Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2018-08-15 Planning Commission Packet
Agenda Plan n ing Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers Wednesday, August 15, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Planning Commission, July 25, 2018 V.Public Hearings A.Variance request for setback from south side and front lot line for a 2nd story addition above a garage at 5601 Tracy Avenue B.1.3 foot side yard setback variance to the east side yard setback and a 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the west property line at 5225 Divison Street. VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.Sketch Plan - 7200 & 7250 France VIII.Correspondence And Petitions IX.Chair And Member Comments X.Sta9 Comments XI.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampli<c ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: August 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: F rom:Minutes : P lanning C ommis s ion, July 25, 2018 Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P lanning C ommis s ion, July 25, 2018 C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: P lease approve the July 25, 2018, P lanning Commission M eeting M inutes. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes : Planning Commis s ion, July 25, 2018 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 1 of 9 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers July 25, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Miranda, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Mittal, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Chair Olsen. Staff Present: Cary Teague, City Planner, Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner, Debbie Townsend, Communications Coordinator, Scott Denfeld, Video Production Coordinator, Liz Olson, Support Staff Absent from the roll: Commissioner Jones III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the July 25, 2018, meeting agenda. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the May 23, 2018, meeting minutes. Commissioner Hamilton seconded the motion. The motion carried. Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the June 13, 2018, meeting minutes. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried. Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the June 27, 2018, meeting minutes. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Variance Request. 5901 Oaklawn Ave., Edina, MN. New home. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 2 of 9 Staff Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission that 5901 Oaklawn Ave., is approximately 8,575 square feet in area and is located east of Oaklawn Ave. and south of a portion of West 59th Street. The existing home on the lot is a one and one half-story built in 1916 with an attached one car garage. The applicant is proposing a 15 foot variance to the north/east property lines to allow for a new two story home with an attached garage to be built on the property. The existing home currently does not comply with all required setbacks with the home oriented closer to the north property line adjacent to the 59th Street West. The new home will be farther from West 59th Street than the existing home improving on the nonconforming setback. The northern portion of the property consists of vacated West 59th Street right-of-way which includes a perpetual easement over and across the property for the purposes of the passing and repassing of pedestrian traffic. There is a concrete stair with access path along the easement between Oaklawn Ave. and West 59th Street. This condition must remain. Aaker explained that the new home will provide a 10 foot setback from the lot lines adjacent to the West 59th Street right of way similar to the required interior side yard setback required for most similar lots that do not have the special condition of a street terminating behind the lot. The subject lot is considered a “through lot” requiring a 25 foot setback from lot lines adjacent to West 59th Street which severely constrict the buildable area of the lot. The existing home provides a 4.6 foot setback adjacent to West 59th Street. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends the approval of the 15 foot through street setback variance for the north property line at 5901Oaklawn Ave. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report and subject to the following conditions: The survey date stamped June 25, 2018. Elevations and building plans date stamped June 25, 2018. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. Appearing for the Applicant Burkley and Paige Carter, Homeowners Discussion/Comments/Questions Planner Aaker was asked by Commissioners if the variance is proposing new construction over a public utility. Aaker responded in the affirmative and that it is a sewer main, rather than a water main. Aaker explained that there have been a number of occasions in the past where this has come up on the East side. Commissioners responded that it may not be a good process to create a situation over a pressurized pipe. Commissioners added that they believe the solution would be relay or not create this situation. Commissioners questioned Aaker about the garage utilizing West 59th Street and now the large driveway utilizing Oaklawn Avenue instead. Aaker responded that from a zoning ordinance standpoint, driveways and sidewalks are not included in the lot coverage calculation. Aaker also noted that the curb Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 3 of 9 cut is reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The existing single stall garage off West 59th Street is not utilized. Planner Aaker was asked by Commissioners about the age of the water main pipe, in terms of needing to service or replace at some point. Aaker responded that it was added in 2006 and explained that there are requirements listed in the Engineer’s memo and that 3D easements have been done in the past over by Bridge Street properties. Commissioners inquired about sheet S1 of the document explaining the percentage of hardcover on the lot and Aaker replied that the building coverage would be at 19.1 percent. The plans do meet the requirements for zoning ordinance coverage of the size lot of either 2,250 square feet or 30 percent because the lot is less than 9,000 square feet. The proposed total hardcover for the building coverage is 2,242 square feet. Commissioners asked Planner Aaker why the City wouldn’t require the water main pipe to be moved as part of the project. Aaker replied that would be a question for the Engineering Department. Aaker continued to explain that the water main pipe is not in an easement area and is a city pipe. Options were given to the property owners. Commissioners explained that the city has an existing condition that might need some consideration. Aaker commented that the Engineering Department has reviewed and they are going to be working with the property owners, specifically the conditions outlined in the memo that they would have to adhere to if there was a variance granted. Commissioners asked if one of the conditions for the property owners could be that they’re required to move the supply line, as part of the construction. Planner Teague responded that our Planning staff relies on the Engineering Department’s opinion that it is not necessary to move the pipe as long as the conditions are met. Applicant Presentation Carter introduced himself and explained that they envisioned building a home on this lot and raising a family in this home. Carter stated that the garage is placed on Oaklawn Avenue to allow for more room for kids to play in the rear of the yard. Carter discussed the 3D easement and the concrete foundation underneath the garage area will only go down approximately 4 feet. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. None. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Hamilton seconded the motion. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners discussed the concern with the water main if any emergency repairs needed to be made that the Engineering Department would need to go in and start digging and be released from any reliability for damage. Planner Teague commented that the easement would be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney so the city would be covered in the instance. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 4 of 9 Commissioners commented that there is a potential being created where now would be the time to make corrections. The solution is to relocate the water main in an identified easement where we have access to it. Commissioners explained that it might have been helpful to understand more of the Engineering portion other than only being presented with the agreement. Commissioners restated that during demolition would be the best time to access to the water main. Commissioners commented to trust the Engineering Department and that the error of the water main is not on the homeowner, but rather the person who owns that water main. Planner Teague was asked by Commissioners if there was a hardcover restriction and he replied that it is on the list to cover in the work plan. Commissioners requested that the permitted building coverage be listed in square footage number as opposed to percentage in the packet Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to Staff conditions, also reflecting the adjustment in the table to the square footage as opposed to the percentage. Commissioner Hamilton seconded the motion. Vote of 7-2 (Nay: Strauss and Lee). The motion carried. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review, 7390 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop the site at 7390 France Avenue. The applicant would tear down the existing 6,136 square foot office building on the site and build a new two-story, 10,000 square-foot office building for Alerus, a banking and wealth management service. The building would have two entrances; one off of the parking lot facing west, and the other facing France Avenue. The building would be setback 50 feet from the paved portion of France Avenue per the Southdale Area Framework. A boulevard style sidewalk would be constructed. The 50-foot area would be landscaped green space. The site is small, .57 acres in size and the site shares parking and access to with the office building to the south. There would be 38 parking stalls on the Alerus property; currently there are 28. A parking study is underway to determine the adequacy of the proposed parking. The request would require the following: Site Plan Review. The following Variances would be required a. Building setback (north and south lot lines) b. Parking stalls Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 5 of 9 AFO, Architectural Field Office is reviewing the plans and will provide a memo in advance of the Planning Commission meeting. Teague stated that the Planning Commission is asked to provide informal review comments on this potential future development application. The City does not have as much discretion with this proposal compared to our recent Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests. This is a near code complaint project with requests for setback and parking variances. The proposed site plan has been designed using the Greater Southdale Area Framework. The plans provide a pedestrian entrance to the building facing France Avenue; there would be 50 feet of green space, landscaping, boulevard style sidewalk between the building and the paved portion of France Avenue. The applicant is open to the idea of closing off the access off France to provide more green space to resemble the site plan layout of the adjacent property to the north. The proposed building height meets City Code requirement. A traffic and parking impact study would be required. Sustainability. The applicant has been asked to respond to the city’s Sustainability Questionnaire within their formally submitted plans. Appearing for the Applicant Jeff Steiner and Jesse Hadley, JLG Architects Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners raised the following: Planner Teague was asked if the proposed building will appear to sit back approximately 10 feet from the existing structure. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioners also asked if the overall height, including the mechanical penthouse, will not exceed 48 feet. Teague also responded in the affirmative. Planner Teague was asked if the Greater Southdale framework and recommended heights on the east and west side included this property. Planner Teague responded that the document is still in the draft phase and are far from settled on what those numbers might be. The taller structures were further to the south. Teague also stated that the site is small and is more limited with the square footage. Applicant Presentation Steiner addressed the Commission and delivered a PowerPoint presentation highlighting the following: Steiner indicated that the intent of the design is to comply with the spirit of the 2015 vision plan for this district as well as satisfy the principal goals of the client. The height of the building and the wide street width makes it possible to create street edge with allowing and accommodating taller structures. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 6 of 9 There are a total of 3 variance requests that include the north edge of the parking lot which extends beyond the setback of the parking, the number of provided 37 parking stalls, and the building height of 48 feet with a 40 foot setback. The overall site plan includes open air mechanical equipment on the top/4th floor of the building with a 9 foot parapet edge to screen the mechanical equipment. The first floor of the building has entrances on the west and east side and are connected with a common circulation reception area with the offices located on the north side. The second and third floor have support functions in the core, offices on the north, circulation on the south, and work stations and conference rooms on the east and west. The transparency of the building is meant to activate the street to France Ave. with vision glass on the south and north side. The landscaping helps create the “street rooms” and a soft edge in regards to the trees along the north edge and the other low plantings. The natural rain garden on the north side that helps satisfy the storm water management and gives it a very natural look. Concerned about the idea of the double row of trees being added on the France Ave. in front of the building because it seems to contradict “activating” France Ave. The exterior materials of the building will include cladding it with curtain wall (glazing system) with butt glazing so the joints are thin and elegant. The vision glass will be on the north and south side of the building and the France Ave. facing elevation will have spandau glass with a blue tint. The grade generally slopes from the northeast to the southwest and, due to the slope, will be providing a retaining wall along the south side of the building and extending into a portion of the parking lot. Contemplating providing permeable paving in the parking lot to get well under the requirement for impervious surfaces. