Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-10-17 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, October 17, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment Call 786-496-5601 Enter Conference 8419726# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak An operator will introduce you when it is your turn I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Oct. 3, 2023 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Request for Purchase: Council Chambers Cable Broadcast Audio Visual System D.Request for Purchase: City-Wide Solar Feasibility Study E.Approve Agreement with Southdale Center for Public Safety Services F.Request for Purchase: Braemar Field Emergency Repairs G.Request for Purchase: Mill Pond Harvester Access Ramp Replacement H.Request for Purchase: 2023 Kubota RTC-X1100 ATV I.Request for Purchase: Well Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 17 Rehabilitation VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: Extra Mile Day 2023 B.Proclamation: November 2023 as Lung Cancer Awareness Month in Edina C.2023 "Images of Edina" Presentation VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2023-77: Accepting Donations B.Resolution No. 2023-65: Conditional Use Permit, Puttshack Rooftop Dining, 10 Southdale Center C.Resolution No. 2023-66: Approving a Site Plan at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road for Minnesota Made Hockey D.Ordinance 2023-18: Amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction E.Sketch Plan Review for 4444 and 4200 W. 76th Street IX.Manager's Comments A.Prep Memo Oct. 17, 2023 X.Mayor And Council Comments XI.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliCcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous Council meeting. Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Oct. 3, 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft City Council Regular, Oct. 3, 2023 Minutes: Draft City Council Work Session, Oct. 3, 2023 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 3, 2023 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Emily Avilis, 4009 Grimes Avenue S., requested review of the roadway reconstruction assessments in Morningside C as they felt they were inequitable and unfair to the residents. She reviewed the petition that had over 100 signatures of the 115 homes in the neighborhood and asked the Council to consider their questions. Ed Mathie, 4011 Kipling, asked how the residents were protected from assessments being assessed inequitably. He shared data on the projected assessments that were 48% higher than Morningside D/E, then shared further that the split was based on what worked for the project from a construction standpoint and not an equity standpoint. Lisa Hollensteiner, 4066 Grimes Avenue S., asked if the City was allowed to assess residents more than the estimated property value added. She spoke about the value-added shortfall and how the benefit must be greater or equal to the assessment which had occurred in Morningside D/E but not in C. She asked which estimate should Morningside C residents be expecting, either the $13,800 assessment or the $10,800 assessment. She referred to policy that said homeowners would share in covering nonresidential lots but there was no policy on how street divisions were determined. She noted a dividing line was made at 42nd Street and because their neighborhood had all the nonresidential lots included the assessment, it was unfair. Meriwether Felt, 4116 Grimes Avenue S., spoke about the recent park reconstruction and brightness of the lighting at Avail Academy. She shared how they worked to have the lights be the same color, intensity, directed downward, and the benefit of lighting on Weber Park. She noted that Avail Academy did not want to honor the agreement and encouraged the City to contact them. Paul Thompson, 4244 Crocker, spoke about the large piles of soil left from the recent construction and asked for an update on the City’s goal to have them removed by end of October to allow for use of the skating rink. Gary Milacnik, 4020 Monterey Avenue, shared comments about how the roads in their neighborhood were never good because of the soils. He complimented City services received but noted as housing becomes more expensive, taxes become more expensive too with the increase in high-end housing. He commented Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 2 on how increased taxes drive out older residents which results in even more high-end housing. He encouraged the City to review why nonresident street reconstruction areas were charged as assessments as they should be charged to the City. He concluded that streets were more dangerous now and reconstruction resulted in more tree loss. Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, spoke about NOAH housing, how his family had been in the neighborhood since 1981, and addressing flooding since the beginning. He stressed the importance that Council and staff focus on zoning codes and enforce building codes. He commented on nearby homes where flooding concerns had increased since removal of retaining walls and said the City needs to focus more on the existing residents. David Frenkel, 4510 Lakeview Drive, encouraged enforcement of building codes. Bradley Benyas, 4200 Lynn Avenue, inquired about the phase out of special assessments and subsequent phase in of higher taxes. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal responded to Community Comments at the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Member Risser made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving the consent agenda as amended removing Item VI.O., Resolution No. 2023-76; Appointing Election Judges for the November 7, 2023 General Election, as follows: VI.A. Approve Minutes of the Worksession and Regular Meeting of September 19, 2023 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated September 15, 2023, totaling $1,434,697.38; Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated September 22, 2023 totaling $1,888,519.32 VI.C. Approve Public Utility Improvement Agreements VI.D. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-17; Amending Ordinance No. 2012-16 Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company VI.E. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-21; Amending Green to Go Packaging Enforcement VI.F. Request for Purchase; Change Order No. 1: Commissioning Services for Fire Station No. 2, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, HGA, $129,175 VI.G. Request for Purchase; Watermain Break Street Patching, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, McNamara Contracting, $111,206 VI.H. Request for Purchase; ENG23-12NB Heights Park Pedestrian Bridge Streambank Repair, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Pember Companies, $26,121 VI.I. Request for Purchase; Change Order No. 1 for ENG 23-1 NB Morningside C Roadway Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Groth Sewer & Water, $15,125 VI.J. Request for Purchase; Change Order No. 1 for ENG 22-4NB Nine Mile Creek Vegetation Management, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, to accept bid alternates and adjust project boundaries VI.K. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-75; Approving Cooperative Construction Agreement with Department of Transportation VI.L. Accept Traffic Safety Report of August 29, 2023 VI.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-67; Approving Hennepin Youth Sports Grant Application VI.N. Request for Purchase, Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Technology, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, EPA Audio Visual, $102,942 VI.O. Resolution No. 2023-76; Appointing Election Judges for the November 7, 2023 General Election Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 3 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA VI.O. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-76 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 7, 2023 GENERAL ELECTION – ADOPTED The Council thanked all who served as election judges and encouraged others to contact the City to serve in future elections. Clerk Allison said the City would be in need of more volunteers for the five elections in 2024 and encouraged residents to apply. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-76, appointing election judges for the November 7, 2023 general election. Seconded by Member Agnew. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. ENERGY EFFICIENCY DAY OCTOBER 4, 2023 – PROCLAIMED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to proclaim October 4, 2023, Energy Efficiency Day in Edina. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Sustainability Manager Hancock said this was the most important thing residents and businesses could do on their climate action journey and how this proclamation celebrated energy efficiency all month long then spoke about how even the small things helped by shutting off lights when leaving a room. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-69 WEED MOWING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. WD-23 – ADOPTED Assistant Director Parks and Natural Resources Director Swenson shared in the summer of 2023 the Parks & Recreation Maintenance Division cut weeds on four properties. The properties and cost associated with the use of equipment and staff time to cut the weeds was provided. Each cost should be assessed to the property owner for the payment to the City. He outlined work to contact the four property owners and the subsequent administrative fees then shared Edina City Code Chapter 30 Division 2 Maintenance Standards, Sub Section 30-119 Weeds which states that, "Except for the period from May 1 to June 15 each year for residential properties, weeds shall be regularly cut or controlled such that no individual plant shall exceed, at any time, twelve inches (12") in height or length, as measured from its base at the ground to the tip of each stalk, stem, blade or leaf." Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Pierce introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-69 levying special assessments for Improvement No. WD-23 weed mowing. Seconded by Member Jackson. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 4 VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-70 TREE REMOVAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-23 – ADOPTED Mr. Swenson shared the list of properties collectively had diseased trees that were removed in accordance with City Code Chapter 30, Article IV-Shade Tree Diseases. All property owners were first given an opportunity to remove the diseased trees within a one-month (31 days) period of time. If the trees were not removed within the period of time, the City contracted removal of the trees and assessed the property owner. The property owners at the addresses chose to have the City contract the removal of their trees in 2023 and have the cost of the removal or trimming assessed to their property. He noted this practice prevented the spread of tree diseases or was completed for safety. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. Public Testimony None. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Member Agnew introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-70 levying special assessments for Improvement No. TR-23 weed mowing. Seconded by Member Jackson. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-73 CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES, NO. DU-23 – ADOPTED Assistant Finance Director Thao shared that Resolution No. 2023-73 would certify delinquent utility accounts for collection with 2024 real estate taxes. She shared a list of accounts with delinquent utility charges with balances over $50 and delinquent 30 days or longer and said in 2023, 1,178 properties were sent notices. She shared customers were notified in writing and an administrative fee of $35 would be applied and that customers could pay their balances until November 20 otherwise the amounts would be certified to Hennepin County and applied with a 6.5% interest rate. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-73 certification of delinquent utilities, No. DU-23. Seconded by Member Pierce. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-58 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. M-23 – ADOPTED Facility Manager Otten shared the 2022 maintenance project and how the City provided trash and snow removal as well as general upkeep for the France Business District. He said the assessable costs were Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 5 $430,660.37 and resulted in a proposed assessment of $0.91/square foot, which was down from 2021 due to COVID cleaning costs and deferred planned maintenance costs. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. Public Testimony Paul Thompson, 4244 Crocker, addressed the Council. Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-58 levying special assessments for public improvements. Seconded by Member Pierce. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-68 AQUATIC VEGETATION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-23 – ADOPTED Water Resources Manager Wilson said the City managed contracts for aeration and aquatic vegetation management services in Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond as requested by groups eligible for the service according to section 3.4.2.4 Lake and Pond Management of the 2022 Water Resources Management Plan. These groups agreed to pay for the services by special assessment and the 2023 assessment period covered services from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022. She outlined the proposed Arrowhead Lake assessment for 36 properties at $292.64/unit, 33 units at Indianhead Lake at $449.06/unit, Lake Nancy for 20 units at $87.62/unit, and explained the Mill Pond tiered assessment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-68 levying special assessments for public improvements. Seconded by Member Pierce. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-71 TH-169 VALLEY VIEW TO APACHE NOISE WALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT; IMPROVEMENT NO. SA-21 – ADOPTED Director of Engineering Millner shared funding for the wall, per MnDOT’s Noise Wall Policy, was a cost share split with 90% paid by MnDOT and 10% to be paid locally. The 10% local cost was to assessed to the residents that received benefit from the noise wall. The City defined benefit as a 3.0 decibel noise reduction or greater which was a threshold the human ear could detect and that noise wall assessments were payable over 15 years. He said the noise model used to determine preliminary assessments was based on a Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 6 theoretical noise wall and had been updated with the actual wall design. The updated model showed a greater benefit to more properties than originally estimated and that 41 additional properties were included in this assessment that were not aware of a potential assessment related to the noise wall. He stated multiple project area maps were shared showing the changes of project limits and properties that benefitted from the noise wall construction and that two residents provided public input and four who commented on BetterTogetherEdina. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Natalie Reis, MnDOT Metro Noise and Air Quality Supervisor, responded to questions regarding noise level reductions based on the model use which was first done on preliminary design and then on 60% completion and included additional noise reductions and was not done based on noise monitoring. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:20 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-71 levying special assessment for public improvements. Seconded by Member Pierce. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.G. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-72 MORNINGSIDE D AND E NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-461 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 1, 2024 Mr. Millner shared the project area map and that all streets were reconstructed then clarified the Morningside C assessments would be done in October 2024. He spoke about the delayed sections due to utility work which was not typical but that the majority of the project was completed. He shared costs paid and the proposed assessable portion which only included street costs with the remaining costs covered by various funds of the City. He said the proposed $8,338.95 per REU was reduced from the estimated $9,400 per REU and said staff received comments on formal objections in writing based on turf restoration, contractor delays, and others. He shared the work of the Street Funding Task Force and how assessments were to slowly transition from 100% assessment to 0% over the next 16 years. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. Public Testimony Mindy Ahler, 4244 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council. Paul Thompson, 4244 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council. Bill Olexy, 4243 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council. Mr. Neal shared that due to contractor concerns and work not being completed, staff recommended this action be continued to October 1, 2024, for certification of assessments to allow time for the grass to grow and work to continue and address any possible systemic assessment equity issues. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 7 Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to continue the public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2023-72, levying special assessments for public improvements, to October 1, 2024. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.H. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-66 APPROVING A SITE PLAN AT 7250-7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD FOR MINNESOTA MADE HOCKEY – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 17, 2023 Community Development Coordinator Lewis shared Invicta Group, LLC (known as Minnesota Made Hockey), was proposing to construct a new 10,240 square foot training facility on the southern portion of the lot at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road. The parcel was 5.55 acres and currently had a 63,311 square foot structure containing two ice rinks and assorted support spaces that would remain. The proposed building was 64’ x 160’ and would include a turf area, weight training, and other hockey specific training space. Minnesota Made Hockey currently operated a training facility as a tenant in the building located at 7101 Amundson Avenue. The purpose of the new building was to move those operations to the new facility. The new structure would replace an outdoor ice rink that was added in 2013. The site was zoned Planned Industrial District, which allowed for athletic facilities as a permitted use and to accommodate the request, site plan approval was required. He spoke to the number of variances first required and the adjustments made to eliminate those variances and how now the request was just downsizing of the original project. Nick Sperides, Sperides Reiners Architects, thanked staff and Council on the behalf of the applicant and said they looked forward to their approval. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:19 p.m. Public Testimony Paul Thompson, 4244 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Teague clarified the necessary motion was to continue the public hearing and take action on October 17, 2023. Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to rescind the previous action closing the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing at noon on October 9, 2023, and continue action on Resolution No. 2023-66, approving a site plan at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road, to the October 17, 2023, Council meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.I. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-65 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PUTTSHACK ROOFTOP DINING, 10 SOUTHDALE CENTER – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 17, 2023 Assistant City Planner Bodeker shared Brendan Barker, on behalf of Puttshack, was proposing rooftop dining at Puttshack, located at 10 Southdale Center. Puttshack was an upscale, tech-infused mini golf experience to be located within the former Herberger’s building, above the Kowalski’s grocery store. He noted both the Kowalski’s and Puttshack spaces were currently under construction. Puttshack was proposing to have Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 8 foodservice on their outdoor rooftop patio and food and drinks served from inside the space. She shared the proposed hours of operation and spoke about amplified noise subject to the noise ordinance, required fencing, lighting ordinance, and other factors. The proposed rooftop patio was planned to have 153 seats and to accommodate the applicant’s request, a Conditional Use Permit for the rooftop dining was required in the Planned Commercial District. She shared site photos and referred to the proximity to residential uses and shared conditions of approvals. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Greg Drain, Puttshack, outlined their proposed business model that was similar to Top Golf for mini golf and provided photos with the goal and mission to allow everyone to play. He said they provided an inclusive and accessible space for all and provided places for the public to meet. He spoke about the proposed menu offerings and their focus on young families and providing corporate activity space as well. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:43 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing at noon on October 9, 2023, and continue action on Resolution No. 2023-65, approving a conditional use permit for Puttshack at 10 Southdale Center, to the October 17, 2023, Council meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-74; ACCEPTING DONATIONS - ADOPTED Member Pierce introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-74, accepting donations. Seconded by Member Jackson. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. IX.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2023-18; AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING MERCHANT CARRYOUT BAG REDUCTION – FIRST READING GRANTED Ms. Hancock shared that in 2022, City Council approved a work plan initiative for Edina's resident volunteer Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) to revise and update EEC’s 2017 report on possible recommendations for a plastic bag ordinance with a deliverable of an updated report with recommendations. She said the EEC recommended to the Council at their February 7, 2023, meeting that the City require merchants charge a $.05 fee to customers for carryout bags and requested the Council direct staff to draft an ordinance that updated City Code to include this requirement and implement an outreach plan to inform residents and businesses of this requirement. Council received this recommendation and directed staff to draft an ordinance and seek public feedback based on an April 2023 Council-approved public input plan implemented. She said staff brought the results of the public input process, along with a staff recommendation, to Council's July 18 work session. At that time, Council requested an ordinance for review. Ms. Hancock said this ordinance reflected the EEC recommendations then shared history of the ECC’s work and findings and purpose of the ordinance to reduce the threat of pollution, meet climate goals, and inspire behavior change away from disposable goods. She outlined the code summary that included a $0.05 fee charged to customers with fees to be retained by the merchant and include annual reporting and be effective July 2024 then reviewed the exceptions and exemptions. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 9 Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to grant First Reading of Ordinance 2023-18, amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser Nays: Hovland Motion carried. IX.C. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION; CENTURY HOMES PROGRAM – APPROVED Heritage Preservation Commission Chair Lonnquist (HPC) completed a 2022 work plan item that explored Century Homes Programs in other cities and defined the resources needed to launch one in Edina. In 2023, the Commission prepared all elements needed for a successful Century Homes Program to launch in January 2024. Program elements researched by the Commission included application materials, plaques, program guidelines, cost, and potential outreach that celebrated the history of homes at least 100 years old. She shared how the program would follow the Comprehensive Plan, expand the City’s preservation focus beyond the Country Club District, offer alternatives to heritage landmark designation, promote historical awareness, and reduce carbon emissions and rehab construction by encouraging renovations instead of new construction. The HPC consulted with the Edina Historical Society who voiced strong support for the program. They also verified the research resources they could offer interested homeowners and expressed interest in organizing future walking tours highlighting Century Homes throughout Edina. Chair Lonnquist said while the program’s implementation and oversight would be a staff operation, the HPC was proposing a 2024 work plan item to inform the public about the new Century Homes program and how they intended to draft materials to share in a mailing to all eligible property owners and in meetings with three community organizations. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to approve the Century Homes Program as outlined by the Heritage Preservation Commission and implement program in 2024. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. IX.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-59 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2023-20; ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR 4401 W. 76TH STREET (FIRE STATION #2) – ADOPTED Mr. Teague shared the City of Edina was proposing to tear down the existing 102,000 square foot building on the site to construct a new 36,000 square foot Fire Station. The building would provide operational space for the Edina Fire Department and Community Health Department. This facility would be located on the northern third of the site, with the remaining two-thirds of the site available for redevelopment that could include housing, retail, public buildings/uses and public space. This project would be a catalyst for implementing the Southdale Design Guidelines within this area. The large existing parking lot on the southern portion of the site would be seeded and the existing wetland on the southwest corner of the site would be restored. Future phases could include the potential subdivision of the site for development opportunities, including a greenway connection to the City’s Park system. He said as part of the sketch plan review, Trace Jacques of the BKV Group designed a couple of development scenarios for consideration. The scenarios were created based on the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines. During the sketch plan review there was not a definitive plan scenario selected for how that southern portion of the lot would develop; therefore, staff was not recommending PUD rezoning at this time. The future of that land could be decided upon by the City Council later. The proposed plans provide roadway and pedestrian access to that area on both the east and west sides of the site per the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Site Plan and Variances on a 5-3 vote and concerns of the project included the location of the proposed building on the site, not dividing the parcel Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 10 into smaller 200 x 200-foot parcels, utilizing the existing PID Zoning District and not rezoning to PUD with a master plan for the entire site. Fire Chief Slama shared statistics on increased calls for service and call volume that was only expected to continue to rise as the population aged then shared about parking and proposed station identifiers on the signage. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Agnew moved to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2023-20, amending the Zoning Ordinance to Allow Publicly Owned and Operated Civic and Cultural Institutions, including but not limited to Administrative Offices, Libraries, Public Safety Building and Places of Assembly as a Permitted Use in the PID, Planned Industrial Zoning District. Seconded by Member Jackson. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-59, Approving a Site Plan with Variances for Front Wall Signage, Side Wall Signage First Floor Building Height and Building Transparency Facing a Public Street for Fire Station #2 at 4401 76th Street West. Seconded by Member Pierce. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. IX.E. SKETCH PLAN FOR 5120 AND 5124 HANKERSON AVENUE – REVIEWED Mr. Teague shared the City Council was asked to consider a sketch plan request to tear down two existing single-dwelling units to build two double dwelling units. These sites would both gain access off the alley on the west side of the sites. The subject properties were zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and the site was guided low density residential, which allowed between 1-5 units per acre. The properties were 19,468 square feet in size (9,769 and 9,699 s.f. each) and the proposed density was 9 units per acre. He said the applicant has indicated they would seek the following if a formal application was made: a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, which would allow up to 12 units per acre; and Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Flexibility through the PUD would be setback, building coverage and lot area per dwelling, similar to the existing PUD to the south. Steve Behnke, Donnay Homes, shared their proposed plan adjacent to the successful Hankerson project that was fully occupied. He said there were a number of people interested in more rambler townhomes ramblers and how the proposed four units in two buildings would not be duplexed but townhomes, similar to the Grandview Townhomes in Edina. He said the proposal was for a Comprehensive Plan change due to density at 9 and medium density allowed up to 12, zoning from R-1 to PUD and an amendment that would benefit all units under same zoning and watershed. He commented on the height differences with regard to the existing neighborhood and how this was an extremely walkable area with an alley for vehicles and an urban front door feel. Mr. Behnke said the homes would be priced in the mid $800,000s and provide more density without overwhelming the neighborhood. Paul Donnay, Donnay Homes, shared his history in Edina and other locations and asked for the Council support as there was a need for this type of housing. He said while the Planning Commission had concerns, he noted Edina residents who were taxpayers for decades were looking to move from their current homes and remain in Edina and this housing type would work as it still had a lot and lawn and still be in City. He shared his successful work as president of HOAs for many projects until 75% occupancy was reached and that residents appreciated HOAs in these projects. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 3, 2023 Page 11 Dennis Bormfleth, 5124 Hankerson Avenue, spoke to the condition of the existing homes and affordable housing and the need to increase the density on this property which was supported by staff and the goal to develop the area. He shared their hope for four units and an overall good project and location. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. IX.F. SMALL AREA PLAN FOR THE LINCOLN DRIVE/HIGHWAY 169 NEIGHBORHOOD NODE – APPROVED Mr. Neal shared the proposed Small Area Plan (SAP) for the Lincoln Drive/Highway 169 Neighborhood Node which included the 19 acres north of Londonderry Drive, west of Lincoln Drive; and the 25.87 acres south of Londonderry Drive made up of 5901, 5816 and 5995 Lincoln Drive. He said staff recommended the SAP be placed on the 2024 Planning Commission work plan to be started in Quarter 1 of 2024. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve including the proposed Small Area Plan for the Lincoln Drive/Highway 169 neighborhood node on the 2024 Planning Commission work plan to be started in quarter 1 of 2024 as outlined by the 25.87 acres south of Londonderry Drive made up of 5901, 5816 and 5995 Lincoln Drive. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. X. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) - Received X.A. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMNET COMMISSION, AUGUST 10, 2023 MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, AUGUST 17, 2023 XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XI.A. PREP MEMO OCTOBER 3, 2023 XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to adjourn the meeting at 12:27 a.m. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 17, 2023. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 3, 2023, meeting available. MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2023 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser and Mayor Hovland Absent: Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director; Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager; Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner, Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner; Laura Fulton, Recreation Supervisor; Jeff Brown, Public Health Administrator; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Katie Bisek I.T. Specialist; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. 2024 COMMISSION PROPOSED WORK PLANS Commission chairs presented their proposed work plans for 2024 to Council. Community Engagement Manager Lamon said the proposed work plans would be considered by Council and staff in November and formally approved by the Council in December. Council asked questions and provided feedback. Commissioners present were Matt Doscotch, Hilda Martinez, Jasmine Stringer-Moore, Joni Bennett, Mary Absolon, Nick Mattison, Andy Lewis, Jimmy Bennett, Jane Lonnquist, and Laura Westlund. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, October 17, 2023. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Claims for Payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.29.23 TOTAL $4,829,852.64 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.29.23 TOTAL $18,074.39 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.29.23 TOTAL $550.00 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.06.23 TOTAL $3,674,133.19 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.29.23 TOTAL $4,829,852.64 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.29.23 TOTAL $18,074.39 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.29.23 TOTAL $550.00 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.06.23 TOTAL $3,674,133.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 48 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 591,908.792300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 1,790.002500 Conservation & Sustainability 212.402600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 159,590.542600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 56,151.714000 Capital Projects 418,174.694200 Equipment Replacement 17,583.184400 PIR Capital Projects 57,987.864600 MSA tracking 382,291.005100 Art Center 724.595200 Braemar Golf Course 41,660.325300 Aquatic Center 180.335400 Edinborough Park 23,956.135500 Braemar Arena 68,206.795600 Braemar Field 2,296.805700 Centennial Lakes 7,184.245800 Liquor 163,517.635900 Utility Fund 184,514.925900 Utility Fund 1,727,254.335900 Utility Fund 18,876.346000 Risk Management 392,635.736100 Equipment Operations 32,587.406200 Information Technology 436.246300 Facilities Management 3,249.647100 PS Training Facility 1,359.567200 MN Task Force 1 8,997.729000 Payroll 968,561.249999 Pooled Cash Fund 5,331,890.12 TOTAL 5,331,890.12 5,331,890.12 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Mallory Schauer ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 112 09/29/2023 WIRE 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 0001161922 08/30/2023 3,107.63 CHECK 112 TOTAL: 3,107.63 115 09/29/2023 WIRE 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 0001161973 09/01/2023 498,929.85 CHECK 115 TOTAL: 498,929.85 488301 09/29/2023 PRTD 100611 EDEN PRAIRIE RENTALS INC 177756 08/31/2023 20230929 297.00 CHECK 488301 TOTAL: 297.00 488302 09/29/2023 PRTD 143143 TORRES, ARMANDO CHAVEZ 2540 09/01/2023 20230929 464.59 CHECK 488302 TOTAL: 464.59 488303 09/29/2023 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916306028 08/08/2023 20230929 1,534.81 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916525073 09/12/2023 20230929 256.27 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916525116 09/12/2023 20230929 176.21 CHECK 488303 TOTAL: 1,967.29 488304 09/29/2023 PRTD 140318 ADVANCED ELEMENTS INC 88378 07/11/2023 20230929 5,789.00 CHECK 488304 TOTAL: 5,789.00 488305 09/29/2023 PRTD 120796 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS C146338 09/06/2023 20230929 132.00 CHECK 488305 TOTAL: 132.00 488306 09/29/2023 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LM3-DFYD-N3WX 08/30/2023 20230929 125.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YVP-HYXH-P3FK 08/30/2023 20230929 9.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DL7-JY39-QC96 08/30/2023 20230929 27.19 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16CK-6MRW-R6QK 08/30/2023 20230929 9.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LTM-LNPL-WT6R 08/31/2023 20230929 132.35 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WF6-Q7CH-XVFH 08/31/2023 20230929 41.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V49-KJVJ-XGG6 08/31/2023 20230929 250.11 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 14MR-FH7D-Y1N1 08/31/2023 20230929 10.68 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GWJ-1M67-CDYN 09/01/2023 20230929 91.04 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1X3T-TV74-PR9T 09/04/2023 20230929 37.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PHR-HNNJ-TK3F 09/04/2023 20230929 22.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1K34-K3TJ-RTH1 09/04/2023 20230929 315.90 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19Q3-YG4V-CVFY 09/14/2023 20230929 58.92 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VQP-1MRD-C4H9 09/15/2023 20230929 -177.99 CHECK 488306 TOTAL: 956.15 488307 09/29/2023 PRTD 132360 AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION INC FC-20-05 #6 08/07/2023 20230929 107,043.14 CHECK 488307 TOTAL: 107,043.14 488308 09/29/2023 PRTD 160510 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 2231536 08/17/2023 20230929 545.00 CHECK 488308 TOTAL: 545.00 488309 09/29/2023 PRTD 100595 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 235060 09/16/2023 20230929 500.00 CHECK 488309 TOTAL: 500.00 488310 09/29/2023 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1185 09/14/2023 20230929 84.00 CHECK 488310 TOTAL: 84.00 488311 09/29/2023 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 318658 08/25/2023 20230929 167.70 ASPEN MILLS INC 318660 08/25/2023 20230929 141.20 CHECK 488311 TOTAL: 308.90 488312 09/29/2023 PRTD 100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P28950 07/14/2023 20230929 -163.13 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02S34931 09/05/2023 20230929 7,708.15 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02S35087 09/05/2023 20230929 8,652.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488312 TOTAL: 16,197.07 488313 09/29/2023 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-989800 09/01/2023 20230929 261.23 CHECK 488313 TOTAL: 261.23 488314 09/29/2023 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 3085 09/13/2023 20230929 319.00 CHECK 488314 TOTAL: 319.00 488315 09/29/2023 PRTD 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LMV426078 09/11/2023 20230929 299.82 CHECK 488315 TOTAL: 299.82 488316 09/29/2023 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107371300 09/14/2023 20230929 28.63 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200831500 09/14/2023 20230929 402.45 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200833200 09/14/2023 20230929 910.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107363200 09/14/2023 20230929 277.57 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200831400 09/14/2023 20230929 760.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200831300 09/14/2023 20230929 210.15 CHECK 488316 TOTAL: 2,589.00 488317 09/29/2023 PRTD 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 161247 09/01/2023 20230929 840.41 CHECK 488317 TOTAL: 840.41 488318 09/29/2023 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5186400 09/06/2023 20230929 522.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5190348 09/21/2023 20230929 522.00 CHECK 488318 TOTAL: 1,044.00 488319 09/29/2023 PRTD 160787 THE NETWORK FOR BETTER FUTURES INV1336 08/31/2023 20230929 22,266.00 CHECK 488319 TOTAL: 22,266.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488320 09/29/2023 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14179 09/02/2021 20230929 351.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14178 09/02/2021 20230929 189.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14177 09/02/2021 20230929 351.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24164 09/13/2023 20230929 243.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24165 09/13/2023 20230929 441.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24163 09/13/2023 20230929 450.00 CHECK 488320 TOTAL: 2,025.00 488321 09/29/2023 PRTD 151149 BOARMAN KROOS VOGEL GROUP INC 62317 08/10/2023 20230929 24,279.81 CHECK 488321 TOTAL: 24,279.81 488322 09/29/2023 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0319470 08/31/2023 20230929 1,138.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 0318848 08/28/2023 20230929 3,667.90 BOLTON & MENK INC 0319780 08/31/2023 20230929 22,534.00 CHECK 488322 TOTAL: 27,340.40 488323 09/29/2023 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 199913 09/12/2023 20230929 452.00 CHECK 488323 TOTAL: 452.00 488324 09/29/2023 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 008P27557 08/31/2023 20230929 73.56 CHECK 488324 TOTAL: 73.56 488325 09/29/2023 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B356311 09/01/2023 20230929 8,531.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B357520 09/13/2023 20230929 2,764.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B354090 08/17/2023 20230929 1,060.62 CHECK 488325 TOTAL: 12,356.12 488326 09/29/2023 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106425 09/13/2023 20230929 1,439.93 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106424 09/13/2023 20230929 2,430.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106406 09/13/2023 20230929 2,068.05 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106407 09/13/2023 20230929 806.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106405 09/13/2023 20230929 4,423.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106423 09/13/2023 20230929 3,181.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112106422 09/13/2023 20230929 3,192.82 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 411344819 08/09/2023 20230929 -6.03 CHECK 488326 TOTAL: 17,536.17 488327 09/29/2023 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112084078 09/12/2023 20230929 3,322.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112084077 09/12/2023 20230929 229.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411360865 08/05/2023 20230929 -12.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411329605 08/16/2023 20230929 -246.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411329606 08/12/2023 20230929 -61.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411349477 08/19/2023 20230929 -12.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411360864 08/05/2023 20230929 -6.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411360863 08/05/2023 20230929 -10.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112084064 09/12/2023 20230929 179.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112084076 09/12/2023 20230929 641.40 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112084073 09/12/2023 20230929 368.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112084074 09/12/2023 20230929 30.80 CHECK 488327 TOTAL: 4,423.40 488328 09/29/2023 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1257314-1 08/21/2023 20230929 44.22 CHECK 488328 TOTAL: 44.22 488329 09/29/2023 PRTD 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 8-2023-2851 08/31/2023 20230929 19,508.23 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488329 TOTAL: 19,508.23 488330 09/29/2023 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2888357 09/15/2023 20230929 493.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2887204 09/13/2023 20230929 77.84 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2887202 09/13/2023 20230929 67.20 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2887206 09/13/2023 20230929 1,734.80 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2887203 09/09/2023 20230929 -401.10 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2887205 09/13/2023 20230929 314.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2888417 09/16/2023 20230929 1,102.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2888416 09/16/2023 20230929 191.20 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2890232 09/16/2023 20230929 -27.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2890233 09/20/2023 20230929 4,853.00 CHECK 488330 TOTAL: 8,405.69 488331 09/29/2023 PRTD 151132 CARDNO INC 2125681 09/01/2023 20230929 2,969.99 CHECK 488331 TOTAL: 2,969.99 488332 09/29/2023 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 7233981 08/16/2023 20230929 3,065.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 7251264 08/30/2023 20230929 834.00 CHECK 488332 TOTAL: 3,899.00 488333 09/29/2023 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV154906 08/31/2023 20230929 111.35 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV154907 08/31/2023 20230929 279.00 CHECK 488333 TOTAL: 390.35 488334 09/29/2023 PRTD 127227 COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS INC 15160 08/30/2023 22300031 20230929 7,600.00 CHECK 488334 TOTAL: 7,600.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488335 09/29/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166384373 08/31/2023 20230929 13.68 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166384352 08/31/2023 20230929 6.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166384247 08/31/2023 20230929 16.40 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166747714 09/05/2023 20230929 78.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166747700 09/05/2023 20230929 179.83 CHECK 488335 TOTAL: 294.56 488336 09/29/2023 PRTD 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 22558 09/12/2023 20230929 1,285.77 CHECK 488336 TOTAL: 1,285.77 488337 09/29/2023 PRTD 100087 CITY OF SAINT PAUL IN55441 09/15/2023 20230929 1,500.00 CHECK 488337 TOTAL: 1,500.00 488338 09/29/2023 PRTD 100087 SAINT PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT 23EP0005 09/01/2023 20230929 150.00 CHECK 488338 TOTAL: 150.00 488339 09/29/2023 PRTD 146213 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK SLPFD-09/23-1 09/01/2023 20230929 147.72 CHECK 488339 TOTAL: 147.72 488340 09/29/2023 PRTD 140274 CIVICPLUS LLC 273596 09/08/2023 20230929 543.50 CHECK 488340 TOTAL: 543.50 488341 09/29/2023 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 708693 09/14/2023 20230929 237.75 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 708818 09/13/2023 20230929 318.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 708819 09/13/2023 20230929 156.75 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 708577 09/13/2023 20230929 406.00 CHECK 488341 TOTAL: 1,118.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488342 09/29/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0373022-09/2023 09/17/2023 20230929 34.65 CHECK 488342 TOTAL: 34.65 488343 09/29/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0740105-09/2023 09/18/2023 20230929 86.50 CHECK 488343 TOTAL: 86.50 488344 09/29/2023 PRTD 141268 COMPLETELY IT TS-INV-12980 09/01/2023 20230929 649.00 CHECK 488344 TOTAL: 649.00 488345 09/29/2023 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103839071 09/13/2023 20230929 645.00 CHECK 488345 TOTAL: 645.00 488346 09/29/2023 PRTD 104928 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 35653 08/30/2023 20230929 650.00 CHECK 488346 TOTAL: 650.00 488347 09/29/2023 PRTD 151181 CORRECTIVE ASPHALT MATERALS, LLC 23088 08/31/2023 20230929 149,063.25 CHECK 488347 TOTAL: 149,063.25 488348 09/29/2023 PRTD 142772 CREATIVE ARCADE 1833 09/01/2023 20230929 950.00 CHECK 488348 TOTAL: 950.00 488349 09/29/2023 PRTD 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 3410265 08/29/2023 20230929 34,051.30 DAIKIN APPLIED Q-24007-1 08/30/2023 20230929 1,980.00 CHECK 488349 TOTAL: 36,031.30 488350 09/29/2023 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4120266 08/14/2023 20230929 766.56 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4120564 08/15/2023 20230929 111.38 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4128348 09/01/2023 20230929 337.08 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4119511 08/11/2023 20230929 701.08 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488350 TOTAL: 1,916.10 488351 09/29/2023 PRTD 160780 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1111 09/13/2023 20230929 244.00 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1106 09/13/2023 20230929 307.00 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1107 09/13/2023 20230929 405.00 CHECK 488351 TOTAL: 956.00 488352 09/29/2023 PRTD 148044 DAVIDSON, JEAN ERTEL 2306 08/28/2023 20230929 24,704.30 CHECK 488352 TOTAL: 24,704.30 488353 09/29/2023 PRTD 118189 DEM-CON COMPANIES LLC 16109 08/31/2023 20230929 355.44 CHECK 488353 TOTAL: 355.44 488354 09/29/2023 PRTD 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL 802236897 08/30/2023 20230929 2,992.50 DIAMOND VOGEL 802236686 08/30/2023 20230929 2,982.50 CHECK 488354 TOTAL: 5,975.00 488355 09/29/2023 PRTD 140357 DUDAK PRODUCTION INC 5403 08/30/2023 20230929 1,351.55 CHECK 488355 TOTAL: 1,351.55 488356 09/29/2023 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 962817 08/31/2023 20230929 83.30 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 962816 08/31/2023 20230929 107.10 CHECK 488356 TOTAL: 190.40 488357 09/29/2023 PRTD 160111 ECOELSA LLC 20230811 09/01/2023 20230929 385.00 CHECK 488357 TOTAL: 385.00 488358 09/29/2023 PRTD 136830 EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES 23-922 09/14/2023 20230929 1,996.00 CHECK 488358 TOTAL: 1,996.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488359 09/29/2023 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2579547 08/30/2023 20230929 260.58 CHECK 488359 TOTAL: 260.58 488360 09/29/2023 PRTD 136021 EPIC SOLUTIONS INC 14463 08/18/2023 20230929 8,670.00 CHECK 488360 TOTAL: 8,670.00 488361 09/29/2023 PRTD 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC DD6433 08/14/2023 20230929 5,048.00 CHECK 488361 TOTAL: 5,048.00 488362 09/29/2023 PRTD 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC P06879 08/28/2023 20230929 260.76 CHECK 488362 TOTAL: 260.76 488363 09/29/2023 PRTD 160613 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE 165911826 09/11/2023 20230929 16.70 CHECK 488363 TOTAL: 16.70 488364 09/29/2023 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-11605 09/14/2023 20230929 201.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-11596 09/14/2023 20230929 201.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-11603 09/14/2023 20230929 201.00 CHECK 488364 TOTAL: 603.00 488365 09/29/2023 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0515988 08/18/2023 20230929 20,429.99 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0510758-1 08/21/2023 20230929 4,569.92 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0517915 08/30/2023 20230929 2,237.98 CHECK 488365 TOTAL: 27,237.89 488366 09/29/2023 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 808905 08/30/2023 20230929 81.12 CHECK 488366 TOTAL: 81.12 488367 09/29/2023 PRTD 130699 FLEETPRIDE INC BRV014622 08/30/2023 20230929 256.91 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488367 TOTAL: 256.91 488368 09/29/2023 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1947501 08/30/2023 20230929 70.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1947942 08/30/2023 20230929 166.52 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1948841 08/31/2023 20230929 199.91 CHECK 488368 TOTAL: 436.43 488369 09/29/2023 PRTD 143454 GLEASON ENTERPRISES LLC 91305 05/22/2023 20230929 105.90 GLEASON ENTERPRISES LLC 91997 08/10/2023 20230929 46.68 GLEASON ENTERPRISES LLC 92044 08/11/2023 20230929 806.32 CHECK 488369 TOTAL: 958.90 488370 09/29/2023 PRTD 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 3080365 08/31/2023 20230929 1,761.75 CHECK 488370 TOTAL: 1,761.75 488371 09/29/2023 PRTD 160842 GOVHR USA LLC 1-08-23-524 09/05/2023 20230929 9,500.00 CHECK 488371 TOTAL: 9,500.00 488372 09/29/2023 PRTD 100781 MJ DONOVAN ENTERPRISES INC 152522 08/31/2023 20230929 121.72 CHECK 488372 TOTAL: 121.72 488373 09/29/2023 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9822375052 08/30/2023 20230929 90.57 WW GRAINGER 9822677994 08/30/2023 20230929 1,523.68 CHECK 488373 TOTAL: 1,614.25 488374 09/29/2023 PRTD 129248 GROTH, CHRISTOPHER Morningside C #1 08/11/2023 20230929 75,125.20 CHECK 488374 TOTAL: 75,125.20 488375 09/29/2023 PRTD 160347 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY LLC 230704 08/31/2023 20230929 17,583.18 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488375 TOTAL: 17,583.18 488376 09/29/2023 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6556992 08/16/2023 20230929 5,121.60 HAWKINS INC 6564638 08/28/2023 20230929 21,030.07 HAWKINS INC 6566891 08/30/2023 20230929 5,121.60 CHECK 488376 TOTAL: 31,273.27 488377 09/29/2023 PRTD 122093 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 124037657 09/11/2023 20230929 476,466.76 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 124006471 09/11/2023 20230929 24,062.69 CHECK 488377 TOTAL: 500,529.45 488378 09/29/2023 PRTD 122093 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 123255595 09/01/2023 20230929 455,434.68 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 123233266 09/01/2023 20230929 24,062.69 CHECK 488378 TOTAL: 479,497.37 488379 09/29/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000212117 09/01/2023 20230929 58.00 CHECK 488379 TOTAL: 58.00 488380 09/29/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000212269 09/06/2023 20230929 1,970.27 CHECK 488380 TOTAL: 1,970.27 488381 09/29/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000212224 09/06/2023 20230929 2,429.10 CHECK 488381 TOTAL: 2,429.10 488382 09/29/2023 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 645263 09/12/2023 20230929 2,343.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 645488 08/31/2023 20230929 -1,474.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 645268 09/12/2023 20230929 1,402.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 645482 09/12/2023 20230929 270.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 645490 09/12/2023 20230929 1,905.75 HOHENSTEINS INC 645489 09/12/2023 20230929 99.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488382 TOTAL: 4,545.25 488383 09/29/2023 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 16900 09/13/2023 20230929 144.00 CHECK 488383 TOTAL: 144.00 488384 09/29/2023 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 604636 08/31/2023 20230929 600.00 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 604651 09/01/2023 20230929 200.00 CHECK 488384 TOTAL: 800.00 488385 09/29/2023 PRTD 160653 INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 7600 09/14/2023 20230929 438.49 INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 7574 09/13/2023 20230929 110.74 CHECK 488385 TOTAL: 549.23 488386 09/29/2023 PRTD 160035 INTEGRATED PROCESS SOLUTIONS INC #18 PWK 20-003 08/31/2023 20230929 27,282.77 CHECK 488386 TOTAL: 27,282.77 488387 09/29/2023 PRTD 160768 I & S GROUP INC 96227 08/31/2023 20230929 2,110.00 I & S GROUP INC 96228 08/31/2023 20230929 7,126.25 I & S GROUP INC 96229 08/31/2023 20230929 2,065.00 CHECK 488387 TOTAL: 11,301.25 488388 09/29/2023 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC AUG Stmt 08/31/2023 20230929 96.03 CHECK 488388 TOTAL: 96.03 488389 09/29/2023 PRTD 100828 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 72898 08/30/2023 20230929 250.00 CHECK 488389 TOTAL: 250.00 488390 09/29/2023 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3628523 09/14/2023 20230929 1,558.25 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3628524 09/14/2023 20230929 3,689.75 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3628526 09/14/2023 20230929 1,578.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3628525 09/14/2023 20230929 36.90 CHECK 488390 TOTAL: 6,862.90 488391 09/29/2023 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658009 09/14/2023 20230929 212.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658010 09/14/2023 20230929 286.30 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658011 09/14/2023 20230929 521.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658013 09/14/2023 20230929 2,406.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658014 09/14/2023 20230929 2,947.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658012 09/14/2023 20230929 163.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658017 09/14/2023 20230929 1,431.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 697229 04/15/2023 20230929 -7.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 502042 06/03/2023 20230929 -22.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 502043 05/13/2023 20230929 -9.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 502044 07/01/2023 20230929 -10.08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 508230 08/29/2023 20230929 -30.00 CHECK 488391 TOTAL: 7,890.82 488392 09/29/2023 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7442774 09/14/2023 20230929 1,570.20 WINE MERCHANTS 7442775 09/14/2023 20230929 2,915.21 WINE MERCHANTS 7442778 09/14/2023 20230929 806.40 WINE MERCHANTS 7442776 09/14/2023 20230929 823.60 WINE MERCHANTS 7442777 09/14/2023 20230929 77.40 CHECK 488392 TOTAL: 6,192.81 488393 09/29/2023 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2377974 09/11/2023 20230929 5,239.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382765 09/14/2023 20230929 133.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382761 09/14/2023 20230929 100.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382764 09/14/2023 20230929 905.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382762 09/14/2023 20230929 437.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382766 09/14/2023 20230929 246.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382768 09/14/2023 20230929 864.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382775 09/14/2023 20230929 118.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382771 09/14/2023 20230929 3,128.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382769 09/14/2023 20230929 1,377.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382774 09/14/2023 20230929 604.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382773 09/14/2023 20230929 498.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382770 09/14/2023 20230929 1,867.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382772 09/14/2023 20230929 133.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382784 09/14/2023 20230929 2,760.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382779 09/14/2023 20230929 3,784.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382780 09/14/2023 20230929 867.67 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382763 09/14/2023 20230929 162.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382783 09/14/2023 20230929 619.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382767 09/14/2023 20230929 55.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382778 09/14/2023 20230929 2,536.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2382782 09/14/2023 20230929 1,390.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 250931 03/18/2023 20230929 -22.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 250932 04/29/2023 20230929 -19.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 250933 04/29/2023 20230929 -28.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 253529 05/26/2023 20230929 -28.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 253530 05/13/2023 20230929 -19.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 263419 07/15/2023 20230929 -13.34 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 263420 07/15/2023 20230929 -132.84 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 263421 07/15/2023 20230929 -6.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 264363 08/10/2023 20230929 -48.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 267085 09/02/2023 20230929 -17.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 267816 09/09/2023 20230929 -84.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 267817 09/14/2023 20230929 -108.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 251861 04/29/2023 20230929 -.67 CHECK 488393 TOTAL: 27,305.09 488394 09/29/2023 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 25906127 08/31/2023 20230929 4,259.84 CHECK 488394 TOTAL: 4,259.84 488395 09/29/2023 PRTD 139451 LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL INC 2134 08/31/2023 20230929 832.00 LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL INC 2086 08/30/2023 20230929 251.75 CHECK 488395 TOTAL: 1,083.75 488396 09/29/2023 PRTD 116876 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 11102787 08/31/2023 20230929 4.80 CHECK 488396 TOTAL: 4.80 488397 09/29/2023 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310887782 08/31/2023 20230929 978.19 CHECK 488397 TOTAL: 978.19 488398 09/29/2023 PRTD 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 08-2023 08/31/2023 20230929 22,466.50 CHECK 488398 TOTAL: 22,466.50 488399 09/29/2023 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 40002968-09/23 09/05/2023 20230929 333,186.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21418 09/01/2023 20230929 649.88 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21419 09/01/2023 20230929 392.42 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21266 09/01/2023 20230929 143.11 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21267 09/01/2023 20230929 7,887.94 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21302 09/01/2023 20230929 173.78 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21348 09/01/2023 20230929 1,418.53 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21349 09/01/2023 20230929 221.50 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21375 09/01/2023 20230929 176.05 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21382 09/01/2023 20230929 244.44 CHECK 488399 TOTAL: 344,493.65 488400 09/29/2023 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 62356 09/12/2023 20230929 1,092.20 LIBATION PROJECT 62357 09/12/2023 20230929 558.16 LIBATION PROJECT 62358 09/12/2023 20230929 502.12 CHECK 488400 TOTAL: 2,152.48 488401 09/29/2023 PRTD 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH A August 2023 08/31/2023 20230929 2,634.44 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH A September 2023 09/01/2023 20230929 2,650.84 CHECK 488401 TOTAL: 5,285.28 488402 09/29/2023 PRTD 160808 LINDERS SPECIALTY CO 72041 08/31/2023 20230929 3,270.00 CHECK 488402 TOTAL: 3,270.00 488403 09/29/2023 PRTD 160832 LOOPUP LLC 4976800 08/31/2023 20230929 2,859.54 CHECK 488403 TOTAL: 2,859.54 488404 09/29/2023 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 49053 09/12/2023 20230929 207.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 55753 09/12/2023 20230929 198.00 CHECK 488404 TOTAL: 405.00 488405 09/29/2023 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 122260 08/31/2023 20230929 360.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 122842 09/01/2023 20230929 3,885.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 122843 09/12/2023 20230929 330.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET LVC COMPANIES INC 122844 09/12/2023 20230929 547.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 122846 09/12/2023 20230929 780.00 CHECK 488405 TOTAL: 5,902.00 488406 09/29/2023 PRTD 160471 MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION INC ENG 22-15 #11 09/05/2023 20230929 1,166,787.58 CHECK 488406 TOTAL: 1,166,787.58 488407 09/29/2023 PRTD 160640 MARGE MAGNUSON CONSTRUCTION CO IN FC22-113 #5 08/31/2023 20230929 95,119.70 CHECK 488407 TOTAL: 95,119.70 488408 09/29/2023 PRTD 160297 MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC 2357 08/31/2023 20230929 160.00 CHECK 488408 TOTAL: 160.00 488409 09/29/2023 PRTD 116410 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40198955 08/29/2023 20230929 16,837.38 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40216533 08/30/2023 20230929 2,461.64 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40233684 08/31/2023 20230929 9,000.03 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40250231 08/31/2023 20230929 478.10 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 39907135 08/04/2023 20230929 6,842.50 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 39961020 08/09/2023 20230929 4,453.28 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 39907424 08/04/2023 20230929 33,988.32 CHECK 488409 TOTAL: 74,061.25 488410 09/29/2023 PRTD 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 15572 08/31/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488410 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488411 09/29/2023 PRTD 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0028349387 08/31/2023 20230929 281.87 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0028349846 08/31/2023 20230929 79.06 CHECK 488411 TOTAL: 360.93 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488412 09/29/2023 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067561 09/13/2023 20230929 331.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067555 09/13/2023 20230929 827.04 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067523 09/13/2023 20230929 699.00 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067556 09/13/2023 20230929 331.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067562 09/13/2023 20230929 827.04 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067521 09/13/2023 20230929 957.96 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067522 09/13/2023 20230929 844.32 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067572 09/13/2023 20230929 1,068.54 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067514 09/13/2023 20230929 241.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1067537 09/13/2023 20230929 331.50 CHECK 488412 TOTAL: 6,459.90 488413 09/29/2023 PRTD 143704 MCCARTY, STEPHEN 23EP0007 09/01/2023 20230929 150.00 CHECK 488413 TOTAL: 150.00 488414 09/29/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 88103 08/30/2023 20230929 151.90 MENARDS 88180 08/31/2023 20230929 113.43 MENARDS 88261 09/01/2023 20230929 154.24 MENARDS 85943 07/27/2023 20230929 258.22 CHECK 488414 TOTAL: 677.79 488415 09/29/2023 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 532281 08/02/2023 20230929 3,400.12 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 532450 08/31/2023 20230929 41.85 CHECK 488415 TOTAL: 3,441.97 488416 09/29/2023 PRTD 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 00114919 08/31/2023 20230929 107.42 CHECK 488416 TOTAL: 107.42 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488417 09/29/2023 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P04008 08/30/2023 20230929 282.49 CHECK 488417 TOTAL: 282.49 488418 09/29/2023 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT P05101 08/31/2023 20230929 44.84 CHECK 488418 TOTAL: 44.84 488419 09/29/2023 PRTD 160511 MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION 2023 DUES-HOVLAND 09/01/2023 20230929 30.00 CHECK 488419 TOTAL: 30.00 488420 09/29/2023 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 34979 07/28/2023 20230929 4.18 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 62671 08/15/2023 20230929 141.90 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35102 08/19/2023 20230929 84.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35151 08/31/2023 20230929 52.21 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35163 09/02/2023 20230929 17.50 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35176 09/07/2023 20230929 34.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35147 08/31/2023 20230929 34.60 CHECK 488420 TOTAL: 368.39 488421 09/29/2023 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-31879 06/07/2022 20230929 174.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-31881 06/07/2022 20230929 187.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-31880 06/07/2022 20230929 183.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-44456 09/12/2023 20230929 237.17 MODIST BREWING LLC E-44445 09/12/2023 20230929 205.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-44455 09/12/2023 20230929 71.00 CHECK 488421 TOTAL: 1,057.17 488422 09/29/2023 PRTD 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT INC 149085 08/31/2023 20230929 600.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488422 TOTAL: 600.00 488423 09/29/2023 PRTD 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 23EP0006 09/14/2023 20230929 250.00 CHECK 488423 TOTAL: 250.00 488424 09/29/2023 PRTD 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 5812 08/30/2023 20230929 465.00 CHECK 488424 TOTAL: 465.00 488425 09/29/2023 PRTD 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN1923537 08/23/2023 20230929 8,850.00 CHECK 488425 TOTAL: 8,850.00 488426 09/29/2023 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 210877 09/13/2023 20230929 331.50 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 210876 09/13/2023 20230929 343.50 CHECK 488426 TOTAL: 675.00 488427 09/29/2023 PRTD 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC 9045 08/07/2023 20230929 3,901.57 CHECK 488427 TOTAL: 3,901.57 488428 09/29/2023 PRTD 150864 RUSTAO, THOMAS J KBS Tour Lite 09/01/2023 20230929 85.00 CHECK 488428 TOTAL: 85.00 488429 09/29/2023 PRTD 142880 NORDIC SOLAR HOLDCO LLC INV-NSH003887 08/31/2023 20230929 10,531.39 CHECK 488429 TOTAL: 10,531.39 488430 09/29/2023 PRTD 160033 OLD WORLD BEER LLC 3005 09/12/2023 20230929 313.99 OLD WORLD BEER LLC 3004 09/12/2023 20230929 214.80 CHECK 488430 TOTAL: 528.79 488431 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Griffin, Mark 273-23-2475 08/22/2023 20230929 208.00 CHECK 488431 TOTAL: 208.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488432 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 LI, KAM 273-21-4943-REFUND 12/21/2021 20230929 82.51 CHECK 488432 TOTAL: 82.51 488433 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Overstreet, John 273-23-2208 08/22/2023 20230929 108.30 CHECK 488433 TOTAL: 108.30 488434 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Reis, Amber 273-23-2666 08/22/2023 20230929 1,147.82 CHECK 488434 TOTAL: 1,147.82 488435 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Rerat, Shirley 273-23-2176 08/22/2023 20230929 90.61 CHECK 488435 TOTAL: 90.61 488436 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Sorbel, Joanne 273-23-1924 08/22/2023 20230929 107.60 CHECK 488436 TOTAL: 107.60 488437 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Stratmoen, Gladys 273-23-1339 08/22/2023 20230929 1,227.00 CHECK 488437 TOTAL: 1,227.00 488438 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 TJB HOMES INC ED204626-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488438 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488439 09/29/2023 PRTD 999998 Virasami, Domatie 273-23-1666 08/22/2023 20230929 46.98 CHECK 488439 TOTAL: 46.98 488440 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Adriatic Construction LLC ED198121-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 9,890.00 CHECK 488440 TOTAL: 9,890.00 488441 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Bellin Construction Services LLC ED186778-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 8,510.00 CHECK 488441 TOTAL: 8,510.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488442 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 BOLLIG & SONS ED206682-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488442 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488443 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Bollig & Sons ED205282-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488443 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488444 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 City Homes Design & Build, LLC ED196672-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 10,000.00 CHECK 488444 TOTAL: 10,000.00 488445 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 City Line Homes INC ED204302-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488445 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488446 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED199696-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488446 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488447 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED198157-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488447 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488448 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED190930-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488448 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488449 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED199103-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 9,890.00 CHECK 488449 TOTAL: 9,890.00 488450 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED200139-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 9,890.00 CHECK 488450 TOTAL: 9,890.00 488451 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED200781-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488451 TOTAL: 2,500.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488452 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 DONNAY HOMES ED199508-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 10,000.00 CHECK 488452 TOTAL: 10,000.00 488453 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Dream Homes Inc ED203283-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488453 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488454 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Dream Homes Inc ED207251-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488454 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488455 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Dreher, Benjamin ED204397-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488455 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488456 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Dwyer, Andrea ED185645-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 10,000.00 CHECK 488456 TOTAL: 10,000.00 488457 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 GONYEA HOMES INC ED193406-Refund 09/26/2023 20230929 9,560.00 CHECK 488457 TOTAL: 9,560.00 488458 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 HANSEN CONSTRUCTION OF EDINA, INC ED190365-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 9,670.00 CHECK 488458 TOTAL: 9,670.00 488459 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Heiman Construction Inc ED186076-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 9,670.00 CHECK 488459 TOTAL: 9,670.00 488460 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 LDK Builders ED199203-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 10,000.00 CHECK 488460 TOTAL: 10,000.00 488461 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 LDK Builders ED188152-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 9,230.00 CHECK 488461 TOTAL: 9,230.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488462 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 MISSION CONSTRUCTION ED205029-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488462 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488463 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Neutgens Excavating ED202404-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488463 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488464 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 NR Properties ED198481-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 10,000.00 CHECK 488464 TOTAL: 10,000.00 488465 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 NR Properties ED198480-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488465 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488466 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 NR Properties ED202954-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488466 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488467 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 NR Properties Inc ED198509-Refund 09/15/2023 20230929 9,780.00 CHECK 488467 TOTAL: 9,780.00 488468 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Preferred Contracting and Constru ED208542-Refund 09/08/2023 20230929 112.90 CHECK 488468 TOTAL: 112.90 488469 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 RL Investments LLC ED202612-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 2,500.00 CHECK 488469 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488470 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 SILVER TREE PLUMBING & HEATING ED208576-Refund 09/12/2023 20230929 65.40 CHECK 488470 TOTAL: 65.40 488471 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 STONE COTTAGE CONSTRUCTION, INC ED190860-Refund 09/26/2023 20230929 9,120.00 CHECK 488471 TOTAL: 9,120.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488472 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 STONEPOCKET INC ED208172-Refund 09/07/2023 20230929 207.81 CHECK 488472 TOTAL: 207.81 488473 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Sullivan Renovations Inc ED193746-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 9,780.00 CHECK 488473 TOTAL: 9,780.00 488474 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 TRADITIONS BY DONNAY HOMES LLC ED206389-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 2,350.00 CHECK 488474 TOTAL: 2,350.00 488475 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 TRII INC ED208801-Refund 09/19/2023 20230929 1,450.00 CHECK 488475 TOTAL: 1,450.00 488476 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 Urban Edge Homes LLC ED192112-Refund 09/18/2023 20230929 9,780.00 CHECK 488476 TOTAL: 9,780.00 488477 09/29/2023 PRTD 999995 WS & D Permit Service Inc. ED208380-Refund 09/07/2023 20230929 247.96 CHECK 488477 TOTAL: 247.96 488478 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 ALL STAR CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL ED178063-REFUND 04/29/2020 20230929 335.63 CHECK 488478 TOTAL: 335.63 488479 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 STAUFFER, PAM 1239651-REFUND 07/02/2020 20230929 200.00 CHECK 488479 TOTAL: 200.00 488480 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 VANDERHAEGHEN, CHARLOTTE 121619 12/16/2019 20230929 67.16 CHECK 488480 TOTAL: 67.16 488481 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 AT&T Services Inc FA14803671-09/2023 09/27/2023 20230929 2,366.00 CHECK 488481 TOTAL: 2,366.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488482 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 Brohl, Brett 499 09/26/2023 20230929 520.00 CHECK 488482 TOTAL: 520.00 488483 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 Geelan, John 235568 09/26/2023 20230929 420.00 CHECK 488483 TOTAL: 420.00 488484 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 HAVEL ROCK & GRAVEL, INC ED193495-REFUND 12/07/2021 20230929 54.96 CHECK 488484 TOTAL: 54.96 488485 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 LESLIE RICHARD 4747 02/24/2021 20230929 60.00 CHECK 488485 TOTAL: 60.00 488486 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 MN Court Interpreter Program Cert Exam 9/23 09/20/2023 20230929 300.00 CHECK 488486 TOTAL: 300.00 488487 09/29/2023 PRTD 999994 Quinn, Gavin Irrigation refund 09/26/2023 20230929 575.34 CHECK 488487 TOTAL: 575.34 488488 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Allen, Julie 37652738-REFUND 04/15/2022 20230929 75.00 CHECK 488488 TOTAL: 75.00 488489 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Borg, Tricia 1258465-REFUND-BORG 08/27/2021 20230929 90.00 CHECK 488489 TOTAL: 90.00 488490 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Chrysler, Gina acref -Chrys 07/02/2021 20230929 12.77 CHECK 488490 TOTAL: 12.77 488491 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Dusil, Krista 1352681 06/22/2021 20230929 165.00 CHECK 488491 TOTAL: 165.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488492 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Edina Community Lutheran Church P&RrefEdina2 07/08/2021 20230929 1.88 CHECK 488492 TOTAL: 1.88 488493 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Ficocello, Whitney acref -Ficoc 07/02/2021 20230929 7.41 CHECK 488493 TOTAL: 7.41 488494 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Grau, Luci 58962496-Refund 08/04/2023 20230929 95.00 CHECK 488494 TOTAL: 95.00 488495 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Johnson, Sue acref -Johns9 07/02/2021 20230929 7.41 CHECK 488495 TOTAL: 7.41 488496 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Knox, Nathan REFUNDKnox, Nathan 08/03/2021 20230929 17.50 CHECK 488496 TOTAL: 17.50 488497 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Lee, Robyn acref -Lee 07/02/2021 20230929 24.15 CHECK 488497 TOTAL: 24.15 488498 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Mayva Broanian 33343732-REFUND 10/25/2021 20230929 10.00 CHECK 488498 TOTAL: 10.00 488499 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Mcmenamy, Nanci acref -Mcmen 07/02/2021 20230929 16.35 CHECK 488499 TOTAL: 16.35 488500 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Rea, Miriam acref -Rea 07/02/2021 20230929 7.41 CHECK 488500 TOTAL: 7.41 488501 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Rose, Nina acref -Rose 07/02/2021 20230929 21.00 CHECK 488501 TOTAL: 21.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488502 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Sikora, Molly S acref -Sikor 07/02/2021 20230929 31.06 CHECK 488502 TOTAL: 31.06 488503 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Strickland, Leah acref -Stric 07/02/2021 20230929 27.80 CHECK 488503 TOTAL: 27.80 488504 09/29/2023 PRTD 999996 Vecchio-Smith, Margaret acref -Vecch 07/02/2021 20230929 24.97 CHECK 488504 TOTAL: 24.97 488505 09/29/2023 PRTD 999997 KOKKOLI, EFROSINI 0203322001 07/20/2018 20230929 6.91 CHECK 488505 TOTAL: 6.91 488506 09/29/2023 PRTD 999997 SINGH, HARPREET 00117309-111801006 02/12/2021 20230929 127.64 CHECK 488506 TOTAL: 127.64 488507 09/29/2023 PRTD 999997 MALIN,PATRICIA 00088943-07/19/21 07/19/2021 20230929 125.00 CHECK 488507 TOTAL: 125.00 488508 09/29/2023 PRTD 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC 77919 08/30/2023 20230929 59.86 CHECK 488508 TOTAL: 59.86 488509 09/29/2023 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 213092 09/12/2023 20230929 1,599.50 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 213075 09/12/2023 20230929 2,468.40 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 213081 09/12/2023 20230929 1,642.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 213080 09/12/2023 20230929 1,104.00 CHECK 488509 TOTAL: 6,813.90 488510 09/29/2023 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 18239304 09/18/2023 20230929 -4.48 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 18239303 09/18/2023 20230929 408.50 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 17699055 09/20/2023 20230929 321.24 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488510 TOTAL: 725.26 488511 09/29/2023 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-203971 09/14/2023 20230929 212.40 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-204021 09/14/2023 20230929 60.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-204022 09/14/2023 20230929 301.