The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-08-13 Planning Commission Packet Meeting location: Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Wednesday, August 13, 2025 7:00 PM Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or at YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535- 8110. Enter access code 2632 559 3077. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn. Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927- 8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes from July 23, 2025 Special Work Session and Regular Meeting 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. 6. Public Hearing During "Public Hearings," the Commission chair will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Chair may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 6.1. 4630 Edgebrook Place-Side Yard Setback Variance Page 1 of 67 7. Chair and Member Comments 8. Staff Comments 9. Adjournment Page 2 of 67 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: August 13, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Planning Commission Agenda Number: 4.1 Prepared By: Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist Item Type: Minutes Department: Item Title: Minutes from July 23, 2025 Special Work Session and Regular Meeting Action Requested: Approve both minutes. Information/Background: Supporting Documentation: 1. 7-23-25 Special Work Session Minutes 2. 7-23-25 Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 67 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 1 of 4 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Special Work Session July 23, 2025 I. Call To Order Vice Chair Alkire called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Alkire, Daye, Padilla, Hahneman, Felt, and Nelson. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Emily Dalrymple, Assistant Planner; Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator; and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Bornstein, Jha and Joncas. III. Kick-Off Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Update Community Development Coordinator Lewis introduced the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance update. He provided an overview of the current zoning ordinance, which was established in 1970, and mentioned the issues identified in the zoning and subdivision ordinance audit report. He noted the report highlighted the need for better alignment with the comprehensive plan, organizational issues, contradictions, and complexity in the code. Mr. Sean Suder, Mr. Michael Stein, Mr. Michael Lamb, and Ms. Emily Harold from the consulting team at Zone Co. delivered a presentation on the scope of work and goals for the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance update. Commissioner Smith joined the work session at 5:11 p.m. Mr. Suder highlighted the importance of aligning the zoning code with the comprehensive plan and emphasized the need for an update. He pointed out the challenges of working with a 55-year-old zoning code and stressed the importance of addressing issues such as single-family zoning, non- conformities, and the absence of medium- or high-density districts. He underscored the need to create user-friendly, equitable, and defensible zoning regulations. Chair Bennett joined the work session at 5:17 p.m. Mr. Suder discussed the current zoning code, which emphasizes single-family zoning, double-dwelling units, regional medical zones, and planned automotive parking zones. He highlighted the need to address non-conformities, develop medium- or high-density districts, and improve the lack of mixed- Page 4 of 67 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 2 of 4 use districts. The existing subdivision code was also reviewed, pointing out issues with confusing language, the absence of a process for small subdivisions or lot splits, and the need for a simpler, clearer code. He suggested that the community should balance property rights with planning goals and create districts that support the development outlined in the comprehensive plan. The project aims to help Edina reach its desired development goals through clear, consistent, user- friendly, equitable, and defensible zoning rules. There was a discussion about the need to balance development pressure with quality of life and the importance of offering a diverse range of housing options. The team emphasized the importance of community engagement and making sure all voices are heard in the zoning process. They discussed the need for community input to shape the zoning code so it reflects the community’s needs and desires. The conversation addressed the importance of balancing property rights with planning goals and emphasized the need for a comprehensive plan update to reflect evolving community needs. There was a suggestion that the community should consider how future planning impacts the zoning process and the importance of adopting a geographic approach to zoning. The question was raised about the lack of density-related language in the project goals and the need to balance development pressure with quality of life. It was noted that the project aims to create zoning districts that accommodate the development outlined in the comprehensive plan, rather than changing existing zoning. The conversation emphasized the need for a balance between single-family housing and higher-density development, as well as the importance of creating districts that offer a variety of housing options. There was also a focus on prioritizing the needs of different community groups, such as those requiring affordable housing and aging populations, during the zoning process. Current and future transit developments have been discussed, along with their impact on zoning. The discussion highlighted the challenges of balancing transit-oriented development with existing infrastructure constraints, such as sewer capacity. It was noted that a significant portion of the city faces sewer capacity limitations, which will influence future growth. The discussion highlighted the importance of a comprehensive planning approach that accounts for both transit and infrastructure limitations. There was a discussion about the importance of community engagement and the need to provide clear, understandable information to the public. The conversation also covered the use of visual preference surveys and other engagement tools to gather community input. The importance of including industrial and office uses in the zoning process, beyond just residential and housing goals, was emphasized. There was discussion about the need to allow more flexibility in Page 5 of 67 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 3 of 4 industrial and office zones to ensure productive property use and prevent vacancies. The conversation highlighted the importance of balancing different land uses, such as retail, office, and residential, to sustain a healthy economic base. Emphasis was placed on supporting the economic drivers of the hospital and other key industries in the community. There was a discussion about the push for affordable housing at the state level and the challenge of balancing local control with state requirements. It was noted that many communities face similar challenges in providing affordable housing while maintaining local control over planning decisions. The conversation emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach to affordable housing that considers both zoning and other factors like supply and demand. The discussion continued around the tension between accommodating more people and preserving existing investments, highlighting the high cost of housing caused by scarcity. It was emphasized that it is important to consider future generations and their ability to live in the community. It was pointed out that affordable housing is not just for low-income individuals but also for families who cannot afford high-priced homes. The conversation touched on the difficulty of returning to the community after college due to high living costs. There was a suggestion to improve communication and transparency to build trust with the community, mentioning platforms like “Better Together” and “Know Your City.” The need for education on technical terms such as affordable housing, comprehensive plans, and zoning was emphasized. There was also a recommendation for regular updates from the City Council to keep residents informed about changes and developments. The importance of community engagement and building trust to facilitate necessary changes was highlighted. Legislative changes and zoning adaptations were discussed, and the impact of state legislative changes on single-unit zoning and the potential for non-conforming areas was questioned. Discussions included the challenges of adapting zoning to accommodate new investments and market demands. There was mention of the potential for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) as a solution, but their high cost was noted. The need for flexibility in building regulations was also discussed, especially regarding parking and other issues. An introduction of bills addressing parking and related issues