The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-03-26 Planning Commission Regular Meeing Packet Meeting location: Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Wednesday, March 26, 2025 7:00 PM Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or at YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535- 8110. Enter access code 2868 688 0356. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn. Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927- 8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes from the March 12, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting 5. Special Recognitions and Presentations 5.1. Election of Officers 6. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. 7. Public Hearing During "Public Hearings," the Commission chair will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Chair may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, Page 1 of 492 cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 7.1. Variance for the Edina Aquatic Center Water Treatment Building Expansion 7.2. Sign Variances for Meeting House Church, 6200 Colonial Way 7.3. Rezoning, Subdivision, Site Plan with Variances at 5100 Eden Avenue for Opus 8. Chair and Member Comments 9. Staff Comments 10. Adjournment Page 2 of 492 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 1 of 4 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers March 12, 2025 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Alkire, Daye, Felt, Hahneman, Nelson, Padilla, Smith, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Emily Dalrymple, Assistant Planner; and Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Bornstein and Student Commissioners Jha and Joncas. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Alkire moved to approve the March 12, 2025, agenda. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. (The meeting video started after this motion) IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, January 29, 2025 Commissioner Hahneman moved to approve the January 29, 2025, meeting minutes. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment None. VI. Public Hearings A. Front Yard Setback Variance Request – 5205 Minnehaha Blvd Director Teague presented 5205 Minnehaha Blvd's request for a front yard setback variance. Staff recommends approval of the setback variance, as requested, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Page 3 of 492 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Francois Charette, the property owner, addressed the Commission. Mr. Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, addressed the Commission and answered questions of the Commission. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Padilla moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the front yard setback variance. Motion Commissioner Hahneman moved that the Planning Commission approve the 33.77 ft front yard setback variance as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Commission discussion for the variance can be viewed on the official City website. B. Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Building Height Variance – 7001 York Avenue South, Southdale Library and Art Center Assistant Planner Dalrymple presented 7001 York Avenue South's request for a conditional use permit, site plan, and building height variance. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, site plan, and building height variance, as requested, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Liz Veaderki, Project Manager for Hennepin County, and Mr. Matthew Kruntorad, MSR Design, presented to the Commission. Mr. Scott Duimstra, Library Director for Hennepin County Library, and Ms. Britta Hansen, EOR, were introduced to help with questions. The applicants answered Commission questions. Public Hearing Mr. Michael Wearing, 7220 York Avenue South, addressed the Commission in favor of the building height variance. Page 4 of 492 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 3 of 4 Commissioner Alkire moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission deliberated and commented on this item, including noise and site features. Motion Commissioner Padilla moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Building Height Variance for 7001 York Avenue as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Nelson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The official city website provides access to the commission discussion for the conditional use permit, site plan, and building height variance. RECESS: The Commission recessed at 9:41 p.m. and reconvened at 9:45 p.m. C. Lincoln and Londonderry Small Area Plan Community Development Coordinator Lewis introduced the Lincoln and Londonderry Small Area Plan. Commissioner Felt, Commissioner Daye, and Zakcq Lockrem of Mend Collective presented the draft of the Lincoln and Londonderry Small Area Plan. The Commission asked questions regarding the small area plan. Public Hearing Mr. Elliot Howard, 4800 West 62nd Street, addressed the Commission in favor of the Lincoln and Londonderry Small Area Plan. Commissioner Hahneman moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission deliberated and shared their reasons for supporting and opposing the small area plan. Motion Commissioner Alkire moved that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council authorize staff to submit the Lincoln and Londonderry Small Area Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. Motion carried 6 ayes, 1 nay (Hahneman), 1 abstain (Padilla). The Commission examined the small area plan and provided feedback, which can be viewed in the official meeting video. Page 5 of 492 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 4 of 4 VII. Reports/Recommendations None. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Received. IX. Staff Comments None. X. Adjournment Commissioner Nelson moved to adjourn the March 12, 2025, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 10:57 p.m. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Page 6 of 492 d ITEM REPORT Date: March 26, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Planning Commission Agenda Number: 7.1 Prepared By: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Item Title: Variance for the Edina Aquatic Center Water Treatment Building Expansion Action Requested:Approve the 11.5 ft setback variance from the OHWE of a pond. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal for the pump room expansion is reasonable. The use is associated with a permitted use in the Single dwelling Unit District with the Aquatic Center, and all its necessary parts are compatible with uses in the Single Dwelling Unit District. 2. The use is consistent with the Future Land Use designation for Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The variance is needed due to the functionally obsolete size of the existing building built in 1958, constructed under different setback requirements, which are current hold-over conditions that were not created by the applicant on behalf or the Aquatic Center. 4. The variance to allow the expansion of the proposed pump house space will not alter the essential character of the locality. The new pump house with the upper pavilion will enhance the user experience of the center and address current operational deficiencies, with minimal intrusion into setback. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The survey, plans and engineering submissions attached to this staff report dated February 21, 2025. 2. Watershed District approval. 3. Conformance with the City Engineer’s building permit review. 4. Conformance with tree plan as part of building permit review. Information/Background: The City of Edina is requesting an 11.5 ft variance from the 50 ft setback requirement from the OHWE of a pond in Sec. 36-1268 of the Edina City Code. The request is to allow a proposed water treatment building expansion to the Aquatic Center to be located 38.5 ft from a ponding area at 4300 West 66th Street. Resources/Financial Impacts: • Budget – was it budgeted? If not, what are the impacts? • Implementation – how/who will implement this and what are the impacts? • Operation – how/who is going to maintain this and what are the impacts? Page 7 of 492 Relationship to City Policies: List policies, strategic plans, work plans, etc related to this item. i.e. Comp plan, CAP, CIP Supporting Documentation: 1. Staff Report 2. Project Narrative 3. Applicant Submittal 4. Tree Protection Plan 5. Staff Presentation Page 8 of 492 March 26, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-25-04, Variance request at 4300 West 66th Street/Edina Aquatic Center. Information / Background: The applicant, HGA Architects and Engineers, on behalf of their client, the City of Edina, is requesting an 11.5 ft variance from Section 36-1268, requiring a 50 ft setback from the ordinary high-water elevation, (OHWL), of a naturally occurring lake, pond or stream to allow a setback of 38.5 ft for a proposed pump room facility replacement. The proposed Pump Room is located to the North of the original Pump Room, situated between the original Pump Room and West 64th street. The City Code lists the following regarding required distances from water bodies: Sec. 36-1268. - Setbacks from naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams. Notwithstanding any other requirements of this chapter or other provisions of this Code, in cases where a portion of a lot or tract is located below the ordinary high-water elevation of a naturally occurring lake, pond or stream, the shoreline created by such an ordinary high-water elevation shall be deemed to be the rear lot line or side lot line, as the case may be, for setback purposes. All principal and accessory structures shall maintain a minimum setback of 50 feet from the ordinary high-water elevation, except that all principal and accessory structures shall maintain a minimum setback of 75 feet from the ordinary high-water elevation of Indianhead Lake, Arrowhead Lake, Mirror Lake and Lake Cornelia. The Aquatic Center/Rosland Park is a permitted principal use in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit zoning district. The request is for a pump room replacement at the Edina Aquatics Center. Given the physical site limitations, as well as the location of existing aquatics facility infrastructure, the project is requesting a variance to this setback to reduce it to 38’-6”. The addition footprint to OHWL requires a variance of 11.5 ft. The Shape of the pond is not perpendicular to the proposed building expansion, with the average setback closer to 42’-0”, and with the closest point of the expansion at 38’-6” from the OHWL. The Edina Aquatic Center facility consists of an admissions area, concession stand, bathhouse and four separate water areas, including an 8 lane 50-meter pool, a zero-depth entry pool, a plunge pool and a surf simulator. The facility sees approximately 85,000 visitors a year during an eleven-week season. The Edina Aquatic Center opened in 1958 with some of the current infrastructure 67 years old. The original Pump Room has undergone retrofits and additions over the decades, but years of exposure to corrosive gases due mainly to the use of liquid muriatic acid, and a very limiting head room height in the range of Page 9 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 2 about 8’-0” to 9’-6” makes the space functionally unsuitable for modern equipment. In Summer of 2022, HGA Architects and Engineers were contracted by the City of Edina to perform an existing conditions assessment of the Aquatic Center Pump Room. The report that followed outlined several critical deficiencies relative to the physical structure, mechanical and electrical systems, and operational needs of the 1950’s era Pump Room, ultimately deeming it in poor physical condition and operationally outdated. HGA Architects and Engineers have presented a concept design for a Pump Room facility acceptable for addressing the needs of the Aquatic Center. The proposed facility includes a filtration room, appropriately sized to serve the needs of the 3 bodies of water that the original filtration room currently serves. The new filtration room also provides appropriate vertical clearances for the pool filters (11’-8” clearance from floor to ceiling). In addition to the filtration room, the first floor of the facility provides a separate pool boiler room, two new chemical storage spaces, including a rated hazardous room for chlorine tablet storage, a loading dock, and storage to support the facilities operation. The pool deck level of the proposed project includes a patron pavilion dedicated to elevating the user experience as well as providing much needed off- season deck storage. It will also provide additional areas of shade for patrons. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: R-1; zoned (Single Dwelling Unit District); guided Low Density residential. Easterly: PRD-4; zoned (Planned Residence District); guided High Density Residential. Southerly: R-1; zoned (Single Dwelling Unit District); guided Low Density residential. Westerly: R-1; zoned (Single Dwelling Unit District); guided Low Density residential. Existing Site Features The site contains an admissions area, concession stand, bathhouse and four separate bodies of water, including an 8 lane 50-meter pool, a zero-depth entry pool, a plunge pool and a surf simulator and paved parking area. Planning Guide Plan Designation: Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District Page 10 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues •Is the proposed variance justified? Yes, staff believe the requested variance is justified. Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The first floor of the Pump Room is proposed to be located at an ‘average’ of 42’-0” setback from pond’s ordinary high-water elevation (OHWL) of 862.9; with its greatest pinch-point at 38’-6” setback from OHWL. This location provides for the minimum required usable space within the pumproom to meet the operational requirements and physical requirements of the pump room equipment, while providing the greatest possible setback from the ordinary high-water elevation, as well as from west 64th street. 2) The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff believe that the proposed use is reasonable given it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property for Low Density on the Future Land Use Map. Based on the project description, staff find that the use as a water treatment facility as part of the Aquatics Center is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3) There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The Aquatic Center was designed and built in 1958, with subsequent rebuilding and refurbishing affected by the original location of the facility. Prior to 1990, the setback required from the OHWE of the pond was 25 ft and conformed at the time. Changes to the water body setbacks have reduced expansion opportunities for existing structures that conformed when built. Page 11 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 4 Due to the existing subgrade piping infrastructure of the 3 water bodies that the current Pump Room serves, the footprint of the existing outdated pump room must remain in its current location. ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes, Criteria met. The variance is due to the size of the existing building and proximity to a holding pond, which was not created by the applicant. The Existing conditions, including the existing pools, existing Pump Room, existing West 64th street, existing grading between the pools and West 64th street, existing trees within a sloped area, and limiting disturbance of – all factors are unique to the existing property conditions, and are not created by the landowner. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Pump Room is primarily visible from West 64th street, which serves as an access road between parking lots at Rosland Park and doesn’t have any direct views to neighboring R-1 / single family properties. From further away, the Pump Room is visible from Highway 62 and Valley View Road, however, perception of the proximity change to the pond is minimal at 8 ft. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of a variance from Edina City Code Section 36-1268 to allow for an 11.5 ft variance from Section 36-1268, requiring a 50 ft setback from the ordinary high-water elevation, (OHWL), of a naturally occurring lake, pond or stream to allow a setback of 38.5 ft for a proposed pump room facility replacement. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal for the pump room expansion is reasonable. The use is associated with a permitted use in the Single dwelling Unit District with the Aquatic Center, and all its necessary parts are compatible with uses in the Single Dwelling Unit District. 2. The use is consistent with the Future Land Use designation for Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The variance is needed due to the functionally obsolete size of the existing building built in 1958, constructed under different setback requirements, which are current hold-over conditions that were not created by the applicant on behalf or the Aquatic Center. 4. The variance to allow the expansion of the proposed pump house space will not alter the essential character of the locality. The new pump house with the upper pavilion will enhance the user experience of the center and address current operational deficiencies, with minimal intrusion into setback. Page 12 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 5 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The survey, plans and engineering submissions attached to this staff report dated February 21, 2025. 2. Watershed District approval. 3. Conformance with the City Engineer’s building permit review. 4. Conformance with tree plan as part of building permit. Deadline for a City decision: April 23, 2025. Page 13 of 492 420 North 5th Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.758.4000 HGA.COM s March 6, 2025 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement Request for Variance HGA Commission Number 3857-012-07 Dear Mr. Teague, On behalf of our client, The City of Edina, we are requesting a zoning variance to Edina Code of Ordinances section 36-1268 – Setbacks from naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, for a pump room replacement at the Edina Aquatics Center located in Rosland Park. This ordinance requires a minimum 50’-0” setback from ordinary high-water elevation (OHWL). Due to the physical site limitations, as well as the location of existing aquatics facility infrastructure, the project is requesting a variance to this setback to reduce it to 38’-6” from addition footprint to OHWL. Because the Swimming Pond is not perpendicular to our building, the average setback is closer to 42’-0”, but at our pinch point we’re at 38’-6” from OHWL. See sheet A021 and it’s enlarged in the Variance request pdf (page 8 & 9). We anticipate this variance Request will be reviewed at the Planning Commission Meeting on March 26th, 2025. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Certificate of Title No. 269389) Land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: The South 520.42 feet of the North 1040.85 feet of the following described property: All that part of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, Range 24, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the North line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, 329 feet West of the West line of Brookview Avenue as platted in Peacedale Acres which point is the Southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Bourgeois Addition; thence running Southeasterly to a point in the Westerly right of way line of Valley View Road, which point is 97.3 feet North as measured at right angles from the South line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence running Southeasterly along the Westerly right of way line of Valley View Road to the South line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and there terminating. Page 14 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement March 6th, 2025 Page 2 Project Description The Edina Aquatic Center opened in 1958 and celebrated its 67th year of operation in 2024. The facility consists of an admissions area, concession stand, bathhouse and four separate bodies of water, including an 8 lane 50-meter pool, a zero-depth entry pool, a plunge pool and a surf simulator. It is a regional destination with visitors from the twin cities, greater Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Currently, the facility sees approximately 85,000 visitors a year during an eleven-week season. In Summer of 2022, HGA Architects and Engineers were contracted by the City of Edina to perform an existing conditions assessment of the Aquatic Center Pump Room that serves the Edina Aquatics Center located at 4300 West 66th Street. The report that followed outlined several critical deficiencies relative to the physical structure, mechanical and electrical systems, and operational needs of the 1950’s era Pump Room, ultimately deeming it in poor physical condition and operationally outdated. The original Pump Room has undergone a handful smaller renovations and additions over the decades, but years of exposure to corrosive gases due mainly to the use of liquid muriatic acid, and a very limiting head room height in the range of about 8’-0” to 9’-6” makes the space functionally unsuitable for modern equipment. In the Fall of 2022 HGA Architects and Engineers were contracted by the City of Edina to conduct a concept design, which proposed multiple options for the replacement of the existing Pump Room facility. A direction was selected and in April of 2023 HGA and the City of Edina initiated Schematic design of the preferred direction. Design development was completed in late September 2023. Construction Documents for the project began in November 2024. The proposed Pump Room replacement facility is located to the North of the original Pump Room, situated between the original Pump Room and West 64th street. The proposed facility includes a filtration room, appropriately sized to serve the needs of the 3 bodies of water that the original filtration room currently serves. The new filtration room also provides appropriate vertical clearances for the pool filters (11’-8” clearance from floor to ceiling). In addition to the filtration room, the first floor of the facility provides a separated pool boiler room, two new chemical storage spaces, including a rated hazardous room for chlorine tablet storage, a loading dock, and storage to support the facilities operation. The pool deck level of the proposed project includes a patron pavilion dedicated to elevating the user experience as well as providing much needed off season deck storage. It will also provide additional areas of shade for patrons. The narrative that follows provides additional explanation for the variance request. Page 15 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement March 6th, 2025 Page 3 Proposed Zoning Code Variance Narrative: City of Edina Zoning Code of Ordinances section 36-1268 requires that all principal and accessory structures shall maintain a minimum setback of 50 feet from the ordinary high-water elevation of naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams. Due to the physical site limitations, as well as the location of existing aquatics facility infrastructure, the project is requesting a variance to this setback which would allow the new Pump Room to be located closer than the required 50’ setback to Swimming pool pond; specifically, with an ‘average’ of about 42’-0” setback from the OHWL, and 38’-6” at its greatest pinch point. • West 64th street runs along the shoreline of swimming pool pond, limiting the available site for the proposed replacement facility. • The physical condition of the existing Pump Room is at the end of its service life and in addition, does not meet the operational requirements of the 3 bodies of water it serves. • Due to the existing subgrade piping infrastructure of the 3 water bodies that the current Pump Room serves, the footprint of the existing outdated pump room must remain in its current location. • The seasonal nature of the facility requires a phased approach, requiring the existing Pump Room to remain operational during the construction of the replacement facility. • The first floor of the Pump Room is proposed to be located at an ‘average’ of 42’-0” setback from the swimming pool pond ordinary high-water elevation (OHWL) of 862.9; with its greatest pinch-point at 38’-6” setback from OHWL. This location provides for the minimum required usable space within the pumproom to meet the operational requirements and physical requirements of the pump room equipment, while providing the greatest possible setback from the ordinary high-water elevation, as well as from west 64th street. • The pool deck level aligns with the existing pool deck and accommodates a patron pavilion dedicated to elevating the user experience as well as providing much needed off season deck storage. The positioning of this structure is more flexible than the pump room below and has been located with an approximate average 50’-0” from the swimming pool pond ordinary high-water elevation of 862.9 to minimize the massing of the overall facility, acknowledge the required setback, and provide a more human scaled amenity to pool patrons. • The reduction of the massing by locating the pavilion as described above effectively uses the floor level of the pavilion as an extension of the pool deck terrace, keeping the north expression of the Edina aquatics center in context with the overall facility. • Because the addition is required for functionality, but our team has tried to remain sensitive to the required 50’-0” setback, especially at the pool deck level, we believe our request is still in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. West 64th street is also already within the 50’-0” setback, so we are not disturbing or developing existing green space any closer to the pond than has already been developed. Page 16 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement February 21st, 2025 Page 4 developing existing green space any closer to the pond than has already been developed. •The project is also required to meet Nine Mile Creek review & approval and will remove a small area of paved parking south of West 64th street and replace it with new green infrastructure – a new BMP Filtration Basin. Because the project is making overall stormwater improvements and adding green infrastructure, we believe this project and resulting variance request is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. •This project aims to keep the Aquatic Center functional and operating as an amenity for the community for many decades to come. The Pump Room needs to grow to accommodate modern equipment, piping, and HVAC. For this reason, we believe the variance request is ‘reasonable’ even if not maintaining the 50’-0” setback at the Pump Room level. •Existing conditions, including the existing pools, existing Pump Room, existing West 64th street, existing grading between the pools and West 64th street, existing trees within this sloped area that we are trying to limit disturbance of – all of these factors are unique to this property, and for the most part are not created by the landowner. The landowner wants to maintain and improve this community amenity. •This variance request does reduce the required setback from the OHWL, but we believe it will not negatively alter the essential character of the locality. o Our proposed project will remove the faux stone finish currently at the existing Pump Room and replace it with an attractive and durable polished burnished block, with a clear anti-graffiti coating. The existing bath house also has CMU block finish, tying the addition more closely to existing architecture on this same site. o The mass-timber structure and cedar siding finish of the cabanas above will demonstrate Edina’s interest in reducing embodied carbon in projects and promoting sustainable design. o The Pump Room is primarily visible from West 64th street, which serves as an access road between parking lots at Rosland Park and doesn’t have any direct views to neighboring R-1 / single family properties. From further away, the Pump Room is visible from Highway 62 and Valley View Road, but this average distance of being 8 feet closer to the swimming pool pond will be barely perceptible from these far-off distances. Sincerely, Nancy Blankfard, FAIA, LEED AP Vice President Principal Page 17 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement March 6th, 2025 Page 5 Attachment(s) Refer to list of submitted documents below Variance Request Attachments The following is a list of attached documents for the variance request of the proposed Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement. All documents provided by HGA unless noted otherwise: 1. Variance Application, provided by City of Edina 2. Application Fee, understood to be waived since City of Edina is also applicant 3. Variance Application Package 1) Existing Context Plan 2) Property Boundary 3) Existing Site Plan with proposed Pump Room replacement 4) Existing Site Images 5) Existing Conditions Images (3 pages) 6) Plan Set Materials a. Architectural Drawings i. A021 – SITE PLAN – PLANNING VARIANCE – PUMP ROOM LEVEL (scaled) ii. A021 – ENLARGED SITE PLAN – PUMP ROOM LEVEL (not to scale) iii. A022 – SITE PLAN – PLANNING VARIANCE – POOL DECK LEVEL (scaled) iv. A022 – ENLARGED SITE PLAN – POOL DECK LEVEL (not to scale) v. A012 – DESIGN VIEWS vi. Materials Palette vii. A100 – DEMOLITION PLANS viii. A200 – FLOOR PLANS ix. A400 – EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDINGS SECTIONS x. Section Comparison – Proposed vs. Existing b. Aquatics Drawings i. AQ310 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN ii. AQ311 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN iii. AQ322 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM SECTIONS iv. AQ323 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM SECTIONS c. Civil & Landscape Drawings i. C100 – EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ii. C200 – SITE DEMOLITION PLAN iii. C300 – SITE LAYOUT AND SURFACING PLAN iv. C400– SITE GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN v. C401 – FILTRATION BASIN PLAN vi. L100 – TREE PROTECTION PLAN vii. L120 – TREE PROTECTION DETAILS viii. L200 – LANDSCAPE PLAN d. Survey, provided by Loucks, and Bolton & Menk i. Topographic Survey – overall site – reference – 10/19/16 ii. Topographic Survey – Signed 08.01.2023 Page 18 of 492 SWIMMING POOL POND CROSSTOWN HWY 62 LAKE CORNELIA (S) LAKE CORNELIA (N) ROSLAND PARK EDINA AQUATICS CENTER WEST 66TH STREET CROSSTOWN HWY 62 WEST 64TH STREET VALLEY VIEW ROAD PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT LOCATION CONTEXT PLAN EDINA AQUATICS CENTER - PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT - VARIANCE REQUEST Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 19 of 492 PLUNGE POOL W E S T 6 4 T H S T R E E T SWIMMING POOL POND PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT 50-METER POOL SPLASH PAD EXISTING PUMP ROOM SITE PLAN EDINA AQUATICS CENTER - PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT - VARIANCE REQUEST 50-FLOWRIDER POOL Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 20 of 492 PLUNGE POOL W E S T 6 4 T H S T R E E T SWIMMING POOL POND PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT 50-METER POOL SPLASH PAD EXISTING PUMP ROOM SITE PLAN EDINA AQUATICS CENTER - PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT - VARIANCE REQUEST 50-FLOWRIDER POOL Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 21 of 492 EXISTING PUMPROOM NORTH FACADESWIMMING POOL POND LOOKING NORTH FROM POOL DECK PUMP ROOM SITE - NORTHBOUND WEST 64TH STREET PUMP ROOM SITE - SOUTHBOUND WEST 64TH STREET SITE IMAGES EDINA AQUATICS CENTER - PUMP ROOM REPLACEMENT - VARIANCE REQUEST Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 22 of 492 2/21/2025 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 23 of 492 2/21/2025 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS GLACIAL WHITE, POLISHED GLACIAL WHITE, POLISHED PLATINUM, POLISHED NUTMEG, POLISHED Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 24 of 492 2/21/2025 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS GLACIAL WHITE, POLISHED GLACIAL WHITE, POLISHED PLATINUM, POLISHED NUTMEG, POLISHED Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 25 of 492 880881879 8 6 5 8 6 5 882 8 8 2 881 882882881882882882 882880885885880880 881 881 879 878 880 8 7 7 8 7 6 876 880875870881879878877876874873872871869868 867866880875870869868867870881 879 878 877 876 874 873 872 880 875 8 8 4 883 8828828 8 2 8 8 1 879 8 7 8 8 7 7 876 880 877 876 874 873 872 871 869 868 8 6 7 8 6 6 8 7 5 870 8 8 4 883 8 8 2 8 8 1 8858 8 0 8 8 0 8 7 5 882 8 8 1 879 878 877876874 873 872 871 875 870 8 7 8 PER MAPPING)(APPROX LOC 8"SANPER MAPPING) (APPROX LOC 6"SAN P E R M A P P I N G ) (A P P R O X L O C 6 "S A N PER MAPPINGAPPROX LOC GASPER CO MARKINGS APPROX LOC ELE P E R C O M A R K I N G S A P P R O X L O C E L E PER CO MARKINGS APPROX LOC ELE 6 4 T H S T R E E T W .9" DIPP O N D B I T U M I N O US (T Y P )N O P A R K IN G 8 6 6 .6ST-3 8 6 2 .9 C O N T O U R WO OD PO STS CO N ST EPS, RA ILING & CO N RETWA LL CO N STEPS &BLOC K RE TWA LL ED G E OF WATE R LO CATED 202 3 JUL 24 ELEV . = ±86 2.2 FT .EMER GE CY SHUT OFF AT TACHED TOBLDG RIP RAP COLUMN (TYP) OVERHANG SUPPORT OTHER SIDE OF RET. WALL REST OF BLDG? FENCE SHOTS? (APPROX LOC 6"WM) (APPROX LOC 6"WMPER MAPPING)(APPROX LOC 4"WMPER MAPPING)(A P P R O X L O C 6 "W M P E R M A P P IN G )(APPROX LOC 4"WMPER MAPPING)(APPROX LOC 4"WMPER MAPPING)(A P P R O X L O C 4 "W M P E R M A P P IN G )(APPROX LOC 6"WM) (APPROX LOC 4"W M PER MAPPING) NEW ADDITION POOL DECK FFE=881.8 NEW POOL FFE=868.55 E O E O 3 5 6 7 6 V E N T 3 5 6 7 5 V E N T IN V = R IM =8 6 8 .1 1 R IM =8 7 1 .8 6 S M H IN V =R IM =8 7 2 .1 8FF=871.20IN V E LE V =8 6 3 .0 2 8 7 5 875 870 873 870 870 8 6 3 8 6 3 8 6 3 8 7 0 UP DN TRANSFORMER PAD AND NEW ACCESS WALK / STAIRS / LANDING CONC FIN-9 BMP SEE CIVIL BITUMINOUS, SEE CIVIL EXTEND NEW CONCRETE WALK TO STREET MET FAB-11 T EXG FENCE FNC-1 GATE50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"45'-8"38'-6 1/8"8 6 2 .9 C O N T O U R 7'-2 7/8"HGA NO: DATE: AQUATICS CONSULTANT USAQUATICS 5603 US-12 #2 DELANO, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APRIL 18, 2025 3857-012-07 EDINA AQUATICS CENTER 4300 W 66TH ST EDINA, MN 55435 2/21/2025 9:44:33 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/A23-Edina Aquatics Center Pump Room Replacement Design-385701202.rvt A021 SITE PLAN - PLANNING VARIANCE - PUMP ROOM LEVEL Author1" = 20'-0"1 SITE PLAN - PLANNING VARIANCE - PUMP ROOM LEVEL Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 26 of 492 Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 27 of 492 880881879 8 6 5 8 6 5 882 8 8 2 881 882882881882882882 882880885885880880 881 881 879 878 880 8 7 7 8 7 6 876 880875870881879878877876874873872871869868 867866880875870869868867870881 879 878 877 876 874 873 872 880 875 8 8 4 883 8828828 8 2 8 8 1 879 8 7 8 8 7 7 876 880 877 876 874 873 872 871 869 868 8 6 7 8 6 6 8 7 5 870 8 8 4 883 8 8 2 8 8 1 8858 8 0 8 8 0 8 7 5 882 8 8 1 879 878 877876874 873 872 871 875 870 8 7 8 PER MAPPING)(APPROX LOC 8"SANPER MAPPING) (APPROX LOC 6"SAN P E R M A P P I N G ) (A P P R O X L O C 6 "S A N PER MAPPINGAPPROX LOC GASPER CO MARKINGS APPROX LOC ELE P E R C O M A R K I N G S A P P R O X L O C E L E PER CO MARKINGS APPROX LOC ELE 6 4 T H S T R E E T W .9" DIPP O N D B I T U M I N O US (T Y P )N O P A R K IN G 8 6 6 .6ST-3 8 6 2 .9 C O N T O U R WO OD PO STS CO N ST EPS, RA ILING & CO N RET WA LL ED G E OF WATE R LO CATED 202 3 JUL 24 ELEV . = ±86 2.2 FT .EMER GE CY SHUT OF F AT TACHED TOBLDG RI P RAP COLUMN (TYP) OVERHANG SUPPORT OTHER SIDE OF RET. WALL REST OF BLDG? FENCE SHOTS? (APPROX LOC 6"WM) (APPROX LOC 6"WMPER MAPPING)(APPROX LOC 4"WMPER MAPPING)(A P P R O X L O C 6 "W M P E R M A P P IN G )(APPROX LOC 4"WMPER MAPPING)(APPROX LOC 4"WMPER MAPPING)(A P P R O X L O C 4 "W M P E R M A P P IN G )(APPROX LOC 6"WM) (APPROX LOC 4"W M PER MAPPING) NEW ADDITION POOL DECK FFE=881.8 NEW POOL FFE=868.55 E O E O 3 5 6 7 6 V E N T 3 5 6 7 5 V E N T IN V = R IM =8 6 8 .1 1 R IM =8 7 1 .8 6 S M H IN V =R IM =8 7 2 .1 8FF=871.20IN V E LE V =8 6 3 .0 2 8 7 5 875 870 873 870 870 8 6 3 8 6 3 8 63 8 7 0 DN DN TRANSFORMER PAD AND NEW ACCESS WALK / STAIRS / LANDING CONC FIN-9 BMP SEE CIVIL GUTTER BITUMINOUS, SEE CIVIL CONC FIN-9 NEW POOL DECK SURGE TANK BELOW LOCATE SUBSURFACE PIPING BEFORE EXCAVATING FOR FOOTINGS EXTEND NEW CONCRETE WALK TO STREET MET FAB-11 T EMERGENCY SWITCHES AND PUMP CONTROLS IN NEW CMU WALL 1 1/2" HYDRANT AND 3/4" HOSE BIB IN NEW CMU WALL EXG FENCE FNC-1 GATE FNC-1JOIN EXG FENCE 15'-4"55'-4" (11'-10" ON SITE) 11'-7"4'-1"32'-10"(15'-4" ON SITE)15'-1"EXISTING FENCING TO REMAIN 50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"8 6 2 .9 C O N T O U R 7'-2 7/8"47'-6 3/8"54'-3 3/4"HGA NO: DATE: AQUATICS CONSULTANT USAQUATICS 5603 US-12 #2 DELANO, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APRIL 18, 2025 3857-012-07 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EDINA AQUATICS CENTER 4300 W 66TH ST EDINA, MN 55435 2/21/2025 10:36:43 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/A23-Edina Aquatics Center Pump Room Replacement Design-385701202.rvt A022 SITE PLAN - PLANNING VARIANCE AuthorAPRIL 18, 2025 1" = 20'-0"1 SITE PLAN - PLANNING VARIANCE Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 28 of 492 Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 29 of 492 HGA NO: DATE: AQUATICS CONSULTANT USAQUATICS 5603 US-12 #2 DELANO, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APRIL 18, 2025 3857-012-07 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EDINA AQUATICS CENTER 4300 W 66TH ST EDINA, MN 55435 2/13/2025 2:22:38 PM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/A23-Edina Aquatics Center Pump Room Replacement Design-385701202.rvt A012 DESIGN VIEWS AuthorAPRIL 18, 2025 BIRDSEYE VIEW - FOR REFERENCE ONLY POOL DECK VIEW LOOKING WEST - FOR REFERENCE ONLY POOL DECK VIEW WITH CABANAS OPEN - FOR REFERENCE ONLY POOL DECK VIEW WITH CABANAS OPEN - FOR REFERENCE ONLY ROAD VIEW LOOKING WEST - FOR REFERENCE ONLY ROAD VIEW LOOKING EAST - FOR REFERENCE ONLY Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 30 of 492 2/21/2025 38 MATERIALS AND COLOR PALETTE ROOF & WALL FRAMES POLISHED, BURNISHED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CEDAR SIDING STAINLESS STEEL GUARDRAILS ALASKAN YELLOW CEDAR STRUCTURE DORIAN GRAYDARK BRONZEZINC GRAYMEDIUM BRONZE Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 31 of 492 DN A. COORDINATE EXTENT OF DEMOLITION WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW WORK. B. REMOVE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FLOOR FINISHES, WALLS, CEILINGS, WALL BASE, AND OTHER EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED OR REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. C. REMOVE WALLS INCLUDING WALL MATERIALS INCLUDING INTEGRAL BASES, DOORS, DOOR FRAMES AND ASSOCIATED HARDWARE AND THRESHOLDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. D. REMOVE PARTITIONS COMPLETELY TO UNDERSIDE OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS ABOVE AND TO TOP OF FLOOR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AT BASE. DO NOT LEAVE SECTIONS OR MATERIALS OF WALL ASSEMBLIES IN PLACE. E. AT SIDES OF WALLS, THAT ABUT WALLS TO REMAIN, CUT BACK AT LEAST 1 INCH (25 MM) BEYOND FACE OF FINISH OF WALL TO REMAIN TO FACILITATE SUBSEQUENT PATCHING AND NEW CONSTRUCTION. F. COMPLETELY REMOVE FINISHES, SUBBASE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURAL FRAMING MATERIALS TO LINES INDICATED OR REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK. G. EXISTING ITEMS TO BE SALVAGED FOR REUSE IN NEW WORK: A. B. H. EXISTING ITEMS TO BE SALVAGED FOR DELIVERY TO OWNER: A. B. I. EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES AND MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ARE TO REMAIN, UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. J. RELOCATE EXISTING WORK SERVING OCCUPIED PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SERVICE TO OCCUPIED AREAS AND TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. K. REMOVE AND CAP PORTIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE DEMOLISHED AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK, INCLUDING SURFACE-MOUNTED ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, DEVICES AND LIGHT FIXTURES; RADIATORS, RADIATOR COVERS; PLUMBING FIXTURES AND ASSOCIATED PIPING. L. REMOVE CEILINGS INDICATED TO BE DEMOLISHED INCLUDING INTEGRAL HANGERS, SUPPORTS, ANCHORS AND MATERIALS OR ASSEMBLIES ATTACHED TO CEILING CONSTRUCTION. M. REMOVE SUSPENDED CEILINGS TO UNDERSIDE OF STRUCTURE OR ORIGINAL PLASTER OR GYPSUM BOARD CEILING SURFACES. N. MAINTAIN EGRESS FROM EXISTING OCCUPIED SPACES AND SURROUNDING BUILDING AREAS AS INDICATED AND AS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. MAINTAIN EGRESS FROM EXISTING OCCUPIED SPACES AND SURROUNDING BUILDING AREAS AS INDICATED AND AS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. O. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN AREA OF WORK, IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. P. COORDINATE UTILITY INTERRUPTIONS WITH OWNER. PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS WRITTEN NOTICE TO OWNER BEFORE UTILITY INTERRUPTIONS OBTAIN OWNER'S WRITTEN APPROVAL OF INTERRUPTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING. Q. COORDINATE OPERATIONS THAT MAY RESULT IN HIGH LEVELS OF NOISE AND VIBRATION, ODORS, OR OTHER DISRUPTIONS TO OCCUPANCY WITH OWNER. OBTAIN OWNER'S WRITTEN PERMISSION BEFORE PROCEEDING. R. PROVIDE TEMPORARY BARRIERS AND ENCLOSURES AS REQUIRED TO PROTECT MATERIALS AND PEOPLE. PREVENT DUST, FUMES, AND ODORS FROM ENTERING OCCUPIED AREAS. MAINTAIN AND RELOCATE TEMPORARY BARRIERS AND ENCLOSURES AS REQUIRED BY THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK. REMOVE TEMPORARY BARRIERS AND ENCLOSURES AT COMPLETION OF WORK. S. PRIOR TO STARTING DEMOLITION, VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. COORDINATE EXTENT OF DEMOLITION WORK AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN WITH NEW WORK. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES. T. REFER TO DISCIPLINE-SPECIFIC DRAWINGS FOR RELATED FIRE SUPPRESSION, PLUMBING, HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING, ELECTRICAL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY SYSTEM DEMOLITION WORK. GENERAL NOTES - DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN LEGEND SEE A010 FOR ALL GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS 1 2 (E)TWO HOUR RATED (E) ONE HOUR RATED (E) CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED TEMPORARY BARRIER (E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN TYPE OF ASSEMBLY DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED B S SPFIRE BARRIER SMOKE BARRIER SMOKE PARTITIONS ST RESIST PASSAGE OF SMOKE E EXISTING AND RATED P FIRE PARTITION W FIRE WALL 4 3 THREE HOUR RATED FOUR HOUR RATED 0 ZERO HOUR REMOVE CONC SLAB, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS B 1 1 D 3 3 4 4 C E 2 2 A D6D4 D3D11 NOTE: SEE ARCH SITE PLAN AND AQUATICS DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL POOL DECK DEMO NOTESD4D4 D4 D4B B 1 1 D D 3 3 4 4 C C E E 2 212'-1"10'-7"11'-10"A A D11D7D7D7D10 D5 D5 D5 D8D2 D2D1 D1 D13 D13 D14 D11 D15 D15D17D7 D15 D16 D17D2 D2 SEE CIVIL FOR SITE NOTES HGA NO: DATE: AQUATICS CONSULTANT USAQUATICS 5603 US-12 #2 DELANO, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APRIL 18, 2025 3857-012-07 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EDINA AQUATICS CENTER 4300 W 66TH ST EDINA, MN 55435 2/13/2025 2:44:13 PM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/A23-Edina Aquatics Center Pump Room Replacement Design-385701202.rvt A100 DEMOLITION PLANS AuthorAPRIL 18, 2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 DEMOLITION PLAN - POOL DECK 1/8" = 1'-0"2 DEMOLITION PLAN - NEW BELOW POOL LEVEL EXG PUMP ROOM / POOL WALL SECTION - FOR REFERENCE KEYNOTES #DESCRIPTION D1 REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISH IN THIS AREA IN PREPARATION FOR NEW FINISH AS SCHEDULED D2 REMOVE FAUX STONE WALL CLADDING, ANCHORAGE AND CAVITY. PREP BACKUP WALL FOR NEW CAVITY WALL, INSUL AND FINISH D3 DEMO EXISTING POOL DECK D4 REMOVE EXISTING FENCE D5 DEMO EXISTING CONCRETE STAIRS, LANDINGS AND COMPONENTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY D6 REMOVE EXISTING LIFT STATION COMPONENTS AND RELOCATE CONNECTS PER AQUATICS DRAWINGS. PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONCRETE POOL DECK TO MATCH ADJACENT D7 DEMO EXISTING DOOR AND FRAME AND PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW FRAME AND DOOR D8 DEMO EXG LOADING DOCK TO EXTENTS SHOWN D10 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER TO NEW LOCATION. DEMO EXISTING CONCRETE PAD IN ITS ENTIRETY D11 REMOVE AND REFURBISH EXG EQUIPMENT PER POOL CONSULTANT NARRATIVE. PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURE IN PLACE D13 EXG SUMP PUMP D14 CREATE NEW OPENING IN EXG CONCRETE WALL. PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW DOOR. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR REQUIREMENTS D15 REMOVE EXG WALL AND CEILING FINISH IN THIS AREA. CLEAN AND PREP SURFACES FOR NEW FINISH D16 CREATE NEW OPENING IN EXG CONCRETE WALL. PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW LOUVER. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR REQUIREMENTS D17 DEMO EXG LOUVERS AND PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW LOUVER Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 32 of 492 DN DN DN ALIGN DN DN DN UP DN A. ALL INTERIOR PARTITIONS SHALL BE "A3_" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. B. PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF PARTITION TYPE AND DO NOT INCLUDE APPLIED FINISHES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PLAN DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS "HOLD" OR "CLEAR" DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF APPLIED FINISH. C. INSTALL WORK STRAIGHT, PLUMB, LEVEL, SQUARE, AND TRUE, IN PROPER ALIGNMENT. D. FLATNESS: LEVEL FLOORS TO TRUE PLANE WITHIN 1/4 INCH (6 MM) IN 10'-0" (3 M) WHEN TESTED BY TEN FOOT (3 M) STRAIGHTEDGE PLACED ANYWHERE ON FLOOR IN ANY DIRECTION. E. COORDINATE FURNITURE-RELATED ELECTRICAL LAYOUT WITH FURNITURE VENDOR. F. WHERE HANDRAILS, GRAB BARS, CABINETS, WALL-MOUNTED DOOR STOPS, OR OTHER WALL-HUNG ITEMS ARE ATTACHED TO PARTITIONS, INSTALL BACKER PLATES [OR WOOD BLOCKING ] ACCURATELY POSITIONED AND FIRMLY SECURED TO METAL STUDS, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH BACKER PLATES OR BLOCKING ARE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. G. WHERE NEW WORK ABUTS, ALIGNS OR ADJOINS EXISTING MATERIALS, MAKE SMOOTH AND EVEN TRANSITION AND ELIMINATE EVIDENCE OF PATCHING AND REFINISHING. FINISH NEW WORK TO MATCH ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SURFACES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. CLOSE AND PATCH HOLES AND OPENINGS IN EXISTING FLOOR, WALL AND CEILING WHICH EXIST OR RESULT FROM DEMOLITION OR ALTERATION WORK TO MATCH ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SURFACES. I. PRIOR TO CONCEALMENT OF FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIALS BY OTHER WORK, PATCH AND REPAIR AREAS OF REMOVED OR DAMAGED APPLIED FIREPROOFING. COMPLETE PATCHING AND REPAIR TO MAINTAIN EXISTING FIRE-RESISTANCE DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIREPROOFING MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONDITIONS OF EXPOSURE AND INTENDED USE. COORDINATE TESTING AND INSPECTION OF ASSEMBLIES AS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. J. PROVIDE FIRESTOPPING OF PENETRATIONS AND VOIDS THROUGH FIRE-RATED WALL, FLOOR AND PARTITION ASSEMBLIES [AND ROOF] INCLUDING EMPTY OPENINGS AND OPENINGS CONTAINING CABLES, PIPES, DUCTS, CONDUIT AND OTHER ELEMENTS. K. AT SOUND-RATED PARTITION WALLS, PROVIDE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF ACOUSTICAL SEALANT AT JUNCTURE OF BOTH FACES OF RUNNERS OR PLATES WITH FLOOR AND CEILING CONSTRUCTION, AND WHEREVER GYPSUM BOARD ABUTS DISSIMILAR MATERIALS. • AT OPENINGS AND CUTOUTS, FILL OPEN SPACES BETWEEN GYPSUM BOARD AND FIXTURES, CABINETS, DUCTS AND OTHER FLUSH OR PENETRATING ITEMS, WITH CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT. • SEAL SIDES AND BACKS OF ELECTRICAL BOXES TO COMPLETELY CLOSE OFF OPENINGS AND JOINTS. GENERAL NOTES - FLOOR PLAN CONSTRUCTION PLAN LEGEND SEE A010 FOR ALL GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS (N) CONSTRUCTION (E) CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN TYPE OF ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY RATING XXXXX TACTILE EXIT SIGNAGE INTERIOR PARTITION TAG SEE PARTITION SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DOOR TAG SEE DOOR SCHEDULE AND LEGEND FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WINDOW TAG SEE DOOR SCHEDULE AND LEGEND FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION B S SPFIRE BARRIER SMOKE BARRIER SMOKE PARTITIONS ST RESIST PASSAGE OF SMOKE E EXISTING AND RATED P FIRE PARTITION W FIRE WALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 1 4 2 3 TWO HOUR RATED ONE HOUR RATED THREE HOUR RATED FOUR HOUR RATED 0 ZERO HOUR A400 3 A400 1 A400 4 A400 2 B B 1 1 D D 3 3 4 4 C C E E 2 2 5 5 11 A400 10 A400 CABANA 104 CABANA 103 CABANA 102 CABANA 101 23'-4"VIF12'-1"VIF10'-7"VIF11'-10"VIF 12'-9" VIF 9'-11" VIF 30'-7" A A 22'-1" 8 A400 EXISTING POOL M12a 3 A500 1 A201 1 A402 A400 6 A400 7 FNC-1 EXG FENCE 104A104B103B103A102A102B101B101AA400 12 6 A401 2 A401 A400 9 A400 5 7'-7"13'-5"3'-9 3/8" 12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0" 1 A403 SEE SITE PLAN FOR NEW CONCRETE SLAB UNDER SUNSHADE CANOPY A400 3 A400 1 A400 4 A400 2 B 1 1 D 3 3 4 4 C RECEIVING 007 HEATERS 010 E 2 2 5 5 11 A400 10 A400 871' - 1" 871' - 1" 868' - 8" PH 009 CL2 008 NEW FILTER 006 PIPE CHASE 001 LANDING 005 ELEC 003STORAGE 002 12'-3 1/8"A VIF 12'-9" VIF 9'-11" VIF 30'-7"23'-4"VIF12'-1"VIF10'-7"VIF11'-10"22'-1" 8 A400 SURGE TANK002003 001 004 006 010 008 009 M12a M8a CONC FIN-9 0074 A500 2 A500 1 A500 8'-0" CMU-2 LAYOUT LOCATION 3'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4" 8'-0" 1'-4" 9'-3 3/8" A400 6 WORKBENCH 10'-8" A400 7 SURGE TANK 001B LVR-1 SUMP PIT1 1 1 OPEN TRENCH DRAIN WITH GRATE A610 16'-7 5/8"6'-0"10'-8" ALT STRG 004 CR CR CR CR 4'-10 1/4"6'-0 1/4"9'-4 3/4" 4'-0" 12'-0"12'-0"42'-0"4'-6"10'-0" 6 A401 WORKBENCH CR CR 11'-3 5/8"7'-7 3/4" 14'-8" 3'-0"1'-0"2 A401 1 A403 HGA NO: DATE: AQUATICS CONSULTANT USAQUATICS 5603 US-12 #2 DELANO, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APRIL 18, 2025 3857-012-07 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EDINA AQUATICS CENTER 4300 W 66TH ST EDINA, MN 55435 2/21/2025 10:09:39 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/A23-Edina Aquatics Center Pump Room Replacement Design-385701202.rvt A200 FLOOR PLANS AuthorAPRIL 18, 2025KEYNOTES #DESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - POOL LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 33 of 492 ALIGN A. ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING FLOORS ARE BASED ON SURVEY INFORMATION AND\OR AS-BUILT DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. THE SURVEY DATA MAY NOT BE COMPLETE AND THE ACTUAL EXISTING ELEVATIONS MAY VARY IN DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COORDINATED BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE MATCHING FLOOR ELEVATIONS WHERE REQUIRED. GENERAL NOTES - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" B EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" D CE 11 A400 A 8 A400 CONC FIN-9 CONC FIN-20 CMU-2 CMU-2 LVR-1 CONC FIN-9 MET RAIL-2 DEC RAIL-3WD FAB-1 WD FAB-2 WD-3 WD-2 SMR-1 CONC FIN-20 LIGHT FIXTURE CMU-2 RECESSED LVR-1 3 A402 868.67 2 A401 1 A403 BUILDING BUILDING WALL BEYOND WALL WALL T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" B DC E 11 A400 A 8 A400 WD FAB-2 WD-3SMR-1 CMU-3 WD-2 WD FAB-1 ALUM GUTTER ALUM DOWNSPOUT TO DECK DRAIN FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING7'-0"3 A402 LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" 3 42 5 10 A400 CONC FIN-20 CMU-2 DEC RAIL-2 DEC RAIL-3 WD FAB-2 WD-3 WD-2 SMR-1 WD-1 CMU-3 1 A402 LIGHT FIXTURE SURGE TANK VENTS 2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"3'-4" 3'-4" 6'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 5'-4 3/8"EXTEND DOUBLE WYTHE MASONRY TO BELOW GRADE A MIN OF 4" AND SWITCH TO SINGLE WYTHE WHERE EXTERIOR FOUNDATION INSULATION WON'T BE VISIBLE 6 A401 SOUTH END OF BUILDING BELOW LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" 34 25 10 A400 CONC FIN-20 CMU-2 MET RAIL-2 DEC RAIL-3 WD FAB-2 WD-3 WD-2 SMR-1 CD-1 CMU-3 WD-1 LIGHT FIXTURE ALUM COVER PLATE OVER SLIDE EMERGENCY SWITCHES AND PUMP CONTROLS 1 1/2" HYDRANT AND 3/4" HOSE BIB IN ALUM PLATE COVER 13'-1 1/4"868' - 8" 881.8' 868.5' 865.9' 865.9'865.58'2'-6"LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" 34 25 CMU-3 WD-2 SLATS DEC RAIL-3 CONC FIN-20 INSUL-1 CM1 28'-4"8 1/2"11'-8"13'-4"13'-1 5/8"11'-8"8 1/2"1/4"/ft 1/4"/ft882.0'881.8' 868.67' 8 1/2" THICK SLAB ALLOWS A MIN OF 3" INSULATION AT THE DRAIN AND A 1/4" PER FT SLOPE. THE OTHER OPTION IS TO REDUCE MIN INSUL FROM 3" TO 2 1/2" AND THEN THE SLAB CAN BE 9" LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" D CE DECK 100' -8"POOL LVL. 100' -0" EXIST. LOWER LVL. 89' -6" 11 A400 8 A400 CM1 CM1 3 A402 5 A402 1 A4016 A401 5 A401 LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" 34 25 POOL LVL. 100' -0" DEC RAIL-3 WD-3 WD FAB-1 WD FAB-2 2 A402 6 A402 1 A402 CM1 TOPPING SLAB TO ALIGN WITH EXG HPC-10 SURGE TANK INTERIOR SURFACES 868' - 8" 882.0' = 100'-8" 868.7' = 6 A401 865.8' 8'-11 1/2"11'-8"8 1/2"1/4"/ft 1/4"/ft881' - 6 1/2" LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" B EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" C A CMU-2 LAYOUT LOCATION CONC FIN-20 CMU-3 MET RAIL-28"1 A403 LOWER LEVEL 868' - 8" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 871' - 1" 34 T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" T.O. STRUCT SLAB 881' - 1" 12 32'-6" 4'-9"21'-0"6'-8" 7'-7" HGA NO: DATE: AQUATICS CONSULTANT USAQUATICS 5603 US-12 #2 DELANO, MN 55328 (763) 972-5897 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS APRIL 18, 2025 3857-012-07 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EDINA AQUATICS CENTER 4300 W 66TH ST EDINA, MN 55435 2/21/2025 10:21:58 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/A23-Edina Aquatics Center Pump Room Replacement Design-385701202.rvt A400 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDINGS SECTIONS APRIL 18, 2025 1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"4 EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"11 BUILDING SECTION N/S 1/8" = 1'-0"10 BUILDING SECTION W/E 1/8" = 1'-0"8 BUILDING SECTION N/S1 1/8" = 1'-0"6 ELEVATION - LOADING DOCK LOOKING SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"7 ELEVATION - PUMP ROOM WEST 1/2" = 1'-0"12 CABANAS GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT 1/8" = 1'-0"9 SOUTH ELEVATION - SUNSHADE CANOPY 1/8" = 1'-0"5 WEST ELEVATION - SUNSHADE CANOPY Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 34 of 492 Received 2/21/25 Planning Division Page 35 of 492 COLORAQUATIC PLUMBING LEGENDPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL SUPPLY (SSL, SSM, PSD)COLORPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL RETURN (RIM)FEATURE SUPPLY (PFS, FSS)DRAIN TILE / UNDERDRAIN (WTU)FEATURE RETURN (PFR)WASTE (PPW, WSM)FILTRATION/SANITATION/HEAT/TREAT.(PPT, PFT, TBC)BB11DD3344CCE225AA1AQ3221AQ3242AQ3223AQ3222AQ3241AQ3232AQ323EXPERT AQUATIC DESIGN & CONSULTINGPO BOX 86; 5603 US-12 •DELANO, MN 55328(763) 972-5897 •INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COMHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTNO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.CISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSEPTEMBER 29, 20233857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 554392/13/2025 11:10:14 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/AQUATIC_Edi22D014 Edina_R23_V2.rvtAQ310MECHANICALROOM PLANAJMMECHANICAL ROOM SCHEDULE - RECIRCULATION AND FILTRATIONTYPEQT.DESCRIPTIONMFR.MODELBID414-1 1150NBFG85ER1416-1 5 GreenDrive Variable Frequency Drive, 20 HP, 480 V, 3 Phase, NEMA 12 (IP55)Neptune-Benson - - -Base416-2 1 GreenDrive Variable Frequency Drive, 7.5 HP, 480 V, 3 Phase, NEMA 12 (IP55)Neptune-Benson - - -Base416-3 1 GreenDrive Variable Frequency Drive, 7.5 HP, 480 V, 3 Phase, NEMA 12 (IP55)Neptune-Benson - - -Base447 1 Air Compressor, 2 HP, 120 V, 1 Phase, 15 A, 20 Gal.Ingersoll RandP1.5IU-A9BaseMECHANICAL ROOM SCHEDULE - HEALTH AND SAFETYMARKQT.DESCRIPTIONMFR.MODELCOMMENTSBID507-1 1 Chemical Safety Gloves, Neoprene CoatedRecSupplyDD1027850 Health and Safety - Mech. Room Base507-2 1 Heavy Duty Chemical Apron, 33"x49", 18 mil RecSupplyDD0038750 Health and Safety - Mech. Room Base507-3 1 Heavy Duty Chemical Safety GogglesRecSupplyDD1511750 Health and Safety - Mech. Room Base519 1 State Compliant Signage, Chemical---Per CodeHealth and Safety - Mech. Room BaseVALVE IDENTIFICATIONTYPE CNT. SIZEDESCRIPTION1/4" = 1'-0"AQ310MECHANICAL ROOM1Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 36 of 492 COLORAQUATIC PLUMBING LEGENDPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL SUPPLY (SSL, SSM, PSD)COLORPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL RETURN (RIM)FEATURE SUPPLY (PFS, FSS)DRAIN TILE / UNDERDRAIN (WTU) FEATURE RETURN (PFR)WASTE (PPW, WSM)FILTRATION/SANITATION/HEAT/TREAT.(PPT, PFT, TBC)2AQ3223AQ3221AQ3232AQ323PP2.3411.23PP3.2411.32PP2.2411.22PP1.1411.11PP2.1411.21735-79452.0450PP3.1411.31TUBE SLIDE GROUPBODY SLIDE GROUPPLUNGE RECIRCULATION GROUPLAP RECIRCULATION GROUPACTIVITY FEATURE GROUPACTIVITY RECIRCULATION GROUPEXPERT AQUATIC DESIGN & CONSULTINGPO BOX 86; 5603 US-12 •DELANO, MN 55328(763) 972-5897 •INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COMHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTNO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.CISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSEPTEMBER 29, 20233857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 554392/13/2025 11:10:20 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/AQUATIC_Edi22D014 Edina_R23_V2.rvtAQ311MECHANICALROOM PLANAJMMECHANICAL ROOM SCHEDULE - RECIRCULATION AND FILTRATIONTYPEQT.DESCRIPTIONMFR.MODELBID414-1 1150NBFG85ER1416-1 5 GreenDrive Variable Frequency Drive, 20 HP, 480 V, 3 Phase, NEMA 12 (IP55)Neptune-Benson - - -Base416-2 1 GreenDrive Variable Frequency Drive, 7.5 HP, 480 V, 3 Phase, NEMA 12 (IP55)Neptune-Benson - - -Base416-3 1 GreenDrive Variable Frequency Drive, 7.5 HP, 480 V, 3 Phase, NEMA 12 (IP55)Neptune-Benson - - -Base447 1 Air Compressor, 2 HP, 120 V, 1 Phase, 15 A, 20 Gal.Ingersoll RandP1.5IU-A9BaseMECHANICAL ROOM SCHEDULE - HEALTH AND SAFETYMARKQT.DESCRIPTIONMFR.MODELCOMMENTSBID507-1 1 Chemical Safety Gloves, Neoprene CoatedRecSupplyDD1027850 Health and Safety - Mech. Room Base507-2 1 Heavy Duty Chemical Apron, 33"x49", 18 mil RecSupplyDD0038750 Health and Safety - Mech. Room Base507-3 1 Heavy Duty Chemical Safety GogglesRecSupplyDD1511750 Health and Safety - Mech. Room Base519 1 State Compliant Signage, Chemical---Per CodeHealth and Safety - Mech. Room BaseVALVE IDENTIFICATIONTYPE CNT. SIZEDESCRIPTION1/2" = 1'-0"AQ311MECHANICAL LAYOUT1Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 37 of 492 COLORAQUATIC PLUMBING LEGENDPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL SUPPLY (SSL, SSM, PSD)COLORPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL RETURN (RIM)FEATURE SUPPLY (PFS, FSS)DRAIN TILE / UNDERDRAIN (WTU) FEATURE RETURN (PFR)WASTE (PPW, WSM)FILTRATION/SANITATION/HEAT/TREAT.(PPT, PFT, TBC)NEW BELOW POOL LEVEL87' - 4"POOL GUTTER LIP100' - 0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL89' - 6"DCEDECK8"POOL GUTTER LIP0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL-10' -6"NEW BELOW POOL LEVEL87' - 4"POOL GUTTER LIP100' - 0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL89' - 6"DCEDECK8"POOL GUTTER LIP0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL-10' -6"NEW BELOW POOL LEVEL87' - 4"POOL GUTTER LIP100' - 0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL89' - 6"DCEDECK8"POOL GUTTER LIP0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL-10' -6"EXPERT AQUATIC DESIGN & CONSULTINGPO BOX 86; 5603 US-12 •DELANO, MN 55328(763) 972-5897 •INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COMHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTNO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.CISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSEPTEMBER 29, 20233857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 554392/13/2025 11:10:22 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/AQUATIC_Edi22D014 Edina_R23_V2.rvtAQ322MECHANICALROOM SECTIONSAJMVALVE IDENTIFICATIONTYPE CNT. SIZEDESCRIPTION3/8" = 1'-0"AQ322MECHANICAL ROOM SECTION VIEW 1.113/8" = 1'-0"AQ322MECHANICAL ROOM SECTION VIEW 1.223/8" = 1'-0"AQ322MECHANICAL ROOM SECTION VIEW 1.33Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 38 of 492 COLORAQUATIC PLUMBING LEGENDPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL SUPPLY (SSL, SSM, PSD)COLORPLUMBING SYSTEM (ABB.)POOL RETURN (RIM)FEATURE SUPPLY (PFS, FSS)DRAIN TILE / UNDERDRAIN (WTU) FEATURE RETURN (PFR)WASTE (PPW, WSM)FILTRATION/SANITATION/HEAT/TREAT.(PPT, PFT, TBC)NEW BELOW POOL LEVEL87' - 4"POOL GUTTER LIP100' - 0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL89' - 6"345DECK8"POOL GUTTER LIP0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL-10' -6"NEW BELOW POOL LEVEL87' - 4"POOL GUTTER LIP100' - 0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL89' - 6"34DECK8"POOL GUTTER LIP0"EXG BELOW POOL LEVEL-10' -6"EXPERT AQUATIC DESIGN & CONSULTINGPO BOX 86; 5603 US-12 •DELANO, MN 55328(763) 972-5897 •INFO@USAQUATICSINC.COMHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTNO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINA PUMP ROOM ADDITIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.CISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETDESIGN DEVELOPMENTSEPTEMBER 29, 20233857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 554392/13/2025 11:10:23 AM Autodesk Docs://Edina Aquatics Center_3857-012-02/AQUATIC_Edi22D014 Edina_R23_V2.rvtAQ323MECHANICALROOM SECTIONSAJMVALVE IDENTIFICATIONTYPE CNT. SIZEDESCRIPTION3/8" = 1'-0"AQ323MECHANICAL ROOM SECTION VIEW 2.113/8" = 1'-0"AQ323MECHANICAL ROOM SECTION VIEW 2.22Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 39 of 492 64TH STREET W.MFF=871.20 M >>>> CON TRO L PO IN T # 5 0 0 2N: 1 3 4 4 2 1 . 0 2 6 8 E : 5 1 2 4 2 1 . 3 0 1 9 NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2 8 6 2 . 9 CON TOUR 862.9 CONTOURGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEETNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67>>SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2KEY NOTES:SILT FENCE SEEINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL BLANKETROCK CONSTRUCTION EXITSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSCLCEECBIPSFNOTES:1. SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND.2. SEE SHEET C101 FOR EROSION CONTROL DETAILSSCALE IN FEET01020HGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439C100EROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLANReceived 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 40 of 492 64TH STREET W.PBPPPPMFF=871.20 M BPPP>>>>NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE>>SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2221169944448371010111111FENCE REMOVAL LIMITSFENCE REMOVALLIMITS12KEY NOTESPROTECT EXISTING FEATURESAWCUT PAVEMENTCOORDINATE THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OFTHE WATER SERVICE WITH PLUMBING CONTRACTOR.REMOVE POSTS/BOLLARDSSALVAGE SIGN AND RELOCATE. SEE SHEET C300RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER - SEEELECTRICAL SITE PLANCOORDINATE REMOVAL OF UTILITYREMOVE BOULDERREMOVE FENCEREMOVE CONCRETE STEPS AND RETAINING WALLSEE ARCH. SHEET A100 FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITIONINFORMATION AND EXTENTS OF POOL DECKREMOVAL.RELOCATE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINESTHROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.1234567891011NOTES:1. SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND.2.SCALE IN FEET0102012HGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439C200SITEDEMOLITIONPLAN5Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 41 of 492 64TH STREET W.MFF=871.20 M NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOETNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2R10'R10'R5'4'2444.55'4'311R3 '56KEY NOTESTRAFFIC BOLLARDS - SEE DETAIL 4/C900RETAINING WALL - SEE STRUCTURAL PLANSMODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALLCONCRETE STAIRB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SEE 1/C900INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN - SEE SHEET C2002" BITUMINOUS WEAR (MnDOT 2360, SPWEA340C)2" BITUMINOUS WEAR (MnDOT 2360, SPWEA340C)10" AGGREGATE BASE - CLASS 5 (MnDOT 3138)T.A. APPROVED SUBGRADESEE LANDSCAPE PLANS5" CONCRETEMACRO FIBER REINFORCING4" AGGREGATE BASE (MnDOT 3138)T.A. APPROVED SUBGRADESURFACING LEGEND:BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTCONCRETEWALKAGGREGATESURFACING1234NOTES:1. SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND.SCALE IN FEET0102056SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANSPOOL DECKHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439C300SITE LAYOUTAND SURFACINGPLANReceived 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 42 of 492 64TH STREET W.MFF=871.20 M >>>> CON T RO L PO IN T # 5 0 0 2N: 1 3 4 4 2 1 . 0 2 6 8 E : 5 1 2 4 2 1 . 3 0 1 9 NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2 8 6 2 . 9 CON TOUR 862.9 CONTOUROEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEETNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67>>866866865865866866865865CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYEXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATIONOF EXISTING DIP PIPE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY ENGINEEROF ANY DISCREPANCIESSTRUCTURERIM EL: 872.5IE(NE): 865.4IE(W): 866.3812 LF 8" PVC SCH 40 @ 1.00%866866E.O.SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2FEET50NOTES:1. SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND.2.SCALE IN FEET01020MFF=871.20 M OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGGGGGGGGGTNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67865.9865.9866.10868.55865.90865.90 >> >>865.90866.50866.50866.50865.50865.80865.50868.9865.60865.80865.80865.80865.61865.7578 LF 8" PVC SCH40 @ 0.26%CONSTRUCT ADS DRAIN BASIN OVER EXISTING9" DIPRIM EL: 865.60EXISTING 9" IE(SW/NE): 863.20 (FIELD VERIFY)PROPOSED 8" IE(SE): 863.30CONNECT TOPLUMBING,8" IE: 866.55,COORDINATE W/MEPHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439C400SITE GRADINGAND UTILITYPLANENLARGED PLAN1SEE 1/C400SEE SHEET C401Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 43 of 492 NOTES:1. SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND.2.SCALE IN FEET01020OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE865.90866.50866.50865.50865.50A866866865865866866865865135 LF 6" PVC SCH40 DRAINTILEEL: 863.5024" DRAIN BASINRIM EL: 865.508" IE(NW): 863.56" IE(SW): 863.578 LF 8" PVC SCH40 @ 0.26%ABMP-1PROPOSED FILTRATION BASINBOTTOM BASIN/TOP FILTRATION MEDIA: 865.00BOTTOM FILTRATION MEDIA: 863.50WATER QUALITY ELEVATION: 865.6590 LF 8" PVC SCH 40 @ 0.44%8" HEADWALL W/RIP RAPIE: 865.00SEE DETAIL X/C900866E.O.64TH STREET W.HGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439C401FILTRATIONBASIN PLANEOF ELEV: 865.90WATER QUALITY VOLUME: 865.36BOTTOM BASIN/TOP FILTRATION MEDIA: 865.003' GEOMEMBRANE1.5'6" PERFORATED DRAINTILEPVC SCH 40, IE: 863.50ENHANCED FILTRATION MEDIA, 1.5' DEPTHTOP BERM 866.00EXISTINGVEGETATEDSLOPEMATCH EXISTINGVEGETATION3:1 MAX SIDESLOPE3:1 MAX SIDESLOPEMATCHEXISTINGPAVEMENTELEVATION4'3:1 MAX SIDESLOPEEXISTINGPAVEMENTTO REMAINSECTION A-A - PROPOSED ENHANCED FILTRATION BASINBOTTOM FILTRATION MEDIA: 863.50STORMWATER MANAGEMENTSUMMARYNEW IMPERVIOUS /DISTURBEDIMPERVIOUS AREA6,026 SFWATER QUALITYVOLUME REQUIRED553 CFWATER QUALITYVOLUME PROVIDED(BETWEEN EL 865.00 -865.65839 CFEXISTINGPAVEMENT TO BEREMOVEDPLAN3" PEA GRAVELReceived 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 44 of 492 64TH STREET W.MFF=871.20 M NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOETNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2112223344KEY NOTESEXISTING TREE TYP. - PROTECT WITH FENCINGLIMITS OF SCOPEEXISTING STRUCTURE - PRESERVE & PROTECTREFER TO CIVIL DWGS. FOR SURFACING & GRADINGPLANTING LEGEND:TURF SODRAMY TURF PRODUCTS OR EQ.WOODLAND UPLAND SEED MIXPRAIRIE MOON NURSERY OR EQ.STORMWATER DETENTION BASIN SEED MIXPRAIRIE MOON NUSERY OR EQ.1SCALE IN FEET01020EX. TREE - TO BE PROTECTEDMULTI-STEM DECIDUOUS TREE3" CAL. B&B; 3 STEMRIVER BIRCHORNAMENTAL GRASS#3 CTNR.; 2' O.C.GENERAL NOTES1.UTILIZE "CALL 811" UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO ALL EXCAVATION ACTIVITY.2. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN DIGITAL DRAWING FILE FOR LAYOUT & LOCATIONVERIFICATION OF ALL SITE & LANDSCAPE FEATURES.3. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES.4. PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" (D) SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.5. PLANTING SOIL INTENDED TO BE EXISTING ONSITE TOPSOIL. STOCKPILE &PROTECT. TEST & AMEND AS REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO SPECIFICATIONS.6. PREVENT COMPACTION OF PLANTING SOILS DURING ALL PHASES OF LANDSCAPING.MITIGATE DISTURBED SITE AREA SOILS COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYTHAT WILL BE SEEDED OR PLANTED BY SCARIFYING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 24",COVERING SOIL WITH 2" OF GRADE 2 COMPOST (MNDOT 3890), AND TILLINGCOMPOST INTO SOIL PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLANTING.7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WATERING AS REQUIRED TO PROMOTE PLANT HEALTHAND ESTABLISHMENT AS REQUIRED PER WARRANTY AND SPECIFICATIONS234HGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NO DESCRIPTION DATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNO T FO RCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439L200LANDSCAPEPLANReceived 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 45 of 492 “” “” “” Received 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 46 of 492 BENCHMARKYELLOW JACKET IN EAST SIDE OF POLEELEV = 867.31BENCHMARKYELLOW JACKET IN WEST SIDE OF POLEELEV = 867.39PBPPPPM FF = 8 7 1 . 2 0 M BPPPFF=871.20OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGGGEEEEEEEEEEE> >CONTROL POINT #5000N: 134482.4971E: 512269.2844CONTROL POINT #5002N: 134421.0268E: 512421.3019CONTROL POINT #5001N: 134293.4076E: 512604.585564TH STREET W.865.20865.07864.97864.86864.80864.94864.99865.06 865.08865.05864.97864.88865.48865.63865.62865.80866.26865.67866.99866.54867.17870.9387 1 . 0 3 870.96870.19 870.83 867.18 867.33 867.31867.62867.70867.55866.70 865.76865.46865.55865.42865.45865.54865.39865 . 5 1 865 . 6 4 865 . 7 0 865 . 