HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-10-25 Planning Commission Special Work SessionAg enda
Planning Commission Work Session
City of E dina, Minnesota
Com munity R oom, E dina City Hall
Wednesday, October 25, 2023
5:30 PM
I.Ca ll To Ord er
II.Roll Ca ll
III.Accessory Dwelling Un its
IV.Adjournm en t
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public
process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli"cation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: O c tober 25, 2023 Agenda Item #: I I I.
To:P lanning C ommission Work S es s ion Item Type:
O ther
F rom:Addis on Lewis, C ommunity Development
C oordinator Item Activity:
Subject:Acc es s ory Dwelling Units Disc ussion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Discuss the draft ordinance for accessory dwelling units and provide feedback to staff.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
Accessory Dwelling U nits (AD Us) have been identified in several of Edina's guiding documents, including the
C omprehensive P lan, Climate Action P lan and the Affordable Housing Strategy Task F orce Report as a potential
tool to further housing and sustainability goals. As such, the E dina P lanning C ommission's 2022 and 2023 work
plans included the directive to "review and recommend changes to city ordinances regulating Accessory D welling
Units". C ity staff and a sub-committee of the P lanning Commission met numerous times over 2022 to research
AD U s and how other cities regulate them. T he information was presented to the full P lanning C ommission at
their N ovember 16, 2022 work session. At their January 11, 2023 meeting, the P lanning Commission approved
an Advisory C ommunication recommending that the C ity C ouncil direct staff and the P lanning Commission to
draft an ordinance allowing AD Us. T he P lanning C ommission's recommendation was presented to the C ity
C ouncil at their F ebruary 7, 2023 meeting. At the M ay 16, 2023 C ity C ouncil work session, council provided
feedback to staff and the P lanning C ommission to continue with developing recommended zoning changes for
accessory dwelling units and to collect community input on the topic. T he C ity gathered feedback from the
community using an online survey, which received 136 responses. Two resident focus group sessions were also
held in an effort to have deeper conversations regarding AD U s in E dina. B ased on the research completed and
feedback received, a draft ordinance has been prepared. T he draft ordinance in this packet is not necessarily
meant to be a recommendation but rather a starting point for discussion. T he draft ordinance includes many
elements common among other cities' AD U ordinances that should be considered by the P lanning Commission.
T he C ommission is asked to discuss the ordinance and provide feedback to staff.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Draft ADU Ordinance
ADU Survey Results
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
1
ORDINANCE NO. 2023-___
AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
The City Council Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 36, Article I – IN GENERAL is amended as follows:
Sec. 36-10 Definitions
Accessory Dwelling Unit means a secondary dwelling unit located on the same
parcel as a single dwelling unit building, which includes provisions for living
independent of the principal dwelling, such as areas for sleeping, cooking, and
sanitation.
Section 2. Chapter 36, Article III – Site Plan Review is amended as follows:
Sec. 36-124. Exceptions. Except in those cases specifically cited within this chapter, the following
shall be exempt from the foregoing requirements of this chapter:
(1) Construction or alteration of a single-family or two-family residential building,
accessory dwelling unit or accessory building;
Section 3. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 2 of the Edina City Code is amended as
follows:
DIVISION II. SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT
Sec. 36-433. Principal uses. The principal uses permitted in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R-1) are
as follows:
(1) Buildings containing not more than one dwelling unit, including attached garages,
except that the building may also contain an accessory dwelling unit pursuant to
this chapter.
Sec. 36-435. Accessory uses. Accessory uses permitted in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R-1) are
as follows:
(1) The following accessory uses are permitted on the same lot as a single dwelling
unit building:
j. Accessory dwelling units subject to the requirements of this Chapter.
Commented [AML1]: This is intended to exempt an ADU from
the formal Site Plan Review process in Article III of the Zoning
Ordinance, similar to single-family and two-family residential
buildings.
Commented [AML2]: This is to avoid a contradiction with
allowing ADUs to be internal or attached to the primary dwelling.
Commented [AML3]: This would make ADUs a permitted (by-
right) accessory use, subject to the provisions outlined.
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
2
Sec. 36-438. Requirements for building coverage, impervious surface lot coverage, setbacks and
height.
(1) Building coverage.
e. The following improvements shall be excluded when computing building coverage:
1. Unenclosed steps and stoops less than 50 square feet.
2. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported by posts or pillars.
