Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-11-21 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, November 21, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearings Call 786-496-5601 Enter Conference 3598064# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak An operator will introduce you when it is your turn I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Nov. 8, 2023 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Approve Third Amendment to Lease Agreement with Lancer Food & Beverage, LLC at Braemar Golf Course D.Resolution No. 2023-83: Setting Parks & Recreation Fees for 2024 E.Request for Purchase: Edina Art Center Schematic Design Services F.Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Zoning Code Audit G.Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1 for ENG 21-9NB Nine Mile Creek Vegetation Management Oversight H.Request for Purchase: 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure I.Request for Purchase: 50th and France Security Cameras and Storage J.Approve 2024 City Observances/Days of SigniBcance K.Approve 2024 Calendar of Meeting and Religious Observance Dates L.Approve Summary Publication for Ordinance No. 2023-18: Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: November 25, 2023 as Small Business Saturday in Edina VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staD and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eEcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-85: Vacating Transit Easement at 3501 Galleria IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2023-87: Accepting Donations B.Resolution No. 2023-80: 4917 Eden Avenue, Maison Green, Sign Variance Appeal C.Approve Design Option 1A for Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge D.Approve Next Steps for Organized Trash Collection for Single Family Dwellings E.Sketch Plan Review for 4600 West 77th Street X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Advisory Communication: Organized Trash Collection B.Advisory Communication: Organized Trash Collection C.Minutes: Community Health Commission, June 12, July 10, August 14, 2023 D.Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission September 12, 2023 E.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, October 12, 2023 XI.Manager's Comments A.Quarterly Financial Report and Progress Portal Updates B.Future of Operator-Assisted Calls for Public Meetings XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliBcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous Council meeting. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Nov. 8, 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft City Council Work Session, Nov. 8, 2023 Minutes: Draft City Council Regular Minutes, Nov. 8, 2023 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2023 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Agnew, Jackson and Risser and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner; Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator; Ryan Browning, I.T. Director; Laura Fulton, Recreation Supervisor; Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager; MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Specialist; Jake Miller, I.T. Specialist; Scott Neal, City Manager; Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner; Gillian Straub, City Management Fellow; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; and Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director. WORK PLANS Community Engagement Manager MJ Lamon reviewed the process for developing annual work plans and the considerations that went into development of them for boards and commissions. She and City Manager Scott Neal then went through each of them, highlighting staff recommendations made since they were initially presented to the Council by chairs of the advisory groups: Arts & Culture Commission Human Rights & Relations Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Transportation Commission Energy & Environment Commission Planning Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Community Health Commission Council asked questions and provided feedback. Neal reminded the group that staff would incorporate feedback from the City Council and plans to bring the board and commission work plans back for approval at the Dec. 6 City Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:46 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, _____________________________________ Jennifer L. Bennerotte, Communications Director Minutes approved by the Edina City Council Nov. 21, 2023. _____________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 8, 2023 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland. Absent: Member Pierce. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, shared safety concerns regarding the construction project at 4404 Valley View Road and proximity of the power poles in relation to the units. She spoke about Xcel Energy’s 12-foot rule with relation to windows then shared photos of power pole proximity to the building and about an incident that occurred in another area of the country that resulted in death. She then displayed a model that outlined the power pole proximity that could result in a power arc and injury. Owen Michaelson, 4520 West 56th Street, shared the November 7 election was conducted by Edina for the school district at a cost of $150,000, and schools were responsible for the fee. He said he presented at a recent school board meeting this information and the resulting comments by the school board chair who felt the amount should not be paid as there was an election already in place. He asked who was the responsible party for the school district election and if the district was at odds with the City’s interpretation of the fee. He added the residents need to understand who was responsible for election costs. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal responded to past Community Comments then spoke about Mr. Michaelson’s concerns regarding election fees. He explained the City entered into a one-year agreement with the school district for elections which included a cap of $150,000 and the City’s pledge to track time and expenses for the district. He said the cap was in an up to amount, could be less, and staff was working to collect all costs. He noted staff would also follow up on potential safety concerns regarding the construction project at 4404 Valley View Road as raised by Ms. Westin. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Member Risser made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item VI.L., Traffic Safety Report of September 26, 2023, as follows: VI.A. Approve Minutes of the Worksession and Regular Meeting of October 17, 2023 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 13, 2023-1 totaling $153,577.48; Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 16, 2023-1 totaling $78,247.28, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.16.23-2 TOTAL $1,310,875.84, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 18, 2023-1 totaling $1,657.92, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 18, 2023-2 totaling $5,257.23, Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2023 Page 2 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 20, 2023, totaling $2,112,778.15, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 27, 2023, totaling $5,466.18, and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 30, 2023, totaling $2,057,397.86 VI.C. Request for Purchase; Institution Community Work Crew Contract, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, State of Minnesota, $210,000 VI.D. Request for Purchase; Courtney Baseball Fields #2-4 Sports Lighting, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Electro Mechanical Contractors, $103,980 and Musco Corporation, $359,000 VI.E. Waive Building Permit Fees for Courtney Baseball Fields #2-4 Sports Lighting VI.F. Receive Advisory Report; Arts and Culture Initiative, Street Art Policy and Practices VI.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-78; Setting Public Improvement Hearing Date for Concord B and C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction VI.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-79; Setting Public Improvement Hearing Date for Southdale B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction VI.I. Request for Purchase, Professional Services for 50th and Grange Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Short Elliot Hendrickson, $246,000 VI.J. Request for Purchase, Promenade Pumping System Professional Services, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Kimley Horn, $30,176.00 VI.K. Request for Purchase, Senior Center Water Intrusion Investigation and Repair, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Rachel Contracting, $33,365 VI.L. Traffic Safety Report of September 26, 2023 VI.M. Request for Purchase, Neptune 360 H2O Meter Software and Hardware, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, $24,980 VI.N. Request for Purchase, Replacement of a Submersible Cable for Well 2, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons, $21,500 VI.O. Request for Purchase, 911 Radio and Phone Recorder Replacement, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northland Business Systems, $27,905 VI.P. Request for Purchase, Handheld Robots, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Recon Robotics, Inc., $77,996 VI.Q. Request for Purchase, Two 2024 Chevy Electric Blazers, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, North Country GM, $122,837 VI.R. Request for Purchase, 2024 Doge Durango, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Dodge of Burnsville, $39,371 VI.S. Request for Purchase, Adobe Software Subscriptions, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, LOGIS, $25,671 VI.T. Request for Purchase, Fire Toughbook Replacements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Baycom, $64,518 VI.U. Request for Purchase, Fire Station 1 Fitness Equipment, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, 2nd Wind Exercise Equipment Inc., $24,314 VI.V. Approve 2024-2025 Union Contract for LELS Local 486 Sergeants VI.W. Approve 2024-2025 Union Contract for LELS Local 498 Patrol Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA VI.L. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 – RECEIVED The Council noted the City would be installing a warning sign for eastbound traffic for the Grandview Square area as recommended in the traffic safety report. Director of Engineering Millner shared the report noted pedestrians had pushed the crosswalk button 46% of the time and that 95% of cars stopped when the lights flashed and encouraged pedestrians to continue to use the button to safely cross the intersection. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to receive the Traffic Safety Report of September 26, 2023. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2023 Page 3 Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. DECLARING NOVEMBER 19 WORLD DAY OF REMEMBRANCE FOR ROAD TRAFFIC VICTIMS – PROCLAIMED Member Risser made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to proclaim November 19 World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims in the City of Edina. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Member Risser shared about her loss of a loved one through road traffic violence, the importance of this proclamation, and ways to reduce crashes through messaging and public education. She noted Edina had lost many people in the past year as a result of reckless and inattentive driving and encouraged everyone to pay attention for the safety of staff and the entire public. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-80; 4917 EDEN AVENUE, MAISON GREEN, SIGN VARIANCE APPEAL – CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 21, 2023 Assistant City Planner Boedecker shared that Edina resident Tom Tessman had appealed the Planning Commission’s decision to the City Council for an additional 39.9-square foot wall sign for Maison Green. She explained the PUD-21 zoning allowed signage on one wall sign for maximum of 12 square feet and that the applicant wanted an additional lighted sign on the south side in the amount of 39.9 square feet. She spoke about the practical difficulties shared by the applicant for reasonable use and that staff believed the request was reasonable given site’s unique location on Highway 100 and that granting the variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. She shared the Planning Commission approved the variance request unanimously and requested the Council hold the public hearing and continue action until the November 21 meeting. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. City Attorney Kendall responded to questions of the Council that said approval of a variance would not create a precedent as each request had to be evaluated individually on its own merits. He noted while future applicants might refer to any variance approval regardless, the Council was not bound on decisions for future requests as a result of past requests. Dianne Blake, 5017 Yvonne Terrace, said they were residents and engaged members of Edina and offered perspective that seemed to be lacking from the Planning Commission. She argued the sign code did not meet statute requirements and spoke about reasonable, uniqueness, and essential character. She stated the claim that without signage the building would not be recognized was not reasonable as the building scale was very large and the public was able to locate other buildings on Highway 100 already, including through the use of GPS. She said no request was made for signage on the north side of the complex and felt this property was not unique as there were multiple buildings already in the Grandview area. Tom Tessman, 5017 Yvonne Terrace, spoke about essential character and felt nearby residents would be subjected to an illuminated sign 24/7 then shared photos of other buildings and their current signage. He said they believed the variance requirements had not been met regarding reasonableness, uniqueness, and essential character and that a variance for an additional, large-scale illuminated sign broke the established precedent and undermined the City’s climate action plan. Bjorn Bowman, Serigraphics Sign Systems, said the building was not easily visible at night and spoke to the scale being very understated. He said the sign copy would be the only portion lit as the background would be opaque and residents would see no light pollution. He said he believed this was not an overly large sign then shared how the brightness could be adjusted to control the lumens if necessary as well as hours as the Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2023 Page 4 sign would likely be on a timer. He believed the sign would be similar to lighting coming from an actual apartment unit and supported the variance. The Council requested the property owner appear at the November 21, 2023, Council meeting with the reasons for the variance request. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. Public Testimony Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Daniel Eaton, 5712 Parkwood Lane, addressed the Council. Susan Lee, 6708 Pointe Drive, addressed the Council. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the public hearing on November 12, 2023, and continue action on Resolution No. 2023-80, 4917 Eden Avenue, Maison Green, Sign Variance Appeal, to the November 21, 2023, meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-81; ACCEPTING DONATIONS - ADOPTED Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-81, accepting donations. Seconded by Member Agnew. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. IX.B. SKETCH PLAN FOR 6600-6800 FRANCE AVENUE – REVIEWED Community Development Director Teague shared the applicants, Wildamere, Olympus Ventures, and HGA Architects were requesting consideration of a sketch plan review to redevelop a portion of the 22-acre parcel at 6600-6800 France. The applicants brought two sketch plan alternatives to the Planning Commission for review on September 27, 2023 and based on feedback had revised plans for Council consideration. The proposal now was to rezone the site back to the original zoning classification of POD, Planned Office District from the current PUD. The plans still included demolition of the middle buildings on the site (6750, 6740 and 6700 France) and construct a 3-4 story 85,000 square-foot medical office building and 8,500 square-foot restaurant. He said if a formal application was made the applicants had stated that they would bring forward a Code compliant plan with the POD standards. Mr. Teague noted setbacks shown on the revised plans appear to be code compliant with the POD Ordinance and more detailed plans would be required with a formal application to ensure code compliance. Shawn Smith, Wildamere, said they had been working on this project since 2008 and shared how many of Wildamere and Olympus Venture staff lived in the community and were excited to propose new 3-story, 85,000 square-foot medical building and 8,500 square-foot restaurant and associated parking structures. He said the project would be similar to the 2017 PUD Phase IV then shared two options for sketch plan for Planning Commission review. He said after consideration of building the PUD against constraints and stakeholder concerns they concluded the best course was to revert back to the POD zoning and create a medical building and not a typical office building. He said they were in support of the City and Chamber’s goals to create this area as medical destination with access to grade, covered parking options, and internal access to amenities. He spoke about the need for greater plumbing/electrical infrastructure and how the site was unique in overall size and constraints and challenges through commitments of existing tenants. He spoke about key sight lines maintenance, easement maintenance and preserving existing tree growth and how they intended to improve connectivity and visibility and incorporate the City’s guidelines for a gateway Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2023 Page 5 project for the south France Avenue corridor. He spoke about increased medical access and the desire to welcome employees, residents and visitors to the Southdale neighborhood. He shared a general overview of the existing site conditions, outlined proposed parking, then spoke about easements that would serve the campus, the existing high-water tables and the resulting challenges with the goal of having a $50-$60 million investment for Southdale. Jason Vanslo, HGA, said he had worked on the project since 2019 and was a result of years to revitalize a cornerstone site. He spoke about creating a connected cohesive campus and keep the 6600 and 6800 buildings viable and thriving. He referred to the sensitivity to the adjacent Cornelius neighborhood and the goal to provide sufficient parking in recognition of the spirit of the Greater Southdale Area Guidelines. He said the project would serve both remote users and local residents to connect to a broader community that had pedestrian friendly parking experiences and would work to buffer internal traffic impacts and eliminate the right-out exit onto France Avenue to make the area more pedestrian-friendly. He referred to massing of the parking structure that was thoroughly studied and building placement and parking to support the goals of overall reduction of the site and generate a more engaging public realm. Mr. Vanslo shared further comments regarding the proposed project and outlined in detail the resulting public benefits of the project and how the project followed the Greater Southdale District Plan guidelines which included reduced density, elimination of hotel, residential and retail and reduced building square footage, then spoke more about the goals of the parking structure and their request for 150 more stalls for future phases. Shawn Smith, Wildamere, recognized the importance of building a project that reflected the quality of the surrounding neighborhood and the Southdale District and invited the Council to a tour the site to better outline the constraints and thanked them for their time and consideration. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. IX.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2023-82; UPDATE TO GATEWAY ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) – ADOPTED Mr. Teague shared the Gateway Study Area was approximately 135 acres, bounded by Highway 100 on the west, France Avenue on the east, 76th Street West, and the former Fred Richards Golf Course on the north, and Edina’s border with Bloomington on the south. The Study Area currently contained a mixture of light industrial/warehouse, commercial, office and residential uses with a total of 1,904,000 gross square feet (gsf) of these uses in the original existing conditions. The City adopted the final AUAR on November 5, 2007, and the City updated it in September 2013 and August 2018. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 Subp. 7, for the AUAR to remain valid as the environmental review document for the area, the document needed to be updated every five years until all development in the study area had received final approval. Since not all redevelopment had received approval in the study area and another five years had passed, the purpose of this document was to update the AUAR pursuant to Minnesota Rules. Andi Moffatt, WSB, shared they conducted the original AUAR in 2007 and presented further updates to the Council that included the purpose was for a study area and not a specific development. She outlined the area included 135 acres of the Gateway Area and how the State reviewed document similar to an EAW that evaluated different development scenarios, included a mitigation plan, and provided a wider view of the area. She said the AUAR was valid and when an area redeveloped a guide plan was in place and a separate EAW was not needed. Ms. Moffatt spoke about what’s involved in an AUAR that evaluated what had developed, stated mitigation measures, updated the environmental review, and provided a 10-day agency and public comment period which recently ended. She outlined the comments received were in keeping with others with no significant issues and that some revisions were made as a result and suggested the Council adopt the AUAR update through 2023 and to continue updating as long as necessary then noted the addition of greenhouse gas analysis to the AUAR. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 8, 2023 Page 6 Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2023-82, adopting the final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Update for the Gateway Study Area. Seconded by Member Risser. Rollcall: Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. X. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) – Received X.A. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 X.B. MINUTES: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 X.C. MINUTES: ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, AUGUST 24 AND SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 X.D. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 2, 2023 XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XI.A. CITY MANAGER ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:53 p.m. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 21, 2023. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 8, 2023, meeting available. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Claims for Payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 11.03.23 TOTAL $1,527,012.76 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 11.03.23 TOTAL $115,275.67 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 11.10.23 TOTAL $1,318,626.52 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 11.03.23 TOTAL $1,527,012.76 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 11.03.23 TOTAL $115,275.67 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 11.10.23 TOTAL $1,318,626.52 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 214,557.572100 Police Special Revenue 1,012.502300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 20,490.302500 Conservation & Sustainability 399,253.732600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 4,111.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 172.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 13,074.452600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 106,309.203000 Debt Service 14,237.504000 Capital Projects 293,746.534200 Equipment Replacement 14,428.114400 PIR Capital Projects 57,054.225100 Art Center 563.865200 Braemar Golf Course 5,584.675200 Braemar Golf Course 11.355300 Aquatic Center 618.915400 Edinborough Park 2,552.975500 Braemar Arena 42,317.475700 Centennial Lakes 1,493.355800 Liquor 135,314.025900 Utility Fund 23,667.735900 Utility Fund 519,161.365900 Utility Fund 61,074.655900 Utility Fund 68,070.006000 Risk Management 675.516100 Equipment Operations 19,078.396200 Information Technology 15,054.726300 Facilities Management 6,213.097100 PS Training Facility 624.459999 Pooled Cash Fund 2,040,180.11 TOTAL 2,040,180.11 2,040,180.11 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Mallory Schauer ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 116 11/01/2023 WIRE 112118 US BANK 2388393 10/03/2023 14,237.50 CHECK 116 TOTAL: 14,237.50 122 11/01/2023 WIRE 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 0001163175 10/02/2023 498,929.85 CHECK 122 TOTAL: 498,929.85 489645 11/03/2023 PRTD 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM AARP #C23858 10/12/2023 20231102 330.00 CHECK 489645 TOTAL: 330.00 489646 11/03/2023 PRTD 133483 ACTIVE911 INC 521250 10/05/2023 20231102 1,012.50 CHECK 489646 TOTAL: 1,012.50 489647 11/03/2023 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916708307 10/16/2023 20231102 125.92 CHECK 489647 TOTAL: 125.92 489648 11/03/2023 PRTD 120796 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS C147668 10/06/2023 20231102 202.00 CHECK 489648 TOTAL: 202.00 489649 11/03/2023 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 17682 10/17/2023 20231102 53.80 CHECK 489649 TOTAL: 53.80 489650 11/03/2023 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XKG-KJD7-16HJ 10/05/2023 20231102 54.83 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WN4-74F7-3GVF 10/05/2023 20231102 130.16 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LXK-36MQ-1Y7P 10/05/2023 20231102 -729.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L4K-LDLY-4FCD 10/05/2023 20231102 101.02 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1W11-L4F7-9DDT 10/05/2023 20231102 7.69 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19L4-JPTC-D1VV 10/06/2023 20231102 47.70 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YWY-GDXG-D3P1 10/06/2023 20231102 9.58 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1P6V-MDYN-FJ9N 10/06/2023 20231102 72.31 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XNN-QMWP-GN63 10/06/2023 20231102 240.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XG9-G7RK-HNMK 10/06/2023 20231102 12.83 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HLW-CMG9-K9PX 10/07/2023 20231102 20.15 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JPG-RPH3-M44C 10/08/2023 20231102 252.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WN4-74F7-MYKD 10/08/2023 20231102 99.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19W4-3P4P-Q13T 10/09/2023 20231102 121.02 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13QW-TTJX-R91N 10/09/2023 20231102 17.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XKG-KJD7-VQLW 10/09/2023 20231102 25.79 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1P4H-G4RM-XXPN 10/09/2023 20231102 -126.38 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TMK-JQJQ-Y3NY 10/09/2023 20231102 177.13 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NFQ-76FY-1R9R 10/10/2023 20231102 31.75 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TMP-3XLG-6494 10/10/2023 20231102 64.37 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VXQ-NGK3-6GYC 10/10/2023 20231102 16.74 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11V1-3MMC-7KDR 10/10/2023 20231102 -12.83 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CXF-Q7LJ-CQ33 10/10/2023 20231102 249.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FNV-WY6V-CVHL 10/10/2023 20231102 17.90 CHECK 489650 TOTAL: 901.94 489651 11/03/2023 PRTD 160869 AMERICAN AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION 413053 09/16/2023 20231102 1,932.16 CHECK 489651 TOTAL: 1,932.16 489652 11/03/2023 PRTD 132360 AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION INC FC-20-05 #7 09/07/2023 20231102 25,283.81 CHECK 489652 TOTAL: 25,283.81 489653 11/03/2023 PRTD 101874 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 116758 08/25/2023 20231102 12,840.50 CHECK 489653 TOTAL: 12,840.50 489654 11/03/2023 PRTD 143763 VALLEY APPLE FORD INC A1CB363491 10/06/2023 20231102 195.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489654 TOTAL: 195.00 489655 11/03/2023 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500327886 10/02/2023 20231102 265.85 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500328364 10/03/2023 20231102 253.91 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500328378 10/03/2023 20231102 147.36 CHECK 489655 TOTAL: 667.12 489656 11/03/2023 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1224 10/19/2023 20231102 84.00 CHECK 489656 TOTAL: 84.00 489657 11/03/2023 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 319811 09/19/2023 20231102 258.50 ASPEN MILLS INC 320879 10/06/2023 20231102 407.20 CHECK 489657 TOTAL: 665.70 489658 11/03/2023 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-000713 10/06/2023 20231102 214.06 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-000992 10/06/2023 20231102 19.44 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-001689 10/09/2023 20231102 22.59 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-003127 10/13/2023 20231102 64.58 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-003231 10/13/2023 20231102 19.52 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-003791 10/16/2023 20231102 180.87 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-003794 10/16/2023 20231102 132.07 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 989800DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -261.23 CHECK 489658 TOTAL: 391.90 489659 11/03/2023 PRTD 125333 BARNUM COMPANIES INC 38361 10/10/2023 20231102 645.72 CHECK 489659 TOTAL: 645.72 489660 11/03/2023 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.01 - 18 10/06/2023 20231102 6,180.09 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.02 - 12 10/06/2023 20231102 2,974.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.03 - 7 10/06/2023 20231102 6,487.13 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23270354.23-8 10/06/2023 20231102 8,047.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271892.00-12 10/06/2023 20231102 921.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271913.01 - 8 10/06/2023 20231102 3,069.00 CHECK 489660 TOTAL: 27,678.72 489661 11/03/2023 PRTD 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LMV426547 10/11/2023 20231102 299.82 CHECK 489661 TOTAL: 299.82 489662 11/03/2023 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0201240500 10/19/2023 20231102 2,840.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0201240300 10/19/2023 20231102 227.71 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107510900 10/19/2023 20231102 133.86 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107510700 10/19/2023 20231102 53.39 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0201239600 10/19/2023 20231102 1,077.90 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0201238200 10/19/2023 20231102 762.00 CHECK 489662 TOTAL: 5,094.86 489663 11/03/2023 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5195818 10/10/2023 20231102 870.00 CHECK 489663 TOTAL: 870.00 489664 11/03/2023 PRTD 160787 THE NETWORK FOR BETTER FUTURES INV1354 09/29/2023 20231102 22,266.00 CHECK 489664 TOTAL: 22,266.00 489665 11/03/2023 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24635 10/18/2023 20231102 152.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24639 10/18/2023 20231102 840.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24638 10/18/2023 20231102 466.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24636 10/18/2023 20231102 126.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24637 10/18/2023 20231102 352.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489665 TOTAL: 1,936.00 489666 11/03/2023 PRTD 160721 BLAKE, PATRICIA 1167454 10/09/2023 20231102 90.00 BLAKE, PATRICIA 1164493 10/09/2023 20231102 90.00 CHECK 489666 TOTAL: 180.00 489667 11/03/2023 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0321347 09/29/2023 20231102 4,874.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 0320975 09/26/2023 20231102 2,287.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0321567 09/29/2023 20231102 2,432.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0321568 09/29/2023 20231102 10,896.50 CHECK 489667 TOTAL: 20,490.00 489668 11/03/2023 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 200862 10/17/2023 20231102 1,628.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 200863 10/17/2023 20231102 948.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 200864 10/17/2023 20231102 714.00 CHECK 489668 TOTAL: 3,290.00 489669 11/03/2023 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1862 10/06/2023 20231102 211.95 CHECK 489669 TOTAL: 211.95 489670 11/03/2023 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626874 10/18/2023 20231102 1,717.08 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626875 10/18/2023 20231102 3,112.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626851 10/18/2023 20231102 197.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112622538 10/18/2023 20231102 901.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112625822 10/18/2023 20231102 1,983.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626852 10/18/2023 20231102 678.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626877 10/18/2023 20231102 404.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112624040 10/18/2023 20231102 901.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626876 10/18/2023 20231102 181.15 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626878 10/18/2023 20231102 121.15 CHECK 489670 TOTAL: 10,198.23 489671 11/03/2023 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604146 10/17/2023 20231102 2,549.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604141 10/17/2023 20231102 267.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604142 10/17/2023 20231102 30.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604140 10/17/2023 20231102 4,352.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604143 10/17/2023 20231102 5,505.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604144 10/17/2023 20231102 203.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112604145 10/17/2023 20231102 30.80 CHECK 489671 TOTAL: 12,940.75 489672 11/03/2023 PRTD 150972 BROKEN CLOCK BREWING COOPERATIVE 8187 10/18/2023 20231102 164.00 CHECK 489672 TOTAL: 164.00 489673 11/03/2023 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1264121-1 10/05/2023 20231102 68.54 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1264340-1 10/06/2023 20231102 14.28 CHECK 489673 TOTAL: 82.82 489674 11/03/2023 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2902381 10/18/2023 20231102 720.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2902382 10/18/2023 20231102 -78.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2902383 10/18/2023 20231102 196.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2901462 10/18/2023 20231102 -13.20 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2902384 10/18/2023 20231102 1,141.95 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2901461 10/18/2023 20231102 -10.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2903457 10/20/2023 20231102 477.20 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2903456 10/20/2023 20231102 480.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2903453 10/20/2023 20231102 480.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489674 TOTAL: 3,394.20 489675 11/03/2023 PRTD 148017 CARBON DAY AUTOMOTIVE 109A 10/09/2023 20231102 12,333.00 CARBON DAY AUTOMOTIVE 109B 10/09/2023 20231102 7,883.00 CARBON DAY AUTOMOTIVE 109C 10/09/2023 20231102 15,720.00 CHECK 489675 TOTAL: 35,936.00 489676 11/03/2023 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 23269 10/10/2023 20231102 4,733.33 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 23317 10/16/2023 20231102 1,755.00 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 23199DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -1,158.75 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 23152DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -172.00 CHECK 489676 TOTAL: 5,157.58 489677 11/03/2023 PRTD 160160 CHRISTIANSON'S BUSINESS FURNITURE 87495 10/16/2023 20231102 1,659.35 CHECK 489677 TOTAL: 1,659.35 489678 11/03/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4169882076 10/05/2023 20231102 35.04 CINTAS CORPORATION 4169882064 10/05/2023 20231102 14.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4169882063 10/05/2023 20231102 6.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4170133189 10/09/2023 20231102 181.49 CHECK 489678 TOTAL: 236.53 489679 11/03/2023 PRTD 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 22801 10/16/2023 20231102 101,000.00 CHECK 489679 TOTAL: 101,000.00 489680 11/03/2023 PRTD 101837 COMMUNICATIONS COM-2898 10/12/2023 20231102 100.00 CHECK 489680 TOTAL: 100.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489681 11/03/2023 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 714212 10/17/2023 20231102 334.43 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 714757 10/19/2023 20231102 278.50 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 714829 10/19/2023 20231102 524.15 CHECK 489681 TOTAL: 1,137.08 489682 11/03/2023 PRTD 100012 CORE & MAIN T710204 10/05/2023 20231102 5,188.32 CORE & MAIN T576814DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -911.00 CHECK 489682 TOTAL: 4,277.32 489683 11/03/2023 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4143759 10/09/2023 20231102 269.25 CHECK 489683 TOTAL: 269.25 489684 11/03/2023 PRTD 160780 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1474 10/18/2023 20231102 420.00 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1490 10/19/2023 20231102 630.00 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1492 10/19/2023 20231102 280.00 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1491 10/19/2023 20231102 288.00 CHECK 489684 TOTAL: 1,618.00 489685 11/03/2023 PRTD 143088 DARTS SI0008260 09/30/2023 20231102 6,250.00 CHECK 489685 TOTAL: 6,250.00 489686 11/03/2023 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 326022/1 10/05/2023 20231102 281.51 CHECK 489686 TOTAL: 281.51 489687 11/03/2023 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 051616649X230620 06/20/2023 20231102 -146.34 DIRECTV GROUP INC 051616649X231020 10/20/2023 20231102 157.69 CHECK 489687 TOTAL: 11.35 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489688 11/03/2023 PRTD 160849 DISRUPTIFY INC 20231002-04 10/02/2023 20231102 5,000.00 CHECK 489688 TOTAL: 5,000.00 489689 11/03/2023 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3916102 10/10/2023 20231102 1,643.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3916103 10/10/2023 20231102 1,949.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3916105 10/10/2023 20231102 519.00 CHECK 489689 TOTAL: 4,111.50 489690 11/03/2023 PRTD 129079 DRAIN KING INC 119927 10/05/2023 20231102 462.00 CHECK 489690 TOTAL: 462.00 489691 11/03/2023 PRTD 102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC A26536 09/11/2023 22200049 20231102 29,428.00 CHECK 489691 TOTAL: 29,428.00 489692 11/03/2023 PRTD 160746 EQUITY BUILDERS & CONSTRUCTION SE ENG22-108 #3 10/06/2023 20231102 125,910.65 CHECK 489692 TOTAL: 125,910.65 489693 11/03/2023 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-11991 10/19/2023 20231102 141.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-12002 10/19/2023 20231102 141.00 CHECK 489693 TOTAL: 282.00 489694 11/03/2023 PRTD 116492 BRIDGETOWER OPCO, LLC 745626145 07/20/2023 20231102 141.51 CHECK 489694 TOTAL: 141.51 489695 11/03/2023 PRTD 160445 FULLY INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY MEDIC 21 10/05/2023 20231102 7,200.00 CHECK 489695 TOTAL: 7,200.00 489696 11/03/2023 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1971212 10/05/2023 20231102 6.54 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1971436 10/06/2023 20231102 1,169.77 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1972205 10/09/2023 20231102 1,691.28 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1972569 10/09/2023 20231102 53.68 CHECK 489696 TOTAL: 2,921.27 489697 11/03/2023 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9864216727 10/09/2023 20231102 39.17 CHECK 489697 TOTAL: 39.17 489698 11/03/2023 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6598902 10/10/2023 20231102 4,112.80 CHECK 489698 TOTAL: 4,112.80 489699 11/03/2023 PRTD 160008 RACHEL PETERSON 3306 10/06/2023 20231102 1,442.03 CHECK 489699 TOTAL: 1,442.03 489700 11/03/2023 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 243719 10/10/2023 20231102 3,975.85 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 243718 10/10/2023 20231102 2,189.25 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 243717 10/10/2023 20231102 744.07 CHECK 489700 TOTAL: 6,909.17 489701 11/03/2023 PRTD 160637 HGS LLC IN41236 10/08/2023 20231102 3,026.25 CHECK 489701 TOTAL: 3,026.25 489702 11/03/2023 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 655929 10/17/2023 20231102 1,611.75 HOHENSTEINS INC 655934 10/17/2023 20231102 546.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 655928 10/17/2023 20231102 958.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 655926 10/17/2023 20231102 731.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 655933 10/17/2023 20231102 1,758.15 HOHENSTEINS INC 655932 10/17/2023 20231102 51.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 655931 10/17/2023 20231102 546.00 CHECK 489702 TOTAL: 6,202.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489703 11/03/2023 PRTD 160239 HUEBSCH LAUNDRY CO 20263385 10/09/2023 20231102 214.49 CHECK 489703 TOTAL: 214.49 489704 11/03/2023 PRTD 160559 HUMERATECH INC 230617 10/10/2023 20231102 152,992.27 HUMERATECH INC 230686 10/10/2023 20231102 199,082.56 CHECK 489704 TOTAL: 352,074.83 489705 11/03/2023 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 17137 10/18/2023 20231102 190.00 CHECK 489705 TOTAL: 190.00 489706 11/03/2023 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 6673448 10/17/2023 20231102 53.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3635879 10/19/2023 20231102 433.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3635877 10/19/2023 20231102 433.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3635880 10/19/2023 20231102 433.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3635881 10/19/2023 20231102 1,784.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3635878 10/19/2023 20231102 1,704.40 CHECK 489706 TOTAL: 4,843.50 489707 11/03/2023 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677087 10/19/2023 20231102 3,888.81 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677084 10/19/2023 20231102 220.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677086 10/19/2023 20231102 829.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677085 10/19/2023 20231102 972.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677083 10/19/2023 20231102 1,321.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677091 10/19/2023 20231102 1,400.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677089 10/19/2023 20231102 220.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677088 10/19/2023 20231102 1,171.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677090 10/19/2023 20231102 1,256.94 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489707 TOTAL: 11,283.35 489708 11/03/2023 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7447272 10/19/2023 20231102 649.60 CHECK 489708 TOTAL: 649.60 489709 11/03/2023 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406991 10/19/2023 20231102 1,865.48 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406992 10/19/2023 20231102 947.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406996 10/19/2023 20231102 263.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407001 10/19/2023 20231102 2,441.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407007 10/19/2023 20231102 249.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406997 10/19/2023 20231102 635.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2402475 10/19/2023 20231102 2,573.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406989 10/19/2023 20231102 466.30 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407000 10/19/2023 20231102 1,422.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406994 10/19/2023 20231102 2,763.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406988 10/19/2023 20231102 76.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 267086 09/08/2023 20231102 -13.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 263652 08/11/2023 20231102 -13.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407008 10/19/2023 20231102 608.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407009 10/19/2023 20231102 975.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406998 10/19/2023 20231102 657.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406993 10/19/2023 20231102 590.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406999 10/19/2023 20231102 475.30 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407003 10/19/2023 20231102 499.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407010 10/19/2023 20231102 349.80 CHECK 489709 TOTAL: 17,836.09 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489710 11/03/2023 PRTD 160880 JOHNSTON, DAVID 10/06/2023 10/06/2023 20231102 110.00 CHECK 489710 TOTAL: 110.00 489711 11/03/2023 PRTD 160737 WEYAND COMPANIES LLC 000488 10/08/2023 20231102 100.00 CHECK 489711 TOTAL: 100.00 489712 11/03/2023 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 6680 10/17/2023 20231102 80.00 CHECK 489712 TOTAL: 80.00 489713 11/03/2023 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 01-1030530 10/11/2023 22300021 20231102 63,321.59 CHECK 489713 TOTAL: 63,321.59 489714 11/03/2023 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310981630 10/07/2023 20231102 754.29 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310981629 10/07/2023 20231102 226.23 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310921495DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -939.43 CHECK 489714 TOTAL: 41.09 489715 11/03/2023 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 314543 10/10/2023 20231102 675.51 CHECK 489715 TOTAL: 675.51 489716 11/03/2023 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 63638 10/17/2023 20231102 1,248.32 LIBATION PROJECT 63645 10/17/2023 20231102 522.16 LIBATION PROJECT 63646 10/17/2023 20231102 991.96 LIBATION PROJECT 63810 10/19/2023 20231102 130.04 CHECK 489716 TOTAL: 2,892.48 489717 11/03/2023 PRTD 144426 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS LLC LQ-000275 08/31/2023 20231102 1,160.29 CHECK 489717 TOTAL: 1,160.29 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489718 11/03/2023 PRTD 117026 LIFE-ASSIST INC 1370617 10/10/2023 20231102 88.00 CHECK 489718 TOTAL: 88.00 489719 11/03/2023 PRTD 160779 NORTH CO 2023-250266 10/05/2023 20231102 980.00 CHECK 489719 TOTAL: 980.00 489720 11/03/2023 PRTD 160548 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-1850 10/19/2023 20231102 330.00 CHECK 489720 TOTAL: 330.00 489721 11/03/2023 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 56528 10/17/2023 20231102 354.50 CHECK 489721 TOTAL: 354.50 489722 11/03/2023 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 124821 10/07/2023 20231102 512.00 CHECK 489722 TOTAL: 512.00 489723 11/03/2023 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 24700427 10/09/2023 20231102 17,519.73 CHECK 489723 TOTAL: 17,519.73 489724 11/03/2023 PRTD 116410 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40364654 09/13/2023 20231102 20,257.68 CHECK 489724 TOTAL: 20,257.68 489725 11/03/2023 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1090552 10/18/2023 20231102 469.02 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1090544 10/18/2023 20231102 301.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1090569/1090577 10/18/2023 20231102 609.00 CHECK 489725 TOTAL: 1,379.52 489726 11/03/2023 PRTD 146040 STRAYER, JUSTIN IN-4728 10/18/2023 20231102 568.95 STRAYER, JUSTIN IN-4713 10/18/2023 20231102 132.00 CHECK 489726 TOTAL: 700.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489727 11/03/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 90357 10/05/2023 20231102 108.00 CHECK 489727 TOTAL: 108.00 489728 11/03/2023 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 12845 10/19/2023 20231102 510.00 CHECK 489728 TOTAL: 510.00 489729 11/03/2023 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180243858 10/09/2023 20231102 12.96 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180243859 10/01/2023 20231102 24.85 CHECK 489729 TOTAL: 37.81 489730 11/03/2023 PRTD 160621 MINNESOTA AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION 00353 10/05/2023 20231102 4,400.00 CHECK 489730 TOTAL: 4,400.00 489731 11/03/2023 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT P06044 10/06/2023 20231102 91.83 CHECK 489731 TOTAL: 91.83 489732 11/03/2023 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35126 08/25/2023 20231102 12.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35314 10/07/2023 20231102 109.37 CHECK 489732 TOTAL: 121.37 489733 11/03/2023 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45386 10/17/2023 20231102 543.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45347 10/17/2023 20231102 116.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45346 10/17/2023 20231102 246.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45385 10/17/2023 20231102 362.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45345 10/18/2023 20231102 130.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45384 10/18/2023 20231102 362.00 CHECK 489733 TOTAL: 1,759.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489734 11/03/2023 PRTD 160876 MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION IN 2023 GOLF FUNDRAISER09/20/2023 20231102 750.00 CHECK 489734 TOTAL: 750.00 489735 11/03/2023 PRTD 132591 MUSKA ELECTRIC COMPANY 53145 09/01/2023 20231102 586.10 CHECK 489735 TOTAL: 586.10 489736 11/03/2023 PRTD 100683 CHEMSEARCH 8417742 10/07/2023 20231102 815.06 CHECK 489736 TOTAL: 815.06 489737 11/03/2023 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 212833 10/18/2023 20231102 618.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 212832 10/18/2023 20231102 474.00 CHECK 489737 TOTAL: 1,092.00 489738 11/03/2023 PRTD 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 20-23.5CA 10/13/2023 20231102 977.50 CHECK 489738 TOTAL: 977.50 489739 11/03/2023 PRTD 999999 WANGLER, MATT LIQ DELIVERY-WANGLER05/01/2020 20231102 21.01 CHECK 489739 TOTAL: 21.01 489740 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 4630 France Ave LLC ED198145-Refund 10/09/2023 20231102 10,000.00 CHECK 489740 TOTAL: 10,000.00 489741 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 Bollig & Sons ED206805-Refund 10/19/2023 20231102 2,500.00 CHECK 489741 TOTAL: 2,500.00 489742 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 KEYSTONE BUILDERS INC ED209353-Refund 10/12/2023 20231102 103.56 CHECK 489742 TOTAL: 103.56 489743 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 NR Properties Inc ED194451-Refund 10/11/2023 20231102 9,700.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489743 TOTAL: 9,700.00 489744 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 Rascher, Tim ED192758-Refund 10/19/2023 20231102 2,000.00 CHECK 489744 TOTAL: 2,000.00 489745 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 SCHERBER COMPANIES ED207352-Refund 10/11/2023 20231102 2,500.00 CHECK 489745 TOTAL: 2,500.00 489746 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 TC HOMEBUILDERS, INC ED191177-Refund 10/11/2023 20231102 9,560.00 CHECK 489746 TOTAL: 9,560.00 489747 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 Timothy Ford ED198972-Refund 10/16/2023 20231102 2,000.00 CHECK 489747 TOTAL: 2,000.00 489748 11/03/2023 PRTD 999995 Turner Bros Inc ED207371-Refund 10/09/2023 20231102 2,500.00 CHECK 489748 TOTAL: 2,500.00 489749 11/03/2023 PRTD 999994 Cichys Water and Sewer Service ED208391-Refund 09/20/2023 20231102 95.38 CHECK 489749 TOTAL: 95.38 489750 11/03/2023 PRTD 999994 GO PERMITS LLC ED170570-REFUND 09/20/2019 20231102 64.44 CHECK 489750 TOTAL: 64.44 489751 11/03/2023 PRTD 999996 Hackner, Gayle 61744294-Refund 10/17/2023 20231102 10.00 CHECK 489751 TOTAL: 10.00 489752 11/03/2023 PRTD 999996 Newell, Dianna 61745303-Refund 10/17/2023 20231102 45.00 CHECK 489752 TOTAL: 45.00 489753 11/03/2023 PRTD 999996 Thatcher, Samantha 38710-Refund 10/13/2023 20231102 45.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489753 TOTAL: 45.00 489754 11/03/2023 PRTD 999997 GUTIERREZ, LISA 00079896-07/19/21 07/19/2021 20231102 50.82 CHECK 489754 TOTAL: 50.82 489755 11/03/2023 PRTD 999997 JENSEN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS INC 90212-1 10/10/2023 20231102 40.09 CHECK 489755 TOTAL: 40.09 489756 11/03/2023 PRTD 999997 JOHNSON, LYNETTE 00085052-11/08/2021 11/08/2021 20231102 36.35 CHECK 489756 TOTAL: 36.35 489757 11/03/2023 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 251865853 10/06/2023 20231102 55.71 ORKIN 251866789 10/10/2023 20231102 63.00 CHECK 489757 TOTAL: 118.71 489758 11/03/2023 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 216583 10/17/2023 20231102 2,278.50 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 216602 10/17/2023 20231102 100.00 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 216596 10/17/2023 20231102 454.70 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 216606 10/17/2023 20231102 942.20 CHECK 489758 TOTAL: 3,775.40 489759 11/03/2023 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 99385957 10/17/2023 20231102 733.70 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 17923155DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -343.75 CHECK 489759 TOTAL: 389.95 489760 11/03/2023 PRTD 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES INC ENG-21004 #3 10/06/2023 20231102 4,479.84 CHECK 489760 TOTAL: 4,479.84 489761 11/03/2023 PRTD 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 137020 10/01/2023 20231102 1,154.14 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 137891 10/01/2023 20231102 466.53 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489761 TOTAL: 1,620.67 489762 11/03/2023 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 161060 10/05/2023 20231102 324.80 SCHENCK, DAVID 161081 10/09/2023 20231102 792.40 SCHENCK, DAVID 161056 10/13/2023 20231102 1,849.76 CHECK 489762 TOTAL: 2,966.96 489763 11/03/2023 PRTD 160246 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 9732-10/23 10/09/2023 20231102 1,813.38 CHECK 489763 TOTAL: 1,813.38 489764 11/03/2023 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0080016-IN 10/05/2023 20231102 1,345.20 CHECK 489764 TOTAL: 1,345.20 489765 11/03/2023 PRTD 160037 RACHEL CONTRACTING, LLC ENG 21032 #15 10/09/2023 20231102 14,743.05 CHECK 489765 TOTAL: 14,743.05 489766 11/03/2023 PRTD 144351 REHDER, MARK 366 10/09/2023 20231102 1,233.40 CHECK 489766 TOTAL: 1,233.40 489767 11/03/2023 PRTD 114799 RES GREAT LAKES LLC IN41234 10/08/2023 20231102 1,478.33 RES GREAT LAKES LLC IN41235 10/08/2023 20231102 2,181.25 CHECK 489767 TOTAL: 3,659.58 489768 11/03/2023 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 796829 10/05/2023 20231102 118.51 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 796951 10/06/2023 20231102 354.00 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 796948 10/06/2023 20231102 45.10 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY CM790939 10/09/2023 20231102 -385.90 CHECK 489768 TOTAL: 131.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489769 11/03/2023 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC ENG-22016 #5 10/09/2023 20231102 87,404.76 CHECK 489769 TOTAL: 87,404.76 489770 11/03/2023 PRTD 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC 159806 10/10/2023 20231102 935.19 CHECK 489770 TOTAL: 935.19 489771 11/03/2023 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 454133 10/06/2023 20231102 18,904.44 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 454135 10/06/2023 20231102 8,802.15 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 454127 10/06/2023 20231102 579.29 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 454656 10/10/2023 20231102 43,546.96 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 454820 10/11/2023 20231102 3,019.09 CHECK 489771 TOTAL: 74,851.93 489772 11/03/2023 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18661 10/12/2023 20231102 213.39 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18676 10/06/2023 20231102 658.84 CHECK 489772 TOTAL: 872.23 489773 11/03/2023 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN70374 10/17/2023 20231102 221.00 SMALL LOT MN MN70375 10/17/2023 20231102 493.04 CHECK 489773 TOTAL: 714.04 489774 11/03/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402338 10/18/2023 20231102 1,013.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402337 10/18/2023 20231102 1,302.78 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402336 10/18/2023 20231102 147.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402339 10/18/2023 20231102 901.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402340 10/18/2023 20231102 41.29 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402341 10/18/2023 20231102 152.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402335 10/18/2023 20231102 2,741.53 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402333 10/18/2023 20231102 208.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402334 10/18/2023 20231102 632.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402332 10/18/2023 20231102 56.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402328 10/18/2023 20231102 270.71 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402329 10/18/2023 20231102 1,602.51 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402331 10/18/2023 20231102 400.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2402330 10/18/2023 20231102 3,703.12 CHECK 489774 TOTAL: 13,176.54 489775 11/03/2023 PRTD 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 16340.00-3 07/31/2023 22300016 20231102 9,969.35 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 16340.00-4 08/31/2023 22300016 20231102 12,455.85 CHECK 489775 TOTAL: 22,425.20 489776 11/03/2023 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 69859 10/16/2023 20231102 36,199.56 CHECK 489776 TOTAL: 36,199.56 489777 11/03/2023 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 2 LLC 70903 10/16/2023 20231102 8,198.72 CHECK 489777 TOTAL: 8,198.72 489778 11/03/2023 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 52255 10/18/2023 20231102 295.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 52269 10/18/2023 20231102 66.00 CHECK 489778 TOTAL: 361.00 489779 11/03/2023 PRTD 100991 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE INV189638 10/06/2023 20231102 1,514.51 CHECK 489779 TOTAL: 1,514.51 489780 11/03/2023 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447912198 10/12/2023 20231102 1,131.13 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447873129DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -660.