6 7 866.05 865.93865.78865.81 865.83 870.22865.63865.53865.36865.16865.10865.14865.19865.24865.34865.34865.42865.48865.39865.73865.66865.48865.4286 5 . 40 865.92865.52862.48 6 2 . 2 8 6 2 . 1 8 6 1 . 9 8 6 2 . 4 8 6 2 . 2 8 6 2 . 1 8 6 2 . 2 8 6 2 . 2 8 6 2 . 4 8 6 2 . 2 8 6 2 . 1 8 6 2 . 2865.0864.7864.4864.9864.9864.7864.7864.7864.6864.9864.5864.8865.2865.23869.0870 . 0874.0869.4866.3866.187 2 . 9 877.28 7 5 . 9 874.4873.8874.0873.4872.9876.0874.9873.687 0 . 0 867.0871.2868.1 87 3 . 8 869.5866.5866.6866.6866.6865.4866.2866 . 9 866.7870.0870.1870.2868.8870.2873.5871.1865.5865.9877.1875.2B-2866.6B-1867.0HAB-1871.19" D I P ST-2866.2ST-3866.6NO PARKING(TYP)RIP RAPBOULDERE M E R G E C Y S H U T O F F AT T A C H E D T O B L D G EDGE OF WATER LOCATED 2023 JUL 24ELEV. = ±862.2 FT.CONCO N S T E P S & BL O C K R E T W A L L CON STEPS, RAILING& CON RET WALLBOULDERWOOD POSTSBITUMINOUSSURFACEP O N D870863863863870870873870875875870.3 CLV T INV ELEV=863.02?862.9 CONTOUR862.9 CONTOUR12224 NICOLLET AVENUEBURNSVILLE, MN 55337(952) 890-0509H:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T1131602\CAD\C3D\131602_V_BASE_E1.dwg 8/1/2023 1:42 PM©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2023, All Rights ReservedFOR:DRAWN BY:FIELD BOOK:JOB NUMBER:TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY4300 66TH STREET W., EDINA, MN 55435PART OF:S 1/2 OF NE 1/4SEC. 30, TWP. 28, RGE. 24HENNEPIN COUNTY, MNCITY OF EDINAH:\EDINA_CI_MN\0T1131602\CAD\C3D\SDB131602-HennepinMN-F0T1.131602MEA/ERWFILE NO. 5451 DWG. NO. 3915 S30-T28-R24-13,14RRSCALE IN FEET02040LEGAL DESCRIPTIONThe surveyed area lies within:(Certificate of Title No. 269389)Land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota:The South 520.42 feet of the North 1040.85 feet of the following described property:All that part of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, Range 24, lying West of the following described line:Beginning at a point in the North line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, 329 feet West of the West line of Brookview Avenue asplatted in Peacedale Acres which point is the Southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Bourgeois Addition; thence running Southeasterly to apoint in the Westerly right of way line of Valley View Road, which point is 97.3 feet North as measured at right angles from the South lineof said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence running Southeasterly along the Westerly right of way line of Valley View Road to theSouth line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and there terminating.UTILITIESUnderground utility lines and structures are shown in an approximate way only, according to information provided by others. A request thatutilities be located for this survey was made through Gopher State One Call (Ticket No. Ticket No. 231944266 & 232012882). A request thatprivate utilities be located for this survey was made through ZoneOne Locating (Address: PO Box 361, Buffalo, MN 55313) and was completedon June 17, 2023. The underground utility lines and structures shown on this map represent the information provided to Bolton & Menk, Inc.as a result of said requests. The surveyor does not guarantee that the information provided was either complete or accurate. The surveyordoes not guarantee that there are no other underground utility lines and structures, active or abandoned, on or adjacent to the subjectproperty.SURVEYOR'S NOTES1. This survey was performed, and the survey map prepared, without benefit of either a title insurance commitment or an attorney's titleopinion. The record boundary and easement information (if any) shown hereon is based on information provided by the client. Research ofdocuments affecting title to the property surveyed or adjoining properties has been limited to a cursory review of record information and it isrecommended that all title matters affecting this property and survey be reviewed by an attorney or other title professional._____________________________________Eric R. WilfahrtLicense Number 46166SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATIONI hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyorunder the laws of the State of Minnesota. ________________Date08/01/2023Horizontal Datum: NAD 83 (1986 Adj.) Hennepin County Coordinate SystemVertical Datum: Local Edina Aquatic CenterLEGENDBENCH MARKCONTROL POINT (BOLTON & MENK, INC.)LIGHT POLESOIL BORINGTRAFFIC SIGNDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREESTORM SEWER (EXACT LOCATION UNKNOWN)INTERMEDIATE CONTOURSINDEX CONTOURS>>ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND (FIELD LOCATED)GAS UNDERGROUND (FIELD LOCATED)OVERHEAD ELECTRIC (FIELD LOCATED)EGOECLVTCULVERTCONTROL POINT (OTHERS)METERPMPOSTTRANSFORMER-ELECTRICBOLLARDB862.9 ELEVATION CONTOURReceived 2/21/25 Planning DivisionPage 47 of 492 64TH STREET W.MFF=871.20 M NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOETNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2112223344111155KEY NOTESEXISTING TREE TYP. - PRESERVE & PROTECTLIMITS OF SCOPEEXISTING STRUCTURE - PRESERVE & PROTECTREFER TO CIVIL DWGS. FOR SURFACING & GRADINGTREE PROTECTION FENCING, TYP - REFER TO DETAILS ON L120PLANTING LEGEND:1SCALE IN FEET01020EX. TREE - TO BE PROTECTEDTREE PROTECTION FENCING,REFER TO L120GENERAL NOTES1.UTILIZE "CALL 811" UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO ALL EXCAVATION ACTIVITY.2.ONLY THOSE PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY MAY REMOVE ANY TREES FROM3.PUBLIC LAND. TREES REMOVED FROM ANY PUBLIC LAND INCLUDING CITY, COUNTYOR STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE PERSON OR ENTITY WHOREMOVED IT. REPLACEMENT SHALL BE IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:3.1.REPLACEMENT OF ANY LIVE TREE WHICH IS REMOVED FROM ANY PUBLIC LANDSHALL BE REQUIRED ON A CALIPER INCH FOR CALIPER INCH BASIS. THE CITYMAY ALSO ELECT TO RECEIVE CASH IN LIEU OF TREES BASED ON FEE PERCALIPER INCH DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.3.2.REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE OF SPECIES APPROVED BY THE CITY FORESTER.2345HGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNO T FO RCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439L100TREE PROTECTIONPLANPage 48 of 492 4'-0"Tree ProtectiveBarrier: Refer toSpec. 320190Install posts at 8'o.c.SECTION VIEWKEEP OUTTREEPROTECTIONAREA8.5" x 11"sign laminatedin plasticspaced every50' along thefenceCrown Dripline or other limit of Tree Protection Area. SeeTree Preservation Plan for Fence alignment.4'-0"Maintain existing grade withthe tree protection fenceunless otherwise indicatedon the plans.Fence Posts; Refer to Spec.3201906" thick layer of wood chipmulch.Notes:1- Refer to spec. 320190 for additionaltree protection requirements.2- If there is no existing irrigation, seespecifications for watering requirements.3- No pruning shall be performed exceptby approved arborist. Refer to spec.3296434- No equipment shall operate inside theprotective fencing including during fenceinstallation and removal.5- See site preparation plan for anymodifications with the Tree Protectionarea.SECTION VIEWSECTION VIEWKEEP OUTTREEPROTECTIONAREA8.5" x 11" signlaminated in plasticspaced every 50' alongthe fence.Access road.Crown DriplineSECTION VIEWMaintain existing grade with thetree protection fence unlessotherwise indicated on theplans.8 - 12" thick layer of mulchon maintenance road; 6"thick layer inside treeprotection area.Notes:1- Refer to spec. 320190 for additional treeprotection requirements.2- If there is no existing irrigation, seespecifications for watering requirements.3- No pruning shall be performed except byapproved arborist. Refer to spec. 329643.134- No equipment shall operate inside theprotective fencing including during fenceinstallation and removal.5- See site preparation plan for anymodifications with the Tree Protectionarea.Fence Posts; Refer tospec. 320190Plastic/Snow ProtectionZone Fencing: Refer toSpec. 320190Install posts at 8' o.c.PRIMARY TILLAGE - PASS 1INCORPORATION TILLAGE - PASS 2CULTIVATE IN PLACE SOIL DEPTH4" OF GRADE 2 COMPOST AND OTHERSPECIFIED ADDITIVES THOROUGHLYMIXED WITH IN PLACE CULTIVATED SOILSDIRECTION OFSPADING MACHINEDIRECTION OFSPADING MACHINEBRANCHES PRUNED TO LIVE BUDBRANCHES PRUNED AT TRUNK(SHIGO METHOD)PRUNING SAW PROCEDURES:1.CUT PART WAY THROUGH THE BRANCH AT POINT A.2.CUT COMPLETELY THROUGH BRANCH FROM POINT B TO A.3.AT BRANCH COLLAR CUT FROM POINT C TO D.INCORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO X (TOO CLOSE) WILL RESULT INDISCONTINUOUS CALLUS FORMATION AFTER ONE SEASON OFGROWTH.CORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO D (LEAVING BRANCH COLLAR BUTNOT THE STUB FROM POINT B TO A) WILL RESULT IN CONTINUOUSDONUT SHAPED CALLUS FORMATION AFTER ONE SEASON OFGROWTH.PRUNING NOTES:1.PRUNE USING CLEAN AND SHARP SCISSOR TYPE PRUNEROR PRUNING SAW.2.THE BEST TIME TO PRUNE IS LATE DORMANT SEASON OREARLY SPRING.3.AVOID PRUNING OAKS IN APRIL , MAY, JUNE OR JULY.4.IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY OR IF WOUNDS OCCUR TO OAKTREES IN APRIL, MAY, JUNE OR JULY, IMMEDIATELY PAINTCUT SURFACE OR WOUND WITH LATEX PAINT OR SHELLAC.LIVE BRANCHBRANCH BARKRIDGEDEAD BRANCHABCDBADCXDEAD BRANCHCORRECTPRUNING CUTTOOCLOSETOOLONGTOOSLANTEDLIVE BUD, TYP.Tree Protection AreaDO NOT ENTER THE FENCED AREAWe appreciate your cooperation toprotect these trees duringconstructionTREE PROTECTION SIGNCONSTRUCTION LIMITS (LOD)DRIP LINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONEDESIRED1.FABRICATE 12" X 9" X 3/8 SIGN WITH 0.75" RADIUS CORNERS.2.SIGN SHALL BE WHITE WITH BLACK LETTERING.3.ATTACH SIGN TO POST USING 1" LENGTH WOOD SCREWS.1.FURNISH AND INSTALL PLASTIC/SNOW PROTECTION ZONE FENCING AT THE TREE'SDRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED PRIOR TO AN CONSTRUCTION.REFER TO SPEC. 320190.2.WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE.3.PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 50' INTERVALS.1.(A) IS THE DIAMETER OF TREES MEASURED 4.5 FEET ABOVE THEGROUND AND IS TERMED THE "DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT" (DBH).2.USING A TREE DIAMETER TAPE, WRAP THE TAPE AROUND THE GIRTHOF THE TREE, AT THE DBH, BEING CAREFUL NOT TO TWIST THE TAPE.MINIMUM DEPTHOF TUNNELBORE TUNNELMINIMUM DISTANCE FROMTREE TRUNKTREEMEASURE TREE DIAMETER AT4.5 FT. ABOVE GROUNDDRIP LINE CRITICALROOT ZONEDIRECTIONAL DRILLINGMACHINEAABC< 2"2'2'2-4"4'2.5'> 4-9"6'2.5'> 9-14"10'3'> 14-19"12'3.25'> 19"15'4'TEMPORARY FENCEREDUCED ROUNDINGNORMAL ROUNDINGSIGNIFICANT TREES NEAR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WILL BE IDENTIFIED ONTHE PLAN OR BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND WILL BE PRESERVED BY THECONTRACTOR1.PLACE THE TEMPORARY FENCE2.REDUCE SLOPE ROUNDING WHERE ROOT ZONES ARE DISTURBED BY NORMALSLOPE ROUNDING3.VARY BACKSLOPE STEEPNESS TO AVOID TREE LOSS OR UNNECESSARY ROOTDRIP LINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONEEXISTING GROUNDBACKFILLSANDY LOAM FILLPERFORATED PIPE1.ANY FILL REQUIRED IN THE DRIP LINES OF TREES, IS UNCOMPACTED SANDY LOAMTOPSOIL (WITH A COARSE SAND COMPONENT).2.EXCESSIVE FILL MAY REQUIRE INSTALLING PERFORATED PIPE WITH AT LEAST ONEDAYLIGHTED END OPENING AS AN AERATION SYSTEM.CLEAN ROOT CUTTINGROOT SYSTEM BRIDGEEXCAVATION AREAMAXIMUM DEPTHNECESSARY FORCONSTRUCTION1.WHEN DESIGNATED ON THE PLAN OR DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, ALL TREE ROOTS WILL BE CLEANLY CUT BY A VIBRATORYPLOW OR OTHER APPROVED ROOT CUTTER.2.THE TREE ROOTS WILL BE CUT CLEANLY TO THE MAXIMUM DEPTH NECESSARYFOR CONSTRUCTION.3.IMMEDIATELY AND CLEANLY CUT DAMAGED AND EXPOSED ROOTS.4.ROOT ENDS EXPOSED BY EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELYCOVERED WITH 6" LAYER OF ADJACENT SOIL.DRIP LINE CRITICALROOT ZONESIF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST TRAVEL OVER ROOT ZONES, THE CONTRACTOR MUST EITHER:1.CONSTRUCT ROOT SYSTEM BRIDGES WITH STEEL PLATE SUPPORTED ON WOOD TIMBERSPLACED RADIALLY TO THE TREE TRUNK.OR2.PLACE A 6" LAYER OF WOOD CHIP MULCH OVER A TYPE III GEOTEXTILE6" WOOD CHIP MULCHSTEEL PLATESTIMBERSWOOD CHIP MULCH BEDROOT SYSTEM BRIDGEHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNO T FO RCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439L120TREEPROTECTIONDETAILS4TREE PROTECTION: ACCESS ROAD1TREE PROTECTION2TREE PROTECTION: TEMPORARY FENCE AND SIGNS3TREE PROTECTION: PRUNING5SOIL COMPACTION REMEDIATION6TREE PROTECTION: UTILITY CONSTRUCTION7TREE PROTECTION: ROOT ZONES9TREE PROTECTION: SOIL FILL OVER ROOTS8TREE PROTECTION: GRADING10TREE PROTECTION: ROOT CUTTINGPage 49 of 492 420 North 5th Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.758.4000 HGA.COM s March 6, 2025 Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement Request for Variance HGA Commission Number 3857-012-07 Dear Mr. Teague, On behalf of our client, The City of Edina, we are requesting a zoning variance to Edina Code of Ordinances section 36-1268 – Setbacks from naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, for a pump room replacement at the Edina Aquatics Center located in Rosland Park. This ordinance requires a minimum 50’-0” setback from ordinary high-water elevation (OHWL). Due to the physical site limitations, as well as the location of existing aquatics facility infrastructure, the project is requesting a variance to this setback to reduce it to 38’-6” from addition footprint to OHWL. Because the Swimming Pond is not perpendicular to our building, the average setback is closer to 42’-0”, but at our pinch point we’re at 38’-6” from OHWL. See sheet A021 and it’s enlarged in the Variance request pdf (page 8 & 9). We anticipate this variance Request will be reviewed at the Planning Commission Meeting on March 26th, 2025. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Certificate of Title No. 269389) Land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: The South 520.42 feet of the North 1040.85 feet of the following described property: All that part of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, Range 24, lying West of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the North line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, 329 feet West of the West line of Brookview Avenue as platted in Peacedale Acres which point is the Southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Bourgeois Addition; thence running Southeasterly to a point in the Westerly right of way line of Valley View Road, which point is 97.3 feet North as measured at right angles from the South line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence running Southeasterly along the Westerly right of way line of Valley View Road to the South line of said South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and there terminating. Page 50 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement March 6th, 2025 Page 2 Project Description The Edina Aquatic Center opened in 1958 and celebrated its 67th year of operation in 2024. The facility consists of an admissions area, concession stand, bathhouse and four separate bodies of water, including an 8 lane 50-meter pool, a zero-depth entry pool, a plunge pool and a surf simulator. It is a regional destination with visitors from the twin cities, greater Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Currently, the facility sees approximately 85,000 visitors a year during an eleven-week season. In Summer of 2022, HGA Architects and Engineers were contracted by the City of Edina to perform an existing conditions assessment of the Aquatic Center Pump Room that serves the Edina Aquatics Center located at 4300 West 66th Street. The report that followed outlined several critical deficiencies relative to the physical structure, mechanical and electrical systems, and operational needs of the 1950’s era Pump Room, ultimately deeming it in poor physical condition and operationally outdated. The original Pump Room has undergone a handful smaller renovations and additions over the decades, but years of exposure to corrosive gases due mainly to the use of liquid muriatic acid, and a very limiting head room height in the range of about 8’-0” to 9’-6” makes the space functionally unsuitable for modern equipment. In the Fall of 2022 HGA Architects and Engineers were contracted by the City of Edina to conduct a concept design, which proposed multiple options for the replacement of the existing Pump Room facility. A direction was selected and in April of 2023 HGA and the City of Edina initiated Schematic design of the preferred direction. Design development was completed in late September 2023. Construction Documents for the project began in November 2024. The proposed Pump Room replacement facility is located to the North of the original Pump Room, situated between the original Pump Room and West 64th street. The proposed facility includes a filtration room, appropriately sized to serve the needs of the 3 bodies of water that the original filtration room currently serves. The new filtration room also provides appropriate vertical clearances for the pool filters (11’-8” clearance from floor to ceiling). In addition to the filtration room, the first floor of the facility provides a separated pool boiler room, two new chemical storage spaces, including a rated hazardous room for chlorine tablet storage, a loading dock, and storage to support the facilities operation. The pool deck level of the proposed project includes a patron pavilion dedicated to elevating the user experience as well as providing much needed off season deck storage. It will also provide additional areas of shade for patrons. The narrative that follows provides additional explanation for the variance request. Page 51 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement March 6th, 2025 Page 3 Proposed Zoning Code Variance Narrative: City of Edina Zoning Code of Ordinances section 36-1268 requires that all principal and accessory structures shall maintain a minimum setback of 50 feet from the ordinary high-water elevation of naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams. Due to the physical site limitations, as well as the location of existing aquatics facility infrastructure, the project is requesting a variance to this setback which would allow the new Pump Room to be located closer than the required 50’ setback to Swimming pool pond; specifically, with an ‘average’ of about 42’-0” setback from the OHWL, and 38’-6” at its greatest pinch point. • West 64th street runs along the shoreline of swimming pool pond, limiting the available site for the proposed replacement facility. • The physical condition of the existing Pump Room is at the end of its service life and in addition, does not meet the operational requirements of the 3 bodies of water it serves. • Due to the existing subgrade piping infrastructure of the 3 water bodies that the current Pump Room serves, the footprint of the existing outdated pump room must remain in its current location. • The seasonal nature of the facility requires a phased approach, requiring the existing Pump Room to remain operational during the construction of the replacement facility. • The first floor of the Pump Room is proposed to be located at an ‘average’ of 42’-0” setback from the swimming pool pond ordinary high-water elevation (OHWL) of 862.9; with its greatest pinch-point at 38’-6” setback from OHWL. This location provides for the minimum required usable space within the pumproom to meet the operational requirements and physical requirements of the pump room equipment, while providing the greatest possible setback from the ordinary high-water elevation, as well as from west 64th street. • The pool deck level aligns with the existing pool deck and accommodates a patron pavilion dedicated to elevating the user experience as well as providing much needed off season deck storage. The positioning of this structure is more flexible than the pump room below and has been located with an approximate average 50’-0” from the swimming pool pond ordinary high-water elevation of 862.9 to minimize the massing of the overall facility, acknowledge the required setback, and provide a more human scaled amenity to pool patrons. • The reduction of the massing by locating the pavilion as described above effectively uses the floor level of the pavilion as an extension of the pool deck terrace, keeping the north expression of the Edina aquatics center in context with the overall facility. • Because the addition is required for functionality, but our team has tried to remain sensitive to the required 50’-0” setback, especially at the pool deck level, we believe our request is still in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. West 64th street is also already within the 50’-0” setback, so we are not disturbing or developing existing green space any closer to the pond than has already been developed. Page 52 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement February 21st, 2025 Page 4 developing existing green space any closer to the pond than has already been developed. •The project is also required to meet Nine Mile Creek review & approval and will remove a small area of paved parking south of West 64th street and replace it with new green infrastructure – a new BMP Filtration Basin. Because the project is making overall stormwater improvements and adding green infrastructure, we believe this project and resulting variance request is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. •This project aims to keep the Aquatic Center functional and operating as an amenity for the community for many decades to come. The Pump Room needs to grow to accommodate modern equipment, piping, and HVAC. For this reason, we believe the variance request is ‘reasonable’ even if not maintaining the 50’-0” setback at the Pump Room level. •Existing conditions, including the existing pools, existing Pump Room, existing West 64th street, existing grading between the pools and West 64th street, existing trees within this sloped area that we are trying to limit disturbance of – all of these factors are unique to this property, and for the most part are not created by the landowner. The landowner wants to maintain and improve this community amenity. •This variance request does reduce the required setback from the OHWL, but we believe it will not negatively alter the essential character of the locality. o Our proposed project will remove the faux stone finish currently at the existing Pump Room and replace it with an attractive and durable polished burnished block, with a clear anti-graffiti coating. The existing bath house also has CMU block finish, tying the addition more closely to existing architecture on this same site. o The mass-timber structure and cedar siding finish of the cabanas above will demonstrate Edina’s interest in reducing embodied carbon in projects and promoting sustainable design. o The Pump Room is primarily visible from West 64th street, which serves as an access road between parking lots at Rosland Park and doesn’t have any direct views to neighboring R-1 / single family properties. From further away, the Pump Room is visible from Highway 62 and Valley View Road, but this average distance of being 8 feet closer to the swimming pool pond will be barely perceptible from these far-off distances. Sincerely, Nancy Blankfard, FAIA, LEED AP Vice President Principal Page 53 of 492 Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement March 6th, 2025 Page 5 Attachment(s) Refer to list of submitted documents below Variance Request Attachments The following is a list of attached documents for the variance request of the proposed Edina Aquatics Center – Pump Room Replacement. All documents provided by HGA unless noted otherwise: 1. Variance Application, provided by City of Edina 2. Application Fee, understood to be waived since City of Edina is also applicant 3. Variance Application Package 1) Existing Context Plan 2) Property Boundary 3) Existing Site Plan with proposed Pump Room replacement 4) Existing Site Images 5) Existing Conditions Images (3 pages) 6) Plan Set Materials a. Architectural Drawings i. A021 – SITE PLAN – PLANNING VARIANCE – PUMP ROOM LEVEL (scaled) ii. A021 – ENLARGED SITE PLAN – PUMP ROOM LEVEL (not to scale) iii. A022 – SITE PLAN – PLANNING VARIANCE – POOL DECK LEVEL (scaled) iv. A022 – ENLARGED SITE PLAN – POOL DECK LEVEL (not to scale) v. A012 – DESIGN VIEWS vi. Materials Palette vii. A100 – DEMOLITION PLANS viii. A200 – FLOOR PLANS ix. A400 – EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDINGS SECTIONS x. Section Comparison – Proposed vs. Existing b. Aquatics Drawings i. AQ310 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN ii. AQ311 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM PLAN iii. AQ322 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM SECTIONS iv. AQ323 – AQUATICS MECHANICAL ROOM SECTIONS c. Civil & Landscape Drawings i. C100 – EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ii. C200 – SITE DEMOLITION PLAN iii. C300 – SITE LAYOUT AND SURFACING PLAN iv. C400– SITE GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN v. C401 – FILTRATION BASIN PLAN vi. L100 – TREE PROTECTION PLAN vii. L120 – TREE PROTECTION DETAILS viii. L200 – LANDSCAPE PLAN d. Survey, provided by Loucks, and Bolton & Menk i. Topographic Survey – overall site – reference – 10/19/16 ii. Topographic Survey – Signed 08.01.2023 Page 54 of 492 64TH STREET W.MFF=871.20 M NO PARK ING (TYP ) CLVT INV E L EV = 8 6 3 . 0 2OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOETNEW PUMP ROOM ADDITIONPOOL DECK ELEV=881.67NEW PUMP ROOM ELEV=868.67SWIMMING POOL PONDOWHL = 862.9100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION = 866.2112223344111155KEY NOTESEXISTING TREE TYP. - PRESERVE & PROTECTLIMITS OF SCOPEEXISTING STRUCTURE - PRESERVE & PROTECTREFER TO CIVIL DWGS. FOR SURFACING & GRADINGTREE PROTECTION FENCING, TYP - REFER TO DETAILS ON L120PLANTING LEGEND:1SCALE IN FEET01020EX. TREE - TO BE PROTECTEDTREE PROTECTION FENCING,REFER TO L120GENERAL NOTES1.UTILIZE "CALL 811" UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO ALL EXCAVATION ACTIVITY.2.ONLY THOSE PERSONS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY MAY REMOVE ANY TREES FROM3.PUBLIC LAND. TREES REMOVED FROM ANY PUBLIC LAND INCLUDING CITY, COUNTYOR STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE PERSON OR ENTITY WHOREMOVED IT. REPLACEMENT SHALL BE IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:3.1.REPLACEMENT OF ANY LIVE TREE WHICH IS REMOVED FROM ANY PUBLIC LANDSHALL BE REQUIRED ON A CALIPER INCH FOR CALIPER INCH BASIS. THE CITYMAY ALSO ELECT TO RECEIVE CASH IN LIEU OF TREES BASED ON FEE PERCALIPER INCH DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.3.2.REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE OF SPECIES APPROVED BY THE CITY FORESTER.2345HGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNO T FO RCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439L100TREE PROTECTIONPLANPage 55 of 492 4'-0"Tree ProtectiveBarrier: Refer toSpec. 320190Install posts at 8'o.c.SECTION VIEWKEEP OUTTREEPROTECTIONAREA8.5" x 11"sign laminatedin plasticspaced every50' along thefenceCrown Dripline or other limit of Tree Protection Area. SeeTree Preservation Plan for Fence alignment.4'-0"Maintain existing grade withthe tree protection fenceunless otherwise indicatedon the plans.Fence Posts; Refer to Spec.3201906" thick layer of wood chipmulch.Notes:1- Refer to spec. 320190 for additionaltree protection requirements.2- If there is no existing irrigation, seespecifications for watering requirements.3- No pruning shall be performed exceptby approved arborist. Refer to spec.3296434- No equipment shall operate inside theprotective fencing including during fenceinstallation and removal.5- See site preparation plan for anymodifications with the Tree Protectionarea.SECTION VIEWSECTION VIEWKEEP OUTTREEPROTECTIONAREA8.5" x 11" signlaminated in plasticspaced every 50' alongthe fence.Access road.Crown DriplineSECTION VIEWMaintain existing grade with thetree protection fence unlessotherwise indicated on theplans.8 - 12" thick layer of mulchon maintenance road; 6"thick layer inside treeprotection area.Notes:1- Refer to spec. 320190 for additional treeprotection requirements.2- If there is no existing irrigation, seespecifications for watering requirements.3- No pruning shall be performed except byapproved arborist. Refer to spec. 329643.134- No equipment shall operate inside theprotective fencing including during fenceinstallation and removal.5- See site preparation plan for anymodifications with the Tree Protectionarea.Fence Posts; Refer tospec. 320190Plastic/Snow ProtectionZone Fencing: Refer toSpec. 320190Install posts at 8' o.c.PRIMARY TILLAGE - PASS 1INCORPORATION TILLAGE - PASS 2CULTIVATE IN PLACE SOIL DEPTH4" OF GRADE 2 COMPOST AND OTHERSPECIFIED ADDITIVES THOROUGHLYMIXED WITH IN PLACE CULTIVATED SOILSDIRECTION OFSPADING MACHINEDIRECTION OFSPADING MACHINEBRANCHES PRUNED TO LIVE BUDBRANCHES PRUNED AT TRUNK(SHIGO METHOD)PRUNING SAW PROCEDURES:1.CUT PART WAY THROUGH THE BRANCH AT POINT A.2.CUT COMPLETELY THROUGH BRANCH FROM POINT B TO A.3.AT BRANCH COLLAR CUT FROM POINT C TO D.INCORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO X (TOO CLOSE) WILL RESULT INDISCONTINUOUS CALLUS FORMATION AFTER ONE SEASON OFGROWTH.CORRECT CUT FROM POINT C TO D (LEAVING BRANCH COLLAR BUTNOT THE STUB FROM POINT B TO A) WILL RESULT IN CONTINUOUSDONUT SHAPED CALLUS FORMATION AFTER ONE SEASON OFGROWTH.PRUNING NOTES:1.PRUNE USING CLEAN AND SHARP SCISSOR TYPE PRUNEROR PRUNING SAW.2.THE BEST TIME TO PRUNE IS LATE DORMANT SEASON OREARLY SPRING.3.AVOID PRUNING OAKS IN APRIL , MAY, JUNE OR JULY.4.IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY OR IF WOUNDS OCCUR TO OAKTREES IN APRIL, MAY, JUNE OR JULY, IMMEDIATELY PAINTCUT SURFACE OR WOUND WITH LATEX PAINT OR SHELLAC.LIVE BRANCHBRANCH BARKRIDGEDEAD BRANCHABCDBADCXDEAD BRANCHCORRECTPRUNING CUTTOOCLOSETOOLONGTOOSLANTEDLIVE BUD, TYP.Tree Protection AreaDO NOT ENTER THE FENCED AREAWe appreciate your cooperation toprotect these trees duringconstructionTREE PROTECTION SIGNCONSTRUCTION LIMITS (LOD)DRIP LINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONEDESIRED1.FABRICATE 12" X 9" X 3/8 SIGN WITH 0.75" RADIUS CORNERS.2.SIGN SHALL BE WHITE WITH BLACK LETTERING.3.ATTACH SIGN TO POST USING 1" LENGTH WOOD SCREWS.1.FURNISH AND INSTALL PLASTIC/SNOW PROTECTION ZONE FENCING AT THE TREE'SDRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED PRIOR TO AN CONSTRUCTION.REFER TO SPEC. 320190.2.WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE.3.PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 50' INTERVALS.1.(A) IS THE DIAMETER OF TREES MEASURED 4.5 FEET ABOVE THEGROUND AND IS TERMED THE "DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT" (DBH).2.USING A TREE DIAMETER TAPE, WRAP THE TAPE AROUND THE GIRTHOF THE TREE, AT THE DBH, BEING CAREFUL NOT TO TWIST THE TAPE.MINIMUM DEPTHOF TUNNELBORE TUNNELMINIMUM DISTANCE FROMTREE TRUNKTREEMEASURE TREE DIAMETER AT4.5 FT. ABOVE GROUNDDRIP LINE CRITICALROOT ZONEDIRECTIONAL DRILLINGMACHINEAABC< 2"2'2'2-4"4'2.5'> 4-9"6'2.5'> 9-14"10'3'> 14-19"12'3.25'> 19"15'4'TEMPORARY FENCEREDUCED ROUNDINGNORMAL ROUNDINGSIGNIFICANT TREES NEAR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WILL BE IDENTIFIED ONTHE PLAN OR BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND WILL BE PRESERVED BY THECONTRACTOR1.PLACE THE TEMPORARY FENCE2.REDUCE SLOPE ROUNDING WHERE ROOT ZONES ARE DISTURBED BY NORMALSLOPE ROUNDING3.VARY BACKSLOPE STEEPNESS TO AVOID TREE LOSS OR UNNECESSARY ROOTDRIP LINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONEEXISTING GROUNDBACKFILLSANDY LOAM FILLPERFORATED PIPE1.ANY FILL REQUIRED IN THE DRIP LINES OF TREES, IS UNCOMPACTED SANDY LOAMTOPSOIL (WITH A COARSE SAND COMPONENT).2.EXCESSIVE FILL MAY REQUIRE INSTALLING PERFORATED PIPE WITH AT LEAST ONEDAYLIGHTED END OPENING AS AN AERATION SYSTEM.CLEAN ROOT CUTTINGROOT SYSTEM BRIDGEEXCAVATION AREAMAXIMUM DEPTHNECESSARY FORCONSTRUCTION1.WHEN DESIGNATED ON THE PLAN OR DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, ALL TREE ROOTS WILL BE CLEANLY CUT BY A VIBRATORYPLOW OR OTHER APPROVED ROOT CUTTER.2.THE TREE ROOTS WILL BE CUT CLEANLY TO THE MAXIMUM DEPTH NECESSARYFOR CONSTRUCTION.3.IMMEDIATELY AND CLEANLY CUT DAMAGED AND EXPOSED ROOTS.4.ROOT ENDS EXPOSED BY EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELYCOVERED WITH 6" LAYER OF ADJACENT SOIL.DRIP LINE CRITICALROOT ZONESIF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST TRAVEL OVER ROOT ZONES, THE CONTRACTOR MUST EITHER:1.CONSTRUCT ROOT SYSTEM BRIDGES WITH STEEL PLATE SUPPORTED ON WOOD TIMBERSPLACED RADIALLY TO THE TREE TRUNK.OR2.PLACE A 6" LAYER OF WOOD CHIP MULCH OVER A TYPE III GEOTEXTILE6" WOOD CHIP MULCHSTEEL PLATESTIMBERSWOOD CHIP MULCH BEDROOT SYSTEM BRIDGEHGA NO:DATE:AQUATICS CONSULTANTUSAQUATICS5603 US-12 #2DELANO, MN 55328(763)972-5897NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY OF EDINAPUMP ROOMADDITIONNO T FO RCONSTRUCTIONCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSAPRIL 18, 20253857-012-007450 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN 55439L120TREEPROTECTIONDETAILS4TREE PROTECTION: ACCESS ROAD1TREE PROTECTION2TREE PROTECTION: TEMPORARY FENCE AND SIGNS3TREE PROTECTION: PRUNING5SOIL COMPACTION REMEDIATION6TREE PROTECTION: UTILITY CONSTRUCTION7TREE PROTECTION: ROOT ZONES9TREE PROTECTION: SOIL FILL OVER ROOTS8TREE PROTECTION: GRADING10TREE PROTECTION: ROOT CUTTINGPage 56 of 492 EdinaMN.gov An 11.5 ft LAKE SETBACK VARIANCE 4300 West 66th Street/Edina Aquatic Water Treatment Building Page 57 of 492 Site Location Page 58 of 492 Site Plan Page 59 of 492 Existing Conditions Page 60 of 492 Existing East Elevation Page 61 of 492 Page 62 of 492 Conditions Page 63 of 492 Page 64 of 492 Page 65 of 492 Page 66 of 492 Building Floor Plan Page 67 of 492 Page 68 of 492 Page 69 of 492 Page 70 of 492 Comparison Page 71 of 492 Finishes Page 72 of 492 Recommendation for Approval Staff recommends approval of a variance from Edina City Code Section 36-1268 to allow for an 11.5 ft variance from Section 36-1268, requiring a 50 ft setback from the ordinary high-water elevation, (OHWL), of a naturally occurring lake, pond or stream to allow a setback of 38.5 ft for a proposed pump room facility replacement. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1.The proposal for the pump room expansion is reasonable. The use is part of a permitted use in the Single dwelling Unit District. The Aquatic Center, and all its necessary parts are compatible with uses in the Single Dwelling Unit District. 2.The use is consistent with the Future Land Use designation for Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. 3.The variance is needed due to the functionally obsolete size of the existing building built in 1958, constructed under different setback requirements, which are current hold-over conditions that were not created by the applicant or the Aquatic Center. Prior to 1990, the setback required from the OHWE of the pond for the pump room was 25 ft and conformed at the time. 4.The variance to allow the expansion of the proposed pump house space will not alter the essential character of the locality. The new pump house with the upper pavilion will enhance the user experience of the center and address current operational deficiencies, with minimal intrusion into setback. Subject to: 1.The survey, plans and engineering submissions attached to the staff report dated February 21, 2025. 2.Watershed District approval. 3.Conformance with the City Engineer’s building permit review. 4.Conformance with tree plan as part of building permit. • Page 73 of 492 Tree Protection Page 74 of 492 Page 75 of 492 Building Sections Page 76 of 492 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: March 26, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Planning Commission Agenda Number: 7.2 Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Item Title: Sign Variances for Meeting House Church, 6200 Colonial Way Action Requested:Approve the requested variances to allow the setback from the ordinary high- water elevation of sign 1 to be at least 20 feet and to allow sign 3 to be 14 feet in height based on the following findings: 1. The criteria for the proposed sign variance are met. The request is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed monument sign 3 would sit 8 feet taller than the centerline elevation of HWY 62 to allow for visibility. 3. There are circumstances that are unique to the property and are not common in similarly zoned properties. The body of water is located entirely on the subject property and the water elevation sits lower than the proposed sign location and won’t negatively impact the body of water. 4. The proposed signage is reasonable and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Sign plans and submittal date stamped February 18, 2025. 2. Separate sign permits are required for each proposed sign. 3. The sign must comply with Sec. 36-1655, Illuminated Signs. Information/Background: The first variance request is a setback variance to the ordinary high-water elevation for the sign at the corner of Olinger Boulevard and Colonial Way (Sign 1). The request is a 30-foot variance to the 50- foot setback requirement from the ordinary high-water elevation of the naturally occurring waterbody. The proposed sign would be a minimum of 20 feet from the OHWE. Engineering staff does not have concerns with the location of the sign in proximity to the body of water. The second variance requested is a sign height variance for the proposed sign adjacent to HWY 62 (Sign 3). The request is a 6-foot height variance to allow for a 14-foot-tall monument sign. Page 77 of 492 With the exception of the setback from the OHWE for Sign 1 and the height of Sign 3 the proposed signage meets all the requirements of the city’s sign code. Supporting Documentation: 1. Staff Report 2. Applicant Submittal 3. Photos of Existing Signage 4. Site Location Map 5. Staff Presentation Page 78 of 492 The applicant, Mike Kasbohm with Think Digital Signs, on behalf of Meeting House Church, property owner, is requesting two sign variances for two of the three monument signs proposed at 6200 Colonial Way. The subject property, 6200 Colonial Way, is 13.56-acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Olinger Boulevard and Colonial Way, north of HWY 62. The first variance request is a setback variance to the ordinary high-water elevation for the sign at the corner of Olinger Boulevard and Colonial Way (Sign 1). The request is a 30-foot variance to the 50-foot setback requirement from the ordinary high-water elevation of the naturally occurring waterbody. The proposed sign would be a minimum of 20 feet from the OHWE. Engineering staff does not have concerns with the location of the sign in proximity to the body of water. The second variance requested is a sign height variance for the proposed sign adjacent to HWY 62 (Sign 3). The request is a 6-foot height variance to allow for a 14-foot-tall monument sign. With the exception of the setback from the OHWE for Sign 1 and the height of Sign 3 the proposed signage meets all the requirements of the city’s sign code. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Residential Neighborhood, zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential Easterly: Countryside Park; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Open Space and Parks Southerly: HWY 62 Westerly: Townhome development; zoned PRD-1, Planned Residence District and guided Medium Density Residential March 26, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner B-25-03, Sign height variance and sign setback variance for monument signs at 6200 Colonial Way Information / Background: Page 79 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The site is a 13.56-acre site and is the site of Meeting House Church (formerly Colonial Church). The existing church on site was built in 1978. There are currently two existing signs on the site. The signs are in the same/similar locations to signs 1 & 2 on the applicant submittal. There was an existing third sign located adjacent to HWY 62 that is no longer standing. All existing signage was permitted in the 80’s. Planning Guide Plan designation: Public/Semi Public Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District *Requires a variance The proposed electronic signage will need to meet the illuminated sign requirements of the city code. The sign will not be allowed to change in color or intensity of light more than once per hour, unless it’s giving the time, date, temperature, or weather information. PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed variance justified? Yes, staff believes the requested variances are justified. Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: Compliance Table Freestanding Signs located in the R-1 District Sign Standards Size Height Setback Sign Code:1 freestanding sign per frontage 36 square feet 8 feet 20 feet to the curb 50 feet from ordinary high water elevation (OHWE) Sign 1:36 square feet 8 feet 20 feet to curb 20 feet to OHWE* Sign 2:36 square feet 8 feet 20 feet to curb N/A to OHWE Sign 3:36 square feet 14 feet*20 feet to curb >50’ to OHWE Page 80 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 3 1.The variances would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Staff believes that the purpose and intent of the code is to allow monument signage for visibility without causing impacts on safety or sightlines. The additional height of sign 3 is requested so that the proposed signage would be 8 feet higher than the centerline elevation of HWY 62. Sign height is measured from average existing grade, and the subject property sits 6 feet lower than the centerline of HWY 62. The proposed height of sign 3 adjacent to HWY 62 is 14 feet. Sign 1 is replacing an existing sign at the corner of Olinger Boulevard and Colonial Way. The existing sign is in a similar location to where the applicants are proposing Sign 1. The proposed location is located higher in elevation than the ordinary high-water elevation and would not impact the naturally occurring body of water. The water resources manager does not have concerns with the location of the proposed sign. 2.The variances would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The use of the property would remain consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner is requesting variances to build monument signs that fit and are visible on the subject property. The location of Sign 1 is in a similar location of the existing sign at Olinger Boulevard and Colonial Way and is located outside a drainage and utility easement. The proposed location of the sign sits much higher than the naturally occurring body of water and won’t have negative impacts. The additional height requested for sign 3 is reasonable due to the difference in elevation of the subject property and centerline of HWY 62. The proposed sign would sit 8 feet taller than the centerline of HWY 62. ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. There are circumstances that are unique to the property and are not common to similarly zoned properties. The naturally occurring body of water is located entirely on the subject property. The water elevation sits lower than the proposed sign location and the sign won’t negatively impact the body of water. The centerline elevation of HWY 62 sits 6 feet higher than the elevation where the proposed sign 3 is located. The additional height is needed for visibility. These circumstances were not created by the applicant. Page 81 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 4 iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The location of the proposed signage is similar to the existing signage on the site. Sign 1 and Sign 3 meet the city’s sign ordinance with the exception of the setback to the OHWE (sign 1) and the sign height (sign 3). The signs would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Approve the requested variances to allow the setback from the ordinary high-water elevation of sign 1 to be at least 20 feet and to allow sign 3 to be 14 feet in height based on the following findings: 1. The criteria for the proposed sign variance are met. The request is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed monument sign 3 would sit 8 feet taller than the centerline elevation of HWY 62 to allow for visibility. 3. There are circumstances that are unique to the property and are not common in similarly zoned properties. The body of water is located entirely on the subject property and the water elevation sits lower than the proposed sign location and won’t negatively impact the body of water. 4. The proposed signage is reasonable and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: •Sign plans and submittal date stamped February 18, 2025. 2. Separate sign permits are required for each proposed sign. 3. The sign must comply with Sec. 36-1655, Illuminated Signs. Page 82 of 492 Project Repor t 30 January 2019 - 10 April 2025 Bet ter Together Edina 6200 Colonial Way, Meeting House Church Sign Variances Highlights TOTAL VISITS 48 MAX VISITORS PER DAY 6 NEW REGISTRATI ONS 0 ENGAGED VISITORS 1 INFORMED VISITORS 14 AWARE VISITORS 44 Aware Participants 44 Aware Actions Performed Participants Visited a Project or Tool Page 44 Informed Participants 14 Informed Actions Performed Participants Viewed a video 0 Viewed a photo 0 Downloaded a document 4 Visited the Key Dates page 8 Visited an FAQ list Page 0 Visited Instagram Page 0 Visited Multiple Project Pages 13 Contributed to a tool (engaged)1 Engaged Participants 1 Engaged Actions Performed Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributed on Forums 0 0 0 Participated in Surveys 0 0 0 Contributed to Newsfeeds 0 0 0 Participated in Quick Polls 0 0 0 Posted on Guestbooks 1 0 0 Contributed to Stories 0 0 0 Asked Questions 0 0 0 Placed Pins on Places 0 0 0 Contributed to Ideas 0 0 0 Visitors Summar y Pageviews Visitors 24 Mar '25 7 Apr '25 5 10 15 Tool Type Engagement Tool Name Tool Status Visitors Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributors Qanda Questions?Published 1 0 0 0 Guest Book Public Input- 6200 Colonial Way- Meeting House Church Sig... Archived 3 1 0 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 April 2025 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 0 FORUM TOPICS 0 SURVEYS 0 NEWS FEEDS 0 QUICK POLLS 1 GUEST BOOKS 0 STORIES 1 Q&A S 0 PLACES Page 2 of 4 Widget Type Engagement Tool Name Visitors Views/Downloads Key Dates Key Date 8 8 Document Applicant Submittal 4 4 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 April 2025 INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY 1 DOCUMENTS 0 PHOTOS 0 VIDEOS 0 FAQS 0 KEY DATES Page 3 of 4 Visitors 3 Contributors 1 CONTRIBUTIONS 1 18 March 25 haskve AGREES 0 DISAGREES 0 REPLIES 0 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 30 January 2019 to 10 April 2025 GUEST BOOK Public Input- 6200 Colonial Way- Meeting House Church Sign Variances I have no problem with the setback variance for sign 1 as long as the entirety of the sig n is within the boundaries of the church's property and will not infringe with the sidewal k traffic. There needs to be ample distance between the sign and the heavily used side walk. Page 4 of 4 t/ MEETINGHOUSE Sign Plan, Sign Permits and Variance Request Application: Supporting Documents • 3 Sign Permit Applications: Sign Locations #1, #2 and #3 • 2 Variance Requests: Sign Location #1. & #3 • Exhibit A - Survey showing each sign location (separate document) Meeting House Church 6200 Colonial Way Edina, MN 55436 February, 2025 CITY OF EDINA FEB 1 8 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT rthinkl 1 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com L DIGITAL SIGNS J Page 83 of 492 Sign Location #1 Hardship and Variance Request for Setback from NWL (Narrative) Meeting House Church is seeking a variance for the setback of a replacement sign to the existing sign located at the corner of Olinger and Colonial Way. Current Edina Sign Code stipulates that new signs are to be setback 50' from NWL (Normal Water Level) of bodies of water nearby. The existing sign does not meet that setback, nor would the proposed. We are requesting a variance for that setback so that the sign would be 20' or more from NWL. Unique Hardship (Practical Difficulties): Meeting House Church have been active stewards in protecting and beautifying their grounds and the bodies of water that make their property unique and with varying elevations and bodies of water. A new sign at the noted location is an important part of their plans moving forward and the main/most heavily used entrance to their property. The combination of above attributes limits, along with an easement along the Olinger frontage where a replacement sign can be installed. For our sign to be safe and impactful viewed by passing traffic it would need to be located in close proximity to where the existing sign location is. The old sign would be removed. We are requesting a setback from NWL of 20' or more. This is a hardship that is applicable to our property and generally not to other properties in our zoning district. The sign's setback will not adversely affect the surrounding properties, and because it would be replacing the existing sign it will not look out of place. The sign will not alter the essential character of the area and will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. Meeting House Church in conjunction with Sign Consultants have also met with the NMCWD (Nine Mile Creek Watershed District) who determined that this Sign Location would not require any permitting from them. We are only asking for a setback variance from NWL. We will comply with all other aspects of the zoning ordinance including sign size and height. Variance Request: 20' or more setback from NWL Ordinance for New Signs: 50' from NWL CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT r think 20 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Thin kDigitalSigns.com L DIGITAL SIGNS J Page 84 of 492 Sign Location #3 Hardship and Variance Request for Height (Narrative) Meeting House Church is seeking a variance for the overall height of a new sign. Edina sign code allows a height of 8'. We are requesting an overall height of 14' (a variance of 6' of additional height). Unique Hardship (Practical Difficulties): The grade where sign #1. of our proposed plan is located on the frontage facing Hwy 62 and is 6' below that road grade level. For our sign to be easily and safely viewed by passing traffic it needs to be higher than the standard 8' allowance. We are requesting a 6' height increase (8' above the grade of Hwy 62). This is a hardship that is applicable to our property and generally not to other properties in our zoning district. There is a substantial buffer of trees between our property and those east and west of ours. We will not impact any residential properties. The sign's height will not adversely affect the surrounding properties. Because of the grade difference the sign will not look out of place as compared to the roadway. The sign will not alter the essential character of the area and will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. We are only asking for a height variance. We will comply with all other aspects of the zoning ordinance including sign size and setbacks. Variance Request: 6' Overall Additional Height Allowance. Edina Zoning Code Height Allowance: 8 Feet. Requested Sign Height: 14 Feet. CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 think' 21 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Thin kDigitalSigns.com L DIGITAL SIGNS J Page 85 of 492 4 PID 0511621'L I Ln..11.10 6200 Colonial Way, Edina, MN 55436 Address Meetinghouse Church Owner A MEETINGHOUSE CHURCH 6200 COLONIAL WAY EDINA MN 55436 Taxpayer Parcel Area 13.56 acres 590,823 sq ft 001 001 Lot Block Metes & Bounds A 2 L DIGITAL SIGNS J think 952-456-2575 ThinkDigitalSigns.com Property Map 1. Double-Sided .36sf Copy Area 2. Single-Sided 5.36sf Copy Area 3. Hwy 62 Sign 5-36sf Copy Area • 3x12 Single Face • LED Internally Lit Cabinet • Two (2) Versetta Columns Results Property Links Owner/Taxpayer Tax Parcel Torrens/Abstract Abstract Addition Colonial Church Of Edina Second Addn ringer Search by Address or PID 6200 Colonial Way, Edina 0,1,1. r AIL a it • • - - • °Or I •s ‘15 asr.; ant ' CITY OF EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Property & Proposed Sign Locations: 6200 Colonial Way, Edina, MN 55436 Page 86 of 492 Legend RIAD Regional Medical Dist. Pm Manned Industnall Dist PUD Planned Unit Dist. APO Automobile Parking Desi. EHLD Edina Hen !age Landmark Dist PSR A PLInned Senior Citizen (list. ME1O-4 Mixed Deyelopmen1 Dist. MD041 trIf.10-8 w S Pk3ninIntg Dept April 2015 PRO I Planned Residence Dist. PR D-2 PRD.3 oil ?7•.: PRD.4 PR D. PCO I Manned Commercial Dist. PCD•Z PC,O3 PCD-4 POD-1 Planned Office Dist. POD-2 Church Oity Buildings Ptrivate Schr.ral Public Schracil RA &Tighe Dwelling Und DEL Mud Lake Ill 1 1 I i I Zoning District: R1 FREE STANDING SIGNS • Maximum Size (Copy Area): 36sf, One per Frontage • 8' Hight Max, There is precedence for Height Variances. The difference in elevation of sign location to 62 would be a reasonable ask. Notes: In speaking with city planner, any portions of the sign that are lit must have a way to be dimmed or turned off if complaints from residences near by. 1 4, ; ...1 \-; ›, .... 1 1 ' 16'. , ..4 16... 1.... ,.f ....eAt • I. 'It NC. ‘11'Ito....'e 1 • k IP :be, i f. . i iir ili .," . c.,. . : 3 .‘s k_,...< ........7:1 .... ,. Is. ..1.--.......\ 1...ri., ,,, t i , • . si, 1. t `ii . • -i..... ,,,....L.......1 0 s._ .. Electronic Changeable Copy Signs • No restrictions on % of sign that can be digital • Hold time: 60 Minutes • Maximum Brightness: Not Specified (see note above) N CITY OF EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT think, 3 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Thin kDigitalSigns.com DIGITAL SIGNS Page 87 of 492 Drawing 77t/e.• BOUNDARY' LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC and UTILITY SURVEY FOR: Meeting House Church of 6200 Colonial Way LAND SURVEYING "m i4r4-.7n,ctr..7547;or5.- 90 5 25 -4:26 8 -W0 1 .9 SS': 1: ; " 8 vAvve_ounde.com I5 Main om= SUNDE Project:2011-198-D Bk/Pge.500/58 REF: 7.29135 o shex1/6 Rance:21 Section:5 F7e20/11980001-BAIDY.d ZI7 iI/2025 Shoe: 1 of 2 ] Bearings and/or dimensions listed within brackets are per plot or record documents. BENCH MARKS (BM) I.) City BM #448. Top of top nut of first fire hydrant west of Colonial Way on the north side of Olinger Boulevard. Elevation = 863.13 feet 2.) City BM #447. Top of top nut of first fire hydrant east of Colonial Woy on the south side of Olinger Boulevard. Elevation 861.63 feet 3.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant on the west side of Colonial Way on the east side of the Church. Elevation 858.43 feet 4.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant on the north side of the building located on the south side of the north parking lot. Elevation = 859.69 feet Elevations shown ore based on the City of Edina benchmarks. NGVD29 datum. AREAS Gross = 590,829 square feet or 13.564 acres S89 °48'07"E 636.84 OLINGER BLVD SEE EXHIBIT I / DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADM SEES EXHIBIT 2 r - n / A / A L_ L/ I I V/-1 S I f11- L. V / / V / 5 V 9'As \E) DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDN DOC. NO. 3263252 5 //. 6,;(5.4.„, A /n A 1-1 ITh 17-1 /Th A L_ 1 /4./ / V L/ /-1L/L// / / L,/ / V SEE EXHIBIT 3 5.7.9.3.9 '59,5 206 33 S8458 '/3 / N 9.89 4=0 "44 '/4 " R=-74.3.5 1 =957 „„ „-- STATE HWY NO 62 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 24th day of January, 2025 SUNDE RVEYIN LLC. By. Arl a J. Carlson, Minn. Lic. No. 44900 CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 50 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET (Revision IR, I Dote k'SONI DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot I, Block I, COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PLAT RECORDING INFORMATION The plot of COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA SECOND ADDITION was tiled of record on August 10th, 2012, as File No. 21511. Page 88 of 492 A7.7 me At k BITUMINOUS OLINGER BLVD CLEAR VIEW ZONE —856— — — DRAINAGE AND HPII,IPI-EASEME T PER COLONIAL.QHO_C_H OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION \ \ \ maa \ EDGE OF ICE IE \ 1-22-25 \ emo. 043 NWL 848.5 PER CITY OF EDINA //4 1 / r //1 4 / / 7 \ •134.0 ----.. --....., ,.... S'3 „,- , Sv\ ------ -, --,, mce..or \-, , 4_ CATTAILS, s\__,_. c.',. \ /J'Iv rts. • 848.5 Elevation is under ice, it appears 50 foot setback may not be obtainable 0 A 10 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET T 2 EXHI3 0 0 Po EDGE OF ICE 1-13-25 B 855.5 s5a' 8-10.5 Note: 1 /I T 4 /n/ L. L./ / / Z., L V v I \ / NWL 845.2 PER -„, CITY OF EDINA ---8B,— CRAB Denotes Crabapple tree LOC Denotes Locust tree SPR Denotes Spruce tree CN N N N N N " WPM 438 PROPOSED EXHIBIT I 10 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET 4559 etnf EXHIBIT 3 .v.. LEGEND AIS Denotes information sign BTL Denotes beavertail curb CB Denotes catch basin CMP Denotes corrugated metal pipe GRDL Denotes ground light HCR Denotes disabled ramp HI-IC Denotes communication handhole HI-IF Denotes fiber optic handhole HYD Denotes fire hydrant IE Denotes ice elevation INV Denotes structure invert LP Denotes light pole MC Denotes metal cover PKS Denotes parking sign RCP Denotes reinforced concrete pipe ST S Denotes storm sewer TAD Denotes truncated domes plate TC Denotes top of concrete curb UGE Denotes underground electric line MB 111.111111 '`, 854- • Normal water level location of 845.2 can't be obtained due to ice. We had crews look for problem. It oppears sand bags were set that are holding back water. Culvert insert measured 845.3. (See photos) -"\ 579 '39'591" 20633 a5z7 8 PROPERTY LINE 5 FT CHAINLINK S84 582/3"E /59.89 .853.3 --- CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Dated this 24 d of January, 2025 Certified by Arl e J. Carlson, .L.Z2Minn. Lic. No. 44900 BITU MINO US STATE' HWY NO. 62 JJ SUNDE x1ain nr °:3eca:tlnFzawv54):: HS sui NG i(,;i:t mnvw.suncle.com File:20111980001.0WG IShaeL. 2 of 2 10 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET Page 89 of 492 3' x 7' EMC Digital Display Area Cabinets = 3'5" x 7'3" x 5" minum Cap 4"x8'x2'2"AIi Versetta St 2'8" x 7' A 7ft. 9in. 1 r 8ft. Oin. think' ThinkDigitalSigns.com Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 4 2ft. Oin. Oft. 4.5in. 4" Sch 40 Pipe Proposed Sign: Locations #1 & #2 --1.1 2ft. Oin. -.4-- _101 1ft. Bin. ho_ __•,11ft. 6in. 4 x 7 9 ' x 2 Aluminum Cap ane Base 9" x2' Internally Illuminated ID Sign Routed Aluminum / Acrylic Backed 115" x71 3" x 1'8" 2uxixr6 Aluminum Reveal 3" Angle Iron Welded to Pole CITY OF EDINA FEB 1 8 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT .1 8ft. Oin. r 1 2ft. Oin. 5" Concrete Concrete Pad Oft. 4in. ------ lft.t 5in. Oft. 2in. --*--- 3 ft. 5in. 2ft. 8in. 'F 6ft. Oin. Oft. 6in. A 3" Foamular NGX Foam Board Insulation L DIGITAL SIGNS J #4 Rebar Cage Crushed Block Page 90 of 492 14' x1'6" x 1'6" Versetta Stone Column Treated Plywood Framing 4" x 1'8" x 1'8" Aluminum Cap Oft. 4in. Oft. 4.5in. 4" Sch 40 Proposed Sign: Location #3 1ft. 8in. 1ft. 8in. 1ft. 6in. -41 PP Cabinet: 3'5" x 12'3" x 8" Routed Aluminum / Acrylic Backed 13ft. 9.5in. 10 t. Oin. 3ft. 5in. 14ft Oin. 1ft. 6in. 6ft. Oin. 6ft. 6in. CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 -11m- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2ft. Oin • r- think 5 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com L DIGITAL SIGNS Page 91 of 492 Proposed Sign Area Sign Locations #1 and #2 Sign Location #3 3x12 = 36 sf 5' x 7'3" = 36 sf Sft. CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT think 6 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Thin kDigitalSigns.com DIGITAL SIGNS Page 92 of 492 E O CSO co 4—) C • 12-719-19° ►i - Ka s • o L+I FEB 1 8 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT co rp 0 0 U 0.?3 co C) C bO 4—) CD C CD C E -o -o a) v) 0 C 4—) U ct5 0 C CSO V) -o a) O (/) 0 O a. Page 93 of 492 ThinkDigitalSigns.com think Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 8 WORSHIP WITH US - 4i4 SUNDAYS 9:30 AM a. •- DIGITAL SIGNS IN3WILIVd30 SNINNVid -n m OD ao IV O IV CJ1 VNICE dO A.110 Proposed Sign: Location #2 (Single-Sided Monument Sign on Colonial Way) Page 94 of 492 to ThinkDigitalSigns.com Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Proposed Sign: Location #3 (Single-Sided/2 Column by Hwy. 62) VNICIE AO ALIO IN311111EIVA30 ONiNNtrici DIGITAL SIGNS Page 95 of 492 1N131A118Vd30 ONINNVld -n m CO 1-4 00 N.) O NJ CJ1 VN103 AO A110 >20' from pond when at NWL (Normal Water Level) 10 r- -I think L DIGITAL SIGNS J 952-456-2575 ThinkDigitalSigns.com Sign Setbacks: Location #1 Requesting Variance for Setback from NWL > 20' Setback from Road & Easement Page 96 of 492 It19.1 140,2 • 949,0 _ I _ Note: L DIGITAL SIGNS J think 952-456-2575 ThinkDigitalSigns.com Sign Setbacks: Location #1 Variance for Setback from NWL From Survey (Exhibit A,1) BITUMINOUS H657.3 857,2 911 957.2 9 IL7 99.3 rj k 20 IC) FEET IN Or RCP ST S 461*----_, B57.1 Liv 17 10, SCALE CITY OF EDINA FEB 1 8 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMENT OLINGER BLVD CLEAR VIEW ZONE 1111 • • • 967.9 • CONCRETE 91-51.9 . arit, m-470.2 -8561- „ Lint.411_ 95,5,9 DRArNAGE AND UM:TY -GASE-MENJ PER COLONIALg111221 OF EDNA----- FIRST ADDITION -„ to ',-..,„,, , - ---....., ---,,,, „ d. .k ."---.., ----, -,„. ,.------, L",,OF 84 '-..., ( ...4.6 0 c __ EDC ____ 0,r, CATTAI MR 0 LS.N. \-'-' \t0 949.0 1.94-9.9 84-11.0 EDGE OF ICE — 122-25 NWL 848.5 PER CITY OF EDINA FE BS B I I TO • BY! 5 * 848.5 Elevation is under ice, it appears 50 foot setback may not be obtainable Page 97 of 492 CITY OF EDINA 'G DEPARTMENT 12 I- -I think ThinkDigitalSigns.com Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Sign Setbacks: Location #2 Would Meet Code Requirements > 20' Setback from Road 7'9" Width of Monument DIGITAL SIGNS Page 98 of 492 H X [ fi I0 10 20 IN FEET SCALE • li!,4 11 EOGE Of ICE 1-13-25 217 aS7.3 Sign Setbacks: Sign #2 (No Variance Request) From Survey (Exhibit A, 2) CITY OF EDINA FEB 1 8 2025 PLANN!!NG DEPARTMENT I- -I think 13 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com DIGITAL SIGNS Page 99 of 492 CITY OF EDINA PLANNING OPPAPT^ANIT 14 r -I think ThinkDigitalSigns.com Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Sign Setbacks: Location #3 Requesting Variance for Height > 51' Setback from Pond 15' Width of Sign (with columns) 10' Setback from Fence DIGITAL SIGNS J Page 100 of 492 Viewing Perspective from Entrance Ramp (Height 14' from grade/8' from roadway) CITY OF EDINA r .....8r11. .hr '% . ........ •••• .'.;., . ... . , ..0 . ft. 4,4 ...- .., ,... 4 • at "' .., . : 14 . :S i: 7 .4 7: t it .... , c. 411. :i , t.4 4 4, 1 • " ',L.:Zif- '.7.1 - ',.. • .., ,... e • t A % '- • . 71:1;1. " .--.1 , ,...••• t - . :14 , IL . . ['tr.' • ...• A ,' * llis ' ' ' ; 4 116, 1.1 ' : 7 . : 1:. , ...•• 4, V' - • • ' ' - b.. ' • ' 1 4. .1.• ... , 2 4 ' ..% ,* • .... ' . . 4 '•' • .4' ' 'W.. 6 • • , .1 ' . .'.:'" 1,,, .. „•... .. I,. • . ••.. „,.a1/4 - - ZYr . . tn.: .- • • . •. 4r, d .. ' ..... ..,,s, ata110111411100141.'" ' ' '' . '''' • 4:1/4. '''. ,!111*...‘.'•-; ........ •7;‘-cletng42/V.:11C -a‘'......At Ifili) ' ' ..". . . - . A'• r . - . 4, • --.-- ,...-.....r.,r7........ -••• _ • _ . . .. think Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com L DIGITAL SIGNS J Page 101 of 492 S3POST cti)4 PROPOSED GN N N N a 855.9 SIGN POST 1352.7 a 8153.15 _8.55 a 853.3 PROPERTY LINE 206,xf _ Sign Area is ''6' Lower than the Centerline of Westbound Hwy. 62 a 893.3 a 657.8 857,1 .1-875772 860.6 /17 r think L DIGITAL SIGNS 16 Elevations: Sign #3 Sign Location Elevation 854', Road Elevation 860' From Survey (Exhibit A, 3) 854.1 5 FT CJ AINLINK FENCE S84 *58 145 "E /59.89 —8852.1 BeroM,N o ", STA 7-67--/wyNo. CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 PLANNING DEPARTMHN 1" Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Thin kDigitalSigns.com Page 102 of 492 17 I- -I think ThinkDigitalSigns.com Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 Approximation of Sign #3 (3' x 12' ^'14' High): Facing Westbound Traffic on 62 CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 7.LAN!NIING DEPAM DIGITAL SIGNS Page 103 of 492 r- think ThinkDigitalSigns.com Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 18 je114 ,) Wal-Mr/a,dr k Jr MY rliml en--T-ra“ ' TY OF EDIN • L. ClIGITAL SIGNS Looking Back - Sign #3 Facing Westbound Traffic on 62 (-6' road to sign location) Page 104 of 492 — • - ri'[>507 to NWL (Normal Water Level 7. 052 7 • B5,1_ — — _ 853.8 CITY OF EDINA FEB 18 2025 P!..ANNING Dr=0 ^-- Setbacks: Sign #3 Meets Setback from NWL From Survey (Exhibit A, 3) NWL 84b,2 Orr OF EDINA .1. HA !I. .1 N N 14 1633.3 PRopuiry I ow I— —I think 19 Mike Kasbohm 612-719-1990 ThinkDigitalSigns.com DIGITAL SIGNS Page 105 of 492 Page 106 of 492 Page 107 of 492 Page 108 of 492 © WSB & Associates 2013 6200 Colonial Way Parcels Mailing Parcels March 21, 2025 Map Powered By DataFi / 1 in = 130 ft Page 109 of 492 EdinaMN.gov Sign Height Variance and Sign Setback from OHWE Variance 6200 Colonial Way Page 110 of 492 Page 111 of 492 Site Photos Page 112 of 492 Variance Request Sign #1 •Setback from OHWE Page 113 of 492 Variance Request Sign #3 •Sign Height Variance Page 114 of 492 Page 115 of 492 Staff Recommendation Approve the requested variances to allow the setback from the ordinary high-water elevation of sign 1 to be at least 20 feet and to allow sign 3 to be 14 feet in height based on the following findings: 1.The criteria for the proposed sign variances are met. The request is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2.The proposed monument sign 3 would sit 8 feet taller than the centerline elevation of HWY 62 to allow for visibility. 3.There are circumstances that are unique to the property and are not common in similarly zoned properties. The body of water is located entirely on the subject property and the water elevation sits lower than the proposed sign location and won’t negatively impact the body of water. 4.The proposed signage4 is reasonable and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the sign plans submittal date stamped February 18, 2025. 2.Separate sign permits are required for each proposed sign. 3.The sign must comply with Sec.36-1655 Illuminated Signs. Page 116 of 492 •Sec.36-1655 Illuminated signs shall comply with the following requirements: 1.No sign shall change in either color or in intensity of light more frequently than once per hour, except signs giving time, date, temperature or weather information. 2.All incandescent bulbs or fluorescent tubes, except neon, LED or fiber optic light sources, shall be shielded with an opaque or translucent material. 3.No sign which is visible from a residential district, located within 200 feet of the sign, shall be illuminated between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; provided, however, such signs may be illuminated at any time when the use identified by the sign is open for business. 4.The planner may specify additional restrictions regarding the hours of illumination as a condition to the issuance of a permit. Page 117 of 492 Compliance Table Freestanding Signs located in the R-1 District Sign Standards Size Height Setback Sign Code: 1 freestanding sign per frontage 36 square feet 8 feet 20 feet to the curb 50 feet from ordinary high water elevation (OHWE) Sign 1: 36 square feet 8 feet 20 feet to curb 20 feet to OHWE* Sign 2: 36 square feet 8 feet 20 feet to curb N/A to OHWE Sign 3: 36 square feet 14 feet*20 feet to curb >50’ to OHWE Page 118 of 492 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: March 26, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Planning Commission Agenda Number: 7.3 Prepared By: Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Item Title: Rezoning, Subdivision, Site Plan with Variances at 5100 Eden Avenue for Opus Action Requested: Recommend the City Council Approve the Rezoning, Subdivision, Site Plan and Variances. Information/Background: Opus Development Company, LLC is proposing to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot office building to construct a new approximately 112,000 square foot office building at 5100 Eden Avenue. The plan includes the potential for retail space on the first level. To accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. Rezoning from Planned Office District 1 to Planned Commercial District 2. 2. Subdivision approval of a new plat to consolidate seven parcels into one. 3. Site Plan approval. 4. A variance for the following building setbacks: a. West (Arcadia): 21 feet where 35 feet is required b. North: 4 feet where 25 feet is required c. East: 11 feet where 25 feet is required d. South: 2 feet where 25 feet is required 5. A variance to allow FAR at 2 where 1.5 is permitted. 6. A variance to allow building height at 81 feet where up to 48 feet is permitted. 7. A variance from the requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm. 8. A variance from the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment. Supporting Documentation: 1. Planning Commission Staff Report 2. Engineering Memo 3. Transportation Memo 4. Site Location, Zoning, Comprehensive Plan & Grandview Plans 5. Site Plan Revision 6. Key Pages Grandview Framework 7. Applicant Plans and Narrative 8. Traffic and Parking Study 9. Stormwater Management Report 10. Edina Sustainable Building Questionnaire 11. GrandView Development Framework - Full Document 12. Staff Presentation 13. Applicant Presentation Page 119 of 492 Page 120 of 492 March 26, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator Rezoning, Subdivision, Site Plan with Variances at 5100 Eden Avenue for Opus Information / Background: Opus Development Company, LLC is proposing to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot office building to construct a new approximately 112,000 square foot office building at 5100 Eden Avenue. The plan includes the potential for retail space on the first level. To accommodate the request, the following would be required: 1. Rezoning from Planned Office District 1 to Planned Commercial District 2. 2. Subdivision approval of a new plat to consolidate seven parcels into one. 3. Site Plan approval. 4. A variance for the following building setbacks: a. West (Arcadia): 21 feet where 35 feet is required b. North: 4 feet where 25 feet is required c. East: 11 feet where 25 feet is required d. South: 2 feet where 25 feet is required 5. A variance to allow FAR at 2 where 1.5 is permitted. 6. A variance to allow building height at 81 feet where up to 48 feet is permitted. 7. A variance from the requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm. 8. A variance from the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment. Page 121 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Roadway exit ramp; The Hilltop restaurant; zoned PCD-2, Planned Commercial District and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Easterly: Highway 100. Southerly: Our Lady of Grace; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Public/Semi Public. Westerly: Vacant city owned property; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.36 acres in size and contains an existing four-story office building and surface parking. Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Zoning: POD-1, Planned Office District Comprehensive Plan Guidance The site is guided Mixed-Use Center in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation applies to two areas within the City – Grandview and 50th & France. Office and retail are considered primary uses within this designation. The table below provides further development guidance. Page 122 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 3 Additionally, the land use chapter of the Comprehensive Plan includes community design guidelines intended to help the City achieve its vision. These guidelines include the following: •Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings rather than between buildings and the street. •Encourage successful mixed-use development – As shown in the future land use section of this chapter, many of Edina’s commercial, office and industrial districts are evolving towards a greater degree of mixed-use. The land use plan encourages this evolution by defining land use categories that encourage combinations of compatible uses. Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses. •Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. •Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. •Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. •Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. •Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) Grandview Development Framework The Grandview Development Framework was completed in 2012 and is part of the Comprehensive Plan. The full document is attached for reference. It provides a vision and general guidance on change in the Grandview District. The site is guided mixed-use center where a combination of neighborhood commercial, office and medium- to high-density residential is envisioned. Page 14 states the following regarding land use: The future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. The plan Page 123 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 4 emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/Highway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and office buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fields, a significant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district. Both the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Development Framework place an emphasis on creating a vibrant and walkable mixed-use district within Grandview. As noted later in this report, the site is in close proximity to transit with 7-day/week service and significant regional connections. The proposed development provides parking that is mostly screened and underground, which enhances the aesthetics of the district and makes efficient use of land and infrastructure. It would deliver on the goal of providing vertical mixed-use if retail/commercial is included on the ground floor, as well as structured parking, and having the height of the building step down near the intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue. Opus is a company with a national presence, with other offices in Austin, Chicago, Denver, Des Moines, Indianapolis, Kansas City, and Phoenix. Opus has indicated that this site would serve as its corporate headquarters, furthering Edina’s strong reputation as a desirable location for business. In addition, the project would result in a significant financial investment in the property and enhance the tax base. Site Circulation/Traffic The site would continue to have vehicular access from Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue as it does today. The Arcadia access will function as the primary drop-off point and provide access to the lobby and ground-level amenities while the Eden access will be used for both parking access and service vehicles, with access to loading and trash areas. The site is located in close proximity to on/off ramps for Highway 100, minimizing traffic on local roadways. A traffic study done by Stantec concluded that there would be minimal impact to the adjacent roadways. No roadway improvements are recommended. (See attached traffic study.) For pedestrian access, the plans indicate that 8-foot sidewalks would be provided along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue with a 6-foot boulevard. The sidewalk is currently 8 feet along Eden and tapers from 8 to 6 feet along Arcadia. Transit The site is located within a quarter mile of transit stops for Metro Transit Bus Route 46, which provides connections to other regionally significant transit routes, including the future E-Line BRT, Orange Line BRT, D-Line BRT, and Blue Line LRT. Route 46 provides transit service 7-days per week, including weekdays (6:25am – 10:13pm about every half-hour) and weekends (7:45am – 10:15pm (about every half-hour to an hour). Metro Transit is also considering rush hour trips that would connect to the Opus Green Line LRT station in Minnetonka when that service begins. Page 124 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 5 Parking The proposed plans indicate a total of 330 parking stalls. The proposed building contains approximately 101,609 square feet of gross floor area for office and 5,864 square feet of gross floor area for another commercial use that is to be determined. For office, the code requires one space per 350 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock, but no more than one space per 200 square feet. This would require 291 parking spaces. For the remaining 5,864 square feet, if the use is an office use, one space per 350 square feet is required, which would require an additional 17 spaces for a total of 308. If the use is a retail use, one space per 250 square feet is required, which would require an additional 24 spaces for a total of 315. If the space were a restaurant, one space per 100 square feet is required, which would require an additional 59 stalls for a total of 350. Sec. 36-1324 lists the following reductions for off-street parking requirements that may be utilized jointly or separately except as indicated otherwise: •Transit - The required number of spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent if the building is located within one-quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop; to qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. •Bicycle Parking – A ten percent reduction in parking may be approved by the City Planner or the City planner’s designee provided that one of the following conditions are met: o If a retail or service use: one covered, long-term bicycle parking space per 5,000 square feet of retail or service uses. ▪In order to qualify for this reduction, the long term bicycle parking must: •Be protected from weather and from access by unauthorized persons; •Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that they cannot be easily removed; and •Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an upright position using a standard U-lock. o 1 short-term bike space per 5,000 square feet of retail/service uses. The site is within a quarter mile of transit stops for Metro Transit Bus Route 46, which provides 7- day per week service and provides connections to other regionally significant transit routes. The building will also have an indoor bike storage facility. Exact details on the bike racks within the facility are not known at this time; however, with 330 proposed stalls, even if only the 10% reduction for transit is applied, the proposed building is compliant with the number of stalls required regardless of the use for the remaining 5,864 square feet. If Offi ce If Retai l If Restaurant 101,609 sq. ft. offi ce 291 291 291 5,864 sq. ft. TBD 17 24 59 Subtotal 308 315 350 10% Reducti on 30.8 31.5 35 Tot al St al l s Requi red 278 284 315 St al l s Requi red Based on Fi rst Floor Use Page 125 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 6 Landscaping Code Section 36-1438 requires one overstory tree per 40 feet of site perimeter. With a site perimeter of 954 feet, 24 trees are required. The applicant is proposing 24 trees primarily along the Arcadia Ave and Eden Ave sides of the property. A full complement of perennials, grasses, and shrubs is also included. Building Design/Building Materials Per Section 36-618, (11), the following is required: a. All new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. The proposed building complies with this requirement with 89% transparency along Arcadia Avenue and 90+% along Eden Avenue. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). The building does not include any brick or stone on the first vertical 60 feet and therefore a variance is being requested. The requirement applies to non-glass surfaces. The primary exterior material is glass. The applicant is proposing a metal panel with a wood-like appearance on the ground level. The upper floors are almost entirely glass with a small amount of metal panel. c. No building facade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. The length of the upper floors of the building on the north side is approximately 223 feet; the building changes direction on the ground level. (See attached building renderings.) d. First floors must have a minimum ceiling height of 20 feet. The first-floor ceiling height is 20 feet and complies with this requirement. Screening (Mechanical Equipment / Trash Enclosure) Sec. 36-1457 requires that all mechanical equipment and trash storage areas be screened from all lot lines and streets. The plans show a rooftop mechanical area that will be completely screened as required by code. A trash enclosure is proposed within the building. There is a ground level transformer and generator proposed in the northwest corner. Since this equipment exceeds 36 square feet, it is required to meet the building setback and have all screening on private property. Page 126 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 7 The proposed equipment does not meet the required building setback, and a portion of the screening is proposed within the right-of-way; therefore, a variance is being requested. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in their review memo. (See attached memo dated March 21, 2025.) Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Signage Separate sign permits would be required for any signage. Signage allowed in the PCD-2 district is as follows per Section 36-1714 of the Zoning Ordinance: Maximum Wall Sign Area Maximum Number Freestanding Signs Maximum Area for Freestanding Signs Maximum Height 15% of wall area One per building 80 square feet 8 feet Preliminary/Final Plat The subject property is made up of seven small parcels all held in common ownership. The proposal is to simply combine all the lots into one lot. The City is authorized by statute to collect park dedication fees to support the additional demand for parks created by new development when property is platted. The City has studied this demand and concluded that new projects generally create additional park demand of approximately $7,1000 per buildable acre (43,560 square feet). For this project, that would be a total of an additional 74,000 square feet. The applicant would be tearing down 38,000 square feet of office space and building 112,000 square feet; an addition of 74,000 square feet, therefore, a park dedication of $9,656 would be required for the 1.36-acre site. Page 127 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 8 Compliance Table POD-1 PCD-2 PUD (Previously Approve Plan) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – Arcadia Avenue Side street - Eden Avenue Side street – North Side street – East 75 ft (Building Height) 75 ft (Building Height) 75 ft (Building Height) 75 ft (Building Height) 35 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet* (45 feet to curb) 10 feet* & 34 feet 10 feet* 12 feet* 21 feet (26 feet to curb)* 2 feet (32 feet to curb)* 4 feet* 11 feet* Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Four Stories and 48 feet Seven Stories & 82 feet* Five Stories & 81 feet* Building Coverage Floor Area Ratio 30% .5 N/A 1.5 68%* 3.2* 64% 2* Parking Stalls Office – 1/300 s.f. Retail – Not permitted Office – 1/350 s.f. = 282.6 stalls Retail – 1/250 s.f. = 27.6 stalls (10% reduction due to proximity to transit) Total = 280 stalls 165 spaces 330 First floor building height 20 feet 20 feet 13 feet*20 feet Proximity to R-1 used for residential purposes Twice the building height – 328 feet Twice the building height – 150 feet 800+ feet 800+ feet Building material First floor transparency Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. 75% transparency on first level facing the public realm. Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. 75% transparency on first level facing the public realm. Per the plans. Brick 60 feet tall on corners and base* 75% Commercial and 35% residential Glass, metal panel* 89% *Requires variance Page 128 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 9 Rezoning to from POD-1 to PCD-2 Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the commission may recommend approval of a rezoning based upon, but not limited to the following factors: 1. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided Mixed Use Center in the Comprehensive Plan, which lists retail, office, service, multifamily, and institutional uses as primary uses. The PCD-2 district allows all of these uses. Staff find that the proposed rezoning and proposed project would advance Comprehensive Plan goals, specifically to create a vibrant and pedestrian oriented mixed- use district in the Grandview area. The proposal specifically aligns well with the following Comprehensive Plan goals: Land Use Goal 1: Encourage infill and redevelopment that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. 1. Endeavor to accommodate private redevelopment in targeted potential areas of change, consistent with future land use guidance. 2. In reviewing development proposals, examine how land use and transportation are integrated to ensure that new development and redevelopment expand nonmotorized travel options that reduce the need for automobile travel. Land Use Goal 5: Support and enhance commercial and mixed-use areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. 1. Recognize and support commercial, office, and industrial job centers that draw workers from the city and across the region. 2. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. Land Use Goal 6: Ensure that the public realm design respects community character, supports commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 2. Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; Opus estimates that the building would be occupied by about 300 employees daily. The presence of 300 people (likely with well-paying jobs) into the district during the daytime hours would contribute to economic health of surrounding properties and vibrancy of the area. Workers of the office building would be within walking distance of numerous businesses and institutions including but not limited to Caribou, City Hall, Davanni’s, Edina Library, Edina Liquor, Grandview Tire & Auto, The Hilltop, Jerry’s, Starbucks, Starling, UPS, Walgreens, Wells Fargo, and potentially a future restaurant at the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue. Page 129 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 10 3. Will not result in an overly intensive land use; The proposed project should not result in an overly intensive land use. As documented in the variance analysis, the proposed setbacks, height, and massing are consistent with recently approved projects. The traffic study done by Stantec concludes that the project would have a minimal impact on the roadways and no roadway improvements would be necessary. 4. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The traffic study done by Stantec concludes that there would be minimal impact to the adjacent roadways. No roadway improvements are recommended. (See attached traffic study.) 5. Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and Variances have been requested for the provisions where the proposed project does not comply with the zoning ordinance. The proposed project conforms to all other provisions of the zoning ordinance and other applicable provisions of the City Code. 6. Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. The proposed project will be an improvement to the public realm by providing interesting and attractive facades that engage the street and enhancing the landscaping and green space from what exists today. The proposed building is consistent in size and scale with other recently approved projects in the area as documented in the variance analysis. Variance Analysis Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: Variance #1 – A variance for the following building setbacks: West (Arcadia): 21 feet where 35 feet is required North: 4 feet where 25 feet is required East: 11 feet where 25 feet is required South: 2 feet where 25 feet is required 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Section 36-1 states that the overall intent of the zoning ordinance is to implement the stated goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan so as to provide for the orderly and planned development and redevelopment of lands and waters in the city, to maintain an attractive living and working environment in the city, to preserve and enhance the high quality residential character of the city and to promote the public health, safety and Page 130 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 11 general welfare. More specifically, setback requirements are intended to prevent overcrowding of buildings. Staff find that the requested variances for building setbacks are consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. The ordinance says that an intended purpose of the ordinance is to implement the comprehensive plan. The design guidelines in the land use chapter of the comprehensive plan state that, where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment and encourages placement of buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. If the setback requirements were adhered to, the likely outcome would be a building set further back with a parking lot in front, which would not achieve the type of pedestrian environment envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Development Framework. The proposed building provides engaging frontages along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. Additionally, staff does not believe that the proposed setbacks will result in overcrowding of buildings. Along the Eden side, a 2-foot setback is proposed, however, only a corner of the building is this close. The setback increases moving along the façade. The building is also only one story at this point and there is approximately 30 feet of right-of-way between the property line and the edge of the street. Along the Arcadia side, is where the greatest setback is proposed at 21 feet. Although the building is taller along this side, it is the shorter dimension of the taller portion of the office building. The longer dimension of the taller portion of the office building is adjacent to MnDOT right-of-way, providing additional buffer to the building to the north (the right-of-way is approximately 60 feet wide). The east side of the building is also adjacent to MnDOT right-of-way where there is approximately 70+ feet to the edge of the roadway. With the upcoming Zoning Ordinance Update, building setback amendments to the current requirements will be considered. 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As noted above, staff believe the variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as the proposed setbacks and overall design of the building align well with the design guidelines in the land use chapter and the Grandview Development Framework. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed setbacks are reasonable and generally consistent with other recent approvals for developments in the area including the Avidor (4 feet from Eden Avenue), the most recently approved plan for the former public works site at 5146 Eden Avenue (5 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue), and the previous Page 131 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 12 approval for a multi-family building at this site (10 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue). ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. At 1.36 acres, the site is smaller than would be ideal for a modern office building. The required setbacks further reduce the usable area of the property by 40%. The applicant states that working within the remaining area would not allow for a marketable floor plate for a modern office building with structured parking. The irregular shape of the property contributes to these difficulties. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances would not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed building would actively engage the street frontages along Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue and enhance the pedestrian environment above the existing conditions. As noted already, the setbacks are not inconsistent with other recently approved projects. Variance #2 – A variance to allow an FAR at 2 where 1.5 is permitted 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Section 36-1 states that the overall intent of the zoning ordinance is to implement the stated goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan so as to provide for the orderly and planned development and redevelopment of lands and waters in the city, to maintain an attractive living and working environment in the city, to preserve and enhance the high quality residential character of the city and to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. More specifically, the FAR requirement is intended to limit the size of buildings. In general, staff find that the proposed project will advance Comprehensive Plan goals to create a vibrant and pedestrian oriented mixed-use district. The proposed project will enhance the activeness of the surrounding area from the existing conditions. The FAR proposed at 2 is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (3.2). 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff find the variance for FAR contributes to the project’s ability to advance Comprehensive Plan goals, specifically to create a vibrant and pedestrian oriented mixed- use district. The applicant is proposing structured parking to make efficient use of the land. Structured parking is expensive and requires a proportional amount of floor area to be financially feasible. The additional floor area allows for more people to be employed at the Page 132 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 13 site. Opus estimates that the building would be occupied by about 300 employees daily. The presence of 300 people (likely with well-paying jobs) in the district during the daytime hours would contribute to the vibrancy and economic health of the area. Workers of the office building would be within walking distance of numerous businesses and institutions including but not limited to Caribou, City Hall, Davanni’s, Edina Library, Edina Liquor, Grandview Tire & Auto, The Hilltop, Jerry’s, Starbucks, Starling, UPS, Walgreens, Wells Fargo, and potentially a future restaurant at the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Staff find the proposed FAR to be reasonable given the investment in structured parking. The FAR proposed at 2 is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (3.2). ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. At 1.36 acres, the applicant has stated the site is smaller than ideal for a modern office building. The applicant has stated that a minimum-sized floor plate is necessary for the space to be marketable. The small lot size combined with the floor area necessary to justify the investment in structured parking and allow for a marketable floor plate contributes to a higher FAR. With strict adherence to the zoning ordinance, the likely outcome would be a much smaller building with at least half of the lot area allocated to surface parking. The property is also unique in that it was given preliminary approval for a multi-family residential proposal in 2023 with FAR at 3.2. The proposed FAR at 2 is significantly less than what was already approved for the site. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances would not alter the essential character of the locality. The FAR proposed at 2 is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (3.2). Variance #3 – A variance to allow building height at 81 feet where up to 48 feet is permitted 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Page 133 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 14 Section 36-1 states that the overall intent of the zoning ordinance is to implement the stated goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan so as to provide for the orderly and planned development and redevelopment of lands and waters in the city, to maintain an attractive living and working environment in the city, to preserve and enhance the high quality residential character of the city and to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. More specifically, the height limit is intended to prevent overcrowding of buildings. Staff believe the proposed project will advance comprehensive plan goals as already stated in this report. The proposed project will enhance the activeness of the surrounding area from the existing conditions. The proposed height at 81 feet is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (80 feet / 6 stories), Maison Green (76 feet / 7 stories), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (83 feet / 6.5 stories), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (82 feet / 7 stories). It should also be noted that the building height limit of 4 stories and 48 feet was not adjusted after the city adopted the requirement for 20 foot first-floor ceiling heights. This would leave only 28 feet for the remaining three floors of a four-story building. Therefore, even a four-story building would likely require a height variance if complying with the requirement for 20 foot first-floor ceiling height. Again, with the upcoming Zoning Ordinance Update, building height amendments to the current requirements will be considered. 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff find the variance for building height contributes to the project’s ability to advance Comprehensive Plan goals, specifically to create a vibrant and pedestrian oriented mixed- use district in the Grandview area. The applicant is proposing structured parking to make efficient use of the land. Structured parking is expensive and requires a proportional amount of floor area to be financially feasible. The additional height allows for increased floor area, which allows for more people to be employed at the site. Opus estimates that the building would be occupied by about 300 employees daily. The presence of 300 people (likely with well-paying jobs) in the district during the daytime hours would contribute to the vibrancy and economic health of the area. Workers of the office building would be within walking distance of numerous businesses and institutions including but not limited to Caribou, City Hall, Davanni’s, Edina Library, Edina Liquor, Grandview Tire & Auto, The Hilltop, Jerry’s, Starbucks, Starling, UPS, Walgreens, Wells Fargo, and potentially a future restaurant at the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Avenue. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Page 134 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 15 Staff find the proposed height at 81 feet to be reasonable given the investment in structured parking. The height is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (80 feet / 6 stories), Maison Green (76 feet / 7 stories), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (83 feet / 6.5 stories), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (82 feet / 7 stories). ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. At 1.36 acres, the applicant has stated the site is smaller than ideal for a modern office building. The applicant has stated that a minimum-sized floor plate is necessary for the space to be marketable. The small lot size combined with the floor area necessary to justify the investment in structured parking and allow for a marketable floor plate contributes to the need for additional height. With strict adherence to the zoning ordinance, the likely outcome would be a much smaller building with at least half of the lot area allocated to surface parking. The property is also unique in that it was given preliminary approval for a multi-family residential proposal in 2023 with height at 82 feet. The proposed height is consistent with what was already approved for the site. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance for building height would not alter the essential character of the locality. As stated, the height is consistent with what has been approved for other projects in the area. Additionally, the orientation of the building minimizes the impact of the height along Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue. The shorter dimension of the tall portion of the building is adjacent to Arcadia while the longer dimension is setback 90 feet from Eden. Variance #4 – A variance from the requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm is intended to result in the use of quality building materials and attractive buildings. In general, the façade is primarily glass so the requirement would apply to all non-glass surfaces. On the ground level, the primary material other than glass is metal panel with a wood-like appearance. The upper floors are almost entirely glass. Therefore, the metal panel serves as more of an accent material than a primary material. The ordinance encourages a high amount of glass with the 75% transparency requirement, which this project complies with. Page 135 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 16 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages façade articulation, visual interest, and a high percentage of window transparency on the ground floor. Despite the lack of brick or stone, staff believe the proposed design achieves this with the high amount of glass and attractive frontage. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Despite that the proposed building does not comply with the requirement for stone or brick materials on the first 60 feet, staff find the materials proposed will result in an attractive building and find the materials proposed to be reasonable for a modern office building. ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Buildings on most other properties do not incorporate as much glass as is proposed for this building. Most recent development proposals do not comply with the requirement for 75% transparency on the ground level. The City adopted the requirement for brick or stone on the first 60 feet to prevent the use of less desirable materials as the primary building material. In this case, glass is the primary building material and metal panel is used sparingly, where brick or stone would otherwise be required. Exchanging the small amount of metal panel would not significantly alter the appearance of the building in this case. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The primary building material is glass with a limited amount of wood-looking metal panel. Exchanging the small amount of metal panel would not significantly alter the appearance of the building. Variance #5 – A variance from the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment 1.The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The intent of the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment is to maintain an attractive public realm. The applicant is proposing a transformer and generator on the northwest corner of the building. The equipment is tucked into a notch in the building that is generally well screened on all sides except for the generator that is unscreened facing the Page 136 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 17 Highway 100 frontage road to the north. Some of the required screening is proposed within the right-of-way. A proposed condition of approval is that all landscaping and screening within the right-of-way is to be maintained by the property owner. 2.The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages an attractive public realm. The proposed utility equipment will be well screened and not detract from the appearance of the area. 3.There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has stated there are limited options for where the equipment can be placed. By tucking the equipment into the notch in the building and with the proposed screening, the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to mitigate the impact of the equipment and meet the intent of the ordinance. ii.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The applicant has stated that the location of the equipment is a result of existing electrical service lines and the public utility’s preference for this location. iii.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant has proposed a reasonable plan for screening the equipment and will be responsible for maintaining all screening and landscaping. PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION •Is the proposed rezoning of the site from POD-1 to PCD-3, Planned Commercial District 3 reasonable? Yes. Staff supports the proposed rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided Mixed Use Center in the Comprehensive Plan, which lists retail, office, service, multifamily, and institutional uses as primary uses. The PCD-2 district allows all of these uses. Staff find that the proposed rezoning and proposed project would advance Comprehensive Plan goals, specifically to create a vibrant and pedestrian oriented mixed-use district in the Grandview area. Page 137 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 18 2. As outlined on pages 9-10 of this report, the proposal meets the criteria for rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, would not be detrimental to surrounding property, would benefit the commercial area with more employees in the area, and would be supported by existing roadways. 3. The mass of the building compared to the previously approved residential project for the site would be less. The floor area ratio (FAR) of the previous project was 3.2 compared to the current proposal of 2.0. (See at detailed comparison in the compliance table on page 8 of this report.) The FAR is also consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), and the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09). 4. The PCD-2 Zoning is consistent with the PCD-2 Zoning of properties to the north and northwest. •Are the proposed Variances justified? Yes, staff believes the requested variances are justified for the following reasons: 1. As demonstrated on pages 10-17, staff believe the variance criteria per Chapter 36 of the City Code is met. Findings include: The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance; the circumstances unique to the property were not created by the landowner; the right-of-way width of 30 feet along Eden Avenue; the site abuts Highway 100 on the east side and is buffer by trees in the right- of-way; the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the area. 2. The proposed setbacks are generally consistent with other recent approvals for developments in the area including the Avidor (4 feet from Eden Avenue), the most recently approved plan for the former public works site at 5146 Eden Avenue (5 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (10 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue). 3. The mass of the building compared to the previously approved residential project for the site would be less. The floor area ratio (FAR) of the previous project was 3.2 compared to the current proposal of 2.0. The FAR is also consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), and the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09). 4. The proposed height at 81 feet is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (80 feet / 6 stories), Maison Green (76 feet / 7 stories), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (83 feet / 6.5 stories), and the previous approval for a multi- family building at this site (82 feet / 7 stories). 5. The requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm is intended to result in the use of quality Page 138 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 19 building materials and attractive buildings. In general, the façade is primarily glass so the requirement would apply to all non-glass surfaces. On the ground level, the primary material other than glass is metal panel with a wood-like appearance. The upper floors are almost entirely glass. Therefore, the metal panel serves as more of an accent material than a primary material. The ordinance encourages a high amount of glass with the 75% transparency requirement, which this project complies with. Exchanging the small amount of metal panel would not significantly alter the appearance of the building in this case. 6. The intent of the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment is to maintain an attractive public realm. There are limited options for where the utility equipment can be placed, due to the location of the existing electrical service lines. The applicant has proposed a reasonable plan for screening the equipment and will be responsible for maintaining all screening and landscaping. Staff Recommendation Recommend the City Council approve the request for Rezoning from POD-1 to PCD-2, Site Plan, and the requested Variances based on the findings below. A case can be made for or against individual variances. If the Planning Commission does not believe that the statutory criteria have been met for a particular variance, specific findings should be made to deny that variance. The variances can be considered by the Planning Commission with separate motions to approve or deny. If any variances are denied, the applicant may choose to revise the site plan to address the denials and come back to the Planning Commission for review. If not, the denial recommendations would be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Findings for approval: The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. 1. The variance criteria in Section 36-98 of the City Code is met: a. The variances would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. b. The variances would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. c. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance; the circumstances unique to the property were not created by the landowner; the right-of-way width of 30 feet along Eden Avenue; the site abuts Highway Page 139 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 20 100 on the east side and is buffer by trees in the right-of-way; the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the area. 3. The proposed setbacks are generally consistent with other recent approvals for developments in the area including the Avidor (4 feet from Eden Avenue), the most recently approved plan for the former public works site at 5146 Eden Avenue (5 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (10 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue). 4. The mass of the building compared to the previously approved residential project for the site would be less. The floor area ratio (FAR) of the previous project was 3.2 compared to the current proposal of 2.0. The FAR is also consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), and the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09). 5. The proposed height at 81 feet is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (80 feet / 6 stories), Maison Green (76 feet / 7 stories), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (83 feet / 6.5 stories), and the previous approval for a multi- family building at this site (82 feet / 7 stories). 6. The requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm is intended to result in the use of quality building materials and attractive buildings. In general, the façade is primarily glass so the requirement would apply to all non-glass surfaces. On the ground level, the primary material other than glass is metal panel with a wood-like appearance. The upper floors are almost entirely glass. Therefore, the metal panel serves as more of an accent material than a primary material. The ordinance encourages a high amount of glass with the 75% transparency requirement, which this project complies with. Exchanging the small amount of metal panel would not significantly alter the appearance of the building in this case. 7. The intent of the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment is to maintain an attractive public realm. There are limited options for where the utility equipment can be placed, due to the location of the existing electrical service lines. The applicant has proposed a reasonable plan for screening the equipment and will be responsible for maintaining all screening and landscaping. 8. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided Mixed Use Center in the Comprehensive Plan, which lists retail, office, service, multifamily, and institutional uses as primary uses. The PCD-2 district allows all of these uses. 9. The proposal meets the criteria for rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance. The rezoning will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; will not result in an overly intensive land use; will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of the City Code; and provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Page 140 of 492 STAFF REPORT Page 21 Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Project must be constructed consistent with the proposed plans dated February 18, 2025, the revised Site Plan and the plans included in the May 6, 2025 City Council packet. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 4. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 6. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated March 21, 2025. 7. Compliance with the Stantec Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 8. Dedication of public access easements on the sidewalks. 9. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 11. Maintenance of sidewalks, public space, and all landscaping within the public right-of-way shall be responsibility of property owner. 12. Provision of code compliant exterior bike racks for the commercial use near the building entrance would be required at the time of permitting. 13. Park dedication fee of $9,656 would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Deadline for a City decision: June 23, 2025. Page 141 of 492 DATE: 3/20/2025 TO: 5100 Eden Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager RE: 5100 Eden Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included grading and utility drawings dated 02/24/2025. Review Comment Required For General 1. Existing easements held by the City require Council action to vacate if deemed appropriate and necessary for the project. Consideration of requests can require up to 60-days to process. General Comment 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks along all sides except Eden Avenue adjacent to the street will be the responsibility of the property owner. General Comment 4. Coordinate Arcadia Ave impacts and construction staging location with City Engineer and related to Vernon Ave / 50 th Street Interchange Project. Survey 5. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 5.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Public sidewalks outside the ROW will require easements. Private underground storm systems are not allowed in the ROW.. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 6. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 7. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 8. Public sidewalks along Eden and Arcadia to be minimum 8’ in width with a 5’ boulevard. Grading/Building Permit Page 142 of 492 9. Coordinate design and installation of a n ADA compliant pedestrian crossing treatment along Arcadia Avenue across the TH100 off ramp and median island with MnDOT and City. Review curb radii at the same time to potential reduce the radii to improve pedestrian safety. Traffic and Street 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 11. Implement recommendations from traffic study and transportation review memo. Grading/Building Permit 12. Staff recommends reducing parking requirements by 10% (315 stalls for office/restaurant use or 284 stalls for office/retail use) per Section 36-1324 of City Code due to the site’s proximity to transit stops. Grading/Building Permit 13. Implement five TDM strategies as required by the City’s Travel Demand Management Policy. Certificate of Occupancy 14. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 15. Arcadia Ave was constructed in 1970. Street repairs shall conform to standard plates 543. Eden Ave and roundabout was constructed in 2022 is bituminous and shall be repaired per standard plate 541. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 16. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 17. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 18. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 19. Coordinate utility disconnection limits with public works. Grading/Building Permit 20. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 20.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 20.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 21. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 22. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 23. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after Grading/Building Permit Page 143 of 492 main connection. 24. Watermain installed in1955. Site was developed as early as 1940. A private well may be located on site. Wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 25. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 26. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 27. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 28. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 29. Construction staging, contractor parking, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 30. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Grading/Building Permit 31. Landscaping within the right-of-way is to be maintained by the owner. 32. City recently paid to construct large block retaining wall. Developer may be required to remove, salvage and deliver large block retaining to the City. Developer to deliver at a location deemed appropriate by the City. Delivery location will be within the City limits. City still determining if the block can be salvaged and re-installed for other City projects. Certificate of Occupancy Sustainability 33. This project is not required to follow the Sustainable Buildings Policy. The project team is encouraged to complete the Sustainable Buildings Questionnaire, an optional form to communicate a project’s sustainable elements with staff, Planning Commission and City Council. If you need a copy of the questionnaire, please contact the Sustainability Manager. General Other Agency Coordination 34. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit Page 144 of 492 35. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit 36. Any proposed improvements within the TH100 ROW near the off ramp along the north side of the property shall be coordinated with MnDOT to determine if it will be allowed or not. Coordinate pork-chop removal and replacement. Grading/Building Permit Page 145 of 492 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Executive Summary Staff recommends the following actions related to the proposed redevelopment of 5100 Eden Ave:  The applicant must post information about adjacent transit routes and schedules in a public place within the building to qualify for a 10% reduction in required automobile parking.  The applicant should consider providing four (min.) surface bicycle parking stalls adjacent to the proposed retail/restaurant use.  Rack style and spacing for bicycle parking should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Purpose and Background Opus Development Company is proposing to redevelop 5100 Eden Ave, currently occupied by the Eden 100 building. The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing four-story, 38,000-square-foot office building with a five-story, 115,000-square-foot office building and a 6,600-square-foot commercial space. Stantec completed a traffic impact study (TIS) for this project on behalf of the City. This memo will review the findings of the TIS and provide additional transportation-related recommendations for the proposed development. Multi-Modal Facilities Sidewalks and Bikeways At the site, there are 5’ edge-of-curb sidewalks on:  Arcadia Ave from Highway 100 off-ramp to Eden Ave (along west property line)  Eden Ave from Arcadia Ave to Highway 100 (along south property line) Both of these sidewalks transition to 8’ shared-use paths as they approach the southwest corner of the Engineering Department EdinaMN.gov Date: March 21, 2025 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Chad Millner, Director of Engineering cc: 5100 Eden Avenue Owner and Development Team From: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Subject: 5100 Eden Avenue – Transportation Review Page 146 of 492 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 property. In the immediate vicinity, there are 5’-6’ sidewalks on Eden Ave, Normandale Rd and Arcadia Ave. There are no dedicated bikeways adjacent to the site. There is also an 8’ shared-use path west of the site on Eden Ave between Grandview Square and Arcadia Ave. The applicant is proposing the following sidewalks and bikeways on site:  8’ shared-use path on Arcadia Ave from Highway 100 off-ramp to Eden Ave (along west property line, replacing portions of existing 5’ sidewalk)  8’ shared-use path on Eden Ave from Arcadia Ave to Highway 100 (along south property line, replacing portions of existing 5’ sidewalk)  Internal sidewalk along north property line ranging from 4.5’- to 6’-wide The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan recommends standard bike lanes on Arcadia Ave from Gus Young Ln to Eden Ave and buffered bike lanes on Eden Ave from Vernon Ave to W 50th St. These facilities are not proposed for construction in the current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. Transit There are no transit stops adjacent to the site. There are transit stops for Metro Transit Local Route 46 within ½ mile of the site (less than a 10-minute walk) on Vernon Ave and Eden Ave which are accessible from existing sidewalks and paths. Trip Generation and Capacity Analysis Trip generation and capacity analysis was performed for the year 2028 when the project is expected to be completed. Weekday trips were estimated by:  Measuring existing traffic volumes (January 2025) at study intersections  Increasing existing traffic volumes by 0.3% per year to account for planned infrastructure improvements and expected growth in the area (including other approved or proposed redevelopment projects)  Adding new trips for the proposed uses based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition Stantec estimates that the redevelopment will generate 1,800 daily trips, with 180 during the a.m. peak hour and 217 during the p.m. peak hour. Four roadway corridors surrounding the site were studied by Stantec (W 50 th St/Vernon Ave, Eden Ave, Arcadia Ave, and Grange Rd), as well as 13 adjacent intersections along those corridors (see Figure 1). Page 147 of 492 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Figure 1: Study Intersections The following infrastructure improvements were also assumed to be completed by 2028:  Highway 100/Vernon Ave interchange reconstruction  Removal of southbound Highway 100 access ramp from Eden Ave Stantec’s modeling shows that all study intersections will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) C or better through both the 2028 Build and 2028 No Build scenarios. No intersection’s LOS is expected to decrease; the intersection of Eden Ave/Arcadia Ave is expected to improve from (LOS B to A) in both the 2028 Build and 2028 No Build a.m. peak hours. Based on this analysis, the proposed redevelopment will have minimal impact on the surrounding roadways through 2028 and no improvements are needed to accommodate the estimated traffic. Parking Analysis 324 underground and surface parking stalls are proposed for this site. Stantec evaluated parking demand using national data from ITE’s Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition and considered two scenarios for the proposed commercial space:  For office and restaurant uses, peak weekday parking demand is 277 stalls  For office and general retail uses, peak weekday parking demand is 242 stalls Page 148 of 492 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The proposed parking supply can accommodate either estimated demand. For office and restaurant uses, the proposed parking supply is 26 stalls fewer than the City’s requirement of 350. For office and general retail uses, the proposed parking supply is nine stalls greater than the City’s requirement of 315. Parking Reductions The site may qualify for a 10% reduction in the number of parking stalls required due to its proximity to transit stops for Metro Transit Local Route 46, which operates regularly seven days a week. The proposed perimeter shared-use paths will provide adequate pedestrian access between the stops and the building. To qualify for this reduction, the applicant must post information about adjacent transit routes and schedules in a public place within the building to encourage the use of transit. This would reduce the City’s requirements to 315 stalls for office/restaurant use and 284 stalls for office/general retail use; the proposed parking supply would accommodate either scenario. The site qualifies for a 10% reduction in the number of parking stalls for the restaurant or general retail use based on the proposed long-term bicycle parking. One long-term bicycle parking stall is required per 5,000 square feet of retail/service uses to qualify. The proposed 6,600-square-foot restaurant/retail space would require two stalls; 28 are proposed, satisfying the requirement. The area which would have been occupied by the eliminated parking spaces must be devoted to pervious surfaces, stormwater facilities, tree retention or native landscaping as directed by the City Planner or their designee. Bicycles The City requires bicycle parking stalls at 5% of the required automobile parking stalls, which equates to 18 stalls for office/restaurant use or 16 stalls for office/general retail use (if the parking reduction requirements noted above are met, the requirements would be 16 stalls or 14 stalls for the respective uses). As mentioned above, the applicant is proposing 28 underground bicycle parking stalls. The parking stalls are proposed to be in a convenient location within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. The applicant should consider providing surface parking stalls adjacent to the proposed retail/restaurant use; a minimum of four stalls are suggested. Rack style and spacing for bicycle parking should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Table 1 details the ways in which the proposed redevelopment supports current City transportation plans and policies. Page 149 of 492 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Table 1: Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Comprehensive Plan (2018) Goal Assessment 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses with a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single-occupancy vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicle trips and the use of alternative travel options. The project provides facilities that promote walking, biking and rolling. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high-performance transit service and connections. The applicant should provide information about adjacent transit services to satisfy the parking reduction requirement. 7. Develop and manage parking provisions to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride-sharing and bicycle parking. Site plan includes 28 underground bike parking stalls. The applicant should also consider providing surface parking stalls adjacent to the proposed retail/restaurant use; a minimum of four stalls are suggested. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). 14. Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. Proposed public shared-use paths along Arcadia Ave and Eden Ave will improve user safety and comfort. Living Streets Plan (2015) Principle Assessment 2. Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Page 150 of 492 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 4. The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. The project includes perimeter sidewalks that connect to existing facilities in the area. 9. Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. The proposed perimeter and internal sidewalks will improve mobility for users within and around the site. 13. Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life for the public. The wider pedestrian/bicycle facilities and boulevards on Arcadia Ave and Eden Ave will improve pedestrian safety and comfort adjacent to the property. Grandview District Development Framework (2012) Goals Assessment 2. Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles on Vernon, Eden and the local street network. The wider pedestrian/bicycle facilities and boulevards on Arcadia Ave and Eden Ave will improve pedestrian safety and comfort adjacent to the property. 13. Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. Travel Demand Management Policy (2021) Proposed Strategies (Tier 1 – min. 5 unique strategies identified)  Provide maps that show the area bus routes and schedules  Provide maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities  Provide information on starting and joining commuter programs  Provide bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users Suggested Additional Strategies  Provide surface bicycle parking adjacent to retail/restaurant use (four stalls minimum suggested)  Subsidize Metro Transit passes for employees Page 151 of 492 Site Page 152 of 492 SitePage 153 of 492 Page 154 of 492 Land Use Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential Page 155 of 492 Page 156 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 27 4/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape Page 157 of 492 Page 158 of 492 Page 159 of 492 123478BCDE56GHJ9FA48' - 6"2 ' - 6 "34' - 0"1 7 ' - 0 "11' - 9"14' - 0"15' - 5"198' - 10"22' - 0"9' - 0"19' - 3"123' - 10"22' - 6"14' - 0"37' - 6"29' - 9"2 1 ' - 0 "FRONTAGE ROADEDEN AVEARCADIA AVETERRACETERRACECOVERED BREEZEWAYOFFICE LOBBYCOMMERCIAL / OFFICELOADING(18' 0" CLR)NO PARKINGPARKINGDOWN TO LEVEL P1UP TO LEVEL 2EDGE OF BUILDING ABOVEDROP-OFFPRIMARY ENTRYRECEPTIONPARKINGENTRYPARKINGENTRYTRASHBIKESMONUMENT SIGNEDEN AVE36' - 6"PROJECT NUMBERORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/20/2025 10:25:27 AMA0-3SITE PLAN V22024-126402/04/255115 Arcadia Avenue5115 ArcadiaAvenueEdina, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION2/18/2025No. Description Date1/16" = 1'-0"A0-31SITE PLAN - LEVEL 01Page 160 of 492 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking NorthPage 161 of 492 1.Hope for Change Introduction Hope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration,participation, and planning.Thousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small)have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders,business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed officials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. The result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy,policy,and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable,memorable ways. Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process,December 2010 64/05/12 Page 162 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Land Use Plan ArcadiaAveHwy100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 154/05/12 Site Page 163 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use ArcadiaAveHwy100Illustrative M aster Plan Existing Buildings Potential Development Proposed Civic Community Buildings 164/05/12 Site Page 164 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 274/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape Site Page 165 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center ArcadiaAve324/05/12 Gus Young Ln Jerry’s Public Realm Vernon,Gus Young,Interlachen The plan recommends a number of street and traffic improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffic, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians.This is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing)and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor)that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern.Anchoring the public realm is the G r andView G reen,an approximately one-half +acre public space located on the north end of the public works site. 1.New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing). 2.GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area. 3.Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair. 4.Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed. 5.Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon. 6.Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements. 7.Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/ pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100. 8.Public steps of Arcadia. 1 GrandView Crossing 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 8SummitCommunity/ Civic Building City Parking Ramp Page 166 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Complete/Living Streets improvements Private streetscapes Split diamond interchange New /improved bridges 354/05/12 Transportation ArcadiaAveHwy100District Street Framework The movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” configuration. This approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. The existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffic would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term,there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffic access and circulation in the upper core of the District. Site Page 167 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking West 374/05/12 Site Page 168 of 492 5115 Arcadia Avenue – Speculative Multi-Tenants Office – Project Narrative 1. Project Introduction Opus is pleased to share our official Land Use Application with the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council. The package includes visioning and conceptual design for the exciting redevelopment opportunity at 5115 Arcadia Avenue (current address is 5100 Eden Avenue). The proposed project will play a major role in the City’s future goals for the Grandview neighborhood. Opus is proposing an approximately 112,000 square foot Class A speculative multi-tenant office building that activates the boulevard along Arcadia down to the southern corner of the street and maximizes the site’s full potential. In addition to providing a best- in-class solution to an area in need of functional office space, the project will feature a robust amenity package with underground parking, open concept lobby, individual tenant and community terraces, multi-tenant club room and ability for unique tenant opportunities on the first floor with a private patio. Along with the building amenities for tenants to enjoy, the public will benefit from the improved connection along Arcadia Avenue. The building frontage along Arcadia will feature a covered building entrance, a widened sidewalk for patrons and engaging landscape that includes seating opportunities. The newly constructed sidewalk will connect the neighborhood to nearby amenities in what is now an underutilized pedestrian area. Our team thoughtfully designed the building’s presence along this prominent avenue to synergize with the future Grandview Project at 5146 Eden Avenue. This site is an important puzzle piece to the overall goals for the Grandview District and we are excited to share our team’s vision. At a time when there are rarely any office developments, we are pleased to share that Opus will be the lead tenant in the building, relocating our operations from our current Minnetonka-based office to 5115 Arcadia Avenue. 2. Site Overview 5115 Arcadia Avenue is made up of seven adjacent parcels totaling 1.38 acres on the northeast quadrant of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There is an existing 38,678 SF office building on the site that was built in 1968. The current tenants are on short term leases or include rights to remove with notice. Many office buildings are being demolished or re-purposed for housing as functional obsolescence and market factors have been unfavorable for aged office buildings. However, office demand in highly desirable sub-markets with functional floor plates has proven to withstand headwinds against new development. The site is currently zoned Planned Office District-1 and will seek to be rezoned as a Planned Commercial Development to allow the project to maximize its full potential and flexibility with the first floor tenant space for additional office or a commercial/retail use. 3. Development Data The 5115 Arcadia project aspires to transform an obsolete office building and surface parking lot into a vibrant, dynamic place of employment that radiates energy and vitality. The site’s adjacency to Highway 100 and integration within a developing pedestrian-oriented neighborhood makes it ideally suited for an office development. This new office building will serve as the new Twin Cities home for The Opus Group along with space for other tenants. The office building, with parking spaces for 300 employees, will balance the recent and future residential development in the neighborhood, helping to enrich the mix of uses. By combining timeless materials and thoughtful design principles, the building will serve as a catalyst for activity and engagement in the area, enriching the urban fabric and elevating the aesthetic quality of the neighborhood. The proposed building design consists of six above-grade levels and two below-grade levels. A highly transparent Page 169 of 492 double-height lobby running the length of Arcadia and a jewel box commercial space on the southwest corner will help activate what is currently a rather forbidding streetscape. These active uses also serve to screen from view the above grade structured parking, resulting in the building appearing as five-stories when viewed from Arcadia and Eden. The streetscape and landscape design along the primary public street frontages of Arcadia and Eden address the challenge of the approximately 16-foot grade change from north to south. The primary building entrance toward the north end of Arcadia is clearly marked by a sculptural staircase that leads to a recessed, covered entrance. This recess provides access to a linear terrace that extends south for the entire length of the west façade and in turn provides access to the commercial space. The terrace, which is akin to a dock overlooking a lake, will be programmed for outdoor occupancy, helping to activate the adjacent streetscape. At the far southern end of the site, the sidewalk widens into a node with seating, providing a place for building occupants and the general public to gather and enjoy the weather on a pleasant day. The vehicular circulation design includes two curb cuts: one on Arcadia and another on Eden. The Arcadia entrance will function as the primary drop-off point and provide access to the lobby and ground-level amenities. Meanwhile, the Eden entrance/exit is used for both parking access and service vehicles, facilitating access to a loading and trash area. This arrangement reduces congestion from back-of-house operations. Two below-grade levels and two partial above grade parking levels will accommodate approximately 330 stalls. The building will provide over 100,000 rentable square feet of premium Class A office space, designed to accommodate multiple tenants with flexibility and modern amenities. On the second floor, tenants will have access to a dedicated indoor amenity space, designed to foster collaboration, relaxation, and productivity. This space will connect to a large rooftop balcony, offering expansive views and an inviting area for outdoor gatherings, breaks, or events. Each office level will include an outdoor terrace overlooking Arcadia and the building entrance below. This feature offers an opportunity to differentiate the building architecture at the southwest corner of the building. These outdoor areas not only enhance the tenants’ experience but also contribute to the overall aesthetic and environmental quality of the building, fostering a sense of openness and connection to the outdoors. Sustainability is a core tenet of Opus’s mission statement and will be incorporated into the design and execution of the project at every step. The building’s sustainability strategy starts with its solar orientation, with its longest facades facing north and south, minimizing solar gain from eastern and western exposures. Additionally, the building skin will be a high-performing curtain wall, the performance characteristics of which will be specifically tailored to each solar orientation. The exterior of the building will showcase a carefully curated palette of high-end materials, including architectural metal panels, and expansive glazing. The building’s fenestration is thoughtfully composed and contextually sensitive, establishing a design language that complements the architectural character of Edina. 4. Summary Opus is excited for the opportunity to be a part of the community’s overall vision for the Grandview neighborhood. In collaboration with our consultants and feedback from City staff, we believe the following package encapsulates the community’s desired outcome for the site. We look forward to working alongside the City of Edina and its stakeholders to drive this vision forward and build upon the City’s goals for this growing neighborhood. Page 170 of 492 Variance Narrative City of Edina required findings: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning code b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Setbacks: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, which is to create sufficient space between buildings and streets for boulevards, sidewalks, landscape buffers and other elements conducive to a pedestrian-oriented environment. The proposed design accommodates a robust pedestrian realm. The fact that the property line along Eden Ave is set back 30’ from the curb effectively obviates the need for a setback along this street. In addition, the footprint of the building is mitigated by the significant step backs above the first level on the south and north sides of the building. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the area around this site as one of a handful of “Potential Change Areas” where it is possible and desirable to increase density; decreasing setbacks is one way to further the goal of increased density. Additionally, the Plan’s Community Design Guidelines advocate that “facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment.” Particularly along Eden Avenue, compliance with the 25’ required setback would weaken the building’s relationship to the street, especially given the 30’ distance between the property line and the curb. In addition, the Grandview Development Framework includes several illustrations that appear to show much smaller setbacks than the zoning code requires. 