HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-06-27 Evironmental Quality Commission Meeting MinutesENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
Special Meeting
June 27, 1973, 5:30 P.M.
Edina Village Hall
In the absence of the Chairman, John Telfer, Secretary of the
Commission, called the meeting to order with the following members
present:
Fred Richards
Earl Carson
Fritz Reid
Virginia Scott
Staff Present: Gary West
Bob Sandilla
Ron Hays (entered Meeting 6:18P.M,
John Telfer
SPECIAL BUSINESS
A. Relocation Realty (Braemar Hill Homes). Acting Chairman, John
Telfer, suggested that the Commission members should now have had
adequate time to make the necessary personal inspection of the site
and review the proposal as presented to the Commission June 25. -He
asked if there were questions which should be directed to the staff
or if the Commission was ready to act on the staff's recommendations
or formulate its own recommendations to forward to the Planning
Commission.
Fred Richards requested clarification of the provisions of the
Southwest Edina Plan as adopted by the Village Council and the pro-
posal's compliance or noncompliance with that plan. Mr. West replied
that the proposal was well within the perimeters set forth in the
Southwest Edina Plan and provided for somewhat less that maximum
density permitted in the Plan for that property. He went on to
clarify the proposed alignment of Gleason Road and the relationship
of the project to Braemar Park.
Mr. Richards suggested that he would like to see the precedent
established in this portion of Southwest Edina of densities less
than the maximum densities permitted in the Southwest Edina Plan.
Mr. Telfer agreed with Mr. Richards stating that he was
particularly concerned about the buildings proposed adjacent to
the pond on the eastern portion of the property.
The Commissioners during further discussion expressed dis-
pleasure with the proposed density of the project and fear that
Environmental Quality Commission -2- June 27, 1973
the project might detract visually from Braemar Park. Bob
Sandilla questioned the concern of Mr. Richards over the density
when the proposal was for.7 units / acre more that would be
permitted on the property under its present R-1 single family
zoning. Mr. Richards replied, that considering the problems of
traffic and other factors, he questioned if a lower density might
not be more appropriate. He questioned if it was proper for the
EQC to bow to a developer's attempt to maximize the dollar return
on his investment. Mr. Sandilla inquired as to what density
would be considered appropriate.
Considerable discussion among the Commission members ensued,
culminating with Virginia Scott asking the Commissioners to be
polled to see if they were reaching any unanimity of opinion.
Mrs. Scott moved and Bob Sandilla seconded that the EQC recommend
concept approval of the Relocation Realty proposal at its re-
quested 4.7 unit / acre density. Motion failed, 3 ayes, 4 nays.
After further discussion, Virginia Scott moved and Fritz
Reid seconded that,"the EQC forward the recommendation to the
Planning Commission that they require the preservation of the
heights of the hills, the protection of the slopes and the reten-
tion of the ponds in as natural condition as practicable. Further-
more, that; the plans developed by the proponents to accomplish
these ends to be submitted to the EQC for review prior to approval
of the Final Development. Plans".
Discussion was held on the motion. Mrs. Scott moved to
amend her motion by adding, "the EQC recommends the approval of
the concept and that . . .". The motion as amended was approved
with 6 ayes and 1 nay.
Bob Sandilla moved and Fred Richards seconded that, "the EQC
further recommends to the Planning Commission that consideration
be given to a reduction of density in the proposal to accomplish
the protection of the natural slopes, the hills and the ponds on
the site". Motion approved unanimously.
Bob Sandilla moved the meeting be adjourned. Seconded by
Virginia Scott. Motion carried unanimously.