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489780 TOTAL: 470.68 489781 11/03/2023 PRTD 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 5026995504 10/07/2023 20231102 12.45 CHECK 489781 TOTAL: 12.45 489782 11/03/2023 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 37649 10/18/2023 20231102 1,885.00 CHECK 489782 TOTAL: 1,885.00 489783 11/03/2023 PRTD 160648 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410001687 07/31/2023 20231102 35.34 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410015692 10/09/2023 20231102 40.76 CHECK 489783 TOTAL: 76.10 489784 11/03/2023 PRTD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC, LLC 150-0071625-01 10/10/2023 20231102 725.00 CHECK 489784 TOTAL: 725.00 489785 11/03/2023 PRTD 160066 UTILITYLOGIC 14293 10/09/2023 20231102 1,451.27 CHECK 489785 TOTAL: 1,451.27 489786 11/03/2023 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5120 10/18/2023 20231102 360.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5118 10/18/2023 20231102 480.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5119 10/18/2023 20231102 301.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5125 10/18/2023 20231102 360.00 CHECK 489786 TOTAL: 1,501.00 489787 11/03/2023 PRTD 141927 VER-TECH LABORATORIES INC INV722454 10/09/2023 20231102 200.00 CHECK 489787 TOTAL: 200.00 489788 11/03/2023 PRTD 145907 VERNON BP 10/9/23 10/10/2023 20231102 135.00 CHECK 489788 TOTAL: 135.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489789 11/03/2023 PRTD 148579 VIERKANT DISPOSAL LLC 10/10/2023 10/10/2023 20231102 68,070.00 CHECK 489789 TOTAL: 68,070.00 489790 11/03/2023 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007386241.001 10/05/2023 20231102 27.92 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007390789.001 10/05/2023 20231102 62.32 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007389608.001 10/05/2023 20231102 523.98 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007328873.002 10/10/2023 20231102 38.94 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007309274.001DUP 10/24/2023 20231102 -370.00 CHECK 489790 TOTAL: 283.16 489791 11/03/2023 PRTD 160875 VILLAGE GREEN LANDSCAPES INC 125259 10/06/2023 20231102 8,594.61 CHECK 489791 TOTAL: 8,594.61 489792 11/03/2023 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0338676-IN 10/19/2023 20231102 161.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0338677-IN 10/19/2023 20231102 113.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0338679-IN 10/19/2023 20231102 1,769.50 CHECK 489792 TOTAL: 2,044.00 489793 11/03/2023 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 69823993 10/13/2023 20231102 1,585.74 CHECK 489793 TOTAL: 1,585.74 489794 11/03/2023 PRTD 160878 WARCZAK, ANDREW 23CAPF-Warczak 10/12/2023 20231102 2,000.00 CHECK 489794 TOTAL: 2,000.00 489795 11/03/2023 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 0107028-2808-7 10/02/2023 20231102 6,671.32 CHECK 489795 TOTAL: 6,671.32 489796 11/03/2023 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 249254 10/18/2023 20231102 3,492.00 WINE COMPANY 249255 10/18/2023 20231102 1,130.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE COMPANY 249256 10/18/2023 20231102 2,092.20 CHECK 489796 TOTAL: 6,714.20 489797 11/03/2023 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00137886 10/17/2023 20231102 1,017.00 WINEBOW MN00137936 10/18/2023 20231102 144.00 WINEBOW MN00126390 10/19/2023 20231102 -3.00 CHECK 489797 TOTAL: 1,158.00 489798 11/03/2023 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4659 10/19/2023 20231102 179.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4657 10/19/2023 20231102 293.10 CHECK 489798 TOTAL: 472.20 489799 11/03/2023 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-002061 10/17/2023 20231102 916.00 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-002050 10/16/2023 20231102 144.04 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-002060 10/17/2023 20231102 120.04 CHECK 489799 TOTAL: 1,180.08 489800 11/03/2023 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-022715-000-3 07/31/2023 22300017 20231102 2,636.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-022715-000 - 4 08/31/2023 22300017 20231102 15,330.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-017897-000 - 28 10/05/2023 20231102 53,994.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018471-000 - 22 10/05/2023 20231102 6,943.50 CHECK 489800 TOTAL: 78,904.75 489801 11/03/2023 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN001195020 10/06/2023 20231102 279.01 CHECK 489801 TOTAL: 279.01 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/02/2023 13:24User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 NUMBER OF CHECKS 159 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 2,040,180.11 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 157 1,527,012.76 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS 2 513,167.35 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 2,040,180.11 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/03/2023 08:59User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 5900 Utility Fund 115,275.679999 Pooled Cash Fund 115,275.67 TOTAL 115,275.67 115,275.67 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Mallory Schauer ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/03/2023 08:59User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489802 11/03/2023 PRTD 132620 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRIC 2023-09-01RJA 09/05/2023 20231103 115,275.67 CHECK 489802 TOTAL: 115,275.67 NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 115,275.67 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 1 115,275.67 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 115,275.67 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 204,340.562100 Police Special Revenue 549.732300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 100,912.002500 Conservation & Sustainability 442.252600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 196.752600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 172.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 7,494.394000 Capital Projects 47,397.744400 PIR Capital Projects 127,618.264600 MSA tracking 522,221.355100 Art Center 235.795200 Braemar Golf Course 27,663.845200 Braemar Golf Course 8,311.505400 Edinborough Park 929.825500 Braemar Arena 18,269.625600 Braemar Field 1,712.145700 Centennial Lakes 1,334.925800 Liquor 48,509.875900 Utility Fund 50,704.785900 Utility Fund 19,425.475900 Utility Fund 98,342.196100 Equipment Operations 18,684.676200 Information Technology 6,149.976300 Facilities Management 6,420.227100 PS Training Facility 586.699999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,318,626.52 TOTAL 1,318,626.52 1,318,626.52 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Mallory Schauer ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489803 11/10/2023 PRTD 129109 ACOUSTICAL SURFACES INC 2343-1 10/10/2023 20231110 980.00 CHECK 489803 TOTAL: 980.00 489804 11/10/2023 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916721104 10/17/2023 20231110 240.75 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916721419 10/18/2023 20231110 126.52 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916746282 10/24/2023 20231110 288.42 CHECK 489804 TOTAL: 655.69 489805 11/10/2023 PRTD 160287 AMAZING ATHLETES OF CENTRAL MN 458565 07/20/2023 20231110 2,210.00 CHECK 489805 TOTAL: 2,210.00 489806 11/10/2023 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16TD-GDPP-7RRC 09/20/2023 20231110 545.76 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NV4-JKDR-7WPC 10/10/2023 20231110 155.47 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V73-PNH7-HD1P 10/10/2023 20231110 110.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VXQ-NGK3-HLHN 10/11/2023 20231110 339.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KY4-KMFQ-PFD7 10/11/2023 20231110 32.38 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TNG-WX49-PHWW 10/11/2023 20231110 28.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1K6V-9H7M-QGRD 10/11/2023 20231110 57.64 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JYM-D7FK-VRR4 10/11/2023 20231110 17.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TMP-3XLG-W9CF 10/11/2023 20231110 129.07 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1F96-6HM1-33MX 10/12/2023 20231110 39.92 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KRL-TWWG-1GLC 10/12/2023 20231110 34.78 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TQF-TG69-C6JH 10/12/2023 20231110 29.05 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HM6-FH7X-FGRF 10/12/2023 20231110 13.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1K9M-V696-FPW1 10/12/2023 20231110 6.28 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1661-6NTF-FLC4 10/12/2023 20231110 11.79 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 113Q-MFGY-GCVC 10/12/2023 20231110 26.78 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WJ7-D13C-G3KD 10/12/2023 20231110 114.78 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16PG-NYPL-LKJH 10/13/2023 20231110 36.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1133-V41X-PY7K 10/13/2023 20231110 219.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CVY-PVJL-VWRD 10/14/2023 20231110 7.49 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YMM-491M-XNLP 10/15/2023 20231110 15.42 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FHX-DQFD-YQKY 10/15/2023 20231110 28.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1M9V-TYVG-YQPJ 10/15/2023 20231110 10.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1X6X-TPXR-1HC4 10/15/2023 20231110 3.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19TJ-CCFC-X7W9 10/15/2023 20231110 13.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 113Q-MFGY-YNWM 10/15/2023 20231110 35.46 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XX4-F9QC-6KMM 10/15/2023 20231110 64.29 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HVW-NFNN-3VGT 10/15/2023 20231110 20.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17CV-VTGV-4D1Y 10/15/2023 20231110 99.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DYN-KMNF-331R 10/16/2023 20231110 93.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T7F-KXCD-113Q 10/16/2023 20231110 118.82 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1X49-LMQF-4PFQ 10/17/2023 20231110 137.35 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T7F-KXCD-4TKT 10/17/2023 20231110 46.53 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17KP-G7P9-64JG 10/17/2023 20231110 2.25 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FC4-7K7W-1K6D 10/17/2023 20231110 277.38 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FC4-7K7W-46YT 10/17/2023 20231110 171.53 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RYV-4RF4-1D77 10/17/2023 20231110 112.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RX4-7M1M-1NDM 10/17/2023 20231110 8.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1461-PTJW-1K19 10/17/2023 20231110 153.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HKK-MTCM-3LTQ 10/17/2023 20231110 25.05 CHECK 489806 TOTAL: 3,401.64 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489807 11/10/2023 PRTD 160543 AMES, ANTHONY 10132023 10/13/2023 20231110 980.00 CHECK 489807 TOTAL: 980.00 489808 11/10/2023 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500307155 08/30/2023 20231110 365.57 CHECK 489808 TOTAL: 365.57 489809 11/10/2023 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 321258 10/13/2023 20231110 106.98 CHECK 489809 TOTAL: 106.98 489810 11/10/2023 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271917.23-9 10/13/2023 20231110 5,305.62 CHECK 489810 TOTAL: 5,305.62 489811 11/10/2023 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 3310 10/20/2023 20231110 210.00 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 3307 10/16/2023 20231110 70.00 CHECK 489811 TOTAL: 280.00 489812 11/10/2023 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0201326100 10/26/2023 20231110 2,534.59 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107535000 10/26/2023 20231110 130.29 CHECK 489812 TOTAL: 2,664.88 489813 11/10/2023 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 24737 10/26/2023 20231110 162.00 CHECK 489813 TOTAL: 162.00 489814 11/10/2023 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 201407 10/24/2023 20231110 260.00 CHECK 489814 TOTAL: 260.00 489815 11/10/2023 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 095S1117 10/12/2023 20231110 13,879.34 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P2451 10/13/2023 20231110 1,171.16 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1854 10/16/2023 20231110 63.28 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1103DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -178.32 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1106DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -72.26 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1133DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -29.88 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1137DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -29.88 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1182DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -60.31 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P1907DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 36.78 CHECK 489815 TOTAL: 14,779.91 489816 11/10/2023 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B361282 10/10/2023 20231110 640.25 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B361391 10/11/2023 20231110 1,294.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362085 10/16/2023 20231110 4,375.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362090 10/16/2023 20231110 4,453.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362091 10/16/2023 20231110 1,058.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362100 10/16/2023 20231110 2,017.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362099 10/16/2023 20231110 424.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362098 10/16/2023 20231110 532.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362107 10/16/2023 20231110 912.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362103 10/16/2023 20231110 6,987.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B362121 10/17/2023 20231110 20,568.00 CHECK 489816 TOTAL: 43,263.25 489817 11/10/2023 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112626879 10/18/2023 20231110 2,414.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112729724 10/25/2023 20231110 235.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112729727 10/25/2023 20231110 104.33 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112729725 10/25/2023 20231110 1,217.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 112729726 10/25/2023 20231110 1,508.65 CHECK 489817 TOTAL: 5,480.33 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489818 11/10/2023 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112710142 10/24/2023 20231110 180.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112710143 10/24/2023 20231110 253.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112703699 10/24/2023 20231110 2,390.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112710140 10/24/2023 20231110 300.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 112710141 10/24/2023 20231110 87.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411588161 10/21/2023 20231110 -12.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411588160 10/21/2023 20231110 -13.10 CHECK 489818 TOTAL: 3,186.10 489819 11/10/2023 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1265274-1 10/13/2023 20231110 73.56 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1265821-1 10/17/2023 20231110 177.50 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1265094-1 10/12/2023 20231110 84.52 CHECK 489819 TOTAL: 335.58 489820 11/10/2023 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 937099193 09/22/2023 20231110 297.00 CHECK 489820 TOTAL: 297.00 489821 11/10/2023 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2903454 10/20/2023 20231110 61.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2906000 10/27/2023 20231110 104.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2906001 10/27/2023 20231110 843.10 CHECK 489821 TOTAL: 1,008.60 489822 11/10/2023 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 7282908 09/28/2023 20231110 1,433.50 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 7283293 09/29/2023 20231110 1,279.50 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 7291283 10/05/2023 20231110 1,085.50 CHECK 489822 TOTAL: 3,798.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489823 11/10/2023 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 23374 10/15/2023 20231110 172.00 CHECK 489823 TOTAL: 172.00 489824 11/10/2023 PRTD 160160 CHRISTIANSON'S BUSINESS FURNITURE 87465 10/13/2023 20231110 1,618.48 CHRISTIANSON'S BUSINESS FURNITURE 87556 10/17/2023 20231110 295.00 CHECK 489824 TOTAL: 1,913.48 489825 11/10/2023 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4170567593 10/12/2023 20231110 14.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4170567556 10/12/2023 20231110 6.00 CINTAS CORPORATION 4170567557 10/12/2023 20231110 13.68 CINTAS CORPORATION 4170890423 10/16/2023 20231110 78.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4170890414 10/16/2023 20231110 181.49 CHECK 489825 TOTAL: 293.82 489826 11/10/2023 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 714690 10/19/2023 20231110 178.45 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 715353 10/24/2023 20231110 166.50 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 715352 10/24/2023 20231110 34.25 CHECK 489826 TOTAL: 379.20 489827 11/10/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0373022-10/23 10/17/2023 20231110 34.98 CHECK 489827 TOTAL: 34.98 489828 11/10/2023 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0740105-10/23 10/17/2023 20231110 87.30 CHECK 489828 TOTAL: 87.30 489829 11/10/2023 PRTD 104928 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 36676 10/12/2023 20231110 235.00 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 36726 10/16/2023 20231110 -162.00 CHECK 489829 TOTAL: 73.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489830 11/10/2023 PRTD 143187 CONQUER ATHLETICS LLC 0019 09/06/2023 20231110 140.00 CONQUER ATHLETICS LLC 0020 09/06/2023 20231110 700.00 CHECK 489830 TOTAL: 840.00 489831 11/10/2023 PRTD 143187 CONQUER NINJA GYMS 0018 09/06/2023 20231110 280.00 CONQUER NINJA GYMS 0015 09/10/2023 20231110 248.00 CONQUER NINJA GYMS 0016 09/08/2023 20231110 296.00 CONQUER NINJA GYMS 0017 09/08/2023 20231110 148.00 CHECK 489831 TOTAL: 972.00 489832 11/10/2023 PRTD 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 0236855-IN 10/16/2023 20231110 86.86 CHECK 489832 TOTAL: 86.86 489833 11/10/2023 PRTD 102514 CUTTER & BUCK INC 0097148106 10/11/2023 20231110 757.96 CHECK 489833 TOTAL: 757.96 489834 11/10/2023 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4147401 10/17/2023 20231110 329.89 CHECK 489834 TOTAL: 329.89 489835 11/10/2023 PRTD 160780 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-1493 10/19/2023 20231110 136.00 CHECK 489835 TOTAL: 136.00 489836 11/10/2023 PRTD 143088 DARTS SI0008234 09/30/2023 20231110 330.00 CHECK 489836 TOTAL: 330.00 489837 11/10/2023 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 045419181X230919 09/19/2023 20231110 142.56 CHECK 489837 TOTAL: 142.56 489838 11/10/2023 PRTD 129079 DRAIN KING INC 119991 10/13/2023 20231110 907.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489838 TOTAL: 907.50 489839 11/10/2023 PRTD 160551 DUKE AERIAL INC 523459-0001 10/12/2023 20231110 871.50 CHECK 489839 TOTAL: 871.50 489840 11/10/2023 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 967437 10/05/2023 20231110 189.00 CHECK 489840 TOTAL: 189.00 489841 11/10/2023 PRTD 142458 EDINA MARKET STREET LLC Q3-2023-GARAGEDOOR 10/17/2023 20231110 2,522.00 CHECK 489841 TOTAL: 2,522.00 489842 11/10/2023 PRTD 103594 EDINALARM INC 97321 10/16/2023 20231110 232.09 CHECK 489842 TOTAL: 232.09 489843 11/10/2023 PRTD 160884 ESCH CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC INV54146 10/13/2023 20231110 96.58 CHECK 489843 TOTAL: 96.58 489844 11/10/2023 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-12004 10/19/2023 20231110 201.00 CHECK 489844 TOTAL: 201.00 489845 11/10/2023 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0519175-3 10/11/2023 20231110 452.64 CHECK 489845 TOTAL: 452.64 489846 11/10/2023 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 009855 10/10/2023 20231110 1,251.50 CHECK 489846 TOTAL: 1,251.50 489847 11/10/2023 PRTD 160892 FORE CARDS LLC 6B480C9A-0001 08/08/2023 20231110 1,252.86 CHECK 489847 TOTAL: 1,252.86 489848 11/10/2023 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1972952 10/10/2023 20231110 167.11 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1973567 10/10/2023 20231110 214.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1974562 10/12/2023 20231110 223.68 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1974585 10/12/2023 20231110 1,139.40 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1975175 10/12/2023 20231110 53.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1977742 10/17/2023 20231110 31.49 CHECK 489848 TOTAL: 1,829.06 489849 11/10/2023 PRTD 160889 GOCHARGE LLC 38648082 10/02/2023 20231110 3,295.00 CHECK 489849 TOTAL: 3,295.00 489850 11/10/2023 PRTD 160739 GOTLER, FALEN SS-303-08-3341 11/03/2023 20231110 500.00 CHECK 489850 TOTAL: 500.00 489851 11/10/2023 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9866871628 10/11/2023 20231110 22.34 WW GRAINGER 9869019761 10/12/2023 20231110 6.79 WW GRAINGER 9687183054 04/26/2023 20231110 204.56 WW GRAINGER 9687183062 04/26/2023 20231110 25.94 WW GRAINGER 9687183070 04/26/2023 20231110 166.50 CHECK 489851 TOTAL: 426.13 489852 11/10/2023 PRTD 160108 GREAT RIVER OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 030956-00 10/16/2023 20231110 110.19 CHECK 489852 TOTAL: 110.19 489853 11/10/2023 PRTD 160347 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY LLC 23-0306 04/13/2023 20231110 400.00 CHECK 489853 TOTAL: 400.00 489854 11/10/2023 PRTD 138300 H2OVERHAUL INC 2439 10/16/2023 20231110 5,400.00 CHECK 489854 TOTAL: 5,400.00 489855 11/10/2023 PRTD 100790 HACH COMPANY 13771947 10/10/2023 20231110 302.00 HACH COMPANY 13778255 10/13/2023 20231110 125.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489855 TOTAL: 427.00 489856 11/10/2023 PRTD 130116 HARRIS SR000041483 10/16/2023 20231110 2,600.00 CHECK 489856 TOTAL: 2,600.00 489857 11/10/2023 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0377501 10/02/2023 20231110 6,500.00 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0381001 10/09/2023 20231110 6,500.00 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0381401 10/10/2023 20231110 18,000.00 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0386301 10/16/2023 20231110 -13,090.90 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0368801DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -7,850.00 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0369401DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -6,500.00 CHECK 489857 TOTAL: 3,559.10 489858 11/10/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000212840 09/29/2023 20231110 15,000.00 CHECK 489858 TOTAL: 15,000.00 489859 11/10/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000213023 10/04/2023 20231110 2,429.10 CHECK 489859 TOTAL: 2,429.10 489860 11/10/2023 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000214113 10/23/2023 20231110 1,004.00 CHECK 489860 TOTAL: 1,004.00 489861 11/10/2023 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 244193 10/17/2023 20231110 8,324.89 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 244194 10/17/2023 20231110 1,860.72 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 244195 10/17/2023 20231110 2,845.53 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 244270 10/17/2023 20231110 533.46 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 244276 10/17/2023 20231110 548.81 CHECK 489861 TOTAL: 14,113.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489862 11/10/2023 PRTD 160535 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY GROUP I 0013044755-001 10/12/2023 20231110 7,599.06 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY GROUP I 0013044919-001 10/12/2023 20231110 2,255.05 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY GROUP I 0013044860-001 10/12/2023 20231110 3,887.85 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY GROUP I 0013044669-001 10/12/2023 20231110 7,477.60 CHECK 489862 TOTAL: 21,219.56 489863 11/10/2023 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 657885 10/24/2023 20231110 135.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 657884 10/24/2023 20231110 663.90 HOHENSTEINS INC 657919 10/24/2023 20231110 633.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 657918 10/24/2023 20231110 120.00 CHECK 489863 TOTAL: 1,551.90 489864 11/10/2023 PRTD 160569 MIDWEST WASH SYSTEMS ED10306 10/17/2023 20231110 318.96 CHECK 489864 TOTAL: 318.96 489865 11/10/2023 PRTD 116680 HP INC 9017860352 10/06/2023 20231110 3,411.42 CHECK 489865 TOTAL: 3,411.42 489866 11/10/2023 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 17184 10/25/2023 20231110 126.00 CHECK 489866 TOTAL: 126.00 489867 11/10/2023 PRTD 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV410573 08/02/2023 20231110 12.55 CHECK 489867 TOTAL: 12.55 489868 11/10/2023 PRTD 160653 INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 8486 10/20/2023 20231110 110.74 CHECK 489868 TOTAL: 110.74 489869 11/10/2023 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3635876 10/19/2023 20231110 615.65 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 375644 10/20/2023 20231110 -8.46 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3637406 10/26/2023 20231110 1,319.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3637405 10/26/2023 20231110 101.40 CHECK 489869 TOTAL: 2,028.39 489870 11/10/2023 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677081 10/19/2023 20231110 487.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6677082 10/19/2023 20231110 1,391.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6680589 10/26/2023 20231110 930.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6680590 10/26/2023 20231110 140.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6680591 10/26/2023 20231110 363.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6680588 10/26/2023 20231110 88.90 CHECK 489870 TOTAL: 3,402.30 489871 11/10/2023 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7447271 10/19/2023 20231110 935.00 WINE MERCHANTS 7448101 10/26/2023 20231110 1,826.60 CHECK 489871 TOTAL: 2,761.60 489872 11/10/2023 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406990 10/19/2023 20231110 449.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2406995 10/19/2023 20231110 599.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407004 10/19/2023 20231110 341.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2407005 10/19/2023 20231110 97.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2411563 10/26/2023 20231110 55.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2411547 10/26/2023 20231110 828.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2411550 10/26/2023 20231110 324.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2411555 10/26/2023 20231110 181.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2411561 10/26/2023 20231110 2,049.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2411562 10/26/2023 20231110 284.20 CHECK 489872 TOTAL: 5,211.77 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489873 11/10/2023 PRTD 145396 JUNKYARD BREWING COMPANY LLC 006138 10/24/2023 20231110 160.00 CHECK 489873 TOTAL: 160.00 489874 11/10/2023 PRTD 160888 KERN LAWN SERVICE INC 84143 09/26/2023 20231110 1,173.00 CHECK 489874 TOTAL: 1,173.00 489875 11/10/2023 PRTD 160105 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. W21542 10/12/2023 20231110 5,223.44 CHECK 489875 TOTAL: 5,223.44 489876 11/10/2023 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 26261125 09/30/2023 20231110 6,082.49 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 26089657 09/30/2023 20231110 1,982.17 CHECK 489876 TOTAL: 8,064.66 489877 11/10/2023 PRTD 160327 OUTDOOR WATER SOLUTIONS LLC 4811 10/16/2023 20231110 20,670.00 CHECK 489877 TOTAL: 20,670.00 489878 11/10/2023 PRTD 151166 LAMIS, JAMES 23020116 10/16/2023 20231110 2,537.50 CHECK 489878 TOTAL: 2,537.50 489879 11/10/2023 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 01-1030956 10/12/2023 20231110 715.56 CHECK 489879 TOTAL: 715.56 489880 11/10/2023 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9310997052 10/13/2023 20231110 751.43 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9311001413 10/16/2023 20231110 48.37 CHECK 489880 TOTAL: 799.80 489881 11/10/2023 PRTD 103217 LHB INC 220556.00-13 10/16/2023 20231110 442.25 CHECK 489881 TOTAL: 442.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489882 11/10/2023 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 63911 10/24/2023 20231110 110.00 CHECK 489882 TOTAL: 110.00 489883 11/10/2023 PRTD 160624 LITTLE THISTLE BREWING COMPANY 2279 10/24/2023 20231110 186.00 CHECK 489883 TOTAL: 186.00 489884 11/10/2023 PRTD 160548 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-1858 10/19/2023 20231110 25.17 CHECK 489884 TOTAL: 25.17 489885 11/10/2023 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 56529 10/17/2023 20231110 147.50 CHECK 489885 TOTAL: 147.50 489886 11/10/2023 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 124598 09/30/2023 20231110 320.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 124656 09/30/2023 20231110 737.60 LVC COMPANIES INC 124662 09/30/2023 20231110 891.96 LVC COMPANIES INC 125021 10/10/2023 20231110 440.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 125023 10/10/2023 20231110 440.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 125024 10/10/2023 20231110 440.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 125379 10/13/2023 20231110 672.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 124769 09/30/2023 20231110 1,022.00 LVC COMPANIES INC 125379-Materials 10/13/2023 20231110 221.98 CHECK 489886 TOTAL: 5,185.54 489887 11/10/2023 PRTD 116410 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40673431 10/10/2023 20231110 17,349.24 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40687987 10/11/2023 20231110 27,649.84 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40706503 10/12/2023 20231110 12,621.18 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40720882 10/13/2023 20231110 7,244.44 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 40753041 10/17/2023 20231110 190.01 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489887 TOTAL: 65,054.71 489888 11/10/2023 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1095308 10/25/2023 20231110 990.00 MAVERICK WINE LLC CM111268 10/11/2023 20231110 -8.67 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1095310/1095312 10/25/2023 20231110 1,926.18 CHECK 489888 TOTAL: 2,907.51 489889 11/10/2023 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 89975 09/29/2023 20231110 68.99 MENARDS 91100 10/17/2023 20231110 28.94 MENARDS 90683 10/10/2023 20231110 45.14 MENARDS 90598 10/09/2023 20231110 198.12 CHECK 489889 TOTAL: 341.19 489890 11/10/2023 PRTD 100885 METRO SALES INC INV2381675 10/10/2023 20231110 224.67 CHECK 489890 TOTAL: 224.67 489891 11/10/2023 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 532680 10/11/2023 20231110 16.90 CHECK 489891 TOTAL: 16.90 489892 11/10/2023 PRTD 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING COMPANY LLC 12200 10/16/2023 20231110 8,991.71 MINNESOTA SODDING COMPANY LLC 12201 10/16/2023 20231110 9,574.19 CHECK 489892 TOTAL: 18,565.90 489893 11/10/2023 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35351 10/12/2023 20231110 51.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35344 10/12/2023 20231110 27.00 CHECK 489893 TOTAL: 78.00 489894 11/10/2023 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45532 10/24/2023 20231110 120.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-45531 10/24/2023 20231110 213.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489894 TOTAL: 333.50 489895 11/10/2023 PRTD 126981 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC INV74984 10/13/2023 20231110 3,785.00 CHECK 489895 TOTAL: 3,785.00 489896 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10654 02/03/2023 20231110 400.00 CHECK 489896 TOTAL: 400.00 489897 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10607 01/01/2023 20231110 250.00 CHECK 489897 TOTAL: 250.00 489898 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10577 01/01/2023 20231110 125.00 CHECK 489898 TOTAL: 125.00 489899 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10522 01/01/2023 20231110 125.00 CHECK 489899 TOTAL: 125.00 489900 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10667 02/19/2023 20231110 50.00 CHECK 489900 TOTAL: 50.00 489901 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10686 03/31/2023 20231110 250.00 CHECK 489901 TOTAL: 250.00 489902 11/10/2023 PRTD 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASS 10733 05/05/2023 20231110 50.00 CHECK 489902 TOTAL: 50.00 489903 11/10/2023 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1409230-00 10/13/2023 20231110 23.62 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1409343-00 10/16/2023 20231110 43.71 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1409597-00 10/18/2023 20231110 215.70 CHECK 489903 TOTAL: 283.03 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489904 11/10/2023 PRTD 160393 NEO ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 5850 10/12/2023 20231110 6,199.89 CHECK 489904 TOTAL: 6,199.89 489905 11/10/2023 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 213082 10/25/2023 20231110 514.00 CHECK 489905 TOTAL: 514.00 489906 11/10/2023 PRTD 104350 NIKE USA INC 9783912015 10/13/2023 20231110 49.65 CHECK 489906 TOTAL: 49.65 489907 11/10/2023 PRTD 139023 NUSS TRUCK GROUP INC PSO038617-1DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -475.28 NUSS TRUCK GROUP INC PSO049782-1 10/20/2023 20231110 1,357.64 CHECK 489907 TOTAL: 882.36 489908 11/10/2023 PRTD 160033 OLD WORLD BEER LLC 3173 10/19/2023 20231110 108.84 OLD WORLD BEER LLC 3183 10/24/2023 20231110 150.94 CHECK 489908 TOTAL: 259.78 489909 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED191564-Refund 10/23/2023 20231110 9,450.00 CHECK 489909 TOTAL: 9,450.00 489910 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 Hendel Construction LLC ED192013-Refund 10/16/2023 20231110 9,560.00 CHECK 489910 TOTAL: 9,560.00 489911 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 KOTHRADE SEWER, WATER & EXCAVATIN ED209553-REFUND 10/26/2023 20231110 74.95 CHECK 489911 TOTAL: 74.95 489912 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 MISSION CONSTRUCTION ED188542-Refund 10/16/2023 20231110 9,120.00 CHECK 489912 TOTAL: 9,120.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489913 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 Precision Heating & Cooling ED197747-Refund 10/10/2023 20231110 89.76 CHECK 489913 TOTAL: 89.76 489914 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICE ED180465-Refund 10/23/2023 20231110 8,900.00 CHECK 489914 TOTAL: 8,900.00 489915 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 Ridge Construction LLC ED199022-Refund 10/23/2023 20231110 10,000.00 CHECK 489915 TOTAL: 10,000.00 489916 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 The Window Store Inc ED208750-Refund 10/17/2023 20231110 188.60 CHECK 489916 TOTAL: 188.60 489917 11/10/2023 PRTD 999995 TRUE CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION, INC ED209122-Refund 10/17/2023 20231110 2,125.15 CHECK 489917 TOTAL: 2,125.15 489918 11/10/2023 PRTD 999994 Flynn, Mary Parking #176-Refund 10/30/2023 20231110 21.50 CHECK 489918 TOTAL: 21.50 489919 11/10/2023 PRTD 999994 Lasting Moments Photograph 2808 10/17/2023 20231110 75.00 CHECK 489919 TOTAL: 75.00 489920 11/10/2023 PRTD 999994 Mccarthy, Julie 10/25/23-Refund 10/25/2023 20231110 360.00 CHECK 489920 TOTAL: 360.00 489921 11/10/2023 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 251866450 10/16/2023 20231110 149.47 ORKIN 251866083 10/16/2023 20231110 141.00 ORKIN 251866311 10/17/2023 20231110 26.28 ORKIN 251866827 10/17/2023 20231110 30.00 CHECK 489921 TOTAL: 346.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489922 11/10/2023 PRTD 129485 PAPCO INC 229234-2 07/25/2023 20231110 62.48 PAPCO INC 229985 09/08/2023 20231110 431.02 PAPCO INC 230282 10/09/2023 20231110 71.48 PAPCO INC OP489282 07/25/2023 20231110 -85.73 CHECK 489922 TOTAL: 479.25 489923 11/10/2023 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 217357 10/24/2023 20231110 755.50 CHECK 489923 TOTAL: 755.50 489924 11/10/2023 PRTD 151606 PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY STANDARDS INC INV-8348 10/10/2023 20231110 4,985.00 CHECK 489924 TOTAL: 4,985.00 489925 11/10/2023 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-207281 10/12/2023 20231110 222.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-207287 10/12/2023 20231110 351.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-206386 10/12/2023 20231110 83.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING 489285 10/23/2023 20231110 -1,405.64 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-207969 10/19/2023 20231110 154.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-208031 10/19/2023 20231110 256.70 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-208151 10/19/2023 20231110 353.00 CHECK 489925 TOTAL: 15.56 489926 11/10/2023 PRTD 160261 PETERSON, RACHAEL Oct 2023 10/28/2023 20231110 480.00 CHECK 489926 TOTAL: 480.00 489927 11/10/2023 PRTD 160501 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 13929208 10/16/2023 20231110 3,230.37 CHECK 489927 TOTAL: 3,230.37 489928 11/10/2023 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 8273963 10/12/2023 20231110 107.44 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 489928 TOTAL: 107.44 489929 11/10/2023 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210678534 10/13/2023 20231110 341.95 CHECK 489929 TOTAL: 341.95 489930 11/10/2023 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 111713 10/13/2023 20231110 1,606.45 CHECK 489930 TOTAL: 1,606.45 489931 11/10/2023 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-63436 10/19/2023 20231110 552.00 CHECK 489931 TOTAL: 552.00 489932 11/10/2023 PRTD 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE 1003239 10/14/2023 20231110 391.93 CHECK 489932 TOTAL: 391.93 489933 11/10/2023 PRTD 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC 45728 10/11/2023 20231110 2,670.00 CHECK 489933 TOTAL: 2,670.00 489934 11/10/2023 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0080110-IN 10/13/2023 20231110 55.70 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0080150-IN 10/13/2023 20231110 132.00 CHECK 489934 TOTAL: 187.70 489935 11/10/2023 PRTD 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC 128857 10/13/2023 20231110 8,311.50 CHECK 489935 TOTAL: 8,311.50 489936 11/10/2023 PRTD 100975 MULTI SERVICE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION 7392010 10/13/2023 20231110 1,059.98 CHECK 489936 TOTAL: 1,059.98 489937 11/10/2023 PRTD 125936 REINDERS INC 3099663-00 10/13/2023 20231110 873.26 CHECK 489937 TOTAL: 873.26 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489938 11/10/2023 PRTD 114799 RES GREAT LAKES LLC IN41237 10/08/2023 20231110 1,435.73 CHECK 489938 TOTAL: 1,435.73 489939 11/10/2023 PRTD 160819 RLC LANDSCAPE DESIGN LLC 1288 10/11/2023 20231110 500.00 CHECK 489939 TOTAL: 500.00 489940 11/10/2023 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC ENG 22-2 #11 10/13/2023 20231110 857,034.33 CHECK 489940 TOTAL: 857,034.33 489941 11/10/2023 PRTD 160255 SACHS, FRANK D 000159 10/13/2023 20231110 455.00 CHECK 489941 TOTAL: 455.00 489942 11/10/2023 PRTD 160879 SALISBURY, TAI October 10, 2023 10/10/2023 20231110 171.50 CHECK 489942 TOTAL: 171.50 489943 11/10/2023 PRTD 160607 SCHILLING, ANNEMARIE Conference Refund 10/25/2023 20231110 459.86 CHECK 489943 TOTAL: 459.86 489944 11/10/2023 PRTD 144403 SENTEXT SOLUTIONS 338599 10/20/2023 20231110 318.50 CHECK 489944 TOTAL: 318.50 489945 11/10/2023 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2954422 10/26/2023 20231110 24.32 CHECK 489945 TOTAL: 24.32 489946 11/10/2023 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0009048 09/29/2023 20231110 35.46 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0009640 10/04/2023 20231110 32.72 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0010230 10/13/2023 20231110 35.46 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0002644 06/28/2023 20231110 32.72 CHECK 489946 TOTAL: 136.36 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489947 11/10/2023 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18616 09/05/2023 20231110 1,027.01 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18705 10/04/2023 20231110 1,042.50 CHECK 489947 TOTAL: 2,069.51 489948 11/10/2023 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 130513164-001. 05/26/2023 20231110 83.60 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134469639-001DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -112.78 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 134659195-001DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -107.50 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 135660379-001 10/18/2023 20231110 349.58 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 135661918-001 10/18/2023 20231110 40.13 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 135670610-001 10/18/2023 20231110 5.24 CHECK 489948 TOTAL: 258.27 489949 11/10/2023 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/59061129 10/11/2023 20231110 172.73 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARS/16664663 10/12/2023 20231110 145.00 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/59105023 10/16/2023 20231110 98.39 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/58717332DUP 10/24/2023 20231110 -15.39 CHECK 489949 TOTAL: 400.73 489950 11/10/2023 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 125828012 09/18/2023 20231110 146.76 CHECK 489950 TOTAL: 146.76 489951 11/10/2023 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2404780 10/25/2023 20231110 1,208.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2404781 10/25/2023 20231110 3,461.91 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2404779 10/25/2023 20231110 181.56 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2404782 10/25/2023 20231110 238.00 CHECK 489951 TOTAL: 5,090.07 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489952 11/10/2023 PRTD 139006 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY ALR0152122X 10/12/2023 20231110 100.00 CHECK 489952 TOTAL: 100.00 489953 11/10/2023 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 52321 10/24/2023 20231110 124.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 52341 10/24/2023 20231110 571.00 CHECK 489953 TOTAL: 695.00 489954 11/10/2023 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 202405P 10/11/2023 20231110 130.69 CHECK 489954 TOTAL: 130.69 489955 11/10/2023 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10196907 10/10/2023 20231110 147.21 CHECK 489955 TOTAL: 147.21 489956 11/10/2023 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447921560 10/18/2023 20231110 461.93 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447923433 10/19/2023 20231110 37.85 CHECK 489956 TOTAL: 499.78 489957 11/10/2023 PRTD 137993 TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC 0017638 09/20/2023 20231110 434.95 CHECK 489957 TOTAL: 434.95 489958 11/10/2023 PRTD 160414 TEGRA GROUP INC 424.1023 10/02/2023 20231110 6,000.00 CHECK 489958 TOTAL: 6,000.00 489959 11/10/2023 PRTD 129923 CONTEMPORARY INC V969030 09/22/2023 20231110 28.76 CHECK 489959 TOTAL: 28.76 489960 11/10/2023 PRTD 160677 THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING COE-008 09/30/2023 20231110 2,937.50 CHECK 489960 TOTAL: 2,937.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489961 11/10/2023 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M28578 09/28/2023 20231110 1,043.25 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M28620 10/12/2023 20231110 1,118.75 CHECK 489961 TOTAL: 2,162.00 489962 11/10/2023 PRTD 119374 TNC INDUSTRIES INC 35772 01/01/2023 20231110 1,367.00 CHECK 489962 TOTAL: 1,367.00 489963 11/10/2023 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 10535289 10/14/2023 20231110 40.75 CHECK 489963 TOTAL: 40.75 489964 11/10/2023 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2223195 10/13/2023 20231110 1,350.00 CHECK 489964 TOTAL: 1,350.00 489965 11/10/2023 PRTD 160648 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410778099 07/17/2023 20231110 17.45 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410751653 02/27/2023 20231110 14.38 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410763660 05/01/2023 20231110 17.58 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410772814 06/19/2023 20231110 14.52 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410016993 10/16/2023 20231110 40.76 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410016994 10/16/2023 20231110 24.23 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1630299093 07/13/2023 20231110 1,327.36 CHECK 489965 TOTAL: 1,456.28 489966 11/10/2023 PRTD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC, LLC 150-0071746-01 10/10/2023 20231110 14.00 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC, LLC 150-0070894-02 10/11/2023 20231110 7.00 CHECK 489966 TOTAL: 21.00 489967 11/10/2023 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-3012 10/20/2023 20231110 266.00 CHECK 489967 TOTAL: 266.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489968 11/10/2023 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 71739 10/16/2023 20231110 4,540.48 CHECK 489968 TOTAL: 4,540.48 489969 11/10/2023 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 051591 10/16/2023 20231110 85.93 CHECK 489969 TOTAL: 85.93 489970 11/10/2023 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5161 10/25/2023 20231110 170.00 CHECK 489970 TOTAL: 170.00 489971 11/10/2023 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 108887 10/10/2023 20231110 665.29 CHECK 489971 TOTAL: 665.29 489972 11/10/2023 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007414008.001 10/12/2023 20231110 23.16 CHECK 489972 TOTAL: 23.16 489973 11/10/2023 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0338675-IN 10/19/2023 20231110 728.75 VINOCOPIA INC 00338674-IN 10/19/2023 20231110 255.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0339125-IN 10/26/2023 20231110 674.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0339124-IN 10/26/2023 20231110 338.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0339126-IN 10/26/2023 20231110 2,352.01 CHECK 489973 TOTAL: 4,349.01 489974 11/10/2023 PRTD 130574 WATSON COMPANY 137598 10/12/2023 20231110 385.21 WATSON COMPANY 137635 10/16/2023 20231110 267.06 CHECK 489974 TOTAL: 652.27 489975 11/10/2023 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 249907 10/25/2023 20231110 1,144.00 CHECK 489975 TOTAL: 1,144.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 11/09/2023 14:02User: MSchauerProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 489976 11/10/2023 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00138267 10/25/2023 20231110 324.00 CHECK 489976 TOTAL: 324.00 489977 11/10/2023 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 249888 01 09/14/2023 20231110 21.41 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 250042 01 09/19/2023 20231110 93.95 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 251324 01 10/13/2023 20231110 102.76 CHECK 489977 TOTAL: 218.12 489978 11/10/2023 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4658 10/19/2023 20231110 197.10 CHECK 489978 TOTAL: 197.10 489979 11/10/2023 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000517 10/19/2023 20231110 117.60 CHECK 489979 TOTAL: 117.60 489980 11/10/2023 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-002155 10/24/2023 20231110 120.04 CHECK 489980 TOTAL: 120.04 489981 11/10/2023 PRTD 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 0195824-IN 10/11/2023 20231110 2,040.00 CHECK 489981 TOTAL: 2,040.00 NUMBER OF CHECKS 179 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,318,626.52 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 179 1,318,626.52 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,318,626.52 Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Joe Abood, General Manager - Braemar Golf Course & Golf Dome Item Activity: Subject:Approve Third Amendment to Lease Agreement with Lancer Food & Beverage, LLC at Braemar Golf Course Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Third Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Lancer Food and Beverage, LLC. and the City of Edina at Braemar Golf Course. INTRODUCTION: Lancer Food and Beverage, LLC, dba Red River Kitchen, provides food and beverage services at Braemar Golf Course to golf course customers, golf programs and events and residents. An additional 5-year lease provides Braemar Golf Course the opportunity to continue to provide a level of food & beverage service that meets the needs of all that visit the Braemar Golf Course property. Lancer Food & Beverage, LLC requests to exercise its option to renew the Lease for an additional 5 years commencing January 1, 2024. ATTACHMENTS: Description Lancer Food & Beverage, LLC Third Amendment to Lease Agreement 1 228008v2 THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) dated _________________, 2023 is entered into, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (“City”) and LANCER FOOD AND BEVERAGE, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, doing business as Red River Kitchen (“Tenant”). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and Tenant’s predecessor, O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC (“O’Reilly”), entered into a “Lease Agreement” commencing on June 1, 2018 (the “Original Lease”) which Lease was amended as follows: (i) a First Amendment to Lease Agreement as approved by the City Council on December 15, 2020 (“First Amendment”); and (ii) a Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 21, 2021 (“Second Amendment”) (collectively the “Original Lease,” “First Amendment,” and “Second Amendment” are collectively referred to herein as the “Lease”); and WHEREAS, the Tenant has exercised its Option to renew the Lease for an additional 5 years commencing January 1, 2024; WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Lease to reflect the agreed upon rent during the first Option term pursuant to Article 3 of the Lease and to address the requirements concerning organized collection; City recognizes the challenges faced in the restaurant industry during the Covid-19 pandemic as well as the off-peak season at a golf course establishment; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, covenants and conditions herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the Tenant and the City, the Tenant and the City agree that the Lease Agreement is hereby modified and amended as follows: 1. Amendment to Article 2. Article 2 of the Lease Agreement is amended to add a new Paragraph M to read as follows: M. Tenant will add organics recycling to back of house operations and follow the requirements of the City’s Green to Go Ordinance for takeout food. 2. Amendment to Article 4. Article 4.B. of the Lease Agreement is amended to read as follows: 2 228008v2 B. The Rent shall be adjusted for the first 5-year Renewal Term (beginning on January 1, 2024) as follows: Peak Months April 1 – September 30th: thirteen and a half percent (13.5%) of Tenant’s gross sales Off-Peak Months October 1 – March 31st: zero percent (0.0%) of Tenant’s gross sales up to $50,000.00 and six percent (6%) of Tenant’s gross sales over and above $50,000.00 3. Clubhouse Study. The parties acknowledge that the City is conducting a facility study for the Clubhouse that may result in a recommendation to renovate or relocate the Clubhouse during the term of this Lease. If the City Council directs a change in the Clubhouse, the parties agree to amend this Lease to address necessary changes to the Tenant’s use of the Leased Premises during any renovation or relocation of the Clubhouse and agree to negotiate in good faith any appropriate changes to the Rent as a result of any impact on Tenant’s operations. 4. Lease Terms. Except as specifically modified or amended by this Amendment, the City and Tenant agree that all of the terms and conditions of the Lease are in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 3 228008v2 CITY OF EDINA By:________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor By:_________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager 4 228008v2 LANCER FOOD AND BEVERAGE, LLC By: Matt King, Its Managing Director THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell, Knutson Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-83: Setting Parks & Recreation Fees for 2024 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-83 setting Parks & Recreation Fees for 2024. INTRODUCTION: Annually, the City Council is asked to review and adopt recommended fees established by the P arks & Recreation Department. The fees for 2024 include Braemar Arena & Field, Braemar Golf Course & Golf Dome, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park, Edina Aquatic Center and Recreation. The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed and recommended the proposed fees at their November 13, 2023, meeting. See attached staff report and resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-83: Setting Parks and Recreation Fees for 2024 Staff Report: Resolution No. 2023-83 Setting Parks and Recreation Fees for 2024 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-83 SETTING PARKS & RECREATION FEES FOR 2024 BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, annually the City Council is asked to review and adopt by resolution recommended fees established by the Parks and Recreation Department for 2024. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following Parks and Recreation fees for 2024. PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS ADULT ACTIVITIES Garden Plot 2023 2024 Community Garden Plot: 10 X 10 $45 $45 Community Garden Plot: 10 X 15 $50 $50 AQUATIC CENTER Season Passes 2023 2024 Resident Purchased by April 30, 2024 (Early Bird Rate): Individual or First Family Member $84 $88 Each Additional Member $77 $81 Resident Purchased After April 30, 2024 (Regular Rate): Individual or First Family Member $94 $98 Each Additional Member $87 $91 Non-Resident Purchased by April 30, 2024 (Early Bird Rate): Individual or First Family Member $107 $112 Each Additional Member $98 $103 Non-Resident Purchased After April 30, 2024 (Regular Rate): Individual or First Family Member $117 $123 Each Additional Member $108 $113 FlowRider 2023 2024 Daily Admission FlowRider Additional/per person $6.50 $7.34 Rental and Instruction: 1 hour $180 $180 Daily Admissions 2023 2024 Daily Admission (resident & non-resident) $12.10 $12.84 Admission after 5 p.m. $9.25 $10.09 Daily Admission FlowRider Additional/per person $6.50 $7.34 Group Reservation Rate $10 $11 Lane Rentals 2023 2024 Aqua Jets $22/hr $25/hr Edina Swim Club Only $17/hr $19.50/hr Birthday Party Packages - 2 hours 2023 2024 Low Tide Package $295 $315 High Tide Package $395 $425 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Green Fees 2023 2024 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee "Prepayment Online" $51.30 $51.30 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee $57 $57 Weekday 18 Hole Player's Club Member "Prepayment Online" $38.70 $38.70 Weekday 18 Hole Player's Club Member $43 $43 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee: Senior "Prepayment Online" $45.90 $45.90 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee: Senior $51 $51 Weekday 18 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior "Prepayment Online" $36 $36 Weekday 18 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior $40 $40 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee: Junior "Prepayment Online" $26.10 $26.10 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee: Junior $29 $29 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee "Prepayment Online" $27.90 $27.90 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee $31 $31 Weekday 9 Hole Player's Club Member "Prepayment Online" $22.50 $22.50 Weekday 9 Hole Player's Club Member $25 $25 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee: Senior "Prepayment Online" $26.10 $26.10 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee: Senior $29 $29 Weekday 9 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior "Prepayment Online" $19.80 $19.80 Weekday 9 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior $22 $22 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee: Junior "Prepayment Online" $17.10 $17.10 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee: Junior $19 $19 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee "Prepayment Online" $56.70 $56.70 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee $63 $63 Weekend 18 Hole Player's Club Member "Prepayment Online" $43.20 $43.20 Weekend 18 Hole Player's Club Member $48 $48 Weekend 18 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior "Prepayment Online" $40.50 $40.50 Weekend 18 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior $45 $45 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee: Junior after 1 p.m. "Prepayment Online" $28.80 $28.80 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee: Junior after 1 p.m. $32 $32 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee "Prepayment Online" $31.50 $31.50 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee $35 $35 Weekend 9 Hole Player's Club Member "Prepayment Online" $26.10 $26.10 Weekend 9 Hole Player's Club Member $29 $29 Weekend 9 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior "Prepayment Online" $24.30 $24.30 Weekend 9 Hole Player's Club Member: Senior $27 $27 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee: Junior after 1 p.m. "Prepayment Online" $18.90 $18.90 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee: Junior after 1 p.m. $21 $21 League Weekday Morning 9-Hole Season $409.32 $415.06 League Weekday Evening 9-Hole Season $341.10 $345.90 League Weekday Morning 18-Hole Season $722.88 $732.98 League Weekday Evening 18-Hole Season $810 $820.13 Player's Club 2023 2024 Platinum Player's Club: Edina Resident $109 $119 Gold Player's Club: Non-Resident $159 $179 League $109 $119 Computerized Handicaps 2023 2024 Player's Club Member $41 $41 Non-Player's Club Member $49 $49 Club Rental and Push Carts 2023 2024 Championship 18 Club Rental: Premium $45 $45 Academy 9 Club Rental $10 $10 Push Carts - 9 Hole $5 $5 Push Carts - 18 Hole $9 $9 Golf Cars 2023 2024 18 Hole Daily Fee $33 $40 18 Hole Player's Club Member $31 $37 9 Hole Daily Fee $20 $24 9 Hole Player's Club Member $19 $21 Golf Outing 2023 2024 Monday Morning Shotgun $88.50 NA Monday Mid-morning Shotgun $92 $110 Friday Morning Shotgun $94.50 $110 Friday Afternoon Shotgun $99 $125 Monday-Thursday Tee Time Start Outing $78.50 $85 Friday-Sunday Tee Time Start Outing $84.50 $91 Braemar Courtyard 2023 2024 Single Lane: Edina Resident $25/hr. $25/hr. Single Lane: Player's Club Member $25/hr. $25/hr. Single Lane: Non-Resident $30/hr. $30/hr. Half Court $90/hr. $90/hr. Full Court $180/hr. $180/hr. Contracted Programs 2023 2024 Golf Professionals Varies Varies Braemar Room 2023 2024 Cooper Conference Room: M-Th 9 a.m.-5 p.m. $40/hr. $40/hr. Cooper Conference Room: M-Th after 5 p.m. $50/hr. $50/hr. Cooper Conference Room: Fri-Sun and Holidays $50/hr. $50/hr. Hoyt Blanchard Room: M-Th 9 a.m.