was mentioned. There were inquiries about best practices for updating commercial zoning chapters, considering a performance-based approach versus specific business lists. A suggestion was made to use broader categories and standards to attract desired retail types while reducing parking requirements. The conversation discussed the possibility of combining retail and industrial uses, with examples like breweries. It also covered the benefits of permitting non-traditional industrial uses to prevent property decay and boost tax revenue. The discussion focused on sewer and water capacity issues in industrial areas, reviewing past resolutions and current challenges. There was also talk about the budget for sewer infrastructure Page 6 of 67 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 4 of 4 upgrades and how they affect housing and commercial growth. Tension between commercial and industrial zones was highlighted, stressing the importance of maintaining an employment base. There was discussion regarding the flexibility needed for small businesses, such as chocolate shops and bakeries, to operate in industrial areas. Examples were shared of mixed-use development with a commercial pasta-making business, highlighting the potential for startup businesses in industrial areas. The discussion covered the historical practice of combining living and working spaces, which is being revived in industrial areas. The conversation also addressed the need for retail sales in all businesses, including global companies, to stay connected with customers. Additionally, challenges of operating a restaurant in an office building were discussed. There was an emphasis on the importance of planning and zoning to reserve areas for employment and prevent overdevelopment in hot retail real estate sectors. There was also a brief discussion on the need for flexible zoning and infrastructure improvements to support community growth and development. V. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:31 p.m. Page 7 of 67 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 1 of 2 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers July 23, 2025 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Alkire, Bornstein, Daye, Felt, Hahneman, Nelson, Padilla, Smith, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator; and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Student Commissioners Jha and Joncas. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Padilla moved to approve the agenda for July 23, 2025. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, June 25, 2025 Commissioner Felt indicated she had an edit on the first public hearing. She noted that the total vote count should be eight, not nine. Commissioner Felt moved to approve the amended June 25, 2025, meeting minutes. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment None. VI. Public Hearings A. Conditional Use Permit – Rivian at Galleria Community Development Coordinator Lewis presented the Rivian request for a Conditional Use Permit. Staff recommend approving the conditional use permit as requested, subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Page 8 of 67 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 2 of 2 Sam Moon, Regional Development Lead of Rivian; Siobhan Lee, Lead Design Manager of Rivian; Paul Wagner, Property Manager of the Galleria; along with Madison Grothaus, Sr., Architect from Reztark Design Studio, addressed the commission. The commission asked the staff and the applicants questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Bornstein moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the conditional use permit and deemed the proposed changes to be appropriate. A complete commission discussion can be reviewed on the official City Website. Motion Commissioner Padilla moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the conditional use permit for Rivian to operate an automobile agency selling new, unused vehicles at 3510 Galleria as outlined in the staff memo, subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried 8 ayes, 1 nay (Nelson). IX. Chair and Member Comments Received. X. Staff Comments Received. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Alkire moved to adjourn the July 23, 2025, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:07 p.m. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Page 9 of 67 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: August 13, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Planning Commission Agenda Number: 6.1 Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Item Title: 4630 Edgebrook Place-Side Yard Setback Variance Action Requested:Approve the request for a 3.5-foot side yard setback variance to allow a 6.5-foot setback for an addition at 4630 Edgebrook Place. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The side yard setback practical difficulty is caused by the existing building wall not being parallel to the property line. If the existing wall was parallel to the property line, the first and second floor addition would conform to the alternate setback standards and not require a variance. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The side yard setback variance is reasonable. Remodeling and adding onto the home is a practical solution and allows for rehabilitation, which is the preferred treatment for heritage preservation resources in the Country Club District. 4. There are circumstances that are unique to the subject property. The existing house currently has a nonconforming side yard setback which was a condition of when the house was originally constructed in 1935. 5. The proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed addition will maintain the character of the colonial revival style house located within the historic Country Club District. Information/Background: The property at 4630 Edgebrook Place is a two-story single-family residential home located in the Country Club District and built in 1935. The applicant is proposing an addition to the basement, first and second floor off the rear of the existing house to allow for additional garage and living space. The proposed addition off of the rear of the existing house continues off the existing non-conforming wall which is not parallel to the property line. The existing non-conforming side yard setback is 6.6 feet. The proposed addition gets slightly closer to the property line and is proposed to have a setback of 6.5 feet from the side yard property line. Better Together Public Input Supporting Documentation: 1. Applicant Submittal 2. Staff Report 3. Better Together Public Input Report 4. Staff Presentation Page 10 of 67 4630 Edgebrook Place – Project Narrative & Practical Diiculties for Variance Request Project Narrative 4630 Edgebrook Place is located in the R-1 district in the Country Club District Brown section of Edina. This lot is considered 80’-0” wide (at 50’ back of the front yard setback) which requires a 10’- 0” side yard setback. The existing home sits over the side yard setback by approximately 3’-0”. The ordinance under Alternate Setbacks will allow continuing the nonconformance up to 200 square feet “on the same floor as the existing encroachment into the nonconforming setback”. The south property line is not perfectly aligned to the house’s wall plane. As the house continues the non- conformity, it gets slightly closer to the property line (by 0.1’). We are proposing continuing the nonconformance on three levels: · Upper level: 47 sf approx.. (requires a variance) · Main level: 47 sf approx.. (requires a variance) · Lower level: 127 sf approx. (requires a variance) Although the lower level part of the addition is less than 200sf over the setback, the lower level is currently unexcavated and does not fall under the Alternate Setbacks rule, requiring a variance. Practical Diiculties The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. This variance is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance. This would not require a variance if there had been existing living space in this part of the house as it is under 200 sf. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Ordinance allows continuing the nonconformity up to 200sf and the addition stays under that total on each level The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. The existing property building coverage is at approximately 14.4% building coverage. With the additions proposed (at this location and others) total around 18.5%, which is under the required 25%. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The existing house with attached garage are over the 10’-0” side yard setback. This was not created by the current homeowners. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The addition on the south side of the house will not alter the essential character of the locality. Maintaining the character of this original house is very important being in the historic Country Club District. Other designs were considered of stepping the addition back from the side yard setback, but ultimately were not selected to keep the volumes simple as the style demands. Page 11 of 67 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE AMERICAN COLONIAL REVIVAL YEAR BUILT: 1935 UPDATED: JULY 31, 2025 Page 12 of 67 AMERICAN COLONIAL REVIVAL CHARACTER DEFINING ELEMENTS & EXISTING PROJECTING DORMERS ACCENTUATED FRONT DOOR & PORTICO WITH CURVED UNDERSIDE AND GABLED ROOF SIDE GABLED ROOF PAIRED WINDOWS DOUBLE HUNG SASHES WITH 6-8 PANES BRICK VENEER (COMMON TO 1920-1930'S ERA) DECORATIVE CROWN SUPPORTED BY PILASTERS & SLENDER COLUMNS BOXED CORNICE SIDE LIGHT WINDOWS FANLIGHT PANEL (Colonial Revival Diagram from “A Field Guide to American Houses” by Virginia McAlester - published in 1984) Page 13 of 67 AMERICAN COLONIAL REVIVAL CHARACTER DEFINING ELEMENTS & PROPOSED PROJECTING DORMERS ACCENTUATED FRONT DOOR & PORTICO WITH CURVED UNDERSIDE AND GABLED ROOF SIDE GABLED ROOF PAIRED WINDOWS DOUBLE HUNG SASHES WITH 6-8 PANES BRICK VENEER (COMMON TO 1920-1930'S ERA) DECORATIVE CROWN SUPPORTED BY PILASTERS & SLENDER COLUMNS BOXED CORNICE SIDE LIGHT WINDOWS FANLIGHT PANEL REMOVED IN LIEU OF NEW ARCHED TOP DOOR NEW DOUBLE HUNG SASHES (8 PANE) Page 14 of 67 HISTORIC PHOTOS OF PROPERTY YEAR BUILT: 1935 (SOURCE: CITY OF EDINA) yor-&-e_kirs VE PA Fl Kirf 5500 1958 - NEW GARAGE AND SCREEN PORCH CONSTRUCTED 1983 -RENOVATION WORK TO UPPER LEVEL - er. -17V1 2025 - PRESENT DAY 1966 - BEDROOM OVER GARAGE CONSTRUCTED Page 15 of 67 IDENTIAL PROPERTY' RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD ADDRESS 4q-3e? PLAT NO 7c5Ze) PARCEL NO DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE OTHER STRUCTURES SINGLE DWLG. Yr. Built Grade .. No. of Stories Const. Cost Bsmt. MULTI. DWLG. Observed Physical Condition: Good Normal Fair Poor Mo. Rental ;tenor 18-028-24-24-0082 ROOF PLUMBING ROOMS WIRING E :re' •-••• FOUNDATION JOHN M. BEAN Caacrete Flat City Water "'Living Room FP BX CABLE ELIZABETH G . BEAN Conc. Blk. Gable .., Well & Pump Dining 4,- Rigid Conduit Brick i.,: , Hip Sewer Kitchen r....' BUILT-INS 4630 EDGEBROOK PL Irregular Septic Tank Bedrooms 7. :,.. 1. Breakfast Nook . ,......, %EXTERIOR WALLS Shingle, Asphalt Cesspool Den or Study2NPFLR eig BORif Bookcases :.------ ED I NA MN 55424 Siding and Sheeting Shingle, Wood., ,„ Baths 13 Fixt.) -,1. Rec. Room f,'China Closet 1, 1../ $ ,, F. _ ii,: , (-, Wood Shakes Slate ‘li 14 Half Bath (2 Fixt.) / Utility trtra Kit. Cabts. e i Composition Shakes Tile Single Fixtures l' / ,, • Refrigerator t-..,...... r---- -7 ".-1 4.--'-' '..-r • -lb ' • Redwood Roll, Composition Hot W.—Elec.—Gas,-,i Range Er Oven l':,% C?7..- 0/24/#14011. nAlrY ?f;durzg - ofri'"i" "5-?/,17,- 3 le/Je Stucco Shakes Water Softner INTERIOR FINISH Dishwasher C,'77 Brick Veneer , -)1 .---- Tar and Gravel Hdwd. Floors 1./ Garbage Disp. , A-,,,-f ,r,i,S"'' ''-'1 fe -C - & ••-, . - Com. or Rug. r. ,ye Insulated HEATING Softwood Floors Crlq ir.1,-4k V.• -I OUT BUILDINGS Sheds, Cabins, Boathouses, Shops, Greenhouses, Etc. Roman or Face 1 - Fireplaces Inside r Concrete Floors TILING (Sq. Ft.) ., Stone BASEMENT Fireplaces Outside •.. Linoleum Floors Cer.S..-Plas. Describe: --.' None Full Hot Air: Pipeless Carpeted Floors V Bath ----- Hall ) Insulated Yes No Partial % Piped (Gravity) Hardwood Trim Kitchen _ „4, PORCHES Unfinished Forcect-CTecetre, -.,:, Softwood Trim BUILDING DIAGRAM AND OUTBUILDINGS .., Glazed: Partitioned Steam •.1 Plastered Int. V MISCELLANEOUS Screen: Finished H. H. Water or Vapor Drywall Int. Incinerator Draw to scale and show dimensions Open: Walkout •Ssj % ,,-- Radiant Concealed Laminated Swim. Pool Oil— Coal— as— /"..., 7Z. l'-',/,'7:1-',-`1 1 Date of Appraisal By: 7 -, Interior Inspected Yes_______ No STRUCTURAL VALUE COMPUTATIONS 111 AREA DEP. & OBS. NET MARKET STRUCTURES DIMENSIONS SQ. FT. RATE/S.F. % OFF RATE/S.F VALUE = - ..• ., fir .... /6,.. . ...... .----.--=:.--, . vi.::- %;ik ....... HOUSE 'X 71-7 I 1.;(- ,/ - 4 r > .. Sh„.. \m ks .5 <57. Flat Charges Repl. Cost /5"; Si - , . kL Nli Basement Finished ,4", -:- , -=2 X , .•--5- /. - ' ' • -, Attic Finished -". • i- (3/1115 ...e--.AO•f: •' • • ..... Are" Extra Plumbing X??I' I.P/ z _ Built-ins Cr Misc. , .,.-.,-. -..‘. n. "'" .. Porches---' ' ...,•-", 4,, . , It • A ....3 TOTAL $ TOTAL FLAT CHARGES /AREA = s I GARAGE ..20 X ,..,-,,..:, --,Le/ '., .. /V.E. I.--yi q 1 < • 2 •••7•7, -- E.RE-ErEWAY 7'1,1 X /.‘/ 3 56 .., • ......... (\i• a A ;!7.44 6, :e- IIPI rt**), CN. s t ry .......... • ,t.-(r;e4, ' .'-e-‘--7- 4 AP tk YARD IMPS. / ••2- • ...‹)., • ,.-/ "i •er'Y 37 OUTBUILDINGS ,. 19 TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES $ Future Adjustments:' -,yag- _ /4evp er:IZ) r rr-'e-Are /Q1 F ,7e 4a ,t) %akat Kirewbu Alcor c4461, f e•ett) IknftVi /WKS /MO 0".. A. Zg. 2 5ntr.41 41-1 Galt "t'AT Kr-4 Red mew/ o Tr ei.:4•Tr griv pita Tfrtiew r 10/17/58 outside year of significance "new garage"7/5/66: "B.R OVER GAR" ARCHIVAL DOCUMENTATION GARAGE CONSTRUCTION: 1958 (SOURCE: CITY OF EDINA) Page 16 of 67 HISTORIC PHOTO VS EXISTING OLDEST PHOTO ON RECORD 1958 (SOURCE: CITY OF EDINA) -17V1 Page 17 of 67 CURRENT PHOTOS OF PROPERTY (2017-2025) Page 18 of 67 PROPOSED FROM STREET 3D RENDERINGS - FRONT FACADE Page 19 of 67 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 3D RENDERINGS - FRONT FACADE Page 20 of 67 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 3D RENDERINGS - FRONT FACADE PERSPECTIVE Page 21 of 67 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 3D RENDERINGS - FRONT FACADE PERSPECTIVE Page 22 of 67 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 3D RENDERINGS - SOUTH FACADE Page 23 of 67 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED 3D RENDERINGS - NORTH FACADE Page 24 of 67 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - WEST FACADE Page 25 of 67 TA/C LOT 14S44°02'14"E 51.82---S45°52'45"W 156.86---N46°27'27"W 103.59Δ=5°39'25"L=18.07 R=183.0321±36±---C. BRG.=S43°18'08"E C.=69.87---20905.2TC905.3905.4905.2904.4904.5TC904.7904.8TC904.7TC904.6905.5904.7904.8904.0904.4904.5904.7904.8904.4904.4904.6904.5904.2TC905.0905.4906.1905.0905.1904.9905.1906.3904.9905.0905.1905.1904.9903.8903.2902.4902.5905.0902.0902.6901.2902.0901.0TW901.9904.8905.8903.9903.9903.2904.0903.6903.6901.2902.1899.0TW897.5899.6897.6898.0897.3897.6899.0TW898.3TW 897.8 T W901.4895.8896.5898.3TW895.3895.7TW895.8897.0897.0896.6898.8TW897.2900.3897.3TW896.8896.6896.6897.2896.1895.7892.9895.2TW 893.2890.1896.4893.7895.5TW898.3885.9886.9889.0887.4885.5885.8885.4884.8885.6890.5886.4886.0886.8886.8886.3886.2887.4887.1884.8885.3884.8885.6885.4884.8884.8885.5886.2885.9885.7884.8904.0904.26.66.932.61 0 .3 8 .9 8 .31 6 .2 7 .1115.6 OHW116.7 OHW41.16 .0 20.67.640.628.236.15.45.82.89.72.85.741.2CANTILEVER896.6BELOWBELOW898.3884.8903.1CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYPAVER WALKSTONE STEPSSTONE STEPSC O N CR ETE W ALKW#101#102#10440"MAPLEM ILL P O N D M IN N EH A H A C R E EKDWNDWNDWN U P P E R LE VE L D E C K P A TIO B E LO W D E C K LO W E R LE V E L D E C KBELOW897.3905.6899.2#4630 EDGEBROOK PL.FIRST FLOOR=905.2GARAGE FLOOR=905.1LOW OPENING=897.7904.7#462688 6 886887888889890891892893#103898894895896896897894.5TW 8999009018 958968 9 7898899900901902903904904 8 8 8 8 8 7 8868 8 9 8 9 0 8 9 1 8 9 2 8 9 3 8 9 4 8 9 5 8 9 6 8 9 7 8 9 8899900901902904903905906906905905905905905 ---N57°36'13"E 165.54---905S TO O P SURVEY LINEN W L - TO P OF B A N K888.9 LO C A L 1% A N N U A LC H A N C E FLO O D IN U N D A TION 888.9 LO C A L 1% F LO O D 8 8 8 .9 L O C A L 1 % F L O O D E D G E O F W A T E R R IP R A P RIP RAPEDGE OF WATERCHAD & JESSICA KELLYEXISTING CONDITION SURVEY FOR:PROPERTY DESCRIPTION4630 Edgebrook Pl.Edina, MN 55424BENCHMARKSITE ADDRESST.N.H. at the Northeast Corner of #4626 Edgebrook Pl.Elevation = 905.90.Lot 14, Block 14, COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT BROWN SECTION,Hennepin County, Minnesota.1" = 10'CME172-251 of 1DRAWNREFERENCESCALEBOOK/PAGESHEETJOB NO.07-01-2025I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota.Woodrow A. Brown, R.L.S. MN REG 15230W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC.Dated:SCALE IN FEET1001020NWBBloomington, MN 55425Email: INFO@WBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COMPh: (952) 854-4055WBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COMW. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC.8030 Old Cedar Avenue So., Suite 228GENERAL NOTES:· Existing building dimensions are measured to siding and not building foundation.· No title commitment was provided and no research was performed for any easementsnot shown on this survey.