reduced travel lanes decreases impervious area and increases space for stormwater management Public ROW - STORmWaTeR STacKeD STORmWaTeR manaGemenT 1. Green space soils are often healthier and have better drainage then urban soils 2. Open water collects storm water while contributing to area aesthetics. 3. Planted floodplain offers additional filtration and collection for large rain events. 4. Below grade storm drains collects and delivers stormwater to collection basins 5. Green space can be “stacked” atop stormwater functions to create passive or active recreation and gathering. Creating a public amenity. 6. Green space and stormwater management should be a connected system to promote biodiversity 7. Access from surrounding areas is critical to promoting usage and enjoymentCP10070thCahillMetro74thOhms76thBush Lake78t h Dewey Hill Edina Industrial 73rd Delaney 72ndVillage Abercrom b i e AmundsonOak Glen 77thRabun CeciliaNormandalePondwood Trillium AspasiaHillsideNormandale NormandaleN o r m a n d a l e Cahill District Plan City of Edina, MN Local Flood Depth (100-Year Storm) December 2022 Map Document: C:\Users\LOCAL_~1\Temp\arc67F8\Water_Resources_Base.mxd | Date Saved: 12/5/2022 2:17:03 PMLegend !I Flood Depth (ft) 0 0 - 1.2 1.2-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.2 4.2-5.4 5.4-6.7 6.7-8.4 8.4-13.1 0 600Feet Source: STReeTS FlOOD aReaS anD DePTHS in THe caHill DiSTRicT OPen WaTeR anD GReen SPace CAHILL FLOOD AND STORMWATER QUICK FACTS The District contains approximately 80 acre/feet of flood area (for a 100-year flood). Within the District, there are approximately 50 acres of available ROW — the majority of which is dedicated to public streets. At that rate, about 1.5 feet of water management depth for every square foot of ROW would be needed just to sufficiently manage flood areas. This is impractical both from a cost and spatial perspective. As such, to aide in treating area flooding and reducing development barriers, opportunity-driven partnerships should be explored for locations that could accommodate new, stacked public stormwater and public space infrastructure. SUBAREA STORMWATER GUIDANCE* Neighborhood Node Prioritize the further exploration of regional stormwater and flood management strategies, considering stacking with public amenity infrastructure, adjoining to or rerouting of the creek, or similar value-adding features; Ensure clarity of stormwater and flood management requirements for all new development, expansion, or renovation projects; Industrial Core Business Node Maintain openness for opportunity-driven regional stormwater and flood management strategies, stacking with public amenity infrastructure whenever possible; Ensure clarity of stormwater and flood management requirements for all new development, expansion, or renovation projects. Neighborhood Mixed Use High Density Employment *More details on public ROW guidance is located in the rest of the Public Realm Plan Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 46 Public Realm PlanQuaSi-Public SPace Quasi-Public spaces are those that are privately owned, but intended primarily for public use. These uses, such as restaurants, retail stores, or private plazas, are sometimes referred to as the “third space” as they are private places in which many people spend time between home and work or school. While critical to overall aesthetics and character of an area, the city’s influence over these places is generally limited to design guidance during initial development review, then the on-going quality and safety inspections of applicable businesses. To best leverage the benefits of quasi-public spaces, the city should proactively seek to established land use and design guidance that incentives, or requires, quality spaces that are easily accessible to the public. Further, quasi-public spaces should have clear visibility and access, which are critical to fostering a positive environment in which these places may thrive. SUBAREA QUASI-PUBLIC SPACE GUIDANCE Neighborhood Node Require sidewalks and street access; Incentivize provision of outdoor public space such as plazas, outdoor dining, lawns, greenspace; Clear guidelines for pedestrian scale design; Allow retail use; Clear sign code guidelines to allow for creative and artistic signage, patron wayfinding. Industrial Core Allow retail use, clear sign code guidelines for creative and artistic signage. Business Node Allow retail use; clear guidelines for pedestrian scale design; require sidewalks and street access; incentivize provision of outdoor public space such as plazas, outdoor dining, lawns, greenspace; sign code guidelines allow for creative and artistic signage, patron wayfinding. Neighborhood Mixed Use High Employment Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 47 Public Realm PlanPRiVaTe buT PubliclY ViSible Private but publicly visible spaces are those that are privately owned, are not intended for public use, but are visible from the public realm. Within Cahill these are primarily the larger industrial or office sites. Usually this includes building facades, landscaping, and other visible external features. They can however include interior spaces if visible through windows or porous exteriors. These spaces embody most of the district, and significantly contribute to overall aesthetics and character. The city’s influence over these places is generally limited to design guidance during initial development review, and the occasional code inspection or violation complaint. To best leverage the benefits of private but publicly visible spaces, the city should proactively seek to established land use and design guidance that incentives, or requires, quality landscape, attractive building frontage, art and signage, and parking in the rear. Additionally, reducing setbacks for buildings are also pedestrian-scaled, especially at entrances, can aide in creating a more inviting and attractive realm. SUBAREA PRIVATE BUT PUBLICLY VISIBLE GUIDANCE Neighborhood Node Clear design guidelines for building materials, facades, windows, and other exterior features; Clear guidelines for pedestrian scale design; Incentives for art and landscape in private realm; Sign code guidelines allow for creative and artistic signage. Industrial Core Clear design guidelines for building materials, facades, windows, and other exterior features; incentives for art in private realm; sign code guidelines allow for creative and artistic signage. Business Node Clear design guidelines for building materials, facades, windows, and other exterior features; Clear guidelines for pedestrian scale design; Incentives for art and landscape in private realm; Sign code guidelines allow for creative and artistic signage. Neighborhood Mixed Use High Density Employment Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 48 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT The public realm plan for the Cahill District applies the public realm framework and understanding of public realm improvement areas, towards envisioning enhanced connectivity, improved streetscape, clearer wayfinding, and unique district aesthetics. The Plan also identifies preliminary locations that are likely conducive to opportunity-driven regional stormwater and public space solutions. A. Enhanced Streetscape B. Gateways & Wayfinding C. Pedestrian-Oriented Activity Areas D. Regional Stormwater Opportunities E. Street Network Typology F. CP Trail G. Dewey Hill Intersection H. Transit Public Realm Plan SecTiOnS Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 49 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT enHanceD STReeTScaPe The District is in need of a clearly defined, quality east-west interior connection routes that stitches together the planned CP Trail to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, while facilitating strong multimodal circulation. The “Cahill Connector” route would connect Cahill Rd to 70th St, via Dewey Hill, Bush Lake Rd, 74th St, Ohms Ln, 72nd St, and Metro Blvd. This would be a similar route to the proposed “Twin Loops” route from the City Ped and Bike Master Plan. Enhanced streetscape like street trees, strong wayfinding, art, and street furniture where appropriate would be applied along the route. These elements would aid in establishing a centralized sense of place, while connecting the Neighborhood Mixed Use subdistrict to Lewis Park and uses west of the district. Associated multimodal elements, described in more detail later, would provide for a roadway that balances walking and biking with necessary vehicle traffic. The resulting “complete street” would align with guidance provided by the City’s living streets policy. Enhance streetscape and a shared use path along the “Cahill Connector” would offer improved interior access, visibility, and sense of place. ENHANCED STREETSCAPE LOCATIONS: • Cahill Rd from 70th St to Edina Industrial Blvd • Dewey Hill from Cahill Rd to Bush Lake Rd • Bush Lake Dr from Dewey Hill to 74th St • W 74th St from Bush Lake Rd to Ohms Ln • Metro Blvd from 72nd St to 70th St Future CP TrailFuture CP Trail 74th St74th St Dewey Hill RdDewey Hill Rd Ohms LnOhms Ln Bush Lake RdBush Lake Rd Cahill RdCahill Rd “Cahill Connector”“Cahill Connector” “Cahill Connector”“Cahill Connector” Connection with Nine Mile Connection with Nine Mile Creek Regional TrailCreek Regional Trail Connection with CP Connection with CP Regional TrailRegional Trail “Cahill Connector”“Cahill Connector” Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 50 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT Gateways create clear and defining “transition moments” to signify that you are entering into a distinct area. Locating even simple gateway features at some of the major entrances to the Cahill District can aid in establishing the District’s identity as a destination employment center. Gateway elements can range from simple signage to ornate pieces of large art, but may also include portions of or entire buildings - particularly buildings with notable frontage or design. Location and available ROW often dictate the size, scale, and design of any gateway feature. Associated wayfinding, which would benefit from reflecting imagery established by gateways, should provide for clear orientation, directions to major landmarks, and general ease of multimodal circulation throughout the district. Wayfinding is generally located at intersections and major destinations or landmarks. Gateway & Wayfinding Considerations Gateways are most effective when clearly visible, are at major locations of transition, and when they convey a clear sense of place in regards to surrounding context. This can be communicated through height, unique materials, shapes, colors, or lettering, or even feature location such as along a building or in the middle of a road median. For the Cahill District, gateway features should mark entrances into the district, while selecting materials and design styles that evoke entrepreneurship, innovation, technology, and sustainability. To further enhance gateway impacts, and an overarching district identify, motifs established within gateway features should be reflected in district wayfinding and public space designs. GATEWAY LOCATIONS • Cahill Rd at Dewey Hill Rd • Metro Blvd at 70th St • Edina Industrial Blvd at Hwy 100 Interchange • Bush Lake Rd at Edina Industrial Blvd Major gateway location concept at the business node along Edina Industrial Blvd Major gateway location and mini-roundabout concept at the Dewey Hill Rd entrance at Cahill Rd Minor gateway location concept at the north entrance to the neighborhood mixed used subdistrict Gateway feature in downtown Hopkins, with associated wayfinding that reflect branding and imagery established by the main gateway feature Minor gateway location concept at entrance to the industrial core at Bush Lake Rd and Edina Industrial Blvd GaTeWaYS & WaYFinDinG Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 51 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT Pedestrian-oriented activity areas are locations intended for regular, public usage such as retail, dining, living, or entertainment. For the Cahill District, these are the Neighborhood and Business Nodes and the Neighborhood Mixed Use subdistrict. To best accommodate this purpose, land uses in these areas are intended to generally be oriented towards a pedestrian scale, and provide quasi public spaces that invite people to gather. Development and design at this scale also improves clarity of circulation for all users, making it easier to access local businesses. Because nearly all land in these areas are private, it is expected that any public-oriented open spaces will be privately provided and managed. This likely would include plazas, outdoor dining, or pocket parks associated with retail or residential uses. If well designed, these spaces should comfortably connect with adjacent sidewalks and trails, with clear lines of sites and wayfinding. PEDESTRIAN SCALE DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS • 70th & Cahill Neighborhood Node • Neighborhood Mixed Use Subdistrict • Business Node Subdistrict PeDeSTRian-ORienTeD acTiViTY aReaS Business Business NodeNode Neighborhood Neighborhood Mixed UseMixed UseNeighborhood Neighborhood NodeNode Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 52 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT Regional (multi-site) approaches to water management are often more efficient and sustainable approaches to treating stormwater and flood water. Generally speaking however, without public sector involvement and land ownership, coordinating water management across multiple sites and owners his a very difficult task. The lack of public open space therefore presents barriers for comprehensively addressing either stormwater or flood management beyond a site-by-site approach. While stormwater management certainty carries specific permitting criteria, efficient use of water management could also aid in addressing flood management and stormwater requirements. These efforts will require partnerships with private property owners to identify excess land during site redevelopment and infrastructure coordination. As such, these improvements are anticipated to be opportunity-driven as sites redevelop. To be most effective in providing public and private benefits, these systems should treat multiple properties while creating visual or recreation amenity, or gathering space. As indicated top right, two large “soft” sites - those with low percentages of building coverage - could more easily accommodate new development and are located in areas of concentrated flooding adjacent Nine Mile Creek. Both site may provide favorable locations for these major opportunity water management and amenity improvements. PRELIMINARY REGIONAL STORMWATER LOCATIONS • Cahill Rd at Dewey Hill Rd • Metro Blvd at 70th St • Edina Industrial Blvd at Hwy 100 Interchange • Bush Lake Rd at Edina Industrial Blvd Large parking lot within Neighborhood Mixed Use subdistrict that could be a location for stacked water management and public green space, creating public amenity for future adjacent uses. The adjacency of Nine Mile Creek and wetlands could present opportunities to tie in open water features. Large parking lot within Neighborhood Mixed Use subdistrict that could be a location for stacked water management and public green space, creating public amenity for future adjacent uses. The adjacency to Nine Mile Creek could present unique opportunities to tie-in open water management with the creek, possibly even rerouting portions of it. ReGiOnal STORmWaTeR & FlOOD manaGemenT Metro BlvdMetro Blvd Hwy 100Hwy 100 Hwy 100Hwy 100 Metro BlvdMetro BlvdOhms LnOhms Ln Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 53 Public Realm PlanTravel lanes, driveways, and intersection corners are wider to accommodate trucks and larger vehicles. Any bike facilities are off-street, and there may be few or no marked crosswalks at intersections. Minimal streetscape elements are likely included. Travel lanes and intersections are designed to comfortably and safely balance personal and delivery vehicles, some trucks, and pedestrians, with possible bike facilities included as either on-street, or off-street. Multimodal emphasis however is placed on sidewalks and pedestrian connections. Modest-to-high quality streetscape elements are included. Travel lanes and intersections are designed with enhanced pedestrian and bike facilities, while accommodating personal and delivery vehicles, and some local trucks. Higher quality and unique streetscape is concentrated along this route. The Connector intends to enhance the key east-west access in the District, while connecting the CP and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trails. Opportunity locations for new paths, trails, or street connections to create better internal circulation and connectivity. Each location should be opportunity-driven, and will require coordination with private property owners. The Canadian Pacific Rail Regional Trail will link the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail to the Hyland Park Reserve in Bloomington. The approved alignment runs along Bush Lake Road, Dewey Hill Road, and Cahill Road, then merges with existing facilities on 70th Street. ROADS ACCOMODATING TRUCKS ROADS THAT BALANCE ALL USERS CAHILL CONNECTOR (enhanced, multi-modal route) FUTURE CP Trail POTENTIAL NEW CONNECTIONS A critical step to identifying public roadway improvements is to ascribe a user-based typology to the existing roadway, while anticipating users for possible future roadways. In doing so, design decisions can be tailored to best serve intended users on a street segment, while considering impacts on adjacent land uses. Three categories were developed for the District that intended to provide and balance the provision of routes for different user groups, while ensuring current and future land uses are well served by the public transportation network. The City of Edina’s Living Streets Plan provides a foundational element of this roadway typology approach. As redevelopment occurs throughout the district, the city will utilize development-specific impacts and this roadway typology framework to continue to assess roadway and intersection design needs. 