-5 p.m. $75/hr. $75/hr. Hoyt Blanchard Room: M-Th after 5 p.m. $85/hr. $85/hr. Hoyt Blanchard Room: Fri-Sun and Holidays $85/hr. $85/hr. Braemar Driving Range 2023 2024 Large Bucket: Daily Fee $11 $11 Large Bucket: Player's Club Member $10 $10 Small Bucket $6.50 $6.50 ACADEMY 9 COURSE Greens Fees 2023 2024 Academy 9 Daily Fee "Prepayment Online" $17.10 $17.10 Academy 9 Daily Fee $19 $19 Academy 9 Player's Club Member "Prepayment Online" $14.40 $14.40 Academy 9 Player's Club Member $16 $16 Junior "Prepayment Online" $10.80 $10.80 Junior $12 $12 Youth on Course - MGA $5 $5 League Academy 9 Season $216.72 $219.80 Golf Cars 2023 2024 Academy 9 Daily Fee $16 $20 Academy 9 Players Club Member $15 $17 Push Carts $5 $5 Player's Club 2023 2024 Resident Player's Club $35 $35 Non-Resident Player's Club $60 $60 League $35 $35 GOLF DOME 2023 2024 Time Golf 1/2 hour $17 $17 Time Golf 1/2 hour Player's Club Member $16 $16 Time Golf 1/4 hour: Additional Time Only $9 $9 Hourly Field Rental $175 $175 Monday-Thursday Time Golf 1/2 hour: Senior Player's Club $10 $10 Golf Dome Guest Professional Instruction Fee: 1/2 hour $25 $25 Golf Dome Guest Professional Instruction Fee: 1 hour $40 $40 Golf Dome Legacy Professional Instruction Fee $12/lesson $12/lesson Time Golf 1 hour $32 $32 Time Golf 2 hours $60 $60 Time Golf 1 hour Player's Club Member $30 $30 Time Golf 2 hours Player's Club Member $56 $56 Promotional Time Golf 1 hour $25 $25 High School Time Golf 1 hour per bay $25 $25 Online Reservation and Prepayment $65 $65 Online Reservation and Prepayment Player’s Club $55 $55 Player's Club 2023 2024 Resident Golf Dome Player's Club $35 $35 Non-Resident Golf Dome Player's Club $60 $60 EDINBOROUGH PARK Pool & Track Daily Admission 2023 2024 Residents and Non-Residents $8.37 $9.17 Pool & Track 10 Admission Pass 2023 2024 Residents and Non-Residents $75 $87 Pool & Track Annual Membership 2023 2024 Resident Individual $340 $350 Each Additional Member $140 $144 Non-Resident Individual $385 $397 Each Additional Member $160 $165 Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 Birthday Party Packages/2 Hours 2023 2024 The Peak Package $180 $180 The Adventure Package $270 $270 Fam Jam Package $390 $390 The BIG Birthday Adventure Package $510 $510 Building Rentals/Non-Exclusive Rentals/Hr 2023 2024 Theater $300 $325 Theater with Audio-Visual Equipment $350 $375 Pool (swim team only) TBD $73.50 Pool Other $78 $84 EDINBOROUGH PARK "PLAYPARK" Playpark Daily Admission 2023 2024 Resident and Non-Resident $8.37 $9.17 Children Under 1 year-old Free Free Adults Free w/paid child Free w/paid child Group Reservation Rate $7 $8 Admission After 5 p.m. (summer only) $6 $6.42 Playpark - 10 Admission Pass 2023 2024 Resident and Non-Resident $75 $87 Playpark Annual Membership 2023 2024 Resident Individual $121 $133 Each Additional Member $96 $105 Non-Resident Individual $151 $165 Each Additional Member $127 $140 Total Facility Daily Admission 2023 2024 Resident $15 $17 Non-Resident $15 $17 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Rental Concession Items 2023 2024 Paddle Boats: 4-person boat /per 45 minutes $20 $18.34 Winter Sled/Trainer per hour $8 $9.17 Ice Skate $8 $9.17 Fishing Pole $3 $2.75 Building Rentals 2023 2024 1/2 room, Monday-Thursday, ending by 8 p.m. $425 $412.75 1/2 room, Monday-Thursday, ending by 10 p.m. $500 $504.47 1/2 room, Sunday, 6 hours $600 $569.19 Full room Friday or Saturday, ending by 8 p.m. $1,625 $1,605.14 Full room Friday or Saturday, ending by 10 p.m. $1,875 $1,857.37 Full room Monday-Thursday, ending by 8 p.m. $600 $596.19 Full room Monday-Thursday, ending by 10 p.m. $700 $687.92 Full Room, Sunday, 6 hours $900 $871.36 Amphitheater Rental (3-hour rental) $425 $412.75 Commercial Photo Shoot $50/hr $45.86 Lawn Games 2023 2024 18 Hole Golf $10 $10.09 Lawn Bowling Court $20/hr $18.34 Scottish Links $6 $6.42 BRAEMAR ARENA *New rates begin April 1, 2024 Hourly Rates (except where noted) 2023 2024 Prime Hourly Rate (9/16 – 3/15) $262 $269 Prime Season Late Night: After 9 p.m. $195 $201 Off-Season $200 $206 Off-Season Late Night: After 9 p.m. $175 $180 Off-Season Tournament $210 $216 In-Season Early Morning $170 $175 Early Morning Training Ice (6-8 a.m.) $130 $134 Backyard Rink Early Morning/undesirable Ice $75 $77 Backyard Rink – Prime – EHA Day/Late Night $155 $159 Open Skating (youth and adult) $5/person $5/person Skate Rental $5/rental $5/rental Birthday Party Open Skating $125 $125 Room Rental $30/day $30/day Futsal; Backyard Rink $35 $35 Holiday Ice: Arena $325 $335 Holiday Ice: Backyard $225 $230 Tournament Headquarter Room $100/day $100/day Event Vendor Fee $50/event/vendor $50/event/vendor “2 Day Notice” Ice Rental 10% discount 10% discount Equipment Storage $25/day; $50/wknd $25/day; $50/wknd Memberships (set the first week of September) 2023 2024 Open Skating Membership Resident Individual $125 NA Arena – Activity Admissions 2023 2024 Non-School Day Youth Open Hockey $5/child $5/child Arena - Adult Activities 2023 2024 Adult Open Hockey $5/person $5/person BRAEMAR FIELD (Dome) *New Rates begin Nov. 1, 2024 Hourly Rates (except where noted) 2023 2024 Full Field Prime (M-F 4-10 p.m./Sat and Sun 7 a.m.-9 p.m.) $425 $437 1/2 Field Prime (M-F 4-10 p.m./Sat and Sun 7 a.m.-9 p.m.) $225 $231 1/4 Field Prime (M-F 4-10 p.m./Sat and Sun 7 a.m.-9 p.m.) $125 $128 Full Field Non-Prime (M-F 9 a.m.-4 p.m.; Sat/Sun before 7 a.m. or after 9 p.m.) $350 $360 ½ Field Non-Prime (M-F 9 a.m.-4 p.m.; Sat/Sun before 7 a.m. or after 9 p.m.) $200 $206 ¼ Field Non-Prime (M-F 9 a.m.-4 p.m.; Sat/Sun before 7 a.m. or after 9 p.m.) $125 $128 70' Batting Cage: 1/2 hour $30 $30 50' Batting Cage: 1/2 hour $25 $25 Full Field Daytime (M-F 9 a.m.-4 p.m.) $175 $180 1/2 Field Daytime (M-F 9 a.m.-4 p.m.) $80 $82 1/4 Field Daytime (M-F 9 a.m.-4 p.m.) $40 $41 Open Turf Time (drop-in) $5/person $5/person “2 Day Notice” Dome Rental 10% discount 10% discount Individual Season Pass $125 $125 Birthday Party (1 hour) $100 $100 Edina Athletic Association Rentals Hourly Rates (Baseball, Football, Lacrosse and Soccer) 2023 2024 Primetime: 5-10 p.m. (Jan. - April)/Monday-Friday $390 $401 1/2 Field Primetime: 5-10 p.m. (Jan. - April)/Monday-Friday $195 $200 Primetime: 8 a.m.-10 p.m. (Jan. - April)/Saturdays $390 $401 1/2 Field Primetime: 8 a.m.-10 p.m. (Jan. - April)/Saturdays $195 $200 Primetime: 8 a.m.-5 p.m. (Jan. - April)/Sundays $390 $401 1/2 Field Primetime: 8 a.m.-5 p.m. (Jan. - April)/Sundays $195 $200 Off Hours: All Other (Jan. - April)/All $315 $324 1/2 Field Off Hours: All Other (Jan. - April)/All $157 $161 Shoulder Season: All Hours October-December $365 $375 1/2 Field Shoulder Season: All Hours October-December $183 $188 Braemar Field - Activities and Events 2023 2024 Tot Time $5/person/per session $5/person/pe r session Open Soccer $5/person/per session $5/person/per session Family Time at Braemar Field $5/person/per session $5/person/pe r session Open Dome Time at Braemar Field $5/person/per session $5/person/pe r session PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS General Park Areas 2023 2024 Resident Use/per hour $60 $62 Resident Use/per day $180 $185 Non-Resident Use/per hour $70 $72 Non-Resident Use/per day $210 $216 Commercial Use (i.e., TV)/per hour $60 $62 Commercial Use with Light/per hour $80 $82 Mobile Food Unit $30 $31 Mobile Food Unit Annual Pass $550 $550 Maintenance/Custodial/per hour $60 $62 Athletic Fields 2023 2024 Resident Per Field/per day $180 NA Non-Resident Per Field/per day $210 NA Per Field/Per Hour: Resident $60 $70 Per Field/Per Hour: Non-Resident $70 $80 Lights add-on $15/hr $15/hr Turf Full Field (Pamela & Braemar)/Per Hour: Resident $70 $75 Turf Full Field (Pamela & Braemar)/Per Hour: Non-Resident $100 $110 Turf Half Field (Pamela & Braemar)/Per Hour: Resident $45 $50 Turf Half Field (Pamela & Braemar)/Per Hour: Non-Resident $65 $75 Maintenance/Custodial: per hour $55 $55 Athletic Association Clinics and Camps/per day/per field $55 $55 Athletic Association Tournaments $185 $185 Sand Volleyball Court/per hour $15 $15 Van Valkenburg/Courtney Fields 2023 2024 Per Field/Per Day: Includes Building - Residents $200 $210 Per Field Per Day: Includes Building - Non-Residents $235 $245 Rosland Park Pathway (Scheduled Walk/Run Events) 2023 2024 Per Day $275 $285 ARNESON ACRES 2023 2024 Terrace Room & Gazebo Half-Day (8 a.m.-2 p.m.; 4-10 p.m.) $280 $288 Full-Day (8 a.m.-10 p.m.) $380 $391 PICNIC SHELTER RENTALS 2023 2024 Chowen Park: Half-Day $37 $38 Chowen Park: Full-Day $53 $55 Fred Richards Park: Half-Day $37 $38 Fred Richards Park: Full-Day $53 $55 Sherwood Park: Half-Day $37 $38 Sherwood Park: Full-Day $53 $55 Wooddale Park: Half-Day $37 $38 Wooddale Park: Full-Day $53 $55 Utley Park: Half-Day $37 $38 Utley Park: Full-Day $53 $55 Rosland Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Rosland Park: Full-Day $163 $168 PARK SHELTER BUILDINGS RENTALS 2023 2024 Arden Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Arden Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Cornelia School Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Cornelia School Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Countryside Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Countryside Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Pamela Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Pamela Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Todd Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Todd Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Walnut Ridge Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Walnut Ridge Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Weber Park: Half-Day $84 $87 Weber Park: Full-Day $121 $125 Creek Valley Park $19 $20 Highlands Park $19 $20 Lewis Park $19 $20 Normandale Park $19 $20 Strachauer Park $19 $20 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS 2023 2024 Field User Fee/per participant $13 $13 Gymnasium User Fee/per Participant $13 $7 Outdoor Hockey Rink User Fee/per participant $13 $13 Inclusion Fee/per participant $1 $1 EDINA SENIOR CENTER Room Rental 2023 2024 Aquarium Room: Resident $25/hr. $25/hr. Aquarium Room: Non-Resident $30/hr. $30/hr. Classroom 1, 2, 3 or 4: Resident (2 hr. minimum) $45/hr. $45/hr. Classroom 1, 2, 3 or 4: Non-Resident (2 hr. minimum) $50/hr. $50/hr. Grandview Room: Resident (2 hr. minimum) $65/hr. $65/hr. Grandview Room: Non-Resident (2 hr. minimum) $70/hr. $70/hr. Fireside Room: Half-day (8 a.m.-2 p.m.; 4-10 p.m.) $480 $480 Fireside Room: Full-day (8 a.m.-10 p.m.) $720 $720 Wall Art Display Rental 15% of sale 15% of sale Dated: November 21, 2023 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Nov. 21, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2023. City Clerk November 21, 2023 Mayor & City Council Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Resolution No. 2023-83: Setting Parks & Recreation Fees for 2024 Information / Background: Annually the City Council is asked to review and adopt by resolution recommended fees established by the Parks & Recreation Department for 2024. Fee Philosophy Traditionally fees are set based upon several factors such as a corresponding market comparison of similar or like offerings at neighboring communities, fee history, customer satisfaction, operating budget and cost recovery expectations. The blend of these philosophies establishes a fee range that provides equal opportunity, affordability, and accessibility to users and guests that utilize our facilities. It also provides an opportunity to cover costs whenever possible. Factors impacting Costs Several factors are considered when establishing cost increases to the proposed 2024 rates. Among the most notable are: • Ability to recruit, train and retain high quality and appropriate number of staff (both full-time and seasonal) for programs and facilities. This has included increases in not only hourly wages, but costs associated with incentive offerings for various positions, such as lifeguards and program staff. • Ensuring that we maintain a high level of customer service and safety at each of our facilities by being able to recruit an appropriate number of staff. • Ability to adequately navigate continued cost pressures, supply chain issues and continued increased costs with contractor and specialty repairs due to high demand for trade providers/vendors. Based on recent Consumer Price Indexes (CPI), costs across the board are still expected to increase 3.9% in 2024. • Maintain a quality and valued product that is well operated, maintained and safe. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Revenue Sources Each facility’s revenue sources are unique and are highlighted below in greater detail: Aquatic Center • An increase of 5% is being proposed for all season passes. • Proposed overall pricing continues to keep us in line with similar facilities such as St. Louis Park, Richfield, Bloomington and Eagan. • On-going repairs to aging mechanical and operational items at the aquatic center continue to be a key factor. • On-going pressures with seasonal pay/staffing continue to impact our operational pricing structure. Braemar Golf Operations • Increases are being recommended for the Player’s Card. Cards would be limited in quantity sold to ensure users receive value from the card and have an opportunity to use it. • Increases are being proposed for the Golf Cars due to the increase associated with the new golf car lease. • Increase is being proposed for golf outings; fees were not increased last year when green fees were increased. The proposed rate for 2024 includes new golf car rates and a more accurate cost of hosting these events. • No proposed changes are recommended for the Golf Dome rates. • On-going pressures with seasonal pay/staffing will continue to impact our operational pricing structure. • Industry standard and similar facilities for golf course comparison include Chaska Town Course, Edinborough USA, Brookview Golf Course, Keller Golf Course and Baker National Golf Course. Braemar Ice Arena/Field • An increase of the prime-time & non-prime-time ice rates are recommended. This puts our rates for prime-time ice in the top 3% percentile compared to neighboring cities. Non-prime pricing is also higher than other comparable ice rinks, but Braemar Arena demand continues to remain higher. • Ice rate increases would go into effect April 1, 2024. This would follow suit with how we structure the timing for Braemar Field increases. • Braemar Field fee increases for youth athletic associations would go into effect Nov. 1, 2024, for the season. • On-going pressures with seasonal pay/staffing will continue to impact our operational pricing structure. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Centennial Lakes Park • Minimal increases for rental concession items and other rentals are being recommended for this year. • On-going pressures with seasonal pay/staffing will continue to impact our operational pricing structure. Edinborough Park • A 3% increase in Pool & Track Annual Memberships is being proposed. • A 10% increase for a Playpark Annual Membership is being proposed. This equates to an Edina resident member visiting 15 times in a calendar year to pay for their membership. The number of visits required to break-even is reduced for each additional member. • On-going pressures with seasonal pay/staffing will continue to impact our operational pricing structure. Parks and Recreation • A number of the rental fees for athletic association fields, park buildings and picnic shelters are proposed with a minimal increase for the upcoming season. • Staff is recommending a reduction in the Youth Athletic Association Gymnasium User Fee/Participant. This fee for indoor use only provides the association priority and a reduced school district rate but the city does not schedule the gymnasium use. Whereas with the Field and Outdoor Hockey Rink User/Per Participant Fee, the city schedules and provides the space to the association. • Staff is proposing a minimal increase to rent the pathway at Rosland Park for walk/run events. A change in past practice would be to not allow events of this nature during the Edina Aquatic Season due to logistics and parking issues. Action Requested: Staff requests approval of Resolution No. 2023-83 setting Parks & Recreation fees for 2024. The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed and recommended the proposed fees at the November 13, 2023, meeting. This fee structure includes Braemar Arena & Field, Braemar Golf Course & Golf Dome, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park, Edina Aquatic Center and Recreation. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Edina Art Center Schematic Design Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of Edina Art Center professional schematic design services with HGA for $97,700. INTRODUCTION: At the Sept. 19, 2023 City Council meeting, Council approved and authorized staff to execute a Letter of Intent with Hennepin County for the colocation of the Edina Art Center with the Southdale Library Project. HGA has already been instrumental in assisting with initial space planning work for possible Art Center space as well as with the concept design process. As both City and Hennepin County move into the schematic design phase process, HGA's proposed professional services allows the city to continue to advise Hennepin County's project architect (MSR Design) on space and infrastructure required for a comprehensive, effective, sustainable and successful art making space. Funding is from the Capital Improvement Program designated for art center planning. The proposed services, from HGA also include a business plan that will be developed by Webb Management Services, Inc. Webb Management Services is a national leading provider of advisory services for the development and operation of cultural facilities. Webb Management's work will create a business plan planning process to develop programming strategy, organization design, operating policy and pro-forma operating budget for the new art center space. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Edina Art Center Schematic Design Services Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300216 Department:P&R Art Center Buyer:Tracy Petersen Date: 11/14/2023 Requisition Description:Edina Art Center Schematic Design Services Vendor:HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC Cost:$97,700.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Design services for schematic design phase for Edina Art Center BUDGET IMPACT: CIP Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Provide new art making space for the Edina community ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): N/A Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:N/A Carbon Emissions:N/A Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Zoning Code Audit Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Zoning Code Audit with HKGi for $30,000. INTRODUCTION: The current zoning code has not been comprehensively updated since the 1970s. From time to time, it is critical to review, analyze and update zoning regulations to ensure that they are aligned with City goals and working to achieve desired development outcomes. T he zoning code audit will provide a tool for identifying and clarifying code issues, opportunities for improvements, and prioritizing future code updates. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Zoning Code Audit Proposal / Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number Environmental Impact - item specific: 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12300219 Department:Development Buyer:Cary Teague Date: 11/15/2023 Requisition Description:Zoning Audit Vendor:HKGI Cost:$30,000.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION:Audit of the City's Zoning Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: This project is within the Community Development Department Budget Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle: Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Collaborate. Listen. Explore. Create. 800 Washington Avenue North, Suite 103 Minneapolis, MN 55401 November 14, 2023 TO: ADDISON LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR | CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET, EDINA, MN, 55424 RE: Proposal for Zoning Code Audit PROJECT UNDERSTANDING City staff has requested that HKGi provide a project work scope, schedule, and estimated costs for a Zoning Code Audit. Staff stated that the current zoning code is outdated, with the last major update occurring in the 1970s. Based on our October 25, 2023 meeting with planning staff and follow-up communications, HKGi’s understanding of the city’s needs for a zoning code audit include the following: »A comprehensive review of the zoning code has not been conducted in a long time so an evaluation of the code’s overall structure is needed. »Simple development projects such as site plan review, lot splits, and planned unit development, are often subject to complex and time-consuming procedures. »The zoning code’s districts need updating, including barriers to contemporary development types, e.g. Missing Middle Housing., and standards based on complex formulas. »The city’s comprehensive plan, adopted in 2020, contains guidance for more fiexible residential development and densities that may not be adequately refiected in the zoning districts’ standards. »The city has utilized a mix of older planned districts (PRD, PCD, PID, POD) and more recent planned unit districts (PUD). There is interest in reducing the city’s reliance on PUDs which may result in the need for creating new base districts in the zoning code. A zoning code audit will provide a tool for identifying and clarifying zoning code issues, opportunities for improvements, and priorities for updates. City staff identifled the following priorities for the zoning code audit: »Overall zoning code structure. »Zoning districts and supplementary district regulations »Site Plan Review »Planned Unit Development »Subdivision regulations relating to lot splits Per staff’s request, HKGi has assembled a proposed project work scope, schedule, and estimated fees to conduct a Zoning Code Audit consisting of four (4) tasks. November 14, 2023 Zoning Code Audit City of Edina Collaborate. Listen. Explore. Create. 2 FIRM PROFILE & EXPERIENCE Attached is a flrm proflle and a summary of zoning code experience for HKGi. PROPOSED PROJECT WORK SCOPE Task 1 - Evaluate Structure of Zoning & Subdivision Codes 1.1 Kickoff meeting with staff 1.2 Initial high-level scan of code structure issues 1.3 Review relevant guidance from comprehensive and small area plans 1.4 Code issues and opportunities work session with staff 1.5 Detailed evaluation of code structure 1.6 Prepare proposed code structure Deliverable: Technical memo Meetings: Staff (1 or 2) Task 2 - Evaluate Districts and Supplementary Regulations 2.1 Analyze districts utilizing GIS mapping (Zoning Map) 2.2 Analyze building height overlay district (Article 11) 2.3 Analyze Supplementary District Regulations (Article 12, Div. 2) 2.4 Staff meetings 2.5 Planning Commission meeting Deliverable: Technical memo, PC meeting presentation Meetings: Staff (1 or 2) Planning Commission (1) Task 3 - Evaluate Development Procedures – Site Plan Review, Subdivision, PUD 3.1 Analyze Site Plan Review (Article 3) 3.2 Analyze Subdivisions relating to lot splits (Chapter 32) 3.3 Analyze Planned Unit Development (Article 4, Division 2, Subd. 3) 3.4 Staff meetings 3.5 Planning Commission meeting Deliverable: Technical memo, PC meeting presentation Meetings: Staff (1 or 2) Planning Commission (1) Task 4 - Prepare Code Audit Report 4.1 Summarize flndings 4.2 Identify recommendations and update priorities 4.3 Staff meeting November 14, 2023 Zoning Code Audit City of Edina Collaborate. Listen. Explore. Create. 3 4.4 Prepare draft report 4.5 Joint City Council & Planning Commission meeting 4.6 Prepare flnal report Deliverable: Draft and flnal versions of audit report, Joint CC/PC meeting presentation Meetings: Staff (1) Joint City Council / Planning Commission (1) PROJECT SCHEDULE HKGi has the capacity to begin this project in December and we anticipate it to be a 6 - 8 month project with a targeted June 1 completion date. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Task 1: ............................. $7,400 Task 2: ............................. $8,500 Task 3: ............................. $5,600 Task 4: ............................. $8,300 Reimbursables: .................. $200 Total:…………………$30,000 Please review our proposed work scope, schedule, and estimated costs and let us know if you have any questions, concerns, and/or suggested revisions. Thanks for inviting HKGi to assist City staff with this flrst step in updating and improving the City’s zoning and subdivision codes. We look forward to working with you! SINCERELY, JEFF MILLER, AICP ASSOCIATE | JEFF.MILLER@HKGI.COM | 612-720-8311 SIGNATURE OF ACCEPTANCE: CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE DATE FIRM PROFILE LOCATION800 Washington Ave. N., #103Minneapolis, MN 55401www.hkgi.com612-338-0800 PRINCIPALS -Paul Paige, PLA (MN), President -Brad Scheib, AICP, Vice President -Bryan Harjes, PLA (MN, MI), LEED AP, Vice President -Gabrielle Grinde, PLA (MN), Vice President ASSOCIATES -Rita Trapp, AICP, LEED AP -Jeff Miller, AICP STAFF 4 Certified Planners 7 Licensed Landscape Architects 8 Planners/Urban Designers 2 Marketing Communications HKGi was established in 1982 to provide community-based planning and landscape architecture services to clients throughout the Upper Midwest. HKGi uses a community-based approach that has been at the heart of our practice since the firm’s founding. Gathering and responding to community input has always been essential to ensuring that our plans and designs are feasible, supported by the community, and will generate positive results for our clients and their constituents. Our emphasis on listening and collaboration, combined with our technical knowledge, means we deliver custom-built plans that fit each community’s unique needs, opportunities, and vision for the future. ZONING ORDINANCES AND REGULATORY TOOLS For our zoning ordinance and regulatory tools work, HKGi’s planners can tap into a broad range of community planning and design experience to aid in creating effective ordinances. Our planning staff are experienced at comprehensive planning, development application reviews, ordinance revisions, and redevelopment, corridor, and growth area planning. This breadth of experience means that we understand how to transform a variety of planning guidance and direction into enforceable zoning language. We also understand the impact that zoning ordinances can have on development. Our day-to-day planning work reviewing development applications gives us insight into how to craft ordinances that meet community objectives while minimizing unintended consequences. HKGi has extensive experience updating city and county zoning and subdivision codes to better align with contemporary development and regulatory needs. Typically, our client communities undertake code updates in order to align with current development practices, updated comprehensive plans, best practices from other cities, and changes to state statutes. HKGi’s experience ranges from full code rewrites to updates addressing topics such as housing standards, form-based standards, mixed use districts, parking, and signage. HKGi has conducted zoning/subdivision code updates in the following cities and counties: »Benton County, MN »Byron, MN »Chaska, MN »Eden Prairie, MN »Faribault, MN »Farmington, MN »Fridley, MN »Golden Valley, MN »Greenfield, MN »Grand Marais, MN »Inver Grove Heights, MN »Kasson, MN »Lindstrom, MN »Maplewood, MN »Marine on St. Croix, MN »Medicine Lake, MN »Minneapolis, MN HKGi ZONING CODE EXPERIENCE30+ZONING CODE PROJECTS! MAP KEY COUNTYCITY »Mound, MN »Richfield, MN »Rogers, MN »Rosemount, MN »Roseville, MN »Saint Paul, MN »Savage, MN »Shoreview, MN »Stearns County, MN »St. Francis, MN »Stillwater, MN »St. Louis Park, MN »Winona, MN »Greenville, WI »Onalaska, WI »Johnston, IA Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1 for ENG 21-9NB Nine Mile Creek Vegetation Management Oversight Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Change Order No. 1 for ENG 21-9NB Nine Mile Creek Vegetation Management Oversight for $12,303. INTRODUCTION: The proposal includes a contract change of $12,303 with Resource Environmental Services, LLC (RES) and an extension of 1 year. T he changes include an additional year of oversight to sync up with the management done by others and grant reporting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1: ENG 21-9NB Nine Mile Creek Vegetation Management Oversight Change Order Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100106 Department:Engineering Buyer:Jessica V. Wilson Date: 11/21/2023 Requisition Description:Change Order No. 1: ENG 21-9NBNine Mile Creek5HVWRUDWLRQ3URMHFW (FRORJLFDO6XSSRUW6HUYLFH Vendor:APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC Cost:$12,303.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:ENG 21-9NBNine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support ServLFHV 7KH&LW\DJUHHGWRDVVXPHPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKH1LQH0LOH&UHHN5HVWRUDWLRQ3URMHFWIURPWKH1LQH0LOH &UHHN:DWHUVKHG'LVWULFWZKHQLWDSSURYHGWKHSURMHFWPDLQWHQDQFHSODQLQVSULQJRI7KHVXSSRUW VHUYLFHVFRQWUDFWLVIRUVLWHLQVSHFWLRQVELGGHYHORSPHQWDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQRYHUVLJKWIRUDQG The original contract amount was $33,773.00. Change order No. 1 provides for an extension of the contract for 1 year. The changes include an additional year of oversight to sync up with the management done by others and grant reporting. The change order proposal is $12,303.00. The sum of the original contract and change order no. 1 is $46,076. BUDGETIMPACT: Stormwater Utility CIP#ENG21057 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: 6LWHLQVSHFWLRQVDQGPaintenance of WKH1LQH0LOH&UHHN6WUHDPEDQN3URMHFWZLOOHQVXUHWKHLQYHVWPHQWPDGH IRUstreambank stabilization and clean water featuresODVWLQWKHORQJWHUP ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Managed natural areas reduceerosion and invasive species Minnesota Office 20276 Delaware Avenue Jordan, MN 55352 Corporate Headquarters 6575 West Loop South, Suite 300 Bellaire, TX 77401 Main: 713.520.5400 Edina Nine Mile Creek – RES Change Order for 2024 Construction Oversight & Reporting 1 November 13, 2023 Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Manager City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Subject: Edina Nine Mile Creek – RES Change Order for 2024 Construction Oversight & Reporting Dear Jessica, Thank you for requesting this change order from Resource Environmental Solutions (RES) for Nine Mile Creek Construction Oversight as part of our Master Agreement with the City of Edina. When this project began, two years of construction oversight were anticipated. After our initial evaluation of restoration progress and scope changes, it was decided that three years of construction oversight would be needed. This change order addresses the third year of construction oversight, to be conducted in 2024, including assessment of performance standards throughout the growing season. This change order also covers final reporting for the project, including both a summary report for the City of Edina and additional support for grant reporting to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD). RES appreciates the opportunity to present you with this proposal. Please contact us if you have any questions, comments, or additional needs. We look forward to continuing our work with you and the City of Edina. Sincerely, Doug Mensing, MS Benjamin Staehlin, MS Project Director | Senior Ecologist Project Manager | Ecologist 3 dmensing@res.us | (612) 202-2252 bstaehlin@res.us | (773) 251-0960 Edina Nine Mile Creek – RES Change Order for 2024 Construction Oversight & Reporting 2 PROJECT TASKS Task 1. Conduct Construction Oversight 2024 RES will conduct a third year of construction oversight for the Nine Mile Creek vegetation management project in 2024. This will include an inspection in Spring 2024 with Stantec and City staff to determine required tasks for the year. It will also include visits in mid-summer and early fall to review completed work and assess performance standards, and a visit to confirm any late-season contractor activity in Fall 2024. RES will prepare summary emails following all site visits to document the work completed and suggest necessary follow- up actions. RES will also provide additional project coordination and oversight as needed. Deliverables: a) Four (4) site visits; b) summary emails of site conditions, including assessment of performance standards; c) additional project management and coordination emails, as needed Task 2. Final Reporting At the completion of the project, RES will prepare a final report detailing the work completed during the course of the project and summarize attainment of performance standards by Stantec. RES will also work with the City of Edina to prepare a section detailing future management tasks and goals for the project areas. Additionally, RES will assist the City in preparing information needed to complete the grant reporting required by NMCWD in order for the City to be reimbursed for this work. RES will prepare text, maps, figures, or other materials as requested by the City. Deliverables: a) Final project report; b) additional support for NMCWD grant reporting, as needed BUDGET Task Description AES Labor ($) AES Expenses ($) Total Budget ($) Task 1 Conduct Construction Oversight 2024 $ 6,770 $ 48 $ 6,818 Task 2 Final Reporting $ 5,485 $ 0 $ 5,485 Project Total $ 12,255 $ 48 $ 12,303 Edina Nine Mile Creek – RES Change Order for 2024 Construction Oversight & Reporting 3 Acceptance In signing below, each party agrees to abide by all terms and conditions presented in this Agreement and the defined contents. Work will begin upon receipt of this signed authorization. **PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN to RES. An executed contract amendment containing both signatures will be returned to you. This Agreement is not binding upon RES until executed by an officer of RES. Table 1 – RES RES, LLC Signature: Date: Name: Title: 6575 West Loop South, Suite 300 Bellaire, TX 77401 Phone: 713.520.5400 Fax: Email: Table 2 – City of Edina Client: City of Edina Signature: Date: Name: Title: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Table 3 - Billing Billing Address: Mark if same as above. Company: Name: Title: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ryan Browning, I.T. Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase for 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure from LOGIS for $106,274. INTRODUCTION: This purchase covers the new fiber and a network switch to provide the connectivity for the new cameras in the 50th and France area. This will provide additional coverage in ramps and intersections for public safety purposes. The item is in conjunction with Request for Purchase - 50th and France Security Cameras and Storage. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 Request for Purchase Department: Information Technology Buyer: Ryan Browning, I.T. Directory Date: 11/21/2023 Requisition Description: 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure Vendor: LOGIS (CDWG) Cost: $106,274.04 REPLACEMENT or NEW: NEW PURCHASE SOURCE: COOP - NATIONAL, STATE, COUNTY COOP DESCRIPTION: This purchase covers the new fiber and a network switch to provide the connectivity for the new cameras in the 50th and France area. This will provide additional coverage in ramps and intersections for public safety purposes. The item is in conjunction with Request for Purchase - 50th and France Security Cameras and Storage. BUDGET IMPACT: This expenditure will be paid for with ARPA funds and is within budget. Requisition Number 12300218 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: These items provide the backbone for the security camera additions in the 50th and France Area. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: We do not expect an environmental impact from this purchase. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ryan Browning, I.T. Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 50th and France Security Cameras and Storage Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase for 50th and France Cameras and Storage from Pro-Tec for $209,650. INTRODUCTION: This purchase covers new cameras and storage for the 50th and France area. T his will provide additional coverage in ramps and intersections for public safety purposes. The item is in conjunction with the Request for Purchase - 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 50th and France Security Cameras and Storage 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 Request for Purchase Department: Information Technology Buyer: Ryan Browning, I.T. Director Date: 11/21/2023 Requisition Description: 50th and France Cameras and Storage Vendor: Pro-Tec Design Cost: $209,650.74 REPLACEMENT or NEW: NEW PURCHASE SOURCE: STATE CONTRACT - State of MN Contract 184435 DESCRIPTION: This purchase covers new cameras and storage for the 50th and France area. This will provide additional coverage in ramps and intersections for public safety purposes. The item is in conjunction with the Request for Purchase - 50th and France Security Camera Infrastructure. BUDGET IMPACT: This expenditure will be paid for by ARPA funds and is within budget. Requisition Number 12300217 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: These items provide additional camera coverage for public safety purposes. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: We do not expect an environmental impact from this purchase. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve 2024 City Observances/Days of Significance Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve City Observances/Days of Significance for 2024. INTRODUCTION: With the City Council's equity statement in mind, the Communications Department, in partnership with the Race and Equity Division, works to be more intentional in recognizing certain dates that celebrate the racial, cultural and religious diversity in Edina. Since 2021, the City Council has annually approved a list of observances/days of significance to "celebrate." For 2024, the following list (which includes federal holidays) is recommended: Jan. 1 – New Year’s Day Jan. 15 – Martin Luther King Jr. Day February – Black History Month Feb. 10 – Lunar New Year (formerly called “Chinese New Year”) Feb. 19 – Presidents’ Day March – Women’s History Month March 8 – International Women’s Day May – Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month May 27 – Memorial Day June – Pride Month June 19 – Juneteenth July 4 – Independence Day Sept. 2 – Labor Day Sept. 11 – P atriot Day (9/11) Sept. 15-Oct. 15 – Hispanic Heritage Month Oct. 14 – Indigenous Peoples Day November – Native American Heritage Month Nov. 28 – T hanksgiving Dec. 25 – Christmas ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Nov. 21, 2023 Mayor and City Council Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director Approve 2024 City Observances/Days of Significance Information / Background: With the City Council's equity statement in mind, the Communications Department, in partnership with the Race and Equity Division, works be more intentional in recognizing certain dates that celebrate the racial, cultural and religious diversity in Edina. For 2021, the Communications Department asked the City Council to approve a list observances/days of significance to “celebrate,” in addition to federal holidays and religious observances previously approved by the City. Upon approval, the City began acknowledging these days in at least following ways: Acknowledgment on the home page of the City’s website, EdinaMN.gov Listing on City Calendar (website and/or print) Message on outdoor message board at City Hall Edina TV video bulletin board message Edinet (internal employee website) post or banner image Social media post For 2022, three more dates were added: Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Hispanic Heritage Month and Native American Heritage Month. The Fire Department began listing the days on its outdoor message board at Fire Station 1 that year, too. Social media posts were expanded to all City accounts, including those of our public safety departments and enterprise facilities. For 2023, May was renamed “Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month” to be consistent with recognition at the federal level. No other changes were made to the list or the way in which the observances/days are acknowledged by the City of Edina. However, over the course of 2023, the City has received more feedback than ever before on our “Days of Significance,” particularly when the City has recognized a religious holiday or observance. Those who are opposed cite a preference for a “separation between church and state.” STAFF REPORT Page 2 Staff in our Parks & Recreation and Police departments have also asked that we not require posts on their channels. Some posts see low or no engagement. Others are not a “fit.” For example, Islam prohibits the consumption of alcohol, so promoting Muslim holidays on the Edina Liquor social media accounts is not sensitive to that religion. Representatives of the Administration, Communications, Parks & Recreation and Police met earlier this year and recommend the Observances/Days of Significance no longer include religious dates/observances and that recognition not extend to social media channels beyond the City’s primary accounts. It is also recommended that 9/11 be added to the list. Including federal holidays, the list would then be as follows: Jan. 1 – New Year’s Day Jan. 15 – Martin Luther King Jr. Day February – Black History Month Feb. 10 – Lunar New Year (formerly called “Chinese New Year”) Feb. 19 – Presidents’ Day March – Women’s History Month March 8 – International Women’s Day May – Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month May 27 – Memorial Day June – Pride Month June 19 – Juneteenth July 4 – Independence Day Sept. 2 – Labor Day Sept. 11 – Patriot Day (9/11) Sept. 15-Oct. 15 – Hispanic Heritage Month Oct. 14 – Indigenous Peoples Day November – Native American Heritage Month Nov. 28 – Thanksgiving Dec. 25 – Christmas The list of City Observances/Days of Significance and the ways the City acknowledges them will continued to be reviewed annually and brought to the City Council for approval. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve 2024 Calendar of Meeting and Religious Observance Dates Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the 2024 calendar of meetings for the City Council, Commissions, and days of religious observance. INTRODUCTION: Attached is the City Council and Commissions 2024 meeting calendar and religious observance dates. City Council's regular and work session meetings are held the first and third Tuesday of each month. Please note the following City Council meeting date exceptions: 1. Wednesday, Mar. 6 2. Only one meeting in July 3. Wednesday, Aug. 7 4. Wednesday, Nov. 6 5. Monday, Dec. 9 (additional meeting for 2024 Street Reconstruction projects public hearing) The color key at the top of the calendar indicates the types of meetings including religious observance days when public meetings will not be scheduled, or after 6 p.m. on Election Day. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority will adopt its 2024 calendar of meeting dates separately. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2024 Meeting Calendar JANUARY Jan. 1 New Year’s Day Jan. 2 City Council Jan. 8 Community Health Commission Jan. 9 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Jan. 10 Planning Commission Jan. 11 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Jan. 15 Martin Luther King Jr. Day Jan. 16 City Council Jan. 18 Transportation Commission Jan. 23 Human Rights & Relations Commission Jan. 24 Planning Commission Jan. 25 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority FEBRUARY Feb. 6 City Council Feb. 8 Energy & Environment Commission Feb. 12 Community Health Commission Feb. 13 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Feb. 14 Planning Commission Feb. 15 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission Feb. 19 Presidents’ Day Feb. 20 City Council Feb. 22 Arts & Culture Commission Feb. 27 Human Rights & Relations Commission Feb. 28 Planning Commission MARCH March 5 Election Day (Presidential Nomination Primary) March 6 City Council March 11 Community Health Commission March 12 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission March 13 Planning Commission March 14 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority March 19 City Council March 26 Human Rights & Relations Commission March 27 Planning Commission March 28 Arts & Culture Commission Transportation Commission March 29 Good Friday (Christian) Transportation Commission APRIL April 2 City Council April 3 Board of Appeal and Equalization April 8 Community Health Commission April 9 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission April 9-10 Eid al Fitr (Muslim) April 11 Energy & Environment Commission Planning Commission April 16 City Council April 17 Board of Appeal and Equalization April 18 Transportation Commission April 22-24 Passover (Jewish) April 25 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority MAY May 1 Human Rights & Relations Commission May 7 City Council May 9 Energy & Environment Commission May 8 Planning Commission May 16 Transportation Commission May 14 Election Day (Special Hennepin County Commissioner) May 13 Community Health Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission May 21 City Council May 16 Housing & Redevelopment Authority May 28 Human Rights & Relations Commission May 22 Planning Commission May 23 Arts & Culture Commission May 27 Memorial Day JUNE June 4 City Council June 10 Community Health Commission June 11 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission June 12 Planning Commission June 13 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority June 17 Eid al-Adha (Muslim) June 18 City Council June 19 Juneteenth June 20 Transportation Commission June 27 Arts & Culture Commission June 25 Human Rights & Relations Commission June 26 Planning Commission 2024 Meeting Calendar Religious Observance*Holiday City Council or Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Board or Commission Meeting(s) Election Day** Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 16 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 13 * No public meetings held. **No public meetings after 6 p.m. Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 14 29 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 11 25 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 15 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 9 25 2024 Meeting Calendar Religious Observance*Holiday City Council or Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Board or Commission Meeting(s) Election Day** * No public meetings held. **No public meetings after 6 p.m. JULY July 4 Independence Day July 8 Community Health Commission July 9 Heritage Preservation Commission July 10 Planning Commission July 11 Energy & Environment Commission July 16 City Council July 18 Transportation Commission July 23 Human Rights & Relations Commission July 24 Planning Commission July 25 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority AUGUST Aug. 6 Night to Unite Aug. 7 City Council Aug. 8 Energy & Environment Commission Aug. 12 Community Health Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Aug. 13 Election Day (State Primary) Aug. 14 Planning Commission Aug. 15 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission Aug. 20 City Council Aug. 22 Arts & Culture Commission Aug. 27 Human Rights & Relations Commission Aug. 28 Planning Commission SEPTEMBER Sept. 2 Labor Day Sept. 3 City Council Sept. 9 Community Health Commission Sept. 10 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Sept. 12 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Energy & Environment Commission Planning Commission Sept. 17 City Council Sept. 19 Transportation Commission Sept. 24 Human Rights & Relations Commission Sept. 25 Planning Commission Sept. 26 Arts & Culture Commission OCTOBER Oct. 1 City Council Oct. 2-4 Rosh Hashanah (Jewish) Oct. 8 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Oct. 10 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Oct. 11-12 Yom Kippur (Jewish) Oct. 14 Community Health Commission Oct. 15 City Council Oct. 16 Planning Commission Oct. 22 Human Rights & Relations Commission Oct. 24 Arts & Culture Commission Transportation Commission Oct. 30 Planning Commission NOVEMBER Nov. 1 Diwali (Hindu) Nov. 4 Heritage Preservation Commission Nov. 5 Election Day (General) Nov. 6 City Council Nov. 11 Veterans Day Nov. 13 Parks & Recreation Commission Planning Commission Nov. 14 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Nov. 18 Community Health Commission Nov. 19 City Council Human Rights & Relations Commission Nov. 21 Arts & Culture Commission Transportation Commission Nov. 28 Thanksgiving Nov. 29 Day after Thanksgiving DECEMBER Dec. 3 City Council Human Rights & Relations Commission Dec. 9 City Council Community Health Commission Dec. 10 Parks & Recreation Commission Dec. 11 Planning Commission Dec. 12 Energy & Environment Commission Dec. 17 City Council Heritage Preservation Commission Dec. 19 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission Dec. 24 Christmas Eve (Christian) Dec. 25 Christmas (Christian) Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 25 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 15 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 14 19 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 9 3 17 19 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 12 Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Summary Publication for Ordinance No. 2023-18: Concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Summary Publication for Ordinance No. 2023-18 an interim ordinance concerning Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction. INTRODUCTION: State Statute requires that the City publish all approved ordinances within 45 days of approval in its official newspaper. State Statute allows cities to choose to publish a summary of a complete public notice. This is a cost effective option for lengthy ordinances. ATTACHMENTS: Description Summary Publication of Ordinance 2023-18: Merchant Carryout Bag Reduction CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 2023-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING MERCHANT CARRYOUT BAG REDUCTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on October 17, 2023, Ordinance No. 2023-18 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 2023-18, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication and approved by the City Council as authorized by state law. An ordinance establishing a Merchant Carryout Bag Fee. This action will amend Chapter 20 of City Code to add a $0.05 fee to all merchant carryout bags distributed in Edina, with limited exceptions. Carryout bags distributed by the merchant at point of sale made of any material is subject to the fee. The fee would take effect July 1, 2024. The complete ordinance is available by contacting Sharon Allison at sallison@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0408. APPROVED for summary publication by the City Council this 21st day of November 2023. By order of the Edina City Council. Sharon Allison City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current Send one affidavit of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: November 25, 2023 as Small Business Saturday in Edina Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Proclamation naming Saturday November 26, 2023, as Small Business Saturday in Edina. INTRODUCTION: This Proclamation recognizes the importance of small businesses located in Edina and proclaims the Saturday after Thanksgiving to be Small Business Saturday in Edina. Staff recommends approval of this Proclamation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: Nov. 25, 2023 as Small Business Saturday in Edina PROCLAMATION SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY NOVEMBER 25, 2023 WHEREAS, there are more than 2,400 businesses located in the City of Edina and according to the United States Census, over 96% of all firms with paid employees in Hennepin County have fewer than 100 employees and are classified as small businesses; and WHEREAS, small businesses are located in each of Edina’s commercial districts including: 44th & France, 50th & France, 70th & Cahill, Cahill Business/Industrial Park; Grandview, Lincoln Drive, Southdale and Greater Southdale, Pentagon Park, Washington Avenue and Wooddale/Valleyview; and WHEREAS, according to the United States Small Business Administration (SBA), small businesses account for two- thirds of the nation’s employment growth; and WHEREAS, 79% of consumers surveyed in the 2021 Consumer Insights Survey understand the importance of supporting small businesses located in the community; and WHEREAS, for many local residents the Thanksgiving holiday kicks off a season of gathering, dining, shopping, and experiencing arts and culture, and consumers know that supporting small, independently-owned businesses have positive social, economic, and environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the SBA as well as other public and private organizations across the county have recognized and promoted the Saturday after Thanksgiving as Small Business Saturday; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina celebrates our local small businesses and recognizes the vital contributions these businesses make to the local economy and to the overall health and vibrancy of the community. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council does hereby proclaim, November 25, 2023, as SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY in the City of Edina and urges the residents and guests of our community to support small businesses and merchants located in each of Edina’s commercial districts on this day and throughout the year. Dated this 21st day of November 2023. _____________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2023-85: Vacating Transit Easement at 3501 Galleria Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-85 Vacating Transit Easement at 3501 Galleria. INTRODUCTION: An application was received on October 25, 2023, from 70th Street Properties, LLC to vacate and reestablish transit easements located between 69th and 70th Streets. Staff supports the vacation contingent on the property owner reestablishing the easement slightly east. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-85: Vacating Transit Easement at 3501 Galleria Vacating Transit Easement Presentation Right of Way Vacation Application Certificate of Mailing RESOLUTION NO. 2023-85 VACATING TRANSIT EASEMENT 3501 GALLERIA WHEREAS, an application was received on October 25, 2023, from 70th Street Properties of 3501 Galleria, requesting that a partial transit easement be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on November 21, 2023, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made contingent upon a new transit easement being established; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the partial transit easement vacation area is not needed for public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described transit easement is hereby vacated contingent on the property owner establishing a new transit easement: All those parts of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366 and Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1171, Hennepin County Minnesota; described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the southerly line of said Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North 14 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 18.40 feet; thence northerly and northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the west and southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 9.19 feet; thence northwesterly and northerly along a reverse curve concave to the northeast and east having a radius of 29.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 17.76 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West, tangent to said reverse curve, 215.06 feet to the northerly line of said Tract B; thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds East, along said northerly line, 24.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 215.95 feet; thence South 21 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East 22.08 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 15.76 feet; thence North 81 degrees 47 minutes 08 seconds West 24.27 feet to the point of beginning. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to affect the transfer of this property. Adopted this 21st day of November, 2023 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 2023. _______________________________ City Clerk EdinaMN.gov Vacation of Transit Easement Contingent of New Easements Galleria 69th to 70th Resolution No. 2023-85 Public Hearing November 21, 2023 Existing Easements Existing Easements Proposed Transit Easement Planning Commission Variance Utilities •City: No Issues but Contingent on New Easements •Private Utilities: No Issues Summary Staff solicited public input on BetterTogetherEdina. No public comments were submitted. Staff recommends vacating the requested transit easement contingent on a new transit easement and the Council approve Resolution No. 2023-85. Partial Transit Easement Vacation Description October 20, 2023 All those parts of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366 and Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1171, Hennepin County Minnesota; described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the southerly line of said Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North 14 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 18.40 feet; thence northerly and northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the west and southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 9.19 feet; thence northwesterly and northerly along a reverse curve concave to the northeast and east having a radius of 29.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 17.76 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West, tangent to said reverse curve, 215.06 feet to the northerly line of said Tract B; thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds East, along said northerly line, 24.