· Location of utilities shown are from observed evidence in the field and/or plansfurnished by others and are considered approximate. Gopher State One Call or aprivate utility locator should be contacted to locate utilities on site before excavation.REMARKSDATEREVISIONSLOT AREA CALCULATION:Lot Area to NWL = 17,114 SFEXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE:House w/ Cantilever = 2,061 SFDeck 547 SF (Less 150 SF Allowance) = 397 SFTotal = 2,458 SFExisting Building Coverage = 14.4%EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:House w/ Cantilever = 2,061 SFWalks, Stoops, Stone Steps = 684 SFDriveway = 569 SFDeck w/ Steps = 624 SFTotal = 3,938 SFExisting Impervious Surface = 23.0%NOTE:25% Maximum Allowable Building Coverage50% Maximum Allowable Impervious SurfaceEDGEBROOK PLACEN W L NWLNWLN W L N W L NW LLEGENDFenceRetaining WallTimber Retaining WallTelephone PedestalWater MainWater Shutoff ValveExisting ElevationTop of Curb ElevationFound Iron Monument Existing Contour900Top of Wall Elevation900.0900.0TC900.0TWWTNormal Water Level - Top of BankNWLC.R.Z. = Critical Root ZoneD.B.H. = Diameter at Breast HeightTREE INVENTORYTREE NO.SPECIESD.B.H.HEIGHTC.R.Z.CLASSIFICATIONNOTES#101 ASH 10" 15' NOT PROTECTED#102 LOCUST 16" 24' NOT PROTECTED#103 HACKBERRY 16 24' PROTECTED#104 ASH 14" 21' NOT PROTECTED#105 MAPLE 40" 60' HERITAGE126-18 158/20BLOCK SETBACKSWESTERLY SIDE OF EDGEBROOK PL.FRONT YARD SETBACKADDRESS#4618#4614#4612 28.7'#4626#4622#4634#4630 (SITE)#4640#463834.9'34.1'39.5'41.1'32.6'39.3'40.5'36.4'39.3SSanitary ManholeSSANITARY M.H.RIM=891.36INV.=884.21889.9>> S S >>S S >>S S 8"V C P -C IP P >>S S>>S S 8"V C P -C IP P Sanitary SewerSSS S SS<<S A NI T A R Y S E W E R LIN E P E R FIE LD LOCA T ION P O T E NT IA L 20' S A N ITA R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T IF R E Q'D . (F IE LD V E R IFY )893892891890889888887101010100.2±0.7±BLOCK AVERAGE = 36.3'#463436.3' BLOCK AVG . FRO NT YARD SETBACK10' SIDE YARD SETBACK50' S E T B A C K F R O M N W L10' SIDE YARD SETBACKAPPROX. SANITARY SEWER LINE PERGIS MAPPING (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)26.538.5902.7905.7TW905.7TW9 0 3905.4Rock Retaining WallPage 26 of 67 #4630 EDGEBROOK PL.FIRST FLOOR=905.2GARAGE FLOOR=905.1LOW OPENING WALKOUT THRESHOLD=897.7BASEMENT FLOOR=897.6TA/C LOT 14S44°02'14"E 51.82---S45°52'45"W 156.86---N46°27'27"W 103.59Δ=5°39'25"L=18.07 R=183.0321±36±---C. BRG.=S43°18'08"E C.=69.87---20905.2TC905.3905.4905.2904.4904.5TC904.7904.8TC904.7TC904.6905.5904.7904.8904.0904.4904.5904.7904.8904.4904.4904.6904.5904.2TC905.0905.4906.1905.0905.1904.9905.1906.3904.9905.0905.1905.1904.9903.8903.2902.4902.5905.0902.0902.6901.2901.9904.8905.8903.9903.9903.2904.0903.6903.6901.2902.1899.0TW897.5899.6897.6898.0897.3897.6899.0TW897.8 T W901.4895.8896.5895.3895.7TW897.0897.2897.3TW896.8896.6896.6897.2896.1895.7892.9895.2TW 893.2890.1896.4893.7895.5TW898.3885.9886.9889.0887.4885.5885.8885.4884.8885.6890.5886.4886.0886.8886.8886.3886.2887.4887.1884.8885.3884.8885.6885.4884.8884.8885.5886.2885.9885.7884.8904.0904.26.66.932.61 0 .3 8 .9 8 .31 6 .2 7 .1116.7 OHW41.16 .0 20.67.640.628.236.15.425.141.2CANTILEVER898.3884.8903.1CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE DRIVEWAYPAVER WALKSTONE STEPSC O N CR ETE W ALKW#101#102#10440"MAPLEM ILL P O N D M IN N EH A H A C R E EK897.3904.7#462688 6 886887888889890891892893#103898894895896896897894.5TW 8999009018 958968978988999009019029 0 39049048 8 8 8 8 7 8868 8 9 8 9 0 8 9 1 8 9 2 8 9 3 8 9 4 8 9 5 8 9 6 897898899900901 902904905906906905905905905905 ---N57°36'13"E 165.54---905S TO O P SURVEY LINEN W L - TO P OF B A N K888.9 LO C A L 1% A N N U A LC H A N C E FLO O D IN U N D A TION 888.9 LO C A L 1% F LO O D 8 8 8 .9 L O C A L 1 % F L O O D E D G E O F W A T E R R IP R A P RIP RAPEDGE OF WATERCHAD & JESSICA KELLYSITE PLAN | PROPOSED ADDITION for:PROPERTY DESCRIPTION4630 Edgebrook Pl.Edina, MN 55424BENCHMARKSITE ADDRESST.N.H. at the Northeast Corner of #4626 Edgebrook Pl.Elevation = 905.90.Lot 14, Block 14, COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT BROWN SECTION,Hennepin County, Minnesota.1" = 10'CME172-251 of 1DRAWNREFERENCESCALEBOOK/PAGESHEETJOB NO.07-10-2025I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota.Woodrow A. Brown, R.L.S. MN REG 15230W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC.Dated:SCALE IN FEET1001020NWBBloomington, MN 55425Email: INFO@WBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COMPh: (952) 854-4055WBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COMW. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC.8030 Old Cedar Avenue So., Suite 228GENERAL NOTES:· Existing building dimensions are measured to siding and not building foundation.· No title commitment was provided and no research was performed for any easementsnot shown on this survey.· Location of utilities shown are from observed evidence in the field and/or plansfurnished by others and are considered approximate. Gopher State One Call or aprivate utility locator should be contacted to locate utilities on site before excavation.REMARKSDATEREVISIONSLOT AREA CALCULATION:Lot Area to NWL = 17,114 SFEXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE:House w/ Cantilever = 2,061 SFDeck 547 SF (Less 150 SF Allowance) = 397 SFTotal = 2,458 SFExisting Building Coverage = 14.4%EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:House w/ Cantilever = 2,061 SFWalks, Stoops, Stone Steps = 684 SFDriveway = 569 SFDeck w/ Steps = 624 SFTotal = 3,938 SFExisting Impervious Surface = 23.0%PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE:House w/ Cantilever = 2,061 SFDemo Existing Deck = 0 SFProposed House Additions = 1,052 SFProposed Deck (Excluding Above Addition, Less 150 SF Allowance) = 44 SFTotal = 3,157 SFExisting Building Coverage = 18.5%PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:House w/ Cantilever = 2,061 SFWalks, Stoops, Stone Steps = 684 SFDemo Stone Steps/Walk at SE'ly House Corner = -73 SFDriveway = 569 SFDemo Existing Deck w/ Steps = 0 SFProposed House Additions = 1,052 SFProposed Deck w/ Steps (Excluding Above Addition) = 244 SFProposed Patio = 380 SFProposed Steps at SE'ly House Addition = 30 SFTotal = 4,947 SFExisting Impervious Surface = 28.9%*Proposed Net Impervious Surface Increase = 1,009 SFNOTE:25% Maximum Allowable Building Coverage50% Maximum Allowable Impervious SurfaceEDGEBROOK PLACEN W L NWLNWLN W L N W L NW LLEGENDFenceRetaining WallTimber Retaining WallTelephone PedestalWater MainWater Shutoff ValveExisting ElevationTop of Curb ElevationFound Iron Monument Existing Contour900Top of Wall Elevation900.0900.0TC900.0TWWTNormal Water Level - Top of BankNWLC.R.Z. = Critical Root ZoneD.B.H. = Diameter at Breast HeightTREE INVENTORYTREE NO.SPECIESD.B.H.HEIGHTC.R.Z.CLASSIFICATIONTREE PLAN NOTES#101 ASH 10" 15' REMOVABLE SAVE, OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS#102 LOCUST 16" 24' REMOVABLE SAVE, PROTECT AS REQ'D.#103 HACKBERRY 16 24' PROTECTED SAVE, PROTECT AS REQ'D.#104 ASH 14" 21' REMOVABLE SAVE, OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS#105 MAPLE 40" 60' HERITAGE SAVE, OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS126-18 158/20BLOCK SETBACKSWESTERLY SIDE OF EDGEBROOK PL.FRONT YARD SETBACKADDRESS#4618#4614#4612 28.7'#4626#4622#4634#4630 (SITE)#4640#463834.9'34.1'39.5'41.1'32.6'39.3'40.5'36.4'39.3SSanitary ManholeSSANITARY M.H.RIM=891.36INV.=884.21889.9>> S S >>S S >>S S 8"V C P -C IP P >>S S>>S S 8"V C P -C IP P Sanitary SewerSSS S SS<<S A NI T A R Y S E W E R LIN E P E R FIE LD LOCA T ION P O T E NT IA L 20' S A N ITA R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T IF R E Q'D . (F IE LD V E R IFY )893892891890889888887101010100.2±0.7±BLOCK AVERAGE = 36.3'#463436.3' BLOCK AVG . FRO NT YARD SETBACK10' SIDE YARD SETBACK50' S E T B A C K F R O M N W L10' SIDE YARD SETBACKAPPROX. SANITARY SEWER LINE PERGIS MAPPING (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION)26.538.5902.7905.7TW905.7TW9 0 3905.4Rock Retaining WallBA S E M E N T F LO O R W A LK O U T =897.6903897896895RELOCATE A/C UNIT1 6 .3 897PROPOSED ADDITION2.237.60PROPOSED ADDITIONBASEMENT FLOOR=(895.6)PROPOSED ADDITIONBASEMENT FLOOR=(895.6)PROPOSEDPROPOSED PATIOProposed ElevationProposed Contour900(900.0)101.1 NWLMAIN LEVEL DECKAT GRADE32.8Proposed Silt Fence/Erosion Control895896897898899900901902PROPOSED STEPS902.06.5AVG. EXISTING FRONT YARD GRADE=904.5AVG. PROPOSED REAR YARD GRADE=(895.1)PROPOSED ADDITIONBASEMENT FLOOR=(895.6)LOW ER LEVEL ONLY(DECK ABOVE)Total Linear Wall Distance = 243.6'Average Existing Front Yard Grade = 904.5Average Proposed Rear Yard Grade = (895.1)Wall Above 899.8 Mid-Grade El. = 138.8' or 57.0%Wall Below 899.8 Mid-Grade El. = 104.8' or 43.0%895.8896.6(899.8)(899.8)(8 9 5 .1 )(8 9 5.1 )(895.1)(895.1)89589 5 BASEMENT FLOOR CALCULATION17.7215.331 8.0 9 16.0718.5621.0722.5815.3311.6523.5911.92894893892SITE PLAN NOTES:· Builder to verify proposed floor elevations.· General contractor assumes responsibility for dimensions, grades,elevations, notes, and conformity to local and IRC codes. Verify theseplans for possible changes prior to construction.· Patios, walks, driveways and retaining walls subject to design changes.*NO SUMP DISCHARGE WAS OBSERVED ON SITE.Page 27 of 67 50'-0" REAR YARD SB FROM OHWM(VERIFY ELEV)FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODWAY(APPROX. LOCATION)10'-0" SIDE YARD SB 1 0 ' - 0 " S I D E Y A R D S BPROPERTY LINE (APPROX.)4630 EDGEBROOKPLACEORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE80'-4" (LOT WIDTH 50' BACK FROM FRONT LOT LINE)DECKDRIVEWAYA/CLOT 14S44°02'14"E 51.82-- - S 4 5 ° 5 2 ' 4 5 "W 1 5 6 . 8 6 - - -N46°27'27"W 103.59Δ=5°39'25"L=18.07 R=183.03---C. BRG.=S43°18'08"E C.