Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-09-12 Planning Commission PacketAgenda Plan n ing Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers Wednesday, September 12, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes V.Public Hearings A.Variance request B-18-24 at 5119 Wooddale Glen VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.2019 Planning Commission Work Plan VIII.Correspondence And Petitions IX.Chair And Member Comments X.Sta1 Comments XI.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampli5c ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: S eptember 12, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:Varianc e reques t B-18-24 at 5119 Wooddale G len Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Deny the 14-foot setback variance to the required 50 foot setback from M innehaha C reek at 5119 Wooddale Glen. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he subject property, 5119 Wooddale Glen, is approximately 27,237 square feet in area and located on the north side of Wooddale Glen, and south of M innehaha C reek. T he existing home on the lot is a newly constructed, two story home. T he initial survey that was submitted with the building permit for the home did not include a patio or fireplace in the rear yard. I t was found, with the submittal of an as-built survey, that the patio and fireplace that were added do not meet the 50 foot setback requirement from the creek. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Aerial Map Engineering Memo Applicant Submittal September 12, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, AICP, Assistant City Planner A 14-foot setback variance from the 50 foot setback requirement from a pond for an existing patio and fireplace at 5119 Wooddale Glen Information / Background: The subject property, 5119 Wooddale Glen, is approximately 27,237 square feet in area and located on the north side of Wooddale Glen, and south of Minnehaha Creek. The existing home on the lot is a newly constructed, two-story home. The initial survey that was submitted with the building permit for the home did not include a patio or fireplace in the rear yard. It was found, with the submittal of an as-built survey, that the patio and fireplace that were added do not meet the 50-foot setback requirement from the creek. The patio and fireplace requiring the variance do not meet the required 50 foot setback from Minnehaha Creek. The patio and fireplace are currently setback 36 feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features 5119 Wooddale Glen is a newly constructed two-story home. The building permit for the home was approved April, 2017. These structures do not meet the required 50 foot setback from Minnehaha Creek. The patio and fireplace are currently setback 36 feet. Staff has not received any complaints in regard to the location of the fireplace. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in the memorandum dated September 6, 2018. The drainage closely matches the approved stormwater plan. The applicant will need to work with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to obtain any required permits. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – East Side - South– West Side – 10 feet 50 feet (from creek) 10 feet 45.3 feet 42.2 feet 36 feet* 15.3 feet 45.3 feet *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed variance justified? No. Staff does not believe the variance is justified. Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff does not believe there is a practical difficulty that prevents reasonable use. The fireplace and patio could have been constructed to meet the required setback. There is adequate area on the flat portion of the lot in front of the home outside of the 50-foot setback requirement. (See attached.) STAFF REPORT Page 3 The applicant built the patio and fireplace without city approval. If the variance were denied reasonable use of the property would not be denied, as the patio and fireplace could be relocated on the site. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances were created by the applicant by locating the patio and fireplace within the required setback. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. This area is heavily wooded and the proposed fireplace and patio would not be very visible from surrounding properties. Recommended Action: Deny the 14-foot setback variance to the required 50 foot setback from Minnehaha Creek at 5119 Wooddale Glen. Denial is based on the following finding: 1. A building permit for this home was approved in April of 2017. The initial survey that was submitted with the building permit for the home did not include a patio or fireplace in the rear yard. 2. There is not a practical difficulty that would prevent reasonable use of the property. The fireplace and patio could be relocated/reconstructed on the site meet the required setback. There is adequate area on the flat portion of the lot in front of the home outside of the 50-foot setback requirement. 