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 215.95 feet; thence South 21 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East 22.08 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 15.76 feet; thence North 81 degrees 47 minutes 08 seconds West 24.27 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Transit Easement Description October 20, 2023 A 24.00 foot wide strip of land of that part of Tracts B & C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1796, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying to the right of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the southerly line of said Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North 14 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East 36.13 feet; thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 06 seconds West 214.17 feet to the northerly line of said Tract C and said line there terminating. SCALE IN FEET040NW:\2014\14565G\CADD DATA\SURVEY\S14565G-EXH Transit Esmt Vacation OUCKSLLoucks Project No. 14565GLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Max L. Stanislowski - PLS4898810/20/23EXHIBITPartial Transit Easement Vacation DescriptionOctober 20, 2023All those parts of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366and Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1171, HennepinCounty Minnesota; described as follows:Commencing at the southwest corner of said Tract B,REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366; thence North 89degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, alongthe southerly line of said Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North14 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thencenortherly along a tangential curve, concave to the west, havinga radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 00minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to the point of beginningof the land to be described; thence continue North 00 degrees17 minutes 33 seconds West 18.40 feet; thence northerly andnorthwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the west andsouthwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 9.19 feet; thencenorthwesterly and northerly along a reverse curve concave tothe northeast and east having a radius of 29.00 feet and acentral angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 17.76 feet;thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West,tangent to said reverse curve, 215.06 feet to the northerly lineof said Tract B; thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 54seconds East, along said northerly line, 24.00 feet; thenceSouth 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 215.95 feet;thence South 21 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East 22.08feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East15.76 feet; thence North 81 degrees 47 minutes 08 secondsWest 24.27 feet to the point of beginning.Denotes Easement Area5955 +/- Sq. Ft. SCALE IN FEET040NW:\2014\14565G\CADD DATA\SURVEY\S14565G-EXH Proposed Transit Esmt OUCKSLLoucks Project No. 14565GLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Max L. Stanislowski - PLS4898810/20/23EXHIBITProposed Transit Easement DescriptionOctober 20, 2023A 24.00 foot wide strip of land of that part of Tracts B & C,REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1796, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying to the right of the following described line:Commencing at the southwest corner of Tract B,REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366, Hennepin County,Minnesota; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 00seconds East, assumed bearing, along the southerly line ofsaid Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North 14degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thencenortherly along a tangential curve, concave to the west,having a radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to thepoint of beginning of said line to be described; thenceNorth 16 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East 36.13 feet;thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 06 seconds West214.17 feet to the northerly line of said Tract C and saidline there terminating.Denotes Easement Area6094 +/- Sq. Ft. Ilison, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates November 1, 2023, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Vacation of Transit Easement, Galleria (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 20 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 1st day of November, 2023. Notice of Public Hearing Galleria Transit Easement Vacation November 1, 2023 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Further Information: City of Edina Engineering 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 952-826-0371 An application was received on October 25, from 70th Street Properties, LLC, requesting that a transit easement be vacated at Galleria between 69th and 70th St and a new one would be established. Legal Description of Transit Easement Vacation: All those parts of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366 and Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1171, Hennepin County Minnesota; described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the southerly line of said Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North 14 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve, concave to the west, having a radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 18.40 feet; thence northerly and northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the west and southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 9.19 feet; thence northwesterly and northerly along a reverse curve concave to the northeast and east having a radius of 29.00 feet and a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 17.76 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West, tangent to said reverse curve, 215.06 feet to the northerly line of said Tract B; thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds East, along said northerly line, 24.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 215.95 feet; thence South 21 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East 22.08 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 15.76 feet; thence North 81 degrees 47 minutes 08 seconds West 24.27 feet to the point of beginning. Provide Public Input Share your thoughts! Public input can be provided in a variety of methods to City Council. All comments are reviewed and considered; therefore, you do not need to participate in more than one method. Public Input Options: 1 – Provide public input online at BetterTogetherEdina.org/Public-Hearings. (Available now) 2 – Leave a voicemail with your public input at 952-826-0377. Staff will submit the transcribed voicemail to Better Together Edina. (Available now) *More information on back Notice of Public Hearing Galleria Transit Easement Vacation English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices 3 – A public hearing will take place in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St., 7 p.m. Tuesday, November 21. Attend the meeting in person or watch the meeting live from home on Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16), Facebook.com/EdinaMN or EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings. Call in to provide live testimony at 786-496-5601. Call-in Conference PINs are provided in the meeting agenda which can be found at EdinaMN.gov/Agendas. City Council will make a decision at its meeting 7 p.m. Tuesday, November 21. SCALE IN FEET040NW:\2014\14565G\CADD DATA\SURVEY\S14565G-EXH Transit Esmt Vacation OUCKSLLoucks Project No. 14565GLicense No. DateI hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.Max L. Stanislowski - PLS4898810/20/23EXHIBITPartial Transit Easement Vacation DescriptionOctober 20, 2023All those parts of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366and Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1171, HennepinCounty Minnesota; described as follows:Commencing at the southwest corner of said Tract B,REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1366; thence North 89degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, alongthe southerly line of said Tract B, 596.06 feet; thence North 00degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West 23.72 feet; thence North14 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East 98.53 feet; thencenortherly along a tangential curve, concave to the west, havinga radius of 43.64 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 00minutes 00 seconds, 11.42 feet; thence North 00 degrees 17minutes 33 seconds West 174.35 feet to the point of beginningof the land to be described; thence continue North 00 degrees17 minutes 33 seconds West 18.40 feet; thence northerly andnorthwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the west andsouthwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 9.19 feet; thencenorthwesterly and northerly along a reverse curve concave tothe northeast and east having a radius of 29.00 feet and acentral angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds, 17.76 feet;thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds West,tangent to said reverse curve, 215.06 feet to the northerly lineof said Tract B; thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 54seconds East, along said northerly line, 24.00 feet; thenceSouth 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East 215.95 feet;thence South 21 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East 22.08feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 33 seconds East15.76 feet; thence North 81 degrees 47 minutes 08 secondsWest 24.27 feet to the point of beginning.Denotes Easement Area5955 +/- Sq. Ft. Owner Address City State Zip Galleria Hotel LLC 3201 Galleria Edina MN 55435 70th Street Properties 3033 Excelsior Blvd, #340 Minneapolis MN 55416 Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-87: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2023-87 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2023-87: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2023-87 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation Mark and Jackie Nolan $10,000.00 Three benches at Bredesen Park Dated: November 21, 2023 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2023. City Clerk Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2023-80: 4917 Eden Avenue, Maison Green, Sign Variance Appeal Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2023-80, upholding the P lanning Commission decision for approval of the Variance. (A denial resolution option is included in the Council packet). INTRODUCTION: The applicant, Bjorn Bowman, is requesting a sign variance for an additional 39.9 square foot wall sign on the south elevation of 4917 Eden Avenue, Maison Green. The subject property, 4917 Eden Avenue, is located on the east side of Highway 100, south of Eden Avenue and west of Wilson Road. The subject property is currently under construction. T he Maison Green building is a seven-story apartment building with a restaurant on the first floor. The site is zoned PUD-21. Signs in the PUD-21 zoning are regulated by the PCD-1, Planned Commercial District, for the commercial use, and PRD, Planned Residential District, for the residential use. The allowed residential signage under the P RD zoning is one wall sign with a maximum size of 12 square feet. The applicant is requesting to add an additional wall sign on the south side of the building that is 39.9 square feet. The applicant is asking for one variance, a variance to allow the additional wall sign for the residential portion of the building on the south elevation. The Planning Commission approved the Variance. Edina resident, Tom Tessman appealed the Planning Commission decision to the City Council. Resolutions approving and denying the requested Variance have been included in the City Council packet for consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report 9-27-23 Applicant Submittal Appeal to City Council - Tom Tessman Planning Commission Minutes 9-27-23 Site Location Map Site Photos Resolution No. 2023-80 (Approval) Resolution No. 2023-80 (Denial) 4917 Eden Ave Maison Green Presentation Appellent Power Point Presentation from the Nov. 8 City Council meeting Better Together Public Input Report The applicant, Bjorn Bowman, is requesting a sign variance for an additional 39.9 square foot wall sign on the south elevation of 4917 Eden Avenue, Maison Green. The subject property, 4917 Eden Avenue, is located on the east side of HWY 100, south of Eden Avenue and west of Wilson Road. The subject property is currently under construction. The Maison Green building is a seven-story apartment building with a restaurant on the first floor. The site is zoned PUD-21. Signs in the PUD-21 zoning are regulated by the PCD-1, Planned Commercial District, for the commercial use, and PRD, Planned Residential District, for the residential use. The allowed residential signage under the PRD zoning is one wall sign with a maximum size of 12 square feet. The applicant is requesting to add an additional wall sign on the south side of the building that is 39.9 square feet. The applicant is asking for one variance, a variance to allow the additional wall sign for the residential portion of the building on the south elevation. The rest of the proposed signage meets all other requirements of the city’s sign ordinance. The restaurant space will be allowed signage per the PCD-1 sign code allowances. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Grange Hall/Park; zoned R-1, Single-dwelling Unit District, and guided Mixed-Use Center. Easterly: Edina County Club; zoned R-1, Single-dwelling Unit District and public/semi-public. Southerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District, and guided Mixed-Use Center. Westerly: Highway 100. September 27, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-23-16, Sign variance for wall sign at 4917 Eden Avenue, Maison Green Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property, 4917 Eden Avenue, is 2.08 acres and is the site of a 7-story apartment building with a first-floor restaurant that is currently under construction. This site was formerly the site of the Perkins restaurant and an office building. Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Center Zoning: PUD-21, Planned Unit Development Compliance Table Signs in PUD-21 *Requires a variance The future restaurant/commercial space is allowed signage per the PCD,1 zoning district. PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The proposed variance will: Sign Standards- PUD-21 Proposed Sign Residential Use Signage (PRD) One sign per building- 12 square feet, maximum height of 6 feet for freestanding sign One 8.9 sf projecting sign on northeast corner of the building -and- One 39.9 sf wall sign on south elevation of building* STAFF REPORT Page 3 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. For the variance to be granted, the applicant must satisfy the statutory three-factor test for “practical difficulties.” The three-factor test includes reasonableness, uniqueness, and essential character. The subject property is zoned PUD and allows for signage that is permitted in the PRD district. Staff believes the request is reasonable given the site’s location on a freeway (Highway 100). The proposed signage facing the freeway would enable people coming to visit to see the apartments before reaching the off ramp from the freeway while traveling at high speeds. Without the signage the building might not be recognized as the destination. One building sign that is 12 square feet does not fit the size and scale of the building given the site location and the height of the building. The previous building on the site, Perkins, was a commercial business and the sign code would have allowed one sign on each building elevation (4 signs) that are up to 15% of the area of the wall the sign is located on. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The property is unique in the fact that there are street frontages on three sides of the lot and one of the street frontages is Highway 100. The additional sign proposed by the applicant will help vehicles traveling on Highway 100 locate the residential building. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The Grandview District has buildings with signage of similar scales. Optional Actions A case could be made for approval and denial of this project. Below provides options for the planning commission to consider: Approval Approve the request for an additional 39.9 square foot building sign on the south elevation of 4917 Eden Avenue. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the building on a freeway (Highway 100). 2. The request is reasonable as it would help vehicles traveling at high speed on Highway 100 locate the residential building. Without the signage the building might not be recognized as the destination. 3. The proposed sign is reasonable given the size and scale of the building and the number of street frontages. 4. There are circumstances that are unique to the subject property. Those unique circumstances include the elevation change from Highway 100. 5. The proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are other signs in the Grandview District that are similar and located on similarly sized buildings. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to plans and survey date stamped August 24, 2023. Denial Deny the variance request for an additional 39.9 square foot building sign at 4917 Eden Avenue. Denial is based on the following findings. 1. The proposal does not meet all the standards to grant a variance. 2. The tenant could install a single 12 square foot sign on one side of the building and meet the city’s sign code. 3. There is not a practical difficulty justifying a new sign. The building is allowed signage under the current code provisions. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the sign variance request. Staff believes the proposed sign meets the variance criteria and is reasonable given the practical difficulty. Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. Maison Green, located at 4917 Eden Ave, is zoned as a PUD. The PUD allows for signage per the Planned Residential District in the Code for residential uses. The sign code for residential districts allows for one building sign at the maximum size of 12 square feet. Maison Green is a 7 story, 196-unit apartment building that is taking the place of the former Perkins Restaurant. One building sign at 12 square feet does not allow for the proper identification of this building and is not a practical size for the size and scope of this building, its location, and its height. To relieve the difficulty of the zoning ordinance and provide a building sign that is reasonable for the property's use, we are proposing one illuminated building sign to read Maison Green, located on the 6th floor on the west elevation. The sign will be 34" high x 169" length (39.9sqft). Please see the scaled rendering for location and design. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The current, prohibitive residential sign code for Maison Green does not align with its mixed-use development designation and does not allow for the size or location of the building sign to properly identify it. Maison Green is bordered by Hwy 100 to the west, Edina City Hall, and the on/off ramps to Hwy 100 to the North, a golf course to the east, and an office building to the south. Because of its unique location in relation to Hwy 100, (3 of the 4 sides of the building directly or indirectly face highway 100) the proposed building sign would allow the building to be properly identified and correct the extraordinary circumstance applicable to this property. The property, is not in a residential neighbprIto4NA and it should not be subjected to the restrictions of the residential sign code. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. AUG 2 4 2023 Maison Green will be a mixed-use development and per the mixed-use land JtoeLANNING DEPARTMENT description: "Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites." We have designed a sign that will allow for the practical identification of the building while also being in harmony with the primary uses and intent of a PUD zoned property. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood The proposed building sign for Maison Green will be located on the south elevation and face Hwy 100. The sign will not be visible from any residential neighborhood areas and will only be seen by oncoming traffic going North on Hwy 100. The sign will in no way alter the essential character of any part of the neighborhood. The sign is designed using Maison Green's branded font and colors and will be integral to the design intent and character of the building and its architectural elements. CITY OF EDINA AUG 24 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAISON GREEN 4917 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MN 55424 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE SHOP DRAWINGS PROJECT NUMBER - 64173 06/27/23 - SUBMITTAL 1 08/08/23 - SUBMITTAL 2 08/16/23 - SUBMITTAL 3 ® SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North I Minneapolis, MN 55427 I 763.277.7774 Sign Type: E101-1 Wall Sign CS Qty = 1 BLOCKING IN WALL, LOW VOLTAGE WIRE TO SIGN LOCATION, ACCESS TO REMOTE POWER SUPPLY BY GC (Dashed Blue lines) • (4) 5' x 16' Cut out access holes for Z-Clip mounting. 33 3/4" Version Information Ve Pee Dewy,. By RI RUMS SJor.11•11-OrigInal Dm, JC RI OR/1421 Irk Upcble SC Customer Approval X um. en. C.^ brojrg k..4-our toutcheers ...dr-gnat Rcoamel, cer,fnaittioJoIpat Me/ to color no,. pa, wee. ed naer ,up, 1,Rx. ekvn obylde losened 11,1 Inp.1.61,ed cRnur yepart31, • SRJISystvon n • IIRet pJgrandes4.4,1 for Lcar,en kn,.nto Le RIRmi. up. Ruls,te $4, • ror to be rrp.ci,ed, aped or ekIllitrd'r J-ry Shipping Information SHIP DATE_/-1._ INITIALS PACKAGE TRACIONG Notes • 6" deep SignComp Hinged Flex Face Aluminum Sign cabinet with Bleed Face (42021 Narrow Single Face body extrusion with 42085 Tension frame and # 2095 Bleed Tension Frame cover) • Cabinet & returns painted to match dark blue PMS 296C • Cabinet internally illuminated with Bitro Optics Pro Plus 6500K Bright White LED's. • Mounted to wall blocking with galvanized wood lag bolts. — • UL approved 3M Panagraphics III fabric flex face with Opaque Dark Blue PMS 296C and White Illuminated copy and Border. 6"—I 1earfg.ds-N-N-N"J'isjNi Bottom Right Corner of Sign 120V - 20 amp 2 power supplies .92 total amps/ .46 amps per power supply (See Page 12) CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 4 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMEN 4. 5" 5/8" INTERIOR SHEATHING (GYPSUM BOAD) - EXTRA LAYER GYPSUM BOARD @ 2 HR FIRE CONDITIONS BATT INSULATION VAPOR RETARDER MASONRY VENEER (BRICK, STONE, OR CMU) W/ MASONRY TIES - REFER TO ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE AIR AND WATER BAR 5/8" TYPE GYP BD SHEATHING (FLAMEBLOCK @ RATED WALLS) OOD STUD BACK UP WALL FIRE RETARDANT TREATED) INTERIOR EXTERIOR 169" MAISON GREEN < BW > MASONRY VENEER W/ WOOD STUD BACK-UP PLAN DIMS HERE (FOSH) 18 1/2" SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Project FRANA CONSTRUCTION Maison Green Exterior Signage 64173 Sign Type Drawing it C21120 Rev. 1 - 08/14/23 Scale 3/4" = 1' (1:16) Product Ver/Date Sign Type: E101-1 Wall Sign Sign Comp Construction 1 2 1 3 2 4 PARTS UST NOTE: FRAME BRACING GUIDELINES APPLY ITEM PART# DESCRIPTION FOR BOTH THE BLEED AND FRAMED COVERS. 1 2021 Narrow Single Face Body 2 5321 Narrow Body Corner Angle 3 Aluminum Back 4 Aluminum Back Support - Frame Suport Tube #2175 5 2086 Tension Frame II 6 Rivet 7 5210 Corner Key NOTE: THE NARROW SINGLE FACE BODY 8 5305 Frame Corner Angle IS DESIGNED FOR LED APPLICATION. 9 5352 Small Frame Brace 10 2095 Bleed Tension Frame Cover 11 2177 Small Frame Support Tube - 1" BODY CORNER ANGLE SCREW PART# 5218 HINGE SCREW PART# 5170 (1 EVERY 36" O.C. ACROSS TOP ONLY) JOINER BRACKET SLOT TENSION CLIP PART# 5360 DETAIL A NOTE: PRE-CUT KITS ARE NOT PRE-DRILLED. (Holes shown in this drawing are for reference only. Drilling of pilot holes are to be done by fabricator.) THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED AT 110 CHARGE TO ASSIST YOU IN VISLIAUDIIG OUR PROPOSAL. THE DRAWING HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF SIG? COMP. PERMISSION TO COPY OR REVSE TRIS DRAWING OR TO USE THIS DRAWING FOR PRODUCTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND CAN ONLY BE COPIED. REVISED OR USED FOR PRODUCTION WITH THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SIGNCOMP. DRAWING BY: SBrelhof 0.000 in TIME Centroid X: 6/11/2014 SignComp A Centroid Y: 0.000 in Narrow Single Face Body w/ A Tension Frame II and Bleed Cover - Cross Sectional Details PART Pt0 2021-86-95 with 5352 Principal Moments Ix: 0.000 in^4 Principal Plornen Ty: 0.0001n^4 REV Section Modulus lx: 0.000 in^3 Section Modulus ly: 0.000 inA3 SHEET 1 OF 2 4 3 BRAKE FORM ALUM. OR STOCK ANGLE BACK SUPPORT 3/4" X .090 4 SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Project FRANA CONSTRUCTION Maison Green Exterior Signage Job # Sign Type Drawing # 64173 E101 C21120 Product CS Ver/Date Rev. 1 - 08/14/23 NTS Version Information DAA Doc,cr. VI 0027/23 P-hAttal I -0BAnaiDomp RI 01/1413 Hb Updsle 00 Customer Approval X IIIr. e DAN Rn el-nr,k r repnarbicnciteers &Mr, net scrurr,:, crtF,(Ad dpaPAt kW te car swArA pAI, Larry, wel.mAyiAurrpIe is mkt rylver A.141darnened On I. an bnpAlsPed ,T1I.P.IPITIPOWA/ h YI 1w1Ale.o. It A Fem W sb nm gr yo- • AA,kly }aa we,*ram b reppAyed,yepeclaryAl>00,, Shipping Information SHIP DATE_/_/_. INITIALS PACKAGE TRACKING II Notes CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 4 2023 PLANNING DEPARTM NT Sign Type: E101.1 Single Faced Flex Face Illuminated Wall Sign Section A Detail SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Product Ver/Date NTS CS Rev. 1 - 08/14/23 Project FRANA CONSTRUCTION Maison Green Exterior Signage Job # Sign Type Drawing # 64173 E101 C21120 Version Information 06/27/21 -04.1Doring lC RI 08/1423 1,600. le Customer Approval X tM cha', ism rept wt.n .1.1081•Darat. elfpin ce.d prod.. a pi, .0,.-du rrairea uorp, Dm* refutfce A1160.11tterred DA, an try./.4rd 5.,0.39,Drl..., n .D,D9D, II ED. to Le eqwDavvi ratebe ed,rp.1 ereelt.d D Shipping Information SHIP DATE_/_/_ INITIALS PACKAGE TR&OONGS Notes *Masonry Veener (Brick, Stone. Or Cmu) W/ Masonry Ties - Refer To Elevations For Type 3/4' 1112'—I 112' • (3) 60w 120-277 VAC — IP68 power supplies housed in bottom of sign. CITY OF EDINP AUG 24 2023 PLANNING DEPARTME • Toggle disconnect on side of cabinet • Conduit to Keep Spacing integrity • Conduit to back of sign by G.C. • 120v - 20 amp electric to sign by G.C. Sign Section A Detail Scale: 1 1/2" = 1' • 6' deep SignComp Hinged Flex Face Aluminum Sign cabinet with Bleed Face (82021 Narrow Single Face body extrusion with 412085 Tension frame and 44 2095 Bleed Tension Frame cover) • 5/8' Type 'X' Gyp BD Sheating (Flameblock10 Rated Walls) • 1 1/2' X 1 3/4' X 1 1/2' X 1/4' Aluminum Z-Clips. Attached to building studs with 1/4' Tek screws. • Fastners TBD Based on Blocking • All penetrations to be sealed with silicone adhesive. • UL approved 3M Panagraphics III fabric flex face with Opaque dark blue PMS 296C background and White Illuminated copy & Border. Bitro Optics Pro Plus 6500K Bright White LED's 38 7/8' Air & Watter Barrier Wood Stud Back Up Wall (Fire Retardant Treated) B FRONT VIEW 4 3 2 1 D C B A Sign Type: E101-1 Wall Sign Sign Comp Frame Construction SignComp TITLE Narrow Single Face Body w/ Tension Frame II and Bleed Cover - Cross Sectional Details PART NO 2021-86-95 with 5352 'SHEET 2 OF 2 1 B 3 NOTE: NOTCH THE BACK SUPPORT(S) AS SHOWN, TO ACCOMMODATE THE HORIZONTAL FRAME SUPPORT(S). DIMENSIONS MAY VARY PENDING ON THE SIZE OF SUPPORTS USED. DRAWING BY: sBremof 6/11/2014 THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED AT SO CHARGE TO ASSIST YOU IS VISUAUZING OUR PROPOSAL THE DRAWING HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF SIGNCOMP. PERMISSION TO COPY OR REVISE THIS DRAWING OR TO USE THIS DRAWING FOR PRODUCTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND CAN ONLY DE COPIED. REVISED OR USED FOR PRODUCTION WITH THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERSISSION CO SIGNCOMP. Centroid X: 0.000 in Centroid 0.000 in R. 23 AUG 2 4 2 Version Information D.Rnr.n.A VI 050003 SAPArtal ORATAJLA,A, OF WWII We UpJal• Customer Approval Ret ef/A, X a rypeR/Iston theory and rayml a:nor, I .ApicifAaletierdpec:At Relerlo mkt PArrh p.Av. urpV.5d ansigillutliie.ecktnittete IPRIP. Resernd .1 er, to-AAA/An! rte.. g p.FaeJ A, S9157.Irra in• 30,11,0,6-1 des., eci rxrtalebest A n nalto be sten.. p-pe AAOls 'Pr oynkason rag m a rercA,AA reped toSt.leA Shipping Information SHIP DATE_/_/_ INITIALS PACKAGE TRACKING tl Notes CITY OF ED NA PLANNING DEPARTMENT SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Project FRANA CONSTRUCTION Maison Green Exterior Signage D C B A DETAIL C 4 Alb LM1111.111= 1 it I I :: 1 NOTCH BACK SUPPORT(S) 11 0 I / NOTE: NOTCHING IS BASED ON THE USE OF SIGNCOMP #2175 FRAME SUPPORT TUBE FOR BACK SUPPORT OR A BRAKE FORMED ALUMINUM SUPPORT 2" x 3/4" x .090, AND 1" SQ TUBE FOR COMPRESSION BRACING. DETAIL D Principal Moments Ix: 0.000 In A4 Principal Moments 0.000 InA4 Section Modulus 0.000 inA3 Section Modulus Iy: 0.000 in A3 2 SECTION B-B DETAIL D (fD SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Project FRANA CONSTRUCTION Maison Green Exterior Signage Job 8 64173 Sign Type E101 Drawing 8 C21120 Product CS Ver/Date Rev. 1 - 08/14/23 Scale 3/32" = ' Version Information Ver D. Docip-. VI DY27/23 PI C1/1.3 Id* Upi. Customer Approval X Oat Dn...., ...a Fs trp...ata deem •rd I, nal aroma: 6,E1(.1 te, • el machel. Itelea cob eon' eh. pair tarp,. e.-41 of rrsivial sazrp M telerr.r.rea AI Pills 'mend 11r. anvyllJrda wr3vKa•f Ip n • OS" )va his s`..r.> • p.c,Inur rryvei.ted, cep. I c.....1,te 4, A, f Shipping Information SHIP DATE_/__/_ INITIALS— PACKAGE 1RAOONG. Notes Sign Type: E101-1 Mounting Elevation F li 1E31 1111 11111 °°'911111111111111 1,11 111 11 1111 di 1E01 nu I 11111 ;11,11 1111111 'INN 11'11111 III I Ill roil!!! WI -1111,11 11,111 '1 " '1111111 IIIIIIII 1111111 1::111! '111111111 II I !I II ,,11111 MAISON GREEN ETI NU 1 --- 111111 111 I H 111 iiimi 101 , ;Pau, /11 _ 110 II =4111N1 WI 5*--z1- _:.. i 1----“EM 1E =3-2 Iii1111111 1111 E 3 1111 11 --=-4 J c t L 46 LEL . RtZi -1,..- adi nil 11 F21 a 7; III! 11114111 :..: - -1- i. ..- .151. mr lin • Fig: 1111 ii 174 II UZI MI r-71 1E31 1E 1111 1111111111 101 ,g__3 silo so uteg,e . 1... =.; sr .%:-::-.74-; S II HIM M 1111 II MI m Pll 1E31 1E WI Mil Hill I 11111 NI III 1111 11111 1R1I ral II II 1111 1111 II E31 1E31 d En41 1E31 11 M NO II Huiiiii sill 11 mm •••• min 11.111 mu x Iii i ,,low IEEE. mum Es Fug 11111 ""imi low um HIP Mil El is NE liiiIan -5-ffm tom man re N- II 1111 No! Hill ,111111111 1111 NM I I I I III III I1 I 111 1 19 Fl Fl 1 1 I 1 I 1I I I 1 1=1 1 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 1 1=1 I I =I I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 11-1 11-1 I I-11 I I 17,1 I 17,1 I 17,1 I 17,1 I 1,„1 1 1„,1 I I men Re j IAE A=WA rzIMIELILIMAMT:11.116 MIN 1=a 4 El :Ear 1 1 1 1 I 11=1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3-3 -Z-- 1111 Eh CO 1 BM E DM 11 e. == "ELIZMir"a Wm" ra WN M Lrm%"=" MCA al Wallin FISIGMEASS lajZ ECW III III 1 1 1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 — CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 4 '023 PLANNING DEP RTMENT ME, ILTE =Intl Celdirrt, WWI ••1 221. EPA. rt dfixED BY COUUMPON /Olaf/I B KV GROUP /velitecture Inlerlor Design londscope Arcliteclure Encineering 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 MInneopols, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.15tvgoop.com CONSULTANTS PROJECT TITLE 4917 EDEN AVE tt•SC•LlTr 42•1•03.11{Er CERTIFICATION pion.sper,caton et yr prom. by no or L.-Ger rry xi wpwrioNG sod NEI run arLoy Liceored OciessOWAK/Gao oWer0e Vol of So ellrer00 timed • Hoe. 0•I0 SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER A010 DITE RAN GFIONAL WITT N SEEM MAIIC,Mt•TE MOM* tr111.3,....••m3 DM. t MUM:WM 00.13 fORFLAKINGI • StSterVaf 1 IEF 11..11..1.1.4 01,01 anTtrALO.1.11. FOR WE WV Warn.. .11.1.44.11.•1011421t Ple NM NO WW1. • FF k 2 I 1 5 SIIEPANIRTIDILS EDEN AVE BELOW GRADE WATER RETENTION SIGN LOCATION BETON GRADE — WATER 00100)00 CITY OF EDINA E105 EU LRE OUTBOOR SPACE 1211 DOT WD) OPEN MI DOT IMO EASING RETAWING WNL WILLSON RD ALIERNME MADWOMEN JEANNE.° PACES•21.111/RE ORKWAY AUG 2 4 2023 IlltEMO•111 MORIN 02021 BKV Group PARTMENT CaLLmi Gaztu=z4=1 IMI=1 M=I 0.2021 21.10:3 00E CFE.0..0 C[0.10051,0101.n.60, 1 `,1.•,f,..,, our MO •,,,,,,,,,, ..„.0 ,,,,,,, LIC1ir M. ...a . 1.1.0•44 ...., p.s.0.....00.,......,.0 trams • srnxrtm • 4ustcog. o Pi rgcz ./ r{y . • ' '' • 1. .. ., : . .":.,•__-'- ......- - li OW ::::::: I ..,•_:--- --_..,-.^.---A,::: 6, r.,.6..mt • 61.0.6. Our lou 16.1.0611, , W.V. V.6.11. ..- G. MN /.. '''''.. . X 't' „filiptar - - ... . r .1,6 ..0:411-1-1 411 •,•.7. i / , I i / ' :7- . '6,.....- •166.7.161, .1116, . MOM, I ' 0[110.10(.. 111.6.11 66- .r.......... .111111111111 /WA( VG 10.0.0,01 t• p. • '',-;, ,,,. FE,./;;J.'''.,', - :: , :: - ::: -4$ .3. . ...... it '‘" "1,..,, .,...f ........ , Fp,. VI, ticor 'car .......... lielatitha" •• • kt,D, ..'' . .. MOM. .r..c.r••••, ......._ ,,,,,,,,,i1Z---- F.I0CRIII. nrc. lox ...T.'. NIL 171.....6 1.1.00NI 0... .• IX. ,GM AVMS ,,• ea . ... ....... Nal. • ea..:•11. . Eden Avenue , ......... i I / , ll,,,,,l,:-.., 11.Ce.. \ ... , i , ,..• ••••.jk' ,ko Ira le VATittl'&•'• T R /1/C / .... .vgi N. -142---., , •-16 ' 1 , , y wic, 0. • . liarreat ../1,.../..... , / / vin.mor,os •• //,..,.• , /' /,•1 /01 T Ai / v.••-• 1....... '• / / osur tc:It / 1 - I i'' MI - 4.... /..../..., 7 or J 4g106 116.10.1 MM.,. ‘cmor 0 ' .0 / i ,,,„ / N11.0•0011,6•466ffr / I ; / , ' 1666•Ost M... •1:._r'''• f ....1.• .• ‘1.1oirT . 0, , 1 -......to 11 oce.I.. 16.1..6 ..}..16.1 , I I( ACt i a cu.., 1,0 \ W.IR 66.1•1 \ ' 'LL''.7",!a... - - I, ... ' 0- .. 1 . C f . \\1 , ..1.Cr[01.1111 LC.' UM 'UM --' -..' ,6,•„‘ • \ 1 1 1‘ I 1 1 q‘li It , I r 1,1 1 • I 1 i I 1 11,-''''''' _.,,' .-->.-- ,.41 \ \ ' \ ,, -IT 11 7. 1Iv S leonat toot „•„.., „,n / , I I I I I t N / '1‘ 1 I... ..., 0 \ ) . • ',..• 1 , .... I T • ._...... , ( \ I i. • '4 •/, I e- I i I ;\, - ,'', i 1 y ‘t I ..-- t tl' -4 .. \ '' i l'i • I . 1 1i r 1 I I I I \ I II I IL k 1, t \ ‘ i 61/ 1 16 W 1 I I II 1 11 1 I 6, I 1•• 'I '', '''' ":" 'it- .. ".. .- Agri' 0 20 4 o 111119 SCALE IN FEET A'rrri. 'Al •m.o.,. • , .. , k, t I, I 1 1 4 , E 1 : 4 ' \ ,~i 11iii/ ; 1 \'1 \ tujnfrii., -:-• , _ _ _ itoTtCr 0.1.16. • 1.01001. WM. 4 11.0.4 \t .1......t u„,,,,,T,,,,,, .......\ ....'.1'...04:0,6 D. raL, 1611.100.000,,NOR ' . \ 5 04',10 Illd TO. CAME, \ Kr A.0.111 IF 1001111.? , \ • , ''' 1 ' * .'" lrat- \ ,_ - ..--- liar MU MOS( 6 : \ \ 1 ..• \ I, 1 1 , \ \ 1 4.4„,/ir ! 1 1 .66 , \ \6e.........'11.6.1“ 1 0 \ I f , ' t : I I 1, X I I ' I 1.... ' Ft••• C0.14,171 I ri " / ‘• 4' r 6,..q I., •ra P i i i. , i 1 f i \k 1411)/, 66 ./ i I ,1 rd.r.trAT ... - / \ AID, \ <- --- -,.- - U0.0110lE -1.q1,1•1‘ ' i r, ,-,, Ti-- ../ 6COGRIVIVI W/04.1, -•-.,, ...•. 'FIX' I 1 /../ ' DEMOLITION NOTE DEMOLITION LEGENDS 00 t.......= 001.010,ORP-01.11100,4 /01001111.00-KII [WING IMAM ORM ' • I I MAC. 06/1/401.10,0101.15 AS HMV.. CONIWTOR TO 00000.10.TE AC111.00 01011.01.001. MING n o .-- era ..., a CO.V.0.1..COOREKTOS TO..141ff MO,/ 11QOASVarrtre.11110,1 ...- CIOU.T.16. .1CDr..•;d1LrirA''''''''''''''''''''' ••••••••.•••••••• ••••••••••••••••• AIT 57....621=5. tic ...a • 1 Ca. M. Me/...13 VIMOVE All ITIES,IGITATION MO Sin 0040 v A 103,f 0160..4010 R. GS 111301.10 C.I...00..70.5011. 5001 .0 00011‘1000.501ANDAll 00.1. '° le MG.. 0,010 00.1.1. et RAMO 0001.10115010000 ..11. MONO ...MFR. /401.0.1-5 SH41. N int.A110 PER ITC IC, l• • ...... in 0100,00-01...0.01.1001.7ba 00.51./01500.1. et 00.1100111V r::::::::::1 AMOIV.0.7.... M.O. lnIff5 • van• ••••••• 5. TIISTO...V7SKALUTDON 01,0"0010110 ...Tin 10.4.01100001.. OAP .. 01,11t. ,...,......, ter 1.11.141e.,10 .M.000111.. • CONITARCS Sit. 0...04,...... WE WU. rucrunsv.rma 00.40,0 (41.0.005,C. 0 •1004 m.0.1 th1175001.030114001510000. ••••,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5 MI fol.1.66.15•55C.4761..nliWAILS.16.0....itc r.o.r. 64 : . ,..7.7.7.7 OM... ••••••60Crurt. =,..Z.,r:"...ltr." - ,,,. ....- 6 coor....,05.1IDNE 6111.661.41X11. 6.1 amovor• 60V.. , see kekto V trrio.0•014.5.013.50.155.156-0.1......., a••••• ---........ X limo, OW.. M. la. ••• -•- - 6••• •••• -11- •••••• --,- ....... _,...__ 66.6.6 -•-•- ••• • 6.... 6....... ....,.... ..,.._._ ,...‘....... „, •e6o.• .6 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SIM. BE REMO...SIM FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS°, ALL EXISTING WILMS. THES SHALL COOEIRATE 1,11}1 ALL EMMY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERV. AND / OR RELOCATION Of LINES. TELL WOK VW Oa Gopher State One Call AT"LfAsn=';',1,=,..=1.";=1== HIRES, CABLES CONDORS, PIPES MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED Tr WEZO.-il-WW STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHILL REPAIR OR REFUGE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OHNE. C 3016 B. Group, Irk. EOE B K V GROUP Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. 222 North Second Street Minneepois MN 55401 Telephone: 612-339-3752 Facsimile: 612-339-6212 vnwi.b kv g ro u p. corn EOE CONSULTANTS k LOUCKS 6.05cen APC•1.11.7.E F64,0,VEiltd. 101.03 liCACT 21.041.00 PROJECT TITLE 4917 EDEN AVE. OWNER/DEVELOPER JiTy OF EDINA AUG 24 2023 CERTIFICATION hereby certly pan, or repat was preps. by me or under my 60.6 SUpery.n •n•Ulal Irmo rkry Lkensed Prolessbnal Erxeneet Wer. tr. dvw Slate of 1.1nAesota 94941/144 A 4 J. St Achael MAUL PE 24440 1015,021 llama Nun., Oote SHEET TITLE DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET HUMBER C1-2 Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota 10/15/2021 Mike KrychLicense Number Date23555I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Architect under the laws of thestate of Minnesota 10/15/2021 Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Architect under the laws of thestate of Minnesota 10/15/2021 South Elevation Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Architect under the laws of thestate of Minnesota 10/15/2021 Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Architect under the laws of thestate of Minnesota 10/15/2021 Sign Type: E101-1 Night View Job # Sign Type Drawing # Product Ver/Date These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 FRANA CONSTRUCTION CS C21120 E101 64173 Project Version Information Customer Approval Shipping Information Notes V1 06/27/23 Submittal 1 - Original Drawing JC Maison GreenExterior Signage Scale NTS Ver Date Description By Name This drawing is a representation of colors and may not accurately depict final color of product. Refer to color swatch, paint sample, and or material sample for color reference All Rights Reserved This is an unpublished drawing prepared by Serigraphics Sign Systems Inc. in a sign program designed for your business. It is not to be shown to anyone outside your organization nor to be reproduced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. Date X SHIP DATE____/____/____INITIALS____ PACKAGE______________________________ TRACKING #______________________________ Rev. 1 - 08/14/23 R1 08/14/23 Info Update JC Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota 10/15/2021 Sign Type: E101-1 Night View Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Architect under the laws of thestate of Minnesota 10/15/2021 Job # Sign Type Drawing # Product Ver/Date These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 FRANA CONSTRUCTION CS C21120 E101 64173 Project Version Information Customer Approval Shipping Information Notes V1 06/27/23 Submittal 1 - Original Drawing JC Maison GreenExterior Signage Scale NTS Ver Date Description By Name This drawing is a representation of colors and may not accurately depict final color of product. Refer to color swatch, paint sample, and or material sample for color reference All Rights Reserved This is an unpublished drawing prepared by Serigraphics Sign Systems Inc. in a sign program designed for your business. It is not to be shown to anyone outside your organization nor to be reproduced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. Date X SHIP DATE____/____/____INITIALS____ PACKAGE______________________________ TRACKING #______________________________ Rev. 1 - 08/14/23 R1 08/14/23 Info Update JC Mike Krych License Number Date 23555 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota 10/15/2021 1 Emily Bodeker From:Tom Tessman <tatessman@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, October 6, 2023 4:34 PM To:Sharon Allison Cc:Dianne Blake; Emily Bodeker; James Hovland; Cary Teague; Tom Tessman Subject:Maison Green: Approved Signage Appeal EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, Sharon. We were unable to attend the last Planning Commission meeting, but we were surprised and disappointed to hear that the commission approved a signage variance for Maison Green (4917 Eden Ave). The request was for a second sign of 39.9 square feet from Edina's code of 12 square feet. Also, we were unaware that a commission had the authority to approve such a variance. We're appealing this approved signage variance in a neighborhood, and respectfully request that the City of Edina revisit this issue for a number of reasons, including: 1. Illumination. How many are illuminated (i.e. neon) signs do we have in residential neighborhoods now? The illumination aspect of the variance request, staff report and staff recommendation seemed to lack full transparency that this is in essence a neon sign. 2. Impact on Residential Neighborhood: Visual pollution. Neighborhood residents walking, biking, and driving along the west and east frontage roads will be able to see the illuminated sign. 3. The building is easy to identify and easy to find. A second, nonconforming, neon sign is not necessary to find this building. You can't miss the property visually‐‐ it's easily viewed from Hwy. 62. It's also near easy‐to‐find landmarks: 1) the 50th & 100 northbound & southbound exits, 2) Edina Country Club, 3) Edina City Hall. Finally, the location awareness of the "Old Perkins off of Hwy 100 & 50th" is still very high. Moreover, the first go‐to for most people is to input the address in Google maps! 4. Applicant Process: Why did this variance request come from the sign company‐‐Bjorn Bowman, the (likely commissioned) sales representative for Serigraphics and not the developer Maison Green? If this variance strategy is approved, what will stop other sign fabrication companies from seeking an Edina variance in exchange for their business? This process seems somewhat flawed. 5. Maison Green Marketing & Branding: A second sign on the south facing side will not lead to the success or failure of Maison Green's ability to effectively market this property. Social media, digital ads, print ads and other marketing tools driving potential tenants to a robust website will sell the Maison Green experience. 6. City Precedent: Is having large illuminated building signage the precedent we want for the City of Edina? A non‐ conforming sized, illuminated sign hurts the aesthetic of Edina. Maybe Kumon, Washburn‐McReavy, OLG and other new emerging developments want oversized illuminated signs. Please let us know if you have any questions and please let us know what happens next. Respectfully, 2 Tom & Dianne Tom Tessman/Dianne Blake 5017 Yvonne Terrace Edina MN 55436 612.720.5900 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: October 25, 2023 Page 1 of 3 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers September 27, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Bornstein, Miranda, Padilla, Smith, Felt, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Daye, Strauss, Olson, Hu and Schultze. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Felt moved to approve the September 27, 2023, agenda. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Community Comment None. V. Public Hearings A. Maison Green, Sign Variance – 4917 Eden Avenue Assistant Planner Bodeker presented the request of Maison Green for a sign variance. Staff recommended approval of the sign variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Bjorn Bowman, Serigraphic, addressed the Commission and answered questions. Public Hearing None. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: October 25, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Padilla moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the sign variance and felt the changes were appropriate. Full discussion can be reviewed in the official meeting video. Motion Commissioner Felt moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the sign variance for Maison Green at 4917 Eden Avenue as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Puttshack Rooftop Dining, Conditional Use Permit – 10 Southdale Center Assistant Planner Bodeker presented the request of Puttshack Rooftop Dining for a Conditional Use Permit. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Greg Drain, Puttshack, addressed the Commission and answered questions. Public Hearing Ms. Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road, addressed the Commission about her concerns regarding impacts to the neighborhood. Mr. Gil Fridell, 6566 France Avenue South, addressed the Commission regarding the outdoor dining. Commissioner Padilla moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the conditional use permit and offered comments and a decision that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. Motion Commissioner Felt moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Conditional Use Permit for Puttshack Rooftop Dining at 10 Southdale Center, as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: October 25, 2023 Page 3 of 3 VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review – 6600-6800 France Avenue Director Teague presented the request of 6600-6800 France Avenue for a sketch plan review. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Shawn Smith, Wildamere Capital Management, introduced himself and addressed the Commission. Mr. Dave Little and Mr. Aaron Mullins, HGA Architects, addressed the Commission. The Commission asked questions of the applicants, reviewed the sketch plan, and offered comments that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. VII. Chair and Member Comments Received. VIII. Staff Comments Received. IX. Adjournment Commissioner Felt moved to adjourn the September 27, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 10:27 PM. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4917 Eden Avenue © WSB & Associates 2013 September 13, 2023 0 90 18045 ft 0 25 5012.5 m 1:700 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-80 RESOLUTION UPHOLDING THE PLANNNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A SIGN VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 39.9 SQUARE FOOT SIGN ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION OF 4917 EDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Bjorn Bowman, on behalf of the property owner, Reuter Walton, is requesting variance for an additional 39.9 square foot sign on the south elevation of the Maison Green building, 4917 Eden Avenue. 1.02 Edina City Code Section 36-517 allows one wall sign with a maximum size of 12 square feet. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: TRACT A, LAND SURVEY NO. 1501, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1.04 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.354 Subdivision 12, and City Code Chapter 36 Division II Administration authorizes the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to grant variances. 1.05 On September 27, 2023 the Edina Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, held a public hearing on this application. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information. The Board considered all of the hearing testimony and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. 1.06 On September 27, 2023, the Planning Commission approved the variance. Vote 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.07 On October 6, 2023, Tom Tessman appealed the Planning Commission decision to the City Council. 1.08 On November 8, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed variance. 1.09 On November 21, 2023, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission decision for approval of the variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the building on a freeway (Highway 100). 2. The request is reasonable as it would help vehicles traveling at high speed on Highway 100 locate the residential building. Without the signage the building might not be recognized as the destination. 3. The proposed sign is reasonable given the size and scale of the building and the number of street frontages. 4. There are circumstances that are unique to the subject property. Those unique circumstances include the location on Highway 100 and the elevation change from Highway 100. 5. The proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are other signs in the Grandview District that are similar and located on similarly sized buildings. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, to uphold the Planning Commission decision to approve the variance as requested. Approval is subject to the same conditions as follows: Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to the plans and survey date stamped August 24, 2023. Dated: November 21, 2023. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2023. City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2023-80 DENYING A SIGN VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 39.9 SQUARE FOOT SIGN ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION OF 4917 EDEN AVENUE, OVERTURNING A DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Bjorn Bowman, on behalf of the property owner, Reuter Walton, is requesting a variance for an additional 39.9 square foot sign on the south elevation of the Maison Green building, 4917 Eden Avenue. 1.02 Edina City Code Section 36-517 allows one wall sign with a maximum size of 12 square feet. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: TRACT A, LAND SURVEY NO. 1501, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1.04 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.354 Subdivision 12, and City Code Chapter 36 Division II Administration authorizes the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to grant variances. 1.05 On September 27, 2023 the Edina Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, held a public hearing on this application. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information. The Board considered all of the hearing testimony and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. 1.06 On September 27, 2023, the Planning Commission approved the variance. Vote 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.07 On October 6, 2023, Tom Tessman appealed the Planning Commission decision to the City Council. 1.08 On November 8, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed variance. 1.09 On November 21, 2023, The City Council denied the variance request. RESOLUTION NO. 2023- 80 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal does not meet all the standards to grant a variance. 2. The tenant could install a single 12 square foot sign on one side of the building and meet the city’s sign code. 3. The proposal does not meet the three-factor practical difficulty test within the variance criteria to justify a new sign. The building is allowed signage under the current code provisions. The site is not unique. Additional lighted signage is not needed as the building is highly visible from Highway 100, and guests can find the building using GPS. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the requested sign variance at 4917 Eden Avenue, overturning the Planning Commission decision. Denial is based on the findings above. Dated: November 21, 2023 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2023. _________________________________ City Clerk EdinaMN.gov 4917 Eden Avenue-Maison Green Sign Variance 4917 Eden Avenue Planning Commission Action approval of the variance request based on the following findings: 1.The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the building on a freeway (Highway 100). 2.The request is reasonable as it would help vehicles traveling at high speed on Highway 100 locate the residential building. Without the signage the building might not be recognized as the destination. 3.The proposed sign is reasonable given the size and scale of the building and the number of street frontages. 4.There are circumstances that are unique to the subject property. Those unique circumstances include the elevation change from Highway 100. 5.The proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are other signs in the Grandview District that are similar and located on similarly sized buildings. z Appeal Nov 8, 2023 Maison Green apartment complex Additional & Illuminated Signage Variance Does the Maison Green apartment complex sign variance meet Minnesota Statute requirements of city code variances? We argue that it does not. MN Statute - City Variances Edina must prove ”practical difficulties” with its code to grant a variance. MN Statute - Three-factor test for “practical difficulties”: 1. Reasonableness 2. Uniqueness 3. Essential character What are the ”practical difficulties” claimed by Maison Green apartment complex? “the location of the building on a freeway (Highway 100)” The Edina Planning Department argues that the “practical difficulty” is caused by: Test # 1 REASONABLENESS Claim: “Without the signage the building might not be recognized as the destination” and “given the number of street frontages” •The scale is BIG: 7+ stories •Why no proposed sign on the north side of the complex also? •How do Edina residents & guests find other buildings on 100? •Familiar with GPS? Test #2: Uniqueness Claim: The property is unique due to its “location on” & “elevation change from Highway 100” as well as the “number of street frontages.” •Is the property unique, one of a kind? NO. •Directional wayfinding signage does not fulfill the “uniqueness” criteria. Test #3: Essential Character Claim: The signage “would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood” because the Grandview District has buildings with signage of similar scale.” •Current, multi-story residential buildings do not have secondary wayfinding signs •Maison Green & Melody Lake residents will be subjected to an illuminated sign 24/7 Summary Variance requirements NOT met reasonableness, uniqueness, essential character Moreover, a variance for an additional, big scale & illuminated sign: •Breaks established precedent (outlier) •Undermines the Edina Climate Action Plan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ate: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Design Option 1A for Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Design Option 1A for Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge. INTRODUCTION: The current pedestrian bridge is owned and managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). It was built in the 1960s. The bridge does not meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and was substantially damaged when it was struck twice in 2022 by vehicles traveling on Minnesota Highway 62. The damage resulted in the closure of the bridge for most of 2022, until expensive temporary repairs were made in January 2023. There have been extensive discussions between City and MnDOT staff about a plan to replace the bridge. Funding for the project has been secured between a successful capital bonding request in 2023 and MnDOT Funds. MnDOT is also discussing adding a permanent 3rd westbound travel lane on Highway 62 along with a 20- ft tall noise wall. The City has engaged the engineering firm of Bolton-Menk to start the design process for the new bridge. 12 options were reviewed and staff is seeking confirmation of design option 1A so this project could be potentially built in 2025. ATTACHMENTS: Description Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Decision Matrix Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concept Options Draft MnDOT Auxiliary Lane and Noise Wall Graphic Millner, Chad- Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Presentation Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Decision Matrix Br. No. 27520 - Over TH-62 and W 64th St at Rosland Park Date: 10/25/2023 Description No Impact Improvement Sig. Improvement Minor Impact Major Impact Not Feasible Do Nothing Option #1A Option #1B Option #2A Option #2B Option #3 Option #4 Option #5A Option #5B Option #5C Option #6A Option #6B CRITERIA KEEP EXISTING BRIDGE SWITCHBACK RAMPS EAST SWITCHBACK RAMPS WEST SWITCHBACK RAMP EAST (NORTH) & HELIX (SOUTH) SWITCHBACK RAMP WEST (NORTH) & HELIX (SOUTH) MULTI-LEVEL SWITCHBACK RAMP EAST (NORTH) & SWITCHBACK RAMP EAST (SOUTH) SWITCHBACK RAMP EAST (NORTH) & STRAIGHT RAMP (SOUTH) SUPERSTRUCTURE MOVED 470' EAST WITH STRAIGHT RAMPS SUPERSTRUCTURE MOVED 470' WEST WITH STRAIGHT RAMPS SUPERSTRUCTURE MOVED 470' EAST WITH STRAIGHT RAMPS; BETWEEN TH 62 AND LOCAL ROAD ELEVATOR BUILDINGS WITH STAIRS ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH STAIRS (NORTH) & SWITCHBACK RAMP EAST (SOUTH) Limit Bike Speeds No Bikes Switchback Switchback Switchback/Helix Switchback/Helix Multi-Switchback / Switchback Switchback / Straight Ramp Straight Long Ramps Straight Long Ramps Straight Long Ramps Elevator Elevator Bike and Pedestrian ADA Not ADA Compliant Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance Grades/Clearances do Not Meet Design Stds Grades Do Not Meet Design Stds Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance Elevator must remain in- service Elevator must remain in- service Local Roadway Operations No Change No Impact North Ramp Lateral Clearance No Impact North Ramp Lateral Clearance No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact At-grade ped crossing at W 64th No Impact No Impact Impacts to Residential Properties No Change No Impact North Ramp at Window Level No Impact North Ramp at Window Level No Impact No Impact North Ramp at Window Level North Ramp at Window Level North Ramp at Window Level No Change No Change Impacts to Residential Trees No Change Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed TH62 Operations Bridge Collisions Continue Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards (barely - very tight)Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Future Auxiliary Lane / Noise Wall Median Pier Conflict Project readily accomodated Both Projects Not Feasible Project readily accomodated Both Projects Not Feasible Project readily accomodated Project readily accomodated Project readily accomodated Project readily accomodated Project readily accomodated Project readily accomodated Project readily accomodated Impact to Rosland Park Trees No Impact Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Low Impact No Impact Trees Removed (Oaks) Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Rosland Park Impacts & Operations No Change Disc Golf course rerouting & Trail work No Impact Significant Park Impact Significant Park Impact Disc Golf course rerouting & Trail work Disc Golf course rerouting & Trail work Disc Golf course rerouting No Impact No Impact No Impact Disc Golf course rerouting & Trail work Aesthetics No Change Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity, Minimizes Structures Aesthetic Opportunity, Minimizes Structures Structure Maintenance and Operations Future Collision Repairs Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Specialty / High Cost & Frequency Specialty / High Cost & Frequency Right-of-Way Impacts No Change No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact Utility & Signage Impacts No Impact OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South OH Power South & MnDOT OH Sign New Service to Elevator Needed New Service to Elevator Needed Construction Cost No Immediate Costs Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Highest Highest 10/25/20234:33 PM OPTION 1A SHEET 1 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 1A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:38 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE VALLEY VIEW EXIT MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE 60'-0" OPTION 1B SHEET 2 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 1B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:41 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE60'-0" OPTION 2A SHEET 3 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 2A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:44 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW VALLEY VIEW EXIT PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW OVERHEAD SIGN MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE 60'-0" OPTION 2B SHEET 4 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 2B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:46 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW VALLEY VIEW EXIT PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW OVERHEAD SIGN MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE60'-0" SHEET 5 OF 11 OPTION 3 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 3.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:48 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE VALLEY VIEW EXIT MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE TOP OF DECK = 26'-0" HIGH DOUBLE RAMP LOOP 60'-0"STANDARDS. CLEARANCE AND RAMP DESIGN NOT FEASIBLE DUE TO VERTICAL NOTE: THIS OPTION IS CONSIDERED SHEET 6 OF 11 OPTION 4 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 4.