HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-09-02 Work Session Meeting Packet
Meeting location:
Edina City Hall
Community Room
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN
City Council Work Session Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, September 2, 2025
5:30 PM Accessibility Support:
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification,
an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Meeting Topics
3.1. Draft Amendments to the Tree Protection Ordinance
3.2. 2026 - 2027 Budget and Preliminary Levy Discussion
4. Adjournment
Page 1 of 35
d
ITEM REPORT
Date: September 2, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion
Meeting: City Council
Agenda Number: 3.1
Prepared By: Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation
Director
Item Type: Other Department: Parks & Recreation
Item Title: Draft Amendments to the Tree Protection Ordinance
Action Requested:
Staff requests feedback from the City Council on making the draft changes to the tree protection
ordinance.
Information/Background:
At the May 7, 2024, Work Session, City staff provided a review of City Ordinance 10-82 for the
Edina City Council and identified several discussion points related to the effectiveness and process for
residential tree protection and preservation since its inception on January 1, 2023. The goal of the
ordinance is to emphasize the protection of trees and to identify the requirements for replacement.
The City Council provided feedback on immediate factors for change and for identifying areas for
consideration and future consideration. That resulted in the adoption of certain updates at the June 4,
2024 regular meeting.
Additional identified items for future updates were discussed at the February 18, 2025 work
session. Staff worked on those aspects and by direction of the City Council presented those updates
to the Energy and Environment Commission for review and accepted their feedback. The Energy and
Environment Commission (EEC) provided feedback on these changes at the July 10, 2025 and August
14, 2025 regular EEC meetings and supported these proposed updates.
A. Factors changed on June 4, 2024
1. Including unbuilt lots shall have a separate exclusion calculation for tree protection.
Applying an exclusion for house, driveway, and related structures for an unbuilt residential lot. An
unbuilt lot is an existing or newly created PID, with a unique address that has not had a primary
residential structure. Staff recommends this change is retroactive to January 1. 2023. This
application would utilize the exemption language from the 2015 version of the tree ordinance for
these permits only. It is anticipated that are a small number of unbuilt lots remaining in Edina and
that this provision will eventually sunset over time or until an alternate process is identified.
Specifically:
1. Protected Trees may be removed without mitigation, in the following areas:
i. Including, and within a ten-foot (10’) radius of, the building pad, deck or patio of a
new building.
ii. Including, and within a five-foot (5’) radius of driveways and parking areas.
iii. Including, and within ten-foot (10’) radius of installation of public infrastructure
improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and utilities.
2. Requiring an ISA Certified Arborist
Currently an ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) Certified Arborist is required to release
the escrow verification at the end of the 12-month period after certificate of occupancy. The City
Page 2 of 35
Council supported the requirement to have a certified arborist at the inception of the process.
Staff recommend this requirement for any new home construction permit above $500,000
(consistent with the affordable housing exemption) and any other permit valuation over $100,000
in estimated value and staff strongly recommends for all project applications. To offset that
requirement staff recommends that an allowance be given for this provision of up to $2,500 of
actual realized arborist costs per permit and that amount would be deducted from the applicant’s
escrow.
B. Identified Updates for City Council Review, supported by EEC
1. Allowances for calculations for steep slope, delineated wetlands, poor soils, utility easements,
etc.
In recognition that there are varying unique circumstances from parcel to parcel, there would be a
provision that would allow staff to reduce replanting requirements by up to 15%. This would
require the applicant to provide official documentation for staff to review by a licensed
professional to attest to the uniqueness being considered. [DRAFT Section 10-82 (7) and (8)]
2. Designating an additional circumstance where protected and heritage trees may be removed
without mitigation on built lots where a tree is posing damage to existing infrastructure, as
attested by a certified licensed professional or by the City Engineer if located in an active
easement or a future needed easement. [DRAFT Section 10-82 (7) a. and b.]
3. Establishing the method and process by which applicants may plant or fund the planting of the
trees in off-site locations, including a canopy connect program. This provision continues to
value protection and if needed replacement as close to the subject property removals and
expands outwardly, and designating any forfeited escrows will be used specifically for the
purpose to replace and protect trees within the city. [DRAFT Section 10-82 (15) and (16)]
4. Including all zoning classifications. The draft changes apply to properties zoned R-1, R-2, and
all PCD, POD, PID, PUD, PRD and MDD Districts. This applies to permits and land use
applications for grading permits, demolition permits, subdivision applications, building permit
applications for principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck or a pool; and
additions to principal and accessory structures. [DRAFT Section 10-82]
Pending future changes to this ordinance or the zoning code update process, a separate Tree
Protection Permit application form may be developed specifically for residential or commercial, of
which the requirements would have the same minimum standards.
