HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-03-19 City Council Meeting PacketAgenda
City Council Meeting
City of Edina, Minnesota
City Hall Council Chambers
Tuesday, March 19, 2024
7:00 PM
Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or
Facebook.com/EdinaMN.
Participate in Community Comment
Call 312-535-8110
Enter access code 2630 278 4703
Password is 5454
Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak
A sta5 member will unmute you when it is your turn
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
III.Pledge of Allegiance
IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
V.Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to
share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public
hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed
during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments
to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on
the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should
not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments
tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during
Community Comments at the next meeting.
A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments
VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda
All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless
requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item
will be considered immediately following the adoption of the
Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council
Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent
item.)
A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Mar. 6, 2024
B.Approve Payment of Claims
C.Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek
Watershed for Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake Water-
Quality Improvement Project
D.Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Grandview and
Vernon Street Lighting Replacement
E.Request for Purchase: Professional Services for York Avenue
Pond Improvements
F.Approve Contract Change No. 1 with Davey Resource Group for
Bredesen Park Restoration Project
G.Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Concept Design
for Interlachen Boulevard
H.Resolution No. 2024-25: Approving Shade Tree Program Bonding
Grant Agreement
I.Request for Purchase: ENG 24-5 50th Street and Grange Road
Improvements
J.Request for Purchase: Braemar Park Courtney Fields Site
Improvements
K.Request for Purchase: Four 2024 Ford Lightning Trucks
L.Request for Purchase: 800MHz Motorola Mobile Radios
M.Request for Purchase: South Metro Public Safety Training
Facility Tactical Training Building Service Contract
N.Resolution No. 2024-26: Accepting Business District Initiative
Grant
O.Approve Contract for Services with Edina Resource Center
P.Approve 2024 Liquor License Renewals for Cub Foods and
Speedway #4047
VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations
A.Introduce Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager
B.Stormwater Utility Overview
C.Clean Water Strategy Vision (Values and Goals) Preview
VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council
Members present to approve except where noted)
A.Resolution No. 2024-27: Accepting Donations
B.Resolution No. 2024-21: Amending the Capital Improvement
Plan to Authorize Increase Bonding for Community Health &
Safety Center (Fire Station 2)
C.Approve Design Option 1A for Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
IX.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory
Communication)
A.Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission, January 23,
2024
B.Minutes: Community Health Commission: January 8 and
February 12, 2024
C.Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission Feb. 13, 2024
X.Manager's Comments
XI.Mayor And Council Comments
XII.Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public
process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliIcation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: V.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Other
From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Responses to questions posed during Community Comment at the last meeting were posted on the City’s website
at https://www.edinamn.gov/2051/Responses-to-Community-Comment. City Manager Neal will provide
summaries of those responses during the meeting.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Mar. 6,
2024
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve minutes as presented.
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Minutes: Draft Council Work Session, Feb. 6, 2024
Minutes: Draft City Council Regular, Mar. 6, 2024
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2024
5:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Answering roll call were Members Agnew, Jackson, Risser and Mayor Hovland.
Absent: Member Pierce
Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Gillian Straub, City Management Fellow, Assistant City
Manager Ari Lenz; Chad Millner, Director of Engineering; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director;
Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Ryan
Browning, IT Director, and Sharon Allison, City Clerk.
Others in attendance: Representative Heather Edelson, (50A), DFL, Representative Cheryl Youakim, (46B)
DFL, Julie Greene, Mike Lund, and Katy Sen.
2024 STATE LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION PLATFORM
Mayor Hovland welcomed State Representatives Heather Edelson and Cheryl Youakim. He introduced
Edina’s six legislative priorities and shared the Bonding for Interchange Improvements at MN Highway 100
and Vernon Avenue/West 50th Street was a rare opportunity to combine the needs of the city, county, and
state. Manager Neal shared the Senate’s Greater Metro Area Bonding tour made a stop in Edina to learn
about this project and they seemed supportive. The Mayor shared that this was also an opportunity to add
a new fire station in this area.
Neal spoke about bonding for the Aquatic Center, a popular regional destination, and Director Vetter
shared the 1958 built needed critical infrastructure repairs to meet changes in state code.
The Mayor shared the Sales Tax Exemption for Projects in the Braemar Park Master Plan and Fred
Richards Park Master Plan was related to the Local Option Sales Tax and getting an exemption for the
material and supplies purchased for the construction, reconstruction, upgrade, expansion, or remodeling of
City facilities included in the two master plans.
Neal shared the Bonding for Fires Station 2 Construction Costs was to expand the use of funds to include
construction costs, as has been allowed with numerous other projects that received state bonding.
Neal shared they were interested in expanding the range of eligible expenses for the City’s Lodging Taxes
to include economic development program and for local community festivals and events such as fireworks
for the 4th of July. He said the Edina Chamber of Commerce was supportive. Edelson and Youakim said the
lodging taxes may be a difficult legislation to pass.
Economic Development Manager Neuendorf shared that for the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Legislation
for 70th and France and 72nd and France, the ask was to extend the timeline from 5-years to 10. He said
there were over $400 million of private investment but since the districts were established, the national
economic climate has changed, and extending the timeline to 10 years would allow the private lending
sector to return to normal, likely by 2025. He added that other communities around the state were facing
the same issue. Edelson recommended community engagement/education on the use of TIF.
After reviewing the six legislative priorities, Youakim and Edelson agreed they were reasonable except for
the Lodging Tax.
Other discussion included changing group home regulation because of a recent proposal where an entire
block was proposed to become group homes, however, there was consensus during discussion that this
was a sensitive topic; support for banning plastic bags and current limitation; a new bottle bill that would be
coming; and an update on the school resource officers bill and changes that were made.
Rep. Edelson spoke about legislation for spousal reimbursements through Medicare and that this was in
place during COVID but expired in November and how it was an important issue in the care community
because of understaffing. Rep. Youakim had several questions related to the Environment and Sustainability
and Public Safety positions but would speak offline with staff because of time constraints.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:43 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
_____________________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Minutes approved by the Edina City Council Feb. 20, 2024.
_____________________________
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Page 1
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 6, 2024
7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and
community comment.
II. ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland.
Absent: None.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED
Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to approve the meeting agenda
as presented.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
Ralph Zickert, 4311 Cornelius Circle, shared comments regarding the City’s lack of accomplishments in 2023
that included a failed new fire station construction proposed for Rosland Park, lack of a clear clean water
strategy, budget levy and utility rate increases, and poor liquor store performance. He commented on the
need for better leadership and how the City needs to be held accountable.
Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, shared concerns about the City’s lodging tax and how restricted funds for lodging
tax were directed to Edinburgh Park and were instead coming from the general fund.
David Frenkel, 4510 Lakeview Drive, referred to a letter from the US Department of Justice regarding their
investigation of ADA violations act in reference to the bridge near the Public Works site and requested
feedback from the City on data not yet disclosed to the public.
Floyd Grabiel, 7510 Cahill Road, #312B, thanked the Council for their service then noted he had served as
Planning Commissioner in the past. He shared concerns about Winwood condominium of 206 units and
the current crisis in the insurance market. He said they had been unable to renew their insurance coverage
and now have a policy that increased from $147,000 to $650,000 which was not affordable. He noted that
how Minnesota had been a catastrophic state due to hail and windstorm damage, especially for older
buildings. He asked the Council to share these facts with anyone they could to help address these concerning
costs.
VI.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS
City Manager Neal responded to Community Comments from current and past meetings.
The Council asked questions and provided feedback.
VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED
Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving the consent agenda
as amended removing Items VI.A., Minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meeting of
February 20, 2024, and VI.I., Traffic Safety Report of January 30, 2024, as follows:
VI.A. Minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meeting of February 20, 2024
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 6, 2024
Page 2
VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Pre-List Dated February 16, 2024,
totaling $1,269,102.78 and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated February 23, 2024,
totaling $767,310.58
VI.C. Approve First Amendment to Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek
Watershed for Rosland Park Clean Water Project
VI.D. Request for Purchase; Contract ENG 24-1 NB-5 Mill Pond Mechanical Harvesting of
Aquatic Vegetation Management, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Premier Lake Harvesting for 2024 and 2025, $68,600
VI.E. Request for Purchase; Contract ENG 24-1 NB-1 Non-Assessed Aquatic Vegetation
Management, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Lake Management,
Inc., for 2024-2025, $83,744
VI.F. Request for Purchase; ENG 24-4 Bredesen Park Restoration Construction Oversight,
awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, RES, $44,309
VI.G. Request for Purchase; City Hall Election Storage Professional Services, awarding the
bid to the recommended low bidder, Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, $76,000
VI.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-23; Support for GreenCorps Host Site Application
VI.I. Traffic Safety Report of January 30, 2024
VI.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-22; Accepting Metropolitan Council Local Housing
Incentives Account Grant and Authorizing Execution of Grant Agreement
VI.K. Request for Purchase; 2024 Ford F350, awarding the bid to the recommended low
bidder, Boyer Ford, $90,860
VI.L. Request for Purchase; 2024 Chevy Suburban, awarding the bid to the recommended
low bidder, TRES, $72,984
VI.M. Request for Purchase; Manhole Liner Contract, awarding the bid to the recommended
low bidder, Underground Utility Specialties to seal 1097 manholes, $70,000
VI.N. Request for Purchase; ProjectDox ePlan SaaS Renewal, awarding the bid to the
recommended low bidder, Avolve Software, $35,352
VI.O. Approval of 2024-2025 Union Contract for IUOE Local 49 Public Service Workers
VI.P. Request for Purchase; Engagement Website Software Renewal, awarding the bid to the
recommended low bidder, Granicus for BetterTogetherEdina.org for $25,843
VI.Q. Approve 2024 Liquor License Renewals
Rollcall:
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
VII.A. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND WORKSHOP OF FEBRUARY 20, 2024 –
APPROVED
The Council referred to the lack of inclusion of Council comments in minutes, especially regarding the last
sketch plan review and worksession direction. The Council suggested the information should be included
to provide reasons in the event they needed to defend a challenge and that minutes were not complete nor
provided a balanced narrative.
Communications Director Bennerotte and Clerk Allison commented on the historical context and decision
of past Councils to create shorter meeting minutes and rely on the video for better context.
Attorney Kendall stated the minutes met the statutory requirements but if Council wanted to see more
text, that could be directed but currently this was the policy decision.
Manager Neal noted the video record could be accessed by the public for better context but that if directed
by a majority of the Council, the minutes format could be changed. He noted meeting room space could be
provided to any member of the public wishing to review meeting footage.
The Council asked questions and provided feedback.
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 6, 2024
Page 3
Member Risser made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to approve minutes of the
regular meeting and workshop of February 20, 2024, as presented.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
VI.I. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF JANUARY 30, 2024 – ACCEPTED
The Council asked about requests for sidewalks where staff recommended that crosswalks warrants were
not met.
Director of Engineering Millner explained reasons for warrants that included substantial conflicts, presence
of regional trails, school crossings, volume of pedestrians, traffic volume, and speed of motorists. He noted
crosswalks range from $2,000-$3,000 and did not include maintenance costs and the need to balance that
with crosswalks that continue to be effective.
Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to accept the traffic safety
report of January 30, 2024, as presented.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
Introduction of Finance Director Pa Thao
Mr. Neal introduced the City’s new Finance Director Thao who shared her background and said she was
pleased to serve in this new role.
VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
VII.A. 2023 TRAFFIC SAFETY SUMMARY REPORT – RECEIVED
Traffic Safety Coordinator Bauler presented the annual Traffic Safety Summary Report for 2023. He outlined
the five categories of focus that included parking and signage, intersection control, traffic calming, pedestrian
safety, and others. He reviewed the 183 requests submitted and how the Commission reviewed 167 which
included 51 submitted from prior years. He reviewed actions taken place in response to requests in areas
that included Market Street, Valley View Road, and the Wooddale Avenue shared use path, then reviewed
requests by areas in the City and request trends.
The Council asked questions and provided feedback.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
VIII.A. PUBLIC HEARING: NEW ONSALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR
LICENSES FOR 4917 EDEN, LLC, DBA STARLING – APPROVED
Clerk Allison reported that 917 Eden, LLC, dba Starling, would be opening in Maison Green at 4917 Eden
Avenue across from City Hall. The applicant had applied for On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor
licenses. Staff reviewed the application and found it to be complaint with code requirements. A background
investigation was completed by the Police Department and staff recommended approval of the liquor licenses
and request approval immediately, an exception to the two-meeting public hearing process.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared.
The Council asked questions and provided feedback.
Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 6, 2024
Page 4
Motion carried.
Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve the approve new
On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses for 4917 Eden, LLC, dba Starling. as
presented.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
Brent Frederick, applicant, shared about the Starling restaurant and thanked staff for their work so they can
be ready to train in April with a soft opening shortly after. He outlined the themed eatery that included
culinary focused, globally inspired flavors. He also commented on the new developer being searched for on
the proposed apartment project.
VIII.B. PUBLIC HEARING: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21; AMENDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN TO AUTHORIZE INCREASED BONDING FOR COMMUNITY
HEALTH AND SAFETY CENTER (FIRE STATION 2) – CONTINUED TO MARCH 19, 2024
Ms. Thao stated in June 2022, Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-56 to authorize financing for up to
$39,000,000 of general obligation bonds for the land acquisition, design, and construction of the fire station
project. The original plan authorized a not to exceed $39,000,000 bonding amount. The City completed site
acquisition in 2022, anticipating the design and construction contracts to be awarded in 2023 and 2024.
Preliminary design indicated the need to increase the project budget due to cost escalations and refined
scope. Final bid results were received in December 2023 and the Council subsequently approved increasing
the project budget by $8,300,000 to $47,300,000. The plan was amended to authorize an additional bonding
amount, not to exceed $8,300,000, subject to City Council approval for the project. She said following the
close of the public hearing on March 10, staff recommended City Council to adopt Resolution No. 2024-21.
Nick Anhut, Ehlers and Associates, explained the process for general obligation bonds and bonding
authorization which was subject to 30-day reverse referendum through a valid petition process. He said the
proposed action authorized up to $39 million for the site at 4401 76th Street West. He then reviewed bonds
and timing for construction next year. He outlined the 2023 additional costs of $47.3 million which were
approved in February 2024 then explained the levy for the $2.8 million represented a 5.15% overall levy
increase from 2024 to pay for the bonds. He outlined the City’s current credit rating and potential
implications and said after review, while there would be an increased debt load, there would be no impact
to the City’s overall credit rating if issued and no concerns or material change to the City’s credit rating.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared.
The Council asked questions and provided feedback.
Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to close the public hearing on
March 10, 2024, and continue action on Resolution No. 2024-21 amending the Capital
Improvement Plan to authorize bonding increase for the Community Health & Safety Center
(Fire Station2) to the March 19, 2024, City Council meeting.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
IX.A. PROPOSED 2024-2026 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH CITY MANAGER – APPROVED
Mr. Neal shared the City Council conducted his 2023 performance review January 16, 2024, and as a result
of the review, he had requested that Mayor Hovland and Council Member Pierce meet to discuss requests
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 6, 2024
Page 5
for a new employment agreement. As a result of the meetings, the proposed 2024-2026 employment
agreement was being presented for consideration.
The Council asked questions and provided feedback.
Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson to approve the proposed 2024-
2026 employment agreement with the City Manager as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
X. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) –
Received
X.A. MINUTES: ARTS AND CULTURE, DECEMBER 14, 2023
X.B. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JANUARY 11, 2024
X.C. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JANUARY 18, 2024
XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received
XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to adjourn the meeting at 9:17
p.m.
Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 19, 2024.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the March 6, 2024, meeting available.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Claims
From:Pa Thao, Finance Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Claims for Payment:
Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.01.2024 TOTAL $2,614,305.80
Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.08.2024 TOTAL $1,672,128.86
INTRODUCTION:
Claims information for approval is attached.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.01.2024 TOTAL $2,614,305.80
Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 03.08.2024 TOTAL $1,672,128.86
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 54
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR
1000 General 184,303.782100 Police Special Revenue 13,015.582500 Conservation & Sustainability 30,379.902600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 2,862.752600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 114,634.454000 Capital Projects 615,040.124200 Equipment Replacement 38,421.704400 PIR Capital Projects 200,363.764600 MSA tracking 167,898.415100 Art Center 539.315200 Braemar Golf Course 8,817.005200 Braemar Golf Course 7,321.665400 Edinborough Park 3,584.685500 Braemar Arena 18,552.125600 Braemar Field 1,086.355700 Centennial Lakes 1,294.005800 Liquor 96,779.395900 Utility Fund 70,245.925900 Utility Fund 967,446.855900 Utility Fund 10,101.006100 Equipment Operations 17,791.616200 Information Technology 30,435.476300 Facilities Management 10,932.017100 PS Training Facility 2,457.989999 Pooled Cash Fund 2,614,305.80
TOTAL 2,614,305.80 2,614,305.80
** END OF REPORT - Generated by Jesus Martinez **
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 1
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
195 02/27/2024 WIRE 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Jan 2024 SAC 02/02/2024 34,491.80
Invoice: Jan 2024 SAC
34,491.80 12100000 4307 Build Insp - SAC
CHECK 195 TOTAL: 34,491.80
196 03/01/2024 WIRE 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 0001167856 02/01/2024 518,955.78
Invoice: 0001167856 Waste Water Services Def Rev
518,955.78 59159104 6302 Sew Treat - Sew Serv
CHECK 196 TOTAL: 518,955.78
493022 03/01/2024 PRTD 101971 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER 233285-001 02/05/2024 20240301 142.55
Invoice: 233285-001
142.55 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
CHECK 493022 TOTAL: 142.55
493023 03/01/2024 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0176988-IN 01/11/2024 22200109 20240301 19,873.00
Invoice: 0176988-IN 2024 2500HD Double cab Truck with Flat Bed
19,873.00 42700000 6711 PW ER - CapVh&Equp
CHECK 493023 TOTAL: 19,873.00
493024 03/01/2024 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 12354787 01/31/2024 20240301 115.96
Invoice: 12354787
115.96 59059003 6556 Wat Distr - Tool&Acces
ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 12354800 01/31/2024 20240301 149.00
Invoice: 12354800
149.00 59059003 6556 Wat Distr - Tool&Acces
CHECK 493024 TOTAL: 264.96
493025 03/01/2024 PRTD 133140 ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS INC 24765 02/09/2024 20240301 2,678.66
Invoice: 24765 Blue card subcription- 1 year
2,678.66 12012000 6105 Fire Gen - Dues&Sub
CHECK 493025 TOTAL: 2,678.66
493026 03/01/2024 PRTD 143143 TORRES, ARMANDO CHAVEZ 2696 02/01/2024 20240301 1,000.00
Invoice: 2696
1,000.00 57057000 6230 General - SrvCntrcts
TORRES, ARMANDO CHAVEZ 2693 02/01/2024 20240301 464.59
Invoice: 2693 February ART Commercial Cleaning Services
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 2
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
464.59 51051000 6103 Admin/Ops - Prof Svrs
TORRES, ARMANDO CHAVEZ 2665 01/01/2024 20240301 4,406.00
Invoice: 2665 Braemar Arena-cleaning service
3,506.00 55055001 6230 Bldg/Grnds - SrvCntrcts
900.00 56056001 6230 Bldg/Grnds - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493026 TOTAL: 5,870.59
493027 03/01/2024 PRTD 133504 AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 77742-Labor 01/31/2024 20240301 5,383.02
Invoice: 77742-Labor Contract extension 2024 &2025
5,383.02 15415400 6180 Elec Gen - Rep&Maint
AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 77742-Material 01/31/2024 20240301 1,061.60
Invoice: 77742-Material
1,061.60
E PWK23012.CONST.WAT . .
59005900 1605 Wat BS - PurchCIP
AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 77733-labor 01/30/2024 20240301 3,816.84
Invoice: 77733-labor Contract extension 2024 &2025
3,816.84 15415400 6180 Elec Gen - Rep&Maint
AID ELECTRIC CORPORATION 77733-material 01/30/2024 20240301 661.98
Invoice: 77733-material
661.98 12012000 6180 Fire Gen - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493027 TOTAL: 10,923.44
493028 03/01/2024 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 212596 01/30/2024 20240301 217.70
Invoice: 212596
217.70 55055001 6230 Bldg/Grnds - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493028 TOTAL: 217.70
493029 03/01/2024 PRTD 137833 PEREGRINE AWARDS AND PROMOTIONAL 17739 02/05/2024 20240301 493.00
Invoice: 17739 IQS Leadership Awards
493.00 10110100 6513 Admin Gen - SupOffice
CHECK 493029 TOTAL: 493.00
493030 03/01/2024 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 18430 02/13/2024 20240301 64.30
Invoice: 18430 PO 37982
4.30 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
60.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 3
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493030 TOTAL: 64.30
493031 03/01/2024 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 171Y-G69F-TWLN 01/26/2024 20240301 51.00
Invoice: 171Y-G69F-TWLN
51.00 16116102 6406 Spec Activ - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XVG-1PXV-Y9VR 01/27/2024 20240301 119.94
Invoice: 1XVG-1PXV-Y9VR
119.94 16116102 6406 Spec Activ - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XD4-JMFN-C36V 01/30/2024 20240301 19.98
Invoice: 1XD4-JMFN-C36V
19.98 14014001 6513 Gen Mntce - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NQX-QCC6-C7Y3 01/30/2024 20240301 2,200.00
Invoice: 1NQX-QCC6-C7Y3 Staff Walkies
2,200.00 55055001 6406 Bldg/Grnds - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XD4-JMFN-DNVQ 01/30/2024 20240301 26.24
Invoice: 1XD4-JMFN-DNVQ
26.24 14014001 6610 Gen Mntce - Saf Equip
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16QQ-GTQ9-FJ49 01/31/2024 20240301 22.71
Invoice: 16QQ-GTQ9-FJ49 pencils
22.71 52052001 6513 18-Hole - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19YL-3HHT-1H9F 01/31/2024 20240301 56.14
Invoice: 19YL-3HHT-1H9F
56.14 61061004 6610 PW Equip - Saf Equip
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VLF-WRVH-13Y3 01/31/2024 20240301 33.52
Invoice: 1VLF-WRVH-13Y3
33.52 63063001 6511 PW Fac - SupCustod
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GG4-CWHH-1NC3 01/31/2024 20240301 11.96
Invoice: 1GG4-CWHH-1NC3 Program Supplies
11.96 16116103 6406 Senior Cen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PVF-G69R-36GD 01/31/2024 20240301 23.92
Invoice: 1PVF-G69R-36GD Program Supplies
23.92 16116103 6406 Senior Cen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13YD-6K7M-3FLK 01/31/2024 20240301 32.13
Invoice: 13YD-6K7M-3FLK
32.13 14014001 6610 Gen Mntce - Saf Equip
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C7Q-QNYR-DTMF 02/01/2024 20240301 41.38
Invoice: 1C7Q-QNYR-DTMF
21.79 52052000 6406 Golf Gen - SupOther
19.59 52052000 6513 Golf Gen - SupOffice
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 4
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L7D-RYYW-GJHJ 02/01/2024 20240301 28.26
Invoice: 1L7D-RYYW-GJHJ
28.26 14014001 6610 Gen Mntce - Saf Equip
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 169H-9CDX-HHJQ 02/01/2024 20240301 44.48
Invoice: 169H-9CDX-HHJQ Fire Table
44.48
E FIR21008.MISCELLAN . .
40500000 6103 Fire CP - Prof Svrs
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L7D-RYYW-HFWL 02/01/2024 20240301 115.55
Invoice: 1L7D-RYYW-HFWL Program Supplies
115.55 16116103 6406 Senior Cen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GG4-CWHH-N33R 02/02/2024 20240301 43.94
Invoice: 1GG4-CWHH-N33R Toddler area gate latch
43.94 54054001 6406 Operations - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16WV-6Q4Q-TXH3 02/03/2024 20240301 74.72
Invoice: 16WV-6Q4Q-TXH3 Office supplies
74.72 51051000 6513 Admin/Ops - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L7D-RYYW-TJ1H 02/03/2024 20240301 118.35
Invoice: 1L7D-RYYW-TJ1H
118.35 55055001 6406 Bldg/Grnds - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PVF-G69R-WJH7 02/03/2024 20240301 285.51
Invoice: 1PVF-G69R-WJH7 Trash bags, dusters, fan
285.51 54054001 6511 Operations - SupCustod
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RNT-PNFN-XG4J 02/04/2024 20240301 94.88
Invoice: 1RNT-PNFN-XG4J
94.88 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CNW-4TDX-114Y 02/04/2024 20240301 42.75
Invoice: 1CNW-4TDX-114Y
42.75 14014000 6513 PW Adm Gen - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YFY-3G4Y-Y6YT 02/04/2024 20240301 194.75
Invoice: 1YFY-3G4Y-Y6YT Projector Stands
194.75 42100000 6410 Comm Gen - SupVidProd
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DJP-LWX6-33FF 02/04/2024 20240301 14.95
Invoice: 1DJP-LWX6-33FF Power Strip for Projector Stand
14.95 42100000 6410 Comm Gen - SupVidProd
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MLL-YLKR-3HH6 02/04/2024 20240301 70.07
Invoice: 1MLL-YLKR-3HH6
70.07 14014000 6406 PW Adm Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XPM-FH9C-1NKQ 02/04/2024 20240301 15.25
Invoice: 1XPM-FH9C-1NKQ
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 5
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
15.25 52052005 6406 Clubhouse - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FJ3-XFD7-G3KX 02/05/2024 20240301 30.75
Invoice: 1FJ3-XFD7-G3KX
30.75 55055001 6188 Bldg/Grnds - Telephone
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1J6D-PWHM-Q3RD 02/12/2024 20240301 -238.26
Invoice: 1J6D-PWHM-Q3RD
-238.26 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YTW-PR13-CJ1H 02/16/2024 20240301 -34.39
Invoice: 1YTW-PR13-CJ1H
-34.39 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493031 TOTAL: 3,540.48
493032 03/01/2024 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1361 02/09/2024 20240301 54.00
Invoice: 1361 PO 37871
54.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493032 TOTAL: 54.00
493033 03/01/2024 PRTD 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO ESA000626-1 02/05/2024 22200103 20240301 8,237.00
Invoice: ESA000626-1 2024 2500HD Chevy Plow Truck
8,237.00 42900000 6711 P&R ER - CapVh&Equp
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO ESA000629-1 02/05/2024 22200107 20240301 10,102.00
Invoice: ESA000629-1 2024 Chevy 2500HD Plow Truck
10,102.00 42900000 6711 P&R ER - CapVh&Equp
CHECK 493033 TOTAL: 18,339.00
493034 03/01/2024 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 327973 02/12/2024 20240301 379.91
Invoice: 327973 Uniform Pete Kneable
379.91 12012000 6203 Fire Gen - Uniforms
CHECK 493034 TOTAL: 379.91
493035 03/01/2024 PRTD 133689 AUER STEEL HEATING & SUPPLY COMPA 31817220 02/15/2024 20240301 345.26
Invoice: 31817220
345.26 17017006 6180 Bldg Maint - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493035 TOTAL: 345.26
493036 03/01/2024 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 035601 01/29/2024 20240301 15.70
Invoice: 035601
15.70 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 6
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 009967 11/03/2023 20240301 25.06
Invoice: 009967 Tax Exempt
25.06 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 014903 11/17/2023 20240301 -2.74
Invoice: 014903
-2.74 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 017035 11/27/2023 20240301 -74.89
Invoice: 017035
-74.89 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 023535 12/18/2023 20240301 -27.85
Invoice: 023535
-27.85 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 039924 02/12/2024 20240301 89.21
Invoice: 039924
89.21 61061006 6530 Fire Equip - ReprParts
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 040083 02/13/2024 20240301 47.49
Invoice: 040083
47.49 61061006 6530 Fire Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493036 TOTAL: 71.98
493037 03/01/2024 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271996.00 - 10 02/02/2024 20240301 16,835.00
Invoice: 23271996.00 - 10 Professional Services Brook Dr
10,101.00
E ENG23108.CONST.STRM.CONSULTING.
59005920 1605 Stm BS - PurchCIP
3,367.00
E ENG23108.CONST.SANI.CONSULTING.
59005910 1605 Sew BS - PurchCIP
3,367.00
E ENG23108.CONST.WAT .CONSULTING.
59005900 1605 Wat BS - PurchCIP
CHECK 493037 TOTAL: 16,835.00
493038 03/01/2024 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 4015 02/12/2024 20240301 145.00
Invoice: 4015 PO 37964
145.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493038 TOTAL: 145.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 7
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493039 03/01/2024 PRTD 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LMV428371 02/09/2024 20240301 314.82
Invoice: LMV428371 Laundry Equipment Rental
314.82 12012000 6151 Fire Gen - Equip Rntl
CHECK 493039 TOTAL: 314.82
493040 03/01/2024 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202591700 02/15/2024 20240301 377.05
Invoice: 0202591700 PO 37984
3.30 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
373.75 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202612800 02/15/2024 20240301 65.90
Invoice: 0202612800 PO 38016
1.65 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
64.25 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493040 TOTAL: 442.95
493041 03/01/2024 PRTD 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 162114 02/01/2024 20240301 1,563.13
Invoice: 162114
1,563.13 71071001 6136 Main Bldng - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493041 TOTAL: 1,563.13
493042 03/01/2024 PRTD 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 991841 02/01/2024 20240301 722.36
Invoice: 991841
722.36 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493042 TOTAL: 722.36
493043 03/01/2024 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0329336 01/31/2024 20240301 657.50
Invoice: 0329336 Well 10 Preliminary Study
657.50 59059002 6103 Wat Wells - Prof Svrs
BOLTON & MENK INC 0329335 01/31/2024 20240301 5,546.00
Invoice: 0329335 Construction Services Lift Sta
5,546.00
E ENG21001.CONST.SANI.CONSULTING.
59005910 1605 Sew BS - PurchCIP
BOLTON & MENK INC 0329413 01/31/2024 20240301 1,504.00
Invoice: 0329413 2023 Bridge Inspection & Struc
1,504.00 15100000 6103 Const Mgmt - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493043 TOTAL: 7,707.50
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 8
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493044 03/01/2024 PRTD 101010 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 927769359 01/30/2024 20240301 137.64
Invoice: 927769359
137.64 63063001 6180 PW Fac - Rep&Maint
BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 927769345 01/30/2024 20240301 359.80
Invoice: 927769345
359.80 15415400 6610 Elec Gen - Saf Equip
CHECK 493044 TOTAL: 497.44
493045 03/01/2024 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 85233454 01/30/2024 20240301 214.06
Invoice: 85233454 Curaplex Cloth (Silk) White adhesive Tape
214.06 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
CHECK 493045 TOTAL: 214.06
493046 03/01/2024 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 204220 02/14/2024 20240301 1,046.00
Invoice: 204220 PO 37985
16.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,030.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BOURGET IMPORTS 204219 02/14/2024 20240301 472.00
Invoice: 204219 PO 38019
8.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
464.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493046 TOTAL: 1,518.00
493047 03/01/2024 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114170495 01/31/2024 20240301 41.14
Invoice: 114170495 PO 37600
1.15 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
39.99 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380038 02/14/2024 20240301 1,262.42
Invoice: 114380038 PO 38137
8.05 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
1,254.37 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380037 02/14/2024 20240301 121.15
Invoice: 114380037 PO 37988
1.15 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
120.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114378435 02/14/2024 20240301 3,024.14
Invoice: 114378435 PO 38150
20.70 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
3,003.44 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 9
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380020 02/14/2024 20240301 303.80
Invoice: 114380020 PO 38020
2.30 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
301.50 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380021 02/14/2024 20240301 1,054.35
Invoice: 114380021 PO 38163
10.35 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
1,044.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493047 TOTAL: 5,807.00
493048 03/01/2024 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114352288 02/13/2024 20240301 4,688.95
Invoice: 114352288 PO 37970
4,688.95 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114352289 02/13/2024 20240301 756.15
Invoice: 114352289 PO 37971
756.15 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114376836 02/14/2024 20240301 439.40
Invoice: 114376836 PO 37968
439.40 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411974045 01/30/2024 20240301 -198.40
Invoice: 411974045 RMA 12922
-198.40 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493048 TOTAL: 5,686.10
493049 03/01/2024 PRTD 150972 BROKEN CLOCK BREWING COOPERATIVE 8455 02/09/2024 20240301 105.00
Invoice: 8455 PO 37863
105.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
BROKEN CLOCK BREWING COOPERATIVE 8454 02/09/2024 20240301 53.00
Invoice: 8454 PO 37864
53.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493049 TOTAL: 158.00
493050 03/01/2024 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1281814-1 02/01/2024 20240301 55.58
Invoice: WO-1281814-1
55.58 15515500 6406 Faclt Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493050 TOTAL: 55.58
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 10
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493051 03/01/2024 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 937605349 01/31/2024 20240301 444.60
Invoice: 937605349
444.60 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
CHECK 493051 TOTAL: 444.60
493052 03/01/2024 PRTD 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 01-2024-2851 01/31/2024 20240301 18,737.79
Invoice: 01-2024-2851 City Attorney
18,737.79 10110100 6131 Admin Gen - PrfSvLegal
CHECK 493052 TOTAL: 18,737.79
493053 03/01/2024 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2947433 02/14/2024 20240301 240.00
Invoice: 2947433 PO 37976
240.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2947434 02/14/2024 20240301 157.55
Invoice: 2947434 PO 37975
157.55 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2947435 02/14/2024 20240301 570.00
Invoice: 2947435 PO 37977
570.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948521 02/16/2024 20240301 95.80
Invoice: 2948521 PO 38179
95.80 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948522 02/16/2024 20240301 1,003.30
Invoice: 2948522 PO 38182
1,003.30 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948520 02/16/2024 20240301 29.55
Invoice: 2948520 PO 38180
29.55 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493053 TOTAL: 2,096.20
493054 03/01/2024 PRTD 160207 JASON THOMAS CARDINAL EPD24-2 02/05/2024 20240301 2,000.00
Invoice: EPD24-2
2,000.00 13013000 6103 Pol Ad Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493054 TOTAL: 2,000.00
493055 03/01/2024 PRTD 160004 PRO-DIRECT FLOORING INC FIR-02/24 02/05/2024 20240301 720.00
Invoice: FIR-02/24 144sqft tiles
720.00 12012000 6406 Fire Gen - SupOther
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 11
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493055 TOTAL: 720.00
493056 03/01/2024 PRTD 144099 CELLEBRITE INC INVUS265705 02/02/2024 20240301 6,900.00
Invoice: INVUS265705
6,900.00 13300000 6105 Investigat - Dues&Sub
CHECK 493056 TOTAL: 6,900.00
493057 03/01/2024 PRTD 160160 CHRISTIANSON'S BUSINESS FURNITURE 89346 02/09/2024 22300077 20240301 17,600.00
Invoice: 89346 Conference Chair Replacement
17,600.00
E ENG23113.MISCELLAN . .
40840800 6712 Eng CP - CapFur&Off
CHECK 493057 TOTAL: 17,600.00
493058 03/01/2024 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4182031955 02/01/2024 20240301 33.68
Invoice: 4182031955
33.68 63063001 6511 PW Fac - SupCustod
CINTAS CORPORATION 4182288328 02/05/2024 20240301 66.16
Invoice: 4182288328 mats
66.16 52100000 6203 Golf Dome - Uniforms
CINTAS CORPORATION 4182288394 02/05/2024 20240301 11.52
Invoice: 4182288394
11.52 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
CINTAS CORPORATION 4182288368 02/05/2024 20240301 78.65
Invoice: 4182288368 shop rags
78.65 52052000 6201 Golf Gen - Laundry
CHECK 493058 TOTAL: 190.01
493059 03/01/2024 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009010581 01/30/2024 20240301 1,290.00
Invoice: 42009010581 Senior Center-Facility Deep Clean - December 2023
1,290.00 16116103 6103 Senior Cen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493059 TOTAL: 1,290.00
493060 03/01/2024 PRTD 145926 CLEARWATER ANALYTICS LLC 611453 01/31/2024 20240301 1,134.05
Invoice: 611453 01/01/2024 - 01/31/2024
1,134.05 10800000 4706 Finance - Inc on Inv
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 12
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493060 TOTAL: 1,134.05
493061 03/01/2024 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0007539-02/24 02/08/2024 20240301 886.93
Invoice: 0007539-02/24 Acct no. 8772 10 789 0007539
886.93
E FIN21500.MISCELLAN .BB-COM .
10810801 6103 Fin Othr - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493061 TOTAL: 886.93
493062 03/01/2024 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0540232-02/24 02/08/2024 20240301 139.81
Invoice: 0540232-02/24 Account number 8772 10 614 0540232
139.81
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .TELEPHONE .
40840801 6188 Faclt CP - Telephone
CHECK 493062 TOTAL: 139.81
493063 03/01/2024 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103921124 01/31/2024 20240301 570.00
Invoice: 103921124 Pre-Employment Police Officer
570.00 10910900 6175 HR Gen - EmpExams
CHECK 493063 TOTAL: 570.00
493064 03/01/2024 PRTD 135711 CONFLUENCE INC 28239 01/30/2024 20240301 31,953.20
Invoice: 28239 Fred Richards Park Design Serv
31,953.20
E P&R23200.DESIGN&BID. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
CONFLUENCE INC 28241 01/30/2024 20240301 2,656.25
Invoice: 28241 5146 Eden - redevelopment sketchs
2,656.25 26026000 6136 HRA Admin - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493064 TOTAL: 34,609.45
493065 03/01/2024 PRTD 160926 COOK, NATHANIEL 24CAPF-COOK 02/09/2024 20240301 500.00
Invoice: 24CAPF-COOK
500.00 25000004 6103 Professional Services
CHECK 493065 TOTAL: 500.00
493066 03/01/2024 PRTD 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC 5459901 02/01/2024 20240301 62.72
Invoice: 5459901
62.72 61061004 6580 PW Equip - SupWelding
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 13
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493066 TOTAL: 62.72
493067 03/01/2024 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4190758 02/01/2024 20240301 1,519.00
Invoice: 4190758 Mats for Senior Center Entryway
1,519.00 16116103 6406 Senior Cen - SupOther
CHECK 493067 TOTAL: 1,519.00
493068 03/01/2024 PRTD 160780 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2656 02/09/2024 20240301 640.00
Invoice: IN-2656 PO 37846
640.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2732 02/15/2024 20240301 864.00
Invoice: IN-2732 PO 38107
864.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493068 TOTAL: 1,504.00
493069 03/01/2024 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 360245/1 02/02/2024 20240301 696.70
Invoice: 360245/1
696.70 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
CHECK 493069 TOTAL: 696.70
493070 03/01/2024 PRTD 160978 DELLAPENNA, MICHAEL 24CAPF-DellaPenna 02/09/2024 20240301 500.00
Invoice: 24CAPF-DellaPenna
500.00 25000004 6103 Professional Services
CHECK 493070 TOTAL: 500.00
493071 03/01/2024 PRTD 160849 DISRUPTIFY INC 20240115-01 01/14/2004 22400022 20240301 45,000.00
Invoice: 20240115-01 Edina Liquor Leadership Training and Implementatio
45,000.00 58158100 6103 Sthdl AdGe - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493071 TOTAL: 45,000.00
493072 03/01/2024 PRTD 142458 EDINA MARKET STREET LLC Q3-2023-SSD 10/13/2023 20240301 1,952.53
Invoice: Q3-2023-SSD Center Ramp - Q3 cleaning and maintenance
1,952.53
E ENG98002.MISCELLAN .SERVICES .
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493072 TOTAL: 1,952.53
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 14
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493073 03/01/2024 PRTD 103594 EDINALARM INC 101075 02/01/2024 20240301 228.00
Invoice: 101075
228.00 17017006 6188 Bldg Maint - Telephone
EDINALARM INC 102137 02/01/2024 20240301 1,250.44
Invoice: 102137
416.81 58058000 6250 50th AdGe - Alarm Serv
416.82 58158100 6250 Sthdl AdGe - Alarm Serv
416.81 58258200 6250 Grnd AdGe - Alarm Serv
CHECK 493073 TOTAL: 1,478.44
493074 03/01/2024 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-6123 02/09/2024 20240301 180.00
Invoice: E-6123 PO 37866
180.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-6122 02/09/2024 20240301 60.00
Invoice: E-6122 PO 37867
60.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493074 TOTAL: 240.00
493075 03/01/2024 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2613523 01/30/2024 20240301 1,831.68
Invoice: 2613523 CURAPLEX 50MM X 48MM FOAM ELETROLYTE
1,831.68 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
CHECK 493075 TOTAL: 1,831.68
493076 03/01/2024 PRTD 137540 EMSL ANALYTICAL INC 35178589 01/31/2024 20240301 35.70
Invoice: 35178589
35.70 71071002 6103 Range - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493076 TOTAL: 35.70
493077 03/01/2024 PRTD 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC P07098 02/02/2024 20240301 37.88
Invoice: P07098 BLK DRAW LATCH
37.88 12012000 6180 Fire Gen - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493077 TOTAL: 37.88
493078 03/01/2024 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-Z34735 01/30/2024 20240301 134.72
Invoice: 1-Z34735
134.72 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-9398412 02/02/2024 20240301 101.00
Invoice: 1-9398412
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 15
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
101.00 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-9398299 02/02/2024 20240301 4.41
Invoice: 1-9398299
4.41 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-514638 02/02/2024 20240301 10.56
Invoice: 69-514638
10.56 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-9398292 02/02/2024 20240301 2.34
Invoice: 1-9398292
2.34 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-514852 02/05/2024 20240301 310.52
Invoice: 69-514852
310.52 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-514906 02/06/2024 20240301 153.49
Invoice: 69-514906
153.49 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-9409288 02/06/2024 20240301 97.76
Invoice: 1-9409288
97.76 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-514968 02/06/2024 20240301 76.30
Invoice: 69-514968
76.30 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-514960 02/06/2024 20240301 92.54
Invoice: 69-514960
92.54 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
CHECK 493078 TOTAL: 983.64
493079 03/01/2024 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-13268 02/15/2024 20240301 440.00
Invoice: E-13268 PO 38122
440.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-13274 02/15/2024 20240301 750.00
Invoice: E-13274 PO 38106
750.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493079 TOTAL: 1,190.00
493080 03/01/2024 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0513231-2 01/25/2024 20240301 936.88
Invoice: 0513231-2 Neptune 360 H2O meter software
936.88 59059006 6406 Wat MtRead - SupOther
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 16
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493080 TOTAL: 936.88
493081 03/01/2024 PRTD 116492 BRIDGETOWER OPCO, LLC 745629485 08/03/2023 20240301 178.89
Invoice: 745629485
178.89 10210202 6120 Lic & Perm - AdvLegal
CHECK 493081 TOTAL: 178.89
493082 03/01/2024 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 809002 01/31/2024 20240301 15.00
Invoice: 809002
15.00 14014000 6406 PW Adm Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493082 TOTAL: 15.00
493083 03/01/2024 PRTD 136583 FLUID INTERIORS LLC 89692 02/22/2024 20240301 1,352.05
Invoice: 89692
1,352.05 63063000 6513 City Hall - SupOffice
FLUID INTERIORS LLC 89691 02/22/2024 20240301 4,130.09
Invoice: 89691
4,130.09 63063000 6513 City Hall - SupOffice
CHECK 493083 TOTAL: 5,482.14
493084 03/01/2024 PRTD 102727 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC IN001-1797173 01/30/2024 20240301 1,224.81
Invoice: IN001-1797173
1,224.81 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493084 TOTAL: 1,224.81
493085 03/01/2024 PRTD 104716 GALE-TEC ENGINEERING INC 3524 02/06/2024 20240301 14,306.00
Invoice: 3524 2024 Retaining Wall Replace
14,306.00
E PW22002 .CONSTRUCTN.CONSULTING.
14014009 6103 Retain Wal - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493085 TOTAL: 14,306.00
493086 03/01/2024 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 026807529 01/16/2024 20240301 88.99
Invoice: 026807529 Long Sleeve Class A Shirt - Martinez
88.99 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 026941121 01/30/2024 20240301 391.00
Invoice: 026941121 Duty Pants, Duty Shirts - Eckstein
391.00 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 17
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 026941173 01/30/2024 20240301 189.95
Invoice: 026941173 Duty Boots - Pedersen
189.95 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 026941174 01/30/2024 20240301 219.95
Invoice: 026941174 Duty Boots - Greene
219.95 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 026944705 01/30/2024 20240301 -32.57
Invoice: 026944705 Embroidery, Heat Transfer, cad cut - Pedersen
-32.57 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 026969915 02/01/2024 20240301 13.18
Invoice: 026969915 Shirt Embroidery - Eckstein
13.18 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027002859 02/05/2024 20240301 73.87
Invoice: 027002859 L/S Uniform Shirt - Rasmussen
73.87 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
CHECK 493086 TOTAL: 944.37
493087 03/01/2024 PRTD 160554 GARLAND/DBS INC 42785245076 12/28/2023 20240301 81,600.00
Invoice: 42785245076 CITY WIDE ROOF ASSESSMENT
81,600.00
E ENG22105.PRELIM DES.CONSULTING.
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493087 TOTAL: 81,600.00
493088 03/01/2024 PRTD 160231 BOLDENOW, CINDY GG240214 02/01/2024 20240301 2,900.00
Invoice: GG240214
2,900.00 16116105 4390 Prtnr Prog - Reg Fees
CHECK 493088 TOTAL: 2,900.00
493089 03/01/2024 PRTD 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 4010365 01/31/2024 20240301 456.35
Invoice: 4010365
456.35 59059003 6103 Wat Distr - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493089 TOTAL: 456.35
493090 03/01/2024 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9003157154 01/30/2024 20240301 130.32
Invoice: 9003157154
130.32
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SUPPLIES .
40840801 6406 Faclt CP - SupOther
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 18
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
WW GRAINGER 9003002095 01/30/2024 20240301 20.79
Invoice: 9003002095
20.79 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
WW GRAINGER 9002913680 01/30/2024 20240301 42.40
Invoice: 9002913680
42.40 71071001 6406 Main Bldng - SupOther
WW GRAINGER 9004446929 01/31/2024 20240301 32.71
Invoice: 9004446929
32.71 71071001 6180 Main Bldng - Rep&Maint
WW GRAINGER 9004446937 01/31/2024 20240301 566.08
Invoice: 9004446937
566.08 71071001 6180 Main Bldng - Rep&Maint
WW GRAINGER 9009379786 02/05/2024 20240301 17.06
Invoice: 9009379786
17.06 52100000 6530 Golf Dome - ReprParts
CHECK 493090 TOTAL: 809.36
493091 03/01/2024 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 4199 02/04/2024 20240301 372.00
Invoice: 4199
372.00 16116100 6103 Athltc Act - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493091 TOTAL: 372.00
493092 03/01/2024 PRTD 151092 HARDLINE EQUIPMENT LLC 42210352 01/31/2024 20240301 3,154.07
Invoice: 42210352
3,154.07 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493092 TOTAL: 3,154.07
493093 03/01/2024 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6681347 02/05/2024 20240301 17,197.76
Invoice: 6681347
17,197.76 59059005 6545 Wat Treat - Chemicals
CHECK 493093 TOTAL: 17,197.76
493094 03/01/2024 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000218078 12/31/2023 20240301 4,859.30
Invoice: 1000218078 Customer: HSP0007234
4,859.30
E FIN21101.MISCELLAN .M-HEALTH .
10810801 6103 Fin Othr - Prof Svrs
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 19
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493094 TOTAL: 4,859.30
493095 03/01/2024 PRTD 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC 72245784 02/05/2024 20240301 332.36
Invoice: 72245784
332.36 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493095 TOTAL: 332.36
493096 03/01/2024 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 247356 01/30/2024 20240301 8,179.90
Invoice: 247356 City Wide Solar Feasibility St
8,179.90
E ENG23114.PRELIM DES.SERVICES .
25000000 6103 CAS - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493096 TOTAL: 8,179.90
493097 03/01/2024 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 688948 02/13/2024 20240301 878.00
Invoice: 688948 PO 37972
878.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
HOHENSTEINS INC 688947 02/13/2024 20240301 76.50
Invoice: 688947 PO 38055
76.50 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
HOHENSTEINS INC 688717 02/13/2024 20240301 492.00
Invoice: 688717 PO 37967
492.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493097 TOTAL: 1,446.50
493098 03/01/2024 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 17844 02/14/2024 20240301 102.00
Invoice: 17844 PO 38119
102.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUCID BREWING LLC 17845 02/14/2024 20240301 202.00
Invoice: 17845 PO 38108
202.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493098 TOTAL: 304.00
493099 03/01/2024 PRTD 146337 INDUSTRIAL BATTERY PRODUCTS INC 80067654 01/31/2024 20240301 4,793.00
Invoice: 80067654 Braemar Arena-Zam Charger
4,793.00 55055003 6180 Ice Maint - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493099 TOTAL: 4,793.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 20
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493100 03/01/2024 PRTD 131548 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC IN4448947 01/30/2024 20240301 24.13
Invoice: IN4448947
24.13 71071001 6511 Main Bldng - SupCustod
CHECK 493100 TOTAL: 24.13
493101 03/01/2024 PRTD 160653 INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11344 02/09/2024 20240301 910.00
Invoice: 11344 PO 37736
910.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11471 02/14/2024 20240301 285.00
Invoice: 11471 PO 38099
285.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11486 02/14/2024 20240301 955.00
Invoice: 11486 PO 38120
955.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11472 02/14/2024 20240301 416.25
Invoice: 11472 PO 38098
416.25 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493101 TOTAL: 2,566.25
493102 03/01/2024 PRTD 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC 691726 01/10/2024 20240301 10,492.00
Invoice: 691726 Edina Public Works Pipeline Report - Early 2024
10,492.00 59059003 6575 Wat Distr - Printing
JESSEN PRESS INC 691723 12/29/2023 20240301 3,215.00
Invoice: 691723 January 2024 Edition:Edina
3,215.00 10410400 6123 Comm Gen - Mgzn/News
CHECK 493102 TOTAL: 13,707.00
493103 03/01/2024 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3657589 02/01/2024 20240301 1,303.00
Invoice: 3657589 PO 37673
1,303.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 383963 01/13/2024 20240301 -9.24
Invoice: 383963 RMA 12374
-9.24 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660681 02/15/2024 20240301 886.15
Invoice: 3660681 PO 38185
886.15 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660685 02/15/2024 20240301 433.70
Invoice: 3660685 PO 38193
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 21
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
433.70 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660684 02/15/2024 20240301 67.70
Invoice: 3660684 PO 38192
67.70 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493103 TOTAL: 2,681.31
493104 03/01/2024 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 518097 01/20/2024 20240301 -3.00
Invoice: 518097 RMA 12613
-3.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738872 02/15/2024 20240301 194.55
Invoice: 6738872 PO 37998
1.40 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
193.15 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CHECK 493104 TOTAL: 191.55
493105 03/01/2024 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484024 02/15/2024 20240301 273.57
Invoice: 2484024 PO 37953
.47 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
273.10 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484044 02/15/2024 20240301 55.40
Invoice: 2484044 PO 37990
1.40 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
54.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484038 02/15/2024 20240301 81.40
Invoice: 2484038 PO 38186
1.40 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
80.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484035 02/15/2024 20240301 754.61
Invoice: 2484035 PO 38176
5.60 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
749.01 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484036 02/15/2024 20240301 3,184.35
Invoice: 2484036 PO 38177
22.40 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
3,161.95 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484047 02/15/2024 20240301 33.40
Invoice: 2484047 PO 38025
1.40 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
32.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 22
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493105 TOTAL: 4,382.73
493106 03/01/2024 PRTD 105171 KEYS WELL DRILLING COMPANY INC 2023132 01/31/2024 20240301 31,877.50
Invoice: 2023132 Well Rehab- Well 17
31,877.50
E PWK23101.MISCELLAN . .
59005900 1605 Wat BS - PurchCIP
CHECK 493106 TOTAL: 31,877.50
493107 03/01/2024 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 27125751 01/31/2024 20240301 3,608.40
Invoice: 27125751 Eng Services Public Works Tren
3,608.40
E ENG22108.DESIGN&BID.CONSULTING.
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 27147404 01/31/2024 20240301 1,202.90
Invoice: 27147404 50th & France South Ramp Repai
1,202.90
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SERVICES .
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493107 TOTAL: 4,811.30
493108 03/01/2024 PRTD 160539 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPA 61815 11/30/2023 20240301 422,853.09
Invoice: 61815 Fencing and Demolition at 4401
422,853.09
E FIR21008.CONSTRUCTN. .
40500000 6713 Fire CP - CapBldStrc
CHECK 493108 TOTAL: 422,853.09
493109 03/01/2024 PRTD 160737 WEYAND COMPANIES LLC 000836 02/02/2024 20240301 115.00
Invoice: 000836
115.00 61061005 6180 Police Eq - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493109 TOTAL: 115.00
493110 03/01/2024 PRTD 160469 L-Z TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 115843-B 01/30/2024 20240301 1,260.00
Invoice: 115843-B
1,260.00 61061004 6556 PW Equip - Tool&Acces
CHECK 493110 TOTAL: 1,260.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 23
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493111 03/01/2024 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 6897 02/09/2024 20240301 116.00
Invoice: 6897 PO 37852
116.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493111 TOTAL: 116.00
493112 03/01/2024 PRTD 116876 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 11221622 01/31/2024 20240301 16.95
Invoice: 11221622 Over-the-phone and video interpretation
16.95 10410400 6103 Comm Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493112 TOTAL: 16.95
493113 03/01/2024 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9311267195 02/01/2024 20240301 994.95
Invoice: 9311267195
994.95 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493113 TOTAL: 994.95
493114 03/01/2024 PRTD 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 01-2024 01/31/2024 20240301 23,018.47
Invoice: 01-2024 File 0656.001
23,018.47 13013001 6131 Legal Srv - PrfSvLegal
CHECK 493114 TOTAL: 23,018.47
493115 03/01/2024 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 68210 02/13/2024 20240301 392.12
Invoice: 68210 PO 38032
8.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
384.12 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
LIBATION PROJECT 68212 02/13/2024 20240301 390.12
Invoice: 68212 PO 37993
6.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
384.12 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493115 TOTAL: 782.24
493116 03/01/2024 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 133972 01/31/2024 20240301 362.00
Invoice: 133972 Second year of monitoring and
362.00 15515500 6105 Faclt Gen - Dues&Sub
LVC COMPANIES INC 133973 01/31/2024 20240301 362.00
Invoice: 133973 Second year of monitoring and
362.00 15515500 6105 Faclt Gen - Dues&Sub
LVC COMPANIES INC 133974 01/31/2024 20240301 362.00
Invoice: 133974 Second year of monitoring and
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 24
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
362.00 15515500 6105 Faclt Gen - Dues&Sub
LVC COMPANIES INC 134870 02/12/2024 20240301 369.98
Invoice: 134870 Trouble on panel - Card 23 DACT
369.98
E ENG22112.CONSTRUCTN. .
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
LVC COMPANIES INC 134432 01/31/2024 20240301 362.00
Invoice: 134432 Second year of monitoring and
362.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
LVC COMPANIES INC 131844-Credit 02/26/2024 20240301 -1,650.00
Invoice: 131844-Credit
-1,650.00 59059002 6103 Wat Wells - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493116 TOTAL: 167.98
493117 03/01/2024 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P24279 01/11/2024 20240301 8,423.76
Invoice: P24279 Globe Mfg. GX3.0 Turnout Gear
8,423.76 12012000 6552 Fire Gen - ProtcClth
CHECK 493117 TOTAL: 8,423.76
493118 03/01/2024 PRTD 160471 MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION INC ENG 22-15 #16 02/05/2024 20240301 439,578.07
Invoice: ENG 22-15 #16 Sanitary Lift Station #6 Repla
439,578.07
E ENG21040.CONSTRUCTN.CNTRCT PMT.
59005910 1605 Sew BS - PurchCIP
CHECK 493118 TOTAL: 439,578.07
493119 03/01/2024 PRTD 147991 MAILMANAGER 23863 01/11/2024 20240301 5,276.80
Invoice: 23863 Mail Manager Renewal
5,276.80 62062000 6160 I.T. Gen - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493119 TOTAL: 5,276.80
493120 03/01/2024 PRTD 160297 MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC 2594 01/31/2024 20240301 2,860.00
Invoice: 2594
2,860.00 13013000 6175 Pol Ad Gen - EmpExams
CHECK 493120 TOTAL: 2,860.00
493121 03/01/2024 PRTD 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 15883 01/31/2024 20240301 625.00
Invoice: 15883
625.00 13013000 6103 Pol Ad Gen - Prof Svrs
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 25
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 15884 01/31/2024 20240301 350.00
Invoice: 15884 Feedback-Ben Kinne
350.00 12012000 6103 Fire Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493121 TOTAL: 975.00
493122 03/01/2024 PRTD 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0029141318 01/31/2024 20240301 320.20
Invoice: 0029141318 HRCM 400 CYLMGMTFEE
320.20 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0029141784 01/31/2024 20240301 79.06
Invoice: 0029141784 HRCM 400 CYLMGMTFEE
79.06 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0028972595 12/31/2023 20240301 320.20
Invoice: 0028972595 HRCM 400 CYLMGMTFEE
320.20 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0028973060 12/31/2023 20240301 79.06
Invoice: 0028973060 HRCM 400 CYLMGMTFEE
79.06 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
CHECK 493122 TOTAL: 798.52
493123 03/01/2024 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1175749/1175731 02/14/2024 20240301 804.12
Invoice: INV1175749/1175731 PO 38130
12.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
792.12 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1175757 02/14/2024 20240301 274.92
Invoice: INV1175757 PO 38131
3.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
271.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493123 TOTAL: 1,079.04
493124 03/01/2024 PRTD 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 11-14-2023 11/14/2023 20240301 1,911.00
Invoice: 11-14-2023 Duluth Trip
1,911.00 16116103 6103 Senior Cen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493124 TOTAL: 1,911.00
493125 03/01/2024 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 97572 01/31/2024 20240301 40.46
Invoice: 97572
40.46 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
MENARDS 97549 01/31/2024 20240301 263.32
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 26
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 97549
263.32
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SUPPLIES .
40840801 6406 Faclt CP - SupOther
MENARDS 97547 01/31/2024 20240301 328.70
Invoice: 97547
328.70 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
MENARDS 97627 02/01/2024 20240301 78.45
Invoice: 97627
78.45 55055003 6406 Ice Maint - SupOther
MENARDS 97691 02/02/2024 20240301 14.76
Invoice: 97691
14.76 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
MENARDS 97845 02/05/2024 20240301 74.80
Invoice: 97845
74.80 12012000 6180 Fire Gen - Rep&Maint
MENARDS 97837 02/05/2024 20240301 27.99
Invoice: 97837
27.99 12012000 6180 Fire Gen - Rep&Maint
MENARDS 97842 02/05/2024 20240301 263.72
Invoice: 97842
263.72 55055001 6406 Bldg/Grnds - SupOther
MENARDS 97497 01/30/2024 20240301 39.40
Invoice: 97497
39.40 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
MENARDS 97489 01/30/2024 20240301 23.47
Invoice: 97489
23.47 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
MENARDS 97506 01/30/2024 20240301 186.35
Invoice: 97506
186.35 56056001 6406 Bldg/Grnds - SupOther
CHECK 493125 TOTAL: 1,341.42
493126 03/01/2024 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 13448 02/15/2024 20240301 99.00
Invoice: 13448 PO 38101
99.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493126 TOTAL: 99.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 27
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493127 03/01/2024 PRTD 101996 WILCOCK ASSOCIATES INC 49320 02/02/2024 20240301 15.30
Invoice: 49320
15.30 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493127 TOTAL: 15.30
493128 03/01/2024 PRTD 160669 MIZUNO USA INC 8344400 RI 01/31/2024 20240301 153.80
Invoice: 8344400 RI
140.00 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
13.80 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493128 TOTAL: 153.80
493129 03/01/2024 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-48270 02/13/2024 20240301 400.00
Invoice: E-48270 PO 37979
400.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493129 TOTAL: 400.00
493130 03/01/2024 PRTD 100912 MOTOROLA INC 8230442351 01/31/2024 20240301 9,142.58
Invoice: 8230442351 E911 MCC7500 Support Annual Fee
9,142.58 21000000 6230 E911 - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493130 TOTAL: 9,142.58
493131 03/01/2024 PRTD 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 6219 01/31/2024 20240301 484.00
Invoice: 6219
484.00 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493131 TOTAL: 484.00
493132 03/01/2024 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1416983-00 02/02/2024 20240301 131.38
Invoice: 1416983-00
131.38 52052000 6406 Golf Gen - SupOther
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1417342-00 02/05/2024 20240301 50.15
Invoice: 1417342-00
50.15 52052000 6530 Golf Gen - ReprParts
CHECK 493132 TOTAL: 181.53
493133 03/01/2024 PRTD 104671 MUSCO CORPORATION 419970 01/31/2024 20240301 925.00
Invoice: 419970 Courtney Baseball Fields 2-4 S
925.00
E P&R23208.CONSTRUCTN. .
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 28
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
CHECK 493133 TOTAL: 925.00
493134 03/01/2024 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 218474 02/14/2024 20240301 447.50
Invoice: 218474 PO 38126
7.50 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
440.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
NEW FRANCE WINE CO 218475 02/14/2024 20240301 443.50
Invoice: 218475 PO 38187
7.50 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
436.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493134 TOTAL: 891.00
493135 03/01/2024 PRTD 142201 NLSC PRODUCTS INC 132292 01/31/2024 20240301 3,536.00
Invoice: 132292
3,536.00 63063001 6180 PW Fac - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493135 TOTAL: 3,536.00
493136 03/01/2024 PRTD 142880 NORDIC SOLAR HOLDCO LLC INV-NSH004207 01/31/2024 20240301 2,623.58
Invoice: INV-NSH004207 12/1/2023 - 12/31/2023
2,623.58 59059002 6185 Wat Wells - Elec&Solar
CHECK 493136 TOTAL: 2,623.58
493137 03/01/2024 PRTD 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 550807 02/02/2024 20240301 566.00
Invoice: 550807
566.00 14014007 6531 Trfc Safty - Sgns&Psts
NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 550808 02/02/2024 20240301 238.50
Invoice: 550808
238.50 14014007 6406 Trfc Safty - SupOther
CHECK 493137 TOTAL: 804.50
493138 03/01/2024 PRTD 144575 LANCER CATERING AT BRAEMAR GOLF C EDN20777 02/28/2024 20240301 2,132.74
Invoice: EDN20777 State of the Community meals
2,132.74 10410400 6136 Comm Gen - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493138 TOTAL: 2,132.74
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 29
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493139 03/01/2024 PRTD 160033 OLD WORLD BEER LLC 9169 02/14/2024 20240301 422.00
Invoice: 9169 PO 37737
422.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493139 TOTAL: 422.00
493140 03/01/2024 PRTD 999994 Price, Peyton Dog Leash-1/24 01/30/2024 20240301 50.00
Invoice: Dog Leash-1/24 Off-Leash Dog Area Permit Refund
50.00 13013004 4121 Anim Cntrl - PermOffLsh
CHECK 493140 TOTAL: 50.00
493141 03/01/2024 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 261026758 01/30/2024 20240301 45.00
Invoice: 261026758
45.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261025787 01/30/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261025787
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026973 01/30/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261026973
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026321 01/30/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261026321
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261025657 01/30/2024 20240301 45.00
Invoice: 261025657
45.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261025695 01/30/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261025695
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261027340 01/30/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261027340
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026439 01/30/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261026439
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026259 01/31/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261026259
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026568 01/31/2024 20240301 30.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 30
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 261026568
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026819 01/31/2024 20240301 45.00
Invoice: 261026819
45.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026110 01/31/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261026110
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261027157 01/31/2024 20240301 30.00
Invoice: 261027157
30.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261027094 01/31/2024 20240301 60.00
Invoice: 261027094
60.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261025184 01/31/2024 20240301 153.42
Invoice: 261025184
153.42 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
CHECK 493141 TOTAL: 648.42
493142 03/01/2024 PRTD 160967 OTG247 INC INV2433 01/30/2024 20240301 1,308.12
Invoice: INV2433
1,242.00 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
66.12 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493142 TOTAL: 1,308.12
493143 03/01/2024 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228333 02/14/2024 20240301 91.00
Invoice: 228333 PO 38036
4.00 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
87.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228334 02/14/2024 20240301 51.00
Invoice: 228334 PO 38035
4.00 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
47.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228320 02/14/2024 20240301 1,670.00
Invoice: 228320 PO 38152
24.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
1,646.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493143 TOTAL: 1,812.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 31
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493144 03/01/2024 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 33499613 02/12/2024 20240301 515.78
Invoice: 33499613
515.78 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493144 TOTAL: 515.78
493145 03/01/2024 PRTD 120831 1ST SCRIBE INC 261819 02/01/2024 20240301 425.00
Invoice: 261819 ROWAY
425.00 15300000 6103 Eng Serv - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493145 TOTAL: 425.00
493146 03/01/2024 PRTD 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 215731 01/31/2024 20240301 158.25
Invoice: 215731 water softener salt
158.25 54054001 6406 Operations - SupOther
CHECK 493146 TOTAL: 158.25
493147 03/01/2024 PRTD 160794 PILMARK LLC 208160-020124 02/01/2024 20240301 2,693.36
Invoice: 208160-020124
2,693.36 13013000 6201 Pol Ad Gen - Laundry
CHECK 493147 TOTAL: 2,693.36
493148 03/01/2024 PRTD 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 80852 02/05/2024 20240301 562.50
Invoice: 80852 Latex Gloves
562.50 13013000 6510 Pol Ad Gen - SupFrstAid
CHECK 493148 TOTAL: 562.50
493149 03/01/2024 PRTD 106341 MEDICAL PRIORITY CONSULTANTS, INC SIN355656 02/01/2024 20240301 3,873.00
Invoice: SIN355656
3,873.00 21000000 6230 E911 - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493149 TOTAL: 3,873.00
493150 03/01/2024 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 113079 01/31/2024 20240301 16,085.52
Invoice: 113079 2024 Milestone Annual Agreement
16,085.52 62062000 6230 I.T. Gen - SrvCntrcts
PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 113178 01/31/2024 20240301 940.00
Invoice: 113178 Access Control Origo Licenses Qty 200
940.00 62062000 6160 I.T. Gen - Sftwr&Data
PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 113196 01/31/2024 20240301 38,812.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 32
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 113196 Security System for Fire Station
38,812.00
E FIR21008.CONSTRUCTN. .
40500000 6713 Fire CP - CapBldStrc
CHECK 493150 TOTAL: 55,837.52
493151 03/01/2024 PRTD 160246 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 8365-01/24 01/01/2024 20240301 -1,684.93
Invoice: 8365-01/24 Acct:7900 0440 3620 8365
-1,684.93 10110100 6235 Admin Gen - Postage
QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 9732-01/24 01/09/2024 20240301 756.67
Invoice: 9732-01/24 Postage
378.34 15000000 6235 Eng Gen - Postage
302.67 14014000 6235 PW Adm Gen - Postage
75.66 17017000 6235 Prk Mnt Ad - Postage
QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC 9732-2/24 02/07/2024 20240301 1,814.12
Invoice: 9732-2/24
907.06 15000000 6235 Eng Gen - Postage
725.64 14014000 6235 PW Adm Gen - Postage
181.42 17017000 6235 Prk Mnt Ad - Postage
CHECK 493151 TOTAL: 885.86
493152 03/01/2024 PRTD 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH INC QLS27261 02/02/2024 20240301 891.86
Invoice: QLS27261
891.86 58058000 6180 50th AdGe - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493152 TOTAL: 891.86
493153 03/01/2024 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0081229-IN 01/30/2024 20240301 198.30
Invoice: 0081229-IN
198.30 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493153 TOTAL: 198.30
493154 03/01/2024 PRTD 144674 RAMPION USA INC UINV060284 12/08/2023 20240301 118.66
Invoice: UINV060284
105.00 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
13.66 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493154 TOTAL: 118.66
493155 03/01/2024 PRTD 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC 2015040049 02/13/2024 20240301 277.40
Invoice: 2015040049 PO 38153
277.40 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 33
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493155 TOTAL: 277.40
493156 03/01/2024 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 89050 01/31/2024 20240301 198.00
Invoice: 89050
198.00 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 89070 02/02/2024 20240301 1,454.25
Invoice: 89070
1,454.25 63063000 6180 City Hall - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493156 TOTAL: 1,652.25
493157 03/01/2024 PRTD 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 0000061793 02/02/2024 20240301 956.40
Invoice: 0000061793 VALVE BODY G2 SERIES
956.40 12012000 6180 Fire Gen - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493157 TOTAL: 956.40
493158 03/01/2024 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 814423 02/01/2024 20240301 39.71
Invoice: 814423
39.71 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 814128 02/01/2024 20240301 1,215.50
Invoice: 814128
1,215.50 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 815048 02/01/2024 20240301 9.90
Invoice: 815048
9.90 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
CHECK 493158 TOTAL: 1,265.11
493159 03/01/2024 PRTD 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO IN IA26619 02/05/2024 20240301 296.80
Invoice: IA26619
296.80 14014003 6406 Overlay Pr - SupOther
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO IN IA26648 02/05/2024 20240301 454.08
Invoice: IA26648
454.08 14014003 6406 Overlay Pr - SupOther
CHECK 493159 TOTAL: 750.88
493160 03/01/2024 PRTD 134173 SAFE-FAST INC INV286132 01/31/2024 20240301 65.00
Invoice: INV286132
65.00 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 34
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
SAFE-FAST INC INV286133 01/31/2024 20240301 107.80
Invoice: INV286133
107.80 17017001 6203 Mowing - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286134 01/31/2024 20240301 161.45
Invoice: INV286134
161.45 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286135 01/31/2024 20240301 139.65
Invoice: INV286135
139.65 59059001 6203 Wat GB - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286136 01/31/2024 20240301 274.45
Invoice: INV286136
274.45 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286137 01/31/2024 20240301 167.90
Invoice: INV286137
167.90 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286138 01/31/2024 20240301 73.00
Invoice: INV286138
73.00 61061004 6203 PW Equip - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286139 01/31/2024 20240301 126.35
Invoice: INV286139
126.35 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286140 01/31/2024 20240301 207.60
Invoice: INV286140
207.60 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286141 01/31/2024 20240301 71.95
Invoice: INV286141
71.95 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286142 01/31/2024 20240301 71.95
Invoice: INV286142
71.95 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286143 01/31/2024 20240301 77.95
Invoice: INV286143
77.95 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286144 01/31/2024 20240301 71.95
Invoice: INV286144
71.95 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286145 01/31/2024 20240301 71.95
Invoice: INV286145
71.95 14014000 6203 PW Adm Gen - Uniforms
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 35
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
SAFE-FAST INC INV286146 01/31/2024 20240301 143.90
Invoice: INV286146
143.90 59059001 6203 Wat GB - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286147 01/31/2024 20240301 89.50
Invoice: INV286147
89.50 15000000 6203 Eng Gen - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286148 01/31/2024 20240301 89.50
Invoice: INV286148
89.50 17017006 6610 Bldg Maint - Saf Equip
SAFE-FAST INC INV286149 01/31/2024 20240301 167.00
Invoice: INV286149
167.00 17017000 6203 Prk Mnt Ad - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286151 01/31/2024 20240301 268.00
Invoice: INV286151
268.00 59059001 6203 Wat GB - Uniforms
CHECK 493160 TOTAL: 2,446.85
493161 03/01/2024 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 93778013 01/30/2024 20240301 199.56
Invoice: 93778013
199.56 61061004 6584 PW Equip - Lubricants
SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 2400090202 01/31/2024 20240301 3,352.60
Invoice: 2400090202
3,352.60 61061004 6584 PW Equip - Lubricants
CHECK 493161 TOTAL: 3,552.16
493162 03/01/2024 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 93596583 02/02/2024 20240301 3,352.60
Invoice: 93596583
3,352.60 61061004 6584 PW Equip - Lubricants
SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 93779424 02/02/2024 20240301 603.61
Invoice: 93779424
603.61 61061004 6584 PW Equip - Lubricants
CHECK 493162 TOTAL: 3,956.21
493163 03/01/2024 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 126045 01/31/2024 20240301 748.26
Invoice: 126045
748.26 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493163 TOTAL: 748.26
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 36
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493164 03/01/2024 PRTD 160463 SANSIO INC INV0000007012 01/29/2024 20240301 4,656.00
Invoice: INV0000007012 Sansio SaaS EMS Subscription
4,656.00 12012000 6105 Fire Gen - Dues&Sub
CHECK 493164 TOTAL: 4,656.00
493165 03/01/2024 PRTD 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8106460273 02/01/2024 20240301 1,134.57
Invoice: 8106460273
1,134.57
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SERVICES .
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8106470185 02/01/2024 20240301 859.86
Invoice: 8106470185 Quarterly Billing 02/01/2024 - 04/30/2024
859.86 16116103 6103 Senior Cen - Prof Svrs
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8106470714 02/01/2024 20240301 1,064.19
Invoice: 8106470714 Quarterly Billing 02/01/2024 - 04/30/2024
1,064.19
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SERVICES .
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493165 TOTAL: 3,058.62
493166 03/01/2024 PRTD 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP B17925460 02/05/2024 20240301 8,095.45
Invoice: B17925460 WorkspaceOne Renewal for 2024
8,095.45 62062000 6160 I.T. Gen - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493166 TOTAL: 8,095.45
493167 03/01/2024 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 459515 01/08/2024 20240301 30,004.67
Invoice: 459515 50th Street & Grange Rd Profes
30,004.67
E ENG22016.DESIGN&BID. .
26126114 6710 EdenWil TIF - Cap Other
SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 459382 01/08/2024 20240301 7,355.09
Invoice: 459382 Professional Services for Eden
7,355.09
E ENG22016.CONSTRUCTN. .
26126114 6710 EdenWil TIF - Cap Other
SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 461035 02/09/2024 20240301 77,274.69
Invoice: 461035 50th Street & Grange Rd Profes
77,274.69
E ENG22016.DESIGN&BID. .
26126114 6710 EdenWil TIF - Cap Other
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 37
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493167 TOTAL: 114,634.45
493168 03/01/2024 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0017863 02/02/2024 20240301 37.70
Invoice: 0017863
37.70 62062000 6103 I.T. Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493168 TOTAL: 37.70
493169 03/01/2024 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN74233 02/13/2024 20240301 164.96
Invoice: MN74233 PO 38040
5.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
159.96 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SMALL LOT MN MN74196 02/13/2024 20240301 320.96
Invoice: MN74196 PO 38001
5.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
315.96 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493169 TOTAL: 485.92
493170 03/01/2024 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 127127014 01/31/2024 20240301 135.08
Invoice: 127127014 2,500 #10 window envelopes
135.08 14014000 6406 PW Adm Gen - SupOther
RJM PRINTING INC 127223012 02/02/2024 20240301 193.85
Invoice: 127223012 5,000 #10 Regular Standard Envelopes.
193.85 10410400 6406 Comm Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493170 TOTAL: 328.93
493171 03/01/2024 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2441989 02/07/2024 20240301 41.29
Invoice: 2441989 PO 37806/38482
.80 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
40.49 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2443322 02/09/2024 20240301 743.25
Invoice: 2443322 PO 37960
.80 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
742.45 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444594 02/14/2024 20240301 989.30
Invoice: 2444594 PO 38144
4.80 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
984.50 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444597 02/14/2024 20240301 1,390.72
Invoice: 2444597 PO 38165
17.60 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 38
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
1,373.12 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444591 02/14/2024 20240301 176.80
Invoice: 2444591 PO 38006
.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
176.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444592 02/14/2024 20240301 378.40
Invoice: 2444592 PO 38003
2.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
376.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444593 02/14/2024 20240301 224.80
Invoice: 2444593 PO 38147
.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
224.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444595 02/14/2024 20240301 41.29
Invoice: 2444595 PO 38005
.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
40.49 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444598 02/14/2024 20240301 2,383.53
Invoice: 2444598 PO 38154
6.33 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
2,377.20 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444596 02/14/2024 20240301 623.12
Invoice: 2444596 PO 38042
4.80 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
618.32 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493171 TOTAL: 6,992.50
493172 03/01/2024 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4901804.001 01/30/2024 20240301 200.01
Invoice: S4901804.001
200.01 63063000 6530 City Hall - ReprParts
CHECK 493172 TOTAL: 200.01
493173 03/01/2024 PRTD 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 16340.00 - 9 01/31/2024 20240301 6,574.33
Invoice: 16340.00 - 9 Braemar Park Trails and Natura
6,574.33
E P&R23208.DESIGN&BID. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
CHECK 493173 TOTAL: 6,574.33
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 39
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493174 03/01/2024 PRTD 102251 ST ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 44584-02 02/01/2024 20240301 6,169.08
Invoice: 44584-02
6,000.00 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
169.08 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493174 TOTAL: 6,169.08
493175 03/01/2024 PRTD 139006 STATE OF MINNESOTA 00000012483 01/26/2024 20240301 200,363.76
Invoice: 00000012483 Noise Wall to Assess Residents
200,363.76 44044000 6715 Streets - CapInfrast
CHECK 493175 TOTAL: 200,363.76
493176 03/01/2024 PRTD 139006 STATE OF MINNESOT MnDOT-2024-Finberg 02/20/2024 20240301 40.00
Invoice: MnDOT-2024-Finberg Certified Landscape Specialist Reg 2024
40.00 16000000 6104 Park Admin - Conf&Schls
CHECK 493176 TOTAL: 40.00
493177 03/01/2024 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 53963-A 02/14/2024 20240301 120.00
Invoice: 53963-A PO 37965
120.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493177 TOTAL: 120.00
493178 03/01/2024 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10199329 02/02/2024 20240301 294.00
Invoice: 10199329
294.00 57057000 6530 General - ReprParts
CHECK 493178 TOTAL: 294.00
493179 03/01/2024 PRTD 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC RG3567618 01/31/2024 20240301 255.00
Invoice: RG3567618 Rental, Friday Night Movie @ EP
255.00 54054000 6103 Admin - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493179 TOTAL: 255.00
493180 03/01/2024 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 547070966 01/18/2024 20240301 773.30
Invoice: 547070966 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
773.30 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 547119536 02/16/2024 20240301 422.93
Invoice: 547119536 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
422.93 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 40
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 547124244 02/20/2024 20240301 688.09
Invoice: 547124244 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
688.09 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493180 TOTAL: 1,884.32
493181 03/01/2024 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 37159987 02/08/2024 20240301 283.22
Invoice: 37159987
283.22 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
CHECK 493181 TOTAL: 283.22
493182 03/01/2024 PRTD 132051 RICHARD ALAN PRODUCTIONS 24EP011 02/26/2024 20240301 350.00
Invoice: 24EP011 Performance Date 3/07/24
350.00 54054000 6103 Admin - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493182 TOTAL: 350.00
493183 03/01/2024 PRTD 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 920202128 02/01/2024 20240301 457.78
Invoice: 920202128 Repair T3 scrubber
457.78 54054001 6180 Operations - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493183 TOTAL: 457.78
493184 03/01/2024 PRTD 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 849676248 02/01/2024 20240301 274.00
Invoice: 849676248
274.00 13300000 6105 Investigat - Dues&Sub
CHECK 493184 TOTAL: 274.00
493185 03/01/2024 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M28884 01/30/2024 20240301 1,072.00
Invoice: M28884
167.00 16000000 6103 Park Admin - Prof Svrs
285.50 10210200 6103 Cty Ck Gen - Prof Svrs
206.50 26026000 6136 HRA Admin - PrfSvOther
167.00 10210200 6103 Cty Ck Gen - Prof Svrs
246.00 10210200 6103 Cty Ck Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493185 TOTAL: 1,072.00
493186 03/01/2024 PRTD 103277 TITAN MACHINERY INC 19163714 GP 01/05/2024 20240301 171.41
Invoice: 19163714 GP
171.41 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
TITAN MACHINERY INC 19190213 GP 01/18/2024 20240301 -264.25
Invoice: 19190213 GP
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 41
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
-264.25 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
TITAN MACHINERY INC 19237931 GP 02/05/2024 20240301 484.10
Invoice: 19237931 GP
484.10 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
CHECK 493186 TOTAL: 391.26
493187 03/01/2024 PRTD 102742 TOLTZ KING DUVALL ANDERSON & ASSO 002024000228 02/02/2024 20240301 167,898.41
Invoice: 002024000228 DivergingDiamond Interchange C
167,898.41
E ENG23041.PRELIM DES.CONSULTING.
46046000 6715 MSA - CapInfrast
CHECK 493187 TOTAL: 167,898.41
493188 03/01/2024 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 40188735 01/31/2024 20240301 50.84
Invoice: 40188735
50.84 61061004 6580 PW Equip - SupWelding
CHECK 493188 TOTAL: 50.84
493189 03/01/2024 PRTD 151773 TOP GOLF USA INC 91601319 02/01/2024 20240301 7,238.44
Invoice: 91601319 License Fee
7,238.44 52100000 6160 Golf Dome - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493189 TOTAL: 7,238.44
493190 03/01/2024 PRTD 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 5028515964 02/03/2024 20240301 193.83
Invoice: 5028515964
193.83 71071000 6575 Admin - Printing
CHECK 493190 TOTAL: 193.83
493191 03/01/2024 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC PM5126 02/01/2024 20240301 1,257.19
Invoice: PM5126
1,257.19 55055003 6230 Ice Maint - Service Contracts
CHECK 493191 TOTAL: 1,257.19
493192 03/01/2024 PRTD 146952 TOUCHSTONE IQ LLC 000084-291 01/30/2024 20240301 21,200.00
Invoice: 000084-291 Building Energy Benchmarking S
21,200.00 25000000 6103 CAS - Prof Svrs
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 42
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493192 TOTAL: 21,200.00
493193 03/01/2024 PRTD 123649 MONROE TOWMASTER LLC 466574 01/30/2024 20240301 93.89
Invoice: 466574
93.89 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493193 TOTAL: 93.89
493194 03/01/2024 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 38848 02/13/2024 20240301 994.00
Invoice: 38848 PO 38009
18.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
976.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493194 TOTAL: 994.00
493195 03/01/2024 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2242180 01/16/2024 20240301 174.44
Invoice: PSI2242180 door work
174.44 55055001 6180 Bldg/Grnds - Rep&Maint
TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2244827 01/30/2024 20240301 78.46
Invoice: PSI2244827
78.46 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2245582 02/05/2024 20240301 1,300.00
Invoice: PSI2245582 West & East doors
1,300.00 55055001 6180 Bldg/Grnds - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493195 TOTAL: 1,552.90
493196 03/01/2024 PRTD 103973 ULINE INC 173804183 01/30/2024 20240301 80.41
Invoice: 173804183
80.41 59059003 6406 Wat Distr - SupOther
ULINE INC 174019860 02/05/2024 20240301 149.88
Invoice: 174019860 Gloves
149.88 54054001 6511 Operations - SupCustod
CHECK 493196 TOTAL: 230.29
493197 03/01/2024 PRTD 160648 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410038388 01/29/2024 20240301 28.14
Invoice: 1410038388
28.14 61061004 6201 PW Equip - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410039928 02/05/2024 20240301 9.10
Invoice: 1410039928
9.10 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 43
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410039927 02/05/2024 20240301 38.26
Invoice: 1410039927
38.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410039929 02/05/2024 20240301 47.04
Invoice: 1410039929
47.04 14014001 6201 Gen Mntce - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410039932 02/05/2024 20240301 54.77
Invoice: 1410039932
54.77 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410039930 02/05/2024 20240301 28.14
Invoice: 1410039930
28.14 61061004 6201 PW Equip - Laundry
CHECK 493197 TOTAL: 205.45
493198 03/01/2024 PRTD 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY E-35434 02/14/2024 20240301 101.00
Invoice: E-35434 PO 38110
101.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493198 TOTAL: 101.00
493199 03/01/2024 PRTD 100050 USPS 691947 02/26/2024 20240301 5,662.80
Invoice: 691947 Postage for Mar "Edition: Edina"
5,662.80 10410400 6123 Comm Gen - Mgzn/News
CHECK 493199 TOTAL: 5,662.80
493200 03/01/2024 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 061409 01/30/2024 20240301 552.32
Invoice: 061409
552.32 17017005 6406 Litter Rem - SupOther
VAN PAPER COMPANY 061409-01 01/29/2024 20240301 398.57
Invoice: 061409-01
398.57 17017005 6406 Litter Rem - SupOther
CHECK 493200 TOTAL: 950.89
493201 03/01/2024 PRTD 160036 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00620858 02/05/2024 20240301 621.26
Invoice: FL00620858 2024 QTR1 TPA Random Tests
621.26 10910900 6175 HR Gen - EmpExams
CHECK 493201 TOTAL: 621.26
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 44
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493202 03/01/2024 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5737 02/07/2024 20240301 180.00
Invoice: 5737 PO 37894
180.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5760 02/13/2024 20240301 160.00
Invoice: 5760 PO 38109
160.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5777 02/14/2024 20240301 279.00
Invoice: 5777 PO 38115
279.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493202 TOTAL: 619.00
493203 03/01/2024 PRTD 160968 VERIFIED HOLDINGS LLC 350057 01/31/2024 20240301 431.00
Invoice: 350057 Background checks
431.00 10910900 6103 HR Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493203 TOTAL: 431.00
493204 03/01/2024 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 03461242-IN 02/15/2024 20240301 538.75
Invoice: 03461242-IN PO 38011
2.50 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
536.25 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
VINOCOPIA INC 0346135-IN 02/15/2024 20240301 136.25
Invoice: 0346135-IN PO 38047
1.25 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
135.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493204 TOTAL: 675.00
493205 03/01/2024 PRTD 160301 VISION INC 129423 01/30/2024 20240301 1,313.22
Invoice: 129423 Feb. 2024 The Times
1,313.22 16116103 6575 Senior Cen - Printing
CHECK 493205 TOTAL: 1,313.22
493206 03/01/2024 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 70983883 02/02/2024 20240301 1,323.48
Invoice: 70983883
1,323.48 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493206 TOTAL: 1,323.48
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 45
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493207 03/01/2024 PRTD 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 13793 02/01/2024 20240301 1,240.57
Invoice: 13793
1,240.57 59059003 6103 Wat Distr - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493207 TOTAL: 1,240.57
493208 03/01/2024 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 259630 02/14/2024 20240301 1,826.00
Invoice: 259630 PO 38008
26.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,800.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE COMPANY 259633 02/14/2024 20240301 736.00
Invoice: 259633 PO 38045
12.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
724.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493208 TOTAL: 2,562.00
493209 03/01/2024 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00143753 02/15/2024 20240301 546.00
Invoice: MN00143753 PO 38013
546.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CHECK 493209 TOTAL: 546.00
493210 03/01/2024 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4895 02/14/2024 20240301 185.10
Invoice: 4895 PO 37981
185.10 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493210 TOTAL: 185.10
493211 03/01/2024 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-023788-000-2 12/29/2023 22300046 20240301 857.75
Invoice: R-023788-000-2 Arneson Acres ADA trail design services
857.75 40900000 6710 P&R CP - Cap Other
WSB & ASSOCIATES R-022715-000 - 9 01/29/2024 22300017 20240301 3,954.25
Invoice: R-022715-000 - 9 Braemar Park Courtney Fields Planning Services
3,954.25
E P&R23207.DESIGN&BID. .
40900000 6710 P&R CP - Cap Other
CHECK 493211 TOTAL: 4,812.00
493212 03/01/2024 PRTD 103410 WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC 112068 02/01/2024 20240301 1,050.00
Invoice: 112068
1,050.00 59059005 6180 Wat Treat - Rep&Maint
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 46
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493212 TOTAL: 1,050.00
493213 03/01/2024 PRTD 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 0196880-IN 02/01/2024 20240301 913.65
Invoice: 0196880-IN
913.65 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493213 TOTAL: 913.65
493214 03/01/2024 PRTD 160252 HANCE UTILITY SERVICE, INC. 35469A 02/03/2024 20240301 1,442.85
Invoice: 35469A 2024 & 2025 Electrical Locatin
1,442.85 15415404 6102 Elec Locat - Contr Svrs
CHECK 493214 TOTAL: 1,442.85
NUMBER OF CHECKS 195 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 2,614,305.80
COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 193 2,060,858.22
TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS 2 553,447.58
*** GRAND TOTAL *** 2,614,305.80
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 47
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
CLERK: JMartinez
YEAR PER JNL
SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT
EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC
2024 3 3APP 1000-2010 GF Bal Sh - Accts Pay 184,303.78 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 9999-1012 Control BS - CashAP 2,614,305.80 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005910-2010 Sew BS - Accts Pay 967,446.85 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 4200-2010 EquRep BS - Accts Pay 38,421.70 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005900-2010 Wat BS - Accts Pay 70,245.92 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5700-2010 Cent Lk BS - Accts Pay 1,294.00 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5100-2010 Art BalSh - Accts Pay 539.31 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5500-2010 Arena BS - Accts Pay 18,552.12 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5600-2010 Field BS - Accts Pay 1,086.35 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5800-2010 Liquor BS - Accts Pay 96,779.39 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 52005200-2010 Course BS - Accts Pay 8,817.00 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6100-2010 Equ Op BS - Accts Pay 17,791.61 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6300-2010 FacMgmt BS - Accts Pay 10,932.01 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 4000-2010 Cap Prj BS - Accts Pay 615,040.12 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5400-2010 EdinPrk BS - Accts Pay 3,584.68 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005920-2010 Stm BS - Accts Pay 10,101.00 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 7100-2010 PSTF BS - Accts Pay 2,457.98 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 52005210-2010 Dome BS - Accts Pay 7,321.66 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 26026000-2010 HRA Admin - Accts Pay 2,862.75 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 2500-2010 CAS BalSh - Accts Pay 30,379.90 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6200-2010 I.T. BalSh - Accts Pay 30,435.47 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 21002100-2010 E911 BS - Accts Pay 13,015.58 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 26126114-2010 EdenWil TIF - Accts Pay 114,634.45 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 4400-2010 PIR CP BS - Accts Pay 200,363.76
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 48
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
YEAR PER JNL
SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT
EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 4600-2010 MSA BS - Accts Pay 167,898.41 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
GENERAL LEDGER TOTAL 2,614,305.80 2,614,305.80
APP 9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 2,614,305.80
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 1000-1010 GF Bal Sh - Cash 184,303.78
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 59005910-1010 Sew BS - Cash 967,446.85
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 4200-1010 EquRep BS - Cash 38,421.70
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 59005900-1010 Wat BS - Cash 70,245.92
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 5700-1010 Cent Lk BS - Cash 1,294.00
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 5100-1010 Art BalSh - Cash 539.31
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 5500-1010 Arena BS - Cash 18,552.12
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 5600-1010 Field BS - Cash 1,086.35
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 5800-1010 Liquor BS - Cash 96,779.39
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 52005200-1010 Course BS - Cash 8,817.00
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 6100-1010 Equ Op BS - Cash 17,791.61
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 6300-1010 FacMgmt BS - Cash 10,932.01
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 4000-1010 Cap Prj BS - Cash 615,040.12
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 5400-1010 EdinPrk BS - Cash 3,584.68
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 59005920-1010 Stm BS - Cash 10,101.00
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 7100-1010 PSTF BS - Cash 2,457.98
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 52005210-1010 Dome BS - Cash 7,321.66
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 26026000-1010 HRA Admin - Cash 2,862.75
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 2500-1010 CAS BalSh - Cash 30,379.90
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
APP 6200-1010 I.T. BalSh - Cash 30,435.47
03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 49
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
YEAR PER JNL
SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT
EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC
APP 21002100-1010 E911 BS - Cash 13,015.58 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM APP 26126114-1010 EdenWil TIF - Cash 114,634.45 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM APP 4400-1010 PIR CP BS - Cash 200,363.76 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM APP 4600-1010 MSA BS - Cash 167,898.41 03/01/2024 20240301 JBM
SYSTEM GENERATED ENTRIES TOTAL 2,614,305.80 2,614,305.80
JOURNAL 2024/03/3 TOTAL 5,228,611.60 5,228,611.60
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 50
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
1000 General 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 1000-1010 GF Bal Sh - Cash 184,303.78 1000-2010 GF Bal Sh - Accts Pay 184,303.78
TOTAL 184,303.78 184,303.78
FUND TOTAL 184,303.78 184,303.78
2100 2100 Police SR /Emergency 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
21002100-1010 E911 BS - Cash 13,015.58
21002100-2010 E911 BS - Accts Pay 13,015.58
FUND TOTAL 13,015.58 13,015.58
2500 Conservation & Sustainability 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
2500-1010 CAS BalSh - Cash 30,379.90
2500-2010 CAS BalSh - Accts Pay 30,379.90
TOTAL 30,379.90 30,379.90
FUND TOTAL 30,379.90 30,379.90
2600 26000 HRA /HRA Admini 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 26026000-1010 HRA Admin - Cash 2,862.75 26026000-2010 HRA Admin - Accts Pay 2,862.75
26000 TOTAL 2,862.75 2,862.75
2600 26114 HRA /Eden Wilso 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
26126114-1010 EdenWil TIF - Cash 114,634.45
26126114-2010 EdenWil TIF - Accts Pay 114,634.45
FUND TOTAL 117,497.20 117,497.20
4000 Capital Projects 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
4000-1010 Cap Prj BS - Cash 615,040.12
4000-2010 Cap Prj BS - Accts Pay 615,040.12
FUND TOTAL 615,040.12 615,040.12
4200 Equipment Replacement 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
4200-1010 EquRep BS - Cash 38,421.70
4200-2010 EquRep BS - Accts Pay 38,421.70
FUND TOTAL 38,421.70 38,421.70
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 51
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
4400 PIR Capital Projects 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 4400-1010 PIR CP BS - Cash 200,363.76 4400-2010 PIR CP BS - Accts Pay 200,363.76
FUND TOTAL 200,363.76 200,363.76
4600 MSA tracking 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
4600-1010 MSA BS - Cash 167,898.41
4600-2010 MSA BS - Accts Pay 167,898.41
FUND TOTAL 167,898.41 167,898.41
5100 Art Center 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
5100-1010 Art BalSh - Cash 539.31
5100-2010 Art BalSh - Accts Pay 539.31
TOTAL 539.31 539.31
FUND TOTAL 539.31 539.31
5200 5200 Golf /Braemar Go 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
52005200-1010 Course BS - Cash 8,817.00
52005200-2010 Course BS - Accts Pay 8,817.00
5200 TOTAL 8,817.00 8,817.00
5200 5210 Golf /Braemar Go 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 52005210-1010 Dome BS - Cash 7,321.66 52005210-2010 Dome BS - Accts Pay 7,321.66
FUND TOTAL 16,138.66 16,138.66
5400 Edinborough Park 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
5400-1010 EdinPrk BS - Cash 3,584.68
5400-2010 EdinPrk BS - Accts Pay 3,584.68
FUND TOTAL 3,584.68 3,584.68
5500 Braemar Arena 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
5500-1010 Arena BS - Cash 18,552.12
5500-2010 Arena BS - Accts Pay 18,552.12
FUND TOTAL 18,552.12 18,552.12
5600 Braemar Field 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
5600-1010 Field BS - Cash 1,086.35
5600-2010 Field BS - Accts Pay 1,086.35
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 52
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
FUND TOTAL 1,086.35 1,086.35
5700 Centennial Lakes 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 5700-1010 Cent Lk BS - Cash 1,294.00 5700-2010 Cent Lk BS - Accts Pay 1,294.00
FUND TOTAL 1,294.00 1,294.00
5800 Liquor 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
5800-1010 Liquor BS - Cash 96,779.39
5800-2010 Liquor BS - Accts Pay 96,779.39
TOTAL 96,779.39 96,779.39
FUND TOTAL 96,779.39 96,779.39
5900 5900 Utl Fund /Water 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
59005900-1010 Wat BS - Cash 70,245.92
59005900-2010 Wat BS - Accts Pay 70,245.92
5900 TOTAL 70,245.92 70,245.92
5900 5910 Utl Fund /Sanitary S 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
59005910-1010 Sew BS - Cash 967,446.85
59005910-2010 Sew BS - Accts Pay 967,446.85
5910 TOTAL 967,446.85 967,446.85
5900 5920 Utl Fund /Storm Sewe 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 59005920-1010 Stm BS - Cash 10,101.00 59005920-2010 Stm BS - Accts Pay 10,101.00
FUND TOTAL 1,047,793.77 1,047,793.77
6100 Equipment Operations 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
6100-1010 Equ Op BS - Cash 17,791.61
6100-2010 Equ Op BS - Accts Pay 17,791.61
FUND TOTAL 17,791.61 17,791.61
6200 Information Technology 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
6200-1010 I.T. BalSh - Cash 30,435.47
6200-2010 I.T. BalSh - Accts Pay 30,435.47
FUND TOTAL 30,435.47 30,435.47
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 02/29/2024 13:28User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 53
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
6300 Facilities Management 2024 3 3 03/01/2024 6300-1010 FacMgmt BS - Cash 10,932.01 6300-2010 FacMgmt BS - Accts Pay 10,932.01
FUND TOTAL 10,932.01 10,932.01
7100 PS Training Facility 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
7100-1010 PSTF BS - Cash 2,457.98
7100-2010 PSTF BS - Accts Pay 2,457.98
FUND TOTAL 2,457.98 2,457.98
9999 Pooled Cash Fund 2024 3 3 03/01/2024
9999-1012 Control BS - CashAP 2,614,305.80
9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 2,614,305.80
FUND TOTAL 2,614,305.80 2,614,305.80
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 81
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR
1000 General 152,138.182100 Police Special Revenue 567.902300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 223.242500 Conservation & Sustainability 64,161.582600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 11,005.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 3,528.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 1,996.254000 Capital Projects 228,054.514200 Equipment Replacement 60,509.965100 Art Center 241.155200 Braemar Golf Course 23,602.195200 Braemar Golf Course 1,926.615300 Aquatic Center 130.505400 Edinborough Park 7,525.675500 Braemar Arena 39,718.755600 Braemar Field 900.005700 Centennial Lakes 13,996.805800 Liquor 209,344.425900 Utility Fund 78,971.815900 Utility Fund 67,355.745900 Utility Fund 196.225900 Utility Fund 68,116.336000 Risk Management 32,113.216100 Equipment Operations 33,448.076200 Information Technology 31,577.776300 Facilities Management 3,077.787100 PS Training Facility 1,379.879000 Payroll 536,321.359999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,672,128.86
TOTAL 1,672,128.86 1,672,128.86
** END OF REPORT - Generated by Jesus Martinez **
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 1
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493215 03/08/2024 PRTD 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22401301 02/06/2024 20240308 396.07
Invoice: 22401301
396.07
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .REPAIRS .