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:52 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPEPROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE VALLEY VIEW EXIT MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL60'-0"PARK/COURSE. HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO ALTERNATIVE TIE-IN LOCATIONS WOULD RAMP SLOPE AND TIE-IN LIMITS. NOT FEASIBLE AS SHOWN DUE TO NOTE: THIS OPTION IS CONSIDERED OPTION 5A SHEET 7 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 5A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:54 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW VALLEY VIEW EXIT PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW OVERHEAD SIGN MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE60'-0" OPTION 5B SHEET 8 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 5B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:56 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RWRW PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE 60'-0" SHEET 9 OF 11 OPTION 5C FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 5C.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:57 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW VALLEY VIEW EXIT PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE RW OVERHEAD SIGN MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL 60'-0" SHEET 10 OF 11 OPTION 6A FEETSCALE 60300 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 6A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:58 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW RW MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE VALLEY VIEW EXIT MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING LANDING AND STAIRS ELEEVATOR BUILDING WITH 60'-0"LANDING AND STAIRS ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH SHEET 11 OF 11 FEETSCALE 60300 OPTION 6B H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 6B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:59 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO. DESIGN DATA PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX DES. CHK. DR. CHK. XXXXXX XXX STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER APPROVED: R MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION XXX 7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W. RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com BRIDGE NO. XXXXX PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE XXXXX STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO. SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX XXXXXXX BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: XXXXXXXX RESIDENT ENGINEER: XXXXXXXX ROAD DESIGN UNIT: CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB W 64TH W 64TH ROSE CTRW RW RW RW MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE VALLEY VIEW EXIT PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE MIN. 15'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE MIN. 17'-6" CRITICAL CLEARANCE TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL PED BRIDGE REMOVE EXISTING LANDING AND STAIRS ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH 60'-0" SPI RAL 1000A4137+43.8741354 1 4 0 4 1 4 5 41504155 4160 4165 4170 41754135EQUATION: 4 1 4 0 4 1 4 5 41504155 EQUATION:4160 4165 4170 4175TH62EB3 CS. 4133+96.87TH6 2 EB3 ST. 4 1 3 7 +4 3. 8 7 TH62EB3 PC. 4149+12.67TH62EB3 PT. 4155+75.87TH62WB3 CS. 4134+29.26TH6 2 WB3 ST. 4 1 3 7 +8 2. 2 6TH6 2 WB3 Sta 4 1 3 7 +8 2. 2 6 BK = TH6 2 WB3 Sta 4 1 3 7 +4 6. 8 7 AHTH62WB3 PC. 4149+01.65TH62WB3 PT. 4155+64.84TH62WB3 Sta 4155+64.84 BK = TH62WB3 Sta 4155+98.15 AHEQUATI ON:EQUATI ON:120125LNB99 St a 115+00.85 BK = LNB99 POT. 115+00.88LNB99 St a 115+00.88 AHLNB99 St a 117+53.77 AHLNB99 St a 117+57.65 BK = LNB99 POT. 117+53.77TH 62 - AUXILIARY LANE FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO NB TH 100 POST SPEED 55 PED. BRIDGEPED. BRIDGEWB TH 62 EB TH 62WB TH 6 2EB TH 6 2 IN ADVANCE OF AUX. LANE PROJECT NEW PED. BRIDGE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION FRONTAGE ROAD IMPACT OVERHEAD SIGN IMPACT WB T.H. 100150' RETAINING WALL PARNELL AVE.W. SHORE DR.B618 C&GB618 C&GB624 C&GB624 C&GB624 C&G B624 C&G BIT. 30'B624 C&GB624 C&GBIT.BIT.30'BIT.BIT. TRAILBIT. PARKING LOT BIT. PARKING LOTCONC.BIT. BIT. CONC. BIT. BIT. BIT. BIT. 64TH ST. W.B624 C&GB624 C&GB624 C&GB624 C&GCONC. CONC. BIT. BIT.BI T.CONC. CONC. BIT. TRAIL BIT. TRAILBI T. TRAI L64TH ST. W. B624 C&G B624 C&G24'B 624 C & G B 624 C & G END B624 C&G END B624 C&G CONC. CONC. CONC. CONC. BIT. BIT. BIT. BIT. BIT. 30'BIT.BROOKVIEWB624 C&GB624 C&G64TH ST. W. B624 C&G B624 C&G BIT.BIT.BIT.B618 C&GB618 C&GB618 C&GB618 C&G32.5'32.5' 48.5'BIT.VALLEY VIEW RD.BIT. BIT. BIT. BIT. BIT. 64TH ST. W.MILLER'S LANEBIT. BIT.BIT. CONC. CONC.CONC.CONC.CONC.BIT. D418 C&G D418 C&G 30'BIT.ROSE COURT 64TH ST. W.ST. JOHN'S AVE.CONC. CONC. CONC. CONC. BIT. BIT. CONC. CONC. CONC. CONC. B624 C&G B624 C&G 30'CONC.24'BIT. B624 C&G B624 C&GASHCROFT LANECONC. BIT. CONC.CONC.CONC.CONC.CONC.BIT. BIT. BIT. LEGEND EXISTING R/W PROPOSED AUXILIARY LANE & LEFT LANE PROPOSED C&G PROPOSED CONCRETE BOULEVARD PROPOSED RETAINING WALL W.B. TH 62 FROM STA. 4151+35.19 TO 4152+89.02 1:10 MAX.1:4 TYP. 0.02 GROUNDLINE INPLACE TO P.I. 1.5'PROFILE GRADE SHLD. 4' THRU LANE (INP.) 12' THRU LANE (INP.) 12' CL WB TH 62 AUXILIARY LANE 12' WB T.H. 62 TYPICAL NOISEWALL VARIES VARIES 0.04 0.02 0.02 BLVD. 6.5'- 42' VARIES SHLD. 6' 0.04 1:10 MAX. FRONTAGE RD. 24' CROSS SLOPES MATCH INPLACE 1:4 TYP. W.B. TH 62 FROM STA. 4144+00.00 TO 4154+00.00 VARIES VARIESB624 C&G B624 C&G D424 C&G D424 C&G NOISEWALL 0.02 CL N.E. T.H. 100 RAMP 0.02 0.04 NOISEWALL BLVD. 13' MIN. VARIES 8'8' D424 C&G 1:4 TYP.0.04 N.B. T.H. 100 RAMP 6'6' 1:4 TYP. D424 C&G PROPOSED NOISE WALL UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH STOCK PILE STOCK PILE ????????????????150' RETAINING WALL FRONTAGE ROAD IMPACT OVERHEAD SIGN IMPACT DRAWN BY: CMT IN ADVANCE OF AUX. LANE PROJECT NEW PED. BRIDGE PLANNED CONSTRUCTIONNB TH 1 0 0 PI 2' 50' SCALE IN FEET EdinaMN.gov Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge City Council Meeting November 21, 2023 Chad Millner, Engineering Director Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •Built in the 1960’s •Recall bridge was hit twice in 2022, closed 1-year •Not ADA compliant •Repaired in 2023 but noted replacement within 5-years as the goal with MnDOT •Replacement is Fully Funded •Successful Capital Bonding request in 2023 ($3 Million) •MnDOT has secured the remaining funding for replacement •Construction 2025 –Long Approval Process for Bridges with MnDOT Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •Highway 62 Auxiliary Lane and Noise Wall •MnDOT wants a permanent westbound third lane from Valley View Rd to Highway 100 •If added to their capital plan, 2027 –2028 construction Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •Highway 62 Auxiliary Lane and Noise Wall •MnDOT want a permanent westbound third lane from Valley View Rd to Highway 100 •If added to their capital plan, 2027 –2028 construction Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •Reviewed 11 concepts for replacement and developed decision Matrix •Switchbacks, Helix, No Switchbacks, Stacked Switchbacks, Elevator Building Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •ADA •Limit Bike Speeds •Local Roadway Operations •Impacts to Residential Properties •Impacts to Residential Trees •Highway 62 Operations •Future Auxiliary Lane and Noise Wall *14 Criteria •Impacts to Rosland Park Trees •Impacts to Rosland Park Operations •Aesthetics •Structure Maintenance and Operations •Right of Way Impacts •Utility and Signage Impacts •Construction Cost Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •Staff recommends Option 1A with Switchbacks Noise Wall Location #A Noise Wall Location #B Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge •Staff recommends Option 1A with Switchbacks Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Staff recommends Option 1A with Switchbacks •Meets ADA Requirements •No Impact to Local Street Operations, Highway 62 Operations, Residential Properties, Auxiliary Lane & Noise Wall, and Right-of-Way •Less trees removed north and south of Highway 62 compared to other options •Mid-range Cost •Aesthetics TBD –most likely a similar process to Grandview Pedestrian Bridge •Bring back a Public Engagement Plan to Council for future consideration •Any initial feedback on Aesthetics would be welcomed now Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Staff recommends Option 1A with Switchbacks Requesting a Motion to Support Staff’s Recommendation to Design a New Pedestrian Bridge at Rosland Park detailed in Option 1A with switchbacks with an estimated construction in 2025. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Next Steps for Organized Trash Collection for Single Family Dwellings Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve next steps for Organized Trash Collection for Single Family Dwellings. INTRODUCTION: This discussion is a summary of the analysis on organized trash collection (OTC) for single family dwellings only. It did not review apartments, condominiums, or other property classes. T his analysis includes research from staff and resident Commissioners and input from garbage haulers, residents and legal professionals. Staff’s role on this topic is to synthesize input from these different stakeholders and provide information to City Council to make an informed decision on next steps. Staff is presenting the City Council with two possible options: 1. Status Quo – stay as an open collection system. 2. Begin the legal process to organize trash collection. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Organized Trash Collection for Single Family Dwellings Millner, Chad- Organized Trash Collection Presentation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Date: October 10, 2023 To: Mayor and City Council Cc: Scott Neal, City Manager From: Chad Millner, Engineering Director Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist I/Recycling Coordinator Twila Singh, Organics Recycling Coordinator Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Subject: Organized Trash Collection on Single Family Dwellings Executive Summary This report is a summary of the analysis on organized trash collection (OTC) for single family dwellings only. It did not review apartments, condominiums, or other property classes. This analysis includes research from staff and resident Commissioners and input from garbage haulers, residents and legal professionals. Staff’s role on this topic is to synthesize input from these different stakeholders and provide information to City Council to make an informed decision on next steps. Staff are presenting the City Council with two possible options. 1. Status Quo – stay as an open collection system. 2. Begin the legal process to organize trash collection. Positive Possible Outcome of OTC Negative Possible Outcome of OTC Staffing Major concern. The initiative would fail without proper staffing. Additional staffing is required. Fees can be added to contracts to cover cost. Green House Gas Reduction Some reduction in fuel use and GHG emissions, unable to quantify, most likely incremental reductions. Fuel use more related to engine hours versus miles traveled. Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Equity Some customers may see reduction in garbage fees and all will see more transparency in pricing. Some customers may see an increase in garbage fees. Quality of Life – Traffic Safety Neutral – Data does not support greater or lesser impacts on traffic safety. Neutral – Data does not support greater or lesser impacts on traffic safety. Quality of Life – Noise Some reduction in overall noise generated by garbage operations. Quality of Life – Customer Service Some customers will receive improved customer service. Some customers may receive reduced customer service. Economic Development Does not support the City’s stated goal as it generally prevents or significantly limits business growth. Impacts to Roads Neutral – roads are designed for the impacts from garbage operations. Neutral – roads are designed for the impacts from garbage operations. Background Minn. Stat. §115A.941 requires every city with a population of 1,000 or more to ensure that every residential household and business within the city has solid waste collection service. Cities have three options to comply with the statute: 1. Cities can require by ordinance that every household and business has a contract for collection services. This is often referred to as an open collection system. Edina City Code requires properties to utilize “a collector duly licensed by the City.” There are six licensed haulers that provide residential service in Edina; Aspen Waste Systems, Curbside Waste, Republic Services, Suburban Waste Service, Vierkant Disposal, and Waste Management. 2. Cities can organize collection pursuant to the procedures established by Minn. Stat. §115A.94. An organized collection system is one in which “a specified collector, or a member of an organization of collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area or areas some of all of the solid waste that is released by generators for collection.” Bloomington, St. Louis Park, Page 3 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Minneapolis and Richfield all utilize organized trash collection. 3. Cities can organize collection as a municipal service where city employees collect solid waste from a defined geographic service area or areas. Hopkins provides solid waste collection services for single family, duplex and triplex dwelling units (multi-family units, commercial and institutional buildings are required to contract for collection services). In Edina, recycling and organics recycling have been organized since 1989 and 2020, respectively. These programs were easier to initiate because they are exempt from the requirements of Minn. Stat. §115A.94 since they meet of the definition of collecting recyclables. Commission Initiative As part of their 2021 work plan, the Transportation Commission investigated the impacts of organized trash collection, specifically related to traffic, the environment and damage to roadways. Their final report stated that the Commission “believes that there is sufficient evidence to support moving forward with establishing organized trash collection in Edina and recommends that City Council direct staff to create a plan to establish organized trash collection, including determining staffing/administrative costs, timeline and a communication plan to educate the community and solicit public input.” The Energy and Environment Commission reviewed and commented on a draft version of the ETC report at their September 9, 2021 regular meeting and voted in support of it. At the time, staff did not support the Commission’s recommendation. Staff did suggest the following actions if City Council wished to move forward: • Directing the City Manager to study the possible revision of Question 31 in future Quality of Life Surveys to accurately reflect the legal process for organizing trash collection. This suggestion was accepted and the Quality of Life Survey question was amended. • Directing the City Manager to review staffing levels and administrative costs required if organized trash collection were to be implemented. This suggestion resulted in informational interviews between Edina staff and staff in cities with organized collection to understand staffing needs for such an initiative. • Hosting a community forum on organized trash collection, including licensed haulers, city staff and subject-matter experts from other cities. This suggestion resulted in an informal roundtable hosted by City staff with representatives from all licensed haulers in Edina in attendance. The Transportation Commission also submitted two advisory communications to City Council in 2022 related to organized trash collection. Procedural Requirements As previously noted, Minn. Stat. §115A.94 establishes the process for implementing organized collection. First, the City would have to give notice to the public and all licensed haulers that it is considering adopting Page 4 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 organized collection. From there, the City would enter into a negotiation period with the licensed haulers for at least 60 days. The goal of these negotiations is to create a proposal where each hauler is assigned a specific area of the City to collect from while maintaining their respective market share of business. Haulers may opt out from the proposal; the City would then reallocate their customers proportionately to the remaining participating haulers. If an agreement is reached as a result of negotiation, the City must again provide public notice and conduct a public hearing before officially deciding to implement organized collection. In this scenario, the initial agreement must be in effect for seven years. If the City were not to reach an agreement with the licensed haulers, it may form a solid waste collection options committee to study additional methods of solid waste collection. Members of the committee would be appointed by City Council and their meetings would be subject to Open Meeting Law. The committee would have four primarily duties; 1. Determine which methods of solid waste collection to examine, which must include the existing system, a single-collector system and a multiple-collector system. 2. Establish a list of criteria on which the collection methods selected for examination will be evaluated. 3. Collect information regarding the operation and efficacy of existing methods of organized collection in other cities and towns. 4. Seek input from (at a minimum) City Council, the city official responsible for solid waste issues, licensed haulers and residents. The committee must then issue a report with its findings and recommendations to City Council. Again, the City must provide public notice and conduct at least one public hearing before deciding to implement organized collection. Cities can begin organized collection no sooner than six months after making the official decision. Cities have been met with varying levels of community opposition when attempting to regulate trash collection, including lawsuits in the Cities of St. Paul and Bloomington. Both of these lawsuits related to resident’s ability to petition for a ballot question in a home-rule charter city. Unlike St. Paul and Bloomington, Edina is a statutory city. Considerations The arguments for and against organized collection relate to variety of strategic initiatives and goals, including staffing, sustainability, equity, quality of life, economic development, and asset management. Staffing If this initiative were to move forward, staff does not have the capacity to implement, operate and provide the needed customer service. This work would be an extra burden on the Finance Department and Community Health Division. Richfield and Bloomington both hired an additional staff position when they Page 5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 transitioned to organized collection. According to a legal review, if organized trash were to move forward, a fee could be added to the contracts to fund additional staff to handle the additional workload. It has been suggested by other agencies and waste haulers to have the person responsible for this initiative in place before starting the legal negotiation process. Sustainability Supporters of organized collection claim that it reduces vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and therefore reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. According to the waste haulers its more about engine hours than miles traveled. The Climate Action Plan establishes goals for both decreasing VMT (7% by 2030) and reducing GHG emissions (45% below 2019 levels by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050). A 2009 report published by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) estimated changes in fuel consumption for five cities with open collection systems. As the Transportation Commission noted in their 2021 report, there is potential for fuel reduction used for trash collection. However, the associated reduction in GHG emissions would likely have limited impact relative to Edina’s emissions reduction goals (as a percentage of reduction from 2019 levels). It is also worth noting that waste management in Edina constitutes a small percentage of city-wide GHG emissions (1.7% of 2019 levels from the 2021 Community GHG Emissions Progress Summary dated December 2022). Equity Organized collection also allows for price transparency, eliminating potential disparities among customers receiving the same level of service. In Richfield, it was discovered that some residents were paying different rates for similar service levels and that this disproportionally impacted residents that were elderly, on a fixed or low income, and those whose native language was not English. Richfield obtained this data by asking residents to share their recent invoices on the city’s Facebook page. Licensed haulers in Edina were not willing to share their current prices with staff citing a desire to maintain competitive advantage, so staff is not able to ascertain whether similar inequities are occurring in Edina without asking customers directly. If these disparities exist, taking steps to eliminate them would support the goals of the City’s Race and Equity Implementation Plan. Quality of Life Improved quality of life is among the frequently cited advantages to organized collection. Though this is a difficult measure to quantify, there are three areas that are often discussed: Traffic Safety – According to MnDOT’s Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT2), 314 reported crashes since 2013 have involved a medium or large trucks (weighing over 10,000 lbs.) in Edina. This accounts for less than 5% of all reported crashes in the same time period. Due to the limitations of the dataset, it is not possible to determine what percentage of crashes specifically involved a garbage truck. While only eight reports specifically mention a garbage truck in the narrative, nine reports do not provide a narrative at all. At most, it could be estimated that 0.25% Page 6 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 of reported crashes involve a garbage truck. Based on this data, a traffic safety issue does not exist with garage trucks. Noise Pollution – Garbage trucks and garbage collection operations create noise. The volume and duration of the noises vary by the type of truck, type of waste being collected, and duration of operation. Noice was not mentioned in ETC’s report. Other studies mention reductions in noise as a potential advantage but little to no data is available. Customer Service – Proponents of organized collection note that it allows cities to establish consistent service requirements for different haulers and provides more accountability for complaints (since they would be submitted to one staff person rather than going directly to the haulers). The City has not specifically solicited public feedback on quality of garbage collection, but it has used the biennial Quality of Life Survey (QLS) as a proxy for public opinion. The results of this survey demonstrate that residents are very satisfied with the quality of their current service. Between 2015 and 2023, nearly 9 in 10 respondents gave excellent or good ratings to the quality of garbage collection (see Figure 1). The survey has also noted similar results for recycling and organics. The results show high and stable ratings. According to Polco, the administrators of the survey, these ratings are comparable to Minnesota and national averages. Figure 1: Quality of Garbage Collection By Year Source: 2023 City of Edina Quality of Life Survey The QLS also asks residents to rate their level of support for the City changing from the current open collection system to an organized collection system. Between 2015 and 2021, depending if “Don’t Know” answers are included or excluded from analysis, the range of support varies from 46% to 59% for organized trash collection and the range opposed varies from 32% to 40%. In 2023, the wording of the question was adjusted based on the Transportation Commission’s recommendation (see Figure 2). Page 7 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 QLS Year Question Wording 2015-2021 “Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection. To what extent do you support the City changing from the current system in which residents may choose from several different haulers to a system where the City chooses one hauler for the whole community?” 2023 “Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection: an open system or an organized system. An open system means all haulers serve all areas, resulting in many garbage trucks on neighborhood streets on garbage day. Residents choose their own haulers. An organized system means haulers are assigned to specific areas, resulting in only one garbage hauler on neighborhood streets on garbage day. The City organizes the haulers. To what extent do you support the City changing from the current open collection process to an organized collection system?” Figure 2: Organized Trash Collection Question Wording by Year Source: 2021-2023 City of Edina Quality of Life Surveys That same year, about 6 in 10 respondents somewhat or strongly supported changing to organized trash collection if you remove the Don’t Know responses (see Figure 3). Figure 3: Support for Change in Garbage Collection System by Year Source: 2023 City of Edina Quality of Life Survey Polco noted several demographics who were more likely to support an organized trash collection system; these include renters (78%), residents living in southeastern Edina (68%), residents between the ages of 18 and 34 (86%) and those who have lived in Edina for five years or less (72%). Page 8 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 It should be noted that the percentages expressed in Figure 3 exclude respondents who answered, “Don’t Know,” which comprises about 20% of respondents, on average. Figure 4 shows a breakdown of all submitted responses. Figure 4: Support for Change in Garbage Collection System by Year Source: 2015-2023 City of Edina Quality of Life Surveys Many haulers provide additional benefits such as backdoor service. This means they grab the container from a location that is not on the street. This builds rapport between customers and haulers. This service can still be provided with organized collection. Edina City Code requires this service at no additional cost. Economic Development Garbage haulers tend to be opposed to organized collection, especially smaller companies. One reason is that it limits opportunities for expansion to contract openings. In open collection, customers can “shop around” for companies that provide the level of service they require at a price that is reasonable to them. In organized collection, customers do not have the ability to select their own hauler as they are each assigned specific geographic areas within the city. Haulers also note that the procedures for organizing as prescribed by state statute can create a scenario where cities can consolidate collection to one hauler for the entire city at the end of the first negotiated contract. According to the Economic Competitiveness chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, the City “strives to work with the local business community to sustain a regulatory environment that provides the necessary safeguards without stifling business growth and creativity.” To this end, organized collection does not support the City’s stated goal as it generally prevents or significantly limits business growth. 22 20 15 25 18 21 19 18 22 20 22 19 15 26 18 20 21 15 21 23 28 18 11 21 22 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Strongly Support Somewhat Support Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose Don't Know% of RespondentsResponse 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 Page 9 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Impacts to Roads The impacts of trash operations on the life of street pavements has been referenced in various reports. In staff’s opinion, there is little evidence to support the idea that reducing garbage trucks will improve quality of roadways. The majority of damage comes from moisture, oxidation, freeze-thaw cycles rather than vehicle loads. Edina streets are designed to handle the loading associated with garbage trucks. Summary of Feedback from Waste Haulers The following points are staffs summary of the feedback received from the residential waste haulers from in person meetings, phone conversations, emails and letter. • General opinion, OTC supports large haulers over small haulers and eventually shrinks the number of haulers. This contraction of haulers may be easier for large haulers to absorb. Large firms may have different agreements with disposal sites thus giving them an advantage. • The city could legally consolidate the number of haulers after the first contract. • Smaller, more local firms pride themselves on customer service and choice. This ability to provide a unique customer service model would be lost. • May be difficult to detail and enforce the customer service standards in the contracts vs the open market where customers find the service they want. • Noted very limited impacts to miles traveled and emissions because engine hours stay the same. Trucks still need to drive on each street and most of the mileage occurs when travelling to the waste disposal site. • No noted traffic safety studies or impacts. Appendices A. League of Minnesota Cities Informational Memo, August 3, 2023 B. Transportation Commission Report, October 28, 2021 C. Letter from Suburban Waste Services, November 2, 2021 D. Staff Report, December 21, 2021 E. Studying Organized Collection Memo, January 20, 2022 F. Transportation Commission Advisory Communication, January 20, 2022 G. Transportation Commission Advisory Communication, December 15, 2022 H. Letter from Curbside Waste, July 21, 2023 I. Notes from Licensed Hauler Discussions, August 7 and 14, 2023 Appendix A League of Minnesota Ci�es Informa�onal Memo August 3, 2023 145 University Ave. West www.lmc.org 8/3/2023 Saint Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 or (800) 925-1122 © 2023 All Rights Reserved This material is provided as general information and is not a substitute for legal advice. Consult your attorney for advice concerning specific situations. INFORMATION MEMO City Solid Waste Management Understand city authority and requirements to regulate the collection and disposal of solid waste and the roles of state and county oversight. Read about city licensing authority and permitted assessments and fees. Learn about open and organized systems of solid waste collection, including their advantages and disadvantages. Includes a flowchart showing the process for adopting organized collection. RELEVANT LINKS: I. Authority, oversight, and definitions A. Authority to regulate Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. 22 (3). Minn. Stat. § 410.33. Troje v. City Council of City of Hastings, 310 Minn. 183, 245 N.W.2d 596 (1976). All cities are authorized to provide for or regulate by ordinance the disposal of sewage, garbage, and other refuse. This broad grant of police power authorizes cities to regulate the collection and disposal of solid waste. B. Authority to acquire, construct, and operate solid waste facilities—first class cities First class cities (Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, and Rochester) are authorized: Minn. Stat. § 443.18. Minn. Stat. § 410.01. • To acquire by purchase or condemnation lands on which to build plants for the destruction of garbage and other refuse. • To purchase, build, operate, and maintain such plants for the destruction of garbage and other refuse. • To provide for the collection of all such garbage or refuse and its delivery to destruction plants or other places. • To pay and contract to pay for the same in such annual installments and at such a rate of interest on deferred payments as the city council determines. See Minn. Stat. §§ 443.18-443.35 for more information about first class cities’ authority and restrictions regarding solid waste management. Each of these actions must be authorized by at least a three-fourths vote of all members of the city council. First class cities have additional authority and restrictions regarding solid waste management. C. State oversight See Information Brief, Minnesota Solid Waste History, Minnesota House of Representatives. Before the 1970s, open burning and open dumping were the most common forms of solid waste management. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 2 Beginning in the 1970s, the Minnesota Legislature adopted a variety of waste management regulations, and it gave the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regulatory oversight over the management of solid waste and recycling. Minn. Stat. § 115A.46. For Government and Partners: Materials and waste management, MPCA. The MPCA develops and enforces the state’s solid waste management regulations. It also is responsible for approving the solid waste plans that counties must adopt. The MPCA offers a variety of tools to help counties, cities, and townships develop and support systems that recover resources and manage waste. See Minn. Stat. ch. 115A. The Minnesota Legislature adopted the Waste Management Act in 1980. It establishes the following descending order of preference for waste management: Minn. Stat. § 115A.02. • Waste reduction and reuse. • Waste recycling. • Composting of source-separated compostable materials, including, but not limited to, yard waste and food waste. • Resource recovery through mixed municipal solid waste composting or incineration. • Land disposal that produces no measurable methane gas or that involves the retrieval of methane gas as a fuel for the production of energy to be used on-site or for sale. • Land disposal that produces measurable methane and that does not involve the retrieval of methane gas as a fuel for the production of energy to be used on-site or for sale. D. County oversight Minn. Stat. § 115A.46. Minn. Stat. § 400.16. Minn. Stat. § 473.149. Minn. R. ch. 9215. Minnesota counties have primary responsibility for solid waste management, including recycling. All counties are required to adopt a solid waste plan that must include waste reduction and recycling provisions, as well as provisions to minimize the amount of waste disposed of in landfills. Minn. Stat. § 115A.46 subd. 5. After the MPCA has approved a county’s solid waste plan, a city located in that county may not enter into a binding agreement governing solid waste management activity or develop or implement solid waste management activity (other than activity to reduce waste generation or reuse waste materials) that is inconsistent with the county’s plan without the county’s consent. Minn. Stat. § 473.149. See Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2016-2036. Metropolitan counties must develop solid waste management plans that are consistent with the most recent “metropolitan long-range policy plan.” RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 3 E. Definitions 1. Mixed municipal solid waste Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 21. Mixed municipal solid waste is defined as “garbage, refuse, and other solid waste from residential, commercial, industrial, and community activities that the generator of the waste aggregates for collection.” Mixed municipal solid waste does not include “auto hulks, street sweepings, ash, construction debris, mining waste, sludges, tree and agricultural wastes, tires, lead acid batteries, motor and vehicle fluids and filters, and other materials collected, processed, and disposed of as separate waste streams.” 2. Solid waste Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 31. Minn. Stat. § 116.06, subd. 22. Solid waste is defined as “garbage, refuse, sludge from a water supply treatment plant or air contaminant treatment facility, and other discarded waste materials and sludges, in solid, semisolid, liquid, or contained gaseous form, resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and from community activities.” Solid waste does not include: • Hazardous waste. • Animal waste used as fertilizer. • Earthen fill, boulders, rock. • Concrete diamond grinding and saw slurry associated with the construction, improvement, or repair of a road when deposited on the road project site in a manner that is in compliance with best management practices and rules of the agency. • Sewage sludge. • Solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage or other common pollutants in water resources, such as silt, dissolved or suspended solids in industrial wastewater effluents or discharges which are point sources subject to permits under section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, dissolved materials in irrigation return flows. • Source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Minn. Stat. § 115A.951. Minn. Stat. § 115A.96. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 17a. Minn. Stat. § 115A.9565. Minn. Stat. § 115A.931. Minn. Stat. § 115A.935. Minn. Stat. § 115A.932. Minn. Stat. § 115A.9155. Minn. Stat. § 115A.9157. State law specifically prohibits certain items from being included in mixed municipal solid waste or in solid waste, including: telephone directories, major appliances, electronic products containing a cathode-ray tube, yard waste, tires, motor and vehicle fluids and filters, mercury or mercury- containing devices or products from which the mercury has not been removed for reuse or recycling, fluorescent tubes, and certain batteries. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 4 3. Yard waste Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 38. Yard waste is defined as “garden wastes, leaves, lawn cuttings, weeds, shrub and tree waste, and prunings.” 4. Recyclable materials Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 25a. Recyclable materials are defined as “materials that are separated from mixed municipal solid waste for the purpose of recycling or composting, including paper, glass, plastics, metals, automobile oil, batteries, source-separated compostable materials, and sole sourced waste streams that are managed through biodegradative processes.” Recyclable materials do not include refuse-derived fuel or other material that is destroyed by incineration. 5. Source-separated recyclable materials Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 32b. Source-separated recyclable materials are defined as “recyclable materials, including commingled recyclable materials that are separated by the generator.” 6. Source-separated compostable materials Source-separated compostable materials are defined as materials that: Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 32a. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93. • Are separated at the source by waste generators for the purpose of preparing them for use as compost. • Are collected separately from mixed municipal solid waste and are governed by the licensing provisions of section 115A.93. • Are comprised of food wastes, fish and animal waste, plant materials, diapers, sanitary products, and paper that is not recyclable. • Are delivered to a facility to undergo controlled microbial degradation to yield a humus-like product meeting the MPCA’s class I or class II, or equivalent, compost standards, and where process rejects do not exceed 15 percent by weight of the total material delivered to the facility. • May be delivered to a transfer station, mixed municipal solid waste processing facility, or recycling facility only for the purposes of composting or transfer to a composting facility, unless the commissioner determines that no other person is willing to accept the materials. 7. Organized collection Minn. Stat. § 115A.94. See Section IV, Solid waste and recycling collection, for more information about organized collection. Organized collection is defined as “a system for collecting solid waste in which a specified collector, or a member of an organization of collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area or areas some or all of the solid waste that is released by generators for collection.” RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 5 8. Open collection Waste Management in Minnesota, Minnesota State Auditor. Open collection is generally defined as a system for collecting solid waste or recyclable materials where individual residents and businesses are free to contract with any collector licensed to do business in the city. II. City regulation and licensing A. Required regulation There are three situations where cities are required to regulate solid waste collection. 1. County organized collection ordinance Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 5. See Section IV, Solid waste and recycling collection, for more information about organized collection. Any county can adopt an ordinance requiring cities or towns within its boundaries to organize collection of solid waste. If a city does not comply with the county’s organized collection ordinance, the county can organize collection itself. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 5. A county’s organized collection ordinance—in addition to requiring solid waste collection—may also require the separation and separate collection of recyclable materials, specify the material to be separated, and require cities to meet any performance standards for source separation contained in the county’s solid waste plan. 2. Cities in the metropolitan area Minn. Stat. § 473.811, subd. 5(b). Minn. Stat. § 473.121. Cities in the metropolitan area must adopt an ordinance regulating the collection of solid waste within its boundaries. The metropolitan area includes the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota (excluding the cities of Northfield and Cannon Falls), Hennepin (excluding the cities of Hanover and Rockford), Ramsey, Scott (excluding the city of New Prague), and Washington. If a city is located in a metropolitan county that has adopted a collection ordinance, the city must adopt either the county ordinance by reference or a stricter ordinance. If a city is located in a metropolitan county that has adopted a recyclable-separation ordinance, the ordinance applies in all cities within the county that have failed to meet the local abatement performance standards stated in the most recent annual county report. 3. Cities with a population of 1,000 or more Minn. Stat. § 115A.941. Any city, regardless of where it is located, with a population of 1,000 or more must ensure that every residential household and business in the city has solid waste collection service. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 6 Minn. Stat. § 115A.941. See Section IV, Solid waste and recycling collection, for more information about organized collection. To comply with this requirement, cities are authorized to organize solid waste collection, provide collection by city employees, or require by ordinance that every household and business has a contract for collection services. An ordinance with such a requirement must also provide for enforcement. Cities must follow specific procedural requirements before adopting organized collection of solid waste. Minn. Stat. § 115A.941 (b). A city with a population of 1,000 or more may exempt a residential household or business from the requirement to have solid waste collection service if the household or business ensures that an environmentally sound alternative is used. B. Recycling required at city facilities Minn. Stat. § 115A.151. All statutory and home rule charter cities are required to ensure that facilities under their control, from which mixed municipal solid waste is collected, have containers for at least three recyclable materials, such as, but not limited to, paper, glass, plastic, and metal. Cities also must transfer all recyclable materials collected to a recycler. C. Licensing 1. Solid waste collectors Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 1. State law prohibits any person from collecting mixed municipal solid waste for hire without a license from the jurisdiction where that waste is collected. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 1(a). Troje v. City Council of City of Hastings, 310 Minn. 183, 245 N.W.2d 596 (1976). Cities are authorized to license solid waste collectors. If a city does so, it must submit a list of licensed collectors to the MPCA. County boards are required to adopt by resolution the licensing authority of any city that does not license solid waste collectors. If a city acts as a licensing authority, it may impose requirements that are consistent with the county’s solid waste policies. In addition, state law establishes several requirements that must be imposed for any license issued to a solid waste collector. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 3(a). First, a license must require collectors to impose charges for collection of mixed municipal solid waste that increase with the volume or the weight of waste collected. For example, a solid waste collector could charge fees that increase with the increasing volume of solid waste generated by customers. Garbage carts of different sizes, measured by their volume in gallons, could be issued to customers who can decide what size garbage cart best suits their disposal needs. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 3(d). The commissioner of the MPCA may exempt a licensing authority from this requirement if the county in which the city is located has an approved solid waste plan that concludes that variable rate pricing is not appropriate for that jurisdiction because it is inconsistent with other incentives and mechanisms RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 7 implemented that are more effective in attaining the goals of discouraging on-site disposal, littering, and illegal dumping. The commissioner may also exempt a collector from this requirement while revisions are being made to the county’s solid waste plan if certain conditions are met. The exemption is only effective until the county solid waste plan is revised. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 3a. Second, a license that requires a pricing system based on volume instead of weight shall determine a base unit size for an average small quantity household generator of waste and establish, or require the licensee to establish, a multiple unit pricing system that ensures that amounts of waste generated in excess of the base unit amount are priced higher than the base unit price. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 3(c). Third, a license shall prohibit collectors from imposing a greater charge on residents who recycle than on residents who do not. 2. Recycling collectors Minn. Stat. § 115A.553, subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 1(b). Counties can require either county or municipal licenses for the collection of recyclable materials. A person may not collect recyclable materials for hire unless that person is licensed locally or is registered with the MPCA. Each county must ensure that materials separated for recycling are taken to markets for sale or to recyclable material processing centers. No county may prevent a person that generates or collects solid waste from delivering recyclable materials to a recycling facility of the generator’s or collector’s choice. Minn. Stat. § 115A.46, subd. 5. If a city acts as a licensing authority, it may impose requirements that are consistent with the county’s recycling policies. A city can also impose requirements that are in addition to or different from the county’s policies if the city’s requirements are designed to reduce waste generation or promote the reuse of waste materials. 3. License fees Orr v. City of Rochester, 193 Minn. 371, 258 N.W. 569 (1935). State law does not address the amount that cities can charge for licenses for collection of solid waste or recyclable materials. Generally, a license fee must be reasonable. It should not be viewed as a source of revenue and should be in an amount that is close to the direct and indirect costs in issuing the license and regulating the licensed activity. D. Requiring use of specific waste facility Waste Systems Corp. v. County of Martin, 985 F.2d 1381 (8th Cir. 1993). C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York, 511 U.S. 383 (1994). Some municipalities have adopted ordinances that regulate the flow of solid waste, for example, by designating where it must be taken for disposal. This is generally done as a tool to achieve solid waste management goals. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 8 Ben Oehrleins and Sons and Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin County, 115 F.3d 1372 (8th Cir. 1997). Flow control ordinances may raise constitutional issues under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution if they interfere with the flow of interstate commerce. City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 U.S. 617 (1978). United Haulers Ass’n, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Auth., 550 U.S. 330 (2007). Courts have recognized a distinction under the Commerce Clause that generally allows municipalities more authority to take actions affecting solid waste if they are acting as a “market participant” instead of as a government regulator. When a municipality is providing for or contracting for waste management services, it generally is thought to be acting as a market participant. LSP Transmission Holdings, LLC v. Sieben, 954 F.3d 1018, 1026 (8th Cir. 2020). General Motors Corporation v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278, 306 (1997). Paul's Industrial Garage, Inc. v. Goodhue County, No. 21-2614 (8th Cir. 2022). The dormant Commerce Clause prohibits states from implementing regulations that favor in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors. However, Courts have found that local governments may provide differential treatment to entities that perform different services in the same market as long as no actual or prospective competition exists. For example, a county ordinance that requires waste be made into refuse-derived fuel (RDF) and transferred to a state-run energy plant instead of contracting an out of state entity that transfers waste to a landfill does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause because the out-of-state entity performs a different service. Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.83-115A.86. State law authorizes counties or sanitary districts to adopt a designation ordinance requiring that all solid waste generated within a specific geographic area must be delivered to a specific solid waste facility. A designation ordinance does not apply to the following materials: Minn. Stat. § 115A.83 subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subds. 27 and 28. • Materials separated from solid waste and recovered for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes. • Materials that are processed at a resource recovery facility at the capacity in operation at the time that the designation plan is approved by the commissioner of the MPCA. • Materials that are separated at a permitted transfer station located within the boundaries of the designating authority for the purpose of recycling the materials if either: (1) the transfer station was in operation on Jan. 1, 1991; or (2) the materials were not being separated for recycling at the designated facility at the time the transfer station began separation of the materials. • Recyclable materials that are being recycled, and residuals from recycling if there is at least an 85 percent volume reduction in the solid waste processed at the recycling facility and the residuals are managed as separate waste streams. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 9 Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 3. Minn. Stat. § 115A.86. If a city organizes collection, by contract or as a municipal service, it may include a requirement that all or any portion of the solid waste be delivered to a waste facility identified by the city. This requirement would not apply to recyclable materials and materials that are processed at a resource recovery facility at the capacity in operation at the time the requirement is imposed. In a district or county where a resource recovery facility has been designated by ordinance, organized collection must conform to the designation ordinance’s requirements. Minn. Stat. § 473.813. Minn. Stat. § 473.121. Cities in the metropolitan area have authority to directly negotiate and enter into contracts—for a term not to exceed 30 years—for the delivery of solid waste to a waste facility, and the processing of solid waste. Contracts made by direct negotiations shall be approved by resolution. LMCIT staff can assist in reviewing city contracts, especially provisions related to insurance and liability. For more information, contact Chris Smith, Risk Management Attorney, at csmith@lmc.org or 651-281-1269. Before a city in the metropolitan area enters into a contract for a period of more than five years, it must submit the proposed contract and a description of the proposed activities under the contract to the commissioner of the MPCA for review and approval. E. Customer lists Minn. Stat. § 115A.93, subd. 5. Minn. Stat. § 13.02, subds. 9, 12. Customer lists that solid waste collectors provide to cities are private data on individuals, or nonpublic data with regard to data not on individuals, under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. III. City assessments and fees A. Assessments for unpaid services Minn. Stat. § 443.015. See Adopting Assessments for Unpaid Charges for Garbage Collection and Disposal Services, LMC Model Resolution, and Providing for Assessment of Unpaid Charges for Garbage Collection and Disposal Services, LMC Model Ordinance. Any statutory city or city of the fourth class that provides, by contract or otherwise, for garbage collection and disposal may by ordinance require the owners of all property served to pay the proportionate cost of the service to their properties. The city council may annually levy an assessment equal to the unpaid cost as of Sept. 1 of each year against each lot or parcel of land. The assessment may include a penalty not to exceed 10 percent of the unpaid amount, and shall bear interest not exceeding 6 percent per year. Such assessments shall be certified to the county auditor and shall be collected and remitted to the city treasurer in the same manner as assessments for local improvements. Minn. Stat. § 443.29. First class cities (Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, and Rochester) have additional authority to collect unpaid charges for rubbish disposal in a civil action, or to assess them against the property receiving the service and collect them as other taxes are collected. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 10 B. City fees 1. Operators of disposal facilities Minn. Stat. § 115A.921, subd. 1. A city may charge a fee that cannot exceed $1 per cubic yard of waste, or its equivalent, on operators of facilities for the disposal of mixed municipal solid waste located in the city. The fees must be credited to the city’s general fund. Revenue produced by 25 cents of the fee must be used only for purposes of landfill abatement or for mitigating and compensating for the local risks, costs, and other adverse effects of the facilities. Revenue produced by the balance of the fee may be used for any general fund purpose. Minn. Stat. § 115A.921, subd. 1(b). There is an exemption from this fee for waste residue from recycling facilities at which recyclable materials are separated or processed for the purpose of recycling, or from energy and resource-recovery facilities at which solid waste is processed for the purpose of extracting, reducing, converting to energy, or otherwise separating and preparing solid waste for reuse if there is at least an 85 percent weight reduction in the solid waste processed. Minn. Stat. § 115A.921, subd. 2. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 7. A city also may charge a fee not to exceed 50 cents per cubic yard of waste, or its equivalent, on operators of facilities for the disposal of construction debris located within the city. The revenue from the fees must be credited to the city general fund. Two-thirds of the revenue must be used only for purposes of landfill abatement or for purposes of mitigating and compensating for the local risks, costs, and other adverse effects resulting from the facilities. Minn. Stat. § 115A.921, subd. 2. There is an exemption from 25 percent of this fee if the facility has implemented a recycling program that the county has approved, and 25 percent if the facility contains a liner and leachate collection system the MPCA has approved. Two-thirds of the revenue from this fee must offset any financial assurances required by the city for a construction debris facility. The maximum revenue that may be collected for this type of fee must be determined by multiplying the total permitted capacity of a facility by 15 cents per cubic yard. Once the maximum revenue has been collected for a facility, the fees in this subdivision may no longer be imposed. 2. Accounting for fees Minn. Stat. § 115A.929. Cities that provide for solid waste management shall account for all revenue collected from waste management fees, together with interest earned on revenue from the fees, separately from other revenue collected by the city. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 11 Cities must report revenue collected from the fees and use of the revenue separately from other revenue and use of revenue in any required financial report or audit. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 36. A city provides solid waste management and is subject to this requirement for a separate accounting and reporting if a city engages in any activities that are intended to affect or control the generation of waste, or engages in any activities that provide for or control the collection, processing, and disposal of waste. State law defines waste management fees as: Minn. Stat. § 115A.919. Minn. Stat. § 115A.921. Minn. Stat. § 115A.923. For more information about these fees see Section III. B., City Fees. Minn. Stat. § 115A.929. • All fees, charges, and surcharges collected under sections 115A.919, 115A.921, and 115A.923 of the Minnesota Statutes. • All tipping fees collected at waste management facilities owned or operated by the city. • All city charges for waste collection and management services. • Any other fees, charges, or surcharges imposed on waste for the purpose of waste management, whether collected directly from generators, indirectly through property taxes, or as part of utility or other charges for city-provided services. Minn. Stat. § 115A.945. Any city that provides or pays for the costs of collection or disposal of solid waste must, through a billing or other system, make the prorated share of those costs for each solid waste generator visible and obvious to the generator. IV. Solid waste and recycling collection A. Types of collection systems—open collection and organized collection Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, June 2009. The two main types of collection systems for solid waste and recycling are commonly referred to as “open collection” and “organized collection.” A 2009 study authorized by the MPCA estimated that the number of cities with open solid waste collection was between 65 to 80 percent, and the number of cities with organized solid waste collection was between 20 to 35 percent. The same study indicated that the number of cities with open recycling was estimated to be between 40 to 60 percent, and the number of cities with organized recycling was estimated to be between 50 to 60 percent. Open collection is generally defined as a collection system where individual residents and businesses are free to contract with any collector licensed to do business in the city. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subds. 1, 3. See Section IV.D., Procedural requirements for adopting organized collection, for more information. Organized collection is defined as a “system for collecting solid waste in which a specified collector, or a member of an organization of collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area or areas some or all of the solid waste that is released by generators for collection.” RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 12 A city must comply with certain procedural requirements in the organized collection statute before adopting organized collection of solid waste. There may be additional procedural requirements for home rule charter cities. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 3. A city may organize collection as a municipal service where city employees collect solid waste from a defined geographic service area or areas. In the alternative, cities may organize collection by using one or more private collectors or an organization of collectors. The agreement with the private collectors may be made through an ordinance, franchise, license, negotiated or bidded contract, or by other means. Minn. Stat. § 471.345. Minn. Stat. § 412.311. Schwandt Sanitation of Paynesville v. City of Paynesville, 423 N.W.2d 59 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). The competitive bidding requirements in state law do not apply to city contracts for solid waste collection because a contract for these services does not meet the definition of a “contract” that is subject to the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 3. Minn. Stat. § 115A.86. Organized collection accomplished by contract or as a municipal service may include a requirement that all or any portion of the solid waste—except recyclable materials and materials that are processed at a resource-recovery facility at the capacity in operation at the time the requirement is imposed—be delivered to a waste facility identified by the city. In a district or county where a resource-recovery facility has been designated by ordinance, organized collection must conform to the ordinance’s requirements. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 3. Cities are prohibited from establishing or administering organized collection in a way that impairs recycling. Further, cities must exempt recyclable materials from organized collection upon a showing by the person who generates the recyclables or a collector of recyclables that the materials are or will be separated from mixed municipal solid waste by the generator, separately collected, and delivered for reuse in their original form or for use in a manufacturing process. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subds. 1, 3. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subds. 25a, 31. Minn. Stat. § 116.06, subd. 22. It is not absolutely clear whether a city that decides to enter into an agreement for the collection of recyclable materials, including source- separated compostable materials, with one collector or an organization of collectors is required to comply with the procedural requirements in the organized collection statute. The answer likely depends on whether the definition of “solid waste” referenced in the organized collection statute should be interpreted to include recyclable materials. Waste Recovery Coop. of Minn. v. Cnty. of Hennepin, 475 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). The Minnesota Court of Appeals, in a published opinion, considered a similar issue of whether telephone directories, which were collected for recycling, were subject to a county’s designation ordinance requiring mixed municipal solid waste to be disposed of at a county-designated facility. The court of appeals concluded that the telephone directories did not meet the definition of mixed municipal solid waste or of solid waste because they were being collected for recycling in a “separate waste stream” and were not being “discarded” as solid waste. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 13 If a city is considering entering into an agreement for the collection of recyclable materials with one collector or an organization of collectors, it should consult its city attorney to determine whether it must follow the procedural requirements in the organized collection statute. B. Organized collection is generally optional Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 6. The organized collection statute provides that the authority to organize the collection of solid waste is optional and is in addition to authority governing solid waste collection granted by other law. The statute also provides that a city may exercise any authority granted by any other law, including a home rule charter, to govern collection of solid waste. A city would only be required to organize collection if the county in which it is located has by ordinance required cities within its jurisdiction to organize collection. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 4. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94. The Waste Management Act defines cities as “statutory and home rule charter cities authorized to plan under sections 462.351 to 462.364.” Therefore, both statutory and home rule charter cities may adopt organized collection using the procedures outlined in the organized collection statute. Jennissen v. City of Bloomington, 913 N.W.2d 456 (Minn. 2018). Clark v. City of Saint Paul, 934 N.W.2d 234 (Minn. 2019). Jennissen v. City of Bloomington, 938 N.W.2d 808 (Minn. 2020). The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that the Waste Management Act does not preempt home rule charter cities from regulating the process for organizing the collection of solid waste. Instead, the Supreme Court concluded that the Act establishes the minimum procedural requirements that cities must follow before adopting organized collection, and that home rule charter cities may be subject to additional procedural requirements, including those adopted through a citizen petition for a referendum or for a proposed charter amendment. C. Open collection versus organized collection: pros and cons 1. Open collection Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, June 2009. There are several frequently cited advantages of open collection: • Residents have more choice and are free to select a solid waste collector based on their preference. • There is a direct relationship between the solid waste collector and its customers. • There are minimal administrative costs for cities. • Smaller solid waste collectors are better able to enter the market in an open collection system by servicing a portion of city residents. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 14 Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, June 2009. In contrast, there are several frequently cited disadvantages of open collection: • Open collection generally results in a more expensive monthly cost for residents. • Multiple collectors mean more truck traffic and the resulting negative side effects, including the potential for added street maintenance costs, and increased vehicle noise and emissions, fuel consumption, and vehicle accidents. • There may be inconsistent charges for the same level of service in a city. • Cities have reduced ability to manage solid waste collection. 2. Organized collection There are several frequently cited advantages of organized collection: The Benefits of Organized Collection, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Feb. 2012. Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, June 2009. • The price paid by households in an organized collection system is generally lower per month for similar service levels than in an open collection system due to increased efficiencies from serving every household or business in the community or on a particular route. • Limiting the number of solid waste collectors allows cities to decrease the impacts of increased truck traffic, including the potential for added street maintenance costs, vehicle noise and emissions, fuel consumption, and vehicle accidents. • Cities have greater ability to manage solid waste collection and can establish service requirements. • Standardized service makes public education easier. • Cities’ ability to seek requests for proposals on a regular basis helps lower costs. Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, June 2009. In contrast, there are several frequently cited disadvantages of organized collection: • Households and businesses do not get to choose their collector. • Cities have greater administrative involvement and costs. • Small collectors have higher entry costs to get into the market and competitive opportunities are limited to contract openings. • The statutory requirements for switching from open collection to organized collection are time consuming and can be difficult politically. D. Procedural requirements for adopting organized collection Minn. Stat. § 115A.94. 2013 Minn. Laws ch. 45. There are several procedural steps a city must take before it is authorized to adopt organized collection of solid waste. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 15 See Appendix A, Organized Collection Flowchart. The Minnesota Legislature adopted significant changes to the organized collection statute in 2013 that were designed to simplify the process for adopting organized collection. Any city that has adopted organized collection as of May 1, 2013, is exempt from the new requirements. Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. 4. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94. The Waste Management Act defines cities as “statutory and home rule charter cities authorized to plan under sections 462.351 to 462.364.” Therefore, both statutory and home rule charter cities may adopt organized collection using the procedures outlined in the organized collection statute. Jennissen v. City of Bloomington, 913 N.W.2d 456 (Minn. 2018). Clark v. City of Saint Paul, 934 N.W.2d 234 (Minn. 2019). Jennissen v. City of Bloomington, 938 N.W.2d 808 (Minn. 2020). The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that the Waste Management Act does not preempt home rule charter cities from regulating the process for organizing the collection of solid waste. Instead, the Supreme Court concluded that the Act establishes the minimum procedural requirements that cities must follow before adopting organized collection, and that home rule charter cities may be subject to additional procedural requirements, including those adopted through a citizen petition for a referendum or for a proposed charter amendment. 1. Notice to public and to licensed collectors Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4d. Minn. Stat. § 331A.03. A city with more than one licensed collector must first give notice to the public and to all licensed collectors that it is considering adopting organized collection. State law does not specify how notice should be provided. The League recommends providing both published notice and individual mailed notice to each licensed collector. 2. Exclusive negotiation period with licensed collectors Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4d. After the city provides notice of its intent to consider adopting organized collection, it must provide a negotiation period that is exclusive between the city and all collectors licensed to operate in the city. This exclusive negotiation period must be at least 60 days, but it may be longer if the city chooses. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4e. Before the exclusive meetings and negotiation, participating licensed collectors and elected officials must meet and confer regarding waste collection issues, including but not limited to road deterioration, public safety, pricing mechanisms, and contractual considerations unique to organized collection. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4d. A city is not required to reach an agreement with the licensed collectors during this period. The purpose of the exclusive negotiation period is to allow the licensed collectors an opportunity to develop a proposal in which they, as members of an organization of collectors, will collect solid waste from designated sections of the city. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 16 Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4d. The proposal must contain identified city priorities, including issues related to zone creation, traffic, safety, environmental performance, service provided, and price, and must reflect existing collectors maintaining their respective market share of business as determined by each hauler’s average customer count during the six months before the beginning of the exclusive negotiation period. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4d. If an existing collector opts to be excluded from the proposal, the city may allocate its customers proportionally based on market share to the participating collectors who choose to negotiate. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4d. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd 4c. LMCIT staff can assist in reviewing city contracts, especially provisions related to insurance and liability. For more information, contact Chris Smith, Risk Management Attorney, at csmith@lmc.org or 651-281-1269. If an organized collection agreement is established as a result of the exclusive negotiation period, the initial agreement must be in effect for seven years. Upon execution of an agreement between the participating licensed collectors and the city, the city shall establish organized collection through appropriate local controls. The city does not need to establish a solid waste collection options committee if it reaches an agreement with the licensed haulers during the exclusive negotiation period; however, the city must first provide public notice and a public hearing before officially deciding to implement organized collection. Organized collection may begin no sooner than six months after the effective date of the city’s decision to implement organized collection. 3. Solid waste collection options committee Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 subd 4a. Minn. Stat. ch. 13D. If a city does not reach an agreement with its licensed collectors during the exclusive negotiation period, it may form by resolution a “solid waste collection options committee” to study additional methods of solid waste collection. The city council appoints the committee members. The committee is subject to the open meeting law and has several mandatory duties. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4b. First, the committee shall determine which methods of solid waste collection to examine, which must include at least three methods of collection: (1) the existing system of collection; (2) a system in which a single collector collects solid waste from all sections of the city; and (3) a system in which multiple collectors, either singly or as members of an organization of collectors, collect solid waste from different sections of the city. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4b. Second, the committee shall establish a list of criteria on which the organized collection methods selected for examination will be evaluated, which may include: costs to residential subscribers; the impacts on residential subscribers’ ability to choose a provider of solid waste service based on the desired level of service, costs, and any other factors; the impact of miles driven on city streets and alleys and the incremental impact of miles driven by collection vehicles; initial and operating costs of implementing the solid waste collection system; providing incentives for waste reduction; RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 17 impacts on solid waste collectors; and other physical, economic, fiscal, social, environmental, and aesthetic impacts. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4b. Third, the committee shall collect information regarding the operation and efficacy of existing methods of organized collection in other cities and towns. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4b. Fourth, the committee shall seek input from, at a minimum: • The city council. • The city official responsible for solid waste issues. • Persons currently licensed to operate solid waste collection and recycling services in the city. • City residents who currently pay for residential solid waste collection services. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4b. Finally, the committee must issue a report on its research, findings, and any recommendations to the city council. 4. Public notice and public hearing Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4c. A city council shall consider the committee’s report and recommendations. A city must provide public notice and hold at least one public hearing before deciding to implement organized collection. 5. Implementation Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4c. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 3. A city can begin organized collection no sooner than six months after the effective date of the city’s decision to implement organized collection. A city may organize collection as a municipal service where city employees collect solid waste from a defined geographic service area or areas. In the alternative, cities may organize collection by using one or more private solid waste collectors or an organization of collectors. An agreement with private collectors may be made through an ordinance, franchise, license, negotiated or bidded contract, or by other means. 6. Anticompetitive conduct Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 7. A city that organizes collection is authorized to engage in anticompetitive conduct to the extent necessary to plan and implement its chosen organized collection system and is immune from liability under state laws relating to antitrust, restraint of trade, and unfair practices, and other regulation of trade or commerce. RELEVANT LINKS: League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 18 7. Joint liability limited Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, subd. 4f. Minn. Stat. § 604.02. An organized collection agreement must not obligate a participating licensed collector for damages to third parties solely caused by another participating licensed collector, notwithstanding section 604.02 of the Minnesota Statutes. The organized collection agreement may include joint obligations for actions that are undertaken by all the participating collectors. V. Conclusion Cities have broad authority to regulate the collection and disposal of solid waste. Cities exercise this authority subject to state and county oversight. Cities should work closely with their city attorneys when exercising this authority by requiring licenses, imposing fees and assessments, entering into contracts, and adopting ordinances. Cities must comply with procedural requirements in the organized collection statute before they may adopt organized collection of solid waste. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 8/3/2023 City Solid Waste Management Page 19 After city council provides public notice and holds a public hearing, it decides to implement organized collection. Organized collection may begin no sooner than six months after the effective date of the city council’s decision to implement organized collection. City council implements organized collection according to the agreement. Organized collection may begin no sooner than six months after the effective date of the city council’s decision to implement organized collection. City council approves proposal and decides to implement organized collection. Any initial agreement reached must be in effect for seven years. City council decides not to implement organized collection. Appendix A: Organized Collection Flowchart City council considers the report. City council decides not to implement organized collection. The committee studies organized collection and issues a report with its findings and recommendations. City council rejects collectors’ proposal. City council provides notice of its intent to consider organized collection to the public and to all licensed solid waste collectors. City council provides public notice and holds a public hearing on the proposal. City council adopts a resolution to establish a committee to identify, examine, evaluate, and seek input regarding various methods of organized collection. The committee is subject to the open meeting law. Collectors do not reach an agreement. Collectors reach an agreement and provide city council with a proposal for organized collection. City exclusively negotiates with its licensed collectors for at least 60 days to see if an agreement for organized collection can be reached. Before exclusive negotiations begin, elected officials and participating licensed collectors must meet and discuss waste collection issues, including, but not limited to: road deterioration, public safety, pricing mechanisms, and contractual considerations unique to organized collection. Appendix B Transporta�on Commission Report October 28, 2021 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Transportation Commission Date: October 28, 2021 Amended: December 16, 2021 To: Mayor and City Council Cc: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner From: Transportation Commission Subject: Organized Trash Collection Initiative Investigate the impacts of organized trash collection while considering the travel demand management objectives, environmental goals, and reducing wear-and-tear on City streets. Recommendation The Transportation Commission believes that there is sufficient evidence to support moving forward with establishing organized trash collection in Edina and recommends that City Council direct staff to create a plan to establish organized trash collection, including determining staffing/administrative costs, timeline and a communication plan to educate the community and solicit public input. Background In organized trash collection (OTC), waste hauling services are organized by local government to achieve benefits for residents. This does not mean a city has just one hauler. Typically, OTC includes a consortium of garbage haulers who may contract with a city; wherein each hauler is assigned a geographic area equal to their market share. In Minnesota, all haulers are legally allowed to negotiate and contract with a city under MN Statute 115A.94. This statute would require Edina to engage in contract negotiation with all current haulers leaving no option for one city-wide hauler. Benefits 1. OTC significantly reduces miles traveled by each hauler contributing to both environmental, quality of life, traffic safety, and economic benefits (meaning lower costs for the residents and the city). 2. For Edina specifically, OTC aligns with the broader sustainability goals within the Transportation Chapter of the Edina Comprehensive Plan (mainly goals 3, 9 and 14) along with the Climate Action Plan and Living Streets Plan. Current State The City of Edina has an open trash collection system in which residents choose from 6 city-licensed haulers for garbage collection. The summarized problem and opportunity are: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 1. Problem: Open collection systems result in high truck traffic where Edina residents may experience a range of 6-9 garbage trucks traveling their street on a single day. 2. Opportunity: Reducing this type of traffic to just one garbage truck on a single day (once per week) would significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions, street maintenance costs, and improve neighborhood safety and livability. Rationale for Recommendation: Data for this report was largely cited from the 2021 Quality of Life Survey Report, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) 2009 report, Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements, and 2012 report, The Benefits of Organized Collection. Additional research support came from Minnetonka High School’s advanced professional studies program VANTAGE - an academic program led by students to help solve real-world business problems via hands-on learning and project-based assignments. Lastly, City Staff from Richfield and Bloomington provided input on their OTC transition process. Resident Support In the 2021 Quality of Life Survey Report, residents were asked to rate the overall quality of garbage collection in Edina as well as the subsets of recycling, and organic recycling. (Question 14): 87% of residents gave excellent or good ratings in the overall quality of garbage collection 83% of residents gave excellent or good ratings for recycling 78% of residents gave excellent or good ratings for organics recycling (City of Edina, 2021, p. 28) From this data, it is evident that Edina residents are comfortable with organized collection systems as both recycling and organics recycling services are organized collection systems run by the City of Edina. Each service has one city-contracted vendor. Both are exempt from Statute 115A.94 (Minnesota Legislature, 2021). When looking at the organics recycling ratings by year, it suggests that Edina residents prefer an organized system: In 2021, 78% of residents gave excellent or good ratings for organics recycling In 2019, 52% of residents gave excellent or good ratings for organics recycling (City of Edina, 2021, p. 53) In early 2020, Edina converted to a city-wide, organized organics collection system. (Wig, 2019) Residents were also asked, ‘to what extent do you support the City changing from the current system in which residents may choose from several different haulers to a system where The City chooses one hauler for the whole community?’ (Question 31): Please Note: This question states one hauler for the whole community and does not include the option for multiple vendors with a designated geography according to market share. The City choosing one hauler is not an option under MN Statute 115A.94. Page 3 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 53% of residents were strongly or somewhat supportive of changing to OTC, a slight increase from previous years. (City of Edina, 2021, p. 30) When responses were analyzed by length of residency and age (City of Edina, 2021, p. 165): Length of Residency Age ≤ 5years 63% 18‐34 58% 6‐20 years 59% 35‐54 62% ≥ 20 years 41% 55+ 45% Key interpretive factor: The results from Question 31 are without any public education on OTC prior to the survey distribution. The Transportation Commission suggests if Edina residents had been educated on the environmental and economic benefits of OTC, or if they knew their rates could be lower and have guaranteed fewer garbage trucks on their street, the results of this survey question would be significantly more in favor of OTC. Greater Community Support ETC and EEC commissioners connected with City Staff in both Richfield and Bloomington to get a better understanding of the transition and implementation process. Richfield’s OTC starts October 2021, and Bloomington’s started October 2016. Their experiences were dissimilar in that Bloomington was in a four- year court battle to bring OTC to the ballot. In November 2020, OTC went up for vote where 70% of residents voted to continue the organized collection system (Hanks, 2020). Richfield had some resistance with residents not wanting to switch providers but experienced nothing like Bloomington. Both projected that as OTC continues to grow in the metro, the process will become easier as haulers are used to it. This could be true for Edina as 4 of 6 haulers already participate in OTC in other cities. Suburban Waste Service is the only hauler that participates in Haulers for People’s Choice, an organization that opposes OTC. Other take-aways from these meetings include: Bloomington gets fewer complaints with OTC. o The City does the billing through Utilities and fewer mistakes are made. o Missed pick-ups are less frequent as haulers must stop at every house in their zone. o There’s an accountability process and centralization for complaints not found in open systems. o Haulers are bound by service standards in their city-contract. Suggestions from Bloomington and Richfield City Staff: o Keep the public informed with mailers, newsletters, create an e-subscribe system just for garbage and recycling. o Know what haulers are charging in the open system before contract negotiations. Full notes from these meetings can be found in Appendix A and Appendix B. Page 4 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Economic Benefits Savings for Residents: With OTC, customers pay a flat rate based on garbage volume - a pricing system that has widely shown to reduce costs for customers. In the table below, the MPCA report shows that Open MSW (Municipal Solid Waste) has significantly higher rates than Organized MSW (MPCA, 2012, p. 1). With open systems, haulers may have a range of rates for identical, base service plans. Richfield found hauler billing rates fluctuated between $200- $1000/year. They also discovered that many residents with the largest can size (95 gallons) were being charged less than residents with smaller can sizes; hence, why some residents saw their rate increase with OTC. On average, residents are now saving around 15% (see Appendix A). The table below shows the OTC pricing schedule for Richfield. Open rates in Bloomington averaged $26.72/month before OTC (see Appendix B). The table below shows the OTC pricing schedule for Bloomington. Savings for the City: Edina is responsible for maintaining 27 million square feet of pavement with maintenance costs estimated to be $5 to $9 per square foot over a 60-year life span (City of Edina, 2021, p. 2). Based on axel load data, MnDOT formulates that the impact from a single garbage truck equates to the impact of 1,000 cars. 86% of road wear in alleys and 8% of road wear in high traffic areas comes garbage trucks (MPCA, 2012, p. 1). As city streets last 5-10 years longer with an organized trash system (MPCA, 2009, p. 40), optimizing garbage routes would significantly reduce both the miles traveled and the quantity and frequency of trucks Page 5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 on residential streets and alleys ultimately reducing the need for maintenance and maintenance costs. Within the rankings of Quality of City Services in the 2021 Survey, Street Repair was found to be of ‘lower quality’ compared to other city services with 57% believing the service was excellent or good (City of Edina, 2021, p. 27). Environmental Benefits Edina’s Climate Action Plan goals include reducing citywide greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025, and 80% by 2050 (City of Edina, 2021). Garbage trucks average 3-5 miles per gallon and reducing the miles traveled reduces greenhouse gases. Open cities studied in the MPCA 2009 report and compiled in the MPCA 2012 report (pg. 2) show the percentage of additional fuel used per year than if these cities were in an organized system. Eagan 216% Duluth 294% Rochester 250% Woodbury 355% St. Paul 437% Converting fuel usage to carbon emissions, the City of St. Paul, alone, could have saved an estimated total annual 2,470,664 pounds of CO2 if they were in an OTC system (MPCA, 2009, p. 144). In relatable terms, this amounts to: 2,816,476 miles traveled by an average passenger vehicle, or 45,813 propane cylinders used for home barbeques (Environmental Protection Agency, 2021). St. Paul officially started OTC in October 2018, but the decision to do so without a vote was brought to court where it was ruled that OTC should be brought to ballot. In November 2019, 63% of residents voted to keep OTC. (Walsh, 2019). Key fact: Both St. Paul and Bloomington had an established OTC before it went to ballot. After residents in these cities experienced the benefits of OTC, the majority voted to keep it. Additionally, Hennepin County requires garbage trucks to deliver trash to the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC) for cities with OTC. This means that garbage refuse will go to a waste to energy facility where garbage metrics can be easily tracked. In an open system, the hauler can choose any landfill. According to Hennepin County: “Every ton of trash burned at HERC produces fewer tons of greenhouse gas emissions than if it were disposed of in a landfill because decomposing garbage in landfills produces methane. Methane is over 20 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over 100 years” (Hennepin County, 2021). Page 6 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Traffic Safety In May of 2021, the City installed a camera at the intersection of West Shore Dr and Dunberry Ln to collect traffic data on garbage pick-up day. This is the corner of two minor residential streets, which do not have pass-through traffic, i.e., garbage trucks at this corner are serving the residences in the neighborhood. Staff calculated the percentage of vehicles observed: garbage trucks, school buses, other large vehicles, and regular passenger vehicles. 50 garbage trucks were recorded at this intersection on one pick-up day: Depending on the structure of the organized collection system, the number of trash trucks could be reduced to 3; 94% of the garbage truck traffic is potentially unnecessary. Other Considerations: Due to the size and frequent stops of garbage trucks, reducing the quantity of trucks on any given street fosters safer travel for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorized vehicles alike. When one hauler services every house on a street, truck speeds are reduced, and stops are more predictable. Page 7 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 References Bloomington. (2021, October 4). Garbage and recycling. Retrieved from Bloomington MN: https://www.bloomingtonmn.gov/ub/garbage-and- recycling City of Edina. (2021, October 4). 2021 Quality of Life Survey. Retrieved from City of Edina: https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11232/2021-Quality-of-Life-Survey-PDF City of Edina. (2021, October 4). Climate Action Plan. Retrieved from Better Together Edina: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/climate-action-plan City of Edina. (2021, October 4). 5. Transportation. Retrieved from Edina Comprehensive Plan: https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/8111/05-Transportation-Chapter-PDF City of Edina. (2021, October 4). Living Streets Plan 2015. Retrieved from City of Edina: https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1199/Living-Streets-Plan-PDF?bidId= Dunbar, E. (2019, June 5). When Minnesota cities take over trash collection, they take heat. But sometimes it pays off. Retrieved from MPR News: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/06/05/minnesota-cities- organized-trash-pickup-see-lower-costs-controversy Environmental Protection Agency. (2021, October 4). Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. Retrieved from United States Environmental Protection Agency: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas- equivalencies-calculator Hanks, M. (2020, November 18). Bloomington's ballot questions feature wild outcomes. Retrieved from Sun Current: https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_current/free/bloomingtons-ballot-questions- feature-wild-outcomes/article_b05e6342-1e4f-11eb-bd2f-37b673ab28ed.html Hennepin County. (2021, October 4). Hennepin Energy Recovery Center. Retrieved from Hennepin County Minnesota: https://www.hennepin.us/your-government/facilities/hennepin-energy-recovery-center Minnesota Legislature. (2021, October 4). Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Retrieved from Minnesota Legislature: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/115A.94 MPCA. (2009). Analysis of Waste System Collection Service Arrangements. Retrieved from Pollution Control Agency: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/w-sw1-06.pdf MPCA. (2012). The Benefits of Organized Collection. Retrieved from Pollution Control Agency: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/leg-12sy1-06.pdf Richfield. (2021, October 4). Organized Collection. Retrieved from Richfield: https://www.richfieldmn.gov/residents/sustainability_recycling/organized_collection.php Walsh, J. (2019, November 6). St. Paul voters say yes to city's trash collection system. Retrieved from Star Tribune: https://www.startribune.com/st-paul-trash-vote-in-hands-of-voters/564537512/ Page 8 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Wig, A. (2019, April 4). Organics Recycling Coming to Edina Next Year. Retrieved from Sun Current: https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_current/community/organics- recycling-coming-to-edina-next-year/article_ec2307b2-5573-11e9-b2e6- 2f28030f5c37.html Page 9 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 APPENDIX A: Meeting with City of Richfield, 8/27/21 Rachel Lindholm, Richfield Sustainability Coordinator Commissioners present: Jill Plumb-Smith, ETC; John Haugen, EEC Current Haulers: Aspen, Republic, Waste Management Primary motivations to switch to OTC - Equity, Sustainability, Quality of Service o Equity: Residents were paying different rates for the same service. Through an invoice request via Richfield’s Facebook page, it was found that yearly rates differed from $200- $1000 for the same service. ~100 invoices were received. In many cases, residents with 95-gallon containers were paying less than residents with smaller containers. o Sustainability: Richfield launched an organics drop-off program that became so popular residents requested curbside pick-up. Also, residents were dumping bags of household trash and household items around town. The problem needed to be systemically addressed. o Quality of Service: The City was receiving complaints regarding missed pick-ups, incorrect billing, and poor customer service. With an open system, the complaint is filed to the license where it may or may not be addressed by the hauler. In an OTC system, there is a better accountability for complaints. Hauler and Resident Feedback o Most of the hauler feedback was positive or neutral. They were used to it. Republic, Aspen and Waste Management had done it for other cities. There was some push-back during price negotiations, however. o A contingency of Hands-Off Our Cans and Haulers for Choice expressed that government regulation wasn’t necessary and infringed on residents right to choose. Both groups were much less vocal than they were with Bloomington’s OTC conversion. o Resident feedback was largely positive. Some were reluctant to the change as they had the same hauler for years and didn’t want to switch. There was also a perception that the pricing would go up and level of service would go down. Establishing OTC o Followed the requirements of State Statute 115A.94 where city must work with all haulers who want to participate o Get market share data from haulers – 6 months prior data o Negotiated terms of 7-year contracts o Took about 6 months to negotiate contracts Outcomes o OTC begins October 4th, 2021 o Prices lowered for all trash container sizes: 95 gal, 65 gal, 35 gal o 70-80% of residents will be paying less Page 10 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 APPENDIX B: Meeting with City of Bloomington, 9/15/21 Laura Horner, Bloomington Project Coordinator Andrew Scipioni, Edina Transportation Planner Commissioners present: Jill Plumb-Smith, ETC; Kirk Johnson, ETC Current Haulers: Aspen, Republic, Vierkant, Waste Management, Netti, Randy’s (since acquired by Republic) Motivation for moving to OTC o A group of Master Recyclers wrote a Citizens Request Letter to the City and laid out the benefits of OTC. Based on the letter, the City took formal action. o Hired Foth Consulting to create a more sustainable solid waste management plan. Recommendation was to move to OTC. Resident Feedback History o On October 2014, the process to move to OTC had begun. o A loud and vocal minority created a group call Hands Off Our Cans. The group started a petition and gathered the required number of signatures for OTC to go to ballot. o City Attorney believed a vote was not the right avenue to take and rejected the petition o The group filed a lawsuit against The City where it remained in the courts for 4 years. The State Supreme Court made the final ruling and determined that OTC should go to ballot. o A sustainability commission put together a public education website to talk about the advantages of OTC, in addition to going door to door and posting signs to educate residents. o In the November 2020 election, 70% voted to keep OTC. The program had been successfully running for 4 years. Establishing OTC o The City sent a survey requesting residents to mail in invoices with current rates. ~300 invoices were received. The overall average biweekly rate was $26.72. Under OTC and a contracted rate its $18.50. o Following Statute 115A.94, all haulers were allowed to bid and follow the negotiation process. Each hauler retained their same market share. o Negotiations required significant City Attorney time. Many committees were formed on a city level: A Solid Waste Working Group comprised of council members, the city manager and public works director plus public program coordinators. Others included a communication committee, a cart roll-out, committee, a legal and contract committee and an outreach community. o Bloomington does all the billing so Utility Billing software needed to be upgraded. This was considered a benefit for the haulers as The City handles the billing process. It’s more accurate and they get fewer complaints. o Total time estimated to establish an OTC system – 2 years o Organized organics collection starts in March of 2022 Comments from Bloomington about Richfield’s conversion o Haulers were not as concerned about the process of moving to OTC. They had done it before. o Bloomington was a bigger system and had established a more-clear path for Richfield. Key suggestions for other cities moving forward with OTC o Go into it with eyes wide-open and message that to the residents. Page 11 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 o Keep the public informed with info mailers, newsletters, create an e- subscribe system just for garbage and recycling o Know what haulers are charging in the open system o Ask haulers where they are currently dumping o Hennepin County ordinance requires haulers in OTC systems to use HERC facilities. This means that all refuse goes from waste to energy where garbage metrics can be easily tracked. In an open system, the haulers can choose any dump or landfill which makes tracking waste metrics much harder. Page 12 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 APPENDIX C: Energy and Environment Commission meeting minutes regarding first draft of OTC report, 9/9/21 Commissioner Haugen introduced the draft organized trash collection report from the Transportation Commission for comment. EEC comments include: o The state statute regarding requirement to keep number of haulers should be researched to figure out parameters, and make sure there is a proper system in place for bids if hauler shares are to be kept? We want to reduce emissions, but also keep cost down for residents. o The final report should clarify and define meaning of organized trash collection. o What does transition period look like for customers in Edina who must change their hauler? o If they’re not getting choice for vendors, customer service cannot drop and residents need to save money. o Could city elect to have fewer licensed haulers than six? o How does price reduction work for residents? Costs should be kept down for residents. o Why can’t we have one vendor for trash like recycling and organics? o What can City do to ensure quality of service doesn’t diminish if residents are unhappy with new vendor? o Quality of Life survey respondents show majority support for this, higher level than before. EEC moved to support this report. All members in attendance voted in favor, with the Commission’s comments considered for the final report. Appendix C Leter from Suburban Waste Services November 2, 2021 November 2, 2021 Andrew Scipione Transportation Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Dear Andrew, On September 1, 2021, city staff provided me with a draft copy of a recommendation for government organized trash collection from the city’s Transportation Commission. On September 28, 2021 an updated draft copy of the same document was approved at the Transportation Commission and sent off to city staff. I have been told that staff will assemble the information and present their findings to the City Council for their recommendation. As a longtime licensed solid waste hauler in your community, my concern is that the report is improperly being framed as a factual analysis. A closer review shows that it is primarily an opinion based report that is unsupported by fact. The limited information that is cited is at best outdated, inapplicable, or unscientific in method or presentation. I have attempted to address some of these concerns with the Transportation Commission at multiple meetings with little interaction. If this issue is to be elevated to the City Council for review, I feel that information must be current, applicable to the issue, and scientific in collection and presentation. I would like to touch upon some issues in the report that require further review or are in conflict with current information. Number of Solid Waste Trucks In the Background section of the report, page 1, paragraph 1, it states that residents may have 6 to 9 solid waste trucks traveling their streets in a single day. As there is no data to support this claim, it requires further analysis. While there are six licensed residential haulers in the city, a residential license is only required to collect residential solid waste. No residential license is required for a hauler to drive on any street within the city limits either passing through town or to collect commercial solid waste, which would require a commercial license. On the six days per week that a neighborhood would not have residential solid waste collected, there still may be a significant number of solid waste vehicles. Some of those vehicles may not have any business in the city, but may be either transiting through, servicing commercial customers, or may be servicing customers in a neighboring city. Significant Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions In the Background section of the report, page 1, paragraph 1, it states that reducing solid waste truck traffic would “significantly” reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Several additional steps need to be addressed in the report before a determination of “significant” reduction can be stated. Most critical, is an agreed upon definition of what “significant'' actually is. If a 50% reduction in greenhouse gasses is realized, likely all parties would agree that this is significant. Likely the reduction would be more modest and may not even exceed 5%. Reductions would likely be minimal due to a number of reasons. The city is only able to regulate solid waste vehicles actually servicing residential properties as previously discussed. In addition, the solid waste trucks in use today are some of the cleanest burning vehicles on the road today due to the industry conversion to compressed natural gas. Comparing a 50% reduction in solid waste trucks is significantly different than a 50% reduction in school district buses for example. Solid waste trucks in the Twin Cities are relatively newer in age and burn cleaner compressed natural gas vs. school district busses which are older and burn diesel fuel. Solid waste trucks service a neighborhood only on collection days, 52 days per year. School buses service a neighborhood at least 165 days per year, twice per school day, and for each school (elementary, middle, and high schools), for roughly 1000 trips per year. With all of the vehicle miles accumulating in the city within a year, it may be difficult to actually find a measurable reduction in greenhouse gasses for school buses with all of their trips, and if so, it likely would be impossible to measure the minute impact on reducing a few vehicle trips by solid waste vehicles. It should be noted that in the city’s 2021 Quality of Life Survey, page 60, 92% of residents rated the city’s air quality as Excellent or Good. Significant Reduction in Street Maintenance Costs In the Background section of the report, page 1, paragraph 1, it states that reducing solid waste truck traffic would “significantly” reduce street maintenance costs. The report references a City of Edina report from 2021 claiming that city streets will last 5-10 years longer with an organized trash system. While claims like this have been made by politicians in multiple cities, reductions in costs have never been realized and city streets simply do not have a 60-year lifespan. There is no known city that has actually reduced their street maintenance budget, reduced their maintenance schedules, or made any reduction in the property tax levy as a result of instituting government managed trash collection. In Maplewood, the city’s claim of a reduction in costs has never come to fruition. After government managed collection was instituted, theoretically saving the roads and reducing costs, the city instituted an additional utility franchise tax and increased property taxes for public works spending. In Bloomington, the public works director discounted the claim that government managed trash collection would reduce road maintenance costs. He stated, “The reduction of garbage trucks realized by organized collection… would not likely have a noticeable impact on actual safety or result in the need for less road maintenance.” In the five years since they instituted government managed trash collection, the city has not knowingly adjusted their maintenance program. In Fridley, the city claimed that road life was being reduced by 25%, a five year reduction on a twenty year road, due to the presence of extra garbage trucks. A professional government engineer who reviewed the report stated that the city lacked information to even conduct a reliable study due to an absence of knowledge of how most of their roads were initially constructed. He noted that their study assumed that trucks would be carrying a full load all the time, which did not reflect a real world scenario. In Roseville, the public works engineer debunked road wear and tear as being caused by solid waste vehicles or any other vehicles. He highlighted the problematic seal coating problem causing delamination, or a peeling away of the top layer of the road, as the culprit. In 2020, under direct questioning from city council members, the city engineer stated that there would be no savings in road maintenance due to a reduction in solid waste trucks on city streets. If Edina believes that there will be “significant” savings in road maintenance costs, the city should provide a detailed report identifying the actual savings and modification in street maintenance programs and budgets. The city should also identify the annual amount that the property tax levy will be reduced if a change in the system is adopted. Significant Improvement in Neighborhood Safety In the Background section of the report, page 1, paragraph 1, it states that reducing solid waste truck traffic would “significantly” improve neighborhood safety and livability. No factual information was provided to support these claims, likely because none exists. On the point of safety, there will likely be zero safety benefit, because in order for there to be a benefit, there must be a safety problem. In Edina, no safety problem is known to exist. In Bloomington, research showed that it would be impossible to reduce traffic accidents with solid waste trucks, because since 2004 (the start of electronically searchable records), there have been zero accidents. Research showed that the safety problem in Bloomington was actually a city problem. Since 2004, city vehicles crashed into three bicyclists, crashed into over 100 other vehicles, crashed while employees talked on the phone, rear ended vehicles at red lights, and even crashed city vehicles into employee personal vehicles. City vehicles drove off the road, crashed into overhead lights, and crashed into anti-terrorism barriers. For the report to stand on the claim that there would be a “significant” improvement of safety, a simple review of police department reports must be done at the very least. Perhaps as a comparison, the same review should also be applied to city vehicles, as was done in Bloomington. Furthermore, the report should also address the safety regulations that solid waste vehicle drivers must comply with, and compare this with the standards applied to the general public. Significant Improvement in Neighborhood Livability On the point of “livability”, the report claims that there would be a “significant” improvement without providing any explanation as to how this would be possible. In light of the city’s recent survey, it seems that a “significant” improvement is not only unlikely, but is probably impossible to achieve. In the city’s 2021 Quality of Life Survey, page 55, 95% of residents rated the city’s quality of life as Excellent or Good. The remaining 5% consisted of twenty-one people who rated it Fair, zero rated it as poor, and one said they did not know. Further review of survey questions on pages 56-61, addressing “livability” issues, highlights problems that have nothing to do with the solid waste industry. The survey, on page 56, states a concern of residents is the feeling of a “sense of community. On page 58, 11% feel somewhat unsafe in the greater Southdale area, and 38% do not believe the city is welcoming to those of lower income. On page 59, 7% state that traffic speed in neighborhoods is a major problem. It is indisputable that solid waste vehicles are some of the slowest traffic in neighborhoods as they are stopping at numerous residences. Perhaps livability can be improved, though not significantly, if the city were to address issues concerning sense of community, safety near Southdale, welcoming those of lower income, and the speed of traffic in neighborhoods. There is no evidence that reducing a few solid waste trucks one day a week will have any measurable impact in future survey results. Community Support The report’s use of aggregated data from the 2021 Quality of Life survey is misleading. The community survey does not support a recommendation to switch to government managed trash collection. On page 30 of the survey, figure 26, it states that 9 out of 10 have consistently given excellent or good ratings to the quality of garbage collection in the city. To reiterate, 90% are pleased with the service they are receiving from the hauler of their choice. When reviewing the specific survey question data on page 65, it reveals that 97% rated the quality of garbage collection in the city as excellent, good, or fair. The survey results clearly show that residents are highly satisfied with the hauler that they have selected. The report fails to acknowledge that this survey question exists. Instead, the report rests solely on page 30 of the survey, figure 27, which indicates that for the past three surveys, approximately half of residents stated that they would support a change to the selecting one hauler for the entire community. Relying upon this simple overview without reviewing the detailed data is problematic. When reviewing the detailed survey data on page 77, table 55, it states that strongly support is 20% and strongly opposed is 21%. These are the residents that likely cannot be swayed by any issues that might be raised, because their opinion is set. Those who state that they are somewhat supportive, 21%, somewhat oppose 15%, and don’t know, 23%, will be swayed by issues such as quality of service, hauler loyalty, value, support for local businesses. This constitutes the majority of city residents at 59%. Why those who are somewhat supportive, somewhat opposed, and don’t know, eventually change to strongly opposing government managed trash collection is due to factors that are not answered in citizen surveys. In New Hope, residents stated that they would support a single hauler if it was the hauler they were currently using. Others stated that they would be supportive if they could pick from one of three companies, or if only locally owned companies would service the city. Some senior citizen supporters also thought they could continue to share service with their senior citizen neighbor or have their grandson take their small trash bag once a month. When citizens realize that they may get a hauler they despise, may be forced to use a national company, will be prohibited from sharing, and will be forced to have service under a city contract, they quickly develop a strong opinion that is typically negative. Also in New Hope and in Shorewood, some environmentalists soon opposed government managed collection. They wanted to see a system where recycling was picked up weekly and trash was picked up biweekly. They wanted special cutting edge environmental solutions. A city contract is one size fits all, and does not support innovative options that one hauler may be able to provide to their customer base. Why one must combine the data in figure 26, 27, and the detailed data in table 55 in order to develop a true understanding of the opinion of the community, is likely partially due to the wording of the survey question which presents a scenario that would violate state law. There is no mechanism for the city to simply choose one hauler for the city. The process typically leads to a consortium where residents are forced to use a company which may or may not be one they wish to do business with. If the process eventually leads to a competitive bid, the city cannot simply choose the bidder that it likes or feels it has a personal relationship with. Economic Benefits The report’s claim that there will be an economic benefit by changing to government managed trash collection is highly flawed. It is solely based upon Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) data that is a decade old and unfortunately was collected in a completely unscientific manner. The now discredited MPCA report conducted a study based upon employees bringing in their solid waste bills, half coming from the City of St. Paul in Ramsey County. To put this in perspective, the Edina quality of life survey was based on 581 resident responses in a city of approximately 20,000 households. The MPCA’s survey was based on 151 resident responses in a state with 2,000,000 households or a metro area of 1,000,000 households. Scientifically conducted city surveys by professional companies such as Morris-Leatherman typically have 400-500 data points to be statistically accurate. Beyond the lack of data points, the MPCA survey was also flawed due to inaccurate analysis of data. Some bills included yard waste and others did not. No accounting was made for the different tax and tipping fees that change from county to county. For example, accurate comparisons cannot be made between an open market system in one county and government managed system in another when there is a 10% difference in the county’s tax rate. On the issue of the economic benefit and road maintenance, the report cites a second discredited document from the MPCA that includes a claim that a local university professor determined that a single garbage truck equates to the impact of 1000 cars. In the March 5, 2018 New Hope city council packet, the city manager reports contacting Dr. W. James Wilde P.E., who is erroneously credited with making the 1:1000 claim in the MPCA report. The city manager’s report states: In response to the inquiry from staff, Dr. Wilde stated, “about the question regarding 1 truck equivalent to 1,000 cars, I don't know where that one came from either, but it is quoted in the Foth report, published about 5 years before my report was finished. I quoted their report in mine.” Dr. Wilde is now teaching in Texas and is unable to attend a city meeting; however, did call city staff to discuss his model. He explained that in order to utilize the model, the city must collect and input data into a spreadsheet related to pavement structure, traffic, pavement condition, construction, cost, and additional heavy vehicle information. The goal of the spreadsheet is to provide information that will be helpful in making decisions related to roadways. As has been previously stated, no city has modified their street maintenance programs or found any other known measurable savings. Environmental Benefits The report states the lauded goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the city by 2025 and 2050, but fails to place any measurable number on how government managed trash collection would help achieve the goal. Claiming that any reduction in mileage by any amount will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, is an attempt to grossly oversimplify a complex issue. The report’s quote of an MPCA report from a decade ago, claiming a reduction of fuel by switching to an organized system, is completely inapplicable today. There has been a significant reduction in the number of providers in the solid waste industry due to the high costs of disposal, equipment, and human resources. In addition, most haulers in competitive open markets have switched from diesel to compressed natural gas for competitive and environmental reasons. The report provides no data to support any measurable greenhouse gas emission reduction or any measurable reduction in fuel consumption in a government managed trash collection system. Congestion Reduction It is puzzling how any report can call the installation of a video camera for one day at one intersection as any sort of analysis that passes even the lowest of scientific standards. How one can reach any conclusion is troubling. Setting aside the fact that one would need to analyze traffic from multiple intersections, one would also need to separate traffic that is the result of licensed residential activity vs. other activity. This single day study claims 50 garbage trucks were seen. No one has a clue how many were licensed, how many were servicing commercial properties, or how many were simply passing through to do business in another city. The report’s claim that 94% of the garbage truck traffic is “potentially” unnecessary is morally flawed. No city has provided any data to suggest that the reduction of a few solid waste trucks one day a week will provide any measurable reduction in traffic congestion. Actually if you use the city’s data from the study, it will show that if Organized Collection was implemented it would bring a .04% reduction in traffic at the same intersection. I don't think most people would think this is a measurable reduction in traffic congestion. Traffic Safety Benefits As previously stated, solid waste trucks do not present a safety hazard, therefore any reduction will not provide a safety benefit. The report is also morally flawed by citing statewide traffic accident statistics and deaths, and then implying that this is to be attributed to the solid waste industry. As was demonstrated in Bloomington and likely in Edina or any other city, an elimination of all city vehicles would result in 1000% improvement in pedestrian, cyclist, and motorized vehicle safety vs. eliminating all solid waste trucks. Input from Surrounding Communities The report’s attempt at gathering information from a city that has changed to government managed trash collection without gathering information from cities that rejected this option could be considered unbalanced or political in nature. A balanced and non-partisan report would gather information from cities that selected and rejected government managed trash collection. It would also conduct a review of the decision makers and their actions to address to what extent political viewpoints vs. public policy viewpoints were involved in the process. Conclusion I would request that the City look at all views of the Organized Collection process, and not only the input from the commission that looks at the data from a one sided perspective. Therefore, I would encourage the City to engage in an open process to explore all aspects of Organized Collection. 