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners raised the following: The applicant was asked about the plan for lights at night. More specially, if lights would be left on at night in the building or up lighting from outside. Steiner responded that they would like to light the face of the building off of France Ave. Steiner added that they would like to have lit signage along with the interior being lit. The hours or using a timer has yet to be determined with the client. The applicant was asked if they saw an issue with moving the sidewalk further from the curb and the wiliness to explore that with the issue of the shared driveway. Hadley responded that there is an existing curb cut. At that curb cut, there isn’t currently a sidewalk that goes through the driveway easement. You circulate through the driveway to meet up with where the relocation of the proposed sidewalk would be in order to get the green space along France Ave. Hadley said they are trying to work within their site and not disturb the neighboring site. Commissioners inquired about the elevation in regards to the glass versus windows on the proposed building. Applicants responded that is it all glass. Commissioners followed up by asking if the inside walls with the stair cases were glass too allowing light to go all the way into the building. Steiner responded that they would like to have one stair case wall all glass and it’s a matter of cost and the stairs needing to be fire rated and one stair will likely be a sheet rock wall. Commissioners asked about the north side with what is and what isn’t a window because Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 7 of 9 one part looks different than the rest. Steiner explained that it is vision glass and the window appearance in the plans is the office door window in the building. Commissions commented that the restrooms were labeled men and women. The question was asked if there was a reason they weren’t gender neutral. Steiner responded that there is no reason there couldn’t be gender neutral restrooms. It was acknowledged by Commissioners that the building’s logo and color are quite impressive. Applicants were asked what the overall height is and Steiner responded that it will be 48 feet to the top of the mechanical penthouse. Commissioners asked if there were 3 floors total and Steiner replied that there are 3 floors. Steiner went on to explain that the first floor includes 15 feet floor-to-floor at the first level due to the 2015 revisioning for possibly lofting space on the lower level. It was suggested that due to the strong geometry of the building, applicants should consider the trees as a softening element. A honey locust was discussed as an example of the soft green against the blue looking very pleasing. The proposed geometry is a little harsh the way the building meets the ground and trees help to give scale, especially at the entry way. Commissioners commented on the transparency and cleaver how people will see the building coming down France Ave. with the glazing on both sides. It was suggested that the applicant reevaluate feng shui principals with the entrance and exit being lined up. The saying “what enters the door, exits quickly” could be seen as a negative in terms of money. It was suggested to possibly remediate it by adding a sculpture or something in the center. Steiner responded that the open 3 story area above reception may have hanging sculpture lights. Commissioners commented that the proposed building will stand out amongst the rest and that different is good. Commissioners commented on liking the project and the height is not enough, but is still more than everything surrounding it. It sets a good precedent for what the Planning Commission would like to see. Commissioners mentioned possibly again adding a double row of trees to add more of a buffer between France Ave. and the sidewalk. Commissioners suggested expanding the facilities to include a shower or locker room for the people that choose to use alternative transportation to work and provide a more active tone to the office space. Hadley asked the Commission how much space other developments creating and if there are examples in regards to widening the green space between the sidewalk and France Ave. Planner Teague responded that 8 feet is more than what they’ve been seeing. Engineering has not had the opportunity to dive into it specifically. Teague also said that they’ve been seeing a lot of 3 and 5 foot boulevards and 8 feet is a good start. Commissioners suggested just enough to accommodate a double row of trees. It was suggested that more than 8 feet or whatever can accommodate more space between the person walking from France Ave. and be closer to the building. Commissioners applauded the applicants for considering permeable parking area and it would be helpful. It was mentioned that 38 parking spaces instead of 50 was agreeable and could be used for landscaping. Commissioners also mentioned the attractive mechanical equipment on the roof. Not having the curb cut on France Ave. was also mentioned by Commissioners as being an enhancement if it’s possible for the building. Hadley commented that the challenge would needing buy-in from the property owner to the south due to the shared driveway. Commissioners asked if the plan included double trees and pushing the sidewalk back if the rain garden need to be replaced. Teague responded that there may be an opportunity to do both and the Forester can comment. The Civil Engineer commented that the rain garden was a nice was to incorporate the roof drainage. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 8 of 9 Commissioners asked the applicants to take a closer look at the storm water plan and commented that the proposed building would be a nice addition to the neighborhood. Commissioners asked the applicants to take a closer look at the storm water plan and commented that the proposed building would be a nice addition to the neighborhood. Commissioners commented on the L 1.0 drawing shows a monument sign adjacent to the side walk but it’s not shown in the perspective. Steiner responded that they are looking at different signs right now didn’t decide on one for the placeholder. Commissioners also commented that potential taller buildings could potentially look down into the mechanical roof and to consider a lattice screening on top. Commissioners suggested adding bike facilities or a type of indoor bike parking since the proposed building is so close to the 9 mile creek trail. Hadley stated that they want to come in line with the visioning of the Southdale Area and asked the Commissioners if there had any concerns in regards to the variances. Hadley stated that along the west property line there is an existing condition that has parking spaces straddling the property line so there is no setback from that property line. The variance for that was issued back in the 1960’s and they would like to reapply for that and maintain that existing condition. Commissioners asked if the parking straddling the line would cause implications with the potential of the woonerf north running north/south or could there be combinations on your behalf to make that work. Hadley responded that he didn’t see it as an issue for future development. Planner Teague stated that staff they didn’t see an issue and the lot isn’t deep enough for us to look at taking right away at this time. Commissioners asked Planner Teague to summarize the existing variance. Teague explained that the existing variance refers to the far west lot line. The lot line runs through the middle of existing parking stalls. That condition would be maintained with this project. If we were to require a 10 foot setback on both sides of the line, there would be loss of parking stalls. Commissioners commented that the 38 stalls instead of 50 appears to be a positive for this particular development. Commissioners asked if this was the first Alerus and if this is similar to other Alerus office buildings or if each one is customized based on location. Hadley responded that their client would like that to be confidential at this time, but will be able to answer to the question at the next meeting. Chair Olsen thanked the applicant for their presentation. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions None. IX. Chair And Member Comments Commissioners stated that they are pleased with planned dates to move forward on the Comprehensive Plan. There will be work sessions prior to each Planning Commission meeting going forward. Commissioners stated that the 70th & Cahill group has looked at a second draft and have decided to break down into sub groups of 2 or 3 members of the group and working on 1 chapter at a time. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 9 of 9 Commissioners congratulated fellow Commissioner Jones on placing second in the U.S. Extemporaneous Speaking at the National Speech and Debate Association's National Tournament. Jones also qualified to participate in the Great Communicator Debate Series Tournament in July at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Orange County, California. Commissioners applauded the Student Commissioners with their commitment. Commissioners positively commented on Clover Ride and its popularity during the first few weeks. The deviated stops often include Panera Bread. The riders have all been seniors and the bus can hold 16 passengers and 2 wheelchairs. The program has been funded for 1-2 years with possibility of adding another loop that would go up to 50th and Grandview. Commissioners commented on Limebike’s arrival and how it works with the app. Commissioners stated that the 50th and France working group has met 4 times. Commissioners stated that their first community meeting was a week ago and they’ve received good feedback. The next community meeting has been changed to Wednesday, August 22nd at 7:00 p.m. and the located has yet to be determined. Commissioners stated that infrastructure needs to be looked at for bicycles, especially near 44th and France Ave. X. Staff Comments None. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the July 25, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:45 p.m. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. The motion carried. Date: August 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:Varianc e reques t for setback from s outh s ide and front lot line for a 2nd story addition above a garage at 5601 Tracy Avenue Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as requested I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he subject property, 5601 Tracy Ave., is approximately 20,312 square feet in area and is located on the southeast corner of T racy Ave. and Vernon Ave. T he existing home on the lot is a multi-level home with a low pitched roof built in 1962. T he applicant is proposing a 2 foot side yard setback variance to the south property line and a 2.2 foot front yard setback variance to the west lot line to allow for an addition above the existing nonconforming 2 car garage. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report and Applicant Submittal STAFF REPORT Date: To: From: July 15, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Subject: B-I8-18, A 2 foot side yard variance and a 2.2 foot front yard setback variance at 5601 Tracy Ave. Information / Background: The subject property, 5601 Tracy Ave., is approximately 20,312 square feet in area and is located on the southeast corner of Tracy Ave. and Vernon Ave. The existing home on the lot is a multi-level home with a low pitched roof built in 1962. The applicant is proposing a 2 foot side yard setback variance to the south property line and a 2.2 foot front yard setback variance to the west lot line to allow for an addition above the existing nonconforming 2 car garage. The existing home currently has a 2 car garage located 8 feet from the south lot line instead of the required 10 feet. The applicant is undergoing an addition to the back of the home and remodeling project to the existing home to include a flat roof/contemporary redesign. All aspects of the redesign conform to city ordinances with the exception of the 2nd story addition above the nonconforming garage. The request is to maintain the existing nonconforming 8 foot side yard setback of the garage and reduce the front yard setback by 2.2 feet to bring the 2nd floor addition above the garage forward to create an overhang and add interest to the front facade. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 STAFF REPORT Page 2 5601 Tracy Ave. is a multi-level home built in 1962. The existing first floor of the house will remain and be remodeled. The proposed additions will include a conforming addition to the back of the home and a 2nd floor above the existing 2 car garage. The house is oriented toward Tracy Ave. with the side street setback of 14.5 feet along Vernon Ave. The existing house is setback 35.4 feet from the west (front) property line, 8 feet from the south (side) property line and 157 feet to the east (rear) property line. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Low-Density Residential R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage Proposed grading and drainage paths will closely mimic existing drainage paths... The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in a memorandum. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side — East Side - South— West Side — 15 feet 25 feet 10 feet 35.6 feet 14.5 feet, (exiting nonconforming) 157 feet 8 feet* 33.4* Building Coverage 25% 21.2% *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: STAFF REPORT Page 3 I) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. The practical difficulty is the garage was compliant with a 5 foot side yard setback requirement at the time of construction. The side yard setback requirement has been increased to 10 feet causing the current garage to be noncompliant. The 2nd floor cantilever is similar to an overhang, which is an allowed encroachment into the front yard area. The goal is to preserve and maximize the existing structure rather than tearing it down. Building on top of the existing garage and cantilevering two feet towards the street will allow preservation of the existing fireplace, open floor plan, etc. without completely removing existing nonconforming portions of the house. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The existing house is oriented on the lot much closer to the south property. At the time the garage was constructed, it was conforming to the side yard setback. The ordinances were changed, increasing the side yard setback creating a nonconforming situation that was not self-created by the applicant. The front yard 2nd floor cantilever will match the existing overhang and will add interest to the facade by breaking up the mass of the second floor. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The applicants are hoping to modernize the 1962 split level home. The proposal should enhance the existing structure and surrounding properties. Recommended Action: Approve a 2 foot south side yard setback variance and a 2.2 foot west front yard setback variance for property at5601 Tracy Ave. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: • Survey date stamped July 16, 2018 • Elevations and building plans date stamped July 16, 2018 • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo. Deadline for a city decision: September 14, 20I 8. DATE: August 9, 2018 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director FROM: Charles Gerk, PE — Graduate Engineer RE: 5601 Tracy Ave - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include the existing conditions survey dated 7/31/2017 and the proposed site plan dated 7/19/18. Grading and Drainage Grading for the proposed work will closely match existing grades. The proposed addition and remodel proposes approximately 926 sf of new impervious surface. The new and existing run-off will be directed to Tracy Ave with the use of controlled grades and a curb along the south lot line. The proposed stormwater management plan does not propose any drainage to neighboring private properties. Stormwater Mitigation The subject property ultimately drains to Hawkes Lake which has been identified in the 2018 Compressive Water Resources Management plan (5.3.1.6) as a structural flooding risk to multiple properties. Mitigation is required for the new run-off as it crosses the threshold requirement outlined in engineering policy document SP-003. To reduce the amount of overall runoff leaving their site and meet the standards outlined in SP-003, the applicant has proposed the use of a rain garden. The rain garden will be incorporated in their rear yard landscaping. In conversations between engineering and the applicant, it was determined the final placement of the rain garden would be determined after an onsite visit with engineering staff, the applicants engineer and the applicant, prior to landscaping starting. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Erosion and Sediment Control No Comments Street and Curb Cut A curb cut permit will be required if the applicant proposed replacing or relocating existing curb cut. Public Utilities No Comments Other Items The applicant has already applied for and received their Nine Mile Creek Watershed District erosion and sediment control permit. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 City of Edina Property Images 8/2/2018 5600 Tracy Ave 5600 Tracy Ave - Google Maps Image capture: Jul 2014 Edina, Minnesota .1* Google, Inc. © 2018 Google Street View -Jul 2014 https://www.google.conn/maps/place/5601+Tracy+Ave,+Minneapolis,+MN+55436/@44.9021732,-93.3679857,3a,75y,80.24h,90t/data=13m7ile1!3m511 ... 1/1 8/2/2018 5600 Tracy Ave - Google Maps Go gle Maps 5600 Tracy Ave Image capture: Jul 2014 © 2018 Google Edina, Minnesota Google, Inc. Street View - Jul 2014 7_, -.. , g'. Q.) ru u = • 03 ai (-- ) 0 0 https://www.google.com/maps/place/5601+Tracy+Ave,+Minneapolis,+MN+55436/@44.9021732,-93.3679857,3a,49.8y,130.53h,83.76t/data=13m7!1 el !... 1/1 C MH A021 SCALE 1" = 2V-0" DATE 7.9.2018 DRAWN COMM. NO. EROSION CONTROL PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 CONSTRUCTION ENTRY KAT TREE PROTECTION /— EXCAVATION OF I APPROXIMATELY 240 CUBIC YARD * S89°50'00"E 232.50 C NTRACTOR T/D TO SWEEP/ANY% or,/ .