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The 1.36 acre (59,402 sf) site is small by modern standards of real estate development. The required setbacks reduce the buildable area by 40% to 0.81 acres (35,576 sf). The irregular shape of the site creates additional difficulties for developing an office building with marketable floor plates and structured parking, both of which have specific dimensional requirements that are not conducive to acute angles. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning code. While the zoning code encourages the development of commercial and office uses in this area, the minimum required setbacks sufficiently restrict the development of the site into a modern office use with accessory parking. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The site dimensions and irregular shape are unique to the property. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed setbacks allow for generous pedestrian facilities and landscaping. Recent nearby developments such as Avidor Page 171 of 492 and Maison Green establish this district as one with building facades that define a street wall. The proposed development would be consistent with this character. Height: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. The proposed building design utilizes upper story step-backs to mitigate the impact of height on the pedestrian realm. The floor plates reduce from 37,016 GSF at Level 1 to 26,423 gsf on the upper levels. This massing strategy results in a 90’ step back at the south and a 15’ step back on the north above street level. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the area around this site as one of a handful of “Potential Change Areas” where it is possible and desirable to increase density. The Community Design Guidelines purposely do “not include specific guidance on building height in order to allow more flexibility in the development review process.” 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The Building Height Overlay Ordinance which restricts building heights in the Grandview District to four stories or 48’ implies that 12’ is an appropriate height for a story. For office buildings, 14’ is a common industry standard and 12’ is widely considered too low. Additionally, Edina’s zoning code requires the first floor of buildings to be 20’ tall, which also conflicts with the height ordinance. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning code. The proposed five story building is a reasonable use and is comparable to two other nearby buildings that are six stories (Avidor) and seven stories (Maison Green). Significant building step backs on the north and south serve to mitigate the building’s bulk. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The irregular shape of the site makes it difficult to make full use of the site for underground parking; as a result, a significant portion of the needed parking occurs above grade, pushing the four primary floors of office two stories above grade. In addition, the height limit of four stories of 12’ conflicts with the standard requirements of office buildings and ignores the city’s desire for taller first floor heights. c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Several nearby recent developments, such as the six-story Avidor and seven-story Maison Green, contribute to the character of this area as one composed of tall buildings. Floor Area Ratio: 1. The variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. The proposed FAR of 2.0 is 33% greater than the 1.5 maximum in PCD-2 zoning. Significant step backs on the north and south sides serve to mitigate building bulk. 2. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the area around this site as one of a handful of “Potential Change Areas” where it is possible and desirable to increase density. A modest increase in FAR of 33% over the base zoning seems an appropriate way to further this goal of increased density. 3. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. Page 172 of 492 a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning code. The modest proposed increase in FAR is a reasonable way to further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in increasing density within this Potential Change Area. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The restrictive FAR requirements of many standard zoning classifications are incompatible the stated goal of the Comprehensive Plan to increase density within Potential Change Areas. d. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Several nearby recent developments, such as the six-story Avidor and seven-story Maison Green, contribute to the character of this area as higher density. Additionally, there are no low-scale residential buildings nearby that would be negatively affected by the bulk of the proposed building. Page 173 of 492 PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/24/2025 11:39:54 AMT1-1TITLE SHEET 2024-1264 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 PROJECT TEAM 5115 Arcadia Avenue OWNER/DEVELOPER:Opus Development Company 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 5534 ARCHITECT:ESG Architecture & Design 350 North Fifth Street, Suite 401 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612-339-5508 CONTRACTOR:Opus Design Build 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 5534 CIVIL ENGINEER:Civil Site Group 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55422 Ph: 612-615-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:Damon Farber Landscape Architects 310 4th Ave Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-332-7522 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Meyer Borgman Johnson 510 Marquette Aveue South Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ph: 612-338-0713 DRAWING INDEX VICINITY SITE LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION BUILDING METRICS DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NAME 02/24/25ARCHITECTURAL T1-1 TITLE SHEET ● ARCHITECTURAL A0-1 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS ● A0-2 SITE PLAN ● A0-3 SITE SECTION DIAGRAMS ● A0-4 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS ● A0-5 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS ● A1-1 FLOOR PLANS - LEVELS P1-P2 ● A1-2 FLOOR PLANS - LEVELS 1-2 ● A1-3 FLOOR PLANS - LEVELS 3-6 ● A2-1 ELEVATIONS ● A2-2 ELEVATIONS ● A2-3 EXTERIOR MATERIALS ● CIVIL C0.0 CIVIL TITLE SHEET ● C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN ● C2.0 SITE PLAN ● C3.0 GRADING PLAN ● C4.0 UTILITY PLAN ● C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS ● C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS ● C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS ● SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS ● SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS ● SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS & NARRATIVE ● SW1.3 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS ● LANDSCAPE L1.0 TREE PROTECTION PLAN ● L2.0 MATERIALS PLAN ● L3.0 PLANTING PLAN ● L4.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ● ELECTRICAL E0.1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ● SURVEY V1.0 EXISTING SURVEY ● V1.1 EXISTING SURVEY ● V2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT ● No.Description Date Page 174 of 492 PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:42 AMA0-1EXISTING SITE PHOTOS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 NORTH-EAST EXISTING AERIAL PHOTOSOUTH-EAST EXISTING AERIAL PHOTO SOUTH-WEST EXISTING AERIAL PHOTONORTH-WEST EXISTING AERIAL PHOTO SOUTH EXISTING STREET VIEW PHOTO SOUTH-WEST EXISTING STREET VIEW PHOTO No.Description Date Page 175 of 492 4 A2-1 3 A2-1 1 A2-2 2 A2-2 MECHANICAL SCREENING ROOF BELOW HIGH ROOF ROOF BELOW 48' - 6"90' - 8"TERRACES BELOW 21' - 3"0"15' - 3"199' - 4"11' - 5"4' - 1"19' - 6"123' - 11"34' - 5" 1 6 ' - 1 0 " HWY 100 FRONTAGE ROAD 2 ' - 4 " 21' - 3" TERRACE BELOW ELEVATOR OVERRUN AND STAIR ACCESS 11' - 9" MONUMENT SIGN LOADING BERTHS MONUMENT SIGN PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION2/24/2025 11:39:43 AMA0-2SITE PLAN 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 1/16" = 1'-0"A0-2 2SITE PLAN No.Description Date Page 176 of 492 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 3 121' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 8" LEVEL 5 149' - 8" LEVEL 6 163' - 8" PENTHOUSE SCREEN 193' - 8" LEVEL -1 89' - 6" LEVEL -2 80' - 2" ABCD F G H ROOF 177' - 8" LEVEL 2 110' - 8" 922.00' TERRACE ROOF AMENITY ROOF ACCESS/ MECHANICAL SCREENING TO FIRE APPARATUS SETUP74' - 2"16' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 6"9' - 4"93' - 8"56' - 0"21' - 8"19' - 10"932.50' OFFICE / RETAILLOBBY EGRESS STAIR EXTENSION PARKING PARKING ELEVATOR PIT PLENUM PLENUM OFFICE E LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 3 121' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 8" LEVEL 5 149' - 8" LEVEL 6 163' - 8" PENTHOUSE SCREEN 193' - 8" LEVEL -1 89' - 6" LEVEL -2 80' - 2" 1234 7 856 ROOF 177' - 8" 9 LEVEL 2 110' - 8" OFFICE PLENUM PLENUM ARCADE RAMP RAMP RAMP PARKING LOBBY ARCADIA 932.50'16' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 6"9' - 4"ROOF ACCESS/ MECHANICAL SCREENING PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:44 AMA0-3SITE SECTION DIAGRAMS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 3/32" = 1'-0"A0-3 1BUILDING HEIGHT STUDY N/S 3/32" = 1'-0"A0-3 2BUILDING HEIGHT STUDY E/W No.Description Date Page 177 of 492 PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:46 AMA0-4EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 SOUTH-WEST CORNER PERSPECTIVE SOUTH-EAST CORNER PERSPECTIVE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE STREET LEVELNORTH-EAST CORNER PERSPECTIVE No.Description Date Page 178 of 492 PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:47 AMA0-5EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 VIEW FROM HIGHWAY 100 - HEADING NORTHVIEW FROM HIGHWAY 100 - HEADING SOUTH WEST PERSPECTIVE WEST PERSPECTIVE STREET LEVEL - LOOKING SOUTH No.Description Date Page 179 of 492 123478 A B C D 56 F G H 9 42,699 SF PARKING FRESH AIR INTAKE (FROM ABOVE)45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"48' - 0"26' - 0"17' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" E UP TO LEVEL P1 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 F G H 9 45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"48' - 0"26' - 0"17' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" 42,753 SF PARKING FRESH AIR INTAKE (SIDE WALL) 26' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0" E DOWN TO LEVEL P2 UP TO LEVEL P1 24' - 0"24' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:48 AMA1-1 FLOOR PLANS - LEVELS P1-P2 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-1 1PARKING LEVEL P2 (1/16") 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-1 2PARKING LEVEL P1 (1/16") No.Description Date Page 180 of 492 Pen CTB file location = T:\DF Construction Documents\CAD CTB Files\DFA-STD_FULLSIZE_2018_v2Pen CTB file location = T:\DF Construction Documents\CAD CTB Files\DFA-STD_FULLSIZE_2018_v2 5,864 SF OFFICE / COMMERCIAL DROP-OFF ARCADIA AVEEDEN AVENUE1,479 SF TRASH / SERVICE 24,207 SF PARKING TERRACE 4,200 SF LOBBYBREEZEWAY UP TO LEVEL 2 DOWN TO LEVEL P1 1 A6.2 EXIST HYDRANT 232 SF FIRE PUMP 395 SF ELEC 137' - 0"15' - 9"198' - 10" 214' - 7"15' - 2"46' - 10"167' - 0"229' - 0"568 SF BIKE 268 SF SERVICE 308 SF TRASH 116 SF SERVICE ROOF ABOVE EDGE OF BUILDING ABOVE VESTIBULE VESTIBULE GENERATOR TRANS MONUMENT SIGN LOADING BERTHS FDC CONNECTION HWY 100 FRONTAGE ROAD 94' - 11" 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 F G H 9 23,927 SF PARKING OPEN TO ABOVE DOWN TO LEVEL 1 E 25' - 0"24' - 0"26' - 0"24' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:49 AMA1-2FLOOR PLANS - LEVELS 1-2 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-2 1LEVEL 1 (1/16") 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-2 2 LEVEL 2 (1/16") No.Description Date Page 181 of 492 123478 A B C D 56 F G H 9 12,830 SF OFFICE ROOF 2,936 SF TERRACESTAIR TRANSFEROPEN TO BELOW 6,612 SF OFFICE 3,313 SF AMENITY45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"48' - 0"26' - 0"17' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" WC WC IDF ELEC 3,523 SF SERVICE E 1 A6.2 285 SF BALCONY 1,454 SF TERRACE 1 2 3 4 7 8 A B C D 5 6 9 24,035 SF OFFICE 631 SF SERVICE 552 SF SERVICE1' - 10"45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"1' - 10"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0" IDF ELEC WC WC 921 SF SERVICE 285 SF BALCONY PLAN NORTH PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:50 AMA1-3FLOOR PLANS - LEVELS 3-6 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-3 1LEVEL 3 (1/16") 1/16" = 1'-0"A1-3 2 LEVEL 4-6 No.Description Date Page 182 of 492 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 3 121' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 8" LEVEL 5 149' - 8" LEVEL 6 163' - 8" PENTHOUSE SCREEN 193' - 8" 12347856 ROOF 177' - 8" 9 LEVEL 2 110' - 8" 30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"10' - 8"11' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"16' - 0"STAIR CORE BEYOND SCR-1 VERTICAL FINS, EVERY OTHER MULLION MTL-1 GL-2 EXPOSED CONCRETE COLUMNS AC-1 MTL-1 EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNAGE MONUMENT SIGNAGE OPEN TO BEYONDOPEN TO BEYONDOPEN TO BEYONDOPEN TO BEYOND LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 3 121' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 8" LEVEL 5 149' - 8" LEVEL 6 163' - 8" PENTHOUSE SCREEN 193' - 8" ABCDFGH ROOF 177' - 8" LEVEL 2 110' - 8" E 30' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 8"17' - 0"26' - 0"20' - 0"28' - 0"45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0" OPEN TO BEYOND STAIR CORE BEYOND RL-1MTL-2GL-1MTL-3 RL-1 MTL-1 MUL-1 SCR-1 OUTDOOR TERRACE AC-1 VERTICAL SHADING FINS, EVERY OTHER MULLION GL-2 EXPOSED CONCRETE COLUMNS AC-1 OPEN TO BEYOND OPEN TO BEYOND OPEN TO BEYOND PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:51 AMA2-1ELEVATIONS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"A2-1 3NORTH ELEVATION LUA 1/8" = 1'-0"A2-1 4EAST ELEVATION LUA MTL-1 (METAL PANEL INTEGRATED INTO CURTAIN WALL) MTL-2 (METAL PANEL) MTL-3 (METAL PANEL) GL-1 & GL-2 (CURTAIN WALL INSULATED GLASS UNITS) RL-1 (RAILING) AC-1 (ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST) SCR-1 (MECH SCREEN) MUL-1 (FRAMES AND MULLIONS) MATERIAL LEGEND No.Description Date Page 183 of 492 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 3 121' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 8" LEVEL 5 149' - 8" LEVEL 6 163' - 8" PENTHOUSE SCREEN 193' - 8" 1234 7 856 ROOF 177' - 8" 9 LEVEL 2 110' - 8"16' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 8"30' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0" SCR-1 MUL-1MTL-1 GL-2 TENANT BALCONIES RL-1 MTL-2 MTL-3 GL-1 EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNAGE AC-1 AC-1 VERTICAL FINS, EVERY OTHER MULLION PARKING ENTRY/EXIT OPEN TO BEYOND EXPOSED CONCRETE COLUMNS EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNAGE OUTDOOR TERRACE OUTDOOR TERRACE MONUMENT SIGNAGE OPEN TO BEYOND OPEN TO BEYONDOPEN TO BEYOND OPEN TO BEYOND LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 3 121' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 8" LEVEL 5 149' - 8" LEVEL 6 163' - 8" PENTHOUSE SCREEN 193' - 8" ABC D F G H ROOF 177' - 8" LEVEL 2 110' - 8" E 16' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"11' - 0"10' - 8"45' - 0"30' - 0"45' - 0"28' - 0"20' - 0"26' - 0"17' - 0" SCR-1 MTL-3 AC-1 GL-2 GL-1RL-1 MUL-1 MUL-1 MTL-2 MTL-1 MTL-1 MTL-3 EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNAGE STAIR CORE BEYOND VERTICAL SHADING FINS, EVERY OTHER MULLION TENANT BALCONIES PARKING ENTRY/EXIT OPEN TO BEYOND OUTDOOR TERRACE OUTDOOR TERRACE EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNAGE MONUMENT SIGNAGE PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:53 AMA2-2ELEVATIONS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 1/8" = 1'-0"A2-2 1SOUTH ELEVATION LUA 1/8" = 1'-0"A2-2 2WEST ELEVATION LUA No.Description Date MTL-1 (METAL PANEL INTEGRATED INTO CURTAIN WALL) MTL-2 (METAL PANEL) MTL-3 (METAL PANEL) GL-1 & GL-2 (CURTAIN WALL INSULATED GLASS UNITS) RL-1 (RAILING) AC-1 (ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST) SCR-1 (MECH SCREEN) MUL-1 (FRAMES AND MULLIONS) MATERIAL LEGEND Page 184 of 492 PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOTES BETWEEN QA AND PROJECT TEAM 2/24/2025 11:39:53 AMA2-3EXTERIOR MATERIALS 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 AC-1 (ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST)SCR-1 (MECH SCREEN) MTL-3 (METAL PANEL)MTL-1 (ACM INTEGRATED INTO CURTAIN WALL)GL-1 & GL-2 (CURTAIN WALL INSULATED GLASS UNITS) PODIUM - MOST CLEARBUILDING - HIGHER PERFORMING MTL-2 (METAL PANEL) GL-1GL-2 MUL-1 (FRAMES AND MULLIONS) No.Description Date Page 185 of 492 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC0.0TITLE SHEETARCADIA5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MINNESOTASITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNISSUED FOR: LUA SUBMITTALKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COSTTO THE OWNER.SHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETC1.0REMOVALS PLANC2.0SITE PLANC3.0GRADING PLANC4.0UTILITY PLANC5.0CIVIL DETAILSC5.1CIVIL DETAILSC5.2CIVIL DETAILSSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS & NARRATIVESW1.3SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSPROJECT CONTACTSNAME & ADDRESSCONTACTCIVIL ENGINEERCIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422MATT PAVEK612-615-0060 EXT. 701MPAVEK@CIVILSITEGROUP.COMLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTDAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS310 SOUTH 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 7050,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415JESSE SYMYNKYWICZ763-257-7928JSYMYNKYWICZ@DAMONFARBER.COMDEVELOPER /CONTRACTOROPUS DESIGN BUILD (ODB)10350 BREN ROAD WESTMINNETONKA, MN 55343GEORGE PARRINO952-656-4738GEORGE.PARRINO@OPUS-GROUP.COMPROPERTY OWNERARCHITECTESG ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN350 NORTH 5TH STREET, SUITE 400,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CHRISTOPHER WILLETTE612-373-4680CHRISTOPHER.WILLETTE@ESGARCH.COMSURVEYORSUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 E BLOOMINGTON FWY (35W) SUITE 118,BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420ARLEE CARLSON952-881-2455ARLEE.CARLSON@SUNDE.COMGEOTECHNICALENGINEERBRAUN INTERTEC11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55348AARON SCHULZETENBERG701-516-4337ASCHULZETENBERG@BRAUNINTERTEC.COMREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPALIA LLC C/O NANCY GRASSINI-OLSON1600 W 82ND ST #100,BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431JOHN WILLIAMS952-656-4578JOHN.WILLIAMS@OPUS-GROUP.COM1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FORTHE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BYCODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMEDPRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINALCONNECTION OF SERVICES.3.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK,FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE INPROJECT DOCUMENTS.4.CIVIL SITE GROUP SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FOR ANYCOSTS ARISING OUT OF THE CLIENTS DECISION TO OBTAIN BIDS ORPROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION BEFORE CIVIL SITE GROUP HAS ISSUEDFINAL, FULLY-APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CLIENTACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL PRELIMINARY PLANS ARE SUBJECT TOSUBSTANTIAL REVISION UNTIL PLANS ARE FULLY APPROVED AND ALLPERMITS ARE OBTAINED.Page 186 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSFOR ALL FENCE REMOVALS ORPRESERVATIONS ON LOT LINES:CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRMOWNERSHIP OF FENCE PRIOR TOREMOVAL AND COORDINATE WITHADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.REMOVE ALL EXISTING PRIVATEUTILITY SERVICES (THAT ARE NOTTO BE REUSED) PER PRIVATEUTILITY COMPANY AND CITYSTANDARDSCONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT &REMOVE PUBLIC PVMTS., CURBS,AND WALKS FOR INSTALLATIONOF UTILITIES. UPON COMPLETIONOF UTILITY WORK, REPLACE ALLMATERIAL, IN KIND, AND TO CITYSTANDARD AND APPROVALREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSROAD BEGINS TO TRANSITION TO BRIDGEDESIGN/STRUCTURE. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.EXPANSION JOINT OF BRIDGEPROTECT FROM DAMAGE.EXISTING PED RAMP TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEREMOVE EXISTINGTREE AND ROOTBALL, TYP.ADJACENT FENCE ANDFOOTINGS TO REMAIN.PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING "STOP" SIGN. SEE SITEPLAN FOR PROPOSED LOCATION. COORD. W/ CITY.REMOVE EXISTING WATER SERVICE,REMOVE BACK TO THE MAIN PER CITYSTANDARDS, LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE,CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFYREMOVE EXISTING GATE VALVE & ASSOCIATED WATER SERVICE, REMOVE BACK TO THE MAIN PER CITYSTANDARDS, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY WATER SERVICE LOCATION (FIELD VERIFY)ADJACENT FENCE ANDFOOTINGS TO REMAIN.PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND ROOT BALL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY CLEANOUT & ASSOCIATED SANITARY SERVICE (6'' VCP)(PER RECORD) (APPROX.107 LF) PER CITY STANDARDS, LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY. REMOVE TO BENDIN SERVICE (APPROX. 18' PAST THE PROPERTY LINE & 26' PAST THE PROPOSED BUILDING.)REMOVE EXISTING GAS LINE PER CITYSTANDARDS, COORD. W/ UTILITY CO.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUNDCONDUIT PER CITY STANDARDS,COORD. W/ UTILITY CO.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UTILITIESPER CITY STANDARDS, COORD. W/ UTILITY CO.REMOVE EXISTING TRANSFORMERPER CITY STANDARDS, COORD. W/UTILITY CO.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CONDUIT &EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX / PEDESTAL PERCITY STANDARDS, COORD. W/ UTILITY CO.ADJACENT FENCE ANDFOOTINGS TO REMAIN.PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING MONUMENTSIGN & BASE MATERIALREMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPINGMATERIAL, SHRUBS & TREES,. TYP.REMOVE EXISTING BIG BLOCK RETAININGWALL, FENCE ATOP WALL, BASE MATERIAL,& ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE BEHIND WALLSALVAGE EXISTING BIG BLOCK RETAINING WALL, FENCE ATOP WALL,BASE MATERIAL, & ANY EXISTING DRAIN TILE BEHIND WALLSALVAGE & RELOCATE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE. COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN & 12'' RCP STORMPIPE. SEE UTILITY PLAN. REMOVE RETAINING WALLDRAIN TILE & DRAIN TILE CONNECTION INTOEXISTING CATCH BASIN(PER RECORD)(FIELD VERIFY)REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN & 12'' RCPSTORM PIPE. RECONSTRUCT DOWNSTREAMCATCH BASIN AS NECESSARY. SEE UTILITY PLANREMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN & 12'' PEP STORM PIPE.RECONSTRUCT DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASIN AS NECESSARY.SEE UTILITY PLAN.REMOVE RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE & DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONINTO EXISTING CATCH BASIN(PER RECORD)(FIELD VERIFY)REMOVE EXISTING C&G,& BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING C&G,& BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING C&G,& BASE MATERIAL TYP.EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.REMOVE EXISTING CONC. DRIVEENTRANCE & BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CONC. WALK,SECTION OF BIT. TO THE EAST &BASE MATERIAL TYP.EXISTING SIDEWALK & PED RAMP TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGEREMOVE EXISTING C&G,& BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING C&G, & BASE MATERIALTYP. EXISTING DRAIN TILE TO REMAIN(PERRECORD) PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.REMOVE / REPLACE EXISTING CATCH BASIN RIM. SEE UTILITY PLAN. EXISTINGDRAIN TILE BEHIND C&G CONNECTS INTO THIS CATCH BASIN PER CITY AS-BUILT(PER RECORD) EXISTING DRAINTILE TO REMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING C&G, & BASEMATERIAL TYP.REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING STOP SIGN & "DO NOTENTER" SIGN FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER SERVICE.REPLACE AFTER INSTALLATION. COORD. W/ CITY.SALVAGE & RELOCATE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE. COORD. W/ CITYSALVAGE & RELOCATE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE. COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTING FENCEAND FOOTING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CONC.WALK & BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CONC. DRIVEENTRANCE & BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPINGMATERIAL, SHRUBS & TREES,. TYP.REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTING NO PARKINGSIGN (FIELD VERIFY). SEE SITE PLAN FORPROPOSED LOCATION. COORD. W/ CITY.EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX TO REMAIN.PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,. TYP.EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN TOREMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,. TYP.EXISTING "ARCADIA AVE" SIGN TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,. TYP.EXISTING "YIELD" SIGN TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,. TYP.EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN TOREMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,. TYP.EXISTING "SOUTH 100" SIGN TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE,. TYP. (FIELD VERIFY)REMOVE EXISTING CONC. WALK, SECTION OFBIT. TO THE NORTH & BASE MATERIAL TYP.REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPINGMATERIAL, SHRUBS & TREES,. TYP.REMOVE/SALVAGE EXISTINGROUNDABOUT SIGN. SEE SITE PLAN FORPROPOSED LOCATION. COORD. W/ CITY.REMOVE EXISTING CONC.WALK & BASE MATERIAL TYP.EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGELUMEN DUCT RUNS UNDER EXISTING BOULEVARD & EXISTINGSIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EDEN AVE(PER RECORD).CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE FOR LOCATE ANDREFERENCE AS-BUILT INFORMATION. FIELD VERIFY.XCEL DUCT (6'' PVC) RUNS UNDER EXISTING BOULEVARD& EXISTING SIDEWALK (APPROX. 2' BELOW C&GELEVATION) (PER RECORD) ON THE NORTH SIDE OFEDEN AVE. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE FOR LOCATEAND REFERENCE AS-BUILT INFORMATION. FIELD VERIFY.REMOVE EXISTING 4'' WATER SERVICE (PERRECORD) BACK TO THE GV & BOX. ABANDONIN PLACE PER CITY STANDARDS. LOCATIONIS APPROX. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFYEXISTING C&G DRAIN TILE CONNECTS INTO THIS CBMH (PER RECORD).EXISTING DRAINTILE TO REMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGEEXISTING C&G DRAIN TILE CONNECTS INTO THISCBMH (PER RECORD). EXISTING DRAIN TILE TOREMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.EXISTING C&G DRAIN TILE CONNECTS INTO THISCBMH (PER RECORD). EXISTING DRAIN TILE TOREMAIN. PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.SALVAGE & RELOCATE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE. COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTING CONC. WALK& BASE MATERIAL TYP.SALVAGE & RELOCATE (GRADEADJUSTMENT) EXISTING LIGHT POLE.COORD. W/ CITY/OWNERWATER CONNECTION SEEUTILITY PLANWATER CONNECTION SEEUTILITY PLANNON-ACCESS LINE PERSURVEYREMOVALS PLAN LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASEMATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., ANDGRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTUREINCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS ANDFOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDINGROOTS AND STUMPSCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC1.0REMOVALS PLANREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF INRIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCALGOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:CITY OF EDINA REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENTCONNECTIONS.6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCALREGULATIONS.7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITHPROPOSED PLANS.8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHINTHE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTIONSHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITYREQUIREMENTS. FOR ANY WORK ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THEADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK.11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORKHOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. ATNO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVALBY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORMTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS,AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN AMANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TOLGU.19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPROPERTY LINEREMOVAL OF TREES ANDVEGETATION INCLUDING STUMPSAND ROOT SYSTEMS01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallROWNER INFORMATIONPALIA LLC C/O NANCY GRASSINI-OLSON1600 W 82ND ST #100,BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431JOHN WILLIAMS952-656-4578JOHN.WILLIAMS@OPUS-GROUP.COMTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'DLDRIPLINE WIDTHFURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ONPLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIP LINE. PLACE TREEPROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA.POSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1Page 187 of 492 5,864 SFOFFICE / COMMERCIALDROP-OFF1,479 SFTRASH / SERVICE24,207 SFPARKINGTERRACE4,200 SFLOBBYUP TOLEVEL1.5DOWN TOLEVEL P1SERVICEENTRANCE232 SFFIRE PUMP395 SFELECGARAGEEXHAUST568 SFBIKE308 SFTRASH8.06.0CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS21.322.84.011.7526.0 2.04.56.06.08.06.021.10.43.33.316.7534.526.02.04.66.08.05.68.95.06.06.08.06.08.08.09.85.0GENERATOR. SEEELECTRICAL PLANSUTILITY/TRANSFORMERPADS, COORD. W/MECH'L AND UTILITY CO.CONC. WALK, TYPPED RAMP, TYPGREEN SPACEGARAGE AIREXHAUSTR5.08' WIDE CONC. WALK,PER CITY STANDARDS6' WIDE BOULEVARDLANDSCAPE PROGRAMMING AREA.SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSLOWER LEVELBUILDING WALL LEVEL 1 AND ABOVEBUILDING WALLMAIN ENTRANCE / PATIO / PLAZA.PED RAMP, TYPRAISED PRIVATE PATIO/ TERRACE AREAAIR INTAKE FORGARAGE LEVEL8' WIDE CONC. WALK,PER CITY STANDARDS6' WIDE BOULEVARDLOWER LEVELBUILDING WALLLOWER LEVELBUILDING WALLCIP RET. WALL EXTENDSABOVE GRADE. SEEARCH'L PLANSR5.0R5.0 R5.0CONCRETE COMMERCIALDRIVE ENTRANCE PERCITY STANDARDSCONCRETE COMMERCIALDRIVE ENTRANCE PERCITY STANDARDSPED RAMP, TYPVALLEY GUTTER,SEE CITY DETAILMATCH INTO EXISTINGPED RAMP.MATCH INTO EXISTINGCONC. WALK.PROPOSEDBUILDINGENHANCED LANDSCAPEFEATURES, SEELANDSCAPE PLANCAST-IN-PLACE CONC. RETAININGWALL,. TYP. SEE GRADING PLAN FORELEVATIONS AGAINST WALL. SHOPDRAWINGS REQ'DR15.0RISERS UP TO FRONTENTRANCE. SEE GRADINGPLAN FOR ELEVATIONSPED RAMP,.TYP.INSTALL NEW DRAIN TILE BENEATH ALL PROPOSED/ IMPACTED C&G ALONG EDEN AVE & ARCADIA AVE& CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAIN TILE BENEATHEXISTING C&G. SEE CITY DETAIL,. TYP.LEVEL 1 & ABOVEBUILDING WALLBENCH TOPS ON CONC. SEATSTAIRS. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSR68.5R21.5 R68.5R17.5R20.0PRE-CAST CONC. WALL DOWN TOGRADE. SEE GRADING PLAN FORELEVATIONS AGAINST WALLR78.0MATCH INTO EXISTINGPED RAMP.MATCH EXISTING C&G PERCITY STANDARDS., TYP.MATCH EXISTING C&G PERCITY STANDARDS., TYP.CIP RET. WALL EXTENDSABOVE GRADE. SEEARCH'L PLANS2' CONC BUFFER /ROCK MULCH AREAR10.0PROPERTY LINEMATCH / COORD.W/ ARCH. PARKINGDECK PLANPROPERTY LINEB618 C&G SEE CITY DETAILB618 C&G SEE CITY DETAILB612 C&G,TYP.GRADE ADJUSTMENT WITHINMNDOT ROW WILL REQUIRE MNDOTPERMIT. SEE GRADING PLANPROPERTY LINEEXISTING MNDOT FENCER20.0MONUMENT SIGN, FINAL SIZE, FOOTING,& LOCATION TO BE SPECIFIED. COORD.W/ ARCH'L PLANSTRENCH DRAIN SEEUTILITY PLANMONUMENT SIGN, FINAL SIZE, FOOTING,& LOCATION TO BE SPECIFIED. COORD.W/ ARCH'L PLANSCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENTMARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGSREQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IFAPPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTFOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSEDEPTH, SEE DETAIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IFAPPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTFOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSEDEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOSPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) -PROVIDE BID FOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS,INCLUDE VARIATIONS OF BASE MATERIAL ANDOTHER NECESSARY COMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.CITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC SITE NOTES.ACCESSIBILITY ROUTE ARROW (IFAPPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENTOF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THELAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FORAPPROVAL.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENINGPERMIT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITEIMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BESTAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDINGIS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THEFOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES.THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A.REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTHOF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIREDBY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPEDOCUMENTS.19.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALL ANY SIDEWALK AND CURBING PER DESIGN PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CURBS ANDSIDEWALKS WILL DRAIN PROPERLY IN FIELD CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER 24-HOURS PRIOR TO ANYCURB AND/OR SIDEWALK INSTALLATION TO REVIEW AND INSPECT CURB STAKES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB ORSIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IF THIS PROCEDURE IS NOT FOLLOWED.20.FINISH GRADING FOR HARDSCAPE AREAS IE. PARKING LOTS, CURBS, SIDEWALKS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.05 FEET. ADA AREAS MUST COMPLYWITH REQUIREMENTS ON PLANS AND ADA REGULATIONS. TOLERANCE WITHIN ADA AREAS IS 0.00 FEET DISCUSS ANY DEVIATIONS WITHENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB, SIDEWALK AND/OR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT THATDOES NOT MEET TOLERANCE/ADA REQUIREMENTS.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATEBASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, WITHIN ROWSEE CITY DETAIL, WITHIN PRIVATEPROPERTY SEE CSG DETAILOPERATIONAL NOTESSNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDEPARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO. SHALLREMOVE EXCESS OFF-SITE.TRASH REMOVALTRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN EXTERIOR TRASHAREA AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO.WEEKLY.DELIVERIESDELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE SERVICE AREAOFF EDEN AVE ENTRANCE VIA STANDARDCOMMERCIAL DELIVERY VEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX,USPS).REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallROWNER INFORMATIONPALIA LLC C/O NANCY GRASSINI-OLSON1600 W 82ND ST #100,BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431JOHN WILLIAMS952-656-4578JOHN.WILLIAMS@OPUS-GROUP.COMPage 188 of 492 5,864 SFOFFICE / COMMERCIALDROP-OFF1,479 SFTRASH / SERVICE24,207 SFPARKINGTERRACE4,200 SFLOBBYUP TOLEVEL1.5DOWN TOLEVEL P1SERVICEENTRANCE232 SFFIRE PUMP395 SFELECGARAGEEXHAUST568 SFBIKE308 SFTRASHCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSST-1ST-2ST-12ST-3ST-11ST-4ST-5ST-6ST-10ST-7ST-8ST-9COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC3.0GRADING PLANGENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OFSTAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSCITY OF EDINA GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOW41.261125891.00 G891.00 TC891.00 BS/TS1137EOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING891.00 MEGBGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS, (FFE, LFE, GFE), PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BY CROSS CHECKING WITHARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ELEVATIONS FOR EQUIVALENT "100" ELEVATIONS. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION ANDINSTALLATION OF ANY FOOTING MATERIALS. VERIFICATION OF THIS COORDINATION SHALL BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING BY CIVIL, SURVEYOR,ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.3.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOILCORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOILTESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALLREQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.5.ANY ELEMENTS OF AN EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM AND RELATED EXCAVATIONS THAT FALL WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WILL REQUIRE A“RIGHT OF WAY EXCAVATION PERMIT”. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AQUIRING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IF APPLICABLE6.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATIONSYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.7.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.9.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1.10.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED ANDENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TOESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLETO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.12.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO ANAREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.13.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED INEMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERETURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUMDEPTH OF 6 INCHES.14.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDINGADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPESBETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISHGRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVEBECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THECONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEWWORK.15.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THEDIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALLDETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANYUNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.16.AN OSHA-APPROVED QUALIFIED PERSON SHOULD REVIEW THE SOIL CLASSIFICATION PRESENTED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IN THE FIELD.EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH CURRENT OSHA REQUIREMENTS IN THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO EXCAVATIONSAND TRENCHES. EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 17.TOLERANCES17.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THEPRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.17.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.17.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESSDIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.17.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.17.5.FINISH GRADING FOR HARDSCAPE AREAS IE. PARKING LOTS, CURBS, SIDEWALKS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.05 FEET. ADA AREAS MUST COMPLYWITH REQUIREMENTS ON PLANS AND ADA REGULATIONS. TOLERANCE WITHIN ADA AREAS IS 0.00 FEET DISCUSS ANY DEVIATIONS WITHENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB, SIDEWALK AND/OR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT THATDOES NOT MEET TOLERANCE/ADA REQUIREMENTS.18.MAINTENANCE18.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.18.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURINGTHE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BERESEEDED AND MULCHED.18.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER,CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRGROUNDWATER ELEVATION PERBORINGBORINGGROUND WATERELEVATIONST-1NEST-2NEST-3NEST-4NEST-5NEST-6NEST-7NEST-8NEST-9NEST-10NEST-11NEST-12NEPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMPLETED BY BRAUNINTERTEC, INC. ON 01/14/2025SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OFRETAINING WALL / TOP OF RETAINING WALL891.00 BW/TWSPOT GRADE ELEVATION RIM ELEVATION891.00 REPage 189 of 492 5,864 SFOFFICE / COMMERCIALDROP-OFF1,479 SFTRASH / SERVICE24,207 SFPARKINGTERRACE4,200 SFLOBBYUP TOLEVEL1.5DOWN TOLEVEL P1SERVICEENTRANCE232 SFFIRE PUMP395 SFELECGARAGEEXHAUST568 SFBIKE308 SFTRASHCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSUNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN 1P180.67 LF (2 ROWS @ 80 LF & TWO HEADERS @10.33 LF) 42'' PERF. CMP12'' SIDE & END STONE, 16'' STONE SEPARATION,6'' STONE COVER & 6'' STONE BASESYSTEM FOOTPRINT = 89' X 10.33'IE STONE=921.50IE PIPE=922.00OE 15" ORIFICE=924.80TOP OF 42'' PIPE=925.50TOP STONE=926.00BAFFLE ELEV=923.75TOTAL SYSTEM CAPACITY=2,675 CFEOF OF SYSTEM = EXIST CB RE=928.310.01.0UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN 2P45" CHAMBER HEIGHT ADS STORMTECHMC-3500 ARCH SYSTEM18 CHAMBERS12'' SIDE & END STONE, 9'' STONE SEPARATION,12'' STONE COVER & 9'' STONE BASESYSTEM FOOTPRINT=91.74' X 8.42'-15.59' WIDTHIE STONE=923.50IE ARCH PIPE=924.25OE 12" ORIFICE=927.35TOP OF PIPE=928.00TOP STONE =929.00TOTAL SYSTEM CAPACITY=3,631 CFEOF OF SYSTEM = EXIST CB RE=928.710.010.08'' CIP WATER MAIN PER CITY (PERRECORD). CONFLICTS WITH SURVEYDATA (FIELD VERIFY)8'' DIP WATER MAIN PER CITY (PERRECORD). CONFLICTS WITHSURVEY DATA (FIELD VERIFY)MAKE WET TAP CONNECTIONTO EXISTING 8'' CIP WATERMAIN (PER RECORD)(FIELDVERIFY SIZE & MATERIALTWO 45° BENDSGV & VALVE BOX8'' COMBINED DIP WATER SERVICE& FIRE SERVICE, STUB TO W/I 5'FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'L PLANS.GV & VALVE BOXFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION.COORD. W/ MECH'L20 LF 6" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE @ 2.00%EXISTING 6'' SANITARYSERVICE (PER CITY)(FIELD VERIFY)SANMH 1 - 48'' STRUCTURERE=928.24EXIST 6'' IE (S) ≈ 917.1(FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION)PROP 6'' IE (NW) = 917.60COORD. W/ CITYSTUB SANITARY TO 5' FROMBUILDING IE @ STUB=918.00COORD. W/ MECH'L PLANSSTUB STORM TO 5' FROMBUILDING IE @ STUB=928.50COORD. W/ MECH'L PLANS9 LF 12'' SCH. 40 PVCSTORM @ 2.00%OUTLET IE=926.25INLET IE=926.13REPLACE RIM W/ TYPE "BB"CASTING. SEE CITY DETAIL.UTILITY CROSSINGLUMEN DUCTSTUB STORM TO 5' FROMBUILDING IE @ STUB=924.62COORD. W/ MECH'L PLANS6 LF 12'' SCH. 40 PVCSTORM @ 2.00%INLET IE=924.50EOF=928.7OUTLET IE=923.75EOF=928.3HYD. & GV PERCITY STANDARDS22 LF TRENCH DRAINRIM=932.35BOT=930.35IE=924.62SEE DETAIL6 LF 12" SCH. 40 PVCSTORM @ 2.00%DIRECT APPROX. 12,700 SF (≈ 40%)OF UPPER ROOF STORM WATERRUNOFF TO EAST TO BASIN 2PDIRECT APPROX. 16,700 SF (≈60%)OF UPPER ROOF STORM WATERRUNOFF TO WEST TO BASIN 1P8''X6'' TEEINLET IE=924.505 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 2.00%OCS 1-48"RIM=929.20IE(E)=923.65IE(W)=924.805 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 2.00%MAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTINGCATCH BASIN W/ 15'' RCPEXISTING RE=928.3EXISTING IE (W)=924.6PROP IE (E)=924.70RESHAPE BENCH. COORD. W/ CITYCBMH 1RIM=932.17IE(N)=926.25IE(W)=928.32IE(S)=926.25SUMP=922.25INSTALL SAFL BAFFLE6 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%CBMH 3RIM=931.25IE=927.2525 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%CBMH 2RIM=932.14IE=927.0025 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%25 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 2.00%OCS 2-48"RIM=932.55IE(N)=925.75IE(SW)=927.3562 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 3.47%MAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTINGCATCH BASIN W/ 15'' RCPEXISTING RE=928.7EXISTING IE (SW)=925.1PROP IE (NE)=925.20RESHAPE BENCH COORD. W/ CITYCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY PLAN LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.CATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPCONSTRUCTION LIMITSDRAINTILETRENCH DRAINREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.4.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.5.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.6.UTILITIES CONNECTIONS ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELYRESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.7.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.8.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.10.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.11.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.12.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.13.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.14.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.15.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.16.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALLBE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BELIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALLTIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.17.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALLOWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFICLOADING.18.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.19.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.20.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPONCOMPLETION OF WORK.21.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION.SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ANDREQUIREMENTS.22.AN OSHA-APPROVED QUALIFIED PERSON SHOULD REVIEW THE SOIL CLASSIFICATION PRESENTED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IN THEFIELD. EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH CURRENT OSHA REQUIREMENTS IN THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TOEXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES. EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. Page 190 of 492 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.0CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONHEIGHT VARIES, SEE GRADING PLANRETAINING WALLN T SFENCE OR RAILING - INSTALL PER PERMANUF. SPECS. SHOP DRAWINGSREQUIREDTOPSOIL &PLANTINGS, SEEPLAN FORSPECIFIC FINISHEDCONDITIONMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALL UNITSAS SPECIFIED (TYP.)GEOGRID REINFORCEMENTAS SPECIFIED-VERIFY LENGTH WITHENGINEER12" WIDE DRAINAGE LAYER95% COMPACTED BACKFILLSOIL IN 6" LIFTS4" DIA. PERF. DRAINTILE W/ SOCK6" MIN. COMPACTEDLEVELING PADIN SITU & COMPACTED SUBGRADELIMIT OF EXCAVATIONNOTES:1.THESE SECTIONS ARE FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSESONLY. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT TO LANDSCAPEARCHITECT CERTIFIED DRAWING BY A MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ON STAFF WITH RETAININGWALL MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO WALL INSTALLATION.PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION TO BE PAID FORBY THE CONTRACTOR. SECTION AND ELEVATION OFEACH WALL REQUIRED.2.ALL SOIL PARAMETERS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY AGEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OR SITE ENGINEERPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF ACTUAL SITECONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE ASSUMED, NOTIFYMANUFACTURER OF C.M.U. RETAINING WALL 72HOURS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.3.RAILING IS REQUIRED ON RETAINING WALLS INLOCATIONS WHERE DIFFERENCES IN GRADE ONEITHER SIDE OF THE WALL ARE IN EXCESS OF 2.5' ANDARE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 4' TO A WALK, PATH,PARKING AREA, OR DRIVE ACCESS ON THE HIGHSIDE-SEE PLANS.4.COORDINATE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OFRAILING POSTS AND FOOTINGS DURING THEINSTALLATION OF WALL MATERIALS.5.COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF RAIL POSTS ANDFOOTINGS WITH INSTALLATION AND LOCATION OFGEOGRID REINFORCEMENT. AT NO POINTTHROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACTSHALL CONTRACTOR ALTER THE INTEGRITY OF THEGEOGRID OR WALL MATERIALS.6.AIR DRIVE RAILING FOOTINGS AS SPECIFIED AND IN AMANNER TO NOT DISTURB THE WALL GEOGRID ASRECOMMENDED BY THE WALL MANUFACTURER.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OFRAILING FOOTING WITH WALL MANUFACTURER TOOBSERVE INSTALLATION OF RAILING FOOTINGS.CAP BLOCKIN SITUSUBGRADE.APPROX. 4', SEE MANUF.SPECS. & SHOP DWG.RETAINING WALL SYSTEM, INSTALL PER MANUF. SPECS./INSTRUCT. ADJ. PVMT./FINISH SEE PLANS AND DETAILS "SLEEVE-IT" POST ANCHOR SYSTEM,INSTALL PER MANUF. COORD. W/RETAINING WALL CONTRACTOR.7EXTERIOR SITE STAIR & HANDRAILN T SNOTES:1. SOIL TESTING, COMPACTION, AND BACKFILLING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE GEO-TECHNICALRECOMMENDATIONS OR AS SPECIFIED.2. SUBMIT RAILING SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION. COORDINATEFABRICATION OF RAILING WITH OTHER RAIL OR FENCE TYPES. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH CURRENTADA ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.3. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF RETAINING WALL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF STAIRS-SEE RETAINING WALL DETAIL.4. NO SPACE SHALL BE ALLOWED BETWEEN STAIRS AND RETAINING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. CONCRETE SHALLDIRECTLY ABUT FACE OF RETAINING WALL.8"VERIFY WALK WIDTHS WITH SITE PLAN.REGARDLESS OF SITE PLAN LAYOUT,ENSURE MIN. 36" BETWEEN HANDRAILS.18" TYP.SECTION12"TYP.FINISHED GRADE12"24" TYP 12" TYP.12"TREAD6" RISER 1%12"24"VARIES, SEE PLAN4" TYP. FROM EDGE OF CHEEK WALL TO CENTER OF RAIL.PLAN12"8" SEE PLANS 12" TYP.24"36"FINISHED GRADECOMPACTED SUBGRADE12" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT.8"L #4 STEEL DOWEL WITH SLEEVE (TYP.)PAVEMENT,SEE PLANS#4 REBAR AT 12" O.C.BOTH WAYS (TYP.)CORE AND GROUT RAIL INTO PLACE,MIN. 6" DEPTH.6" DEPTH, CLASS 5AGGREGATE BASECOORD. W/ARCH'LAND OWNER ONRAILING SELECTIONEXISTINGSTOOP8" WIDE CONC. CHEEKWALL (TYP.)TOP OFCHEEK WALL#3 REBAR AT EACH NOSING12" DIA. RADIUS (TYP.)BROOM FINISH TREADS PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFICPROPOSEDGRADEBOTTOM OFCHEEK WALL TOBE 6" BELOWGRADECOORD. W/ARCH'LAND OWNER ONRAILING SELECTION9TRENCH DRAINN T SEXPANSION JOINTVARIES SEE PLAN8" 10"6"TRENCH DRAIN FRAME & COVER NEENAHR-4999-L2 OR APPROVED EQUAL HEAVY DUTYGRATED COVER. GRATE COVER TO BE TYPE"L" SEE PLAN FOR TRENCH LENGTHSLOPE BOTTOM TOOUTLET, SEE UTILITYPLAN6#6 LONG'L.#6 @ 2'-0" O.C.CONCRETE SLAB ONGRADE, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANFOR JOINTS.6"8"10"8"6"6"EXPANSION JOINT6EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT DETAILSN T SNOTES:1.SEPARATING TAPE OR BACKERMATERIAL REQUIRED TO PREVENT JOINTSEALANT FROM FLOWING INTO SAWCUT,TO SEPARATE NONCOMPATIBLEMATERIALS AND TO PREVENT SEALANTFROM BONDING TO BOTTOM OFRESERVOIR.2.TOP OF SEALANT WILL BE 1/8" TO 1/4"BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT.W= WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR1/2" MINIMUN5/8" MAXIMUMEXCEPT FOR 3/4" EXPANSIONJOINTSD= DEPTH OF SEALANT1.0 TO 1.5 TIMES WT= DEPTH OF INTIAL SAWCUT, 1/4 OFTHE SLAB THINKNESS FORPAVEMENT LESS THAN 12"POURED JOINTSEALANTSEPARATING TAPE SEENOTE 1SEE NOTE 2POURED JOINTSEALANTSEE NOTE 2BACKER MATERIAL SEENOTE 1WD TTWDPOURED JOINTSEALANTSEE NOTE 2BACKER MATERIALSEE NOTE 1T WDCOMPACTED CLASS 5AGGREGATE BASE. SEESOIL REPORT FORDEPTH, 6" MIN.EXTERIOR BUILDING WALLCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENT4BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - ALL TYPESN T S"A" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT2360 - SPWEA340B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)"B" BASE COURSE (MNDOT2360 - SPNWB330B)"C" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)COMPACTED SUBGRADE(100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAX. DRYDENSITY)PAVEMENT DESIGNTYPEWEAR (A)BASE (B)AGG.(C)NOTE:IF NO DESIGN IS DEFINED IN ABOVE CHART, SEEGEOTECH REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.IF DESIGN IS DEFINED IN ABOVE CHART, IT SHOULD BECONSIDERED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.1LIGHT DUTYX"X"X"HEAVY DUTYX"X"X"DOWELED JOINT BETWEEN TWO PAVEMENTSN T S"D" - DENOTES DOWEL DIAMETER"T" - DENOTES PAVEMENT THICKNESSNOTES:1.EITHER ONE PIECE OR THREADED SPLIT-TYPE DOWELMAY BE USED.2.USE THICKENED EDGE ON NEW PAVEMENT WHENEXISTING PAVEMENT HAS THICKENED EDGE.DRILL & GROUT DOWELEPOXY COATEDDOWEL SCHEDULEDOWEL SIZEDIA.LENGTHSPACING8" OR LESS34"16"12" 0.C.9" - 11"1"16"12" 0.C.12"-15"1-1/4"20"15" O.C.16" OR MORE1-1/2"20"18" O.C.16" OR MORE1-1/2"22"24" O.C."T""T"/2 +/- "D"/2PROPOSED NEW PVMT/CURB OF OTHER CONC STRUCTURE,SEE PLANEXISTING PVMT. OR EXISTING/PROPOSED NEW PVMT./CURBOR OTHER CONC. STRUCTURE, SEE PLAN3N T SB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER7"13 1/2"6"FINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADE3" RADIUS CORNERS1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1'0.5% SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSESLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENTSLOPES AWAY FROM CURB1/2" RADIUS6"8"12"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUB-BASE,COORD. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTDETAIL (6" MIN.)COMPACTED SUB-BASE, EXIST.NATIVE OR PER SOILS REPORTNOTE:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS1/2" RADIUS5DOWNSPOUT TO PIPE CONNECTIONN T SVARIES BUILDING DOWNSPOUT REFER TOARCH'L6" SLOTTED DRAIN CAPCOMPACTED SOIL6" PVC SEWER RISER PIPE(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)6 PVC LONG RADIUS 14 BENDSEWER ELBOW6" PVC SEWER PIPECRUSHED AND COMPACTEDSTONEFINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADE IF PVMT.2"2" AIR GAP8FINISHED GRADENOTES:1.INSTALLATION SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED.2.SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.3.IF NO DESIGN IS DEFINED IN CHART, SEE GEOTECH REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.4.IF DESIGN IS DEFINED IN CHART, IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.5.CONCRETE PADS. ON-SITE SHALL INCLUDE FIBER REINFORCING - 5 LBS./C.Y. CONC. MACRO-FIBERS PER ASTM C1116 ORSTEEL REINFORCEMENT #4 @ 16"FIBER-REINFORCED CONCRETEN T S (PRIVATE PROPERTY)SAW CUT JOINT,SEE DETAIL (TYP.)LIGHT BROOM FINISHPERPENDICULAR TOTRAFFIC"A" CONCRETE ASSPECIFIED"B" CLASS 5AGGREGATE BASECOMPACTEDSUBGRADETHIS OCCURS ONLY WHEREMULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALKLEAVE TOP OF MULCH DOWN1" FROM TOP OF WALKPAVEMENT DESIGNTYPECONC. (A)AGG.(B)CURING:1. APPLY CURING COMPOUNDS IMMEDIATELY UPON FINAL FINISHING OF CONC. SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITHMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION AND THE SPECIFICATIONS BELOW.2. ALL CONC. SURFACES SHALL HAVE CURING COMPOUNDS ALLIED PER ASTM C-1315. AT 200 S.F. PER GAL.3. ALL CURING COMPOUNDS SHALL BE TYPE 1 (CLEAR) AND CONTAIN ACRYLIC BASED CLASS B RESTRICTED RESIN SOLIDS.5 LBS. / C.Y. CONC. MACRO-FIBERREINFORCING OR STEELREINFORCEMENT #4 @ 16"JOINT DEPTH T/32TRASH PAD8"6"Page 191 of 492 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.1CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONUNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEMN T S216" MIN. 6" MIN.1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICESTO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANYUP-GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS.3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.4.AFTER SUBGRADE EXCAVATION BUT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION OF THESTORMWATER BMP, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PERFORMDOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER TEST. TEST SHALL OCCUR AT BOTTOM OF SUBGRADEELEVATION OF STORMWATER BMP (CHAMBERS, INFILTRATION BASINS ETC.) AT LOCATION(S)DETERMINED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ON SITE. REPORT INFILTRATION RATES OFSOILS (NATIVE OR IMPORTED) TO CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION RELATED TOTHE BMP. TESTING SHOULD YIELD RESULTS OF APPROXIMATELY TWICE THE DESIGN RATE,PROVIDING A SAFETY FACTOR CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 16.11 OF THE NPDESCONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. IF TEST RESULTS EXCEED 8.5 INCHES PER HOUR,SECTION 16.16 REQUIRES THAT SOILS BE AMENDED TO SLOW THE INFILTRATION RATE BELOW8.3 INCHES PER HOUR.5.POST CONSTRUCTION TESTING OF THE INFILTRATION RATE AND DRAWDOWN PERIOD WILL BEREQUIRED. POST CONSTRUCTION TESTING SHOULD YIELD RESULTS OF APPROXIMATELYTWICE THE DESIGN RATE, PROVIDING A SAFETY FACTOR CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 16.11 OFTHE NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. IF TEST RESULTS EXCEED 8.5 INCHES PERHOUR, SECTION 16.16 REQUIRES THAT SOILS BE AMENDED TO SLOW THE INFILTRATION RATEBELOW 8.3 INCHES PER HOUR.6.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TOTHE STORMWATER SYSTEM.7.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.8.SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE.9.CONSTRUCT RETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA.10.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.11.PLANT AND MULCH SITE.12.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGEAREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED.GENERAL NOTES1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELYFOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TOCONTINUING CONSTRUCTION.2.GRADING OF RETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-COMPACTIONEARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS.3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED RETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BEUNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4.SEE UTILITY PLAN / SHOP DRAWINGS FOR SYSTEM LAYOUT.5.TYPICAL DETAILS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING WITH REVIEWED SHOP DRAWINGS.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING12"16"12"PAVEMENT / LANDSCAPING / SODPERFORATED 42" CMP / HDPECONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM FREE DRAINING SOILS EXIST AT BASE OFSYSTEM. IF NECESSARY, CONTRACTOR MUST OVEREXCAVATE TOREACH SUITABLE SOILS. COORD. W/ GEOTECH. AND CIVIL ENGINEERS.INFILTRATION RATES TO BE BETWEEN 0.45-8.3 IN/HR.SUGRADE SOILS (IN-SITU SAND)FABRIC WRAP TOP AND SIDES WITHMNDOT TYPE 1 GEOTEXTILE(MNDOT 3733)GRADEKEY1. TOPSOIL2. FREE DRAINING ANGULAR DOUBLE WASHED STONE 3/4" - 2" PARTICLE SIZE - NON CARBONATE (LIMESTONE)AND NON CONCRETE. COORDINATE MATERIAL / PARTICLE SIZE W/ MANUFACTURER. INSTALL TO MIN. 95%STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T99.1Page 192 of 492 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.2CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPage 193 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSINLET PROTECTION ATEXISTING CATCH BASINBEING REMOVED, TYP.INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTINGCATCH BASIN TO REMAIN, TYPCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.INLET PROTECTIONAT EXISTING CATCHBASIN TO REMAIN,TYPCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION AT EXISTINGCATCH BASIN BEINGREMOVED(RIM/CASTINGREPLACEMENT), TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT1125ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THISSWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILLREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE ANDCOMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPage 194 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSINLET PROTECTION AT EXISTINGCATCH BASIN TO REMAIN, TYPCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.INLET PROTECTIONAT EXISTING CATCHBASIN TO REMAIN,TYPINLET PROTECTION ATPROPOSED CATCHBASIN, TYPCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP LEGEND:INLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKET1137REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILLREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE ANDCOMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THISSWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL112501" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPage 195 of 492 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS &NARRATIVEREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONTHE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITESOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGEELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNINGAGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTIONPLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A:CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOWLOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED ORSOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCERECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONALCONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITEVEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE(3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDSAFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11,INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDINGALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUALMAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATERMANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THEACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OFEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OFBMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TOCONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLEFOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDETRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAININGDOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR ASSOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PERSECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNERIS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUSTCOMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE AJUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TOCORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN,CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANTEFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TOCORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BYTHE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE INELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS ORGROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G.,NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITHTHE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMITIN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEPSLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASINGAND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BEINITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY ORTEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASECOMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ONTEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEANAGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUSTPROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURINGSPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOILAREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURSDURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OFTEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETESTABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 7CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION INTHAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMDURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DONOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USEAS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSIONPREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED ANDMAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITEAND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB ANDGUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFERZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENTLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTILTHEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVEMAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFYTHESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENTCONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERMCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA ISCOMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILLDRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TOACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES,IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENTCONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOTCOMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTIONUNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G.STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G.,CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUSTDOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OFSTOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDINGSTORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACEFOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THECONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENTSEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUSTRESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE,PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATEDWITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACEWATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESSLIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES,JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, ANDSEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONSIN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINSALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS INACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVALDESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USECONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECTTREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOCPRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASINDRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TOSURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED ANDNUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IFPERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOTADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATERSEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TODISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNERTHAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS ORINUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANTADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FORDISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, ORINCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRECONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTIONPREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUSTREPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THENEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6.PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHESAND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION ANDSEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACEWATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THEAREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL ANDSTABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TOOBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OFOBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ANDFEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK INSURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTERSYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKEDSEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE(1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TOUSERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEYBECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENTWHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THEPROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IFCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ISOCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAYREQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS,INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING,OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEINGCONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONSARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCEACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALLFOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINEDRAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, ORA WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES;ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULDPHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED ORSUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED ASREQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTICSHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TOMINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTSWHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSEDTO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G.,PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNEDTO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL,GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES,ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHERDISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN.R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH.7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKEDOVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKEDCHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADEDINCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSUREADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT ANAPPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUSTREPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE.PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLYEFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEESMUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BYWASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS ANDOTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENTLIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENTSO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUSTPROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUSTINSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRINGTHE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) ANDSTORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHERPARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSIONDATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALLAREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIALVEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOTREQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUSSURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE INPLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THESTRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERCONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THEMPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEESMUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTINGTHE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINALSTABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDINGTHE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111(OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDINGRATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECTAND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OFSTRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OFPERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMITREQUIREMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION ANDMAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTSOF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FORTHEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TOTHE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THEOVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPONREQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPONREQUEST.PALIA LLC C/O NANCY GRASSINI-OLSON1600 W 82ND ST #100,BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431JOHN WILLIAMS952-656-4578JOHN.WILLIAMS@OPUS-GROUP.COMPROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING WITH SURFACE PARKING INTO A NEW OFFICEBUILDING WITH UNDERGROUND PARKING. SITE, GRADING, UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:INFILTRATION IS PROVIDED AS PART OF THE PROJECTS PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO MINNEHAHA CREEK - MINNEHAHA CREEK IS IDENTIFIEDAS AN IMPAIRED WATER BODY PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. MINNEHAHA CREEK IS IMPAIREDFOR BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FISH BIOASSESSMENTS, CHLORID,; DISSOLVEDOXYGEN, AND FECAL COLIFORM . BECAUSE THIS WATER BODY IS LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE, BMPSAS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSIONBUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THATPORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FORCOMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONETIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVEPERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATERSOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:PRESERVING A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED OF THISPROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOT LOCATED ON SITE.DESIGN ENGINEER: DAVID J. KNAEBLE P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 8/22/2012- 8/23/2012TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12DATE OF RECERTIFICATION: 4/22/22EXPIRATION: 5/31/2025NOTES:1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACHSTORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DANDY SACK OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT FOR STRUCTURES WITHOUT CURBING.CURB INLET SACKN T SOVERFLOW IS 12 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHTOVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLYEXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX,AND GRATEDANDY CURB SACK ORAPPROVED EQUIVALENTHIGH-FLOW FABRIC1FLOW24"24"24"MIN.6"6"SEDIMENT FENCEN T SFILTER FABRIC WITHWIRE SUPPORT NETAS SPECIFIED.METAL POSTAS SPECIFIED.SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE4"X4" WIRE HOOKED ONTOPERFORMED CHANNELSON POSTS AS SPECIFIED.EXISTING GROUNDSURFACEMETAL POSTS8'-0" O.C. MAX.CARRY WIRESUPPORT NETDOWN INTOTRENCHANCHOR FABRICWITH SOIL, TAMPBACKFILLFILTER FABRIC ASSPECIFIED SECURETO WIRE SUPPORTNET WITH METALCLIPS 12" O.C.3TYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T SPLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEPMATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL.'