Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-01-21 City Council Meeting Packet
Meeting location: Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN City Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, January 21, 2025 7:00 PM Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535- 8110. Enter access code 2633 985 4275. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn to speak. Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927- 8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval of Meeting Agenda 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. 5.1. City Manager's Response to Community Comments 6. Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable roll call vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) 6.1. Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Jan. 7, 2025 6.2. Payment of Claims Page 1 of 365 6.3. Request for Purchase: 2025 Efficient Building Benchmarking Services 6.4. Resolution No. 2025-12: Approving Parking Restrictions 6.5. Traffic Safety Report of October 29, 2024 6.6. Request for Purchase: 2025 Computer Replacements 6.7. Request for Purchase: Security Camera Service and Support Agreement 6.8. Second Amendment to Site Lease Agreement 6.9. Approve Amendment to Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services Agreement between Bloomington and Edina 6.10. Approve Amendment to Local Public Health Services Agreement Between Edina and Bloomington 6.11. League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues 6.12. Ordinance No. 2025-02: Setting Morningside Water Rates 7. Special Recognitions and Presentations 7.1. Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 27-31, 2025 7.2. Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Update 8. Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 8.1. PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-11 approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and Resolution No. 2025-10 Vacating Public Utility Easement 9. Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) 9.1. Resolution No. 2025-13: Accepting Donations 9.2. Transportation Commission Report on Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research and Page 2 of 365 Recommendations 9.3. Sketch Plan Review for 5100 Eden Avenue 9.4. Ordinance No. 2025-01: Amending Chapter 8 Concerning the Sale of Inhumanely Bred Animals 10. Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) 10.1. Minutes: Transportation Commission, November 21, 2024 10.2. Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission, December 12, 2024 11. Manager's Comments 12. Mayor and Council Comments 13. Adjournment Page 3 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 5.1 Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Type: Other Department: Administration Item Title: City Manager's Response to Community Comments Action Requested: None, information only. Information/Background: Responses to questions posed during Community Comment at the last meeting were posted on the City’s website at https://www.edinamn.gov/2051/Responses-to-Community-Comment. City Manager Neal will provide summaries of those responses during the meeting. Supporting Documentation: None Page 4 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.1 Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Type: Minutes Department: Administration Item Title: Minutes: Work Session and Regular, Jan. 7, 2025 Action Requested: Approve minutes as presented. Information/Background: Supporting Documentation: 1. Minutes: Work Session, Jan. 7, 2025 2. Minutes: Regular, Jan. 7, 2025 Page 5 of 365 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL TUESDAY, JANUARY 7, 2025 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Ari Lenz, Assistant City Manager; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; David Yanagisawa, I.T. Specialist; Sharon Allison, City Clerk. Others in attendance: Katy Senn, Messerli Kramer; Senator Alice Mann; Senator Ron Latz; Representative Cheryl Youakim; Ann Finn, League of Minnesota Cities; Representative Julie Greene (remote); Daniel Lightfoot, League of Minnesota Cities; Patricia Nauman, Metro Cities; and Tom Poul, Municipal Legislative Commission. 2025 STATE LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION MEETING Manager Neal briefly reviewed the City’s legislative priorities including bonding for interchange improvements at Highway 100 and Vernon Avenue/West 50th Street; Bonding for the Aquatic Center; Sales Tax Exemption for projects in the Braemar Park Master Plan and Fred Richards Park Master Plan; Tax Increment Financing Legislation for 70th and France and 72nd and France #2; and to protect municipal employees with enforcement functions. The Council asked questions of staff and discussed with the delegation present the work and conversations that had taken place related to the local land use regulations/housing issue since last year; finding room to acknowledge the value of existing housing and keeping things out of the landfill; accessory dwelling units rights; ways to incentivize naturally occurring affordable housing; the incorrect idea of density equaling affordability; ways to ensure that TIF financed affordable housing was compliant; the fact that the housing issue was working towards solving something that not everyone agrees is actually a problem and possible ways to ‘up the ante’ on getting more people to see the problem; providing more data that supports the notion that there needs to be greater production capacity; awareness about who affordable housing is actually for; work force and market rate housing; whether the cost of building new housing was still part of the discussion at the legislative level; home ownership versus rental; comparisons with what Hopkins has done; possible changes in governance that may take place with the special election; things that the City may need to be mindful of in order to help the legislators outside of their legislative priorities; the requirement of bipartisan cooperation in order to approve a bonding bill; the State budget forecast; the possibility of requiring cities of a certain size to have an affordable housing policy; the value of local control and discretion; beliefs about the zoning preemptions; coalition of developers; local option sales tax methodology and pending legislation; conversations that have begun at the legislative level related to transportation; demographics of the State related to population growth; the impact migration has on schools and ways to find a way to plan long-term; and the accessibility of the delegation for Edina. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, ___, 2025. Page 6 of 365 Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/January 7, 2025 Page 2 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 7 of 365 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 7, 2025 7:00 P.M. I.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2.0 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Hovland. 2.1 ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE City Clerk Allison administered the Oath of Office for City Council to re-elected Mayor James Hovland, Council Members Carolyn Jackson and James Pierce. The Oath of Office for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority was also administered to Mayor Hovland and Commissioners Jackson and Pierce. 3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.0 MEETING AGENDA – APPROVED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. 5.0 COMMUNITY COMMENT Ralph Zickert, 4311 Cornelia Circle, stated his opinion regarding the comments that were made at the December 17, 2024, City Council meeting regarding community comments and them not being broadcast. 5.1. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS City Manager Neal responded to Community Comments from current and past meetings. 6.0 CONSENT AGENDA – ADOPTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item 6.12, Redevelopment Agreement for 7200 France Avenue Apartments and First Amendment to the 7200-7250 Redevelopment Agreement, as follows: 6.1. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of December 9, 16, and 17, 2024 6.2. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Pre-List Dated December 13, 2024, totaling $3,015,274.37, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated December 20, 2024, totaling $2,130,068.29, and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated December 26, 2024, totaling $414,202.55 6.3. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-01, Designating Official Newspaper for 2025 6.4. Adopt Resolution No, 2025-02, Signatory Resolution 6.5. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-03, Designating Official Depositories 6.6. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-04, Designation of Director and Alternate Director of LOGIS 6.7. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-05, Designating Director and Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority 6.8. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-06, Authorizing Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials 6.9. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-08, Approving Mayor’s Appointment of the Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Edina 6.10. Annual Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector 6.11. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-07, Accepting Minnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation Grant 6.12. Redevelopment Agreement for 7200 France Avenue Apartments and First Amendment to the 7200-7250 Redevelopment Agreement Page 8 of 365 Minutes/Edina City Council/January 7, 2025 Page 2 6.13. Request for Purchase, Professional Services for Storm Water and Sanitary Sewer Modeling, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Barr Engineering at $340,000 6.14. Request for Purchase, Professional Services for Final Design & Bidding Documents for Wooddale Avenue Bridge, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, SEH at $278,574 6.15. Request for Purchase, Change Order #1 for Professional Services for Sustainability Policy, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, LHB at $14,786 6.16. Approve 2025-2026 Union Contract for LELS Local 529 Dispatchers 6.17. Request for Purchase, Change Order for Rehabilitation of Well 15, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons at $91,874.00 6.18. Approve Out-of-State Travel for Mayor Hovland 6.19. Approve Summary Publications for Ordinance Nos. 2024-12 and 2024-13 6.20. Approve Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for the Church of St. Patrick 6.21. Adopt 2025 Legislative Platforms Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 6.12. REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR 7200 FRANCE AVENUE APARTMENTS AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 7200-7250 REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT – APPROVED Council Member Risser raised concerns regarding SPARC money that is said to be used for building affordable housing, but the commitment was made in the PUD and TIF agreement. Risser also expressed concerns about the $4.8 million dollars of SPARC (Special Projects and Redevelopment Capital Fund) funds being added on top of that and changes made to the agreement that has been released to the public. Jay Lindgren, Dorsey and Whitney, explained that the error in the paragraph above the chart does not change the substance of what is required of the document. He stated that it is a properly prepared document that has a non-substantial error. Risser discussed concerns about dedicating SPARC funds to a project that has already seen so much public benefit. Affordable Housing Development Manager Hawkinson stated that SPARC funds are used because the TIF notes that were pledged were for the development of 7250 France Avenue, not 7200 France Avenue. She explained that there was a $4.8 million development gap when the 7200 France Avenue proposed apartments with affordable housing came forward and discussed the three proposed hypotheticals for the redevelopments of 7200 & 7250 France Avenue and the public benefits of the redevelopments. Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the Redevelopment Agreement for 7200 France Avenue Apartments and First Amendment to the 7200-7250 Redevelopment Agreement. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Hovland Nay: Risser Motion carried. 7.0 SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 7.1. HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER HEATHER EDELSON UPDATE – PRESENTED Hennepin County Commissioner Heather Edelson presented an update on Hennepin County District 6, including information regarding the budget, 2025 adopted expenditures, human services, public safety, Sheriff’s Department, County Attorney, housing, housing challenges, health highlights, education, resident services highlights, public works and transportation, and Southdale Library building project. Page 9 of 365 Minutes/Edina City Council/January 7, 2025 Page 3 The Council expressed their thanks and appreciation for the Hennepin County services and all the work County Commissioner Edelson has been doing. 7.2. RECOGNIZE THE MOUNTAIN BIKING/CYCLING CLUB AT EDINA HIGH SCHOOL – RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland introduced and recognized the Edina High School State Championship Mountain Biking/Cycling Club. Michael Hartmann, Head Coach, highlighted the team and thanked the students for their hard work. Bob Vose, Coach, thanked the Council for the Braemar Trail System and stated that it has been a game-changer for the team. 8.0 REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-09, ACCEPTING DONATIONS – ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2025-09 accepting various grants and donations. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. 8.2. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-120, VARIANCE APPEAL FOR 5605 MCGUIRE ROAD – ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague discussed the background information and unique circumstances of this project. The Council discussed their support for the approval of this variance appeal. The Council also acknowledged the work being done by the Planning Commission. Member Agnew introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2024-120, approving Impervious Surface Variance for 5606 McGuire Road. Member Risser seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. 8.3. APPOINTMENT OF ACTING MAYOR – APPROVED Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to approve the appointment of Council Member Pierce as Acting Mayor for 2025. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. 9.0 COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) – Received 9.1. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 14, 2024 9.2. MINUTES: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 20, 2024 9.3. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, OCTOBER 24 AND NOVEMBER 21, 2024 10.0 MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received 10.1 CITY MANAGER GOALS FOR 2025 11.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received 11.1 COUNCIL MEMBER GOALS FOR 2025 12.0 ADJOURNMENT Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:03 p.m. Page 10 of 365 Minutes/Edina City Council/January 7, 2025 Page 4 Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 21, 2025. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 7, 2025, meeting available. Page 11 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.2 Prepared By: Pa Thao, Finance Director Item Type: Claims Department: Finance Item Title: Payment of Claims Action Requested: Approve claims for Payment Information/Background: Claims information for approval is attached Supporting Documentation: 1. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 01.03.25 TOTAL $1,413,434.56 2. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 01.10.25 TOTAL $1,319,783.58 3. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 12.20.2024 TOTAL $2,786,708.02 Page 12 of 365 Page 13 of 365 Page 14 of 365 Page 15 of 365 Page 16 of 365 Page 17 of 365 Page 18 of 365 Page 19 of 365 Page 20 of 365 Page 21 of 365 Page 22 of 365 Page 23 of 365 Page 24 of 365 Page 25 of 365 Page 26 of 365 Page 27 of 365 Page 28 of 365 Page 29 of 365 Page 30 of 365 Page 31 of 365 Page 32 of 365 Page 33 of 365 Page 34 of 365 Page 35 of 365 Page 36 of 365 Page 37 of 365 Page 38 of 365 Page 39 of 365 Page 40 of 365 Page 41 of 365 Page 42 of 365 Page 43 of 365 Page 44 of 365 Page 45 of 365 Page 46 of 365 Page 47 of 365 Page 48 of 365 Page 49 of 365 Page 50 of 365 Page 51 of 365 Page 52 of 365 Page 53 of 365 Page 54 of 365 Page 55 of 365 Page 56 of 365 Page 57 of 365 Page 58 of 365 Page 59 of 365 Page 60 of 365 Page 61 of 365 Page 62 of 365 Page 63 of 365 Page 64 of 365 Page 65 of 365 Page 66 of 365 Page 67 of 365 Page 68 of 365 Page 69 of 365 Page 70 of 365 Page 71 of 365 Page 72 of 365 Page 73 of 365 Page 74 of 365 Page 75 of 365 Page 76 of 365 Page 77 of 365 Page 78 of 365 Page 79 of 365 Page 80 of 365 Page 81 of 365 Page 82 of 365 Page 83 of 365 Page 84 of 365 Page 85 of 365 Page 86 of 365 Page 87 of 365 Page 88 of 365 Page 89 of 365 Page 90 of 365 Page 91 of 365 Page 92 of 365 Page 93 of 365 Page 94 of 365 Page 95 of 365 Page 96 of 365 Page 97 of 365 Page 98 of 365 Page 99 of 365 Page 100 of 365 Page 101 of 365 Page 102 of 365 Page 103 of 365 Page 104 of 365 Page 105 of 365 Page 106 of 365 Page 107 of 365 Page 108 of 365 Page 109 of 365 Page 110 of 365 Page 111 of 365 Page 112 of 365 Page 113 of 365 Page 114 of 365 Page 115 of 365 Page 116 of 365 Page 117 of 365 Page 118 of 365 Page 119 of 365 Page 120 of 365 Page 121 of 365 Page 122 of 365 Page 123 of 365 Page 124 of 365 Page 125 of 365 Page 126 of 365 Page 127 of 365 Page 128 of 365 Page 129 of 365 Page 130 of 365 Page 131 of 365 Page 132 of 365 Page 133 of 365 Page 134 of 365 Page 135 of 365 Page 136 of 365 Page 137 of 365 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 01/15/2025 09:23User: PBehrProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1011 Control BS - CashOp CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET INVOICE DTL DESC 274 12/20/2024 WIRE 161329 BARRINGTON BANK & TRUST CO. N.A 670002981-1 12/13/2024 2,786,708.02 Invoice: 670002981-1 Loan# 670002981-1 Borrower's Name: Edina West Cond 2,786,708.02 26026002 1245 HRA HIA - Loans Receivable CHECK 274 TOTAL: 2,786,708.02 NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 2,786,708.02 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS 1 2,786,708.02 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 2,786,708.02 Page 138 of 365 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 01/15/2025 09:23User: PBehrProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED CLERK: PBehr YEAR PER JNL SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC 2024 12 2893APP 26026002-2010 HRA HIA - Accts Pay 2,786,708.02 12/31/2024 CASH DISB pjb AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 9999-1011 Control BS - CashOp 2,786,708.02 12/31/2024 CASH DISB pjb AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL GENERAL LEDGER TOTAL 2,786,708.02 2,786,708.02 APP 9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 2,786,708.02 12/31/2024 CASH DISB pjb APP 26026002-1010 HRA HIA - Cash 2,786,708.02 12/31/2024 CASH DISB pjb SYSTEM GENERATED ENTRIES TOTAL 2,786,708.02 2,786,708.02 JOURNAL 2024/12/2893 TOTAL 5,573,416.04 5,573,416.04 Page 139 of 365 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 01/15/2025 09:23User: PBehrProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 2600 26002 HRA /Housing Im 2024 12 2893 12/31/2024 26026002-1010 HRA HIA - Cash 2,786,708.02 26026002-2010 HRA HIA - Accts Pay 2,786,708.02 FUND TOTAL 2,786,708.02 2,786,708.02 9999 Pooled Cash Fund 2024 12 2893 12/31/2024 9999-1011 Control BS - CashOp 2,786,708.02 9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 2,786,708.02 FUND TOTAL 2,786,708.02 2,786,708.02 Page 140 of 365 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 01/15/2025 09:23User: PBehrProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 2600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 2,786,708.029999 Pooled Cash Fund 2,786,708.02 TOTAL 2,786,708.02 2,786,708.02 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Pamela Behr ** Page 141 of 365 d PURCHASE REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.3 Prepared By: Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager Item Type: Request for Purchase Department: Engineering Item Title: Request for Purchase: 2025 Efficient Building Benchmarking Services Action Requested: Approve Request for Purchase for Efficient Building Benchmarking Services with Touchstone IQ for $20,500. Information/Background: City of Edina has worked with Touchstone IQ since 2020 to support implementation of the City's Efficient Buildings Ordinance. This request for purchase is a smaller scope than previous years based on the approved ordinance changes from the Dec. 17, 2024 City Council Meeting. This agreement allows the City to provide the same level of support for Class 3 buildings, such as help desk services, compliance tracking, and data sharing. Requisition Number: 12500006 Funding Source: Conservation & Sustainability (CAS) Fund Vendor: Touchstone IQ Equipment Status: n/a Cost: $20,500 Resources/Financial Impacts: This cost is budgeted in the Conservation & Sustainability (CAS) Fund 2025 budget. The Sustainability Division oversees implementation and Touchstone IQ has provided implementation services to the City since 2020. The Sustainability Division manages operation of the policy. Relationship to City Policies: The Efficient Buildings Ordinance supports Edina's Climate Action Plan and helps us meet our energy efficiency and water efficiency goals. Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Page 142 of 365 Sustainability Benchmarking helps property owners measure and track their building's energy and water use, indicating where opportunities for improvement are needed. Supporting Documentation: 1. Touchstone IQ Scope of Work Agreement Page 143 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com Edina’s Building Energy Benchmarking Scope of Work - 2025 Project Overview The Touchstone IQ team will complete the following building benchmarking ordinance scope of work items based on Edina’s requested services. The scope items and pricing are based on the fact that there are 83 Class 3 covered buildings that need to meet the ordinance requirements. Scope 1 – Training and Outreach Overview Touchstone IQ will perform the following activities for Edina’s building owners: • Facilitate easy and accurate compliance by building owners/managers. • Provide custom assistance for complex building situations • Provide training, training materials and tools • Provide any applicable content updates for the program ordinance website • Assist Edina in providing outreach to building owners and act as a liaison with utilities and building owners for data requests. The following details our approach in facilitating easy and accurate compliance by building owners/managers. Training Touchstone IQ will deliver one web-based trainings prior to the submission deadline. The training will be both a presentation and interactive help session to achieve the most effective results. Coordination of the sessions will be a combination of Touchstone IQ and City staff. We will look to coordinate, when possible, with representatives from Energy Star, Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. Training material will be posted on the ordinance program website and regularly updated when necessary. Compliance Outreach Help Center Staff will perform Outreach activities to help educate building owners on compliance requirements. This will include email blasts and direct phone calls. We will support direct mailings through the development of content and building address lists. It is expected that the City will cover all costs associated with printing and direct mailer postage. Direct outreach activities will include the following tasks. Page 144 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com • Send two formal compliance reminder notices each year o Email and mail (Mailer production and distribution costs to be covered by the City) • Send two formal violation reminder notices each year for non-compliant building owners o Email and mail (Mailer production and distribution costs to be covered by the City) • After the compliance deadline, staff will call non-compliant building owners, if contact information is available. o If deemed necessary, a 2nd round of non-compliance calls will be made to building owners who have yet to submit 2 months after the submittal deadline. Scope 2 – Help Center Administration Overview Touchstone IQ will perform the following activities for Edina: • Operate a telephone and email helpline • Analyze data to ensure accurate compliance. • Assist in the review and assessment of submissions from building owners/managers to review the accuracy of compliance in both energy use data and building characteristics data. • Generate emails to non-complying building owners on city-specific letterhead to ascertain the reason(s) for noncompliance and possible solutions to the issue(s). The following details our approach for analyzing Energy Star reporting data to ensure accurate compliance. Help Center Administration The Help Center will be staffed with trained energy and sustainability professionals from 9:00 am – 5:00 pm Central Standard Time, Monday through Friday. A single 1-800 help center number will be used for all Minnesota cities participating in the Efficiency Buildings Collaborative building benchmarking programs. The Help Center will be regularly staffed by one to two representatives. Additional representatives may be added during peak periods, if needed. Based on the number of participating buildings we don’t perceive this as being necessary very often. Callers will have the option to leave voicemails. All phone calls and emails received through the Help Center will be answered directly or responded to within 24-48 hours. Communications received at the end of the day on Friday or over the weekend will be responded to on Monday, at the latest. Page 145 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com Our Help Center staff will utilize screen-sharing technology to easily identify submission issues and correct building owner problems in real-time. Our staff will also coordinate with the local Utilities to facilitate auto utility data uploads, where possible. All building owner communication will be tracked through Touchstone IQ for both emails and phone calls. Help Center staff will have access to all past communication notes and emails to better assist building owners. Submission Management Help center staff will receive, track and manage all building owner compliance submissions. Submission approval, denial, and requests for additional information will be tracked by help center staff within Touchstone IQ. Upon receiving building owner submittals, help center staff will respond within five business days with the appropriate approval notification or non- compliance email. Emails will be sent directly from Touchstone IQ and will utilize the City’s letter head / signature line. Help center staff will also call building owners who have non-compliant submissions directly and personally walk them through the reason for non-compliance and the appropriate steps required for approval. Help center staff will also respond within one week to all building owner exemption requests. Touchstone IQ includes automated data quality control checks for more than 50 different points for items such as: • Unusually high or low Energy Star Score • EUI unusually high or low, by building type • Missing utility bill data • Unusual number of building occupants • Unusual number of operating hours • Missing program building ID Touchstone IQ will create new/appropriate check points as Energy Star adds new building types (e.g. hospitals, jails, etc. that are not currently covered by Energy Star). We will review each quality control check point with the county / cities and finalize based on the county / city’s desired checks. We plan for the data checks to be standardized for all participating cities for consistency, but do have flexibility it a city wishes to have different data check requirements. Building Owner Data Updates Touchstone IQ Help Center staff will update Edina’s covered building list at the beginning of the program year by requesting and analyzing data from the Hennepin County Assessor’s office on Page 146 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com any demolitions, new construction, and owner changes for buildings 25,000 sq ft – 49,999 sq ft in Edina. Additionally, through the course of providing help center outreach and submission support, Touchstone IQ staff will update the database to reflect any new building and/or owner data. For parcels with multiple qualifying buildings, help center staff will assign new Benchmarking ID’s for compliance tracking purposes. Scope 3 – Score Card Development, Distribution, and Map Overview Touchstone IQ will perform the following activities for each Edina Class 3 Buildings • Provide customized feedback on energy use to cities and building owners/managers, including changes to the ordinance to align with the State program, such as the “star” rating. • Develop city-specific data to provide energy use feedback to building owners in the form of an energy report card reported annually to the building owners. o The energy report card will show current reporting data along with comparisons to previous reported data per building. o The energy report card with show the “star” rating, aligned with the State program • Buildings will be included within the state wide interactive public map The following details our approach for providing customized feedback on energy use to cities and building owners/managers. Score Card Development and Distribution Once the program reporting deadline date has passed and upon approval from the City, Touchstone IQ will work with City staff to compile and send out the individual building report cards. The report card creation and data inputs will be automated through Touchstone IQ. Score cards will be distributed through personalized emails, facilitated within Touchstone IQ. Recommended data to be presented in the report cards include, but are not limited to: • Energy Star Score • EUI • How their building compares to peers • Savings potential (high level cost and payback information) • Energy efficiency program support materials (i.e. rebates, incentive programs, tax credits, etc.) • “Star” Rating to align with State Program Page 147 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com Printed report card versions may also be utilized, but printing and postage costs are to be covered by the City. Interactive Map Map Development Touchstone IQ will include the Edina Class 3 buildings within the Efficient Buildings Collaborative web-based interactive map. This map will be used to report out the building benchmarking results to the public. The interactive map design will allow users to view building compliance statistics, Energy Star rating, EUI, as well as compare buildings by size, type, location, and numerous other data points. This data is compiled year-over-year to provide historical comparison ability. The map will integrate directly with Touchstone IQ for Governments software and update automatically as new building reports are submitted. The map will provide enhanced visuals, comparison capabilities and reporting to help promote the goals of the benchmarking program. Scope 4 - Energy Assessment Data Tracking Overview The Touchstone IQ team will design and configure an energy assessment module as part of the existing benchmarking tracking system. The energy assessment module will include tracking on, but not limited to, the following data points. • Energy assessment compliance status • Energy assessment due dates • Energy assessment submissions • Energy assessment exceptions/exemptions • Recommended and implemented energy cost reduction measures o Captured through online form • Voluntary early compliance • Call and email correspondence related to energy assessments from the help center and energy assessors (MN Department of Commerce, MFBE, and large building implementors) Data will be collected through an online form tool and automatically integrated into the benchmarking tracking system. This online form will allow for collecting both data fields as well as building owner uploaded documents. Page 148 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com Submission Management Touchstone IQ will create, manage, and integrate an online energy assessment submission and energy assessment exception/exemption forms. All information related to submissions and correspondence will be tracked and recorded within the energy assessment module or the building record page within the existing database. With guidance from the City, help center staff will review and approve or deny all energy assessment submissions. Energy assessment data will be used by Touchstone IQ and the City to track energy reduction progress and to identify buildings that have made improvements. Compliance Communications and Outreach Touchstone IQ will be responsible for creating the annual list of buildings that need to comply. This will entail identifying the highest 50% of EUIs of the Class 3 buildings, based on existing data in the benchmarking tracking system. Compliance lists will be provided to appropriate energy assessors and will include energy assessment due dates, building information, and contact information. Help Center Staff will perform Outreach activities to help educate building owners on the energy assessment compliance requirement. This will include email blasts and direct phone calls. Touchstone IQ will support direct mailings through the development of content and building address lists. It is expected that the City will cover all costs associated with printing and direct mailer postage. Direct outreach activities will include the following tasks. • Send two formal compliance reminder notices each year (can be combined with benchmarking notices or separate) o Email and mail (Mailer production and distribution costs to be covered by the City) • Send two formal violation reminder notices each year for non-compliant building owners (can be combined with benchmarking notices or separate) o Email and mail (Mailer production and distribution costs to be covered by the City) • After the compliance deadline, staff will call and email non-compliant building owners, if contact information is available • Send emails connecting incentives and resources to address report findings G. Pricing Structure Touchstone IQ proposes to perform the services outlined within the Scope of Work using the following fixed annual fee structure. Touchstone IQ will invoice Edina for 50% of the annual fee on January 1st and the remaining 50% on June 1st of each program year. Page 149 of 365 2000 S. Colorado Blvd. Annex Ste 460. Denver, CO. 80222 | 303-327-9769 | www.touchstoneiq.com Annual Fees: Scope 2025 Scope 1 – Training and Outreach $2,000 Scope 2 – Help Center Administration $9,500 Scope 3 – Score Card Development, Distribution, and Map $2,500 Scope 4 – Energy Assessment Data Tracking $6,500 Total $20,500 • Software and benchmarking services based on supporting an estimated 83 buildings. An increase of 10% or more buildings (mandatory or voluntary) reported and tracked within the Touchstone IQ for Governments software may require a change in annual fee and will be negotiated at that time. • Help Center services are based on a June 1st reporting deadline date. Additional optional scope item fees are also provided below. Additional Optional City Fees: Additional Scope Items Fee Notes Software Annual License (Touchstone IQ for GovernmentsTM) $1,980 Billed per city Site visits (by request only) $1,000 (estimate) Billed based on T&M Separate 1-800 phone number for city $900 Billed per city ACCEPTED BY: Signature: Name: Title: Date: Page 150 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.4 Prepared By: Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Resolution No. 2025-12: Approving Parking Restrictions Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2025-12 approving parking restrictions. Information/Background: All City streets with signs banning parking require a Council resolution. The attached resolution summarizes streets within the 2024 street reconstruction project areas that include no parking signs. Resources/Financial Impacts: The reconstruction projects were budgeted for in the CIP, the signs have been installed and Public Works will maintain them. Relationship to City Policies: The improvements are listed in the 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP numbers 19-312, 19-313 and ENG20020. Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Replacing the infrastructure at the appropriate time is sound asset management practice. Supporting Documentation: 1. Resolution No. 2025-12: Approving Parking Resolution Page 151 of 365 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-12 PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Edina has completed improvements for Southdale B and Concord B and C. WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be restricting parking along specific locations of said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby bans the parking of motor vehicles on the following portions: 1. East side of Barrie Road between West 66th Street and Heritage Drive 2. West side of Barrie Road between West 66th Street and West 65th Street 3. North and south sides of West 65th Street between Drew Avenue and Barrie Road 4. North side of Heritage Drive between 250 feet west of Barrie Road and Xerxes Avenue 5. East side of Concord Avenue between West 64th Street and Valley View Road 6. East and west sides of Wooddale Avenue between Nancy Lane and Garrison Lane 7. East side of Wooddale Avenue between Garrison Lane and Valley View Road 8. West side of Wooddale Avenue at 4545 Valley View Road 9. West side of Wooddale Avenue at 4500 Garrison Lane 10. North and south sides of West 64th Street between Concord Avenue and Millers Lane 11. North side of West 64th Street between Millers Lane and 4500 West 64th Street Dated: January 21, 2025 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of January 21, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Page 152 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.5 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Traffic Safety Report of October 29, 2024 Action Requested: Approve the staff recommendations in the Traffic Safety Report of October 29, 2024. Information/Background: The Traffic Safety Committee recommends action on two items and further study on three items. The Transportation Commission reviewed the report at their November 21 regular meeting; no additional recommendations were provided. See attached report. Resources/Financial Impacts: Traffic control signage and pavement markings within the public right-of-way are owned and maintained by the Public Works Department. Changes or additions to signage or markings will be funded through the Streets Division operating budget or the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. Relationship to City Policies: The recommendations in this report support the goal in the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to "manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes." The staff recommendations are guided by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the City's local traffic policies. Supporting Documentation: 1. Traffic Safety Report of October 29, 2024 Page 153 of 365 January 21, 2025 Mayor and City Council Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Traffic Safety Report of October 29, 2024 Staff Recommendation: Approve the staff recommendations in the Traffic Safety Report of October 29, 2024. Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 29. The Transportation Planner, Assistant City Planner and Public Works Director were in attendance for this meeting. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the January 21 regular meeting. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Request for parking restrictions at Pamela Park entrance driveway Staff recommends No Parking signs on both sides of the south driveway entrance to Pamela Park. The City could consider a future project to increase the width of the driveway to permit one-sided parking. Description Resident is concerned about emergency vehicle access during sporting events at Pamela Park. ADT 161 (2014) 85% Speed 24.5 mph (2014) Crashes One in last 10 years. Unique Circumstances No parking restrictions present. 18’-20’ driveway width. On-street parking is available on south side of 62nd St adjacent to park. Policy Guidance One-sided parking permitted on 24’ streets (Living Streets Plan). On-street parking restricted on streets 20’ or less (City practice). Pamela Park southern driveway Page 154 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 2 A2. Request for safety improvements at 77th St and Computer Ave Staff recommends installing Traffic Signal Ahead signs for eastbound and westbound traffic approaching Computer Ave. Staff will reach out to the property manager at 4700 77th St to request tree trimming to improve visibility. Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study C1. Request for crosswalk markings at Hansen Rd/56th St Staff recommends reviewing pedestrian crossing volumes at the intersection to determine if a marked crosswalk is warranted. C2. Request for parking restrictions on Creek Valley Rd Staff recommends surveying adjacent properties on Creek Valley Rd to determine support for added parking restrictions. Description Resident is concerned about visibility of traffic signal and vehicles running red lights. ADT WB: 7,983 (2018) EB: 10,887 (2018) 85% Speed N/A Crashes Four in last 10 years. Unique Circumstances Traffic signals replaced in 2019. Sight lines in both directions are partially obstructed (by trees in WB; horizontal curve/trees for EB). Policy Guidance Some tree branches are within clear view zone if driveway is treated as “intersecting street.” Description Resident is requesting crosswalk markings south of the intersection between the two ped ramps. AADT Hansen: 1,445 (2019) 56th: 403 (2023) 85% Speed Hansen: N/A 56th: 29 mph (2023) Crashes One in last ten years. Unique Circumstances 56th St is stop-controlled. At-grade railroad crossing with mast arm. Intersection is near Yancey Park. Previous Work Roadways reconstructed in 2021. Sidewalks added in 2021. Policy Guidance Marked crosswalk may be considered depending on ped/bike volumes. Description Resident is concerned with high school traffic parking on both sides of street. ADT 916 (2011) 85% Speed 26.9 mph (2011) Crashes None in last 10 years. Previous Work Roadway reconstructed in 2012. Unique Circumstances No parking restrictions present. 30’ street width. 2018 High School Neighborhood Parking Study suggested parking could be restricted during school hours or permanently on one-side. Policy Guidance Street width and parking is consistent with Local street (Living Streets Plan). 77th St and Computer Ave Hansen Rd and 56th St Creek Valley Rd Page 155 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 3 C3. Request for restriping on 76th St between Edinborough Way and York Ave Staff recommends measuring maximum queue lengths for the existing westbound left turn lane to determine if the lane can be shortened to provide an additional eastbound left turn lane into 7500 York Ave. Description Resident is requesting the addition of protected left turn lane for westbound traffic accessing 7500 York Cooperative. AADT WB: 4,949 (2022) EB: 6,677 (2022) 85% Speed N/A Crashes Two in last 10 years. Unique Circumstances 64’ – 75’ street width. Two thru lanes in each direction, gore area in-between. WB dedicated left-turn and right-turn lanes. EB dedicated left-turn lane. Previous Work Overlaid in 2021. Recommendation Measure max. queue lengths in left-turn lanes to determine if they can be shortened to provide an additional left-turn lane. 76th St, Edinborough Way to York Ave Page 156 of 365 d PURCHASE REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.6 Prepared By: Ryan Browning, IT Director Item Type: Request for Purchase Department: IT Item Title: Request for Purchase: 2025 Computer Replacements Action Requested: Approve Request for Purchase for the annual computer replacements from HP for $138,790. Information/Background: This request is for the purchase of HP desktops and laptops due for replacement in 2025 according to our standard replacement schedule. This replacement will refresh these computers and eliminate age-related technical issues. In 2025, we are expecting to replace at least 80 laptops and 35 desktops. Requisition Number: 12500009 Funding Source: I.T. Central Services Budget Vendor: HP Equipment Status: Replacement Cost: $138,790 Resources/Financial Impacts: This purchase is within budget and will be paid out of the I.T. equipment replacement budget. I.T. staff will configure, order, and install these replacements for our staff around the City. Relationship to City Policies: Regular computer replacements are key to keeping our computers functioning at a high level. Our staff rely on these systems to provide many critical services to City residents. Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Stewardship We time computer replacements to maximize the useful life and minimize productivity loss due to hardware issues. Page 157 of 365 Supporting Documentation: None Page 158 of 365 d PURCHASE REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.7 Prepared By: Ryan Browning, IT Director Item Type: Request for Purchase Department: IT Item Title: Request for Purchase: Security Camera Service and Support Agreement Action Requested: Approve Request for Purchase for the Security Camera Service and Support Agreement from Pro- Tec Design for $25,612. Information/Background: This request is for the purchase of a support and service agreement covering all security cameras in use at City facilities. This agreement covers both labor and materials related to camera failures as well as yearly preventative maintenance servicing.The agreement will not be included in the public packet for security purposes. Requisition Number: 12500011 Funding Source: IT Budget Vendor: Pro-Tec Design Equipment Status: Replacement Cost: $25,612 Resources/Financial Impacts: This purchase is within budget and will be paid out of the I.T. budget. Relationship to City Policies: Support for the City's Security equipment is on the I.T. Department's work plan. Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Security cameras offer a level of protection to many City facilities. By performing regular maintenance on these devices, we are extending their useful life. Page 159 of 365 Supporting Documentation: None Page 160 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.8 Prepared By: Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Item Type: Other Department: Community Development Item Title: Second Amendment to Site Lease Agreement Action Requested: Approve the Second Amendment to Site Lease Agreement. Information/Background: Verizon leases antenna space on the City's water tower at 5849 Ruth Drive. The original agreement was entered into on October 26, 2000 and is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2025. The proposed lease amendment would extend the lease under the existing terms for five additional five- year terms. The Public Works Department has no concerns with extending the lease. The amendment has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office. Resources/Financial Impacts: The City will collect $48,729.60 per year with the rent increasing 20% at each five-year renewal term. Relationship to City Policies: None. Supporting Documentation: 1. Second Amendment to Site Lease Agreement Page 161 of 365 VzW Site Name/ID: MINNORMNDALE / 5000184182 1 VzW Firecracker Amendment – September 5, 2024 SECOND AMENDMENT TO SITE LEASE AGREEMENT This Second Amendment to Site Lease Agreement (“Second Amendment”) is made, and shall be effective, as of the last date of the signatures below (“Effective Date”), between City of Edina (“Landlord”), and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Tenant”). Landlord and Tenant (or their predecessors in interest) entered into that certain Site Lease Agreement dated October 26, 2000, as may have been previously amended and/or assigned, (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Tenant is leasing or licensing from Landlord a portion of that certain property located at 5849 Ruth Drive, Edina, Minnesota, as more particularly described in the Agreement. Landlord and Tenant may be referenced in this Second Amendment individually as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Second Amendment, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Term. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary, the Agreement shall expire on December 31, 2025. Commencing on January 1, 2026, the Agreement shall be extended for 5 years (“Initial Extension Term”). The term of the Agreement shall thereafter automatically extend for 4 additional terms of 5 years each (each, an “Additional Extension Term”), unless Tenant terminates the Agreement by giving Landlord notice of such termination at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the Initial Extension Term or then-current Additional Extension Term. 2. Rent. Commencing on January 1, 2026, the annual rent during the Initial Extension Term shall be $48,729.60 to be paid in advance to Landlord or such other person as Landlord may designate in writing at least 30 days in advance of any rental payment date. Thereafter, commencing on January 1, 2031, annual rent for each Additional Extension Term shall increase by 20% upon commencement of each Additional Extension Term. 3. Notice Address. The notice address for Tenant in the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: If to Tenant: Verizon Wireless Attn: Network Real Estate 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, NJ 07921 With a copy to: Basking Ridge Mail Hub Attn: Legal Intake One Verizon Way Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 4. Continued Effect. Except as amended hereby, all of the other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between any term and provision of the Agreement and this Second Amendment, the terms and provisions of this Second Amendment shall control. In addition, except as otherwise stated in this Second Page 162 of 365 VzW Site Name/ID: MINNORMNDALE / 5000184182 2 VzW Firecracker Amendment – September 5, 2024 Amendment, all initially capitalized terms shall have the same respective defined meaning stated in the Agreement. All captions are for reference purposes only and shall not be used in the construction or interpretation of this Second Amendment. 5. Ratification and Reaffirmation. Landlord and Tenant do hereby ratify, reaffirm, adopt, contract for and agree to be, or continue to be, bound by all of the terms and conditions of the above-referenced Agreement. Except as modified by this Second Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated by reference herein as if set forth at length. It is acknowledged and agreed that the execution of this Second Amendment by the Parties is not intended to and shall not constitute a release of either Party from any obligation or liability which said Party has to the other pursuant to the Agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] Page 163 of 365 VzW Site Name/ID: MINNORMNDALE / 5000184182 3 VzW Firecracker Amendment – September 5, 2024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment is effective and entered into as of the date last written below. Landlord: City of Edina By: Name: Title: Date: Tenant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: Name: Title: Date: Page 164 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.9 Prepared By: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Fire Item Title: Approve Amendment to Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services Agreement between Bloomington and Edina Action Requested: Approve amendment to Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Agreement with City of Bloomington. Information/Background: This amendment extends the existing agreement between the City of Edina and City of Bloomington for the implementation and provision of Foundational Public Health Responsibilities (FPHR) as designated by the Commissioner of Health in the FPHR Grant. This agreement is completely funded by the FPHR Grant funds. The amendment for 2025 is $169,984. Resources/Financial Impacts: Impact will be staff time spend on administrative tasks associated with grant activities and some networking/connecting of Bloomington Public Health staff assigned to grant work with resources and people in Edina. Relationship to City Policies: N/A Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Health This funding and agreement will identify Public Health activities and services considered foundational and fill gaps in capacity, staffing and funding to fill those gaps. This is annual funding that is intended to ensure people in Edina and across Minnesota have access to foundational Public Health services. Equity Foundational Public Health Responsibilities (FPHR) include the ability to systematically integrate equity into each aspect of the FPHR, strategic priorities, and include equity-related accountability metrics into all program areas. Page 165 of 365 Engagement FPHR includes the ability to directly engage in health policy development, discussion, and adoption with local, state, and national policymakers, and to define a strategic direction for public health initiatives, including the advancement of equity. Sustainability FPHR include the participation in broad land use planning and sustainable development to encourage decisions that promote positive public health outcomes and resilient communities (e.g., housing and urban development, recreational facilities, transportation systems and climate change). Stewardship FPHR includes the ability to establish a budgeting, auditing, billing, and financial system and chart of expense and revenue accounts in compliance with federal, state, and local standards and policies; the ability to secure grants and other funding and administer the in compliance with funding requirements; the ability to leverage funding and ensure resources are allocated to address equity and social determinants of health. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2025 Edina Bloomington Amendment FPHR Services Page 166 of 365 Agreement ID: 2024-9 FIRST AMENDMENT TO FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSIBILITIES SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made on ______________________ by and between CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (“Bloomington”), and CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (“Edina”). Bloomington and Edina are herein referred to collectively as the “Parties.” WHEREAS, Bloomington and Edina are parties to an Agreement dated January 1, 2024 (Agreement ID 2024-051) pursuant to which Bloomington is responsible for providing Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services to the Residents of Edina (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement ends June 30, 2025. Parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term until June 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, Parties desire to amend the Agreement to include additional services as detailed in Exhibit C, and update the terms of payment in Exhibit D; and WHEREAS, Parties desire to amend the Agreement to increase the total amount of work authorized, including reimbursable expenses, by $169,984.00 for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $342,784.00; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this First Amendment, Parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Services to be Provided: Bloomington agrees to provide the residents of Edina with Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services as set forth in Bloomington’s Scope of Services attached to this Agreement as Exhibits A and C or any supplemental letter agreements entered into between the Parties (“Services”). The Services referenced in the attached Exhibits A and C or any supplemental letter agreements shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All Services shall be provided in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by contractors currently providing similar services.” 2. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Time for Completion. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from Effective Date and continuing until June 30, 2026, unless terminated by either Party or amended pursuant to the Agreement.” 3. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Consideration: The consideration, which Edina shall pay to Bloomington, shall not exceed $342,784.00, pursuant to the terms of payment set forth in Exhibit B and D and incorporated into this Agreement. Page 167 of 365 2 4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not modified by this First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to the Agreement have caused this First Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Interim City Manager Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. __________________________________ City Attorney CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: City Manager Page 168 of 365 3 EXHIBIT C TO FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSIBILITES SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this funding is to support the implementation of Foundational Public Health Responsibilities (FPHR) by community health boards (grantees). The FPHR are the unique responsibilities of governmental public health that define a minimum package of public health capabilities and programs that must be available in every community. This funding must be used to fulfill foundational public health responsibilities as defined by the Commissioner of Health in consultation with the State Community Health Service Advisory Committee (SCHSAC). Based on the recommendation of SCHSAC, Grantees cannot use these funds for non-FPHR activities at this time. More details on the Foundational Public Health Responsibilities and examples of the work supported by these funds can be found on the MDH website: Funding for Foundational Public Health Responsibilities. Duties: 1. Bloomington and Edina shall complete, and update as necessary, proposed activities and a workplan for MDH approval in REDCap. This workplan will assure compliance with funding requirements and make connections with other grantees. Any changes made to the original proposal must be reviewed and approved by MDH. 2. Bloomington and Edina shall complete a proposed budget in REDCap by the date provided to them by MDH. Any revisions made to the original budget must be made in REDCap and reviewed by MDH. 3. Bloomington and Edina shall implement activities to carry out foundational public health responsibilities in accordance with the definitions outlined on the Funding for Foundational Public Health Responsibilities website and Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Grant Expenditure Guide. 4. Bloomington and Edina shall provide requested financial and programmatic reporting information by the dates provided to them by MDH to meet funding reporting and monitoring requirements. Page 169 of 365 4 EXHIBIT D TO FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSIBILITES SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA TERMS OF PAYMENT A. The Parties agree to allocate the costs of the Services in accordance with each city’s share of the total services provided by Bloomington to all three cities (Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield) as identified below. During the term of this Agreement, Edina shall pay Bloomington the total not-to-exceed amount of $342,784.00 for Foundational Public Health Services. Share of total cost Allocation Method Bloomington Edina Richfield Costs shared equally with an adjustment for social vulnerability index of each city 36%28%36% B. Bloomington will provide quarterly itemized invoices to Edina on the following dates: Invoice Dates: April 15, 2025 July 15, 2025 October 15, 2025 January 15, 2026 April 15, 2026 July 15, 2026 C. Edina shall make payment to Bloomington within 30 days of receipt of Bloomington’s invoice. Page 170 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.10 Prepared By: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Fire Item Title: Approve Amendment to Local Public Health Services Agreement Between Edina and Bloomington Action Requested: Approve Amendment to Local Public Health Services Agreement Between Edina and Bloomington for 2025 Information/Background: This is an annual contract agreement for public health services between Edina and Bloomington which has been in place since 1977 and provides people in Edina access to local public health services. The 2025 amendment is for $442,000. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement. Resources/Financial Impacts: • Budget – This is budgeted for each year and is partially funded by the Local Public Health Grant from the Minnesota Department of Health and the required local match. • Implementation – Fire Department - Public Health Division administers the agreement • Operation – Fire Department - Public Health Division conducts any operations and administration relative to the agreement Relationship to City Policies: Aligns with Health-in-all-Policies section of the Edina Comprehensive Plan as well as portions of the Edina Climate Action Plan Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Health Agreement provides people in Edina access to wide range of public health services. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2025 Bloomington and Edina Services Amendment LPH Services Page 171 of 365 Agreement ID: 2024-7 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made on ______________________ by and between CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (“Bloomington”), and CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (“Edina”), each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties.” WHEREAS, Bloomington and Edina are parties to an Agreement dated January 1, 2020 (Agreement ID 2019-649), as amended by a First Amendment dated December 31, 2020 (Agreement ID 2020-517), as amended by a Second Amendment dated December 21, 2021 (Agreement ID 2021-765), as amended by a Third Amendment dated January 5, 2023 (Agreement ID 2022-833), as amended by a Fourth Amendment dated January 13, 2024 (Agreement ID 2023- 804), pursuant to which Bloomington is responsible for providing Public Health Services to the residents of Edina (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement ends December 31, 2024. Parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term until December 31, 2025; and WHEREAS, Parties desire to amend the Agreement to include additional services for the 2025 contract year as set forth in Exhibit K, and updated pricing for the 2025 contract year as set forth in Exhibit L; and WHEREAS, Parties desire to amend the Agreement to increase the total amount of work authorized, including reimbursable expenses, by $442,000.00 for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $2,252,000.00; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this Fifth Amendment, Parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Services to be Provided: Bloomington agrees to provide the residents of Edina with Public Health Services as set forth in Bloomington’s Scope of Services attached to this Agreement as Exhibits A, C, E, G, H, I, and K or any supplemental letter agreements entered into between the Parties (“Services”). The Services referenced in the attached Exhibits A, C, E, G, H, I, and K or any supplemental letter agreements shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All Services shall be provided in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by contractors currently providing similar services.” 2. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Time for Completion. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from January 1, 2025 and continuing until December 31, 2025, unless terminated by either Party or amended pursuant to the Agreement.” 3. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Consideration: The consideration, which Edina shall pay to Bloomington, shall not exceed $2,252,000.00, Page 172 of 365 2 pursuant to the terms of payment set forth in Exhibits L and incorporated into this Agreement 4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not modified by this Fifth Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to the Agreement have caused this Fifth Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: City Manager Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. __________________________________ City Attorney CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its:___________________________ Page 173 of 365 3 EXHIBIT K TO LOCAL PUBLIC HELTH SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.Bloomington agrees to provide residents of Edina with Public Health Services, which include activities designed to protect and promote the health of the general population within a community health service area by emphasizing the prevention of disease, injury, disability, and preventable death through the promotion of effective coordination and use of community resources, and by extending Public Health Services into the community. 