-.ROPERTY DAILY I : o f V DI MENUST BACK Tb / /"i 4i* FUTURE NATIVE PLANTINGS TO REPLACE LAWN \ op-0 00 0 0 w 9 co -L° mo CO SILT FENCE 0 4O PARTTAKEO FORROAD / / ‘0.' fo ho ‘4,t' \SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION N N 4 247.78 N89°50'04"W Usf IRE_ \ N PP PP \ \ 35.6 - NOTES: * 1. PER 5.2.1.a AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ANY LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITES THAT WILL INVOLVE EXCAVATION OF 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF EARTH - PERMIT REQUIRED DUE TO 240 CUBIC YARDS OF EXCAVATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 1 6 2018 CITY OF EDINA top ' Light / 0.4'a ECT 16-1 SHED FENCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT NAME: R. JONATHAN B. BARTLING I RACHEL LH. BARTLING DATE: 7.5.2016 REGISTRATION NUMBER: 45621 1 45464 MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Permit No. 2018-87 Is hereby issued to Rachel Bartling, subject to the conditions specified in the attached form. For: Home Addition 5601 Tracy Avenue; Edina; Grading and land alteration permit. Randy Anhorn, Administrator This permit expires on: August 1, 2019 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 16 Z018 cm? OF EDINA Permit #: 2018-87 Project Name: Home Addition 5601 Tracy Avenue_Edina Approval Date: July 6, 2018 General Provisions I. All temporary erosion control measures shown on the erosion and sedimentation control plans must be installed prior to commencement of surface or vegetation alteration and be maintained until completion of construction and vegetation is established as determined by NMCWD. If silt fence is used, the bottom flap must be buried and the maximum allowable spacing between posts is 4-foot on center. All posts must be either 2-inch x 2-inch pine, hardwood, or steel fence posts. If hay bales are used, all bales must be staked in place and reinforced on the downstream side with snow fence. 2. All areas altered because of construction must be restored with seed and disced mulch, sod, wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfaced within two weeks after completion of land alteration and no later than the end of the permit period. 3. Upon final stabilization, the permit applicant is responsible for the removal of all erosion control measures installed throughout the project site. 4. At the entryway onto the site, a rock filter dike being a minimum of two feet in height and having maximum side slopes of 4:1 must be constructed. This rock filter dike will enable construction traffic to enter the site and also provide an erosion control facility. 5. If dewatering is required and sump pumps are used, all pumped water must be discharged through an erosion control facility prior to leaving the construction site. Proper energy dissipation must be provided at the outlet of the pump system. 6. The NMCWD must be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencement of construction. 7. The NMCWD, its officers, employees and agents review, comment upon, and approve plans and specifications prepared by permit applicants and their consultants for the limited administrative purpose of determining whether there is reasonable assurance that the proposed project will comply with the regulations and criteria of the NMCWD. The determination of the NMCWD that issuance of this permit is appropriate was made in reliance on the information provided by the applicant. 8. The grant of this permit shall not in any way relieve the permittee, its engineer, or other professional consultants of responsibility, nor shall it make the NMCWD responsible for the technical adequacy of the engineer's or consultant's work. The grant of this permit shall not relieve the permittee from complying with all conditions and requirements of the permit which shall be retained by the permittee with the permit. 9. The issue of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. 10. This permit is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed upon the NMCWD or any of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting of this permit or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting front any act or omission of the permittee or any of its agents, employees, or contractors. 11. In all cases where the doing by the permittee of anything authorized by this permit shall involve the taking, using, or damaging of any property, rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly-owned lands or improvements or interests, the permittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of all persons, agencies, or authorities concerned, and shall acquire all necessary property, rights, and interest. 12. The permit is transferable only with the approval of the NMCWD (see NMCWD Rule 1.0). The permittee shall make no changes, without written permission previously obtained front the NMCWD, in the dimensions, capacity, or location of any items of work authorized by this permit. 13. The permittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable times during and after construction to authorized representatives of the NMCWD for inspection of the work authorized by this permit. 14. This permit may be terminated by the NMCWD at any time deemed necessary in the interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this permit. 15. Construction work authorized under this permit shall be completed on or before date specified above. The permittee may, in writing, request that the NMCWD extend the time to complete the project in accordance with NMCWD Rule 1.0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 1 6 2018 CITY OF EDINA SITE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS A022 5601 TRACY EXISTING HOUSE 10,-0" 5605 TRACY AVENUE, — \ EXISTING HOUSE ASPHALT ROOF, TYPICAP SECOND LEVEL 103'-9 5/8" FIRST LEVEL V100,4" 1 (1 13 178 ts1 LEVEL 96' O EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 1/8" =1'-0"' 1 O EXISTING ROOF PLAN ..L`.) 1/32" =1'-0" EXISTING SETBACK ENCROACHMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT WOOD SIDING, TYPICAL BRICK BASE EXTERIOR V SECOND LEVEL EXTERIOR MATERIALS TO BE: WOOD, CEMENT BOARD AND ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL 5601 TRACY AVENUE HOUSE JUL 1 CITY OF 6 2018 EDINA -A*0 18 11,u, RI6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 • • Y 1 103'-9 5/8" di FIRST LEVEL 100'-0" 1 1 1 ,A.GARDEN LEVEL • • v 96'-01/8" PLAN PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION O ROOF 1/32" =1'-0" O 1/8" =1'-0" PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT N COMM. NO. SCALE As indicated DATE 7.9.2018 NAME: R. JONATHAN B. BARTUNG I RACHEL LH. BARTLING DATE 7.9.2018 REGISTRATION NUMBER: 45621 1 45494 DRAWN JBARTLING 5 8 al 10LO" alp VARIANCE REQUEST GARAGE 2ND LEVEL 104'-4 5/8" 8'-0" 5605 TRACY AVENUE, EXISTING HOUSE Zv ;? CO "t. 112-10" 4frp:::ff IT 2-2 I 110'-10" al a l 3 3 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION gl EXTERIOR MATERIALS TO BE: WOOD, CEMENT BOARD AND ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL PLANNING DEPARTMENT .1UL 16 2018 CITY OF EDINA 35.4 FEET (SEE EXHIBIT A) SECOND LEVEL 10-9 5/8" SECOND LEVEL Ab., 103'-9 5/8" s'r FIRST LEVEL FIRST LEVEL 102-0" 102-0"— _ I -I EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL 9T-3 5/8" 9V-3 5/8" oik GARAGE 2ND LEVEL 104.-4 5/8" 35.4 FEET (SEE EXHIBIT A) IVEL 100LO" P" EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN GARAGE 2ND LEVEL_AL 104.-4 5/8" ‘F FIRST LEVEL kb, 102-0" EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 91'-35/8" 1/8" =1'-0" PROJECT INFORMATION: 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 BARTLING RESIDENCE REPORT WAS PREPARED BY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT REGISTRATION NUMBER: 45621 1 45494 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR NAME R. JONATHAN B. BARTLING I RACHEL LH. BARTLING DATE: 7.9.2018 O SCALE COMM. NO. DATE DRAWN JBARTLING 1/r = V-0" 7.9.2018 SOUTH ELEVATIONS A023 4 ' of Google Sunken 0, U '5501 Tracy Avenue SIgn In 5605 FRONT STREET SETBACK: 30-FEET FOR NEW UNDEVELOPED SUBDIVISIONS MAINTAIN THE AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK OF THE HOMES ON EITHER SIDE OR IF IT'S A CORNER LOT, MATCH THE FRONT YARD SETBACK OF THE ADJACENT HOME; OR THE FRONT STREET SETBACK SHALL BE THE AVERAGE FRONT STREET SETBACK OF ALL OTHER DWELLING UNITS ON THE SAME SIDE OF THAT STREET BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS. RId 80707 5601 Tracy Construction Drayrings. jbartiing&tga.cornA CAUseralacjonalhanb‘Documents1Revit Local Fl P7 2:1T111\!21 DEPP11111/19 LE CM' OF EDINA 7/20/2018 2.04:41 601 PROJECT INFORMATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT COMM. ND. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP BARTLING RESIDENCE SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT SCALE 5601 TRACY AVENUE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT 1" = 100'-0" DATE EDINA, MN 55436 7.9.2018 NAME: R. JONATHAN B. BARTLING I RACHEL L.H. BARTLING DATE 7.9.2018 DRAWN REGISTRATION NUMBER: 45621 145494 JBARTLING PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 n LE PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 1 6 2018 CITY OF EDINA VARIANCE DESCRIPTION: WHEN THE ORIGINAL HOUSE AT 5601 TRACY AVENUE WAS BUILT IN 1962, A PORTION OF THE GARAGE WAS BUILT EIGHT FEET AWAY FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE (SEE EXHIBIT A). THE CURRENT SET BACK IS TEN FEET, SO WE HAVE INHERITED A TWO FOOT SETBACK ENCROACHMENT. CURRENTLY APPROXIMATELY 74 SQUARE FEET OF THE EXISTING HOUSE SITS INSIDE THE TEN-FOOT SIDE-YARD SETBACK (SEE 1/A022). THE ROOF INSIDE THIS SETBACK IS APPROXIMATELY 18' TALL MEASURED FROM THE DRIVEWAY TO ITS HIGHEST POINT (SEE 21A022). THE EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAPHY, CREATED SOME AWKWARD PROPORTIONS ON THE FRONT ELEVATION (SEE WEST ELEVATION, 2/A022). OUR MODERNIZATION OF THIS 1962 SPLIT- LEVEL HOUSE SEEKS TO RECTIFY THESE ISSUES WHILE DEMONSTRATING THAT REUSE CAN BE A MORE FAVORABLE OPTION THAN A TEARDOWN. AS TWO EDINA RESIDENTS, WHO ARE ALSO ARCHITECTS, WE BELIEVE SAVING AN EXISTING RESIDENCE AND TURNING IT INTO A MODERN HOME EXEMPLIFIES A POSITIVE STEP TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE IN EDINA. WE ARE SEEKING A VARIANCE THAT WILL ALLOW US TO ADD USABLE SPACE ABOVE OUR EXISTING GARAGE WHILE FIXING THE PROPORTIONAL ISSUES AT THE SAME TIME. WE WILL BE BUILDING INSIDE THE INHERITED TWO FOOT ENCROACHMENT AND ONLY 74 SQUARE FEET OF THIS PROPOSED ADDITION WILL RESIDE INSIDE THE 10' SETBACK (SEE 3/A022 AND 4/A022). IF THIS VARIANCE IS APPROVED WE WILL ALSO BE REMOVING THE SOUTH OVERHANGS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AS A SECOND REQUEST, OUR PROPOSAL INCLUDES CANTILEVERING THE PROPOSED AREA TO BE BUILT OVER THE GARAGE 2'-0" TO THE WEST SEE 2/A023. THIS IS THE SAME DISTANCE OF THE EXISTING ROOF SOFFIT AS INDICATED ON DRAWING 1/A023. THE EXISTING WEST WALL OF THE GARAGE WILL BE MAINTAINED AS INDICATED ON 2/A023. THIS REQUEST ALLOWS US TO BREAK UP WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A MONOLITHIC FACADE, PROVIDE CIRCULATION FROM THE GARAGE LEVEL TO THE PROPOSED LEVEL WITHOUT ENLARGING THE GARAGE FOOTPRINT AND SAVE OUR EXISTING FIREPLACE AS DEPICTED ON SHEET 002. IT WILL ALSO CREATE A SIMILAR CONDITION TO THE NEIGHBORING HOUSE AT 5609 TRACY (SEE 001). 'NO NEW WALLS WILL BE BUILT INSIDE THE SETBACK AT GRADE *0 0 0 SHEET INDEX: 000 -RENDERING AND VARIANCE REQUEST 001 - PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE AND RENDERING 002 - GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN EXHIBIT A - EXISTING SURVEY EXHIBIT B - PROPOSED SURVEY Cl - SITE PLAN A021 - EROSION CONTROL PLAN 9 MILE GREET WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 2018-87 GENERAL PROVISIONS A022 - SITE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS A023 - ELEVATIONS A024 - SETBACK DIAGRAM it Local Faes120180707 5601 Tracy Construction Dra,inos bartEno5hoa.com.nrt EDINA VARIANCE APPLICATION RENDERING OF 5601 AND 5605 TRACY AVE - RETAINING WALLS NOT TO SCALE *0 0 1 PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 CORNER 5601 TRACY AVENUE - BARTLING HOUSE NEIGHBOR HOUSE - 5605 TRACY AVENUE NEIGHBOR HOUSE WITH CANTILEVER CONDITION - 5609 TRACY AVENUE PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 1 6 2018 CITY OF EDINA 7 40 2, COMM. NO. DATE 7.9.2018 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT NAME: R. JONATHAN B. BARTLING I RACHEL L.H. BARTLING DATE: 7.9.2018 REGISTRATION NUMBER: 45E21145494 GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN *002 PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 SCALE 1/4" = l'-O" DRAWN JBARTLING U 19.-3" 4'-111/2" 6 V p PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 16 2018 ST 0 ST CITY OF EDINA (.9 PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Survey for: JONATHAN BARTLING VERNON AVENUE / ELECT MH CB 944.80 5.18 S89'50'00"E 232.50 FENCE -.. 1.47 945.19 9 1 C 8 >MM. d.23.30 PN 99- LLI LAND SUFNEYDRS ELECT MH 352-45 ARLSON INC. ARLSON 6*- ah 931 39 35.6 9 4.41 \ - . . 932.95 • • A.9: • . 44 • • a w .5° AREA: LOT AREA = 20,312 sq.ft. HOUSE AREA = 2,364 sq.ft. SHED AREA = 127 sq.ft. DRIVEWAY AND WALK = 930 sq.ft. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS = 3,421 sq.ft. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE = 10.96% N' 34.11 "a' 0 2 N), EXISTING k' HOUSE #5601 EXISTING HOUSE #5605 //////,8;41////// 9.39 16. 936.55 0 437.44 937.75 938.24 937.413\ .938.27 1 x 938.42 938.33 x 9381.08 9379 \. 939.04 247.78 N89•50.04"W A \ x 940.81 DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES LARSON'S REPLAT I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my ' ect supervisio , and that I orn registered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. d thi a , 2017. Lor Co re, and Surveyor Minnesota ense No. 9018 *EXHIBIT A rn Co Or 8 941.264 PLANTER x 941.44 W I\ I WIRE Eltkt AREA \\ 941.15 PP 6. a 941.17 CARLSON & CARLSON, INC. LAND SURVEYORS Tele. No. (952) 888-2084 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 1 6 2018 CITY OF EDINA 943.03 8 BY • Denotes Iron Monument Found 0 Denotes Iron Monument Set SCALE: 1" = 20' 949.39 PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Survey for: JONATHAN BARTLING Cs= 944.80 BY La Co re, nd Surveyor Minnesota ense No. 9018 CARLSON & CARLSON, iNC. LAND SURVEYORS Tele. No. (952) 888-2084 7/20/2018 1:30.09 0/11 es120180707 5501 Tracy Consiruclion Drayfings JaartlIng@hga.conml F VERNON AVENUE a S89'50'00"E 14 igns 47.47 945.19 6 232.50 y39 32 .v39 s / 1, FENCE :$) ELECT MH up co O O (c' O VG '5.6 93 .35 .0cx xf' 6t.• A C, N c7, x 936.76 \\•\.1 93. / (A34.11 '7 /43" /2P' Z10 bas. :1. x632.95 \ay 93039 II 939.04 247.78 N89'50'04"W PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 1 6 2018 CITY OF EDINA SCALE: " = 20' • Denotes Iron Monument Found 0 Denotes Iron Monument Set roj 4,554.3:-//////9•84/////// N 937X9 x 940.81 N t II 4.41 N v` 11Y • • '5`• UY RE 945.96 x 943.60 1943.03 PLANTER AREA 941.15 943 0A_ PP N 4' 936.55 EXISTING HOUSE #5605 DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES LARSON'S REPLAT I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my ect supervisio , and that I am a registered land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I M, d thi -1•1 40 / do 2017. *EXHIBIT B 0 I 941.17 vi 7 181.7 ADDITION 937.75 of x 938.27 938.42 938.33 AREA: LOT AREA s 20,312 sq.ft. 2 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE 2 FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE IAND SURVEYORS 352-45 x 938108 F- 949.39 4. 9.39 EXISTING HOUSE #5601 ARLSON INC. ARLSON DATE SCALE 1" = 20.-0" 7.19.2018 DRAWN JBARTLING S89"50'00"E VERNON AVENUE (CSAH 158) CB / PP KEY NOTES:. < 1 NEW 4" HIGH CURB OR LANDSCAPE EDGE TO CHANNEL STORM RUNOFF ALONG EXISTING WALK TO DRIVEWAY < 2 NEW RAIN GARDEN (BOTTOM AT ELEVATION 937.0' WITH AREA = 87 S.F.), 3:1 MAXIMUM SIDE SLOPES. PROVIDE 12" DEPTH OF BIO-FILTRATION SOIL MIX B FOR BOTTOM (80% CLEAN WASHED SAND & 20% COMPOST). CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPCA STORMWATER MANUAL GUIDANCE. PROVIDE NATIVE PLANTINGS SUITABLE FOR RAIN GARDEN CONDITIONS . FIELD LOCATE WITH CITY APPROVAL UPON START OF LANDSCAPING WORK. JUL 16 2018 FROM THE SITE FOR THE 10-YEAR DESIGN STORM EVENT (0.1 CFS). THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME FOR THE 1.1" STORM EVENT FROM THE INCREASED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IS 0.002 ACRE-FEET OR 650 GALLONS. CITY OF EDINA *IF ANY RETAINING WALLS ARE OVER 4' IN HEIGHT A 3' SETBACK IS REQUIRED tLS 5' 5605 TRACYAVE NOTE: 1. ALL WORK MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT NO. 2018-87. 2. THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE NEIGHBOR AT 5605 TRACY AVE, AND IS NOT AWARE OF ANY STRUCTURAL FLOODING ISSUES. 3. PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG OR SILT FENCE AT EDGE OF DISTURBED SOIL TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT TO STREET OR NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MUST COMPLY WITH NMCWD PERMIT. Lu I.- o Nr §,T DR .6 SQOAR NEW RETAIN NG WALL e Gas Me/Ar 247.78 \ N89°50'04"W 553 SQUAREFEETj NEW IMPERVIOUS 5601 EXIST HOUSE AREA: 2,364 SQUARE FEET PART T/TX-S0 ...,CY0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9r FOR ROAD / 45' /ti'./ • 43 ". fah 183 SF Nk EXIST SIDEWALK:' ',77 SQUARE FEET OkE REMOVED ••••. REPLACE EXISTING RETAINING 190 SF NEW EXIST SIDEWALK: \ • ff — ••\ LT.