40840801 6180 Faclt CP - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493215 TOTAL: 396.07
493216 03/08/2024 PRTD 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM C27200 02/08/2024 20240308 160.00
Invoice: C27200 AARP Smart Driving Class
160.00 16116103 6103 Senior Cen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493216 TOTAL: 160.00
493217 03/08/2024 PRTD 101971 UNISOURCE ACQUISITION CORPORATION 233322-001 02/08/2024 20240308 52.41
Invoice: 233322-001
52.41 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
CHECK 493217 TOTAL: 52.41
493218 03/08/2024 PRTD 143143 TORRES, ARMANDO CHAVEZ 2688 02/01/2024 20240308 4,406.00
Invoice: 2688 Braemar Arena-Field - cleaning service
3,506.00 55055001 6136 Bldg/Grnds - PrfSvOther
900.00 56056001 6136 Bld/Grnds - PrfSvOther
TORRES, ARMANDO CHAVEZ 2691 02/01/2024 20240308 1,700.79
Invoice: 2691 cleaning
1,700.79 52100000 6230 Golf Dome - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493218 TOTAL: 6,106.79
493219 03/08/2024 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 916708307 10/16/2023 20240308 125.92
Invoice: 916708307
117.60 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
8.32 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493219 TOTAL: 125.92
493220 03/08/2024 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 917251601 02/12/2024 20240308 309.97
Invoice: 917251601
296.86 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
13.11 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493220 TOTAL: 309.97
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 2
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493221 03/08/2024 PRTD 160871 ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTEGRATION LLC 2424 02/08/2024 22300059 20240308 60,509.96
Invoice: 2424 Council Chambers Broadcast System Equipment Update
60,509.96 42100000 6710 Commun ER - Cap Other
CHECK 493221 TOTAL: 60,509.96
493222 03/08/2024 PRTD 146661 AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONNECTIONS IN 2024-26 01/18/2024 20240308 7,375.00
Invoice: 2024-26 Affordable house Monitoring Fees
7,375.00 26026000 6136 HRA Admin - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493222 TOTAL: 7,375.00
493223 03/08/2024 PRTD 120796 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS C152972 02/08/2024 20240308 187.00
Invoice: C152972 1-2024 Alerus Invoice
187.00 10910900 6160 HR Gen - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493223 TOTAL: 187.00
493224 03/08/2024 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 212960 02/12/2024 20240308 143.05
Invoice: 212960
143.05 55055001 6230 Bldg/Grnds - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493224 TOTAL: 143.05
493225 03/08/2024 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 18467 02/21/2024 20240308 184.10
Invoice: 18467 PO 38234
4.10 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
180.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 18465 02/21/2024 20240308 121.10
Invoice: 18465 PO 38272
4.10 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
117.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 18466 02/21/2024 20240308 193.10
Invoice: 18466 PO 38321
4.10 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
189.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493225 TOTAL: 498.30
493226 03/08/2024 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NTR-CW4K-G96R 02/06/2024 20240308 92.84
Invoice: 1NTR-CW4K-G96R soap
92.84 52052005 6511 Clubhouse - SupCustod
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19XC-3HF4-PGGX 02/07/2024 20240308 10.75
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 3
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 19XC-3HF4-PGGX
10.75 14014000 6406 PW Adm Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 14PV-LXKM-P3FY 02/07/2024 20240308 45.95
Invoice: 14PV-LXKM-P3FY Admin supplies
45.95 10110100 6406 Admin Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13JY-7TJN-TY1V 02/08/2024 20240308 39.40
Invoice: 13JY-7TJN-TY1V
39.40 13213201 6203 Emgcy Res - Uniforms
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XQK-PCVJ-XMJY 02/08/2024 20240308 9.88
Invoice: 1XQK-PCVJ-XMJY AOMGD Red Pull-Tite Security Seal (Package of 100)
9.88 12012000 6406 Fire Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 114P-Y6QC-3JH1 02/08/2024 20240308 96.58
Invoice: 114P-Y6QC-3JH1
96.58 63063000 6513 City Hall - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FGP-RQ44-4J7T 02/08/2024 20240308 19.98
Invoice: 1FGP-RQ44-4J7T
19.98 17017000 6406 Prk Mnt Ad - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 117T-XY3D-6Q4L 02/09/2024 20240308 25.44
Invoice: 117T-XY3D-6Q4L
25.44 15515500 6406 Faclt Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1J6D-PWHM-4TM7 02/09/2024 20240308 362.05
Invoice: 1J6D-PWHM-4TM7 IT Supplies
362.05 62062000 6409 I.T. Gen - SupComp
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YMR-YJ33-DKJL 02/10/2024 20240308 112.28
Invoice: 1YMR-YJ33-DKJL
112.28 61061004 6610 PW Equip - Saf Equip
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LYF-74T7-CFTK 02/10/2024 20240308 259.98
Invoice: 1LYF-74T7-CFTK Wireless HDMI Transmitter / Receiver Training Room
259.98 12012000 6409 Fire Gen - SupComp
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C36-VPM3-HV44 02/10/2024 20240308 28.86
Invoice: 1C36-VPM3-HV44
28.86 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FGP-RQ44-K6R3 02/10/2024 20240308 33.22
Invoice: 1FGP-RQ44-K6R3 Class supplies
33.22 51051002 6406 Instrucnal - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KHC-HNWF-K4T4 02/11/2024 20240308 124.28
Invoice: 1KHC-HNWF-K4T4 Vacuum bags/batteries
124.28 54054001 6511 Operations - SupCustod
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TM7-N44T-HKPT 02/11/2024 20240308 23.99
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 4
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 1TM7-N44T-HKPT
23.99 57057000 6406 General - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 171X-3D4Q-KKXC 02/11/2024 20240308 41.37
Invoice: 171X-3D4Q-KKXC
41.37 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WT3-R1CG-M6KP 02/11/2024 20240308 159.11
Invoice: 1WT3-R1CG-M6KP Election Supplies
159.11 10210201 6406 Elections - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11DW-CXPL-TPDF 02/12/2024 20240308 24.99
Invoice: 11DW-CXPL-TPDF
24.99 14014000 6513 PW Adm Gen - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1674-4N9J-V6MR 02/12/2024 20240308 -256.25
Invoice: 1674-4N9J-V6MR
-256.25 55055001 6511 Bldg/Grnds - SupCustod
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11DW-CXPL-V31J 02/12/2024 20240308 37.60
Invoice: 11DW-CXPL-V31J Office Supplies
37.60 16116103 6513 Senior Cen - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NH1-TJ3K-VVGM 02/12/2024 20240308 18.38
Invoice: 1NH1-TJ3K-VVGM
18.38 52052000 6406 Golf Gen - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XXC-WMNF-W613 02/12/2024 20240308 16.59
Invoice: 1XXC-WMNF-W613
16.59 58058001 6406 50th Sell - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19HD-PWKX-YXR3 02/13/2024 20240308 14.49
Invoice: 19HD-PWKX-YXR3
14.49 15000000 6513 Eng Gen - SupOffice
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1N3P-FKGY-1WTC 02/13/2024 20240308 114.46
Invoice: 1N3P-FKGY-1WTC
114.46 63063001 6406 PW Fac - SupOther
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11XL-W3VK-3746 02/13/2024 20240308 29.31
Invoice: 11XL-W3VK-3746
29.31 63063001 6180 PW Fac - Rep&Maint
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RK6-WTPD-4LPR 02/13/2024 20240308 58.79
Invoice: 1RK6-WTPD-4LPR
58.79 57057000 6406 General - SupOther
CHECK 493226 TOTAL: 1,544.32
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 5
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493227 03/08/2024 PRTD 101874 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 119085 12/28/2023 20240308 1,782.00
Invoice: 119085 Mid power Mobile radios installation
1,782.00 12012000 6103 Fire Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493227 TOTAL: 1,782.00
493228 03/08/2024 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500399547 02/06/2024 20240308 253.91
Invoice: 2500399547
253.91 58258200 6162 Grnd AdGe - CustodSvs
ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 2500399561 02/06/2024 20240308 147.36
Invoice: 2500399561
147.36 58158100 6162 Sthdl AdGe - CustodSvs
CHECK 493228 TOTAL: 401.27
493229 03/08/2024 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1379 02/20/2024 20240308 99.00
Invoice: 1379 PO 38412 / RMA 13051
99.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493229 TOTAL: 99.00
493230 03/08/2024 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1 422086-030124 03/01/2024 20240308 9,552.55
Invoice: S1 422086-030124 50th & France Retail
9,552.55
E ENG98002.MISCELLAN .SERVICES .
40840801 6103 Faclt CP - Prof Svrs
ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1 146354-030124 03/01/2024 20240308 368.31
Invoice: S1 146354-030124 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY
368.31 71071001 6182 Main Bldng - Garb&Recyc
CHECK 493230 TOTAL: 9,920.86
493231 03/08/2024 PRTD 100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 01P108688 01/19/2024 20240308 -90.00
Invoice: 01P108688
-90.00 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35526 02/23/2024 20240308 564.05
Invoice: 02P35526
564.05 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35715 02/26/2024 20240308 83.14
Invoice: 02P35715
83.14 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35680 02/26/2024 20240308 243.30
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 6
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 02P35680
243.30 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35745 02/27/2024 20240308 -155.80
Invoice: 02P35745
-155.80 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35806 02/29/2024 20240308 169.65
Invoice: 02P35806
169.65 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35816 03/01/2024 20240308 132.38
Invoice: 02P35816
132.38 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02P35818 03/01/2024 20240308 -169.65
Invoice: 02P35818
-169.65 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493231 TOTAL: 777.07
493232 03/08/2024 PRTD 102972 AT&T 497999 02/09/2024 20240308 120.00
Invoice: 497999
120.00 13300000 6160 Investigat - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493232 TOTAL: 120.00
493233 03/08/2024 PRTD 160974 BENJAMIN D SASS 26 02/12/2024 20240308 265.00
Invoice: 26
265.00 61061009 6530 Pk Mant Eq - ReprParts
CHECK 493233 TOTAL: 265.00
493234 03/08/2024 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 4021 02/15/2024 20240308 140.00
Invoice: 4021 PO 38100
140.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 4001 02/15/2024 20240308 285.00
Invoice: 4001 PO 37961
285.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 4041 02/20/2024 20240308 242.00
Invoice: 4041 PO 38216
242.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493234 TOTAL: 667.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 7
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493235 03/08/2024 PRTD 142186 BAYCOM INC EQUIPINV_047976 02/13/2024 22300080 20240308 60,258.00
Invoice: EQUIPINV_047976 Fire Toughbook Replacements
30,258.00 62062000 6409 I.T. Gen - SupComp
30,000.00
E FIN23503.MISCELLAN . .
10810801 6103 Fin Othr - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493235 TOTAL: 60,258.00
493236 03/08/2024 PRTD 160964 BEAUDRY OIL AND SERVICE INC 2564358 02/09/2024 20240308 14,736.97
Invoice: 2564358 Dyed Diesel
14,736.97 61061004 6581 PW Equip - Gasoline
CHECK 493236 TOTAL: 14,736.97
493237 03/08/2024 PRTD 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC 611799 02/09/2024 20240308 2,117.65
Invoice: 611799
2,117.65 55055001 6406 Bldg/Grnds - SupOther
CHECK 493237 TOTAL: 2,117.65
493238 03/08/2024 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202592300 02/15/2024 20240308 335.30
Invoice: 0202592300 PO 38172
3.30 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
332.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202592100 02/15/2024 20240308 113.65
Invoice: 0202592100 PO 38018
1.65 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
112.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202592000 02/15/2024 20240308 643.20
Invoice: 0202592000 PO 38170
6.60 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
636.60 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202661600 02/22/2024 20240308 237.65
Invoice: 0202661600 PO 38236
1.65 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
236.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202661700 02/22/2024 20240308 2,421.55
Invoice: 0202661700 PO 38456
28.05 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
2,393.50 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202670400 02/22/2024 20240308 553.30
Invoice: 0202670400 PO 38483
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 8
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
3.30 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
550.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202670200 02/22/2024 20240308 553.30
Invoice: 0202670200 PO 38486
3.30 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
550.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202661900 02/22/2024 20240308 309.23
Invoice: 0202661900 PO 38275
5.23 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
304.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0108022300 02/22/2024 20240308 75.49
Invoice: 0108022300 PO 38273
6.34 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
69.15 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0107995200 02/19/2024 20240308 105.98
Invoice: 0107995200 PO 38052
6.48 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
99.50 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202670300 02/22/2024 20240308 553.30
Invoice: 0202670300 PO 38485
3.30 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
550.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202662000 02/22/2024 20240308 436.95
Invoice: 0202662000 PO 38458
6.60 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
430.35 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0202696000 02/22/2024 20240308 65.90
Invoice: 0202696000 PO 38484
1.65 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
64.25 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BELLBOY CORPORATION 0108022400 02/22/2024 20240308 58.89
Invoice: 0108022400 PO 38322
3.39 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
55.50 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493238 TOTAL: 6,463.69
493239 03/08/2024 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5230141 02/12/2024 20240308 435.00
Invoice: 5230141
435.00 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5233325 02/21/2024 20240308 1,044.00
Invoice: 5233325 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT, PIZZA
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 9
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
1,044.00 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 5234005 02/23/2024 20240308 522.00
Invoice: 5234005
522.00 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493239 TOTAL: 2,001.00
493240 03/08/2024 PRTD 160981 OSTRANDER, RYAN 1013 02/12/2024 20240308 479.20
Invoice: 1013
461.25 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
17.95 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493240 TOTAL: 479.20
493241 03/08/2024 PRTD 101644 DICK BLICK HOLDINGS INC 269075 02/05/2024 20240308 66.49
Invoice: 269075 Art Supplies
66.49 51051002 6564 Instrucnal - SupArt&Crf
CHECK 493241 TOTAL: 66.49
493242 03/08/2024 PRTD 160887 BOBBY & STEVES AUTO WORLD WEST BL 264268 02/14/2024 20240308 109.99
Invoice: 264268
109.99 61061005 6180 Police Eq - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493242 TOTAL: 109.99
493243 03/08/2024 PRTD 130602 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPANY LLC 1183 02/22/2024 20240308 96.00
Invoice: 1183 PO 38418
96.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPANY LLC 1184 02/22/2024 20240308 120.00
Invoice: 1184 PO 38380
120.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493243 TOTAL: 216.00
493244 03/08/2024 PRTD 101010 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 927841986 02/12/2024 20240308 43.00
Invoice: 927841986
43.00 63063001 6180 PW Fac - Rep&Maint
BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 927842000 02/12/2024 20240308 377.01
Invoice: 927842000
377.01 57057001 6180 CLP Park - Rep&Maint
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 10
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493244 TOTAL: 420.01
493245 03/08/2024 PRTD 160335 CRITICAL TELEPHONE APPLICATIONS I 22939 12/31/2023 20240308 810.29
Invoice: 22939
810.29 58358301 6102 Ecom Sell - Contr Svrs
CRITICAL TELEPHONE APPLICATIONS I 23575 01/31/2024 20240308 759.46
Invoice: 23575
759.46 58358301 6102 Ecom Sell - Contr Svrs
CHECK 493245 TOTAL: 1,569.75
493246 03/08/2024 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 85244272 02/08/2024 20240308 48.00
Invoice: 85244272 Curaplex Select Nebulizer
48.00 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 85245723 02/09/2024 20240308 1,663.84
Invoice: 85245723 Solu-Medrol, 125mg
1,663.84 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
CHECK 493246 TOTAL: 1,711.84
493247 03/08/2024 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 204217 02/14/2024 20240308 1,086.00
Invoice: 204217 PO 38054
14.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,072.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BOURGET IMPORTS 204424 02/21/2024 20240308 410.00
Invoice: 204424 PO 38276
10.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
400.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BOURGET IMPORTS 204425 02/21/2024 20240308 366.00
Invoice: 204425 PO 38237
6.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
360.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BOURGET IMPORTS 204426 02/21/2024 20240308 430.00
Invoice: 204426 PO 38325
6.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
424.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493247 TOTAL: 2,292.00
493248 03/08/2024 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 098P6295 02/09/2024 20240308 244.42
Invoice: 098P6295
244.42 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 11
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493248 TOTAL: 244.42
493249 03/08/2024 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B375609 02/07/2024 20240308 4,029.00
Invoice: B375609
4,029.00
E P&R23208.CONSTRUCTN. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B375636 02/07/2024 20240308 517.50
Invoice: B375636
517.50 55055003 6103 Ice Maint - Prof Svrs
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B371070 01/02/2024 20240308 2,925.00
Invoice: B371070 Sanitary Sewer Lift Station #6
2,925.00
E ENG21001.CONST.SANI.CONSULTING.
59005910 1605 Sew BS - PurchCIP
CHECK 493249 TOTAL: 7,471.50
493250 03/08/2024 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380034 02/14/2024 20240308 50.30
Invoice: 114380034 PO 38158
2.30 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
48.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380032 02/14/2024 20240308 3,092.67
Invoice: 114380032 PO 38157
16.10 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
3,076.57 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380035 02/14/2024 20240308 1,915.50
Invoice: 114380035 PO 38164
11.50 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,904.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380033 02/14/2024 20240308 773.75
Invoice: 114380033 PO 38181
5.75 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
768.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114380036 02/14/2024 20240308 181.15
Invoice: 114380036 PO 38061
1.15 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
180.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476634 02/21/2024 20240308 194.65
Invoice: 114476634 PO 38279
1.15 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
193.50 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 12
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476636 02/21/2024 20240308 705.20
Invoice: 114476636 PO 38280
9.20 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
696.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476658 02/21/2024 20240308 177.15
Invoice: 114476658 PO 38240
1.15 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
176.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476659 02/21/2024 20240308 3,029.90
Invoice: 114476659 PO 38419
25.30 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
3,004.60 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476635 02/21/2024 20240308 121.15
Invoice: 114476635 PO 38281
1.15 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
120.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476637 02/21/2024 20240308 217.90
Invoice: 114476637 PO 38278
6.90 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
211.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476656 02/21/2024 20240308 121.15
Invoice: 114476656 PO 38329
1.15 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
120.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476657 02/21/2024 20240308 121.30
Invoice: 114476657 PO 38432
2.30 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
119.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476655 02/21/2024 20240308 2,418.14
Invoice: 114476655 PO 38429
23.00 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
2,395.14 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 114476654 02/21/2024 20240308 2,092.65
Invoice: 114476654 PO 38373
12.65 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
2,080.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493250 TOTAL: 15,212.56
493251 03/08/2024 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114452558 02/20/2024 20240308 248.00
Invoice: 114452558 PO 38411
248.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 13
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114452557 02/20/2024 20240308 30.80
Invoice: 114452557 PO 38409
30.80 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114452556 02/20/2024 20240308 34.00
Invoice: 114452556 PO 38220
34.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114452567 02/20/2024 20240308 301.00
Invoice: 114452567 PO 38217
301.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114450034 02/20/2024 20240308 2,554.50
Invoice: 114450034 PO 38218
2,554.50 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411968332 02/22/2024 20240308 -45.00
Invoice: 411968332 RMA 13090
-45.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411968333 02/22/2024 20240308 -25.50
Invoice: 411968333 RMA 13091
-25.50 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411968334 02/22/2024 20240308 -7.25
Invoice: 411968334 RMA 13092
-7.25 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411968335 02/22/2024 20240308 -27.70
Invoice: 411968335 RMA 13093
-27.70 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411968336 02/22/2024 20240308 -6.75
Invoice: 411968336 RMA 13094
-6.75 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 411968337 02/22/2024 20240308 -14.25
Invoice: 411968337 RMA 13095
-14.25 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114450033 02/20/2024 20240308 30.80
Invoice: 114450033 PO 38436
30.80 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 114450032 02/21/2024 20240308 828.50
Invoice: 114450032 PO 38307
828.50 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493251 TOTAL: 3,901.15
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 14
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493252 03/08/2024 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2944638 02/27/2024 20240308 1,855.25
Invoice: 2944638 PO 37727
1,855.25 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948525 02/15/2024 20240308 34.80
Invoice: 2948525 PO 38196
34.80 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2949003 02/16/2024 20240308 268.00
Invoice: 2949003 PO 38195
268.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2949126 02/16/2024 20240308 -26.67
Invoice: 2949126 RMA 13018
-26.67 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948526 02/16/2024 20240308 1,868.00
Invoice: 2948526 PO 38197
1,868.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2946378 02/16/2024 20240308 -22.13
Invoice: 2946378 RMA 13019
-22.13 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2950006 02/21/2024 20240308 1,440.00
Invoice: 2950006 PO 38226
1,440.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2950007 02/21/2024 20240308 1,611.35
Invoice: 2950007 PO 38224
1,611.35 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2950005 02/21/2024 20240308 139.10
Invoice: 2950005 PO 38225
139.10 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2950796 02/23/2024 20240308 1,557.00
Invoice: 2950796
1,557.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2950997 02/23/2024 20240308 676.80
Invoice: 2950997 PO 38460
676.80 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948988 01/19/2024 20240308 -8.63
Invoice: 2948988 RMA 12580
-8.63 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2950794 02/23/2024 20240308 849.00
Invoice: 2950794 PO 38451
849.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 15
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2951003 02/23/2024 20240308 244.00
Invoice: 2951003 PO 38474
244.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2951005 02/23/2024 20240308 1,458.00
Invoice: 2951005 PO 38473
1,458.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2951004 02/23/2024 20240308 140.25
Invoice: 2951004 PO 38472
140.25 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2951006 02/23/2024 20240308 810.00
Invoice: 2951006 PO 38471
810.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2948989 02/17/2024 20240308 -228.80
Invoice: 2948989 PO 13048
-228.80 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2953481 03/01/2024 20240308 103.50
Invoice: 2953481 PO 38533
103.50 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2953482 03/02/2024 20240308 319.95
Invoice: 2953482 PO 38532
319.95 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493252 TOTAL: 13,088.77
493253 03/08/2024 PRTD 148017 CARBON DAY AUTOMOTIVE 4139 02/09/2024 20240308 205.00
Invoice: 4139
205.00 25000000 6406 CAS - SupOther
CHECK 493253 TOTAL: 205.00
493254 03/08/2024 PRTD 160939 CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE C 02-2024 02/26/2024 20240308 2,794.12
Invoice: 02-2024 Feb 2024 Acc-CI-Hospital
2,794.12 9000 2033 Payroll BS - Acdtl&Crit
CHECK 493254 TOTAL: 2,794.12
493255 03/08/2024 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4182764006 02/08/2024 20240308 33.68
Invoice: 4182764006
33.68 63063001 6511 PW Fac - SupCustod
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 16
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493255 TOTAL: 33.68
493256 03/08/2024 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4183021374 02/12/2024 20240308 86.68
Invoice: 4183021374 mats
86.68 52100000 6203 Golf Dome - Uniforms
CHECK 493256 TOTAL: 86.68
493257 03/08/2024 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0373022-02/24 02/17/2024 20240308 34.80
Invoice: 0373022-02/24 Account number 8772 10 614 0373022
34.80 13013000 6103 Pol Ad Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493257 TOTAL: 34.80
493258 03/08/2024 PRTD 120433 COMCAST 0740105-02/24 02/18/2024 20240308 100.15
Invoice: 0740105-02/24 Account number 8772 10 614 0740105
100.15 54054000 6105 Admin - Dues&Sub
CHECK 493258 TOTAL: 100.15
493259 03/08/2024 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103926705 02/07/2024 20240308 2,387.00
Invoice: 103926705 Pre-employment Exams
2,387.00 10910900 6175 HR Gen - EmpExams
CONCENTRA 103929897 02/14/2024 20240308 1,690.00
Invoice: 103929897 Pre-employment exams
1,690.00 10910900 6175 HR Gen - EmpExams
CHECK 493259 TOTAL: 4,077.00
493260 03/08/2024 PRTD 160983 CONNECTWISE LLC INV01041983 01/23/2024 20240308 675.00
Invoice: INV01041983 ConnectWise Consulting time
675.00 62062000 6160 I.T. Gen - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493260 TOTAL: 675.00
493261 03/08/2024 PRTD 130171 CTM SERVICES INC 6826 01/23/2024 20240308 848.72
Invoice: 6826
848.72 55055003 6406 Ice Maint - SupOther
CHECK 493261 TOTAL: 848.72
493262 03/08/2024 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X95811804 02/29/2024 20240308 9.55
Invoice: 114X95811804
9.55 71071001 6406 Main Bldng - SupOther
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 17
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X95870503 02/29/2024 20240308 357.00
Invoice: 114X95870503
357.00 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493262 TOTAL: 366.55
493263 03/08/2024 PRTD 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO 2402-910780 02/12/2024 20240308 124.50
Invoice: 2402-910780
124.50
E FIR21008.MISCELLAN . .
40500000 6103 Fire CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493263 TOTAL: 124.50
493264 03/08/2024 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 4193482 02/07/2024 20240308 1,173.70
Invoice: 4193482
1,173.70 63063001 6511 PW Fac - SupCustod
CHECK 493264 TOTAL: 1,173.70
493265 03/08/2024 PRTD 160780 DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2734 02/15/2024 20240308 138.00
Invoice: IN-2734 PO 38134
138.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2733 02/15/2024 20240308 150.00
Invoice: IN-2733 PO 38135
150.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2729 02/15/2024 20240308 84.00
Invoice: IN-2729 PO 38124
84.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2800 02/22/2024 20240308 630.00
Invoice: IN-2800 PO 38489
630.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2801 02/22/2024 20240308 315.00
Invoice: IN-2801 PO 38370
315.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2802 02/22/2024 20240308 241.00
Invoice: IN-2802 PO 38391
241.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2803 02/22/2024 20240308 215.00
Invoice: IN-2803 PO 38390
215.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 18
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
DANGEROUS MAN BREWING CO LLC IN-2728 02/15/2024 20240308 126.00
Invoice: IN-2728 PO 38123
126.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493265 TOTAL: 1,899.00
493266 03/08/2024 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY K60245/1 02/08/2024 20240308 103.41
Invoice: K60245/1
103.41 14014001 6556 Gen Mntce - Tool&Acces
DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 360816/1 02/08/2024 20240308 121.01
Invoice: 360816/1
121.01 14014001 6556 Gen Mntce - Tool&Acces
CHECK 493266 TOTAL: 224.42
493267 03/08/2024 PRTD 123995 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES LLC 10255184T460 03/01/2024 20240308 1,252.54
Invoice: 10255184T460 Mar Braemer Arena
1,252.54 55055001 6230 Bldg/Grnds - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493267 TOTAL: 1,252.54
493268 03/08/2024 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 051616649X240220 02/20/2024 20240308 139.14
Invoice: 051616649X240220 ACCOUNT NUMBER 051616649
139.14 52100000 6188 Golf Dome - Telephone
CHECK 493268 TOTAL: 139.14
493269 03/08/2024 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 045419181X240219 02/19/2024 20240308 142.56
Invoice: 045419181X240219 cable
142.56 52052000 6188 Golf Gen - Telephone
CHECK 493269 TOTAL: 142.56
493270 03/08/2024 PRTD 160060 DOMACE VINO LLC 27730 02/21/2024 20240308 738.00
Invoice: 27730 PO 38331
18.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
720.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493270 TOTAL: 738.00
493271 03/08/2024 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3947828 02/07/2024 20240308 3,329.00
Invoice: 3947828 Client-Matter No.: 094802-00509
3,329.00 10710700 6103 Aff Hs Gen - Prof Svrs
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3947833 02/07/2024 20240308 179.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 19
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 3947833 TIF legal escrow 7001 France Ave
179.00
E DEV21002.MISCELLAN . .
26026000 6131 HRA Admin - PrfSvLegal
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3947829 02/07/2024 20240308 3,528.00
Invoice: 3947829 Pentagon Park TIF - legal adminisration
3,528.00 26126104 6131 Pentgn TIF - PrfSvLegal
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3947832 02/07/2024 20240308 984.50
Invoice: 3947832 Legal Services Rendered Through January 31, 2024
984.50
E DEV22106.MISCELLAN . .
26026000 6131 HRA Admin - PrfSvLegal
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3947834 02/07/2024 20240308 2,466.50
Invoice: 3947834 TIF escrow - 7200-50 France site
2,466.50
E DEV23200.MISCELLAN . .
26026000 6131 HRA Admin - PrfSvLegal
CHECK 493271 TOTAL: 10,487.00
493272 03/08/2024 PRTD 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 12/4/2023 02/16/2024 20240308 1,648.80
Invoice: 12/4/2023 4 Ballot counter and OmniBallot Maintenance
1,648.80 10210201 6102 Elections - Contr Svrs
CHECK 493272 TOTAL: 1,648.80
493273 03/08/2024 PRTD 101630 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION 163291 02/08/2024 20240308 575.48
Invoice: 163291 Co-Rec Adult Volleyball League - Winter
575.48 16116100 6406 Athltc Act - SupOther
CHECK 493273 TOTAL: 575.48
493274 03/08/2024 PRTD 160885 ELECTRO MECHANICAL CONTRACTING IN 14068 02/07/2024 20240308 41,815.31
Invoice: 14068 Courtney Baseball Fields 2-4 S
41,815.31
E P&R23208.CONSTRUCTN. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
ELECTRO MECHANICAL CONTRACTING IN 14062 01/03/2024 20240308 41,592.00
Invoice: 14062 Courtney Baseball Fields 2-4 S
41,592.00
E P&R23208.CONSTRUCTN. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 20
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493274 TOTAL: 83,407.31
493275 03/08/2024 PRTD 102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC 202714-1 09/11/2023 20240308 2,424.40
Invoice: 202714-1 Credit taken twice
2,424.40 40300000 6409 Finance CP - Comp & Accs
CHECK 493275 TOTAL: 2,424.40
493276 03/08/2024 PRTD 134730 EXPLORE EDINA Jan 24 Lodging Tax 02/27/2024 20240308 39,675.38
Invoice: Jan 24 Lodging Tax JAN 2024 Lodging Tax
26,686.26 10800000 4030 Finance - Lodg Tax
8,369.90 10800000 4030 Finance - Lodg Tax
4,619.22 54054001 4030 Operations - Lodg Tax
CHECK 493276 TOTAL: 39,675.38
493277 03/08/2024 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 229-006641 02/05/2024 20240308 8.00
Invoice: 229-006641
8.00 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-9408327 02/06/2024 20240308 10.56
Invoice: 1-9408327
10.56 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-9411982 02/07/2024 20240308 2.64
Invoice: 1-9411982
2.64 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-515305 02/12/2024 20240308 63.20
Invoice: 69-515305
63.20 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-515301 02/12/2024 20240308 32.13
Invoice: 69-515301
32.13 61061005 6530 Police Eq - ReprParts
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-515369 02/12/2024 20240308 282.48
Invoice: 69-515369
282.48 61061006 6530 Fire Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493277 TOTAL: 399.01
493278 03/08/2024 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-13315 02/16/2024 20240308 70.00
Invoice: E-13315 PO 38138
70.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-13282 02/16/2024 20240308 201.00
Invoice: E-13282 PO 38140
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 21
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
201.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-13273 02/15/2024 20240308 275.00
Invoice: E-13273 PO 38105
275.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-13269 02/15/2024 20240308 140.00
Invoice: E-13269 PO 38121
140.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493278 TOTAL: 686.00
493279 03/08/2024 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0514376-1 01/24/2024 20240308 23,100.00
Invoice: 0514376-1 Neptune 360 H2O meter software
17,500.00 59059006 6530 Wat MtRead - ReprParts
5,600.00 59059006 6180 Wat MtRead - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493279 TOTAL: 23,100.00
493280 03/08/2024 PRTD 116492 BRIDGETOWER OPCO, LLC 1007252882 02/08/2024 20240308 152.00
Invoice: 1007252882
152.00 10210202 6120 Lic & Perm - AdvLegal
CHECK 493280 TOTAL: 152.00
493281 03/08/2024 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027015222 02/06/2024 20240308 409.16
Invoice: 027015222 Uniform Pants / Shirts / Tapering - Pedersen
409.16 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027026735 02/07/2024 20240308 170.97
Invoice: 027026735 DISPOSABLE TRANZPORT HOOD 5/PACK - Zech
170.97 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027026743 02/07/2024 20240308 446.41
Invoice: 027026743 New Officer Uniform Equipment - VanPelt
446.41 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027038251 02/08/2024 20240308 226.50
Invoice: 027038251 DUTYGUARD HT+ PULLOVER - Hallberg
226.50 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027038252 02/08/2024 20240308 226.50
Invoice: 027038252 DUTYGUARD HT+ PULLOVER - Doyle
226.50 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027038264 02/08/2024 20240308 139.84
Invoice: 027038264 1/4 Zip Sweatshirt - Cizek
139.84 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 22
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027049813 02/09/2024 20240308 217.48
Invoice: 027049813 4 Undervest Shirts - Pedersen
217.48 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027049817 02/09/2024 20240308 88.00
Invoice: 027049817 Uniform Pants - VanPelt
88.00 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027049850 02/09/2024 20240308 153.37
Invoice: 027049850 TLR-1 HL Gun Mount - VanPelt
153.37 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027070427 02/12/2024 20240308 334.22
Invoice: 027070427 Shield W/Eagle Badge - Heckert
334.22 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 027071069 02/12/2024 20240308 -1,565.00
Invoice: 027071069 Cadet Rockers - Heckert
-1,565.00 13013000 6203 Pol Ad Gen - Uniforms
CHECK 493281 TOTAL: 847.45
493282 03/08/2024 PRTD 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 1291 11/16/2023 20240308 175.50
Invoice: 1291
175.50 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493282 TOTAL: 175.50
493283 03/08/2024 PRTD 160943 GIESENBRAU BIER CO 20873 02/22/2024 20240308 385.00
Invoice: 20873 PO 38416
385.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
GIESENBRAU BIER CO 20874 02/22/2024 20240308 400.00
Invoice: 20874 PO 38369
400.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
GIESENBRAU BIER CO 20875 02/22/2024 20240308 175.00
Invoice: 20875 PO 38413
175.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493283 TOTAL: 960.00
493284 03/08/2024 PRTD 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LL 241768 02/08/2024 20240308 722.00
Invoice: 241768
722.00 52052005 6103 Clubhouse - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493284 TOTAL: 722.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 23
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493285 03/08/2024 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9015617161 02/09/2024 20240308 3.97
Invoice: 9015617161
3.97 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
CHECK 493285 TOTAL: 3.97
493286 03/08/2024 PRTD 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 273428-1 02/07/2024 20240308 223.24
Invoice: 273428-1
223.24 23023000 6406 PACS Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493286 TOTAL: 223.24
493287 03/08/2024 PRTD 137831 TRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSIT CIV-1936 02/12/2024 20240308 161.00
Invoice: CIV-1936 Edina Adopt-a-Drain Packets
161.00 59259205 6103 Stm EngSrv - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493287 TOTAL: 161.00
493288 03/08/2024 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 4240 02/11/2024 20240308 372.00
Invoice: 4240
372.00 16116100 6406 Athltc Act - SupOther
CHECK 493288 TOTAL: 372.00
493289 03/08/2024 PRTD 160611 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC 51982 02/12/2024 20240308 703.50
Invoice: 51982 Interlachen Easements
703.50 15000000 6103 Eng Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493289 TOTAL: 703.50
493290 03/08/2024 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6683174 02/07/2024 20240308 5,121.60
Invoice: 6683174
5,121.60 59059005 6545 Wat Treat - Chemicals
CHECK 493290 TOTAL: 5,121.60
493291 03/08/2024 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-5665 02/16/2024 20240308 173.00
Invoice: E-5665 PO 38136
173.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493291 TOTAL: 173.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 24
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493292 03/08/2024 PRTD 122093 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 127597629 02/09/2024 20240308 518,107.45
Invoice: 127597629 03-2024 HP Invoice-actives
518,107.45 9000 2012 Payroll BS - Health Ins
GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 127587472 02/09/2024 20240308 22,039.82
Invoice: 127587472 03-2024 HP Invoice-nonactives
22,039.82 60060004 6043 Other Insr - Cobra
CHECK 493292 TOTAL: 540,147.27
493293 03/08/2024 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000220771 02/26/2024 20240308 894.57
Invoice: 1000220771
894.57 71071002 6136 Range - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493293 TOTAL: 894.57
493294 03/08/2024 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000220772 02/26/2024 20240308 72.00
Invoice: 1000220772 Hazardous Waste License 2024 Edina Art Center
72.00 51051000 6105 Admin/Ops - Dues&Sub
CHECK 493294 TOTAL: 72.00
493295 03/08/2024 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000219654 02/23/2024 20240308 694.00
Invoice: 1000219654 Cust # CCR0000090
694.00 13013001 6225 Legal Srv - Prison Fee
CHECK 493295 TOTAL: 694.00
493296 03/08/2024 PRTD 160008 RACHEL PETERSON 3417 02/08/2024 20240308 1,866.72
Invoice: 3417 January 2024 HPC Consultant Fees
1,866.72 10510500 6103 Plan Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493296 TOTAL: 1,866.72
493297 03/08/2024 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 247514 02/06/2024 20240308 820.20
Invoice: 247514 Edinborough Park BAS Design
820.20
E ENG22109.DESIGN&BID. .
25000000 6710 CAS - Cap Other
HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 247512 02/06/2024 20240308 5,870.13
Invoice: 247512 City Hall Design Services for
5,870.13
E ENG22110.DESIGN&BID. .
25000000 6710 CAS - Cap Other
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 25
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493297 TOTAL: 6,690.33
493298 03/08/2024 PRTD 160637 HGS LLC IN43828 02/08/2024 20240308 1,511.25
Invoice: IN43828
1,511.25 40840800 6103 Eng CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493298 TOTAL: 1,511.25
493299 03/08/2024 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 688946 02/13/2024 20240308 1,778.70
Invoice: 688946 PO 38068
1,778.70 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
HOHENSTEINS INC 688944 02/13/2024 20240308 599.00
Invoice: 688944 PO 38070
599.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
HOHENSTEINS INC 688945 02/13/2024 20240308 108.00
Invoice: 688945 PO 38069
108.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
HOHENSTEINS INC 688716 02/13/2024 20240308 657.00
Invoice: 688716 PO 37966
657.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
HOHENSTEINS INC 690860 02/20/2024 20240308 2,883.00
Invoice: 690860 PO 38221
2,883.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
HOHENSTEINS INC 690858 02/20/2024 20240308 1,716.00
Invoice: 690858 38223
1,716.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
HOHENSTEINS INC 690859 02/20/2024 20240308 54.00
Invoice: 690859 PO 38222
54.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
HOHENSTEINS INC 690508 02/20/2024 20240308 993.75
Invoice: 690508 PO 38210
993.75 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
HOHENSTEINS INC 690509 01/30/2024 20240308 -612.00
Invoice: 690509 RMA 12923
-612.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
HOHENSTEINS INC 690510 02/20/2024 20240308 174.00
Invoice: 690510 PO 38209
174.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
HOHENSTEINS INC 690846 02/20/2024 20240308 473.00
Invoice: 690846 PO 38319
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 26
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
473.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
HOHENSTEINS INC 690845 02/20/2024 20240308 27.00
Invoice: 690845 PO 38323
27.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
HOHENSTEINS INC 690507 02/17/2024 20240308 -9.00
Invoice: 690507 RMA 13041
-9.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
HOHENSTEINS INC 690844 02/20/2024 20240308 472.50
Invoice: 690844 PO 38320
472.50 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493299 TOTAL: 9,314.95
493300 03/08/2024 PRTD 101618 HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL 464268 02/12/2024 20240308 17,846.81
Invoice: 464268
17,846.81 13013004 6136 Anim Cntrl - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493300 TOTAL: 17,846.81
493301 03/08/2024 PRTD 160559 HUMERATECH INC 230942 12/31/2023 20240308 55,766.25
Invoice: 230942 City Hall Energy & Lighting Im
55,766.25
E ENG22110.CONSTRUCTN. .
25000000 6710 CAS - Cap Other
CHECK 493301 TOTAL: 55,766.25
493302 03/08/2024 PRTD 129508 IMPACT MAILING OF MINNESOTA INC 209571 02/06/2024 20240308 2,879.05
Invoice: 209571 Monthly 12/29/2023-2/1/2024
2,879.05 59059000 6103 Wat UB - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493302 TOTAL: 2,879.05
493303 03/08/2024 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 17857 02/14/2024 20240308 72.00
Invoice: 17857 PO 38141
72.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
LUCID BREWING LLC 17846 02/14/2024 20240308 195.00
Invoice: 17846 PO 38142
195.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUCID BREWING LLC 17882 02/21/2024 20240308 102.00
Invoice: 17882 PO 38381
102.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 27
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
LUCID BREWING LLC 17880 02/21/2024 20240308 216.00
Invoice: 17880 PO 38395
216.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493303 TOTAL: 585.00
493304 03/08/2024 PRTD 160653 INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11484 02/14/2024 20240308 180.00
Invoice: 11484 PO 38148
180.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11661 02/21/2024 20240308 338.60
Invoice: 11661 PO 38404
338.60 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11660 02/21/2024 20240308 399.35
Invoice: 11660 PO 38382
399.35 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11652 02/21/2024 20240308 490.00
Invoice: 11652 PO 38396
490.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
INSIGHT BREWING COMPANY LLC 11653 02/21/2024 20240308 146.25
Invoice: 11653 PO 38398
146.25 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493304 TOTAL: 1,554.20
493305 03/08/2024 PRTD 160597 INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRODUCTS 149633 02/09/2024 20240308 86.50
Invoice: 149633
86.50 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
CHECK 493305 TOTAL: 86.50
493306 03/08/2024 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Jan STMT 2024 02/20/2024 20240308 83.78
Invoice: Jan STMT 2024 1/1/2024 and 1/31/2024 (Biermaier Retirement)
83.78 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
CHECK 493306 TOTAL: 83.78
493307 03/08/2024 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Golf-02/2024 02/25/2024 20240308 169.09
Invoice: Golf-02/2024 Acct: 252162 Job:15
169.09 52052000 6406 Golf Gen - SupOther
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Fire-02/2024 02/25/2024 20240308 69.97
Invoice: Fire-02/2024 Acct: 252162 Job:11
69.97 12012000 6406 Fire Gen - SupOther
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 28
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Pol-02/2024 02/25/2024 20240308 253.09
Invoice: Pol-02/2024 Acct: 252162 Job:9
253.09 13013000 6406 Pol Ad Gen - SupOther
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Facilities-02/2024 02/25/2024 20240308 156.43
Invoice: Facilities-02/2024 Acct: 252162 Job:2
20.68
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SUPPLIES .
40840801 6406 Faclt CP - SupOther
31.49 63063000 6406 City Hall - SupOther
104.26 17017000 6406 Prk Mnt Ad - SupOther
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC Utilities-02/2024 02/25/2024 20240308 79.39
Invoice: Utilities-02/2024 Acct: 252162 Job:1
79.39 59059003 6406 Wat Distr - SupOther
CHECK 493307 TOTAL: 727.97
493308 03/08/2024 PRTD 132592 JF AHERN CO 632294 02/07/2024 20240308 265.00
Invoice: 632294
265.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
CHECK 493308 TOTAL: 265.00
493309 03/08/2024 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660686 02/15/2024 20240308 1,734.45
Invoice: 3660686 PO 38190
1,734.45 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660687 02/15/2024 20240308 33.85
Invoice: 3660687 PO 38194
33.85 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660688 02/15/2024 20240308 489.10
Invoice: 3660688 PO 38189
489.10 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 2484031 02/15/2024 20240308 1,450.78
Invoice: 2484031 PO 38168
18.20 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
1,432.58 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3660683 02/15/2024 20240308 1,222.45
Invoice: 3660683 PO 38191
1,222.45 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3662152 02/22/2024 20240308 24.60
Invoice: 3662152 PO 38448
24.60 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3662153 02/22/2024 20240308 675.55
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 29
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 3662153 PO 38449
675.55 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3662154 02/22/2024 20240308 1,979.40
Invoice: 3662154 PO 38475
1,979.40 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3662156 02/22/2024 20240308 1,347.55
Invoice: 3662156 PO 38454
1,347.55 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3662157 02/22/2024 20240308 585.90
Invoice: 3662157 PO 38453
585.90 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 36600682 02/15/2024 20240308 1,107.50
Invoice: 36600682 PO 38183
1,107.50 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493309 TOTAL: 10,651.13
493310 03/08/2024 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738878 02/15/2024 20240308 1,598.15
Invoice: 6738878 PO 38082
14.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,584.15 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738876 02/15/2024 20240308 104.50
Invoice: 6738876 PO 38080
4.20 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
100.30 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738877 02/15/2024 20240308 158.90
Invoice: 6738877 PO 38081
1.40 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
157.50 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738873 02/15/2024 20240308 594.30
Invoice: 6738873 PO 37999
5.60 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
588.70 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738875 02/15/2024 20240308 642.40
Invoice: 6738875 PO 38039
9.80 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
632.60 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6738874 02/15/2024 20240308 1,054.10
Invoice: 6738874 PO 38038
11.20 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
1,042.90 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 30
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742175 02/22/2024 20240308 1,616.72
Invoice: 6742175 PO 38468
22.40 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
1,594.32 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742169 02/22/2024 20240308 39.20
Invoice: 6742169 PO 38254
1.40 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
37.80 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742174 02/22/2024 20240308 1,225.95
Invoice: 6742174 PO 38300
22.40 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
1,203.55 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742171 02/22/2024 20240308 745.50
Invoice: 6742171 PO 38255
14.00 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
731.50 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742168 02/22/2024 20240308 2,193.20
Invoice: 6742168 PO 38465
81.20 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
2,112.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742165 02/22/2024 20240308 577.70
Invoice: 6742165 PO 38462
7.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
570.70 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742163 02/22/2024 20240308 .24
Invoice: 6742163 PO 38488
.24 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742172 02/22/2024 20240308 124.80
Invoice: 6742172 PO 38299
4.20 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
120.60 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742176 02/22/2024 20240308 3,507.70
Invoice: 6742176 PO 38470
37.80 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
3,469.90 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742177 02/22/2024 20240308 1,133.95
Invoice: 6742177 PO 38346
12.60 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
1,121.35 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742166 02/22/2024 20240308 355.70
Invoice: 6742166 PO 38463
355.70 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 31
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742167 02/22/2024 20240308 726.40
Invoice: 6742167 PO 38466
22.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
704.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6742173 02/22/2024 20240308 845.40
Invoice: 6742173 PO 38467
15.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
830.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493310 TOTAL: 17,244.81
493311 03/08/2024 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7462060 02/15/2024 20240308 2,519.20
Invoice: 7462060 PO 38174
25.20 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
2,494.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE MERCHANTS 7462058 02/15/2024 20240308 1,042.00
Invoice: 7462058 PO 38015
7.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,035.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE MERCHANTS 7462059 02/15/2024 20240308 1,269.40
Invoice: 7462059 PO 38175
8.40 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
1,261.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE MERCHANTS 7462832 02/22/2024 20240308 1,995.60
Invoice: 7462832 PO 38455
19.60 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,976.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE MERCHANTS 7462830 02/22/2024 20240308 3,737.42
Invoice: 7462830 PO 38459
30.80 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
3,706.62 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE MERCHANTS 7462834 02/22/2024 20240308 5.60
Invoice: 7462834 PO 38459
5.60 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
WINE MERCHANTS 7462831 02/22/2024 20240308 138.80
Invoice: 7462831 PO 38317
2.80 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
136.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
WINE MERCHANTS 753304 02/03/2024 20240308 -4.17
Invoice: 753304 RMA 12933
-4.17 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 32
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493311 TOTAL: 10,703.85
493312 03/08/2024 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484032 02/15/2024 20240308 329.64
Invoice: 2484032 PO 38173
4.20 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
325.44 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484034 02/15/2024 20240308 1,324.49
Invoice: 2484034 PO 38169
15.40 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,309.09 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484042 02/15/2024 20240308 664.40
Invoice: 2484042 PO 38067
8.40 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
656.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484050 02/15/2024 20240308 841.80
Invoice: 2484050 PO 38065
9.80 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
832.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484026 02/15/2024 20240308 273.57
Invoice: 2484026 PO 37955
.47 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
273.10 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484033 02/15/2024 20240308 1,723.82
Invoice: 2484033 PO 38071
9.80 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
1,714.02 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484041 02/15/2024 20240308 455.01
Invoice: 2484041 PO 38066
7.01 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
448.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484049 02/15/2024 20240308 222.95
Invoice: 2484049 PO 38064
4.20 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
218.75 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 274576 02/16/2024 20240308 -15.50
Invoice: 274576 RMA 13024
-15.50 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484045 02/15/2024 20240308 89.40
Invoice: 2484045 PO 38188
1.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
88.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 33
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484039 02/15/2024 20240308 172.20
Invoice: 2484039 PO 37991
4.20 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
168.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484028 02/15/2024 20240308 233.23
Invoice: 2484028 PO 381687
2.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
230.43 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484027 02/15/2024 20240308 177.40
Invoice: 2484027 PO 38166
1.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
176.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484030 02/15/2024 20240308 342.12
Invoice: 2484030 PO 38031
4.20 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
337.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484043 02/15/2024 20240308 509.60
Invoice: 2484043 PO 38029
5.60 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
504.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484025 02/15/2024 20240308 273.57
Invoice: 2484025 PO 37954
.47 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
273.10 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484029 02/15/2024 20240308 853.36
Invoice: 2484029 PO 38030
8.40 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
844.96 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484040 02/15/2024 20240308 774.62
Invoice: 2484040 PO 38028
12.62 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
762.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484048 02/16/2024 20240308 582.00
Invoice: 2484048 PO 38184
14.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
568.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2484046 02/16/2024 20240308 386.20
Invoice: 2484046 PO 38026
4.20 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
382.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488133 02/22/2024 20240308 243.32
Invoice: 2488133 PO 38442
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 34
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
1.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
241.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488140 02/22/2024 20240308 81.40
Invoice: 2488140 PO 38244
1.40 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
80.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 282074 02/22/2024 20240308 -129.40
Invoice: 282074 RMA 13097
-1.40 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
-128.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488147 02/22/2024 20240308 684.41
Invoice: 2488147 PO 38481
8.41 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
676.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488139 02/22/2024 20240308 704.31
Invoice: 2488139 PO 38480
9.81 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
694.50 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488129 02/22/2024 20240308 1,637.52
Invoice: 2488129 PO 38291
15.40 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
1,622.12 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488127 02/22/2024 20240308 471.14
Invoice: 2488127 PO 38246
4.20 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
466.94 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488136 02/20/2024 20240308 2,297.85
Invoice: 2488136 PO 38440
12.60 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
2,285.25 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488141 02/22/2024 20240308 136.20
Invoice: 2488141 PO 38289
4.20 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
132.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488130 02/22/2024 20240308 190.20
Invoice: 2488130 PO 38441
4.20 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
186.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488134 02/22/2024 20240308 162.68
Invoice: 2488134 PO 38443
1.40 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
161.28 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 35
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488148 02/22/2024 20240308 33.40
Invoice: 2488148 PO 38285
1.40 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
32.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488125 02/22/2024 20240308 31.40
Invoice: 2488125 PO 38290
1.40 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
30.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488137 02/22/2024 20240308 4,389.15
Invoice: 2488137 PO 38438
33.60 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
4,355.55 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488131 02/22/2024 20240308 1,063.19
Invoice: 2488131 PO 38338
11.20 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
1,051.99 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488143 02/22/2024 20240308 381.20
Invoice: 2488143 PO 38335
4.20 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
377.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488151 02/22/2024 20240308 335.00
Invoice: 2488151 PO 38333
7.00 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
328.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488126 02/22/2024 20240308 38.40
Invoice: 2488126 PO 38337
1.40 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
37.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488150 02/22/2024 20240308 33.40
Invoice: 2488150 PO 38332
1.40 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
32.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 287651 02/01/2024 20240308 -3.33
Invoice: 287651 RMA 12927
-3.33 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 287652 02/03/2024 20240308 -20.22
Invoice: 287652 RMA 12935
-20.22 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488144 02/22/2024 20240308 81.40
Invoice: 2488144 PO 38245
1.40 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 36
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
80.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 2488128 02/22/2024 20240308 222.29
Invoice: 2488128 PO 38247
2.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
219.49 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493312 TOTAL: 23,278.79
493313 03/08/2024 PRTD 130789 KATZ, DAVID 1299 02/08/2024 20240308 1,316.50
Invoice: 1299 About Town Historical Column and HH stories
700.00 10410400 6123 Comm Gen - Mgzn/News
616.50 10410403 6124 Website - InterneDvp
CHECK 493313 TOTAL: 1,316.50
493314 03/08/2024 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 160603028-0124 01/31/2024 20240308 1,996.25
Invoice: 160603028-0124 Engineering Services for Ped B
1,996.25
E ENG21026.CONSTRUCTN.CONSULTING.
26126106 6715 Grnd 2 TIF - CapInfrast
CHECK 493314 TOTAL: 1,996.25
493315 03/08/2024 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 6917 02/14/2024 20240308 116.00
Invoice: 6917 PO 38149
116.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493315 TOTAL: 116.00
493316 03/08/2024 PRTD 139451 LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL INC 2419 02/06/2024 20240308 79,876.00
Invoice: 2419 Braemar Park Invasive Vegetati
79,876.00
E P&R23208.CONSTRUCTN. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
CHECK 493316 TOTAL: 79,876.00
493317 03/08/2024 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 03-1055905 02/08/2024 20240308 686.17
Invoice: 03-1055905
686.17 61061009 6530 Pk Mant Eq - ReprParts
CHECK 493317 TOTAL: 686.17
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 37
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493318 03/08/2024 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 01-1055733 02/07/2024 22300057 20240308 31,240.00
Invoice: 01-1055733 2023 Kubota RTC-X1100 ATV
31,240.00
E P&R23208.MISCELLAN . .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
CHECK 493318 TOTAL: 31,240.00
493319 03/08/2024 PRTD 160902 HEUER, JASON LLOYD 2835 02/12/2024 20240308 75.00
Invoice: 2835 Photo for summer jobs campaign
75.00 10910900 6121 HR Gen - AdvPrsnel
CHECK 493319 TOTAL: 75.00
493320 03/08/2024 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 21952 01/02/2024 20240308 3,649.08
Invoice: 21952 WC TRAVIS IVERSON
3,649.08 60060001 6045 Work Comp - Work Comp
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 8825 02/27/2024 20240308 6,322.18
Invoice: 8825 GL Claim 338793
6,322.18 60060004 6200 Other Insr - Insurance
CHECK 493320 TOTAL: 9,971.26
493321 03/08/2024 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 68213 02/13/2024 20240308 1,064.20
Invoice: 68213 PO 38073
16.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,048.20 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
LIBATION PROJECT 68468 02/20/2024 20240308 488.00
Invoice: 68468 PO 38293
4.00 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
484.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
LIBATION PROJECT 68469 02/20/2024 20240308 1,095.88
Invoice: 68469 PO 38294
16.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
1,079.88 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
LIBATION PROJECT 68455 02/20/2024 20240308 266.00
Invoice: 68455 PO 38248
2.00 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
264.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
LIBATION PROJECT 68454 02/20/2024 20240308 961.88
Invoice: 68454 PO 38249
14.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
947.88 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 38
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
LIBATION PROJECT 68501 02/20/2024 20240308 406.08
Invoice: 68501 PO 38340
6.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
400.08 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493321 TOTAL: 4,282.04
493322 03/08/2024 PRTD 160486 LOCALITY MEDIA INC 4444 01/22/2024 20240308 25,620.00
Invoice: 4444 Occupancy Management & Pre-Incident Planning
25,620.00 12012000 6160 Fire Gen - Sftwr&Data
CHECK 493322 TOTAL: 25,620.00
493323 03/08/2024 PRTD 160655 MIP V ONION PARENT MP239286 11/16/2023 20240308 -41.71
Invoice: MP239286 CREEK VALLEYSOCCER FIELD
-41.71 17017005 6182 Litter Rem - Garb&Recyc
MIP V ONION PARENT MP244172 02/08/2024 20240308 73.00
Invoice: MP244172 LEWIS PARK
73.00 17017005 6182 Litter Rem - Garb&Recyc
CHECK 493323 TOTAL: 31.29
493324 03/08/2024 PRTD 160548 LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-2184 02/15/2024 20240308 78.00
Invoice: E-2184 PO 38146
78.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-2183 02/15/2024 20240308 140.00
Invoice: E-2183 PO 38145
140.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-2211 02/22/2024 20240308 185.00
Invoice: E-2211 PO 38417
185.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-2202 02/22/2024 20240308 398.00
Invoice: E-2202 PO 38227
398.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-2207 02/22/2024 20240308 205.00
Invoice: E-2207 PO 38401
205.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUCE LINE BREWING CO LLC E-2208 02/22/2024 20240308 140.00
Invoice: E-2208 PO 38402
140.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 39
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493324 TOTAL: 1,146.00
493325 03/08/2024 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 58729 02/14/2024 20240308 207.00
Invoice: 58729 PO 38151
207.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51703 02/21/2024 20240308 401.00
Invoice: 51703 PO 38384
401.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51704 02/21/2024 20240308 526.25
Invoice: 51704 PO 38397
526.25 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 002522 02/22/2024 20240308 -171.00
Invoice: 002522 RMA 13096
-171.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51706 02/21/2024 20240308 315.75
Invoice: 51706 PO 38406
315.75 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 51705 02/21/2024 20240308 258.00
Invoice: 51705 PO 38405
258.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493325 TOTAL: 1,537.00
493326 03/08/2024 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1175738 02/14/2024 20240308 281.52
Invoice: INV1175738 PO 38074
1.50 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
280.02 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1175765 02/14/2024 20240308 549.84
Invoice: INV1175765 PO 38132
6.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
543.84 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1180793 02/21/2024 20240308 309.48
Invoice: INV1180793 PO 38295
1.50 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
307.98 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1180764 02/21/2024 20240308 582.00
Invoice: INV1180764 PO 38424
6.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
576.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1180771 02/21/2024 20240308 309.48
Invoice: INV1180771 PO 38250
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 40
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
1.50 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
307.98 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1180786 02/21/2024 20240308 277.50
Invoice: INV1180786 PO 38341
1.50 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
276.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
MAVERICK WINE LLC INV1180762 02/21/2024 20240308 633.96
Invoice: INV1180762 PO 38433
3.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
630.96 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493326 TOTAL: 2,943.78
493327 03/08/2024 PRTD 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 02-12-2024 02/12/2024 20240308 2,403.00
Invoice: 02-12-2024 Senior Center-“Sinatra – My Way” AT SAINT CLOUD
2,403.00 16116103 6103 Senior Cen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493327 TOTAL: 2,403.00
493328 03/08/2024 PRTD 146040 STRAYER, JUSTIN IN-8520 02/22/2024 20240308 184.45
Invoice: IN-8520 PO 38162
184.45 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
STRAYER, JUSTIN IN-8622 02/22/2024 20240308 485.40
Invoice: IN-8622 PO 38125
485.40 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
STRAYER, JUSTIN IN-8532 02/22/2024 20240308 -4.23
Invoice: IN-8532 RMA 13050 / PO 38160
-4.23 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493328 TOTAL: 665.62
493329 03/08/2024 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 97897 02/06/2024 20240308 46.48
Invoice: 97897
46.48 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
MENARDS 97917 02/06/2024 20240308 66.28
Invoice: 97917
66.28 14014001 6406 Gen Mntce - SupOther
MENARDS 97896 02/06/2024 20240308 116.59
Invoice: 97896
116.59 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
MENARDS 98084 02/09/2024 20240308 37.93
Invoice: 98084
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 41
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
37.93 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
MENARDS 98080 02/09/2024 20240308 24.97
Invoice: 98080
24.97 55055001 6406 Bldg/Grnds - SupOther
MENARDS 98043 02/08/2024 20240308 69.31
Invoice: 98043
69.31 17017006 6406 Bldg Maint - SupOther
CHECK 493329 TOTAL: 361.56
493330 03/08/2024 PRTD 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS ASSOCI 2159 02/19/2024 20240308 306.00
Invoice: 2159 Edina HS / Women
306.00 16116100 6103 Athltc Act - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493330 TOTAL: 306.00
493331 03/08/2024 PRTD 100890 HILLTOP ENTERPRISES INC 2859 01/08/2024 20240308 5,577.50
Invoice: 2859 CLP Pond Mtce Summer2024
5,577.50 57057000 6230 General - SrvCntrcts
HILLTOP ENTERPRISES INC Golf Ponds-1/24 01/08/2024 20240308 6,014.00
Invoice: Golf Ponds-1/24 May 2024- Oct 1st 2024
6,014.00 52052000 6103 Golf Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493331 TOTAL: 11,591.50
493332 03/08/2024 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 13447 02/15/2024 20240308 170.00
Invoice: 13447 PO 38102
170.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
MILK AND HONEY LLC 13480 02/22/2024 20240308 410.00
Invoice: 13480 PO 38427
410.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493332 TOTAL: 580.00
493333 03/08/2024 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P13103 02/09/2024 20240308 961.50
Invoice: P13103
961.50 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493333 TOTAL: 961.50
493334 03/08/2024 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 35839 02/06/2024 20240308 130.50
Invoice: 35839
130.50 53053000 6575 Admin - Printing
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 42
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493334 TOTAL: 130.50
493335 03/08/2024 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-48269 02/13/2024 20240308 700.00
Invoice: E-48269 PO 38077
700.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48268 02/13/2024 20240308 188.00
Invoice: E-48268 PO 38075
188.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48461 02/20/2024 20240308 400.00
Invoice: E-48461 PO 38229
400.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48460 02/20/2024 20240308 468.00
Invoice: E-48460 PO 38228
468.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48453 02/21/2024 20240308 155.34
Invoice: E-48453 PO 38206 / RMA 13052
155.34 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48478 02/20/2024 20240308 900.00
Invoice: E-48478 PO 38431
900.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48455 02/20/2024 20240308 63.00
Invoice: E-48455 PO 38364
63.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
MODIST BREWING LLC E-48454 02/20/2024 20240308 241.00
Invoice: E-48454 PO 38363
241.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493335 TOTAL: 3,115.34
493336 03/08/2024 PRTD 100683 CHEMSEARCH 8566287 02/07/2024 20240308 851.49
Invoice: 8566287
851.49 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493336 TOTAL: 851.49
493337 03/08/2024 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 218477 02/14/2024 20240308 446.00
Invoice: 218477 PO 38127
10.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
436.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
NEW FRANCE WINE CO 189605 02/14/2024 20240308 -9.33
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 43
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 189605 RMA 13015
-9.33 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
NEW FRANCE WINE CO 218857 02/21/2024 20240308 928.00
Invoice: 218857 PO 38425
20.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
908.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
NEW FRANCE WINE CO 218856 02/21/2024 20240308 495.50
Invoice: 218856 PO 38252
7.50 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
488.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
NEW FRANCE WINE CO 218855 02/21/2024 20240308 2,829.00
Invoice: 218855 PO 38343
45.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
2,784.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493337 TOTAL: 4,689.17
493338 03/08/2024 PRTD 139023 NUSS TRUCK GROUP INC PSO072316-1 01/23/2024 20240308 39.98
Invoice: PSO072316-1
39.98 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
CHECK 493338 TOTAL: 39.98
493339 03/08/2024 PRTD 138155 OIL AIR PRODUCTS LLC 739578-002 02/07/2024 20240308 3,333.16
Invoice: 739578-002
3,333.16 61061004 6556 PW Equip - Tool&Acces
CHECK 493339 TOTAL: 3,333.16
493340 03/08/2024 PRTD 160033 OLD WORLD BEER LLC 9211 02/21/2024 20240308 116.00
Invoice: 9211 PO 38408
116.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
OLD WORLD BEER LLC 9210 02/21/2024 20240308 166.00
Invoice: 9210 PO 38407
166.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493340 TOTAL: 282.00
493341 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 ALEXANDER, LANCE 102742 03/01/2024 20240308 5.82
Invoice: 102742 UB 0305684006 425 MADISON
5.82 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 44
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493341 TOTAL: 5.82
493342 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 ANDERSON, AMY E 102773 03/01/2024 20240308 42.15
Invoice: 102773 UB 0332798003 7228 MONARDO
42.15 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493342 TOTAL: 42.15
493343 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 ATWATER, STEVEN 102747 03/01/2024 20240308 124.09
Invoice: 102747 UB 0157983009 5704 DEWEY HILL
124.09 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493343 TOTAL: 124.09
493344 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 BROWN, LLOYD C 102769 03/01/2024 20240308 32.71
Invoice: 102769 UB 0153493001 6912 ANTRIM
32.71 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493344 TOTAL: 32.71
493345 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 BUDDI, KIRAN 102759 03/01/2024 20240308 42.83
Invoice: 102759 UB 0162355009 5525 HIGHWOOD
42.83 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493345 TOTAL: 42.83
493346 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 BURSH, MURIEL A 102765 03/01/2024 20240308 14.23
Invoice: 102765 UB 0203619003 5509 HANSEN
14.23 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493346 TOTAL: 14.23
493347 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 CASHMAN, RICHARD 102735 03/01/2024 20240308 57.29
Invoice: 102735 UB 0111515003 6132 BEARD
57.29 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493347 TOTAL: 57.29
493348 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 CLARK, CHRIS 102756 03/01/2024 20240308 281.45
Invoice: 102756 UB 0120191005 5812 OAKLAWN
281.45 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493348 TOTAL: 281.45
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 45
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493349 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 COLEMAN, JAMES C 102757 03/01/2024 20240308 66.06
Invoice: 102757 UB 0120917008 4720 66TH
66.06 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493349 TOTAL: 66.06
493350 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 EATON, ROBERT 102761 03/01/2024 20240308 40.01
Invoice: 102761 UB 0305642007 419 MONROE
40.01 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493350 TOTAL: 40.01
493351 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 ELVERUM, H D 102770 03/01/2024 20240308 56.88
Invoice: 102770 UB 0161300203 6101 WATERFORD
56.88 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493351 TOTAL: 56.88
493352 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 ERICKSON, KIM 102734 03/01/2024 20240308 64.43
Invoice: 102734 UB 0110692000 5825 BEARD
64.43 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493352 TOTAL: 64.43
493353 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 FRANZNICK, TARYN 102750 03/01/2024 20240308 18.93
Invoice: 102750 UB 0305589002 422 VAN BUREN
18.93 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493353 TOTAL: 18.93
493354 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 GRESS, TYLER 102760 03/01/2024 20240308 202.70
Invoice: 102760 UB 0203243007 5137 WILLIAM
202.70 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493354 TOTAL: 202.70
493355 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 HIRSCHBERG, MICHAEL 102737 03/01/2024 20240308 44.64
Invoice: 102737 UB 0201295008 4320 58TH
44.64 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493355 TOTAL: 44.64
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 46
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493356 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 HP MINNESOTA I LLC 102763 03/01/2024 20240308 18.21
Invoice: 102763 UB 0330701003 4220 70TH
18.21 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493356 TOTAL: 18.21
493357 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 KALLAS, JULLENE 102744 03/01/2024 20240308 44.96
Invoice: 102744 UB 0110715003 5613 BEARD
44.96 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493357 TOTAL: 44.96
493358 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 KELLY, KAREN 102762 03/01/2024 20240308 20.97
Invoice: 102762 UB 0330231002 4232 VALLEY VIEW
20.97 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493358 TOTAL: 20.97
493359 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 KINGSLEY-HEFTY, JOHN 102748 03/01/2024 20240308 151.81
Invoice: 102748 UB 0200268003 4523 DREXEL
151.81 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493359 TOTAL: 151.81
493360 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 KOIVU, MIKKO 102754 03/01/2024 20240308 228.72
Invoice: 102754 UB 0111444009 5500 HALIFAX
228.72 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493360 TOTAL: 228.72
493361 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 LEUNG, BENJAMIN 102764 03/01/2024 20240308 1,337.61
Invoice: 102764 UB 0342700009 6076 OLINGER
1,337.61 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493361 TOTAL: 1,337.61
493362 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 Nickolatos, Jean 102648 02/29/2024 20240308 473.49
Invoice: 102648 UB 0307011006 5109 LINCOLN
473.49 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493362 TOTAL: 473.49
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 47
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493363 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 OLSON, MATTHEW 102749 03/01/2024 20240308 223.31
Invoice: 102749 UB 0203875002 5028 YVONNE
223.31 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493363 TOTAL: 223.31
493364 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 OUSKA, MATTHEW H 102753 03/01/2024 20240308 69.66
Invoice: 102753 UB 0342702007 6068 OLINGER
69.66 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493364 TOTAL: 69.66
493365 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 REALTY PROS, LLC 102766 03/01/2024 20240308 42.07
Invoice: 102766 UB 0121265004 6333 ST JOHNS
42.07 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493365 TOTAL: 42.07
493366 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 REC PROPERTY GROUP, LLC 102746 03/01/2024 20240308 40.61
Invoice: 102746 UB 0157923066 5523 VILLAGE
40.61 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493366 TOTAL: 40.61
493367 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 REFINED REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 102741 03/01/2024 20240308 35.22
Invoice: 102741 UB 0304806002 5305 MIRROR LAKES
35.22 59005920 1211 Stm BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493367 TOTAL: 35.22
493368 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 REISNER, JAMES 102758 03/01/2024 20240308 257.75
Invoice: 102758 UB 0159090149 5852 LONG BRAKE
257.75 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493368 TOTAL: 257.75
493369 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 RIENSCHE, RACHEL 102751 03/01/2024 20240308 115.17
Invoice: 102751 UB 0332727009 4904 ASPASIA
115.17 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493369 TOTAL: 115.17
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 48
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493370 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 RISHAVY, CANDACE 102745 03/01/2024 20240308 195.55
Invoice: 102745 UB 0153452000 5817 MCGUIRE
195.55 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493370 TOTAL: 195.55
493371 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 SEGALE, CHARLES 102658 02/29/2024 20240308 7,000.00
Invoice: 102658 UB 0193000079 6701 CHEYENNE TR
7,000.00 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493371 TOTAL: 7,000.00
493372 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 SHEIMO, MICHAEL 102740 03/01/2024 20240308 59.25
Invoice: 102740 UB 0304637007 5525 GLENGARRY
59.25 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493372 TOTAL: 59.25
493373 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 SHER, DAVID 102768 03/01/2024 20240308 58.29
Invoice: 102768 UB 0152753008 5708 68TH
58.29 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493373 TOTAL: 58.29
493374 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 SIMMONS, JASON W 102752 03/01/2024 20240308 159.69
Invoice: 102752 UB 0342600055 5404 VALLEY
159.69 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493374 TOTAL: 159.69
493375 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 TEYMOURI, SAMAD 102755 03/01/2024 20240308 85.01
Invoice: 102755 UB 0111851005 6300 CHOWEN
85.01 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493375 TOTAL: 85.01
493376 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 THE ESTATE OF MARJORY ELAINE EATO 102739 03/01/2024 20240308 15.15
Invoice: 102739 UB 0290182150 4324 FRANCE
15.15 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493376 TOTAL: 15.15
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 49
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493377 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 THRESHOLD HOLDINGS LLC 102743 03/01/2024 20240308 57.38
Invoice: 102743 UB 0304126005 5724 CODE
57.38 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493377 TOTAL: 57.38
493378 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 TICER, AVERY 102736 03/01/2024 20240308 92.13
Invoice: 102736 UB 0151145007 5701 LOIS
92.13 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493378 TOTAL: 92.13
493379 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 ULRICH, MARK 102771 03/01/2024 20240308 48.79
Invoice: 102771 UB 0305778003 413 ADAMS
48.79 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493379 TOTAL: 48.79
493380 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 WADDICK, MICHAEL 102772 03/01/2024 20240308 5.02
Invoice: 102772 UB 0306556009 5304 BLAKE
5.02 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493380 TOTAL: 5.02
493381 03/08/2024 PRTD 999997 WINTER, DANIEL 102738 03/01/2024 20240308 31.04
Invoice: 102738 UB 0203218008 5012 HANKERSON
31.04 59005900 1211 Wat BS - Accts Rec
CHECK 493381 TOTAL: 31.04
493382 03/08/2024 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 259618894 02/06/2024 20240308 142.36
Invoice: 259618894
142.36 63063001 6103 PW Fac - Prof Svrs
ORKIN 257515319 02/09/2024 20240308 149.47
Invoice: 257515319
149.47 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 257515002 02/09/2024 20240308 141.00
Invoice: 257515002
141.00 15515500 6102 Faclt Gen - Contr Svrs
ORKIN 261026502 01/30/2024 20240308 30.00
Invoice: 261026502
30.00 59059002 6103 Wat Wells - Prof Svrs
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 50
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
ORKIN 261026879 01/30/2024 20240308 30.00
Invoice: 261026879
30.00 59059002 6103 Wat Wells - Prof Svrs
ORKIN 261027504 01/31/2024 20240308 75.00
Invoice: 261027504
75.00 59059002 6103 Wat Wells - Prof Svrs
ORKIN 261027409 01/31/2024 20240308 30.00
Invoice: 261027409
30.00 59059002 6103 Wat Wells - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493382 TOTAL: 597.83
493383 03/08/2024 PRTD 100944 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228321 02/14/2024 20240308 1,786.50
Invoice: 228321 PO 38159
25.50 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,761.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228329 02/13/2024 20240308 1,346.50
Invoice: 228329 PO 38139 / PO 38200
22.50 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,324.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228943 02/21/2024 20240308 2,508.00
Invoice: 228943 PO 38415
48.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
2,460.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228948 02/21/2024 20240308 805.50
Invoice: 228948 PO 38253
10.50 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
795.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 228939 02/21/2024 20240308 585.50
Invoice: 228939 PO 38344
12.50 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
573.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493383 TOTAL: 7,032.00
493384 03/08/2024 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 27139608 02/23/2024 20240308 857.85
Invoice: 27139608 PO 37722
857.85 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 27139607 02/23/2024 20240308 1,059.10
Invoice: 27139607 PO 38403
1,059.10 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 33692656 02/19/2024 20240308 778.22
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 51
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 33692656
778.22 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 37606860 02/26/2024 20240308 1,432.44
Invoice: 37606860
1,432.44 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493384 TOTAL: 4,127.61
493385 03/08/2024 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-218082 02/15/2024 20240308 -15.00
Invoice: W-218082 RMA 13017
-15.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-219565 02/22/2024 20240308 333.00
Invoice: W-219565 PO 38394
333.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-219594 02/22/2024 20240308 623.66
Invoice: W-219594 PO 38385
623.66 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-219591 02/22/2024 20240308 167.50
Invoice: W-219591 PO 38386
167.50 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-218970 02/17/2024 20240308 -8.55
Invoice: W-218970 RMA 13040
-8.55 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-219635 02/22/2024 20240308 125.00
Invoice: W-219635 PO 38437
125.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-219581 02/22/2024 20240308 147.00
Invoice: W-219581 PO 38414
147.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493385 TOTAL: 1,372.61
493386 03/08/2024 PRTD 100119 PING INC 17341337 01/31/2024 20240308 -618.39
Invoice: 17341337
-618.39 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
PING INC 17356448 02/08/2024 20240308 50.00
Invoice: 17356448
50.00 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
PING INC 17372842 02/15/2024 20240308 1,831.80
Invoice: 17372842
62.58 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 52
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
1,769.22 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
PING INC 17372841 02/15/2024 20240308 2,879.30
Invoice: 17372841
2,673.30 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
206.00 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
PING INC 17374920 02/16/2024 20240308 1,555.00
Invoice: 17374920
1,533.30 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
21.70 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493386 TOTAL: 5,697.71
493387 03/08/2024 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 8421138 02/06/2024 20240308 69.44
Invoice: 8421138 Feb. pest control
69.44 51051000 6103 Admin/Ops - Prof Svrs
PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 8421258 02/06/2024 20240308 107.44
Invoice: 8421258
107.44 71071001 6103 Main Bldng - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493387 TOTAL: 176.88
493388 03/08/2024 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210697994 02/07/2024 20240308 1,721.70
Invoice: 210697994
1,721.70 61061004 6583 PW Equip - Tire&Tube
POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210698056 02/07/2024 20240308 269.31
Invoice: 210698056
269.31 61061004 6180 PW Equip - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493388 TOTAL: 1,991.01
493389 03/08/2024 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 161312 02/06/2024 20240308 1,203.56
Invoice: 161312
1,203.56 55055001 6511 Bldg/Grnds - SupCustod
SCHENCK, DAVID 161310 02/06/2024 20240308 1,001.82
Invoice: 161310 paper towels, tissue, liners, foamy cleaner
600.79 54054001 6406 Operations - SupOther
401.03 54054001 6511 Operations - SupCustod
CHECK 493389 TOTAL: 2,205.38
493390 03/08/2024 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-70114 02/21/2024 20240308 217.00
Invoice: W-70114 PO 38387
217.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 53
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493390 TOTAL: 217.00
493391 03/08/2024 PRTD 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH INC QLS27284 02/07/2024 20240308 291.25
Invoice: QLS27284
291.25 59059002 6180 Wat Wells - Rep&Maint
QUALITY LOCKSMITH INC QLS27305 02/09/2024 20240308 588.22
Invoice: QLS27305
588.22 17017000 6103 Prk Mnt Ad - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493391 TOTAL: 879.47
493392 03/08/2024 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0081367-IN 02/09/2024 20240308 581.95
Invoice: 0081367-IN
581.95 55055003 6406 Ice Maint - SupOther
CHECK 493392 TOTAL: 581.95
493393 03/08/2024 PRTD 100975 MULTI SERVICE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION 20240210033928 02/10/2024 20240308 1,661.64
Invoice: 20240210033928
782.78 14014001 6610 Gen Mntce - Saf Equip
356.98 12100000 6558 Build Insp - DeptUnifrm
521.88 55055003 6610 Ice Maint - Saf Equip
CHECK 493393 TOTAL: 1,661.64
493394 03/08/2024 PRTD 125936 REINDERS INC 3400076-00 02/09/2024 20240308 7,119.99
Invoice: 3400076-00 CLP -golf course chemicals
7,119.99 57057000 6540 General - SdFertWeed
CHECK 493394 TOTAL: 7,119.99
493395 03/08/2024 PRTD 114799 RES GREAT LAKES LLC IN43820 02/08/2024 20240308 1,635.39
Invoice: IN43820 Land Management Plan Update
1,635.39
E ENG22118.CONST.STRM. .
40840800 6103 Eng CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493395 TOTAL: 1,635.39
493396 03/08/2024 PRTD 134173 SAFE-FAST INC INV286150 01/31/2024 20240308 139.65
Invoice: INV286150
139.65 63063000 6203 City Hall - Uniforms
SAFE-FAST INC INV286688 02/09/2024 20240308 56.35
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 54
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: INV286688
56.35 14014001 6203 Gen Mntce - Uniforms
CHECK 493396 TOTAL: 196.00
493397 03/08/2024 PRTD 160893 SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 9003858606 02/08/2024 20240308 144.29
Invoice: 9003858606
144.29 55055000 6513 Admin - SupOffice
CHECK 493397 TOTAL: 144.29
493398 03/08/2024 PRTD 144403 SENTEXT SOLUTIONS 351648 03/04/2024 20240308 236.32
Invoice: 351648 Sentext Subscription Overages
236.32 10410403 6127 Website - OthrDigCom
CHECK 493398 TOTAL: 236.32
493399 03/08/2024 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2990012 02/15/2024 20240308 135.00
Invoice: 2990012 PO 38202
4.00 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
131.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
KELBRO COMPANY 2990081 02/15/2024 20240308 79.03
Invoice: 2990081 PO 38203
4.00 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
75.03 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
KELBRO COMPANY 2993907 02/22/2024 20240308 42.55
Invoice: 2993907 PO 38490
4.00 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
38.55 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
KELBRO COMPANY 2993904 02/22/2024 20240308 74.84
Invoice: 2993904 PO 38492
4.00 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
70.84 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
KELBRO COMPANY 2993837 02/22/2024 20240308 191.78
Invoice: 2993837 PO 38487
4.00 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
187.78 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493399 TOTAL: 523.20
493400 03/08/2024 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 461036 02/09/2024 20240308 64,430.74
Invoice: 461036 Design Services York Sanitary
64,430.74
E ENG23110.CONST.SANI.CONSULTING.
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 55
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
59005910 1605 Sew BS - PurchCIP
CHECK 493400 TOTAL: 64,430.74
493401 03/08/2024 PRTD 160278 ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 0018105 02/07/2024 20240308 282.72
Invoice: 0018105
282.72 62062000 6103 I.T. Gen - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493401 TOTAL: 282.72
493402 03/08/2024 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 18840 11/27/2023 20240308 131.33
Invoice: 18840 Food Scraps Only Posters
131.33 59359302 6406 Rec Org - SupOther
WALSH GRAPHICS INC 19034 02/12/2024 20240308 64.69
Invoice: 19034
21.57 58058001 6575 50th Sell - Printing
21.56 58158101 6575 Sthdl Sell - Printing
21.56 58258201 6575 Grnd Sell - Printing
WALSH GRAPHICS INC 19049 02/15/2024 20240308 185.00
Invoice: 19049 Ridge Construction Dasher
185.00 55055000 6103 Admin - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493402 TOTAL: 381.02
493403 03/08/2024 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN74231 02/13/2024 20240308 421.04
Invoice: MN74231 PO 38084
5.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
416.04 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SMALL LOT MN MN74423 02/20/2024 20240308 509.00
Invoice: MN74423 PO 38302
5.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
504.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SMALL LOT MN MN74422 02/20/2024 20240308 509.00
Invoice: MN74422 PO 38258
5.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
504.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SMALL LOT MN MN74430 02/20/2024 20240308 164.96
Invoice: MN74430 PO 38349
5.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
159.96 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493403 TOTAL: 1,604.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 56
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493404 03/08/2024 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444602 02/14/2024 20240308 1,411.79
Invoice: 2444602 PO 38161
5.60 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
1,406.19 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444601 02/14/2024 20240308 2,437.35
Invoice: 2444601 PO 38085
23.20 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
2,414.15 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444603 02/14/2024 20240308 41.29
Invoice: 2444603 PO 38088
.80 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
40.49 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444600 02/14/2024 20240308 1,094.20
Invoice: 2444600 PO 38089
12.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,082.20 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2444599 02/14/2024 20240308 194.32
Invoice: 2444599 PO 38086
2.40 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
191.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9566940 02/21/2024 20240308 -17.35
Invoice: 9566940 RMA 13087
-17.35 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447102 02/21/2024 20240308 644.40
Invoice: 2447102 PO 38309
4.40 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
640.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447103 02/21/2024 20240308 913.52
Invoice: 2447103 PO 38304
5.60 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
907.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447100 02/21/2024 20240308 3,019.52
Invoice: 2447100 PO 38375
29.60 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
2,989.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447104 02/21/2024 20240308 2,991.72
Invoice: 2447104 PO 38377
13.00 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
2,978.72 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447095 02/21/2024 20240308 96.80
Invoice: 2447095 PO 38263
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 57
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
96.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447096 02/21/2024 20240308 1,487.92
Invoice: 2447096 PO 38260
8.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,479.92 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447099 02/21/2024 20240308 41.29
Invoice: 2447099 PO 38262
.80 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
40.49 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447098 02/21/2024 20240308 1,787.57
Invoice: 2447098 PO 38376
7.20 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
1,780.37 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9566939 02/21/2024 20240308 -8.34
Invoice: 9566939 RMA 13088
-8.34 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447097 02/22/2024 20240308 270.71
Invoice: 2447097 PO 38420
.80 58058001 5512 50th Sell - CGS Liq
269.91 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447111 02/21/2024 20240308 4,062.30
Invoice: 2447111 PO 38379
16.80 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
4,045.50 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447108 02/21/2024 20240308 228.25
Invoice: 2447108 PO 38434
1.60 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
226.65 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447112 02/21/2024 20240308 517.36
Invoice: 2447112 PO 38351
5.60 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
511.76 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447109 02/21/2024 20240308 248.54
Invoice: 2447109 PO 38353
5.60 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
242.94 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2447107 02/21/2024 20240308 764.80
Invoice: 2447107 PO 38354
4.80 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
760.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 58
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493404 TOTAL: 22,227.96
493405 03/08/2024 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 80260 02/14/2024 20240308 12,570.63
Invoice: 80260 1/1/2024 - 1/31/2024
1,075.71 52052005 6185 Clubhouse - Elec&Solar
9,221.58 55055001 6185 Bldg/Grnds - Elec&Solar
374.45 57057000 6185 General - Elec&Solar
688.29 58058000 6185 50th AdGe - Elec&Solar
1,210.60 58158100 6185 Sthdl AdGe - Elec&Solar
CHECK 493405 TOTAL: 12,570.63
493406 03/08/2024 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 2 LLC 80261 02/14/2024 20240308 3,011.65
Invoice: 80261 1/1/2024 - 1/31/2024
3,011.65 55055001 6185 Bldg/Grnds - Elec&Solar
CHECK 493406 TOTAL: 3,011.65
493407 03/08/2024 PRTD 160346 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY Feb 2024 02/01/2024 20240308 6,895.20
Invoice: Feb 2024 02-2024 Standard Life Ins Invoice
6,895.20 9000 2026 Payroll BS - Life Ins
CHECK 493407 TOTAL: 6,895.20
493408 03/08/2024 PRTD 139006 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 00000781073 02/12/2024 20240308 4,250.00
Invoice: 00000781073 Contract 237701 Cust 0000000020
4,250.00
E P&R23208.CONSTRUCTN. .
40900000 6716 P&R CP - CapParks
CHECK 493408 TOTAL: 4,250.00
493409 03/08/2024 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1270011-Q1-2024 02/16/2024 20240308 34,977.00
Invoice: 1270011-Q1-2024 Community Water Supply Svcs Connection Fee
34,977.00 59059005 6136 Wat Treat - PrfSvOther
CHECK 493409 TOTAL: 34,977.00
493410 03/08/2024 PRTD 139006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 2024-Exam-Behlen 02/26/2024 20240308 32.00
Invoice: 2024-Exam-Behlen Nate Behlen Class B Water Exam
32.00 14014000 6104 PW Adm Gen - Conf&Schls
CHECK 493410 TOTAL: 32.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 59
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493411 03/08/2024 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 54038 02/16/2024 20240308 171.00
Invoice: 54038 PO 37980
171.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 54051 02/21/2024 20240308 147.00
Invoice: 54051 PO 38205
147.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 54077 02/21/2024 20240308 165.00
Invoice: 54077 PO 38230
165.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 54080 02/21/2024 20240308 550.00
Invoice: 54080 PO 38367
550.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493411 TOTAL: 1,033.00
493412 03/08/2024 PRTD 160987 STYLES, DARIN 24CAPF-Styles 02/22/2024 20240308 1,500.00
Invoice: 24CAPF-Styles Climate Action Fund
1,500.00 25000000 6103 CAS - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493412 TOTAL: 1,500.00
493413 03/08/2024 PRTD 135803 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Feb 2024 LTD 02/09/2024 20240308 5,754.58
Invoice: Feb 2024 LTD 02-2024 LTD Invoice
5,754.58 9000 2031 Payroll BS - LT/ST Disability
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Feb 2024 STD 02/09/2024 20240308 2,770.00
Invoice: Feb 2024 STD 02-2024 STD Invoice
2,770.00 9000 2031 Payroll BS - LT/ST Disability
CHECK 493413 TOTAL: 8,524.58
493414 03/08/2024 PRTD 137673 SWEETLAND ORCHARD LLC 4924 02/21/2024 20240308 240.00
Invoice: 4924 PO 38388
240.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493414 TOTAL: 240.00
493415 03/08/2024 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 547128164 02/22/2024 20240308 518.89
Invoice: 547128164 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
518.89 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 547145217 03/01/2024 20240308 -53.25
Invoice: 547145217 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
-53.25 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 60
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 14747464P 01/27/2024 20240308 -280.94
Invoice: 14747464P CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
-280.94 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447521124 03/03/2023 20240308 -26.35
Invoice: 447521124 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
-26.35 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 447924062 10/19/2023 20240308 -110.00
Invoice: 447924062 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
-110.00 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 547139154 02/29/2024 20240308 587.85
Invoice: 547139154 CONCESSIONS PRODUCT
587.85 54054002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493415 TOTAL: 636.20
493416 03/08/2024 PRTD 151143 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 4037 02/16/2024 20240308 315.00
Invoice: 4037 PO 38117
315.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 4036 02/16/2024 20240308 230.00
Invoice: 4036 PO 38133
230.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493416 TOTAL: 545.00
493417 03/08/2024 PRTD 137993 TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC 0017760 12/11/2023 20240308 248.95
Invoice: 0017760
248.95 21000000 6406 E911 - SupOther
TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC 0017828 01/24/2024 20240308 318.95
Invoice: 0017828
318.95 21000000 6406 E911 - SupOther
CHECK 493417 TOTAL: 567.90
493418 03/08/2024 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 37173102 02/14/2024 20240308 397.86
Invoice: 37173102
388.87 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
8.99 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37173375 02/14/2024 20240308 950.22
Invoice: 37173375
939.26 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
10.96 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 61
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
TAYLOR MADE 37173330 02/14/2024 20240308 971.18
Invoice: 37173330
962.20 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
8.98 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37172841 02/14/2024 20240308 449.29
Invoice: 37172841
440.30 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
8.99 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37173352 02/14/2024 20240308 1,847.03
Invoice: 37173352
1,818.65 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
28.38 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37177376 02/15/2024 20240308 159.13
Invoice: 37177376
150.70 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
8.43 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37177846 02/15/2024 20240308 940.74
Invoice: 37177846
921.66 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
19.08 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37189022 02/20/2024 20240308 232.54
Invoice: 37189022
223.55 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
8.99 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37195233 02/21/2024 20240308 -941.80
Invoice: 37195233
-941.80 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
TAYLOR MADE 37204966 02/23/2024 20240308 -72.20
Invoice: 37204966
-72.20 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
TAYLOR MADE 37214902 02/29/2024 20240308 354.81
Invoice: 37214902
324.81 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
30.00 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
TAYLOR MADE 37215085 02/29/2024 20240308 354.81
Invoice: 37215085
324.81 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
30.00 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
CHECK 493418 TOTAL: 5,643.61
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 62
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493419 03/08/2024 PRTD 122768 TEE TIMES PRESS 35854 02/08/2024 20240308 225.00
Invoice: 35854
225.00 52052000 6122 Golf Gen - AdvOther
CHECK 493419 TOTAL: 225.00
493420 03/08/2024 PRTD 160414 TEGRA GROUP INC 424.224 02/01/2024 20240308 8,550.00
Invoice: 424.224 Community Health & Safety Cent
8,550.00
E FIR21008.MISCELLAN . .
