Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-12-08 HRA Regular Meeting PacketAg enda E dina H ousing and R edevelopm ent Author ity City of E dina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers Thursday, Decem ber 8, 2022 7:30 AM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. To Participate in Comm unity Comm ent Call 786-496-5601 E nter Conference PIN 5221053# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. An operator will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call to Ord er II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegia n ce IV.Ap p roval of Meetin g Agen d a V.Com m unity Com m en t Du ring "Com m unity Com m en t," th e Edin a Housing and Redevelop m ent Au thority (HRA) will in vite resid ents to sh are new issues or con cern s tha t h aven't been con sid ered in th e p ast 30 da y s b y th e HRA or w h ich a ren't slated for fu ture consideration . Individ u als m u st lim it their com m ents to three m inutes. Th e Ch air m a y lim it the num ber of sp ea kers on th e sa m e issue in th e interest of tim e a n d topic. Gen era lly sp ea king, item s tha t are elsewhere on tod ay's a genda m a y not b e addressed d u ring Com m unity Com m en t. In d ividua ls sh ould not expect th e Ch air or Com m issioners to resp ond to th eir com m en ts toda y . Instead the Com m issioners m ight refer the m atter to sta. for consideration a t a fu ture m eeting. A.E xecu tive Director's Resp onse to Com m u n ity Com m ents VI.Ad option of Con sen t Agenda All a genda item s listed on the consent a genda a re con sid ered rou tin e and will be en acted by one m otion. There will be no sepa rate d iscussion of such item s unless requested to be rem oved from the Con sen t Agenda by a Com m ission er of the HRA. In su ch ca ses the item w ill b e rem oved from th e Consent Agen d a and con sid ered im m ediately follow ing the a d option of th e Consent Agen d a. (Fa vorable rollcall vote of m a jority of Com m issioners p resent to approve.) A.Dra ft Min u tes of Regular Meeting Novem ber 17, 2022 B.Approve 2023 Calenda r of Meetin g a n d Religiou s Observance Dates C.Approve E n tering into a Ma ster Services Agreem en t with Th e Fina n cial Services Consu lting Group D.Req u est for Purch ase: Cha n ge Order #1 E d en Aven u e Landsca p ing E.Req u est for Purch ase: Cha n ge Order #1 E d en Aven u e Im provem ents F.Req u est for Purch ase: Cha n ge Order #1 Gra n d view Pedestria n Brid ge VII.Reports/Recom m enda tions: (Favora b le vote of m ajority of Com m ission ers p resent to approve excep t where n oted) A.Approva l of Redevelop m ent Agreem en t for Multifam ily Housing at 4620 W est 77th Street B.Approve Am en d m ents to New Multifam ily A.ord able Housing Policy VIII.Executive Director's Com m ents IX.HRA Com m issioners' Com m en ts X.Ad jou rn m ent Th e E d ina Housing a n d Redevelop m ent Au thority wa n ts all pa rticip ants to be com fortable b ein g pa rt of th e p u b lic p rocess. If y ou n ee d a ssista n ce in the w a y of h ea ring am pli@ca tion, a n in terp reter, large-p rint docum en ts or som ethin g else, p lease ca ll 952-927-8861 72 hou rs in advance of the m eeting. Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: O ther F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Exec utive Director's R espons e to C ommunity C omments Information Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Executive Director N eal will respond to questions asked at the previous H R A meeting. Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: F rom: Item Activity: Subject:Draft Minutes of R egular Meeting November 17, 2022 Action Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the draft minutes of regular H R A meeting November 17, 2022 I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Minutes of Regular Meeting November 17, 2022 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 17, 2022 7:30 A.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:32 a.m. then explained the processes created for public comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, and Chair Hovland. Absent: Commissioner Staunton. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED - AS PRESENTED Motion by Commissioner Jackson, seconded by Commissioner Pierce, approving the meeting agenda as presented. Roll call: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, and Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED - AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the consent agenda as presented: V.A. Approve Draft Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 13, 2022 V.B. 4040 W. 70th Acquisition Loan Forgiveness V.C. Certificate of Completion – Brainerd Enterprises LLC dba Mann Theaters Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, and Hovland Motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. LOAN AGREEMENT WITH EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - APPROVED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf said this item pertained to funding to support renovation and re-occupancy of a portion of vacant commercial property. This type of funding was possible using the SPARC program. He shared the objectives and SPARC outcomes that included support of entrepreneurial economy and small businesses, occupancy of a vacant office building, job creation, and established revolving loan fund for future HRA projects. He shared a brief description of the Lab with an $800,000 construction budget and anticipated loan amount of $650,000 to $725,000 then noted they were unable to secure traditional debt financing. Mr. Neuendorf summarized the loan terms of seven-year minimum with construction to be completed by June 2023 and repayment to begin June 2023 then reviewed a summary of loan forgiveness in detail. He said when completed, the space would host a small business development facility that included the Edina Innovation Lab and would be operated by the Edina Chamber of Commerce. Lori Syverson, Edina Chamber of Commerce, thanked the Council for the opportunity to share more on the proposed loan agreement. She shared their work with Edina Public Schools to formulate an entrepreneurial program for students and their intent to work with the HRA planning Minutes/HRA/November 17, 2022 Page 2 The Lab based on their goals and those of the City. She said they intended to offer The Lab to Edina businesses but would be open to HRA’s input and said they had $105,000 pledged to date. Ms. Syverson spoke about the impacts to businesses from COVID-19 and how things have changed which resulted in ways to innovate and required strategic action from business leaders because survival of businesses was at stake. She reviewed their revenue and expenses and said the pilot program has been successful and was needed then shared what other cities were doing in the area to build for the future. Paul Moody, Edina Chamber of Commerce, presented more details on the proposal and the importance of giving back to the community and being a partner with the community through an organization that was believed in. He said Edina had a strong and healthy business community and that The Lab would be a critical economic development tool. Annette Wildenaur, Edina Chamber of Commerce, said she loved to watch businesses innovate and grow and would work to create a roadmap to grow businesses to the next level. She said they had people on a waiting list and would be governed under the Chamber and would include ownership and leadership in any sector. She outlined the proposed curriculum that would be experiential learning and include finance, marketing, human resources, strategic thinking, and more and said The Lab would fill a need, was sustainable, and provided an ability to pivot. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Motion by Commissioner Jackson, seconded by Commissioner Pierce, to approve loan agreement with Edina Chamber of Commerce to establish the Edina Innovation Lab at 7201 Metro Avenue as presented. Roll call: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, and Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. UPDATED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY - APPROVED Mr. Neuendorf stated his item pertained to the future use of Tax Increment Financing in Edina and noted the policy was last updated in 2011. He reviewed the objectives of the updated policy which would clarify the intent and purpose for when TIF could be used, clarified the review process, set expectations, identified parameters, clarified minimum expectations for developers, and established clear financial guidelines. He said the policy defined the public benefit for transformational change which required a huge investment and included reporting for transparency. Mr. Neuendorf said the parameters for a new district would limit the size and scope of a district and include community engagement and early de-certification when possible. He outlined minimum expectations such as public parking but not exclusively private parking and would include clear financial guidelines. He said staff recommended the policy be updated to reflect current practice of using TIF only when necessary to deliver public benefits and if approved would be forwarded to the City Council for formal adoption. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Motion by Commissioner Jackson, seconded by Commissioner Pierce, to approve the updated policy to be followed when considering the use of Tax Increment Financing as presented. Roll call: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S COMMENTS – Received Minutes/HRA/November 17, 2022 Page 3 VIII.A. POTENTIAL PROGRAMS FOR SPARC FUND VIII.B. HRA PROJECT STATUS UPDATE VIII.C. PENTAGON VILLAGE LOT 4 UPDATE VIII.D. STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTING HOUSING STRATEGY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS IX. HRA COMMISSIONER COMMENTS – Received IX.A. OPEN TO BUSINESS MID-YEAR REPORT X. ADJOURNMENT Motion made by Commissioner Pierce, seconded by Commissioner Jackson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 a.m. Roll call: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, and Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Approve 2023 C alendar of Meeting and R eligious O bservanc e Dates Ac tion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the 2023 calendar of meetings for the C ity C ouncil, C ommissions, and days of religious observance. I N TR O D U C TI O N: H R A B ylaws requires designation of a fixed place and determination of dates for regular meetings. M eeting location and dates are: M ost regular meeting location is in the C ouncil Chambers, City H all, 7:30-9 a.m. M eetings dates for 2023 are: Jan 5 and 19 F eb 2 and 16 M arch 9 and 23 April 13 and 27 M ay 18 June 8 and 22 July 20 Aug 10 and 24 S ept 14 and 28 Oct 12 and 26 Nov 16 and 30 Dec 14 Work S ession meetings are scheduled as needed and meeting location is the C ommunity R oom, C ity Hall, 7:30-8:15 a.m., generally. T he work session adjourns in the C ommunity R oom and the regular meeting begins in the Council C hambers. AT TAC HME N T S: Description 2023 Meeting Calendar JANUARY Jan. 1 New Year’s Day Jan. 2 New Year’s Day (observed) Jan. 3 City Council Jan. 5 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Jan. 9 Community Health Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Jan. 10 Parks & Recreation Commission Jan. 11 Planning Commission Jan. 12 Energy & Environment Commission Jan. 16 Martin Luther King Jr. Day Jan. 17 City Council Jan. 19 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission Jan. 24 Human Rights & Relations Commission Jan. 25 Planning Commission Jan. 26 Arts & Culture Commission FEBRUARY Feb. 2 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Feb. 7 City Council Feb. 8 Planning Commission Feb. 9 Energy & Environment Commission Feb. 13 Community Health Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Feb. 14 Parks & Recreation Commission Feb. 16 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission Feb. 20 Presidents’ Day Feb. 21 City Council Feb. 22 Planning Commission Feb. 23 Arts & Culture Commission Feb. 28 Human Rights & Relations Commission MARCH March 7 City Council March 9 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority March 13 Community Health Commission March 14 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission March 15 Planning Commission March 16 Transportation Commission March 21 City Council March 23 Housing & Redevelopment Authority March 28 Human Rights & Relations Commission March 29 Planning Commission March 30 Arts & Culture Commission APRIL April 4 City Council April 5-7 Passover (Jewish) April 7 Good Friday (Christian) April 10 Community Health Commission April 11 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission April 12 Planning Commission April 13 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Energy & Environment Commission April 18 City Council April 20 Transportation Commission Board of Appeal and Equalization April 22 Eid al Fitr (Muslim) April 25 Human Rights & Relations Commission April 26 Planning Commission April 27 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority MAY May 2 City Council May 4 Board of Appeal and Equalization May 9 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission May 10 Planning Commission May 11 Energy & Environment Commission May 15 Community Health Commission May 16 City Council May 18 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission May 23 Human Rights & Relations Commission May 24 Planning Commission May 25 Arts & Culture Commission May 29 Memorial Day JUNE June 6 City Council June 8 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority June 12 Community Health Commission June 13 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission June 14 Planning Commission June 15 Transportation Commission June 19 Juneteenth June 20 City Council June 22 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority June 27 Human Rights & Relations Commission June 28 Planning Commission June 29 Eid al-Adha (Muslim) 2023 Meeting Calendar Religious Observance*Holiday City Council or Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Board or Commission Meeting(s) Election Day** Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 19 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 9 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30 13 27 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 18 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 22 8 * No public meetings held. **No public meetings after 6 p.m. 2023 Meeting Calendar Religious Observance*Holiday City Council or Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Board or Commission Meeting(s) Election Day** * No public meetings held. **No public meetings after 6 p.m. JULY July 4 Independence Day July 10 Community Health Commission July 11 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission July 12 Planning Commission July 13 Energy & Environment Commission July 18 City Council July 20 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Transportation Commission July 25 Human Rights & Relations Commission July 26 Planning Commission July 27 Arts & Culture Commission AUGUST Aug. 1 Night to Unite Aug. 2 City Council Aug. 8 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Aug. 10 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Energy & Environment Commission Aug. 14 Community Health Commission Aug. 15 City Council Aug. 16 Planning Commission Aug. 17 Transportation Commission Aug. 22 Human Rights & Relations Commission Aug. 24 Arts & Culture Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Aug. 30 Planning Commission SEPTEMBER Sept. 4 Labor Day Sept. 5 City Council Sept. 11 Community Health Commission Sept. 12 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Sept. 13 Planning Commission Sept. 14 Energy & Environment Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority Sept. 16-17 Rosh Hashanah (Jewish) Sept. 19 City Council Sept. 21 Transportation Commission Sept. 25 Yom Kippur (Jewish) Sept. 26 Human Rights & Relations Commission Sept. 27 Planning Commission Sept. 28 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Arts & Culture Commission OCTOBER Oct. 3 City Council Oct. 9 Community Health Commission Oct. 10 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Oct. 11 Planning Commission Oct. 12 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Energy & Environment Commission Oct. 17 City Council Oct. 24 Human Rights & Relations Commission Oct. 25 Planning Commission Oct. 26 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Arts & Culture Commission Transportation Commission NOVEMBER Nov. 7 Election Day (School District) Nov. 8 City Council Nov. 9 Energy & Environment Commission Nov. 10 Veterans Day (observed) Nov. 11 Veterans Day Nov. 13 Community Health Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Nov. 14 Diwali (Hindu) Nov. 15 Planning Commission Nov. 16 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Arts & Culture Commission Transportation Commission Nov. 21 City Council Human Rights & Relations Commission Nov. 23 Thanksgiving Nov. 24 Day after Thanksgiving Nov. 30 Housing & Redevelopment Authority DECEMBER Dec. 5 City Council Human Rights & Relations Commission Dec. 11 City Council Dec. 12 Heritage Preservation Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Dec. 13 Community Health Commission Planning Commission Dec. 14 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Arts & Culture Commission Energy & Environment Commission Dec. 19 City Council Dec. 21 Transportation Commission Dec. 22 Christmas Eve (observed) Dec. 24 Christmas Eve (Christian) Dec. 25 Christmas (Christian) Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 5 14 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 21 16 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 12 26 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 3028 14 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10 24 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 20 Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.C . To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:S tephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Entering into a Mas ter S ervic es Agreement with T he F inanc ial S ervices C onsulting G roup Ac tion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve engaging T he F inancial S ervices C onsulting Group and authorize attorney to finalize the M aster S ervice Agreement for execution. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S taff engaged with T he Financial Services Consulting G roup (T F S C G ) to assist the C ity with assessing the current state of the our single-family and multi-family affordable housing strategies and near-term and longer-term opportunities, bench-marking these against best practices and recent innovative solutions, developing alternative strategies for addressing any “gaps” (including the development of high-level implementation roadmaps), and facilitating the selection strategies moving forward. S taff is seeking allocation of up to $35,000, approval of the Statement of Work and authorization for the C ity Attorney to work with T he Financial Services G roup on finalizing the you on finalizing the M aster S ervices Agreement for execution. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Statement of Work Project Proposal Pres entation December 8, 2022 Chair and Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Approve Entering into a Master Services Agreement with The Financial Services Consulting Group Information / Background: Staff has been seeking a more sustainable fund for financing affordable housing across the spectrum of single family to multifamily, new construction and preservation, and ownership and rental, that are discussed in the Comprehensive Plan and the Housing Strategy Task Force Implementation Plan. To fulfill the Plans’ objectives requires financial resources. Our funding mechanisms are currently reliant on Buy-In funds, pooled TIF, the creation of new TIF districts, and commitments from funding partners, such as Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Council and Minnesota Housing – all of whom experience a demand that far exceeds the supply of funds. Existing City funding sources ebb and flow with no great predictability on future availability resulting in every funding approval carrying a risk of insufficient funding for future, unknown, developments. As expressed at previous HRA meetings, a more secure and reliable source of funding is desirable. The Financial Services Consulting Group (TFSCG) is a locally based consulting firm that works nationwide in a wide variety of arenas, including assisting municipalities and nonprofits on affordable housing financing. Most recognizably, TFSCG helped with the creation of the Greater Minnesota Housing Fund. Council Member Pierce and Staff met with them to discuss assisting the City with assessing the current state of the our single-family and multi-family affordable housing strategies and near-term and longer-term opportunities, benchmarking these against best practices and recent innovative solutions (including the affordable housing preservation program with Bremer Bank and others, and including the engagement of additional representative programs within the region and other select regions nationally to share various programmatic best practices), developing alternative strategies for addressing any “gaps” (including the development of high-level implementation roadmaps), and facilitating the selection of strategies moving forward. Budget: Hourly fee, aggregate not to exceed $35,000. Source: ARPA as included in the 2023 budget and approved on December 6, 2022. Recommendation: Staff seeks approval of engaging The Financial Services Consulting Group per their Statement of Work and authorizing the City Attorney to finalize the Mater Services Agreement for execution in an amount not to exceed $35,000. CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 1 OF 6 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT STATEMENT OF WORK GENERAL SCOPE CITY OF EDINA AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES & ALTERNATIVES CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT AND ROADMAP (PHASE I) This Statement of Work (“SOW”) is issued to detail the Deliverables and/or Services to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Master Services Agreement (“Agreement”), dated ___________________, between THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, having an office at 100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1900, Minneapolis MN 55402 (“Consultant”), and CITY OF EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Minnesota public corporation (“HRA”), having an office at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 (“Customer”). To assist in this initiative, THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG), a Minneapolis-based management consulting firm with a strong history in supporting the financial services and non-profit sectors has been retained to support this effort. This effort will be led by the teams from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) in support of the overall City OF EDINA sponsors and working team, with involvement from the various corporate areas and functional business lines. Further, it is anticipated that this effort will utilize an iterative approach, and its team will actively engage and provide thought partnership with the CITY OF EDINA leadership. The first phase and related goals of the Affordable Housing Strategies - Assessment & Roadmap effort are to (a) establish the baseline and solutions alternatives through collaboration with the City of Edina teams, and to (b) ensure an implementable go-forward strategy is determined to support the City’s growth goals. The proposed approach for this initiative is outlined as follows, and which may be revised based on findings and stakeholder direction as the effort progresses. Project Kickoff and Planning // The planning phase is designed to: i) finalize the goals, objectives, and scope of the initiative, ii) finalize the internal and external staffing of the project team, iii) develop the project plan and related project management documents, iv) finalize the project budget, and establish the project steering, oversight and management process. These activities are envisioned to be accomplished through a combination of facilitated working sessions and offline preparation. Due to the nature of this initiative, it is assumed this will be an accelerated process and that assessment activities will begin during this phase as well. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include participation in a facilitated working session, and periodic reviews as the effort progresses. Part I. Baseline Assessment and Leveraging Community Practices // A preliminary baseline of the current single-family and multi-family affordable housing strategies and environment in the City of Edina will be performed and documented. Deliverable 1. Baseline Assessment. This assessment will benchmark against various community best practices based upon the goals and objectives established in the planning phase, confirming potential limiting factors of currently deployed funding strategies. The baseline assessment will be created to develop alternative strategies for best practices in single-family and multi-family affordable housing programs and strategies and ultimately to an implementation roadmap. Additionally, it leverages experience with communities across the country in addressing systemic challenges to affordable housing including: CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 2 OF 6 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT i) accessing access to capital, including leading various local and national community lending and capital structuring efforts, ii) identifying the potential impact of non-profit community development organizations and financial intermediaries for affordable housing providers, and iii) evaluating financial institutions, that serve cities and local government as well as philanthropic foundations, that work with public and private organizations that invest in impact areas. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include participation in targeted and facilitated working sessions, including active input into the baseline assessment, and active input and review of the draft findings. Additional stakeholders may be identified for participation in these as appropriate, based on the nature of the programs currently in place. Deliverable 2. Leveraging Community Practices. As referenced above, framing the baseline assessment against various best practices and recent innovative solutions in single-family and multi-family affordable housing programs and strategies is an important component to creating an executable implementation roadmap. This includes representation or engagement of initiatives such as: (i) innovative and nationally recognized affordable housing programs from leading organizations locally (e.g. Bremer Bank, Aeon, Sunrise Banks, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, City of Lakes Community Land Trust / Homes Within Reach, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, etc.) (ii) leading organizations from other regions and including national intermediaries (e.g. Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership (ANDP), Housing Partnership Network (HPN), Homewise, Community Reinvestment Fund, LISC, Community Housing Capital (CHC), NeighborWorks America, BlueHub Capital, Capital Impact Partners, LIIF, Mercy Housing, etc.) and others in the non-profit arena (iii) additional representative mission-aligned private developers. Together, these provide an invaluable foundation of learning to establish a baseline assessment of the current state, better understand the challenges and opportunities involved, and ultimately create the highest likelihood of programmatic success. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include a facilitated working session including active input and review of a draft list of organizations / programs for engagement, optional participation in any select discussions with targeted organizations / programs, a facilitated working session active input and review of highlighted efforts for alignment with City of Edina objectives and potential leverage. Part II. Execution Alternatives // Alternative execution strategies will be created and documented that benchmark desired outcomes against the current baseline (leaving as-is). Deliverable 3. Execution Alternatives. Each alternative will define and plan for different scenarios that again leverage best practices for community-based affordable housing initiatives. The execution alternatives will examine an extensive set of merits and considerations that includes programmatic objectives (e.g. access, racial equity, etc.), risk and cost considerations, community goodwill, access to capital, infrastructure and tax attributes as well as many other factors. Community best practices as well as critical learnings and risks of different approaches will be documented in each of the alternatives and including quadrant analysis. Decision-making criteria will be developed across key CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 3 OF 6 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT stakeholders to help define optimal execution strategies for further assessment, refinement, and implementation aligned to affordable housing desired outcomes. Decision makers will have a detailed set of considerations, including practical learnings from other initiatives, to aid in assessing which of the various alternatives best aligns with the goals and objectives of the City of Edina. Each alternative will document scope and critical dependencies on execution as any approach to impact affordable housing in a community involves complex and interrelated public and private stakeholders that often struggle to find near and long-term alignment. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include a facilitated working session including active input and review of a preliminary draft of execution alternatives, co-development of the decision-making framework, and a facilitated working session including active input and review of final recommended execution alternatives for alignment with City of Edina objectives. Part III. Implementation Roadmap // A series of planning assumptions integrated with preliminary pro-forma will be developed across these alternatives and provide core input to an implementation roadmap. Deliverable 4. Implementation Roadmap. The implementation roadmap will provide the blueprint to execute upon the goals and objectives set forth in the planning phase. This includes key planning assumptions, key decisions, ideal stakeholders, steps required to create and optimally manage the funding programs. As discussed in the execution alternatives, to be successful, affordable housing programs must deeply understand the role that city plays in relation to the other key public and private stakeholders and have a set of strategies to adapt and adjust to attain and maintain alignment to shared affordable housing objectives. A critical component is understanding the complexities of capital flows and how to structure public and private investment criteria into an action plan with specific goals and milestones that tie interdependent stakeholders to the same outcomes. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include a facilitated working session including active input and review of a preliminary draft of execution alternatives, co-development of the decision-making framework, and a facilitated working session including active input and review of final recommended execution alternatives for alignment with City of Edina objectives. Detailed scope documents will be developed as required for each of these areas during the planning and implementation modeling phase of this initiative. Acceptance Criteria: To be determined during the completion and turnover phase of the project. CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 4 OF 6 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (for use with Master Services Agreement dated January 2023) AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES & ALTERNATIVES CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT AND ROADMAP (PHASE I) BUDGET AND TERMS Term/Period of Performance: Start Date: 3 January 2023 End Date: 15 March 2023 (est.) Statement of Work Type: Time & Materials (No Ceiling) Statement of Work Value: No Stated Value. Billed Per Rates Below Time & Materials Rate Schedule: For any time spent from the project launch through the completion of the work for this first phase as outlined in the Statement of Work, the following fee schedule will apply. ROLE RESOURCE EST. UTILIZATION DAILY RATE ADJUSTED RATE ENGAGEMENT LEAD DONOVAN WALSH ½ -1 DAY / WEEK $ 2,360 / DAY $ 2,000 / DAY MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT DAN BRYANT ½ - 2½ DAYS / WEEK $1,760 / DAY $1,480 / DAY SR. BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSTS MARY HERFURTH DAN QUINN (AD HOC) $1,560 / DAY $1,000 / DAY $1,120 / DAY $720 / DAY Daily rates assume an eight-hour day for any time spent through the completion of the work as outlined in the Statement of Work. Any reimbursable expenses (typical travel-related and other business-related expenses) will be included on these invoices, and will not be subject to an administrative mark-up. Significant expenses will be pre-approved with the customer as appropriate. The initial projection for Milestone 1 and Milestone 2, completing the baseline analysis and developing execution alternatives is estimated between $20,000 and $30,000, and is largely dependent on the complexity of underlying requirements and stakeholder guidance, and depth of analysis suitable to develop the recommendations. The initial projection for Milestone 3, which will develop the implementation roadmap based on the strategy path(s) determined, is estimated at around $5,000, and which will be revised based on findings and stakeholder direction. Together, the initial projection for Phase I across these milestones, is estimated at between $25,000 and $35,000. These initial estimates are comparable to similar projects undertaken by the teams from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP. CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 5 OF 6 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT Customer Information: Name: City of Edina Work Location: Various locations, including on customer premises, traveling, and both TFSCG and TFSCG subcontractor premises. Contact Name: Stephanie Hawkinson Phone: (952) 833-9578 Consultant Provided Third Party Technology: Yes Includes software related to project management and project communications, including: Microsoft Project, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, and e-mail. Also includes additional technologies as appropriate, such as web-conferencing and online collaboration tools. If additional project-related third party technology is required above and beyond a standard engagement, consultant will review requirements with customer and determine appropriate course of action. Customer Provided Third Party Technology: TBD May include additional technologies as appropriate, including conference call bridges, etc. Customer Provided Equipment: Yes While working onsite, includes network access for consultant-provided laptops / personal computers, office phones, FAX machines, printers, copiers, etc. Consultant Provided Equipment: Yes Consultants will provide own laptops / personal computers, office / mobile phones, FAX machines, printers, copiers, etc. as appropriate. Customer may be invoiced for project-related expenses as appropriate (e.g. photocopies, preparation of marketing materials, etc.). If additional project-related equipment is required above and beyond a standard engagement, consultant will review requirements with customer and determine appropriate course of action. Payment Schedule: Invoices will be submitted to Customer from Consultant on a monthly basis for all work performed and actual reimbursable expenses incurred to-date. Customer Invoice Address: City of Edina Attn: Stephanie Hawkinson 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Consultant Primary Contact: Contact Name: Donovan Walsh Phone: (612) 564-0001 Customer Primary Contact: Contact Name: Stephanie Hawkinson Phone: (952) 833-9578 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 6 OF 6 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT Additional Terms: Customer acknowledges that under this Agreement it is not requesting and that Consultant and its affiliates are not providing the following services or advice, including but not limited to, accounting, valuation, tax or legal. In addition, Customer understands and agrees that Consultant is not acting as a financial advisor or fiduciary agent but, instead, is solely providing advice in the capacity of an arm’s-length contractual counterparty to Customer. Accordingly, any estimates and analysis provided by Consultant are for preliminary discussion purposes only and will not be considered by Customer as investment advice or any form of recommendation to buy, sell or participate in any transactions. Customer agrees it will not rely on Consultant provided estimates and analysis but will either consult professionals licensed in the respective area of inquiry or subject matter and/or make its own determination regarding matters such as valuations and/or corresponding entries reflected on Customer's books and records, or for any other purpose. This Statement of Work will be effective and become an integral part of the Agreement upon signature of an authorized representative of both parties. This Statement of Work supersedes any and all previous or contemporaneous agreements and understandings with respect to the subject matter of this Statement of Work (provided that the Agreement remains in full force and effect). This Statement of Work performs the same function as a purchase order. CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 1 OF 20 CITY OF EDINA AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES & ALTERNATIVES CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT AND ROADMAP (PHASE I) DISCUSSION DRAFT / PROPOSED APPROACH 10 NOVEMBER 2022 PROVIDED BY PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 2 OF 20 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) is pleased to provide this proposed approach to assist the CITY OF EDINA with assessing the current state of the City’s single-family and multi-family affordable housing strategies and near-term and longer-term opportunities, benchmarking these against best practices and recent innovative solutions (including the affordable housing preservation program with Bremer Bank and others, and including the engagement of additional representative programs within the region and other select regions nationally to share various programmatic best practices), developing alternative strategies for addressing any “gaps” (including the development of high-level implementation roadmaps), and facilitating the selection of go-forward strategies. THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) is a management consulting firm specializing in managing business and market transitions. We help our clients realize opportunities presented by change. These include new business and product launches, mergers and acquisitions, market changes, international expansion, and corporate restructuring. THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) has both an industry-leading financial services practice focused on providing solutions to the nation's leading financial institutions, and a nationally recognized practice in the areas of community development, small business lending, affordable housing, and neighborhood stabilization. In addition to having an extensive background in banking, capital markets, and product development, in related efforts, the teams from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) have been assisting communities across the country in successfully addressing challenges in accessing capital, including leading various local and national community lending and capital structuring efforts, for non-profit community development organizations and financial intermediaries, for affordable housing providers, for financial institutions, for cities and local governments, for philanthropic foundations, and within the private and institutional impact investing areas. This includes national, regional and local efforts, including work with NeighborWorks America, The Housing Partnership Network, LISC, Capital Impact Partners / Momentus Capital, Community Reinvestment Fund, The Kresge Foundation, and numerous national financial institutions, regional and community-based financial institutions, and with other financial services providers. Further, the teams worked with the leading national non-profit housing intermediaries to develop and launch the National Community Stabilization Trust. This effort also included leading the creation of an industry- wide consortium of financial institutions, government and non-profit providers, focused on stabilizing at-risk communities and preserving affordable housing in hundreds of communities across the nation. EXPERTS IN FINANCIAL SERVICES WITH A PASSION FOR SUPPORTING OUR COMMUNITIES In short, we recognize and understand the complex nature of the CITY OF EDINA and its sponsors, funders, and community partners and constituents, and have both depth and expertise in the financial services environment, and in the arenas of community development and affordable housing, small business development and jobs creation, and environmental sustainability. THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) brings the experience necessary to work effectively with this complexity and to help develop solutions that work. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 3 OF 20 SOLUTIONS COMPONENTS AND APPROACH The first phase and related goals of the Affordable Housing Strategies - Assessment & Roadmap effort are to (a) establish the baseline and solutions alternatives through collaboration with the CITY OF EDINA teams, and to (b) ensure an implementable go-forward strategy is determined to support the City’s growth goals. Additional detail on these efforts is outlined as follows. Baseline Assessment // This includes undertaking a preliminary baseline of the current single-family and multi-family affordable housing strategies and near-term and longer-term opportunities, and outlining stakeholder and constituent expectations (strategic plans, city council, neighborhood feedback, business / workforce housing objectives, etc.). These are then benchmarked against various industry best practices, confirming potential limiting factors of currently deployed funding strategies, developing alternative strategies for addressing any “gaps” or areas to consider strengthening that are aligned to the goals and objectives of the City of Edina. Leveraging Community Practices // This includes engagement and framing various best practices and recent innovative solutions, and demonstrate how these models and strategies could help address current limiting factors. This includes the engagement of additional representative programs within the region and other select regions nationally to share programmatic best practices in single-family and multi-family affordable housing programs and strategies. This further includes the affordable housing preservation program with Bremer Bank and others, and targeting engagement of leading organizations locally (e.g. Aeon, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, City of Lakes Community Land Trust / Homes Within Reach, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, etc.) and from other regions and including national intermediaries (e.g. Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership (ANDP), Housing Partnership Network (HPN), Homewise, Community Reinvestment Fund, LISC, Community Housing Capital (CHC), NeighborWorks America, BlueHub Capital, Capital Impact Partners, LIFF, Mercy Housing, etc.) and others in the non-profit arena, with additional representative mission-aligned private developers. Execution Alternatives // A set of execution strategies will then be assessed from the baseline assessment (leaving as-is), based upon levels of investment, scope, and impact. Execution alternatives will leverage experience with community programs across the country to evaluate the pros and cons of different approaches as well as mitigation best practices to manage downside risk and maximize programmatic impact, and including quadrant analysis. The execution alternatives create a gap analysis between the baseline assessment and community best practices that enable a set of options to be created and evaluated by decision makers. Implementation Roadmap // With this, a series of planning assumptions integrated with preliminary pro-forma will be developed across the execution alternatives. Key decision-making criteria will be determined across the stakeholders to help determine optimal execution strategies for further assessment, refinement, and implementation. The implementation roadmap will build upon the learning and application of proven models and frameworks for low-income housing in other communities supported by the baseline assessment of the City of Edina. The roadmap will define incremental phases that enable evaluation against objectives and allows for adaptation and adjustment based upon implementation learnings. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 4 OF 20 Additional subsequent activities could include the following major components, and will be planned for separately as the initiative progresses: - Expanding this pilot implementation of the program with select participants in targeted markets, for the purposes of testing key planning assumptions in advance of a full rollout. - Revising the rollout framework based on lessons-learned from the pilot implementations. - Undertaking the full rollout leading and coordinating with regional and nationwide implementations of the program as this effort continues to engage key implementation partners and capital providers. The planning and execution objectives used in developing this approach include: - managing the initiative to minimize the range of alternatives to focus on leading options in the initial phase of assessment, and selectively undertaking any “deep dives” where necessary, while simultaneously maximizing the qualitative aspects of the resulting analysis and recommendations to ensure a directionally representative analysis and recommendation, and - providing a clear and concise status of the initiative throughout to both the CITY OF EDINA leadership team and the respective stakeholders of the working groups. These goals and objectives will be updated during the inception of the project. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 5 OF 20 PROJECT RESOURCES To assist in this initiative, THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG), a Minneapolis-based management consulting firm with a strong history in supporting the financial services and non-profit sectors has been retained to support this effort. This effort will be led by the teams from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) in support of the overall City OF EDINA sponsors and working team, with involvement from the various corporate areas and functional business lines. Further, it is anticipated that this effort will utilize an iterative approach, and its team will actively engage and provide thought partnership with the CITY OF EDINA leadership. Leading the teams for the initiative, Donovan Walsh, with an extensive background in banking, capital markets, mergers and acquisitions, and leading strategic change management efforts, will serve as the Engagement Manager from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) and will be responsible for: - establishing management, steering and oversight for the initiative - leading the overall initiative, and setting and managing the scope of work, - ensuring the initiative is staffed appropriately with both internal and external resources - assisting with the development of organizational alternatives and implementation scenarios, and - serving as subject-matter expert across multiple areas. Further supporting the program design and structured finance elements of the initiative on an ad hoc basis is Dan Bryant, a Senior Management Consultant with THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) with over twenty-five years in structured finance, investment banking and financial services, has deployed structured finance solutions within complex ecosystems. - coordinating and facilitating related community engagement efforts, - developing current state and future state analysis deliverables, - performing major components of the work outlined for the initiative, and - providing additional subject-matter expertise on an as-needed basis. Further supporting the modeling elements of this initiative are Mary Herfurth and Dan Quinn, Senior Financial Analysts and Business Process Consultants from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG), with a strong background in community development, financial and process modeling, capital markets and structured finance, and financial institution regulatory compliance, and who will be responsible for the business analysis and financial analysis of the project team, including: - developing integrated financial models and other financial analysis deliverables, - performing major components of the work outlined for the initiative, and - providing additional subject-matter expertise on an as-needed basis. The above are the core project roles provided by the team from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG). The scope and actual workload will naturally be dependent on availability of the requisite teams within the CITY OF EDINA. Additionally, it is noted that there is a proposed interim milestone with the completion of the planning phase that would determine resource requirements for the remainder of the first phase based on resources available with the CITY OF EDINA and opportunities to supplement the project team. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 6 OF 20 The project team from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) will coordinate all activities related to planning, designing and execution of this phase, coordinating with the CITY OF EDINA management teams and other stakeholders as appropriate. The full project team will consist of several cross-functional teams with representation and key contributors from each of the CITY OF EDINA support areas / departments. Additionally, some of these areas may manage detailed activities required specifically for their tasks and milestones in coordination with the overall initiative. For this, the project team from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) may also work with various legal, tax and regulatory advisors as required. Any related third-party budget estimates will be developed as the initiative progresses. To the extent additional subject matter expertise is required as a “deep dive” on an ad hoc basis, the project team from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) will coordinate with extended team members specializing in these areas. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 7 OF 20 ESTIMATED TIMELINE AND EFFORT The proposed approach for this initiative is outlined as follows, and many activities are intended to run concurrently. Estimated durations are included for planning purposes. For Phase I, it is assumed that the project will start in Q1 2023. MILESTONE (1) :: Project aligned with City objectives and scoped MILESTONE (2) :: Execution alternatives framed and selected MILESTONE (3) :: Implementation plan drafted Additional detail on these efforts is outlined below, and which leverages the framework utilized in the successful establishment and operation of affordable housing funding programs nationally and locally (an excerpt of this framework is included in the appendix). Project Kickoff and Planning // The planning phase is designed to: i) finalize the goals, objectives, and scope of the initiative, ii) finalize the internal and external staffing of the project team, iii) develop the project plan and related project management documents, (iv) finalize the project budget, and establish the project steering, oversight and management process. These activities are envisioned to be accomplished through a combination of facilitated working sessions and offline preparation. Due to the nature of this initiative, it is assumed this will be an accelerated process and that assessment activities will begin during this phase as well. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include participation in a facilitated working session, and periodic reviews as the effort progresses. Part I. Baseline Assessment and Leveraging Community Practices // A preliminary baseline of the current single-family and multi-family affordable housing strategies and environment in the City of Edina will be performed and documented. Affordable Housing - Phase I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kickoff Part I - Baseline Assessment Baseline Current Strategies Stakeholder Reviews Benchmark Best Practices Part II - Execution Alternatives Develop Execution Alternatives Stakeholder Reviews Recommendations and Next Steps Part III - Implementation Roadmap Interim Drafting / Development Stakeholder Reviews Finalize Implementation Roadmap January February 1 2 3 PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 8 OF 20 Deliverable 1. Baseline Assessment. This assessment will benchmark against various community best practices based upon the goals and objectives established in the planning phase, confirming potential limiting factors of currently deployed funding strategies. The baseline assessment will be created to develop alternative strategies for best practices in single- family and multi-family affordable housing programs and strategies and ultimately to an implementation roadmap. Additionally, it leverages experience with communities across the country in addressing systemic challenges to affordable housing including: i) accessing access to capital, including leading various local and national community lending and capital structuring efforts, ii) identifying the potential impact of non- profit community development organizations and financial intermediaries for affordable housing providers, and iii) evaluating financial institutions, that serve cities and local government as well as philanthropic foundations, that work with public and private organizations that invest in impact areas. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include participation in targeted and facilitated working sessions, including active input into the baseline assessment, and active input and review of the draft findings. Additional stakeholders may be identified for participation in these as appropriate, based on the nature of the programs currently in place. Deliverable 2. Leveraging Community Practices. As referenced above, framing the baseline assessment against various best practices and recent innovative solutions in single-family and multi- family affordable housing programs and strategies is an important component to creating an executable implementation roadmap. This includes representation or engagement of initiatives such as: (i) innovative and nationally recognized affordable housing programs from leading organizations locally (e.g. Bremer Bank, Aeon, Sunrise Banks, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, City of Lakes Community Land Trust / Homes Within Reach, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, etc.), and (ii) leading organizations from other regions and including national intermediaries (e.g. Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership (ANDP), Housing Partnership Network (HPN), Homewise, Community Reinvestment Fund, LISC, Community Housing Capital (CHC), NeighborWorks America, BlueHub Capital, Capital Impact Partners, LIFF, Mercy Housing, etc.) and others in the non-profit arena, with (iii) additional representative mission-aligned private developers. Together, these provide an invaluable foundation of learning to establish a baseline assessment of the current state, better understand the challenges and opportunities involved, and ultimately create the highest likelihood of programmatic success. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 9 OF 20 City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include a facilitated working session including active input and review of a draft list of organizations / programs for engagement, optional participation in any select discussions with targeted organizations / programs, a facilitated working session active input and review of highlighted efforts for alignment with City of Edina objectives and potential leverage. Part II. Execution Alternatives // Alternative execution strategies will be created and documented that benchmark desired outcomes against the current baseline (leaving as-is). Deliverable 3. Execution Alternatives. Each alternative will define and plan for different scenarios that again leverage best practices for community-based affordable housing initiatives. The execution alternatives will examine an extensive set of merits and considerations that includes programmatic objectives (e.g. access, racial equity, etc.), risk and cost considerations, community goodwill, access to capital, infrastructure and tax attributes as well as many other factors. Community best practices as well as critical learnings and risks of different approaches will be documented in each of the alternatives and including quadrant analysis. Decision-making criteria will be developed across key stakeholders to help define optimal execution strategies for further assessment, refinement, and implementation aligned to affordable housing desired outcomes. Decision makers will have a detailed set of considerations, including practical learnings from other initiatives, to aid in assessing which of the various alternatives best aligns with the goals and objectives of the City of Edina. Each alternative will document scope and critical dependencies on execution as any approach to impact affordable housing in a community involves complex and interrelated public and private stakeholders that often struggle to find near and long-term alignment. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include a facilitated working session including active input and review of a preliminary draft of execution alternatives, co-development of the decision-making framework, and a facilitated working session including active input and review of final recommended execution alternatives for alignment with City of Edina objectives. Part III. Implementation Roadmap // A series of planning assumptions integrated with preliminary pro- forma will be developed across these alternatives and provide core input to an implementation roadmap. Deliverable 4. Implementation Roadmap. The implementation roadmap will provide the blueprint to execute upon the goals and objectives set forth in the planning phase. This includes key planning assumptions, key decisions, ideal stakeholders, steps required to create and optimally manage the funding programs. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 10 OF 20 As discussed in the execution alternatives, to be successful, affordable housing programs must deeply understand the role that city plays in relation to the other key public and private stakeholders and have a set of strategies to adapt and adjust to attain and maintain alignment to shared affordable housing objectives. A critical component is understanding the complexities of capital flows and how to structure public and private investment criteria into an action plan with specific goals and milestones that tie interdependent stakeholders to the same outcomes. City of Edina staff and sponsor engagement is anticipated to include a facilitated working session including active input and review of a preliminary draft of execution alternatives, co-development of the decision-making framework, and a facilitated working session including active input and review of final recommended execution alternatives for alignment with City of Edina objectives. Additional support may be provided in future phases based on the implementation strategy or strategies selected, which may include supporting the group through a business change management effort or providing additional support around the development of policies and procedures, organizational and governance matters, systems and controls, or platforms and reporting. Estimates for these additional efforts will be prepared as the effort progresses. For context as part of the broader business change management framework utilized by the teams, the current efforts under Phase I would be largely captured with “Analysis” in the summary as follows. Detailed scope documents will be developed as required for each of these areas during the planning and implementation modeling phase of this initiative. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 11 OF 20 SOLUTIONS PRICING AND AVAILABILITY This expected launch of the initiative will be [January 2023]. All resources identified in the project team from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP are available to start as soon as required. For Phase I, estimated costs for this initiative will be refined, if necessary, during the initial planning phase, depending on findings and feedback from the stakeholder and revised throughout the lifecycle of the project. The initial projection for Milestone 1 and Milestone 2, completing the baseline analysis and developing execution alternatives is estimated between $20,000 and $30,000, and is largely dependent on the complexity of underlying requirements and stakeholder guidance, and depth of analysis suitable to develop the recommendations. The initial projection for Milestone 3, which will develop the implementation roadmap based on the strategy path(s) determined, is estimated at around $5,000, and which will be revised based on findings and stakeholder direction. Together, the initial projection for Phase I across these milestones, is estimated at between $25,000 and $35,000. These initial estimates are comparable to similar projects undertaken by the teams from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP. These initial projections factor in using the project team from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP as outlined below. Daily rates assume an eight-hour day and are billable in ¼ hour increments, and do not include travel or other related business expenses. Note for Phase I, several in-person working sessions would ordinarily be envisioned, and which can be estimated separately, noting as a practical matter these are not currently anticipated at the same level due to social distancing practices in place and instead will leverage virtual working sessions. This fee schedule is further inclusive of a non-profit / public client discount of approximately 20%-25% plus per resource. ROLE RESOURCE EST. UTILIZATION DAILY RATE ADJUSTED RATE ENGAGEMENT LEAD DONOVAN WALSH ½ -1 DAY / WEEK $ 2,360 / DAY $ 2,000 / DAY MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT DAN BRYANT ½ -2½ DAYS / WEEK $1,760 / DAY $1,480 / DAY SR. BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSTS MARY HERFURTH (AD HOC) $1,560 / DAY $1,120 / DAY DAN QUINN $1,000 / DAY $ 720 / DAY Additional support may be provided in future phases based on the implementation strategy or strategies selected. Estimates for these additional efforts will be prepared as the effort progresses. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 12 OF 20 NEXT STEPS Assuming approval of the project, a kickoff working session will serve to launch the initiative and begin the initial phase. Additional stakeholders from the CITY OF EDINA and working team members from across the organization will be identified during the project inception. We look forward to supporting the CITY OF EDINA on this important initiative. Very truly yours, Donovan Walsh THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 13 OF 20 APPENDIX. ABOUT THE FIRM AND REPRESENTATIVE ENGAGEMENTS Donovan Walsh (THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP) – Founded the firm in 2005 and is currently serving as both its President and as an executive management consultant to clients. Recent engagements include leading a series of post-acquisition integrations for various clients domestically and internationally, managing the global reorganization for a multinational corporation, managing the regulatory approval and launch of a number of European banks for leading financial institutions, leading various organizational alignment efforts, managing several de novo business launches and international expansion efforts, and launching a national non-profit assisting hundreds of communities across the nation with their foreclosure- related neighborhood stabilization efforts through the establishment of a consortium of the leading financial institutions. Prior experience includes various executive and management roles in the financial services industry, including managing domestic and international integration efforts, launching new business lines and non-profit organizations, and managing the international expansion for the financial services division of a large (Fortune 5) company. Representative engagements across community lending and investment include: - Managing the launch of an innovative capital solution for affordable housing equity purposed for supporting the preservation of at-risk naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH), through a wholly owned special purpose Community Development Corporation (CDC) subsidiary of a national bank and Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI). Efforts included leading the working group internally within the bank and across non-profit and public community partners, establishing funding solutions to address the equity capital needs at the property level, incorporating both impact capital (leveraged as bank regulatory capital) and guaranty support through philanthropic participants, and structuring the program to meet bank internal requirements and regulatory requirements, the needs of the participants, and overall goals of the program. This program was designed and established as a national model, to be leveraged by other financial institutions across affordable housing, small business, and other areas of community lending and investment. References: David Reiling, Chief Executive Officer, Sunrise Banks Alan Arthur, Chief Executive Officer, Aeon R.T. Rybak, President and CEO, The Minneapolis Foundation Eric Jolly, President and CEO, St. Paul and Minnesota Foundation James Frey, President and CEO, Frey Foundation of Minnesota Barry Wides, Deputy Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) - Managing the launch of an affordable housing equi ty fund purposed for supporting the preservation of at-risk naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH). Efforts included leading the working group of local non-profit and public community partners, establishing capital solutions to address the equity needs required at the property level, raising capital through public, philanthropic and socially- responsible private participants, and structuring the fund to meet the needs of the participants and goals of the program. This is the first of two planned local funds (of $32mm each), and pilot for expansion to a national program. References: Warren Hanson, Chief Executive Officer, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 14 OF 20 Mary Tingerthal, Commissioner (ret.), Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Elizabeth McGeveran, Director of Investments, McKnight Foundation Mitch Bleske, Chief Financial Officer, Bremer Bank Michael Morrell, Senior Vice President, Sunrise Banks - Supporting the launch of an impact investment mutual fund for retail and institutional impact investors, structured as a co-investment interval fund for a leading portfolio lender to church and community facilities. Efforts included leading operational readiness efforts for loan origination and servicing including policy and procedures design and development, supporting the design and development of the risk management and governance framework, supporting the development of the offering materials and disclosures, and leading the impact investment market activities (including both in-house distribution and external). This is the first of various planned impact investment themed mutual funds. References: (available upon request) - Validation and design of a national guarantee facility to support access to capital for housing, small business and environmental efforts with The Kresge Foundation. The teams from The Financial Services Consulting Group (TFSCG) and organized a collaboration of philanthropic foundations, community development organizations and financial institutions to validate the need for and design the Community Investment Guarantee Facility (CIGF). The program supports community development organizations in accessing capital (either where they would be unable to but for the guarantee support, or on more favorable terms due to the guarantee support). Additionally, the program supports this new and innovative method of leveraging the philanthropic community for increased impact. References: Aaron Seybert, Managing Director of Social Investments, The Kresge Foundation Kimberlee Cornett, Director of Impact Investments, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Barry Wides, Deputy Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) (various foundation, community and financial services stakeholders also available) - Design and launch of fund to provide access to capital for underserved communities with the Detroit Home Mortgage program. The teams from THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) and Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) organized a collaboration among regional banks securing $150mm in capital to originate first mortgages based on a home’s appraised value and second mortgages to cover costs above appraised value (e.g. for renovation, appraisal gap, etc.). The program enables homeowners to invest in home improvements and raise property values while protecting them from economic losses due to hardship events. The effort brought together the lending expertise and capital of banks, the education capabilities of homebuyer counseling, the social investment of a major foundation, and support from the state housing finance agency and federal government. References: Rip Rapson, President, Kresge Foundation Gary Torgow, Chairman, TCF Bank Steve Steinour, Chairman, President and CEO, Huntington Bank Sandro DiNello, President and CEO, Flagstar Bank Barry Wides, Deputy Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Frank Altman, Chief Executive Officer, Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF USA) PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 15 OF 20 - Managing the launch of a recovery loan fund purposed for complementing neighborhood stabilization activities by increasing home ownership in distressed neighborhoods. Efforts included leading the working group of local non-profit and public community partners, establishing scalable underwriting and servicing operations, raising capital through public, philanthropic and socially-responsible private participants, and structuring the fund to meet the needs of the participants and goals of the program. This was the first of several planned local funds, and the first pilot for expansion to a national program with NeighborWorks America and a companion program with the Housing Partnership Network, and which also includes Michigan, South Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin. References: Mary Tingerthal, Commissioner (ret.), Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Tom Fulton, Executive Director (ret.), Family Housing Fund Chuck Wehrwein, Chief Operating Officer (fmr.), NeighborWorks® America Becky Regan, President of Capital Markets Companies, Housing Partnership Network - Leading a program development effort for distressed mortgage purchases purposed for both complimenting neighborhood stabilization activities, and as a means of preserving existing homeowners and tenants through re-underwriting. Efforts included: program development, analysis and design, coordinating with various other local non-profit and public community partners, pilot preparations, and planning for the rollout of the program at a national level. References: (available upon request) - Leading the development and launch of the National Community Stabilization Trust purposed for supporting neighborhood stabilization activities. Efforts included working with Enterprise, LISC, NeighborWorks America, The Housing Partnership Network and other leading national non-profit housing intermediaries and local collaboratives to develop and launch the national non-profit intermediary. This effort also included leading the creation of an industry-wide consortium of financial institutions, government and non-profit providers locally and nationally, focused on stabilizing at-risk communities and preserving affordable housing in hundreds of communities across the nation. References: Craig Nickerson, Executive Director (ret.), National Community Stabilization Trust Tom Bledsoe, Chief Executive Officer, The Housing Partnership Network Eileen Fitzgerald, former Chief Executive Officer (fmr.), NeighborWorks® America Barry Wides, Deputy Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 16 OF 20 APPENDIX: SOLUTIONS APPROACH DETAIL Funding sources and programs, using various debt and equity structures, will be incorporated in overall funding solutions, and may include: - partnerships with a portfolio lender on an indirect or referral basis - product customization and risk-sharing with a portfolio lender on a brokered / correspondent basis - product customization and risk-sharing with secondary markets on a brokered / correspondent basis - product customization and risk-sharing with a portfolio lender(s) and participant(s) on a pool basis A summary of the overall framework that will be used with this City of Edina Affordable Housing Strategies effort has been included as follows, and as applicable for single-family and multifamily affordable housing objectives. This framework will be used for determining what solutions may be best suited to support this effort, and consists of: (1) framing the approach, (2) optimizing the solutions, and then ultimately (3) executing on these solutions. FRAMING THE APPROACH The first step in this process is framing the approach. This includes understanding “what” is being targeted to be solved for (e.g. interim recovery financing vs. permanent financing, borrower / tenant affordability, neighborhood stabilization, program sustainability, scale of impact, etc.) and subsequently the various impacts these will have on the financing products (e.g. rate, term, eligibility criteria, etc.). Additionally, it includes assessing the various alternative solutions options that may be considered to meet these needs, including: product customization with portfolio lenders (a referral, broker, or correspondent lending basis), establishing a risk-sharing structure with the portfolio lenders, establishing a fund, hybrid structures, or other alternatives. There are many models that can be leveraged, adapted or developed to meet these needs – and each bring with them different benefits, costs and implications to be considered. Having not only an understanding of the current capacity of the community development organization(s) and key local and national partners, but understanding the future capacity that would be required for these various alternatives is important for the assessment of the “gap”. Options for how to close this gap (e.g. build, partner, outsource, etc.) can be incorporated against each of alternative solutions options. In addition to the practical aspects of capacity, it is also important to consider the perceived credibility the participants may hold. Further, it is also critical to identify the stakeholders in the future program, including the sponsor, borrowers PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 17 OF 20 / tenants and their community, the community development organization and their collaborative, and the various types of participants in the future program as it is important to assess the various options from each of these perspectives individually and collectively. The last key step in framing the approach involves identifying the high-likelihood and potential participants for the various types of capital that will be needed for the program, including both (1) the “senior” funds that will likely comprise the majority required, and (2) the at-risk “subordinated” funds, and credit enhancement providers that will likely be required to secure the senior funds. KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN STRUCTURING SOLUTIONS As a part of optimizing the approach, various structures will be considered and assessed to determine what is most appropriate, including: - Partnerships on an indirect or referral basis with a lender - Partnerships on a brokered or correspondent lending basis with a lender(s) - Product customization and risk-sharing on a correspondent lending basis with a lender(s) - Product customization and risk-sharing on a mini-pool basis with a lender(s) - Product customization and risk-sharing in a pool with multiple participants Key considerations in structuring include: - ensuring the fundamental economics are understood, modeled and explicitly tied to the underlying assets (see next section: Key Considerations with the Underlying Assets) - including production volume projections over time and by asset type, and any supporting components as appropriate (e.g. warehouse line, etc.) - assessing various credit enhancement options, including: cash, loan loss reserve, loan loss guaranty, spread-funded reserve, etc. - assessing various cashflows and structures, including simple participations, tranched structures and waterfalls (principal and/or interest), etc. - assessing servicing considerations (released / retained), alignment with risk sharing, and impact to performance considerations - including necessary third-party expenses (e.g. loan servicing, loan counseling, fund administration, deal distribution, investor reporting, tax, etc.) and indirect revenues and value (e.g. interest income on reserves, balances and float, etc.) and indirect costs (e.g. unfilled commitments, etc.) - understanding and factoring in the resulting impacts to risk, maturity, expected and actual rates of return (and on a cash basis, adjusted risk-adjusted capital basis, etc.) - establishing a conservative base case and stress testing these against various performance scenarios (financial performance and program impact) Lastly, optimization of the structure from the perspectives of stakeholders in the future program (e.g. homeowner, neighborhood, community development organization and collaborative, and the various participants) is important. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 18 OF 20 KEY CONSIDERATIONS WITH THE UNDERLYING ASSETS As another key part of optimizing the approach, various types of underlying assets will be considered and assessed to determine what is most appropriate, including: - not only the loans to the borrowers (homeowners in single-family, owner / operators in multifamily), but also - the expected performance characteristics of these loans (including borrower considerations in single-family, and underlying tenant considerations in multifamily), - the underlying properties serving as collateral for these loans, and - expected net recoveries in the event of default. Key considerations with the underlying assets include: - ensuring the fundamental economics are understood, modeled and explicitly tied to the supporting funding structure (see previous section: Key Considerations in Structuring Solutions) - determine lending terms, including: interest rate (risk adjusted / subsidized), maturity, purpose (purchase, purchase / rehab, situational refinance, etc.) - determine the lending / investment instrument used (mortgage / contract for deed, community land trust, equity / shared equity, etc.) - explicit incorporation of responsible practices – “classic” loan underwriting, pre-purchase counseling , post-purchase counseling, loan modifications, tenant support, etc. - explicit inclusion of community perspective as required in either the loan origination or loan servicing practices - understanding expected performance – conservatively, including: delinquencies, defaults, pre- payments, structured recoveries, modifications, etc. - understanding expected loan loss severity – conservatively, including recovery time, costs, and net realizable value of asset - establishing a conservative base case, and stress testing this against various performance scenarios (financial performance and program impact) Lastly, assessing the underlying assets from the perspectives of stakeholders in the future program (e.g. homeowner, neighborhood, community development organization and collaborative, and the various participants) is important. RISK, COMPLIANCE, LEGAL, REGULATORY, ACCOUNTING AND TAX CONSIDERATIONS As the final part of optimizing the approach, various types of additional program design elements will need to be considered and assessed to determine what is most appropriate, including: - risk assessment and ownership (credit performance, operational, etc.), - compliance with applicable regulations, laws and industry “best practices”, - legal entities and relationships between the parties, and - tax and accounting considerations. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 19 OF 20 Key considerations with the program design include: - assessing the roles and structures of entities, including consideration for project LLC’s – partial and true bankruptcy remoteness, etc. - ensuring the team can identify and assess new requirements that may be introduced, including: broker / dealer considerations, securities considerations, investor reporting, etc. - assessing various tax and accounting implications considerations including: UBIT/tax-exempt status impact, TMP / REMIC, non-qualifying publicly traded partnership, GAAP loan accounting, etc. - understanding the types of risk (credit performance, operational, etc.) and ownership of these by the different roles, participants and entities, - agreements between the parties (e.g. loan sale agreement, pooling and participation agreement, loan servicing or sub-servicing agreement, etc.) - ensuring systemic compliance with applicable regulations, laws and industry “best practices” (Fair Lending, TRID / RESPA - TILA, Reg. Z, etc.) – through both quality assurance and quality control Lastly, assessing these various types of additional program design elements from the perspectives of stakeholders in the future program (e.g. homeowner, neighborhood, community development organization and collaborative, and the various participants) is important. EXECUTING THE PROGRAM The final step in the process is execution – and generally consists of the following key sets of activities prior to the launch: - engaging participants for participation in the program, - refining and adapting the program from negotiations / collaborations, and - program launch preparations with the local collaborative and participants. Key considerations prior to the launch include: - engaging the participants from each of their respective perspectives (e.g. for bank participants, consider including loan accounting methods and returns based on cash and regulatory capital, impact on CRA, etc.) - understanding the specific drivers for the various participants (e.g. distinguishing “no” from “not this way, but maybe another way”) - refining and adapting the various program elements based on feedback, and being mindful of the interdependencies - finalizing agreements between the parties (e.g. loan sale agreement, pooling and participation agreement, etc.) - preparations for the various operational element required for loan production and servicing as appropriate, including: sourcing / channels, loan origination (loan officer, processor, underwriter, funder, post-closing, etc.), loan servicing, default management, asset disposition, pre-purchase / post-purchase counseling, program marketing, etc. PROPOSED PROJECT APPROACH AND STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF EDINA // AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGIES - ASSESSMENT & ROADMAP (PHASE I) UPDATED: 10 NOVEMBER 2022 CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 20 OF 20 - preparations for the various operational element required for program management as appropriate, including: participant reporting and relationship management, secondary marketing (pricing, locking, hedging, selling), fund administration, deal closing and funding, deal distribution / participant payments, document custodian, etc. As a part of and after the launch, additional activities generally include, - the commitment of debt and equity (e.g. NMTC, etc.) funding and closing on the program, - the origination and servicing of the loans, - the refinement of origination guideline and/or servicing practices based on agreed changes to the program (e.g. due to performance, market, etc.) - the start, ongoing operation and eventual conclusion of the program, and - participant reporting and relationship management. Affordable Housing Strategies December Update Affordable Housing Strategies •Develop a creative sustainable funding model that would allow the City to accelerate the achievement of its affordable housing goals. •Baseline. Build on the solid foundation undertaken by the city •Engage. Additional representative programs within the region and nationally to share various programmatic best practices •Benchmark. Assess these best practices / innovative solutions •Alternatives.Develop additional strategies for addressing “gaps” (including high-level implementation roadmaps, risk management) •Supported by: THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP EdinaMN.gov 2 About the Firm •THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSULTING GROUP (TFSCG) is a management consulting firm specializing in managing business and market transitions. We have both an industry-leading financial services practice focused on providing solutions to the nation's leading financial institutions, and a nationally recognized practice in the areas of community development, small business lending, and affordable housing. •In addition to having an extensive background in banking, capital markets, and product development, in related efforts, our teams have been assisting communities across the country in successfully addressing challenges in accessing capital, including leading various local and national community lending and capital structuring efforts, for non- profit community development organizations and financial intermediaries, for affordable housing providers, for financial institutions, cities and local governments, philanthropic foundations, and within private and institutional impact investing areas. •EXPERTS IN FINANCIAL SERVICES WITH A PASSION FOR SUPPORTING OUR COMMUNITIES EdinaMN.gov 3 Approach and Target Timing EdinaMN.gov 4 Affordable Housing - Phase I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kickoff Part I - Baseline Assessment Baseline Current Strategies Stakeholder Reviews Benchmark Best Practices Part II - Execution Alternatives Develop Execution Alternatives Stakeholder Reviews Recommendations and Next Steps Part III - Implementation Roadmap Interim Drafting / Development Stakeholder Reviews Finalize Implementation Roadmap January February Example engagement includes: (i) the affordable housing preservation program with Bremer Bank and others, (ii) engagement of leading organizations locally (e.g. Aeon, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, City of Lakes Community Land Trust / Homes Within Reach, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, etc.) (iii) engagement from other regions and including national intermediaries (e.g. Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership (ANDP), Housing Partnership Network (HPN), Homewise, Community Reinvestment Fund, LISC, Community Housing Capital (CHC), NeighborWorks America, BlueHub Capital, Capital Impact Partners, LIIF, Mercy Housing, etc.) and others in the non-profit arena, (iv) additional representative mission- aligned private developers. Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: C hange O rder #1 Eden Avenue Landsc aping Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R equest for P urchase: C hange Order #1 E den Avenue Landscaping with P eterson Companies to change the substantial completion date to June 1, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he project was delayed due to C R R ail permitting and private utility issues. T his change order will extend the contract date so the contractor can finish the work without any delay penalties. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order #1 Eden Avenue Lands caping CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 Contract No: ENG 21-6 Contract Date: May 27, 2021 Type of Work: Landscaping Location: Eden Ave and Brookside Ave Contractor: Peterson Companies, Inc. Address: 8326 Wyoming Trail, Chisago City, MN 55013 Description of Change: Adjustment of Substantial Completion Date ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL 1 7.5 months substantial contract completion date extension to June 1, 2023 $0.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1 $0.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACT AMOUNT SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.00, AND EXTENSION OF 0.0 MONTHS SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THERE IS A CHANGE TO THE SUBSTANIAL COMPLETION DATE TO A June 1, 2023 SUBSTANIAL COMPLETION DATE FROM OCTOBER 14, 2022 SUBSTANIAL COMPLETION DATE. Amount of Original Contract Total Additions Total Deductions Amount of Adjusted Contract $93,624.30 $0.00 $0.00 $93,624.30 ITEM #1: Substantial Completion Contract Extension. The extension is warranted because the project team worked with CP Rail prior to the creation of this contract to secure the appropriate permits to work next to the railroad tracks. Permits have now been secured but it has impacted the contract completion date. Approved Contractor: City of Edina: By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2021\ENG 21-6 (21004) Eden & Brookside Improvements\21004 Grandview TIF Improvements\ADMIN\LEGAL\Contracts\Landscaping\Eden Ave Landscaping_Change Order_1 Contract Date.doc Project Manager 12/2/2022 Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: C hange O rder #1 Eden Avenue Improvements Ac tion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve R equest for P urchase: C hange Order #1 E den Avenue I mprovements with S .M . H entges and S ons to extend the contract completion date to July 28, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he project was delayed due to C R R ail permitting and private utility issues. T his change order will extend the contract date so the contractor can finish the work without any delay penalties. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order #1 Eden Avenue Improvements CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 Contract No: ENG 21-6 Contract Date: May 27, 2021 Type of Work: Street and Utility Improvements Location: Eden Ave and Brookside Ave Contractor: S.M. Hentges and Sons Address: 650 Quaker Avenue, Jordan, MN 55352 Description of Change: Adjustment of Completion Date ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL 1 6-week contract completion date extension to July 28, 2023 $0.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1 $0.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACT AMOUNT SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.00, AND EXTENSION OF 6 WEEKS SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THERE IS A CHANGE TO A July 28, 2023 COMPLETION DATE FROM June 16, 2023. Amount of Original Contract Total Additions Total Deductions Amount of Adjusted Contract $4,193,498.55 $0.00 $0.00 $4,193,498.55 ITEM #1: Contract Extension. The extension is warranted because the project team worked with CP Rail prior to the creation of this contract to secure the appropriate permits to work next to the railroad tracks. Permits have now been secured but it has impacted the contract completion date. Approved Contractor: City of Edina: By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2021\ENG 21-6 (21004) Eden & Brookside Improvements\21004 Grandview TIF Improvements\ADMIN\LEGAL\Contracts\Eden Avenue_Change Order_1 Contract Date.doc Thomas A. Soucek Digitally signed by Thomas A. Soucek DN: C=US, E=tom.soucek@smhentges.com, O="SM Hentges & Sons, Inc", CN=Thomas A. Soucek Date: 2022.12.02 12:19:32-06'00' Project Manager December 2, 2022 Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: C hange O rder #1 G randview P edes trian Bridge Ac tion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve R equest for P urchase: C hange Order #1 G randview P edestrian Bridge with P ember C ompanies to extend the contract completion date to July 28, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he project was delayed due to C R R ail permitting and private utility issues. T his change order will extend the contract date so the contractor can finish the work. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order #1 Grandview Pedes trian Bridge CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 Contract No: ENG 21-6 Contract Date: June 24, 2021 Type of Work: Grandview Pedestrian Bridge Location: Grandview Parking Ramp / 5146 Eden Ave Contractor: Pember Companies Address: N4449 469th Street, Menomonie, WI 54751 Description of Change: Adjustment of Completion Date ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL 1 7-month contract completion date extension to July 28, 2023 $0.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1 $0.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACT AMOUNT SHALL BE ADJUSTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.00, AND EXTENSION OF 7 months SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THERE IS A CHANGE TO A July 28, 2023 COMPLETION DATE FROM November 20, 2022. Amount of Original Contract Total Additions Total Deductions Amount of Adjusted Contract $1,947,168.90 $0.00 $0.00 $1,947,168.90 ITEM #1: Contract Extension. The extension is warranted because the project team worked with CP Rail prior to the creation of this contract to secure the appropriate permits to work next to the railroad tracks. Permits have now been secured but it has impacted the contract completion date. Approved Contractor: City of Edina: By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2021\ENG 21-6 (21004) Eden & Brookside Improvements\21004 Grandview TIF Improvements\ADMIN\LEGAL\Contracts\Grandview Ped Bridge_Change Order_1 Contract Date.doc Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: F rom:S tephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approval of R edevelopment Agreement for Multifamily Hous ing at 4620 West 77th S treet Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approval of R edevelopment Agreement I N TR O D U C TI O N: T his item pertains to the use of public financing to partially fund private redevelopment at 4620 West 77th Street. S pecial counsel at Dorsey and W hitney have prepared a complete R edevelopment Agreement based on the Term S heet that was presented to the E dina H R A on J uly 15, 2022. T he developer and representatives from D orsey & Whitney and Ehlers Associates will be available to answer any questions about this proposed Agreement. T his Agreement will also be presented to the C ity C ouncil for consideration on December 20, 2022. S taff recommends that this R edevelopment Agreement be approved. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Redevelopment Agreemenet Sustainabile Building Policy Checklis t Values View Finder Memo December 8, 2022 Chair and Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Approval of Redevelopment Agreement for Multifamily Housing at 4620 W. 77th St. Information / Background: The Solhem Companies is proposing a 276-unit multi-family development located at 4620 W. 77th St. (the “Site”). To develop this new housing, the developers have identified a gap of up to $9,351,000. Financial assistance is being requested due to the extraordinary soil conditions caused by a high-water table, public access to the Fred Richards Park, the inclusion of affordable and “attainable” housing, and costs associated with recent passage of Sustainable Building Policy. The amount of debt that can be leveraged is limited as this is not intended to be a luxury building, but rather 100% of the units are planned to be affordable to the general workforce: ten percent (10%) of units (28 units) will be affordable to households with incomes at or below 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI), and an additional 40% of the units (110 units) will have rents restricted not to exceed 120% of AMI. The remaining 50% of the units are intended to have rents not to exceed 120% of AMI but could increase in response to increasing expenditures. Initially, 100% of the anticipated rents will be below 120% of AMI with the vast majority affordable to households with incomes at or below 100% of AMI ($93,900 for a household of 2) and over half with rents affordable to households with incomes less than 80% of AMI ($75,120 for a household of 2). The Site is within the Greater Southdale Area and has excellent proximity to schools, parks, trails, transit, access to employment, and to goods and services. Currently the Site is occupied by a 3-story office building and associated cracked asphalt surface parking lot. The Site is underdeveloped given the proximity of superior amenities. The City Council approved the final rezoning, final development plan, and site improvement plan for the proposed project on October 6th, 2022. Together with legal and financial advisors from Ehlers Associates and Dorsey & Whitney, staff has met with the developer to scrutinize the financial pro forma and prepare terms and conditions by which Pentagon Park TIF Pooled funds and SPaRC funds could be used to support the redevelopment of this Site. While these advisors work for the City/HRA, the cost of this work has been borne by the developers. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Ehlers has reviewed the financial pro forma for proposed development and determined that the financial gap is approximately $9.35 million. Ehlers also confirmed the “but for” test was met as required to use the TIF pooled funds. Dorsey has prepared a Redevelopment Agreement that abides by applicable Minnesota Statutes that govern Tax Increment Financing pooled funds and the use of SPaRC funds. The required qualifying costs also follow the spirit of Edina’s TIF policy and practice which is typically more limited than allowed by Minnesota Statute. This includes that the TIF Note for the pooled funds that will not exceed 10% of the actual documented costs of the improvements. The negotiation of this Redevelopment Agreement contains some flexibility to allow for uncertainty in the financial marketplace that could occur between the time of financial closing and construction completion. Like other recently reviewed developments, this development faces many challenges:  The construction industry is hindered by ongoing supply chain issues and fluctuations in commodity and material prices.  The continued labor shortage also tends to drive up costs and extend schedules.  Increasing interest rates limit the principle that can be borrowed and create additional developer risk. To allow for some flexibility the pay-go TIF note for the pooled funds will be used to reduce the initial equity invested and combined with the net operating income allow for a 7% cash on cost return. The limiting factor is the aggregate Note payments will not exceed $7,351,000. This return is .07% higher than a deal that closed a year ago, in part to account for increased interest rates and a higher percentage of units that have restricted rents. City staff supports this new investment as it will provide critical connection to Fred Richards Park by way of a road for vehicular traffic and a plaza designed for pedestrians. It also provides new residential units, 10% of which will be affordable to households with income at or below 50% of AMI, and additional 110 units with rents restricted to below market rate, with all units initially having rents lower than what is seen in other new multifamily developments. The proposed development also aligns with the intersection of City values, particularly race and equity, sustainability, community engagement and health. The Redevelopment Agreement follows the general format and strategic approach typically used by Edina for redevelopment projects focused on market rate housing with an affordability component together with wide variety of public benefits. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Sources and Uses Sources Uses Debt Financing $ 65,400,000 77% Acquisition $ 5,186,000 $18,790 per door Equity $ 10,210,186 12% Hard Costs $ 63,703,318 TIF Supported Equity $ 7,310,000 9% "Green" Elements $ 905,000 1.10% TDC SPaRC Loan $ 2,000,000 2% Soft Costs $ 5,638,097 TOTAL $ 84,920,186 City Fees $ 2,937,030 Developer Fee $ 3,100,166 3.80% TDC Financing Fees $ 3,450,575 TOTAL $ 84,920,186 $307,682 per unit Sources The Developer is seeking approximately $9.35 million in gap financing. Together with Ehlers, staff has identified two sources to fill this gap: $7.35 million in pooled TIF funds from the Pentagon Park Redevelopment TIF district and $2 million in SPARC funds. No new TIF District is being created for this development. Rather the Pentagon Park TIF District was approved in February 2014 to incentivize multi-phase development in the area, including multifamily residential apartments. A large portion of the pooled increment is being generated by the Fred I and this development itself. The funds would be provided as a pay-go Note to reimburse defined elements of the development. The SPaRC funds are a pool of unobligated increment that through legislative action can be used to assist development. The use of these funds to support this development, specifically the connection to Fred Richards Park, complies with the SPaRC spending plan adopted November 16, 2021. The structure of the terms has most of the financial risk with the developer. Uses  Pentagon Park TIF Pooled Loan ($7.35 million): Pooled TIF will be used to reimburse the project for pre-determined eligible costs after this proposed development is successfully completed. The eligible costs include: o Stormwater systems o Sustainability features o Construction related to soil conditions o Site preparation The developer will provide up front financing. The Note will be structured as a “pay-go” note so payments will be made over time, after the increment is collected. A look-back provision is included to assure that the TIF pooled funds provided are what are necessary to complete the development. STAFF REPORT Page 4  COVID Related Special Legislation SPARC Funds ($2 million): This source will be allocated towards access to Fred Richards Park from West 77th Street. Payments will be made during the construction period as various components are completed. Staff will review the construction draws and approve if the obligations are met. The loan will be forgiven upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Public Benefits In addition to providing 28 units affordable to households with incomes at or below 50% of the Area Median Income and an additional 110 units that will be rent restricted to not exceed 120% of AMI, the proposed development aligns with multiple City approved plans, policies, and stated values. Approved Plans and Policies 1. 2040 Comprehensive Plan The proposed use as multi-family residential with a café is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The project would provide 28 units of affordable housing, meet the City’s sustainability policy, and provide significant upgrades to pedestrian, vehicular and bike connections to Fred Richards Park and the Regional Trail. For example, the proposed development aligns with the following Comprehensive Plan Goals, among others: a. Chapter 4, Goal 1: The design of the proposed development acknowledges the interrelationship between land use, transportation, and is housing in an area accessible to a range of transportation options including bicycle, pedestrian and mass transit. The proposed development also addresses climate change through higher density development that helps reduce vehicle emissions. b. Chapter 4, Goal 2: The proposed development broadens the range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. c. Chapter 6, Goal 3: The proposed development support the Fred Richards Park Master Plan. 2. Southdale Design Experience Guidelines The developer has received input via the City’s “sketch plan” review process. This was taken into consideration when the developer prepared a full proposal to rezone and redevelop the site. 3. New Multifamily Affordable Housing Policy The proposed development will provide 10% of the units (28 units) affordable to households with incomes at or below 50% of AMI. These units will be affordable for 20-years and secured by a Declaration of Restriction Covenants recorded against the site. The remaining units will serve households with incomes that are not currently served by new multifamily market rate developments. Of these, 40% of the units (110 units) will offer rents not to exceed the levels set for 120% AMI households for the term of the Note. 4. Sustainable Buildings Policy (“SBP”) STAFF REPORT Page 5 Solhem will pursue the National Green Building Standard at the Silver level, to comply with the SBP. This standard is specific to home construction, and in many aspects comparable to LEED silver. The project will follow the MN B3 guidelines for predicted greenhouse gas emissions, including a lifecycle analysis of materials emissions to inform emissions reduction during construction. The proposed development will follow SB2030 requirements to meet the energy efficiency requirements, which seeks to cost-effectively (12 year payback) construct buildings that are 80% more energy efficient than a standard building built in 2005 in Minnesota. The development will comply with EV charging requirements. Finally, it will comply with the B3 bird safe path articulated in the SBP. 5. TIF Policy Ehlers confirmed the “but for” test was met as required to use the TIF pooled funds. Additionally, Dorsey has prepared a Term Sheet and Redevelopment Agreement that abides by applicable Minnesota Statutes that govern Tax Increment Financing pooled funds and the use of SPARC funds. The proposed project helps accomplish the City’s goals as described in the Comprehensive Plan, Housing Strategy Task Force Report, and Climate Action Plan by stimulating desirable redevelopment of an aging building, providing affordable and attainable housing units, providing critical connections to Fred Richards Park, and resulting in a new building that complies with the Sustainable Building Policy. 6. Policy for the Use of Unobligated TIF Funds (SPaRC) Pursuant to the TIF Act, the purpose of these expenditures is to spur construction of commercial buildings and support infrastructure within the City’s commercial and industrial districts to stimulate private investment among other things. Using these funds to provide gap financing on a large commercial building that includes pedestrian and vehicular connections to Fred Richards Park aligns with this purpose. 7. Housing Strategy Task Force Implementation Plan The proposed project contributes to numerous goals and strategies in the Housing Strategy Task Force Implementation Plan, including the following:  Add 28 of the 992 affordable rental units and 138 of the 900 market rate rental housing units for general occupancy  Promote affordable and attainable housing for low- and moderate-income households  Encourage sustainable design and technology in new housing  Attract new residents by expanding housing options for low- and moderate-income households  Support the development and preservation of affordable housing throughout Edina where there is access to transit City Values The Development proposal was reviewed using the Value View Finder Tool to determine the process for awarding financing. Staff highlighted overlapping opportunities in the areas of Health in all Policies, Race and Equity, Community Engagement and Sustainability. Staff highlighted overlapping opportunities, including the following: STAFF REPORT Page 6  Affordable housing with access to green space;  A location that has access to green forms of transportation; and  Increased neighborhood activation. They also identified some tradeoffs:  Perceived privatization of the park although this is an improvement over the commercial offices that currently align the park; and  Increase number of park users without corresponding park maintenance fee being charged. A memo of the full description of the findings are attached. Execution Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) by and among City of Edina, Minnesota, Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, and 4620 LLC Dated as of December 20, 2022 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 Execution -i- Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Article I Recitals; Exhibits, Definitions ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Recitals ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Exhibits......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Definitions .................................................................................................................... 3 Article II Representations and Warranties .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City ................................................................. 7 2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Authority ........................................................ 8 2.3 Representations and Warranties of Developer ............................................................. 8 Article III Public Assistance....................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Pooled TIF Qualified Costs .......................................................................................... 9 3.2 TIF Note ..................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 TIF Assistance and Potential Adjustment .................................................................. 12 3.4 Assignment of Note .................................................................................................... 14 3.5 SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan .................................................................................... 16 3.6 Conditions Precedent to SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Closing ............................... 16 3.7 Action to Reduce Taxes ............................................................................................. 17 Article IV Requirements for Minimum Improvements ........................................................................ 17 4.1 Commencement and Completion of Minimum Improvements .................................. 17 4.2 Zoning and Land Use Approvals ................................................................................ 18 4.3 Building and Construction Permits ............................................................................ 18 4.4 Restrictions on Development ..................................................................................... 18 4.5 Submission and Approval of Evidence of Financing ................................................. 18 4.6 Affordable Housing and Workforce Housing ............................................................ 19 4.7 Public Easements ........................................................................................................ 20 4.8 Environmental Sustainability ..................................................................................... 21 4.9 Equity and Inclusion ................................................................................................... 21 4.10 Effect of Delay ........................................................................................................... 24 4.11 Additional Responsibilities of Developer .................................................................. 24 4.12 Certificate of Completion ........................................................................................... 24 4.13 Public Art ................................................................................................................... 25 Article V Encumbrance of the Project Area .......................................................................................... 25 5.1 Mortgage of the Minimum Improvements Area ........................................................ 25 5.2 Copy of Notice of Default to Mortgagee .................................................................... 25 5.3 Mortgagee’s Option to Cure Events of Default .......................................................... 25 5.4 Rights of a Foreclosing Mortgagee ............................................................................ 25 5.5 Events of Default Under Mortgage ............................................................................ 26 5.6 Subordination of Agreement ...................................................................................... 26 Execution -ii- Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Article VI Insurance and Indemnification .............................................................................................. 27 6.1 Insurance .................................................................................................................... 27 6.2 Indemnification .......................................................................................................... 28 Article VII Other Developer Covenants ................................................................................................. 28 7.1 Developer Reimbursement Obligations ..................................................................... 28 7.2 Maintenance and Operation of the Improvements ..................................................... 28 7.3 Cooperation with Litigation ....................................................................................... 29 7.4 Condemnation, Damage, or Destruction .................................................................... 29 7.5 Business Subsidy Agreement ..................................................................................... 29 7.6 Developer/Authority Grant Applications ................................................................... 29 7.7 Mitigation of Construction Disruption ....................................................................... 29 7.8 Project Information..................................................................................................... 30 7.9 Project Naming ........................................................................................................... 30 Article VIII Transfer Limitations ........................................................................................................... 30 8.1 Representation as to the Minimum Improvements ..................................................... 30 8.2 Limitation on Transfers .............................................................................................. 30 Article IX Events of Default and Remedies ............................................................................................ 32 9.1 Events of Default Defined .......................................................................................... 32 9.2 Developer Events of Default ...................................................................................... 32 9.3 City and Authority Events of Default ......................................................................... 32 9.4 Cure Rights ................................................................................................................. 32 9.5 Authority Remedies on Developer Events of Default ................................................ 33 9.6 City Remedies on Developer Events of Default ......................................................... 33 9.7 Developer Remedies on City or Authority Events of Default .................................... 33 9.8 No Remedy Exclusive ................................................................................................ 33 9.9 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver ......................................................... 34 9.10 Reimbursement of Attorneys’ Fees ............................................................................ 34 Article X Additional Provisions ............................................................................................................... 34 10.1 Conflicts of Interest .................................................................................................... 34 10.2 Titles of Articles and Sections .................................................................................... 34 10.3 Notices and Demands ................................................................................................. 34 10.4 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury ............................ 35 10.5 Severability ................................................................................................................. 35 10.6 Consents and Approvals ............................................................................................. 35 10.7 Additional Documents ................................................................................................ 35 10.8 Limitation ................................................................................................................... 35 10.9 City/Authority Approval ............................................................................................ 36 10.10 Superseding Effect ..................................................................................................... 36 10.11 Relationship of Parties................................................................................................ 36 10.12 Survival of Terms ....................................................................................................... 36 10.13 Data Practices Act ...................................................................................................... 36 10.14 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability ........................ 36 Execution -iii- Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 10.15 City and Authority Regulatory Authority .................................................................. 36 10.16 Memorandum of Agreement ...................................................................................... 36 10.17 Limited Liability ........................................................................................................ 36 10.18 Time is of the Essence ................................................................................................ 37 10.19 Counterparts ............................................................................................................... 37 10.20 Amendments ............................................................................................................... 37 10.21 TIF District ................................................................................................................. 37 10.22 Term ........................................................................................................................... 37 10.23 Estoppel Certificate .................................................................................................... 