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-203920 09/14/2023 20230929 223.70 CHECK 488511 TOTAL: 797.60 488512 09/29/2023 PRTD 120831 1ST SCRIBE INC 260818 09/01/2023 20230929 425.00 CHECK 488512 TOTAL: 425.00 488513 09/29/2023 PRTD 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES INC 2 08/30/2023 22200070 20230929 71,767.80 CHECK 488513 TOTAL: 71,767.80 488514 09/29/2023 PRTD 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES INC 53277 08/31/2023 20230929 1,285.35 CHECK 488514 TOTAL: 1,285.35 488515 09/29/2023 PRTD 160501 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 13888768 09/01/2023 20230929 3,345.04 CHECK 488515 TOTAL: 3,345.04 488516 09/29/2023 PRTD 160794 PILMARK LLC 208160-090123 09/01/2023 20230929 2,681.56 CHECK 488516 TOTAL: 2,681.56 488517 09/29/2023 PRTD 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 64164 08/31/2023 20230929 2,184.00 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 64165 08/31/2023 20230929 2,173.42 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 64272 08/31/2023 20230929 6,564.55 CHECK 488517 TOTAL: 10,921.97 488518 09/29/2023 PRTD 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135139 09/01/2023 20230929 872.17 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135246 09/01/2023 20230929 1,243.58 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135267 09/01/2023 20230929 471.43 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135263 09/01/2023 20230929 911.85 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135265 09/01/2023 20230929 1,154.15 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135266 09/01/2023 20230929 567.27 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135264 09/01/2023 20230929 994.71 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135268 09/01/2023 20230929 471.43 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135274 09/01/2023 20230929 1,147.38 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 135272 09/01/2023 20230929 713.20 CHECK 488518 TOTAL: 8,547.17 488519 09/29/2023 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 111289 08/31/2023 20230929 145.20 CHECK 488519 TOTAL: 145.20 488520 09/29/2023 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-61542 09/14/2023 20230929 462.00 CHECK 488520 TOTAL: 462.00 488521 09/29/2023 PRTD 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE 4000720 08/31/2023 20230929 20.08 CHECK 488521 TOTAL: 20.08 488522 09/29/2023 PRTD 160246 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 8365-08/01/2023 08/01/2023 20230929 -538.98 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 9732-09/23 09/08/2023 20230929 1,090.22 CHECK 488522 TOTAL: 551.24 488523 09/29/2023 PRTD 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC 60275 08/11/2023 20230929 139.92 CHECK 488523 TOTAL: 139.92 488524 09/29/2023 PRTD 124390 RAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 34021 08/28/2023 20230929 11,812.30 CHECK 488524 TOTAL: 11,812.30 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488525 09/29/2023 PRTD 160318 RAPP STRATEGIES INC 1650 08/31/2023 20230929 3,350.00 CHECK 488525 TOTAL: 3,350.00 488526 09/29/2023 PRTD 125936 REINDERS INC 3098537-00 08/31/2023 20230929 117.33 CHECK 488526 TOTAL: 117.33 488527 09/29/2023 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 88121 08/31/2023 20230929 342.50 CHECK 488527 TOTAL: 342.50 488528 09/29/2023 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 791188 08/30/2023 20230929 212.30 CHECK 488528 TOTAL: 212.30 488529 09/29/2023 PRTD 160330 RYPSTICK GOLF 11862 09/01/2023 20230929 143.79 CHECK 488529 TOTAL: 143.79 488530 09/29/2023 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC ENG 23-5-1 08/11/2023 20230929 159,590.54 CHECK 488530 TOTAL: 159,590.54 488531 09/29/2023 PRTD 160255 SACHS, FRANK D 000143 04/14/2022 20230929 200.00 CHECK 488531 TOTAL: 200.00 488532 09/29/2023 PRTD 117099 EARL F ANDERSEN INC 0133673-IN 08/23/2023 20230929 5,205.00 CHECK 488532 TOTAL: 5,205.00 488533 09/29/2023 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 116856 08/31/2023 20230929 959.56 CHECK 488533 TOTAL: 959.56 488534 09/29/2023 PRTD 160574 JEAN, SANDRA 12-2023 09/02/2023 20230929 800.00 CHECK 488534 TOTAL: 800.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488535 09/29/2023 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP INC 69930 09/01/2023 20230929 1,000.00 RUSCIANO GROUP INC 69931 09/01/2023 20230929 1,000.00 CHECK 488535 TOTAL: 2,000.00 488536 09/29/2023 PRTD 134643 SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUN 1441 08/31/2023 20230929 1,424.50 SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUN 1110 05/31/2023 20230929 4,471.56 CHECK 488536 TOTAL: 5,896.06 488537 09/29/2023 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2938550 09/14/2023 20230929 118.74 KELBRO COMPANY 2938471 09/14/2023 20230929 275.41 CHECK 488537 TOTAL: 394.15 488538 09/29/2023 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 452253 09/11/2023 20230929 56,151.71 CHECK 488538 TOTAL: 56,151.71 488539 09/29/2023 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0006970 08/31/2023 20230929 53.19 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0007356 09/01/2023 20230929 35.46 CHECK 488539 TOTAL: 88.65 488540 09/29/2023 PRTD 140243 PK BLOODY MARY CORP 2309 08/21/2023 20230929 82.68 CHECK 488540 TOTAL: 82.68 488541 09/29/2023 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18602 08/29/2023 20230929 48.91 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18614 09/01/2023 20230929 299.96 CHECK 488541 TOTAL: 348.87 488542 09/29/2023 PRTD 160451 SIGN SOLUTIONS USA LLC 406564 06/13/2023 20230929 7,367.50 CHECK 488542 TOTAL: 7,367.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488543 09/29/2023 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134001713-001 08/30/2023 20230929 644.53 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134096780-001 09/01/2023 20230929 51.02 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134101472-001 09/01/2023 20230929 28.92 CHECK 488543 TOTAL: 724.47 488544 09/29/2023 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN69138 09/12/2023 20230929 1,238.58 SMALL LOT MN MN69139 09/13/2023 20230929 89.34 SMALL LOT MN MN69140 09/13/2023 20230929 332.96 SMALL LOT MN MN69141 09/12/2023 20230929 365.00 CHECK 488544 TOTAL: 2,025.88 488545 09/29/2023 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INCORPORATED ARS/16593084 09/01/2023 20230929 115.00 CHECK 488545 TOTAL: 115.00 488546 09/29/2023 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 125673012 09/01/2023 20230929 103.61 CHECK 488546 TOTAL: 103.61 488547 09/29/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389562 09/13/2023 20230929 2,028.25 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389564 09/13/2023 20230929 1,591.91 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389565 09/13/2023 20230929 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389566 09/13/2023 20230929 893.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389563 09/13/2023 20230929 316.32 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389569 09/13/2023 20230929 523.31 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9537837 09/13/2023 20230929 -392.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389571 09/12/2023 20230929 4,362.23 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389570 09/13/2023 20230929 41.29 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389567 09/13/2023 20230929 579.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389568 09/13/2023 20230929 4,083.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389572 09/13/2023 20230929 2,496.30 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389573 09/13/2023 20230929 579.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389575 09/13/2023 20230929 4,139.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389576 09/13/2023 20230929 82.58 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389577 09/13/2023 20230929 212.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2389574 09/13/2023 20230929 1,992.51 CHECK 488547 TOTAL: 23,627.10 488548 09/29/2023 PRTD 160274 SOUTHWEST LAWN, SNOW & LANDSCAPE 4037 09/01/2023 20230929 1,868.00 CHECK 488548 TOTAL: 1,868.00 488549 09/29/2023 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 67273 09/15/2023 20230929 52,430.75 CHECK 488549 TOTAL: 52,430.75 488550 09/29/2023 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 2 LLC 68137 09/15/2023 20230929 10,967.34 CHECK 488550 TOTAL: 10,967.34 488551 09/29/2023 PRTD 160346 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY Aug 2023 08/01/2023 20230929 7,330.94 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY Sept 2023 09/01/2023 20230929 7,333.14 CHECK 488551 TOTAL: 14,664.08 488552 09/29/2023 PRTD 100438 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC 2122038 08/25/2023 20230929 1,790.00 CHECK 488552 TOTAL: 1,790.00 488553 09/29/2023 PRTD 101007 STAR TRIBUNE MEDIA INTERMEDIATE H I00463153-08202023 08/31/2023 20230929 5,142.86 CHECK 488553 TOTAL: 5,142.86 488554 09/29/2023 PRTD 160368 STARCHASE LLC 20132763 07/31/2023 20230929 1,750.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 36 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488554 TOTAL: 1,750.00 488555 09/29/2023 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 51769 09/13/2023 20230929 180.00 CHECK 488555 TOTAL: 180.00 488556 09/29/2023 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10196079 08/30/2023 20230929 401.20 CHECK 488556 TOTAL: 401.20 488557 09/29/2023 PRTD 135803 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Aug 2023 #2 08/01/2023 20230929 2,769.58 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Sept 2023 #2 09/01/2023 20230929 2,771.53 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Aug 2023 #1 08/01/2023 20230929 5,564.24 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Sept 2023 #1 09/01/2023 20230929 5,605.09 CHECK 488557 TOTAL: 16,710.44 488558 09/29/2023 PRTD 100991 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE INV200312 08/31/2023 20230929 254.00 CHECK 488558 TOTAL: 254.00 488559 09/29/2023 PRTD 151143 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 3779 09/13/2023 20230929 230.00 CHECK 488559 TOTAL: 230.00 488560 09/29/2023 PRTD 160815 TANGLETOWN GARDENS LLC 11669 08/25/2023 20230929 1,500.00 CHECK 488560 TOTAL: 1,500.00 488561 09/29/2023 PRTD 160414 TEGRA GROUP INC 424.823 08/01/2023 20230929 6,600.00 CHECK 488561 TOTAL: 6,600.00 488562 09/29/2023 PRTD 160489 TELUS COMMUNICATIONS (U.S.) INC 1215 09/01/2023 20230929 48.00 CHECK 488562 TOTAL: 48.00 488563 09/29/2023 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M28499 09/01/2023 20230929 1,013.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 37 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488563 TOTAL: 1,013.50 488564 09/29/2023 PRTD 102742 TOLTZ KING DUVALL ANDERSON & ASSO 002023004526 09/01/2023 20230929 56,318.28 CHECK 488564 TOTAL: 56,318.28 488565 09/29/2023 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 40181001 08/31/2023 20230929 50.84 CHECK 488565 TOTAL: 50.84 488566 09/29/2023 PRTD 104064 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 269634-202308-1 09/01/2023 20230929 777.40 CHECK 488566 TOTAL: 777.40 488567 09/29/2023 PRTD 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC 0746302-IN 08/30/2023 20230929 1,330.72 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC 0746408-IN 08/30/2023 20230929 562.84 CHECK 488567 TOTAL: 1,893.56 488568 09/29/2023 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 55198 08/30/2023 20230929 60.00 CHECK 488568 TOTAL: 60.00 488569 09/29/2023 PRTD 101049 UHL COMPANY INC 72155 06/29/2023 20230929 31,863.80 CHECK 488569 TOTAL: 31,863.80 488570 09/29/2023 PRTD 100689 ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC 206945 08/11/2023 20230929 5,020.08 CHECK 488570 TOTAL: 5,020.08 488571 09/29/2023 PRTD 142790 UNDERGROUND UTILITY SPECIALTIES I 539 08/17/2023 20230929 9,830.00 CHECK 488571 TOTAL: 9,830.00 488572 09/29/2023 PRTD 160648 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 14100008743 09/01/2023 20230929 42.55 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410008744 09/04/2023 20230929 34.03 CHECK 488572 TOTAL: 76.58 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 38 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488573 09/29/2023 PRTD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC, LLC 150-0071074-01 09/08/2023 20230929 309.00 CHECK 488573 TOTAL: 309.00 488574 09/29/2023 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2907 09/14/2023 20230929 100.00 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2906 09/14/2023 20230929 100.00 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-2908 09/14/2023 20230929 285.00 CHECK 488574 TOTAL: 485.00 488575 09/29/2023 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 67192 09/15/2023 20230929 6,822.67 CHECK 488575 TOTAL: 6,822.67 488576 09/29/2023 PRTD 103590 VALLEY-RICH COMPANY INC 32341 08/22/2023 20230929 11,197.00 VALLEY-RICH COMPANY INC 32472 09/02/2023 20230929 8,090.00 CHECK 488576 TOTAL: 19,287.00 488577 09/29/2023 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 047201 09/05/2023 20230929 826.97 CHECK 488577 TOTAL: 826.97 488578 09/29/2023 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 4928 09/13/2023 20230929 228.67 CHECK 488578 TOTAL: 228.67 488579 09/29/2023 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 106600 09/01/2023 20230929 7,138.00 VERSATILE VEHICLES 106599 09/01/2023 20230929 1,164.94 CHECK 488579 TOTAL: 8,302.94 488580 09/29/2023 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007272702.001 08/31/2023 20230929 212.40 CHECK 488580 TOTAL: 212.40 488581 09/29/2023 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0336353-IN 09/14/2023 20230929 217.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0336354-IN 09/14/2023 20230929 642.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 39 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET VINOCOPIA INC 0336352-IN 09/14/2023 20230929 758.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0336334-IN 09/14/2023 20230929 121.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0336333-IN 09/14/2023 20230929 172.25 CHECK 488581 TOTAL: 1,911.00 488582 09/29/2023 PRTD 160301 VISION INC 125981 08/31/2023 20230929 1,274.97 CHECK 488582 TOTAL: 1,274.97 488583 09/29/2023 PRTD 106699 WALSER HOLDING COMPANY INC 68567 08/06/2020 20230929 126.04 CHECK 488583 TOTAL: 126.04 488584 09/29/2023 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 246180 09/13/2023 20230929 1,764.00 WINE COMPANY 246179 09/13/2023 20230929 114.00 WINE COMPANY 246178 09/13/2023 20230929 194.00 WINE COMPANY 246177 09/13/2023 20230929 1,938.00 WINE COMPANY 246176 09/13/2023 20230929 3,404.10 CHECK 488584 TOTAL: 7,414.10 488585 09/29/2023 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00136200 09/12/2023 20230929 432.00 CHECK 488585 TOTAL: 432.00 488586 09/29/2023 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4564 09/13/2023 20230929 236.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4572 09/14/2023 20230929 382.20 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4571 09/14/2023 20230929 543.90 CHECK 488586 TOTAL: 1,162.20 488587 09/29/2023 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000497 09/14/2023 20230929 134.40 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000496 09/14/2023 20230929 134.40 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000493 09/12/2023 20230929 201.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/28/2023 10:17User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 40 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488587 TOTAL: 470.40 488588 09/29/2023 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-001505 09/12/2023 20230929 94.00 CHECK 488588 TOTAL: 94.00 488589 09/29/2023 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-022328-000 - 5 08/31/2023 20230929 2,104.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-022453-000-5 08/31/2023 20230929 4,405.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-021930-000 - 8 08/31/2023 20230929 5,157.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-023408-000 - 1 08/31/2023 20230929 515.00 CHECK 488589 TOTAL: 12,181.75 488590 09/29/2023 PRTD 100932 XCEL ENERGY 1057133927 08/22/2023 20230929 382,291.00 CHECK 488590 TOTAL: 382,291.00 488591 09/29/2023 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 24262 08/24/2023 20230929 2,775.72 CHECK 488591 TOTAL: 2,775.72 488592 09/29/2023 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN001146608 09/02/2023 20230929 81.62 CHECK 488592 TOTAL: 81.62 NUMBER OF CHECKS 294 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 5,331,890.12 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 292 4,829,852.64 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS 2 502,037.48 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 5,331,890.12 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/29/2023 11:21User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 5800 Liquor 18,074.399999 Pooled Cash Fund 18,074.39 TOTAL 18,074.39 18,074.39 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/29/2023 11:21User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488593 09/29/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9531420 05/13/2023 20230930 -24.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2379311 08/16/2023 20230930 1,197.70 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2379312 08/16/2023 20230930 277.38 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2379310 08/16/2023 20230930 332.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2379309 08/16/2023 20230930 964.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2379313 08/16/2023 20230930 2,287.92 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381974 08/23/2023 20230930 1,146.46 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381973 08/23/2023 20230930 270.71 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381976 08/23/2023 20230930 194.32 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381975 08/23/2023 20230930 1,888.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381977 08/23/2023 20230930 409.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381980 08/23/2023 20230930 285.12 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381982 08/23/2023 20230930 208.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381981 08/23/2023 20230930 884.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381978 08/23/2023 20230930 518.96 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381985 08/23/2023 20230930 1,041.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381984 08/23/2023 20230930 559.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381986 08/23/2023 20230930 902.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381987 08/23/2023 20230930 676.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2381983 08/23/2023 20230930 4,104.42 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9531124 08/29/2023 20230930 -54.00 CHECK 488593 TOTAL: 18,074.39 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/29/2023 11:21User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 18,074.39 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 1 18,074.39 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 18,074.39 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/29/2023 13:27User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 5400 Edinborough Park 550.009999 Pooled Cash Fund 550.00 TOTAL 550.00 550.00 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/29/2023 13:27User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488594 09/29/2023 PRTD 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 23EP1005 09/29/2023 20230928 250.00 CHECK 488594 TOTAL: 250.00 488595 09/29/2023 PRTD 160850 SCHMITZ, MATTHEW 23EP1001 09/29/2023 20230928 150.00 CHECK 488595 TOTAL: 150.00 488596 09/29/2023 PRTD 160851 MALCOMSON, KENT 23EP1008 09/29/2023 20230928 150.00 CHECK 488596 TOTAL: 150.00 NUMBER OF CHECKS 3 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 550.00 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 3 550.00 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 550.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 40 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 247,463.382100 Police Special Revenue 2,730.952200 Braemar Memorial 259.002300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 56,321.402500 Conservation & Sustainability 13,692.662600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 3,361.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 7,556.252600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 10,946.444000 Capital Projects 75,824.934200 Equipment Replacement 5,800.524400 PIR Capital Projects 1,746,803.695100 Art Center 2,656.755200 Braemar Golf Course 14,696.585300 Aquatic Center 576.915400 Edinborough Park 15,267.335500 Braemar Arena 31,481.995600 Braemar Field 1,080.005700 Centennial Lakes 3,442.205800 Liquor 138,419.525900 Utility Fund 400,985.985900 Utility Fund 94,153.195900 Utility Fund 728,569.326000 Risk Management 6,291.446100 Equipment Operations 27,058.446200 Information Technology 107.716300 Facilities Management 4,664.977100 PS Training Facility 197.207200 MN Task Force 1 33,722.949999 Pooled Cash Fund 3,674,133.19 TOTAL 3,674,133.19 3,674,133.19 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Mallory Schauer ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488597 10/06/2023 PRTD 160540 ACID REMAP LLC 1648 08/15/2023 20231006 2,500.00 CHECK 488597 TOTAL: 2,500.00 488598 10/06/2023 PRTD 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 20412 09/06/2023 20231006 129.47 CHECK 488598 TOTAL: 129.47 488599 10/06/2023 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 167R-HW3H-3FVJ 09/05/2023 20231006 1,094.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C13-HNMY-3YWC 09/05/2023 20231006 29.85 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1P1J-LKGF-34MT 09/05/2023 20231006 74.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HH6-PRHJ-47YX 09/05/2023 20231006 25.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V7V-YRTR-6LXC 09/06/2023 20231006 119.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FDL-J7Q7-6LJ6 09/06/2023 20231006 44.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HH6-PRHJ-6W7R 09/06/2023 20231006 39.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HTN-JRFM-6R3F 09/06/2023 20231006 20.37 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KY9-LHHW-7DLF 09/06/2023 20231006 72.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HTN-JRFM-7M77 09/06/2023 20231006 17.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17JG-4TQQ-94J1 09/06/2023 20231006 79.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RF7-WDNK-D6DC 09/06/2023 20231006 27.01 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RFY-RLJH-CWQG 09/06/2023 20231006 14.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 167R-HW3H-FG4G 09/06/2023 20231006 277.36 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XQG-16LR-DPLW 09/06/2023 20231006 -113.52 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 191J-XQ3J-G3FR 09/06/2023 20231006 -7.44 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1H9F-FG6J-FYHN 09/07/2023 20231006 232.57 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XKG-PDPW-J1V6 09/07/2023 20231006 23.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LY9-G1JQ-HMFV 09/07/2023 20231006 15.12 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HTN-JRFM-N1DL 09/08/2023 20231006 64.02 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LY9-G1JQ-PC63 09/08/2023 20231006 147.76 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 139H-GYG3-Q79M 09/08/2023 20231006 585.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11FG-6GK6-Q93H 09/08/2023 20231006 -58.42 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C13-HNMY-TYHP 09/09/2023 20231006 33.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GW6-1VTF-VF9J 09/09/2023 20231006 102.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1P1J-LKGF-YPXP 09/10/2023 20231006 2,075.46 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YF3-13VK-3T7W 09/10/2023 20231006 139.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 169C-RDL7-3CG1 09/10/2023 20231006 10.33 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 169C-RDL7-47PG 09/10/2023 20231006 15.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FXG-LTQ1-3N47 09/10/2023 20231006 17.32 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13VR-LCVF-4VLY 09/10/2023 20231006 224.42 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19Y9-TPWQ-4X7H 09/11/2023 20231006 46.70 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DMX-QM14-4KJW 09/11/2023 20231006 9.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DMX-QM14-QPFP 09/11/2023 20231006 80.06 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VQF-H77R-33JC 09/11/2023 20231006 13.98 CHECK 488599 TOTAL: 5,599.40 488600 10/06/2023 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500309764 09/04/2023 20231006 265.85 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500311253 09/06/2023 20231006 261.48 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500310316 09/05/2023 20231006 253.91 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500310330 09/05/2023 20231006 147.36 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500325252 09/27/2023 20231006 15.00 CHECK 488600 TOTAL: 943.60 488601 10/06/2023 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1199 09/21/2023 20231006 96.00 CHECK 488601 TOTAL: 96.00 488602 10/06/2023 PRTD 160339 ASSA ABLOY ENTRANCE SYSTEMS US IN CSI 88736 07/25/2023 20231006 8,650.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488602 TOTAL: 8,650.00 488603 10/06/2023 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 3599-222334 09/08/2023 20231006 280.49 CHECK 488603 TOTAL: 280.49 488604 10/06/2023 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.03 - 6 09/06/2023 20231006 3,833.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271913.01 - 7 09/06/2023 20231006 2,353.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.02-11 09/06/2023 20231006 2,176.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23270354.23-7 09/10/2023 20231006 8,718.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271996.00 - 5 09/10/2023 20231006 4,965.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271898.01-14 09/07/2023 20231006 13,010.80 CHECK 488604 TOTAL: 35,057.30 488605 10/06/2023 PRTD 160844 BEHR, BRADLEY 23CAPF-Behr 09/18/2023 20231006 500.00 CHECK 488605 TOTAL: 500.00 488606 10/06/2023 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200886200 09/21/2023 20231006 58.90 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107384400 09/21/2023 20231006 170.88 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107384200 09/21/2023 20231006 144.66 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200922600 09/21/2023 20231006 455.43 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107396900 09/21/2023 20231006 168.77 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107363100/10737780009/14/2023 20231006 95.04 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200903100 09/21/2023 20231006 97.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107391000 09/21/2023 20231006 250.74 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0200903300 09/21/2023 20231006 1,659.95 CHECK 488606 TOTAL: 3,102.02 488607 10/06/2023 PRTD 160836 BIFFS INC W935535 09/06/2023 20231006 401.72 BIFFS INC W935536 09/06/2023 20231006 183.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488607 TOTAL: 584.72 488608 10/06/2023 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24255 09/20/2023 20231006 369.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24254 09/20/2023 20231006 333.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24253 09/20/2023 20231006 383.00 CHECK 488608 TOTAL: 1,085.00 488609 10/06/2023 PRTD 101010 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 926952724 09/06/2023 20231006 189.48 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 926961723 09/07/2023 20231006 702.56 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 926970802 09/08/2023 20231006 58.48 CHECK 488609 TOTAL: 950.52 488610 10/06/2023 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 85079879 09/05/2023 20231006 902.54 CHECK 488610 TOTAL: 902.54 488611 10/06/2023 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 200076 09/19/2023 20231006 262.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 200075 09/20/2023 20231006 370.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 200077 09/19/2023 20231006 1,280.00 CHECK 488611 TOTAL: 1,912.00 488612 10/06/2023 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211159 09/20/2023 20231006 561.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112205061 09/20/2023 20231006 326.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211160 09/20/2023 20231006 2,714.44 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211187 09/20/2023 20231006 1,146.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112205063 09/20/2023 20231006 326.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211188 09/20/2023 20231006 861.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211185 09/20/2023 20231006 122.65 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211186 09/20/2023 20231006 490.96 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211180 09/20/2023 20231006 92.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211182 09/20/2023 20231006 50.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211183 09/20/2023 20231006 1,871.14 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211181 09/20/2023 20231006 402.59 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211178 09/20/2023 20231006 2,581.57 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112211179 09/20/2023 20231006 181.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112205062 09/20/2023 20231006 326.20 CHECK 488612 TOTAL: 12,054.85 488613 10/06/2023 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112186237 09/19/2023 20231006 295.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112186250 09/19/2023 20231006 415.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112186249 09/20/2023 20231006 532.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112186248 09/20/2023 20231006 423.00 CHECK 488613 TOTAL: 1,666.10 488614 10/06/2023 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 936899024 08/11/2023 20231006 174.15 CALLAWAY GOLF 936904860 08/14/2023 20231006 115.26 CALLAWAY GOLF 936925385 08/16/2002 20231006 455.40 CALLAWAY GOLF 936925384 08/16/2002 20231006 451.80 CALLAWAY GOLF 936925383 08/16/2002 20231006 981.45 CHECK 488614 TOTAL: 2,178.06 488615 10/06/2023 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2891501 09/22/2023 20231006 501.10 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2891500 09/22/2023 20231006 105.05 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2891519 09/22/2023 20231006 3,088.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2893476 09/27/2023 20231006 -7.13 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 19600494 09/27/2023 20231006 -30.75 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2892605 09/27/2023 20231006 1,173.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2893475 09/27/2023 20231006 207.00 CHECK 488615 TOTAL: 5,036.52 488616 10/06/2023 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 7258205 09/05/2023 20231006 1,807.50 CHECK 488616 TOTAL: 1,807.50 488617 10/06/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166747710 09/05/2023 20231006 11.52 CINTAS CORPORATION 4166747762 09/05/2023 20231006 89.76 CINTAS CORPORATION 4167108466 09/07/2023 20231006 14.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4167108419 09/07/2023 20231006 6.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4167108476 09/07/2023 20231006 35.04 CINTAS CORPORATION 4167328221 09/11/2023 20231006 179.83 CHECK 488617 TOTAL: 336.15 488618 10/06/2023 PRTD 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 22682 09/19/2023 20231006 13,589.50 CHECK 488618 TOTAL: 13,589.50 488619 10/06/2023 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN RFD-9/23-2 09/28/2023 20231006 1,394.75 CHECK 488619 TOTAL: 1,394.75 488620 10/06/2023 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN RFD-9/23-3 09/28/2023 20231006 7,881.04 CHECK 488620 TOTAL: 7,881.04 488621 10/06/2023 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN RFD-9/23-4 09/28/2023 20231006 13,740.42 CHECK 488621 TOTAL: 13,740.42 488622 10/06/2023 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN RFD-09/23-5 09/28/2023 20231006 899.67 CHECK 488622 TOTAL: 899.67 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488623 10/06/2023 PRTD 100087 CITY OF SAINT PAUL IN55450 09/18/2023 20231006 589.99 CHECK 488623 TOTAL: 589.99 488624 10/06/2023 PRTD 146213 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 09262023 09/26/2023 20231006 452.45 CHECK 488624 TOTAL: 452.45 488625 10/06/2023 PRTD 146213 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK SLPFD-09/23-2 09/27/2023 20231006 2,227.12 CHECK 488625 TOTAL: 2,227.12 488626 10/06/2023 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710030 09/20/2023 20231006 396.55 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710018 09/20/2023 20231006 1,317.50 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710034 09/20/2023 20231006 -16.24 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710019 09/20/2023 20231006 114.50 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710032 09/20/2023 20231006 156.75 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710031 09/20/2023 20231006 270.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 710029 09/20/2023 20231006 1,317.50 CHECK 488626 TOTAL: 3,556.56 488627 10/06/2023 PRTD 104928 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 34578 09/06/2023 20231006 114.49 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 35820 09/06/2023 20231006 114.49 CHECK 488627 TOTAL: 228.98 488628 10/06/2023 PRTD 160780 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1195 09/21/2023 20231006 155.00 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1199 09/21/2023 20231006 146.00 CHECK 488628 TOTAL: 301.00 488629 10/06/2023 PRTD 100706 DC ANNIS SEWER 133512 09/08/2023 20231006 925.00 DC ANNIS SEWER 133513 09/08/2023 20231006 945.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488629 TOTAL: 1,870.00 488630 10/06/2023 PRTD 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL INC CD99036254 09/05/2023 20231006 6,177.50 CHECK 488630 TOTAL: 6,177.50 488631 10/06/2023 PRTD 123995 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES LLC 9753041T460 10/01/2023 20231006 341.97 CHECK 488631 TOTAL: 341.97 488632 10/06/2023 PRTD 123995 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES LLC 9753057T460 10/01/2023 20231006 786.47 CHECK 488632 TOTAL: 786.47 488633 10/06/2023 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3908191 09/12/2023 20231006 3,361.50 CHECK 488633 TOTAL: 3,361.50 488634 10/06/2023 PRTD 129079 DRAIN KING INC 119524 09/05/2023 20231006 808.50 CHECK 488634 TOTAL: 808.50 488635 10/06/2023 PRTD 160061 FILTER BREWING COMPANY LLC PLATO 2188 09/15/2023 20231006 145.00 CHECK 488635 TOTAL: 145.00 488636 10/06/2023 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 963888 09/07/2023 20231006 107.10 CHECK 488636 TOTAL: 107.10 488637 10/06/2023 PRTD 143018 ECO WORKS SUPPLY 164 05/04/2023 20231006 1,735.90 CHECK 488637 TOTAL: 1,735.90 488638 10/06/2023 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-5291 09/15/2023 20231006 220.00 CHECK 488638 TOTAL: 220.00 488639 10/06/2023 PRTD 160519 ENVISIO SOLUTIONS INC 131544 10/12/2023 20231006 25,000.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488639 TOTAL: 25,000.00 488640 10/06/2023 PRTD 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC DD7419 09/05/2023 20231006 6,700.00 CHECK 488640 TOTAL: 6,700.00 488641 10/06/2023 PRTD 134730 EXPLORE EDINA AUG 2023 Lodging Tax09/14/2023 20231006 66,505.18 CHECK 488641 TOTAL: 66,505.18 488642 10/06/2023 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-501368 09/05/2023 20231006 89.28 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1/8971828 09/02/2023 20231006 104.98 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 75-476589 09/05/2023 20231006 7.04 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-501770 09/08/2023 20231006 122.22 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-501769 09/08/2023 20231006 16.01 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 112-219436 09/08/2023 20231006 7.93 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-501776 09/08/2023 20231006 22.44 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 231-002076 09/08/2023 20231006 13.02 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-501774 09/08/2023 20231006 3.52 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-8986591 09/08/2023 20231006 19.04 CHECK 488642 TOTAL: 405.48 488643 10/06/2023 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-11688 09/21/2023 20231006 312.00 CHECK 488643 TOTAL: 312.00 488644 10/06/2023 PRTD 116492 BRIDGETOWER OPCO, LLC 745632672 08/17/2023 20231006 218.94 CHECK 488644 TOTAL: 218.94 488645 10/06/2023 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1950208 09/05/2023 20231006 880.86 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1950292 09/05/2023 20231006 135.86 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1950448 09/05/2023 20231006 1,492.85 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1950515 09/05/2023 20231006 49.46 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 025743851 09/21/2023 20231006 -59.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1961346 09/21/2023 20231006 48.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 025802545 09/27/2023 20231006 -39.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 025802548 09/27/2023 20231006 -22.98 CHECK 488645 TOTAL: 2,486.05 488646 10/06/2023 PRTD 160475 GEISLINGER AND SONS INC 628 09/07/2023 20231006 28,900.76 CHECK 488646 TOTAL: 28,900.76 488647 10/06/2023 PRTD 144982 GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTE 209305/12 09/06/2023 20231006 2,172.01 GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTE 818818/6 09/08/2023 20231006 1,423.00 GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTE 701487/1 09/08/2023 20231006 318.90 CHECK 488647 TOTAL: 3,913.91 488648 10/06/2023 PRTD 140367 GEVEKO MARKETINGS INC 10305010837 09/07/2023 20231006 1,023.68 CHECK 488648 TOTAL: 1,023.68 488649 10/06/2023 PRTD 139752 CTI/USA INC 402403 09/06/2023 20231006 2,075.00 CHECK 488649 TOTAL: 2,075.00 488650 10/06/2023 PRTD 146181 GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION ENG 23-1 #3 08/11/2023 20231006 1,481,698.20 CHECK 488650 TOTAL: 1,481,698.20 488651 10/06/2023 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9827514309 09/05/2023 20231006 82.73 CHECK 488651 TOTAL: 82.73 488652 10/06/2023 PRTD 160347 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY LLC 23-0488 06/29/2023 22300032 20231006 5,671.05 CHECK 488652 TOTAL: 5,671.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488653 10/06/2023 PRTD 130116 HARRIS ST PAUL INC SR000028520. 06/02/2023 20231006 735.00 CHECK 488653 TOTAL: 735.00 488654 10/06/2023 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0365401 09/11/2023 20231006 18,000.00 CHECK 488654 TOTAL: 18,000.00 488655 10/06/2023 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-5130 09/12/2023 20231006 295.00 HEADFLYER BREWING E-5128 09/15/2023 20231006 362.00 CHECK 488655 TOTAL: 657.00 488656 10/06/2023 PRTD 160841 HEIDER, GEORGE & CAROLYN 23CAPF-Heider 09/11/2023 20231006 2,000.00 CHECK 488656 TOTAL: 2,000.00 488657 10/06/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000212748 09/19/2023 20231006 8.00 CHECK 488657 TOTAL: 8.00 488658 10/06/2023 PRTD 160860 HERREID & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING I 1284 06/02/2023 20231006 2,869.14 CHECK 488658 TOTAL: 2,869.14 488659 10/06/2023 PRTD 160008 RACHEL PETERSON 3288 09/08/2023 20231006 3,019.26 CHECK 488659 TOTAL: 3,019.26 488660 10/06/2023 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 242984 09/06/2023 20231006 2,766.48 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 242989 09/06/2023 20231006 2,320.26 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 241540 07/18/2023 20231006 6,100.40 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 240555 06/13/2023 20231006 2,337.80 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 242358 08/15/2023 20231006 3,701.70 CHECK 488660 TOTAL: 17,226.64 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488661 10/06/2023 PRTD 160637 HGS LLC IN40372 09/08/2023 20231006 523.75 CHECK 488661 TOTAL: 523.75 488662 10/06/2023 PRTD 160847 HIGH QUALITY MEDICAL EDUCATION Airway course 2023 09/07/2023 20231006 6,000.00 CHECK 488662 TOTAL: 6,000.00 488663 10/06/2023 PRTD 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 700556866 08/29/2023 20231006 1,986.37 CHECK 488663 TOTAL: 1,986.37 488664 10/06/2023 PRTD 100805 HIRSHFIELDS INC 03462347 09/06/2023 20231006 69.49 CHECK 488664 TOTAL: 69.49 488665 10/06/2023 PRTD 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA CO 20914 & 20927 09/11/2023 20231006 56,450.00 CHECK 488665 TOTAL: 56,450.00 488666 10/06/2023 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 647634 09/19/2023 20231006 2,119.95 HOHENSTEINS INC 647636 09/19/2023 20231006 81.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 647644 09/19/2023 20231006 788.25 HOHENSTEINS INC 647635 09/19/2023 20231006 1,599.30 HOHENSTEINS INC 647648 09/19/2023 20231006 1,608.00 CHECK 488666 TOTAL: 6,196.50 488667 10/06/2023 PRTD 100417 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO INV54092 09/07/2023 20231006 1,000.48 CHECK 488667 TOTAL: 1,000.48 488668 10/06/2023 PRTD 160239 HUEBSCH LAUNDRY CO 20256711 09/11/2023 20231006 214.49 CHECK 488668 TOTAL: 214.49 488669 10/06/2023 PRTD 160653 INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 7648 09/15/2023 20231006 559.55 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488669 TOTAL: 559.55 488670 10/06/2023 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Utilities-09/2023 09/25/2023 20231006 54.87 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC ELEC-09/2023 09/25/2023 20231006 25.44 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC POLICE-09/2023 09/25/2023 20231006 4.49 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC FIRE-09/2023 09/25/2023 20231006 68.62 CHECK 488670 TOTAL: 153.42 488671 10/06/2023 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3630022 09/21/2023 20231006 1,270.25 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3630020 09/21/2023 20231006 304.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3630021 09/21/2023 20231006 24.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3630023 09/21/2023 20231006 1,677.55 CHECK 488671 TOTAL: 3,277.00 488672 10/06/2023 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6658019 09/16/2023 20231006 27.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661638 09/21/2023 20231006 1,397.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661637 09/21/2023 20231006 224.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661640 09/21/2023 20231006 776.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661634 09/21/2023 20231006 468.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661636 09/21/2023 20231006 647.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661645 09/21/2023 20231006 136.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6661643 09/21/2023 20231006 761.40 CHECK 488672 TOTAL: 4,439.20 488673 10/06/2023 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7443674 09/21/2023 20231006 1,174.20 WINE MERCHANTS 7443673 09/21/2023 20231006 2,492.40 WINE MERCHANTS 751143 09/09/2023 20231006 -17.25 WINE MERCHANTS 751142 09/09/2023 20231006 -17.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE MERCHANTS 7443675 09/21/2023 20231006 397.20 CHECK 488673 TOTAL: 4,029.55 488674 10/06/2023 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387520 09/21/2023 20231006 4,720.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387527 09/21/2023 20231006 643.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387526 09/21/2023 20231006 1,642.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387521 09/21/2023 20231006 1,976.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387523 09/21/2023 20231006 4,701.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2383128 09/14/2023 20231006 350.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387525 09/21/2023 20231006 546.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387524 09/21/2023 20231006 563.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387522 09/21/2023 20231006 145.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387519 09/21/2023 20231006 31.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2383127 09/20/2023 20231006 351.41 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387516 09/21/2023 20231006 221.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387514 09/21/2023 20231006 276.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387511 09/21/2023 20231006 226.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387510 09/21/2023 20231006 905.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387518 09/21/2023 20231006 90.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387517 09/21/2023 20231006 697.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387512 09/21/2023 20231006 1,274.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 248381 07/01/2023 20231006 -58.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 248382 07/01/2023 20231006 -24.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387515 09/21/2023 20231006 98.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2383129 09/19/2023 20231006 351.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387531 09/21/2023 20231006 1,797.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 6661644 09/21/2023 20231006 4,143.96 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387534 09/21/2023 20231006 1,054.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387537 09/21/2023 20231006 2,013.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387530 09/21/2023 20231006 38.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387532 09/21/2023 20231006 226.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387536 09/21/2023 20231006 55.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387535 09/21/2023 20231006 3,501.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2387533 09/21/2023 20231006 480.87 CHECK 488674 TOTAL: 33,043.23 488675 10/06/2023 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 25906124 08/31/2023 20231006 3,517.18 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 160603028-0823 08/31/2023 20231006 7,556.25 CHECK 488675 TOTAL: 11,073.43 488676 10/06/2023 PRTD 160737 WEYAND COMPANIES LLC 000441 09/05/2023 20231006 103.00 CHECK 488676 TOTAL: 103.00 488677 10/06/2023 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 6622 09/20/2023 20231006 118.00 LA DONA SBC 6623 09/21/2023 20231006 118.00 CHECK 488677 TOTAL: 236.00 488678 10/06/2023 PRTD 160843 LARSON, THOMAS 23CAPF-Larson 09/12/2023 20231006 2,000.00 CHECK 488678 TOTAL: 2,000.00 488679 10/06/2023 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310907576 09/09/2023 20231006 860.92 CHECK 488679 TOTAL: 860.92 488680 10/06/2023 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 388803 09/01/2023 20231006 34,782.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 390525 09/21/2023 20231006 55.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488680 TOTAL: 34,837.00 488681 10/06/2023 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21127 08/01/2023 20231006 1,059.82 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21128 08/01/2023 20231006 1,640.23 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21125 08/01/2023 20231006 111.10 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21166 08/01/2023 20231006 2,545.19 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21229 08/01/2023 20231006 622.60 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21256 08/01/2023 20231006 312.50 CHECK 488681 TOTAL: 6,291.44 488682 10/06/2023 PRTD 103217 LHB INC 220556.00-12 09/11/2023 20231006 286.25 CHECK 488682 TOTAL: 286.25 488683 10/06/2023 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 62615 09/19/2023 20231006 454.08 LIBATION PROJECT 62616 09/19/2023 20231006 496.04 CHECK 488683 TOTAL: 950.12 488684 10/06/2023 PRTD 160832 LOOPUP LLC 4938800 07/31/2023 20231006 1,937.89 CHECK 488684 TOTAL: 1,937.89 488685 10/06/2023 PRTD 160548 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-1781 09/21/2023 20231006 195.00 CHECK 488685 TOTAL: 195.00 488686 10/06/2023 PRTD 135835 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 5142XLP6S3-2023251 09/08/2023 20231006 1,242.00 CHECK 488686 TOTAL: 1,242.00 488687 10/06/2023 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 55912 09/19/2023 20231006 198.00 CHECK 488687 TOTAL: 198.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488688 10/06/2023 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 24607874 09/08/2023 20231006 17,519.73 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 24607873 09/08/2023 20231006 3,118.56 CHECK 488688 TOTAL: 20,638.29 488689 10/06/2023 PRTD 116410 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40269176 09/05/2023 20231006 94.30 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40282411 09/07/2023 20231006 12,168.83 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40282412 09/06/2023 20231006 584.68 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40299408 09/07/2023 20231006 373.90 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40315760 09/08/2023 20231006 5,928.91 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40333372 09/11/2023 20231006 99.49 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40079935 08/18/2023 20231006 420.95 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 39907398 08/04/2023 20231006 23,047.77 CHECK 488689 TOTAL: 42,718.83 488690 10/06/2023 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1072904 09/21/2023 20231006 1,492.92 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1072883 09/21/2023 20231006 1,501.02 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1072875 09/21/2023 20231006 827.04 CHECK 488690 TOTAL: 3,820.98 488691 10/06/2023 PRTD 133458 MINNESOTA COUNTY/CITY MANAGERS AS 23 APMP DUES-STRAUB 09/28/2023 20231006 113.00 CHECK 488691 TOTAL: 113.00 488692 10/06/2023 PRTD 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 09-09-2023 09/09/2023 20231006 1,848.00 CHECK 488692 TOTAL: 1,848.00 488693 10/06/2023 PRTD 146040 STRAYER, JUSTIN IN-3810 09/20/2023 20231006 146.15 CHECK 488693 TOTAL: 146.15 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488694 10/06/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 70544 09/05/2023 20231006 172.95 MENARDS 70593 09/05/2023 20231006 83.26 CHECK 488694 TOTAL: 256.21 488695 10/06/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 88446 09/05/2023 20231006 83.72 MENARDS 88452 09/05/2023 20231006 38.88 MENARDS 88526 09/06/2023 20231006 203.96 MENARDS 88583 09/07/2023 20231006 139.98 MENARDS 88658 09/08/2023 20231006 19.96 MENARDS 88834 09/11/2023 20231006 71.73 CHECK 488695 TOTAL: 558.23 488696 10/06/2023 PRTD 100885 METRO SALES INC INV2359457 09/07/2023 20231006 368.28 CHECK 488696 TOTAL: 368.28 488697 10/06/2023 PRTD 100890 HILLTOP ENTERPRISES INC 2785 09/11/2023 20231006 800.00 CHECK 488697 TOTAL: 800.00 488698 10/06/2023 PRTD 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY INC 44770 09/06/2023 20231006 1,464.64 CHECK 488698 TOTAL: 1,464.64 488699 10/06/2023 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180242055 09/03/2023 20231006 6.48 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180242056 09/03/2023 20231006 49.69 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180242057 09/03/2023 20231006 18.36 CHECK 488699 TOTAL: 74.53 488700 10/06/2023 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT P05173 09/05/2023 20231006 16.03 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT P05267 09/08/2023 20231006 32.59 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488700 TOTAL: 48.62 488701 10/06/2023 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 34979 07/28/2023 20231006 4.18 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35102 08/19/2023 20231006 84.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35151 08/31/2023 20231006 52.21 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35163 09/02/2023 20231006 17.50 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35176 09/07/2023 20231006 34.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35190 09/11/2023 20231006 691.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35191 09/11/2023 20231006 54.33 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35195 09/11/2023 20231006 52.21 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35147 08/31/2023 20231006 34.60 CHECK 488701 TOTAL: 1,024.03 488702 10/06/2023 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-44677 09/19/2023 20231006 264.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-44675 09/19/2023 20231006 201.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-44676 09/19/2023 20231006 339.00 CHECK 488702 TOTAL: 804.00 488703 10/06/2023 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1397392-01 09/07/2023 20231006 448.48 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1402291-00 09/07/2023 20231006 126.47 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1404734-00 09/07/2023 20231006 60.26 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1404903-00 09/08/2023 20231006 405.66 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1404758-00 09/08/2023 20231006 184.09 CHECK 488703 TOTAL: 1,224.96 488704 10/06/2023 PRTD 100683 CHEMSEARCH 8379012 09/07/2023 20231006 815.06 CHECK 488704 TOTAL: 815.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488705 10/06/2023 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 211114 09/20/2023 20231006 341.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 211298 09/20/2023 20231006 610.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 211300 09/20/2023 20231006 293.00 CHECK 488705 TOTAL: 1,244.00 488706 10/06/2023 PRTD 160809 PETEBON, BENNIE 5040 09/05/2023 20231006 537.50 CHECK 488706 TOTAL: 537.50 488707 10/06/2023 PRTD 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 56338 09/05/2023 20231006 691.36 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 56355 09/07/2023 20231006 272.33 CHECK 488707 TOTAL: 963.69 488708 10/06/2023 PRTD 100926 BLUETARP FINANCIAL INC 1650989403 09/06/2023 20231006 27.99 CHECK 488708 TOTAL: 27.99 488709 10/06/2023 PRTD 999994 Felt, Meriwether Mornings-NNO 9/23 10/02/2023 20231006 138.85 CHECK 488709 TOTAL: 138.85 488710 10/06/2023 PRTD 999994 Nelson, Paul Brookview-NNO 9/23 10/02/2023 20231006 191.09 CHECK 488710 TOTAL: 191.09 488711 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 McChesney, Emily 57028888-Refund 07/10/2023 20231006 175.00 CHECK 488711 TOTAL: 175.00 488712 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Anderson, Mikaela 60911404-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488712 TOTAL: 16.25 488713 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Arnold, Julie 60911666-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488713 TOTAL: 32.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488714 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Beller, Leslie 60905078-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488714 TOTAL: 32.50 488715 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Burns, Melissa 60913154-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488715 TOTAL: 16.25 488716 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Carter, Paige 60912178-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488716 TOTAL: 32.50 488717 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Cavanaugh, Jorden 60911716-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488717 TOTAL: 16.25 488718 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Costello, John 60904343-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488718 TOTAL: 32.50 488719 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Cusic, Christina 60913061-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488719 TOTAL: 16.25 488720 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Day, Kimberly 60912253-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488720 TOTAL: 16.25 488721 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Dulin, Robert 60904415-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488721 TOTAL: 16.25 488722 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Dyste-Demet, Alex 60911776-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488722 TOTAL: 16.25 488723 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Feige, Meghan 60904813-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488723 TOTAL: 16.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488724 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Hawkins, Andrew 60912322-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488724 TOTAL: 32.50 488725 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Hertz, Lauren 60904639-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488725 TOTAL: 16.25 488726 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Hertzog, Melissa 60904905-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488726 TOTAL: 16.25 488727 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Kloos, Miranda 60911822-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488727 TOTAL: 32.50 488728 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Kunz, Katie 60911895-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488728 TOTAL: 32.50 488729 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Mantyh, Annie 60904681-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488729 TOTAL: 16.25 488730 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Melander, Lindsay 60912935-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488730 TOTAL: 16.25 488731 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Petersen, Lois 61123608-Refund 09/26/2023 20231006 10.00 CHECK 488731 TOTAL: 10.00 488732 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Rynda, Jamie 60904738-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488732 TOTAL: 16.25 488733 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Simons, Amanda 60913210-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 32.50 CHECK 488733 TOTAL: 32.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488734 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Skahen, Keely 60913272-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488734 TOTAL: 16.25 488735 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Smith, Christine 60912047-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488735 TOTAL: 16.25 488736 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Strutt, Jaclyn 60913014-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488736 TOTAL: 16.25 488737 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Tighe, Bridget 60904992-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488737 TOTAL: 16.25 488738 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Trepanier, Myriam 60911959-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488738 TOTAL: 16.25 488739 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Warner, Kate 60905604-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488739 TOTAL: 16.25 488740 10/06/2023 PRTD 999996 Welna, Jenna 60905668-Refund 09/19/2023 20231006 16.25 CHECK 488740 TOTAL: 16.25 488741 10/06/2023 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 250463632 09/05/2023 20231006 142.36 ORKIN 254215377 09/06/2023 20231006 149.47 ORKIN 250465068 09/08/2023 20231006 90.00 ORKIN 250463185 09/08/2023 20231006 55.71 ORKIN 248914099 08/16/2023 20231006 141.00 CHECK 488741 TOTAL: 578.54 488742 10/06/2023 PRTD 136189 P & W GOLF SUPPLY LLC INV118358 09/11/2023 20231006 623.08 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 488742 TOTAL: 623.08 488743 10/06/2023 PRTD 151973 PAINTING BY NAKASONE INC 7744 09/08/2023 20231006 1,542.00 CHECK 488743 TOTAL: 1,542.00 488744 10/06/2023 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 213748 09/19/2023 20231006 91.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 213744 09/19/2023 20231006 1,937.70 CHECK 488744 TOTAL: 2,028.70 488745 10/06/2023 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 18365158 09/25/2023 20231006 650.75 CHECK 488745 TOTAL: 650.75 488746 10/06/2023 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-204786 09/21/2023 20231006 330.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-204785 09/21/2023 20231006 83.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-203922 09/21/2023 20231006 141.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-204847 09/21/2023 20231006 106.20 CHECK 488746 TOTAL: 660.70 488747 10/06/2023 PRTD 100119 PING INC 17137604 09/05/2023 20231006 406.32 CHECK 488747 TOTAL: 406.32 488748 10/06/2023 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 8218210 09/11/2023 20231006 69.44 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 8224515 09/14/2023 20231006 107.44 CHECK 488748 TOTAL: 176.88 488749 10/06/2023 PRTD 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC 319606149 08/21/2023 20231006 -78.00 PREMIUM WATERS INC 319624164 08/31/2023 20231006 39.99 PREMIUM WATERS INC 319673715 09/28/2023 20231006 48.99 CHECK 488749 TOTAL: 10.98 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488750 10/06/2023 PRTD 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 79701 08/25/2023 20231006 774.00 CHECK 488750 TOTAL: 774.00 488751 10/06/2023 PRTD 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC 60313 09/06/2023 20231006 699.60 CHECK 488751 TOTAL: 699.60 488752 10/06/2023 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0079711-IN 09/11/2023 20231006 1,573.80 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0079721-IN 09/11/2023 20231006 850.00 CHECK 488752 TOTAL: 2,423.80 488753 10/06/2023 PRTD 140950 RCM EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC 9241 09/06/2023 20231006 1,349.92 CHECK 488753 TOTAL: 1,349.92 488754 10/06/2023 PRTD 100975 MULTI SERVICE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION 20230810033928 08/10/2023 20231006 600.00 CHECK 488754 TOTAL: 600.00 488755 10/06/2023 PRTD 125936 REINDERS INC 3098537-01 09/06/2023 20231006 158.79 REINDERS INC 3098636-00 09/06/2023 20231006 639.11 CHECK 488755 TOTAL: 797.90 488756 10/06/2023 PRTD 114799 RES GREAT LAKES LLC IN40370 09/08/2023 20231006 1,477.50 CHECK 488756 TOTAL: 1,477.50 488757 10/06/2023 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 88180 09/07/2023 20231006 1,041.75 CHECK 488757 TOTAL: 1,041.75 488758 10/06/2023 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 791964 09/06/2023 20231006 263.79 CHECK 488758 TOTAL: 263.79 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488759 10/06/2023 PRTD 160661 ROYAL SUPPLY INC 5313 09/05/2023 20231006 260.42 CHECK 488759 TOTAL: 260.42 488760 10/06/2023 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC ENG 22-2 #10 09/12/2023 20231006 1,359,208.46 CHECK 488760 TOTAL: 1,359,208.46 488761 10/06/2023 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2938554 09/14/2023 20231006 81.28 KELBRO COMPANY 2942583 09/21/2023 20231006 205.20 CHECK 488761 TOTAL: 286.48 488762 10/06/2023 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 452254 09/11/2023 20231006 54,707.46 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 452341 09/11/2023 20231006 3,587.01 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 452339 09/11/2023 20231006 10,946.44 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 452332 09/11/2023 20231006 1,012.83 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 452374 09/11/2023 20231006 1,816.38 CHECK 488762 TOTAL: 72,070.12 488763 10/06/2023 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0007558 09/06/2023 20231006 32.72 CHECK 488763 TOTAL: 32.72 488764 10/06/2023 PRTD 160793 SIGMA WELLNESS LLC 2471 09/13/2023 22300041 20231006 40,874.00 CHECK 488764 TOTAL: 40,874.00 488765 10/06/2023 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18613 09/01/2023 20231006 97.81 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18623 09/07/2023 20231006 185.00 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18641 09/12/2023 20231006 259.00 CHECK 488765 TOTAL: 541.81 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488766 10/06/2023 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134177316-001 09/05/2023 20231006 604.06 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134362419-001 09/11/2023 20231006 129.51 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134355587-001 09/11/2023 20231006 -199.73 CHECK 488766 TOTAL: 533.84 488767 10/06/2023 PRTD 160868 SKALISKY, SEAN MICHAEL 23CAPF-Skalisky 09/29/2023 20231006 1,980.30 CHECK 488767 TOTAL: 1,980.30 488768 10/06/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392101 09/20/2023 20231006 3,955.01 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392103 09/20/2023 20231006 224.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392099 09/20/2023 20231006 2,857.86 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392102 09/20/2023 20231006 581.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392100 09/20/2023 20231006 560.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392096 09/20/2023 20231006 2,150.36 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392097 09/20/2023 20231006 2,615.90 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392095 09/20/2023 20231006 141.56 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392098 09/20/2023 20231006 440.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392104 09/20/2023 20231006 3,502.38 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392108 09/20/2023 20231006 238.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392105 09/20/2023 20231006 407.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392107 09/20/2023 20231006 1,277.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2392106 09/20/2023 20231006 3,072.31 CHECK 488768 TOTAL: 22,025.58 488769 10/06/2023 PRTD 104408 SPEEDWAY LLC 057501092300 09/01/2023 20231006 5.00 CHECK 488769 TOTAL: 5.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488770 10/06/2023 PRTD 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 232368 09/05/2023 20231006 320.00 CHECK 488770 TOTAL: 320.00 488771 10/06/2023 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4842951.001 09/05/2023 20231006 143.04 CHECK 488771 TOTAL: 143.04 488772 10/06/2023 PRTD 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 16340.00-2 06/30/2023 22300016 20231006 3,045.77 CHECK 488772 TOTAL: 3,045.77 488773 10/06/2023 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 51856 09/20/2023 20231006 235.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 51873 09/20/2023 20231006 270.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 51874 09/18/2023 20231006 583.00 CHECK 488773 TOTAL: 1,088.00 488774 10/06/2023 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1653095 09/05/2023 20231006 3,666.63 STREICHERS INC I1653100 09/05/2023 20231006 4,219.20 CHECK 488774 TOTAL: 7,885.83 488775 10/06/2023 PRTD 124631 IRBY ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR S013464215.001 09/06/2023 20231006 72.43 CHECK 488775 TOTAL: 72.43 488776 10/06/2023 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 188479P 09/11/2023 20231006 224.88 CHECK 488776 TOTAL: 224.88 488777 10/06/2023 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10196160 09/06/2023 20231006 1,896.00 CHECK 488777 TOTAL: 1,896.00 488778 10/06/2023 PRTD 106374 THERMA-STOR LLC 3146359 RI 09/05/2023 20231006 199.38 CHECK 488778 TOTAL: 199.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488779 10/06/2023 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7719 09/05/2023 20231006 344.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7724 09/05/2023 20231006 716.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7728 09/05/2023 20231006 1,405.58 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7734 09/05/2023 20231006 628.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7736 09/05/2023 20231006 844.75 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7738 09/05/2023 20231006 344.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S7739 09/05/2023 20231006 472.55 CHECK 488779 TOTAL: 4,754.88 488780 10/06/2023 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2214802 09/06/2023 20231006 5,380.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2214774 09/06/2023 20231006 11,000.00 CHECK 488780 TOTAL: 16,380.00 488781 10/06/2023 PRTD 101049 UHL COMPANY INC 73189 09/07/2023 20231006 3,820.00 CHECK 488781 TOTAL: 3,820.00 488782 10/06/2023 PRTD 160648 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410010005 09/11/2023 20231006 388.81 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 141001006 09/11/2023 20231006 34.03 CHECK 488782 TOTAL: 422.84 488783 10/06/2023 PRTD 160036 VAULT HEALTH FL00596064 09/05/2023 20231006 486.10 CHECK 488783 TOTAL: 486.10 488784 10/06/2023 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 4972 09/20/2023 20231006 228.00 CHECK 488784 TOTAL: 228.00 488785 10/06/2023 PRTD 145907 VERNON BP Aug 2023 08/24/2023 20231006 315.00 CHECK 488785 TOTAL: 315.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488786 10/06/2023 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007283818.002 09/05/2023 20231006 22.77 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007283818.001 09/05/2023 20231006 197.85 CHECK 488786 TOTAL: 220.62 488787 10/06/2023 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0336751-IN 09/21/2023 20231006 941.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0336750-IN 09/20/2023 20231006 208.25 CHECK 488787 TOTAL: 1,149.75 488788 10/06/2023 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 69439303 09/08/2023 20231006 858.21 CHECK 488788 TOTAL: 858.21 488789 10/06/2023 PRTD 102886 WAGNERS GREENHOUSES INC 57215 09/11/2023 20231006 323.88 CHECK 488789 TOTAL: 323.88 488790 10/06/2023 PRTD 132751 WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA 23-03750 09/05/2023 20231006 1,080.00 WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA 23-03777 09/07/2023 20231006 593.75 CHECK 488790 TOTAL: 1,673.75 488791 10/06/2023 PRTD 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 218021 09/27/2023 20231006 1,488.95 CHECK 488791 TOTAL: 1,488.95 488792 10/06/2023 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 0105343-2808-2 08/02/2023 20231006 6,933.97 CHECK 488792 TOTAL: 6,933.97 488793 10/06/2023 PRTD 135181 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 186712 09/05/2023 20231006 3,209.69 CHECK 488793 TOTAL: 3,209.69 488794 10/06/2023 PRTD 130574 WATSON COMPANY 136858 09/07/2023 20231006 517.82 CHECK 488794 TOTAL: 517.82 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488795 10/06/2023 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 246754 09/20/2023 20231006 2,910.00 WINE COMPANY 246755 09/20/2023 20231006 274.00 WINE COMPANY 246756 09/20/2023 20231006 166.00 WINE COMPANY 246757 09/20/2023 20231006 2,198.00 WINE COMPANY 246753 09/20/2023 20231006 2,989.33 WINE COMPANY 246752 09/20/2023 20231006 114.00 CHECK 488795 TOTAL: 8,651.33 488796 10/06/2023 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00136508 09/19/2023 20231006 350.24 WINEBOW MN00136671 09/21/2023 20231006 1,236.00 WINEBOW MN00136463 09/19/2023 20231006 324.24 CHECK 488796 TOTAL: 1,910.48 488797 10/06/2023 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 249425 01 09/06/2023 20231006 258.99 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 249667 01 09/11/2023 20231006 31.54 CHECK 488797 TOTAL: 290.53 488798 10/06/2023 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4588 09/20/2023 20231006 197.10 CHECK 488798 TOTAL: 197.10 488799 10/06/2023 PRTD 160863 SARA L. HANSON 09072023 09/07/2023 20231006 2,275.00 CHECK 488799 TOTAL: 2,275.00 488800 10/06/2023 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-022715-000-2 06/30/2023 22300017 20231006 7,060.50 CHECK 488800 TOTAL: 7,060.50 488801 10/06/2023 PRTD 103266 YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC October 2023 09/20/2023 20231006 1,148.77 CHECK 488801 TOTAL: 1,148.77 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/05/2023 13:14User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 488802 10/06/2023 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN001148103 09/05/2023 20231006 812.06 CHECK 488802 TOTAL: 812.06 488803 10/06/2023 PRTD 160252 HANCE UTILITY SERVICE, INC. 34525 09/05/2023 20231006 6,157.00 CHECK 488803 TOTAL: 6,157.00 NUMBER OF CHECKS 207 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 3,674,133.19 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 207 3,674,133.19 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 3,674,133.19 Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Scott Denfeld, Video Production Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Council Chambers Cable Broadcast Audio Visual System Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of upgraded audio and visual equipment in the City Hall Council Chambers by Advanced Systems Integration for $121,019. INTRODUCTION: Many key components of the Council Chambers Cable Broadcast Audio Visual System have reached the end of their useful life and need to be replaced. This is evident by the fact that we’ve had a number of significant equipment failures in the past year or so. The Communications Department obtained three proposals from vendors that covered the same scope of work. It is staff’s recommendation to move forward with the equipment updates using Advanced Systems Integration as the vendor. The combination of scope of work and understanding of our system needs combined with the lowest bid submitted makes Advanced Systems Integration a good fit for this project. Their submitted bid including equipment and labor is $121,019.99. The project is a planned capital project and will be funded using PEG cable franchise fees. If approved, the project is anticipated to be complete before the end of the year. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300181 Department:Communications Buyer:Scott Denfeld Date: 10/10/2023 Requisition Description:Council Chambers Broadcast System Equipment Updates Vendor:ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LLC Cost:$121,019.99 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION:Replace and upgrade components of Council Chambers broadcast system BUDGET IMPACT: Will be paid for using PEG fees Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:The broadcast system benefits all residents of Edina ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:No impact or increase in energy/waste/natural resources Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: City-Wide Solar Feasibility Study Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for HGA Inc. to conduct a city-wide solar feasibility study for $54,500. INTRODUCTION: HGA Inc. will conduct a solar feasibility study on the majority of city sites. This study will provide preliminary design information for viable solar installation locations. Once sites are identified, staff will review and move forward with projects that are viable for design and possible construction. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: City-Wide Solar Feasibility Study HGA Contract 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 Requisition Number 12300178 Department: Engineering Buyer: Derik Otten Date: 08.2.2023 Request for Purchase Requisition Description: ENG23114 CITY WIDE SOLAR FEASIBILITY STUDY Vendor: HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC (HGA INC.) Cost: $54,500 REPLACEMENT or NEW: NEW PURCHASE SOURCE: QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: This project will study a large portion of city owned facilities to determine viability of solar collection on both roofs structures and surrounding site area. Work is being conducted in tandem with City Wide Roof Condition assessment. BUDGET IMPACT: The assessment is funded from Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) funds. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: Strong Foundation: Capital Assets meet the need of the City now and in the future. Capital assets are managed to sustain service levels and prevent unnecessary and costly emergency repairs by taking a proactive approach to evaluation current conditions and make repairs thus extending the useful life of building structures and components. Roofs that meet criteria for replacement based on condition will be prioritized for solar installations. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The study of the roofs and possible solar collection will help offset energy requirements of those buildings thus reducing the cities effective carbon footprint. PROPOSAL PREPARED FOR CITY OF EDINA Solar PV and EV Charging Feasibility Study SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 22, 2023 City of Edina | 3 September 22, 2023 Derik Otten, Facility Manager City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd., Edina, MN 55439 952-826-0356 | DOtten@EdinaMN.gov Re: City of Edina Solar PV and EV Charging Feasibility Study Dear Derik, We are pleased to submit our proposal to serve as the solar and engineering consultants for the City of Edina Solar PV and EV Charging Feasibility Study. This proposed feasibility study will evaluate the potential to implement solar photovoltaics and expand EV charging infrastructure across numerous city facilities. The initial study will include 22 city sites that accounted for over 9 million kWh of electrical usage in 2022 per the B3 data provided. The proposed feasibility study will evaluate the opportunities available for solar PV and EV charging including analyzing structural and electrical requirements, benefits, risks, and cost estimates for budget planning. An analysis of the historical utility usage will be performed to optimize the solar PV planned for the site. After utility information has been analyzed the solar PV will be optimized based on production and payback. The feasibility study will begin upon notice to proceed, and all work will be completed within 90 days of the contract. We have appreciated the opportunity to collaborate with the City of Edina in the past and look forward to working with you on this important project. On behalf of our team, thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal. Sincerely, Wade Cooper, PE, LEED AP Associate Principal wcooper@hga.com 612-758-4384 612.758.4000 HGA.COM 420 North 5th Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 4 | HGA City of Edina | 5 SITE ANALYSIS HGA will evaluate solar potential for the 22 locations provided by the city, considering the results from previous studies and available as-built documents. We will also include the viability of carport solar and EV charging feasibility on site given the current infrastructure. HGA will use the current building energy use data from B3 to organize the project sites by greatest annual kWh production needed. We will review options for layouts and provide initial information for solar output prior to any site visits. This initial assessment will be used to inform electrical and structural engineers as to the potential loading conditions for the proposed PV array. We will prioritize the highest energy consuming buildings for the site investigation. HGA’s multi- disciplinary team will work collaboratively on site to determine key limitations and consider alternative installations to keep the solar installation economically feasible. Specific objectives for the site investigation will include: 1. Visual review of existing conditions as compared to building documentation. 2. Use data provided by roofing contractor to assess the feasibility of roof-mounted applications imposed by the PV units, ballast and additional snow drift that the units may cause. Full structural review of roofing systems not completed under this initial phase. 3. Confirm information provided by roofing contractor as to the general condition of the roofing materials. 4. Evaluate the existing electrical system for capacity, code compliance, safety/reliability. 5. Evaluate space availability for electrical equipment associated with the PV array 6. Confirm viability of carport solar on the sites noted for consideration. 7. Provide a summary of electrical system capacity needed to support new or additional EV chargers. REPORT HGA will develop a conceptual design for a proposed PV array at each building, including a detailed narrative of existing conditions that need to be resolved as part of the solar installation. HGA’s cost estimating department will provide an estimate for repairs or remediation required to accommodate the proposed solar systems. HGA will recommend a conceptual design that seeks to maximize solar generation potential and minimize the cost of alterations. HGA will recommend additional investigation and provide a proposal for additional services if requested by the County. HGA will prepare a final project report detailing the findings. We will present a consolidated summary, prioritized based on solar generation potential as well as carport solar, EV charger feasibility and estimated system costs. APPROACH AND TIMELINE HGA appreciates the City of Edina’s initiative to install on-site solar at city facilities. Retrofitting existing facilities with roof-mounted solar applications may reduce utility costs, increase our region’s capacity for clean energy generation and reduce the carbon footprint from city operations. We have designed photovoltaic systems for new construction and existing buildings retrofits, ranging in size from 15kW to 650 kW. We also have experience designing and installing on-site solar for our own Madison office, which was installed in 2015 and has generated 106,000 kWh. We understand the importance of an inter-disciplinary review for existing conditions as part of understanding the feasibility and conceptual construction costs associated with roofing, structural and electrical scope in order to have the proper infrastructure for solar PV. Existing conditions regarding roofing, structure and electrical service may affect how viable the building is for solar PV. HGA’s objective for this project is to create a prioritized list of the sites for the City of Edina based on the locations provided to achieve maximum on-site solar generation at the lowest capital cost. We realize that extensive investigations only add to the project costs, but strategically planning a solar installation to coincide with a roof replacement will ultimately reduce life-cycle costs. Further, electrical and structural systems must be able to safely accommodate the planned capacity, meeting current code requirements INFORMATION GATHERING Upon Notice-to-Proceed, HGA will be begin by confirming the project scope. We will review existing facility drawings as well as any related documentation. We will schedule a kick-off meeting to review the following: y Confirm project goals y Proposed workplan y Schedule site visits to locations as needed Figure 1 – Example of a shading heatmap that can be produced for each building (from Shading Report for Edina City Hall) Figure 2 – Estimated monthly production for Edina City Hall JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 0 10k 20k 30k kWhMONTHLY PRODUCTION 6 | HGA City of Edina | 7 BUILDINGS INCLUDED IN STUDY BUILDING ADDRESS # BLDGS ON SITESIZE (SF)2022 B3 SITE EUI2022 ANNUAL ELECTRIC CONSUMPTIONEXISTING EV CHARGING/ RATINGEV CHARGER PLAN CARPORT PV DESIRED (Y/N)Aquatic Center 4300 West 66th St 1 8,193 461 239,760 No EV chargers None Y Arneson Acres Greenhouse 4711 W 70th St 1 3,280 64 14,512 No EV chargers None N Arneson Acres Museum 4709 W 70th St 1 7,539 55 22,281 No EV chargers None N Art Center 4701 W 64th St 1 8,073 105 34,007 No EV chargers None N Braemar Arena and Sports Field 7501 Ikola Way 2 270,755 113 3,133,361 No EV chargers Maybe 1-2 dual port, Level 2 Y Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse and Maintenance 6364 John Harris Dr 2 27,059 125 435,898 No EV chargers Maybe 1-2 dual port, Level 2 Y Braemar Golf Dome 7420 Braemar Blvd 1 50,883 118 178,836 No EV chargers None N Centennial Lakes Pavilion 7471 France Ave S 2 22,243 58 109,907 No EV chargers None N City Hall 4801 W 50th St 1 74,781 130 1,117,536 4 dual port, Type 2 + PD 2 dual port, Type 2 Wired for up to 40 ports in parking lot. May add more to PD. Y Edinborough Park 7700 York Ave. S 1 58,427 187 1,136,139 No EV chargers None Y Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave 6250 Tracy Ave.1 33,996 110 300,952 1 dual port, Type 2 No additional N Fire Station No. 2 York Ave 7335 York Ave. S 1 4,999 114 63,606 No EV chargers None N Fred Richards Golf Course 7640 Parklawn Ave 2 9,033 33 14,902 No EV chargers None N Liquor Store 50th St 3943 W 50th St 1 10,972 55 92,596 No EV chargers None N Liquor Store Vernon Ave 5013 Vernon Ave S 1 8,661 80 119,794 1 dual port, Type 2 No additional N Liquor Store York Ave 6755 York Ave S 1 8,741 99 123,079 1 dual port, Type 2 No additional N North Parking Ramp 3940 Market St 1 181,849 8 447,111 1 dual port, Type 2 No additional Y Public Works 7450 Metro Blvd 1 148,949 40 1,061,060 1 dual port, Type 2 parking lot. 5 dual port, Type 2 PW garage. Potentially a DC Fast Charger, or two in long-term Y Senior Center 5280 Grandview Sq 1 17,841 93 142,493 No EV chargers None N South Metro Public Safety Training Facility 7525 Braemar Blvd 1 25,077 113 247,597 No EV chargers Maybe 1 dual port, Level 2 N Arden Park 5230 Minnehaha Blvd 1 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Pamela Park 4301 W. 58th St 1 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD PROJECT SCHEDULE SEPT 23 OCT 23 NOV 23 DEC 23 Project Kick Off Existing Document Collection Roof Assessment (by others) Energy Use and PV Analysis Electrical Systems Assessment EV Charging Assessment Preliminary Report Review Final Report 8 | HGA City of Edina | 9 WADE COOPER PE PRINCIPAL Wade Cooper has 14 years experience overseeing complex energy-efficient project life cycles and processes. He is a hands-on problem solver who excels in working with owners and architects in a collaborative team environment. Wade’s results- oriented focus, and keen ability to drive development in the midst of technical uncertainties, are reflected in a proven ability to handle multiple projects while meeting tight deadlines. Wade is recognized for developing effective energy solutions with an extraordinary blend of creativity, leadership, building design and energy evaluation knowledge. SELECTED EXPERIENCE City of Edina City Hall ECM Solar PV Project | Edina, Minnesota City of Edina Community Health and Safety Center | Edina, Minnesota City of Edina Public Works Building-Recommissioning | Edina, Minnesota EDUCATION | AFFILIATIONS Masters Degree in Business Administration St. Cloud State University Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering University of North Dakota Registered Professional Engineer Minnesota LEED AP ASHRAE Member MIKE BARNETT PE, CCP PROJECT MANAGER As part of HGA’s energy and infrastructure group, Mike is an engineer with substantial experience overseeing a wide variety of commissioning, retro-commissioning energy master plan projects as well as solar PV design and feasibility studies. Mike is part of HGA’s Madison office (formerly SEG) which was acquired in 2018. Mike’s leadership in energy facility assessments has been strengthened by complimentary engineering expertise from in-house structural and electrical engineers. SELECTED EXPERIENCE Ramsey County, MN Solar Feasibility Engineering Analysis | Ramsey County, Minnesota Forest Edge Elementary School Net Zero Design, Solar PV and Battery Storage Design | Oregon, Wisconsin Dane County East Highway Garage | Solar PV Feasibility Study and Solar Commissioning | Madison, Wisconsin Dane County Medical Examiner | Solar PV Feasibility Study and Solar Commissioning | Madison, Wisconsin IBM Rochester Solar PV Feasibility Study | Rochester, Minnesota EDUCATION | AFFILIATIONS Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison Registered Mechanical Engineer Wisconsin Certified Commissioning Professional Building Commissioning Association American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers Member ZACHARY POYNTER, LEED AP SENIOR ELECTRICAL DESIGNER Zachary Poynter maintains an up-to-date knowledge base in all aspects of electrical medium and high voltage power distribution systems, lighting controls, revenue and power quality metering solutions, building automation systems, system integration, alternative energy technologies, Energy Codes, and standards. He has worked with clients to implement and assess how Solar Photovoltaic would be interconnected to buildings and campus distribution power systems. He has designed and implemented submetering systems and demand side management strategies to allow clients to track control of their energy consumption. SELECTED EXPERIENCE Ramsey County, MN Solar Feasibility Engineering Analysis | Ramsey County, Minnesota Wolf Ridge Environmental Learning Center Living and Learning Facilities | Finland, Minnesota City of St. Louis Park Westwood Hills Nature Center | St. Louis Park, Minnesota Arizona State University Student Pavilion | Net Zero Energy and LEED Platinum | Tempe, Arizona General Services Administration Derby Line Land Port of Entry | Derby Line, Vermont Boston Scientific Corporation Renovation/Remodel | San Jose, California EDUCATION | AFFILIATIONS Bachelor of Applied Management Dunwoody College of Technology AAS of Electrical Construction Design & Management Dunwoody College of Technology LEED AP PROJECT TEAM JOE TARLIZZO, LEED AP BD+C COST ESTIMATOR Joe has 20 years of experience in construction planning, estimating, and sustainability. Joe is particularly adept in conceptual analysis of the value of proposed building components, in terms of cost, resource use, and sustainability. He has made valuable contributions to the project teams on projects from whole campus energy master planning to elemental systems life cycle cost analysis. His vast experience in achieving LEED, WELL, and other sustainable certifications demonstrates his passion and expertise in bringing results to clients. SELECTED EXPERIENCE Wolf Ridge Environmental Learning Center West Dorm and Staff Housing | Pursuing Zero Net Energy and Living Building Certification | Finland, Minnesota Westwood Hills Nature Center LCCA Analysis | Pursuing Zero Net Energy | St. Louis Park, Minnesota Confidential Federal Office Building LEED, SITES, and Federal Guiding Principles Certification | Derby, Vermont Derby Line Land Port Entry LEED Certification, Federal Building Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Resiliency Analysis | Derby, Vermont EDUCATION | AFFILIATIONS Bachelor of Science, Construction Engineering North Dakota State University Certified Professional Constructor AIC Construction Certification Commission US Green Building Council Minnesota Chapter Board Member Living Building Challenge Member 10 | HGA City of Edina | 11 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE REDUCING THEIR CARBON FOOTPRINT, COUNTY-WIDE RAMSEY COUNTY | SOLAR FEASIBILITY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS | MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Ramsey County wanted to install rooftop solar photovoltaic systems on existing County buildings to generate clean energy on-site and reduce County-wide greenhouse gas emissions. The feasibility study, performed by HGA, provided the documentation, strategies and tools the County needed to work toward their carbon reduction goals. The County identified a list of 20 buildings from Parks and Recreation and Property Management for the study, which evaluated roof conditions, site potential, structural capacity and existing electrical systems to identify “shovel-ready” sites for rooftop solar. In addition to assessing the existing conditions, the team estimated the cost for installing rooftop solar at those sites, and performed solar analysis using modeling software to determine kWh production and estimate the annual solar generation. Six buildings were identified as shovel-ready with roof areas that will allow for a cumulative 647 kW (dc) of photovoltaic capacity, or 600 kW (ac). Average electric production from these 6 photovoltaic arrays would generate 835,700 kWh annually, and would help the County avoid 716,195 lbs CO2e annually, or 325 metric tons CO2e. In addition, the County can benefit from reduced utility costs, enhanced resiliency, and an increase in the region’s capacity for clean energy generation. CONNECTING TO NATURE THROUGH NET ZERO CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK | ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA Westwood Hills Nature Center (WHNC) is a 160-acre nature park featuring prairie, forest and marsh areas, with immersive trails and an educational center. WHNC sought to replace their small, aging facility with a new building aimed at connecting people to nature. The new WHNC provides the City of St. Louis Park with an all season, state-of-the-art, nature-focused destination that inspires and challenges all ages, backgrounds and abilities to enjoy everything this natural area has to offer. With a light and sustainable touch, HGA’s design solutions allow the magic and natural beauty of the WHNC to shine through, with the confidence that the project will remain Net Zero for decades to come, even in the face of a changing climate. Part of a City effort towards a sustainable future, the WHNC serves as an example for sustainability strategies, including Net Zero Energy use. HGA’s design provides a high-performance building envelope, form and layout to take advantage of solar and wind angles on site. Energy use is offset by rooftop solar photovoltaic panels. These and other sustainable features are expressed in the design to serve as a teaching tool for visitors. 