=69.87---905.2TC905.3905.4905.2904.5TC904.7904.8TC904.7TC904.6905.5904.7904.8904.0904.7904.8904.4904.4904.6904.5905.0905.4906.1905.0905.1904.9905.1906.3904.9905.0905.1905.1904.9903.8903.2902.4902.5905.0902.0902.6901.2902.0901.0TW901.9904.8905.8903.9903.9903.2904.0903.6903.6901.2902.1899.0TW897.5899.6897.6898.0897.3897.6899.0TW898.3TW897.8TW901.4895.8896.5898.3TW895.3895.7TW895.8897.0897.0896.6898.8TW897.2900.3897.3TW896.8896.6896.6897.2896.1895.7892.9895.2TW893.2890.1896.4893.7895.5TW898.3885.9886.9889.0887.4885.8890.5886.8886.2887.4887.1885.3884.8885.6885.4884.8886.2885.9904.26.66.93 2 . 6 10.38.98.316.27.1115.6 OHW 116.7 OHW6.020.67 . 6 40.62 8 . 2 36.15.45.82.8 9.72.85.74 1 . 2 C A N T I L E V E R896.6BELOWBELOW898.3903.1CO N C R E T E W A L K CO N C R E T E D R I V EW A Y PAVER WALK STONE S T E P S STONE STEPSCONCRETE WALKW#102#10440"MAPLEILL PONDHA CREEKDWN DWNDWN UPPER LEVEL DECKPATIO BELOW DECKLOWER LEVEL DECKBELOW897.3905.6899.2#4630 EDGEBROOK PL.FIRST FLOOR=905.2GARAGE FLOOR=905.1LOW OPENING=897.7904.7#4626886886887888889890891892893#103898894895896896897894.5TW899900901895896 89789889990090190290390490 4888887889890891892893894895 896897898899900901902904 903 9 0 5 9 0 6 9 0 6 9 0 5 9 0 5905 9059 0 5 ---N57°36'13"E 165.54---905STOOPSURVEY LINENWL - TOP OF BANK888.9 LOCAL 1% ANNUALCHANCE FLOOD INUNDATION888.9 LOCAL 1% FLOOD888.9 LOCAL 1% FLOODRIP RAPEDGEBROOK PLACENWLNWLSSANITARY M.H.RIM=891.36INV.=884.21889.9>>SS>>SS>>SS 8"VCP-CIPP>>SS>>SS 8"VCP-CIPPSSSS <<SANITARY SEWER LINEPER FIELD LOCATIONPOTENTIAL 20' SANITARY SEWEREASEMENT IF REQ'D. (FIELD VERIFY)8938928918908898888871 0 10 10100.2±36.3' BLOCK AVG. FRONT YARD SETBACK1 0 ' S I D E Y AR D S E T B A C K50' SETBACK FROM NWL10' SIDE YARD SETBACK APPR O X . S A N I T A R Y S E W E R L I N E P E R GIS M A P P I N G ( F I E L D V E R I F Y L O C A T I O N )26.538.5902.7905.7TW905.7TW903905.436.3' AVG FRONT YARD SBNEIGHBORNEIGHBOR1EXISTING SITE DIAGRAM(APPROX SCALE) 1/8" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/16" = 1'-0" on 11x17NX01EXISTING SITE DIAGRAMATW, SURVEYORZONING SUMMARYZONING DISTRICT: R-1YEAR BUILT: 1935EXISTING LOT TOTALS (APPROX.)·TOTAL LOT SIZE: 17,396 SF·TOTAL HOUSE FOOTPRINT: 2,061 SF·TOTAL DECK: 547 -150 = 397 SF·TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE: 2,458 SF (14.4%)BUILDING COVERAGE EXCEPTIONS:Decks and patios. The first 150 square feet of an unenclosed deck orpatio shall not be included when computing building coverage.Sec. 36-438. Requirements for building coverage, impervioussurface lot coverage, setbacks and height. Lots 9,000 square feetor greater in area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percentfor all buildings and structures. On lots with an existing conditional use,if the combined total area occupied by all accessory buildings andstructures, excluding attached garages, is 1,000 square feet or greater,a conditional use permit is required.MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE:·< 25% OF LOT AREA = 4,349 SF(SEE SURVEY FOR IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE - EXISTINGAND PROPOSED)GENERAL SETBACKS AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS:PRIMARY STRUCTURE·FRONT YARD: 30'**·SIDE YARD(S): 10'·REAR YARD: 50' FROM OHWM·HEIGHT: 2 12 stories (35' based on 80' prop. width - HPC rulestrump) Measured from highest point on roof, shall not exceed 30'.For lots that exceed 75' in width, the max. height shall be 35'+Xwhere X is equal to one inch per foot beyond 75' lot width with amax. of 40'.Sect. 36-429 Special requirements.a.Established front street setback. When more than 25 percentof the lots on one side of a street between streetintersections, on one side of a street that ends in acul-de-sac, or on one side of a dead-end street, are occupiedby dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall bedetermined as follows:1.If there is an existing dwelling unit on an abutting lot ononly one side of the lot that has a front street setback onthe same street, the front street setback requirement shallbe the same as the front street setback of the dwellingunit on the abutting lot on the same street; or the frontstreet setback shall be the average front street setback ofall other dwelling units on the same side of that street,between intersections.2.If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on bothsides of the lot that both have a front street setback onthe same street, the front street setback shall be theaverage of the front street setbacks of the dwelling unitson the two abutting lots on the same street; or the frontstreet setback shall be the average front street setback ofall other dwelling units on the same side of that street,between intersections.FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT & MCWD PERMIT RULESSECTION 36-1268 - Setbacks from naturally occurring lakes, pondsand streams. "... All principal and accessory structures shall maintain aminimum setback of 50 feet from the ordinary high-water elevation.."FEMA BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: 888.2' (*need to stay 2' above -890.2') or walk-out basement from this point. Basement can be up to888.2.=, but no lower.FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION:·Altering or filling land below the 100-year high water elevation of awater bodyEROSION CONTROL:·Exposing 5,000 square feet of soil·Grading, excavating, filling, or on-site storing of 50 cubic yards ofsoilREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION Page 28 of 67 #102#104#4630 EDGEBROOK PL.FIRST FLOOR=905.2GARAGE FLOOR=905.1LOW OPENING=897.7#4626#103SSANITARY M.H.RIM=891.36INV.=884.21905.7TW905.7TW 50'-0" REAR YARD SB FROM OHWM(VERIFY ELEV)FEMA 100-YEARFLOODWAY 888.9'(APPROX. LOC.)10'-0" SIDE YARD SB1 0'- 0 " S I D E Y A R D S B EROSION AND SEDIMENT NOTES FROM CITY OF EDINA1. (Name of Builder) is responsible for the cleanliness of thesite and the maintenance of the erosion and sedimentcontrols and can be reached at (Telephone number).2. The street will be swept clean before the end of each day ofactive construction, when sediment is tracked into thestreet.3. Areas with slopes greater than 3 to 1 and areas next towetlands/waterbodies graded or exposed duringconstruction shall be protected with temporary vegetation,mulching or other means as soon as practical and doublesilt fence.4. All exposed soil areas will be stabilized as soon as practical.Unworked soils that remain exposed and not in use forlonger than 14 days will be covered with temporary seed(grass, oats, or wheat).5. No concrete washout shall occur on site unless it is donewith an approved Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) device or standard.6. Stockpiles shall be surrounded with adequate perimetercontrol to prevent sedimentation and erosion.7. From March 21st to November 1st, drop inlet protection withcurb overflow installed in all storm sewer inlets downstreamof the site within one block or as directed by the City.8. Site shall be kept clean at all times and refuse properlycontrolled.9. Temporary pumping shall not be permitted without the useof an approved Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) device or standard.10. Soil compaction shall be minimized; areas of compactedsoil will be removed or loosened via tilling to a depth of noless than 4 inches.11. Dust control measures shall be taken.12. The contractor shall inspect on a weekly basis and after anyrainfall greater than 1” all erosion control devices and makeany repairs immediately. An inspection log shall be kept onsite detailing these inspections and repairs performed.80'-4" (LOT WIDTH 50' BACK FROM FRONT LOT LINE)70'-0"DRIVEWAY,SWEPT DAILYDECKPATIOAT GRADE4630 EDGEBROOKPLACECONDITIONEDBELOWADDITIONADDITIONUTILITYEASEMENTSILT SOCK/FENCEPROTECTTREENEIGHBORCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEDROP INLET PROTECTION WITHCURB OVERFLOW FOR ALL STORMSEWER INLETS DOWNSTREAM OFTHE SITE WITHIN ONE BLOCK OR ASDIRECTED BY THE CITYOHWLPROP. LINE APPROX17SF ADDITION INLINE WITH EXISTING(WHICH DOES NOTENCROACH CLOSERTO PROPERTY LINE)NON-CONFORMINGVARIANCE LOCATION:·LOWER LEVEL:127 SF·MAIN LEVEL: 47 SF·UPPER LEVEL: 47 SF36.3' BLOCK AVG. FRONTYARD SETBACKNEIGHBORRETAINING WALL(LESS THAN 30"AS NEEDEDDOUBLE SILTSOCK TOWARDSCREEK904' 903'902'901'LL ELEV @ WALK OUT:895.7' (APPROX)900.5'900.0'899.5'899.0'898.5'898.0'897.5'897.0'896.5'896.0'895.5'900'899'898'897'896'895'RETAINING WALL(AS NEEDED)LANDSCAPE STAIRS ONGRADE (30 SF & 3'-6"FROM PROP. APPROX)PROTECTTREEPROTECTTREE1PROPOSED SITE DIAGRAM(APPROX SCALE) 1/8" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/16" = 1'-0" on 11x17NA01SITE DIAGRAMATW, AMREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.31_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION ZONING SUMMARYZONING DISTRICT: R-1YEAR BUILT: 1935LOT MINIMUMS:75' WIDE x 120' DEEP & 9,000 SFACTUAL: 70' WIDE x ~160' DEEP x 17,396 SFBUILDING COVERAGE: < 25%EXISTING: 2,061 SF HOUSE + 397 SF DECK = 2,458 SF (14.4%)PROPOSED: 3,095 SF HOUSE + 652 DECK = 3,747 SF (21.5%)BUILDING COVERAGE EXCEPTIONS: DECKS AND PATIOSTHE FIRST 150 SQUARE FEET OF AN UNENCLOSED DECK ORPATIO SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED WHEN COMPUTING BUILDINGCOVERAGE.IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT COVERAGE:<50%EXISTING: 2,458 SF BUILDING + 1,185 SF LANDSCAPE = 3,643 SF(20.9%)PROPOSED: 3,747 SF BUILDING + 1,185 SF LANDSCAPE = 4,932SF (28.4%)BUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT YARD: 30'**INTERIOR SIDE YARD: 10'REAR YARD: 50' FROM OHWMSECT. 