40500000 6103 Fire CP - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493420 TOTAL: 8,550.00
493421 03/08/2024 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 10552267 02/12/2024 20240308 49.28
Invoice: 10552267
49.28 14014001 6556 Gen Mntce - Tool&Acces
CHECK 493421 TOTAL: 49.28
493422 03/08/2024 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S9457 02/06/2024 20240308 486.00
Invoice: S9457
486.00 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S9454 02/06/2024 20240308 5,596.50
Invoice: S9454 Braemar Arena-exhaust fan switches for west & sout
5,596.50 55055001 6230 Bldg/Grnds - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493422 TOTAL: 6,082.50
493423 03/08/2024 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 38939 02/21/2024 20240308 978.00
Invoice: 38939 PO 38356
18.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
960.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 38964 02/22/2024 20240308 1,121.00
Invoice: 38964 PO 38267
21.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,100.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493423 TOTAL: 2,099.00
493424 03/08/2024 PRTD 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 149026 02/07/2024 20240308 6,327.00
Invoice: 149026
6,327.00 15415403 6180 Trfc Signl - Rep&Maint
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 63
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493424 TOTAL: 6,327.00
493425 03/08/2024 PRTD 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 91397044 08/30/2023 20240308 -280.00
Invoice: 91397044
-280.00 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
TRAVISMATHEW LLC 91612797 02/23/2024 20240308 3,166.20
Invoice: 91612797
35.00 52052006 5510 Ret Sales - CGS
3,131.20 52005200 1356 Course BS - Inventory
CHECK 493425 TOTAL: 2,886.20
493426 03/08/2024 PRTD 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 100301 02/06/2024 20240308 487.50
Invoice: 100301 2024 QTR1 DOT Random Tests
487.50 10910900 6175 HR Gen - EmpExams
CHECK 493426 TOTAL: 487.50
493427 03/08/2024 PRTD 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC 0754558-IN 02/08/2024 20240308 2,207.92
Invoice: 0754558-IN
2,207.92 55055001 6103 Bldg/Grnds - Prof Svrs
CHECK 493427 TOTAL: 2,207.92
493428 03/08/2024 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2247328 02/12/2024 20240308 316.21
Invoice: PSI2247328 door work
316.21 55055001 6180 Bldg/Grnds - Rep&Maint
TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2247319 02/12/2024 20240308 650.00
Invoice: PSI2247319 door work
650.00 55055001 6180 Bldg/Grnds - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493428 TOTAL: 966.21
493429 03/08/2024 PRTD 146436 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 130-143474 01/04/2024 20240308 666.67
Invoice: 130-143474 Tyler PS Data Collect Mar-May
666.67 13013000 6230 Pol Ad Gen - SrvCntrcts
CHECK 493429 TOTAL: 666.67
493430 03/08/2024 PRTD 160648 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410041461 02/12/2024 20240308 54.77
Invoice: 1410041461
54.77 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410041456 02/12/2024 20240308 9.10
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 64
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 1410041456
9.10 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410041454 02/12/2024 20240308 38.26
Invoice: 1410041454
38.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410041457 02/12/2024 20240308 47.04
Invoice: 1410041457
47.04 14014001 6201 Gen Mntce - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410041458 02/12/2024 20240308 28.14
Invoice: 1410041458
28.14 61061004 6201 PW Equip - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410000122 07/24/2023 20240308 53.37
Invoice: 1410000122
53.37 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410001667 07/31/2023 20240308 53.37
Invoice: 1410001667
53.37 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410003088 08/07/2023 20240308 53.37
Invoice: 1410003088
53.37 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410004568 08/14/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410004568
36.26 59059003 6201 Wat Distr - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410004569 08/14/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410004569 Short pay Sales Tax & Min. Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410004572 08/14/2023 20240308 53.37
Invoice: 1410004572
53.37 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410005775 08/21/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410005775
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410005776 08/21/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410005776 Short pay Sales Tax & Min. Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410005779 08/21/2023 20240308 64.70
Invoice: 1410005779
64.70 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410007019 08/28/2023 20240308 36.26
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 65
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 1410007019 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410007020 08/28/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410007020 Short pay Sales Tax & Min. Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410007023 08/28/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410007023 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410008741 09/04/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410008741 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410008742 09/04/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410008742 Short pay Sales Tax
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410008745 09/04/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410008745 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410010003 09/11/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410010003 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410010004 09/11/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410010004 Short pay Sales Tax & Min Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410010007 09/11/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410010007 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410011480 09/18/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410011480 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410011484 09/18/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410011484 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410012806 09/25/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410012806 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410012807 09/25/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410012807 Short pay Sales Tax & Min.Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410012810 09/25/2023 20240308 56.45
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 66
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
Invoice: 1410012810 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410014290 10/02/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410014290 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410014291 10/02/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410014291 Short pay Sales Tax & Min. Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410014294 10/02/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410014294 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410015690 10/09/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410015690 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410015691 10/09/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410015691 Short pay Sales Tax & Min.Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410015693 10/09/2023 20240308 31.50
Invoice: 1410015693 Short pay Sales Tax
31.50 61061004 6201 PW Equip - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410015694 10/09/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410015694 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410016991 10/16/2023 20240308 36.26
Invoice: 1410016991 Short pay Sales Tax
36.26 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410016992 10/16/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410016992 Short pay Sales Tax & Min.Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410018476 10/23/2023 20240308 12.00
Invoice: 1410018476 Short pay Sales Tax & Min.Charge
12.00 17017006 6201 Bldg Maint - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410018479 10/23/2023 20240308 56.45
Invoice: 1410018479 Short pay Sales Tax
56.45 63063001 6201 PW Fac - Laundry
UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1410019842 10/30/2023 20240308 31.80
Invoice: 1410019842 Short pay Sales Tax
31.80 59059001 6201 Wat GB - Laundry
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 67
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493430 TOTAL: 1,452.99
493431 03/08/2024 PRTD 145567 UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-3341 02/14/2024 20240308 162.00
Invoice: E-3341 PO 38112
162.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
UNMAPPED BREWING COMPANY LLC E-3340 02/14/2024 20240308 106.00
Invoice: E-3340 PO 38143
106.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493431 TOTAL: 268.00
493432 03/08/2024 PRTD 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY E-35498 02/21/2024 20240308 129.00
Invoice: E-35498 PO 38392
129.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493432 TOTAL: 129.00
493433 03/08/2024 PRTD 100050 USPS 691980 03/06/2024 20240308 6,245.97
Invoice: 691980 Postage for About Town Annual Report
6,245.97 10410400 6123 Comm Gen - Mgzn/News
CHECK 493433 TOTAL: 6,245.97
493434 03/08/2024 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 80259 02/14/2024 20240308 1,463.49
Invoice: 80259 1/1/2024 - 1/31/2024
1,463.49 55055001 6185 Bldg/Grnds - Elec&Solar
CHECK 493434 TOTAL: 1,463.49
493435 03/08/2024 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5794 02/16/2024 20240308 324.00
Invoice: 5794 PO 38204
324.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5817 02/21/2024 20240308 279.00
Invoice: 5817 PO 38372
279.00 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 5821 02/21/2024 20240308 270.00
Invoice: 5821 PO 38422
270.00 5800 1356 Liquor BS - Inventory THC Bev
CHECK 493435 TOTAL: 873.00
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 68
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493436 03/08/2024 PRTD 148579 VIERKANT DISPOSAL LLC 2/12/2024 02/12/2024 20240308 67,985.00
Invoice: 2/12/2024 1/1/24 - 1/31/24 Organics
67,985.00 59359302 6182 Rec Org - Garb&Recyc
CHECK 493436 TOTAL: 67,985.00
493437 03/08/2024 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007760062.001 02/06/2024 20240308 489.00
Invoice: S007760062.001
489.00 63063001 6180 PW Fac - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493437 TOTAL: 489.00
493438 03/08/2024 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S007770798.001 02/08/2024 20240308 304.94
Invoice: S007770798.001
304.94 57057001 6180 CLP Park - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493438 TOTAL: 304.94
493439 03/08/2024 PRTD 160088 VINIFERA IMPORTS 326481 02/15/2024 20240308 209.00
Invoice: 326481 PO 38092
209.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493439 TOTAL: 209.00
493440 03/08/2024 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0346133-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 1,316.50
Invoice: 0346133-IN PO 38095
12.50 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,304.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
VINOCOPIA INC 0346131-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 272.75
Invoice: 0346131-IN PO 38093
8.75 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
264.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
VINOCOPIA INC 0346132-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 312.50
Invoice: 0346132-IN PO 38094
1.25 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
311.25 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
VINOCOPIA INC 0346143-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 768.75
Invoice: 0346143-IN PO 38012
8.75 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
760.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
VINOCOPIA INC 0346137-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 317.00
Invoice: 0346137-IN PO 38049
5.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 69
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
312.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
VINOCOPIA INC 0346136-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 312.50
Invoice: 0346136-IN PO 38048
1.25 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
311.25 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
VINOCOPIA INC 0346520-IN 02/22/2024 20240308 525.00
Invoice: 0346520-IN PO 38269
5.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
520.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
VINOCOPIA INC 0346513-IN 02/22/2024 20240308 127.50
Invoice: 0346513-IN PO 38313
1.25 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
126.25 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
VINOCOPIA INC 0346512-IN 02/22/2024 20240308 645.00
Invoice: 0346512-IN PO 38450
5.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
640.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
VINOCOPIA INC 0346511-IN 02/22/2024 20240308 344.75
Invoice: 0346511-IN PO 38312
8.75 58158101 5515 Sthdl Sell - CGS Other
336.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
VINOCOPIA INC 0346516-IN 02/22/2024 20240308 655.50
Invoice: 0346516-IN PO 38358
7.50 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
648.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
VINOCOPIA INC 0346515-IN 02/22/2024 20240308 344.75
Invoice: 0346515-IN PO 38357
8.75 58258201 5515 Grnd Sell - CGS Other
336.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
VINOCOPIA INC 0346141-IN 02/15/2024 20240308 442.75
Invoice: 0346141-IN PO 38010
3.75 58058001 5515 50th Sell - CGS Other
439.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
CHECK 493440 TOTAL: 6,385.25
493441 03/08/2024 PRTD 120627 VISTAR 71058477 02/09/2024 20240308 1,388.97
Invoice: 71058477
1,388.97 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493441 TOTAL: 1,388.97
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 70
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493442 03/08/2024 PRTD 160533 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT OF LABOR AN 10188587 02/09/2024 20240308 102.13
Invoice: 10188587 4th Quarter: October 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023
102.13 60060001 6200 Work Comp - Insurance
CHECK 493442 TOTAL: 102.13
493443 03/08/2024 PRTD 130574 WATSON COMPANY 140158 02/08/2024 20240308 390.92
Invoice: 140158
390.92 55055002 5510 Concession - CGS
CHECK 493443 TOTAL: 390.92
493444 03/08/2024 PRTD 124216 WAUSAU TILE INC 691615 02/12/2024 20240308 1,037.36
Invoice: 691615
1,037.36
E ENG98001.MISCELLAN .SUPPLIES .
40840801 6406 Faclt CP - SupOther
CHECK 493444 TOTAL: 1,037.36
493445 03/08/2024 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 259635 02/14/2024 20240308 158.00
Invoice: 259635 PO 38090
2.00 58258201 5512 Grnd Sell - CGS Liq
156.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
WINE COMPANY 259636 02/14/2024 20240308 1,176.00
Invoice: 259636 PO 38129
12.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
1,164.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE COMPANY 260247 02/21/2024 20240308 368.00
Invoice: 260247 PO 38310
4.00 58158101 5512 Sthdl Sell - CGS Liq
364.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
WINE COMPANY 260244 02/21/2024 20240308 236.00
Invoice: 260244 PO 38265
236.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
WINE COMPANY 260249 02/21/2024 20240308 4,514.00
Invoice: 260249 PO 38311
72.00 58158101 5513 Sthdl Sell - CGS Wine
4,442.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINE COMPANY 260245 02/21/2024 20240308 1,964.00
Invoice: 260245 PO 38421
48.00 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
1,916.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 71
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
WINE COMPANY 260250 02/21/2024 20240308 3,210.20
Invoice: 260250 PO 38435
50.20 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
3,160.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493445 TOTAL: 11,626.20
493446 03/08/2024 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00143255 02/06/2024 20240308 864.00
Invoice: MN00143255 PO 37844
864.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINEBOW MN00143754 02/15/2024 20240308 546.00
Invoice: MN00143754 PO 38096
546.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
WINEBOW MN00143752 02/15/2024 20240308 459.00
Invoice: MN00143752 PO 38014
459.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINEBOW MN00143751 02/15/2024 20240308 650.25
Invoice: MN00143751 PO 38050
650.25 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINEBOW MN00143940 02/20/2024 20240308 171.00
Invoice: MN00143940 PO 38315
171.00 5800 1352 Liquor BS - Inv Liq
WINEBOW MN00143939 02/20/2024 20240308 1,008.00
Invoice: MN00143939 PO 38316
1,008.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINEBOW MN00143991 02/22/2024 20240308 180.00
Invoice: MN00143991 PO 38399
180.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINEBOW MN00143948 02/20/2024 20240308 90.00
Invoice: MN00143948 PO 38360
90.00 5800 1355 Liquor BS - Inv Misc
WINEBOW MN00143947 02/20/2024 20240308 1,005.00
Invoice: MN00143947 PO 38361
1,005.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WINEBOW MN00144117 02/22/2024 20240308 279.00
Invoice: MN00144117 PO 38270
279.00 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493446 TOTAL: 5,252.25
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 72
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
493447 03/08/2024 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 256686 01 02/08/2024 20240308 160.13
Invoice: 256686 01
160.13 57057001 6180 CLP Park - Rep&Maint
CHECK 493447 TOTAL: 160.13
493448 03/08/2024 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4894 02/14/2024 20240308 334.80
Invoice: 4894 PO 38103
334.80 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4917 02/22/2024 20240308 400.50
Invoice: 4917 PO 38215
400.50 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4921 02/22/2024 20240308 242.10
Invoice: 4921 PO 38231
242.10 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 4919 02/22/2024 20240308 283.80
Invoice: 4919 PO 38365
283.80 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493448 TOTAL: 1,261.20
493449 03/08/2024 PRTD 160299 WOODEN SHIP BREWING COMPANY 000628 02/16/2024 20240308 184.80
Invoice: 000628 PO 38198
184.80 5800 1354 Liquor BS - Inv Beer
CHECK 493449 TOTAL: 184.80
493450 03/08/2024 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-003776 02/20/2024 20240308 393.58
Invoice: INV-003776 PO 38199
5.50 58058001 5513 50th Sell - CGS Wine
388.08 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC INV-003777 02/20/2024 20240308 416.08
Invoice: INV-003777 INV-003777
4.00 58258201 5513 Grnd Sell - CGS Wine
412.08 5800 1353 Liquor BS - Inv Wine
CHECK 493450 TOTAL: 809.66
493451 03/08/2024 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 24638 02/09/2024 20240308 9,797.93
Invoice: 24638 tax exempt
9,797.93 61061005 6180 Police Eq - Rep&Maint
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 73
CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET
INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK 493451 TOTAL: 9,797.93
493452 03/08/2024 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC CM000180727 11/28/2023 20240308 -94.92
Invoice: CM000180727
-94.92 61061004 6530 PW Equip - ReprParts
ZIEGLER INC IN001359595 02/10/2024 20240308 780.62
Invoice: IN001359595
780.62 14014001 6530 Gen Mntce - ReprParts
CHECK 493452 TOTAL: 685.70
493453 03/08/2024 PRTD 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 3911291 02/09/2024 20240308 1,619.60
Invoice: 3911291 PEDI-PADZ MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRODE
1,619.60 12012000 6510 Fire Gen - SupFrstAid
CHECK 493453 TOTAL: 1,619.60
NUMBER OF CHECKS 239 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,672,128.86
COUNT AMOUNT
TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 239 1,672,128.86
*** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,672,128.86
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 74
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
CLERK: JMartinez
YEAR PER JNL
SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT
EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC
2024 3 237APP 4000-2010 Cap Prj BS - Accts Pay 228,054.51 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 9999-1012 Control BS - CashAP 1,672,128.86 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 1000-2010 GF Bal Sh - Accts Pay 152,138.18 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5500-2010 Arena BS - Accts Pay 39,718.75 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5600-2010 Field BS - Accts Pay 900.00 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 52005210-2010 Dome BS - Accts Pay 1,926.61 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 52005200-2010 Course BS - Accts Pay 23,602.19 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 4200-2010 EquRep BS - Accts Pay 60,509.96 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 26026000-2010 HRA Admin - Accts Pay 11,005.00 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5800-2010 Liquor BS - Accts Pay 209,344.42 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6300-2010 FacMgmt BS - Accts Pay 3,077.78 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6200-2010 I.T. BalSh - Accts Pay 31,577.77 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6100-2010 Equ Op BS - Accts Pay 33,448.07 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5100-2010 Art BalSh - Accts Pay 241.15 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5400-2010 EdinPrk BS - Accts Pay 7,525.67 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5700-2010 Cent Lk BS - Accts Pay 13,996.80 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 7100-2010 PSTF BS - Accts Pay 1,379.87 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005910-2010 Sew BS - Accts Pay 67,355.74 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 2500-2010 CAS BalSh - Accts Pay 64,161.58 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 9000-2010 Payroll BS - Accts Pay 536,321.35 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 26126104-2010 Pentgn TIF - Accts Pay 3,528.00 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005900-2010 Wat BS - Accts Pay 78,971.81 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 2300-2010 PACS BalSh - Accts Pay 223.24 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005920-2010 Stm BS - Accts Pay 196.22
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 75
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
YEAR PER JNL
SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT
EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6000-2010 Rsk Mg BS - Accts Pay 32,113.21 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 26126106-2010 Grnd 2 TIF - Accts Pay 1,996.25 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5300-2010 Aqu Ctr BS - Accts Pay 130.50 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005930-2010 Rec BS - Accts Pay 68,116.33 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 21002100-2010 E911 BS - Accts Pay 567.90 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
GENERAL LEDGER TOTAL 1,672,128.86 1,672,128.86
APP 9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 1,672,128.86
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 4000-1010 Cap Prj BS - Cash 228,054.51
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 1000-1010 GF Bal Sh - Cash 152,138.18
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 5500-1010 Arena BS - Cash 39,718.75
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 5600-1010 Field BS - Cash 900.00
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 52005210-1010 Dome BS - Cash 1,926.61
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 52005200-1010 Course BS - Cash 23,602.19
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 4200-1010 EquRep BS - Cash 60,509.96
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 26026000-1010 HRA Admin - Cash 11,005.00
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 5800-1010 Liquor BS - Cash 209,344.42
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 6300-1010 FacMgmt BS - Cash 3,077.78
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 6200-1010 I.T. BalSh - Cash 31,577.77
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 6100-1010 Equ Op BS - Cash 33,448.07
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 5100-1010 Art BalSh - Cash 241.15
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 5400-1010 EdinPrk BS - Cash 7,525.67
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 5700-1010 Cent Lk BS - Cash 13,996.80
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
APP 7100-1010 PSTF BS - Cash 1,379.87
03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 76
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
YEAR PER JNL
SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT
EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC
APP 59005910-1010 Sew BS - Cash 67,355.74 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 2500-1010 CAS BalSh - Cash 64,161.58 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 9000-1010 Payroll BS - Cash 536,321.35 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 26126104-1010 Pentgn TIF - Cash 3,528.00 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 59005900-1010 Wat BS - Cash 78,971.81 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 2300-1010 PACS BalSh - Cash 223.24 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 59005920-1010 Stm BS - Cash 196.22 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 6000-1010 Rsk Mg BS - Cash 32,113.21 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 26126106-1010 Grnd 2 TIF - Cash 1,996.25 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 5300-1010 Aqu Ctr BS - Cash 130.50 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 59005930-1010 Rec BS - Cash 68,116.33 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM APP 21002100-1010 E911 BS - Cash 567.90 03/08/2024 20240308 JBM
SYSTEM GENERATED ENTRIES TOTAL 1,672,128.86 1,672,128.86
JOURNAL 2024/03/237 TOTAL 3,344,257.72 3,344,257.72
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 77
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
1000 General 2024 3 237 03/08/2024 1000-1010 GF Bal Sh - Cash 152,138.18 1000-2010 GF Bal Sh - Accts Pay 152,138.18
TOTAL 152,138.18 152,138.18
FUND TOTAL 152,138.18 152,138.18
2100 2100 Police SR /Emergency 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
21002100-1010 E911 BS - Cash 567.90
21002100-2010 E911 BS - Accts Pay 567.90
FUND TOTAL 567.90 567.90
2300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
2300-1010 PACS BalSh - Cash 223.24
2300-2010 PACS BalSh - Accts Pay 223.24
FUND TOTAL 223.24 223.24
2500 Conservation & Sustainability 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
2500-1010 CAS BalSh - Cash 64,161.58
2500-2010 CAS BalSh - Accts Pay 64,161.58
TOTAL 64,161.58 64,161.58
FUND TOTAL 64,161.58 64,161.58
2600 26000 HRA /HRA Admini 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
26026000-1010 HRA Admin - Cash 11,005.00
26026000-2010 HRA Admin - Accts Pay 11,005.00
26000 TOTAL 11,005.00 11,005.00
2600 26104 HRA /Pentagon P 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
26126104-1010 Pentgn TIF - Cash 3,528.00
26126104-2010 Pentgn TIF - Accts Pay 3,528.00
26104 TOTAL 3,528.00 3,528.00
2600 26106 HRA /Grandview 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
26126106-1010 Grnd 2 TIF - Cash 1,996.25
26126106-2010 Grnd 2 TIF - Accts Pay 1,996.25
FUND TOTAL 16,529.25 16,529.25
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 78
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
4000 Capital Projects 2024 3 237 03/08/2024 4000-1010 Cap Prj BS - Cash 228,054.51 4000-2010 Cap Prj BS - Accts Pay 228,054.51
FUND TOTAL 228,054.51 228,054.51
4200 Equipment Replacement 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
4200-1010 EquRep BS - Cash 60,509.96
4200-2010 EquRep BS - Accts Pay 60,509.96
FUND TOTAL 60,509.96 60,509.96
5100 Art Center 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5100-1010 Art BalSh - Cash 241.15
5100-2010 Art BalSh - Accts Pay 241.15
TOTAL 241.15 241.15
FUND TOTAL 241.15 241.15
5200 5200 Golf /Braemar Go 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
52005200-1010 Course BS - Cash 23,602.19
52005200-2010 Course BS - Accts Pay 23,602.19
5200 TOTAL 23,602.19 23,602.19
5200 5210 Golf /Braemar Go 2024 3 237 03/08/2024 52005210-1010 Dome BS - Cash 1,926.61 52005210-2010 Dome BS - Accts Pay 1,926.61
FUND TOTAL 25,528.80 25,528.80
5300 Aquatic Center 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5300-1010 Aqu Ctr BS - Cash 130.50
5300-2010 Aqu Ctr BS - Accts Pay 130.50
FUND TOTAL 130.50 130.50
5400 Edinborough Park 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5400-1010 EdinPrk BS - Cash 7,525.67
5400-2010 EdinPrk BS - Accts Pay 7,525.67
FUND TOTAL 7,525.67 7,525.67
5500 Braemar Arena 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5500-1010 Arena BS - Cash 39,718.75
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 79
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
5500-2010 Arena BS - Accts Pay 39,718.75
FUND TOTAL 39,718.75 39,718.75
5600 Braemar Field 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5600-1010 Field BS - Cash 900.00
5600-2010 Field BS - Accts Pay 900.00
FUND TOTAL 900.00 900.00
5700 Centennial Lakes 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5700-1010 Cent Lk BS - Cash 13,996.80
5700-2010 Cent Lk BS - Accts Pay 13,996.80
FUND TOTAL 13,996.80 13,996.80
5800 Liquor 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
5800-1010 Liquor BS - Cash 209,344.42
5800-2010 Liquor BS - Accts Pay 209,344.42
TOTAL 209,344.42 209,344.42
FUND TOTAL 209,344.42 209,344.42
5900 5900 Utl Fund /Water 2024 3 237 03/08/2024 59005900-1010 Wat BS - Cash 78,971.81 59005900-2010 Wat BS - Accts Pay 78,971.81
5900 TOTAL 78,971.81 78,971.81
5900 5910 Utl Fund /Sanitary S 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
59005910-1010 Sew BS - Cash 67,355.74
59005910-2010 Sew BS - Accts Pay 67,355.74
5910 TOTAL 67,355.74 67,355.74
5900 5920 Utl Fund /Storm Sewe 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
59005920-1010 Stm BS - Cash 196.22
59005920-2010 Stm BS - Accts Pay 196.22
5920 TOTAL 196.22 196.22
5900 5930 Utl Fund /Recycling 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
59005930-1010 Rec BS - Cash 68,116.33
59005930-2010 Rec BS - Accts Pay 68,116.33
City of Edina, MN
A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
Report generated: 03/07/2024 14:12User: JMartinezProgram ID: apcshdsb
Page 80
JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED
FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
FUND TOTAL 214,640.10 214,640.10
6000 Risk Management 2024 3 237 03/08/2024 6000-1010 Rsk Mg BS - Cash 32,113.21 6000-2010 Rsk Mg BS - Accts Pay 32,113.21
FUND TOTAL 32,113.21 32,113.21
6100 Equipment Operations 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
6100-1010 Equ Op BS - Cash 33,448.07
6100-2010 Equ Op BS - Accts Pay 33,448.07
FUND TOTAL 33,448.07 33,448.07
6200 Information Technology 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
6200-1010 I.T. BalSh - Cash 31,577.77
6200-2010 I.T. BalSh - Accts Pay 31,577.77
FUND TOTAL 31,577.77 31,577.77
6300 Facilities Management 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
6300-1010 FacMgmt BS - Cash 3,077.78
6300-2010 FacMgmt BS - Accts Pay 3,077.78
FUND TOTAL 3,077.78 3,077.78
7100 PS Training Facility 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
7100-1010 PSTF BS - Cash 1,379.87
7100-2010 PSTF BS - Accts Pay 1,379.87
FUND TOTAL 1,379.87 1,379.87
9000 Payroll 2024 3 237 03/08/2024 9000-1010 Payroll BS - Cash 536,321.35 9000-2010 Payroll BS - Accts Pay 536,321.35
FUND TOTAL 536,321.35 536,321.35
9999 Pooled Cash Fund 2024 3 237 03/08/2024
9999-1012 Control BS - CashAP 1,672,128.86
9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 1,672,128.86
FUND TOTAL 1,672,128.86 1,672,128.86
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.C.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile
Creek Watershed for Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead
Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed for the Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake
Water-Quality Improvement Project.
INTRODUCTION:
The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) completed the Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water
Quality Study in August 2022 and the Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Improvement P roject
Feasibility Study / Preliminary Engineering study in 2023 to evaluate and recommend management activities to
improve lake water quality. The recommended management actions for both lakes include application of
aluminum and iron to the lake bottom sediments to reduce internal loading from the lake bottom sediments, and
removal of the existing aeration systems and installation of an upgraded aeration system.
NMCWD and the City hosted meetings with residents of the Arrowhead Lake Association and T he Indianhead
Lake Association in May 2021, April 2022, and October 2023.
NMCWD proposes to do the sediment treatments in spring 2024 and the aeration system installation in fall 2024.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Agreement Arrowhead and Indianhead WQ Improvement
Exhibit 2 Arrowhead
Exhibit 2 Indianhead
AL and IL Water Quality Study Summary 2022
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Between City of Edina and
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for the
Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
This cooperative agreement is made by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (Edina), and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, a watershed
district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D (NMCWD), to
improve water quality in Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake through design and
implementation of in-lake treatments, along with development and implementation of
watershed-management practices.
Recitals
Whereas Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has adopted a watershed
management plan in accordance with Minnesota Statutes section 103B.231, and
implementation of recommended improvements and activities from studies of Arrowhead
Lake and Indianhead Lake is identified in the plan as a NMCWD capital improvement
project, and NMCWD has levied funds via its watershed-wide authority under Minnesota
Statutes section 103B.241 for a project to improve water quality in Arrowhead Lake and
Indianhead Lake;
Whereas Edina and NMCWD share a strong interest in improving water quality in
both lakes, which are public waters of the state entirely within Nine Mile Creek watershed
and the City of Edina;
Whereas monitoring data indicate that neither lake is consistently meeting state
water-quality standards because of excess phosphorus and nitrogen, nutrients that fuel
growth of algae, causing eutrophication of lakes and decreasing water clarity;
Whereas in 2022, the NMCWD engineer completed a study of Arrowhead Lake and
Indianhead Lake that found that 54 percent of the phosphorus in Arrowhead Lake and 84
percent in Indianhead Lake originated from internal sources such as nutrient-laden
sediments, while stormwater runoff from the lakes’ watersheds and groundwater inflows
contributed further loading;
Whereas, on the recommendation from the NMCWD’s engineer’s 2023 feasibility
assessment of improvement measures and after a duly noticed public hearing, the NMCWD
Board of Managers ordered a project in accordance with Minnesota Statutes section
103B.251 at its November 15, 2023, regular meeting, consisting of combined sodium
aluminate and ferric chloride treatments of both lakes in conjunction with an upgrade to
lake-aeration systems already in place in both lakes, along with street sweeping beyond
that already being conducted as part of the city’s established program (these efforts,
together, constitute “the Project” as referred to herein);
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
2 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
Whereas the NMCWD engineer estimates the cost of implementation of the
internal load-reduction efforts at $488,000, while the costs of enhanced street sweeping are
to be determined based on further assessment of city capacity and other considerations;
Whereas NMCWD’s costs of implementing the Project will be paid from funds
levied by the board for the purposes;
WHEREAS Edina owns real property on Arrowhead Lake, designed by Hennepin
County with the property-identification number 06-116-21-24-0008, and on Indianhead
Lake, designed by Hennepin County with the property-identification number 06-116-21-42-
0020, suitable for use for the Project; and
Whereas Edina and NMCWD are authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 471.59
to enter into this cooperative agreement for the Project.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, Edina and NMCWD enter into this agreement to document
their understanding as to the scope of the Project, affirm their commitments as to
responsibility for tasks to be undertaken by each, dedicate the necessary rights to use
property owned by Edina, and facilitate communication and cooperation to successfully
complete the Project.
1 The Project
1.1 ELEMENTS. The Project is further defined and specified for purposes of this
cooperative agreement as consisting of the following elements:
A. Application of sodium aluminate and ferric chloride to Arrowhead Lake and
Indianhead Lake;
B. Upgrade of existing aeration systems at each of Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead
Lake;
C. Annual street sweeping in addition to Edina’s scheduled sweeping in the
watershed tributary to each of Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake.
(Items A through C are referred to herein individually as Project Element A, Project
Element B and Project Element C, and collectively constitute “the Project.”) The Project
will be undertaken under an adaptive management framework, wherein the parties will
consider the cost, effectiveness and results of measures taken as well as evolving site
conditions (including but not limited to rainfall and other weather conditions) and
optimal sequencing before commencing each element of the Project and possible
additional efforts, implementation of which would be conducted pursuant to an
amendment to this agreement.
1.2 DESIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. Under contract with NMCWD, the NMCWD engineer, Barr Engineering, has
prepared plans, drawings and technical specifications necessary for Project Element A,
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
3 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 1 and will serve as the
technical specifications in contract documents prepared by the NMCWD engineer for
purposes of contractor procurement.
B. The NMCWD engineer will prepare, under contract with NMCWD, plans,
drawings, and technical specifications for Project Element B for review and approval by
Edina in accordance with paragraph 4.4 herein.
C. The NMCWD engineer will prepare, under contract with NMCWD, a plan for
completion of Project Element C for review and approval by Edina in accordance with
paragraph 4.5 herein.
1.3 IMPLEMENTATION
A. NMCWD will obtain land-use rights necessary for the implementation of Project
Elements A and B, and maintenance of the aeration systems installed under Project
Element B, as detailed in paragraph 3.2 below.
A. Implementation of Project Elements A and B will be undertaken by a contractor
or contractors under contract to NMCWD and with oversight and management by the
NMCWD engineer. Implementation will include advance determination of the need for
and the procurement of all permits and other regulatory approvals necessary for each of
Project Elements A and B, and compliance with all permits and other regulatory
requirements. NMCWD will timely engage and consult with staff designated by Edina on
any material change in the designs and plans for Project Elements A and B after approval.
B. In collaboration with Edina, NMCWD will develop a plan for the post-installation
operation and maintenance of the aeration systems installed under Project Element B (the
Operations & Maintenance Plan) for Edina’s approval in accordance with paragraph 4.6
herein. On substantial completion of installation of the aerations systems under Project
Element B, ownership of all equipment and materials installed in and adjacent to
Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake will vest in Edina. Edina will operate, in consultation
with NMCWD, the aeration systems installed as Project Element B for 10 years after
substantial completion of installation. After the 10th year, Edina may continue, at its
discretion, to operate the aeration systems.
The Operations & Maintenance Plan will identify reporting to be completed and delineate
protocols for operating and monitoring the ongoing effectiveness of the aeration systems,
as well as routine maintenance and repair as defined in the Operations & Maintenance
Plan. Work to repair or maintain the effectiveness of the aeration systems falling outside
the scope of what is defined in the Operations & Maintenance Plan as routine maintenance
will be undertaken only with the concurrence of and under terms agreed to by both parties.
C. Edina will implement Project Element C for five years after review and approval
of the enhanced street-sweeping plan in accordance with paragraph 4.5 herein. After the
fifth year, Edina and NMCWD will assess the effectiveness of Project Element C in reducing
discharge of pollutants to the lakes, and Edina may elect to continue implementation of
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
4 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
Project Element C under such terms as the parties agree to in a written amendment to this
agreement.
D. NMCWD will complete or contract for assessment of performance of the Project,
including monitoring. NMCWD will share all monitoring results and assessment analyses
with Edina.
2 Cost-sharing and compliance credit
2.1 Edina will contribute the land-use rights needed for the Project as provided in
subsection paragraph 4.3 herein at no out-of-pocket cost to either party.
2.2 NMCWD will pay 100 percent of the costs for design, implementation, and
implementation oversight and management of Project Elements A and B; the development
of a draft plan for Project Element C; and development of the Operations & Maintenance
Plan as described herein; and performance assessment, monitoring and reporting.
2.3 Edina will perform or contract for the operation of the aeration systems installed
under Project Element B, including provision of electricity necessary for its operation, and
implementation of Project Element C at its sole expense.
2.4 Edina will perform or contract for the performance of routine maintenance, defined
herein and as further specified in the Operations & Maintenance Plan, for Project Element
C. The cost of maintenance or repair outside the scope of routine maintenance, as may be
agreed to by both parties, will be shared equally by the parties.
2.5 Each party will pay its own costs of education, outreach and publicity work
associated with the Project, except that the parties may separately agree to share costs of
contracted goods and services for education, outreach and publicity associated with the
Project.
2.6 Each party will pay the internal and incidental costs of its participation in the Project
not otherwise specified as subject to cost-sharing as specified in herein, including but not
limited to costs incurred in the event NMCWD cancels the Project in accordance with
paragraph 3.5.
2.7 Stormwater-management or nutrient-reduction capacity created by the Project, if
any, may be utilized by Edina in accounting for compliance with federal and state
regulatory obligations. Edina will determine, at its cost, available credit from the Project.
NMCWD makes no representation or warranty as to credit that will be available from or
results that will be achieved by the Project. No pollutant-reduction, resource-protection or
other performance capacity of the Project may be utilized by Edina for compliance with
NMCWD regulatory requirements.
3 NMCWD’s specific rights & duties
3.1 NMCWD has contracted with the NMCWD engineer to prepare a design, along with
plans and specifications and all other construction and implementation documentation
necessary for soliciting quotes or bids, for each of Project Elements A and B.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD makes no warranty to Edina regarding the
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
5 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
NMCWD engineer’s or another third party’s performance in design, construction,
implementation or construction/implementation management for the Project. On
NMCWD’s behalf, the NMCWD engineer will submit the design, plans and specifications
for Project Element B for Edina’s approval in accordance with paragraph 4.4, and will
submit a draft plan for implementation of Project Element C for review and approval in
accordance with paragraph 4.5. On NMCWD’s behalf, the NMCWD engineer will submit
the Operations & Maintenance Plan for Edina’s review and approval in accordance with
paragraph 4.6.
3.2 Beyond Edina’s dedication of land-use rights as provided in subsection 3.5 herein
and its conduct of Project Element C under its continuing role as a road authority, NMCWD
will obtain all land-use rights necessary for implementation and maintenance of the
Project. Edina will collaborate on and assist, as requested, NMCWD’s efforts to obtain land-
use rights necessary for the Project, including but not limited to expediting the issuance of
permits and other approvals necessary for the use of Edina right-of-way for access to
Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake
3.3 NMCWD will contract for the construction and implementation of Project Elements
A and B in accordance with applicable law. NMCWD will award and enter a contract or
contracts for the construction and implementation of Project Elements A and B that will,
in each case:
A. Name Edina as a third-party beneficiary.
B. Require the contractor to agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Edina,
its officers, council members, employees and agents from any and all actions,
costs, damages and liabilities of any nature arising from the contractor’s
negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific
contractual duty, or a subcontractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or
omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty owed by the contractor to
NMCWD. The contract will require that for any claim subject to indemnification
by an employee of selected contractor or a subcontractor, the indemnification
obligation is not limited by a limitation on the amount or type of damages,
compensation or benefits payable by or for the contractor or a subcontractor
under workers’ compensation acts, disability acts or other employee benefit acts.
B. Require that the contractor name Edina an additional insured with primary
coverage for general liability on a noncontributory basis for both ongoing work
and completed operations to the extent of NMCWD’s statutory liability limit.
C. Extend all product warranties and workmanship guaranties to Edina.
3.4 As between the parties and with the assistance and cooperation of Edina, NMCWD
will obtain all permits, licenses and other necessary approvals for itself and on behalf of
Edina from entities with regulatory authority, as determined by NMCWD. NMCWD will
ensure that Project Elements A and B are completed in accordance with applicable law and
regulatory standards and criteria.
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
6 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
3.5 NMCWD, or the NMCWD engineer on NMCWD’s behalf, will oversee the
implementation of Project Elements A and B, as well as preparation of the Operations &
Maintenance Plan and the plan for Project Element C. NMCWD may adjust the plans and
specifications during construction or implementation of Project Element A or B with notice
to Edina, as long as the revised plans or specifications do not require NMCWD to exceed
the scope of the rights granted under this agreement or create maintenance obligations not
anticipated hereunder. Until commencement of construction and/or implementation of
Project Element A or B, if NMCWD, in its judgment, should decide that the work is
infeasible, NMCWD, at its option, may cancel implementation of that project element or
the Project as a whole. If NMCWD so declares before commencement of construction and
implementation of Project Element B, all obligations herein, performed or not, will be
voided.
3.6 On completion of work that causes collateral disturbance of Edina property,
NMCWD or its contractor will restore Edina property accessed by the conduct of the
Project to a condition materially equivalent to pre-existing conditions, except to the extent
that such property is improved through construction of the Project. Within 90 days of
certification of all constructed components of Project Element B as substantially complete
for the intended purposes, NMCWD will provide as-built construction drawings of
constructed components to Edina.
4 Edina’s specific rights & duties
4.1 Edina will cooperate with NMCWD’s efforts to obtain permits and approvals needed
for the Project and act to facilitate proper and efficient processing of applications for
approvals for the Project, including but not limited to executing, as property owner,
documentation necessary to obtain regulatory approvals needed for implementation of the
Project.
4.2 By the signature of its authorized representatives hereunder, Edina approves the
designs, plans and specifications attached to and incorporated into this agreement as
Exhibit 1.
4.3 LAND-USE RIGHTS.
A. By the signature of its authorized representatives hereunder, Edina grants to
NMCWD, its contractors, agents and assigns a nonexclusive license to access and
use the portion of the city-owned properties designed by Hennepin County with
the property-identification numbers 06-116-21-42-0020 and 06-116-21-24-0008,
shown and labeled “Project Area” in Exhibit 2, and adjacent city streets for
purposes of implementation of Project Element A and Project Element B, and
otherwise as necessary to fulfill NMCWD’s obligations and exercise its rights
under this agreement, subject to such reasonable restrictions as Edina may from
time-to-time impose. NMCWD, on reasonable notice to and with the assistance
of Edina, may temporarily restrict or preclude public access to the Project Area
or portions thereof to ensure safety while construction or implementation
activities are under way.
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
7 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
B. Edina will forbear from any activity that unreasonably interferes with NMCWD’s
ability to exercise its rights or meet its obligations under this agreement,
including the transfer of ownership of any Edina-owned property within the
Project Area. Subject to its interest in preserving public safety, Edina will
facilitate NMCWD’s reasonable exercise of its rights under this agreement with
regard to access to and use of the Project Area, including but not limited to the
right to place signage within the Project Area to facilitate effective
implementation of the Project. Edina will not take any action within or adjacent
to the Project Area that could reasonably be expected to diminish the
effectiveness or function of the Project for the purposes intended.
C. On substantial completion of installation of the aeration systems pursuant to
Project Element B, Edina will own all constructed and installed components of
the Project. Edina may, at its discretion, enhance the appearance of the aeration
system at Indianhead Lake, so long as such improvements do not impair the
function of the aeration system.
4.4 Edina will have 10 business days after receipt to review and approve the 90 percent
complete design, plans and specifications for Project Element B provided in accordance
with paragraph 1.2B herein. The design, plans and specifications, when approved by Edina
pursuant to this paragraph 4.4, will be incorporated into and become a term of this
agreement. Failure to act within the specified time will constitute approval.
4.5 Edina will have 20 business days after receipt to review and approve the draft plan
for Project Element C provided in accordance with paragraph 1.2C herein. The plan, when
approved by Edina pursuant to this paragraph 4.5, will be incorporated into and become a
term of this agreement. Failure to act within the specified time will constitute approval.
4.6 Edina will work in collaboration with NMCWD to develop the draft Operations &
Maintenance Plan and will comment on and approve the final draft Operations &
Maintenance Plan within 45 days of receipt of the final draft, such approval not to be
unreasonably withheld. Failure by Edina to timely act on its rights and obligations under
this paragraph will constitute approval of the Operations & Maintenance Plan. On approval
of the Operations & Maintenance Plan, Edina will perform routine maintenance and
monitoring of the Project, in accordance with specifics of the Operations & Maintenance
Plan. Edina will notify NMCWD of any need for major repair or maintenance, removal or
replacement of the aeration systems installed in fulfillment of Project Element B, and the
parties in good faith will determine in accordance with the terms of this area whether to
undertake such work.
5 General Terms
5.1 INDEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP; LIABILITY. This agreement does not create a joint powers
board or organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, and neither
party agrees to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other. Only contractual
remedies are available for the failure of a party to fulfill the terms of this agreement. Edina
and NMCWD enter this agreement solely for the purposes of improving the ecological
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
8 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
health and condition of Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake in Edina. Accordingly, with
respect to any and all activity undertaken pursuant to this agreement, Edina and NMCWD
each agree to hold the other harmless, and defend and indemnify the other, its officers,
employees and agents for all claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses asserted
against the other party at any time by any third party, including any governmental body.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this agreement, Edina’s and
NMCWD’s obligations under this paragraph will survive the termination of the agreement.
This agreement creates no right in and waives no immunity, defense or liability limitation
with respect to any third party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD will not be
deemed to have acquired by entry into or performance under this agreement, any form of
interest or ownership in or to any portion of the land or water that is the site of the
implementation of the Project or adjacent property. NMCWD will not by entry into or
performance under this agreement be deemed to have exercised any form of control over
the use, operation or management of any portion of the Project Area or adjacent property
so as to render NMCWD a potentially responsible party for any contamination under state
and/or federal law, except that NMCWD will be liable to the degree such contamination is
caused or exacerbated by NMCWD.
5.2 PUBLICITY AND ENDORSEMENT. Any publicity regarding the Project must identify
Edina and NMCWD as the sponsoring entities. For purposes of this provision, publicity
includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs and
similar public notices prepared by or for Edina or NMCWD individually or jointly with
others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the Project. NMCWD and Edina will
collaborate on the development of educational, outreach and informational signage
pertinent to the Project, and each party, at its cost, may develop, produce and, after
approval of the other party, distribute educational, outreach and publicity materials related
to the Project.
5.3 DATA MANAGEMENT. All designs, written materials, technical data, research or any
other work-in-progress will be shared between the parties to this agreement on request,
except as prohibited by law. As soon as is practicable, the party preparing plans,
specifications, contractual documents, materials for public communication or education
will provide them to the other party for recordkeeping and other necessary purposes.
5.4 DATA PRACTICES. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated
for any purpose in the course of this agreement is governed by the Data Practices Act,
Minnesota Statutes chapter 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted
to implement relevant state law, as well as federal regulations on data privacy.
5.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement, as it may be amended in writing, contains the
complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof,
and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if
any, between the parties respecting such matters. The recitals stated at the outset are
incorporated into and a part of the agreement.
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
9 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
5.6 WAIVERS. The waiver by Edina or NMCWD of any breach or failure to comply with
any provision of this agreement by the other party will not be construed as nor will it
constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure
to comply with any other provision of this agreement.
5.7 NOTICES. Any notice, demand or communication under this agreement by either
party to the other will be deemed to be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched in
writing to:
Edina NMCWD
Jessica Wilson Administrator
7450 Metro Blvd 12800 Gerard Drive
Edina, MN 55439 Eden Prairie, MN 55346
jwilson@edinamn.gov esniegowski@ninemilecreek.org
952-826-0445 952-358-2276
5.9 TERM; TERMINATION. This agreement is effective on execution by both parties and
will terminate 10 years from the date of execution of the latest amendment hereto or on the
written agreement of both parties, except that obligations incurred by a party prior to
termination of the agreement will persist after termination.
{Signature page follows.}
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
10 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the agreement to be duly executed
intending to be bounded thereby.
City of Edina
__________________________________
_____________, Mayor
Date:
__________________________________
______________, City Manager
Date:
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
__________________________________
Larry Olson, President
Date:
Approved as to form & execution
_____________________________
NMCWD counsel
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
11 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
EXHIBIT 1
Plans, Designs and Specifications – Project Element A
DATE, 2024 Cooperative Agreement
12 Edina-NMCWD Arrowhead Lake & Indianhead Lake Water-Quality Improvement Project
Exhibit 2
Project Area
SallyLaPostLa
Brendan Ct
Indian Hills CirDako
t
a
T
r
I nd ian H illsR d
Timber R d g
Arrowhead PassIroquoisTrMohawk TrMccauley CirPaw neeRdTimberTrWMc
In
ty
re
C
t
ARROWHEAD LAKECITY ACCESS AREA
EXHIBIT 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.9.1, 2024-02-29 16:47 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271965_ARIN Feasibility\Maps\MISC\Figure 2-Arrowhead Lake Access Agreement.mxd User: MAO!;N
Project Area
Parcels 0 200100Feet
Arrowhead Lake
DakotaTrValley View RdD a k o ta T rCheyenneCir
IndianHills Rd
Cheyenne
Tr
Mark
Ter
raceDrBl
ackFootPassINDIANHEAD LAKECITY ACCESS AREA
EXHIBIT 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.9.1, 2024-02-26 10:45 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271965_ARIN Feasibility\Maps\MISC\Figure 2-Indianhead Lake Access Agreement.mxd User: MAO!;N
Project Area
Parcels 0 200100Feet
Indianhead Lake
REPORT
SUMMARY
Arrowhead and
Indianhead Lakes
Water Quality Study
August 2022
Prepared for
Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District
Protecting and Enhancing Water Quality
Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake are shallow lakes located in the southwestern portion of the city
of Edina, south of Highway 62 and east of Highway 169. The shallow, urban lakes suffer from moderate
to poor water quality. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD), a local unit of government
that works to address water-related problems, conducted a study of Arrowhead and Indianhead lakes in
2021 to evaluate current water quality and identify protection and improvement strategies. Additional
information on the current lake conditions, water quality challenges, and recommended management
strategies are summarized in this project overview, including proposed implementation timelines.
Protecting and enhancing the water quality of the lakes within the Nine Mile Creek watershed is one of
the primary goals of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The NMCWD’s lake management program
includes data collection (monitoring), assessment (e.g., studies), and implementation of projects and
programs to protect and improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Using monitoring data collected
by NMCWD in recent years (2019 and 2020), the objectives of this study were to assess or “diagnose”
the lakes’ water quality problems, understand the cause or sources of the problems, and recommend
management strategies to improve the water quality and overall health of the lakes.
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
1
Arrowhead Lake, October 2020
IMPROVING
LAKE WATER
QUALITY
REPORT SUMMARY CONTENTS
• Protecting and Enhancing Water
Quality
• Looking at Current Lake Conditions
• Managing to Protect and Improve
Our Lakes
For this study, the primary goals are to achieve the water quality
standards for shallow lakes, attain a diverse, native macrophyte
(aquatic plant) population, and support a healthy, balanced
fishery.
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
2
Lake Management Goals
When assessing the ecological health
of a lake, it is important to take
a holistic approach, considering
factors such as in-lake water quality
(e.g., phosphorus and nitrogen
concentrations), the health and quality
of the aquatic communities, and water
quantity (see Figure 1). How recreation
and wildlife habitat affect and are affected
by overall lake health are also considered.
Numerical goals exist for some of these
factors, such as state water quality standards.
However, other factors are assessed relative to
narrative criteria that describe the desired condition
and do not have strict numerical goals. For this study, the
primary goals are to achieve the water quality standards for
shallow lakes; attain a diverse, native macrophyte (aquatic plant)
population; and support a healthy, balanced aquatic ecosystem.
Indianhead Lake, June 2019
Looking at Current Lake Conditions
Healthy Shallow Lakes
Shallow lakes are unique ecosystems that differ from deeper lakes. Shallow lakes have depths that allow
for light to reach the lake bottom throughout most or all of the lake (often less than 10 feet deep). These
lakes also tend to be more nutrient-rich than other deeper lakes, especially in an urban setting where
they receive nutrients (e.g., phosphorus and nitrogen) from stormwater. A healthy shallow lake will have
abundant aquatic plant growth due to the shallowness and nutrients. However, excess nutrients can lead
to algal growth that creates turbid (murky-looking, low clarity) water and limits or prevents aquatic plant
growth. Aquatic plants are good for shallow lake ecosystems. Healthy shallow lakes have plants growing
throughout the entire lake, with a variety of species such as coontail, native pondweed, and water lily.
The plants can take phosphorus and nitrogen from the lake water, reducing the amount of nutrients
available for algae. Aquatic plants also provide excellent habitat for insects, zooplankton, fish, waterfowl
and other wildlife.
One measure of a lake’s health is the community of plants, fish and aquatic life it sustains. For aquatic
plants, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) has developed an index of biological
integrity (IBI), which is a score that compares the types and numbers of plants observed in a lake to
what is expected for a healthy lake. As shown on page 4, the number of plant species in Arrowhead and
Indianhead lakes in recent years are well below the DNR’s threshold of at least 11 species for a healthy
lake. In 2020, only 2–3 species were found in the lakes.
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
3
Arrowhead Lake, August 2019
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes are below the MNDNR threshold for healthy
number of plant species in the lakes, indicating a degraded plant community.
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
4
Indianhead Lake Macrophyte Species Richness Compared with
Plant IBI Threshold for Species Richness
Arrowhead Lake Macrophyte Species Richness Compared with
Plant IBI Threshold for Species Richness
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
5
Urban Watersheds
A lake watershed is all the land area that drains
to the lake through overland flow, channels, and
storm pipes. Land use practices within a lake’s
watershed impact the lake and its water quality
by altering the amount of stormwater runoff,
sediment, and nutrients (namely phosphorus and
nitrogen) that reaches the lake. Each type of land
use contributes a different amount of runoff and
pollutants to the lake, thereby impacting the lake’s
water quality differently. Land use within the highly
developed Arrowhead and Indianhead watersheds
is primarily single family residential, highway, open
water, and public open space, with smaller areas of
multi-family residential and churches. Arrowhead
and Indianhead lakes can be particularly sensitive
to land use impacts on stormwater quantity and
quality because both are land-locked with no
surface outlets.
Arrowhead
Lake
Indianhead
Lake
Map showing watersheds for Arrowhead Lake
(shaded purple) and Indianhead Lake
(shaded green).
Arrowhead Lake, June 2019
Sources of Nutrients
Nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) are a food source for algae. An overabundance of these nutrients
in a lake can result in nuisance algal blooms and threaten the health of the aquatic plant community.
In Minnesota, phosphorus is most commonly the “limiting nutrient,” although nitrogen can also be
limiting for portions of the growing season. Whether phosphorus or nitrogen is the “limiting nutrient”
this means the available quantity of this nutrient tends to control the amount of algae and aquatic plants
produced. The two primary sources are summarized below:
• Phosphorus and nitrogen in stormwater runoff from the direct watershed—
Stormwater runoff conveys phosphorus and nitrogen from streets, lawns, and
parking lots within the direct watersheds to Arrowhead and Indianhead lakes
via a series of drainage channels and storm drain pipes. This study confirmed
that stormwater runoff is a major contributor of phosphorus and nitrogen to
Arrowhead and Indianhead lakes.
• Nutrient-rich sediment—Phosphorus builds up over time in lake bottom
sediments as a result of sedimentation and die-off of vegetation and algae.
In general, two forms of sediment phosphorus can release back into the
water column when certain environmental conditions are met. When oxygen
levels are low at the lake bottom (typically periodically throughout the
summer), the form of phosphorus called “mobile-P” is released from the
sediment into the water column. “Organic-P” can also release from bottom
sediments, where the release rate is controlled by lake water temperature.
This study confirmed that phosphorus release from lake bottom sediments,
typically termed “internal loading,” is a major contributor of phosphorus to
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes.
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
6
Indianhead Lake 2020
Total Phosphorus Sources
Watershed/
Groundwater Inflow
16%
Lake Bottom
Sediment
84%
Arrowhead Lake 2020
Total Phosphorus Sources
Watershed
Inflow
46%
Lake Bottom
Sediment
54%
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
7
Arrowhead Lake Water Quality
Challenges
Review of historic data indicates that water
quality in Arrowhead Lake is poor, with summer
average total phosphorus and chlorophyll-a
concentrations generally above the state
standard for shallow lakes. The poor water
quality is primarily due to excess nutrients
in the lake, which fuels algal growth and
decreases water clarity. The phosphorus in
Arrowhead Lake comes from several sources,
including stormwater runoff from the watershed
and internal sources such as nutrient-rich
sediments. Additionally, the decrease in
the number of plant species as well as the
quantity of plants in the lake since 2014 is likely
contributing to the decrease in water quality.
Summer average total phosphorus concentrations measured in Arrowhead Lake between 2004 and 2020
Arrowhead Lake, September 2020
Too Much Salt
Observed chloride concentrations in Arrowhead Lake in April 2019
were moderately high (185 mg/L). The MPCA chloride standard is 230
mg/L. While chloride occurs naturally in lakes and streams, too much
chloride can be harmful to fish and other aquatic life. The primary
source of chlorides in our lakes and streams is road salt, which is
commonly used in the winter to minimize the amount of ice on our
roadways, parking lots, and sidewalks. With Arrowhead Lake receiving
stormwater runoff from several highways, local roadways, private
parking lots, and an area of developed residential properties, the lake
is especially vulnerable to chloride pollution. NMCWD works to provide training and other resources to
reduce the harmful impacts of chloride on our local waterbodies. For more information about chloride,
visit: www.pca.state.mn.us/water/chloride-salts
Indianhead Lake Water Quality Challenges
Review of historic data indicates that water quality in Indianhead Lake has been declining since 2004,
with summer average total phosphorus above the state standards for shallow lakes in 2019 and 2020
and chlorophyll-a concentrations generally above the state standard for shallow lakes since 2011. The
degradation in water quality is primarily due to excess nutrients in the lake, which fuels algal growth
and decreases water clarity. The phosphorus in Indianhead Lake comes from several sources, including
stormwater runoff from the watershed and internal sources such as nutrient-rich sediments. Additionally,
vegetation management reducing the number of plant species as well as the quantity of plants in the
lake is likely contributing to the decrease in water quality.
Summer average total phosphorus concentrations measured in Indianhead Lake between 2004 and 2020
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
8
Managing to Protect and Improve Our Lakes
Water quality in Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes has declined in the past decade. The lakes currently
do not meet water quality and ecological health goals and given this, future management efforts should
focus on improving lake water quality and ecosystem health, monitoring for changes, and continuing water
quality and ecosystem health protection measures as improvements are obtained. The recommended
management and protection strategies for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes are summarized on the next
page.
Planning-level opinions of probable cost were developed for several new management alternatives
evaluated as part of this study. These opinions of cost are intended to provide assistance in evaluating and
comparing alternatives and should not be considered as absolute values. All estimated costs are presented
in 2021 dollars and include costs for engineering and project administration.
• Arrowhead Lake Bottom Sediment Treatment: $125,000
• Indianhead Lake Bottom Sediment Treatment: $120,000
• Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Street Sweeping Program: $250,000
• Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Fertilization Optimization Program: $20,000
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
9
Indianhead Lake, August 2019
REPORT SUMMARY Prepared for the
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study Nine Mile Creek Watershed District / August 2022
10
Management/Protection Action Basis Estimated Timeline
Address
Internal Bottom
Sediment
Loading
Continuous dissolved
oxygen monitoring
Determine aeration capacity
of existing system 2022 - 2024
Alum and iron treatment
Reduce bottom sediment
phosphorus load
2023/2024
Modify aeration system,
as needed 2024
Sediment release
monitoring
Assess management
effectiveness 2024 - 2025+
Address External
Nutrient Loading
Enhanced street
sweeping program
Reduce pollutant loading
from stormwater
2022 - 2023 (Planning
begins)
Fertilizer management
program
Reduce nitrogen sources
from excess fertilizer use
2022 - 2023 (Planning
begins)
Chloride monitoring
Continue to identify/track
chloride levels from winter
salt use
As part of continued
lake monitoring
program
Promote NMCWD
cost-share grants to
watershed residents
In a fully developed
watershed, opportunities for
largescale BMPs are limited
2022+
Aquatic Invasive
Species
Curly-leaf pondweed
management
Continue to monitor and
treat curly-leaf pondweed
growth
2022+
Promote
Sustainable
Management
Discontinue copper
sulfate treatments
Evaluate timeline to
discontinue copper sulfate
treatments after internal
loading management
2025
Promote native aquatic
plant growth
Encourage native plants
to promote clear water
conditions and competition
with algae
2022
Discontinue blue dye
applications
Unnecessary addition of
chemicals 2022
REPORT SUMMARY:
Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes Water Quality Study
Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.D.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Noah Silver, Electrical/HVAC Supervisor
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: Professional Services for
Grandview and Vernon Street Lighting Replacement
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for Professional Services for Grandview and Vernon Street Lighting
Replacement with SEH for $87,400.
INTRODUCTION:
SEH P roposal #EDINA P-177573 for $37,500.00 - Design and construction documents for removal
and replacement of the street lighting system adjacent to the new Vernon Avenue bridge, Arcadia Avenue, and
Gus Young Lane, including a reroute of underground conduit for City fiber. Bid to contractors to go out
in summer of 2024. This project is needed to accommodate the bridge work starting in 2025.
SEH P roposal #EDINA P-177574 for $49,900.00 - 30% design for removal and replacement of the
street lighting system adjacent to Vernon Avenue, Pinewood Trail, Grandview Square P ark, and Sherwood
Avenue. This preliminary design work is to prepare for further phasing of the replacement of street lighting in
2025.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Grandview and Vernon Street Lighting Replacement
SEH Phase 1 Agreement
SEH Phase 2 Agreement
Request for Purchase
Requisition Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400074
Department: Engineering
Buyer: Noah Silver
Date: 03/04/2024
Requisition Description: Professional Services Grandview & Vernon Street Light Replacement
Vendor: SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPORATED
Cost: $87,400.00
REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT
DESCRIPTION: Professional Engineering Services for replacement of the Grandview and Vernon Ave. street lighting system.
SEH Proposal #EDINA P-177573 for $37,500.00 - Design and construction documents for removal and
replacement of the street lighting system adjacent to the new Vernon Ave. bridge, Arcadia Ave, and Gus
Young Lane, including a reroute of underground conduit for City fiber. Bid to contractors to go out in summer of 2024. This project is needed to accommodate the bridge work starting in 2025.
SEH Proposal #EDINA P-177574 for $49,900.00 - 30% design for removal and replacement of the street
lighting system adjacent to Vernon Ave, Pinewood Trail, Grandview Square Park, and Sherwood Ave. This
preliminary design work is to prepare for further phasing of the replacement of street lighting in 2025.
Both proposals are a part of a Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013
BUDGET IMPACT:
This project is funded from the operating budget - street lighting contracted services.
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10400 Yellow Circle Drive, Suite 500, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9229
952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com
SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action–Equal Opportunity Employer
SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT
February 29, 2024 RE: City of Edina
Edina 2024 Streetlight Improvements
Preliminary & Final Design Engineering
SEH No. EDINA P-177573
Mr. Noah Silver, CFM
Electrical HVAC Supervisor
City of Edina
Engineering and Public Works Facility
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
Dear Noah:
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) appreciates the opportunity to submit the attached proposal for
preliminary and final engineering services relative to the referenced project.
Project Understanding/Scope of Services
The project described to us consists of providing construction documents that detail lighting and electrical
design for the installation of a new lighting system along Vernon Avenue, Arcadia Avenue, and Gus
Young Lane, between the railroad tracks, Vernon Avenue, and the off Ramp from Highway 100. The
following items and/or tasks will be furnished and/or performed by SEH:
· Virtual project kickoff meeting
· Provide survey of existing topography including curb & gutter, sidewalk, boulevards, and above-
grade infrastructure as required
· Provide Gopher State One Call mapping
· Prepare photometric analysis of project area and provide to City for review
· Prepare MnDOT and Hennepin County Right-of-way permit
· Prepare CAD base files consisting of existing topography and above-grade infrastructure
· Prepare removal and proposed construction plans detailing the removal and installation of lighting
systems and fiber infrastructure
· Prepare special provisions that incorporate standard City furnished front end specifications and
contract documents
· Prepare 90% construction cost estimates for City review
· Provide 90% plan set and specifications for City review
· Provide 100% plans, specifications, and estimate
· Provide shop drawing review
· Provide final punchlist inspection and follow-up inspection
· Prepare asbuilt plans for new lighting systems
Mr. Noah Silver, CFM
February 29, 2024
Page 2
It is our understanding that the following items and/or tasks will be furnished and/or performed by the City:
· Provide streetlighting as-builts where available
· Submit MnDOT and Hennepin County Right-of-way permit and pay the security deposits
· Provide review and approval of photometric analysis
· Provide review and approval of construction documents
· Request quotes from contractors and award project
· Review and process pay requests and change orders (if needed)
· Provide construction observation
Schedule
Anticipated Project Schedule
Item No. Item Description Item Key Milestone Date
1 Receive Approval to Begin Project March 2024
2 Topographic Survey March / April 2024
3 Complete 90% Design April / May 2024
4 Complete Final Design May / June 2024
Fee
The estimated not-to-exceed cost to the City for this scope of work is $37,500 and includes reimbursable
expenses.
Survey and CAD Base File $8,500
Contract Documents and Permit Assistance $25,200
Post Construction Tasks & Punchlist Inspection $3,800
Total Estimated Fees $37,500
Compensation for these tasks is based upon the actual hours worked for personnel assigned to the
project. The total includes our reimbursable expenses. We will bill the City monthly for reimbursable
expenses and on an hourly basis for labor. We will provide these services in accordance with our
Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013.
SEH will furnish Additional Services due to changes in the scope of services, or as requested by the City.
We will provide an estimated fee for Additional Services as requested.
SEH can begin engineering services immediately upon receiving authorization to proceed. It is assumed
that all work will be completed no later than November 30th, 2024.
If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter, authorizing us to
proceed with the project and preparation of a Supplemental Engineering Agreement to be signed by
authorized representatives for both organizations.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide engineering services to the City. Feel free to contact me directly
at 612-805-6871, if you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal.
Respectively submitted,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Jon Kruse, Project Manager
Mr. Noah Silver, CFM
February 29, 2024
Page 3
c: Ken Taillon – SEH
William Bauer – SEH
Toby Muse – SEH
x:\ae\e\edina\common\2024 - 2025 streetlight improvements\20240229_sla ltr edina 2024 street lighting improvements.docx
Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2024
City of Edina, Minnesota
By: _________________________________
Name
_________________________________
Title
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10400 Yellow Circle Drive, Suite 500, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9229
952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com
SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action–Equal Opportunity Employer
SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT
February 29, 2024 RE: City of Edina
Edina 2025 Streetlight Improvements
Preliminary Design Engineering
SEH No. EDINA P-177574
Mr. Noah Silver, CFM
Electrical HVAC Supervisor
City of Edina
Engineering and Public Works Facility
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
Dear Noah:
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) appreciates the opportunity to submit the attached proposal for
preliminary engineering services relative to the referenced project.
Project Understanding/Scope of Services
The project described to us consists of providing a 30% lighting location plans and construction estimate
for a new lighting system along the following roads: Vernon Avenue from the railroad bridge to Pinewood
Trail, the roads leading to and around Grandview Square Park from Eden Avenue and Sherwood Road,
and Sherwood Road from Eden Avenue to Grandview Square. The following items and/or tasks will be
furnished and/or performed by SEH:
· Virtual project kickoff meeting
· Provide survey of existing topography including curb & gutter, sidewalk, boulevards, and above-
grade infrastructure as required
· Prepare photometric analysis of project area and provide to City for review
· Prepare CAD base files consisting of existing topography and above-grade infrastructure
· Prepare 30% lighting location plans detailing the locations of existing lighting equipment to be
removed and proposed locations of new lighting equipment
· Prepare preliminary 30% construction cost estimate
· Provide preliminary 30% lighting location plan set for City review
· Provide final 30% lighting location plan set and construction estimate
It is our understanding that the following items and/or tasks will be furnished and/or performed by the City:
· Provide streetlighting as-builts where available
· Provide review and approval of photometric analysis
· Provide review and approval of preliminary 30% lighting location plans
Mr. Noah Silver, CFM
February 29, 2024
Page 2
Schedule
Anticipated Project Schedule
Item No. Item Description Item Key Milestone Date
1 Receive Approval to Begin Project March 2024
2 Topographic Survey April / May 2024
3 Complete 30% Plan Set and Construction Estimate July 2024
Fee
The estimated not-to-exceed cost to the City for this scope of work is $49,900 and includes reimbursable
expenses.
Survey and CAD Base File $28,000
Lighting Location Plans and Construction Estimate $21,900
Total Estimated Fees $49,900
Compensation for these tasks is based upon the actual hours worked for personnel assigned to the
project. The total includes our reimbursable expenses. We will bill the City monthly for reimbursable
expenses and on an hourly basis for labor. We will provide these services in accordance with our
Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013.
SEH will furnish Additional Services due to changes in the scope of services, or as requested by the City.
We will provide an estimated fee for Additional Services as requested.
SEH can begin engineering services immediately upon receiving authorization to proceed. It is assumed
that all work will be completed no later than August 31st, 2024.
If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter, authorizing us to
proceed with the project and preparation of a Supplemental Engineering Agreement to be signed by
authorized representatives for both organizations.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide engineering services to the City. Feel free to contact me directly
at 612-805-6871, if you have any questions or comments regarding this proposal.
Respectively submitted,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Jon Kruse, Project Manager
c: Ken Taillon – SEH
William Bauer – SEH
Toby Muse – SEH
x:\ae\e\edina\common\2024 - 2025 streetlight improvements\20240229_sla ltr edina 2025 street lighting improvements.docx
Mr. Noah Silver, CFM
February 29, 2024
Page 3
Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2024
City of Edina, Minnesota
By: _________________________________
Name
_________________________________
Title
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.E.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: Professional Services for York
Avenue Pond Improvements
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for Professional Services for York Avenue Pond Improvements with BARR
Engineering for $60,100.
INTRODUCTION:
This project is the evaluation of improvements to the York Avenue South Pond (York Avenue P ond), located
southeast of the intersection of York Avenue South and West 64th Street (subwatershed NC_88).
The City seeks to evaluate lift station improvement opportunities for the two lift stations located at York Avenue
Pond (lift stations SLS-5 and SLS-11), as well as evaluate other pond improvement opportunities to mitigate
flooding and improve water quality. York Avenue Pond is a known flooding area and has been previously studied
(STS 406 Improvement Project; Barr, 2014).
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request for Purchase: Professional Services for York Avenue Pond Improvements
BARR Agreement
Request for Purchase
Contract Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400083
Department: Engineering
Buyer: Chad Millner
Date: 03/11/2024
Requisition Description: Professional Services York Ave Pond Improvements
Vendor: BARR Engineering
Cost: $60,100.00
REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE: SERVICE CONTRACT
DESCRIPTION:
This project is the evaluation of improvements to the York Avenue South Pond (York Avenue Pond),
located southeast of the intersection of York Avenue South and West 64th Street (subwatershed NC_88).
The City of Edina (City) seeks to evaluate lift station improvement opportunities for the two lift stations
located at York Avenue Pond (lift stations SLS-5 and SLS-11), as well as evaluate other pond
improvement opportunities to mitigate flooding and improve water quality. York Avenue Pond is a
known flooding area and has been previously studied (STS 406 Improvement Project; Barr, 2014). It is
also our understanding that lift station SLS-5 is currently not operational.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This project is funded by the storm water utility.
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:
This project may lead to storm water improvements related to flooding and clean water.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
This project may lead to storm water improvements related to flooding and clean water.
Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 | 952.832.2600 |www.barr.com
February 15, 2024
Ross Bintner, PE
City of Edina
Engineering Department
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
Re: Proposal for Evaluation of York Avenue Pond Improvements
Dear Ross:
This letter presents our proposed scope of work and estimated budget for evaluation of improvements to
the York Avenue South Pond (York Avenue Pond), located southeast of the intersection of York Avenue
South and West 64th Street (subwatershed NC_88). The scope of work presented below is based on
general work tasks discussed with City staff on January 12, 2024. The following sections outline our
understanding of the work, the proposed work plan, project deliverables, schedule, and estimated budget.
Understanding of Work
It is our understanding that the City of Edina (City) seeks to evaluate lift station improvement
opportunities for the two lift stations located at York Avenue Pond (lift stations SLS-5 and SLS-11, Figure
A), as well as evaluate other pond improvement opportunities to mitigate flooding and improve water
quality. York Avenue Pond is a known flooding area and has been previously studied (STS 406
Improvement Project; Barr, 2014). It is also our understanding that lift station SLS-5 is currently not
operational.
For this feasibility study, Barr will evaluate lift station improvement options and pond improvement and
expansion opportunities with the goal of mitigating flood risk and flood frequency for the residential
structures within the York Avenue Pond flood area. It is Barr’s understanding that the City wishes to
replace the two lift stations with one lift station capable of pumping to existing storm sewer along Barrie
Road (west) and Xerxes Avenue South (east). Barr will evaluate pumping rate strategies to mitigate York
Avenue Pond flooding while minimizing impacts to downstream flood areas. Additionally, Barr will
evaluate implementation of Adaptive Level Control Systems (ALCS), which allow outlet operation (e.g., lift
station operation) to adapt to forecasted precipitation condition and/or other factors such as pond level
and/or upstream or downstream water level conditions.
Barr will coordinate with the City throughout the alternatives analysis and will develop a report that
summarizes findings and provides planning-level cost estimates for select alternatives. It is our
understanding that analysis results and planning-level costs will be used to inform the City’s 2025 budget
planning. Key project tasks and deliverables are outlined in the proposed work plan, below.
Ross Bintner, PE February 15, 2024
Page 2
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2024\SW\City Requests\05 York Ave Pond Improvements\Proposal\York Ave S Pond Improvements_v04.docx
Figure A York Avenue Pond Study Area
Proposed Work Plan
Based on our understanding of the project, the proposed work plan includes the following major tasks:
Task 1: Data Acquisition and Review
Barr will organize a kickoff meeting with City staff to discuss data gaps, strategies to resolve key data
gaps, and flood mitigation, water quality, project goals, and potential permitting considerations. At the
January 12, 2024, working meeting, City staff reviewed private storm sewer information obtained along
Barrie Road related to 2024 road reconstruction efforts. Private storm sewer from properties including
Colony at Edina, The Edina Towers, and Yorker Condominiums have the potential to impact drainage
divides and routing to York Avenue Pond. For this reason, Barr will coordinate with the City to obtain
information on private and public sewer, and will update the existing stormwater model accordingly. Barr
will also incorporate information related to the existing operation of lift stations SLS-5 and SLS-11. Barr
will model and evaluate the flood impact for up to four (4) Atlas 14 design events (e.g., the 5-, 10-, 25-,
Ross Bintner, PE February 15, 2024
Page 3
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2024\SW\City Requests\05 York Ave Pond Improvements\Proposal\York Ave S Pond Improvements_v04.docx
and 100-year events). We will also evaluate flood impacts for the 500-year Atlas 14 event, which will be
used to evaluate the resiliency of flood mitigation alternatives to the effects of increased precipitation due
to climate change. Barr will generate a figure showing existing inundation and potential flooding impacts.
Assumptions:
• The stormwater model will be updated one (1) time based on data acquired.
• Barr assumes survey and private sewer field investigations will be conducted by the City, if
needed.
• Barr assumes the City will provide lift station operation data, if available.
• Barr assumes no survey of low-entry elevations will be performed, and potential structure impacts
will be evaluated through elevation analysis in GIS.
• Existing conditions modeling will assume that that SLS-5 is currently non-operational.
• Barr will provide a summary of permitting considerations in the technical memorandum but will
not initiate permitting as part of this feasibility study.
Deliverables:
• Kickoff meeting agenda and notes.
• Updated existing condition stormwater model.
• Existing condition figure showing flood inundation extents and potentially impacted structures.
• Description and figures summarizing model updates to be included in final technical
memorandum (Task 5).
Task 2: Evaluate Lift Station Improvements and ALCS Application
Barr will evaluate alternatives to replace the existing lift stations on York Avenue Pond (SLS-5 and SLS-11)
with one lift station capable of pumping to existing storm sewer along Barrie Road (west) and Xerxes
Avenue South (east) (i.e., the existing forcemain outfalls shown on Figure A). Barr will evaluate potential
pumping strategies, including implementation of ALCS (e.g., pre-event drawdown), to achieve flood
mitigation and water quality improvement goals discussed at the kickoff meeting (Task 1). Alternatives will
consider impacts of climate change. For example, ALCS implementation may provide resilience through
adaptive system management and by adaptively responding to forecasted rainfall. Barr will evaluate
downstream impacts associated with pumping strategies. We assume that flood mitigation alternatives
may incorporate pond improvements discussed further in Task 3. Alternatives developed will be reviewed
with City staff prior to development of planning-level cost estimates (Task 4).
Assumptions:
• Barr assumes no changes to forcemain configuration and no changes to downstream gravity
storm sewer systems will be evaluated. If it is determined that alternate forcemain routing and/or
downstream gravity main alternatives may be needed to meet flood mitigation goals, Barr will
coordinate with the City before proceeding.
• Barr will evaluate up to three (3) flood mitigation alternatives to review with City staff.
• Barr does not anticipate producing CAD details or grading contours as part of this deliverable.
Ross Bintner, PE February 15, 2024
Page 4
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2024\SW\City Requests\05 York Ave Pond Improvements\Proposal\York Ave S Pond Improvements_v04.docx
Deliverables:
• Up to two (2) alternative review meetings.
• Feasibility-level figures and graphics summarizing proposed pumping strategies and flood
mitigation results.
Task 3: Evaluate York Avenue Pond Improvements
Barr will evaluate opportunities to improve and/or expand York Avenue Pond. Prior to evaluating pond
expansion opportunities, Barr will perform a bathymetric survey and soft sediment survey to estimate
accumulated sediment volume in York Avenue Pond. The survey will be conducted using a total station
and/or survey grade GPS. Barr will collect 4-5 sediment cores for analysis during a one-day site visit to
estimate the location of the natural pond bottom. Barr does not plan to collect additional sediment
samples for chemical testing, but the scope could be adjusted to include this testing if requested by the
City.
In addition to evaluating the need for sediment management, Barr will investigate opportunities to
expand the footprint and/or bathymetric volume of York Avenue Pond. Pond expansion and/or sediment
management may improve the effectiveness of ALCS strategies by increasing the bathymetric storage
volume available for pre-event drawdown.
Assumptions:
• The City will provide any available pond bathymetric information.
• The bathymetric survey will be performed in Spring following ice-out.
• City staff will provide advance notification of this work to property owners in the immediate
vicinity of the pond of this work due to the proximity to private properties.
• Barr assumes the pond is regulated as a wetland but will still evaluate deepening and expansion
alternatives as these may be permittable through coordination with the LGU.
• Barr assumes wetland delineation will not be completed as part of this feasibility study but would
need to be complete prior to permitting a project.
• Barr assumes that bathymetric and sediment survey will occur following ice-out in late April or
Early May.
Deliverables:
• Pond survey bathymetric contours and estimated accumulated sedimentation depth and volumes.
• Incorporation of sediment removal and/or pond expansion into Task 2.
Task 4: Planning-Level Cost Estimates for Selected Alternatives
Barr will meet with City staff to review alternatives developed during Task 2 and Task 3. Barr will then
develop planning-level cost estimates for select alternatives. Construction cost estimates will include
subtotals for storm sewer, forcemain, and lift station improvements, as well as pond sediment
management and/or pond expansion. Barr assumes that Class 4 estimates as defined by ASTM E2516-06
Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System will be prepared for alternatives selected by
City staff.
Ross Bintner, PE February 15, 2024
Page 5
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2024\SW\City Requests\05 York Ave Pond Improvements\Proposal\York Ave S Pond Improvements_v04.docx
Assumptions:
• Planning-level cost estimates will be generated for up to two (2) alternatives.
• We will include cost assumptions related to project permitting based on the alternatives selected.
Deliverables:
• Planning-level, Class 4 estimates will be prepared for alternatives selected by the City.
Task 5: Technical Memorandum
Barr will summarize Tasks 1 through 4 in a technical memorandum for City review and comment before
finalizing. The memorandum will include a summary of all evaluated improvement opportunities, figures,
exhibits, conceptual layouts, planning-level cost estimates, and a description of permitting challenges /
considerations associated with the selected alternatives.
Assumptions:
• Barr will incorporate one (1) round of City comments prior to finalizing the technical
memorandum.
Deliverables:
• Technical memorandum summarizing the York Avenue Pond improvement feasibility study.
• Final versions of all figures, exhibits, conceptual layouts, and planning-level cost estimates
developed in Tasks 1 through 4.
Budget and Schedule
The total cost for the estimated scope of work described above is $60,100. The table below summarizes
the cost for each major task. Our cost estimate assumes the project will be completed based on the
assumptions described above. We will not exceed the total budget listed below without written
authorization from you.
Task
Estimated Cost ($)
Labor Expenses 1
Task 1: Data Acquisition and Review $9,000 --
Task 2: Evaluate Lift Station Improvements and ALCS Application $17,600 --
Task 3: Evaluate York Avenue Pond Improvements $13,100 $1,300
Task 4: Planning-Level Cost Estimates for Selected Alternatives $6,100 --
Task 5: Technical Memorandum $13,000 --
Estimated Total $60,100
1 Expenses associated with bathymetric survey and sediment core sampling.
Assuming a start date of February 21, 2024, and assuming ice-out by late April or early May (for
bathymetric and sediment survey work), we anticipate that the York Avenue Pond feasibility study can be
complete by August of 2024.
Ross Bintner, PE February 15, 2024
Page 6
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2024\SW\City Requests\05 York Ave Pond Improvements\Proposal\York Ave S Pond Improvements_v04.docx
We propose to complete this work on a time and expense basis and will begin work as soon as the City
provides notice to proceed. Barr will complete the proposed scope of work in accordance with the Master
Agreement for Professional Engineering Services.
Please contact me (952.832.2860, sstratton@barr.com) or Michael McKinney (308.672.2692,
mmckinney@barr.com) if you have any questions about the scope of work or estimated cost. We look
forward to assisting the City of Edina with the feasibility study outlined in this proposed scope of work.
Sincerely,
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
Sarah Stratton
Its Vice President
Accepted this ____________ day of ___________________, 20____
City of Edina
By
Its
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.F.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Contract Change No. 1 with Davey
Resource Group for Bredesen Park Restoration
Project
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve contract changes with Davey Resource Group for the Bredesen Park Restoration Project.
INTRODUCTION:
The original contract was approved by Council at their February 20, 2024 meeting. Davey has requested changes
to the contract to clarify indemnity and insurance requirements. T hese changes are shown on pages 6-10 of the
attachment. Pages 11-15 reflect the revised contract with the requested changes incorporated and authorized by
Davey Resource Group. The City Attorney has reviewed these changes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Bredesen Change No. 1 Contract
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.G.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: Professional Services for
Concept Design for Interlachen Boulevard
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for Concept Design for Interlachen Boulevard with WSB for $24,686.
INTRODUCTION:
This contract will determine the feasibility of placing a trail along Interlachen Boulevard from east of the new
roundabout at Blake Road to Mirror Lakes Drive. The goal of the study is to determine possible widths, impacts
and retaining walls related to Municipal State Aid roadway and trail design standards.
This work will inform staff whether or not a trail could be built as a stand-alone project or if it has to be built in
combination with street reconstruction. It will also influence the capital improvement plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request for Purchase: Professional Services for Concept Design Interlachen Boulevard
Interlachen Concept Design Services Agreement
Request for Purchase
Requisition Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400086
Department: Engineering
Buyer: Chad Millner
Date: 03/12/2024
Requisition Description: Professional Services for Concept Design Interlachen Boulevard
Vendor: WSB & ASSOCIATES
Cost: $24,686.00
REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE: SERVICE CONTRACT
DESCRIPTION:
This contract will determine the feasibility of placing a trail along Interlachen Boulevard from east of the
new roundabout at Blake Road to Mirror Lakes Drive. The goal of the study is to determine possible
widths, impacts and retaining walls related to Municipal State Aid roadway and trail design standards.
This work will inform staff whether or not a trail could be built as a stand-alone project or if it has to be
built in combination with street reconstruction . It will also influence the capital improvement plan.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This purchase is funded from the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS).
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:
This service contract will consider access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and
convenience in the design. It is necessary to improve the infrastructure and comply with the City’s Living
Streets Policy as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”.
A future trail could provide an improved connection to the Southwest Light Rail Transit Station on Blake
Road just north of Excelsior Boulevard in Hopkins.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract
C:\Plots\Interlachen Preliminary\Letter Proposal-rev2.docx701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COMMarch 6, 2024
Mr. Chad Millner, PE
Director of Engineering
City of Edina
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
Re: Feasibility of Interlachen Boulevard Trail/Roadway Configuration (from Blake Road to Mirror
Lakes Drive)
Dear Mr. Millner:
WSB is pleased to submit this scope of services to determine the feasibility of placing a trail along
Interlachen Boulevard from east of the new roundabout at Blake Road to Mirror Lakes Drive. This section
is currently a gap in the trail network for the area.
The goal of this study is to determine what may be designed for the location and width of the roadway and
trail, determine land impacts and need for retaining walls and preliminary costs.
Below is a summary of our proposed scope.
CONSULTANT SERVICES
Task 1 - Project Management
1.1 – General Coordination
Project Management is an essential task to ensure the project remains on schedule and on budget. Andrew
Plowman will serve as the project manager on the project, and it will be his duty to perform a majority of
the tasks to make this project successful. He will provide monthly project budget and schedule reports to
ensure the project is moving forward.
1.2 – Project Meetings
Andrew will facilitate project meetings to review progress, brainstorm ideas and coordinate with other
additional agencies or property owners. Project management team (PMT) meetings will be held on a
monthly basis. WSB will be responsible for developing the agenda for each meeting, materials and
meeting minutes. It is assumed 2 additional meetings will be held with property owners and/or agencies.
Task 2 – Preliminary Design
2.1 – Concept Design
WSB will develop one option for the corridor. This may include design of shifting the roadway to the
north or south, placing the trail on the north or south side and analyzing different lane and trail widths.
2.2 – Construction Limits
WSB will generate construction limits based on the typical sections and the design alternatives. The
construction limits will aid in determining costs, impacts to utilities, aquatic resources and right of way. It
is not anticipated we will obtain survey data, but instead utilize lidar data to develop high level profiles and
impacts.
Mr. Chad MIllner, PE
February 13, 2024
Page 2
C:\Plots\Interlachen Preliminary\Letter Proposal-rev2.docx
2.3– Preliminary Hydraulic Impact Design
Preliminary hydraulic design will be developed for the concept design. This will include determining
watershed requirements and potential ponding needs.
2.4 – Cost Estimates
WSB will complete cost estimates for the alternative. This will include the cost of the construction
improvements.
2.5 – Feasibility Memo
WSB will complete a high-level memo, explaining assumptions and costs.
Assumptions
The following assumptions apply to this proposal:
No survey or wetland delineation will be completed with this phase of the project
The trail will not connect to the existing Interlachen County Club pedestrian bridge
Analysis of existing utilities (public or private) will be completed, however a high level analysis
of overhead utilities such as power poles will be analyzed if clearly evident.
Schedule
It is anticipated the analysis will be completed by May, 2024.
PROPOSED FEE
We understand this project cost is based on WSB’s standard rates. We propose to complete this project for
the below proposed fee below:
Total Project Fee: ..............................................................................$24,686
I have attached a summary of our fees based upon the above scope of work. WSB will invoice the City of
Edina for the actual hours worked at each employee classification with the current WSB hourly rate up to
the Total Project Fee.
ACCEPTANCE:
This letter represents our entire understanding of the project scope. If the scope and fee appear to be
appropriate, please sign on the space provided and return one copy to our office. We are available to begin
work once we receive signed authorization.
Sincerely,
WSB
Andrew Plowman, P.E.
Sr. Project Manager
Signature:
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.H.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Matthew Gabb, Sustainability Specialist
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2024-25: Approving Shade Tree
Program Bonding Grant Agreement
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution No. 2024-25 Approving the Shade Tree P rogram Bonding Grant Agreement.
INTRODUCTION:
The City applied for and received $480,000 from the DNR’s Shade Tree Program Bonding Grants. These funds
will be used to replace ash trees hazardous to public safety with diverse and climate adaptive tree species. For
every one hazardous ash tree removed, it will be replaced with two new resilient trees.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution No. 2024-25: Approving Shade Tree Program Bonding Grant Agreement
Grant Agreement for the Edina Shade Tree Project
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-25
AUTHORIZING SHADE TREE PROGRAM
BONDING GRANT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied for and received a grant from the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources under the Shade Tree Program Bonding Grant in the amount of $480,000 to replace
hazardous ash trees on public land with diverse and climate adaptive tree species, making Edina’s tree
canopy safer for the public and more resilient to changes in Minnesota’s climate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant
No. ENG24300 and authorizes the City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf.
Passed and adopted: March 19, 2024.
Attest:_________________________ ______________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
March 19, 2024, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2024.
___________________________
City Clerk
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
General Obligation Bond Proceeds
Grant Agreement - Construction Grant
for the
City of Edina Shade Tree Project
under the
MN NATURAL RESOURCES SHADE
TREE
Program
1 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds i Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECITALS
Article I - DEFINITIONS Section 1.01 – Defined Terms
Article II - GRANT
Section 2.01 – Grant of Monies Section 2.02 – Public Ownership Section 2.03 – Use of Grant Proceeds Section 2.04 – Operation of the Real Property and Facility
Section 2.05 – Public Entity Representations and Warranties
Section 2.06 – Ownership by Leasehold or Easement Section 2.07 – Event(s) of Default Section 2.08 – Remedies Section 2.09 – Notification of Event of Default
Section 2.10 – Survival of Event of Default
Section 2.11 – Term of Grant Agreement Section 2.12 – Modification and/or Early Termination of Grant Section 2.13 – Excess Funds
Article III – USE CONTRACTS
Section 3.01 – General Provisions Section 3.02 – Initial Term and Renewal Section 3.03 – Reimbursement of Counterparty Section 3.04 – Receipt of Monies Under a Use Contract
Article IV – SALE Section 4.01 – Sale Section 4.02 – Proceeds of a Sale
Article V – COMPLIANCE WITH G.O. COMPLIANCE LEGISLATION
AND THE COMMISSIONER’S ORDER Section 5.01 – State Bond Financed Property Section 5.02 – Preservation of Tax Exempt Status Section 5.03 – Changes to G.O. Compliance Legislation or the
Commissioner’s Order
Article VI – DISBURSEMENT OF GRANT PROCEEDS Section 6.01– The Advances Section 6.02 – Draw Requisitions
Section 6.03 – Additional Funds
Section 6.04 – Conditions Precedent to Any Advance Section 6.05 – Construction Inspections
2 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds ii Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Article VII- MISCELLANEOUS
Section 7.01 – Insurance
Section 7.02 – Condemnation Section 7.03 – Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations Section 7.04 – Records Keeping and Reporting Section 7.05 – Inspections by State Entity
Section 7.06 – Data Practices
Section 7.07 – Non-Discrimination Section 7.08 – Worker’s Compensation Section 7.09 – Antitrust Claims Section 7.10 – Review of Plans and Cost Estimates
Section 7.11 – Prevailing Wages
Section 7.12 – Liability Section 7.13 – Indemnification by the Public Entity Section 7.14 – Relationship of the Parties Section 7.15 – Notices
Section 7.16 – Binding Effect and Assignment or Modification
Section 7.17 – Waiver Section 7.18 – Entire Agreement Section 7.19 – Choice of Law and Venue Section 7.20 – Severability
Section 7.21 – Time of Essence
Section 7.22 – Counterparts Section 7.23 – Matching Funds Section 7.24 – Source and Use of Funds Section 7.25 – Project Completion Schedule
Section 7.26 – Third-Party Beneficiary
Section 7.27 – Public Entity Tasks Section 7.28 – State Entity and Commissioner Required Acts and Approvals. Section 7.29 – Applicability to Real Property and Facility
Section 7.30 – E-Verification
Section 7.31 – Additional Requirements Attachment I – DECLARATION Attachment II – LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY
Attachment III – SOURCE AND USE OF FUNDS
Attachment IV – PROJECT COMPLETION SCHEDULE Attachment V – GRANT APPLICATION Attachment VI – THREE YEAR MAINTENANCE PLAN
3 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
General Obligation Bond Proceeds Grant Agreement – Construction Grant for the
City of Edina Shade Tree Project under the
MN Natural Resources Shade Tree Program
THIS AGREEMENT shall be effective as of February 28th , 2024, and is between City of Edina, a Statutory City - Plan B (the “Public Entity”), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry (the “State Entity”). RECITALS
A. The State Entity has created and is operating a MN Natural Resources Shade Tree (the “State Program”) under the authority granted by Minn. Stat. § 88.82 and all rules related to such legislation (the “State Program Enabling Legislation”).
B. Under the State Program, the State Entity is authorized to provide grants that are funded
with proceeds of state general obligation bonds authorized to be issued under Article XI, § 5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution. C. Under the State Program the recipients of a grant must use such funds to perform those
functions delineated in the State Program Enabling Legislation.