12 | HGA City of Edina | 13 LOCATION ENERGY USE ENERGY USE NEEDED (25% BY 2025) RENEWABLES IDENTIFIED COST INCENTIVE ELECTRIC (KWH) GAS (THERMS) ELECTRIC (KWH) GAS (THERMS) ELECTRIC (KWH) GAS (THERMS) CITY OF EAU CLAIRE 10,252,475 275,044 2,563,119 69,511 151,552 21,674 $3,170,335 $458,595 COUNTY OF EAU CLAIRE 4,654,992 237,248 1,167,748 59,312 238,783 29,21 $2,465,700 $375,773 CITY OF ALTOONA 721,828 33,139 180,457 8,285 40,664 134 $836,600 $97,280 TOTAL 15,629,295 548,431 3,911,324 137,108 430,999 24,729 $6,472,635 $931,647 FIRST NET ZERO ENERGY SCHOOL IN WISCONSIN FOREST EDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | FITCHBURG, WISCONSIN HGA has worked with Oregon School District for the past ten years, providing a variety of energy consulting, commissioning, retro-commissioning and engineering design services– continuing their long history of continued leadership in environmental stewardship. Forest Edge Elementary School is the first Net Zero Energy (NZE) school in the State of Wisconsin, offsetting 100% of all on-site energy needs. Realizing not only cost savings potential, but the ability to create a living laboratory and model of sustainability, the school utilizes many state-of-the-art technologies, including a microgrid with 125kW/250kWh battery storage, a 646-kilowatt solar photovoltaic (PV) system, and a geothermal heating and cooling system. There is no natural gas line serving the 126,580 SF building and 100 percent of the building’s energy needs are provided from electricity. The microgrid system works in tandem with the battery and the 1,704 solar panel system array, storing excess solar energy produced. This energy can then be strategically deployed back into the school to meet other energy demands or it can be fed back into the main power grid system, making Forest Edge’s impact reach beyond its own walls. The innovative energy systems are also used as educational tools for the school and the larger community. The school includes a viewing area to see the roof mounted system and includes a real-time energy dashboard that can be viewed through an internet connection by anyone interested in learning about the school’s sustainability features and ongoing energy performance compared to the net zero energy target. Bray Architects, the architect for the project, teamed with HGA and J.H. Findorff & Son Inc., to support the District throughout the planning, design, and construction process. A PATH TO SUSTAINABILITY CITY OF EAU CLAIRE, CITY OF ALTOONA AND COUNTY OF EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN | PATH TO 25 X 25 HGA was hired by the City of Eau Claire, City of Altoona and County of Eau Claire to help develop a strategy to utilize at least 25% of their building and vehicle energy consumption from renewable sources by 2025. HGA reviewed over 20 municipal buildings and the vehicle fleet utilized by the City of Eau Claire, City of Altoona and Eau Claire County to identify strategies to reduce energy consumption and increase renewable energy sources. Each building underwent a detailed audit to identify energy efficiency and renewable energy opportunities, including site assessments for solar PV, solar hot water and on-site wind. Extensive assessment of the vehicle emissions was performed and analyses of alternative options were presented that included biofuel and hybrid vehicles to show how they could help reach their goal. Our recommendations identified a path towards the 25% by 2025 objective. The table above includes a summary of findings. Energy efficient upgrades, renewable energy and alternative fueling strategies included the following technologies: y Solar electric y Solar hot water y Geothermal heating and cooling y Heat recovery y Wind turbines y Biomass energy production y Biogas fueling y Hybrid conversions 14 | HGA City of Edina | 15 HALLMARK OF SUSTAINABILITY ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | STUDENT PAVILION | TEMPE, ARIZONA The ASU Student Pavilion is a place design for student life to thrive. The 75,000 SF building is a place where students organize, housing student government offices, classrooms, and a 1,200-seat event space—campus spaces that encourage students to take the lead. HGA engaged students from the start of the project, where they set the goal to make the Student Pavilion their first net zero building on campus, and teamed up with local architect Weddle Gilmore Black Rock Studio to bring design concepts to reality during the conceptual and schematic design phases. To achieve net zero, the design team prioritized energy efficiency to reduce energy demand. After schematic design HGA’s Engineering team continued to provide MEP engineering services through construction administration and building optimization during first year of occupancy. Beyond HVAC and lighting control strategies, the team optimized the building envelope and devices to control building plug load. On-site solar photovoltaics (PV) were essential to power the net-zero energy building. HGA delivered a comprehensive AC and DC system design for a building mounted PV system using panels that were donated to ASU. Phased construction required multiple mounting techniques, including ballasted roof mount, a fixed canopy mount above the rooftop mechanical equipment, and integrated share canopies on the southern façade. HGA designed the PV array to optimize power production, strengthen the architectural vision, and plan safe, reliable AC interconnections for power distribution. In its first 6-months of operation, the 250 kW on-site solar PV system for the Student Pavilion generated 250,000 kWh avoiding $22,000 in energy costs and delivering approximately 91% of electricity consumed by the building. Commissioning is ongoing, and the building is expected to achieve net zero status. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ON LAKE SUPERIOR WOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER | FINLAND, MINNESOTA Wolf Ridge Environmental Learning Center is a captivating place in northern Minnesota that draws upon the elegance of nature’s design as a powerful teacher—particularly in teaching young children and teenagers. The center’s mission is to create memories that change people and their behavior—particularly as they interact with wildlife and the environment. Until recently, however, the Wolf Ridge campus was not a model of sustainability. That changed when the center hired HGA to design a remodel of its existing dorm and add staff housing and a maintenance shed that would meet the highest standards in sustainability, energy use, and water conservation. HGA created a plan that focused on five zeros in energy, carbon, water, waste and materials. Resource use in each room can be monitored, encouraging students to modify their behaviors in sustainable ways. What’s more, the buildings are designed to sit lightly on the land, having little impact on existing vegetation yet taking advantage of views to nearby Lake Superior. The environment itself, as well as the new living- learning facilities, create an ideal setting for learning, thinking, and transformation. 16 | HGA City of Edina | 17 COST INFORMATION We welcome discussion regarding fees and scope. We endeavor to make this study and its results useful to your goals and needs. PERSON Wade Cooper Mike Barnett Zach Poynter Joe Tarlizzo ROLE Principal Project Manager Electrical Engineer Cost Estimating TASK HOURS HOURS HOURS HOURS Project Kick Off& Other mtgs 4 4 6 0 Existing Document Collection 16 2 4 0 Roof Assessment (by others)0 2 0 0 Energy Use and PV Analysis 0 20 0 2 Electrical Systems Assessment 0 2 70 2 EV Charging Assessment 0 2 6 2 Preliminary Report Review 2 10 30 0 Final Report 20 30 40 0 ESTIMATED HOURS 42 72 156 6 COMPENSATION The above table represents an early estimate on labor breakdown by task, position, and person on our team. It is assumed for the purposes of meeting the study requirements that HGA will be able to adjust the time for each person and time for each task as the project progresses, as long as the total T&M limit is not exceeded. The scope of services (the “Basic Services”) to be provided by HGA under this Agreement is described in the above Proposal. Compensation to HGA for Feasibility Study services will be on a time and materials (T&M) basis. In addition to compensation for the Services, HGA will be reimbursed for its Reimbursable Expenses at 1.05 times their cost to HGA, estimated not to exceed $500. Solar PV and EV Charger Feasibility Study – Not-To-Exceed $54,000 COMPENSATION ESTIMATED REIMBURSABLES $500.00 HGA FEE $54,000.00 TOTAL $54,500.00 ASSUMPTIONS 1. Hours include evaluating maximum kW array rating roof could accommodate, and evaluating array size based on what the existing electrical service size can support. Maximum two scenarios. 2. Assumes site survey of only the main electrical room and any exterior site utility transformer or related equipment and roof. If the building is large and has several electrical rooms that PV could be tied into additional services will be necessary. 3. Analysis includes roof mounted solar PV and carport solar only. Options for PV on the site or canopies is not included. 4. Access to roof areas are by stairs or ladders provided by City of Edina. 5. Review of roofing condition is determined by estimating age of roof and visual review only. No destructive testing is included. EXCLUSIONS 1. Electric Utility company interconnection agreements and Utility coordination. ACCEPTANCE HGA and the City of Edina have an established Master Service’s Agreement. The client’s acceptance of this offer will be secured through the term’s and conditions of that agreement. If this Proposal is acceptable to you, please advise us. We will be happy to provide further information as necessary to prepare contractual documents. Thank you for the opportunity to be of continued service to the City of Edina. ________________________________________ __________________ Wade Cooper, Principal, HGA Date ________________________________________ __________________ Scott Neal, City Manager, City of Edina Date 420 North 5th St, Ste 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 T 612.758.4000 F 612.758.4199 Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Todd Milburn, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Approve Agreement with Southdale Center for Public Safety Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve agreement with Southdale Center for supplemental public safety services. INTRODUCTION: Southdale Center will pay $120,000 per year and provide space for a Police substation within the mall. T he Police Department will assign two Retail Crime Investigators to perform their duties at Southdale Center. For many years, two Retail Crime Investigators operated out of Southdale Center. Southdale provided space in their basement and at one time compensation to offset some of the costs of the assigned officers. The financial agreement ended many years ago and evolving staffing priorities and operating conditions eventually led the department to relocate staff to the Police Department. As activity continues to increase in the area and Southdale prioritizes redevelopment of their property the time is right to renew the partnership. The new police substation will be built out at Southdale's expense in the mall directly across from the Hennepin County Service Center providing a high visibility presence in the mall. ATTACHMENTS: Description Southdale Center Agreement 1 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________ 2023, by and between the CITY OF EDINA (hereinafter referred to as the “City of Edina” or “City”) and SOUTHDALE CENTER, LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Southdale”), collectively referred to as the “Parties.” WHEREAS, Southdale is the owner and operator of the Southdale Center shopping center located in the City of Edina (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Southdale and City have had multiple discussions regarding security at the Property and the effect of the Property’s operations on the City’s police resources; and WHEREAS, Southdale Center has completed certain developments and expansions of the Property, and continues to evaluate potential developments and expansions of the Property, and these activities have resulted in increased usage of City public safety services by the Property; and WHEREAS, the City believes that having additional police officers assigned to dedicated presence at the Property will deter crime and increase citizen and community safety at and around the Property; and WHEREAS, the City will provide supplemental public safety services at the Property only if Southdale provides funding to subsidize the employment costs of such additional police officers; and WHEREAS, Southdale and the City desire to enter into this Agreement to memorialize the supplemental public safety services at the Property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises hereinafter set forth, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The City shall provide to Southdale supplemental public safety services at the Property, including but not limited to police services staffed at the Property. The supplemental public safety services at the Property shall be directed by the Chief of Police and/or their designee in coordination with Property management. The supplemental public safety services are more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A. 2. In consideration of the supplemental public safety services provided by the City, Southdale shall, subject to paragraph 3 below, pay the City a supplemental public safety services special charge (hereinafter referred to as the “special charge”) in the following amounts: 2 a. $120,000 for the period beginning January 1, 2024 and expiring on December 31, 2024; and b. $123,600 (accounting for a 3% increase) for the period beginning January 1, 2025 and expiring on December 31, 2025; and c. $127,308 (accounting for a 3% increase) for the period beginning January 1, 2026 and expiring on December 31, 2026. Said special charges shall be billed to Southdale quarterly via an invoice from the City of Edina. The following invoicing schedule shall apply as of January 1, 2024: 1st Quarter: February 1 2nd Quarter: May 1 3rd Quarter: August 1 4th Quarter: November 1 Said invoices shall be in the form attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B. Southdale shall make payment not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the aforesaid quarterly invoices from the City. 3. The term of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years commencing on January 1, 2024 and shall continue in full force and effect until expiration on December 31, 2026. Either Party may terminate the Agreement without cause by providing ninety (90) days’ advance written notice. 4. The City shall assign police officers to be stationed at the Property that will perform their job duties as described in Exhibit A. The officer presence shall be designed to deter and prevent crime at the Property and protect citizens and staff. 5. Southdale will provide approximately 380 square feet of space (the “Space”) to the City to be used for public safety purposes at the Property, including but not limited to use as a police substation. Southdale agrees to build out the Space at Southdale’s expense to allow for office use with standard walls, doors, flooring, ceilings, lighting, glass, HVAC and keycard access. City and Southdale will work together to configure the Space for City’s needs, including considerations for Officer safety, but Southdale shall determine the materials, means and methods for building out the Space in its discretion. The Space will be leased to the City for nominal annual rent under the terms set forth on Exhibit C. 6. The City has the sole right to control the manner and means of performing the services covered by this Agreement. The City’s police officers, supervisors, employees and agents furnished pursuant to this Agreement shall at all times be employees of the City and the City shall exercise complete and exclusive control over all personnel and all aspects of the services provided to Southdale, including but not limited to, evaluation of the City’s personnel screening, hiring, training, deployment, supervision, discipline, discharge and adherence to all relevant laws, statutes and regulations, resolution of 3 complaints and grievances and to all other matters necessary to perform the services herein. 7. Southdale and the City acknowledge that, at all times relevant to this Agreement, all police officers assigned to the Property are employees of the City of Edina Police Department and shall not be considered employees of Southdale. As employees of the City of Edina Police Department, any claims for injuries or illness resulting to police officers assigned to patrol at the Property in accordance with this Agreement shall be governed by applicable workers’ compensation laws and any benefits available to the police officers pursuant to any collective bargaining agreement with the City of Edina. 8. To the extent allowed by applicable law, the City shall defend and indemnify Southdale, Simon Property Group, L.P., Simon Property Group, Inc. and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, members, partners, agents and assigns, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, penalties, actions, suits, damages, expenses, attorney fees and costs of any kind and nature whatsoever (“Claims”) for property damage, bodily injury and/or death brought by third parties but only to the extent said claims arise directly out of the negligent acts or omissions of police officers operating pursuant to this Agreement. 9. This Agreement is required to provide the resources necessary for supplemental public safety services to the persons present at the Center. 10. This Agreement and Exhibits constitute the sole and entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and all other prior agreements with respect to public safety services are hereby superseded by this Agreement and are of no further force or effect. Any modifications to this Agreement must be made in writing and signed by all Parties prior to taking effect. 11. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the Parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns. 12. The validity, construction, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall in all ways be governed and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 13. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the parties hereto, and delivered by electronic or facsimile transmission, and each shall be considered an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK] 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed, to be effective as of the date first above written, SOUTHDALE CENTER, LLC, a Delaware CITY OF EDINA limited liability company By: By: Its: Its: 5 Exhibit A This document shall serve as “Exhibit A” to the Memorandum of Agreement (“Agreement”) between the City of Edina (“City”) and Southdale Center, LLC (“Southdale”) setting forth the required staffing of police services at Southdale Center in Edina, Minnesota (the “Center”) and is specifically incorporated into the Agreement. 1. The City of Edina Police Department (“EPD”), acting by and through its Police Chief, shall assign and designate two (2) EPD Retail Crime Investigators (“Officers”) for the term of this agreement, to be exclusively assigned to perform their assigned duties at the Center, operating out of the police substation Space at the Center. The EPD Officers shall be assigned to the Center at EPD’s discretion. 2. The Officers shall be assigned to the Center for specially designated shifts to maximize coverage near higher activity time periods. Actual schedules will be mutually agreed upon by the Police Chief, or their designee, and Southdale. 3. If at any time EPD is unable to staff two Officers for more than seven (7) consecutive days, Southdale may send a notice to City requesting that Officer staffing be returned to normal levels. Any cost associated with replacing an Officer via overtime will be the obligation of EPD. If City and EPD are unable to return Officer staffing to normal levels within thirty (30) days of the notice, Southdale’s payment obligations shall be prorated and reduced until such time as Officer staffing is returned to normal levels. 4. The Officers assigned to the Center will normally wear the standard EPD uniform. Officers may wear an alternate uniform or plain clothes when necessary to fulfill their assigned duties. 5. Officers assigned to the Center will meet regularly with the Security Director and/or Property Manager of the Center to discuss pertinent public safety issues. 6. With the exception of an emergency determined by the Police Chief or their designee, the police officers assigned to the Center will have no other regularly assigned duty, post or position. 7. When additional police resources, are needed on the property of Southdale Center, the assigned Officers or other EPD staff will notify the Property Manager whenever possible. 8. Assigned Officers will utilize City police vehicles. There will be no charge to Southdale for these vehicles. Southdale will provide two reserved parking spaces near the police substation Space for EPD’s exclusive use. 6 Exhibit B City of Edina Edina, MN Invoice No._ _ _ - - - SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES SPECIAL CHARGE - - - Qty Description Unit Price TOTAL Quarterly Supplemental Public Safety Services Special Charge Please make the check payable and mail to: City of Edina Edina, MN Subtotal TOTAL Please return a copy with payment Taxpayer Name Address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ City State Zip _ PO# 7 EXHIBIT C – TERMS OF LEASE 1. Demise of Space. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, Southdale, LLC (“Landlord”) leases to City of Edina (“Tenant”) Space 1345A consisting of 380 square feet (the “Space”) at Southdale Center in Edina, Minnesota (“Center”). A drawing depicting the location of the Space in the Center is attached hereto. 2. Permitted Use. The Space may be occupied and used by Tenant for the purpose of operating a police substation and retail crime investigation office. Tenant shall not use the Space for any other purpose without Landlord’s consent. 3. Term. This Lease shall expire at the expiration or termination of the Memorandum of Understanding between Landlord and the Tenant dated ________. 4. Rent. Tenant agrees to pay $10 per year for the use of the Space. 5. Utilities. Landlord shall provide all utilities for the Space at Landlord’s cost and expense. 6. Insurance. Tenant shall furnish to Landlord certificates of insurance or other evidence of coverage satisfactory to the Landlord, providing evidence that the following coverage is in full force and effect, naming Landlord, Landlord's Property Manager, and Simon Property Group, Inc. as additional insureds. The required coverages are as follows: (a) a commercial general liability policy with a limit of not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence with a $2,000,000.00 general aggregate limit of liability; (b) Worker's Compensation in compliance with any and all statutes requiring such coverage in the state where the Center is located; and (c) Employer's Liability in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 each employee and $1,000,000 policy aggregate. 7. Indemnification. (a) Tenant shall indemnify, defend and hold Landlord (and Landlord’s parent companies, subsidiaries, members, partners, directors, officers, related and affiliated entities, lenders, managers, employees, and agents) (collectively, ‘Landlord Parties’) harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, penalties, actions, suits, damages, expenses, disbursements (including legal fees and expenses) or costs of any kind and nature whatsoever (“Claims”) in any way relating to or arising out of Tenant’s use of the Space or any occurrence which takes place in or about the Space. The indemnification obligations waivers contained in this paragraph shall survive expiration or early termination of this Lease. 8. Supervision and Control. Tenant shall at all times provide sufficient supervision and maintain adequate control of its employees, representatives, guests and invitees while the same are in or about the Space, so as to prevent unlawful or offensive actions and actions which are a breach of this Lease. 8 9. Return of Space. Upon expiration, Tenant shall return the Space to Landlord, remove all of Tenant’s personal property and peaceably yield up the Space, broom clean and in good repair and condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted. 10. No Assignment. Tenant shall not assign, mortgage, pledge or in any manner transfer this Lease or any interest therein or sublet all or any part of the Space. 11. Entire Agreement. This Lease and the Memorandum of Understanding are an integrated agreement which contain the entire agreement between the parties as to the matters addressed herein and incorporates all prior discussions and agreements. There are no agreements between the parties which are not contained herein, and Tenant has not received or relied on any representations from Landlord or Landlord's agents. No subsequent change, modification or addition to this Lease shall be of any force or effect whatsoever unless in writing and signed by the party to be charged. Agreed this _______ day of ______________, 2023 LANDLORD: TENANT: SOUTHDALE CENTER, LLC, a Delaware CITY OF EDINA limited liability company By: By: Its: Its: B 21.42'17.83'21.42'11.83'0.83'3.17'1345A 380 1405A 1,401 Leasing Agent: Unit No. Level: Date: Scale: DBA Name: TSD# Corp. No. The information in this document is confidential and a proprietary trade secret of the Landlord and may not be copied, distributed, published or disclosed without prior written permission.Landlord retains the right to design, change, alter or modify (without prior written notice) the size and configuration of any or all of the Center or any of the buildings, premises, hallways, malls, corridors, kiosks, tenant spaces or common areas contained therein, including, but not limited to, the identity, size, configuration, location or arrangement of any of the foregoing.This document does not constitute any contract or obligation by the Landlord.Landlord makes no representations or warranties regarding the Center, any premises contained therein, or the accuracy of the information contained in this document.It is the responsibility of Tenant or Tenant's contractor to field verify existing site conditions and dimensions. Simon Property Group 225 W. Washington St. Indianapolis,In 46204 Copyright © 2023, Simon Property Group, L.P. All Rights Reserved 1345A 1" = 20' 05/30/23 19:51 01 1345A 5259 SOUTHDALE CENTER Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director - Recreation and Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Braemar Field Emergency Repairs Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for emergency repairs at Braemar Field with New Look Contracting for $37,566. INTRODUCTION: During a weather event in July, Braemar Field experienced a critical failure in the field understructure and substructure creating a sinkhole that made use of the field unsafe. An investigation into the cause of the sinkhole was done by staff and consultants. An emergency repair was approved by City Manager Neal at the time the repairs were completed. This repair was critical in order to restore recreation services and use for Edina athletic associations and other community use. The attached RFP is for services completed for this project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Braemar Field Emergency Repairs Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300177 Department:P&R Braemar Field Buyer:Tracy Petersen Date: 10/05/2023 Requisition Description:Braemar Field Critical Field and Subsurface Repairs Vendor:NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC Cost:$37,566.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Emergency services to repair sinkhole BUDGET IMPACT: Repair and Maintenance Budget for Braemar Field Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Closures to West Field impact associations and rental use ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Repairs will restore stormwater treatments capacity Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks and Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Mill Pond Harvester Access Ramp Replacement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for the Mill P ond harvester access ramp replacement with Blackstone Contractors for $47,793. INTRODUCTION: The City coordinates harvesting of aquatic plants each year on the Mill P ond at the request of property owners. The cost for the service is shared among property owners adjacent to Mill Pond with a contribution from the City. The cost is special assessed to each property annually. The Mill Pond harvester access ramp at Browndale Park is in poor condition and in need of replacement. The existing ramp has deteriorated to the point where it no longer will work to provide access for the harvester. Additionally, there are erosion issues associated with the existing ramp. The City would cover 50% of construction costs with the other 50% being special assessed to properties in the assessment district per the tiered residential equivalent unit (REU) rates. The access must be repaired for coordination of harvesting to continue. The Edina Mill Pond Association Board has approved the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Mill Pond Harvester Access Ramp Replacement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300154 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tom Swenson Date: 09/11/2023 Requisition Description:Mill Pond Harvester Access Ramp Replacement Vendor:BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC Cost:$47,793.65 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION:Mill Pond Harvester Access Ramp Replacement. BUDGET IMPACT: Split between Mill pond lake association assessment and City budget. Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Allows continued requested aquatic plant removal. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Will reduce erosion of soils. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Richard Poppitz, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2023 Kubota RTC-X1100 ATV Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for one 2023 Kubota RTC-X1100 ATV from Lano Equipment for $31,240. INTRODUCTION: Lano Equipment will provide the Kubota ATV. This will be used for the winter recreational components of the Braemar Park master plan including cross country skiing and snowshoeing. T he capital purchase is funded by the Local Option Sales Tax to implement the amenity. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2023 Kubota RTC-X1100 ATV Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300174 Department:Public Works Buyer:Richard Poppitz Date: 10/04/2023 Requisition Description:2023 Kubota RTC-X1100 ATV Vendor:LANO EQUIPMENT INC Cost:$31,240.32 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:2023 Kabota ATV for Braemar golf course BUDGET IMPACT: Local Option Sales Tax Funded Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:All resident accessibility ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Tier 4 Diesel option Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2023 Kubota ATF 1100 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): N/A Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:N/A Carbon Emissions:N/A Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Dave Goergen, Assistant Public Works Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Well Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 17 Rehabilitation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase for the rehabilitation of well numbers 4, 5, 6 and 17 from Keys Well Drilling for $88,399.75. INTRODUCTION: These wells are being rehabilitated because they have reached one billion gallons pumped. This is the standard end of life rate for a well. The cost stated below is for each individual well. The exact cost per well is unknown until the well is removed from the well casing, inspected and replacement quantities determined. Staff recommends authorization of $65,000 per well or $260,000. Per Well Unit Cost: Well 4- $23,266.00 Well 5- $19,501.25 Well 6- $24,816.25 Well 17- $20,816.25 ATTACHMENTS: Description RFP Well 4 Rehab RFP Well 5 Rehab RFP Well 6 Rehab RFP Well 17 Rehab Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300170 Department:Public Works Buyer:Dave Goergen Date: 10/03/2023 Requisition Description:Well Rehab- Well 4 Vendor:KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY INC Cost:$23,266.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Rehab of Well 4 Bids: Keys- $23,266 E.H. Renner- $27,957 Bergerson- Chose not to provide a quote BUDGET IMPACT: Utility Fund- Water CIP Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300171 Department:Public Works Buyer:Dave Goergen Date: 10/03/2023 Requisition Description:Well Rehab- Well 5 Vendor:KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY INC Cost:$19,501.25 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Rehab of Well 5 Bids: Keys- $19,501.25 E.H. Renner- $27,607 Bergerson- Chose not to provide quote BUDGET IMPACT: Utility Fund- Water CIP Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300172 Department:Public Works Buyer:Dave Goergen Date: 10/03/2023 Requisition Description:Well Rehab- Well 6 Vendor:KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY INC Cost:$24,816.25 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Rehab of Well 6 Bids: Keys- $24,816.25 E.H. Renner- $27,957 Bergerson- Chose not to provide quote BUDGET IMPACT: Utility Fund- Water CIP Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300173 Department:Public Works Buyer:Dave Goergen Date: 10/03/2023 Requisition Description:Well Rehab- Well 17 Vendor:KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY INC Cost:$20,816.25 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Rehab of Well 17 Bids: Keys- $20,816.25 E.H. Renner- $23,857 Bergerson- Chose not to provide quote BUDGET IMPACT: Utility Fund- Water CIP Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Extra Mile Day 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the proclamation declaring November 1, 2023, Extra Mile Day. INTRODUCTION: Each year, the Extra Mile America Foundation asked cities to highlight this day to remind individuals and organizations that one person can make a difference in creating positive changes in America. Edina began participating in Extra Mile Day in 2015. ATTACHMENTS: Description Extra Mile Day 2023 Proclamation PROCLAMATION EXTRA MILE DAY NOVEMBER 1, 2023 WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, is a community which acknowledges that a special vibrancy exists within the entire community when its individual citizens collectively “go the extra mile” in personal effort, volunteerism, and service; and WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, is a community which encourages its citizens to maximize their personal contribution to the community by giving of themselves wholeheartedly and with total effort, commitment and conviction to their individual ambitions, family, friends and community; and WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, is a community which chooses to shine a light on and celebrate individuals and organizations within its community who “go the extra mile” in order to make a difference and lift up fellow members of their community; and WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, acknowledges the mission of Extra Mile America to create 550 Extra Mile cities in America and is proud to support “Extra Mile Day” on November 1, 2023. NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim November 1, 2023, to be EXTRA MILE DAY I urge each individual in the community to take time on this day to not only “go the extra mile” in his or her own life, but to also acknowledge all those who are inspirational in their efforts and commitment to make their organizations, families, community, country or world a better place. Dated this 17th day of October, 2023. ________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: November 2023 as Lung Cancer Awareness Month in Edina Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the proclamation declaring November 2023 as Lung Cancer Awareness Month in Edina. INTRODUCTION: According to the American Lung Cancer Screening Initiative (ALCSI), lung cancer is the deadliest cancer in the United States and the world, but it has been shown that lung cancer screening significantly reduces mortality as it can help to diagnose lung cancer earlier. However, only 5.8% of high-risk individuals are currently getting screened, which means thousands of lives are lost every year simply due to a lack of awareness. To raise awareness about lung cancer and lung cancer screenings and help educate the public, ALCSI has asked the City to declare November 2023 Lung Cancer Awareness Month in Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Lung Cancer Awareness Month 2023 Proclamation PROCLAMATION LUNG CANCER AWARENESS MONTH NOVEMBER 2023 WHEREAS, Whereas, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States, accounting for more deaths than colon cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer combined; and WHEREAS, Whereas the five-year survival rate for localized lung cancer is 60%, yet only 24% of lung cancers are diagnosed at this stage; and WHEREAS, Whereas, funding for lung cancer research trials are far behind funding for research of many other cancers, and additional research is needed in early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for lung cancer as well as in lung cancer health disparities; and WHEREAS, Whereas lung cancer incidence is decreasing twice as fast in men as it is in women, each year more women die from lung cancer than breast cancer and by 2035, more women will die from lung cancer than men; and WHEREAS, Whereas the stigma surrounding lung cancer creates barriers to early diagnosis, treatment, and funding for research, has a detrimental impact on the quality of life of people diagnosed with lung cancer, and hinders awareness of and research into lung cancer risk factors other than smoking; and WHEREAS, Whereas, organizations working in Edina, such as the American Lung Cancer Screening Initiative and Women’s Lung Cancer Forum, are committed to educating about lung cancer and lung cancer screening and working to increase lung cancer screening rates. NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim November 2023, to be LUNG CANCER AWARENESS MONTH IN EDINA and recognize the need for research in lung cancer affecting women and lung cancer health disparities, and encourage all citizens to learn about lung cancer and early detection through lung cancer screening. Dated this 17th day of October, 2023. ________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Dan Doar, Graphic Designer Item Activity: Subject:2023 "Images of Edina" Presentation Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: The City established “Images of Edina” in 2004 to recognize and collect photographs that capture Edina as a place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Each year, residents and employees who work in Edina are invited to submit their favorite photos taken in the community over the past year. A judging panel of photographers and communications professionals chose the winning photographs in five categories: Business, People, Community Events, Places in Edina, and Plants and Animals. The photos were judged on a variety of elements, including composition, lighting, relevance to each category and degree of difficulty. Once submissions were finished, the photos were published on Edina Magazine’s website for readers to vote for the Readers’ Choice Award Winner. The winners of the 2023 Images of Edina Contest are: Business – “Pinstripes at Sunset” by Stephanie Thomas People – “Friends” by Forrest P earson Activities & Events – “John Phillip Sousa at Centennial Lakes” by Linda Scott Places in Edina – “Reflections at Centennial Lakes” by Linda Scott Plants & Animals – “Forest Fawn” by Valerie Brunnette Readers’ Choice – “A New Day in Edina” by Burton Hanson Of the category winners, one photo was chosen as the overall “Best in Show” winner, which will be announced at the meeting. Mayor Jim Hovland will present awards to the winners at the meeting. Awards will be mailed to the winners attending virtually. Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-77: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-77 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-77: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2023-77 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation Caribou Coffee Beverages for attendees Dogs Days event Braemar Golf Association $1,950 Braemar Memorial Fund Edina Senior Center Home Instead & Monarch Health Shred Truck Shred event for residents Friends of the Edina Library Movie screening for 80 “The Unimaginable Journey of Peter participants Ertel” & Director Q&A Allina Health Aetna Painting with fabric program for 18 participants Donna Tilsner $55 For general use Dated: October 17, 2023 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2023. City Clerk Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-65: Conditional Use Permit, Puttshack Rooftop Dining, 10 Southdale Center Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-65 approving Conditional Use Permit for Puttshack Rooftop Dining at 10 Southdale Center. INTRODUCTION: Brendan Barker, on behalf of Puttshack, is proposing rooftop dining at Puttshack, located at 10 Southdale Center. Puttshack is an upscale, tech-infused mini golf experience. It will be located within the former Herberger’s building, above the Kowalski’s grocery store. Currently both the Kowalski’s and Puttshack spaces are under construction. Puttshack is proposing to have foodservice on their outdoor rooftop patio. Food and drinks will be served from inside the space. The proposed rooftop patio has 153 seats. To accommodate the applicant’s request, the following is required: Conditional Use Permit for the rooftop dining. Rooftop restaurants are a conditional use in the Planned Commercial District. Public input on Better Together Edina ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-65 Staff Report, Sept. 27, 2023 Applicant Submittal Site Photos Lighting and Noise Ordinances Memo from Health Department-Noise Proximity to Residential Map Additional Information from Applicant Better Together Public Input Report RESOLUTION NO. 2023-65 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PUTTSHACK AT 10 SOUTHDALE CENTER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Puttshack is proposing rooftop dining with 153 seats at Southdale Center at 10 Southdale Center, a portion of the former Herberger’s site. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: TRACT A, EXCEPT THAT PART EMBRACED WITHIN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 028, RANGE 24. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. A Conditional Use Permit. 1.04 On September 27, 2023, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. 1.05 On October 3, 2023 the City Council held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed rooftop dining is not in close proximity to existing residential uses. 2. The proposal meets the conditional use permit criteria in Section 36-612 of the City Code. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Conditional Use Permit for Puttshack at 10 Southdale Center. Approval is subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-65 Page 2 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city’s noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city code. 3. The rooftop dining area will be kept in a clean and orderly manner. 4. Service of alcoholic beverages requires the applicant to obtain appropriate liquor licenses in compliance with Edina Code Section 4 and Minnesota Statute 340A. 5. Required fencing shall meet the Minnesota State Building Code and must be reviewed and approved by the Building Department. 6. Lighting shall meet the requirements in Section 36-1260 of City Code. 7. The rooftop dining area shall be constructed per the plans date stamped 8/28/23 and 9/7/23. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 17, 2023. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2023-65 Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk September 27, 2023 Planning Commission Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-65 Conditional Use Permit for Puttshack at 10 Southdale Center Information / Background: Brendan Barker, on behalf of Puttshack, is proposing rooftop dining at Puttshack, located at 10 Southdale Center. Puttshack is an upscale, tech-infused mini golf experience. It will be located within the former Herberger’s building, above the Kowalski’s grocery store. Currently both the Kowalski’s and Puttshack spaces are under construction. Puttshack is proposing to have foodservice on their outdoor rooftop patio. Food and drinks will be served from inside the space. The proposed rooftop patio has 153 seats. To accommodate the applicant’s request, the following is required: Conditional Use Permit for the rooftop dining. Rooftop restaurants are a conditional use in the Planned Commercial District. A conditional use is a use that the city permits in a zoning district when certain conditions are met. Rooftop restaurants are a conditionally permitted use in Edina’s PCD-3 zoning district. The conditions outlined in Edina’s code for rooftop restaurants are as follows: 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. The city council may further restrict the hours of operation based upon the proximity of the area to residential dwelling units and upon considerations relating to the safety and welfare of residents, businesses, and other uses near the establishment. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city's noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city Code. STAFF REPORT Page 2 3. The rooftop dining area shall be kept in a clean and orderly manner. No food or beverages may be stored on the rooftop unless a suitable means for such storage has been reviewed and approved by the city as part of the CUP. 4. Rooftop restaurants must be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses at the time the rooftop restaurant is established. 5. A liquor license is required to serve alcohol in the rooftop dining area. 6. Fencing or a guard is required around the perimeter of the rooftop dining area per the Minnesota State Building Code. 7. Lighting shall be permitted to the extent that it only illuminates the designated area. Lighting shall not shine or cause a glare upon other public or private property outside the designated area, and subject to section 36-1260. There are existing rooftop dining facilities in close proximity to Puttshack that have gone through the conditional use permit process. Lifetime Athletic received a CUP in 2018 for rooftop dining on their rooftop pool deck. RH (Restoration Hardware) received a CUP for rooftop dining in 2019. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Southdale Center; zoned PCD-3 and guided Community Activity Center. Easterly: Southdale Center property (parking) and Southdale Transit Center and Park & Ride; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Southerly: Southdale Center property (parking), The Galleria and One Southdale Place Apartments; zoned PCD-3 and guided Community Activity Center. Westerly: Southdale Center; zoned PCD-3 and guided Community Activity Center. Existing Site Features The subject property, 10 Southdale Center, is 45.77 acres in size and is located within the Southdale Center site. Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District STAFF REPORT Page 3 Site Circulation, Traffic & Parking There would be no change in access or traffic to the site. The proposed rooftop restaurant would be utilized by Puttshack patrons. The Puttshack space is a remodeled area of existing tenant space within Southdale Center. Outdoor seating does not require additional parking spaces in the City’s parking code. Building/Building Material Elevation changes associated with Kowalski’s and Puttshack were reviewed and approved administratively with the tenant finish permits. No additional changes would be made to the exterior of the building with the addition of the rooftop dining. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 36-612 of the Edina City Code, a conditional use permit for rooftop restaurants shall meet the following: 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. The city council may further restrict the hours of operation based upon the proximity of the area to residential dwelling units and upon considerations relating to the safety and welfare of residents, businesses, and other uses near the establishment. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city's noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city Code. 3. The rooftop dining area shall be kept in a clean and orderly manner. No food or beverages may be stored on the rooftop unless a suitable means for such storage has been reviewed and approved by the city as part of the CUP. 4. Rooftop restaurants must be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses at the time the rooftop restaurant is established. 5. A liquor license is required to serve alcohol in the rooftop dining area. 6. Fencing or a guard is required around the perimeter of the rooftop dining area per the Minnesota State Building Code. 7. Lighting shall be permitted to the extent that it only illuminates the designated area. Lighting shall not shine or cause a glare upon other public or private property outside the designated area, and subject to section 36-1260. Staff believes that the above criteria are met. The applicant initially intended to have the rooftop hours reflect the same hours of operation of the interior space (11:00 AM to 12:00 AM Monday through Wednesday and 11:00 to 1:00 AM Thursday-Friday) but since the initial application was submitted staff has informed the applicant that the hours of operation for the outdoor dining space is limited to 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM to comply with the conditional use permit criteria Section 36-612 of the City Code. STAFF REPORT Page 4 The proposed rooftop area is located on the back half of the building, behind the existing building front, closest to the interior of the mall. The patio is enclosed by the existing building and no additional fencing or screening is proposed. There isn’t residential property in close proximity to the proposed rooftop restaurant. One Southdale Place is located over 500 feet away from the Puttshack rooftop, the Westin is over 1,000 feet, and the Onyx is over 800 feet from the Puttshack rooftop. The closest single-family residence is located in Richfield, roughly 1,200 feet from the rooftop; the closest single-family residence in Edina is located approximately 2,000 feet from the proposed rooftop. The applicant has submitted a lighting plan with the application. The rooftop lighting is required to meet the city’s lighting requirements. The applicant is also required to adhere to the city’s noise ordinance. Both the lighting and noise ordinances are included in the planning commission packet for reference. A memo from the city’s health department is also attached that explains the city’s noise ordinance. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Are the plans proposed reasonable to minimize impacts for the conditionally permitted Use? Yes, the proposed application for rooftop dining meets the requirements per section 36-612 of the Zoning Code. The rooftop dining area is within the footprint of the existing building and is situated so that it sits behind the existing building front and is screened from residential property. The hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm-as noted in the recommended conditions for approval. There is no residential property in close proximity to the proposed rooftop restaurant. Per the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit, it can be determined that the project will meet the requirements for a rooftop restaurant. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for rooftop dining at Puttshack at Southdale Center, 10 Southdale Center. Approval is subject to the following conditions and findings: 1. The proposed rooftop dining is not in close proximity to existing residential uses. 2. The proposal meets the conditional use permit criteria in Section 36-612 of the City Code. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation are limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. 2. Amplified sound shall be subject to the city’s noise ordinance chapter 23, division 5 of the city code. 3. The rooftop dining area will be kept in a clean and orderly manner. 4. Service of alcoholic beverages requires the applicant to obtain appropriate liquor licenses in compliance with Edina Code Section 4 and Minnesota Statute 340A. 5. Required fencing shall meet the Minnesota State Building Code and must be reviewed and approved by the Building Department. 6. Lighting shall meet the requirements in Section 36-1260 of City Code. 7. The rooftop dining area shall be constructed per the plans date stamped 8/28/23 and 9/7/23. Puttshack Puttshack is leading the field with it's a one-of-its-kind, upscale tech-infused mini golf game, powered by patented Trackaball technology. Which we want to bring to the city of Edina. When our guests wrap up playing golf as that is the initial attraction to our venue, you're just steps away from Puttshack's globally inspired, mixologist-obsessed signature bar and restaurant. Our golf experience is (4) 9 Hole courses that take up to 30 minutes four our guests to complete that is open to guests of all ages prior to 7 pm. Post 7 pm we turn the music up slightly and is for guests 21+, with a DJ being involved on Thursday-Saturday. We try to optimize every location for the guest experience, and in the city of Edina we have the space to activate an exterior patio to create a world class experience for our visitors. We'd love for them to enjoy the beautiful summer/fall Minnesota has to offer by offering our world class menu on an exterior patio with views of the city. We've seen success with outdoor spaces in our other locations Miami, St. Louis and Scottsdale. It allows us to take full advantage of our individual spaces and we've seen amazing activation of outdoor spaces allowing unique experiences to each of our guests. In fact, it has become quite the destination at each location specifically Miami which offers beautiful views of the city. We've found our exterior spaces to be very successful and look forward to continued success in Minnesota. eg 4_, at; "t Greg Drain Director of Preconstruction CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 8 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 303 W Erie St, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60654 I puttshack.com ALIGN UP UP UP UP MA TC H LI N E 1/ A 152AMA TC H LI N E 1/ B 152B MA TC H LI N E 1/ A 152AMA TC H LI N E 1/ B 152B UP DN DN DN DN DN DN MM M M 30"48"30"48" 30"48"30"48"8'-8" 9'-0" HOOD21'-8"3'-6"HOOD 19'-0" HOOD 4'-0" HOOD 12"15"21'-3" S/S PANEL H. 80" AFF 7'-3" S/S PANEL H. 80" AFF 2'-8"2'-8" 5'-0" HOOD 1 ' - 4 " 4'-6" HOOD 1 ' - 4 " 12" 12'-6" HOOD 14'-2"2'-4" 17'-4" S/S PANEL H. 80" AFF 11'-10"14" 5'-0" HOOD WB-6 WB-3/5/6 WB-9WB-3/5/6 WB-9 WB-3 WB-4/6 WB-3 WB-3 WB-3WB-4/6WB-3 WB-3WB-7WB-4/6WB-3WB-3 WB-3 WB-2 WB-3 LA LA LA 12" 12'-0" 2'-3" 3'-6" 8 ' - 3 " 1'-6" 3 ' - 1 "10'-9"3'-11" 2'-0" 5'-7" 5'-7" 2'-0" 3'-6"4'-10"2'-0" 2'-6"6'-4" 23'-11" 2'-6" 2'-2" 11'-7" 3'-4" 9'-11" 2'-4"2'-2" 19'-9" 10'-5"10'-9" 12" 3 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 1 " 6 ' - 2 " 2 ' - 0 " A AA DD D DCHD D D CHDC HD INOUTHHD C DD D B B BB B BBBB BB B 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLEMENTARY AND WHAT IS CALLED FOR BY ANY WILL BE AS BINDING AS IF CALLED FOR BY ALL. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONVEY THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY STUDY AND COMPARE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK OF THE DOCUMENTS WITH THE WORK OF VENDOR PROVIDED INFORMATION ASSOCIATE WITH THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISTRIBUTE COMPLETE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMING THE WORK SO THAT NO PARTY RECEIVES LIMITED INFORMATION. 2. COORDINATION OF THE WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR REVIEW AND VERIFICATION OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS, VENDOR DESIGN DRAWINGS INCLUDING DELEGATED DESIGN WORK BY OTHERS, AND DIMENSIONS FOR ACCURACY AND FOR CONFIRMING THE WORK IS CONSTRUCTIBLE PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE WORK WITH THE BUILDING OWNER SO AS NOT TO DISTURB OR CAUSE DAMAGE TO OTHER TENANT SPACES OR BUILDING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE A CURRENT COPY OF PUBLISHED CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACTOR BUILDING GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS FROM THE BUILDING MANAGEMENT AND COMPLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IN WRITING OF CONFLICTS AND OBTAIN A WRITTEN CLARIFICATION FROM THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 3. DIMENSIONS DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS AND WORKPOINTS PROVIDED ARE TO STRUCTURAL GRID OR TO EXPOSED FACE OF A FINISH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND SHALL SECURE WRITTEN RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS FROM THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INITIATING THE WORK. DO NOT ADJUST DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS "CLEAR" OR "HOLD" WITHOUT WRITTEN DIRECTION FROM ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DIMENSIONS THAT DIFFER BY MORE THAN "1 INCH", INCLUDING THOSE MARKED "VIF" AND "+/-". 4. DELEGATED DESIGN WORK BY OTHERS SYSTEMS INDICATED AS DELEGATED DESIGN SHALL BE ENGINEERED, AND STAMPED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LICENSED IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE WORK. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THESE SYSTEMS TO SECURE AGENCY APPROVALS, INCLUDING REQUIRED FEES ASSOCIATED WITH PERMIT APPROVAL. THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING COMPREHENSIVE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS UTILIZING PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CRITERIA INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. • INTERIOR ARCHITECTS SHALL HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DISCOVERY, REMOVAL, PRESENCE, HANDLING, DISPOSAL OF, OR EXPOSURE OF PERSONS TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, MATERIALS, AND WASTES IN ANY FORM AT THE PROJECT SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: ASBESTOS, ASBESTOS PRODUCTS, PCB, MOLD, OR OTHER TOXIC OR HARMFUL SUBSTANCES. • QUESTIONS THAT ARISE RELATED TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE OWNER FOR RESOLUTION. INTERIOR ARCHITECTS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO DO WORK NOR RENDER OPINIONS RELATED TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. • CONTRACTORS SHALL REPORT THE PRESENCE OF MATERIAL OR ASSEMBLIES SUSPECTED TO CONTAIN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS UPON DISCOVERY TO THE OWNER. WORK SHALL BE HALTED UNTIL WRITTEN CLEARANCE TO CONTINUE HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE OWNER’S CERTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONSULTANTS. THE PROPOSED SOUTHDALE CENTER- HERBERGERS REDEVELOPMENT WILL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES ADOPTED AND ENFORCED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: • 2020 MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE (2018 IBC AS AMENDED) • 2020 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE (IEBC) • 2020 MINNESOTA CONSERVATION CODE FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS (2018 IEBC AS AMENDED) • 2020 MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL CODE - 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE - NFPA 70 • 2020 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE • 2020 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE • 2020 MINNESOTA ENERGY CODE - MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 1323, COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE • 2020 MINNESOTA FIRE CODE (2018 IFC AS AMENDED) • 2020 MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE • ALL EDINA CITY LOCAL CODES AND AMENDMENTS ALL CODE REFERENCES HEREIN ARE FROM THE IBC UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. PROJECT SITE CONTRACTOR, FURNITURE VENDOR, DESIGN BUILD SUB-CONTRACTORS AND OWNER’S SUBCONTRACTORS ARE ALL REQUIRED TO USE THE ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSION WORK POINTS ESTABLISHED FOR OPEN PLAN PENDANT LIGHTING AND FURNITURE CENTERLINES WHERE APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR AND VENDOR PREPARED SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL DOCUMENT THE ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSION WORK POINTS FOR THE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW PRIOR TO START OF WORK. FIELD LAYOUT REVIEW REQUESTED OF THE ARCHITECT MUST UTILIZE ON ESTABLISHED WORK POINTS. FLOOR CORE LOCATIONS SERVING FURNITURE ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FURNITURE VENDOR, INCLUDING FIELD VERIFICATION OF LAYOUT CONSISTENT WITH THE FLOOR CORING REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED HEREIN. KEY PLAN SITE LOCATION GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS DEFINITIONS FURNITURE, FLOOR CORE & LIGHTING COORDINATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOTES PROJECT DIRECTORY CODE REFERENCES SHEET INDEX SYMBOLS AREA OF WORK IA'S PROJECT MANUAL DATED ________ TITLED ________ ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. PROJECT MANUAL LIST OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS TBD TBD 1. STEEL CONSTRUCTION - STRUCTURAL STEEL (IBC SECTION 1705.2.1) 2. STEEL CONSTRUCTION - COLD-FORMED STEEL DECK (IBC SECTION 1705.2.2) 3. STEEL CONSTRUCTION - OPEN-WEB STEEL JOISTS AND JOIST GIRDERS (IBC TABLE 1705.2.3) 4. STEEL CONSTRUCTION - COLD-FORMED STEEL STRESSES (IBC TABLE 1705.2.4) 5. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION (IBC TABLE 1705.3) 6. INSPECTION OF WELDING (AISC 360-16) 7. INSPECTION OF HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS (AISC 360-16) 8. FIRE-RESISTANT PENETRATIONS AND JOINTS (IBC 1705.18) 2020 MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE adopts with amendments International Building Code 2018 (IBC 2018) CHAPTER 17 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: REFERENCE STRUCTURAL SHEET S.002 FOR STATEMENT AND SCHEUDLE OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS NOT IN CONTRACT TRUE TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH DELTA REVISION CLOUD AREA NAME 150 SF AREA TAG SHEET NUMBER ELEVATION NUMBER ON SHEET SHEET NUMBER ENLARGED CALLOUT ON SHEET ZONE TO BE CALLED OUT GRID NUMBERA STRUCTURAL GRID LINE FINISH TRANSITION BREAKLINE DOUBLE BREAKLINE CL CENTERLINE SYMBOL FINISH GRAIN DIRECTION F-01 LIGHT FIXTURE / FURNITURE TAG XX EQUIPMENT/ACCESSORY TAG ROOM NAME 101 150 SF A-7.0 1 Ref 1 Ref1Ref 1Ref ALIGN CLOUD KEYNOTEROOM TAG SECTION REFERENCE DETAIL SECTION REF DATUM A-8.6 1 DRAWING SCALE VIEW NUMBER 1 NORTH ARROW 101 1 A8.6 SIM________________ 1 A-8.6 SIM_________ 1 View Name 1/8" = 1'-0" A B01 A PARTITION TYPE (SEE PARTITION SCHEDULE) GLAZING SYSTEM TYPE INSULATION TYPE, WHERE OCCURS MATCHLINE /1 A101 VIEW / SHEET NUMBER FOR CORRESPONDING PLAN CONTINUATION 1 A101 SHEET NUMBER VIEW DIRECTION VIEW NUMBER ON SHEET AXON/PERSPECTIVE VIEW REF ELEVATION VIEW REF NEW 1HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION NEW 2HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION EXISTING 1HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION EXISTING 2HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION X'-X"CEILING HEIGHT TAG (AFF) ADJACENT TENANTS: KOWALSKI'S (GROCERY STORE) PEOPLE'S ORGANIC (RESTAURANT) Job No. Owner Approval Scale DELTA ISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION As indicated 7/28/2023 10:01:56 PMPUTTSHACK SOUTHDALE 47PTTS.0001.000 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 2023 G.000 COVER SHEET 22.7@ AT & AND L ANGLE # POUND OR NUMBER ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- ACP ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANEL AD AREA DRAIN ADJ ADJUSTABLE AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AGGR AGGREGATE ALUM ALUMINUM APROX APPROXIMATE ARCH ARCHITECTURAL ASB ASBESTOS ASPH ASPHALT AWP ACOUSTIC WALL PANEL AXON AXONOMETRIC ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- BC BACK OF CURB BD BOARD BITUM BITUMINOUS BLDG BUILDING BLK BLOCK BLKG BLOCKING BM BEAM BO BOTTOM OF BOT BOTTOM BR BULLET RESISTANT BTB BACK TO BACK ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- C CHANNEL CAB CABINET CB CATCH BASIN CEM CEMENTIOUS CER CERAMIC CI CAST IRON CJ CONSTRUCTION JOINT CL CENTERLINE CLG CEILING CLO CLOSET CLR CLEAR CM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CONSTR CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CORR CORRIDOR CPT CARPET CTSK COUNTERSUNK CNTR COUNTER CT CERAMIC TILE CTR CENTER ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- (D) DEMOLISH DBL DOUBLE DEPT DEPARTMENT DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN DEMO DEMOLISH DET DETAIL DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DISP DISPENSER DN DOWN DO DOOR OPENING DR DOOR DWR DRAWER DS DOWNSPOUT DWG DRAWING ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- E EAST (E) EXISTING EA EACH EEOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRICAL ELEV ELEVATION ELVTR ELEVATOR EMER EMERGENCY ENCL ENCLOSURE EPNL ELECTRICAL PANEL EQ EQUAL EQPT EQUIPMENT EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXG EXISTING EXT EXTERIOR ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- FA FIRE ALARM FAB FABRIC FB FLAT BAR FC FACE OF CURB FD FLOOR DRAIN FDN FOUNDATION FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FF FINISHED FLOOR FG FINISHED GRADE FH FIRE HYDRANT FHC FIRE HOSE CABINET FIN FINISH FL FLOOR FLSHG FLASHING FLUOR FLUORESCENT FO FACE OF FOC FACE OF CONCRETE FOF FACE OF FINISH FOS FACE OF STUDS FPRF FIREPROOFING FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC FRT FIRE RETARDANT TREATED FT FOOT OR FEET FTG FOOTING FURR FURRING FUT FUTURE FWP FABRIC WALL PANEL ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GB GRAB BAR GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GL GLASS / GLAZING GND GROUND GR GRADE GYP GYPSUM GWB GYPSUM BOARD ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- HB HOSE BIB HDWD HARDWOOD HDWR HARDWARE HM HOLLOW METAL HORIZ HORIZONTAL HPC HIGH PERFORMANCE COATINGS HR HOUR HT HEIGHT ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- ID INSIDE DIAMETER (DIM) INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR JAN JANITOR JT JOINT KIT KITCHEN LAB LABORATORY LAM LAMINATE LAV LAVATORY LKR LOCKER LT LIGHT ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT ADDRESS: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING OCCUPANCY: PROJECT AREA: BUILDING NO. OF STORIES: AREA PER FLOOR: SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY: BUILDING LIFE SAFETY INFO: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. ALL INTERIOR FINISHES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REFERENCED CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR FLAMMABILITY AND SMOKE DEVELOPED RATINGS AS WELL AS TOXICITY. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: WALL AND CEILINGS (PER ASTM E84 OR UL723) INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS, RAMPS AND EXIT PASSAGEWAYS CORRIDORS AND ENCLOSURE FOR EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAYS AND RAMPS: ROOMS AND ENCLOSED SPACES: FLOORING (PER ASTM E648 OR NFPA 253): CLASS II CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF NOT LESS THAN 0.22 WATTS PER SQUARE CENTIMETER FLAME SPREAD AND SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX CLASS A: FLAME SPREAD: 0 - 25; SMOKE-DEVELOPED: 0 - 450 CLASS B: FLAME SPREAD: 26 - 75; SMOKE-DEVELOPED: 0 -450 CLASS C: FLAME SPREAD: 76 - 200; SMOKE-DEVELOPED: 0 - 450 ZONE/DISTRICT: PARCEL NO.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DEFERRED SUBMITTALS & DELEGATED DESIGN WORK BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT: 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 COMMERCIAL TENANT RENOVATION OF AN INDOOR RECREATIONAL PUTTING EXPERIENCE ON THE SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL OF AN EXISTING BUILDING WHICH IS CURRENTLY VACANT. SCOPE ON THE SECOND LEVEL IS LIMITED TO AN ENTRANCE LOBBY WITH A NEW STAIR. THE PRIMARY SCOPE ON THE THIRD LEVEL INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION OF NON-STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS, CEILINGS, FINISHES, RAISED ACCESS FLOOR SYSTEMS, AND FURNITIRE AND EQUIPMENT TO SERVE RECREATIONAL PUTTING COURSES, COMMERCIAL KITCHEN, DINING/BAR SERVICE AREAS AND ASSOCIATED BACK-OF-HOUSE PROGRAM. AN OUTDOOR TERRACE OVER A RAISED PAVER SYSTEM WILL ALSO BE INCLUDED. I-B M – MERCANTILE, A-2 – RESTAURANT, A-3 – ASSEMBLY, B – BUSINESS, S-1 - STORAGE 29,017 SF 4 LEVELS INCLUDING BASEMENT 48,100 SF [NFPA 13 SPRINKLERS] , [VISUAL AND AUDIBLE FIRE ALARM], [EMERGENCY VOICE ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (EVACS)] A-2, A-3 OCCUPANCY - CLASS B A-2, A-3 OCCUPANCY - CLASS B B OCCUPANCY - CLASS B A-2, A-3 OCCUPANCY - CLASS C PCD-3 PID: 29-028-24-32-0021 TRACT A, EXCEPT THAT PART EMBRACED WITHIN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 028, RANGE 24. A FIRE ALARM, SPRINKLER, EXTERIOR SIGNAGE, CHANDALIER ANCHORAGE, LOW VOLTAGE, ROOFING, MECHANICAL SCREENING, WATERPROOFING, STEEL STAIRS AND LANDINGS AND GUARDRAILING, ALTERNATE MEANS OF ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ARCHITECT OF RECORD: INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, PC JASON COATS MN LICENSE # 58155 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 704.247.5317 J.COATS@INTERIORARCHITECTS.COM LANDLORD/BUILDING OWNER SIMON PROPERTY GROUP STEVEN PASKO 225 W WASHINGTON ST, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 317.695.5064 SPASKO@SIMON.COM MEP ENGINEER HENDERSON ENGINEERS PAUL KOLLAT 240 W 37TH, ST #304 NEW YORK, NY 10018 212.413.8400 PAUL.KOLLAT@HENDERSONENGINEERS.COM IA PROJECT CONTACT: INTERIOR ARCHITECTS (PC) NEIL PAULSEN 100 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10005 212.682.6909 N.PAULSEN@INTERIORARCHITECTS.COM NORTH CAROLINA 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 TEL (704) 626-8732 LIGHTING DESIGNER LIGHTHIVE KACI DELONG CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 407.484.6268 KDELONG@LIGHTHIVE.COM ALIGN TO ACCURATELY LOCATE FINISH FACES IN THE SAME PLANE CLEAR / CLR / HOLD DIMENSIONS ARE ABSOLUTES, UNOBSTRUCTED FROM FACE OF EXPOSED FINISH SURFACES. DEMOLISH TO DECONSTRUCT COMPLETE SYSTEM, HAUL, AND DISPOSE OF MATERIAL, INCLUDING APPROPRIATE PULL BACK AND TERMINATION/CAPPING OF RELATED BUILDING SERVICES SALVAGE DIS-ASSEMBLE, CONVEY OR STORE MATERIAL PER OWNERS INSTRUCTIONS REUSE SALVAGE, STORE ON SITE, RE-INSTALL INSTALL ON-SITE OPERATIONS INCLUDING UNLOADING, TEMPORARY STORAGE, UN-PACKING, ASSEMBLY, PLACING, ANCHORING, APPLYING, FINISHING, PROTECTING, AND CLEANING COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL ELEMENTS, EQUIPMENT, AND SYSTEMS FURNISH PROCURE AND STORE ON-SITE MATERIAL FOR INSTALLATION BY OTHERS PROVIDE FURNISH AND INSTALL COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL SYSTEM NOTIFY TO INFORM THE STATED PARTIES IN WRITING AND SEEK RESOLUTION PRIOR TO COMENCING WORK GENERAL G.000 COVER SHEET G.002 ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS G.003 TYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHT & SIGNAGE DETAILS G.004 DOOR AND HARDWARE SCHEDULES G.007 WALL PARTITION TYPES G.008 FLOOR TRANSITION AND WALL BASE DETAILS G.009 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS G.100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) G.101 EXITING DIAGRAM-1ST FLOOR G.102 EXITING DIAGRAM-2ND FLOOR G.103 EXITING DIAGRAM-3RD FLOOR ARCHITECTURAL A.102 OVERALL CONSTRUCTION PLAN - 2ND FLOOR A.102R OVERALL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - 2ND FLOOR A.103 OVERALL CONSTRUCTION PLAN - 3RD FLOOR A.103R OVERALL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN-3RD FLOOR A.110A 2ND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN-NORTH A.111A 3RD FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN-NORTH A.111B 3RD FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN-SOUTH A.120A 2ND FLOOR POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN-NORTH A.121A 3RD FLOOR POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN-NORTH A.121B 3RD FLOOR POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN-SOUTH A.140A 2ND FLOOR FINISH PLAN-NORTH A.141A 3RD FLOOR FINISH PLAN-NORTH A.141B 3RD FLOOR FINISH PLAN-SOUTH A.142A 2ND FLOOR WALL FINISH PLAN - NORTH A.143A 3RD FLOOR WALL FINISH PLAN - NORTH A.143B 3RD FLOOR WALL FINISH PLAN - SOUTH A.151A 2ND FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - NORTH A.152A 3RD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - NORTH A.152B 3RD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - SOUTH A.153A 3RD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING COORDINATION PLAN - NORTH A.153B 3RD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING COORDINATION PLAN - SOUTH A.160A 2ND FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN - NORTH A.161A 3RD FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN - NORTH A.161B 3RD FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN - SOUTH A.181 LINE OF SIGHT STUDY A.201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) A.211 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.212 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.213 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.214 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.215 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.216 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.217 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.218 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.219 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.220 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.221 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.222 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.223 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.224 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.225 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.226 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.227 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.228 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.229 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.400A ENLARGED RESTROOM PLANS A.400B ENLARGED BAR PLANS A.401A RESTROOM INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.401B RESTROOM INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.401C RESTROOM INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.801 DETAILS A.802 RAISED PAVER DETAILS A.803 RAISED PAVER DETAILS A.804 RAISED PAVER DETAILS A.805 RAISED PAVER STRUCTURAL AND FIRE TESTING A.806 DETAILS A.820 TYP CEILING DETAILS A.830A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 2) CLOAK PASS THROUGH A.830B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 2) CLOAK PASS THROUGH A.830C MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 2) CLOAK PASS THROUGH A.831 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 3) GUEST GARMENT A.832 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 4) SALE MARKETING DESK A.833 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 6) HOST STAND A.834A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 8) SECONDARY BAR A.834B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 8) SECONDARY BAR A.834C MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 8) SECONDARY BAR A.834D MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 8) SECONDARY BAR A.835 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 10) BALL DISPENSER A.836 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 11) DRINK TABLE A.837 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 12A) TELEVISION SURROUND WITH GLOBE LIGHT A.838 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 12B) TELEVISION SURROUND WITHOUT GLOBE A.839 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 13) BALL LIFTER @ COURSE A.840A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 16) MEN'S BATHROOM VANITY A.840B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 16) MEN'S BATHROOM VANITY A.841A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 17) WOMEN'S BATHROOM VANITY A.841B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 17) WOMEN'S BATHROOM VANITY A.842 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 18) MANAGERS OFFICE DESK A.843A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 19) GENDER INCLUSIVE BATHROOM VANITY A.843B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 19) GENDER INCLUSIVE BATHROOM VANITY A.844 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 23) DJ BOOTH A.845A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 24) MAIN BAR A.845B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 24) MAIN BAR A.845C MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 24) MAIN BAR A.846A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846C MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846D MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846E MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846F MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846G MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.846H MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 25) BAR GANTRIES A.847 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 28) DO OFFICE SHELVING A.848 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 31) MAIN BAR ISLAND A.849A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 32) MAIN BAR UPPER CABINETS A.849B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 32) MAIN BAR UPPER CABINETS A.849C MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 32) MAIN BAR UPPER CABINETS A.849D MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 32) MAIN BAR UPPER CABINETS A.849E MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 32) MAIN BAR UPPER CABINETS A.849F MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 32) MAIN BAR UPPER CABINETS A.850 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34A) DINING HEIGHT BANQUETTE A.851A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34B) DINING HEIGHT BANQUETTE A.851B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34B) COUNTER HEIGHT BANQUETTE A.852A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34C) ROUND BANQUETTE A.852B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34C) ROUND BANQUETTE A.853A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34D) COUNTER HEIGHT BANQUETTE A.853B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 34D) COUNTER HEIGHT BANQUETTE A.854 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 35) BANQUETTE SCREEN A.855 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 36) WAIT STATION © INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. MAX MAXIMUM MC MEDICINE CABINET MECH MECHANICAL MEMB MEMBRANE MEOR MECHANICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD MFR MANUFACTURER MH MANHOLE MIN MINIMUM MIR MIRROR MISC MISCELLANEOUS MO MASONRY OPENING MTD MOUNTED MTL METAL MUL MULLION ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- (N) NEW N NORTH NAT NATURAL NC NOISE CRITERION (NOISE LEVEL LIMIT) NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NOM NOMINAL NRC NOISE REDUCTION COEFFICIENT NTS NOT TO SCALE ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- OA OVERALL OC ON CENTER OCC OCCUPANCY OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER (DIM) OFF OFFICE OPNG OPENING OTS OPEN TO STRUCTURE OPP OPPOSITE ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- P PAINT PERP PERPENDICULAR PL PLATE PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PLAS PLASTER PLUMB PLUMBING PLWD PLYWOOD PP POWER POLE PR PAIR PRCST PRECAST PT PRESSURE TREATED PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER PTD/R COMBINATION PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER AND WASTE RECEPTACLE PVB POLYVINYL BUTYRAL PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PLASTIC) ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- QT QUARRY TILE ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- (R) RELOCATE RAD RADIUS RD ROOF DRAIN REF REFERENCE REFR REFRIGERATOR RF RESILIENT FLOORING REINF REINFORCED REQ'D REQUIRED RESIL RESILIENT RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING RWL RAIN WATER LEADER ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- S SOUTH SAB SOUND ATTENUATION BLANKET SAFB SOUND ATTENUATION FIRE BLANKET SC SOLID CORE SCD SEAT COVER DISPENSER SCHED SCHEDULE SD SOAP DISPENSER SLT SEALANT SDT STATIC DISSIPATIVE TILE SEC SECURITY SECT SECTION SEOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SFRM SPRAY FIRE-RESISTIVE MATERIAL SG SAFETY GLAZING SH SHELF SHWR SHOWER SHT SHEET SHTG SHEATHING SIM SIMILAR SND SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER SNR SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE SOB SYMBOL ON BACKGROUND SPEC SPECIFICATION SQ SQUARE SS STAINLESS STEEL SSD SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SSK SERVICE SINK SSM SOLID SURFACE MATERIAL ST STONE STA STATION STC SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE STRUCT STRUCTURAL SUSP SUSPENDED ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- T TREAD TB TOWEL BAR TBD TO BE DETERMINED TCOM TELECOMMUNICATION TEL TELEPHONE TER TERRAZZO T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE THK THICK TOC TOP OF CONCRETE TPD TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TR TRANSITION TV TELEVISION TOW TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- UNF UNFINISHED UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED UR URINAL ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERT VERTICAL VEST VESTIBULE VIF VERIFY IN FIELD VNR VENEER ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- W WEST W/ WITH WC WATER CLOSET / WALL COVERING WD WOOD WLD WELDED W/O WITHOUT WO WHERE OCCURS WP WATERPROOF WRB WEATHER RESISTANT BARRIER WT WEIGHT / WINDOW TREATMENT ----------------------- -------------------------------------------- A.856A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 45) SECONDARY BAR A.856B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 45) SECONDARY BAR A.857A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 46) WAINSCOT A.857B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 46) WAINSCOT A.858 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 47) TEE TIME TV BOX A.859 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 53) DRINK LEDGE A.860A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 55) BANQUETTE DIVIDER SCREEN A.860B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 55) BANQUETTE DIVIDER SCREEN A.861 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 57) NESTING TABLE A.862A MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 61) BANQUETTE DIVIDER SCREEN A.862B MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 61) BANQUETTE DIVIDER SCREEN A.863 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 62) TEE TIME TV BOX A.864 MILLWORK DETAILS (MW- 101) ASSOCIATE LOUNGE SHELVING A.920 LIGHTING & ZONING SCHEDULE A.920A PLUMBING SCHEDULES A.920B ACCESSORY SCHEDULES A.921 LIGHTING SCHEDULE A.922 SIGNAGE SCHEDULE A.923 SIGNAGE SCHEDULE A.924 FINISH SCHEDULE A.925 FINISH SCHEDULE A.926 FINISH SCHEDULE A.927 FINISH SCHEDULE A.928 FINISH SCHEDULE A.929 FINISH SCHEDULE A.930 FINISH SCHEDULE A.931 FINISH SCHEDULE A.932 FINISH SCHEDULE STRUCTURAL S.001 DESIGN PARAMETERS AND GENERAL NOTES S.002 STRUCTURAL SPECIAL INSPECTIONS S.203 LEVEL 3 FRAMING PLAN S.204 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S.205 LEVEL 2 STAIR FRAMING PLAN S.300 FRAMING DETAILS MECHANICAL M-001 MECHANICAL ABBREVIATIONS, NOTES AND SYMBOLS M-200 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - OVERALL M-201 MECHANICAL DUCTWORK PLAN - ENLARGED M-220 MECHANICAL ROOF PLAN M-300 MECHANICAL DETAILS M-301 MECHANICAL DETAILS M-304 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT M-305 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT M-306 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT M-307 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT M-400 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES M-401 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES M-500 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS M-501 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS M-502 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS M-600 ENERGY COMLIANCE FORMS M-601 ENERGY COMLIANCE FORMS ELECTRICAL E-001 ELECTRICAL ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS E-002 ELECTRICAL NOTES AND DETAILS E-003 ELECTRICAL ONE- LINE DIAGRAM E-004 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES E-100 POWER PLAN E-101 POWER PLAN- ENLARGED E-102 EQUIPMENT CONNECTION PLAN E-103 EQUIPMENT CONNECTION PLAN-ROOF E-200 LIGHTING PLAN E-201 LIGHTING PLAN - ENLARGED E-300 LIGHTING CONTROLS E-301 LIGHTING CONTROL SCHEDULES E-302 LIGHTING SCHEDULES E-400 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES E-401 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES E-402 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES E-500 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS E-501 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS E-502 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS E-600 ENERGY COMLIANCE FORMS PLUMBING P-001 PLUMBING ABBREVIATIONS, NOTES AND SYMBOLS P-002 PLUMBING WASTE AND VENT RISER DIAGRAM P-110 PLUMBING WASTE AND VENT PLAN - LEVEL 3 P-111 PLUMBING WATER AND GAS PLAN - LEVEL 3 P-120 PLUMBING PLAN - KITCHEN P-121 PLUMBING PLAN - MAIN AND SECONDARY BAR P-130 PLUMBING ROOF PLAN P-300 PLUMBING DETAILS P-301 PLUMBING DETAILS P-400 PLUMBING SCHEDULES P-500 PLUMBING SPECIFICATIONS P-501 PLUMBING SPECIFICATIONS FOODSERVICE QF001 FOODSERVICE GENERAL NOTES, SHEET INDEX QF100 FOODSERVICE PLAN QF101 FOODSERVICE EQUIPMEN PLAN QF102 FOODSERVICE SCHEDULE QF103 FOODSERVICE SCHEDULE QF104 FOODSERVICE SCHEDULE QF201 FOODSERVICE PLUMBING IN-SLAB ROUGH-IN PLACE QF202 FOODSERVICE PLUMBING ABOVE SLAB ROUGH-IN PLACE QF301 FOODSERVICE ELECTRICAL ROUGH-IN PLACE QF401 FOODSERVICE SPECIAL CONDITIONS PLAN QF402 FOODSERVICE BEVERAGE CONDUIT PLAN QF403 FOODSERVICE MECHANICAL CONNECTION PLAN QF404 FOODSERVICE CRITICAL DIMENSION PLAN QF405 FOODSERVICE FLOOR CURB AND DEPRESSION PLAN QF601 FOODSERVICE DETAILS QF701-718 WALK-IN AND EXHAUST HOOD SHOP DRAWINGS CLIENT CONTACT PUTTSHACK GREG DRAIN 303 W.ERIE ST. CHICAGO, IL 60654 847.878.2082 GREG.DRAIN@PUTTSHACK.COM CONTRACTOR ARCO/MURRAY BRENDAN BARKER 113 N MAY STREET, 2ND FLOOR CHICAGO, IL 60607 331.290.5478 BBARKER@ARCOMURRAY.COM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALLACE DESIGN COLLECTIVE MICHAEL LANCEY 1703 WYANDOTTE ST., SUITE 200 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64108 816.421.8282 MICHAEL.LANCEY@WALLACE.DESIGN 6 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 6 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 07.28.2023 DN MM MM30"48"30"48"B BB B B MMMM ALIGN ALIGN 1. DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING AS BUILT FIELD CONDITIONS, INCLUDING FIELD MEASUREMENTS PRIOR TO START OF WORK, NOTIFY ARCHITECT WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. 