36-439 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.a. ESTABLISHED FRONT STREET SETBACK. WHEN MORETHAN 25 PERCENT OF THE LOTS ON ONE SIDE OF ASTREET BETWEEN STREET INTERSECTIONS, ON ONESIDE OF A STREET THAT ENDS IN A CUL-DE-SAC, OR ONONE SIDE OF A DEAD-END STREET, ARE OCCUPIED BYDWELLING UNITS, THE FRONT STREET SETBACK FORANY LOT SHALL BE DETERMINED AS FOLLOWS:1. IF THERE IS AN EXISTING DWELLING UNIT ON ANABUTTING LOT ON ONLY ONE SIDE OF THE LOT THATHAS A FRONT STREET SETBACK ON THE SAMESTREET, THE FRONT STREET SETBACKREQUIREMENT SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE FRONTSTREET SETBACK OF THE DWELLING UNIT ON THEABUTTING LOT ON THE SAME STREET; OR THE FRONTSTREET SETBACK SHALL BE THE AVERAGE FRONTSTREET SETBACK OF ALL OTHER DWELLING UNITS ONTHE SAME SIDE OF THAT STREET, BETWEENINTERSECTIONS.2. IF THERE ARE EXISTING DWELLING UNITS ONABUTTING LOTS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE LOT THATBOTH HAVE A FRONT STREET SETBACK ON THE SAMESTREET, THE FRONT STREET SETBACK SHALL BE THEAVERAGE OF THE FRONT STREET SETBACKS OF THEDWELLING UNITS ON THE TWO ABUTTING LOTS ONTHE SAME STREET; OR THE FRONT STREET SETBACKSHALL BE THE AVERAGE FRONT STREET SETBACK OFALL OTHER DWELLING UNITS ON THE SAME SIDE OFTHAT STREET, BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS.BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 12 STORIES (35' PER 80' WIDTH + HPCRULES)MEASURED FROM HIGHEST POINT ON ROOF, SHALL NOTEXCEED 30'. FOR LOTS THAT EXCEED 75' IN WIDTH, THE MAX.HEIGHT SHALL BE 35'+X WHERE X IS EQUAL TO ONE INCH PERFOOT BEYOND 75' LOT WIDTH WITH A MAX. OF 40'.FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT & MCWD PERMIT RULESSECTION 36-1268 - SETBACKS FROM NATURALLY OCCURRINGLAKES, PONDS AND STREAMS. "... ALL PRINCIPAL ANDACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUMSETBACK OF 50 FEET FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH-WATERELEVATION.."FEMA BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: 888.2' -NEED TO STAY 2' ABOVE (890.2') FOR WALK-OUTBASEMENT.-BASEMENT CAN BE UP TO 888.2, BUT NO LOWER.FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION:-ALTERING OR FILLING LAND BELOW THE 100-YEAR HIGHWATER ELEVATION OF A WATER BODYEROSION CONTROL:-EXPOSING 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF SOIL-GRADING, EXCAVATING, FILLING, OR ON-SITE STORING OF 50CUBIC YARDS OF SOILPage 29 of 67 1SITE AERIAL(APPROX SCALE) 1/8" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/16" = 1'-0" on 11x17NX02SITE AERIALGOOGLEREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION Page 30 of 67 N02481EXISTING LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17MEDIAROOMPLAYWINECELLARBATHMECH/STORAGEUNEXCAVATEDUNEXCAVATEDLOWERDECKX10EXISTING LOWERLEVEL PLANATWREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION Page 31 of 67 N02481LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17LOWERLIVING ROOMWINECELLARMECH/STORAGEUNEXCAVATEDSAUNAGOLF SIMQ STUDY ORBEDROOMPATIO3232EXERCISEROOMLL BATH17R UPBAROUTDOORSTORAGEEXERCISESTORAGEBILLIARDS3632303R DN3R DN363636 2R DNUP17R?3017 SF ADDITION (TBDON EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK)LOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST LOWER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (127 SF)EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'EXISTINGREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A10LOWER LEVELPLANML, AWPage 32 of 67 N02481EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17OPEN TOABOVEGARAGEFOYERWCKITCHENNOOKSITTINGROOMDININGROOMLIVINGROOMCLDECK13 DN14 UPNOT MEASURED -VFY DIMENSIONSAS NECESS.R/FDECK BELOWX11EXISTING MAINLEVEL PLANATWREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION Page 33 of 67 N02481MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17GARAGE16'-0"FILL INDROPPEDFLOORRAISESTOOP 6-7"22'-10"TV30DBLOVENS36" REF1 DN1 DN364-SEASONPORCHEXISTINGCORNERTO REMAINUP15RDN17R?TV363636LIVINGROOMKITCHENDININGROOMPANTRYSTUDYENTRYMUDROOMCLOSET CLOSET BENCH WITH HOOKS DN17R?DECK17 SF ADDITION (TBDON EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK)GAS FPEST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'EXISTINGNEW CONSTRUCTIONLANDSCAPESTONE STEPSLOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTMAIN LEVEL EXPANSION OVER 10'-0"SIDE YARD SETBACK (47 SF)REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.31_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A11MAIN LEVELPLANML, AWPage 34 of 67 N02481EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x1714DNKID'S BATHBEDROOM #1BEDROOM #2CLCLCLCLCLCLCLBATHOFFICESTOR.MASTERBEDROOMLAUNDRYMASTERBATHWCWDX12EXISTING UPPERLEVEL PLANATWREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION Page 35 of 67 N02481UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17PRIMARYBEDROOM14 DN32EXISTING BRICKTO REMAIN4'-6" SP 4'-6" SP 5'-1" SP5'-1" SP*7'-6"ISLAND/DRESSER*7'-6"WDLAUNDRYPRIMARYCLOSET*7'-6"*8'-6" ORVAULTED?6'-6" SP BENCHSAFE?*7'-8"STUDYQ6'-6" SP30HOOKSQ 32323032Q303032PRIMARYBATHROOM*8'-6"GUESTBEDROOM*8'-6"GUESTBATH*8'-6"BOYSBEDROOM 13228*7'-10" OR VAULTCEILING FORHIGH WDWSLOPE306'-6" SPCTRLS4'-0"EXISTINGCORNEROF MAINHOUSE6'-6" SP *7'-6"*7'-6"*8'-6"? VFY3032323230BOOKS OR LINENBOOKSBOOKSBOOKS OR LINENSLOPESLOPESLOPE3030 LINENBOYSBEDROOM 2*8'-6"BATHROOM4'-0"HIGH WDW6'-6" SPCHIMNEY17 SF ADDITION (TBDON EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK)EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'EXISTINGNEW CONSTRUCTIONLOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTUPPER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (47 SF)REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.31_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A12UPPER LEVELPLANML, AWPage 36 of 67 N02481EXISTING ROOF PLAN1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17X13EXISTING ROOFPLANATWREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION Page 37 of 67 N024 81ROOF PLAN1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17NEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW COPPERCHIMNEYNEW BRICK CHIMNEY9/129/129/129/129/129/129/129/124/124/12NEW COPPERCHIMNEYEST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'LOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTUPPER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK (47 SF)REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.31_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A13ROOFPLANML, AWPage 38 of 67 N02481ROOF PLAN1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x172173 SF - EXISTING ROOF(SHOWN WITH GRAY)NEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW ROOFNEW COPPERCHIMNEYNEW BRICK CHIMNEY9/129/129/129/129/129/129/129/124/124/12NEW COPPERCHIMNEY47 SF OVER THESETBACK ADDEDEST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'EST. FRONT YARDSETBACK 36.3'REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A13ROOFPLANML, AW666.2 sf34.15 sf177.39 sfTOTALS: EXISTING ROOF TOTAL (TAKEN IN PLAN): 2173 SFTOTAL REMOVED: 878 SF(2173-878 = 1,295 SF REMAINING)1,295/2,173 = 60% ROOF REMAINING IN PLACE EXISTING VS. PROPOSED ROOF DEMO DIAGRAMKEY: EXISTING FOOTPRINT AREA REMOVED ROOF IS BEINGRAISED UP ANDREBUILTPage 39 of 67 912912412912133224456677912912912412ALIGN WDWS WITH EXISTINGHEAD HEIGHT, LARGERDOUBLE HUNGS FOR EGRESS- MATCH PROPORTIONS OFLARGE DOUBLE HUNG ONMAIN LEVELARCHED TOP DOORWITH 6-7" STOOP,SHORTEN BOT. OF COLS1EGRESSEGRESSMAINTAIN HEIGHT & SLOPEOF HIPPED ROOF, SHORTENTO FRONT FACADENEW BRACKET SIMILAR TOSIDE ENTRY BRACKETPAINTED GARAGE DOOR±7"EXISTING BRACKET TOREFERENCE FOR FRONTGARAGE HIPPED ROOF13322445667ADDITION AT REAR THAT"KINKS" INTO VIEWBRICK TO BE PAINTEDCEDAR SHAKE SIDING FORSOLID STAIN10FRONT GARAGE EXPANSIONOVER ESTABLISHED FRONT YARDSETBACK (2'-2" ADDITION) 17SF(ALLOWED UP TO 200SF)ADD.ADDITION 77REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005A20EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING FRONT FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED FRONT FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17N ELEVATION KEYED NOTESGENERAL NOTES: MISC. MATERIAL NOTES NOTLABELED·FRONT DOOR - ASSUME PAINT GRADE·GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS. ASSUME 5"K-STYLE PROFILE FOR GUTTER AND ROUNDDOWNSPOUT·GARAGE DOORS - PANELED FOR PAINT·CHIMNEY - 3" BRICK123SURFACES / FLATWORK:BRICK WET LAID STOOP46ROOF:CEDAR SHAKE ROOF (ALT. ASPHALTSHINGLES)WALLS:CEDAR SHAKE SIDINGBRICK VENEER7810EXTERIOR MILLWORK:WINDOWS AND DOORS: 2-1/4"BRICKMOLD CASING AND 1-1/2"SUBSILL FOR PAINTBRICK SOLIDER COURSE HEADER ANDBRICK SILL AT BRICK LOCATIONS2-PART RAKE & EAVE - 1X6 WITHPROFILE COMPOSITE TRIM BOARDSFOR PAINT,PAINTED PLYWOOD SOFFITSDECORATIVE BRACKETS FOR PAINTPAINTED HARDY PANELING59NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSIONASPHALT ARCHITECTURALSHINGLES TO REPLACECEDAR SHAKE (SLATELINEGAF ASPHALT SHINGLE ORSIMILAR)Page 40 of 67 ±7"1FRONT ENTRY 1" ON 11x17 = 1'-0" 2'01'6"±7'-6" REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW2EXISTING FRONT ENTRY (EXTERIOR)(NTS)3EXISTING FRONT ENTRY (INTERIOR)(NTS)DROPPED ENTRYFLOOR