-1 " 178 SF EXIST 232.50 FENCE (+— 4. RESTORE PLANTED AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION BY TILING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST LOT AREA = 20,312 SQUARE FEET (0.466 ACRES] 2-INCHES, PLACING AT LEAST 4" OF TOPSOIL, AND SEEDING OR SODDING AS SOON AS PRACTICAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA= 0.079 ACRES (17.0%) 5. THE 0.020 ACRE INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CREATES AN INSIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THE DISCHARGE PROPOSED ADDED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.020 ACRES 553 SQUARE FEET HOUSE ADDITION 190 SQUARE FEET DRIVEWAY ADDITION 183 SIDEWALK ADDITION -77 EXISTING SIDEWALK REMOVED 849 SQUARE FEET IMPREVIOUS AREA ADDED TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.099 ACRES (21.2%) I I I 1 1 EXIST SHED AREA: \ \ 127 SQUARE FEET ss• JY RE fw I 20' Elegy Metol PLANTER AREA -ov I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINES tINDER E LAWS OF'THE STATE OF MINNESOTA F1 a4 / /Or NAM NNETH{N. ORNS DATE: 07/19/2018 REGISTRATION NUMBER: 18235 SITE PLAN Cl PROJECT INFORMATION: BARTLING RESIDENCE 5601 TRACY AVENUE EDINA, MN 55436 COMM. NO. Date: August 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:1.3 foot s ide yard setback varianc e to the eas t s ide yard s etbac k and a 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the wes t property line at 5225 Divison S treet. Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Deny the 1.3 foot side yard setback variance to the east property line at 5225 Division Street. Approve the 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the west property line at 5225 Division Street. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he subject property, 5225 Division Street, is approximately 10,286 square feet in area and is located on the southeast corner of Rutledge Avenue and D ivision S treet. T he existing home on the lot is a two-story home built in 1959 with a side load garage. T he applicant is proposing a 1.3 foot side yard setback variance on the east property line and a 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the west property line for a two story addition to the existing home. T he existing home has non-conforming setbacks to the east and west property lines. T he proposed addition consistent with the setbacks of the existing home, but the addition area will not be on the same level of the existing first floor. T he proposed addition would sit almost 3 feet higher than the existing first floor. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Engineering Memo Aerial Map Applicant Submittal The subject property, 5225 Division Street, is approximately 10,286 square feet in area and is located on the southeast corner of Rutledge Avenue and Division Street. The existing home on the lot is a two-story home built in 1959 with a side load garage. The applicant is proposing a 1.3 foot side yard setback variance on the east property line and a 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the west property line for a two story addition to the existing home. The existing home has non-conforming setbacks to the east and west property lines. The proposed addition consistent with the setbacks of the existing home, but the addition area will not be on the same level of the existing first floor. The proposed addition would sit almost 3 feet higher than the existing first floor. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential.. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features 5225 Division Street is a two-story home built in 1959 with a side loaded garage. The current home does not meet the setbacks required in today’s code. The existing setback on the east property line is 4.7 feet instead of today’s required setback of 6 feet. The existing setback on the west property line is 27.1 feet August 15, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-18-19, A 1.3 foot side yard setback variance to the east side yard setback and a 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the west property line at 5225 Division Street. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 instead of the required 33.7 feet. The proposed building addition will partially sit on top of the existing garage and match the existing non-conforming setbacks on both the east and west sides of the property. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in their August 9, 2018, memorandum. The stormwater management plan associated with the project does not propose any drainage to neighboring private properties. The new and existing run-off associated with this project will be directed to Division Street and Rutledge Avenue, which have the storm utility capacity to accept new run off. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – East Side - South– West Side – 33.3 feet 6 feet 25 feet 33.7 feet 32 feet (existing) 4.7 feet* Roughly 75 feet 27.1 feet * Building Coverage 25% 21.42% *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the proposed variances justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing location of the home (built in 1959). The proposed addition is reasonable on the west side due to the lot having two required front yard setbacks, and the proposed addition not furthering the non-conforming setback on the west. Staff questions if the proposal is reasonable on the east side. Although the existing setback is 4.7 feet and is an existing non-conforming setback, the addition could meet the required 6 foot side yard setback requirement with the addition being slightly off set from the existing exterior wall of the home. The addition being offset would then meet the City’s sidewall articulation requirement for walls that exceed 30 feet. By denying the variance to the east side yard setback, the proposal would meet the design criteria of the City Code. 36-439 Special requirements. f. Sidewall articulation for a principal structure. In order to avoid the monotonous appearance of long, unbroken building facades from abutting properties, the length of an exterior side wall shall not exceed 30 feet without a) a minimum of at least a one-foot deep by ten-foot-wide offset (projecting or recessed) or b) a combination of at least two of the following architectural or utilitarian features within every 30 feet or less: 1. Structural windows, doors, awnings or canopies. 2. Projecting bay or box windows. 3. Stoops. 4. Porches. 5. Chimneys (minimum depth of one foot). 6. Balconies. 7. Pilasters. 8. Second story roof overhang (at least 20 percent of the façade length). 9. Port-cocheres (a roofed structure extending from the building over an adjacent driveway that vehicles drive through, typically sheltering those getting out of vehicles or as a passageway to a garage). 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The existing house has existing non-conforming setbacks on the east and west property lines. The proposed addition would continue the same non-conforming setbacks on both the east and west sides but the proposed addition, as designed, would not meet the City’s sidewall articulation requirement on the east elevation. STAFF REPORT Page 4 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance to the west property line will not alter the character of the neighborhood on the west side, but the request would not meet the sidewall articulation requirement on the east elevation. Recommended Action: Deny the 1.3 foot side yard setback request to the east property line and approve a 6.6 foot side (front) yard setback variance to the west property line at 5225 Division Street. Staff recommendation for the variance requests is subject to the findings listed in the staff report above and subject to the following conditions: • Subject to the applicant providing a survey and plans that reflect the variance granted. • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. Deadline for a city decision: September 14, 2018. DATE: August 9, 2018 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Charles Gerk, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5225 Division Ave - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include the existing conditions survey titled “Site Existing Rev1” and the proposed stormwater management plan dated 8/9/18. Grading and Drainage Grading for the proposed work will closely match existing grades. The proposed addition and remodel proposes approximately 175 sf of new impervious surface. The new and existing run-off will be directed to Division Street and Rutledge Ave with the use of controlled grades and swales. The proposed stormwater management plan does not propose any drainage to neighboring private properties. No mitigation is required for the new run-off as it does not trigger threshold requirement outlined in engineering policy document SP-003. Additionally, the storm utility has capacity downstream to accept the new run off. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved plan. Erosion and Sediment Control No Comments Street and Curb Cut A curb cut permit will be required if the applicant proposed replacing or relocating existing curb cut. Public Utilities No Comments O ther Items No Comments Edina, H ennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates 2013, HN Aerial 2015 5225 Division Street August 8, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 50 ft / Projects \ 2018 ProjectS111332- IGN - 5225 Division St- Hoongl5225 Division St Date: license Ner SITE LOCATION: SITE: HOANG RESIDENCE DRAWING INDEX: HOANG RESIDENCE PROJECT SCOPE: - INTERIOR REMODEL OF BASEMENT, MAIN FLOOR AND 2ND FLOOR - TWO STORY ADDITION OFF BACK OF HOME - MAIN FLOOR ADDITION INCLUDES NEW KITCHEN, LIVING ROOM, DINING ROOM AND SUN ROOM - 2ND FLOOR ADDITION INCLUDES NEW MASTER BEDROOM, BATHROOM AND CLOSET - TWO NEW STAIRS TO EXISTING DECK - UPDATED EXTERIOR - NEW FRONT PORCH GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FINISHES, MATERIALS, CABINETRY, AND EQUIPMENT WITH OWNER. 3. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL WORK TO CONFORM TO STATE AND LOCAL CODES. ADDITION TITLE Project number 1832 Date 6/19/2018 Drawn by TK Checked by PR PERSPECTIVE: PROJECT LOCATION: 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 No. 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 Revision Schedule VARIANCE Description Date (m) iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@lgreendesIgns.com www.lgreendesIgns.com Sheet # Sheet Name T TITLE A0.1 EXISTING - SITE A0.2 EXISTING - FLOOR PLANS A0.3 EXISTING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al SITE PLAN A2.1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A2.3 2ND FLOOR PLAN A2.4 ROOF PLAN A3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4 BUILDING SECTIONS PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUN 10 2018 CITY OF EDINA S TAFF I hereby certify Nat this Om aparakatlaa on ,!Part vara prepared by me or under my cereal supervision and that I are e duly Licensed Architect under the Lams dine Siete at. ARCHRECT SEAL Signature: Print Name co co N ED SITE - EXISTING 1" = 10'-0" 6(IC iGREENDESIGNSina 8101 34th Ave 5, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal lel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com twAvigreendesigns.com i her., certify ffiatthh pbst, spec:I-Kalion or report byunder, ,ruc-clsu and 3.11 am 1 a dB, Licensed Ar... . , E. Ille Aision Lara rd Ne St. or. ARCHITECT SEAL Signature' Print flame. ,,,,e, License!, HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule No. Description Date EXISTING - SITE Project number 1832 Date 8/9/2013 Dram by TK Cheoted by PR A0.1 DIVISION STREET 61.93 SETBACIS L 62 0 EXISTING HOUSE J 1-j DRNEWAY 33.7 ADJOINING HOUSE EXISTING SETBACK LINE RUTLEDGE AVENUE PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUN 1 ,C,P 2018 CITY OF EDINA 12' -10' 17-7314' -7' 17 .4, k 3.-11. e J) - DN S la 2'-8 7 2-0' 2'2'-3' ; ,r 2 ' -3",r-31 112' 11_ 4' 1 nate: License Na Revision Schedule Date Description Na. EXISTING 2ND FLOOR 1/4' =1'-0" EXISTING MAIN FLOOR 1/4" = V-0" EXISTING LOWER FLOOR 1/4" =1'-0" Checked by PR A0.2 nrS.NcS(X,:.V.X.'SCX > 6,87/3' I F X , :51 hereby certify that this pan, spar:Mamba or report vas prepared by ma or under my &act mMaa4a,do and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the Lava of the wale of. ARCHITECT DEAL S:ign:17: P Name: HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE EXISTING - FLOOR PLANS 18 Projocts11832 - IGN - 5225 Division St- Hoong1522 2-0' / 61: i<><.XXXX)MX.X:././..500SNY.XXX.CA>CXXI E. GARAGE 588 SF 11.-103/8" 7, :xXxl`x:‹ 11' AV& `W,•••>=)<`:<;<>N;(*Xx`,-<X,‘,.'X',,& -10' /E. BATH 31 SF 5'-3112' • t X Ilk 6 E. FAMILY ROOM 253 SF 2'-103/4' E. LIVING 313 SF r-6" 27-5172' 4'-112' CONC. SLAB ABOVE GARAGE E. MECH/ UTILITY 348 SF 4'-712' 1 ate 7 -6' 2-4 2.,..„r " r(41.--Th v40/ iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington. MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com www.igreendesigns.com PLANNING DEPARTMENT J UNE 2018 CITY OF EDINA 2P1 .'esLlae.lwee.ti=deClaaaded 2ND CEILING 9 15 - 10 1/2' Mini I "181E =MI RCM Virdinmra mai l'ArginurrulanliM "'WA 'HUM' ir'ES'iralfardraniVIENIN VIM° cidnumran milmillimum&in_mannummainnimannt mindramq iinntiVIRUMISINGINIEMMEMMICIVIL 11=1111 MIZINANIMMTHIMIMIATHINATIWRIiM Vaal .aii 1 I l LIVin111111111011 12111111111111111111111 111111111.1111111111112 nllrlltmm 1111m1111E71111.1111M11 miummironimn VaillfillIREPIDAVAINU ToiniErmilinnuctnincui INIMMINNOMMAIIMMI I I I tunnini 'RAW MOM' LIMN GARAGE CEILING 03 - 3" — MAIN FLOWLfti, \ LOWER CEILING 8. Qv' aRAI)E 11 1 I I 1- r Iii=1 I1=1ii,-111=111=1 I 1=1 1=111=11=111-11=1 — ,H-E-Frw-111-111-141—.11'-1117:111711171117 GAR, FLO OD_ LOWER Rpik -7' - 8' 'Jr 2ND FLOG- S'-"41/2" •-i" "--\ MAIN CEILING 03 T - 8 1/2" l 111 2ND FLO - 4 1/2" %JP' MAIN CEILING 03 7.- 81/2" ',Jr SOUTH EXIST 1/4"'=l'-O" ItairldlEln 1141111111r111711M111114111 11111W10114111114% 111i I 1 r- 11111111`11 II IBM lind u WO u . .1 - WI ENIMINIMIWIty 111712111118111 im. 111121211111111 LISIBIMITITILI111111 1 Ellifin1110,-- 1 gilliF ' ME fin 1211111111:41 n 11711111011 NI an 1111 111 21111 111 II" 11 UMW 1"11MIN I nsl I II Ma ; Will M I ilin MIK niewinniiiiRl111.111111111111111111M1 RIM.' minim 011111111111112111 11111111•111111111 rintionmiumiuummumniumminurinrin imaninnurn -mer--:: rari-rmoraracralwarm:ramcgras=:=Ine..,--amr-Imo. ail 1 ENIMMINNEININNEENIMININA ininz ririnumnrmmantimmammmonnziminffinirretruinuirt, --1 IIIIMMIMMONNIMIN MEE= i_i 1 _, ,firirfr,IFtari 1---rifithlrffILITFrTiuRmITthritulffithfrnthmilTMIT-TM 1-111-11:-141 111 111-1-1-1 11 1 WEST EXIST 1/4" = 1 -0 I put di i ===.6111 1 1 I _4_ IC I 11 181.1111114:4111411 2111111111111'1111M1111111 N1111111111111121111 11 pang 11.711 111 III It III SHAKE uhji 4 t I if I UU 111 1 1 1 111132121111111111121111111111 lakt1411111111111111111M11111? 111:117111KIN1111114111114111111 111111 111 ii11111111 ..1j1 j 1111 tY Ins 111 III 1 ij I I( 1 1 2ND CEILING Il 15' - 10 1/2" 1/4-11' P4.=/- -411111.Za wen 111911P11:14,111 11"119111:Irl "1114MMIHIIIIIIMMINVENg m Ims 0 11 It MI Me MIngr 1;711 ;' him wiraimumfat 11"441.1W=10411,4 vionamen.LIV` MIEN u ' ISK 1:Trii,441,1,;;Ps..a.447?,,,AWIi 111—HI` i_ I 1 1 1 1 71-11---±M=-11 =111=111=111=11-= 1=111± — 111=-111= 111==-111-L-7.11111E1IFI -1 -111 —I 1E11 IIII-11111 —_1iiniiHi 11'- 111111 JIII=1111 1111111111 1=11 11111I III11 1-111-111—'11111-111 usisisei nrarntu. 1111 OEM 1 2 AM 1111h11111 air illyhM11 I`na' II Ith stillirianzird.111111414111111111111111111111114119B1111 1 11 111111..rigpintimir..111111 rin~. 1111 rt,wifafrcmm"Nnnr*rmij.atvr;,..,r,r, "' • maw 11,74libw-§digiattir wite . ' ...INIMI#704PNVINIARN =IMMUNE minium manimanimniinniun trunirzfurnmmersur I • 'ovum I 'WM 1 1.111E1 --- 1-1117111=11t=11111-f1=11 -111=If1111=11t=111=tf1=111111=111=1[[=_11=-11H 11=111=11=1 =111=11=111=11=111=111=11=111=111=111=HHIHImi—iffm=mHil: -111-11-111-il —111-111— 11-111111-111-111-111-111-111— 11111-111-111. 1=111=111-_-_,HHHHH=111=111=111,111111=ww111=111=11=111=H111111.__i ruriruilH11111miiim111-1-H-11111111-111 III III MOO syn miii I II 111.111111111 1 11 1111411211 1 INI EAST EXIST NORTH EXIST 1/4" = 1.-0" 1/4' = 1'-0" 111111111111 m; &171. rau r rhAll its.1W6. 771 7 :1 igal:: r..j it i= H14 0L VIA , : j.,. ; ; ::; :;: .7 n ..,:,: r :„: . : :,.....i .i ,,7,„, L ,.. , , 11211121 ..---leil.e.srinnimi. nom rionnunntimmialamintralut • &1111111 minanns121.11111111111111111111111111A1 Mb. 11111111111111111211111221 111 1111111111111111srianin..-__-_-_-_,1 - - kV isirianiuMMElil•.omiiimil ormanic MUM I -M7*.q.-71-1111141111iNIENNEIVAIWS_MINM lial =1.111mitit‘VINZI 1111111111 11111111Imm smn111110 IR 1~nr hny it r.II to Iiiiimmel.-"aiiiii inianAcirrlirintnimieilifiimiliarciern inmihiiiiii iminumnin 1 It'uniliMili IIII. 111111112111411211111111 II RI ir lig " E. I ilonh ., mon 119 -.1112 TIT -.111111,22t2i2I 1 HT 111113211 Pillt 111111EU1111111111111%111 II1 II 11 GARAGE CEILING MAIN fLOOlk 1' - 3" 0" \-0' LOWER CEILING 03 -8" %JP = GRADE I-1 1- 1= 1=1 111 II! III I GE =11=11=1 1=111= 1 GARAG, =I IE--11110 -6-(1" -1-411111,7-1111 CI11,-7111;111111;7111:111E 'REI7 iGREENDESIGNSinc 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@1greendesigns.com www.lgreendesigns.com I hereby certify that Itis Nan, spedrIcadon °revert hes prepared by me or under my direct seaeredIed and that I arn a duly Licensed Architect under the Lees of Ne State of. ARCHITECT SEAL Signature: Print Name. Del License I:a HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule No. Description Date EXISTING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Project number 1832 Date 6/19/2018 Drawn by TX Checked by PR 0/121.1.110 "MAO= ANI A0.3 , Y 1GREENDESIGNSiaa 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com wmigreendesigns.com I hent, certify Eat Ns at...space-ern OI report ;7;1 1=7„%druVIL'arratt:C rnrilr Larx et the Seta of. ARCHITECT SEAL Snanet e. Niel Name license no- HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule No, Description Date SITE PLAN Project number 1832 Date 8/9/2018 Diann by TK Checked by PR Al EXISTING HOUSE • , • .