5. Expanded definitions of tree sizes and measurement techniques. [DRAFT Section 10-82 (2)
d.] and expanding the replacement ratio from same species type to at least an 80%/20% ratio
to encourage species diversity. [DRAFT Section 10-82 (4) a. and (5) a.]
Summary
Residents of Edina have shown that natural resource management is important to the quality of life in
the community. The City Council has respected that value through its longstanding support of
implementing mechanisms to assist in the protection and management of those resources. This is
evident by the adoption of the Climate Action Plan, Tree Protection Ordinance and support of the
various forestry and land management initiatives that occur on park and public property.
Supporting Documentation:
1. Draft Tree Ordinance Amendments - Redlined Version
2. Draft Tree Ordinance Amendments - Clean Version
3. Advisory Communication EEC to City Staff 08.27.2025
Page 3 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-__
AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING
TREE PROTECTION
The City Council Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 10, Article III of the Edina City Code is amended as follows:
DIVISION III. TREE PROTECTION
Sec. 10-82. Preservation, protection and replacement of Protected Trees.
The council shall have power to provide for, and by ordinance regulate, the setting out and
protection of trees, shrubs, and flowers in the city or upon its property.
This division applies to the following permits and land use applications on properties that
are zoned R-1, and R-2, and all PCD, POD, PID, PUD, PRD and MDD Districts: grading
permits, demolition permits, subdivisions applications, building permit applications for
principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck or a pool; and additions to
principal and accessory structures. This division does not apply to city parkland, which
follows tree protection guidelines outlined in Edina's Comprehensive Plan and City Park
Master Plan.
(1) Purpose. Edina is fortunate to have a robust inventory of mature trees that
form an integral part of the unique character and history of the city, and that
contribute to the long-term aesthetic, environmental, and economic well-being
of the city. The goal of this section is to preserve Edina's high valued trees,
while allowing reasonable development to take place and not interfere with
how existing property owners use their property. The purpose of the
ordinance is to:
a. Preserve and grow Edina's tree canopy cover by protecting mature trees
throughout the city.
b. Protect and enhance property values by conserving and adding to the
distinctive and unique aesthetic character of Edina's tree population.
c. Protect and enhance the distinctive character of Edina's neighborhoods.
d. Improve the quality of life for all stakeholders, including city residents,
visitors and wildlife.
e. Protect the environment by the filtering of air and soil pollutants, increasing
oxygen levels and reducing CO2; preventing and reducing erosion and
stormwater by stabilizing soils; reducing heat convection; decreasing wind
speeds; reducing noise pollution and decreasing the urban heat island effect.
f. Protect and maintain healthy trees in the development and building permit
processes as set forth herein; and prevent tree loss by eliminating or
reducing compacted fill and excavation near tree roots.
g. To prevent the damage or loss of trees
(2) Definitions:
Page 4 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
2
a. Protected tree: Any tree that is structurally sound and healthy, and that meets
one of the following:
i. A deciduous tree that is at least five inches dbh, except box elders,
poplar, willow, silver maple, black locust, fruit tree species, ash, and
mulberry.
ii. A coniferous tree that is at least 15 feet in height.
b. Removable Non-protected tree.
i. Any tree not defined as a protected or heritage tree, and or;
ii. as dDefined as an invasive species by the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources.
c. Critical root zone. The minimum area around a tree that is left undisturbed.
The critical root radius is calculated by measuring the tree's diameter at
breast height. For each inch of tree diameter, one and one-half feet of root
zone radius must be protected. For example, if a tree's dbh is ten inches,
then its critical root zone radius is 15 feet (10 × 1.5 = 15). If the critical root
zone of a tree on site or an adjacent property must be disturbed for
construction or construction activity, a plan for the disturbance shall be
submitted as part of the tree protection plan subject to review and approval
of the city forester to minimize the damage.
d. Tree size: The size of any existing tree or newly planted tree is based of the
tree type.
i. Existing Deciduous trees are to be measured using Diameter at breast
height (dbh). The dbh shall be measured at a height of four and six-
tenths feet.four and a half feet.
ii. Existing Coniferous trees are to be measured using height in feet
from the base of the tree to the mid-point of the tallest whorl.
iii. Replacement Deciduous trees are to be measured using the ANSI
Z60; single stem trees measured at 6 inches above ground level.