1. Meet with all of the haulers independently to identify concerns they have with the process and with the report. We care about providing great service to the residents of Edina and Organized Collection could drastically affect customers/residents. 2. Seek input from the public through an open house, public forums or other public input processes to gauge interest. 3. Create a report to the City Council that will take into account the perspective of all affected parties. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to working with the City of Edina and all interested parties. Thank you, Paul Rosland Suburban Waste Services cc: Scott Neal - City Manager Appendix D Staff Report December 21, 2021 December 21. 2021 Mayor and City Council Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Transportation Commission Report on Organized Trash Collection Background Organized collection is defined as a system for collecting waste in which one hauler or a consortium of haulers are authorized by a local government agency to collect from a defined geographic service area. In the City of Edina, recycling has been organized since 1989 and organics recycling has been organized since 2020. Solid waste collection is not organized; residents and businesses privately contract with one of six licensed haulers. Among the six neighboring cities, only Minnetonka and Eden Prairie also do not participate in organized trash collection. Transportation Commission Recommendation As part of their 2021 work plan, the Transportation Commission investigated the impacts of organized trash collection, specifically related to traffic, the environment and damage to roadways. The Commission reviewed existing City goals and objectives, analyzed the results of the City’s 2021 Quality of Life Survey, met with city staff from Richfield and Bloomington, and reviewed relevant resources prepared by various government and environmental agencies. As stated in their final report, “the Transportation Commission believes that there is sufficient evidence to support moving forward with establishing organized trash collection in Edina and recommends that City Council direct staff to create a plan to establish organized trash collection, including determining staffing/administrative costs, timeline and a communication plan to educate the community and solicit public input.” The Energy and Environment Commission reviewed and commented on a draft version of the report at their September 9 regular meeting and voted in support of it. Strategic Objectives Although organized trash collection is not specifically identified in the Comprehensive Plan, it relates to several objectives across multiple City departments; Travel Demand Management/Traffic Safety – The Commission contends that organizing trash collection would support the City’s travel demand management objectives by reducing traffic on local roadways. The Commission’s report references an intersection study at West Shore Drive and Dunberry Lane, where 50 garbage trucks were observed within a single day. This number included recycling and organics recycling REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 trucks in addition to garbage trucks, and is not truly representative of the percentage of traffic generated by garbage trucks. The same study found that a higher percentage of traffic was comprised of contractor/delivery/other large vehicles (95 vehicles or 8% of total traffic), and the vast majority (1,055 or 87% of total traffic) was comprised of regular passenger vehicles. While organized trash collection can reduce the number of garbage trucks on the roadways, it would be more effective to reduce the number of regular passenger vehicles (many of which have a single occupant). At this time, the City does not have sufficient evidence to suggest that accident rates are higher among garbage trucks than other vehicles. Sustainability/Climate Action – The Commission report also notes that organized trash collection supports the City’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and objectives in the draft Climate Action Plan (CAP). In the Waste Management chapter, one goal involves decreasing total per capita municipal solid waste handled 5% by 2030. As the Commission notes, Hennepin County currently requires haulers collecting from cities with organized collection to deliver solid waste to the Hennepin Energy Resource Center (HERC) rather than a landfill. This would not only reduce harmful emissions, but would provide the ability to better track tonnage and emissions. It is also worth noting that while the Commission recommends creating a plan to establish organized trash collection, the CAP recommends “exploring options for waste hauling improvements…including modifications to City’s existing licensure process and requirements as well as organized waste hauling strategies”. Economic Development – Locally-operated waste hauling services frequently express opposition to organized trash collection. Among their concerns is a fear of losing business to larger waste hauling businesses. The experiences of other cities provide some basis for this concern, and it is an important factor to consider given the Comprehensive Plan objectives to support locally-owned small businesses. Equity – In the City of Richfield, it was discovered that some residents were paying different rates for the same level of service. This disproportionally impacted residents that were elderly, on a fixed or low income, and those who’s native language was not English. While it is not known if this same problem is occurring in Edina, organizing trash collection may increase equity within the community through price transparency. Resident Support Since 2011, the City has included in its biennial Quality of Life Survey (QLS) questions about garbage collection. Between 2015 and 2021, an average of 87% of respondents gave good or excellent ratings to the quality of current garbage collection in Edina. Additionally, Question 31 asked respondents “to what extent do you support the City changing from the current system in which residents may choose from several different haulers to a system where the City chooses one hauler for the whole community?” Respondents have consistently been evenly divided on this question. In 2021, 53% of respondents (excluding Don’t Know responses) expressed support for a single-hauler system, a slight increase from previous years. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Figure 1 shows the distribution of responses to the same question including the Don’t Know responses. In total, 41% of respondents somewhat or strongly supported a single-hauler system, 36% somewhat or strongly opposed it, and 23% were uncertain of where they stood. This suggests that a significant portion of the community is unclear on what organized collection is or how it could impact them. The City may benefit from engaging in a broader community conversation on the subject, if only to obtain a clearer understanding of the specific questions and concerns residents may have. Procedural Requirements The Commission also noted in their report that the premise of Question 31 is not reflective of the legal process for organizing trash collection. First, the City would have to give notice to the public and all licensed haulers that it is considering adopting organized collection. From there, the City would enter into a negotiation period with the licensed haulers for at least 60 days. The goal of these negotiations is to create a proposal where each hauler is assigned a specific area of the City to collect from while maintaining their respective market share of business. Haulers may opt out from the proposal; the City would then reallocate their customers proportionately to the remaining participating haulers. If an agreement is reached as a result of negotiation, the City must again provide public notice and conduct a public hearing before officially deciding to implement organized collection. In this scenario, the initial agreement must be in effect for seven years. If the City were not to reach an agreement with the licensed haulers, it may form a solid waste collection options committee to study additional methods of solid waste collection. Members of the committee would Strongly Support 20% Somewhat Support21% Somewhat Oppose 15% Strongly Oppose 21% Don't Know 23% Figure 1. Question 31 Responses from 2021 Quality of Life Survey REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 be appointed by City Council and their meetings would be subject to open meeting law. The committee would have four primarily duties; 1. Determine which methods of solid waste collection to examine, which must include the existing system, a single-collector system and a multiple-collector system. 2. Establish a list of criteria on which the collection methods selected for examination will be evaluated. 3. Collect information regarding the operation and efficacy of existing methods of organized collection in other cities and towns. 4. Seek input from (at a minimum) City Council, the city official responsible for solid waste issues, licensed haulers and residents. The committee must then issue a report with its findings and recommendations to City Council. Again, the City must provide public notice and conduct at last one public hearing before deciding to implement organized collection. Cities can begin organized collection no sooner than six months after making the official decision. Cities have been met with varying levels of community opposition when attempting to regulate trash collection, including lawsuits in the Cities of St. Paul and Bloomington. Both of these lawsuits related to resident’s ability to petition for a ballot question in a home-rule charter city. Unlike St. Paul and Bloomington, Edina is a statutory city. Staff Recommendation At this time, staff does not support the Transportation Commission’s recommendation to move forward with organized trash collection in Edina. Without consensus from the public, the City’s efforts are better spent on other actions recommended in the Comprehensive Plan and Climate Action Plan related to traffic congestion, sustainability, economic development and equity. However, if Council wishes to move forward, it could consider; • Directing the City Manager to study the possible revision of Question 31 in future Quality of Life Surveys to accurately reflect the legal process for organizing trash collection. • Directing the City Manager to review staffing levels and administrative costs required if organized trash collection were to be implemented. • Hosting a community forum on organized trash collection, including licensed haulers, city staff and subject-matter experts from other cities. Appendix E Studying Organized Collec�on Memo January 20, 2022 1 220290 MEMORANDUM To: Chad Millner, Director of Engineering From: Dave Kendall and James Monge, City Attorneys Re: Studying Organized Collection Date: January 20, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ QUESTION PRESENTED What activities can a city engage in to study implementing organized solid waste collection without formally starting the statutory process for organized collection? DISCUSSION Cities in Minnesota must ensure that every residential household and business in the city has solid waste collection service. Minn. Stat. § 115A.941. Cities may provide for solid waste collection by using organized collection, city-provided collection, or requiring by ordinance that every household and business has a contract for collection services. Id. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 sets out the process for implementing organized collection. The Minnesota Supreme Court has recognized that Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 provides “municipalities with considerable flexibility, should they wish to explore organizing collection of solid waste.” Jennisen v. City of Bloomington, 913 N.W.2d 456, 462 (Minn. 2018). The statute neither requires nor prevents organized collection. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 subd. 6. Organized collection is optional. Id. Even if a city initiates a statutory process to implement organized collection, the city is not required to establish organized collection. Jennisen, 913 N.W.2d at 461. The City can terminate the process and choose not to proceed with organized collection. The city shall invite and employ the assistance of interested persons, including persons licensed to operate solid waste collection services in the city, in developing plans and proposals for organized collection and in establishing the organized collection system. Id. subd. 3(c). Nothing in Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 prevents a city from researching issues related to organized collection, including meeting with licensed collectors. The Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 process requires several steps before a city can organize collection. First, a city must meet and confer with participating licensed collectors. Id. subd. 4e. Second, a city with more than one licensed collector must provide a period of at least 60 days in which meetings and negotiations shall occur exclusively between licensed collectors and the city to develop a proposal in which interest licensed collectors, as members of an organization of collectors, collect designated waste from designated areas of the city. Id. subd. 4d. If an agreement cannot be reached after the exclusive negotiation period, and if the city is still 2 220290 interested in pursuing organized collection, then the city council must establish a solid waste collection options committee to identify, examine, and evaluate various methods of solid waste collection. Id. subd. 4a. The solid waste collection options committee issues a report with recommendations to the city council. Id. subd. 4b.The city council considers the report and recommendations of the solid waste collection options committee when deciding whether to implement organized collections. Id. subd. 4c. These steps are discussed in more detail below. Meet and Confer Period The city’s elected officials must meet and confer with participating licensed collectors regarding waste collection issues including but not limited to road deterioration, public safety, pricing mechanisms, and contractual considerations unique to organized collection before entering into exclusive meetings and negotiations with licensed collectors to develop a proposal in which interested collectors collect solid waste from designated sections of the city. Id. subd. 4e. There is no time limit on the meet and confer period and nothing locks the city into taking any further steps to implement organized collection beyond the meet and confer period. Exclusive Negotiation Period If the city is interested in implementing organized collection after the meet and confer period and the city has more than one licensed collector, the next step is to notify the public and all licensed collectors in the community and to provide a period of at least 60 days in which meetings and negotiations shall occur exclusively between licensed collectors and the city to develop a proposal in which interested licensed collectors, as members of an organization of collectors, collect solid waste from designated sections of the city. Id. subd. 4d. The proposal must include identified city priorities, including issues related to zone creation, traffic, safety, environmental response, service provided, and price, and shall reflect existing haulers maintaining their respective market share of business as determined by each hauler’s average customer count during the six months prior to the commencement of the exclusive negotiation period. Id. If the licensed collectors are unable to develop a proposal, or the proposal is not acceptable to the city, and the city is still interested in implementing organized collection, then the city must move to establish a solid waste options committee. Id. However, nothing in Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 prevents the city from abandoning the process for organizing collection at this point. Establish a Solid Waste Collection Options Committee The city council establishes the solid waste collection options committee by resolution to identify, examine, and evaluate various methods of solid waste collection. Id. subd. 4a. The solid waste collection options committee must determine which methods of solid waste collection to examine, which must include: (i) the existing system of collection, (ii) a system in which a single collector collects solid waste from all sections of the city, and (iii) a system in which multiple collectors, either singly or as members of an organization of collectors, collect solid waste from the city. Id. subd. 4b. The solid waste collection options committee shall establish a list of criteria on which the solid waste collection methods selected for examination will be evaluated, which may include: costs to residential subscribers, impacts on residential subscribers' ability to choose a provider of solid waste service based on the desired level of service, costs and other 3 220290 factors, the impact of miles driven on city streets and alleys and the incremental impact of miles driven by collection vehicles, initial and operating costs to the city of implementing the solid waste collection system, providing incentives for waste reduction, impacts on solid waste collectors, and other physical, economic, fiscal, social, environmental, and aesthetic impacts. Id. The solid waste collection options committee shall seek input from: (i) the city council, (ii) the city staff member responsible for solid waste issues, (iii) license collectors, and (iv) residents. Id. The solid waste options committee issues a report on the committee’s research, findings, and any recommendations to the city council. Id. The city council considers the report and recommendations of the solid waste options committee. Id. subd. 4c. Nothing in Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 obligates the city to implement organized collection at this point in the process. Jennisen, 913 N.W.2d at 461. Before implementing organized collection after either negotiation with licensed collectors or examination of solid waste collection by a solid waste collection options committee, the city must provide public notice and hold at least one public hearing. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 subd. 4c. Organized collection may begin no sooner than six months after the effective date of the city council’s decision to implement organized collection. Id. A city that follows the statutory process for organizing collection is immune from liability under state laws relating to antitrust, restraint of trade, unfair trade practices, and other regulation of trade or commerce. Minn. Stat. § 115A.94 subd. 7(a). CONCLUSION Studying organized collection, including having discussions with licensed collectors, will not lock the city into the statutory process outlined in Minn. Stat. § 115A.94. Even if the city starts the process for organizing collection under Minn. Stat. § 115A.94, it can choose to stop the process and not organize collection at any time. Appendix F Transporta�on Commission Advisory Communica�on January 20, 2022 Date: January 20, 2022 To: Mayor and City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: Organized Trash Collection Situation: The Edina Transportation Commission has completed its 2021 work plan item to determine the impacts of organized trash collection. In light of that work, the ETC has found significant potential benefit and recommended further study in order to obtain other necessary information including the perspective of the haulers and the public. Action Requested: The Commission recommends the City Council continue the investigation of organized trash collection consistent with the statutory requirements set out by the State of Minnesota. Background: This work plan item for the Transportation Commission was appropriately limited to investigating the impacts of OTC. More work needs to be done, including conducting public education, assessing costs and administration, and further engagement with the haulers. This information is necessary for the City Council to make a decision. Support: If the City Council agrees to continue the investigation of the viability of OTC, the Transportation Commission would support this process by participating in public education regarding OTC. Appendix G Transporta�on Commission Advisory Communica�on December 15, 2022 Date: December 15, 2022 To: Mayor and City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: 2023 Quality of Life Survey Question 31 Action Requested: The Transportation Commission emphatically recommends that the wording of Question 31 for the City’s 2023 Quality of Life Survey be corrected to accurately reflect the differences between organized and open trash collection systems. Below is an example wording: “Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection; an open system or an organized system. An open system means all haulers serve all areas, resulting in many garbage trucks on neighborhood streets on garbage day. An organized system means haulers are assigned to specific areas, resulting in only one garbage hauler on neighborhood streets on garbage day. To what extent do you support the City changing from the current open collection system to an organized collection system?” Appendix H Leter from Curbside Waste July 21, 2023 Subject: Counter Argument Against Organized Trash Collection in Edina, MN Dear Members of the City Council, I am writing this letter on behalf of Curbside Waste, INC., a local minority family-owned business since 2012. Our family has had numerous refuse businesses since the 1980's which have been passed down from generation to generation. Curbside Waste has been an integral part of the Edina community. As the proud owner of Curbside Waste, INC., I would like to respectfully express our concern regarding the proposal for organized trash collection and advocate for the opportunity to continue providing our essential services to the residents of Edina. For over a decade our family has been in business and dedicated to serving the waste disposal and management needs of the Edina community. We take immense pride in being a staple in your city, offering reliable and affordable trash hauling services that have garnered immense support from our neighbors. Recently, we were honored to receive the 2023 Neighborhood Fave award, a testament to the deep-rooted appreciation and trust that the locals have in our company. We firmly believe that the strength of our community lies in supporting local businesses, particularly minority-owned enterprises like ours. Our operations have not only provided gainful employment for local residents but have also allowed us to give back through various community initiatives and partnerships. The continuity of our business ensures the preservation of these contributions, fostering a strong sense of unity and cohesion among Edina's residents. Moreover, our personalized approach to waste disposal has enabled us to tailor our services to suit the unique needs of our customers. This level of care and attention sets us apart from larger, standardized waste collection entities. With us, residents have the assurance that their concerns will be heard, and their feedback will be implemented promptly. We understand that the proposal for organized trash collection aims to streamline waste management the autonomy small fa mily businesses but we nrmiy peneve tnat it is crucial to preserve autonomy and diversity of businesses like ours. By allowing Curbside Waste, INC., to continue its services, the City of Edina can uphold its commitment to supporting minority-owned businesses, fostering economic growth, and maintaining a strong sense of community pride. In conclusion, we kindly request that you reconsider the implementation of organized trash collection in Edina. MN. and erant Curbside Waste, INC., the opportunity to continue serving our beloved community. Our decade-long presence, the Neighborhood Fave award, and the overwhelming support of our neighbors are all indicators of our commitment and dedication to this city. We believe that by preserving the presence of family-owned minority businesses, Edina will flourish as a vibrant and inclusive community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Chad Master Owner, Curbside Waste, INC. a U OS tWAST:6 kJ c Po ,Box 3 OG1- Zookly.f)?-10,11,Ai 5512-13 MINNEAPOLIS MN 553 21 JUL 2023 PMS L A/ 4,4h, ehaD Aibid nergoBiva EPAKIVAI 55 L/39. S5439 - o Appendix I Notes from Licensed Hauler Discussions August 7 and 14, 2023 Organized Trash Collection (OTC) Licensed Hauler Discussion DATE/TIME: August 7, 2023 @ 1 PM Conference Room A, Public Works Facility & Virtual Teams Option ATTENDEES: Hauler Representatives • Paul Rosland, Suburban Waste Service • Deborah Gatz, Republic Services • Justin Vierkant, Vierkant Disposal • Jason Hartman, Waste Management • Emily Newcomber, Ridwell, Inc. • Thor Nelson, Aspen Waste Systems • Jenny Parkos, Curbside Waste • Stacy Sanders, Aspen Waste Systems • Chad Master, Curbside Waste • David Pool, Aspen Waste Systems City of Edina Staff • Scott Neal, City Manager • Chad Millner, Director of Engineering • Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager • Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner • Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist I/Recycling Coordinator • Twila Singh, Organics Recycling Coordinator • Courtney Roth, Community Health Intern • Heidi Blum, MN GreenCorps Member Other • John Haugan, Energy and Environment Commissioner INTRODUCTION: • Resident feedback (Quality of Life Survey) • Commission feedback • Council Feedback to Date • Climate Action Plan • Economic Development • Equity and Prices • Schedule/Next Steps DISCUSSION TOPICS: A. Initial Comments/Have you been part of organizing before? o Most haulers have been a part before in either St. Paul, Bloomington or Richfield o Republic: Richfield model is good (general agreement by haulers on this) because the city held each individual contract, City allowed more collaboration. o The consortium model is not preferred. St. Paul demanded this type of model. o City could “legally take our routes” after the first initial contract (HOW CAN WE NOT DO THIS?) City could do an RFP for 1 hauler city wide with the 2nd contract. o Concern about hauler consolidation over time. o Large haulers own landfills, which lowers their rates and makes it hard to compete for small haulers. o Concern about “admin overload” if haulers have to do “customized billing” – staff wonders, don’t they already have customized billing with customers receiving a variety of different rates? o SWS – opposed to OTC, small hauler, prides itself on service and choice, doesn’t want city to decide, doesn’t want to limit business opportunities or lose current customers. o Aspen – likes to compete on service. This would go away with OTC. Small haulers can’t go as low as big haulers on a citywide contract. St Paul went from 15 haulers to 6 – city requirements drove them out. The landfill and dumping costs are higher for small firms. The large ones may own the landfills. B. What are the impacts to rates? With other OTC, has it included properties up to a specific unit count? What would they be? o 1-4 units or properties with individual carts. If they have dumpster service, typically not part of OTC. o Richfield surveyed residents to estimate rates o Aspen says they studied this in St. Paul and found that the poorest neighborhoods had the lowest prices. They ask staff to refine any assumptions that there is an equity issue in current conditions. o Noted that Edina City Code requires, if requested, the haulers provide walk-up service. Walk-up service would be included in the contract. o Service standards are tough to include in contracts – damages leads to corrections? C. What would be the impacts on customer service? Is this more impactful to elderly or low-income customers? How about walk-up service vs. curbside service? o Staff wonders if residents have complained about OTC in other cities? o Small haulers feel they offer better service (Aspen, SW, Curbside) o Haven’t seen service standards in a contract that have been enforceable. o There is a worker injury risk with the high levels of service. i.e. hauler hand-throwing waste instead of using a picker may injure themselves. o Staff should investigate how much back door service is in place in Edina currently. o Edina gets the best drivers because our residents are generous (gifts / tips) o Standard pricing in St. Paul – they were actually shopping for service (what does this mean?) D. What would be the impact on vehicle miles traveled? Would it reduce? Ties directly to emissions. Do you know how many miles are traveled today on your routes in Edina? o SW says maybe small reduction 5-10%. Still running trucks 9 hours/day. o City would gain some efficiency organizing, but not as much as you’d think. o Garbage truck miles are a very small fraction of the overall miles traveled. o SW says OTC could impact noise and pollution concerns o Vierkant says they run ~400 hrs/qtr o Engine hours stay approximately the same. A better metric of emissions than miles in their opinion. E. What is your average truck fuel efficiency (3-5 miles per gallon?) Do you use compressed natural gas trucks? o Mix of truck fuels across haulers. Some CNG, no electric yet. No need for fueling stations in Edina for any kind of fuel. Big haulers have greater ability to switch truck fuel types. o Vierkant: 2-3 MPG, newer models are less efficient. o Haulers stated CNG trucks are less efficient then diesel. o If type of truck are specified in contract – larger haulers have an advantage o Electric trucks in New York City with some issues o 2 and 3-axle trucks are used with an extra pusher(?) for heavier weights o Trucks typically haul 10-tons when full. This takes approximately 500 homes and a full day to fill. Running partially full most of the day. F. How would OTC impact your revenue and expenses? o Not asked G. What is the average size, weight, and number of axles on your typical truck? What is the truck weight empty vs. full? Are they adding waste until max capacity? How many households per truck (500?) Who operates across city boundaries? o 3 axles or 2 with pusher o 10 tons weight when full o One trip to landfill per day o ~500 households per truck H. Any traffic safety stats? Are accidents in neighborhood common? Property damage or personal injury? o Staff to check PD reports for property or personal injury o Safety is a priority. CDL and drug testing required. Tough to find enough drivers. Walk-up service is hard on the body. o Haulers did not have data on safety. Rare case incidents happen. Smaller property damage occurs but not often. I. More or less waste after organizing? Are carts more or less tidy? Are customers recycling more or less after organizing? o Haulers say maybe more since the homes they serve change pre and post-OTC. Mostly don’t notice much change, though. o Haulers say they offer “unlimited service as far as how many carts are available” for recycling at least o They do not see any changes in recycling rates after OTC. Also don’t see any changes if recycling was offered every week. J. Where do you deposit waste? Will this change? Does it change? o County requires HERC disposal first, then at hauler discretion o City could require a location in the contract if there is space. Some are at capacity and not accepting more waste. K. What do you need from the city to be successful if OTC moves forward? o Haulers’ impression is that they receive zero complaints about service now, but complaints would go up with OTC. o There is a rapport between truck drivers and the residents they serve. o Staff rapport with haulers should be strong. “haulers should feel respected” o Haulers are concerned about council volatility, restricting contracts to fewer haulers in future years for instance. o Communication with and between haulers and residents is mandatory. This is a big political issue. o Haulers want 1 point of contact with the City. Some customers will pay more so haulers need support from the council. Council needs to respect the price negotiations that occurred before it went in front of them. o Can’t compare prices in a vacuum. Every community expects different levels of service. o Backdoor Service – what happens? This will drive up cost because each hauler does not know how many there will be. Residents will need to sign up With disability – haulers do it for free today Each city price is different o ASL Truck is faster and more automated. There are more injuries w/o automated trucks. Haulers are trying to go more towards automated vs rear loaders. They have limited options for drivers and ASL trucks are better for hiring. FOLLOW-UP MEETING DATE/TIME: August 14, 2023 @ 3 PM Virtual Teams Meetings ATTENDEES: Hauler Representatives • Matt Herman, Republic Services City of Edina Staff • Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist I/Recycling Coordinator • Twila Singh, Organics Recycling Coordinator • Chad Millner, Director of Engineering • Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager DISCUSSION TOPICS: Supports OTC - Small haulers are going to lose their business – it doesn’t remove their business – you have the business that you have. • 7-yr contract is more common – gives more time to finance more carts and other stuff • No consortium has un-winded thus far, consolidation occurs. • Provided small haulers an option to sell to someone or stay in the business. • Has never happened to go from multiple haulers to 1. Paid on customer service survey results Big haulers own landfills and always win in a bid scenario – feels this is not true. Residents like current haulers and do not want to change. People do not like changes. Backdoor service – “OTC would take it away”, not true it is still offered and it could be required in the contract. Not saving wear and tear on the streets – not a major issue Haulers won’t save money – reduce expenses – there is some savings by servicing a neighborhood instead of an entire city. 30-40 sec per stop – could be some saving by stopping at each house – laor hours – engine hours. Market favors active customers, there will be winner and losers Who are not active customers – people with language barriers or no time. Pricing has to make sense for the haulers – they work together to ensure all can do business with the offer back to the city or llc. Where does the waste go? When city becomes involved, it is supposed to go to a facility per state law. In most cases, HERC provides each hauler a quota – HERC would update the quotas and would be worked out in the contract and pricing would reflect that. What do you need to be successful? Richfield example, clear direction from City, enough time to do it, when developing pricing we need space to do the negotiations, State Law provides anti-trust protections. First haulers negotiate rates and then come back to the City. What does the City value and what does the City like to have? Republic collected data from haulers in Richfield to determine neighborhoods for each vendor. Perception that a vendor needs growth to survive vs running the existing Billing – Summary billing – does the city bill each customer? Or does the haulers bill each customer? Could have 4-5 service levels – walk-up versus automated and all between. EdinaMN.gov Organized Trash Collection Staff Report (Residential Collection) November 21, 2023 Chad Millner, Engineering Director (on behalf of a staff team) Organized Trash Collection (OTC) Staff and Commissions are seeking a direction / decision 1.Status Quo –stay as an open collection system 2.Begin the legal process to organize trash collection •Organized Trash Collection (residential service) is defined as a system for collecting solid waste in which a specified collector is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area. (Minn. Stat. 115A.92) •-Generally, a building up to 8 units. Procedural Requirements •If council directs staff to begin legal process for OTC 2013 Waste Management Act Very structured and defined process by state statute Very limited flexibility in the process •Resident calls of wanting to participate in a Public Hearing on the matter If council directs staff to begin legal process for OTC, Public Hearings are required Staff would create a BTE page Background •2021 ETC work plan initiative; •“Investigate the impacts of organized trash collection while considering travel demand management objectives, environmental goals and reducing wear-and-tear on City streets.” •Reviewed City goals/objectives •Analyzed Quality of Life Survey results •Met with Bloomington and Richfield staff •Reviewed relevant literature Background ETC Recommendation •ETC believes sufficient evidence to support moving forward with OTC •Recommends that City Council direct staff to create a plan to establish OTC; •Determine staffing/administrative costs •Timeline •Communication plan •EEC also voted in support of the ETC report, provided comments •ETC and EEC submitted additional advisory communications on this agenda Summary OTC not specifically mentioned in Comp Plan, Living Streets Plan -Briefly mentioned in Climate Action Plan •Sustainability/Climate Action •Equity •Quality of Life -Traffic Safety, Noise, Customer Service •Economic Development •Impacts to Roads •Staffing Summary Sustainability/Climate Action •Some reduction in fuel use and GHG emissions –incremental •Engine hours is better measure than vehicle miles •Engine is running all day whether within the whole city or within a portion of the city. Summary Equity •Mixed results –some reduction in cost and some increase in cost •Customers that call may often get better rates –intro pricing •More transparency in pricing Summary Quality of Life •Traffic Safety –no evidence of accidents or measurable safety issue •Potentially safer if less trucks travel a street •Noise –some reduction because less trucks travel the street •Customer Service –mixed, some better, some worse Summary Quality of Life Survey (QLS) –Resident Feedback •Since 2011, QLS has included questions about garbage collection •2015 –2023 –average of 87% gave good / excellent rating to quality of collection Summary Quality of Life Survey (QLS) –Resident Feedback •2023 QLS –ETC recommended changing the question wording and it was changed •Support to change to OTC –remove the ‘Don’t Know’ responses Summary Economic Development •Does not support City’s stated goal as it generally prevents or limits business growth. •Small sized and local haulers very concerned about being pushed out. Summary Impacts to Roads •Minimal –Roads are designed for the impacts of large vehicles Summary Staffing •Concerns from Commissions on how this was reported •Bloomington and Richfield •Have a dedicated staff member for OTC Recommended to have staff member onboard before legal process is started •Legal opinion –we can add a fee on the OTC contracts to cover a staff person •If opinion of Council is to start legal process for OTC, we would recommend adding a new staff member immediately Summary Hauler Feedback •General comments that OTC supports large more than small haulers •City could legally consolidate number of haulers after first contract •Smaller, more local haulers feel they will lose ability to provide unique service •May be difficult to detail and enforce customer service standards –open market, customers can change and find a different hauler. Procedural Requirements •City would give notice to public and licensed haulers •Enter negotiation period to create proposal •If agreement reached, public hearing held before final decision Initial agreement must take effect for seven years •If no agreement reached, City may form options committee Committee must issue report, City must hold public hearing before final decision •Organized collection can begin no sooner than 6 months after decision Organized Trash Collection (OTC) Staff and Commissions are seeking a direction / decision 1.Status Quo –stay as an open collection system 2.Begin the legal process to organize trash collection •Organized Trash Collection (residential service) is defined as a system for collecting solid waste in which a specified collector is authorized to collect from a defined geographic service area. (Minn. Stat. 115A.92) Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: IX.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review for 4600 West 77th Street Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested. Provide the applicant with non-binding feedback on a potential future land use application. INTRODUCTION: Seven Hills Academy on behalf of the property owner, Hillcrest Development, is requesting consideration of a Sketch Plan proposal to remodel and expand the existing office building at 4600 77th Street into a Kindergarten through 5th Grade Charter School (550 students). The expansion of the building would be for a gymnasium. This site is located within PUD-23, which includes The Fred apartment building (408 units), and the Finch apartments (276 units to be built) and this existing office building. The PUD Plan had contemplated retail uses within the first level of the 4600 building, with the idea that the retail uses would activate the area and woonerf between The Finch apartment and this office/retail building. The PUD-23 Ordinance was specifically written to allow “Retail uses allowed within the PCD-1 Zoning District.” The request would require the following: 1. An Ordinance Amendment to allow schools within this PUD-23 Zoning District. 2. A revised Overall Development Plan for P UD-23. 3. Site Plan and Setback Variance for the gymnasium from 45 feet to 37 feet and a drive aisle separation requirement from 10 feet to 0 feet for the parent drop-off drive aisle. 4. Likely variances would be requested for building material and building transparency for the gymnasium addition. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Memo to Planning Commission Applicant Narrative & Sketch Plans Site Location, Zoning & Comp. Plan Location Sketch Plan Review Presentation AFO Review (Mic Johnson) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: November 15, 2023 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 4600 77th Street West Seven Hills Academy on behalf of the property owner, Hillcrest Development, is requesting consideration of a Sketch Plan proposal to remodel and expand the existing office building at 4600 77th Street into a Kindergarten through 5th Grade Charter School (550 students). The expansion of the building would be for a gymnasium. This site is located within PUD-23, which includes The Fred apartment building (408 units), and the Finch apartments (276 units to be built) and this existing office building. The approved PUD-23 Plan had contemplated retail uses within the first level of the 4600 building, with the idea that the retail uses would activate the area and woonerf between The Finch apartments and this office/retail building. The PUD-23 Ordinance was specifically written to allow “Retail uses allowed within the PCD-1 Zoning District.” The request would require the following: 1. An Ordinance Amendment to allow schools within this PUD-23 Zoning District. 2. A revised Overall Development Plan for PUD-23. 3. Site Plan and Setback Variance for the gymnasium from 45 feet to 37 feet and a drive aisle separation requirement from 10 feet to 0 feet for the parent drop-off drive aisle. 4. Likely variances would be requested for building material and building transparency for the gymnasium addition. The table on the following page demonstrates how the buildings would comply with the PUD-23 zoning standards on the lot. Mic Johnson, AFO, Architectural Field Office has provided a review of the project. (See attached.) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table City Standard (PUD-23) Proposed (Measured from building to curb) Building Setbacks Front – 77th Street Side – East Side – West Rear – Fred Richards Park Drive aisle setback from building 40-50 feet 45 feet NA 20 feet 10 feet 50 feet 37 feet* 40 feet 100+ feet 0 feet* Building Height 5 stories & 52 feet 1 story – 35 feet Density NA NA Parking 1 space per staff, plus 1 space per 2 classes = 84 required Housing + coffee = 367 451 total 78 proposed 367 445* *Does not meet base Zoning Standards in the existing PUD Issues/considerations: Proposed Use. The existing office building where the school is proposed was intended to be used for retail uses and office when the PUD-23 was established. The zoning ordinance was amended to specifically allow “retail uses allowed with the PCD District.” A school was not anticipated. Therefore, a zoning ordinance amendment would be required with any formal application. Sale of Property to a Tax-Exempt Entity. This proposal creates a conflict with the 2014 TIF Master Agreement that is recorded on the land title. As a condition for designating the Pentagon Park office properties as eligible for Tax Increment Financing (TIF), the property owner agreed to only sell the property to entities that pay property taxes. It appears that the Applicant is exempt from property taxes. This sale would violate the terms of the TIF Master Agreement, unless that agreement is modified by the property owner, City, and Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA). City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Site Circulation (woonerf – west side of building). Staff is concerned about turning the proposed woonerf into a bus pick-up and drop-off area two times per day. The fire marshal has expressed concern about the potential for buses to block the one-way woonerf for emergency vehicles. Staff would recommend pavers be constructed within the woonerf and that it remains friendly to pedestrians and bikers. Site Circulation (Park entrance – east side of building). Staff also have concerns about the parent pickup and drop off area and the potential for stacking in to the entrance road to Fred Richards Park. Drive-aisle (parent drop off). The parent drop off and pick up drive-aisle would be located up against the gymnasium and would require a variance. (A 10-foot separation is required.) Park Entrance. The proposed gymnasium would partially block the view of the entrance in to the Fred Richards Park, as it would be setback just 20 feet from the paved portion of the roadway park entrance. Traffic and parking. A traffic and parking study would be required. Note the project is slightly short parked. Examination of the on-site circulation would be required as part of the study. Sustainability. The applicant would be required to meet the City’s sustainability policy for construction of the gymnasium as part of the PUD. The applicant has indicated that they do not intend to meet the policy and would be requesting that condition not be placed on them as part of the PUD revision. Flood Plain. A portion of the gymnasium addition would be located within the 100-year flood plain. This area would have to be mitigated on the site. Building material. The gymnasium as proposed would be concrete with very few windows. Variances would also be likely requested to the building material requirement for brick or stone. SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING 1 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL PREPARATORY ACADEMYS SEVEN HILL 4600 West 77th Street, Edina, MN Amendment to PUD-23 2 Understanding and Incorporating District Goals Unique Experiences Economic Vitality Goal #1: Offer unique experiences for living, playing, working and Learning, and memorable public places for civic and social gathering for multiple generations and diverse populations. Learning and Entertainment Economic Vitality Goal #2: Include learning and entertainment activities that Catalyze new development and accommodate interests of a more Diverse District and community population. Scale and Form Urban Design Goal #2: Utilize appropriately-scaled development and built form that adds Vitality and Activity to the District to create inviting and comfortable human experiences, enduring buildings and spaces, and a fitting sense of place. District Management Urban Design Goal #9: Perpetuate the Greater Southdale District by close and consistent Attention to the public realm and the Needs of people living or working in or visiting the District. Overall Land Use Goal #1: Facilitate the evolution of this regional destination into a higher density, sustainable, Mixed-Use area for “shop, live, work, play, learn, interact” with a distinctive and definable identity as“Edina’s Living Room.” District Services, Arts, and Culture Land Use Goal #7: Accommodate public, institutional, arts, and cultural elements that are needed to create a Complete and Livable community. Evolved Services and Facilities District Services and Facilities Goal #1: Ensure that an appropriate Range of Community Services and facilities supporting the Greater Southdale District’s population will be made available commensurate with its evolution. Lifelong Learning Services District Services and Facilities Goal #3: Encourage opportunities for Lifelong Learning and Education that will meet the needs and interests of the district’s and community population through facilities that are prominent in the experience of the District SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING The project site sits on the north side of West 77th Street, east of HWY 100 and north of HWY 494. Currently to the west The Finch residential complex is under construction. Seven Hills Preparatory Academy (SHPA) is working to develop the site for a K-5 Elementary Academy. The site has recently been rezoned to PUD-23. Although this site was zoned for educational use, under this new PUD the use is no longer permitted. The Owner seeks an Amendment to the PUD-23 zoning to include an Educational Use. The Greater Southdale District Plan has been reviewed in preparing this document. The project incorporates many of those goals. Additionally, the design plans for the Woonerf and the Fred Richards Park have played heavily into the design and development of this property. LIVE PLAY LEARN WORK INTERACT INTERACT SITE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT DIAGRAM COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 3 SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING LOCATION CONSIDERATIONS Aspiration #4 Create neighborhoods of activity within the broader mixed-use patterns of the district. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The property sits at the epicenter of four of Edina's largest residential areas. Giving these residence educational options helps stabilize the population. Nearly 50% of workers in this area travel under 10 miles to work. Creating educational opportunities along their routes gives an additional incentive to remain in the area. (Southdale District Study) The Greater Southdale District has a highly educated population indicating a population that is seeking education in all different forms. The Greater Southdale District has put mixed-use patterns as a priority for the district goals. COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. For Fire Safety an easement on the north side of the site allows for fire truck access across this site to the neighboring Finch site. Construction is not permitted in this area. The northern most portion of the site is in a flood plain, indicated in the blue overlay, that extends north into the park. To protect the watershed Option 3 was abandoned. A Property Easement extends from the neighboring property across the north side of the existing building. Construction is not permitted in this area. The Optimal Gym Location is at the northeast corner of the existing building. Here the new building has minimal impact on the flood plain, stays out of the two easements. The footprint of the gym impacts only 2% of the overall flood plain. The development of The Fred and The Finch sites were in coordination with this site. The goal was to activate the the street by keeping a wide swath of green space at 77th Street and holding the buildings back. Option 2 created an overly aggressive front to the site. Construction in this location was not in keeping with the feeling created at the neighboring sites. e Location of No. 3 per & T4996729 [7] Underground Easement per Doc. No. T904324 [9] Utility Easement per Doc. No. T3598236 Delineated Wetland Edge of Water 89°47'30"W 289.21 S00°12'31"E 473.90N89°47'30"E 286.31 Bituminous Parking Lot Existing Building Existing B prox. Separation Between her Areas Zone X and Other od Areas Zone X per FEMA Map OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X OTHER AREAS ZONE XNOPARKINGNOPAR K I N G 5 168 10 13 11 15NOPARKING NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING16 20 5 14 1215 13 9 4 NOPARKINGCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 OPTIMALGYMLOCATIONOPTION 3 OPTION 2FIRE LANE EASEMENT SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPERTY OWNER EASEMENT SITE CONSIDERATIONS 4COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 5 The site, as a whole, stays to true to the new PUD-23. Keeping intent of a walkable, inviting, human scaled environment. Additional green space is being added at the north side of the site. This allows for the park to meld further into the site. Additional trees and bushes are being added to the south elevation at the street front, softening the building front and creating a gateway to the park. See the next page for the minor modifications at the Woonerf. The gym addition is located against the northeast corner of the existing building. It's location keeps the new park access road open and allows for a view corridor of the park itself. SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING SITE ENHANCEMENTS SITE MODIFICATIONS 1 4600 W 77th STREET EXISTING 6350 SF GYMNASIUM ADDITION 91121PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESTAIRADDITION81 511 818181814620 W 77th STREET THE FINCH W 77TH ST PARK ACCESS DRIVE SETBACK 45'-0" SETBACK 50'-0"SETBACK40'-0"NO PARKING ONE WAY ONE WAY ONE WAY 6 1 6SETBACK22'-0"4570 W 77th STREET 2 1 THE FINCH OFFICE BUILDING 7'-4" 45'-0" SETBACK 0"0" EXISTING BUILDING FIRE LANE EASEMENT 3 4 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 6 Woonerf As Designed Limited Modifications Maintaining this "Street for Living" and maintaining the essence of the original design are paramount. The Woonerf will remain: Pedestrian Friendly with 96% of the day the bus area will be open for The Finch and cafe' traffic. The trees and landscaping will continue to line the street. Traffic calming will continue as parent drop-off and pick-up will take place on the north and east sides of the property. Modifications will include: Paver's will be added to the bus parking area to invite interaction during the majority of the day. Two parking buffers will be modified to allow buses a safer and quicker arrival and departure from the site. Additional trees and plantings will be added to account for the modifications to the two parking islands. Making and keeping 'good-neighbor' relationships is important. The Finch Owners have reviewed these changes and believe they benefit both properties. SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING WOONERF CONSIDERATIONS Modifications for Bus Parking Modifications for Bus Parking o.S00°12'31"E 473.90NOPA R K I N G 9 4 46 E PROPERTY LINESETBACK 50'-0" ONE WAY COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 7 SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING PARKING CONSIDERATIONS 4600 W 77th STREET EXISTING 6350 SF GYMNASIUM ADDITION 91121PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESTAIR ADDITION81 511 81818181SETBACK 45'-0" SETBACK 50'-0"SETBACK40'-0"NO PARKING ONE WAY ONE WAY ONE WAY 6 1 6SETBACK22'-0"EXISING BUILDING S Preliminary Parking Counts Institutional - Elementary School 1 Space Per Staff Member at largest shift, plus 1 space per 2 classrooms. On-Site The Finch Total Use Parking Parking Parking Available Required Provided Provided School 75 Teachers = 75 84 78 70 148 1 / 2 Classes= 9 There is a parking agreement in place with the Owners of The Finch. This agreement provides 70 parking spaces in The Finch underground parking lot. COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 8 PARK ACCESS DRIVE STUDENT DROP-OFF / PICK-UP 4600 W 77th STREET EXISTING 6350 SF GYMNASIUM ADDITION BUS ROUTEPARENT ROUTEBUS ROUTEPARENT ROUTE91121PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESTAIR ADDITION 511 81818181ET W 77TH ST PARK ACC OWNER EASEMENT24'-6"NO PARKING 91121816 1 6 ONE WAYFIRE EASEMENT24'-0"ONE WAY 4570 W STRE 4570 STR 4600 W 77th STREET EXISTING 6350 SF GYMNASIUM ADDITION BUS ROUTEPARENT ROUTEBUS ROUTEPARENT ROUTE91121PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESTAIRADDITION 511 81818181W 77TH ST PARK AC OWNER EASEMENT24'-6"NO PARKING 91121816 1 6 ONE WAYFIRE EASEMENT24'-0"ONE WAY ONE WAY PARK ACCESS DRIVE Morning Drop Off 7:30 - 8:00 AM Afternoon Pick Up 3:15 - 3:45 PMW 77TH ST Traffic Supervisors Parent Route Bus Route Morning drop off has slow flow of parents little or no stacking Afternoon pick-up stacks parents as indicated SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 7 SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING SCHOOL BUS SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT OPEN PARKING DURING THE DAY FROM 9AM-2PM AND 4PM-12PM BUS PARKING DURING DROFF OFF (7:30 AM-8:00 AM) AND PICK UP (2:30PM-3:15 PM)BUS PARKING DURING PICK UP AND DROP OFF HOURS OPEN PARKING AREA AND PATIO SEATING Woonerf Parking - Open parking to public during the day when school is in session - Area provides 6 parallel bus parking spaces and 14 regular spaces during open parking times 9COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 10 SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING K-5 FLOOR PLANS UPUPUPUPUPOPEN TO BELOWUPROOF @ GYMUPDNEDUCATION USE ASSEMBLY USE BUSINESS USE COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 11 SHPA: 4600 WEST 77TH STREET BUILDING SITE RENDERINGS Materiality - Gym addition will be precast concrete panels in a complementary color to existing building BUILDING FROM W 77TH ST BUILDING FROM MAIN ENTRY AERIAL BACK VIEW OF GYM ADDITION VIEW OF COMMUNITY PARK FROM 77TH ST AERIAL FRONT VIEW OF GYM ADDITION COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, Inc. 1112 125 SE Main Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Elizabeth McCollough, Architect p 651-470-1946 emccollough@cdg-mn.com Site Existing buildings EdinaMN.gov Sketch Plan Review 4600 77th Street West Existing buildings Formal Application Would Require The request would require the following: 1.An Ordinance Amendment to allow schools within this PUD-23 Zoning District. 