• • DIVISION STREET 62 Ir 33.7 L 61.93 -D 1, SETBACK, f,, I [ ADJOINING HOUSE EXISTING SETBACK LINE RUTLEDGE AVENUE N SITE PLAN = 1g-0" COPYRIGHT 2014 It I LOWER FLOOR- DEMO PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" UP FAMILY ROOM 166 SF eitoxeero BEDROOM ALIGN 131 SF 11% 8 132 - 91/2' r-- 1 88 min TWO CAR GARAGE 587 SF 2Z5 X 2.V8 STORAGE 284 SF 111082311 5'•2114' BATH LOWER FLOOR 1/4" = 1'-0" MUD ROOM 88 SF 11'10X70/ n CLOS. ALIGN 0 f- HALL y r2ITSF - iq• / ALIGN UTILITIES UP LINEN =4 UP <`.;(''x'Sx,,%.,&:W>6?c,<'.:6-6-66.S666(',ZZScx,66.M6.?(,%56& vision - Hoong \ 5225 Division SL Rt‘IGO Projects \ 2018 ProJects11832 - IGN llow iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@lgreendesigns.com www.lgreendesigns.com !hereby cearry Nal Nis plan, speoEeeaon or Won was prepared by me or under my direct SapeMsun and that I an a duty UrAnsed Artheect under the Laws of le Stale of. ARCHTTECT SEAL Signature Print Name. 0-le License No HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule No. DesctiptIon Date LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Project number 1832 Date 6/19/2018 Drawn by TK Checked ley PR A2.1 I- PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUN 2018 CITY OF EDINA 13 -1 1'-1112' / s. I -11-7-11A7-* r- 4'-7 4. 3 / / • •ft;--r3 1:- 23 - 11 1t2,— DN 5,10' / b iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@Igreendesigns.com wmv.IgreendesIgns.com I hereby certify that tie plan, specification or report d by me or under my direct supereiston and and Nate a duty Lkensed Architect under the Laws of Me Slate of. ARCHITECT SEAL Signahre Print Name: Dales license Na HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule No. Description Date MAIN FLOOR PLAN Project number 1832 Date 6/19/2018 Drawn by TK Checked by PR A2.2 RAIGD1- Projools12018 Projects11832 - IGN -5225 Division St- Hoon015225 Dheision Si it 7-5' 12-7' PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2018 CITY OF EDINA 3 1/2' ON X PORCH-80 SF 7-512' 6.-9' UP FOYER 131 SF 1210 X80 OFFICE 111 SF 178 X9'0 ; C 6 I .1 'Lk SITTING ROOM 225 SF 12'10214'0 -L HALL 22 SF ALIGN WI EXISTING GUEST BED 119 SF 105X11'6 UP BATH 31 SFr- Dis.V REF 0, I 0, A 1.2-10-g -4"4._7" LIVING ROOM g KITCHEN 11'0x15.6 183 SF 'c 792 SF 174 X176 a 0 <; E 1 L 0 0 0 I N- r- ii C c EXISTING DECK i-- 01 ___ SUNROOM - 127 SF ,-- -11A8iikiG . . .145 $E 11roX13.2 -i 11'0 X 13'2 i PS MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1/4" =1'-0" MAIN FLOOR - DEMO PLAN 1/8" =1.-0" 2ND FLOOR - DEMO PLAN 1/8" = 11-0" Date: License No. DescdptIon Date No I hereby certify the this pan, speAr donor rePet vas prepared by me or under my etect cape ion and that I am a duly Ucensed ArcNtect under the Land of the Stale ol. ARCHITECT SEAL 9. Print Name: HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule 2ND FLOOR PLAN Project number 1832 Dale 6/19/2018 Dlawn by Author Checked by Checker A2.3 (M) 110"/ iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Kauko! tel: 952-826-2222 fax 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com www.igreendesigns.com PLANNING DEPARTMENT LIN 2018 CITY OF EDINA 4 4. .lire • t-. b' a BEDROOM BEDROOM 127 X 13'1 12'10X13'1ry LAUNDRY DN J8'0 X115 HALL I LOUNGE ' T 11'8 X11'5 u ‘. ! [BATH , . • .,:, ' M. LANDING ( : 44 SF MSTR CLOSET IL____, fro x4O _n___ 101 SF •.. 1710XTIO \ MASTER ` . - BEDROOM ; -' L t:, 222 SF 1511X142 II "- —= MS 9 2 BATH 92 SF . 1710 X -10.3 . c ) \.\ I ,..• '' . s s,...?. • • — . \ 7 -0' , 10.- 8 114- 7- 8 lie 7 41/4' \ .?•- 8' 8.- 8 314. : i X / .1' / 2V-11 in* NMI 2ND FLOOR 114.= 1.-0" RAIGD1- Prolacts12018 ProjectsV1832 - IGN - 5225 Division St • Hoang15225 Division St - Hoang.rvt RAIG0t- Projects12018 ProJects11832 - IGN - 5225 Division Sl- Hoang\5225 Division St- Hoong.rvt Dale: License No' Date 6/19/2018 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA JUN 1 2018 n ROOF PLAN 1/4" =1.-0" Date No. Description (1-4 iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave 5, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com worw.igreendesigns.com I hereby Certify Del this plan: specification of feport bee pepared by me or wider my Erect supervision and shall am a duty Licensed Archie. under the Lays of ye Stale of. ARCYSTECT SEAL Sig ares Print Name. HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule ROOF PLAN Project number 1832 Drawn by Author Checked by Checker A2.4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL 2018 1GREENDESIGNSirI0 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com www.igreendesigns.com NORTH 1/4" =1.-0" ADDITION 2ND FLOOR CEILING 19' -11 1/2" ADDITION 2ND FLOOR 11' -11 1/2" 0 CITY OF EDINA ASPHALT SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES `ADDITION 2ND FLOOR CEILING 19' - 11 1/2” Mil BIN ADDITION 2ND 11' - 11 1/2" \Jr SHUTTERS . ASPHALT • SHINGLES BOXED COLUMN ADDITION MAIN FLOOR - 11 1/2" I hereby cert/ that Ws plan, sPadtkann o+rePod nos prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the Lens of the Stale ol. ARCHITECT SEAL Ik 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I GRADE L1 AVG. GRADE L-11 L- i III-1 I r r 11_11 _11 _1 1_1 _11-111-1 1-111_11 — 1 -.7-111 -111-E __111_111:7-111=111--1117=111=1 —111-1,1111E1 1E1 =11 =1 1E111E1 — V_1 1 7111--=111_111=--111E111=11 E111-=-111E111= III-1 111 11=111=11 _= _= 11= — 111—I— --1111=— 1 I-III „ 17t111 .111- 111p 1t111 III——H1-1—I— _ 11 1 -,111-11H 11-41E11 7 .111=-,1111=111,111_=,--111=-111:111--=111111=1117-11=111,=111=111=111=1 11-111-1 11—;_,1117,=,1 Signattee. Print !Jerre. LIcense No- Date: O EAST 1/4"=I'-O' HOANG RESIDENCE ASPHALT SHINGLES ASPHALT SHINGLES ADDITION SHUTTERS . VINYL SIDING SAH= 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VINYL SIDING VARIANCE ROOF OVERHANG m FE] ELI Revision Schedule UIVIStOrt St Dale No. Description L_D 1-1-1 EXISTING GARAGE DECK BOXED COLUMN RN NI 4 d MWMCMME .17s, NEW STAIR & DECK HRH munur Mgr' ADDITION MAIN FLOOR 2' -11 1/2' EXISTING GARAGE DECK 111:1,11 lilt NEW I®®0 s, MUM =MIMI NEW GARAGE DOORS I I NEW GARAGE L DOORS GRA —1 ' 1—== E-1-11E1 HI -2' --0 111-111— 1=111=111=11H I 1-111=111=111=1= AVG GRAD 1 1— 1 1 —111=111=111=1 1=11 =111=111=1 1 \ • -4' -3" kw 1 -- 1 — 1-11 1 1--1-111=1-1I-1-m=1 Ali -111=111=111=1H1=111=111=1 El GAR GE E 11e 1=111 ET-,111:=111 =1 1=,111=7111111=,111,=111911111=,111,=7.1 , BOXED DECORATIVE COLUMN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS j -:„Ti-,-,-11f7T1'„:1T11E1 e,01,-,0191I7-10.9111„,11,t-111„",1V,IA„I,M,1,T, "El1141W"11Gifif_ Project number 1832 Dale 6/28/2018 TN Drawn by Checked by PR C) SOUTH WEST A3 1/4" •=1.-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" WA&Ntlited 0 0 0 0 0 , 1 till LOUNGE ADDITION 2ND FLOOR 11' -11 1/2" LIVING ROOM /SUN 4 iGREENDESIGNSinc. 8101 34th Ave S, Suite 110 Bloomington, MN 55425 Contact: Tressa Koukal tel: 952-826-2222 fax: 952-941-6515 email: tresssak@igreendesigns.com www.igreendesIgns.com I hereby certify that this plan, speolicalton or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the Laws at the State of. ARCHITECT SEAL S>gnartve Print Name' Date: License No: HOANG RESIDENCE ADDITION 5225 DIVISION ST, EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE Revision Schedule No. Description Date BUILDING SECTIONS Project number 1832 Date 6/28/2018 Drawn by TK Checked by PR A4 En en BEDROOM 632- IGN -5225 Division St H R: I GM- Projects \ 2018 Praia 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUL It 9 2018 CITY OF EDINA MASTER BEDROOM SITTING ROOM 111111PF _ — —111=11,1=11 — = 1-1111 iF;11111-11—T11111111-_1 11 11=1111111 1-[17_11 _ II-1 I I-1 _III, II= IIIII=11H-1 11= II= IIHII=111=111=1 —I I I—I I I I III ;III 111=111=I— I III— III —III— 1 I 1=1 =111=111=11111111111 11=111=111=11 I -11— II— III — 01--111 111 --1 MINIIIM=MM MO=UMM=ME ===111.1=1.II= r III IL,WP MMEMIWIIME MIMMOMMINI 1.11M= itmr Section 1 1/4" = I-0" - 4 1/2" Qt3_ 2ND FLOOR ANN FLOOR ADDITION MAIN FLOOR t1 2' - 11 1/2" \J. GARAGE SLAB 2' - 1 1/2 GRADE n AVG. GRAO_E, GA- -6' TINO. CONCRETE-/ •GE ROOF/DECK, ), roof -decic- iith-ritoirENY. . „ . . . 18.6fk- . , TO gord9 4.0 STEP STOOP 81) 9 . 0 -898.0 IMPLP \111.21.T:)., SI_IRF)\ LE_ - TEIT));1 r rr PLAN FtuiLL-tutti-st Pt ;ti irrJ MAIN LUL/- ELAN X i Iii MAIN I'LMLI-1 PLAN REFI- ItIE \-1 TODPS PLti:',,t,1,4 1.11 I ,,-,i IIs s I I • BEFCE.j.IT by 07, 1L J M) A a al ro 0 V co co ES z co o 0 NN VNI 03 rn NOISIAIU 5355 ONVOH RHS 9EVS5 NW VNIG3 1102 CI3NV(3311d dKW Ja28IS NOISIAIU S I _ E PLAN BUILDING ADDITION PORCH ADDITION 5225 DIVISION STREET, EDINA MN ws - El 0 co No ) _ _ I _ RPACL C.4,1 CH ES ° 62..00a 268'54!09" 1:!?•- lw 1275' MIES 1 1. OBSERVABLE UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE SHOWN; ALL OTHER UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN 2. THIS SURVEY SHOWS NO MARKINGS FROM ANY 811 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE / MARKUP FOR THIS SITE. 3. THIS SITE WAS LAST OBSERVED ON DECEMBER, 2017. 4. DIRECTION OF LINES ARE ASSUMED BEARINGS. 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE NGVD29 DATUM 6. PLANNED DRAINAGE DIRECTION/GRADE > 2.00% 7. PLANNED CONTOUR LINE 8. EXISTING CONTOUR LINE 5. LAND MARKERS FOUND OR SET NEW BY THIS SURVEY IRON PIN MONUMENT FOUND () IRON PIN MONUMENT SET AND STAMPED RLS 23266 27.1ft MAIt,',I':FLCIOR 9011ft , 74 - 4'4 NNM U flit ri APE4S SO sqt- - "7'7' HMI END FLE -0 triVII.PHANu 120 - ITT rt.111 .1P !..FYEL ui 89-5.0 897.0o, s-- as L 11; I /, 0 61.93 268'54'09" 33.7 ---\J1.1nD FrELit7.7 iThi LT; . _ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NAME: JAMES MICHAEL BR DELL, / fi (.7, I ;1 SIGNATURE ,:;/(7-4U-'-ji. 1)146 2/DATE 0/ 1 (--"" Professiorial Land SUfveyor, Minnesota License IN°. 23266 Eirm Name: State Engineering & Surveying Inc. • r This certification is lim ited to SITE PLAN. The certification is hereby revoked and void for unauthorized copies, when this document is in possession of parties other than the customer, agent, or authorized parties. Do not rely on unauthorized copies, which may be fraudulent, incorrect, erroneous, misleading, or omitting important and relevant information. This document is copyrighted and intended for a specific use during a specific time period. r,rc . ..... . • H • — .. . 1 `-..---,--i • • W CI • . . 2,- 1- 7'V- 1- ---,7, 03;;'FIT!---.-'''.- --,--,\•,!_.2,--,--", . _,-,,,-,--1\ t!----,---',, '''..—'--, ' , --,-----, 1 . . ... . ' -- --. - --- . . .. ' 61.93 2E654'09' __ XXX 113SIA3N Li H 5225 DIVISION STREET, EDINA MN SITE EXISTING 1232LLS NOISIAIO 5NS DNV011 DHL 0 roL to co n co m ID !13.!•!!1_ Lai LI, ET,riKiii.(":.'TfIF TERRI:ALP - " -• '1 62.00 26854',09" 2ND • Tfl!H L'') in- • (1‘ 1 , ! - , .! !!!--!: MAIM FLOOR 901,1ft NOTES 1 1. OBSERVABLE UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE SHOWN; ALL OTHER UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN 2. THIS SURVEY SHOWS NO MARKINGS FROM ANY 811 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE / MARKUP FOR THIS SITE. 3. THIS SITE WAS LAST OBSERVED ON DECEMBER, 2017. 4.. DIRECTION OF LINES ARE ASSUMED BEARINGS. 5. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE NGVD29 DATUM 6. EXISTING CONTOUR LINE 7. CONTROL POINT © 8. LAND MARKERS FOUND OR SET NEW BY THIS SURVEY • IRON PIN MONUMENT FOUND 0 IRON PIN MONUMENT SET AND STAMPED RLS 23266 - -27:1 NOTES 2 *l_AFfrErF ANTER 1. FEMA FIRM MAP PANEL 0361F NO 270160 INDICATES THIS PROPERTY IS • , 1 NOT IN A FLOOD ZONE. Li WILL]I.-ENLF IS In] TY 1_11 LII I !ILL I -----Ni\-4 I-HLF FiN LOT LINE --7,- 0 10 20 30 %;s°67 !c!!, T,Y': .= ;E• 7 ... _ 332 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAME OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NAME: JAMES MICHAEL.-BRIDELL, R.L.S. , j V SIGNATURE-! DATE 01 ; Professional Land Surveyor, Minnesota :License / No. 23266 \,2 Firm Name, State Engineering & Surveying Inc. This certification is limited to EXISTING SITE MAP. !'),P,. ,L), 1-'!! TIILAI 1._ UT HflU.:A) fli1P.^,17,E !,)11.)DI; e0.5 7 .!7• V 1- P 1!_l!'!,1 TTTE • 47C .122 A.'10 API The certification is hereby revoked and void for unauthorized copies, when this document is in possession of parties other than the customer, agent, or authorized parties. Do not rely on unauthorized copies, which may be fraudulent, incorrect, erroneous, misleading, or omitting important and relevant information. This document is copyrighted and intended for a specific use during a specific time period. //' I U I 0 rACE 94; STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5225 DIVISION STREET, EDINA M/ GZ o Frio "6, -4.„ 03 moo. L5, • o 0 to to o or 0 a Is 11/4. NH VNIG3 ru n's z O (0 49 O ONVOH 1332115 NOISIAIO ;Fn 2301 G322Vd32id LEIC:(1.1L 1-J.E.,zCTE:TE .93 4 14ANIAGLE C.13'25 H \ L_ I LEiT 2h 2P717K 7:IDF TFPP:--2 552.1 CATCH LANA 14444I-CLE COVES ANAl ?,-STEP Ij ( , EXISTING 0 STOREY HOUSE N 5225 mAllt UR 9IMASt NOTES 1. OBSERVABLE UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE SHOWN; ALL OTHER UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN 2. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE NGVD29 DATUM 3. PLANNED DRAINAGE DIRECTION AND GRADE % 2.007. 4. PLANNED CONTOUR LINE 5. EXISTING CONTOUR LINES. E4,4 r7,1-4 6. LAND MARKERS FOUND OR SET NEW BY THIS SURVEY IRON PIN MONUMENT FOUND 0 IRON PIN MONUMENT SET AND STAMPED RLS 23266 A "-', U MPERV IOU S 'ail i= ACE ARTA:, c TOTALLOT HOUSE GARANI R LEL DRIVEWAY PAVERS WALK STOOP rET PERCENT 10,2136 100.00 77E. 7.5.4 02, 7.23 478 4.05 483 4.10 292 190 49 248 TW AL LXIS1 !NC; Si IMPLRVIOUS 2882 STEP STOOP 8§9.O ePe" co vim Uta <il Or 0 895.0 TRrE °TREF: CIFRCE• 61.93 268'54'09' FLOOR IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS ,7.,c TOTAL LOT PLAN EUILDING r2OT2P1NT PLANNED SITE MAIM FLOOR PLAN ER HDU SE 1U REt• AIN PORCH PLAN DR.I\WAY EX GARAGE ROOF TO REMAIN NEY WALKS (73) NEW :STEP'S/STOOPS LX WALK ',Li PE%1AIN TOTAL :ITE T;.IREFA(10m= nc; is APF 'A PE REF N 10,22E 100.00 1855 - 13.07 H4,9 8.25 770 7.54 0.77 N/A N/ 333 3.24 N/A NiA IR5 1.22 N/A 2[E)-P, 21.02 10 20 30 Scale IA rep , ,,,,,,,,,,, , ....... „ .. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NAME: JAMES MICHAEL B529ELL, P.E. /4-- ProfessiOnal Engineern4innesota License Nol. 23266/ Firm Name: ;State Engineering & Surveying Company This certification is limited to STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET 1 OF 1 only. The certification is hereby revoked and void for unauthorized copies, when this document is in possession of parties other than the customer, agent, or authorized parties. Do not rely on unauthorized copies, which may be fraudulent, incorrect, erroneous, misleading, or omitting important and relevant information. This document is copyrighted and intended for a specific use during a specific time period. /I Ii °3 ytt t.-11/=' Oa two) DBE shirt 17.-0fir 5005165. a-rca ••) OW ICAC -WOO VOL 0•SMar MI... (AL' MGV/ rrAa. 0.0 1.f.1.0.141. NW. ul• how.) too fr -a 111/6 OF was 00•113 1.1.1.11‘1. MA.= 10.04.0 ./ MIER nom me) elFT PROTECTION PfalifOOMFh FROFION BARRIER SHROUD ,r DIA Pat: Eiti„FT PROTECTICH PERFORMED EROSCN BARRER 2=1 He torrn (net e eel to) FRAy& vas'too Tr es _.0 2vu ..011. Vg.n. t r ..0.11.0 001 Iiia cavo ac' TMv a®rvur a MC. 10100.019 PI MONO 01 KO11.1.1.11.1 POO 10317 11.110147 "V' 70 12.0II 107 RIDlay. a,ar 14 ors 400 1.7 *0 AG 01:6. C.11 ek AVMS VICO 0.1171 7, O. me 1=0/ IMO S-CP MOM 1:IVC 11•0.41 MT.. NO nOt 1,64 tom co Mer evn)C49. 110. NO YON= 11.0.10O.T. - KATZ 21.V.I. - n) 01 0.01 T. teas no lava ih.) mom. ret OMR,. 10.1.41 LOOM Or MICA OM rO sex wawa. FRIYOPAI CON1R01 FFNIEF This certification is limited to EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHEETS 1 OF 2 AND 2 OF 2. The certification is hereby revoked and void for unauthorized copies, when this document is in possession of parties other than the customer, agent, or authorized parties. Do not rely on unauthorized copies, which may be fraudulent, incorrect, erroneous, misleading, or omitting important and relevant information. This document is copyrighted and intended for a specific use during a specific time period. NAME: JAMES \ MICHAEL BRIDELL,• R. E r'• . . • • • i1,yi ) ) CJ 1,„" SIGNATURE r tit!, DATE ' ProfessionEngineer, Minnesota License NO. 23206 Firm Namej State Engineering & Surveying Company L tcs 0 0 CO IU CO irI -9ft IU EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SPECIFICATION SCHEMATICS NOTES 5225 DIVISION STREET, EDINA MN xxx a3sin3a ONVOH OHS 9EG5 NH vIli43 13381S NOMAD] SNS 230,t1 032R/d3I1d EiD EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will be an addition to the rear of the existing house above the existing garage; a new porch will be added to the front of the existing house. The project's building footprint will be slightly greater than the existing building footprint. Minor grading is required for new steps and walkways. Plan grading will direct storm water away from the building, then to Division Street and Rutledge Avenue. Henceforth, these waters will flow to a single catch basin at the southeast quadrant of said Division and Rutledge. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT AREAS The current site is residential land one-fourth acre in size. This lot contains a two-story house with attached garage along Rutledge Avenue. Relief across the site is five feet dropping westward. The lot is predominantly grass yard with scattered frees. Neighboring houses adjoin this property to the east and south. Open natural water is beyond 500 feet of this site. SOILS A subsurface investigation (sail report) was not prepared for this site. A review was made of the "Surficial Geology of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area"map published by Metropolitan Council Regional Planning Agency 2007, author Gary N. Meyer. It reveals this site to be underlain by Wisconsinan glacial deposits; New Brighton Formation, consisting at this site as lake clay and silt generally less than 15 feetthick. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES Control of silt-laden storm water runoff is accomplished by (1) adding a temporary rock construction entrance to the site (if the City of Edina demands this entrance to be a part of the project- verify with City before construction begins), (2) adding silt fencing (or equivalent rolls), and (3) adding inlet protection (see schematics on this sheet) to the one existing catch basin shown on the SITE PLAN SHEET at the northwest corner of the lot. PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL At substantial completion of the project, place place sod across the site in areas of disturbed grass and soil; underlay sod with replacement topsoil. MAINTENANCE OF THE CONTROL MEASURES Control measures MUST be maintained throughout the construction permit duration and until exposed soil is stabilized with sod. Erosion prevention maintenance MUST include regular visual inspection of the control measures, to guarantee the measures are working properly as called for by this erosion control plan. NOTES A. All erosion and sediment control materials materials shall meet MnDOT approved materials. B. Add temporary mulch (straw or hay or wood chips) on exposed soil not ready for permanent seeding or outside of the seeding dates to achieve 90 percent coverage for temporary soil stabilization. C. Concrete, paint, stucco and other washout construction materials: All liquid and sold waste washout construction materials for construction activity must be managed on NPDES and SDS construction stormwater permitted sites.See MPCA guidelines for such activities. D. Winter construction: Erosion and sediment control is required during winter construction; snowmelt is stormwater runoff and must be treated accordingly. Prevent pollution from running off the site during winter by 1) stopping land disturbance during freezing weather, 2) stabilize exposed soil with vegetation, mulch, or blankets before the ground freezes. All exposed soil must be stabilized if no land disturbing activity has occurred more than 14 days, including winter days. E. Remove inlet protection during freezing weather to prevent flooding and damage to snowplows. Re-install inlet protection during non-freezing weather. F. Stock pile of topsoil shall be placed outside of the limits of excavation and within the boundaries of the project site. See the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan drawings for available areas for stockpiling soil. G. All onsite vehicles and equipment must minimize compaction of the onsite soils. Construction activity must remain within the silt/or fiber roll fenced area, H. Remove temporary erosion and sediment control measures at completion of the project. .a17 . 61•VIN- MC. as 0.1101F MOM Mr. + nor eo fou °mew Geom. .in. zit' (Mo ai) um maths MN,nitlemazi FADRAtfCE AT ACCESS ROW EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATION GUIDELINE The specifications for erasion and sediment control herein MUST conform to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA; STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION; 2018 EDITION SILT FENCE OR FIBER LOG Silt fence are according to MNDOT 3886. Fiber log are according to MNDOT 3885 ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS. Perimeter erosion control can be either silt fence or fiber log as approved by City of Edina. INLET PROTECTION Storm drain inlet protection is according to MnDOT Standard Specifications and the followings Storm drain inlet protection consists of devices preventing sedimentation from entering underground drainage systems. Storm drain inlet protection applies to manholes, catch basins, curb inlets, and other drop type inlets constructed for ingress of surface water runoff into underground drainage systems. The Contractor must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices prior to soil disturbing activities, which may cause sediment laden storm water runoff to enter inlets. The Contractor must provide effective storm drain inlet protection during the construction permit duration, and until all surfaces discharging sediment to inlets are stabilized (for example, using sodding). The Contractor is responsible to prevent/minimize potential unsafe erosion and sediment runoff, flooding, other silt and water runoff problems. Prevention devices MUST be regularly cleaned out; devices MUST be placed to eliminate and prevent vehicle driver hazards/obstruction, The Contractor shall inspect with regularity the prevention devices, to remove sediment from storm drain inlets, and replace damaged protections before the next rainstorm. Removal and disposal of trapped sediment from inlet protection devices is a part of the construction permit. Site generated sediment that impairs/plugs drain inlets is contractor's responsibility to remove impairment at no cost to the City. FILTER BAG INSERT Filter bag with Frame inserts shall consist of a replaceable reinforced filter bag suspended from a retainer ring, or frame that fits within a grate frame. The filter bag shall be constructed of a polypropylene filter geotextile fabric with a minimum weight of 222 g/m2 [4 ounces per square yard), a minimum flow rate of 5908 L/minute/m2 [145 gallons per minute per square foot], a minimum permittivity of 2 per second, and designed for a minimum silt and debris capacity of 037 m3 [2 square foot). The filter bag shall be reinforced with an outer polyester mesh fabric with a minimum weight of 222 g/m214 ounces per square yard]. The filter bag shall be suspended from a galvanized steel ring or frame, conforming to ASTM-A36 utilizing a stainless steel band and locking clamp. The frame shall be designed with an overflow feature to prevent any pending between scheduled cleanings and replacement of the filter bag. Overflow capacity shall be at a minimum equal to the design flow capacity of the structure's grate opening. (OPTIONAL) TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE - IF REQUIRED BY THE CITY -VERIFY The rock used for gravel pads should be 2 to 3-inch size such as MnDOT CA-15 or CA-25 coarse aggregate. The aggregate should be placed in a layer at least 6 inches thick. The rock entrance should be at least 50 feet long. A filter fabric must be placed under rock when deformable CL type clayey soil subgrades are present, to prevent downward movement of gravel Into the clay with deterioration of uniform entrance pavement. Place a berm on this entrance as shown on the schematic, to prevent sediment-laden water from over-flowing into the street; and to allow vehicles to pass over the berm onto the rock entrance. STREET SWEEPING Tracking dirt onto public roads during hauling and general day-today construction requires periodic mad sweeping. Scraping and vacuum assisted sweeping or combination may be necessary. Power brooms or "sidewinder" devices are not acceptable sweeping methods. For the duration of the project, the construction entrance MUST be maintained to prevent/minimize tracking of dirt outside the project limit Length of gravel construction entrance shall be at least SO-ft for full width of roadway. Any sediment tracked onto streets MUST be kept clean by the Contractor; sediment MUST he removed within 12 hours of noting such. If Contractor fails to remove tracked sediment from streets, City may remove such at Contractor's expense. SOD/SEEDING Grass and ground disturbed area must be stabilized; Sod/seed and mulch as soon as possible after disturbance, for optimum seed germination and seedling growth. TURF ESTABLISHMENT Sod/seeding MUST be provided for this project and procedure far sod/seeding shall be according to MnDOT Specifications 2575,3876,3877 and 3878. The work MUST include replacement of all disturbed grass and ground. Blend new sod into existing grass/sod smoothly. Maintain all sod/seed areas for 90 growing days from date of installation_ Maintenance includes watering, weeding, fertilizing and mowing to establish the new turf, and to create adequate new roots. Rare spots persisting after three weeks of growing weather MUST be re-cultivated and re-seeded - as many times as needed - until good turf is established. Good turf contains no erosion washes, no bare spots greater than 0.5 square feet, no bare areas mare than 0.5% of any 1,000 square foot area, no deformation of turf areas caused by mowing or equipment Contractor MUST provide labor and equipment to water the turf restoration areas for duration of maintenance period, and until stabilization is achieved. Watering MUST BE provided throughout growing/maintenance period. Growing days are between April 1S and November 1. If the maintenance period does not end by Nov.1, remaining balance begins April 15 following year. Uniform surface grading MUST be established, not allowing depressions or rises, to allow safe mowing. Topsoil MUST be placed to at Mast 6" thickness for seeding/sodding. Rake/remove all topsoil lumps and irregularities prior to placing sod/seed. Removal of such irregularities is incidental to topsoil placement. Topsoil MUST be encountered/placed stiff enough to prevent footprints deeper than 1 inch, and loose enough to disallow footprints less than one-eighths inch deep. iiitt....BIaltitSEL5Bliat vc a ss Y) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. . . TING-CONCRETE ROUE/BECK. • IN RETE ZRIVEWAY TD REMAIN 898.0' TREE /1 TO Z 0 NOISIAIG SZZS 9CVGG NH VNIG3 133'd1S NOMAD] 5515 ONVOH nILL 81/60/8 HMEW 1:13SM3N EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE PLAN 5225 DIVISION STREET, EDINA MN MANHOLE COVER CATCH BASIN HA131401_E COVER o LT!-J,`.! ,--r.il' I 11 -1['''. -:.,11-'1,,,,_ . L.' 1 f,": r''. FITT V. T1 __ _,_, I 3 , '<_ .. 895.0 co NOTES 1. OBSERVABLE UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE SHOWN; ALL OTHER UTILITIES, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN 2. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE NGVD29 DATUM 3. PLANNED DRAINAGE DIRECTION AND GRADE 7; 2.007 > 4 . PLANNED CONTOUR LINE 8-gr-. 5. EXISTING CONTOUR LINES. --63''.0 -- 6. LAND MARKERS FOUND OR SET NEW BY THIS SURVEY IRON PIN MONUMENT FOUND 0 IRON PIN MONUMENT SET AND STAMPED RLS 23266 STEP STOOP 6.2 ID zo So . 11 SILT FENCE DR FIBER ROLL /F1 ING DEPARTMEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT MTN i. 2018 V I . 141 •yy 511-EST VIEW t PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUN 1 9 2018 CITY OF EDINA _410 - •-140 . ?CO - Or'v • int 0011 k 11 III Ila MIN 10010 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUN 11 2018 CITY OF EDINA STEVE:T viENO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA 'TT VIEW S Lu Z. 2 cc a. Ff.) LU / . * , 1 ' - ( • . '4'.. ift, 91 lk I .4r's ',. ..°4 ''..r7("'?•-• .7: lc,: • Pa"C41. •' • ' • 7Z: ''' • • — -.'';:•--7.--7-',47.:, - • Srtowarico 14Nciarki PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7i 2 0 18 CITY OF EDINA Date: August 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:S ketch P lan - 7200 & 7250 F ranc e Dis cus s ion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No Action R equested. P rovide the applicant non-binding comments on a potential future re-development proposal for 7200 and 7250 F rance Avenue. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached review memo. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Memo Sketch Plan Propos al Location Maps AFO Review August 15, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Sketch Plan Review – 7200 & 7250 France Avenue Information / Background: The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop 5.2 acres of land west of France between 72nd Street West and Gallagher Drive. The existing office buildings and parking ramp on the sites would be removed. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. As proposed, at full build out, the site would include: 7200 France – A 6-7 story 149-unit apartment, 14 rental townhomes, and 10 for- sale townhomes (173 units); with 13,000 s.f. of retail on France Avenue. 7250 France – A 6-7 story139-unit apartment with 8 rental townhomes (147 units); with 16,000 s.f. of retail on France Avenue. Each building would have 2 levels of underground parking. The Site Plan includes a north south woonerf as discussed in the Greater Southdale Framework as the western promenade. This area provides an improved transition to the property to the west (it would be roughly 95 feet wide). A row of 2-3 story for- sale townhomes is proposed on the west side of the woonerf. Shared connections from France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. Pedestrian paths on all sides of both buildings. At grade townhomes that would have street level entrances to 72nd and the new woonerf to activate the pedestrian areas. STAFF REPORT Page 2 A 48-foot setback from the paved portion of France & 25 feet from Gallagher. (These should be revised to 50 feet to France and 30 feet to Gallagher per the Southdale Framework.) The applicant is proposing to comply with the City’s Affordable Housing Policy including providing 20% of the total units within the project at 60% AMI. (Up to 64 units.) The Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The applicant has responded. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson has also provided a review of the proposed project. (See attached.) To accommodate the request the following is required: Comprehensive Plan Amendments to increase density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 65 units per acre; and A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Flexibility through the PUD would be requested would be for setbacks and height. As with all sketch plan reviews; the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus should be on the proposed land use, the appropriateness of the proposed development on this site, with a focus on the proposed density and building height. The building height of the 6-7 story area on the France side is 81 feet tall. The west side is 72 feet tall. The 5-story portion of the apartments is 61 feet. The 3-story townhomes are 37 feet tall. The height overlay district for this site has a maximum height limit of 4 stories and 48 feet. See the Zoning Ordinance Compliance table on the following page. STAFF REPORT Page 3 COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning: City Standard (POD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Front – 72nd Front - Gallagher Drive Side (west) • 2-story townhomes • 5-story apartment R-1 property setback 81 feet (based on height) 61-75 feet (based on height) 61-75 feet (based on height) 37 feet (based on height) 61 feet (based on height) Two times the height from R-1 for 5-6 story building = 122-150 (based on 75-81 feet) Four times the height from R-1 for 7 stories = 324 feet (Based on 81-foot building height) 40 feet* 30-40 feet* 30-50 feet* 100 feet 95 feet 248-314 feet 444 feet Building Height Four stories and 48 feet 6-7 stories and 81 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.00% 1.8%* Parking Stalls 640 enclosed (residential) 145 retail = 785 Total 792 proposed Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ *Not code compliant Flexibility through the PUD would be requested for building height, setback and FAR. PUD The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; STAFF REPORT Page 4 c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposed project would incorporate several of the items noted above. Elements that are included would be affordable housing, collaborative development with the property to the north, high quality building design, an increase in public realm/open space, pedestrian oriented design, and improved access. The existing parking ramp at 7250 is in a very poor state of repair. The density proposed and height is generally consistent with densities and height contemplated as part of the greater Southdale area study; with higher density in between France and York, and lesser density on the edges. The trade-offs in allowing more height and density include: A more creative site plan with improved site circulation and public space; Collaborative design with both parcels. The plan allows access for the 7200 parcel to take traffic away from 72nd and the low density residential area to the north and west; Underground and hidden parking; Improved pedestrian and vehicle access and connections; Affordable housing in the development; Pedestrian and bicycle oriented design would include bike and pedestrian paths through the site to connect to the north and along France and Gallagher. STAFF REPORT Page 5 The amendments to the Comprehensive Plan could be accomplished as demonstrated below. This would follow the general direction of the City Council, which was to just increase density on just these site’s and the remainder of the OR District to be considered in the overall update of the Comprehensive Plan. As a comparison of density; the following table represents densities in other Edina multi- family residential developments: High Density Development in Edina (Red – Indicates recent projects) Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher-intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway-oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre The property at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue or legally described as Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota, and the North 325 feet of the east 520 feet of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter except road may have a density up to 65 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units on the site shall be dedicated for affordable housing at 60% or less of area median gross income, for a minimum of 15 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. STAFF REPORT Page 6 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 Guitar Center Site 3650 Hazelton Road 186 150 Proposed 7200 & 7250 France 320-334 65 6500 France – Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52 5000 France 5000 France 23 29 The Collaborative Market Street 131 46 Gateway Point (Envi Edina) 66th & York 191 96 The Millennium 66th & York 372 60 TRAFFIC A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. The study should include an analysis of the housing density increase, which would replace allowed retail space. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN The applicant should provide greater detail in the sustainability of the project. LEED principles should be pursued and the sustainability questionnaire shall be filled out. WATERSHED DISTRICT The proposed plans would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. City of Edina Sketch Plan - 07.30.2018 FRANCE AVE. MIXED USE 7200 & 7250 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 2 Table of Contents Contents Introduction Table of Contents A Key Crossroads Vicinity Map Current Site Conditions Site Analysis - Zoning Site Analysis - Land Use Bike Paths Nine-Mile Creek Regional Trail Sketch Vision Southdale Height Study Panorama Topography Size Comparison Survey Existing Conditions Proposed Development Masterplan Stacking Diagram Site Data Site Plan Circulation Diagrams Floor Plans Model Views Sun Studies Aerial View Looking South Architect 333 Washington Avenue N, Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Design Team Owner/Developers 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 18 21 24 25 26 27 28 30 38 48 Landscape Architect 530 N 3rd St., Suite 120 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Civil Engineer 4931 West 35th St, Suite 200, St Louis Park, MN 55416 Site 7200 & 7250 France Avenue S.FRANCE AVENUEFrance Equities LLC CPEC EXCH 39560/61 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 3 • Low density • Separated building uses • Car-dependent • Inefficient • Exclusive and isolating From To • Sensible higher density • Mixed-use, “total lifestyle” • Highly mobile; walking, biking, driving (and being driven) • Inclusive and connecting • Sustainable and connected to nature • A next step for existing residents to move to... • ... and new residents to join the Edina community France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 4 Vicinity Map Vicinity Map Gallagher Drive Looking West W 72nd Street Looking West France Avenue Looking South France Avenue Looking North Site 9-mi Creek Regional Trail Edina Promenade/Bike path France Ave S Hwy. 100 & 62; I-494 Key N Site Description The project site is composed two parcels along France Avenue South: Site A is the 7200 France Ave South on the west side of France Avenue S which is 152,751 sf/3.51 ac and is currently occupied by a blighted office building with surface parking and a natural tree grove to the west. Site B is the 7250 France Ave South on the west side of France Avenue S which is 73,079 sf/1.68 ac and is currently occupied by a blighted office building and two level parking structure. The project comprises the ‘missing link’ in an extensive network of pedestrian walkways and vehicular access points, as well as a center point in Edina’s primary com- mercial corridor between Highway 62 (Crosstown) on the north and Interstate 494 to the south. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 5 Current Site Conditions 2. Existing Building at 72001. France Avenue Looking South 4. Existing Parking Structure at 7250 5. Existing Building at 7250 6. France Avenue Looking North 3. Existing Surface Parking N 1 2 3 4 5 6 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 6 R-1 R-2 PRD-4 PCD-3 POD-1 PUD PSR-4 MDD-6 Key - Zoning Site Analysis- Zoning Zoning per City of Edina N Sec. 36-578 (POD District) (1) Maximum building coverage: 30 percent of the tract. (2) Maximum floor area ratio: 0.5 percent of the tract. (3) Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract: Front Street: 35 feet* Side Street: 35 feet* Interior Side Yard: 20 feet* Rear Yard: 20 feet* (4) Maximum Building Height POD-1: HOD-4, 4 stories or 48’, whichever is less Sec. 36-579 Special Requirements In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter, the following special requirements shall apply: (1) Increased setbacks. The front street or side street setback shall be increased to not less than 50 feet when the principal use is located across the street from an R-1 district used for resi- dential purposes. When the Planned Office District is an integral part of either a Planned Industrial District or a Planned Commer- cial District, the front street setback and the side street setback shall be not less than those prescribed for the major district. (2) Proximity to R-1 district. The following minimum distance shall be provided between the closest point of the office building closest to an R-1 district and the nearest lot line of an R-1 district used for residential purposes: 5-6 stories - Twice the building height of the office building 7-8 stories - Four times the building height of the office building 9 or more stories - Six time the building height of the office build- ing (3) Building design and construction. In addition to other restric- tions of this section and article III of chapter 10, the use, con- struction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the Planned Office District shall meet the following standards: a. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a com- bination of the following: 1. Face brick; 2. Natural stone; Relevant Codes per City of Edina Sec. 36-579 (cont.) 3. Specially designed precast concrete units, if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; 4. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials are any of those noted in subsections (3)a.1 through 3 of this section; or 5. Glass or pre finished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron). b. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general ap- pearance. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 7 Site Analysis- Land Use Single-Family Duplex Multi-Family Mixed-Use Retail Office Senior Living Key - Usage Land Use N France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles. Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facili- tating movement of people within and to the district. Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without “leftover” spaces on sites. Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and antici- pated problems. Promote well-balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Give-to-Get; Plan & Process Edina Cultural Preferences; Identity District Function Comprehensive Connections; Movement Site Design; Transitions Health Innovation Land Use; Live-able Precincts Economic Vitality France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 8 Bike Paths The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail meanders past its namesake Creek, and through the wetlands and woodlands of the Edina area including the newly master planned Fred Richards Park. When complete, the trail will travel from Hopkins through Edina and Richfield, connecting to the Nokomis-Minnesota River Regional Trail in Richfield and the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail in Hopkins. The Trail will extend 15.3 miles when complete. The sizes occupy a key crossroads for this regional infrastructure and provide an opportunity to create a signature landmark for the Edina com- munity. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail F R A N C E A V E N U E S O U T H WEST 76TH S T R E E T PARKLAW N A V E N U E Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail in Southdale Area DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 9 Nine-Mile Creek Regional Trail Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Bike Route Bus Line Bus Station Key Trail at intersection of France and Gallagher Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, Edina East Sec. - Three Rivers Park District Current Investment - Bridge spanning Hwy. 100 north of Interstate 494 (finished) N France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 10 Sketch Vision Sketch Vision from Southdale Study (2016) *from dated March 18th, 2016 Proposed Site Edina Southdale Re-visioning Plan: • Build upon existing assets • Improve access • Walkable • Human-scaled • Architecturally varied • Mixed-use • Family friendly • Green • Summer city • Winter city • Connected • A destination DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 11 Southdale Height Study >200 ft 100-200 ft <100 ft Key N Southdale Height Study Site 1. The Edina Towers:154 ft.2. Point of France: 130 ft 4. The Westin Edina Galleria: 215 ft3. One Southdale Place: 115 ft 5. The Durham: 118 ft 7. Brookdale Edina: 190 ft 8. Yorktown Continental: 105 ft6. Minnesota Center: 207 ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 12 SITE 1 2 1 2 Gallagher Dr France Ave SW 72nd St Panorama- 7200&7250 France Ave 1. West View from France Ave 2. East View from France Ave Across From Project Site Project Site N Key Plan DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 13 Panorama- 7200&7250 France Ave 3. North View from Gallagher Dr 4. South View from Gallagher Dr Project Site Across From Project Site Key Plan SITE 1 2 1 2 Gallagher Dr France Ave SW 72nd St N France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 14 Topography 7200 & 7250 France Avenue S The site is located to the west of South France Ave and in between the West 72nd St and the Gallagher Dr. There is a 24-foot elevation difference from the high point of the site to the low point of the site which provides suitable conditions for underground parking. Topography @ 2’ contours from Hennepin County GIS Existing Topography N High Point +860.00 ft Low Point +836.00 ft DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 15 Size Comparison 7200/7250 France Avenue Total Area: 225,831 sf/ 5.18 ac One Southdale Place Total Area: 222,919 sf/ 5.12 ac N N SITE One Southdale France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 16 Survey - 7200 France Avenue South Survey-2008 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 17 Survey - 7250 France Avenue South 4 Story Glass and Concrete Building 7250 France Ave S, Edina, MN 55435 Concrete Foundation Area: 13,947 Sq. Ft. N89°51'35"W 300.00 S00°11'54"E 268.99N75°01'42 " E 5 6 . 4 1 121.79 Δ=14°46'24" R=472.36 N89°48'06"E 125.00 N00°11'54"W 237.2293.15 148.095.75 1.6686.94 150.67Gallagher Drive France Ave(A Public R/W)(A Public R/W)2 Story Parking Ramp Below Access to 2 Story Parking Ramp BelowDESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Parcel 1: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Parcel 2: Together with the benefit of Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 12, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as Document No. 1022380. Parcel 3: Together with the benefit of Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 10, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as Document No. 1022381. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Notes (numbered per Table A) 1.Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. 2.Site Address: 7250 France Ave S, Edina, MN 55435. 3.This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27059C0452F, effective date of 11-04-16. 4.The Gross land area is 73,298+/- square feet or 1.683 +/- acres. 5.Elevations are based on the top nut of the hydrant located at the southwest corner of the property, as shown hereon, having an elevation of 862.76 feet (NGVD 1929). 6.The current Zoning for the subject property was not provided by the insurer. Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 11.We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. SURVEY REPORT 1.This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Loan Policy for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, File No. 552885, dated June 1, 2017. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referenced Title Commitment: a. Item no.'s 1-3 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: 3.Drainage and utility easements(s) as shown on the recorded Plat of Oscar Roberts First Addition. As shown hereon. 4.The following appears as a Memorial on the Certificate of Title: Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 12, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as Document No. 1022380. This easement is located over the northerly adjoining property as shown hereon. 5.The following appears as a Memorial on the Certificate of Title: Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 10, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as Document No. 1022381. This Easement is located over the northeast portion of the westerly adjoining property as shown hereon. 6.Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated January 28, 1972, filed February 8, 1972, as Document No. 1022382. This easement is located over the north 5 feet of the subject property as shown hereon. 7.Easement for public road purposes, in favor of the Village of Edina dated May 20, 1972, filed May 31, 1972, as Document No. 1032483. This easement is located in the southeast corner of the subject property, as shown hereon. 8.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524065. This easement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 9.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524066. This easement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 10.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524067.This easement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 11.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524068. This easement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 2.Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes: a.There is a sidewalk that located partially on the subject property in the southwest corner of the site as shown hereon. b.there is a driveway that encroached the northeasterly portion of the site, as shown hereon. c.There is a bituminous driveway that is accessing the northerly and adjoining property without an easement, as shown hereon. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: France Equities, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Commerce Bank, a Minnesota chartered bank, its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear; and Old Republic National Title Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 11 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on February 9th, 2018. Dated this 14th day of February, 2018. ________________________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com OVERHEAD UTILITIES FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER TELEPHONE LINE CABLE LINE WATERMAIN ELECTRIC LINE GASMAIN CHAINLINK FENCELINE GUARDRAIL SIGN SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METERWOODEN FENCELINE WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE BARBED WIRE FENCE AIR CONDITIONER BOLLARD SOIL BORING CLEAN OUT CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC BOX HANDHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS VALVE FLAG POLE HANDICAP SYMBOL FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT CAST IRON MONUMENT SET IRON MONUMENT FLARED END SECTION Linetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEBLOCK RET WALL UTILITY MANHOLE VICINITY MAP7250 France Ave7250 France Ave, Edina, MN 55435333 washington avenue north, suite 210 union plaza, minneapolis, mn 55401DJR Architecture, Inc.PROJECT4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com Matt Pavek Pat Sarver 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 PROJECT NO.: 18033 COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c 44565 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2-14-18 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION V1.0 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 3-19-18 ADDED TREES .. .. .. .. .. 