CREATES A"TRIPPER" STAIR ANDDOOR IS FLUSH WITHEXTERIOR GRADEEXISTING FANLIGHTIS BLOCKED BY ASTAIR LANDINGEXISTING ROOFCANOPY TO REMAIN(RE-ROOF AS REQ'D)EXISTING ARCHEDBRICK TO REMAINNEW ARCHED TOPPEDHALF-LITE DOOR,MUNTINS ANDPANELING BELOW FORPAINT. DOOR HEIGHT ISBASED ON KEEPINGEXISTING BRICKHEADER AND BRINGINGUP STOOPSIDE LIGHT WINDOWSTO REMAINNEW BRICK PAVERSTOOPBOTTOM OF COLUMNSARE SHORTENED ANDBASE IS SALVAGEDOR REBUILT TO SAMEDETAILEXISTING DOORIS CLOSE TOGRADEFANLIGHT ISCLOSED OFFPage 41 of 67 9126129122113324546779129121ROOF PORTION ADDEDADDITION (ALLOWED TOCONTINUE NON-CONFORMITYUP TO 200SF WITH OUT AVARIANCE ON BOTH LEVELS)LOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST LOWER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACKADDITION211324476COPPER CHIMNEY3±895.7' @ WALKOUTLOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTMAIN LEVEL EXPANSION OVER 10'-0"SIDE YARD SETBACKLOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTUPPER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACKREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.31_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A21EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING SOUTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17ELEVATION KEYED NOTESGENERAL NOTES: MISC. MATERIAL NOTES NOTLABELED·FRONT DOOR - ASSUME PAINT GRADE·GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS. ASSUME 5"K-STYLE PROFILE FOR GUTTER AND ROUNDDOWNSPOUT·GARAGE DOORS - PANELED FOR PAINT·CHIMNEY - 3" BRICK123SURFACES / FLATWORK:BRICK WET LAID STOOP46ROOF:CEDAR SHAKE ROOF (ALT. ASPHALTSHINGLES)WALLS:CEDAR SHAKE SIDINGBRICK VENEER7810EXTERIOR MILLWORK:WINDOWS AND DOORS: 2-1/4"BRICKMOLD CASING AND 1-1/2"SUBSILL FOR PAINTBRICK SOLIDER COURSE HEADER ANDBRICK SILL AT BRICK LOCATIONS2-PART RAKE & EAVE - 1X6 WITHPROFILE COMPOSITE TRIM BOARDSFOR PAINT,PAINTED PLYWOOD SOFFITSDECORATIVE BRACKETS FOR PAINTPAINTED HARDY PANELING59Page 42 of 67 91291241212323445667912NEW CHIMNEYEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSNEIGHBORSRETAINING WALLON PROPERTYLINE (APPROX.)EGRESSEGRESSEGRESSADDITIONCOPPER CHIMNEYCOPPER CHIMNEY223445667377571199711LOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTMAIN LEVEL EXPANSION OVER 10'-0"SIDE YARD SETBACKLOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTUPPER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACKLOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTLOWER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACKREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.31_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A22EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING WEST FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED WEST FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17N ELEVATION KEYED NOTESGENERAL NOTES: MISC. MATERIAL NOTES NOTLABELED·FRONT DOOR - ASSUME PAINT GRADE·GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS. ASSUME 5"K-STYLE PROFILE FOR GUTTER AND ROUNDDOWNSPOUT·GARAGE DOORS - PANELED FOR PAINT·CHIMNEY - 3" BRICK123SURFACES / FLATWORK:BRICK WET LAID STOOP46ROOF:CEDAR SHAKE ROOF (ALT. ASPHALTSHINGLES)WALLS:CEDAR SHAKE SIDINGBRICK VENEER7810EXTERIOR MILLWORK:WINDOWS AND DOORS: 2-1/4"BRICKMOLD CASING AND 1-1/2"SUBSILL FOR PAINTBRICK SOLIDER COURSE HEADER ANDBRICK SILL AT BRICK LOCATIONS2-PART RAKE & EAVE - 1X6 WITHPROFILE COMPOSITE TRIM BOARDSFOR PAINT,PAINTED PLYWOOD SOFFITSDECORATIVE BRACKETS FOR PAINTPAINTED HARDY PANELING59Page 43 of 67 91291261211232354677766912REMOVE DOORAND STOOPRETAINING WALL -VERIFY912ADDITION1123234467756665REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A23EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING NORTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED NORTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17N ELEVATION KEYED NOTESGENERAL NOTES: MISC. MATERIAL NOTES NOTLABELED·FRONT DOOR - ASSUME PAINT GRADE·GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS. ASSUME 5"K-STYLE PROFILE FOR GUTTER AND ROUNDDOWNSPOUT·GARAGE DOORS - PANELED FOR PAINT·CHIMNEY - 3" BRICK123SURFACES / FLATWORK:BRICK WET LAID STOOP46ROOF:CEDAR SHAKE ROOF (ALT. ASPHALTSHINGLES)WALLS:CEDAR SHAKE SIDINGBRICK VENEER7810EXTERIOR MILLWORK:WINDOWS AND DOORS: 2-1/4"BRICKMOLD CASING AND 1-1/2"SUBSILL FOR PAINTBRICK SOLIDER COURSE HEADER ANDBRICK SILL AT BRICK LOCATIONS2-PART RAKE & EAVE - 1X6 WITHPROFILE COMPOSITE TRIM BOARDSFOR PAINT,PAINTED PLYWOOD SOFFITSDECORATIVE BRACKETS FOR PAINTPAINTED HARDY PANELING59Page 44 of 67 91291261211232354677766EGRESSEGRESSEGRESSMAINTAIN HEIGHT & SLOPEOF HIPPED ROOF, SHORTENTO FRONT FACADENEW BRACKET SIMILAR TOSIDE ENTRY BRACKETROOF EXPANDED FORADDITION AT GARAGE912236IPE TREADS ANDPAINTED RISERSPAINTED WOODRAILINGS WITHMETAL VERTICALS1246777NEW CHIMNEYREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A24EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING NORTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED NORTH FACADE (BEYOND)1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17N ELEVATION KEYED NOTESGENERAL NOTES: MISC. MATERIAL NOTES NOTLABELED·FRONT DOOR - ASSUME PAINT GRADE·GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS. ASSUME 5"K-STYLE PROFILE FOR GUTTER AND ROUNDDOWNSPOUT·GARAGE DOORS - PANELED FOR PAINT·CHIMNEY - 3" BRICK123SURFACES / FLATWORK:BRICK WET LAID STOOP46ROOF:CEDAR SHAKE ROOF (ALT. ASPHALTSHINGLES)WALLS:CEDAR SHAKE SIDINGBRICK VENEER7810EXTERIOR MILLWORK:WINDOWS AND DOORS: 2-1/4"BRICKMOLD CASING AND 1-1/2"SUBSILL FOR PAINTBRICK SOLIDER COURSE HEADER ANDBRICK SILL AT BRICK LOCATIONS2-PART RAKE & EAVE - 1X6 WITHPROFILE COMPOSITE TRIM BOARDSFOR PAINT,PAINTED PLYWOOD SOFFITSDECORATIVE BRACKETS FOR PAINTPAINTED HARDY PANELING59Page 45 of 67 912912412912133224456677912912912412ALIGN WDWS WITH EXISTINGHEAD HEIGHT, LARGERDOUBLE HUNGS FOR EGRESS- MATCH PROPORTIONS OFLARGE DOUBLE HUNG ONMAIN LEVELARCHED TOP DOORWITH 6-7" STOOP,SHORTEN BOT. OF COLS1EGRESSEGRESSMAINTAIN HEIGHT & SLOPEOF HIPPED ROOF, SHORTENTO FRONT FACADENEW BRACKET SIMILAR TOSIDE ENTRY BRACKETPAINTED GARAGE DOOR±7"EXISTING BRACKET TOREFERENCE FOR FRONTGARAGE HIPPED ROOF13322445667ADDITION AT REAR THAT"KINKS" INTO VIEWBRICK TO BE PAINTEDCEDAR SHAKE SIDING FORSOLID STAIN10FRONT GARAGE EXPANSIONOVER ESTABLISHED FRONT YARDSETBACK (2'-2" ADDITION) 17SF(ALLOWED UP TO 200SF)ADD.ADDITION 77REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005A20EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING FRONT FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED FRONT FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION590.24 sf30.72 sf13.63 sf9.04 sf10.19 sf 201.89 sf4.01 sf109.11 sfTOTALS FOR ALL FACADES:EXISTING FACADES: 3,961 SFEAST: 1005 SFSOUTH: 798 SFWEST:1373 SFNORTH: 785 SFPROPOSED WITH REMAINING: 2,492 SFEAST: 1005 SFSOUTH: 719 SFWEST: 24 SFNORTH: 744 SFTOTAL REMAINING: 63% (2,492/3,961)NEW/REBUILTEXISTING TO REMAINREMOVED1,004.86 sf45.79 sfELEVATION DEMO STUDYEXISTING VS PROPOSEDTOTALS: EXISTING ELEVATION TOTAL :1005 SFTOTAL REMOVED: 0 SF100% ELEVATIONSREMAININGPage 46 of 67 9126129122113324546779129121ROOF PORTION ADDEDADDITION (ALLOWED TOCONTINUE NON-CONFORMITYUP TO 200SF WITH OUT AVARIANCE ON BOTH LEVELS)LOCATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST LOWER LEVEL EXPANSION OVER10'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACKADDITION211324476COPPER CHIMNEY3±895.7' @ WALKOUTREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A21EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING SOUTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED SOUTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x17721.5 sf46.25 sf33.2 sf798.43 sfTOTALS: EXISTING ELEVATION TOTAL: 798 SFTOTAL REMOVED: 79 SF(798-79= 716 SF REMAINING)719/798= 90% ELEVATIONSREMAININGNEW/REBUILTEXISTING TO REMAINREMOVEDELEVATION DEMO STUDYEXISTING VS PROPOSEDPage 47 of 67 91291241212323445667912NEW CHIMNEYEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSEGRESSNEIGHBORSRETAINING WALLON PROPERTYLINE (APPROX.)EGRESSEGRESSEGRESSADDITIONCOPPER CHIMNEYCOPPER CHIMNEY223445667377571199711REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A22EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING WEST FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED WEST FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x171,372.93 sfTOTALS: EXISTING ELEVATIONTOTAL : 1,373 SFTOTAL REMOVED: 1348SF(1373-1348= 25 SFREMAINING)25/1373= 2% ELEVATIONSREMAINING1,348.08 sf24.6 sfNEW/REBUILTEXISTING TO REMAINREMOVEDELEVATION DEMO STUDYEXISTING VS PROPOSEDPage 48 of 67 91291261211232354677766912REMOVE DOORAND STOOPRETAINING WALL -VERIFY912ADDITION1123234467756665REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC. 2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410 Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT PHASE:PROJECT NUMBER:KELLY RESIDENCE 4630 EDGEBROOK PLACE EDINA, MN 55424JULY 11, 2025DESIGNDEVELOPMENT25-005NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 2025.07.11_ COA & VARIANCE SUBMISSION A23EXTERIORELEVATIONSML, AW1EXISTING NORTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x172PROPOSED NORTH FACADE1/x" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/x" = 