D. The Public Entity submitted, if applicable, a grant application to the State Entity in which the Public Entity requests a grant from the State Program the proceeds of which will be used for the purposes delineated in such grant application.
E. The Public Entity has applied to and been selected by the State Entity for a receipt of a grant from the State Program in an amount of $ 480,000.00 Four Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars (the “Program Grant”), the proceeds must be used by the Public Entity to perform those
functions and activities imposed by the State Entity under the State Program and, if applicable,
delineated in that certain grant application (the “Grant Application”) attached hereto as Attachment V that the Public Entity submitted to the State Entity. F. Under the provisions contained in Minnesota Statute §412.221, the Public Entity has
been given the authority to perform those functions and activities required of it under the State
Program and, if applicable, delineated in the Grant. G. The Public Entity’s receipt and use of the Program Grant to acquire an ownership interest in and/or improve real property (the “Real Property”) and, if applicable, structures situated
thereon (the “Facility”) will cause the Public Entity’s ownership interest in all of such real property
and structures to become “state bond financed property”, as such term is used in Minn. Stat. §
4 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
16A.695 (the “G.O. Compliance Legislation”) and in that certain “Fourth Order Amending Order of the Commissioner of Finance Relating to Use and Sale of State Bond Financed Property”
executed by the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget and dated July 30, 2012, as
amended (the “Commissioner’s Order”), even though such funds may only be a portion of the funds being used to acquire such ownership interest and/or improve such real property and structures and that such funds may be used to only acquire such ownership interest and/or improve a part of such real property and structures.
H. The Public Entity and the State Entity desire to set forth herein the provisions relating to the granting and disbursement of the proceeds of the Program Grant to the Public Entity and the operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility.
IN CONSIDERATION of the grant described and other provisions in this Agreement, the
parties to this Agreement agree as follows. Article I DEFINITIONS
Section 1.01 Defined Terms. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings set out respectively after each such term (the meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined), unless the context specifically indicates otherwise:
“Advance(s)” – means an advance made or to be made by the State Entity to the Public Entity and disbursed in accordance with the provisions contained in Article VI hereof. “Agreement” - means this General Obligation Bond Proceeds Grant Agreement -
Construction Grant for the City of Edina Shade Tree Project under the MN Natural Resources
Shade Tree Program, as such exists on its original date and any amendments, modifications or restatements thereof. “Approved Debt” – means public or private debt of the Public Entity that is consented
to and approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB, the proceeds of which were or
will used to acquire an ownership interest in or improve the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, other than the debt on the G.O. Bonds. Approved Debt includes, but is not limited to, all debt delineated in Attachment III to this Agreement; provided, however, the Commissioner of MMB is not bound by any amounts delineated in such attachment unless
he/she has consented, in writing, to such amounts.
“Architect”, if any - means Not Applicable, which will administer the Construction Contract Documents on behalf of the Public Entity.
“Code” - means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and
all treasury regulations, revenue procedures and revenue rulings issued pursuant thereto.
5 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
“Commissioner of MMB” - means the commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget, and any designated representatives thereof.
“Commissioner’s Order” - means the “Fourth Order Amending Order of the Commissioner of Finance Relating to Use and Sale of State Bond Financed Property” executed by the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget and dated July 30, 2012, as amended.
“Completion Date” – means December 31, 2027, the date of projected completion of the Project. “Contractor” - means any person engaged to work on or to furnish materials and
supplies for the Construction Items including, if applicable, a general contractor.
“Construction Contract Documents” - means the document or documents, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, including but not limited to any construction plans and specifications and any exhibits, amendments, change orders, modifications thereof or
supplements thereto, which collectively form the contract between the Public Entity and the
Contractor or Contractors for the completion of the Construction Items on or before the Completion Date for either a fixed price or a guaranteed maximum price. “Construction Items” – means the work to be performed under the Construction
Contract Documents.
“Counterparty” - means any entity with which the Public Entity contracts under a Use Contract. This definition is only needed and only applies if the Public Entity enters into an agreement with another party under which such other party will operate the Real Property,
and if applicable, Facility. For all other circumstances this definition is not needed and
should be ignored and treated as if it were left blank, and any reference to this term in this
Agreement shall be ignored and treated as if the reference did not exist. “Declaration” - means a declaration, or declarations, in the form contained in
Attachment I to this Agreement and all amendments thereto, indicating that the Public
Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility is bond financed property within the meaning of the G.O. Compliance Legislation and is subject to certain restrictions imposed thereby.
“Draw Requisition” - means a draw requisition that the Public Entity, or its designee,
submits to the State Entity when an Advance is requested, as referred to in Section 6.02. “Event of Default” - means one or more of those events delineated in Section 2.07.
“Facility”, if applicable, - means Not Applicable, which is located, or will be
constructed and located, on the Real Property and all equipment that is a part thereof that was purchased with the proceeds of the Program Grant.
6 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
“Fair Market Value” – means either (i) the price that would be paid by a willing and qualified buyer to a willing and qualified seller as determined by an appraisal that assumes
that all liens and encumbrances on the property being sold that negatively affect the value of
such property, will be paid and released, or (ii) the price bid by a purchaser under a public bid procedure after reasonable public notice, with the proviso that all liens and encumbrances on the property being sold that negatively affect the value of such property, will be paid and released at the time of acquisition by the purchaser.
“G.O. Bonds” - means that portion of the state general obligation bonds issued under the authority granted in Article XI, § 5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution the proceeds of which are used to fund the Program Grant and any bonds issued to refund or replace such bonds.
“G.O. Compliance Legislation” - means Minn. Stat. § 16A.695, as it may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time unless such amendment, modification or replacement imposes an unconstitutional impairment of a contract right.
“Grant Application” – means that certain grant application attached hereto as Attachment V that the Public Entity submitted to the State Entity. This definition is only
needed and only applies if the Public Entity submitted a grant application to the State Entity. If the Public Entity did not submit a grant application to the State Entity, then this definition is not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were left blank, and any reference
to this term in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated as if the reference did not exist.
“Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs” – means the cost to acquire the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility if the Public Entity does not already possess the required ownership interest, and the costs of betterments of the
Real Property and, if applicable, Facility; provided, however, the Commissioner of MMB is
not bound by any specific amount of such alleged costs unless he/she has consented, in writing, to such amount. “Inspecting Engineer”, if any - means the State Entity's construction inspector, or its
designated consulting engineer.
“Leased/Easement Premises” - means the real estate and structures, if any, that are leased to the Public Entity under a Real Property/Facility Lease or granted to the Public Entity under an easement. This definition is only needed and only applies if the Public
Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property, the Facility, if applicable, or both is by way
of a leasehold interest under a Real Property/Facility Lease or by way of an easement. For
all other circumstances this definition is not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were left blank, and any reference to this term in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated as if the reference did not exist.
“Lessor/Grantor” – means the fee owner/lessor or grantor of the Leased/Easement Premises. This definition is only needed and only applies if the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property, the Facility, if applicable, or both, is by way of a leasehold
7 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
interest under a Real Property/Facility Lease or by way of an easement. For all other circumstances this definition is not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were
left blank, and any reference to this term in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated as
if the reference did not exist. “Outstanding Balance of the Program Grant” – means the portion of the Program Grant that has been disbursed to or on behalf of the Public Entity minus any portions thereof
previously paid back to the Commissioner of MMB.
“Ownership Value”, if any – means the value, if any, of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that existed concurrent with the Public Entity’s execution of this Agreement. Such value shall be established by way of an appraisal
or by such other manner as may be acceptable to the State Entity and the Commissioner of
MMB. The parties hereto agree and acknowledge that such value is $ ______________ or ____ Not Applicable; provided, however, the Commissioner of MMB is not bound by any inserted dollar amount unless he/she has consented, in writing, to such amount. If no dollar amount is inserted and the blank “Not Applicable” is not checked, a rebuttable presumption
that the Ownership Value is $0.00 shall be created. (The blank “Not Applicable” should
only be selected and checked when a portion of the funds delineated in Attachment III
attached hereto are to be used to acquire the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and in such event the value of such ownership interest should be shown in Attachment III and not in this definition for Ownership Value).
“Program Grant” - means a grant of monies from the State Entity to the Public Entity in the amount identified as the “Program Grant” in Recital E to this Agreement, as the amount thereof may be modified under the provisions contained herein.
“Project” - means the Public Entity’s acquisition, if applicable, of the ownership
interests in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility denoted in Section 2.02 along with the performance of activities denoted in Section 2.03. (If the Public Entity is not using any portion of the Program Grant to acquire the ownership interest denoted in Section 2.02, then this definition for Project shall not include the acquisition of such ownership interest, and
the value of such ownership interest shall not be included in Attachment III hereto and
instead shall be included in the definition for Ownership Value under this Section.) “Public Entity” - means the entity identified as the “Public Entity” in the lead-in paragraph of this Agreement.
“Real Property” - means the real property located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described in Attachment II to this Agreement. “Real Property/Facility Lease” - means a long term lease of the Real Property, the
Facility, if applicable, or both by the Public Entity as lessee thereunder. This definition is
only needed and only applies if the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property,
the Facility, if applicable, or both is a leasehold interest under a lease. For all other circumstances this definition is not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were
8 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
left blank, and any reference to this term in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated as if the reference did not exist.
“State Entity” - means the entity identified as the “State Entity” in the lead-in paragraph of this Agreement. “State Program” – means the program delineated in the State Program Enabling
Legislation.
“State Program Enabling Legislation” – means the legislation contained in the Minnesota statute(s) delineated in Recital A and all rules related to such legislation.
“Subsequent Betterment Costs” – means the costs of betterments of the Real Property
and, if applicable, Facility that occur subsequent to the date of this Agreement, are not part of the Project, would qualify as a public improvement of a capital nature (as such term in used in Minn. Constitution Art. XI, §5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution), and the cost of which has been established by way of written documentation that is acceptable to and
approved, in writing, by the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB.
“Use Contract” - means a lease, management contract or other similar contract between the Public Entity and any other entity that involves or relates to any part of the Real Property and/or, if applicable, Facility. This definition is only needed and only applies if the Public
Entity enters into an agreement with another party under which such other party will operate
the Real Property and/or, if applicable, Facility. For all other circumstances this definition
is not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were left blank, and any reference to this term in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated as if the reference did not exist.
“Useful Life of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility” – means the term set forth
in Section 2.05.X, which was derived as follows: (i) 30 years for Real Property that has no structure situated thereon or if any structures situated thereon will be removed, and no new structures will be constructed thereon, (ii) the remaining useful life of the Facility as of the effective date of this Agreement for Facilities that are situated on the Real Property as of the
date of this Agreement, that will remain on the Real Property, and that will not be bettered,
or (iii) the useful life of the Facility after the completion of the construction or betterments for Facilities that are to be constructed or bettered. Article II
GRANT Section 2.01 Grant of Monies. The State Entity shall make and issue the Program Grant to the Public Entity, and disburse the proceeds in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Program Grant is not intended to be a loan even though the portion thereof that
is disbursed may need to be returned to the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB under certain
circumstances.
9 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 2.02 Public Ownership. The Public Entity acknowledges and agrees that the Program Grant is being funded with the proceeds of G.O. Bonds, and as a result thereof all of the
Real Property and, if applicable, Facility must be owned by one or more public entities. Such
ownership may be in the form of fee ownership, a Real Property/Facility Lease, or an easement. In order to establish that this public ownership requirement is satisfied, the Public Entity represents and warrants to the State Entity that it has, or will acquire, the following ownership interests in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and, in addition, that it possess, or will possess, all
easements necessary for the operation, maintenance and management of the Real Property and, if
applicable, Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04: (Check the appropriate box for the Real Property and, if applicable, for the Facility.)
Ownership Interest in the Real Property.
X Fee simple ownership of the Real Property.
A Real Property/Facility Lease for the Real Property that complies with the
requirements contained in Section 2.06.
(If the term of the Real Property/Facility Lease is for a term authorized by a Minnesota statute, rule or session law, then insert the citation: ________________.)
An easement for the Real Property that complies with the requirements
contained in Section 2.06. (If the term of the easement is for a term authorized by a Minnesota statute, rule or session law, then insert the citation: ________________.)
Ownership Interest in, if applicable, the Facility.
Fee simple ownership of the Facility.
A Real Property/Facility Lease for the Facility that complies with all of the
requirements contained in Section 2.06.
(If the term of the Real Property/Facility Lease is for a term authorized by a Minnesota statute, rule or session law, then insert the citation: ______________.)
X Not applicable because there is no Facility.
10 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 2.03 Use of Grant Proceeds. The Public Entity shall use the Program Grant solely to reimburse itself for expenditures it has already made, or will make, in the performance
of the following activities, and may not use the Program Grant for any other purpose.
(Check all appropriate boxes.)
Acquisition of fee simple title to the Real Property.
Acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Real Property.
Acquisition of an easement for the Real Property.
X Improvement of the Real Property.
Acquisition of fee simple title to the Facility.
Acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Facility.
Construction of the Facility.
Renovation of the Facility.
X Remove and/or plant shade trees on public land as described in the Deliverables..
(Describe other or additional purposes.)
Section 2.04 Operation of the Real Property and Facility. The Real Property and, if
applicable, Facility must be used by the Public Entity or the Public Entity must cause such Real
Property and, if applicable, Facility to be used for those purposes required by the State Program and in accordance with the information contained in the Grant Application, or for such other purposes and uses as the Minnesota legislature may from time to time designate, and for no other purposes or uses.
The Public Entity may enter into Use Contracts with Counterparties for the operation of all or any portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility; provided that all such Use Contracts must have been approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB and fully comply with all of the provisions contained in Sections 3.01, 3.02 and 3.03.
The Public Entity must, whether it is operating the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility or has contracted with a Counterparty under a Use Contract to operate all or any portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, annually determine that the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility is being used for the purpose required by this Agreement, and shall annually
supply a statement, sworn to before a notary public, to such effect to the State Entity and the
Commissioner of MMB.
11 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
For those programs, if any, that the Public Entity will directly operate on all or any portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, the Public Entity covenants with and represents
and warrants to the State Entity that: (i) it has the ability and a plan to fund such programs, (ii) it
has demonstrated such ability by way of a plan that it submitted to the State Entity, and (iii) it will annually adopt, by resolution, a budget for the operation of such programs that clearly shows that forecast program revenues along with other funds available for the operation of such program will be equal to or greater than forecast program expenses for each fiscal year, and will supply to the
State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB certified copies of such resolution and budget.
For those programs, if any, that will be operated on all or any portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility by a Counterparty under a Use Contract, the Public Entity covenants with and represents and warrants to the State Entity that: (i) it will not enter into such Use Contract
unless the Counterparty has demonstrated that it has the ability and a plan to fund such program,
(ii) it will require the Counterparty to provide an initial program budget and annual program budgets that clearly show that forecast program revenues along with other funds available for the operation of such program (from all sources) will be equal to or greater than forecast program expenses for each fiscal year, (iii) it will promptly review all submitted program budgets to
determine if such budget clearly and accurately shows that the forecast program revenues along
with other funds available for the operation of such program (from all sources) will be equal to or greater than forecast program expenses for each fiscal year, (iv) it will reject any program budget that it believes does not accurately reflect forecast program revenues or expenses or does not show that forecast program revenues along with other funds available for the operation of such program
(from all sources) will be equal to or greater than forecast program expenses, and require the
Counterparty to prepare and submit a revised program budget, and (v) upon receipt of a program budget that it believes accurately reflects forecast program revenues and expenses and that shows that forecast program revenues along with other funds available for the operation of such program (from all sources) will be equal to or greater than forecast program expenses, it will approve such
budget by resolution and supply to the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB certified copies
of such resolution and budget. Section 2.05 Public Entity Representations and Warranties. The Public Entity further covenants with, and represents and warrants to the State Entity as follows:
A. It has legal authority to enter into, execute, and deliver this Agreement, the Declaration, and all documents referred to herein, and it has taken all actions necessary to its execution and delivery of such documents.
B. It has legal authority to use the Program Grant for the purpose or purposes
described in the State Program Enabling Legislation. C. It has legal authority to operate the State Program and the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility for the purposes required by the State Program and for the functions and
activities proposed in the Grant Application.
12 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
D. This Agreement, the Declaration, and all other documents referred to herein are the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Public Entity enforceable against the Public
Entity in accordance with their respective terms.
E. It will comply with all of the terms, conditions, provisions, covenants, requirements, and warranties in this Agreement, the Declaration, and all other documents referred to herein.
F. It will comply with all of the provisions and requirements contained in and imposed by the G.O. Compliance Legislation, the Commissioner’s Order, and the State Program.
G. It has made no material false statement or misstatement of fact in connection with
its receipt of the Program Grant, and all of the information it has submitted or will submit to the State Entity or Commissioner of MMB relating to the Program Grant or the disbursement of any of the Program Grant is and will be true and correct.
H. It is not in violation of any provisions of its charter or of the laws of the State of
Minnesota, and there are no actions, suits, or proceedings pending, or to its knowledge threatened, before any judicial body or governmental authority against or affecting it relating to the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, or its ownership interest therein, and it is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction, decree, or demand of any court or any
governmental authority which would impair its ability to enter into this Agreement, the
Declaration, or any document referred to herein, or to perform any of the acts required of it in such documents. I. Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Declaration, or any
document referred to herein nor compliance with any of the terms, conditions, requirements,
or provisions contained in any of such documents is prevented by, is a breach of, or will result in a breach of, any term, condition, or provision of any agreement or document to which it is now a party or by which it is bound.
J. The contemplated use of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility will not
violate any applicable zoning or use statute, ordinance, building code, rule or regulation, or any covenant or agreement of record relating thereto. K. The Project will be completed in full compliance with all applicable laws,
statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political
subdivisions having jurisdiction over the Project. L. All applicable licenses, permits and bonds required for the performance and completion of the Project have been, or will be, obtained.
M. All applicable licenses, permits and bonds required for the operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04 have been, or will be, obtained.
13 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
N. It will operate, maintain, and manage the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility
or cause the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, to be operated, maintained and
managed in compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility.
O. It will fully enforce the terms and conditions contained in any Use Contract.
P. It has complied with the matching funds requirement, if any, contained in Section 7.23.
Q. It will not, without the prior written consent of the State Entity and the
Commissioner of MMB, allow any voluntary lien or encumbrance or involuntary lien or encumbrance that can be satisfied by the payment of monies and which is not being actively contested to be created or exist against the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, or the Counterparty’s interest in the Use Contract,
whether such lien or encumbrance is superior or subordinate to the Declaration. Provided,
however, the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB will consent to any such lien or encumbrance that secures the repayment of a loan the repayment of which will not impair or burden the funds needed to operate the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04, and for which the entire amount is used (i) to acquire
additional real estate that is needed to so operate the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility
in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04 and will be included in and as part of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and/or (ii) to pay for capital improvements that are needed to so operate the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under
Section 2.04.
R. It reasonably expects to possess the ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility described Section 2.02 for the entire Useful Life of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and it does not expect to sell such ownership interest.
S. It does not reasonably expect to receive payments under a Use Contract in excess of the amount the Public Entity needs and is authorized to use to pay the operating expenses of the portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract or to pay the principal, interest, redemption premiums, and other expenses on any
Approved Debt.
T. It will supply, or cause to be supplied, whatever funds are needed above and beyond the amount of the Program Grant to complete and fully pay for the Project.
U. The Construction Items will be completed substantially in accordance with the
Construction Contract Documents by the Completion Date, and all such items along with, if applicable, the Facility will be situated entirely on the Real Property.
14 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
V. It will require the Contractor or Contractors to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws bearing on its performance under the Construction Contract
Documents.
W. It has or will promptly record a fully executed Declaration with the appropriate governmental office and deliver a copy thereof to the State Entity and to Minnesota Management and Budget (attention: Capital Projects Manager) that contains all of the
recording information.
X. The Useful Life of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility is 30 years. Y. It shall furnish such satisfactory evidence regarding the representations and
warranties described herein as may be required and requested by either the State Entity or
the Commissioner of MMB. Section 2.06 Ownership by Leasehold or Easement. This Section shall only apply if the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property, the Facility, if applicable, or both is by
way of a Real Property/Facility Lease or an easement. For all other circumstances this Section is
not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were left blank, and any reference to this
Section in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated as if the reference did not exist. A. A Real Property/Facility Lease or easement must comply with the following
provisions.
1. It must be in form and contents acceptable to the Commissioner of MMB, and specifically state that it may not be modified, restated, amended, changed in any way, or prematurely terminated or cancelled without the prior written consent and
authorization by the Commissioner of MMB.
2. It must be for a term that is equal to or greater than 125% of the Useful Life of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, or such other period of time specifically authorized by a Minnesota statute, rule or session law.
3. Any payments to be made under it by the Public Entity, whether designated as rent or in any other manner, must be by way of a single lump sum payment that is due and payable on the date that it is first made and entered into.
4. It must not contain any requirements or obligations of the Public Entity that
if not complied with could result in a termination thereof. 5. It must contain a provision that provides sufficient authority to allow the Public Entity to operate the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance
with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04.
15 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
6. It must not contain any provisions that would limit or impair the Public Entity’s operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance with
the requirements imposed under Section 2.04.
7. It must contain a provision that prohibits the Lessor/Grantor from creating or allowing, without the prior written consent of the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB, any voluntary lien or encumbrance or involuntary lien or encumbrance that
can be satisfied by the payment of monies and which is not being actively contested
against the Leased/Easement Premises or the Lessor’s/Grantor’s interest in the Real Property/Facility Lease or easement, whether such lien or encumbrance is superior or subordinate to the Declaration. Provided, however, the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB will consent to any such lien or encumbrance if the holder of
such lien or encumbrance executes and files of record a document under which such
holder subordinates such lien or encumbrance to the Real Property/Facility Lease or easement and agrees that upon foreclosure of such lien or encumbrance to be bound by and comply with all of the terms, conditions and covenants contained in the Real Property/Facility Lease or easement as if such holder had been an original
Lessor/Grantor under the Real Property/Facility Lease or easement.
8. It must acknowledge the existence of this Agreement and contain a provision that the terms, conditions and provisions contained in this Agreement shall control over any inconsistent or contrary terms, conditions and provisions contained in
the Real Property/Facility Lease or easement.
9. It must provide that any use restrictions contained therein only apply as long as the Public Entity is the lessee under the Real Property/Facility Lease or grantee under the easement, and that such use restrictions will terminate and not apply to any
successor lessee or grantee who purchases the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the
Real Property/Facility Lease or easement. Provided, however, it may contain a provisions that limits the construction of any new structures on the Real Property or modifications of any existing structures on the Real Property without the written consent of Lessor/Grantor, which will apply to any such successor lessee or grantee.
10. It must allow for a transfer thereof in the event that the lessee under the Real Property/Lease or grantee under the easement makes the necessary determination to sell its interest therein, and allow such interest to be transferred to the purchaser of such interest.
11. It must contain a provision that prohibits and prevents the sale of the underlying fee interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility without first obtaining the written consent of the Commissioner of MMB.
12 The Public Entity must be the lessee under the Real Property/Lease or
grantee under the easement.
16 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
B. The provisions contained in this Section are not intended to and shall not prevent the Public Entity from including additional provisions in the Real Property/Facility Lease or
easement that are not inconsistent with or contrary to the requirements contained in this
Section. C. The expiration of the term of a Real Property/Facility Lease or easement shall not be an event that requires the Public Entity to reimburse the State Entity for any portion of the
Program Grant, and upon such expiration the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real
Property and, if applicable, Facility shall no longer be subject to this Agreement. D. The Public Entity shall fully and completely comply with all of the terms, conditions and provisions contained in a Real Property/Facility Lease or easement, and shall
obtain and file, in the Office of the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles, whichever is
applicable, the Real Property/Facility Lease or easement or a short form or memorandum thereof. Section 2.07 Event(s) of Default. The following events shall, unless waived in writing
by the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB, constitute an Event of Default under this
Agreement upon either the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB giving the Public Entity 30 days written notice of such event and the Public Entity’s failure to cure such event during such 30 day time period for those Events of Default that can be cured within 30 days or within whatever time period is needed to cure those Events of Default that cannot be cured within 30 days as long
as the Public Entity is using its best efforts to cure and is making reasonable progress in curing
such Events of Default, however, in no event shall the time period to cure any Event of Default exceed 6 months unless otherwise consented to, in writing, by the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB.
A. If any representation, covenant, or warranty made by the Public Entity in this
Agreement, in any Draw Requisition, in any other document furnished pursuant to this Agreement, or in order to induce the State Entity to disburse any of the Program Grant, shall prove to have been untrue or incorrect in any material respect or materially misleading as of the time such representation, covenant, or warranty was made.
B. If the Public Entity fails to fully comply with any provision, term, condition, covenant, or warranty contained in this Agreement, the Declaration, or any other document referred to herein.
C. If the Public Entity fails to fully comply with any provision, term, condition,
covenant or warranty contained in the G.O. Compliance Legislation, the Commissioner’s Order, or the State Program Enabling Legislation. D. If the Public Entity fails to complete the Project, or cause the Project to be
completed, by the Completion Date.
E. If the Public Entity fails to provide and expend the full amount of the matching funds, if any, required under Section 7.23 for the Project.
17 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
F. If the Public Entity fails to record the Declaration and deliver copies thereof as
set forth in Section 2.05.W.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any of the above delineated events that cannot be cured shall, unless waived in writing by the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB, constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement immediately upon either the State Entity or the Commissioner of
MMB giving the Public Entity written notice of such event.
Section 2.08 Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default and at any time thereafter until such Event of Default is cured to the satisfaction of the State Entity, the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB may enforce any or all of the following remedies.
A. The State Entity may refrain from disbursing the Program Grant; provided, however, the State Entity may make such disbursements after the occurrence of an Event of Default without thereby waiving its rights and remedies hereunder.
B. If the Event of Default involves a failure to comply with any of the provisions
contained herein other than the provisions contained in Sections 4.01 or 4.02, then the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, may demand that the Outstanding Balance of the Program Grant be returned to it, and upon such demand the Public Entity shall return such amount to the Commissioner of MMB.
C. If the Event of Default involves a failure to comply with the provisions contained in Sections 4.01 or 4.02, then the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, may demand that the Public Entity pay the amounts that would have been paid if there had been full and complete compliance with such provisions, and upon such demand
the Public Entity shall pay such amount to the Commissioner of MMB.
D. Either the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, may enforce any additional remedies they may have in law or equity.
The rights and remedies herein specified are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or
remedies that the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB would otherwise possess. If the Public Entity does not repay the amounts required to be paid under this Section or under any other provision contained in this Agreement within 30 days of demand by the
Commissioner of MMB, or any amount ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction within 30
days of entry of judgment against the Public Entity and in favor of the State Entity and/or the Commissioner of MMB, then such amount may, unless precluded by law, be taken from or off-set against any aids or other monies that the Public Entity is entitled to receive from the State of Minnesota.
Section 2.09 Notification of Event of Default. The Public Entity shall furnish to the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB, as soon as possible and in any event within 7 days after it has obtained knowledge of the occurrence of each Event of Default or each event which
18 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both would constitute an Event of Default, a statement setting forth details of each Event of Default or event which with the giving of notice or upon the
lapse of time or both would constitute an Event of Default and the action which the Public Entity
proposes to take with respect thereto. Section 2.10 Survival of Event of Default. This Agreement shall survive any and all Events of Default and remain in full force and effect even upon the payment of any amounts due
under this Agreement, and shall only terminate in accordance with the provisions contained in
Section 2.12 and at the end of its term in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 2.11. Section 2.11 Term of Grant Agreement. This Agreement shall, unless earlier terminated in accordance with any of the provisions contained herein, remain in full force and
effect for the time period starting on the effective date hereof and ending on the date that
corresponds to the date established by adding a time period equal to 125% of Useful Life of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility to the date on which the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility is first used for the operation of the State Program after such effective date. If there are no uncured Events of Default as of such date this Agreement shall terminate and no longer be of
any force or effect, and the Commissioner of MMB shall execute whatever documents are needed
to release the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility from the effect of this Agreement and the Declaration. Section 2.12 Modification and/or Early Termination of Grant. If the Project is not
started on or before the date that is 5 years from the effective date of this Agreement or all of the
Program Grant has not been disbursed as of the date that is 4 years from the date on which the Project is started, or such later dates to which the Public Entity and the State Entity may agree in writing, then the State Entity’s obligation to fund the Program Grant shall terminate. In such event, (i) if none of the Program Grant has been disbursed by such dates then the State Entity’s
obligation to fund any portion of the Program Grant shall terminate and this Agreement shall
terminate and no longer be of any force or effect, and (ii) if some but not all of the Program Grant has been disbursed by such dates then the State Entity shall have no further obligation to provide any additional funding for the Program Grant and this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect but shall be modified and amended to reflect the amount of the Program Grant that was
actually disbursed as of such date. This provision shall not, in any way, affect the Public Entity’s
obligation to complete the Project by the Completion Date. This Agreement shall also terminate and no longer be of any force or effect upon the Public Entity’s sale of its ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance
with the provisions contained in Section 4.01 and transmittal of all or a portion of the proceeds of
such sale to the Commissioner of MMB in compliance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02, or upon the termination of Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility if such ownership interest is by way of an easement or under a Real Property/Facility Lease. Upon such termination the State Entity shall execute, or have
executed, and deliver to the Public Entity such documents as are required to release the Public
Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, from the effect of this Agreement and the Declaration.
19 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section. 2.13 Excess Funds. If the full amount of the Program Grant and any matching funds referred to in Section 7.23 are not needed to complete the Project, then, unless language in
the State Program Enabling Legislation indicates otherwise, the Program Grant shall be reduced
by the amount not needed. Article III USE CONTRACTS
This Article III and its contents is only needed and only applies if the Public Entity enters into an
agreement with another party under which such other party will operate any portion of the Real Property, and if applicable, Facility. For all other circumstances this Article III and its contents are not needed and should be ignored and treated as if it were left blank, and any reference to this
Article III, its contents, and the term Use Contract in this Agreement shall be ignored and treated
as if the references did not exist. Section 3.01 General Provisions. If the Public Entity has statutory authority to enter into a Use Contract, then it may enter into Use Contracts for various portions of the Real Property and,
if applicable, Facility; provided that each and every Use Contract that the Public Entity enters into
must comply with the following requirements: A. The purpose for which it was entered into must be to operate the State Program in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility.
B. It must contain a provision setting forth the statutory authority under which the Public Entity is entering into such contract, and must comply with the substantive and procedural provisions of such statute.
C. It must contain a provision stating that it is being entered into in order for the
Counterparty to operate the State Program and must describe such program. D. It must contain a provision that will provide for oversight by the Public Entity. Such oversight may be accomplished by way of a provision that will require the Counterparty
to provide to the Public Entity: (i) an initial program evaluation report for the first fiscal year
that the Counterparty will operate the State Program, (ii) program budgets for each succeeding fiscal year showing that forecast program revenues and additional revenues available for the operation of the State Program (from all sources) by the Counterparty will equal or exceed expenses for such operation for each succeeding fiscal year, and (iii) a
mechanism under which the Public Entity will annually determine that the Counterparty is
using the portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract to operate the State Program. E. It must allow for termination by the Public Entity in the event of a default
thereunder by the Counterparty, or in the event that the State Program is terminated or
changed in a manner that precludes the operation of such program in the portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract.
20 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
F. It must terminate upon the termination of the statutory authority under which the Public Entity is operating the State Program.
G. It must require the Counterparty to pay all costs of operation and maintenance of that portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract, unless the Public Entity is authorized by law to pay such costs and agrees to pay such costs.
H. If the Public Entity pays monies to a Counterparty under a Use Contract, such Use Contract must meet the requirements of Rev. Proc. 97-13, 1997-1 CB 632, so that such Use Contract does not result in “private business use” under Section 141(b) of the Code.
I. It must be approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB, and any Use
Contract that is not approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB shall be null and void and of no force or effect. J. It must contain a provision requiring that each and every party thereto shall, upon
direction by the Commissioner of MMB, take such actions and furnish such documents to
the Commissioner of MMB as the Commissioner of MMB determines to be necessary to ensure that the interest to be paid on the G.O. Bonds is exempt from federal income taxation. K. It must contain a provision that prohibits the Counterparty from creating or
allowing, without the prior written consent of the State Entity and the Commissioner of
MMB, any voluntary lien or encumbrance or involuntary lien or encumbrance that can be satisfied by the payment of monies and which is not being actively contested against the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, or the Counterparty’s interest in the Use Contract, whether such
lien or encumbrance is superior or subordinate to the Declaration. Provided, however, the
State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB will consent, in writing, to any such lien or encumbrance that secures the repayment of a loan the repayment of which will not impair or burden the funds needed to operate the portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract in the manner specified in Section 2.04 and
for which the entire amount is used (i) to acquire additional real estate that is needed to so
operate the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04 and will be included in and as part of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and/or (ii) to pay for capital improvements that are needed to so operate the Real Property and, if applicable,
Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04.
L. If the amount of the Program Grant exceeds $200,000.00, then it must contain a provision requiring the Counterparty to list any vacant or new positions it may have with state workforce centers as required by Minn. Stat. § 116L.66, as it may be amended, modified
or replaced from time to time, for the term of the Use Contract.
M. It must contain a provision that clearly states that the Public Entity is not required to renew the Use Contract beyond the original term thereof and that the Public Entity may,
21 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
at its sole option and discretion, allow the Use Contract to expire at the end of its original term and thereafter directly operate the governmental program in the Real Property and, if
applicable, Facility or contract with some other entity to operate the governmental program
in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. Section 3.02 Initial Term and Renewal. The initial term for a Use Contract may not exceed the lesser of (i) 50% of the Useful Life of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility for
the portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract,
or (ii) the shortest term of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. A Use Contract may allow for renewals beyond its initial term on the conditions that (a) the
term of any renewal may not exceed the initial term, (b) the Public Entity must make a
determination that renewal will continue to carry out the State Program and that the Counterparty is suited and able to perform the functions contained in Use Contract that is to be renewed, (c) the Use Contract may not include any provisions that would require, either directly or indirectly, the Public Entity to either make the determination referred to in this Section or to renew the Use
Contract with the Counterparty after the expiration of the initial term or any renewal term, and (d)
no such renewal may occur prior to the date that is 6 months prior to the date on which the Use Contract is scheduled to terminate. Provided, however, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein the Public Entity’s voluntary agreement to reimburse the Counterparty for any investment that the Counterparty provided for the acquisition or betterment of the Real Property
and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract if the Public Entity does not renew
a Use Contract if requested by the Counterparty is not deemed to be a provision that directly or indirectly requires the Public Entity to renew such Use Contract. Section 3.03 Reimbursement of Counterparty. A Use Contract may but need not
contain, at the sole option and discretion of the Public Entity, a provision that requires the Public
Entity to reimburse the Counterparty for any investment that the Counterparty provided for the acquisition or betterment of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that is the subject of the Use Contract if the Public Entity does not renew a Use Contract if requested by the Counterparty. If agreed to by the Public Entity, such reimbursement shall be on terms and conditions agreed to
by the Public Entity and the Counterparty.
Section 3.04 Receipt of Monies Under a Use Contract. The Public Entity does not anticipate the receipt of any funds under a Use Contract; provided, however, if the Public Entity does receive any monies under a Use Contract in excess of the amount the Public Entity needs and
is authorized to use to pay the operating expenses of the portion of the Real Property and, if
applicable, Facility that is the subject of a Use Contract, and to pay the principal, interest, redemption premiums, and other expenses on Approved Debt, then a portion of such excess monies must be paid by the Public Entity to the Commissioner of MMB. The portion of such excess monies that the Public Entity must and shall pay to the Commissioner of MMB shall be determined
by the Commissioner of MMB, and absent circumstances which would indicate otherwise such
portion shall be determined by multiplying such excess monies by a fraction the numerator of which is the Program Grant and the denominator of which is sum of the Program Grant and the Approved Debt.
22 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Article IV
SALE Section 4.01 Sale. The Public Entity shall not sell any part of its ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility unless all of the following provisions have been complied with fully.
A. The Public Entity determines, by official action, that such ownership interest is no longer usable or needed for the operation of the State Program, which such determination may be based on a determination that the portion of the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility to which such ownership interest applies is no longer suitable or financially feasible
for such purpose.
B. The sale is made as authorized by law. C. The sale is for Fair Market Value.
D. The written consent of the Commissioner of MMB has been obtained. The acquisition of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility at a foreclosure sale, by acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or
enforcement of a security interest in personal property used in the operation thereof, by a
lender that has provided monies for the acquisition of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in or betterment of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility shall not be considered a sale for the purposes of this Agreement if after such acquisition the lender operates such portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in a manner which is not inconsistent with
the requirements imposed under Section 2.04 and the lender uses its best efforts to sell such
acquired interest to a third party for Fair Market Value. The lender’s ultimate sale or disposition of the acquired interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility shall be deemed to be a sale for the purposes of this Agreement, and the proceeds thereof shall be disbursed in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02.
The Public Entity may participate in any public auction of its ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility and bid thereon; provided that the Public Entity agrees that if it is the successful purchaser it will not use any part of the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility for the State Program.
Section 4.02 Proceeds of a Sale. Upon the sale of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility the proceeds thereof after the deduction of all costs directly associated and incurred in conjunction with such sale and such other costs that are approved, in writing by the Commissioner of MMB, but not including the repayment of any debt
associated with the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable,
Facility, shall be disbursed in the following manner and order.
23 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
A. The first distribution shall be to the Commissioner of MMB in an amount equal to the Outstanding Balance of the Program Grant, and if the amount of such net proceeds
shall be less than the amount of the Outstanding Balance of the Program Grant then all of
such net proceeds shall be distributed to the Commissioner of MMB. B. The remaining portion, after the distribution specified in Section 4.02.A, shall be distributed to (i) pay in full any outstanding Approved Debt, (ii) reimburse the Public Entity
for its Ownership Value, and (iii) to pay interested public and private entities, other than any
such entity that has already received the full amount of its contribution (such as the State Entity under Section 4.02.A and the holders of Approved Debt paid under this Section 4.02.B), the amount of money that such entity contributed to the Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs and the Subsequent Betterment Costs. If such remaining portion is not
sufficient to reimburse interested public and private entities for the full amount that such
entities contributed to the acquisition or betterment of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, then the amount available shall be distributed as such entities may agree in writing, and if such entities cannot agree by an appropriately issued court order.
C. The remaining portion, after the distributions specified in Sections 4.02.A and B,
shall be divided and distributed to the State Entity, the Public Entity, and any other public and private entity that contributed funds to the Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs and the Subsequent Betterment Costs, other than lenders who supplied any of such funds, in proportion to the contributions that the State Entity, the Public Entity, and such other public
and private entities made to the acquisition and betterment of the Real Property and, if
applicable, Facility as such amounts are part of the Ownership Value, Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs, and Subsequent Betterment Costs. The distribution to the State Entity shall be made to the Commissioner of MMB, and the
Public Entity may direct its distribution to be made to any other entity including, but not limited
to, a Counterparty. All amounts to be disbursed under this Section 4.02 must be consented to, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB, and no such disbursements shall be made without such consent.
The Public Entity shall not be required to pay or reimburse the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB for any funds above and beyond the full net proceeds of such sale, even if such net proceeds are less than the amount of the Outstanding Balance of the Program Grant.
24 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Article V COMPLIANCE WITH G.O. COMPLIANCE LEGISLATION
AND THE COMMISSIONER’S ORDER Section 5.01 State Bond Financed Property. The Public Entity and the State Entity acknowledge and agree that the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility is, or when acquired by the Public Entity will be, “state bond financed
property”, as such term is used in the G.O. Compliance Legislation and the Commissioner’s Order,
and, therefore, the provisions contained in such statute and order apply, or will apply, to the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility and any Use Contracts relating thereto.
Section 5.02 Preservation of Tax Exempt Status. In order to preserve the tax-exempt
status of the G.O. Bonds, the Public Entity agrees as follows: A. It will not use the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, or use or invest the Program Grant or any other sums treated as “bond proceeds” under Section 148 of the Code
including “investment proceeds,” “invested sinking funds,” and “replacement proceeds,” in
such a manner as to cause the G.O. Bonds to be classified as “arbitrage bonds” under Section 148 of the Code. B. It will deposit into and hold all of the Program Grant that it receives under this
Agreement in a segregated non-interest bearing account until such funds are used for
payments for the Project in accordance with the provisions contained herein. C. It will, upon written request, provide the Commissioner of MMB all information required to satisfy the informational requirements set forth in the Code including, but not
limited to, Sections 103 and 148 thereof, with respect to the GO Bonds.
D. It will, upon the occurrence of any act or omission by the Public Entity or any Counterparty that could cause the interest on the GO Bonds to no longer be tax exempt and upon direction from the Commissioner of MMB, take such actions and furnish such
documents as the Commissioner of MMB determines to be necessary to ensure that the
interest to be paid on the G.O. Bonds is exempt from federal taxation, which such action may include either: (i) compliance with proceedings intended to classify the G.O. Bonds as a “qualified bond” within the meaning of Section 141(e) of the Code, (ii) changing the nature or terms of the Use Contract so that it complies with Revenue Procedure 97-13, as amended
by Rev. Proc 2016-44 and Rev. Proc. 2017-13, with Revenue Procedure 97-13, as amended
by Rev. Proc 2016-44 and Rev. Proc. 2017-13, or (iii) changing the nature of the use of the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility so that none of the net proceeds of the G.O. Bonds will be used, directly or indirectly, in an “unrelated trade or business” or for any “private business use” (within the meaning of Sections 141(b) and 145(a) of the Code), or (iv)
compliance with other Code provisions, regulations, or revenue procedures which amend or
supersede the foregoing.
25 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
E. It will not otherwise use any of the Program Grant, including earnings thereon, if any, or take or permit to or cause to be taken any action that would adversely affect the
exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the G.O. Bonds, nor omit to take
any action necessary to maintain such tax exempt status, and if it should take, permit, omit to take, or cause to be taken, as appropriate, any such action, it shall take all lawful actions necessary to rescind or correct such actions or omissions promptly upon having knowledge thereof..
Section 5.03 Changes to G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner’s Order. In the event that the G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner’s Order is amended in a manner that reduces any requirement imposed against the Public Entity, or if the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility is exempt from the G.O.
Compliance Legislation and the Commissioner’s Order, then upon written request by the Public
Entity the State Entity shall enter into and execute an amendment to this Agreement to implement herein such amendment to or exempt the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility from the G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner’s Order.
Article VI DISBURSEMENT OF GRANT PROCEEDS Section 6.01 The Advances. The State Entity agrees, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein, to make Advances from the Program Grant to the Public Entity from
time to time in an aggregate total amount not to exceed the amount of the Program Grant. If the
amount of Program Grant that the State Entity cumulatively disburses hereunder to the Public Entity is less than the amount of the Program Grant delineated in Section 1.01, then the State Entity and the Public Entity shall enter into and execute whatever documents the State Entity may request in order to amend or modify this Agreement to reduce the amount of the Program Grant to the
amount actually disbursed. Provided, however, in accordance with the provisions contained in
Section 2.11, the State Entity’s obligation to make Advances shall terminate as of the dates specified in such Section even if the entire Program Grant has not been disbursed by such dates. Advances shall only be for expenses that (i) are for those items of a capital nature for the
Project, (ii) accrued no earlier than the effective date of the legislation that appropriated the funds
that are used to fund the Program Grant, or (iii) have otherwise been consented to, in writing, by the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB. It is the intent of the parties hereto that the rate of disbursement of the Advances shall not
exceed the rate of completion of the Project or the rate of disbursement of the matching funds
required, if any, under Section 7.23. Therefore, the cumulative amount of all Advances disbursed by the State Entity at any point in time shall not exceed the portion of the Project that has been completed and the percentage of the matching funds required, if any, under Section 7.23 that have been disbursed as of such point in time. This requirement is expressed by way of the following
two formulas:
26 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Formula #1 Cumulative Advances < (Program Grant) × (percentage of matching funds, if any, required
under Section 7.23 that have been disbursed)
Formula #2 Cumulative Advances < (Program Grant) × (percentage of Project completed)
Section 6.02 Draw Requisitions. Whenever the Public Entity desires a disbursement of
a portion of the Program Grant, which shall be no more often than once each calendar month, the Public Entity shall submit to the State Entity a Draw Requisition duly executed on behalf of the Public Entity or its designee. Each Draw Requisition shall be submitted on or between the 1st day and the 15th day of the month in which an Advance is requested, and shall be submitted at least 7
calendar days before the date the Advance is desired. Each Draw Requisition with respect to
construction items shall be limited to amounts equal to: (i) the total value of the classes of the work by percentage of completion as approved by the Public Entity and the State Entity, plus (ii) the value of materials and equipment not incorporated in the Project but delivered and suitably stored on or off the Real Property in a manner acceptable to the State Entity, less (iii) any applicable
retainage, and less (iv) all prior Advances.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Advances for materials stored on or off the Real Property will be made by the State Entity unless the Public Entity shall advise the State Entity, in writing, of its intention to so store materials prior to their delivery and the State Entity
has not objected thereto.
At the time of submission of each Draw Requisition, other than the final Draw Requisition, the Public Entity shall submit to the State Entity such supporting evidence as may be requested by the State Entity to substantiate all payments which are to be made out of the relevant Draw
Requisition or to substantiate all payments then made with respect to the Project.
At the time of submission of the final Draw Requisition which shall not be submitted before completion of the Project, including all landscape requirements and off-site utilities and streets needed for access to the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility and correction of material defects
in workmanship or materials (other than the completion of punch list items) as provided in the
Construction Contract Documents, the Public Entity shall submit to the State Entity: (i) such supporting evidence as may be requested by the State Entity to substantiate all payments which are to be made out of the final Draw Requisition or to substantiate all payments then made with respect to the Project, and (ii) satisfactory evidence that all work requiring inspection by municipal
or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction has been duly inspected and approved by
such authorities, and that all requisite certificates of occupancy and other approvals have been issued. If on the date an Advance is desired the Public Entity has complied with all requirements of
this Agreement and the State Entity approves the relevant Draw Requisition and receives a current
construction report from the Inspecting Engineer recommending payment, then the State Entity shall disburse the amount of the requested Advance to the Public Entity.
27 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 6.03 Additional Funds. If the State Entity shall at any time in good faith determine that the sum of the undisbursed amount of the Program Grant plus the amount of all
other funds committed to the Project is less than the amount required to pay all costs and expenses
of any kind which reasonably may be anticipated in connection with the Project, then the State Entity may send written notice thereof to the Public Entity specifying the amount which must be supplied in order to provide sufficient funds to complete the Project. The Public Entity agrees that it will, within 10 calendar days of receipt of any such notice, supply or have some other entity
supply the amount of funds specified in the State Entity's notice.
Section 6.04 Conditions Precedent to Any Advance. The obligation of the State Entity to make any Advance hereunder (including the initial Advance) shall be subject to the following conditions precedent:
A. The State Entity shall have received a Draw Requisition for such Advance specifying the amount of funds being requested, which such amount when added to all prior requests for an Advance shall not exceed the amount of the Program Grant delineated in Section 1.01.
B. The State Entity shall have either received a duly executed Declaration that has been duly recorded in the appropriate governmental office, with all of the recording information displayed thereon, or evidence that such Declaration will promptly be recorded and delivered to the State Entity.
C. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that (i) the Public Entity has legal authority to and has taken all actions necessary to enter into this Agreement and the Declaration, and (ii) this Agreement and the Declaration are binding on and enforceable against the Public Entity.
D. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that the Public Entity has sufficient funds to fully and completely pay for the Project and all other expenses that may occur in conjunction therewith.
E. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable
to the State Entity, that the Public Entity is in compliance with the matching funds requirements, if any, contained in Section 7.23. F. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable
to the State Entity, showing that the Public Entity possesses the ownership interest delineated
in Section 2.02. G. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and the contemplated
use thereof are permitted by and will comply with all applicable use or other restrictions and
requirements imposed by applicable zoning ordinances or regulations, and, if required by law, have been duly approved by the applicable municipal or governmental authorities having jurisdiction thereover.
28 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
H. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable
to the State Entity, that that all applicable and required building permits, other permits, bonds
and licenses necessary for the Project have been paid for, issued, and obtained, other than those permits, bonds and licenses which may not lawfully be obtained until a future date or those permits, bonds and licenses which in the ordinary course of business would normally not be obtained until a later date.
I. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that that all applicable and required permits, bonds and licenses necessary for the operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04 have been paid for, issued, and obtained, other than those permits, bonds and
licenses which may not lawfully be obtained until a future date or those permits, bonds and
licenses which in the ordinary course of business would normally not be obtained until a later date. J. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable
to the State Entity, that the Project will be completed in a manner that will allow the Real
Property and, if applicable, Facility to be operated in the manner specified in Section 2.04. K. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that the Public Entity has the ability and a plan to fund the operation of
the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04.
L. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that the insurance requirements under Section 7.01 have been satisfied.
M. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable
to the State Entity, of compliance with the provisions and requirements specified in Section 7.10 and all additional applicable provisions and requirements, if any, contained in Minn. Stat. § 16B.335, as it may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time. Such evidence shall include, but not be limited to, evidence that: (i) the predesign package referred
to in Section 7.10.B has, if required, been reviewed by and received a favorable
recommendation from the Commissioner of Administration for the State of Minnesota, (ii) the program plan and cost estimates referred to in Section 7.10.C have, if required, received a recommendation by the Chairs of the Minnesota State Senate Finance Committee and Minnesota House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee, and (iii) the Chair and
Ranking Minority Member of the Minnesota House of Representatives Capital Investment
Committee and the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Minnesota Senate Capital Investment Committee have, if required, been notified pursuant to Section 7.10.G. N. No Event of Default under this Agreement or event which would constitute an
Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or that a period of grace or time
elapse shall have occurred and be continuing.
29 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
O. The State Entity shall have received evidence, in form and substance acceptable to the State Entity, that the Contractor will complete the Construction Items substantially in
conformance with the Construction Contract Documents and pay all amounts lawfully owing
to all laborers and materialmen who worked on the Construction Items or supplied materials therefor, other than amounts being contested in good faith. Such evidence may be in the form of payment and performance bonds in amounts equal to or greater than the amount of the fixed price or guaranteed maximum price contained in the Construction Contract
Documents that name the State Entity and the Public Entity dual obligees thereunder, or such
other evidence as may be acceptable to the Public Entity and the State Entity. P. No determination shall have been made by the State Entity that the amount of funds committed to the Project is less than the amount required to pay all costs and expenses
of any kind that may reasonably be anticipated in connection with the Project, or if such a
determination has been made and notice thereof sent to the Public Entity under Section 6.03, then the Public Entity has supplied, or has caused some other entity to supply, the necessary funds in accordance with such section or has provided evidence acceptable to the State Entity that sufficient funds are available.
Q. The Public Entity has supplied to the State Entity all other items that the State Entity may reasonably require. Section 6.05 Construction Inspections. The Public Entity and the Architect, if any, shall
be responsible for making their own inspections and observations of the Construction Items, and
shall determine to their own satisfaction that the work done or materials supplied by the Contractors to whom payment is to be made out of each Advance has been properly done or supplied in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents. If any work done or materials supplied by a Contractor are not satisfactory to the Public Entity or the Architect, if any, or if a
Contractor is not in material compliance with the Construction Contract Documents in any respect,
then the Public Entity shall immediately notify the State Entity, in writing. The State Entity and the Inspecting Engineer, if any, may conduct such inspections of the Construction Items as either may deem necessary for the protection of the State Entity's interest, and that any inspections which may be made of the Project by the State Entity or the Inspecting Engineer, if any, are made and all
certificates issued by the Inspecting Engineer, if any, will be issued solely for the benefit and
protection of the State Entity, and the Public Entity will not rely thereon. Article VII MISCELLANEOUS
Section 7.01 Insurance. The Public Entity shall, upon acquisition of the ownership interest delineated in Section 2.02, insure the Facility, if such exists, in an amount equal to the full insurable value thereof (i) by self insuring under a program of self insurance legally adopted, maintained and adequately funded by the Public Entity, or (ii) by way of builders risk insurance
and fire and extended coverage insurance with a deductible in an amount acceptable to the State
Entity under which the State Entity and the Public Entity are named as loss payees. If damages which are covered by such required insurance occur, then the Public Entity shall, at its sole option and discretion, either: (y) use or cause the insurance proceeds to be used to fully or partially repair
30 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
such damage and to provide or cause to be provided whatever additional funds that may be needed to fully or partially repair such damage, or (z) sell its ownership interest in the damaged Facility
and portion of the Real Property associated therewith in accordance with the provisions contained
in Section 4.01. If the Public Entity elects to only partially repair such damage, then the portion of the insurance proceeds not used for such repair shall be applied in accordance with the provisions
contained in Section 4.02 as if the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and
Facility had been sold, and such amounts shall be credited against the amounts due and owing under Section 4.02 upon the ultimate sale of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility. If the Public Entity elects to sell its ownership interest in the damaged Facility and portion of the Real Property associated therewith, then such sale must occur within a
reasonable time period from the date the damage occurred and the cumulative sum of the insurance
proceeds plus the proceeds of such sale must be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02, with the insurance proceeds being so applied within a reasonable time period from the date they are received by the Public Entity.
The State Entity agrees to and will assign or pay over to the Public Entity all insurance
proceeds it receives so that the Public Entity can comply with the requirements that this Section imposes thereon as to the use of such insurance proceeds. If the Public Entity elects to maintain general comprehensive liability insurance regarding
the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, then the Public Entity shall have the State Entity
named as an additional named insured therein. The Public Entity may require a Counterparty to provide and maintain any or all of the insurance required under this Section; provided that the Public Entity continues to be responsible
for the providing of such insurance in the event that the Counterparty fails to provide or maintain
such insurance. At the written request of either the State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB, the Public Entity shall promptly furnish to the requesting entity all written notices and all paid premium
receipts received by the Public Entity regarding the required insurance, or certificates of insurance
evidencing the existence of such required insurance. If the Public Entity fails to provide and maintain the insurance required under this Section, then the State Entity may, at its sole option and discretion, obtain and maintain insurance of an
equivalent nature and any funds expended by the State Entity to obtain or maintain such insurance
shall be due and payable on demand by the State Entity and bear interest from the date of advancement by the State Entity at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per annum based upon a 365-day year. Provided, however, nothing contained herein, including but not limited to this Section, shall require the State Entity to obtain or maintain
such insurance, and the State Entity’s decision to not obtain or maintain such insurance shall not
lessen the Public Entity’s duty to obtain and maintain such insurance.
31 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 7.02 Condemnation. If after the Public Entity has acquired the ownership interest delineated in Section 2.02 all or any portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility
is condemned to an extent that the Public Entity can no longer comply with the provisions
contained in Section 2.04, then the Public Entity shall, at its sole option and discretion, either: (i) use or cause the condemnation proceeds to be used to acquire an interest in additional real property needed for the Public Entity to continue to comply with the provisions contained in Section 2.04 and, if applicable, to fully or partially restore the Facility and to provide or cause to be provided
whatever additional funds that may be needed for such purposes, or (ii) sell the remaining portion
of its ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.01. Any condemnation proceeds which are not used to acquire an interest in additional real property or to restore, if applicable, the Facility shall be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02 as if the Public Entity’s ownership
interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility had been sold, and such amounts shall be
credited against the amounts due and owing under Section 4.02 upon the ultimate sale of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the remaining Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. If the Public Entity elects to sell its ownership interest in the portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility that remains after the condemnation, then such sale must occur within a reasonable time
period from the date the condemnation occurred and the cumulative sum of the condemnation
proceeds plus the proceeds of such sale must be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02, with the condemnation proceeds being so applied within a reasonable time period from the date they are received by the Public Entity.
As recipient of any of condemnation awards or proceeds referred to herein, the State Entity
agrees to and will disclaim, assign or pay over to the Public Entity all of such condemnation awards or proceeds it receives so that the Public Entity can comply with the requirements that this Section imposes upon the Public Entity as to the use of such condemnation awards or proceeds.
Section 7.03 Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations. The Public Entity shall (i)
keep the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, in good condition and repair, subject to reasonable and ordinary wear and tear, (ii) complete promptly and in good and workmanlike manner any building or other improvement which may be constructed on the Real Property and promptly restore in like manner any portion of the Facility, if applicable, which may be damaged
or destroyed thereon and pay when due all claims for labor performed and materials furnished
therefor, (iii) comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, requirements, covenants, conditions and restrictions now or hereafter affecting the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, or any part thereof, or requiring any alterations or improvements thereto, (iv) keep and maintain abutting grounds, sidewalks, roads, parking and landscape areas in good and neat order and repair, (v)
comply with the provisions of any Real Property/Facility Lease if the Public Entity’s ownership
interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, is a leasehold interest, (vi) comply with the provisions of any easement if its ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility is by way of such easement, and (vii) comply with the provisions of any condominium documents and any applicable reciprocal easement or operating agreements if the Real Property
and, if applicable, Facility, is part of a condominium regime or is subject to a reciprocal easement
or use contract.
32 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
The Public Entity shall not, without the written consent of the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB, (a) permit or suffer the use of any of the Real Property or, if applicable,
Facility, for any purpose other than the purposes specified in Section 2.04, (b) remove, demolish
or substantially alter any of the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, except such alterations as may be required by laws, ordinances or regulations or such other alterations as may improve such Real Property or, if applicable, Facility by increasing the value thereof or improving its ability to be used to operate the State Program thereon or therein, (c) do any act or thing which would unduly
impair or depreciate the value of the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, (d) abandon the Real
Property or, if applicable, Facility, (e) commit or permit any waste or deterioration of the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, (f) remove any fixtures or personal property from the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility, that was paid for with the proceeds of the Program Grant unless the same are immediately replaced with like property of at least equal value and utility, or (g)
commit, suffer or permit any act to be done in or upon the Real Property or, if applicable, Facility,
in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation. If the Public Entity fails to maintain the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility in accordance with the provisions contained in this Section, then the State Entity may perform
whatever acts and expend whatever funds that are necessary to so maintain the Real Property and,
if applicable, Facility and the Public Entity irrevocably authorizes and empowers the State Entity to enter upon the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, to perform such acts as may to necessary to so maintain the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. Any actions taken or funds expended by the State Entity hereunder shall be at its sole option and discretion, and nothing
contained herein, including but not limited to this Section, shall require the State Entity to take any
action, incur any expense, or expend any funds, and the State Entity shall not be responsible for or liable to the Public Entity or any other entity for any such acts that are undertaken and performed in good faith and not in a negligent manner. Any funds expended by the State Entity to perform such acts as may to necessary to so maintain the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility shall be
due and payable on demand by the State Entity and bear interest from the date of advancement by
the State Entity at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per annum based upon a 365 day year. Section 7.04 Records Keeping and Reporting. The Public Entity shall maintain or cause
to be maintained books, records, documents and other evidence pertaining to the costs or expenses
associated with the Project and operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility needed to comply with the requirements contained in this Agreement, the G.O. Compliance Legislation, the Commissioner’s Order, and the State Program Enabling Legislation, and upon request shall allow or cause the entity which is maintaining such items to allow the State Entity, auditors for the
State Entity, the Legislative Auditor for the State of Minnesota, or the State Auditor for the State
of Minnesota, to inspect, audit, copy, or abstract, all of such items. The Public Entity shall use or cause the entity which is maintaining such items to use generally accepted accounting principles in the maintenance of such items, and shall retain or cause to be retained (i) all of such items that relate to the Project for a period of 6 years from the date that the Project is fully completed and
placed into operation, and (ii) all of such items that relate to the operation of the Real Property
and, if applicable, Facility for a period of 6 years from the date such operation is initiated.
33 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 7.05 Inspections by State Entity. Upon reasonable request by the State Entity and without interfering with the normal use of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, the
Public Entity shall allow, and will require any entity to whom it leases, subleases, or enters into a
Use Contract for any portion of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility to allow the State Entity to inspect the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. Section 7.06 Data Practices. The Public Entity agrees with respect to any data that it
possesses regarding the Program Grant, the Project, or the operation of the Real Property and, if
applicable, Facility, to comply with all of the provisions and restrictions contained in the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act contained in Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes that exists as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced from time to time.
Section 7.07 Non-Discrimination. The Public Entity agrees to not engage in discriminatory employment practices regarding the Project, or operation or management of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and it shall, with respect to such activities, fully comply with all of the provisions contained in Chapters 363A and 181 of the Minnesota Statutes that exist
as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced
from time to time. Section 7.08 Worker’s Compensation. The Public Entity agrees to comply with all of the provisions relating to worker’s compensation contained in Minn. Stat. §§ 176.181, subd. 2 and
176.182, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time, with respect to the
Project and the operation or management of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. Section 7.09 Antitrust Claims. The Public Entity hereby assigns to the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB all claims it may have for overcharges as to goods or services provided
with respect to the Project, and operation or management of the Real Property and, if applicable,
Facility that arise under the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota or of the United States of America. Section 7.10 Review of Plans and Cost Estimates. The Public Entity agrees to comply
with all applicable provisions and requirements, if any, contained in Minn. Stat. § 16B.335, as it
may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time, for the Project, and in accordance therewith the Public Entity agrees to comply with the following provisions and requirements if such provisions and requirements are applicable.
A. The Public Entity shall provide all information that the State Entity may request
in order for the State Entity to determine that the Project will comply with the provisions and requirements contained in Minn. Stat. § 16B.335, as it may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time.
B. Prior to its proceeding with design activities for the Project the Public Entity shall
prepare a predesign package and submit it to the Commissioner of Administration for the State of Minnesota for review and comment. The predesign package must be sufficient to define the purpose, scope, cost, and projected schedule for the Project, and must demonstrate
34 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
that the Project has been analyzed according to appropriate space and needs standards. Any substantial changes to such predesign package must be submitted to the Commissioner of
Administration for the State of Minnesota for review and comment.
C. If the Project includes the construction of a new building, substantial addition to an existing building, a substantial change to the interior configuration of an existing building, or the acquisition of an interest in land, then the Public Entity shall not prepare final plans
and specifications until it has prepared a program plan and cost estimates for all elements
necessary to complete the Project and presented them to the Chairs of the Minnesota State Senate Finance Committee and Minnesota House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee and the chairs have made their recommendations, and it has notified the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Minnesota House of Representatives Capital
Investment Committee and the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Minnesota State
Senate Capital Investment Committee. The program plan and cost estimates must note any significant changes in the work to be performed on the Project, or in its costs, which have arisen since the appropriation from the legislature for the Project was enacted or which differ from any previous predesign submittal.
D. The Public Entity must notify the Chairs and Ranking Minority Members of the Minnesota State Senate Finance and Capital Investment Committees, and the Minnesota House of Representatives Capital Investment and Ways and Means Committees of any significant changes to the program plan and cost estimates referred to in Section 7.10.C.
E. The program plan and cost estimates referred to in Section 7.10.C must ensure that the Project will comply with all applicable energy conservation standards contained in law, including Minn. Stat. §§ 216C.19 to 216C.20, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time, and all rules adopted thereunder.
F. If any of the Program Grant is to be used for the construction or remodeling of the Facility, then both the predesign package referred to in Section 7.10.B and the program plan and cost estimates referred to in Section 7.10.C must include provisions for cost-effective information technology investments that will enable the occupant of the Facility to
reduce its need for office space, provide more of its services electronically, and decentralize
its operations. G. If the Project does not involve the construction of a new building, substantial addition to an existing building, substantial change to the interior configuration of an existing
building, or the acquisition of an interest in land, then prior to beginning work on the Project
the Public Entity shall just notify the Chairs and Ranking Minority Members of the Minnesota State Senate Finance and Capital Investment Committees, and the Minnesota House of Representatives Capital Investment and Ways and Means Committees that the work to be performed is ready to begin.
H. The Project must be: (i) substantially completed in accordance with the program plan and cost estimates referred to in Section 7.10.C, (ii) completed in accordance with the
35 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
time schedule contained in the program plan referred to in Section 7.10.C, and (iii) completed within the budgets contained in the cost estimates referred to in Section 7.10.C.
Provided, however, the provisions and requirements contained in this Section only apply to public lands or buildings or other public improvements of a capital nature, and shall not apply to the demolition or decommissioning of state assets, hazardous material projects, utility infrastructure projects, environmental testing, parking lots, parking structures, park and ride
facilities, bus rapid transit stations, light rail lines, passenger rail projects, exterior lighting,
fencing, highway rest areas, truck stations, storage facilities not consisting primarily of offices or heated work areas, roads, bridges, trails, pathways, campgrounds, athletic fields, dams, floodwater retention systems, water access sites, harbors, sewer separation projects, water and wastewater facilities, port development projects for which the Commissioner of Transportation for the State
of Minnesota has entered into an assistance agreement under Minn. Stat. § 457A.04, as it may be
amended, modified or replaced from time to time, ice centers, local government projects with a construction cost of less than $1,500,000.00, or any other capital project with a construction cost of less than $750,000.00.
Section 7.11 Prevailing Wages. The Public Entity agrees to comply with all of the
applicable provisions contained in Chapter 177 of the Minnesota Statutes, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. §§ 177.41 through 177.435, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project and the operation of the State Program on or in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. By agreeing to this provision, the Public Entity
is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Project or the operation of
the State Program on or in the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. Section 7.12 Liability. The Public Entity and the State Entity agree that they will, subject to any indemnifications provided herein, be responsible for their own acts and the results thereof
to the extent authorized by law, and they shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and
the results thereof. The liability of the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB is governed by the provisions contained in Minn. Stat. § 3.736, as it may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time. If the Public Entity is a “municipality” as such term is used in Chapter 466 of the Minnesota Statutes that exists as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently
be amended, modified or replaced from time to time, then the liability of the Public Entity,
including but not limited to the indemnification provided under Section 7.13, is governed by the provisions contained in such Chapter 466. Section 7.13 Indemnification by the Public Entity. The Public Entity shall bear all loss,
expense (including attorneys’ fees), and damage in connection with the Project and operation of
the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, and the State of Minnesota, their agents, servants and employees from all claims, demands and judgments made or recovered against the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, and the State of Minnesota, their agents, servants and employees,
because of bodily injuries, including death at any time resulting therefrom, or because of damages
to property of the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota, or others (including loss of use) from any cause whatsoever, arising out of, incidental to, or in connection with the Project or operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, whether or not due
36 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
to any act of omission or commission, including negligence of the Public Entity or any contractor or his or their employees, servants or agents, and whether or not due to any act of omission or
commission (excluding, however, negligence or breach of statutory duty) of the State Entity, the
Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota, their employees, servants or agents. The Public Entity further agrees to indemnify, save, and hold the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, and the State of Minnesota, their agents and employees, harmless from
all claims arising out of, resulting from, or in any manner attributable to any violation by the Public
Entity, its officers, employees, or agents, or by any Counterparty, its officers, employees, or agents, of any provision of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including legal fees and disbursements paid or incurred to enforce the provisions contained in Section 7.06.
The Public Entity’s liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried
by or provided by the Public Entity, or subject to any exclusions from coverage in any insurance policy. Section 7.14 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement is
intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-
partners or a joint venture between the Public Entity, the State Entity, or the Commissioner of MMB, nor shall the Public Entity be considered or deemed to be an agent, representative, or employee of the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota in the performance of this Agreement, the Project, or operation of the Real Property and, if applicable,
Facility.
The Public Entity represents that it has already or will secure or cause to be secured all personnel required for the performance of this Agreement and the Project, and the operation and maintenance of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility. All personnel of the Public Entity
or other persons while engaging in the performance of this Agreement, the Project, or the operation
and maintenance of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility shall not have any contractual relationship with the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota, and shall not be considered employees of any of such entities. In addition, all claims that may arise on behalf of said personnel or other persons out of employment or alleged employment including, but
not limited to, claims under the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota, claims of
discrimination against the Public Entity, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota. Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the State Entity, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of
Minnesota including, but not limited to, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation
leave, disability benefits, severance pay and retirement benefits. Section 7.15 Notices. In addition to any notice required under applicable law to be given in another manner, any notices required hereunder must be in writing and shall be sufficient if
personally served or sent by prepaid, registered, or certified mail (return receipt requested), to the
business address of the party to whom it is directed. Such business address shall be that address specified below or such different address as may hereafter be specified, by either party by written notice to the other:
37 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
To the Public Entity at:
City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina , MN 55424 Attention: Matthew Gabb, Sustainability Specialist mgabb@edinamn.gov
mgabb@edinamn.gov 952-826-1611
To the State Entity at: MN Department of Natural Resources, Forestry Division
500 Lafayette Road
St Paul , MN 55155 Attention: Valerie McClannahan, Urban and Community Forestry Coordinator valerie.mcclannahan@state.mn.us 651-259-5283
To the Commissioner of MMB at:
Minnesota Department of Management and Budget 400 Centennial Office Bldg. 658 Cedar St.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Attention: Commissioner Section 7.16 Binding Effect and Assignment or Modification. This Agreement and the Declaration shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Public Entity and the State Entity,
and their respective successors and assigns. Provided, however, that neither the Public Entity nor
the State Entity may assign any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement or the Declaration without the prior written consent of the other party. No change or modification of the terms or provisions of this Agreement or the Declaration shall be binding on either the Public Entity or the State Entity unless such change or modification is in writing and signed by an authorized official
of the party against which such change or modification is to be imposed.
Section 7.17 Waiver. Neither the failure by the Public Entity, the State Entity, or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, in any one or more instances to insist upon the complete and total observance or performance of any term or provision
hereof, nor the failure of the Public Entity, the State Entity, or the Commissioner of MMB, as a
third party beneficiary of this Agreement, to exercise any right, privilege, or remedy conferred hereunder or afforded by law shall be construed as waiving any breach of such term, provision, or the right to exercise such right, privilege, or remedy thereafter. In addition, no delay on the part of the Public Entity, the State Entity, or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary
of this Agreement, in exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof,
nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right or remedy preclude other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or remedy.
38 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 7.18 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, the Declaration, and the documents, if any, referred to and incorporated herein by reference embody the entire agreement between the
Public Entity and the State Entity, and there are no other agreements, either oral or written, between
the Public Entity and the State Entity on the subject matter hereof. Section 7.19 Choice of Law and Venue. All matters relating to the validity, construction, performance, or enforcement of this Agreement or the Declaration shall be determined in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. All legal actions initiated with respect to or
arising from any provision contained in this Agreement shall be initiated, filed and venued in the State of Minnesota District Court located in the City of St. Paul, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota.
Section 7.20 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is finally judged by any
court to be invalid, then the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect and they shall be interpreted, performed, and enforced as if the invalid provision did not appear herein. Section 7.21 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to all of the matters
contained in this Agreement.
Section 7.22 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.
Section 7.24 Source and Use of Funds. The Public Entity represents to the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB that Attachment III is intended to be and is a source and use of funds statement showing the total cost of the Project and all of the funds that are available for the completion of the Project, and that the information contained in such Attachment III correctly
and accurately delineates the following information.
A. The total cost of the Project detailing all of the major elements that make up such total cost and how much of such total cost is attributed to each such major element.
B. The source of all funds needed to complete the Project broken down among the
following categories: (i) State funds including the Program Grant, identifying the source and amount of such funds.
(ii) Matching funds, identifying the source and amount of such funds.
(iii) Other funds supplied by the Public Entity, identifying the source and amount of such funds. (iv) Loans, identifying each such loan, the entity providing the loan, the amount of each such loan, the terms and conditions of each such loan, and all
collateral pledged for repayment of each such loan.
(v) Other funds, identifying the source and amount of such funds.
39 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
C. Such other financial information that is needed to correctly reflect the total funds available for the completion of the Project, the source of such funds and the expected use of
such funds.
Previously paid project expenses that are to be reimbursed and paid from proceeds of the G.O. Grant may only be included as a source of funds and included in Attachment III if such items have been approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB.
If any of the funds included under the source of funds have conditions precedent to the release of such funds, then the Public Entity must provide to the State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB a detailed description of such conditions and what is being done to satisfy such conditions.
The Public Entity shall also supply whatever other information and documentation that the
State Entity or the Commissioner of MMB may request to support or explain any of the information contained in Attachment III. The value of the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and, if applicable,
Facility should only be shown in Attachment III if such ownership interest is being acquired and
paid for with funds shown in such Attachment III, and for all other circumstances such value should be shown in the definition for Ownership Value in Section 1.01 and not included in such Attachment III.
The funds shown in Attachment III and to be supplied for the Project may, subject to any
limitations contained in the State Program Enabling Legislation, be provided by either the Public Entity or a Counterparty under a Use Contract. Section 7.25 Project Completion Schedule. The Public Entity represents to the State
Entity and the Commissioner of MMB that Attachment IV correctly and accurately delineates the
projected schedule for the completion of the Project. Section 7.26 Third-Party Beneficiary. The State Program will benefit the State of Minnesota and the provisions and requirements contained herein are for the benefit of both the
State Entity and the State of Minnesota. Therefore, the State of Minnesota, by and through its
Commissioner of MMB, is and shall be a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement. Section 7.27 Public Entity Tasks. Any tasks that this Agreement imposes upon the Public Entity may be performed by such other entity as the Public Entity may select or designate,
provided that the failure of such other entity to perform said tasks shall be deemed to be a failure
to perform by the Public Entity. Section 7.28 State Entity and Commissioner Required Acts and Approvals. The State Entity and the Commissioner of MMB shall not (i) perform any act herein required or authorized
by it in an unreasonable manner, (ii) unreasonably refuse to perform any act that it is required to
perform hereunder, or (iii) unreasonably refuse to provide or withhold any approval that is required of it herein.
40 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Section 7.29 Applicability to Real Property and Facility. This Agreement applies to the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property and if a Facility exists to the Facility.
The term “if applicable” appearing in conjunction with the term “Facility” is meant to indicate that
this Agreement will apply to a Facility if one exists, and if no Facility exists then this Agreement will only apply to the Public Entity’s ownership interest in the Real Property. Section7.30 E-Verification. The Public Entity agrees and acknowledges that it is aware
of Minn. Stat. § 16C.075 regarding e-verification of employment of all newly hired employees to
confirm that such employees are legally entitled to work in the United States, and that it will, if and when applicable, fully comply with such statute and impose a similar requirement in any Use Contract to which it is a party.
Section 7.31 Additional Requirements. The Public Entity and the State Entity agree to
comply with the following additional requirements. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the following additional requirements and any other provisions or requirement contained in this Agreement, the following additional requirements contained in this Section shall control.
Grant Project Deliverables
2023 Shade Tree Program Bonding Grants
City of Edina Deliverables
Grant Sum Total: $480,000.00 Grant Parameters
• Planting trees can take place without removal.
• Removals need to be considered a necessary component of replanting.
• Removals conducted on streets and manicured parks must meet a minimum of one tree planted
for each tree removed.
• Removals conducted in park woodlands must incorporate replanting at a meaningful rate.
o Removals in woodlands need to be mitigating a public safety concern or to address
degraded ecosystems.
o Removals must meet a minimum of one tree planted for five trees removed.
Accomplishment Reports
As work is completed, thoroughly address all applicable bullet points below. Add in the
date of reporting (e.g. 1/1/24) and change the font color of your update to red, to show
where information has been added. Continually add to this document over the lifetime of
your grant, making sure that all bullet points are addressed by the time of the grant’s completion.
41 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
A written update must be submitted by each reporting deadline, to ensure project is moving forward and on track to completion. Add written reports below corresponding to
each reporting date: July 1, 2024 Update: January 1, 2025 Update: July 1, 2025 Update: January 1, 2026 Update:
July 1, 2026 Update: January 1, 2027 Update: July 1, 2027 Update: January 15, 2028 Final Report:
Work with DNR to fully execute and report on the impacts of the work plan by
meeting the requirements as submitted in the application: Anticipated Accomplishments: Trees Removed-300 Trees Planted-300 Project Overview and Need The City of Edina proposes to use Shade Tree bonding funds to replace hazardous ash
trees on public land with diverse and climate adaptive tree species at a two-to-one rate. In 2020 the City completed a grant-funded public lands tree inventory that identified 2000 ash trees in need of replacement due to emerald ash borer making them a public safety hazard. The City's NextGen Trees initiative used American Rescue Plan Act funds to plant 1000 trees at affordable housing properties and on public lands. With those one-
time funds nearly exhausted, a Shade Tree grant would allow the City to scale this successful initiative by removing hazardous ash trees and planting two-to-one replacements to achieve a robust and diverse canopy. Shade Tree funds would be Edina's largest-ever investment in ash removal and replacement. This project would allow Edina to build a roadmap to holistically address the issues of EAB and leverage state
funds to tap into increasing federal funds (such as USDA’s Urban & Community Forestry Program). The City views its tree canopy as a vital piece of public health and climate resilience infrastructure. Therefore, this project will prioritize environmental justice communities and areas with low tree cover to create a robust, equitable, and resilient urban tree canopy.
In 2021, Edina completed a Climate Vulnerability Assessment, which identified areas of Edina with residents most vulnerable to climate change and heatwave-induced deaths. Unsurprisingly, Edina's lowest-income neighborhoods suffer from low tree cover and a high proportion of ash trees in adjacent public land. Bonding funds, hopefully coupled with a more complete tree inventory conducted if Edina receives a ReLeaf Community
Forestry grant, are needed to address this injustice and move from reactive to proactive forestry management. Without bonding funds, NextGen Trees will be forced to sunset in 2024 and the City will have to continue a piecemeal, reactive approach to replacing hazardous ash trees.
42 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Project Timeline January 2024: top 10% of hazardous ash trees (200) to be replaced identified from 2020
inventory January-April 2024: 50 of top 10% of hazardous ash trees removed before EAB flight season May-October 2024: 100 replacement trees planted Winter 2024/2025: interim report, photo documentation, and maps submitted to DNR
January-April 2025: 50 more of top 10% of hazardous ash trees removed before EAB flight season May-October 2024: 100 more replacement trees planted Winter 2025/2026: interim report, photo documentation, and maps submitted to DNR
January-April 2026: 50 more of top 10% of hazardous ash trees removed before EAB flight season May-October 2026: 100 more replacement trees planted Winter 2026/2027: interim report, photo documentation, and maps submitted to DNR
January-October 2027: planted trees monitored December 2027: final report submitted to DNR Project Budget Explanation
The request of $480,000 is for 150 hazardous ash trees to be replaced with 300 diverse, climate-ready trees. Based on the City's NextGen Trees initiative, it costs an average of $2500 for contractor tree removal, $200 for site preparation, $100 for planting supplies, and $50 for the tree. This is $15,000 for tree purchasing; $30,000 for planting supplies (including water bags, compost, and tree guards); and $30,000 for site preparation, and
$375,000 for removals. Like the City's NextGen Trees program, trees will be selected for diversity, climate readiness, utility compatibility, and salt tolerance using Hennepin County and DNR's recommended tree lists. The removal would be done by arborist-certified contractors obtained under the City’s bid processes. Planting work would be done by staff in the City's Forestry Division, as well as the two Forestry Corps members
who serve at the City every summer. Planting work would also be supplemented by resident volunteers at community planting events, which were found to be a success for the NextGen Trees initiative. Should the City receive ReLeaf funding, species stock and selection would be informed by the citywide tree inventory conducted under that project. If not, stock and selection will
be informed by Edina's 2010 DNR survey. A proposed stock and species list based on the 2010 survey is attached to this application, but may be appealed should the updated inventory be conducted. Project Impacts on Priority Landscapes and Populations The Shade Tree Bonding Grants program is an opportunity to fundamentally shift Edina's
urban tree care to lead with a climate justice lens. MPCA's environmental justice map notes three census tracts in southeast Edina as areas of concern. All of these tracts have higher populations of low-income households and people of color. Two of those tracts are
43 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
also identified by the US Department of Energy as Disadvantaged Communities. This DOE designation is due to these tracts having a higher proportion of households who are "energy burdened" (meaning they spend more of their income on heating, cooling, and
other home energy costs than other households) and having larger elderly, disabled, and renter household populations than the national average. Not by coincidence, according to American Forests' Tree Equity Score, block groups in these three tracts have the largest tree canopy gap and surface heat disparity in Edina. This means they have an insufficient tree canopy (with one block group's being as low as 9%) and are up to 10
degrees hotter in the summer than the Twin Cities' regional average. Lowering surface temperatures through an expanded tree canopy is a proven way to reduce energy burdens and costs. We know from Edina's NextGen Trees initiative, which partners with affordable housing properties in Edina to plant trees and equip residents to care for them, that most of the trees near affordable housing are dead or dying ash trees. The Shade
Tree grant will build on the learnings and relationships from NextGen Trees to address ash tree removal and replacement in these EJ areas in collaboration with residents. As previously stated, this project will focus on two-to-one ash tree replacements. While the "first" tree in each replacement will be located close to the site of the removed ash tree (so could be anywhere in the city), the "second" tree will be planted in southeast Edina.
These 150+ trees will be a major step to closing the tree canopy gap and heat disparity in one of the poorest and densest parts of Edina. Communication Since this project's ash tree removals will be citywide but replantings will largely be focused on southeast Edina, multiple outreach methods will be needed using the
International Association of Public Participation’s spectrum of public participation. Educational flyers on EAB and why hundreds of ash trees need to be removed and replaced will be mailed citywide. This will be done either separately or in the monthly "Edition: Edina" newsletter sent to every household each month (and is always translated into both Spanish and Somali). Edina's communications department has found that
"Edition: Edina" is the City's most effective way to convey information to the public. Events such as community tree plantings (modeled on the successful ones held for NextGen Trees) would be held to both educate the community on EAB and tree replacement efforts, as well as give Edina residents a sense of ownership of our tree canopy's protection and expansion. Residents who join tree planting events would be given training
by the City's certified arborist staff so they can assist in properly watering and maintaining new trees over the next three years. For projects specifically in the environmental justice areas of southeast Edina, the Urban Forester (as well as the new Urban Forestry Coordinator, should the ReLeaf application be successful) would partner with community organizations. These would include
partners such as Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County and the Sustainable Resources Center, who both work with energy-burdened residents in Edina on energy bill and home weatherization assistance, respectively. Since tree planting will directly assist residents who use these programs, partnerships with CAP and SRC would ensure the residents who stand to benefit the most will be involved in aspects of projects such as
tree planting and maintenance.
44 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Key Personnel Luther Overholt (City Forester). BS in Forestry Conservation Management, University of
Minnesota. International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist, Licensed Minnesota Tree Inspector, Licensed Minnesota Pesticide Applicator. • Will leverage existing relationships with low-income residents in affordable housing complexes and neighborhood organizations to assist with outreach
• Will oversee and assist tree removals and plantings Laura Beres (Assistant City Forester). BA in Biology & Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Superior. Licensed Minnesota Tree Inspector and will acquire ISA Arborist Certification in October 2023.
• Will assist tree removals and plantings Matthew Gabb (Sustainability Specialist). BA in Anthropology, University of Maryland. Master of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Minnesota. Certificate in Graphic Design, California Institute of the Arts.
• Will manage Shade Tree grant administrative tasks, including reimbursement and report submissions Grace Hancock (Sustainability Manager). Bachelor in Business Administration, University of Oklahoma. Master of Environmental Policy, Duke University. Master’s Thesis: Planning
an Equitable Tree Canopy for Durham, NC. • Will ensure program alignment with Edina Climate Action Plan • Will liaise with City Council to provide program updates • Will communicate grant impact to Edina community and across Minnesota via MN GreenStep Cities
MJ Lamon (Community Engagement Manager). BA in Criminology, Hamline University. Certified Public Participation Practitioner, International Association for Public Participation. • Will assist in identifying community engagement opportunities and establishing
relationships with neighborhood organizations and other partners in Edina TBD Contractor. Obtained through City’s bid/procurement process. Will be required to have ISA-certified arborists on staff and working on the project. • Will remove Edina’s 150 most hazardous ash trees.
45 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Tree Planting Grant funds will not fund the purchase of trees that are over-represented in your
community. Any genera that comprise 10% or more of the community forest make-up will
not be funded. Numbers derived from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2010 Rapid Assessment will be used unless an updated inventory is provided. For this community it means grant funds cannot be spent on purchasing:
• Picea (spruce): 22.1%
• Acer (maple): 16.9%
• Fraxiunus (ash): 12.3%
All trees planted with grant funds are expected to be maintained based on the grantee
submitted Three Year Maintenance Plan and attached to contract. Trees that do not survive will need to be replaced prior to grant close-out utilizing the warranty the city has with the nursery that stock was purchased from, or at the expense of the grantee. Trees must be planted in accordance with the standards set in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Pocket Guide to Planting Trees. Reporting and Preparing for Reimbursement Accomplishment reports, maps, and declarations and/or certifications of completed work will need to be submitted in order to make an official request for reimbursement. You may wait until the end of your project to submit an official request for reimbursement; however, you will be required to submit the following annually on reporting deadlines as listed above
under “Accomplishment Reports” to ensure that you are on track for completing grant accomplishments and securing necessary documentation.
• Partial payment form along with invoices and proof of payment for grant-funded
purchases, Cash Match form along with proof of payment, and In-Kind Match form
• Accomplishment Reports will include grant contract deliverables and their impacts (required biannually, see dates above)
• Photo documentation of the project’s progress at appropriate phases, and illustrations,
diagrams, charts, graphs, and maps to show results
• Maps will: o Identify the location of ash that have been removed o Identify the location of ash stumps that have been ground
o Identify the location and species of trees that have been planted
• All trees removed, and planted will be mapped and submitted as shapefiles, with the planted trees identified by species, to obtain grand fund reimbursement. If your community does not have access to shapefile-generating software, please notify your DNR Urban and Community Forestry Team Member, and they will work to assist you.
Following the submission of invoices and accomplishment reports, a compliance check will be conducted by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources staff. Staff will do a site evaluation ensuring that tree species submitted on maps are correctly identified and planted in accordance with the standards set in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Pocket Guide to Planting Trees.
Staff will also ensure that the project adheres to the 20-10-5 guideline which means that
following planting, a community has no more than 20% of their trees within a single family, no more than 10% of their trees within a single genus, and no more than 5% of their trees
46 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
within a single species. Staff will confirm that planted tree stock is ¾ - 2 inch caliper bareroot or a container class size #20 or smaller. To Obtain Reimbursement
All documentation within the above section “Preparing for Reimbursement” will be required to obtain reimbursement. Additionally, you will be required to submit all relevant certifications and/or declarations. Certifications and Declarations This grant requires a declaration be recorded against real estate that is purchased or
improved with state general obligation bond proceeds. When trees are planted in parks or public-owned properties, a General Obligation Bond Financed Property Declaration must be recorded on the legal description with the County Recorder. The recorded declaration proclaims a property as “Restricted Property,” which prevents these properties from being sold, mortgaged, encumbered, or otherwise disposed of without the
approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget for 125% of the useful life of the Restricted Property. The useful life for this grant is 30 years, meaning 125% of that is 37.5 years. If the grant project involves more than one park or public-owned property, one declaration can be recorded with multiple legal descriptions (this means you only
pay one filing fee). Consider recording the declaration after all trees have been planted in parks or on public-owned properties, instead of beforehand, since removing a declaration from a legal description requires a written release from the commissioners of Management and Budget and Department of Natural Resources. For projects or portions of projects that lie within roads, highways or utility or transit
corridors, easements or rights-of-way, a waiver appeal can be requested. If approved, the grantee will require a certification in which the grantee acknowledges that the property purchased and/or improved is still state bond financed property and thus subject to certain statutory requirements will suffice in lieu of a declaration. Certifications and declarations must be submitted before requesting reimbursement from
DNR. Please see Attachments 1A, 1B, and 2A. For more information and templates. Acknowledgment The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources needs to be acknowledged in publications, audiovisuals, and electronic media developed as a result of this award.
• Including any publications or outreach materials related to this grant or agreement, a statement of affiliation with Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, e.g., “This publication made possible through a grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.” OR “This project was conducted in cooperation with the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources.”
• Logo is permitted for use and can be obtained by contacting an Urban and Community Forestry Team Member.
47 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the Public Entity and the State Entity have executed this General Obligation Bond Proceeds Grant Agreement Construction Grant for the City of Edina
Shade Tree Project under the MN Natural Resources Shade Tree on the day and date indicated
immediately below their respective signatures. PUBLIC ENTITY: City of Edina ,
a Statutory City - Plan B
By:
Its: Dated: _______________________
And:
Its:
Dated: ______________________
And:
Its:
Dated: _______________________ STATE ENTITY: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division
of Forestry,
By:
Its: Dated: _______________________
48 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Scott Neal, City Manager
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Attachment I to Grant Agreement
State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Financed DECLARATION The undersigned has the following interest in the real property located in the County of
____________, State of Minnesota that is legally described in Exhibit A attached and all facilities
situated thereon (collectively, the “Restricted Property”): (Check the appropriate box.)
a fee simple title,
a lease, or
an easement,
and as owner of such fee title, lease or easement, does hereby declare that such interest in the Restricted Property is hereby made subject to the following restrictions and encumbrances:
A. The Restricted Property is bond financed property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 16A.695, is subject to the encumbrance created and requirements imposed by such statute, and cannot be sold, mortgaged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of without the approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget, which
approval must be evidenced by a written statement signed by said commissioner and
attached to the deed, mortgage, encumbrance or instrument used to sell or otherwise dispose of the Restricted Property; and B. The Restricted Property is subject to all of the terms, conditions, provisions, and
limitations contained in that certain [Insert title of the general obligation grant
agreement]_ between _______________ and ______________, dated _________, ____. The Restricted Property shall remain subject to this State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond
Financed Declaration for 125% of the useful life of the Restricted Property or until the Restricted
Property is sold with the written approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget, at which time it shall be released therefrom by way of a written release in recordable form signed by both the Commissioner of [Insert the name of the State Entity that provided the grant] and the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget, and such written release is recorded
in the real estate records relating to the Restricted Property. This Declaration may not be
terminated, amended, or in any way modified without the specific written consent of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget. (SIGNATURE BLOCK, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, AND STATEMENT AS TO WHOM IT
WAS DRAFTED BY.)
49 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Exhibit A to Declaration LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED PROPERTY
50 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Attachment II to Grant Agreement LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY
To be determined once Real Property is finalized by Public Entity with the Declaration (Attachment 1)
51 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Grant Agreement – City of Edina
Generic GO Bond Proceeds 1Ver – 10/26/20
Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Attachment III to Grant Agreement
SOURCE AND USE OF FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT
Source of Funds Use of Funds
Identify Source of Funds Amount Identify Items Amount
State G.O. Funds Ownership Acquisition
Program Grant $480,000.00
and Other Items Paid for
with Program Grant Funds
Other State Funds Purchase of Ownership $__________
____________ $__________ Interest
____________ $__________ Other Items of a Capital
____________ $__________ Nature
Subtotal $__________ Tree Removal and
Planting
$480,000.00
____________ $__________
Matching Funds ____________ $__________
____________ $__________ Subtotal $__________
____________ $__________
Subtotal $__________ Items Paid for with
Non- Program Grant Funds
Other Public Entity Funds ____________ $__________
____________ $__________ ____________ $__________
____________ $__________ ____________ $__________
Subtotal Subtotal $__________
Loans
____________ $__________
Subtotal $__________
Other Funds
____________ $__________
Subtotal $__________ -
Prepaid Project Expenses
____________ $__________
____________ $__________
Subtotal $__________
TOTAL FUNDS $480,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $480,000.00
52 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Generic GO Bond Proceeds Contract # 242257 / PO # 3-248226
Ver – 10/26/20 Grant Agreement for Program Construction Grants
Attachment IV to Grant Agreement PROJECT COMPLETION SCHEDULE Not Applicable
53 of 59
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Page 1 of 4
Attachment V
Shade Tree Program Bonding Grants
2023 Application
Please refer to the Request for Applications (RFA) when completing this application.
Submit this form, along with required attachments, to ucf.dnr@state.mn.us by October 2, 2023.
Checklist:
Application Form (filled out, guided by the RFA)
Budget Form (Attachment A)
3‐Year Tree Maintenance Plan (Attachment B)
Species Selection and Stock List (follow guidelines in RFA)
Local Unit of Government (LUG)
Project Coordinator
Coordinator Title
Address
City, State, Zip
County
Coordinator Email
Coordinator Phone Number
Grant Amount Requested
Cash Match (refer to RFA for match guidance)
In‐Kind Match
Total Match (combined In‐Kind and Cash Match)
Yes No Don’t KnowHave you received a DNR community forestry grant in the past?
Is this application limited to serving a community, or
communities, with populations less than 20,000?
(To encourage applications from smaller communities across
Minnesota, points will be awarded to grants that serve
communities with populations less than 20,000)
Yes No
54 of 59
4
4
4
4
City of Edina
Matthew Gabb
Sustainability Specialist
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
Hennepin
mgabb@edinamn.gov
952-826-1611
$480,000
0
0
$480,000
4
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Page 2 of 4
Project Overview and Need (25 points; 2,050 character maximum including spaces) Provide a summary of the
project, why this funding is needed, what project work will not happen without these grant funds, and expected
outcomes. This should include a description of the project location (community wide project, specific parks, etc.). A
successful application will demonstrate a readiness to take on a project of the proposed scope and size, and will benefit
environmental justice priority populations, and focus on significant public safety concerns.