40102001040 SCALE IN FEET N N Survey-2007 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 18 Existing Conditions - 7200 France Avenue The western property line on the proposed site is bordered by an existing tree grove on the 7200 parcel and a retaining wall and existing parking structure on the 7250 parcel. West Property Line DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 19 Existing Conditions - 7250 France Avenue The western property line on the proposed site is bordered by an existing tree grove on the 7200 parcel and a retaining wall and existing parking structure on the 7250 parcel. West Property Line France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 20 Existing Conditions - The Cedars West Property Line The western property line on the proposed site is bordered by a n apartment complex known as The Cedars of Edina . DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 21 The Proposed Project 7200 & 7250 France Avenue S 07.30.2018 290-310 Apartments+ 20 Town-Homes + 30,000 sf Commercial France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 22 Overall Perspective 1 Rendering viewing West across France Avenue DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 23 Overall Perspective 2 Rendering viewing the West promenade France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 24 Overall Masterplan Overall Masterplan N France Avenue Mixed-Use The concept of Mixed-Use Living is to place increased density at appropriate locations within the Southdale Area and provide the vital links between the neighborhoods that allow the density to fit within the urban fabric correctly. Incorporating the Woonerfs concept to the West Promenade al- lows a perfect hybrid of live, work and relaxed in a well-balanced neighborhood. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 25 Stacking Diagram 86' - 6"RESIDENT IAL RETAIL 76' - 6"RESIDENTIALRETAILRESIDENTIALRETAIL88' - 6"20' - 0"Overall Summary Stacking Diagram Retail Residential Key Proposed (GSF)Floors Residential 323,690 6 Retail 29,300 1 Parking 132,842 2 Total 485,832 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 26 Summary - Site Data PID: 3102824140001 Address: 7200 France Avenue S. Area: 152,751 SF (3.51 acres) Zoning: POD-1 FAR: 0.5 Height Overlay: HOD-4, 4 stories or 48’, whichever is less. Legal Designation: The N 325 Ft Of The E 520 Ft Of Se 1/4 Of Ne 1/4 Ex Road Proposed: Area/FAR: 224,519 SF (1.46 FAR) Height: 74’-0” to top of deck Density: 121-164 units (34-46 units per acre) PID: 3102824140015 Address: 7250 France Avenue S. Area: 73,080 SF (1.68 acres) Zoning: POD-1 FAR: 0.5 Height Overlay: HOD-4, 4 stories or 48’, whichever is less. Legal Designation: Oscar Roberts First Addition Lot 004 Block 001 EX Street Proposed: Area/FAR: 154,541 SF (2.11 FAR) Height: 159’-4” to top of deck Density: 145-170 units (86-101 units per acre) Site A Data Site B Data Street View from France Ave Overall Proposed: Area/FAR: 379,060 SF (1.67 FAR) Height: 159’-4” to top of deck Density: 266-334 units (51-64 units per acre) Site A Area Table (7200 France) Site A Parking Table Site B Area Table (7250 France) Site Parking Table For Sale Town-Homes table (7200 France) 7250 Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces 7200 Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces L1 38,000 L1 47,000 Parking (TH) 15,900 18 Parking (TH) 23,000 22 Townhomes 5,800 8 Townhomes 11,000 14 Retail A 4,900 Retail C 6,000 Retail B 11,400 Retail D 7,000 L2 Apartments 31,100 31 L2 Apartments 35,820 35 L3 Apartments 29,220 30 L3 Apartments 31,060 31 L4 Apartments 29,220 30 L4 Apartments 31,060 31 L5 Apartments 27,430 28 L5 Apartments 31,060 31 L6 Apartments 19,160 20 L6 Apartments 23,580 21 L7 Apartments 3,000 L7 Apartments 5,450 TOTAL 177,130 139 8 TOTAL 205,030 149 14 PARK Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces T.H.Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces P2 Parking 132,850 368 4 Sale L1 Townhomes 12,500 10 10 P1 Parking 132,850 368 L2 Townhomes 12,500 TOTAL 265,700 736 TOTAL 25,000 10 T.H.Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces 4 Sale L1 Townhomes 12,500 10 10 L2 Townhomes 12,500 TOTAL 25,000 10 PARK Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces P2 Parking 132,850 368 P1 Parking 132,850 368 TOTAL 265,700 736 7250 Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces 7200 Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces L1 38,000 L1 47,000 Parking (TH) 15,900 18 Parking (TH) 23,000 22 Townhomes 5,800 8 Townhomes 11,000 14 Retail A 4,900 Retail C 6,000 Retail B 11,400 Retail D 7,000 L2 Apartments 31,100 31 L2 Apartments 35,820 35 L3 Apartments 29,220 30 L3 Apartments 31,060 31 L4 Apartments 29,220 30 L4 Apartments 31,060 31 L5 Apartments 27,430 28 L5 Apartments 31,060 31 L6 Apartments 19,160 20 L6 Apartments 23,580 21 L7 Apartments 3,000 L7 Apartments 5,450 TOTAL 177,130 139 8 TOTAL 205,030 149 14 PARK Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces T.H.Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces P2 Parking 132,850 368 4 Sale L1 Townhomes 12,500 10 10 P1 Parking 132,850 368 L2 Townhomes 12,500 TOTAL 265,700 736 TOTAL 25,000 10 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 27 Masterplan Site Description Masterplan N 95’ 40’ 48’ 55’ 25’ N The site is composed of two parcels, 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. The 7200 parcel (Site A) is proposed to be a 6 floor mixed-use building that steps down to a 2 story town-homes to the West. The building will house 149 units, 14 town home units, 10 for sale Town-houses and 13,000 SF of Retail along France Avenue. The 7250 parcel (Site B) is proposed to be a 6 story mixed-use building which will house 139 residential units, 8 town-home units approximately 16,000 SF of retail along France Avenue Both buildings will also have 2 levels of underground parking which will be accessible from either the road connecting from France Avenue to the West Promenade and the from the West Promenade. The two building will also have access to on grade parking for the town home units. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 28 Vehicular Circulation Diagram Site - Vehicular Circulation Vehicular Circulation Transit Stops Roundabout/ Fountain Controlled Intersections Vehicular Circulation N The concept of the vehicular circulation was to provide very ac- cessible internal circulation off of France Avenue and Gallagher Drive which can be easily managed with the phasing of the proj- ect. There are drop-off locations on the West Promenade and the street connecting from France Ave to the West Promenade (retail/residential). There are multiple transit stops adjacent to the project which are located at the intersection of France and Gallagher and the intersection of France and 72nd. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 29 Pedestrian/Bike Circulation Diagram Site - Pedestrian & Bike Circulation Bike Circulation Pedestrian Circulation Anticipated Nodes Linear Node Pedestrian/Bike Circulation N The concept of the pedestrian and bike circulation on site was based on the Woonerf concept. Pedestrian circulation starts on France Avenue and spills onto the parallel Woonerf (the West Promenade) through 72nd, Gallagher and a mid-block connect- ing France Avenue to the West Promenade. The Woonerf is a pedestrian oriented street with plenty of social activities and places for rest and socializing. The Townhomes on the East and for sale Town-Houses on the west of the Woonerf are both fac- ing the pedestrian oriented street and a vehicular street allows access from the south of the two sites on Gallagher to 72nd on the north. This access holds one of the two underground parking accesspoints. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 30 Floor Plans - Level P1-P2 N Scale: NTS PARK Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces P2 Parking 132,850 368 P1 Parking 132,850 368 TOTAL 265,700 736 Retail Residential Lobby MEP & Service Core Parking Key BIKE STORAGE BIKE STORAGE BIKE STORAGE GEN. ELEC. ADA SPEED RAMP TO P1 SPEED RAMP TO P1 LEVEL P2 PARKING 368 STALLSSITE PROPERTY LINESITE 1B DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 31 Floor Plans - Level 1 N Scale: NTS Retail Residential Lobby MEP & Service Core Parking Key RETAIL RETAIL FOR SALE TOWN HOMES RETAIL RETAIL PARKING AMENITIES RENTABLE TOWN HOMES RENTABLE TOWN HOMES RENTABLE TOWN HOMES 72nd St. W France Ave. Gallagher Dr. 7200 Level 1 Units Residential 47,000 Rental Town-homes 11,000 14 For Sale Town-homes 25,000 10 Retail 13,000 Total 96,000 7250 Level 1 Units Residential 38,000 Rental Town-homes 5,800 8 For Sale Town-homes Retail 16,300 Total 60,100 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 32 7200 Level 2 Units Residential 31,791 core 4,029 Total 35,820 31 7250 Level 2 Units Residential 27,580 core 3,520 Total 31,100 31 Floor Plans - Level 2 N Scale: NTS Retail Residential Lobby Courtyard / Plaza Core Parking Key FFE XXX.00’ OUTDOOR COURTYARD OUTDOOR COURTYARD APARTMENTS APARTMENTS FOR SALE TOWN HOMES DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 33 Floor Plans - Level 3 - 4 N Scale: NTS Retail Residential Lobby MEP & Service Core Parking Key APARTMENTS 7200 Level 3 Units Residential 27,330 core 3,730 Total 31,060 31 7250 Level 3 Units Residential 25,810 core 3,410 Total 29,220 30 APARTMENTS PATIOPATIOPATIO France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 34 Floor Plans - Level 5 N Scale: NTS Retail Residential Lobby MEP & Service Core Parking Key 7200 Level 5 Units Residential 27,330 core 3,730 Total 31,060 31 7250 Level 5 Units Residential 24,020 core 3,410 Total 27,430 28 APARTMENTS APARTMENTS PATIO DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 35 Floor Plans - Level 6 N Scale: NTS Retail Residential Lobby MEP & Service Core Parking Key APARTMENTS APARTMENTS 7200 Level 6 Units Residential 20,700 core 2,880 Total 23,580 31 7250 Level 6 Units Residential 17,390 core 1,770 Total 19,160 20 PATIO France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 36 Floor Plans - Level 7 N Scale: NTS Retail Residential Lobby MEP & Service Core Parking Key 7200 Mezzanine Units Residential 5,450 core Total 5,450 31 7250 Mezzanine Units Residential 3,000 core Total 3,000 APARTMENTS DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 37 Massing Views West Elevation View France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 38 Massing Views Aerial View from France Ave DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 39 Massing Views Aerial View from W 72 ST. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 40 Massing Views Aerial View from Gallagher DR. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 41 Massing Views West Elevation View France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 42 Massing Views View from North-East corner DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 43 Massing Views South Elevation View France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 44 Massing Views Aerial View from France Ave DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 45 Massing Views Aerial View from the West Promenade France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 46 Neighborhood Sight Lines Street View from 72nd Ave. DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 47 Neighborhood Sight Lines Street View from 72nd Ave. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 48 Shadow Studies 9 am 12 pm 3 pm Spring Equinox March 20 Summer Solstice June 21 Winter Solstice December 22 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use 49 Street Perspective Thank you To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date August 9,2018 Cary: At your request, we reviewed the most recent Sketch Plan submission for the 7200-7250 France Avenue parcels based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for how their guiding principles may translate to the built environment. We believe many aspects of this plan align with the planning and design ideas set forth in the Greater Southdale District Planning Framework. However we have a few comments related to the details set forth in the plan as they relate to the overall Framework and our continued discussions with the Work Group. These comments are based on the visual information provided to the City by DJR Architects, with a corresponding diagram on the page 3 of this memo to help illustrate points. Comments: 1.West 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive:Within the framework plan and our continued work on the Southdale district, West 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive are designated as a primary east/west connection to and from the residential neighborhood to the west, and any adjacent development should be structured with a 30 foot landscape setback along both sides of the street with buildings at 4 stories maximum height, and an additional building setback of 30 feet for buildings above 4 stories –not to exceed 6 stories maximum. The intent is to create a pattern of trees, landscaping and sidewalks that harmonize with the existing character and experience of the 1-2 story single family residential buildings beyond. It is important to note that this scale of building and landscape on these primary east-west corridors is intended to extend throughout the Southdale district to enhance the traditional Edina neighborhood and translate it into an experience that conveys the essence of “Edina” in this evolving district. To that end, we recommend that the building heights along Gallagher Drive and West 72nd Street –extending to and including the corner at France –be reduced from 6 stories to 4 stories. 2.The West Promenade: As an essential pedestrian, bike, and vehicle street that accommodates service access as well, the West Promenade is intended to serve as a transition from 2-3 story townhouses and apartment buildings on the west side, to 4 story buildings on the east side of the Promenade, transitioning to the development of 6 stories along France Avenue. The proposal demonstrates how this can be accomplished with 2 story townhouses facing the Promenade at grade on each side of the street, with a setback and 2 additional stories above on the east side. However, any height above 4 stories on the east side needs to be set back a minimum of 30 feet from the face of the building to transition to the 6 story experience along France. 3.The 95’ wide West Promenade is not well defined. In our planning efforts, the intent is that the Promenade become an intimate neighborhood street used as a north-south passage extending through the district. On this proposal, paving appears to be about 70% of the surface and landscaping is not defined to how it supports the character of the townhouses. Comments (cont.) 4.Townhouses on the west side of the West Promenade could turn the corner on 72nd to balance the transition from the residential neighborhood east to the corner of 72nd and France. In addition, having some retail on the Promenade could enliven the experience, particularly at the corner of Gallagher and the Promenade. 5.Where do residents park in the owner-occupied townhouse units? Is there separate below- grade parking, will they park across the street, or are you envisioning garages facing the Promenade? 6.Why is there a parking entrance off the Promenade on the 7200 building? It appears the access to parking could be from the roadway between 7200 and 7250. Amenities could then move to the corner of the Promenade to enliven the Promenade neighborhood experience. 7.Level 5 units facing the Promenade and the neighborhood should setback a minimum of 40’ to assure the 4 story (maximum) along the Promenade is visually maintained, and is buffered by a landscaped terrace on the 4th floor roof. 8.Set back the 6 story building a minimum of 30 feet from the 4 story cornice along W 72nd and Gallagher. 9.7th floor units should be set back from the corner of Gallagher and 72nd and France. 10.Generally, the buildings are meeting the intent to shape the experience from a pedestrian point of view but the setbacks are not deep enough to keep the architecture from dominating the neighborhood experience at the street level. Corners do not need to be the highest point of the project along 72nd and Gallagher. The intent is to let buildings in this important transition zone respect the historical context of lower scale from townhouses extending to the retail corner. Keeping the cornice line lower and letting trees and landscape dominate will create a more seamless transition in the day-to-day experience of residents. Please refer to the diagram on the following page for further illustration of the above points. Thank you for the opportunity to review. As always, let me know if you have any questions. Mic Comments (cont.) Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic 60 foot wide street typology 60 to 80 foot wide woonerftypology30 foot landscaping setback 30 foot landscaping setback 30 foot setback above the 4th floor 30 foot setback above the 4th floor40 foot setback above the 4th floor6 story maximum building height. 7th floor popups need to be setback from the main facade 6 story maximum building height. 7th floor popups need to be setback from the main facade 2 to 3 story maximum building height.