3. The first 250 square feet of an accessory dwelling unit.
(4) Height.
1. Single dwelling unit buildings and attached structures
accessory thereto.
2½ stories. For maximum height
see 4. below.
2. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling
unit buildings, but not attached thereto.
1½ stories or 18 feet whichever is
less.
3. Accessory dwelling units located above a detached
garage when all principal structure setbacks are met but
including properties abutting an alley where a 5-foot
setback from the alley right-of-way is maintained.
2 stories or 25 feet whichever is
less.
34. All other buildings and structures. 3 stories or 40 feet whichever is
less.
45. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall
be 30 feet. For lots that exceed 75 feet in width, the maximum height to the ridge line shall be
35 feet, and the maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot
exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet.
Sec. 36-439. Special requirements.
(2) One dwelling unit per single dwelling unit lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall
be erected, placed or used on any lot unless the lot is subdivided into two or more
lots pursuant to chapter 32. Accessory dwelling units shall comply with the
following:
a. Accessory dwelling units shall only be permitted on lots where the principal
use is a single dwelling unit.
b. There shall be no more than one (1) accessory dwelling unit permitted per
lot.
c. Accessory dwelling units may be attached to, detached from, or internal to
a single dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units must be fully separated
from the single dwelling unit by means of a wall or floor and have a
separate entrance than the single dwelling unit. The separating wall may
have a door connecting the accessory dwelling unit to the single dwelling
unit.
d. The accessory dwelling unit shall not be sold independently of the principal
single dwelling unit and may not be a separate tax parcel.
e. Rental of either the accessory dwelling unit or associated single dwelling
unit requires its own rental license pursuant to Chapter 10 of the City
Commented [AML4]: Building coverage is likely to be a barrier
to building ADUs. This provision is intended to provide some relief
to building coverage, while maintaining the requirement for
impervious surface.
Commented [AML5]: The ADU survey indicated strong support
for ADUs above detached garages; however, the existing height
limit of 18 feet for detached structures would make this impossible.
The intent with this provision is to treat a detached garage with an
ADU similarly to one that is attached to the primary dwelling, but
also differentiate between properties where the detached garage is
accessed from an alley and, therefore, has additional separation
from the property to the rear.
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
3
Code. Only one rental license is permitted per single dwelling unit
property.
f. Accessory dwelling units shall not exceed 1,000 square feet of floor area
except that an accessory dwelling unit located in the basement of a single
dwelling unit may occupy the entire basement.
g. Accessory dwelling units shall be at least 250 square feet of floor area.
h. Accessory dwelling units shall be constructed on a frost protected
foundation.
i. Connections for water and sanitary sewer shall be provided from service
lines shared with the principal dwelling unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Director.
j. Accessory dwelling units that are attached or internal to the principal
structure shall be subject to the following:
i. Shall abide by the height and setback requirements for the
principal structure.
ii. Only one exterior entrance shall be allowed on any side facing a
public street.
iii. Exterior stairs are not allowed on the front of the building. Exterior
stairs shall be built of durable materials that match the finish of the
principal structure. Raw or unfinished lumber shall not be
permitted.
k. Accessory dwelling units that are detached from the principal structure
shall be subject to the following:
i. Shall be located behind the rear building line of the principal
structure.
ii. Rooftop decks are not permitted.
Sec. 4. Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 3 – PARKING AND CIRCULATION of the Edina
City Code is amended as follows:
Sec. 36-1311. Minimum number required.
ff. Accessory dwelling unit. One space in addition to the number of spaces required
for the principal building on the property. Parking for an accessory dwelling unit is
not required to be enclosed and shall be provided on a paved surface.
Commented [AML6]: This would mean either the single family
home or ADU could be rented but not both. The other unit could
be occupied by the owner or a qualifying relative.
Commented [AML7]: 1,000 square feet is the existing
maximum for accessory structures in the R-1 District.
Commented [AML8]: This exemption for basements is from the
City of Crystal. It may not be practical to break up a basement and
still provide separate access to the ADU.
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
4
Section 2. This ordinance is effective ___________.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
ATTEST:
__________________________ _____________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication.
Bill to Edina City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of ___________________, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2023.