2. USE TYPE "X" GWB ON FIRE RATED PARTITIONS. 3. PROVIDE INSULATION FULL DEPTH OF STUD OF A TYPE AND IN LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE PLAN. INSULATION AT RATED PARTITIONS TO BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE, MINERAL WOOL OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED IN THE PROJECT JURISDICTION. 4. SEE A-8 DETAIL SHEET SERIES FOR TYPICAL PARTITION DETAILS, EXTENTS OF FRAMING AND FINISHES. 5. FIRE SAFE PENETRATIONS AT FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITIONS PER APPLICABLE UL ASSEMBLY. SEE A-8 SHEET SERIES FOR DETAILS. 6. MAINTAIN INTEGRITY OF EXISTING FIRE RESISTANT RATED ASSEMBLIES FOR PENETRATIONS. 7. PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED AT LOCATIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: GRAB BARS, SHELVING, OVERHEAD CABINETS, SIGNAGE, TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES, WALL MOUNT. EQUIPMENT, ETC. [ALL BLOCKING TO BE FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD OR 16 GA (MIN) SHEET METAL.] 8. REFER TO A-2 SHEET SERIES FOR POWER & SIGNAL DEVICE LOCATIONS. 9. EXPOSED GYPSUM BOARD OUTSIDE CORNERS SHALL HAVE A CONTINUOUS METAL CORNER BEAD. 10. DIMENSIONS TAKEN FROM PERIMETER EXTERIOR WINDOW WALL ARE TAKEN FROM THE INSIDE FACE OF THE VERTICAL MULLION. DIMENSIONS MARKED VERIFY, SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO START OF WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH HVAC, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, DELEGATED DESIGN FIRE PROTECTION AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND REPORT TO THE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES FOR CORRECTION AND ADJUSTMENT PRIOR TO START OF WORK. NO ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE FOR INCREASED COST DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR’S LACK OF COORDINATION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES DENOTED IN THE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE AS-BUILT CONDITION AND THE DRAWINGS. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR THE COST AND SCHEDULE OF UPGRADING EXISTING ASSEMBLIES DENOTED AS FIRE RATED TO A CODE COMPLIANT LEVEL. 13. PATCH AND REPAIR PARTITIONS AFTER DEMOLITION WHERE DAMAGE HAS OCCURRED AT UNPROTECTED LOCATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT DEMOLITION ACTIVITY MAY OCCUR BEYOND WORK LIMITS SHOWN ON DEMOLITION PLAN DUE TO CONCEALED CONDITIONS. 14. REQUIRED MARKING AND IDENTIFICATION OF PARTITIONS. WHERE THERE IS AN ACCESSIBLE CONCEALED FLOOR, FLOOR-CEILING OR ATTIC SPACE, FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS OR ANY OTHER WALL REQUIRED TO HAVE PROTECTED OPENINGS OR PENETRATIONS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY AND PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNS OR STENCILING IN THE CONCEALED SPACE. SUCH IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 15 FEET (4572 MM) OF THE END OF EACH WALL AND AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 30 FEET (9144 MM) MEASURED HORIZONTALLY ALONG THE WALL OR PARTITION AND INCLUDE LETTERING NOT LESS THAN 3 INCHES (76 MM) IN HEIGHT WITH A MINIMUM 3/8-INCH (9.5 MM) STROKE IN A CONTRASTING COLOR INCORPORATING THE SUGGESTED WORDING, “FIRE AND/OR SMOKE BARRIER — PROTECT ALL OPENINGS,” OR OTHER WORDING BASED ON LOCAL JURISDICTION. REFER TO PARTITION SCHEDULE, PLAN AND LEGEND TO IDENTIFY APPLICABLE PARTITIONS. SHEET NOTES FLOOR TO CEILING WINDOW PARTIAL HEIGHT WINDOW (WITH SILL) DOOR TAG (DOOR NUMBER BASED ON ROOM NUMBER WITH ALPHA SUFFIX IF MULTIPLE) A EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN NEW 1HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION NEW 2HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION NEW CONSTRUCTION NEW MILLWORK WITH OVERHEAD CABINETS SURFACE MTD FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHER AND CABINET FE FEC +42" FIRE PROTECTION RISER CABINETFPR1047AB01 A EXISTING 1HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION EXISTING 2HR FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITION PARTITION TYPE (SEE PARTITION SCHEDULE) GLAZED OPENING SYSTEM TYPE INSULATION TYPE, WHERE OCCURS ? KEYNOTE 202 TYPE DESCRIPTION - NONE A ACOUSTIC T THERMAL M MINERAL WOOL PARTITION LEGEND INDICATES MOUNTING HEIGHT A.F.F. NEW RAISED ACCESS FLOOR NEW RAISED ROOF WALKWAY A.214 2 MATCHLINE 1/A111A MATCHLINE 1/A111B MATCHLINE 1/A111A MATCHLINE 1/A111B A6 A6 B3 B3 SEMI-PRIVATE DINING ROOM 300 BAR AREA 3 302 BAR AREA 4 305 BAR AREA 1 304 BAR AREA 2 303 TERRACE 325A CIRCULATION 329 MAIN BAR 301 2 - EMERALD COURSE 307 1 - AMBER COURSE ACCESSIBLE 306 HOST/ CHECK -IN 324 B3 BC3 A6 A.227 2 31 A.214 1 A.216 2 A.216 3 A.2143 A.216 4 A.215 2 A.2161 A.215 1 A.213 6 7 10 5 A.213 2 3 4 1 A.2174 1 2 3 A.2184 1 2 3 A.215 3 B3 B3 B3 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 A.217 5 A.400B 1 MW-36 MW-24 MW-6 MW-31 DN DN 325308AEXIT VEST. 328 328A328B 104 3'-3"5'-10"16'-11"19'-0"4'-0" 1'-0" +1' - 1 1/2" +1' - 1 1/2" +1' - 1 1/2" +1' - 1 1/2" +0" CL9'-5"57'-10"EQ.EQ.7'-9 1/2"6'-6 1/2"(VIF)8'-9 1/2"3'-0 1/2"1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 A A B B C C D D E E F F SERVICE AREA 325B 1:20 +1' - 1 1/2" +0" 3'-0"1'-3"1'-3"1'-3"24'-6" +1' - 1 1/2" +1' - 1 1/2" +1' - 1 1/2" +1' - 1 1/2" TERRACE 325A N.I.C LOW ROOF OPEN TO ABOVE 104 18'-0"4'-0"2'-0"24'-0" 22'-6"4'-2"7'-9 1/2"6'-0" CLR(VIF)± 10'-0"(VIF)±22'-5 3/4"(VIF)9'-4"6'-0" CLR23'-2"8'-10"6'-6"31'-9"11"13'-1"10'-11"24'-0" A.228 1 145 145 145 145 145 111 111 145 145145 R 7' - 0"8'-6"DN CL1'-3"3'-2"6'-0"145 +0" 1:12 12'-0 1/2"10'-5 1/2"18'-1"4'-0"1'-11"25'-1"6'-6"1'-8"F8 10'-6" A.213 A.213 8 A.213 9 11 A.216 5 A.219 2 A.220 1 A.228 2 UP 9 RISERS @ 6.97" EA. = 5.23' (5' 2-3/4" USEABLE) 8 TREADS @ 11" EA. 1 LANDING 8 RISERS @ 6.97" EA. = 4.65' (4' 7-3/4" USEABLE) 7 TREADS @ 11" EA. 1 LANDING 16 RISERS @ 6.97" EA. = 9.29' (9' 3-1/2" USEABLE) 15 TREADS @ 11" EA. 1 LANDING 144 144 144 144 144144 144 144 144 144 144 MW-10 BALL DISPENSER MW-10 BALL DISPENSER MW-11 DRINK TABLE x9 MW-12 COURSE TV SURROUND x9 MW-13 BALL LIFTER MW-13 BALL LIFTER MW-12 COURSE TV SURROUND x9 MW-11 DRINK TABLE x9 MW-23 MW-62 MW-62 COUNTER HEIGHT 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 108 144 144144 COUNTER HEIGHT MW-35 MW-34C COUNTER HEIGHT - OPP. MW-55 OPP. MW-47 MW-61 OPP. MW-34B DINING HEIGHT MW-34C COUNTER HEIGHT - MW-55 MW-61 F6 F6F6 144 F6 F6 10'-6"12'-6 1/2"1'-2 1/2"132 102 101 136 136 133 124 133 105 104 102102102 129 135 129 117 129 111 122 134 134 101 101 46'-11"1'-8 1/2"3'-5"9'-8 1/2"10'-11"13'-2"3'-5 1/2" DN +0" 1:12 +1' - 3"1'-0"15'-0"1'-0"10"4'-0"24'-9"6'-4"7'-8 1/2"6'-7"38'-11 1/2"6'-4"22'-6" DN 1:12+1' - 3" +0"1'-0"6'-5"9'-7 1/2"+0" DN 1'-0"2'-0"101 106 101 122 120 120 103 122 124 137 137 129 137 MW-47 MW-24 MW-45 MW-8 F8 F8 4 1/2" KITCHEN 308 VIF 46'-1 1/2" R.O. 311A VIF 21'-11" R.O. VIF 7'-7 1/2" R.O. 325B 325A A.2012 A.201 1 146 146 101 111 144 MW-35 144 +10 1/2" A.4021 2 4 2 G.002 ____________ 1 G.002 ____________ 2 G.002 ____________ 2 G.002 ____________ MILLWORK LEGEND MILLWORK TAG - SEE INDEX SHEET G-000 FOR MILLWORK COORDINATION DETAIL REFERENCES AND MILLWORK SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION Job No. Owner Approval Scale DELTA ISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"7/28/2023 10:28:21 PMPUTTSHACK SOUTHDALE 47PTTS.0001.000 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 2023 A.111A 3RD FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN-NORTH 22.7NORTH CAROLINA 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 TEL (704) 626-8732 KEYNOTESPARTITION SCHEDULE TYPE FIRE RATING UL #DESCRIPTION SSMA # STUD SPACING (IN) MAX DEFLECTION THICKNESS DETAIL REF.MAX HT A2 1 U423 U425 1-HR. RATED 3 5/8" METAL STUDS, FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" TYPE-X GYPBOARD EACH SIDE. 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 5" 10/G007 1/G007 A6 2 U412 2-HR. RATED 2 1/2" METAL STUDS., FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH TWO LAYERS 5/8" TYPE-X GYPBOARD EACH SIDE. 250S125-33 24 L/240 0' - 5" 7/G007 1/G007 B3 NR NR NON-RATED 3 5/8" METAL STUDS, FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE. 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 5" 4/G007 <varies> B6 NR NR NON-RATED 6" METAL STUDS, FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE. 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 7 1/2" 4/G007 1/G007 BC3 NR NR NON-RATED 3 5/8" METAL STUDS, FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH ONE FULL HEIGHT LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD ON ONE SIDE, THE OTHER 5/8" GYPBOARD LAYER TO EXTEND 6" ABOVE CEILING 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 4 1/2" 5/G007 1/G007 D3 NR NR 3 5/8" METAL STUDS WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE (PARTITION TERMINATES AT UNDERSIDE OF CEILING). 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 5" 12/G007 1/G007 F1 NR NR 7/8" METAL FURRING HAT CHANNELS WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD ON EXTERIOR. 087F125-33 16 L/240 0' - 1 1/2" 1/G007 F3 NR NR 7/8" METAL FURRING HAT CHANNELS OVER RESILIENT SOUND ISOLATION CLIPS WITH TWO LAYERS 5/8" GYPBOARD ON EXTERIOR. 087F125-33 24 L/240 0' - 3" 1/G007 F6 NR NR 2 1/2" METAL STUD FURRING WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD ON EXTERIOR (1/2" AIR SPACE BETWEEN STUD AND WALL). 250S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 3" 8/G007 1/G007 F8 NR NR 3 5/8" METAL STUD FURRING WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD ON EXTERIOR (1/2" AIR SPACE BETWEEN STUD AND WALL). 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 4 1/2" 8/G007 <varies> G3 NR NR 3 5/8" METAL STUDS WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE. PARTIAL-HEIGHT WALL - SEE PLANS/ELEVATIONS FOR HEIGHT. 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 5" 9/G007 1/G007 G4 NR NR 3 5/8" METAL STUDS WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE. PARTIAL-HEIGHT WALL - SEE PLANS/ELEVATIONS FOR HEIGHT. 362S125-33 16 L/240 0' - 6 1/2" 9/G007 1/G007 J05 NR NR TWO ROWS 3 5/8" METAL STUDS , FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE (1" MINIMUM AIR SPACE BETWEEN STUD ROWS). 362S125-33 16 L/240 1' - 6" 1/G007 J06 NR NR TWO ROWS 3 5/8" METAL STUDS , FULL HEIGHT [SLAB-TO-SLAB] WITH ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPBOARD EACH SIDE (1" MINIMUM AIR SPACE BETWEEN STUD ROWS). 362S125-33 16 L/240 1' - 10" 1/G007 NO.DESCRIPTION 101 TENANT LEASE LINE. PROJECT TEAM TO VERIFY IN FIELD. 102 G.C. TO INFILL WALL WITH LIKE MATERIAL. MAINTAIN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE RATING OF ADJACENT WALLS. 103 SCRAPE COLUMNS ONLY AS NEEDED TO INSTALL FRAMING AND DRYWALL. REFER TO FINISH PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 104 EXISTING BUILDING STAIR TOWER TO REMAIN. 105 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATOR TO REMAIN. 106 EXISTING BUILDING CORRIDOR TO REMAIN. 108 EXISTING WALL BY LANDLORD TO REMAIN. SEE LANDLORD BASE BUILDING DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 NEW FULL HEIGHT GYP WALL. CONFIRM WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND IF WALL IS IN LANDLORD OR TENANT SCOPE. 117 NEW DOUBLE DOOR. REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE FOR MORE INFORMATION. 120 INSULATED WALLS TYP. AT EXTERIOR WALLS. CONFIRM WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND IF WALL IS IN LANDLORD OR TENANT SCOPE. 122 AREA OF RAISED FLOOR PLATFORM. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 124 REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INTERIOR SPACES, WALL HEIGHTS, AND WALL OPENING. 129 PREPARE EXISTING OPENING FOR NEW GLAZING SYSTEM AND DOORS. REFER TO ELEVATIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AND DOOR SCHEDULE FOR MORE INFORMATION. 132 NEW STRUCTURAL GRAND STAIR. REFER TO ELEVATIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 133 NEW RAILING OVER TWO STORY OPENING. REFER TO ELEVATIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 134 NEW EXTERIOR PAVER SYSTEM. REFER TO ELEVATIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 135 1:20 SLOPE AT EXTERIOR FOR EXITING. REFER TO ELEVATIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 136 PORTION OF FURRED OUT WALL TO EXTEND TO TOP OF THIRD FLOOR SLAB. TO BE FINISHED WILL MILLWORK CAP (WD-3) TO ALIGN WITH CONCRETE FLOOR. 137 NEW OPERABLE STOREFRONT GLASS DOOR SYSTEM. REFER TO ELEVATIONS FOR DESIGN INTENT AND DIMENSIONS. 144 EXISTING COLUMNS/BUTTRESSES TO REMAIN. 145 EXISTING WALL(S) TO REMAIN. 146 PROVIDE EXTERIOR CORRUGATED METAL PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING ADJACENT IN STYLE, SIZE, ASSEMBLY, AND INSTALLATION SO TO ACHIEVE A UNIFORM APPEARANCE. GC SHALL COORDINATE WITH LANDLORD FOR SPECIFICATION AND SUBMIT TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR PARTITION PLAN-NORTH © INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. 1 SD DELIVERABLE 04/07/20236 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 07.28.2023 OPEN TO LEVEL 3 TERRACE OPEN TO LEVEL 3 TERRACE OPEN TO LEVEL 3 TERRACE OPEN TO LEVEL 3 TERRACE S-18 TRIMLESS CHANNEL LETTERS ON STEEL FRAME S-60 WINDOW GRAPHICS 12'-4"30'-4"19'-3"5'-3"AREA OF WORK BY OTHERS S-19 TRIMLESS CHANNEL LETTERS S-18 TRIMLESS CHANNEL LETTERS ON STEEL FRAME S-22 VINYL WINDOW GRAPHICS 6'-0"7'-0"14'-5"2'-3"5'-3"19'-3" SHEET NOTES 1. ELEVATIONS PROVIDE FOR REFERENCE ONLY TO COORDINATE SIGNAGE DELEGATED DESIGN. SHELL IMPROVEMENTS ARE BY LANDLORD UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 2. EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS BY LANDLORD ARE DOCUMENTED BASED ON DESIGN DRAWINGS, NOT YET CONSTRUCTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND CONFIRM EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS ONCE CONSTRUCTED AND CONTACT ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 3. WHERE EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE DOCUMENTED, THEY ARE PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF COORDINATION ONLY AND DO NOT INCLUDE CONCEALED CONDITIONS OR EXISTING NON-COMPLIANT WORK. Job No. Owner Approval Scale DELTA ISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"7/28/2023 6:13:43 PMPUTTSHACK SOUTHDALE 47PTTS.0001.000 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 2023 A.201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)22.7NORTH CAROLINA 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 TEL (704) 626-8732 © INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 6 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 6 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN MM MMB BB B MMMM N.I.C 24'-0"95'-6 1/2" CLCL EQ.6'-6"EQ. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A B C D E F LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-51 Z58 LT-12 Z10 LT-55 Z84 LT-55 Z84 LT-55 Z84 LT-55 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-53 Z85 LT-10 Z98 LT-10 Z29 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-06 Z53 LT-06 Z53 S-04 Z90 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-08 Z23 LT-51 Z58 LT-53 Z83 LT-55 Z83 LT-10 Z56 607 611 606 601 TYP. 602 607 603 603 608 609 607 618 TYP.617 607 612 TYP. 606 614 602 604 TYP. 616 S-62 EXTERIOR LED AT MURAL FRAME LT-53 Z53 A24 (x2) Z86 A27 Z48 A27 Z48 A27 Z49 A27 Z49 A27 Z49 CL EQ.24'-0"CLCLCLCLCL2'-6"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"CLCLCLCL 13'-4"5'-3 1/2"5'-3 1/4"13'-4"CLCL5'-8"11'-5 1/2"CLCL12'-7 1/4"4'-10"CL8'-4"CLCLCL 3'-6"9'-2"9'-2"CLEQEQCLCL5'-0 1/2"9'-10"CLCLEQ.EQ.3'-0"CL EQ EQ LT-10 Z1 LT-10 Z1 LT-10 Z1 LT-10 Z1 CL1'-8"S-62CL2'-6"603 603 A24 (AT EACH STAIR NOSING)CL3'-11 1/2"5'-6 1/2" CEILING MOUNTED ONE SIDED EXIT SIGN CEILING MOUNTED TWO SIDED EXIT SIGN WALL MOUNTED EXIT SIGN LINEAR FLUORESCENT 2X4 FLUORESCENT TROFFER FIXTURE 2X2 FLUORESCENT TROFFER FIXTURE RECESSED DOWNLIGHT RECESSED SQUARE DOWNLIGHT RECESSED WALL WASHER CEILING MOUNTED PENDANT WALL MOUNTED SCONCE NEW TYP. CEILING GRID (WHITE - BOH) NEW GWB CEILING / SOFFIT LINEAR FLUORESCENT WALL WASHER CEILING MOUNTED SPECIALTY PENDANT CEILING MOUNTED WIRELESS NETWORK ROUTER SUSPENDED DIRECT/INDIRECT LINEAR FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE RECESSED FLUORESCENT LINEAR FIXTURE TRIMLESS AT GYP BD CEILING UNDER CABINET LED FIXTURE LED STRIP COVE LIGHTING STEM MOUNTED LED SPOT LIGHT RCP LEGEND EXISTING CEILING GRID EXISTING GWB CEILING / SOFFIT OPEN TO DECK NEW TYP. CEILING GRID (BLACK - FOH) A ZoneX LIGHT FIXTURE & ZONE TAG REFER TO LIGHTING SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1. VERIFY AS-BUILT FIELD CONDITIONS AND LOCATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW PLUMBING, AUDIO VISUAL, HVAC DUCTWORK AND PIPING, STRUCTURAL FRAMING, ELECTRICAL BUS DUCT AND CONDUIT BANKS, ELECTRICAL PULL BOXES, FIRE PROTECTION LINES AND RELATED WORK TO DETERMINE AND COORDINATE BEST CEILING FRAMING, POINTS OF ACCESS AND CLEARANCES AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK. 2. PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS WHERE REQUIRED IN GYP.BD. CEILING INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO FIRE SMOKE DAMPERS, FIRE LIFE SAFETY J-BOXES, FAN COILS AND VAV BOXES PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS, CONDUIT BANK PULL BOXES AND CONTROL AND SHUTOFF VALVES. 3. CEILING MOUNTED ELECTRICAL DEVICES SHALL BEAR UL LABEL AND FREE OF DEFECTS. 4. WHERE ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE IS SCHEDULED TO REMAIN, REPLACE DAMAGED ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH NEW TO MATCH EXISTING. IF PRODUCT IS NOT AVAILABLE FROM BUILDING INVENTORY ATTIC STOCK OR MANUFACTURER, NOTIFY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 5. LIGHTING CONTROL COVER PLATES SHALL BE WHITE AT GYP BD CEILINGS, SOFFITS AND CEILING MOUNTED FABRIC WRAPPED PANEL LOCATIONS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. AT EXPOSED STRUCTURE AREAS IN STEEL BUILDINGS WITH EXPOSED SPRAY FIREPROOFING, PROVIDE PROTECTIVE OVERSPRAY AT SPRAY- FIREPROOFING TO PREVENT DUSTING WHERE PAINT IS SCHEDULED AT EXPOSED CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE PRIMER/SEALER UNDERCOAT PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM DEVICE LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT. WHERE APPLICABLE CENTER SPRINKLER HEADS IN CEILING PANEL/TILE. ALIGN SPEAKERS, SMOKE DETECTORS, MOTION SENSORS AND RELATED CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES WITH LIGHTING FIXTURE CENTERLINES AND CENTER OF CEILING PANEL/TILE. LOCATE HVAC DIFFUSERS IN GYP BD CEILINGS AS SHOW ON ARCHITECTURAL R.C.P. 8. LOCATE EXIT SIGNS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR TO INSURE SIGHT LINES ARE NOT BLOCKED BY LIGHT FIXTURES, BEAMS, SOFFITS, DROPPED CEILINGS, DUCTWORK, CONDUIT BANKS, PIPING AND RELATED OVERHEAD WORK. 9. GYPSUM BOARD CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED [P-#], UON. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC PRODUCT. 10. ALL CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ARE AFF, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHEET NOTES Job No. Owner Approval Scale DELTA ISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"7/28/2023 10:29:28 PMPUTTSHACK SOUTHDALE 47PTTS.0001.000 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 2023 A.161A 3RD FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN - NORTH 22.7NORTH CAROLINA 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 TEL (704) 626-8732 © INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ENLARGED 3RD FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN - NORTH KEYNOTESLIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION 601 GC TO PROVIDE REMOTE J-BOX WITH PRIMARY POWER AND LABELED CAT5 DATA CABLE WITH LABELED RJ45 END. GC TO CUT ACCESS PANEL DURING SIGNAGE VENDORS INITIAL WALK-THROUGH; PANEL TO BE ABOVE DATUM LINE AND NOT IN WALLCOVERING. 602 GC TO PROVIDE POWER FOR PLUG-IN FIXTURE AND LABELED CAT5 DATA CABLE WITH LABELED RJ45 END. 603 GC TO PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR TVS (IN WALL WHERE APPLICABLE). 604 PERIMETER LIGHTING TO STOP AT COLUMNS, STAIRS, AND RAMPS AND CONTINUE ON OTHER SIDE. 606 GC TO PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR LIT SIGNAGE. REFER TO SHOPS FOR MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS. 607 TAPE LIGHTING TO BE LOCATED INSIDE MILLOWORK. SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN, MILLWORK SCHEDULE, AND MILLWORK SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION. 608 A24 TO BE AT FRONT AND ASSOCIATE SIDE OF BAR DIE. 609 A24 TO BE AT TIERED LEVELS OF THE MAIN BAR ISLAND AND SECONDARY BACK BAR SHELVING. 611 GC TO WORK WITH SIGNAGE MANUFACTURER TO ENSURE CLEAN INSTALLATION. PRE-WIRE MAY BE REQUIRED TO AVOID DAMAGE TO FINAL WALL FINISH. 612 PLUG-IN LIGHT FIXTURE TO BE TIED INTO DIMMING SYSTEM. SEE POWER AND DATA PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. 614 DJ BOOTH DIE WALL TO BE INTERNALLY LIT WITH LEDS, VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE THROUGH DECORATIVE HOLE PATTERN. COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH MILLWORK, ELECTRICIAN, AND LIGHTING MANUFACTURER. 616 J-BOX TO BE LOCATED AT THE BASE OF THE SCONCE. COORDINATED LOCATION WITH LIGHTING MANUFACTURER. 617 EXTERIOR LED LIGHT TO BE HIDDEN IN FRAME TO LIGHT EXTERIOR MURAL. 618 EXTERIOR FLOOR LIGHT TO BE BOLTED DOWN TO STRUCTURE. REFER TO SHEETS A.920, A.921, A.922, A.923 6 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 07.28.2023 P 2 2 WALL CR TSAT P 2 2 FLR JB EL EDR DR ML OS REX PB D DN DN DN DN MM MMJB30"48"30"48"B BB B MMMM WALL MOUNTED DUPLEX OUTLET WALL MOUNTED DEDICATED OUTLET WALL MOUNTED QUAD OUTLET FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED DUPLEX OUTLET FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED WIRED JUNCTION BOX WALL MOUNTED JUNCTION BOX FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED TELEPHONE OUTLET FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED DATA OUTLET FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED TELEPHONE/DATA OUTLET WALL MOUNTED TELEPHONE OUTLET WALL MOUNTED DATA OUTLET WALL MOUNTED TELEPHONE/DATA OUTLET WALL MOUNTED CARD READER WALL MOUNTED PUSH BUTTON WALL MOUNTED THERMOSTAT FLOOR WHIP - DATA/POWER WALL WHIP - DATA/POWER AV FLOOR MOUNTED JUNCTION BOX FLOOR MOUNTED QUAD OUTLET AV EQUIPMENT DESIGNATIONX FURNITURE MOUNTED DUPLEX OUTLET FURNITURE MOUNTED TELEPHONE/DATA OUTLET # OF TEL/DATA & POWER DROPS # OF TEL/DATA & POWER DROPS ELECTRIFIED LOCKSET & ELECTRIFIED HINGE EMERGENCY DOOR RELEASE PULL DOOR RELEASE BUTTON ELECTROMAGNETIC LOCK OCCUPANCY SENSOR RELEASE PUSH TO EXIT RELEASE BUTTON PANIC BUTTON POWER & SIGNAL LEGEND WALL MOUNTED SWITCH WALL MOUNTED DIMMER 1. SEE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. NOTIFY ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING THE WORK. 2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL FINAL FLOOR CORE LOCATIONS WITH FURNITURE VENDOR, OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO START OF WORK. FLOOR AND WALL CORING SHALL BE SCHEDULED DURING OFF HOURS UNLESS OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY OWNER. 3. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN EXISTING UL FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY FOR PENETRATIONS. 4. NEW COVER PLATES, STROBES, SWITCHES, AND PLUGS, ETC. TO BE WHITE AT PAINTED AND FABRIC WALL AREAS UON ALL COVER PLATES AT WOOD VENEER WALLS TO BE DARK BROWN UON. 5. REPLACE EXISTING COVER PLATES, PLUGS, SWITCHES, ETC. WITH NEW. 6. COORDINATE DEVICE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO START OF WORK INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SYSTEM FURNITURE LAYOUT, FREE STANDING AND BUILT-IN FURNITURE, MILLWORK , STRUCTURAL COLUMN LINES AT 'POKE-THROUGH' LOCATIONS & FACE OF FINISH AT PARTITIONS AND FLOOR. WHERE APPLICABLE CONDUCT PRE- INSTALLATION CONFERENCE. 7. WHERE 'WHIPS' ARE INDICATED FOR SYSTEM FURNITURE, PROVIDE COMPLETE CODE COMPLIANT INSTALLATION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO 'WHIP' MUST BE VISIBLE AND READILY ACCESSIBLE, SYSTEM FURNITURE 'WHIP' INSTALLATION, HOOK UP AND ACTIVATION SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL LABOR LAWS AND JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING UL., LOCATE 'WHIP' OUTSIDE CLEAR ZONES REQUIRED FOR CIRCULATION, ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AND EXIT PATH. 8. FURNITURE VENDOR SHALL COORDINATE FURNITURE INSTALLATION WITH POWER/SIGNAL DEVICE LOCATIONS. 9. PROVIDE 3” MINIMUM CLEAR BETWEEN FLOOR MONUMENTS AND PARTITION. 10. PROVIDE NEMA RECEPTACLE TYPES BASED ON ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS AS COORDINATED PRIOR TO START OF WORK 11. RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND OUTLET MOUNTING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ARE MEASURED FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO OUTLET CENTERLINE MOUNTED VERTICALLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PRIOR TO START OF WORK VERIFY AND COORDINATE ELECTRICAL BUS DUCT AND CONDUIT, RISER AND HORIZONTAL ROUTING, RUN LOCATIONS, CIRCUITING AND WIRING FOR NEW WORK TO VALIDATE REQUIRED CLEARANCES BASED ON AS- BUILT FIELD CONDITIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF CONFLICTS. 13. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITERS, THE STATE FIRE MARSHALL, THE SAFETY ORDERS OF THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND APPLICABLE CODES. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UL LABELED. 14. BUILDING SERVICES AND UTILITY DISRUPTIONS TO THE BUILDING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TENANTS IN MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS ARE NOT PERMITTED DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS AND SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY THE PROPERTY MANAGER 48 HOURS MINIMUM PRIOR TO THE DISTRUPTION (EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY THE PROPERTY MANAGER) IN ALL INSTANCES. ALL FIRE / LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL REMAIN OPERATIONAL DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. FOR TEMPORARY DISRUPTIONS LIMITED TO THE AREA OR WORK, AFTER HOURS AS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE WORK, SCHEDULE DAY AND TIME WITH OWNER IN ADVANCE, IN WRITING ON AN OVERTIME BASIS. REESTABLISH ALL BUILDING SERVICES AND UTILITIES AT CONCLUSION OF TEMPORARY SHUT OFF, AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. SHEET NOTES N.I.C MATCHLINE 1/A21A MATCHLINE 1/A21B MATCHLINE 1/A21A MATCHLINE 1/A21B WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP 210 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A B C D E F 207 206 205 208208 209 206 207 203 203 206 Job No. Owner Approval Scale DELTA ISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"7/28/2023 10:28:29 PMPUTTSHACK SOUTHDALE 47PTTS.0001.000 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 2023 A.121A 3RD FLOOR POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN-NORTH 22.7NORTH CAROLINA 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 TEL (704) 626-8732 KEYNOTES GC SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLES OF ALL WALL DEVICES (POWER/DATA/LIGHT SWITCHES) FOR ARCHITECTS SELECTION DARK GREY MEDIUM GREY LIGHT GREY BLACK EXAMPLE: PT-2, PT-5, WT-2, WD-1, WD-2, WD-5, WC-8, MTL-3 WHITE EXAMPLE: PT-1, PT-3, WC-1, PL-1, WT-1, WT-3, WT-5, FWP-1 DEVICE COLOR WALL FINISH DESIGNATION PER PLAN OUTLET/DEVICE/SWITCH AND COVER PLATE COLOR SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION 203 TELEVISION MILLWORK SURROUND, ON ALL TVS ABOVE. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND MILLWORK SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION. 205 LOCATION OF OF MIRROR. PROVIDE BLOCKING. REFER TO ELEVATIONS FOR DIMENSIONS. 206 LOCATION OF OF WALL ART. PROVIDE BLOCKING. REFER TO ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS. 207 DASHED LINE REPRESENTS MOTORIZED ROLLER SHADES. PROVIDE POWER AND BLOCKING AS REQUIRED. 208 LOCATION OF OFCI CHECK-IN KIOSKS. REFER TO ELEVATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 209 LOCATION OF CUSTOM EXTERIOR MURAL. OFOI. 210 REFER TO TRIMARK/KEC QF DRAWINGS FOR POWER AND DATA REQUIREMENTS AT KITCHEN, BACK BAR AND BEVERAGE STATION. PROVIDE GFCI RECEPTACLES AS REQUIRED BY CODE. 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN-NORTH © INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. 1 SD DELIVERABLE 04/07/20236 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 07.28.2023 DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN MM MMB BB B MMMM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A B C D E F N.I.C 24'-0"95'-6 3/4" CL1'-1 1/2"5'-10 1/2" LT-05 Z44 LT-51 Z58 LT-05 Z44 LT-51 Z58CL7'-5 1/4"CL7'-5 1/4"CLEQ.EQ. CL 1'-2 3/4"9'-2"9'-10" CL 2'-2" CL 1'-3"CLEQ.EQ.CL3'-5"CL3'-5"CL3'-5"CL EQ EQ CLCLCLEQ.EQ.1'-1"3'-5"CL2'-10" CL2'-6"CLEQ.EQ.CLEQEQCL1'-0"CL12'-3"9'-2"CL5'-6"TYP.±45°CLCLCLEQEQCLCLCLEQEQCLCLEQ.TYP.±45°CLCLCLCLEQ.EQEQCLCLCLCLCLEQEQEQEQBEGIN FESTOON LT. FROM CORNER CENTER FESTOON LT. ON COLUMN CENTER FESTOON LT. ON COLUMN CENTER FESTOON LT. ON COLUMN CENTER FESTOON LT. ON COLUMN BEGIN FESTOON LT. FROM CORNER BEGIN FESTOON LT. FROM CORNER BEGIN FESTOON LT. FROM CORNER CENTER FESTOON LT. ON COLUMN CENTER FESTOON LT. ON COLUMN T21-12 Z21 T21-16 Z46 T21-12 Z45 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z22 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-18 Z41 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-14 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-16 Z21 T21-16 Z21 T21-8 Z46 T21-14 Z41 T21-10 Z46 T21-8 Z46 T21-8 Z50 T21-6 Z46 S-14 T21-26 Z22 X-S0T21-12 Z22 T21-12 Z22 T21-20 Z21 T21-12 Z21 T21-24 Z22 T21-16 Z46 T21-16 Z44 T21-12 Z45 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z22 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-18 Z41 T21-12 Z46 T21-12 Z46 T21-8 Z46 T21-14 Z46 T21-16 Z21 T21-16 Z21 T21-14 Z22 T21-8 Z46 T21-10 Z46 T21-10 Z46 T21-8 Z45 T21-8 Z46 T21-12 Z1 T21-6 Z46 T21-6 Z91 S-14T21-6 Z21 S-14 Z21 T21-26 Z22 T21-12 Z22 T21-12 Z22 T21-8 T21-4 Z45 T21-4 Z45 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 LT-56 Z4 A47 Z87 A47 Z87 S-08A Z92 S-16B Z94 S-15A Z94 LT-01 ZX-1 LT-01 ZX-1 LT-01 ZX-1 LT-01 ZX-1 LT-01 ZX-1 LT-01 ZX-1 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-01 ZX-1 T21-46 Z22CLCLCL1'-0"6'-0"3'-0"T21-16 Z3 CLEQ EQ CLEQEQCL 6'-2"4 5 ° T21-12 Z2CL 8 1/2"CLEQEQ2'-6"T21-8 Z22 CLCL6'-2"8'-8"T21-28 Z21 T21-28 Z51 8'-0" 9'-8"CLCLCL6'-2"8'-8"1'-6"T21-10 Z22 T21-18 Z21 12'-0" T21-28 Z51 21'-2" T21-8 Z30 T21-20 Z21 CLCL CL 4'-0"3'-0"6'-7"2'-6" T21-8 Z19CL8'-3"T21-28 Z21 10'-8"T21-18 Z21 1'-11"CLCL9'-6"1'-2" S-14 Z41 CLCLCL1'-1 1/2"12'-0"12'-0"1'-1 1/2" CLCLCL 1'-1 1/2"12'-0"12'-0"1'-1 1/2"CLCLCL4'-1 1/2"EQ.EQ.T21-8 Z11 T21-8 Z11 T21-26 Z11 T21-26 Z11 CL6'-11 3/4" LT-03 Z24 LT-03 Z24 T21-18 Z21 T21-18 Z21 T21-8 Z22 T21-20 Z21 T21-20 Z21 3'-4"CLCLCL2'-6"2'-0"6'-1"T21-20 Z21 517 517 501 504 501 504 504 505504 505 507 507 504 506506 501 504 506 501 504 506 513 513513 513513513 509 506 S-14 1 1/2"4'-0"520 502 521521 TYP. A.400B 3 10'-7"TYP.CLCL3'-7"6'-10 1/4"1'-0 3/4"CL 7'-6 1/4" 9'-0" CL 10'-3" CL 8'-0"2'-5"CL 8'-6 1/4"1'-0 3/4"CL 11 3/4"2'-6 1/2"3'-4"11'-3"1'-10 1/2"5'-5"CL 7'-5" 2'-0" 15'-3"CL4'-5 1/2"1'-0"CL 5'-4"5'-0 1/2"11'-10 1/2"CL3'-7 1/2"7'-11"CL7'-2 1/4"CLCL7'-11 1/2"1'-3"2'-6 1/2" 11'-6" 19'-8" 3'-2 1/4" 3'-11 1/2"CLCL4'-1 1/2"4'-0 1/4"2'-7" CL4'-1 1/4"1'-1 1/2"8'-10 1/2"CL12'-9 1/4"5'-6 1/4" 6'-8" CL8 1/2"2'-6 1/2"1'-11 1/2"CL 13'-9 1/4" CL3'-1"1'-4"5'-10 3/4" 8'-0" 8'-4 1/4" 15'-1 3/4" 9'-0 1/2" 6'-1"4'-6 1/4"3'-7 3/4"CL4'-10 1/2"12'-0"1'-7 3/4"CL 4'-11 1/4" CL 2'-2 3/4"3'-8 1/4"8'-9 3/4" 4'-7 1/4" 9'-10 1/4" 11'-0 1/4" 9"12'-9 1/2"CL7'-5 1/2"4'-10 3/4"3'-0"8'-11 1/2"506 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z44 1'-5 1/4" 7'-2"1'-6" 10'-8 3/4" LT-05 Z44 LT-05 Z441'-10"CL11'-9"CLEQEQCLEQEQT21-8 Z52 T21-8 Z52 T21-8 Z52 T21-8 Z52 CL1'-5"CL1'-0"CL1'-0" 524524 525525 8' -6" A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 A28 (E) ELEVATOR 526 526 526 A51 Z20 A51 Z20 A51 Z20 CLCLCL2'-3"4'-6"CLCLCL 1'-8"1'-8" 1'-5" CEILING MOUNTED ONE SIDED EXIT SIGN CEILING MOUNTED TWO SIDED EXIT SIGN WALL MOUNTED EXIT SIGN LINEAR FLUORESCENT 2X4 FLUORESCENT TROFFER FIXTURE 2X2 FLUORESCENT TROFFER FIXTURE RECESSED DOWNLIGHT RECESSED SQUARE DOWNLIGHT RECESSED WALL WASHER CEILING MOUNTED PENDANT WALL MOUNTED SCONCE NEW TYP. CEILING GRID (WHITE - BOH) NEW GWB CEILING / SOFFIT LINEAR FLUORESCENT WALL WASHER CEILING MOUNTED SPECIALTY PENDANT CEILING MOUNTED WIRELESS NETWORK ROUTER SUSPENDED DIRECT/INDIRECT LINEAR FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE RECESSED FLUORESCENT LINEAR FIXTURE TRIMLESS AT GYP BD CEILING UNDER CABINET LED FIXTURE LED STRIP COVE LIGHTING STEM MOUNTED LED SPOT LIGHT RCP LEGEND EXISTING CEILING GRID EXISTING GWB CEILING / SOFFIT OPEN TO DECK NEW TYP. CEILING GRID (BLACK - FOH) A ZoneX LIGHT FIXTURE & ZONE TAG REFER TO LIGHTING SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1. VERIFY AS-BUILT FIELD CONDITIONS AND LOCATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW PLUMBING, AUDIO VISUAL, HVAC DUCTWORK AND PIPING, STRUCTURAL FRAMING, ELECTRICAL BUS DUCT AND CONDUIT BANKS, ELECTRICAL PULL BOXES, FIRE PROTECTION LINES AND RELATED WORK TO DETERMINE AND COORDINATE BEST CEILING FRAMING, POINTS OF ACCESS AND CLEARANCES AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK. 2. PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS WHERE REQUIRED IN GYP.BD. CEILING INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO FIRE SMOKE DAMPERS, FIRE LIFE SAFETY J-BOXES, FAN COILS AND VAV BOXES PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS, CONDUIT BANK PULL BOXES AND CONTROL AND SHUTOFF VALVES. 3. CEILING MOUNTED ELECTRICAL DEVICES SHALL BEAR UL LABEL AND FREE OF DEFECTS. 4. WHERE ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE IS SCHEDULED TO REMAIN, REPLACE DAMAGED ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE WITH NEW TO MATCH EXISTING. IF PRODUCT IS NOT AVAILABLE FROM BUILDING INVENTORY ATTIC STOCK OR MANUFACTURER, NOTIFY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 5. LIGHTING CONTROL COVER PLATES SHALL BE WHITE AT GYP BD CEILINGS, SOFFITS AND CEILING MOUNTED FABRIC WRAPPED PANEL LOCATIONS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. AT EXPOSED STRUCTURE AREAS IN STEEL BUILDINGS WITH EXPOSED SPRAY FIREPROOFING, PROVIDE PROTECTIVE OVERSPRAY AT SPRAY- FIREPROOFING TO PREVENT DUSTING WHERE PAINT IS SCHEDULED AT EXPOSED CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE PRIMER/SEALER UNDERCOAT PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM DEVICE LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT. WHERE APPLICABLE CENTER SPRINKLER HEADS IN CEILING PANEL/TILE. ALIGN SPEAKERS, SMOKE DETECTORS, MOTION SENSORS AND RELATED CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES WITH LIGHTING FIXTURE CENTERLINES AND CENTER OF CEILING PANEL/TILE. LOCATE HVAC DIFFUSERS IN GYP BD CEILINGS AS SHOW ON ARCHITECTURAL R.C.P. 8. LOCATE EXIT SIGNS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR TO INSURE SIGHT LINES ARE NOT BLOCKED BY LIGHT FIXTURES, BEAMS, SOFFITS, DROPPED CEILINGS, DUCTWORK, CONDUIT BANKS, PIPING AND RELATED OVERHEAD WORK. 9. GYPSUM BOARD CEILINGS TO BE PAINTED [P-#], UON. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC PRODUCT. 10. ALL CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ARE AFF, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHEET NOTES Job No. Owner Approval Scale DELTA ISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"7/28/2023 10:28:55 PMPUTTSHACK SOUTHDALE 47PTTS.0001.000 330 SOUTHDALE CENTER, EDINA, MN 55435 2023 A.152A 3RD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - NORTH 22.7NORTH CAROLINA 615 S COLLEGE ST, SUITE 725 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 TEL (704) 626-8732 © INTERIOR ARCHITECTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF THE ARCHITECT, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. 1/8" = 1'-0"1 3RD FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - NORTH KEYNOTES NO.DESCRIPTION 501 GC TO PROVIDE REMOTE J-BOX WITH PRIMARY POWER AND LABELED CAT5 DATA CABLE WITH LABELED RJ45 END. GC TO CUT ACCESS PANEL DURING SIGNAGE VENDORS INITIAL WALK-THROUGH; PANEL TO BE ABOVE DATUM LINE AND NOT IN WALLCOVERING. 502 NO FLY ZONE OVER BAR GANTRY 504 PROVIDE UNISTRUT AS NEEDED FOR CEILING HUNG TVS. LIGHTING, SIGNAGE AND BAR GANTRY. UNISTRUT TO BE THOUGHTFULLY PLACED BETWEEN TRUSSES, BEAMS AND HVAC. REFER TO AV/LV DRAWINGS FOR TV UNISTRUT MOUNTING HEIGHTS. 505 S-17 DOES NOT NEED ADDITIONAL POWER, TYP. THIS IS A VINYL STICKER AT LT-05 506 PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED IN CEILING FOR CEILING MOUNTED SIGNAGE , TVS AND LIGHTING. 507 NO FLY ZONE FROM BALL COLLECT TO BALL LIFTER. 509 PUCK LIGHT TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN MILLWORK GANTRY ABOVE. SEE MILLWORK DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 513 STRING LIGHTING TO CLIP TO BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS USING S-HOOKS OR CLAMPS. COORDINATE ATTACHMENT DETAIL WITH LANDLORD AND LANDLORD'S GC. 517 DASHED LINE REPRESENTS OFOI MOTORIZED ROLLER SHADES. PROVIDE POWER AND BLOCKING AS REQUIRED. 520 FIXTURE A24 LOCATED AT TIERED LIQUOR SHELVING, LOCATED ON COUNTERTOP. 521 FIXTURE A24 LOCATED AT GUEST FACING BAR DIE AS WELL AS BARTENDER FACING BAR DIE. 524 TRACK TO BE MOUNTED 9'-6" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OF LANDING TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURE. 525 TRACK TO BE MOUNTED 10'-0" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OF LANDING TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURE. 526 EXISTING LIGHTING IN EXISTING STAIR TO BE INVESTIGATED FOR ILLUMINATION COMPLIANCE AND UPGRADED AS REQUIRED. LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE NO.DESCRIPTION 501 GC TO PROVIDE REMOTE J-BOX WITH PRIMARY POWER AND LABELED CAT5 DATA CABLE WITH LABELED RJ45 END. GC TO CUT ACCESS PANEL DURING SIGNAGE VENDORS INITIAL WALK-THROUGH; PANEL TO BE ABOVE DATUM LINE AND NOT IN WALLCOVERING. 502 NO FLY ZONE OVER BAR GANTRY 504 PROVIDE UNISTRUT AS NEEDED FOR CEILING HUNG TVS. LIGHTING, SIGNAGE AND BAR GANTRY. UNISTRUT TO BE THOUGHTFULLY PLACED BETWEEN TRUSSES, BEAMS AND HVAC. REFER TO AV/LV DRAWINGS FOR TV UNISTRUT MOUNTING HEIGHTS. 505 S-17 DOES NOT NEED ADDITIONAL POWER, TYP. THIS IS A VINYL STICKER AT LT-05 506 PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED IN CEILING FOR CEILING MOUNTED SIGNAGE , TVS AND LIGHTING. 507 NO FLY ZONE FROM BALL COLLECT TO BALL LIFTER. 509 PUCK LIGHT TO BE MOUNTED WITHIN MILLWORK GANTRY ABOVE. SEE MILLWORK DETAILS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 513 STRING LIGHTING TO CLIP TO BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS USING S-HOOKS OR CLAMPS. COORDINATE ATTACHMENT DETAIL WITH LANDLORD AND LANDLORD'S GC. 517 DASHED LINE REPRESENTS OFOI MOTORIZED ROLLER SHADES. PROVIDE POWER AND BLOCKING AS REQUIRED. 520 FIXTURE A24 LOCATED AT TIERED LIQUOR SHELVING, LOCATED ON COUNTERTOP. 521 FIXTURE A24 LOCATED AT GUEST FACING BAR DIE AS WELL AS BARTENDER FACING BAR DIE. 524 TRACK TO BE MOUNTED 9'-6" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OF LANDING TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURE. 525 TRACK TO BE MOUNTED 10'-0" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OF LANDING TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURE. 526 EXISTING LIGHTING IN EXISTING STAIR TO BE INVESTIGATED FOR ILLUMINATION COMPLIANCE AND UPGRADED AS REQUIRED. REFER TO SHEETS A.920, A.921, A.922, A.923 6 CITY REVIEW - 30% 02/14/2023 7 CITY REVIEW - 60% 05/17/2023 8 CITY REVIEW - 90% 06/21/2023 9 ISSUE FOR PERMIT 07/28/2023 07.28.2023 9/22/23, 8:42 AM Edina, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank 1/5 (1) (2) (1) (2) DIVISION 5. - NOISES DISTURBING THE PUBLIC PEACE Sec. 23-121. - State pollution control agency. Noise pollution control regulations of the state pollution control agency air quality division published as Minnesota Rules ch. 7030 (2003) are hereby incorporated by reference. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.01(1); Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29- 1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21-2012) Sec. 23-122. - Measurement of acceptable sound levels. Minnesota Rules § 7030.060, the regulations adopted in section 23-121, is amended to read as follows: A measurement procedure approved by the sanitarian shall be used to determine the acceptability of sound levels in a given area. Such measurements shall be made using the following guidelines: If the noise emanates from a place other than a building or structure, then the measurement shall be made at the point of human activity in the receiving area which is the nearest the noise source and which is typical for the noise area classification category of the receiving area, except where existing barriers, obstructions or reflecting surfaces prevent an accurate measurement; and If the noise emanates from a building or structure, then the measurement shall be made from the property line of the property on which the building or structure is situated. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.01(2); Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29- 1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21-2012) Sec. 23-123. - Prohibited noise. No person shall make, continue, or cause or allow to be made or continued, any noise which exceeds the standards set forth in the regulations. The prohibition set forth in this section shall not apply to the following conditions: Noises necessary for the protection or preservation of property or of the health, safety, life or limb of a human being; The operation of motor vehicles on public streets, locomotives and railroad cars, maintenance of rights-of-way, utility easements or parks or snow removal by the city, county or state. 9/22/23, 8:42 AM Edina, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank 2/5 (a) (1) (2) a. b. c. (3) (b) (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.03; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) Sec. 23-124. - Hourly restrictions on certain operations. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.: Operate a snowmobile, minibike, all-terrain vehicle, or other vehicle not licensed for travel on public streets; provided vehicles used by physically disabled persons as defined by Minn. Stats. § 169.345, subd. 2, are exempt from this requirement; Operate a power lawn mower, power hedge clipper, power leaf blower, chain saw mulcher, garden tiller, edger, drill or other similar maintenance equipment; provided, however, the use of the following are exempt from this requirement: Fairway and greens mowers and other motorized equipment used to maintain golf courses and publicly owned property; Snow removal equipment; and Ice rink maintenance equipment. Collect garbage or refuse within 200 feet of a building used for residential purposes. No person shall engage in or permit construction and repair activities involving the use of any kind of electric, diesel or gas-powered motor vehicles or machine or other power equipment, audible beyond the property line of the property where the activity is occurring, except: For projects requiring a building permit with a building project value of $50,000.00 or less: Monday—Friday, 7:00 a.m.—7:00 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays (New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas), 9:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m. For projects requiring a building permit with a building project value of more than $50,000.00: Monday—Friday, 7:00 a.m.—7:00 p.m. Saturdays, 9:00 a.m.—5:00 p.m. Sundays and Holidays (New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas), no work (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.03; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012; Ord. No. 2020-11 , § 1, 8-18-2020) Sec. 23-125. - Advertising noises. 9/22/23, 8:42 AM Edina, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank 3/5 (a) (1) (2) (b) No person shall make or cause to be made for the purpose of advertising or announcing the person's vocation or presence, or in connection with the buying or selling of any goods, wares, merchandise, services or anything whatsoever, or with the carrying on of any trade, occupation, vocation or profit-making activity: An amplification of the voice; or Any bell, gong, horn, instrument, article or device. The violation of subsection (a) of this section in connection with any license or permit shall be cause for its revocation or suspension pursuant to article II of chapter 12. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.05; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) Sec. 23-126. - Engines to be mu ed. It shall be unlawful to operate or cause to be operated any noise-creating blower or power fan, internal combustion engine, air compressor or steam engine, the operation of which causes noises due to the explosion of operating gases of fluids, unless the noise from such blower or fan is muffled and such engine or compressor is equipped with a muffler device sufficient to deaden such noises, so that the noise shall not cause annoyance to the public or disturb the rest and quiet of persons of normal sensibilities in the vicinity. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.06; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) Sec. 23-127. - Mechanical sound devices. No person shall make, cause or allow to be made or continued, any unreasonably loud or raucous noise, in the operation or use of any radio, phonograph or other mechanical, pneumatic or electrical sound- making or reproducing device, instrument or machine, which disturbs the comfort, quiet or repose of persons of normal sensibilities in the vicinity. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.07; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) Sec. 23-128. - Alarm systems. 9/22/23, 8:42 AM Edina, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank 4/5 (a) (1) (2) (3) (b) (1) (2) (c) No person shall permit an automatic fire alarm or intrusion alarm system under the person's control to emit, for period exceeding 20 minutes, an audible alarm which disturbs the comfort, quiet or repose of persons of normal sensibilities in the vicinity. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.08; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) State Law reference— False fire alarms, Minn. Stats. § 609.686. Sec. 23-129. - Permit necessary for loudspeakers and similar devices. No person shall use or operate, or cause or allow to be used or operated, in any public street or place, or from any aircraft, or in front of or outside of any building, place or premises, or in or through any window, doorway or opening of such building, place or premises, abutting on or adjacent to any public street or place the following: Any device, apparatus or instrument for the amplification of the human voice; Any other sound or noise; or Any other sound-making or sound-reproducing devices; without obtaining a permit from the city. An application for a permit shall be made to the clerk on forms provided by the clerk. The provisions of article II of chapter 12 shall apply to permits issued under this subsection and to the holders of such permits. The application shall require, among other information required by article II of chapter 12: The hours and location of the proposed use; and The maximum volume (in decibels) of the proposed use. If the proposed use complies with the provisions of this division and other applicable provisions of this Code, the permit shall be granted. The fee for such permit shall be set forth in section 2- 724. Subsequent violation of any provision of this division or this Code by the permit holder shall be cause for revocation or suspension of the permit pursuant to article II of chapter 12. This subsection shall not apply to emergency vehicles or loudspeakers and similar devices used by the city. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.09; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) Sec. 23-130. - Participants as violators. 9/22/23, 8:42 AM Edina, MN Code of Ordinances about:blank 5/5 Any person on the premises or at the place from which any noise emanates which violates the provisions of this division, and who is participating in the activity for which or from which the noise is being made, shall be deemed to be making, or allowing to be made, the noise in violation of this division. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1040.10; Ord. No. 1032; Ord. No. 1032-A1, 8-12-1981; Ord. No. 1032-A2, 9-29-1982; Ord. No. 1032-A3, 9-10-1984; Ord. No. 1995-6, 8-17-1995; Ord. No. 2007-10, 6-5-2007; Ord. No. 2012-8, 2-21- 2012) Sec. 36-1260. - Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0.5 footcandle measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and one footcandle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.07(10); Ord. No. 2014-18 , § 5, 11-18-2014) 5 3 7 . 9 4 f t .1043.27 ft.831.74 f t . 0 ft. Total: 831.74 ft. 2080.02 f t . 1253.68 ft. Proximity to Residential Uses Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, © WSB & Associates 2013 September 19, 2023 0 375 750187.5 ft 0 110 22055 m 1:2,726 From: Barker, Brendan Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 1:32 PM To: Emily Bodeker <EBodeker@EdinaMN.gov>; Kris Aaker <KAaker@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov>; Liz Olson <LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov>; Straits, Paul < Subject: RE: Puttshack Southdale | Review Comments Hi Emily, Please reference my responses below in blue. Thanks, Brendan Barker P.E. Project Developer ARCO/Murray 331-290-5478 www.arcomurray.com From: Emily Bodeker <EBodeker@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 11:57 AM To: Barker, Brendan <bbarker@arcomurray.com>; Kris Aaker <KAaker@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov>; Liz Olson <LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov>; Straits, Paul Subject: RE: Puttshack Southdale | Review Comments Brendan, Yes, they were dropped off this morning. We also received the check in the mail. I looked at the submittal and have a few questions and would like a few more details. Please provide additional information or plans answering the questions below. Do you have plans for the rooftop? Are there tables? How many seats? landscaping? Fencing? Rooftop plans for the terrace are shown on page A.111A which we included. Yes, there are tables and there are a total of 153 seats. There is no fencing, entire patio is already enclosed by the existing building. No landscaping. Also attached is a plan which shows patio seating A.121A. Will the rooftop have food and drink service? Yes it will. Food and drinks will be served from the inside of the space. Will the rooftop have speakers for music? Lighting? Yes there will be speakers on the patio for music, yes we do have lighting please see attached lighting plan and reflected ceiling plan showing festoon lights. What are the hours of operation? Will the rooftop have the same hours of operation? See below table. Hours of operation for patio and rest of space are consistent. Sunday 11 AM–12 AM Monday 11 AM–12 AM Tuesday 11 AM–12 AM Wednesday 11 AM–12 AM Thursday 11 AM–1 AM Friday 11 AM–1 AM Saturday 11 AM–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ate: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-66: Approving a Site Plan at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road for Minnesota Made Hockey Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-66 approving a Site P lan at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road for Minnesota Made Hockey. INTRODUCTION: Invicta Group, LLC (known as Minnesota Made Hockey), is proposing to construct a new 10,240 square foot training facility on the southern portion of the lot at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road. The parcel is 5.55 acres and currently has a 63,311 square foot structure containing two ice rinks and assorted support spaces that would remain. The proposed building is 64’ x 160’ and would include a turf area, weight training, and other hockey specific training space. Minnesota Made Hockey currently operates a training facility as a tenant in the building located at 7101 Amundson Ave. The purpose of the new building is to move those operations to the new facility. The new structure would replace an outdoor ice rink that was added in 2013. T he site is zoned Planned Industrial District, which allows for athletic facilities as a permitted use. To accommodate the request, site plan approval is required. Since the October 3, 2023, City Council meeting, the applicant has voluntarily submitted the Sustainability Questionnaire, which is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report - September 13, 2023 Applicant Narrative Traffic Study Plans 1 of 2 Plans 2 of 2 Storm Water Info (1 of 2) Storm Water Info (2 of 2) Geotechnical Report Review Memo - Engineering Review Memo - Transportation Better Together Public Input Report Staff Presentation Resolution No. 2023-66 Better Together Public Input Report Sustainability Questionnaire Invicta, LLC (known as Minnesota Made Hockey), is proposing to construct a new 10,240 square foot training facility on the southern portion of the parcel at 7300 West Bush Lake Road. The parcel is 5.55 acres and currently has a 63,311 square foot structure containing two ice rinks and assorted support spaces that would remain. The proposed building is 64’ x 160’ and would include a turf area, weight training, and other hockey specific training space. Minnesota Made Hockey currently operates a training facility as a tenant in the building located at 7101 Amundson Avenue. The purpose of the new building is to move those operations to the new facility. The new structure would replace an outdoor ice rink that was added in 2013. The site is zoned Planned Industrial District, which allows for athletic facilities as a permitted use. To accommodate the request, site plan approval is required. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Self-storage facility; zoned Planned Industrial District and guided Industrial Easterly: Church; zoned Planned Industrial District and guided Industrial Southerly: Post Office; zoned Planned Industrial District and guided Industrial Westerly: Industrial building; zoned Planned Industrial and guided Industrial Existing Site Features The subject property has an existing 63,311 sq. ft. building containing two ice rinks. An outdoor ice rink is located where the new building is proposed. The site also contains a surface parking lot. September 13, 2023 Planning Commission Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Site Plan Review – 7250-7300 West Bush Lake Road Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Industrial Zoning: PID, Planned Industrial District Site Circulation/Traffic Vehicle access to the site is from Bush Lake Road. There are two existing driveway entrances that would remain. One new driveway entrance is proposed. The traffic study performed for this project estimates that 125 daily trips will be added, including 27 during the a.m. peak hour and 52 during the p.m. peak hour. The added trips are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations. The study analyzed five nearby intersections that all currently operate at Level of Service A and are expected to continue operating at Level of Service A through the 2025 Build and No Build scenarios. No improvements are needed to accommodate the additional traffic. (See attached parking study.) An 8’ boulevard style-sidewalk is proposed to be installed along the property to improve pedestrian access. Three Rivers Park District’s proposed CP Rail Regional Trail will be south of the site at Dewey Hill Road. A construction date for the trail has not yet been determined as funding is still in the process of being secured. As that project progresses, the City of Edina will be involved in reviewing the design and will advocate for pedestrian safety improvements at this intersection. This site is served by Metro Transit Local Routes 6 and 540, which provide access to Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis. Both routes have stops located at the intersection of Dewey Hill Rd and Bush Lake Rd, less than a tenth of a mile away from the site. Parking City Code Section 36-1311 requires at least one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. The total square footage of the existing building plus the proposed building is 73,551. Therefore, a total of 184 vehicle stalls is required. The existing facility has 219 parking stalls. The proposed project would add 31 stalls, bringing the total to 242 stalls, exceeding the number required by City Code. City Code Section 36-1274 requires that the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. Therefore, 10 bicycle spaces are required. Code says that whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. Final design and placement is subject to approval of the City Engineer. Landscaping Based on the size of the site, 58 overstory trees are required. There are 36 existing trees, and none are proposed to be removed. The applicant is proposing to plant an additional 24 overstory trees for a total of 60. A full complement of understory trees and shrubs will also be STAFF REPORT Page 3 provided. Prior to building permit issuance, a landscape plan will need to be approved by the City Forester to verify specific size requirements. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable. (See attached engineering review memo.) Building/Building Material The proposed building exterior will be constructed of precast concrete wall panels on the three non-street-facing sides and a steel deck roof structure. The panels will be treated with a sandblast finish. The street-facing façade will be composed of brick on metal stud and glass. The panel and brick colors will be similar to the adjacent existing building. Mechanical Equipment/Trash Enclosures City Code Sec. 36-1457 requires the screening of mechanical equipment accessory to the building as well as trash storage facilities. 36-1459 says that “required screening may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges and other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building.” Rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened by corrugated metal panel. Trash containers are proposed to be stored inside the building on non-pickup days. Compliance Table PID Proposed Setbacks - Buildings Bush Lake Rd - Front North lot line – Side South lot line – Side West lot line – Rear 50 feet 28 feet 28 feet 28 feet 116 feet 9 inches Over 400 feet 60 feet 4 inches 63 feet 3 inches Building Height 4 stories and 48 feet per the height overlay district 1 story / 28 feet Parking lot and drive aisle setback East lot line South lot line West lot line North lot line Separation between the building and parking lot 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 28 feet 12 feet 63 feet Over 400 feet 10 feet (Applicant will adjust the plan to meet on south side) First Floor Height 20 feet 21 feet 6 inches 75% Transparency – 1st level 75% 75% STAFF REPORT Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend the City Council approve the Site Plan request based on the following findings: 1. The proposed site plan is in compliance with City Code. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Plan must be consistent with the Plans included in the September 13, 2023 Planning Commission packet. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment and ground level equipment must be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 8. Separation between the building and parking lot must be at least 10 feet. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the engineering and transportation memos dated September 6 & 7, 2023. 10. Any signage shall comply with the regulations of Article XIII in Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. Deadline for a city decision: October 9, 2023 Maximum Building Coverage 45% 30% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.5 0.3 Invicta Training Center Narrative 7-31-23 CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SRa Invicta Training Center 7300 West Bush Lake Road Edina, MN 55439 ARCIIITIKECRE ¨ INTERIORS Project Team Owner: Architect: Invicta, LLC Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. 7300 West Bush Lake Road 6442 City West Parkway - #300 Edina, MN 55439 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Bernie McBain Contact: Nick Sperides Phone: 612-819-5550 Phone: 952-996-9662 Email: bernie@mnmadehockey.corn Email: nick@sra-mn.com Summary Parcel Basics The existing 5.55-acre site at 7300 West Bush Lake Road is currently developed with a 63,311 s.f. structure with 2 ice rinks and assorted support spaces for operation of the facility known as Minnesota Made Hockey. Since 2007 this facility has been owned and operated as an ice hockey training center serving the metro area hockey community year-round. An outdoor ice rink was added in 2013 on the open land on the southernmost portion of the site. Project land use data The project site is currently zoned PID (Planned Industrial District). The facility has 219 parking spaces to serve the 63,311 s.f. building. The Owner wishes to construct a 10,240 s.f. training facility on the southern portion of the parcel. (This facility will not have an ice rink) The existing outdoor ice rink shall be removed from the site to allow for this development. The attached site plan shows 31 additional parking spaces. The newly created parcel will allow the Owner to obtain separate financing for the development under a separate business entity, thus avoiding the refinancing of the entire existing facility. The newly created parcel shall have a shared cross access agreement to allow for shared parking and site access/traffic flow. Building Program MN Made Hockey currently operates a training facility as a tenant in the building located at 7101 Amundson Ave, Edina, MN. This new structure will replace this facility under the business name of Invicta. The program for the 64' x 160' building will include a 20' x 158' turf area, weight training, hockey specific workout area for skating treadmill and stickhandling area as well as a shooting zone. Additionally support spaces such as locker rooms/restrooms, offices and building support rooms will be included. VNI03 d0 AllO 11\19INIEIVd30 ONINNVid Photo of existing MN Made Hockey arena at 7300 West Bush Lake Rd. Location of proposed building Building Design The proposed building exterior will be constructed of precast concrete wall panels on the three non-street- facing sides and a steel deck roof structure. The panels will be treated with a sandblast finish. The street-facing façade will be composed of brick on metal stud and glass in compliance with city code. Both panel and brick colors to be similar to the adjacent existing building. The site will be landscaped compliant with city code and stormwater management will be designed to be compliant with current regulations. File #193806423 August 29, 2023 DRAFT Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for the Invicta Training Center in Edina, MN August 2023 i DRAFT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-5 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-3 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ........................................ 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ......................................... 4-4 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: August 29, 2023 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 August 2023 1-1 DRAFT 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed Invicta Training Center located at 7300 Bush Lake Road in Edina, MN. The proposed project location is currently vacant space adjacent to the Minnesota Made Hockey facility. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road • W. 74th Street/Bush Lake Road • W. 74th Street/Metro Boulevard • Dewey Hill Road/Bush Lake Road • Bush Lake Road/Edina Industrial Boulevard The proposed project will involve construction of a new 10,240 square foot building for a hockey training facility. The project is expected to include 31 parking stalls. As shown in the site plan, one new access point is provided on Bush Lake Road. The existing Minnesota Made facility has two access points on Bush Lake Road north of the proposed access. The project is expected to be completed in 2025. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 27 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 52 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 125 trips daily. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, for the Ice Rink and Athletic Club land uses most closely match the existing and proposed facilities. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for both facilities is 116 spaces. The total of 242 spaces provided is 126 spaces greater than the peak demand. Edina City code requires one space per 400 square feet of building space. This equates to 26 spaces for the proposed facility. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Dewey Hill Road and W. 74th Street and new secondary sidewalk on Bush Lake Road. Future plans for this area also include standard bike lanes on Bush Lake Road. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use. Outside racks for short-term parking are recommended for employees and facility users. August 2023 1-2 DRAFT • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. August 2023 2-1 DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed Invicta Training Center located at 7300 Bush Lake Road in Edina, MN. The proposed project location is currently vacant space adjacent to the Minnesota Made Hockey facility. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road • W. 74th Street/Bush Lake Road • W. 74th Street/Metro Boulevard • Dewey Hill Road/Bush Lake Road • Bush Lake Road/Edina Industrial Boulevard Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve construction of a new 10,240 square foot building for a hockey training facility. The project is expected to include 31 parking stalls. As shown in the site plan, one new access point is provided on Bush Lake Road. The existing Minnesota Made facility has two access points on Bush Lake Road north of the proposed access. The project is expected to be completed in 2025. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. August 2023 2-2 DRAFT August 2023 2-3 DRAFT August 2023 3-1 DRAFT 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed project location is currently vacant space adjacent to the Minnesota Made Hockey facility. The site is bounded by Bush Lake Road on the east and commercial uses on the west, north, and south. Near the site location, Bush Lake Road, Dewey Hill Road, and Cahill Road are two lane undivided roadways. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. The westbound approach splits into a north and south approach, with each approach providing left turn/right turn lane. The eastbound approach provides a left turn lane and a right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide a left turn/through/right turn lane. Eastbound and westbound through movements must turn onto Cahill Road and back onto Dewey Hill Road to continue through. Dewey Hill Road/Bush Lake Road This three-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and southbound approaches. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. W. 74th Street/Bush Lake Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound approach. The westbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. W. 74th Street/Metro Boulevard This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. Bush Lake Road/Edina Industrial Boulevard This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the northbound and southbound approaches. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and right turn lane. August 2023 3-2 DRAFT Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at the existing intersections in July, 2023. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. August 2023 3-3 DRAFT August 2023 4-1 DRAFT 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2025. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2023 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2025 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2025 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth due to additional development in the area. • 2025 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2025 No-Build volumes to determine 2025 Build volumes. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed development were calculated based on detailed facility user information provided by the project owner. This information indicated a maximum of 20 facility users and 5 employees on-site at one time. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Facility users 20 people 20 0 20 20 20 40 100 Employees 5 people 5 0 5 5 5 10 15 Deliveries 1 1 2 1 1 2 10 Total trips 26 1 27 26 26 52 125 As shown, the project adds 27 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 52 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 125 trips daily. Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. August 2023 4-2 DRAFT The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 10 percent to/from the north on Cahill Road • 10 percent to/from the west on Dewey Hill Road • 10 percent to/from the south on Cahill Road • 20 percent to/from the south on Edina Industrial Boulevard • 20 percent to/from the east on Edina Industrial Boulevard • 10 percent to/from the south on Metro Boulevard • 20 percent to/from the north of Metro Boulevard Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. August 2023 4-3 DRAFT August 2023 4-4 DRAFT August 2023 5-5 DRAFT 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. August 2023 5-6 DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are discussed below. 2023 Existing Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road EB/WB stop A/A A/B Dewey Hill Road/Bush Lake Road EB/SB stop A/A A/A W. 74th Street/Bush Lake Road WB stop A/A A/A W. 74th Street/Metro Boulevard EB stop A/A A/A Bush Lake Rd/Edina Industrial Blvd NB/SB stop A/C A/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and movements operate at LOS C or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and movements operate at LOS E or better. 2025 No Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road EB/WB stop A/A A/B Dewey Hill Road/Bush Lake Road EB/SB stop A/A A/A W. 74th Street/Bush Lake Road WB stop A/A A/A W. 74th Street/Metro Boulevard EB stop A/A A/A Bush Lake Rd/Edina Industrial Blvd NB/SB stop A/C A/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and movements operate at LOS C or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and movements operate at LOS E or better. 2025 Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road EB/WB stop A/A A/B Dewey Hill Road/Bush Lake Road EB/SB stop A/A A/A W. 74th Street/Bush Lake Road WB stop A/A A/A W. 74th Street/Metro Boulevard EB stop A/A A/A Bush Lake Rd/Edina Industrial Blvd NB/SB stop A/C A/E Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and movements operate at LOS C or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and movements operate at LOS E or better. August 2023 5-7 DRAFT Overall Traffic Impact The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on the west side of Cahill Road and the south side of W. 74th Street. No sidewalk is provided on Bush Lake Road or Dewey Hill Road. Striped bike lanes are provided on Cahill Road. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Dewey Hill Road and W. 74th Street and new secondary sidewalk on Bush Lake Road. Future plans for this area also include standard bike lanes on Bush Lake Road. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use. Outside racks for short-term parking are recommended for employees and facility users. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus routes 6 and 540. Bus stops exist on Dewey Hill Road and W. 74th Street. Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. • Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. August 2023 6-1 DRAFT 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project is expected to include 31 parking stalls. The existing Minnesota Made Hockey facility has 219 parking stalls. The project description states that the new parcel will have a shared cross access agreement for shared parking and site access. Therefore, there will be a total of 242 parking stalls available for users of both facilities. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed and existing land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, for the Ice Rink and Athletic Club land uses most closely match the existing and proposed facilities. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for both facilities is 116 spaces. The total of 242 spaces provided is 126 spaces greater than the peak demand. The proposed number of parking stalls adequately accommodates the peak parking demand. Edina City code requires one space per 400 square feet of building space. This equates to 26 spaces. The 31 spaces provided is 5 spaces greater than the City code requirement. August 2023 7-1 DRAFT 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 27 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 52 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 125 trips daily. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, for the Ice Rink and Athletic Club land uses most closely match the existing and proposed facilities. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for both facilities is 116 spaces. The total of 242 spaces provided is 126 spaces greater than the peak demand. Edina City code requires one space per 400 square feet of building space. This equates to 26 spaces for the proposed facility. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Dewey Hill Road and W. 74th Street and new secondary sidewalk on Bush Lake Road. Future plans for this area also include standard bike lanes on Bush Lake Road. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use. Outside racks for short-term parking are recommended for employees and facility users. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. August 2023 8-1 DRAFT 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets LOCATION MAP ELECTRICAL OWNER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ARCHITECT OF RECORD CIVIL ENGINEER MECHANICAL PLUMBING PROJECT TEAM DESIGN/BUILDER MINNESOTA MADE HOCKEY 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 BERNIE MCBAIN 952-746-9033 BERNIE@MNMADEHOCKEY.COM COPELAND BUILDING CORP. 7625 METRO BEOULEVARD SUITE 300 EDINA, MN 55439 ROB COPELAND 952-832-5302 ROB@COPELANDBUILDING.COM SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITW #300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PROJECT CONTACT NICK SPERIDES 952-996-9662 NICK@SRA-MN.COM DESIGN BUILD DESIGN BUILD BKBM ENGINEERS 6120 EARLE BROWN DRIVE SUITE #700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55430 TINA WYFFELS 763-843-0436 TWYFFELS@BKBM.COM BKBM ENGINEERS 6120 EARLE BROWN DRIVE SUITE #700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55430 KEITH MATTE 763-843-0446 KMATTE@BKBM.COM GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN PROJECT IMAGE SHEET INDEX A. STUD FRAMING EXTENDED TO STRUCTURE ABOVE SHALL HAVE 3" X 3 5/8" GALVANIZED STUD TRACK AT TOP. STUD FRAMING SHALL BE 3/4" FROM TOP OF TRACK AND HAVE NO MECHANICAL FASTENING TO ALLOW FOR 3/4" DEFLECTION. B. VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS, AND ALIGNMENT OF WALLS. BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECTS ATTENTION PRIOR TO FABRICATION/ CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. C. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EQUIPMENT PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. D. HOLD 1/2" CLEARANCE BETWEEN FLOOR AND GYPSUM BOARD. FILL GAP BETWEEN BOTTOM EDGE OF GYPSUM BOARD AND FLOOR WITH SEALANT. STRIKE SEALANT SMOOTH AND FLUSH WITH FACE OF PARTITION. REMOVE EXCESS SEALANT FROM PARTITION AND FLOOR. E. CHANGES IN FLOOR MATERIALS SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF OR AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR/ FINISH PLAN. F. VERIFY LOCATION OF ACCESS PANELS WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ACCESS TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ITEMS. G. SEAL PENETRATIONS IN FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES AND SMOKE BARRIERS TO MEET REQUIRED RATINGS. UTILIZE UL APPROVED METHODS. H. PROVIDE FIRE TREATED BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT ALL CABINETS, SHELVES, BUILT-INS, EQUIPMENT OR ACCESSORIES. COORDINATE WITH VENDOR DOCUMENTS WHERE SUCH CONDITIONS APPLY. I. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IF ELECTRICAL/ COMMUNICATION/ HVAC/ PLUMBING/ ITEMS DEPICTED CONFLICT WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS OR INDUSTRY STANDARDS. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION: NOTE: ALL DEVICES AND CONTROLS TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN A MAXIMUM OF 4" OF EACH OTHER HORIZONTALLY (NOT 16" O.C.) AND ALIGN THE BOTTOMS OF EACH ITEM. IN THE VERTICAL POSITION ALIGN THE ITEMS ON CENTERLINES. J. DURING CONSTRUCTION, AREA SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND ORDERLY. K. LIGHTING, EXIT LIGHTING INFORMATION, ELECTRICAL, DATA AND TELEPHONE INFORMATION SHOWN ARE FOR ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE COORDINATION OF ELECTRICAL ITEMS WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT AND SHALL OBTAIN THE NEEDED INFORMATION TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE AND WORKING INSTALLATION. L. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL CODES. M. PROVIDE GFI ELECTRICAL OUTLETS AT LOCATIONS REQUIRED BY CODE. EXISTING MN MADE BUILDING NEW BUILDING PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/11/2023 1:16:06 PM XXX XXX 21-054 A000Invicta Training CenterTITLE SHEET 7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439INVICTA TRAINING CENTER 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, MN 55439 SHEETSHEET NAME CITY SUBMITTAL - 08/11/2023ARCHITECTURAL A000 TITLE SHEET ● SURVEY C000 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY ● CIVIL C100 SELECTIVE SITE DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ● C200 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ● C300 UTILITY PLAN ● C400 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN ● C500 CIVIL DETAILS ● C501 CIVIL DETAILS ● C502 CIVIL DETAILS ● C600 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ● ARCHITECTURAL A001 ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS & TYPICAL MOUNTING HEIGHTS A002 SIGHTLINE STUDY A003 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS ● A010 LIFE SAFETY PLANS A020 BUILDING SYSTEMS A021 PARTITION TYPES A022 PARTITION TYPE DETAILS A030 ARCHITECTURAL DEMOLITION SITE PLAN A040 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ● A050 LANDSCAPE PLAN ● A100 DEMOLITION PLAN A200 FLOOR PLAN ● A220 FINISH PLAN, LEGEND, AND SCHEDULE A230 REFLECTED CEILING PLANS A240 ROOF PLAN A300 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A310 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COLOR ● A400 BUILDING SECTIONS A420 WALL SECTIONS A421 WALL SECTIONS A500 EXTERIOR DETAILS A520 ROOF DETAILS A600 SCHEDULES / FRAMES TYPES A700 CASEWORK SCHEDULE A701 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A710 INTERIOR SECTION & DETAILS A820 FURNITURE PLAN A900 AXONOMETRIC ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C00SE/ECTI9E SITEDEMO/ITION ANDEROSION CONTRO/P/AN PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C200GRADING,DRAINAGE, ANDEROSION CONTRO/P/AN PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C300UTI/ITY P/AN EXISTING MN MADE BUILDINGNEW BUILDINGPROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C400PA9ING ANDGEOMETRIC P/AN” ’ PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C500CI9I/ DETAI/S PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C50CI9I/ DETAI/S······ PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C502CI9I/ DETAI/S 121234PROJECT NO:WHGKD KAM2334.5IQYLFWD TUDLQLQJ CHQWHU 300 BUSH /AKE ROAD EDINA, MN 55439 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE 2023-0-CITY SUBMITTA/6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY SUITE 300 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PH: 952-996-9662 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2023 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PERMIT SETNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSRa ARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS BKBMENGINEERS 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com C 2023 BKBM EngineersAll rights reserved.This document is an instrument of service and is theproperty of BKBM Engineers and may not be usedor copied without prior written consent. BKBM JOB No. 23348.50REG NO: 6633 GRI))IN K. DEMPSEY I HEREBY CERTI)Y THAT THIS P/AN, SPECI)ICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPER9ISION AND THAT I AM A DU/Y /ICENSED PRO)ESSIONA/ ENGINEER UNDER THE /AWS O) THE STATE O) MINNESOTA. AUGUST , 2023C600STORM WATERPO//UTIONPRE9ENTION P/AN PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/11/2023 1:16:07 PM Author Checker 21-054 A003Invicta Training CenterEXTERIOR RENDERINGS 7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION ENTRY VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST ENTRY VIEW FROM NORTHEAST / EXISTING BUILDING STREET VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST STREET VIEW FROM NORTHEAST WALL EXISTING RAILROAD TRACKSBUSH LAKE ROAD31 NEW PARKING STALLS 63' - 3"160' - 0"7' - 6"21' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"20' - 3" TRAIL EASEMENT 8' - 0" PROPOSED BUILDING 10,240 SF 17 12 ACCESSENTRY40' - 0"64' - 0"6' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"12' - 4"EXISTING MN MADE BUILDING 2 15 EXIST TO REMAIN 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 40' - 0"64' - 0"60' - 4"63' - 3"276' - 9" A040 2 SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 1 BIKE RACK. 2 EXISTING LIGHT POLE. 3 ROOF ACCESS HATCH AND SHIP'S LADDER. 4 ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNIT & SCREENING. PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/11/2023 1:16:11 PM XXX XXX 21-054 A040Invicta Training CenterARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439NTN SCALE:1" = 20'-0"A040 2 SITE PLAN ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE:1" = 50'-0"A040 1 FULL SITE PLAN NTN BUSH LAKE ROADEXISTING MN MADE BUILDING AM 2 BS 1 RB 2 BS 2 AM 1 QB 7 QB 2 BS 3 BS 1 SJ 2 SJ 11 ID 2 KF 4 KF 3 KF 4 KF 4 SSD 7 SSD 7 KF 5 KF 3 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE 837.50 AM 2 BS 1 GGB 13 GGB 1 GGB 13 SOD/TOPSOIL - SEE NOTES MNDOT SEED MIX 35-241 MESIC PAIRIE SEEDING RATE: 36.5 LBS/ACRE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 STORMWATER / POND BOTTOM SEEDING RATE: 35 LBS/ACRE LANDSCAPE GEN. NOTES A. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. B. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPRISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. C. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. D. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. E. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' - 0" CLEARANCE). F. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. G. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF SAME. H. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/11/2023 1:16:15 PM XXX XXX 21-054 A050Invicta Training CenterLANDSCAPE PLAN7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE:1" = 20'-0"A050 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANT SCHEDULE ABBREVIATION QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE SPACING CONIFEROUS SHRUBS GGB 27 GREEN GEM BOXWOOD Buxus x 'Green Gem'5 GAL 18" SPRD 48" o.c. SJ 13 SCANDIA JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Scandia'5 GAL 18" SPRD 48" o.c. DECIDUOUS TREES AM 5 ARMSTRONG MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Armstrong'B&B 2.5" Cal QB 9 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor B&B 2.5" Cal RB 2 RIVER BIRCH CLUMP Betula nigra B&B - EVERGREEN TREES BS 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE FULL FORM Picea glauca 'Densata'B&B 6' HGT GRASSES KF 23 FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' 1 GAL 30" o.c. PERENNIALS SSD 14 STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY Hemerocallis x 'Stella Supreme'1 GAL 24" o.c. SHRUBS ID 2 ISANTI DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Isanti'5 GAL 24" HGT 72" o.c. 1" = 20'-0" LANDSCAPE LEGEND NTN FLOOR PLAN GEN. NOTES A. DRAWINGS SHOULD NOT BE SCALED - DIMENSIONS GOVERN, CONTACT ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION B. ALL PARTITIONS TO BE "TD5" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE C. SEE SHEET A020 FOR BUILDING SYSTEM INFORMATION D. SEE SHEET A021 FOR PARTITION TYP INFORMATION E. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY OR FACE OF GYP BD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE F. THE TYPICAL DIMENSION FROM OUTSIDE EDGE OF DOOR FRAME TO THE FACE OF ADJACENT PERPENDICULAR WALL IS 3" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE G. ALL WALLS TO DECK TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE DEFLECTION OF ROOF STRUCTURE H. PROVIDE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP BD AT ALL WET WALLS I. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN GYP BD AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER J. COORDINATE UNDERGROUND AND UNDER SLAB UTILITIES, COORDINATE ALL SLEEVES THROUGH / UNDER FOOTING AND FOUNDATION W/ STRUCTURAL ENGINEER K. PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF SIZE AND TYPE AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL L. VERIFY / COORDINATE LOCATION OF KNOX BOX WITH LOCAL FIRE MARSHALL (IF REQUIRED) M. REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL COMPONENT SIZES, LOCATIONS, CONFIGURATIONS, AND CAPACITIES N. STAIR SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FOR ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED O. SUBCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. ANY OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES, OR CONFLICTS MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY P. AT PENETRATIONS OCCURRING IN A FIRE-RATED ENCLOSURE, THE SPACE AROUND PENETRATION SHALL BE FIRE STOPPED TO MEET REQUIRED RATING FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES 1 ALIGN PARTITION WITH EXG WDW MULLION 1A30064' - 0"3 A3004A3002 A300 20' - 0"10' - 3"12' - 9"19' - 0"17' - 2 7/8"14' - 8"5' - 8" 5' - 8"14' - 8"7' - 8 1/2"8' - 11"9' - 1"8' - 11"8' - 11"8' - 9 3/8"6' - 8"4' - 8"4' - 0"8' - 8"7' - 6"7' - 6"9' - 0"15' - 7"8' - 5"20' - 0"6' - 0"SHOP 119 SKATING TREADMILL 118 SHOOTING AND STICK AREA 117 SHOOTING AND STICK AREA 116 VISION TRAINING 105 VESTIBULE 100 TOILET 107 TOILET 108 OFFICE 103 OFFICE 104 CONFERENCE ROOM 102TEAM DRESSING 110 TEAM DRESSING 111 SHOWER 114 SHOWER 115 TOILET 112 TOILET 113 STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING AREA 120 40 YARD DASH TURF AREA 121 OVERRUN 123 OVERRUN 122 MECHANICAL ROOM 109 1 A400 2 A400 3 A400 4 A400 LOBBY/WAITING 101 NETTING BETWEEN AREAS STANLEY SLIDING GLASS DOORS 1A3103 A3104A3102 A310 6' - 0"6' - 0" TD 5TD 5 TD 5 TD 5 TD 5 PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/11/2023 1:16:15 PM XXX XXX 21-054 A200Invicta Training CenterFLOOR PLAN 7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439N SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A200 1 LEVEL 1 ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION D REFLECTED CEILING PLAN GENERAL NOTES A. LIGHTING FIXTURES SHOWN FOR LOCATION ONLY AS THEY RELATE TO THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. SEE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND QUANTITIES. B. SWITCHING SHOWN TO DEMONSTRATE OWNER'S OPERATIONAL NEEDS ONLY. ALL CIRCUITS AND SWITCH CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. C. HVAC EQUIPMENT SHOWN FOR LOCATION ONLY AS THEY RELATE TO THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. SEE MECHANICAL FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND QUANTITIES. D. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY LIGHTING, SMOKE DETECTORS, & EXIT SIGNS AS REQUIRED BY CODE & A.D.A (AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT) E. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES. SALVAGE AND REUSE AS MANY LIGHT FIXTURES AS FEASIBLE. RCP KEYNOTES 1 EXPOSED TO EXG STRUCTURE ABOVE, PT-2 2 L5X3X1/4 STEEL ANGLE, ANGLES (IN ROOF DECK SPAN DIRECTION) TO SPAN BETWEEN TOP CHORD OF JOISTS. ANGLES (PERPENDICULAR) TO SPAN BETWEEN ANGLES. WELD ANGLES. ADD STIFFENERS TO JOISTS, SEE 7/A4 3 CURB MOUNTED UNIT SKYLIGHT, OWNER PROVIDED (ACRALIGHT SOLAR), CONTRACTOR INSTALLED. DETAIL: ACRYLIC PLASTIC-GLAZING, DOUBLE DOME, THERMALLY-BROKEN FRAME. SIZE: 48”X 48”ROUGH OPENING. FRAME FINISH: CLEAR ANODIZED. OUTER DOME COLOR: WHITE. INNER DOME COLOR: WHITE 4 ? 5 ? 6 ? 7 ? 8 ? 9 ? 10 ? 11 ? 12 ? 13 ? 14 ? 15 ? PENDANT LIGHT SUSPENDED INDIRECT/ DIRECT LIGHTING 2'X4' DIRECT/INDIRECT FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURES LEGEND RECESSED COMPACT FLUORESCENT CAN LIGHT FIXTURE WITH INTEGRAL LENS. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 2'X4' FLUORESCENT LIGHT WITH PRISMATIC GASKETED LENS. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.D RECESSED INCANDESCENT CAN LIGHT FIXTURE WITH INTEGRAL LENS, SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. (PROVIDE DIMMER, TYP) TRACK LIGHT NEW EXIT LIGHT 2'X2' DIRECT/INDIRECT FLUORESCENT LIGHT 2'X2' FLUORESCENT ACRYLIC LENS FIXTURES.B A C H J 2'X4' FLUORESCENT LIGHT WITH ACRYLIC DIFFUSER SAFE FOR USE IN OPERATING ROOM. LAMPS TO HAVE DUAL SWITCHING.K EXIT P I/D SURGICAL LIGHT SUPPLIED BY OWNER AND INSTALLED BY G.C. G.C. TO PROVIDE & INSTALL UNISTRUT. VERIFY FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER. EXHAUST FAN DIMMER SWITCH RECESSED COMPACT FLUORESCENT CAN LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. RECESSED INCANDESCENT CAN LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. (PROVIDE DIMMER, TYP) F G 2'X4' LED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. E QUANTITY & TYPE OF LIGHT FIXTURES & CIRCUITS WITH SWITCH LOCATIONS TO BE REVIEWED AND DESIGNED / COORDINATED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR CL1 CEILING: 2'x2' ACT SECTION PLAN CL2 CEILING: GWB on METAL STUD SECTION PLAN 1 1/2" CHANNEL- 4' O.C. MAX. 7/8" CROSS-FURRING - 24" O.C. GYPSUM CEILING BOARD HANGER WIRE / FRAMING MEMBERS TO STRUCTURE ABOVE CL3 CEILING: SUSPENDED GYPSUM CEILING CEILING SYSTEMSGYP BD: COLOR:WHITE ACT-1:USG, MARS,CLIMAPLUS W/ SHADOWLINE TAPERED EDGE SIZE:24" X 24" COLOR:WHITE SUSPENSION SYSTEM:CG1 SIZE:15/16" COLOR:WHITE CG1:STANDARD GRID SYSTEM CG2:FULLY GASKETED GRID SYSTEM NEW CEILING GRID 10' -0" CL 1 10' -0" CL 1 10' -0" CL 1 10' -0" CL 1 10' -0" CL 1 10' -0" CL 1 EXPOSED STRUCTURE CEILING APPROX. 21' -6" TO BOTTOM OF JOIST @ LOW POINT APPROX. 25' -0" TO BOTTOM OF DECK TYP. ALL AREAS W/O DESIGNATED CEILING 40 YARD DASH TURF AREA 120 OVERRUN 122 SHOP 118 SKATING TREADMILL 117 SHOOTING AND STICK AREA 116 SHOOTING AND STICK AREA 115 TOILET 106 TOILET 107 CONFERENCE ROOM 102 OFFICE 103 OFFICE 104 TEAM DRESSING 109 TEAM DRESSING 112 SHOWER 111 SHOWER 114 TOILET 110 TOILET 113 OVERRUN 121 VISION TRAINING 105 VESTIBULE 100 MECHANICAL ROOM 108 STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING AREA 119 LOBBY/WAITING 101 PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/30/2023 10:28:46 AM XXX XXX 21-054 A230Invicta Training CenterREFLECTED CEILING PLANS 7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A230 1 LEVEL 1 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION LEVEL 1 0" T.O. PRECAST 28' -0" 122 SQ FT SIGNAGE BRICK-1MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT BRICK-2MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER BRICK-1MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT CSS-1CAST STONE SILL PFMA-1PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -SUN SHADE PFMC-1PREFINISHED METAL COPING PFMF-1PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING ASF-1ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT MSCN-1 ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT SCREEN WALL PFMC-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING BRICK-1 MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT BRICK-2 MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER BRICK-1 MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT CSS-1 CAST STONE SILL PFMA-1 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -SUN SHADE PFMC-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PFMF-1 PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING ASF-1 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT PFMA-2 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -ENTRY CANOPY ASF-1ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT BRICK-2MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER 1' - 4"LEVEL 1 0" T.O. PRECAST 28' -0" MSCN-1 ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT SCREEN WALL BRICK-1MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT BRICK-2MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER BRICK-1MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT CSS-1CAST STONE SILL ASF-1 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT PFMA-1PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -SUN SHADE PFMC-1PREFINISHED METAL COPING PFMF-1PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING PC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE - PEWTER -SANDBLAST PFMC-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING8"LEVEL 1 0" T.O. PRECAST 28' -0" BRICK-1 MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT BRICK-2 MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER BRICK-1 MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT CSS-1 CAST STONE SILL PFMA-1 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -SUN SHADE PFMC-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PFMF-1 PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING PC-1PRECAST CONCRETE - PEWTER -SANDBLAST PFMC-1PREFINISHED METAL COPING PC-1PRECAST CONCRETE - PEWTER -SANDBLAST 8"ASF-1 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT LEVEL 1 0" T.O. PRECAST 28' -0" ASF-1ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT MSCN-1 ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT SCREEN WALL PC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE - PEWTER -SANDBLAST PFMC-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING PROJECT NO:6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2020SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSRaARCHITECTURE + INTERIORS8/11/2023 1:16:21 PM XXX XXX 21-054 A310Invicta Training CenterEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - COLOR 7300 BUSH LAKE ROADEDINA, MN 55439SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A310 1 EAST ELEVATION - COLOR SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A310 2 NORTH ELEVATION - COLOR SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A310 3 SOUTH ELEVATION - COLOR SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A310 4 WEST ELEVATION - COLOR ISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE MATERIAL ID SPEC SECTION MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER TYPE FINISH COLOR SIZE NOTES ASF-1 084313 ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT TBD MFGR.CLEAR ANNODIZED GLASS. MIDNIGHT BRONZE MULLIONS W/ THERMAL BREAK BRICK-1 042001 MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT ENDICOTT VELOUR MANGANESE IRONSPOT MODULAR GROUT: TBD BRICK-2 042001 MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER INTERSTATE BRICK VELOUR PEWTER MODULAR GROUT: TBD CSS-1 047200 CAST STONE SILL MARCSTONE MFGR.INDIANA GREY MSCN-1 074213.01 ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT SCREEN WALL TBD CORRUGATED METAL PANEL MFGR. PC-1 034100 PRECAST CONCRETE - PEWTER - SANDBLAST FABCON SANDBLAST PIGMENT TO MATCH PEWTER BRICK SANDWICH PANEL PFMA-1 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING - SUN SHADE TBD MATTE MIDNIGHT BRONZE CUSTOM PFMA-2 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING - ENTRY CANOPY TBD MATTE MIDNIGHT BRONZE CUSTOM PFMC-1 075323 PREFINISHED METAL COPING TBD MIDNIGHT BRONZE PFMF-1 076200 PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING TBD MIDNIGHT BRONZE BRICK-1 MODULAR BRICK - MANGANESE IRONSPOT PC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE - PEWTER -SANDBLAST PFMF-1 PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING PFMA-1 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -SUN SHADE PFMA-2 PREFINISHED METAL AWNING -ENTRY CANOPY PFMC-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPINGCSS-1CAST STONE SILL BRICK-2MODULAR BRICK - PEWTER IN3lAllEIVA34 SNINNVid BKBM--L-1. ENGINEERS .= _ - HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS FOR INVICTA HOCKEY TRAINING 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD, EDINA MN 55439 BKBM Job No. 23348 August 11th, 2023 Prepared by: BKBM Engineers, Inc. 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430 (763) 843-0420 I hereby certify that these calculations were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Reg. No 61633 Date 08-11-23 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55430 763-843-0420 (F) 763-843-0421 3507 Ringsby Court, Suite 105, Denver, CO 80216 720-515-9807 www.bkbm.com VNIO2 AO All0 cr r- > Z Z :-;-. 2:, C ( ) :-1 HYDROLOGY FOR G5 -< INVICTA HOCKEY TRAINING 0 171 )...l 1-;-.1 0 -n EDINA, MINNESOTA AUGUST 11, 2023 -u > X r..) c, co m 0 -2 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION rn The Invicta Hockey Training facility is proposed on the existing 5.5 acre Minnesota Made property, located at 7300 Bush Lake Road. The property has an existing ice center facility, parking lots, an outdoor hockey rink, site lighting, and lawn space. The site does not currently have stormwater management features, such as rain gardens or underground infiltration tanks. Stormwater from a portion of the ice center runs off to the south, where water flows overland to a low point catch basin. Stormwater elsewhere on the property flows overland to the right of way on Bush Lake Road. As noted by the City of Edina staff, within Bush Lake Road there is an 100-year flood plane which has an high water elevation of 831.7'. EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS Detail 1/C600 of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shows the existing delineated site drainage areas. Table 1 briefly summarizes the ground cover characteristics and drainage routing of each numbered drainage area. Most of the site drainage to each respective drainage point is via overland sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow. Table 1: Existing Site Drainage Descriptions (Refer to Detail 1/C600) Drainage Area No. Description Drainage Routes to: 1 Portion of the existing ice center roof area, the lawn space for the outdoor ice area, boulevard, and concrete walk. Runs overland to be collected by onsite catch basin and conveyed to City storm sewer. 2 Existing bituminous parking lot, curbing, sidewalks, landscaping and boulevard area. Collected by catch basins within the right of way and conveyed within City storm sewer. EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE FLOW RATES HydroCAD was used to model the existing site hydrology. The NRCS Method of Abstractions was used in the model with Type II, 24-hour rainfall events (from the NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates) (refer to Table 3). NRCS curve numbers were derived based on topographic survey information (completed by Sunde) and information on cover and underlying soil types from geotechnical information from the 2002 Braun Intertec Report. Table 2 lists the derived curve runoff numbers for each cover type. Table 3: NOAA Atlas 14 24-hour Duration Storm Events for Each Return Period (inches) 2-year 10-year 2.85" 4.27" 100-year 7.49" IN3A1EIVd80 ONINNV1d NJ O w Table 2: NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group and Runoff Curve Numbers Ground Cover Type Hydrologic Soil Group Curve Number (CN) Existing Pervious Area B 61 Proposed Pervious Area B 61 Paving/Buildings NA 98 Peak runoff computations were performed for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year/24-hour return period rainfall event, listed in Table 3. The weighted curve number for each drainage area is based on a weighted average of each area of ground cover type as listed in Table 2. Peak HydroCAD runoff computations are summarized in Table 4 and are included as an appendix to this report. Table 4: Summary of Peak Runoff Rates: Existing Drainage Areas (Detail 1/C600) Drainage Area No. Time of Concentration (minutes) 24-hour Storm Events Peak Runoff Rates 2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year cfs) 1 5 1.95 4.12 10.16 2 5 1.66 2.80 5.66 i 3.61 6.92 15.82 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION The proposed project will add an additional hockey training facility to the property, including the necessary parking spaces, drive entrances, drive aisle, and a drive apron to the building's garage. The site will have accessible site walkways, and additionally, a connection to a proposed sidewalk, located within a public use easement. To meet the site development's stormwater management requirements, storm sewer improvements will be installed to collect water from the proposed development and convey it to two BMP features. A Rain Garden will collect water from the proposed building's roof and an infiltration basin will collect water from the site pavements. These BMPs allow for rate control, water quality volume, and water treatment standards to be met. VNIG3 JO 1110 PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE ROUTING VNIOB JO A110 Detail 2/C600 of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shows the proposed delineated si-T drainage areas. Table 5 gives a brief summary and routing of the proposed drainage patterns on site:--1 Table 5: Proposed Site Drainage Descriptions (Refer to Detail 2/C600) Drainage Area No. Description Drainage Routes to: 1 Portion of existing building roof. Collected by catch basins, routed to City storm sewer. 2 Proposed building roof. Rain Garden #1 3 Boulevard, and portion of existing parking lot, and proposed that cannot be collected without further impacts. Collected by catch basins within right of way, routed to City storm sewer. 4 Proposed parking lot, sidewalks, and landscape areas. Infiltration Pond #2 Rain Garden #1 Takes runoff from Area #2 Outlet structure to City storm sewer. Infiltration Takes runoff from Area #4 Outlet structure to City storm sewer. Pond #2 PROPOSED SITE STORM WATER TREATMENT HydroCAD was used to model the proposed site hydrology. The NRCS Method of Abstractions was used with Type II, 24-hour rainfall events (NOAA Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates) (refer to Table 3). NRCS curve numbers were derived based on a weighted average of each area of ground cover type. Refer to Table 2 for runoff curve numbers used in the proposed computations. The project is located within the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Current treatment and runoff standards for the district are the following; " 4.3.1 - Except for sites qualifying as "restricted" under subsection 4.3.2, an applicant for a permit under this rule must demonstrate that the implementation of its stormwater management plan will: a. Provide for the retention onsite of 1.1 inches of runoff from the regulated impervious surface of the site; i. Where infiltration or filtration facilities, practices or systems are proposed, pretreatment of runoff must be provided. ii. Drawdown of water levels in infiltration and filtration facilities must be within 48 hours. c;ITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 b. Limit peak runoff flow rates to that from existing conditions for the 2-, 10- and 100-year frequency storm events using a nested 24-hour rainfall distribution for all collectionlOM ENT where stormwater discharge leaves the site; and c. Provide for at least 60 percent annual removal efficiency for total phosphorus and at least 90 percent annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids from site runoff. i. Onsite retention systems may be included in demonstrating compliance with the total suspended solids and total phosphorus removal requirements. " The proposed patio project will generate 0.688 acres of regulated impervious surface. Due to the existing grades within Area 3, a small portion of the proposed pavements will not be able to be captured for treatment. In addition, runoff from the proposed public sidewalk will be collected within the right of way. However, Area #2 and Area #4 provide enough volume to overtreat to 2" of run off to meet the proposed requirements. CITY OF EDINA Regulated Impervious Surface Area = 0.689 acres = 29986 sq ft AUG 1 1 2023 Water Quality Volume = 1.1 in / 12 in/ft * 3560 sq ft = 2748 cu ft PLANNING DEPARTMENT The proposed Rain Garden #1 (Detail 8/C501) has a volume below the outlet of 1,224 cu ft and draws down the water quality volume over a 48-hour period. Please refer to the attached HydoCAD calculations for the proposed project conditions. Collecting 0.52 acres of regulated impervious, the Rain Garden can over treat 2" of runoff over the regulated impervious to a volume of up to 1,669 cu ft. The proposed Infiltration Pond #2 (Detail 9/C501) has a volume below the outlet of 1,985 cu ft and draws down the water quality volume over a 48-hour period. Please refer to the attached HydoCAD calculations for the proposed project conditions. Collecting 0.52 acres of regulated impervious, the Rain Garden can over treat 2" of runoff over the regulated impervious to a volume of up to 3,775 cu ft. Proposed Water Quality Volume = 1,224 cu ft (Rain Garden #1) + 1,985 cu ft (Infiltration Pond #2) -- 3,209 cu ft The proposed BMPs provide the water quality volume necessary. Runoffrates in the proposed condition are less than that of the existing project area. Table 6 shows a summary of the peak runoff rates for the proposed conditions. Table 7 compares the existing site runoff rates with the proposed site runoff rates. The proposed BMP high water level have 2' of separation from the proposed building lower floor opening of 837.5'. The Rain Garden's HWL is 835.5' and Infiltration Pond #2 has a HWL of 830.68'. A MIDs analysis has yet to be completed for this project to show compliance with removal efficiency requirements. Analysis will be provided to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed as part of their permit process. r- GD ED m m iN1013:10 A.110 Table 6: Summary of Peak Runoff Rates: Proposed Drainage Areas (Detail 2/C600) Drainage Area No. Time of Concentration (minutes) 24-hour Storm Events Peak Runoff Rates 2-year (cfs) 10-year (cfs) 100-year (cfs) 1 5 1.53 2.45 5.01 2 5 - - 3 5 1.61 2.60 4.68 4 5 - Rain Garden #1 0.45 1.64 3.25 Infiltration Pond #2 - 0.63 2.98 6.06 3.14 5.05 9.69 Table 7: Comparison of Peak Runoff Rates. Existing vs. Proposed (cfs) Condition 2-year/ 24-hr 10-year/ 24-hr 100-year/ 24-hr Existing 3.61 6.92 15.82 Proposed 3.14 5.05 9.69 Subcat Reach .67 acres of new/reconstructed impervious = 2678 cu ft WQV RG = 1224 cu ft RG2 = 1958 cu ft 1P CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Infiltation ond 2 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Subcat PRO. Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 SUBCATCH 2 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Routing Diagram for 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers, Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD@ 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Storm Type Curve Mode Duration B/B Depth AMC Name (hours) (inches) 1 2-yr MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.85 2 2 10-yr MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.27 2 3 100-yr MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 7.49 2 CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 ?023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Printed 8/11/2023 Page 2 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.617 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (PRO. SUBCATCH 1, PRO. SUBCATCH 2, PRO. SUBCATCH 3, PRO. SUBCATCH 4) 1.341 98 Roofs, HSG B (PRO. SUBCATCH 1, PRO. SUBCATCH 2, PRO. SUBCATCH 3, PRO. SUBCATCH 4) 1.958 86 TOTAL AREA CITY OF EDINA AUG 11 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 1.958 HSG B PRO. SUBCATCH 1, PRO. SUBCATCH 2, PRO. SUBCATCH 3, PRO. SUBCATCH 4 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 1.958 TOTAL AREA CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.617 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.617 >75% Grass cover, Good PRO. SUBCAT CH 1, PRO. SUBCAT CH 2, CITY OF EDINA PRO. SUBCAT AUG 1 1 2023 CH 3, PRO. "LANNING DEPARTMENT SUBCAT CH 4 0.000 1.341 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.341 Roofs PRO. SUBCAT CH 1, PRO. SUBCAT CH 2, PRO. SUBCAT CH 3, PRO. SUBCAT CH 4 0.000 1.958 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.958 TOTAL AREA 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In-Invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Width Diam/Height Inside-Fill Node Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) Nam( 1 1P 832.00 830.00 100.0 0.0200 0.013 0.0 '15.0 0.0 2 6P 827.50 825.46 307.4 0.0066 0.013 0.0 18.0 0.0 CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Time span=0.01-80.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 8000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat Runoff Area=0.460 ac 74.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.02" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=1.53 cfs 0.077 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH2: Subcat Runoff Area=0.655 ac 62.37% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.75" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=1.87 cfs 0.096 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat Runoff Area=0.501 ac 71.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.95" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=1.61 cfs 0.082 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat Runoff Area=0.342 ac 68.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.90" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=1.07 cfs 0.054 af Pond 1P: Rain Garden Peak Elev=835.25' Storage=1,312 cf Inflow=1.07 cfs 0.054 af Discarded=0.00 cfs 0.009 af Primary=0.45 cfs 0.024 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.46 cfs 0.032 af Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Peak Elev=830.46' Storage=2,091 cf Inflow=1.87 cfs 0.096 af Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.067 af Primary=0.63 cfs 0.029 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.65 cfs 0.096 af Total Runoff Area = 1.958 ac Runoff Volume = 0.309 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.89" 31.52% Pervious = 0.617 ac 68.48% Impervious = 1.341 ac CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT M$E 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall:2.85" Runoff Area0.460 ac Runoff Vol-u m00.077 af- Runoff DeOth;:2.02" T0=5.0 On ON=61/98 I 1.53 cfs I 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) 74' 0 n Runoff VNIC73 dO A110 C7) NJ INBIALLEIVd3C1 ONINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Runoff = 1.53 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.077 at Depth= 2.02" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Area (ac) CN Description 0.340 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.000 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.010 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.002 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.012 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.096 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.460 88 Weighted Average 0.120 61 26.00% Pervious Area 0.340 98 74.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Hydrograph :V\I_LHVd30 ONINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2. 85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Time Precip. Perv.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.01 8.01 0.24 0.00 0.10 0.01 10.01 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.03 12.01 1.37 0.00 1.15 0.80 14.01 2.46 0.18 2.23 0.04 16.01 2.61 0.23 2.38 0.02 18.01 2.71 0.26 2.47 0.02 20.01 2.78 0.28 2.55 0.01 22.01 2.82 0.30 2.59 0.01 24.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 26.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 28.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 30.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 32.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 34.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 36.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 38.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 40.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 42.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 44.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 46.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 48.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 50.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 52.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 54.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 56.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 58.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 60.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 62.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 64.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 66.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 68.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 70.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 72.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 74.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 76.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 78.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 VNICE d0 All0 0 LL -o r z z z G) o m H m z H — n Runoff VNIOB J011.10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (hours) 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 2 MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfalh=2.85" Runoff Area0.655 ac Runoff VolLT100.096 af 1.75U .75 TO=5.0 nu n ON=61/98 0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2. 85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 @ 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Runoff = 1.87 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Depth= 1.75" Routed to Pond 6P : Infiltation Pond 2 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Area (ac) CN Description 0.169 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.014 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.007 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.011 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.021 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.001 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.024 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.000 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.000 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.408 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.655 84 Weighted Average 0.246 61 37.63% Pervious Area 0.408 98 62.37% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Hydrograph 1N3LALtJVd34 ONINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Time Precip. Perv.Excess Imp.Excess Runoff (hours) (inches) (inches) (inches) fpfll 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.01 8.01 0.24 0.00 0.10 0.02 10.01 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.04 12.01 1.37 0.00 1.15 0.96 14.01 2.46 0.18 2.23 0.05 16.01 2.61 0.23 2.38 0.03 18.01 2.71 0.26 2.47 0.02 20.01 2.78 0.28 2.55 0.01 22.01 2.82 0.30 2.59 0.01 24.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 26.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 28.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 30.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 32.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 34.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 36.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 38.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 40.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 42.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 44.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 46.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 48.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 50.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 52.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 54.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 56.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 58.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 60.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 62.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 64.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 66.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 68.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0,00 70.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 72.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 74.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 76.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 78.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 VI\1103 J01110 1VI$E 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainall.=-2.0" Runoff Area0.01 ac RunOff Volurne1F0.0821af DePth41 .90" To=5.0 mlin ON=61/98 3 I- Runoff 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) O U. o- • Runoff VNIG3 JO A.110 INBIALLE1Vd34 SNINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Runoff = 1.61 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Depth= 1.95" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Area (ac) CN Description 0.031 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.074 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.005 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.035 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.356 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.501 87 Weighted Average 0.145 61 28.92% Pervious Area 0.356 98 71.08% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Hydrograph 1N3ALLEAVd30 SNINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Time Precip. Perv.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.01 8.01 0.24 0.00 0.10 0.01 10.01 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.03 12.01 1.37 0.00 1.15 0.84 14.01 2.46 0.18 2.23 0.04 16.01 2.61 0.23 2.38 0.02 18.01 2.71 0.26 2.47 0.02 20.01 2.78 0.28 2.55 0.01 22.01 2.82 0.30 2.59 0.01 24.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 26.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 28.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 30.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 32.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 34.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 36.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 38.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 40.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 42.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 44.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 46.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 48.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 50.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 52.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 54.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 56.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 58.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 60.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 62.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 64.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 66.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 68.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 70.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 72.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 74.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 76.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 78.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 VNIQB JO All0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) z 0 :r> G-) o 0 m c:=> 0 No • Runoff MSE -24-hr-3-- 2-yr Rain.IfalIT-2.65" Runoff Nvalr-0.342 ac Runoff VolOme;=0.054 af Runoff DeOth41.90" TO=5.0 ON=61/98 1.07 cfs L 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pacie 14 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Runoff = 1.07 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af, Depth= 1.90" Routed to Pond 1P : Rain Garden Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Area (ac) CN Description 0.001 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.233 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.001 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.106 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.001 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.342 87 Weighted Average 0.106 61 31.07% Pervious Area 0.236 98 68.93% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Hydrograph VNIG3 AO All0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Time Precip. Perv.Excess Imp.Excess Runoff (hours) (inches) (inches) (inches) (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.01 8.01 0.24 0.00 0.10 0.01 10.01 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.02 12.01 1.37 0.00 1.15 0.55 14.01 2.46 0.18 2.23 0.03 16.01 2.61 0.23 2.38 0.01 18.01 2.71 0.26 2.47 0.01 20.01 2.78 0.28 2.55 0.01 22.01 2.82 0.30 2.59 0.01 24.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 26.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 28.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 30.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 32.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 34.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 36.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 38.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 40.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 42.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 44.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 46.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 48.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 50.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 52.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 54.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 56.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 58.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 60.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 62.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 64.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 66.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 68.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 70.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 72.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 74.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 76.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 78.01 2.85 0.31 2.62 0.00 IN3IALLEIVAECI ONININVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Pond 1P: Rain Garden [92] Warning: Device #3 is above defined storage [58] Hint: Peaked 0.05' above defined flood level Inflow Area = 0.342 ac, 68.93% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.90" for 2-yr event Inflow = 1.07 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af Outflow = 0.46 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af, Atten= 57%, Lag= 5.5 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af Primary = 0.45 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 835.25' @ 12.21 hrs Surf.Area= 1,800 sf Storage= 1,312 cf Flood Elev= 835.20' Surf.Area= 1,740 sf Storage= 1,224 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 526.3 min calculated for 0.032 af (59% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 444.9 min ( 1,204.3 - 759.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 834.00' 3,000 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticpsted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area (feet) (sq-ft) Inc.Store Cum.Store (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 834.00 835.00 836.00 Device Routing 300 1,500 2,700 Invert 0 0 900 900 2,100 3,000 Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 835.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area above 835.00' Excluded Surface area = 1,500 sf #2 Device 4 835.20' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 836.10' 10.0' long + 1.0 '/' SideZ x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #4 Primary 832.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 100.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 832.00' / 830.00' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I 0.46 cfs 55 60 65 70 75 80 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time (hours) ,T6 0 LL 0.00 cfs 1.07 cfs I Inflow-ATea=0.342ac-- Pbak Elpv*835.25' $torage=1,3 2 pf 0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=835.25' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.45 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW=835.25' (Free Discharge) t-4=Culvert (Passes 0.45 cfs of 9.57 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.45 cfs @ 0.73 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=834.00' (Free Discharge) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 1P: Rain Garden Hydrograph n Inflow q Outflow n Discarded n Primary o Secondary CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Hydrograph for Pond 1P: Rain Garden Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary (cubic-feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0 834.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0 834.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.00 4 834.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.01 29 834.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.01 0.01 81 834.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.01 0.02 185 834.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.01 0.55 804 834.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.01 0.03 1,237 835.21 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 16.01 0.01 1,232 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 18.01 0.01 1,230 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 20.01 0.01 1,229 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 22.01 0.01 1,227 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.01 0.00 1,224 835.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.01 0.00 1,207 835.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.01 0.00 1,191 835.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.01 0.00 1,175 835.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.00 1,160 835.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.01 0.00 1,145 835.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00 1,132 835.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.01 0.00 1,119 835.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.01 0.00 1,107 835.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.01 0.00 1,096 835.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.01 0.00 1,085 835.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.01 0.00 1,074 835.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.01 0.00 1,065 835.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.01 0.00 1,055 835.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.01 0.00 1,047 835.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.01 0.00 1,038 835.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.01 0.00 1,031 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.01 0.00 1,023 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.01 0.00 1,016 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.01 0.00 1,010 835.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.01 0.00 1,003 835.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.01 0.00 998 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.01 0.00 992 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.01 0.00 987 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.01 0.00 982 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.01 0.00 977 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 973 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.01 0.00 969 835.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 • CITY OF EDINA AUG 11 2023 PLi-\INING DEPASINVENi 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 [58] Hint: Peaked 0.06' above defined flood level Inflow Area = 0.655 ac, 62.37% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.75" for 2-yr event Inflow = 1.87 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af Outflow = 0.65 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Atten= 65%, Lag= 7.5 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.067 af Primary = 0.63 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af Routed to nonexistent node 2P Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 830.46' @ 12.25 hrs Surf.Area= 1,730 sf Storage= 2,091 cf Flood Elev= 830.40' Surf.Area= 1,696 sf Storage= 1,985 cf Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 822.2 min ( 1,583.7 - 761.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 828.90' 8,472 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticpsted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 828.90 830.00 831.00 832.00 833.00 Device Routing 983 1,473 2,030 2,665 3,379 Invert 0 0 1,351 1,351 1,752 3,102 2,348 5,450 3,022 8,472 Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 828.90' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Secondary 832.99' 10.0' long + 1.0 '/' SideZ x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 827.50' 18.0" Round Culvert L= 307.4' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 827.50' / 825.46' S= 0.0066'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 3 830.40' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads CITY OF EDINA AUG .1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.87 cfs I 0.00 cfs ViN103 J01110 INI3IALLEiVci30 ONINNV-18 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Prepared by BKBM Engineers HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Printed 8/11/2023 Page 20 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.25 hrs HW=830.46' (Free Discharge) .‘-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.63 cfs @ 12.25 hrs HW=830.46' (Free Discharge) t— =Culvert (Passes 0.63 cfs of 9.94 cfs potential flow) T-4=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.63 cfs @ 0.81 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=828.90' (Free Discharge) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Hydrograph L i L I Li I I I I I I Iriflow Are=0.65 ac Peak Elev,839.461 Storage=2,091 cf 0 r 0.65 cfs 0.63 cfs I "• .7z7zz/o/./x7 /..7 7z7zo.v.7772.7z7777- 777777/, e.14,11Z/ZZ/Z/ 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) • Inflow 0 Outflow n Discarded n Primary 0 Secondary iN3n1E1Vd30 ONINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 2-yr Rainfall=2.85" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Hydrograph for Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Discarded (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.01 0 828.90 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 8.01 0.02 17 828.92 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 10.01 0.04 121 829.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 12.01 0.96 1,109 829.83 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 14.01 0.05 1,999 830.41 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.00 16.01 0.03 1,990 830.40 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 18.01 0.02 1,988 830.40 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 20.01 0.01 1,980 830.40 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 22.01 0.01 1,942 830.37 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 24.01 0.00 1,864 830.33 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 26.01 0.00 1,742 830.25 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 28.01 0.00 1,623 830.18 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 30.01 0.00 1,507 830.10 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.00 1,393 830.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 34.01 0.00 1,283 829.95 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00 1,175 829.88 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 38.01 0.00 1,070 829.80 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 40.01 0.00 968 829.73 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 42.01 0.00 867 829.65 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 44.01 0.00 770 829.58 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 46.01 0.00 675 829.50 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 48.01 0.00 582 829.43 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 50.01 0.00 492 829.35 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 52.01 0.00 404 829.28 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 54.01 0.00 319 829.20 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 56.01 0.00 236 829.13 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 58.01 0.00 156 829.05 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 60.01 0.00 79 828.98 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 62.01 0.00 4 828.90 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 64.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VNIC13 AC) AJJO 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pacie 22 Time span=0.01-80.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 8000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat Runoff Area=0.460 ac 74.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.23" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=2.45 cfs 0.124 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat Runoff Area=0.655 ac 62.37% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.87" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=3.12 cfs 0.157 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat Runoff Area=0.501 ac 71.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.14" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=2.60 cfs 0.131 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat Runoff Area=0.342 ac 68.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.08" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=1.74 cfs 0.088 af Pond 1P: Rain Garden Peak Elev=835.32' Storage=1,435 cf Inflow=1.74 cfs 0.088 af Discarded=0.00 cfs 0.009 af Primary=1.64 cfs 0.057 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=1.64 cfs 0.066 af Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Peak Elev=830.57' Storage=2,288 cf Inflow=3.12 cfs 0.157 af Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.070 af Primary=2.98 cfs 0.087 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=3.00 cfs 0.157 af Total Runoff Area = 1.958 ac Runoff Volume = 0.500 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.06" 31.52% Pervious = 0.617 ac 68.48% Impervious = 1.341 ac -0 Z c z rn /N103 JO A110 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Runoff = 2.45 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.124 af, Depth= 3.23" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (ac) CN Description 0.340 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.000 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.010 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.002 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.012 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.096 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.460 88 Weighted Average 0.120 61 26.00% Pervious Area 0.340 98 74.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 0 LL Hydrograph 12.45 cfs I MSE 24-hr 3 L I Q-yr Rainfall:r4.27" Runoff kea.4.460 ac RunOff VolOme=0.124 af Runoff DeOth43.23" TC=5.0 nu n ON=61/98 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) II Runoff I. fV O NJ CO 0 H -n rn 0 IN3IALLiAtid30 SNINNYld 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Time Precip. Perv.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.01 6.01 0.22 0.00 0.08 0.01 8.01 0.36 0.00 0.19 0.02 10.01 0.59 0.00 0.40 0.05 12.01 2.05 0.08 1.82 1.27 14.01 3.68 0.66 3.45 0.06 16.01 3.91 0.77 3.68 0.03 18.01 4.05 0.84 3.82 0.03 20.01 4.16 0.89 3.92 0.02 22.01 4.23 0.93 4.00 0.01 24.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 26.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 28.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 30.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 32.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 34.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 36.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 38.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 40.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 42.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 44.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 46.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 48.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 50.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 52.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 54.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 56.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 58.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 60.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 62.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 64.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 66.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 68.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 70.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 72.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 74.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 76.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 78.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 VNIC33 AO A1I0 0 LL M Runoff' 1N131A1i8VdDCI SNINNVid VNICIE dO A110 Depth;t2.87" T.=..5.0 min ON=61/98 IRiain•i!a1144.2 Runoff .kea:9.655 Runoff VolAjme#0.-157 Runoff 80 65 70 75 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (hours) 50 55 60 3- 2 0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Runoff = 3.12 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.157 af, Depth= 2.87" Routed to Pond 6P : Infiltation Pond 2 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Irnperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (ac) CN Description 0.169 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.014 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.007 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.011 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.021 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.001 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.024 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.000 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.000 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.408 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.655 84 Weighted Average 0.246 61 37.63% Pervious Area 0.408 98 62.37% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Hydrograph 1N3!Al18Vd30 ONINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Time Precip. Perv.Excess Imp.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.01 6.01 0.22 0.00 0.08 0.02 8.01 0.36 0.00 0.19 0.03 10.01 0.59 0.00 0.40 0.06 12.01 2.05 0.08 1.82 1.57 14.01 3.68 0.66 3.45 0.08 16.01 3.91 0.77 3.68 0.04 18.01 4.05 0.84 3.82 0.03 20.01 4.16 0.89 3.92 0.02 22.01 4.23 0.93 4.00 0.02 24.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.01 26.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 28.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 30.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 32.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 34.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 36.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 38.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 40.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 42.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 44.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 46.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 48.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 50.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 52.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 54.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 56.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 58.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 60.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 62.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 64.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 66.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 68.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 70.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 72.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 74.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 76.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 78.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 VNI03 JO A110 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Riairfallr-4.*" -Runoff Alrda0.501 ac Runoff Vol0m00.131 af Runoff Depth= 3.14" To=5.0 Whin -014=-61/98- 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) 0 LL • Runoff VNICI3 JO All0 INIBIAL8Vd3C1 ONINNVld 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Runoff = 2.60 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.131 af, Depth= 3.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (ac) CN Description 0.031 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.074 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.005 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.035 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.356 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.501 87 Weighted Average 0.145 61 28.92% Pervious Area 0.356 98 71.08% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Hydrograph 1.N31A118Vd3C1 ONINNVid 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Time Precip. Perv.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.01 6.01 0.22 0.00 0.08 0.02 8.01 0.36 0.00 0.19 0.02 10.01 0.59 0.00 0.40 0.05 12.01 2.05 0.08 1.82 1.34 14.01 3.68 0.66 3.45 0.07 16.01 3.91 0.77 3.68 0.03 18.01 4.05 0.84 3.82 0.03 20.01 4.16 0.89 3.92 0.02 22.01 4.23 0.93 4.00 0.01 24.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.01 26.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 28.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 30.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 32.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 34.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 36.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 38.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 40.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 42.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 44.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 46.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 48.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 50.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 52.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 54.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 56.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 58.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 60.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 62.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 64.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 66.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 68.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 70.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 72.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 74.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 76.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 78.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 VNIC33 JO All0 1.74 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall:4.27" Runoff Area49.342 ac Runoff Volume=0.088 af r r f Runoff De Oth=r3.03"- TC=5.0 rnin ON=61/08 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) '167 0 LL n Runoff VNI03 JO All0 IN3tAiLLJVd34 ONINNV7d 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Runoff = 1.74 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af, Depth= 3.08" Routed to Pond 1P : Rain Garden Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (ac) CN Description 0.001 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.233 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.001 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.106 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.001 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.342 87 Weighted Average 0.106 61 31.07% Pervious Area 0.236 98 68.93% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Hydrograph 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Time Precip. Perv.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.00 6.01 0.22 0.00 0.08 0.01 8.01 0.36 0.00 0.19 0.02 10.01 0.59 0.00 0.40 0.03 12.01 2.05 0.08 1.82 0.89 14.01 3.68 0.66 3.45 0.05 16.01 3.91 0.77 3.68 0.02 18.01 4.05 0.84 3.82 0.02 20.01 4.16 0.89 3.92 0.01 22.01 4.23 0.93 4.00 0.01 24.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 26.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 28.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 30.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 32.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 34.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 36.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 38.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 40.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 42.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 44.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 46.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 48.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 50.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 52.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 54.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 56.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 58.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 60.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 62.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 64.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 66.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 68.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 70.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 72.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 74.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 76.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 78.01 4.27 0.95 4.03 0.00 IN3lAIIHVc130 DNINNVid VNIC3 d0 A.110 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Summary for Pond 1P: Rain Garden [92] Warning: Device #3 is above defined storage [58] Hint: Peaked 0.12' above defined flood level Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = 0.342 ac, 68.93% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.08" for 10-yr event 1.74 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af 1.64 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 1.1 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af Primary = 1.64 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 835.32' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,880 sf Storage= 1,435 cf Flood Elev= 835.20' Surf.Area= 1,740 sf Storage= 1,224 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 305.4 min calculated for 0.066 af (75% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 237.1 min ( 993.0 - 755.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 834.00' 3,000 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area (feet) (sq-ft) Inc.Store Cum.Store (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 834.00 835.00 836.00 Device Routing 300 1,500 2,700 Invert 0 0 900 900 2,100 3,000 Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 835.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area above 835.00' Excluded Surface area = 1,500 sf #2 Device 4 835.20' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 836.10' 10.0' long + 1.0 '/' SideZ x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #4 Primary 832.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 100.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 832.00' / 830.00' S= 0.0200'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT LL 0 0.00 cfs 0 VNIC:13 .d0 1110 65 70 75 80 20 25 10 15 60 • Inflow 0 Outflow MI Discarded • Primary Secondary 30 35 40 45 50 55 Time (hours) 11.74 cfs Inflow Area=0.342 ac Peak Elev=83.32' $torage=1,435 Cf 1.64 cfs 1.64 cfs 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=835.32' (Free Discharge) 't-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.64 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=835.32' (Free Discharge) t-4=Culvert (Passes 1.64 cfs of 9.69 cfs potential flow) '2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.64 cfs @ 1.12 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=834.00' (Free Discharge) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 1P: Rain Garden Hydrograph 1N2tAablVd3C3 ONINNVic, 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33 Hydrograph for Pond I P: Rain Garden Time Inflow Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary (hours) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0 834.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0 834.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.00 14 834.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.01 68 834.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.01 0.02 161 834.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.01 0.03 332 834.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.01 0.89 1,287 835.24 0.28 0.00 0.28 14.01 0.05 1,242 835.21 0.05 0.00 0.04 16.01 0.02 1,235 835.21 0.02 0.00 0.02 18.01 0.02 1,233 835.21 0.02 0.00 0.02 20.01 0.01 1,231 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 22.01 0.01 1,229 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 24.01 0.00 1,226 835.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.01 0.00 1,208 835.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.01 0.00 1,192 835.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.01 0.00 1,176 835.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.00 1,161 835.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.01 0.00 1,146 835.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00 1,133 835.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.01 0.00 1,120 835.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.01 0.00 1,108 835.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.01 0.00 1,096 835.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.01 0.00 1,085 835.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.01 0.00 1,075 835.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.01 0.00 1,065 835.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.01 0.00 1,056 835.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.01 0.00 1,047 835.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.01 0.00 1,039 835.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.01 0.00 1,031 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.01 0.00 1,024 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.01 0.00 1,017 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.01 0.00 1,010 835.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.01 0.00 1,004 835.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.01 0.00 998 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.01 0.00 992 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.01 0.00 987 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.01 0.00 982 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.01 0.00 977 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 973 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.01 0.00 969 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 VNIO3 dO 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34 Summary for Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 [58] Hint: Peaked 0.17' above defined flood level Inflow Area = 0.655 ac, 62.37% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.87" for 10-yr event Inflow = 3.12 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.157 af Outflow = 3.00 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.157 af, Atten= 4%, Lag= 1.0 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.070 af Primary = 2.98 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af Routed to nonexistent node 2P Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 830.57' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,793 sf Storage= 2,288 cf Flood Elev= 830.40' Surf.Area= 1,696 sf Storage= 1,985 cf Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 532.3 min ( 1,291.0 - 758.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 828.90' 8,472 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticpsted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 828.90 830.00 831.00 832.00 833.00 Device Routing 983 1,473 2,030 2,665 3,379 Invert 0 0 1,351 1,351 1,752 3,102 2,348 5,450 3,022 8,472 Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 828.90' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Secondary 832.99' 10.0' long + 1.0 '/' SideZ x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 827.50' 18.0" Round Culvert L= 307.4' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 827.50' / 825.46' S= 0.0066'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 3 830.40' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 13.12 cfs Inflow Area=0.655 ac Peak Elev=830.57' $to;rage=2,288 Cf I 3.00cfs 2.98 cfs r r r 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=830.57' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.97 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=830.57' (Free Discharge) t---1=Culvert (Passes 2.97 cfs of 10.10 cfs potential flow) 4 T =Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 2.97 cfs @ 1.36 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=828.90' (Free Discharge) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Hydrograph O LL /7/07 /%0.7 X07W07W./W0.7 %//077!,/ 7 0.00 0 III Inflow 1:10utflow MI Discarded • Primary ID Secondary 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36 Hydrograph for Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Discarded (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.01 0 828.90 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.02 20 828.92 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 8.01 0.03 106 829.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 10.01 0.06 323 829.21 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 12.01 1.57 1,910 830.36 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 14.01 0.08 2,008 830.41 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.00 16.01 0.04 1,997 830.41 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00 18.01 0.03 1,994 830.41 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 20.01 0.02 1,990 830.40 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 22.01 0.02 1,983 830.40 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 24.01 0.01 1,935 830.37 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 26.01 0.00 1,812 830.30 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 28.01 0.00 1,691 830.22 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 30.01 0.00 1,573 830.15 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.00 1,458 830.07 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 34.01 0.00 1,346 830.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00 1,237 829.92 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 38.01 0.00 1,130 829.85 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 40.01 0.00 1,026 829.77 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 42.01 0.00 924 829.70 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 44.01 0.00 825 829.62 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 46.01 0.00 729 829.55 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 48.01 0.00 635 829.47 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 50.01 0.00 543 829.40 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 52.01 0.00 454 829.32 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 54.01 0.00 367 829.25 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 56.01 0.00 283 829.17 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 58.01 0.00 202 829.10 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 60.01 0.00 123 829.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 62.01 0.00 46 828.95 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 64.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37 Time span=0.01-80.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 8000 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat Runoff Area=0.460 ac 74.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.16" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=4.68 cfs 0.236 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat Runoff Area=0.655 ac 62.37% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.67" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=6.22 cfs 0.310 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH3: Subcat Runoff Area=0.501 ac 71.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.04" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=5.01 cfs 0.252 af SubcatchmentPRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat Runoff Area=0.342 ac 68.93% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.95" Tc=5.0 min CN=61/98 Runoff=3.38 cfs 0.170 af Pond 1P: Rain Garden Peak Elev=835.38' Storage=1,565 cf Inflow=3.38 cfs 0.170 af Discarded=0.00 cfs 0.009 af Primary=3.25 cfs 0.139 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=3.25 cfs 0.147 af Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Peak EIev=830.68' Storage=2,479 cf Inflow=6.22 cfs 0.310 af Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.073 af Primary=6.06 cfs 0.237 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=6.08 cfs 0.310 af Total Runoff Area = 1.958 ac Runoff Volume = 0.968 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.93" 31.52% Pervious = 0.617 ac 68.48% Impervious = 1.341 ac CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3 .1.6" 0 LL 2 55 65 70 75 80 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (hours) 50 60 n Runoff 5 MSE 24-hi- 3 190-yr-Roirright7-.0"- Rimoff Alrea.'=0.460 ac Runoff Volme;=0.-236 af- Runoff DePth=r6.116" To=5.9 N=61/98 4 CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 38 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Runoff = 4.68 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.236 af, Depth= 6.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Area (ac) CN Description 0.340 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.000 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.010 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.002 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.012 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.096 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.460 88 Weighted Average 0.120 61 26.00% Pervious Area 0.340 98 74.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Hydrograph PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 Time Precip. (hours) (inches) Perv.Excess (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.02 6.01 0.38 0.00 0.21 0.03 8.01 0.63 0.00 0.44 0.04 10.01 1.03 0.00 0.82 0.09 12.01 3.59 0.61 3.36 2.44 14.01 6.46 2.32 6.22 0.12 16.01 6.86 2.60 6.63 0.06 18.01 7.11 2.78 6.87 0.05 20.01 7.30 2.92 7.06 0.03 22.01 7.42 3.01 7.18 0.02 24.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.01 26.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 28.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 30.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 32.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 34.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 36.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 38.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 40.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 42.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 44.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 46.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 48.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 50.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 52.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 54.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 56.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 58.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 60.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 62.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 64.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 66.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 68.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 70.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 72.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 74.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 76.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 78.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Runoff' L L Runoff .A.rea.0.655 ac Runoff VolUme#0.$10 11-af- RunoffP 4 eOth5.617" 1 TO=5.0 mi n ON=61/98 MS1E 24-hr 3 100/r Rainfa1147.0" I 6.22 cfs L 6- T 1 5- 4- 3- 2- — I--_4 — — 4 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Runoff = 6.22 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.310 af, Depth= 5.67" Routed to Pond 6P : Infiltation Pond 2 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Area (ac) CN Description 0.169 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.014 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.007 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.011 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.021 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.001 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.024 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.000 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.000 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.408 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.655 84 Weighted Average 0.246 61 37.63% Pervious Area 0.408 98 62.37% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Hydrograph o- 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) O 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 41 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 Time Precip. Perv.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) Imp.Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.02 6.01 0.38 0.00 0.21 0.04 8.01 0.63 0.00 0.44 0.05 10.01 1.03 0.00 0.82 0.11 12.01 3.59 0.61 3.36 3.17 14.01 6.46 2.32 6.22 0.16 16.01 6.86 2.60 6.63 0.08 18.01 7.11 2.78 6.87 0.06 20.01 7.30 2.92 7.06 0.05 22.01 7.42 3.01 7.18 0.03 24.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.01 26.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 28.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 30.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 32.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 34.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 36.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 38.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 40.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 42.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 44.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 46.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 48.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 50.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 52.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 54.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 56.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 58.