37 Execution -iv- Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Legal Description of the Project Area Exhibit B Project Site Plan Exhibit C Final Development Plan Exhibit D Initial TIF Pro Forma Exhibit E Form of Go-Ahead Letter Exhibit F Form of Certificate of Completion with Completion Checklist Exhibit G Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement Exhibit H Form of TIF Note Exhibit I Form of SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement Exhibit J Sample IRR Calculations and TIF Adjustment Calculation Exhibit K Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide Exhibit L Form of Housing Restrictive Covenant Exhibit M Equity and Inclusion Community Engagement Plan Execution 1 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (4620 W. 77th Street) THIS REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into December 20, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and among the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”). RECITALS A. Pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended (the “TIF Act”), the Authority is authorized to finance certain eligible redevelopment costs of redevelopment projects with tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district established in accordance with the TIF Act. B. In 2014, the City and the Authority established the “Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District” (a redevelopment district) (the “TIF District”) pursuant to Sections 469.001 through 469.047, inclusive, of the TIF Act, in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of such designated area within the City (the “Redevelopment Area”). C. More than five (5) years has passed since the certification of the TIF District, so new activity within the TIF District, including, without limitation, the Minimum Improvements (as defined below), are subject to the “five-year rule” under Section 469.1763, Subd. 3 of the TIF Act and the corresponding provisions of Section 469.1763, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, which requires that not more than 25 percent of the total revenue derived from tax increment (as defined in the TIF Act) paid by properties in the TIF District (collectively, “Pooled Tax Increments”) may be expended on qualified activities in the project area that (i) are outside the geographic boundaries of the TIF District; or (ii) inside the TIF District but occurring after the initial five-year period, like the Minimum Improvements. D. Pursuant to the temporary authority for use of tax increments granted by Section 469.176, subdivision 4n of the TIF Act, on October 28, 2021, the Authority adopted, and on November 16, 2021, the City approved, a written spending plan for unobligated tax increment monies for the TIF District and other previously established tax increment financing districts in the City (the “Spending Plan”) and established the Special Projects and Redevelopment Capital Fund (the “SPaRC Fund”) to encourage and incentivize new private investment in the City’s commercial and industrial districts by providing loans, grants and/or equity for development projects in accordance with the Spending Plan. E. Developer is under contract to purchase that certain land within the Redevelopment Area located at 4620 W. 77th Street, as such land is legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the “Project Area”) from Pentagon North, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Pentagon North”), the current owner of the Project Area. F. Developer has requested, and the City has approved, pursuant to the City Approvals (as defined herein), rezoning of the Project Area to a Planned Unit Development and a final development plan for the redevelopment of Project Area. G. The Project Area is to be redeveloped by demolition of the existing three-level office building and related parking and improvements located within the Project Area and the phased development and construction of the buildings and other improvements generally described below (as well as those improvements, which benefit the Project on adjacent property owned by Pentagon North for access, ingress Execution 2 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 and other improvements required to complete the Minimum Improvements), as such Minimum Improvements are generally depicted on the Project Site Plan attached as Exhibit B as approved in the PUD Ordinance and incorporated into the Development Contract (collectively, the “Minimum Improvements”), and all to be constructed in accordance with the City Approvals and at the general scale and massing using the architectural quality, exterior finish materials and landscaping as shown in the Final Development Plan (as defined herein): (i) A single, seven-story building with approximately 276 apartment units (including at least (A) 110 workforce apartment units and (B) 28 affordable rental apartment units; (ii) the public plaza, sidewalk and streetscape improvements and amenities (the “Plaza and Streetscapes”) connecting 77th Street to Fred Richards Park and adjoining the Minimum Improvements, as required under the terms of the City Approvals and in the areas generally depicted on the Project Plans attached as Exhibit C, which Plaza and Streetscapes will be subject to the Public Access Easement (as defined herein); (iii) the fire truck road and vehicular park access road (the “Public Road”) located between the 4600 and 4570 W. 77th Street buildings and connecting 77th Street to Fred Richards Park, as required under the terms of the City Approvals and in the areas generally depicted on the Project Plans attached as Exhibit C, which Public Road will be subject to the Public Road Easement (as defined herein); and (iv) such other improvements required under the terms of the City Approvals. H. Upon completion, the Minimum Improvements are anticipated to deliver many benefits to the general public. In addition to the redevelopment of an underutilized building and long-term increase in the property tax base, this project will deliver additional public benefits including: creation of new affordable housing units, stormwater improvements, environmental remediation, streetscape improvements, public parking, and dedication of land for future roadway. Upon completion, this project will also enable several improvements to the local transportation network including improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. These improvements are intended to benefit this project, the surrounding neighborhoods and the general public who travel to and through this area. I. The Authority and the City have determined that (i) the redevelopment to occur through the proposed Minimum Improvements would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, (ii) that the proposed Minimum Improvements conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole, and (iii) that the proposed Minimum Improvements afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the TIF District by private enterprise, and, accordingly, the City and Authority believes the Minimum Improvements are in the best interest of the City and desire to assist in providing financial support for the Minimum Improvements from Pooled Tax Increments and the SPaRC Fund in accordance with this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated into the provisions of this Agreement by this reference, and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: Execution 3 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Article I Recitals; Exhibits, Definitions 1.1 Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. 1.2 Exhibits. All Exhibits referred to in and attached to this Agreement upon execution are incorporated in and form a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. 1.3 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise specifies or requires, the following terms have the following definitions. Certain other capitalized terms are defined elsewhere in this Agreement. All defined terms may be used in the singular or the plural, as the context requires. “Affordable Housing Requirements” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(a). “Affordable Units” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(a). “Agreement” means this Redevelopment Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented. “Authority” means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. “Authorized Representative” means, with respect to the Authority, the Executive Director of the Authority or its designee, and, with respect to the City, the City Manager or its designee. “Available Tax Increments” means Pooled Tax Increments that is Unobligated Increment and which have been actually received and retained by the Authority from the County during any applicable time frame, in accordance with the provisions of the TIF Act, including without limitation Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, less any administrative expenses incurred by the City and/or the Authority relating to the TIF District to the extent permitted by the TIF Act and to the extent that such expenses have not been paid or reimbursed to the City and/or the Authority, as applicable, by Developer. “Board” means the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. “Certificate of Completion” means a certificate in substantially the form attached as Exhibit F, signed by the Authorized Representative for the Authority, to be issued pursuant to the terms of Section 4.12. “City” means the City of Edina, Minnesota. “City Approvals” means, collectively, the PUD Ordinance, the Project Approval Resolution, the Final Development Plan, and the Development Contract, and all other approvals, permits, licenses, and agreements issued by or entered into with the City, the Authority, or other governmental authority relating to the Minimum Improvements, the Project Area and/or Developer. “City Consultants” means the financial, engineering, legal, TIF eligibility and other similar advisors to the City and the Authority. “City Council” means the City Council of the City. “City Easement(s)” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a). Execution 4 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 “City Parties” means the City and the Authority, and their respective governing body members and elected officials, officers, employees, agents, independent contractors and attorneys. “Commencement” means (i) with respect to pre-construction activities necessary for Commencement of the vertical construction of the Minimum Improvements (e.g., demolition, environmental remediation and site preparation), the date on which actual physical activity related to such pre-construction activity occurs and (ii) with respect to vertical construction of the Minimum Improvements, the date on which actual physical construction of the building foundation begins. “Completion” means (i) with respect to the Minimum Improvements, Developer’s receipt of the Certificate of Completion from the Authority for the housing component and (ii) with respect to the individual aspects of the Minimum Improvements described in the Minimum Improvements timeline set forth in Section 4.1, substantial completion of such aspect or element such that Developer can proceed with Commencement of the next aspect or element in a manner consistent with normal construction practices “County” means the County of Hennepin, Minnesota. “Cure Rights” means the rights to cure a Default as specified in Section 9.4 before such Default is deemed to be an Event of Default. “Default” means an act or omission by the City, the Authority or Developer which becomes an Event of Default under this Agreement if it is not cured following notice thereof from the other party pursuant to any applicable Cure Rights. “Default Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1(a). “Developer” means 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and its permitted successors and assigns in accordance with this Agreement. “Development Contract” means that certain Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the City on October 6, 2022, by and between the City and Developer, and recorded against Project Area. “Effective Date” means the date of this Agreement set forth in the preamble above. “Environmental Law” means any federal, state or local law, rule, regulation, ordinance, or other legal requirement relating to (a) a release or threatened release of any Hazardous Material, (b) pollution or protection of public health or the environment or (c) the manufacture, handling, transport, use, treatment, storage, or disposal of any Hazardous Material. “Event of Default” means any of the events by the City, the Authority or Developer described in Article IX. “Final Development Plan” means the final development plans for the Minimum Improvements as approved by the City pursuant to the Project Approval Resolution and the PUD Ordinance, and attached hereto as Exhibit C. “Financing Commitments” means financing commitments, binding term sheets and/or other evidence of Project financing commitments from debt and equity sources sufficient, with all other available sources of funding, to fund all costs to construct the Minimum Improvements, all in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Authority and disclosing (i) the identity of the mortgage lender(s), (ii) mortgage rate and terms, and (iii) an organizational chart of Developer with the identity of all equity sources with greater than Execution 5 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 a 10% direct ownership investment in the Project with management control, and the identify of any other investors that have direct management control of the Developer (a “Beneficial Interest”). “Go-Ahead Letter” means Developer’s letter to the City and the Authority, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit E, and including the Financing Commitments and stating that Developer is prepared to close on the acquisition of the Project Area and the financing for the construction of the Minimum Improvements, and is prepared to proceed with the construction of the Minimum Improvements. “Hazardous Material” means petroleum, asbestos-containing materials, and any substance, waste, pollutant, contaminant or material that is defined as hazardous or toxic in any Environmental Law. “Housing Restrictive Covenant” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(e). “Law” means federal, state, or local governmental or quasi-governmental laws, ordinances, rules, codes, regulations, directives, orders and/or requirements. “Market Return Rate” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(c)(i). “Memorandum of Agreement” means the document described in Section 10.16 and substantially in the form shown in Exhibit G. “Minimum Improvements” has the meaning set forth in Recital G. “Mortgage” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(a). “Obligated Increment” means the Tax Increment that is required and committed for payment of Outstanding Obligations. “Outstanding Obligations” means outstanding bonds, binding contracts, and other outstanding financial obligations of the TIF District (as such terms are defined in the TIF Act) issued prior to the date of this Agreement to which Tax Increment is pledged. “Pentagon North” means Pentagon North, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. “Plaza and Streetscapes” has the meaning set forth in Recital G. “Pooled Tax Increments” has the meaning set forth in Recital C. “Pooled TIF Qualified Costs” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(a). “Project” means the construction and development of the Minimum Improvements within the Project Area in accordance with the City Approvals and this Agreement. “Project Approval Resolution” means City Council Resolution No. 2022-92. “Project Area” has the meaning set forth in Recital E. “Project Site Plan” means the site plan for the Minimum Improvements attached as Exhibit B. “Public Access Easement” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a)(ii). Execution 6 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 “Public Road” has the set forth in Recital G. “Public Road Easement” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a)(ii). “PUD Ordinance” means City Ordinance No. 2022-08. “Qualified Redevelopment Costs” means, collectively, the Pooled TIF Qualified Costs and the SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs. “Redevelopment Area” has the meaning set forth in Recital B. “Related Party” means with respect to any person or entity (i) any other person or entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with such person or entity; or (ii) any other person or other entity in which the majority equity interest of such other person or entity is owned by the same parties that have a majority equity interest in the first person or entity. “SPaRC Fund” has the meaning set forth in Recital D. “SPaRC Forgivable Loan” has the meaning given in Section 3.5. “SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5. “Spending Plan” has the meaning set forth in Recital D. “State” means the state of Minnesota. “Tax Increment” means that portion of the real property taxes which is paid with respect to the TIF District and which is actually remitted to the Authority as tax increment of the TIF District pursuant to the TIF Act. The term Tax Increment does not include any amounts retained by or payable to the State auditor under Section 469.177, subdivision 11 of the TIF Act. “TIF” means tax increment financing pursuant to the TIF Act. “TIF Act ” has the meaning set forth in Recital A. “TIF Assistance” means reimbursement of Pooled TIF Qualified Costs through payments from the Authority to Developer of Available Tax Increments under the TIF Note, pursuant to the terms and conditions of Article III of this Agreement, the TIF Note, and the TIF Act. “TIF District” has the meaning set forth in Recital B. “TIF Note” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(a). “TIF Pro Forma” means a detailed financial pro forma for the Minimum Improvements, including total Minimum Improvements costs, sources and uses of financing, return calculations based on projected and/or actual (as applicable) income and expenses for the Minimum Improvements, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, and all as updated by Developer from time to time in accordance with this Agreement based on actual and/or projected Minimum Improvements information, as the same becomes available during the development of the Minimum Improvements. “Unavoidable Delays” means actual delays in the Commencement and Completion of the Minimum Improvements or any element thereof, outside the reasonable control of Developer, to extent Execution 7 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 such actual delays are a result of (i) unusually severe or prolonged bad weather, (ii) acts of God, acts of war, civil unrest, terrorism, criminal conduct of third parties, fire or other casualty to the Minimum Improvements, (iii) litigation commenced by third parties, (iv) actions or inactions of any federal, State, or local government unit which directly result in delays, including, but not limited to, a declared emergency under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 12 or due to pandemic or quarantine restrictions imposed by applicable Law, (v) strikes, or other labor trouble, industry-wide material shortages and delays in delivery, labor shortages; (vi) concealed or unknown site conditions not revealed and not reasonably anticipated prior to the Effective Date; (vii) pandemic and outbreaks of Covid-19 and variants thereof; and/or (viii) other events beyond Developer’s reasonable control which Developer could not reasonably foresee would occur and which Developer would have been reasonably expected to take measures to avoid or minimize, in each case, not resulting from the act or omission of Developer (or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees), and in each instance to the extent Developer gives written notice to the Authority and City within ten (10) business days after either the occurrence of such event giving rise to each Unavoidable Delay or Developer’s reasonable realization that the occurrence will cause an Unavoidable Delay. “Unobligated Increment” means any Tax Increment not required for payment of Outstanding Obligations due during the six months following the transfer of Tax Increment for Outstanding Obligations. “Workforce Housing Requirements” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(c). “Workforce Units” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(c). Article II Representations and Warranties 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City. The City makes the following representations and warranties: (a) The City is a Minnesota municipal corporation and has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. The City has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. (b) There is not pending, nor to the best of the City’s knowledge is there threatened, any suit, action or proceeding against the City before any court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other governmental authority that may materially and adversely affect the validity of any of the transactions contemplated hereby, the ability of the City to perform its obligations hereunder or as contemplated hereby, or the validity or enforceability of this Agreement. (c) To the best of the City’s knowledge and belief, no member of the City Council or officer of the City, has either a direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement, nor will any City Councilmember or officer of the City, benefit financially from this Agreement within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.009, as amended. (d) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, and any other documents, instruments or actions required or contemplated pursuant to this Agreement by the City does not, and consummation of the transactions contemplated therein and the fulfillment of the terms thereof will not conflict with or constitute on the part of the City a breach of or default under any existing agreement or instrument to which the City is a party or violate any law, charter or other proceeding or action establishing or relating to the establishment and powers of the City or its officers, officials or resolutions. Execution 8 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Authority. The Authority makes the following representations and warranties: (a) The Authority is a public body corporate and politic and a governmental subdivision of the State, duly organized and existing under State law and the Authority has the authority to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (b) Except as provided in this Agreement, and provided that the Authority will fund fiscal disparities from within the TIF District, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, the Authority agrees to retain all of the captured net tax capacity of the Project Area to finance the Pooled TIF Qualified Costs as provided in this Agreement, and will elect that the duration of the TIF District will be the maximum duration permitted by the TIF Act. The Authority will not voluntarily take any action to reduce the amount of captured tax capacity retained to finance the Pooled TIF Qualified Costs or to further reduce the duration of the District until the amount paid to Developer from Available Tax Increments reaches the maximum amount specified in Article III. (c) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and any other documents or instruments required pursuant to this Agreement by the Authority does not, and consummation of the transactions contemplated therein and the fulfillment of the terms thereof will not, conflict with or constitute on the part of the Authority a breach of or default under any existing (i) indenture, mortgage, deed of trust or other agreement or instrument to which the Authority is a party or by which the Authority or any of its property is or may be bound, (ii) legislative act, constitution or other proceeding establishing or relating to the establishment of the Authority or its officers or its resolutions, or (iii) any Minnesota statute or any provisions of any bond, debenture, loan agreement, regulation or order of the United States of America or the State, or any agency or political subdivisions thereof or any court order or judgment in any proceeding to which the Authority is or was a party by which it is bound. (d) There is not pending, nor to the best of the Authority’s knowledge is there threatened, any suit, action or proceeding against the Authority before any court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other governmental authority that may materially and adversely affect the validity of any of the transactions contemplated hereby, the ability of the Authority to perform its obligations hereunder or as contemplated hereby, or the validity or enforceability of this Agreement. (e) To the best of the Authority’s knowledge and belief, no member of the Board of the Authority or officer of the Authority, has either a direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement, nor will any Commissioner of the Authority or officer of the Authority, benefit financially from this Agreement within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.009, as amended. 2.3 Representations and Warranties of Developer. Developer represents and warrants that: (a) Developer is a limited liability company organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of Minnesota, is not in violation of any provisions of its operating agreement or other organizational documents or the laws of the State, has power to enter into this Agreement and has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by proper action of its members. (b) Developer holds a valid purchase contract to acquire the Project Area at a market price that is reflective of current regional market for redevelopment projects of the size and quality of the Minimum Improvements. The transaction contemplated by such purchase contract, as the same may be amended, is an arm’s length transaction and the buyer and seller have no other business relationship with respect to the Minimum Improvements. Execution 9 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, and the fulfillment of the terms and conditions thereof do not and will not conflict with or result in a breach of any material terms or conditions of Developer’s organizational documents, any restriction or any agreement or instrument to which Developer is now a party or by which it is bound or to which any property of Developer is subject, and do not and will not constitute a default under any of the foregoing or to the best of Developer’s knowledge be a violation of any order, decree, statute, rule or regulation of any court or of any state or Federal regulatory body having jurisdiction over Developer or its properties, including its interest in the Minimum Improvements, and do not and will not result in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge or encumbrance of any nature upon any of the property or assets of Developer contrary to the terms of any instrument or agreement to which Developer is a party or by which it is bound. (d) To the best of Developer’s knowledge and belief, the execution and delivery of this Agreement will not create a conflict of interest prohibited by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.009, as amended. (e) Developer would not construct the Minimum Improvements, but for the execution of this Agreement and the TIF Assistance for the Qualified Redevelopment Costs and other public assistance contemplated to be made available hereunder. (f) There are no pending or to the best of Developer’s knowledge, threatened legal proceedings, of which Developer has notice, contemplating the liquidation or dissolution of Developer or threatening its existence, or seeking to restrain or enjoin the transactions contemplated by the Agreement, or questioning the authority of Developer to execute and deliver this Agreement or the validity of this Agreement. (g) Neither Developer nor any Related Party of Developer is currently delinquent in the payment of any business, occupation, sales, use, gross receipts, rental, real and personal property and other similar taxes imposed with respect to any real property owned or leased by any of such parties in the State. (h) Developer has not received any notice from any local, state or federal official that the activities of Developer or the Authority with respect to the Project Area may or will be in violation of any Environmental Law, except as has been identified in any report, audit, inspection or survey, undertaken by or provided to the City and the Authority. Developer represents that to the best of Developer’s knowledge: (i) it is not aware of any state or federal claim filed or planned to be filed by any party relating to any violation of any local, state or federal Environmental Law, regulation or review procedure, and (ii) it is not aware of any violation of any local, state or federal law, regulation or review procedure which would give any person a valid claim under any Environmental Law, including the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act or the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act. (i) Developer reasonably expects that it will be able to obtain private financing in an amount sufficient, together with funds provided by the Authority and any other public agencies, to enable Developer to successfully construct the Minimum Improvements, as provided herein. Article III Public Assistance 3.1 Pooled TIF Qualified Costs. Execution 10 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (a) Costs and expense for the items described below, initially paid by Developer from Developer’s own sources and incurred in furtherance of the construction and development of the Minimum Improvements, shall be eligible for TIF Assistance under the terms and conditions of this Agreement (collectively, “Pooled TIF Qualified Costs”): Pooled TIF Qualified Costs Approx. Cost Stormwater for public amenities not constructed within the pedestrian plaza $250,000 Sustainability certification (see Section 4.8) $851,000 Increased costs related to unfavorable soil conditions: a) Grouted pilings and soil corrections for building b) Excavation, load transfer platform and footings c) Added podium concrete structure d) Podium landscaping, access and water retention e) Added building utility length, soil corrections and structure a) $1,800,000 b) $1,200,000 c) $3,600,000 d) $800,000 e) $450,000 Site preparation, foundation, demolition and abatement of existing office building $250,000 The Public Road, including related soil corrections and added ADA office access $250,000 Reimbursement of the City’s and the Authority’s professional costs and Developer legal costs related to preparation of this Agreement $180,000 Total $9,631,000 (b) The actual amount of Pooled TIF Qualified Costs within each of the foregoing categories may be allocated among such categories (in amounts that differ from these set forth in the table above), subject to reasonable review and approval by the Authority, and provided that Developer must provide reasonable evidence of the actual amounts of Qualified Redevelopment Cost actually incurred or committed in each such category. 3.2 TIF Note. (a) TIF Note. In order for Developer to obtain the TIF Assistance contemplated by this Agreement, the Authority shall issue, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, one “pay- as-you-go” TIF note (“TIF Note”) in substantially the form attached as Exhibit H, with a maximum term expiring in the year 2044, and in the aggregate maximum principal amount of not to exceed $7,351,000.00, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 3.3, and in no event shall the principal amount of the TIF Note exceed 10% of the actual, documented costs of the Minimum Improvements as shown in the updated TIF Pro Forma provided by Developer pursuant to Section 3.3(c). Execution 11 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (b) Interest. The TIF Note shall bear simple interest on the unpaid principal balance thereof at a fixed rate equal to 6.0%. (c) Payments and Interest. Semi-annual payments on the TIF Note from Available Tax Increment and accrual of interest on the unpaid principal balance of the TIF Note will commence upon the Authority’s issuance of the TIF Note, all in accordance with terms and condition set forth in the TIF Note. (d) Condition of Issuance. The Authority’s obligation to issue the TIF Note to Developer is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: (i) Developer shall have provided evidence satisfactory to the Authority that Developer has actually incurred (A) Pooled TIF Qualified Costs in an amount equal to at least the amount of the requested TIF Note and (B) total Minimum Improvements costs corresponding to the line item detail (subject to the use of Developer’s contingencies as provided in Section 3.3(c)(ii)) shown in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit D; (ii) Developer shall have provided evidence satisfactory to the Authority that all parties have been paid for work related to the completion of the Minimum Improvements (e.g., lien waivers or similar); (iii) Developer shall have provided the updated TIF Pro Forma to the Authority, and the Authority shall have completed their review, analysis, and audit of the same as necessary to determine the original principal amount of the TIF Note in accordance with Section 3.3(c); (iv) Developer shall have submitted documentation necessary to secure all grant payments as well as other documents to administer the closing of all grant agreements. (v) Developer shall have granted, and/or shall have caused the then-current owner of the applicable portion of Project Area to grant, to the City and/or the Authority, as applicable, each of the City Easements and the Housing Restrictive Covenant; Developer shall have obtained all applicable mortgagee consents to such City Easements and the Housing Restrictive Covenant; and each of the City Easements and the Housing Restrictive Covenant, the respective mortgagee consents shall have been recorded; (vi) Developer shall have satisfied the Environmental Sustainability requirements set forth in Section 4.8 and Developer has delivered such reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority requires in order to confirm the same; (vii) Developer has delivered to the Authority a final report and certificate detailing and certifying as to Developer’s activities and final outcomes of Developer’s efforts to achieve the Equity and Inclusion goals under Section 4.9 of this Agreement; (viii) No Developer Default or Developer Event of Default exist under this Agreement and no Developer default shall exist under any of the City Approvals, City Easements, or any other agreement pertaining to the Minimum Improvements; (ix) Developer has met all requirements of the City corresponding to the Development Contract for the Minimum Improvements; and Execution 12 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (x) the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements shall have been issued by the Authority in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. (e) No Representation or Warranty. Payments of principal and interest under the TIF Note shall be payable solely from Available Tax Increments. The Authority does not represent or warrant the amounts of Available Tax Increments that will be available for payment principal and interest under the TIF Note. The Authority will not reimburse Developer for Pooled TIF Qualified Costs from Authority revenues, other than from Available Tax Increments, nor guaranty the amount of money which Developer will receive as a reimbursement, such amount being payable solely from the Available Tax Increments in accordance with this section, unless the Authority elects, in its sole and absolute discretion, with no obligation to do so, to pay down the TIF Note from other funds. 3.3 TIF Assistance and Potential Adjustment. (a) Generally. The financial assistance to Developer under this Agreement is based on certain assumptions regarding anticipated costs and expenses associated with constructing the Minimum Improvements. Specifically, the maximum aggregate principal amount of the TIF Note has been determined based on the amount of assistance needed to make the Minimum Improvements financially feasible, as shown in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit D. The Authority and Developer agree that those assumptions will be reviewed at the times described in this section, and that the amount of TIF Assistance provided herein shall be adjusted in accordance with this Section 3.3. (b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings: (i) “Cash Flow” means Net Operating Income less debt service (principal and interest) with respect to the Mortgage loan(s) encumbering the Minimum Improvements. (ii) “Cash-on-Cost Return” means Net Operating Income divided by the sum of the total actual cost of the Minimum Improvements (less any grants, forgivable loans (including the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan), or City, Authority, federal or State funds received by Developer) as set forth in an updated TIF Pro Forma. For purposes of clarity, an example calculation of the Cash-On-Cost Return is included in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit D. (iii) “IRR” means the internal rate of return for the Minimum Improvements, where the IRR is calculated as the annualized return of the annual cash flow over the applicable period on Developer’s actual utilization of equity for Minimum Improvements costs. For purposes of clarity, example calculations of IRR are attached hereto in Exhibit J. (iv) “Net Operating Income” means total income and other Project-derived revenue, including payments under the TIF Note, less Operating Expenses. (v) “Operating Expenses” means reasonable and customary expenses incurred in operating the Minimum Improvements, as well as any costs shared with the adjacent property owner arising out of any private easements required to access and operate the Minimum Improvements, including, but not limited to all management and related expenses, all real estate taxes and special assessments for the Project Area. Execution 13 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (c) Confirmation of TIF Assistance Upon Completion. (i) Market Rate Return. After substantial completion of the Minimum Improvements, but before, and as a condition to, issuance of the Certificate of Completion and issuance of the TIF Note, Developer shall provide to the Authority an updated TIF Pro Forma based on actual, documented costs of the Minimum Improvements and any reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority requires in order to calculate the reasonably anticipated Cash-on-Cost Return for the Minimum Improvements and to otherwise confirm that the “but for” finding adopted by the City and the Authority continues to be satisfied. The Authority may retain a financial advisor, accountant, and/or other professional with similar expertise to audit the submitted updated TIF Pro Forma, at Developer’s cost. If the updated TIF Pro Forma demonstrates that the Cash-on-Cost Return for the Minimum Improvements (based on the forecasted stabilized operations in the updated TIF Pro Forma) exceeds 7.00% (the “Market Return Rate”), then the amount of TIF Assistance provided herein, as reflected in the principal amount of the TIF Note, shall be reduced based on the actual TIF Assistance that is sufficient to assist the Minimum Improvements to achieve the Market Return Rate based on the updated TIF Pro Forma. (ii) Contingency Funds and Allowances. The maximum principal amount of the TIF Note is currently calculated based on the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit D, including Developer’s use of the contingency funds and escalation allowances. Developer shall provide the Authority documentation identifying the actual use of all contingency funds and escalation allowances and the same shall be identified in detail in the updated TIF Pro Forma delivered in accordance with Section 3.3(c)(i). For purposes of the TIF Assistance provided herein and the final principal amount of the TIF Note, all contingency funds and escalation allowances shall be used only for costs related to actual, documented increased costs for the Minimum Improvements, and the principal amount of the TIF Note may be reduced if any such contingency funds and/or escalation allowances have been used by Developer (A) for material changes to the Minimum Improvements not approved by the Authority hereunder, (B) in a manner that enhances the residential amenities and private spaces of the Minimum Improvements with no benefit to the public, and/or (C) for costs or expenses unrelated to the Minimum Improvements. The Authority shall not unreasonably withhold material changes to the Minimum Improvements that provide benefit to the public. (d) Determination of Project Excess Returns upon sale of the Minimum Improvements. (i) No later than 30 days after each sale of all or part of the Minimum Improvements to any party other than a Related Party occurring prior to the date upon which the TIF Note is paid in full or terminated hereunder, Developer shall submit to the Authority an updated TIF Pro Forma and any other reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority requires in order to calculate the IRR for such sale, including, without limitation, a certified cost and revenue analysis for such sale prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“Sale Pro Forma”). This analysis will include, without limitation, all acquisition costs, Qualified Redevelopment Costs, and all other improvement and redevelopment costs incurred by Developer for the Minimum Improvements, as well as historical Net Operating Income, debt service, and TIF Note payments. The Authority may retain a financial advisor, accountant, and/or other Execution 14 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 professional with similar expertise to audit the submitted Sale Pro Forma, at Developer’s cost. (ii) The Sale Pro Forma and related information shall be used by the Authority to determine whether the sale yields a “Project Excess Return” to Developer. The IRR shall be used to measure any Project Excess Return in accordance with the following sliding scale: Period of Sale IRR beyond which Project Excess Return is created Before three (3) years after Completion 22.0 % From three (3) years to five (5) years after Completion 20.0 % From six (6) years to nine (9) years after Completion 18.0 % More than nine (9) years after Completion 16.0 % Should the Developer’s proceeds of such sale of the Minimum Improvements, or a part thereof, exceed the applicable IRR (i.e., the Project Excess Return), payments on the TIF Note shall cease, the outstanding balance forgiven, and the TIF Note shall automatically terminate. The termination of the TIF Note shall be the sole consequence if there is a Project Excess Return and the Developer shall not be required to pay the Authority any amount in which the Project Excess Return exceeds the then outstanding principal balance of the TIF Note. (iii) If the sale does not result in Excess Returns to Developer, then payments on the TIF Note shall continue pursuant to the terms of the existing TIF Note. In addition, if the sale does not result in Excess Returns to Developer, Developer shall require the purchaser to (1) accept assignment of the TIF Note (unless the TIF Note has previously been assigned pursuant to Section 8.2) and (2) assume Developer’s obligations under this Agreement; and (3) provide written evidence of the same to the Authority. 3.4 Assignment of Note. Subject to Developer’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section 3.4, the TIF Note will transfer to Developer’s successor at the time of any assignment of this Agreement by Developer made in accordance with Section 8.2. Except for such assignments, the TIF Note shall not be assignable or transferable without the prior written consent of the Authority, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld (subject to, without limitation, the provisions of Section 8.2(b)); provided, however, Developer may, without the City’s or the Authority’s consent, but upon prior written notice to the Authority (a) assign the TIF Note, together with Developer’s rights and obligations under this Agreement to a Related Party pursuant to Section 8.2(a)(iv) hereof and/or (b) collaterally assign Developer’s rights and obligations under this Agreement and the TIF Note to the holder of any Mortgage that is permitted under the terms of Section 5.1. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, as a condition to any transfer or assignment of the TIF Note, any assignee or transferee must execute and deliver to the Authority a certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Authority, pursuant to which, among other things, such assignee or transferee acknowledges and represents: Execution 15 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (i) the limited nature of the Authority’s payment obligations under the TIF Note; (ii) that the TIF Note is being acquired for investment for such assignee’s or transferee’s own account, not as a nominee or agent, and not with a view to the resale or distribution of any part thereof; (iii) that the assignee or transferee has no present intention of selling, granting any participation in, or otherwise distributing the same; (iv) that the assignee or transferee, either alone or with such assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters and is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment in the TIF Note and the assignee or transferee is able to bear the economic consequences thereof; (v) that in making its decision to acquire the TIF Note, the assignee or transferee has relied upon independent investigations made by the assignee or transferee and, to the extent believed by such assignee or transferee to be appropriate, the assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, including its own professional, tax and other advisors, and has not relied upon any representation or warranty from the Authority, or any of its officers, employees, agents, affiliates or representatives, with respect to the value of the TIF Note; (vi) that the Authority has not made any warranty, acknowledgment or covenant, in writing or otherwise, to the assignee or transferee regarding the tax consequences, if any, of the acquisition and investment in the TIF Note; (vii) that the assignee or transferee or its representatives have been given a full opportunity to examine all documents and to ask questions of, and to receive answers from, the Authority and its representatives concerning the terms of the TIF Note and such other information as the assignee or transferee desires in order to evaluate the acquisition of and investment in the TIF Note, and all such questions have been answered to the full satisfaction of the assignee or transferee; (viii) that the assignee or transferee has evaluated the merits and risks of investment in the TIF Note and has determined that the TIF Note is a suitable investment for the assignee or transferee in light of such party’s overall financial condition and prospects; (ix) that the TIF Note will be characterized as “restricted securities” under the federal securities laws because the TIF Note is being acquired in a transaction not involving a public offering and that under such laws and applicable regulations such securities may not be resold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except in certain limited circumstances; and (x) for purposes of federal securities laws, that no market for the TIF Note exists and no market for the TIF Note is intended to be developed. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Section 3.4, the holder of the TIF Note may be different than the owner of the Project Area or the party responsible for the obligations of Developer under the Execution 16 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Redevelopment Agreement, provided, however, that such holder will be subject to all limitations and conditions to payments under the TIF Note set forth herein. 3.5 SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan. In consideration of Developer’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement, and subject the conditions precedent to closing set forth in Section 3.6 and in the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement (defined below), the Authority agrees to provide Developer a forgivable loan funded through the SPaRC Fund (the “SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan”) to Developer in the maximum principal amount of $2,000,000.00, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a loan agreement in substantially the form attached as Exhibit I (the “SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement”). Costs and expense for the items included within the Minimum Improvements described below necessary for the operation of the Project, shall be eligible for reimbursement from the SPaRC Fund under the terms and conditions of the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement (collectively, “SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs”): SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs Approx. Cost Pedestrian plaza and related improvements, including streetscape and landscape $414,000 Signage, wayfinding and monument related to the Park $80,000 Improvements for vehicular access via permanent easement on Pentagon North property $1,000,000 Area stormwater management and treatment (tanks will be within the public plaza) $214,000 Soil corrections and utilities for all public areas $300,000 Total $2,008,000 The actual amount of SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs within each of the foregoing categories may be allocated among such categories (in amounts that differ from these set forth in the table above), subject to reasonable review and approval by the Authority, and provided that Developer must provide reasonable evidence of the actual amounts of SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs actually incurred or committed in each such category. All SPaRC Fund Qualified Costs must be expended by the Developer prior to November 15, 2025, and reasonable evidence of such expenditures provided to the Authority by the same date. 3.6 Conditions Precedent to SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Closing. The Authority shall not be obligated to close on the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan pursuant to the Forgivable Loan Agreement until the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: (a) Developer shall have executed and delivered to the Authority the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement and all additional instruments and security instruments required under the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement and, as applicable, caused the same to be recorded against the Project Area; (b) Developer shall have satisfied all conditions precedent set forth in the Forgivable Loan Agreement and delivery of the City Easements as required in the Development Contract. Execution 17 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 3.7 Action to Reduce Taxes. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Developer shall take no action, and suffer no circumstances to exist or action to be taken by others (to the extent Developer may prevent the same), the effect of which would be to render the Project Area or any portion thereof to be no longer generally subject to real property taxation. Before the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Developer shall not: (a) seek administrative review or judicial review of the applicability of any tax statute relating to the taxation of the Project Area determined by any tax official to be applicable or raise the inapplicability of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings; (b) seek administrative review or judicial review of the constitutionality of any tax statute relating to the taxation of the Project Area determined by any tax official, or raise the unconstitutionality of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings; or (c) seek any tax deferral or abatement, either presently or prospectively authorized under any state or federal law, of the taxation of the Project Area. Article IV Requirements for Minimum Improvements 4.1 Commencement and Completion of Minimum Improvements. (a) Minimum Improvements Timeline. The timeline for the Commencement and Completion of the Minimum Improvements is identified in this Section 4.1. Following Commencement, construction or other activity must continue in a sequence consistent with normal redevelopment and construction practices, subject to Unavoidable Delays. Failure to meet any of the dates identified as “Default Date” shall be considered a Default, unless mutually determined to be the result of Unavoidable Delay. The Commencement and Completion timeline for the Minimum Improvements is as follow: Description of Work Commencement Date Completion Date Anticipated Default Date Anticipated Default Date Final City Approvals 10/6/2022 Not Applicable Not applicable Not applicable Real Estate Acquisition Closing 3/1/2023 6/1/2025 Not applicable Not applicable Demolition 4/1/2023 7/1/2025 6/1/2023 10/1/2025 Site Remediation 6/1/2023 8/1/2025 7/1/2023 11/1/2025 Site Preparation 9/1/2023 9/1/2025 10/1/2023 12/1/2025 Financial Closing 3/1/2023 12/1/2025 Not applicable Not applicable Foundation 10/1/2023 10/1/2025 10/1/2023 6/1/2026 Execution 18 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Core Construction 12/1/2023 12/1/2025 9/1/2025 8/1/2027 Certificate of Occupancy* Not applicable Not applicable 9/1/2025 9/1/2027 *While the final certificate of occupancy is preferred, temporary certificate of occupancy will be acceptable and will not result in a Default provided that all of the residential floors are capable of being occupied and that all of the commercial areas are capable of being occupied, subject to the completion of commercial tenant improvement(s), build-out and leasing. (b) Anticipated Market Value of Minimum Improvements. It is anticipated that upon completion, the total market value of the Minimum Improvements will be approximately $85,303,000. 4.2 Zoning and Land Use Approvals. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the authority of the City with respect to zoning and land use approvals. Subject to the foregoing, the staff of the Authority shall cooperate with Developer and assist Developer in the processing and obtaining of zoning and land use approvals. Developer shall be responsible for applying for and obtaining all land use and zoning approvals necessary for the Minimum Improvements, including, without limitation, any conditions contained in the City Approvals. All zoning and land use approvals shall be by the City Council or the City Planning Commission in accordance with the ordinances of the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing and for avoidance of doubt, in addition to the Authority’s other rights and remedies hereunder, the Authority’s consent shall be required for any material changes to the Minimum Improvements, specifically including, without limitation, changes to the scale, massing or exterior finish materials set forth in the original City Approvals that could materially reduce the taxable value of the Project Area. 4.3 Building and Construction Permits. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the governmental authority of the City with respect to its building and construction permitting process for the Minimum Improvements. Developer shall comply with all applicable City building codes and construction requirements and shall be responsible for obtaining all building permits prior to construction. 4.4 Restrictions on Development. Developer may not construct or permit construction of any of the Minimum Improvements until Developer satisfies the following conditions: (a) The Project Area is properly subdivided in accordance with applicable Law. (b) Developer executes and records the Development Contract against the Project Area, and causes any lien holder affecting any of the property to subject its interest as provided in this Agreement and in the Development Contract; (c) Developer satisfies all of the conditions precedent to construction of the Minimum Improvements established by the City in the City Approvals; and (d) Developer executes and records a Memorandum of Agreement in accordance with Section 10.16 hereof. 4.5 Submission and Approval of Evidence of Financing . No later than the issuance of the applicable construction or building permit for the Minimum Improvements (but excluding demolition permits), Developer shall provide the Authority with the Go-Ahead Letter, including the Financing Commitments for both debt and equity. If Developer fails to submit the Go-Ahead Letter and the foregoing information acceptable to the Authority within said period of time or any additional period to which the Execution 19 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Authority may agree, the Authority may notify Developer of its failure to comply with the requirement of this Section 4.5, such failure being a Default hereunder. 4.6 Affordable Housing and Workforce Housing. (a) Affordable Housing Requirements. Developer covenants that at least 10% of the residential units within the Minimum Improvements, but in no event fewer than 28 of such residential units (the “Affordable Units”) will be leased at rates (inclusive of utilities and mandatory fees) that are considered affordable to individuals or households earning less than 50% of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Area Median Income for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area for a period of 20 years commencing on the date that all the Affordable Units are first occupied by qualified households (the “Affordable Housing Requirements”). (b) The Affordable Housing Requirements shall also incorporate and include the following conditions and requirements: (i) no security deposit shall be required in excess of the amount of one month of rent in connection with any Affordable Unit; (ii) during the final year of the affordability period, new leases for the Affordable Units must be for a term of no less than six months, and such newly leased Affordable Units will be subject to all the Affordable Housing Requirements until the expiration of such new leases; (iii) Developer shall affirmatively market the Affordable Units to one or more traditionally underserved populations as affordable at the rates required hereunder; (iv) prior to Commencement of the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall notify the Authority of Developer’s initial determination as to whether the Affordable Units will be “fixed” to particular housing units within the Minimum Improvements or floating among various housing units with the Minimum Improvements. If the Affordable Units are to be fixed, Developer shall provide the Authority with the unit numbers of such fixed Affordable Units; (v) the two-bedroom units must be leased to households consisting of at least two members; (vi) During the affordability period, Developer will not refuse to lease an Affordable Unit to the holder of a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, or any other housing assistance program, solely because of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. (vii) the Affordable Units shall be subject to the terms and condition of the Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide (“Policy Guide”), a current version of which is attached as Exhibit K, provided, however, the Affordable Housing Requirements hereunder shall not include changes in the Policy Guide adopted by the City which differ from the Policy Guide attached as Exhibit K; and (viii) Developer shall, upon annual invoicing, reimburse the City (or such subdivision of the City administrating the Affordable Housing Requirements) for third- party expenses related to monitoring of Developer’s compliance with the Affordable Execution 20 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Housing Requirements, which such costs shall initially not exceed $2,700 per year (plus any additional costs necessitated by re-inspections for noncompliance with the Affordable Housing Requirements) and thereafter be subject to reasonable adjustment from time to time. (ix) The Affordable Units shall consist of at least, twenty (20) one bedroom units, and eight (8) two bedroom units. Any change in the foregoing distribution of units shall require the prior written approval of the Authority, which such consent will not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. Any change in the unit distribution shall be accounted for in any updated TIF Pro Forma. (x) of the affordable units shall have the same access to building amenities as residents of the market-rate units. The level of finish within the affordable units must be consistent with the level of finish within new construction, affordable apartments in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. (xi) On or about the date which is one year before the original expiration of the Affordable Housing Requirements, the Authority and Developer shall negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of an extension of initial 20-year term of the Affordable Housing Requirements. All parties agree to negotiate in good faith but without binding either party to a particular outcome, including binding the Developer to an extension of the 20-year term, if the parties are unable to agree upon terms and conditions acceptable to Developer. (c) Workforce Housing Requirements. Developer covenants that at least 110 of the residential units within the Minimum Improvements (excluding the Affordable Units) (the “Workforce Units”) will be leased at rates (inclusive of utilities and mandatory fees) that are considered affordable to individuals or households earning less than 120% of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Area Median Income for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area for the duration of the TIF Note payments (the “Workforce Housing Requirements”). At least 30 days prior to each semi-annual TIF Note payment, Developer shall provide the Authority with a certification of rent rolls for the previous six-month period, which show that the Workforce Units are rented in accordance with this Section. (d) Compliance with Affordable Housing Requirements and Workforce Housing Requirements. For avoidance of doubt, any failure by Developer to comply with the Affordable Housing Requirements and Workforce Housing Requirements will be a Default under this Agreement and, if such Default is not cured within any applicable notice and cure period hereunder, it shall be an Event of Default, during which, in addition to the City’s and Authority’s other rights and remedies hereunder, payments and accrual of interest on the TIF Note shall be suspended. (e) Restrictive Covenant. The Affordable Housing Requirements and the Workforce Housing Requirements will be set forth in a restrictive covenant in substantially the form shown in the attached Exhibit L and to be recorded against the Project Area prior to, and as a condition to, the issuance of the TIF Note (the “Housing Restrictive Covenant”). The Housing Restrictive Covenant shall not be subordinated or junior to any Mortgage on the Minimum Improvements, and if any Mortgage exists at the time the Housing Restrictive Covenant is to be recorded, Developer shall cause the mortgagee under such Mortgage to subordinates the Mortgage and the lien thereof to the Housing Restrictive Covenant. 