2.Bloomington agrees to provide Public Health Services to the residents of Edina in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised, and utilizing the same quality and kind of personnel, equipment and facilities, as Public Health Services are provided and rendered to residents of Bloomington. 3.Bloomington shall provide the Public Health Services pursuant hereto on a confidential basis, using capable, trained professionals. 4.Bloomington shall require medical malpractice insurance coverage by its physicians and other licensed professionals with whom Bloomington has a contract for professional services. 5.All Public Health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington shall be rendered pursuant to and subject to public health policies, rules, and procedures now or hereafter, from time to time, adopted by the Bloomington City Council, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws. 6.It shall be Bloomington's sole responsibility to determine the qualifications, functions, training, and performance standards for all personnel rendering Public Health Services under this Agreement. 7.Bloomington will communicate with Edina relative to Public Health Services to be performed hereunder, in the form of reports, conferences, or consultations, as Edina shall request. All reports relating to the provision of Public Health Services that are given by Bloomington to the Bloomington City Council or to the Bloomington City Manager during the term of this Agreement shall also be given to Edina. 8.Bloomington also agrees to send to Edina an annual report describing Page 174 of 365 4 the Public Health Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. Said report shall be in such detail and form as Edina may reasonably request. Also, at Edina's request, made not more than five (5) times during the term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of Bloomington's Division of Public Health shall attend meetings of the Edina City Council, or appropriate board or commission, to answer questions and give further information relative to the activities performed and Public Health Services rendered under this Agreement. 9.Bloomington will also provide services to Edina for Title V Maternal Child Health (MCH) and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) to qualifying women, infants, children and adolescents. Edina agrees to assign its rights to Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) funding provided for the MCH and TANF programs for fiscal year 2023 to Bloomington. Bloomington will complete all required services, reports and documentation for these programs and will directly invoice MDH for the MCH and TANF services that Bloomington provides to Edina residents. Page 175 of 365 5 EXHIBIT L TO LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA TERMS OF PAYMENT 1.The parties agree to allocate the costs of the Services in accordance with each city's share of the total services provided by Bloomington to all three cities (Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield) as identified below. 2.Edina shall pay Bloomington the total not-to-exceed amount of $2,252,000 for Services during the term of this Agreement. Share of total costAllocation method Description of Service Bloomington Edina Richfield Agreed-upon Administration and 65%17.5%17.5% percentage of Planning & Health cost Promotion infrastructure (fixed)Internal service 80%10%10% charges Accreditation 33%33%33% By population (as estimated by the American Community Survey) DP&C Community Resource Team Outbreak response SHIP 49%30%21% By number of Maternal Health clients in each city Clinical Services (changes annually) Share of total cost will change each year based on # of clients per city, according to the following formula: (Clients served in Edina) ------------------------------------------ = share of total cost (Clients served in all three cities) Direct expense All others Cost of service provided Page 176 of 365 6 3.Bloomington will invoice Edina for the Services according to the following terms: Invoice Date Amount April 15, 2025 $110,500 July 15, 2025 $110,500 October 15, 2025 $110,500 January 15, 2026 $110,500 4.Edina shall make payment to Bloomington within thirty (30) days of receipt after Bloomington's invoice. Page 177 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.11 Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager Item Type: Other Department: Administration Item Title: League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues Action Requested: Approve payment of League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues for $36,932. Information/Background: The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) provides services to member cities including education, training, policy development, risk management, and advocacy. Annual membership dues for the City are $36,932. Members of LMC can also participate in League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). The City's property, casualty, and worker's compensation insurance is through LMCIT. Supporting Documentation: 1. LMC Membership Dues 2025 2. LMC Annual Report 2023-2024 Page 178 of 365 Membership Dues Invoice Invoice Number: For the Period covering January 1 - December 31, 2025 418862 Population: 54,480 Dues Amount: $36,932 (Dues amount rounded to nearest dollar.) (Population represents the 2023 State Demographer and Metropolitan Council Estimates.) City of Edina Dues are based on your population. See how we calculated your dues at: www.lmc.org/dues For membership dues in the League of Minnesota Cities for the year beginning January 1, 2025. Annual dues for membership in the League of Minnesota Cities include subscriptions to Minnesota Cities magazine.* Pursuant to the disclosure requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 6.76, the proportionate amount of dues spent for lobbying purposes is 10.4%. This percentage is reported to the State Auditor as required by statute. Payment from Public Funds Authorized by Minn. Stats, Sec. 465.58 I declare under the penalties of law that the foregoing account is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. Dated: January 1, 2025 Please Remit To: Finance Department League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Ave W St Paul, MN 55103-2044 Include this invoice or reference invoice #418862 with your payment. Questions: billing@lmc.org Luke Fischer Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities *Annual dues include subscriptions to Minnesota Cities magazine at $30 per subscription; the League reserves the right to limit the number of magazine subscriptions a member organization receives. This information is provided to meet USPS regulations; please do not factor in the value of the subscription when paying your dues invoice. The League will routinely communicate via e-mail with your city’s staff and elected officials as part of your membership in the League. Page 179 of 365 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ANNUALREPORT20232024 DRIVING PROGRESS The League takes action on what matters most to members. Page 180 of 365 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES & LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST • ANNUAL REPORT 2023-2024 Message From Executive Director Luke Fischer Future-Focused, Foundation-Built I’ll admit it — this is a daunting time to be a city leader. We are living in an era when people are openly questioning the value of public institutions and public service more than ever before. The pressure to provide core city services and quality-of-life improvements while continuing to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars — all while under intense scrutiny from the public — can seem overwhelming at times. And yet, I remain endlessly optimistic about the future of cities in Minnesota, and I think you should be, too. Why, you may ask, do I feel so positive when our social media feeds and heated public hearings seem to skew so negative? Well, I am positive because I see the great things our communities are doing every day, from basics like making sure streets are plowed in the winter to bold new ideas like housing initiatives and sustainability efforts. I see communities come together to help their neighbors when cities are hit with floods or tornadoes. I see city leaders passionately testify at the State Capitol on critical issues. I see elected officials and city staff sharing knowledge and ideas at events and meetings across the state. Just as I’m optimistic about the future of Minnesota’s cities, I am also excited about the League’s role in helping cities be the best they can be. As you will read in this annual report, this year we invested time and resources geared toward preparing our members and our organization for the future: We expanded our Grant Navigator program to help more cities apply for and secure state and federal grants. We successfully lobbied lawmakers on key issues like housing, EMS funding, and cannabis regulation. We developed numerous new resources and learning opportunities on topics like cybersecurity, public safety wellness, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). We’re hiring additional staff in our human resources and intergovernmental relations departments to keep up with members’ increased needs for support. All the while, we continue to be a steady source of support on the bread-and-butter issues that every city deals with such as budgeting, council and staff transitions, and navigating new laws. Over the past year, the League has worked hard to lift up the communities we serve and convey their value by lending expert support and guidance. As we look ahead, you can expect the League to continue to build on the solid foundation we have created over the past 111 years. Now is not the time to be small; it is a time to make meaningful investments that will benefit Minnesota communities today and well into the future. Page 181 of 365 Grant Navigator helps jumpstart your project funding process The Grant Navigator program provides funding to help your city with grant writing for local projects. Since launching in late 2022, the League has supported 59 projects in 61 cities, 90% of which are in Greater Minnesota. About $300,000 has been invested to support applications that have returned over $13 million in grants, spurring over $70 million in projects for cities. We’ve also been pursuing opportunities to augment the League’s investment. During the summer of 2024, the McKnight Foundation made a $200,000 award and the Margaret A. Cargill Foundation Fund at the Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation made a $100,000 award to the League, providing philanthropic funding over the next two years to increase Grant Navigator’s reach. Special programs to support accessible, inclusive communities This year, education and resources were developed to help you create more accessible, inclusive, and accommodating communities for all residents. Elected Leaders Institute Offered via two programs, Foundational and Advanced, the Elected Leaders Institute provided the nuts and bolts of city government and higher-level leadership skills, respectively. This year, 50 newly elected leaders participated in the Foundational Program, and 142 attendees participated in the Advanced Program. 2023 Clerks Academy In 2023, 109 city clerks from across Minnesota learned, networked, and prepared for challenges in their complex role through a blended program of online and in-person sessions. City Day on the Hill More than 200 city officials from throughout the state traveled to the State Capitol in March to help increase the visibility of cities as key partners in the policymaking process. 2024 Annual Conference The event returned to Rochester for the first time since 2017 to great success. The three-day conference in June saw 562 attendees come together for 24 educational sessions, keynote speakers, a bustling exhibit hall, mobile tours, an awards show and dinner, and numerous networking opportunities. FAQ resources Following Minnesota’s impactful 2023 legislative session, League staff did a deep dive into several new laws including earned sick and safe time and adult-use cannabis. To help answer your questions, League staff created webpages with frequently asked questions and continue to update as the laws and guidance change. This past year, you’ve had support through education, events, partnerships, and resources, including: 2024 Safety and Loss Control Workshops focused on the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The sessions covered common ADA issues in city buildings, navigating complex employee medical issues in the workplace, and how you and your city can go beyond the law’s legal requirements to create more welcoming communities and workplaces. The League’s 5-day DEI challenge aimed to make learning about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) easy, accessible, and minimally time-consuming. Nearly 300 participants learned, engaged with, and gained practical tools to apply DEI in their lives and cities. Promoting excellence in local government is foundational to the League’s work. That’s achieved, in part, through providing expert analysis and trusted guidance for all Minnesota cities. Laying the Groundwork Page 182 of 365 Advocating for Cities Progress at the Legislature Throughout the 2024 session, the League continued advocating for city priorities and interests, including efforts to improve existing laws related to school resource officers (SROs), adult-use cannabis, and earned sick and safe time. We also focused on securing funding and support for transportation, housing, and emergency medical services (EMS). Here’s a closer look. SRO resolution In 2023, the Legislature updated laws on student rights and behavior. The amended law generated conflicting legal interpretations and caused confusion about when school resource officers (SROs) could use restraints or reasonable force. This uncertainty led some law enforcement agencies to end their SRO contracts with schools due to potential legal risks. Early in the session, we collaborated with various stakeholders to reach a bipartisan agreement clarifying SROs’ authority. EMS funding and task force In recent years, communities across Minnesota have faced challenges with emergency medical services delivery. To address this, the League and other stakeholders formed a task force in fall 2023 and made it a priority to address this challenge legislatively and administratively. Strides were made during the 2024 legislative session when $24 million was secured for rural ambulance services and $6 million for sprint medic pilot programs in Grant, St. Louis, and Otter Tail counties. Starting in January 2025, a new Office of Emergency Medical Services will replace the Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board. While these measures are a positive step, challenges in providing ambulance services remain. We will continue to work with the task force to find solutions for regional and statewide EMS issues. Housing Housing continues to be an important topic for cities across Minnesota and at the Legislature. During the 2024 legislative session, $50 million was authorized for housing infrastructure. On the policy side, League staff and city leaders played a vital role in helping lawmakers better understand how limiting city zoning and land use authority could affect communities. Legislation like the “Missing Middle Housing” bill and the “People Over Parking Act” were not passed into law, allowing cities to continue making housing-related decisions that best serve their communities’ unique needs. Lead pipe replacement Prior to spring 2024, cities had been prevented from replacing private lead service lines because the work would have had to be reported as taxable income against the property owner. In a major win for cities nationwide, the Internal Revenue Service issued formal clarification that work done by water service providers to replace lead service lines on private properties will not need to be reported as taxable income. That announcement culminated a year-long campaign by the League, elected leaders, and other stakeholders to have that tax barrier removed to address the significant potential public health risks of private lead service connections. Action at the federal level Page 183 of 365 Prioritizing Safety One of the key responsibilities of cities is to keep residents and visitors safe. State law grants cities wide-ranging powers to maintain good order, protect property, prevent crime, and promote health and safety. The League is here to support you in these efforts. Here’s how we have helped over the past year. The League continues to prioritize the physical and mental well-being of police officers, firefighters, and other first responders. We strive to ensure our members’ public safety personnel have the resources and tools they need to stay healthy and, if mental or physical injuries occur, they receive the care they need to get well and return to work. This year, we: Public safety wellness Helped cities navigate the new public safety duty disability law, which went into effect July 1, 2023. Premiered an award-winning video, “Behind the Badge: Mental Wellness in Law Enforcement,” in which police officers and chiefs shared their personal mental health challenges and recovery journeys. Completed a pilot project with the cities of Moorhead, Madelia, and Chaska to implement a five-step public safety mental health action guide for city leaders. Added resources to our online PTSD and Mental Health Toolkit, including updated information on suicide prevention, family support programs, retirement planning, and chaplaincy programs. The iMPACT Project, conducted by Benchmark Analytics on behalf of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, is a multi-year research initiative that is entering an implementation phase, characterized by expanded engagement and a deepening of existing research. Nearly 100 law enforcement agencies across Minnesota have been involved in the project, which aims to study best practices that can help law enforcement agencies reduce liability claims. In its third year, the project focused on: iMPACT Project/Benchmark Analytics Creating a long-term work plan focused on developing education and training materials for members based on the findings of our research. Piloting new law enforcement engagement channels to broaden awareness of the iMPACT findings. Advocating for adoption of evidence- based practices through collaboration with command staff. As cyberattacks against governments and businesses continue to make headlines, we have been busy helping cities prevent cyber incidents and prepare for what to do if an attack were to hit your systems. In addition to working one-on-one with dozens of city officials to help address specific cyber-related concerns, we: Launched a seven- part “Cybersecurity for Cities” series of courses available through our MemberLearn online learning platform. Cybersecurity Created planning templates related to business continuity, disaster recovery, and incident response to help cities take inventory of the technology tools they need to function and develop plans to help recover after a cyber incident. Piloted two full-day, in-person cybersecurity courses with the Norwich University Applied Research Institute, which received federal funding to deliver cyber training to government agencies. Page 184 of 365 1.4 million Unique views on the League’s website $2.6 billion Balance in the League- sponsored 4M (Minnesota Municipal Money Market) Fund cash management and investment program for municipal organizations 4,703 Members attended events 3,929 Courses completed in the MemberLearn online learning platform 1,225 Members in the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust MEMBERS921 Total League membership, including cities, townships, and special districts Essay contest entries from 4th-6th grade students throughout Minnesota 530 MAYORFOR ADAY Minnesota law enforcement agencies participated in the Peace officer Accredited TRaining OnLine (PATROL) program 376 Represented at in-person visits by League staff and board members 101 cities Members in the League’s Business Alliance Program REACHCITIES! 38 State legislators recognized by the League for their efforts in advancing city priorities 25 Legislators of Distinction New Clerk’s First Aid Kit: 1 BY THE NUMBERS 2023-2024 A helpful guide for a city council if the city clerk unexpectedly leaves, or for a new clerk that does not have initial access to training Inquiries responded to on legal, human resources, technology, and financial topics 4,855 ??? Since 2023, the League has focused on supporting our staff through improved onboarding, professional development opportunities, and new strategic initiatives to better coordinate our work serving you. Page 185 of 365 LMC & LMCIT Financial Highlights Our financial base continues to be strong, allowing us to deliver many resources and services to our members over the past year. Here are a few details: Of the 855 cities in Minnesota in fiscal year 2023, 98% were members of the League. LMC, including the Building Company, had a net position of $17.6 million and assets of $27.5 million. The League’s General Fund unassigned fund balance as of Aug. 31, 2023, was 35% of the following year’s total budgeted expenditures and transfers, falling within the 25%-35% range set in the fiscal policies. LMCIT had a combined net position of $215.2 million and assets of $628.7 million. In December 2023, LMCIT distributed dividends totaling $3 million to members of its property/casualty program, bringing the total amount of returned dividends since 1987 to $366 million. League members approve fiscal year change At the League’s annual business meeting in June 2024, members voted in favor of changing the organization’s fiscal year to a calendar year starting in 2026. Due to this change, members will receive two invoices — one in September 2024 and another in January 2025 — to cover the 16-month transition period before the change goes into effect. Starting in 2026, members will receive one annual invoice each January. LMC GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Total: $12,722,194* Salaries & Benefits Contractual Services Transfers Other LMC GENERAL FUND REVENUES & TRANSFERS Total: $13,725,135* LMCIT Cost Sharing Other Dues Institutional Fee LMCIT EXPENDITURES Total: $110,413,639** Claims General & Administrative Reinsurance Dividends LMCIT PREMIUM REVENUES Total: $165,121,831** Premiums Investments/ Other 67%15% 8% 32%25% 16%27% 10% * LMC numbers are the most recent audited numbers from fiscal year 2023 (9/1/22-8/31/23). ** LMCIT numbers reflect property/casualty program financials as of 5/31/23 and workers’ compensation program financials as of 12/31/23, the most recent audited numbers. 52%25% 14% 9% 91% 9% Page 186 of 365 ©2024 League of Minnesota Cities. All Rights Reserved. OUR MISSION The League of Minnesota Cities promotes excellence in local government through effective advocacy, expert analysis, and trusted guidance for all Minnesota cities. OUR VISION We envision a future for Minnesota and the League where: • All cities are thriving, taking advantage of new opportunities, and successfully meeting ongoing challenges. • The League continues to provide premier service to its members, and is recognized as the trusted, authoritative, and unified voice on issues affecting cities. 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 lmc.org MinnesotaCities League of Minnesota Cities Minnesota_Cities MinnesotaCities#MnCities LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 2023-JUNE 2024 PRESIDENT Jenny Max City Administrator, Nisswa FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Justin Miller City Administrator, Lakeville SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Wendy Berry Council Member, West St. Paul PAST PRESIDENT Ron Johnson Council Member, Bemidji DIRECTORS Amy Brendmoen Council Member, St. Paul Mary Gaasch Mayor, Lauderdale Sharon Hanson City Administrator, Marshall Andrew Johnson Council Member, Minneapolis Courtney Johnson Mayor, Carver Phil Kern City Administrator, Delano Scott Neal City Manager, Edina Audrey Nelsen Council Member, Willmar Larry Odebrecht Council Member, Stillwater Clinton Rogers City Administrator, Janesville Evan Vogel City Administrator, Cambridge Chris Volkers City Administrator, Oakdale CGMC REPRESENTATIVE Brian Holmer Mayor, Thief River Falls METRO CITIES REPRESENTATIVE Jay Stroebel City Administrator, Brooklyn Park MAOSC REPRESENTATIVE Brian HeckCity Administrator, Montgomery LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2024 CHAIRDave CallisterCity Manager, Plymouth VICE CHAIR Anna GruberCity Administrator, Sartell TRUSTEES Jake Benson Council Member, Proctor Luke Fischer Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities Clinton GridleyCity Administrator, Woodbury Audrey NelsenCouncil Member, Willmar Alison ZelmsCity Administrator, Rochester Page 187 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 6.12 Prepared By: Pa Thao, Finance Director Item Type: Ordinance Department: Finance Item Title: Ordinance No. 2025-02: Setting Morningside Water Rates Action Requested: Approve Ordinance No. 2025-02: Amending Code Section 2-724 Schedule A, setting Morningside water rates for 2025, and grant first reading. Information/Background: The City of Minneapolis provides the water used by much of the Morningside area of Edina. Edina pays Minneapolis for the water that comes into our City from Minneapolis based on a contracted rate. The contracted rate that Edina pays is proportional to the rates the Minneapolis City Council sets for their own residents. The Minneapolis rate for 2025 is $3.11 per 100 cubic feet of water, a 5.44% increase over the 2024 rate. The City of Edina also provides services to this area in the form of meter reading, billing, water distribution infrastructure, and other services except for water itself. To help offset the cost of these Edina-provided services, staff recommends increasing the Edina charge by 5% to 0.93/1,000 gallons in 2025. This rate adjustment is consistent with the rates recommended by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, in the 2022 utility rate study. The recommended Morningside water rate for 2025 is $5.09 per 1,000 gallon of water. Below is the rate history and the recommended rate for 2025. (per 1,000 gal) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Minneapolis charge 3.49 3.60 3.74 3.94 4.16 Edina charge 0.77 0.80 0.84 0.88 0.93 Total Rate $4.26 $4.40 $4.58 $4.82 $5.09 For areas of Edina that do not receive Minneapolis water, the 2025 adopted rates are $2.67, $4.06, or $6.70 per 1,000 gallons, depending on type and quantity of usage. Another difference between Minneapolis and Edina water is Minneapolis delivers softened water, while Edina residents use home water softener systems. Resources/Financial Impacts: Utility Fund Relationship to City Policies: This is essential to our City policy and infrastructure. Supporting Documentation: 1. Ordinance No. 2025-02: Setting Morningside Water Rates Page 188 of 365 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 2-724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter and Section Purpose of Fee/Charge 2024 Fee Proposed 2025 Fee Chapter 28 28-43(b) Water Service: 1. Per 1,000 gallons for areas of city, except in the Morningside area $4.82 Per 1,000 gallons—Morningside area $5.09 Per 1,000 gallons—Morningside area Section 2. The effective date of Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be March 1, 2025. First Reading: January 21, 2025 Second Reading: February 4, 2025 Published: Attest: ____________________________ ______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT. SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK Page 189 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 7.1 Prepared By: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Type: Proclamation Department: Engineering Item Title: Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 27-31, 2025 Action Requested: Adopt Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 27-31, 2025. Information/Background: The City joins other local governments across the region in celebrating January 27-31 as Winter Salt Week. Winter Salt Week is intended to raise awareness and urge all residents, businesses, and city departments to take part in activities and initiatives that promote the responsible use of deicing salt and encourage the adoption of winter maintenance strategies which maintain safety while reducing environmental harm. Resources/Financial Impacts: Relationship to City Policies: Clean Water Strategy, Water Resources Management Plan Budget Pillar: Reliable Service Livable City Values Impact: Stewardship Reducing overuse of salt reduces infrastructure damage from corrosion without compromising safety. Engagement Everyone has a part to play in staying safe while reducing salt overuse. Community events and programs increase knowledge about the issue and potential solutions. Sustainability Reducing overuse of salt protects water without compromising safety. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2025 Winter Salt Week Proclamation Page 190 of 365 PROCLAMATION: WINTER SALT WEEK JANUARY 27-31, 2025 WHEREAS, the City of Edina relies on deicing salt as part of its winter maintenance program to maintain safe and accessible roadways; and WHEREAS, all the salt applied to roadways ends up in our freshwater; and WHEREAS, chloride contamination from deicing salt has been found in lakes, streams, and groundwater in Edina’s Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek watersheds and across the state; and WHEREAS, reducing overuse of deicing salt reduces damage to infrastructure and property, protects freshwater resources, and reduces harm to aquatic plants and animals; and WHEREAS, it is crucial to raise awareness among residents, businesses, and local government agencies about the responsible use of deicing salt to protect both public safety and the long-term health of our freshwater resources; and WHEREAS, Winter Salt Week provides an opportunity to educate our community about the responsible use of deicing salt, including environmental considerations and effective application methods; and WHEREAS, the residents of Edina can contribute to deicing salt pollution reduction efforts locally by learning about smart salting practices, engaging in safe winter driving, hiring trained service providers, and participating in the ‘Low Salt, No Salt, Minnesota’ program; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to promoting a sustainable approach to winter maintenance for the benefit of present and future generations; NOW, THEREFORE, we the City Council of the City of Edina, proclaim January 27-31, 2025 as “WINTER SALT WEEK” In the City of Edina and urge all residents, businesses, and city departments to take part in activities and initiatives that promote the responsible use of deicing salt and encourage the adoption of winter maintenance strategies which maintain safety while reducing environmental harm. Dated this 21st day of January, 2025. ___________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 191 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 7.2 Prepared By: Chad Millner, Engineering Director Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Rosland Park Pedestrian Bridge Update Action Requested: Informational only. Information/Background: The project team of Bolton & Menk and Snow Kreilich Architects have advanced the project to 30% design. Both will be present to assist with a project update. This update will preview a future request for purchase with a bridge fabricator. This project has unique steel truss angles and attachments. A bridge fabricator will be added to the team to provide input on attachment details of the facade, cost estimating, transport of the bridge pieces and eventually provide the steel truss bridge. A fabricator added to the team will ensure the project can advance from 30% to bid documents in the most cost effective manner with less risk. Resources/Financial Impacts: The project has a $6 million budget. It will be constructed, owned and operated by the city. Relationship to City Policies: This project aligns with the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and the Comprehensive Plan. Supporting Documentation: None Page 192 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 8.1 Prepared By: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Item Title: PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-11 approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and Resolution No. 2025-10 Vacating Public Utility Easement Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-11 approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and Resolution No. 2025-10 Vacating Public Utility Easement. Information/Background: This action is the follow up to the approvals granted by the City Council last November to purchase the property, establish a conservation easement on the site and assess the costs back to residents in area. (See attached approval Resolutions No. 2024-90 and No. 2024-91) The specific request is a Preliminary/Final Plat to Replat three lots (5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, 6012 Pine Grove Road) for the purpose of creating an Outlot at 5235 Highwood Drive and placing it in a perpetual conservation easement to preserve and protect the existing mature trees. A portion of 5235 Highwood Drive would be added the adjacent properties at 5229 Highwood Drive and 6012 Pine Grove Road and the remainder turned into the Outlot with conservation easement. There would be no new lot created. This proposal also includes that the public utility easements be vacated at 5235 Highwood Dr W and 6012 Pine Grove Rd. There are no utilities within the easement to be vacated. New utility easements are established along the new lot lines in the Plat. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Re-Plat. Vote: 5 Ayes, 1 Nay, 1 abstention. Resources/Financial Impacts: Relationship to City Policies: Supporting Documentation: 1. Planning Commission Staff Report 2. Applicant Narrative and Plans/Plat 3. Site Location 4. Res No. 2025-10 5. Res. No. 2025-11 6. Conservation Easement 7. Resolution No. 2024-90 (Approving Acquisition of the Property) 8. Resolution No. 2024-91 (Approving Adoption of Special Assessments) 9. Better Together Public Input Report Page 193 of 365 January 15, 2025 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary/Final Plat to Plat an Outlot – 5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, 6012 Pine Grove Road Information / Background: Andrew Carter is proposing Preliminary/Final Plat to Replat three lots (5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, 6012 Pine Grove Road) for the purpose of creating an Outlot at 5235 Highwood Drive and placing it in a perpetual conservation easement to preserve and protect the existing mature trees. A portion of 5235 Highwood Drive would be added the adjacent properties at 5229 Highwood Drive and 6012 Pine Grove Road and the remainder turned into the Outlot with conservation easement. There would be no new lot created. (See attached narrative and proposed plans.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. Preliminary/Final Plat to Re-Plat 5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, 6012 Pine Grove Road and create an Outlot at 5235 Highwood Drive. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Easterly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Southerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Westerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Page 194 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features 5229 Highwood Drive and 6012 Pine Grove Road contain single-family homes. The lot at 5235 Highwood Drive is vacant and heavily wooded. Planning Guide Plan designation: LD, Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District Lot Dimensions Area (existing & proposed Lot Width (existing & proposed Depth (existing & proposed Lot 1 34,450 s.f. – 37,297 s.f.90 feet 315 feet – 350 feet Lot 2 23,101 s.f. – 30,519 s.f.130 feet – 155 feet 160 feet Outlot A 19,718 s.f. – 9,453 s.f.135 feet – 75 feet 130 feet The purpose of this Plat is to establish a conservation easement over Outlot A and convey the Outlot to the City of Edina to permanently preserve the existing mature trees on the site and create an unbuildable lot. (See the attached conservation easement.) Land would be added to the two adjacent parcels to make them larger. Below are the City’s regulations regarding Outlots: Sec. 32-9. - Outlots. (a) It is the policy of the city to allow outlots on plats and subdivisions presented to the city for approval pursuant to this chapter, but only for the purpose of simplifying the descriptions of parcels of land that: (1) Would otherwise be excepted from the platted area; or (2) Are to be conveyed or dedicated to the city or other public body. (b) Therefore, any outlots shown on a plat or subdivision approved by the council shall not be, nor deemed to be, lots or parcels, as defined in chapter 36, nor shall any outlots be developed by the erection or placing of improvements on the outlots, unless first replatted into lots and blocks pursuant to this chapter and the applicable provisions of state law. Except, however, improvements may be erected or placed by the city or other public body upon outlots conveyed or dedicated to it. Page 195 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 3 Trees The applicant would be placing a conservation easement over the existing trees on the Outlot. The conservation easement would be for 99 years. (See attached easement.) Park Dedication As there is no new lot being created, and the existing lots have been platted, there is no park dedication required. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Preliminary & Final Plat 5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, 6012 Pine Grove Road. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The purpose of the request is to preserve the existing mature trees and place the Outlot in a 99-year conservation easement to be conveyed to the City of Edina. 2. The two other lots within the Plat become larger. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. The existing drainage and utility easements along the existing lot line of 6012 Pine Grove Road and 5235 Highwood be vacated. Deadline for a City Decision: February 4, 2025 Page 196 of 365 Page 197 of 365 Page 198 of 365 Page 199 of 365 Page 200 of 365 Page 201 of 365 Sites Page 202 of 365 Sites Page 203 of 365 Sites Page 204 of 365 Page 205 of 365 Page 206 of 365 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-10 VACATING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 5235 HIGHWOOD DR W and 6012 PINE GROVE RD WHEREAS, an application was received requesting that the public utility easements be vacated at 5235 Highwood Dr W and 6012 Pine Grove Rd; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on January 21, 2025, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public utility easement is not needed for public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described public utility easement is hereby vacated: That part of the drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the recorded plat of EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which falls within the south 10.00 feet of Lot 8, Block 1, EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, and which lies easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of Lot 4, Block 1, GRAYTOWER ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND The drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the recorded plat of GRAYTOWER ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which falls within the north 5.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1 said GRAYTOWER ESTATES. Except for the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. Also, Except that part which lies easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 1, EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence southerly perpendicular from the north line of said Lot 4, Block 1 to the south line of said north 5.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1 and said line there terminating. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to affect the transfer of this property. Adopted this 21st day of January, 2025. Page 207 of 365 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 2025. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Page 208 of 365 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, FOR 5229 & 5235 HIGHWOOD DRIVE AND 6012 PINE GROVE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Andrew Carter is proposing Preliminary/Final Plat to Replat three lots (5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, 6012 Pine Grove Road) for the purpose of creating an Outlot at 5235 Highwood Drive and placing it in a perpetual conservation easement to preserve and protect the existing mature trees. A portion of 5235 Highwood Drive would be added the adjacent properties at 5229 Highwood Drive and 6012 Pine Grove Road and the remainder turned into the Outlot with conservation easement. There would be no new lot created. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lot 4, Block 1, GRAYTOWER ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 8, Block 1, EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 9, Block 1, EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.03 To accommodate the request the following is required: ➢A Subdivision/Plat. 1.04 The Subject Property is guided Single Family Residential under the City’s Comprehensive Plan and is zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 1.05 On January 15, 2025 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Plat. Vote: 5 Ayes, 1 Nay and 1 abstention. 1.06 On January 21, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed subdivision/plat. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The purpose of the request is to preserve the existing mature trees and place the Outlot in a 99-year conservation easement to be conveyed to the City of Edina. 2. The two other lots within the Plat become larger. Page 209 of 365 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 Page 2 Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the proposed subdivision of 5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive, and 6012 Pine Grove Road. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing drainage and utility easements along the existing lot line of 6012 Pine Grove Road and 5235 Highwood be vacated. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on January 21, 2025. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2025. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Page 210 of 365 Page 211 of 365 Page 212 of 365 Page 213 of 365 Page 214 of 365 Page 215 of 365 CIT INA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-90 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY AND DISPENSING WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW BY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Edina is proposing to acquire certain property in the City legally described in Exhibit A ("Property") for purposes of open space; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to acquire the Property pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Purchase Agreement that is presented for City Council approval. ("Purchase Agreement") which includes a requirement that the City establish a conservation easement over the Property as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto ("Conservation Easement"); and WHEREAS, the C'ity's approval of the Purchase Agreement is contingent upon the Owner and neighboring property owners entering into a Special AssesSment Agreements in a form and terms approved by the City that reimburses the City for the cost of the acquisition of the Property; and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 462.356. subd. 2.requires that the Planning Commission review the acquisition and disposal of any publicly owned interest in real property within the City, and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 462.356, subd, 2 provides for an exception from the Planning Commission review requirement upon 2/3 vote of the governing body dispensing with the requirement and finding that the .acquisition or disposal of the property has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that: 1. The acquisition of the Property has no relationship to the City's comprehensiVe municipal plan and review by the Planning Commission of the acquisition of the Property is hereby dispensed with. 2. The acquisition of the Property and the Conservation Easement are hereby approved, subject to the recording of the Special Assessment Agreements at the time of the conveyance of the Property to the City. 3. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to execute all documents,. and take all appropriate measures to acquire the Property subject to the terms of this Resolution. 231946v2 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 Page 216 of 365 PASSED AND ADOPTED by a two-thirds vote of the City Counci Minnesota this 6th day of November, 2024. f he City of Edina, AT Jame Hovland, Mayor Sharon Allison, City Clerk 231946v2 2 Page 217 of 365 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY That part of Lot 8, Block 1, EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies north of the south 35.00 feet thereof and easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, GRAYTOWER ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence northerly along the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 4, Block I to the north line of the south 35.00 feet of said Lot 8, Block 1 and to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly to a point of intersection with the east line of the west 15.00 feet Of said Lot 8, Block 1 and the southerly right of way line of West Highwood Drive, and said line there terminating. 3 231946v2 Page 218 of 365 EXHIBIT B (reserved for recordilig) CONSERVATION EASEMENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT made this 6th day of November , 2024, by the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). WHEREAS, the City is the owner of property located in Edina, Minnesota and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Easement Premises"); and WHEREAS, the City purchased this property for public purposes with the intention of generally keeping it in its natural condition as an undeveloped wooded parcel with designated wetlands and portion of a pond; and WHEREAS, the Owners of the following described properties have entered into Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements ("Agreements") with the City related to the purchase of this property for public purposes: 5228 Highwood Drive West, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0043 5236 Highwood Drive West, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0045 5240 Highwood Drive West, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0046 5390 Highwood Drive West, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0055 6008 Pine Grove Road, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0054 6012 Pine Grove Road, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0037 6016 Pine Grove Road, Edina MN / PIN: 29-117-21-33-0038 4 231946v2 Page 219 of 365 (collectively the "Benefited Property") and; WHEREAS, as a condition of entering into the Agreements the City agreed to impose a conservation easement on the City's parcel so that it remains in a natural and generally unimproved state for the benefit of the general public. NOW THEREFORE: The City hereby creates a conservation easement for the purposes set forth in this instrument, over, under, and across the Easement Premises. This conservation easement shall remain in effect for ninety-nine (99) years from the date of execution of this document. 1. The City agrees that the following are prohibited in perpetuity on the Easement Premises: A. Designation as a public park or public place of recreation. B. Constructing, installing, or maintaining buildings and structures, other than underground storm water utilities and inlets, valves or related above ground equipment essential to the proper function and flow of storm water. C. Constructing, installing, or maintaining public recreation trails, sidewalks or vehicle roadways. D. Cutting or removing trees greater than four inches in diameter, except for tree disease control. City, at its sole discretion may remove brush, diseased or dead trees of any size, and noxious weeds. E. The deposit of solid waste, yard waste, or debris. F. Outside storage of any kind. 2. City reserve the right to enter upon the Easement Premises and to do and perform on the Easement Premises such acts as are not inconsistent with this easement. 3. City also reserves the right to use the Easement Parcel for storm water and drainage purposes. 5 231946v2 Page 220 of 365 4. The City, at its sole discretion, may install signage, fencing or other barrier around the perimeter of the Easement Parcel to discourage and prevent people from entering upon the Easement Parcel to engage in acts contrary to this easement. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 84C.03 the owners of the Benefited Property, individually and collectively, shall have a third-party right of enforcement of this Conservation Easement. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.] 6 231946v2 Page 221 of 365 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has executed this Agreem nt effective as of the day and year set forth above. CITY OF ED B • • cott H. eal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA R ~ Th foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Cp day of , 2024, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and 4-k City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal c s orari. , on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City -,,,v ATAii61\i M. ALLISON 1 Notary Public-Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2025 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 651.452.5000 7 231946v2 Page 222 of 365 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Easement Premises That part of Lot 8, Block 1, EMERALD WOODS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies north of the south 35.00 feet thereof and easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, GRAYTOWER ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence northerly along the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 4, Block 1 to the north line of the south 35.00 feet of said Lot 8, Block 1 and to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly to a point of intersection with the east line of the west 15.00 feet of said Lot 8, Block 1 and the southerly right of way line of West Highwood Drive, and said line there terminating. 8 231946v2 Page 223 of 365 CIT INA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2024-91 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City has received signed Public Improvement and Special ASSessment Agreements waiving all applicable assessment procedural requirements and .requesting to be assessed for the public improvement costs in the amount itemized therein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota; 1. Such proposed assessments, a copy of which is attached hereto and Made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments without defennent extending over a period of fifteen (15) years, the first of the installments to be payable with taxes paid in 2025 and shall bear the interest rate of three (3) percent interest per year on the unpaid balance from the date of adoption of this assessment Resolution. 3. The Owners, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the CoUnty Auditor, may pay the whole of the assessment 'on such property, to the City; and such owner may at any time thereafter, pay the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid. 4. The, City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the Cot rity, ember, 2024 by the City PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 6th day of Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. CITY OF ED an s ovland Mayor 231932v1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 Page 224 of 365 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) Ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, the undersigned, being duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council on November 6, 2024, with the original thereof on file in my office. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2024. Sharon Allison, City Clerk (SEAL) 231932v1 Page 225 of 365 ASSESSMENT ROLL PIN Owner Address Assessment 29-117-21-33-0043 Carol L. Dougliman 5228 Highwood Drive West Edina, MN 55436 $5,000.00 29-117-21-33-0045 Jeremy Exley & Jessica Exley 5236 Highwood Drive West Edina, MN 55436 $7,500.00 29-117-21-33-0046 Leonard Blum 5240 Highwood Drive West Edina, MN 55436 $50,000.00 29-117-21-33-0055 James H. Zavoral & Kathleen R. Zavoral 5239 Highwood Drive West Edina, MN 55436 $20,000.00 29-117-21-33-0054 Richard J. Nygaard & Anne M. Nygaard 6008 Pine Grove Road Edina, MN 55436 $10,000.00 29-117-21-33-0037 Andrew Carter and Jessica Carter 6012 Pine Grove Road Edina, MN 55436 $32,500.00 29-117-21-33-0038 Derek R. Scott & Christine M. Scott 6016 Pine grove Road Edina, MN 55436 $25,000.00 231932v1 Page 226 of 365 Project Report Better Together Edina Subdivision and Easement Vacation for 5229 & 5235 Highwood Drive West and 6012 Pine Grove Road Page 227 of 365 Visitors 3 Contributors 3 CONTRIBUTIONS 3 06 January 25 JeremyExley AGREES 0 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 07 January 25 Liz Olson AGREES 0 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina GUEST BOOK Public Input- 5529 and 5235 Highwood Drive West and 6012 Pine Grove Road Jeremy Exley from Fox Meadow neighborhood. We live across the street from the prop osal. We fully support re-platting the 3 lots and placing the Outlot in a perpetual conser vation easement. This is James Zavoral 5239 Highwood Drive West. Giving a positive feedback to the pu blic hearing for the plat at 5229 and 5235 Highwood Drive, and 6012 Pine Grove Road for creating an outlot at 5235 Highwood drive, and perpetual conservation easement to protect the trees and establish a habitat for a wildlife and the surrounding area. This is a very positive move. I thank the City Council and particularly Mayor Hovland for helpin g in this process. Thank you. (Voicemail transcribed by City Staff. Received 1/7/25 at 1 1:11AM) 16 January 25 Liz Olson AGREES 0 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 Hi, my name is Shelly Hall and I'm at 5509 Highwood Drive. I'm concerned about the woods that are included with this proposal for 5235 Highwood Drive. They are part of a hillside of mature oaks (which I believe wrap around and are part of what was dr. Carson's property at the end of Pine Grove Road) which adjoins my property at 5509 Highwood Drive. I'm very concerned about keeping these mature oak trees. So I just wanted to pass that along and ask you to look into whether that is an extension of that woods. Thank you. (Transcribed by City Staff. Voicemail received 1/15/25 at 7:52 PM). Page 228 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 9.1 Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Type: Resolution Department: Administration Item Title: Resolution No. 2025-13: Accepting Donations Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2025-13 accepting donations. Information/Background: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two-thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. Supporting Documentation: 1. Resolution No. 2025-13: Accepting Donations Page 229 of 365 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-13 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Senior Center •Aurora on France $250.00 Coffee for Coffee Cart Dated: January 21, 2025 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 21, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2025. Sharon Allison, City Clerk Page 230 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 9.2 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Commission Advisory Communication Department: Engineering Item Title: Transportation Commission Report on Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research and Recommendations Action Requested: Amend the Transportation Division's 2025 work plan initiative to include an analysis of traffic calming practices and the development of a guide to support more consistent implementation of approved strategies. Information/Background: As part of their 2024 work plan, the Transportation Commission completed a case study review of traffic calming programs in other cities and developed recommendations to better address traffic safety concerns. See attached advisory communication and staff report. Resources/Financial Impacts: The Transportation Division has capacity to take on this additional scope of work in 2025. It is anticipated that no additional funds will be required to complete this work. Relationship to City Policies: This initiative supports strategic objectives and goals within the Comprehensive Plan, Living Streets Plan and Climate Action Plan. Supporting Documentation: 1. Advisory Communication: Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research 2. Staff Report: Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research Page 231 of 365 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Date: January 21, 2025 To: Mayor & City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research and Recommendations Approved Work Plan Item: x Yes No Council Charge: 1: Study & Report 2: Review & Comment 3: Review & Recommend 4: Review & Decide x Items not on the approved work plan: Council action is rarely taken mid-year for items not on the current approved work plan. Action is only taken if Council chooses to discuss the Advisory Communication at the Council meeting and provides specific direction through a Council vote. Commissions are encouraged to submit new initiative proposals through the annual work plan process. Action Requested: Research has revealed actions Edina can take to slow vehicle speeds and make our city safer for pedestrians and cyclists. The Transportation Commission recommends that City Council direct City staff to: ● Continue the Drive 25 awareness campaign. Communication has been minimal since the citywide speed limit reduction in 2021. Enforcement resources are limited, so it is critical that the City consistently remind drivers of the impacts of speeding in order to influence behavior. More communication resources should be allocated to the Drive 25 campaign (i.e. deeper integration of messaging into other City events/initiatives and channels like Edition Edina, About Town, Pipeline, social media, boulevard signage), reinforcing the citywide speed limit and how important it is to stop at stop signs and yield to pedestrians. ● Pilot quick-build traffic calming solutions like those outlined below. Assess efficacy and incorporate successful measures permanently and universally through the forthcoming Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan (SEMAP). Prioritize implementation at high-risk locations in order to focus on Edina’s most vulnerable populations - seniors and youth. ● Review additional grant programs to fund implementation. See recommended list below. Primary Risk/Trade-Off: Many traffic calming solutions could make it harder to complete snow removal. According to the 2023 Quality of Life Survey (p.36), Edina residents rated snow removal much higher than the national benchmark. The Transportation Commission recognizes that traffic calming measures may make residents less satisfied with snow removal efforts. We believe this is an acceptable trade-off. Page 232 of 365 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Background: Traffic safety is the top concern the Transportation Commission hears from residents, which should come as no surprise. The City’s 2023 Quality of Life Survey respondents reinforced that speeding and stop sign violations were at least a moderate problem in their neighborhoods. The City lowered speed limits to 25 mph in 2021, but it is clear from the survey data that residents feel this change is not enough. Police are understaffed and unable to focus on traffic enforcement, and implementation of additional traffic calming measures has been limited. Common traffic calming measures include: ● Speed humps - raised areas of pavement that force drivers to slow down ● Traffic circles - small, raised islands that force drivers to slow down and make turns more carefully ● Delineator curb extensions / bump outs - extensions of the curb that narrow the roadway and make it more difficult for drivers to speed ● Pedestrian refuge islands (medians) - space in the middle of the roadway used to narrow the roadway ● Narrowed lanes - constructing roadways with 10’ wide or less travel lanes ● Feedback measures - radar / dynamic speed display signs (DSDS) to alert drivers in real time that they are speeding; traffic cameras to monitor share safe driving practices with offending drivers Page 233 of 365 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Grant Programs: In addition to Pedestrian & Cyclist Safety (PACS) funds, there are a number of grant programs that the City of Edina should pursue to fund traffic calming projects. These programs include: ● Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Active Transportation (AT) Program helps cities implement traffic calming by funding projects that support walking, biking, and other forms of active transportation. The program focuses on improving safety and accessibility through measures like adding bike lanes, pedestrian pathways, improved crosswalks, and traffic calming infrastructure such as speed humps or narrowed streets. These projects enhance the overall safety and connectivity for non- motorized users, making city streets safer and more livable for all residents. Grant applications will open 11/4/2024 and close 1/17/2025. ● The Transportation Alternatives (TA) grant program, administered by MnDOT, provides federal funding for projects like pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, Safe Routes to School, and traffic calming measures. This grant supports non-motorized transportation and safety improvements, making it ideal for traffic calming efforts. ● The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) can help cities implement traffic calming measures by providing funding for projects that reduce traffic speeds and improve safety. This includes upgrades such as road diets, speed humps, roundabouts, improved pedestrian crossings, and better signage. These data-driven projects focus on reducing crashes and enhancing safety for all road users, including pedestrians and cyclists, making them ideal for traffic calming initiatives in urban settings. ● MnDOT’s Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program offers planning assistance, infrastructure grants, and implementation funding to improve safety around schools. Cities can use this funding for traffic calming projects near school zones, including crosswalk improvements and speed reduction strategies. ● Minnesota’s Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) helps cities fund construction and improvement of local roads, including safety enhancements like road diets, roundabouts, or pedestrian safety infrastructure that are often part of traffic calming projects. ● Funded by the Minnesota Department of Health, Statewide Health Improvement Partnership (SHIP) grants support local initiatives that promote active living and community health. Cities can apply for funding to support traffic calming measures that encourage walking and biking, which align with SHIP’s goals. ● Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A), managed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, offers grants to prevent roadway fatalities and injuries. This program funds planning, infrastructure, and safety projects to enhance road safety for all users. Eligible projects include roundabouts, speed management measures, and improved pedestrian crossings, focusing on reducing crash risks and creating safer routes for all. ● The Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program, administered in Minnesota by MnDOT, supports projects that reduce traffic congestion and improve air Page 234 of 365 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 quality. Traffic calming projects that aim to reduce vehicle speed or promote alternate transportation modes could be eligible. ● Managed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funds can be used for infrastructure improvements, including traffic calming, particularly in low- and moderate-income areas. Next Steps: The Transportation Commission recommends that City Council direct City staff to deliver a plan to action on these recommendations. The plan should include: ● Solicitation public input and educate the community ● Developing a prioritized list of quick-build traffic calming pilot projects ● Identifying funding sources for project implementation The Transportation Commission believes these actions will support safe streets for all - in line with Edina’s Strong Foundation and Livable City goals. Page 235 of 365 January 21, 2025 Mayor and City Council Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Transportation Commission Report on Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research and Recommendations Background The Engineering Department oversees the City’s infrastructure planning, design and construction. Staff ensures that projects meet design standards and engineering requirements, prioritizing safety and functionality. This work ensures the City’s infrastructure meets community needs now and in the future. The City has three primarily approaches for implementing traffic safety improvements: 1. Capital improvement projects including roadway reconstruction, sidewalk and bikeway construction, and pavement maintenance. 