________________________________
City Clerk
ADU Sur vey
SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT
30 January 2019 - 10 October 2023
PROJECT NAME:
Accessory Dwelling Units
SURVEY QUESTIONS
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 1 of 23
Q1 Do you currently own a single -family home in Edina?
129 (94.9%)
129 (94.9%)
7 (5.1%)
7 (5.1%)
Yes No
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 2 of 23
Q2 What is your age range?
26 (19.4%)
26 (19.4%)
31 (23.1%)
31 (23.1%)
38 (28.4%)
38 (28.4%)
39 (29.1%)
39 (29.1%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
35-44 45-54 55-64 65+Under 25 25-34
Question options
Optional question (134 response(s), 2 skipped)
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 3 of 23
Q3 If ADUs were allowed in Edina, I would consider adding one to my property.
51 (37.5%)
51 (37.5%)
26 (19.1%)
26 (19.1%)
47 (34.6%)
47 (34.6%)
12 (8.8%)
12 (8.8%)
Agree Neutral Disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 4 of 23
Q4 What reasons would motivate you to build an ADU? Please check all that apply.
Permanent housing for another family member or friend Permanent housing for me
Provide a place for family/friends to stay when visiting Supplemental rental income Other (please specify)
Question options
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
40
17
36
22
3
Optional question (50 response(s), 86 skipped)
Question type: Checkbox Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 5 of 23
Q5 Either the ADU or primary home should be required to be owner-occupied.
72 (52.9%)
72 (52.9%)
30 (22.1%)
30 (22.1%)
17 (12.5%)
17 (12.5%)
14 (10.3%)
14 (10.3%)2 (1.5%)
2 (1.5%)1 (0.7%)
1 (0.7%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 6 of 23
Q6 A minimum of one off-street parking space, in addition to what is required for a single -
family home, should be required for an ADU.
45 (33.1%)
45 (33.1%)
27 (19.9%)
27 (19.9%)
33 (24.3%)
33 (24.3%)
25 (18.4%)
25 (18.4%)
5 (3.7%)
5 (3.7%)1 (0.7%)
1 (0.7%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 7 of 23
Q7 ADUs should be required to match the primary home in terms of appearance rather than
allowing flexibility in materials, colors, or roof style/pitch.
44 (32.4%)
44 (32.4%)
28 (20.6%)
28 (20.6%)
28 (20.6%)
28 (20.6%)
31 (22.8%)
31 (22.8%)
5 (3.7%)
5 (3.7%)0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 8 of 23
Q8 I would support allowing ADUs in Edina.
69 (50.7%)
69 (50.7%)
29 (21.3%)
29 (21.3%)
6 (4.4%)
6 (4.4%)
24 (17.6%)
24 (17.6%)
7 (5.1%)
7 (5.1%)1 (0.7%)
1 (0.7%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 9 of 23
Q9 I would support allowing interior ADUs. (A separate unit within the primary home,
typically within a basement or attic)
68 (50.0%)
68 (50.0%)
43 (31.6%)
43 (31.6%)
8 (5.9%)
8 (5.9%)
10 (7.4%)
10 (7.4%)6 (4.4%)
6 (4.4%)1 (0.7%)
1 (0.7%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 10 of 23
Q10 I would support allowing attached ADUs. (A separate unit built as an addition to the
primary home)
61 (44.9%)
61 (44.9%)
38 (27.9%)
38 (27.9%)
12 (8.8%)
12 (8.8%)
15 (11.0%)
15 (11.0%)
9 (6.6%)
9 (6.6%)1 (0.7%)
1 (0.7%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 11 of 23
Q11 I would support allowing detached ADUs. (A separate unit that is built as a standalone
structure)
59 (43.4%)
59 (43.4%)
28 (20.6%)
28 (20.6%)
9 (6.6%)
9 (6.6%)
26 (19.1%)
26 (19.1%)
14 (10.3%)
14 (10.3%)0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 12 of 23
Q12 I would support allowing ADUs above a detached garage. (A separate unit that is built
above a detached garage)
66 (48.5%)
66 (48.5%)
40 (29.4%)
40 (29.4%)
6 (4.4%)
6 (4.4%)
16 (11.8%)
16 (11.8%)
8 (5.9%)
8 (5.9%)0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree Don't know
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 13 of 23
Q13 Would you like to participate in an ADU focus group or interview?