1'-0" on 11x1746.2 sf660.15 sf40.58 sf11.81 sf776.42 sfTOTALS: EXISTING ELEVATIONTOTAL : 785 SFTOTAL REMOVED: 41 SF(785-41= 744 SFREMAINING)744/785= 95% ELEVATIONSREMAINING8.02 sfNEW/REBUILTEXISTING TO REMAINREMOVEDELEVATION DEMO STUDYEXISTING VS PROPOSEDPage 49 of 67 August 12, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner B-25-11, A 3.5-foot side yard setback variance at 4630 Edgebrook Place Information / Background: The property at 4630 Edgebrook Place is a two-story single family residential home located in the Country Club District and built in 1935. The applicant is proposing an addition to the basement, first and second floor off the rear of the existing house to allow for additional garage and living space. The proposed addition off of the rear of the existing house continues off the existing non- conforming wall which is not parallel to the property line. The existing non-conforming side yard setback is 6.6 feet. The proposed addition gets slightly closer to the property line and is proposed to have a setback of 6.5 feet from the side yard property line. The zoning code allows an alternate setback for an addition to a single dwelling unit building with a nonconforming setback. The addition can’t be any closer to the property line, has to be constructed on the same floor as the existing non-conformity, and is allowed an equal amount of non-conformity, up to 200 square feet, whichever is less. The proposed addition gets slightly closer to the property line, therefore the project does not comply with the alternate setback rule on the first and second floors. There currently is living space on the first and second floors that is setback 6.6 feet to the property line. The addition area on the first and second floors gets 1.2 inches closer to the property line and is setback 6.5 feet due to the existing building wall not being parallel to the property line. The first and second floor addition area that is within the required 10-foot setback is approximately 47 square feet per floor. The applicant is also adding living space to the basement. The proposed addition to the basement that is within the required 10-foot setback is approximately 127 square feet. Page 50 of 67 STAFF REPORT Page 2 The proposed project also requires a certificate of appropriateness through the city’s Heritage Preservation Commission. The HPC will review the COA request for changes to the street facing façade at their August 12th HPC meeting. Surrounding Land Uses Single Unit residential homes and a school, zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Planning Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District, Country Club District Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side– Yard East Front – Yard South Side– Yard West Rear– Yard 10 feet 36.3 feet 10 feet (6.6 Existing) 50 feet from OHWE 8.9 feet to existing (existing nonconforming) 16.2 feet to addition 32.6 feet existing (existing nonconforming) *6.5 feet Greater than 50 feet Building Height 30 feet 25 feet Building Coverage Lots greater than 9,000sf Impervious Surface Coverage 25% 50% 18.5% 28.9% First Floor Elevation 905.2 905.2 *Requires a variance Page 51 of 67 STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues/Variance Approval Yes, the proposed variance is justified. Minnesota Statutes and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that a variance shall not be granted unless the following findings are made: The variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. Side yard setbacks have changed since the time when the home was built in 1935. This house was built within the period of significance in the County Club Historic District. Homes built within the period of significance cannot be torn down. It is a common assumption that nonconformity can be continued. In this instance the original house that was built in 1935 was not placed so the building wall was exactly parallel to the property line to allow for the alternate setback standard to apply. The variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property for low density residential, which includes single dwelling units as a primary use. The use of the property will remain a single dwelling unit. Staff finds that the requested variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. There are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. The term “practical difficulties” means the following: i. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds the side yard setback request to be reasonable. Remodeling and adding onto the home is a practical and sustainable solution that is less intrusive to the neighborhood than a tear-down/re-build new home. This house was built within the period of significance in the Country Club District which makes it a contributing resource to the historic neighborhood and its not eligible to be torn down. An addition allows for rehabilitation, which is the preferred treatment for heritage preservation resources in the district. If the original house was situated on the lot so that the building wall was parallel to the property line, the first and second floor of the proposed addition would not require a variance. The proposed living space in the basement is underground and is aligned with the existing building wall on the first and second floor. Page 52 of 67 STAFF REPORT Page 4 ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The existing house has a nonconforming side yard setback and was constructed in 1935 under different setback standards. The first and second floor additions would meet the requirements of the alternate setback clause, but the house is not set parallel to the property line, therefore the addition gets 1.2 inches closer to the property line. If the house was parallel to the property line, the first and second floor of the addition would meet the alternate setback clause. This circumstance is not created by the landowner owner. iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition will maintain the character of the Colonial Revival style house which is important being in the historic Country Club District. Recommended Action: Approval Approve the request for a 3.5-foot side yard setback variance to allow a 6.5-foot setback for an addition at 4630 Edgebrook Place. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The side yard setback practical difficulty is caused by the existing building wall not being parallel to the property line. If the existing wall was parallel to the property line, the first and second floor addition would conform to the alternate setback standards and not require a variance. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The side yard setback variance is reasonable. Remodeling and adding onto the home is a practical solution and allows for rehabilitation, which is the preferred treatment for heritage preservation resources in the Country Club District. 4. There are circumstances that are unique to the subject property. The existing house currently has a nonconforming side yard setback which was a condition of when the house was originally constructed in 1935. 5. The proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed addition will maintain the character of the colonial revival style house located within the historic Country Club District. Any approval is subject to the following conditions: • Subject to plans and survey date stamped July 31, 2025. • Compliance with the tree ordinance. Page 53 of 67 Project Report Better Together Edina 4630 Edgebrook Place Variance 0 comments Page 54 of 67 EdinaMN.gov SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE 4630 Edgebrook Place Page 55 of 67 Site Location Page 56 of 67 Page 57 of 67 Page 58 of 67 Page 59 of 67 Page 60 of 67 Page 61 of 67 Page 62 of 67 Page 63 of 67 Page 64 of 67 Page 65 of 67 Recommendation Approve the request for a 3.5-foot side yard setback variance to allow a 6.5-foot setback for an addition at 4630 Edgebrook Place. Approval is based on the following findings: •The side yard setback practical difficulty is caused by the existing building wall not being parallel to the property line. I f the existing wall was parallel to the property line, the first and second floor addition would conform to the alternate setback standards and n ot require a variance. •The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. •The side yard setback variance is reasonable. Remodeling and adding onto the home is a practical solution and allows for reha bilitation, which is the preferred treatment for heritage preservation resources in the Country Club District. •There are circumstances that are unique to the subject property. The existing house currently has a nonconforming side yard s etback which was a condition of when the house was originally constructed in 1935. •The proposal would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed addition will maintain the character o f the colonial revival style house located within the historic Country Club District. Any approval is subject to the following conditions: •Subject to plans and survey date stamped July 31, 2025. •Compliance with the tree ordinance. Page 66 of 67 Basement Page 67 of 67