Multi-stem trees are to be measured by half of the 3 largest stems.
i.iv. Replacement Coniferous trees are to be measured by feet in height
from the base of the tree to the mid-point of the tallest whorl.
e. Transplanted tree. A protected tree which is removed from a lot and
replanted to another private lot or a public space in Edina.
f. Heritage tree. A protected deciduous tree above 30 inches dbh and a
protected coniferous tree taller than 30 feet.
g. Unbuilt Lot: An existing or newly created lot, with a unique address that has
not had a primary residential structure.
h. Certified Professional. A certified professional holds a current and valid license
or certification as listed on the AELSLAGID (Architecture, Engineering Land
Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience and Interior Design)
registry. Only credentialed architects, engineers, landscape architects,
Geoscience or ISA Certified Arborists will be accepted for providing official
documentation attesting to the uniqueness being considered in section 10-
82 (7) and (8).
(3) Applications for all permit types identified in section 10-82 must include a tree
protection plan indicating where protected and heritage trees are located and,
their species, caliper, and health. The plan must show how protected and
heritage trees are preserved and protected during construction. The plan must
Page 5 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
3
also show if any protected or heritage trees are proposed to be removed and
the location, species and size of all replacement tree(s). The tree protection
plan should be coordinated with the stormwater management plan if required;
proposed and protected trees should be shown on the stormwater
management plan to ensure no conflicts. If the critical root zone of a tree on
site or an adjacent property must be disturbed for construction or construction
activity, a plan for the disturbance shall be submitted as part of the tree
protection plan subject to review and approval of the city forester to minimize
the damage.
(4) If a protected tree is removed, it must be replaced with trees equal to at least
75 percent of the deciduous dbh and 75 percent of the coniferous height in feet,
as applicable, subject to the following conditions:
a. Protected trees must be replaced with species of a similar type (deciduous
or coniferous) Protected coniferous trees must be replaced with similar
species using to at least an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees
must be coniferous species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of
differentdeciduous species according to Part (11) that are normally found
growing in similar conditions and that are included in Hennepin County's
"Recommended Tree List."
b. Protected deciduous trees must be replaced with similar species using at
least an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees must be deciduous
species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of coniferous species that
are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in
Hennepin County's "Recommended Tree List."
bc. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or
infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are
allowed.
cd. Replacement trees must be at least three and one-half inches in caliper for
deciduous trees and a minimum of eight feet tall for coniferous trees.
de. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the city forester before
implementation.
ef. The tree protection plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for
the building permit.
fg. Failure to replace protected trees on site results in an escrow payment fee
of $300.00 per dbh below 75 percent of the dbh removed, or $300.00 per
coniferous foot below 75 percent of the foot removed.
(5) If a heritage tree is removed, it must be replaced with protected trees at least
100 percent of the dbh or coniferous feet, subject to the following conditions:
a. Heritage trees must be replaced with species of a similar type (deciduous or
coniferous) Heritage coniferous trees must be replaced with similar species
using at least an 80/20 ratio, meaning. 80% of replacement trees must be
coniferous species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of
differentdeciduous species that are normally found growing in similar
conditions and that are included in Hennepin County's recommended tree
list “Recommended Tree List” (xlsx).
b. Heritage deciduous trees must be replaced with similar species using at least
an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees must be deciduous
Page 6 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
4
species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of coniferous species that
are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in
Hennepin County's “Recommended Tree List”
bc. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or
infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are
allowed.
cd. Replacement trees must be at least four and one-half inches in caliper for
deciduous trees and a minimum of ten feet tall for coniferous trees.
de. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the city forester before
implementation.
ef. The tree protection plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for
the building permit. If the protection plan is not in compliance, the
inspection may not be approved.
fg. Failure to replace heritage trees results in an escrow payment fee of
$500.00 per deciduous dbh below 100 percent of the dbh removed, and as
applicable, $500.00 per coniferous foot below 100 percent of the coniferous
feet removed.
(6) Protected and Heritage Trees may be removed without mitigation on unbuilt
lots as defined above, in the following areas:
a. Including, and within a ten-foot (10’) radius of, the building pad, deck or
patio.
b. Including, and within a five-foot (5’) radius of driveways.
c. Including, and within ten-foot (10’) radius of installation of infrastructure
improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and
utilities.