Project Timeline (15 points; 2,600 character maximum including spaces) Describe the approximate project
schedule showing intermediate steps and milestones. A successful timeline will provide specific dates, is easy to
comprehend, and will follow best management practices
55 of 59
The City of Edina proposes to use Shade Tree bonding funds to replace hazardous ash trees on
public land with diverse and climate adaptive tree species at a two-to-one rate. In 2020 the City
completed a grant-funded public lands tree inventory that identified 2000 ash trees in need of
replacement due to emerald ash borer making them a public safety hazard. The City's NextGen
Trees initiative used American Rescue Plan Act funds to plant 1000 trees at affordable housing
properties and on public lands. With those one-time funds nearly exhausted, a Shade Tree grant
would allow the City to scale this successful initiative by removing hazardous ash trees and planting
two-to-one replacements to achieve a robust and diverse canopy. Shade Tree funds would be
Edina's largest-ever investment in ash removal and replacement. This project would allow Edina to
build a roadmap to holistically address the issues of EAB and leverage state funds to tap into
increasing federal funds (such as USDA’s Urban & Community Forestry Program).
The City views its tree canopy as a vital piece of public health and climate resilience infrastructure.
Therefore, this project will prioritize environmental justice communities and areas with low tree cover
to create a robust, equitable, and resilient urban tree canopy. In 2021, Edina completed a Climate
Vulnerability Assessment, which identified areas of Edina with residents most vulnerable to climate
change and heatwave-induced deaths. Unsurprisingly, Edina's lowest-income neighborhoods suffer
from low tree cover and a high proportion of ash trees in adjacent public land. Bonding funds,
hopefully coupled with a more complete tree inventory conducted if Edina receives a ReLeaf
Community Forestry grant, are needed to address this injustice and move from reactive to proactive
forestry management. Without bonding funds, NextGen Trees will be forced to sunset in 2024 and
the City will have to continue a piecemeal, reactive approach to replacing hazardous ash trees.
January 2024: top 10% of hazardous ash trees (200) to be replaced identified from 2020 inventory
January-April 2024: 50 of top 10% of hazardous ash trees removed before EAB flight season
May-October 2024: 100 replacement trees planted
Winter 2024/2025: interim report, photo documentation, and maps submitted to DNR
January-April 2025: 50 more of top 10% of hazardous ash trees removed before EAB flight season
May-October 2024: 100 more replacement trees planted
Winter 2025/2026: interim report, photo documentation, and maps submitted to DNR
January-April 2026: 50 more of top 10% of hazardous ash trees removed before EAB flight season
May-October 2026: 100 more replacement trees planted
Winter 2026/2027: interim report, photo documentation, and maps submitted to DNR
January-October 2027: planted trees monitored
December 2027: final report submitted to DNR
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Page 3 of 4
Project Budget Explanation (20 points; 2,200 character maximum including spaces)
Provide additional remarks to clarify the budget request. If applicable, provide an explanation of how you are funding
portions of your project that are not eligible with grant dollars. A successful budget will provide specific dollar amounts
for anticipated use, will be financially realistic and cost effective. Budget will be correctly calculated.
Project Impacts on Priority Populations (20 points; 2,200 character maximum including spaces)
This grant opportunity aligns with state initiatives to reduce disparities in health and environmental quality for diverse
populations. A successful proposal will serve and include areas of concern for environmental justice (communities with
higher populations of low‐income residents and/or people of color, including tribal communities), and the applicant will
describe actionable items for these communities.
56 of 59
The request of $480,000 is for 150 hazardous ash trees to be replaced with 300 diverse,
climate-ready trees. Based on the City's NextGen Trees initiative, it costs an average of $2500 for
contractor tree removal, $200 for site preparation, $100 for planting supplies, and $50 for the tree.
This is $15,000 for tree purchasing; $30,000 for planting supplies (including water bags, compost,
and tree guards); and $30,000 for site preparation, and $375,000 for removals. Like the City's
NextGen Trees program, trees will be selected for diversity, climate readiness, utility compatibility,
and salt tolerance using Hennepin County and DNR's recommended tree lists. The removal would
be done by arborist-certified contractors obtained under the City’s bid processes. Planting work
would be done by staff in the City's Forestry Division, as well as the two Forestry Corps members
who serve at the City every summer. Planting work would also be supplemented by resident
volunteers at community planting events, which were found to be a success for the NextGen Trees
initiative.
Should the City receive ReLeaf funding, species stock and selection would be informed by the
citywide tree inventory conducted under that project. If not, stock and selection will be informed by
Edina's 2010 DNR survey. A proposed stock and species list based on the 2010 survey is attached
to this application, but may be appealed should the updated inventory be conducted.
The Shade Tree Bonding Grants program is an opportunity to fundamentally shift Edina's urban tree
care to lead with a climate justice lens. MPCA's environmental justice map notes three census tracts
in southeast Edina as areas of concern. All of these tracts have higher populations of low-income
households and people of color. Two of those tracts are also identified by the US Department of
Energy as Disadvantaged Communities. This DOE designation is due to these tracts having a
higher proportion of households who are "energy burdened" (meaning they spend more of their
income on heating, cooling, and other home energy costs than other households) and having larger
elderly, disabled, and renter household populations than the national average. Not by coincidence,
according to American Forests' Tree Equity Score, block groups in these three tracts have the
largest tree canopy gap and surface heat disparity in Edina. This means they have an insufficient
tree canopy (with one block group's being as low as 9%) and are up to 10 degrees hotter in the
summer than the Twin Cities' regional average. Lowering surface temperatures through an
expanded tree canopy is a proven way to reduce energy burdens and costs. We know from Edina's
NextGen Trees initiative, which partners with affordable housing properties in Edina to plant trees
and equip residents to care for them, that most of the trees near affordable housing are dead or
dying ash trees. The Shade Tree grant will build on the learnings and relationships from NextGen
Trees to address ash tree removal and replacement in these EJ areas in collaboration with
residents. As previously stated, this project will focus on two-to-one ash tree replacements. While
the "first" tree in each replacement will be located close to the site of the removed ash tree (so could
be anywhere in the city), the "second" tree will be planted in southeast Edina. These 150+ trees will
be a major step to closing the tree canopy gap and heat disparity in one of the poorest and densest
parts of Edina.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Page 4 of 4
Communication (10 points; 2,200 character maximum including spaces) Describe the methods you will use to
conduct outreach to citizens about this grant project. A successful communication strategy will use multiple formats
that have the potential to reach the public about the use of grant funds and community forest practices.
Key Personnel (10 points; 2,200 character maximum including spaces) Please list all certifications and education
degrees for staff or contractors involved in the project. Describe the duties internal staff will conduct, and any work that
will be contracted out, or the partnerships you will leverage to complete tasks. Include key personnel and their past
experience with similar tasks. If you expect to contract work out, describe requirements you will have for contractors.
57 of 59
Since this project's ash tree removals will be citywide but replantings will largely be focused on
southeast Edina, multiple outreach methods will be needed using the International Association of
Public Participation’s spectrum of public participation. Educational flyers on EAB and why hundreds
of ash trees need to be removed and replaced will be mailed citywide. This will be done either
separately or in the monthly "Edition: Edina" newsletter sent to every household each month (and is
always translated into both Spanish and Somali). Edina's communications department has found
that "Edition: Edina" is the City's most effective way to convey information to the public. Events such
as community tree plantings (modeled on the successful ones held for NextGen Trees) would be
held to both educate the community on EAB and tree replacement efforts, as well as give Edina
residents a sense of ownership of our tree canopy's protection and expansion. Residents who join
tree planting events would be given training by the City's certified arborist staff so they can assist in
properly watering and maintaining new trees over the next three years.
For projects specifically in the environmental justice areas of southeast Edina, the Urban Forester
(as well as the new Urban Forestry Coordinator, should the ReLeaf application be successful) would
partner with community organizations. These would include partners such as Community Action
Partnership of Hennepin County and the Sustainable Resources Center, who both work with
energy-burdened residents in Edina on energy bill and home weatherization assistance,
respectively. Since tree planting will directly assist residents who use these programs, partnerships
with CAP and SRC would ensure the residents who stand to benefit the most will be involved in
aspects of projects such as tree planting and maintenance.
Luther Overholt (City Forester). BS in Forestry Conservation Management, University of Minnesota.
International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist, Licensed Minnesota Tree Inspector,
Licensed Minnesota Pesticide Applicator.
• Will leverage existing relationships with low-income residents in affordable housing complexes and
neighborhood organizations to assist with outreach
• Will oversee and assist tree removals and plantings
Laura Beres (Assistant City Forester). BA in Biology & Environmental Science, University of
Wisconsin-Superior. Licensed Minnesota Tree Inspector and will acquire ISA Arborist Certification in
October 2023.
• Will assist tree removals and plantings
Matthew Gabb (Sustainability Specialist). BA in Anthropology, University of Maryland. Master of
Urban & Regional Planning, University of Minnesota. Certificate in Graphic Design, California
Institute of the Arts.
• Will manage Shade Tree grant administrative tasks, including reimbursement and report
submissions
Grace Hancock (Sustainability Manager). Bachelor in Business Administration, University of
Oklahoma. Master of Environmental Policy, Duke University. Master’s Thesis: Planning an Equitable
Tree Canopy for Durham, NC.
• Will ensure program alignment with Edina Climate Action Plan
• Will liaise with City Council to provide program updates
• Will communicate grant impact to Edina community and across Minnesota via MN GreenStep
Cities
MJ Lamon (Community Engagement Manager). BA in Criminology, Hamline University. Certified
Public Participation Practitioner, International Association for Public Participation.
• Will assist in identifying community engagement opportunities and establishing relationships with
neighborhood organizations and other partners in Edina
TBD Contractor. Obtained through City’s bid/procurement process. Will be required to have
ISA-certified arborists on staff and working on the project.
• Will remove Edina’s 150 most hazardous ash trees.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Attachment VI
3-Year Tree Maintenance Plan Template for Newly Planted Trees
Year and Season of Planting:
Phone:
Size (caliper for deciduous, height for conifers): # of Trees to be Planted:
Type of Stock to be Planted (Bare root, etc.):
Describe how the activities below will be completed.
1.Tree Maintenance Personnel
a.Describe who is responsible for maintenance.
b.Volunteers, homeowners, or inexperienced staff that will provide maintenance should receive basic
training and literature on proper maintenance techniques. Is training needed and how will you do it?
c.How will you inspect tree maintenance work periodically to make sure it is being done correctly?
2.Tree Watering Process
Describe in detail how trees will be watered, the time period and frequency of watering. Trees should be
watered weekly for the first 3 to 5 years when the ground is thawed, unless it has rained 1 inch in a week.
Email:
Project Coordinator:
LUG:
58 of 59
2024-2027 spring/summer/fallCity of Edina
Matthew Gabb
952-826-1611 mgabb@edinamn.gov
1"-1.25" and 4'-5'300
10-gallon container
Luther Overholt (City Forester), Laura Beres (Assistant City Forester), to-be-hired Urban Forestry
Special Projects Coordinator (if ReLeaf Community Forestry application is successful)
Volunteers and homeowners will be invited to hands-on tree planting events where they will receive
training on tree maintenance and watering best practices. This training will be given by our certified City
Forester, as well as the Assistant City Forester who will be certified in October 2023.
As regulatory watering occurs, city staff will note any trees that are showing signs of concern and will
report back to forestry staff to be inspected and resolved.
Regulatory water efforts will be completed internal by City staff. Each tree planted will be provided with a
gator bag to be used to help facilitate watering for each tree. Trees are to be watered at least once a week
during optimal watering time for the first 3 years after inital planting. From then on the trees will be watered on
as needed basis.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
3.Mulching Trees
Will you mulch your trees and if so, how will you maintain mulch?
4.Staking and Tying Trees
Explain if staking is necessary due to mowing, vandalism, or wind conditions, and describe plans for
inspection and removal.
5.Checking Tree Health
The grantee will check trees every 6 – 12 months to identify and address problems. Describe inspection
process and follow-up.
6.Tree ProtectionYoung trees in busy urban areas may be easily damaged by human activity, animals, and equipment.
Describe how planted trees will be protected.
7.Pruning
Newly planted trees should need little pruning, if they were properly cared for in the nursery. In the first
year after planting, remove only dead or broken branches. In later years, weakly attached limbs can be
removed, and corrective pruning can be done if needed. Describe your pruning maintenance cycle.
8.Tree Warranty
Tree planting should include a warranty from the nursery for replacement (due to poor condition or
mortality). The grantee should be prepared to fully replace all trees that are in poor condition or die
prior to inspection at the end of the project grant agreement, unless loss was due to natural disaster.
Describe your tree warranty or how trees will be replaced.
59 of 59
Trees will be mulched at time of planting occurs. Maintenance of mulch will be done as needed around
the critical root zone of the trees.
Staking trees will be done at a needed basis and will only be done if necessary. Any tree that is
experiencing negative effects of staking will be address in a way to prevent any tree failure later on.
The City Forester, Assistant City Forester, and/or Forestry Corps members will inspect the trees every 6
months after planting.
Most trees to be planted will be provided with tree guard for the truck to protect against wildlife activity. If
required fencing can be placed to protected any trees with out tree guards or any tree that requires extra
protection.
During the first 1-3 years after planting the trees will be pruned as needed. Once the trees have matured
after the 3 years the trees will be pruned on a 2 year pruning cycle with exceptions for any hazards that
may come up.
In conjunction with the the tree health inspections, based on the findings during these inspections, trees
that are of poor condition will be put on a watchlist and the trees that have died will be replanted with a
new tree.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4ECA4B64-F4A0-4AAB-928B-70FD397024F7
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.I.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: ENG 24-5 50th Street and
Grange Road Improvements
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for ENG 24-5 50th Street and Grange Road Improvements with S.M. Hentges
& Sons, Inc for $2,694,183.
INTRODUCTION:
The HRA accepted the East Grandview Transportation Study associated with the redevelopment of 4917 Eden
Avenue (old P erkins site). That study identified improvements on Eden Avenue, Grange Road, and 50th Street to
improve safety of cyclist and pedestrians along with improving traffic safety and operations. This contract will
construct the improvements on 50th Street and Grange Road. T his project is the last improvement identified with
the East Grandview Transportation Study that is eligible for this specific TIF Funding.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request for Purchase: ENG 24-5 50th Street and Grange Road Improvements
ENG 24-5 Contract
Request for Purchase
Contract Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400082
Department: Engineering
Buyer: Chad Millner
Date: 03/11/2024
Requisition Description: 50th Street and Grange Road Improvements
Vendor: S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC.
Cost: $2,694,183.76
REPLACEMENT or NEW: REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE: QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID
DESCRIPTION:
The HRA accepted The East Grandview Transportation Study associated with the redevelopment of 4917
Eden Avenue (old Perkins site). That study identified improvements on Eden Avenue, Grange Road, and
50th Street to improve safety of cyclist and pedestrians along with improving traffic safety and operations.
This contract will construct the improvements along 50th Street from the proposed Tight Diamond
Interchange (TDI) to east of Dale Drive including Grange Road.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This project is funded by TIF funds collected from the Eden Grange TIF district created with the
redevelopment of 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site). This project is the last improvement
identified with the East Grandview Transportation Study that is eligible for this specific TIF
Funding.
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:
These projects can meet many of the seven guiding principles such as enhance the district’s economic viability, design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as
stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place, organize parking as an
effective resource for the district by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also
providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers, improve movement within and access to
the district for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development
reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
This project involves rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer, localized rehabilitation
and full reconstruction of watermain systems, reconstruction of concrete curb and gutter, construction of new
sidewalk, and complete reconstruction of bituminous pavement surfaces.
Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces
to reuse aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies
thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations.
1
1/2015 ENG 24-5
CONTRACT NO. ENG 24-5
THIS AGREEMENT made this 19th day of March, 2024, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (“City”), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (“HRA”), and S.M. Hentges and
Sons, Inc., 650 Quaker Avenue, Jordan, MN 55352 (“Contractor”). City and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual
covenants set forth herein, agree as follows:
1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,”
all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full
herein:
A. This Agreement.
B. Instructions to Bidders.
C. City of Edina General Contract Conditions.
D. Addenda number 1 & 2.
E. Specifications prepared by Chad A. Millner, P.E., dated January 26, 2024.
F. Plan sheets numbered 1 to 61.
G. Performance Bond.
H. Payment Bond.
I. Responsible Contractor Verification of Compliance
J. Contractor’s Bid dated March 8, 2024.
The Contract Documents are to be read and interpreted as a whole. The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all
items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work and to require Contractor to provide the highest quality
and greatest quantity consistent with the Contract Documents. If there are inconsistencies within or among part of the
Contract Documents or between the Contract Documents and applicable standards, codes or ordinances, the Contractor
shall provide the better quality or greater quantity of Work or comply with the more stringent requirements.
1.1 Before ordering any materials or doing any Work, the Contractor shall verify measurements at the Project
site and shall be responsible for the correctness of such measurements. No extra charges or compensation
will be allowed on account of differences between actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated on the
Drawings. Any difference that may be found shall be submitted to the City for resolution before proceeding
with the Work.
1.2 If a minor change in the Work is necessary due to actual field conditions, the Contractor shall submit detailed
drawings of such departure to the City for approval before making the change.
The City shall not be required to make any adjustment to either the Contract Sum or Contract Time because of any failure
by the Contractor to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. Actual or alleged conflicts or inconsistencies between
the Plans and Specifications or other Contract Documents shall be brought to the City’s attention in writing, prior to
performing the affected Work. The City’s directions shall be followed by the Contractor.
2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform
the work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
2
1/2015 ENG 24-5
3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The City agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept
payment in accordance with the Contractor’s bid $2,694,183.73.
4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES.
A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by City as
provided in the General Conditions.
B. Progress Payments; Retainage. City shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price
on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work.
C. Payments to Subcontractor.
(1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor
must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the
City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of
1½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not
paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid
balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor
shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor.
(2) Form IC-134 required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Edina
obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to
Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of
Revenue for approval.
The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the
requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid.
D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, City shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as
recommended by City.
5. COMPLETION DATE.
The Work must be completed and ready for final payment by October 11, 2024.
6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS.
A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in
the Contract Documents.
B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site
conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work.
C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may
affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work.
D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or
contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface
structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the
General Conditions; and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the
Site.
E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or
supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions
3
1/2015 ENG 24-5
(surface, subsurface, and underground facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost,
progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques,
sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means,
methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding
Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto.
F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or
data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and
in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents.
G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by City and others at the Site that relates
to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents.
H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from
visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations,
investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents.
I. Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor
has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to
Contractor.
J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and
conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work.
K. Subcontracts:
(1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the
executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the City the names of the subcontractors
proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the
consent of the City.
(2) The Contractor is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's
subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is
responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees.
(3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the
City and any subcontractor.
(4) The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents.
7. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the bid
shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any
and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and
upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and
damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications.
8. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third
parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of
reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims.
9. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions.
B. City and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the
other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants,
agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents.
4
1/2015 ENG 24-5
C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or
Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding
upon City and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such
stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to
expressing the intention of the stricken provisions.
D. Data Practices/Records.
(1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of
this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13,
any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as
federal regulations on data privacy.
(2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its
subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City.
E. Copyright/Patent. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or
patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall
hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. If the equipment provided by the
Contractor pursuant to this Agreement contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have
embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software
licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following
cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software
license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing
to use the software.
F. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Agreement
without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both
parties may agree to and set forth in writing.
G. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this
Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach
of this Agreement by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation.
H. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Agreement. In
the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for
Hennepin County.
I. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Agreement is found to be or becomes unenforceable
or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such
invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such
remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue
to operate as the parties’ entire agreement.
J. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete
and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s),
understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto.
K. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and
licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the
construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of-way and easements.
The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting
from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements.
5
1/2015 ENG 24-5
L. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the City, the
Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other
compensation.
M. Responsible Contractor. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City
that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance
with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3.
CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR
BY: ____________________________ BY: ____________________________
Its Mayor Its
AND ___________________________ AND ___________________________
Its City Manager Its
6
1/2015 ENG 24-5
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY: ____________________________
Its Chair
AND ___________________________
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.J.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: Braemar Park Courtney Fields
Site Improvements
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for Braemar Park Courtney Fields site improvements from Upper Midwest
Athletic Construction for $611,994.
INTRODUCTION:
The Courtney Fields ballfield complex is a well-used recreational facility within Braemar P ark. The adopted
Braemar Park master plan identified several updates, enhancements, and replacements of amenities park wide and
specifically for the athletic fields. Improvements for this purchase request include spectator sideline safety netting,
backstops and dugout safety screening, batting cages, and overhead safety netting. A prior phase of improvements
for this project replaced the existing lighting of fields 2 – 4. Additional phases will include further site amenities,
including pedestrian circulation and a new playground facility. The master plan improvements are funded by the
voter approved referendum implementation of a local option sales tax.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request for Purchase: Courtney Fields Site Improvements
Request for Purchase
Requisition Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400088
Department:Parks & Recreation
Buyer:Perry Vetter
Date: 03/12/2024
Requisition Description:Braemar Park: Courtney Fields Site Improvements
Vendor:UPPER MIDWEST ATHLETIC CONSTRUCTION
Cost:$611,994.00
REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE:COOP - NATIONAL, STATE,COUNTY COOP
DESCRIPTION:Renovations to Courtney Fields site improvements per park master plan
BUDGET IMPACT: Funding as part of Local Option Sales Tax for capital expense improvem
Environmental Impact - item specific:
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:Imprv as part of community driven master plan for youth athletic safet
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:NA
Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:NA
Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): NA
Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? NO - NO
Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: -
MPG:NA
Carbon Emissions:NA
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.K.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Pete Fisher, Assistant Fire Chief
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: Four 2024 Ford Lightning
Trucks
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve request for purchase of four 2024 Ford Lightning vehicles for $237,215 from Boyer Ford Trucks Inc.
INTRODUCTION:
As part of the Fire Equipment Replacement plan, the Fire Inspections vehicles are overdue for replacement. The
current vehicles were due for replacement in 2022 but have been delayed to 2024 due to acquisition and delays in
the manufacturer. Fire Inspection vehicles are utilized to perform life safety inspections in our community in
addition to emergency response and fire investigation. T he selection of the vehicles meets the City's sustainability
goals.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request for Purchase: Four Ford Lightning Trucks
Request for Purchase
Requisition Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400075
Department:Fire
Buyer:Pete Fisher
Date: 03/06/2024
Requisition Description:Fire Department Inspections Vehicles (4)
Vendor:BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC
Cost:$237,215.12
REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT
DESCRIPTION:Replacement vehicles for life safety inspections.
BUDGET IMPACT: Approved in CIP, previous council-approved order was canceled by Ford
Environmental Impact - item specific:
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:Used for life safety inspections of multi-family housing & businesse
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Fully Electric Vehicle
Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2024 Ford Supercrew Pro
Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): 1 2008 Tahoe,3 2011 Tahoes
Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES
Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: -
MPG:N/A
Carbon Emissions:
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.L.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Pete Fisher, Assistant Chief
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: 800MHz Motorola Mobile
Radios
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve request for purchase of 800MHz Motorola Mobile Radios for $132,439.36
INTRODUCTION:
Mobile radios are installed on every emergency response vehicle at the Fire Department. The current radios have
reached the end of their life and are due for replacement. Motorola radios will be purchased off of the State
Cooperative Purchasing Contract. Install of the radios will be brought in a separate council action. T he
replacement radios are budgeted within the Fire Equipment Replacement plan and this request is within budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Fire Department Mobile Radio replacement
Request for Purchase
Requisition Number
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12400089
Department:Fire
Buyer:Pete Fisher
Date: 03/14/2024
Requisition Description:Replacement Mobile 800MHz Radios
Vendor:ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
Cost:$132,439.36
REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT
PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT
DESCRIPTION:800MHz mobile radios for emergency response.
BUDGET IMPACT: CIP 2024
Environmental Impact - item specific:
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:Necessary for emergency response.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Powered by vehicle electrical system.
Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:N/A
Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): N/A
Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? -
Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: -
MPG:N/A
Carbon Emissions:N/A
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.M.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Andrew Slama, Fire Chief
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase: South Metro Public Safety
Training Facility Tactical Training Building Service
Contract
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve request for purchase for South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Tactical Training Building Service
Contract.
INTRODUCTION:
The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility (SMPST F) is completing a Tactical Training Building after the
State legislature authorized funding for the building. T he City of Edina is the fiscal agent for the SMPST F. The
architect working on the project is Ortel Architects. The SMP STF board supports the project proposal and
service contract due to the experience Ortel has at the Training Facility. Ortel has provided pre design and design
work for the Tactical Training Building as part of the State bonding process.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Tactical Training Building Service Contract
1
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861
Requisition Number
12400091
Department: Fire
Buyer: Andrew Slama
Date: 03/14/2024
Request for Purchase
Requisition Description: South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Tactical Training Building Service
Contract
Vendor: Ortel Architect
Cost: $110,900
REPLACEMENT or NEW: New
PURCHASE SOURCE: Service Contract
DESCRIPTION:
The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility (SMPSTF) is completing a Tactical Training Building after the
State legislature authorized funding for the building. The City of Edina is the fiscal agent for the
SMPSTF. The architect working on the project is Ortel Architects. The SMPSTF board supports the project
proposal and service contract due to the experience Ortel has at the Training Facility. Ortel has provided pre-
design and design work for the Tactical Training Building as part of the State bonding process.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The Tactical Training Building is being funded by the State Bonding process. To date, $2,000,000 has been
authorized for the design and construction of the training building. The scope of the service contract remains
in budget for the project.
2
COMMUNITY IMPACT:
This project will create a building that will allow increased levels of flexible training and scenario planning
for Law Enforcement. Additional capabilities and training space provide unique training opportunities for
existing Police Officers and new Police Officers attending initial Department training.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
As part of the State Bonding process, the building design must meet B3 requirements for the State of Minnesota.
The Architect will work with the State of MN B3 team to identify specific needs, requirements, and improvements
necessary to provide a fiscally and environmentally responsible building.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.N.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2024-26: Accepting Business District
Initiative Grant
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Resolution No. 2024-26 accepting Business District Initiative Grant.
INTRODUCTION:
The City applied for and received a $35,000 grant from Hennepin County as part of the 2023 Business District
Initiative program. This grant is intended to supplement funds from the City and Edina HRA to improve
customer wayfinding in the 50th and France commercial district. Planning will begin in Spring 2024 with
completion of the initial phases by year-end 2024.
Implementation of future phases are not yet funded.
Staff recommends that Resolution 2024-26 be approved.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution No. 2024-26: Accepting Business District Initiative Grant
BDI Grant Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-26
ACCEPTING BUSINESS DISTRICT INITIATIVE GRANT AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied for and received a $35,000 grant under
Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority’s Business District Initiative (BDI)
program to supplement local funds intended to improve customer wayfinding in the 50th & France
Commercial District; and
WHEREAS, said grant must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a
two thirds majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby
accepts Grant Contract No. PR00005745 and authorizes and directs the Mayor to sign the grant
agreement on its behalf.
Adopted this 19th day of March 2024.
Attest:_________________________ ______________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached
and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2024,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2024.
___________________________
City Clerk
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 1
Contract No: PR00005745
2023 BUSINESS DISTRICT INITIATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR CITY OF EDINA
This Agreement is between the HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the “AUTHORITY”), 701
Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 and CITY OF EDINA, or
affiliated entity including the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 4801 West 50th St,
Edina MN 55424-1394 (“CITY).
WHEREAS, Hennepin County created the Business District Initiative in 2015 (Resolution 15-
HCHRA-0006R1) to support small business districts in suburban Hennepin County
(“PROGRAM”); and
WHEREAS, following issuance of budgetary approval from the Hennepin County Board,
AUTHORITY authorized up to $200,000 for the PROGRAM in 2023; and
WHEREAS, CITY was selected by AUTHORITY via an open and competitive procurement
process conducted September 7, 2023 through October 5, 2023 to provide the services described
herein under the PROGRAM.
The parties agree as follows:
1. TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall commence on November 14, 2023, and expire on June 30, 2025,
unless cancelled or terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions herein.
The total cost of this Agreement, including all reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed
thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000).
2. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
The PROGRAM funds shall support CITY implementation of a wayfinding strategy for
improved pedestrian navigation in the 50th and France commercial district to improve
customer experience, benefit small businesses, and enhance the area's appeal (“Eligible
Activities”). The CITY is contributing a minimum of $20,000 for the wayfinding
project’s initial round of planning and implementation.
3. PAYMENT FOR ACTIVITIES
CITY shall complete the Eligible Activities to the satisfaction of AUTHORITY, in
accordance with the provisions herein, and in compliance with applicable law. If
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 2
AUTHORITY determines that CITY has not complied with the foregoing, AUTHORITY
shall not have any obligation to pay CITY for the non-complying activities.
Upon completion and approval of Task 1, AUTHORITY will reimburse CITY for work
conducted in Tasks 2 and 3, all as described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and
incorporated in this Agreement.
Reimbursable expenses are limited to the actual cost for items associated with Eligible
Activities, Tasks 2 and 3 described in Exhibit A. Payment for such Eligible Activities
shall be made directly to CITY after approved completion of the Eligible Activities and
upon the presentation of a claim as provided by law governing AUTHORITY’s payment
of claims and/or invoices. CITY shall submit monthly invoices for activities completed
on forms which may be furnished by AUTHORITY. Payment shall be made by the
AUTHORITY within thirty (30) days from receipt of the invoice from the CITY.
Payments shall be made pursuant to the provisions herein and AUTHORITY’s then
applicable payment policies, procedures, rules and directions. AUTHORITY is not
responsible for remedying fraudulent or unauthorized payments requested in CITY’s
name.
Unless expressly approved in writing by AUTHORITY, CITY shall not complete the
Eligible Activities under this Agreement without receiving a purchase order or purchase
order number supplied by AUTHORITY. All invoices from the CITY shall display a
Hennepin County purchase order number and be emailed to OBF.Internet@hennepin.us
and Ryan.Kelley@hennepin.us, or sent to the following central invoice receiving address:
PO Box 1388, Minneapolis, MN 55440.
AUTHORITY may withhold from any payment due to CITY any amount which is due
and owing AUTHORITY under this or any other agreement between the parties due to
overpayment or as a result of an audit.
4 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CITY shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services. Nothing is
intended nor should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of a
partnership or a joint venture between the parties or as constituting CITY as the agent,
representative, or employee of AUTHORITY for any purpose. CITY is and shall remain
an independent contractor for all services performed under this Agreement. CITY shall
secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this
Agreement. CITY’s personnel and/or subcontractors engaged to perform any work or
services required by this Agreement will have no contractual relationship with
AUTHORITY and will not be considered employees of AUTHORITY. AUTHORITY
shall not be responsible for any claims related to or on behalf of any of CITY’s
personnel, including without limitation, claims that arise out of employment or alleged
employment under the Minnesota Unemployment Insurance Law (Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 268) or the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act (Minnesota Statutes Chapter
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 3
176) or claims of discrimination arising out of applicable law, against CITY, its officers,
agents, contractors, or employees. Such personnel or other persons shall neither accrue
nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind from AUTHORITY,
including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation
leave, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, disability, severance pay,
and retirement benefits.
5. NON-DISCRIMINATION
A. In accordance with laws against discrimination, CITY shall not exclude any
person from full employment rights nor prohibit participation in or the benefits of
any program, service or activity on the grounds of any protected status or class,
including but not limited to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
gender expression, gender identity, age, disability, marital status, sexual
orientation, or public assistance status. No person who is protected by applicable
law against discrimination shall be subjected to discrimination.
B. AUTHORITY encourages CITY to develop and implement a policy promoting
diversity, equity, and inclusion in CITY’s workplace.
6. INDEMNIFICATION
CITY shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless AUTHORITY, its present and former
officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of
action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including attorney’s fees,
resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of CITY, a subcontractor, anyone
directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions
they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and
against all loss by reason of the failure of CITY to perform any obligation under this
Agreement. For clarification and not limitation, this obligation to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless includes but is not limited to any liability, claims or actions resulting
directly or indirectly from alleged infringement of any copyright or any property right of
another, the employment or alleged employment of CITY personnel, the unlawful
disclosure and/or use of protected data, or other noncompliance with the requirements of
these provisions.
7. INSURANCE
Each party warrants that it has a purchased insurance or a self-insurance program
sufficient to meet its liability obligations and, at a minimum, to meet the maximum
liability limits of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. This provision shall not be construed
as a waiver of any immunity from liability under Chapter 466 or any other applicable
law.
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 4
8. DUTY TO NOTIFY
CITY shall promptly notify AUTHORITY of any demand, claim, action, cause of action
or litigation brought against CITY, its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors,
which arises out of the services described in this Agreement. CITY shall also notify
AUTHORITY whenever CITY has a reasonable basis for believing that CITY and/or its
employees, officers, agents or subcontractors, and/or AUTHORITY, might become the
subject of a demand, claim, action, cause of action, administrative action, criminal arrest,
criminal charge or litigation arising out of and/or related to the services described in this
Agreement.
9. DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY
A. CITY, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and
subcontractors shall, to the extent applicable, abide by the provisions of the
Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, chapter 13
(MGDPA) and all other applicable law, rules, regulations and orders relating to
data or the privacy, confidentiality or security of data. For clarification and not
limitation, AUTHORITY hereby notifies CITY that the requirements of
Minnesota Statutes section 13.05, subd. 11, apply to this Agreement. CITY shall
promptly notify AUTHORITY if CITY becomes aware of any potential claims, or
facts giving rise to such claims, under the MGDPA or other data, data security,
privacy or confidentiality laws, and shall also comply with the other requirements
of this Section.
Classification of data, including trade secret data, will be determined pursuant to
applicable law and, accordingly, merely labeling data as “trade secret” by CITY
does not necessarily make the data protected as such under any applicable law.
B. In addition to the foregoing MGDPA and other applicable law obligations, CITY
shall comply with the following duties and obligations regarding County Data and
County Systems (as each term is defined herein). As used herein, “County Data”
means any data or information, and any copies thereof, created by CITY or
acquired by CITY from or through Hennepin County or AUTHORITY pursuant
to this Agreement, including but not limited to handwriting, typewriting, printing,
photocopying, photographing, facsimile transmitting, and every other means of
recording any form of communication or representation, including electronic
media, email, letters, works, pictures, drawings, sounds, videos, or symbols, or
combinations thereof.
If CITY has access to or possession/control of County Data, CITY shall safeguard
and protect the County Data in accordance with generally accepted industry
standards, all laws, and all then applicable policies, procedures, rules and
directions. To the extent of any inconsistency between accepted industry
standards and such policies, procedures, rules and directions, CITY shall notify
AUTHORITY of the inconsistency and follow AUTHORITY’s direction. CITY
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 5
shall immediately notify AUTHORITY of any known or suspected security
breach or unauthorized access to County Data, then comply with all responsive
directions provided by AUTHORITY. The foregoing shall not be construed as
eliminating, limiting or otherwise modifying CITY’s indemnification obligations
herein.
C. AUTHORITY may, in its sole discretion, grant CITY limited access to
AUTHORITY’S computer/data systems, including but not limited to Hennepin
County or AUTHORITY computers, networks, databases, applications and/or
environments owned by Hennepin County or AUTHORITY, (“County Systems”)
exclusively for the purposes of performing services hereunder. County Systems
may be owned by Hennepin County or AUTHORITY or may be licensed by
Hennepin County or AUTHORITY from a third party. If AUTHORITY grants
access to County Systems, CITY and all CITY personnel with access to County
Systems: (i) shall secure and safeguard all access and authentication information
related to County Systems, including but not limited to usernames, passwords,
and other applicable authentication information related to County Systems access,
(“Authentication Credentials”); (ii) shall not share or distribute Authentication
Credentials with any individual; and (iii) shall comply with then applicable
Hennepin County data practices and security policies, procedures, rules and
directions when accessing and using County Systems. Compliance with such
requirements is supplemental to CITY’s duty to comply with applicable law and
regulations and CITY’s ordinary duty of care in such situations.
For clarification and not limitation of the foregoing, CITY’s access to County
Systems shall be subject to the following: (i) CITY shall notify all personnel with
access to County Systems of the obligations imposed by this Agreement; (ii)
personnel performing on behalf of CITY shall complete data practices and
security training as required by AUTHORITY; (iii) if CITY utilizes its own
systems, software or equipment in the performance of this Agreement, the same
shall meet AUTHORITY’s technical operating and security system requirements,
including but not limited to installing and/or maintaining AUTHORITY or
Hennepin County approved firewalls, proxies, filters and other monitors and
controls; (iv) CITY shall immediately notify AUTHORITY of any known or
suspected County System incidents or breaches, then comply with all responsive
directions provided by AUTHORITY; and (v) if any CITY personnel with access
to County Systems no longer requires said access and/or is no longer performing
services hereunder, CITY shall immediately notify AUTHORITY and ensure that
said individual no longer has access to County Systems, including but not limited
to deleting, eliminating and destroying all Authentication Credentials.
AUTHORITY or Hennepin County may terminate, deny or revoke access to
County Systems at any time and without notice. Any notice required by the
foregoing shall be provided to AUTHORTY’S Contract Administrator (as
identified in the CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION provisions below).
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 6
D. Upon expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement:
(1) At the discretion of AUTHORITY and as specified in writing by the
Contract Administrator, CITY shall deliver to the Contract Administrator
all County Data so specified by AUTHORITY.
(2) AUTHORITY shall have full ownership and control of all such County
Data. If AUTHORITY permits CITY to retain copies of the County Data,
CITY shall not, without the prior written consent of AUTHORITY or
unless required by law, use any of the County Data for any purpose or in
any manner whatsoever; shall not assign, license, loan, sell, copyright,
patent and/or transfer any or all of such County Data; and shall not do
anything which in the opinion of AUTHORITY would affect COUNTY’s
or AUTHORITY’s ownership and/or control of such County Data.
(3) Except to the extent required by law or as agreed to by AUTHORITY,
CITY shall not retain any County Data that are confidential, protected,
privileged, not public, nonpublic, or private, as those classifications are
determined pursuant to applicable law. In addition, CITY shall, upon
AUTHORITY’S request, certify destruction of any County Data so
specified by AUTHORITY.
10. RECORDS – AVAILABILITY/ACCESS
Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subd. 5,
AUTHORITY, the State Auditor, or any of their authorized representatives, at any time
during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall
have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books,
documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and
procedures of CITY and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. CITY shall
maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six
(6) years after its expiration, cancellation or termination.
11. SUCCESSORS, SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS
A. CITY binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to
AUTHORITY for all covenants, agreements and obligations herein.
B. CITY shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be
performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become
due to it without the prior written consent of AUTHORITY. A consent to assign
shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as AUTHORITY may deem
necessary, accomplished by execution of a form prepared by AUTHORITY and
signed by CITY, the assignee and AUTHORITY. Permission to assign, however,
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 7
shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of its liabilities and obligations under
the Agreement.
C. CITY shall not subcontract this Agreement and/or the services to be performed,
whether in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of AUTHORITY.
Permission to subcontract, however, shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of
its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. Further, CITY shall be fully
responsible for the acts, omissions, and failure of its subcontractors in the
performance of the specified contractual services, and of person(s) directly or
indirectly employed by subcontractors. Contracts between CITY and each
subcontractor shall require that the subcontractor’s services be performed in
accordance with this Agreement. CITY shall make contracts between CITY and
subcontractors available upon request. For clarification and not limitation of the
provisions herein, none of the following constitutes assent by AUTHORITY to a
contract between CITY and a subcontractor, or a waiver or release by
AUTHORITY of CITY’s full compliance with the requirements of this Section:
(1) AUTHORITY’s request or lack of request for contracts between CITY and
subcontractors; (2) AUTHORITY’s review, extent of review or lack of review of
any such contracts; or (3) AUTHORITY’s statements or actions or omissions
regarding such contracts.
D. As required by Minnesota Statutes section 471.425, subd. 4a, CITY shall pay any
subcontractor within ten (10) days of CITY’s receipt of payment from
AUTHORITY for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor, and CITY
shall comply with all other provisions of that statute.
12. MERGER, MODIFICATION AND SEVERABILITY
A. The entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and supersedes all
oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject
matter. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and
made a part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this
Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall
prevail.
CITY and/or COUNTY or AUTHORITY are each bound by its own electronic
signature(s) on this Agreement, and each agrees and accepts the electronic
signature of the other party.
B. Any alterations, variations or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement
shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to
this Agreement signed by the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties
may agree to changes in the Scope of Services and Attachment A, by prior,
mutual, written agreement and without formal amendment to this Agreement. Any
such changes shall not operate to exceed the total cost of this Agreement set forth
in Section 1. Except as expressly provided, the substantive legal terms contained
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 8
in this Agreement, including but not limited to Indemnification, Insurance,
Merger, Modification and Severability, Default and Cancellation/Termination or
Minnesota Law Governs may not be altered, varied, modified or waived by any
change order, implementation plan, scope of work, development specification or
other development process or document.
C. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions will not be affected.
13. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION/TERMINATION
A. If CITY fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement, fails to
administer the work so as to endanger the performance of the Agreement or
otherwise breaches or fails to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement, it
shall be in default. Unless CITY’s default is excused in writing by
AUTHORITY, AUTHORITY may upon written notice immediately cancel or
terminate this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure to comply with the
terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for AUTHORITY to delay payment
until CITY’s compliance. In the event of a decision to withhold payment,
AUTHORITY shall furnish prior written notice to CITY.
B. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, CITY shall
remain liable to AUTHORITY for damages sustained by AUTHORITY by virtue
of any breach of this Agreement by CITY. Upon notice to CITY of the claimed
breach and the amount of the claimed damage, AUTHORITY may withhold any
payments to CITY for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount
of damages due AUTHORITY from CITY is determined. Following notice from
AUTHORITY of the claimed breach and damage, CITY and AUTHORITY shall
attempt to resolve the dispute in good faith.
C. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to
AUTHORITY under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity.
D. AUTHORITY’s failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to
exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or
waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not
constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the
Agreement.
E. This Agreement may be canceled/terminated with or without cause by
AUTHORITY upon thirty (30) days’ written notice.
F. If this Agreement expires or is cancelled or terminated, with or without cause, by
either party, at any time, CITY shall not be entitled to any payment, fees or other
monies except for payments duly invoiced for then-delivered and accepted
deliverables/milestones pursuant to this Agreement. In the event CITY has
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 9
performed work toward a deliverable that AUTHORITY has not accepted at the
time of expiration, cancellation or termination, CITY shall not be entitled to any
payment for said work, including but not limited to incurred costs of performance,
termination expenses, profit on the work performed, other costs founded on
termination for convenience theories or any other payments, fees, costs or
expenses not expressly set forth in this Agreement.
G. CITY has an affirmative obligation, upon written notice by AUTHORITY that
this Agreement may be suspended or cancelled/terminated, to follow reasonable
directions by AUTHORITY, or absent directions by AUTHORITY, to exercise a
fiduciary obligation to AUTHORITY, before incurring or making further costs,
expenses, obligations or encumbrances arising out of or related to this Agreement.
14. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS
Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or
termination of this Agreement do survive such term, cancellation or termination. Such
provisions include but are not limited to: SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED (as to
ownership of property); INDEPENDENT CITY; INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE;
DUTY TO NOTIFY; DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY; RECORDS-
AVAILABILITY/ACCESS; DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION/TERMINATION;
MEDIA OUTREACH; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS.
15. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
In order to coordinate the services of CITY with the activities of the AUTHORITY so as
to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, Ryan Kelley, Manager, Transit Oriented
Development, or successor (“Contract Administrator”), shall manage this Agreement on
behalf of AUTHORITY and serve as liaison between AUTHORITY and CITY. Bill
Neuendorf, Edina Economic Development Manager, or successor shall manage the
project on behalf of the CITY.
16. COMPLIANCE AND NON-DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION
A. CITY shall comply with all applicable law, conditions of any funding sources,
regulations, rules and ordinances currently in force or later enacted.
B. CITY certifies that it is not prohibited from doing business with either the federal
government or the state of Minnesota as a result of debarment or suspension
proceedings. CITY shall immediately notify AUTHORITY if CITY is debarred
or suspended during the term of this Agreement.
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 10
17. NOTICES
Unless the parties otherwise agree in writing, any notice or demand which must be given
or made by a party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing
and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to AUTHORITY shall be sent to
the Executive Director with a copy to the originating AUTHORITY department at the
address given in the opening paragraph of this Agreement. Notice to CITY shall be sent
to the address stated in the opening paragraph of this Agreement or to the address stated
in CITY’s Form W-9 provided to AUTHORITY.
18. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CITY affirms that to the best of CITY’s knowledge, CITY’s involvement in this
Agreement does not result in a conflict or potential conflict of interest with any party or
entity which may be affected by the terms of this Agreement. Should any conflict or
potential conflict of interest become known to CITY, CITY shall immediately notify
AUTHORITY of the conflict or potential conflict, specifying the part of this Agreement
giving rise to the conflict or potential conflict, and advise AUTHORITY whether CITY
will or will not resign from the other engagement or representation. Unless waived by
AUTHORITY, a conflict or potential conflict may, in AUTHORITY’s discretion, be
cause for cancellation or termination of this Agreement.
19. MEDIA OUTREACH
CITY shall notify AUTHORITY, prior to publication, release, or occurrence of any
Outreach (as defined below). The parties shall coordinate to produce collaborative and
mutually acceptable Outreach. For clarification and not limitation, all Outreach shall be
approved by AUTHORITY prior to publication or release. As used herein, the term
“Outreach” shall mean all media, social media, news releases, external facing
communications, advertising, marketing, promotions, client lists, civic/community events
or opportunities, and/or other forms of outreach created by, or on behalf of, CITY (i) that
reference or otherwise use the term “Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment
Authority” or any derivative thereof; or (ii) that directly or indirectly relate to, reference,
or concern AUTHORITY, this Agreement, the services performed hereunder, or
AUTHORITY personnel, including but not limited to Hennepin County employees and
elected officials.
20. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN
The laws of the state of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations
concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations
between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for
any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, state of
Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the
appropriate federal court within the state of Minnesota.
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 11
THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 12
AUTHORITY BOARD AUTHORIZATION
HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Reviewed by the
County Attorney’s Office:
By:
Chair of Its County Board
Date:
ATTEST:
Deputy/Clerk of County Board
Date:
By:
Executive Director
Date:
By:
Deputy Executive Director
Date:
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 13
CITY
CITY warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of
CITY as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.*
By:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Date:
*CITY shall submit applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that
confirms the signatory’s delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the
time CITY returns the Agreement to COUNTY. Documentation is not required for a sole
proprietorship.
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 14
EXHIBIT A – Scope of Work
City of Edina | 50th France Business District Wayfinding
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
The City of Edina aims to improve pedestrian navigation in the 50th and France commercial district by
implementing a comprehensive wayfinding strategy. The primary objectives are to enhance the customer
experience, support small businesses, and elevate the area's overall appeal. The structured approach will
allow for creativity, cultural awareness, and the establishment of a unique sense of placemaking.
This phased implementation strategy will be a partnership from the City of Edina, Hennepin County, and
the 50th-France Business Association to create an impactful and effective wayfinding system. The
City has final decision making responsibility regarding the design, content, placement, sequencing,
prioritization and overall implementation of the Strategic Plan prepared for this wayfinding project.
ACTIVITIES AND DELIVERABLES
Task 1. Wayfinding Strategic Plan Preparation
Conduct a detailed analysis of the pedestrian walkways and parking areas within the
district and devise a comprehensive wayfinding strategy.
Identify the primary and secondary locations for large directories and smaller directional signs.
Suggest distinctive markers or design elements aiding wayfinding.
Recommend a naming convention for pedestrian routes, and incorporate with interactive
online mapping tools.
Task 2. Implementation of Highest Priority Directories, Signage and Other Identified
Priority Elements
Purchase and install the most impactful directories and directional markers as outlined in
the above strategic plan (Task 1) within the available budget.
Focus on creating a simplified and effective customer experience, integrating maps,
business names, QR codes, or other relevant items as outlined in the strategic plan.
Update online mapping tools with the installed directories and markers.
Task 3. Implementation of Distinctive Design Elements
Install distinctive markers or design elements aiding in wayfinding.
Emphasize the universal recognition of these elements for diverse demographics
regardless of language, age, or background.
Task 4. Implementation of Second Priority Items, as outlined in the Strategic Plan
Create welcoming signage at key entry points of the district
Enhance the district's unique identity through naming conventions on maps and
promotional materials.
Other items may be included and eligible for Hennepin County reimbursement upon prior
approval
Form 101 (Revised 8/2022) 15
PROJECT BUDGET AND ELIBIBLE REIMBURSEMENTS
The proposed budget (below) includes matching funds of $20,000 for wayfinding improvements.
50th & France Pedestrian Wayfinding- Project
Scope of Work Budgeted
Amount Funding Source
Task 1: Prepare strategic plan $15,000 City
Task 2: Implement highest impact directories
and/or directional signs $35,000 County
Task 3a: Implement distinctive design elements
for wayfinding $10,000 City
Task 3b: Implement- expanded distinct design
elements for wayfinding $10,000 TBD
Task 4a: Install coordinated welcome signage at
key entry points $5,000 TBD
Task 4b – Install additional phases of directories
and directional signs, when funds are available $25,000 TBD
Task 4c – Install additional design elements for
wayfinding, when funds are available $20,000 TBD
Total Project Estimate $120,000
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.O.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Gillian Straub, City Management Fellow
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Contract for Services with Edina Resource
Center
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the 2024 contract for services with the Edina Resource Center.
INTRODUCTION:
The Edina Resource Center requests $50,000 for operations funding in 2024. Services provided include
connecting residents to information, services and resources to meet their basic needs, including food access,
housing, healthcare and more.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Edina Resource Center Service Agreement
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390
Human Services Funding SERVICE AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 19th day of March 2024, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation
("City"), and Independent School District No. 273, a.k.a. Edina Resource Center ("Service Provider").
RECITALS
A.Service Provider has requested funds from the City for the purposes of serving residents of Edina for the calendar year
of 2024.
B.Minn. Stat. § M.S. 145A.04, 471.935, 412.221 Subd. 32 authorizes the City to appropriate money and make expenditures
for the specified purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1.PAYMENT. The City hereby grants Service Provider $50,000 for the purpose requested to be spent for the benefit of
Edina residents.
2.SERVICES PROVIDED. Service Provider shall use the funds exclusively for the purposes for which it was requested. If
the funds or any part of it is not used for the purpose intended, it shall be returned to the City. Purpose for Service
Provider is:
•In-person, phone and online support to connect residents to community information, resources, programs and
services
•Free and confidential services
•Connections and collaborations with community providers (i.e. VEAP, Bloomington Public Health, Senior
Community services)
•Staff Liaison to the Edina Community Council3.GENERAL CONDITIONS.
a.Service Provider agrees that it will comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and ordinances relating to
nondiscrimination.
b.Service Provider shall at all times be an independent contractor and shall not be the employee of the City for any
purpose.
c.All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is
governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or
any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy.
d.All books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Service Provider and its (sub)
contractor(s), if any, relative to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City.
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
(Mayor)
AND:
(City Manager)
SERVICE PROVIDER:
Mert Woodard
Director, Finance & Operations
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VI.P.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve 2024 Liquor License Renewals for Cub
Foods and Speedway #4047
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve 2024 liquor license renewals for Cub Foods and Speedway $4047.
INTRODUCTION:
Recall on Mar. 6, most liquor license renewals were approved. Cub Foods and Speedway #4047 are the
remaining renewals for approval. Background checks were completed by the P olice Department and approvals
were recommended for April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VII.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Other
From:Scott Neal, City Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Introduce Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VII.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Other
From:Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Stormwater Utility Overview Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None, information only.
INTRODUCTION:
The attached report provides an overview of the stormwater utility prior to the discussion on the Clean Water
Strategy.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Staff Report: Stormwater Utility Overview
Stormwater Utility Overview Staff Presentation
March 19, 2024
Mayor and City Council
Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager
Stormwater Utility Overview
Introduction This memo summarizes the storm sewer utility, summarizing system services, system understanding,
risk and resilience and includes general information about current trends and the state of the practice
to renew aging infrastructure and plan for growing service demands.
Background Edina’s water, sanitary and stormwater systems provide necessary and valuable services that are
central to public quality of life. The services depend on aging infrastructure and are subject to new
demands as part of a growing and aging city. This report was first created in 2014, when the
Engineering Department provided an overview of utility planning and growth issues. In 2015 the
review was broadened to include a State of the Utilities report. These reports were then used in the
development of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, 2020 Flood Risk Reduction Strategy and 2022 Water
Resources Management Plan. This report is a stormwater specific update to summarize the
referenced documents.
Services Delivered The City of Edina operates a public stormwater utility. The core services of which promotes the
public health, safety and welfare by:
1) Managing flood risk and stormwater runoff
a. comprehensively reduce the risk of flooding throughout the community
b. reducing overall exposure to flood waters
c. reducing the vulnerability of flood exposed structures public and private
d. providing equitable access to support for readiness, response, and recovery
2) Providing clean water services
a. Mitigating and preventing pollution of waters to protect and improve the health of
local water bodies and the environmental services they provide
3) Restoring and protecting natural resources
STAFF REPORT Page 2
a. Protect and enhance wetlands, soils and native landscapes
b. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat
System Understanding
The following is a brief description of the stormwater infrastructure:
An overview of the service(s) provided, system extents and critical design considerations.
Storm sewer conveyance system infrastructure is built to carry the water from a storm with
a 10% chance of occurring each year for neighborhood and lateral systems, and water from a
storm with a 1% chance of occurring each year for trunk and regional systems. Floodplain is
managed to minimize damage and maintain flood storage and conveyance capacity.
Stormwater treatment infrastructure is built to meet regulation defined pollutant removal
targets, and is complemented by programmatic pollution prevention techniques and system
maintenance such as street sweeping, stormwater education, illicit discharge enforcement and
sediment trap manhole cleaning.
Infrastructure summary: A description of major components of the system, scale of system and
current estimated replacement value (not including soft costs such as engineering, inspection,
financing, admin, or restoration costs such pavement or sod.)
The stormwater system includes 415.8 miles of curb and gutter, 126.5 miles of gravity main
ranging from 12-84” in diameter, 6480 manholes, 668 outlets, 74.3 miles of sump drain, 11
stormwater lift stations, 1.6 miles of stormwater force main, 63 stormwater BMPs, and
numerous sediment trap structures. The estimated 2022 total replacement value of this
public infrastructure is nearly $150 million. The system also relies on the function of $25
million replacement value private infrastructure.
System understanding: List of the most recent plans, review of the key design variables, reliability and
risks.
The current system understanding is based on the 2022 Water Resources Management Plan
by Barr Engineering and includes digital models to test performance and service. The
collection system is designed to provide drainage and manage stormwater runoff. Much of
the system was built to no, or old standards and now considered undersized, and flood
storage areas now have higher peak flood elevations. Treatment systems are designed to
meet pollutant removal standards set by the State and Watershed Districts. Clean water
service demand due to waterbody specific Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) regulation is
increasing. There is no reliable estimate for future liability.
Function and condition assessment: Review of methods to assess system and overview of issues with
age and existing materials.
The current condition assessment is noncomprehensive and as needed through visual
inspection of storm manholes and outlets and some closed-circuit televising of lines where
issues are noted. System function is checked with a calibrated computer model and through
STAFF REPORT Page 3
visual inspection after large storm events. Pollution removal is estimated with an un-
calibrated computer model.
This system understanding is little changed from previous years, but in 2022 revisions to the sewer
and stormwater models and planning documents included some 2D modeling of flood flow paths that
have provided valuable information to planning flood risk reduction measures.
Planning For Renewal The stormwater utility services are provided using extensive physical infrastructure and modest
programmatic efforts. The utility is planned, operated, maintained, expanded, replaced, and managed
by professional staff in the City’s Public Works and Engineering departments. Engineers and system
operators use ISO55000 principles of “infrastructure asset management” to set service levels, assess
the present condition of the infrastructure, judge system performance, plan for repair, replacement,
or future upgrades, and assess risks.
The tools used to manage aging infrastructure are becoming increasingly data intensive, but lead to
better decisions. The assembly of system data is generally digital, using a geographical information
system (GIS) map, XP-SWMM hydraulic model and P8 water quality model. Also increasing
management complexities are the better scientific understanding of both the chemical, physical and
biological processes acting on the systems and the infrastructure’s interaction with the natural
systems on which each utility service depends. Evolving methods of assessing system condition such
as standardized pipe and manhole condition assessment protocols using remote cameras and closed-
circuit television allow nuanced replacement decisions based on component-specific conditions.
Planning For Growth The Edina Comprehensive Plan was updated in 2020 and the Water Resources Management Plan in
2022. Generally, service demands for stormwater are stable-to-growing based on customer
expectations, and climate change.
Storm system flows are linked to hydrologic, geologic and geometric attributes such as the
connectivity in a drainage area, the percent of a site that is impervious, condition of the soil, and
vegetation. In general, the service demands for clean water and flood protection are growing based
on increased understanding of natural systems and regulation by state and local watersheds to
remediate and protect local waters. While Nine Mile Creek capacity in southeast Edina show some
flooding risk, infrastructure used to provide local flood protections is generally robust, and soil
conditions in much of the area are favorable to reducing runoff. There is an increasing pressure on
flow due to redevelopment at higher densities, but local controls require much of the flow and water
quality treatments to happen on-site for large lot and commercial development. This trend will lead
to less utilization of city infrastructure for small storm events, and a continued reliance for large
storm events. Residential redevelopment runs counter to this trend because treatment and control
is not required for lots less than one acre in size.
Conclusion
STAFF REPORT Page 4
The stormwater utility provides critical public health, safety, and environmental health services. The
service relies on aging infrastructure systems, the operations, maintenance, engineering, design and
renewal and replacement of which support their continual function. The City is well served when it
is planning for the growth and renewal of its aging utility infrastructure and the level of investment is
favorable to support localized demand growth and its continued function.
EdinaMN.gov
Stormwater Utility Overview
March 19, 2024
Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager
Stormwater Utility Outline
•Mission / service
•Key trends
•Key partners
•Key strategies
•Governance
•Financial overview
•Capital expenditures / infrastructure replacement value
•Operational expenditures
•How we change and grow
City of Edina Mission Statement
Our mission is to provide
effective and valued public
services, maintain a sound public
infrastructure, offer premier
public facilities and guide the
development and redevelopment
of lands, all in a manner that
sustains and improves the health
and uncommonly high quality of
life enjoyed by our residents and
businesses.
Mission / Service
Water Resources Management Plan
(2022) Comprehensive Plan (2021)
•Flood risk and stormwater management
•Clean water services
•Natural resource restoration and
protection
Service set by mix of technical
requirements and customer demand
•Minimum standards from regulation
•Council strategy and policy
Key Trends
Challenges; past, present and future
•Age of development and redevelopment
•Aging infrastructure
•Climate Change
Edina plans and efforts that address key trends
•Vision Edina / Comprehensive Plan / CIP / Budget /
•Climate Action / Living Streets / Parks Strategic
•Water Resources Management / Flood Risk Reduction Strategy / Clean Water Strategy
The storm utility is the youngest, most interrelated and complex water utility we manage. Working with natural systems make tying actions to outcomes, expectations to measure of success more difficult.
Key Partners
Government
•Federal > State > Watersheds > Cities
•Met Council
Private
•Consultants, material and technology suppliers, contractors, developers,
builders, landowners, residents
Nonprofit
•Lake associations, professional organizations, universities,
nongovernmental organizations
Key Strategies
Industry frameworks that address key trends
•One-Water, watershed scale governance, natural and built systems integrated planning, systems understanding, systems engineering
•Infrastructure asset management
•Climate adaptation, mitigation and resilience, risk management
Charting a path / Reimagination and reinvestment
•Use an integrated project scope decision making process that align with road other utility needs and partners with customer and stakeholders.
•We do our best to understand the natural/built interface, how new demands affects each system, and prepare the people, infrastructure and environment for the future.
Governance
Comprehensive Plan chapter 7 (2020) -Stormwater Utility
•Council: Strategic and policy direction
•City Manager: CEO (18)
•Key strategy –Infrastructure Asset Management
•Public Works: Lifecycle Delivery Topics (15, 17, 19, 20)
•Engineering: Lifecycle Delivery Topic (11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 21)
Figures from “Asset Management - an anatomy”
Institute of Asset Management (2015)
Financial Overview
Financial overview and breakdown by service
•Flood Risk / Stormwater runoff management
•Clean water services
•Natural resource restoration and protection
•Lake & pond vegetation management
Where the programs lay in the budget and CIP
•CIP / Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) / Engineering
•Budget / Operational Expenditures (OPEX) / Public Works
Capital Expenditures
•Engineering
•Neighborhood reconstruction
program
•Standalone flood projects
•Examples (top items)
•Storm pipe
•Curb & gutter
•Manholes
•Sump drain
•Public treatment practices
•~$150M replacement value
Operational expenditures
•Public Works (all),
•Engineering (programs)
•Overhead
•Utility billing, finance, IT,
admin, facilities
•Examples (top items)
•Internal services charges
•Repairs & maintenance
•Public works staff
•Professional services
•Materials, supplies
How we change and grow
•2018 CWRMP / Flood clean water focus
•2020 Flood Risk reduction Strategy
•2021 Climate Action Plan
•2022 WRMP Major Amendment and Utility Rate Study, $50M 20-year plan.
•2022 CWS P1 – Data and benchmarking
•2023 CWS P2 – Engagement, Policy (service levels & prioritization)
•2025 CWS P3 – Programs and Resources, WRMP Major Amendment
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VII.C.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Other
From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Clean Water Strategy Vision (Values and Goals)
Preview
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None, information only.
INTRODUCTION:
Staff will preview the proposed Clean Water Strategy Vision (values and goals).
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Staff Report: Clean Water Vision Preview
The Minnesota Water Management Framework
CIP 2023-2028 CWS Pages
August 15 2023 Work Session Materials
Clean Water Strategy Staff Presentation
March 19, 2024
Mayor and City Council
Jessica Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Manager
Clean Water Strategy Vision (Values and Goals) Preview
Information / Background:
Staff presented a discussion and sought feedback from Council at their August 15th, 2023 work session
meeting. Staff heard a lack of consensus on the decision to be made, disagreement on what clean water
means (water managed for water quality/clarity or clear of vegetation for recreational uses), interest in
understanding how the city’s water resources management fits into the work of other agencies and
organizations, confusion about the status quo versus what the city could be doing, as well as confusion about
where in the landscape actions occur (watershed or in-lake), their applicability to the problem, and relative
benefit and cost. This presentation and staff report attempts to address the comments and questions from
the August 15th, 2023 work session and to share a preview of the staff recommendation for the clean water
strategy vision. Staff intends to ask Council to make a decision on the clean water strategy vision at a future
meeting in spring 2024.
This staff report has the following sections;
Proposed Clean Water Vision (values and goals)
Additional information/background
Why establish a Clean Water Strategy
Clear versus turbid water condition explained, with photos
Edina’s proposed Clean Water Strategy and the broader context of water resources
management
‘Status Quo’ service level versus ‘Clean Water Vision’ service level
Prioritization and potential phase 3
Proposed Clean Water Vision (values and goals)
It is important that we establish strategic objectives (set vision and goals) so that we can focus on meeting
them in a systematic, risk-based, prioritized, and cost-effective manner. The vision sets the framework and is
the foundation for the strategy.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Further background on the development of the vision, values, goals, and priorities were provided at the
August 15th, 2023, work session and are provided as attachments.
Clean Water Strategy Vision
The city has the opportunity to set local priorities, service levels, and to impact the pace of achievement for
clean water. The Clean Water Strategy would define the city’s vision and priorities for management.
Staff recommends a clean water vision in which shallow lakes would be managed for an outcome which
prioritizes wildlife habitat and natural aesthetic views. The proposed clean water vision is:
Edina’s waterbodies are in a healthy ecosystem equilibrium, where waters are clear,
safe, and accessible.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their source and help people do their part.
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain infrastructure and take actions to capture and
remove pollutants.
Protect and restore ecological processes: We protect and restore natural ecosystems on land
and in water.
Values and Goals The following values and goals were framed by community values as described in the established budget
pillars, city values, quality of life surveys, and regulatory and stakeholder requirements. These were further
refined based on public feedback received. The proposed Clean Water Strategy vision was developed from
these values and goals.
Ecosystems are in a healthy equilibrium; water is clear and environmental benefits are
sustained.
Water clarity improves as people use water friendly practices.
Water is safe for human contact.
Waters support native plants, insects, and animals consistent with an urban setting.
Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for wildlife consistent with urban lands.
City actions align to do the most good towards measurable, desirable clean water
outcomes leveraging creativity and innovation.
The city uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’ model to make progress.
The city uses a systems approach in its implementation to consider cumulative benefits.
The city performs active management to improve or maintain water clarity and chemistry at
levels appropriate for urban waters.
Pollution is managed towards achieving water resource conditions that meet standards and
support community uses.
In-lake management practices are applied towards achieving conditions that meet standards
and support community uses.
Clean water goals are pursued with consideration for multiple benefits and available
resources.
STAFF REPORT Page 3
People are connected to the land and water in reciprocity, both caring for nature and
enjoying the benefits of a healthy environment.
People access and interpret knowledge and guidance on urban clean water goals and
behaviors that promote them.
People pursue activities that promote clean water and natural resource stewardship.
Waters are restored or maintained in conditions allowing for beneficial uses.
All people have access to water and the cultural values and environmental benefits they
provide.
Clean water actions prioritize waters with public access.
Clean water strategies recognize the diverse ways people value and experience the city’s
waters.
Additional Information/Background
Why establish a Clean Water Strategy?
The waterbodies in Edina are currently not healthy. A new plan for achieving clean water is necessary to
incorporate the latest scientific knowledge about urban streams and shallow lakes. The goal is to strive to
meet the expectations of the community by taking management actions that lead to waters being clear, safe,
and accessible. The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan included a commitment to
develop the Clean Water Strategy to define clean water goals and plan implementation opportunities.
Clear versus turbid water condition explained, with photos
All lakes and ponds in Edina are considered shallow. The deepest lake, Mirror Lake, is about 15 ft deep at its
maximum depth. Shallow lakes behave differently than deep lakes. Especially in urban settings, small shallow
lakes tend to be warmer, more nutrient rich, and more prolific with aquatic plants and algae. The forces of
urbanization and climate change have outsized influence on small aquatic ecosystems. Urbanization has
permanently and significantly altered Edina’s landscape. Climate change has already and will continue to
stress these systems.
Shallow lakes can exist in one of two states – clear or turbid. In the clear condition, diverse, native plant
communities help to control excess nutrients and provide valuable habitat. Turbid lakes have excess algae
and suspended sediment that limits the growth of aquatic plants and the benefits they provide.
Unfortunately, it can be difficult to restore a turbid lake to a clear-water condition due to the complex
ecology within these systems.
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Figure from Clean Water Vision public meeting board
Lakes in the turbid condition can mean that boating is
less impacted by plants, though the city and watershed
district may be issuing recreation advisories because of
potential adverse health affects from exposure to
harmful algal blooms. Turbid lakes can have more open
water (plantless) views.
The images on the right from Lake Cornelia in October
2020 (top) and August 2022 (bottom) show a turbid
water condition. The image below from Centerville Lake
in Lino Lakes, taken September 2023 illustrates a turbid
lake with a severe harmful algal bloom.
Lake Cornelia
October 2020 (top) and August 2022 (bottom)
Centerville Lake in Lino Lakes
September 2023
STAFF REPORT Page 5
A clear water condition is consistent
with the desired uses staff heard in
summer 2023 as part of the
engagement for the development of the
Clean Water Strategy. Lakes in the
clear water condition support wildlife
viewing, good fish habitat, healthier lake
ecology, and recreation among native
aquatic plants.
Staff recommends a clean water vision
in which shallow lakes would be
managed for an outcome which
prioritizes wildlife habitat and natural
aesthetic views. Native rooted, floating,
and emergent aquatic vegetation would
be encouraged for their ability to support wildlife and
sequester nutrients that would otherwise be available for
algae to grow.
The images on the right from Melody Lake in August 2023
demonstrate a clear water condition. Diverse, native aquatic
plant communities are present, and clarity is such that the
lake bottom is visible. The image below from Gilbert Lake,
MN (near Brainerd) from July 2022 also represents a clear
water condition.
Melody Lake
August 2023 (above and below)
Gilbert Lake, MN
(near Brainerd)
July 2022
STAFF REPORT Page 6
Edina’s proposed Clean Water Strategy and the broader context of water resources
management
Clean water goals and priorities are well defined at the national, state, regional, and watershed district scale.
• National: The Clean Water Act (CWA) of the 1970s is the principal law governing pollution control
and water quality of the Nation's waterways. The objective of the CWA is to restore and maintain
the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation's waters.
• State: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) defines state standards for water quality
and evaluates waterbodies. Several waterbodies in Edina are considered ‘impaired’ which means they
are failing to meet state standards for various reasons (excess nutrients, sediment, chloride, and
bacteria). The state has defined its priority waters and pollutants. Impaired waters in Edina include
Lake Cornelia, Lake Edina, Nine Mile Creek, and Minnehaha Creek. Other downstream waterbodies
with impairments include Lake Hiawatha in Minneapolis, the Mississippi River, and Lake Pepin (on
the Minnesota/Wisconsin border, near Lake City, Minnesota). The primary focus of the state is to
improve and restore impaired waterbodies. The MPCA enforces the Clean Water Act at the local
level through its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit program.
The Minnesota Water Management Framework (included as an attachment) provides a high-level
summary of how agencies work together on managing Minnesota’s water resources.
• Regional: The Metropolitan Council published its latest Priority Waters List in 2022 with the goal to
help sustainably manage regionally significant waterbodies. Nine Mile Creek (both north fork and
south fork) and Minnehaha Creek were included. No lakes in Edina were included in the list.
• Watershed District: Minnehaha Creek has defined their vision for a balanced urban ecology. They’ve
also defined their strategy for achieving it. According to their website, “To achieve a balanced urban
ecology, we focus on two strategic priorities: partnering to deliver high-impact projects that result
in regional benefits, and collaborating with others to shape policies that advance watershed
management goals.” The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has defined their priority areas of
work which include Six Mile Creek-Halsted Bay Subwatershed (west of Lake Minnetonka) and the
Minnehaha Creek Greenway (a linear park in Hopkins and St Louis Park).
• Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek works to manage, protect and enhance water resources for
everyone’s benefit. According to their publications, the NMCWD’s approach to evaluating and
improving lake health includes numerous health assessment factors, as illustrated in the figure below.
The primary factors identified as affecting lake ecological health include chemical water quality (e.g.,
nutrient concentrations), aquatic communities, and water quantity (groundwater and surface water).
The effects of recreation and wildlife habitat on overall lake health are also considered. The Nine
Mile Creek Watershed District has defined their priorities which include Lake Cornelia, Lake Edina,
Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, and Mirror Lake.
STAFF REPORT Page 7
• City: The City of Edina has a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The permit describes the minimum actions the city must take
to manage its stormwater system. Outside of MS4 permit requirements, there are many good
options for restoring and protecting waterbodies. The city’s current approach is to achieve the
regulatory minimum which puts us on a generational timeframe for making progress toward clean
water outcomes. Much of the progress that has been made in the last decade has been driven by
overlying watershed district partners based on their locally defined goals and priorities which often
exceed the regulatory minimum.
The City of Edina doesn’t have a plan for driving toward clean water outcomes. What we do have is the
minimum required by regulators and partners as well as a process for responding to requests for aquatic
plant management which, although allowed with a permit by the DNR for recreation purposes, can disrupt
ecological processes that can help make the goal of clean water easier to achieve. Development of a clean
water strategy was included in the city’s 2018 Water Resources Management Plan.
The city has the opportunity to set local priorities, service levels, and impact the pace of
achievement for clean water. The Clean Water Strategy would define the vision and priorities.
Following a policy decision staff will propose implementation options based on the Policy and future
guidance from Council.
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Lake Health infographic
STAFF REPORT Page 8
‘Status Quo’ service level versus ‘Clean Water Vision’ service level
The current regulatory paradigm focuses on watershed pollutants and capital infrastructure (private and
public lands), and the storm sewer system. These strategies are long-term, expensive, and occur over a
generational timeframe. Further, in the status quo approach, priority waterbodies and pollutants are chosen
by others. We could do more, but we could also choose not to (maintaining the status quo) and still be in
compliance with all our stakeholders.
The portfolio of actions we could take includes new actions, enhanced existing actions, continued actions, or
discontinued actions. Here are some examples;
1. In lake nutrient management: A new action for the city would be to invest in in-lake management
strategies. Lake studies conducted by Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in south Lake Cornelia,
Mirror Lake, Arrowhead Lake, and Indianhead Lake have shown that nutrients from the lake
sediments are a major contributor to poor water quality. In-lake management activities have some
of the lowest relative cost and highest benefit.
2. Pollution prevention and mitigation: Invest more in existing programs that take place on the
landscape such as street sweeping and more city-owned clean water infrastructure as well as
implement pollution source control activities that make sense on a broader scale. Street sweeping
has one of the best returns on investment and the city has been ramping up this strategy in areas
identified cooperatively with Watershed District partners. Additionally, source control is the chief
strategy for managing chloride pollution and while the city has made significant strides in chloride
source control, we could continue to invest in technology, training, and equipment. We could also
expand resources and tools to people to prevent and mitigate pollution from private property.
3. Natural resources restoration and protection: Expand control of invasive species that cause water
quality problems and discontinue activities that harm healthy ecosystems. We could also expand
resources and tools to help people restore and protect natural resources on private property.
Two graphics were created to demonstrate the status quo and contrast it with an ambitious clean water
strategy in which the city goes beyond minimum requirements of stakeholders and programs activities to
achieve its locally defined goals and priorities. These service levels are defined as ‘Status Quo’ and ‘Clean
Water Vision’. There are a number of things that the city can do to help improve water quality. These
activities have different levels of cost and different anticipated scales of potential benefit. These graphics are
meant to be illustrative, and a more detailed plan would be developed in a potential phase 3 effort.
‘Status Quo’ Service Level
Priority waterbodies: Established by the state; expanded upon by watershed districts (WDs).
Priority pollutants/stressors: Established by state standards - nutrients, sediment, bacteria,
chloride, low dissolved oxygen.
Priority implementation activities:
o Meet legal requirements.
o City actions driven by minimum requirements of the MS4 permit –focused on regulatory
compliance, not necessarily outcomes at the resource.
o The city responds to requests for aquatic plant management which makes meeting the state
and WD goals more difficult.
o WD leads and implements projects per their lake studies.
STAFF REPORT Page 9
Pace: Determined by others.
Outcome: Determined by others.
Relative budget impact: $$
‘Status Quo’ Service Level
Adopting the ‘Status Quo’ service level would mean canceling the Clean Water Strategy effort. We would
continue to meet the requirements of our stakeholders.
‘Clean Water Vision’ Service Level
At this ‘Clean Water Vision’ level of service, priority waterbodies and pollutants/stressors are defined by a
combination of state, watershed district, and city. The city defines the desired outcome, in line with others.
The implementation activities, pace, and city budget change. General chemical destruction of native plants
would cease. The activities in bold on the graphic are enhanced or new.
Priority waterbodies: Established by a combination of state, watershed district, and city priorities.
Priority pollutants/stressors: The city focuses on its priorities – nutrients, sediment, and
chloride.
STAFF REPORT Page 10
Priority implementation activities:
o Meet legal requirements.
o City actions driven by community-defined priorities.
o City actions focus on outcomes at the resource. WD leads and implements projects per
their lake studies.
o City seeks out further opportunities to accelerate or enhance community-defined goals in
community-defined priority waterbodies. This could be additional street sweeping in priority
areas, targeted in-lake sediment treatments, city-owned infrastructure investments, higher
regulatory standards.
Pace: Determined by the city, leveraging ongoing work of others.
Outcome: Defined by the city, in line with others.
Relative budget impact: $$ $$ $$
‘Clean Water Vision’ Service Level
Adopting the ‘Clean Water Vision’ service level would mean setting local priorities and impacting the pace
of achievement. It would mean more aggressive implementation, enhancing some existing activities and also
STAFF REPORT Page 11
adding new activities, and require more budget than the ‘Status Quo’ service level. The activities and
associated budget would be further clarified in the potential phase 3 scope of work. Staff could develop
detailed management plans for priority waterbodies with various scales of implementation for Council to
consider.
Many of the activities at the ‘Clean Water Vision’ service level can have varying degrees of implementation.
For example, street sweeping could be programmed twice per year, twice per quarter, or twice per month.
Staff proposes to draft an implementation plan with associated costs in phase 3 of the Clean Water Strategy
development, after the vision has been defined and staff gets further clarity on which outcome to drive
toward. Staff would present a recommendation and the City Council will have another opportunity to right-
size the degree of implementation based on the desired pace and budget.
Prioritization and potential phase 3 At the August 15, 2023 work session meeting we didn’t hear feedback from Council on the waterbody
prioritization framework, waterbody prioritization list, priority pollutants, or potential phase 3 scope. We
plan to bring forward these recommendations from August into phase 3.
Priority waterbodies and prioritization framework
Developing a framework for prioritizing waterbodies helps focus the implementation of clean water services.
Restoring and protecting waterbodies takes significant resources and without prioritization, the city’s
resources are spread thin. The prioritization criteria and factors were framed around community values and
goals.
Criteria for priority waterbodies is based on resource condition (water quality, aquatic invasive species, and
public health), physical/geographic characteristics, and public use and access.
We will focus our primary effort on highest priority waterbodies, build on our successes, and learn from our
failures. Low and non-priority waterbodies would receive a lower tier of service.
STAFF REPORT Page 12
This table represents the prioritization framework in practice. All other waterbodies have not yet been
scored but could be evaluated using the provided framework, then this list could be amended based on how
a particular waterbody scores.
Highest Priority Tier 2 Tier 3
Lake Cornelia
Lake Edina
Minnehaha Creek
Nine Mile Creek – North Fork
Arrowhead Lake
Highland Lake
Indianhead Lake
Lake Nancy
Melody Lake
Mirror Lake
Otto Pond
Lake Pamela
Mud Lake/Bredesen Park
Nine Mile Creek – South Fork
Point of France Pond
Southwest Ponds
Swimming Pool Pond
Non-priority
Birchcrest Pond
Hawkes Lake
Lake Harvey
Vernon Ave/View Lane Pond
West Garrison Pond
Ponds <1 acre
Priority pollutants
We will focus our primary effort on these priority pollutants and continue to observe non-priority
pollutants and trends in partnership with local watershed districts and state agencies.
Nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen)
Sediment
Chloride
Potential phase 3 components and outcomes
We’ve taken a phased approach to development of the Clean Water Strategy.
Phase I (complete): Current State of Edina’s Program
Staff reports are available from the August 3, 2022 work session and December 20, 2022
City Council meeting, linked at the end of this report. Lake summaries and fact sheets can
be found in the online Water Resources Library and on the project webpage,
www.bettertogetheredina.org/clean-water-strategy.
Phase 2 (current): Vision (Values and Goals), Priorities
Phase 3 (future): Detailed management plans for priority waterbodies, including a pilot effort at Lake
Cornelia or other lakes as a later step, after buy-in on the policy level.
Per direction from Council, staff could develop a scope for a potential phase 3 with the following
components and outcomes;
STAFF REPORT Page 13
Public participation plan for phase 3
A technical study (pilot at Lake Cornelia) including a breakdown of opportunity spaces where
pollutants are coming from (the upstream watershed, upstream waterbodies, in-lake sources), and
the costs and relative benefit of actions within those spaces. This would clarify which actions make
the most sense to pursue so that we are making wise investments to meet the goals in the most
efficient manner. It would also clarify the level and pace of achievement we might expect to see. We
would leverage existing studies as part of this work.
o See attached pages from 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan for Project #19-342 and #19-
346 which fund development of the strategy, its implementation, and its inclusion in the
Water Resources Management Plan through a major amendment.
A recommendation for defined levels of service, taken through an asset management approach,
driven by community values and goals.
A recommendation for resourcing a proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
A schedule and process for accountability in implementing the proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
Tools for communicating the Clean Water Strategy (to be pursued as part of updating the Water
Resources Management Plan).
Web resources including FAQs for residents.
The outcome of this work would likely lead to a major amendment to the Water Resources Management
Plan.
Links to past conversations on this topic
August 15, 2023 – Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and Priorities Discussion
May 16, 2023 - Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and Priorities Update
December 20, 2022 – Request for Purchase: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Phase 2 and
Participation Plan
August 3, 2022 – Work Session – Clean Water Strategy Summary
March 5, 2019 – Work Session – Water Resources Management – Morningside Neighborhood Flood Risk
Reduction Strategy, Lake Cornelia Clean Water Strategy, and Chloride Pollution Prevention
September 5, 2018 – Adoption of 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
April 3, 2018 – Work Session – Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – Implementation
Discussion
January 17, 2018 – Authorize Staff to Submit Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan for
Agency Review
November 21, 2017 – Work Session – Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
Presentation for Review and Comment
Connecting
state programs
with local
leadership
Amu
Restoration and
Protection
Strategy
Development
Water Resource
Characterization
& Problem
Investigation
•
•
10
Year
Cycle
Monitoring and
Assessment
Comprehensive
Watershed
Management
Plan
October 15,2014
The Minnesota Water Management Framework
A high-level, multi-agency, collaborative perspective on managing Minnesota's water resources
CLEAN
WATER
LAND &
LEGACY
AMENDMENT
The red arrow emphasizes
the important connection
between state water
programs and local water
management. Local
partners are involved -
and often lead - in each
stage in this framework.
The passage of the Clean Water, Land, and Legacy Amendment is a
game-changer for water resource management in Minnesota.
Increased funding and public expectations have driven the need for
more and better coordination among the state's main water
management agencies.
The MN Water Quality Framework and the companion MN
Groundwater Management Framework were developed by the
agencies to enhance collaboration and clarify roles in an integrated
water governance structure, so that it's clear to everyone who is
responsible at each stage in the process, making it easier and more
efficient for state and local partners to work together.
Goals: cleaner water via comprehensive watershed management;
Ongoing Local
Implementation
Building on a classic "plan - do - check" adaptive management
approach, the framework uses 5 "boxes" to outline the steps
Minnesota's agencies are taking toward our goals of clean and
sustainable water. The agencies aim to streamline water management
by systematically and predictably delivering data, research, and
analysis and empowering local action.
Ongoing Local Implementation is at the heart of the state's overall
strategy for clean water. Actions must be prioritized, targeted, and
measurable in order to ensure limited resources are spent where they
are needed most. The rest of the cycle supports effective
implementation.
Monitoring and Assessment determines the condition of the state's
ground and surface waters and informs future implementation actions.
The state's "watershed approach" systematically assesses the
condition of lakes and streams on a 10-year cycle. Groundwater
monitoring and assessment is more varied in space and time.
Water Resource Characterization and Problem Investigation delves
into the science to analyze and synthesize data so that key
interactions, stressors, and threats are understood. In this step,
watershed and groundwater models and maps are developed to help
inform strategies.
Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) and
Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) include
the development of strategies and high level plans, "packaged" at the
8-digit HUC scale (81 major watersheds in Minnesota). These
strategies identify priorities in each major watershed and inform local
planning.
The Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan is where
information comes together in a local commitment for prioritized,
targeted, and measurable action. Local priorities and knowledge are
used to refine the broad-scale WRAPS and other assessments into
locally based strategies for clean and sustainable water.
MN Department of Natural Resources MN Department of Health MN Pollution Control Agency MN Board of Water and Soil Resources
MN Department of Agriculture MN Public Facilities Authority Metropolitan Council
Comprehensive
Watershed
Management Plan
Agency
Water Resource
Characterization
& Problem Investigation
Monitoring &
Assessment
Restoration & Protection
Strategy Development
Ongoing Local
Implementation
DERMOT OF WW1. WINKS
MN Department of
Natural Resources
Appropriations and Public Waters
Permitting
Shoreland and floodplain
management
Technical assistance for projects
Funding for source water
protection, contaminants of
emerging concern
Metropolitan
Council
MET ROrOLI TAN C3J1C L
Technical assistance and
demonstration projects
Lake, stream, river monitoring:
flow, chemistry, biology
Effluent monitoring (WWTPs)
Impervious surface and land
cover assessments
Participate in review of local
water and watershed plans
(metro area); local water supply
plans; and comprehensive land
use plans (metro area)
Modeling and trend assessments
(surface water)
Pollutant load calculations
Groundwater mapping and
characterization
Participate in WRAPS and local
water planning teams
Master water supply plan
Groundwater management areas
(with DNR)
"war. ••••••••••••
:14:arail itecoure.
MN Board of Water
& Soil Resources
MN Department of
Health
Funding and technical assistance
for locally implemented
watershed restoration and
protection projects
Well sealing cost share
Monitor progress of local
implementation goals
Stream flow
Fish and plants (lakes)
Mercury in fish tissue
Aquifer levels (with Met Council)
Source water and finished
drinking water
Bacteria monitoring on Lake
Superior beaches
Conservation targeting tools
(e.g,., Environmental Benefits
Index)
BMP guidance (e.g., drainage
water management)
Stream hydrology and
geomorphology (support MPCA)
Small scale watershed modeling
and groundwater level modeling
County Geologic Atlas
Guidance for contaminants of
emerging concern
Data analysis and modeling to
support WHPA delineation and
vulnerability assessments for
public water supplies
Participate on interagency
watershed teams developing
WRAPS (with all agencies)
Advise on conservation actions
based on holistic view of
watershed health (hydrology,
geomorphology, connectivity,
biology, water quality)
Source water protection planning
(identification of problems,
issues, and opportunities)
Well construction management
Comprehensive Watershed
Management Planning (One
Watershed, One Plan)
Local water and watershed plans
Input on local conservation
actions informed by statewide
plans for prairies, forests, etc.
Water supply planning and
groundwater management areas
(with Met Council)
Guidance for infiltration in
DWSMAs
Source water protection planning
(local measures and strategies)
MN Public Loans and grants for water infrastructure projects based on priorities set by MDH and PCA Facilities Authority
NPDES permit programs, SSTS
compliance
Grants for Clean Water
Partnership, Great Lakes
Restoration, stormwater and
wastewater treatment (PFA)
Ag BMP loans
MN Agricultural Water Quality
Certification Program
Implement Pesticide and
Nitrogen Fertilizer Management
Plans
Water chemistry (surface and
groundwater)
Fish and macroinvertebrates
(streams)
Surface water assessment grants
Pesticides in surface and
groundwater
Nitrate in groundwater
Stressor Identification for
biological impairments
Watershed Modeling (8-HUC)
TMDLs
Civic engagement
Research/evaluation on ag
sources, practices and solutions
Technical assistance on ag
sources and practices, BMP
demonstration/evaluation sites
Stressor ID for pesticides
Stakeholder agreement on broad
watershed restoration and
protection strategies (WRAPS)
WRAPS report— includes
implementation table
TMDLs to EPA
Ag practices and management
options, nitrogen fertilizer and
pesticide use
Participate on interagency teams
developing WRAPS
Vegetative cover
Provide WRAPS for incorporation
into local plans
Input on management strategies
informed by statewide nutrient
plan
Input on management strategies
informed by pesticide and
nitrogen fertilizer management
plans
Minnesota
Pollution
Control
Agency
MN Pollution
Control Agency
MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OP
AGRICULTURE
MN Department of
Agriculture
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this information is available in alternative forms of communication upon request by calling 651-201-6000. TTY users can
call the Minnesota Relay Service at 711. The MDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider.
MDH
CCapital Improvement Plan
City of Edina, Minnesota Contact Jessica Wilson
2023 2028thru Department Engineering
Description
This CIP item includes development of the Clean Water Strategy as well as subsequent implementation of clean water activities for Lake Cornelia.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The strategy development is an investigation and planning effort which will result in a report. Implementation items will be defined through the
strategy development and environmental considerations will be determined as further defined improvements are scheduled.
Project #19-342
Justification
The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) sets out a framework for a detailed strategy to address clean water issues
in the City. The CWRMP defines Lake Cornelia as focus geography for the Clean Water Strategy.
Budget Impact/Other
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has set aside CIP dollars to address clean water issues in Lake Cornelia in the next few years. This item aligns
with their effort to leverage the investment. Infrastructure improvements will require ongoing operation and maintenance.
Useful LifeProject Name Clean Wtr Strat & Lake Cornelia Clean Water Proj Category Infrastructure
Type Replace or repair
Budget Goal
Total Project Cost:$1,600,000
Total2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Expenditures 2028
1,350,000600,000 750,000Planning and Design
600,000 750,000 1,350,000Total
Total2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Funding Sources 2028
1,350,000600,000 750,000Utility Fund: Storm
600,000 750,000 1,350,000Total
65
CCapital Improvement Plan
City of Edina, Minnesota Contact Jessica Wilson
2023 2028thru Department Engineering
Description
A major update to the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) is required to incorporate the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy
(CIP item 19-341) and Clean Water Strategy (CIP item 19-342). The Flood Risk Reduction Strategy and corresponding major amendment are
complete. This CIP item in 2024 would be for the Clean Water Strategy piece
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This would incorporate the aforementioned strategies into the existing CWRMP.
Project #19-346
Justification
The CWRMP lays out a framework for developing the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy and Clean Water Strategy. These would be considered major
amendments to the plan.
Budget Impact/Other
Some grant funding sources, such as the Clean Water Fund, may require implementation items to be included in an approved plan such as the
CWRMP.
Useful LifeProject Name CWRMP Major Amendment and Model Update Category Infrastructure
Type Replace or repair
Budget Goal
Total Project Cost:$167,000
Total2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Expenditures 2028
167,000167,000Planning and Design
167,000 167,000Total
Total2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Funding Sources 2028
167,000167,000Utility Fund: Storm
167,000 167,000Total
66
Agenda
City Council Work Session
City of Edina, Minnesota
City Hall Community Meeting Room
Tuesday, August 15, 2023
5:30 PM
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and
Priorities Discussion
IV. Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public
process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli)cation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: August 15, 2023 Agenda Item #: III.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Reports / Recommendation
From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and
Goals) and Priorities Discussion
Discussion
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None; discussion only.
INTRODUCTION:
The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan included a commitment to develop the Clean
Water Strategy to define clean water goals, the cost and pace of achievement, and plan implementation
opportunities. Establishing a vision for clean water in phase 2 would define the goal, set the priority, define the
service levels, and put us on a track to move toward a more sustainable management paradigm in which the
service that the City provides more closely aligns with what the community values.
The purpose of this work session is to provide a summary of the engagement process, describe how input has
shaped the vision and priorities so far, and get policy direction on the clean water vision (values and goals),
priority waterbodies, and priority pollutants from the Council ahead of a formal recommendation and future
Council action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Descr ipt ion
Staff Report: Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision and Priorities Discussion
Staff Report Attachment
Engagement Report
Staff Report
Engagement Report Appendix
Staff Presentation
Arrow Lake Summary
Centennial Lake Summary
Hawkes Lake Summary
Indianhead Lake Summary
Lake Cornelia Summary
Lake Edina Summary
Lake Harvey Summary
Lake Highlands Summary
Lake Nancy Summary
Lake Pamela Summary
Melody Lake Summary
Mirror Lake Summary
SW Pond Summary
August 15th, 2023
Mayor and City Council
Jessica Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Manager
Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and Priorities Discussion
Information / Background:
The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan included a commitment to develop the Clean
Water Strategy to define clean water goals, the cost and pace of achievement, and plan implementation
opportunities. Establishing a vision for clean water would define the goal, set the priority, define the service
levels, and put us on a track to move toward a more sustainable management paradigm in which the service
that the City provides more closely aligns with what the community values.
We’ve taken a phased approach to development of the Clean Water Strategy.
Phase I (complete): Current State of Edina’s Program
Staff reports are available from the August 3, 2022, work session and December 20, 2022,
City Council meeting, linked at the end of this report. Lake summaries and fact sheets can
be found in the online Water Resources Library and on the project webpage,
www.bettertogetheredina.org/clean-water-strategy.
Phase 2 (current): Vision (Values and Goals), Priorities
Phase 3 (future): Detailed management plans for priority waterbodies, including a pilot effort at Lake
Cornelia or other lakes as a later step, after buy-in on the policy level.
The purpose of this work session is to provide a summary of the engagement process, describe how input
has shaped the vision and priorities so far, get policy direction on the clean water vision (values and goals),
priority waterbodies, and priority pollutants, and get feedback on a proposed phase 3 scope from the
Council ahead of a formal recommendation and future Council action.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
The Decision to be Made
All of the more than 200 waterbodies in Edina are considered shallow. The deepest lake, Mirror Lake, is
about 15 ft deep at its maximum depth. Shallow lakes behave differently than deep lakes. Especially in urban
settings, small shallow lakes tend to be warmer, more nutrient rich, and more prolific with aquatic plants
and algae. The forces of urbanization and climate change have outsized influence on small aquatic
ecosystems. Urbanization has permanently and significantly altered Edina’s landscape. Climate change has
already and will continue to stress these systems.
Shallow lakes can exist in two states – clear or turbid. In the clear condition, diverse, native plant
communities help to control excess nutrients and provide valuable habitat. Turbid lakes have excess algae
and suspended sediment that limits the growth of aquatic plants and the benefits they provide.
Unfortunately, it can be difficult to restore a turbid lake to a clear-water condition due to the complex
ecology within these systems.