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED.DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPEREND OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOPSTRIP 4" AND STAPLE'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10"SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTINGIN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH'E' OVERFALL5PROFILEPLANTO CONSTRUCTION AREAN T SSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS24' (MIN)NOTES:1.PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY.2.THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTOUNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TOTHE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE.3.REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4.ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5.FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.6.CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118.EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAYGEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC6" MIN. CRUSHED STONE75' MINIMUMEXISTINGUNDISTURBEDROADWAYTO CONSTRUCTION AREA 30' FROM EDGE OF ROADTO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP35' R .35' R.4" HIGH, 18"WIDE SPEEDBUMPFINISHEDGRADE6FLOWSEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLYDECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITECONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.8" MIN.EXISTING GROUND SURFACEWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHENINSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDESANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDFILLER AS SPECIFIEDFILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGEWITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOSTTO EMBED ROLL.4= DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOWPLANINLET PROTECTION ROCK FILTERN T SPROPOSED FUTURE CURBAGGREGATEBASE1 12" WASHEDGRAVEL FILTERAGGREGATE BACKFILLSTEEL PLATEIN PLACECATCHBASIN8-12" MINIMUMDEPTH2Page 196 of 492 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION02/24/2025LAND USE APPLICATIONPROJECT MANAGERMATT PAVEKCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 EXT. 701DRAWN BYJRREVIEWED BYMPPROJECT NUMBER2461444263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.02/24/2025ARCADIA 5115 ARCADIA AVENUE, EDINA, MN 55436 OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 10350 BREN RD W, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.3SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTSOILS INFORMATIONGENERAL SITE INFORMATION (5.1)1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES USED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONALTEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (5.5)THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BEINSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED.2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (5.7).SEE PAGE SW1.33. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (5.9):EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES.·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.·LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION.·ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT.WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW, INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER.·METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (5.16)N/A5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (SECTION 23)N/A6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6.B?NOIF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT.7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPAIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT:WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTMLYESIF NO, SKIP TO TRAININGDOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY?YESIF YES:A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONAL BMPS IN SECTION 23 MUST BE ADDEDTO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED (15.19). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THE IDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS.N/A8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS” DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMESN/ASELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SECTION 15)1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE?YESIF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE 16.7 OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUE TO ONE OF THE REASONS IN ITEMS 16.4THROUGH 16.21. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF MEETING WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENT METHOD2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT:INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE SECTION 23 OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD.UNDERGROUND INFILTRATIONCALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D.3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANYPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASS SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (15.8)IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME.4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.N/AEROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (SECTION 8.1)DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION:1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.)BEFORE WORK BEGINS.SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE.2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.):TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES.3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.):SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL.4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODS FOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGEDITCH OR SWALE)FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.)RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS):DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZEDWITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS”. ALL OTHERREMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER, PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.N/A, NO DITCHES ON SITE8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, SLOPEDRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.):OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE.9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO SPECIAL WATERS).N/A10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED FILTRATION AREASMINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO FILTRATION AREAS.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES (SECTION 9.1)DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL:SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES:SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION:SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES:THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTINGDRAINAGE AREA:SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT INFILTRATION AREAS.6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE:LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE:DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 200 FEET OF WETLAND.8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART 9.18 OF THE PERMIT:N/A9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS ) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 14.N/ADEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10.1)1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OFDISCHARGE POINTS (SEE 10.2 THROUGH 10.5 OF THE PERMIT):N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (10.6):N/AADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (SECTION 23.1)1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS?NO2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENTSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIREDPRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED.N/A3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, ANDTEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.N/A4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER).N/A5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUMEFROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THE SAME.N/A6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAMRECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS.N/A7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G.,CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATER POND)?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 OF THE PERMIT.N/AINSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11.1)DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE:·ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THATINSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS.INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST"1. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF BUILDING PRODUCTS WITH A POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER:ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE2. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICAL, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS:ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE3. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR TOXIC WASTE (E.G., OIL, FUEL, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINTSOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVE, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) ACCORDING TO MINN. R. CH. 7045,INCLUDING RESTRICTED ACCESS AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT:ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS.4. DESCRIBE COLLECTION, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035:ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS5. DESCRIBE MANAGEMENT OF PORTABLE TOILETS TO PREVENT TIPPING AND DISPOSAL OF SANITARY WASTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7040:SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER.6. DESCRIBE SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE FOR FUELING AND EQUIPMENT OR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE:EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS.7. DESCRIBE CONTAINMENT AND DISPOSAL OF VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASH WATER AND PROHIBITING ENGINE DEGREASING ON THE SITE:ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE8. DESCRIBE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES SO THAT WASTES DO NOT CONTACT THE GROUND:ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE.FINAL STABILIZATION (25.22)1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS:FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS.2. DESCRIBE METHODS USED TO CLEAN ALL STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT (25.22):CLEANING OF STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS SHALL BE DONE BY HAND SUCH AS THE USE OF A SHOVEL.3. DESCRIBE METHODS FOR REMOVING ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S:REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S CAN BE DONE BY HAND AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF.REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPROJECT LOCATIONADDRESS5100 EDEN AVENUECITY/TOWNSHIPEDINASTATEMNCOUNTYHENNEPINZIP CODE55436PROJECT SIZE1.4 ACRESLATTITUDE/LONGITUDE OF APPROX.CENTROID OF PROJECT 44°54'36'' N, 93°21'07'' WMETHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTIONONLINE TOOLPROJECT TYPECOMMERCIALIMPERVIOUS SURFACES (ACRES)EXISTING1.1PROPOSED1.1DIFFERENCE0.0ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINESTART8/2025END8/2026CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYREDEVELOPMENT OF AN OFFICEBUILDING WITH PROPOSEDUNDERGROUND PARKINGSOIL TYPESSILTY SAND & POORLY GRADED SANDS INTHE NORTH. LEAN CLAY & SANDY LEANCLAY IN THE SOUTH OF THE SITEMAP UNIT SYMBOLMAP UNIT NAMEU6BURBAN LAND-UDORTHENTS(CUT AND FILL LAND)COMPLEXRECEIVING WATER BODIESWATER BODY IDNAME OF WATER BODYWATER BODY TYPESPECIAL WATER (Y/N)IMPAIRED WATER (Y/N)107010206-539MINNEHAHA CREEKSTREAMNY234SITE LOCATION MAP -ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMNOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM(NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT (PERMIT) ISSUED ON AUGUST 1, 2018. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALLPERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.FACILITY INFORMATIONSITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER:CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:INSPECTION INFORMATIONINSPECTOR NAME: _______________________ PHONE NUMBER: _________________________ORGANIZATION/COMPANY MAN: _____________________________________________________DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): _____________________TIME: ____________ AM / PMIS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)?IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT:RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): ____________IS SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER THAT CAN POTENTIALLY RECEIVE DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE?IF YES, FOLLOW SECTION 23 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSNOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION.EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (SECTION 8.1)1.ARE SOILS STABILIZED WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS OCCURRED FOR 14 DAYS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES)?(7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE, OR 24 HOURS DURING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES [DNR] FISHSPAWNING RESTRICTIONS)2.HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED?3.IF STEEP SLOPES ARE DISTURBED, ARE STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES USED?4.ALL DITCHES/SWALES STABILIZED 200' BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE OR PROPERTY EDGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (MULCH,HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, OR SIMILAR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES [BMPS] ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE IN DITCHES/SWALESIF THE SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 2%)ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS?5.DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION (WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION)?6.IS CONSTRUCTION PHASING BEING FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP?7.ARE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MARKED OFF (FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.)?COMMENTS:SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 9.1)1.ARE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS INSTALLED PROPERLY ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS?2.ARE APPROPRIATE BMPS INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS, CATCH BASINS, AND CULVERT INLETS?3.IS A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER PRESERVED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS DURING CONSTRUCTION?3.1.IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED?4.DO ALL ERODIBLE STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROL IN PLACE?5.IS THERE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN ON SITE, AND IS IT BUILT AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14 OF THE PERMIT?6.IS SOIL COMPACTION BEING MINIMIZED WHERE NOT DESIGNED FOR COMPACTION?7.IS TOPSOIL BEING PRESERVED UNLESS INFEASIBLE?8.IF CHEMICAL FLOCCULANTS ARE USED, IS THERE A CHEMICAL FLOCCULANT PLAN IN PLACE?COMMENTS:DISCLOSURES:·AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND ON SITE BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FORMORE DETAILS.·THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL ASEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO SECTION 3, OR THEPROJECT HAS MET THE TERMINATION CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY.Y N N/AY N N/A7 DAY RAINY NMAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS (SECTION 11)1.ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING GROUND COVER?2.ARE PERIMETER CONTROLS MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN ONE-HALF FULL?3.ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTING INLETS?4.ARE THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS BEING MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?5.ARE VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS AT SITE EXISTS IN PLACE AND MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?6.IS ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT BEING REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS?7.HAVE ALL SURFACE WATERS, DITCHES, CONVEYANCES, AND DISCHARGE POINTS BEEN INSPECTED?8.WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION (I.E., SEDIMENT, TURBID WATER, OR OTHERWISE)?IF YES, RECORD THE LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (SIZE, COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, TIME, ETC.).DESCRIBE HOW THE DISCHARGE WILL BE ADDRESSED. WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BE RECOVERED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS ANDIN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 11.5 OF THE PERMIT?COMMENTS:Y N N/APOLLUTION PREVENTION (SECTION 12)1.ARE ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER OR PROTECTED?2.ARE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BEING PROPERLY STORED?3.ARE APPROPRIATE BMPS BEING USED TO PREVENT DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH FUELING AND MAINTENANCE OFEQUIPMENT OR VEHICLES?4.ARE ALL SOLID WASTES BEING PROPERLY CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF?5.IS THERE A CONCRETE/OTHER MATERIAL WASHOUT AREA ON SITE AND IS IT BEING USED?6.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH A SIGN?7.ARE THE CONCRETE/OTHER MATERIAL WASHOUT AREAS PROPERLY MAINTAINED?COMMENTS:Y N N/AOTHER1.IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP, INSPECTION RECORDS, AND TRAINING DOCUMENTATION LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTIONSITE, OR CAN IT BE MADE AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS?2.HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE, AND AMENDED AS NEEDED?3.IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE?IF YES, WHAT BMPS ARE BEING USED TO ENSURE THAT CLEAN WATER IS LEAVING THE SITE AND THE DISCHARGE IS NOTCAUSING EROSION OR SCOUR?4.WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE CREATED FOR THIS PROJECT IF REQUIRED AND INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 15 OF THE PERMIT (IF ADDING AN ACRE OR MORE OF NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE)?IF YES, DESCRIBE:5.IF INFILTRATION/FILTRATION SYSTEMS ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED, ARE THEY MARKED AND PROTECTED FROMCOMPACTION AND SEDIMENTATION?6.DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OFCORRECTIVE ACTIONS:7.PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP:8.POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN:9.ADDITIONAL COMMENTSY N N/AY NATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMATTACHMENT C - CHAMBERFACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE1.ALL GRIT CHAMBERS, SUMP CATCH BASINS, SUMP MANHOLES, OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES ANDOTHER STORM WATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUSTBE INSPECTED IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE INSPECTION DATE, ALLACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORM WATER FACILITY OPERATES ASDESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS,INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, AND UNDESIRABLE VEGETATIONREMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTION OR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED, AND ANYSTRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED.2.VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURINGTHE OPERATIONAL PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTERRAINFALL EVENTS OF 1 INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER ANDDEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION ISREMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENTHAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BEREMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED, AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCEMUST BE STABILIZED. INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPING SEDIMENT ANDTHAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE STORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NOEROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS AND OUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION.MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOILCOMPACTION TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT).3.UNDERGROUND STORAGE CHAMBERS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE STORAGECAPACITY REMAINS. CAPACITY WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE STORAGE VOLUME BY 50PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME. ACCUMULATED DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED, AND INLET AND OUTLETSTRUCTURES WILL BE CLEARED OF ANY FLOW IMPEDIMENTS.Page 197 of 492 5.5 CAL MAPLE5ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE5.5" CAL.4.5 CAL SWAMP WHITE OAK5QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAK4.5" CAL.3.5 CAL BIRCH6BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE` / WHITESPIRE GRAY BIRCH3.5" CAL2.5 CAL RED PINE3PINUS RESINOSA / RED PINE2.5" CAL.2.5 CAL SERVICEBERRY5AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' / AUTUMN BRILLIANCE APPLE SERVICEBERRY2.5" CAL.ARBOR VITAE20THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / AMERICAN ARBORVITAE2" CAL.KARL FOERSTER GRASS40CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' / KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1POLLINATOR MIX1,450 SFASCLEPIAS INCARNATA / SWAMP MILKWEED57#1ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA / BUTTERFLY MILKWEED57#1ASTER LAEVIS / SMOOTH ASTER57#1ECHINACEA PURPUREA / PURPLE CONEFLOWER57#1ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'ALBA' / WHITE CONEFLOWER57#1RUDBECKIA HIRTA / BLACK-EYED SUSAN95#1TALLGRASS MIX965 SFPANICUM VIRGATUM / SWITCH GRASS80#1SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM / LITTLE BLUESTEM80#1DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD750 SFCORNUS STOLONIFERA / RED TWIG DOGWOOD86#5BUSH HONEYSUCKLE3,010 SFLONICERA DIERVILLA / HONEYSUCKLE256#5TURF6,092 SFNO-MOW7,940 SFPLANT SCHEDULECODEDESCRIPTIONQTYCURBCONCRETE CURB68 LFEDGINGSTEEL EDGER1,054 LFMINERAL MULCHMINERAL MULCH7.56 CYPAVINGSTANDARD CONCRETE PAVING10,396 SFINTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE PAVING1,935 SFSITE FURNITUREFREESTANDING CURVED WOOD BENCH44 LFWOOD BENCH TOP14 LFSTAIRSCONCRETE STAIR399 SFWALLCIP CONCRETE WALL214 LFCB-101ED-101MM-01P-01P-02SF-01SF-02ST-01WL-01MATERIALS SCHEDULEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM 2024-1264BMSJS02/21/255115 Arcadia Avenue5115 ArcadiaAvenueEdina, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION2/24/2025No.DescriptionDateLANDSCAPE NOTES ANDSCHEDULESL1.0EXISTING CONDITIONS &SITE REMOVAL NOTESSITE REMOVAL NOTES1.EXISTING SITE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. ACTUALFIELD CONDITIONS MAY VARY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONSAND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVEBEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE ANDARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIRACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THECONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ONSITELOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIREDTO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT EXISTINGUTILITIES OR STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THE WORK SITE.3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION BY CALLINGGOPHER STATE ONE-CALL AT 651-454-0002 (METRO) OR1-800-252-1166 (OUT-STATE).4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITYCOMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OFUTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITYCOMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BEPERFORMED BY UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND FEES WHICH ARETO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FEES AND CHARGES.5.ALWAYS VERIFY BENCHMARK ELEVATIONS BETWEEN TWOBENCHMARKS.6.REMOVAL ITEMS BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTORUNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR REMOVING DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRISIN A LAWFUL MANNER PER LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCIES. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING PERMITS REQUIREDFOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALLBE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADEWITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THESPECIFICATIONS.7.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BEINSTALLED WHERE NECESSARY AND OBTAIN AN NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT. REFER TO CIVIL FOR EROSION CONTROL.8.DAMAGE TO REMAINING EXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE REPLACEDAT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR EXCEEDTHE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO DAMAGE.9.CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER, AND OTHERPOURED CONCRETE ITEMS ARE TO BE REMOVED TO AN EXISTINGEXPANSION OR CONTRACTION JOINT.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TOONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESECONSTRUCTION PLANS. IF DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON THESURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR AT NO ADDITIONALCOST TO THE OWNER. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALS ARE TOBE MADE WITH A VERTICAL SAW CUT OR TO A NEAT MILLED EDGE.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE VEGETATION NOT TO BE REMOVEDBY CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORRE-SEEDING OR SODDING AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION.12.LOCATION AND ELEVATIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MET (ORAVOIDED) SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHFIELD EXPLORATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTORSHALL REPORT TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIESBETWEEN THEIR MEASUREMENTS AND THESE PLANS. CONTRACTORSHALL ALSO MAKE EXPLORATION EXCAVATIONS AND LOCATEEXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OFCONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT REVISIONS TO PLANS IF REVISIONS ARENECESSARY BECAUSE OF ACTUAL LOCATION OF EXISTINGFACILITIES. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE PRECAUTIONARYMEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND OTHEREXISTING LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.13.EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNLESS SPECIFICALLYMARKED ON THIS SHEET.SITE AND LANDSCAPE NOTESSITE PREPARATION NOTES1.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIARWITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPEOF WORK.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THEATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICHMAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLECODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALSSUPPLIED.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS,TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURINGCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BEREPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THENECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTIONBEGINS (MINIMUM 10' CLEARANCE).6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTIONAND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORSWORKING ON SITE.7.UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHESDO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN.8.EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER ANDOTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TOTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME.9.HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WALKS,TRAILS OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENTREQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONSAND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES INALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITECONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANTESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITECONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OFNEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF SUBSTANTIALCOMPLETION. REPAIR OF ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICHMAY OCCUR PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.12.EXISTING TREES OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS FOUND ON SITESHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVEDOR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONSREGARDING EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THEATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL.13.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, UPON DIRECTION OF LANDSCAPEARCHITECT, SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEADWOOD, DAMAGED AND RUBBING BRANCHES.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUESTFOR THE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPEAND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PAYREQUEST.15.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLEAS-BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATIONAND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTIONINSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION.16.SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCHEDULESIF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS ANDDETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES.SOIL TESTING1.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A SOIL SAMPLE(S) FROM PROJECT SITEAND/OR SALVAGED TOPSOIL STOCKPILE AND SUBMIT TOINDEPENDENT TESTING AGENCY. ANALYSIS ANDRECOMMENDATIONS FOR (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO)MACRONUTRIENTS, MICRONUTRIENTS, COMPOSITION AND SOLUBLESALTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO SERIES OF TESTS: FIRST, PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION; SECOND, AFTER SOIL IS AMENDED, PRIOR TOPLANTING.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ANALYSIS RESULTS ANDRECOMMENDATIONS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL PRIOR TO SOIL AMENDMENT AND PRIOR TOPLANTING.GRADING1.ROUGH GRADING AND FINISHED GRADING TO BE DONE BY OTHERSEXCEPT WHERE NOTED.2.GRADING LIMITS ARE DEFINED AS THE JUNCTURE OF PROPOSEDGRADE WITH EXISTING GRADE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.3.GRADING LIMITS AND LIMITS OF WORK SHOWN ON PLAN ARE ONLYAPPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED IN FIELD BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT. WORK OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS WILL BE DONE ATLANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS DIRECTED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING.4.FILL/CUT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 1% MINIMUM GRADE AWAYFROM BUILDINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.5.SALVAGE TOPSOIL FROM THE EARTHWORK AREAS AS APPROPRIATEOR AS INDICATED ON PLANS AND STOCKPILE FOR REUSE.6.MAINTAIN A UNIFORM GRADE BETWEEN CONTOURS IN AREAS TO BEGRADED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.7.ELEVATIONS, IF SHOWN ARE FINISHED ELEVATIONS. SPOTELEVATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CONTOURS.8.ADD EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IF GRADES GREATER THAN 3:1OR IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. REFER TO MNDOT SPECIFICATIONSFOR EROSION CONTROL.9.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OFUNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES,VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVEIF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOTHE OWNER.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER EROSION CONTROLMEASURES AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT EROSION IS KEPT TO ANABSOLUTE MINIMUM.11.PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVERING FOR CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES UNTIL FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETE.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS AS NEEDED.13.PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCESSHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO STATESPECIFICATIONS FOR AGGREGATE BASE AND SILT FENCE.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROLMEASURES PER LOCAL POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ANDSPECIFICATIONS.15.WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF FINISHED SITE GRADING, DISTURBED AREASSHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, MULCH OR ROCK BASE.16.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILTFENCES AND EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED CATCH BASINS, FORTHE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION.17.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURESAFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE.18.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGEAROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THELANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE PROPERSURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN PLANTING AREAS.PLANTING1.SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM APRIL 15 TO JUNE15.2.FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 21 TOSEPTEMBER 30.3.FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 UNTILNOVEMBER 15.4.ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITINGBY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.5.STAKE PROPOSED PLANTING LOCATIONS PER PLAN FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL.6.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OFTHE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE ATLEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREESSHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NOLOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET ANDBOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6'ABOVE PAVED SURFACE.7.INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL AFTER FINAL GRADING ANDCONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.8.INSTALL PLANT MATERIALS PER PLANTING DETAILS.9.SUBSTITUTION REQUESTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL TYPE & SIZE SHALLBE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORCONSIDERATION PRIOR TO BIDDING. SUBSTITUTIONS AFTERBIDDING MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND ARESUBJECT TO CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS.10.ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAYBE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIEDPRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS.11.FERTILIZE PLANT MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOIL TESTRECOMMENDATIONS. [FERTILIZE PLANT MATERIAL UPONINSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL AND OTHER APPROVEDFERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL (PER THEMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS) OR TREAT FOR SUMMER ANDFALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF12 OZ. PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH ANADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING INTHE TREE SAUCER.]12.INSTALL 18" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL IN AREAS RECEIVING GROUNDCOVER, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS. PLANTING SOIL SHALLCONSIST OF MnDOT 3877-B MODIFIED TO CONTAIN A MAXIMUM OF30% SAND, A PH OF 7.1 MAX, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL.13.[TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE PAPER APPLIED FROM TRUNKFLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUSTREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVEWRAPPING AFTER MAY 1.] [DO NOT WRAP TREES.]14.APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL) INANNUAL, PERENNIAL, AND SHRUB BEDS FOLLOWED BY SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION REGARDING USE OF HERBICIDES.MULCHING1.INSTALL [4" DEEP FINELY SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH] RINGS ATCONIFEROUS & DECIDUOUS TREES WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK.2.INSTALL [3" DEEP FINELY SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH] RINGS ATSHRUB PLANTING AREAS WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITHSHRUB STEMS.3.INSTALL [3" DEEP FINELY SHREDDED MULCH] IN PERENNIALPLANTING BEDS. REMOVE ALL MULCH FROM STEMS OF PERENNIALS;PLANT STEMS SHOULD NOT BE IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH MULCH.WATERING1.PLANTED MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED BY TEMPORARY MEANSUNTIL PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED.2.TEMPORARY WATERING MEANS, METHODS, AND SCHEDULING SHALLBE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. REMOVE TEMPORARYWATERING EQUIPMENT UPON PLANT ESTABLISHMENT.WARRANTY1.WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEARFROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIALACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDEREDTURF NOTES1.SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.2.WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADEOF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC.3.SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVESTAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR INDRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY [WITHWOODEN STAKES; NO METAL STAKES ARE ALLOWED].4.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRINGSEED & SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWEDTO JUNE 15.5.FALL SODDING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO NOVEMBER 1.6.NO SOD NETTING ALLOWED ON SITE.IRRIGATION NOTES1.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION THAT MEETS THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE PROVIDED PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONAS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. SUBMIT LAYOUT PLAN ANDSPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THECONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT SODDED/SEEDEDAND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSEAREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY WATER SUPPLY, VOLUME,PRESSURE AND LOCATION FOR SYSTEM TAP PRIOR TO SYSTEMDESIGN.3.[CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY AND INSPECT EXISTINGIRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT, EQUIPMENT, CONDITION ANDOPERABILITY PRIOR TO SYSTEM DESIGN.]4.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATIONWITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOPDRAWINGS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF AREAS RECEIVING DRIP IRRIGATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MULCH.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPEARCHITECT WITH AS-BUILT DRAWINGS, DETAILED SYSTEMOPERATION INSTRUCTIONS AND AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULEAPPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND PLANTEDMATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS.Page 198 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS5,864 SFOFFICE / COMMERCIALDROP-OFFARCADIA AVE 1,479 SFTRASH / SERVICE28,288 SFPARKINGTERRACE4,200 SFLOBBYED EN AV E UP TOLEVEL1.5DOWN TOLEVEL P1SERVICEENTRANCE232 SFFIRE PUMP395 SFELECGARAGEEXHAUST568 SFBIKE308 SFTRASH1A6.2T-01EX. LINDENT-02EX. LINDENT-03EX. SPRUCET-05EX. SPRUCEEX. HACKBERRYTO REMAINEX. LINDENTO REMAINT-07EX. SPRUCET-04EX. LINDENT-06EX. LINDENEX. TREE MASSTO REMAINPROPERTY BOUNDARYEDEN AVE ARCADIA AVE EXISTING TREE TO REMAINREMOVE EXISTING TREETREE PROTECTION FENCELEGENDTREE REMOVAL SCHEDULECODESPECIESSIZET-01T-02T-03T-04T-05T-06T-07LINDENLINDENSPRUCELINDENSPRUCELINDENSPRUCE10" CAL.12" CAL.12" CAL.24" CAL.10" CAL.12" CAL.10" CAL.2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM 2024-1264BMSJS02/21/255115 Arcadia Avenue5115 ArcadiaAvenueEdina, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION2/24/2025No.DescriptionDateTREE PROTECTION PLANL2.0NORTH0SCALE:1"=20'20'40'60'Page 199 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS5,864 SFOFFICE / COMMERCIALDROP-OFFARCADIA AVE 1,479 SFTRASH / SERVICE28,288 SFPARKINGTERRACE4,200 SFLOBBYED EN AV E UP TOLEVEL1.5DOWN TOLEVEL P1SERVICEENTRANCE232 SFFIRE PUMP395 SFELECGARAGEEXHAUST568 SFBIKE308 SFTRASH1A6.2P-01P-02SF-02SF-01P-01P-01P-01ED-101ED-101ED-101ED-101ST-01CB-101WL-01MM-01MM-01TPROPERTY BOUNDARYEDEN AVE ARCADIA AVE CODEDESCRIPTIONQTYCURBCONCRETE CURB68 LFEDGINGSTEEL EDGER1,054 LFMINERAL MULCHMINERAL MULCH7.56 CYPAVINGSTANDARD CONCRETE PAVING10,396 SFINTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE PAVING1,935 SFSITE FURNITUREFREESTANDING CURVED WOOD BENCH44 LFWOOD BENCH TOP14 LFSTAIRSCONCRETE STAIR399 SFWALLCIP CONCRETE WALL214 LFCB-101ED-101MM-01P-01P-02SF-01SF-02ST-01WL-01MATERIALS SCHEDULE2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM 2024-1264BMSJS02/21/255115 Arcadia Avenue5115 ArcadiaAvenueEdina, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION2/24/2025No.DescriptionDateHARDSCAPE PLANL3.0NORTH0SCALE:1"=20'20'40'60'Page 200 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS5,864 SFOFFICE / COMMERCIALDROP-OFFARCADIA AVE 1,479 SFTRASH / SERVICE28,288 SFPARKINGTERRACE4,200 SFLOBBYED EN AV E UP TOLEVEL1.5DOWN TOLEVEL P1SERVICEENTRANCE232 SFFIRE PUMP395 SFELECGARAGEEXHAUST568 SFBIKE308 SFTRASH1A6.22.5 CAL SERVICEBERRY (1)Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'2.5 CAL SERVICEBERRY (3)Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'4.5 CAL SWAMP WHITE OAK (4)Quercus bicolor4.5 CAL SWAMP WHITE OAK (1)Quercus bicolor5.5 CAL MAPLE (4)Acer rubrum5.5 CAL MAPLE (1)Acer rubrum2.5 CAL RED PINE (3)Pinus resinosa3.5 CAL BIRCH (3)Betula populifolia `Whitespire`3.5 CAL BIRCH (3)Betula populifolia `Whitespire`2.5 CAL SERVICEBERRY (1)Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'POLLINATOR MIX (222 sf)9 - Asclepias incarnata9 - Asclepias tuberosa9 - Aster laevis9 - Echinacea purpurea9 - Echinacea purpurea 'Alba'15 - Rudbeckia hirtaBUSH HONEYSUCKLE (1,943 sf)165 - Lonicera diervillaEXISTING TREE MASSEXISTING TREE TO REMAINTALLGRASS MIX (392 sf)33 - Panicum virgatum33 - Schizachyrium scopariumTURF (517 sf)DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD (164 sf)19 - Cornus stoloniferaTURF (517 sf)NO-MOW (7,940 sf)ARBOR VITAE (20)Thuja occidentalisNO-MOW (7,940 sf)EXISTING TREE TO REMAINTKARL FOERSTER GRASS (40)Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster'PROPERTY BOUNDARYEDEN AVE ARCADIA AVE 5.5 CAL MAPLE5ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE5.5" CAL.4.5 CAL SWAMP WHITE OAK5QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAK4.5" CAL.3.5 CAL BIRCH6BETULA POPULIFOLIA `WHITESPIRE` / WHITESPIRE GRAY BIRCH3.5" CAL2.5 CAL RED PINE3PINUS RESINOSA / RED PINE2.5" CAL.2.5 CAL SERVICEBERRY5AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' / AUTUMN BRILLIANCE APPLE SERVICEBERRY2.5" CAL.ARBOR VITAE20THUJA OCCIDENTALIS / AMERICAN ARBORVITAE2" CAL.KARL FOERSTER GRASS40CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' / KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1POLLINATOR MIX1,450 SFASCLEPIAS INCARNATA / SWAMP MILKWEED57#1ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA / BUTTERFLY MILKWEED57#1ASTER LAEVIS / SMOOTH ASTER57#1ECHINACEA PURPUREA / PURPLE CONEFLOWER57#1ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'ALBA' / WHITE CONEFLOWER57#1RUDBECKIA HIRTA / BLACK-EYED SUSAN95#1TALLGRASS MIX965 SFPANICUM VIRGATUM / SWITCH GRASS80#1SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM / LITTLE BLUESTEM80#1DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD750 SFCORNUS STOLONIFERA / RED TWIG DOGWOOD86#5BUSH HONEYSUCKLE3,010 SFLONICERA DIERVILLA / HONEYSUCKLE256#5TURF6,092 SFNO-MOW7,940 SFPLANT SCHEDULETREE REQUIREMENTSMIN. SIZEREQUIREDPROVIDED5.5" CAL. 4.5" CAL.3.5" CAL.2.5" CAL. 2.0" CAL.5566255662TOTAL2424(954 LF / 40 = 23.85)2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM 2024-1264BMSJS02/21/255115 Arcadia Avenue5115 ArcadiaAvenueEdina, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION2/24/2025No.DescriptionDatePLANTING PLANL4.0NORTH0SCALE:1"=20'20'40'60'Page 201 of 492 1136" RADIUSDIG PLANTING PIT 4" TO 6" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADENOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAPTREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATIONSECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOILPREPARATION.EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THEROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE,THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVELMANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THEFIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDERROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DONOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLYWITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALLDOES NOT SHIFT4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALLPLANTING PIT TO BE TWOTO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETEROF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPEDPREPARED PLANTING SOILPER SPEC6' DIAMETERMULCH RINGREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROMTOP HALF OF ROOT BALLEDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLAN4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNKSCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PITWITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PREPARED PLANTING SOILDETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION.12"HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. ORGREATER X 36" HGT; STAKE IN PLACE. PER SPECP-ED-011PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BEDAPPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENTHERBICIDE3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE INCONTACT WITH SHRUB STEMPREPARE BED A MIN. 4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL 12" MIN.SPACINGDETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"EDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLANPLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBSSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SUBGRADECONTAINER GROWN MATERIALSHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENEDP-ED-022PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED1'-6"6"MIN.SPACINGUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOILPLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALSCONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTSH AND LOOSENEDEDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACTWITH PLANT STEMDETAIL - PERENNIAL PLANTING1 1/2" = 1'-0"3P-ED-04HOLD FINISHED GRADE 1/2"BELOW EDGER- SEE PLAN FOREDGE CONDITION3/16" METAL EDGER W/ STAKEPLANTING AREA- SEE PLANTINGPLANTURF- SEE PLANTING PLANDETAIL - STEEL EDGER1 1/2" = 1'-0"P-ED-0942/19/2025 12:34:18 PM PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTION2/19/2025 12:34:18 PM 2024-1264BMSJS02/21/255115 Arcadia Avenue5115 ArcadiaAvenueEdina, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION2/24/2025No.DescriptionDateLANDSCAPE DETAILSL5.0Page 202 of 492 OPUS OFFICE BUILDING SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLANDesignerAJRDate02/19/2025ScaleAS NOTEDDrawing No.Summary1 of 10.40.50.60.70.81.01.01.00.90.90.90.90.90.91.01.01.01.00.90.70.60.50.40.20.20.10.10.10.30.81.91.80.90.60.91.92.61.80.90.60.91.92.51.80.80.60.91.82.41.70.70.70.60.60.81.01.41.81.60.90.40.40.40.30.40.40.30.40.40.40.30.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.71.01.41.81.91.91.61.21.00.80.61.31.61.92.02.01.81.51.21.00.81.41.72.01.91.61.41.10.91.41.71.92.02.01.91.71.51.31.11.41.61.81.92.01.91.81.61.41.21.31.41.61.71.81.81.71.61.51.31.11.21.41.51.61.71.71.61.51.41.01.11.21.41.51.71.71.71.71.50.91.01.11.31.51.71.81.91.91.80.80.91.01.21.41.71.92.12.12.00.70.80.91.11.31.71.92.12.12.00.70.81.31.61.82.02.01.90.61.21.41.61.71.81.61.21.31.41.41.21.11.11.11.00.90.90.80.80.70.70.70.60.60.60.50.52.22.20.20.30.10.20.30.10.20.30.10.20.30.10.20.52.22.91.20.52.22.91.20.52.22.91.20.52.22.91.20.52.21.64.93.01.75.04.93.01.75.04.93.01.75.04.93.01.75.01.44.12.54.91.33.90.31.31.44.12.54.91.33.90.00.00.00.00.05.70.62.74.42.60.72.64.42.60.72.64.42.60.72.64.42.63.35.04.41.54.54.41.54.54.41.54.54.40.74.34.52.60.72.64.42.60.72.64.42.60.72.64.42.60.4 0.45.45.45.45.45.4D @ 12'D @ 12'D @ 12'D @ 12'A1 @ 12'B @ 10'B @ 10'B @ 10'B @ 10'B @ 10'C @ 12'C @ 12'C @ 12'C @ 12'C @ 12'C @ 12'C @ 12'A2 @ 18'A2 @ 18'Plan ViewScale - 1" = 20ftScheduleSymbol Label Image QTY Manufacturer Catalog DescriptionNumberLampsLampOutputLLFInputPowerPolar PlotA11 Lithonia Lighting DSXW2 P2 40K T2S 5000 4000K 70CRI Type 2 Short 1 5813 1 34.84A22 Lithonia Lighting DSXW2 P2 40K TFTM 5000 4000K 70CRI Forward Throw Medium 1 5368 1 34.84B5 Lithonia Lighting WPX0 LED ALO-1 40KMVOLTWPX0 LED, 850 Lumen setting, 4000KSetting, 120-277V1 829 1 6.0096C7 Gotham ArchitecturalLightingIVO4CYL WC D 15LM40K 80CRI WDL9/L14/L16 P BZRIVO4 Wall Cylinder 1500 Lumens 4000K80+ CRI Wide Batwing Open Parabolic DarkBronze no finish1 985 1 14.95D4 Gotham ArchitecturalLightingIVO4CYL WC D 15LM40K 80CRI WDL9/L14/L16 P BZRIVO4 Wall Cylinder 1500 Lumens 4000K80+ CRI Wide Batwing Open Parabolic DarkBronze no finish1 985 1 14.95StatisticsDescription Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/MinProperty Line 0.4 fc 2.7 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/ASurface Lot 1.4 fc 2.2 fc 0.5 fc 4.4:1 2.8:1Terrace 2.0 fc 5.7 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/ALobby 3.1 fc 5.4 fc 0.4 fc 13.5:1 7.8:1Page 203 of 492 Page 204 of 492 Page 205 of 492 468.97270.49158.14Δ=12°39'05"R=716.20D=8°00'00"170.37Point of Beginning of Line A& Line Described in Doc. No. 4517589Point 400 Feet NEFrom the Point of Termination of Line A& Line Described in Doc. No. 4517589Point of Termination of Line A& Line Described in Doc. No. 451758950.00Poin t o f Beg inn ingof De s c r ibed Pa r ce l 50.00Point 440 Feet NEFrom the Point of Termination of Line A& Line Described in Doc. No. 4517589NE Corner of Lot 4,Block 1, "Grand View Heights"N Line of Lot 4, Block 1,"Grand View Heights"& Its E'ly ExtensionBLOCK 1LOT 199.02 30.0030.00Width VariesWidth Var ies Per Doc. No. 377401742.43N45°25'40"E S89°34'20"E 217.09S09°20'17"E 141.75S54°24 '30 "W 111 .49147.10Δ=12°39'05"R=666.2015.37S67°03'35"W43.53N64°10'39"WN00°25'40"E 235.41 30.0030.00 EXCEPTIONNW Corner of Lot 4,Block 1, "Grand View Heights"W Line of Lot 4, Block 1,"Grand View Heights"Access Restriction PerDoc. No. 3774017EXCEPTIONLine Parallel with and Distant 50 Feet FromLine Described in Doc. No. 4517589Line A & L ine De s c r ibed in Do c . No . 451758968.54Point of Beginning of Line ADescribed in Doc. No. 4517589Point of Beginning of a LineDescribed in Doc. No. 451758950.00E'ly Line of Arcadia AvenueA Line Described inDoc. No. 4517589Point 444 Feet SW'ly From the Point of Beginningof Line Described in Doc. No. 4517589Access Restriction PerDoc. Nos. 4517589, 1356024,4637944 & 1421965Access OpeningLine A PerDoc. No. 4517589 W Line of Block 1,"Grand View Heights"Access Restriction PerDoc. No. 1471567618.38 201.86E 1/4 Corner ofSec. 28, Twp. 117, Rng. 21(Coordinate Position)E-W 1/4 Line ofSec. 28, Twp. 117, Rng. 21Per Doc. No. 4517589100.00Access Res t r ic t ion Pe rDoc. Nos . 4517589 , 1356024 ,4637944 & 1421965Access Restriction PerDoc. Nos. 4517589, 1356024& 1471567Corner Falls in Storm ManholeNo Monument Found or SetFound 1 /2 In ch Reba r Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipew/Cap No. 44900Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipew/Cap No. 44900Found Brass Plugw/Cap No. 44900Found Brass Plugw/Cap No. 44900Found Mag Nailw/Disc No. 44900Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipew/Cap No. 44900PID: 2811721310009Address: 5113 Arcadia AvePID: 2811721310010Address: 5100 Eden AvePID: 2811721310011Address: 5100 Eden AvePID: 2811721310012Address: 5100 Eden AvePID: 2811721310013Address: 5100 Eden AvePID: 2811721310035Address: UnassignedPID: 2811721310056Address: UnassignedVICINITY MAPArcadia 5115 Eden Avenue, Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota 55436 10350 Bren Rd W, Minnetonka, MN 55343 Opus Development Company PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 24614COPYRIGHT 2025 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV2.0PRELIMINARY PLAT............N44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.2-20-2025NCLIENT Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BY.CJRS.PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTESPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:Real property in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows:Parcel 1:All of Tract 1 described below:Tract 1:That part of Tracts A, B and C, Registered Land Survey No. 7, described as follows: From a point on Line A described below, distant 400 feetNortheasterly of its point of termination run Northwesterly at right angles to said Line A for 50 feet to the point of beginning of Tract 1 to bedescribed; thence run Northwesterly to a point on the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 4, Block 1, Grandview Heights, distant 30 feetEasterly of the Northeast corner of said Lot 4; thence run Easterly on said Easterly extension for 30 feet; thence run Southeasterly to a pointdistant 50 feet Northwesterly (measured at right angles) of a point on said Line A, distant 440 feet Northeasterly of its point of termination;thence run Southwesterly parallel with said Line A to the point of beginning;Line A: From a point on the East and West quarter line of Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, distant 201.86 feet West of the Eastquarter corner thereof, run Southwesterly at an angle of 96 degrees 39 minutes 13 seconds from said East and West quarter line (measuredfrom East to South) for 618.38 feet; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 13 degrees 58 minutes 55 seconds for 468.97 feet to the point ofbeginning of Line A to be described; thence deflect to the right at an angle of 61 degrees 23 minutes 45 seconds for 270.49 feet; thence deflectto the right on a 08 degrees 00 minute 00 second curve (delta angle 12 degrees 39 minutes 05 seconds) for 158.14 feet; thence on tangent tosaid curve for 170.37 feet and there terminating.(Torrens Property - Certificate of Title No. 1401080)Parcel 2:Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1307, Hennepin County, Minnesota.(Torrens Property - Certificate of Title No. 1401080)Parcel 3:Lot 4, Block 1, Grand View Heights, less and except that portion thereof acquired by the State of Minnesota in Warranty Deed recorded asDocument No. 3774017; and Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Grand View Heights, less and except those portions thereof acquired pursuant to FinalCertificate recorded as Document No. 4517589, Hennepin County, Minnesota.(Abstract Property)This preliminary plat was prepared with the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company,File No. NCS-1245571-MPLS, dated December 31, 2024, provided to us by the client.DATE OF PREPARATION:2-20-2025Please note that the background survey information is per a survey performed by Sunde Land Surveying dated 3/28/2023 provided to us by the client.APPLICANT:Opus Development Company10350 Bren Road W, Minnetonka, MN 55343Kit Bennett952-656-4416kit.bennett@opus-group.comAREAS:Proposed Lot 1 = 59,402 Sq. Ft. or 1.364 AcresFLOOD ZONE:This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community Panel No. 27053C0361F, effective date of November 4, 2016.________________________________________________________Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565rory@civilsitegroup.comPRELIMINARY PLAT:EDEN ARCADIAOVERHEAD UTILITIESGASMAINSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERFIBER/COMM. LINEELECTRIC LINE (RECORD)WATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAIN (RECORD)CHAINLINK FENCE LINELinetype & Symbol Legend CONCRETE SURFACEPAVER SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACEIRON FENCE LINEGUARDRAILWATERMAIN (RECORD)SANITARY SEWER (RECORD)STORM SEWER (RECORD)FIBER/COMM. LINE (RECORD)TELEPHONE LINE (RECORD)TELEPHONE LINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECABLE TV BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXTRAFFIC SIGNALGAS METERELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVEAIR CONDITIONERBOLLARDCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFLAG POLEHANDICAP SYMBOLFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET OR TO BE SET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONPOWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLEGUY WIRECONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREEROOF DRAINSEWER CLEAN OUTFIRE CONNECTIONWELLUTILITY VAULTPOST INDICATOR VALVEGAS MANHOLEHAND HOLEFIBER/COMM. MANHOLEMAIL BOXFUEL TANKELECTRICAL OUTLETSBSOIL BORINGLIGHT POLEACCESS RESTRICTIONWOODEN FENCE LINESATELLITE DISHBUSH/SHRUB60153001530SCALE IN FEETPage 206 of 492 File #193807376 March 17, 2025 DRAFT Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 5115 Arcadia Avenue S Edina, MN Page 207 of 492 March 2025 i DRAFT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-5 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-4 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ........................................ 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ......................................... 4-4 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: March 17, 2025 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 Page 208 of 492 March 2025 1-1 DRAFT 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of a proposed office and commercial building located at 5115 Arcadia Avenue S. in Edina, MN. The proposed project will replace the existing office building at 5100 Eden Avenue S. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard • Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramps • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 northbound ramps • 50th Street/Eden Avenue • Eden Avenue/Willson Road • Eden Avenue/Grange Road • Eden Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp/5115 Arcadia Avenue access • Arcadia Avenue/Eden Avenue • Vernon Avenue/Eden Avenue • Arcadia Avenue/5115 Arcadia Avenue access • Arcadia Avenue/southbound TH 100 ramp connection • Gus Young Ln/Arcadia Avenue The proposed project involves replacing the existing office building with a new 115,000 square foot office building with 6,600 square feet of commercial space and underground parking. The site plan shows 324 total parking spaces. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access point on Arcadia Avenue and one on Eden Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 180 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 217 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,800 trips daily. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 277 spaces for the office and restaurant uses. For office and general retail, the peak parking demand is 242 spaces. • Edina City code requires a base count of 315 stalls with office and retail and 350 stalls with office and restaurant. The project qualifies for transit space reductions resulting in 284 spaces required for office and retail and 315 spaces for office and Page 209 of 492 March 2025 1-2 DRAFT restaurant. • Based on this information, the 324 stalls proposed are expected to accommodate the forecasted peak parking demand. • Future plans for this area include buffered bike lanes on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue and standard bike lanes Arcadia Avenue and Gus Young Lane. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 210 of 492 March 2025 2-1 DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of a proposed office and commercial building located at 5115 Arcadia Avenue S. in Edina, MN. The proposed project will replace the existing office building at 5100 Eden Avenue S. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard • Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramps • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 northbound ramps • 50th Street/Eden Avenue • Eden Avenue/Willson Road • Eden Avenue/Grange Road • Eden Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp/5115 Arcadia Avenue access • Arcadia Avenue/Eden Avenue • Vernon Avenue/Eden Avenue • Arcadia Avenue/5115 Arcadia Avenue access • Arcadia Avenue/southbound TH 100 ramp connection • Gus Young Ln/Arcadia Avenue Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project involves replacing the existing office building with a new 115,000 square foot office building with 6,600 square feet of commercial space and underground parking. The site plan shows 324 total parking spaces. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access point on Arcadia Avenue and one on Eden Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2028. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. Page 211 of 492 March 2025 2-2 DRAFT Page 212 of 492 March 2025 2-3 DRAFT Page 213 of 492 March 2025 3-1 DRAFT 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed project location currently contains an office building at 5100 Eden Avenue. The site is bounded by Arcadia Avenue on the west, Eden Avenue on the south, TH 100 on the east, and the TH 100 exit ramp on the north. Near the site location, Vernon Avenue is a four lane divided roadway with turn lanes and signal control at major intersections. Arcadia Avenue is a two lane roadway that extends between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue. Eden Avenue is a two lane roadway with roundabout control at major intersections. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. Vernon Avenue/Interlachen Boulevard/Gus Young Lane This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides two left turn lanes and one through/right turn lane. Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound approach. Access to and from Arcadia Avenue is limited to right in/right out. The eastbound approach provides one through lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides two through lanes. The northbound approach provides one right turn lane. Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramps This three-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides two through lanes and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, one left turn/through lane, and one channelized right turn lane. The south leg serves as access to southbound TH 100 and to the Arcadia Avenue access ramp. Vernon Avenue/TH 100 northbound ramps Under existing conditions right turn access is provided to northbound TH 100 in both the eastbound and westbound direction. In the future, this will be the location of a new signalized intersection creating full access to and from northbound TH 100. 50th Street/Eden Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound approach. The eastbound approach provides one through lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane and two through lanes. The northbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. Page 214 of 492 March 2025 3-2 DRAFT Eden Avenue/Willson Road This four-way intersection is controlled with a roundabout. All approaches provide a single lane. Eden Avenue/Grange Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a roundabout. All approaches provide a single lane. Eden Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp/5115 Arcadia Avenue access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound approach. Under existing conditions, the south leg provides access to southbound TH 100. This leg will be removed in the near future. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. Arcadia Avenue/Eden Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a roundabout. All approaches provide a single lane. Vernon Avenue/Eden Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. Arcadia Avenue/5115 Arcadia Avenue access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound approach. The northbound approach provides one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. Arcadia Avenue/southbound TH 100 ramp connection This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound approach. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one through lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. The east leg serves as an exit ramp f rom the southbound TH 100 entrance ramp. Gus Young Ln/Arcadia Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound approach. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. The southbound approach provides one through/right turn lane. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/right turn lane. Page 215 of 492 March 2025 3-3 DRAFT Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at each intersection in January, 2025. Existing traffic volume data is presented later in this report. Page 216 of 492 March 2025 3-4 DRAFT Page 217 of 492 March 2025 4-1 DRAFT 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2028. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2025 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2028 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 0.3 percent per year to determine 2028 No-Build volumes. The 0.3 percent per year growth rate was determined from traffic forecasts developed for this area in conjunction with the planned interchange improvements. • 2028 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2028 No-Build volumes to determine 2028 Build volumes. Future Roadway Changes The following roadway changes were assumed to be in place by 2028: • Reconstruction of the TH 100/Vernon Avenue interchange which will add a new full access intersection for access to and from northbound TH 100 and westbound left turn lanes at the TH 100 southbound ramps intersection. • Removal of the southbound entrance ramp on Eden Avenue east of Arcadia Avenue. Trip Generation for Proposed Project The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Weekday PM Peak Hour 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Office (ITE 710) 115,000 SF 154 21 175 28 138 166 1,247 Restaurant (ITE 931) 6,600 SF 4 1 5 34 17 51 553 Totals 158 22 180 62 155 217 1,800 Notes: SF=square feet Page 218 of 492 March 2025 4-2 DRAFT Trip Generation for Other Nearby Development Information on development expected across Arcadia Avenue was obtained from City staff. The expected trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Eleventh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-2. Table 4-2 Weekday Trip Generation for Nearby Development Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour 8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Weekday PM Peak Hour 3:30 to 4:30 p.m. Weekday Daily Senior Housing (ITE 252) 86 DU 6 11 17 12 10 22 279 Restaurant (ITE 931) 13,500 SF 8 2 10 71 34 105 1,132 Totals 14 13 27 83 44 127 1,411 Notes: DU=dwelling units, SF=square feet Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population con centrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 30 percent to/from the north on TH 100 • 30 percent to/from the south on TH 100 • 20 percent to/from the east on 50th Street • 10 percent to/from the north on Interlachen Boulevard • 5 percent to/from the south on Vernon Avenue • 5 percent to/from the south on Normandale Road Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Page 219 of 492 March 2025 4-3 DRAFT Page 220 of 492 March 2025 4-4 DRAFT Page 221 of 492 March 2025 5-5 DRAFT 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay range s from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds f or a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. Page 222 of 492 March 2025 5-6 DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are discussed below. All LOS worksheets are included in the appendix. 