(7) Additional circumstances where Protected and Heritage trees may be removed
without mitigation on built lots:
a. Trees posing damage to existing foundations, sidewalks, driveways, subject to
findings from a certified professional as defined in Section 10-82 (2) h.
b. Trees located in an active easement or easement with a future need as
identified by the City Engineer.
(8) The Parks Director, or Community Development Director, or a designee
approved by the City Manager, may reduce replanting requirements by up to
15% for unique circumstances related to: utility easements, setbacks from public
infrastructure, , steep slopes as defined in Sec 32-130, flood risk, or other non-
Page 7 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
5
monetary site circumstance. To consider this reduction, city staff may require a
certified professional or an ISA certified arborist as defined in Section 10-82 (2)
h. to present official documentation attesting to the uniqueness being
considered.
(7)(9) The Tree Survey for any new home construction permit above $500,000 and
or any other permits that are not new home construction with a project
valuation over $100,000 in estimated value is required to be completed by an
ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) Certified Arborist. An allowance
shall be given to the applicant up to $2,500 for the costs of the Arborist and
that amount would be deducted from the applicant's escrow.
(8) (10) Before construction, grading or land clearing begins; city-approved tree
protection fencing, or other method must be installed and maintained at the
critical root zones of the trees to be protected. The location of the fencing
must be in conformance with the approved tree protection plan. The fencing
must be inspected by city staff before site work begins. The fencing must remain
in place until all demolition and construction is complete.
(9) (11) No construction, compaction, construction access, stock piling of earth,
storage of equipment or building materials, or grading may occur within the
critical root zone areas of trees to be protected, unless there are no other on-
site alternatives. If there are no other alternatives, a plan for this activity would
need to be reviewed and approved by the city forester and included in the tree
protection plan. A reasonable effort must be made when trenching utility lines
to avoid the critical root zone.
(10) (12) When construction is complete all trees to remain must have the soil out
to their drip line aerated and de-compacted. Aerating must include multiple
concentric circles of one-inch holes, two inches deep, or as recommended by
an arborist.
(11) (13) If protected trees and/or heritage trees were removed within one year
prior to the date the development, subdivision application, demolition, grading
and building permit applications were submitted, these protected trees and/or
heritage trees are also subject to the replacement policy set forth in paragraphs
(4) and (5) above.
(12) (14) Any tree transplanted on-site shall not be counted as a protected tree or
heritage tree under this section and therefore does not require replacement
under this section, provided it is viable at 12 months after the permit's final
inspection per Part (12).
Page 8 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
6
(13) (14) Amount of required replacement trees in (4) and (5) above shall be a
variety of types and sizes as demonstrated below. Species shall comply with
Hennepin County's "Recommended Tree List."
(14) (15) Tree replacement may be fulfilled by planting trees at a different site from
their home subject property. The different site can be private or public land, at
the choice of the City staff. City staff controls where and when the planting will
happen and the species of the trees that will be plantedFollowing below is the
preferred method of replanting progression.
a) Applicant preserves existing trees on the subject property
b) If preservation is not possible, Applicant plants replacement trees on-site
c) If meeting the full planting requirements on-site is not possible, Applicant
either follows the Written notification letter guidelines as set in Chapter 10
Article IV. Section 10-110 (5) or sends written notification to all properties
within 300 feet of the perimeter of the subject property notifying property
owners that trees are available to be planted at-no-cost on a first come, first
served basis.
1. At no point may the Applicant attempt to obtain compensation from the
accepting party in exchange for planting replacement trees.
2. Once planted, the accepting party is responsible for ensuring the viability
of the tree for one year post planting.
d) If on-site planting is not possible, and no adjacent property owner within
300 feet is interested, Applicant plants replacement trees on private
property, with preference given to properties as close as possible to the
subject property
1. To facilitate this, the City will create a “Canopy Connect” database of
residents interested in planting trees on their property, including name,
address, and relevant contact information of residents willing to
consider tree planting on their property.
2. At no point may the Applicant attempt to obtain compensation from the
accepting party in exchange for planting replacement trees.
3. Once planted, the accepting party is responsible for ensuring the viability
of the tree for one year post planting.
e) If all previous options are not possible, the City uses the escrow for tree
planting and preservation
Deciduous (dbh) Coniferous (in feet) Lot size<1 acre Lot size>/=1 acre
3½” or greater 8’ or greater 70% 50%
4½” or greater 10’ or greater 20% 25%
5½” or greater 12’ or greater 10% 25%
Page 9 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
7
1. City Owned Public property may not be an option due to limited
capacity.