Figure from Clean Water Vision public meeting board
Minnesotans take great pride in our more than 10,000 lakes and it’s common for people to want all lakes to
be all things – deep, pristine clear water like on the north shore, and also open water views without any
‘weeds’ and recreation unimpeded by plants. The paradox of shallow lakes is that to have a clean and healthy
lake, we must encourage the shallow lake ecology which makes it unsuitable for most recreation and
challenges our notion of a conventional lake aesthetic. Recreation and clean water services can directly
compete. Managers cannot realistically deliver a shallow lake with a sandy bottom, no plants, and clear
water.
Given the brutal reality of the past and present forces disrupting aquatic ecosystems and the dichotomy of
the clear and turbid water states, what do we envision for a clean water future in Edina?
STAFF REPORT Page 3
Potential policy directions
Clean Water Status Quo
Shallow lakes would be managed for an outcome
which prioritizes wildlife habitat and natural
aesthetic views over boating and swimming. Native
rooted, floating, and emergent aquatic vegetation
would be encouraged for their ability to support
wildlife and sequester nutrients that would
otherwise be available for algae to grow.
Shallow lakes are managed for an outcome that
prioritizes open water views and recreation access
unimpeded by aquatic plants and algae.
Tradeoffs: Boating and swimming are inhibited by
vegetation. Aquatic plants can be seen above, at,
and just below the water surface.
Tradeoffs: Chemical control of emergent, floating,
and submerged plants will supply phosphorus to
opportunistic algae including potentially harmful
blue-green algae, contributing to recurring blooms.
Oxygen levels in the lake crash due to the decay of
organic matter and anerobic decay leads to swampy
smells. The fishery suffers from low dissolved
oxygen, lack of food, and lack of habitat. Only the
lowest quality aquatic animals are found.
Significant effort is needed to achieve and sustain
this outcome. We understand our lakes never
existed like they do now and that we get the exact
water quality we deserve. City actions either work
toward a new equilibrium or against it. We look for
smart and light-touch ways to continue to nudge
the waterbodies toward or keep them in their new
equilibrium.
This policy direction is supported by staff.
Significant effort is needed to attempt to balance
between the competing values of the clear water
state and open water views with recreation access
unimpeded by aquatic plants and algae.
Waterbodies in the clear water condition will fail
to meet resident expectations for boating and open
water views. Waterbodies in the turbid water
condition will fail to meet regulatory clean water
benchmarks. Balancing in the middle between the
clear water and turbid water state is not a practical
option. City actions and community values are
often misaligned.
Values and Goals
The following values and goals were framed based on what we already know about community values based
on established budget pillars, city values, quality of life surveys, and regulatory and stakeholder requirements.
These were further refined based on public feedback received so far. The text of the goals was simplified,
and the systems approach idea was added under the value statement about city actions.
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Ecosystems are in a healthy equilibrium; water is clear and environmental benefits are
sustained.
Water clarity improves as people use water friendly practices.
Waters are safe for human contact.
Waters support native plants, insects, and animals consistent with an urban setting.
Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for wildlife consistent with urban lands.
City actions align to do the most good towards measurable, desirable clean water
outcomes leveraging creativity and innovation.
The city uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’ model to make progress.
The city uses a systems approach in its implementation to consider cumulative benefits.
The city performs active management to improve or maintain water clarity and chemistry at
levels appropriate for urban waters.
Pollution is managed towards achieving water resource conditions that meet standards and
support community uses.
In-lake management practices are applied towards achieving conditions that meet standards
and support community uses.
Clean water goals are pursued with consideration for multiple benefits and available
resources.
People are connected to the land and water in reciprocity, both caring for nature and
enjoying the benefits of a healthy environment.
People access and interpret knowledge and guidance on urban clean water goals and
behaviors that promote them.
People pursue activities that promote clean water and natural resource stewardship.
Waters are restored or maintained in conditions allowing for beneficial uses.
All people have access to water and the cultural values and environmental benefits they
provide.
Clean water actions prioritize waters with public access.
Clean water strategies recognize the diverse ways people value and experience the city’s
waters.
The Clean Water Strategy Decision
Two potential clean water strategies are offered here, informed by the policy direction decision-to-be-made,
values and goals described above.
We work toward a healthy ecosystem
equilibrium in which waters are clear, safe,
and accessible.
We control vegetation to promote aquatic
recreation and open water views.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their
source and implement programs to help people do
their part.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their
source and implement programs to help people do
their part.
STAFF REPORT Page 5
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain
infrastructure and implement programs to capture
and remove pollutants.
Restore ecological processes: We restore natural
ecosystems on land and in water.
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain
infrastructure and implement programs to capture
and remove pollutants.
Control aquatic vegetation: We control vegetation
above, at, and below the surface.
Priority waterbodies
The current Water Resources Management Plan lacks a clear goal for achieving clean water outcomes.
The lake and pond policy in the Water Resources Management Plan was established in 2015 to provide a
clear, consistent process for responding to requests for algae and/or aquatic vegetation control. The
purpose of establishing the policy was to formalize how the city had been operating for decades.
Prioritization for the 2015 lake and pond policy is based on size, water quality, engagement, and public
access. The lake and pond policy has the city coordinate destruction of native aquatic vegetation even
though we know healthy native aquatic plant communities are an important part of a healthy shallow lake.
This is confusing for people as we say it’s important to protect native aquatic plants for clean water, then
help people destroy native aquatic plant communities under the umbrella of a water resources management
plan. A process for responding to requests for aquatic vegetation control is far from a plan for transitioning
waterbodies to a clean water state. There is no movement on water quality with the current policy and plan.
Developing a framework for prioritizing waterbodies helps focus the implementation of clean water services.
The draft prioritization criteria and factors were framed around community values and goals.
Criteria for priority waterbodies is based on resource condition (water quality, aquatic invasive species, and
public health), physical/geographic characteristics, and public use and access.
The draft prioritization factors and considerations for ranking are provided below.
50%
20%
30%
Prioritization composition
Resource Condition (WQ/AIS/Public Health)
Physical/Geographic
Public Use/Access
STAFF REPORT Page 6
An initial (now former) prioritization list was shared at the June 2023 community meetings. This list can be
viewed in the materials of the project webpage which are also attached to the engagement report.
Table from draft Priority Waterbodies public meeting board (June 2023)
The 13 lakes and ponds in the initial draft prioritization were those for which summary sheets were created
in phase 1 of the clean water strategy. Minnehaha Creek, Nine Mile Creek – north branch, and Nine Mile
Creek – south branch were incorporated into the prioritization during development of engagement
materials. Since the June engagement meetings, another sample of 6 natural waterbodies have been run
through the prioritization criteria and are shown in the table below (Mud Lake/Bredesen Park, Swimming
Pool Pond, Point of France Pond, West Garrison Pond, Birchcrest Pond, and View Lane/Vernon Ave pond).
We have not gone through the process to rank all waterbodies in the community.
Some waterbodies have moved within the priority tiers as more waterbodies were evaluated and feedback
on the criteria was incorporated.
Presence of harmful algal blooms was included in the original prioritization criteria. Potential for human or
pet contact with harmful algal blooms has been added. We chose not to prioritize waterbodies based on
proximity or drainage connections because the conditions under which water moves from one body to
STAFF REPORT Page 7
another are complex and many waterbodies across the city are connected. Further, prioritizing waterbodies
based on connection would elevate so many waterbodies that it becomes a poor criterion for differentiating
waterbodies. Flow routing diagrams for two drainage areas are attached as examples showing the extent of
waterbody connections. Instead, we’ve added a goal related to systems approach and cumulative benefits
underneath the ‘city actions’ value statement and can consider connections when formulating capital
projects and programs and priority waterbodies.
The revised tiering based on Council and community feedback received so far are as follows:
Highest Priority Tier 2 Tier 3
Lake Cornelia
Lake Edina
Minnehaha Creek
Nine Mile Creek – North Fork
Arrowhead Lake
Highland Lake
Indianhead Lake
Lake Nancy
Melody Lake
Mirror Lake
Otto Pond
Lake Pamela
Mud Lake/Bredesen Park
Nine Mile Creek – South Fork
Point of France Pond
Southwest Ponds
Swimming Pool Pond
Non-priority
Birchcrest Pond
Hawkes Lake
Lake Harvey
Vernon Ave/View Lane Pond
West Garrison Pond
We will focus our primary effort on highest priority waterbodies, build on our successes, and learn from our
failures. Low and non-priority waterbodies would receive a lower tier of service.
Priority pollutants
We heard good consensus from people on the priority pollutants; nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen),
sediment, and chloride.
We will focus our primary effort on these priority pollutants and observe non-priority pollutants and trends
in partnership with local watershed districts and state agencies.
Potential Phase 3 components and outcomes
Public participation plan for phase 3
A technical study (pilot at Lake Cornelia) including a breakdown of opportunity spaces where
pollutants are coming from (the upstream watershed, upstream waterbodies, in-lake sources), and
the costs and relative benefit of actions within those spaces. This would clarify which actions make
the most sense to pursue so that we are making wise investments to meet the goals in the most
efficient manner. It would also clarify the level and pace of achievement we might expect to see. We
would leverage existing studies as part of this work.
A recommendation for defined levels of service, taken through an asset management approach,
driven by community values and goals.
STAFF REPORT Page 8
A recommendation for resourcing a proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
A schedule and process for accountability in implementing the proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
Tools for communicating the Clean Water Strategy (to be pursued as part of updating the Water
Resources Management Plan).
Pending Council direction, staff would seek a phase 3 professional services scope for Council consideration
at a future meeting. The outcome of this work would likely lead to a major amendment to the Water
Resources Management Plan.
Key Questions and Discussion
What is your reaction to the potential policy directions for the vision and ultimately, the strategy?
What more do you need to be able to decide?
What is your reaction to the waterbodies prioritization framework? What more do you need to be
able to decide?
What is your reaction to the priority pollutants? What more do you need to be able to decide?
What other questions would you like answered in phase 3? What level of public engagement would
you like to see in phase 3?
What else are you hearing from the community about the Clean Water Strategy?
Next Steps
Staff will incorporate Council input and make a formal recommendation at a subsequent meeting. City
Council will decide on the policy. Staff could bring a phase 3 scope for Council consideration based on
direction from the work session.
Attachments
Example flow routing diagrams, Lake Cornelia/Lake Edina Subwatershed and Nine Mile Creek
(North) Subwatershed
Links to past conversations on this topic
May 16, 2023 - Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and Priorities Update
December 20, 2022 – Request for Purchase: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Phase 2 and
Participation Plan
August 3, 2022 – Work Session – Clean Water Strategy Summary
March 5, 2019 – Work Session – Water Resources Management – Morningside Neighborhood Flood Risk
Reduction Strategy, Lake Cornelia Clean Water Strategy, and Chloride Pollution Prevention
September 5, 2018 – Adoption of 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
April 3, 2018 – Work Session – Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – Implementation
Discussion
January 17, 2018 – Authorize Staff to Submit Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan for
Agency Review
November 21, 2017 – Work Session – Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
Presentation for Review and Comment
Lake Cornelia(North)
Lake Cornelia(South)
OttoLake
SwimPoolPond Point ofFrancePond
PamelaLake
LakeEdina
BirchcrestPond
CentennialLakes
Nine Mil
e
C
r
e
e
k
LakeNancy
RichfieldRichfield
MinneapolisMinneapolis
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.4.1, 2017-09-21 08:24 File: \\barr.com\gis\Client\Edina\Projects\CRWMP_Update_2017\Maps\Reports\Figures_CityReviewDraft\Fig_7_4_Lk_Cornelia_Water_Quality.mxd User: rcs2LAKE CORNELIA/LAKE EDINASUBWATERSHED ROUTINGBased on Water ResourceManagement PlanCity of Edina, Minnesota
FIGURE A.4.1
1,200 0 1,200Feet
!;N
400 0 400Meters
*Subwatersheds based on City P8 water quality model. Flow directions are general and do not reflect pipe/channel routing.
Imagery Source: USDA 2016 NAIP via MnGeo
Minor Subwatersheds (p8 model)
Lake/Pond
Creek/Stream
Flow Direction (general)
City of Edina Boundary
BirchcrestPond
HawkesLake
MudLake
MirrorLake
HighlandsLake
MelodyLake
Nine
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
PrescottPond
Eden PrairieEden Prairie
HopkinsHopkins
MinnetonkaMinnetonka
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.9.1, 2023-07-18 09:27 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Clean_Water_Strategy_23271913\Users\SGW\Cornelia_Flow_Routing_07172023.mxd User: sgwNINE MILE CREEK (NORTH)SUBWATERSHED ROUTINGBased on Water ResourceManagement PlanCity of Edina, Minnesota
FIGURE A.4.1
1,200 0 1,200Feet
!;N
400 0 400Meters
*Subwatersheds based on City P8 water quality model. Flow directions are general and do not reflect pipe/channel routing.
Imagery Source: USDA 2016 NAIP via MnGeo
Nine Mile Creek - North
Drainage Basin
Minor Subwatersheds (p8 model)
Flow Direction (general)
Lake/Pond
Creek/Stream
City of Edina Boundary
August 15th, 2023
CITY COUNCIL
Jessica Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Manager
Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Engagement Report
Information / Background:
Community engagement with this phase followed the City Council approved public participation plan
(attached). Per the participation plan, staff outlined initial vision themes (values and goals), and priorities for
public input. These materials are available on the project webpage and provided as an attachment.
Staff previewed the Clean Water Strategy engagement elements at the Council’s May 16th meeting. The key
takeaways from members of Council were 1) In addition to input from people who live directly adjacent to a
waterbody, get input from the broader community and 2) Prioritize health and safety, especially related to
harmful algal blooms.
The level of public participation for this phase of the project was ‘Involve’. The goal was to work directly
with the public throughout the process to ensure the public concerns and aspirations are consistently
understood and considered. The promise made was to work with the public to ensure that concerns and
aspirations are directly reflected in the vision and goals developed and provide feedback on how public input
influenced the decision.
Staff received input through a variety of ways. A Better Together Edina project page,
www.bettertogetheredina.org/clean-water-strategy was launched in May 2023. Four community meetings
were held at the end of June at parks throughout the city. Staff estimates talking with 42 people at these
meetings, and about two dozen people reached out via email, phone or social media with input and reaction.
Here is a summary of the appendix to this report where Council can review the community voice in more
detail.
Engagement Summary Report
1. Public Participation Plan, approved December 20, 2022
STAFF REPORT Page 2
2. Initial (June 2023) Draft Vision (Values and Goals), Draft Priority Waterbodies, Draft
Priority Pollutants. People were invited to attend one of four meetings or to review and
comment on the materials at the project webpage.
3. Map of meeting locations as attachment.
4. Sample postcards that were mailed to more than 2400 homes.
5. A representative sample of emails received are attached.
6. Traffic for the project webpage and a summary of input received online is attached to this
staff report.
We heard a range of feedback related to values, prioritization, process, and implementation. Key takeaways
and themes from the community engagement report:
People value wildlife, health (of the waterbody), safety and wellness for people, all are able to access
for enjoyment, beauty, open water views, stewardship, and legacy. Non-motorized boating was
mentioned occasionally.
Concern about aquatic plant type and density. Most were about visual appearance of plants, and
many were negative. We heard people describe aquatic plants as “choking” lakes and ponds. We
heard a concern for algae (green, filamentous), cyanobacteria (often given the misnomer blue-green
algae), curlyleaf pondweed, purple loosestrife, lilypads, cattails, and duckweed.
Concern about waterbody depth. People were concerned about lakes filling in with sediment and
getting shallower over time.
The city should take a systems approach. The City should incorporate the connectedness of
waterbodies when establishing priority waterbodies.
Curiosity about what detailed management actions within various levels of service will look like
including what the level of service is for stormwater ponds.
Governance
o Emphasize transparency (including with regard to priorities, tradeoffs).
o The policies and programs should be outcome-based.
o Measure and report on performance.
o The strategy should be adequately funded.
Strategy
o Apply a one-water lens. Think about water conservation, protecting aquifers, connections to
stormwater management and flood risk reduction.
o Consider connections to land and how development and restoration of land impacts water
resources and soil health.
o Use technology and data in decision making.
Execution
o Strive for excellence in execution, for example, with erosion and sediment control
programs.
o Apply asset management principles. Define levels of service, costs, risks, and tradeoffs.
Engagement
STAFF REPORT Page 3
o People want to know how lake associations will be considered with the strategy.
o People want to know what they can do, what others can do, what opportunities are
available, how to navigate other agencies and make sense of water resources governance.
Requests and ideas for more communication, information, technical support, and
engagement.
August 15th, 2023
CITY COUNCIL
Jessica Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Manager
Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and Priorities Discussion
Information / Background:
The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan included a commitment to develop the Clean
Water Strategy to define clean water goals, the cost and pace of achievement, and plan implementation
opportunities. Establishing a vision for clean water would define the goal, set the priority, define the service
levels, and put us on a track to move toward a more sustainable management paradigm in which the service
that the City provides more closely aligns with what the community values.
We’ve taken a phased approach to development of the Clean Water Strategy.
• Phase I (complete): Current State of Edina’s Program
Staff reports are available from the August 3, 2022, work session and December 20, 2022,
City Council meeting, linked at the end of this report. Lake summaries and fact sheets can
be found in the online Water Resources Library and on the project webpage,
www.bettertogetheredina.org/clean-water-strategy.
• Phase 2 (current): Vision (Values and Goals), Priorities
• Phase 3 (future): Detailed management plans for priority waterbodies, including a pilot effort at Lake
Cornelia or other lakes as a later step, after buy-in on the policy level.
The purpose of this work session is to provide a summary of the engagement process, describe how input
has shaped the vision and priorities so far, get policy direction on the clean water vision (values and goals),
priority waterbodies, and priority pollutants, and get feedback on a proposed phase 3 scope from the
Council ahead of a formal recommendation and future Council action.
STAFF REPORT Page 2 The Decision to be Made
All of the more than 200 waterbodies in Edina are considered shallow. The deepest lake, Mirror Lake, is
about 15 ft deep at its maximum depth. Shallow lakes behave differently than deep lakes. Especially in urban
settings, small shallow lakes tend to be warmer, more nutrient rich, and more prolific with aquatic plants
and algae. The forces of urbanization and climate change have outsized influence on small aquatic
ecosystems. Urbanization has permanently and significantly altered Edina’s landscape. Climate change has
already and will continue to stress these systems.
Shallow lakes can exist in two states – clear or turbid. In the clear condition, diverse, native plant
communities help to control excess nutrients and provide valuable habitat. Turbid lakes have excess algae
and suspended sediment that limits the growth of aquatic plants and the benefits they provide.
Unfortunately, it can be difficult to restore a turbid lake to a clear-water condition due to the complex
ecology within these systems.
Figure from Clean Water Vision public meeting board
Minnesotans take great pride in our more than 10,000 lakes and it’s common for people to want all lakes to
be all things – deep, pristine clear water like on the north shore, and also open water views without any
‘weeds’ and recreation unimpeded by plants. The paradox of shallow lakes is that to have a clean and healthy
lake, we must encourage the shallow lake ecology which makes it unsuitable for most recreation and
challenges our notion of a conventional lake aesthetic. Recreation and clean water services can directly
compete. Managers cannot realistically deliver a shallow lake with a sandy bottom, no plants, and clear
water.
Given the brutal reality of the past and present forces disrupting aquatic ecosystems and the dichotomy of
the clear and turbid water states, what do we envision for a clean water future in Edina?
STAFF REPORT Page 3 Potential policy directions
Clean Water Status Quo
Shallow lakes would be managed for an outcome
which prioritizes wildlife habitat and natural
aesthetic views over boating and swimming. Native
rooted, floating, and emergent aquatic vegetation
would be encouraged for their ability to support
wildlife and sequester nutrients that would
otherwise be available for algae to grow.
Shallow lakes are managed for an outcome that
prioritizes open water views and recreation access
unimpeded by aquatic plants and algae.
Tradeoffs: Boating and swimming are inhibited by
vegetation. Aquatic plants can be seen above, at,
and just below the water surface.
Tradeoffs: Chemical control of emergent, floating,
and submerged plants will supply phosphorus to
opportunistic algae including potentially harmful
blue-green algae, contributing to recurring blooms.
Oxygen levels in the lake crash due to the decay of
organic matter and anerobic decay leads to swampy
smells. The fishery suffers from low dissolved
oxygen, lack of food, and lack of habitat. Only the
lowest quality aquatic animals are found.
Significant effort is needed to achieve and sustain
this outcome. We understand our lakes never
existed like they do now and that we get the exact
water quality we deserve. City actions either work
toward a new equilibrium or against it. We look for
smart and light-touch ways to continue to nudge
the waterbodies toward or keep them in their new
equilibrium.
This policy direction is supported by staff.
Significant effort is needed to attempt to balance
between the competing values of the clear water
state and open water views with recreation access
unimpeded by aquatic plants and algae.
Waterbodies in the clear water condition will fail
to meet resident expectations for boating and open
water views. Waterbodies in the turbid water
condition will fail to meet regulatory clean water
benchmarks. Balancing in the middle between the
clear water and turbid water state is not a practical
option. City actions and community values are
often misaligned.
Values and Goals
The following values and goals were framed based on what we already know about community values based
on established budget pillars, city values, quality of life surveys, and regulatory and stakeholder requirements.
These were further refined based on public feedback received so far. The text of the goals was simplified,
and the systems approach idea was added under the value statement about city actions.
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Ecosystems are in a healthy equilibrium; water is clear and environmental benefits are
sustained.
• Water clarity improves as people use water friendly practices.
• Waters are safe for human contact.
• Waters support native plants, insects, and animals consistent with an urban setting.
• Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for wildlife consistent with urban lands.
City actions align to do the most good towards measurable, desirable clean water
outcomes leveraging creativity and innovation.
• The city uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’ model to make progress.
• The city uses a systems approach in its implementation to consider cumulative benefits.
• The city performs active management to improve or maintain water clarity and chemistry at
levels appropriate for urban waters.
• Pollution is managed towards achieving water resource conditions that meet standards and
support community uses.
• In-lake management practices are applied towards achieving conditions that meet standards
and support community uses.
• Clean water goals are pursued with consideration for multiple benefits and available
resources.
People are connected to the land and water in reciprocity, both caring for nature and
enjoying the benefits of a healthy environment.
• People access and interpret knowledge and guidance on urban clean water goals and
behaviors that promote them.
• People pursue activities that promote clean water and natural resource stewardship.
• Waters are restored or maintained in conditions allowing for beneficial uses.
All people have access to water and the cultural values and environmental benefits they
provide.
• Clean water actions prioritize waters with public access.
• Clean water strategies recognize the diverse ways people value and experience the city’s
waters.
The Clean Water Strategy Decision
Two potential clean water strategies are offered here, informed by the policy direction decision-to-be-made,
values and goals described above.
We work toward a healthy ecosystem
equilibrium in which waters are clear, safe,
and accessible.
We control vegetation to promote aquatic
recreation and open water views.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their
source and implement programs to help people do
their part.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their
source and implement programs to help people do
their part.
STAFF REPORT Page 5
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain
infrastructure and implement programs to capture
and remove pollutants.
Restore ecological processes: We restore natural
ecosystems on land and in water.
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain
infrastructure and implement programs to capture
and remove pollutants.
Control aquatic vegetation: We control vegetation
above, at, and below the surface.
Priority waterbodies
The current Water Resources Management Plan lacks a clear goal for achieving clean water outcomes.
The lake and pond policy in the Water Resources Management Plan was established in 2015 to provide a
clear, consistent process for responding to requests for algae and/or aquatic vegetation control. The
purpose of establishing the policy was to formalize how the city had been operating for decades.
Prioritization for the 2015 lake and pond policy is based on size, water quality, engagement, and public
access. The lake and pond policy has the city coordinate destruction of native aquatic vegetation even
though we know healthy native aquatic plant communities are an important part of a healthy shallow lake.
This is confusing for people as we say it’s important to protect native aquatic plants for clean water, then
help people destroy native aquatic plant communities under the umbrella of a water resources management
plan. A process for responding to requests for aquatic vegetation control is far from a plan for transitioning
waterbodies to a clean water state. There is no movement on water quality with the current policy and plan.
Developing a framework for prioritizing waterbodies helps focus the implementation of clean water services.
The draft prioritization criteria and factors were framed around community values and goals.
Criteria for priority waterbodies is based on resource condition (water quality, aquatic invasive species, and
public health), physical/geographic characteristics, and public use and access.
The draft prioritization factors and considerations for ranking are provided below.
50%
20%
30%
Prioritization composition
Resource Condition (WQ/AIS/Public Health)
Physical/Geographic
Public Use/Access
STAFF REPORT Page 6
An initial (now former) prioritization list was shared at the June 2023 community meetings. This list can be
viewed in the materials of the project webpage which are also attached to the engagement report.
Table from draft Priority Waterbodies public meeting board (June 2023)
The 13 lakes and ponds in the initial draft prioritization were those for which summary sheets were created
in phase 1 of the clean water strategy. Minnehaha Creek, Nine Mile Creek – north branch, and Nine Mile
Creek – south branch were incorporated into the prioritization during development of engagement
materials. Since the June engagement meetings, another sample of 6 natural waterbodies have been run
through the prioritization criteria and are shown in the table below (Mud Lake/Bredesen Park, Swimming
Pool Pond, Point of France Pond, West Garrison Pond, Birchcrest Pond, and View Lane/Vernon Ave pond).
We have not gone through the process to rank all waterbodies in the community.
Some waterbodies have moved within the priority tiers as more waterbodies were evaluated and feedback
on the criteria was incorporated.
Presence of harmful algal blooms was included in the original prioritization criteria. Potential for human or
pet contact with harmful algal blooms has been added. We chose not to prioritize waterbodies based on
proximity or drainage connections because the conditions under which water moves from one body to
STAFF REPORT Page 7
another are complex and many waterbodies across the city are connected. Further, prioritizing waterbodies
based on connection would elevate so many waterbodies that it becomes a poor criterion for differentiating
waterbodies. Flow routing diagrams for two drainage areas are attached as examples showing the extent of
waterbody connections. Instead, we’ve added a goal related to systems approach and cumulative benefits
underneath the ‘city actions’ value statement and can consider connections when formulating capital
projects and programs and priority waterbodies.
The revised tiering based on Council and community feedback received so far are as follows:
Highest Priority Tier 2 Tier 3
Lake Cornelia
Lake Edina
Minnehaha Creek
Nine Mile Creek – North Fork
Arrowhead Lake
Highland Lake
Indianhead Lake
Lake Nancy
Melody Lake
Mirror Lake
Otto Pond
Lake Pamela
Mud Lake/Bredesen Park
Nine Mile Creek – South Fork
Point of France Pond
Southwest Ponds
Swimming Pool Pond
Non-priority
Birchcrest Pond
Hawkes Lake
Lake Harvey
Vernon Ave/View Lane Pond
West Garrison Pond
We will focus our primary effort on highest priority waterbodies, build on our successes, and learn from our
failures. Low and non-priority waterbodies would receive a lower tier of service. Priority pollutants
We heard good consensus from people on the priority pollutants; nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen),
sediment, and chloride.
We will focus our primary effort on these priority pollutants and observe non-priority pollutants and trends
in partnership with local watershed districts and state agencies. Potential Phase 3 components and outcomes
• Public participation plan for phase 3
• A technical study (pilot at Lake Cornelia) including a breakdown of opportunity spaces where
pollutants are coming from (the upstream watershed, upstream waterbodies, in-lake sources), and
the costs and relative benefit of actions within those spaces. This would clarify which actions make
the most sense to pursue so that we are making wise investments to meet the goals in the most
efficient manner. It would also clarify the level and pace of achievement we might expect to see. We
would leverage existing studies as part of this work.
• A recommendation for defined levels of service, taken through an asset management approach,
driven by community values and goals.
STAFF REPORT Page 8
• A recommendation for resourcing a proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
• A schedule and process for accountability in implementing the proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
• Tools for communicating the Clean Water Strategy (to be pursued as part of updating the Water
Resources Management Plan).
Pending Council direction, staff would seek a phase 3 professional services scope for Council consideration
at a future meeting. The outcome of this work would likely lead to a major amendment to the Water
Resources Management Plan. Key Questions and Discussion
• What is your reaction to the potential policy directions for the vision and ultimately, the strategy?
What more do you need to be able to decide?
• What is your reaction to the waterbodies prioritization framework? What more do you need to be
able to decide?
• What is your reaction to the priority pollutants? What more do you need to be able to decide?
• What other questions would you like answered in phase 3? What level of public engagement would
you like to see in phase 3?
• What else are you hearing from the community about the Clean Water Strategy?
Next Steps
Staff will incorporate Council input and make a formal recommendation at a subsequent meeting. City
Council will decide on the policy. Staff could bring a phase 3 scope for Council consideration based on
direction from the work session. Attachments
• Example flow routing diagrams, Lake Cornelia/Lake Edina Subwatershed and Nine Mile Creek
(North) Subwatershed
Links to past conversations on this topic
May 16, 2023 - Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values and Goals) and Priorities Update
December 20, 2022 – Request for Purchase: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Phase 2 and
Participation Plan
August 3, 2022 – Work Session – Clean Water Strategy Summary
March 5, 2019 – Work Session – Water Resources Management – Morningside Neighborhood Flood Risk
Reduction Strategy, Lake Cornelia Clean Water Strategy, and Chloride Pollution Prevention
September 5, 2018 – Adoption of 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
April 3, 2018 – Work Session – Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – Implementation
Discussion
January 17, 2018 – Authorize Staff to Submit Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan for
Agency Review
November 21, 2017 – Work Session – Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
Presentation for Review and Comment
PARTICIPATION PLAN I CLEAN WATER STRATEGY – VISION AND GOALS I CITY OF EDINA 1
PARTICIPATION PLAN
PROJECT: CLEAN WATER STRATEGY – VISION AND GOALS
DECISION TO BE MADE
-Establish the vision and goals for the Clean Water Strategy. This policy will drive the strategic approach
and priority waterbodies for achieving clean water outcomes in Edina.
-Staff will draft initial vision and goals, engage with stakeholders, react to input received, and make a
recommendation to City Council. City Council will decide. The outcome will likely lead to a major
amendment to the Water Resources Management Plan.
DECISIONS ALREADY MADE
-The Water Resources Management Plan identifies Lake Cornelia as a focus area for development of the Clean
Water Strategy. The vision and goals will be developed with a variety of waterbodies in mind. A potential
future phase 3 would focus on planning level actions for specific waterbodies.
PROJECT TIMELINE
-Development of draft vision and goals, and engagement materials, Q1 – Q2 2023
-Stakeholder meetings, Summer 2023
-City Council check-in, Summer 2023
-Staff recommendation to City Council, Fall 2023
STAKEHOLDERS
-Lake Nancy Lake Association
-Arrowhead Lake Association
-The Indianhead Lake Association
-Mill Pond Association
-Friends of Melody Lake
-Lake Cornelia Lake Group
-Energy and Environment Commission
-Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
-Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
-General public
DECISION CRITERIA
IN SCOPE
-Vision and goals -Priority waterbodies and pollutants
Approved December 20, 2022
PARTICIPATION PLAN I CLEAN WATER STRATEGY – VISION AND GOALS I CITY OF EDINA 2
OUT OF SCOPE
- Planning level actions for a specific waterbody
(policy decision must be made first)
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
- Cost
- Cost/benefit
- Pace of achievement
- Public awareness
- Parks Strategic Plan
- Climate Action Plan
- Sustainability goals
- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) General Permit
LEGAL OR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
- Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules
- Nine Mile Creek Watershed District rules
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources rules
- Watershed Plans
- Local Water Plan (Water Resources Management Plan)
- Edina Comprehensive Plan
PARTICIPATON LEVEL
INVOLVE
- Goal: To work directly with the public throughout the process to ensure the public concerns and
aspirations are consistently understood and considered.
- Promise: We will work with the public to ensure that concerns and aspirations are directly reflected in the
vision and goals developed and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision.
TECHNIQUES
- Better Together Edina platform
- Direct Mail
- Community Meetings
PARTICIPATION PLAN I CLEAN WATER STRATEGY – VISION AND GOALS I CITY OF EDINA 3
DECISION PROCESS
Objective Staff will share the initial
vision and goals as well as
detailed engagement
schedule to get Council
input before engaging
with the public.
Staff will present
initial vision and
goals and seek input.
Staff will refine vision
and goals based on
input. Staff will
describe how input
was used.
Staff will make a
recommendation to
City Council. City
Council decides.
Staff will
communicate the
decision to the public.
Staff will archive the
project and process
online. Anticipated Outcomes Council has input on
initial vision and goals
and understanding of
how stakeholders will be
engaged.
People have access
to information.
People have the
ability to provide
their input.
People have access
to information.
People know how
initial input was
used. People have
the ability to provide
their input.
The staff
recommendation is
influenced by
stakeholder input.
People know what
decision was made.
People can view the
information, process,
and decision on the
project webpage. Timeline Summer 2023 Summer 2023 Fall 2023 Fall 2023 Fall/Winter 2023
Close the
loop
Make a
decision
Refine
Vision and
Goals
Share
Initial
Vision and
Goals
Council
Update
We’d like your input:
Frequent algal blooms
High suspended sediment
A New Vision for Clean Water
Lakes within the City of
Edina are all considered
“shallow lakes”.
Turbid lakes have excess algae and suspended
sediment that limits the growth of aquatic plants
and the benefits they provide. Unfortunately,
it can be difficult to restore a turbid lake to
a clear-water condition due to the complex
ecology within these systems.
Shallow lakes typically exist in either
a clear-water state or turbid state. In the
clear-water condition, diverse, native plants
communities help to control excess nutrients
and provide valuable habitat.
Ecosystems are in a healthy
equilibrium; water is clear and
environment benefits are sustained.
• Water clarity improves as people use water
friendly practices.
• Waters are safe for human contact.
• Waters support native plants, insects, and
animals consistent with an urban setting.
• Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for
wildlife consistent with an urban landscape.
City actions align to do the most
good towards measurable, desirable
clean water outcomes leveraging
creativity and innovation.
• The City uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’
model to make progress.
• The City performs active management
to improve or maintain water clarity and
chemistry at levels appropriate for
urban waters.
• Pollution is managed towards achieving
water resource conditions that meet
standards and support community uses.
• In-lake management practices are applied
towards achieving conditions that meet
standards and support community uses.
• Clean water goals are pursued with
consideration for multiple benefits and
available resources.
People are connected to the land
and water in reciprocity, both
caring for nature and enjoying the
benefits of a healthy environment.
• People access and interpret knowledge
and guidance on urban clean water goals
and behaviors that promote them.
• People pursue activities that promote
clean water and natural resource
stewardship.
• Waters are restored or maintained in
conditions allowing for beneficial uses.
All people have access to water
and the cultural values and
environmental benefits they provide.
• Clean water actions prioritize waters with
public access.
• Clean water strategies recognize the
diverse ways people value and experience
the city’s waters.
3
2
1
What do you value most
about Edina’s lakes,
streams, and wetlands?
What adjustments are
needed to this draft vision
to reflect those values?
What positive impacts
do you expect from
this initiative?
Who might benefit?
What negative impacts
do you expect and
who’s impacted?
What does “clean water”
mean to you?
Clear Turbid
Numerous and diverse native plants
Healthy habitat for invertebrates and fish
vs.2 4
1
1
3
3
4
2
Waters in Edina are currently not healthy.
A new plan for achieving clean water is necessary
to incorporate the latest scientific knowledge
about urban waterbodies and to help us meet
community expectations by ensuring that our
waters are safe, accessible, and well-managed.
The city has developed initial vision themes
(values and goals) and is seeking input from
the community.
Why is the City developing
a Clean Water Strategy?
Learn more and
provide feedback
online at:
BetterTogetherEdina.org/
clean-water-strategy
3
1
2
How do you engage
with Edina’s lakes,
creeks, and wetlands?
What barriers and
access are being created
with this proposal?
What are the benefits or
trade-offs of the factors
and considerations being
proposed for the ranking
of waterbodies? What
other factors need to be
considered?
Who else needs to
share their experience
and perspective?
We’d like your input:
Learn more and
provide feedback
online at:
BetterTogetherEdina.org/
clean-water-strategy
• Waterbody condition and impairments
Poor water quality can limit or impair clean water benefits.
• Lake size or creek length (within the City limits)
• Watershed impervious cover
Impervious areas typically generate more stormwater
runoff and higher pollutant loading.
• Opportunities for outreach, engagement, or service
Opportunities for outreach and environmental stewardship
increase connections to nature.
• Public access and use
Waters with public access may be enjoyed by
a greater number of residents and visitors.
• Areas of relative disparity
Access to environmental benefits may be limited in
areas of socio-economic disadvantage or vulnerability.
• Harmful algal blooms
Some types of blue-green algae can contain toxins which
can be harmful if ingested.
• Aquatic invasive species (AIS)
Some invasive plants and fish negatively impact water
chemistry or other functions.
• Does the lake or stream have excess nutrients,
chloride, and/or sediment?
• Is it a natural waterbody greater than 1-acre in size? Is
the lake area greater than 10-acres or stream length
greater than 1-mile?
• Is the adjacent watershed greater than 30% impervious?
• Does the waterbody have public access or adjacent public
land use? Is there a lake association or similar organization?
Are there nearby schools or public institutions?
• Are there parks, trails, or other public spaces adjacent
to the waterbody?
• Is the waterbody located within or near an area of
disadvantage relative to access to transportation,
household income, and/or access to green space.
• Have harmful algal blooms been confirmed and/or
no contact warnings been issued? Have indicators of
harmful algal blooms been observed? Is there high
potential for contact by people and pets?
• Are aquatic invasive fish or plants that impact water
quality present? This includes curlyleaf pondweed,
goldfish, and/or carp.
Draft Prioritization Factors and
Considerations for Ranking
Public
Use and
Accessibility
Physical
Characteristics
Waterbody
Conditions
DRAF
T
Establishing Priority Waterbodies
There are over 200 waterbodies in Edina. The current approach is to treat them
all the same which spreads resources thin. It takes sustained effort and significant
resources to restore and protect a waterbody. The clean water vision would
prioritize waterbodies so that resources may be focused on meaningful activities to
achieve clean water outcomes. Tier 1 priority waterbodies would be actively managed
for transition to clean water. The remainder would be nonpriority waterbodies and
would receive a lower tier of service.
Priority Waterbodies
Lake
Cornelia
Southwest
Ponds
South Branch
Nine Mile Creek
Indianhead
Lake
Lake
Pamela
Otto Pond
Lake
Nancy
Harvey
Lake
Minnehaha
Creek
North Branch
Nine Mile Creek
Highlands
Lake
Hawkes
Lake
Melody
Lake
Mirror
Lake
Arrowhead
Lake
Lake Edina
100
169
62
Lake Harvey
Hawkes Lake
Lake Pamela
Lake Nancy Otto Pond
Nine Mile Creek
South Branch
Southwest Ponds
Highlands Lake
Mirror Lake
Indianhead Lake
Arrowhead Lake
Melody Lake
Lake Cornelia
Lake Edina
Minnehaha Creek
Nine Mile Creek
North Branch
Highest Priority Tier 2 Tier 3
Edina Clean Water Services and Priority Pollutants
Edina’s Approach for Moving Towards Clean Water
• Source control: Working to reduce pollutants
such as chloride, fertilizer, and pesticides at
the source and educating property owners on
source control practices.
• Keeping it clean: Street sweeping, regulating
erosion and sediment control at construction
sites, encouraging smart residential lawn care
and smart salting, and supporting the adopt-a-
drain program.
Prevent Pollution
• Infrastructure: Install practices to capture
and treat polluted stormwater runoff, inspect
and maintain assets to ensure proper function,
implement smart technology and innovative
solutions to maximize benefits.
• Illicit discharge detection and elimination:
Identify and mitigate illicit discharges to the
storm sewer system and waterbodies.
Mitigate Pollution
Edina Clean Water
Partnerships:
• Control invasive species: Control invasive
aquatic plants like curlyleaf pondweed and
remove invasive rough fish to restore
ecological processes.
• Control internal loading of phosphorus:
Utilize alum and iron to reduce the release of
nutrients from lake sediments.
• Land Management: Restore natural areas.
Restore Ecological Processes
2
3
1 What pollutants are
you concerned about?
Which clean water
services have you
observed to be most
beneficial to your
community and
the environment?
What actions can
you take to help
Edina reach its clean
water vision?
We’d like your input:
Eutrophication is the process by
which a body of water becomes
enriched in dissolved nutrients
(phosphorus and nitrogen)
that stimulate the growth of
aquatic plants and algae, usually
resulting in the depletion of
dissolved oxygen. The largest
sources of nutrients within Edina’s
waterbodies are stormwater
runoff and phosphorus that’s
accumulated and then released
from lake sediments.
Chloride is a common deicing chemical that
makes water more saline and can limit the ability
for freshwater plants and animals to survive and
reproduce. The primary source of chloride in
Edina’s waterbodies is deicing salts applied to roads,
sidewalks, and parking lots for winter maintenance.
Sediment is material that’s broken down by
processes of weathering and erosion and is carried
to waterbodies where it settles to the bottom.
Sediment clogs waterways and stormwater
systems, creates cloudy water, and transports
nutrients. The most common source of sediment
in urban settings is from construction activities.
Priority Pollutants
Chloride
Phosphorus and nitrogen Sediment
Learn more and
provide feedback
online at:
BetterTogetherEdina.org/
clean-water-strategy
Creek Valley
Elementary
Edina HighSchool
Valley View
Middle School
Countryside
Elementary
Highlands
Elementary
Normandale
Elementary
Concord
Elementary
South View
Middle
School
Cornelia
Elementary
Harvey Lake
Melody Lake
Lake
Cornelia
Mirror
Lake
Highland
Lake
Hawkes Lake
Arrowhead
Lake
Lake Edina
Indianhead
Lake
Lake Pamela
Southwest
Ponds
Otto
Pond
Lake
Nancy
West
Garrison
Mud Lake
Meadowbrook
Lake
Our Lady
of Grace
Lynn/Kipling
Inundation Area
(constructed)
Weber Pond
(constructed)
Centennial
Lakes(constructed)
Rabun Pond
(constructed)
W 50th St
Vernon
A
v
e
York AveSFrance Ave100
62
£¤169
£¤212
§¨¦494
Alden
Park
ArdenPark
Arneson
Acres Park
Braemar Park
Centennial
Lakes Park
Countryside
Park
FredRichardsPark
Yancey Park
Heights Park
Highlands
Park
Krahl Hill
Lewis
Park
Normandale
Park
PamelaPark
Rosland Park
Strachauer
Park
Walnut
Ridge Park
Weber
Field Park
Todd Park
BredesenPark
Van
Valkenburg
Park
SouthB ranc h Nin e M il e CreekNorth
B
ra
nch
NineMile
Creek
M inne hahaCree k
EDINA WATERBODIES AND
NOTABLE LANDMARKS
Edina Clean Water
Strategy
Barr Footer: ArcGISPro, 06/23/23 12:03 PM File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Clean_Water_Strategy_23271913\Maps\Public_Engagement_Boards\Public_Engagement_Boards.aprx Layout: Public Engagement User: EMA0 0.5 1
Miles
!;NMunicipal Boundary
Lake/Pond/Creek
Wetland
School Property
Parks
Braemar Golf Club HouseJune 29
Arden Park shelter buildingJune 27
Walnut Ridge Park shelter buildingJune 25
Rosland Park pavilionJune 26
We want to
hear from you!
Clean Water Strategy
The City of Edina is working on a plan called the Clean Water
Strategy to address issues with local lakes and creeks. The
waters in Edina are not healthy, so it’s important to come up
with a new plan that takes into account the latest scientific
knowledge about urban streams and shallow urban lakes. The
goal is to meet the expectations of the community by making
sure the water is safe, accessible and well-managed. The
Clean Water Strategy will establish the vision and goals for
clean water, setting the priority and policy direction that will
guide the City in achieving clean water outcomes. By defining
these goals and priorities, the City will be able to align its
services more closely with what the community values.
We’re seeking input on the clean water vision (community
values and goals), priority pollutants and priority waterbodies.
Join us to share your thoughts!
• 3-5 p.m. Sunday, June 25, at Walnut Ridge
Park shelter building
• 10 a.m.-noon Monday, June 26, at Rosland
Park pavilion
• 6-8 p.m. Tuesday, June 27, at Arden Park
shelter building
• 4-6 p.m. Thursday, June 29, at Braemar Golf
Course’s Hoyt and Blanchard meeting room
Can’t make it? Learn more and share your feedback online
at bettertogetheredina.org/clean-water-strategy.
Sample of emailed and social media input on the Clean Water Strategy
Hello, as I looked at your list of lakes to be addressed in the water quality project, I did not see anything
about the water catchment ponds on France Ave and Kipling Ave.
They are absolutely filthy! Gritty, oily and filled with substances that simply can't be good for anyone.
Even though this project is not yet completed, I have seen kids swimming in them, which seems like a
health concern.
Not to mention that they drain into the grain of lakes.
Please let me know what the city plans to do about water cleanup.
I am very glad to see the three initial vision themes in the Staff Report, especially the science-based
outcome focus, and asset management. Those one-page lake summaries on Better Together are
informative and a great outreach tool. I feel like learning about the science of shallow lakes is next on
the list.
The community values portion is trickier. I am thinking now of water’s foundational position on
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, and the disparity of how we act with (believe about) our water, yet
absolutely need it, clean and abundant. How do you get to the evolving beliefs of Edina residents? Does
the Quality of Life survey have questions that will provide targeted feedback on these new values and
goals? Get to the mis-conceptions? Especially the issues (rightly) identified under “Focus on outcomes at
the water resources”? I think abundant public outreach is needed for public opinion to get to the place it
needs to be for clean water.
Clearly stating that the City can’t fix everything, need priorities and priority water bodies, is a strong,
realistic, necessary message that should be sobering. Justifying where, and why, is great outreach
approach in addition to being practical and effective. The flip side of priorities, it residents becoming
more involved and less passive in clean water. Should that be a stated value?
As I read the list of draft themes I can see how the different water issues will fit in, especially chloride
which I am very glad to see included as one of three pollutants of concern.
My last comment is about value/goal of “People being connected to the land and water in reciprocity,
….” I am now thinking of Edina residents, guests, but also businesses within the city and the people
(property managers, applicators) employed by them. You know where I’m going; the many people
making decisions about Edina and Minnesota waters as part of their jobs. Can they be included in the’
people' of this vision? Try work has driven home how business and resident decisions both contribute to
water quality and believe ultimately we’ve got to have this issue resolved with chlorides in order to have
clean water.
if Edina were to resume weed management in lake Edina, the water would be fit for recreation again.
It is unpleasant to have the weed-choked body of water covered in unhealthy algae knowing that it does
not have to be so.
We had fish in Lake Edina but a few winters ago they ‘froze out’ all dead when the ice melted.
I’m not sure where Edina should take this but just trea�ng the surface algae is not addressing all the
challenges.
The other piece here is that Lake Edina has not been this way in the 20 years I have lived here- this weed
infesta�on represents a drama�c change from what was normal that curtails recrea�onal use of the lake
in summer�me and the surface does not move, even on a windy day- not normal.
I have lived on Lake Edina for 20 years, enjoying the opportunity for ska�ng, snow shoe and cross
country skiing.
We also have used the lake for canoeing, rowing, sailing, and paddle boa�ng.
Lake Edina helps our neighborhood to drain storm water out to the nine mile creek and is a safety valve
for sudden rain storms.(and by extension helps with Lake Cornelia) Is there a way to accomplish your
plans and preserve the open water in our city lakes?
I have lived on Hawkes Lake for over 20 years. It is a wonderful body of water that amazes me with its
resilience in the face of the many challenges it has faced over the years. The challenges are only
increasing as pointed out in your presentation to city council on May 16. So this is an important
undertaking and will be complex from a number of perspectives -- including internal departments like
Public Works and then of course the broader community, many of whom aren't aware or concerned that
they impact our bodies of water, especially if they don't engage much with them.
Watching your presentation, I saw a bit of the Initial framing of the themes and priorities but am
wondering if you can make it available to me so I can look it over in more detail?
As you are still working on your tiering of the Lakes, I would like to request that Hawkes Lake be paired
with Mirror Lake in the same tier. The storm sewer system pumps water from Mirror Lakes to Hawkes
Lake so they are in essence the same lake.
Thank you for holding the series of meetings on Edina’s Clean Water Strategy. Our lake group has
provided feedback on Better Together Edina. We have additional feedback that relates exclusively to
Lake Cornelia.
· We would like to be informed when and where measurements are taken for curly leaf pondweed.
We would also like to know what the results of the measurements are.
· Since there is no standard for when the lake should or should not be treated for curly leaf
pondweed we feel the lake should be treated regardless of the levels. This invasive species is never
going away. Not treating the lake has a negative impact on Lake Cornelia as well as the downstream
bodies of water.
· This year with NO treatment there are very visible mats of CLP floating throughout the lake. These
mats will die off soon and the decay of the CLP will again lead to elevated algae levels and possible toxic
algae blooms. We actually just got notice of unsafe levels of algae in the lake.
· Any beneficial aquatic plants allowed to grow in the absence of an herbicide are likely overtaken by
the CLP.
· Lake Cornelia is given a rating of D by the Minnesota DNR. This is an impaired waterbody.
Withholding herbicide treatment for CLP with the hope of allowing beneficial aquatic plants to take hold
is not a realistic desired outcome.
Project Report
30 January 2019 - 08 August 2023
Better Together Edina
Clean Water Strategy
Highlights
TOTAL VISITS
616
MAX VISITORS PER
DAY
24
NEW
REGISTRATI
ONS
9
ENGAGED
VISITORS
23
INFORMED
VISITORS
223
AWARE
VISITORS
363
Aware Participants 363
Aware Actions Performed Participants
Visited a Project or Tool Page 363
Informed Participants 223
Informed Actions Performed Participants
Viewed a video 0
Viewed a photo 0
Downloaded a document 151
Visited the Key Dates page 26
Visited an FAQ list Page 0
Visited Instagram Page 0
Visited Multiple Project Pages 171
Contributed to a tool (engaged)23
Engaged Participants 23
Engaged Actions Performed
Registered Unverified Anonymous
Contributed on Forums 22 0 0
Participated in Surveys 0 0 0
Contributed to Newsfeeds 0 0 0
Participated in Quick Polls 0 0 0
Posted on Guestbooks 0 0 0
Contributed to Stories 0 0 0
Asked Questions 2 0 0
Placed Pins on Places 0 0 0
Contributed to Ideas 5 0 0
Visitors Summary
Pageviews Visitors Visits
New Registrations
1 Apr '23 1 Jul '23
1k
2k
Tool Type
Engagement Tool Name Tool Status Visitors
Registered Unverified Anonymous
Contributors
Forum Topic DRAFT Clean Water Vision (values and goals)Published 43 16 0 0
Forum Topic DRAFT Priority Waterbodies Published 51 13 0 0
Forum Topic DRAFT Priority Pollutants Published 27 8 0 0
Newsfeed Clean Water Strategy Published 6 0 0 0
Newsfeed Review and Comment Published 3 0 0 0
Newsfeed May 16, 2023 video Published 2 0 0 0
Newsfeed "City seeks community input on clean water
strategy"Published 2 0 0 0
Newsfeed Save the Date Published 1 0 0 0
Newsfeed What we're working on now Published 1 0 0 0
Newsfeed The state of Edina's waters Published 0 0 0 0
Newsfeed Find your watershed Published 0 0 0 0
Qanda Clean Water Strategy Published 44 2 0 0
Ideas Clean Water Strategy Ideas Published 15 5 0 0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY
3
FORUM TOPICS
0
SURVEYS
8
NEWS FEEDS
0
QUICK POLLS
0
GUEST BOOKS
0
STORIES
1
Q&A S
0
PLACES
Page 2 of 20
Widget Type
Engagement Tool Name Visitors Views/Downloads
Document Lake_Cornelia_Summary.pdf 35 43
Document DRAFT Vision and Priorities for review_page 1 (JPG format)31 37
Document DRAFT Vision and Priorities for review_page 2 (JPG format)27 34
Document DRAFT Vision and Priorities for review (PDF)27 29
Document Arrowhead_Lake_Summary.pdf 25 33
Document Lake_Nancy_Summary.pdf 22 28
Document Lake_Edina_Summary.pdf 21 25
Document SW_Pond_Summary.pdf 19 21
Document Indianhead_Lake_Summary.pdf 19 28
Document DRAFT Vision and Priorities for review_page 3 (JPG format)17 19
Document Lake_Pamela_Summary.pdf 14 16
Document Lake_Harvey_Summary.pdf 13 17
Document Hawkes_Lake_Summary.pdf 13 17
Document Mirror_Lake_Summary.pdf 12 18
Document Melody_Lake_Summary.pdf 12 15
Document Public Participation Plan.pdf 11 11
Document Water Resources Management Plan 8 11
Document Lake_Highlands_Summary.pdf 6 8
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY
25
DOCUMENTS
0
PHOTOS
0
VIDEOS
0
FAQS
0
KEY DATES
Page 3 of 20
Widget Type
Engagement Tool Name Visitors Views/Downloads
Document Lake_Highlands_Summary.pdf 6 8
Document 1908 map of Edina waterbodies 4 4
Document Shallow Lakes 4 4
Document Dredging 4 4
Document Aquatic Vegetation 3 3
Document Harmful Algal Blooms 2 2
Document Aeration 2 2
Document MN DNR Curlyleaf pondweed factsheet 0 0
Key Dates Key Date 26 28
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY
Page 4 of 20
Visitors 27 Contributors 8 CONTRIBUTIONS 12
25 June 23
Marydalsin
AGREES
5
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
09 July 23
Constance
AGREES
2
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Priority Pollutants
Per street sweeping - seems the timing needs to be more aligned to the season rather t
han a preconceived calendar. I often marvel that the sweep seems to come right before
all the leaves fall.In addition to sweeping the street - we need to vacuum the sewers wh
ere many leaves build up in the drain -0 not just at street levelWe need a better way to
inform home owners that they are responsible for keeping leaves out of drains too - or
promote the ‘adoption’ of sewers a program run through the U or extensionVery few se
wers are adopted in Edina based on the map i reviewed.100% agree that construction
debris/dirt needs to be better managed.
On behalf of the Lake Nancy Lake Association, the Board offers this input to your relate
d questions… 1). Concerned pollutants: A). Impervious surface runoff. In essence, ev
eryone in Edina is a shoreline property owner in that all that impervious runoff flows int
o Edina’s waterbodies—from fertilizer, road salt, oil drips, construction dirt, lawn debris,
dog poo, and un-corralled leaves. B). Invasive species such as goldfish, carp, curly-lea
f pondweed and purple loosestrife. C). Internal loading and release of phosphorous. 2).
Clean water services most beneficial: We are very impressed by the new filtration syst
em at Rosland Park. If it proves successful, more please, especially to improve upstrea
m impacts into Edina’s impaired “Chain of Lakes” (all of those interconnected to the wa
tersheds such as Garrison Pond, Lake Nancy, Lake Cornelia, and Lake Edina which flo
w into Nine Mile Creek). 3). Actions we can take to help Edina reach its clean water vi
sion: A). Respond to this draft proposal advocating for a rewrite of the prioritization ran
king factors and considerations. B). Share our association concerns with other associa
tions, residents and elected officials. C). Continue to use our association as a springbo
ard for lake stewardship. D). Continue to be an engaged association exploring ways to
reach goals. Since we officially incorporated with the Secretary of State office, our me
mbers have adopted storm drains, attended educational presentations, added raingard
ens, one member became certified as a Master Water Steward, another member won
an award for his book, “The Wonder of Water…” Lake Nancy Lake Association memb
ers are concerned and involved. Please do not approve this draft of the plan (See our a
dditional concerns in “Draft Clean Water Vision” and “Draft Priority Waterbodies”).
Page 5 of 20
10 July 23
sue
AGREES
2
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Priority Pollutants
Chloride, found in the deicing salts used for winter maintenance, is appropriately listed
as a priority pollutant. I would add to the description that what sets chloride apart from
other pollutants and makes it so very problematic is its permanency in water -- it won’t
break down and realistically cannot be removed. 3/4 of all the salts used here in Edina
stay right here in Edina’s waters which are becoming increasingly salty and toxic to aq
uatic life (as explained in the section on priority pollutants). In addition to chloride dama
ge in water, as a taxpayer and consumer, I am also concerned about the damage to Ed
ina’s public and private infrastructure because of the corrosive power of salts. The only
solution to chloride pollution is source reduction - there is a viable, effective pathway fo
r source reduction through Smart Salting practices (as referenced in the section on prio
rity pollutants). I believe all ‘people’ who impact Edina’s waters by applying salts for wi
nter maintenance in Edina, not only the residents, but also the public and private proper
ty managers, owners, and applicators alike, should be held to the values and goals in t
he Vision.
Page 6 of 20
Visitors 51 Contributors 13 CONTRIBUTIONS 24
23 June 23
LanaPeterson
AGREES
6
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
29 June 23
Mark Sparano
AGREES
1
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
05 July 23
Stephanie Rasley
AGREES
3
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Priority Waterbodies
I understand the need to prioritize water bodies based on size and location. However,
our pond directly feeds into Lake Nancy, which feeds into Lake Cornelia. I am sure ther
e are many other examples like this. It seems a strategic initiative would consider thes
e connected water bodies to maximize efficiency and ensure that the smaller ponds tha
t feed into priority waters are healthy and serve as strong filters. Additionally, as someo
ne who lives on a non-priority pond, my impression has been you are either a priority or
non-existent in the eyes of the city. There are many neighbors who are passionate abo
ut clean water and battling invasive species but we are left to navigate it ourselves. For
us in tier 4+, what can we expect regarding education, cross-pollination of ideas, and u
pdates on how we still have a big role and opportunity? I think the rules and processes
are very vague- especially for those new to the city or who have not engaged in the civi
c process this way. How can the city partner with the DNR and 7 mile creek to create g
uides, grants, and information for the residents of the other 180 water bodies? Navigati
ng all three layers independently is overwhelming and a bridge needs to be made for r
esidents. This initiative cannot be a priority or nothing- there needs to be an articulation
of how tier 4 bodies will be served.Additionally, how will Lake associations in this model
work?
I agree with most of the items in the proposals. I wish the strategy had some dimensio
ning of costs versus benefits. The communication [mailers, websites, etc.] on this initia
tive was excellent.My one specific items relates to the Mill Pond within the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District. Over last few years, the water level has been very low. I kn
ow Edina does not control the water flow here. However, with low water levels in cree
k, the vegetation harvesting is adversely affected [water low equals weeds higher and
more of them] and some of the benefits in the overall strategy will not be attained.
The priority for my family is the health of any water body feeding into Lake Cornelia - so
Swimming Pool Pond and other connecting lakes, ponds, streams, and creeks.
Page 7 of 20
06 July 23
RWZ
AGREES
5
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Priority Waterbodies
The following response is a joint reply from the Lake Cornelia Lake Group board of dire
ctors. Our Lake Group is encouraged that the City is developing a Clean Water Strateg
y, as was promised in the 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Master Plan (CWR
MP). Poster board #1 “A New Vision for Clean Water”, as shared on BTE, is an admira
ble vision. Poster board #2 “Edina Clear Water Services and Priority Pollutants” and the
“prevent, mitigate, restore” approach does a good job of identifying the breadth of activi
ties around which strategies will need to be developed. Unfortunately, poster board #3
“Priority Waterbodies” misses the mark by a wide margin. In order of importance, the s
hortcomings of poster board #3, “Priority Waterbodies” and the associated priority matri
x, are as follows:A) There is no metric to account for the inter-connectedness of waterb
odies and the potential downstream impact of upstream waterbodies, regardless of thei
r size. This was the number one issue raised with Staff and Council in 2015 and 2016 f
ollowing the implementation of the 2014 priority matrix and was again raised during the
2018 CWRMP review. To have ignored the importance of inter-connected waterbodies,
again reflects a fundamental lack of understanding of the issue Edina’s waterbodies fa
ce and continues the ‘whack-a-mole’ approach rather than an integrated system-wide c
ommunity viewpoint.B) There is no metric that reflects the size of the watershed served
by the waterbody rather than simply the size of the water body itself. C) There is no met
ric that reflects the waterbody’s importance to the community’s storm water / flood man
agement. D) The matrix, as presented, assumes an equal weighting of all criteria on a
yes / no basis. All these issues are not equal. A graduated scoring system with meanin
gful differences needs to be put in place and a service level associated with each criteri
a. The weighting of each criteria is fundamental to being able to comment on whether t
he matrix does or does not meet community goals. At present, it does not. E) The matri
x should include a fourth category of water bodies, designated as “No Service Level”. T
he following comments address areas that deserve additional clarification within the “P
riority Waterbodies” poster board. Watershed impervious cover criteria: Which of Edina’
s 200 waterbodies meet the 30% impervious cover criteria? What is the percentage of
surrounding impervious coverage for the largest 20 water bodies? Opportunities for out
reach, engagement, or service criteria: How near is near? In our opinion “near” should
mean walking distance otherwise transportation is involved and then all water bodies a
re ‘near’. Public access and use criteria: What is the percentage of publicly owned shor
eline for the largest 20 water bodies? Areas of relative disparity criteria: What geograp
hic boundaries are currently characterized as areas of "relative disparity" and what wat
erbodies are in those areas? Commensurate with Lake Cornelia’s historical waterbody
ranking as Edina’s number one priority, three of the five directors attended three of the
four recent public meetings. Our comments are based on over 30 years’ experience tryi
ng to work towards a more inviting water resource for the greater community and water
shed. Respectfully, Lake Cornelia, Lake Group Directors: Joe Gryskiewicz, Larry Olson
, Ron Rasley, Rick Vining, Ralph Zickert
Page 8 of 20
09 July 23
Constance
AGREES
3
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Priority Waterbodies
STOP!!! Please DO NOT approve this clean water strategy draft with the proposed prio
rity ranking system. The Lake Nancy Lake Association Board is VERY concerned abou
t this section of the proposed draft strategy for several reasons including but not limited
to: 1). It is a huge departure from the current community-developed priority ranking ap
proved in 2015 and then updated in 2017 when new lake associations formed—associ
ations encouraged and supported by the city.2). Based upon the proposed draft factors
for prioritization and considerations, with the exception of acreage size, Lake Nancy m
eets nearly all of the criteria. Yet with a stroke of a pen, this proposal deprioritizes and
dismisses previously established guidelines. Further, Lake Nancy may be small in acre
age, but services a wider drainage area than a few other larger lakes. 3). The draft inc
orrectly states: “the current approach is to treat (all waterbodies in Edina) the same…”
Not true. There is a priority ranking in place (high/medium/low) which already ignores
many important smaller bodies that are connected to Edina’s Chain of Lakes. 4). Lake
Nancy is currently ranked a high priority for several critical factors including that it drain
s directly to an impaired waterbody—into Lake Cornelia (of Rosland Park with its public
amenities) which then drains into Lake Edina, also impaired, and all that flows into Nine
Mile Creek. With this new plan, the city would lower our lake ranking (and other lakes) t
o Tier 3 even though Nine Mile Creek Watershed studies in 2021 and 2022 indicated “
significant ‘internal loading’ (the release of phosphorus into the lake from bed sediment
). Some of this loading is assumed to come from goldfish and carp stirring up sediment
.” And, “…data shows Lake Nancy fails to meet the state's goals for water quality within
shallow lakes. Elevated total phosphorus levels promote algal growth, which reduces
water clarity.” 5). Inconsistency in how the “Draft Prioritization Factors and Consideratio
n for Ranking” are applied. Including: The draft places several larger lakes in a higher
priority even though they do not connect to the larger watershed nor do they have adja
cent public land. In contrast, Lake Nancy is placed in Tier 3, ignoring its interconnectio
n to Lake Cornelia, ignoring current study data, ignoring the upstream runoff from the g
reater neighborhoods, and ignoring the public access trail that allows Edina residents n
orth of highway 62 to safely connect to Rosland Park, the Aquatic Center and Lake Cor
nelia. The impact from public use pollutants (dog poo, littering, winter clearing), not to
mention the expected increase in path-usage when the new pedestrian bridge is constr
ucted in 2025, is a serious consideration ignored in this Tier 3 ranking. 6). Disregards
establishment of associations in the priority factors—it was the city that encouraged as
sociations not only to bring property owners together, but to build lake stewardship and
expand education efforts and community engagement. 7). In your proposal to “establis
h priorities,” you state, “…resources may be focused on meaningful activities to achieve
clean water outcomes.” This is too broad and vague, especially as the city is proposing
to lower rankings on waterbodies like Lake Nancy. 8). This statement is troubling: “Is th
e waterbody located within or near an area of disadvantage relative to access to transp
ortation, household income, and/or access to green space.” The waterbodies in Edina
were not “placed” in their locations based upon financial or other inequity/disadvantage
factors nor has Edina used that as a previous consideration in lake rankings. If the City
was so concerned about this, it would put a greater emphasis on treating Garrison Pon
d because it is adjacent to an affordable housing apartment complex that has no other
green space access. 9). If anything, the clean water strategy should look at ways to ex
pand service not limit to just Tier 1. Lake Nancy Lake Association members are conce
rned and involved. Please do not approve this draft of the plan (See our additional conc
erns in “Draft Clean Water Vision” and “Draft Priority Pollutants”).
Page 9 of 20
10 July 23
sue
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Priority Waterbodies
No city has unlimited resources so it’s a realistic to prioritize how resources will be dele
gated. I support the approach of justifying where and why resources will be spent base
d on measurable, science-based outcomes. The one-page lake summaries are very inf
ormative. Having lived in Edina for years, I’ve known mostly about Minnesota’s deep n
orthern lakes and little about Edina’s shallow lakes and waters. Will maps eventually sh
ow the interconnectedness of ponds, streams and lakes and their functions? Should so
me water bodies be thought of as utilitarian only?
Page 10 of 20
Visitors 43 Contributors 16 CONTRIBUTIONS 35
25 June 23
Marydalsin
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
26 June 23
LouannWaddick
AGREES
3
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
05 July 23
Stephanie Rasley
AGREES
7
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Clean Water Vision (values and goals)
I understand the concern about effort to improve turbid waters - but I think it would help
to know which waters we are considering as “clear’ and which are ‘turbid’. For example
I think all the water in the Fred are probably ‘turbid’ but i don’t think cleaning them woul
d be as difficult as larger water areas - so many of them are smaller and they have real
ly suffered from the golf course maintenance over decades and excess fertilizer use. M
any water fowl and turtles use these waters and they are also very unsighlty
I am very happy that Edina is pursuing a clean water strategy. One thing that I think it’s
missing is the major permanent pollutant, chloride. This pollutant affects all of the wate
rs in our two Watersheds.. we need a clear strategy on how to manage chloride.
My husband and I are in favor of the city pursuing a clean water policy. Thank you for h
osting the recent open house forums. Our values and goals:1. Communication. We w
ould like to be informed of what treatments are happening at which lakes, the rationale,
and the timing. If a decision is made to not treat a water body that has been regularly tr
eated in the past, we would like to be informed in a timely manner. 2. Lake Cornelia. A
nnual treatment for curly leaf pondweed throughout the entire lake. 3. We would like to
be able to put our hands in the lake water and have our dog walk or swim in Edina’s lak
es. Thank you.
Page 11 of 20
09 July 23
Constance
AGREES
8
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Clean Water Vision (values and goals)
Generally speaking the Lake Nancy Lake Association Board is pleased the city propos
es expanding the current Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) with a clean w
ater strategy. That said we have many concerns including about this process. The valu
es and goals proposed clearly demonstrate municipal viewpoints and bias and amend t
he current WRMP which is a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. A better process wo
uld have involved key stakeholders in creating the draft (perhaps a workgroup of the E
nergy and Environment Committee) BEFORE general community input followed by the
opportunity for public engagement expanded with much more promotion and longer le
ad times. Our input related to your values-goals questions: 1). What does “clean water”
mean to us? There was a time when long-standing residents fondly recall their children
safely swimming in the lake. Those may be bygone days, but how nice it would be if tod
ay we could dangle a foot over the dock, an arm over the edge of a kayak or even wad
e along the shoreline without fear of getting sick. We seek a balance between providin
g clean water habitats for the ecosystem AND aesthetic values among shoreline prope
rty owners. Regarding the latter point: For Edina properties designated as “lakeshore,”
home values are based upon living adjacent to a lake or pond and not swampy wetland
s thick with emergent and submerged aquatic plants and weeds. Admittedly we struggl
e with that balance: aeration could help with oxygenation and reducing phosphorous, b
ut that interferes with winter recreation; curly-leaf pondweed and invasive carp/goldfish
continue to infest our lake—are just a few challenges. But unless there are better optio
ns or more support from the city our association will continue to treat for submerged aq
uatic vegetation as do other lake associations in Edina. 2). What do we value most ab
out Edina’s lakes…? Adjustments needed to this draft to reflect those values? Edina’s l
akes and other waterbodies offer recreation (whether paddleboats, remote control hob
by boats, winter skating, or just walking along the serenity of a pond), quintessential Mi
nnesota landscape, and wildlife amenities to our otherwise impervious concrete jungle.
The primary adjustments needed to this draft: A). Needs to focus more on an “Edina C
hain of Lakes” approach which means no matter the size of the lake, it’s the impact on t
he interconnected system and relationship to the watershed that should be a priority. B)
. Lacks emphasis on upstream impacts. EVERYONE in Edina—residents, shoppers, w
orkers, drivers, visitors, etc.—leaves behind something directly or indirectly that ends u
p in Edina’s lakes whether it’s from runoff, ignoring storm drains, not picking-up dog po
o, or littering. C). Given this is a major update to the already approved comprehensive
plan, we expect there to be more opportunities for community engagement and public i
nput beyond this BT comment period and the meetings held during vacationing summ
er months. 3). What positive impacts do you expect from this initiative? More city resou
rces, especially city budget. If our city can find funding to support a one-season sport to
offer premium hockey then we should be able to allocate more funding to support this c
ritical and suffering natural resource. It is absolutely shameful that so many of Edina’s
waterbodies are impaired. Through community input, like ours, we hope the strategy wi
ll be less myopic focusing on individual lakes and more about the system we’ve coined
Edina Chain of Lakes. Who might benefit? All current and future residents of Edina an
d within the entire watershed. What negative impacts do you expect and who’s impact
ed? Negative: short-sighted focus on large waterbodies; inconsistent strategy with curr
ent lake rankings and proposed priority factors in how you plan to change the service le
vels; specific services to be added or discontinued are not available; the draft does not
include what type of solutions you propose for city-wide education to reduce upstream l
ake pollution; and fails to place priority on the interconnected lake system. Questions f
or staff: A). “Build, test, learn” model? Please explain what you mean by this model an
d how you would apply it to this plan. B). Impact of development, especially high densit
y residential and commercial, on clean water? There is no mention of the impact of the
city’s current development expansion and increase in impervious surface on clean wat
er. How can an updated clean water strategy include—perhaps demand—that large-sc
ale developments contribute to the goals with either a fee to help fund its density impac
t on the water system or mandated green space with new ponds (not just raingardens)
that benefit clean water and aesthetics? C). Shallow Lakes. How will Edina address th
e shallow lake syndrome so that in the long-term current lakes do not become swamps
? As indicated by your diagram, “lakes within the city of Edina are all considered ‘shall
ow lakes.’ So true. And we know that lower water levels are breeding grounds for algae
and both emergent and submerged aquatic growth. Lake Nancy Lake Association me
mbers are concerned and involved. Please do not approve this draft of the plan (See o
ur additional concerns in “Draft Priority Waterbodies” and “Draft Priority Pollutants”).
Page 12 of 20
10 July 23
sue
AGREES
3
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
10 July 23
Becky Thacher-Bell
AGREES
4
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
18 July 23
Bob Waldron
AGREES
2
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
20 July 23
Dr. Joe
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
FORUM TOPIC
DRAFT Clean Water Vision (values and goals)
I think a Clean Water Strategy is important for Edina and applaud this effort. Just from
reading the documents on this site I feel that I know much more about Edina’s waters,
for instance learning about the various shallow lakes. Please continue abundant outrea
ch with hyper-local data and progress updates on a regular basis. How are we doing?
To support what the City is doing, what do residents need to be doing more of? less of?
As you look into community values, and evolving beliefs of Edina residents, how will th
at be measured? Will you be using the Quality of Life survey? Does it have questions t
hat will provide feedback on these new values and goals? uncover misconceptions?
We are glad that Edina is looking at ways to address the lake water quality and work to
wards improvement. It is difficult to really understand the specific plan, however, and h
ow it will be implemented, how it will affect those of us on small ponds (we are on Lake
Otto). It doesn't make sense to not treat the chain of lakes that are connected. For exa
mple, Lake Nancy and lake Otto, part of the nine mile creek watershed, are tier 3 and w
ill not receive treatment. Since everything is connected, shouldn't all lakes in the waters
hed receive services? We hope this process can slow down so that people can underst
and the specifics. It's important that property owners know what impact these designati
ons will have and how they will affect property values and enjoyment of the wildlife aro
und all the waterbodies in Edina.
Like many, I applaud the work on a clean water strategy. Many of the goals and prioriti
es are clear, with likely refinement over time of actions needed by the city, actions need
ed by residents and joint actions needed. My comment for this forum is more about ex
ecution. In the past, the city hired a vendor to treat Lake Cornelia (and other water bod
ies) for curly weed. It is my understanding that they vendor was paid for two treatment
s but only executed one. This year, I personally watched a canoe paddle around Lake
Cornelia as part of the Curly Weed assessment. It is a vendor that was hired to assess
where treatments were needed. My personal experience was that the vendor did not a
ppear to stop for any survey work. Later, we hear that Lake Cornelia appears fine to th
e vendor, and therefore, not treatment was given. Curly Weed is now growing in Lake
Cornelia. Therefore, either the vendor was grossly wrong in how they conduct their wo
rk, negligent or fraudulent (taking the city's money without really performing the necess
ary work). I would strongly encourage the city look into training programs geared at ve
ndor management for the staff overseeing this work. That way, we can more accuratel
y execute on any strategy.
I agree with the comments below from Bob Waldron and with the comments set forth b
y the Cornelia Lake Group Board, of which I am a member.It seems we have to autom
atically treat BOTH basins of Lake Cornelia AUTOMATICALLY ANNUALLY for CLPW to
prevent the current gross surface growth and subsequent current neurotoxic blue algae
bloom.Respectfully, Joe Gryskiewicz, MD
Page 13 of 20
Visitors 44 Contributors 2 CONTRIBUTIONS 3
Q Constance
Please consider keeping this format open at least through the end of July, perhaps longer. Many residents are
currently on vacation and/or spending time at their cabins.
A Publicly Answered
People can submit questions, comments, and ideas on this phase of the project through at least the end of August. St
aff will prepare a staff report in early August for the City Council to discuss the Clean Water Strategy at their August 1
5th Work Session meeting. People can provide input up to and for a couple weeks after the work session. Staff will re
ceive City Council direction at the work session meeting and consider any other input from the public, then return to Ci
ty Council at a later meeting this fall (date to be determined) with a recommendation and to seek a formal decision fro
m the Council.
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
QANDA
Clean Water Strategy
03 July 23
Page 14 of 20
Q Constance
Please extend the comment period on this BT site. Many of our LNLA members are vacationing right now as are man
y other residents who should have a chance to respond. Given this is a MAJOR proposed change/update to the WR
MP of the comprehensive plan, the community/public engagement process needs to be robust and thorough. I was a
little surprised to learn the council approved the project at the end of 2022 yet the draft plan documents were only pos
ted on this site a few days before the public meetings. Please confirm how long residents can post comments and as
k questions via BT. Thank you.
A Publicly Answered
People can submit questions, comments, and ideas on this phase of the project through at least the end of August. St
aff will prepare a staff report in early August for the City Council to discuss the Clean Water Strategy at their August 1
5th Work Session meeting. People can provide input up to and for a couple weeks after the work session. Staff will re
ceive City Council direction at the work session meeting and consider any other input from the public, then return to Ci
ty Council at a later meeting this fall (date to be determined) with a recommendation and to seek a formal decision fro
m the Council. The scope of this phase of the project is to get clarity and consensus from the public and the Council o
n the vision (values and goals) and priorities. Once that is established, we can begin the work to define the service lev
el and what it takes to resource it.The Council has not yet considered or approved a Clean Water Strategy. So far, the
y have received a preview of the materials that were presented at the community meetings. The 2022 amendment to
the Water Resources Management Plan was to incorporate the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy work that started in 20
19. We expect this Clean Water Strategy to also result in a major amendment to the Water Resources Management P
lan when it is complete. You can follow along with that process on this project webpage.
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
QANDA
Clean Water Strategy
07 July 23
Page 15 of 20
Q RWZ
As it appears questions are taken down after they are posted and it is unclear what happens to them, the questions b
elow are being posted yet again. The following response is a joint reply from the Lake Cornelia Lake Group board of
directors. Our Lake Group is encouraged that the City is developing a Clean Water Strategy, as was promised in the 2
018 Comprehensive Water Resources Master Plan (CWRMP). The following comments address areas that deserve a
dditional clarification within the “Priority Waterbodies” poster board. Watershed impervious cover criteria Which of Edi
na’s 200 waterbodies meet the 30% impervious cover criteria? What is the percentage of surrounding impervious cov
erage for the largest 20 water bodies? Opportunities for outreach, engagement, or service criteria How near is near? I
n our opinion “near” should mean walking distance otherwise transportation is involved and then all water bodies are ‘
near’. Public access and use criteria What is the percentage of publicly owned shoreline for the largest 20 water bodie
s? Areas of relative disparity criteria What geographic boundaries are currently characterized as areas of "relative
disparity" and what waterbodies are in those areas? Commensurate with Lake Cornelia’s historical waterbody ranking
as Edina’s number one priority, three of the five directors attended three of the four recent public meetings. Our comm
ents are based on over 30 years’ experience trying to work towards a more inviting water resource for the greater co
mmunity and watershed. Respectfully, Lake Cornelia, Lake Group Directors: Joe Gryskiewicz, Larry Olson, Ron Rasle
y, Rick Vining, Ralph Zickert
A Publicly Answered
Questions: Watershed impervious cover criteria Which of Edina’s 200 waterbodies meet the 30% impervious cover cri
teria? What is the percentage of surrounding impervious coverage for the largest 20 water bodies? Answer: We evalu
ated the 16 waterbodies you see in the Draft prioritization so far. Nine Mile Creek – North Fork, Minnehaha Creek, Lak
e Cornelia, Lake Edina, Melody Lake, and Lake Pamela have >30% impervious directly connected based on major su
bwatershed. Nine Mile Creek – South Fork, Arrowhead Lake, Mirror Lake, Highlands Lake, Hawkes Lake, Indianhead
Lake, Lake Harvey, Otto Pond, Lake Nancy, and Southwest Ponds have <30% impervious directly connected based o
n major subwatershed. We plan to run another sample of waterbodies through the draft prioritization and will share th
e outcomes of that with the public.Question/Comment: Opportunities for outreach, engagement, or service criteria Ho
w near is near? In our opinion “near” should mean walking distance otherwise transportation is involved and then all w
ater bodies are ‘near’. Answer: This one isn’t related to proximity. We mean for it to be a space for a community group
to gather around or engage with. Some examples could be, a lake association, a scout troop or faith group service pr
oject, or a school or faith group water/nature educational visit. Question: Public access and use criteria What is the p
ercentage of publicly owned shoreline for the largest 20 water bodies? Answer: We evaluated the 16 waterbodies you
see in the Draft prioritization so far. Nine Mile Creek – North Fork, Minnehaha Creek, Lake Cornelia, Highlands Lake,
Melody Lake, and Lake Pamela are within or directly adjacent to parks. Lake Edina, Otto Pond, and Lake Nancy are
adjacent to public trails. The other waterbodies in the initial prioritization draft are not within or adjacent to a park or tr
ail.Question: Areas of relative disparity criteria What geographic boundaries are currently characterized as areas of "r
elative disparity" and what waterbodies are in those areas?Answer: We used data from the Metropolitan Council’s Pla
ce-based Equity Research. We created heat map plots for the following parameters; median household income,
percent of households with no vehicle, percent of land use that is park/greenspace, and percent of land use that is mu
ltifamily residential. We compared the Met Council datasets with the Hennepin County Vulnerable Community data fro
m their Climate Action Plan, and the areas within Edina that scored most high were similar across the two. Nine Mile
Creek – North Fork, Lake Edina, Mirror Lake, and Highlands Lake are within or border an area of equity concern. The
other waterbodies in the initial prioritization are not within or bordering an area of equity concern.
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
QANDA
Clean Water Strategy
10 July 23
Page 16 of 20
Visitors 15 Contributors 5 CONTRIBUTIONS 15
06 July 23
RWZ
VOTES
1
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
IDEAS
Clean Water Strategy Ideas
The following response is a joint reply from the Lake
Cornelia Lake Group board of directors.
Page 17 of 20
10 July 23
RWZ
VOTES
0
10 July 23
sue
VOTES
2
10 July 23
sue
VOTES
2
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
IDEAS
Clean Water Strategy Ideas
Read the response from the Lake Cornelia Lake Gr
oup
The following response is a joint reply from the Lake Cornelia Lake Group board of dire
ctors. Our Lake Group is encouraged that the City is developing a Clean Water Strateg
y, as was promised in the 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Master Plan (CWR
MP). Poster board #1 “A New Vision for Clean Water”, as shared on BTE, is an admira
ble vision. Poster board #2 “Edina Clear Water Services and Priority Pollutants” and the
“prevent, mitigate, restore” approach does a good job of identifying the breadth of activi
ties around which strategies will need to be developed. Unfortunately, poster board #3
“Priority Waterbodies” misses the mark by a wide margin. In order of importance, the s
hortcomings of poster board #3, “Priority Waterbodies” and the associated priority matri
x, are as follows: A) There is no metric to account for the inter-connectedness of water
bodies and the potential downstream impact of upstream waterbodies, regardless of th
eir size. This was the number one issue raised with Staff and Council in 2015 and 2016
following the implementation of the 2014 priority matrix and was again raised during th
e 2018 CWRMP review. To have ignored the importance of inter-connected waterbodie
s, again reflects a fundamental lack of understanding of the issue Edina’s waterbodies
face and continues the ‘whack-a-mole’ approach rather than an integrated system-wide
community viewpoint. B) There is no metric that reflects the size of the watershed serv
ed by the waterbody rather than simply the size of the water body itself. C) There is no
metric that reflects the waterbody’s importance to the community’s stormwater / flood
management. D) The matrix, as presented, assumes an equal weighting of all criteria
on a yes / no basis. All these issues are not equal. A graduated scoring system with m
eaningful differences needs to be put in place and a service level associated with each
criteria. The weighting of each criteria is fundamental to being able to comment on whe
ther the matrix does or does not meet community goals. At present, it does not. E) The
matrix should include a fourth category of water bodies, designated as “No Service Lev
el”. The following comments address areas that deserve additional clarification within t
he “Priority Waterbodies” poster board. Watershed impervious cover criteria Which of E
dina’s 200 waterbodies meet the 30% impervious cover criteria? What is the percentag
e of surrounding impervious coverage for the largest 20 water bodies? Opportunities fo
r outreach, engagement, or service criteria How near is near? In our opinion “near” sho
uld mean walking distance otherwise transportation is involved and then all water bodi
es are ‘near’. Public access and use criteria What is the percentage of publicly owned s
horeline for the largest 20 water bodies? Areas of relative disparity criteria What geogr
aphic boundaries are currently characterized as areas of "relative disparity" and what w
aterbodies are in those areas? Commensurate with Lake Cornelia’s historical waterbod
y ranking as Edina’s number one priority, three of the five directors attended three of th
e four recent public meetings. Our comments are based on over 30 years’ experience t
rying to work towards a more inviting water resource for the greater community and wat
ershed. Respectfully, Lake Cornelia, Lake Group Directors: Joe Gryskiewicz, Larry Ols
on, Ron Rasley, Rick Vining, Ralph Zickert
Ordinance requiring salt applicators working in Edin
a be Smart Salt Certified.
Ordinance that excess deicing salts be swept up wit
hin 24 hours.
See Madison WI ordinance
Page 18 of 20
12 July 23
RWZ
VOTES
0
12 July 23
RWZ
VOTES
0
12 July 23
RWZ
VOTES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
IDEAS
Clean Water Strategy Ideas
Best Management Practices In the land of the blind,
the one-eyed man is King.
As noted by BARR Engineering in their Phase I memo presented in the August 3, 2022
City Council Work Session: “In an effort to understand what other cities are doing to ad
vance clean water, BARR reviewed readily available information on the clean water pro
grams and practices of four similarly-sized suburban cities, as identified and requested
by City staff.” Note that the cities were chosen by City Staff not Barr Engineering AND
based on city size. The cities chosen were Evanston, Illinois, Highland Park, Illinois, Ev
erett, Washington and Apple Valley, Minnesota. A) What does “SIZE OF THE CITY” ha
ve to do with the robustness of their clean water programs? and B) Evanston, Highland
Park, and Everett 1) appear to lack similar sized shallow lakes, 2) have very different cli
mates, and 3) drain primarily into large water bodies such as Lake Michigan or the Pug
et Sound. Compared to Apple Valley, the only city worth comparing to, Edina was dee
med as "lacking" per the Barr Engineering memo. So, for Staff to represent to the Coun
cil that Edina is “ahead in some areas and behind in others”, seems disingenuous at be
st. Who doesn't look good when you benchmark yourself against the little league when
you've already made the majors. Edina expects better. Ralph Zickert PS Maybe Madis
on, Wisconsin should have been chosen, based on another comment.
Waterbody Prioritization Matrix - missing data
The “Draft Priority Waterbodies” poster identifies three key areas (Conditions, Charact
eristics, Accessibility) and eight individual criteria to be used in the prioritization of indivi
dual waterbodies. Three of the eight criteria were not on the 2014 or 2018 priority matri
x and lacked any public input prior to their inclusion. Nor has any data been shared wit
h the community regarding the waterbodies and areas affected by those three criteria.
It seems unreasonable to ask for ‘final’ comments when it is unclear how the criteria m
ay affect the outcome. Edina expects better Ralph Zickert
Waterbody Prioritization Matrix - iterative process
The “Draft Priority Waterbodies” poster used a yes / no ranking for each of the eight crit
eria to be used in the prioritization of future strategies and potential City services. Such
an approach flies in the face of a “prioritization” process. No matter what the criteria ev
entually end up to be, NOT ALL criteria are equal. The priority matrix warrants an iterati
ve process to adequately assimilate community input. The current timeline inferred fro
m the BTE is a one and done approach. Edina deserves better. Ralph Zickert
Page 19 of 20
15 July 23
Nick123
VOTES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 08 August 2023
IDEAS
Clean Water Strategy Ideas
Ban or limit commercial lawn herbicide applications
The commercial application of lawn herbicides always drains off the lawns and into the
water, causing algae growth, and death and damage to all sorts of reptiles and fish and
animals. In rural areas, the same applies, except instead of lawns, it's the herbicides us
ed on farms, such as Round Up. The purpose of GMO crops is so the fields can be spr
ayed with Round Up, and the crops survive and the weeds die. Makes one wonder how
much herbicide we're ingesting, either from our food or from our water supply. Therefor
e the easiest thing to do, for the protection Edina's water, that unlike the proposals rega
rding road salt, does not jeopardize public safety, is to limit, or ban the commercial appli
cation of lawn herbicides. After all, dandelions are natural, not manicured lawns. For th
ose in doubt, consider the warning signs about keeping kids and pets off the lawn for 2
4 hours, that the workers place on the lawn after they've applied the chemicals. And for
those still in doubt, consider Agent Orange from the Vietnam War. Agent Orange was a
variation of what we now know as Round Up. For those unfamiliar, Agent Orange killed
more than just jungle plant life, it gave an untold number of American soldiers cancer,
and who knows how many Vietnamese got cancer from it as well.
Page 20 of 20
Clean Water Strategy Phase 2: Vision (Values
and Goals) and Priorities Discussion
City Council Work Session
August 15, 2023
Jessica Wilson – Water Resources Manager
Water Resources Management Plan
EdinaMN.gov 2
Local
Comprehensive
Plan
Water Resources
Chapter
Water Supply Plan
Wastewater Plans
Local Water Plan
(Water Resources
Management Plan)Core services of surface water resources
management program
Clean Water Strategy Development
•Phase I (complete): Current State of Edina’s Program
•Phase 2 (current): Vision (Values and Goals), Priorities
•Phase 3 (future): Detailed management plans for priority
waterbodies, including a pilot effort at Lake Cornelia or other lakes
as a later step, after buy-in on the policy level.
EdinaMN.gov 3
Purpose of today’s work session
•Get policy direction on the clean water vision (values and goals),
priority waterbodies, and priority pollutants
•The staff report and engagement report provide more details on how
community input has shaped the vision and priorities so far.
•Get feedback on a proposed phase 3 scope
A formal staff recommendation and City Council decision is
anticipated for this fall.
EdinaMN.gov 4
Key Questions and Discussion
•What is your reaction to the potential policy directions for the vision and
ultimately, the strategy? What more do you need to be able to decide?
•What is your reaction to the waterbodies prioritization framework? What
more do you need to be able to decide?
•What is your reaction to the priority pollutants? What more do you need
to be able to decide?
•What other questions would you like answered in phase 3? What level of
public engagement would you like to see in phase 3?
•What else are you hearing from the community about the Clean Water
Strategy?
EdinaMN.gov 5
Waterbodies in Edina
•Failing to meet standards
•Shallow
•Permanently and significantly altered by urbanization
•Stressed by climate change
EdinaMN.gov 6
Potential policy directions
Clean Water Status Quo
Shallow lakes would be managed for an outcome which prioritizes
wildlife habitat and natural aesthetic views over boating and
swimming. Native rooted, floating, and emergent aquatic vegetation
would be encouraged for their ability to support wildlife and
sequester nutrients that would otherwise be available for algae to
grow.
Shallow lakes are managed for an outcome that prioritizes open
water views and recreation access unimpeded by aquatic plants and
algae.
Tradeoffs: Boating and swimming are inhibited by vegetation.
Aquatic plants can be seen above, at, and just below the water
surface.
Tradeoffs: Chemical control of emergent, floating, and submerged
plants will supply phosphorus to opportunistic algae including
potentially harmful blue-green algae, contributing to recurring
blooms. Oxygen levels in the lake crash due to the decay of organic
matter and anerobic decay leads to swampy smells. The fishery
suffers from low dissolved oxygen, lack of food, and lack of habitat.
Only the lowest quality aquatic animals are found.
Significant effort is needed to achieve and sustain this outcome. We
understand our lakes never existed like they do now and that we get
the exact water quality we deserve. City actions either work toward a
new equilibrium or against it. We look for smart and light-touch ways
to continue to nudge the waterbodies toward or keep them in their
new equilibrium.
This policy direction is supported by staff.
Significant effort is needed to attempt to balance between the
competing values of the clear water state and open water views with
recreation access unimpeded by aquatic plants and algae.
Waterbodies in the clear water condition will fail to meet resident
expectations for boating and open water views. Waterbodies in the
turbid water condition will fail to meet regulatory clean water
benchmarks. Balancing in the middle between the clear water and
turbid water state is not a practical option. City actions and
community values are often misaligned.7
People are connected to the land and water in
reciprocity, both caring for nature and enjoying
the benefits of a healthy environment.
•People access and interpret knowledge and
guidance on urban clean water goals and
behaviors that promote them.
•People pursue activities that promote clean
water and natural resource stewardship.
•Waters are restored or maintained in conditions
allowing for beneficial uses.
All people have access to water and the
cultural values and environmental benefits they
provide.
•Clean water actions prioritize waters with public
access.
•Clean water strategies recognize the diverse
ways people value and experience the city’s
waters.
Ecosystems are in a healthy equilibrium; water is clear and
environmental benefits are sustained.
•Water clarity improves as people use water friendly practices.
•Waters are safe for human contact.
•Waters support native plants, insects, and animals consistent with an
urban setting.
•Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for wildlife consistent with
urban lands.
City actions align to do the most good towards measurable, desirable
clean water outcomes leveraging creativity and innovation.
•The city uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’ model to make progress.
•The city uses a systems approach in its implementation to consider
cumulative benefits.
•The city performs active management to improve or maintain water
clarity and chemistry at levels appropriate for urban waters.
•Pollution is managed towards achieving water resource conditions that
meet standards and support community uses.
•In-lake management practices are applied towards achieving conditions
that meet standards and support community uses.
•Clean water goals are pursued with consideration for multiple benefits
and available resources.
Values and Goals
8
The Clean Water Strategy Decision
We work toward a healthy ecosystem equilibrium in which
waters are clear, safe, and accessible.
We control vegetation to promote aquatic recreation and
open water views.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their source
and implement programs to help people do their part.
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain
infrastructure and implement programs to capture and
remove pollutants.
Restore ecological processes: We restore natural
ecosystems on land and in water.
Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their source
and implement programs to help people do their part.
Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain
infrastructure and implement programs to capture and
remove pollutants.
Control aquatic vegetation: We control vegetation above,
at, and below the surface.
EdinaMN.gov 9
Two potential clean water strategies are offered here, informed by the
policy direction decision-to-be-made, values and goals provided.
Waterbody Prioritization
•Criteria for priority waterbodies is based on resource condition (water quality,
aquatic invasive species, and public health), physical/geographic characteristics, and
public use and access.