3. If the variance were denied reasonable use of the property would not be denied, as the patio and fireplace could be relocated on the site. If the Planning Commission believes the request is reasonable, the following findings could be made: 1. The practical difficulty is the location of the home and the existing slope toward the creek. The fireplace could be relocated to meet the required setback to the creek, however the site would have to be regraded, and the fireplace would be located just 10-15 feet from the home and would be in front of the basement windows 2. There is roughly 10 feet of elevation change from the end of the patio/fireplace to the lot line. 3. The patio and fireplace are well screened by existing vegetation and would not have a visual impact in the area. Approval would be subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey dated August 10, 2018 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. STAFF REPORT Page 4 3. The patio may not be expanded. 4. Approval of a Wetland Protection Permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Deadline for a city decision: October 9, 2018. Edina, H ennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates 2013, HN Aerial 2015, ©WSB & Associates 2013 5119 Wooddale Glen Septe mber 6, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 100 ft / DATE: September 6, 2018 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Charles Gerk, P.E. – Graduate Engineer RE: 5119 Wooddale Glen - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department. Since the work is already complete, and this is a retroactive review, documents reviewed include the as-built survey dated 7/16/2018 and the approved stormwater management plan dated 3/1/2017. Grading and Drainage The final grading for this site closely matches the approved stormwater plan. The run-off from the patio drains directly to Minnehaha Creek. The encroaching portion of the patio is approximately 200 SF. Current and previous Engineering Policies would not require stormwater mitigation for the new impervious cover as it does not drain to a neighboring private property or to a public storm sewer that is over capacity. Erosion and Sediment Control No Comments Floodplain The lot is adjacent to Minnehaha Creek and is encroached by the 1% annual chance flood, which is modeled at 867.5’. There is no encroachment into the floodplain by this or any other work completed on the site. Street and Curb Cut No Comments Public Utilities O ther Items As a condition of this variance the applicant will be required to obtain a Wetland Protection Permit from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. EXISTING HOUSEENCLOSEDPORCHENCLOSEDPORCHFINAL DRIVEWAY EDGE OF DISTURBANCEFOOTPRINT NO NET INCREASE OVER EXISTINGPROTECT EX. TREE2' RADIUS MIN CLEAR AREAPROTECT EX. TREE AT DRIPLINE -APPROVED BY EDINA FORESTERPROTECT EX. TREE AT DRIPLINEACF EROSIONEEL® (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTENDED ACROSSEX.DRIVEWAY. COVER EROSIONEEL WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.SECURE VIA STAKES IN GREEN AREAS. SECURE GEOTEXTILE ANDEROSIONEEL WITH CINDER BLOCK SPACED 10' MIN O.C. OR ASNEEDED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT FROM VEHICLETRAFFIC.INSPECT AND SWEEP DAILY.APPROX CONST. LIMIT APP R O X C O N S T . L I M I T879880876.7885.0886.9883.2883.2EXISTING ENTRANCE AND WALKRESTORED AND VEGETATEDPORCHFINAL DRIVEWAY EDGE OF DISTURBANCEFOOTPRINT NO NET INCREASE OVER EXISTINGPROPOSED HOUSEPROTECT EX. TREE2' RADIUS MIN CLEAR AREAPROTECT EX. TREE AT DRIPLINE -APPROVED BY EDINA FORESTERPROTECT EX. TREE AT DRIPLINE882878880.5EX876884 2' RETAINING WALL -REQUIRED TO PRESERVETREE880ACF EROSIONEEL® (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EXTENDED ACROSSEX.DRIVEWAY. COVER EROSIONEEL WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC.SECURE VIA STAKES IN GREEN AREAS. SECURE GEOTEXTILE ANDEROSIONEEL WITH CINDER BLOCK SPACED 10' MIN O.C. OR ASNEEDED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT FROM VEHICLETRAFFIC.INSPECT AND SWEEP DAILY.886.0CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE DITCHCENTEROF DITCH TO PROVIDE 1' MIN DEPTHPERPENDICULAR FROM BUILDINGOPENING @ MIN 5FT OFFSETAPPROX CONST. LIMIT APP R O X C O N S T . L I M I T 882.05% MIN 5% M IN EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF OLDBUILDING (FOR REFERENCE)LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED1. DIG A 6"X6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED FENCE LINE.2. DRIVE ALL POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH.3. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ON THE UPHILL SIDE ALONG THE FENCE LINE, AND BACK FILL.4. WOOD POSTS MAY BE SPACED UP TO 4 FEET APART TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC.5. REMOVE SILT FENCE AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS REACHED.NOTES:POST (METAL OR WOOD 2"X2")BACK FILL 6"X6" TRENCH12" MIN.DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOWUNDISTURBED SOILEROSION CONTROL FENCE DETAIL964MUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OFEXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER ANDALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THETO THE CONSULTANT BEFORE PROCEEDING.ON THE WORK AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCYCONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS THE WORK.PROJECT NO.PROJECT:No.DRAWING TITLEREVISIONS-DRAWING ISSUEDescriptionDateDRAWING NO.5119 Woodale GlenEdina, MN 17-LOCA-01 F 651.216.7275P 612.216.2573 Roseville, MN 551132355 Fairview Avenue S info@mariner-ps.comEngineering Planning and Design Land and Environment Mariner Professional ServicesC 2013 Mariner Professional Services - All Rights ReservedMPSMPSI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.SIGNATURE:TYPED OR PRINTED NAME:ADAM T. PARKERDATE 3/1/17REG. NO. 42733CLIENT:DRAWNWORK VERIFIEDINITIAL PLAN DATECAD FILEPLAN APPROVEDNOTE REGARDING USE OF THIS DOCUMENT: Unless MPS has asigned agreement to provide Construction Management Serviceswhich include directive Inspection and Verification services relatedto this document, and initialed "Work Inspected" and "WorkVerified" information appears in document title block, the ProjectOwner, Construction Contractors and Installers agrees toindemnify, defend, and hold harmless MPS and its officers, agents,and employees including other design professionals responsible forpreparation of this document against any and all claims, suits,losses, damages, or costs, including reasonable attorney's fees,arising from the use of design or construction documents, signedor unsigned, in electronic or paper form.CHECKEDWORK INSPECTEDIF BAR < 1 INCH PLAN ISREDUCED SCALECHECK REVISION FOR UPDATELocale Design Build313 W. 46th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55419952-220-45431/1 GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER PLAN40200SCALE IN FEETGENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES:IMPORTANT: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THESE NOTES PRIOR TO WORK COMMENCING. IN ADDITION TO THE NOTES SHOWN ON THECURRENT PLAN, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL APPLICABLEITEMS AND ADDRESS CONFLICTS OR ISSUES WITH THE PROJECT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. TYPICAL ADDITIONALAPPLICABLE DOCUMENTS MAY INCLUDE (NOT EXHAUSTIVE AND SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY):·NPDES PERMITS·GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN, LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN, PLANTING PLAN, DETAIL SHEETS ETC.·GEOTECHNICAL SOIL EVALUATION·GRADING, UTILITY, AND PAVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS·MUNICIPAL, WATER DISTRICT, STATE, FEDERAL AND REGULATORY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, STATUTES, RULES AND ORDINANCES.IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY REGARDING CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN MULTIPLE AGENCIES, THE MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTSSHOULD BE FOLLOWED.1.THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT "THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVELWAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02 TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTINGSUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA". CLASS LEVEL D INDICATES THE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINETHE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FORMINNESOTA AT 1-800-252-1166). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BEOCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).2.THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN REPRESENTS MINIMUM SUGGESTED SITE CONTROLS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTORSHOULD USE THIS PLAN AND OTHER PLANS FOR REFERENCE AS TO ADD OR REPLACE ADDITIONAL SITE CONTROLS AS REQUIRED TO CONTROLCONSTRUCTION RUNOFF. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENTPROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGESOCCURRING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.3.THE CONTRACTOR IS RECOMMENDED TO TRACK ALL REVISIONS AND CHANGES TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND PLACE THIS PLAN AND THESWPPP (IF PREPARED) IN PLAIN SIGHT AT ALL TIMES.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD PROVIDE A STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE: THIS DRAWING (EROSION & CONTROL PLAN), THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE SITE AND GRADING PLANS, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS, PLUS ANDY CONSTRUCTION RELATED PERMITS (e.g. NPDES PERMIT, MUNICIPAL EROSION CONTROL PERMIT, WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT, INCLUDING ALL RULES, REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS) AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. ADDITONAL DOCUMENTS e.g. INSPECTION LOGS, WORK SCHEDULES RELATED TO SITEWORK AND EROSION CONTROL SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE SWPPP AND INCLUDED AS PART OF SWPPP DOCUMENTS.5.THE SWPPP AND ALL OTHER SITEWORK, EXCAVATING, GRADING OPERATIONS, ETC., RELATED DOCUMENTS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE IN PLAINVIEW DURING CONSTRUCTION.