2. Traffic Safety requests submitted to City staff. 3. Petitions submitted to City Council. Improvements are guided by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD), the City’s local traffic management policies (including the On-Street Parking Control Policy and Pedestrian Crossing Policy), and City staff’s technical judgement. Transportation Commission Recommendation As part of their 2024 work plan, the Transportation Commission completed a case study review of traffic calming programs in other cities and developed recommendations to better address traffic safety concerns. The Commission’s recommendations included: • Continue the Drive 25 awareness campaign; • Pilot quick-build traffic calming solutions and assess efficacy; and • Review additional grant programs to fund implementation. Page 236 of 365 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Strategic Objectives Improving traffic safety supports several of the City’s strategic objectives and goals: • Comprehensive Plan o Goal 13: Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadways. o Goal 14: Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. • Living Streets Plan o Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. o Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. o Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public. • Climate Action Plan o Transportation and Land Use Action 1-1: Revise street design standards and prioritize funding to align with Vision Zero strategies to create safe streets for people walking, biking, micro-mobility options, and riding transit while also accommodating vehicles. Existing Conditions The City is fortunate to have a history of relatively few traffic fatalities and serious injuries. No fatalities have occurred on local streets in the last 20 years. In the last 10 years, 29 serious injuries occurred on state highways or county roads, while 21 occurred on local streets. However, as the Quality of Life survey results indicate, traffic safety is still a significant issue among Edina residents. The City has implemented traffic calming strategies in the past, but with varying degrees of regularity. Strategies most commonly used include narrowing travel lanes and reducing speed limits on local roads. Other infrequent strategies include curb extensions, traffic circles, pedestrian refuge islands and chicanes. Strategies that have not been implemented in Edina include delineators and speed bumps; these have generally not been recommended by staff due to their impact to snowplowing operations. Adjacent communities, including Richfield and Minneapolis, have used delineators and speed bumps. Staff Recommendation The Engineering Department’s Transportation Division has an initiative on its 2025 work plan to “review existing local traffic management policies for consistency with industry best practices and City goals.” Staff recommends that the scope of this initiative be expanded to include an analysis of traffic calming practices and the development of a guide to support more consistent implementation of approved strategies. This work would be reviewed by the Traffic Safety Committee and the Transportation Commission before being presented to City Council. Page 237 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 9.3 Prepared By: Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Community Development Item Title: Sketch Plan Review for 5100 Eden Avenue Action Requested: Provide non-binding feedback to the applicant regarding the proposed sketch plan at 5100 Eden Avenue. Information/Background: The Opus Group is proposing to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot, four-story office building, which was built in 1968, and construct a new 112,000 square foot, five-story office building that would potentially include retail space on the ground floor. Opus intends to occupy a portion of the building, which would serve as its corporate headquarters, moving from their current location in Minnetonka. The plan replaces the previous proposal for a 136-unit apartment building and retail space that received preliminary PUD approval in 2023. To accommodate the request, the following would be required: • A rezoning from POD-1 to PCD-2 or PUD to allow the possibility of retail on the first floor. • Variances or flexibility through a PUD from the following standards: 1. Building height 2. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 3. Building setbacks • Site Plan and Subdivision/Replat. 1. The subject site is made up of seven small parcels all held in common ownership. The proposal is to simply combine all the lots into one. Additional requests may be necessary depending on final plans. As with all sketch plan reviews, the City Council is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Discussion should focus primarily on the compatibility of the rezoning request with the City’s guiding documents (Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Development Framework) and feedback regarding any variances from the zoning regulations. View Full Comprehensive Plan Resources/Financial Impacts: There is no direct financial impact as a result of this project. Relationship to City Policies: The Comprehensive Plan and Grandview District Development Framework are the primary guiding documents related to land use decisions in this area. Page 238 of 365 Supporting Documentation: 1. Staff Report 2. Staff Presentation 3. Applicant Submittal 4. Comprehensive Plan Design Guidelines and Land Use Goals 5. Grandview Development Framework Page 239 of 365 The Opus Group is requesting non-binding feedback for a sketch plan proposal at 5100 Eden Avenue. The proposal is to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot, four-story office building, which was built in 1968. Opus proposes to build a new 112,000 square foot, five-story office building that would potentially include retail space on the ground floor. Opus intends to occupy a portion of the building, which would serve as its corporate headquarters, moving from their current location in Minnetonka. The plan replaces the previous proposal for a 136-unit apartment building and retail space that received preliminary PUD approval in 2023. To accommodate the request, the following would be required: ➢ A rezoning from POD-1 to PCD-2 or PUD to allow the possibility of retail on the first floor. ➢ Variances or flexibility through a PUD from the following standards o Building height o Floor Area Ratio (FAR) o Building/parking setbacks ➢ Site Plan and Subdivision/Replat. o The subject site is made up of seven small parcels all held in common ownership. The proposal is to simply combine all the lots into one. Additional requests may be necessary depending on final plans. As with all sketch plan reviews, the City Council is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Discussion should focus primarily on the compatibility of the rezoning request with the City’s guiding documents (Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Development Framework) and feedback regarding any variances from the zoning regulations. January 21, 2025 City Council Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Sketch Plan Review– 5100 Eden Avenue Information / Background: Page 240 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 2 The table on page 7 of this report demonstrates how the proposed new building would compare to the standards in POD-1, PCD-2 as well as the previously approved PUD for the 136 unit apartment building. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Roadway exit ramp; The Hilltop restaurant; zoned PCD-2, Planned Commercial District and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Easterly: Highway 100. Southerly: Our Lady of Grace; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Public/Semi Public. Westerly: Vacant city owned property; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.36 acres in size and contains an existing office building and surface parking. Future Land Use and Zoning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Zoning: POD-1, Planned Office District ISSUES / CONSIDERATIONS Rezoning to PCD-2 vs. PUD To allow for the potential for retail on the ground floor, a rezoning to either PCD-2 or PUD would be required, as retail is not a permitted use in POD-1. The City Council should provide feedback on whether it would be more appropriate to pursue a rezoning to PCD-2 with variances or a PUD. Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the commission may recommend approval by the council of a rezoning based upon, but not limited to the following factors: 1. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 2. Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; 3. Will not result in an overly intensive land use; 4. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; 5. Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and 6. Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Page 241 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 3 If a request is made to rezone the property to PCD-2, at a minimum, variances would be needed for building height, floor area ratio, and building setbacks. Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. If a request is made to rezone the property to PUD, flexibility can be granted from the zoning standards; however, Section 36-253 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: 1. Provide for the establishment of planned unit development (PUD) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan; 2. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the city; 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the city’s standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian-oriented design and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; 4. Ensure high quality design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; 5. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; 6. Preserve and enhance site characteristics, including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views and screening; 7. Allow for mixing of land uses within a development; 8. Encourage a variety of housing types, including affordable housing; and 9. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Page 242 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 4 Comprehensive Plan Guidance The site is guided Mixed-Use Center in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation applies to two areas within the City – Grandview and 50th & France. Office and retail are considered primary uses within this designation. The table below provides further development guidance. The Land Use Chapter also includes the following relevant goals: Land Use Goal 1: Encourage infill and redevelopment that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. 1. Endeavor to accommodate private redevelopment in targeted potential areas of change, consistent with future land use guidance. 2. In reviewing development proposals, examine how land use and transportation are integrated to ensure that new development and redevelopment expand nonmotorized travel options that reduce the need for automobile travel. Land Use Goal 5: Support and enhance commercial and mixed-use areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. 1. Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region. 2. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. Page 243 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 5 Land Use Goal 6: Ensure that the public realm design respects community character, supports commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan includes community design guidelines intended to help the City achieve its vision. These guidelines are attached. Although detailed architectural plans have not been provided, the sketch plan appears to deliver on several key guidelines, including: • Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings rather than between buildings and the street. • Encourage successful mixed-use development – As shown in the future land use section of this chapter, many of Edina’s commercial, office and industrial districts are evolving towards a greater degree of mixed-use. The land use plan encourages this evolution by defining land use categories that encourage combinations of compatible uses. Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) Page 244 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 6 Grandview Development Framework The Grandview Development Framework was completed in 2012 and is part of the Comprehensive Plan. The full document is attached for reference. It provides a vision and general guidance on change in the Grandview District. The site is guided mixed-use center where a combination of neighborhood commercial, office and medium- to high-density residential is envisioned. Page 14 offers the following on land use: The future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. The plan emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/Highway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and office buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fields, a significant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district. Both the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Development Framework place an emphasis on creating a vibrant and walkable mixed-use district within Grandview. As noted later in this report, the site is in close proximity to transit with 7-day/week service and significant regional connections. It provides parking that is mostly screened and underground, which enhances the aesthetics of the district and makes efficient use of land and infrastructure. It would deliver on the goal of providing vertical mixed-use if retail/commercial is included on the ground floor, as well as structured parking, and having the height of the building step down near the intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue. Opus estimates that the building would be occupied by about 300 employees on a daily basis. The presence of 300 people (likely with well-paying jobs) into the district during the daytime hours would contribute to the vibrancy and economic health of the area. Workers of the office building would be within walking distance of numerous businesses and institutions including but not limited to Caribou, City Hall, Davanni’s, Edina Library, Edina Liquor, Grandview Tire & Auto, The Hilltop, Jerry’s, Starbucks, Starling, UPS, Walgreens, Wells Fargo, and potentially a future restaurant at the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue. There are also hundreds of housing units within walking distance to the site. Opus is a company with a national presence, with other offices in Austin, Chicago, Denver, Des Moines, Indianapolis, Kansas City, and Phoenix. Opus has indicated that this site would serve as its corporate headquarters, furthering Edina’s strong reputation as a desirable location for business. In addition, the project would result in a significant financial investment into the property and enhance the tax base. Page 245 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 7 Compliance Table POD-1 PCD-2 PUD (Previous Proposal) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – Arcadia Avenue Side street - Eden Avenue Side street – North Side street – East 75 ft (Building Height) 75 ft (Building Height) 75 ft (Building Height) 75 ft (Building Height) 35 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet* (45 feet to curb) 10 feet* & 34 feet 10 feet* 12 feet* 18 feet* 3 feet (30 feet to curb)* 6 feet* 15.5 feet* Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Four Stories and 48 feet Seven Stories & 82 feet* Five Stories & 75 feet* Building Coverage Floor Area Ratio 30% .5 N/A 1.5 68%* 3.2* TBD 1.76 Parking Stalls Office – 1/300 s.f Retail – Not permitted Office – 1/350 s.f. = 282.6 stalls Retail – 1/250 s.f. = 27.6 stalls (10% reduction due to proximity to transit) Total = 280 stalls 165 spaces 300 First floor building height 20 feet 20 feet 13 feet* TBD Proximity to R-1 used for residential purposes Twice the building height – 328 feet Twice the building height – 150 feet 800+ feet 800+ feet Building material First floor transparency Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. 75% transparency on first level facing the public realm. Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. 75% transparency on first level facing the public realm. Per the plans. Brick 60 feet tall on corners and base* 75% Commercial and 35% residential TBD TBD *Requires variance or flexibility through a PUD Ordinance Page 246 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 8 Site Circulation/Traffic The site would continue to have vehicular access from Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue as it does today. The applicant indicates that the Arcadia access will function as the primary drop-off point and provide access to the lobby and ground-level amenities while the Eden access will be used for both parking access and service vehicles, with access to loading and trash areas. The site is located in close proximity to on/off ramps for Highway 100, minimizing traffic on local roadways. An update to the traffic study will be required. For pedestrian access, the sketch plan indicates that 10-foot sidewalks would be provided along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. The sidewalk is currently 8 feet along Eden and tapers from 8 to 6 feet along Arcadia. Transit The site is located within a quarter mile of transit stops for Metro Transit Bus Route 46, which provides connections to other regionally significant transit routes, including the future E-Line BRT, Orange Line BRT, D-Line BRT, and Blue Line LRT. Route 46 provides transit service 7-days per week, including weekdays (6:25am – 10:13pm about every half-hour) and weekends (7:45am – 10:15pm (about every half-hour to an hour). Parking The proposed building contains approximately 98,918 square feet of gross floor area for office and 6,914 square feet of gross floor area for retail space. For office, the code requires one space per 350 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock, but no more than one space per 200 square feet. For retail, at least one space per 250 square feet is required. This results in a total parking requirement of 311 stalls; however, the reductions below would allow for at least a ten percent reduction in the total parking, which would result in a parking requirement of 280 stalls. The sketch plan indicates a total of 300 stalls and the applicant has stated they intend to comply with the City’s parking requirements. A traffic and parking study would also be completed as part of a formal application. Reductions Sec. 36-1324 lists reductions for off-street parking requirements that may be utilized jointly or separately except as indicated otherwise: • Transit - The required number of spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent if the building is located within one-quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop; to qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. • Bicycle Parking – A ten percent reduction in parking may be approved by the City Planner or the City planner’s designee provided that one of the following conditions are met: o If a retail or service use: one covered, long-term bicycle parking space per 5,000 square feet of retail or service uses. ▪ In order to qualify for this reduction, the long term bicycle parking must: Page 247 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 9 • Be protected from weather and from access by unauthorized persons; • Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that they cannot be easily removed; and • Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an upright position using a standard U-lock. o 1 short-term bike space per 5,000 square feet of retail/service uses. The sketch plan submittal indicates that an enclosed bike room will be included. It has not been specified how many bikes the room can accommodate. Landscaping Section 36-1438 states that all open areas of a lot which are not used and improved for required parking areas, drives or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and ground cover materials 1. Minimum number of overstory trees. The number of overstory trees on the lot or tract shall be not less than the perimeter of the lot or tract as measured in feet divided by 40. 2. In addition to the required number of overstory trees, a full complement of understory trees and shrubs shall be provided to complete a quality landscape treatment of the site. Based on the perimeter of the site, 24 overstory trees would be required. Specific landscaping has not been proposed. Building Design/Building Material Specific building materials have not been proposed. Per Section 36-618, (11), the following is required. a. All new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). c. No building facade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. d. First floors must have a minimum ceiling height of 20 feet. e. Exceptions may be made to a-d above for an affordable housing project that has over 50 percent of the units considered affordable housing as defined in section 36-612(1). f. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of the same materials as the original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. Mechanical Equipment The plans show a rooftop “mechanical penthouse”. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location Page 248 of 365 STAFF REPORT Page 10 of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Signage Signage allowed in the PCD-2 district is as follows per Section 36-1714 of the Zoning Ordinance: Maximum Wall Sign Area Maximum Number Freestanding Signs Maximum Area for Freestanding Signs Maximum Height 15% of wall area One per building 80 square feet 8 feet Open Space The sketch plan shows a corner pocket park near the intersection of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. The narrative states “a vibrant pocket park with lush green spaces will provide a welcoming environment for pedestrians and the public. The terraced landscape will cascade southward, integrating the approximately 16-foot grade change into the multi-level outdoor space.” Additional detail on the design of this space would be needed to show how the public would be invited to use the space. Page 249 of 365 EdinaMN.gov Sketch Plan Review 5100 Eden Avenue Page 250 of 365 Page 251 of 365 Looking southeast Looking south on Arcadia Ave Page 252 of 365 Looking northwest Looking southwest on Eden Avenue Page 253 of 365 Zoning Page 254 of 365 Zoning Page 255 of 365 Comprehensive Plan – Future Land Use Site Page 256 of 365 Grandview District Development Framework Page 257 of 365 Grandview District Development Framework Page 258 of 365 Grandview District Transportation Study Page 259 of 365 Page 260 of 365 Page 261 of 365 Page 262 of 365 Page 263 of 365 Page 264 of 365 Page 265 of 365 The request likely requires the following: Rezoning from POD-1 to PCD-2 or PUD Variances or flexibility through a PUD from the following standards: Building height Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Building/parking setbacks Subdivision/Replat Site Plan Review *Additional requests may be necessary depending on final plans Page 266 of 365 Pyramid of Discretion Page 267 of 365 Page 268 of 365 Page 269 of 365 Maison Green – 4917 Eden Ave 7 stories / FAR 2.5 Avidor – 5220 Eden Ave 6 stories / 2.2 FAR Former Public Works Site - 5146 Eden Ave 6½ stories / FAR 3.1 Vernon Terrace – 5250 Vernon Ave 5 stories Eden 100 (previous proposal) - 5100 Eden Ave 7 stories / 3.2 FAR Grandview Developments – Completed or Approved Jerry’s Office Building- 5101 Vernon 5 stories Page 270 of 365 Site Page 271 of 365 Questions Page 272 of 365 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Project Overview and Design Narrative Project Introduction Opus is pleased to share our sketch plan submittal with the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council. The package includes visioning and conceptual design for the exciting new redevelopment opportunity at 5100 Eden Avenue. The proposed project will play a major role in the City’s future goals for the Grandview neighborhood. Opus is proposing a 138-unit multifamily project that activates the boulevard along Arcadia Avenue and maximizes the site’s full potential. In addition to providing luxury homes for future residents, the project will feature a class A amenity package with indoor parking, a bike valet, fitness, a work from home area and an expansive outdoor amenity space complete with a spa. Along with the building amenities for residents to enjoy, the public will benefit from the improved connection along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. The building frontage along Arcadia Avenue will feature an improved drive lane, new parallel parking stalls, a grassy boulevard, and a new and improved sidewalk for patrons. The newly constructed sidewalk will connect the neighborhood to nearby amenities in what is now an underutilized pedestrian area. Our team thoughtfully designed the building’s presence along this prominent avenue to synergize with the Grandview Project at 5146 Eden Avenue. The pedestrian experience along Eden Avenue will also be improved with lush, terraced landscaping between the sidewalk and the building. This site is an important puzzle piece to the overall goals for the Grandview District and we are excited to share our team’s vision. Site Overview 5100 Eden Avenue is made up of seven adjacent parcels totaling 1.38 acres on the northeast quadrant of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There is an existing 38,678 SF office building on the site that was built in 1968. The current tenants are on short term leases or include rights to remove with notice. Office space is not as desirable as it once was, and the existing building is not in alignment with the City’s vision for the site. The site is currently zoned Planned Office District-1 and will seek to be rezoned as a Planned Unit Development to allow the project to maximize its full potential. Development Data The proposed building will be seven stories in height, with the lowest level only partially exposed along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There are two levels of enclosed parking in a precast structure containing a total of 171 parking stalls, and five stories of wood frame construction above. There will be three access points, with one being off Eden Avenue and two off Arcadia Avenue. The main entrance will be off Arcadia Avenue and will have four visitor parking stalls alongside a generous green space lawn to create a welcoming environment for the project within the neighborhood. The total building will be approximately 244,000 gross square feet and will feature 138 dwelling units with 10% of the units affordable for households earning 50% of the Area Median Income. The project will consist of a full amenity package, thoughtfully designed for the desires of future residents. An active lobby along Arcadia Avenue will have work from home spaces, a fitness space, and yoga room. There will also be a bike valet along with a dog wash and dog run. A second story amenity deck will have a spa, a turf area, and a grill area with seating. The sixth-floor amenity deck will provide additional space for resident enjoyment with dynamic views to City Hall and downtown Minneapolis. The site has approximately 16 feet of grade change from the Northwest corner to the Southwest corner, making this a challenging site. Opus has worked hard to mitigate these challenges and provide a vibrant project that responds to the district goals, the pedestrian experience, and the site forces, all the while maintaining a viable project. The exterior design will feature high class building materials such as high quality masonry, architectural wall cladding, architectural metal panels, generous glass, and plentiful balconies, all within a building form that respects and responds to the neighborhood. The building opens up toward Arcadia Avenue with an expansive front entry and exterior amenity package providing an enhanced pedestrian experience. The relief provided along this street responds well to the proposed development at the old Public Works site, and the two developments will provide a much-needed enhancement to Arcadia Avenue. The corners of the building anchor the structure to the site, but the design thoughtfully pulls back the mass in the middle. This is evident especially along Arcadia Avenue but also along Eden Avenue. The step-backs provide visual interest and relief for the public as they walk or drive by the site. Lush landscaping and terraced walls relieve some of the challenging topography, adding to the pedestrian experience. In addition, programming has been thoughtfully placed to activate the streetscape. Sustainability is a core tenant of Opus’s mission statement and will be incorporated into the design and execution of the project at every step. We intend to meet or exceed the requirements put forth by the city. Because of the small site size and healthy slope present, the development team is asking for relief on setbacks and height. Our goal is to work with the city on crafting a PUD that allows the project to move forward with the intent shown herein. Summary Opus is excited for the opportunity to be a part of the community’s overall vision for the Grandview neighborhood. In collaboration with our consultants and feedback from City staff, we believe the following package encapsulates the community’s desired outcome for the site. We look forward to working alongside the City of Edina and its stakeholders to drive this vision forward and build upon the city’s goals for this growing neighborhood. Project Overview and Narrative 5100 Eden Avenue - Speculative Multi-Tenant Office Development Project Overview & Design Narrative 5100 Eden Avenue - Office Development Edina, MN 1-2-2025 Page 273 of 365 12 | 27 | 2024 5100 EDEN AVENUE EDINA MN SKETCH PLAN | DECEMBER 2024 Page 274 of 365 12 | 27 | 2024 01 SITE PLAN 6,914 SF OFFICE / COMMERCIAL DROP-OFF ARCADIA AVE100 FRONTAGE ROAD 1 0 0 F R O N T A G E R O A D 1,376 SF TRASH / SERVICE 29,490 SF PARKING TERRACE 304 SF ELEC 3,595 SF LOBBY 26' - 0" 24' - 0" BUILDING SERVICESBREEZEWAY BIKE ROOM 14%27' - 6"24' - 0"24' - 0"EDEN AVE Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue 12/11/2024 Level 01Edina, MN BUILDING SUMMARY • 2 LEVELS BELOW GRADE (PARKING) • 5 LEVELS ABOVE GRADE (≈ 75’) • ≈ 112,000 RSF (OFFICE / COMMERCIAL) • ≈ 7,250 SF AMENITY SPACE • ≈ 300 PARKING STALLS • LEVEL 1 ACTIVE USE ON EDEN/ARCADIA • ≈ 4,250 SF CORNER POCKET PARK • TERRACED LANDSCAPING • WIDENED PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS 10’ 0” SIDEWALKS CORNER POCKET PARK ACTIVE USES ON CORNER TERRACED LANDSCAPING VEHICULAR ACCESS VEHICULAR ACCESS Page 275 of 365 12 | 27 | 2024 02 MASSING VEHICULAR ACCESS CORNER POCKET PARK GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE AMENITY TERRACE 10’ SIDEWALKS TENANT SIGNAGE A B C D E F AA C D E C B F Page 276 of 365 12 | 27 | 2024 LEVEL P2LEVEL P1 03 BELOW GRADE PARKING FLOORS 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 E F G 45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"45' - 0"28' - 0"18' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" 42,789 SF PARKING FRESH AIR INTAKE (SIDE WALL) 9 7%14%116 STALLS PLAN NORTH Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue Level P1 12/11/2024 Edina, MN 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 E F G 42,789 SF PARKING FRESH AIR INTAKE (FROM ABOVE) 9 14%118 STALLS45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"45' - 0"28' - 0"18' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" PLAN NORTH Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue Level P2 12/11/2024 Edina, MN Page 277 of 365 12 | 27 | 2024 04 LEVEL 02 & 03 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 E F G 1,566 SF SERVICE 2,143 SF SERVICE 9,644 SF OFFICE ROOF 2,534 SF TERRACE STAIR TRANSFEROPEN TO BELOW 9 10,743 SF OFFICE 2,456 SF AMENITY IDF ELECWC WC45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"45' - 0"28' - 0"18' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" PLAN NORTH Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue Level 02 12/11/2024 Edina, MN 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 24,160 SF OFFICE 1,575 SF SERVICE 688 SF SERVICE1' - 10"45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"1' - 10"9 15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" IDF ELECWC WC PLAN NORTH Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue Level 03 - Level 05 12/11/2024 Edina, MN Page 278 of 365 12 | 27 | 2024 05 LEVEL 04 & 05 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 24,160 SF OFFICE 1,575 SF SERVICE 688 SF SERVICE1' - 10"45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"1' - 10"9 15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" IDF ELECWC WC PLAN NORTH Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue Level 03 - Level 05 12/11/2024 Edina, MN 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 24,160 SF OFFICE 1,575 SF SERVICE 688 SF SERVICE1' - 10"45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"1' - 10"9 15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" IDF ELECWC WC PLAN NORTH Scale:1/32" = 1'-0" 5100 Eden Avenue Level 03 - Level 05 12/11/2024 Edina, MN Page 279 of 365 ROOF BELOWROOF BELOWMECHANICAL PENTHOUSE HIGH ROOF6' - 1"15' - 2"123' - 8"18' - 3"3' - 2"19' - 9"34' - 1"77' - 2" 90' - 6"30' - 3"34' - 7"ARCADIA AVEHWY 100 FRONTAGE ROADEDEN AVEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE18' - 2" 213' - 8" 15' - 5"38' - 9"PLAN NORTHScale:1" = 40'-0"5100 Eden AvenueDIMENSIONED SITE PLAN2/27/2024Edina, MNPage 280 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-39 Community Design Guidelines In order for Edina to remain economically competitive, attractive to residents, businesses, and visitors, and sustainable, the community must be more than functionally responsive. Edina must also be beautiful, vibrant, safe, inclusive, and promote active living. The principles and guidelines in this chapter are intended to help the City achieve this vision by focusing on the design of the built environment and the natural environment. The community design principles apply to both City actions and private sector development. The City is responsible for designing, maintaining and improving its streets, parks, public buildings and other public spaces. The private sector is encouraged to design buildings, structures and landscape features that complement and support the public realm and fit within the context of the surrounding neighborhoods or districts. This section provides principles and guidelines for buildings, site design, and interconnecting spaces. The 2008 comprehensive plan also included guidance for citywide movement patterns and public spaces. This has subsequently been replaced by the Living Streets Plan (2015). Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Plan defines Edina's vision for living streets and addresses how the vision is implemented by providing information on street design, traffic calming, bike facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design process. See the Transportation Chapter for additional information on how the Living Streets Plan is incorporated in the comprehensive plan. As a largely developed city, Edina’s future growth will be built on infill and redevelopment sites and will need to fit in, improving the character of surrounding areas. The small area plans provide more detailed guidance for specific redevelopment areas of the city. The following overall principles, focused primarily on aesthetic issues, provide general guidance when redevelopment occurs. Principles 1. Design buildings with an interesting and varied pedestrian-scaled street frontage, as expressed through building massing, façade articulation, materials, and details. 2. Recognize that diverse architectural styles can be employed to achieve city-building goals. 3. -Position buildings to fit with their existing and/or planned context by facing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. 4. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. 5. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. Buildings should have an interesting and varied pedestrian-scaled street frontage, with parking located to the rear when possible. Page 281 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-40 Guidelines: Low-Density Design (Residential) 1. Control the scale and massing of infill housing to make it reasonably compatible with established residences. Recent zoning changes have partially addressed this issue. Future zoning changes should refer to and consider the small area plans discussed earlier in this chapter. Other techniques that may be considered include: • a graduated scale, or floor area ratio that relates building size to lot size; • an impervious surface maximum to ensure that a reasonable percentage of each lot remains as green space, for aesthetics and stormwater management; • design standards that guide the stepping back of building mass and height from adjacent residential buildings and parks. 2. Building and garage placement. Many neighborhoods and individual blocks have an established pattern of building placement, spacing, landscape treatments, front yard setbacks and garage placement that combine to convey a particular neighborhood character. For example, most garages in the city’s older traditional neighborhoods are detached and located within the rear yard. While new construction is likely to vary from this pattern, some limits on the degree of variation may be appropriate in areas such as historic districts. For example, the following guidelines should be considered: • The width of front-loaded garages is limited so that they occupy no more than a defined percentage of the front façade; • Driveway width at the curb is limited; • Front-loaded garages may be required to meet the same setback as the rest of the front façade. 3. Integration of multi-unit housing into transitional areas. In the past, duplexes were located along many major thoroughfares in Edina as a kind of buffer or transition to the adjacent single-family housing. Today this housing type is in need of updating or replacement in many locations, and high land and redevelopment costs create pressure for higher-density housing types. Townhouse complexes have been constructed in locations such as north France Avenue. The challenge is that in many locations the duplexes Infill housing can be scaled to be compatible with the neighborhood context. Parking located to the rear of a property creates a more pedestrian friendly street frontage. Multifamily housing can be scaled to be compatible with lower density neighborhoods. Page 282 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-41 are only one lot deep, which makes it difficult to provide an adequate transition to single-family scale. The following sections broadly address the issue of integrating multi-unit housing into lower-density, primarily single-family neighborhood transitional areas. 4. Single-family characteristics. Attached and multifamily housing should emulate single-family housing in its basic architectural elements – pitched roofs, articulated facades, visible entrances, porches or balconies. Taller buildings should step down to provide a height transition to existing adjacent residential buildings. 5. Level of formality. Design the front and back facades with appropriate levels of formality. The front, as the more public side of the house, will receive the more formal treatment, with the main entrance, porch or steps and landscaping, while trash/recycling storage, play equipment and outdoor storage should be located in the back. 6. Parking to the rear. Where rear-loaded or detached garages predominate, parking spaces and garages should be located to the rear of the lot or interior of the block. If this is infeasible, garages should be recessed some distance behind the main façade of the house and surface parking should be placed within side yards to the extent feasible. 7. Mechanical systems on all buildings should be positioned so they are not visible from the public view, unless they are an integral part of the architectural design (i.e. photovoltaic roof tiles). Solar panels, satellite dishes and air conditioning systems should be positioned to the back or side yard of the house or screened by plantings or low walls. 8. Garages and outbuildings should be designed in character with the primary residence on the site. When placed on an alley or lane, the design should contain windows that provide a view to the lane, for additional security. When attached, the garage elevation should not dominate the street elevation of the primary residence. Parking to the rear can create attractive pedestrian oriented environments. Multifamily housing can emulate architectural elements of neighborhood context. Page 283 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-42 Guidelines: Medium- and High-Density Design (All Uses) 1. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. a. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. Permeable hardscape, where appropriate, may be preferred over blacktop or traditional paving. Vertical “living walls” (trellis, vine-covered fences) are preferable to materials that absorb and reflect heat. b. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. c. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. d. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. e. Design surface parking to maximize stormwater infiltration and allow for groundwater recharge, using infiltration swales, pervious pavement or similar techniques. f. Where vehicle parking requirements exist, implement minimum bicycle parking standards as well. g. Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change. h. Enhance the appearance of parking ramps by designing the structure with the possibility of the addition of liner buildings when development opportunities are ripe. i. Use striping, curbs and landscape treatments, centralized walkway medians and islands, and textured paving to clearly define walking spaces within parking areas and adjacent to vehicular circulation. j. Use raised crossings, speed humps, and speed tables to discourage high traffic speeds in parking lots where pedestrian volumes are high. k. Locate and screen service and loading areas to minimize their visibility from public streets and adjacent residential areas. Visual screening and permeable pavers can create a more attractive, sustainable treatment for surface parking. Particularly in medium to high density areas, structured parking and shared parking support efficient use of land and increased walkability. Page 284 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-43 2. Encourage Successful Mixed-use Development. As shown in the future land use section of this chapter, many of Edina’s commercial, office and industrial districts are evolving towards a greater degree of mixed-use. The land use plan encourages this evolution by defining land use categories that encourage combinations of compatible uses. Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses. The City of Edina has several examples of successful mixed-use developments, most notably the 100-acre Centennial Lakes area and the 24-acre Edinborough project. Additionally, there are opportunities to encourage mixed use in areas such as 50th & France, 44th & France, and Wooddale Valley View. The following guidelines are directed toward creating successful mixed- use environments. 3. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. • Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. In some cases, much higher window coverage may be appropriate. Mixed use development can provide an amenity for area residents and support multimodal transportation alternatives. A consistent street wall can provide an enhanced pedestrian environment, particularly in commercial and mixed use areas. Page 285 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-44 4. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. • Encourage enhanced transit stops, including shelters, shade and seating where feasible. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.). 5. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed-use developments often produce an internal capture rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed-use development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities this type of development offers. In the long term other factors will be impacting parking demand, such as the availability of autonomous vehicles, shared cars, bike and scooter share, and other modes that provide alternatives to driving and parking a car. 6. Improve Connectivity in Large-scale Development. Internal and external connectivity. As part of redevelopment or expansion of large-scale sites, reintroduce an internal local street and pathway network that connects through the site and to suitable entry points at the perimeter. The goal is to encourage pedestrians to reach the site and drivers upon arriving to continue all further movement by foot. As a result, the capacity of internal roads can be reduced and more area devoted to amenities, providing still more incentives to walk. Bicycle facilities should allow residents in surrounding neighborhoods to bike safely to the site. Transit stops should be provided in visible and central locations. 7. “Edge” or transitional uses. Moderately sized liner buildings should be encouraged to soften the edge of large-scale superblock development. Medium-density housing types such as townhouses combined with structured parking may also be an appropriate transitional use. Adding pedestrian and bicycle amenities and facilities can encourage people to walk and bike to destinations. Mixed use development provides an opportunity for shared parking between uses. Connectivity within large developments can support walkability. Page 286 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-45 8. Provide appropriate transitions between land uses. Rather than discouraging movement between adjacent land uses with berms and fences, focus on creating elegant and attractive transitions between adjacent uses. Transitional areas include well-landscaped pedestrian walkways, seating areas, arcades, and other spaces that encourage integration rather than separation. 9. Buildings Frame the Street. Building placement and heights can serve to define the streetscape and visually reduce the apparent width of the street. Generally speaking, wider streets can accommodate taller buildings subject to the height limitations described elsewhere in this Chapter. 10. Façade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well-defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks or similar techniques. 11. Transparency and Natural Surveillance. Building forms and facades should provide an awareness of the activity within the buildings through frequent doors and windows oriented toward public streets and open space. 12. Variety of Building Forms. Encourage an integrated mix of building types, heights and footprints within blocks, rather than single buildings or building groups. 13. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks and public spaces. 14. Height. With the development of a series of small area plans as additional guidance for growth and development in Edina, the decision was made to not include guidance for building height in the main comprehensive plan document. This will allow for more flexibility in the development review process. Building height is still being addressed through the city’s zoning code and in the small area plans. Stepping down building height and scale can provide a transition to lower density areas. Buildings that frame the street and have transparent facades can provide a pedestrian- oriented experience. Varying building forms provides visual interest and aids in transitions. Page 287 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-46 Land Use Goals and Policies Land use goals and policies are provided below. See the Implementation Chapter for related implementation steps, lead implementing agencies, and estimated timelines. Goal 1: Encourage infill and redevelopment that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. 1. Endeavor to accommodate private redevelopment in targeted potential areas of change, consistent with future land use guidance. 2. In reviewing development proposals, examine how land use and transportation are integrated to ensure that new development and redevelopment expand nonmotorized travel options that reduce the need for automobile travel. 3. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods and key destinations, and with other communities, to improve multimodal transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on cars. Goal 2: Support livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community changes over time. 1. Manage transitions and seams between different use, scale, and intensity types to mitigate any negative impacts and encourage positive connections between areas where appropriate. 2. Improve the current development review and approval system to provide clearer direction as to community design goals and encourage high-quality development that is compatible with its surroundings. 3. Incorporate Edina’s tradition of leadership in education throughout the city by providing and encouraging opportunities for residents to engage and learn about the community. 4. Pursue overall goals of promoting equity and reducing disparities in outcomes for people living and working in the community. Goal 3: Grow and develop sustainably to protect the natural environment, promote energy efficiency, conserve natural resources, and minimize the impacts of buildings on the environment. 1. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. 2. Encourage efficient use of land through shared functions where appropriate, such as stormwater management incorporated as a community amenity. 3. Maintain the current open space and wetlands acreage and seek to expand it whenever possible. 4. Encourage development types that are designed to function well in all seasons, including winter. Goal 4: Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. 1. Building on current efforts, seek options that allow for residential redevelopment that is sensitive to the community character and context, while expanding options for residents. Page 288 of 365 Edina Comprehensive Plan 3. Land Use and Community Design Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 3-47 2. Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. 3. Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. 4. Investigate opportunities to accommodate Missing Middle housing within the city, defined as range of multi-unit or clustered housing types compatible in scale with single-family homes that help meet the growing demand for walkable urban living. Goal 5: Support and enhance commercial and mixed-use areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. 1. Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region. 2. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. 3. Support the development of mixed use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. Goal 6: Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 1. Ensure that the city’s roads continue to evolve to act as connectors, rather than as barriers. 2. Incorporate amenities and infrastructure into public corridors to make them beautiful, efficient, and multimodal public spaces that contribute to community identity and pride. 3. Encourage the development of living streets with enhanced public realms and integrated environmental functions, including potentially functioning as high-integrity ecologic corridors. Page 289 of 365 GrandView District Development FrameworkEdina, MinnesotaDecember 7, 2011Revised January 17, 2012Revised January 25, 2012Revised January 31, 2012Revised March 27, 2012Revised April 5, 2012Page 290 of 365 24/05/12Ken Potts Kim Melin Randy Halvorson Chris Rofi dal Steve Buss Gene Persha Richard Borland Larry Chestler Laura Giertsen Ellen Jones Terry Ahlstrum Dick Ward Bill Neuendorf Tim McIlwain Bright Dornblaser Andy Brown Suzanne Davison Greg Domke Sandy Fox Dick Crockett Arne Cook Tom Bonneville Kim Montgomery Tim Murphy Th omas RaeuchleTom RuppertPeter Sussman Lisa Diehl Bob Kojetin David Davison Bernie Beaver Mike Platteter Peyton Robb Dan Gieseke Diane Reinhart James Justice Darcy Winter Paul Nelson David Novak Linda Urban Tom Mattison Ken and Adele Floren Michael Schroeder Jim SmithKevin Staunton, ChairMichael Fischer Brett Johnson Collin Bredeson Deron Lindquist Eric Bredesen Jim BaischSteering CommitteeConsultant TeamCuningham Group Architecture, PAClose Landscape ArchitectureHR GreenCommunity Design GroupSpringsted Inc.Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 31. Hope for Change 52. Thoughts and Interactions 63. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 94. Moving Forward with a Purpose 455. Appendix 57Page 291 of 365 34/05/122. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure to:• Make the District accessible and inviting to pedestrians and cyclists;• Create connections between the diff erent parts of the District;• Maintain automobile-friendly access to convenience retail; • Create separate pathways for “pass-through” and “destination” automobile traffi c; and• Preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor in a way that ensures that the kinds of opportunities pursued in the future are consistent with the character we envision for the District and provide benefi t to the surrounding neighborhood.3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-creating changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voluntary private redevelopment consistent with the vision that improves the quality of the neighborhood for residents, businesses, and property owners. Th is Development Framework makes substantial progress in charting the path to be followed in redeveloping the GrandView District. By creating a vision that meets the seven Guiding Principles, it provides guidance to city offi cials, residents, business and property owners, and developers as opportunities for change emerge in the District. To ensure that the future redevelopment of the District is consistent with the vision articulated in this Framework, we recommend that it become part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.Executive SummaryTh e Development Framework presented here is part of a small area planning process required by Edina’s Comprehensive Plan for those parts of our community (like the GrandView District) designated as Potential Areas of Change. It follows the 2010 GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan process. Th at process – led by a group of community residents and business and property owners – resulted in adoption by the Edina City Council of seven Guiding Principles for the redevelopment of the GrandView District.Th e process of crafting this Development Framework has been led by a 52-member Steering Committee made up of residents of the community and owners of area businesses and properties. Th e 52 members of the Steering Committee have dedicated countless hours since April of 2011 listening to community members, considering options, and debating alternatives for the future of the District. Th anks to a grant from the Metropolitan Council, we have had the good fortune to be supported in our eff orts by a talented group of consulting experts. We have also been fortunate to have the patient support of City staff throughout the process.Our objective in creating this Development Framework is to build upon the seven Guiding Principles adopted by the City Council. In the pages that follow, we share a vision of how to bring those Guiding Principles to life. While there are many details essential to fulfi lling that vision, our goals can be summarized as eff orts to:1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements like:• A central commons on the Public Works site with indoor and outdoor public space that connects the civic cornerstones of the District and serves the neighborhood and community needs;• A “gateway” at Highway 100 that announces the District as a special place, using elements like an iconic pedestrian and bicycle bridge spanning Highway 100; and• An innovative, cutting-edge approach to 21st-century sustainability.Page 292 of 365 44/05/12We want to be clear, however, that we recognize that the Framework (like the Comprehensive Plan) provides broad direction rather than detailed requirements. Th is Framework is intended to be a vision of the future rather than a blueprint. Achieving the vision will require, among other things:• A feasibility study that examines the costs and resources available to bear those costs;• An examination of the height and density necessary to make the vision fi nancially feasible while ensuring that it results in the human scale and neighborhood character that is the essential to the Framework;• Developing a strategy to allow for a vibrant business and residential community by managing the mix of retail, offi ce, residential, and public uses of land while maintaining the currently successful neighborhood service and convenience character;• A determination of a range of possible housing choices that support the character and experience of the District.• A community building/public green programming group should work to determine appropriate program and uses.We discuss these and other “next steps” in the Implementation section. Consistent with the “community-led” spirit of the initial stages of this process, we recommend that these “next steps” include active participation by community members, support of staff , and leadership from the City Council. Study Area LocationPage 293 of 365 4/05/121. Hope for ChangePage 294 of 365 64/05/121. Hope for ChangeIntroductionHope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration, participation, and planning. Th ousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small) have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders, business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed offi cials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. Th e result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy, policy, and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable, memorable ways.Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010Page 295 of 365 74/05/121. Hope for Change1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development.2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business.3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area.4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-fi lled place.5. Organize parking as an eff ective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor.7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development refl ecting Edina’s innovative development heritage.The Seven Guiding PrinciplesGuiding PrinciplesPrinciples Related to the Concept Diagram1. Leverage publicly owned parcels2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents3. Turn barriers into opportunities4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive5. Organize parking; provide convenience6. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement7. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative161226374457Page 296 of 365 84/05/121. Hope for ChangeHistoryBefore Edina became a village almost 125 years ago, a country market road crossed Minnehaha Creek at Edina Mills. Headed westward to the high ground, it branched out as Eden Prairie Road and Hopkins Road. In 1869, the Yancey family moved from Ohio and purchased 127 acres of land including that high ground and most of the present GrandView District. Civil War veteran Beverly C., his wife Ellen and their seven children were to become the most prominent pioneer black family of Edina over several decades and left a legacy of civic involvement. An observer described early Edina as an agricultural village, “where there is a post offi ce, a mill, and a store, and proudly aspires to the dignity of a trading town. Th e numerous farms are well-cultivated, and are occupied by intelligent people who appreciate education, and surround themselves with the accessories of a refi ned society.”A center of the early community was Minnehaha Grange No. 398, organized in 1873. Th e Grange Hall originated in a meeting at the Yancey family home in 1879 with a “considerable number of persons desirous to form an association to build and own a hall building near Edina Mills.” In 1888, the name Edina was voted upon in that building, which also served as the village hall until 1942. When moved for construction of St. Stephen’s Church in 1935, a member of the Yancey family donated the new site. In 1970, the Grange Hall was moved to the present Frank Tupa Park in the GrandView District, later joined by the historic Cahill School.Changes in the district have been ongoing including transportation and services. Members of the Yancey family platted Grand View Heights in 1910 and Tingdale Brother’s Brookside in 1916. In 1913, the Dan Patch Line was cut through the high ground east of Brookside Avenue, providing passenger service to Minneapolis from 1915 to 1942. In 1927, new highway 169/212 (current Vernon Avenue) was cut through the District. Grading and paving businesses such as J. A. Danens and Son located to serve the growth, joined by motels and restaurants. Th e District expanded rapidly with western Edina following World War II. Th e Edina directory of 1953 listed six of ten businesses in the District as including “Grandview” in their names: a cafe, market, two service station, hardware, and seed Sources: 1. R. J. Baldwin, in Isaac Atwater, History of Minneapolis and Hennepin County (Munsell, 1895), p. 1263 as quoted in Paul D. Hesterman, From Settlement to Suburb: Th e History of Edina, Minnesota (Burgess Publishing,1998) Edina Historical Society, p. 29.2. Meeting minutes dated March 7, 1879. Copy in the Edina Historical Society fi les.Historic GrandView Heights Platand garden supply store. In 1947, Jerry Paulsen opened a meat counter in one of the local groceries, a modest beginning to Jerry’s Enterprises, a longtime prominent presence in the District.It is encouraged to look to the history of the District in naming the proposed public amenities and new streets. Th e Yancey family in particular, due to their early ownership of the District and legacy of civic engagement, merits that honor at a prominent location such as the commons. Page 297 of 365 4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsPage 298 of 365 104/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsProject Schedule and ProcessSept Oct Nov DecPart IDiscussion and DiscoveryCommunity Workshop #1Part IIIdeas and OptionsCommunity Workshop #2Part IIIDecide and DeliverCommunity Workshop #3DeliverablesProject/Community Meetings Sept Oct Nov DecSteering CommitteeStaff CoordinationExecutive Team MeetingCommunity WorkshopWork Group MeetingsPlan Commission/CouncilProject Update#1 #2 #3Part I: Discussion and DiscoveryPart I is about learning from and listening to the Steering Committee, Work Groups, and other stakeholders; analyzing the study area and understanding the work done to-date; appreciating the larger dynamics of the area; and clearly defi ning the opportunities. An initial Community Workshop is held to conduct work group discussions/downloads, and a public meeting/presentation is hosted by the Steering Committee and the Consulting Team. Part II: Ideas and OptionsPart II focuses on developing ideas and options that address the specifi c issues raised by the Steering Committee, stakeholders, and the public process. The Consulting Team conducts a three-day Community Workshop (to be held in the study area) that will include Steering Committee meetings, focus group meetings, stakeholder interviews, team work sessions, and conclude with a public meeting/presentation.Part III: Decide and DeliverPart III consolidates all the comments, ideas, and options into a preferred direction. This part includes a third Community Workshop and public meeting. The Consulting Team prepares a summary document that may be widely distributed via a variety of sources (i.e., print, web, etc.) and a Sketch-up 3D model of the area with preferred options.Project Schedule: Th e project schedule was organized around three community workshops.Page 299 of 365 11Th e Steering Committee and Executive Committee have worked closely with the Consulting Team to facilitate a process that focused on key issues, opportunities, and recommendations. Th e process worked with the Steering Committee that met on a regular basis to guide the Consulting Team. A sub-committee of Work Groups addressed Land Use/Community Design, Community Needs/Public Realm, Transportation/Infrastructure and Real Estate/Finance. Th ese groups put an incredible amount of eff ort into initial background information and research, defi nition of issues, and discussion about ideas and options. A key component of the project was a series of Community Workshops held in September, October and November, 2011, that hosted a range of community stakeholders either in interviews, focus groups, program meetings and at public meetings.Th e community participation process included these primary groups of participants: Steering Committee, Executive Committee, work groups, City staff , focus groups (land owners, neighborhoods, public offi cials, schooldistrict, institutions, city departments, business operators, and others as identifi ed during the process), Plan Commission members, City Council members and the Mayor.4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsSummary of Participation ProcessThe Public Participation Process: Th e public participation process included Steering Committee meetings, work group meetings, public meetings, focus groups meetings, and program groups meetings throughout the fall of 2011.Page 300 of 365 4/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPage 301 of 365 134/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterConcept DiagramsIntroduction Create “go to” and “stay at” uses Connect throughoutEasy to get to; easy to get aroundPrinciple #2 in the GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan is about “enhanc(ing) the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections.”Th e Guide Plan also suggests that “Th e District serves primarily as a neighborhood (rather than regional) center.” Based on Steering Committee and Public input, this idea has broad appeal. But what do we mean by neighborhood center and how does that fi t with specifi c expectations and outcomes for the GrandView District?