4.7 Public Easements Execution 21 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (a) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion and as a condition to issuance of the TIF Note, Developer shall grant, and/or shall have caused the then-current owner of the applicable portion of Project Area to grant, to the City or the Authority (at City and Authority’s discretion) the following easement with respect to the Minimum Improvements (each a “City Easement”, and collectively the “City Easements”): (i) A permanent, public easement for access and use of the Plaza and Streetscapes (the “Public Access Easement”), subject to reasonable, nondiscriminatory limitations, rules and regulations governing its use adopted by Developer and subject to the approval of the City Manager or its designee. The Public Access Easement shall be granted pursuant to easement agreements in the form as required in the Development Contract. (ii) A permanent, public easement for access and use of the Public Road (the “Public Road Easement”), subject to reasonable, nondiscriminatory limitations, rules and regulations governing its use adopted by Developer and subject to the approval of the City Manager or its designee, and Pentagon North. The Public Road Easement shall be granted pursuant to easement agreements in the form as required in the Development Contract. (b) Other Terms of the City Easements. Neither the City nor the Authority will pay an acquisition cost to Developer for any of the City Easements. Each City Easement must be recorded by Developer as a condition to issuance of the TIF Note. Developer shall, at Developer’s sole cost and expense, cause a licensed surveyor to determine the final, actual legal description of the Plaza and Streetscapes and the Public Road for the purpose of the granting the City Easements with respect to such elements. Such legal descriptions will be consistent with the areas and boundaries of such areas as described and depicted in the City Approvals and the exhibits to this Agreement. (c) Future Transit Easements. Developer agrees to grant on terms reasonably agreed to by Developer, future easements for future mass transit (e.g., bus) stops in open areas of the Project Area adjoining public rights-of-way and the Public Access Easement area at no cost to the City, the Authority, or the responsible transit agency(ies), subject only to the responsible transit agency(ies) being responsible for initial construction, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the surface improvements in any future easement area. 4.8 Environmental Sustainability. (a) The Minimum Improvements must be designed and certified with appropriate standards that provide a greater degree of sustainability than Minnesota building code, all in accordance with, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the City Approvals. 4.9 Equity and Inclusion. (a) Generally; Workforce Goals. Developer shall, and shall cause its general contractor to, use good faith efforts as defined by Minnesota Department of Human Rights to include businesses that are majority owned by under-represented groups including minorities, women, veterans and people with disabilities in the development and construction of the Minimum Improvements. Developer shall, and shall cause its general contractor to, use, good faith efforts to employ under-represented people on the construction site for the Minimum Improvements. Developer commits to use good faith efforts to try to maximize participation opportunities for the local workforce, including women and minorities and will cause its general contractor to deliver, as a condition to issuance of any Certificate of Completion, a certification Execution 22 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 that the general contractor has, in completion of the Project, taken the “good faith efforts” specified in Section 4.9(b). (b) Good Faith Efforts. For the purpose of this section, “good faith efforts” shall be defined by compliance with the following: (i) At the Project Area • Post EEO policy and anti-harassment policies prominently on employee bulletin boards and job sites. Update at least once a year with new contact information and signature of the contractor’s chief executive officer. • Post all government-mandated posters (Minnesota, federal, local) in areas available to employees and applicants and on all job sites. • All job sites to the extent possible should be accessible to people with disabilities, specifically people with mobility impairments (restrooms, break-rooms, etc.). If all restrooms are not accessible, provide comparable facilities for people with disabilities. • Check employee locker rooms, break rooms, restrooms, and work areas (job sites) for potentially offensive cartoons, etc. (ii) Recruiting • All personnel involved in hiring, selection, promotion, disciplinary and related processes should be trained to ensure the elimination of bias (implicit bias training) in personnel actions. • Include an EEO tagline or similar statement in all want ads or other external job announcements. If you post jobs on your web site, include an EEO tagline. • Communicate to any union to ensure that such union accepts people for membership in a nondiscriminatory way and that they refer people to jobs fairly. • Make formal and informal contact with community organizations, apprenticeship training organizations, and unions, and other recruitment organizations (specifically those organizations that focus on women, people of color, Indigenous people, and people with disabilities) that may be able to refer qualified applicants for jobs you have available. • Provide training, preparation and workplace accommodations so that people with disabilities can have rewarding careers. • Contact the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Vocational Rehabilitation Services unit for the purpose of forming partnerships to help prepare people with disabilities for meaningful employment opportunities. Execution 23 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 • Participate in construction community job fairs or other construction-related events. • When using paid advertising, include news media or websites geared toward women, communities of color, and/or people with disabilities. (iii) Selection and Hiring • Review your application form and remove any questions that are not job-related. Include an EEO statement on the form itself. Review the application to make sure no illegal/potentially illegal information is requested. • Review EEO/Applicant tracking surveys: they should ask for necessary tracking information only and should be clearly marked as voluntary. Remove the forms from the application itself before the selection process begins. • Make sure supervisors are using legal criteria in their hiring decisions. • If you use any pre-employment tests (math tests, typing tests, skill tests, “personality” or “integrity” tests), these tests should directly relate to the jobs for which they’re used. (iv) Termination of Employment • Develop a written termination policy and/or progressive discipline policy. All supervisors should implement your process consistently. • If appropriate, conduct exit interviews or administer exit surveys. (v) Other • Conduct training for all employees of your EEO and anti- harassment policies in safety meetings at the beginning of each project and additionally throughout the year for new hires. Emphasize reporting procedures. • Make reasonable efforts to solicit people of color, Indigenous, and female-owned businesses to participate in subcontracts or vendor contracts. (c) Developer shall use good faith efforts to cause its general contractor to implement the equity and inclusion community engagement plan attached as Exhibit M, (the “Community Engagement Plan”) as may be modified with the Authority’s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Execution 24 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 4.10 Effect of Delay. Developer acknowledges that if construction of the Minimum Improvements is delayed due to Unavoidable Delays or for any other reason, this could affect the amount of Available Tax Increments and thus the total amount which may be available to pay the TIF Note. Developer acknowledges that if the Completion of the Minimum Improvements is delayed due to Unavoidable Delays or for any other reason, there will be no compensation to Developer or any other party for any reduction in the amount available to pay or refund the TIF Note. 4.11 Additional Responsibilities of Developer. Developer shall cause the Minimum Improvements to be constructed, operated and maintained in substantial accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Final Development Plans and Development Contract, and all applicable Law (including, without limitation, zoning, building code and public health laws and regulations). (a) Developer shall obtain, in a timely manner, all required permits, licenses, and approvals, and will meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable Law that must be obtained or met before the Minimum Improvements may be lawfully constructed. (b) Developer shall not construct any building or other structures on, over, or within the boundary lines of any public utility easement unless such construction is provided for in such easement, approved by the utility involved, or approved by the City if no utility is then utilizing the easement area. (c) Prior to delivery of a Certificate of Completion to Developer, upon the request of the Authority, Developer shall, after reasonable advance notice from the Authority, provide the Authority and the City with reasonable access to the Property to inspect the Minimum Improvements for compliance with this Agreement. (d) Prior to delivery of the Certificate of Completion, upon the request of the Authority from time to time, Developer shall deliver monthly progress reports to the Authority. The progress reports shall include: summary of progress to date, estimated percent construction completion, identification of any Unavoidable Delays, and projected occupancy date. (e) Developer shall comply with and cause its Related Parties, and pursuant to applicable third-party contracts, cause each of their respective contractors and subcontractors to comply with all applicable Law (including, without limitation, labor and wage laws). (f) Developer shall comply and use commercially reasonable efforts to cause its contractors to comply with all applicable Environmental Law as it relates to the Project Area and the Minimum Improvements. 4.12 Certificate of Completion. Developer may notify the Authority and request a Certificate of Completion in accordance with this section. Developer may request a Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements at any time after substantial completion of the Minimum Improvements and delivery of a Certificate of Occupancy. Within 30 days after receipt of such request, the Authority shall inspect the Minimum Improvements to determine if such Minimum Improvements have been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. An example of the Authority’s Completion checklist is included as part of the form of Certificate of Completion attached as Exhibit F. Following such inspection the Authority shall either furnish Developer with (a) an appropriate, recordable Certificate of Completion or (b) a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respects Developer has failed to complete the relevant portion of the Minimum Improvements and what measures or acts will be necessary, in the opinion of the Authority, for Developer to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. If the Authority issues a written statement in accordance with clause (b) above, Developer Execution 25 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 shall thereafter take such actions necessary to cure such deficiencies in the applicable Minimum Improvements. After such deficiencies have been cured, Developer shall notify the Authority and the Authority will re-inspect the applicable Minimum Improvements and take one of the actions described in clauses (a) and (b) hereof, and such process will continue until the Authority issues the applicable recordable Certificate of Completion. Issuance of a Certificate of Completion by the Authority shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in this Agreement with respect to the obligations of Developer to construct, or cause to be constructed, the Minimum Improvements. 4.13 Public Art. The Project shall include public art in a manner reasonably approved by the Authority. Such public art shall be a permanent sculpture or similar art installation. Developer shall at all times maintain the public art in good, first-class condition, at no cost to the City or the Authority. Article V Encumbrance of the Project Area 5.1 Mortgage of the Minimum Improvements Area. (a) Until the Completion of the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall not engage in any financing or any other transaction creating any mortgage or other security interest in or lien upon Project Area, or portion thereof, whether by express agreement or operation of law (a “Mortgage”), or suffer any Mortgage to be made on or attach to the Project Area except for the purpose of obtaining funds necessary for acquiring and constructing the Minimum Improvements and paying other costs of the Minimum Improvements whether or not set forth in the TIF Pro Forma. (b) This restriction on encumbrance shall terminate upon Completion of the Minimum Improvements. Developer or any successor in interest to the Minimum Improvements or portion thereof, may sell or engage in financing or any other transaction creating a mortgage or encumbrance or lien on the Minimum Improvements or portion thereof after the Certificate of Completion has been obtained with respect to the Minimum Improvements, without obtaining the prior written approval of the Authority. (c) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Developer is authorized, without the approval of the Authority, to obtain acquisition and construction financing to cover the costs of acquisition and construction of the Minimum Improvements and other costs of the Minimum Improvements whether or not set forth in the TIF Pro Forma and to mortgage the Project Area to provide security for acquisition and construction financing. 5.2 Copy of Notice of Default to Mortgagee. If the City or the Authority delivers any notice or demand to Developer with respect to any Default under this Agreement, the City or the Authority, as applicable, will use its reasonable efforts to also deliver a copy of such notice or demand to the mortgagee of any Mortgage at the address of such mortgagee provided in the recorded Mortgage or any other address thereafter provided to the Authority in a written notice from Developer or the mortgagee, provided that failure of the City or the Authority to give any such notice shall not limit the City’s or the Authority’s ability to exercise any of its remedies hereunder. 5.3 Mortgagee’s Option to Cure Events of Default. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the mortgagee under any Mortgage will have the right at its option, to cure or remedy such Event of Default within the cure periods set forth herein. 5.4 Rights of a Foreclosing Mortgagee. Except as provided in Section 5.6, an individual or entity who acquires title to all or a portion of the Minimum Improvements through the foreclosure of a Execution 26 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 mortgage or deed in lieu of foreclosure on such portion of the Project Area remains subject to each of the restrictions set forth in this Agreement and remains subject to all of the obligations of Developer, or any successor in interest to Developer, under the terms of this Agreement, but neither the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, the grantee under a deed in lieu of foreclosure, nor any subsequent transferee from a mortgagee shall have any personal liability for a breach of such obligations under this Agreement so long as: (a) The party acquiring title through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure observes all of the restrictions set forth in the Agreement; (b) The party who acquired title through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure does not undertake or permit any other party to undertake any Minimum Improvements on the portion of the Project Area it owns; (c) The City has no obligation to approve any plans for Minimum Improvements or a portion of the Minimum Improvements the foreclosing mortgagee (or mortgagee obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure) owns or to issue any related building permits. The purpose of this section is to permit a foreclosing lender (or mortgagee or purchaser obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure or a subsequent transferee) to hold title to the portion of the Project Area it acquires through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, subject to, but without personal liability for the obligations under this Agreement, until it can sell the portion it holds to a third party who will assume the obligations of Developer under the terms of this Agreement and proceed with the construction of the Minimum Improvements pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. If, rather than passively holding title to the portion of the Project Area it acquires through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, the foreclosing lender (or mortgagee obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure or subsequent transferee) or other purchaser at a foreclosure sale desires to construct the Minimum Improvements, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale must assume and perform each of the obligations of Developer, or the applicable successor to the interest of Developer, under this Agreement as to the portion of the Minimum Improvements subject to foreclosure. This section does not restrict the authority of the Authority to pursue its rights under any outstanding security, exercise remedies otherwise available under this Agreement or suspend the performance of the obligations of the Authority or Developer under this Agreement as otherwise allowed. The Authority agrees to reasonably cooperate with any foreclosing lender (or mortgagee obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure) or other purchaser at a foreclosure sale in pursuing the Minimum Improvements in accordance with this Agreement. Unless acting other than passively holding title as described above in this section, a lender or an independent third party that purchases at a foreclosure sale will have no liability for breach under this Agreement. 5.5 Events of Default Under Mortgage. Developer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an agreement from any mortgagee under a Mortgage that in the event Developer is in default under any Mortgage, the mortgagee will use commercially reasonable efforts, within 30 days after it becomes aware of any such default and prior to exercising any remedy available to it due to such default, to notify the Authority in writing of (i) the fact of default; (ii) the elements of default; and (iii) the actions required to cure the default. Developer shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an agreement in any such Mortgage, that if, within the time period required by the Mortgage, the Authority cures any default under the Mortgage, the mortgagee will pursue none of its remedies under the Mortgage based on such default, provided that failure of Developer to obtain such an agreement from any such mortgagee shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement. 5.6 Subordination of Agreement. The City and the Authority will, upon the request of the holder of a Mortgage, execute and record a subordination agreement pursuant to which the City and the Execution 27 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Authority agree that, upon a default by Developer under a Mortgage, the holder of the Mortgage may elect, in an instrument to be recorded in the Hennepin County land records and delivered to the City and the Authority before the commencement of proceedings to foreclose the Mortgage, to either (1) treat this Agreement as being subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage such that the foreclosure of the Mortgage and the failure to redeem from such foreclosure will extinguish and terminate this Agreement and the TIF Note will automatically be cancelled and rescinded; or (2) to treat this Agreement as having priority over the Mortgage in which case this Agreement and the TIF Note will survive the foreclosure of the Mortgage and this Agreement will be binding upon the holder of the Sheriff's Certificate issued in conjunction with the foreclosure of the Mortgage, subject to the terms and conditions of Section 5.4. If the holder of the Mortgage fails to notify the City and the Authority of its election under this Section 5.6 on or before the commencement of foreclosure proceedings, the holder of the Mortgage shall be deemed to have elected to treat this Agreement as being subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage such that the foreclosure of the Mortgage and the failure to redeem from such foreclosure will extinguish and terminate this Agreement and the TIF Note will automatically terminate. The City and Authority each further agree that if the holder of a Mortgage elects to treat this Agreement as having priority over the Mortgage, the City and Authority, upon the completion of the foreclosure without redemption, agree that the time for the completion of the Minimum Improvements is extended to a date 12 months following the expiration of all applicable redemption periods or such later date the City and Authority approve in writing. Article VI Insurance and Indemnification 6.1 Insurance. (a) Developer shall obtain and continuously maintain insurance on the Minimum Improvements and, from time to time at the request of the Authority, furnish proof to the Authority that the premiums for such insurance have been paid and the insurance is in effect. The insurance coverage described below is the minimum insurance coverage that Developer must obtain and continuously maintain, provided that Developer shall obtain the insurance described in clause (i) below with respect to the Minimum Improvements prior to the Commencement of construction thereof and is only obligated to maintain the insurance described in clause (i) until Developer receives a Certificate of Completion: (i) Builder’s risk insurance, written on the so-called “Builder’s Risk- Completed Value Basis,” in an amount equal to 100% of the insurable value of the Minimum Improvements at the date of Completion, and with coverage available in non- reporting form on the so-called “all risk” form of policy. (ii) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner’s/Contractor’s Policy naming the Authority, and the City as an additional insured, with limits against bodily injury and property damage of not less than $2,500,000 for each occurrence (to accomplish the above-required limits, an umbrella excess liability policy may be used), written on an occurrence basis. (iii) Workers compensation insurance, for employees of Developer if and to the extent required by Law. (b) All insurance required in this Article shall be obtained and continuously maintained by responsible insurance companies selected by Developer which are authorized under the laws of the State to assume the risks covered by such policies. If available on commercially reasonable terms, each policy must contain a provision that the insurer will not cancel nor modify the policy without giving Execution 28 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 written notice to the insured at least 30 days before the cancellation or modification becomes effective. Not less than 15 days prior to the expiration of any policy, Developer must renew the existing policy or replace the policy with another policy conforming to the provisions of this Article. In lieu of separate policies, Developer may maintain a single policy, blanket or umbrella policies, or a combination thereof, having the coverage required herein. 6.2 Indemnification. (a) Developer releases and covenants and agrees that the City Parties shall not be liable for and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City Parties against any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about, or resulting from any defect in the Minimum Improvements constructed by Developer, except to the extent attributable to the negligence or intentional misconduct of any City Party. (b) Except to the extent of the negligence or intentional misconduct of any City Party, Developer shall indemnify the City Parties, now and forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claims, demands, suits, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees), actions or other proceedings whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising from the actions or inactions of Developer, or any of its owners, agents, contractors, or employees, under this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and/or operation of the Minimum Improvements. Article VII Other Developer Covenants 7.1 Developer Reimbursement Obligations. Developer shall pay all reasonable out of pocket costs of the City and the Authority in connection with the Minimum Improvements, the TIF Assistance and the SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan provided to Developer, including, but not limited, the costs and expenses of the City Consultants, the costs of the development and negotiation of this Agreement and any amendments or modifications to this Agreement, fiscal analysis, legal fees, and all other costs and expenses related thereto. Sufficient monies must be provided to the Authority along with the request for TIF Assistance. These monies shall be held in escrow. Any unused monies shall be returned to Developer. These monies shall not bear interest. After the escrowed monies have been used, Developer shall pay such costs monthly upon presentation of invoices and other documentation of such costs, not more than 30 days after the request for payment is delivered to Developer. All such costs will be Qualified Redevelopment Costs pursuant to the TIF Pro Forma. 7.2 Maintenance and Operation of the Improvements. Developer shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, maintain and operate the Minimum Improvements in a safe and secure way and in compliance with this Agreement and applicable Law. Developer shall pay all of the reasonable and necessary expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Minimum Improvements, including all premiums for insurance insuring against loss or damage thereto and adequate insurance against liability for injury to persons or property arising from the construction of the Minimum Improvements as required pursuant to this Agreement. During construction of the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall not knowingly cause any person working in or attending the Minimum Improvements for any purpose, or any tenant of the Minimum Improvements, to be exposed to any hazardous or unsafe condition; provided that such party shall not be in Default hereunder if it has required the contractors employed to perform work on the Minimum Improvements to take such precautions as may be available to protect the persons in and around the Minimum Improvements from hazards arising from the work, and has further required each such contractor to obtain and maintain liability insurance protecting against liability to persons for injury Execution 29 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 arising from the work. The expenses of operation and maintenance of the Minimum Improvements shall be borne solely by Developer. 7.3 Cooperation with Litigation. Developer shall reasonably cooperate with the Authority with respect to any litigation commenced by third parties with respect to the Project Area and/or the Minimum Improvements; however, this provision does not obligate Developer to incur costs, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or elsewhere. 7.4 Condemnation, Damage, or Destruction. In the event that title to and possession of the Minimum Improvements or any material part thereof shall be taken in condemnation or by the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any governmental body or other person (except the Authority or the City) or the Minimum Improvements is damaged or destroyed, Developer shall, with reasonable promptness after such taking or casualty, notify the Authority as to the nature and extent of such damage or taking, as applicable. Upon receipt of any condemnation award or insurance proceeds Developer shall elect to either: (a) use the entire condemnation award or insurance proceeds to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements (or, in the event only a part of the Minimum Improvements has been taken or damaged, then to reconstruct such part) upon the remaining property to the extent necessary to maintain and continue operations of Minimum Improvements for its intended purpose; or (b) in the event that the condemnation affects or taking or damage or destruction affects the Project Area but not the Minimum Improvements thereon, retain, for the account of Developer, all of the condemnation award or insurance proceeds. 7.5 Business Subsidy Agreement. The Authority and Developer have determined that a business subsidy agreement within the meaning of the Minnesota Business Subsidy Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995 is not required in accordance with the exception contained in the Minnesota Business Subsidy Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.993, subd. 3(17), because Developer’s investment in the purchase of the Minimum Improvements Area and site preparation thereon is 70% or more of the assessor’s current year’s estimated market value for the Minimum Improvements Area. 7.6 Developer/Authority Grant Applications. Developer and the Authority will cooperate in efforts to obtain available public grant funding to undertake the Minimum Improvements, including but not limited to grants from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF), Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD), Met Council Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA), Met Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA), DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant, DEED Redevelopment Grant, and any other funding from metropolitan, state, county, and federal sources identified by the Authority or Developer as reasonably available. Costs of preparing the grant applications and preparing required reports shall be borne by Developer. City staff shall have the final authority to review and submit the grant applications to the applicable agency. To the extent additional grant funds not reflected in the TIF Pro Forma are obtained, any such amounts shall be taken into consideration by the Authority when the Authority reviews the updated TIF Pro Formas and other information under Article III prior to issuing the TIF Note. Developer shall reasonably cooperate with the City and the Authority with respect to the administration of any grants received from Hennepin County, Metropolitan Council, or State of Minnesota to support the construction of the Minimum Improvements. 7.7 Mitigation of Construction Disruption. Developer shall comply with directions set and regulations enforced by the City Engineering and Building Inspection Departments regarding on site construction activities pursuant to the Development Contract, including hours for construction work on the Minimum Improvements and deliveries to and from the jobsite. Heavy trucks must follow routes established by the City. Developer shall make best efforts to mitigate construction disruption to surrounding properties. Execution 30 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 7.8 Project Information. (a) Project Ownership. Developer shall provide the City and Authority with the final organizational structure for the ownership of the Project Area and the Minimum Improvements, and the identity of all parties with a Beneficial Interest as required to be disclosed in the Financing Commitments. Developer shall confirm such organizational and ownership information at the time Developer submits the Go-Ahead Letter, and periodically thereafter in accordance with clause (b) below. Prior to delivery of information regarding firm financing commitment or delivery of a Go Ahead Letter, Developer will provide additional financing updates as requested by the Authority, whether by oral or written request, within a reasonable period of time. (b) Other Information. In addition to the other Project information required to be provided by Developer hereunder, Developer shall provide or make available for review at Developer’s offices to the City and/or Authority such information regarding Developer and the Minimum Improvements as the City and/or Authority may reasonably request in writing from time to time in order for the City and Authority to monitor Developer’s progress on the Minimum Improvements and/or the status of Developer’s obligations hereunder, including without limitation the status of Minimum Improvements ownership, organizational structure, financing, leasing, and sales, no more frequently than monthly, but otherwise promptly upon request in writing and in no event later than five business days following such request. The City and Authority will treat all such information which Developer includes a caption stating that the same is proprietary or trade secret information as nonpublic data under and in accordance with the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13. 7.9 Project Naming. Developer acknowledges that the City has an interest in the name of the adjacent Fred Richards park and agrees not to utilize the park name, or any derivation thereof, in the name of the Project whether for internal or external purposes. Article VIII Transfer Limitations 8.1 Representation as to the Minimum Improvements. Developer represents to the City and the Authority that its undertakings under this Agreement are for the purpose of developing the Minimum Improvements and not for the purpose of speculation in land holding. Developer acknowledges that, in view of the importance of the Minimum Improvements to the general welfare of the City and the Authority, and the substantial financing and other public aids that have been made available by the City and the Authority for the purpose of making such Minimum Improvements possible, the qualifications and identity of Developer are of particular concern to the Authority. Developer further acknowledges that the City and the Authority are willing to enter into this Agreement with Developer because of the qualifications and identity of Developer. 8.2 Limitation on Transfers. (a) Until the Authority’s issuance of the Certificate of Completion, Developer shall not sell, assign, convey, lease or transfer in any other mode or manner any of its right, title, and interest in and to this Agreement, all or any part of the Project Area, or the Minimum Improvements, without the express written approval of the Authority, provided that the consent of the Authority shall not be required for any of the following: (i) granting of a mortgage or other security interests in the Project Area and/or the Minimum Improvements as provided in Article V hereof; Execution 31 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 (ii) collaterally assigning Developer’s rights and obligations under this Agreement and the TIF Note to the holder of any Mortgage that is permitted under the terms of Section 5.1; (iii) leasing the Minimum Improvements in the normal course of business in a manner consistent with this Agreement and the City Approvals; or (iv) assigning this Agreement (in full, but not in part) to a Related Party of Developer; provided (1) such permitted assignee party executes an agreement in a form reasonably approved by the Authority pursuant to which such permitted assignee party, as applicable, assumes and agrees to perform the obligations of Developer under this Agreement, and (2) Developer provides the Authority with such information and documentation required by the Authority to confirm the completion of such transfer and that the such transfer meets the requirements of this subsection. (b) If the Authority’s consent to a transfer of the TIF Note or this Agreement, pursuant to Section 3.4 and/or Section 8.2, as applicable, is required, then the Authority shall be entitled to require, as conditions to its approval of any sale, assignment, conveyance, use or transfer of any rights, title, and interest in and to this Agreement, the TIF Note, the Project Area or the Minimum Improvements that: (i) Any proposed transferee shall not be exempt from the payment of real estate taxes and shall have the qualifications and financial responsibility, as determined by the Authority, necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Agreement by Developer; (ii) Any proposed transferee, by instrument in writing satisfactory to the Authority and in form recordable among the land records shall, for itself and its successors and assigns, and expressly for the benefit of the Authority have expressly assumed all of the obligations of Developer (or such obligations of Developer as are applicable to the portion of the Minimum Improvements acquired) under this Agreement and agree to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which Developer is subject; (iii) Developer must submit all instruments and other legal documents involved in effecting transfer to the Authority; and (iv) Developer and the transferee must comply with such other reasonable conditions as the Authority may find desirable in order to achieve and safeguard the purposes of the TIF Act, the Authority, this Agreement, and/or the Minimum Improvements; and (v) The transferee must demonstrate, in a manner satisfactory to the Authority, its ability to perform all assumed obligations in this Agreement. (c) In the absence of specific written agreement by the City and the Authority to the contrary, neither the transfer of the Minimum Improvements, or any portion thereof, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements or the City’s or the Authority’s consent to such a transfer will relieve Developer of its obligations under this Agreement. Execution 32 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Article IX Events of Default and Remedies 9.1 Events of Default Defined. “Events of Default” under this Agreement include any one or more of the events listed in Sections 9.2 and 9.3. 9.2 Developer Events of Default. The following shall be Events of Default for Developer: (a) subject to Unavoidable Delays and Cure Rights, Developer’s failure to achieve Commencement and Completion of any aspect of the Minimum Improvements by the applicable “Default Date” set forth in Section 4.1; (b) subject to Unavoidable Delays and Cure Rights, Developer shall Default in its obligations with respect to the construction of the Minimum Improvements (including the date for completion of the various ‘Descriptions of Work’ on or before the Default Dates set forth in Section 4.1(a)), or shall abandon or substantially suspend construction work on the Minimum Improvements, and any such Default, violation, abandonment or suspension is not cured, ended or remedied within 30 days after written notice to do so; (c) there is, in violation of this Agreement, any conveyance or other transfer of Project Area and/or the Minimum Improvements or any part thereof, and such violation is not cured within 30 days after written notice to do so; (d) subject to Unavoidable Delay and Cure Rights, failure by Developer to observe or perform any other covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement or, any of the City Easements, the Housing Restrictive Covenant or the City Approvals, and the continuation of such failure for a period of 30 days after written notice of such failure from any party hereto; (e) if, prior to the delivery of the Certificate of Completion, Developer shall (i) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended or under any similar federal or State law; or (ii) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (iii) become insolvent or adjudicated a bankrupt; or if a petition or answer proposing the adjudication of Developer, as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any present or future Federal bankruptcy act or any similar Federal or State law shall be filed in any court and such petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within 90 days after the filing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of Developer, or of the Minimum Improvements, or part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought against Developer, and shall not be discharged within 90 days after such appointed, or if Developer shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment. 9.3 City and Authority Events of Default. Subject to Cure Rights and events beyond the City’s and/or the Authority’s control, the failure of the City or the Authority to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement, and the continuation of such failure for a period of 30 days after written notice of such failure from any party hereto shall be an Event of Default for the City or the Authority. 9.4 Cure Rights. If a Default occurs under this Agreement which reasonably requires more than 30 days to cure, such Default shall not constitute an Event of Default (including any default under any of the City Easements, the Housing Restrictive Covenant or the City Approvals, notwithstanding shorter cure periods therein), provided that the curing of the Default is promptly commenced upon receipt Execution 33 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 by the defaulting party of the written notice of the Default, and with due diligence is thereafter continuously prosecuted to completion and is completed within a reasonable period of time, and provided that the defaulting party keeps the non-defaulting party informed at all times of its progress in curing the Default; provided, however in no event shall such additional cure period for any Default extend beyond 90 days. 9.5 Authority Remedies on Developer Events of Default. Whenever any Event of Default occurs by Developer, the Authority, subject to Cure Rights, may take any one or more of the following actions: (a) terminate this Agreement , except that the Authority shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement as a result of a default under Section 7.2 ; (b) suspend interest accrual and/or withhold payments due under the TIF Note until Developer has cured any Default which gave rise to such Event of Default; (c) suspend performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from Developer or the holder of any Mortgage, deemed adequate by the Authority, that Developer or the holder of any Mortgage will cure the Event of Default and continue its performance under this Agreement, (d) withhold the Certificate of Completion where such Event of Default relates to Completion of the Minimum Improvements or the issuance of the Certificate of Completion; (e) take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to the Authority to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Developer under this Agreement; and (f) the Authority shall have all remedies available at law and in equity to enforce performance of this Agreement including a right to specific performance. 9.6 City Remedies on Developer Events of Default. Whenever any Event of Default of Developer occurs, the City may suspend performance of its obligations under this Agreement and take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to the City to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Developer under this Agreement, including an action for specific performance. 9.7 Developer Remedies on City or Authority Events of Default. Whenever any Event of Default of the City or the Authority occurs, Developer, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the City or the Authority under this Agreement, including, without limitation, an action for specific performance. 9.8 No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the City, the Authority or Developer is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies unless otherwise expressly stated, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any Default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the Authority, the City or Developer to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than such notice as may be required in this Article IX. Execution 34 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 9.9 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. If any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. 9.10 Reimbursement of Attorneys’ Fees. Whenever a Default occurs and the non-defaulting party shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due or for the enforcement of performance or observance of any obligation or agreement under this Agreement, the defaulting party shall, within 10 days of written demand by the non-defaulting party pay to such non- defaulting party the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by the non- defaulting party. In the event of any enforcement action hereunder following a Default, the prevailing party, in addition to other relief, shall be entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs. The City, Authority and Developer waive their right to a jury trial on the issues of who is the prevailing party and the reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded to the prevailing party. Those issues will be decided by the trial judge upon motion by one or both parties, such motion to be decided based on the record as of the end of the jury trial augmented only by the testimony and/or affidavits from the attorneys and their staff. The parties agree that, subject to the trial judge’s discretion, the intent of this clause is to have all issues related to the award of attorneys’ fees and costs decided by the trial judge as quickly as practicable. Article X Additional Provisions 10.1 Conflicts of Interest. No member of the Board or other official of the Authority shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the TIF District or the Minimum Improvements, or any contract, agreement or other transaction contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder or with respect thereto, nor shall any such member of the governing body or other official participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member, official or employee of the City or the Authority shall be personally liable to the City or the Authority in the event of any Default or breach by Developer of any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. 10.2 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles and Sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. 10.3 Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by reputable overnight courier, sent registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, and addressed to: Developer at: c/o Solhem Development, LLC Attn: Curt Gunsbury 724 N First Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 with a copy to: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Execution 35 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 The Authority at: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 The City at: City of Edina Attention: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this section. 10.4 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury. All matters, whether sounding in tort or in contract, relating to the validity, construction, performance, or enforcement of this Agreement shall be controlled by, interpreted and determined in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota without regard to its conflict and choice of law provisions. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be venued exclusively in Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, state of Minnesota and shall not be removed therefrom to any other federal or state court. The Authority and Developer hereby consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in the foregoing court. The Authority and Developer hereby waive trial by jury for any litigation arising out of this Agreement. 10.5 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable under applicable Law, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term or provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law. 10.6 Consents and Approvals. Whenever the terms “consent,” “approve,” or “approval” are used herein, they shall mean consent or approvals which shall not be unreasonably conditioned or delayed, unless specifically provided otherwise. All consents or approvals must be delivered in writing in order to be effective. 10.7 Additional Documents. When reasonably requested to do so by another party, each party shall execute or cause to be executed any further documents as may be reasonably necessary or expedient and within their lawful obligation in order to consummate the transactions provided for in, and to carry out the purpose and intent of, this Agreement. 10.8 Limitation. All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the Authority or Developer contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the Authority and Developer, and not of any governing body Execution 36 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 member, officer, agent, servant, manager or employee of the Authority or Developer in the individual capacity thereof. 10.9 City/Authority Approval. Unless the City Council or the Board, as applicable, determines otherwise in its discretion, all approvals and other actions required of or taken by the Authority or the City shall be effective upon action by the Authorized Representative of the Authority or City, as applicable (or in either case his/her designee), unless (a) this Agreement explicitly provides for approval by the City Council or the Board of the Authority, (b) approval by the Council or Board is required by law or (c) the approval, in the opinion of the City Manager or the Executive Director, would result in a material change in the terms of this Agreement. 10.10 Superseding Effect. This Agreement reflects the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the items covered by this Agreement, and supersedes in all respects all prior agreements of the parties, whether written or otherwise, with respect to the items covered by this Agreement. 10.11 Relationship of Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed, to create a partnership or joint venture among or between the parties hereto, and the rights and remedies of the parties hereto shall be strictly as set forth in this Agreement. 10.12 Survival of Terms. The following Sections will survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement: Section 6.1 [Insurance]; Section 6.2 [Indemnification]; Section 7.1 [Developer Reimbursement Obligations]; Sections 9.5 through 9.10 [Remedies on Default, etc.] to the extent of any Event of Default arising prior to such termination or expiration; Section 10.3 [Notices and Demands]; Section 10.4 [Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury]; Section 10.14 [No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability]; and Section 10.17 [Limited Liability]. 10.13 Data Practices Act. Developer acknowledges that all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Developer with regard to the performance of its duties under this Agreement are subject to the requirements of Chapter 13, Minnesota Statutes. 10.14 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way affect or impair the City’s or Authority’s immunity or the immunity of the City’s and Authority’s employees, consultants and contractors, whether on account of official immunity, legislative immunity, statutory immunity, discretionary immunity or otherwise. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way affect or impair the limitations on the City’s or Authority’s liability or the liability of the City’s and Authority’s employees, consultants and independent contractors. By entering into this Agreement, the Authority does not waive any rights, protections, or limitations as provided under law and equity for the Authority, or of their respective employees, consultants and contractors. 10.15 City and Authority Regulatory Authority. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or modify the City’s or Authority’s regulatory authority. 10.16 Memorandum of Agreement. Neither party shall cause this Agreement to be recorded or filed in the real estate records of the County. However, Developer shall cause a memorandum of this Agreement to be so recorded or filed in the form attached as Exhibit G, and hereby incorporated herein by reference upon execution of this Agreement upon that portion of the Project Area owned by Developer. At the time of execution of this Agreement the parties hereto will also execute and acknowledge the Memorandum of Agreement. 10.17 Limited Liability. Notwithstanding anything to contrary provided in this Agreement, it is specifically understood and agreed, such agreement being the primary consideration for the execution of Execution 37 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 this Agreement by Developer, that (a) there should be absolutely no personal liability on the part of any director, officer, manager, member, employee or agent of Developer or the City or Authority with respect to any terms, covenants and conditions in this Agreement; (b) Developer and the Authority waive all claims, demands and causes of action against the other parties’ directors, officers, managers, members, employees and agents in any Event of Default, by either party, as the case may be, of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement to be performed by either party; and (c) Developer and the Authority, as the case may be, shall look solely to the assets of the other party for the satisfaction of each and every applicable remedy in the Event of Default by any party, as the case may be, of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement such exculpation of liability to be absolute and without any exception whatsoever. 10.18 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and every term and condition hereof; provided, however, that if any date herein set forth for the performance of any obligations by Developer or the Authority or for the delivery of any instrument or notice as herein provided should not be on a business day, the compliance with such obligations or delivery shall be deemed acceptable on the next following business day. 10.19 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 10.20 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be amended unless in writing and executed by the parties hereto. Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any necessary consent to an amendment to this Agreement from the Construction Lender or Permanent Lender, as applicable. 10.21 TIF District. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Authority and the City may take appropriate steps to modify the TIF District in the future, including, without limitation, incorporating additional land into the TIF District. Developer shall cooperate with the Authority and the City with any such future modification, including to execute and deliver any supplements or modifications to this Agreement that are reasonably required in connection therewith, provided that no such modification or supplement shall (a) increase any obligation of Developer hereunder or (b) adversely affect any right of or benefit of Developer hereunder. 10.22 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be effective from the Effective Date above written until the earlier of (a) the date this Agreement is terminated pursuant to the terms and conditions hereof, (b) payment in full of the TIF Note, or (c) the date of termination of the TIF District. Upon termination, the parties agree to execute and record a document terminating this Agreement and providing for the release of the obligations under this Agreement. 10.23 Estoppel Certificate. Each party, respectively, agrees that at any time and from time to time within 10 business days after receipt of a written request by the other party, to execute, acknowledge and deliver to such party a statement in writing and in such form as will enable it to be recorded in the proper office for the recordation of deeds and other instruments certifying: (a) that this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect or, if there have been modifications, that the same are in full force and effect as modified and identifying the modifications; (b) that no party is in default under any provisions of this Agreement or, if there has been a default, the nature of such default; (c) that all work to be performed, under this Agreement or any related agreement has been performed or, if not so performed, specifying the work to be performed; and (d) as to any other matter that the requesting party, a prospective purchaser or assignee or a prospective mortgagee or other lender shall reasonably request. It is intended that any such statement may be relied upon by any person, prospective mortgagee of, or assignee of any mortgage, upon such interest. Any such statement on behalf of the City may be executed by the City Manager without City Execution 38 Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) 4853-6591-5695\11 Council approval and any such statement on behalf of the Authority may be executed by the Executive Director without Authority Board approval. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] Execution [Signature Page to Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street] 4853-6591-5695\11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. City of Edina, Minnesota By: _________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: _________________________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of __________, 2022, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. ______________________________________ Notary Public Execution [Signature Page to Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street] 4853-6591-5695\11 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ James Pierce, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of __________, 2022, by James B. Hovland and James Pierce, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. ______________________________________ Notary Public Execution [Signature Page to Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street] 4853-6591-5695\11 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: __________________________________________ STATE OF _______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2022, by ____________________, the _______________ of 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public A-1 4893-8005-0493\1 Exhibit A Legal Description That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said Tract B, a distance of 286.31 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 12 minutes 31 seconds East 473.90 feet to the south line of said Tract B and said line there terminating. B-1 4885-9152-1341\1 Exhibit B Project Site Plan 020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD^,d/Ey͗ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂ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y,//dͲWZK:dW>E^ :(7/$1'7<3(3(0%:(70($'2:$&'(/,1($7('6ƒ :$3$570(176:7+67(',1$011),5676768,7(0,11($32/,60162/+(0&203$1,(6352-(&735(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,21,668(68%0,77$/6800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21352-(&7180%(5  &21&(376(7 ),1$/5(=21,1*$33/,&$7,21 3/$11,1*&200,66,21$33/,&$7,21'5$:1%<5(9,(:('%<5/-/ 5/&23<5,*+7&,9,/6,7(*5283,1&FFLYLOVLWHJURXSFRP5(9,6,216800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21&7,7/(6+((7$3$570(176(',1$0,11(627$6+((7,1'(;6+((7180%(5 6+((77,7/(& 7,7/(6+((76,7(/2&$7,216,7(/2&$7,210$31,668(')25),1$/5(=21,1*$33/,&$7,21'(9(/23(53523(57<2:1(5(1*,1((5/$1'6&$3($5&+,7(&7&,9,/6,7(*5283*/(1:22'$9(*2/'(19$//(<01&217$&752%%,(/$77$6859(<25*(27(&+1,&$/(1*,1((5& 29(5$//6,7(3/$1Know what's57%'/5(6,'(17,$//$1'6&$3(3/$1$5&+,7(&7020(1780'(6,*1*5283135,25$9(1$673$8/01&217$&7&5$,*+$570$1&5$,*#0'*$5&+,7(&76&2062/+(0&203$1,(61),5676768,7(0,11($32/,601&217$&7&857*816%85<&857#62/+(0&2029(5$//*5$',1*3/$1&29(5$//87,/,7<3/$1&7+()5('&6*352-(&73+$6(,,5(6,'(17,$/38%/,&675((7(;,67,1*%8,/',1*6725(0$,1681'(/$1'6859(<,1*($67%/220,1*721)5((:$< ,: 68,7(%/220,1*72101&217$&7/(21$5'&$5/621 81'(5*5281'($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&12WK6WUHHW:([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJ([LVW3,'3,'2ZQHU3HQ3,'2ZQHU&LW\RI(GLQD6ƒ :6WDLUV%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH6WDLUV(DVW/LQH7UDFW%'HOLQHDWHG:HWODQG&RUQHUVIDOOLQZDWHU1R0RQXPHQWV)RXQGRU6HW(GJHRI:DWHU$3$570(176:7+67(',1$011),5676768,7(0,11($32/,60162/+(0&203$1,(6352-(&735(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,21,668(68%0,77$/6800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21352-(&7180%(5  &21&(376(7 ),1$/5(=21,1*$33/,&$7,21 3/$11,1*&200,66,21$33/,&$7,21'5$:1%<5(9,(:('%<5/-/ 5/&23<5,*+7&,9,/6,7(*5283,1&FFLYLOVLWHJURXSFRP5(9,6,216800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21&6,7(3/$16,7(3/$1/(*(1'1Know what's5 :(7/$1'7<3(3(0%:(70($'2:$&'(/,1($7('5'2&81'(5*5281'($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&12WK6WUHHW:([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJWK6WUHHW:([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJ3,'3,'2ZQHU3HQWDJRQ1RUWK//&3,'2ZQHU&LW\RI(GLQD3DUNODZQ$YH3,'2ZQHU9LORI(GLQD8QDVVLJQHG$GGUHVV6ƒ :6WDLUV%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFHFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH6WDLUV(DVW/LQH7UDFW%'HOLQHDWHG:HWODQG'HOLQHDWHG:HWODQG&RUQHUVIDOOLQZDWHU1R0RQXPHQWV)RXQGRU6HW(GJHRI:DWHU$3$570(176:7+67(',1$011),5676768,7(0,11($32/,60162/+(0&203$1,(6352-(&735(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,21,668(68%0,77$/6800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21352-(&7180%(5  &21&(376(7 ),1$/5(=21,1*$33/,&$7,21 3/$11,1*&200,66,21$33/,&$7,21'5$:1%<5(9,(:('%<5/-/ 5/&23<5,*+7&,9,/6,7(*5283,1&FFLYLOVLWHJURXSFRP5(9,6,216800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21&29(5$//*5$',1*3/$1'EZ>'Z/E'EKd^͗*5$',1*3/$1/(*(1'*5281':$7(5,1)250$7,21&,7<2)(',1$*5$',1*127(66:6:(526,21&21752/127(61Know what's5(2)  :(7/$1'7<3(3(0%:(70($'2:$&'(/,1($7(''2&81'(5*5281'($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&12WK6WUHHW:([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJWK6WUHHW:([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJ3,'3,'2ZQHU3HQWDJRQ1RUWK//&3,'2ZQHU&LW\RI(GLQD3DUNODZQ$YH3,'2ZQHU9LORI(GLQD8QDVVLJQHG$GGUHVV6ƒ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FLYLOVLWHJURXSFRP5(9,6,216800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21&29(5$//87,/,7<3/$1'EZ>hd/>/dzEKd^͗87,/,7</(*(1'&,7<2)(',1$87,/,7<127(61Know what's5 81'(5*5281'($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&1287,/,7<($6(0(173(5'2&12WK6WUHHW:([LVWLQJ%XLOGLQJ3,'2ZQHU&LW\RI(GLQD6ƒ :6WDLUV%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH%LWXPLQRXV6XUIDFH6WDLUV(DVW/LQH7UDFW%1R0RQX)RXQGRU5(9,6,216800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21/5(6,'(17,$//$1'6&$3(3/$1$3$570(176:7+67(',1$011),5676768,7(0,11($32/,60162/+(0&203$1,(6352-(&735(/,0,1$5<127)25&216758&7,21,668(68%0,77$/6800$5<'$7('(6&5,37,21352-(&7180%(5  &21&(376(7 ),1$/5(=21,1*$33/,&$7,21 3/$11,1*&200,66,21$33/,&$7,21'5$:1%<5(9,(:('%<5/-/ 5/&23<5,*+7&,9,/6,7(*5283,1&FFLYLOVLWHJURXSFRP1Know what's5352326('3(5(11,$/3/$176<0%2/66((3/$176&+('8/($1'3/$1)2563(&,(6$1'3/$17,1*6,=(6352326(''(&,'8286$1'(9(5*5((16+58%6<0%2/66((3/$176&+('8/($1'3/$1)2563(&,(6$1'3/$17,1*6,=(6352326('251$0(17$/75((6<0%2/66((3/$176&+('8/($1'3/$1)2563(&,(6$1'3/$17,1*6,=(6352326('(9(5*5((175((6<0%2/66((3/$176&+('8/($1'3/$1)2563(&,(6$1'3/$17,1*6,=(6352326('&$123<75((6<0%2/66((3/$176&+('8/($1'3/$1)2563(&,(6$1'3/$17,1*6,=(6('*,1*'(&25$7,9(%28/'(56 5281'(' %/2&.67</( ',$>E^WEKd^͗ 020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX01.1(;7(5,253(563(&7,9(([WHULRU3HUVSHFWLYH 020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX01.2675((79,(:3(563(&7,9(63DUN3HGHVWULDQ$FFHVV3DUN9HKLFXODU$FFHVV,OOXVWUDWLYH&RQFHSW'HVLJQ7%'LQ&ROODERUDWLRQZLWK&LW\5HYLHZDQG$SSURYHGE\$OO3DUWLHV,OOXVWUDWLYH&RQFHSW'HVLJQ7%'LQ&ROODERUDWLRQZLWK&LW\5HYLHZDQG$SSURYHGE\$OO3DUWLHV N020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX02(;,67,1*&217(;79,(:9,(:9,(:9,(:9,(:9,(:9,(:9,(:9,(:/(*(1')LQDO6LWH3ODQ5HYLHZ ::::758666$16)$//6,1:$7(50$7&+/,1($75$&7&75$&7:03/(9*(9*$&.$6+63&*63&*63&*63&*03/03/63&*63&*63&*$5%&5$%&5$%&5$%03/03/&276$16$1ƒ ƒ (/,1(2)75$&7%ƒ81'(5*5281'3(5'2&126ƒ (:22')(1&()7&+$,1/,1.)(1&(6721(:$//&21&5(7(67$,5:(//7((//%,780,1286&21&5(7(&21&7<3,&$/6(('(7$,/7<3,&$/6(('(7$,7<3,&$/6(('(7$,/29(5+$1*0(7$*/$67<3,&(175</(9(/35(&$6&21&5(7(2)),%8,/',1*:7+675%8,/',1*)22735“64)7(175<(175</(9(/35(&$67&21&5(7(2)),&(%8,/',1*:7+675((7%8,/',1*)22735,17 “64)77<3,&$/6(('(7$,/&,3:&,3:::*$6*$6*$6$%$1*$6$%$1*$66$166$16 &/$<6$166$168*& 3 8*( 3 8*( 3 8*( 3 8*( 3 8*( 3 8*( 3 [[[[&2/&2/+&6+&6+&67&67&6:970+(0+/3/(0+'**0$&+<'$&*3*3*3*3*38383 6)CAFE6)COMMON AREAENTEREXITGARAGE$3352;,0$7((1'2)),5($&&(6652$'213+$6(,/2&$7,212)3$667+528*+$%29(67(3683723/$=$$%29(ONE WAYWEST 77TH STREET75$16)250(5ENTRANCE  COVERED ACTIVITY AREA6)COMMON AREA7:2:$<EXISTING BUILDINGEXISTING BUILDING EXISTING PARKING LOT (EAST)EXISTING PARKING LOT,1'225322/ ONE WAY EXISTING BUILDING (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)ENTRANCE%8,/',1*6(7%$&.%8,/',1*6(7%$&.%8,/',1*6(7%$&.DOG PARKPATIOPATIOWOONERF PEDESTRIAN PLAZANEW PUBLIC STREET VEHICULAR CONNECTIONNPEDESTRIAN PARK ACCESS3$9(56BICYCLE PARK ACCESSBIKE SHOP%2&&(&285767(3683723/$=$$%29(VEHICULAR PARK ACCESSNEW ACCESS DRIVE(TWO WAY)PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PARKING LOT (NORTH) 5(675,3('7267$//6 02180(176,*1$&&(6672),5(/$1(63(('7$%/($7&5266:$/. 75$)),&&$/0,1* 67236,*16$7,17(56(&7,21 75$)),&&$/0,1* 75$6+$5($ 5(675,3('7267$//6 FDCELECTRICALWATER*5$9(/%8))(5$5281'),5(/$1(3$9(5602180(176,*1020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX036,7(3/$1),567)/225DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY:LOT INFORMATION:7+675((7:(67 3,1 ZONING:(;7(1'('38')5203+$6(,PROPOSED USE:08/7,)$0,/<0,;('86(APPROXIMATE LOT AREA:6) $&5(6 29(5$//HEIGHT:6725,(6  SETBACKS 35(6&5,%(' :)5217<$5' )76,'(<$5' )75($5<$5' )7GROSS BUILDING AREA BY FLOOR67)/225 6)1')/225 6)5')/225 6)7+)/225 6)7+)/225 6)7+)/225 6)7+)/225 6)727$/ 6)GARAGE PARKING67)/225&203$&7 67$1'$5' 1')/225&203$&7 67$1'$5' 727$/3$5.,1* UNIT COUNT (APPROXIMATE)5')/225%(' %(''(1 %(' $))%(' $))%(' 7+)/225%(' %(''(1 %(' $))%(' $))%(' 7+)/225%(' %(''(1 %(' $))%(' $))%(' 7+)/225%(' %(''(1 %(' %(''(1 $))%(' $))%(' 7+)/225%(' %(''(1 %(' %(''(1 $))%(' 727$/ F.A.R. SITE AREA 136,368 SF (3.13 ACRES)*5266$5($(;&/8',1**$5$*(6 )$56)   SITE / FIRST FLOOR PLAN)LQDO6LWH3ODQ5HYLHZ &$)(%(/2: 23(1 GARAGE6)COMMON AREA&20021$5($%(/2: 23(1 6)COMMON AREA'123(172%(/2:(*5(66&2857(*5(66&2857522)%(/2:522)%(/2:522)%(/2:B10-IZD4C10D1C1C1C1B2B2B2D2D3B3D9-IZ D10B10-IZC2C2B4B4C2C2B3D10B10-IZD5C8D6B3B3D6D9-IZD5C3B7B7C4C4C5C11B8D8B9D7B10-IZD7B9D8B8B8C5C4C4B7B7C3B5C8B4C1NB9B9B8C11B7B7 C4C4C5C5C4C4 B7B7B8B8B3 B3B10-IZD9-IZB4B3B3B2 B2 B2 C1 C1C10B10-IZC1B5B10-IZB10-IZC2C2 C2C2C3C8C3D4D1D2D3D9-IZ D10B4D10D5 D5D6D6D7D8D7 D8B4C1C8522)%(/2:522)%(/2:522)'(&.D12D6 D6D12C8D5B10-IZD10C7B4B4B3B10-IZC2C2 C2C2D4B10-IZD10C7B3D3D2 B2 B2 B2 C1 C1 C1D1C10D5 B5B10-IZF3C8C1B4C10C1C1B2B2B3B10-IZB3B4B4B7B7C11B8C5C4C4 C4C4C5B8B8B7B7B9B9B3 B3B10-IZB5B10-IZB10-IZC1C2C2 C2C2C3C8C3D8 D7D7 D8D5D9-IZD10D5D6D6D2D3D9-IZ D10D4D1C8B2 C1B4D1D4C10C1C1C1B2B2B2D2D3B3 D9-IZ D10B10-IZB10-IZC2C2B4B4C2C2B3D9-IZ D10B10-IZB5D5D5C8C3D6D6C3B7B7C4C4D11B8C9B10-IZF2 F1F1 F2D11C4C4B7B7C11C952207<3(/(*(1'%('%(''(1%('%(''(1$))%('$))%('&,5&8/$7,2181,76725$*(9(57,&$/&,5&8/$7,21F3C8B4C1020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX04)/2253/$16  2ND FLOOR PLAN  3RD FLOOR PLAN  4TH FLOOR PLAN  7TH FLOOR PLAN  5TH FLOOR PLAN  6TH FLOOR PLAN)LQDO6LWH3ODQ5HYLHZ 67)/225 833(5522) 1')/225 5')/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 *$5$*((175<$/80,1806725()521767$1',1*6($00(7$/$:1,1*$/80,180%$/&21<9,1</:,1'2:6*/$66 $/80,180*8$5'5$,/9,1</6/,',1*'2250(7$/3$5$3(7&$3$1*/('7,0%(53(5*2/$67$,5725')/2257+2528*+)$5(0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/&21&5(7(&2/8016$1*/('7,0%(53(5*2/$67)/225 833(5522) 1')/225 5')/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 $/80,180%$/&21<:*/$66 $/80,180*8$5'5$,/69,1</:,1'2:69,1</6/,',1*'225*/$66 $/80,180*8$5'5$,/&21&5(7(&2/8010$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/$1*/('7,0%(53(5*2/$67)/225 833(5522) 1')/225 5')/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 $/80,180%$/&21<9,1</:,1'2:69,1</6/,',1*'2250$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/67$1',1*6($00(7$/$:1,1*$/80,1806725()5217 %,.(6725$*((175<0$7(5,$/$1*/('7,0%(53(5*2/$$/80,1806725()5217$/80,1806725()5217 0$,1%8,/',1*(175<0$7(5,$/67)/225 833(5522) 1')/225 5')/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/$/80,180 */$66*8$5'5$,/67$,5725')/2257+2528*+)$5(9,1</:,1'2:6$/80,180%$/&21<67$,5$&&(669,1</6/,',1*'22575$16)250(53/$17(5%2;(60$7(5,$/EXTERIOR FINISH KEYMATERIAL #1:%$6,62)'(6,*13$77(51&2/257,17('35(&$67:$//3$1(/+$1'+(:1+(0/2&.%52:1MATERIAL #2:%$6,62)'(6,*167</(&2/25%5,&.0$6215<87,/,7<5811,1*%21'&+$5&2$/MATERIAL #3:%$6,62)'(6,*167</(&2/250(7$/3$1(/)/86+5(9($/:$50*5$<25,(17$7,21 9(57,&$/MATERIAL #4:%$6,62)'(6,*167</(&2/25/$36,',1*(;32685(/,*+7*5$<60227+25,(17$7,21 +25,=217$/67)/225 833(5522) 1')/225 5')/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 $/80,180%$/&21<9,1</:,1'2:69,1</6/,',1*'2250(7$/3$5$3(7&$3$1*/('7,0%(53(5*2/$0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/5')/225(;7(5,25&211(&7,2167)/225 833(5522) 1')/225 5')/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 7+)/225 $/80,180%$/&21<9,1</:,1'2:69,1</6/,',1*'2250(7$/3$5$3(7&$3&21&5(7(&2/80160$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/5')/225(;7(5,25&211(&7,210$7(5,$/0$7(5,$/$1*/('7,0%(53(5*2/$02180(176,*1$*(72%(68%0,77(')253(50,77,1*%</,&(16('6,*1&2175$&725 6((6,7(3/$1)25327(17,$//2&$7,2166,=($1'48$17,7<7%'3(5=21,1*&2'(02180(176,*1$*(72%(68%0,77(')253(50,77,1*%</,&(16('6,*1&2175$&7256((6,7(3/$1)25327(17,$//2&$7,2166,=($1'48$17,7<7%'3(5=21,1*&2'(020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX05(;7(5,25(/(9$7,2166&$/(  1EAST ELEVATION6&$/(  2NORTH ELEVATION (COLOR)6&$/(  4SOUTH ELEVATION6&$/(  5WEST ELEVATION6&$/(  6COURTYARD EAST ELEVATION6&$/(  3COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION6&$/(  7SIGNAGE A6&$/(  8SIGNAGE B)LQDO6LWH3ODQ5HYLHZ 7,17('35(&$67:$//3$1(/87,/,7<%5,&.9(1((59(57,&$/0(7$/3$1(//$36,',1*9,1</6/,',1*'2259,1</:,1'2:),;('$:1,1*$/80,180%$/&21<*/$663$1(/6$/80,180%$/&21<3,&.(75$,/,1*020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX06(;7(5,250$7(5,$/6)LQDO6LWH3ODQ5HYLHZ 020(1780'(6,*1*5283//&3URMHFW1XPEHU3ULRU$YHQXH1RUWK$6W3DXO0LQQHVRWD6ROKHP&RPSDQLHV1VW6WUHHW6XLWH0LQQHDSROLV01ϰϲϮϬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĚŝŶĂ͕DŝŶŶĞƐŽƚĂX076+$'2:678',(6DECEMBER 21, 3 PMDECEMBER 21, 9 AMDECEMBER 21, NOONJUNE 21, 9 AMJUNE 21, NOONJUNE 21, 3 PMMARCH & SEPTEMBER 21, 9 AMMARCH & SEPTEMBER 21, NOONMARCH & SEPTEMBER 21, 3 PM)LQDO6LWH3ODQ5HYLHZ Debt A: First Mortgage 65,400,000 77.0%236,957 Subtotal 65,400,000 77.0%236,957 Category Equity 17,512,186 20.6%63,450 Local_Grant 2,008,000 2.4%7,275 Subtotal 19,520,186 23.0%70,725 TOTAL SOURCES 84,920,186 100.0% 307,682 Amount % of Cost Per Unit ACQUISITION COSTS 5,186,000 6.1% 18,790 Land Cost $21.95 psf 5,186,000 6.1% 18,790 CONSTRUCTION COSTS 64,003,318 75.4% 231,896 Residential Building and Site Costs 60,703,318 71.5%219,940 Green Certification Contingency $870 per 277 stall 300,000 0.4%1,087 Construction Contingency 3,000,000 4.7%10,870 SOIL REMEDIATION / CORRECTION 350,000 0.4% 1,268 350,000 0.4%1,268 PERMITS/FEES 2,937,030 3.5% 10,641 617,033 0.7%2,236 242,000 0.3%877 2,077,997 2.4%7,529 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,893,097 6.9% 21,352 1,228,000 1.4%4,449 255,000 0.3%924 1,042,725 1.2%3,778 909,000 1.1%3,293 269,700 0.3%977 2,013,672 2.4%7,296 175,000 0.2%634 FINANCING COSTS 3,450,575 4.1% 12,502 824,802 1.0%2,988 2,625,773 3.1%9,514 DEVELOPER FEE 3,100,166 3.7% 11,232 Developer Fee 3,100,166 3.7% 11,232 TOTAL USES 84,920,186 100% 307,682 Exhibit D - Initial TIF Pro Forma 4620 W. 77th Street Redevelopment City of Edina Sources and Uses 276 Mixed-Income Apts Detail S&UOther Sources Sources Percent Per Unit Percent Per Unit SOURCES AmountDebt USES Amount Soil Remediation & Correction Work Architectural, Engineering & Design Fees Title, Closing & Mort. Registration Construction/Lease Up Period Interest Environmental Engineering and Green Cred Common Areas and Finishes FF&E / Signage / Streetlights Legal and Accounting Other Soft Costs / Contruction Ptax City Permits / Approvals Studies and Neighborhood Costs Local SAC/WAC & Met SAC Developer Cash SPaRC Loan Soft Cost Contingency 11/8/2022 4620 W. 77th Street Redevelopment City of Edina 276 Mixed-Income Apts Estimated Operating Costs and Return Calcs Stabilized Income Year 1 Rental Income Gross Potential Rent 7,051,764 Less: 5.0% Stabilized Vacancy (352,588) Total Rental Income 6,699,176 Indoor Parking 1.5%517,500 Pets 1.5%52,992 Commercial 1.5%24,000 Storage 1.5%30,000 Internet 1.5%99,360 Utilities 1.5%414,000 Less: Vacancy (17,068) Total Other Residential Income 1,120,784 Effective Gross Income (EGI)7,819,960 Expenses Year 1 Rental Unit Expenses Operating Expenses 1,182,737 Management Fee: 4.0% EGI Fixed to EGI 312,798 Property Taxes 1,137,838 Total Rental Unit Expenses 2,633,373 Total Expenses 2,633,373 STABILIZED NET OPERATING INCOME 5,186,587 Tax Increment Financing Pooling Revenue Inflator:756,662 ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME 5,943,249 2025 Debt Service Debt Terms Year 1 Debt A: First Mortgage 30 yr amortization @ 4,960,470 Debt B: Other Loan 0 Total Debt Service 4,960,470 Debt Coverage Debt A & B 120% Debt Coverage w/o Tax Increment Financing Debt A & B 105% CASH FLOW 982,779 Returns Analysis Net Cash to Developer 982,779 Net Cash to Developer (w/o assistance) 226,117 Cash on Cash Annual Return 5.6% Cash on Cash Annual Return (w/o TIF assistance)1.3% Cash on Cost Annual Return 7.00% Cash on Cost Annual Return (w/o TIF assistance)6.11% Total Development Cost: 84,920,186 7.00% Market Return Rate (Cash-on-Cost) Target: 5,944,413 Less: Stabilized Net Operating Income (NOI): 5,186,587 A)Stabilized NOI Financing Gap: 757,826 B)Pooling TIF Available for TIF Assistance: 756,662 Annual TIF Note Payment (Lesser of A or B): 756,662 E-1 4857-0656-8240\2 Exhibit E Form of Go-Ahead Letter [DEVELOPER LETTERHEAD] [Date] City Manager/City of Edina Executive Director/ Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, MN 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear [______]: This letter is submitted pursuant to Section 4.5 of that certain Redevelopment Agreement by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”); the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); and 4620 LLC (the “Developer”), dated as of _______________, 2022 (the “Redevelopment Agreement”), and is provided as the “Go-Ahead Letter” thereunder. Capitalized terms used in this letter and not defined herein have the meaning given to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. In accordance with Section 4.5 of the Redevelopment Agreement, Developer hereby represents, warrants, and certifies to the City and the Authority that: (i) the debt and equity Financing Commitments have been received by Developer and true and correct copies of the same are attached hereto as Exhibit A; (ii) the organizational chart of Developer attached hereto as Exhibit B includes the identity (including name, city and state of each) the identity of all parties with a Beneficial Interest in Developer; (iii) true and correct copies of the final purchase agreement and other land acquisition documents related to Developer’s acquisition of the Project Area are attached hereto as Exhibit C, and (iv) the updated TIF Pro Forma attached hereto as Exhibit D is true and correct in all material respects as of the date hereof; and (v) Developer is prepared to close on all financing required for the Minimum Improvements and commence construction of the Minimum Improvements, in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement. Sincerely, 4620 LLC By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: __________________________________________ E-2 4857-0656-8240\2 Exhibit A Financing Commitments (See attached) E-3 4857-0656-8240\2 Exhibit B Organizational Chart of Developer (See attached) E-4 4857-0656-8240\2 Exhibit C Final Purchase Agreement and Land Acquisition Documents (See attached) E-5 4857-0656-8240\2 Exhibit D Updated TIF Proforma (See attached) F-1 4867-7401-9632\3 Exhibit F Form of Certificate of Completion with Completion Checklist CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION (4620 W. 77th Street) A. 4620 LLC (“Developer”), pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (the “Authority”) and Developer dated effective as of _______________, 2022 (as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”), which Redevelopment Agreement is evidenced of record by that certain Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement dated ____________, 2022 and recorded on ________________, 2022 in the office of the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. ____________, has agreed to complete the Project, as defined in and in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement, on that certain real property (the “Property”) located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described on the attached Exhibit A. B. As of the date hereof, Developer has completed construction of the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement. C. The issuance of this Certificate of Completion by the City and the Authority is not intended nor shall it be construed to be a warranty or representation by the City or the Authority as to the structural soundness of the Minimum Improvements, including, but not limited to, the quality of materials, workmanship or the fitness of the Minimum Improvements for their proposed use. NOW THEREFORE, this is to certify that all construction and other physical improvements specified to be done and made by Developer with regard to the Minimum Improvements have been completed, and the provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement imposing obligations on Developer to construct the Minimum Improvements, are hereby satisfied and terminated, and the Registrar of Titles in and for the County of Hennepin, Minnesota is hereby authorized to record this instrument to be a conclusive determination of the satisfactory termination of said provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement. Dated: ______________, 20___ [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] F-2 [Signature Page to Certificate of Completion] 4867-7401-9632\3 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By _______________________________________ _____________________, Mayor By _______________________________________ _____________________, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 202___, by ___________ and ___________, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. Notary Public F-3 [Signature Page to Certificate of Completion] 4867-7401-9632\3 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By _______________________________________ _____________________, Chair By _______________________________________ _____________________, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 20___, by ___________ and ___________, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 F-4 [Exhibit A to Certificate of Completion] 4867-7401-9632\3 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said Tract B, a distance of 286.31 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 12 minutes 31 seconds East 473.90 feet to the south line of said Tract B and said line there terminating. F-5 4867-7401-9632\3 Certificate of Completion Checklist (4620 W. 77th Street) This is a summary of the deliverable requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street) dated _______________, 2022. This sheet is intended to be completed in connection with Developer’s request for a Certificate of Completion and prior to the issuance of the TIF Note. This sheet is provided for convenience and does not modify the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement. PART ONE Description of Required Minimum Improvements Satisfactorily Completed (yes or no) Notes A. Completion*of the Minimum Improvements of the 7-story residential building at 4620 W. 77th Street with approximately 276 apartment units (including at least 110 workforce units and at least 28 affordable units) B. Confirmation of Environmental Sustainability Requirements C. Completion ** of Public Road D. Completion ** of Plaza and Streetscapes (woonerf) E. Completion ** of Public Art *As evidenced by CO or TCO by Building Department **As evidenced by acceptance of site and street improvements by Engineering and/or Community Development Departments PART TWO Description of Required Public Benefits Satisfactorily Completed (yes or no) Notes A. Public Access Easement for Plaza and Streetscapes* B. Public Road Easement for Public Road* C. Satisfaction Equity and Diversity Report as required in the Redevelopment Agreement D. Delivery of the Housing Restrictive Covenant *Documents must be executed and recorded CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE F-6 4867-7401-9632\3 PART THREE Description of Final Costs Incurred and Gap Analysis Confirmed Amounts Notes A. Confirmation that no Default remains uncured. Yes or No B. Reimbursement for City’s out of pocket costs related to TIF Agreement Yes or No C. Confirmation that Developer has submitted final TIF Pro Forma to reflect actual costs Yes or No D. Total Amount of Qualified Redevelopment Costs confirmed as expended $ Estimated to be $____ E. Total Development Costs of Minimum Improvements $ Estimated to be $____ F. Confirmation that contingency funds used as required. Yes or No G. Total Amount grant funds received $ H. Final financial gap to provide Market Return $ I. Principal Amount of Original TIF Note $ NTE lowest of $7.351 million or 10% of Total Development Cost Certificate of Completion Checklist – 4620 W. 77th Street Prepared by: ________________________________________ ___________________ Signature and Title Date Approved by: ________________________________________ ___________________ Signature, Date Edina City Manager / HRA Executive Director G-1 4869-3641-8096\2 Exhibit G Form of Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement MEMORANDUM OF REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (this “Memorandum”) is entered into as of ______________________, 2022, by and among the City of Edina Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (“Authority”), 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”). RECITALS: A. The City, Authority, and Developer (collectively, the “Parties”) have entered into a certain Redevelopment Agreement dated as of _______________, 2022 (as the same may be amended, modified, and/or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”), whereby the parties have agreed to various aspects of the redevelopment of certain real property more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A, together with all improvements, tenements, easements, rights and appurtenances pertaining to such real property, lying and being in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Property”). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of the Redevelopment Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The above recitals are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. Capitalized terms, when not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. 3. The Parties have entered into the Redevelopment Agreement to set forth the terms and provisions governing the redevelopment of the Property. 4. This Memorandum has been executed and delivered by the Parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice that a contractual relationship for the redevelopment of the Property has been created between the Parties in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Agreement. The Parties intend, declare and covenant, on behalf of themselves and all future owners and operators of the Property, that the Redevelopment Agreement and the covenants and restrictions set forth therein regulating and restricting the use, occupancy and transfer of the Property (a) shall be and are covenants running with the Property, encumbering the Property, binding upon the Parties’ successors in title and all subsequent owners and operators of the Property; (b) are not merely personal covenants of the Parties; and (c) shall bind the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. 5. The terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum as if fully set forth herein. 6. This Memorandum may be executed separately in counterparts which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Remainder of page left blank intentionally; signature pages follow] G-2 [Signature Page to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street)] 4869-3641-8096\2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Memorandum as of the date first written above. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: __________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 2022, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. ____________________________________________ Notary Public G-3 [Signature Page to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street)] 4869-3641-8096\2 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ James Pierce, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2022, by James B. Hovland and James Pierce, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. ____________________________________________ Notary Public G-4 [Signature Page to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street)] 4869-3641-8096\2 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: _________________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ________________, 2022, by _______________, the _______________ of 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________________ Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 G-5 [Exhibit A to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4620 W. 77th Street)] 4869-3641-8096\2 Exhibit A Legal Description That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said Tract B, a distance of 286.31 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 12 minutes 31 seconds East 473.90 feet to the south line of said Tract B and said line there terminating. H-1 4861-0280-0944\3 Exhibit H Form of TIF Note LIMITED REVENUE TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT NOTE (4620 W. 77th Street) No. R-_____ $[__________] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA LIMITED REVENUE TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT NOTE The HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (the “Authority”) acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, promises to pay to the order of 4620 LLC (“Developer”), solely from the source, to the extent and in the manner hereinafter provided, up to the principal amount of this Limited Revenue Taxable Tax Increment Note (this “Note”) as provided herein, together with simple interest thereon accrued on the unpaid principal balance hereof from the date hereof, at the rate of interest of six percent (6%) per annum , on the Payment Dates (as hereinafter defined). This Note is executed and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated as of _______________, 2022, by and among the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”), the Authority and Developer (as the same may be amended, modified, and/or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. This Note is a special and limited obligation and not a general obligation of the Authority, which has been issued by the Authority pursuant to, and in full conformity with, the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended (the “TIF Act”), and the terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement and a resolution of the Board of the Authority, to aid in financing a “project” (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 8) of the Authority within the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2014-02 (the “TIF District”). This Note is subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in the Redevelopment Agreement and in the TIF Act, including, without limitation, (a) the provisions of Section 3.3 (TIF Assistance and Potential Adjustment) of the Redevelopment Agreement and (b) the provisions of Section 469.1763, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, which requires that not more than 25 percent of the total revenue derived from tax increment (as defined in the TIF Act) paid by properties in the TIF District (collectively, “Pooled Tax Increments”) may be expended on qualified activities in the project area that (i) are outside the geographic boundaries of the TIF District; or (ii) inside the TIF District but occurring after the initial five- year period after the certification of the TIF District, such as the Minimum Improvements. H-2 4861-0280-0944\3 Each payment on this Note is payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on the date of such payment is legal tender for public and private debts and shall be made by check or draft made payable to Developer and mailed to Developer at its postal address within the United States which shall be designated from time to time by Developer. Subject to the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement, principal of and interest on this Note shall be payable solely from and in the amount of Available Tax Increments (as hereinafter defined) on each February 1 and August 1 commencing on the first February 1 or August 1 immediately following the date hereof (the “Payment Dates”). On each Payment Date, the Authority shall apply Available Tax Increments to the payment of principal of and interest on this Note. To the extent that the Authority is unable to pay the total principal and interest due on this Note at or prior to February 1, 2044 (the “Maturity Date”) as a result of its having received as of such date insufficient Available Tax Increments, such failure shall not constitute a default under this Note and the Authority shall have no further obligation to pay unpaid balance of principal or accrued interest that may remain after such Maturity Date. All payments made by the Authority on this Note shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to the principal amount of this Note. If Available Tax Increment is insufficient to pay any accrued interest due, such unpaid interest shall be carried forward without interest. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and charged for actual days principal is unpaid. “Available Tax Increments” means Pooled Tax Increments that is Unobligated Increment and which have been actually received and retained by the Authority from the County of Hennepin, Minnesota, pursuant to the TIF Act, for the six (6) months before each Payment Date, less any administrative expenses incurred by the City and/or the Authority relating to the TIF District to the extent permitted by the TIF Act and the Redevelopment Agreement and to the extent that such expenses have not been paid or reimbursed to the City and/or the Authority, as applicable, by Developer. “Outstanding Obligations” means outstanding bonds, binding contracts, and other outstanding financial obligations of the TIF District (as such terms are defined in the TIF Act) issued prior to the date of this Agreement to which Tax Increment is pledged. “Unobligated Increment” means any Tax Increment not required for payment of Outstanding Obligations due during the six months following the transfer of Tax Increment for Outstanding Obligations. EXCEPT AS TO THE OBLIGATION TO MAKE PAYMENTS FROM THE AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS, THIS NOTE IS NOT A DEBT OF THE AUTHORITY, THE CITY, OR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA (THE “STATE”), AND NEITHER THE AUTHORITY, THE CITY, THE STATE NOR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF SHALL BE LIABLE ON THIS NOTE, NOR SHALL THIS NOTE BE PAYABLE OUT OF ANY FUNDS OR PROPERTIES OTHER THAN AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS. Upon an Event of Default by Developer under the Redevelopment Agreement, the Authority may exercise the remedies with respect to this Note described in the Redevelopment Agreement, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference, including, without limitation, the suspension or termination of the Authority’s obligation to make any payments under this Note. For avoidance of doubt, the terms of Redevelopment Agreement incorporated herein by the foregoing reference, shall, for purposes of this Note, survive any termination of the Redevelopment Agreement occurring after the issuance of this Note. H-3 4861-0280-0944\3 The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under this Note is prepayable in whole or in part at any time by the Authority without premium or penalty. No partial prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to be made under this Note. Developer shall never have or be deemed to have the right to compel any exercise of any taxing power of the Authority or the City or any other public body, and neither the Authority nor the City nor any director, commissioner, council member, board member, officer, employee or agent of the Authority or the City, nor any person executing or registering this Note shall be liable personally hereon by reason of the issuance or registration hereof or otherwise. THE AUTHORITY MAKES NO REPRESENTATION, COVENANT, OR WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, THAT THE AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO PAY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THIS NOTE. NO HOLDER OF THIS NOTE SHALL HAVE RIGHTS AGAINST THE AUTHORITY EXCEPT FOR DISTRIBUTION OF AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS. Except as otherwise provided in the Redevelopment Agreement, this Note shall not be assignable or transferable without the prior written consent of the Authority. Any assignee or transferee must execute and deliver to the Authority a certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Authority, pursuant to which, among other things, such assignee or transferee acknowledges and represents: (i) the limited nature of the Authority’s payment obligations under this Note, (ii) that this Note is being acquired for investment for such assignee’s or transferee’s own account, not as a nominee or agent, and not with a view to the resale or distribution of any part thereof, (iii) that the assignee or transferee has no present intention of selling, granting any participation in, or otherwise distributing the same, (iv) that the assignee or transferee is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501 of the Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (v) that the assignee or transferee, either alone or with such assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters and is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment in this Note and the assignee or transferee is able to bear the economic consequences thereof, (vi) that in making its decision to acquire this Note, the assignee or transferee has relied upon independent investigations made by the assignee or transferee and, to the extent believed by such assignee or transferee to be appropriate, the assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, including its own professional, tax and other advisors, and has not relied upon any representation or warranty from the Authority, or any of its officers, employees, agents, affiliates or representatives, with respect to the value of this Note, (vii) that the Authority has not made any warranty, acknowledgment or covenant, in writing or otherwise, to the assignee or transferee regarding the tax consequences, if any, of the acquisition and investment in this Note, (viii) that the assignee or transferee or its representatives have been given a full opportunity to examine all documents and to ask questions of, and to receive answers from, the Authority and its representatives concerning the terms of this Note and such other information as the assignee or transferee desires in order to evaluate the acquisition of and investment in this Note, and all such questions have been answered to the full satisfaction of the assignee or transferee, (ix) that the assignee or transferee has evaluated the merits and risks of investment in this Note and has determined that this Note is a suitable investment for the assignee or transferee in light of such party’s overall financial condition and prospects, (x) that this Note will be characterized as “restricted securities” under the federal securities laws because this Note is being acquired in a transaction not involving a public offering and that under such laws and applicable regulations such securities may not be resold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except in certain limited circumstances, and (xi) that no market for this Note exists and no market for this Note is intended to be developed. This Note is issued pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement and resolutions of the Board of the Authority and is entitled to the benefits thereof, which Redevelopment Agreement and resolutions are incorporated herein by reference. H-4 4861-0280-0944\3 IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions, and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened, and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note have been done, have happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by law; and that this Note, together with all other indebtedness of the Authority or the City outstanding on the date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the Authority or the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank; signatures on following page] H-5 4861-0280-0944\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, has caused this Note to be executed by the manual signatures of the Chair and the Secretary of the Authority, and has caused this Note to be dated as of the date of original issue specified above. Chair Secretary I-1 Exhibit I Form of SPaRC Fund Forgivable Loan Agreement Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund) This Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund) (this “Agreement”), made and entered into as of this ____ day of ____________, 2022, between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and 4620 LLC (“Borrower”). Recitals: A. Borrower is the owner of that certain land located at 4620 W. 77th Street, Edina, Minnesota, as legally described on Exhibit A (the “Project Area”). B. Borrower, the Authority, and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City) are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement, dated ______________, 2022 (the “Redevelopment Agreement”), pursuant to which the Authority and the City have agreed to provide certain financial support to Borrower in connection with Borrower’s redevelopment of the Project Area by demolition of an existing three-level office building and related parking and improvements located within the Project Area and the development and construction of the following “Project”, all as more particularly described in the Redevelopment Agreement: (i) a single, seven-story building with 276 apartment units, including at least 110 workforce rental apartment units and 28 affordable rental apartment units; (ii) the public plaza, sidewalk and streetscape improvements and amenities connecting 77th Street to Fred Richards Park and adjoining the Project, as required under the terms of the City Approvals; (iii) the fire truck road and vehicular park access road located between the 4600 and 4570 W. 77th Street buildings and connecting 77th Street to Fred Richards Park, as required under the terms of the City Approvals; and (iv) such other improvements required under the terms of the City Approvals. C. Upon completion, the Project is anticipated to deliver many benefits to the general public. In addition to the redevelopment of an underutilized building and long-term increase in the property tax base, this project will deliver additional public benefits including, without limitation, creation of new affordable housing units, stormwater improvements, environmental remediation, streetscape improvements, and dedication of land for future roadway. D. Pursuant to the temporary authority for use of increment granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, subdivision 4n (the “Act”), on October 28, 2021 the Authority adopted, and on November 16, 2021, the City approved a written spending plan for unobligated tax increment monies for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (the “Spending Plan”) and established the Special Projects and Redevelopment Capital Fund (the “SPaRC Fund”) to encourage and incentivize new private investment in I-2 the City’s commercial and industrial districts by providing loans, grants and/or equity for development projects in accordance with the Spending Plan. E. As set forth in the Redevelopment Agreement, pursuant to the Act and the Spending Plan, and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Authority, believing that the Project is in the best interest of the City, desires provide a forgivable loan of unobligated tax increment revenue to Borrower from the SPaRC Fund in the maximum principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “Loan”) to assist in financing the Project, such Loan being referred to in the Redevelopment Agreement as the “SPaRC Forgivable Loan”. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 Recitals; Exhibits, Definitions 1.01. Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. 1.02. Exhibits. All Exhibits referred to in and attached to this Agreement upon execution are incorporated in and form a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. 1.03. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise specifies or requires, the following terms have the following definitions. Certain other capitalized terms are defined elsewhere in this Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein or unless context requires otherwise, undefined terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Redevelopment Agreement. All defined terms may be used in the singular or the plural, as the context requires. ARTICLE 2 Representations and Warranties 2.01. Authority Representations. The Authority makes the following representations to Borrower: (a) The Authority is a public body corporate and politic and a governmental subdivision of the state of Minnesota, duly organized and existing under State law and the Authority has the authority to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (b) The Authority has the power under applicable state law to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. 2.02. Borrower Representations. Borrower makes the following representations to the Authority: (a) Borrower is a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has power to enter into this Agreement and has duly authorized, by all necessary corporate action, the execution and delivery of this Agreement. (b) Neither the execution or delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement is prevented by, limited by, conflicts with, or results in a breach of, I-3 any restriction, agreement or instrument to which Borrower is now a party or by which Borrower is bound. (c) There is no legal or regulatory proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened (or any basis therefor) against Borrower or the Project, which, when and however decided, could have a material adverse affect on the condition or business of Borrower or its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement. (d) Borrower has no actual knowledge that any member of the Board of the Authority, or any other officer of the Authority or the City has any direct or indirect financial interest in Borrower, the Project Area, or the Project. (e) Borrower would not undertake the Project without the financial assistance to be provided by the Authority pursuant to this Agreement. The foregoing representations and warranties, as well as the facts contained in the Recitals, shall be continuing in nature and shall be true and correct as of the date made, at the date of the initial advance and at the dates of all subsequent advances of the proceeds of the Loan. ARTICLE 3 SPaRC Fund Loan 3.01. Loan for Qualified Costs. The Authority agrees to make the Loan to Borrower subject to the following terms and conditions, and the other terms, conditions, and restrictions of this Agreement: (a) The maximum principal amount of the Loan will be $2,000,000. (b) The Loan funds may be used only to pay for those costs incurred by Borrower in connection with the Project which are shown on Exhibit B (collectively, “Qualified Costs”), provided such Qualified Cost are eligible for reimbursement pursuant to the Act. (c) The Loan shall be evidenced by a note to be executed by Borrower and delivered to the Authority, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C (the “Note”). (d) Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default, the unpaid principal of the Loan shall bear interest at the rate described in the Note. (e) No Disbursement Request (defined below) may be submitted to the Authority later than November 15, 2025 (“Disbursement Request Deadline”) in order for the Authority to make all Loan advances and pay the corresponding Qualified Costs before the SPaRC Expiration Date (as defined below), and, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Authority shall have no obligation to accept any Disbursement Request or to make any Loan advances after the SPaRC Expiration Date. 3.02. Loan Disbursement; Disbursement Request. The Authority will make Loan advances from time to time to an escrow agent (to be mutually agreed upon by the Authority and Borrower) (the “Escrow Agent”) to be disbursed to pay Qualified Costs pursuant to the terms of this Agreement upon review and approval of disbursement requests as provided herein. Requests for disbursement of portions of the Loan shall be originated by Borrower by delivering to the Authority and the Escrow Agent a disbursement request in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D (the “Disbursement Request”) and AIA Documents G702 and 703 (along with written evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Authority that Qualified Costs in the amount to I-4 be disbursed have been incurred for the Project as demonstrated by invoices from each provider of service to be paid and a certification from the Borrower’s architect). Within 10 working days after receipt of the Disbursement Request, the Authority shall approve or disapprove the Disbursement Request, and if approved, shall forward the Disbursement Request and a sufficient amount of the Loan to pay said Disbursement Request to Escrow Agent, subject to the condition that, before disbursing such Loan advance, Escrow Agent must obtain partial and/or full lien waivers, lien releases or lien satisfactions, in the customary form from the general contractor and all subcontractors and material suppliers with whom the general contractor has contracted with in connection with the Qualified Costs of the Project. If the Escrow Agent is unable to obtain such waivers, releases and/or satisfactions with respect to any Disbursement Request, the Authority shall be entitled, but not obligated, to revoke its approval of such Disbursement Request. Borrower hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Authority and Escrow Agent from any and all claims, demands or costs associated with the disbursement of the Loan, including reasonable attorney’s fees arising therefrom. The foregoing notwithstanding, upon the consent of the Authority, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, the disbursement process set forth in this Section may be modified if required by the lender that funds Borrower’s loan funding of construction of the Project (the “Borrower’s Lender”). 3.03. Satisfaction of Conditions Precedent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Authority’s obligation to advance any portion of the Loan shall be subject to satisfaction, or waiver in writing by the Authority, of all of the following conditions precedent: (a) Borrower shall have executed and delivered the Note to the Authority. (b) There shall then be no uncured Event of Default and no act, event, condition or omission shall have occurred which, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute an Event of Default hereunder or under the Redevelopment Agreement, and the Authority shall have received a certificate to that effect dated the date of each such advance and signed by Borrower. (c) The representations of Borrower set forth in Section 2.02 shall continue be true and correct in all material respects as of the date of such advance. 3.04. Loan Forgiveness . So long there is then no uncured Event of Default, upon the Authority’s issuance of the Certificate of Completion in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement, the Authority shall forgive the Loan by furnishing Borrower with a certification in the form attached hereto in Exhibit E (the “Certificate of Forgiveness”) reasonably promptly after Borrower’s request. If the Authority shall refuse or fail to provide a Certificate of Forgiveness within 30 days following Borrower’s request, the Authority shall provide Borrower with a written statement specifying in what respects Borrower has failed to comply with the Agreement, the Loan, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or acts will be necessary, in the reasonable opinion of the Authority, for Borrower to obtain the Certificate of Forgiveness. Notwithstanding herein to the contrary, subject to Unavoidable Delays, in no event and under no circumstances will the Authority be obligated to forgive the Loan, if Borrower has not obtained the Certificate of Completion in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement by September 1, 2027 (“Completion Deadline”). 3.05. Nature of Edina SPaRC Fund. The authority for the Authority to transfer or loan unobligated incremental property taxes under the Act (as the same have been allocated to the SPaRC Fund) expires on December 31, 2025 (the “SPaRC Expiration Date”) and all such transferred increments must be spent by such SPaRC Expiration Date. As such, to minimize the amount of increment that the Authority would be require to “return” under the Act, if the Loan is not fully forgiven as provided herein, any amounts I-5 paid or repaid to the Authority by Borrower shall be from sources of funds of Borrower other than the loaned unobligated incremental property taxes from the SPaRC Fund. ARTICLE 4 Defaults and Remedies 4.01. Borrower Events of Default. Subject to Unavoidable Delay, the following shall be “Events of Default” under this Agreement and the term “Event of Default” shall mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events (a) Subject to Unavoidable Delays the failure by Borrower to obtain the Certificate of Completion in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement by the Completion Deadline. (b) Failure of Borrower to timely pay to the Authority any amounts required to be paid by Borrower hereunder. (c) Subject to Unavoidable Delay, and except as provided in Sections 4.01(a) through (b) hereof, failure by Borrower to observe or perform any other covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement, and the continuation of such failure for a period of 30 days after written notice of such failure from the Authority; provided, however, if any such failure reasonably requires more than 30 days to cure, such failure shall not constitute an Event of Default, provided Borrower promptly commenced such cure upon receipt by Borrower of the written notice of the default, and with due diligence is thereafter continuously prosecutes such cure to completion and is completed within a reasonable period of time, and provided that Borrower keeps the Authority informed at all times of its progress in curing the default, provided that in no event shall such additional cure period for any default extend beyond 90 days. (d) The occurrence of an Event of Default under the Redevelopment Agreement. 4.02. Authority Remedies on Borrower Default. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Authority may take any one or more of the following actions: (a) Suspend its performance under this Agreement (including, without limitation, refraining from making any Loan advance under this Agreement) until it receives assurances from Borrower deemed reasonably adequate by the Authority, that Borrower will cure the Event of Default and continue its performance under this Agreement, but Lender may make Loan advances after the happening of any such event without hereby waiving the right to refrain from making other or further Loan advances or to exercise any of the other rights Lender may have. (b) In the case of a material default that is not cured within a reasonable period of time, terminate all rights of Borrower under this Agreement. (c) Withhold the Certificate of Completion under the Redevelopment Agreement. (d) Withhold the Certificate of Forgiveness. (e) To declare the entire unpaid principal of the Loan and all accrued interest thereon immediately due and payable without further notice. I-6 (f) Take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to the Authority to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Borrower under this Agreement. 4.03. Authority Default; Remedies Upon Authority Default. In the event the Authority should fail to observe or perform any covenant, agreement or obligation of the Authority on its part to be observed and performed under this Agreement and such failure continues for more than 30 days after written notice by Borrower to the Authority of such failure, Borrower may take any one or more of the following actions: (a) Suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from the Authority deemed adequate by Borrower, that the Authority will cure its default and continue its performance under this Agreement. (b) In the case of a material default that is not cured within a reasonable period of time, terminate all rights of the Authority under this Agreement. (c) Take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to Borrower to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Authority under this Agreement. 4.04. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the Authority, or to Borrower is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the Authority, or Borrower to exercise any remedy reserved to them, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than such notice as may be required under this Agreement. 4.05. Waivers. All waivers by any party to this Agreement shall be in writing. If any provision of this Agreement is breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. 4.06. Agreement to Pay Costs and Attorneys’ Fees. Whenever any Event of Default occurs and the non-defaulting party shall employ attorneys or incur any other costs or expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of the defaulting party herein contained, the defaulting party agrees that it shall, on demand therefor, pay to the Authority the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by the non-defaulting party, together with interest thereon at the rate of interest for the Loan set forth in the Note. ARTICLE 5 Insurance; Indemnification 5.01. Insurance. Borrower will, at its expense, carry such type and amount of insurance concerning the contents of the Project Area as is required under the Redevelopment Agreement. I-7 5.02. Indemnification. (a) Borrower releases and covenants and agrees that the Authority, and its respective governing body members and elected officials, officers, employees, agents, independent contractors and attorneys (collectively the “Indemnified Parties”), shall not be liable for and agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties against any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about, or resulting from any defect in the Project constructed by Borrower, except to the extent attributable to the negligence or intentional misconduct of any Indemnified Party. (b) Except to the extent of the negligence or intentional misconduct of any Indemnified Party, Borrower shall indemnify and defend the Indemnified Parties, now and forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claims, demands, suits, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees), actions or other proceedings whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising from the actions or inactions of Borrower, or any of its owners, agents, contractors, or employees, under this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and/or operation of the Project. ARTICLE 6 Prohibitions Against Assignment and Transfer 6.01. Except as permitted under the Redevelopment Agreement, Borrower shall not sell, assign, convey, lease or transfer in any other mode or manner any of its right, title, and interest in and to all or any part of the Project Area or this Agreement without the express written approval of the Authority. For avoidance of doubt, Borrower may assign this Agreement simultaneously with any assignment of the Redevelopment Agreement and to the same assignee of the Redevelopment, subject to the same terms, conditions, and requirements applicable to an assignment of the Redevelopment Agreement set forth in the Redevelopment Agreement.In the absence of specific written agreement by the Authority to the contrary, neither the transfer of the Project Area nor the assignment of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Forgiveness will relieve Borrower of its obligations under this Agreement and the Note. ARTICLE 7 Additional Provisions 7.01. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of the date (a) a Certificate of Forgiveness is provided to Borrower from the Authority, or (ii) the date this Agreement is terminated or rescinded in accordance with its terms (the “Termination Date”). 7.02. Damage or Destruction. Upon any damage or destruction of the Project Area, or any portion thereof, by fire or other casualty, before the Termination Date, should Borrower commence or cause to be commenced the process required to repair, reconstruct and restore the damaged or destroyed Project Area, or portion thereof, the Authority shall continue to provide the Loan contemplated herein. If, upon such damage or destruction of the Project Area, Borrower decides not to repair, reconstruct or restore the damaged or destroyed Project Area, the Authority shall not be required to provide the Loan contemplated herein. 7.03. Equal Employment Opportunity. Borrower, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that during the construction of the Project it will comply with any applicable affirmative action and nondiscrimination laws or regulations. I-8 7.04. Restrictions on Use. Borrower agrees for itself, and its successors and assigns, and every successor in interest to the Project Area, or any part thereof, that Borrower, and such successors and assigns, shall devote the Project Area to, and only to and in accordance with, the uses specified in this Agreement and other agreements entered into between Borrower and the Authority, and shall not discriminate upon the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, sexual orientation, and familial status in the sale, lease, or rental or in the use or occupancy of the Project Area or any improvements erected or to be erected thereon, or any part thereof. 7.05. Legal and Administrative Expenses. Borrower agrees to pay all fees and expenses incurred by the Authority in connection with review and analysis of the development proposed under this Agreement and the negotiating, approval and documentation of this Agreement, but not limited to, attorney and municipal advisor fees and expenses. 7.06. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by reputable overnight courier, sent registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, and addressed to: Borrower at: c/o 4620 LLC Attn: Curt Gunsbury 724 N First Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 with a copy to: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 The Authority at: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this section. 7.07. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury. All matters, whether sounding in tort or in contract, relating to the validity, construction, performance, or enforcement of this Agreement shall be controlled by, interpreted and determined in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota without regard to its conflict and choice of law provisions. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be venued exclusively in Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, state of Minnesota and shall not be removed therefrom to any other federal or state court. The Authority and Borrower hereby consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in the foregoing court. The Authority and Borrower hereby waive trial by jury for any litigation arising out of this Agreement. I-9 7.08. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable under applicable Law, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term or provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law. 7.09. Consents and Approvals. Whenever the terms “consent,” “approve,” or “approval” are used herein, they shall mean consent or approvals which shall not be unreasonably conditioned or delayed, unless specifically provided otherwise. All consents or approvals must be delivered in writing in order to be effective. 7.10. Additional Documents. When reasonably requested to do so by another party, each party shall execute or cause to be executed any further documents as may be reasonably necessary or expedient and within their lawful obligation in order to consummate the transactions provided for in, and to carry out the purpose and intent of, this Agreement. 7.11. Limitation. All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the Authority or Borrower contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the Authority and Borrower, and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant, manager or employee of the Authority or Borrower in the individual capacity thereof. 7.12. Authority Approval. Unless the Board, as applicable, determines otherwise in its discretion, all approvals and other actions required of or taken by the Authority shall be effective upon action by the Authorized Representative of the Authority, as applicable (or in either case his/her designee), unless (a) this Agreement explicitly provides for approval by the Board of the Authority, (b) approval by the Board is required by law or (c) the approval, in the opinion of the Executive Director, would result in a material change in the terms of this Agreement. 7.13. Superseding Effect. This Agreement reflects the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the items covered by this Agreement, and supersedes in all respects all prior agreements of the parties, whether written or otherwise, with respect to the items covered by this Agreement. 7.14. Relationship of Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed, to create a partnership or joint venture among or between the parties hereto, and the rights and remedies of the parties hereto shall be strictly as set forth in this Agreement. 7.15. Survival of Terms. The following Sections will survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement: Section 4.02 through 4.06 [Remedies on Default, etc.] to the extent of any Event of Default arising prior to such termination or expiration; Section 5.01 [Insurance]; Section 5.02 [Indemnification]; Section 7.06 [Notices and Demands]; Section 7.07 [Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury]; Section 7.11 [Limitation]; Section 7.17 [No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability]; and Section 7.18 [Limited Liability]. 7.16. Data Practices Act. Borrower acknowledges that all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Borrower with regard to the performance of its duties under this Agreement are subject to the requirements of Chapter 13, Minnesota Statutes. 7.17. No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way affect or impair the Authority’s immunity or the immunity of the Authority’s employees, consultants and contractors, whether on account of official immunity, legislative immunity, statutory immunity, discretionary immunity or otherwise. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way affect I-10 or impair the limitations on the Authority’s liability or the liability of the Authority’s employees, consultants and independent contractors. By entering into this Agreement, the Authority does not waive any rights, protections, or limitations as provided under law and equity for the Authority, or of their respective employees, consultants and contractors. 7.18. Limited Liability. Notwithstanding anything to contrary provided in this Agreement, it is specifically understood and agreed, such agreement being the primary consideration for the execution of this Agreement by Borrower, that (a) there should be absolutely no personal liability on the part of any director, officer, manager, member, employee or agent of Borrower or the Authority with respect to any terms, covenants and conditions in this Agreement; (b) Borrower and the Authority waive all claims, demands and causes of action against the other parties’ directors, officers, managers, members, employees and agents in any Event of Default, by either party, as the case may be, of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement to be performed by either party; and (c) Borrower and the Authority, as the case may be, shall look solely to the assets of the other party for the satisfaction of each and every applicable remedy in the Event of Default by any party, as the case may be, of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement such exculpation of liability to be absolute and without any exception whatsoever. 7.19. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and every term and condition hereof; provided, however, that if any date herein set forth for the performance of any obligations by Borrower or the Authority or for the delivery of any instrument or notice as herein provided should not be on a business day, the compliance with such obligations or delivery shall be deemed acceptable on the next following business day. 7.20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of such counterparts shall constitute one document. To facilitate execution of this Agreement, the parties may execute and exchange signature pages via DocuSign, Tagged Image File Format (“TIFF”) or via electronic mail (*.pdf or similar file types). The parties further agree that counterparts of this Agreement may be signed electronically via Adobe Sign, DocuSign protocol or another electronic platform. All such signatures may be used in the place of original “wet ink” signatures to this Agreement and shall have the same legal effect as the physical delivery of an original signature. 7.21. Amendments. This Agreement shall not be amended unless in writing and executed by the parties hereto.. 7.22. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. 7.23. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Authority and Borrower and their respective successors and assigns. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] I-11 [Signature Page to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ James Pierce, Secretary I-12 [Signature Page to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] 4620 LLC By: Name: Curt Gunsbury Its: CEO I-13 [Exhibit A to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] Exhibit A Legal Description That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said Tract B, a distance of 286.31 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 12 minutes 31 seconds East 473.90 feet to the south line of said Tract B and said line there terminating. I-14 [Exhibit B to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] Exhibit B Qualified Costs Pedestrian plaza and related improvements, including streetscape and landscape $414,000 Signage, wayfinding and monument related to the Park $80,000 Improvements for vehicular access via permanent easement on Pentagon North property $1,000,000 Area stormwater management and treatment (tanks will be within the public plaza) $214,000 Soil corrections and utilities for all public areas $300,000 Estimated Total $2,008,000* The actual amount of Qualified Costs within each of the foregoing categories may be allocated among such categories (in amounts that differ from these set forth in the table above), subject to reasonable review and approval by the Authority, and provided that Borrower must provide reasonable evidence of the actual amounts of Qualified Costs actually incurred or committed in each such category. The total principal amount of the Loan to disburse to Borrower for Qualified Costs of the Project will not exceed $2,000,000. I-15 [Exhibit C to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] Exhibit C Form of Note No. R-1 $2,000,000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA FORGIVABLE NOTE FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Lender”), on or before September 1, 2027 (the “Maturity Date”, such date being the Completion Deadline under the Loan Agreement), the sum of $2,000,000.00, or so much as is advanced by Lender to, or for the benefit of, Borrower pursuant to that certain Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund), dated of even date herewith, as the same may be amended from time to time (the “Loan Agreement”), together with interest on the unpaid principal balance from time to time outstanding from the date of this Forgivable Note (this “Note”). Terms used herein but not otherwise defined, shall have the meaning attributed to them in the Loan Agreement. 1. This Note is subject to forgiveness by Lender subject to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement. If, as of the Maturity Date, Lender has not issued a Certificate of Forgiveness in accordance with the Loan Agreement, the unpaid principal balance of this Note, together with any accrued but unpaid interest, shall be immediately due and payable in full on the Maturity Date. 2. After maturity, whether by acceleration, the passage of time or otherwise, and during the continuance of an Event of Default under the Loan Agreement, the outstanding principal balance of this Note and accrued, unpaid interest shall bear interest at the rate which is six percent (6.0%) per annum until paid in full. Interest shall be calculated based on the actual number of days in a month over a year of 360 days. 3. All such interest and principal payments shall be made by Borrower in immediately available funds and without notice, demand or offset. Each payment on this Note is payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on the date of such payment is legal tender for public and private debts and shall be made by check or draft made payable to Lender and mailed to Lender at the postal address within the United States designated from time to time by Lender. 4. The principal balance of this Note may from time to time be prepaid, at the option of Borrower, in whole or in part without penalty under this Note. 5. All payments and prepayments, at the option to Lender, shall be applied first to any costs of collection, second to any late charges, third to accrued interest on this Note, and lastly to principal. 6. The occurrence of an Event of Default, as defined in the Loan Agreement, shall constitute an Event of Default hereunder (hereinafter referred to as an “Event of Default”). Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, Lender may take exercise all of its rights and remedies under the Loan Agreement, including, without limitation, declaring the outstanding unpaid principal balance of this Note, the accrued I-16 [Exhibit C to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] and unpaid interest thereon, and all other obligations of Borrower to Lender to be forthwith due and payable. Failure to exercise any right or remedy provided for or referenced herein shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same in connection with the applicable Event of Default or any subsequent Event of Default. 7. Borrower and all others who may become liable for the payment of all or any part of the debt under this Note do hereby severally waive presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, notice of intention to accelerate, notice of acceleration, protest and notice of protest and non-payment and all other notices of any kind. No release of any security for this Note or extension of time for payment of this Note or any installment hereof, and no alteration, amendment or waiver of any provision of this Note or the Loan Agreement made by agreement between Lender or any other person shall release, modify, amend, waive, extend, change, discharge, terminate or affect the liability of Borrower or any other person who may become liable for the payment of all or any part of the debt under this Note or the Loan Agreement. No notice to or demand on Borrower shall be deemed to be a waiver of the obligation of Borrower or of the right of Lender to take further action without further notice or demand as provided for in this Note or the Loan Agreement. 8. Borrower agrees that if, and as often as, this Note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or to defend or enforce any of Lender’s rights hereunder or under the Loan, Borrower will pay to Lender its attorneys’ fees and all court costs (including attorneys’ fees and court costs prior to trial, at trial and on appeal, or in any bankruptcy proceeding) and other expenses incurred in connection therewith. 9. This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the choice of law provisions thereof. 10. The authority for Lender to transfer or loan unobligated incremental property taxes under the Act (as the same have been allocated to the SPaRC Fund) expires on December 31, 2025 (the “SPaRC Expiration Date”) and all such transferred increments must be spent by such SPaRC Expiration Date. As such, as provided in the Loan Agreement (a) no Disbursement Request may be submitted to the Authority later than November 15, 2025 in order for the Authority to make all Loan advances and pay the corresponding Qualified Costs before the SPaRC Expiration Date and (b) to minimize the amount of increment that Lender would be require to “return” under the Act, if the Loan is not fully forgiven as provided in the Loan Agreement, any amounts paid or repaid to Lender by Borrower shall be from sources of funds of Borrower other than the loaned unobligated incremental property taxes from the SPaRC Fund. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused this Note to be executed by the manual signatures of the ________________ of Borrower and has caused this Note to be dated as of _________________, 2022. 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Its: I-17 [Exhibit D to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] Exhibit D Disbursement Request Number ____________ Date: ___________, 2022 The Undersigned, pursuant to that certain Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund), dated as of ______________, 2022 (the “Loan Agreement”), by and among the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the “Lender”), _______________ (“Escrow Agent”), and 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Borrower”), hereby certifies and requests as follows: 1. Borrower requests that the following amounts be paid by Lender and forwarded to Escrow Agent for payment to the following payees from the Loan as described in the Loan Agreement: Name and Address of Payee Amount Requested to be Paid 2. Attached hereto are invoices with respect to each item for which payment is requested pursuant to Paragraph 1 hereof and a certificate from the Borrower’s architect. 3. Borrower certifies that the disbursements are for Qualified Costs as defined in the Loan Agreement. 4. Borrower hereby requests Lender to approve this Disbursement Request and forward it to Escrow Agent for payment of the amounts listed in Paragraph 1 hereof. 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: __________________________________________ I-18 [Exhibit D to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] APPROVAL This Disbursement Request is hereby approved by ____________ Dated: _______________, 2022 By ______________________________ I-19 [Exhibit E to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] Exhibit E Certificate of Forgiveness WHEREAS, 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Borrower”), is the owner of property in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota described on Exhibit A hereto and made a part hereof (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property (shown in Exhibit A) is subject to the provisions of a certain Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund) (the “Agreement”), dated as of _______________, 2022, between Borrower and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the “Authority”); and WHEREAS, pursuant the Agreement, the Authority provided a Loan to Borrower evidenced by a certain Note (as such terms are defined in the Agreement); and WHEREAS, Borrower has fully and duly performed all of the covenants and conditions of Borrower under the Agreement with respect to the Project and the Loan. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby certified that all requirements of Borrower under the Agreement with respect to the Project and Loan have been completed and duly and fully performed, and this instrument is to be conclusive evidence of the satisfactory termination of the covenants and conditions of the Agreement as they relate to the Loan, and the Loan is hereby fully forgiven and satisfied. Dated this ____ day of ____________, 20__. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota By: __________________________________ Chair By: __________________________________ Secretary I-20 [Exhibit E to Forgivable Loan Agreement (Edina SPaRC Fund)] Exhibit A Legal Description That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said Tract B, a distance of 286.31 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 12 minutes 31 seconds East 473.90 feet to the south line of said Tract B and said line there terminating. 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 SALE ANALYSIS END OF YEAR Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Net Operating Income End of Year 5,442,093 5,573,692 5,707,923 5,844,838 5,984,491 6,126,938 6,272,233 6,420,435 Divided By Cap Rate 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% Gross Sale Price 98,947,152 101,339,855 103,780,411 106,269,778 108,808,933 111,398,871 114,040,608 116,735,179 Minus Debt A: First Mortgage 63,056,876 62,168,960 61,221,579 60,210,750 59,132,224 57,981,467 56,753,642 55,443,587 Net Sale Amount 35,890,276 39,170,894 42,558,832 46,059,028 49,676,709 53,417,404 57,286,966 61,291,593 Sales Expense 2.00% (1,978,943) (2,026,797) (2,075,608) (2,125,396) (2,176,179) (2,227,977) (2,280,812) (2,334,704) NET SALES PROCEEDS 33,911,333 37,144,097 40,483,223 43,933,633 47,500,531 51,189,427 55,006,154 58,956,889 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Net Sales Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Year Proceeds Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Net Investment (17,520,186) (17,520,186) (17,520,186) (17,520,186) (17,520,186) (17,520,186) (17,520,186) (17,520,186) 2024 00000000 2025 982,779 982,779 982,779 982,779 982,779 982,779 982,779 982,779 2026 1,109,267 1,109,267 1,109,267 1,109,267 1,109,267 1,109,267 1,109,267 1,109,267 2027 33,911,333 35,149,619 1,238,286 1,238,286 1,238,286 1,238,286 1,238,286 1,238,286 1,238,286 2028 37,144,097 0 38,513,981 1,369,884 1,369,884 1,369,884 1,369,884 1,369,884 1,369,884 2029 40,483,223 0 0 41,987,338 1,504,115 1,504,115 1,504,115 1,504,115 1,504,115 2030 43,933,633 0 0 0 45,574,663 1,641,030 1,641,030 1,641,030 1,641,030 2031 47,500,531 0 0 0 0 49,281,214 1,780,683 1,780,683 1,780,683 2032 51,189,427 0 0 0 0 0 53,112,557 1,923,130 1,923,130 2033 55,006,154 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,074,580 2,068,426 2034 58,956,889 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61,173,516 Total 19,721,479 24,324,127 29,167,368 34,258,807 39,606,388 45,218,415 51,103,568 57,270,930 INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN 21.31% 19.83% 18.77% 17.96% 17.32% 16.78% 16.33% 15.95% Section 3.4(d) IRR TARGET 22.00% 20.00% 20.00% 18.00% 18.00% 18.00% 18.00% 16.00% PROJECT RETURN EXCEEDED?No No No No No No No No Notes: Cap Rate: 5.50%Stabilized TIF Note: $7,351,000 Sales Expense: 2.00%TIF Note Rate: 6.00% Development Cost: $84,920,186 Annual TIF Assistance: $756,662 Net Equity Investment:$17,520,186 Annual Rent and Expense Inflator: 2.00% Initial First Mortgage:$65,400,000 Additional Debt: $0 Analaysis of potential Internal Rate of Return of TIF proforma project cashflows and potential sales through year 10. Sales proceeds assume onetime sale of the Minimum Improvements using valuation based on TIF pro forma Stabilized Net Operating Income. Annual cash flows include Net Operating Income (incuding TIF Assistance) less annual debt service and reserve allowance. Potential sales are hypothetical and provided solely for purposes of providing an example of the Sale Lookback provisions. Assumptions: IRR ANALYSIS END OF YEAR EXHIBIT J - Sample IRR Calculations and TIF Adjustment Calculations 4620 W. 77th Street Redevelopment City of Edina 276 Mixed-Income Apts Annualized Sales and Cashflow Analysis for Sample IRR Calculations Affordable Housing Program Policy Guide March 2022 Exhibit K Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide Table of Contents Introduction to the Affordable Multi-Family Housing Program (AHP)................ 4 Chapter 1 – Overview of Affordable Housing Program Policy ............5 1.1 Period of Affordability (POA) .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Affordable Dwelling Units (ADUs) ............................................................................................................ 5 Affordability Standards – Rental Projects ............................................................................................................ 5 Affordability Standards – For Sale Projects ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Student Households ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Rent Limits .......................................................... 6 1.5 Rental Assistance ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Allowable Fees and Charges ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.7 Fixed or Floating Affordable Dwelling Units ............................................................................................. 7 1.8 Rent Increases .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Utility Allowances ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.10 Record Retention ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.11 Leases ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.12 Income Certification ............................................................................................................................... 10 1.13 Increases in Income ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.14 Property Standards ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.15 Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan ............................................................................................... 10 1.16 Fair Lease and Grievance Procedures ..................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2 – Maintaining the Unit Mix ............................................ 11 2.1 Fixed Affordable Dwelling Units ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Floating Affordable Dwelling Units ........................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 3 – General Occupancy Guidelines .................................... 13 3.1 Qualification of Applicants ..................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Eligibility Determination ......................................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Change in Household Composition ......................................................................................................... 14 3.4 Minimum Lease Requirements ............................................................................................................... 14 3.5 House Rules ............................................................................................................................................ 15 3.6 Number of Persons Per Unit ................................................................................................................... 15 3.7 Tenant Selection Plan ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.8 Government Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement Form ................................................................. 15 3.9 Income Verification ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.10 Gross Annual Household Income ............................................................................................................ 16 3.11 Factors that Affect Household Size ......................................................................................................... 17 3.12 General Income Verification Requirements ............................................................................................ 18 3.13 Corrections to Documents ...................................................................................................................... 20 3.14 Effective Term of Verifications ............................................................................................................... 20 3.15 Over Income Households ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.16 Annual Recertification ............................................................................................................................ 20 3.17 Tenant Files ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Chapter 4 – Reporting Requirements ............................................. 22 4.1 Annual Owner/Agent Certifications ....................................................................................................... 22 4.2 Compliance Reports ............................................................................................................................... 22 4.3 Utility Allowance Source Document ....................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 5 – Compliance Inspections .............................................. 23 5.1 Physical Inspections ................................................................................................................................ 23 5.2 Review of Tenant Files and Property Records......................................................................................... 23 Chapter 6 – Correction and Consequences of Non-Compliance ....... 24 6.1 Notice to Owner/Agent .......................................................................................................................... 24 6.2 Correction Period.................................................................................................................................... 24 6.3 Owner’s/Agent’s Response ..................................................................................................................... 24 Chapter 7 – Requests for Action .................................................... 25 7.01 Sale or Transfer ...................................................................................................................................... 25 4 Introduction to the Affordable Multi-Family Housing Program (AHP) Properties developed using financing from the City of Edina, or because of our policy for New Multi-Family Affordable Housing, are subject to specific rules designed to ensure that affordability pledges made by owners and developers remain available to very low and low income tenants (30% to 60% of Area Median Income) throughout the required Period of Affordability (the POA). This Guide is designed to assist owners and their agents with planning and maintaining compliance with the local requirements associated with these rental properties that include affordable units. This guide does not pertain to the Market Rate units. It is the responsibility of City of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (hereafter the “HRA”) to monitor the continuing compliance of affordable units in accordance with local policy and governing agreements throughout the POA. The following procedures apply to all rental properties that received funds or a Planned Unit Development (PUD) under the local policy on New Multi-Family Affordable Housing (AHP). Any violation of the AHP requirements could constitute a covenant default of the governing agreement(s) and imposition of all local government rights and remedies. While successful operation of an affordable property is management intensive, the owner/agent is responsible for ensuring that the governing agreement requirements are properly administered. Thorough understanding of requirements and compliance monitoring procedures requires training of owners/agents. The owner/agent should ensure that it knows and understands the requirements of the affordable housing policy and the compliance requirements since failure to comply may have very serious consequences. The HRA recommends that owners, management agents and site managers (collectively referred to as “owner/agent” throughout this document) receive compliance training before certifying or leasing any affordable units. At a minimum, training should cover key compliance terms, determination of rents, household eligibility, file documentation, procedures for maintaining the required unit mix and reporting. Record retention and property condition standards are also key to maintaining compliance. Attending educational opportunities as offered is strongly recommended to keep up with any procedural changes to the AHP. Should the AHP assisted property also receive an allocation of Section 42 tax credits (Low Income Housing Tax Credits or LIHTC), and the property is found to be compliant with the tax credit program, then the HRA will consider the property compliant with the AHP. Owners/Agents of AHP assisted properties must annually certify to the HRA that the property is compliant with the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. The HRA’s determination to monitor the project for compliance with requirements of the AHP does not make it liable for an owner’s/agent's noncompliance. This Guide will be made available to the owner/agent at project financial closing and will be posted on the City’s website. The HRA, in its sole discretion, may delegate its compliance reporting and monitoring responsibilities to a third-party. AHP assisted properties will have a compliance review of all assisted units at initial lease up and every third (3rd) year thereafter. However, the HRA reserves the right to conduct a compliance review annually. Annual reviews may be conducted for new move-ins at turnover. During the compliance review, the HRA or third-party monitoring agent, will ensure compliance against City Agreements by inspecting records of residential student status, income and asset documentation, and rent record for each resident household for all project’s AHP assisted units. The first review for new projects will occur no later than the end of the second year of the period of affordability. 5 Chapter 1 – Overview of Affordable Housing Program Policy The following is an overview the Affordable Housing Policy. It is not intended to be detailed or comprehensive. The requirements of the AHP apply to market rate residential developments that receive a PUD approval from the City of Edina and/or financial assistance from the HRA. This includes new developments and mixed-used developments that create twenty (20) or more multi-family dwelling units and/or any change in use of all or part of an existing building from a non-residential use to a residential use that includes at least twenty (20) dwelling units. 1.1 Period of Affordability (POA) Affordable units created under the Affordable Housing Policy (AHP) are rent and income controlled for a minimum of 20 years with a maximum established by the funding source and reflected in the binding agreement. This term is referred to as the Period of Affordability or POA. Owners/agents should refer to the property’s governing agreements, at project commitment, to determine the specific terms and conditions that govern the property, as the affordability period was increased from 15 years to 20 years in March 2019. Project Commitment is a schedule of commitments within the project’s Financing Agreement(s) between the parties hereto, such as the authorizing Resolution, Development Agreement and/or Loan Documents, dated as of the Execution Date and their related agreements. 1.2 Affordable Dwelling Units (ADUs) At least ten percent (10%) to twenty percent (20%) of the total number of dwelling units in a development receiving a PUD and/or assisted with local funds under the AHP will be designated as Affordable Dwelling Units (ADUs). The percentage applied is based on the affordability standard of the development. Affordability Standards – Rental Projects If an AHP property also is assisted with Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), the AHP Affordability Standard is based on the LIHTC election (Income Averaging, 20/50 or 40/60 set aside). If an AHP property is NOT assisted with LIHTC, then the HRA together with the owner will determine which affordability standard applies. The legal document executed with the HRA determines the standard. 10% at 50%: At least ten percent (10%) of total units developed shall be occupied by households at or below fifty percent (50%) of the MTSP (Multifamily Tax Subsidy Income Limits, i.e., tax credit income limits). 20% at 60%: At least twenty percent (20%) of total units developed shall be occupied by households at or below sixty percent (60%) of the MTSP. Affordability Standards – For Sale Projects At least ten percent (10%) of total units developed shall be affordable for households as follows: 1-2 person household $100,000* 3+ person household $115,000* *Adjusted annually by Minnesota Housing as posted on their website. 6 1.3 Student Households AHP adopted the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program restrictions on student participation found at 24 CFR 5.612 and excludes any individual that: 1. Is enrolled in a higher education institution; AND 2. Is under the age of 24; and 3. Is not a veteran of the US Military; and 4. Is not married*; and 5. Does not have a dependent child(ren); and 6. Is not a person with disabilities; and 7. Is not otherwise individually eligible, or has parents who, individually or jointly, are not eligible on the basis of income * Effective August 1, 2013, same-sex marriages are recognized as marriages for student eligibility purposes. 1.4 New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Rent Limits Every ADU is subject to maximum allowable rents based on bedroom size for the area in which the property is located. These maximum rents are referred to as the AHP rents. These limits represent the maximum that owners/agents can charge for rent, including an allowance for tenant paid utilities, and other non-optional charges (i.e., parking, required renter’s insurance, etc.). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development annually publishes median income amounts for all Minnesota counties. Minnesota Housing uses these amounts to calculate the maximum allowable rents and tenant incomes. Minnesota Housing publishes the LIHTC income and rent limits tables on its website and notifies owners/agents of the updated limits as they become available. According to AHP, the date the final Certificate of Occupancy is issued to a building will determine which rent and income limits table the project uses. The HRA will notify owner/agent of published limits and will provide guidance on limits table to be used by the project. To avoid noncompliance, be sure you are using the correct limits table. In the event AHP rent limits decrease for an area, or utility allowances increase, an owner/agent may be required to reduce the rent charged but will not be required to lower rents below those in effect at the time when the Development Agreement was signed by the City. 1.5 Rental Assistance Tenant Based Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers: Tenants receiving rental assistance, including Section 8 subsidy, must not be refused tenancy in an ADU based solely on the fact that they receive rental assistance. For eligibility purposes, the tenant selection plan must indicate that household income does not need to equal at least two times the unit rent (or any variation thereof) as long as the published Payment Standard subsidy can cover the project’s intended rent. The HRA annually publishes Payment Standards (a rent limit for using a Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher). Payment standards are set by each housing authority. They differ for bedroom size and property location. Project Based Rental Assistance: If rental assistance is project based, ADUs may be allowed to collect a contract rent that exceeds the applicable rent limit if certain conditions are met; the household’s annual income is at or below 50% AMI AND the total housing payment (tenant portion + UA + non-optional charges) is no more than 30% of its monthly adjusted income. 7 1.6 Allowable Fees and Charges Fees considered reasonable and customary may be charged, such as application fee, if such fees are customary for rental housing in the neighborhood. Fees for parking or services such as bus transportation or meals can only be charged if the services are voluntary and are not a condition of occupancy. An eligible tenant cannot be charged a fee for the owner or manager’s work involved in completing the additional forms or documentation required for the AHP, such as the Resident Income Certification. Down payment fees/rent deposit for the ADU should not exceed one month’s rent. 1.7 Fixed or Floating Affordable Dwelling Units ADUs may be “Fixed” or “Floating” and are designated on a property-by-property basis. The enforcement agreement must contain Fixed or Floating unit designations. Fixed Units – The ADUs are identified by unit number and never change. Development Agreements may outline a specific quantity of bedroom sizes and square footage, including minimum floor space, when considering the placement of ADUs within the project. Units in properties where all units are ADUs automatically are considered fixed. If units throughout a project are not comparable (as defined by the HRA) or are in several scattered sites, the ADU unit designation must be fixed. Floating Units – The ADUs may change over time as long as the total number of ADUs and specific quantity of bedroom sizes or ADU total square footage in the property remains compliant with the original Development Agreement. If a property’s enforcement agreement does not specify floating units, then the units that were initially designated as ADUs at project completion will be used to determine comparable floating units. See Chapter 2, Maintaining the Unit Mix, for more information. 1.8 Rent Increases If ADU rents remain below the maximum allowed, an owner/agent may impose a rent increase as allowed by the enforcement agreement no earlier than one year from the date the project started its restriction period (date the building Certificate of Occupancy was issued) and no more frequently than once a year thereafter. If an owner/agent wishes to increase rents, the request must be within reasonable limits to cover increases in expenses such as real estate taxes or operating expenses. At no time can proposed rent increases exceed the current MTSP (LIHTC rents) rent limits for that development. If the owner/agent increases rents as provided above, tenants must be given a written notice 90 days in advance or in accordance with lease provisions before implementation. 1.9 Utility Allowances The AHP requires that an allowance for tenant paid utilities be considered as a housing cost to the tenant and be factored in when determining rent for an ADU. The HRA approved the use of Metro HRA’s Utility Allowance Schedule (effective 2/1/18 and amended annually) as the document to use to determine an ADU’s utility allowance. Utility allowance schedules are usually updated annually. It is the owner’s/agent’s responsibility to obtain an updated utility allowance and retain it in the property records. Changes in utility allowances must be implemented within 90 days of the publication effective date. If an increase in the utility allowance causes the ADU rent to exceed the applicable AHP rent limit, the unit rent must be adjusted (lowered) to bring the gross rent of the unit into compliance with the AHP rent limits. However, at no time will the ADU rent be adjusted to an amount lower than the ADU rent in place at project commitment. 8 An alternative estimate for utility payments may be used, as allowed by Section 42 and approved by the City. Utility allowance methodology change requests and all supporting documentation must be emailed to the Affordable Housing Development Manager at the City for approval. Requests for a change in the property's established utility allowance methodology, to one of the approved utility allowance methodologies should reflect savings from energy efficiency improvements in a manner that is fair to tenants, financially feasible for owners and reduces long-term public subsidy expenditures. General Submission Requirements Each request for a change in utility allowance methodology must include: 1. Cover letter with the current utility allowance and proposed utility methodology 2. A current utility allowance schedule (i.e. local Metro HRA Utility chart) completed with tenant paid utilities 3. Copy of 90-day Notice to the resident including new Utility Allowance and Tenant Rent 4. Utility Allowance Certification, signed and dated 5. Supporting documentation as required (estimate from a properly licensed engineer for example) Allowable Utility Allowance Methodologies The property owner may request to use one or more of the following utility allowance methodologies that meets the AHP requirements. If the project has multiple funding sources, the rents must comply with the program gross rent limits for each program. If the project also has Section 8 Project Based Assistance, the PBA administrator determines the UA schedule for the unit. 1. PHA Utility Method: The local PHA utility allowance for the voucher program. This is the typical current method of establishing Utility Allowances used by most Section 42 LIHTC projects. Owners may request consideration of a different utility allowance methodology from the following alternatives: 2. HUD Utility Schedule Model (HUSM): An estimate calculated via HUD’s online Utility Schedule Model, using recent utility rates. The HUSM enables users to calculate utility schedules using a project specific methodology by entering the property housing type, and utility rate information (tariffs) for the property location. This model is based on climate and survey information from the U. S. Energy Information Administration of the Department of Energy and it incorporates energy efficiency and Energy Star data. The HUSM (web based and Excel format) and use instructions can be accessed on HUD’s Website. 3. Utility Company Estimate (UCE): An estimate from a local utility company providing the estimated cost of utilities for a unit of similar size and construction for the project or from the geographic area where the project is located. 4. Energy Consumption or Engineered Model (ECM): An estimate from a properly licensed engineer, or qualified professional, using an energy consumption model that takes into account the unit size, building orientation, design and materials, mechanical systems, appliances and characteristics of the building location. If the ECM report is completed by a qualified professional that is not a properly licensed engineer, the request must include additional information to support the qualifications and experience of the qualified professional in providing energy consumption utility allowance reports. The engineer or qualified professional must be licensed in Minnesota. If the property is regulated by HUD, or another form of project-based subsidy, the program-approved utility allowance may be used. 9 1.10 Record Retention Owners/agents must retain each household’s initial application forms including household income and asset documentation and lease and leasing agreements/addenda for three (3) years after the tenant’s move out effective date. Owners/agents must maintain applicant and tenant information in a way to ensure confidentiality. Any applicant or tenant affected by negligent disclosure or improper use of information may bring a civil action for damages against the owner/agent and seek other relief, as appropriate. Owners/agents must dispose of records in a manner that will prevent any unauthorized access to personal information, e.g., burn, pulverize, shred, etc. 1.11 Leases Each lease must include the legal name(s) of the parties to the agreement and all other occupants, a description of the unit to be rented (address), the term of the lease, the rental amount, the use of the premises, and the rights and obligations of each party. The lease shall also inform the tenant that fraudulent statements and information are grounds for eviction and that the tenant could become subject to penalties available under federal law. Initial leases for ADUs must be for 12 months unless another term is agreed to mutually by owner/agent and tenant. If tenant agrees to a shorter term, that agreement must be in writing and kept in the tenant’s file. At no time can a lease term be for less than 30 days. ADU leases must contain language that the owner/agent reserves the right to adjust tenant rents in accordance with the AHP rent limits and/or in the event a tenant’s income increases above the income limits of the AHP. The lease also must contain a provision that the owner/agent retains the right to recertify the tenant’s income and household composition on an annual basis. The tenant’s failure to cooperate with the annual recertification constitutes a violation of the lease. If the lease used for the ADU unit does not contain any of the required provisions and/or contains any prohibited provisions, an AHP Lease Addendum must be signed by the tenant and kept in the tenant’s file. If a new lease is executed, a new AHP Lease Addendum also must be executed. Prohibited lease terms are defined in the AHP Lease Addendum. Owner/Agent may not evict or terminate resident (including refusal to renew a lease) without good cause. Good cause is (a) serious or repeated violation(s) of the material terms and conditions of the Resident Lease. Use of the AHP Lease Addendum including the AHP Lease Rider outlining provisions on evictions and terminations is mandatory. During the final year of the POA, new leases for the Affordable Units must be for a term of no less than six months, and such newly leased Affordable Units will be subject to all the Affordable Housing Requirements until the expiration of such new leases. An AHP Lease Addendum is not required when the HUD model lease for subsidized housing is used. 10 1.12 Income Certification The owner/agent must verify and certify tenant income eligibility and student status at move in and recertify at least annually thereafter. At initial move in, or when first being determined eligible for an ADU and in every 3rd year of the affordability period (not tenancy), household composition, income and income from assets must be verified via third- party verification or other forms of supporting documentation and kept in the tenant’s file. In other years, tenants must, at a minimum, self-certify to their anticipated income (including income from assets), family size, and composition. As part of the monitoring process, all tenant files will be reviewed at initial occupancy of the project and every 3rd year thereafter. In between, ADU tenant files shall be reviewed for initial tenancy and/or unit turnover or when requested by the City. 1.13 Increases in Income The owner/agent must ensure that any household whose anticipated gross income exceeds 140% of the maximum income limit at recertification pays not less than the market or similar rent as the other non-ADUs in the development. A minimum notice of 60 days is required for increases to tenant rent. The unit must be marketed to eligible tenants when vacated. If the units are floating, the rent is increased, and the next available unit must be rented at affordable rates to an income eligible tenant. Conversely, the tenant whose income increase to above 140% of AMI could be relocated to a Market Rate unit if the affordable units are fixed. For units assisted with both AHP funds and Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), a tenant is not considered over income until income exceeds the applicable 140% LIHTC limit. When a tenant’s income exceeds the 140% LIHTC limit, the tenant’s rent is adjusted to the LIHTC rent limit if the project is 100% LIHTC or, if the project is mixed income, to the market rent for similar non-ADUs in the property. 1.14 Property Standards The owner/agent must keep all units in compliance with local codes and other applicable state and local building codes to ensure the units are decent, safe, and sanitary at all times. 1.15 Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan Owners/agents must adhere to Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Marketing, and Fair Housing practices in all marketing efforts, eligibility determinations and other transactions. The Equal Housing Opportunity logo or statement must be used in all advertising of vacant units (We do business in accordance with the Federal Fair Housing Law. It is illegal to discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin). In addition to the federal protections mentioned above, the Minnesota Human Rights Act makes it illegal to discriminate against any person with respect to housing and real property, because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, sexual orientation or familial status. A file must be maintained with all marketing efforts related to the property including newspaper ads, social service contacts, photos of signs posted, etc. Records will be reviewed during on site monitoring to ensure that all efforts follow federal requirements and are being adequately documented. 1.16 Fair Lease and Grievance Procedures Fair lease and grievance procedures should be objective. They should clearly state: • To whom a tenant should direct a complaint; • Who will investigate and/or respond to the complaint; and • By when the tenant should expect to receive a response. 11 Chapter 2 – Maintaining the Unit Mix 2.1 Fixed Affordable Dwelling Units Properties with units that are not comparable in terms of size, amenities and features must have Fixed ADUs. Fixed ADUs means specific units are designated as the ADUs for the duration of the affordability period. Owner/Agent must maintain these specific units as the ADUs. Maintaining the required number of ADUs, is called complying with the unit mix requirements. At no time will non-ADUs be subject to AHP rent and income requirements when the ADUs are fixed. When an owner/agent recertifies a tenant’s income, the tenant’s income may have increased. A tenant is considered “over income” in the AHP when: • The tenant occupies an ADU and the tenant income increases to 140% of the current income limit for that family size; or • For ADUs that are also LIHTC units, a tenant is considered “over income” when its income goes over 140% of the qualifying tax credit election (Average Income, 50% or 60%) for that unit. When a tenant is over income, the unit that the tenant occupies is considered temporarily out of compliance with the AHP’s occupancy and unit mix requirements. Temporary noncompliance due to an increase in an existing tenant’s income is permissible if the owner/agent takes specific steps to restore the correct unit mix in the property as soon as possible. When the tenant’s income exceeds the AHP’s income limit (140%), the unit rent also must be adjusted. The owner/agent cannot terminate the lease immediately if the tenant’s income has increased above the AHP income limit. Instead, the owner/agent may extend /renew the lease for up to six months. If the tenant remains over income at the time of the next recertification, a 60-day notice to vacate may be issued to the tenant. If the tenant is determined to be under the AHP income limit at the time of recertification, the unit is considered back in compliance. 2.2 Floating Affordable Dwelling Units Properties with units that are comparable in terms of size, amenities and features can have Floating ADUs. Properties with floating ADUs must maintain the required number of ADUs throughout the POA; however, the initial ADUs do not have to remain as ADUs throughout the POA. When ADUs float, the specific units that carry the ADU designation may change, or float, among assisted and non-assisted units during the POA. If/when an initial ADU goes out of compliance due to a tenant’s income going over the AHP (or LIHTC) income limit, a non-ADU can replace the out of compliance ADU if the tenant income and unit rent of the non- ADU meet the ADU requirements. In other words, the ADU designation “floats” to another unit. For example, if a property has an over-income tenant in an ADU, when the next non-ADU comparable unit becomes available, it will be designated as an ADU and rented to an income eligible tenant. The unit occupied by the over income tenant is redesignated as a market rate unit. Maintaining the required number of comparable ADUs is called complying with the unit mix requirements. 12 When recertifying a tenant’s income, an owner/agent may find that the tenant’s income has increased. A tenant is considered “over income” when: • The tenant occupies an ADU and the tenant income increases over the current AHP income limit (140% AMI) for that family size; or • In ADUs that are also LIHTC units, a tenant is considered “over income” when its income increases to 140% or more of the qualifying tax credit election (50% or 60%) for that unit. When a tenant is over income, the unit that the tenant occupies is considered temporarily out of compliance with the AHP’s unit mix requirements. Temporary noncompliance due to an increase in an existing tenant’s income is permissible if the owner/agent takes specific steps to restore the required unit mix in the property. The rents of the over income tenants can be adjusted. When redesignating units in a property with floating ADUs, owner/agent can choose to substitute a unit that is equal or “greater” than the original ADU, but generally they cannot substitute one that is “lesser”. A lesser unit can be substituted only when doing so preserves the original unit mix. A greater unit is one that might be considered preferable because of larger size or additional bedrooms. The goal is to maintain the same number and type of ADUs as were designated originally. Therefore, if an owner/agent makes a substitution that is “greater,” it later can substitute an available unit that is “lesser” to restore the original unit mix. Once a comparable non-ADU unit is designated as the new ADU, the unit with the over income tenant is redesignated as a non-ADU or market rate unit. At this point, the owner/agent may adjust the tenant’s rent without regard to the AHP rent requirements (although requirements from other funding sources still may apply). Rent increases are subject to the terms of the lease. Note, a tenant in a floating ADU whose income exceeds AHP income limit is not required to pay more than the market rent for a comparable, unassisted unit in the property. The owner/agent cannot terminate the lease based on the tenant’s increase in income. 13 Chapter 3 – General Occupancy Guidelines 3.1 Qualification of Applicants Applicants for ADUs shall be advised early in their initial visit to the property that there are maximum income limits that apply to these units. They also will be made aware that the anticipated income of all persons expecting to occupy the unit must be verified and included on a Resident Income Certification form prior to occupancy, and that tenant income and student status will be reviewed annually. If an individual is enrolled as a student at an institution of higher education, is under the age of 24, is not a veteran, is not married, is not a person with disabilities, and does not have a dependent child, in order to be eligible for a ADU, the student must be individually income eligible and the student’s parents (the parents individually or jointly) must be income eligible unless the student can demonstrate his or her independence from parents. AHP has adopted the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program restrictions on student participation found at 24 CFR 5.612, which exclude any student that: 1. Is enrolled in a higher education institution. 2. Is under the age of 24. 3. Is not a veteran of the US Military. 4. Is not married**. 5. Does not have a dependent child(ren). 