EdinaMN.gov 10
Factors and considerations for ranking
EdinaMN.gov 11
•An initial (now former) prioritization list was shared at the June
2023 community meetings. This list can be viewed in the materials
of the project webpage which are also attached to the engagement
report.
EdinaMN.gov 12
Proposed Waterbody Prioritization
The revised tiering based on Council and community feedback received so far are as follows:
We will focus our effort on highest priority waterbodies, build on our successes, and learn
from our failures. Low and non-priority waterbodies would receive a lower tier of service.
EdinaMN.gov 13
Highest Priority Tier 2 Tier 3
Lake Cornelia
Lake Edina
Minnehaha Creek
Nine Mile Creek – North Fork
Arrowhead Lake
Highland Lake
Indianhead Lake
Lake Nancy
Melody Lake
Mirror Lake
Otto Pond
Lake Pamela
Mud Lake/Bredesen Park
Nine Mile Creek – South Fork
Point of France Pond
Southwest Ponds
Swimming Pool Pond
Non-priorityBirchcrest Pond
Hawkes Lake
Lake Harvey
Vernon Ave/View Lane Pond
West Garrison Pond
Proposed Priority Pollutants
•Nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen), sediment, and chloride.
•We will focus our primary effort on these priority pollutants and
observe non-priority pollutants and trends in partnership with local
watershed districts and state agencies.
EdinaMN.gov 14
Potential Phase 3 components and outcomes
•Public participation plan for phase 3
•A technical study (pilot at Lake Cornelia) including a breakdown of opportunity spaces where pollutants are coming from (the upstream watershed, upstream waterbodies, in-lake sources), and the costs and relative benefit of actions within those spaces. This would clarify which actions make the most sense to pursue so that we are making wise investments to meet the goals in the most efficient manner. It would also clarify the level and pace of achievement we might expect to see. We would leverage existing studies as part of this work.
•A recommendation for defined levels of service, taken through an asset management approach, driven by community values and goals.
•A recommendation for resourcing a proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
•A schedule and process for accountability in implementing the proposed new Clean Water Strategy.
•Tools for communicating the Clean Water Strategy (to be pursued as part of updating the Water Resources Management Plan).
EdinaMN.gov 15
EdinaMN.gov 16
hybrid sunsh
History of Arrowhead Lake
1960s1930s 2022
Arrowhead Lake
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27004500
2015
Arrowhead Lake Association incorporated
after decades of informal organization.
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Arrowhead Lake include:
Lake Management
Aquatic Plants
Water quality data is available from the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District for 2014, 2019, and 2020.
Summer-average highs and lows of water quality
parameters over those years are provided above.
The available data shows Arrowhead Lake generally fails
to meet the state’s goals for water quality within shallow
lakes. Elevated total phosphorus levels promote algal
growth, which reduces water clarity.
Water LevelsWater Quality
bluegill sunsh
Fish population:
Lowest recorded
water level:
871.3 ft
(February 18, 1981)
Highest recorded
water level:
878.6 ft
(July 24, 1987)
Denotes current Arrowhead Lake drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
1960
Lakeshore owners
install a well to
augment lake levels.
1978
The rst permit for
chemical treatment of
submerged aquatic
vegetation and algae in
Arrowhead Lake is
issued by the DNR.
1992
DNR issues a permit for
mechanical harvesting of
aquatic plants, an activity
that continues until 1998.
1994
Residents stock the
lake with 400 bluegill
sunsh and 600
largemouth bass.
1995
A DNR sheries survey
nds bullhead, green sunsh,
and fathead minnows in the
lake—all species tolerant of
low oxygen conditions
(hypoxic). No sh from the
previous year’s stocking
efforts were recaptured,
indicating high mortality.
1996
Pump for
lake-level-augmen
tation well fails
and is replaced.
1994
An aerator, a tool to increase
the amount of dissolved
oxygen in a lake, is installed and
operated year-round, with a
goal of managing algae blooms
and preventing winter sh kill.
1998
The DNR issues a ood-control
permit for Arrowhead Lake.
1994
The DNR issues a permit
for excavating a channel to
connect the small basin at
the southeast end of the
lake to provide access for
mechanical harvesting of
submerged aquatic plants.
Chemicals continue to be
used to control algae.
Mechanical harvesting is abandoned
and chemical control of submerged
aquatic plants and algae resumes.
1997, 2002, 2008, 2019
Arrowhead Lake pumped for
ood control.
2006
Water quality study conducted by
NMCWD indicates watershed
runoff as the largest source of
phosphorus to the lake, based on
one year of monitoring data.
~ 2013
Lake-level-management
well inoperable; no
longer used to control
lake water levels.
2020, 2021
NMCWD monitors algal levels within the lake
and observes high-levels of blue-green algae.
Blue-green algae can produce toxins that may
irritate the skin or be harmful if ingested or
inhaled. NMCWD and the City issue public alerts
to stay out of the water until conditions improve.
2017-2022
The City of Edina
conducts aquatic plant
surveys. All surveys
show invasive curly-leaf
pondweed in the lake.
2017
A report for the NMCWD
shows poor water quality.
2021-2022
A sheries survey suggests that stocking
efforts were successful and that oxygen
levels have increased. Follow-up surveys in
the spring of 2022 will assess the status of
the shery following the 2021 winter.
2006 water quality study, updated by
the NMCWD, identies potential
management activities to improve the
lake's overall health.
2021-2022
The City of Edina begins
work on a lake-level
management plan for
Arrowhead Lake
2016
Residents stock the lake with
1,000 bluegill ngerlings and
1,000 yearlings, 430 largemouth
bass ngerlings, and 90 yearlings.
2017
The City of Edina begins annual treatments for
curly-leaf pondweed. Eliminating curly-leaf pondweed
improves the native aquatic plant community and
reduces the phosphorus released into the water
when it dies and decays in mid-summer.
Arrowhead Lake is a shallow lake located in southwest Edina. The lake is land-locked, with no surface outlet.
The lake’s watershed extends north of Highway 62 and is bordered on the west side by Highway 169 and
generally bordered on the east and south side by Indian Hills Road
Arrowhead Lake has no public boat launch.
Non-motorized boats only.
fathead minnow
large mouth
bass21 acres
(surface area)
1.0 miles
(shoreline)
Amenities:
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water ClarityTotal Phosphorous
Levels
20 g/L
60 g/L
Recent water quality data
80
65
38
18
1.0
Meters
Lake depth
Mixed land use (single-family, medium-density residential, institutional).
Portions of Highways 62 and 169 are tributary to the lake.
179 acres
(watershed
drainage area)
ftMin ftMin
6 6
7 7
5
5
3 3
3
4.8 ft Avg
9 ftMax
62
169
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
Diverse aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of
Edina lakes—providing food and shelter for sh and
waterfowl and improving water quality. Aquatic plant
data from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District indicates
the Arrowhead Lake plant community has few and
poor-quality species. Invasive plant species within the lake
are shown above.
Eurasian watermilfoil is a rooted, submerged aquatic
plant, and purple loosestrife is a colorful, perennial
wetland plant. Both species outcompete native plants,
and neither provides suitable shelter, food, or nesting
habitat for native animals.
White water lilies within the lake are not invasive and
provide valuable aquatic habitat.
State goalHighestLowest
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Curly-leaf pondweed
Purple
loosestrife
Eurasian
watermilol
1964-2002, 2012-2022
Water level data is from the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Other species present:
primarily green sunsh, black bullhead
1.0 Meters
0.5 Meters
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
1960s1930s 2021
Centennial Lakes
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek
Centennial Lakes is a constructed stormwater pond
in southeast Edina, east of France Avenue between
Gallagher Drive and Minnesota Drive.
The Centennial Lakes area hosts a variety of activities. In the
summer visitors can shop at the farmer’s market, rent paddle
boats, sh from shore, and play putting courses. In the winter, the
frozen basins become a skating rink. Non-motorized boats only.
As part of the Minnesota DNR’s “Fishing in the Neighborhoods”
(FiN) program, designed to provide shore-shing opportunities in
the metropolitan area, the lake has been stocked by the DNR
every year from 2012–2017 and in 2020.
Land use 2022: Primarily commercial
and high-density residential
10 acres
(surface area)
0.9 miles
(shoreline)
214 acres
(drainage area)
History and Management of Centennial Lakes
How You Can Help
Reducing the amount of pollution
that enters Centennial Lakes helps
to protect Nine Mile Creek. Steps
that you can take to help include:
ft
MinLake depth
2
3
4
5
6
8
7
4.3 ft Mean
9 ftMax
1976
Opening of the Galleria
shopping center located
at the very northern end
of the drainage area.
Hedberg & Sons sand
and gravel pits dominate
both sides of France
Avenue to Interstate 494.
1991
Completion of
the majority of
the Centennial
Lakes project.
2006
Minnesota DNR completes
a sh survey using standard trap
nets. The most abundant species
found in the lake is green sunsh.
2011
Minnesota DNR completes a
sh survey using standard trap
and gill nets. The most abundant
species recorded are black
bullhead and hybrid sunsh.
1983
A preliminary
stormwater
management plan for
the Edina-Bloomington
area south of West 76th
Street and East of
France Avenue is
developed.
1985
Construction of Edinborough Park begins. A small
portion of the gravel pits are developed into an ofce
tower, high-rise senior housing complex, a hotel, and a
large indoor public park facility linked to condominiums.
This example of a public amenity paired with private
development provides a template for Centennial Lakes.
1988
Bloomington-based United Properties gains control of the Hedberg
site and emerges as master developer for the Centennial Lakes
project. Negotiations between United and the City of Edina produce
a master plan tailored to the terrain of the former gravel pits.
The plan calls for conversion of three pits into constructed lined
ponds, connected by a constructed channel and public park.
1989
The Centennial Lakes project begins,
including construction of three ponds
(Central, North, and South Pond) to
function as both ood storage and
public amenity. Also included is the
construction of the site storm sewer
system and reconstruction of the
France Avenue storm sewer system.
The water outlets to “Border Basin”
(west of France Avenue and slightly
north of I-494) and Nine Mile Creek.
Flood storage of the three connected
basins is approximately 26 acre-feet.
Amenities:
Fish population
black crappie
green sunsh
golden shiner
northern pike
black bullhead
hybird sunsh
pumpkinseed
France Ave S
W 76th St
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
Hawkes Lake is a small, shallow waterbody located in northwest Edina, west of Highway 100 and slightly
south of Vernon Avenue. A pumped outlet, which discharges to the southwest toward Mud Lake
(Bredesen Park), controls the water level at an elevation of 885 feet and helps prevent ooding.
Hawkes Lake
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27005600
Large mouth
bass
Northern pike
Fish population:
Water LevelsWater Quality
7 acres
(surface area)
0.5 acres
(shore length)
342 acres
(drainage area)
Water quality data collected by volunteers is available from
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the years 2016,
2017, 2018, and 2019. Highs and lows of water quality
parameters observed during those years are provided above.
The available data shows Hawkes Lake fails to meet the
state’s goals for water quality within shallow lakes. Elevated
total phosphorus levels promote algal growth, which reduces
water clarity. Lakes with very high phosphorus levels are
often characterized by turbid water, excess plant production,
algal blooms, and periodic sh kills.
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water ClarityTotal Phosphorous
Levels
20 g/L 1.1 Meters
0.9 Meters
123
83
88
34
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Hawkes Lake include:
History and Management of Hawkes Lake
Land use within the watershed
includes: Residential (low- and
high-density), institutional,
open space/parks, and a small
commercial area
Land use (2022)
RESIDENTIAL
(Anecdotal evidence)
INSTITUTIONAL
Amenities:
Hawkes Lake has no public
boat access. Non-motorized
boats only.
1950s1930s 2021
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
Vernon ave
Denotes current Hawkes Lake drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
Recent water quality data
State goalHighestLowest
Lowest recorded
water level:
880.9 ft
(January 14, 1977)
Highest recorded
water level:
892.2 ft
(July 24, 1987)
1963-2002, 2012-2022
Water level data is from the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
1989
MN DNR issues a permit for
chemical control of submerged
aquatic vegetation, lamentous algae,
and plankton algae. These permits are
issued annually through 2014.
2014 2015
Edina's Lake and Pond policy is implemented. The policy
prioritizes treatment based on a series of factors,
including water body size, level of impairment, citizen
involvement, and public use. As a result, Hawkes Lake has
not had algae or submerged vegetation control since 2014.
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
1.0
Meters
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
60 g/L
History of Lake
1960s1930s 2021
Indianhead Lake
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27004400
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Indianhead Lake include:
Aquatic Plants
Diverse aquatic vegetation is critical to the health
of Edina lakes—providing food and shelter for sh
and waterfowl and improving water quality.
Aquatic plant data from Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District indicates the Indianhead Lake
plant community has few and poor-quality species.
Invasive plant species within the lake are shown
above.
Curly-leaf pondweed can be harmful to overall lake
health. The invasive, non-native aquatic plant grows
under the ice during the winter and in early spring,
often crowding out native species. It dies in late
June and early July, much earlier than other native
species. As curly-leaf pondweed decays,
phosphorus is released into the water, fueling algal
production and causing oxygen depletion.
Yellow iris and purple loosestrife are perennial
plants. Both species out-compete native plants, and
neither provides suitable shelter, food, or nesting
habitat for native animals.
White water lilies within the lake are not invasive
and provide valuable aquatic habitat.
Water quality data is available from the Nine
Mile Creek Watershed District for 2014, 2019,
and 2020. Summer-average highs and lows of
water quality parameters from those years
are provided above.
The available data shows Indianhead Lake
generally fails to meet the state’s goals for
water quality within shallow lakes. Elevated
total phosphorus levels promote algal growth,
which reduces water clarity.
Water LevelsWater Quality
bluegill sunsh
Fish population:
Lowest recorded
water level
861.0 ft
(February 28, 2013)
Highest recorded
water level
865.7 ft
(April 23, 2019)
Denotes current Indianhead drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
Indianhead Lake has no public boat launch.
Non-motorized boats only.
Large
mouth bass
14 acres
(surface area)
0.9 miles
(shoreline)
Amenities:
Curly-leaf pondweed
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water ClarityTotal Phosphorous
Levels
20 g/L
60 g/L
Recent water quality data
146
61
34
19
State goalHighestLowest
0.5 Meters
0.9 Meters
114 acres
(drainage area)
black crappie
Indianhead is a shallow, landlocked lake located in southeast Edina. The Indianhead Lake
subwatershed is southeast of Arrowhead Lake. The residential subwatershed covers
114 acres which ultimately drain to Indianhead Lake via storm sewer and overland ow.
hybrid sunsh
7 ftMax
Lake depth
4.7 ft Avg.
6
5 5
6
55
Yellow iris Purple loosestrife
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
Valley View Rd
2021-2022
The City of Edina begins work on
a lake-level management plan for
this landlocked waterbody.
Lake Management
1960
Lake augmentation
well is drilled, and a
DNR appropriation
permit is issued.
1973
A DNR permit is issued
for control of submerged
vegetation. Start of
annual chemical control
of submerged aquatic
vegetation through 2019.
1979
Study commissioned by the
"Indianhead Improvement"
group concludes that the
most appropriate lake
management approach is
controlling phosphorus input
from lawn care fertilizers.
1979-1980
Clean-Flo lake
cleanser system
installed to control
submerged aquatic
vegetation. The system
includes an aerator,
a tool to increase the
amount of dissolved
oxygen in the lake and
prevent winter sh kill.
2006
Water quality study
completed by NMCWD.
The report identies loading
from the lake's watershed as
the largest source of
phosphorus to the lake.
1993
The Minnesota Legislature passes a
law that prohibits the use of
groundwater (in excess of 10 million
gallons per year) to maintain lake
levels. This legislation is in response to
low lake levels throughout the state
following the 1988-1989 drought.
2013
Residents stock the
lake with 50 black
crappie, 200 bluegill
sunsh, and 200
largemouth bass.
2016
Residents stock the lake
with black crappie (2,000),
bluegill sunsh (5,000), and
largemouth bass (1,900).
2019
The Indianhead Lake
Association stops
non-specic submerged
aquatic vegetation control
and the City of Edina
begins annual spring
herbicide treatments for
invasive curly-leaf
pondweed. Both of these
actions improve native
plant communities and
reduce phosphorus levels.
2020
The lake is dominated by
blue-green algae, which
can be harmful if ingested
by people and animals.
2006 water quality study updated
by the NMCWD identies
potential management activities to
improve the lake’s overall health.
2021
The City of Edina performs a sheries
assessment. The results suggest that
2013 and 2016 stocking efforts were
successful and that recruitment (survival
of sh spawned in the lake) may be
occurring. Follow-up surveys in the
spring of 2022 will assess the status of
the shery following the 2021 winter.
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
1993-2021, 2012-2022
Water level data is from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
1.0
Meters
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
1997, 2002, 2008,
2017, 2019
Indianhead Lake pumped
for ood control.
2016
Informally organized since the 1970s, the Indianhead
Lake Association becomes incorporated May 20, 2016.
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
common carp
(invasive)
A feasibility study is completed and recommends
a variety of management activities, including alum
treatment, aeration, sh management, and
stormwater ltration.
History of Lake Cornelia
Lake Cornelia is a shallow lake with northern and
southern basins connected by storm pipes.
1960s1930s 2021
North Lake Cornelia
100
62
Stormwater runoff
received from
112-acre area.
100
62
Southdale Shopping Center Southdale Shopping Center
1898
Lake Cornelia appears on
Edina’s plat map as part of
a natural wetland.
1978
The MN DNR issues a permit for
the control of submerged aquatic
plants. These efforts continue
until 2015, when Edina's Lake and
Pond policy is implemented.
1929-1941
With the arrival of
farmers, area wetlands
are drained. Lake
Cornelia appears dry
at times due to
drought conditions.
2016, 2020, 2021
NMCWD monitors algal levels within the lake and
observes high levels of blue-green algae. Blue-green algae
can produce toxins that may irritate the skin or be harmful
if ingested or inhaled. NMCWD and the City issue public
alerts to stay out of the water until conditions improve.
2018
Based on observed phosphorus concentrations,
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency lists South
Cornelia as impaired due to excessive nutrients.
2020
Agencies study the
lake to determine the
sources of pollution
and assign
responsibility for
water quality
improvements. This is
a called a Total
Maximum Daily Load
study, required by the
Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency
Lake Cornelia
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water
Clarity
Total Phosphorous
Levels
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27002800
2010
Water quality
study completed
by NMCWD
2019
Lake study updated
2015-2016
Lake Cornelia Lake
Group formed
Lake Management
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
Aquatic Plants
Diverse aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of
Edina lakes—providing food and shelter for sh and
waterfowl and improving water quality. Invasive plant
species within the lake are shown above.
Curly-leaf pondweed further contributes to the lake’s
problems. The invasive, non-native aquatic plant grows
under the ice during the winter and in early spring, often
crowding out native species. It dies in late June and early
July, much earlier than other native species. As curly-leaf
pondweed decays, phosphorus is released into the water,
fueling algal production.
Eurasian watermilfoil is a rooted, submerged aquatic
plant, and purple loosestrife is a colorful, perennial
wetland plant. Both species outcompete native plants,
and neither provides suitable shelter, food, or nesting
habitat for native animals.
Water LevelsWater Quality
Water quality data for six of the years between 2013
and 2020 is available from the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District and the Metropolitan Council's
Citizen-Assisted Monitoring Program. Summer-average
highs and lows of water quality parameters over those
years are provided above.
Lake Cornelia has poor water quality. Both basins are
on Minnesota’s impaired waters list for excess
nutrients. The poor water quality is primarily due to
excess phosphorus in the lake. The phosphorus comes
from many sources, including stormwater runoff,
decaying plants, and nutrient-rich sediments.
Bottom-feeding sh also stir up this sediment,
releasing phosphorus and creating murky water.
2021
Construction of the
Rosland Park stormwater
ltration system.
The project removes
phosphorus from
watershed runoff.
2020
South Cornelia Buffer Restoration: Project to restore the
shoreline and plant a buffer of native plants completed.
May 2020
Alum Treatment:
An in-lake alum
treatment is
performed to control
phosphorus release
from lake-bottom
sediments.
2017
Curly-leaf pondweed treatments:
Beginning of annual spring herbicide
treatments to control curly-leaf
pondweed. Reducing curly-leaf
pondweed can improve the native
aquatic plant communities and reduce
phosphorus levels.
2021
Fish Management:
Continued goldsh
and carp studies
evaluate management
methods to minimize
lake sediment
disturbance.
2008
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency adds
North Lake Cornelia to a national inventory of
waterbodies that are not meeting water quality
goals because of high phosphorus levels.
Recent water quality data
North
Cornelia
South
Cornelia
1842 Mckinley Street NE
Denotes current Lake Cornelia drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
1950s
Suburban growth gives
rise to Southdale
shopping center, the
expansion of highways,
and more impervious
areas. Storm sewer
drainage systems alter
the watershed, bringing
more runoff and
pollutants to the
shallow lake.
1960s
The Edina City Manager receives a
recommendation from City staff to
control "weeds" in Lake Cornelia.
black crappie
green sunsh
Stormwater runoff
received from
863-acre area
19 acres
(surface area)
31 acres
(surface area)Amenities:A pavilion, a picnic shelter, tables, grills, a 1.1-mile paved path, and a shing
pier. Rosland Park, adjacent to Lake Cornelia, has baseball elds,
a disc golf course, a playground, pickleball courts, and tennis courts.
There are no public swimming beaches at Lake Cornelia.
Non-motorized boats only.
bluegill sunsh
goldsh
(invasive)yellow perch
Native and invasive
sh population:
Other species present: golden
shiner, pumpkinseed
Lowest
recorded
water level
858.4 ft
(Nov. 30, 2012)
Highest
recorded
water level
862.3 ft
(Apr. 30, 2014)
Lowest
recorded
water level
858.1 ft
(Nov. 30, 2012)
Highest
recorded
water level
859.6 ft
(Jun. 29, 2020)
North basin
3 ft Mean
7 ftMax
5 5
44 4
ftMin
197
174
72
84 97
20 g/L
State goalsNorthSouth
(South’s highest
recorded clarity)
(North’s highest
recorded clarity)
(North &
South’s lowest
recorded clarity)
97
36
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Lake Cornelia include:
South basin
4 ft Mean
8 ftMax
ftMin
7 7
66 6
55
hybird sunsh
black bullhead
As part of Minnesota DNR’s Fishing in the
Neighborhoods (FiN) program, the lake is stocked
with 120 adult bluegill sunsh to provide
shore-shing opportunities in metropolitan areas.
60 g/L
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Curly-leaf pondweed
Purple
loosestrife
Eurasian
watermilol31
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
2012-2022
North Cornelia water level data is from
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
1964-2002, 2012-2022
South Cornelia water level data is from
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
Efforts to control submerged aquatic plants
2015
General submerged aquatic plant treatments
stop with the implementation of Edina’s Lakes
and Ponds policy, which prioritizes treatment
based on a series of factors, including water
body size, level of impairment, citizen
involvement, and public use.
1.0
Meters
0.2 Meters
0.6 Meters
0.8 Meters
South Lake Cornelia
1960s1930s 2021
Lake Edina
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27002900
Lake Management
Diverse aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of
Edina Lakes—providing food and shelter for sh and
waterfowl and improving water quality. Invasive plant
species within the lake are shown above.
Curly-leaf pondweed can be harmful to overall lake
health. The invasive, non-native aquatic plant grows
under the ice during the winter and grows in early
spring, often crowding out native species. It dies in late
June and early July, much earlier than other native
species. As curly-leaf pondweed decays, phosphorus is
released into the water, fueling algal production and
causing oxygen depletion which can lead to sh kills.
Eurasian watermilfoil is a rooted, submerged aquatic
plant, and purple loosestrife is a colorful, perennial
wetland plant. Both species outcompete native plants,
and neither provides suitable shelter, food, or nesting
habitat for native animals.
Denotes current Lake Edina drainage area; historical
drainage areas may have varied
2015
General submerged aquatic plant treatments
stop with the implementation of Edina’s Lakes
and Ponds policy, which prioritizes treatment
based on a series of factors, including water
body size, level of impairment, citizen
involvement, and public use.
1978
The MN DNR
issues a permit to
control submerged
plants in Lake Edina.
2015
Water balance study is completed
by NMCWD; results indicate low
water levels are primarily the result
of lower- than-average snowpack
during the winter of 2014–2015.
2016
Based on water quality
indicators, the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency
lists Lake Edina as impaired
due to excessive nutrients.
2017
The Minnesota
DNR lists Lake
Edina as infested
with Eurasian
watermilfoil.
2019
Water quality study developed by the NMCWD.
The report shows water quality in Lake Edina is
highly inuenced by the water quality of the
upstream Lake Cornelia. Accordingly, the primary
recommended management strategy is to address
water quality conditions in Lake Cornelia.
2020
The City of Edina begins
efforts to control curly-leaf
pondweed. Eliminating this
invasive species improves the
native aquatic plant community.
2020
Water quality
report for
NMCWD shows
poor water quality.
2020
NMCWD completes an alum
treatment on Lake Cornelia,
expected to lower phosphorus
levels in both Cornelia and
downstream Lake Edina.
2020
The Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency completes a Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL) study. A TMDL
identies pollution sources and and
estimates pollution reductions needed
to meet water quality standards.
2008
First observations of
curly-leaf pondweed
(CLP) in Lake Edina.
The plant is found
periodically over the
next 13 years.
2020-2021
High phosphorus concentrations
encourage excessive growth of
blue-green algae. Blue-green
algae can be harmful if it is
ingested, inhaled, or comes in
contact with the skin.
Aquatic Plants Water LevelsWater Quality
Water quality data is available from the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District for the years 2012, 2015, 2017, and
2020. Summer-average highs and lows of water quality
parameters over those years are provided above.
The available data shows Lake Edina generally fails to
meet the state's goals for shallow lakes. Elevated total
phosphorus levels promote algal growth, which reduces
water clarity.
Recent water quality data
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water
Clarity
Total Phosphorous
Levels
20 g/L
60 g/L
146
59
State goalsHighestLowest
77
16
4 ftMax
ft
Min
Lake Edina is a shallow lake located in southeast Edina,
just east of Highway 100 and north of Industrial Boulevard.
There is no public access to Lake Edina. The Nine
Mile Creek Regional trail passes along the west side
of the lake for 0.3 miles. Non-motorized boats only.
Amenities:Lake depth
Land use 2022: Land use within the watershed is mainly low-density residential, with smaller portions of high-density
residential, commercial, institutional (Cornelia Elementary School), park, wetland, and open-water areas.
24 acres
surface area
1.0 mile
shoreline
2.9 ft Mean2
3
395 acres
drainage area
History of
Lake Edina
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Lake Edina include:
Curly-leaf pondweed
Purple
loosestrife
Eurasian
watermilol
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
100
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
1964-2002, 2012-2022
Water level data is from the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
Lowest recorded
water level:
818.0 ft
(February 9, 1982)
Highest recorded
water level:
825.4 ft
(July 24, 1987)
1.0
Meters
0.2 Meters
0.8 Meters
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
History and Management
Lake Harvey
Watershed District: Minnehaha Creek Public water ID: 27067000
Lake Harvey is a wetland located just east of Highway
100 and south of the Edina Country Club golf course.7 acres
(surface area)
0.5 miles
(shoreline)
42 acres
(drainage area)
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Lake Harvey include:
1930s
1960s
2021
RESIDENTIAL
Land use in the area surrounding the wetland is
predominantly low-density residential with
some scattered areas of institutional land use.
Land use (2022)
Lake Harvey has limited recreational
opportunities. Non-motorized boats only.
Amenities:
The wetland is not stocked with sh, but
there is anecdotal evidence of catsh.
Fish population:
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water ClarityTotal Phosphorous
Levels
Water quality data for 2010 was collected by
the Met Council's Citizen-Assisted Monitoring
Program (CAMP) and made available by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
The available data shows that Lake Harvey
fails to meet the state’s goals for water quality
within shallow lakes. Elevated total
phosphorus levels promote algal growth,
which reduces water clarity. Lakes with very
high phosphorus levels are often characterized
by turbid water, excess plant production, algal
blooms, and periodic sh kills. Lake Harvey has
been treated annually for algae since 1983.
Water Quality
152
72
Denotes current Lake Harvey
drainage area; historical drainage
areas may have varied
Learn more about these strategies at minnehahacreek.org/education
Recent water quality data
State goal
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
1.0 Meters
0.3 Meters
20 g/L
60 g/L
RESIDENTIALGOLFPARKWETLAND SCHOOL
Highlands Lake is a shallow, land-locked lake with a pumped outlet. The 276-acre watershed is east of Mirror
Lake and north of Vernon Avenue. It is bordered on the north by Interlachen Boulevard. A pump is used to
control the elevation of Highlands Lake at 888 feet.
1960s1930s 2021
Highlands Lake
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27066800
1994
A lift station is installed in
neighboring Highland Park, to help
control water levels in the lake.
Water from the lake outlet ows
south, connecting with the storm
sewer system along Vernon Avenue,
which discharges to Hawkes Lake.
2014
Bluegill, fathead
minnow, largemouth
bass, yellow perch
stocked by residents.
2020
A water level study is conducted
by the City of Edina. Based on
historical data, groundwater
levels and precipitation in the
Highlands area have increased
over the past decade.
Highlands Lake is not currently monitored for
total phosphorus and chlorophyll-a. 2019 data
from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources shows that Highlands Lake meets
goals for water clarity.
Land use in the Highlands Lake
watershed is characterized by
residential areas, part of the Interlachen
golf course, a wetland area, Highlands
Park, and a portion of the drainage
from Highlands Elementary School.
11 acres
(surface area)
3.7 feet
(average depth)
0.9 miles
(shoreline)
bluegill sunsh
fathead minnow
largemouth bass
Amenities:Highlands Lake is surrounded by the 40-acre Highlands Park. The park has benches, picnic
tables, tennis courts, a playground, and baseball, soccer, and football elds. Motorboats are
not allowed on Highlands Lake, except for emergency rescue or maintenance.
Water Clarity
yellow perch
Water Quality
Fish stocked in the last 10 years:Land Use
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Highlands Lake include:
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
273 acres
(drainage area)
Data from Minnnesota Department
of Natural Resources
Interlachen Blvd
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
2.5 Meters
1.0 m
History of Highlands Lake
4 ft Mean 4 ft Mean
8 ftMax
1 ft
5 5
3 3
Lake depth
Denotes current Highlands Lake drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
2022
The City of Edina
conducts an aquatic
plant survey. Curly-leaf
pondweed is found
and treated.
common carp
(invasive)
Lake Nancy and Otto Pond
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27067700
Fish population:
Lakes History and Management
Denotes current Lake Nancy and Otto Pond drainage
areas; historical drainage areas were larger.
2015
Shoreline residents
meet to discuss
incorporating as a
lake association.
Construction of
Highway 62 and
local roadways.
2016
Lake Nancy Lake Association is
incorporated with at least 50% of
shoreline owner involvement.
The purpose of the association is to:
(1) maintain, protect, and improve the
water quality, aesthetic values, wildlife
habitat, and recreational capacity of
Lake Nancy,
(2) educate shoreline owners and the
public about the condition and
protection of Lake Nancy, and
(3) provide a representation
framework for shoreline owners’
interests regarding Lake Nancy.
Historically, Lake Nancy, Otto
Pond, and present-day Swimming
Pool Pond were all connected.
The construction of Highway 62
and local roadways in the late
1950s and early 1960s resulted in
the waterbodies being separated.
2018
NMCWD commissions a sheries
survey which identied an abundant
goldsh population in Lake Nancy and
Lake Cornelia, connected via a storm
sewer under Highway 62. Similar to
carp, goldsh have the potential to
negatively impact water quality by
stirring up wetland sediments and
increasing nutrient levels due to
nutrient cycling through the sh gut.
2019
Aquatic plant survey
conducted on Lake
Nancy. No curly-leaf
pondweed found.
2020
Aquatic plant survey conducted in
the spring on Lake Nancy. No
curly-leaf pondweed found during
the survey, but a resident reports
seeing the plant later in the year.
2021
Curly-leaf pondweed is
found in two locations
during a formal survey
of Lake Nancy. These
invasive aquatic plants
were hand-pulled.
2021
A report on the invasive goldsh
population and inter-waterbody
movement in the Lake Cornelia
system is prepared for the
NMCWD. A population of about
8,000 goldsh is estimated in
Lake Nancy.
The report's recommendation is
to test multiple removal
approaches on Lake Cornelia
(baited box netting, baiting and
seining, stream trapping) before
considering other management
activities for Lake Nancy.
2022
A report evaluating internal loading
in Lake Nancy and Otto Pond is
prepared for the NMCWD.
The review of water quality data and
information from sediment cores
suggest that Lake Nancy has
signicant “internal loading” (the
release of phosphorus into the lake
from bed sediment). Some of this
loading is assumed to come from
goldsh and carp stirring up
sediment. By contrast, the water
quality of Otto Pond is relatively
good and there is no evidence of
internal loading.
Lake Nancy and Otto Pond are located just north of Highway 62 and west of Highway 100.
The wetlands are not connected, but both ultimately drain to Lake Cornelia. At times, Otto Pond
also drains north to the Minnehaha Creek watershed.
There is a public trail between Lake
Nancy and Otto Pond, but no public
boat access on either waterbody.
Non-motorized boats only.
Amenities:
10 acres
(surface area)
4 acres
(surface area)
30 acres
(drainage area)
119 acres
(drainage area)
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Lake Nancy and
Otto Pond include:
2017
Aquatic plant survey
conducted on Lake
Nancy and no curly-leaf
pondweed found.
1978
A DNR permit for submerged aquatic plant
control is granted for Otto Pond. These
treatments occur annually until 2015.
1980
A DNR permit to treat planktonic
algae and submerged vegetation is
granted for Lake Nancy. Annual
algae treatments are ongoing;
treatment for submerged aquatic
vegetation occur until 2015.
2015
Annual treatment
of algae begins in
Otto Pond.
Annual treatment of Lake
Nancy for submerged
aquatic vegetation resumes.
Water Quality
Water quality data was obtained during a 2021
study of internal loading in Lake Nancy and Otto
Pond. Summer averages of water quality parameters
are provided above for both Lake Nancy and
Otto Pond.
This data shows Lake Nancy fails to meet the state's
goals for water quality within shallow lakes. Elevated
total phosphorus levels promote algal growth, which
reduces water clarity.
Phosphorus and chlorophyll-a levels in Otto Pond
are just slightly above state goals, reecting better
water quality than in Lake Nancy.
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Total Phosphorous
Levels
20 g/L60 g/L
Water
Clarity
goldsh
(invasive)
1960s1940s 2021
Water Levels Woodale AveLearn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
OTTO POND
Recent water quality data
Data are only available for Lake Nancy
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
NANCY
4 ftMax
5 ftMax
1 ft1 ft
Wetland depth Wetland depth
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
Late 1950s-
Early 1960s
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
1964-2022
Water level data is available from the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
Lowest recorded
water level:
861.0 ft
(July 28, 1988)
Highest recorded
water level:
863.3 ft
(April 10, 1965)
1.0
Meters
0.2 Meters
(Nancy)
0.6 Meters
(Otto)
256
95
67 24
State goalsNancyOtto
Lake Pamela
Watershed District: Minnehaha CreekPublic water ID: 27067500
2000-2002
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completes projects to
address poor water quality in Pamela Lake and Minnehaha Creek.
Actions include:
Dredging the lake to
increase the average depth
and create about 1.2 acres
of deep-water habitat
Dredging the two major storm
sewer outlets and constructing
sediment-settling basins at
those outlets to capture and
settle pollutants from storm
sewer runoff before it drains
into the wetland
Building three settling ponds
in the northern part of the
park to receive and clean
stormwater runoff from
stormwater drains
Water quality data was collected by the
Met Council's Citizen-Assisted
Monitoring Program and made available
by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency. Data is available for six of the
years between 2005 and 2015.
Summer-average highs and lows of
water quality parameters over those
years are provided at left.
The available data shows that Lake
Pamela generally fails to meet the state’s
goals for water quality within shallow
lakes. Elevated total phosphorus levels
promote algal growth, which reduces
water clarity.
Lake Pamela is a 7-acre DNR-protected wetland located in
the south end of Pamela Park, just west of France Avenue
between 58th and 62nd streets.
Lake Pamela sits in the 62-acre Pamela Park.
The park features playground equipment with
benches and grassy areas for picnics. There are
also soccer elds, softball elds, tennis courts,
a batting cage, and an ice rink in the winter.
Non-motorized boats only.
Amenities:
7 acres
(surface area)
0.6 miles
(shoreline)
276 acres
(drainage area)
History and Management of Lake Pamela
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Lake Pamela include:
1 2 3 RESIDENTIALWETLAND
2022
The land use in this
watershed is primarily
low-density residential.
PARK
1961
A ood-control ditch is
constructed from Pamela
Park north toward 58th
Street, eventually connecting
to Minnehaha Creek.
1996
The rst of annual
permits for algae control
issued by the MN DNR.
Water Quality
8 feet
(Max depth)
3.4 feet
(Average depth)
1950s1930s 2021
Denotes current Lake Pamela drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
Recent water quality data
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Total Phosphorous
Levels
213
194
10
5160 g/L
20 g/L
State goalsHighestLowest
Water
Clarity
France Ave S
Learn more about these strategies at minnehahacreek.org/education
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
1.0 Meters
1.1 Meters
0.5 Meters
1960s1930s 2021
Melody Lake
Watershed District: Minnehaha CreekPublic water ID: 27002900
Fish population:
Lake Management
Denotes current Melody Lake
drainage area; historical
drainage areas may have varied
1970
Minnesota State 100 is expanded,
and a lift station is installed at
Melody Lake to manage water
levels. Water is pumped to the
Highway 100 drainage system,
which ows north and ultimately
discharges to Minnehaha Creek.
1988
DNR permit allows treatment of
the lake with aquatic herbicides
and algaecides. Treatment for
lamentous algae occurs annually.
2009
The Metropolitan Council gives the lake
a letter grade of "D" for water quality,
describing it as severely impaired.
Historical data shows the lake to be highly
eutrophic—having excessive nutrients
(primarily phosphorus), which can lead to
algal blooms, lack of oxygen, and turbidity.
2013
Melody Lake is treated for
submerged aquatic
vegetation (invasive
Eurasian watermilfoil ) and
algae (both lamentous
and planktonic).
2015
Aeration system, purchased and installed
decades earlier by the Friends of Melody Lake
group, is shut off and abandoned in place when
the group elects not to pay for the service.
2015
General submerged plant
treatments stop with the
implementation of Edina's Lakes
and Ponds policy, which prioritizes
treatment based on a series of
factors, including water body size,
level of impairment, citizen
involvement, and public use.
2016
A lake-level management plan is
developed by the City of Edina to
dene the circumstances under
which Melody Lake will be
pumped. According to the plan, a
water level greater than 887 feet
will trigger pumping until the
elevation is lowered to 886 feet.
2018-2022
The City of Edina conducts aquatic plant
surveys. Nymphaea odorata, known as North
American white water lily or pond lily, is
found in each survey. This is a plant with
large, fragrant, white owers and at, round
leaves (up to 10 inches across) oating on the
water's surface or just beneath. Flowers open
early in the morning and close about noon.
2019
Curly-leaf pondweed
found and treated in
seven locations; no
curly-leaf pondweed
was found in the lake in
no curly-left pondweed
was found in the lake in
2018, 2020, or 2021.
2021
The City of Edina completes shoreline
restoration at Melody Lake Park, adding a
native plant buffer to stabilize the shoreline,
provide wildlife habitat, and manage invasive
plants. The restoration opens views and makes
it easier to access Melody Lake. A rock landing
was added at the shoreline for year-round use.
2022
The City of Edina
conducts an
aquatic plant
survey. Curly-leaf
pondweed is found
and treated.
1995
Friends of
Melody Lake, an
informal lake
group, organizes.
1986
Melody Lake treated
for excessive algae.
2016
Friends of Melody Lake
ofcially incorporated
Melody Lake, a landlocked basin, is located just west of
Highway 100 and north of Benton Drive. Water levels within
the lake are controlled by a pump installed to maintain
a consistent water elevation (approximately 887 feet). This
helps reduce the ood risk to nearby homes.
A 4-acre park with benches surrounds Lake Melody, offering
visitors a quiet place to walk and spot wildlife. Motorboats are
not allowed, except for emergency rescue or maintenance.
Amenities:
Land use 2022: Low-density residential and institutional
8 acres
(surface area)
0.9 miles
(shoreline)
176 acres
(drainage area)
History of Lake
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Melody Lake include:
Curly-leaf pondweed
Diverse aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of
Edina Lakes—providing food and shelter for sh and
waterfowl and improving water quality. Invasive plant
species within the lake are shown above.
Curly-leaf pondweed an be harmful to overall lake
health. The invasive plant grows under the ice during
the winter and is generally the rst pondweed to
come up in the spring. It dies in late June and early
July, much earlier than other native species. As
curly-leaf pondweed decays, phosphorus is released
into the water, fueling algal production and depleting
oxygen.
Eurasian watermilfoil is a rooted, submerged aquatic
plant. Like curly-leaf pondweed, it outcompetes
native plants and does not provide suitable shelter,
food, or nesting habitat for native animals.
Aquatic PlantsWater Quality
Eurasian
watermilfoil
Water quality data for 2009 and 2010 was
collected by the Met Council's Citizen-Assisted
Monitoring Program (CAMP) and made available
by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Summer-average highs and lows of water quality
parameters over those years are provided above.
The available data shows that Melody Lake fails to
meet the state's goals for water quality within
shallow lakes. Elevated total phosphorus levels
promote algal growth, which reduces water clarity.
Recent water quality data
State goalsHighestLowest
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Total Phosphorous
Levels
20 g/L
60 g/L
164 82
140
61
Water Clarity
0.5 Meters
bluegill sunsh
white crappie
northern pike
Walleye
4.2 ft
Avg.
7 ftMaxLake depthSource: Fishbrain.com
100
Learn more about these strategies at minnehahacreek.org/education
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
1.0
Meters
History of Lake
1960s1930s 2021
~1995
A pumped outlet is installed on the
southwest side of the landlocked
lake to alleviate high lake levels.
Water pumped from Mirror Lake
ows southwest to the storm sewer
system along Blake Road.
Mirror Lake
Algae Level
(Chlorophyll-a)
Water ClarityTotal Phosphorous
Levels
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Public water ID: 27005500
20 g/L
60 g/L
Lake Management
Diverse aquatic vegetation is critical to the health
of Edina Lakes—providing food and shelter for sh
and waterfowl and improving water quality. Invasive
plant species within the lake are shown above.
Curly-leaf pondweed can be harmful to overall lake
health. The invasive plant grows under the ice
during the winter and is generally the rst
pondweed to come up in the spring. It dies in late
June and early July, much earlier than other native
species. As curly-leaf pondweed decays,
phosphorus is released into the water, fueling algal
production and depleting oxygen.
Purple loosestrife is a colorful, perennial wetland
plant. Like curly-leaf pondweed, it outcompetes
native plants and does not provide suitable shelter,
food, or nesting habitat for native animals.
Denotes current Mirror Lake drainage area;
historical drainage areas may have varied
2004
A lake study for NMCWD concluded that the
cause of Mirror Lake's water quality problem was
excess phosphorus from stormwater runoff and
internal sources. Internal sources include mid
season die-back of curly-leaf pondweed and
phosphorus from lake bottom sediments.
Mirror Lake is a landlocked basin in the northwest portion of Edina. Water levels
within the lake are controlled by a pump installed to manage the water elevation
(approximately 908.5 feet).
2015
General submerged plant
treatments stop with the
implementation of Edina’s Lakes
and Ponds policy, which prioritizes
treatment based on a series of
factors, including waterbody size,
level of impairment, resident
involvement, and public use.
1982
Water quality study is
completed. The study
recommends the development
of a water quality management
program to address dense
aquatic weed and algae growth.
2019
Water quality report for
NMCWD shows poor water
quality. Aquatic plant data shows
that the number of plant species
and quality of the plant
community is poor.
2019
Curly-leaf pondweed
found and treated in
seven spots.
2022
The City of Edina conducts an
aquatic plant survey. Curly-leaf
pondweed is found and treated.
The 2004 water quality study will
be updated by NMCWD, including
recommendations for management
activities to improve lake health.
2022
NMCWD will
conduct a sh survey
of Mirror Lake.
Aquatic Plants Water LevelsWater Quality
23 acres
(surface area)
1.4 miles
(shoreline)
282 acres
(drainage area)
yellow perch
Recent water quality data
Mirror Lake has no public boat access.
Motorboats are not allowed, except for
emergency rescue or maintenance.
Land use 2022: The Mirror Lake watershed is primarily single-family residential land
use, but also includes a portion of the Interlachen Country Club golf course.
Amenities:goldsh
(invasive)
104
89
46 30
State goalsHighestLowest
0.4 Meters
0.6 Meters
The lake is not stocked with sh,
but there is anecdotal evidence
of goldsh and perch
Fish
population:
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Mirror Lake include:
15 ftMax
5.4 ft Avg.
121312
7
101111
8
ftMin ftMin
Lake depth
12
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
1963-2002, 2012-2022
Water level data is from the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
NMCWD = Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Interlachen Blvd
Water quality data is available from Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District for the years 2012 and 2019.
Summer-averages highs and lows of water quality
parameters over those years are provided above.
The available data shows Mirror Lake fails to meet
the state's goals for water quality within shallow
lakes. Elevated total phosphorus levels promote algal
growth, which reduces water clarity.
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
Interactive ood map
Water resources library
Find more information
from the City of Edina:
Lowest recorded
water level:
905.7 ft
(April 30, 2015)
Highest recorded
water level:
909.4 ft
(June 27, 2014)
1.0
Meters
Curly-leaf
pondweed
Purple
loosestrife
Southwest Edina Ponds
Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek
History and Management of Southwest Edina Ponds
The Southwest Edina Ponds are a series of natural and constructed ponds and wetlands that
ultimately drain to the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek. The watershed (shown below) is bordered by
West 70th Street to the north, West 78th Street to the south, Gleason Road on the west, and the
Soo Line Railroad on the east.
1976
Stormwater project expands existing
ponds and creates new, shallow ponds
(2-4 feet deep) in low-lying areas. The
ponds are designed to create stormwater
storage and waterfowl nesting habitat,
including “goose islands” at the center of
the ponds and a vegetated perimeter.
411 acres
(drainage area)
How You Can Help
Steps that you can take to
help Southwest Edina
Ponds include:
1970s1930s 2021
Denotes current Southwest Edina
ponds drainage area; historical
drainage areas may have varied
2008
The City of Edina receives a
permit to chemically control
lamentous and planktonic
algae in Cote Pond. Two
treatments are authorized
from June 10 to September 1.
2009
Residents petition the City to restore
one of the Southwest Edina Ponds
(Cote Pond) to its original as-built
condition. This would require the
pond, located just west of Delaney
Boulevard and south of Long Brake
Trail, to be drained and sediment to be
removed from the bottom.
After comparing eld measurements
to the original design, City staff
conclude that the pond does not show
signicant sedimentation and full-scale
dredging is not pursued. However,
removal of sediment buildup around
storm sewer inlets is recommended.
Homeowners are encouraged to plant
native buffer strips next to the pond
and implement good lawn-maintenance
techniques to prevent organic waste
and chemicals from entering the pond.
1980s
Treatment for Cote and
Long Brake ponds starts.
1990s
Treatment for
Shannon Pond starts.
RESIDENTIAL
2022
The Southwest Edina
Ponds watershed is
mainly characterized
by low- and
medium-density
residential land use.
There are some
commercial and
industrial areas in
the eastern portion
of the watershed.
Learn more about these strategies at ninemilecreek.org
COMMERCIALCahill RdW 78th St
Installing rain gardens
and planting
shoreline buffers
Cleaning up grass
clippings and leaves
Participating in the
adopt-a-drain program
(mn.adoptadrain.org)
Redirecting gutter
downspouts towards
vegetated areas
Minimizing use of
fertilizer on lawns
Shannon Pond
Cote Pond
Long Brake Trail Pond
EdinaMN.gov
Clean Water Strategy
Vision (Values and Goals) Preview
March 19, 2024
Meeting purpose
•Preview proposed Clean Water Strategy Vision (values and goals)
•A decision on the Clean Water Strategy Vision is tentatively planned for April 2024
•Address comments and questions from August 15th work session
•Why establish a Clean Water Strategy
•Clear versus turbid water condition explained, with photos
•Edina’s proposed Clean Water Strategy and the broader context of water resources
management
•‘Status Quo’ service level versus ‘Clean Water Vision’ service level
•Prioritization and potential phase 3
Clean Water Vision (values and goals)
•It is important that we establish strategic objectives (set vision and goals)
so that we can focus on meeting them in a systematic, risk-based,
prioritized, and cost-effective manner.
•The City has the opportunity to set local priorities, service levels, and
impact the pace of achievement for clean water.
•Staff recommends a clean water vision in which shallow lakes would be
managed for an outcome which prioritizes wildlife habitat and natural
aesthetic views.
•The vision sets the framework and is the foundation for the strategy.
Proposed Clean Water Vision
Edina’s waterbodies are in a healthy ecosystem equilibrium, where
waters are clear, safe, and accessible.
•Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their source and help people
do their part.
•Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain infrastructure and
take actions to capture and remove pollutants.
•Protect and restore ecological processes: We protect and restore
natural ecosystems on land and in water.
Framing Clean Water Strategy Values and Goals
•Values and goals were framed by community values as described in the
established budget pillars, city values, quality of life surveys, and regulatory
and stakeholder requirements.
•These were further refined based on public feedback received.
•The proposed Clean Water Strategy vision was developed from these
values and goals.
Clean Water Strategy Values and Goals
Ecosystems are in a healthy equilibrium; water is
clear and environmental benefits are sustained.
•Water clarity improves as people use water friendly
practices.
•Water is safe for human contact.
•Waters support native plants, insects, and animals
consistent with an urban setting.
•Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for wildlife
consistent with urban lands.
People are connected to the land and water in
reciprocity, both caring for nature and enjoying the
benefits of a healthy environment.
•People access and interpret knowledge and guidance on
urban clean water goals and behaviors that promote
them.
•People pursue activities that promote clean water and
natural resource stewardship.
•Waters are restored or maintained in conditions
allowing for beneficial uses.
City actions align to do the most good towards measurable,
desirable clean water outcomes leveraging creativity and
innovation.
•The city uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’ model to make progress.
•The city uses a systems approach in its implementation to consider
cumulative benefits.
•The city performs active management to improve or maintain water
clarity and chemistry at levels appropriate for urban waters.
•Pollution is managed towards achieving water resource conditions
that meet standards and support community uses.
•In-lake management practices are applied towards achieving
conditions that meet standards and support community uses.
•Clean water goals are pursued with consideration for multiple
benefits and available resources.
All people have access to water and the cultural values and
environmental benefits they provide.
•Clean water actions prioritize waters with public access.
•Clean water strategies recognize the diverse ways people value and
experience the city’s waters.
Why Establish a Clean Water Strategy?
•Waterbodies in Edina are shallow, failing to meet standards,
permanently and significantly altered by urbanization, and stressed
by climate change
•Shallow lakes can exist in one of two states – clear or turbid
Clear versus Turbid
Turbid Water
Centerville Lake, Lino Lakes,
September 2023Lake Cornelia, August 2022
Lake Cornelia, October 2020
Lakes in the turbid condition can mean that boating is less
impacted by plants, though the city and watershed district may
be issuing recreation advisories because of potential adverse
health affects from exposure to harmful algal blooms. Turbid
lakes can have more open water (plantless) views.
Clear Water
Melody Lake, August 2023
Gilbert Lake, MN (near Brainerd), July 2022
Lakes in the clear water condition support wildlife viewing,
good fish habitat, healthier lake ecology, and recreation
among native aquatic plants.
Clean Water Goals and Priorities Perspective
Clean water goals and priorities are well defined at the national, state, regional, and watershed district scale.
•National: Clean Water Act, restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation's waters.
•State: MN Pollution Control Agency set standards, assesses waterbodies. Purpose is to improve and restore impaired waterbodies.
•Regional: Metropolitan Council publishes Priority Waters List with goal to help sustainably manage regionally significant waterbodies.
•Watershed Districts: Minnehaha Creek has defined their vision for a balanced urban ecology. Nine Mile Creek works to manage, protect and enhance water resources using a lake health framework.
Clean Water Goals and Priorities – City scale
•Currently doing the minimum to meet regulatory and stakeholder
requirements
•Lack a vision for clean water
•Priorities and desired outcomes are not defined, actions don’t drive toward an
outcome
•Development of a Clean Water Strategy is included in the city’s Water
Resources Management Plan
•The vision and strategic plan would set a framework for the actions the city
undertakes
The City has the opportunity to set local priorities, service levels, and
impact the pace of achievement for clean water.
$ City budget: $ $
•Priority waterbodies:
Established by the state; expanded
upon by WDs.
•Priority pollutants/stressors:
Established by state standards -
nutrients, sediment, bacteria,
chloride, low dissolved oxygen.
Priority implementation activities:
o Meet legal requirements.
o City actions driven by minimum
requirements of the MS4 permit –
focused on regulatory
compliance, not necessarily
outcomes at the resource.
o The City responds to requests for
aquatic plant management which
makes meeting the state and WD
goals more difficult.
o WD leads and implements
projects per their lake studies.
•Pace: Determined by others.
•Outcome: Determined by others.
Detriment No/Small/Temporary
resource benefit
Some resource
benefit
Major resource
benefit
Not
considered
•Invasive purple
loosestrife control
$
•Hybrid cattail control
$$
•Adopt-a-drain
program
$
•Encouraging smart
residential lawn care
$
•CuS algaecide treatments
$
•Curlyleaf pondweed
control
$$
•Priority/enhanced
street sweeping
$
•Buffered shorelines
$$
•Regulating erosion and
sediment control on
construction sites
$$
•Control internal loading from
lake sediments – service level
and schedule defined by city
$$$
•Rough fish control –service
level and schedule defined
by city $$$
•Clean Water Infrastructure—
service level and schedule
defined by city $$$$
•Encouraging and protecting
native aquatic plants that
sequester nutrients $
•Dredging •General chemical
destruction of native
submerged plants
$
•General chemical
control of native lily
pads
$$
•General chemical
control of native
duckweed
$$
LANDSCAPEWATERBODIES Status Quo
Detriment
•Priority waterbodies:
Combination of state, WD, and
city priorities.
•Priority pollutants/stressors:
City focuses on its priorities – nutrients,
sediment, chloride.
•Priority implementation activities:
o Meet legal requirements.
o City actions driven by community-
defined priorities.
o City actions focus on outcomes at the
resource. WD leads and implements
projects per their lake studies.
o City seeks out further opportunities
to accelerate or enhance community-
defined goals in community-defined
priority waterbodies. This could be
additional street sweeping in priority
areas, targeted in-lake sediment
treatments, city-owned
infrastructure investments, higher
regulatory standards.
•Pace: Determined by city, leveraging
ongoing work of others.
•Outcome: Defined by city, in line with
others.
No/Small/Temporary
resource benefit
Some resource
benefit
Major resource
benefit
Not
considered
•Invasive purple
loosestrife control
$
•Hybrid cattail control
$$
•Adopt-a-drain
program
$
•Encouraging smart
residential lawn care
$
•CuS algaecide treatments
$
•Curlyleaf pondweed
control
$$
•Priority/enhanced
street sweeping
$
•Buffered shorelines
$$
•Regulating erosion and
sediment control on
construction sites
$$
•Control internal loading from
lake sediments – service level
and schedule defined by city
$$$
•Rough fish control –service
level and schedule defined
by city $$$
•Clean Water Infrastructure—service level and schedule
defined by city $$$$
•Encouraging and protecting
native aquatic plants that
sequester nutrients $
•Dredging
LANDSCAPEWATERBODIES
•General chemical
destruction of native
submerged plants
$
•General chemical
control of native lily
pad
$$
•General chemical
control of native
duckweed
$$
Clean Water Vision
$ City budget: $ $ $ $ $ $
Discussion - Proposed Clean Water Vision
Edina’s waterbodies are in a healthy ecosystem equilibrium, where
waters are clear, safe, and accessible.
•Prevent pollution: We control pollutants at their source and help people
do their part.
•Mitigate pollution: We build, operate, and maintain infrastructure and
take actions to capture and remove pollutants.
•Protect and restore ecological processes: We protect and restore
natural ecosystems on land and in water.
Discussion - Clean Water Strategy Values and Goals
Ecosystems are in a healthy equilibrium; water is
clear and environmental benefits are sustained.
•Water clarity improves as people use water friendly
practices.
•Water is safe for human contact.
•Waters support native plants, insects, and animals
consistent with an urban setting.
•Shorelines are stable and provide shelter for wildlife
consistent with urban lands.
People are connected to the land and water in
reciprocity, both caring for nature and enjoying the
benefits of a healthy environment.
•People access and interpret knowledge and guidance on
urban clean water goals and behaviors that promote
them.
•People pursue activities that promote clean water and
natural resource stewardship.
•Waters are restored or maintained in conditions
allowing for beneficial uses.
City actions align to do the most good towards measurable,
desirable clean water outcomes leveraging creativity and
innovation.
•The city uses an iterative ‘build, test, learn’ model to make progress.
•The city uses a systems approach in its implementation to consider
cumulative benefits.
•The city performs active management to improve or maintain water
clarity and chemistry at levels appropriate for urban waters.
•Pollution is managed towards achieving water resource conditions
that meet standards and support community uses.
•In-lake management practices are applied towards achieving
conditions that meet standards and support community uses.
•Clean water goals are pursued with consideration for multiple
benefits and available resources.
All people have access to water and the cultural values and
environmental benefits they provide.
•Clean water actions prioritize waters with public access.
•Clean water strategies recognize the diverse ways people value and
experience the city’s waters.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VIII.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2024-27: Accepting Donations Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Resolution No. 2024-27 accepting donations.
INTRODUCTION:
To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two-
thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution No. 2024-27: Accepting Donations
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-27
ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal
property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds
majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere
appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens.
Police Department
Edina Crime Prevention Fund $1,363.00 Public Safety Recognition Banquet
and other events
Edina Senior Center
Edina Lions Club $400 General Use
Brown & Greene Floral Flowers & 16 Vases Floral design and give program
Martin Luther Senior Living & Care 15 Prizes Mardi Gras Bingo event
Herself Health 35 Lunches Lunch & Learn: Purpose, Power &
Pleasure of Friendship
Vernon Terrace Gift Card to Hilltop Price for Kindness Bingo
Dated: March 19, 2024
Attest:
Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached
and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 19, 2024,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2024.
City Clerk
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VIII.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Pa Thao, Finance Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2024-21: Amending the Capital
Improvement Plan to Authorize Increase Bonding for
Community Health & Safety Center (Fire Station 2)
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution No. 2024-21: Amending the Capital Improvement Plan to Authorize Increase Bonding for
Community Health & Safety Center (Fire Station 2)
INTRODUCTION:
A public hearing took place at the March 6 City Council meeting, was posted in Better Together Edina , and
closed March 10. No public comments were received.
In June 2022, Council approved Resolution No. 2022-56 to authorize financing for up to $39,000,000 of general
obligation bonds for the land acquisition, design, and construction of the fire station project. The original plan
authorized a not to exceed $39,000,000 bonding amount. Following that meeting, preliminary design indicated the
need to increase the project budget due to cost escalations and refined scope. Final bid results were received in
December 2023 and the Council subsequently approved increasing the project budget by $8,300,000 to
$47,300,000. T he plan is amended to authorize an additional bonding amount, not to exceed $8,300,000, subject
to City Council approval for the project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution No. 2024-21: Amending CIP for Fire Station 2
Edina CIP Bonds Amendment
2024 CIP Bonds Amendment
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
ADOPTION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ISSUANCE AND SALE OF
BONDS THEREFOR
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on March 19, 2024
at 7:00 o’clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21
RESOLUTION ADOPTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF BONDS
THEREFOR
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public
corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents
attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are
a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said
corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all
documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds;
and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as
required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this ______ day of March, 2024.
_________________________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk
Councilmember _____________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption,
which motion was seconded by Councilmember ______________:
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21
RESOLUTION ADOPTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF BONDS
THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (this “Council”) of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the “City”), as follows:
SECTION 1. PUBLIC HEARING; FINDINGS. On March 6, 2024, the City held a public
hearing on the approval of the City’s Amended Capital Improvement Plan (the “Plan”) and the
issuance of capital improvement plan bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,300,000, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 (the “Bonds”), for the purpose of financing the construction
of various capital improvements identified in the Plan, including capital improvements related to
the City’s Fire Station #2 Facility Project (the “Projects”).
All parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views
with respect to the proposal to adopt the Plan and undertake and finance the Projects, and any
written comments submitted prior to the hearing were considered.
In approving the Plan, the Council considered for each project and the overall Plan:
(1) the condition of the City’s existing infrastructure, including the projected need for
repair or replacement;
(2) the likely demand for the improvement;
(3) the estimated cost of the improvement;
(4) the available public resources;
(5) the level of overlapping debt in the municipality;
(6) the relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds;
(7) operating costs of the proposed improvements; and
(8) alternatives for providing services most efficiently through shared facilities with
other municipalities or local government units.
SECTION 2. PLAN ADOPTION. The City hereby adopts the Plan.
SECTION 3. BOND AUTHORIZATION. It is hereby determined to be in the best
interests of the City to issue the Bonds to finance the costs of the Projects. If a petition requesting
a vote on issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the last
general election, is filed with City Manager within 30 days of the date hereof, the City may issue the
Bonds only after obtaining approval of a majority of voters voting on the question at an election.
Adopted this ___ day of March, 2024.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Attest:
Sharon Allison, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember ______________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Hennepin County 2,672,668,521 6.61%1,071,970,000 70,867,937
I.S.D. 270 (Hopkins)168,755,786 7.58%143,190,000 10,847,072
I.S.D. 271 (Bloomington)193,336,352 0.01%155,105,000 22,180
I.S.D. 272 (Eden Prairie)144,223,821 0.97%102,535,000 993,667
I.S.D. 273 (Edina)142,891,893 98.88%182,245,000 180,206,590
I.S.D. 280 (Richfield)73,658,938 28.73%130,840,000 37,594,388
I.S.D. 283 (St. Louis Park)92,066,383 0.02%247,260,000 61,073
Three Rivers Park District 1,911,697,254 9.24%54,980,000 5,081,581
Metropolitan Council 5,878,109,833 3.01%238,225,000 7,160,805
312,835,293 City's Total Share of Overlapping Debt
Assessor's Estimated Market Value 15,582,326,300
Multiply by 3%0.03
Statutory Debt Limit 467,469,789
Less: Existing Debt Subject to the Limit (21,130,000)
Less: Proposed CIP Bond Issue(s)(47,300,000)
Unused Debt Limit 399,039,789
Assessor's Estimated Market Value 15,582,326,300
Multiply by 0.16%0.0016
CIP Act Debt Service Limit 24,931,722
Less: Existing Debt Service Subject to the Limit (1,796,583)
Less: Estimate of Proposed CIP Bond Issue (2,674,795)
Unused Debt Service Limit 20,460,344
2022 Fire Station 2 Site & Design 17,000,000$
2023 None Anticipated -$
2024 Fire Station 2 Construction 17,945,000$
2025 Fire Station 2 Construction 12,355,000$
2026 None Anticipated -$
2027 None Anticipated -$
2028 None Anticipated -$
TOTAL 47,300,000$
2022 17,000,000$
2023 -$
2024 17,945,000$
2025 12,355,000$
2026 -$
2027 -$
2028 -$
TOTAL 47,300,000$
City of Edina, Minnesota
$17,000,000 General Obligation Temporary CIP Bonds, Series 2022B
Sources & Uses
Dated 08/25/2022 | Delivered 08/25/2022
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $17,000,000.00
Original Issue Discount (OID)(40,290.00)
Total Sources $16,959,710.00 Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (0.076%)12,947.64
Costs of Issuance 101,800.00
Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 487,333.33
Deposit to Project Fund 16,357,629.03
Total Uses $16,959,710.00
Net Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Net D/S Fiscal Total
08/25/2022 -------
08/01/2023 --317,333.33 317,333.33 (317,333.33)--
02/01/2024 --170,000.00 170,000.00 (170,000.00)--
08/01/2024 --170,000.00 170,000.00 -170,000.00 -
02/01/2025 17,000,000.00 2.000%170,000.00 17,170,000.00 -17,170,000.00 17,340,000.00
Total $17,000,000.00 -$827,333.33 $17,827,333.33 (487,333.33)$17,340,000.00 -
Capitalized
Interest
City of Edina, Minnesota
$47,300,000 General Obligation CIP Bonds
Assumes Current Market Non-BQ AAA/Aaa Rates
Estimated Sources And Uses
Dated 05/30/2024 | Delivered 05/30/2024
Series 2024A
GO CIP Bond
Series 2025A
GO CIP Bond Summary
Estimated Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $17,945,000.00 $29,355,000.00 $47,300,000.00
Total Sources $17,945,000.00 $29,355,000.00 $47,300,000.00
Estimated Uses Of Funds
Underwriter's Discount Allowance (0.50%)89,725.00 146,775.00 236,500.00
Costs of Issuance 137,000.00 171,000.00 308,000.00
Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 409,572.81 -409,572.81
2024 Construction 17,308,702.19 -17,308,702.19
2022B Redemption - Perm. Conversion -17,170,000.00 17,170,000.00
2025 Construction -11,867,225.00 11,867,225.00
Total Uses $17,945,000.00 $29,355,000.00 $47,300,000.00
City of Edina, Minnesota
$17,945,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2024A
$29,355,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025
Assumes Current Market Non-BQ AAA/Aaa Rates
Estimated Debt Service Schedule and Levy Calculation
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Net D/S
02/01/2025 --409,572.81 409,572.81 (409,572.81)--
02/01/2026 970,000.00 2.800%1,699,509.55 2,669,509.55 -2,669,509.55 2,802,985.03
02/01/2027 1,085,000.00 2.600%1,586,112.50 2,671,112.50 -2,671,112.50 2,804,668.13
02/01/2028 1,110,000.00 2.500%1,557,902.50 2,667,902.50 -2,667,902.50 2,801,297.63
02/01/2029 1,140,000.00 2.500%1,530,152.50 2,670,152.50 -2,670,152.50 2,803,660.13
02/01/2030 1,170,000.00 2.500%1,501,652.50 2,671,652.50 -2,671,652.50 2,805,235.13
02/01/2031 1,200,000.00 2.500%1,472,402.50 2,672,402.50 -2,672,402.50 2,806,022.63
02/01/2032 1,230,000.00 2.500%1,442,402.50 2,672,402.50 -2,672,402.50 2,806,022.63
02/01/2033 1,255,000.00 2.500%1,411,652.50 2,666,652.50 -2,666,652.50 2,799,985.13
02/01/2034 1,290,000.00 2.500%1,380,277.50 2,670,277.50 -2,670,277.50 2,803,791.38
02/01/2035 1,320,000.00 2.600%1,348,027.50 2,668,027.50 -2,668,027.50 2,801,428.88
02/01/2036 1,360,000.00 2.700%1,313,707.50 2,673,707.50 -2,673,707.50 2,807,392.88
02/01/2037 1,395,000.00 2.850%1,276,987.50 2,671,987.50 -2,671,987.50 2,805,586.88
02/01/2038 1,435,000.00 3.000%1,237,230.00 2,672,230.00 -2,672,230.00 2,805,841.50
02/01/2039 1,475,000.00 3.100%1,194,180.00 2,669,180.00 -2,669,180.00 2,802,639.00
02/01/2040 1,520,000.00 3.200%1,148,455.00 2,668,455.00 -2,668,455.00 2,801,877.75
02/01/2041 1,570,000.00 3.600%1,099,815.00 2,669,815.00 -2,669,815.00 2,803,305.75
02/01/2042 1,625,000.00 3.700%1,043,295.00 2,668,295.00 -2,668,295.00 2,801,709.75
02/01/2043 1,690,000.00 3.750%983,170.00 2,673,170.00 -2,673,170.00 2,806,828.50
02/01/2044 1,755,000.00 3.800%919,795.00 2,674,795.00 -2,674,795.00 2,808,534.75
02/01/2045 1,820,000.00 3.850%853,105.00 2,673,105.00 -2,673,105.00 2,806,760.25
02/01/2046 1,885,000.00 3.850%783,035.00 2,668,035.00 -2,668,035.00 2,801,436.75
02/01/2047 1,960,000.00 3.900%710,462.50 2,670,462.50 -2,670,462.50 2,803,985.63
02/01/2048 2,035,000.00 3.900%634,022.50 2,669,022.50 -2,669,022.50 2,802,473.63
02/01/2049 2,115,000.00 3.900%554,657.50 2,669,657.50 -2,669,657.50 2,803,140.38
02/01/2050 2,195,000.00 3.950%472,172.50 2,667,172.50 -2,667,172.50 2,800,531.13
02/01/2051 2,285,000.00 3.950%385,470.00 2,670,470.00 -2,670,470.00 2,803,993.50
02/01/2052 2,375,000.00 3.950%295,212.50 2,670,212.50 -2,670,212.50 2,803,723.13
02/01/2053 2,470,000.00 4.000%201,400.00 2,671,400.00 -2,671,400.00 2,804,970.00
02/01/2054 2,565,000.00 4.000%102,600.00 2,667,600.00 -2,667,600.00 2,800,980.00
Total $47,300,000.00 -$30,548,437.36 $77,848,437.36 (409,572.81)$77,438,864.55 $81,310,807.78
Average Levy:$2,803,820.96
Capitalized
Interest
105% Levy
Calculation
APPENDIX C
Hennepin County 2,336,109,435 6.68%1,065,595,000 71,157,237
I.S.D. 270 (Hopkins)148,353,842 7.75%144,830,000 11,227,366
I.S.D. 271 (Bloomington)166,358,494 0.02%140,445,000 22,752
I.S.D. 272 (Eden Prairie)124,250,639 0.99%92,635,000 913,474
I.S.D. 273 (Edina)125,283,801 98.87%183,225,000 181,151,992
I.S.D. 280 (Richfield)66,297,431 29.21%132,980,000 38,838,006
I.S.D. 283 (St. Louis Park)83,118,061 0.02%118,895,000 23,422
Three Rivers Park District 1,631,381,661 9.56%46,120,000 4,410,133
Metropolitan Council 5,197,211,231 3.00%166,860,000 5,008,470
312,752,853 City's Total Share of Overlapping Debt
Assessor's Estimated Market Value 13,796,381,100
Multiply by 3%0.03
Statutory Debt Limit 413,891,433
Less: Existing Debt Subject to the Limit (25,995,000)
Less: Proposed CIP Bond Issue(s)(39,000,000)
Unused Debt Limit 348,896,433
Assessor's Estimated Market Value 13,796,381,100
Multiply by 0.16%0.0016
CIP Act Debt Service Limit 22,074,210
Less: Existing Debt Service Subject to the Limit (1,795,700)
Less: Estimate of Proposed CIP Bond Issue (2,945,000)
Unused Debt Service Limit 17,333,510
2022 Fire Station 2 New Site 17,000,000$
2023 Fire Station 2 Construction 22,000,000$
2024 None Anticipated -$
2025 None Anticipated -$
2026 None Anticipated -$
TOTAL 39,000,000$
2022 17,000,000$
2023 22,000,000$
2024 -$
2025 -$
2026 -$
TOTAL 39,000,000$
City of Edina, Minnesota
$16,700,000 General Obligation Temporary Bonds, Series 2022
Assumes Current Market Non-BQ AAA/Aaa Rates + 35bps
Estimated Sources & Uses
Dated 08/25/2022 | Delivered 08/25/2022
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $16,700,000.00
Total Sources $16,700,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Underwriter's Discount Allowance (0.50%)83,500.00
Estimated Costs of Issuance 90,000.00
Deposit to Capitalized Interest Fund (CIF)622,353.33
Deposit to Project Site Acquisition Fund 15,900,000.00
Rounding Amount 4,146.67
Total Uses $16,700,000.00
Estimated Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF
02/01/2023 ------
02/01/2024 --622,353.33 622,353.33 (622,353.33)-02/01/2025 16,700,000.00 2.600%434,200.00 17,134,200.00 -17,134,200.00
Total $16,700,000.00 -$1,056,553.33 $17,756,553.33 (622,353.33)$17,134,200.00
Net Debt
Service
City of Edina, Minnesota
$39,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2024
Assumes Current Market Non-BQ AAA/Aaa Rates plus 150bps
Estimated Sources & Uses
Dated 01/01/2024 | Delivered 01/01/2024
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $39,000,000.00 Total Sources $39,000,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Underwriter's Discount Allowance (0.70%)273,000.00
Estimated Costs of Issuance 169,000.00Deposit to 2022 Temporary Bonds Redemption 16,700,000.00
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 21,858,000.00 Total Uses $39,000,000.00
Estimated Debt Service Schedule and Levy Calculation
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I
105% Levy
Calculation
02/01/2024 -----02/01/2025 --2,090,502.92 2,090,502.92 2,195,028.07
02/01/2026 870,000.00 3.650%1,929,695.00 2,799,695.00 2,939,679.7502/01/2027 905,000.00 3.750%1,897,940.00 2,802,940.00 2,943,087.00
02/01/2028 940,000.00 3.950%1,864,002.50 2,804,002.50 2,944,202.6302/01/2029 975,000.00 4.000%1,826,872.50 2,801,872.50 2,941,966.13
02/01/2030 1,015,000.00 4.200%1,787,872.50 2,802,872.50 2,943,016.1302/01/2031 1,055,000.00 4.350%1,745,242.50 2,800,242.50 2,940,254.63
02/01/2032 1,105,000.00 4.400%1,699,350.00 2,804,350.00 2,944,567.5002/01/2033 1,150,000.00 4.550%1,650,730.00 2,800,730.00 2,940,766.50
02/01/2034 1,205,000.00 4.600%1,598,405.00 2,803,405.00 2,943,575.2502/01/2035 1,260,000.00 4.700%1,542,975.00 2,802,975.00 2,943,123.75
02/01/2036 1,320,000.00 4.750%1,483,755.00 2,803,755.00 2,943,942.7502/01/2037 1,380,000.00 4.800%1,421,055.00 2,801,055.00 2,941,107.75
02/01/2038 1,450,000.00 4.850%1,354,815.00 2,804,815.00 2,945,055.7502/01/2039 1,520,000.00 4.950%1,284,490.00 2,804,490.00 2,944,714.50
02/01/2040 1,595,000.00 5.000%1,209,250.00 2,804,250.00 2,944,462.5002/01/2041 1,675,000.00 5.050%1,129,500.00 2,804,500.00 2,944,725.00
02/01/2042 1,755,000.00 5.100%1,044,912.50 2,799,912.50 2,939,908.1302/01/2043 1,845,000.00 5.200%955,407.50 2,800,407.50 2,940,427.88
02/01/2044 1,945,000.00 5.250%859,467.50 2,804,467.50 2,944,690.8802/01/2045 2,045,000.00 5.300%757,355.00 2,802,355.00 2,942,472.75
02/01/2046 2,155,000.00 5.350%648,970.00 2,803,970.00 2,944,168.5002/01/2047 2,270,000.00 5.400%533,677.50 2,803,677.50 2,943,861.38
02/01/2048 2,390,000.00 5.400%411,097.50 2,801,097.50 2,941,152.3802/01/2049 2,520,000.00 5.450%282,037.50 2,802,037.50 2,942,139.38
02/01/2050 2,655,000.00 5.450%144,697.50 2,799,697.50 2,939,682.38
Total $39,000,000.00 -$33,154,075.42 $72,154,075.42 $75,761,779.19
25-year Average Levy:2,942,670.05
The CITY ofEDINAThe CITY ofEDINA
General Obligation CIP Bonds
March 19, 2024 Consideration
The CITY ofEDINACIP Bonds – 2024 Amendment
www.EdinaMN.gov 2
•Fire Station #2 Project
•2022 CIP Bonding process authorized up to $39 million
$47.3 million budget approved by Council in February, 2024
•Public Hearing held March 6th to amend CIP and authorize an
addition G.O. CIP Bonds in amount not to exceed $8,300,000
•Authorization is subject to 30-day “Reverse Referendum”
Valid petition can make increase in bonding subject to referendum
Must be signed by current voters equal to at least 5% of turnout in
last municipal general election
The CITY ofEDINACIP Bonds – Financial Impacts
www.EdinaMN.gov 3
•2024/2025 $47.3 million Permanent CIP Bonds
•City of Edina’s existing facility debt and potential CIP debt levy*
Bonds anticipate $2.8 million levy impact - expected as early as 2025
•$499,021 increase from 2024-2025 adopted budget; equivalent to 0.8% levy increase
*Actual New CIP Bonds levy structure subject to future council discussion and approvals
Purpose 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Gymnasiums:392,000 392,000 392,000 398,000 - - -
Fire Station #1:403,000 403,000 403,000 406,000 406,000 406,000 -
Public Works:1,269,000 1,269,000 1,508,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000
Braemar Field:1,168,000 1,166,000 1,168,700 1,165,100 1,165,100 1,165,100 1,165,100
Subtotal:3,232,000 3,230,000 3,471,700 3,481,100 3,083,100 3,083,100 2,677,100
New CIP Bonds (Average):- - - 2,803,821 2,803,821 2,803,821 2,803,821
New Total:3,232,000 3,230,000 3,471,700 6,284,921 5,886,921 5,886,921 5,480,921
The CITY ofEDINACouncil Consideration
•Resolution Adopting Capital Improvement Plan and
Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Bonds Therefor:
•1) Amend CIP to allow for increase of up to $8.3 million in
additional General Obligation CIP Bonds for Fire Station #2 project
•2) Start a 30-day Reverse Referendum process
Expires April 18, 2024
•Future Action: Staff anticipates request to issue bonds in May /
June alongside other street and utility project bonding needs
www.EdinaMN.gov 4
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: VIII.C.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Design Option 1A for Rosland Park
Pedestrian Bridge
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Design Option 1A for Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge.
INTRODUCTION:
The current pedestrian bridge is owned and managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT). It was built in the 1960s. The bridge does not meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards
and was substantially damaged when it was struck twice in 2022 by vehicles traveling on Minnesota Highway 62.
The damage resulted in the closure of the bridge for most of 2022, until expensive temporary repairs were made
in January 2023.
There have been extensive discussions between City and MnDOT staff about a plan to replace the bridge.
Funding for the project has been secured between a successful capital bonding request in 2023 and MnDOT
Funds. MnDOT is also discussing adding a permanent 3rd westbound travel lane on Highway 62 along with a 20-
ft tall noise wall.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Rosland Park Staff Report
Rosland Park Ped Bridge Staff Presentation
March 12, 2024
Mayor and City Council
Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Approve Design Option #1A for Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
Executive Summary:
Staff is seeking approval of Option #1A Switchback Ramps to the East for a new pedestrian bridge over
Highway 62 for the following reasons.
1. ADA accessible 100% of time.
2. Typical highway crossing for pedestrians and cyclists commuting or recreation.
3. Does not relocate the bridge and creating new sight line issues.
a. Not located on the front side of houses or in front of bay windows.
4. Switchbacks create slower speed for wheeled vehicles such as scooters, bicycles, etc.
5. Best fits with available right-of-way.
6. Fits with future noise wall and allows some adjustment if necessary.
7. Minimal maintenance required compared to elevators.
8. Snow removal completed by city staff with existing equipment.
9. Less tree removals than all options except elevators.
10. Within available budget.
Following approval of a design option, staff would create a community engagement plan to develop the
aesthetic features of the bridge such as railings, the finish on the ADA ramps, and lights that meet MnDOT
requirements.
Information / Background:
The Crosstown Pedestrian Bridge in Edina is a piece of critical transportation infrastructure that must be
replaced. The bridge connects the northeast and southeast quadrants of the community by providing a safe
overpass bridge above Minnesota Highway 62. It is a critical connection for pedestrians and cyclists from
northern Edina to safely access Rosland Park and its amenities, including the Edina Aquatic Center.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
The current pedestrian bridge is owned and managed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT). It was built in the 1960s. The bridge does not meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standards and was substantially damaged when it was struck twice in 2022 by vehicles traveling on
Minnesota Highway 62. The damage resulted in the closure of the bridge for most of 2022, until expensive
(temporary) repairs were made in January 2023.
The current bridge is a major barrier to the goals of the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan that ties
into the Regional Bike and Pedestrian Networks:
• To increase the number of Edina residents, workers and visitors who walk or bike for
transportation, health, fitness, and recreation in the city.
• To support city, resident and elected officials’ work and efforts to offer the highest quality of life and
best experience of their city to Edina residents, businesses, workers, and visitors.
• To create an all ages and abilities network.
• To develop an Inner Trail Loop that would serve Edina schools, community destinations, parks, and
regional destinations.
At the November 21, 2023 City Council Meeting, staff presented a recommendation on how to replace the
existing Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge with a new bridge. Staff analyzed 11 options and a do-nothing
option. A criteria-based matrix was created to describe impacts of the various design options. Staff analysis
balanced impacts to create a recommendation to replace the existing bridge with a new 10-ft wide bridge
with ADA compliant ramps. Council directed staff to collect more comments from the community, provide
lifecycle costs, and provide some images of the potential new bridge.
At the December 19, 2023 City Council Meeting, staff provided a project update and summary of the
neighborhood meeting of December 14, 2023. Staff suggested developing more constructability reviews and
better renderings of the options.
Community Engagement:
Staff have solicited written comments from the community twice on the BetterTogetherEdina project page.
Once in December 2023 and again in March 2024. We have also met with various residents on April 12,
2023, November 8, 2023, December, 14, 2023, and January 11, 2024, in addition to many emails and phone
calls.
December 2023 Comments.
A BetterTogetherEdina project page was created. Documents were provided with details on 11 replacement
options and a do-nothing option. A criteria-based matrix was created to describe impacts of the 12 design
options. The following project goals were communicated; improve safety and mobility for all users, create
ADA compliant pedestrian and bike route, improve connectivity between the residential neighborhoods and
Rosland Park, limit impacts on residential and park properties, trees, and road operations with an eye on
long term operations and maintenance.
Participants were asked to provide feedback while considering the following questions.
STAFF REPORT Page 3
a. What factors or considerations are important to consider with a new pedestrian bridge?
b. How would a new pedestrian bridge over Highway 62 help me be healthy, active, and social?
c. How do you see yourself using a new pedestrian bridge?
d. How can the bridge foster a welcoming and inclusive space?
e. What stories do you have about the existing bridge?
25 comments were received. The raw comment data is included in the council packet. Comments detailed
the following.
• Elevators = For and Against
• ADA access is a must.
• Tunnel instead – not feasible with water table and lakes / ponds in the area.
• Provide bike or other wheeled access without elevator or stairs.
o Wheelchairs, strollers, tandem bikes, rollerblades
• Do nothing.
• Roof – still need snow and ice management w/ blowing snow and railings unless we create a skyway.
(lots of other issues)
March 2024 Comments
The BetterTogetherEdina project page was updated with updated concepts and an updated criteria-based
matrix. There were 6 options considered during this review including a do-nothing option. 3 of the 5 build
options were analyzed previously. Option #7 and Option #8 were ideas from the January 11, 2024 resident
meeting. 15 graphical renderings were created to better understand how an option would fit in the space.
All of those can be found in the appendix.
Approximately 14 comments were received both through BetterTogetherEdina project page and via email.
The deadline to submit comments was extended per a resident request. Some residents were not able to
directly input comments to the project page but instead sent emails to council and staff. All comments are
provided in the appendix.
• Elevators: Comments both for and against the option.
• Option #1A: Comments both for and against the option.
• Do not support long straight ramp as shown in Option #5B, #7 and #8.
• Need aesthetic treatments with any of the ramp options (Yes staff will engage the community on
this).
• Noise Wall: Comments both for and against a noise wall (This is a separate MnDOT Project).
• Leave the bridge in its existing location.
• Concerns for trees, space, bike speeds, and safety with all the options.
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Staff Comments on Options / Concepts:
Staff is proposing a steel truss bridge over Highway 62 with ADA compliant concrete access ramps. A steel
truss bridge can span longer distances and allow the removal of the bridge support in the center of Highway
62. This allows more flexibility for MnDOT with any future improvements to Highway 62. No aesthetic
treatments have been determined but the images in the appendix provide ideas of aesthetics. Staff intends to
develop a community engagement plan to develop the aesthetic features of the bridge such as railings, the
finish on the ADA ramps, and lights that meet MnDOT requirements after an option is selected.
Staff has provided written comments on the options below based on the criteria-based matrix and
constructability analysis.
Do Nothing
Staff do not consider this an option because it does not provide ADA access or increase the height of the
bridge over Highway 62.
Option #1A Switchback Ramps to the East
With this option, the bridge is in approximately the same location as the existing bridge. The additional
switchback ramps are located east of the Wooddale path and within the widest portion of the right-of-way
between 64th Street and Highway 62. The bridge, ADA ramp, and 20-ft tall noise wall will all fit at this
location and provide ability to adjust during final design.
Option #1A: Switchback Ramp and Noise Wall
Based on resident feedback, the future noise wall is shown between 64th Street and the ADA ramp. The new
ADA ramp is adjacent to a side yard and side of a house, not directly in front of any houses or bay windows.
The noise wall will have an opening for access to the Wooddale path. This will have a slight impact on noise
reduction. The noise wall will screen most of the views of the new bridge and ADA Ramps. The railings
adjacent to the ADA ramp at the top of the ramp and some portions of the bridge will be visible above the
noise wall.
STAFF REPORT Page 5
There will be tree removals associated with this option and the installation of a future noise wall. Our
forestry division has identified one oak tree that most likely needs to be removed. The other trees are of
lesser quality and will also most likely need to be removed.
Option #1A: View from Wooddale Path
Option #1A: View from Highway 62
STAFF REPORT Page 6
Impacts on Rosland Park are minimal. An adjustment to the frisbee golf hole will be required. The overhead
power lines will either need to be buried or raised about the bridge. Tree impacts are minimal.
Option #5B Bridge moved 470-ft West with Long Straight Ramps
With this option, the bridge is located 470-ft feet west of the existing bridge in a new location. The ADA
ramp is located west of the Wooddale path and within the narrowest portion of the right-of-way between
64th Street and Highway 62. The bridge, ADA ramp, and 20-ft tall noise wall will all fit at this location but
with no room for adjustments during final design. There are major concerns related to space with this
option.
Option #5B: Bridge Moved 470-ft West with Long Straight Ramps
Option #5B: ADA Ramp and Noise Wall Cross Section
STAFF REPORT Page 7
Based on resident feedback, the future noise wall is shown between 64th Street and the ADA ramp. The new
ADA ramp is located directly in front of three houses with their bay windows and adjacent to one additional
side yard and side of a house. The noise wall will have an opening for access to the Wooddale path. This will
have a slight impact on noise reduction. The noise wall will screen most of the views of the new bridge and
ADA Ramps. The railings adjacent to the ADA ramp at the top of the ramp and some portions of the bridge
will be visible above the noise wall.
This option provides an opportunity for wheeled vehicles (specifically bicycles and scooters) to achieve high
speeds when traveling down the long ramps. Given the sharp turns required at the ends of each ramp and
the shared-use nature of the facility, staff is concerned that this option may negatively impact user safety.
There will be some tree removals associated with this option and the installation of a future noise wall. Our
forestry division has identified no substantial tree removals. Most are small young trees or volunteer trees
that have been established near the chain link fence and MnDOT right-of-way.
Impacts on Rosland Park are greater than Option #1A. More trees need to be removed, a greater portion
of the overhead power lines need to be relocated or buried and the long ADA ramps will be directly
adjacent to and above the pickleball and tennis courts.
Option #5B: View from Millers Lane
STAFF REPORT Page 8
Option #5B: View from Highway 62
Option #6A Elevator Buildings with Stairs at the Existing Location
With this option, the bridge is in approximately the same location as the existing bridge. The additional
elevator buildings are located east of the Wooddale path and within the widest portion of the right-of-way
between 64th Street and Highway 62. Another elevator building is located in Rosland Park. The bridge,
elevator, and 20-ft tall noise wall will all fit at this location and provide the ability to adjust during final
design.
Option #6A Elevator Buildings with Stairs at the Existing Location
STAFF REPORT Page 9
Based on resident feedback, the future noise wall is shown between 64th Street and the ADA ramp. The new
elevator building is adjacent to a side yard and side of a house, not directly in front of any houses or bay
windows. The noise wall will have an opening for access to the Wooddale path. This will have a slight impact
on noise reduction. The noise wall will screen most of the views of the new bridge and elevator. The
elevator building will be the tallest of the options. It and some portions of the bridge will be visible above
the noise wall.
This option only provides ADA accessibility when the elevators are functioning. The elevators will require
routine maintenance, at a minimum, which could mean temporary closures and therefore no accessibility.
There will be tree removals associated with this option and the installation of a future noise wall. Our
forestry division has identified one oak tree that most likely be saved with this option. The other trees are
of lesser quality and may need to be removed.
Impacts on Rosland Park are minimal. An adjustment to the frisbee golf hole will be required. The overhead
power lines will either need to be buried or raised about the bridge. Tree impacts are minimal.
Option #6A: View from Wooddale Path
STAFF REPORT Page 10
Option #6A: View from Highway 62
Option #7 Bridge moved 470-ft East with Helical Ramp South near Aquatic Center
With this option, the bridge is located 470-ft feet east of the existing bridge in a new location. The ADA
ramp is located east of the Wooddale path and within the widest portion of the right-of-way between 64th
Street and Highway 62. The bridge, ADA ramp, and 20-ft tall noise wall will all fit at this location and provide
some ability to adjust during final design.
Based on resident feedback, the future noise wall is shown between 64th Street and the ADA ramp. The new
ADA ramp is adjacent to two side yards and side of a house, not directly in front of any houses or bay
windows. The noise wall will have an opening for access to the Wooddale path. This will have a slight impact
on noise reduction. The noise wall will screen most of the views of the new bridge and ADA Ramps. The
railings adjacent to the ADA ramp at the top of the ramp and some portions of the bridge will be visible
above the noise wall.
STAFF REPORT Page 11
Option #7: Bridge moved 470-ft East with Helical Ramp South near Aquatic Center
This option provides an opportunity for wheeled vehicles (specifically bicycles and scooters) to achieve high
speeds when traveling down the long ramps. Staff is concerned that this option may negatively impact user
safety.
There will be more tree removals associated with this option and the installation of a future noise wall
compared to the other options.
The helical ramp located in Rosland Park has substantial impacts to many oak trees. It may also impact the
new clean water filter built by the watershed district north of the aquatic center parking lot. This is one of
the most expensive options. There are also structural concerns with construction foundations near Lake
Otto and Swimming Pool Pond.
Option #8 Bridge moved 470-ft East with Switchback Ramp South near Aquatic Center
With this option, the bridge is located 470-ft feet east of the existing bridge in a new location. The ADA
ramp is located east of the Wooddale path and within the widest portion of the right-of-way between 64th
Street and Highway 62. The bridge, ADA ramp, and 20-ft tall noise wall will all fit at this location and provide
some ability to adjust during final design.
Based on resident feedback, the future noise wall is shown between 64th Street and the ADA ramp. The new
ADA ramp is adjacent to two side yards and side of a house, not directly in front of any houses or bay
windows. The noise wall will have an opening for access to the Wooddale path. This will have a slight impact
on noise reduction. The noise wall will screen most of the views of the new bridge and ADA Ramps. The
STAFF REPORT Page 12
railings adjacent to the ADA ramp at the top of the ramp and some portions of the bridge will be visible
above the noise wall.
This option provides an opportunity for wheeled vehicles (specifically bicycles and scooters) to achieve high
speeds when traveling down the long northern ramp. Given the sharp turns required on the north ramp and
the shared-use nature of the facility, staff is concerned that this option will negatively impact user safety.
There will be more tree removals associated with this option and the installation of a future noise wall
compared to the other options.
Option #8: Bridge moved 470-ft East with Switchback Ramp South near Aquatic Center
The ADA ramp and switchback ramps located in Swimming Pool Pond and Rosland Park have impacts to
oak trees. It may also impact the new clean water filter built by the watershed district north of the aquatic
center parking lot. This is the most expensive option. There are also structural concerns with construction
foundations near Lake Otto and in Swimming Pool Pond. This option also creates an entirely new bridge
over W 64th St which would be the City’s responsibility to maintain.
Cost / Funding / Maintenance:
The available funding for the project is $5-$6M. This funding is a combination of state general funds
appropriated directly to this project and federal MnDOT funds. The City secured $3M of appropriated funds
that expire on June 30, 2027. MnDOT has promised an additional $2-3M to fund the remainder of the
project. The initial review is that elevators will not negate the appropriated funds.
The estimated project cost that includes engineering and construction is $5M - $6M for all options except
Options #7 and #8. Options #7 and #8 may be more than the available funding. Constructing ADA
compliant ramps (typical) or two elevators have similar initial construction costs. Long-term maintenance
costs between ramps and elevators are substantial. Elevators are 8-times more expensive to maintain. It is
STAFF REPORT Page 13
estimated that the ramps require approximately $2,500 per year to maintain versus $20,000 per year for
elevators. Over a 100-year period, the ramps would require $250,000 for maintenance versus $2,000,000
for the elevators in 2023 dollars.