“Neighborhood feel,” “pedestrian friendly,” and “safe and connected” describe the desired character for the District. But the basis for these words lies in a clear vision for the key elements, or systems, that defi ne place...and further set the framework for future and ongoing development at GrandView. Th ese elements include Land Use, Transportation and Movement, the Public Realm and Sustainability, and will be described and illustrated in more detail in this chapter.Neighborhood CenterPage 302 of 365 144/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and offi ce buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fi elds, a signifi cant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district.Vernon is assumed to remain more convenience-and service-oriented with improved pedestrian sidewalks/connections, safer street crossings (especially to the adjacent neighborhood), bike lanes, and better organized/managed traffi c fl ow and parking. Both Eden and Vernon are anticipated to employ Complete/Living Street principles that emphasize the place-qualities of streets.Across Highway 100 to the east, the Vernon/50th/Eden alignment culminates with City Hall; long term uses are assumed to accommodate a greater civic/community presence when/if the Highway 100 interchange is reconfi gured as a split-diamond facility.Goals• Develop and improve the district as three smaller “villages” that are connected physically and by a signature character and identity.• Recognize the need for a range of housing types and choices and address those markets that also reinforce the District vision.Land UseLand use in the District is currently focused on convenience retail and service uses that are visible from Vernon Avenue. Th e majority of these uses are auto-oriented and are accessible from Vernon and Gus Young Lane. Th e exception is the GrandView Square development that includes residential, offi ce, and civic uses organized around a central green space. Th e Comprehensive Plan identifi es the GrandView Heights District as a mixed-use center character area, a potential “area of change” and guides future land as a mixed-use center. Th e Comprehensive Plan also says that “the District is in the process of evolving from a somewhat scattered auto-oriented district to a more integrated mixed of uses.”Th e over-arching concept is to support the “go-to” uses (auto-oriented) while anticipating more “stay-at” uses (pedestrian-oriented), and to improve future use and built form around three key civic “centers”: • City Hall• Library• Community Commons (civic building and green space)Th e future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. Th e plan emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/• Emphasize the connection to Minnehaha Creek.• Create a recognized, visible arts identity and provide space/place for greater community arts users and producers.• Address needs of underserved populations (teens, singles, seniors, etc.).• Establish a community commons as a multi-purpose facility for a wide audience (e.g., whole body, whole life, health and wellness) and as a focal point and central gathering place that connects City Hall to the east with the Library to the southwest. • Celebrate the “Birthplace” of Edina, the Mill, and record the oral history of GrandView Heights; tell the stories.• Emphasize a pedestrian-oriented sense of place that produces an appropriate scale and function, and preserves surrounding views. • Support economic growth and community stability by providing accessible and effi cient connections between home, school, work, recreation, and business destinations through improved pedestrian and vehicular environments throughout the area.Page 303 of 365 154/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Land Use PlanVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use CenterOffi ceMedium/High Density ResidentialPage 304 of 365 164/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master PlanExisting BuildingsPotential DevelopmentProposed Civic Community BuildingsPage 305 of 365 174/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Potential Build-OutVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveLibraryHwy 100City HallPage 306 of 365 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking NorthPage 307 of 365 194/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic Works SiteLand UseDevelopment3.6 acres Site28,000 SF Public Green24 units Condominium42 units Apartments50,000 SF Community/Civic16 units TownhousesParking200 spaces Park and Ride200 spaces Community Use158 spaces Multi-familyTh e public works site is located in a central point of the District and is seen as the “commons” for how the District vision will be realized. Uses proposed include the community green space located on top of a parking garage that supports area businesses, civic uses, and serves as a Metro Transit park and ride structure; a community/civic building anchoring the green; and a variety of residential uses including condominiums, apartments, and townhouse building types. Townhouse units are envisioned to front Arcadia as a building type that can incrementally “step-up” the hill, providing a character unique to the District.Public GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesTownhousesArcadia AvePublic Works SitePublic GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesEden AveArcadia AveEden AveA form-based code can guide desired building use and frontage.Page 308 of 365 203. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Land UsePublic Works Site Looking SoutheastGrandView CrossingArcadia AveEden AveHwy 100Page 309 of 365 214/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterProposed North-South SectionProposed East -West SectionLand UsePublic Works SiteGrandView Green Space on top of Parking StructureGrandView Green on top of Parking StructureNew frontage road on west side of Hwy 100ArcadiaOLGHwy 100Rail ROW Existing City RampJerry’sCommunity CenterCondominiumsTownhousesParkingEden AveGrandView CrossingPage 310 of 365 224/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBus Garage SiteLand UseEden Ave5,000 SF Retail42,000 SF Offi ce175 spaces ParkingDue to the elevation change, this site lends itself to supporting a number of commercial and retail uses by adding a small, one level parking structure contiguous to and south of Jerry’s. Th is structure would work with the existing topography to allow better access to the Jerry’s loading area and to provide additional parking to support the grocery and needed parking at grade. Th is site could also accommodate a drive-thru use such as a small community bank, cleaners, or coff ee shop.ParkingRetailOffi ce/RetailOffi ceParkingEden AveJerry’sPage 311 of 365 233. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Bus Garage Site Looking NortheastLand UseEden AveJerry’sPage 312 of 365 244/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1From a land use perspective, a number of immediate steps can be taken to set the stage for new investment in the District. Th ese include: • Policy changes to the Comprehensive Plan (the Small Area Plan is intended to update the Comprehensive Plan).• Potential zoning revisions that could include a form-based code to regulate desired public realm, building frontages, and building height.• Identifi cation of Eden and Vernon as early candidates for application of Living Streets principles.• Policy direction that guides overall sustainability of the District, including consolidated reuse/recycling, stormwater management, etc.• Policy direction that guides how new public and private investment may be supported with a variety of fi nancing tools.Th e public works site (public green space and a community/civic building) and the bus garage site are the two key parcels that can “jump-start” the redevelopment process. In particular, the ability of the public works site to provide a fee simple, unencumbered asset will allow civic/community and private and public realm uses to be realized early, and will demonstrate the leverage identifi ed in the Guiding Principles to support a variety of next steps. Th is could include a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide a parking structure that would also serve as the GrandView Commons (community/civic building/public green).In similar fashion, the bus garage can be a major pivot point for how a number of land use decisions may play out and will act as a land use “connector” along Eden. Th is site may need to be readied for development sooner than the public works site in order to accommodate a series of land use transitions that will help the larger District vision implementation. A third component of an early phase would be the development of the Wanner site currently owned by Our Lady of Grace as potential residential, offi ce, or retail uses.In support of these anticipated land use changes, new street confi gurations/alignments, circulation patterns, and streetscape/pedestrian improvements along Eden will complete a bike and pedestrian network and support the anticipated land use changes with improved automobile circulation and management.12637451. Public Works2. School Bus Garage3. New Bridge/Street4. Wanner Site5. Jerry’s Site6. Jerry’s Site7. City Ramp AccessPage 313 of 365 254/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1Hwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1 DiagramA. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic building• Arcadia steps• Community/Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail/service/offi ce useACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWanner/OLG PropertyTh e following chapter on Implementation is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or Phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site, and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time. See Appendix.C. Wanner Site• Townhouses fronting OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatmentPage 314 of 365 264/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmPublic realm refers to all land and area under the ownership of the city. Th is includes city streets and rights-of-way (ROW), parks and open space, and parcels of land or other assets that are used to provide individual and collective benefi t and amenity to all residents and the general public. Th e greater value and power of the public realm is its ability to connect neighborhoods, businesses, schools, and parks and open space into a larger whole greater than the sum of the individual elements. Streets and ROW make up a major (and connected) portion of the public realm and represent a signifi cant opportunity to enhance and connect the community. It is critical to view streets, then, not as just conveyors for automobiles but also as multi-modal facilities that provide democratic accessibility for all and as form-givers and green space that increase the livability of the community. Th e result should be a greater sense of green throughout the District.Goals• Acknowledge “no net loss,” yet aggressively seek new public space.• Improve the bike and pedestrian environment: make it safe and friendly, and include adequate parking area for bikes.• Create a community/civic building connected to GrandView Green (an outdoor public green space) that connects east and west and serves as an indoor/outdoor gathering space.• Create a prominent public realm of connected parks, green space, paths, plazas, and private open space – a legible green framework as the primary form giver.• Provide views within the District and maintain important viewsheds (such as the “grand view”) for public use.• Plan for a safe, comfortable pedestrian environment that links public and private destinations north-south (neighborhoods, library, businesses) and east-west (neighborhoods, businesses, commons, City Hall).Images (top to bottom): Osaka, Japan; Montreal, Canada; and New York, New York.Page 315 of 365 274/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmA. GrandView CommonsB. GrandView StepsC. GrandView CrossingD. Arcadia StreetscapeE. Gus Young StreetscapeF. Arcade ConnectionG. Vernon StreetscapeH. Eden StreetscapeABCDFHHGEVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St51st StPublic Realm / Open Space DiagramPage 316 of 365 284/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons For GrandView, the public works site provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. Beyond that, an even greater opportunity exists then to continuously link the businesses and destinations within the District to the surrounding neighborhoods and the city in general. Th is can begin immediately by simply investing in a safe and connected public sidewalk network, increment by increment. Th e larger vision of the public realm includes a community/civic building and GrandView Green, a connected network of public parks, public and private plazas, a new street (GrandView Crossing), sidewalk and streetscape improvements, and bike and pedestrian facilities. Th is should include bridge enhancements on Eden over Highway 100, a pedestrian and bike bridge connecting the Commons with City Hall, and the potential to connect Eden and Brookside with local a bike path within the Canada Pacifi c Rail ROW.Montreal public green: Th is public green suggests the appropriate scale and character of GrandView Green.Page 317 of 365 294/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons: GrandView Commons includes GrandView Crossing, GrandView Green, and a new community/civic building.Social InteractionExercise and FitnessClassroomTeen ActivityBanquet and ReceptionHistory / InterpretivePerforming and Visual ArtsMeetingsFood Prep / Community Oven Retail / IncubatorGrandView Crossing Pedestrian BridgeGrandView GreenCivic BuildingArcadia AveHwy 100GrandView Community Commons DiagramWhat / Who Populates the Commons?Page 318 of 365 304/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmVernon , Eden, Sherwood, LibraryEden AveEden AveLibraryTh e plan here is to focus on improving pedestrian connections between the Library/Senior Center and Jerry’s, via a more street-like character that extends north from GrandView Square Street, including a well-defi ned pedestrian crossing at Eden. Sherwood is shown as a conversion for additional parking and may still allow movement through the area, though at a very reduced rate of speed. Th is conversion allows a small green space to connect the Library to Vernon.1. Conversion of Eden Avenue would provide 50 additional parking spaces.2. A small green space connects the Library to Vernon giving the civic building an “address” on Vernon.3. Pedestrian crossings are created or enhanced to provide safe and visible locations (51st, 52nd, and 53rd Streets) on Vernon and to the west of the bus garage site on Link to cross the street.4. Th e GrandView Square area is connected to Jerry’s and beyond through the use of a streetscape that provides a well-defi ned pedestrian system as well as a more organized parking and circulation pattern.5. Any additional street and block improvements (including curb cuts and /or traffi c signals) should be considered after improvements have been made to Vernon and appropriate traffi c and parking studies have been completed (also refer to potential alternatives in the appendix)1123334Vernon AveGrandView SquareSherwoodBrookside52nd St53rd St5LinkPage 319 of 365 314/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmEden AveLibraryGrandView SquareVernon AveLibrary Site Looking EastPage 320 of 365 324/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterArcadia AveVernon AveGus Young LnJerry’sGrandView CrossingPublic RealmVernon, Gus Young, Interlachen Interl ac h e n Th e plan recommends a number of street and traffi c improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffi c, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians. Th is is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing) and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor) that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern. Anchoring the public realm is the GrandView Green, an approximately one-half + acre public space located on the north end of the public works site.1. New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing).2. GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area.3. Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair.4. Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed.5. Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon.6. Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements.7. Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100.8. Public steps of Arcadia.1233455678SummitCommunity / Civic BuildingCity Parking RampPage 321 of 365 334/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterCity HallPublic RealmVernon AveEden AveCity HallHwy 100Sunnyslope RdDale DrWith the future addition of the split-diamond interchange for Highway 100, the east side could see some signifi cant changes with the public realm, land use, and improved pedestrian/bike environments.1. Frontage road associated with the split-diamond interchange.2. Excess land from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) could be used for underground parking (with a green roof deck) and future community/civic use.3. Strategy would provide an improved/expanded Frank Tupa Park and setting for the historic Cahill School and Grange Hall.4. Grange Road alignment is “rationalized” to provide a more effi cient parking layout and allow for a small civic green (5) in front of City Hall.5. Pedestrian/bike bridge connects to west side of Highway 100.6. Eden is shown as a “parking” street to provide additional supply for City Hall.2456314Page 322 of 365 344/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationTh e GrandView area street and movement network is primarily composed of Vernon/50th Street (reliever/augmenter arterial), Eden (local street, state-aid facility) and the multiple ingress/egress ramp system of Highway 100 (designated a principal arterial). Th ere are other local streets, but most provide limited service (such as Summit Avenue) or access that dead ends (such as Brookside off Eden). Th e highway interchange has several on and off ramps that, according to MnDOT, are redundant and/or unsafe. Vernon is a county facility that, south of Interlachen, has seen a reduction of average daily traffi c over the past 10 years. Eden provides a secondary connection within the District east and west over Highway 100. Eden is designated the primary bike route through the District; Vernon and Interlachen are designated as secondary routes.Th ere are two major recommendations that support the overall movement and transportation goals of the plan. First, the Framework proposes that the Highway 100 interchange be reconfi gured into a split-diamond interchange to better manage through-traffi c and to provide improved local access/circulation via frontage roads east and west of the highway. Over time, this would provide a more connected local system (i.e., more local streets) with direct access to Highway 100 via the frontage roads. Second, the Framework proposes a new east-west street along the north half of the public works site (spanning the CP Rail corridor) connecting to Arcadia from Vernon, that would be paired with Gus Young Lane to provide a one-way circulation pattern. It would operate as one-way in (eastbound) from Vernon on the new GrandView Crossing, and one-way out (westbound) to Vernon/Interlachen on Gus Young Lane. Th is pattern would eliminate the left hand turn from Vernon (southbound) to Gus Young Lane.Bike improvements would focus on more lane area and identifi cation along Vernon and Eden, consistent with Living and Complete Streets principles. Over the long term, east-west bike and pedestrian access would be improved by adding a new bridge over Highway 100 that would connect the GrandView Commons to Tupa Park, City Hall, and the Minnehaha Creek mill area. In addition to more bike parking facilities in the District, the plan recommends an off -road option within the District: an at-grade bike path alongside the CP Rail ROW from Eden connecting to Brookside.Functional Class • Highway 100: Principal Arterial.• 50th Street: A Minor Augmenter.• Vernon Avenue: B Minor Connector.• Interlachen Boulevard: Major Collector.• Eden Avenue: Local Street.Traffi c Volume• 13,000-23,000 AADT along West 50th Street/Vernon Avenue.• 4000-8000 AADT along Eden Avenue.Goals • Support a more effi cient, compact, and safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon and Eden.• Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles to Vernon, Eden, and the local street network.• Create an improved circulation and access network between public streets/parcels and private development/destinations.• Create an enhanced parking environment that, in part, depends on shared, centrally-located District parking supplies.• Partner with Metro Transit to implement a community-scale Park and Ride and bus turnaround loop in the area.• Complete the historical transition of Vernon from old Highway 169 to a local District street.• Identify and implement a demonstration project for “Complete/Living” streets principles.• Provide additional auto, bike, and pedestrian connections east and west in the District.• Maintain and improve parking, access, and circulation in the short term for convenience, retail, and service uses.• Complete the pedestrian and bike system. Make bikes and pedestrians a priority and allow for a safe crossing over Highway 100.• Take a leadership role related to the Highway 100 interchange. Build the “reason platform” for multi-modal access and gateways.• Preserve the CP Rail corridor for future, possible public transit, and non-motorized movement/connection in the District.• Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network.Page 323 of 365 354/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterComplete/Living Streets improvementsPrivate streetscapesSplit diamond interchangeNew / improved bridgesTransportationVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100District Street FrameworkTh e movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” confi guration. Th is approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. Th e existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffi c would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term, there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffi c access and circulation in the upper core of the District. Page 324 of 365 364/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationDistrict Street FrameworkExistingProposedPage 325 of 365 374/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking WestVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Page 326 of 365 384/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationParking• Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/practical.• Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district.• Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply.Parking beneath buildingsNew access to existingSurface lotsExisting rampDirection of traffi cVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100PPPage 327 of 365 394/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationPark and Ride OptionsABCLocation Spaces NotesA Use existing ramp 244 Access issuesC New ramp in “cloverleaf” n/a Long termB New ramp on public works site 200 Fee simple587 Express RouteExisting bus stopsVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Metro Transit operates the #587 Express route through the GrandView District before turning north on Highway 100 to downtown. Th ey have a well documented market that they serve in southwest Edina, and board riders on a daily basis who are parking in front of the library, in the city ramp, and in front of a number of businesses. Th ey are highly motivated to locate a “community” scale park and ride facility that would accommodate no more than 200 cars. At least two sites have the potential to serve this need: the existing city ramp and a potential structure on the public works site. Th e existing city ramp is currently undergoing a construction project (new water treatment plant on the ground fl oor) and according to the city, this would make adding additional levels problematic. Access will also be an issue as well when the new GrandView Crossing is built. Th e city does think additional parking could be located over Brookside behind and east of Jerry’s.Under the right conditions and with some minor improvements, the public works site could be converted into a park and ride lot tomorrow. Th is would be an interim solution (a similar scenario involving the site as an interim use for the Edina bus garage could also be considered). Th e advantage of locating a park and ride on the public works site is that it is a fee simple site that could be used with little change to existing conditions. In general, a park and ride could provide a surplus of parking during nights and weekends, and serve overfl ow parking in the District as well.Page 328 of 365 404/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationVernon Avenue Right-SizingSouth of the Interlachen intersection, Vernon Avenue would be reconfi gured into a three lane, divided section that would better accommodate local traffi c movement, provide a dedicated bike lane, and capture some of the ROW for pedestrian improvements and street crossings.sidewalk8’sidewalk8’boulevard6’boulevard6’bike lane6’bike lane6’drive lane12’medianvariesdrive lane12’Proposed Section for Vernon AvenueExisting Section for Vernon Avenuedrive lane drive lane12’ 12’drive lane drive lane12’ 12’Vernon Avenue Looking South: A new three lane section would allow additional space for bikes and pedestrians, and provide controlled left turn lanes.Page 329 of 365 414/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 ImprovementsTransportationShort Term Improvements Long Term ImprovementsNew rampsEliminated rampsSignalA major proposal involves the short term and long term confi guration of the Highway 100 interchange. Th e plan proposes a “split-diamond” arrangement that would manage access on and off the highway at signalized intersections. Th ese intersections would be at Vernon and Eden, and would connect with parallel, one-way frontage roads. Th is confi guration would allow regional traffi c to clearly and safely access the highway and still move into the District with predictability and safety. Long term prospects might include the transfer of unused MnDOT ROW for local and community uses such as civic building sites, future bus rapid transit support, parking, and open space.Page 330 of 365 424/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBicycle ImprovementsTransportationPrimary bike routesSecondary bike routesTrail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of-way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District.Page 331 of 365 434/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationBicycle ImprovementsEden AvenueVernon between Eden and Interlachen Vernon south of EdenExistingExisting ExistingProposedProposed ProposedPrecedentPrecedentPage 332 of 365 444/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityOne dictionary defi nes sustainability as:• Th e ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confi rmed. • Th e quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long term ecological balance.For GrandView, sustainability is about how the natural and manmade environments coexist in a way that limits and/or prohibits harmful impact on the environment now and for generations to come. But it also has meaning for how the community and businesses will be sustained, supported, and upheld. One is not isolated or independent from the other; a comprehensive, long term defi nition of sustainability should guide how the District and the community move forward with goals, recommendations, and actions.Recent Activities Sustainability is a broad and deep subject that is constantly being refi ned from principles and policies to products and practices to fi nancing and implementation—perhaps so much so that it may seem diffi cult to determine where to begin and what next steps should be taken. For GrandView, it seems practical to review some of the recent decisions and actions the city has taken that will provide a foundation for how the District will grow, change, and redevelop.• Edina Energy & Environment Commission: Solar/wind ordinance amendments task force. City staff is reviewing proposed ordinance. • PACE Financing: Th e Edina City Council unanimously adopted the Edina Emerald Energy Program November 15, 2011, making it the fi rst Minnesota city to take advantage of Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) legislation. PACE, which was approved by the state Legislature in 2010, allows property owners to have the cost of energy effi ciency and conservation improvements assessed to their property and paid alongside property taxes. GrandView Tire & Auto, 5415 70th Street West, used the tool for the necessary fi nancing to install a 27-kilowatt solar panel system on the already green auto shop’s roof.• New Public Works Facility: Th e public works building was built with sustainability in mind. It has geothermal heating and cooling and used recycled materials, and its landscape was designed to minimize the development’s impact on the environment. A rain garden at the corner of 74th and Metro Boulevard holds and infi ltrates water from sloping parking lots with curb cuts to direct the water to native grasses and plants.• City Hall: Installation of solar panel project in Fall of 2011.