2.A revised Overall Development Plan for PUD-23. 3.Site Plan and Setback Variance for the gymnasium from 45 feet to 37 feet and a drive aisle separation requirement from 10 feet to 0 feet for the parent drop-off drive aisle. 4.Likely variances would be requested for building material and building transparency for the gymnasium addition. Issues/Considerations Issues/Considerations Issues/Considerations Issues/Considerations Discussion/Feedback 2200 Zane Ave N | Minneapolis, MN 55422 www.archfieldoffice.com Cary: Per your request, we reviewed the sketch plan submission for the development of the site at 4600 West 77th Street for the proposed Seven Hills Prepartory Academy based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for the future district, translating their guiding principles to the built environment. The resulting vision for development in the Greater Southdale District is to create an enhanced human experience along existing major and new connector streets, with overall experience shaped via landscape setbacks, building step backs, a hierarchy of street typologies, transparency at street level, a minimized impact of the car, and managing storm water as an amenity. The outcome of our collaborations with the Work Group is described in the urban design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan and resulted in the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. In on our review of the proposal, it appears that the applicant based their overall planning approach and the evaluation of those options on the urban design chaper of the Greater Southdale District Plan. This is an important place to start in understanding the long-term community goals for the Southdale District, and outlining selective goals from this chapter is a way to focus in on the question of what the City of Edina is trying to achieve in its overall plan for the district between 2018 and 2028. However, it was not apparent that the applicant considered the Plan’s companion document, the Design Experience Guidelines, which are more specific to the development of projects within the Southdale District. The Guidelines are intended to provide guidance to specific conditions within the district in relation to building heights, setbacks and step backs, the public realm experience along major and minor streets, and the experiential qualities of the public realm. We commend the design team in articulating some of the impacts from an urban design perspective the school and new gymnasium will have on the larger context of the site. But without To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date November 9, 2023 2 considering the Design Experience Guidelines, the Urban Design Goal # 2: Scale and Form cited on page 2 of the sketch plan submission misses the point from a public realm design perspective. As we looked more closely at the proposed site plan and considered the three site plan options, for better alignment with the spirit of the Design Experience Guidelines, we suggest that the applicant reconsider the selected option that locates the gymnasium addition at the back of the site in favor of Option 2. As it relates to the DEG, our major concern is with the proposed gymnasium's location at the back of the site and the architectural characteristics that it exhibits by its warehouse-like image. Following are several thoughts on how pursuing Option 2 could allow the project to better comply with the Design Experience Guidelines: 1. The DEG is specific about aligning new construction to 75% facing setbacks. In this proposal, Option 2 would enable the project to meet that criterion. Integrating glass along the street level of the gynasium could add significant activity to the public realm, and would help the project meet the guidelines of 75% transparency along the street. From an operational standpoint, locating the new gym at the setback along 77th Street would also align nicely with the other proposed Assembly uses at the front of the building, combining the gymnasium and multi-purpose spaces as a public-facing front to the public realm. 2. The aesthetic of a new gymnasium located on West 77th Street, with greater transparency along the street – rather than a warehouse-looking structure located at the back of the site – can bring life and interest to the public realm. It would represent a public face for the school and can also become a community asset, perhaps available for use by members of the community in evenings or on weekends for recreation and events, and offer a potential additional revenue stream to the school through rental of the space. 3. The DEG discourages the use of on-grade parking. Unless there are no other alternatives that can appropriately locate it out of sight of the public realm experience, screening cars is the next best alternative. Locating the gymnasium at the face of the public realm setback on West 77th would effectively screen on-street parking from the street. 4. The addition of trees and shrubs along West 77th does not create a gateway to Fred Richards Park as indicated under Site Modifications. A notable architectural building design would create a more memorable identity to the street entrance, and frame the view corridor to the park. 5. Locating the gymnasium on West 77th Street would have no impact on the flood plain. 6. Locating the gymnasium on West 77th Street may offer greater flexibility for morning drop off and afternoon pickup, and would screen it from the public realm. 3 We offer a few excerpts from the Design Experience Guidelines for the team’s consideration: Aspirations for the Future Greater Southdale District, page 3 7. Encourage district evolution based on incremental change and the creation of a great pedestrian experience where: • A basic framework of streets and blocks encourages pedestrian activity and well- considered buildings. • A rich variety of public or publicly accessible spaces are woven into the experience of the district. • Sites and buildings support a pedestrian experience first, with storage of cars not a focus. • Development on each site links to adjacent streets and to neighboring sites to create continuous, safe, and inviting pedestrian experiences. 10. Expect the delivery of high quality, well-designed buildings and sites where: • Spaces on sites are considered for people first, including connections between sites; then the ways structures are placed; and then places to store cars are found. • Visible human activity is prominent and integrated at every site. • People are brought to the streets via major building entries oriented to major streets. • Storm water remains visible as an amenity, allowing it to become a central part of the experience of each site In addition, in the context of the hierarchy of streets that exists within the Greater Southdale District, West 77th Street is considered a “Boulevard” in the Design Experience Guidelines – along with portions of France, York, and 66th. Proposed projects along these important District streets should adhere as closely as possible to the Guidelines’ description of Street Room Typology 5 (excerpt follows): 4 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 5, The Boulevards pages 32-33: The street room experience within Typology 5 will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • On France Avenue, a 50 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a minimum building height of 60 feet (diagram at left). Above that 60 foot height, the building face should step back two feet to create a cornice line, and can then extend to 105 feet. Above 105 feet, building faces must step back an additional 10 feet (as illustrated in diagram at right, above.) • Building podiums along these streets need to maintain as closely as possible the 60-foot height limit while still adhering to the guidance of 75% of building face at the setback line to create the fundamental experience of the street room. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • Parking and building services should not be accessed via these streets. • Incorporate 10- to 12-foot wide sidewalks that create opportunities for gathering, outdoor cafes, pavilions, etc. • Within the 50-foot setback, trees should be planted in a double row to add a strong canopy for pedestrian activity. Moving forward, we strongly consider the applicant to familiarize themselves with the Design Experience Guidelines and look for ways to better align the proposed development with those Guidelines. Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Advisory Communication: Organized Trash Collection Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The Energy and Environment Commission is submitting this advisory communication on Organized Trash Collection (OTC). ATTACHMENTS: Description Advisory Communication on Organized Trash Collection (OTC) Date: 11/09/2023 To: Mayor and City Council From: Energy & Environment Commission Subject: Advisory Communication on Organized Trash Collection (OTC) Action Requested: 1. Call a vote on November 21, 2023 upon receipt of the Staff Report on OTC 2. Vote to initiate the statutory process on OTC under MN Statute 115A.94 Background: Over the past 3 years, City Council has directed a stakeholder group consisting of EEC, ETC, numerous city staff, the City Attorney, City Manager, outside council, waste haulers, and City Council to research, report on, and discuss Organized Trash Collection and its potential deployment in Edina. This work has culminated in a report – authored by 7 City of Edina staff members – that you will be receiving in the November 21, 2023 Council meeting. November 21, 2023 is the day to act, one way or another, on OTC. Assessment: Why EEC supports initiating the statutory process on OTC: 1. Initiating the statutory process does NOT bind the city to implementing OTC. Per outside council, upon initiating the statutory process “nothing locks the city into taking any further steps to implement organized collection beyond the meet and confer period.” The data gaps we currently have – related to market share, traffic safety, fuel efficiency – are a direct result of the haulers being unwilling to provide private data they would otherwise share during the initial phase of OTC. By initiating the process, we will get additional data that will be instrumental in crafting a successful implementation plan. 2. 59% of residents want OTC. It’s no longer 50/50. In the 2023 Quality of Life survey, the number of supporters (46% of respondents) outweighs the number of opponents (32% of respondents) by a factor of 1.44 to 1. Factoring only those who answered the question one way or another, the supporters represent 59% of residents. This is new data that we did not have in previous conversations on the topic and clearly indicates that OTC is preferred by residents. 3. OTC impacts multiple climate issues and actions in the Climate Action Plan. a. Waste diversion – this supports waste diversion from landfill by standardizing the hauling process and allowing yard waste to be collected separately city-wide. Page 2 b. Waste stream management will also support measurement of waste reduction efforts by requiring that haulers share waste data with the city. c. Taking 5 heavy vehicles off the road 5 days a week will reduce our GHG emissions, however the specific impact was not measured by staff. 4. The vast majority of the policy outcomes associated with OTC are net positive. Staff conclude that the outcomes of OTC are either neutral or positive, specifically: a. Greenhouse Gas emissions – positive (i.e. reduction in emissions) b. Equity – positive c. Traffic safety – neutral (arguably positive) d. Traffic noise – positive e. Customer Service – neutral f. Impact to roads – neutral (arguably positive) 5. Staff’s “major concern” relates to their lack of a plan on how to staff this. This is not a policy outcome evaluation and is presented as such. a. Staff place their “major concern” on page 1 of their report without mentioning that later in the report, they have a solution: use a fee within the new contract structure under OTC to fund a new staff position to manage OTC. b. Bloomington and Richfield have already successfully implemented OTC. This is not a brand new policy without precedent. This is not an unmanageable quagmire. c. Edina is capable of implementing OTC. Staffing is a consideration that should be solved when creating the implementation plan and drafting the final policy. 6. Staff wrongly concludes that "a traffic safety issue does not exist with garbage trucks." Staff used an incomplete dataset from MNDOT. Staff even acknowledged that “due to the limitations of the dataset, it is not possible to determine what percentage of crashes specifically involved a garbage truck.” Yet, knowingly using a limited dataset, they conclude that there is no issue. At best, staff still has no idea whether there is an issue. 7. Every week in Edina, 6 garbage trucks drive down every single street to collect the same waste stream. This is fundamentally unnecessary. Recommendation: The Energy & Environment Commission respectfully recommends that Council take action on November 21, 2023 to initiate the statutory process on Organized Trash Collection under Minnesota State Statute 115A.94. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Advisory Communication: Organized Trash Collection Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The Transportation Commission is submitting this advisory communication to endorse the Energy & Environment Commission’s November 9, 2023 Advisory Communication and recommend that Council take action on November 21, 2023 to initiate the statutory process on organized trash collection under Minnesota State Statute 115A.94. ATTACHMENTS: Description Advisory Communication: Organized Trash Collection (ETC) Date: November 16, 2023 To: Mayor and City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: Organized Trash Collection Action Requested: Every week in Edina, six garbage trucks drive down every single street to collect the same waste stream. This is fundamentally unnecessary. The Transportation Commission strongly endorses the Energy & Environment Commission’s November 9, 2023 Advisory Communication to Council and recommends that Council take action on November 21, 2023 to initiate the statutory process on organized trash collection under Minnesota State Statute 115A.94. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Community Health Commission, June 12, July 10, August 14, 2023 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes of the Community Health Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: CHC: June 12, 2023 Minutes: CHC: July 10, 2023 Minutes: CHC: August 14, 2023 MINUTES Community Health Commission June 12, 2023 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order II.Roll Call Present: Nick Mattison, Brenna Smithson, Tracy Nelson, Andrea Patineau, Matt Giljahn, Andrea Leszko, Julia Selleys. III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Tracy Nelson to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by Julia Selleys. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: CHC: April 10 and May 16, 2023 Motion by Andrea Leszko to approve April 10 and May 16, 2023 meeting minutes. Seconded by Matt Giljahn. Motion Carried. V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Communications Presentation and Discussion Presentation from Communications Department Director Jennifer Bennerotte regarding resources available to Commissions related to work plan initiatives with a marketing/outreach component. B.Subcommittee Updates Discussion around current status of initiatives and confirming which members are assigned to initiatives. Initiative 1: Social Connectedness: Matt Giljahn, Andrew Hawkins, Brenna Smithson Initiative 2: Stop the Bleed: Mary Absolon, Andrea Leszko, Ben Hykes Initiative 3: Opioid Stakeholder Group: Julia Selleys, Mary Absolon, Nick Mattison Initiative 4: Racism as a PH Emergency: Tracy Nelson, Andrea Patineau, Nick Mattison, Jay Shapiro VII.Chair And Member Comments VIII.Staff Comments IX.Adjournment MINUTES Community Health Commission July 10, 2023 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Nick Mattison to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by Julia Selleys. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Community Health Commission: June 12, 2023 Motion by Andrew Hawkins to approve June 12, 2023 meeting minutes. Seconded by Nick Mattison. Motion Carried. V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Stop the Bleed Initiative Report Motion by Tracy Nelson to approve Stop the Bleed initiative report for submission to Council. Seconded by Matt Giljahn. Motion Carried. B.Subcommittee Updates Social Connectedness: Meeting next week Opioid: In motion, no outreach meetings for past couple of months. Nick Mattison is checking in on updates from Bloomington Public Health P.H. Emergency: Review and Report will be submitted for discussion later VII.Chair And Member Comments VIII.Staff Comments A.2023 CHC Attendance IX.Adjournment MINUTES Community Health Commission August 14, 2023 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order II.Roll Call Present: Brenna Smithson, Andrea Leszko, Andrea Patineau, Mary Absolon, Tracy Nelson, Nick Mattison, Matt Giljahn, Andrew Hawkins. A.Commission Photo - Communications III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Nick Mattison to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by Tracy Nelson. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Community Health Commission: July 10, 2023 Motion by Andrea Leszko to approve meeting minutes. Seconded by Andrew Hawkins. Motion Carried. V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Subcommittee Updates B.Work Plan Development Discussion Items discussed for potential work plan initiatives: 1. Continuation and refinement of current social connectedness initiative 2. Racism as a Public Health Emergency - potential review and recommend 3. Opioid Stakeholder Workgroup - continued participation 4. Climate Action Plan items: Climate and Health 5. Cannabis Regulation: any role for CHC? 6. Water quality? Interested in presentation from City staff. VII.Chair And Member Comments A.Stop the Bleed - Sun Current Article VIII.Staff Comments A.Chair and Vice-Chair at Council Work Session - Annual Work Plan Meeting - Chair Presentations Jeff to send examples of Study and Report Advisory Communication and Link to Climate Action Plan for possible 2024 work plan ideas. IX.Adjournment Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Perry Vetter, Director Parks & Recreation Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission September 12, 2023 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes from the Sept. 12, 2023 Parks & Recreation Commission meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Sept. 12, 2023 PARC Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/13/2023 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission Braemar Golf Course September 12, 2023 7 p.m. I. Call to Order Chair Doscotch called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Doscotch, Ites, Luangrath, Pfuhl, Spanhake, Weaver, Ytterbo and Student Commissioners DiLorenzo and Holtey Commissioner Welsh arrived at 7:14 p.m. Staff Present: Staff Liaison Perry Vetter, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Tom Swenson, Assistant Director Recreation & Facilities Tracy Petersen, Park Planner Rachel Finberg, General Manager Patty McGrath, Recreation Supervisor Amanda Clarke and Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Weaver to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Pfuhl. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Weaver to approve the Aug. 8, 2023 minutes. Motion seconded by Pfuhl. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Welcome Student Commissioners Staff Liaison Vetter introduced the new student Commissioners Alessandra DiLorenzo and Sonja Holt. VI. Community Comment None VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Edina Aquatic Center Update Assistant Director Petersen introduced General Manager Patty McGrath. General Manager McGrath shared highlights of the summer for the Edina Aquatic Center, including pop-up events, season dates, after-hours swimming event, and their continued relationship with two different swim clubs. The Aquatic Center had 118 total rescues of swimmers, ages 3-71. She updated on concessions, staffing, inspections, and entrance updates. The Commission asked questions regarding the capacity of the Aquatic Center, 2024 fees, and the history of attendance spikes. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/13/2023 B. Summer Youth and Special Event Programming Update Assistant Director Petersen introduced Recreation Supervisor Amanda Clarke. Recreation Supervisor Clarke recapped the summer programs and events, including sports, gymnastics, dance, inclusion in the traveling team program, art therapy classes, and pool classes. Programs were offered at eight different parks, and there were 5,232 visits in total. Challenges included the poor air quality days and lower participation at August camps. The Giving Garden at Lewis Park has donated 191 pounds of fresh produce to the youth so far this year. Recreation Supervisor Clarke updated on some upcoming events that are coming up for the fall season. The Commission asked questions regarding neighborhood fun nights, C. 2023 Work Plan Initiative 1.6.2: Braemar Park Implementation Review and Comment Staff Liaison Vetter introduced Park Planner Rachel Finberg, who gave a presentation to the Commission on the Braemar Park Implementation. Park Planner Finberg gave an overview of the project including the phases schematic design (SD), design development (DD), and construction document (CD) and the importance of the commissions review and comment. Park Planner Finberg gave an overview of the proposed pedestrian and bicycle trail alignments by segments as well as the Courtney Fields proposed upgrades, she then opened the floor for Commission members to comment on the proposed designs. The Commission asked questions regarding mountain biking mileage, trailheads, restroom facilities, peak hauling, mountain biking team involvement in trail designs, and the vegetative buffer. Park Planner Finberg also gave an update on Courtney Fields and the design for trails. The Commission asked questions regarding fees, internal trail work, events, and total referendum costs. The Commission asked and provided the following specific comments. Commissioner Pfuhl asked what is the total amount of mountain biking miles that are there. It was noted approximately 7.7 mile at this stage of design. Commissioner Ytterbo asked are local mountain biking teams involved in how these trails are designed. It was noted they have a representative from the Edina Mountain Biking Team who gave some of the initial input. Also, MORC is another organization that has given input as well as there is an executive team that has been giving input. They have been gathering a lot of feedback. Commissioner Ytterbo asked regarding the middle berm or boardwalk and the long prairie grass is the idea to have something natural and growing separated. It was noted that the idea is to have a vegetative buffer for multiple reasons, one to create a third corridor for you but also because that breaks up the hard surface as well so that would help them also in their permitting in going through those wetland areas. Commissioner Ytterbo asked if there would be a maintenance plan, and this should be on the same maintenance plan as the natives around it so this will all be a maintained area. They will be cognizant of what species are seeded within these strips. Most of the hiking trail will not be asphalt but will be a soft surface like a Class 5 which will lend better to the vegetation. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/13/2023 Chair Doscotch asked on the big loop walking pedestrian trail, what is the total from connection to connection where you have a start and finish to do the loop, how long is it. It was noted there are multiple starting points and different areas to loop but it is approximately a little over 3 ½ miles. Commissioner Doscotch asked does someone have to walk 3 ½ miles to do the loop. It was noted that they do have smaller loops within the system, it would just be you need to go out and come back. It was also noted that the main reason for that is to avoid conflict between mountain bikes and pedestrians. Commissioner Ytterbo commented he is very excited that they are optimizing the land and he is thinking about the long-term side of things and asked is it being weighed as they are starting to develop the maintenance and equipment needed. He knows they’ve talked a little bit about budget and fees but how is this going to be maintained because it doesn’t look like it’s a fee generated system, how is it going to work. It was noted from general funding. It was also noted that the mountain biking community does a lot of work on trails internally whether it be Midwest Off-Road Cycling Association (MORC) or even the high school team, they are required to do so many hours of volunteer work. Also, not having the built features will help with that because they are not going to necessarily go out there and do inspections. They are going to depend a little bit more on the teams to tell them when something needs to be fixed and managed. Commissioner Welsh asked if they will be having any events or competitions. It was noted this facility will not have events and competitions but will be used for riding and practice. They are looking at what was voiced by the high school team which was skills development. Also noted there is going to be a lot of people but it’s not a destination point. They are going to allow teams to have practice and they have talked about the aspect of identifying and acknowledging when those practice times would be and get that information to the public. Commission Pfuhl asked if there will be a liaison with MORC and Parks & Recreation. It was noted that MORC will internally give updates on their trails, but they will still need to communicate with the non- community and that is where their role will be. The person going to walk there isn’t checking the app for the mounting biking trail. Chair Doscotch asked about the feedback from the Gleason neighborhood that showed up at the open house. It was noted they had a very respectful dialog. It was more of a timing what does it look like, distances away, how are you going to be operating, etc. It was also noted that most people were excited and interested in the project and staff relayed to them their commitment to keeping them informed as they continued to move forward because there is a lot going on with it. Commissioner Ytterbo asked if this will overlap with the arena because he knows they border each other, will the plans for the arena come into play with the plans for everything else that is going on at Braemar. It was noted they are separate and won’t be contingent on each other. Chair Doscotch commented on the volume of utilization management on those trails and how that will work. It was noted that hopefully in the future people will know the busiest times of day and the quietest times. Commission Ytterbo asked how it will be enforced. It was noted they would not close Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/13/2023 the trails; no one would get exclusive use. They need to make sure that people are aware of the activity that is occurring and to choose wisely. D. 2023 Work Plan Initiative 1.6.4: Alternative Funding Sources Review and Comment Commissioner Doscotch presented the Alternative Funding Sources report that was put together by the initiative group. He gave an overview of the main points of the report and asked that the Commission would be ready to discuss and ask questions at the next meeting. E. 2023 Commission Work Plan Initiative #1 – Support Fred Richards Park Implementation. Initiative #2 – Support Braemar Park Implementation. Nothing additional to add. Initiative #3 – Support Braemar Arena Implementation. Initiative #4 – Alternative Funding Sources. Nothing additional to add. Initiative #5 – Comparable Community Parks/Recreational Opportunities. Commissioner Pfuhl asked the Commission to email her what outside of Edina recreation Commissioners were involved in during the summer months. Initiative #6 – Parks & Recreation Presentations. Commissioner Weaver updated that he is working to find updated funding numbers and will have questions for the Commission at the next meeting. F. 2024 Work Plan Development Discussion Chair Doscotch updated on the two components that have been discussed: the curing of the first three initiatives and the development of an initiative related to the climate action plan. Commissioner Pfuhl asked if there was a way to enhance recycling efforts to enhance the park system. Chair Doscotch discussed a way to incorporate resident-user experience enhancement into an initiative, what system- wide changes to make based on quantitative information from residents, and the league issues. The four items that seem to have most interest are the three from last year plus the climate action plan. Motion: Evaluate the feasibility and ability to increase community gardens based on need and opportunity in the park system to do so. Motion made by Luangrath to approve Initiatives 1, 2, 3, plus the community garden. Motion seconded by Spanhake. Motion failed. Doscotch refined the motion to be the following: evaluate the upcoming need for shelters to evaluate actions to either standardize or not and consider potential climate-related factors that may be involved. The standardized items should be comparative and look at what other communities are doing. This would be the fifth initiative. Motion made by Luangrath to approve the five initiatives for the 2024 Work Plan. Motion seconded by Spanhake. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/13/2023 VIII. Chair and Member Comments Commissioner Ites asked about the update on the trails at Lewis Park. IX. Staff Comments A. Upcoming Meetings and Events October 3, 2023 will be the presentation of 2024 Work Plan. Monday, November 13, 2023 will be regular meeting, due to Election Day. X. Adjournment Motion made by Pfuhl to adjourn the Sept. 12, 2023 meeting at 9:29 p.m. Motion seconded by Luangrath. Meeting adjourned. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: X.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Liz Moore, Engineering Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, October 12, 2023 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the October 12, 2023, minutes of the Energy & Environment Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description Energy & Environment Commission Minutes, October 12, 2023 Agenda Energy and Environment Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall - Community Room Meeting will take place in person. Masks are optional. Thursday, October 12, 2023 7:00 PM I.Call To Order Chair Martinez called the meeting to order at 7:10pm, after a group photo at 7pm II.Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Martinez, Vice Chair Lukens, Commissioners Weber, Hovanec, Tessman and Haugen, and student Commissioners Pugh and Langsweirdt. Late: Commissioners Lanzas, Dakane Absent: Commissioner Schima III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Teri Hovanec to Approve Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Hilda Martinez Salgado. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission Sep 14, 2023 Motion by Cory Lukens to Approve Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Teri Hovanec. Motion Carried. V.Community Comment No community comment was received During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Reports/Recommendations A.2023 Workplan Update Discussion Commissioners provided updates on 2023 work plan items underway VII.Chair And Member Comments Chair described Council feedback on 24 WP proposal Commissioners discussed the memo from staff regarding organized trash collection; Commissioners expressed their dismay at the lack of a staff recommendations. They shared specific concerns related to memo content and format of information. Commissioners underscored their perspective that more staff is needed to implement the CAP. Commissioners discussed the need for City Council to show leadership through robust Climate Action Plan implementation. VIII.Staff Comments IX.Adjournment The EEC meeting adjourned at 8:18pm. Motion by Teri Hovanec to Adjourn. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. T he City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: XI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Quarterly Financial Report and Progress Portal Updates Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The latest Quarterly Financial Report is attached. Quarterly updates have been made to work plans as well. See below for links to the updated work plans on the Progress P ortal: 2022-2023 Budget Work Plan Race & Equity Work P lan Climate Action Plan Advisory Commissions Work Plans ATTACHMENTS: Description 2023 Quarter 3 Finance Report City of Edina – Q3 2023 Summary of the City’s financial performance by fund for September YTD 2023 General Fund Revenue • Fines and Forfeitures – Revenue received from fines paid in court. Averaging $41K a month in 2023 compared to $27K PY due to increased traffic citations. • Investment Income – $2.7M income received on investment income, including $932K unrealized loss. Interest allocation booked at year-end, creating material year-over- year variance. • Building Rental – Account is made up of Park and Cell Tower rental. Cell Tower rental revenue in 2022 was overstated by $207K as 2023 revenue was booked in 2022. Prior period adjustment will be made at year-end. • Property Taxes – 70% Advancement received at end of June 2023. Property taxes are the primary revenue source and are received in June and December. • Franchise Fees – Payments are recorded quarterly, have received 1st & 2nd quarter payment. • Licenses & Permits - Building permit revenue fluctuates based on the number of permits and valuation year-over-year. September YTD 2023 is 1,495 permits with valuation of $195M, compared to 1,839 permits issued with valuation of $359M in September YTD 2022. • Intergovernmental – CY received $548K related to PS State and Grant Aid and $1M for Police and Fire State Aid. PY recognized $1.2M ARPA grant revenue and $1M received in Metro Council pass-thru funds for 4040 W. 70th Construction costs. • Charges for Services – In line with budget and prior year income. $1M for Charges to Other funds and $1.8M income received for Ambulance fees. Includes services billed to other funds and external vendors. Expenses • Generally, 25% of budgeted expenses are recognized each quarter. September YTD includes 19 payroll periods, which is 73% of total annual pay periods. Pay Period 20 (9/23/2023-10/6/2023) expense posted in October. • Capital Outlay - $199K in expense related to ARPA funded projects (City Fiber Expansion, CLP furniture and equipment, Edinborough Gym floor upgrade) • Contributions & Transfers – CY, $963K of 2022 surplus funds was transferred to Construction Fund offset by $148K Utility Contribution compared to PY, $110K Utility Contribution, with $750K of 2021 surplus transferred out in Q4 2022. 2023 budgeted transfer is $157K from the Utility Fund. YTD 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Fines and Forfeit 329,451 650,000 214,409 51% Investment Income 1,808,782 250,000 (5,390,766) 724% Building Rental 167,063 339,000 420,477 49% Property Taxes 20,262,485 39,820,200 18,794,698 51% Franchise Fees 399,202 810,000 405,134 49% Lodging Tax 24,637 20,000 72,941 123% Licenses & Permits 4,679,949 5,466,160 6,070,749 86% Intergovernmental 1,609,867 1,605,100 4,018,824 100% Charges for Services 4,410,211 5,945,791 4,335,596 74% Other Revenue 155,076 36,500 82,715 425% Total Revenues 33,846,722 54,942,751 29,024,776 62% Expenses Salaries (20,131,892) (28,044,439) (18,579,055) 72% Benefits (7,747,493) (10,920,178) (6,905,710) 71% Contractual Services (7,325,666) (8,764,510) (6,275,302) 84% Commodities (1,435,324) (2,444,743) (1,802,954) 59% Capital Outlay (199,564) - (22,930) N/A Internal Services (3,844,788) (5,126,384) (3,758,495) 75% Total Expenses (40,684,727) (55,300,254) (37,344,446) 74% Net Operating Income (Loss)(6,838,005) (357,503) (8,319,670) 1913% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Sale of Property 5,873 - 13,986 N/A Contrib & Transfers (815,158) 157,500 110,909 -518% Miscellaneous - Non Op 7,705 - 9,659 N/A Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (801,580) 157,500 134,554 -509% Net Income (Loss)(7,639,585) (200,003) (8,185,116) 3820% Parks & Recreation Enterprises Financial cost recovery measures are included below. The measures include “Total Cost Recovery”, the percentage of operating costs recovered by enterprise generated revenue, and “Management Cost Recovery”, the percentage of controllable costs (excludes internal expenses and depreciation) recovered by enterprise generated revenue. Art Center YTD 2023 revenues make up 8% of budget. YTD 2023 expenses make up 37% of budget. Revenues and expenses are trending significantly below budget due to the art center building closure. As a result, class offerings are down, and overall activity has reduced. Activity is expected to change with a new art center. YTD 2023 Budget 2023 YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Charges for Services - 26,725 - 0% Sales - 18,255 - 0% Memberships - 15,664 - 0% Admissions 66,126 422,070 103,037 16% Other Fees 1 19,769 - 0% Total Revenues 66,126 502,483 103,037 13% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - (500) - 0% Salaries (167,806) (513,296) (127,075) 33% Benefits (39,528) (103,637) (21,025) 38% Contractual Services (46,435) (115,819) (40,996) 40% Commodities (21,954) (79,000) (18,464) 28% Internal Services (48,513) (64,684) (46,843) 75% Depreciation (4,500) (6,000) (4,500) 75% Total Expenses (328,736) (882,936) (258,902) 37% Net Operating Income (Loss)(262,610) (380,453) (155,866) 69% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Donations Non-Op 500 - 10,457 N/A Contrib & Transfers - 300,000 - 0% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 500 300,000 10,457 0% Net Income (Loss)(262,110) (80,453) (145,408) 326% Total Cost Recovery 20%57%40% Management Cost Recovery 24%62%50% Aquatic Center 2023 season is June 8th through August 20th, with June representing roughly 1/3 of total admissions and building rental revenue. YTD 2023 revenues make up 101% of budget. YTD 2023 expenses make up 105% of budget. 2020 data is not reflected in chart due to COVID driven aquatic center closure. YTD 2023 Budget 2023 YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Charges for Services 4,507 5,500 2,189 82% Sales 164,930 127,000 168,108 130% Memberships 323,764 460,000 405,045 70% Admissions 528,774 425,000 492,231 124% Other Fees 6 850 288 1% Building Rental 76,341 70,720 87,047 108% Total Revenues 1,098,322 1,089,070 1,154,908 101% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (74,137) (52,250) (70,353) 142% Salaries (532,551) (476,810) (399,001) 112% Benefits (74,588) (67,465) (49,180) 111% Contractual Services (250,342) (190,234) (229,450) 132% Commodities (111,009) (114,700) (119,949) 97% Internal Services (32,387) (43,183) (31,364) 75% Depreciation (217,503) (290,000) (217,503) 75% Total Expenses (1,292,517) (1,234,642) (1,116,800) 105% Net Operating Income (Loss)(194,196) (145,572) 38,108 133% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 20,000 - 0% Contrib & Transfers 31,559 16,000 12,921 197% Miscellaneous Non-Op 250 - - N/A Interest & Fiscal Charges (16,500) (4,775) (19,800) 346% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 15,309 31,225 (6,879) 49% Net Income (Loss)(178,886) (114,347) 31,229 156% Total Cost Recovery 85%88%103% Management Cost Recovery 109%122%135% Edinborough Park Daily admissions down 22% or 4K from Q2 to Q3. YTD 2023 revenues make up 78% of budget. YTD 2023 expenses make up 64% of budget. YTD 2023 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Charges for Services 6,969 10,000 9,868 70% Sales 57,569 135,000 20,524 43% Memberships 104,834 90,000 81,298 116% Admissions 583,298 698,000 523,251 84% Other Fees 167,427 225,000 171,040 74% Building Rental 168,831 230,904 153,625 73% Lodging Tax 3,377 - 11,800 N/A Total Revenues 1,092,304 1,388,904 971,406 79% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (22,593) (78,000) (2,492) 29% Salaries (380,476) (725,117) (436,238) 52% Benefits (157,318) (240,467) (151,777) 65% Contractual Services (312,397) (387,676) (160,522) 81% Commodities (103,926) (149,900) (111,350) 69% Internal Services (115,845) (154,460) (111,866) 75% Depreciation (108,747) (145,000) (105,003) 75% Total Expenses (1,201,303) (1,880,620) (1,079,249) 64% Net Operating Income (Loss)(108,999) (491,716) (107,843) 22% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 11,000 - 0% Contrib & Transfers 11,717 12,000 1,275,718 98% Miscellaneous Non-Op - - 1,514 N/A Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 11,717 23,000 1,277,232 51% Net Income (Loss)(97,282) (468,716) 1,169,389 21% Total Cost Recovery 91%74%90% Management Cost Recovery 114%89%114% Centennial Lakes Park Putting course, paddle boat rental and lawn bowling are open through Q3 2023. Total 2023 revenues make up 91% of budget. Total 2023 expenses make up 79% of budget. Salaries up from 2022 due to hiring of vacant positions and increased wages to recruit. YTD 2023 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Sales 28,710 26,000 27,197 110% Admissions 200 - 701 N/A Other Fees 516,358 565,000 540,882 91% Building Rental 40,578 93,000 75,722 44% Equipment Rental 171,973 149,000 192,067 115% Total Revenues 757,819 833,000 836,568 91% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (11,530) (12,000) (11,507) 96% Salaries (552,659) (639,972) (386,062) 86% Benefits (140,691) (194,332) (122,298) 72% Contractual Services (217,146) (283,368) (175,589) 77% Commodities (88,303) (148,950) (76,031) 59% Internal Services (99,436) (132,581) (96,085) 75% Depreciation (27,747) (37,000) (27,747) 75% Total Expenses (1,137,511) (1,448,203) (895,319) 79% Net Operating Income (Loss)(379,692) (615,203) (58,750) 62% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 4,000 - 0% Donations Non-Op 10,179 - 21,642 N/A Contrib & Transfers 35,827 425,000 2,065,671 8% Miscellaneous Non-Op - - 212 N/A Sale of Property 4,010 - 15 N/A Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 50,016 429,000 2,087,540 12% Net Income (Loss)(329,675) (186,203) 2,028,790 177% Total Cost Recovery 67%58%93% Management Cost Recovery 79%68%112% Braemar Arena Utilization represents hours scheduled out of total hours available. Prime vs non-prime is dependent upon the time of day and time of year, which is charged at differing rates. Arena prime ice hours utilization at 65% so far this year. Arena non-prime ice hours utilization at 53% so far this year. Total 2023 revenues make up 88% of budget. Total 2023 expenses make up 76% of budget. YTD 2023 Budget 2023 YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Charges for Services 120,998 75,500 91,914 160% Sales 234,659 309,500 200,216 76% Admissions 193,861 255,000 210,105 76% Other Fees 1,612 - 5,874 N/A Building Rental 1,772,771 1,996,739 1,516,466 89% Equipment Rental 3,745 6,000 4,538 62% Total Revenues 2,327,646 2,642,739 2,029,114 88% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (105,788) (111,000) (84,159) 95% Salaries (631,477) (1,024,178) (625,272) 62% Benefits (162,229) (243,671) (170,704) 67% Contractual Services (948,294) (1,007,222) (730,232) 94% Commodities (67,976) (140,750) (41,766) 48% Internal Services (183,274) (244,365) (177,086) 75% Depreciation (498,753) (665,000) (495,000) 75% Total Expenses (2,597,790) (3,436,186) (2,324,220) 76% Net Operating Income (Loss)(270,144) (793,447) (295,106) 34% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 3,000 24 0% Contrib & Transfers 34,208 392,000 32,697 9% Miscellaneous Non-Op 750 - 2,183 N/A Interest & Fiscal Charges (63,640) (58,436) (75,402) 109% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (28,682) 336,564 (40,498) -9% Net Income (Loss)(298,826) (456,883) (335,604) 65% Total Cost Recovery 90%77%87% Management Cost Recovery 125%106%125% Braemar Field Utilization represents hours scheduled out of total hours available. Prime vs non-prime is dependent upon the time of day and time of year, which is charged at differing rates. Braemar Dome is not open during Q3, May-Oct, which is reflected in the reduction in YTD average prime and non-prime utilization percentages. Field prime hours utilization at 58% so far this year. Field non-prime hours utilization at 22% so far this year. Total 2023 revenues make up 77% of budget. Total 2023 expenses make up 80% of budget. Salaries over budget due to increased hourly rates to recruit and retain employees. YTD 2023 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Admissions 19,472 25,000 15,805 78% Other Fees 283 - 319 N/A Building Rental 410,456 535,000 327,549 77% Total Revenues 430,210 560,000 343,673 77% Expenses Salaries (133,211) (130,233) (98,222) 102% Benefits (22,842) (23,465) (22,859) 97% Contractual Services (174,514) (211,070) (120,195) 83% Commodities (12,140) (25,250) (3,813) 48% Internal Services (29,084) (38,779) (28,177) 75% Depreciation (385,497) (514,000) (385,497) 75% Total Expenses (757,289) (942,797) (658,764) 80% Net Operating Income (Loss)(327,079) (382,797) (315,091) 85% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 11,000 - 0% Contrib & Transfers 1,095 1,000 940 110% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 1,095 12,000 940 9% Net Income (Loss)(325,984) (370,797) (314,151) 88% Total Cost Recovery 57%59%52% Management Cost Recovery 126%144%141% Braemar Golf Course & Dome YTD 2023 timed golf and buckets sold make up 87% of 2022 total timed golf and buckets sold. Total 2023 revenues make up 117% of budget. Total 2023 expenses make up 92% of budget. YTD 2023 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Charges for Services 9,097 - 5,210 N/A Sales 363,724 260,000 300,632 140% Memberships 296,787 130,000 252,058 228% Admissions 1,285,598 900,000 1,227,311 143% Other Fees 2,848,085 2,696,500 2,841,916 106% Building Rental 132,424 251,000 165,190 53% Equipment Rental 393,481 325,000 359,262 121% Total Revenues 5,329,195 4,562,500 5,151,579 117% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (239,613) (191,000) (222,199) 125% Salaries (1,599,510) (1,663,114) (1,412,990) 96% Benefits (376,624) (413,307) (301,452) 91% Contractual Services (742,592) (673,050) (630,312) 110% Commodities (320,764) (391,000) (274,260) 82% Equipment Rental (4,079) - - N/A Internal Services (250,598) (334,130) (241,996) 75% Depreciation (677,997) (904,000) (674,253) 75% Total Expenses (4,211,776) (4,569,601) (3,757,462) 92% Net Operating Income (Loss)1,117,420 (7,101) 1,394,118 -15736% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 9,000 8 0% Donations Non-Op - - 30,000 N/A Contrib & Transfers 46,133 53,600 43,954 86% Miscellaneous Non-Op (122) - 14,284 N/A Interest & Fiscal Charges (233,969) (179,617) (258,489) 130% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (187,958) (117,017) (170,242) 161% Net Income (Loss)929,461 (124,118) 1,223,876 -749% Total Cost Recovery 127%100%137% Management Cost Recovery 165%139%184% Revenues Liquor Grandview makes up 39% of total 2023 sales, followed by Southdale, 38%, 50th & France, 21%, and E-Commerce, 3%. YTD 2023 revenues make up 62% budget. YTD 2023 expenses make up 63% of budget. Total 2023 COGS makes up 60% of budget. Revenue down roughly 6% as compared to YTD 2022. The decrease is largely due to traffic decline, likely because of road construction projects impacting all three locations throughout summer months. YTD 2023 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Sales 9,652,600 15,665,239 10,352,865 62% Other Fees 475 - 207 N/A Total Revenues 9,653,076 15,665,239 10,353,073 62% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (6,571,190) (10,970,141) (7,206,237) 60% Salaries (1,351,325) (1,808,125) (1,234,851) 75% Benefits (407,333) (689,072) (370,477) 59% Contractual Services (543,600) (689,299) (516,769) 79% Commodities (33,024) (70,600) (83,800) 47% Internal Services (306,213) (408,284) (298,027) 75% Depreciation (87,750) (117,000) (87,750) 75% Total Expenses (9,300,436) (14,752,521) (9,797,911) 63% Net Operating Income (Loss)352,640 912,718 555,162 39% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op - 21,000 - 0% Contrib & Transfers 3,676 (996,250) 3,299 0% Miscellaneous Non-Op (177) - (0) N/A Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 3,499 (975,250) 3,299 0% Net Income (Loss)356,138 (62,532) 558,461 -570% Total Cost Recovery 104%106%106% Management Cost Recovery 108%110%110% Cost Recovery Cost recovery percentages indicate a facility’s ability to cover operating expenses with operating revenues. In 2018, the City established two cost calculations, Total Cost Recovery and Management Cost Recovery. Total Cost Recovery is calculated by dividing operating revenues by operating expenses. Operating revenues and expenses exclude non-operational items such as donations, investment income, bond interest and transfers. Management Cost Recovery is calculated by dividing operating revenues by operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, central services, and water/storm/sewer. The following charts represent total 2021, total 2022 and YTD 2023 Total Cost Recovery and Management Cost Recovery percentages. Differences between quarterly results and annual results may be due to the timing of revenues and expenses. Utility Fund • For 2023, Utility rates were restructured. The % of budget for water, sewer and storm charges lag 50% due to year-end cutoff procedures. Bills for January through March include usage from the prior year; thus, revenue is recorded in the same year as the usage. • WAC/SAC Fees are dependent upon building permits and are budgeted conservatively. WAC/SAC fees are $253K YTD comparable to PY YTD of $2.9M. • Increase in Interest & Fiscal Charges is due to the bond refunding payments. • Late fee penalties were not charged May-September due to implementation of the new billing system. Penalties were applied starting in October 2023. Utility Fund YTD 2023 2023 Budget YTD 2022 % of Budget Revenues Charges for Services 962 - - N/A Water Charges 7,105,508 9,358,369 6,534,802 76% Water Meters 859,409 - 45,494 N/A Water Penalty 34,138 23,000 78,667 148% Sewer Penalty 18,363 50,000 44,576 37% State Health Charges 101,870 100,000 101,702 102% Regular Recycling Charges 544,774 679,620 538,840 80% Sewer Charges 7,755,897 10,876,317 8,170,841 71% Storm Sewer Charges 4,309,679 5,829,916 3,865,118 74% Organics Recycling Charges 597,147 897,402 566,244 67% Water Rec Fee 152,812 700,000 1,815,988 22% Sewer Rec Fee 100,459 450,000 1,106,868 22% Certification Fee - 15,000 - 0% Other Revenue (97,217) - 18,912 N/A Total Revenues 21,483,801 28,979,624 22,888,053 74% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - - - N/A Salaries (1,409,596) (2,379,157) (1,378,976) 59% Benefits (515,599) (914,481) (496,038) 56% Contractual Services (7,590,817) (11,031,316) (7,682,007) 69% Commodities (850,538) (1,200,700) (816,157) 71% Internal Services (1,218,540) (1,624,720) (1,180,254) 75% Depreciation (4,730,238) (6,307,000) (4,595,247) 75% Total Expenses (16,315,328) (23,457,374) (16,148,678) 70% Net Operating Income (Loss)5,168,473 5,522,250 6,739,375 94% Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc Non-Op 220,178 302,000 57,623 73% Contrib & Transfers (325,001) (460,850) (251,856) 71% Miscellaneous Non-Op 119,397 200,000 106,038 60% Interest & Fiscal Charges (1,491,444) (482,749) (939,616) 309% Sale of Property 10,000 - 299 N/A Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (1,466,869) (441,599) (1,027,511) 332% Net Income (Loss)3,701,604 5,080,651 5,711,863 73% Total Cost Recovery 132%124%142% Management Cost Recovery 208%187%221% Investments The City of Edina (CoE) investments are held in various accounts: Investment Sweep – Funds not required to clear checks in the City’s checking account are automatically “swept” into this account and invested in commercial paper. The balance in this account changes daily based on the amount of checks outstanding. PFM Asset Management (PFM) – Securian was the City’s outside investment manager through June 30, 2022, replaced by PFM. They oversee a $40M portfolio for the City. These securities are held in a custodian account at U.S. Bank. Funds in this account are not needed for cash flow and can be invested in longer maturities. The benchmark for this portfolio is a combination of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Mortgage-Backed Securities Index. Allowable investments include U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to, but not including, ten years and agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). City of Edina – This account is managed internally. The balance in this account at the end of Q3 is $85.8M. The City uses a network of three institutional brokers who recommend securities in compliance with our investment policy. Funds in this account are managed primarily for cash flow purposes and annual debt service payments. Tradition - One year $245,000 FDIC insured Certificate of Deposit held at Tradition Capital Bank. 2023B – This account was created to house investment of bond proceeds at U.S. Bank. Q3 balance is $1.5M. 2021A bond proceeds of $14.4M deposited here in June 2021. Funds were needed to finance new Fire station acquisition and pre-design costs. 2023C – This account held proceeds from 2021B and 2021C for the refunding of 2013A (Public Works), 2012C (Arena) and 2013B (Golf Dome) in February 2022. Q3 Balance is $884K. 2023D – This account held proceeds from 2022A. Q3 balance is $3.9M. 2022A bond proceeds of $29.5M were deposited here in June 2022 2023E – This account held proceeds from 2023A. Q3 balance is $5.7M. 2023A bond proceeds of $11.2M were deposited here in July 2023. Funds were needed to finance lift station repairs and replacement as well as Morningside street reconstruction and water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements. The following is a breakdown of total investments by custodian as of 9/30/23: The following represents the total investment pool by security type: The following represents the same data but only for the internally managed piece under custodianship of U.S. Bank (2023A): The following are yields for current investments against a similar benchmark. The internal and external portfolios have different investment strategies. Internal - The internal is intended to remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to manage daily City cash flow as well as make debt payments. The average days to maturity for the internal portfolio is approximately two years (including the money market account). Maturities range from one day (money market) to five years. External - The external portfolio has longer term investment options to optimize return within our investment policy. The external portfolio benchmark of Bloomberg Barclays Intermediate U.S. Government/Mortgage Index represents an investment pool including U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to, but not including, ten years and agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). The average days to maturity for the external portfolio is ten years with maturities ranging from four months to 28 years. The later maturities represent mortgage-backed securities. Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: XI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Future of Operator-Assisted Calls for Public Meetings Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: City staff has been tracking the use and cost of the system that we use for operator-assisted calls to participate in community comment and public hearings at the City Council, Planning Commission and HRA. Date Meeting Number of Guests Cost 26-Oct-23 Oct. 26 HRA Meeting 0 $191 25-Oct-23 Oct. 25 Planning Commission Meeting 0 $546 17-Oct-23 Oct. 17 City Council Meeting 2 $819 12-Oct-23 Oct. 12 HRA Meeting - Cancelled 0 $19.11 11-Oct-23 Oct. 11 Planning Commission Meeting 1 $546.00 3-Oct-23 Oct. 3 City Council Meeting 2 $819 2-Oct-23 Oct. 2 Town Talk - Cancelled 0 $27 27-Sep-23 Sept. 27 P lanning Commission Meeting 0 546 19-Sep-23 Sept. 19 City Council Meeting 11 $819 13-Sep-23 Sept. 13 P lanning Commission Meeting 1 $588.94 5-Sep-23 Sept. 5 City Council Meeting 8 $682.50 24-Aug-23 Aug. 24 HRA Meeting 0 $191.10 21-Aug-23 Town Talk - Referendum 1 $273 16-Aug-23 Aug. 16 Planning Commission Meeting 3 $546.76 15-Aug-23 Aug. 15 City Council Meeting 0 $819 10-Aug-23 Aug. 10 HRA Meeting 0 $201 2-Aug-23 Aug. 2 City Council Meeting 1 $819 26-Jul-23 July 26 Planning Commission Meeting 3 $819 20-Jul-23 July 20 HRA Meeting - Cancelled 0 $19.11 18-Jul-23 July 18 City Council Meeting 4 $819 17-Jul-23 Town Talk - Police Operations 5 $273 The table reflects cost and user information for a sample of 2023 City Council, Planning Commission and HRA meetings. Staff seek direction on whether to continue this service using this tool, use different technology such as Webex or discontinue the practice of allowing people to call in during 2024.