6. Is not a person with disabilities. 7. Is not otherwise individually eligible, or has parents who, individually or jointly, are not eligible on the basis of income. **Effective August 23, 2013, same-sex marriages are recognized as marriages for student eligibility purposes. To determine a student’s independence from his or her parents, the owner should consider all of the following: 1. The individual must be of legal contract age under state law; and 2. The individual must have established a household separate from parents or legal guardians for at least one year prior to application for occupancy, or the individual must meet the U.S. Department of Education’s definition of an independent student; and 3. The individual must not be claimed as a dependent by parents or legal guardians pursuant to IRS regulations; and 4. The individual must obtain a certification of the amount of financial assistance that will be provided by parents, signed by the individual/s providing the support. This certification is required even if no assistance will be provided. To document a student’s independence from parents: 1. Review and verify previous address information to determine evidence of a separate household, or verify the student meets the U.S. Department of Education’s definition of “independent student”; and 2. Review prior year income tax returns to verify if a parent or guardian has claimed the student as a dependent (except if the student meets the Department of Education’s definition of “independent student”); and 3. Verify income provided by a parent by requiring a written certification from the individual providing the support. Certification is also required if the parent/s is providing no support to the student. Financial assistance that is provided by persons not living in the unit is part of annual income. Verification of student eligibility must be maintained in the tenant file along with the income certification. 14 3.2 Eligibility Determination A fully completed Household Questionnaire is critical to an accurate determination of eligibility. The information furnished on the application should be used as a tool to determine all sources of anticipated income and assets. After the tenant completes the Household Questionnaire, the owner/agent must have all income verified by obtaining source documentation (award letters, offers of employment, W- 2’s, check stubs (not paycheck), bank statements, investment records, etc.) or by a third-party (public agency, employer, financial institution). If total cash value of assets is less than $50,000, assets can be self-certified using the Under $50,000 Certification. Assets exceeding $50,000 must be third-party verified. The application, income and asset verifications, and lease are to be executed prior to move in. All occupants in an ADU must be certified and have a valid lease on file. All household members age 18 and over must sign all required documents. 3.3 Change in Household Composition If a tenant in an ADU (no LIHTC) wishes to have an additional person move into the unit within the first 6 months of occupancy, the following steps must be taken: 1. The prospective tenant must complete a Household Questionnaire and allow time for verification of income and assets as required of the initial tenant; and 2. The prospective tenant's income must be added to the current tenant's certification and a determination made as to whether the new household is still within the AHP income guidelines. If the new household income exceeds the guidelines, then once proper notice is given, the tenant must pay the market rate. If the ADU is floating, the ADU designation must be floated to another eligible unit. The new rent of the now over income household cannot exceed market rent for a comparable unassisted unit. The tenant file shall also be documented when any household member vacates the unit. 3.4 Minimum Lease Requirements Initial tenant leases, including a signed and dated AHP lease addendum (if applicable), must be on file and must specify a term of at least 12 months. Subsequent leases may have a shorter term, with written mutual agreement. Leases must not contain any of the prohibited lease terms. Any non-renewal or termination of leases must be in accordance with the lease and/or AHP lease addendum. Owners/agents must comply with the lease requirements found in Section 601 of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA) of 2013. HRA highly encourages owners/agents to use the VAWA Lease Addendum, form HUD-91067 or its successor VAWA Lease Addendum form. In general, owner/agent may not construe an incident of actual or threatened domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking as a serious or repeated violation of a lease term by the victim, or threatened victim, as good cause for terminating tenancy. However, in accordance with VAWA 2013, owner/agent may bifurcate a lease to terminate the tenancy of an individual who is a tenant or lawful occupant and engages in criminal activity directly relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking against another lawful occupant living in the unit or other affiliated individual as defined in the VAWA 2013. Owner/Agent should include a copy of HUD-5382 form with each tenancy termination or eviction notice to allow an individual to certify that he or she is a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking. The form is to be completed and submitted to owner/agent within 14 business days or an agreed upon extension date for the individual to receive protection under the VAWA. 15 3.5 House Rules Developing a set of house rules is a good practice. The decision about whether to develop house rules for a property rests solely with the owner/agent. If house rules are listed in the lease as an attachment, then they must be attached to the lease. By identifying allowable and prohibited activities in housing units and common areas, the owner/agent provides a structure for treating tenants equitably and for making sure tenants treat each other with consideration. House rules also are beneficial in keeping properties safe and clean and making them more appealing and livable for the tenants. They also are extremely beneficial if it becomes necessary to evict a tenant for inappropriate behavior. For more information on House Rules, refer to Chapter 6-9 of the HUD 4350.3 REV 1, Change 4 Handbook. 3.6 Number of Persons Per Unit There is no federal regulation governing the number of persons allowed to occupy a unit based on size; however, at initial occupancy ADUs will have a minimum requirement of at least one person per bedroom. It is important, though, to be consistent when accepting or rejecting applications. It is required that the owner/agent determine the minimum and maximum number of people that will be allowed to occupy each size unit and put that formula in writing as part of the Tenant Selection Plan and submit the Plan to the HRA or designated agent for approval. The owner/agent may refer to the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV 1, Change 4, Chapter 3-23, regarding occupancy standards. By following the standards described, owners/agents can ensure that applicants and tenants are housed in appropriately sized units in a fair and consistent manner. 3.7 Tenant Selection Plan Owner/Agent must develop a formal written policy that clearly states the procedures and criteria the owner/agent will consistently apply in drawing applicants from the waiting list, screening for suitability for tenancy, and implementing income targeting requirements. The Tenant Selection Plan must state if there is an elderly restriction (“seniors only” building). In accordance with the VAWA of 2013, the selection criteria cannot deny admission on the basis that the applicant has been a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking. Owner/Agent should provide to each applicant/tenant HUD form 5382or its successor form to allow the applicant/tenant to provide information regarding his or her status as a victim of domestic violence, dating violence or stalking. Owners/agents may refer to the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV 1, Change 4, Chapter 4, when developing a tenant selection plan. HRA will review the Tenant Selection Plan as part of its monitoring process. 3.8 Government Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement Form In working with applicants and tenants, the owner/agent warrants compliance with applicable data privacy laws and regulations including the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, which sets policies on the information that can be obtained, stored and/or released in connection with public programs. To comply with this law, the AHP Government Data Practices Act Statement form must be kept in each tenant's permanent file. Note that this is not a release authorization for verification of income and assets and must not be used as such. Each adult household member’s name must be printed clearly at the top in the box provided. An unsigned and/or undated form is not valid and will be noted as insufficient at time of file inspection. 1. The form is to be signed one time and is valid as long as the resident lives at the property and participates in the program(s) identified in item #2 on page 1 of the form. If a resident moves from one unit to another, the original signed and dated form should be moved to the file for the new unit. A copy should be kept in the move out file for the old unit. 2. A valid form must include all relevant attachments. Some properties or units within a property may require 2 or more attachments for multiple programs. 16 3. Only one form is needed per unit as long as the head of household, spouse, co-head, and all household members over the age of 18 have signed and dated the form. 4. If an adult is added to the household or a minor reaches age 18, they must be added to, sign, and date the original form. It is not necessary to complete a new form. 5. A copy of the form should be made available to the applicant/tenant. It is acceptable to give them an unsigned copy. 6. For new residents, the form should be completed at the time of initial application. A Government Data Practices Act Disclosure form that can be used for all ADUs is available on the HRA website. 3.9 Income Verification At initial occupancy, owner/agent must determine whether prospective tenant(s) of ADUs qualify as low income households. Income eligibility is based on anticipated income as defined at 24 CFR 5.609 (Section 8). When collecting income verification documentation, owner/agent must consider any likely changes in income. Owner/Agent must follow appropriate steps in determining whether households are eligible prior to admittance. Minnesota Housing provides sample verifications and other forms to assist owners/agents in qualifying eligible tenants. The release of information (at top of form) must be completed and signed by the person who is the subject of the verification prior to sending the form to an employer or other income source. Completed and returned verifications are used to calculate and document income. An Income and Asset Calculation Worksheet form also is available and can be used to assist in showing the individual calculations of income and asset income. This is highly recommended and will assist an inspector during a file review. This form should be dated and signed by the owner/agent. 3.10 Gross Annual Household Income Gross annual income for households living in ADUs shall be determined in a manner consistent with Section 8 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, also known as Part 5 Definition of Income. Note that the information below only provides a summary. Owners and managers must use current circumstances to project income, unless verification forms or other verifiable documentation indicate that an imminent change will occur. For guidance in this section and in determination of tenant income, the HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs, is used and is recommended as a reference guide. The HUD Handbook 4350.3 and HUD notices can be obtained by visiting HUD’s website. The determination of annual income must include all types of income in the amount anticipated to be received by the tenant in the 12 months following certification/recertification. Owner/Agent should use current circumstances to project income, unless verification forms or other verifiable documentation indicate that a change will occur (increase/decrease in rate of pay and/or hours). However, if the owner/agent is unable to determine annual income using current information because the family reports little to no income, or because income fluctuates, the owner/agent may average past actual income received or earned within the last 12 months before the certification date to calculate annual income. 17 3.11 Factors that Affect Household Size When determining family size for occupancy, the owner/agent must include the following individuals who currently are not living in the unit: • Children temporarily absent due to placement in a foster home; • Children in joint custody arrangements who are present in the household 50% or more of the time; • Children who are away at school but who live with the family during school recesses; • Unborn children of pregnant women. When a pregnant woman is an applicant, the unborn child is included in the size of the household and is included for purposes of determining the maximum allowable income. The rental application should ask the following question: “Will there be any changes in household composition within the next 12-month period?” If an applicant answers that a child is expected (birth, foster or adoption), the owner/agent should explain to the applicant this is an additional household member and use the corresponding income limit, and self-certification of additional member should be used as documentation within the initial certification. • Children who are in the process of being adopted; • Temporarily absent family members who still are considered family members. For example, the owner/agent may consider a family member who is working in another state on assignment to be temporarily absent. Persons on active military duty are considered temporarily absent (except if the person is not the head, co-head or spouse or has no dependents living in the unit). If the person on active military duty is the head, co-head, or spouse, or if the spouse or dependents of the person on active military duty resides in the unit, that person’s income must be counted in full; • Family members in the hospital or rehabilitation facility for periods of limited or fixed duration. These persons are temporarily absent as defined above. Persons permanently confined to a hospital or nursing home are not considered household members. When determining family size for establishing income eligibility, the owner/agent must include all persons living in the unit except the following: • Live-in aides • Children of live-in aides A live-in aide/attendant is a person who resides with one or more elderly persons, near-elderly persons, or persons with disabilities, and who: • Is determined to be essential to the care and well-being of the person(s); • Is not obligated for the support of the person(s); and • Would not be living in the unit except to provide the necessary supportive services. While a relative may be a live-in aide/attendant, s/he must meet the above requirements, especially the last. The live- in aide qualifies for occupancy only if the individual needing supportive services requires the aide’s services and remains a tenant. The live-in aide may not qualify for continued occupancy as a remaining family member. The owner/agent must obtain verification from the person’s physician, psychiatrist or other medical practitioner or health care provider that the live-in aide is needed to provide the necessary supportive services essential to the care and well-being of the person and should not add the attendant to the lease. The owner/agent may not require applicants or tenants to provide access to confidential medical records or to submit to a physical examination. Some households may include other persons who are considered family members for the purposes of determining household size and income eligibility, including: • Foster adults • Foster children Chapter 5 of HUD’s Occupancy Handbook has more detail on whose income is counted, what is counted as income and 18 what is not, and how to account for income generated by assets. 3.12 General Income Verification Requirements All income and asset sources must be disclosed on the eligibility application and verified. A properly completed application must be used as the basis for determining what verifications will be necessary. The application, along with all supporting documentation and the Resident Income Certification, will be reviewed by HRA staff or its agent during a tenant file review. The following describes the types of third-party verification in order of acceptability: 1. Third-party verification from source (written): An original or authentic document generated by a third-party source that is dated within six months from the date of receipt by the owner/agent. Documents may be in possession of the tenant (or applicant), and commonly are referred to as tenant provided documents. These documents are considered third-party verification because they originated from a third-party source. Examples of tenant provided documentation that may be used include, but are not limited to paystubs, payroll summary report, employer notice/letter of hire/termination, SSA benefit letter, bank statements, child support payment stubs, welfare benefit letters and/or printouts, and unemployment monetary benefit notices. Owner/Agent must consider the following when using tenant provided documentation: i. Is the document current? Documentation of public assistance may be inaccurate if it is not recent and does not show any changes in the family’s benefits or work and training activities. ii. Is the documentation complete? Owner/Agent may accept pay stubs to document employment income only if the applicant or tenant provides the most recent two months of consecutive pay stubs to illustrate variations in hours worked. Actual paychecks or copies of paychecks should never be used to document income because deductions are not shown on the paycheck. iii. Is the document an unaltered original? The greatest shortcoming of tenant provided documents as a verification source is their susceptibility to undetectable change through the use of high quality copying equipment. Documents with original signatures are the most reliable. Photocopied documents generally cannot be assumed to be reliable. 2. Written documentation sent directly to the third-party source by mail or electronically by fax, email or internet. Verification forms must contain a release authorization signed by the applicant/tenant. Do not use a blanket release authorization as this entitles the owner/agent to obtain information to which it is not entitled or needed for eligibility determination. The Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement is not a verification release. Applicants should be asked to sign two copies of each verification form. The second copy may be used if the first request has not been returned in a timely manner. Income verification requests must be sent directly to and from the source. They are never given to the tenant to obtain signatures. If the returned verifications do not contain complete information, owner/agent must follow up with the source to obtain complete information. Typical examples include failure to indicate interest rates, dates of anticipated raises, amounts of anticipated raises, etc. All pertinent information must be documented in the file and must also include the name, phone number and title of the contact, the name of the person accepting the information, and the date. The single form AHP Eligibility Verification may be used to document income and asset eligibility in lieu of separate verification(s) for each separate income or asset source if the sole source of income is Housing Support. The AHP Eligibility Verification confirms receipt of Housing Support (formally known as GRH) since it identifies that the applicant is in fact qualified for income-based Medical Assistance (MA) through Minnesota’s Department of Human Services. (Housing Support recipients must have MA prior to obtaining housing grant funding). MA eligibility documents AHP eligibility because the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG) are significantly less than the LIHTC income limits. NCCP.org (NCCP.org/tools/converter/) defines poverty as a family income less than 100 percent of the federal poverty 19 threshold, as determined by the U.S. Census Bureau; Low Income is defined as family income less than 200 percent of the poverty threshold. 3. Third-party verification from source (verbal). When clarifying information over the telephone, it is important to be certain that the person on the telephone is the party he or she claims to be. Generally, it is best to telephone the verification source rather than to accept verification from a source calling the property management office. Verbal verification must be documented in the file. When verifying information by phone, the owner/agent must record and include in the tenant’s file the following information: a. Third-party’s name, position, and contact information; b. Information reported by the third-party; c. Name of the person who conducted the telephone interview; and d. Date and time of the telephone call. 4. Self-Certification An owner/agent may accept a tenant’s notarized statement or signed affidavit regarding the veracity of information submitted only if the information cannot be verified by another acceptable verification method. In these instances, the owner/agent must document the file why third-party verification was not available. The owner/agent may witness the tenant signature(s) in lieu of a notarized statement or affidavit. The following describes use of electronic information when used as third-party verification. Electronic Verification. The owner/agent may obtain accurate third-party written verification by facsimile, email, or Internet, if adequate effort is made to ensure that the sender is a valid third-party source. a. Facsimile. Information sent by fax is most reliable if the owner/agent and the verification source agree to use this method in advance during a telephone conversation. The fax should include the company name and fax number of the verification source. b. Email. Similar to faxed information, information verified by email is more reliable when preceded by a telephone conversation and/or when the email address includes the name of an appropriate individual and firm. c. Internet. Information verified on the Internet is considered third-party verification if the owner/agent is able to view web-based information from a reputable source on the computer screen. Use of a printout from the Internet may also be adequate verification in many instances. Steps used to obtain written verification as described in 1, 2 and 3 above must be documented to show just cause for using other types of verification. The owner/agent must include the following documents in the tenant file: 1. A written note explaining why third-party verification is not possible, signed and dated by the applicant/resident. 2. A copy of the date-stamped original request that was sent to the third-party. 3. Written notes or documentation indicating follow up efforts to reach the third-party to obtain verification. 4. A written note indicating the request has been outstanding without a response from the third-party. Note: If a tenant is employed by a business owned by the tenant's family or is employed by the property owner/agent or the management company, a copy of a recent pay stub verifying year- to- date earnings also is required. Upon receipt of all verifications, owner/agent must determine if the resident is qualified for participation in the AHP. All verifications should be reviewed, and calculations made as necessary. 20 3.13 Corrections to Documents Sometimes it is necessary to make corrections or changes to documents. A document that has been altered with correction fluid or "white out" will not be accepted by HRA. When a change is needed on a document, the person making the correction must draw a line through the incorrect information, write or type the correct wording or number, and have all parties initial and date the change. 3.14 Effective Term of Verifications Verifications of any kind are valid for 6 months prior to an ADU tenant’s move in date or recertification date. 3.15 Over Income Households When determining eligibility to occupy an ADU, the household's gross income must always be considered. However, if a tenant goes over the income guidelines of 140% of household income at recertification, the owner/agent must raise the over income tenant’s rent to reflect Fair Market Rent or relocate tenant to a Market Rate Unit as soon as the lease permits in accordance with the terms of the lease (see Chapter 2). The AHP does not require interim rent adjustments. 3.16 Annual Recertification All households occupying an ADU must be recertified at least annually from the date of occupancy. Annual recertifications must be effective on or before the occupancy anniversary date of the previous certification. Owner/Agent may align recertification dates with other program certifications or so that all units in the property are recertified at one time during the year. However, if a period of twelve (12) months passes without a recertification being completed for any ADU, the unit is considered out of compliance. Owner/Management may request an annual schedule whereby all tenants are recertified during the same month however before making changes to schedule, an email request must be made, and approved by the City first. The requirement to recertify is included in an ADU lease or addendum, tenant refusal to comply can be considered a violation of the lease and is grounds for termination. Income must be third-party verified in every 3rd year of the project’s affordability period, not tenancy. Example: Every Third Year Full Certification Property ABC received Certificate of Occupancy on 11/1/2019 • Period of Affordability (POA) for Property ABC will be a total of 15 years starting on 11/1/2019 and ending on 11/1/2034 Amanda Johnson Moved onto Property ABC on 12/1/2019 In 2019 (POA Year One): Management verifies income using SSA Benefits Award Letter, a copy of Amanda’s current PERA Benefit Letter (Pension Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota) and Under $50,000 Asset Verification to determine eligibility at Move In. All items must be third-party verified using source documents. In 2020 (POA Year Two): Amanda Johnson needs to complete her Annual Recertification. In POA Year Two for Property ABC, a self- certification of income and asset, signed by all adult household members is acceptable during this “non-3rd year”. Note: Move In certifications for eligibility must always third-party verify using source documents. In 2021 (POA Year Three): Amanda Johnson needs to complete her Annual Recertification. In POA Year Three for Property ABC, a self-certification of income and asset, signed by all adult household members is acceptable during this “non-3rd year”. Note: Move In certifications for eligibility must always third-party verify using source documents. In 2022 (POA Year Four): The Annual Recertification requirement for this POA year at Property ABC states all income and assets reported by a household must be third-party verified using source documents. A Self-Certification of Income & Asset is not eligible for use for any ADU at Property ABC 3.17 Tenant Files 21 Owner/Agent must maintain a tenant file for each ADU. All permanent documents must be kept together so they are accessible at each compliance review. Annual recertification information must be grouped together by year, with the most recent year on top for review. Tenant records, including income verifications and development rents must be retained for the most recent three-year period after the tenant moves out. Below is a guide for organizing and preparing tenant files for review Income eligibility documents required for review: ☐ Detailed Calculation Worksheet ☐ Household Questionnaire/Tenant Application ☐ Student Eligibility for each year of occupancy ☐ Income Verifications: 3rd party or source documents (required for initial eligibility and every 3rd year of POA) Self-certification (accepted on “off years”, except initial eligibility) ☐ Asset Verifications: 3rd party, source documents (required for initial eligibility and every 3rd year of POA) or Under 50K Cert Self-certification (accepted on “off years”, except initial eligibility) ☐ PHA Verification (alternative annual income total from PHA, not accepted for initial eligibility) ☐ Documentation of phone conversation or clarification ☐ Correct Government Data Practices Act Form Other documents required for review: ☐ Leases: Initial lease and most recently signed by HH ☐ Lease addendum requiring cooperation with annual recertification process ☐ Notice to HH of rent change ☐ Tenant Ledger (with all charges/payments reflected, including rent assistance (subsidy), non-optional lease charges, fees, etc.) ☐ VAWA Addendum ☐ Lead Based Paint (LBP) disclosures and receipt of LBP pamphlet (for pre-1978 projects only) ☐ AHP Resident Notification/Good Cause Rider ☐ Notes to File (if applicable) Correspondence/special circumstances required for review: ☐ If recert was late, file contains copies of recertification notices to HH and related HH response or correspondence. ☐ If unit is vacant, provide most recent recert from previous HH plus documentation of HH's notice to vacate, or owner's notice to HH of non-renewal/termination of lease for good cause. 22 Chapter 4 – Reporting Requirements The owner/agent must maintain a report of all tenants residing in each ADU at the time of application through the end of the affordability period and must submit annual reports to HRA in a form and manner requested by HRA. Annual compliance reports are due to HRA by March 1 or as otherwise specified by HRA, of each year during the affordability period. If the due date falls on a weekend or a holiday, reports are due the following business day. Reports and other required documents must be submitted as directed by HRA on an annual basis. 4.1 Annual Owner/Agent Certifications Complete the Owner/Agent Certification to certify compliance with AHP requirements for the preceding calendar year. Owner/Agent Certifications must be printed, signed and dated by the authorized Owner/Agent Representative, then scanned and submitted as directed by HRA. 4.2 Compliance Reports HRA or designated agents will monitor AHP compliance by reviewing annual Owner/Agent Certifications and analyzing compliance information submitted by the owner/agent. Failure to submit the Owner/Agent Certification and/or update the report on all units and their related activity by the due date will constitute noncompliance with the AHP and the related loan documents. 4.3 Utility Allowance Source Document Owners/Agents must submit the utility allowance source documents applicable to the reporting period. Multiple utility allowance source documents may apply to one reporting period. 23 Chapter 5 – Compliance Inspections Compliance inspections involve annual review of reports for rent and income compliance and review of tenant files as required (move in and/or turnover). For new projects, an initial review of all ADU tenant files shall be done. After initial review, ADU tenant files shall be reviewed for initial tenancy and/or unit turnover or when requested by the City. Limited off-site technical assistance will be provided and owners/managers will be notified of any changes to compliance requirements e.g. updated income and rent limits and updated utility allowances. 5.1 Physical Inspections The Affordable Housing Program does not mandate inspections. The City’s Inspectors will perform building inspections as stipulated in the Rental Licensing requirements. 5.2 Review of Tenant Files and Property Records During the tenant file review, HRA staff will review Resident Income Certifications, third-party verifications or other forms of income documentation, leases, lead based paint disclosure forms, and other management information for selected units. HRA staff will also review the following property information: • Utility Allowances and supporting documentation • Current written tenant selection plan, occupancy policy and/or house rules if changes were made since the last review • Current lease and lease addenda/agreement(s) • Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan/Marketing Plans • Advertising and marketing materials • Equal Housing Opportunity posters, logos • Correspondence • Resident rent ledgers for all units inspected 24 Chapter 6 – Correction and Consequences of Non-Compliance If HRA does not receive the required certifications and/or compliance reports when due, or discovers by audit, inspection, or review, or in some other manner, that the property is not in compliance with the requirements of the AHP, or with the property’s loan documents, including the enforcement agreement, the HRA will notify the owner/agent as soon as possible. 6.1 Notice to Owner/Agent HRA or its designated agent will provide prompt written notice to the owner/agent of an AHP property if HRA does not receive the annual Owner/Agent Certification and income and occupancy report by the required due date. HRA or its designated agent also will notify the owner/agent if it does not receive or is not permitted to inspect the Resident Income Certifications, supporting documentation, and rent records, or discovers by inspection, review, or in some other manner, that the property is not in compliance with the requirements of the AHP or with the property’s loan documents, including the enforcement agreement. 6.2 Correction Period A correction period of 30 days will be set forth in a Notice of Noncompliance to the owner and its agent. HRA may extend the correction period if HRA determines there is good cause for granting the extension. Requests for an extension must be in writing from the owner/agent, must be received by HRA no later than the last day of the correction period identified on the Notice of Noncompliance, and must include an explanation of the efforts to correct the noncompliance and the reason the extension is needed. 6.3 Owner’s/Agent’s Response HRA will review the owner’s/agent’s response and supporting documentation, if any, to determine whether the noncompliance has been clarified, corrected, or remains out of compliance. Clarified noncompliance is, for example, where income eligibility was not properly documented, and during the initial review a reasonable determination of compliance cannot be made. The owner/agent conducts a retroactive (re)certification which completely and clearly documents the sources of income and assets that were in place at the time the certification should have been effective and applies income and rent limits that were in effect on that date. If documentation is complete and supports that the tenant was eligible as of the effective date, the file is considered clarified. Corrected noncompliance is when a violation is observed and there is a period of time during which the unit is out of compliance, but the unit is brought back into compliance. For example, a late certification or re-certification is out of compliance on the certification due date, and back in compliance as of the date the last household member signs a retroactive Income Certification. Uncorrected noncompliance is a violation that is not corrected or clarified by the end of the correction period. Failure to correct all noncompliance could result in extension of the end of the POA, loss of Tax Increment Financing, or LURC tax treatment or other legal remedies. Persistent noncompliance also may impact the owner’s/agent’s eligibility for future financing from the HRA under any or all its programs. 25 Chapter 7 – Requests for Action 7.1 Sale or Transfer Any property owner must provide prior written notice to the HRA before sale or transfer of the property. The notice will provide that the new owner/agent acknowledges that the terms and conditions of the Affordable Housing Program as set forth in the governing documents recorded against the property remain in place. L-1 4876-1524-2800\3 Exhibit L Form of Housing Restrictive Covenant DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS (Affordable Housing) THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS (this “Declaration”) is made as of the _____ day of ______________, 20___, by 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Declarant”). Recitals A. Declarant is the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, located at 4620 W. 77th Street and legally described in the attached Exhibit A (the “Property”). B. Declarant; the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); and the City of Edina Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”) are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated _______________, 2022 (as the same may be amended, modified, and/or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”). C. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the redevelopment of the Property by Declarant with the cooperation and assistance of the Authority and the City and provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in such redevelopment of the Property and construction of certain improvements thereon, including 276 rental housing units (the “Project”). D. The City, by Resolution No. 2022-92, dated October 6, 2022, approved Declarant’s final rezoning, planned unit development ordinance, and final development plan for the Project. E. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement, Declarant has agreed to impose certain restrictive covenants upon the Property to ensure that at least 28 of the housing units within the Project will be leased at rates considered affordable to certain individuals or households whose gross annual income does not exceed 50% of the area median income, as more particularly described herein (the “Affordable Units”). F. In addition to the Affordable Units, pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement, Declarant has agreed to impose restrictive covenants upon the Property to ensure that at least 110 of the housing units within the Project will be leased at rates considered affordable to certain individuals or households whose gross annual income does not exceed 120% of the area median income, as more particularly described herein (the “Workforce Units”). G. Declarant, under this Declaration, intends, declares, and covenants that the restrictive covenants set forth herein governing the use, occupancy, and transfer of the Project shall be and are covenants running with the Property for the Term stated herein and binding upon all subsequent owners of the Property for such Term, and are not merely personal covenants of Declarant. L-2 4876-1524-2800\3 NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes the following Declaration, hereby specifying that said Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties in interest and their respective successors and assigns: 1. Recitals; Definitions. The Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Declaration by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. Each capitalized term used herein and the Recitals, unless otherwise defined, shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such term in the Redevelopment Agreement. 2. Term; Termination. (a) Generally. Subject to the terms and conditions of Sections 2(b) and 2(c) below, this Declaration, and the covenants and restrictions contained herein, shall continue in full force and effect for a period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the 20-year anniversary of the date that all Affordable Units are first occupied by Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants (defined below) (the “Term”). Without the execution or recording of any additional documents, this Declaration shall automatically cease to be of any force or effect upon the expiration of the Term. Declarant’s obligation to operate the Project subject to this Declaration for the Term is independent of the existence and continuance of any tax increment financing and/or other public assistance contemplated or given by the Authority or the City to Declarant under the Redevelopment Agreement, or otherwise (“Public Assistance”). Except as otherwise provided herein, the provisions of this Declaration are intended to survive the termination or extinguishment of any Public Assistance, any mortgage securing the same, and any other security instruments placed of record in connection with the Public Assistance and to survive the termination of any subsequent financing or security instruments placed of record by other lenders. (b) Earlier Termination of Workforce Unit Restrictions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the covenants and restrictions hereunder with respect to the Workforce Units, including, without limitation, the Workforce Rent Roll Verification (as defined below) shall automatically terminate upon full satisfaction of the TIF Note (the “Workforce Unit Term”). (c) Survival of Reporting Obligations. Notwithstanding any the earlier termination of this Declaration or any covenants or restrictions hereunder, any of Declarant’s obligations hereunder with respect to reporting, City auditing, and compliance with the terms of Affordable Unit leases, and the City’s enforcement remedies with respect to the same, shall survive until the expiration of the last of the leases with an Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant. 3. Occupancy Requirements and Restrictions. (a) Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants. During the Term, the Affordable Units shall be leased and occupied (or held vacant and available for occupancy) only by Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants. “Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants” means individuals or households who, at initial occupancy, have a combined gross annual income which does not exceed 50% of the area median income (including adjustments for family size), as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) Area Median Income for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul- Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area (“AMI”). (b) Workforce Unit Qualifying Tenants. During the Workforce Unit Term, the Workforce Units shall be leased and occupied (or held vacant and available for occupancy) at rates (inclusive of utilities and mandatory fees, such as parking) at initial occupancy, that are considered affordable to individuals or households that have a combined gross annual income which does not L-3 4876-1524-2800\3 exceed 120% of the area median income (including adjustments for family size), as determined and announced from time to time by HUD and as published annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (or any successor agency(ies) administrating government affordable housing programs), and if such agency ceases to publish and update such rates during the Term, such annual rents for the Workforce Units shall not be not greater than 30% of 120% of AMI (“Workforce Unit Rents”). (c) Rental Rates. (i) Affordable Units. The Affordable Units shall bear annual rents not greater than the rental rate limits for such Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants (adjusted for bedroom count, and including utilities and mandatory fees, such as parking) as determined and announced from time to time by HUD and as published annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (or any successor agency(ies) administrating government affordable housing programs), and if such agency ceases to publish and update such rates during the Term, such annual rents for the Affordable Units shall not be not greater than 30% of 50% of AMI. (ii) Workforce Units. The Workforce Units shall bear annual rents not greater than the Workforce Unit Rents. (d) Certification of Tenant Eligibility. No tenant household shall be approved by Declarant for initial occupancy of an Affordable Unit, unless and until Declarant has determined (through verification of income, assets, expenses, and deductions) whether such tenant household is an Affordable Unit Qualifying. Each person who is intended to be an Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant, will be required at the commencement of the initial lease of the applicable unit to sign and deliver to Declarant a “Certification of Tenant Eligibility” substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B, or in any other form as may be approved in writing by the Executive Director of the Authority or the City Manager of the City (the “Eligibility Certification”), in which the prospective tenant certifies as to qualifying as an Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant. Eligibility Certifications may be obtained no more than 120 days before an Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant occupies a corresponding unit. In addition, the person will be required to provide whatever other information, documents, or certifications are deemed reasonably necessary by the Authority or the City to substantiate the Eligibility Certification. Eligibility Certifications will be maintained on file by Declarant for a period of 10 years following the end of the Term. Declarant must re-examine and verify the income of each tenant household living in an Affordable Unit annually. (e) Leases. The Affordable Units and Workforce Units shall be rented pursuant to a written lease, and the term of each such lease shall be least 12 months, except that during the final year of the Term, new leases for the Affordable Units and Workforce Units may be for a term of no less than six months, and such newly leased Affordable Units or Workforce Units shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Declaration until the expiration of such new leases. (f) Additional Requirements for Affordable Units. In addition, each lease utilized by Declarant in renting any Affordable Unit to any person who is intended to be an Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant shall: (i) not require a security deposit in excess of the amount of one month of rent in connection with any Affordable Unit; L-4 4876-1524-2800\3 (ii) provide that rental rates charged to any Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant of an Affordable Unit cannot be increased more than once in any 12-month period; (iii) provide for termination of the lease and consent by the person to eviction for failure to qualify as an Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant as a result of any material misrepresentation made by the person with respect to the Eligibility Certification; (iv) include a clause wherein each individual tenant or tenant certifies the accuracy of the statements made in its application and Eligibility Certification; and (v) include a clause wherein each individual tenant or tenant certifies that the family income at the time the lease is executed will be deemed substantial and material obligation of the tenant’s tenancy; that the tenant will comply promptly with all requests for income and other information relevant to determining low or moderate income status from Declarant, the Authority, or the City, and that the tenant’s failure or refusal to comply with a request for information with respect thereto will be deemed a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenant’s tenancy of its Affordable Unit. (g) Affordable Unit Mix. The Affordable Units shall consist of at least twenty (20) one-bedroom units, and eight (8) two bedroom units, and each as specifically identified in the table below [Affordable Units will be fixed; prior to execution, insert final Affordable Units below]. The two-bedroom units must be leased to Affordable Units Qualified Tenants consisting of households of at least two members. Any change in the foregoing distribution and below identification of Affordable Units shall require the prior written approval of the Executive Director of the Authority and City Manager of the City, which such consent will not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. Affordable Units Type of Unit Unit No. Floor Square Feet 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. L-5 4876-1524-2800\3 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 4. Enforcement of Covenants and Restrictions. (a) Annual Affordable Units Certification. Declarant shall prepare and submit to the Authority and the City, annually for approval on the basis of compliance with this Declaration, a certificate substantially in the form of the attached Exhibit C, executed by Declarant, (i) identifying the tenancies and the dates of occupancy (or vacancy) for all Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants, including the percentage of the dwelling units of the Project which were occupied by Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants (or held vacant and available for occupancy by Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants) at all times during the year preceding the date of the certificate; (ii) describing all transfers or other changes in ownership of the Project or any interest therein; and (iii) stating that all Affordable Units were rented or available for rental on a continuous basis during the year to Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants and that Declarant was not otherwise in default under this Declaration during the year. The initial deadline for submission of such certification is three months following the date that all the Affordable Units are first occupied by Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants and thereafter an annual deadline for submission of January 31. (b) Semi-Annual Workforce Units Certification. At least 30 days prior to each semi- annual TIF Note payment, Declarant shall provide the Authority with a certification of rent rolls for the previous six-month period, which show the Workforce Unit Rents are in accordance with the terms of this Declaration and the Redevelopment Agreement. (c) Books and Records. Declarant shall permit, during normal business hours and upon reasonable written notice, any duly authorized representative of the Authority or City, to inspect any books and records of Declarant regarding the Project with respect to the incomes of tenant households of Affordable Units and the rents charged for Affordable Units and Workforce Units to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Declaration. At the City’s or Authority’s request, Declarant will submit any other information, documents or certifications that Declarant, in its reasonable discretion, deems necessary to substantiate Declarant’s compliance with the requirements of this Declaration. (d) Delegation; Third-Party Monitoring. Each of the Authority and the City may, in their reasonable discretion, delegate their obligations hereunder and responsibilities for monitoring and enforcement of this Declaration to a separate subdivision of the City and/or one or more designated contractors, subcontractors, or agents. Declarant shall, upon annual invoicing, reimburse the Authority and the City for third-party expenses related to monitoring of Declarant’s compliance with this Declaration, which such costs shall initially not exceed $2,700 per year (plus any additional costs necessitated by re-inspections for noncompliance with this Declaration) and thereafter be subject to reasonable adjustment from time to time. (e) City Affordable Housing Policy. The Project and the Affordable Units shall be subject to the terms and condition of the City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy Program, as may be amended from time to time. L-6 4876-1524-2800\3 (f) Notice of Non-Compliance. Declarant shall immediately notify the Authority and the City if at any time during the term of this Declaration the dwelling units in the Project are not occupied or available for occupancy as required by the terms of this Declaration. 5. Additional Covenants, Representations, and Warranties of Declarant. (a) Extension of Affordable Housing Requirements. On or about the date which is one (1) year before the expiration of the Term, the Authority and Declarant shall negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of an extension of initial 20-year Term hereof as to the Affordable Units. Both parties agree to negotiate in good faith but without binding either party to a particular outcome, including binding the Developer to an extension of the 20-year term if the parties are unable to agree upon terms and conditions acceptable to Developer. (b) Legal Compliance. Declarant shall construct and maintain the Affordable Units, the Workforce Units, and the Project in compliance with all requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement (including, without limitation, the level of finishes and amenities described in the Redevelopment Agreement), the City Approvals, any requirements of any lender whose loan is secured by a mortgage to which Declarant is a party or by which it or the Project is bound, and all applicable ordinances, building and use restrictions, code-required building permits, and any requirements with respect to licenses, permits, and agreements necessary for the lawful use and operation of the Project. (c) No Violation. The execution and performance of this Declaration by Declarant (i) will not violate or, as applicable, have not violated any provision of law, rule or regulation, or any order of any court or other agency or governmental body, and (ii) will not violate or, as applicable, have not violated any provision of any indenture, agreement, mortgage, mortgage note, or other instrument to which Declarant is a party or by which it or the Project is bound, and (iii) will not result in the creation or imposition of any prohibited encumbrance of any nature. (d) Section 8 Housing. Declarant shall accept tenants who are (i) recipients of federal certificates for rent subsidies pursuant to the existing program under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, codified as 42 U.S.C. Sections 1401 et seq., or its successor, or (ii) any other housing assistance program. Declarant shall not adopt any policies specifically excluding rental to tenants holding Section 8 certificate/voucher or who are recipients any other housing assistance program solely because of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder or recipient. (e) Underserved Populations. Declarant shall affirmatively market the Affordable Units and the Workforce Units to one or more traditionally underserved populations as affordable at the rates required hereunder. (f) Consents and Subordination. Declarant shall obtain the consent to this Declaration of any prior recorded lien-holder for the Property and shall cause such liens to be subordinated to this Declaration. Declarant has not and will not execute any other agreement with provisions contradictory to, or in opposition to, the provisions hereof and that, in any event, the requirements of this Declaration are paramount and controlling as to the rights and obligations set forth herein and supersede any other document’s provisions in conflict herewith. (g) Transfer Restrictions. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement and the City Approvals, Declarant may sell, transfer or exchange the Project, the Property or any portion thereof, but Declarant shall notify the Authority and the City in writing at L-7 4876-1524-2800\3 least 30 days prior to such sale, transfer or exchange, and use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the acknowledgment of any buyer or successor or other person acquiring the Project or any interest therein that such acquisition is subject to the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration (and to the requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement incorporated herein). Failure by Declarant to obtain such acknowledgment shall not be deemed to impair the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration. (h) Alterations; Use. Declarant shall not demolish any part of the Project or substantially subtract from any real or personal property of the Project or permit the use of any residential unit for any purpose other than rental housing during the Term of this Declaration unless required by law. Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants and Workforce Unit Qualifying Tenants shall have the same access to the Project amenities as residents of the market-rate units. (i) Condemnation, Damage, or Destruction. In the event that title to and possession of the Project or any material part thereof shall be taken in condemnation or by the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any governmental body or other person (except the Authority or the City) or the Project is damaged or destroyed, Declarant shall, with reasonable promptness after such taking, notify the Authority as to the nature and extent of such damage or taking, as applicable. Upon receipt of any condemnation award or insurance proceeds Declarant shall elect to either: (a) use the entire condemnation award or insurance proceeds to reconstruct the Project (or, in the event only a part of the Project has been taken or damaged, then to reconstruct such part) upon the remaining Property to the extent necessary to maintain and continue operations of Project for its intended purpose; or (b) in the event that the condemnation affects or taking or damage or destruction affects the Property but not the Project improvements thereon, retain, for the account of Declarant, all of the condemnation award or insurance proceeds. The foregoing notwithstanding, the use of condemnation or insurance proceeds shall be subject to the Declarant’s Lender’s requirements and approval. 6. Remedies; Enforceability. In the event of a violation or attempted violation of any of the covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained that is not cured, ended or remedied within 30 days after written notice to do so, the City or the Authority may institute and prosecute any proceeding at law or in equity to abate, prevent or enjoin any such violation, or enforce specific performance by Declarant of the covenants, obligations, conditions and/or restrictions set forth herein, or to recover monetary damages caused by such violation or attempted violation; provided, however, if any such violation occurs under this Declaration which reasonably requires more than 30 days to cure, the City and the Authority will delay exercising the foregoing remedies, provided that the curing of such violation is promptly commenced upon receipt of the written notice of violation, and with due diligence is thereafter continuously prosecuted to completion and is completed within a reasonable period of time, and provided that the Declarant keeps the City and the Authority informed at all times of its progress in curing the violation; provided, however in no event shall such additional cure period for any violation extend beyond 90 days. Declarant specifically acknowledges that the City and the Authority cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages in the event of any default hereunder. Unless terminated as provided herein, the provisions hereof are imposed upon and made applicable to the Project, and shall be enforceable against Declarant, each purchaser, grantee, owner or tenant of the Project and the respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of each. No delay in enforcing the provisions of said covenants, conditions and restrictions as to any breach or violation shall impair, damage or waive the right to enforce the same or to obtain relief against or recover for the continuation or repetition of such breach or violation or any similar breach or violation thereof at any later time or times. In addition to any remedy set forth herein for failure to comply with the restrictions set forth in this Declaration, any such failure shall be a Default under the Redevelopment Agreement and the City or the Authority may exercise any remedy available to it under the Redevelopment Agreement if such Default becomes an Event of Default. L-8 4876-1524-2800\3 7. Indemnification. Declarant hereby indemnifies, and agrees to defend and hold harmless, the Authority, the City, and their respective officers, officials, employees, and agents, from and against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses (including attorneys’ fees and expenses), causes of action, suits, allegations, claims, demands, and judgments of any nature arising from the consequences of a legal or administrative proceeding or action brought against them, or any of them, on account of any failure by Declarant to comply with the terms of this Declaration, or on account of any representation or warranty of Declarant contained herein being untrue. 