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERSEE THEINSPECTION & MAINTENANCE OF THE BMP'S AND EROSION PREVENTION FROM BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ISCOMPLETED, IS APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES, THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE EPA BY EITHER THE OWNER OROPERATOR AS APPROVED ON PERMIT. ADDITONAL BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION.7.BMP'S AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.8.REFER TO THE NPDES PERMIT AND MUNICIPALITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING HANDLING OF THE FOLLOWING:SOLID WASTE: e.g. COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT & CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION DEBRIS & OTHER WASTES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: e.g. OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT & ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (AS DEFINED BY THEMUNICIPALITY, EPA, OR OSHA) MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHERDISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS.9.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AND PRIORTO ANY SITEWORK. THIS INCLUDES ROCK ENTRANCES, CONCRETE WASHING FACILITIES, AND SERVICE AREAS.10.IF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS ARE REQUIRED OR PLANNED, THE CONTRACTOR IS RECOMMENDED TO CONSULT WITH THE ENGINEER TODISCUSS BASIN OPERATION AND FUNCTION. BASINS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONAL BEFORE SITEWORK COMMENCES.11.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED FOR A PERIOD OF SEVEN DAYS OR MORE, OR HAS POTENTIALTO MOBILIZE SEDIMENT TO DOWNSTREAM AREAS SHOULD BE COVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OR THEMUNICIPALITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION FOREXPOSED SOIL IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED.12.CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES & FROM TEMPORARYSEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. OPERATION OF SEDIMENT BASINS USEDFOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO MEET NPDES AND MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THEOWNER.13.ON-SITE & OFF-SITE SOIL STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROJECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGHIMPLEMENTATION OF BMP'S. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (AT A MINIMUM) INCLUDING OFF-SITE AREAS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.14.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES SHOULD HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS & SHOULD NOT BE PLACED IN AREAS THATCAN RUNOFF UNCONTROLLED TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB & GUTTER SYSTEMS OR CONDUITS& DITCHES.15.ADDITIONAL INLET PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE ON ALL INSTALLED INLETS UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS REACHED AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE PROPERLY SECURED AS TO PREVENT MOVEMENT BY SEDIMENT ORWATER. INLET PROTECTION WILL BE REQUIRED AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS WITHIN 200' OF THE PROJECT SITE. CONTACT THE CITY OFEDINA ON USE OF ALLOWABLE CB INLET PROTECTION DEVICES.16.RECOMMENDED MINIMUM SITE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTSALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHALL BEMAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL PERMIT CONDITIONS ARE SATISFIED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OFWORK OR FINAL STABILIZATIONOF THE SITE. THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ON THIS PLAN MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVENDAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. THE DESIGNATEDPERSON SHOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND SHOULD MEET THE "TRAINING"REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL APPLICABLE BMP'S ARE CONTAINED IN AN INSPECTION LOG FOR THEPROJECT. AT A MINIMUM, THE LOG SHOULD MONITOR THE FOLLOWING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES:ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS AND INLETS IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT LOCATION.