• City Council Living Streets policy: Recommendation of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) to establish a comprehensive Living Streets Policy that integrated all modes of transportation and addressed issues such as traffi c calming, stormwater management, promoting active living, community feel, improving walking and biking, and enhancing urban forests. If approved by the Council, the ETC would work in collaboration with staff to prepare the policy for the Council’s future consideration. Mr. Sullivan reported a $15,000 grant was available to initiate the creation of this policy, which may cost $60,000-$100,000 to complete. • Adoption of MinesotaGreenStep Cities program, 2011: On January 18, 2011, Edina passed a council resolution to become a member of the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. Minnesota GreenStep Cities is a voluntary challenge, assistance, and recognition program to help cities achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices. Each best practice can be implemented by completing one or more specifi c actions from a list of four to eight actions. Th ese actions are tailored to all Minnesota cities, focus on cost savings and energy use reduction, and encourage innovation.Page 333 of 365 454/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityGreenstep’s 28 Best PracticesBuildings and Lighting1. Effi cient Existing Public Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.2. Effi cient Existing Private Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.3. New Green Buildings: Construct new buildings to meet or qualify for a green building standard.4. Effi cient Building & Street Lighting and Signals: Improve the effi ciency of public and private lighting and signals.5. Building Reuse: Create economic and regulatory incentives for redeveloping and repurposing existing buildings before building new.Land Use6. Comprehensive Plan and Implementation: Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it.7. Effi cient City Growth: Promote fi nancial and environmental sustainability by enabling and encouraging higher density housing and commercial land use.8. Mixed Uses: Develop effi cient and healthy land patterns.9. Effi cient Highway-Oriented Development:Adopt commercial development and design standards for highway road corridors.10. Conservation Design: Adopt development ordinances or processes that protect natural systems.Transportation11. Complete Green Streets: Create a network of multi-modal green streets.12. Mobility Options: Promote active living and alternatives to single-occupancy car travel.13. Effi cient City Fleets: Implement a city fl eet investment, operations, and maintenance plan.14. Demand-Side Travel Planning: Implement Travel Demand Management and Transit-Oriented Design.Environmental Management15. Purchasing: Adopt environmentally preferable purchasing policies and practices.16. Urban Forests: Increase city tree and plant cover.17. Ecologic Stormwater Management: Minimize the volume of and pollutants in rainwater runoff .18. Parks and Trails: Enhance the city’s green infrastructure.19. Surface Water Quality: Improve local water bodies.20. Effi cient Water and Wastewater Facilities: Assess and improve drinking water and wastewater facilities.21. Septic Systems: Implement an eff ective management program for decentralized wastewater treatment systems.22. Solid Waste Reduction: Increase waste reduction, reuse and recycling.23. Local Air Quality: Prevent generation of local air contaminants.Economic and Community Development24. Benchmarks & Community Engagement: Adopt outcome measures for GreenStep and other city sustainability eff orts, and engage community members in ongoing education, dialogue, and campaigns.25. Green Business Development: Document the use of assistance programs for green business and job development.26. Renewable Energy: Remove barriers to and encourage installation of renewable energy generation capacity.27. Local Food: Strengthen local food and fi ber production and access.28. Business Synergies: Network/cluster businesses to achieve better energy, economic, and environmental outcomes.Page 334 of 365 464/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Goals• Take a position on sustainability; be a model for city wide sustainability.• Defi ne incentives to attract “Best-in-Class” development that deliver highest levels of sustainable design.• Take advantage of “free” resources: wind, rain, and sun.• Reduce heat island eff ect and create a pedestrian environment that is pleasant, shaded, and visually interesting.• Address stormwater runoff in all phases and facets of the District.• Build on existing infrastructure.• Take advantage of available partnerships/funding.• Create District (not separate site) solutions.• Apply GreenStep Best Practices.RecommendationsA number of recommendations should be considered for the District and emerge from what is being done by the City Council, Energy & Environment Commission, Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, other boards/commissions, and various stakeholders. Th e GreenStep Cities best practices are an obvious start to how these apply to the District. Beyond that, it will be important to defi ne the District in an organizational manner so that roles and responsibilities can be defi ned and actions coordinated. A good example would be how a District committee on sustainability could begin to defi ne the “GrandView Works”—a sustainable practices approach for how water, waste, and energy are addressed from a District point of view.For GrandView, there are three levels of approach and opportunity that build from what is being done today in the District (in some cases by individual businesses or owners) and lay the groundwork for a sustainable strategy:1. Work from existing strengths and build the foundation• Respond to existing plans, policies, and best practices already in place (local, county, and regional policies).• Educate District stakeholders about best practices, case studies, etc.• Establish a general communications structure and forum for what is being done.• Consider new policy to focus on redevelopment areas like GrandView with sustainability guidelines.• Stormwater management policy at the District level (works with both watersheds).• Pilot project(s) for solar light installation (pedestrian and parking areas).2. District Systems• Stormwater strategy under parking collection/storage/treatment/reuse.• Recycle/reuse building materials (after demolition).• Grey water use.• Trash collection and recycling within the District beyond what is currently required by the city.• Consolidated organic recycling focused on restaurants in the area.• Generate alternative power for specifi c uses/needs.• Green and white roofs.3. Closed Loops• Recycled stormwater into drinking water supply.• Recycled grey water into drinking water supply.• Off -the-grid.• Green buildings—zero carbon.Page 335 of 365 474/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Page 336 of 365 4/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposePage 337 of 365 494/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Strategy1. Adopt the framework as a part of the Comprehensive Plan.As a policy document, the Comprehensive Plan off ers the ability to guide future development in the GrandView District even in the absence of more defi nitive plans. Once adopted, the framework provides signifi cant context for determining further directions and actions in the GrandView District.2. Establish an Implementation Steering Committee using citizen volunteers to guide the eff ort, including providing direction for key remaining areas of the framework, with working groups as needed to support the work of the Implementation Steering Committee.An over-riding objective of the GrandView District planning process is to utilize local citizens as experts in defi ning directions for an area identifi ed in the Comprehensive Plan as a location where the potential for change exists. With signifi cant investment of time, talent, and energy, in addition to the local knowledge that has been developed through the Small Area Guide process and the Small Area Plan process, it is logical that the process of planning using local citizens to guide the process should continue. Th e process to be pursued should, as in past eff orts leading to the framework, be defi ned by the citizen volunteers.5. Set a plan for the evolution of the District.Th e planning process was established with the understanding that the GrandView District would redevelop incrementally in concert with a vision defi ned by the community. A key aspect of the plan, and one that can be best defi ned once several of the decision points in Step 4 (above) have been advanced, is to determine a logical, sustainable, and reasonably defi nitive plan for its evolution.6. Provide regular updates to the City Council.A Steering Committee charged with guiding the further development of a plan for the GrandView District cannot act independently of other actions of the city, just as the area itself cannot evolve independent of the rest of the Edina community. With regular updates, the evolving plan can be assured that it aligns with other policies of the city.3. Evaluate the GrandView District small area planning process as a means of engaging citizens in local planning.As indicated in the Comprehensive Plan, several areas of potential change remain in the community. An objective review of the GrandView process will allow the city to determine whether it should be replicated, modifi ed, or abandoned as a local planning tool. 4. Initiate a process led by the Implementation Steering Committee to provide direction for key remaining areas of the framework.Remaining key decision points, many of which are interrelated but all of which must be defi ned in terms of the approved framework, include:• Transportation elements• Density and height• Housing aff ordability• Financing• Design and development guidelines• Community BuildingPage 338 of 365 504/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1-5 years5-10 years10+ yearsVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Generalized Phasing PlanA generalized phasing plan is shown that organizes phasing into three simplifi ed increments with the understanding that a variety of conditions will infl uence actual investment and implementation.1. Policy and RegulationTh is Framework recommends (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan) that the District evolve from a Community Commercial Node (pg. 4-31 Comprehensive Plan) into a mixed-use center. However, the Plan also suggests a vision that may not be completely consistent with current zoning including how use, built form, and parking may be regulated. Concurrent with other implementation activities, zoning revisions, including the potential use of a form-based code and design guidelines will be addressed by the Implementation Steering Committee after approval of the Framework by the City Council. 2. Phasing, Development & FinanceTh e following graphic begins the discussion about how to best arrange and prioritize the public land parcels (public works site and school bus garage site) so that new investment and redevelopment can occur in a timely manner and in response to market and community forces. Central in this discussion is the school bus garage site which, when a new garage site can be found, can include new commercial/offi ce uses, replacement of existing uses, expansion of businesses in the district currently in need of more space (such as the municipal liquor store), and parking. Th is could help set the stage for how next steps could be accomplished including initial investment on the public works site, parking and circulation enhancements/additions, and Eden Avenue improvements. In addition, a community building / public green programming group should work during this phase to determine appropriate program and uses. Page 339 of 365 514/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Immediate < 1 year1 Development Framework approval2 Policy for implementation/fi nance3 Create Implementation Committee4. Implementation Committee should address programming of community / civic building5 Create sustainability guide from GreenStep6 TIF District7A Design Guidelines7 Form-based code for mixed use center8 Green building standards required for district9 Prepare Phase 1 Master Plan10 Address Lifecycle and aff ordable housing1-5 YearsLand Use11 Bus Garage site redevelopment12 Townhouse units on public works site13 Residential on Warner site/OLG14 Community / Civic buildingPublic Realm15 GrandView Green over parking structure16 Arcadia Steps/and streetscape17 CP Rail bike path from Eden to Brookside18 Add tree lined streetscape and monument signs into Richmond Hills neighborhoodTransportation/Infrastructure19 Park n ride structure/green roof@public works site20 Additional parking south of Jerry’s21 GrandView Crossing bridge & street22 Eden Living Streets/streetscape /3 lane section23 Eden Living Streets/Arcadia/Normandale24 New access from Eden to city ramp parking25 Jerry’s parking Streetscape26 Implement one-way pairs/remove left to G. Young27 Reservation on public works site for rail transit use Sustainability28 GrandView Works/Organics recycling center 29 Stormwater reuse & management policy30 Solar pilot project for public lightingMajor RecommendationsPage 340 of 365 524/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation5-10 YearsLand Use31 Arcadia site redevelopment/include pocket park32 Apt/condo units on public works site33 Residential on Warner site/OLG/Phase 2Public Realm34 Small civic green at City Hall35 Arcadia streetscape improvementsTransportation/Infrastructure36 Vernon Living Streets/streetscape/3 lane section37 Dedicate right turn from Vernon to Interlachen38 Reconfi gure Eden as parking street@City Hall39 Eden bridge pedestrian/bike enhancements40 Vernon as primary bike route to GrandView Crossing41 Consider ‘turn-back’ of Vernon from County42 Complete Streets: Library green space fronting Vernon 43 Reconfi gure Eden as parking streetSustainability44 Stormwater collection/treatment system45 Grey water reuse/irrigation, etc.46 GrandView Works/geothermal at OLG fi elds10+ YearsLand Use47 East frontage road site redevelopment48 Civic development on excess MNDOT landPublic Realm49 Hwy 100 pedestrian/bike bridge50 Green roof/space over underground parking51 Add green space to Tupa Park52 Include gateway walls/landscape w/interchangeTransportation/Infrastructure53 Hwy 110 split diamond interchange54 Realignment of Grange Rd/Eden55 Add Gus Young extension to frontage roadSustainability56 Closed loop water supply system57 GrandView Works/Alternative energy sourcesMajor RecommendationsPage 341 of 365 534/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1DC - Downtown Core StandardsSide(2) Siting(3) Heightat the front of the lot: a minimum of 75% of build-ing facade shall be placed within 5 feet of the front lot line. This requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street or sidewalk 5’see Height Overlay District for minimum and maximum heights and upper storey stepbacksat the rear of the lot: 10’ setback required for load-ing areas, none if adjacent to street or alley.parking setback line30’at the side of the lot: none required. One side of build-inmg must be placed at the side lot line. Also refer to Neighborhood Compatibility requirements 10’commerceresidentialfi nished fl oor height: avg 3 feet above sidewalkfi nished fl oor height: maximum 18 inches above sidewalkA. Building Height i. Th e buildings shall be at least 2 storeys in height but no greater than the heights as designated on map____. Upper storey step backs are also designated on map____.B. Ground Storey Height: Commerce Uses i. Th e average ground storey fl oor elevation within 30 feet of the front property line shall be 1.Not lower than the front sidewalk elevation. 2.Not higher than 18 inches above the sidewalk. ii. Th e ground storey shall have at least 15 feet of clear interior height contiguous to the front property line for a minimum depth of 25 feet. iii. Th e maximum ground storey height is 22 feet, measured from the sidewalk to the second storey fl oor. C. Ground Storey Height (residential uses) i. Th e average fi nished fl oor elevation shall be no less than 3 feet above the sidewalk at the front property line ii. Th e ground storey shall have an interior clear height of at least 9 feet and a maximum sidewalk to second storey fl oor height of 22 feet. d. Upper storey height i. Th e maximum clear height (fl oor to ceiling) for upper storeys is 12 feet. ii. At least 80% of each upper storey shall have an interior clear height (fl oor to ceiling) of at least 9 feet. A. Façadei. On each lot the building façade shall be built to within 5 feet of the front property line for at least 75% of it’s length. Th is requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street and public sidewalk. ii. Within 10 feet of a block corner, the ground storey façade may be pulled away to form a corner entry. B. Usable Open Spacei. A minimum of 40 square feet per residential unit shall be pro-vided. Th is space may be shared among units, or may take the form of balconies, roof decks, usable portions of green roofs or other above ground amenities. ii. Open space created infront of the building shall be designed as semi-public space, used as a forecourt, outdoor seating or other semi-public uses. C. Garage and Parkingi. Parking garage openings visible from the sidewalk shall have a clear maximum height of 16 feet and a maximum width of 22 feet. ii. Parking shall be located behind the parking setback lineMin 9ftMax 12ft clear (typ) max 22 ft (typ) (typ) (typ) PropertiesMinimum HeightMaximum HeightPublic realm / Private realmResultA form based approach is organized to code development that defi nes the public realm.Example of form-based code standards for a downtown setting.Page 342 of 365 544/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Financial FeasibilityFeasibility of fi nancing would include: (1) projections of anticipated costs associated with an initial Phase 1 plan and (2) options for revenues to pay those costs. Th is includes items such as street improvements, streetscape improvements, parking infrastructure, property acquisition (i.e., the bus garage), and community space (both potential “commons” or “public realm” space and “programming” or “community/civic center” space). At this point six potential pools or “buckets” of revenue have been identifi ed:1. TIF, Abatement, and other statutory economic development tools;2. Special Assessments;3. Enhanced Property Tax revenues generated by private property development;4. Other Public Sources of funds;5. Non-Profi t or Philanthropic Fundraising; and6. City Tax Revenues.1. TIF, Abatement, and Other Statutory Economic Development Tools.Access some portion of existing TIF Funds; there may be an opportunity to use existing TIF funds. Determine the circumstances under which that is possible and the consequences of doing so.Create a new TIF district. TIF and Abatement tools provide opportunities to “capture” increased value and use it to fi nance some parts of redevelopment. Determine a sense of the potential numbers associated with these options and any limits on how the funds generated by these mechanisms can be spent.2. Special Assessments and Related Tools. Th e City may assess properties that “benefi t” from public improvements for the costs of these improvements up to the value of the benefi t conferred by the improvements. Determine what types of costs are eligible to be recovered using this tool and on related tools that permit the creation of special districts to spread the ongoing costs of maintenance or other improvements. Th e 50th and France area may provide a model for this. 3. Enhanced Property Tax Revenues Generated by Private Development. Th is idea overlaps to a certain extent with #1 above (to the extent the enhanced value will be “captured” via TIF or Abatement). Obviously, the greatest increase of this type would be new development on parcels (like the Public Works and School Bus Garage sites). And consider the prospect of enhanced value emanating from redevelopment of sites (e.g., CSM, Eden 100, etc.) that are already on the tax rolls; having some models of what is reasonable to expect in this category is important.4. Other Public Sources of Funds. Consider the potential partnerships with other public entities that might be able to help with funding. Th e planning activities in this phase of the process have been funded by the Met Council; there might be a prospect of additional funds as planning and implementation move forward. Met Council representatives have also been clear in expressing interest in park and ride facilities. In addition to the Met Council, there are prospects for partnership with MnDOT (related to Highway 100) and Hennepin County (related to Vernon Avenue). To the extent that housing is a part of future redevelopment, there may be Regional, State, and/or Federal funds available to support those eff orts. Th ese any other prospective sources of “Other Public Funds” should be summarized and estimated. 5. Non-Profi t and Philanthropic Fundraising.Consider that private contributions could help with funding. Th ese potential sources of revenue fall into two categories: (1) funds from existing non-profi t organizations interested in supporting particular development initiatives (e.g., housing, arts, etc.) and (2) fundraising campaigns created specifi cally for this eff ort. Determine what is reasonable to expect from each “bucket” and be able to determine whether the “gap” remaining after all other “buckets” are utilized can be fi lled by some kind of capital campaign.6. City Tax Revenues. Th e other way to fi ll any remaining gap is with City tax revenues. Obviously, this is a decision for the City Council to make. It will be important to identify the size of the gap (if any) that will likely need to be fi lled by such funding. Page 343 of 365 554/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementationPossible Staging Questions1. Interim use. Designation of City parking ramp for park and ride?2. Disposition of School Bus Garage Site. Can City negotiate control? If so, when and what are the next steps? RFI? RFP? Negotiate existing user in the District to acquire and invest. 3. How can public works site be best utilized in the interim? As temporary (2-3 year) school bus garage operations? As surface park and ride until structure is built? RFI? RFP? Interim use could allow time for community building use/need to be determined. 4. How to leverage adjacent parcels with timing of bus garage site redevelopment?5. What is timing/feasibility of west side frontage road/southbound ramp confi guration? How to advance that agenda in the short term (1-5 years).6. Eden could / should be programmed for Living Streets improvements consistent with initial phases of development. 7. Feasibility of timing of street, bridge, and deck improvements. 24617365Vernon AveEden AveHwy 100Page 344 of 365 4/05/125. AppendixPage 345 of 365 574/05/125. AppendixImplementationHwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1ACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWagner / OLG PropertyTh e following Implementation section is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time.Phase 1A. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic Building• Arcadia Steps• Community Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail / service offi ce use• Possible drive - thru useC. Warner Site• Townhouses fronting the OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatmentPage 346 of 365 584/05/125. AppendixImplementation GrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲBusGarageSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sfNonͲresidentialcommercial 5,000 950,000.00$190.00$office 42,000 7,980,000.00$190.00$rampparking 75 937,500.00$12,500.00$surfaceparking 75 112,500.00$1,500.00$47,000 150 9,980,000.00$Page 347 of 365 594/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲPublicWorksSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostResidentialtownhouse 16 46 8,832,000.00$160 1200 192000smallhouse 0 150 1200 180000apartment 42 64 6,426,000.00$170 900 153000condo 24 48 5,472,000.00$190 1200 228000Total 82 158 20,730,000.00$NonͲresidentialcommercial150office150community 50,000 10,000,000.00$200parking200 3,500,000.00$17,500parknride 200 3,500,000.00$17,500Total 400 17,000,000.00$Page 348 of 365 604/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲInfrastructureandStreetsLF Ac PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostInfrastructureVernon(*) 950 332,500.00$350crosswalk 5 25,000.00$5000roadway 1,500,000.00$EdenWest(*) 385 134,750.00$350EdenEast 200 70,000.00$350crosswalk 3 15,000.00$5000roadway 1,500,000.00$Jerrysstreet 875 306,250$350$GusYoungext(*) 150 52,500$350$OLGroad 150 52,500.00$350Bridges(EST)eachGͲViewCrossing 750,000.00$estCPRail 750,000.00$estsubtotal 5,488,500.00$HWY100Splitdiamond(est) $10,000,000Ped/Bike(est) 1,500,000.00$(*)ͲDoesnotincludebudgetsforroadwayimprovements/updgrades/reconstructionͲbudgetsareforlandscape/streetscapeonlyPage 349 of 365 614/05/125. AppendixVernon and InterchangeTransportationPage 350 of 365 624/05/125. AppendixVernonTransportationPage 351 of 365 634/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit DiamondPage 352 of 365 644/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit DiamondPage 353 of 365 654/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesLibrary / Eden / LinkProposed Illustrative Plan (p.16)Alternative 1Alternative 2Alternative 3: Streetscape improvementsPage 354 of 365 664/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesArcadia and Gus YoungProposed Illustrative Plan (p. 16) Alternative 1 Alternative 2Page 355 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Action Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 9.4 Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager Item Type: Ordinance Department: Administration Item Title: Ordinance No. 2025-01: Amending Chapter 8 Concerning the Sale of Inhumanely Bred Animals Action Requested: Approve Ordinance No. 2025-01 amending Chapter 8 concerning the Sale of Inhumanely Bred Animals and grant first reading. Information/Background: The proposed ordinance was prepared at the request of Council Member Agnew. Council Member Agnew will speak about the purpose of the proposed ordinance at the Council’s January 21, 2025, meeting. Supporting Documentation: 1. Ordinance No. 2025-01: Concerning Sale of Inhumanely Bred Animals Page 356 of 365 234298v1 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE III OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING THE SALE OF INHUMANELY BRED ANIMALS The City Council of Edina Ordains: Section I.Chapter 8, Article III of the Edina City Code is amended to add the following Section 8-118: Sec. 8-118. – Sale or showcase of inhumanely bred animals prohibited. (a)Purpose and Findings. The City Council finds that current federal, state, and local regulation of commercial kennels and breeding facilities do not adequately address the health and well-being of animals through the point of sale. The City Council also finds that many commercial kennels showcase adoptable animals or collaborate with local animals shelters and rescue organizations to support adoption and care efforts for abandoned, abused, or stray animals. The City council seeks to discourage the inhumane breeding of animals by eliminating their profitability through sale to commercial kennels without limiting commercial kennels from engaging in collaborative efforts to care for and sell animals sourced through a reputable breeder, impound, shelter, or rescue organization. The City Council therefore adopts the following regulations pursuant to its power to regulate the keeping of animals under Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. 21. (b) No person holding a license to maintain a commercial kennel under this chapter may purchase, acquire, or otherwise obtain any animal for sale or showcase from a breeder that is not USDA licensed or does not otherwise follow state and federal minimum breeding standards at the time of the transfer of the animal to the commercial kennel. (c) Nothing in this section shall prevent a commercial kennel licensee from purchasing, acquiring, or otherwise obtaining any animal for sale or showcase from a person, shelter, or organization that cares for or houses animals not bred by that person, shelter, or organization without a USDA license or in violation of state and federal minimum breeding standards, or animals considered abandoned, abused, stray, or lawfully impounded. (d) A commercial kennel shall display a notice in a conspicuous place on or within three feet of each animal’s kennel, cage, or enclosure that identifies the name of the source from which the animal was obtained and the source’s contact information. This information must also be provided to each animal’s adopter upon sale and maintained by the commercial kennel for review upon request of the animal control officer or other persons designated by the City to enforce this Chapter. (e) Any person operating a commercial kennel in violation of any of the above provisions shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 8-3 for each violation. Page 357 of 365 234298v1 Section 2.This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: January 21, 2025 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: _________________________ _________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send one affidavit of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Page 358 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 10.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Minutes Department: Engineering Item Title: Minutes: Transportation Commission, November 21, 2024 Action Requested: Receive the minutes of the Transportation Commission from November 21, 2024. Information/Background: See attached minutes. Supporting Documentation: 1. Minutes: Transportation Commission, November 21, 2024 Page 359 of 365 Page 360 of 365 Page 361 of 365 Page 362 of 365 d ITEM REPORT Date: January 21, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 10.2 Prepared By: Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager Item Type: Minutes Department: Engineering Item Title: Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission, December 12, 2024 Action Requested: Receive meeting minutes. Information/Background: Receive Energy and Environment Commission meeting minutes from their December 12, 2024 meeting. Supporting Documentation: 1. EEC Meeting Minutes, Dec. 12, 2024 Page 363 of 365 MINUTES OF THE ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM THURSDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2024 Meeting location: Edina City Hall Community Room 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 1. Call to Order Chair Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. 2. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Lukens, Haugen, Walker, Bartholomew, Tessman, Schima and Weber. Absent were Commissioners Martinez-Salgado and Dakane, and student Commissioners Langsweirdt and Srivastav. 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda Bartholomew made a motion, seconded by Walker, to Approve Meeting Agenda. Motion Carried. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes from November 14, 2024 Meeting Schima made a motion, seconded by Bartholomew, to Approve Meeting Minutes. Motion Carried. 5. Special Recognitions and Presentations 5.1. 2023 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Ted Redmond with PaleBlueDot presented the 2023 Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Edina has achieved a 17% reduction from baseline, which is on track with where we'd expect to be, but there are some upward trends in specific sectors Edina should be paying attention to. A major driver of change for emissions reduction is utility-scale grid decarbonization, which affects the Buildings & Energy sector. Commissioners asked questions about opportunities to reach our goals, including where to focus between now and 2030. Commissioners stressed the importance that there is still work to do for the commission, staff and Council to reach the Climate Action Plan goals. 6. Community Comment A resident observing the meeting noted they appreciated the discussion and are interested in school engagement, particularly the ability to impact and reach a lot of homes and residents. Page 364 of 365 7. Reports/Recommendations 7.1. Time of Sale with Energy Disclosure Staff Report Follow Up Sustainability Manager Bayer reviewed data to answer questions asked by the EEC at the November meeting. EEC will draft an Advisory Communication as a "cover page" to their existing report, which will be shared at a future meeting. 7.2. Paved Area / Community Gardens Work Plan Item Commissioner Weber noted that she has drafted the study and report. Sustainability Manager Bayer will send it out to the EEC to review ahead of the January meeting where they will be asked to approve the report. 8. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioners shared frustration with the work plan process and suggested more collaborative ways to approach the work. • Commissioners discussed how to encourage and engage the community to participate and support topics important to the EEC's work. • Commissioners asked for an update on the tree protection ordinance. Sustainability Manager Bayer noted a meeting has not happened and she will keep them updated when more information is available. 9. Staff Comments 9.1. Approved 2025 Work Plan The 2025 approved workplan will be entered into Envisio. The major change was separating out the "catch all" work plan item into individual projects, and recommending the EEC reach out to an already established community event that supports EVs rather than host their own standalone event. Commissioners expressed an interest in still hosting an EV event and will be requesting it be added back to the workplan. Sustainability Manager Bayer noted that she will be presenting the benchmarking ordinance updates discussed in November at the Dec. 17 City Council meeting. 10. Adjournment Haugen made a motion, seconded by Tessman, to Adjourn. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:24 p.m. Page 365 of 365