2025 Existing Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd Signal C/D C/D Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave NB stop A/C A/B Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramps Signal B/D B/C 50th St/Eden Ave NB stop A/B A/C Eden Ave/Willson Rd Roundabout A/A A/A Eden Ave/Grange Rd Roundabout A/A A/A Eden Ave/TH 100 SB ramp/access SB stop A/C A/C Arcadia Ave/Eden Ave Roundabout B/B A/A Vernon Ave/Eden Ave Signal C/D C/D Arcadia Avenue/access WB stop A/A A/B Arcadia Avenue/SB TH 100 ramp WB stop A/B A/B Gus Young Ln/Arcadia Ave EB stop A/B A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS C or better and movements operate at LOS D or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS C or better and movements operate at LOS D or better. 2028 No Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd Signal C/D C/D Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave NB stop A/C A/C Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramps Signal B/C B/B Vernon Ave/TH 100 NB ramps Signal B/B B/B 50th St/Eden Ave NB stop A/B A/C Eden Ave/Willson Rd Roundabout A/A A/A Eden Ave/Grange Rd Roundabout A/A A/A Eden Ave/TH 100 SB ramp/access SB stop A/B A/B Arcadia Ave/Eden Ave Roundabout A/A A/A Vernon Ave/Eden Ave Signal C/D C/D Arcadia Avenue/access WB stop A/B A/B Arcadia Avenue/SB TH 100 ramp WB stop A/B A/B Gus Young Ln/Arcadia Ave EB stop A/B A/B Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS C or better and movements operate at LOS D or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS C or better and movements operate at LOS D or better. Page 223 of 492 March 2025 5-7 DRAFT 2028 Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd Signal C/D C/D Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave NB stop A/C A/D Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramps Signal B/C B/B Vernon Ave/TH 100 NB ramps Signal B/B B/B 50th St/Eden Ave NB stop A/B A/C Eden Ave/Willson Rd Roundabout A/A A/A Eden Ave/Grange Rd Roundabout A/A A/A Eden Ave/TH 100 SB ramp/access SB stop A/B A/B Arcadia Ave/Eden Ave Roundabout A/A A/A Vernon Ave/Eden Ave Signal C/D C/D Arcadia Avenue/access WB stop A/CB A/C Arcadia Avenue/SB TH 100 ramp WB stop A/B A/C Gus Young Ln/Arcadia Ave EB stop A/B A/B Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS C or better and movements operate at LOS D or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS C or better and movements operate at LOS D or better. Overall Traffic Impact The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on the east side of Arcadia Avenue to a point south of Gus Young Lane, then on the west side to Vernon Avenue. Sidewalk is provided on both side of Eden Avenue and both sides of Vernon Avenue. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include buffered bike lanes on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue and standard bike lanes Arcadia Avenue and Gus Young Lane. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewal k and bicycle facilities in this area. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by Metro Transit route 46 on Vernon Avenue. Page 224 of 492 March 2025 5-8 DRAFT Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. • Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and commercial customers. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 225 of 492 March 2025 6-1 DRAFT 6.0 Parking Analysis The site plan shows 324 total parking spaces on-site. Parking demand was calculated for two options for the commercial space, with the first assuming a restaurant use and the second assuming general retail space. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 277 spaces for the office and restaurant uses. For office and general retail, the peak parking demand is 242 spaces. Edina City code requires a base count of 315 stalls with office and retail and 350 stalls with office and restaurant. The project qualifies for transit space reductions resulting in 284 spaces required for office and retail and 315 spaces for office and restaurant . Based on this information, the 324 stalls proposed are expected to accommodate the forecasted peak parking demand. Page 226 of 492 March 2025 7-1 DRAFT 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 180 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 217 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,800 trips daily. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 277 spaces for the office and restaurant uses. For office and general retail, the peak parking demand is 242 spaces. • Edina City code requires a base count of 315 stalls with office and retail and 350 stalls with office and restaurant. The project qualifies for transit space reductions resulting in 284 spaces required for office and retail and 315 spaces for office and restaurant. • Based on this information, the 324 stalls proposed are expected to accommodate the forecasted peak parking demand. • Future plans for this area include buffered bike lanes on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue and standard bike lanes Arcadia Avenue and Gus Young Lane. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 227 of 492 March 2025 8-1 DRAFT 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets Page 228 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Ave • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 Stormwater Management Report Owner: Opus Development Company (ODC) 10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343 Project: Arcadia 5115 Arcadia Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Engineer’s Certification: All plans and supporting Documentation contained in this report have been reviewed by me and it is hereby certified that to the best of my knowledge the plans comply with the requirements of the ordinance. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. _________________ Matthew R. Pavek P.E. Registration Number: 44263 Date: 02/24/2025 Page 229 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 Table of Contents: 1.0 Cover Sheet, Engineer’s Certification 2.0 Summary Analysis / Narrative 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Existing Site Conditions 2.3 Proposed Site Conditions 2.4 Stormwater Requirements – City 2.5 Stormwater Requirements – Watershed 2.6 Stormwater Requirements – MPCA / NPDES 3.0 Stormwater Calculations 3.1 Proposed Stormwater Management Strategy & Facilities Description 3.2 Rate Control 3.3 Water Quality 3.4 Volume Control 3.5 Flood Separation 4.0 Conclusions Figures: Figure 1 – Drainage Calculations Summary Table Figure 2 – Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map Figure 3 – Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map Appendices: • HydroCAD Existing Conditions HydroCAD Modeling Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Modeling • Soil Boring Location Sketch • Soil Boring Logs • Geotechnical Report (On File at the Office of the Engineer) Page 230 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 2.0 Summary Analysis / Narrative: 2.1 Introduction: This stormwater management report accompanies the Civil Engineering Plans prepared by Civil Site Group for the subject project dated 2/24/25 and serves as attachment D to the storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). This report includes a summary of the existing and proposed site conditions, the stormwater requirements of relevant regulatory agencies, and proposed design calculations and data to meet the requirements. 2.2 Existing Site Conditions: Site Description: The existing site is currently an office building with aboveground parking. The existing site surface coverage areas are shown in the table below: Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value EX1 19674 98 6833 80 26507 93 EX2 26119 98 3479 80 29598 96 EX3 0 98 3297 80 3297 80 EX OFFSITE 1 0 98 1413 80 1413 80 EX OFFSITE 2 0 98 640 80 640 80 Existing Conditions Total AreaImpervious AreaDrainage Area Pervious Area There are no existing stormwater management facilities onsite. Existing Soils: A geotechnical evaluation report was completed by Braun Intertec dated February 13, 2025. This report determined the soils on site are generally silty and clayey soils overlying poorly graded sands some gravel. For the purposes of this report, soils have been assumed to have a hydrologic soil group “D” designation at the surface (majority of borings) and hydrologic soil group “A” at depth.(in the vicinity of the basins) Groundwater: Groundwater not encountered in the soil borings at elevations explored. 2.3 Proposed Site Conditions: Site Description: The proposed site is a redevelopment of the parcel into a new office building, two stories of underground parking, landscaping, and underground stormwater management. The proposed site surface coverage areas are shown in the table below: Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value PR1A 17101 98 321 80 17422 98 PR1B 4808 98 5915 80 10723 88 PR2 26625 98 1916 80 28541 97 PR3 436 98 2280 80 2716 83 PR OFFSITE 1 192 98 307 80 499 87 PR OFFSITE 2 428 98 245 80 673 91 Pervious Area Total Area Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Page 231 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 2.4 Stormwater Requirements City (Edina): The City of Edina defers to the MCWD requirements. 2.5 Stormwater Requirements Watershed (Minnehaha Creek Watershed District)(MCWD): Requirement threshold – Projects greater than 1 acre that disturb greater than 40% of the project site. Rate Control – Runoff rate may not exceed existing conditions for design storm events (1, 10, 25 and 100-yr storm events). Water Quality – Phosphorus control shall be provided in accordance with the volume control rule for redevelopment projects Volume Control – Stormwater runoff volume must be reduced by 1.0” over all the site’s new and reconstructed impervious surfaces. Flood Separation – Must provide two feet of vertical separation between the 100-year HWL and the low building opening. 2.6 Stormwater Requirements - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – NPDES permit (MPCA): Requirement threshold - A permit is required for projects with a disturbed area over 1 acre in size, Stormwater management is required for a project adding 1-acre of more of NEW impervious surface (reconstructed impervious is not included). Rate Control – No specific regulation, may not degrade downstream facilities. Water Quality – Stormwater water quality treatment volume must be provided equal to 1.0” over all new impervious surfaces (includes all newly constructed impervious surfaces only, re-constructed impervious surfaces are not included). Volume Control – Must consider volume reduction if feasible and not prohibited on site. The required infiltration volume is equal to the water quality volume described above. 3.0 Stormwater Calculations: 3.1 Proposed Stormwater Management Strategy & Facilities Description This project is disturbing approximately 1.7 acres of land. The project will be constructing 1.1 acres of new/reconstructed impervious surfaces. This land disturbance and creation of impervious surfaces will trigger stormwater management requirements from the MCWD and the MPCA NPDES permit. The proposed stormwater strategy for this project is directing the site’s stormwater runoff via surface drainage and storm sewer piping to two below ground infiltration basins. The west basin (Basin 1) will discharge into the existing city stormwater facilities along Arcadia Ave. The east basin will discharge into the existing city stormwater facilities along Eden Ave. This stormwater system has been designed to provide for the volume and rate control requirements of the MCWD. 3.2 Rate Control Peak runoff rate may not exceed existing conditions for design storm events (1, 2, 10, and 100-yr storm events). Rate control is provided by live storage within the proposed infiltration basins. This information was derived using HydroCAD stormwater modeling software utilizing Atlas-14 rainfall data. The existing and proposed runoff rates are shown in the summary table below. Page 232 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary 1-Year Event 4.31 0.60 2-Year Event 5.05 1.28 10-Year Event 7.93 6.93 100-Year Event 14.52 14.10 Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Stormwater Rate Summary - Arcadia Ave 1-Year Event 1.93 0.53 2-Year Event 2.27 0.64 10-Year Event 3.60 3.08 100-Year Event 6.65 6.50 Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Stormwater Rate Summary - Eden Ave 1-Year Event 2.33 0.29 2-Year Event 2.71 0.79 10-Year Event 4.18 3.77 100-Year Event 7.51 7.30 Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Stormwater Rate Summary - Hwy 100 1-Year Event 0.08 0.08 2-Year Event 0.11 0.11 10-Year Event 0.22 0.20 100-Year Event 0.50 0.43 Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) The existing project site discharges to three separate drainage subcatchments. Drainage Area EX1 discharges to the West to Arcadia Ave Storm facilities. Drainage Area EX2 discharges to the South to Eden Ave Storm facilities. Drainage Area EX3 discharges to the East overland towards HWY 100. All three drainage areas ultimately discharge to HWY 100 stormwater facilities running parallel with the highway to the North to Minnehaha Creek (per city record & Edina Water Resources online GIS map). Drainage area EX 1 first drains to an existing underground storm water detention system before continuing to HWY 100 stormwater facilities. The proposed site conserves these subcatchments and intercepts stormwater from Drainage area 1 (PR1) & 2 (PR2) and directs that stormwater into Basins 1 & 2 before being allowed to discharge along its existing drainage pattern. The overall discharge rates from the proposed site will be less than the existing discharge rates in all storm events modeled and to all discharge points. Page 233 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 The proposed runoff rates are less that the existing peak runoff rates – REQUIREMENT SATISFIED 3.3 Water Quality Water quality requirements are met by abstraction within the infiltration basins of 1 .0 inches over the new/reconstructed impervious area. The required abstraction volume is provided within basins 1 & 2 for both onsite and offsite new/reconstructed impervious area. The calculations are included in section 3.4 of this report. The project site slopes to the SW of the site towards the existing roundabout. Soil borings ST-7 & ST-8 indicate hydrologic soil group D soils in this area precluding the placement of an underground basin in this area. The soil boring logs are included in the appendix of the report. Since infiltration practices cannot be placed in this area and routing this area to a basin is not feasible due to grades, some impervious surfaces are allowed to run off the site. To mitigate this, BMPs in the form of vegetated filter strips, disconnected impervious surfaces, and vegetated swales are utilized. See the table below for area calculations Stormwater Impervious surface runoff Calculations Onsite disturbed 48970 43726 5244 10.71% Offsite disturbed 5004 620 4384 87.61% Total Disturbed Impervious 53974 44346 9628 17.84% Total New / Reconstructed (SF) Total Routed to Basins 1 & 2 (SF) Total Discharge Offsite Untreated (SF) Total Discharge Offsite Untreated (%) 3.4 Volume Control Stormwater runoff volume must be reduced by 1.0” over all the site’s new and reconstructed impervious surfaces. Water quality and volume control requirements are met by providing infiltration onsite in the amount equal to 1.0 inches of runoff from the new or reconstructed impervious surfaces. The proposed underground Infiltration Basins will be utilized to meet these requirements. Pretreatment will be provided in the form of sumped manholes or solid pipe sections with drawdown risers. The calculations are shown below: Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary New Impv. Area (sf)Required Volume (cf) PR1A 17101 1425 PR1B 4808 401 PR2 26625 2219 PR3 436 36 OFFSITE DIST. IMP AREA*5004 417 TOTAL 53974 4498 Inf. Area (sf)Assoc. Inf. Height (ft)Drawdown Time (h) Infiltration Basin 1 2090 919 2.27 34.10 Infiltration Basin 2 2909 1122 2.59 38.89 Total Provided*4999 *Total Provided volume is the storage volume below the outlet elevations Required Infiltration Vol. Summary Infiltration Volume = 1.0"*Dist. Impv. Area Proposed BMP Area Provided Vol (cf)Drawdown Time Calculations (0.8"/Hour) Drainage Area *Total Offsite New or Reconstructed Impervious Surfaces within the project disturbance limits Page 234 of 492 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 Compliance with the 48-hour drawdown requirement is shown in the table above. Both basins will draw down within 48 hours of a storm event. The calculations below summarize the runoff volume reductions provided by the Basins in the different design storm events compared to the existing conditions Stormwater Volume Summary - Overall 1-Year Event 0.224 0.069 -69.20% 2-Year Event 0.265 0.106 -60.00% 10-Year Event 0.422 0.256 -39.34% 100-Year Event 0.789 0.612 -22.43% Existing Conditions Volume (af) Proposed Conditions Volume (af) Percentage change in Runoff Volume Over Existing Condition As shown in the tables above, the proposed volume of 4,999 CF is larger than the required volume of 4,498 CF – REQUIREMENT SATISFIED 3.5 Flood Separation There must be two feet of vertical separation between the 100-year high water elevation of a waterbody or stormwater practice and the low opening of any structure unless the structure opening is hydraulically disconnected from the waterbody or practice. The low opening elevation of the proposed building is the first-floor elevation, 932.50. The 100-yr HWL of Basin 1 & 2 is 926.99 & 929.82 respectively. This information was obtained using the HydroCAD model. More than 2 feet of separation is provided between the 100-Yr HWL and the low opening of the structure – Requirement Satisfied. 4.0 Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this project meets all State, City, and Watershed stormwater management requirements. Page 235 of 492 Civil Site Group - Stormwater Calculations Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value EX1 19674 98 6833 80 26507 93 EX2 26119 98 3479 80 29598 96 EX3 0 98 3297 80 3297 80 EX OFFSITE 1 0 98 1413 80 1413 80 EX OFFSITE 2 0 98 640 80 640 80 Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value Area [SF]CN Value PR1A 17101 98 321 80 17422 98 PR1B 4808 98 5915 80 10723 88 PR2 26625 98 1916 80 28541 97 PR3 436 98 2280 80 2716 83 PR OFFSITE 1 192 98 307 80 499 87 PR OFFSITE 2 428 98 245 80 673 91 Impervious [SF]Impervious [AC]Pervious [SF]Pervious [AC]Total [SF]Total [AC] Existing Site 45793 1.05 13609 0.31 59402 1.36 Proposed Site 48970 1.12 10432 0.24 59402 1.36 1-YR [2.49'']2-YR [2.86"]10-YR [4.28"]100-YR [7.49"] EX1 1.91 2.24 3.53 6.50 EX2 2.32 2.70 4.15 7.45 EX3 0.08 0.11 0.22 0.50 EX OFFSITE 1 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.21 EX OFFSITE 2 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.10 TOTAL (REACH)4.31 5.05 7.93 14.52 1-YR [2.49'']2-YR [2.86"]10-YR [4.28"]100-YR [7.49"] PR1A 1.45 1.67 2.53 4.46 PR1B 0.53 0.64 1.08 2.12 PR2 2.31 2.67 4.07 7.24 PR3 0.08 0.11 0.20 0.43 PR OFFSITE 1 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.10 PR OFFSITE 2 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.10 Basin 1 0.07 0.23 1.99 4.59 Basin 2 0.29 0.79 3.77 7.09 TOTAL (REACH)0.60 1.28 6.93 14.10 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary 1-Year Event 4.31 0.60 2-Year Event 5.05 1.28 10-Year Event 7.93 6.93 100-Year Event 14.52 14.10 Stormwater Rate Summary - Arcadia Ave 1-Year Event 1.93 0.53 2-Year Event 2.27 0.64 10-Year Event 3.60 3.08 100-Year Event 6.65 6.50 Stormwater Rate Summary - Eden Ave 1-Year Event 2.33 0.29 2-Year Event 2.71 0.79 10-Year Event 4.18 3.77 100-Year Event 7.51 7.30 Stormwater Rate Summary - Hwy 100 1-Year Event 0.08 0.08 2-Year Event 0.11 0.11 10-Year Event 0.22 0.20 100-Year Event 0.50 0.43 Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary New Impv. Area (sf)Required Volume (cf) PR1A 17101 1425 PR1B 4808 401 PR2 26625 2219 PR3 436 36 OFFSITE DIST. IMP AREA*5004 417 TOTAL 53974 4498 Inf. Area (sf)Assoc. Inf. Height (ft)Drawdown Time (h) Infiltration Basin 1 2090 919 2.27 34.10 Infiltration Basin 2 2909 1122 2.59 38.89 Total Provided*4999 *Total Provided volume is the storage volume below the outlet elevations Stormwater Volume Summary - Overall 1-Year Event 0.224 0.069 -69.20% 2-Year Event 0.265 0.106 -60.00% 10-Year Event 0.422 0.256 -39.34% 100-Year Event 0.789 0.612 -22.43% Stormwater Impervious surface runoff Calculations Onsite disturbed 48970 43726 5244 10.71% Offsite disturbed 5004 620 4384 87.61% Total Disturbed Impervious 53974 44346 9628 17.84% Total New / Reconstructed (SF) Total Routed to Basins 1 & 2 (SF) Total Discharge Offsite Untreated (SF) Total Discharge Offsite Untreated (%) Existing Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Drainage Area Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Required Infiltration Vol. Summary Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Site Area Summary Arcadia Pervious Area Total Area Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Total AreaImpervious AreaDrainage Area Pervious Area Stormwater Rate Summary Drainage Area Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Infiltration Volume = 1.0"*Dist. Impv. Area Existing Conditions Volume (af) Proposed Conditions Volume (af) Percentage change in Runoff Volume Over Existing Condition Proposed BMP Area Provided Vol (cf)Drawdown Time Calculations (0.8"/Hour) Drainage Area *Total Offsite New or Reconstructed Impervious Surfaces within the project disturbance limits Page 236 of 492 EXIST CB (ST-168)EXIST CB (ST-116)EX 2EX IMPV = 26,119 SFEX PERV = 3,479 SFTOTAL = 29,598 SFDRAINS TO EDEN AVEEX 3EX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 3,297 SFTOTAL = 3,297 SFDRAINS TO HWY100EX OFF 2EX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 640 SFTOTAL = 640 SFDRAINS ONSITE THENTO EDEN AVEEX OFF 1EX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 1,413 SFTOTAL = 1,413 SFDRAINS ONSITE THEN TOARCADIA AVEEX OFF 2EX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 640 SFTOTAL = 640 SFDRAINS ONSITE THENTO EDEN AVEEX 1EX IMPV = 19,674 SFEX PERV = 6,833 SFTOTAL = 26,507 SFDRAINS TOARCADIA AVEEXIST CB (ST-100)EXIST STMHEXIST 42'' RCPEXIST 66'' RCPEXIST 60'' RCPProject Number:Issue Date:Revision Number:Revision Date:5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422612-615-0060www.CivilSiteGroup.comARCADIA2461402/24/20255115 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 55436EXISTING DRAINAGE MAPDA 1..01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NPage 237 of 492 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSEXIST CB (ST-168)EXIST CB (ST-116)PR1APR IMPV = 17,101 SFPR PERV = 321 SFTOTAL = 17,422 SFDRAINS TO BASIN 1THEN TOARCADIA AVEPR OFF 2PR IMPV = 428 SFPR PERV = 245 SFTOTAL = 673 SFDRAINS ONSITETHEN TO BASIN 2PR3PR IMPV = 436 SFPR PERV = 2,280 SFTOTAL = 2,716 SFDRAINS TO HWY 100PR OFF 1PR IMPV = 192 SFPR PERV = 307 SFTOTAL = 499 SFDRAINS ONSITE THENTO BASIN 1PR 1BPR IMPV = 4,808 SFPR PERV = 5,915 SFTOTAL = 10,723 SFDRAINS TOARCADIA AVEPR 2PR IMPV = 26,625 SFPR PERV = 1,916 SFTOTAL = 28,541 SFDRAINS TO BASIN 2THEN TO EDEN AVEEXIST CB (ST-100)EXIST STMHEXIST 42'' RCPEXIST 66'' RCPEXIST 60'' RCPProject Number:Issue Date:Revision Number:Revision Date:5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422612-615-0060www.CivilSiteGroup.comARCADIA2461402/24/20255115 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 55436PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAPDA 2..01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NPage 238 of 492 EXISTING CONDITIONS EX 1 EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave EX 2 EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave EX 3 EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 EX OFF 1 EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia EX OFF 2 EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave R1 Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) R2 Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168)R3 Hwy 100 Total Total Site Area Routing Diagram for 24614 EXISTING Prepared by Civil Site Group, Printed 2/24/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link Page 239 of 492 24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing (selected events) Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode Duration (hours) B/B Depth (inches) AMC 1 1y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.49 2 2 2y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.86 2 3 10y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.28 2 4 100y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 7.49 2 Page 240 of 492 24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.360 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (EX 1, EX 2, EX 3, EX OFF 1, EX OFF 2) 1.051 98 Paved parking, HSG D (EX 1, EX 2) 1.411 93 TOTAL AREA Page 241 of 492 24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 1.411 HSG D EX 1, EX 2, EX 3, EX OFF 1, EX OFF 2 0.000 Other 1.411 TOTAL AREA Page 242 of 492 24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.360 0.000 0.360 >75% Grass cover, Good EX 1, EX 2, EX 3, EX OFF 1, EX OFF 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.051 0.000 1.051 Paved parking EX 1, EX 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.411 0.000 1.411 TOTAL AREA Page 243 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=26,507 sf 74.22% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.91"Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.91 cfs 0.097 af Runoff Area=29,598 sf 88.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.10"Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.32 cfs 0.119 af Runoff Area=3,297 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.88"Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.08 cfs 0.006 af Runoff Area=1,413 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.88"Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.04 cfs 0.002 af Runoff Area=640 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.88"Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Inflow=1.93 cfs 0.099 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=1.93 cfs 0.099 af Inflow=2.33 cfs 0.120 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=2.33 cfs 0.120 af Inflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 af Inflow=4.31 cfs 0.224 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=4.31 cfs 0.224 af Total Runoff Area = 1.411 ac Runoff Volume = 0.224 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.91" 25.49% Pervious = 0.360 ac 74.51% Impervious = 1.051 ac Page 244 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 1.91 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.097 af, Depth= 1.91" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 19,674 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,833 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,507 Weighted Average 6,833 25.78% Pervious Area 19,674 74.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=26,507 sf Runoff Volume=0.097 af Runoff Depth=1.91" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 1.91 cfs Page 245 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff = 2.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.119 af, Depth= 2.10" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 26,119 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,479 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 29,598 Weighted Average 3,479 11.75% Pervious Area 26,119 88.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=29,598 sf Runoff Volume=0.119 af Runoff Depth=2.10" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.32 cfs Page 246 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.88" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,297 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,297 Weighted Average 3,297 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=3,297 sf Runoff Volume=0.006 af Runoff Depth=0.88" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.08 cfs Page 247 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth= 0.88" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,413 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,413 Weighted Average 1,413 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.04 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.0020 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=1,413 sf Runoff Volume=0.002 af Runoff Depth=0.88" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.04 cfs Page 248 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff = 0.02 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 0.88" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 640 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 640 Weighted Average 640 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.0010 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=640 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=0.88" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.02 cfs Page 249 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.641 ac, 70.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.85" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 1.93 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.099 af Outflow = 1.93 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.099 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210Inflow Area=0.641 ac 1.93 cfs 1.93 cfs Page 250 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.694 ac, 86.38% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.07" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 2.33 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.120 af Outflow = 2.33 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.120 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210Inflow Area=0.694 ac 2.33 cfs 2.33 cfs Page 251 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.076 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.88" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 Inflow Area=0.076 ac 0.08 cfs 0.08 cfs Page 252 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.411 ac, 74.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.91" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 4.31 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.224 af Outflow = 4.31 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.224 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210Inflow Area=1.411 ac 4.31 cfs 4.31 cfs Page 253 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=26,507 sf 74.22% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.25"Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.24 cfs 0.114 af Runoff Area=29,598 sf 88.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.45"Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.70 cfs 0.139 af Runoff Area=3,297 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15"Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.11 cfs 0.007 af Runoff Area=1,413 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15"Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.003 af Runoff Area=640 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15"Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Inflow=2.27 cfs 0.117 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=2.27 cfs 0.117 af Inflow=2.71 cfs 0.140 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=2.71 cfs 0.140 af Inflow=0.11 cfs 0.007 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.11 cfs 0.007 af Inflow=5.05 cfs 0.265 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=5.05 cfs 0.265 af Total Runoff Area = 1.411 ac Runoff Volume = 0.265 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.25" 25.49% Pervious = 0.360 ac 74.51% Impervious = 1.051 ac Page 254 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 2.24 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.114 af, Depth= 2.25" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 19,674 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,833 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,507 Weighted Average 6,833 25.78% Pervious Area 19,674 74.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=26,507 sf Runoff Volume=0.114 af Runoff Depth=2.25" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.24 cfs Page 255 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff = 2.70 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.139 af, Depth= 2.45" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 26,119 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,479 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 29,598 Weighted Average 3,479 11.75% Pervious Area 26,119 88.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3210MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=29,598 sf Runoff Volume=0.139 af Runoff Depth=2.45" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.70 cfs Page 256 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.11 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 1.15" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,297 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,297 Weighted Average 3,297 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=3,297 sf Runoff Volume=0.007 af Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.11 cfs Page 257 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.003 af, Depth= 1.15" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,413 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,413 Weighted Average 1,413 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=1,413 sf Runoff Volume=0.003 af Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.05 cfs Page 258 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff = 0.02 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 1.15" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 640 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 640 Weighted Average 640 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.02 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.0010 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=640 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.02 cfs Page 259 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.641 ac, 70.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.19" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 2.27 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af Outflow = 2.27 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210Inflow Area=0.641 ac 2.27 cfs 2.27 cfs Page 260 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.694 ac, 86.38% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.43" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 2.71 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.140 af Outflow = 2.71 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.140 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3210Inflow Area=0.694 ac 2.71 cfs 2.71 cfs Page 261 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.076 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.15" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.11 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af Outflow = 0.11 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 Inflow Area=0.076 ac 0.11 cfs 0.11 cfs Page 262 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.411 ac, 74.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.25" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 5.05 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.265 af Outflow = 5.05 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.265 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)543210Inflow Area=1.411 ac 5.05 cfs 5.05 cfs Page 263 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=26,507 sf 74.22% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.59"Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=3.53 cfs 0.182 af Runoff Area=29,598 sf 88.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.84"Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=4.15 cfs 0.217 af Runoff Area=3,297 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.28"Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.22 cfs 0.014 af Runoff Area=1,413 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.28"Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.006 af Runoff Area=640 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.28"Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.04 cfs 0.003 af Inflow=3.60 cfs 0.188 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=3.60 cfs 0.188 af Inflow=4.18 cfs 0.220 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=4.18 cfs 0.220 af Inflow=0.22 cfs 0.014 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.22 cfs 0.014 af Inflow=7.93 cfs 0.422 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=7.93 cfs 0.422 af Total Runoff Area = 1.411 ac Runoff Volume = 0.422 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.59" 25.49% Pervious = 0.360 ac 74.51% Impervious = 1.051 ac Page 264 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 3.53 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.182 af, Depth= 3.59" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 19,674 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,833 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,507 Weighted Average 6,833 25.78% Pervious Area 19,674 74.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3210MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=26,507 sf Runoff Volume=0.182 af Runoff Depth=3.59" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 3.53 cfs Page 265 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff = 4.15 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af, Depth= 3.84" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 26,119 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,479 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 29,598 Weighted Average 3,479 11.75% Pervious Area 26,119 88.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=29,598 sf Runoff Volume=0.217 af Runoff Depth=3.84" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 4.15 cfs Page 266 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.22 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.014 af, Depth= 2.28" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,297 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,297 Weighted Average 3,297 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.010 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=3,297 sf Runoff Volume=0.014 af Runoff Depth=2.28" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.22 cfs Page 267 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 30HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 2.28" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,413 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,413 Weighted Average 1,413 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=1,413 sf Runoff Volume=0.006 af Runoff Depth=2.28" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.10 cfs Page 268 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 31HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.003 af, Depth= 2.28" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 640 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 640 Weighted Average 640 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.048 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.04 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.0020 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=640 sf Runoff Volume=0.003 af Runoff Depth=2.28" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.04 cfs Page 269 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 32HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.641 ac, 70.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.52" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 3.60 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.188 af Outflow = 3.60 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.188 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210Inflow Area=0.641 ac 3.60 cfs 3.60 cfs Page 270 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 33HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.694 ac, 86.38% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.80" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 4.18 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.220 af Outflow = 4.18 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.220 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210Inflow Area=0.694 ac 4.18 cfs 4.18 cfs Page 271 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 34HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.076 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.28" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.22 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.014 af Outflow = 0.22 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.014 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.010 Inflow Area=0.076 ac 0.22 cfs 0.22 cfs Page 272 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 35HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.411 ac, 74.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.59" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 7.93 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.422 af Outflow = 7.93 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.422 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)876543210Inflow Area=1.411 ac 7.93 cfs 7.93 cfs Page 273 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 36HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=26,507 sf 74.22% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.71"Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=6.50 cfs 0.340 af Runoff Area=29,598 sf 88.25% Impervious Runoff Depth=7.00"Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=7.45 cfs 0.397 af Runoff Area=3,297 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.15"Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.50 cfs 0.032 af Runoff Area=1,413 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.15"Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.21 cfs 0.014 af Runoff Area=640 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.15"Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.006 af Inflow=6.65 cfs 0.354 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=6.65 cfs 0.354 af Inflow=7.51 cfs 0.403 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=7.51 cfs 0.403 af Inflow=0.50 cfs 0.032 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.50 cfs 0.032 af Inflow=14.52 cfs 0.789 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=14.52 cfs 0.789 af Total Runoff Area = 1.411 ac Runoff Volume = 0.789 af Average Runoff Depth = 6.71" 25.49% Pervious = 0.360 ac 74.51% Impervious = 1.051 ac Page 274 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 37HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 6.50 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.340 af, Depth= 6.71" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 19,674 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,833 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 26,507 Weighted Average 6,833 25.78% Pervious Area 19,674 74.22% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 1: EX 1 - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)76543210MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=26,507 sf Runoff Volume=0.340 af Runoff Depth=6.71" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 6.50 cfs Page 275 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 38HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff = 7.45 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.397 af, Depth= 7.00" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 26,119 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,479 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 29,598 Weighted Average 3,479 11.75% Pervious Area 26,119 88.25% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 2: EX 2 - Drains to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)876543210MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=29,598 sf Runoff Volume=0.397 af Runoff Depth=7.00" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 7.45 cfs Page 276 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 39HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.50 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af, Depth= 5.15" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 3,297 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,297 Weighted Average 3,297 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX 3: EX 3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=3,297 sf Runoff Volume=0.032 af Runoff Depth=5.15" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.50 cfs Page 277 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 40HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff = 0.21 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.014 af, Depth= 5.15" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,413 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 1,413 Weighted Average 1,413 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 1: EX OFF 1 - Drains onsite then to Arcadia Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.23 0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.010 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=1,413 sf Runoff Volume=0.014 af Runoff Depth=5.15" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.21 cfs Page 278 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 41HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 5.15" Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Paved parking, HSG D 640 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 640 Weighted Average 640 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX OFF 2: EX OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=640 sf Runoff Volume=0.006 af Runoff Depth=5.15" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.10 cfs Page 279 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 42HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.641 ac, 70.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.63" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 6.65 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.354 af Outflow = 6.65 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.354 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)76543210Inflow Area=0.641 ac 6.65 cfs 6.65 cfs Page 280 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 43HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.694 ac, 86.38% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 7.51 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.403 af Outflow = 7.51 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.403 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)876543210Inflow Area=0.694 ac 7.51 cfs 7.51 cfs Page 281 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 44HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.076 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.15" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.50 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af Outflow = 0.50 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 Inflow Area=0.076 ac 0.50 cfs 0.50 cfs Page 282 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 EXISTING Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 45HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.411 ac, 74.51% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.71" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 14.52 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.789 af Outflow = 14.52 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.789 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)16 15 14 13 12 11 109876543210 Inflow Area=1.411 ac 14.52 cfs 14.52 cfs Page 283 of 492 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PR OFF 1 PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 PR OFF 2 PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 PR1A PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave PR1B PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave PR2 PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave PR3 PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 R1 Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) R2 Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) R3 Hwy 100 Total Total Site Area 1P Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System 2P Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Routing Diagram for 24614 PROPOSED Prepared by Civil Site Group, Printed 2/24/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link Page 284 of 492 24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing (selected events) Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode Duration (hours) B/B Depth (inches) AMC 1 1y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.49 2 2 2y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.86 2 3 10y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.28 2 4 100y 24hr AT-14 MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 7.49 2 Page 285 of 492 24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.254 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (PR OFF 1, PR OFF 2, PR1A, PR1B, PR2, PR3) 1.133 98 Paved parking, HSG D (PR OFF 1, PR OFF 2, PR1A, PR1B, PR2, PR3) 1.387 95 TOTAL AREA Page 286 of 492 24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 1.387 HSG D PR OFF 1, PR OFF 2, PR1A, PR1B, PR2, PR3 0.000 Other 1.387 TOTAL AREA Page 287 of 492 24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.254 0.000 0.254 >75% Grass cover, Good PR OFF 1, PR OFF 2, PR1A, PR1B, PR2, PR3 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.133 0.000 1.133 Paved parking PR OFF 1, PR OFF 2, PR1A, PR1B, PR2, PR3 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.387 0.000 1.387 TOTAL AREA Page 288 of 492 24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node Number In-Invert (feet) Out-Invert (feet) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) n Width (inches) Diam/Height (inches) Inside-Fill (inches) Node Name 1 1P 924.60 924.40 28.0 0.0071 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 2 1P 924.80 924.70 5.0 0.0200 0.012 0.0 15.0 0.0 3 2P 925.10 922.30 34.0 0.0824 0.012 0.0 12.0 0.0 4 2P 927.35 925.20 62.0 0.0347 0.012 0.0 15.0 0.0 Page 289 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.02 cfs 0.001 af Runoff Area=17,422 sf 98.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.24"Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.45 cfs 0.075 af Runoff Area=10,723 sf 44.84% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.50"Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.53 cfs 0.031 af Runoff Area=28,541 sf 93.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.17"Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.31 cfs 0.118 af Runoff Area=2,716 sf 16.05% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.10"Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.08 cfs 0.006 af Inflow=0.53 cfs 0.038 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=0.53 cfs 0.038 af Inflow=0.29 cfs 0.025 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=0.29 cfs 0.025 af Inflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.08 cfs 0.006 af Inflow=0.60 cfs 0.069 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=0.60 cfs 0.069 af Peak Elev=924.92' Storage=2,171 cf Inflow=1.47 cfs 0.076 afPond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.068 af Primary=0.07 cfs 0.008 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.08 cfs 0.076 af Peak Elev=927.61' Storage=3,101 cf Inflow=2.33 cfs 0.120 afPond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.095 af Primary=0.29 cfs 0.025 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.31 cfs 0.120 af Total Runoff Area = 1.387 ac Runoff Volume = 0.232 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.01" 18.29% Pervious = 0.254 ac 81.71% Impervious = 1.133 ac Page 290 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff = 0.02 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 1.41" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.026 0.025 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.02 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.0010 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.02 cfs Page 291 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff = 0.02 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 1.41" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.026 0.025 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.021 0.02 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.0010 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.02 cfs Page 292 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 1.45 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af, Depth= 2.24" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 17,101 98 Paved parking, HSG D 321 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 17,422 Weighted Average 321 1.84% Pervious Area 17,101 98.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=17,422 sf Runoff Volume=0.075 af Runoff Depth=2.24" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 1.45 cfs Page 293 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 0.53 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af, Depth= 1.50" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 4,808 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,915 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,723 Weighted Average 5,915 55.16% Pervious Area 4,808 44.84% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=10,723 sf Runoff Volume=0.031 af Runoff Depth=1.50" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.53 cfs Page 294 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff = 2.31 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.118 af, Depth= 2.17" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 26,625 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,916 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,541 Weighted Average 1,916 6.71% Pervious Area 26,625 93.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=28,541 sf Runoff Volume=0.118 af Runoff Depth=2.17" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.31 cfs Page 295 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 1.10" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Area (sf) CN Description 436 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,280 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,716 Weighted Average 2,280 83.95% Pervious Area 436 16.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49" Runoff Area=2,716 sf Runoff Volume=0.006 af Runoff Depth=1.10" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.08 cfs Page 296 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.658 ac, 77.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.70" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.53 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af Outflow = 0.53 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 Inflow Area=0.658 ac 0.53 cfs 0.53 cfs Page 297 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.45" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.29 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af Outflow = 0.29 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.020 Inflow Area=0.667 ac 0.29 cfs 0.29 cfs Page 298 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.062 ac, 16.05% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.10" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 Inflow Area=0.062 ac 0.08 cfs 0.08 cfs Page 299 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.387 ac, 81.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.60" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.069 af Outflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.069 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 Inflow Area=1.387 ac 0.60 cfs 0.60 cfs Page 300 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.411 ac, 96.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.21" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 1.47 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.076 af Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 13.19 hrs, Volume= 0.076 af, Atten= 94%, Lag= 63.7 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af Primary = 0.07 cfs @ 13.19 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 924.92' @ 13.19 hrs Surf.Area= 926 sf Storage= 2,171 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 996.9 min calculated for 0.076 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 996.9 min ( 1,754.1 - 757.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 921.50' 976 cf 10.33'W x 89.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,138 cf Overall - 1,700 cf Embedded = 2,439 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 922.00' 1,700 cf CMP Round 42 x 8 Inside #1 Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Chambers in 2 Rows 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 160.4 cf Inside #3 924.60' 22 cf Catch Basin (2 X 3) (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,697 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 924.60 6 0 0 928.31 6 22 22 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 921.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 924.60'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 28.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.60' / 924.40' S= 0.0071 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 924.80'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 5.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.80' / 924.70' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Secondary 928.30'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Page 301 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.46 hrs HW=924.61' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 13.19 hrs HW=924.92' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 0.07 cfs of 0.35 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Inlet Controls 0.07 cfs @ 1.06 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=921.50' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 302 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 42 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing = 58.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 2 = 87.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 89.00' Base Length 2 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 4.50' Field Height 8 Chambers x 192.4 cf + 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 1,699.7 cf Chamber Storage 4,138.5 cf Field - 1,699.7 cf Chambers = 2,438.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 975.5 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,675.2 cf = 0.061 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 64.6% Overall System Size = 89.00' x 10.33' x 4.50' 8 Chambers 153.3 cy Field 90.3 cy Stone Page 303 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10Inflow Area=0.411 ac Peak Elev=924.92' Storage=2,171 cf 1.47 cfs 0.08 cfs 0.02 cfs0.07 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 304 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.16" for 1y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 2.33 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.120 af Outflow = 0.31 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.120 af, Atten= 87%, Lag= 24.2 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af Primary = 0.29 cfs @ 12.53 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 927.61' @ 12.53 hrs Surf.Area= 1,107 sf Storage= 3,101 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 1,025.5 min calculated for 0.120 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 1,025.6 min ( 1,784.0 - 758.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 923.50' 1,592 cf 15.58'W x 70.23'L x 5.50'H Field A 6,019 cf Overall - 2,039 cf Embedded = 3,981 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 924.25' 2,039 cf ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap x 18 Inside #1 Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap 18 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf #3 925.75' 81 cf OCS 2 (Conic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious #4 922.25' 127 cf CBMH 1 (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 3,839 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 925.75 13 0 0 13 932.00 13 81 81 93 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 922.25 13 0 0 932.00 13 127 127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 922.25'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 925.10'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 34.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 925.10' / 922.30' S= 0.0824 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 927.35'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 62.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 927.35' / 925.20' S= 0.0347 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Page 305 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC #4 Secondary 928.70'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF - Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.34 hrs HW=927.37' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.29 cfs @ 12.53 hrs HW=927.61' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 0.29 cfs of 5.36 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Inlet Controls 0.29 cfs @ 1.54 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=922.25' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF - Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 306 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-3500 d rev 03/14 with Cap volume) Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing = 86.0" C-C Row Spacing 9 Chambers/Row x 7.17' Long +1.85' Cap Length x 2 = 68.23' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 70.23' Base Length 2 Rows x 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 15.58' Base Width 9.0" Stone Base + 45.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 5.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 110.0 cf + 14.9 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 2 Rows = 2,038.7 cf Chamber Storage 6,019.3 cf Field - 2,038.7 cf Chambers = 3,980.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,592.2 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,631.0 cf = 0.083 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.3% Overall System Size = 70.23' x 15.58' x 5.50' 18 Chambers 222.9 cy Field 147.4 cy Stone Page 307 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 1y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210Inflow Area=0.667 ac Peak Elev=927.61' Storage=3,101 cf 2.33 cfs 0.31 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.29 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 308 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.72"Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.03 cfs 0.002 af Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.72"Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.03 cfs 0.002 af Runoff Area=17,422 sf 98.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.60"Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.67 cfs 0.087 af Runoff Area=10,723 sf 44.84% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.81"Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.64 cfs 0.037 af Runoff Area=28,541 sf 93.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.53"Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.67 cfs 0.138 af Runoff Area=2,716 sf 16.05% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.38"Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.11 cfs 0.007 af Inflow=0.64 cfs 0.056 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=0.64 cfs 0.056 af Inflow=0.79 cfs 0.043 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=0.79 cfs 0.043 af Inflow=0.11 cfs 0.007 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.11 cfs 0.007 af Inflow=1.28 cfs 0.106 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=1.28 cfs 0.106 af Peak Elev=925.03' Storage=2,240 cf Inflow=1.70 cfs 0.088 afPond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.070 af Primary=0.23 cfs 0.019 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.24 cfs 0.088 af Peak Elev=927.80' Storage=3,199 cf Inflow=2.70 cfs 0.140 afPond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.096 af Primary=0.79 cfs 0.043 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.81 cfs 0.140 af Total Runoff Area = 1.387 ac Runoff Volume = 0.272 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.36" 18.29% Pervious = 0.254 ac 81.71% Impervious = 1.133 ac Page 309 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth= 1.72" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.0020 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.002 af Runoff Depth=1.72" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.03 cfs Page 310 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth= 1.72" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.0020 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.002 af Runoff Depth=1.72" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.03 cfs Page 311 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 1.67 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 2.60" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 17,101 98 Paved parking, HSG D 321 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 17,422 Weighted Average 321 1.84% Pervious Area 17,101 98.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=17,422 sf Runoff Volume=0.087 af Runoff Depth=2.60" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 1.67 cfs Page 312 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 30HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 0.64 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Depth= 1.81" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 4,808 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,915 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,723 Weighted Average 5,915 55.16% Pervious Area 4,808 44.84% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=10,723 sf Runoff Volume=0.037 af Runoff Depth=1.81" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.64 cfs Page 313 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 31HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff = 2.67 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.138 af, Depth= 2.53" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 26,625 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,916 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,541 Weighted Average 1,916 6.71% Pervious Area 26,625 93.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=28,541 sf Runoff Volume=0.138 af Runoff Depth=2.53" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.67 cfs Page 314 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 32HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.11 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 1.38" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 436 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,280 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,716 Weighted Average 2,280 83.95% Pervious Area 436 16.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=2,716 sf Runoff Volume=0.007 af Runoff Depth=1.38" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.11 cfs Page 315 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 33HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.658 ac, 77.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.02" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.64 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af Outflow = 0.64 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 Inflow Area=0.658 ac 0.64 cfs 0.64 cfs Page 316 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 34HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.78" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.79 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af Outflow = 0.79 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.050 Inflow Area=0.667 ac 0.79 cfs 0.79 cfs Page 317 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 35HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.062 ac, 16.05% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.38" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.11 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af Outflow = 0.11 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.12 0.115 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 Inflow Area=0.062 ac 0.11 cfs 0.11 cfs Page 318 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 36HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.387 ac, 81.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.92" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 1.28 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af Outflow = 1.28 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10Inflow Area=1.387 ac 1.28 cfs 1.28 cfs Page 319 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 37HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.411 ac, 96.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.58" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 1.70 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af Outflow = 0.24 cfs @ 12.50 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af, Atten= 86%, Lag= 22.1 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.070 af Primary = 0.23 cfs @ 12.50 hrs, Volume= 0.019 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 925.03' @ 12.50 hrs Surf.Area= 926 sf Storage= 2,240 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 880.3 min calculated for 0.088 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 880.4 min ( 1,635.2 - 754.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 921.50' 976 cf 10.33'W x 89.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,138 cf Overall - 1,700 cf Embedded = 2,439 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 922.00' 1,700 cf CMP Round 42 x 8 Inside #1 Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Chambers in 2 Rows 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 160.4 cf Inside #3 924.60' 22 cf Catch Basin (2 X 3) (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,697 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 924.60 6 0 0 928.31 6 22 22 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 921.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 924.60'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 28.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.60' / 924.40' S= 0.0071 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 924.80'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 5.