47 (34.6%)
47 (34.6%)
89 (65.4%)
89 (65.4%)
Yes No
Question options
Mandatory Question (136 response(s))
Question type: Dropdown Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 14 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
7/21/2023 08:15 AM
The city might want to come up with some preapproved ADU plans
such as is done in Seattle. The plans could have exterior facades
frequently found in Edina. If owner occupied is required, this should
be only for the initial approval so as not to limit the sale and use of
the property in the future. The city should allow spec builders who
intend to sell to an owner occupant to include an ADU in their design
and development of a property. The ADU should be licensed and
treated as any other rental in Edina except if it is owner or co-owner
occupied.
Screen Name Redacted
7/21/2023 12:38 PM
While I agree ADUs should be allowed, creating the policy around
how they are achieved will be critical. For instance, not every site
allows for parking, other than off-site (on the street), which i would not
support. parking will be one of the bigger questions to address.
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 10:38 AM
Have several concerns about ADUs especially related to small lots
and parking. Parking: our residential streets are looking more and
more like parking lots which has conflicting consequences, especially
during Minnesota's long winter months and needed snow removal.
The language allowing ADUs must be very clear with little flexibility
and strictly followed.
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 12:54 PM
ADUs will be a vital option for families with aging parents, to allow
them to have independence, yet be close to family. As Minnesota's
aging population grows, it will be increasingly important to have a
wider range of housing options for them.
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 12:55 PM
No ADUs! Stop destroying the Edina qulaity of life.
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 01:23 PM
I hope the City of Edina will consider adopting the Accessory Dwelling
Units to solve our housing shortage and cultural changes in our area?
I look forward to the City of Edina meeting the housing and
sustainability goals (and follow past guided documents) by passing
ADU’s in Edina.
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 02:01 PM
No more making Edina a giant piece of concrete with all these high
rises and affordable housing units. The cut through traffic in our
neighborhoods is ruining our once wonderful quiet Edina.
Q14 Is there anything else you would like to share with us related to ADUs?
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 15 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 02:52 PM
Thank you for considering this option. With the pandemic, we've all
witnessed how life requirements can change for ourselves, our
families, our neighbors. Having the flexibility to create multi-family
housing for multi-generational homes or ways to earn income is
clearly a need as our communities age.
Screen Name Redacted
7/26/2023 08:36 PM
ADU' s make sense to allow families to have other family members/
friends to have independence and have access to support. Many lots
in Edina have space for an ADU as a separate unit or part of existing
unit. It's basically an addition. Many homes are over 5000- 8000
square feet of primary housing. Other homes have only 2000-3000
square feet and an ADU is an excellent option for more living space
on the property.
Screen Name Redacted
7/27/2023 08:15 AM
Edina has an increasing number of single family home properties that
are becoming rentals. A number of these rentals (two on our block
already) are home to a number of families. Even though the "rules"
are that you have to be from the same family, that is clearly not the
case. Over time, this is going to reduce property values. An owner
has a vested interest in maintaining their property. When renting, an
owner's interest is in receiving income on his/her investment. One
could argue that they also want to keep up the property but that does
not appear to be the current norm considering the rental properties
we have seen. Adding an ADU only exacerbates this problem. If we
want to add population, the City has clearing given the green light to
numerous apartment/condo projects and those that want an
affordable option for a number of occupants can go in that direction.
That is certainly a better alternative than 2+cars on the street coupled
with 4-6 in the driveway and two on the grass. In addition, multiple
occupants create more garbage and recycling which often overflows
and on windy days, blows down the street. Please drop this idea of
ADU's. Our town is experiencing enough slide in neighborhood quality
of life.
Screen Name Redacted
7/27/2023 02:23 PM
In home senior living is a huge issue. My current home where my 83
yr old father resides has a 1962 build with many stairs. Providing him
with a ADU set up for his aging needs would be overwhelming
helpful. I do not believe this will allow us to participate but for my
aging it may. Please pass!!
Screen Name Redacted
7/29/2023 10:29 AM
A lot to be learned. How is this working in other communities.
Pros/cons
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 16 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
8/02/2023 07:41 PM
I am supportive of ADUs in Edina. For detached ADUs, I would like to
know that there are setback requirements such that an ADU couldn't
be build right up to or against the property lot line. Additionally, I think
there should be some clear parameters on size so that the detached
units wouldn't look out of proportion to the primary home.