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 60.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 62.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 64.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 66.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 68.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 70.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 72.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 74.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 1. Dr Z 78.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 Z C7) O P.) I— — + — — —I MSE 24-hi- 3 100-yr i4ainta114749" RUnoff Pq'ea0.01 ac Ruk•ff VolumeIF0.52 af ' Rurioff'DePth46.04" Td=5.9 nlin 1%1 -61/08 VNIC13 JO A110 INBIAL1EIVc130 ONINNVid 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (hours) 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 0- • Runoff 5.01 cfs I— 5- -, 4- —t 7; t 3- 3 o u. r r 2- r r r -1 r 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 Prepared by BKBM Engineers HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Printed 8/11/2023 Page 42 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO . SUBCATCH 3 Runoff = 5.01 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.252 at Depth= 6.04" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Area (ac) CN Description 0.031 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.074 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.005 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.035 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.356 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.501 87 Weighted Average 0.145 61 28.92% Pervious Area 0.356 98 71.08% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Hydrograph HNI03 JO A_LIO I. O 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 43 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 Time Precip. Perv.Excess Innp.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.02 6.01 0.38 0.00 0.21 0.03 8.01 0.63 0.00 0.44 0.05 10.01 1.03 0.00 0.82 0.09 12.01 3.59 0.61 3.36 2.60 14.01 6.46 2.32 6.22 0.13 16.01 6.86 2.60 6.63 0.06 18.01 7.11 2.78 6.87 0.05 20.01 7.30 2.92 7.06 0.04 22.01 7.42 3.01 7.18 0.02 24.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.01 26.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 28.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 30.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 32.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 34.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 36.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 38.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 40.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 42.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 44.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 46.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 48.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 50.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 52.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 54.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 56.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 58.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 60.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 62.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 64.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 66.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 68.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 70.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 72.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 74.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 76.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 78.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 IN3IALLEIVd.30 ONINNVici 3.38 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 r 100-yr Rainfal147.0" RUnoff ac Runoff VolUme#0.170 af Ruroff4DeOth45.95" T":5.0 m'in ON=61/98 — I- 1N3LALLUVd30 9NINNV7d 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 44 Summary for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Runoff = 3.38 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.170 af, Depth= 5.95" Routed to Pond 1P : Rain Garden Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Area (ac) CN Description 0.001 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.233 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.001 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.106 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.001 98 Roofs, HSG B 0.342 87 Weighted Average 0.106 61 31.07% Pervious Area 0.236 98 68.93% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, min Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Hydrograph :76 2 0 LL VN!09 JO All0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Time (hours) n Runoffi IN_91/11.1bVci3C1 SNINNV7d 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 45 Hydrograph for Subcatchment PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 Time Precip. Perv.Excess Imp.Excess (hours) (inches) (inches) (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.01 6.01 0.38 0.00 0.21 0.02 8.01 0.63 0.00 0.44 0.03 10.01 1.03 0.00 0.82 0.06 12.01 3.59 0.61 3.36 1.74 14.01 6.46 2.32 6.22 0.09 16.01 6.86 2.60 6.63 0.04 18.01 7.11 2.78 6.87 0.03 20.01 7.30 2.92 7.06 0.03 22.01 7.42 3.01 7.18 0.02 24.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.01 26.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 28.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 30.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 32.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 34.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 36.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 38.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 40.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 42.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 44.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 46.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 48.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 50.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 52.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 54.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 56.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 58.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 60.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 62.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 64.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 66.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 68.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 70.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 72.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 74.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 76.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 78.01 7.49 3.06 7.25 0.00 VNICIa JO All0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 46 Summary for Pond 1P: Rain Garden [92] Warning: Device #3 is above defined storage [58] Hint: Peaked 0.18' above defined flood level Inflow Area = 0.342 ac, 68.93% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.95" for 100-yr event Inflow = 3.38 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.170 af Outflow = 3.25 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Atten= 4%, Lag= 0.9 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af Primary = 3.25 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.139 af Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 835.38' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,961 sf Storage= 1,565 cf Flood Elev= 835.20' Surf.Area= 1,740 sf Storage= 1,224 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 174.3 min calculated for 0.147 af (87% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 124.1 min ( 875.9 - 751.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 834.00' 3,000 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area (feet) (sq-ft) Inc.Store Cum.Store (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 834.00 835.00 836.00 Device Routing 300 1,500 2,700 Invert 0 0 900 900 2,100 3,000 Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 835.00' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area above 835.00' Excluded Surface area = 1,500 sf #2 Device 4 835.20' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Secondary 836.10' 10.0' long + 1.0 '/' SideZ x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #4 Primary 832.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 100.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 832.00' / 830.00' S= 0.0200'/' Cc= 0.900 -o n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.23 sf r- Z z 0 G-) 0 1-, co VNICB dO A110 55 60 65 70 30 35 40 45 50 Time (hours) 75 80 10 15 20 25 0 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=835.38' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.24 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=835.38' (Free Discharge) A-4=Culvert (Passes 3.24 cfs of 9.81 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 3.24 cfs @ 1.40 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=834.00' (Free Discharge) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 1P: Rain Garden Hydrograph 2-d 0 LL n Inflow q Outflow n Discarded n Primary q Secondary 1 3.38 cfs Inflow Area=0.342 ac _ _ i 3.25 cfs Peak Elev=8*301 $torage=1,505 cf °EP 4 VNI03 dO A110 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 48 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Hydrograph for Pond 1P: Rain Garden Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary (cubic-feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0 834.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 2 834.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.01 54 834.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.02 177 834.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.01 0.03 365 834.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.01 0.06 686 834.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.01 1.74 1,426 835.31 1.54 0.00 1.53 0.00 14.01 0.09 1,252 835.22 0.09 0.00 0.08 0.00 16.01 0.04 1,242 835.21 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00 18.01 0.03 1,239 835.21 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 20.01 0.03 1,236 835.21 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.00 22.01 0.02 1,232 835.20 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 24.01 0.01 1,228 835.20 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.01 0.00 1,209 835.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.01 0.00 1,193 835.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.01 0.00 1,177 835.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.00 1,162 835.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.01 0.00 1,147 835.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00 1,134 835.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.01 0.00 1,121 835.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.01 0.00 1,109 835.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.01 0.00 1,097 835.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.01 0.00 1,086 835.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.01 0.00 1,076 835.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.01 0.00 1,066 835.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.01 0.00 1,057 835.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.01 0.00 1,048 835.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.01 0.00 1,039 835.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.01 0.00 1,032 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.01 0.00 1,024 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.01 0.00 1,017 835.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.01 0.00 1,011 835.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.01 0.00 1,004 835.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.01 0.00 998 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.01 0.00 993 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.01 0.00 987 835.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.01 0.00 982 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.01 0.00 978 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 973 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.01 0.00 969 835.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1N31NIEiVc130 9NINNV1ci NJ VNI03 dO A110 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 49 Summary for Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 [58] Hint: Peaked 0.28' above defined flood level Inflow Area = 0.655 ac, 62.37% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.67" for 100-yr event Inflow = 6.22 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.310 af Outflow = 6.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.310 af, Atten= 2%, Lag= 0.8 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.073 af Primary = 6.06 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.237 af Routed to nonexistent node 2P Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.01-80.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 830.68' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,851 sf Storage= 2,479 cf Flood Elev= 830.40' Surf.Area= 1,696 sf Storage= 1,985 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 289.9 min calculated for 0.310 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 290.2 min ( 1,045.3 - 755.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 828.90' 8,472 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 828.90 830.00 831.00 832.00 833.00 Device Routing 983 1,473 2,030 2,665 3,379 Invert 0 0 1,351 1,351 1,752 3,102 2,348 5,450 3,022 8,472 Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 828.90' 0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Secondary 832.99' 10.0' long + 1.0 '/' SideZ x 5.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 827.50' 18.0" Round Culvert L= 307.4' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 827.50' / 825.46' S= 0.0066 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 3 830.40' 48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads CITY OF EDIcIVAit AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT L inflow Area=9.605 ac P-taak-E-Ipv-83p,681-- Storage=2,479 cf 50 60 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time (hours) 55 65 70 75 80 I 6.05 cfs 0.00c 0 51-/ O u. 3: 2-s L 16.22cfs 6.06 cfs r n Inflow q Outflow n Discarded n Primary q Secondary VNIGB JO 1110 C") NJ O NJ IN3WILIVd30 SNINNVld 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 50 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=830.68' (Free Discharge) t-1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=6.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=830.68' (Free Discharge) 1-1=Culvert (Passes 6.04 cfs of 10.25 cfs potential flow) T-4=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 6.04 cfs @ 1.73 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.01 hrs HW=828.90' (Free Discharge) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Hydrograph INEIA118Vd30 SNIN1 NV -1 ci 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current MSE 24-hr 3 100-yr Rainfall=7.49" Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 51 Hydrograph for Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Discarded (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.01 0.02 25 828.92 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 6.01 0.04 161 829.06 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 8.01 0.05 404 829.28 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 10.01 0.11 869 829.65 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 12.01 3.17 2,280 830.57 2.89 0.02 2.87 0.00 14.01 0.16 2,024 830.42 0.16 0.02 0.14 0.00 16.01 0.08 2,007 830.41 0.08 0.02 0.06 0.00 18.01 0.06 2,003 830.41 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.00 20.01 0.05 1,998 830.41 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.00 22.01 0.03 1,992 830.40 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 24.01 0.01 1,979 830.40 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 26.01 0.00 1,857 830.32 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 28.01 0.00 1,734 830.25 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 30.01 0.00 1,615 830.17 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.00 1,499 830.10 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 34.01 0.00 1,386 830.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 36.01 0.00 1,276 829.95 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 38.01 0.00 1,168 829.87 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 40.01 0.00 1,063 829.80 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 42.01 0.00 961 829.72 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 44.01 0.00 861 829.65 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 46.01 0.00 763 829.57 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 48.01 0.00 668 829.50 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 50.01 0.00 576 829.42 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 52.01 0.00 486 829.35 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 54.01 0.00 398 829.27 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 56.01 0.00 314 829.20 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 58.01 0.00 231 829.12 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 60.01 0.00 151 829.05 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 62.01 0.00 74 828.97 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 64.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.01 0.00 0 828.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VNIGE JO A110 .121111ALLEIVc130 9NINNV1d VN103 JO A1.10 2023-07-13-Proposed 23348 - Current Table of Contents Prepared by BKBM Engineers Printed 8/11/2023 HydroCAD® 10.20-3c s/n 01655 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Reports 1 Routing Diagram 2 Rainfall Events Listing 3 Area Listing (all nodes) 4 Soil Listing (all nodes) 5 Ground Covers (all nodes) 6 Pipe Listing (all nodes) 2-yr Event 7 Node Listing 8 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 10 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 12 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 14 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 16 Pond 1P: Rain Garden 19 Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 10-yr Event 22 Node Listing 23 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 25 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 27 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 29 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 31 Pond 1P: Rain Garden 34 Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 100-yr Event 37 Node Listing 38 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 1 40 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 2 42 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 3 44 Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4: Subcat PRO. SUBCATCH 4 46 Pond 1P: Rain Garden 49 Pond 6P: Infiltation Pond 2 PTV FDINA 404.(:3 ?023 PLANNiMii bW4ARTMENT A Geotechnical Evaluation Report for Hillcrest Development Midwest Tennis Club Building 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, Minnesota S Professional Certification I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Henry Vloo, PE Associate - Senior Engineer License Number: 21140 July 23, 2002 Project CMXX-02-0266 Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN 1NTERTEC Braun Intertec Corporation 6801 Wosningten Avenue S Minneapolis: MN 5:7:439 Fhone 252 941.5600 Fox'. 552441 4151 Web brourwnenec.com CITY nF EDINA J July 23, 2002 AUG 2023 Project CMXX-02-0266 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Scott Tankenoff Hillcrest Development 2424 Kennedy Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413 Dear Mr. Tankenoff: Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Midwest Tennis Club Building, 7300 Bush Lake Road, Edina, Minnesota The preliminary geotechnical evaluation you authorized has been completed. The purpose of the evaluation was to assist the you and your design team, in evaluating existing site conditions for the possibilities of converting the Midwest Tennis Club building into a light commercial or industrial facility. A building addition or truck parking facilities are also being contemplated on the south side of the existing building, within the existing outdoor tennis courts. Summary of Results Five standard penetration test boring were completed to nominal depths of 20 feet below grade to evaluate the soils for a possible building addition. The general soil profile encountered in the borings consisted of about 2 1/2 to 12 feet of poorly graded sand and silty sand fill underlain by approximately 2 to 5 feet of peat and slightly organic clay (swamp deposits). Underlying the swamp deposits, the soil consisted of alluvial deposits of poorly graded sand and sandy lean clay. During the field work, groundwater was observed at depths of approximately 15 to 19 feet below the existing ground surface. We also cored the concrete floor slab at eight locations within the existing building to evaluate the concrete and soil conditions beneath the floor slab. The concrete cores showed slab thickness ranging from 2 1/2 inches to 4 1/4 inches. Compressive strengths of the cores exceeded 7,500 pounds per square inch (psi) The hand auger borings and DCP (Dynamic Cone Penetrometer) tests performed at the eight locations identified poorly graded sand with gravel to depths up to 3 feet below the floor slab. Based on the results of the hand augers and DCP tests, we estimated the (k) value of the floor subgrade at 300 pounds per square inch (pci) per inch of deflection. • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 CITY OF EDINA AV,.1.1 7023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 2 Summary of Recommendations The existing fill, loose sand and peat (swamp deposits) are likely not suitable for support of a commercial and/or industrial structure without some soil correction. If the area is to be used for a heavy parking area, most of the soils appear suitable for pavement support. The exceptions are along the west side of the outdoor courts (Borings ST-1 and ST-4) where the cap of fill over the peat may be too thin to support pavements. General Remarks Please refer to the attached report for a more detailed summary of our preliminary analyses and recommendations. If we can provide additional assistance, or observation and testing services during construction, please call Paul Gionfriddo at (952) 942-1777 or Henry Vloo at (952) 942-1779. Sincerely, Braun Intertec Corporation Paul S. Gionfriddo, PE Project Engineer 1(94 Henry Vloo, PE Associate - Senior Engineer Attachment: Geotechnical Evaluation Report georpt Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction 1 Al. Project 1 A.2. Purpose of This Evaluation 1 A.3. Scope 1 A.4. Documents Provided 2 A.5. Locations and Elevations 2 B. Results 2 B.1. Site Conditions 2 B.2. Boring Logs 2 B.3. Soils 3 13.4. Groundwater 3 B.5. Concrete Thickness and Compressive Strength Testing 4 C. Analyses and Recommendations 4 C.1. Proposed Construction 4 C.2. Discussion 4 C.3. Site Preparation — Building Addition(s) 5 C.4. Foundations 6 C.5. Floor 6 C.6. Exterior Slabs 7 C.7. Site Grading and Drainage 8 C.8. Pavements 8 D. Procedures 9 D.1. Drilling and Sampling 9 D.2. Soil Classification 9 D.3. Groundwater Observations 10 E. General Recommendations 10 E.1. Basis of Recommendations 10 E.2. Review of Design 10 E.3. Groundwater Fluctuations 10 E.4. Use of Report 11 E.5. Level of Care 11 Professional Certification Appendix: Boring and Coring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets ST-1 through ST-5 Compressive Strength Tests, Cores 1 through 8 Descriptive Terminology CITY OF EDINA AUG 11 ?n23 BRAUN INTERTEC Braun Inter-lac Corporation 6801 Woshingron Avertte S Minneapolis, MN 55439 Phone: 952.941.5600 Fox: 952.94i.d151 Web: brouninrertec.con CITY OF EDINA A. Introduction AUG 1 1 2023 A.1. Project PLANNING DEPARTMEN1 Hillcrest Development is evaluating the possibilities of converting the existing Midwest Tennis Club facility into a commercial or light industrial facility. The existing facility located at 7300 Bush Lake Road includes an approximate 52,400 square foot building, outdoor tennis courts and parking and drive areas. A building addition or heavy duty parking is also contemplated on the south side of the existing building, in the area of the outdoor courts. A.2. Purpose of This Evaluation The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation was to assist Hillcrest Development in evaluating the existing building floor slab and site soil conditions for converting the site to a commercial or light industrial facility. A.3. Scope Hillcrest Development requested soil borings, a concrete floor slab evaluation and a preliminary geotechnical evaluation report. Our scope of services was limited to: • staking the boring locations and determining ground surface elevations at the boring locations; • coordinating the locating of underground utilities near our boring locations; • conducting five penetration test borings, each to a nominal depth of 20 feet; • returning the samples to our laboratory for visual classification and logging by a geotechnical engineer; • coring the concrete floor at eight locations within the existing building; • observing the concrete reinforcing steel, if any; • measuring the core thickness; • compressive strength testing of the concrete core(s); • Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 CITY OF EDINA Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 AUG 1 1 2023 July 23, 2002 Page 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • submitting a preliminary geotechnical evaluation report containing logs of the borings, our analysis of the field tests, and recommendations for foundation or pavement support. A.4. Documents Provided We received a land survey drawing of the existing facility. The survey was completed by Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson, Inc., and was dated July 30, 1990. A.5. Locations and Elevations The borings were taken at the approximate locations shown on the attached sketch. The ground surface elevations at the boring locations were referenced to the floor slab of the existing Midwest Tennis Club building. The elevation of this reference was assumed to be 100.0 feet. The locations and elevations of the borings should be considered approximate. The borings on the attached sketch are identified as ST-1 through ST-5. The concrete cores on the sketch are identified as 1 through 8. B. Results B.1. Site Conditions The site is developed and occupied by an approximate 52,400 square foot building. The building contains indoor tennis courts, a lounge area and locker rooms. An approximately 19,920 square foot outdoor tennis court is located on the south side of the building. Bituminous-covered parking and drive areas are located on the east side of the building and outdoor courts. B.2. Boring Logs Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata, penetration resistances and groundwater observations are included in the Appendix. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and auger cuttings. It should be noted that the depths shown as changes between the strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions and the depths of the changes vary between the borings. Geologic origins presented for each stratum on the Log of Boring sheets are based on the soil types, blows per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history of the site. CITY OF EDINA Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 AUG 1 1 2023 July 23, 2002 Page 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Because of the complex glacial and post-glacial depositional environments, geologic origins are frequently difficult to ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of the site was not performed. B.3. Soils B.3.a. Soil Borings. Borings ST-1 through ST-5 encountered approximately 5 to 7 1/2 inches of bituminous pavement over 2 1/2 to 12 feet of silty sand, clayey sand and poorly graded sand fill over 2 to 5 feet of peat and slightly organic sandy lean clay (swamp deposits). Beneath the peat, the soil boring encountered silty sand, poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt and sandy lean clay to the termination depths of the borings at approximately 20 feet below the ground surface. B.3.b. Penetration Resistances. The penetration resistances in the surficial sand fill ranged from 8 to 43 blows per foot (BPF), indicating varying compaction. However, the higher blow counts are likely associated with gravel and cobbles within the fill soil. The penetration resistances in the underlying poorly graded sands and silty sand ranged from 3 to 30 BPF, indicating very loose to medium dense soil conditions. B.3.c. Hand Auger Borings. Soil encountered below the floor slab at the core locations within the building encountered poorly graded sand with gravel and silty sand with gravel to depths 1 to 3 feet below the floor slab. The hand auger borings encountered refusal in gravel at depths 1 to 3 feet below the floor slab. B.3.d. Penetration Resistances — DCP Results. The DCP results within the building area generally exceeded 25 blows per 6-inch increment. These blow counts generally indicate the soil was likely compacted to 95 percent or greater of its standard Proctor value and corresponds to medium dense soil conditions. Most of the DCPs met with refusal at approximately 1 1/2 to 2 feet below the floor slab in rocks/gravel. B.4. Groundwater Groundwater was observed at depths of 15 to 19 feet. While completing the soil borings, after the auger was withdrawn from the bore holes, water was not observed to cave-in depths of 13 to 16 1/2 feet. Groundwater levels are expected to fluctuate seasonally. CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 4 B.5. Concrete Thickness and Compressive Strength Testing Eight concrete cores were obtained from within the existing building. Each core was measured for nominal thickness and two of the cores were tested for compressive strength. Table 1 below summarizes the core thickness and compressive strength results. Compressive strength tests taken on the other six cores are not valid because the height to diameter ratio of the cores was less than 1.0. Table 1. Summary of Core Thickness Core Number Thickness (inches) Compressive Strength (psi) 1 3 1/4 --- 2 2 1/2 --- 3 3 1/4 --- 4 4 --- 5 4 1/4 7800 6 4 --- 7 3 3/4 7580 8 3 3/4 --- The compressive strength tests for the cores are attached to this report. C. Analyses and Recommendations C.1. Proposed Construction We understand Hillcrest Development is evaluating the possibilities of converting the existing facility into a commercial or light industrial facility. A building addition or heavy parking is also contemplated. C.2. Discussion We were not provided with a specific application for the existing building, i.e. commercial or industrial and we were also not provided with the anticipated floor slab loading(s). Our observations of the existing concrete floor slab showed slab thickness varying from approximately 2 1/2 inches to 4 1/4 inches. In addition, the wire mesh reinforcing was not always located within the concrete. The results of the field observations and tests were forwarded to CITY OF EDINA AUG 1.1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 5 located within the concrete. The results of the field observations and tests were forwarded to Meyer Borgman and Johnson, Inc. (MBJ), for further evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of the existing floor. A separate report was prepared by MBJ regarding this evaluation. The soil borings encountered fill over peat (swamp deposits) extending to depths approximately 4 to 17 feet below existing grades. The existing fill, loose sand and particularly the peat, are highly compressible and will consolidate under additional fill and building loads, resulting in detrimental settlement to the proposed structure. For this reason, we recommend soil corrections for any additions to the south side of the existing building. An excavate and refill to prepare the site for spread footings and slab-on-grade construction will likely be the most cost-effective solution for soil correction for a building addition. C.3. Site Preparation — Building Addition(s) C.3.a. Excavation. If the project includes construction of new addition(s), we recommend site preparation include complete removal of the topsoil, vegetative matter, old foundations, slabs, utilities, pavement, and other deleterious material. Likewise, the peat and organic clays (swamp deposits) should also be removed. The depth to remove the unsuitable soils will range from 5 to 17 feet at the boring locations. The excavations should be oversized to provide lateral stability for the backfill. The bottoms of the subexcavations should be oversized 1 foot beyond the edges of the footings for each foot of subexcavation below the bottoms of the footings (1:1 oversizing). Loosened soil in the bottoms of the excavations should be compacted prior to backfilling. C.3.b. Backfill and Fill. The silty sand, clayey sand and poorly graded sand fill identified in the soil borings appears to be reusable as fill material. If imported fill is needed, we recommend that the fill consist of granular material similar to the on site soils. The backfill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 12 inches in thickness, and each lift should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density determined in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 698 (standard Proctor). Holes created by demolition, if any, should also be properly backfilled and compacted as specified above. In green areas, the compaction may be reduced to 90 percent and in the upper 3 feet of pavement areas, it should be increased to 100 percent. If a soil bearing capacity greater than 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) is required, the minimum compaction requirements will need to be increased. Hillcrest Development CITY OF EDINA Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 AUG 1 1 2023 Page 6 !'LANNING DEPARTMENT C.4. Foundations C.4.a. Depth. We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 3 1/2 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately beneath the slab. Footings in unheated structures or screen walls should be placed a minimum of 5 feet below grade for frost protection. C.4.b. Bearing Pressure. If the fill has been placed as recommended above, it is our opinion that the footings may be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 2000 psf. C.4.c. Backfill. We recommend backfill be placed evenly on both the inside and outside of foundation walls. The fill placed on the exterior sides of the foundation walls should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density. Beneath steps, slabs and pavements, it should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent. Soils from the footing excavations may be used. Backfills should be brought up uniformly on both sides of the foundation walls to minimize displacement of the foundation walls. C.4.d. Settlement. We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 3/4 inch under the assumed loads. Buildings similar to the proposed buildings can generally tolerate settlement of this magnitude. Because settlement of the existing building has already occurred, differential settlement up to 1/2 inch could occur between the proposed addition and the existing building. We recommend either (1) installing expansion joints between the proposed addition and the existing building to accommodate this movement, or (2) dowelling the new foundations to the existing foundations to distribute the differential settlement. C.S. Floor C.5.a. Subgrade. After the building pad preparation has been completed, we anticipate the floor subgrade will be compacted fill. Backfill in footing and mechanical trenches should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. CITY OF EDINA AUG 11 2023 Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C.5.b. Vapor Barrier. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, or if moisture is a concern, we recommend a vapor retarder be placed beneath the slab. (Some coverings, coatings or situations may require a vapor barrier, i.e., a membrane with a permeance less than 0.3 perms.) Industry standards generally allow burying the vapor retarder or barrier beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage of the concrete, but this practice risks trapping water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. C.5.c. Subgrade Modulus. The anticipated floor subgrade is compacted fill. It is our opinion that a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 150 pounds per square inch per inch of deflection (pci) may be used to design the floor. If a minimum of 6 inches of compacted crushed gravel road base is placed immediately beneath the floor, it is our opinion that a modulus of 250 pci may be used to design the floor. The soils under the existing floor consists of compacted sand and gravel. It is our opinion that a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 300 pci could be used to evaluate the existing floor. C.6. Exterior Slabs We recommend any organic soils and/or topsoil be removed from beneath any exterior slabs. Fills and backfills should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density. The silty sand fill soil is frost-susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, frost heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance for slabs or steps in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to reduce this heave is to remove the frost-susceptible soils and replace them with nonfrost-susceptible sand or sandy gravel. Sand or sandy gravel with less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a number 200 sieve would be considered as nonfrost-susceptible. An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending about 4 feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying subgrade and thereby reduce heave. Six to 12 inches of granular material is generally placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Hillcrest Development OF EDINA Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 AU .1.12023 Page 8 FANNING DEPARTMENT C.7. Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide a positive runoff away from the proposed addition(s), if any. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the addition(s) and slabs be sloped to permit drainage away from the building. In addition, we recommend gutters and down spouts with long splash blocks or extensions be used to direct roof runoff away from the building. C.8. Pavements C.8.a. Excavation. If the area of the outdoor courts is used for heavy duty traffic, some soil correction work will be needed at boring location ST-4. In this area, only 2 1/2 feet of fill is covering the peat. We recommend that at least 4 feet of compacted fill be placed over the peat to assist in bridging the organic soil and provide support to the pavement. C.8.b. Proofroll. As a final check prior to placement of the aggregate base, we recommend the pavement area(s) be proofrolled. This precautionary measure will assist in detecting localized soft spots. Any soft spots noted during the proofrolling process may require additional subcuts, A qualified geotechnical engineer should observe the proofrolling process to make a final evaluation of the subgrade. C.8.c. Anticipated Subgrade. After the preparation, we anticipate the subgrade will consist of a mixture of sand, silty sand or clayey sand. The design should be based on the weakest soil, with an assumed R-value of 20 for the pavement design. C.8.d. Design Sections. For the above subgrade and the assumed traffic, we recommend the following pavement layer thicknesses for both the possible parking addition and reconstructed existing lots. CI-TY OF EDINA AU(; 1. 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Table 2. Recommended Minimum Thickness: Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 9 Course Car Parking (in.) Truck and Parking Drives (in.) Bituminous Wear 1 1/2 2 Bituminous Base 1 1/2 2 Gravel Base 8 12 Total 11 16 D. Procedures D.1. Drilling and Sampling The penetration test borings were performed on June 20, 2002, with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with 3 1/4-inch inside diameter hollow-stem auger. Sampling for the borings was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, "Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." Using this method, we advanced the bore hole with the hollow-stem auger to the desired test depth. A 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches was then used to drive the standard 2-inch split-barrel sampler a total penetration of 1 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow-stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration were recorded and are an index of soil strength characteristics. Samples were taken at 5-foot vertical intervals to the termination depths of the borings. A representative portion of each sample was then sealed in a glass jar. D.2. Soil Classification Soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures)." A summary of the ASTM classification system is included in the Appendix. All samples were then returned to our laboratory for review of the field classifications by a geotechnical engineer. Representative samples will remain in our office for a period of 30 days to be available for your examination. These samples will then be discarded unless we are notified in writing to retain them longer. Cc-FY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT D.3. Groundwater Observations Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 10 Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottoms of the borings, the holes were probed through the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater. Soil borings were immediately backfilled after drilling. E. General Recommendations E.1. Basis of Recommendations The preliminary analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Often, variations occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which do not become evident until additional exploration or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations of this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs, and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program for the site preparation phase of this project. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings, and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. E.2. Review of Design This report is based on the preliminary design of the proposed additions as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications. With the review, we will evaluate whether any changes in design have affected the validity of the recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. E.3. Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level observations in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. These data were interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short, and fluctuation in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. Hillcrest Development Project CMXX-02-0266 July 23, 2002 Page 11 E.4. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Hillcrest Development and their design team to use to design the proposed structure and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. E.5. Level of Care Services performed by Braun Intel-tee Corporation personnel for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. CITY OF EDINA AUG 1 1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT A6,3. it 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Appendix CITY OF EDINA AUG 1.1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BORING AND CORING LOCATION SKETCH MIDWEST RAOUET CLUB 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD EDINA, MINNESOTA BRAUN" INTERTEC DATE INT z 7-24-02 DRAWN BY: BJB APED BY: HV 7-24-02 0 JOB NO. CMXX-02-0266 or DWO. NO. MX20266 SHEET SCALE 1" = 60' Q O APPIR8XIMATiSITE 20' 0 60' 11 SCALE I" = 60' & DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA MV 1 AUG 1.1 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3 DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CORE SAMPLES yU RI BRAUW LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project CMXX-02-0266 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Midwest Racquet Club 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, Minnesota BORING: ST-1 LOCATION: See attached sketch. DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 6/20/02 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 100.3 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL :+: FILL: 6 inches Bituminous over Poorly Graded Sand with Benchmark: Floor slab at south _ ••••• 4+ v.* Silt, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist. _ side of garage door = 100.0. - 97.8 2.5 •+: Ct• 1 8 _ FILL ',.• FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, black, moist. 4.: 96.3 4.0 4+ PT `-z : PEAT, black, moist to wet. _ !f. (Swamp Deposit) 9 t_!z 0 P 93.3 os 7.0 '' SC- j'" SILTY CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist. X _ SM (Alluviumn) A 8 -• 91.3 a 9.0 ) ''/.- = ci SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to SM coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist to C 13 q waterbearing, medium dense. L -0,- (Alluvium) - 0 :r3 v X 26 .. - x _ _ i An open triangle in the water CITY OF EDINA ___ 30 V level (WL) column indicates 5' lt - the depth at which groundwater _ - was observed while drilling. AUG I I 2023 Groundwater levels fluctuate. 3 — _ — 3 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ 20.5 13 79.8 - END OF BORING. - i - Water down 15 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. - _ Water not observed to cave-in depth of 13 1/2 feet ; - — immediately after withdrawal of auger. - Boring immediately backfilled. _ - - _ CMXX-02-0266 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-1 page 1 of 1 0 8 O BRAUN' LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project CMXX-02-0266 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Midwest Racquet Club 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, Minnesota BORING: ST-2 LOCATION: See attached sketch. DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 6/20/02 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 99.4 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL to. FILL: 5 inches Bituminous over Aggregate Base. 98.4 1.0 ;St FILL •.4: FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine-grained, with a + trace of Gravel, brown, moist. 4:44. t * •••• v. .., X*: + 0 .0 — •::f v.. w • •• • •••• ••••• P_ •:•:e .. . ... 21 n , d ••:*: ••••• o _ 4+ •4 • g 12.0 V, * ••••••• ••••• +4;••• sk 0 v.* 44 •••••* 17 — 11 xt74` — o 87.4 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, slightly organic, with layers of 5 - tm %Peat, black, wet, rather soft. (Swamp Deposit) I— > — 82.4 17.0 / W < cv, I— SP- c POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to 22 C,I Z CC El 2 < SM coarse-grained, with lenses of Silt and Gravel, brown, waterbearing, medium dense. W 0_ Ti w (Alluvium) LL -. 0 , .1 0 29 >- c_v 0 78.9 20.5 • I— F_ END OF BORING. 0 Z Z Water down 16 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in — < _I 0_ the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 13 feet — immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled. CMXX-02-0266 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-2 page I of I a. CM pN O It fzA a . rA BRAINS" LOG OF BORING I NTERTEC Braun Project CMXX-02-0266 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Midwest Racquet Club 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, Minnesota BORING: ST-3 LOCATION: See attached sketch. DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autoharnmer DATE: 6/20/02 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 99.8 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL :.; FILL: 7 1/2 inches Bituminous over Poorly Graded Sand _ ••••, so with Silt, brown, moist. 4. 97.8 2.0 to FILL .:.: FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to I/ 14 - 4.• medium-grained, dark brown to black, moist, loose to ri :•:• medium dense. I — :44 ••••• ...44• 8 A i• 2 0 ss• •... e 0 _ 4:4 ...:. 'el 20 .6 90.8 9.0 • • • • I 0 0 1:7 a i PT ! ! PEAT, black, moist to wet. (Swamp Deposit) r'5 A 2 , _ `. • 'd<., !. :9; 87.8 12.0 86.8 13.0 CL p 74 SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of Fibers, gray, wet, ii medium. 7 Y SP- \ (Alluvium) i - SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist to I waterbearing, medium dense to dense. A 13 - (Alluvium) SZ _ 1. 3 - _ I A 35 79.3 20.5 1— _ END OF BORING. Z W - Water down 16 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in < ro 1-- _ the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 13 feet Z 0,1 cc E 2 < w o_ ,-1 w - immediately after withdrawal of auger. 0 '—/ a C..7 0 — Boring immediately backfilled. = Z — _ 0_ 5 `r 2 z < -J CMXX-02-0266 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-3 page 1 of 1 Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) WL BPF Tests or Notes ASTM Symbol Elev. Depth feet feet 100.3 0.0 2.5 97.8 95.8 4.5 7.0 93.3 79.8 20.5 Braun Project CMXX-02-0266 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Midwest Racquet Club 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, Minnesota BORING: ST-4 LOCATION: See attached sketch. DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: 6/20/02 SCALE: 1" = 4' FILL FILL: 7 1/2 inches Bituminous over Poorly Graded Sand, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist. PEAT, black, moist to wet. (Swamp Deposit) PT SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with a trace of Gravel, black, moist, very loose. (Alluvium) SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, dark brown, moist, loose. (Alluvium) CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, black, wet, soft. (Alluvium) 12.0 POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist to waterbearing, very loose to medium dense. (Alluvium) 1 SP- SM x 91.3 9.0 88.3 SP- SM 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Cc) O N CITY OF EDINA END OF BORING. Water down 17 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 13 1/2 feet 8 immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring immediately backfilled. oG BRAUN' LOG OF BORING INTERTEC CMXX-02-0266 Braun Intertec Corporation 51-4 page 1 of BRAUN' LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project CMXX-02-0266 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Midwest Racquet Club 7300 Bush Lake Road Edina, Minnesota BORING: ST-5 LOCATION: See attached sketch. DRILLER: Scott McLean METHOD: 3 1/4" USA Autohammer DATE: 6/20/02 SCALE: I" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 99.3 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) - 97.8 1.5 FILL ***** •••• +: AS FILL: 4 inches Bituminous over Aggregate Base. - _ FILL :4.• FILL: Silty Clayey Sand with Gravel, brown and black, •••••••• ••••• •:•:. moist. 13 ••:*: 44 * / 36 g 0 - > E I n a :•:' 44 ..4. 4.. * a ..... •• _ - X 43 4+ 00 89.8 9.5 I I A , t Vt: FILL A :•:. .. FILL: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine-grained, moist. 13 I--- Z 2 0 brown,_. %-- v •::$ • ::$ - LU :.c.): 87.3 12.0 < cs-) 1-- g .- 2.i - R PT 1-f- ..z .'1 L. I PEAT, black, moist to wet. (Swamp Deposit} - 1 X 7 7 Z E LL >-I_ c•-.1 Er 2 < N Q.. ,I w r- • .1 0 c_o 0 = Z -' !z :I — ! u-- 6 . Z Z 3 82.3 17.0 i: < a SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to y 13 _ SM ' • medium-grained, brown, moist to waterbearing, medium _L) i dense. 1 20.5 , (Alluvium) - 12 2 78.8 END OF BORING. _ _ Water down 19 feet with 19 feet of hollow-stem auger in - the ground. _ Water not observed to cave-in depth of 16 1/2 feet - — immediately after withdrawal of auger. - Boring immediately backfilled. —' - - - _ - _ _ - CMXX-02-0266 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-5 page I of 1 30' 60' CITY OF EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1" = 60' S DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING al DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CORE SAMPLES BORING AND CORING LOCATION SKETCH MIDWEST RAQUET CLUB 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD EDINA, MINNESOTA BRAUN INTERTEC APPR.OXIMATESITE ► ~• • ► \• AUG 1 1 2023 'ON 38C10I3 DRAWN BY: BJB APID'D BY: HV JOB NO. CMXX-02-0266 INT 7-24-02 7-24-02 DATE DWG. NO. MX20266 SCALE 1" = 60' SHEET OF DATE: 9/6/2023 TO: 7300 Bush Lake Rd, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Ben Jore, PE, Senior Project Engineer RE: (7300 Bush Lake Rd.) – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil and survey drawings dated 8/11/2023 Review Comment Required For General 1. Existing easements held by the City require Council action to vacate if deemed appropriate and necessary for the project. Consideration of requests can require up to 60-days to process. General Comment 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. General Comment 4. A public access easement will be required for the new 8-ft sidewalk located on private property. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 5. An existing and proposed site condition survey has been provided. Grading/Building Permit 5.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 6. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 7. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 8. The proposed 8-ft sidewalk with a boulevard is supported. See note above for easement requirements. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 9. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 10. Provide traffic study and implement City-approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 11. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 12. Roadway was reconstructed in 2018 (mill and overlay). Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 542. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 13. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 14. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 15. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 16. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 16.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 16.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 17. No Disconnected sanitary and water services as there is no existing structures. N.A. 18. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 19. Water service connection to be shown on utility plan. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 20. Watermain was constructed in 1966 and the building was constructed in 1978. There is likely no well located on the property. N.A. Storm Water Utility 21. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 22. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 23. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 24. Site drains to structural flooding issues. Provide calculations demonstrating compliance with city permit requirements. Water Resources Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 25. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Erosion control plan has been submitted. Additional review to be completed. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 26. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 27. No Retaining walls proposed. N.A. Other Agency Coordination 28. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 29. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Date: September 13, 2023 To: Cary Teague – Community Development Director Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering Cc: 7300 Bush Lake Rd Owner and Development Team From: Andrew Scipioni – Transportation Planner Re: 7300 Bush Lake Road – Transportation Review Invicta, LLC is proposing to construct a new 10,240-square-foot hockey training facility at 7300 Bush Lake Road, adjacent to the Minnesota Made Ice Center. Stantec completed a traffic impact study (TIS) for this project on behalf of the City. This memo will review the findings of the TIS and other transportation impacts of the proposed development. Trip Generation Stantec determined existing traffic volumes through counts at the subject intersections. Existing volumes were then increase by 1% per year to determine 2025 No-Build conditions. To determine 2025 Build conditions, Stantec calculated trip generation estimates based on “detailed facility user information provided by the project owner,” which indicated a maximum of 20 facility users and 5 employees on-site at on time. This analysis concluded that the project will add 125 total daily trips, with 27 occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 52 occurring during the p.m. peak hour. Capacity Analysis Five intersections adjacent to the site were studied by Stantec (see Figure 1). All intersections currently operate at Level of Service A during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, and are expected to continue operating at LOS A through the 2025 Build and No Build scenarios. The added trips are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding streets, and no improvements are needed to accommodate the additional traffic. Parking Analysis 31 surface parking stalls are proposed for this site. City Code requires a minimum of one parking stall per 400 square feet of building space, or 26 spaces for this project. This project site will have a shared access agreement for shared parking with the adjacent Minnesota Made Ice Center, which has 219 parking stalls. Stantec evaluated parking demand using national data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition. Based on this analysis, the peak parking demand for both facilities is 116 stalls. The existing and proposed number of parking stalls is sufficient to accommodate this demand and exceeds City requirements. Figure 1: Study Intersections Multi-Modal Facilities There are currently no pedestrian or bicycle facilities adjacent to 7300 Bush Lake Rd. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2018) recommends new shared-use paths on Dewey Hill Rd, Bush Lake Rd and W 74th St, and a new bike lane on Bush Lake Rd south of the site. None of these facilities are proposed for construction in the current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. The project proposes to construct a new 8’ boulevard-style sidewalk along Bush Lake Rd. There are no transit stops immediately adjacent to the site. The Cahill District is served by Metro Transit Local Routes 6 and 540, which provide access to Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis. Both routes have stops located at the intersection of Dewey Hill Rd and Bush Lake Rd, less than a tenth of a mile away from the site. Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Table 1 details the ways in which the proposed redevelopment supports current City transportation plans and policies. Table 1: Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Comprehensive Plan (2018) Goal Assessment 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses with a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and neighborhood quality of life and emphasize methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Staff recommends installing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations for a minimum of 5% (2 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (4 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. EV charging stations should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high- performance transit service and connections. The applicant should consider providing directional signage/information for local transit service or subsidizing transit passes for visitors and employees (see Travel Demand Management Policy below). 7. Develop and manage parking provisions to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride- sharing and bicycle parking. The traffic impact study notes that this site will have a shared access agreement for shared parking with Minnesota Made Ice Center. Two (2) surface bike parking stalls are required per Section 36-1274 of City Code. These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing for surface and underground bike storage should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). 9. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. Turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles should be reviewed by the applicant. Steps should be taken to minimize the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle movement through the site (additional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.) 13. Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadway adjacent to community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. Living Streets Plan (2015) Principle Assessment 2. Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. The project provides accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 4. The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. The project includes a perimeter sidewalk that could connect to future facilities in the area, as well as internal sidewalk that connect to the Minnesota Made Ice Center. Travel Demand Management Policy (2021) Proposed Strategies (Tier 2 – min. 3 unique strategies identified) • Provide information on adjacent pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities • Provide information on starting/joining commuter programs • Provide surface bike parking exceeding City requirements Suggested Additional Strategies • Subsidize Metro Transit passes for tenants and employees !" # $" %& '( ! )**"+ , +-"*$."+ &+-& . / 0 . / 0 0 1 23 (4( , 23 (4( , 1 56 7 8 56 9:: % 5 6 * ; ; !< ; 6 $ 3 = / % % ! 6 * = % ! % * 7 % ; > 6 EdinaMN.gov7250-7300 Bush Lake RoadSite Plan Review Site Location 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road North Façade West Façade Zoning Site Future Land Use Site Site ConditionsStreet View Looking West Site Conditions Looking WestLooking North Site Conditions Looking EastLooking South Site Plan Exterior RenderingsEntry View from Southeast Exterior RenderingsEntry View from Northeast Exterior RenderingsStreet View from Southeast Exterior RenderingsStreet View from Northeast Exterior RenderingsStreet View from Northeast Exterior RenderingsStreet View from Northeast Code Compliance Table Pyramid of Discretion Staff Recommendation Recommend the City Council approve the Site Plan request based on the findings and conditions in the staff report. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-66 APPROVING A SITE PLAN AT 7250-7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.00 Minnesota Made Hockey currently operates an ice hockey training center on the property at 7250-7300 Bush Lake Road. The site is 5.55 acres and contains an existing 63,311 square foot building containing two ice rinks and assorted support space. 1.01 Sperides Reiners Architects, on behalf of the property owner, has proposed to construct a new 10,240 square foot training facility on the southern portion of the lot. The proposed building is 64’ x 160’ and would include a turf area, weight training, and other hockey specific training space. The existing 63,311 square foot building would remain. 1.03 To accommodate the request the following is required: Site Plan Review. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Metro U.S. Construction Subdivision, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1.05 On September 13, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Motion to approve with conditions passed unanimously. 1.06 On October 3, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed site plan is in compliance with City Code. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan based on the findings above and subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-66 Page 2 1. The Plan must be consistent with the Plans included in the September 13, 2023, Planning Commission packet. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment and ground level equipment must be screened per Section 36- 1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 8. Separation between the building and parking lot must be at least 10 feet. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the engineering and transportation memos dated September 6 & 13, 2023. 10. Any signage shall comply with the regulations of Article XIII in Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-66 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 17, 2023. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting October 17, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk ! "# $ %# &'! () ! " *++# ,#+%-# ',' ! - .! / ! - .! / / 0 12 )3) 4 12 )3) 4 0 56 7 8 ! 56 9:: & ! 5 6 + ; ; ! "< ; 6 % ! ! 2 = . & & " 6 + = & " & !+ ! 7 ! & ; > ! ! ! 6 City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 1 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire The City of Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the community. To help achieve these goals, developers seeking City approval must complete this form as part of their their zoning application. Upon receipt of this form, please email Sustainability Division lead, Grace Hancock, GHancock@edinamn.gov, to set up a time to walk through the form and discuss sustainable building strategies. Please email the completed form to Cary Teague, CTeague@edinamn.gov, and copy Grace Hancock. Development Address: 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD Developmer Applicant Name: SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS Date: 10/5/2023 Is the development seeking a PUD or City financing? See Sustainable Buildings Policy if so Topics Answers Yes or No Brief Description Sustainable Design & Energy Consumption Will you utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance or Energy Efficient Buildings, and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? NOT YET DETERMINED Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals? NO Will the building be LEED certified? NO Will all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified? YES Will water heaters be electric or natural gas? GAS Will building heat be powered by electricity or natural gas? ELECT Will different strategies to conserve energy (beyond those required by code) be included? If so, please describe YES PRECAST CONCRETE WALL PANELS HAVE A SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER R-VALUE (28.2) THAN REQUIRED BY CODE Will there be renewable energy such as solar or wind be generated on site? NO Will the project include a geothermal system? NO Will the completed project subscribe to a community solar program or other renewable energy program? NO Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? NO Comments: Managing Storm Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 90.3% BEFORE 40.3% AFTER What new surfaces will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) NONE City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 2 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Will a green roof be included on the new structure to assist in storm water retention? NO Will rain gardens or similar features be included on site to filter and retain the storm water? YES Comments: Landscaping Features to Manage Air Quality and Heat Island Effect Will existing healthy trees be protected and saved? YES What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? <1% BEFORE 11.7% AFTER Will you meet the current tree preservation and planting ordinance? YES Will shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code? NO Will native plantings be used in the landscaping? YES Will landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties? NO Will future owners and managers be trained in methods to avoid harmful chemicals being used on landscaping? YES Comments: Managing Construction Waste Will demolition of existing structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? NO DEMOLITION Will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse? Example, timber, steel, asphalt, cabinets, etc. NO DEMOLITION Are scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled? YES Are workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use? YES Comments: Managing Operational Waste Will a recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? NOT APPLICABLE Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? NOT APPLICABLE Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices? NOT APPLICABLE City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 3 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Comments: Managing Water Consumption Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? NO Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding conservation of water? NO Will outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? NO Comments: Sustainable Transportation Features Is the site accessible by public transit within ½ mile? YES Are site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines. YES If there is no public transit within ½ mile, is the project providing features to help bridge the distance to allow flexibility to use public transit? NOT APPLICABLE Is bike parking available near the main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? YES Is bike parking and a shower facility provided for employees? NO PROVIDED IN ADJACENT FACILITY Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners, guests or customers to use? NO Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? NO Updated June 2022 Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance 2023-18: Amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance 2023-18 amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction and grant second reading. INTRODUCTION: This ordinance proposal reflects EEC recommendations, and removal of originally proposed section "3b" pertaining to the requirement for merchants to contract for plastic film recycling, which has been deemed by staff inordinately burdensome due to the limited plastic film recycling supply chain in Minnesota. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance 2023-18: Carryout Bag Fee Staff Report: Ordinance No. 2023-18: Carryout Bag Fee Reference: June 2023 Public Input Summary Report Reference: Feb 2023 EEC Report Reference: July 2023 Staff Report Reference: Sep 2023 Legal Review 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING MERCHANT CARRYOUT BAG REDUCTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Article 14 to read as follows: ARTICLE 14. CARRYOUT BAGS PROVIDED BY MERCHANTS TO CUSTOMERS Section 1. Findings and Purpose. For the promotion of health, safety, order, convenience and general welfare of the public, the City finds that disposable carryout bag production and pollution pose a threat to our land, water, and air on a local, regional, and global scale. The purpose of this Article is to reduce this threat by reducing the use of fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions from disposable carryout bags, meeting City Climate Action Plan goals related to waste reduction and elimination of petroleum-based single-use products in Edina, and inspiring merchant and consumer behavior change. Section 2. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Carryout bag means a paper, plastic, or similar bag that is provided by a merchant at the check- out stand, cash register, point of sale, or other point of departure to a customer for the purpose of transporting food or merchandise out of the establishment. Carryout bags include: (1) plastic bags; (2) Compostable plastic bags; (3) Paper bags; and (4) Reusable bags Carryout bags do not include: (1) Produce and bulk good bags; (2) Baked goods bags; (3) Dry cleaning bags; 2 (4) Newspaper and doorhanger bags; (5) Secondhand bags; (6) Flower wrap bags; (7) Prescription drug bags; (8) Bags brought by a customer; and (9) Bags used as prepared packaging for retail goods Merchant means any person, corporation, partnership, business venture, public sports or entertainment facilities, street vendor or vendor at public events or festivals or organizations that sell or provide merchandise, goods, or materials including, without limitation, clothing, beverages, household goods, or personal items of any kind directly to a customer. This includes entities that meet the definition of “retail” and “food establishment” as defined by Edina City Code. Food banks and other food assistance programs are not considered to be merchants for the purposes of this section. Pass-through charge means a charge to be collected by merchants from their customers when providing carryout bags, and retained by merchants to be used at their discretion. Point-of-sale system means a cash register, credit card machine, or other device that can be programmed or is capable of being used to itemize purchases including a description and/or cost for each item, which can calculate sales tax, add applicable fees, or which is capable of generating sale reports. Section 3. Carryout bag requirements. (a) Merchants shall collect a pass-through charge of not less than five (5) cents for each carryout bag provided to customers. It shall be a violation of this section for any merchant to pay or otherwise reimburse a customer for any portion of the pass- through charge. All merchants shall indicate on the customer transaction receipt the number of carryout bags provided and the total amount of the pass-through charge. Merchants may use the revenue from the five-cent charge at their discretion. (b) Merchants offering plastic carryout bags must provide for the on-site collection of plastic bag recycling, co-located with garbage containers. a. If garbage receptacles are available to customers, then receptacles for separate plastic bag recycling must also be made available to customers in the same location. 3 b. If garbage receptacles are not available to customers and are instead placed in areas for use by staff only, then receptacles for separate plastic bag recycling are only required in those locations. c. Merchant shall arrange for the collection of plastic bag recycling by a licensed solid waste collector for delivery to an appropriate transfer station or processing facility. (b) Merchants shall provide, upon annual request by the City, a report identifying the number and value of the carryout bag fees charged to customers. Section 4. Exceptions. Merchants are not required to collect a pass-through charge from anyone with a voucher or electronic benefits card issued under the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) or Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) support programs, or the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as Basic Food), or a recognized Minnesota food assistance program. Section 5. Exemptions. The charge shall not apply when the merchant is a government agency. Section 6. Enforcement. The City shall have the duty and the authority to enforce provisions of this chapter pursuant to City Code Chapter 1, Sec. 1-18. Section 7. Effective Date. July 1, 2024. First Reading: October 3, 2023 Second Reading: October 17, 2023 Published: Attest __________________________ _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current - Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk October 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Ordinance 2023-18: Amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction Information / Background: Action Requested: 1. Approve Ordinance No. 2023-18 and grant second reading. 2. Direct staff at what level to enforce ordinance, if approved (proactive enforcement or on complaint) Discussion: Council asked the following questions at the October 3rd first reading of Ordinance 2023-18. Public Health and Sustainability staff compiled information to address these questions and facilitate a productive 2nd reading discussion: Is there a public health concern if a customer wants to transport takeout food using their own bag to avoid a fee? o There are inherent risks in transporting prepared food like food spillage, leakage, or touching very hot food and drink. However, since bags are not prohibited and shoppers can still pay a fee to receive a carryout bag, Public Health staff’s opinion is that there is not a public health concern if a customer wants to transport carryout food in their own bag. Is there a public health concern related to excluding grocery produce bags from the carryout bag fee? o Most produce holds little risk in cross-contamination, even when purchased “loose,” or purchased without packaging in a produce bag. However, produce bags are used for a wide array of grocery activities by customers, like to wrap raw meat products and protect from cross-contamination. For this reason, Public Health staff’s opinion is that produce bags should continue to be excluded from a carryout bag fee. Continuing to exclude produce bags from the carryout bag fee would also keep Edina’s proposed ordinance consistent with the City of Minneapolis’, where many Edina customers also shop and many Edina businesses also operate. What potential issues do staff see with the proposed requirement that merchants offering plastic bags supply onsite plastic bag recycling, particularly with restaurants and the risk of recycling contamination through food residue on bags? STAFF REPORT Page 2 o Public Health staff’s opinion is that there is a high risk of contamination in the plastic film recycling stream if restaurants are required to collect used plastic bags. If this provision is approved, staff recommends that restaurants be exempted. o Beyond the contamination concern, Public Health staff’s opinion is that the supply chain for plastic film (bag) recycling is not robust enough to support hundreds of small contracts, if all regulated merchants complied with this proposed requirement. Currently, there are only two contractors in the Twin Cities who can pick up plastic film and deliver it to film recycling plants. o Staff recommend removing provision 3b related to offering plastic bag recycling due to supply chain constraints and risk of contamination. The ordinance proposal for this second reading has been updated to reflect this requirement. What are the financial impacts to City operations to fully implement and proactively enforce this ordinance proposal? o Estimated $25,000 - The equivalent of 1 full-time staff person’s work for 1 quarter would be required to launch an ordinance of this kind. Possible solutions include using existing staff time or hiring a consultant for the following activity: Develop merchant roster for permit allocation, outreach and reporting o The estimated $25,000 investment needed to develop a merchant roster for outreach and reporting would require a budget adjustment to allocate new funding from the general tax levy to Public Health. o Estimated $120K - One new full time staff would be needed to fully implement and proactively enforce this ordinance proposal long-term. Activities would include: Create new general business permit to operationalize proactive inspection and ordinance enforcement Staff notes that a flat fee permit and associated administrative costs of compliance will likely impact smaller businesses disproportionately. Follow up with merchants who have not complied with new permit requirement. Inspect more than 400 businesses annually for compliance (majority of this FTE’s time) Manage penalty process for non-compliant merchants Maintain merchant roster for outreach and reporting Receive complaints from shoppers regarding non-compliant merchants Answer merchant questions and provide resources to comply (resources to be developed as part of awareness campaign) Manage annual Merchant report request by developing report template, notification, submittal and data analysis process. o Total cost for full implementation and proactive enforcement: $145K in year one, $120K ongoing. What are the financial impacts to City operations to administer this ordinance in a limited capacity, and avoid enforcement action except through educational resources shared on complaint? o At the first reading, Sustainability staff described the activities that City Operations would expect to undertake to administer, but not enforce, this ordinance. These activities include: Estimated $25,000 - The equivalent of 1 full-time staff person’s work for 1 quarter would be required to launch an ordinance of this kind. Possible solutions include using existing staff time or hiring a consultant for the following activity: Develop merchant roster for outreach and reporting Estimated $15K – 10% of existing staff’s time would need to be permanently allocated away from organics recycling administration to this role. Activities would include: Maintain merchant roster for outreach and reporting Receive complaints from shoppers regarding non-compliant merchants and follow up with merchants to share educational materials STAFF REPORT Page 3 Answer merchant questions and provide resources to comply (resources to be developed as part of awareness campaign) Manage annual Merchant report request by developing report template, notification, submittal and data analysis process. o Total cost for limited ordinance administration: $40K in year one, $15K ongoing. o The estimated $25,000 investment needed to develop a merchant roster for outreach and reporting would require a budget adjustment to allocate new funding from the general tax levy to Public Health. o Public Health staff’s opinion is that administering this ordinance in this limited capacity is feasible with current staff resources. Edina’s Organics Recycling Coordinator could be temporarily reassigned to help implement this program, but would need to expand job duties to include this program on a permanent basis. Does the City have a legal pathway to recover some or all of the fee revenue accrued by merchants? o No. Additional legal review resulted in the following findings: Fee revenue cannot be collected from everyone in the city or it will be deemed a tax; new taxes must be approved by the State Legislature. The City can issue new licenses to regulated entities at a cost to these regulated entities, but it cannot withhold these licenses for non-compliance since doing so would violate the State’s “ban on bag bans.” Retailers must be allowed to offer bags and could not be stopped by revocation of their City license related to this requirement, otherwise the City’s action would violate state law. Nor is it advisable for the City to increase the cost of existing licenses on existing entities that might offer bags, since that would only affect restaurants (which are licensed by the City), but not retail or grocery stores (which are not licensed by the City). o The only legal pathway for the City to cover the cost of this ordinance proposal is to raise the tax levy to cover the cost of administration. What difference could this ordinance contribute to progress on Edina’s climate action goals? o Expected benefit: other communities have seen demonstrable reductions in contamination rates for curbside recycling when a bag fee has been implemented. When carryout bags are free, people “wish-cycle” with their carryout bags. o Potential benefits: Small behavior changes can lead to larger ones. On its own, a bag fee has limited impact on greenhouse gas reductions or solid waste reductions, but there is qualitative evidence in other communities that a small behavior change can lead to more material changes like increased recycling and organics recycling rates, and lower consumption of single-use goods. When people are aware that they are paying extra for a plastic bag, it inherently has more utility, and they are more likely to repurpose it for things like trash can liners and dog poop pickup. This reduces the need to purchase this specialized type of bag separately. Microplastics are a contaminant of emerging concern in Minnesota; it’s logical to expect that reduced carryout bag use would reduce microplastics in Minnesota waterways to some degree. o Unlikely benefits: A bag fee, on its own, will not reduce solid waste in Edina, since customers can still opt to purchase a carryout bag. Conclusion The Council has three options before it this evening: STAFF REPORT Page 4 Option 1 (full enforcement) – Approve Ordinance 2023-18 and agree to fund full implementation and proactive enforcement of ordinance requirements via a general tax levy increase, estimated at $145K in year 1, $120K ongoing. Option 2 (limited administration) - Approve Ordinance 2023-18 and allow a mid-term budget adjustment to fund one-time $25K ordinance launch costs. Option 3 – Do not approve Ordinance 2023-18, and do not require that merchants collect a pass- through fee of $0.05 for carryout bags. Appendix: Ordinance 2023-18 (excluding initial “3b” proposal) Summer 2023 public input summary, from businesses 1 City of Edina Potential Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Community Engagement Summary Report June 5, 2023 Prepared by Ann Tennes, President, Ann Tennes Communications, LLC Project Overview In early 2023, the Edina City Council (Council) directed staff to draft an ordinance proposal requiring that all City of Edina merchants, including retail establishments and restaurants, charge a minimum $0.05 fee to customers for all carryout bags. The potential ordinance is envisioned to: ● Require that merchants charge a minimum $0.05 for all carryout bags, regardless of bag material ● Allow the retail establishment or restaurant to keep the fee for use at their discretion ● Require businesses to report to the City annually the quantity and type of carryout bags purchased and distributed customers as well as the fee amount collected This initiative follows Council’s 2022 approved work plan initiative for Edina's resident volunteer Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) to “Revise and update EEC’s 2017 report on possible recommendations for a plastic bag ordinance” with a deliverable of an “updated report with recommendation.” The potential carryout bag fee ordinance meets several goals established in the City’s Climate Action Plan approved in December 2021, including: ● Strategy WM 1: Decrease total per-capita municipal solid waste handled 5% by 2030, in part by: ○ WM 1-5: Eliminate petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plastics, including plastic bags, by 2025 On February 7, 2023, the EEC recommended to Council that "...the City require that merchants charge a $.05 fee to customers for carryout bags. EEC asks Council to direct staff to write an ordinance that updates City Code to include this requirement and implement an outreach plan to inform residents and businesses of this requirement." Council received this recommendation and directed staff to draft an ordinance and seek public feedback. During April and May 2023, City staff sought broad-based public feedback from Edina residents and businesses regarding the potential carryout bag fee ordinance. This report provides a summary of the community engagement methods employed to elicit public feedback and the responses, opinions and suggestions received from the Edina community. 