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.80' / 924.70' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Secondary 928.30'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Page 320 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 38HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.23 hrs HW=924.61' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.23 cfs @ 12.50 hrs HW=925.03' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 0.23 cfs of 0.58 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Inlet Controls 0.23 cfs @ 1.45 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=921.50' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 321 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 39HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 42 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing = 58.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 2 = 87.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 89.00' Base Length 2 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 4.50' Field Height 8 Chambers x 192.4 cf + 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 1,699.7 cf Chamber Storage 4,138.5 cf Field - 1,699.7 cf Chambers = 2,438.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 975.5 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,675.2 cf = 0.061 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 64.6% Overall System Size = 89.00' x 10.33' x 4.50' 8 Chambers 153.3 cy Field 90.3 cy Stone Page 322 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 40HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10Inflow Area=0.411 ac Peak Elev=925.03' Storage=2,240 cf 1.70 cfs 0.24 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.23 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 323 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 41HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.52" for 2y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 2.70 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.140 af Outflow = 0.81 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.140 af, Atten= 70%, Lag= 9.8 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af Primary = 0.79 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 927.80' @ 12.29 hrs Surf.Area= 1,107 sf Storage= 3,199 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 895.6 min calculated for 0.140 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 895.7 min ( 1,651.8 - 756.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 923.50' 1,592 cf 15.58'W x 70.23'L x 5.50'H Field A 6,019 cf Overall - 2,039 cf Embedded = 3,981 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 924.25' 2,039 cf ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap x 18 Inside #1 Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap 18 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf #3 925.75' 81 cf OCS 2 (Conic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious #4 922.25' 127 cf CBMH 1 (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 3,839 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 925.75 13 0 0 13 932.00 13 81 81 93 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 922.25 13 0 0 932.00 13 127 127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 922.25'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 925.10'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 34.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 925.10' / 922.30' S= 0.0824 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 927.35'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 62.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 927.35' / 925.20' S= 0.0347 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Page 324 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 42HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC #4 Secondary 928.70'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF - Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=927.36' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.79 cfs @ 12.29 hrs HW=927.80' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 0.79 cfs of 5.60 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Inlet Controls 0.79 cfs @ 2.01 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=922.25' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF - Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 325 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 43HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-3500 d rev 03/14 with Cap volume) Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing = 86.0" C-C Row Spacing 9 Chambers/Row x 7.17' Long +1.85' Cap Length x 2 = 68.23' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 70.23' Base Length 2 Rows x 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 15.58' Base Width 9.0" Stone Base + 45.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 5.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 110.0 cf + 14.9 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 2 Rows = 2,038.7 cf Chamber Storage 6,019.3 cf Field - 2,038.7 cf Chambers = 3,980.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,592.2 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,631.0 cf = 0.083 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.3% Overall System Size = 70.23' x 15.58' x 5.50' 18 Chambers 222.9 cy Field 147.4 cy Stone Page 326 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 2y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=2.86"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 44HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3210Inflow Area=0.667 ac Peak Elev=927.80' Storage=3,199 cf 2.70 cfs 0.81 cfs 0.02 cfs 0.79 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 327 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 45HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.96"Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.003 af Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.96"Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.003 af Runoff Area=17,422 sf 98.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.01"Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.53 cfs 0.134 af Runoff Area=10,723 sf 44.84% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07"Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.08 cfs 0.063 af Runoff Area=28,541 sf 93.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.93"Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=4.07 cfs 0.214 af Runoff Area=2,716 sf 16.05% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.56"Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.20 cfs 0.013 af Inflow=3.08 cfs 0.126 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=3.08 cfs 0.126 af Inflow=3.77 cfs 0.117 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=3.77 cfs 0.117 af Inflow=0.20 cfs 0.013 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.20 cfs 0.013 af Inflow=6.93 cfs 0.256 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=6.93 cfs 0.256 af Peak Elev=925.62' Storage=2,542 cf Inflow=2.57 cfs 0.137 afPond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.074 af Primary=1.99 cfs 0.063 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=2.01 cfs 0.137 af Peak Elev=928.49' Storage=3,525 cf Inflow=4.12 cfs 0.217 afPond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.100 af Primary=3.77 cfs 0.117 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=3.79 cfs 0.217 af Total Runoff Area = 1.387 ac Runoff Volume = 0.430 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.72" 18.29% Pervious = 0.254 ac 81.71% Impervious = 1.133 ac Page 328 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 46HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.003 af, Depth= 2.96" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.003 af Runoff Depth=2.96" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.05 cfs Page 329 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 47HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.003 af, Depth= 2.96" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.003 af Runoff Depth=2.96" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.05 cfs Page 330 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 48HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 2.53 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.134 af, Depth= 4.01" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 17,101 98 Paved parking, HSG D 321 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 17,422 Weighted Average 321 1.84% Pervious Area 17,101 98.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=17,422 sf Runoff Volume=0.134 af Runoff Depth=4.01" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.53 cfs Page 331 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 49HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 1.08 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Depth= 3.07" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 4,808 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,915 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,723 Weighted Average 5,915 55.16% Pervious Area 4,808 44.84% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=10,723 sf Runoff Volume=0.063 af Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 1.08 cfs Page 332 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 50HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff = 4.07 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Depth= 3.93" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 26,625 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,916 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,541 Weighted Average 1,916 6.71% Pervious Area 26,625 93.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=28,541 sf Runoff Volume=0.214 af Runoff Depth=3.93" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 4.07 cfs Page 333 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 51HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.20 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Depth= 2.56" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Area (sf) CN Description 436 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,280 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,716 Weighted Average 2,280 83.95% Pervious Area 436 16.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.010 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28" Runoff Area=2,716 sf Runoff Volume=0.013 af Runoff Depth=2.56" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.20 cfs Page 334 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 52HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.658 ac, 77.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.29" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 3.08 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.126 af Outflow = 3.08 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.126 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3210Inflow Area=0.658 ac 3.08 cfs 3.08 cfs Page 335 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 53HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.10" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 3.77 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af Outflow = 3.77 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210Inflow Area=0.667 ac 3.77 cfs 3.77 cfs Page 336 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 54HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.062 ac, 16.05% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.56" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.20 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af Outflow = 0.20 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.010 Inflow Area=0.062 ac 0.20 cfs 0.20 cfs Page 337 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 55HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.387 ac, 81.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.21" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 6.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.256 af Outflow = 6.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.256 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)76543210Inflow Area=1.387 ac 6.93 cfs 6.93 cfs Page 338 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 56HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.411 ac, 96.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.98" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 2.57 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.137 af Outflow = 2.01 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.137 af, Atten= 22%, Lag= 2.7 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.074 af Primary = 1.99 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 925.62' @ 12.18 hrs Surf.Area= 926 sf Storage= 2,542 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 608.2 min calculated for 0.137 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 608.3 min ( 1,356.9 - 748.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 921.50' 976 cf 10.33'W x 89.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,138 cf Overall - 1,700 cf Embedded = 2,439 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 922.00' 1,700 cf CMP Round 42 x 8 Inside #1 Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Chambers in 2 Rows 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 160.4 cf Inside #3 924.60' 22 cf Catch Basin (2 X 3) (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,697 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 924.60 6 0 0 928.31 6 22 22 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 921.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 924.60'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 28.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.60' / 924.40' S= 0.0071 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 924.80'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 5.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.80' / 924.70' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Secondary 928.30'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Page 339 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 57HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.07 hrs HW=924.67' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.98 cfs @ 12.18 hrs HW=925.62' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 1.98 cfs of 2.31 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Barrel Controls 1.98 cfs @ 3.30 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=921.50' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 340 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 58HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 42 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing = 58.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 2 = 87.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 89.00' Base Length 2 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 4.50' Field Height 8 Chambers x 192.4 cf + 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 1,699.7 cf Chamber Storage 4,138.5 cf Field - 1,699.7 cf Chambers = 2,438.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 975.5 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,675.2 cf = 0.061 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 64.6% Overall System Size = 89.00' x 10.33' x 4.50' 8 Chambers 153.3 cy Field 90.3 cy Stone Page 341 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 59HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210Inflow Area=0.411 ac Peak Elev=925.62' Storage=2,542 cf 2.57 cfs 2.01 cfs 0.02 cfs 1.99 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 342 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 60HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.91" for 10y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 4.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af Outflow = 3.79 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.217 af, Atten= 8%, Lag= 1.6 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.100 af Primary = 3.77 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 928.49' @ 12.16 hrs Surf.Area= 1,107 sf Storage= 3,525 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 605.2 min calculated for 0.217 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 605.3 min ( 1,355.3 - 749.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 923.50' 1,592 cf 15.58'W x 70.23'L x 5.50'H Field A 6,019 cf Overall - 2,039 cf Embedded = 3,981 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 924.25' 2,039 cf ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap x 18 Inside #1 Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap 18 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf #3 925.75' 81 cf OCS 2 (Conic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious #4 922.25' 127 cf CBMH 1 (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 3,839 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 925.75 13 0 0 13 932.00 13 81 81 93 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 922.25 13 0 0 932.00 13 127 127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 922.25'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 925.10'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 34.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 925.10' / 922.30' S= 0.0824 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 927.35'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 62.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 927.35' / 925.20' S= 0.0347 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Page 343 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 61HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC #4 Secondary 928.70'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF - Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 12.04 hrs HW=927.41' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.76 cfs @ 12.16 hrs HW=928.49' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 3.76 cfs of 6.43 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Inlet Controls 3.76 cfs @ 3.21 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=922.25' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF - Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 344 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 62HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-3500 d rev 03/14 with Cap volume) Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing = 86.0" C-C Row Spacing 9 Chambers/Row x 7.17' Long +1.85' Cap Length x 2 = 68.23' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 70.23' Base Length 2 Rows x 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 15.58' Base Width 9.0" Stone Base + 45.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 5.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 110.0 cf + 14.9 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 2 Rows = 2,038.7 cf Chamber Storage 6,019.3 cf Field - 2,038.7 cf Chambers = 3,980.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,592.2 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,631.0 cf = 0.083 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.3% Overall System Size = 70.23' x 15.58' x 5.50' 18 Chambers 222.9 cy Field 147.4 cy Stone Page 345 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 10y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=4.28"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 63HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210Inflow Area=0.667 ac Peak Elev=928.49' Storage=3,525 cf 4.12 cfs 3.79 cfs 0.02 cfs 3.77 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 346 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 64HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96"Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.006 af Runoff Area=499 sf 38.48% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.96"Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.006 af Runoff Area=17,422 sf 98.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=7.21"Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=4.46 cfs 0.240 af Runoff Area=10,723 sf 44.84% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.09"Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.12 cfs 0.125 af Runoff Area=28,541 sf 93.29% Impervious Runoff Depth=7.11"Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=7.24 cfs 0.388 af Runoff Area=2,716 sf 16.05% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.49"Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.43 cfs 0.029 af Inflow=6.50 cfs 0.293 afReach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Outflow=6.50 cfs 0.293 af Inflow=7.30 cfs 0.290 afReach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Outflow=7.30 cfs 0.290 af Inflow=0.43 cfs 0.029 afReach R3: Hwy 100 Outflow=0.43 cfs 0.029 af Inflow=14.10 cfs 0.612 afReach Total: Total Site Area Outflow=14.10 cfs 0.612 af Peak Elev=926.99' Storage=2,690 cf Inflow=4.55 cfs 0.246 afPond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.078 af Primary=4.59 cfs 0.169 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=4.61 cfs 0.246 af Peak Elev=929.82' Storage=3,782 cf Inflow=7.33 cfs 0.394 afPond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Discarded=0.02 cfs 0.104 af Primary=7.09 cfs 0.288 af Secondary=0.21 cfs 0.002 af Outflow=7.32 cfs 0.394 af Total Runoff Area = 1.387 ac Runoff Volume = 0.793 af Average Runoff Depth = 6.87" 18.29% Pervious = 0.254 ac 81.71% Impervious = 1.133 ac Page 347 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 65HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 5.96" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 1: PR OFF 1 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 1 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.006 af Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.10 cfs Page 348 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 66HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 5.96" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 192 98 Paved parking, HSG D 307 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 499 Weighted Average 307 61.52% Pervious Area 192 38.48% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR OFF 2: PR OFF 2 - Drains Onsite then to Basin 2 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.0050 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=499 sf Runoff Volume=0.006 af Runoff Depth=5.96" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 0.10 cfs Page 349 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 67HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 4.46 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.240 af, Depth= 7.21" Routed to Pond 1P : Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 17,101 98 Paved parking, HSG D 321 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 17,422 Weighted Average 321 1.84% Pervious Area 17,101 98.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: PR1A - Drains to Basin 1 then to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)43210MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=17,422 sf Runoff Volume=0.240 af Runoff Depth=7.21" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 4.46 cfs Page 350 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 68HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff = 2.12 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.125 af, Depth= 6.09" Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 4,808 98 Paved parking, HSG D 5,915 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 10,723 Weighted Average 5,915 55.16% Pervious Area 4,808 44.84% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1B: PR1B - Drains to Arcadia Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)210MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=10,723 sf Runoff Volume=0.125 af Runoff Depth=6.09" Tc=10.0 min CN=WQ 2.12 cfs Page 351 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 69HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff = 7.24 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.388 af, Depth= 7.11" Routed to Pond 2P : Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 26,625 98 Paved parking, HSG D 1,916 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 28,541 Weighted Average 1,916 6.71% Pervious Area 26,625 93.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: PR2 - Drains to Basin 2 then to Eden Ave Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)876543210MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=28,541 sf Runoff Volume=0.388 af Runoff Depth=7.11" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 7.24 cfs Page 352 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 70HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff = 0.43 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 5.49" Routed to Reach R3 : Hwy 100 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Area (sf) CN Description 436 98 Paved parking, HSG D 2,280 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 2,716 Weighted Average 2,280 83.95% Pervious Area 436 16.05% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: PR3 - Drains to Hwy 100 Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.46 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.020 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49" Runoff Area=2,716 sf Runoff Volume=0.029 af Runoff Depth=5.49" Tc=15.0 min CN=WQ 0.43 cfs Page 353 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 71HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.658 ac, 77.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.36" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 6.50 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.293 af Outflow = 6.50 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.293 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R1: Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)76543210Inflow Area=0.658 ac 6.50 cfs 6.50 cfs Page 354 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 72HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.22" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 7.30 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.290 af Outflow = 7.30 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.290 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R2: Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)876543210Inflow Area=0.667 ac 7.30 cfs 7.30 cfs Page 355 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 73HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach R3: Hwy 100 [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.062 ac, 16.05% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.49" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 0.43 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af Outflow = 0.43 cfs @ 12.23 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach Total : Total Site Area Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach R3: Hwy 100 Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.46 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.020 Inflow Area=0.062 ac 0.43 cfs 0.43 cfs Page 356 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 74HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach Total: Total Site Area [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.387 ac, 81.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.30" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 14.10 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.612 af Outflow = 14.10 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.612 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach Total: Total Site Area Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 109876543210 Inflow Area=1.387 ac 14.10 cfs 14.10 cfs Page 357 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 75HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System [88] Warning: Qout>Qin may require smaller dt or Finer Routing Inflow Area = 0.411 ac, 96.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 7.18" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 4.55 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.246 af Outflow = 4.61 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.246 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 11.65 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af Primary = 4.59 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.169 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach R1 : Arcadia Ave Storm System (ST-116) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 926.99' @ 12.12 hrs Surf.Area= 926 sf Storage= 2,690 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 366.5 min calculated for 0.246 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 366.6 min ( 1,108.2 - 741.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 921.50' 976 cf 10.33'W x 89.00'L x 4.50'H Field A 4,138 cf Overall - 1,700 cf Embedded = 2,439 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 922.00' 1,700 cf CMP Round 42 x 8 Inside #1 Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 8 Chambers in 2 Rows 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 160.4 cf Inside #3 924.60' 22 cf Catch Basin (2 X 3) (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 2,697 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 924.60 6 0 0 928.31 6 22 22 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 921.50'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 924.60'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 28.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.60' / 924.40' S= 0.0071 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 924.80'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 5.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 924.80' / 924.70' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #4 Secondary 928.30'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Page 358 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 76HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 11.65 hrs HW=924.61' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=4.54 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=926.95' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Inlet Controls 4.54 cfs @ 5.78 fps) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Passes 4.54 cfs of 6.45 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=921.50' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF Rim ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Page 359 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 77HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 42 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H => 9.62 sf x 20.00'L = 192.4 cf Overall Size= 42.0"W x 42.0"H x 20.00'L 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing = 58.0" C-C Row Spacing 4 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +3.50' Header x 2 = 87.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 89.00' Base Length 2 Rows x 42.0" Wide + 16.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 42.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 4.50' Field Height 8 Chambers x 192.4 cf + 8.33' Header x 9.62 sf x 2 = 1,699.7 cf Chamber Storage 4,138.5 cf Field - 1,699.7 cf Chambers = 2,438.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 975.5 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,675.2 cf = 0.061 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 64.6% Overall System Size = 89.00' x 10.33' x 4.50' 8 Chambers 153.3 cy Field 90.3 cy Stone Page 360 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 78HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Basin 1 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)543210Inflow Area=0.411 ac Peak Elev=926.99' Storage=2,690 cf 4.55 cfs 4.61 cfs 0.02 cfs 4.59 cfs 0.00 cfs Page 361 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 79HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Area = 0.667 ac, 92.35% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 7.09" for 100y 24hr AT-14 event Inflow = 7.33 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.394 af Outflow = 7.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.394 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 11.53 hrs, Volume= 0.104 af Primary = 7.09 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.288 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Secondary = 0.21 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af Routed to Reach R2 : Eden Ave Storm System (ST-168) Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 929.82' @ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 1,107 sf Storage= 3,782 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 357.4 min calculated for 0.394 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 357.5 min ( 1,100.5 - 743.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 923.50' 1,592 cf 15.58'W x 70.23'L x 5.50'H Field A 6,019 cf Overall - 2,039 cf Embedded = 3,981 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 924.25' 2,039 cf ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap x 18 Inside #1 Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap 18 Chambers in 2 Rows Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf #3 925.75' 81 cf OCS 2 (Conic) Listed below (Recalc) -Impervious #4 922.25' 127 cf CBMH 1 (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) 3,839 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 925.75 13 0 0 13 932.00 13 81 81 93 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 922.25 13 0 0 932.00 13 127 127 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 922.25'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 925.10'12.0" Round 12'' Pipe Out (Exist) L= 34.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 925.10' / 922.30' S= 0.0824 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 927.35'15.0" Round 15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) L= 62.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 927.35' / 925.20' S= 0.0347 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Page 362 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 80HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC #4 Secondary 928.70'2.0" x 3.0" Horiz. EOF - Rim C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 11.53 hrs HW=927.35' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.02 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=7.07 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=929.82' (Free Discharge) 2=12'' Pipe Out (Exist) (Passes 7.07 cfs of 7.76 cfs potential flow) 3=15'' Pipe (OCS to Exist) (Inlet Controls 7.07 cfs @ 5.76 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=929.82' (Free Discharge) 4=EOF - Rim (Orifice Controls 0.21 cfs @ 5.09 fps) Page 363 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 81HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-3500 d +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-3500 d rev 03/14 with Cap volume) Effective Size= 70.4"W x 45.0"H => 15.33 sf x 7.17'L = 110.0 cf Overall Size= 77.0"W x 45.0"H x 7.50'L with 0.33' Overlap Cap Storage= 14.9 cf x 2 x 2 rows = 59.6 cf 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing = 86.0" C-C Row Spacing 9 Chambers/Row x 7.17' Long +1.85' Cap Length x 2 = 68.23' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 70.23' Base Length 2 Rows x 77.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing x 1 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 15.58' Base Width 9.0" Stone Base + 45.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 5.50' Field Height 18 Chambers x 110.0 cf + 14.9 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 2 Rows = 2,038.7 cf Chamber Storage 6,019.3 cf Field - 2,038.7 cf Chambers = 3,980.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,592.2 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,631.0 cf = 0.083 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.3% Overall System Size = 70.23' x 15.58' x 5.50' 18 Chambers 222.9 cy Field 147.4 cy Stone Page 364 of 492 MSE 24-hr 3 100y 24hr AT-14 Rainfall=7.49"24614 PROPOSED Printed 2/24/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 82HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Basin 2 - Underground Storage & Infiltration System Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)876543210Inflow Area=0.667 ac Peak Elev=929.82' Storage=3,782 cf 7.33 cfs 7.32 cfs 0.02 cfs 7.09 cfs 0.21 cfs Page 365 of 492 6,914 SF OFFICE / COMMERCIAL DROP-OFF ARCADIA AVE1,376 SF TRASH / SERVICE 29,490 SF PARKING TERRACE 304 SF ELEC 3,595 SF LOBBY BUILDING SERVICESBREEZEWAY BIKE ROOM 14%EDEN A VE 67 STALLS ST-1 ST-2 ST-3 ST-6 ST-5 ST-7 ST-4 ST-8 ST-9 ST-10 ST-11 ST-12 F:\2022\B2210644\CAD\B2210644.dwg,Geotech,1/16/2025 4:10:23 AMbraunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2210644 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified:1/4/25 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information B2210644 BJB 11/3/22 AS Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota Soil Boring Location SketchN DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1" = 40' 40'20' Page 366 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 932.3 0.7 931.0 2.0 926.0 7.0 919.0 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 3 1/2 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, with Sand seams, brown and dark brown, moist FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- SM), fine to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, dry POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) With SILT layer at 20 feet Continued on next page 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 3-9-9 (18) 12" 9-12-15 (27) 0" 14-12-14 (26) 8" 7-6-9 (15) 6" 8-11-12 (23) 2" 5-6-6 (12) 15" 7-8-10 (18) 16" 8-10-12 (22) 17" 8-9-12 (21) 18" 6-7-9 (16) 18" 9-12-16 qₚ tsf MC % 4 4 Tests or Remarks P200=13% No recovery P200=8% Little recovery ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-1 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143529.0 EASTING:508058.9 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/14/22 END DATE:11/14/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:933.0 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-1 page 1 of 2 Page 367 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 892.0 41.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery (28) 18" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-1 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143529.0 EASTING:508058.9 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/14/22 END DATE:11/14/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:933.0 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-1 page 2 of 2 Page 368 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 931.8 0.8 928.6 4.0 923.6 9.0 920.6 12.0 901.6 31.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 3 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, with SILT layers, brown, moist, medium dense (ALLUVIUM) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 6-14-16 (30) 16" 8-12-14 (26) 18" 12-14-15 (29) 16" 6-7-8 (15) 12" 5-5-7 (12) 16" 7-15-15 (30) 5" 7-8-11 (19) 14" 4-10-17 (27) 16" 6-8-10 (18) 15" qₚ tsf MC % 3 Tests or Remarks P200=11% ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-2 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143498.1 EASTING:508150.4 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/15/22 END DATE:11/15/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.6 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-2 page 1 of 1 Page 369 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 932.9 0.3 926.2 7.0 919.2 14.0 900.2 33.0 897.2 36.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace roots, dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL FILL) FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- SM), fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, dry FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- SM), fine to medium-grained, with Gravel, reddish brown to brown, dry FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 8-16-18 (34) 16" 8-16-19 (35) 16" 15-17-23 (40) 15" 13-13-10 (23) 16" 18-24-31 (55) 4" 16-12-10 (22) 14" 50/6" (REF) 2" 6-8-8 (16) 4" 19-18-35 (53) 6" 7-12-16 (28) 14" qₚ tsf MC % 3 4 Tests or Remarks P200=11% Poor recovery due to Gravel ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation Poor recovery due to Gravel Poor recovery due to Gravel Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-3 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143528.5 EASTING:508241.7 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/14/22 END DATE:11/14/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:933.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Grass WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-3 page 1 of 1 Page 370 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 931.5 0.8 930.3 2.0 925.3 7.0 920.3 12.0 908.3 24.0 901.3 31.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 5 1/2 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, with Clay seams, brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (ALLUVIUM) With CLAYEY SAND layers at 20 feet POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 2-4-5 (9) 16" 4-6-5 (11) 12" 17-15-6 (21) 0" 6-3-2 (5) 4" 7-7-7 (14) 15" 5-6-6 (12) 3" 6-7-9 (16) 15" 3-4-4 (8) 14" 5-5-6 (11) 16" qₚ tsf MC % 10 Tests or Remarks No recovery ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-4 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143437.1 EASTING:508046.0 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/15/22 END DATE:11/15/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.3 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-4 page 1 of 1 Page 371 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 932.4 0.6 926.0 7.0 921.0 12.0 914.0 19.0 909.0 24.0 900.0 33.0 897.0 36.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 3 1/2 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist With Sand seams from 2 to 5 feet CLAYEY SAND (SC), slightly organic, dark brown, moist, soft (SLOPEWASH) LEAN CLAY (CL), gray and brown, moist, soft to medium (ALLUVIUM) SILT (ML), with Clay lenses, gray, moist, loose (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray, moist, stiff to very stiff (GLACIAL TILL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 5-5-6 (11) 15" 3-3-4 (7) 15" 1-2-1 (3) 16" 1-2-2 (4) 18" 2-2-3 (5) 18" 1-2-2 (4) 16" 2-4-5 (9) 16" 3-4-6 (10) 16" 7-8-12 (20) 15" 7-8-13 (21) 16" qₚ tsf 3.75 MC % 18 22 31 27 Tests or Remarks OC=3% ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-5 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143393.2 EASTING:508139.1 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/15/22 END DATE:11/15/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:933.0 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-5 page 1 of 1 Page 372 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 931.5 0.7 930.2 2.0 925.2 7.0 920.2 12.0 913.2 19.0 901.2 31.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 6 1/2 inches of bituminous over 2 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, dry FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, tan and brown, dry POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense to dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 3-5-7 (12) 10" 12-22-13 (35) 0" 7-8-10 (18) 15" 5-7-9 (16) 12" 22-15-10 (25) 10" 14-50/5" (REF) 9" 8-10-14 (24) 16" 13-26-12 (38) 16" 6-8-12 (20) 16" qₚ tsf MC % 2 Tests or Remarks No recovery ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-6 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143434.0 EASTING:508241.8 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/15/22 END DATE:11/15/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-6 page 1 of 1 Page 373 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 929.5 1.0 923.5 7.0 918.5 12.0 906.5 24.0 902.5 28.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 7 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, with Sand seams, dark brown, moist With wood chunks at 5 feet FILL: LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, with Sand seams, dark brown, dry CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace fibers, slightly organic, dark brown, moist, medium to stiff (SLOPEWASH) LEAN CLAY (CL), with black inclusions, gray, moist, medium (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray and brown, moist, stiff to medium (GLACIAL TILL) With Silt seams and lenses from 30 to 35 feet Brown at 34 feet Gray at 39 feet Continued on next page 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 3-4-5 (9) 14" 2-1-2 (3) 12" 3-2-3 (5) 14" 1-1-1 (2) 15" 1-2-3 (5) 15" 1-2-3 (5) 16" 4-5-7 (12) 18" 2-3-5 (8) 18" 2-4-5 (9) 18" 2-3-5 (8) 18" 3-5-7 qₚ tsf 3 MC % 7 19 30 23 Tests or Remarks OC=2% OC=4% ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed lowest level slab elevation OC=1% LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-7 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143312.0 EASTING:508049.2 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/14/22 END DATE:11/14/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:930.5 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-7 page 1 of 2 Page 374 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 884.5 46.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, gray and brown, moist, stiff to medium (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery (12) 18" 5-5-7 (12) 16" qₚ tsf 2.25 3 MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed at end of drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-7 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143312.0 EASTING:508049.2 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:11/14/22 END DATE:11/14/22 SURFACE ELEVATION:930.5 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Snow B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-7 page 2 of 2 Page 375 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 930.5 1.0 929.5 2.0 924.5 7.0 919.5 12.0 912.5 19.0 908.5 23.0 906.5 25.0 897.5 34.0 892.5 39.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 8 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, contains seams of Clay, reddish brown, moist FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), slightly organic, trace to with wood chunks, dark brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, with concrete debris, brown, moist FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown, moist With concrete debris at 13 feet LEAN CLAY (CL), contains lenses of Silt, brown and gray, moist, medium (ALLUVIUM) SILT (ML), gray, moist, loose (ALLUVIUM) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, gray, moist, very stiff (GLACIAL TILL) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) Continued on next page 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 3-2-2 (4) 6" 3-3-2 (5) 10" 2-1-1 (2) 14" 3-50/1" (REF) 4" 5-6-4 (10) 6" 7-5-5 (10) 12" 3-4-4 (8) 12" 4-6-4 (10) 14" 6-7-8 (15) 16" 7-8-10 (18) 16" 6-6-8 qₚ tsf MC % 14 19 30 Tests or Remarks Refusal at 10 feet, offset 5 feet east. ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed Lowest Slab Elevation LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-8 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143320.1 EASTING:508122.1 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/14/25 END DATE:01/14/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:931.5 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-8 page 1 of 2 Page 376 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 890.5 41.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery (14) 16" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-8 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143320.1 EASTING:508122.1 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/14/25 END DATE:01/14/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:931.5 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-8 page 2 of 2 Page 377 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 930.8 0.5 924.3 7.0 922.3 9.0 917.3 14.0 902.3 29.0 892.3 39.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 2 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown and brown, moist LEAN CLAY (CL), slightly organic, dark brown, moist, medium (SLOPEWASH) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium to stiff (GLACIAL TILL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff to very stiff (GLACIAL TILL) Gray at 24 feet POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL TILL) Continued on next page 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 4-3-4 (7) 14" 4-6-5 (11) 14" 2-3-3 (6) 10" 3-4-4 (8) 12" 4-4-7 (11) 12" 4-5-7 (12) 14" 4-4-6 (10) 14" 4-6-11 (17) 16" 7-7-10 (17) 10" 4-5-10 (15) 14" 6-7-23 qₚ tsf MC % 20 22 14 Tests or Remarks OC=2% ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed Lowest Slab Elevation LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-9 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143348.4 EASTING:508185.9 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/14/25 END DATE:01/14/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:931.3 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-9 page 1 of 2 Page 378 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 890.3 41.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery (30) 14" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-9 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143348.4 EASTING:508185.9 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/14/25 END DATE:01/14/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:931.3 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-9 page 2 of 2 Page 379 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 931.8 0.8 928.6 4.0 923.6 9.0 908.6 24.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown, moist CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff (GLACIAL TILL) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff to very stiff (GLACIAL TILL) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, very dense to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) Continued on next page 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 8-8-9 (17) 14" 4-6-6 (12) 10" 4-5-7 (12) 10" 6-6-8 (14) 12" 5-6-8 (14) 16" 8-7-10 (17) 0" 10-10-11 (21) 14" 26-50/1" (REF) 1" 10-8-9 (17) 14" 3-6-8 (14) 14" 6-7-12 qₚ tsf MC % 13 16 11 Tests or Remarks ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed Lowest Slab Elevation Blows likely influenced by rock in sampler. Little to no recovery LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-10 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143394.6 EASTING:508249.7 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/14/25 END DATE:01/14/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.6 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-10 page 1 of 2 Page 380 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 891.6 41.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, very dense to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery (19) 14" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-10 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143394.6 EASTING:508249.7 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/14/25 END DATE:01/14/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.6 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-10 page 2 of 2 Page 381 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 931.6 1.2 929.8 3.0 925.8 7.0 918.8 14.0 908.8 24.0 898.8 34.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, little Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, with Gravel, contains seams of Silt, and Clay, brown, moist, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-grained, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) With GRAVEL layer at 35 feet Continued on next page 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 10-8-8 (16) 10" 7-10-7 (17) 0" 3-3-4 (7) 6" 3-4-4 (8) 4" 5-5-6 (11) 6" 4-3-5 (8) 6" 5-5-4 (9) 6" 5-6-8 (14) 8" 6-5-8 (13) 10" 6-4-6 (10) 10" 6-6-8 qₚ tsf MC % 4 4 5 Tests or Remarks No recovery P200=2% ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed Lowest Slab Elevation P200=27% LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-11 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143478.8 EASTING:508245.5 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/13/25 END DATE:01/13/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.8 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-11 page 1 of 2 Page 382 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 891.8 41.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-grained, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery (14) 16" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-11 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143478.8 EASTING:508245.5 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/13/25 END DATE:01/13/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.8 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-11 page 2 of 2 Page 383 of 492 Elev./ Depth ft 931.7 1.2 928.9 4.0 923.9 9.0 918.9 14.0 913.9 19.0 895.9 37.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry With CLAY layer at 7 feet POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, with Gravel, light brown to brown, moist, medium dense to very dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 17-30-17 (47) 14" 10-12-12 (24) 14" 11-13-12 (25) 14" 8-9-8 (17) 0" 7-8-8 (16) 4" 5-7-7 (14) 4" 15-16-12 (28) 10" 8-6-7 (13) 8" 18-20-22 (42) 0" 16-35-50/4" (REF) 10" qₚ tsf MC % 2 2 4 Tests or Remarks P200=5% No recovery ___________________ ////////////////////////////////////// Proposed Lowest Slab Elevation No recovery Refusal at 37 feet on apparent GRAVEL layer Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2210644 Geotechnical Evaluation Eden 100 5100 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota BORING:ST-12 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Hennepin (US Feet) NORTHING:143535.1 EASTING:508197.9 DRILLER:J. Vloo LOGGED BY:A. Schulzetenberg START DATE:01/13/25 END DATE:01/13/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:932.9 ft RIG:7519 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER: B2210644 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:01/28/2025 ST-12 page 1 of 1 Page 384 of 492 SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS QUESTIONNAIRE Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and is encouraging developers and builders to integrate sustainability into design and construction as we work to achieve our community Climate Action Plan goals. This questionnaire is to help Edina staff, Planning Commission and the City Council better understand how your project is integrating sustainability into design and construction. This questionnaire is optional but strongly encouraged. Please return completed questionnaires to Cary Teague, cteague@EdinaMN.gov and Marisa Bayer, mbayer@EdinaMN.gov to be included in your submission packet. If your project is planning to apply for Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning approval or City financing (e.g., Tax Increment Financing), Edina’s Sustainable Building Policy will apply. Please contact Sustainability Manager Marisa Bayer (mbayer@EdinaMN.gov) to set up a policy review meeting as soon as possible. Project Information Project Name Arcadia Office Building Project Address 5100 Eden Avenue Target Construction Start Date Month, Year July 2025 Target Completion Start Date Month, Year November 2026 Building Use Type Office, residential, restaurant, etc.Office Sustainable Design Will this project pursue a sustainability certification? If yes, please name the intended certification program and level. No Will the project utilize Xcel Energy’s free New Building Design Assistance programs and/or CenterPoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs? If no, please explain why. Yes. The process is already underway. Will you be completing a whole building life cycle analysis (LCA)? If yes, what methodology are you using? No Page 385 of 492 Sustainable Building Questionnaire 2 Doc. Rev. 20250313 Sustainable Deconstruction If demolishing an existing building, will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse or donation? If yes, please explain what types of materials and strategies reuse or your intended donation partners. Evaluation of the existing structure isn’t complete. We will look for opportunities to recycle whatever is feasible. Will scrap and excess building elements be separated and recycled? If yes, please describe. Same as above Please describe other strategies in this project related to sustainable deconstruction. Recycling of waste from new construction activities will be evaluated Building Decarbonization Will this project implement electric-powered equipment for space or water heating? If yes, please describe what equipment you will be using and its primary use (e.g., space heating). If no, please describe why you are not using electric-powered equipment for space or water heating. Yes, we anticipate utilizing electric heating elements within the VAV HVAC system to generate heat directed to the perimeter glass areas of the office portion of the building. The domestic water heating systems will most likely utilize electric heating elements also. Will this project integrate design strategies to limit or reduce the amount of on-site fossil gas use? If yes, please describe what strategies you are implementing. If no, please explain why. Design of the HVAC systems is not yet complete. Will this project implement renewable energy generation on-site? E.g., solar photovoltaic, geothermal. If yes, please describe what type of renewable energy generation you will be installing. If no, please describe why you are not integrating on-site renewable energy generation. This is not yet determined. The roof structure will be designed to accommodate a future photovoltaic array Will this project integrate energy efficiency features into design that are above building code requirements? If yes, please describe what type of strategies will be used. If no, please explain why. Design of the HVAC systems is not yet complete. Please describe other strategies or design features in this project related to building decarbonization. The solar orientation of the building places the shortest facades on the east and west, which are the facades that receive the most exposure to solar radiation during the times of year when the need for artificial cooling is greatest. The performance characteristics of the curtain wall glass will vary based on its orientation; east and west facades will limit solar radiation more than north and south facades. Page 386 of 492 Sustainable Building Questionnaire 3 Doc. Rev. 20250313 Managing Stormwater What percentage of the property is impervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 77.1% impervious pre-construction 82.4% impervious post-construction Will there be new pervious surfaces added to the site? E.g., new greenspace, pervious pavers. If yes, please describe. The entirety of the site will be disturbed. Any area that is not proposed impervious will be proposed managed greenspace (landscaped area). What stormwater retention, filtration or other management features will be installed? E.g., green roof, rain gardens. Two underground infiltration systems are proposed which are sized to treat more than 90% of the average yearly rainfall. Please describe other strategies or design features in this project related to managing stormwater. Disconnected impervious surfaces will be utilized, pretreatment of stormwater prior to infiltration will be provided, and the rate at which stormwater is allowed to leave the site will be less than existing conditions for all storm events modeled. New planted boulevards between the street and sidewalk will help limit runoff from city sidewalks Promoting Native Plantings and Reducing Heat Island Effect What percentage of the property is covered by tree canopy before development? What is the percent post development? Pre tree canopy: 1.5% Post tree canopy: 9.3% Will you be creating natural or artificial shade opportunities on site? If yes, please describe. Yes. New canopy trees in boulevards will help shade the sidewalks and terraces. How will landscaping incorporate native and climate adaptive plantings and trees? Native trees and drought-tolerant plantings shape a vibrant streetscape, fostering biodiversity, enhancing habitat, and adapting to evolving climate challenges with resilience and beauty. Please describe other strategies or design features in this project related to promoting native and climate adaptive landscaping and reducing the heat island effect. The landscape features boulevard trees, native drought- tolerant trees, and pollinator perennials, creating resilient habitats that support biodiversity and thrive as an ecologically rich environment in changing climate conditions. Managing Water Consumption Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? If yes, please describe. ESG will analyze Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? If yes, please describe. No Page 387 of 492 Sustainable Building Questionnaire 4 Doc. Rev. 20250313 Will outdoor landscaping watering systems include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? If yes, please describe. Yes Please describe other strategies or design features in this project related to water conservation. The landscape integrates a highly efficient irrigation system with a smart controller and weather rain sensor, optimizing water use, reducing waste, and ensuring sustainable, adaptive hydration for plant health and resilience. Managing Waste Diversion Once occupied, is there a plan for traditional or organics recycling services for the building? Yes, please describe. No Please describe other strategies or design features in this project related to operational waste diversion (i.e., diverting waste from trash and landfilling). Sustainable Transportation If the site is accessible by a public transit stop within one half mile, how will the project incorporate site features and design elements to ease site access by transit users? ESG will analyze Will bike parking be provided on site? If yes, please describe the type of parking available (public, secured, etc.) Yes. A bike room will provide indoor bicycle parking for tenants. Outdoor bike racks will be available for building visitors. Will EV charging, either EV-ready or EV-installed, be provided? If yes, please describe the type of charging and number of spaces. Yes. The number of stalls has not yet been determined. Please describe other strategies or design features in this project related to sustainable transportation. Page 388 of 492 GrandView District Development FrameworkEdina, MinnesotaDecember 7, 2011Revised January 17, 2012Revised January 25, 2012Revised January 31, 2012Revised March 27, 2012Revised April 5, 2012Page 389 of 492 24/05/12Ken Potts Kim Melin Randy Halvorson Chris Rofi dal Steve Buss Gene Persha Richard Borland Larry Chestler Laura Giertsen Ellen Jones Terry Ahlstrum Dick Ward Bill Neuendorf Tim McIlwain Bright Dornblaser Andy Brown Suzanne Davison Greg Domke Sandy Fox Dick Crockett Arne Cook Tom Bonneville Kim Montgomery Tim Murphy Th omas RaeuchleTom RuppertPeter Sussman Lisa Diehl Bob Kojetin David Davison Bernie Beaver Mike Platteter Peyton Robb Dan Gieseke Diane Reinhart James Justice Darcy Winter Paul Nelson David Novak Linda Urban Tom Mattison Ken and Adele Floren Michael Schroeder Jim SmithKevin Staunton, ChairMichael Fischer Brett Johnson Collin Bredeson Deron Lindquist Eric Bredesen Jim BaischSteering CommitteeConsultant TeamCuningham Group Architecture, PAClose Landscape ArchitectureHR GreenCommunity Design GroupSpringsted Inc.Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 31. Hope for Change 52. Thoughts and Interactions 63. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 94. Moving Forward with a Purpose 455. Appendix 57Page 390 of 492 34/05/122. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure to:• Make the District accessible and inviting to pedestrians and cyclists;• Create connections between the diff erent parts of the District;• Maintain automobile-friendly access to convenience retail; • Create separate pathways for “pass-through” and “destination” automobile traffi c; and• Preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor in a way that ensures that the kinds of opportunities pursued in the future are consistent with the character we envision for the District and provide benefi t to the surrounding neighborhood.3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-creating changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voluntary private redevelopment consistent with the vision that improves the quality of the neighborhood for residents, businesses, and property owners. Th is Development Framework makes substantial progress in charting the path to be followed in redeveloping the GrandView District. By creating a vision that meets the seven Guiding Principles, it provides guidance to city offi cials, residents, business and property owners, and developers as opportunities for change emerge in the District. To ensure that the future redevelopment of the District is consistent with the vision articulated in this Framework, we recommend that it become part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.Executive SummaryTh e Development Framework presented here is part of a small area planning process required by Edina’s Comprehensive Plan for those parts of our community (like the GrandView District) designated as Potential Areas of Change. It follows the 2010 GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan process. Th at process – led by a group of community residents and business and property owners – resulted in adoption by the Edina City Council of seven Guiding Principles for the redevelopment of the GrandView District.Th e process of crafting this Development Framework has been led by a 52-member Steering Committee made up of residents of the community and owners of area businesses and properties. Th e 52 members of the Steering Committee have dedicated countless hours since April of 2011 listening to community members, considering options, and debating alternatives for the future of the District. Th anks to a grant from the Metropolitan Council, we have had the good fortune to be supported in our eff orts by a talented group of consulting experts. We have also been fortunate to have the patient support of City staff throughout the process.Our objective in creating this Development Framework is to build upon the seven Guiding Principles adopted by the City Council. In the pages that follow, we share a vision of how to bring those Guiding Principles to life. While there are many details essential to fulfi lling that vision, our goals can be summarized as eff orts to:1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements like:• A central commons on the Public Works site with indoor and outdoor public space that connects the civic cornerstones of the District and serves the neighborhood and community needs;• A “gateway” at Highway 100 that announces the District as a special place, using elements like an iconic pedestrian and bicycle bridge spanning Highway 100; and• An innovative, cutting-edge approach to 21st-century sustainability.Page 391 of 492 44/05/12We want to be clear, however, that we recognize that the Framework (like the Comprehensive Plan) provides broad direction rather than detailed requirements. Th is Framework is intended to be a vision of the future rather than a blueprint. Achieving the vision will require, among other things:• A feasibility study that examines the costs and resources available to bear those costs;• An examination of the height and density necessary to make the vision fi nancially feasible while ensuring that it results in the human scale and neighborhood character that is the essential to the Framework;• Developing a strategy to allow for a vibrant business and residential community by managing the mix of retail, offi ce, residential, and public uses of land while maintaining the currently successful neighborhood service and convenience character;• A determination of a range of possible housing choices that support the character and experience of the District.• A community building/public green programming group should work to determine appropriate program and uses.We discuss these and other “next steps” in the Implementation section. Consistent with the “community-led” spirit of the initial stages of this process, we recommend that these “next steps” include active participation by community members, support of staff , and leadership from the City Council. Study Area LocationPage 392 of 492 4/05/121. Hope for ChangePage 393 of 492 64/05/121. Hope for ChangeIntroductionHope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration, participation, and planning. Th ousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small) have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders, business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed offi cials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. Th e result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy, policy, and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable, memorable ways.Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010Page 394 of 492 74/05/121. Hope for Change1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development.2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business.3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area.4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-fi lled place.5. Organize parking as an eff ective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor.7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development refl ecting Edina’s innovative development heritage.The Seven Guiding PrinciplesGuiding PrinciplesPrinciples Related to the Concept Diagram1. Leverage publicly owned parcels2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents3. Turn barriers into opportunities4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive5. Organize parking; provide convenience6. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement7. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative161226374457Page 395 of 492 84/05/121. Hope for ChangeHistoryBefore Edina became a village almost 125 years ago, a country market road crossed Minnehaha Creek at Edina Mills. Headed westward to the high ground, it branched out as Eden Prairie Road and Hopkins Road. In 1869, the Yancey family moved from Ohio and purchased 127 acres of land including that high ground and most of the present GrandView District. Civil War veteran Beverly C., his wife Ellen and their seven children were to become the most prominent pioneer black family of Edina over several decades and left a legacy of civic involvement. An observer described early Edina as an agricultural village, “where there is a post offi ce, a mill, and a store, and proudly aspires to the dignity of a trading town. Th e numerous farms are well-cultivated, and are occupied by intelligent people who appreciate education, and surround themselves with the accessories of a refi ned society.”A center of the early community was Minnehaha Grange No. 398, organized in 1873. Th e Grange Hall originated in a meeting at the Yancey family home in 1879 with a “considerable number of persons desirous to form an association to build and own a hall building near Edina Mills.” In 1888, the name Edina was voted upon in that building, which also served as the village hall until 1942. When moved for construction of St. Stephen’s Church in 1935, a member of the Yancey family donated the new site. In 1970, the Grange Hall was moved to the present Frank Tupa Park in the GrandView District, later joined by the historic Cahill School.Changes in the district have been ongoing including transportation and services. Members of the Yancey family platted Grand View Heights in 1910 and Tingdale Brother’s Brookside in 1916. In 1913, the Dan Patch Line was cut through the high ground east of Brookside Avenue, providing passenger service to Minneapolis from 1915 to 1942. In 1927, new highway 169/212 (current Vernon Avenue) was cut through the District. Grading and paving businesses such as J. A. Danens and Son located to serve the growth, joined by motels and restaurants. Th e District expanded rapidly with western Edina following World War II. Th e Edina directory of 1953 listed six of ten businesses in the District as including “Grandview” in their names: a cafe, market, two service station, hardware, and seed Sources: 1. R. J. Baldwin, in Isaac Atwater, History of Minneapolis and Hennepin County (Munsell, 1895), p. 1263 as quoted in Paul D. Hesterman, From Settlement to Suburb: Th e History of Edina, Minnesota (Burgess Publishing,1998) Edina Historical Society, p. 29.2. Meeting minutes dated March 7, 1879. Copy in the Edina Historical Society fi les.Historic GrandView Heights Platand garden supply store. In 1947, Jerry Paulsen opened a meat counter in one of the local groceries, a modest beginning to Jerry’s Enterprises, a longtime prominent presence in the District.It is encouraged to look to the history of the District in naming the proposed public amenities and new streets. Th e Yancey family in particular, due to their early ownership of the District and legacy of civic engagement, merits that honor at a prominent location such as the commons. Page 396 of 492 4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsPage 397 of 492 104/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsProject Schedule and ProcessSeptOctNovDecPart IDiscussion and DiscoveryCommunity Workshop #1Part IIIdeas and OptionsCommunity Workshop #2Part IIIDecide and DeliverCommunity Workshop #3DeliverablesProject/Community Meetings SeptOctNovDecSteering CommitteeStaff CoordinationExecutive Team MeetingCommunity WorkshopWork Group MeetingsPlan Commission/CouncilProject Update#1 #2#3Part I: Discussion and DiscoveryPart I is about learning from and listening to the Steering Committee, Work Groups, and other stakeholders; analyzing the study area and understanding the work done to-date; appreciating the larger dynamics of the area; and clearly deﬁ ning the opportunities. An initial Community Workshop is held to conduct work group discussions/downloads, and a public meeting/presentation is hosted by the Steering Committee and the Consulting Team. Part II: Ideas and OptionsPart II focuses on developing ideas and options that address the speciﬁ c issues raised by the Steering Committee, stakeholders, and the public process. The Consulting Team conducts a three-day Community Workshop (to be held in the study area) that will include Steering Committee meetings, focus group meetings, stakeholder interviews, team work sessions, and conclude with a public meeting/presentation.Part III: Decide and DeliverPart III consolidates all the comments, ideas, and options into a preferred direction. This part includes a third Community Workshop and public meeting. The Consulting Team prepares a summary document that may be widely distributed via a variety of sources (i.e., print, web, etc.) and a Sketch-up 3D model of the area with preferred options.Project Schedule: Th e project schedule was organized around three community workshops.Page 398 of 492 11Th e Steering Committee and Executive Committee have worked closely with the Consulting Team to facilitate a process that focused on key issues, opportunities, and recommendations. Th e process worked with the Steering Committee that met on a regular basis to guide the Consulting Team. A sub-committee of Work Groups addressed Land Use/Community Design, Community Needs/Public Realm, Transportation/Infrastructure and Real Estate/Finance. Th ese groups put an incredible amount of eff ort into initial background information and research, defi nition of issues, and discussion about ideas and options. A key component of the project was a series of Community Workshops held in September, October and November, 2011, that hosted a range of community stakeholders either in interviews, focus groups, program meetings and at public meetings.Th e community participation process included these primary groups of participants: Steering Committee, Executive Committee, work groups, City staff , focus groups (land owners, neighborhoods, public offi cials, schooldistrict, institutions, city departments, business operators, and others as identifi ed during the process), Plan Commission members, City Council members and the Mayor.4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsSummary of Participation ProcessThe Public Participation Process: Th e public participation process included Steering Committee meetings, work group meetings, public meetings, focus groups meetings, and program groups meetings throughout the fall of 2011.Page 399 of 492 4/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPage 400 of 492 134/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterConcept DiagramsIntroduction Create “go to” and “stay at” usesConnect throughoutEasy to get to; easy to get aroundPrinciple #2 in the GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan is about “enhanc(ing) the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections.”Th e Guide Plan also suggests that “Th e District serves primarily as a neighborhood (rather than regional) center.” Based on Steering Committee and Public input, this idea has broad appeal. But what do we mean by neighborhood center and how does that fi t with specifi c expectations and outcomes for the GrandView District?“Neighborhood feel,” “pedestrian friendly,” and “safe and connected” describe the desired character for the District. But the basis for these words lies in a clear vision for the key elements, or systems, that defi ne place...and further set the framework for future and ongoing development at GrandView. Th ese elements include Land Use, Transportation and Movement, the Public Realm and Sustainability, and will be described and illustrated in more detail in this chapter.Neighborhood CenterPage 401 of 492 144/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and offi ce buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fi elds, a signifi cant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district.Vernon is assumed to remain more convenience-and service-oriented with improved pedestrian sidewalks/connections, safer street crossings (especially to the adjacent neighborhood), bike lanes, and better organized/managed traffi c fl ow and parking. Both Eden and Vernon are anticipated to employ Complete/Living Street principles that emphasize the place-qualities of streets.Across Highway 100 to the east, the Vernon/50th/Eden alignment culminates with City Hall; long term uses are assumed to accommodate a greater civic/community presence when/if the Highway 100 interchange is reconfi gured as a split-diamond facility.Goals• Develop and improve the district as three smaller “villages” that are connected physically and by a signature character and identity.• Recognize the need for a range of housing types and choices and address those markets that also reinforce the District vision.Land UseLand use in the District is currently focused on convenience retail and service uses that are visible from Vernon Avenue. Th e majority of these uses are auto-oriented and are accessible from Vernon and Gus Young Lane. Th e exception is the GrandView Square development that includes residential, offi ce, and civic uses organized around a central green space. Th e Comprehensive Plan identifi es the GrandView Heights District as a mixed-use center character area, a potential “area of change” and guides future land as a mixed-use center. Th e Comprehensive Plan also says that “the District is in the process of evolving from a somewhat scattered auto-oriented district to a more integrated mixed of uses.”Th e over-arching concept is to support the “go-to” uses (auto-oriented) while anticipating more “stay-at” uses (pedestrian-oriented), and to improve future use and built form around three key civic “centers”: • City Hall• Library• Community Commons (civic building and green space)Th e future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. Th e plan emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/• Emphasize the connection to Minnehaha Creek.• Create a recognized, visible arts identity and provide space/place for greater community arts users and producers.• Address needs of underserved populations (teens, singles, seniors, etc.).• Establish a community commons as a multi-purpose facility for a wide audience (e.g., whole body, whole life, health and wellness) and as a focal point and central gathering place that connects City Hall to the east with the Library to the southwest. • Celebrate the “Birthplace” of Edina, the Mill, and record the oral history of GrandView Heights; tell the stories.• Emphasize a pedestrian-oriented sense of place that produces an appropriate scale and function, and preserves surrounding views. • Support economic growth and community stability by providing accessible and effi cient connections between home, school, work, recreation, and business destinations through improved pedestrian and vehicular environments throughout the area.Page 402 of 492 154/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Land Use PlanVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use CenterOffi ceMedium/High Density ResidentialPage 403 of 492 164/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master PlanExisting BuildingsPotential DevelopmentProposed Civic Community BuildingsPage 404 of 492 174/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Potential Build-OutVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveLibraryHwy 100City HallPage 405 of 492 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking NorthPage 406 of 492 194/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic Works SiteLand UseDevelopment3.6 acres Site28,000 SF Public Green24 units Condominium42 units Apartments50,000 SF Community/Civic16 units TownhousesParking200 spaces Park and Ride200 spaces Community Use158 spaces Multi-familyTh e public works site is located in a central point of the District and is seen as the “commons” for how the District vision will be realized. Uses proposed include the community green space located on top of a parking garage that supports area businesses, civic uses, and serves as a Metro Transit park and ride structure; a community/civic building anchoring the green; and a variety of residential uses including condominiums, apartments, and townhouse building types. Townhouse units are envisioned to front Arcadia as a building type that can incrementally “step-up” the hill, providing a character unique to the District.Public GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesTownhousesArcadia AvePublic Works SitePublic GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesEden AveArcadia AveEden AveA form-based code can guide desired building use and frontage.Page 407 of 492 203. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Land UsePublic Works Site Looking SoutheastGrandView CrossingArcadia AveEden AveHwy 100Page 408 of 492 214/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterProposed North-South SectionProposed East -West SectionLand UsePublic Works SiteGrandView Green Space on top of Parking StructureGrandView Green on top of Parking StructureNew frontage road on west side of Hwy 100ArcadiaOLGHwy 100Rail ROW Existing City RampJerry’sCommunity CenterCondominiumsTownhousesParkingEden AveGrandView CrossingPage 409 of 492 224/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBus Garage SiteLand UseEden Ave5,000 SF Retail42,000 SF Offi ce175 spaces ParkingDue to the elevation change, this site lends itself to supporting a number of commercial and retail uses by adding a small, one level parking structure contiguous to and south of Jerry’s. Th is structure would work with the existing topography to allow better access to the Jerry’s loading area and to provide additional parking to support the grocery and needed parking at grade. Th is site could also accommodate a drive-thru use such as a small community bank, cleaners, or coff ee shop.ParkingRetailOffi ce/RetailOffi ceParkingEden AveJerry’sPage 410 of 492 233. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Bus Garage Site Looking NortheastLand UseEden AveJerry’sPage 411 of 492 244/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1From a land use perspective, a number of immediate steps can be taken to set the stage for new investment in the District. Th ese include: • Policy changes to the Comprehensive Plan (the Small Area Plan is intended to update the Comprehensive Plan).• Potential zoning revisions that could include a form-based code to regulate desired public realm, building frontages, and building height.• Identifi cation of Eden and Vernon as early candidates for application of Living Streets principles.• Policy direction that guides overall sustainability of the District, including consolidated reuse/recycling, stormwater management, etc.• Policy direction that guides how new public and private investment may be supported with a variety of fi nancing tools.Th e public works site (public green space and a community/civic building) and the bus garage site are the two key parcels that can “jump-start” the redevelopment process. In particular, the ability of the public works site to provide a fee simple, unencumbered asset will allow civic/community and private and public realm uses to be realized early, and will demonstrate the leverage identifi ed in the Guiding Principles to support a variety of next steps. Th is could include a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide a parking structure that would also serve as the GrandView Commons (community/civic building/public green).In similar fashion, the bus garage can be a major pivot point for how a number of land use decisions may play out and will act as a land use “connector” along Eden. Th is site may need to be readied for development sooner than the public works site in order to accommodate a series of land use transitions that will help the larger District vision implementation. A third component of an early phase would be the development of the Wanner site currently owned by Our Lady of Grace as potential residential, offi ce, or retail uses.In support of these anticipated land use changes, new street confi gurations/alignments, circulation patterns, and streetscape/pedestrian improvements along Eden will complete a bike and pedestrian network and support the anticipated land use changes with improved automobile circulation and management.12637451. Public Works2. School Bus Garage3. New Bridge/Street4. Wanner Site5. Jerry’s Site6. Jerry’s Site7. City Ramp AccessPage 412 of 492 254/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1Hwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1 DiagramA. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic building• Arcadia steps• Community/Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail/service/offi ce useACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWanner/OLG PropertyTh e following chapter on Implementation is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or Phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site, and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time. See Appendix.C. Wanner Site• Townhouses fronting OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatmentPage 413 of 492 264/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmPublic realm refers to all land and area under the ownership of the city. Th is includes city streets and rights-of-way (ROW), parks and open space, and parcels of land or other assets that are used to provide individual and collective benefi t and amenity to all residents and the general public. Th e greater value and power of the public realm is its ability to connect neighborhoods, businesses, schools, and parks and open space into a larger whole greater than the sum of the individual elements. Streets and ROW make up a major (and connected) portion of the public realm and represent a signifi cant opportunity to enhance and connect the community. It is critical to view streets, then, not as just conveyors for automobiles but also as multi-modal facilities that provide democratic accessibility for all and as form-givers and green space that increase the livability of the community. Th e result should be a greater sense of green throughout the District.Goals• Acknowledge “no net loss,” yet aggressively seek new public space.• Improve the bike and pedestrian environment: make it safe and friendly, and include adequate parking area for bikes.• Create a community/civic building connected to GrandView Green (an outdoor public green space) that connects east and west and serves as an indoor/outdoor gathering space.• Create a prominent public realm of connected parks, green space, paths, plazas, and private open space – a legible green framework as the primary form giver.• Provide views within the District and maintain important viewsheds (such as the “grand view”) for public use.• Plan for a safe, comfortable pedestrian environment that links public and private destinations north-south (neighborhoods, library, businesses) and east-west (neighborhoods, businesses, commons, City Hall).Images (top to bottom): Osaka, Japan; Montreal, Canada; and New York, New York.Page 414 of 492 274/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmA. GrandView CommonsB. GrandView StepsC. GrandView CrossingD. Arcadia StreetscapeE. Gus Young StreetscapeF. Arcade ConnectionG. Vernon StreetscapeH. Eden StreetscapeABCDFHHGEVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St51st StPublic Realm / Open Space DiagramPage 415 of 492 284/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons For GrandView, the public works site provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. Beyond that, an even greater opportunity exists then to continuously link the businesses and destinations within the District to the surrounding neighborhoods and the city in general. Th is can begin immediately by simply investing in a safe and connected public sidewalk network, increment by increment. Th e larger vision of the public realm includes a community/civic building and GrandView Green, a connected network of public parks, public and private plazas, a new street (GrandView Crossing), sidewalk and streetscape improvements, and bike and pedestrian facilities. Th is should include bridge enhancements on Eden over Highway 100, a pedestrian and bike bridge connecting the Commons with City Hall, and the potential to connect Eden and Brookside with local a bike path within the Canada Pacifi c Rail ROW.Montreal public green: Th is public green suggests the appropriate scale and character of GrandView Green.Page 416 of 492 294/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons: GrandView Commons includes GrandView Crossing, GrandView Green, and a new community/civic building.Social InteractionExercise and FitnessClassroomTeen ActivityBanquet and ReceptionHistory / InterpretivePerforming and Visual ArtsMeetingsFood Prep / Community Oven Retail / IncubatorGrandView CrossingPedestrian BridgeGrandView GreenCivic BuildingArcadia AveHwy 100GrandView Community Commons DiagramWhat / Who Populates the Commons?Page 417 of 492 304/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmVernon , Eden, Sherwood, LibraryEden AveEden AveLibraryTh e plan here is to focus on improving pedestrian connections between the Library/Senior Center and Jerry’s, via a more street-like character that extends north from GrandView Square Street, including a well-defi ned pedestrian crossing at Eden. Sherwood is shown as a conversion for additional parking and may still allow movement through the area, though at a very reduced rate of speed. Th is conversion allows a small green space to connect the Library to Vernon.1. Conversion of Eden Avenue would provide 50 additional parking spaces.2. A small green space connects the Library to Vernon giving the civic building an “address” on Vernon.3. Pedestrian crossings are created or enhanced to provide safe and visible locations (51st, 52nd, and 53rd Streets) on Vernon and to the west of the bus garage site on Link to cross the street.4. Th e GrandView Square area is connected to Jerry’s and beyond through the use of a streetscape that provides a well-defi ned pedestrian system as well as a more organized parking and circulation pattern.5. Any additional street and block improvements (including curb cuts and /or traffi c signals) should be considered after improvements have been made to Vernon and appropriate traffi c and parking studies have been completed (also refer to potential alternatives in the appendix)1123334Vernon AveGrandView SquareSherwoodBrookside52nd St53rd St5LinkPage 418 of 492 314/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmEden AveLibraryGrandView SquareVernon AveLibrary Site Looking EastPage 419 of 492 324/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterArcadia AveVernon AveGus Young LnJerry’sGrandView CrossingPublic RealmVernon, Gus Young, Interlachen Interl ac h e n Th e plan recommends a number of street and traffi c improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffi c, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians. Th is is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing) and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor) that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern. Anchoring the public realm is the GrandView Green, an approximately one-half + acre public space located on the north end of the public works site.1. New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing).2. GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area.3. Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair.4. Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed.5. Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon.6. Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements.7. Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100.8. Public steps of Arcadia.1233455678SummitCommunity / Civic BuildingCity Parking RampPage 420 of 492 334/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterCity HallPublic RealmVernon AveEden AveCity HallHwy 100Sunnyslope RdDale DrWith the future addition of the split-diamond interchange for Highway 100, the east side could see some signifi cant changes with the public realm, land use, and improved pedestrian/bike environments.1. Frontage road associated with the split-diamond interchange.2. Excess land from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) could be used for underground parking (with a green roof deck) and future community/civic use.3. Strategy would provide an improved/expanded Frank Tupa Park and setting for the historic Cahill School and Grange Hall.4. Grange Road alignment is “rationalized” to provide a more effi cient parking layout and allow for a small civic green (5) in front of City Hall.5. Pedestrian/bike bridge connects to west side of Highway 100.6. Eden is shown as a “parking” street to provide additional supply for City Hall.2456314Page 421 of 492 344/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationTh e GrandView area street and movement network is primarily composed of Vernon/50th Street (reliever/augmenter arterial), Eden (local street, state-aid facility) and the multiple ingress/egress ramp system of Highway 100 (designated a principal arterial). Th ere are other local streets, but most provide limited service (such as Summit Avenue) or access that dead ends (such as Brookside off Eden). Th e highway interchange has several on and off ramps that, according to MnDOT, are redundant and/or unsafe. Vernon is a county facility that, south of Interlachen, has seen a reduction of average daily traffi c over the past 10 years. Eden provides a secondary connection within the District east and west over Highway 100. Eden is designated the primary bike route through the District; Vernon and Interlachen are designated as secondary routes.Th ere are two major recommendations that support the overall movement and transportation goals of the plan. First, the Framework proposes that the Highway 100 interchange be reconfi gured into a split-diamond interchange to better manage through-traffi c and to provide improved local access/circulation via frontage roads east and west of the highway. Over time, this would provide a more connected local system (i.e., more local streets) with direct access to Highway 100 via the frontage roads. Second, the Framework proposes a new east-west street along the north half of the public works site (spanning the CP Rail corridor) connecting to Arcadia from Vernon, that would be paired with Gus Young Lane to provide a one-way circulation pattern. It would operate as one-way in (eastbound) from Vernon on the new GrandView Crossing, and one-way out (westbound) to Vernon/Interlachen on Gus Young Lane. Th is pattern would eliminate the left hand turn from Vernon (southbound) to Gus Young Lane.Bike improvements would focus on more lane area and identifi cation along Vernon and Eden, consistent with Living and Complete Streets principles. Over the long term, east-west bike and pedestrian access would be improved by adding a new bridge over Highway 100 that would connect the GrandView Commons to Tupa Park, City Hall, and the Minnehaha Creek mill area. In addition to more bike parking facilities in the District, the plan recommends an off -road option within the District: an at-grade bike path alongside the CP Rail ROW from Eden connecting to Brookside.Functional Class • Highway 100: Principal Arterial.• 50th Street: A Minor Augmenter.• Vernon Avenue: B Minor Connector.• Interlachen Boulevard: Major Collector.• Eden Avenue: Local Street.Traffi c Volume• 13,000-23,000 AADT along West 50th Street/Vernon Avenue.• 4000-8000 AADT along Eden Avenue.Goals • Support a more effi cient, compact, and safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon and Eden.• Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles to Vernon, Eden, and the local street network.• Create an improved circulation and access network between public streets/parcels and private development/destinations.• Create an enhanced parking environment that, in part, depends on shared, centrally-located District parking supplies.• Partner with Metro Transit to implement a community-scale Park and Ride and bus turnaround loop in the area.• Complete the historical transition of Vernon from old Highway 169 to a local District street.• Identify and implement a demonstration project for “Complete/Living” streets principles.• Provide additional auto, bike, and pedestrian connections east and west in the District.• Maintain and improve parking, access, and circulation in the short term for convenience, retail, and service uses.• Complete the pedestrian and bike system. Make bikes and pedestrians a priority and allow for a safe crossing over Highway 100.• Take a leadership role related to the Highway 100 interchange. Build the “reason platform” for multi-modal access and gateways.• Preserve the CP Rail corridor for future, possible public transit, and non-motorized movement/connection in the District.• Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network.Page 422 of 492 354/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterComplete/Living Streets improvementsPrivate streetscapesSplit diamond interchangeNew / improved bridgesTransportationVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100District Street FrameworkTh e movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” confi guration. Th is approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. Th e existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffi c would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term, there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffi c access and circulation in the upper core of the District. Page 423 of 492 364/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationDistrict Street FrameworkExistingProposedPage 424 of 492 374/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking WestVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Page 425 of 492 384/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationParking• Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/practical.• Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district.• Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply.Parking beneath buildingsNew access to existingSurface lotsExisting rampDirection of traffi cVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100PPPage 426 of 492 394/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationPark and Ride OptionsABCLocationSpaces NotesA Use existing ramp244 Access issuesC New ramp in “cloverleaf”n/a Long termB New ramp on public works site200 Fee simple587 Express RouteExisting bus stopsVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Metro Transit operates the #587 Express route through the GrandView District before turning north on Highway 100 to downtown. Th ey have a well documented market that they serve in southwest Edina, and board riders on a daily basis who are parking in front of the library, in the city ramp, and in front of a number of businesses. Th ey are highly motivated to locate a “community” scale park and ride facility that would accommodate no more than 200 cars. At least two sites have the potential to serve this need: the existing city ramp and a potential structure on the public works site. Th e existing city ramp is currently undergoing a construction project (new water treatment plant on the ground fl oor) and according to the city, this would make adding additional levels problematic. Access will also be an issue as well when the new GrandView Crossing is built. Th e city does think additional parking could be located over Brookside behind and east of Jerry’s.Under the right conditions and with some minor improvements, the public works site could be converted into a park and ride lot tomorrow. Th is would be an interim solution (a similar scenario involving the site as an interim use for the Edina bus garage could also be considered). Th e advantage of locating a park and ride on the public works site is that it is a fee simple site that could be used with little change to existing conditions. In general, a park and ride could provide a surplus of parking during nights and weekends, and serve overfl ow parking in the District as well.Page 427 of 492 404/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationVernon Avenue Right-SizingSouth of the Interlachen intersection, Vernon Avenue would be reconfi gured into a three lane, divided section that would better accommodate local traffi c movement, provide a dedicated bike lane, and capture some of the ROW for pedestrian improvements and street crossings.sidewalk8’sidewalk8’boulevard6’boulevard6’bike lane6’bike lane6’drive lane12’medianvariesdrive lane12’Proposed Section for Vernon AvenueExisting Section for Vernon Avenuedrive lanedrive lane12’12’drive lanedrive lane12’12’Vernon Avenue Looking South: A new three lane section would allow additional space for bikes and pedestrians, and provide controlled left turn lanes.Page 428 of 492 414/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 ImprovementsTransportationShort Term ImprovementsLong Term ImprovementsNew rampsEliminated rampsSignalA major proposal involves the short term and long term confi guration of the Highway 100 interchange. Th e plan proposes a “split-diamond” arrangement that would manage access on and off the highway at signalized intersections. Th ese intersections would be at Vernon and Eden, and would connect with parallel, one-way frontage roads. Th is confi guration would allow regional traffi c to clearly and safely access the highway and still move into the District with predictability and safety. Long term prospects might include the transfer of unused MnDOT ROW for local and community uses such as civic building sites, future bus rapid transit support, parking, and open space.Page 429 of 492 424/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBicycle ImprovementsTransportationPrimary bike routesSecondary bike routesTrail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of-way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District.Page 430 of 492 434/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationBicycle ImprovementsEden AvenueVernon between Eden and Interlachen Vernon south of EdenExistingExisting ExistingProposedProposed ProposedPrecedentPrecedentPage 431 of 492 444/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityOne dictionary defi nes sustainability as:• Th e ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confi rmed. • Th e quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long term ecological balance.For GrandView, sustainability is about how the natural and manmade environments coexist in a way that limits and/or prohibits harmful impact on the environment now and for generations to come. But it also has meaning for how the community and businesses will be sustained, supported, and upheld. One is not isolated or independent from the other; a comprehensive, long term defi nition of sustainability should guide how the District and the community move forward with goals, recommendations, and actions.Recent Activities Sustainability is a broad and deep subject that is constantly being refi ned from principles and policies to products and practices to fi nancing and implementation—perhaps so much so that it may seem diffi cult to determine where to begin and what next steps should be taken. For GrandView, it seems practical to review some of the recent decisions and actions the city has taken that will provide a foundation for how the District will grow, change, and redevelop.• Edina Energy & Environment Commission: Solar/wind ordinance amendments task force. City staff is reviewing proposed ordinance. • PACE Financing: Th e Edina City Council unanimously adopted the Edina Emerald Energy Program November 15, 2011, making it the fi rst Minnesota city to take advantage of Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) legislation. PACE, which was approved by the state Legislature in 2010, allows property owners to have the cost of energy effi ciency and conservation improvements assessed to their property and paid alongside property taxes. GrandView Tire & Auto, 5415 70th Street West, used the tool for the necessary fi nancing to install a 27-kilowatt solar panel system on the already green auto shop’s roof.• New Public Works Facility: Th e public works building was built with sustainability in mind. It has geothermal heating and cooling and used recycled materials, and its landscape was designed to minimize the development’s impact on the environment. A rain garden at the corner of 74th and Metro Boulevard holds and infi ltrates water from sloping parking lots with curb cuts to direct the water to native grasses and plants.• City Hall: Installation of solar panel project in Fall of 2011.• City Council Living Streets policy: Recommendation of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) to establish a comprehensive Living Streets Policy that integrated all modes of transportation and addressed issues such as traffi c calming, stormwater management, promoting active living, community feel, improving walking and biking, and enhancing urban forests. If approved by the Council, the ETC would work in collaboration with staff to prepare the policy for the Council’s future consideration. Mr. Sullivan reported a $15,000 grant was available to initiate the creation of this policy, which may cost $60,000-$100,000 to complete. • Adoption of MinesotaGreenStep Cities program, 2011: On January 18, 2011, Edina passed a council resolution to become a member of the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. Minnesota GreenStep Cities is a voluntary challenge, assistance, and recognition program to help cities achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices. Each best practice can be implemented by completing one or more specifi c actions from a list of four to eight actions. Th ese actions are tailored to all Minnesota cities, focus on cost savings and energy use reduction, and encourage innovation.Page 432 of 492 454/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityGreenstep’s 28 Best PracticesBuildings and Lighting1. Effi cient Existing Public Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.2. Effi cient Existing Private Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.3. New Green Buildings: Construct new buildings to meet or qualify for a green building standard.4. Effi cient Building & Street Lighting and Signals: Improve the effi ciency of public and private lighting and signals.5. Building Reuse: Create economic and regulatory incentives for redeveloping and repurposing existing buildings before building new.Land Use6. Comprehensive Plan and Implementation: Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it.7. Effi cient City Growth: Promote fi nancial and environmental sustainability by enabling and encouraging higher density housing and commercial land use.8. Mixed Uses: Develop effi cient and healthy land patterns.9. Effi cient Highway-Oriented Development:Adopt commercial development and design standards for highway road corridors.10. Conservation Design: Adopt development ordinances or processes that protect natural systems.Transportation11. Complete Green Streets: Create a network of multi-modal green streets.12. Mobility Options: Promote active living and alternatives to single-occupancy car travel.13. Effi cient City Fleets: Implement a city fl eet investment, operations, and maintenance plan.14. Demand-Side Travel Planning: Implement Travel Demand Management and Transit-Oriented Design.Environmental Management15. Purchasing: Adopt environmentally preferable purchasing policies and practices.16. Urban Forests: Increase city tree and plant cover.17. Ecologic Stormwater Management: Minimize the volume of and pollutants in rainwater runoff .18. Parks and Trails: Enhance the city’s green infrastructure.19. Surface Water Quality: Improve local water bodies.20. Effi cient Water and Wastewater Facilities: Assess and improve drinking water and wastewater facilities.21. Septic Systems: Implement an eff ective management program for decentralized wastewater treatment systems.22. Solid Waste Reduction: Increase waste reduction, reuse and recycling.23. Local Air Quality: Prevent generation of local air contaminants.Economic and Community Development24. Benchmarks & Community Engagement: Adopt outcome measures for GreenStep and other city sustainability eff orts, and engage community members in ongoing education, dialogue, and campaigns.25. Green Business Development: Document the use of assistance programs for green business and job development.26. Renewable Energy: Remove barriers to and encourage installation of renewable energy generation capacity.27. Local Food: Strengthen local food and fi ber production and access.28. Business Synergies: Network/cluster businesses to achieve better energy, economic, and environmental outcomes.Page 433 of 492 464/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Goals• Take a position on sustainability; be a model for city wide sustainability.• Defi ne incentives to attract “Best-in-Class” development that deliver highest levels of sustainable design.• Take advantage of “free” resources: wind, rain, and sun.• Reduce heat island eff ect and create a pedestrian environment that is pleasant, shaded, and visually interesting.• Address stormwater runoff in all phases and facets of the District.• Build on existing infrastructure.• Take advantage of available partnerships/funding.• Create District (not separate site) solutions.• Apply GreenStep Best Practices.RecommendationsA number of recommendations should be considered for the District and emerge from what is being done by the City Council, Energy & Environment Commission, Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, other boards/commissions, and various stakeholders. Th e GreenStep Cities best practices are an obvious start to how these apply to the District. Beyond that, it will be important to defi ne the District in an organizational manner so that roles and responsibilities can be defi ned and actions coordinated. A good example would be how a District committee on sustainability could begin to defi ne the “GrandView Works”—a sustainable practices approach for how water, waste, and energy are addressed from a District point of view.For GrandView, there are three levels of approach and opportunity that build from what is being done today in the District (in some cases by individual businesses or owners) and lay the groundwork for a sustainable strategy:1. Work from existing strengths and build the foundation• Respond to existing plans, policies, and best practices already in place (local, county, and regional policies).• Educate District stakeholders about best practices, case studies, etc.• Establish a general communications structure and forum for what is being done.• Consider new policy to focus on redevelopment areas like GrandView with sustainability guidelines.• Stormwater management policy at the District level (works with both watersheds).• Pilot project(s) for solar light installation (pedestrian and parking areas).2. District Systems• Stormwater strategy under parking collection/storage/treatment/reuse.• Recycle/reuse building materials (after demolition).• Grey water use.• Trash collection and recycling within the District beyond what is currently required by the city.• Consolidated organic recycling focused on restaurants in the area.• Generate alternative power for specifi c uses/needs.• Green and white roofs.3. Closed Loops• Recycled stormwater into drinking water supply.• Recycled grey water into drinking water supply.• Off -the-grid.• Green buildings—zero carbon.Page 434 of 492 474/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Page 435 of 492 4/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposePage 436 of 492 494/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Strategy1. Adopt the framework as a part of the Comprehensive Plan.As a policy document, the Comprehensive Plan off ers the ability to guide future development in the GrandView District even in the absence of more defi nitive plans. Once adopted, the framework provides signifi cant context for determining further directions and actions in the GrandView District.2. Establish an Implementation Steering Committee using citizen volunteers to guide the eff ort, including providing direction for key remaining areas of the framework, with working groups as needed to support the work of the Implementation Steering Committee.An over-riding objective of the GrandView District planning process is to utilize local citizens as experts in defi ning directions for an area identifi ed in the Comprehensive Plan as a location where the potential for change exists. With signifi cant investment of time, talent, and energy, in addition to the local knowledge that has been developed through the Small Area Guide process and the Small Area Plan process, it is logical that the process of planning using local citizens to guide the process should continue. Th e process to be pursued should, as in past eff orts leading to the framework, be defi ned by the citizen volunteers.5. Set a plan for the evolution of the District.Th e planning process was established with the understanding that the GrandView District would redevelop incrementally in concert with a vision defi ned by the community. A key aspect of the plan, and one that can be best defi ned once several of the decision points in Step 4 (above) have been advanced, is to determine a logical, sustainable, and reasonably defi nitive plan for its evolution.6. Provide regular updates to the City Council.A Steering Committee charged with guiding the further development of a plan for the GrandView District cannot act independently of other actions of the city, just as the area itself cannot evolve independent of the rest of the Edina community. With regular updates, the evolving plan can be assured that it aligns with other policies of the city.3. Evaluate the GrandView District small area planning process as a means of engaging citizens in local planning.As indicated in the Comprehensive Plan, several areas of potential change remain in the community. An objective review of the GrandView process will allow the city to determine whether it should be replicated, modifi ed, or abandoned as a local planning tool. 4. Initiate a process led by the Implementation Steering Committee to provide direction for key remaining areas of the framework.Remaining key decision points, many of which are interrelated but all of which must be defi ned in terms of the approved framework, include:• Transportation elements• Density and height• Housing aff ordability• Financing• Design and development guidelines• Community BuildingPage 437 of 492 504/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1-5 years5-10 years10+ yearsVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Generalized Phasing PlanA generalized phasing plan is shown that organizes phasing into three simplifi ed increments with the understanding that a variety of conditions will infl uence actual investment and implementation.1. Policy and RegulationTh is Framework recommends (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan) that the District evolve from a Community Commercial Node (pg. 4-31 Comprehensive Plan) into a mixed-use center. However, the Plan also suggests a vision that may not be completely consistent with current zoning including how use, built form, and parking may be regulated. Concurrent with other implementation activities, zoning revisions, including the potential use of a form-based code and design guidelines will be addressed by the Implementation Steering Committee after approval of the Framework by the City Council. 2. Phasing, Development & FinanceTh e following graphic begins the discussion about how to best arrange and prioritize the public land parcels (public works site and school bus garage site) so that new investment and redevelopment can occur in a timely manner and in response to market and community forces. Central in this discussion is the school bus garage site which, when a new garage site can be found, can include new commercial/offi ce uses, replacement of existing uses, expansion of businesses in the district currently in need of more space (such as the municipal liquor store), and parking. Th is could help set the stage for how next steps could be accomplished including initial investment on the public works site, parking and circulation enhancements/additions, and Eden Avenue improvements. In addition, a community building / public green programming group should work during this phase to determine appropriate program and uses. Page 438 of 492 514/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Immediate < 1 year1 Development Framework approval2 Policy for implementation/fi nance3 Create Implementation Committee4. Implementation Committee should address programming of community / civic building5 Create sustainability guide from GreenStep6 TIF District7A Design Guidelines7 Form-based code for mixed use center8 Green building standards required for district9 Prepare Phase 1 Master Plan10 Address Lifecycle and aff ordable housing1-5 YearsLand Use11 Bus Garage site redevelopment12 Townhouse units on public works site13 Residential on Warner site/OLG14 Community / Civic buildingPublic Realm15 GrandView Green over parking structure16 Arcadia Steps/and streetscape17 CP Rail bike path from Eden to Brookside18 Add tree lined streetscape and monument signs into Richmond Hills neighborhoodTransportation/Infrastructure19 Park n ride structure/green roof@public works site20 Additional parking south of Jerry’s21 GrandView Crossing bridge & street22 Eden Living Streets/streetscape /3 lane section23 Eden Living Streets/Arcadia/Normandale24 New access from Eden to city ramp parking25 Jerry’s parking Streetscape26 Implement one-way pairs/remove left to G. Young27 Reservation on public works site for rail transit use Sustainability28 GrandView Works/Organics recycling center 29 Stormwater reuse & management policy30 Solar pilot project for public lightingMajor RecommendationsPage 439 of 492 524/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation5-10 YearsLand Use31 Arcadia site redevelopment/include pocket park32 Apt/condo units on public works site33 Residential on Warner site/OLG/Phase 2Public Realm34 Small civic green at City Hall35 Arcadia streetscape improvementsTransportation/Infrastructure36 Vernon Living Streets/streetscape/3 lane section37 Dedicate right turn from Vernon to Interlachen38 Reconfi gure Eden as parking street@City Hall39 Eden bridge pedestrian/bike enhancements40 Vernon as primary bike route to GrandView Crossing41 Consider ‘turn-back’ of Vernon from County42 Complete Streets: Library green space fronting Vernon 43 Reconfi gure Eden as parking streetSustainability44 Stormwater collection/treatment system45 Grey water reuse/irrigation, etc.46 GrandView Works/geothermal at OLG fi elds10+ YearsLand Use47 East frontage road site redevelopment48 Civic development on excess MNDOT landPublic Realm49 Hwy 100 pedestrian/bike bridge50 Green roof/space over underground parking51 Add green space to Tupa Park52 Include gateway walls/landscape w/interchangeTransportation/Infrastructure53 Hwy 110 split diamond interchange54 Realignment of Grange Rd/Eden55 Add Gus Young extension to frontage roadSustainability56 Closed loop water supply system57 GrandView Works/Alternative energy sourcesMajor RecommendationsPage 440 of 492 534/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1DC - Downtown Core StandardsSide(2) Siting(3) Heightat the front of the lot: a minimum of 75% of build-ing facade shall be placed within 5 feet of the front lot line. This requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street or sidewalk 5’see Height Overlay District for minimum and maximum heights and upper storey stepbacksat the rear of the lot: 10’ setback required for load-ing areas, none if adjacent to street or alley.parking setback line30’at the side of the lot: none required. One side of build-inmg must be placed at the side lot line. Also refer to Neighborhood Compatibility requirements 10’commerceresidentialfi nished fl oor height: avg 3 feet above sidewalkfi nished fl oor height: maximum 18 inches above sidewalkA. Building Height i. Th e buildings shall be at least 2 storeys in height but no greater than the heights as designated on map____. Upper storey step backs are also designated on map____.B. Ground Storey Height: Commerce Uses i. Th e average ground storey fl oor elevation within 30 feet of the front property line shall be 1.Not lower than the front sidewalk elevation. 2.Not higher than 18 inches above the sidewalk. ii. Th e ground storey shall have at least 15 feet of clear interior height contiguous to the front property line for a minimum depth of 25 feet. iii. Th e maximum ground storey height is 22 feet, measured from the sidewalk to the second storey fl oor. C. Ground Storey Height (residential uses) i. Th e average fi nished fl oor elevation shall be no less than 3 feet above the sidewalk at the front property line ii. Th e ground storey shall have an interior clear height of at least 9 feet and a maximum sidewalk to second storey fl oor height of 22 feet. d. Upper storey height i. Th e maximum clear height (fl oor to ceiling) for upper storeys is 12 feet. ii. At least 80% of each upper storey shall have an interior clear height (fl oor to ceiling) of at least 9 feet. A. Façadei. On each lot the building façade shall be built to within 5 feet of the front property line for at least 75% of it’s length. Th is requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street and public sidewalk. ii. Within 10 feet of a block corner, the ground storey façade may be pulled away to form a corner entry. B. Usable Open Spacei. A minimum of 40 square feet per residential unit shall be pro-vided. Th is space may be shared among units, or may take the form of balconies, roof decks, usable portions of green roofs or other above ground amenities. ii. Open space created infront of the building shall be designed as semi-public space, used as a forecourt, outdoor seating or other semi-public uses. C. Garage and Parkingi. Parking garage openings visible from the sidewalk shall have a clear maximum height of 16 feet and a maximum width of 22 feet. ii. Parking shall be located behind the parking setback lineMin 9ftMax 12ft clear (typ) max 22 ft (typ) (typ) (typ) PropertiesMinimum HeightMaximum HeightPublic realm / Private realmResultA form based approach is organized to code development that defi nes the public realm.Example of form-based code standards for a downtown setting.Page 441 of 492 544/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Financial FeasibilityFeasibility of fi nancing would include: (1) projections of anticipated costs associated with an initial Phase 1 plan and (2) options for revenues to pay those costs. Th is includes items such as street improvements, streetscape improvements, parking infrastructure, property acquisition (i.e., the bus garage), and community space (both potential “commons” or “public realm” space and “programming” or “community/civic center” space). At this point six potential pools or “buckets” of revenue have been identifi ed:1. TIF, Abatement, and other statutory economic development tools;2. Special Assessments;3. Enhanced Property Tax revenues generated by private property development;4. Other Public Sources of funds;5. Non-Profi t or Philanthropic Fundraising; and6. City Tax Revenues.1. TIF, Abatement, and Other Statutory Economic Development Tools.Access some portion of existing TIF Funds; there may be an opportunity to use existing TIF funds. Determine the circumstances under which that is possible and the consequences of doing so.Create a new TIF district. TIF and Abatement tools provide opportunities to “capture” increased value and use it to fi nance some parts of redevelopment. Determine a sense of the potential numbers associated with these options and any limits on how the funds generated by these mechanisms can be spent.2. Special Assessments and Related Tools. Th e City may assess properties that “benefi t” from public improvements for the costs of these improvements up to the value of the benefi t conferred by the improvements. Determine what types of costs are eligible to be recovered using this tool and on related tools that permit the creation of special districts to spread the ongoing costs of maintenance or other improvements. Th e 50th and France area may provide a model for this. 3. Enhanced Property Tax Revenues Generated by Private Development. Th is idea overlaps to a certain extent with #1 above (to the extent the enhanced value will be “captured” via TIF or Abatement). Obviously, the greatest increase of this type would be new development on parcels (like the Public Works and School Bus Garage sites). And consider the prospect of enhanced value emanating from redevelopment of sites (e.g., CSM, Eden 100, etc.) that are already on the tax rolls; having some models of what is reasonable to expect in this category is important.4. Other Public Sources of Funds. Consider the potential partnerships with other public entities that might be able to help with funding. Th e planning activities in this phase of the process have been funded by the Met Council; there might be a prospect of additional funds as planning and implementation move forward. Met Council representatives have also been clear in expressing interest in park and ride facilities. In addition to the Met Council, there are prospects for partnership with MnDOT (related to Highway 100) and Hennepin County (related to Vernon Avenue). To the extent that housing is a part of future redevelopment, there may be Regional, State, and/or Federal funds available to support those eff orts. Th ese any other prospective sources of “Other Public Funds” should be summarized and estimated. 5. Non-Profi t and Philanthropic Fundraising.Consider that private contributions could help with funding. Th ese potential sources of revenue fall into two categories: (1) funds from existing non-profi t organizations interested in supporting particular development initiatives (e.g., housing, arts, etc.) and (2) fundraising campaigns created specifi cally for this eff ort. Determine what is reasonable to expect from each “bucket” and be able to determine whether the “gap” remaining after all other “buckets” are utilized can be fi lled by some kind of capital campaign.6. City Tax Revenues. Th e other way to fi ll any remaining gap is with City tax revenues. Obviously, this is a decision for the City Council to make. It will be important to identify the size of the gap (if any) that will likely need to be fi lled by such funding. Page 442 of 492 554/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementationPossible Staging Questions1. Interim use. Designation of City parking ramp for park and ride?2. Disposition of School Bus Garage Site. Can City negotiate control? If so, when and what are the next steps? RFI? RFP? Negotiate existing user in the District to acquire and invest. 3. How can public works site be best utilized in the interim? As temporary (2-3 year) school bus garage operations? As surface park and ride until structure is built? RFI? RFP? Interim use could allow time for community building use/need to be determined. 4. How to leverage adjacent parcels with timing of bus garage site redevelopment?5. What is timing/feasibility of west side frontage road/southbound ramp confi guration? How to advance that agenda in the short term (1-5 years).6. Eden could / should be programmed for Living Streets improvements consistent with initial phases of development. 7. Feasibility of timing of street, bridge, and deck improvements. 24617365Vernon AveEden AveHwy 100Page 443 of 492 4/05/125. AppendixPage 444 of 492 574/05/125. AppendixImplementationHwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1ACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWagner / OLG PropertyTh e following Implementation section is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time.Phase 1A. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic Building• Arcadia Steps• Community Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail / service offi ce use• Possible drive - thru useC. Warner Site• Townhouses fronting the OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatmentPage 445 of 492 584/05/125. AppendixImplementation GrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲBusGarageSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sfNonͲresidentialcommercial 5,000 950,000.00$190.00$office 42,000 7,980,000.00$190.00$rampparking75 937,500.00$12,500.00$surfaceparking75 112,500.00$1,500.00$47,000150 9,980,000.00$Page 446 of 492 594/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲPublicWorksSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostResidentialtownhouse16 46 8,832,000.00$160 1200 192000smallhouse0150 1200 180000apartment42 64 6,426,000.00$170 900 153000condo24 48 5,472,000.00$190 1200 228000Total82 158 20,730,000.00$NonͲresidentialcommercial150office150community 50,00010,000,000.00$200parking200 3,500,000.00$17,500parknride200 3,500,000.00$17,500Total400 17,000,000.00$Page 447 of 492 604/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲInfrastructureandStreetsLF Ac PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostInfrastructureVernon(*)950332,500.00$350crosswalk525,000.00$5000roadway1,500,000.00$EdenWest(*)385134,750.00$350EdenEast20070,000.00$350crosswalk315,000.00$5000roadway1,500,000.00$Jerrysstreet875306,250$350$GusYoungext(*)15052,500$350$OLGroad15052,500.00$350Bridges(EST)eachGͲViewCrossing750,000.00$estCPRail750,000.00$estsubtotal5,488,500.00$HWY100Splitdiamond(est)$10,000,000Ped/Bike(est)1,500,000.00$(*)ͲDoesnotincludebudgetsforroadwayimprovements/updgrades/reconstructionͲbudgetsareforlandscape/streetscapeonlyPage 448 of 492 614/05/125. AppendixVernon and InterchangeTransportationPage 449 of 492 624/05/125. AppendixVernonTransportationPage 450 of 492 634/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit DiamondPage 451 of 492 644/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit DiamondPage 452 of 492 654/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesLibrary / Eden / LinkProposed Illustrative Plan (p.16)Alternative 1Alternative 2Alternative 3: Streetscape improvementsPage 453 of 492 664/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesArcadia and Gus YoungProposed Illustrative Plan (p. 16)Alternative 1Alternative 2Page 454 of 492 EdinaMN.gov Preliminary Rezoning, Site Plan and Plat 5100 Eden Avenue Page 455 of 492 Site Page 456 of 492 Page 457 of 492 SitePage 458 of 492 Page 459 of 492 Land Use Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed -use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential Page 460 of 492 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 27 4/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape Page 461 of 492 Site Page 462 of 492 Page 463 of 492 Page 464 of 492 Page 465 of 492 Page 466 of 492 Page 467 of 492 Page 468 of 492 Page 469 of 492 Page 470 of 492 Page 471 of 492 Page 472 of 492 This Request Requires: 1.Rezoning from Planned Office District 1 to Planned Commercial District 2. 2.Subdivision approval of a new plat to consolidate seven parcels into one. 3.Site Plan approval. 4.A variance for the following building setbacks: a.West (Arcadia): 21 feet where 35 feet is required b.North: 4 feet where 25 feet is required c.East: 11 feet where 25 feet is required d.South: 2 feet where 25 feet is required 5.A variance to allow FAR at 2 where 1.5 is permitted. 6.A variance to allow building height at 81 feet where up to 48 feet is permitted. 7.A variance from the requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm. 8.A variance from the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment. Page 473 of 492 Page 474 of 492 Page 475 of 492 21’ Required Building Setback 4’ Page 476 of 492 Primary Issues ·Is the proposed rezoning of the site from POD-1 to PCD-2, Planned Commercial District 2 reasonable? ·Are the proposed Variances justified? Page 477 of 492 Primary Issue ·Is the proposed rezoning of the site from POD-1 to PCD-2, Planned Commercial District 2 reasonable? Yes. Staff supports the proposed rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided Mixed Use Center in the Comprehensive Plan, which lists retail, office, service, multifamily, and institutional uses as primary uses. The PCD- 2 district allows all these uses. The project would advance Comprehensive Plan goals, specifically to create a vibrant and pedestrian oriented mixed-use district in the Grandview area. As outlined on pages 9-10 of the report, the proposal meets the criteria for rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, would not be detrimental to surrounding property, would benefit the commercial area with more employees in the area, and would be supported by existing roadways. (Stantec Traffic & Parking Study) The mass of the building compared to the previously approved residential project for the site would be less. The floor area ratio (FAR) of the previous project was 3.2 compared to the current proposal of 2.0. The FAR is also consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), and the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09). The PCD-2 Zoning is consistent with the PCD-2 Zoning of properties to the north and northwest. Page 478 of 492 Primary Issue ·Are the proposed Variances justified? 1.As demonstrated in the staff report, staff believe the variance criteria per Chapter 36 of the City Code is met. Findings include: The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance; the circumstances unique to the property were not created by the landowner; the right-of-way width of 30 feet along Eden Avenue; the site abuts Highway 100 on the east side and is buffered by trees in the right-of-way; the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the area. 2.The proposed setbacks are generally consistent with other recent approvals for developments in the area including the Avidor (4 feet from Eden Avenue), the most recently approved plan for the former public works site at 5146 Eden Avenue (5 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (10 feet from Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue). 3.The mass of the building compared to the previously approved residential project for the site would be less. The floor area ratio (FAR) of the previous project was 3.2 compared to the current proposal of 2.0. The FAR is also consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (2.21), Maison Green (2.5), and the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (3.09). Page 479 of 492 Primary Issue ·Are the proposed Variances justified? 4.The proposed height at 81 feet is consistent with other recently approved projects in the area including the Avidor (80 feet / 6 stories), Maison Green (76 feet / 7 stories), the senior housing at 5146 Eden Avenue (83 feet / 6.5 stories), and the previous approval for a multi-family building at this site (82 feet / 7 stories). 5.The requirement that all facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm is intended to result in the use of quality building materials and attractive buildings. In general, the façade is primarily glass so the requirement would apply to all non-glass surfaces. On the ground level, the primary material other than glass is metal panel with a wood-like appearance. The upper floors are almost entirely glass. Therefore, the metal panel serves as more of an accent material than a primary material. The ordinance encourages a high amount of glass with the 75% transparency requirement, which this project complies with. Exchanging the small amount of metal panel would not significantly alter the appearance of the building in this case. 6.The intent of the screening and setback requirements for utility equipment is to maintain an attractive public realm. There are limited options for where the utility equipment can be placed, due to the location of the existing electrical service lines. The applicant has proposed a reasonable plan for screening the equipment and will be responsible for maintaining all screening and landscaping. Page 480 of 492 Staff Recommendation Page 481 of 492 ARCADIA OFFICE EDINA MN, MARCH 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION Page 482 of 492 03 | 2025 SKETCH PLAN COMMENTS AND MASSING MODIFICATIONS Shifted building and podium east to increase setback along Arcadia (+17’ 0”) at level one inset and (+4’ 0”) at parking entry Recessed level 1 frontage along Arcadia. Creating a continuous outdoor porch connecting the main entrance to the southern terrace. A B Added SW balconies facing Arcadia at all office levels. Strengthening connection, activity, and vibrancy of Arcadia. Articulated all façades with specific building materials Mixed use of glass, metal panel, shading fins, etc. C D A A B B C D Page 483 of 492 03 | 2025 SKETCH PLAN COMMENTS AND MASSING MODIFICATIONS Created a new front door experience facing Arcadia Ave. Creates porosity and added access along public way. Removed surface parking within 20’ of property line at SE corner. Additional planted area added to further screen parking. Shifted sidewalk location to create a consistent 6’ wide planted boulevard with canopy trees along Arcadia and Eden. This move allowed the creation of a linear garden between the building and sidewalk along Arcadia Loading Zone shifted to within the garage area. New area is covered with approx. 18’ 0” of overhead clearance and non-visible from public view. E F G H 1 2 3 4 7 8 B C D E 5 6 G H J 9 F A 48' - 6"2 ' - 6 " 3 4 ' - 0 " 1 7' - 0 " 1 1 ' - 9 " 1 4 ' - 0 " 15' - 5"198' - 10" 22' - 0" 9' - 0"19' - 3"123' - 10"22' - 6"14' - 0"37' - 6"29' - 9"2 1' - 0 " FRONTAGE ROAD EDEN AVEARCADIA AVETERRACETERRACECOVERED BREEZEWAYOFFICE LOBBY COMMERCIAL / OFFICE LOADING (18' 0" CLR) NO PARKING PARKING DOWN TO LEVEL P1 UP TO LEVEL 2EDGE OF BUILDING ABOVE DROP-OFF PRIMARY ENTRY RECEPTION PARKINGENTRYPARKING ENTRY TRASHBIKES MONUMENT SIGN EDEN AVE36' - 6" PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA0-3SITE PLAN V2 2024-1264 02/04/25 5115 Arcadia Avenue 5115 ArcadiaAvenue Edina, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 2/18/2025 No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"-3 1 SITE PLAN - LEVEL 01 E F G H G Page 484 of 492 03 | 2025 THE DOCK THE PILOTI ARCADIA PASEO EAST AND WEST SHADING FINS TENANT BALCONIES WRAP AROUND TERRACE CORNER RESPITE PARK DESIGN CONCEPT SUMMARY Page 485 of 492 03 | 2025 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 SHRUBS LONICERA DIERVILLA, BUSH HONEYSUCKLE CORNUS STOLONIFERA, DWARF TWIG DOGWOOD 1 2 TALLGRASS MIX PANICUM VIRGATUM, SWITCHGRASS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM, LITTLE BLUESTEM 4 POLLINATOR MIX ASCLEPIAS INCARNATA, SWAMP MILKWEED ASCLEPIA TUBEROSA, BUTTERFLY WEED ASTER LAEVIS, SMOOTH ASTER EVCHINACEA PURPUREA, PURPLE CONEFLOWER ECHINACEA PURPUREA ‘ALBA’, PURPLE CONEFLOWER ‘ALBA’ RUDBECKIA HIRTA, BLACK EYED SUSAN LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA, PRAIRIE BLAZING STAR LIATRIS LIGULISTYLIS, MEADOW BLAZING STAR STREET TREES QUERCUS BICOLOR, SWAMP WHITE OAK LAWN78 5 6 ORNAMENTAL / SHADE TREES AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA ‘AUTUMN BRILLIANCE’, SERVICEBERRY BETULA POPULIFOLIA ’WHITESPIRE’, GRAY BIRCH ‘ WHITE SPIRE’ THUJA OCCIDENTALIS, ARBOR VITAE AROUND BACK OPUS EDEN 100 DF/ DAMON FARBER PLANTING PALLET Page 486 of 492 03 | 2025 1 2 3 3 3 5 6 8 STREET TREES QUERCUS BICOLOR, SWAMP WHITE OAK LAWN78 SHRUBS LONICERA DIERVILLA, BUSH HONEYSUCKLE CORNUS STOLONIFERA, DWARF TWIG DOGWOOD 1 2 5 6 ORNAMENTAL / SHADE TREES AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA ‘AUTUMN BRILLIANCE’, SERVICEBERRY BETULA POPULIFOLIA ’WHITESPIRE’, GRAY BIRCH ‘ WHITE SPIRE’ THUJA OCCIDENTALIS, ARBOR VITAE AROUND BACK TALLGRASS MIX PANICUM VIRGATUM, SWITCHGRASS SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM, LITTLE BLUESTEM 4 POLLINATOR MIX ASCLEPIAS INCARNATA, SWAMP MILKWEED ASCLEPIA TUBEROSA, BUTTERFLY WEED ASTER LAEVIS, SMOOTH ASTER EVCHINACEA PURPUREA, PURPLE CONEFLOWER ECHINACEA PURPUREA ‘ALBA’, PURPLE CONEFLOWER ‘ALBA’ RUDBECKIA HIRTA, BLACK EYED SUSAN LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA, PRAIRIE BLAZING STAR LIATRIS LIGULISTYLIS, MEADOW BLAZING STAR OPUS EDEN 100 DF/ DAMON FARBER PLANTING PALLET Page 487 of 492 03 | 2025 Page 488 of 492 03 | 2025 Page 489 of 492 03 | 2025 Page 490 of 492 03 | 2025 Page 491 of 492 THANK YOU COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION PLANNING COMMISSION Page 492 of 492