Screen Name Redacted
8/03/2023 04:58 AM
Design is everything in this case. If the effort is to squeeze out
additional income then the quality, design and durability may well
suffer and the impact on the neighborhood can be detrimental. The
potential projects must always require conditional use permits with
design oversight.
Screen Name Redacted
8/03/2023 12:28 PM
I think ADUs should be allowed because it will build density within
areas of single family zoning ( 93% of residential land use). Higher
density will support sustainability with public transit. It will also provide
more affordable options for single or downsizing households.
Screen Name Redacted
8/04/2023 02:38 PM
Is a great option for a family that has an aging parent who they want
closer and those who like multi generational living. It is also a space
for visiting family, a nanny or a caregiver who lives on site. Also, after
a divorce, if conditions are right, it makes co parenting more
available. In a neighborhood where all the adults are working, having
a retired adult present during the day proviides security and
potentially allows letting in service people to do deliveries and home
repairs. It makes neighborhoods more multigenerational and keeps
elders out of expensive facilities that bankrupt them. There are many,
many benefits most people would not understand. Zoning detail is
need, but the NIMBYs need to realize they do not have a veto over
how others develop their property within code.
Screen Name Redacted
8/04/2023 03:44 PM
While we should do much, much more to relax zoning and eliminate
exclusive single family zoning, the extremely small step of allowing
ADUs of any sort and without parking requirements should be easy to
say yes to.
Screen Name Redacted
8/04/2023 03:53 PM
Concerned how impervious surface, utilities, setbacks, and building
heights would be altered if ADU’s were free standing on city size lots.
Free standing ADU’s should not change the character of SF zoned
residential. If allowed as rental units should follow city building code,
be inspected and registered/taxed as additional homestead. Limit the
number of ADU’s allowed on a block/neighborhood? Prohibit use as
VRBO. To ensure compliance city should modify 30 day occupancy to
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 17 of 23
6 month occupancy. ? Does the city currently enforce existing 30 day
rules? How many non registered ADU’s currently exist in Edina? Two
homes in my neighborhood in the 1990’s rented their basement ( walk
out) to a non relatives. (No longer a practice).
Screen Name Redacted
8/04/2023 08:55 PM
I used to live in Seattle and they allow all of this
Screen Name Redacted
8/05/2023 07:04 AM
ADUs rented should have requirements as other rentals
Screen Name Redacted
8/07/2023 03:12 PM
Regarding parking, I am assuming that the requirement to have an
off-street parking place could be met by parking the additional car in a
driveway. I would prefer that there be no specific requirement for
parking other that any existing space lost due to construction of the
ADU must be replaced (or satisfied by permitted driveway parking) I
support having ADUs be governed by the same requirements that
apply to the existing SFH on the property for: Height, setbacks,
occupancy, rentals, appearance, entrance orientation, permitting
process, neighborhood character. The lot coverage limit should be
whatever exists for the lot with no new special requirement. I support
having no density restrictions. I support permitting in all residential
zones including R1, R2. I support having no special fees for ADUs
and discounting permit fees as a way to encourage construction. I
support having no size requirements (with the minimum set by
livability requirements (separate entrance, kitchen/kitchenette,
bathroom, living/sleeping area). I support allowing the ADU to use
existing water and sewer capacity (unless there is a specific issue
created by the ADU). I believe the addition of an ADU should not
trigger a full reassessment of the house for taxes, just a
determination of the value added by the ADU. I support offering
funding programs for ADUs. designed to be affordable per the City's
affordable housing definitions.
Screen Name Redacted
8/08/2023 06:25 AM
I support tiny houses specifically and any rezoning or changes of
ordinances to make them more prevalent.
Screen Name Redacted
8/08/2023 12:15 PM
I think these make sense to allow. Because those occupying the ADU
may be college students or elderly, I don't think off-street parking
should be a blanket requirement. I don't think ADUs will do much to
address the shortage of housing, but everything helps, and allowing
more density can only help the environment.
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 18 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
8/08/2023 04:44 PM
I error on the side of allowing property owners more rights with their
land. All these restrictions and rules have a tendency to backfire.