Elevators require annual inspections, HVAC systems, electricity, cables, and replacement in cycles. There is
also a safety and security component that is not included in this analysis with having an indoor space such as
an elevator building. There is also a concern with unhoused individuals using this climate-controlled space
for shelter. Other metro area transit agencies are seeing elevators used as restrooms, sleeping, drug use,
etc. In fact, the electors at the 35W and Lake Street Transit Station have been out of order so often, Metro
Transit is designing ADA ramps for that location. It should be noted that elevators require maintenance and
do malfunction. When repairs are needed, ADA access is no longer available until the elevator is put back
into service. With ramps, ADA access is available nearly 100% of the time. None of the maintenance costs
listed above includes snow and ice control.
Appendix:
A. Examples of Streel Trust Bridges and Snow Removal Machine
B. October 2023 Matrix and Concepts
C. February 2024 Matrix and Concepts
D. February 2024 Graphical Renderings
E. Values Viewfinder Memo
F. BetterTogetherEdina Project Page Raw Comments
G. Comments Provided via Email
STAFF REPORT Page 14
Appendix A
1. Examples of Steel Truss Bridges
Bridge in Columbia Heights, MN
Highway 55 Bridge in Marshall, MN
STAFF REPORT Page 15
Highway 7 Bridge in St. Bonifacius, MN
Highway 55 in Golden Valley, MN
2. Example of Snow Removal Machine
Typical Edina Sidewalk Snow Removal Machine
STAFF REPORT Page 16
Appendix B: October 2023 Matrix and Concepts
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Decision Matrix
Br. No. 27520 - Over TH-62 and W 64th St at Rosland Park
Date: 10/25/2023
OPTION 1A
SHEET 1 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 1A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:38 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
60'-0"
OPTION 1B
SHEET 2 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 1B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:41 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE60'-0"
OPTION 2A
SHEET 3 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 2A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:44 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
OVERHEAD SIGN
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE 60'-0"
OPTION 2B
SHEET 4 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 2B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:46 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
OVERHEAD SIGN
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE60'-0"
SHEET 5 OF 11
OPTION 3
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 3.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:48 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
TOP OF DECK = 26'-0" HIGH
DOUBLE RAMP LOOP
60'-0"STANDARDS.
CLEARANCE AND RAMP DESIGN
NOT FEASIBLE DUE TO VERTICAL
NOTE: THIS OPTION IS CONSIDERED
SHEET 6 OF 11
OPTION 4
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 4.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:52 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPEPROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL60'-0"PARK/COURSE.
HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO
ALTERNATIVE TIE-IN LOCATIONS WOULD
RAMP SLOPE AND TIE-IN LIMITS.
NOT FEASIBLE AS SHOWN DUE TO
NOTE: THIS OPTION IS CONSIDERED
OPTION 5A
SHEET 7 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 5A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:54 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
OVERHEAD SIGN
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE60'-0"
OPTION 5B
SHEET 8 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 5B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:56 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RWRW
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE 60'-0"
SHEET 9 OF 11
OPTION 5C
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 5C.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:57 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
RW
OVERHEAD SIGN
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
60'-0"
SHEET 10 OF 11
OPTION 6A
FEETSCALE
60300
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 6A.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:58 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
RW
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
LANDING AND STAIRS
ELEEVATOR BUILDING WITH
60'-0"LANDING AND STAIRS
ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH
SHEET 11 OF 11
FEETSCALE
60300
OPTION 6B
H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T4129397\CAD\MS\Bridge\study\option 6B.dgnalec.lorenz10/6/20232:45:59 PMpdf_bridge.pltcfgMINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE OF STRUCTURE
IDENTIFICATION NO. XXX
DES.
CHK.
DR.
CHK.
XXXXXX
XXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
APPROVED:
R
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION
XXX
7533 SUNWOOD DRIVE N.W.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303
Phone: (763) 433-2851
Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
PRELIMINARY PLAN
DATE
XXXXX
STATE PROJECT NO. JOB NO.
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW
COUNTY XXXX
CITY: XXXX
XXXXXXX
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT:
XXXXXXXX
RESIDENT ENGINEER:
XXXXXXXX
ROAD DESIGN UNIT:
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 EB
CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WB
W 64TH
W 64TH ROSE CTRW
RW RW
RW
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
VALLEY VIEW EXIT
PROPOSED RAMP @ 4.95% SLOPE
MIN. 15'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. 17'-6"
CRITICAL CLEARANCE
TRUSS SUPPORTED ON PIERS
PROPOSED PREFABRICATED STEEL
PED BRIDGE
REMOVE EXISTING
LANDING AND STAIRS
ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH
60'-0"
STAFF REPORT Page 17
Appendix C: February 2024 Matrix and Concepts
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Decision Matrix
Br. No. 27520 - Over TH-62 and W 64th St at Rosland ParkDate: 2/15/2024
Description
No Impact Improvement Sig. Improvement Minor Impact Major Impact Not Feasible
Do Nothing Option #1A Option #5B Option #6A Option #7 Option #8
CRITERIA KEEP EXISTING BRIDGE SWITCHBACK RAMPS EAST
SUPERSTRUCTURE MOVED 470' WEST WITH STRAIGHT RAMPS
ELEVATOR BUILDINGS WITH STAIRS
SUPERSTRUCTURE MOVED 470' EAST WITH HELICAL RAMP SOUTH NEAR AQAUTIC CENTER
SUPERSTRUCTURE MOVED 470' EAST WITH SWITCHBACK RAMP SOUTH NEAR AQAUTIC CENTER
Limit Bike Speeds No Bikes Switchback Straight Long Ramps Elevator Helix Switchback
Bike and Pedestrian ADA Not ADA Compliant Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance Elevator must remain in-service Permanent Compliance Permanent Compliance
Local Roadway Operations No Change No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact
Impacts to Residential Properties No Change
North Ramp at Window Level
towards Side of House in a New Location. Noise Wall
Screen View
North Ramp at Window
Level towards Front of Houses in a New Location.
Noise Wall Screen View
New building and height required to support an
elevator
North Ramp at Window
Level towards Side of House in a New Location.
Noise Wall Screen View
North Ramp at Window
Level towards Side of House in a New Location. Noise
Wall Screen View
Impacts to Residential Trees No Change Trees Removed (w/ 1 Oak)Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed
TH62 Operations Bridge Collisions
Continue Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards Meets Design Standards
Future Auxiliary Lane / Noise Wall Median Pier Conflict Project readily accomodated Project accomodated but
challenging
Project readily
accomodated
Project accomodated but
challenging
Project accomodated but
challenging
Noise Wall Location and Performance
Noise Wall placed between bridge and W
64th street. Screens
resident views
Noise Wall placed between
bridge and W 64th street.
Screens most resident views
Noise Wall placed between bridge and W 64th street.
Screens most resident
views
Noise Wall placed between bridge and W 64th street.
Screens most resident
views
Noise Wall placed between bridge and W 64th street.
Screens most resident
views
Noise Wall placed between bridge and W 64th street.
Screens most resident
views
Impact to Rosland Park Trees No Impact Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed Trees Removed (Oaks)Trees Removed (Oaks)
Rosland Park Impacts & Operations No Change Disc Golf course rerouting &
Trail work Aesthetics near Courts No Impact Disc Golf course rerouting & stormwater filter system
challenges
Disc Golf course rerouting & stormwater filter system
challenges
Aesthetics No Change Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity,
Minimizes Structures Aesthetic Opportunity Aesthetic Opportunity
Structure Maintenance and Operations Future Collision Repairs Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent Specialty / High Cost &
Frequency Low Cost / Infrequent Low Cost / Infrequent
Right-of-Way Impacts No Change No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact No Impact
Utility & Signage Impacts No Impact OH Power South OH Power South New Service to Elevator
Needed OH Power South OH Power South
Construction Cost No Immediate Costs Mid-range Mid-range Mid-range Highest Highest
2/15/20243:09 PM
I
C 0, u <r
C 0 +-o_ 0 / U) C 0 +-o_ 0
u Q) u :J u Q) L ' en N '
0 ' q-N 0 ('-J / >, u :J +-U) / Q) 0, u
L m 0, / 4-V1 0 2 +-/ o_ 0 <r Q) u 0, / u m L n _o m ' n '.': 4-
q-u ':: f---o_ q-
0 >, / z +-2 L ' Q) _c: u 0 ' 0 q-<r N 0 0 N 0 E '-w / 0 m _c: '-:r: f---N
JOB NO.
0 30 �---SCALE
60 I FEET
ROAD DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxxx
RESIDENT ENGINEER: xxxxxxxx
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxx
STATE PROJECT NO.
MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE or STRUCTURE
203'-0" PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS OVER TH62.
386'-0" SWITCHBACK RAMP SOUTH AT ~4.95%
-5 TOT AL SPANS, 3 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,
I TURNAOUND PIER, I MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO
TRUSS, I INTEGRAL ABUTMENT
430'-0" SWITCHBACK RAMP NORTH AT ~4.95%
-6 TOT AL SPANS, 4 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,I TURNAROUND PIER, I MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TOTRUSS, I INTEGRAL ABUTMENT
BRIDGE DECK AREA,13450 SQ.FT.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
OPTION IA
GENERAL PLAN ANO ELEVATION IOENTIF'ICATION NO. XXX
APPROVED:
DES.XXX
CHK. XXX
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
DR. XXX
CHK. XXX xxxxx
SHEET 1 OF 5
C: 0, lJ m U7
C: 0 +-o_ 0 / U) C: 0 +-o_ 0
lJ Q) u :J lJ Q) L ' U7 N '
0 ' q-N 0 ('-J / >, lJ :J +-U) / Q) 0, lJ
L m 0, / 4-V1 0 2 +-/ o_ 0 « Q) u 0, / lJ cn L n _o cn ' '.': 4-
q-D f---o_
0 >, / z +-2 L ' Q) _c: u 0 ' « 0
0 0 E w / 0 _c: :r: f---
2
n ':: q-
q-N 0 N '-en '-N
Ct, PIER &
PIER SHOWN FOR STUDY DEPICTION. ACTUAL DESIGN AND DETAILS TBD.
z :i
184'-0" TRUSS SPAN
ASSUMED Ct, BRIDGE� PROFILE
<t_ W. 64TH STREET EL. 869.14± Cl Ct, BRIDGE
z :i <t_ LB. TH 62 EL. 871.27:t Cl <t_ BRIDGE
0 15 30 r----SCALE I FEET
<t_ W.B. TH 62 EL. 871.28± a Ct, BRIDGE
EDGE or PAVEMENT W.B. TH 62 NORTH
GENERAL ELEVATION <OPTION 2 SHOWN, OPT ION 1 SIMILAR>
JOB NO.
PIER SHOWN FOR STUDY DEPICTION.ACTUAL DESIGN AND DETAILS TBD.
OISE WALL LOCATION
EXISTING FENCE LINE
ROAD DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxxx
RESIDENT ENGINEER: xxxxxxxx
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxx
STATE PROJECT NO.
MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE or STRUCTURE
184'-0" PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS OVER TH62.
590'-0" STRAIGHT RAMP SOUTH AT ~3.56Y.
-6 TOTAL SPANS, 5 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,
1 MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO TRUSS, 1 INTEGRAL
ABUTMENT
467'-0" STRAIGHT RAMP NORTH AT ~4.95Y. -5 TOT AL SPANS, 4 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,
1 MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO TRUSS, 1 INTEGRAL
ABUTMENT
BRIDGE DECK AREA, 15513 SQ. FT.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
OPTION 58
GENERAL PLAN ANO ELEVATION IOENTIF'ICATION NO. XXX
APPROVED:
DES.XXX CHK. XXX
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
OR. XXX CHK. XXX xxxxx
SHEET 2 OF 5
I
C o; " « Ul
C 0 +-o_ 0 / U) C 0 +-o_ 0
lJ Q) u :J lJ Q) L ' en N '
0 ' q-N 0 ('-J / >, lJ :J +-U) / Q) o; lJ
L m o; / 4-V1 0 2 +-/ o_ 0 « Q) u 0, 2 / lJ Q_ c-m L 0 n _o q-m ' n '.': 4-
q-lJ ':: f---o_ q-
0 >, / z +-2 L ' Q) _c u 0 ' 0 q-« N 0 0 N 0 E '-w / 0 m _c '-:r: f---N
JOB NO.
0 30 �---SCALE
60 I FEET
ROAD DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxxx
RESIDENT ENGINEER: xxxxxxxx
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxx
STATE PROJECT NO.
MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE or STRUCTURE
184'-0" PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS OVER TH62.
ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH EXTERNAL STAIRS SOUTH
ELEVATOR BUILDING WITH EXTERNAL STAIRS NORTH
BRIDGE DECK AREA:2300 SQ.FT.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
OPTION GA
GENERAL PLAN ANO ELEVATION IOENTIF'ICATION NO. XXX
APPROVED:
DES.XXX
CHK. XXX
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
DR. XXX
CHK. XXX xxxxx
SHEET 3 OF 5
C O' D r--
C 0 +-o_ 0 / U) C 0 +-o_ 0
D Q) u :J D Q) L ' en N '
0 ' q-N 0 ('-J / >, D :J +-U) / Q) O' D
L m O' / 4-V1 0 2 +-/ o_ 0 « Q) u 0, / D r--m L n _o m ' '.': 4-
q-D f---o_
0 >, / z +-2 L 'Q) _c u 0 ' « 0
0 0 E w / 0 _c :r: f---
2
N q-n ':: q-
q-N 0 N '-m '-N
It_ PIER &
PIER SHOWN FOR STUDY DEPICTION. ACTUAL DESIGN AND DETAILS TBD.
IL I
9 ,n
190'-4" t TRUSS SPAN
ASSUMED It_ BRIDGE� PROFILE
It_ W. 64TH STREET EL. 868.51t
z i
11 It_ BRIDGE
GENERAL ELEVATION
JOB NO.
FEET EDGE or PAVEMENT W.B. TH 62 NORTH 9 ,n
PIER SHOWN FOR STUDY DEPICTION. ACTUAL DESIGN AND DETAILS TBD.
ROAD DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxxx
RESIDENT ENGINEER: xxxxxxxx
BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxx
STATE PROJECT NO.
MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE or STRUCTURE
190'-4" PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS OVER TH62.
543"-I" HELICAL/STRAIGHT RAMP SOUTH AT ~4.87% -10 TOTAL SPANS, 9 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,I MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO TRUSS, I INTEGRALABUTMENT
500'-6" STRAIGHT RAMP NORTH AT ~4.27% -6 TOT AL SPANS, 5 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,I MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO TRUSS, I INTEGRALABUTMENT
BRIDGE DECK AREA,15425 SQ. FT.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
OPTION 7
GENERAL PLAN ANO ELEVATION IDENTIF'ICATION NO. XXX
APPROVED:
DES.XXX CHK. XXX
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER DR. XXX CHK. XXX xxxxx
SHEET 4 OF 5
C O' D m
C 0 +-o_ 0 / U) C 0 +-o_ 0
D Q) u :J D Q) L ' en N'
0 ' q-N 0 ('-J / >, D :J +-U) / Q) O' D
L m O' / 4-V1 0 2 +-/ o_ 0 « Q) u 0, 2 / D m L n _o q-m ' n '.': 4-
q-D ':: f---o_ q-
0 >,/ z +-2 L ' Q) _c u 0 ' 0 q-« N 0 0 N 0 E '-w / 0 m _c '-:r: f---N
PIER SHOWN f'OR STUDY DEPICTION. ACTUAL DESIGN AND DETAILS TBD. ::i. i
It_ E.B. TH 62EL. 870.00± o <t, BRIDGE
175"-3" TRUSS SPAN
ASSUMED <t_ BRIDGE PROFILE
z i
9
It_ W.B. TH 62EL. 869.8-4± o It_ BRIDGE OISE WALL LOCATION
-1-""'d::==::±:::;-7;;--________ _,r ___ co ____________ -==--=-:ri=::=-::7�f.;tr �--j=�-=:;r-=.--j ;1_:iJ.l;7rEXISTING FENCE LINE
yl EDGE or PAVEMENT
GENERAL ELEVATION
JOB NO.
W.B. TH 62 NORTH
0 15 i---c-SCALE
30 I FEET
ROAD DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxxx RESIDENT ENGINEER: xxxxxxxx BRIDGE DESIGN UNIT: xxxxxxx
STATE PROJECT NO.
PROJECT NO.
DESIGN DATA
PROPOSED TYPE or STRUCTURE
175'-3" PREF' ABRICATED STEEL TRUSS OVER TH62.
720'-0" SWITCHBACK RAMP SOUTH AT VARYING GRADE % -11 TOTAL SPANS, 9 INTERMEDIATE PIERS,I TURNAOUND PIER, I MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO TRUSS, I INTEGRAL ABUTMENT
-493'-6" STRAIGHT RAMP NORTH AT ,,4.-42% -6 TOT AL SPANS, S INTERMEDIATE PIERS,I MULTIPLE LEVEL PIER TO TRUSS, I INTEGRAL ABUTMENT
BRIDGE DECK AREA,17363 SQ. FT.
RAMSEY, MINNESOTA 55303 Phone: (763) 433-2851 Email: Ramsey@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
PRELIMINARY PLAN BRIDGE NO. XXXXX
OPTION 8
GENERAL PLAN ANO ELEVATIONIOENTIF'ICATION NO. XXX
APPROVED:
D .XX
H . X
SEC: X TWP: TXXN , RXXW COUNTY XXXX CITY: XXXX
STATE BRIDGE ENGINEER
X
C . XX
O,.TE xxxxx
SHEET 5 Of' 5
STAFF REPORT Page 18
Appendix D: February 2024 Graphical Renderings
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONTEXT MAP
W. 64th St.
RoSeland PaRkRoSe Ct.BRookvieW ave.MilleRS ln.St. JohnS ave.aShCRoft ln.W. 64th St.
lake CoMelia
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 1 (SWITCHBACK RAMPS) - BIRDS EYE LOOKING WEST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 1 (SWITCHBACK RAMPS) - VIEW FROM HWY. 62 LOOKING WEST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 1 (SWITCHBACK RAMPS) - VIEW FROM W. 64TH ST. LOOKING SOUTH
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 1 (SWITCHBACK RAMPS) - VIEW FROM HWY. 62 LOOKING EAST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 2 (LONG RAMPS) - BIRDS EYE LOOKING WEST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 2 (LONG RAMPS) - VIEW FROM HWY. 62 LOOKING WEST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 2 (LONG RAMPS) - VIEW FROM W. 64TH ST./MILLER LOOKING SOUTH
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 3 (ELEVATORS) - BIRDS EYE LOOKING WEST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 3 (ELEVATORS) - VIEW FROM HWY. 62 LOOKING WEST
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 3 (ELEVATORS) - VIEW FROM W. 64TH ST. LOOKING SOUTH
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BRIDGE SPAN
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BRIDGE SPAN LIGHTING
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 1 (SWITCHBACK RAMPS) - VIEW FROM W. 64TH ST. LOOKING SOUTH
HIGHWAY 62 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CONCEPT 3 (ELEVATORS) - VIEW FROM W. 64TH ST. LOOKING SOUTH
STAFF REPORT Page 19
Appendix E: Values Viewfinder Memo
Values Viewfinder
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
DATE: June 30, 2023
TO: Chad Millner
FROM: Values Viewfinder Team (Jeff Brown, Grace Hancock, MJ Lamon, Heidi Lee)
RE: Tool Utilization Report Out
Introduction to Values Viewfinder
The goal of the Values Viewfinder is to incorporate City Council
values in City decision-making processes. The Values Viewfinder team
developed a tool to help decision-makers understand, assess, and
communicate the impact, opportunities and trade-offs of a given decision
using the lens of community engagement, health in all policies, race &
equity and sustainability. The four disciplines collectively achieve
community well-being.
The Values Viewfinder tool includes three sections:
1. Framing: To orient the user to common terms and to set a baseline
understanding of the initiative, key interested parties and considerations
2. Questions: a community well-being matrix questionnaire to identify
opportunities and tradeoffs
3. Evaluation: To understand early in an initiative how to assess how the goals and strategies of an
initiative are met by the resulting decision from using this tool.
Purpose and scope of this process
The purpose of using the Values Viewfinder tool here is to understand – early in the initiative – how design
elements for the Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge can incorporate community well-being values. The Values
Viewfinder tool is part of this process as a tool to facilitate discussion and surface questions and ideas that
may have been overlooked without its use.
Through facilitated conversations the tool helps staff and decision makers to understand the goals,
drivers, and ways to evaluate progress on these goals while achieving community well-being through this
stage of the project.
Participants included: Engineering Department staff and interns, including project lead.
PART 1: Project Framing
The Engineering department group identified the goals/objectives of this project stage, drivers behind why
this decision must be made, interested parties who should be involved, and successes when this stage of
the project is complete. Below is the information collected from the Engineering department workshop.
Initiative Type: Project
Goals/Objectives • Accessible Crossing
• Safe
• Placemaking with the park
Drivers • Part of the Twin Loops/Pedestrian and Bike Master
Plan
• Clearance for traffic under the bridge
• Trees
• Maintenance & ownership
• Cost
Interested Parties • Transportation and Parks & Recreation Commissions
• Parks and Public Works Departments
• MN DOT
• Park users
• Neighborhood
• Cyclists
• 62 commuters
• Habitat/animals
What does success look like? • Safe, comfortable, accessible crossing
• Facility used year-round.
• Compliments the neighborhood and park amenities.
• Clearance for vehicles
• Not overdesigned (function vs fashion)
• Natural landscaping/low chloride demand
• Resident/community content and pleased
PART 2: Questions
Staff brainstormed how this decision relates to the following questions from the perspective of community
well-being:
PART 3: Evaluation
In any decision-making process, assessment should be included to evaluate if the goals and strategies of
the decision are met. The definition of success looks different for all decisions; however, it is necessary for
the decision makers and stakeholders to define success and the evaluation or data points that support
success or unpack gaps in the strategies. In the discussion of evaluation, the Engineering Department was
guided back to the overall goals, objectives and defining what project success looks like in the Framing
section. The participants indicated the three primary goals are:
• Having an accessible crossing for users
Community
Engagement
Health-in-all-
Policies Race & Equity Sustainability
Benefits & Access
(What are
potential positive
benefits/access opport
unities created by this
action?)
• Fosters use of the park/a more inclusive community
• Place-making
• Welcoming aesthetic
• Winter access
• Park connection
• More exercise and time outside
• Improve walkability
• Increased access to the park
• Connect the Twin Loops
• Increased access to the park
• Accessibility – rollable
• More accessible for bodies of all abilities and for all ages
• Park amenities more accessible for nearby communities
• Opportunity to improve landscaping
• Reduced repairs
• Reduce vehicle use with more convenient bike options
• Ability to walk instead of drive
• Alternate transit options for city amenities like aquatics center
• people more invested in protecting environment
Barriers & Impact
(What are
potential negative
impacts/consequences/
barriers created by
this action?)
• Neighbor complaints due to more pedestrian traffic
• Neighborhoods most directly benefit over other parts of city
• Construction complexities: how do you phase construction so the bridge will be inaccessible for the least amount of time? Construction noise issues
• Chloride pollution
• Emergency access issues if needed on ped bridge
• Potential point of congregation for too many people, i.e. July 4
• Fast cyclists may dissuade walkers
• Perception of safety concerns with bridge users and surrounding community
• Large footprint (eyesore?)
• Excess salt can damage ecosystem (snow management/chloride)
• Removal of quality or established trees
Other
Considerations
• Vocal minority opposed to increased pedestrian traffic in area
• Could this project trigger more asks for bridges elsewhere? Is this the best location to meet our goals?
• Increase in future maintenance costs
• Heated versus plowed bridge
• Net embodied carbon
• External partners and permitting needs
• The pedestrian bridge is safe
• Place making with the nearby park and trails
With the primary goals in mind, the achievement of success looked:
• Safe, comfortable, accessible crossing
• Facility used year-round.
• Compliments the neighborhood and park amenities.
• Clearance for vehicles
• Not overdesigned (function vs fashion)
• Natural landscaping/low chloride demand
Resident/community content and pleased
In the Evaluation section, the measures of success provide a foundation to dig deeper of what qualitative
and quantitative data can be collected. For example, qualitative data can be feedback from community
members or staff members their overall feeling of safety or connection to inclusion in the pedestrian
bridge; this data is from the respondents’ perspective or would be considered narrative stories.
Quantitative data is numerical value that is collected such as the number of community members who
access the bridge or has there been a change in the number of people using the bridge to access the
Aquatic Center. The table below provides some examples of numerical and narrative data that can be
collected through each lens to that provide insight the success of the Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge.
Conclusion- Stacked Benefits vs Trades-Offs
One key outcome of this tool exercise is to identify overlapping opportunities and tradeoffs between
these values.
Through conversation, workshop attendees highlighted the following overlapping opportunities:
Value What are you measuring?
What type of
data do you
need? (stories
or numbers)
Data source (database/ software)
Community
Engagement
Inclusive community/
Feeling of inclusion
Welcoming aesthetic
Park connection and
access in all seasons
Stories &
numbers
User Experience Survey
Tracking of surrounding trails/parks
Referencing of community input of
design/landscape
Health-in-all-
Policies
Walkability
Connection to the loop
Increased access to park
Stories & numbers
Community/neighborhood surveys
Complaints – increase/decrease
Camera/videos
Social media surveys
Race and
Equity
Feeling safe
(understanding various
definitions of safety)
Accessibility
Stories &
numbers
Bike traffic usage
User survey to include emotions
Police Data – complaints, calls for
service
Sustainability
Reduce vehicle use,
convenience to bike,
walkability
Impact on ecosystem
Reduced repairs
Numbers
User information from Placer/Cell
Phone tracker
Aquatic Center user survey
Storm water capture, etc.
• Workshop attendees identified a stacked opportunity that a pedestrian bridge can provide
inclusive access to city amenities and different neighborhoods. Inclusive access means that
pedestrians can easily bike, walk or otherwise roll across the bridge. (values optimized: Health,
Engagement, Race & Equity)
• Workshop attendees identified a stacked benefit of increasing walkability and rollability,
encouraging convenient transit other than by vehicle. (values optimized: Health, Sustainability)
• Workshop attendees identified a stacked benefit of providing greater access to the park,
specifically. (values optimized: Health, Race & Equity)
Workshop attendees also discussed barriers that affect two or more values:
• Workshop attendees discussed the perception of safety with increased pedestrian traffic in the
neighborhood. Attendees discussed the need for the pedestrian bridge to feel safe for all users,
as well as neighbors. (values affected: Community Engagement, Race & Equity)
• Workshop attendees identified a tradeoff related to winter snow management. If the bridge is
not designed to support mechanical snow plowing, then physical and likely some chemical snow
management using chloride will be needed (values affected: Sustainability, Race & Equity, Health,
Community Engagement)
• Workshop attendees discussed the diversity of potential users, and how to encourage all types of
users without dissuading others, like fast cyclists dissuading stroller users. (values affected:
Community Engagement, Health, Race & Equity)
Other considerations:
• Attendees discussed the importance of managing an inclusive community engagement process to
ensure voices of potential bridge users as well as neighbors are heard.
• Attendees discussed the importance of managing construction in a way that minimizes
neighborhood impact and minimizes amount of time that the bridge is inaccessible.
In conclusion, this process identified the top opportunities to maximize the expression of City values in this
decision. It also identified the top tradeoffs that decision-makers must consider when determining next
steps. Finally, this tool’s findings lay the foundation for the next decision-point in the Rosland Park Pedestrian
Bridge project, and how to incorporate community well-being throughout.
STAFF REPORT Page 20
Appendix F: BetterTogetherEdina Project Page Raw Comments
28 November 23
Becky Thacher-Bell
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
28 November 23
Tracie
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
I live in the neighborhood near the Rosland park bridge. I use the bridge frequently to a
ccess the park. I just watched the November 21 Council Meeting and am concerned ab
out the proposed 1A switchback plan. The aesthetics, long ramp for walkers and possi
ble speeding bikes are a major concern, as well as the loss of trees on both sides. Alth
ough there are concerns regarding an elevator, it would be aesthetically pleasing, conv
enient for wheelchair users and strollers as well as bikers. I often bike in the neighborh
ood and am not concerned about waiting for the elevator. In my observations there are
more pedestrians who use the bridge than there are bikers. (yes, that's because it is ha
rd to get bikes up the stairs) The confusing part for me in the discussion about the bridg
e is that it is so biker focused. Yet there are no bike trails in Rosland park. As Major Ho
vland stated, this bridge could be special and an attractive structure in Edina rather tha
n just an uncreative bridge with a ramp. Snow removal is one of the reasons for not usi
ng an elevator because of the size of the equipment. Maybe a smaller snowblower cou
ld be used for this bridge? It seems as if snow is driving the design. I frequent Lifetime
Fitness and they have an attractive elevator with stairs enclosed that works in all seaso
ns. I appreciate the difficulty in making this decision with all the different factors and yet
I feel it is a very important, visual structure that will impact the whole community. Thank
you, Becky Thacher-Bell
I live near the proposed Rosland Bridge. it seems to me that snow removal and bikes a
re driving the plans. If the bridge is covered, removal concerns may be reduced. An Edi
na covered bridge would certainly be an interesting community aesthetic contribution w
hile alleviating the removal issue. A cover or roof could facilitate a narrower path, allowi
ng more design, cost and location options - elevators as well. I really prefer the sound
wall be kept nearest to the highway (option B, I believe) keeping it further from our hom
es and allowing some room for vegetation. (with or without gap) Thank you, Tracie Bell
PS: I note that some ped bridges have chain link side fencing that continues over the t
op - not beautiful to my eye. If a roof is installed, its cost must be compared with cost of
snow removal equipment capable of doing the job during winter. If a narrower path is u
sed, a smaller plow is appropriate.
29 November 23
Denny
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
01 December 23
flyerguymn
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
01 December 23
HighlandsBob
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
There are two options for the new pedestrian bridge over Hwy 62: one has long ramps
and the other has an elevator and steps. Both options are ADA compliant which is a pri
mary reason for spending over $6 million to build a new bridge. I favor the elevator and
steps over long, dangerous ramps. Ramps would need to be a total of over 400 feet in l
ength. A football field is 300 feet long. It could be a switchback design or straight, but it
still totals more than a football field in length before getting to the beginning of the bridg
e. On the other side, it would be another football field in length from the end of the brid
ge to the ground. EVERY pedestrian, bike, child, baby carriage, wheelchair, scooter, sk
ateboard, dog walker and person with walking difficulties will have to use the same very
long ramp to access the bridge. The ramps will have a 4.95% slope to climb up and the
same slope to go down at the other end. Does someone pushing a wheelchair or walki
ng with difficulty want to climb up the long ramp and then down the long ramp on the ot
her side? I don't think so. Imagine the difficulties of climbing up this long ramp and, eve
n worse, going down the ramp you are sharing with speeding bikes, skateboards and s
cooters zooming past you. It is dangerous!! The other option is an elevator AND steps.
The elevator would be used by anyone not able or wanting to use the steps. The steps
would be used by the overwhelming majority of the people wanting quick access to the
bridge. Remember, with ramps, there are no steps available and EVERYONE must use
the long, dangerous ramps. Elevators are used for other bridges and they do work. The
consultant has not determined the cost of the elevator option, but the very long ramps
are certainly expensive. The Mayor, City Council and citizens want this bridge to be an
attractive, safe, useable asset for Edina that will make all of us proud. The elevator/stai
r option does that. The long, dangerous ramps do not! I often use the bridge and have l
ived here for over 25 years. If the ramp option is selected, I will not feel safe on them a
nd will not use them in the future. If all the residents who now use the bridge are inform
ed and asked their opinion, I'm confident they will agree with me. Unfortunately, a very
small minority of the residents and bridge users are aware of the ramp vs elevator disc
ussion. Please don't rush the decision until they are fully informed. This is an important,
expensive and lasting project. Let's do it right. Thank you for your consideration. Denny
S.
If you remove the non-ADA-compliant/design standards options (which should be a non
-starter) and the impractical elevator options (high cost, mechanical complexity, doesn't
work for all styles of bikes/trikes/cargo bikes/group rides/etc...., single point of failure fo
r ADA access), then the choice is obvious: Option 1A. It is equal to or better than all ot
her remaining plans on all dimensions save for the very minor impact of needing to rero
ute a bit of the disc golf course.
Thank you for the extensive analysis of the available options. I fully support Option 1A.
Some of the other options are acceptable, but none of the others addresses all of the is
sues as well. I like to bike from my home in NW Edina to locations in SW Edina, an d c
urrently I go out of my way to use the Nine Mile Creek trail since there is no more direct
safe bike route across 62. I used to carry my bike up the stairs to the existing bridge, bu
t I have a heavier bike now, and I'm older and not as strong, so can't do that any longer
. The new bridge would enable me to get out of my car and bike more places, with posit
ive impacts on my overall fitness and health. Thanks again
01 December 23
lfarnam
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
02 December 23
Edina Joe
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
02 December 23
Jeff Nowak
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
Please, please don’t do an elevator! Can you imagine trying to get a tandem bike into a
n elevator? Or if you had a group of bikers? It may satisfy ADA, but not serve the public
.
Design 1a seems the best and most feasible to achieve the desired outcomes with mini
mized footprint and impact to the park, trees, etc. at a reasonable cost. Elevator option
s aren't really feasible and sustainable, especially for bikers The new bridge should be
ADA compliant and allow for easier bike access across the bridge. Right now, the bridg
e can work for pedestrians, but is difficult for those trying to bring a bicycle across the b
ridge and prohibitive for those with disabilities that can not do stairs. Although a new bri
dge could provide better bicycle access, it would be important to note at the entrance to
Rosland park that the trail around the Lake Cornelia is meant for walking, not biking. I c
an see a new more accessible bridge bringing additional people to Rosland Park and t
o the Wooddale/Valley view area restaurants, etc. It would also make it much easier for
kids that want to bike to school to Southview or Our Lady of Grace to have easier bike a
ccess to those destinations for those that live south of Highway 62 and East of Hwy 10
0.
I highly value the current bridge and use it around 2-4 times per week year round, typic
ally for running, but sometimes for biking, and when my kids were younger, biking with t
hem to the pool. To me personally, the value of a new bridge would be that it would rem
ain operational and I would no longer feel that I had to scan 62 for tall trucks before cro
ssing. Also, since any of the proposals would be at least as functional as the current str
ucture, I would continue to use them. Having said the above, as a resident of the city, I
am strongly in favor of spending the time and money to make the bridge ADA complian
t and think that it would also be nice if it were easier for people on bicycles (especially b
ikers on either end of the age spectrum, for whom carrying their bike up and down stair
s is a challenge). It would not make sense to me to invest in alterations that do not mee
t ADA standards, and options 3 and 4 have already been deemed not feasible. I do not
see a significant difference from the standpoint of those who use the bridge between a
straight long ramp and a switchback or helix at the same grade, nor which direction the
ramp is directed. Since all of the other ramp options (which I think are functionally equi
valent for the user) have significant downsides noted on the decision matrix, this seem
s to be a choice between three options: 1. No change, remain ADA non-compliant and
wait for the next collision and repair. 2. Option 1A (switchback ramps east). 3. Option 6
(elevator/stair combination, or elevator/stair combination on one side and ramp on the
other). Though I would personally use the bridge equally regardless of which of the 3 w
ere chosen, I think that replacing the current bridge with "Option 1A" is the best option.
In addition to the much higher up-front and ongoing maintenance costs with an elevato
r option, elevators would be more difficult for those on bicycles than the ramps, I presu
me that anyone who is able to use the trails and bridge can also use the ramps, and tim
es of elevator malfunction leave the bridge suddenly ADA non-compliant until the repai
r can be done.
02 December 23
Tedley
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
03 December 23
Bob S
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
03 December 23
Matt Teasdale
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
03 December 23
Denny
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
03 December 23
MayerHighrise
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
04 December 23
Jonathan C
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
I agree with the recommended option 1A. Makes total sense for providing the ADA sol
ution. The distance to walk is part of the ADA world. If one is walking this route, what is
a few more yards of walking. Another option would be to add stairs along with the ramp
s, which seems excessive and costly. Ramps are safe and just a sloped sidewalk. I am
puzzled by people who are freaking out about them. They have been a staple of the A
DA world for decades. Also, I fail to understand that some people see this as driven by
bike and snow concerns. People and bikes share a number of sidewalks and trails in th
e metro, with few or no issues. It isn't like this is a major highway for bikes. Yes, some
bikers AND pedestrians aren't into sharing, but my experience is that most people in ou
r community are respectful. Maybe add signage requesting bikers to walk their bikes w
hen pedestrians are on the bridge? Putting in elevator(s) is nuts, as it will be expensive
in initial cost and with on-going maintenance. It may be a good solution for a very small
number of people, but would be a headache for most users. It would mean no ADA sol
ution when the elevator is broken, which will be often. For most of the neighborhood, a
nd this includes at least up to Golf Terrace (which is me), another bit of walking on the r
amp is not a big deal. Hopefully, the beauty of an artistic solution will make the walk me
morable. Thanks for asking input and for the city's work on this.
Do not favor any spending to modify existing bridge. This is not a critical community ne
ed. Like my home budget, i can choose to do anything but not everything. Ask the city c
ouncil to stop this project as the public health needs of the Hwy 62 expansion and soun
d wall have too significant an impact to this project and exponentially benefit public saf
ety.
Please include missile, or some other projectile based system, to stop vehicles from hit
ting bridge and putting it out of commission. If this is not feasible, could also make it tall
er. Open to either option.
Please remember that any ramp will be more than one football field long and EVERY p
erson using the bridge MUST use the ramp, both to get to the bridge and to get off of it.
An elevator would have steps in addition, so people using the bridge would have the c
hoice of using the elevator or using the steps as they now can do.
Why not build a tunnel under Hwy 62? It would be less expensive and better than a bri
dge. Use Elon Musk’s The Boring Company to dig the tunnel.
The most important factor for replacing the bridge would be to improve the bikeability of
the bridge. Currently, you have to carry your bike up and down. Connecting a more con
venient bike option across 62 would give people access to the water park and Southdal
e area instead of driving.
04 December 23
JAH
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
04 December 23
Blumeys
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
05 December 23
MindyA
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
07 December 23
Mary Gunderson
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
I like 2B, 4, and 6A. I am wondering if the Hwy could dip lower so that achieving the AD
A slope would be easier? As a pedestrian in a climate like ours (both hot and cold), it is
nice to get to your desitination faster instead of meandering. Some people do not have
the option to drive, so a direct route is appreciated. I feel the ramps are really long in m
ost of the drawings. The elevator would be a top choice but my guess is that it will be o
ut of order often and then nolonger ADA compliant. An elevator plus ramp & stairs
might be best. It would also be nice if the bridge itself would be wide with landscape op
portunities. Another person suggested a tunnel which could work but please include to
ns of lighting and landscaping!
Please make the new bridge ADA compliant. Please consider: 1. Can the City please s
olicit groups whose members identify as physically disabled so that we can include thei
r voices in this discussion? 2. Would appreciate hearing from parents pushing strollers,
too. 3. Our fear regarding elevators is when they break down, how will mobility challen
ged people get back across if stranded on the opposite side of home? 4. We’ve heard f
rom bicyclists and pedestrians in this thread. How will the designs affect rollerbladers?
Stairs have been a real barrier and would continue to necessitate tiptoeing or removal
of the rollerblades. Blades in an elevator will work; better make ceiling tall! Maybe guar
drail on the ramps so that bladers can go down slowly without wearing their brake whe
el?
I'm excited to have a way to get safely by bike to Rosland park! This bridge is much bet
ter than the alternative of Valley View Road under 62, but the steps currently make it ve
ry challenging with a bike. Could the ramp option be combined with a stair option to ad
dress some of the concerns of pedestrians who don't want to walk a long ramp? The el
evator option may be better for wheelchairs and pedestrians, but the size could be a li
mitation for bicycles and groups of people together - in addition to the added maintena
nce costs and expense of construction. I endorse the 1A option. Can the frontage road
on Rosland Park be restripesd to more safely accommodate bikes? If so, the would be
a better option for some than putting pedestrians and bikes on the narrow paths in the
park. Some consideration would need to be made at the end of the ramp on the park si
de to make it easy to access the road and not just the paths. Great work looking at thes
e options!
Glad consulting and planning are underway. Pleased that great design is a top priority.
I walk the adjacent path on the north side lmost days and cross the bridge regularly. 1.
Bikers could use the elevator, right? Or continue to use the stairs with a channel for tire
s. Good point that Rosland Park doesn’t have any bike paths. Still, an important route t
o using city streets on either side. 2. The elevator could be a great asset and add to de
sign quality. Mechanical reliability needs study. As does risk of possible ongoing vandal
ism. Can video monitoring be installed? 3. Neither residents nor the city staff and coun
cil can make a fair assessment without knowing relative costs. I want to know more abo
ut costs for ramp vs elevator and more about plans for maintenance and monitoring. 4.
ADA compliance is critical and long past due. 5. How about a contest to name the brid
ge? Mary
08 December 23
AaaCee
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
09 December 23
Lee W
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
10 December 23
hansj
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
10 December 23
Mike here
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
I would like the pedestrian path to not cross the disc golf course. Looking at option 1A,
the south ramp is extended east to tie into the existing path. For option 1A, I would inst
ead rather see the bottom half of the ramp extended to the west. Then the path off the r
amp would go between the oak and the tennis courts to rejoin the existing sidewalk. Ho
le #3 of the disc golf course could be moved slightly east as well.
I recommend against the designs with elevators. Anything mechanical is prone to probl
ems and added maintenance and/or repair cost. I also think designs with long straight r
amps going East on the North side of Highway 100 with the new bridge to the East of th
e existing one should not be selected. This will minimize the likelihood that drivers mer
ging onto Highway 100 West-bound from Valley View will be distracted by activity on th
e bridge. Because the are merging from below the elevation of Highway 100, not above
it, those drivers have a shortened distance and time to calculate their merge because t
hey can't see West-bound traffic as early as drivers on the 3 previous ramps onto West
-bound Highway 100 Finally, as someone who was married to someone in a wheelchai
r, I strongly support installing a wheelchair-accessible ramp. Such a ramp will also mak
e it much easier for bicycle riders to get their bicycles across Highway 100. While there
are grooves on the side of the stairs of the existing bridge to help bicycle riders, they ar
e inconvenient and difficult for children to use. Even children with tricycles could use an
y of the proposed designs.
I would opt for elevator if possible. Can you imaginge being in a wheelchair, pushing s
omeone in a wheelchair, being someone who uses a walker or having a gaggle of child
ren with little bikes traveling an extremely long ramp to get to the bridge? Thats not a gr
eat proposition. Also the covered bridge does make sense. During the winter especially
. I know when I run in the winter that many times the HWY 100 walking bridge by the C
ommunity Center is not plowed or very icy. The covered bridge is a good idea. One las
t thought, Art. Make the bridge beautiful. Make it something that is attractive to look at.
Thank you for providing the study results – the graphics and various options are very h
elpful. My recommendation is to use Option 2A: “Spiral ramp” on the park side with rev
ersing-ramp on the north side of the road. I prefer the spiral ramp for two reasons Comf
ort and Safety: Comfort: the simple reason that a pedestrian’s journey on the “reversing
ramp” style requires that person to “walk away from the destination” before having to re
verse course in order to get to the bridge. The “spiral ramp” reduces this “walk away” fe
eling. Safety considerations: The straight ramp on the north side of the road is required
for limited space options. For the ramp on the park-side, however the spiral ramp syste
m is recommended. Straight ramps introduce exposure to a bike/skateboard safety iss
ue. Either the long or with a single U-turn adds a safety issue, speed of descent can be
a problem, unavoidable on the north side of 62. On the park side, bike-riders will be les
s inclined to zoom down the hill with potential crashes at the U-turn or colliding with pe
destrians going the opposite direction. Mike W
11 December 23
PrairieGirl
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
11 December 23
Constance
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
11 December 23
Colleen Curran
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
1. Prefer Design Option 1B with curved corners on the ramp. Square corners are more
difficult to navigate. NO ELEVATOR, please--the City does not maintain what it already
has, nor is there ever proper snow clearance on that bridge and the paths leading to it.
2. I have seen parents struggle to get their kids in strollers over the current bridge, esp
ecially those larger kids with physical challenges. I am extremely fit, but have struggled
to get a bike up the steps myself. A new bridge that is ADA-compliant will make it easie
r for everyone. I would walk and bike over that bridge quite often. 3. A bridge is mostly
utilitarian and should accommodate all, as in any good universal design. ''Welcoming''
and ''inclusive'' are irrelevant, faux terms.
Before any decision can be made about which design option is the best to present to M
nDot, our city council and residents should first have access to accurate drawings with
elevations and 3D visuals to show the true impact between what staff believes is best a
nd what residents would prefer. The line drawings are inadequate and the matrix does
not provide enough information on important details such as comparative costs. Sure o
ne design over another may logically and initially cost more, but it could be the best lon
g-term decision to meet most of the project goals. If, instead, this decision is based upo
n the current sketches and matrix, then Option 6B (elevator on north side with ramps o
n south side) is the best choice to accommodate the lack of building space on the north
and respect privacy, reduce conflict points and improve safety. True, an elevator will re
quire maintenance, but those costs should be accommodated in the long-term project
budget. Many other bike-friendly cities have built pedestrian bridges over highways usi
ng elevators including Portland and the Denver-area. It can be done. Making this critica
l and longstanding decision about the best option for a new ADA-compliant pedestrian
bridge is more important than meeting MnDot's preferred deadline and will allow for an
attractive landmark.
The Rosland Pedestrian Bridge project is a unique opportunity to create a safe and ext
raordinary landmark for Edina. I'm in favor of 6b - the elevator. An elevator provides a s
afe alternative to a long ramp, so bikes need to stop and slow down before entering the
small intersection at 64th Street, the Wooddale Path and Rose Court. Contrary to the D
esign Matrix, which states this will have "no impact" on the nearby residential propertie
s, Design IA with the switchback ramp - keep in mind that is two levels of ramp - is very
close to a driveway and nearby windows of homes, resulting in a loss of privacy. The D
esign Matrix states the elevator is more expensive, but no actual or even estimated cos
ts are provided to compare the elevator with a long ramp. The Mayor, Council and the
public should be provided that cost information. If initial and ongoing costs are so signif
icant, I wonder how it is the MOA has had elevators in its exterior ramps for the last 30
years or why Southdale put in an elevator to connect the lower level parking with the u
pper level parking near Lifetime Fitness. I have seen photos of what other communities
have done with bridges and elevators - it would be easier to make an elevator building
attractive than the proposed switchback ramp. With the addition of the planned perman
ent lane addition and sound wall on the north side of 62, there is simply not space on th
e north side to allow for a long ramp the length of a football field and still create safe co
nnections for all pedestrians - the disabled, walkers, bikers and parents with strollers. T
hank you for taking the time to ask for public comments. This is an important and long-l
asting decision for the city and needs careful consideration. Colleen
02 March 24
Ciaso2024
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
04 March 24
AaaCee
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
04 March 24
AaaCee
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
04 March 24
RJS
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
04 March 24
RJS
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
05 March 24
Ciaso2024
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
I think the elevator concept 3 would be the best option because it would leave the bridg
e as it is without changing the footprint and the trees would be left alone, however the c
ost of maintenance of the elevator may be an issue. I don't like concept 2 because it w
ould have a larger footprint and the bridge would look ugly and intimidating in a quiet n
eighborhood. My 2nd choice would be concept 1 the two switchbacks going east I don'
t think it would look as intimating concept 2. I know there was discussion about maybe
going a little further east and crossing over highway 62 at an angle by the swimming po
ol pond getting people closer to the pool and play area can we get a concept for that op
tion or was it not feasible to do?
You say "Click here for updated graphics and here for the replacement decision matrix"
but when I do that I get the following: AccessDenied Request has expired 300 2024-02
-21T20:27:19Z 2024-03-04T22:08:52Z 63J36SKBYDT972KB LVK1gZIc1UUJ5X66kafl
v8HecTP00pVC2KPigS0NK5AyyNIT2GePduDlF3EkfSae2P2oiTvce7E=
I do not like Concept 2. A long ramp will be unsightly. A ramp with a switch back would
look better.
Thanks for your work providing the information for the various options. We live on Mille
rs Lane. We support option 1A which keeps the bridge in the current location with the s
witch-back ramps to the east. Other than the elevator concept, option 1A has the least i
mpact on any of the properties located in the area. We do not support locating the bridg
e to the west. While the elevator concept keeps the bridge in the current location, maint
enance of the elevator seems problematic.
Thank you for providing good project information for comment. We live on Millers Lane.
We support option 1A with the bridge remaining in it's current location and switch back
ramps on the east side. Other than the elevator option, Option 1A has the least impact
on area houses. The elevator concept will require significant ongoing maintenance and
may not be reliable. We do not support moving the bridge to the west. The ramps are t
oo long and could invite some dangerous uses. The current location of the bridge is a n
atural extension of the Wooddale trail. The bridge offers critical access to the park and
other amenities south of the Crosstown. We look forward to the new bridge.
I like the option with the Elevator with no wall. As I stated in my previous comment it do
esn't change the footprint like the other two options. Please leave the bridge as is.
05 March 24
RJS
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
05 March 24
Colleen Curran
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
05 March 24
Mary Gunderson
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
07 March 24
AaaCee
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
07 March 24
AaaCee
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
Thank you for providing the information for comments. We live on Millers Lane and sup
port option 1A with the switch backs to the east. This leaves the bridge in the current lo
cation with the least impact of the ramp options on houses in the area. The elevator opt
ion, while leaving the bridge in the current location, seems like it will require significant
maintenance and may be unreliable due to periods when it is not working. We do not s
upport moving the bridge to the west.
After reviewing the additional renderings of the possible designs for the Rosland Park
Bridge, I am even more convinced that the elevator with stairs proposal, 6B, is the right
design. As the additional renderings demonstrate, the footprint of the elevator is much
smaller than any of the ramps, saving trees, maintaining privacy for the neighbors and
with ample room for the northbound turning lane on Hwy 62 and the Sound Wall. In ad
dition, the sleek modern look of the elevator dramatically raises the aesthetic of the Ros
land Bridge project. I understood that the SW LRT project has a couple of elevators an
d that an attempt was going to be made to connect with that project manager on their e
levators. What was the result of that discussion? Most importantly, the safety of pedest
rians, people with disabilities and bikers will be best served by the elevator given the n
arrow intersection at 64th Street, Wooddale Path, and Rose Court. Also, please ensure
that the construction of the bridge and the improvements to Hwy 62 and the Sound Wall
occur in a close sequence, not years apart. This should result in less construction cost
s or problems and more peaceful enjoyment of the neighborhood. Finally, given the fact
that additional information has been added to BTE yesterday, March 4, and to date only
one other person has provided comments on any of the additional information, which re
nderings were not provided until March 1, I suggest you extend the comment period to
close of business, March 11. There would still be ample time to prepare for the Council
Meeting on March 19.
The ramps are ALOT of concrete. To go with that option, it would be best to have a nota
ble design—let it be a gateway to Edina. Otherwise it’s just ugly and utilitarian.in place
of trees and ground cover … and admittedly weeds. The elevator is seeming like a bett
er idea. The light rail elevators are a key resource to watch and chance to talk to engin
eers and designers. They’ve had to consider vandalism, mechanics, winter snow and i
ce, etc. Access. An elevator is access. Period. I can see the path becoming more crow
ded with that option (and I’ve liked it not so busy the last few years) but we need to con
sider future needs of the community. Aesthetics matter too.
I do not support any design with long straight ramps. A switchback ramp has less visua
l impact on the neighborhood and is better looking.
In the Oct 2023 decision matrix, the construction cost for option 1A was "Mid-range" an
d 6A was listed as "Highest". But in the Fed 2024 decision matrix, the construction cost
for both Option 1A and 6A is "Mid-range". It would be more useful to just have the cons
truction estimates that you are using in order to make a valid comparison between 1A
and 6A. And the annual Maintenance and Operations cost for 6A would be useful to ha
ve as well.
08 March 24
Liz Moore
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
08 March 24
Becky Thacher-Bell
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
10 March 24
Ari
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
One of the goals of this project is to limit impact to the residents. The park trees and pe
ople that live around here, also road operations. I vote for the bridge to stay where it is
at today. The flow from the path right to the bridge and the park. I have talked to the pe
ople walking from the path right to the bridge and to the park and are walking down the
street to go over the bridge. They want it to stay where it is. They don't want long ramp
s down to Miller Lane walk from the path doesn't make any sense. People want it wher
e it is. No elevator because if it breaks down. Have it go to the east or north , no wall. L
ong ramps is not safe for kids by the streets. Elevator upkeep, people hanging around
and city going to keep it up. (Transcribed by Engineering Coordinator, Liz Moore)
I agree that the elevator is the best option for the many reasons given by the pervious
comments. It has been helpful to view the graphics that were presented in an attractive
way, but not realistic since the trees will be taken down for ramp construction. The elev
ator does not require them to be removed. It is safer and at a comparable cost (except
for maintenance) to any ramp. As described in previous comments, there is a lot going
on where the Wooddale walking path and 64th street converge. Cars and trucks go bac
k and forth through there everyday. An elevator is a shorter distance. Walkers will not h
ave to walk up a long ramp on both sides of the bridge to get across. With the option of
an elevator, there will be stairs. There will not be an option of using stairs with the ramp
s. Privacy will be maintained for those people living near by. It’s just a good thing all ar
ound. As was also pointed out, the aesthetics of the area will be preserved with an elev
ator. Since MNDOT will be in charge of when the sound wall gets built, it makes sense t
o wait until the wall construction has been confirmed so bridge construction can be coo
rdinated.
Options 1A is still the best option.
11 March 24
DLT
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
11 March 24
Liz Moore
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Option 1A is the best followed by 5B. The elevator is a no go as you can't guarantee it
will always be in service and could lead to crime and vandalism.
Please leave the Rosland Bridge in its current location. Moving its location further west
on 62 will bring safety issues. Distraction of the bridge or activity on the bridge could le
ad to "driver's error". The design with the long ramp is an eye sore. We can do better. T
he switch back ramp is better. The now existing pedestrian path makes for a good flow
to the enhance of the bridge. Changes would make it less efficient. We need to commit
to a pleasing and future focused design. Are we ready to decide now or maybe take a l
ittle more time for impact and reflection? We do have a good start. Respectfully, J.T. (T
ranscribed by Engineering Coordinator, Liz Moore)
11 March 24
Janelle
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
11 March 24
Mike Kao
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
I strongly prefer option 6a (elevator and stairs) or option 0 (do nothing) since they are t
he least change to the current bridge footprint, and to the neighborhood. Option 1a - sw
itch back ramps east is my second preference. I really DO NOT want option 5B (bridge
moved to the west). That would destroy the neighborhood, which is already being nega
tively impacted by the road reconstruction project (Concord B and C)). JMP
A large factor to moving to the Concord neighborhood, on Millers Lane, was due to the
existence of the bridge that made the park, courts, and lake accessible. Of the options
being considered, my first preference would be Option 1A. While 6A is a close second.
All other options would drastically alter the asthetics that currently make the neighborh
ood approachable and/or significantly reduce the ease to access the courts and trails.
The consideration of a noise wall could have an equally negative effect. If the wall was
no more than 10 feet tall, I would consider it. If it were any higher, and taking into consi
deration the trees, the Independence Day fireworks show that we view from Millers Lan
e could no longer be visible. The anticipation, charm and spectacular family (and neigh
borhood) moment could not be replicated. All said, the more change that occurs the mo
re unattractive it would be to live here. Which could be detrimental to the resale evaluat
ion of our homes, which could trigger a lot more public anger. Tread carefully.
11 March 24
Constance
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Thank you for taking time to provide the updated graphics--much improved over just lin
es on a page. It is beyond obvious the best concept solution that meets most of your pr
oject goals is #6A/Concept3 (Elevators with stairs). Although none of the concepts are
perfect, #6A/Concept 3 is ADA compliant; is the safest option; and is the least problem
atic for the property owners who live within feet of the new bridge. None of the concept
s protect the trees so the new renderings are deceiving in that regard. The drawings sh
ould have publicly depicted what engineering has stated: that all the trees on the north
side will be removed. This factor makes the case even stronger for #6A/Concept 3 sinc
e any privacy currently afforded the north side will be eliminated. The proposed sound
wall is years away and the budget yet to be approved. Both of the ramp options only ad
d more safety concerns with accidents waiting to happen: The switchback version does
not take into account the third lane expansion on the north side of highway 62 and plac
es the ramps dangerously close to the traffic lanes. As pedestrians enter the ramp, the
y are facing speeding cars. The long ramps are tempting and inviting raceways for skat
eboard and bike races. Further, in previous public meetings when photos of compariso
n pedestrian bridges in the metro area were presented, none of those examples were l
ocated as close to single family homes or jammed into such a tight space as exists wit
h this proposed bridge on the north side of highway 62. Option#6A/Concept 3 is the onl
y solution that physically fits the space and meets the primary reason for this new bridg
e: by federal law, a new bridge must be ADA compliant. Yes, there will be maintenance
issues, but knowing that now will allow the city to plan ahead. If the council decides aga
inst the elevator option, then I would encourage choice "A" from above: Do Nothing.
11 March 24
BCP
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
11 March 24
BCP
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
Vast expanses of concrete would degrade both the neighborhood and the park to which
the bridge is intended to provide access. A 5% ADA maximum slope means a minimu
m of 20 feet of ramp for every 1 foot of elevation. To reach a 22’ bridge deck requires a
lot of ramp, a lot of concrete. At least 440’ up, 440’ down. Never have we so appreciate
d the current bridge, simple though it is. A thin green strip of painted steel girder, toppe
d by a comparatively transparent chain link fence. It sits lightly on the landscape, and i
ntrudes minimally in the neighborhood. The z-layout of stairs and bridge move kids wh
ere they want to go: east, south, and east again, toward the swimming pool, playgroun
d, etc. We like the bridge as it is, and are not opposed to delaying the replacement of t
he newly repaired bridge, especially if it opens up better options in the next few years.
Option 6A, elevator building with stairs, seems like the least objectionable choice. Avoi
ds the need for vast expanses of concrete ramps. Fits best within existing footprint. Sta
irs preserve a short trip over the highway, and provide a heart-healthy rise in heart rate
. As Colleen referenced, 2 SWLRT stations (West Lake, Penn) will have pedestrian bri
dges with elevators. We can’t imagine the troubles Minneapolis has had with their busi
est transit stations used by thousands of people will be repeated here if Edina were to
build elevators to enhance access to a park. Option 1A would be a 2nd choice. The swi
tchback layout would at least reduce the visual impact of vast amounts of concrete, and
leave the bridge where it has always been. Option 5B (long straight ramps to a bridge r
elocated 470’ west) is the most objectionable. 467’ of ramp on the north side. 590’ on t
he south. Include the bridge itself and that’s almost a quarter mile of concrete straight o
ut our front window. Hundreds of feet of concrete to both the east and west. Hide it (par
tially) behind a yet-to-be-approved, might-someday-be-approved, opposed-by-many, 2
0’ high concrete wall and we’d lose our sunshine, especially when the Minnesota winter
sun stays low in the southern sky. The north frontage road, W 64th, is almost a north-si
de extension of the amenity provided by the park. A lot of pedestrians enjoy walking a l
oop that includes W 64th, and the sunshine, breezes, wide open spaces and distant ho
rizons of lakes and green trees provided by the view of Rosland Park to the south. No
one will enjoy walking in the shadow of a wall. Or of a 467’ ramp. A trip across this brid
ge would be ~5x as long as a trip over the current bridge, taking ~5 minutes rather than
under 1. Also, kids are heading for destinations to the east and south (pool, playground
, pavilion, baseball diamond, fishing dock). Heading west is heading in the wrong direct
ion. (submitted for my mother)
Are there nearby alternative north-south routes across Hwy 62 (which might also benef
it neighbors on Brookview and Valley View Rd)? Could a path be added along the north
side Hwy 62 fence to connect Wooddale extension to Rosland Park via Valley View Ro
ad? Currently, pedestrians would take the sidewalk on the east side of Valley View all th
e way to 66th St, before crossing Valley View Rd to Rosland park. Could a shorter path
be created? Will the Valley View underpass at Hwy 62 be improved sometime after MN
Dot’s 494 project is completed in 2026? When the Valley View bridge is replaced, coul
d 1) a sidewalk be added to the west side of Valley View under Hwy 62 (currently, side
walk is on east side only), 2) a cross walk and traffic light be added for exiting traffic me
rging to Valley View (only stopping merging traffic when pedestrians are crossing) and
3) a very small at-grade pedestrian bridge be added to provide a short cut across the d
rainage ditch which separates Valley View from the pool parking lot, so pedestrians on
Valley View Rd don’t have to walk all the way to the corner of Valley View Rd and 66th
St to get to Rosland Park? A grade-level crossing wouldn't require long ramps to a brid
ge at 22'. (submitted for my mother)
11 March 24
BCP
AGREES
0
DISAGREES
0
REPLIES
0
Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 November 2023 to 12 March 2024
GUEST BOOK
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Concepts Feeback
Options 7 and 8 may have had their origin in a suggestion I made to 1) provide a straig
ht east ramp option to preserve some portion of the berm and trees between Rose Ct a
nd Hwy 62, and 2) avoid taking kids out of their way, allowing their 4-5x longer trip acro
ss the highway to take them east and south toward their destinations. Either option 7 or
8 as shown could be simplified by ending the ramp on the higher elevation of the ridge
that rises above (south-side) W 64th as it turns the corner. By ending the ramp on high
er ground, less ramp (much less?) would be required to connect the 22’ bridge to the gr
ound via a 5% slope. Would it be possible to raise the elevation of that ridge even furth
er to allow for a shorter ramp? If the bridge were to land on a pier between the W 64th
and the Hwy 62 exit at Valley View, the ramp down from the bridge could start losing el
evation on a 5% slope as it crossed W64th to the SSW, while maintaining more than th
e required 15’6” clearance. Could either a shorter single switchback or a circular ramp
provide enough elevation change to match the elevation of the ridge? If so, an on-grad
e path could connect the ramp to the parking lot, winding as necessary to keep the slo
pe at the allowed ADA maximum. Option 6A, elevator, would provide similar benefits an
d more: 1) preserve the berm and trees, and 2) avoid taking kids out of their way in the
wrong direction. (submitted by BP on behalf of BP)
STAFF REPORT Page 21
Appendix G: Comments Provided Via Email & Mail
From:C K
To:Chad Millner
Cc:M Kao
Subject:Re: Renderings Available RE: Rosland Ped Bridge - BetterTogetherEdina Update
Date:Monday, March 11, 2024 10:39:54 PM
Attachments:image001.gifimage001.gifimage001.gifScreenshot 20240311 210700 Chrome.jpg
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Chad:
I also wasn’t to submit my feedback on the project page. The green submit button after does
not work even though comments were welcome through today 3/11.
Here are my comments if you can assist in adding to the page:
Design 1A allows the bridge to stay in its current place, lessening the impact to nearbyresidents yet still allowing convenient access from the walking path.
A sound wall would obstruct Millers Ln and adjacent residents from the views of Roslandpark and the 4th of July fireworks display that our cul de sac family enjoy annually right from
our street.
Thank you, CQ
On Mar 11, 2024, at 9:11 PM, M Kao < wrote:
Chad,
I recall that we had through Monday to post our thoughts, but I got an error thatprevented me from doing so. I've attached an image of that error message.
That said, could you copy-and-paste the below comment to be acknowledged by
all?
A large factor to moving to the Concord neighborhood, on Millers Lane, was due
to the existence of the bridge that made the park, courts, and lake accessible. Ofthe options being considered, my first preference would be Option 1A. While 6A
is a close second. All other options would drastically alter the asthetics thatcurrently make the neighborhood approachable and/or significantly reduce the
ease to access the courts and trails.
March 8. Please submit comments before then. Our tentative schedule is to seek
council direction at the March 19 City Council Meeting.
https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/rosland-park-bridge
Thanks,
Chad
Chad Millner, Director of EngineeringHe/Him952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-03927450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov
Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org.
From:Colleen Curran
To:James Hovland; James Hovland; Julie Risser; Kate Agnew; James Pierce; Carolyn Jackson; Chad Millner; Scott H.Neal
Subject:Additional Comments re Rosland Park Bridge
Date:Tuesday, March 5, 2024 8:09:47 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor, Council Members and Staff,
I am providing you with a copy of my recent comments on Better Together Edina regarding the Rosland Park
Bridge. I am doing this because as described in the last paragraph, I am asking for an extension time for comments
until COB Monday, March 11.
After reviewing the additional renderings of the possible designs for the Rosland Park Bridge, I am even more
convinced that the elevator with stairs proposal, 6B, is the right design. As the additional renderings demonstrate,
the footprint of the elevator is much smaller than any of the ramps, saving trees, maintaining privacy for the
neighbors and with ample room for the northbound turning lane on Hwy 62 and the Sound Wall. In addition, the
sleek modern look of the elevator dramatically raises the aesthetic of the Rosland Bridge project. I understood that
the SW LRT project has a couple of elevators and that an attempt was going to be made to connect with that project
manager on their elevators. What was the result of that discussion? Most importantly, the safety of pedestrians,
people with disabilities and bikers will be best served by the elevator given the narrow intersection at 64th Street,
the Wooddale Path, and Rose Court.
Also, please ensure that the construction of the bridge and the improvements to Hwy 62 and the Sound Wall occur
in a close sequence, not years apart. This should result in less construction costs or problems and more peaceful
enjoyment of the neighborhood.
Finally, given the fact that additional information has been added to BTE yesterday, March 4, and to date only one
other person has provided comments on any of the additional information, which renderings were not provided until
March 1, I suggest you extend the comment period to close of business, Monday, March 11. There would still be
ample time to prepare for the Council Meeting on March 19.
Sincerely,
Colleen Curran
6301 Rose Ct
From:
To:James Hovland; Julie Risser; James Pierce; Kate Agnew; Carolyn Jackson
Cc:Chad Millner
Subject:Better Together: Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
Date:Monday, March 11, 2024 9:58:51 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Greetings Mayor Hovland, City Councilmembers and Director Millner -
Several times today I attempted to add comments to the Better Together
site, Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge project page and received error
messages. My comments still are not published. Following is what Iintended to post:
Thank you for taking time to provide the updated graphics--much improved over just lines ona page. It is beyond obvious the best concept solution that meets most of your project goals is#6A/Concept3 (Elevators with stairs). Although none of the concepts are perfect,#6A/Concept 3 is ADA compliant; is the safest option; and is the least problematic for theproperty owners who live within feet of the new bridge.
None of the concepts protect the trees so the new renderings are deceiving in that regard. Thedrawings should have publicly depicted what engineering has stated: that all the trees on thenorth side will be removed. This factor makes the case even stronger for #6A/Concept 3 sinceany privacy currently afforded the north side will be eliminated. The proposed sound wall isyears away and the budget yet to be approved. Both of the ramp options only add more safety concerns with accidents waiting to happen: The switchback version does not take into account the third lane expansion on the north sideof highway 62 and places the ramps dangerously close to the traffic lanes. As pedestriansenter the ramp, they are facing speeding cars. The long ramps are tempting and invitingraceways for skateboard and bike races.
Further, in previous public meetings when photos of comparison pedestrian bridges in themetro area were presented, none of those examples were located as close to single familyhomes or jammed into such a tight space as exists with this proposed bridge on the north sideof highway 62. Option#6A/Concept 3 is the only solution that physically fits the space andmeets the primary reason for this new bridge: by federal law, a new bridge must be ADAcompliant. Yes, there will be maintenance issues, but knowing that now will allow the city toplan ahead.
If the council decides against the elevator option, then I would encourage choice "A" fromabove: Do Nothing.
I trust this email will be included in your council packets as you consider
staff recommendations at your meeting on March 19.
Thank you for carefully making this impactful and long-lasting decision fornearby residents, the neighborhood and community.
Best regards,
Connie Carrino
From:Janelle Page
To:Chad Millner
Subject:Comments on Rosland Park Bridge
Date:Tuesday, March 12, 2024 1:34:00 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Chad,
I submitted comments on the Rosland Park Bridge yesterday on the website, but I don’t seemy comments on the site.I want to make sure you get my comments, so here they are:
“I strongly prefer option 6a (elevator and stairs) or option 0 (do nothing) since they are theleast change to the current bridge footprint, and to the neighborhood. Option 1a - switch backramps east is my second preference.
I really DO NOT want option 5B (bridge moved to the west). That would destroy theneighborhood, which is already being negatively impacted by the road reconstruction project(Concord BC)).
JMP”
Thanks,Janelle
From:Brian Page
To:Chad Millner
Subject:Public Comments on Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
Date:Tuesday, March 12, 2024 12:52:53 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Chad,
We entered several public comments last night (shown below) regarding the Rosland Park
Pedestrian Bridge. Can our comments please be included on the website and taken into
consideration?
Thanks,
Brian Page (on behalf of Betty Page)
C
#1
Vast expanses of concrete would degrade both the neighborhood and the park to which the
bridge is intended to provide access. A 5% ADA maximum slope means a minimum of 20 feet
of ramp for every 1 foot of elevation. To reach a 22’ bridge deck requires a lot of ramp, a lot of
concrete. At least 440’ up, 440’ down.
Never have we so appreciated the current bridge, simple though it is. A thin green strip of
painted steel girder, topped by almost transparent chainlink fence. It sits lightly on the
landscape, and intrudes minimally in the neighborhood. The z-layout of stairs and bridge move
kids where they want to go: east, south, and east again, toward the swimming pool,
playground, etc.
We like the bridge as it is, and are not opposed to delaying the replacement of the newly
repaired bridge, especially if it opens up better options in the next few years.
Option 6A, elevator building with stairs, seems like the least objectionable choice. Avoids the
need for vast expanses of concrete ramps. Fits best within existing footprint. Stairs preserve a
short trip over the highway, and a heart-healthy rise in heart rate. As Colleen referenced, 2
SWLRT stations (West Lake, Penn) will have pedestrian bridges with elevators. We can’t
imagine the troubles Minneapolis has had with their busiest transit stations used by thousands
of people will be repeated here if Edina were to build elevators to improve access to a park.
Option 1A would be a 2nd choice. The switchback layout would at least reduce the visual
impact of vast amounts of concrete.
Option 5B (long straight ramps to a bridge relocated 470’ west) is the most objectionable. 467’
of ramp on the north side. 590’ on the south. Include the bridge itself and that’s almost a
quarter mile of concrete straight out our front window. Hundreds of feet of concrete to both
the east and west. Hide it (partially) behind a yet-to-be-approved, might-someday-be-
approved, opposed-by-many, 20’ high concrete wall and we’d lose our sunshine, especially
when the Minnesota winter sun stays low in the southern sky. The north frontage road, W
64th, is almost a north side extension of the amenity provided by the park. A lot of pedestrians
enjoy walking a loop that includes W 64th, and the sunshine, breezes, wide open spaces and
distant horizons of lakes and green trees provided by the view of Rosland Park to the south.
No one will enjoy walking in the shadow of a wall. Or of a 467’ ramp.
A trip across this bridge would be ~5x as long as a trip over the current bridge, taking ~5
minutes rather than under 1.
Also, kids are heading for destinations to the east and south (pool, playground, pavilion,
baseball diamond, fishing dock). Heading west is heading in the wrong direction.
#2
Are there alternative north south routes across Hwy 62 (which might also benefit neighbors
on Brookview and Valley View Rd)?
Could a path be added along the north side Hwy 62 fence to connect Wooddale extension to
Rosland Park via Valley View Road? Currently, pedestrians would take the sidewalk on the east
side of Valley View all the way to 66th St, before crossing Valley View Rd to Rosland park.
Could a shorter path be created?
Will the Valley View underpass at Hwy 62 be improved sometime after MNDot’s 494 project is
completed in 2026?
When the Valley View bridge is replaced, could 1) a sidewalk be added to the west side of
Valley View under Hwy 62 (current: sidewalk on east side only), 2) a cross walk and traffic light
be added for exiting traffic merging to Valley View (only stopping merging traffic when
pedestrians are crossing) and 3) a very small at-grade pedestrian bridge be added to provide a
short cut across the drainage ditch which separates Valley View from the pool parking lot, so
pedestrians on Valley View Rd don’t have to walk all the way to the corner of Valley View Rd
and 66th St to get to Rosland Park?
#3
Options 7 and 8 may have had their origin in a suggestion I made to 1) provide a straight east
ramp option to preserve some portion of the berm and trees between Rose Ct and Hwy 62,
and 2) avoid taking kids out of their way, allowing their 4-5x longer trip across the highway to
take them east and south toward their destinations. Either option 7 or 8 as shown could be
simplified by ending the ramp on the higher elevation of the ridge that rises above (south-
side) W 64th as it turns the corner. By ending the ramp on higher ground, less ramp (much
less?) would be required to connect the 22’ bridge to the ground via a 5% slope. Would it be
possible to raise the elevation of that ridge even further to allow for a shorter ramp? If the
bridge were to land on a pier between the W 64th and the Hwy 62 exit at Valley View, the
ramp down from the bridge could start losing elevation on a 5% slope as it crossed W 64th to
the SSW, while maintaining more than the required 15’6” clearance. Could either a shorter
single switchback or a circular ramp provide enough elevation change to match the elevation
of the ridge? If so, an on-grade path could connect the ramp to the parking lot, winding as
necessary to keep the slope at the allowed ADA maximum.
Option 6A, elevator, would provide similar benefits and more: 1) preserve the berm and trees,
and 2) avoid taking kids out of their way in the wrong direction.
From:M Kao
To:Chad Millner
Cc:Cindy Quan
Subject:Re: Renderings Available RE: Rosland Ped Bridge - BetterTogetherEdina Update
Date:Monday, March 11, 2024 9:11:34 PM
Attachments:image001.gifScreenshot 20240311 210700 Chrome.jpg
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Chad,
I recall that we had through Monday to post our thoughts, but I got an error that prevented me
from doing so. I've attached an image of that error message.
That said, could you copy-and-paste the below comment to be acknowledged by all?
A large factor to moving to the Concord neighborhood, on Millers Lane, was due to the
existence of the bridge that made the park, courts, and lake accessible. Of the options beingconsidered, my first preference would be Option 1A. While 6A is a close second. All other
options would drastically alter the asthetics that currently make the neighborhoodapproachable and/or significantly reduce the ease to access the courts and trails.
The consideration of a noise wall could have an equally negative effect. If the wall was no
more than 10 feet tall, I would consider it. If it were any higher, and taking into considerationthe trees, the Independence Day fireworks show that we view from Millers Lane could no
longer be visible. The anticipation, charm and spectacular family (and neighborhood) momentcould not be replicated.
All said, the more change that occurs the more unattractive it would be to live here. Which
could be detrimental to the resale evaluation of our homes, which could trigger a lot morepublic anger. Tread carefully.
Thanks,
Mike Kao
6328 Millers Lane
From: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov>
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 2:44 PM
Cc: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov>; Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov>; James Archer
<James.Archer@bolton-menk.com>
Subject: Renderings Available RE: Rosland Ped Bridge - BetterTogetherEdina Update
The project team has created 13 graphical renderings of various options from various angles. All the
renderings are posted in the document section of the website titled “Edina Pedestrian Bridge 03-03-
24.pdf”. Staff is seeking feedback on the matrix, concepts and renderings until March 8. Staff will
From:Rick S
To:Chad Millner
Subject:Rosland Bridge
Date:Tuesday, March 5, 2024 7:34:57 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Chad, I am not sure if my comment on the Better Together page loaded so I wanted to send you my comments.
My mother and I live on Millers Lane and both support option 1A which is the current location with the switch back
ramps to the east. I think the elevator option will be problematic for reasons you have outlined. We do not support
moving the bridge to the west. Thanks to you and your staff for the information provided for comments.
Thanks.
Rick Sheridan
Sent from my iPhone
From:Colleen Curran
To:James Hovland; James Hovland; Julie Risser; Kate Agnew; James Pierce; Carolyn Jackson; Chad Millner; Scott H.Neal
Cc:denny ipad; Tracie Bell; Becky Thacher-Bell; John Nymark; Randy Johnson; Ryan Elbing
Subject:Rosland Park Bridge Project
Date:Monday, March 11, 2024 2:03:53 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor, Council Member and Staff.
jAs the home owners in Rose Court who expect to be most impacted by the Council’s decision on the Rosland ParkBridge project, we have consistently advocated for the elevator option for a wide variety of reasons stated manytimes already. We are not wavering on that point.
We continue to have concerns, though, with the accuracy of the renderings provided on BetterTogetherEdina,particularly because of the inclusion of lots of trees when we all know that if any ramp option is chosen, all thosetrees, including a large old oak, will be destroyed. Once the Council approves whatever option it chooses to take,we would like the ability to discuss the fine details of the new bridge, with the hope of saving some trees. We alsoexpect more attention will be made about the design aesthetics and we would like to be a part of that conversation,too.
Sincerely,Colleen CurranDennis SchulstadTracie and Becky BellJohn NymarkRandy JohnsonRyan and Mamie Elbing
Please leave the Rosland Bridge in its current location. Moving its location further west on 62 will
bring safety issues. Distraction of the bridge or activity on the bridge could lead to "driver's error".
The design with the long ramp is an eye sore. We can do better. The switch back ramp is better.
The now existing pedestrian path makes for a good flow to the enhance of the bridge. Changes
would make it less efficient.
We need to commit to a pleasing and future focused design. Are we ready to decide now or maybe
take a little more time for impact and reflection? We do have a good start.
Respectfully, J.T.
(Transcribed by Engineering Coordinator, Liz Moore)
My vote is to keep the Rosland Bridge in its present location.
With the current recommendations, the switch back ramp option is the safest in the ramp options.
Long ramps invite racing which leads to injuries.
My concern with the elevator option is maintenance and cost and potential vandalism. Is Edina
maintenance crew ready to meet the challenge that elevator option presents?
Respectfully, J.C.T
(Transcribed by Engineering Coordinator, Liz Moore)
EdinaMN.gov
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
Approve Recommendation
City Council Meeting
March 19, 2023
Chad Millner, Engineering Director
City Goals and Values
•Vision Edina
•“Continue to promote and develop the sidewalk, trail and
bike networks to improve accessibility and connectivity
throughout the city and beyond.”
•2018 Comprehensive Plan
•“Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses
(including those with transportation disadvantages) through
the creation and maintenance of a balanced system of
transportation alternatives for transit riders, pedestrians,
bicyclists and motorists.”
•Living Streets Plan
•“Edina is a place were transportation utilizing all modes is
equally safe and accessible.”
Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan
•City’s framework for becoming more walkable and
bikeable
•Result of extensive public engagement process
•-Open houses, workshops, listening sessions,
Commission meetings, public hearings, on-line and in-
person comments and feedback
•Engineering recommendations based around Twin
Loops; a high-comfort, shared-use facility that connects
all 4 quadrants to schools, parks, community
destinations
•Addressing ADA requirements is important
component of building the All Ages and Abilities
network envisioned by this plan
Community Feedback
•2015 and 2017 Quality of Life Survey
•6 out of 10 more likely to walk more and bike more with sidewalks, paths and trails.
•2023 Quality of Life Survey
•Comments related to lack of sidewalks and safe bike paths, unsafe for kids to walk to
school, and a lack of walkability & bike ability.
•2015 –2023 Quality of Life Survey: improving on ease of walking and biking
•Active building more, wider and in a variety of locations.
•Building out the system / Reducing Barriers –the system has less gaps that increases the
ease of use.
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•April 12, 2023, Resident Meeting
•Nov. 8, 2023, Resident Meeting
•Nov. 21, 2023, City Council Meeting –Council directed for more community feedback
•Nov. 22, 2023, Created BTE Website
•Dec. 14, 2023, Community Meeting -3 Councilmembers in attendance
•Dec. 19, 2023, City Council Meeting
•Jan. 11, 2024, Resident Meeting
•Feb. 22, 2024, BTE Updated Concepts and Matrix
•March 1, 2024, BTE Graphical Renderings
•March 5, 2024, BTE additional Graphical Renderings
•March 19, 2024 City Council Meeting -Decision
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Steel Trust Bridge –Spans Entire Highway and Frontage Road
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Steel Trust Bridge –Spans Entire Highway and Frontage Road
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 1A with Switchbacks –Staff
Recommendation
Noise Wall Location #A
Noise Wall Location #B
•Residents –screen bridge –noise
wall between bridge and 64th Street
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 1A with Switchbacks –Staff Recommendation
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 1A with Switchbacks –Staff Recommendation
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 1A with Switchbacks –Staff Recommendation
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 1A with Switchbacks –Staff Recommendation
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 5B with Long Ramps
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 5B with Long Ramps
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 5B with Long Ramps
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 5B with Long Ramps
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 6A with Elevators and Stairs, with and without south Ramp
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 6A with Elevators
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 6A with Elevators
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 6A with Elevators
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 7: Bridge moved 470-ft East with Helical Ramp South near Aquatic Center
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Option 8: Bridge moved 470-ft East with Switchback Ramp South near Aquatic Center
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Construction differences ADA Ramps vs Elevators
•Building, Water Management, HVAC, Electricity
Funding Available $5 -$6M (MnDOT’s in 2025)
Project Cost for Bridge with ramps or with elevators
$5M -$6M
Initial construction cost is similar
Elevator long term maintenance is much more
expensive –8x
Snow removal –much more expensive
Allow dogs?
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•Maintenance and Operations –ADA Ramps vs Elevators
•Bridge –Painting, Patch and Seal the Deck -$2,500 per year or $250,000 (100-yrs)
•Elevator(s) –Annual Inspection, HVAC, Electricity, Maintenance, Cables and Replacement (not
considering safety, security and graffiti)
$20,000 per year or $2,000,000 (100-years)
Elevators are estimated at 8 times more costly to maintain and will have many more closures
due to maintenance = No ADA access during maintenance (Does not Meet Goals of Pedestrian
and Bicycle Master Plan)
Transit Agencies –elevators are used as restrooms, sleeping, drug use, etc., confined space
Misc. Transit Stations –Elevators out so frequently, looking to add ramps
Snow removal?? Dogs??
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
•BetterTogetherEdina (2 times) and Email Comments
Elevators: Comments both for and against the option.
Option #1A: Comments both for and against the option.
Do not support long straight ramp as shown in Option #5B, #7 and #8.
Need aesthetic treatments with any of the ramp options (Yes staff will engage the
community on this).
Noise Wall: Comments both for and against a noise wall (This is a separate
MnDOT Project).
Leave the bridge in its existing location.
Concerns for trees, space, bike speeds, and safety with all the options (Yes –trying
balance all the impacts).
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
Staff recommends Option 1A with Switchbacks
•Meets ADA Requirements all the time (no mechanical failures –elevators)
•More Visibility for Users –Safety and Security. No confined spaces.
•No Impact to Local Street Operations, Highway 62 Operations, Residential Properties,
Auxiliary Lane & Noise Wall, and Right-of-Way
•Less trees removed north and south of Highway 62 compared to other options
•Not Connecting to a Parking Ramp or Skyway or Transit Facility (context)
•Aesthetics TBD –most likely a similar process to Grandview Pedestrian Bridge
•Bring back a Public Engagement Plan to Council for future consideration
•Any initial feedback on Aesthetics would be welcomed now
•MnDOT has to review aesthetics because of a MnDOT Highway
Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge
Staff Recommendation
•Motion to Approve Option #1A with Switchbacks
•Questions / Feedback?
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: IX.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Gillian Straub, City Management Fellow
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission,
January 23, 2024
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Receive minutes from the January 23, 2024 meeting of the HRRC.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
HRRC Minutes: January 23, 2024
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Human Rights & Relations Commission
Edina City Hall, Community Room
January 23, 2024, 7:00 p.m.
I. Call to Order
Chair Stringer Moore called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering Roll Call: Commissioners Dawkins, Rogers, Felton, Bennett, Segall, Khalifa, Nelson, Stringer
Moore.
Staff Present: Scott Neal, City Manager.
Absent: Commissioner Ismail, and Student Commissioners Borah and Mohamud-Karie.
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
Vice Chair Bennett requested to add consideration of the time of the February meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Bennett to approve the amended January 23, 2024, meeting
agenda with new item 7 – Discussion of a new time for the February meeting, seconded by
Commissioner Nelson. Motion carried.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Motion by Commissioner Khalifa to approve the minutes from the December 5, 2023,
meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Segall. Motion carried.
V. Reports/Recommendations
A. Commission Correspondence Discussion
• Chair Stringer Moore summarized the correspondence received since the December
meeting.
• Regarding correspondence on posting Hennepin County’s land acknowledgement,
commissioners discussed options including proposing this as a work plan item, creating a
task force, including community voices and hiring consultants.
Motion by Commissioner Felton to table discussion on commission action on a land
acknowledgement until the March meeting, seconded by Commissioner Bennett. Motion
carried.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
• Regarding correspondence on Edina Public Schools, commissioners discussed role of the
HRRC and the school board.
B. 2023 Human Rights & Relations Commission Work Plan Update
• Commissioners discussed the following updates:
o Initiative 5: Climate Action Plan HS 4-3
• Commissioner Segall introduced the report, and commissioners discussed
some formatting changes.
Motion by Commissioner Nelson to approve the report as submitted to send to the Energy
and Environment Commission. Seconded by Commissioner Bennett. Motion carried.
o Initiative 7: Bias and Discrimination Event Response Plan Review
• Neal shared the item would be on the City Council’s February 6th meeting
agenda for approval. Commissioners requested it be a reports and
recommendations item to raise community awareness of the plan.
C. 2024 Human Rights & Relations Commission Work Plan Introduction
• Commissioners discussed the following updates:
o Initiative 6: Days of Remembrance Event
o Commissioner Nelson introduced the work of the subcommittee. The
group has selected a speaker, a theme, and a date.
o Commissioners discussed the possibility of selecting a new date.
o Commissioners discussed the possibility of not allowing broadcast,
recording, or streaming at the speaker’s request; commissioners agreed
this was acceptable.
o Initiative 7: Review and propose revision of Days of Remembrance resolution.
o Commissioners Bennett and Nelson provided an update and proposed
language revising outdated language and adding clauses regarding
continuing acts of genocide.
o Commissioners agreed to discuss this at the February meeting.
D. Change in February meeting time
• Commissioner Bennett noted that the precinct caucuses will be held on the same night as
the HRRC meeting at the same time and requested moving the meeting time up to 5:00,
with an end time no later than 6:45 pm to allow people to attend caucuses.
• Commissioners discussed this possibility decided to make no change to the meeting time.
VI. Chair and Member Comments
• Received.
VII. Staff Comments
• Received.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
VIII. Adjournment
Motion by Commissioner Segall to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner
Nelson. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 8:57 p.m.
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: IX.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Community Health Commission: January 8
and February 12, 2024
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
No action requested, review of minutes from commission.
INTRODUCTION:
January and February 2024 Community Health Commission Meeting Minutes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Minutes: CHC: January 8,2024
Minutes: CHC: February 12, 2024
MINUTES
Community Health Commission
January 8, 2024 at 6:30 PM
City Hall, Community Room
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
Present: Tracy Nelson, Andrew Hawkins, Mary Absolon, Nick Mattison, Matt
Giljahn, Andrea Leszko, Andrea Sullivan (Patineau), Brenna Smithson, Anoushka
Jha
III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion by Nick Mattison to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by Matt
Giljahn. Motion Carried.
IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes
A.Minutes: Community Health Commission: December 11 2023
Motion by Tracy Nelson to approve December 11, 2023 CHC Meeting
Minutes. Seconded by Brenna Smithson. Motion Carried.
V.Community Comment
VI.Reports/Recommendations
A.Mental Health Pop-ups Discussion
Discussion with Marnita's Table staff regarding contract with cities of
Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield centered around conducting pop-up mental
health events in the three cities. The Community Health Commission
enthusiastically supports the grant and contract with Marnita's Table as it aligns
well with current CHC workplan item regarding social connectedness and mental
health.
The Community Health Commission will work closely and support Marnita's
Table in this effort to implement a community building approach for Edina related
to mental health and social connectedness in a scalable fashion.
Members Brenna Smithson, Matt Giljahn, and Andrew Hawkins are the leads on
this work plan initiative and will be the points of contact with Marnita's Table.
B.SCHSAC Representative
Motion by Andrea Patineau to appoint Tracy Nelson as State Community
Health Services Advisory Committee representative for the City of Edina
Community Health Board. Seconded by Brenna Smithson. Motion Carried.
VII.Chair And Member Comments
VIII.Staff Comments
IX.Adjournment
MINUTES
Community Health Commission
February 12, 2024 at 6:30 PM
City Hall, Community Room
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
Present: Andrew Hawkins, Andrea Sullivan (Patineau), Andrea Leszko, Nick
Mattison, Tracy Nelson, Matt Giljahn, Anoushka Jha.
III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion by Andrea Leszko to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by
Andrew Hawkins. Motion Carried.
IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes
A.Minutes: Community Health Commission: January 8, 2024
Motion by Tracy Nelson to approve January 8, 2024 meeting minutes.
Seconded by Andrea Patineau. Motion Carried.
V.Community Comment
VI.Reports/Recommendations
A.Chair and Vice-Chair Elections
Motion by Tracy Nelson to to appoint Mary Absolon as Chair and Nick
Mattison as Vice-Chair for the next Commission year.. Seconded by Matt
Giljahn. Motion Carried.
B.Work Plan Update
Social Connectedness/Mental Health Pop-up will be held Saturday, April 13th at
the Edina Senior Center from 10am to 1pm. Additional information and meeting
materials will be coming out as event gets closer. Commission members
encouraged to attend and send out to their networks to encourage attendance.
VII.Chair And Member Comments
VIII.Staff Comments
IX.Adjournment
Date: March 19, 2024 Agenda Item #: IX.C.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Perry Vetter, Director Parks & Recreation
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission Feb. 13,
2024
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Receive the minutes from the Feb. 13, 2024 Parks & Recreation Commission meeting.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached minutes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission Feb. 13, 2024
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 03/12/2024
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Edina Parks & Recreation Commission
Braemar Golf Course
February 13, 2024
7 p.m.
I. Call to Order
Chair Doscotch called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were Commissioners Doscotch, Spanhake, Weaver, Pfuhl and Luangrath
Commissioner Absent: Ites and Student Commissioners DiLorenzo and Holtey
Commissioner Welsh arrived at 7:15 p.m.
Staff Present: Staff Liaison Perry Vetter, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Tom Swenson,
Assistant Director Recreation and Facilities Tracy Petersen, Park Planner Rachel Finberg, and
Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
Motion made by Spanhake to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Weaver.
Motion carried.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Motion made by Pfuhl to approve the Jan. 9, 2024, minutes. Motion seconded by Spanhake.
Motion carried.
V. Community Comment
None
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. 2024 Work Plan initiative 1.6.5: Review and compare park shelter building amenities
and function
Staff Liaison Vetter requested feedback regarding the role that staff can play in helping this
initiative along. In the upcoming Capital Improvements Program (CIP) there are five shelter
buildings over the course of several years and spaced out about a year apart. The first one is
slated for Lewis Park in 2025. It was recommended to study an option if each project should be
“scaled” to fit the particular park that will house it or operate individual designs per park
improvement. This work will be coordinated to begin and be a baseline for commissioners as
part of this initiative.
Commissioner Welsh arrived at 7:15 p.m.
B. 2024 Commission Work Plan
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 03/12/2024
Initiative 1.6.1 – Review and comment on Fred Richards Implementation. Commissioner
Pfuhl is taking the lead along with Commissioner Weaver.
Initiative 1.6.2 –Review and comment on Braemar Park Implementation. Work continues
and buckthorn has been removed.
Initiative 1.6.3 – Review and comment on Braemar Arena Implementation.
Two initial Professional Service Agreements will go to City Council next Tuesday, Feb. 20.
Initiative 1.6.4 – Community Garden Study and Report. Chair Doscotch is assisting with this
initiative.
Initiative 1.6.5 – Review and compare park shelter building amenities and function. This
item was previously discussed.
C. Annual Election of Officers
Chair Doscotch opened the floor for nominations for Chair of the Parks & Recreation
Commission.
Spanhake moved to nominate Commissioner Doscotch as Chair of the Parks & Recreation
Commission. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair Doscotch opened the floor for nominations for Vice-Chair of the Parks & Recreation
Commission.
Spanhake moved to nominate Commissioner Pfuhl as Vice-Chair of the Parks &
Recreation. Roll call vote, Motion carried unanimously.
VII. Chair and Member Comments
A. Recap of presentation to Point of France Members
Chair Doscotch gave a recap of the event and presentation given to Point of France members
on Jan. 30.
VIII. Staff Comments
A. Update on the 2024 Residential Tree Sale
Assistant Director Swenson stated that tree canopy loss has occurred throughout Edina. Over
the past few years, over 1,000 trees have been replaced. This year, the price to Edina residents is
$50 per tree, and the City subsidizes by paying the remaining $80. The trees are 6-feet tall, and
the sale will go live on Feb. 23, 2024, at noon, online through Tree Trust.
B. Upcoming Meetings and Events
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 03/12/2024
Staff Liaison Vetter stated that in March, new members will be joining the Commission. The April
and May meetings will be held on Mondays. There is also a second meeting on May 21, which is a
joint Work Session with the City Council.
There was some discussion regarding the ice rinks and how the record-breaking warmth
impacted them. There was also discussion regarding numerous employees who were hired to
staff the ice rinks. A more detailed report will be forthcoming at the next meeting.
IX. Adjournment
Motion made by Pfuhl to adjourn the Feb. 13, 2024, meeting at 7:52 p.m. Motion seconded by
Weaver. Meeting adjourned.