74th St 76th St Dewey Hill Rd Edina Ind. Blvd.78th S tCahill Rd70th St Bush Lake RdOhms LnMetro BlvdNine Mile Creek Regional Trail Cahill Rd On-street bike lanes 70th St On-street bike lanes Public Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT ROaDWaY TYPOlOGieS EXISTING BIKE FACILITY Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 54 Public Realm PlanEXISTING BIKE FACILITY BIKE & PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ROUTES Using the roadway typology and planned improvements, a new network of multimodal improvements can better connect users to, and through, the district. Anchored internally by an enhanced “Cahill Connector”, these routes provide internal access and circulation for those walking and biking, while maintaining safe circulation and access for necessary vehicle traffic. They will also aid in health promoting design by allowing more sidewalks for walking trips to areas businesses, or for employees and future residents who simply want to go for a walk. Public Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT mulTimODal enHancemenTS ROADS THAT BALANCE ALL USERS CAHILL CONNECTOR (enhanced, multi-modal route) FUTURE CP TRAIL Cahill Rd Dewey Hill Rd 65’ ROW 60’ ROW 60’ ROW 66’ ROW 74th St 70th St DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe Most dedicated street ROW in the district provides 60’ of available space, enough for two comfortable travel lanes, sidewalks, and grass boulevards. Along the Cahill Connector and southern portion of Bush Lake Road, an additional shared use path would be introduced to accommodate bikes and pedestrians users. Along Cahill Road, 74th Street, and Ohms Lane, on-street parking could be provided to accommodate adjacent businesses, or future residents in the Neighborhood Mixed Use subdistrict. 74th St Bush Lake RdOhms Ln70th St Edina Ind. Blvd 78th S t Dewey Hill Rd Cahill Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 55 Public Realm Plan76th St Edina Ind. Blvd Dewey Hill RdCahill RdHeavy truck traffic will remain a vital component of the District for the foreseeable future, and accommodating these vehicles is critical to ongoing area competitiveness. Recognizing this need, and in effort to mitigate conflicts between roadway users, heavier truck traffic should be encouraged to use the south and west edges of the district whenever able. Further, encouraging heavy truck use of the southern Hwy 100 interchange will keep truck traffic out of the more residential and retail portions of the District’s northern edge. While this should be encouraged, this plan does not recommend formally designating truck- only routes, so as to maintain street use and design flexibility. TRUCK PRIORITY ROUTES Public Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT ROaDS accOmmODaTinG HeaVY TRucKS ROADS FAVORING TRUCKS POTENTIAL NEW CONNECTIONS PREFERRED TRUCK ACCESS FROM HWY 100/I-494 78th St Dewey Hill Road DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe DRaFT - SubJecT TO cHanGe 76th Street Bush Lake Road Edina Industrial Boulevard Roadway segments along these routes should be designed to comfortably and safely accommodate larger trucks. This means wider travel lanes, driveways, and turn radii. Bike facilities along these segments should avoid the inclusion of on-street bike facilities to mitigate conflicts. Each roadway has sufficient ROW, so sidewalks should be included on one or both sides of each segement, which would also mitigate people walking in the street. Bush Lake Road, particularly between 74th Street and 76th Street, may warrant on-street parking to address localized parking needs associated with adjacent retail and recreation uses. This parking however should be mindful of sightlines and truck turn needs at driveways and intersections. Bush Lake Rd65’ ROW 60’ ROW 60’ ROW 60’ ROW Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 56 Public Realm PlanThree Rivers Park District’s planned CP Rail Regional Trail will offer a significant new regional connection through the district, the confluence of a two-trail head at 70th St/Cahill Rd, and a chance for better pedestrian and bike connections within the district. The draft trail master plan provides a suggested route alignment and facility design guidance, which is reflected below. Cahill Road: The approximately 65’ existing ROW could accommodate the Trail if existing on-street bike lanes are removed, which would be redundant to the regional trail. A west-running trail maintains bike access to Lewis park and residential uses west of Cahill, but would require a two phase crossings at the Dewey Hill intersection. CP TRAIL/SHARED USE PATH The CP Trail will be an off-street shared use path, to allow for consolidated bike and ped usage, while minimizing conflicts with on- street truck and vehicle traffic Trail along west side Trail along west side of Cahill Rdof Cahill Rd Trail along north side Trail along north side of Dewey Hill Rdof Dewey Hill Rd Shared use path crossing to Shared use path crossing to north side 74th St “Cahill north side 74th St “Cahill Connector” with wayfindingConnector” with wayfinding Trail continues west on Trail continues west on Bush Lake RdBush Lake Rd “Cahill Connector”“Cahill Connector” 74th St Bush Lake RdWest Side, Bush Lake Rd North Side, Dewey Hill Rd West Side, Cahill Rd 70th St Edina Industrial Blvd Dewey Hill RdCahill Rd78th St Public Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT cP TRail aliGnmenT cP TRail DeSiGn GuiDance FROm DRaFT TRail maSTeR Plan City-owned shared City-owned shared use pathuse path CP TrailCP Trail CP TrailCP Trail While the draft master plan suggest a 10’ shared use path for the Trail design, updated best practices now suggest a 12’ path where possible, with 10’ as a minimum width. Much of the District could likely accommodate a 12’ trail width, and should utilize that design whenever able. Dewey Hill Road Intersection: Redesigning the intersection as a mini roundabout, described in more detail later in this section, would improve crossing safety, despite the two-phased crossing required. The Trail alignment may present some conflicts with the otherwise heavy truck traffic entering/leaving the district at that intersection, however, highly visible crossing markings and locations can help mitigate these issues. Dewey Hill Road: With equal numbers of driveways on both sides of the street, a north running trail allows for a single crossing from Cahill Rd, but would require an additional crossing at the intersection with Bush Lake Rd. Bush Lake Road: A west-running trail avoids all intersection crossings and presents comparatively less topography issues. It would also allow for safer access and turn movements as the trail transitions to West 78th St. Concept illustration for trail crossing at Cahill Rd and Dewey Hill Rd intersection, with a mini roundabout. Not an exact representation of mini roundabout final design City-owned shared City-owned shared use pathuse path Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 57 Public Realm PlanThe Cahill / Dewey Hill intersection was designed to accommodate turn movements of large trucks. The intersection purposefully deters casual or comfortable through-traffic, especially traffic traveling from the west on Dewey Hill Rd across Cahill Rd. The intersection has become increasingly difficult to navigate as District uses have evolved towards attracting more personal vehicle and retail traffic. An alternative option that would improve intersection safety and operations is a mini-roundabout at the intersection. Compared to traditional intersections, roundabouts such as the concept shown here have demonstrated less traffic delays, reduction in crashes, result in fewer idling vehicles, and present less vehicle/ped/bike conflict points. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Recommended Cahill Intersection Dimension Min 90’ diameter 160’ diameter AADT < 10,000 6,600 MPH < 30mph 25mph (signed) Public Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT DeWeY Hill / caHill RD inTeRSecTiOn mini ROunDabOuT cOncePT The above concept, which is meant as an illustration of a mini roundabout, would allow for continued truck access especially if truck traffic is preferred along the segment of Cahill south of the intersection. The center island of the mini-roundabout is surmountable, allowing for large truck traffic leaving Dewey Hill Rd to south-bound Cahill Rd to drive harmlessly over the center island, as shown in this MnDOT Diagram. Bike and ped crossings occur at marked locations, and are pulled back from the middle of the intersection to be at “splitter islands”. These islands also act as bike and ped refuges for safer crossing. MnDOT diagram on mini-roundabouts CP TrailCP Trail CP TrailCP Trail Center island with Center island with gateway featuregateway feature SidewalkSidewalk CP Trail CP Trail crossingcrossing Ped Ped crossingcrossing City owned City owned shared use pathshared use path SidewalkSidewalk Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 58 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT TRanSiT STOP DeSiGn anD acceSS Metro Transit Routes which currently serve the district are Local Route 6K and Frequent Local Route 540. These are the only two active routes within the district. Route 542 was suspended due to ridership impacts of COVID, and has not returned to operation. Both of these active routes terminate in or near the district, with the nearest transfer points just east of the district at the Southdale Transit Center, and stops surrounding the I-35W/I-494 Interchange. The E Line BRT, scheduled for completion in 2025, will terminate at Southdale Transit Center and provide additional adjacent regional access. Seventeen bus stops are located within the district, all of which lack bus shelters. Metro Transit Bus Stop Design Guidelines Metro Transit’s Bus stop design guidelines are crucial to identifying how the Cahill District plan could support physical improvements to transit access. While offering design best practices, the stop design guidelines can also suggest opportunities to pursue targeted bus stop improvements, improving safety and ease of access for transit riders. An assessment of each transit stop within the District was conducted using Metro Transit design criteria of stop pedestrian access, boarding access, bench, slope, and stop length. Transit stops were then given a cumulative score to inform which locations should be prioritized for future improvements. A full stop review is included in Appendix B. The pending CP Trail and associated roadway improvements along that route would be an opportunity to address substandard stop locations along Cahill, Dewey Hill Rd, and Bush Lake Rd. Additionally, future (re) development adjacent transit stops should also be improve stop designs. Stop on the island at the Intersection of Cahill Rd and Dewey Hill Rd Dewey Rd and Bush Lake Rd intersection Metro Blvd south of 76th St As other public realm improvements occur, such as the Cahill Connector, each should consider opportunities for stop location improvements as part of the design and construction process. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 59 Public Realm PlanPublic Realm Plan FOR THe caHill DiSTRicT Plan imPlemenTaTiOn The following is a preliminary list of initial steps the City of Edina should take towards implementing the Public Realm Plan. A more robust implementation plan is included in the following section of this Plan. Implementation steps are not listed in order of priority. ENHANCED STREETSCAPE Utilizing guidance from the city’s Living Street policy and other best practices, enhance streetscape aesthetics along the Cahill Connector route, and ensure alignment with the future CP Trail. These improvements should be implemented alongside any street retrofit or reconstruction along the Cahill Connector Route, and aid in establishing a sense of place through the core of the District. GATEWAYS & WAYFINDING Commission a branding and wayfinding plan for the District to establish a gateway and wayfinding pattern book. This resource would detail designs, materials, and locations for district gateways, wayfinding, art, and related elements. PEDESTRIAN SCALE DEVELOPMENT Review and update the zoning code to ensure zoning districts associated with the Neighborhood Node, Business Node, and Neighborhood Mixed Use districts are provided guidance to encourage pedestrian scale development. REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT Commission a subwatershed assessment of the District to better understanding geotechnical conditions, opportunities, and constraints for regional and semi-regional stormwater and flood management approaches. Facilitate conversations with current property owners of “soft sites” (low coverage sites that could most easily accommodate new development) to explore potential partnerships towards regional, stacked water management opportunities that could also add value to their properties. As redevelopment occurs in the district, continue conversations with owners on these value added, opportunity-driven improvements. MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS Utilizing guidance from the city’s Living Streets policy, and section recommendations from this plan, incorporate multimodal roadway improvements throughout the district, during planned street retrofit reconstruction. Priority should be given to those routes along the Cahill Connector. PREFERRED TRUCK ROUTE Coordinate with area business owners, particularly large industrial and shipping businesses, to direct trucks along preferred truck routes along the west edge of the District. Future wayfinding should consider orientation and markers to support this. CP TRAIL Continue working and coordinating with Three Rivers towards the timing, siting, and design of the trail, ensuring final details bring benefits to the city and district. Align the project to consider improvements elsewhere in the district, including the Dewey Hill intersection and multimodal improvements along the Cahill Connector route. DEWEY HILL INTERSECTION Commission an intersection study of the Cahill Rd / Dewey Hill Rd intersection to confirm feasibility and design details of a mini roundabout at the intersection, or other viable alternatives. Any future design must consider accommodations for CP trail needs, truck access along Dewey Hill, and other adjacent business needs as necessary. TRANSIT STOP DESIGN & ACCESS Continue coordination with Metro Transit on evaluating transit stop conditions, and pursue partnership opportunities for stop improvements with private property owners, particularly during (re)development. During future design and reconstruction of either the CP Trail, or public roads, identify stop locations that can be improved as part of the project. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 61 IMPLEMENTATION PLANIMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Implementing desired change in a place like the Cahill district is more than a simple to do list. There are different tiers of action, and a variety of tools to inform each tier. The purpose of this chapter is to lay out resources for each of the primary approaches. As change likely will be incremental and need to respond to both unanticipated opportunities and rapid change, this approach must be flexible. At the same time, it cannot compromise too much on the underlying goals and principles that form the common understanding shaping the plan. Going back to the original framing of this plan, this means having a strong framework to implement goals while also providing more general guidelines to allow for the pursuit of aspirations when an opportunity to do something unique emerges. In this plan, the implementation matrix (described below) outlines the way goals can be implemented. Regarding aspirations, they are provided as more inspirational concepts. The path forward with aspirations can include (but not be limited to): • Projects that involve public participation or another mission- driven partnership • Developers or property owners with a vision for an innovative approach to development • Proposals where additional approvals are needed that may incentivize exceptional approaches IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX The implementation steps below are based on this being a city-led plan. The City of Edina has tools and resources to set policy, build and maintain infrastructure, implement programs and initiatives, communicate strategic directions, and partner with other public and private entities and jurisdictions. Priorities for the Cahill district will necessarily need to be evaluated against other city goals and activities. As such, the timelines associated with them are estimated. Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years POTENTIAL SHORT TERM ACTIONS The implementation matrix provides an extensive list of possible actions. Not all of these will be near-term priorities, and many may depend on either market-driven opportunities or future prioritization of resources. However, based on an initial assessment of feasibility and priority, the following were identified as potential short term actions. • Ensure land use policy and regulatory consistency between the district plan and city policy and regulatory documents • Maximize value of planned regional trail connectivity for the district and the city. • Support improvements in Pedestrian Oriented Activity Areas, which include pedestrian scale design and enhanced open space. • Explore opportunities for wayfinding, signage, and branding for the district, particularly via gateway enhancements. • Scale up wastewater utility capacity improvements consistent with the City’s 2019 sewer capacity study for the district. • Promote improved branding and identity for area, including marketing and recruiting efforts. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 62 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS LAND USE Ensure land use policy and regulatory consistency between the district plan and city policy and regulatory documents • Update comprehensive plan to reflect new future land use guidance for portions of district • Review zoning code to ensure consistency with new land use guidance, and make changes as needed Planning Division Short term Plan and policy consistency City Council actions Apply advisory guidance related to development review, as outlined in the plan, with a focus on pedestrian oriented districts • Review development proposals against recommendations for an enhanced public realm, including semi-public areas • Consider development performance metrics when evaluating the merits of a proposed project Planning Division Ongoing Presence of enhanced development HOUSING Ensure any new housing development is in alignment with community goals and system capacities: • Evaluate potential for new housing in designated mixed-use areas, considering factors of contribution to city’s housing options and management of impacts on public systems and infrastructure • When developing housing in the area, encourage adjacency to other residential, development of shared public amenity spaces, and non- motorized connectivity Planning Division in coordination with Edina Public School District Mid term New housing developments and units Enhanced public spaces near residential/mixed use COMMUNITY FACILITIES Where opportunities present themselves, explore options for community- serving uses in the district for education, culture, shopping, recreation, and other purposes. • Explore opportunities for public-private partnerships around community- serving uses in coordination with developers • Consider and address impacts on community serving uses as part of development review process, including public schools Planning Commission Ongoing New or enhanced community-serving uses in district IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 63 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS TRANSPORTATION Maximize value of planned regional trail connectivity for the district and the city. • Consistent with the recommendations here, coordinate regarding completion of the CP Rail Trail through district, particularly along Bush Lake (from 74th to Edina Industrial) • Add any needed connectivity or wayfinding between the regional trail and the local bike and pedestrian network Transportation Division in coordination with Three Rivers Park District Short term Project completion Trail linkages Develop the Cahill Connector enhanced connectivity and placemaking network to define and enhance the area. • Develop streetscape enhancements and an off-road multi-use trail along: • Cahill Rd (70th St to Dewey Hill Rd) • Dewey Rd (Cahill Rd to Bush Lake Rd) • Bush Lake Rd (Dewey Hill Rd to 74th St) • 74th St (Bush Lake Rd to Ohms Ln) • Ohms Ln (72nd St to 74th St) • Metro Blvd (72nd St/Nine Mike Creek Trail Connector to 70th St) • Develop streetscape enhancements and consider upgrade to a multimodal trail along: • Cahill Rd (Dewey Hill Rd to Edina Industrial Blvd) Engineering Mid term Lineal feet of new trail and presence of enhanced streetscape Improve transit service experience and transit user experience throughout the district: • Make upgrades to transit stops and pedestrian connections to meet Metro Transit guidelines • Communicate regularly with Metro Transit regarding service expectations and recommendations for improvements to the district, corresponding with growth Metro Transit, in coordination with City Mid term Service level improvements Make improvements to Dewey/Cahill intersections to address traffic safety, multimodal accessibility, and gateway considerations: • Commission intersection study to consider options such as roundabout as well as improved sidewalks and pedestrian crossings. Engineering Mid term Updated intersection configuration or gateway treatments Support ongoing safe rail crossing management within the district. • Maintain existing at-grade rail crossing at Dewey Hill Rd • Support upgrades to safety of the rail corridor and/or crossing as needed based on current safety standards Engineering Mid/long term Maintained safety of crossing IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 64 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS TRANSPORTATION Encourage placement of shared mobility enhancements throughout district, including car, ride, bike, and scooter sharing, consistent with city policies and procedures. • Work with developers who want to incorporate one or more of these options within their existing or new development • Explore options with potential vendors of sharing services that may want to locate in the district Planning Division Mid/long term Presence of mobility options within the district Develop new roadway connections to close gaps in the roadway network and enhance connectivity, circulation, and separation of modes. • Connection between Ohms Lane and Bush Lake Road • Connection between 73rd St and Bush Lake Road Engineering Mid/long term Gaps filled in roadway network via new connections Incorporate traffic safety and traffic calming improvements where appropriate as roadways are upgraded. • Explore options including lane width reductions, crossing width reductions, enhanced pedestrian crossings, signalization where warranted, and enhanced streetscape Engineering Mid/long term Miles of enhanced roadway Encourage routing of freight traffic on routes identified in this plan, to help separate trucks from non-motorized uses when feasible. • Maintain existing MSA route as open for trucks • Encourage trucks, via signage and design, to be directed to routes including Bush Lake Rd, Dewey Hill Rd, 73rd St, and 76th St Engineering Mid/long term Safe and connected network HEALTH When developing public spaces and infrastructure improvements, work towards developing safe and appealing connections that promote healthy active lifestyles for residents and workers • Support inclusion of elements in the public realm that make physical activity safe, accessible, and rewarding Engineering and Community Health Commission Long term Increased physical activity and social interactions in district Consider role of regional trail connections through district in building out large network of active living facilities citywide • Support development of educational materials such as maps, website content, and others to educate people on current and planned trail connections and other active living resources Community Health Commission Long term Increased walking/biking accessibility to destinations citywide and across region IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 65 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS PARKS, OPEN SPACE, AND PUBLIC REALM Support improvements in Pedestrian Oriented Activity Areas, which include pedestrian scale design and enhanced open space. • Focus improvement on the Business Node, Neighborhood Node, and Neighborhood Mixed Use Subdistrict • Explore other opportunities, including major office retrofit or redevelopment Planning Commission Short/mid term Enhanced development and public realm Explore opportunities for wayfinding, signage, and branding for the district, particularly via gateway enhancements. • Consider development of a wayfinding, signage, and branding plan for the district, focusing on gateway areas • Consider specific focus on enhancing the gateway locations at: • Cahill Rd at Dewey Hill Blvd • Metro Blvd at 70th St • Edina Industrial Blvd at Hwy 100 Interchange • Bush Lake Rd at Edina Industrial Blvd City of Edi Short/mid term Wayfinding, signage, and/or branding enhancements for the district For future destination uses, encourage a parking management plan and/or coordination with adjacent property owners. • Consider district parking and shared parking arrangements with any major new developments generating significant traffic, and/or with uses that could share parking • Encourage less reliance on surface parking, including reduction of underutilized parking lots Planning Division Ongoing More efficient use of parking via shared and district solutions Work with the watershed on potential partnerships on enhanced stormwater features for major new development • Explore options in Pedestrian Oriented Activity areas and other areas with enhanced development potential, and/or major stormwater management needs Engineering Ongoing Partnerships with enhanced stormwater management in district IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 66 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS PUBLIC UTILITIES Scale up wastewater utility capacity improvements consistent with the city’s 2019 sewer capacity study for the district. • Expand sewer capacity consistent with plan aligns with Scenario 4: “Industrial-to-residential change along the edges of the district and more intense industrial and commercial uses in the core Engineering Short term Capacity to accommodate planned development Maintain water supply and quality to meet forecasted demand. • Implement planned system improvements and upgrades consistent with comprehensive plan and other guiding documents Engineering Short term Capacity to accommodate planned development Support surface water and other environmental quality improvements. • Coordinate with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District regarding their plans • Encourage best practices for managing runoff and stream buffering with development Engineering Mid term Improved water quality in district and downstream Encourage development of enhanced stormwater management that meets multiple goals. • Consider conducting a districts stormwater study for the district to identify scale, type, placement, and cost of potential improvements • Work with developers to explore partnerships around enhanced stormwater management as part of overall improved multi-function public realm Engineering and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Mid term Mitigate stormwater management deficiencies and flood risks As needed, support continued and enhanced presence of smart cities technology needed to serve business evolution. • Support private sector innovation in implementing technological solutions, including potential pilot efforts Engineering Mid term Presence of smart technology in the district IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 67 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENT Support the development of infrastructure supporting electrification and decarbonization • Encourage installation of EV charging stations throughout district at key locations accessible to visitors, employees, and other users • Encourage developers to pursue green building standards and practices that reduce carbon footprint Sustainability, Energy and Environment Commission Mid/long term Presence of expanded EV charging stations or other green enhancements Explore possibilities for district systems at district-wide or sub-district scale, including water, sewer, energy, parking, open space, etc. • Support feasibility analyses and/or proposals for district improvements, such as green energy • Explore partnerships with private property owners or other entities to seek resources to explore district solutions Sustainability, Energy and Environment Commission Mid/long term Feasibility analysis and potentially implementation of district systems Encourage privately initiated sustainability pilots that seek new and/or innovative approaches to advancing sustainability. • Explore supporting study, resource identification, and/or implementation of sustainability improvements to buildings, sites, and portions of the public realm Sustainability Mid/long term Sustainability pilots in the district HERITAGE PRESERVATION Research and document history of Cahill industrial area as part of City’s historical record • Develop a summary of the district history to include in city records Heritage Preservation Commission Long term Documented history of area Where appropriate, evaluate development applications and public realm improvement plans for opportunity to tell the history and significance of this area • Explore opportunities to incorporate historical interpretation and educational elements in development and public realm projects Heritage Preservation Commission Long term Interpretive signage or other treatment of the area IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 68 IMPLEMENTATION PLANGOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STEPS LEAD TIMING POTENTIAL METRICS ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS Coordinate with Edina Innovation Lab to support entrepreneurship and business startups in the district, as well as supporting existing ones. • Support outreach to current and potential tenants for the district, including sharing information on available resources for business development and expansion • Encourage connections between businesses and potential vacant locations in the district • Look for opportunities to connect with current businesses regarding ways for them to stay and thrive in this location. Economic Development Ongoing New and/or expanded businesses in the district Promote improved branding and identity for area, including marketing and recruiting efforts. • Consider developing a branding and identity plan for the district, including marketing materials • Consider retail or other tenant recruiting efforts, and/or identify what may be obstacles to firms locating here Economic Development Short/mid term Enhanced branding and marketing for district ARTS AND CULTURE Recognize, enhance, and expand upon public art in the district. • Initiate an inventory of legacy public art installations in the district • Consider both renovation of existing pieces and additional new art based on opportunity areas Arts and Culture Commission Long term Public art inventory; plan for additional installations HUMAN RIGHTS Support the development of a district that is safe, welcoming, and accessible to people of all identities, ages, and abilities • Ensure Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and other accessibility standards are considered in the context of all improvements to public spaces and corridors Human Rights and Relations Commission Long term ADA accessible standards maintained throughout district IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Short term = 1-2 years; Mid-term = 3-5 years; Long term = 5+ years Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 69 IMPLEMENTATION PLANDECARBONIZATION AND ELECTRIFICATION Building decarbonization, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and decreasing emissions, is increasing a priority. Expansion of EV charging infrastructure continues to be an in-demand feature for development. Both state and federal administrations have recently stepped up both with ambitious goals and unprecedented resources now available for implementation. IMPLICATION: Resources and support for green buildings and green energy in the Cahill district. DIGITAL TRACKING AND MODELING There are increasing and rapidly evolving applications for internet connected technology in planning for areas. One example includes smart cities applications that track things like air quality, lighting, waste management, and water flows so they can be efficiently modeled and provide real- time information. Virtual and extended reality opportunities are evolving as well. IMPLICATION: Explore potential pilot applications, especially in areas with low levels of natural surveillance. EVOLVING AND GROWING DEMAND FOR STREET EDGES There is growing demand for uses and activities in the curb space between street and property. Competing and complementary uses include room for outdoor shopping and dining, delivery services, shared mobility, and micro mobility (e-bikes, bikes, scooters). Exploration of how space is allocated in the right-of-way and how to prioritize modes and demands with the space. IMPLICATION: Roadway improvements should consider multiple space demands. UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE OF GREEN SPACES There is now increased understanding of how amenity-rich and multi-function public spaces contribute, from improved mental health to broader economic recovery. Expanded understanding of nature-based solutions to climate change resilience and flooding. Particularly in cities, understanding of how this can also contribute to vibrant public spaces that are attractive for workers and increase property value. IMPLICATION: Multiple reasons and needs that support investment in green infrastructure. A sustainable and green district with restorative environmental practices that support Edina’s climate resiliency goals through both the public realm and private investment, setting a higher standard for how office/industrial districts can function. ASPIRATION: RESILIENT AND CONNECTED SYSTEMS Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 70 IMPLEMENTATION PLANFUTURE OF OFFICE: WORKING ANYWHERE Post-pandemic, the expectation now is that working full-time in the office as a standard model is obsolete. Over half the workforce has the ability to work remote at least part time, and people are making choices based on convenience, amenity, and lifestyle flexibility. This is even more present in younger generations, particularly Gen Z “digital natives.” Flexibility will be needed to accommodate different working patterns. IMPLICATION: Work spaces must be attractive and convenient, with additional amenities. Office and parking space footprints may shrink. DESIGNING FOR CONTINUOUS CHANGE With only half of pre-pandemic office supply now being occupied, the market is in the midst of a disruptive time for how space is used, and a focus on how to design for continuous changes. This may include adaptively reusing obsolete buildings or designing new ones with multiple uses or flexibility to change between them. This will have implications for tax capacity and use mix, as the balance of how space is used shifts. IMPLICATION: Allow for flexibility of the use of space, and mixing of different uses, particularly with competitive markets in mind FUTURE OF INDUSTRY: OLD IS NEW AGAIN While the tech industry is experiencing an adjustment, there is a resurgence in focus on domestic manufacturing, as some industries are seeking to restore production and simplify logistics. Likewise, surges in demand for both deliveries and data mean urban industrial locations are attractive for small-scale, strategically located distribution and data hubs, with smaller, but more numerous, trucks than prior industrial areas. IMPLICATION: Strong demand possible for industrial park areas with value added uses. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND CREATOR ECONOMY The last couple of years in particular have seen a spike in the formation of new businesses, particularly entrepreneurial efforts that can operate anywhere. Likewise, the creator economy is an innovative and disruptive force. Content creation in the digital space has generated new value, and many questions. High speed internet is a must, but how this translates into bricks and mortar operations is still in development. IMPLICATION: Support new entrepreneurs as they seek to evolve their businesses past the startup phase and become more established. ASPIRATION: REGIONAL ECONOMIC VALUE An innovative business district that helps redefine the future of work through enhanced, high amenity workspaces and forward-thinking businesses that explore new frontiers in their field, drawing on the top talent in the region and reflecting the city’s commitment to continuous learning and progress. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 71 IMPLEMENTATION PLANASPIRATION: COMMUNITY SERVING AND BUILDING A lively, vibrant mixed-use district that is an attractive destination for both local residents and areas visitors, with retail and services, unique living options, and leisure and entertainment opportunities that transform this into a niche urban community. NICHE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR LIVING AND WORKING With the high degree of mobility and options experienced by households, leading areas with the opportunity and resources to create niche neighborhood concepts, with hyper-local and custom amenities that provide unique and convenient spaces. While preferences are diverse, households with the highest degree of choice predominantly prefer amenity-rich suburbs. IMPLICATION: Create mixed use choice neighborhood concepts specific to preferences of current and future workers and residents. MORE EMPHASIS ON HEALTHY AND GREEN LIVING People are also making intentional decisions about promoting health and sustainability through their lifestyles. There has been a growing trend, particularly post pandemic, for people who want to demonstrate their values and promote wellness through how they shop, live, work, and play. The presence of live-work options can extend the hours of activity in the area beyond 8-5. IMPLICATION: Health-promoting and green amenities in buildings and public realm are value added component NEW RHYTHMS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITY Mirroring flexibility in the work week, the typical patterns of activity in neighborhoods and business district have been changed, perhaps permanently. With more people working at home and choosing off-peak hours for travel, uses and activities are more mixed and need flexibility to meet today’s lifestyle choices, including digital nomads. IMPLICATION: Designing a district that provides a mix of convenient, compatible options for living and working, especially for those with flexible scheduling. CHANGING PEOPLE, CHANGING HOMES As the population continues to both diversify and age, the composition of housing options within a community needs to change as well. Market-driven responses point to a need for more multifamily, mixed use, and accessory options – as well as just a general increase in the supply to meet demand. At the community level, this means rebalancing and adding to the overall housing mix. It can also mean new market niches, like flexible live-work options. IMPLICATION: Housing options that provide lifecycle housing choices for people in Edina. Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 72 IMPLEMENTATION PLANMEASURING PROGRESS APPROACH While the goals and implementation steps earlier focus on outcomes via public sector actions, the full potential of the area will only be realized via private and semi-private efforts. This many include development proposals, business investments and expansions, potential public/private partnerships, an other means by which great ideas are surfaced and common ground is discovered. As a result, the means to measure progress focuses less on specific goals and more on achieving a range of performance standards. The table to the right associates them with both the overall plan principles and series of topical areas of intervention where there’s room for the public sector to be involved. During the planning process, there was a robust discussion of the possibility of metering limited capacity in the district based on the ability of potential projects to meet a certain standard. While this process stopped short of defining a precise formula, this section is intended as a resource for furthering this conversation. HOW DOES EDINA LEAD? There are three key leadership areas where the City can set the stage and tone for what’s next: CAPACITY: Due to critical system constraints, public investment needed, most notably on sewer capacity, but also in areas such as schools. Otherwise, growth potential will be significantly limited. PARTNERSHIP: Changing the land use type, intensity, and character of this area will require a significant effort, and potentially additional resources. Public partnership and leadership can both enable and elevate exceptional development futures. FLEXIBILITY: While this plan provides significant guidance, the nature of new and innovative concepts is that they may push against the limits of what is expected. While core principles and goals should likely be maintained, the City’s openness to unexpected but welcome ideas has the potential to open new frontiers. The City already has established procedures for exploring flexibility in standards, while still aligning with adopted policy, via its development review process. PRINCIPLES AREAS OF INTERVENTION POTENTIAL METRICS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS RESILIENT AND CONNECTED SYSTEMS Climate resilience Flood reduction Stormwater management Green infrastructure Environmental cleanup Environmental systems Green energy Green building standards District systems System capacity and expansion Managed impact on public services and systems Building energy usage and efficiency Carbon footprint reduction Enhanced stormwater/ surface water management New green space, tree coverage, natural areas, streetscaping, etc. Impervious surface coverage reduction Building/area green certification and green building practices Alternative transportation options for residents/workers Presence/use of district systems (e.g., water, energy, parking, etc.) Decreased reliance on single occupancy vehicles Improved environmental quality (e.g., water, soil, air, etc.) Green businesses – both products and operations Reputation as a green and sustainable district REGIONAL ECONOMIC VALUE Land use pattern Built form Market responsiveness Development feasibility Economic constraints Public and private partnerships Industrial district value Existing business value Small business support Fiscal and economic impacts Local tax base expansion, diversification Total retail/office/industrial sf and jobs by industry Housing unit/household growth Worker wages/salaries, company sales/revenue Higher jobs/sf density for businesses Locally based workers, including live/work Additional community-serving businesses New business startups and entrepreneurs Presence of destination businesses and headquarters Transit supportive development scale and density near transit routes Industrial/office space vacancy rates and average rents Value of building permits issued (both new and renovation/expansion) Decrease in number of buildings that are below average condition Decreased in sites with relatively low value buildings Emerging best practices about district innovation COMMUNITY SERVING AND BUILDING Placemaking Public realm and open space Space programming and activation Urban design and character Residential mix Walkability and connectivity Public and traffic safety Active living Community-focused uses Scale and transitions Cultural/historical elements Mix of housing units, providing lifecycle housing options Expanded bike and pedestrian facilities and amenities Improved ped/bike walkability/bikeability conditions and volumes Community gathering places, destinations, and events Frequency and duration of public transit service and ridership Presence of public art or gateway features in public realm Improved vehicle traffic safety and operations, reduced speeds/crashes Additional connections to surrounding areas and networks Improved and well-managed edges with surrounding areas Access to healthy foods, health care, and recreational opportunities Mitigation of noise, dust, truck traffic, and other impacts Educational and/or cultural components in public spaces Satisfaction survey results from residents/ businesses Improved character, design, and identity Cahill District Plan DRAFT // 5-11-2023 Spring 2023 73 IMPLEMENTATION PLANIMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS MANAGING IMPACTS As identified earlier, system capacity and constraints are an important consideration. The underlying structure of Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, as well as various other policy and regulatory documents, is based on ensuring public decision making and investment keep pace with expected growth and change. The challenge of pacing public costs with development is that public investments are often not incremental, so they cannot be easily tracked parallel to marginal impacts of new development. However, that does not mean that cumulative impacts shouldn’t be considered during public decision making. A future area of study could be investigating a more robust strategy for accounting for future impacts of redevelopment. One potential tool is an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process. An AUAR is a Minnesota state tool to evaluate environmental impacts of multi-phase development across a study area. If a future larger-scale redevelopment project is proposed, an AUAR may be an effective way to meet environmental review requirements. PLAN EVOLUTION While this plan is intended as a long-term strategy for the district, changes and uncertainties mean that revisiting this (and other small area plans) every 5-10 years helps them remain relevant and updated. While the core principles of this plan are established as a means to maintain consistency across time, some aspects may need to change. It happens that the next significant opportunity to revisit this plan will be during the City’s comprehensive plan update, starting within a few years. As it is expected this plan will be incorporated directly into the citywide comprehensive plan, as have other small area and district plans, the City will need to affirm the plan’s direction and consistency with the citywide planning framework. When it comes to a plan update, hopefully there is no need for major reworking of all elements. However, some key questions can be identified to guide this path of inquiry, and inform if a plan amendment is needed. These questions may include, but not be limited to, the change factors to the right While a review of these factors can be a helpful exercise, it doesn’t necessarily require that the plan be amended. However, flexibility in approach can ensure that the city continues progress toward its goals and aspirations for the community, while being effective stewards of public resources. CHANGE FACTORS MARKET TRENDS: What has changed since plan initiations, particularly in terms of real estate and development value and opportunities? How does this impact development feasibility? DEVELOPMENT COMPARABLES: What does development in other districts look like, and how does this impact the competitive landscape to attract investment? What about development inquiries or applications that Edina has received? Does the plan provide direction in line with these possibilities? PROPERTY AND BUSINESS OWNERSHIP: Have there been any major changes in ownership in the district that may impact potential outcomes, such as the sale and potential expansion or downsizing of a business? Does this create or remove any opportunities? PERFORMANCE OF NEW DEVELOPMENT: When development happens, is the intended outcome in line with expectations, or does the city determine that some adjustment to direction is needed? SYSTEM CAPACITY ASSESSMENT: Are impacts on near- or at-capacity systems being managed and mitigated effectively? Do there need to be adjustments so as not to unduly burden these systems, including identifying additional investment needed? Proposed changes to Comprehensive Plan text are noted in red and begin on page 3-25. Comment boxes to be removed upon final adoption of the amendment. 3-1 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter Highlights • The land use vision for the City of Edina will guide the future distribution, mix, and intensity of uses to optimize the current and future vitality and livability of the community. • The biggest land use changes in the city will be in targeted areas of change, including those identified through the small area planning processes. These places are potential opportunities for shifts in uses and intensities, supporting larger community goals. • While much of the city’s land area will not be targeted for change, it will not remain static or frozen in time. Continued investments in these areas are needed to maintain and update aging buildings and infrastructure, to meet the needs of the people and businesses that use them. • Overall community character and livability are greatly valued in Edina. There will be a continual need to balance protecting what is valued and responding to needed and ongoing changes. • Land use bears a close and vital relationship to public infrastructure, utilities, and services. The City will need to plan and invest responsibly in these systems – both to maintain existing facilities and to provide new ones in response to changing and expanding needs. This is addressed in more depth in other chapters. • Sustainability is an important value throughout this plan. In terms of land use, it has implications from the small scale (e.g. how buildings are constructed and maintained) to citywide (e.g. responsible use of resources, preparing a community to respond to climate change). This is addressed in more depth in other chapters. Introduction The land use element of the comprehensive plan provides not only guidance for land use and development within the city, but some of the organizing principles for the city itself. The planned and orderly development of land reflects community values and priorities, in terms of the opportunities it creates for where people can live, work, and congregate within city limits. It establishes the planned scale and intensity of neighborhoods and reflects the ability of the community overall to accommodate growth and change. It also relates to existing and planned infrastructure – including roadways, trails, transit systems, water and wastewater, parks, and others. Since a plan to accommodate growth is one of the central functions of this comprehensive plan, this land use element will focus primarily on how this can be accomplished in a way that is sustainable and consistent with overall community goals. Definitions Design Guidelines provide guidance for the character, scale, and built form of development. Land Use is the purpose for which land cover is committed, such as residential, industrial, or open space. Mixed Use is a land use category that includes two or more different land uses, arranged either horizontally on the same site, or vertically in the same building. Zoning is a technique used in land use planning to divide an area into a series of zones with defined characteristics, which are regulated through city ordinance. Under Minnesota state statute, zoning must be consistent with a city’s adopted comprehensive plan. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-2 To be a useful day-to-day decision-making guide, the land use plan must be adaptable to unanticipated changes and be specific to current conditions and issues in the city. To balance these goals, it will be necessary to closely monitor and update the land use plan on a regular basis. It is widely recognized that the appearance and compatibility of a land use with its surroundings frequently are as important as the use itself. Community design guidelines are defined by this plan to guide the built and natural form of the city to foster and sustain livability and sense of place. Where the land use plan addresses specific areas and combinations of land uses, community design addresses the way these land uses are sited and designed. The community design component of this chapter looks at existing and planned land uses from the perspective of their current natural, designed, or built character. It suggests design strategies for protecting or enhancing this character or allowing for appropriate transitions. Forecasted Growth Addressing and accommodating forecasted growth in the City of Edina, should it occur, is a core function of the comprehensive plan. As Edina is already fully developed, this land use plan demonstrates how expected increases in population, households, and jobs can be accommodated through redevelopment and infill within designated change areas. Table 3.1 and Figure 3.1 show past patterns and future projections of growth in Edina by the Metropolitan Council. Population and household growth rates in Edina were relatively steady between 1970 and 2010, though they have increased since then. Employment, after surging in earlier years, has followed a similar pattern. The ratio of jobs to population has remained high, reflecting the role of portions of Edina as a regional employment center. The overall rate of change has increased since 2010, due to many new multifamily residential, commercial, and mixed-use projects. The forecasts included in this chapter were developed by the Metropolitan Council, indicating the city’s expected share of market-driven growth in the region, should such growth occur. These forecasts are modified versions of those in Edina’s original 2015 System Statement, adjusting for higher-than-expected growth rates in Edina over the past few years. Metropolitan Council forecasts at the local and regional level are adjusted as needed, to reflect new information and market changes. The current forecasts reflect mutual agreement between the Metropolitan Council and Edina regarding implications of market- driven growth trends. The forecasts are derived from local and regional factors, including past housing and job trends and the city’s expected share of projected regional growth. Between 2020 and 2040, the regional population is expected to increase by 15%, households by 17%, and jobs by 12%. If regional forecasts are realized, Edina’s population is projected to increase by 16% or 8,600, households by 24% or 5,800, and jobs by 8% or 4,300. The faster rates of population and household growth relative to employment reflect the anticipated transition of primarily commercial areas into residential-commercial mixed-use districts. These forecasts are based on several assumptions, including overall economic climate, site availability, and market conditions. The actual counts may be lower or higher than these estimates. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-3 Table 3.1: Population, Household, and Employment Projections 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Population 44,046 46,073 46,070 47,425 47,941 51,804 55,000 60,000 63,600 Households 13,005 17,961 19,860 20,996 20,672 22,309 24,000 27,700 29,800 Employment 20,240 36,061 44,534 52,991 47,457 52,330 51,800 54,000 56,100 Source: Metropolitan Council estimates and revised Thrive MSP 2040 forecasts, as of January 2019 Source: Metropolitan Council estimates and revised Thrive MSP 2040 forecasts, as of January 2019 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Figure 3.1: Edina Population, Household, and Employment Trends Population Households Employment Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-4 Community Designation Community designation is a typology used by the Metropolitan Council to categorize cities by geography and development patterns. Edina is designated as an Urban community in the Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 plan. Figure 3.2 shows the extent of this designation for the city, as well as that of surrounding communities. These designations are largely a function of when and how communities were developed. The Metropolitan Council uses these designations to guide regional growth and development, establish land use expectations including overall development densities and patterns, and outline the respective roles of the Council and individual communities, along with strategies for planning for forecasted growth. This designation as an Urban community has implications for how Edina plans for growth, density, and change. This includes a particular focus on guiding development around existing and planned transit. Metropolitan Council Guidance In Thrive MSP 2040, the Metropolitan Council states: “Urban communities experienced rapid development during the post-World War II era, and exhibit the transition toward the development stage dominated by the influence of the automobile. Urban communities are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at average densities of at least 10 units per acre for new development and redevelopment. In addition, Urban communities are expected to target opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit investments at densities and in a manner articulated in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan.” Edina: A Community of Learning. Edina has a prized education system of high-quality public schools. The Land Use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the importance of extending the benefits of education to the entire community. The development review process is often the place where the public comes most into contact with land use guidance at the city level. Educational elements to help inform the development review process can both build public knowledge and improve process outcomes. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-5 Figure 3.2: Community Designation (Source: Metropolitan Council Thrive MSP 2040) Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-6 Trends and Challenges Strategic redevelopment and reinvestment. Growth of population and jobs helps keep Edina a vibrant, healthy, and attractive place to live and work. However, as a fully developed city, Edina will accommodate growth via the reuse of existing properties. Future development plans must balance market feasibility and responsiveness with overall perceived community benefits. Plans for land use changes should be strategic, particularly in regard to improving access to transportation networks and providing benefits to the community. Preserving existing residential character. High land prices and scarcity of available land within the city have resulted in a sharp increase in single-family home redevelopment. There has been considerable public discussion about the appropriate massing, height, proportions, and the architectural elements of rebuilt homes in established neighborhoods. Those changes have been reflected in changes in city ordinances since 2010. How the city can balance the desire of some residents for larger homes with state-of-the-art features and developers seeking to offer housing units that appeal to today’s market with the interests of neighbors who object to the size and scale of some new construction is an ongoing concern of the community and the Council. Adding walkability and bikeability. Much of Edina was developed during post-WWII decades when auto-oriented suburbs did not prioritize accommodating pedestrians and bicycles. A transportation network that allows for additional transit and non-motorized travel options increases the movement capacity of the existing public right-of-way and capitalizes on resident needs for more active lifestyles. Developing a complete non-motorized transportation network will take time and effort and should fit into a well-planned, incremental transportation network. Changing needs of commercial and industrial uses. The useful life of commercial and industrial buildings tends to be significantly shorter than residential buildings, and many of Edina’s commercial and industrial buildings are aging and potentially obsolete, at least based on their originally intended use. These buildings will need to be renovated, repurposed, or replaced to reflect current and future needs, including creating a much different model for retail than in the past. Increased interest in mixed-use/live- work scenarios also requires evaluation. Vision Edina surveyed respondents on the question of the residential development mix in the city and the need for options to live near where people work. Around 37% expressed a stronger preference for mixed use and diverse residential options, as opposed to a single-family home focus. Around 52% had a stronger preference for “live and work local” options, in contrast to reliance on commuting elsewhere. Demographic changes. A dominant trend, both locally and nationally, is the overall aging of the population. This has a host of implications for land use, including changes in the type of housing needed, goods and services demanded, and reliance on non-auto transportation options. Additionally, the Vision Edina community engagement process found that both younger (those under 30) and older (those over 60) participants were equally in support of more housing options, in contrast to a single-family housing focus. Expanding transportation options. In addition to walkability and bikeability at the neighborhood level, there is increased interest in providing access to multiple modes of transportation. This has implications for land use, in terms of locating appropriate housing units and jobs within safe and comfortable walking and bicycling distances of transit stops. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-7 Existing Land Use and Conditions Overview The existing land uses in the City of Edina provide a view into the character of the community, as well as the starting place for planning future growth and change. A substantial majority of the land area is expected to continue in its current use through 2040, with growth focused in specific defined areas discussed later in the chapter. This section covers current land use and conditions. This includes the existing land use map and acreages, property value (market value and land/value ratio), building age and condition, and definitions of existing land use categories. Land Use Map Figure 3.3 shows the existing land uses in the City of Edina, and Table 3.2 shows the percentage of existing land use by category as of 2016, compared with 2005 data from the previous comprehensive plan. Comparing the two years shows a decline in commercial, industrial, and institutional, and a rise in mixed use, parks, and multifamily housing. Over half of the land in the city (53%) is single family detached residential, with the next largest proportion taken by parks (10%). Golf courses are called out as a separate category, so the percentage of city land in the park system is lower than the stated percentage of open space in the city. Commercial, industrial, and higher density residential uses are clustered in specific areas, typically in defined nodes and districts, as well as along some major corridors. Consistent with the overall regional approach to mapping land use, existing land use calculations in this plan do not distinguish between local roads and adjacent uses. This is different than the parcel-based approach for future land use shown later in the chapter. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-8 Table 3.2: Existing Land Use, 2005-2016 (Total Acres) Use 2005 Acres 2016 Acres Percent Total Acres (2016) 2005-2016 Change 2005-2016 Percent Change Single Family Detached 5,434 5,419 53% -15 -0.3% Park, Recreational or Preserve 922 972 10% 50 5.4% Golf Course 693 666 7% -27 -3.9% Institutional 468 444 4% -24 -5.1% Major Highway 401 442 4% 41 10.2% Multifamily 420 433 4% 13 3.1% Office 407 395 4% -12 -2.9% Retail and Other Commercial 384 313 3% -71 -18.5% Industrial and Utility 337 299 3% -38 -11.3% Single Family Attached 261 272 3% 11 4.2% Open Water 261 269 3% 8 3.1% Undeveloped Land 211 216 2% 5 2.4% Mixed-use Commercial & Other 51 1% 25 Mixed-use Industrial 17 0% 17 Mixed-use Residential 17 0% 17 Mixed Use 2008* 26 -15 226.9%** TOTAL 10,225 10,225 100% Source: Metropolitan Council *The 2008 plan did not split up mixed use into multiple categories, so comparison is between combined totals of mixed use. **Change in total mixed use Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-9 Figure 3.3: Existing Land Use Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-10 Changes Since 2008 Plan Since the City of Edina is fully developed, changes in existing land use have been incremental based on redevelopment, with a shift towards more multifamily and mixed use within potential areas of change, as shown on Figure 3.11. In the interim since the adoption of the previous comprehensive plan in 2008, there also have been changes to the land use policy and regulatory guidance for the city. These changes include: • Comprehensive plan amendments to add more detailed guidance for land use density by future land use category. • Comprehensive plan amendments to provide development guidelines for planned unit development or other larger projects. • Zoning changes at the individual site level to support new development projects, particularly mixed use. Existing Land Use Categories Figure 3.3 illustrates the pattern of existing land use in Edina as of 2016. The categories on the map are described as follows: Single-Family Residential Single-Family Detached. Residential neighborhoods are the most extensive land use within the city in terms of total land area, of which single family detached housing is the largest component. Neighborhood character varies based on era of construction, scale of development, and landscape influences. Although there is significant variation, the most common residential type consists of post- WWII single-family homes on wooded lots along curvilinear streets. Multifamily Residential Single-Family Attached. This land use consists of residential units with common walls, where each unit has direct exterior access. In Edina the most common buildings of this type are townhouses and duplexes (two-family dwellings). Townhouses tend to be clustered close to highway or major road corridors, while duplexes are often found in narrow strips along major thoroughfares such as Vernon and France Avenues, and serve as a buffer for adjacent single-family neighborhood detached housing. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple-unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. Commercial Retail and Other Commercial. An important part of Edina’s identity is its status as a regional commercial and employment center. The Edina marketplace is dominated by high-end retail, medical, real estate, and banking services, making it a unique destination within the metro area. The city’s demographics, in terms of incomes, match this business market. Retail areas can be defined based on their market positions: regional, community, and neighborhood. Edina’s regional retail district is the Greater Southdale area. Community-level districts include 50th& France and Grandview, although they contain some regional destinations Neighborhood shopping districts, including the commercial nodes at Valley View and Wooddale and West 70th and Cahill, mainly serve surrounding neighborhoods with convenience shopping and services. Several other neighborhoods have small commercial nodes providing convenience goods and services. The larger concentrations of this land use are generally located toward the edges of the city, rather than in the center. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-11 Office. Long known as a retail center for the southwest metro area, Edina also contains office space in its four business and industrial areas, occupants of which include several large corporations, as covered in the Economic Competitiveness Chapter. This land use is concentrated along such major thoroughfares as the western sides of France Avenue and TH 100 and the northern side of West 66th Street. Mixed-use Mixed-use Residential. This land use consists of areas with a mix of uses including residential units and commercial. In its 2016 data, the Metropolitan Council recognizes around 17 acres of this land use in the city, primarily in the Southdale area. While a small percentage of overall uses, this has been growing. Mixed-use Industrial. This land use includes a mixture of industrial uses that may include office and retail but no residential units. The mixed-use industrial land use is found primarily in the Cahill industrial area west of TH 100 and along the south side of West 77th Street in the Pentagon Park area. Mixed-use Commercial and Other. This land use category contains nonresidential uses exclusively. There are around 51 acres of this designated use in Edina, primarily in the Southdale area and north of Highway 62 on the city’s western border. Other Land Uses Industrial and Utility. Industrial uses are concentrated near areas with historically lower land prices and multimodal transportation options. Currently, the two areas in the city that meet these qualifications are the Cahill area west of TH 100 and south of West 70th Street, the greater Pentagon Park area, and a smaller concentration along TH 169 as it borders Eden Prairie in the extreme southwest corner of the city. It is expected that lower intensity industrial uses in these areas may cause transition to other types of uses in the future. Institutional. Institutional land uses are located through the city. They are occupied by large public and private service providers such as public safety (police, fire), essential services (public works), county libraries, hospitals, and other medical care facilities. They also include schools, social, cultural, and educational establishments, and cemeteries. Parks and Recreation. Edina has an extensive public park system that serves the community and area residents. Parklands include a golf course; biking and walking trails; various forms of recreational and athletic facilities, playgrounds and playing fields; and natural open space. Lands devoted to parks and recreation constitute the second highest percentage of all land use acreages. Some of the land included as park and recreational is within the Minnehaha and Nine Mile Creek floodplains, as well as other floodplains and stormwater drainage areas. Golf Course. Edina has three major golf courses: Braemar Golf Course – a municipal facility – and the private country clubs of Interlachen Country Club and Edina Country Club. They constitute around 666 acres of the city’s land area. Major Highway. The city is bisected by two regional arteries, TH 62 and TH 100, trunk highways which divide the city into geographic quadrants. In addition, two more highways, I-494 and TH 169, border the city or pass near its boundaries. These limited access roads allow for convenient access to points outside the city or to destinations within the city for residents, workers, and visitors. The acreage listed for this land use does not include local roads. Undeveloped. Land categorized as “undeveloped” in the city contains protected and non-protected wetlands, steep slopes, and land not clearly used for any other categorized land use. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-12 Open Water. Nine Mile and Minnehaha Creeks provide a natural drainage system for the city’s land. Numerous lakes are both independent and linked to the creeks. Property Value Assessed property value is an important determinant of how market forces, property condition, and community context contribute to the perceived value of a property. This section is included to provide an overview of current conditions in Edina, as well as some implications. Figure 3.4 shows estimated market value per acre. Property values in Edina tend to be among the highest in the region, reflecting the desirable nature of the community. In Edina, the area with the most consistently high values per acre is the Country Club District, a designated historic district on the National Register of Historic Places. (See Chapter 13 Heritage Preservation for more information on designated historic resources.) Property values are more variable (though still fairly high) in the western neighborhoods. While high values may mean that property owners are able to keep their investments, they may also make it more challenging to maintain affordability. High land values in particular may make certain areas more attractive for redevelopment, particularly when the building value is relatively low in comparison. For areas where the value of the land is fairly high relative to the building value, it may be attractive to either renovate or expand the building, or to redevelop the site entirely. This is not always allowed under ordinance or encouraged by policy, although either may be modified by the City Council in response to changing conditions or opportunities. An example of this situation could be a location where land values may make it economically feasible to develop at a scale beyond what is allowed under city policy and regulation. Figure 3.5 shows the ratio of land value to total value for a property. A substantial amount of the land in Edina has land values that are more than half of the total value. This suggests that the underlying property is a very strong contributor to the value – which is consistent with much of what is known about Edina from other sources. In such circumstances, there may be market incentive to further invest in the property through expansion or redevelopment. These figures show potential change areas, which are guided for growth and redevelopment in accordance with small area plans and covered later in the chapter. Properties within these change areas with relatively high land-to-value ratios may be targets for redevelopment. One example of a potential change area, based on these maps, could be the Cahill industrial area. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-13 Figure 3.4: Market Value Per Acre Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-14 Figure 3.5: Land Value to Total Value Ratio Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-15 Building Age and Condition Building age and condition are contributing factors when determining future redevelopment potential. All other things being equal, older and poorer condition buildings may be more viable redevelopment opportunities than those that are newer and better condition. There are exceptions to this, particularly in the case of protected historic properties. Additionally, there may be opportunities to reinvest in the property, rather than to change use or scale. Figure 3.6 shows the age of the buildings in Edina. Starting as a largely rural farm community on the outskirts of the Twin Cities region in the early 1900’s, Edina evolved rapidly into a developing suburb, with its own commercial and employment centers. Growth spread outwards from the area closest to Minneapolis, with the full extent of the existing city limits mostly developed by the 1980’s. Land use patterns reflect planned growth areas, largely separated by use and intensity, though there have been more mixed-uses in recent years. It’s notable that there is also a sprinkling of newer housing in some of the oldest neighborhoods. This reflects new construction, either on infill sites or replacement of existing housing stock. Building permit data shows this has continued in recent years at a moderate pace. Figure 3.7 shows the condition of buildings in Edina. This is collected on a multi-year cycle by the City of Edina. Since not every building is surveyed every year, it may not be completely up-to-date for any given structure. Since it is based primarily on an external assessment of building appearance, it may not reflect the condition of interiors or building systems. Due to these limitations, additional investigation may be needed at the individual property level to more completely assess a building’s condition. For the most part, buildings in the city are in average-to-good condition, with just a few scattered exceptions. As with other patterns, the oldest and most historic areas stand out as exceptional. However, there are many well-maintained properties throughout the city. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-16 Figure 3.6: Building Age Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-17 Figure 3.7: Building Condition Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-18 Residential Density Since Edina is a fully developed community with no room to expand its boundaries, increased residential density may be needed to accommodate potential new growth within the city. Areas with concentrations of residential density are beneficial in various other ways, such as: • providing a customer and workforce base for commercial districts • supporting the viability of alternative transportation modes such as transit, car share, micro transit, and nonmotorized • generating activity and interactions that support community placemaking • more efficiently using existing infrastructure and public service capacity • protecting undeveloped areas in the region from encroaching outward on development • creating additional tax base to take some of the tax burden off single family housing. Denser areas may also generate higher traffic volumes, increase demands for public services, and create environmental consequences. One purpose of this plan is to anticipate those effects, and to plan for improvements and investments that reduce or mitigate such impacts. Potential impacts addressed in the comprehensive plan include, but are not limited to: • Multimodal transportation needs (Transportation Chapter) • Water supply, sanitary sewer, and stormwater system needs (Water Resources Chapter) • Parks and trails (Parks, Open Space, and Natural Resources Chapter) • Environmental impacts (Energy and Environment Chapter) • Community service and facility needs (Community Services and Facilities Chapter) • Economic development opportunities (Economic Competitiveness Chapter) Residential density in Edina is measured and regulated in terms of total dwelling units per acre, consistent with regional standards. What a building of a certain density will look like is not always intuitive. Due to variations in unit size, building layout, and site design, two buildings with the same number of units per acre can appear very different from one another in terms of height, bulk, and character. While it is useful to allocate growth in terms of the number of units that can be placed on a site, units per acre should not be the only measure used to determine whether a certain development is appropriate for a site or a neighborhood. Additionally, variations in unit size impact units per acre calculations. An example could be small units for senior housing or micro units that increase the number of dwelling units per acre. Figure 3.8 shows the distribution of housing unit density across the city, and Figure 3.9 shows population density. Since this was based on 2010 data, it does not show development that has been constructed and occupied since 2010. Housing and population densities follow similar patterns to overall land uses. Almost all the single-family areas of Edina average less than five units per gross acre, with higher densities in multifamily and mixed-use areas. The older neighborhoods along the eastern side of Edina are slightly higher density than other single-family neighborhoods, reflecting smaller lots and smaller buildings. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-19 Figure 3.8: Existing Housing Units per Acre Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-20 Figure 3.9: Population Per Square Mile Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-21 Table 3.3 summarizes Edina’s residential acreage by existing land use category. Single family detached housing covers the majority of residential acres in the city. Table 3.3: Residential Acres by Type (Total Acres) Land Use Acres Percent of Total Single Family Detached 5,419 88.2% Single Family Attached 272 4.4% Multifamily 433 7.1% Mixed-use Residential 17 0.3% Total 6,141 100% Source: Metropolitan Council Net residential density is used to determine how dense residential areas are within a community. For the purposes of utility planning, this is an indicator of whether a development pattern is compact enough to be efficiently served. For the purposes of transportation planning, it is an indicator of where development is dense enough to support alternative travel modes such as transit. Net residential density is determined by subtracting from total acres the undevelopable portions of residential land, including wetlands and water bodies, public parks and open space, major road right-of- way, and other areas protected from development by local ordinances. Since Edina is a fully developed community, undevelopable acres account for a fairly small percentage of residential parcels, since most of those areas have either been modified or converted to permanent open space. Table 3.4 shows net residential density in Edina. Table 3.4: Net Residential Density in 2016 Land Use Number of Units Acres Gross Residential Acres Undevelopable Net Residential Acres Net Density Units/Acre Single Family Attached 12,851 5,419 329 5,090 2.5 Single Family Detached 1,326 272 15 257 5.2 Multifamily 8,980 433 20 413 21.8 Mixed-use Residential 353 17 0 17 20.8 Total 23,510 6,141 364 5,777 4.1 Source: Metropolitan Council Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-22 Potential Change Areas The Comprehensive Plan functions as a long-range tool that anticipates where growth in populations, households, and jobs will be incorporated in the city. As a fully developed city, it is expected that most of the land in Edina will maintain its current land use, scale, and intensity. Where there are single-family home neighborhoods, they will remain single family home neighborhoods. Greater density may occur in areas other than single-family neighborhoods. Appropriate transitions will need to continue to be implemented for development in areas that abut neighborhoods with single-family homes. No area of the city is expected to be completely static. Due to the city’s aging building stock and changing needs of residents and businesses, continued investments will be required for rehabilitation, expansion, and replacement of existing structures. The numbers of residents in single-family neighborhoods and employees in commercial locations are expected to remain approximately the same. There are areas of the city that have some capacity to accommodate new growth in the form of housing units and job-generating uses. These are places where infrastructure capacity to support new growth is already relatively robust. The Greater Southdale District is the largest of these potential areas and will be expected to accommodate a sizeable percentage of citywide growth if that growth becomes reality. The City of Edina 2008 comprehensive plan identified “potential areas of change” as shown on Figure 3.10. These were places where change was most likely to occur. A major recommendation following up on this designation was to complete small area plans for “specific neighborhoods, districts, or potential areas of change in the community” to provide more specific guidance for these areas. Working with community-based stakeholder groups and through extensive public engagement, the City has undertaken and completed plans for the following areas. The study areas are shown on Figure 3.11, with the boundaries that were established for those respective plans. • GrandView Development Framework (2012) • Small Area Plan for the Wooddale-Valley View Neighborhood Node (2015) • Greater Southdale District Plan (2018) • Small Area Plan for the City of Edina’s 44th & France Neighborhood Node (2018) • Small Area Plan for the City of Edina’s 70th & Cahill Neighborhood Node (2018) • Small Area Plan for the City of Edina’s 50th & France District (2019) These City Council adopted small area plans are incorporated into the comprehensive plan by reference. Recommendations from the plans for land use guidance and other elements has been incorporated onto the future land use map and throughout the comprehensive plan. The Edina Big Ideas process identified three potential small areas for future consideration, including Lincoln/169/Eden Prairie, expanded 70th & Cahill, and Pentagon Park. The 2008 plan also showed a portion of North France Avenue, which may be potentially impacted by the future E Line Rapid Bus project. The City will continue to monitor these areas for growth potential. There may also be additional studies in the future. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-23 Figure 3.10: Potential Areas of Change from 2008 Plan Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-24 Figure 3.11: Potential Areas of Change for 2018 Plan Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-25 Future Land Use Land Use Plan The future land use plan is the guide for the allowed type and intensity of development citywide. It does not provide the full level of detail shown in the zoning code – rather, it is overarching guidance for the patterns, to ensure decisions made through the city’s regulatory and enforcement process are consistent with a comprehensive approach and strategy. As a developed community, the future land use plan does not change dramatically from year to year. The boundaries of Edina are not expected to be altered and many of the overall patterns have been established for decades. Despite this, the city has capacity to accommodate growth and change through the redevelopment and renewal of sites in targeted areas. Figure 3.12 shows the planned land use for all property within Edina. Table 3.5 summarizes the planned land uses by category shown on the map. The planned future land uses shown on this map reflect previous community planning efforts as well as desired updates identified as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update process. The following section provides definitions of the future land use categories shown. By way of comparison, the table also includes the range of housing units per acre for land uses that include residential. Table 3.5: Guided Land Use Acres Category Units Per Acre Acres % of Total Acres Low Density Residential 1-5 4,613 45.1% Low Density Attached Residential 4-8 125 1.2% Medium Density Residential 5-12 225222 2.2% High Density Residential 12-60 179 1.7% Greater Southdale District Residential 50-100 68 0.7% Office Residential 20-75 315348 3.14% Office 6949 0.75% Neighborhood Node* 10-60 2622 0.32% Mixed-use Center* 12-100 68 0.7% Business Node 9 0.1% Community Activity Center 90-150 228 2.2% Industrial 279266 2.76% Open Space and Parks 1,311 12.8% Public/Semi Public 561 5.5% Regional Medical 50-100 45 0.4% Right-of-Way 2,112 20.6% Total 10,225 100.0% *Density within these categories varies by subarea. See Table 3.6 for details Source: City of Edina Updates to future land use acreages based on guidance in Cahill District Area Plan. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-26 Figure 3.12: Future Land Use 7125 Cahill Rd parcel change from Neighborhood Node to Industrial Change from Office and Industrial to Office Residential to allow for new mixed-use district as described in the Cahill District Area Plan Change from Office and Industrial to new Business Node category as described in the Cahill District Area Plan Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-27 Future Land Use Categories The categories in Table 3.6 apply to the Future Land Use Plan. Land use categories are broader and more long-term in scope than zoning districts. The land use plan and the zoning ordinance should be consistent with one another but not necessarily identical. Each land use category may be implemented through more than one zoning district, allowing for differences in building height, bulk and coverage in different areas of the city. Some revisions to existing zoning districts or creation of new districts may be needed as part of the implementation of the land use plan. Land in cities is categorized first by how it is used, and secondarily by the scale and intensity of that use. For residential uses, density is defined in terms of dwelling units per net acre (exclusive of major road rights-of-way and public lands). For nonresidential and mixed-uses, intensity is typically defined in terms of floor-to-area ratio, or FAR, which refers to the ratio of a building’s total floor area to the size of its lot. Thus, a maximum FAR of 1.0 could allow for a two-story building covering 50% of the lot, a three- story building on one-third of the lot, and so on. FAR limits for uses are regulated through the City’s zoning code. Building heights are not specified in the table because height will vary within and between categories, based on neighborhood context, infrastructure, and community design goals. The small area plans incorporated by reference here provide more detailed information on height and density guidance. The “Development Guidelines" in the table below are intended to highlight important design considerations for each land use category but are not regulatory in nature. The maximum densities given may not be achievable on all development sites, and other factors besides comprehensive plan guidelines are used to determine the appropriate scale and density of development on a site. The density ranges shown in this plan are consistent with those developed in the small area planning process for the designated areas of change. They are also consistent with Metropolitan Council standards for existing and planned transit service levels, and Edina’s classification as an Urban community. While the system statement prepared for Edina by the Metropolitan Council identifies Edina as being within the area of influence for the Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport (MSP). As it is within the six nautical mile radius, this includes limitations on new landfills and wind towers, neither of which are planned for Edina. See Appendix A for a map of airport influence areas and Chapter 5 Transportation for more information on aviation. The Metropolitan Council requires that Edina address aggregate resources in its comprehensive plan. Appendix A includes a map that shows aggregate resources superimposed over future land use patterns. Although the regional Aggregate Resources Inventory shows some former gravel mining operations within city limits, all of these have been discontinued, and the sites have been subsequently urbanized. There is no plan to do any further mining within Edina, so there are no potential land use conflicts. For more information on protection of special and natural resources, see Chapter 6 Parks, Chapter 8 Energy and Environment, and Chapter 13 Heritage Preservation. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-28 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** LDR Low Density Residential Applies to largely single- family residential neighborhoods, encompassing a variety of lot sizes and street patterns. Typically includes small institutional uses such as schools, churches, etc. Massing standards (under development) and impervious coverage limitations would apply to ensure compatibility of infill construction. 1 - 5 residential dwelling units/acre LDA Low-Density Attached Residential Applies to two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts. May include single-family detached dwellings. Introduction of more contemporary housing types, such as low- density townhouses, may be an appropriate replacement for two- family dwellings in some locations, provided that adequate transitions to and buffering of adjacent dwellings can be achieved. 4 - 8 residential dwelling units/acre MDR Medium- Density Residential Applies to attached housing (townhouses, quads, etc.) and multi-family complexes of moderate density. May also include small institutional uses. In new development or redevelopment, improve integration of multi-family housing into an interconnected street network and work to create an attractive, pedestrian-friendly street edge. 5 – 12 residential dwelling units/acre HDR High-Density Residential Existing “high-rise" and other concentrated multi- family residential, some of which may contain a mixed- use component. May also include limited office, service, or institutional uses primarily to serve residents’ needs. Provide incentives for updating older multifamily buildings. The Comprehensive Plan provides a description of these areas. Densities are based on units per acre. Work to create an attractive, pedestrian- friendly street edge and provide convenient access 12 – 60 residential dwelling units/acre Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-29 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** to transit, schools, parks, and other community destinations. GSDR Greater Southdale District Residential Primarily residential area located in the core of the Greater Southdale District. Compared with other multifamily districts, this one has more compact buildings, structured parking, and a stronger focus on transit supportive densities. This may include some mixed-use elements compatible with residential development, such as small-scale retail, services, and institutional uses. 50 – 100 residential dwelling units/acre NN Neighborhood Node*** Current examples: • 44th & France • 70th & Cahill • Valley View & Wooddale In general, small-to moderate-scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood(s). Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood-serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential. Building footprints generally less than 20,000 sq. ft. (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage underground parking (for comparatively larger developments), district parking for smaller developments, and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. Varies by small area: • Wooddale/Valley View – 12-30 du/acre • 70th & Cahill – 10-50 du/acre • 44th & France – 12- 60 du/acre 30%/70% residential/commercial mixed-use BN Business Node Primary uses: small- to moderate-scale retail, office, and service businesses. Building footprints generally less than 20,000 sq. ft. (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage underground parking (for comparatively larger developments), district parking for smaller Floor to Area Ratio – Per Zoning Code Creating new Business Node Category as described in the Cahill District Area Plan Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-30 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** developments, and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. OR Office Residential Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher-intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway-oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed -use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed- use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. Within the Cahill District, refer to the Cahill District Area Plan for more specific guidance. 20 – 75 residential dwelling units/acre 50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use O Office This designation allows for professional and business offices, generally where retail services do not occur within the development unless they are accessory uses that serve the needs of office building tenants. Vehicle access requirements for office uses are high; however, traffic generation from office buildings is limited to morning and evening peak hours during weekdays. Office uses Provide buffer/transition to adjacent residential uses. Use high quality permanent building materials and landscaping. Encourage structured parking. Floor to Area Ratio – Per Zoning Code: Maximum of 0.5 Office Residential will be used as the broader category for the mixed-use district with more specific development guidance provided in the Cahill District Area Plan. Propose removing specific reference to zoning standard to avoid future conflicts with possible code amendments or variances. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-31 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** should be located generally along arterial and collector streets. MXC Mixed-Use Center Current examples: • 50th and France • Grandview Established or emerging mixed-use districts serving areas larger than one neighborhood (and beyond city boundaries). Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites. Maintain existing, or create new, pedestrian and streetscape amenities. Encourage or require structured parking. Buildings may “step down" in height from intersections. Varies by small area: Varies by small area: • 50th & France – 12- 75 du/acre • Grandview – 20-100 du/acre 50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use CAC Community Activity Center Contains larger scale uses, height and coverage. Primary uses: Retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings. Secondary uses: Institutional and recreational. Mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites. Design standards for building placement, massing and street-level treatment. Where applicable, refer to small area plan for more detailed design guidance. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings may “step down" at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back" from street. More stringent design standards for larger buildings. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer- grained circulation patterns where feasible. 90 – 150 residential dwelling units/acre 50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-32 Table 3.6: Future Land Use Categories Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity Guidance** I Industrial Applies to existing predominantly industrial areas within the City. Primary uses: industrial, manufacturing. Secondary uses: limited retail and service uses. Development standards to ensure compatibility with adjacent uses; screening of outdoor activities. Floor to Area Ratio – Per Zoning Code: Maximum of 0.5 RM Regional Medical Hospitals, senior housing*, affordable housing, medical and dental offices and clinics, and laboratories for performing medical or dental research, diagnostic testing, analytical or clinical work, having a direct relationship to the providing of health services. General office uses are permitted. * Senior housing may include independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Design standards for building placement, massing and street-level treatment. Pedestrian circulation and open space amenities should be provided for larger sites. 50 – 100 senior residential and affordable dwelling units/acre 50%/50% estimated residential/commercial mixed-use OSP Open Space and Parks Applies to major parks and protected open space that is publicly owned. Performance and buffering standards for intensive outdoor recreation and parking. See Parks chapter for how future growth will be accommodated in the parks system. N/A PSP -Public/Semi- Public Applies to schools, large institutional uses (churches, cemeteries) and semi-public uses such as country clubs. Some small uses of these types may be integrated into other land use districts. Performance and buffering standards for intensive outdoor recreation, parking. N/A *Floor-to-area ratio, or FAR, refers to the ratio of a building’s floor area to the size of this lot. **For mixed use categories, estimated percentage of residential/commercial use split is included for the purposes of calculating capacity for growth. These are not binding requirements for specific development projects. Propose removing specific reference to zoning standard to avoid future conflicts with possible code amendments or variances. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-33 ***Due to Metropolitan Council requirements, neighborhood node density guidance has been revised to provide minimum and maximum ranges for each identified area. Source: City of Edina Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-34 Allocating Growth and Density The potential change areas on Figure 3.11 are the primary areas intended to accommodate the forecasted growth of housing units and employment uses through 2040. In addition to identifying potential developable areas, there needs to be guidance to determine an acceptable range of residential density within areas, based on consistency with city policy and ordinances. Adequate density ranges are necessary to show the ability to accommodate all forecasted growth, if realized, as well as to strengthen the city’s tax base, support regular transit service, and ensure efficient use of limited land. Table 3.7 details the acreages within the change areas. It does not include acres that are considered permanently non-developable, such as right of way, though it does include occupied development sites which may redevelop in the future. Note that the redevelopment areas are a subset of the overall future land use designations, so these totals are different than the overall future land use categories. Table 3.7: Future Land Use in Change Areas (in Acres) Category Developable Non- Developable Total % of Developable Low Density Residential 6.84 0.15 6.99 1% Low Density Attached Residential 2.72 0.06 2.78 0% Medium Density Residential 2.48 1.14 3.62 0% High Density Residential 81.45 5.05 86.5 11% Greater Southdale District Residential 68.12 0.17 68.29 9% Neighborhood Node 23.89 19.91 0.32 24.21 20.23 3% Office Residential* 223.5 4.15 227.65 31% Mixed-use Center* 41.54 0.67 42.21 6% Community Activity Center* 226.64 1.36 228 31% Regional Medical Center* 44.31 0.28 44.59 6% Industrial 3.98 0 3.98 1% TOTAL 721.49 13.35 734.84 100% *mixed-use Source: City of Edina Based on the density ranges shown on the future land use map, Table 3.8 shows the range of residential units per acre that are expected to be added through new development and redevelopment. The actual range of densities may vary based on specifics of propose development projects and the site. These ranges will be used to calculate land needs for new development and redevelopment should it occur. For the purposes of allocating growth at the city level, the calculations below aggregate the total acres available for development across all change areas. The small area plans incorporated by reference provide more specific guidance as to the allocation of growth within those areas. Accounts for parcel at 7125 Cahill Rd changing from Neighborhood Node to Industrial within the Change Area. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-35 Table 3.8: Residential Expected Density Ranges Type Units/Acre (Min) Units/Acre (Max) Low Density Residential 1 5 Low Density Attached Residential 4 8 Medium Density Residential 5 12 High Density Residential 12 60 Greater Southdale District Residential 50 100 Neighborhood Node** 10 60 Office Residential* 20 75 Mixed-use Center* ** 12 100 Community Activity Center* 90 150 Regional Medical Center* 50 100 *mixed-use ** as the range varies by subarea, this aggregate number is just for calculation purposes; see Table 3.6 for actual policy guidance by subarea Source: City of Edina Correspondingly, measures of jobs per acre can be used to calculate estimated employment intensity and to determine land needed to accommodate forecasted job growth. Using observed information about typical job density ranges and the city’s employment projections, an estimate of jobs/acre can be developed to project need for additional commercial and industrial land. Table 3.9 summarizes these ranges. Table 3.9: Commercial/Industrial Expected Density Ranges Minimum Jobs/Acre Maximum Jobs/Acre Neighborhood Node 10 30 Business Node 10 30 Office Residential 35 40 Mixed-use Center 25 30 Community Activity Center 70 75 Regional Medical Center 45 50 Office 40 45 Industrial 40 45 Source: City of Edina Estimated Land Requirements Based on the above future land use plan and expected density ranges, estimated residential and commercial land use requirements have been calculated. The purpose is to help Edina plan for and accommodate growth in population, households, and employment should the Metropolitan Council projections be realized. Residential calculations are detailed in Table 3.10 and commercial calculations are detailed in Table 3.11. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-36 Since this is a fully developed community, development will take place on sites that already have some existing use. It is assumed that there will be no net loss of housing units or jobs with the construction of infill development. This is possible, particularly with infill development of sites with a very low population or job count, and/or a significant amount of land dedicated to uses such as surface parking. Residential Table 3.910 estimates residential acres needed for forecasted growth through 2040. Based on the assumptions in this plan, accommodating the planned growth in population and households in Edina will require 79-274 acres of land. This assumes that all projected growth will be accommodated within the designated change areas, and the percentage of units will be distributed roughly based on the total acreage currently present for residential and mixed-use land use types. It also assumes no loss of existing residential units, so actual development may need to be higher if any units are displaced in the process. There are approximately 725 total acres of residential or mixed-use land in these change areas. Between 11% to 38% of that total may be impacted by development by 2040. Table 3.10: Demand for Residential Acres Through 2040 Density Range (Units/Acre) Units Needed Minimum Acres Maximum Acres Type Minimum Maximum Low Density Residential 1 5 0 0 0 Low Density Attached Residential 4 8 0 0 0 Medium Density Residential 5 12 0 0 0 High Density Residential 12 60 889 15 74 Greater Southdale District Residential 50 100 706 7 14 Neighborhood Node* ** 10 60 26 1 3 Office Residential* 20 75 2,237 30 112 Mixed-use Center* ** 12 100 368 4 31 Community Activity Center* 90 150 2,805 19 31 Regional Medical Center* 50 100 461 5 9 Total 7,491 79 274 *mixed-use land use type ** as the density range varies by subarea, minimum density calculations are based on overall minimum guided density for the land use category; see Table 3.6 for actual policy guidance by subarea Source: City of Edina Commercial/Industrial Based on similar assumptions, Edina will need 79-99 acres of land for commercial/industrial uses. This assumes no net loss of existing jobs in these areas, so the actual totals may be higher if there is a redevelopment of sites that removes jobs. Additionally, it is possible that the density range for jobs may be higher or lower in some cases, depending on the scale and intensity of the development and whether it is a mixed-use. References the wrong table. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-37 The total acres of commercial or mixed-use land in these change areas is around 571 acres, so this estimates that between 14% to 17% of that total will be impacted by commercial/industrial development by 2040. Table 3.11: Demand for Commercial/Industrial Acres Through 2040 Density Range (Jobs/Acre) Jobs Needed Minimum Acres Maximum Acres Minimum Maximum Neighborhood Node 10 30 160140 5 1614 Office Residential 35 40 1526 38 44 Mixed-use Center 25 30 283303 910 1112 Community Activity Center 70 75 1506 20 22 Regional Medical Center 45 50 295 6 7 Office 40 45 0 0 0 Industrial 40 45 0 0 0 Total 3770 79 99 Source: City of Edina Staged Development and Redevelopment Tables 3.12 and 3.13 show the staging of development within the change areas in terms of units and net acres. Given the fully developed character of the city, the future land use plan does not include a specific schedule for staging or phasing of redevelopment. Public utilities and services have already been extended to all parts of the city, so there is no need to show staging for extension of infrastructure. Furthermore, the water supply, local water management, and wastewater plans demonstrate that adequate capacity will be available by 2040, and at interim stages, to serve the needs of all forecasted growth within the city as identified in the comprehensive plan. However, there may be specific areas of the city where infrastructure capacity needs to be expanded to meet the needs of new development. The Public Works Department and Engineering Department will study needs for service capacity improvements throughout the city on an as-needed basis. Instead, the purpose of this staging plan is to show that adequate land is available to accommodate all forecasted growth within the city. The numbers in the chart below are based on development at minimum densities, and with no mixing of uses on individual sites, thereby identifying the potential maximum amount of land needed. For land use categories where there are different ranges depending on the specific area (such as Neighborhood Node and Mixed-use Center), the lowest number is used to calculate the capacity. These calculations show that the city has capacity to accommodate forecasted growth through 2040, without assuming maximum buildout of all sites. This does not mean, however, that this scale of development is necessarily preferable. As demonstrated in Tables 3.10 and 3.11, the amount of land developed could be significantly less if growth is accommodated in higher density projects. If planned growth occurs consistent these forecasts, the net residential density of the new development will be around 30 units per acre. This would meet expectations consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s Urban community designation for Edina. Accounts for parcel at 7125 Cahill Rd changing from Neighborhood Node to Industrial within the Change Area. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-38 Table 3.12 – Staged Development or Redevelopment - Residential Within Urban Service Area Average Density Range Housing Units/Acre Existing Development Acres (2016)* 2016-2020 2021-2030 2031-2040 Remaining Acres in 2040 Min Max Acres Units Acres Units Acres Units Acres Acres High Density Residential 12 60 81 194 16 425 35 241 20 10 Greater Southdale District Residential 50 100 68 162 3 355 7 202 4 54 Neighborhood Node* ** 10 60 76 6 1 14 1 8 1 4 3 Office Residential* 20 75 112 499 25 1,092 55 620 31 1 Mixed-use Center* ** 20 100 21 14 1 32 3 18 1 15 Community Activity Center* 90 150 113 709 8 1,552 17 881 10 78 Regional Medical Center* 50 100 22 106 2 231 5 131 3 13 Total 425424 1,691 56 3,700 123 2,100 70 176175 *mixed-use – available acres based on split between residential/commercial in future land use table; see Table 3.6 for percentages of mixed use by use type and Table 3.7 for acres available for development ** as the density range varies by subarea, minimum density calculations are based on overall minimum guided density for the land use category; see Table 3.6 for actual policy guidance by subarea Source: City of Edina Accounts for parcel at 7125 Cahill Rd changing from Neighborhood Node to Industrial within the Change Area. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-39 Table 3.13 – Staged Development or Redevelopment - Commercial Within Urban Service Area Estimated Jobs/Acre Existing Development Acres (2016)* 2016-2020 2021-2030 2031-2040 Remaining Acres in 2040 Min Max Acres Jobs Acres Jobs Acres Jobs Acres Acres Neighborhood Node 10 30 1714 32 3 64 54 6 5 64 54 6 5 10 Office Residential 35 40 112 301 9 602 17 602 17 69 Mixed-use Center 25 30 21 56 2 112 122 4 5 112 122 4 5 109 Community Activity Center 70 75 113 305 4 610 9 610 9 92 Regional Medical Center 45 50 22 60 1 119 3 119 3 16 Total 285 282 754 20 1,508 39 1,508 39 186184 Source: City of Edina The Transportation Chapter provides direction for improvements to the multimodal transportation network to address the needs of planned growth for the city – including bicycle, pedestrian, roadway, and transit modes. While improvements are planned citywide, the focus is around increased travel needs in and around the planned growth areas, particularly the Greater Southdale District. See that chapter for more information on potential planned projects and general policy guidance. The Water Chapter provides direction for improvements to the sanitary sewer, stormwater, and water supply systems needed to address planned growth. While improvements are planned citywide, the focus will be on planned growth areas, particularly the Greater Southdale District. Presently, the sewer and water supply systems in that area of the city have the greatest capacity for additional users, supporting the city’s overall land use plan for growth in that area. See that chapter for more information on potential planned projects and general policy guidance, including how the increased demand for stormwater treatment will be managed in a fully developed community. Accounts for parcel at 7125 Cahill Rd changing from Neighborhood Node to Industrial within the Change Area. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-40 Community Design Guidelines In order for Edina to remain economically competitive, attractive to residents, businesses, and visitors, and sustainable, the community must be more than functionally responsive. Edina must also be beautiful, vibrant, safe, inclusive, and promote active living. The principles and guidelines in this chapter are intended to help the City achieve this vision by focusing on the design of the built environment and the natural environment. The community design principles apply to both City actions and private sector development. The City is responsible for designing, maintaining and improving its streets, parks, public buildings and other public spaces. The private sector is encouraged to design buildings, structures and landscape features that complement and support the public realm and fit within the context of the surrounding neighborhoods or districts. This section provides principles and guidelines for buildings, site design, and interconnecting spaces. The 2008 comprehensive plan also included guidance for citywide movement patterns and public spaces. This has subsequently been replaced by the Living Streets Plan (2015). Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Plan defines Edina's vision for living streets and addresses how the vision is implemented by providing information on street design, traffic calming, bike facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design process. See the Transportation Chapter for additional information on how the Living Streets Plan is incorporated in the comprehensive plan. As a largely developed city, Edina’s future growth will be built on infill and redevelopment sites and will need to fit in, improving the character of surrounding areas. The small area plans provide more detailed guidance for specific redevelopment areas of the city. The following overall principles, focused primarily on aesthetic issues, provide general guidance when redevelopment occurs. Principles 1. Design buildings with an interesting and varied pedestrian-scaled street frontage, as expressed through building massing, façade articulation, materials, and details. 2. Recognize that diverse architectural styles can be employed to achieve city-building goals. 3. -Position buildings to fit with their existing and/or planned context by facing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. 4. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. 5. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. Buildings should have an interesting and varied pedestrian-scaled street frontage, with parking located to the rear when possible. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-41 Guidelines: Low-Density Design (Residential) 1. Control the scale and massing of infill housing to make it reasonably compatible with established residences. Recent zoning changes have partially addressed this issue. Future zoning changes should refer to and consider the small area plans discussed earlier in this chapter. Other techniques that may be considered include: • a graduated scale, or floor area ratio that relates building size to lot size; • an impervious surface maximum to ensure that a reasonable percentage of each lot remains as green space, for aesthetics and stormwater management; • design standards that guide the stepping back of building mass and height from adjacent residential buildings and parks. 2. Building and garage placement. Many neighborhoods and individual blocks have an established pattern of building placement, spacing, landscape treatments, front yard setbacks and garage placement that combine to convey a particular neighborhood character. For example, most garages in the city’s older traditional neighborhoods are detached and located within the rear yard. While new construction is likely to vary from this pattern, some limits on the degree of variation may be appropriate in areas such as historic districts. For example, the following guidelines should be considered: • The width of front-loaded garages is limited so that they occupy no more than a defined percentage of the front façade; • Driveway width at the curb is limited; • Front-loaded garages may be required to meet the same setback as the rest of the front façade. 3. Integration of multi-unit housing into transitional areas. In the past, duplexes were located along many major thoroughfares in Edina as a kind of buffer or transition to the adjacent single-family housing. Today this housing type is in need of updating or replacement in many locations, and high land and redevelopment costs create pressure for higher-density housing types. Townhouse complexes have been constructed in locations such as north France Avenue. The challenge is that in many locations the duplexes Infill housing can be scaled to be compatible with the neighborhood context. Parking located to the rear of a property creates a more pedestrian friendly street frontage. Multifamily housing can be scaled to be compatible with lower density neighborhoods. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-42 are only one lot deep, which makes it difficult to provide an adequate transition to single-family scale. The following sections broadly address the issue of integrating multi-unit housing into lower-density, primarily single-family neighborhood transitional areas. 4. Single-family characteristics. Attached and multifamily housing should emulate single-family housing in its basic architectural elements – pitched roofs, articulated facades, visible entrances, porches or balconies. Taller buildings should step down to provide a height transition to existing adjacent residential buildings. 5. Level of formality. Design the front and back facades with appropriate levels of formality. The front, as the more public side of the house, will receive the more formal treatment, with the main entrance, porch or steps and landscaping, while trash/recycling storage, play equipment and outdoor storage should be located in the back. 6. Parking to the rear. Where rear-loaded or detached garages predominate, parking spaces and garages should be located to the rear of the lot or interior of the block. If this is infeasible, garages should be recessed some distance behind the main façade of the house and surface parking should be placed within side yards to the extent feasible. 7. Mechanical systems on all buildings should be positioned so they are not visible from the public view, unless they are an integral part of the architectural design (i.e. photovoltaic roof tiles). Solar panels, satellite dishes and air conditioning systems should be positioned to the back or side yard of the house or screened by plantings or low walls. 8. Garages and outbuildings should be designed in character with the primary residence on the site. When placed on an alley or lane, the design should contain windows that provide a view to the lane, for additional security. When attached, the garage elevation should not dominate the street elevation of the primary residence. Parking to the rear can create attractive pedestrian oriented environments. Multifamily housing can emulate architectural elements of neighborhood context. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-43 Guidelines: Medium- and High-Density Design (All Uses) 1. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. a. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. Permeable hardscape, where appropriate, may be preferred over blacktop or traditional paving. Vertical “living walls” (trellis, vine-covered fences) are preferable to materials that absorb and reflect heat. b. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. c. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. d. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. e. Design surface parking to maximize stormwater infiltration and allow for groundwater recharge, using infiltration swales, pervious pavement or similar techniques. f. Where vehicle parking requirements exist, implement minimum bicycle parking standards as well. g. Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change. h. Enhance the appearance of parking ramps by designing the structure with the possibility of the addition of liner buildings when development opportunities are ripe. i. Use striping, curbs and landscape treatments, centralized walkway medians and islands, and textured paving to clearly define walking spaces within parking areas and adjacent to vehicular circulation. j. Use raised crossings, speed humps, and speed tables to discourage high traffic speeds in parking lots where pedestrian volumes are high. k. Locate and screen service and loading areas to minimize their visibility from public streets and adjacent residential areas. Visual screening and permeable pavers can create a more attractive, sustainable treatment for surface parking. Particularly in medium to high density areas, structured parking and shared parking support efficient use of land and increased walkability. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-44 2. Encourage Successful Mixed-use Development. As shown in the future land use section of this chapter, many of Edina’s commercial, office and industrial districts are evolving towards a greater degree of mixed-use. The land use plan encourages this evolution by defining land use categories that encourage combinations of compatible uses. Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses. The City of Edina has several examples of successful mixed-use developments, most notably the 100-acre Centennial Lakes area and the 24-acre Edinborough project. Additionally, there are opportunities to encourage mixed use in areas such as 50th & France, 44th & France, and Wooddale Valley View. The following guidelines are directed toward creating successful mixed- use environments. 3. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. In some cases, much higher window coverage may be appropriate. Mixed use development can provide an amenity for area residents and support multimodal transportation alternatives. A consistent street wall can provide an enhanced pedestrian environment, particularly in commercial and mixed use areas. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-45 4. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. • Encourage enhanced transit stops, including shelters, shade and seating where feasible. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.). 5. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed-use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed-use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. In the long term other factors will be impacting parking demand, such as the availability of autonomous vehicles, shared cars, bike and scooter share, and other modes that provide alternatives to driving and parking a car. 6. Improve Connectivity in Large-scale Development. Internal and external connectivity. As part of redevelopment or expansion of large-scale sites, reintroduce an internal local street and pathway network that connects through the site and to suitable entry points at the perimeter. The goal is to encourage pedestrians to reach the site and drivers upon arriving to continue all further movement by foot. As a result, the capacity of internal roads can be reduced and more area devoted to amenities, providing still more incentives to walk. Bicycle facilities should allow residents in surrounding neighborhoods to bike safely to the site. Transit stops should be provided in visible and central locations. 7. “Edge” or transitional uses. Moderately sized liner buildings should be encouraged to soften the edge of large-scale superblock development. Medium-density housing types such as townhouses combined with structured parking may also be an appropriate transitional use. Adding pedestrian and bicycle amenities and facilities can encourage people to walk and bike to destinations. Mixed use development provides an opportunity for shared parking between uses. Connectivity within large developments can support walkability. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-46 8. Provide appropriate transitions between land uses. Rather than discouraging movement between adjacent land uses with berms and fences, focus on creating elegant and attractive transitions between adjacent uses. Transitional areas include well-landscaped pedestrian walkways, seating areas, arcades, and other spaces that encourage integration rather than separation. 9. Buildings Frame the Street. Building placement and heights can serve to define the streetscape and visually reduce the apparent width of the street. Generally speaking, wider streets can accommodate taller buildings subject to the height limitations described elsewhere in this Chapter. 10. Façade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well-defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks or similar techniques. 11. Transparency and Natural Surveillance. Building forms and facades should provide an awareness of the activity within the buildings through frequent doors and windows oriented toward public streets and open space. 12. Variety of Building Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building types, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. 13. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks and public spaces. 14. Height. With the development of a series of small area plans as additional guidance for growth and development in Edina, the decision was made to not include guidance for building height in the main comprehensive plan document. This will allow for more flexibility in the development review process. Building height is still being addressed through the city’s zoning code and in the small area plans. Stepping down building height and scale can provide a transition to lower density areas. Buildings that frame the street and have transparent facades can provide a pedestrian- oriented experience. Varying building forms provides visual interest and aids in transitions. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-47 Land Use Goals and Policies Land use goals and policies are provided below. See the Implementation Chapter for related implementation steps, lead implementing agencies, and estimated timelines. Goal 1: Encourage infill and redevelopment that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. 1. Endeavor to accommodate private redevelopment in targeted potential areas of change, consistent with future land use guidance. 2. In reviewing development proposals, examine how land use and transportation are integrated to ensure that new development and redevelopment expand nonmotorized travel options that reduce the need for automobile travel. 3. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods and key destinations, and with other communities, to improve multimodal transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on cars. Goal 2: Support livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community changes over time. 1. Manage transitions and seams between different use, scale, and intensity types to mitigate any negative impacts and encourage positive connections between areas where appropriate. 2. Improve the current development review and approval system to provide clearer direction as to community design goals and encourage high-quality development that is compatible with its surroundings. 3. Incorporate Edina’s tradition of leadership in education throughout the city by providing and encouraging opportunities for residents to engage and learn about the community. 4. Pursue overall goals of promoting equity and reducing disparities in outcomes for people living and working in the community. Goal 3: Grow and develop sustainably to protect the natural environment, promote energy efficiency, conserve natural resources, and minimize the impacts of buildings on the environment. 1. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. 2. Encourage efficient use of land through shared functions where appropriate, such as stormwater management incorporated as a community amenity. 3. Maintain the current open space and wetlands acreage and seek to expand it whenever possible. 4. Encourage development types that are designed to function well in all seasons, including winter. Goal 4: Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. 1. Building on current efforts, seek options that allow for residential redevelopment that is sensitive to the community character and context, while expanding options for residents. Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-48 2. Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. 3. Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. 4. Investigate opportunities to accommodate Missing Middle housing within the city, defined as range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. Goal 5: Support and enhance commercial and mixed-use areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. 1. Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region. 2. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. 3. Support the development of mixed use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. Goal 6: Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 1. Ensure that the city’s roads continue to evolve to act as connectors, rather than as barriers. 2. Incorporate amenities and infrastructure into public corridors to make them beautiful, efficient, and multimodal public spaces that contribute to community identity and pride. 3. Encourage the development of living streets with enhanced public realms and integrated environmental functions, including potentially functioning as high-integrity ecologic corridors.