2 Community Engagement Outreach Methods and Promotion City Sustainability Manager Grace Hancock and project consultant Ann Tennes, President, Ann Tennes Communications, LLC, employed the following public feedback outreach methods during April and May 2023: ● Better Together Edina webpage to share information on the potential carryout bag fee: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/carryout-bag-ordinance ● Online survey modules created and linked from the Better Together Edina project webpage ○ Posted from April 14 through May 15 ○ Initial survey question sorted respondents into either resident, visitor or business modules ● Virtual roundtable discussions scheduled on May 5, 10 and 11 ● One-on-one interviews with Edina business leaders, owners, managers and corporate representatives City staff promoted the availability of these public feedback opportunities through the following outreach platforms: ● Print ad featured on page two of the May 2023 Edition: Edina ● Virtual ads featured in the Edina Chamber of Commerce weekly e-newsletter and both the Edina Rotary and Morningside Rotary Club weekly e-newsletters ● CivicPlus email to Sustainability newsletter subscribers ● Video segment featured in the early May Agenda: Edina video ● Social media posts featured across City channels Community Engagement Results Following is a summary of the participation in and public feedback received from each community engagement method: Better Together Edina site Between April 14 and May 30, the project page received 994 views. 555 visitors interacted with some part of the project page (clicking on a link, downloading a document), and 215 visitors engaged with the survey tool. Surveys Between April 14 and May 15, a total of 201 residents, five business representatives and four visitors responded to the surveys linked from the Better Together Edina website. The responses are summarized in this report, and the entire data sets, with respondent identification information removed, are attached. (Exhibits 1, 2, 3) 3 Resident Responses - Executive Summary In general, Edina residents responding to the online survey did not favor a carryout bag fee, with some support for a voluntary fee and less support for a mandatory carryout bag fee requirement. Residents expressed a desire for expansion to weekly recycling collection, concerns about a carryout bag fee being government overreach and the need for the City to focus more on waste reduction from apartments and schools. Of the three residents who signed up for the virtual roundtable discussions, two were generally in favor but had specific questions, and one was opposed. Clearly, the online survey was the most effective method of eliciting opinions from Edina residents. Resident Responses - Online Survey 1. How Residents Currently Interact with Carryout Bags ● Survey question: How often do you reuse carryout bags, if at all? Examples include: plastic bags for trash liners, paper bags for recycling, etc. ○ Possible answers: ■ Never ■ Rarely ■ Sometimes ■ Very Often ■ Always ○ How Edina residents answered: ● Highest incidence of reuse as indicated by ‘Always’ response ○ Brown paper bags - 47 percent ○ Plastic bags - 29 percent ○ Reusable bags - 28 percent ● Lowest incidence of reuse as indicated by ‘Never’ response ○ Compostable bags - 29 percent ○ Reusable bags (plastic bags) - 15 percent ○ Reusable bags (cotton or fabric) - 13 percent ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 1): Figure 1 4 In response to this question, some 61 percent of residents reported using reusable bags most frequently for grocery store trips, least frequently when shopping at multiple locations, and some 19 percent indicated they never use reusable bags. 2. Resident Support for a Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 2): Figure 2 Nearly 27 percent of residents said that even a $0.01 fee would preclude them from using a carryout bag. On the opposite end of the scale, more than 23 percent of residents said the carryout bag fee would need to reach $1.00 per bag to stop them from purchasing a carryout bag. ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 3) Figure 3 When residents were asked to rank three options from most to least preferable, with one being their most preferred option and three their least preferred, responses fell in this average-rank order: ● No carryout bag fee is implemented - 1.74 average ranking, meaning that this option was the most preferable to residents 5 ● A carryout bag fee is implemented that merchants can participate in voluntarily - 2.04 average ranking, indicating that most residents ranked this their second choice ● A carryout bag fee is implemented with all merchants required to comply - 2.22 average ranking, placing this as the least preferred option by a small margin ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 4) Figure 4 ● When asked whether a per-bag fee should be implemented for various types of carryout bags, residents generally: ○ Favored a fee for plastic bags; while plastic bags received the highest number of yes responses regarding a potential fee, at 96, the number of no responses for requiring a fee per plastic bags was slightly lower at 88 ○ Did not favor a fee for paper, compostable or reusable bags, with only 50, 29 and 50 affirmative responses, respectively ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 5) Figure 5 More than 56 percent of residents said they would prefer to patronize a business that provided a credit or rebate for customers bringing their own bag or bags, with nearly 38 percent saying they had no preference. In tandem with this, residents were asked to respond yes or no regarding their willingness to participate in a reusable bag supply or exchange program such as the Bull City Boomerang Bag initiative. Resident responses evidenced somewhat low interest, with just over 36 percent of residents saying they would participate and nearly 64 percent indicating they would not participate. 3. Resident Suggestions for City Education for a Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance 6 ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 6) Figure 6 When asked to rank five options on how the City might help them prepare if a carryout bag fee ordinance is passed, with one being their most preferred option and five their least preferred, responses fell in this average-rank order: ○ Informational signage at grocery stores, malls and other stores - 1.94 average ranking, placing this as the most desired option ○ Receive a postcard in the mail with notice of the coming change - 2.61 average ranking ○ Receive a free reusable bag from the City - 2.61 average ranking ○ City presence at events I’m already attending to provide information on the coming change - 3.44 average ranking ○ City offer a standalone informational event on the coming change - 4.40 average ranking, placing this as the least preferred option 4. Resident Responses to Open-Ended Questions Regarding a Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance In addition to the mandatory, multiple-choice or ranking questions, the survey also featured two open-ended questions, including: How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? The 138 residents who responded to this question had varied opinions, both in support of and in opposition to the potential carryout bag fee ordinance, and provided numerous suggestions. Some of the predominant themes and percentages they were cited include: ● Potential ordinance is government overreach - 23 percent ● Expand to weekly recycling collection, expand recyclables accepted, enhance education - 23 percent ● Ban plastic bags completely - 12 percent ● Work with businesses on providing incentives for customers to bring their own bags - 10 percent ● Focus on business, school and apartment recycling programs - 8 percent 7 A brief selection of unedited comments received in response to the first open-ended question includes: ● “Banning plastic bags.” ● “Government over step on the bag issue. People create waste. Taxing bags is not the answer.” ● “Dedicate time, money, and resources to find innovative ways to reduce waste rather than simply charging residents more money for everyday activities.” ● “weekly recycling option or place to drop off overage. We fill our recycling each week b/c we get the paper and recycle everything we can. When we are out of town on a recycling week, no way can we fit 4 weeks of recycling into one bin.” ● “Recycling every week versus every other week.” ● “support a recycled bag program” The second open-ended question asked What other questions do you have about this proposal? Some of the primary themes cited by the 95 residents who responded to this question includes: ● Government overreach; don’t favor the ordinance - 21 percent ● Concern about businesses retaining bag fees and using it at their sole discretion - 14 percent ● Should ban or impose fees on plastic bags only - 7 percent ● Support expressed for the carryout bag fee - 6 percent ● City should work with big box retailers and delivery services to reduce waste - 5 percent ● Equity concerns regarding impact on residents with lower incomes - 4 percent ● Concern for impact on businesses; will shop outside of Edina - 3 percent A brief selection of unedited comments in response to the second open-ended question includes: ● “I do not feel the merchant should keep the bag fee, but that it should be donated to a local environmental resource. Put that money back into the city.” ● “If the per bag fee passes, it will only push me further to continue to shop in EP. Being in western Edina it is cheaper for us to shop there (tax levies, bag fees…)” ● “Since we are a first ring suburb, I suggest we adopt a bag ordinance that is the same as the one that Minneapolis has.” ● “Why not just eliminate plastic bags? Why charge for them and put that on the consumer? The stores should be responsible for the waste they create by offering poor choices.” ● “Why include paper bags?” Visitor Responses A total of four responses were received from individuals who indicated they do not live or work in Edina. Note: a total of five responses are included in the attached Visitor Survey Response Report, but one response was a project administrator survey test. The four visitor responses to the abbreviated survey module available to them generally evidenced support for the potential carryout bag fee ordinance, with one dissenting about applying the fee to paper bags and two 8 dissenting about its application to reusable bags. Two responses to the open-ended questions in the abbreviated survey module centered on equity, with respondents wondering if the fee would be assessed to individuals utilizing food assistance programs. Two comments stressed the need for additional education and one supported banning single-use carryout containers/utensils. Virtual Roundtable Discussions Three one-hour, virtual roundtable discussions were scheduled to begin with a brief, educational presentation followed by open discussion with several question prompts. Due to low enrollment, only one virtual roundtable discussion occurred, with a second modified to a one-on-one discussion: ● Business Roundtable, May 5, 7:30 a.m. - canceled due to no enrollment ● Resident Roundtable, May 10, 7 p.m. - two residents participated: ○ Concern about abundance of plastic bags used for carryout/curbside pick up orders, particularly from Target and grocery stores ○ Suggest the City work with these retailers toward reduced bag usage and possible pilot initiative ○ Concern about carryout bag fee burden on small businesses; suggested giving them additional time for compliance ○ Stressed importance of educating small retailers to track and code any bag fees received as ‘other revenue’ for tax reporting purposes ○ Concern about whether a carryout bag fee will shift consumer spending to other nearby communities without similar fees ○ Suggest the City increase recycling and composting ○ Suggest the City “get rid of plastic bags” ● Business and Resident Roundtable, May 11, 11:30 a.m. - one resident registered and participated in one-on-one discussion: ○ “Getting more and more concerned about the processes and excessive taxes.” ○ Concern about the businesses retaining the carryout bag fee revenue: “...could be used for something not environmental…” ○ If the focus is to reduce, then impose a ban, not a fee ○ Sanitation concerns about bag reuse with carryout food ○ Concern with logistics required of businesses: “Will deter economic development. New businesses will look at other communities with less regulations.” ○ Concern over required online survey registration compromising anonymity and questioned whether survey reached all socio-economic sectors of the community One-on-One Business Interviews and Business Survey Module Responses Two outreach methods were used to gain insights from the Edina business community regarding the potential carryout bag fee ordinance. The most successful method of gathering opinions took place during one-on-one conversations with select business representatives. In addition, opinions from five business representatives were gained through responses to a separate online survey module in the Better Together Edina project web page. 9 Business Outreach - Executive Summary Edina businesses largely do not support implementation of a carryout bag fee. The one-on-one conversations with Edina business representatives proved the most productive and effective manner of gaining their insights on the potential ordinance. A few reflections on these conversations include: ● Large retail businesses, both chain and independent, tend to understand the City’s interest in a carryout bag fee to further its sustainability goals, and are ready to gear up for compliance ● Small businesses, particularly upscale, independent retailers, were more likely to oppose the ordinance, citing reporting requirements as one of the main areas of concern. ● Both large and small businesses expressed concern about the impact of ordinance compliance on customer relations ● Small businesses in particular are expecting a robust community outreach and education effort from the City regarding the onset of a carryout bag fee requirement Opinions received from business representatives through the online survey the largely mirrored those heard during the one-on-one interviews, with the exception that four out of the five survey respondents cited preferring a longer lead time of more than 12 months to prepare for compliance by contrast to shorter preferred lead times cited by interviewed business representatives as detailed in Figure 12. The business representatives that participated in the one-on-one interviews were generally appreciative of the opportunity to express their thoughts and concerns about the potential carryout bag fee ordinance and its impact on their operations and customer relations efforts. One-on-One Business Interviews and Business Survey Module Respondent Overview A total of 24 one-on-one conversations were held with Edina business representatives; 21 of these conversations lasted between 20 and 40 minutes and three lasted five to 10 minutes. Five business representatives responded to the online survey module. Businesses and the representatives participating in the one-on-one interviews included: ● Respondent demographics - interviews ○ 16 women ○ Eight men ● Respondent demographics - online survey ○ Unknown ● Respondent position - interviews ○ Two shopping center managers ○ 10 business owners ■ Four minority business owners ○ Nine business managers ○ Four administrators/managers 10 ● Respondent position - online survey ○ Four business owners ○ One business employee ● Business size and longevity in Edina - interviews ○ 15 independent retailers or restaurants ○ Six franchises (one of which included conversations with both local and corporate representatives) ○ Longevity in Edina ranged from one year to nearly 75 years in business ● Business size and longevity in Edina - online survey ○ Two independent retailers or restaurants ○ Two franchises ○ One institution ○ Longevity in Edina ranged from two years to more than 70 years in business ● Business type - interviews ○ 12 retail stores ○ Five restaurants ○ Four include both restaurant and retail ● Business type - online survey ○ Two retail stores ○ Two restaurants ○ One institution A list of all businesses contacted for the one-on-one interviews is attached as Exhibit 4. Of the three very short conversations that took place in addition to the 21 longer interviews, two business representatives said their firm will comply with whatever the City requires and one was strongly opposed to a potential carryout bag fee but did not wish to be interviewed. Managers of two restaurants, one each a franchise and independent, participated in one-on-one interviews and the owners of those restaurants subsequently took the online survey. The online survey data attached as Exhibit 2 is presented anonymously. Amount and Types of Bags Used - Interviews and Online Survey ● Businesses were asked to estimate the type and range of carryout bags distributed monthly (e.g., 1-100, 101-500, 501-1,000, etc.). Bag types included plastic, brown paper, paper bags (not brown), compostable bags, reusable bags (plastic) and reusable bags (cotton or other fabric). Both business representatives who were interviewed and who responded to the survey estimated a wide range on the number of bags distributed each month, from 50 to 150,000. Most of the businesses distribute between 500 and 1,000 per month. 11 A majority of businesses interviewed distribute paper bags, either exclusively or combined. (Figure 7A) Type of Bag or Bags Plastic only Paper only Paper and Plastic Paper and Cloth Plastic and Canvas Canvas or Cloth Bags for Sale Number of Businesses 2 8 6 1 1 3 Independent 6 5 1 1 1 Franchise 2 2 1 2 Figure 7A A majority of businesses responding to the survey also distribute paper bags, either exclusively or combined. (Figure 7B) Type of Bag or Bags Plastic only Paper only Reusable Plastic and Reusable Cloth Paper, Reusable Plastic and Reusable Cloth Number of Businesses 1 2 1 1 Independent 1 1 1 Franchise 1 1 Figure 7B Estimated Seasonal Bag Distribution Increases ● Does your business use more bags than indicated during the holiday months (November-December). Business representatives interviewed expressed a range of percentages by which their bag distribution increases during November and December, ranging from 20 to 75 percent. Of the 13 businesses citing an increase, most estimated 20 or 50 percentage increases, with only two citing a 75 percent increase and only one each for 25 and 30 percent increases. Several retailers noted that their seasonal increases occur at other times during the year, such as around Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day, spring graduation season, etc. (Figure 8) 12 Estimated Seasonal Bag Distribution Increases Type of Business 20 Percent 25 Percent 30 Percent 50 Percent 50 to 75 Percent 75 to 100 Percent Independent 2 1 5 1 Franchise 2 1 (mall) 1 Figure 8 Bag Sources and Costs ● Where do you purchase your business’s carryout bags? Of the retailers that were able to provide information on their bag supplier both during the interviews and in the online survey responses, the sources broke down as follows: (Figure 9) Bag Sources by Business Type Type of Business Local Supplier Domestic but not local Imported Independent 6 8 2 Franchise 2 1 2 Figure 9 Bag costs for both interviewed businesses and survey respondents varied widely, from $0.05 for plastic bags to more than $2.53 for custom, imported paper bags. Of those interviewed who were able to cite bag costs, 11 said they paid less than $1 per bag for both the paper/plastic bags supplied. A total of six cited per-bag costs of $1 or more. Recycling Practices ● Businesses were asked to describe any regular environmental or sustainability activities in which their business currently participates and whether they accept bags of any type for recycling. Nearly all of the businesses indicated that they do some measure of recycling on premises. Most participate in mixed materials recycling, and the larger retailers recycle corrugated cardboard. A total of four businesses, two interviewed and two survey respondents, accept bags back for recycling. None charge customers for this recycling opportunity. The two interviewed businesses include grocery stores (one each independent and franchise) that accept plastic bags for recycling. The plastic bags are taken back by the bag supplier; one grocery outlet indicated the bags are recycled into a lumber composite material. The online survey respondents were both restaurants that accept bags for recycling both distributed only paper bags, one is an independent and the other is a franchise. 13 Following are additional notes on interviewed business recycling and sustainability efforts: ● Four participate in composting (two each independent and franchise) ● Two donate unsold, prepared foods to Second Harvest (one each independent and franchise) ● One donates $0.05 to Second Harvest each time a customer brings a reusable bag (franchise) ● Plastic bags distributed from one independent business are made from recovered ocean plastic waste ● One women’s retail clothing store invites customers to bring back clothing with their label that is no longer wanted or useful; the clothes are shipped to a central location, repurposed as clothing items and returned to the retail outlet for sale at reduced prices (franchise) ● Another donates unsold prepared foods and scraps to a farming operation for hog feed (franchise) ● Two stated that in the past few years, they have trained employees to ask if customers want a bag which has reduced bag distribution (one each independent and franchise) ● In the late fall and winter, a craft store holds gatherings where customers bring in surplus yarn to knit hats, mittens and scarves for distribution through social service organizations (independent) Following are additional notes on recycling and sustainability efforts of businesses responding to the online survey: ● One franchise composts fruit and vegetable waste ● One independent encourages customers to bring bottles of a cleaning product back for a low-cost refill ● One franchise reduces the store temperature during off hours, uses tissue paper sparingly for wrapping and cites a 25 percent reduction in bag use by talking to customers and promoting less bag usage on social media platforms Experience with Carryout Bag Fee Requirements ● Businesses were asked to detail any experience they had with transitioning to and complying with a carryout bag fee requirement in other communities. Three of the interviewed businesses were able to provide information on how they, or a related business, had complied with the carryout bag fee requirement in the City of Minneapolis: ● One independent restaurant manager indicated a sister location in Minneapolis had “no trouble whatsoever” complying with the requirement and that they would react consistently across the company should a requirement go into effect in Edina ● A retail franchise manager who managed a store for the same chain in Minneapolis when the ordinance when into effect offered these insights: ○ Cited no problem with rollout ○ Estimated 90 percent drop in bag usage ○ Staff trained to ask “Do you need a bag today for five cents?” 14 ○ When it was raining, staff just gave the bags without charging on a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ basis ○ Was not aware of a reporting requirement to Minneapolis ● Another retail franchise manager received information from the chain’s Minneapolis store, reporting that: ○ While the chain was prepared to report information regarding carryout bag fees, the City of Minneapolis had not yet requested data ○ Plastic bag usage has gone down and reusable bag sales have increased, but the retail manager did not have specific data to cite for the trend None of the businesses responding to the survey had experience with carryout bag fee requirements; the one affirmative response was part of the site administrator’s test. Support From the City of Edina ● What support would be helpful for the City of Edina to provide to assist with transitioning customers to the new per-bag fee? Business representatives were asked about their interest in/preference for several types of support the City could provide to help with transitioning customers and staff to a carryout bag fee ordinance requirement. The options of providing explanatory signage to post, fact sheets to provide both guidance for staff and information to customers all received similar positive reactions. In response to this question, and at other times in the conversations, eight business representatives spoke to the need for a ‘robust’ education campaign on City’s part. Other comments received on this questions included: ● “It’s all about communication” ● “Anything to take the blame off of the business” ● “Provide messaging on all City platforms” ● “Market appropriately by City so customers know that small businesses don’t have a choice” ● “Most important that clerks aren’t first person to tell customer about the fee” ● “Outreach must say ‘why’ this is happening” ● “Fact sheets should provide the City’s phone number and website details for residents with questions” ● “It would be great if someone from the City could come train onsite employees” Recommended Bag Exemptions ● Certain bags, including those used for prescriptions, produce and dry cleaning are likely to be exempt from the requirements. Are there any other bags that you think should be considered for exemption? Please explain. Interviewed business representatives were asked what types of bags should be exempt, and many of them favored exempting reusable bags. Other suggestions included: 15 ● Any bags for transactions in excess of $1,000 ● Food carryout bags after restaurant check is paid ● Paper and biodegradable bags ● Small bags for jewelry and other small purchases ● Wax bags for soup containers In response to this question, online survey respondents suggested exempting: ● Food carryout bags, both for customer pick-up and third-party delivery services ● Reusable bags and gift bags Tracking and Reporting Preferences ● Businesses will likely be required to track and report information on bag distribution and purchasing changes. What information would be most useful for you to track the impact of the new requirement? Business representatives interviewed had strong opinions on potential tracking and reporting requirements to gauge the impact of a carryout bag fee. Approximately half of the business representatives said they understood the need for reporting, and equally preferred reporting fee revenues and/or the number of bags purchased and distributed annually. One corporate representative said they were unaware of any reporting requirements in other cities and locations with bag fee ordinances in effect. While most larger businesses understood the need for reporting, six small retailers took great exception and consistently expressed that this would just add another ‘stressor’ to small businesses. One said that reporting was the biggest ‘friction’ for them and would be very difficult. Another said they already do so much reporting and this would just be another burden without any benefit to them. One business owner said, “Reporting will be difficult and we will never do a good job.” Business representatives responding to the online survey had similar strong opinions. One each independent and franchise business representatives indicated they would be willing to report the number of and type of bags purchased annually. The other three, including two independent and one franchise, said they would not comply as quoted: ● “Uninterested” ● “None. We always ask clients if they want a bag or not, and most, who are being environmentally conscious say no.” ● “None of the above information will change how I conduct my business nor impact it.” Carryout Bag Fee Revenue Utilization ● Please detail any initial thoughts on how your business will use the bag fee revenues. A majority of the interviewed business representatives said they expected they would simply utilize the revenue to support continued business operations. A few indicated they would likely use the revenue to purchase more bags, and two said they might donate the fees to charity. 16 One corporate representative said they were unaware of other jurisdictions with similar ordinances in which the retailer retained the revenue. Another merchant noted that the fees would not be considered as revenue. Utilizing correct accounting for carryout bag fee revenues also was referenced in the May 10 virtual roundtable discussion. Of the online survey respondents who answered this question, one cited it as a ‘nuisance tax’ that they would not assess, one said they would use fee revenue to cover the point-of-sale system retrofit cost and another said they were not sure how they would use the revenue. Possible Customer Refund or Credit ● Would your business give a credit or refund to customers bringing their own bag or bags? Business representatives were asked if they would consider giving a credit or refund to customers bringing their own bag or bags. Of the online survey responses, four said no and one franchise business representative said it would be up to the corporate system. A number of interviewed merchants had no opinions on this, but approximately 10 of those interviewed said ‘yes’ or ‘maybe’, with only one indicating they absolutely would not do so. A few other comments and notes include: ● One merchant gives a $5 to $12 credit for a future purchase to customers bringing their own bag or bags; the variable credit depends on the initial purchase amount ● One specialty retail store owner said they did not want to encourage customers to bring their own bags, as their imported, branded bags are an important component of their marketing efforts Support for Required or Voluntary Carryout Bag Fee ● Are you in favor of a required bag fee? ● Are you in favor of a voluntary bag fee? Businesses could volunteer to implement a bag fee rather than being required by the City. Overall, both business representatives who were interviewed and those who chose to respond to the online survey were not in favor of a required or voluntary carryout bag fee, as illustrated: (Figure 10) Support for a Required or Voluntary Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Carryout Bag Fee Yes No Neutral/No Opinion Plastic Bags Only Required 3 16 7 1 Voluntary 8 11 10 Figure 10 17 Additional comments on a required carryout bag fee include: ● “We are in the middle on this. We are a Green Business but are very concerned how it’s communicated to the community so it’s not punitive. It shouldn’t be done at the expense of small business; it will be hard for small business, easier for large business.” ● “We do have to think about alternate ways to get products home.” ● “I’m in favor of getting things out of the landfill. This could be important for retail users of many bags per week, per year, such as a grocery store.” ● “Super embarrassing to charge for a bag when a customer is making a $500 jeans purchase. We are not a grocery store.” ● “We take pride in being generous with our customers, and this seems tacky, chintzy.” ● “Not all businesses are the same.” ● “This is a lose/lose situation; customers will view it as a tax and will think businesses are asking for the program.” ● “People are concerned about fees. It will help the environment but people don’t want to pay extra money.” ● “I understand the purpose, but am concerned customers will be annoyed.” ● “This will be difficult to implement fairly.” ● “Paper can be recycled.” ● “I invest in my bags and don’t want to push people away from using them.” Relative to a possible voluntary fee, those who opposed it generally expressed concern over lack of consistency or a “level playing field” among businesses. One said, “A voluntary fee is just a stepping stone to a requirement.” Compliance Concerns ● The online survey module asked businesses to rank various aspects of compliance from easy to difficult: (Figure 11) Compliance Issues Ratings by Business Type Compliance Issue Very Difficult Somewhat Difficult Neutral Easy N/A Employee Training 1 (Independent) 1 (Chain) 1 (Chain) 1 (Independent) 1 (Independent) Systems Update 3 (1 Chain, 2 Independent) 2 (1 Chain, 1 Independent) Cost 1 (Independent) 1 (Chain) 2 (1 Chain, 1 Independent) Customer Relations 4 (1 Chain, 3 Independent) 1 (Chain) Figure 11 18 Expected Impact of a Required Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance ● What do you expect will be the impact of a required fee? During the interviews, business representatives expressed a variety of strong opinions about their expectations on how a required carryout bag fee would impact their business. (Figure 12) Expected Impact of a Required Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance by Business Type Type of Business Communication Concerns Concerns About Customer Relations Expect Easy Customers Acceptance and Compliance Independent 5 7 5 Franchise 3 (one mall) 3 Figure 12 Specific comments from business representatives include: ● “There will be a few complainers and then people will get used to it.” ● “This will aggravate consumers who are tired of being nickel and dimed.” ● “This will be harder with high-end purchases, but I expect a mixed bag on how people feel about it.” ● “There will be less bag usage and customers will understand.” ● “I will have to add a process to track this for little value.” ● “I fear that it’s not a state-wide standard and customers will shop in another town without a bag fee. We could lose business.” ● I’m concerned that customers will take out their frustrations on employees. We hire people of all abilities and some might not be able to handle customer frustration.” ● “Most people will support it and it will be a non-issue after the initial adjustment.” ● “I don’t think this will impact consumer behavior.” ● “People won’t freak out, but this will take time for staff to explain and they have limited time when we are in a rush.” ● “No one will want bags anymore. The change was remarkable at the Minneapolis location.” ● “Customers will balk, and staff will not support the fee to avoid conflict.” ● “If there is great communication, it will temper concerns. I don’t expect pushback across all customers. Great marketing is needed.” ● “There will be a good impact. Ultimately, customers will come with their own bags and maybe we will have reusable bags for purchase.” ● “We will lose customers, and this will not be well received by new customers.” ● “People won’t mind, but I’m worried about how to incorporate this fee with the frequent DoorDash and Uber Eats orders.” ● “Seniors won’t like it and will be upset.” ● “There will be a certain amount of reduction of plastic bags, but I’m not sure about the impact if applied to paper bags.” 19 Preferred Amount of Lead Time for Ordinance Compliance ● If a required carryout bag fee is approved, what amount of lead time would your business need to prepare for implementation? As with the online business survey module, business representatives were asked about the amount of time they would need to modify operations for ordinance compliance. Their responses are summarized as follows: (Figure 13) Preferred Amount of Lead Time for Ordinance Compliance by Business Type Amount of Lead Time Less than 30 days 30 days 30 to 45 days 60 days 90 days 120 days + Did Not Respond Number of Businesses 5 6 1 2 6 4 5 Independent 3 5 1 1 3 3 Franchise 2 1 1 3 1 Figure 13 One interviewed business owner commented, “It should be easy if the City provides explanations and resources.” Reusable Bag Exchange Interest ● For businesses offering online order and/or curbside delivery, would you consider or be open to implementing a reusable bag exchange program? During the interviews, one franchise business representative expressed interest in a reusable bag exchange, with one independent saying they might be interested but noted that customers might be concerned about sanitation. Sanitation concerns were echoed by one independent business representative who said they would not be interested in a reusable bag exchange program. The remainder of the business representatives interviewed were not interested or the question did not apply. None of the businesses that responded to the online survey were interested in a bag exchange program. Preferred City Communication Method ● How do you prefer to learn about and stay in-the-know about related City of Edina policies and their associated processes? In response to a variety of possible City communications outreach methods to provide businesses with information on the potential carryout bag fee ordinance, business representatives interviewed and those who responded to the survey expressed the following preferences: (Figure 14) 20 Preferred City Communications Method by Business Type Type of Business In-Person Meeting Virtual Meeting Through a Business Group Print Newsletter E-Newsletter Business- Specific Website Franchise 2 3 3 7 7 4 Independent 6 6 11 15 7 Total 2 9 9 18 22 11 Figure 14 One business representative added that they are only interested in attending a meeting if feedback will truly be considered. During the interviews, three independent business representatives noted that electronic communications are preferred for sustainability reasons, one saying “due to the spirit of the initiative.” One independent business representative said, “Edina does a good job with emails.” Additional Comments ● How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? ● What other questions do you have about this proposal? At the conclusion of the interview, business representatives were asked for any final or additional thoughts: ● “I appreciate the explanation and don’t have issues. Business owners want to work with the City and protect the environment. We need information to show customers to help explain. I think customers will understand and it will be easy.” ● “It feels like you’re swimming upstream with some of these things. It doesn’t make sense for our business. We will likely eat the fee or just comp it.” ● “Use this only for [businesses] who use multiple plastic bags per purchase on a daily basis.” ● “The City of Edina missed the mark on this, as it’s a very difficult time for businesses with state consideration of paid family leave, sick and safe time and other multiple taxes.” ● “We didn’t know until a recent health inspection about the City ordinance requiring recycling utensils, no black plastics, etc.” 21 ● “I am very perplexed by this initiative. I recognize the importance of reducing landfill waste. This is a lot of work for retailers to track. It’s been a tough year for retailers and this will make it tougher. Has it been a roaring success in Minneapolis?” ● “We will adapt.” ● “The City should approach small businesses separately and provide subsidies. The parking requirement is too strict for small businesses; it’s the same for Target. Use common sense. Incentivize sustainability for small businesses.” ● “Offer tax incentives or rebates for businesses that use reusable or compostable bags.” ● “Overall education and PSAs like they did in the 70s when I was growing up.” ● “Grocery/product packaging and Amazon boxes are a greater problem than bags that get reused.” ● “Ban straws.” ● “No other questions but our customers we’ve been talking to about this since January don’t like it and think it’s just another tax.” ● “A charge for paper bags would discourage recycling because it creates a cost to comply where there is no higher price to throw recycling items in the trash.” ● “I use reusable bags all the time but not for food service. It’s just not sanitary.” Final Summary Residents In general, Edina residents responding to the online survey don’t support a required carryout bag fee, with some support for a voluntary carryout bag fee. Of the three residents who participated in the virtual roundtable discussions, two were generally in favor but had specific questions, and one was opposed. Clearly, the online survey was the most effective method of eliciting opinions from Edina residents. Businesses Edina businesses that both responded to the survey and participated in the one-on-one interviews largely do not support implementation of a carryout bag fee. The one-on-one conversations with Edina business representatives proved the most productive and effective manner of gaining their insights on the potential ordinance. A few reflections on these conversations and the survey responses include: ● During the interviews, large retail businesses, both chain and independent, tend to understand the City’s interest in a carryout bag fee to further its sustainability goals, and are ready to gear up for compliance. The chains responding to the online survey did not express similar understanding and willingness to comply. ● Small businesses, particularly upscale, independent retailers, were more likely to oppose the ordinance, citing reporting requirements as one of the main areas of concern. This was echoed in both the interviews and survey responses. ● Both large and small businesses expressed concern about the impact of ordinance compliance on customer relations, again, this was echoed during both outreach methods. ● Small businesses in particular are expecting a robust community outreach and education effort from the City regarding the onset of a carryout bag fee requirement. 22 The business representatives were generally appreciative of the opportunity to express their thoughts and concerns about the potential carryout bag fee ordinance and its impact on their operations and customer relations efforts. In Conclusion While Edina residents are somewhat split on their support of a carryout bag fee, businesses tend to oppose the initiative. Extensive community education and outreach, as well as support to Edina businesses - particularly small businesses - will prove essential to successful implementation should the carryout bag fee ordinance receive approval. Special thanks to City of Edina staff Sustainability Manager Grace Hancock, Economic Development Manager Bill Neuendorf, Edina Police Department Community Engagement Officer Emily Jepson and Community Liaison Lulu Thompson as well as Edina Chamber of Commerce Vice-President Shelly Loberg, Galleria General Manager Wendy Eisenberg and Southdale Center General Manager Judy Tullius for their efforts to identify and provide contacts for the businesses interviewed during this process. Exhibit 4 Businesses Contacted and Interviewed Businesses Interviewed Businesses Number Business Name Address Category Type Person Interviewed Position 1 Lunds & Byerlys 7171 S. France Avenue South Grocery Chain Brian Miller Manager 2 Cub Foods 6775 York Avenue South Grocery Chain Dawn Dailson Assistant Manager 3 Southdale Center 10 Southdale Center Retail Mall Chain (Simon)Judy Tullius General Manager 4 Eileen Fisher - Retail 3480 Galleria Retail Chain Jane Swanstrom Manager 5 Eileen Fisher - Corporation 2 Bridge Street, Irvington,NY Retail Chain Joanne Lossino Director,Omni Operations, Eileen Fisher Corporation 6 CVS 6905 York Avenue South Pharmacy Chain Jeff Hahn General Manager 7 Barnes & Noble Galleria Retail/Cafe Chain Elizabeth Store Manager 8 Jerry's Enterprises 5125 Vernon Avenue South Grocery Independent Steve Troska Manager Businesses Number Business Name Address Category Type Person Interviewed Position 9 Jerry's Do It Best Hardware 5115 Vernon Avenue South Retail Independent Mike Rummel Manager 10 Serge +Jane 4532 France Avenue South Retail Independent Casey Carl Owner 11 Jerry's Do It Best Hardware 5115 Vernon Avenue South Retail Independent Mike Rummel Manager 12 R.F.Moeller Jeweler 5020 France Avenue South Retail Independent Bryan Moeller Owner 13 Bluebird Boutique 3909 W.50th Street Retail Independent Sacha Martin Owner 14 Harriet &Alice 3922 W.50th Street,Suite 105 Retail Independent Kate Bispala Owner 15 Truly Genuine Greetings & Gifts 10 Southdale Center Retail Independent Carol Ann Stewart Owner 16 Muna Beauty Cosmetics 10 Southdale Center Retail Independent Hamdi Guled Owner 17 Fit by Sha Sha 10 Southdale Center Retail Independent Marie Fields Owner 18 Parasole Restaurant Group 5032 France Avenue South Restaurant Independent Donna Fahs Chief Operations Officer 19 Coccinella 4946 France Avenue South Restaurant Independent Umut Kaplan Owner 20 Edina Grill 5028 France Avenue South Restaurant Independent Stephanie Shimp Marketing 1 Businesses Number Business Name Address Category Type Person Interviewed Position 22 D'Amico & Sons 3948 West 50th Street C Restaurant Independent Nino E'Andea Manager 21 The Hilltop 5101 Arcadia Avenue Restaurant Independent Tita Manager Businesses Contacted But Not Interviewed Business Number Business Name Address Category Type Individual Contacted Position Status 1 Macy's Southdale Center 10 Southdale Center Retail Chain Erin Demas Manager Repeated attempts via phone and email;no response 2 Macy's 7253 South France Retail Chain Keri Jones Manager Email and phone calls;no response 3 Walgreen's Corporate Offices in Deerfield, Illinois Pharmacy Chain N/A Corporate Offices in Deerfield, Illinois Calls and email to corporate office;no response 4 Target Corporate Offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota Retail Chain N/A N/A Repeated phone calls and email messages to media relations and human resources;no response 5 Williams Sonoma 3512 Galleria Retail Chain Mary Bandarek Manager Said she would have to check with corporate office before speaking;no response to several follow up calls 2 Business Number Business Name Address Category Type Individual Contacted Position Status 6 Jaxon Grey 3420 Galleria Retail Chain Adam Bevis Manager No response to numerous messages left at store 7 Big Bowl Lettuce Entertain You Corporate Offices in Chicago, Illinois Restaurant Chain Ethan Samson Deputy General Counsel Repeated voicemail messages after referral from human resources;no response 8 Starbucks 3939 West 50th Street Restaurant Chain Zachary Rothers Manager No response to messages left at store 9 Yumi Sushi 200 Southdale Center Restaurant Chain Angelene Lee Manager Said she had to check with corporate and would call back if authorized to participate in an interview 10 Stalk & Spade 3925 West 50th Street Restaurant Chain Lily Co-Found er No response to several voicemail messages 11 Coconut Thai 3948 West 50th Street Restaurant Independent Joe Owner Could not be reached 12 Wooden Hill Brewery 7421 Bush Lake Road Restaurant Independent Brittany Marketing Responded after two weeks when comment period had closed 13 Y&I Collection Southdale Center Retail Independent Nimo Osman Owner No response to messages 3 Business Number Business Name Address Category Type Individual Contacted Position Status 14 East West Girl 3931 Market Street Retail Independent Monica Owner No response to messages 15 Wooden Hill Brewery 7421 Bush Lake Road Restaurant Independent Brittany Marketing Responded after two weeks when comment period had closed 16 50th & France Business Assoc 3902 West 50th Street, Suite C Business Association N/A Max Musicant Director Emailed and declined to be interviewed; said they would support and promote to businesses 4 1 June 16, 2023 Supplemental Report City of Edina Potential Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Community Engagement Prepared by Ann Tennes, President, Ann Tennes Communications, LLC This report summarizes information gleaned from virtual meetings held on June 12 and 13, 2023 with representatives of Davanni’s Pizza & Hot Hoagies Restaurant/Edina, Hospitality Minnesota, the Minnesota Retailers Association and the Target Corporation. The conversations centered on compliance with and suggestions regarding the City of Edina’s potential carryout bag fee ordinance. Overview On June 12, 2023, a virtual meeting was held that included representatives of the Target Corporation and the president of the Minnesota Retailers Association that supports the retail industry in Minnesota by monitoring and providing leadership regarding development of public policy and regulatory measures that impact its members. On June 13, 2023, a virtual meeting was held with representatives of Hospitality Minnesota, a non-profit membership organization that represents the interests of hospitality businesses across all sectors in Minnesota. The operations supervisor for Davanni’s Pizza & Hot Hoagies in Edina, a Hospitality Minnesota member, also attended. In general, Target Corporation representatives indicated they would comply with any City bag fee requirement and expressed appreciation for a 12-month implementation lead time. The restaurant interviewed expressed concerns about feasibility, logistics and customer relations. These responses mirror those expressed by both large chains and small independent businesses during the April and May 2023 interviews on the potential carryout bag fee ordinance. The business association representatives generally supported and advocated for their member’s positions regarding the potential carryout bag fee ordinance. Hospitality Minnesota leaders expressed strong opposition to the potential carryout bag fee’s application to restaurant carryout transactions. The Minnesota Retailers Association representative stated that, generally, mandates are unwelcome and requested that any data gleaned from bag fee ordinance implementation be presented in aggregate form. Both asked that the City of Edina sustainability team remain in contact with them about the carryout bag fee ordinance progress and other initiatives that could impact their members. 1. Target Corporation and Minnesota Retailers Association Notes from June, 12, 2023 conversation with representatives of the Target Corporation and Minnesota Retail Association, including: ● Bruce Nustad, President, Minnesota Retailers Association ● Target Corporation Representatives 2 ○ Abigail Donovan - Director Sustainability Policy, Corporate Responsibility ○ Eva Gava - Manager Sustainability Governance, Corporate Responsibility ○ Lisa Linnell - Manager Sustainability Policy, Corporate Responsibility ○ Hue Nguyen - Director Government Affairs, Government Affairs ○ Caroline Slettedahl - Lead Business Partner, Store Operations Target Sustainability Initiatives Overview ● 20-year plan to reach net zero carbon by 2040 with milestones reached along the way ● Plastics are a focus globally, and are top-of-mind due to plastic pollution ● Target has a goal of removing plastic bags from operations and the company is working on a strategy; will be done in a thoughtful manner which will take time ● The Target Corporation is a member of Closed Loop Partners and are participating in the Consortium to Reinvent the Retail Bag with multiple retailers across the USA, including CVS, Target and Walmart, that are working together to reinvent the retail bag ○ Bring Your Own Bag Pilot is currently underway in Arizona and Colorado (two- month pilot project May through July 2023) ○ Returnable Bag Pilot is currently underway in New Jersey (three month project April 17 through July 17, 2023) ■ Bags are sold brand new (NJ has legislation banning single-use plastic bags) ■ Bags are plain brown and “just ugly enough” that people won’t want to keep them ■ Bring back for cash refund ■ Will be picked up by a third-party vendor, sanitized and returned to stock ● All Target stores currently accept plastic bags for recycling for no cost; bags are aggregated and sent to regional recycling firms throughout the United States ● In Hawaii and New Jersey, laws require that guests can only purchase bags if they don’t bring their own Additional Discussion Points ● How much busier is the Edina store versus other stores when it comes to curbside pickup demand? ○ All of the Targets are very busy, particularly with curbside order fulfillment ● Does Target track the number of curbside pickup orders per month in Edina? ○ All orders are tracked ● Does Target track how many bags are used for curbside pickup versus in-store shopping? If so, how do they compare? ○ Yes for curbside fulfillment orders ○ Not for in-store purchases absent bag fee mandates ■ Guest advocates (clerks) are trained to ask if guests need a bag ■ Guests receive a $0.05 credit for every bag brought in 3 ■ Target is working towards ways to reduce bags used in fulfillment (curbside pickup) orders ● If the bag fee were implemented, can Target charge for bags used in curbside pickup? ● Would Target offer an option to customers to opt out of bags if they don’t wish to pay? If not, what are the barriers? ○ Target charges a bag fee for all orders where required ○ In Minneapolis, Chicago and the states of California, Oregon and Washington, the process is implemented as follows: ■ Website disclosure states that each order will be subject to an initial charge for 10 bags which will be adjusted as needed when the order is fulfilled ■ When guest arrives for order fulfillment, they can opt out of using any and all bags ● Guest advocates are trained to work with guests to put items into the guest’s own containers, trunk, back seat, etc. ● When bags are returned as a result of this process, some are reused for other order fulfillment and others are recycled ■ If a guest opts out of using bags in whole or in part, their order is credited accordingly ■ If an order requires more bags than the 10 included in the initial fee, additional bag fees are added to the order ○ Across the corporation, customers opting out of bags has been a direct response to a bag fee; “fee is key” ● What would it take for the Edina Target to pilot reusable bags for curbside pickup? Is there work in other stores nationwide that the Edina store might emulate? ○ It is too early to make a determination, as the results of the current pilot initiative in New Jersey needs to be analyzed and adjusted ○ Target Corporation representatives promised to make note that the City of Edina is an interested partner for future sustainability pilot initiatives ● What are the barriers to piloting reusable bags for curbside pickup? How would the practice impact workers and processes for processing curbside pickup orders? ○ The uncertainty of what guest advocates will encounter when fulfilling orders poses a significant challenge; each guest interaction is unique ○ Guest advocates are trained to be savvy and work with guests to find the best solution for minimal or no bag use when fulfilling orders per guest preference ● In the absence of data specific to the Edina Target store, the following information points also were discussed: ○ Current bag material ■ Target carryout bags that are sold are made from woven polypropylene material 4 ■ Target’s single-use plastic bags are purchased from multiple suppliers, with no specific information on whether domestic or imported ○ Compliance ■ Should a carryout bag fee ordinance go into effect, Target will work with the City to comply ■ The Target team was pleased with the estimated one-year lead time for potential carryout bag fee ordinance compliance ■ Should an ordinance go into effect, Target will develop signage, train employees, etc., as is necessary for compliance ○ Reporting ■ In other jurisdictions where bag fee requirements exist, Target is not required to provide specific bag counts ■ Target will be able to report fee revenue collected, bag order tracking, etc. ● This data will come from a corporate source, not from the Edina Target ■ Representatives were curious about what the City would do with the data ● Should the City present data on fee revenue collected, bag order estimates, etc., it is strongly suggested and preferred that the data be shared in an aggregated form without attribution to Target or any other specific retail store The team invited City of Edina staff to remain in contact with Bruce Nustad and Hue Nguyen as the potential carryout bag fee ordinance progresses, and also to discuss any other possible sustainability initiatives that involve Target or other Edina businesses. 2. Hospitality Minnesota and Davanni’s Edina Notes from June, 13, 2023 conversation with representatives of the Hospitality Minnesota and Davanni’s EdinaTarget Corporation and Minnesota Retail Association, including: ● Hospitality Minnesota ○ Angie Whitcomb, President/CEO ○ Jill Sims, Director of Government Relations ● Dave Skilar, Operations Supervisor, Davanni’s Pizza & Hot Hoagies ○ Davanni’s is a local, family-owned restaurant established in 1975 with 20 locations currently operating throughout the Minneapolis area Discussion Points In general, the representatives expressed strong concerns about and opposition to the application of a carryout bag fee ordinance on restaurant carryout transactions. ● Concerns about potential carryout bag fee ordinance application to restaurants ○ Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, restaurants have greatly increased the number of carryout transactions and now rely on carryout transactions ○ They do not believe that restaurants anywhere else in Minnesota are required to assess carryout bag fees 5 ○ “Food should be exempted.” ○ “Feels like a solution in search of a problem.” ○ “Restaurants cannot take nor do they deserve another mandate.” ○ “This is an overreach on the backs of the hospitality industry.” ○ All favored a plastic bag ban, citing it as being a more impactful sustainability measure ■ “Five cents won’t save the planet, but a plastic bag ban would be a step in the right direction.” ○ Restaurants are already burdened with increased employment and sales tax mandates ○ “Charging five cents per bag sounds good, but it’s a feel-good measure that is very difficult in practice.” ● Specific concerns about a potential carryout bag fee ○ Could be implemented at point of sale but will be very difficult due to lack of uniformity in taxation, etc. ○ Concerned about negative customer interactions ○ If approved and applied to restaurant carryout transactions, should be uniformly applied to both restaurants and meal delivery services such as DoorDash, UberEats, etc. ○ Great concern expressed about whether the fee would be taxable according to Minnesota Department of Revenue requirements ■ Is it a sales tax, swipe fee (credit card fee) or a delivery fee? ■ Must be made abundantly clear to businesses as to how they are to code/report the bag fee and whether or not it is subject to taxation ○ City would need to take the lead on educating the population about a required carryout bag fee ■ Signage similar to the COVID-19 mask mandate signage would be helpful, citing that the City “did a good job” with that signage ● The Davanni’s representative indicated that they distribute both paper and plastic bags from the Edina location, and promised to follow up with data on the number of bags distributed monthly, per-bag costs and distributor location ● The Davanni’s representative also indicated they would need more than 120 days to gear up operationally for compliance Summary The themes expressed during these conversations were consistent with those of business representatives interviewed about the potential carryout bag fee ordinance during April and May, 2023. ● After detailing the firm’s commitment to sustainability and focus on removing plastic bags from operations, representatives from the Target corporation indicated they would comply with any City bag fee requirement. 6 ● The restaurant interviewedexpressed concerns about feasibility, logistics and customer relations. Representatives from the Target Corporation noted that the City of Edina is an interested partner for any future sustainability-focused pilot initiatives. The business association representatives advocated for their member’s positions, with Hospitality Minnesota leaders expressing strong opposition to the potential carryout bag fee application to restaurant carryout transactions. The Minnesota Retailers Association representative noted that government mandates always pose challenges for businesses and are not preferred, and also requested that any carryout bag fee compliance data be presented in an aggregate form without attribution to a specific business or businesses. Representatives from both associations requested that City of Edina sustainability team members remain in contact with them about the progress of the carryout bag fee ordinance and any other initiatives that could impact their members. CITY OF EDINA PLASTIC BAG WORKING GROUP REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS DECEMBER 2022 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduc@on and Execu@ve Summary Page 3 Sec@on 1: The Environmental Impact of Merchant Carryout Bags Page 4 Sec@on 2: Ac@ons Taken By Government En@@es in Minnesota and Elsewhere Page 7 Sec@on 3: Strategies for Reducing Merchant Carryout Bags Page 10 Sec@on 4: Conclusions and Recommenda@ons Page 12 Endnotes Appendices Appendix A — Memorandum from Dave Kendell and Eric Kvasnicka, Campbell Knutson A>orneys Appendix B — Enacted plasAc bag legislaAon by state and select sample of exisAng U.S. bag regulaAon . Appendix C — Stakeholder feedback Appendix D — Side-by-side merchant carryout bag exempAon comparison with City of Minneapolis Appendix E — Proposed outline for educaAon and outreach 2 INTRODUTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Thousands of plasAc bags are used in the United States every second. Most curbside collecAon programs don’t accept plasAc bags, and only 10% or less are recycled.1 PlasAc bag producAon and polluAon pose a threat to our land, water, and air on a local, regional, and global scale. Concerned about the serious and growing environmental impacts of plasAc waste, in 2017 the Edina Energy and Environment Commission delivered a report to the Edina City Council on the advisability of regulaAng the use of single use plasAc bags (SUPB) in the City. Although the Council iniAally postponed acAon on the 2017 EEC report, it approved the creaAon of a PlasAc Bag Working Group (PBWG) — composed of members of the EEC and City residents — in early 2021. The charge of the PBWG is to build on the iniAal EEC report from 2017, evaluate the pros and cons of plasAc bag policy opAons, and make a recommendaAon to Council in early 2023. PBWG Recommenda@on: Establish a small fee for all merchant carryout bags. The PBWG recommends the City of Edina adopt an ordinance requiring businesses charge a minimum $0.05 bag fee for all merchant carryout bags (paper, compostable, plasAc of all thicknesses, and reusable) and coordinate a comprehensive outreach campaign to educate businesses and patrons about the new requirement. This non-taxable fee would be collected and retained by merchants to be used at their discreAon. The recommendaAon complies with a 2017 state statute preempAng an outright ban on plasAc bags.2 This recommendaAon is informed by Edina and Twin CiAes metro business feedback and the research outlined in this report. It also meets the following goals and is consistent with the City Council’s approval in December 2021 of the Edina Climate AcAon Plan (CAP): •Reduce the use of fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions. The City is commi>ed to supporAng the Hennepin County and State of Minnesota greenhouse gas emission goals. These goals are to be compaAble with the 2015 Paris Agreement and shall target a reducAon in City operaAons and community-wide emissions of 45% below 2019 levels by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050.3 •Meet City goals as defined in the Climate Ac@on Plan.4 •Strategy WM 1: Decrease total per capita municipal solid waste handled,5% by 2030. •AcAon WM 1-5 Eliminate petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plasAcs, including plasAc bags, by 2025. •Reduce nega@ve impacts on health and the environment. All merchant carry out bags, regardless of composiAon, produce polluAon that affects our air, land, and water resources. Reducing our reliance on single-use bags is one way we strive to lessen those negaAve effects and the impacts of climate change. 3 •Inspire merchant and consumer behavior change. Behavior change is difficult but not impossible. Offering and implemenAng effecAve strategies that assist both customers and merchants in making successful, long-lasAng change is essenAal. The remainder of this report explains the raAonale and supporAng research for the PBWG recommendaAon. It is organized in four parts: First, the report examines the adverse environmental impacts of all plasAc bags, as well as the impacts of other bags such as paper bags, compostable bags, and reusable bags. Second, the report summarizes the acAons taken by other governmental enAAes in Minnesota and elsewhere to address this issue. Third, the report idenAfies several acAons that may help to address this issue and discusses which acAons are viable for our City. Finally, the report explains our recommendaAon to establish a merchant carryout bag fee along with supporAng efforts and tacAcs for reaching CAP goals. 1. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF MERCHANT CARRYOUT BAGS Plas@c Bags Harm Both Our Land, Water, and Air Resources PlasAc doesn’t biodegrade. Instead, it breaks up into smaller pieces called microplasAcs. These Any plasAc pieces less than 5 mm in size accumulate in the environment and have devastaAng consequences on wildlife and the natural environment. MicroplasAcs are mistaken for food and ingested by fish and other wildlife, and plasAc polluAon is a pervasive issue for many communiAes along the river.5 While plasAc bag li>er is not an overwhelming issue for the City of Edina, the City is part of both the Nile Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek watersheds; those creeks ulAmately flow into the Mississippi River, and plasAc waste and other li>er that travels through storm drains will ulAmately end up in there. As the second longest river in North America, the Mississippi River is an essenAal inland waterway for commerce, contribuAng $400 billion a year to the U.S. economy. It also provides drinking water to more than 20 million people in 50 ciAes in 10 states and provides habitat for a wide range of plant and animal species.6 As it makes its 2,320-mile-long journey from headwaters in northern Minnesota to the Gulf of Mexico, it is a major conduit for plasAc waste — both solid and in the form of microplasAcs — and other li>er to reach the ocean. Every year oceans take in an esAmated 5 million to 13 million tons of plasAc from land-based sources, and on our current trajectory there will be more plasAc than fish (by weight) in the oceans by 2050, pushing some marine species to the brink of exAncAon.7 4 As destrucAve as microplasAcs are to our coastal areas and oceans, emerging research suggests that terrestrial microplasAc polluAon is an even greater issue. PlasAcs in landfills, including bags, can take up to 1,000 years to decompose. In doing so, they leach potenAally toxic substances into soil, sediments, and freshwater causing harm to both wildlife and humans.8 PlasAc bags are made from fossil fuels, specifically ethylene from natural gas, and fossil fuel extracAon, transportaAon and refining is greenhouse gas intensive. According to a May 2019 report released by the Center for InternaAonal Environmental Law, it is esAmated that ”12.5 to 13.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent are emi>ed per year while extracAng and transporAng natural gas to create feedstocks for plasAcs in the United States.”9 Although other merchant carry out bags, such as paper and compostable bags, do not use fossil fuels for their producAon, they sAll emit greenhouse gases in some quanAty — or even more than plasAc bags — during the various phases of their life cycle. Therefore, the PBWG recognizes the need to consider all types of merchant carryout bags in a bag ordinance, not only plasAc, when striving to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Plas@c Bags Are Rarely Recycled and Interfere with Recycling Equipment As menAoned in the opening paragraph of this report, less than 10% of plasAc bags are recycled. A major reason for this low recycling rate is that plasAc bags are not accepted in curbside recycling programs in the Twin CiAes and in most programs around the country. PlasAc — in its numerous types and forms — is expensive to collect and sort and it degrades aler just a few uses.10 However, a powerful and persuasive effort by the plasAcs industry coupled with years of public service announcements around the benefits of recycling lead many people to sAll try to include plasAc bags and other soiled items in their regular recycling cans — a pracAce known as “wish-cycling.” Republic, the City of Edina’s curbside recycling partner, states that “wish cycled ” items, including plasAc bags and films, make up an average of 22% of the materials set out by consumers for recycling.11 PlasAc films like bags, bubble wrap, zip locks, newspaper and bread bags, outer wrapping, and produce bags cause wrapping and fouling of recycling and sorAng equipment, which leads to unscheduled maintenance and line stoppage while repairs are made. Along with the costs of the downAme, which can run in the thousands of dollars annually, recycling faciliAes incur costs associated with running longer to process materials and a safety risk that comes along with repair work. When plasAc waste isn’t recycled, it ends up in waterways, landfills or incinerators, or as li>er. The City of Edina has a contract with Waste Management which requires waste be brought to Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC), a trash-to-energy incinerator. HERC, which operates adjacent to low-income communiAes of color and other incinerators like it, produce toxic air pollutants that have demonstrated links to asthma, lung disease, high blood pressure, and heart disease.12 The PBWG argues strongly that plasAc bag use in Edina is an environmental jusAce 5 issue for us and our neighbors in Minneapolis. We are interconnected; the acAons we take have an impact beyond the boundaries of our City. Evalua@ng the Environmental Impact of All Single-Use, Reusable Bags (Plas@c, Paper, and Compostable) – Through Life Cycle Analysis While it might seem sufficient to focus on SUPBs alone, we know that even the most well- intenAoned acAons can have unintended, and someAmes negaAve, consequences. Edina businesses use many thousands of paper and plasAc bags each month. The PBWG learned that two major grocery stores, Jerry’s and Lunds/Byerlys at 50th and France use a significant number of paper and plasAc bags each month, with big spikes during the holiday season. Jerry’s averages 35,000 paper bags and 25,000 plasAc bags each month, with a 10% increase during the November-December holiday period; Lunds/Byerlys averages 60,000 paper bags and 25,000 plasAc bags per month, with an increase to 250,000 paper bags and 75,000 plasAc bags during the November-December holiday period. Because the total number of paper and plasAc bags used throughout Edina and other communiAes each year is so significant, it is important to consider Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) on plasAc, paper, and reusable bags to evaluate their full environmental impact. LCAs explore the environmental impacts throughout all stages of the product’s life: from material extracAon, manufacturing, transportaAon, uAlizaAon, recycling, and disposal. While results from these studies can vary depending on the locaAon, parameters, or report sponsor, the most frequently cited LCAs have determined that creaAon, recycling, and disposal of paper and plasAc, reusable and compostable bags all require significant resources and energy. Favoring one type of merchant bag over another does not necessarily result in the least impact on the environment. Having examined several studies, the PBWG believes that a 2020 meta-analysis report from the United NaAons which examined seven LCAs published in English since 2010 is an excellent resource for understanding the complexiAes associated with single use bags. For example, paper bags that end up in landfills cause emissions of methane with high climate change effect, while plasAc bags are relaAvely inert. Paper bags contribute less to the impacts of li>ering but in most cases have a larger impact on the climate, eutrophicaAon and acidificaAon, compared to SUPBs, unless the paper bags are reused mulAple Ames, and/or are incinerated rather than deposited in landfills. On the other hand, incineraAon of used plasAc bags affects the climate through emissions of fossil carbon dioxide (CO2), while the CO2 emi>ed from incineraAon of paper bags is part of the natural carbon cycle.13 The UN report concluded that: “reducing environmental impacts of bags is not just about choosing, banning, recommending or prescribing specific materials or bags, but also about 6 changing consumer behavior to increase the reuse rate and to avoid li>ering. The shopping bag that has the least impact on the environment is the bag the consumer already has at home.”14 Figure 1: Environmental Impact Category in the Life Cycle of the Bags. Source: UN Environmental Programme Report "Single-use PlasAc Bags and Their AlternaAves: RecommendaAons from Life Cycle Assessments” (2020) 2. ACTIONS TAKEN BY GOVERNMENT ENTITIES IN MINNESOTA AND ELSEWHERE While the City of Edina has not yet implemented a specific acAon addressing merchant carryout bags, the CAP calls for an eliminaAon of petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plasAcs, including plasAc bags, by 2025. AddiAonally, the Energy and Environment secAon of the City’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan, which was formally adopted by the City Council in August 2020, calls for not only intenAon around environmental sustainability but demonstrated acAon and results, including learning about environmental best pracAces and integraAng those into acAon plans and educaAng the community about the environment and sustainability.15 TargeAng a reducAon in merchant carry out bags through a City ordinance addresses these goals in same way that the green-to-go-packaging ordinance does. 7 Although the City has commi>ed to phasing out SUPBs, Minnesota is one of 18 states that, as of 2021, have passed preempAve legislaAon restricAng SUPB regulaAon. In contrast, eight states have banned plasAc bags (Appendix B). As a result of the Minnesota state law preempAng a ban, the PBWG requested the City of Edina’s a>orneys address the impact of state preempAon on several policy opAons we were considering to address plasAc bags. The feasibility and legality of these opAons are discussed in SecAon 3 of this report, and the a>orneys’ memorandum can be found in Appendix A. In Minnesota, Minneapolis and Duluth have taken acAon to regulate bags. In Minneapolis, there is a $0.05 fee on paper and plasAc carryout bags and in Duluth there is a $0.05 on plasAc carryout bags.16, 17 The PBWG consulted several Edina and Minneapolis merchants for feedback on bag regulaAon. Minneapolis merchants noted that most customers were fine with the five-cent fee for a bag, and in some cases would opt not to get a bag. There have not been any significant barriers for merchants to implement the ordinance. Because customers expect to be charged a fee at all stores in Minneapolis from chain grocery stores to locally owned retailers, most do not have a problem with it. Owners of businesses in Edina noted that while they might prefer a voluntary program, they understood the raAonale behind an ordinance aimed at reducing single-use bags. Specific merchant feedback can be found in Appendix C. Overwhelmingly, the towns and ciAes where SUPB bans or fees are in effect are located on the coasts or near large inland bodies of water. Proponents frequently cite li>er and water resource protecAon in their raAonale in support of regulaAon. That said, having encountered unintended consequences, some municipaliAes that previously enacted only SUPB bans or a hybrid ban on plasAc bags with a fee for other merchant carryout bags (paper or compostable) are now exploring mandated fees for all merchant carryout bags. According to plasAcbaglaws.org, best pracAces for bag regulaAon laws are those that have a fee mandated for all carryout bags as this addresses all bag types and is most effecAve at changing consumer and business behavior.18 The ciAes of Chicago and Evanston, both located along Lake Michigan in Illinois, recently evaluated the effecAveness of their efforts to address plasAc bags. A 2021 report “Skipping the Bag: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Disposable Bag RegulaAon” explores two regulaAons in Chicago: a ban on plasAc bags (which went into effect in 2015) and then, aler the ban was repealed in 2017, a $0.07 tax on all disposable bags (paper and plasAc of all thicknesses). The tax went into effect one month aler the repeal. The authors’ analysis indicates that the tax was significantly more effecAve than the ban at reducing disposable bag use: during the first year of the tax, Chicagoans reduced their disposable bag usage from 2.3 bags per trip to 1.8 bags per trip —a nearly 28% difference.19 8 More recently, the City of Evanston has decided to evaluate its ban on plasAc bags. The current ordinance, approved in 2014, prohibits stores 10,000 square feet or larger from distribuAng disposable plasAc bags to customers. However, as of June 2022, the City is exploring an opAon to replace that ordinance with a $0.10 tax on all point-of-sale bags, including paper and reusable ones. According to Alison Leipsiger, Evanston’s Policy Coordinator, and Brian Zimmerman, the city’s Solid Waste Coordinator: “Bag taxes have been shown to curb behavior while allowing enough flexibility for individuals who do, at the moment, need a plasAc bag. This proposed bag tax will help generate a greater behavior change, as was seen in Chicago aler implemenAng a bag tax, will address more point-of-sale types of bags, and expand the number of parAcipaAng retailers.”20 Several other ciAes have seen compelling results aler enacAng similar bag regulaAon legislaAon, including San Jose, CA (reusable bag use increased from 4% to 62% and bag li>er decreased 59% on streets, 60% in creeks and rivers, and 89% in storm drains)21; Washington, D.C. (60% reducAon in single-use carryout bag consumpAon in the first year)22, and Sea>le, WA (48% reducAon of plasAc bags in residenAal waste and 76% reducAon of plasAc bags in commercial waste).23 On a global scale, according to a 2021 report from the UN, 77 countries have passed some sort of full or parAal ban on plasAc bags. See Figure 2. More recently both China and Canada have announced plans to significantly reduce single-use plasAcs. By the end of 2022, all non- degradable bags will be banned in China, and the manufacture and import of single-use plasAcs will be banned in Canada.24, 25 9 Figure 2: Global Overview of Countries with Manufacture, Free DistribuAon, and ImportaAon of PlasAc Bags. Source: UN Environmental Programme Report “Legal Limits on Single Use PlasAcs and MicroplasAcs: A Global Review of NaAonal Laws and RegulaAons (2021) 3. STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING MERCHANT CARRYOUT BAGS When it’s easy to access new bags, regardless of their composiAon, consumers are not likely to change their behavior. And yet we know a reducAon in consumpAon of materials that frequently get discarded, like single-use paper, plasAc, and reusable bags, means less energy being used to make those materials. In fact, the greatest environmental benefit occurs when we displace the need to extract virgin materials for producAon or the need to produce new products at all.26 The Minnesota Waste Management Act established criteria for managing solid waste. The waste management hierarchy prioriAzes waste reducAon and reuse before all other waste 10 management strategies. Placing a fee on all carry out merchant bags is consistent with the goals of the waste hierarchy and the goals of bag legislaAon.27 The PBWG evaluated the following strategies as possible opAons to reduce single use bag consumpAon, taking into consideraAon the preempAve legislaAon at the State level as well as the goals set out in the City CAP adopted in December 2021. These strategies are not mutually exclusive. No single acAon will fix our exisAng environmental challenges; we need acAon at mulAple levels. The strategies include: 1.A ban on single-use plas@c bags. As noted earlier, eight states currently have some sort of plasAc bag ban in effect. Although Minnesota state law currently prohibits local government bans on single use plasAc or paper bags, the PBWG believes it is worthwhile to include language in any ordinance that would allow for a complete ban on SUPB and maintain a fee for other types of merchant carryout bags, such as paper, should the state law change someAme in the future. 2. A fee for all merchant carryout bags. Charging a modest fee for merchant carryout bags is an effecAve way to lessen reliance on them — a concept known as loss aversion in cogniAve psychology, decision theory, and behavioral economics; the painful experience of loss is more effecAve at changing habits than a posiAve gain. People are less eager to pay for something they see as valueless, and data from ciAes across the U.S. and internaAonally support this claim. 28, 29 3. Ban on single-use plas@c bags and fee for other merchant carryout bags. Known as “second generaAon” bag laws, this strategy combines both banning thin plasAc bags and placing fees on all other carryout bags (paper, reusable, compostable). Aler straight plasAc bag bans failed to result in the desired consumer behavioral change (customers bringing in their own bags), ciAes kept the ban on thin plasAc bags and added a fee to all other carryout bags. 4. Educa@onal “bring your own bag” campaigns, credits, and incen@ves. EducaAonal iniAaAves aimed at voluntary reducAon of disposable bags can drive customer behavior by raising awareness of the environmental, equity, and economic impacts associated with merchant carryout bags. While voluntary "bring your own bag” iniAaAves have an important role in educaAng, promoAng, and encouraging the reducAon of single use bags, they are not as effecAve in reducing single use bags as a fee. Some stores already have programs in place, and these should conAnue to be pursued and expanded alongside other reducAon acAons. 11 The PBWG also sees an opportunity for a “borrow a bag” or “boomerang bag” iniAaAve modeled aler the Don’t Waste Durham iniAaAve which aims to make free and equitable access to reusable bags a city-wide norm.30 5. A recycling bag program to decrease use of bags. Some towns and ciAes require businesses and/or bag manufacturers to provide customers with opAons for plasAc bag recycling. Recycling requirements can be standalone or coupled with a bag ban or fee to increase the effecAveness of merchant carryout bag reducAon opAons. Recycling programs sAll come with costs associated with energy and resources used to manufacture and transport bags. Also, as noted earlier, only about 10% of plasAc bags in circulaAon are actually recycled. Proper disposal and recycling of SUPBs is important, and there are ways to make customers more aware of opportuniAes through programs like plasAcfilmrecyling.org, TerraCycle, Ridwell, and Hennepin County Green Recycling. However, the PBWG suggests that greater emphasis be spent on lessening consumpAon of merchant carryout bags in the first place. 4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Our City strives to be a community where all are welcome and we are a producAve and collaboraAve partner to neighboring towns and ciAes. The PBWG believes that based on the City’s expressed leadership in the area of sustainability, the goals set out in the CAP, the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the recent adopAon of the Green-to-Go packaging ordinance, and the PBWG’s 9 month-long effort to research the pros and cons of bag regulaAon, this is a moment to take acAon on all merchant carry out bags, regardless of their composiAon. Edina’s CAP notes “ConAnuing to establish policies and operaAonal refinements to advance meaningful landfill diversion and beneficial use of waste streams represents a significant environmental opportunity for Edina.” Because deciding which bag is be>er for the environment is not as simple as choosing, banning, recommending or prescribing specific materials or bags, we recommend not favoring any one parAcular type of merchant carryout bag. Rather, we should focus our efforts on reducAon of all merchant carryout bags and reuse and proper recycling of those that are in circulaAon. It is the PBWG’s recommendaAon that the City of Edina adopt an ordinance aimed at reducing the number of merchant carryout bags used by customers and businesses. This acAon will reduce green house gases resource use, waste and li>er. Other posiAve impacts include paving the way for other waste reducAon measures, increasing awareness and prompAng customers and businesses to take direct acAon. In addiAon, Edina further demonstrates its commitment to being a leader in the area of environmental sustainability and jusAce. 