·ALL SEEDED AREAS·SILT FENCES·VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE·THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREAS·OUTLET STRUCTURES IN THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS·POTENTIAL SOURCES OF MOBILIZED SOILS AND DUST·WASHING AND CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE SERVICE FACILITIESATP-3/1/17SHEET SET INDEX:1. GRADING ESC AND STORMWATER PLANEngineer Contact:Adam Parker adamp@marriner-ps.com 651.216.7275SUPPLEMENTAL GRADING AND STORMWATER NOTES:1.ELEVATION AND DATUM INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT LOCALE DESIGN BUILD..2.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ACCESS FOR ANY WORK EXTENDING BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY.3.IF RESTORATION INFORMATION NOT SPECIFIED BY OWNER, GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS USING MNDOT SEED MIX 250 OR COVEREDUSING WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR MULCH. RESTORATION WITHIN RAIN GARDEN AREAS SHALL BE NATIVE SEED SUBJECT TO FREQUENT INUNDATION. USE OFSTRAW IS NOT ALLOWED.4.ALL STOCKPILES INCLUDING DEMOLITION DEBRIS STOCKPILES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OUTSIDE ANY SILT FENCE LOCATION.5.CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL "FINAL STABILIZATION"6.PROPOSED CONTOUR GRADES BASED ON SUPPLIED BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS DETERMINED BY OTHERS.7.SILT FENCE PLACED ALONG PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO FENCES PROVIDE 0.5FT MIN SETBACK.8.WHEN VEHICLE ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED, ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHOULD BE PLACED OVER ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS.892.3APERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR ESC ACTIVITIESBRIAN WITTE, 952-220-4543ORANGE FILTERFABRIC (36" MAX.HT.) OPENING INFABRIC WEAVE <.212MM NO BLACKCOLORED FABRICALLOWED892.3SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STATEMENTSEXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 4400 SF, PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS=4390SFNO INCREASE OF RUNOFF TO WOODDALE GLENSTREET CB INLET PROTECTIONNOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALEYARD AREA CB INLET PROTECTIONNOT TO SCALEWOOD STAKEEROSIONEEL SEDIMENT LOGSOR APPROVED EQUALSTAKE TO BE PLACE ATTOE OF SLOPE, BOTH SIDESNOT TO SCALESTAKED BIOROLL D:\MPS\17-LOCA-01\DWG\1-5119-Wooddale-ESC-Storm.dwg, 3/9/2017 5:33:06 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 5119 Wooddale GlenEdina, MN 55424 Lowest adjacent grade = 875 ft (NGVD29)FEMA Base Flood Elevation = 867.5 ft (NGVD29)Panel 27053C0362FZone AE Effective Date November 4, 2016Community number 2701602015 aerial photo Prepared by J. V. WilsonCity of EdinaAugust 26, 2016 WOODDALEGLN 5119 WOODDALE GLEN 5117 WOODDALE GLEN880878 868 876 8 7 4 872870 866864 882 884 886888890 8 8 6 880888 868 866 868886²0 30 60 9015Feet Legend Contours_2ft_NGVD29 Parcels Floodway, zone AE 1.0% annual chance (100 yr) flood, zone AE 0.2% annual chance (500 yr) flood I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 16th day of July, 2018 REHDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 • Survey for: LOCALE DESIGN BUILD at 5119 Wooddale Glen PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 8, COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT WOODDALE SECTION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. z 87, 74 870 11 868— 872 Gary C. Huber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 22036 N *****•... '"...„,',...„, s„ )27,u •..._. 'ZN-T--------_-.. .1/4% ---- --------",„,_,---,. :., , ..,..,..,.,. C ---. -,,,, ''•,,..,.. /(?) 2k*---1 '01-7/\--1- J.; \--145 ,:tt,68, '',, ';fr.•• 1.,...\,,C-7 7..Y_c7, I K .v .---A; _ N I Scale: 1 inch = 20 feet (:)inches H d. Pko die 04 44-G6t 1°03'46" R 4.24 Op 00, 4)- ti A=7 ."o °41‘ • CB Stone \ co wogs co \ )14"As co NJ 0 911 \ LEGEND Sq.* c pz Iron Monument Set • Iron Monument Found • ill L. PP •• -r- I L I I I .. 5.20 „ S8!2'I '12 ••• -S Concrete Surface Bituminous Surface Garage Floor Elevation = 883.54 Basement Elevation = 877.0 First Floor Elevation = 886.8 Building footprint = 2876 sq. ft. Total hardscape = 5209 sq. ft. Percent imprevious= 0.19% Lot Area = 27,000± square feet (0.62 acre) Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federal Drive • Suite 110 • Eagan, Minnesota • Phone (651) 452-5051 JOB: 164-2954.010 *NO yardscapes Variance Request 5119 Wooddale Glen 8-8-18 On behalf of the homeowners and Yardscapes inc. we are requesting a variance for a stone patio and stone fireplace that has been installed as part of the new home landscaping project into the 50' creek setback. A variance request would have been applied for prior to installation if there had been awareness of the 50' setback. The area into the setback measures 36' from the creek to the back of the fireplace on plan view. There is a 10' grade change from the creek which results in a 40' ground distance. The gradients at the patio location have not been altered from the previous conditions prior to the new home being constructed. The position of the fireplace is heavily screened with larger trees and shrubbery resulting in minimal to no visibility from neighboring properties. The location of the patio area coincides with the lower level walk out area. The location also happens to be the most level space at the back of the home. Any other areas inside the setback would have required significant grade changes and retaining walls. Other locations within the setback would have also been considerably more visible to surrounding properties. Please review accompanied photos of the space and surrounding views. Pi-ANN/NG DppARNENT AUG .1 0 2018 CITY OF EDEMA. 