Screen Name Redacted
8/09/2023 10:51 AM
A lot of this depends on the use made of the ADU. If used by the
primary homeowner, parking, for example, would not be an issue. But
it would be a huge issue for a rental. Would need to know the
proposed changes to the zoning ordinance - these would greatly
affect neighbors.
Screen Name Redacted
8/09/2023 12:06 PM
Generally I am in Vad or of this. But how would churches in Edina
that are zoned as R1 be affected by this potential new ordinance?
Would they have the right to add in multiple brand new units? It looks
like that would be the case if that’s what the new ordinance would
allow. I think the Edina public will generally be OK with ADUs,
especially in an existing house/garage or as a reasonably sized add-
on, but that it should be separated in the ordinance if a true
residence/house adds an ADU vs a Church or other entity zoned as
R1. If this ordinance was passed, many ADUs could be added on
empty Church land which would change the ‘unique charm’ of each
neighborhood.
Screen Name Redacted
8/09/2023 12:16 PM
I would seriously oppose using this type of ordinance, if approved, to
jam any (1) New building onto grandfathered properties that do not
have current R1 status or (2) Allow any construction of multiple ADUs
on the same property.
Screen Name Redacted
8/10/2023 12:44 PM
I live across the street from my parents and although it’s not the same
as an adu the value in multigenerational housing is a special gift. That
being said I think a key factor in allowing adus is that one unit must
be owner occupied and perhaps receive the blessing from at least
one adjacent property owner. I think a size limit to the adu would also
be important and a sustainability requirement as you don’t want the
adu taking up so much space that there’s no longer space for ground
water.
Screen Name Redacted
8/11/2023 01:45 AM
Lot sizes and residential density vary greatly in Edina. ADU
regulations should include lot coverage and setbacks.
Screen Name Redacted
8/11/2023 07:53 AM
I agree with the overall concept as long as the alteration/addition is
compliant with aesthetics of the home and neighborhood. Thanks
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 19 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
8/11/2023 10:57 AM
None
Screen Name Redacted
8/11/2023 01:47 PM
If ADU’s are allowed in nearby communities then residents have the
option to move to a nearby community and build an ADU. This is why
it is not needed in Edina.
Screen Name Redacted
8/12/2023 08:13 AM
Edina needs affordable options especially as the population ages
Screen Name Redacted
8/13/2023 08:44 PM
Please shorten/simplify the permitting process. Let’s help this work
well!
Screen Name Redacted
8/14/2023 04:30 PM
Stop ruining our city
Screen Name Redacted
8/15/2023 07:43 AM
ADUs allow for multi-generational families and/or caretakers to live in
proximity but with some degree of privacy. The also increase density
with a smaller footprint than apartments which are not zoned for 93%
of Edina. ADUs could allow seniors to stay in their
neighborhoods/own homes. Make permitting process straightforward
and simple if Edina wants to support ADUs, permitting in all
residential zones.
Screen Name Redacted
8/15/2023 07:09 PM
ADU are a good option that will allow the city to comply with its
affordable housing goal as well as with their climate action plan, since
it needs to increase density in order to reduce VMT and reduce GHG.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 05:57 AM
This would be excellent for aging parents or children with chronic
illnesses (like Long Covid) that can not work or earn enough for
independent apartment rent.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 06:36 AM
I would like to see further research that indicates the impact of ADUs
on the environment, housing supply, traffic, and lastly how Edina will
manage and tax these units.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 07:02 AM
ADUs are important but unlikely to have huge impact in Edina given
its sprawling nature. Instead, the city should allow multi family
dwellings on any lot by right and streamline building
reviews/processes with a focus on reducing time and cost.
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 20 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 09:36 AM
I would like to consider building one for my family.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 10:12 AM
Great idea, sorely needed.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 05:20 PM
I think a specific headcount of dwellers allowed per ADU should be
enforced.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 05:54 PM
ADU's are already allowed in virtually all our surrounding cities, and
farther out suburbs like Wayzata. We should look at their ordinances,
problems and successes, in writing our ordinance. There are many
positive reasons and the few potential issues can be minimized or
solved.
Screen Name Redacted
8/16/2023 08:25 PM
Please no
Screen Name Redacted
8/17/2023 04:26 PM
Concerns: (1) Where are the extra cars going to be parked? More
cars on streets will make it more difficult for snowplows to do their job.