8. Covenants Running With the Land. Declarant intends, declares and covenants, on behalf of itself and all future owners and operators of the Property and the Project during the Term, that this Declaration and the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration regulating and restricting the use, occupancy and transfer of the Property and the Project (a) shall be and are covenants running with the Property and the Project, encumbering the Property and the Project for the Term, binding upon Declarant’s successors in title and all subsequent owners and operators of the Property and the Project; (b) are not merely personal covenants of Declarant; and (c) shall bind Declarant (and the benefits shall inure to the Authority and the City) and its respective successors and assigns during the Term or the Workforce Unit Term, where applicable. Declarant hereby agrees that any and all requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota to be satisfied in order for the provisions of this Declaration to constitute deed restrictions and covenants running with the land shall be deemed to be satisfied in full and that any requirements of privileges of estate are intended to be satisfied, or in the alternate, that an equitable servitude has been created to insure that these restrictions run with the land. For the Term, each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed conveying the Property and the Project or portion thereof shall expressly provide that such conveyance is subject to this Declaration; provided, however, that the covenants contained herein shall survive and be effective regardless of whether such contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed conveying the Property and the Project or portion thereof provides that such conveyance is subject to this Declaration. 9. Waiver. The waiver by the Authority of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Declaration shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Declaration shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto or party benefited hereby unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 10. Notices. Any notice, approval, consent, payment, demand, communication, authorization, delegation, recommendation, agreement, offer, report, statement, certification or disclosure required or permitted to be given or made under this Declaration, whether or not expressly so stated, shall not be effective unless and until given or made in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given or made as of the following date: (a) if delivered personally by courier or otherwise, then as of the date delivered or if delivery is refused, then as of the date presented; or (b) if sent or mailed by certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, or by Federal Express, Express Mail or other mail or overnight courier service, then as of the date received. All such communications shall be addressed as follows (which address(es) for a party may be changed by that party from time to time by notice to the other parties). No such communications to a party shall be effective unless and until deemed received at all address(es) for such party: Declarant at: c/o 4620 LLC Attn: Curt Gunsbury 724 N First Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 with a copy to: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill P.A. L-9 4876-1524-2800\3 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 The Authority at: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 The City at: City of Edina Attention: City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. 11. Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Declaration does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Declaration for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Declaration shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Declarant and any construction lender or permanent lender. 12. Amendment. The provisions of this Declaration shall not be amended, terminated or deleted during the Term hereof, except by an instrument in writing duly executed by the Authority, the City, and Declarant, their respective successors and assigns. 13. Attorneys’ Fees. In case any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought against Declarant to enforce the provisions of this Declaration, Declarant agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other reasonable expenses paid or incurred by the City and/or the Authority in connection with the action. 14. Governing Law. This Declaration is governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota and, where applicable, the laws of the United States of America. 15. Severability. If any provisions hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows] L-10 [Signature Page to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4876-1524-2800\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has caused this Declaration to be executed as of the date first written above 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: __________________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ________________, 2022, by _______________, the _______________ of 4620 LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 L-11 [Exhibit A to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4876-1524-2800\3 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said Tract B, a distance of 286.31 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 0 degrees 12 minutes 31 seconds East 473.90 feet to the south line of said Tract B and said line there terminating. L-12 [Exhibit B to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4876-1524-2800\3 Exhibit B Form of Certification of Tenant Eligibility L-13 [Exhibit B to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4876-1524-2800\3 L-14 [Exhibit C to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4876-1524-2800\3 Exhibit C Form of Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance Date: ___________________ The following information with respect to the Project located at 4620 W. 77th Street, Edina, Minnesota (the “Project”), is being provided by 4620 LLC (“Declarant”) to the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”) and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), pursuant to that certain Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (Affordable Housing) dated ________________ ___, 2022 (the “Declaration”), with respect to the Project: (A) The total number of Affordable Units which are available for occupancy is 28. The total number of these units occupied is _________________. (B) The following Affordable Units (identified by unit number) are currently occupied by “Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants,” as the term is defined in the Declaration (for a total of 28 units): Unit Number Name of Tenant Number of Persons Residing in the Unit Number of Bedrooms Total Adjusted Gross Income Date of Initial Occupancy Rent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 L-15 [Exhibit C to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4876-1524-2800\3 (C) Declarant has obtained a “Certification of Tenant Eligibility,” in the form provided as Exhibit B to the Declaration, from each Tenant named in (B) above, and each such Certificate is being maintained by Declarant in its records with respect to the Project. Attached hereto is the most recent “Certification of Tenant Eligibility” for each Tenant named in (B) above who signed such a Certification since ______________, _____, the date on which the last “Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance” was filed with the Authority and the City by Declarant. (D) In renting the residential units in the Project, Declarant has not given preference to any particular group or class of persons (except for persons who qualify as Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants); and none of the units listed in (B) above have been rented for occupancy entirely by students, no one of which is entitled to file a joint return for federal income tax purposes. All of the residential units in the Project have been rented pursuant to a written lease, and the term of each lease is at least twelve (12) months. (E) The information provided in this “Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance” is accurate and complete, and no matters have, to the best knowledge of Declarant, come to the attention of Declarant which would indicate that any of the information provided herein, or in any “Certification of Tenant Eligibility” obtained from the Tenants named herein, is inaccurate or incomplete in any respect. (F) The Project is in continuing compliance with the Declaration. (G) Declarant certifies that as of the date hereof at least 28 of the residential dwelling units in the Project are occupied or held open for occupancy by Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenants, as defined and provided in the Declaration. (H) The rental levels for each Affordable Unit Qualifying Tenant comply with the maximum permitted under the Declaration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature, on behalf of Declarant, on ____________________, 20___. 4620, LLC By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: __________________________________________ L-16 4876-1524-2800\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, ___________________, a ___________________, holder of that certain [Mortgage] executed by 4620 LLC, dated ________________, 20___, filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, in favor of ________________ (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (Affordable Housing) (the “Declaration”), and hereby subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in the Property to the Declaration. ___________________________________, a ___________________ By: _________________________________________ Printed Name: ________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 20___, by ____________________, the _________________ of ___________________, a ___________________, on behalf of the ___________________. (Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment) THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498   M-1  4858-5265-6449\1 Exhibit M Equity and Inclusion Community Engagement Plan The General Contractor will utilize the following strategies when working with local, small, and underutilized businesses to pursue good faith efforts for Minority, Woman Owned Business and Workforce goals, including: o hold a career fair/hiring event specific to this project as it relates to encouraging M/WBE participation from both a company/small business perspective as well as an individual perspective; include potential partnership with the City of Edina for the event. o put in place an invitation and bidding assistance process for less experienced subcontractors and suppliers o team up with business and workforce goal consultants o make plans and specifications available in online plan rooms and via organizations that assist with getting participation from targeted participants o use joint venture arrangements where possible o seek referrals for sub-subcontractors o hold pre-construction meetings for targeted subcontractor participant groups o engage in on-going work with the subcontractors after contract award to ensure that the provided workforce will help meet the goals   SUSTAINABLE BUILDING POLICY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST At each phase, submit to the City appropriate documentation verifying the completion of each requirement. Pre-design Submittal Completion of this phase is required prior to Council approval of project. Date completed by project team: Requirements Reviewed by 1/26/22 Submit a sketch plan as part of a potential application for Planning Commission review and comment City staff - planning 8/8/22 Read the Sustainable Building Policy. n/a 9/23/22 Identify a policy compliance lead for the development team:  Name_____Craig Hartman____________________________  Email_____craig@mdgarchitects.com__________________  Phone_____651-253-2981____________________________ City staff - sustainability 8/8/22 Participate in an introductory meeting coordinated by City’s Sustainability Manager to review policy requirements. At a minimum, project team attendees shall include owner, policy compliance lead, architect, & general contractor (if known). City staff - sustainability 9/23/22 Indicate the project’s intended Sustainable Building Rating System: □ LEED BD+C (Certification at Silver, Gold, or Platinum) □ State of Minnesota B3 Guidelines (Compliant) □ Enterprise Green Communities (Certified) □ GBCI’s Parksmart (Certification at Silver or Gold) □ Alternative approved by the Sustainability Division (NGBS – Silver) City staff - sustainability 9/23/22 Submit the completed pre-design response in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Worksheet. Technical Advisor 9/23/22 Submit the completed pre-design response in the Electric Vehicle Charging Worksheet. Technical Advisor 9/23/22 Submit the completed pre-design response in the Energy Efficiency Standard Worksheet. Technical Advisor 9/23/22 Submit the completed pre-design response in the Bird-safe Glazing Worksheet. Technical Advisor 9/23/22 Submit a site plan/PUD application/HRA review City staff - planning 30% Progress Submittal Date completed by project team: Requirements Reviewed by Register project with Sustainable Building Rating System and submit proof of registration (i.e., Screenshot or email confirmation) City staff - sustainability Submit a checklist of the planned credits to be achieved in the selected Sustainable Building Rating System. City staff - sustainability Submit a Case Study Worksheet including major strategies being designed to achieve elected certification path. City staff - sustainability Submit the completed 30% progress response in the Electric Vehicle Charging Worksheet. Technical Advisor Submit the completed 30% progress response in the Energy Efficiency Standard Worksheet Technical Advisor For residential projects with 1-4 units: submit documentation of a project partner registered with the US DOE Zero Energy Ready Homes OR For all other commercial and residential projects: contact CSBR to register for SB2030 and provide proof of payment (details TBD by CSBR) City staff - sustainability Submit the completed 30% progress response in the Bird-safe Glazing Worksheet and indicate path below: □ Projects seeking LEED: achieve bird collision deterrence point □ All other projects: follow B3 Guideline S.9: Bird-Safe Building Technical Advisor 60% Progress Submittal Date completed by project team: Requirements Reviewed by Submit an updated checklist of the planned credits to be achieved in the selected Sustainable Building Rating System. City staff - sustainability Submit an updated Case Study Worksheet including major strategies being designed to achieve elected certification path. City staff - sustainability Submit the completed 60% progress response in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Worksheet. Technical Advisor Submit the completed 60% progress response in the Electric Vehicle Charging Worksheet. Technical Advisor Submit the completed 60% progress response in the Energy Efficiency Standard Worksheet Technical Advisor Submit the completed 60% progress response in the Bird-safe Glazing Worksheet. Technical Advisor 90% Progress Submittal Date completed by project team: Requirements Reviewed by Submit an updated checklist of the planned credits to be achieved in the selected Sustainable Building Rating System. City staff - sustainability Submit an updated Case Study Worksheet including major strategies being designed to achieve elected certification path. City staff - sustainability Submit the completed 90% progress response in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Worksheet. Technical Advisor Submit the completed 90% progress response in the Electric Vehicle Charging Worksheet. Technical Advisor Submit the completed 90% progress response in the Energy Efficiency Standard Worksheet Technical Advisor Submit the completed 90% progress response in the Bird-safe Glazing Worksheet. Technical Advisor Re-submit documentation during construction if changes impact overlay compliance. Closeout Completion of this phase is required prior to certificate of occupancy. Date completed by project team: Requirements Reviewed by Submit documentation showing the purchase of EV chargers as calculated on the Electric Vehicle Charging Worksheet Technical Advisor Submit photos of installed bird safety strategies as described on the Bird Safe Glazing Worksheet Technical Advisor Submit the Case Study Worksheet with the final narrative of the project (including key achievements, key challenges, certification anticipated, and any variances required). Technical Advisor Schedule 12-month check-in with Sustainability Manager. City staff - sustainability Occupancy Date completed by project team: Requirements Reviewed by Complete Sustainable Building Rating System documentation. Submit documentation reporting the certification level and credits/guidelines achieved prior to the 12-month check in. City staff - sustainability Participate in 12-month check-in with Sustainability Manager. City staff - sustainability Comply with Edina Benchmarking Ordinance by submitting building performance information to Energy Star Portfolio Manager. Additionally, for B3 projects, link to B3 Benchmarking. City staff - sustainability If verification of Bird Safe Building is included in TIF or other agreement: · Submit documentation of verification of first year monitoring of Bird- safe glass. As described in B3 Guideline S.9F. AND · Submit documentation showing verification of adherence to Lights Out management program (annually for ten years). As described in B3 Guideline S.9E. City staff - sustainability Rev. 08/08/2022 SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS POLICY GREENHOUSE GAS WORKSHEET At each phase, complete the worksheet and submit along with the Sustainable Building Policy checklist. The intention of this is tracking of greenhouse gas emission predictions to encourage project teams to consider emissions reductions through an analysis of the embodied carbon of the materials used in construction. This requires conducting a whole building life cycle analysis (LCA) and reporting the results. There are two accepted methodologies for doing this calculation (LEED v4.1 Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction, Option 2 - Path 1 and B3 Guidelines v3.2 M.1A, Part 2 - Whole-Building LCA Model). Pre-design Submittal Question Answer What methodology is being referenced (LEED or B3)? B3 What whole building life cycle analysis tool is being used? Whole Building LCA All other phases (provide LCA report) – optional at 30%, draft at 60%, final at 90% Question Optional: Reference Building (B3) or Baseline Building (LEED) Required: Design Building Total Global Warming Potential (GWP) (kg CO2e) Total Global Warming Potential per Square foot (kg CO2e /sf) (typical range for B3 projects is 13-40) At minimum, the LCA report should include breakdowns as required by the compliance path. Indicate which of the following breakdowns are included in the report. GWP by assembly type (if following B3 protocol) Y / N Y / N GWP by lifecycle stage (if following LEED protocol) Y / N Y / N At closeout, submit updated worksheet and LCA report if changed from the 90% submittal. Rev. 08/08/2022 SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS POLICY ENERGY EFFICIENCY WORKSHEET At each phase, complete the worksheet and submit along with the Sustainable Building Policy checklist. Pre-design Submittal Question Answer What is the intended pathway for the project? (DOE Zero Energy Ready Homes or SB2030) SB2030 All other phases – DOE ZERH pathway only Question Answer (draft at 60%, final at 90%) HERS Target Score HERS Index Score All other phases – SB2030 pathway only Provide the SB2030 Standard at 30% review, a draft of Design values at 60%, final submittal at 90%) Question Energy Carbon Emissions Design Consumption, not including renewables kBtu/yr lbs CO2/yr On-site renewables (E2A21D or E2A31D) kBtu/yr lbs CO2/yr Design Net Consumption = Consumption – on-site renewables (E1A7) kBtu/yr lbs CO2/yr Design Net Consumption per Square Foot (E1A6. Design Net Energy Use per SF) kBtu/sf/yr (E1A8M. Design Net Carbon Emissions per SF) lbs CO2/sf/yr SB2030 Standard (E1A5K) kBtu/sf/yr (E1A8E) lbs CO2/yr Off-site renewables or RECs kBtu/yr lbs CO2/yr Off-site renewables or RECs per Square Foot kBtu/sf/yr lbs CO2/sf/yr Off-site renewables or RECs should be greater or equal to the difference between the Design Net Consumption and the SB2030 Standard. Optional – all paths Proposed design energy use and cost should be easy to obtain from LEED, SB2030 or other energy model. Many energy models will also show similar values for a code level building and a breakdown of electric and gas. Question Answer What code baseline is being used? (ASHRAE 90.1-2016 Appendix G, ASHRAE 90.1-2016 ECBM, IECC 2019, other) Measure Code Baseline Proposed Design Annual energy use (MMBtu) Electric energy use (kWh) Gas energy use (therms) Annual energy cost ($) Electric energy cost ($) Gas energy cost ($) Please submit documentation with similar details if additional energy sources are expected, such as district energy. Rev. 08/08/2022 SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS POLICY ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING WORKSHEET At each phase, complete the worksheet and submit along with the Sustainable Building Policy checklist. For multi-family, consider HOURCAR pilot to help meet requirement. Pre-design Submittal Question Answer Is on-site parking planned for this project? Yes All other phases (provide site plan) Question Answer Is on-site parking planned for this project? Number of on-site parking spots Number of wheelchair accessible parking spots Number of EV chargers, Level 2 or higher Number of parking spots served by Level 2 or higher EV chargers (minimum 5%) Number of “EV ready” parking spots with conduit for Level 2 or higher charging (installed and “ready” parking must total at least 15%) Number of accessible “EV ready” parking spots (information only, no current requirement) At closeout, submit documentation showing the purchase of EV chargers. Rev. 08/08/2022 SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS POLICY BIRD SAFE GLAZING WORKSHEET At each phase, complete the worksheet and submit along with the Sustainable Building Policy checklist. Pre-design Submittal Question Answer What is the expected compliance path? · LEED: bird collision deterrence point · All other projects: follow B3 Guideline S.9: Bird-Safe Building Compliance shall follow the revised compliance path using B3 tools as indicated. What is the ecological context of the project? (habitat on property/in area, wildlife presence, attractants including water and feeding/nesting) Local habitat includes Fred Richards Park to the north, local landscaping on site. What is the history of bird-window problems in area or building (if a renovation)? N/A All other phases Indicate which of the following conditions are present in the project and provide a narrative of how bird safety will be addressed. See the B3 Guidelines and the Bird Friendly Design Guide for strategy details. Condition Present in project? Bird safety strategy Glass/Plexiglass (transparent) railings Glass/Plexiglass-sided walkways Any glazed surface that offers a see-through situation that is 20 feet or less across, such as a small atrium, or glass corners. And the following if they total more than 15% of the surface area: -------- ------- A surface within 50 feet or less of attractants such as trees, shrubs, prairie, grassland, or open water (including green roofs with this type of vegetation) A surface in a see-through situation greater than 20 feet across (such as atriums, gathering spaces/lobbies, etc.) At closeout, submit photos of installed bird safe glazing strategies. Rev. 08/08/2022 SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS POLICY CASE STUDY WORKSHEET At each review, complete the worksheet and submit along with the Sustainable Building Policy checklist. All phases Question Answer Project Name 4620 Apartments Project Address 4620 W 77th Street Project Site Area (GSF) 136,368 sf Project Building Area (GSF) 385,710 sf Building Use Type Multi-Family Mixed Use Project Owner Solhem Development Design Team Momentum Design Group Construction Team TBD Construction Completion Date TBD Certification Anticipated National Green Building Standard - Silver Key Challenges Key Achievements and Strategies Variances Required Rev. 08/08/2022 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Community Engagement, Race and Equity, Health, Sustainability Divisions Phone 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 • EdinaMN.gov Date: October 18, 2022 To: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager From: MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Manager; Heidi Lee, Race and Equity Manager; Jeff Brown, Public Health Administrator; Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Subject: 4620 Apartments Funding Introduction to Values Viewfinder The goal of the Values Viewfinder is to incorporate City Council values in City decision-making processes. The Values Viewfinder team developed a tool to help decision-makers understand, assess, and communicate the impact, opportunities and trade-offs of a given decision using the lens of public health, race and equity, community engagement and sustainability. The four disciplines collectively achieve community well-being. The Values Viewfinder tool includes three steps: (1) a Framing section to orient the user to common terms and to set a baseline understanding of the initiative, key stakeholders, and considerations, (2) a community well-being matrix questionnaire to identify opportunities and tradeoffs, and (3) an Evaluation section to understand early in an initiative how to manage success and track metrics. Purpose and scope of this process The purpose of using the Values Viewfinder tool in the 4620 apartment funding question is to support how funding may be awarded in a way that considers community-wellbeing. The Values Viewfinder tool was used to support the process for awarding funding, not identifying a preferred funding level itself. Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The scope of the process included an understanding of inputs for the 4620 apartment funding decision in each section of the tool through an interview with Community Development staff. Information gathered and discussed included:  Framing: Community Development staff identified drivers behind why this decision must be made, stakeholders who should be involved, key decision-points throughout the decision-making process, and decision goals. o Driver: Illustrate how funding may be awarded to this project in a way that supports community well-being. o Stakeholders: Public – park access changes, City Council – decision makers, Community Development, Parks, Engineering staff – project aligning with City goals and objectives.  Questionnaire: Community Development staff brainstormed how this decision relates to the following questions from the perspective of community well-being: o Benefits & Access: What are the potential positive benefits/access opportunities created by this action? Who will benefit? o Barriers & Impacts: What are the potential negative impacts/consequences/barriers created by this action? Who will be affected by these? o How can this action be adjusted to help advance City goals/values? o Are there other factors to consider? (Aesthetics, cost, time, etc.?)  Evaluation: Community Development staff agreed that the best way to identify success for this decision-point is to be able to succinctly identify and communicate the most significant opportunities and trade-offs related to a funding award. Findings from utilizing the tool The following findings were identified and can be utilized as part of the staff recommendation put forth in this report for the City Council decision-making process. When looking at a potential funding award, the benefits/access are weighed against the barriers/impact. The aim is to achieve the most benefits and access and reduce the barriers and impacts. FINDINGS Health-in-all-Policies Community Engagement Race & Equity Sustainability Benefits & Access (What are potential positive benefits/access opportunities created by this action?)  Provides stable/affordable housing  Close to new Fire Station o Residents have more access to Community Health Programs  Provides life cycle housing for seniors to downsize  Better public access to park o Kids in a good school district  Coffee Shop/Curb Appeal  Fulfills access portion of park master plan  Provides funding mechanism for park access  programming, who lives there, farmers market/city enhancement)  Affordable units adjacent to great park amenity  Stable affordable housing  Expands housing options  Expands affordable housing outside immediate Southdale area  Increase in diversity and housing for people who may not traditional be able  Complies with CAP  Increase green space  Access to green space  Addition of trees)  Transforms underutilized building and surface parking lot Page 3 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 o Location has access and creates access to park  Better access to regional bike trail o Walkability to businesses o Access to walking and bike trails and transit o Walkable to shops/restaurants, less vehicle trips to afford to live in Edina. Barriers & Impact (What are potential negative impacts/consequences/barriers created by this action?)  Privatizing the park, somewhat  Walking access to health food options – Trader Joe’s likely closest  Public Hearing for site plan, but not for allocation these dollars  Perceived opportunity cost, but actually self- generating funding?  Could lead to mistrust if not strictly following our policy (Turnover in CC)  Lack of knowledge by potential renters, i.e. live in a different city and didn’t know about the project. (BTE, Lease-up time, owner)  Not 100% affordable  Development resistant  School district concerns about 1 school with lower income students (Cornelia)  Lack of hiring/construction goals related to R/E o Diverse construction pool has barriers – programs and reporting requirements  Building is in bird migratory flight path Other considerations  Additional Park users without paying park dedication fees Page 4 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Evaluation In any decision-making process, there should be an assessment step to evaluate if the goals and strategies of the decision are met. The definition of success looks different for all decisions; however, it is necessary for the decision makers and stakeholders to define success and the evaluation or data points that support success or unpack gaps in the strategies. The group was guided back to the overall goal in the Framing section, which was to “explore justification to support the funding of 4620 apartment funding” and the group was asked what does success look like. The feedback provided was:  Referendum passing, support from the Edina Housing Foundation,  Receiving a Green Building certification,  Providing a connection to the park,  Diversifying housing options, having 138 affordable units for residents within compliance,  Community accepting of new community members and no high-volume increase of complaints The answers above provide a foundation to dig deeper of what qualitative and quantitative data can be collected. For example, qualitative data can be feedback, a story, narrative from community members such as asking if there are received individual benefits because there is easy accessibility to the park to be outdoors; this data is from the respondents’ perspective. Quantitative data is numerical value that is collected such as the demographic diversity in the residents. The table below provides some examples of numerical and narrative data that can be collected through each lens to that could support the overall goal of the park. Value What are you measuring? Type of data (stories or numbers) Data source (database/ software) Health-in- all-Policies  Accessibility to health programs  Providing lifecycle housing for seniors  Public access to park and education for walkability/bike  Availability to food stores Stories & numbers  Registration of offered programs at Community Health & Safety Center  Housing units offered and occupied by seniors  Park & Recreation programming enrollment  Bike/pedestrian count clicker Race & Equity  Providing stable affordable housing  Workforce and contracting diversity  Resident diversity such as race, age, socioeconomics Stories & numbers  Diversity of activity/programming before & after implementation  Demographic information such as income, age, etc Community Engagement  Programming opportunities such as farmers market, city enhancements  Access and use of building shops  Fulfillment of Fred Richards Park Master Plan  Gap on input from potential renters Stories & numbers  Review of Fred Richards Master Plan  Collection of implemented programs in area  Input from current residents on connection to building, area, community, city enhancements Sustainability  Accessibility to green space  Tree canopies Stories & numbers  Data collection of tree canopy and plant inventory through GIS information  Water shed permits Page 5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Conclusion- Stacked Benefits vs Trades-Offs One key result of this tool exercise is to identify overlapping opportunities and tradeoffs between these values. Through conversation, staff highlighted the following overlapping opportunities:  Affordable units, and affordable units with greenspace/park access. o This development not only increases the number of affordable units in Edina, but increases the number of affordable units near greenspace. (values optimized: Race and Equity, Health in All Policies, Sustainability).  Access to green transportation and reduction in impervious parking spaces. o This development increases access to walking and bicycling trails, while also discouraging additional car trips by removing underutilized structure like the existing surface parking lot (values optimized: Health in All Policies, Sustainability).  Increased neighborhood activation through programming and amenities proximity. o This development makes city amenities more available to a diversity of users, including the new Fire Station, local small businesses and the park. This increased access can influence culturally aware programming and inform creative solutions to challenges such as distance from grocery stores (i.e. a pop-up park farmers market) (values optimized: Health in All Policies, Engagement). Identified site selection tradeoffs include:  Private park access o Current development plans include sidewalk infrastructure that preferences park access from the apartment building, creating a sense that the park may only be accessed by private users. While park access is critical, a perception that only apartment dwellers are welcome impacts who in the community is able to engage with this public amenity. (values tradeoffs: a site with new park access achieves Health in All Policy goals, but private access creates barriers to achieving Engagement or Race and Equity goals).  Greenspace use for needed stormwater storage and landscaping, while adding park users without assessing park dedication fees o This development necessitates stormwater management, which impacts available greenspace for other activities. Right now the development is not paying park dedication fees, despite likely increasing the number of users (values tradeoffs: Sustainability, Race and Equity) In conclusion, this process identified the top opportunities to maximize the expression of City values in this decision. It also identified the top tradeoffs that Council must consider when determining whether or not to award funding. Finally, this tool’s findings lay the foundation for the next decision-point in the 4620 apartment project, and how to incorporate community well-being throughout.  Alignment of Climate Action Plan  Green certification through City Date: December 8, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI I.B. To:C hair & C ommis s ioners of the Edina HR A Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:S tephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Amendments to New Multifamily Affordable Housing P olicy Ac tion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 C ITY O F E D IN A HO US I NG & R EDEVELO P MENT AUT HO R I T Y 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve proposed amendments to New M ultifamily Affordable H ousing P olicy I N TR O D U C TI O N: B ased on the ever changing housing market and after reviewing recent housing proposals, Staff proposes three changes to the New M ulti-Family Affordable Housing P olicy: · I ncrease the Buy-in from $125,000 per unit to $175,000 per unit. · R equire the inclusion of affordable units if the top half of the density range is requested. · R equire cooperation with the C ity designated compliance officer. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report New Multifamily Affordable Housing Policy 2022 Pres entation December 8, 2022 Chair and Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Proposed Amendments to the New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy Information / Background: In 2015 the Edina Housing Foundation proposed an Affordable Housing Policy (“Policy”) that requires new residential development with greater than 20-units to include affordable housing units equaling 10% of the combined units’ square footage. In subsequent years the Policy was amended to include a Buy-In option, change the percentage based on the number of units verses square feet, a proportionality provision, and a requirement for non-discrimination of Housing Choice vouchers among other things. The Policy is periodically reviewed to determine if there are gaps in coverage, confusing elements, for ease in understanding, and to make sure the goal of creating affordable housing opportunities is met. Staff is now proposing three primary amendments: • Increase the Buy-in from $125,000 per unit to $175,000 per unit. • Require the inclusion of affordable units if the developer is seeking a density in the top half of the range. • Require cooperation with the City designated compliance officer. Increasing the Buy-In In March 2021 the Buy-in amount was increased from $100,000 to $125,000 to address the increasing disparities between the cost of developing affordable housing and the cost to Buy-In. $125,000 was agreed upon as it aligned with the policies in Cities similar in size and demographics. However, in the heels of COVID the need for affordable housing has increased as have construction costs. The cost disparities continue to grow. Electing to Buy-In versus including affordable units is becoming an increasingly easier option, as indicated by the following: 1. Based on recent proposals, the cost of an affordable unit, including land, is roughly $330,000 per unit where the cost to construct a Market Rate housing unit is over $500,000 per unit. STAFF REPORT Page 2 2. For affordable housing, debt financing based on Net Operating Income account for between 30% and 70% of the Total Development cost. Therefore between 30% and 70% of the financing comes from tax credits and other public sources. Based on recent proposals the Buy-in amount of $125,000 is 38% of the cost to construct a unit and therefore does not cover the gap financing needed. 3. In looking at the rent levels of affordable units compared to market rate units over a 20-year period (using recent proposals as examples), a developer makes more than $326,000 on the market rate unit than on an affordable unit. 4. Since 2015, 118 affordable units were included in Market Rate developments compared to 142 units that were not included in favor of paying the Buy-In fee. Although the cost differential is roughly $326,000 per unit, Staff believes that that high amount would not only be a disincentive to selecting the Buy-In option but could also be a disincentive to residential development generally. As of now there is no defined amount for Buy-in that will dissuade developers from wanting to develop in Edina. We do not know the threshold that will cause developers to turn away because of the fee or not wanting to include the affordable units. Therefore, Staff proposes increasing the Buy-In to $175,000 per unit. This increase was reviewed and is supported by the Edina Housing Foundation. Inclusion Requirement The Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan (“Plan”) provides density ranges for housing units that can be built per acre. For example, in a High-Density Residential area between 12 and 60 housing units per acre are allowed. In Greater Southdale District Residential between 50 to 100 housing units per acre are allowed. Based on recently site plan applications, developers most frequently request maximizing the number of units allowed. The Comprehensive Plan does not indicate that the higher end of the range is deemed a “bonus” tied to affordable housing. Rather the Plan states that denser land use categories allow for the creation of affordable housing. Yet the Policy includes language that states that density bonuses can be used to make including affordable housing units within a market rate development financially feasible. The inclusion of the bonus language in the Policy reflects Staff’s intent that developments seeking the greatest density would include the affordable units within the development. An amendment to the Policy provides clarity to that intention. Staff is proposing a two-tiered system: • Mixed Use Developments: Developments that are 50% or greater of the maximum within the density range must include affordable units within the development. Conversely, developments that are less than 50% the maximum density allowed in a range can choose to include the units or pay the Buy-in fee. • All Residential Developments: Developments that are 75% or greater of the maximum density within the range must include affordable units within the development. Conversely, developments STAFF REPORT Page 3 that are less than 75% the maximum density allowed can choose to include the units or pay the Buy- in fee. Compliance Cooperation It would seem self-evident that the developers who include affordable units within their development would recognize that the City would need to confirm and verify the following: 1. Affordable units were included; 2. The rents on affordable units fall within the published affordable ranges; and 3. Tenants dwelling in affordable units are income qualified. Nonetheless some owners have resisted cooperating with the City’s compliance consultant and we have little recourse when no funding is involved. Staff believe it is important to make developers and owners aware before the development is approved that the City will confirm and verify that the included affordable units comply with the Policy. Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Race & Equity Initiative 1. Comprehensive Plan The New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy is the City’s primary mechanism for creating affordable housing. Since its passage, the City has made great strides in creating more housing opportunities. The passages below are sections of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that support the proposed changes to the Policy. Goal 1: Accommodate all planned residential growth in the city based on planned infrastructure investments and other community goals and assets. 1. Seek to accommodate the total new households projected to locate in the city by the year 2040. 3. Recognize that successfully reaching affordable housing goals assists the city in achieving related community goals, including: f. Addressing climate change through higher density development patterns that help reduce vehicle emissions (see Energy and Environment Chapter) Goal 2: Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. 1. Encourage the production of additional affordable housing units and retention of existing affordable housing units to meet the city’s housing needs and its Metropolitan Council affordable housing need allocation of 1,804 units. 4. Revisit height and density zoning requirements if needed to make the development of affordable housing financially feasible in areas guided for redevelopment. Goal 4: Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences of the existing and future Edina community. 3. Promote affordable and workforce housing that includes a range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. 7. Support the development of both mixed income and 100% affordable housing throughout Edina where there is access to transit. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Status on Achieving 2040 Affordable Housing Goal Forecasted Need Approved % of Need Remaining Total Units 1804 341 18.9% 1463 <30% AMI 751 22 2.9% 729 31-50% AMI 480 178 37.1% 302 51-80% AMI 573 141 24.6% 432 2. Race & Equity Initiative Periodically reviewing an updating the Policy aligns with Goal 16 of the 2018 Race & Equity Initiative Final Report and Recommendations. The report calls for the City to “Review policy with a race and equity lens to include language relating housing to equity and disparities” (page 42). The recommendation goes further by requesting the consideration of removing the Buy-In option. Staff does support collecting some Buy-in funds as they make possible different types of affordable housing programs that are not financed through traditional means. However, increasing the Buy-In amount addresses the concern raised by the Race & Equity Task Force by incentivizing the inclusion of the affordable units. ☐City Council Approved: 11/1/2015 ☒City-Wide Revised: 3/25/2021 ☐Department City of Edina Policy NEW MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING The City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live or work in the City. Since the land appropriate for new multi-family residential development is limited, it is essential that a reasonable proportion of such land be developed into affordable housing units. As such, the City of Edina adopts the following New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS POLICY: 1. “Unit” means either a for-sale dwelling or a rental dwelling in which a lease is signed prior to occupancy. 2. “Financial Assistance” provided the City includes but is not limited to tax increment financing, land write downs, pass-through funding for purposes other than environmental remediation and other forms of direct subsidy. 3. Any specific projects requesting exemptions to the affordable housing requirements of this policy must seek recommendation from the Edina HRA and approval from the Edina City Council based on alternative public purpose. 4. All new multi-family developments of 20 units or more must adhere to this policy and must be zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. 5. Affordable Rental Housing Income and Rents are defined as both gross incomes (adjusted for family size) and gross rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and include utility allowance and any fees that are a requirement of occupancy as per Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Service Code.) that are updated annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and published at www.mnhousing.gov. 2020 income and rental limits can be found at the end of this policy. 6. Affordable Ownership Housing Income and Sales Price are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is at or below 80% of Area median Income. THIS POLICY APPLIES TO ALL NEW MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THAT: 1. Include 20 units of more. 2. Require rezoning or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3. Receive financial assistance from the City of Edina and/or the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 4. Are developed on property purchased from the City of Edina even if no financial assistance is being provided by the City unless the waiver is recommended by the Edina HRA and approved by the Edina City Council. Page | 2 THE POLICY 1. New rental multi-family developments subject to this policy shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% affordable rental rates or 20% residential units at 60% affordable rental rates as defined below. The units shall be occupied by households at or below 60% of the Multi- Family Tax Subsidy Income Limits (MTSP). 2. New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at affordable sales prices as defined below. 3. The affordable unit mix must be approximately proportional to the market rate unit mix. 4. Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: a. on-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. b. Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. c. Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. 5. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years if seeking a PUD and zoning amendment without City financing or 30-years if City financing is approved. and this This requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. 6. New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. 7. The developers and/or owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant-based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant-based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding sourced. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. 8. Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at lease every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. 9. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: a. Density bonuses b. Parking requirement reductions c. Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement Page | 3 d. Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation e. Property Tax Abatement 10. It is the strong preference of the City that each new qualifying development provide its proportionate share of affordable housing on site. However, the City recognizes that it may not be economically feasible or practical in all circumstances to do so. As such, the City reserves the right to waive this policy (only if circumstances so dictate, as determined by the City). In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: a. Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. b. Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. c. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $125,000 $175,000 per unit rounding up to the next whole unit. The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. 11. As allowing maximum density was intended to serve as a density bonus for the inclusion of affordable units, for mixed use developments that have densities 50% or greater of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For residential developments with densities 75% of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For example: a. If zoning allows between 50-100 units per acre, and the residential development is 50-87 units per acre, the developer/owner may elect to include the affordable units into the development, pay the TBI fee, or an approved alternative. b. If the proposed development is 88-100 units per acre, the development must include affordable units within the building. 12. The owners and their agents of multi-family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Non- compliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. 13. Guidelines for implementing this Affordable Housing Policy can be found in the Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide. 202022 INCOME AND RENTAL LIMITS Please refer to the income and rent tables published on www.mnhousing.gov. 201822 OWNERSHIP HOUSING INCOME AND SALES PRICE GROSS INCOMES GROSS RENTS 60% 50% 60% 50% 1 Person $43,440$49,320 $36,200 $41,100 Studio $1,086 $1,233 $905 $1,027 Page | 4 2 Persons $49,680 $56,340 $41,400 $46,950 1 Bedroom $1,164 $1,320 $970$1,100 3 Persons $55,860 $63,360 $46,550 $52,800 2 Bedroom $1,396 $1,584 $1,163$1,320 4 Person $62,040 $70,380 $51,700 $58,650 3 Bedroom $1,613 $1,830 $1,344$1,525 5 Persons $67,020 $76,020 $55,850 $63,350 4 Bedroom $1,800$2,041 $1,500$1,701 Acquisition Limit in this policy definition: $293,500$355,000 20202 income limits as published on the Metropolitan Council website are as follows: 80% of AMI ($78,500$89,400) Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. See www.mnhousing.gov and https://metrocouncil.org/Communities/Services/Livable-Communities-Grants/Ownership-and-Rent- Affordability-Limits.aspx Originally adopted: November 1, 2015 Income/Rent Limits Adjusted: April 13, 2016 As amended: February 7, 2018 As amended: April 3, 2018 As amended: October 2, 2018 As amended: March 5, 2019 Income/Rent Limits Adjusted: December 10, 2020 As amended: March 25, 2021 As Amended: Proposed Revisions to Affordable Housing Policy December 8, 2022 Background Information •2015 Policy initially approved •2018 (winter) Buy-In option was added •2018 (Autumn) Affirmative Fair Marketing and Non- discrimination of Housing Choice Vouchers added •2019 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Created •Rents and incomes adjusted annually EdinaMN.gov 2 Proposed: $175,000 Construction costs have increased Development costs range from $300,000 to $515,000 per unit (affordable to luxury). Increase fee to incentivize including units Current: $125,000 Increased March 2021 Based on other Communities Change #1: Buy-In Fee EdinaMN.gov 3 It is much more Cost Efficient for the Developer to Buy-In rather than to include an affordable unit: Over a 20 -year period a developer’s revenue is significantly greater than $125,000 per unit in a 100% Market Rate Development. Conclusion: Over a 20-year period a100% Market Rate development has revenues $6,500,000 greater than an inclusionary development. This equates to $327,000 per unit that was not affordable (10% or 20 units). $125,000 is only 38% of the difference. •200 unit building with a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units •Income escalator of 2% •20-year affordability Period •Comparing all market rate apartments to one that includes 10% of units at 50% AMI rents. •Market rate rents based on recent proposals. Basic Analysis EdinaMN.gov 4 Inclusion: •4917 Eden –20 units •4977 77th Street –20 units •Lorient –3 units •Avidor –18 units •Aria –8 units (4.3%) •Millenium –11 units (4.8%) •Nolan Mains –10 units •Fred II –28 units TOTAL: 118 units Buy-In: •Fred 1 –in lieu of 41 units •Bower –in lieu of 19 units •7001 France –In lieu 27 units •Lorient –In lieu of 2 units •4425 Valley View –In lieu of 3 units •The Loden –in lieu of 25 units •The Onyx –25 units TOTAL: In lieu of 142 units Inclusion vs. Buy–in Comparison EdinaMN.gov 5 Affordable Housing Goal Affordable Housing Units Approved %Remaining Total Units 1804 341 18.9%1463 <30% AMI 751 22 2.9%729 31-50% AMI 480 178 37.1%302 51-80% AMI 573 141 24.6%432 Affordable Housing Goals EdinaMN.gov 6 •Edina has goal of creating 994 to 1804 new units of affordable housing. •Increases disincentive to Buy-In. •Construction costs are increasing --Buy-In fee does not go as far; --Increasingly less expensive to -Buy-In than to include units. •In 2018 Race & Equity Task Force proposed to Eliminate Buy-in option •No evidence that Buy-In fee is thwarting Developers from wanting to build in Edina Keep Buy-In Option –But increase EdinaMN.gov 7 Importance of Buy-In: Flexibility EdinaMN.gov 8 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Estimated Balance Requests Beginning Balance*$ 8,460,000 Market Street (2019)($750,000) 4d Pilot Program 2018 -NO TAKERS ($160,000) 4d Pilot Program -2019 ($50,000) Single Family Ownership Program (2020)($840,000) Home Rehabilitation Program (Pilot)($250,000) 425 Jefferson ($152,717) Single Family Ownership Program (2021)($1,500,000) Home Rehabilitation Program (Aug. 2021)($750,000) LISC Single Family Partnership Program ($1,260,000) Home Rehabilitation Program (2022)($500,000) First Generation Grant ($150,000) Ending Balance $ 2,402,717 •Making loans at interest rates below or at market rates. •Guaranteeing of loans. •Providing gap financing for affordable housing developments. •Financing the acquisition, demolition, and disposition of property for affordable housing projects. •Financing the rehabilitation, remodeling, or new construction of affordable housing. •Funding to facilitate affordable homeownership opportunities including down payment assistance, second mortgages, closing costs, etc. •Interim financing of public costs for affordable housing projects in anticipation of a permanent financing source (i.e.construction financing, bond sale, etc.) •Other uses as permitted by law and approved by the city council. Affordable Housing Trust Fund EdinaMN.gov 9 Policy Language: Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: •Density bonuses •Parking requirement reductions Etc. Change #2: Regarding Density “Bonuses” EdinaMN.gov 10 Type of Zoning Density Range Mixed Use Residential Only High Density Residential 12-60 >= 36 units >= 48 units Greater Southdale Residential 50-100 >= 75 units >= 88 units Neighborhood Node 10-60 >= 35 units >= 48 units Office Residential 20-75 >= 48 units >= 61 units Mixed Use Center 12-100 >= 56 units >= 78 units Community Activity Center 90-150 >= 120 units >= 135 units Regional Medical Center 50-100 >=75 units >= 88 units Inclusion Required EdinaMN.gov 11 > 50% Max > 75% Max Example 1: •Density range 50-100 units per acre •Proposal is 95 units/acre (90% of Max) Requirement: Development must include affordable units. Example 2: •Density range 50-100 units/acre •Proposal is 70 units/acre (40% of max) Requirement:Either Buy-In, inclusion or blend. Density Level May Require Inclusion EdinaMN.gov 12 Project Project Density Comp. Plan % of Density Onyx –240 units (0 affordable)53 units/acre 75 units/acre 71% Lorient –46 units (3 affordable)50 units/acre 60 units/acre 83% Nolan Mains –100 units (10 aff.)74 units/acre 75 units/acre 99% The Loden –246 units (0 affordable)10 units/acre 30 units/acre 33% Pentagon Village–200 units (20 aff.)16 units/acre 75 units/acre 21% 70th and France –267 units 46 units/acre 150 units/acre 31% Approved Density: Mixed Use EdinaMN.gov 13 Project Project Density Comp. Plan % of Density Aria –185 units (8 affordable)93 units/acre 100 units/acre 93% Millennium –375 units (11 aff.)66 units/acre 105 units/acre 63% Avidor –166 units (16 aff.)95 units/acre 100 units/acre 95% Sound on 76th –70 units (all aff.)35 units/acre 40 units/acre 75% Edina Flats–18 units (0 aff.)14 units/acre 30 units/acre 47% Amundson Flats–62 units (all aff.)50 units/acre 50 units/acre 100% Hazelton Road Apts. –186 units 149 units/acre 150 units/acre 99% 4040 70th Street –118 aff.75 units/acre 75 units/acre 100% Perkins Site –196 units (20 aff.)94 units/acre 100 units/acre 94% Approved Density: Residential EdinaMN.gov 14 Add: •The owners and their agents of multi- family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Non-compliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. •Amend rent, sales price, and income limits Change #3: Cooperation EdinaMN.gov 15 City Comparisons City # Units to Trigger Affordability Requirements Term of Affordability Buy-In Edina 20 10% @ 50% AMI or 20% @ 60% AMI 20-years $125,000*10% Minnetonka 10 10% @60% with Minimum of 5% @ 50% AMI. If City $: 20% @ 50% AMI or 40% @ 60% AMI.30-years NA St. Louis Park 10 5% @ 30% AMI; 10% @ 50% AMI; 20% @ 60% AMI 25-years Ownership Only Eden Prairie 15 5% @30% AMI, or 10% at 50% AMI, or 15% @ 60% AMI in perpetuity NA Richfield 5 20% @ 60% AMI 10-years 15% NPV of Tax increment pledged for 10-years Golden Valley 10 10% @50% AMI or 15% @60% AMI 20-years NA EdinaMN.gov 16 EdinaMN.gov 17 Location of Affordable Housing EdinaMN.gov 18 Questions?