8609 Harriet Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55420 Phone: 952/887.2794 Fax: 952/887-2796 Web: yardscapesinc.com - t".• .1411e'. tya, 4.".• tt )4k ' --- - H. .1‘ , , - S hc'': • -1'%//,..f • V.-7-"`\ —;;.- -1' J', - h i iN,,, •, • . ,, ' i sR C tl . "I : , _ , , . ,„ ''. ' 'f—, i t• ; 1, 11/4, I ..1. ' ' - ' . '•'•o, • 1 , , ,,. •.... ve ., ,—.. ?",. I / : ) . , 1 .. , . ., -p X i .../i , f •• . , i 2 ; . , 0 , 57 .7 • . , ill:0.1f t; i,;,,,.-;:eff, zifs'oilygit, , 'lower AO VW,. liMMII.IMITY-011M111•11.111. I _ 1 Date: S eptember 12, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: O ther F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:2019 P lanning C ommis s ion Work P lan Ac tion, Dis cus s ion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R eview and consider the 2019 P lanning C ommission Work P lan. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description DRAFT-2019 Planning Commission Work Plan Board/Commission: Planning Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). ☒ Staff Liaison: ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs The Planning Commission is responsible to review all Land Use applications submitted to the City of Edina. Land Use applications include: Variances; Site Plan Review; Sketch Plan Review; Conditional Use Permits; Subdivision; Lot Line Adjustments; Rezoning; and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. To accomplish this responsibility the Planning Commission meets twice per month, on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month. The Planning Commission typically reviews 3-4 of the above requests each agenda. Liaison Comments: Planning Staff spends the majority (over 80%) of its time in support of land use applications brought before the planning commission and city council. This includes meeting with applicants, preparing staff reports, answering questions from the public, preparing for and attending meetings, and project follow up to ensure compliance. 2019 is expected to be another busy year with Land Use Applications. City Manager Comments: Progress Report: Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility Sent to Met Council ☒ Funds available Comprehensive Plan Update. Update required every 10 years by the Metropolitan Council. Follow up regarding questions/comments from adjacent cities. Submit to the Met Council for review and follow up required as necessary. by June 30, 2019 Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs Liaison Comments: Small Area Plans are anticipated to be finished in 2018. Public Hearings are anticipated on the whole plan early in 2019. There likely will be follow-up work required based on adjacent city review and Met Council Review. Staff coordinates with Boards and Commissions, adjacent cities, the City Council and the Met Council. City Manager Comments: Progress Report: Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility December 30, 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Zoning Ordinance Amendments.  Any recommendations that come out of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update.  Establishing an impervious surface regulation. (Grading & drainage)  Basement requirement for single family home. (Code currently requires a basement)  One-foot rule (Exception for lots that are required to raise their first floor elevation due to water table issues?)  Two car garage requirement (should we continue to require a 2-car garage?)  Consideration to allow single family homes in an R-2 District. Liaison Comments: The above provides a list of anticipated Ordinances to be considered. There will be more based on recommendations in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan. Staff provides background and drafts the amendments. City Manager Comments: Progress Report: Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) Target Completion Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Date (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Area Study for the Cahill Area Industrial Park. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Liaison Comments: This is a recommendation from the 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan. The boundaries of the study area would be expanded. City Manager Comments: Progress Report: Proposed Month for Joint Work Session (one time per year, up to 60 minutes): ☐ Mar ☐ April ☐ May ☐ June ☒ July ☐ Aug ☐ Sept ☐ Oct ☐ Nov