12 While lessening our consumpAon of merchant carryout bags will not solve all environmental problems, it is a significant step we can take to protect our environment and minimize impacts to human health. Our recommendaAons are as follows: 1.Assess a Modest Fee for all Merchant Carryout Bags to Lessen Reliance on Those Bags and Incen@vize a Low-Waste Lifestyle. We strongly recommend a minimum $0.05 bag fee for all merchant carryout bags (paper, compostable, and plasAc of all thicknesses), with limited excepAons. The fee would be collected and retained by the retailer, who can apply it to cover the cost of the bags, used for other expenses, such as green-to-go packaging, or a reusable bag program, or donated to charity. The fee would not be taxable. Although PBWG recognizes the raAonale behind some bag exempAons such as prescripAon drug bags, produce bags, and dry cleaner bags, we believe there should be few exempAons for businesses - as long as a business has a point of sale, there should not be an exempAon. We also recommend that the ordinance exempt anyone with a voucher or electronic benefit card issued under the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) or Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) support programs, or the federal Supplemental NutriAon Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as Basic Food), or a recognized Minnesota food assistance program. For a recommended exempAon list compared with Minneapolis please see Appendix E. We also recommend that enforcement of this ordinance rely on voluntary compliance. Where there is slow or no compliance, merchants will feel social pushback from consumers who expect Edina retailers to abide by ordinances that support the Climate AcAon Plan and the environmental goals of the community. Similar policies, such as compostable leaf bags and no- smoking policies, have proven to be self-enforcing as customers embrace the change over Ame. The PBWG appreciates the effect the current economic climate has on some residents and shoppers in Edina and recommends that several months of robust community and business engagement and educaAon precede implementaAon of a fee for merchant carryout bags. 2.Create a Robust Educa@on and Outreach Program and Incen@ves to Develop Low-Waste Habits. If we all work to implement changes in our consumpAon, we can create a ripple effect that has a posiAve impact reaching beyond our community. Our research and analysis of merchant carryout bag regulaAon across the U.S. and globally leads us to the conclusion that the City of Edina needs to take steps to drasAcally reduce consumer and business reliance on merchant carryout bags and plasAc packaging of any kind. 13 We envision a bold, visible promoAonal and educaAonal campaign to generate awareness before and aler the ordinance takes effect with extensions to other CAP iniAaAves. While City resources will be needed to develop and implement materials related to such a markeAng campaign, there are many excellent resources and campaigns already in existence; some of those may be a model for Edina, and volunteers and commissioners should be leveraged to do research and make recommendaAons to staff. Please see Appendix F for preliminary research and suggesAons offered by the PBWG. Another component in the outreach effort should be the development of programs that allow customers to take and return reusable bags from businesses and other points around the City to create an ongoing cycle of use. Such a “borrow a bag” or “boomerang bag” program would help ease the economic burden that some consumers might experience from a fee on merchant carryout bags. It is worth exploring how merchants that offer these types of programs might be recognized for their efforts. Finally, while we recommend that stores conAnue with or establish in-store recycling programs that provide opportuniAes for consumers to return clean plasAc bags for recycling, we would prioriAze reducAon strategies. ENDNOTES 1. Environmental ProtecAon Agency. h>ps://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials- waste-and-recycling/frequent-quesAons-regarding-epas-facts-and#PlasAcBags. Accessed 10/28/22. 2. Minnesota Legislature Office of the Revisor of Statues. h>ps://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/ cite/471.9998. Accessed 10/28/22. 3. City of Edina Sustainability. h>ps://www.edinamn.gov/458/Sustainability. Accessed 11/23/22. 4. Edina Climate AcAon Plan. h>ps://www.edinamn.gov/1779/Climate-AcAon. Accessed 10/28/22. 14 5. Environmental ProtecAon Agency Trash Free Waters ArAcle Series. PlasAc PolluAon in the Mississippi River – Regional CooperaAon for a Transboundary Problem. h>ps://www.epa.gov/ sites/default/files/2021-05/documents/ trash_free_waters_mississippi_river_plasAcs_arAcle.pdf. Accessed 10/28/22. 6. Mississippi River PlasAc PolluAon IniAaAve Factsheet. h>ps://www.unep.org/resources/ factsheet/mississippi-river-plasAc-polluAon-iniAaAve-factsheet. Accessed 10/28/22. 7. World Economic Forum. Ocean plasAc polluAon threatens marine exAncAon says new study. h>ps://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/02/exAncAon-threat-ocean-plasAc-polluAon/ 8. NaAonal Library of Medicine. MicroplasAcs as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. h>ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arAcles/PMC5834940/. Accessed 10/28/22. 9. Center for InternaAonal Environmental Law. “PlasAc & Climate: The Hidden Costs of a PlasAc Planet.” h>ps://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/PlasAc-and-Climate- FINAL-2019.pdf. Accessed 11/22/22. 10. NPR “Recycling plasAc is pracAcally impossible — and the problem is only gevng worse" 10/24/22. h>ps://www.npr.org/2022/10/24/1131131088/recycling-plasAc-is-pracAcally- impossible-and-the-problem-is-gevng-worse. Accessed 10/29/22. 11. Republic Services 2020 Sustainability Report (see page 36): h>ps:// www.republicservices.com/cms/documents/sustainability_reports/2020-Republic-Services- Sustainability-Report.pdf Accessed 10/29/22. 12. Sahan Journal “Environmental jusAce advocates push for zero waste aler new report highlights shortcomings in plasAcs recycling” 8/12/21. h>ps://sahanjournal.com/climate/ plasAc-waste-minneapolis/. Accessed 10/29/22. 13. LCA Source United NaAons Environment Programme (2020). Single-use plasAc bags and their alternaAves — RecommendaAons from Life Cycle Assessments: h>ps://wedocs.unep.org/ handle/20.500.11822/31932. Accessed 11/3/22. 14. LCA Source United NaAons Environment Programme (2020). Single-use plasAc bags and their alternaAves — RecommendaAons from Life Cycle Assessments: h>ps://wedocs.unep.org/ handle/20.500.11822/31932. Accessed 11/3/22. 15. Edina Comprehensive Plan Energy and Environment Chapter (see 8-3, 8-4). h>ps:// www.edinamn.gov/647/Comprehensive-Plan. Accessed 10/30/22. 16. Minneapolis Bring Your Own Bag. h>ps://www2.minneapolismn.gov/business-services/ licenses-permits-inspecAons/business-licenses/bring-your-own-bag/. Accessed 11/24/22. 15 17. Duluth PlasAc Carryout Bag Fees. h>ps://duluthmn.gov/city-clerk/plasAc-carryout-bag-fee/ about-plasAc-carryout-bag-fees/. Accessed 11/24/22. 18. PlasAc Bag Laws. PlasAc Bag LegislaAon. h>ps://www.plasAcbaglaws.org/legislaAon. Accessed 10/29/22. 19. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. “Skipping the Bag: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Disposable Bag RegulaAon” 2/10/22. h>ps:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pam.22325. Accessed 10/29/22. 20. Evanston Roundtable. “Evanston may be ready to dump 2014 plasAc bag ban, replace it with 10-cent tax” 6/1/22. h>ps://evanstonroundtable.com/2022/06/01/evanston-plasAc-bag-ban- tax/. Accessed 10/29/22. 21. San Jose, CA. h>p://www3.sanjoseca.gov/clerk/Commi>eeAgenda/TE/20121203/ TE20121203_d5.pdf. Accessed 10/29/22. 22. Washington DC. “The data proves the the D.C. bag fee is working.” 5/15/15. h>ps:// ggwash.org/view/38159/the-data-proves-the-dc-bag-fee-is-working. Accessed 11/16/22. 23. Sea>le, WA. h>ps://www.reusethisbag.com/arAcles/where-are-plasAc-bags-banned- around-the-world. Accessed 11/24/22. 24. BBC News “Single-use plasAc: China to ban bags and other items” 1/20/20. h>ps:// www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51171491/. Accessed 10/30/22. 25. Government of Canada “Single-use PlasAcs ProhibiAon RegulaAons – Guidance for selecAng alternaAves”7/14/22. h>ps://www.canada.ca/content/dam/eccc/documents/pdf/managing- plasAc-waste/reducing-plasAc-waste/ Guidance%20for%20SelecAng%20AlternaAves%20to%20Single-use%20PlasAcs_EN.pdfl. Accessed 10/30/22. 26. Minnesota PolluAon Control Agency. Product Bans & RestricAons: A guide for local government policy makers. h>ps://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/p-p2s1-06.pdf Accessed 11/3/22. 27. Metropolitan Solid Waste ManagementPolicy Plan 2016 – 2036. h>ps:// www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/w-sw7-21.pdf. Accessed 11/22/22. 16 28. CNBC “New York’s plasAc bag ban is a lesson in how consumers treat money” 3/3/20. h>ps://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/03/new-york-plasAc-bag-ban-is-a-lesson-in-consumer-money- issues.html. Accessed 11/3/22. 29. ScienAst AcAon and Advocacy Network. EffecAveness of plasAc regulaAon around the world. Revised 4/15/19. h>ps://plasAcpolluAoncoaliAonresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ EffecAveness_of_plasAc_regulaAon_around_the_world_4_pages.pdf. Accessed 11/3/22. 30. Don’t Waste Durham Bull City Boomerang Bag: h>p://www.dontwastedurham.org/ programs. Accessed 11/3/22. 17 APPENDIX A Memorandum from Dave Kendell and Eric Kvasnicka, Campbell Knutson Aeorneys SHORT ANSWERS 1.The City could enact an ordinance mandaAng a fee imposed by the retailer and paid by the consumer for single-use bags because this does not ban the use of the bags and does not restrict the merchant’s opAons to offer single-use bags. 2.The City could likely require that single-use bags be cerAfied compostable or have a minimum recycled material content because neither of these requirements restricts the ability of the retailer to offer plasAc, paper, or reusable bags. The City cannot require the bags to be biodegradable because distributers cannot sell bags labeled biodegradable in Minnesota, so this would funcAon as a ban. 3.The City cannot set a limit on the number of single-use bags retailers may offer annually because this restricts their opAon to provide customers with plasAc and paper bags. 4.The City could likely collect a fee designated for enforcement, but likely cannot collect a fee designated for educaAon or conservaAon. A fee designated to by collected and retained by retailers is highly likely to be valid. DISCUSSION 1.Single Use PlasAc and Paper Bag Fee Edina could enact an ordinance that establishes fees paid by the consumer and imposed by the retailer for providing a single use paper or plasAc bag. Two other ciAes in Minnesota have enacted similar ordinances aler the State Legislature passed Minn. Stat. § 471.9998. Minneapolis passed an ordinance in 2019, although it did not take effect unAl 2021. It reads, in relevant part, “Retail establishments shall collect a pass-through charge of not less than five (5) cents for each carryout bag provided to customers.” Title XI, SecAon 225.930 (a). It has a number of excepAons, including for those purchasing food using a food assistance program such as WIC, bags used to purchase item in bulk, bags used at carry-out restaurants, and others. Id. at M E M O R A N D U M TO: GRACE HANCOCK FROM: DAVE KENDALL AND ERIC KVASNICKA DATE: JUNE 16, 2022 RE: PLASTIC BAGS – EDINA 18 225.920, 225.930 (b). Duluth also passed an ordinance in 2019, although it also did not come into effect unAl 2021. Duluth’s ordinance reads, in relevant part, “Retail establishments shall collect a pass-through charge of not less than five cents for each carryout bag provided to customers.” Duluth’s ordinance also does not apply to certain types of bags. Notably, although the Minneapolis ordinance requires pass-through charges for plasAc, paper, and reusable bags, the Duluth ordinance only requires pass-through charges for plasAc bags. Finally, both ordinances specify that the pass-through charge goes directly to the retailer and is not collected by the city. Neither of these ordinances has been subject to a lawsuit, so there is no case law or guidance on whether they would withstand a challenge in court. If challenges, the ciAes which have these ordinances could argue in court that the ordinance is legal because it does not operate as a ban. They are more akin to a tax, which discourages the use of plasAc bags without banning them enArely. Further, the ordinances are compliant with Minn. Stat. 471.9998, subd. 1, which requires merchants to have the opAon to provide customers with bags, because the merchants have the opAon to provide bags, or not, under the ordinances. Edina could follow the path of Minneapolis and Duluth by passing an ordinance that places fee on the use of single use plasAc and paper bags. 2.Requirement for Single Use Bag Material a.CerAfied Compostable or Minimum Recycled Content Under Minn. Stat. § 325E.046, subd. 2, compostable bags must meet the ASTM Standard for Compostable PlasAcs. Bags conforming to this standard are currently sold in Minnesota. Some Minnesota municipaliAes have enacted ordinances on zero-waste packaging. For example, St. Louis Park requires food establishments to use zero-waste packing, which includes reusable containers, single-use recyclable containers, and single-use compostable containers. St. Louis Park City Code §§ 12-202, 12-203. This seems legally analogous to the proposed opAon for Edina: requiring cerAfied compostable plasAc bags or that plasAc bag materials have a minimum recycled content. Minn. Stat. § 471.9998, subd. 1 may, however, foreclose this opAon. Under the statute, merchants must have the opAon to provide customers with a paper, plasAc, or reusable bag. A court is required to effectuate the intent of the legislature by following the plain language meaning of the statute. City of Waconia v. Dock, 961 N.W.2d 220, 229 (Minn. 2021). Courts interpret words by their common definiAon, which can be determined by using a dicAonary. Perham Hosp. Dist. V. Cnty. Of O<er Tail, 969 N.W.2d 366, 373 (Minn. 2022). The plain language of Minn. Stat. § 471.9998, subd. 1 suggests that municipaliAes cannot restrict merchants from offering plasAc, paper, or reusable bags. “PlasAcs” are “any of numerous organic syntheAc or processed materials that are mostly thermoplasAc or thermosevng polymers of high molecular 19 weight.” Most compostable plasAcs are made of polylacAc acid. PolylacAc acid is a 1 2 “thermoplasAc polymer.” Under these common use definiAons, a compostable plasAc bag is a 3 plasAc bag. Therefore, the City would not be restricAng the ability of merchants to offer plasAc bags if the City places a requirement on merchants to use cerAfied compostable bags. This analysis applies to single-use plasAc bags containing a certain minimum amount of recycled material: the nature of the bag as a paper or plasAc bag would not change because it used recycled material. The City could likely enact an Ordinance requiring single-use bags to be cerAfied compostable or made of a minimum amount of recycled material. b.Biodegradability Standard The City cannot enact a requirement that plasAc bags conform to a biodegradability standard. Under Minn. Stat. § 325E.046, subd. 1, manufacturers, distributers, and wholesalers cannot sell plasAc bags labeled “biodegradable” or “degradable” unless there is a scienAfically based standard developed and the plasAc bags conform to that standard. Currently, although there is a widely accepted scienAfic standard for compostable plasAcs, there is not a standard for biodegradable plasAcs. Thus, to require single use plasAc bags to meet a minimum biodegradability standard would be to ban the bags, because vendors could not purchase bags to saAsfy the requirement. 3.Sevng a Limit on the Number of Single-Use PlasAc and Paper Bags The City cannot set a limit on the number of single-use plasAc and paper bags retailers may provide annually. A court might find that an annual limit does not funcAon as a ban, because it does not eliminate the ability of retailers to offer paper and plasAc bags. However, a court also might find that an annual limit does funcAon as a ban at the end of each year when the merchant may no longer offer plasAc or paper bags. Minn. Stat. § 471.9998, subd. 2. More importantly, aler the annual limit has been exceeded, retailers no longer have the opAon to provide customers with plasAc or paper bags, but instead must offer only reusable bags— directly in violaAon of Minn. Stat. § 471.9998, subd. 1 (“all merchants . . . shall have the opAon to provide customers a paper, plasAc, or reusable bag”). Although there is no case law on this point, a court is unlikely to find an annual limit on paper and plasAc bags to be permissible under the statute. Plastic, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plastic.1 Robert Sanders, New Process Makes ‘Biodegradable’ Plastics Truly Compostable, Berkeley News (Apr. 21, 2021), 2 https://news.berkeley.edu/2021/04/21/new-process-makes-biodegradable-plastics-truly-compostable/. Vidhya Nagarajan et al., Perspective on Polylactic Acid (PLA) Based Sustainable Materials for Durable 3 Applications: Focus on Toughness and Heat Resistance, 2016 ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Eng’g 2899, 2899 (May 17, 2016). 20 4.DesignaAng the DesAnaAon of the Fee a.To the City The City may be able to collect the fee, if the City designates that the fee may only be used by the City for enforcement. CiAes may raise funds for specific local improvement projects under their limited taxing power. First BapAst Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul, 884 N.W.2d 355, 359 (Minn. 2016). When a charge is imposed under a city’s police power, however, the charge is a fee and not a tax. Id. “Although broad, a municipality’s police power does not ‘extend[] to permit revenue raising measures.’” Id. (quoAng County Joe, Inc., v. City of Eagan, 560 N.W.2d 681, 686 (Minn. 1997). To determine whether a charge is a tax or a fee, Minnesota courts look to the primary purpose of the charge—if the charge is to recover the cost of regulaAon, it is a fee; if the charge is to raise funds, it is a tax. Id. “The crucial quesAon is not what power a city exercises when it uses the funds collected, but rather what power a city exercises when it collects the funds.” Id. at 361 (emphasis in original). In this case, a charge collected by the City would have to fall under the City’s police power and be a fee in order for the ordinance to comply with Minnesota law. If the City does not uAlilze the money to reimburse the City for enforcement costs, a court would deem the fee a tax and invalidate it on that basis. Therefore, the City likely cannot designate the collected money for educaAon or conservaAon, as those are revenue-raising measures to benefit the people of the City. If the City designates the funds for enforcement, the collected money is more likely to be deemed a fee for the service the City provides in enforcement. b.To the retailer A fee that is collected and retained by the retailer is not a charge going to the City. Therefore, it is not a fee paid to the City for services nor is it a tax paid to the City to raise revenues. This avoids the issues discussed in the previous paragraph. Both Duluth and Minneapolis designate the charge collected by the retailer for the single-use bags shall be retained by the retailer to cover their costs. This pracAce has not been challenged in court and therefore appears to be permissible, unless and unAl it is challenged. CONCLUSION Edina has the opAon to pass an ordinance similar to those passed by the ciAes of Minneapolis and Duluth, subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statute and cases governing city powers to collect fees and taxes. 21 APPENDIX B Enacted plas@c bag legisla@on by state and select sample of exis@ng U.S. bag regula@on Enacted PlasAc Bag LegislaAon by State. Source NaAonal Conference of State Legislatures (2021) 22 City/ Town Popula@ on (2020) Effec@ve Date Ordinance Overview and Ra@onale Addi@onal Informa@on Louisville, CO 21,226 January 1, 2022 All retail stores in Louisville are required to charge $0.25 cents for every plasAc or paper bag used at checkout. h>ps://www.louisvilleco.gov/home/ showpublisheddocument/ 30323/637503628614900000 Edwardsvi lle, IL 25,332 July 12, 2021 Requires a $0.10 per bag fee for disposable plasAc and paper checkout bags at all retail businesses greater than 7,000 sq. l. in the City of Edwardsville. h>ps://www.cityofedwardsville.com/571/ Single-Use-Bag-Fee Newton, MA 88,923 January 8, 2020 (for stores 3,500 square feet or larger) July 8, 2020 (for stores less than 3,500 square feet) If bags are provided to customers, the bag shall be either recyclable paper bag or a reusable checkout bag (see ordinance for a definiAon of each) A retail establishment that provides any type of checkout bag shall sell it for no less than ten cents ($0.10). All moneys collected pursuant to this ordinance shall be retained by the retail establishment. h>ps://www.newtonma.gov/government/ health-human-services/inspector-of-weights- measures/plasAc-bag-reducAon-ordinance Boulder, CO 108,777 July 1, 2013 $0.10 fee on all disposable plasAc and paper checkout bags at grocery stores in the city. This fee is intended to address the impact of disposable bags in the community and encourage the use of reusable bags. h>ps:// bouldercolorado.g ov/media/5858/ download?inline 23 Minneapo lis, MN 429,954 October 1, 2021 Retailers must charge a minimum $0.05 fee per carryout bag. The fee is kept by the retailer and is not a tax. It can be put towards the cost of the bags, used for other expenses, or donated to charity. These fees are not taxable. Unless a transacAon is specifically exempt, a retailer must charge the fee to customers, and can’t choose to absorb the cost. In general, non-profits are not exempt from the fee. h>ps:// www2.minneapolis mn.gov/ businessservices/ licensespermitsinspecAons/ business- licenses/ bring-your-ownbag/ Denver, CO 715,878 July 1, 2021 Encourages shoppers to switch to reusable bags and requires retail stores in Denver to charge $0.10 for each disposable bag (plasAc, paper, or other material including but not limited to compostable material) provided to customers at checkout. h>ps:// denvergov.org/ Government/ AgenciesDepartments- Offices/Agencies- Departments- Offices-Directory/ Climate-AcAon- SustainabilityResiliency/ZeroWaste/Bring- YourOwn-Bag-Program 24 APPENDIX C Stakeholder feedback Minneapolis businesses Two Hardware store. •Smaller volume store saw the charge as a way to make up for the cost of bags and other expenses. •Larger store charges for bags around 80% of the Ame. Not many people get upset. •Some customers will ask if there is a charge for bags, and will refuse a bag if so. •Some customers will accept the 5 cent charge for convenience. Toy Store •They charge their customers for carry out bags, and are supporAve of the iniAate. •Customers do not seem to get upset. •Some will refuse a bag if they are told of the charge. Liquor Store — they do not generally charge customers. Grocery Store •They charge their customers for carry out bags — not always informing the customer of the charge, because the ordinance has been in effect for a while now. •Most are fine with the fee, either refusing a bag or accepAng the charge. •They provide a box where customers can both donate used bags and grab a bag with out a charge. Garden Center •They charge their customers for carry out bags. •Some customers get upset when they are told that it’s 5 cents for a bag. •Those who do get “annoyed” will usually refuse a bag, which “while it can be frustraAng in the check-out experience, it is ulAmately the whole point”. 25 Edina’s Green Recognized businesses Clothing store. As a store, they have go>en rid of plasAc bags and sell a reusable bag. Most customers are “pleased with the decision”. However, the owner does not favor an ordinance. “I do not like the idea of having the city require businesses to charge for any kind of carry out bag. I think this is one more thing that small business owners would have to ensure is happening and manage”. Grocery store They would prefer a voluntary program, similar to what they are currently doing: for those customers who voluntarily bring in their bags, the store donates money to a charity. BouAque clothing and gil shop “We purposely sourced paper bags that are not coated for this very reason that are blank so they can be reused again and again, for giling, etc.” “If the city were to impose a $.05 fee for all bags unilaterally to all stores it wouldn’t be a huge deal, as customers would come to expect it from everyone.” PR firm “Generally, we are very supporAve of an ordinance that would seek to reduce the amount of single-use plasAc use across the city of Edina. Bellmont Partners would not be affected by this type of ordinance in our business operaAons, but we have a strong value of sustainability and would love to see less li>er and microplasAc polluAon throughout our community. We’re proud to see Edina taking a leading stance on this topic. “We support a $.05 fee on all carry-out bags, as it seems to be a largely symbolic fee that is likely to not be cost-prohibiAve to most customers, but we would also support nuances or exempAons that would make it easier for businesses to comply (parAcularly small/local businesses), and/or for lower-income customers to afford the fee.” Edina Residents •This is the Energy and Environment’s third a>empt to regulate plasAc bags. This iniAaAve has been taken up by three different groups of Energy and Environment Commissioners, illustraAng that it is, and has been a prominent environmental issue for many Edina residents. •Hometown Hero Fartun Ismail, founder of the Somali American Women AcAon Center (SAWAC), engages many seam stresses in Edina to create reusable tote bags called "Dambiil". It is important to these Edina residents to fight the impacts of plasAc bags because they have “been climate refugees once, and we don’t want to be climate refugees again”. •Edina students from both middle school and high school have repeatedly tried to bring the negaAve impacts of plasAc bags to the forefront of Edina policy. 26 APPENDIX D Side-by-side merchant carryout bag exemp@on comparison with City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Edina (Proposed) Types of bags that are exempt: Produce and bulk goods bags Produce and bulk goods bags Restaurant carryout bags Dry cleaning bags Dry cleaning bags Newspaper and door hanger bags Newspaper and door hanger bags Litter clean up bags Litter clean up bags Secondhand bags Secondhand bags Personal belonging bags Personal belonging bags Flower wrap bags Flower wrap bags Prescription drug bags Prescription drug bags Bags brought by a customer Bags brought by a customer Bags in packages with multiple bags Bags in packages with multiple bags Types of establishments that are exempt: Those without a point of sale system Those without a point of sale system Farmers markets Food banks Food banks Car dealerships & car washes 27 Types of customers that are exempt Anyone with a voucher or electronic benefit card issued under the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) or Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) support programs, or the federal Supplemental NutriAon Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as Basic Food), or a recognized Minnesota food assistance program Anyone with a voucher or electronic benefit card issued under the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) or Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) support programs, or the federal Supplemental NutriAon Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as Basic Food), or a recognized Minnesota food assistance program Minneapolis Edina (Proposed) 28 APPENDIX E Proposed outline for educa@on and outreach Implementation Planning for Single Use Bag Fees Once the single use bag fee is approved by the City Council, a detailed implementation plan and timeline is necessary to make sure that residents, visitors, and retailers all understand the importance of the Single Use Bag Fee and how to comply. Examples from other cities: · City of Philadelphia · City of Denver · City of Edwardsville, IL · State of New Jersey Key Elements of the Implementation Plan I.Timeline that allows adequate time from ordinance approval to implementation. II.Impacted Businesses communication via information sessions, mail, and email. III.Direct to Resident communication via mail, email, social media, and city publications. IV.Website to include important resources for residents and businesses including approved ordinance, FAQs, communications materials for business use. V.Other Considerations I.Developing a reasonable Implementation Timeline is key to a successful rollout. Most timelines are 6-18 months from ordinance approval to full implementation. Example of an implementation timeline from City of Philadelphia: A.Approximately 6 months before Ordinance goes into effect. The City of Philadelphia approved a ban in late 2019 and created a timeline to implement the fee in 2020. Though the plan was significantly delayed due to the Coronavirus pandemic, here is the timeline as implemented in 2021. B.This timeline allows for residents and businesses to learn about the new policy in advance of the ban taking effect. It requires that businesses begin posting signage to communicate when the program will begin and exactly what the program entails. II.Communication with Impacted Businesses A.Info Sessions for Impacted Businesses. The City of Philadelphia hosted several virtual information sessions for businesses that would be impacted by the new ordinance. It was a forum for businesses to learn more about the coming ban and ask any questions they had regarding the ordinance. The sessions were scheduled after the ordinance was passed, but prior to when it went into affect. 29 Example of Virtual Info Session Content Example of Training for Businesses NJ Video B.Materials for impacted Businesses. Provide signage and communication tools to impacted businesses. To assist businesses through this transition, the City of Philadelphia is providing various resources, all of which are available on a new webpage. Resources available include: 1.Signage—in multiple languages—that businesses can download, print, or order. a)Window signs/clings b)Point of Sale signs (at check out) c)“Bring your Bag” signs for parking areas 2.Flyers about the ban. 3.Training materials for employees regarding the fee Lousiville Colorado 4.Virtual business information sessions available to watch online III.Direct Communication to Residents A.Postcards mailed to city residents B.Email communication via City Communications (Newsletters) C.Social media notifications (Twitter/Facebook) D.Yard signs E.Press Releases to local media (TV, newspaper, radio) IV.Website A.In depth rationale for the single use bag fee B.Complete Ordnance C.Frequently asked questions (FAQs) D.Contacts for more information E.Resources for businesses F.Place to report violations V.Other Considerations A.Distribution of Reusable Bags to Residents and/or Retailers B.Bag Exchange Programs. Examples: 1.Bull City Boomerang Bag 2.DC Share a Bag 3.Goatote C.Communication to schools D.Signage with scannable QR code 30 July 18, 2023 Mayor and City Council Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Proposed Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Information / Background: City Council approved a 2022 work plan initiative for Edina's resident volunteer Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) to “Revise and update EEC’s 2017 report on possible recommendations for a plastic bag ordinance” with a deliverable of an “updated report with recommendation.” The EEC recommended to City Council at their February 7, 2023 meeting that "the City require that merchants charge a $.05 fee to customers for carryout bags. EEC asks Council to direct staff to write an ordinance that updates City Code to include this requirement and implement an outreach plan to inform residents and businesses of this requirement." Council received this recommendation and directed staff to draft an ordinance and seek public feedback. Council approved a public participation plan to support staff work at their April 18th regular meeting. Executive Summary: Staff conducted a public input process based on the Council-approved public participation plan from mid- April to mid-June. Staff also reviewed the draft Hennepin County Zero Waste Plan and the draft MPCA Metro Solid Waste Management Plan, released to the public this spring. Staff interviewed implementors of carryout bag fee ordinances in both Minneapolis and Duluth along with the lead author of the Hennepin County Zero Waste Plan, and conferred internally with City departments that are affected by this discussion. Staff does not recommend that Council implement a carryout bag fee ordinance for the following reasons: • It has a low impact on the broader goal to reduce solid waste according to solid waste experts at the county and state level. • A carryout bag fee only indirectly contributes to Edina’s climate action to “eliminate petroleum-based, single use products through the phasing out of single-use plastics including plastic bags by 2025” since shoppers can pay to still use a carryout bag. • Public input received does not support implementation of a carryout bag fee. STAFF REPORT Page 2 • And, it would require significant City resources to effectively implement, thanks to the need to regulate a new segment of Edina businesses – retail - who are not currently licensed or inspected on any regular basis. To meet Edina’s waste reduction goals, the City should pursue organized trash collection, implement a yard waste collection program, increase participation in the existing organics recycling program, and advocate for a repeal of the ban on bag bans with the state legislature. Further, the City should implement a holistic awareness and action campaign to help residents use less and reuse more, in order to reduce the amount of waste generated and the demand for extraction and production of new products. These activities are challenging, but are the highest impact actions City leadership can take to effectively pivot Edina toward a zero waste community and meet its climate action goals. Discussion: Climate Action Plan Waste Management goals: • Decrease total per capita municipal solid waste handled 5% by 2030. (Based on Edina’s 2021 GHG inventory, residents generated ~1,000 lbs. of waste per capita.) o Eliminate petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plastics including plastic bags by 2025. Require food service retailers to use re-usable, biodegradable, compostable or recyclable packaging and utensils (including for take-out). Explore the feasibility of establishing a reusable takeout container service. • Achieve 70% organics landfill waste diversion by 2030 • Increase recycling from 32% to 35% of total MSW handled by 2030 • Increase diversion of potential recoverables by 15% by 2030 What’s the problem we’re trying to solve? Both the Climate Action Plan and the specific recommendation from the EEC recommending a carryout bag fee aim to reduce waste. When an item is wasted, the resources used to produce it are lost, yet its impact on the planet and on people continues whether it’s burned or buried. Edina’s 2021 greenhouse gas inventory estimates that 2% of the community’s emissions profile comes from solid waste. Solid waste emits greenhouse gases in two main ways. First, solid waste contains organic materials – for example, paper towels and banana peels – which release GHGs like CO2, N2O, and CH4 as they break down over time. This process usually occurs within landfills or compost facilities. Second, the process of managing solid waste also releases GHGs, because transporting waste in fossil-fuel powered vehicles and combusting waste to generate electricity releases GHGs, particularly CO2 (Met Council, 2023). But emissions associated with the waste itself is just one part of the challenge of overconsumption and irresponsible disposal; the full lifecycle of an item has a planetary impact: from raw materials extraction to processing, manufacturing, transportation and disposal. Carryout bags are a microcosm of this larger issue. The EEC’s February 2023 report describes the environmental issues of single or short-term use bags, whether they are made of paper, plastic or other materials. Microplastics from plastic bags is a contaminant of emerging concern in Edina’s draft Clean Water Strategy. Methane from paper bags rotting in landfills rapidly warms the planet and increases demand for deforestation when not property recycled. It’s costly when plastic bags are incorrectly placed in a recycling bin, as they cause recycling equipment to snarl and require time-consuming equipment shutdown and constant maintenance. STAFF REPORT Page 3 At both the large and small scale, waste management affects people’s health and well-being in inequitable ways. People living near waste disposal sites contend with high truck traffic and the noise and pollution that come with it. When waste is burned, particulate matter is released into the air in sizes small enough to enter people’s respiratory systems and cause asthma rates in surrounding neighborhoods that are higher than the average for that community. Unsurprisingly, proximity to waste disposal sites depresses property values, resulting in lower-income people living by them, and a reduced ability to move away or sell their property for a fair price. Waste disposal sites are often sited in areas where land is cheap, which results in many sites being placed in Black, Indigenous and other communities of color thanks to a history of racist land valuation practices such as redlining. The modern environmental justice movement began as a waste disposal protest. A progressive waste reduction strategy is not only an environmental imperative but provides a way for the City to improve equity outcomes for residents in Edina and for community members in neighboring communities who receive Edina’s waste. Would a carryout bag fee solve this problem? Consideration #1: Not compared to other waste reduction actions. Comparatively, it has a low impact on the broader goal to reduce solid waste according to solid waste experts at the county and state level. Edina needs to use less, and waste less. Where waste is generated, it should be recycled in some way. So, what is the biggest source of waste in Edina’s trash? Without an organized trash collection system, Edina must rely on county-wide statistics to estimate this. Hennepin County’s Zero Waste Plan shows that recyclable plastic bags and film make up less than 1% of items in the trash, but organics and other recyclables – programs Edina already has in place – make up nearly 40% of what is put in the trash. Helping residents and businesses effectively recycle and participate in organics recycling would have an outsized impact on reducing trash in Edina without introducing a new program or regulatory procedure. In late spring, 2023, the Edina Health Division conducted a limited waste characterization study to build a demonstrative sample of what makes up waste in Edina’s bins. The results of this study can be reviewed in the appendix of this report. Consideration #2: A carryout bag fee only indirectly contributes to Edina’s climate action to “eliminate petroleum- based, single use products through the phasing out of single-use plastics including plastic bags by 2025” since shoppers can pay to still use a carryout bag. STAFF REPORT Page 4 The full climate action referenced here states “Eliminate petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plastics including plastic bags by 2025. Require food service retailers to use re-usable, biodegradable, compostable or recyclable packaging and utensils (including for take-out). Explore the feasibility of establishing a reusable takeout container service.” A fee on carryout bags does not eliminate petroleum-based single-use products. Removing plastic bags from the supply chain is what’s needed to phase out single-use plastic bags. The Council showed foresight and leadership when it adopted EEC’s 2021 recommended Green To Go ordinance, which requires that takeout food materials be recyclable or compostable. This ordinance is expected to reduce petroleum-based single use products, without putting the onus on individual consumers to make environmentally-friendly decisions. Advocating with state legislators to repeal the ban on bag bans would pave the way for governments to take meaningful action here. Consideration #3: Public input received does not support implementation of a carryout bag fee. The City’s public input process included two primary invitations for input – an online survey geared toward residents, and a series of 30-minute interviews with businesses. 201 residents completed the survey, while 5 businesses completed the survey and 24 businesses were interviewed along with two special-interest organizations, Hospitality Minnesota and the MN Retailers Association. A summary of the public input process can be reviewed in the appendix “City of Edina Community Engagement Summary;” a complete catalog of all responses can be viewed in the “Helpful Documents” section of the Better Together Edina project page. In general, neither resident respondents nor business representatives favor a carryout bag fee. For residents, one of the primary concerns was that merchants would retain the fee without guaranteeing that the fee revenue would go toward environmental action. The City cannot retain the fee except if needed to administer the ordinance, nor can it direct fee use by the merchant. If a bag fee were required, the preference by survey respondents was for it to only apply to plastic bags. Finally, when asked, residents commented most often that the City could reach its waste goals by banning plastic bags, offering weekly recycling, and providing more education. For businesses interviewed, one of the primary concerns was business worker experience if customers were unkind when charged for a bag. While implementation of a point-of-sale system change was not considered a significant hurdle, businesses expressed concern around employee training and any reporting requirement. Smaller and more independent businesses were especially unsupportive of such an ordinance. Public input should not be the sole guide when developing City policies, it should be considered in the context of science-backed research such as that which informs the County and State draft solid waste management plans. In this case, the public input received provides a sense of community support or lack thereof, and gives City decision-makers an idea of ways that constituents would prefer that the City address waste issues. Consideration #4: The proposed carryout bag fee would require significant City resources to effectively implement, thanks to the need to regulate a new segment of Edina businesses – retail sales. These businesses are not currently licensed or inspected by the City, so there would be a the need to coordinate with state regulatory agencies like the MN Department of Agriculture (MDA), which regulates grocery stores. The City regularly inspects and licenses food establishments, like restaurants. Other entities that distribute carryout bags are regulated by the MDA; these include grocery stores, convenience stores, bakeries, and meat markets. The City does not offer a general business license for other entities that might distribute carryout bags, such as a retail store, and does not inspect these businesses on a regular basis. Any regulation STAFF REPORT Page 5 of carryout bags in these facilities would be an additional responsibility for City staff and may require additional FTE’s. Broadly, effective implementation of any new regulation requires staff for: • Communications: Develop and implement a plan to raise awareness, communicate requirements and answer questions. • Implementation: Access the staff capacity, technical resources and expertise to manage the day-to- day of engaging regulated entities and ensuring compliance. • Enforcement: Develop and implement an enforcement plan with non-compliant entities. • Evaluation: Assess success of the regulation. Identify regulation goals that originally motivated passage and measure progress on these goals, usually through some kind of data gathering and reporting. Edina Sustainability Manager interviewed implementors of carryout bag fee ordinances in both Minneapolis and Duluth along with the lead author of the Hennepin County Zero Waste Plan. The two cities in Minnesota with a current bag fee have some similarities related to this topic. In both cases, cities passed an ordinance without any resources or formal plan to communicate, implement, enforce and evaluate it. In particular: • Neither city dedicated measurable resources to a communications campaign when the ordinance was passed. There is no ongoing education or awareness. • Neither city took action on new staffing needs when the ordinance was passed. • Because of the low resourcing related to education and implementation, the ordinance is not meaningfully enforced. When a complaint is made to either City, the complaint is investigated by staff, meaning a visit is made to the business or a letter is mailed. However, both city representatives commented that rarely is a step taken in enforcement. • Neither city requires any kind of regular reporting by businesses to measure effectiveness of the ordinance on reaching stated goals. The City of Edina should pass ordinances that are backed by research showing they will meaningfully help the City reach its goals, and should include approval of needed resources in order to effectively implement and measure success. If the City were to pass a carryout bag fee ordinance, it would need: • A new general business license that applies to retail entities and adequate expansion of existing software resources to manage it. The City Attorney would need to advise on adding any new business licenses. • Up to two dedicated staff to administer the day-to-day implementation. With 300+ retailers and 120+ restaurants in Edina, staff would be needed to help educate business workers and owners, proactively inspect businesses for compliance, respond to resident complaints regarding non- compliance, and to gather a regular (likely annual) report from businesses to analyze and evaluate for progress on stated goals. • Financial resources and staff time, or time from a contractor, to develop and implement an awareness campaign that is multi-lingual and tailored for multiple audiences including business owners, workers, residents and shoppers. • The above resources are estimated to cost up to $600,000 annually (two staff, expanded software and communication support). Consideration #5: Are there more targeted ways to fee carryout bags beyond a blanket ordinance? STAFF REPORT Page 6 18 interviewed businesses provided an estimated number of bags distributed on a monthly basis. Slightly more paper (~55%) than plastic (~45%) bags are distributed from these businesses, which are generally representative of the kind of commerce in Edina from small and large restaurant, retail and grocery businesses. The City estimates there are 120 restaurants in Edina; based on the reported bag distribution by interviewed restaurants, roughly 360,000 bags are estimated to be distributed monthly by restaurants across Edina. The City estimates there are 300 retailers in Edina; based on the reported bag distribution by interviewed retailers (excluding groceries), roughly 366,000 bags are estimated to be distributed monthly by retailers across Edina. There are around six grocery stores in Edina; based on reporting from two, roughly 600,000 bags are estimated to be distributed monthly at grocery stores across Edina. Across these three sectors, then, around 1,300,000 bags are distributed monthly in Edina. If $0.05 were charged per bag, this carryout bag fee would result in ~$65,000 in new revenue for these businesses monthly, or $780,000 annually. With an estimated implementation cost of $600,000, the City would need to retain $0.04/bag distributed to administer the ordinance. If bag use reduced over time, as would be the intent, the City would need to find other sources of funding to support ongoing ordinance enforcement. Staff identified a few policy options if Council wished to pursue a carryout bag fee that is more targeted than the original EEC recommendation to fee all carryout bags. In all cases, the City should retain 80% of the fee to implement the ordinance: 1. Only put a fee on plastic bags, applied to all businesses in Edina. a. Benefits: i. Residents prefer – based on survey results – a fee on plastic bags over a broad fee that affects all kinds of bags. ii. This would affect around half the bags that are distributed in Edina monthly b. Risks: i. Retailers may simply switch to free paper bags, so bag use might not actually diminish. ii. The City does not regulate grocery or retail stores, so would need to implement a new process with new resources to do so. 2. Only put a fee on bags distributed from grocery stores. a. Benefits: i. This would affect around half the bags distributed in Edina monthly, but would require regulation on fewer than 10 entities in Edina. ii. Most grocery stores operating in Edina already implement a bag fee in other Minnesota cities. b. Risks: i. This could concentrate the fee on basic shopper needs, food. ii. It could cause customer confusion about when to pay for a bag or not, resulting in poor treatment of grocery workers and resident complaints. iii. The City does not regulate grocery stores, so would need to implement a new process with new resources to do so. STAFF REPORT Page 7 3. Amend Edina’s Green to Go ordinance to require that restaurant carryout bags also be recyclable or compostable. a. Benefits: i. The City regulates restaurants, and already has an ordinance in place to regulate take-out food implements. b. Risks i. Would have limited to no effect on the issue of carryout bags: 1. Around 25% of monthly bag distribution comes from restaurants. 2. This likely would not reduce carryout bag use, since customers would still receive a bag for their take-out order. 3. Restauranteurs could argue that plastic bags are recyclable, along with paper bags. Thus, bag type may not change. While these are more targeted pathways to put a fee on carryout bags, staff are skeptical that options #1 and #3 would meaningfully reduce carryout bag use and meet the intent of the fee proposal. Option #2 has the best chance of meaningfully reducing carryout bag use in a cost-effective manner, but disproportionally affects shoppers’ necessary spending (food) versus discretionary (restaurants and retail). Any option would require new resource investments and processes from the City to be successful. How might a carryout bag fee affect equity outcomes in Edina? 1. All of Edina’s waste goes somewhere: • Landfills in Burnsville and Inver Grove Heights • Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC) in North Minneapolis • Recycling goes to various materials recovery facilities in Minnesota, such as in Eureka, MN • Organics recycling goes to Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Organics Recycling Facility These communities experience the detrimental impacts of Edina’s waste although they did not produce it, including noise and air pollution from trucks transporting waste, particulate matter air pollution that can affect people’s health living near facilities, along with general nuisance issues like odor. A carryout bag fee would not meaningfully reduce the amount of waste transported to these communities from Edina. 2. A carryout bag fee would be felt unevenly by shoppers since it is a flat fee no matter the shoppers’ economic circumstances. Some ordinance provisions such as exempting shoppers who use SNAP or WIC can help offset this issue, along with the fact that this fee can be avoided if a shopper refuses a bag. A carryout bag fee should also be considered in context of other new taxes being assessed on shoppers. How else could the City meet its goals? Through its Climate Action Plan, the City has goals to reduce overall waste and increase the share of that waste which is recycled or managed through organics recycling. These goals – reduce and recycle – begin to reflect the MPCA’s hierarchy of preferred waste management methods: STAFF REPORT Page 8 Using this waste hierarchy as a framework, the City can: • Reduce o Edina relies on Hennepin County data to estimate its current waste load. Without accurate figures, the City has a limited ability to set a waste reduction goal and measure progress. The City should pursue organized trash collection so that it can accurately gather information on how much waste is generated in Edina. An additional benefit of implementing organized trash collection is that the City can add yard waste collection as a service. The County estimates yard waste – which has an outsized impact on climate change since it is organic material - makes up 4% of current trash, even though yard waste is required by law to be separate from solid waste. The County’s draft Zero Waste Plan lists transitioning to an organized system as one of the highest impact actions a city can take. o The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce provides no-cost waste audits to businesses through its Waste Wise program. Hennepin County supports restaurants and businesses to incentivize reducing single-waste plastics through its MNimize program, and offers grants to businesses to implement waste reduction solutions. The City should ensure these programs are known and embraced by Edina businesses, to help them reduce waste, save money and participate in achieving Edina’s goals. o The draft Hennepin County Zero Waste Plan recommends advocacy to repeal the state’s ban on bag bans, in order to reduce waste. The City should support this advocacy effort. o One area of increased waste in recent years is the waste associated with online ordering: the packaging items are mailed in along with the additional vehicle miles traveled by delivery trucks. Residents can reduce their consumption waste as well as the GHGs associated with consumption by supporting the local economy and buying local. The City should emphasize the value of buying nothing, buying less and buying local through a targeted messaging campaign. • Reuse o When an item has already been produced, it should be reused before being wasted. The City has some existing programming to promote reuse, such as its successful Earth Day STAFF REPORT Page 9 Clothing Swap. Additionally, “Buy Nothing” groups are prevalent in Edina, where neighbors organize to share items among themselves to prolong an item’s life and avoid buying new. The Hennepin County Library system offers regular “Fix It” clinics to promote repair rather than waste. The City should tighten connections with these partners to promote reuse programs, and consider whether new high impact programming to promote reuse is warranted, such as a community garage sale or providing a tool library, as suggested in the draft Hennepin County Zero Waste Plan. • Recycle o The City’s Green to Go ordinance requires that all take-out containers be recyclable or compostable. Edina staff have used the last year to alert restaurants to the requirement and advise on compliance. In its second year, the City should continue to robustly support the implementation of its Green to Go ordinance to reduce unnecessary waste and increase recycling rates. o Hennepin County estimates that 14% of waste currently trashed is actually recyclable. The City of Minneapolis recently found through a community waste sort that only 50% of aluminum cans are recycled, while less than 50% of cardboard is recycled. Minneapolis also found that households who participate in organics recycling are more accurate recyclers. The success of these programs are tied together. • Organics Recycling o Hennepin County estimates that 25% of waste currently trashed could be processed through organics recycling. This not only represents an opportunity to increase Edina’s organics recycling rate and the valuable end product of compost, but it demonstrates the need to reduce food waste in the first place and avoid wasting all of the resources that go into food production. The City should invest in more education and deep engagement to drive participation in these existing programs. To reduce waste and increase participation in organics and recycling, the City should develop and implement a communication campaign to raise awareness of the problem of waste, and connect community members with programs they can participate in to make a difference. This can and should include a “bring your own bag” message to encourage shoppers to refuse a disposable bag when shopping, along with other messages detailed in above points. Conclusion: A carryout bag fee would have a low impact on Edina’s waste-reduction goals but would require a large amount of new resources to implement. There are other actions the City can take which have a higher impact to meet its goals. To meet Edina’s waste reduction goals, the City should pursue organized trash collection, implement a yard waste collection program, increase participation in the organics recycling program, and advocate for a repeal of the ban on bag bans with the state legislature. Further, the City should implement a holistic awareness and action campaign to help residents use less and reuse more, in order to reduce the amount of waste generated and the demand for extraction and production of new products. These activities are challenging but are the highest impact actions City leadership can take can take to effectively pivot Edina toward a zero waste community and meet its climate action goals. Appendix: • EEC Feb 2023 report STAFF REPORT Page 10 • Public Participation Plan • Consultant public input process summary • Edina Waste Characterization Study • Climate Action Plan Waste Management Excerpt • Community comments: EEC carryout bag working group and EEC Chair 1 227896v2 TO: GRACE HANCOCK FROM: DAVE KENDALL AND COLE BIRKELAND DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 RE: BAG FEE ORDINANCE REVIEW QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the City have the authority to enact a Bag Fee Ordinance? 2. Is the appropriate City Code enforcement mechanism referenced in the Ordinance? 3. Can City enterprises (e.g. municipal liquor stores) collect and keep the bag fee? ANALYSIS 1. The City may have the authority to enact this ordinance if it determines the ordinance furthers the public health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare. Local Government Police Powers The City Council has the authority to pass ordinances that further the general welfare. Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. 32 provides: The council shall have power to provide for the government and good order of the city, the suppression of vice and immorality, the prevention of crime, the protection of public and private property, the benefit of residence, trade, and commerce, and the promotion of health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare by such ordinances not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States or of this state as it shall deem expedient. Therefore, if the City Council finds that there will be promotion of “health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare” by this ordinance, it has the power to enact such an ordinance provided that there is no conflict with state or federal law. Both the City of Minneapolis and the City of Duluth have enacted similar ordinances. While each of those ordinances were enacted under the general police powers, the distinction should be noted that those ordinances were each enacted under the city’s home rule charter general police powers. By 2 227896v2 contrast, the ordinance in Edina would be enacted under the statutory general police power granted in Minn. Sat. § 412.221, subd. 32. The City of Edina should explain the basis for enacting the ordinance by incorporating a section on findings and purpose. The City of Duluth established findings and a purpose statement in its bag fee ordinance, stating that single use carryout bags “are polluting city waterways and sewers, endangering wildlife, contributing to climate change, and causing unsightly litter” and, “last for many years in community landfills and are a potential source of harmful chemical pollution” therefore, “It is in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens and visitors of Duluth to reduce the cost to the city of litter clean up and solid waste disposal and to protect our environment and our natural resources by reducing the distribution of single use carryout bags and incentivizing the use of reusable bags in the city.” Duluth Legislative Code 24- 39. The ordinance also stated, The purpose of this Article is to reduce cost of litter clean up and waste disposal and to improve the environment of Duluth by encouraging the use of reusable carryout bags by imposing a pass through fee on single use carryout bags for retail checkout of purchased goods. Id. The City of Edina could enact a similar ordinance for similar reasons. The ordinance should reflect the City’s findings and purpose for enacting the ordinance. Preemption Analysis Minn. Stat. § 471.9998, subd. 2 states that, “no political subdivision shall impose any ban upon the use of paper, plastic, or reusable bags for packaging of any item or good purchased from a merchant, itinerant vendor, or peddler.” Because this proposed ordinance merely imposes a charge and not a ban on the use of bags, subdivision 2 would not expressly preempt this proposed ordinance. Minn. Stat. § 471.9998, subd. 1 states that: 3 227896v2 All merchants, itinerant vendors, and peddlers doing business in this state shall have the option to provide customers a paper, plastic, or reusable bag for the packaging of any item or good purchased, provided such purchase is of a size and manner commensurate with the use of paper, plastic, or reusable bags. Therefore, no local ordinance may be enacted which will prevent merchants from having the option to provide customers with a paper, plastic, or reusable bag for the packaging of any item purchased. Because the proposed ordinance applies to any “carryout bag”, including “a paper, plastic or similar bag that is provided by a merchant at the check out stand”, the main requirement of the ordinance (i.e., the five cent fee) does not prevent merchants from having the “option to provide” customers with any carryout bag. However, section 2(b) of the proposed ordinance requires that merchants offering paper carryout bags “must ensure that bags meet the definition of recyclable paper bag, stated in Section 1 above.” Because this paragraph of the proposed ordinance prevents merchants from having the option to provide customers with a paper bag that does not satisfy the ordinance’s definition of a “recyclable paper bag”, this portion is likely preempted by the state statute and should be removed from the draft ordinance. 2. The appropriate City Code enforcement section is 1-18, and the ordinance should be revised accordingly. The proposed ordinance states in section 4: The City shall have the duty and the authority to enforce provisions of this chapter pursuant to City Code Chapter 1, Sec. 17-19. Section 1-17 of the City Code addresses severability and Section 1-19 authorizes certain City officials to post a notice or tag of ordinance violations. It will be sufficient to cite only to Section 1-18, which outlines enforcement and remedies. Therefore, section 4 of the ordinance should be amended to read: The City shall have the duty and the authority to enforce provisions of this chapter pursuant to City Code Chapter 1, Sec. 1-18. 4 227896v2 3. The ordinance should exempt City enterprises from collecting the bag fee in order to avoid any potential for it to be construed as an illegal tax. Under the current language of the ordinance, the pass through charge must be collected by an applicable merchant, which is defined in section 1 to include any “government agency”. Therefore, this proposed ordinance as drafted would authorize the government through sales at city enterprises, such as a municipal liquor store, to collect an additional five cents at each point of sale from a customer. It does not matter that the charge is not called a tax, as it would arguably function as a sales tax when it is being collected by the government. See Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519, 564 (2012)(stating that the essential feature of any tax is that it produces at least some revenue for the government). The charge is not precluded from being a tax merely because the purpose of the ordinance is not to raise revenue. Taxes may be intended to affect individual conduct, because “[e]very tax is in some measure regulatory. To some extent it interposes an economic impediment to the activity taxed as compared with others not taxed.” Id. at 567 (also stating, “taxes can compose more than half the retail price of cigarettes, not just to raise more money, but to encourage people to quit smoking”). Under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, a political subdivision may not impose a local sales tax without approval from the Minnesota Legislature. Therefore, it would be best practice to amend the proposed ordinance to expressly exclude government agency from the definition of merchant and may even include an express provision which states that the charge shall not apply when the merchant is a government agency. However, this is not to say that the City must provide plastic bags at City enterprises, such as the City liquor store. The City controls whether and how its enterprises offer carryout 5 227896v2 bags. For example, the City would choose to offer only recyclable paper bags at City enterprises. CONCLUSION The Cities of Minneapolis and Duluth have enacted bag fee ordinances. The City of Edina has similar authority to enact a bag fee ordinance, should the City of Edina choose to do so. Please give me a call if you have any questions about the issues covered in this memo. Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review for 4444 and 4200 W. 76th Street CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested. Provide the applicant nonbinding comment and feedback on a potential future land use request. INTRODUCTION: LS Black Development is requesting consideration of a Sketch Plan proposal to redevelop 4444 & 4200 W. 76th Street. T he applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings on the sites and build a 6- story 186-unit apartment, and a 4-story 65-unit apartment. T he project would be 100% affordable for individuals and families earning 60% AMI or less. This site is currently zoned PID, Planned Industrial District, and guided OR, Office Residential in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The allowed residential density in this area is up to 75 units per acre. This site is 4 acres in size; therefore, the applicant is proposing a density of 63 units per acre. The request would require the following: 1. A Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD. Flexibility would be requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from building height, building setbacks, and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The P UD Zoning is the zoning tool that the City of Edina has used for 100% affordable housing developments to ensure long term affordability. (Examples are The Sound on 76th, Amundson Apartments, and 4040 70th Street) ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Memo - Oct. 11, 2023 AFO Review (Mic Johnson) Proposed Plans Applicant Narrative Site Location, Zoning & Comp. Plan Staff Presentation at Planning Commission City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: October 11, 2023 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 4444 & 4200 76th Street West LS Black Development is requesting consideration of a Sketch Plan proposal to redevelop 4444 & 4200 76th Street West. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings on the sites and build a 6-story 186-unit apartment, and a 4-story 65-unit apartment. The project would be 100% affordable for individuals and families earning 60% AMI or less. This site is currently zoned PID, Planned Industrial District, and guided OR, Office Residential in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The allowed residential density in this area is up to 75 units per acre. This site is 4 acres in size; therefore, the applicant is proposing a density of 63 units per acre. The request would require the following: 1. A Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD. (The adjacent parcel to the east is zoned PUD.) Flexibility would be requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from building height, building setbacks, and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The PUD Zoning is the zoning tool that the City of Edina has used for 100% affordable housing developments to ensure long term affordability. (Examples are The Sound on 76th, Amundson Apartments, and 4040 70th Street) The table on the following page demonstrates how the proposed new building(s) would comply with the existing PID zoning standards on the lot. Mic Johnson, AFO, Architectural Field Office has provided a review of the project. (See attached.) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table City Standard (PID) The Sound PUD (adjacent property to the east) Proposed (Measured from building to curb) Building Setbacks Front – 76th Street Side – East Side – West Rear 30 feet 50 feet 72 feet 72 feet 50 feet 28 feet 15 feet 80 feet 50 & 35 feet* 10 feet* 44 feet* 40 feet* Building Height 4 stories & 48 feet 4 stories & 48 feet 6 stories* 4 stories Density 20-75 units per acre 35 units per acre 63 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .5% 1.5 2.4* Parking Housing Phase 1– 1 enclosed space per unit + .25 surface spaces per unit = 313 spaces required (251 enclosed) 1 stall per unit 320 (320 enclosed) *Does not meet base Zoning Standards-Flexibility would be requested through a PUD Issues/considerations: Density. The development density is toward the high end of the density range. The allowed residential density in this area is up to 75 units per acre. This site is 4 acres in size; therefore, the applicant is proposing a density of 63 units per acre. Affordable Housing. The project would add 251 units of affordable housing. The City of Edina has established a goal to develop 992 to 1,804 new units of affordable housing by year end 2030. As of this date, 342 new units have been approved of which 108 have been completed. There remains an urgent need for new affordable units. The addition of 251 new units would help the City achieve its goal. Traffic and parking. A traffic and parking study would be required. Proposed heights. The proposed height of 6 stories exceeds the code required 4-story maximum. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Pedestrian connections. Additional sidewalks should be incorporated into the plans, specifically north and south through the site to provide connections to the pocket park to the rear of building #1. The sidewalk on 76th should be moved back from the street to match the new sidewalk to the east at “The Sound.” The driveway widths could be reduced to 20 feet wide, to help with spacing to provide additional sidewalks on the site. Sustainability. The applicant will be asked to submit the sustainability questionnaire as part of a formal application. 2200 Zane Ave N | Minneapolis, MN 55422 www.archfieldoffice.com Cary: Per your request, we reviewed the most recent proposal for the redevelopment of the two parcels located at 4444 and 4200 W 76th Street based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for the future district, translating their guiding principles to the built environment. The resulting vision for development in the Greater Southdale District is to create an enhanced human experience along existing major and new connector streets, with overall experience shaped via landscape setbacks, building step backs, a hierarchy of street typologies, transparency at street level, a minimized impact of the car, and managing storm water as an amenity. The outcome of our collaborations with the Work Group is described in the urban design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan and resulted in the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. The project proposed aligns in several areas with the Design Experience Guidelines, demonstrating positive attributes as it relates to the basic criteria for setback and building heights. The plan for parking works very well, creating the opportunity for visibility to the landscape from all apartments, providing for a safer and more connected environment. As expected, the elevations and perspectives provided in the sketch plan submission provide very little detail at this stage but generally meet the intent of the Experience Guidelines. If the project moves forward, it will be important to create a strong relationship between the landscape and façade design in relation to the new streets and street rooms. The landscape design is not well developed at this stage of development, nor do the drawings or narrative describe the intent of how the landscape will serve the needs of the potential resident mix of families and older citizens. It will be important to distinguish between desired landscaping at the To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date October 4, 2023 2 ground level units and the public walkway and pathways throughout the development. Perhaps further clarity can be provided by the development team. We also note several opportunities for consideration: Superblocks: Page 9 of the Design Experience Guidelines touches on the role of the Superblock in organizing the district. As a result of the 200’ x 200’ block grid, the space between buildings becomes an important asset in shaping the overall sense of landscape and continuity of public realm throughout the district. Because the superblocks have primary responsibility for serving the vehicular traffic needs of the district, access to the smaller blocks for drop-off, service and parking can be planned to stay at the perimeter of a block, allowing for the spaces between the remaining block to be used for a network of green spaces that support the health and wellbeing of the community. This approach creates opportunities for the “Space Between” buildings to become places and connections to larger community pathways, including Parks, Pocket Parks, Recreation, Play Areas, Gardens , Stormwater Management, Wetlands, and Waterways. We suggest the development team consider the superblock created by West 76th Street, and Parklawn Avenue, running east and west and north and south and the future West Promenade as a guide for consider both traffic and landscaping for this site in the context of the superblock neighborhood. 3 District Connections: We also suggest consideration of the potential of a future primary pathway from France Avenue through a shared landscaped corridor connecting to Fred Richards Park and the West Promenade. Connections to existing assets can help develop a consistent approach to the landscape and potential programming of the broader neighborhood. Site Plan Organization: Consider removing the road around the 6-story building. This move would create an opportunity to shift the buildings to the west, allowing room to increase the setback on the east side of the four-story building from 10 feet to 20 feet or more to support a row of trees – making the sightlines between the existing apartment building more obscure and the interior space of the east building more private. In addition, consider limiting access to parking to only a single entry into the site serving both parking garages and drop offs. As noted on the diagram above, the remainder of the site can then be green space, used for landscaping, play areas, walking paths, and stormwater management. All the north/south exterior spaces between the buildings in the proposed development and its neighbors are considered Street Rooms as by the Design Experience Guidelines, and as such, should consider the space between the walls of the new buildings and the existing buildings to be part of the same room. Even though the properties may be split between 2 or 3 different ownership groups, the experience from both sides of the buildings of the space between the properties is important in optimizing access to sunlight and landscape, representing a shared community experience. . 4 The role of the Design Experience Guidelines is to outline the structure of experience, the kinds of measurements that are required to make the Southdale District more inviting and its public realm more engaging and interesting, and to recognize that every square foot has importance and a purpose in achieving these goals. I would offer this thought about the experience this site can offer: Imagine children playing everywhere throughout the neighborhood. Coming home to dinner, bringing experiences from both the natural world and the social world of children, in a place that is alive with people who know each other, who take care of each other, who learn from each other. And for our senior citizens, providing a safe and comfortable place to walk each day, along the way greeting friends and making new acquaintances from the neighborhood. Via a pathway that leads to the West Promenade, they find a comfortable way to get to a grocery store, to get a haircut, meet for coffee, and enjoy all the services of the greater Southdale District. Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic 4 Story1 Story3 StoryW 76TH StreetPOCKET PARK400' - 0"435' - 7"BUILDING 16 StoryBUILDING 24 Story26' - 0"37' - 0"66' - 0"76' - 0"66' - 0"70' - 4 1/2"74' - 7 1/2"10' - 0"40' - 1"72' - 0"164' - 0"110' - 2 1/2"49' - 3 1/2"40' - 1"361' - 6"34' - 0"36' - 0"74' - 2 1/2"47' - 0"36' - 0"126' - 0"36' - 0"79' - 0"66' - 0"10' - 0"LOBBYLOBBY200' - 0"200' - 0"DN66' - 0"361' - 6"UP76TH Street Fit PlanCOMBINED SITE CONCEPT23.09.144200 76th St W, EdinaLEVEL P1 BUILDING 2 Levels Gross SF Parking GSF Residential GSF Res. Amenity Residential NLSFEfficiency NLSFSurface StallsRes. Enclosed StallsRes. Units Park RatioTarget RatioBUILDING 11 Parking / Lobby / Amenities 62,355 20,664 33,691 8,000 28,637 85% 52 26 2 Parking 62,355 20,664 41,691 - 35,437 85% 52 32 3 Apartments 62,355 20,664 41,691 - 35,437 85% 52 32 4 Apartments 62,355 20,664 41,691 - 35,437 85% 52 32 5 Apartments 62,355 20,664 41,691 - 35,437 85% 52 32 6 Apartments 62,355 20,664 41,691 - 35,437 85%32 374,130 123,984 242,146 8,000 205,824 5 - 260 186 1.40BUILDING 2P1 Parking 24,549 24,549 60 1 Lobby / Amenities/Residential 24,825 17,225 7,600 14,641 85%13 2 Residential 22,625 22,625 - 19,231 85%17 3 Residential 22,625 22,625 - 19,231 85%17 4 Residential 22,625 22,625 - 19,231 85%17 117,249 24,549 85,100 7,600 72,335 3 - 60 65 0.92Total 491,379 148,533 327,246 15,600 278,159 9 - 320 252 1.27MetricsResidential GSF per UnitTotal Dwelling Units 252 1300TargetEnclosed Residential Stalls 320 Residential NSF per UnitBuilding 1 1,300Surface Stalls - 85% Eff1105Building 2 1,300Total Stalls320 Total Residential Stalls 320 Total Residential Stalls (worst case)Residential Stalls / Dwelling Unit 1.27 Residential Stalls / Bedroom -Average Unit Size 1,105 Site SF509,328 Site Coverage 17%Applicable FAR SF 342,846 Site Acreage 11.69 Dwelling Unit / Acre 22 FAR0.67 Metrics: 4444 76th St W & 4200 76th St W Edina WRAP AND BAR BUILDING CONCEPTESG Architecture & Design8/29/2023 LS Black Development, along with its project team, including ESG and Loucks, is pleased to present preliminary plans for the two parcels located at 4444 and 4200 W 76th Street. The proposed development would provide greater housing access and support the City of Edina’s affordability goals. The proposed site is located at 4444 and 4200 W 76th Street in the Parklawn Neighborhood. The site is comprised of two separate parcels, totaling approximately 4.0 acres. The current zoning for each parcel is PID – Planned Industrial. This zoning designaƟon is reflecƟve of the current commercial uses at the site. The future land use designaƟon for both parcels is Office ResidenƟal (OR). Such land uses primarily consist of offices and aƩached or mulƟfamily housing, with limited retail and service establishments, and minimal fully enclosed industrial acƟviƟes. As underscored in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, housing affordability is a primary concern for Edina, with a projected need for new affordable housing of 1,804 units between 2021-2030. This demand is driven by demographic changes, such as an aging populaƟon who may seek affordable alternaƟves to transiƟon from single-family homes, as well as the growing proporƟon of younger families seeking employment opportuniƟes within the city. The proposed redevelopment would assist greatly in achieving the City’s affordability goals, creaƟng a total of 252 units between two buildings. This development would be 100% affordable for families averaging 60% AMI, which could include a mix of units at 30-80% AMI. The proposed density of 63 units per acre fits within the future land use guidance of 20-75 residenƟal units per acre. Unit mix will include one-, two-, and three-bedroom units, designed to welcome families. Building 1, a 6-story, wrap-style structure with units wrapping an above-ground parking structure, would introduce approximately 186 units. Building 2, a 4-story building with one level of underground parking, would introduce approximately 65 residenƟal units. The proposed development would include +/- 320 stalls, for an overall parking raƟo of 1.27. The structured parking responds to the development guidelines for future land use and improves the pedestrian experience. Proposing two buildings break up the massing, producing a scale that is complementary to the surrounding structures. Parking spaces will be free (included in the rent) for tenants in both parking structures. LS Black Development is an emerging development company located in Saint Paul, MN. As long-term owners with extensive experience in affordable and workforce housing development, LS Black Development is driven to create high-quality, resident-focused housing and expand housing opƟons for individuals and families. The current project team is as follows: ESG – Architecture, site planning, & interior design Loucks – Civil engineering, landscaping design, & survey LS Black Development – Developer, owner, & applicant for overall project If a formal applicaƟon is proposed, LS Black Development would seek a Rezoning of the parcels from PID – Planned Industrial to PUD – Planned Unit Development. Given extenuaƟng economic condiƟons, such a project would necessitate both AHTF and TIF Assistance. Site Site Site EdinaMN.govSketch Plan Review4444 and 4200 76thStreet West Site Site Site Formal Application Would RequireA Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD. (The adjacent parcel to the east is zoned PUD.) Flexibility would be requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from building height, building setbacks, and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The PUD Zoning is the zoning tool that the City of Edina has used for 100% affordable housing developments to ensure long term affordability. (Examples are The Sound on 76th, Amundson Apartments, and 4040 70th Street) Issues/Considerations Issues/ConsiderationsDensity. The development density is toward the high end of the density range. The allowed residential density in this area is up to 75 units per acre. This site is 4 acres in size; therefore, the applicant is proposing a density of 63 units per acre. Affordable Housing. The project would add 251 units of affordable housing. The City of Edina has established a goal to develop 992 to 1,804 new units of affordable housing by year end 2030. As of this date, 342 new units have been approved of which 108 have been completed. There remains an urgent need for new affordable units. The addition of 251 new units would help the City achieve its goal.Traffic and parking. A traffic and parking study would be required. Proposed heights. The proposed height of 6 stories exceeds the code required 4-story maximum. Issues/ConsiderationsPedestrian connections. Additional sidewalks should be incorporated into the plans, specifically north and south through the site to provide connections to the pocket park to the rear of building #1. The sidewalk on 76thshould be moved back from the street to match the new sidewalk to the east at “The Sound.”The driveway widths could be reduced to 20 feet wide, to help with spacing to provide additional sidewalks on the site. Sustainability. The applicant will be asked to submit the sustainability questionnaire as part of a formal application. Discussion/Feedback Date: October 17, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Prep Memo Oct. 17, 2023 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Prep Memo Oct. 17, 2023 1 Sharon Allison From:Scott H. Neal Sent:Tuesday, October 17, 2023 2:22 PM To:jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com; James Hovland; James Pierce; Carolyn Jackson; Kate Agnew; Julie Risser Cc:Sharon Allison Subject:Prep Memo for Work Session and City Council Meeting on October 17, 2023 Good Afternoon Everyone – WORK SESSION We have a lot of ground to cover at the Work Session tonight. We are seeking Council comments on the Preliminary concept planning for Braemar Park improvements. The update on operations at Braemar Golf Course is just informational. Council Member Agnew will not be able to join us for the Work Session, but she will be at tonight’s Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING I have received no requests to remove anything from the Consent Agenda. We have four Special Recognitions and Presentations tonight. All are choreographed and ready for presenting. There seems to be a lot of new information swirling around about the proposed carryout bag ordinance. Grace Hancock will deliver the staff presentation tonight, including Q&A. There haven’t been any changes made to the ordinance that was approved on first reading at the October 3 meeting. I understand there may be proposals to amend the proposed ordinance at tonight’s meeting. We should have some discussion about process for amending the ordinance at the beginning of the consideration process for this item. That’s all I have for you for now. See you tonight. 2 Scott Scott H. Neal, City Manager 952-826-0401 | Fax 952-826-0390 sneal@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Follow me on Twitter.