I don’t want Edina streets to be like Minneapolis streets in the winter.
(2) Where will ADU occupants going to go during a tornado warning?
Only the internal ADUs in basements avoid unsafe conditions in this
regard. (3) Changing the ordinance will just make the rich richer
because it will increase property values. The land owner will benefit,
but nonlandowners will have to pay more to be a property owner.
Screen Name Redacted
8/17/2023 07:49 PM
An ADU is not a structure that many people would want on their
property. Re-take your survey that showed 60+ percent approved of
the concept. I was not aware of that survey. Please don't push
through this concept because the majority of the Council members
think it's a trendy good idea. Homeowners also want the privacy of
their own "castle". Edina does not have to emulate Mpls. in so many
ways. I did not choose to live in a mini-Mpls. I'm seriously considering
moving out of Edina at some point in time.
Screen Name Redacted
8/19/2023 10:00 AM
Our city is already what I consider overpopulated. We are opposed to
this change
Screen Name Redacted
8/20/2023 06:19 AM
1. Can the City offer any guidance as to how an ADU would affect
property taxes? Property taxes are already quite high in Edina, so
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 21 of 23
much so that it makes it difficult for retired and fixed-income families
to remain part of the city. 2. Would all existing building codes and
zoning (with the exception of allowing ADUs) apply to ADUs?
Screen Name Redacted
8/20/2023 02:16 PM
Making ADUs available in a way that is both responsible and
reasonable (i.e., carefully designed, appropriate guidelines that
assure every ADU blends well both with the existing home and, more
generally, the immediate neighborhood) offers an excellent option to
aging members of our community who have families or friends who
are able and willing to support them in this impactful, important way.
Screen Name Redacted
8/20/2023 04:33 PM
The whole tenor of the introduction is slanted toward the concept. It
gives an impression that input is really not going to be considered.
Screen Name Redacted
8/21/2023 06:35 PM
My answer to number 13 is maybe, would depend on timing and
location etc. Thanks!
Screen Name Redacted
8/22/2023 11:11 PM
The availability of this type of housing would have been wonderful for
my family years ago for my grandparents. I can think of no reason
why they should not be acceptable if there is sufficient land/space to
build one. Edina has been far behind the times in providing affordable
housing - this would be a fantastic option for those who want to stay
in Edina but need flexibility, convenience and the ability to stay close
to the unique area that is our suburb.
Screen Name Redacted
8/23/2023 10:33 AM
Since moving to Edina, we've seen our backyard neighbor add four
detached structures to their property (13X14 A Frame , two 8X10
sheds, and 1 car port 10X20). Non of these structures were present
when we moved to our home. Visitors are astonished to see this type
of activity in a residential neighborhood. While an ADU is great in
principle, allowing this will change the aesthetic of our residential
neighborhoods, and we feel isn't necessary or what brought us to
Edina to begin with.
Screen Name Redacted
8/23/2023 12:25 PM
I think it would be important for people to consider resale and
financeability on properties with ADU's. Also, what impact would
having more rental/income generating properties have on an average
Edina neighborhood. #4 - Primary home only.
Screen Name Redacted
8/24/2023 08:55 AM
This is necessary with the cost of assisted living and skilled nursing.
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 22 of 23
Screen Name Redacted
8/27/2023 03:13 PM
I have alway been a fan of ADUs. When I built my separate garage I
had to chose between electricity or water, not both. As far as parking
Edina has stringent street parking rules, that do not allow parking on
street for more than 6 hours. I appreciate no parking rules during the
snow season. Question 6 is not viable year round. I may like to
participate in a focus group but do not know what the time
commitment is?
Screen Name Redacted
8/28/2023 05:59 PM
I would also support short term rentals (ex. AirBnB) for ADUs and for
spaces in homes.
Screen Name Redacted
8/28/2023 07:20 PM
I believe this would have a negative impact on property values, tax
income stability and increased cost of services in our community. I do
not support showing ADU’s
Screen Name Redacted
9/06/2023 03:44 AM
I think ADUs would be a great idea and bring Edina to the future. It
would be a great opportunity for extended family (aging patents,
young adults)
Optional question (60 response(s), 76 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
ADU Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 October 2023
Page 23 of 23