2. At no point may the developer attempt to obtain compensation from
the City in exchange for planting replacement trees.
3. Once planted, the City is responsible for ensuring the viability of the
tree for one year post planting.
(15) (16)Financial Guarantee.
a) The city shallmay, at its option, require cash escrow or a letter of credit
satisfactory to the city in the amount of 110 percent of the value of the tree
replacement identified in the tree protection plan, securing the full performance of
tree protection plan. The amount of such security shall be calculated by the
feesusing the process described in Parts (4)f and (5)f.
b) Release of financial guarantee. The financial security shall be released based on the
following schedule:
I. Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building permit final, the city
forester shall inspect the site using the submitted escrow release form that
includes the updated tree planting plan. Upon determining compliance and
approval by city forester that the tree protection plan has been met : forester
will inspect the site and calculate actual fee owed based on how much dbh
preserved or replaced on siteT50 percent of the original escrow or line of
credit, minus this fee, is 50 percent released at this time. If the planting plan is
not in compliance the 50 percent escrow will be reduced by the amount not
in compliance.
II. Twelve months after issuance of certificate of occupancy or building permit
final, an applicant must submit the escrow release form including a landscape
review by a certified arborist, indicating planted and preserved trees are still
healthy. If any trees are found to be unhealthy, the certified arborist can
replace these trees onsite. and the balance of the financial guarantee (50
percent of financial guarantee net of fees in Part a) are released at this timeIf
the planting plan is not in compliance the balance of the financial guarantee
will be reduced by the amount not in compliance. The balance of the financial
guarantee are released at this time..
II.III. If the applicant does not opt to replace trees onsitein Part (15), this amount is
considered owed to the city and retained forfeited permanently for the
purpose to replace and protect trees within the city.
Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediatelyJanuary 1, 2026.
First Reading:
Page 10 of 35
Existing text – XXXX
Stricken text – XXXX
Added text – XXXX
8
Second Reading:
Published:
ATTEST:
__________________________ _____________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication.
Bill to Edina City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of _____, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2025.
________________________________
City Clerk
Page 11 of 35
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-__
AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING
TREE PROTECTION
The City Council Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 10, Article III of the Edina City Code is amended as follows:
DIVISION III. TREE PROTECTION
Sec. 10-82. Preservation, protection and replacement of Protected Trees.
The council shall have power to provide for, and by ordinance regulate, the setting out and
protection of trees, shrubs, and flowers in the city or upon its property.
This division applies to the following permits and land use applications on properties that
are zoned R-1, R-2, and all PCD, POD, PID, PUD, PRD and MDD Districts: grading
permits, demolition permits, subdivisions applications, building permit applications for
principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck or a pool; and additions to
principal and accessory structures. This division does not apply to city parkland, which
follows tree protection guidelines outlined in Edina's Comprehensive Plan and City Park
Master Plan.
(1) Purpose. Edina is fortunate to have a robust inventory of mature trees that
form an integral part of the unique character and history of the city, and that
contribute to the long-term aesthetic, environmental, and economic well-being
of the city. The goal of this section is to preserve Edina's high valued trees,
while allowing reasonable development to take place and not interfere with
how existing property owners use their property. The purpose of the
ordinance is to:
a. Preserve and grow Edina's tree canopy cover by protecting mature trees
throughout the city.
b. Protect and enhance property values by conserving and adding to the
distinctive and unique aesthetic character of Edina's tree population.
c. Protect and enhance the distinctive character of Edina's neighborhoods.
d. Improve the quality of life for all stakeholders, including city residents,
visitors and wildlife.
e. Protect the environment by the filtering of air and soil pollutants, increasing
oxygen levels and reducing CO2; preventing and reducing erosion and
stormwater by stabilizing soils; reducing heat convection; decreasing wind
speeds; reducing noise pollution and decreasing the urban heat island effect.
f. Protect and maintain healthy trees in the development and building permit
processes as set forth herein; and prevent tree loss by eliminating or
reducing compacted fill and excavation near tree roots.
g. To prevent the damage or loss of trees
(2) Definitions:
Page 12 of 35
2
a. Protected tree: Any tree that is structurally sound and healthy, and that meets
one of the following:
i. A deciduous tree that is at least five inches dbh, except box elders,
poplar, willow, silver maple, black locust, fruit tree species, ash, and
mulberry.
ii. A coniferous tree that is at least 15 feet in height.
b. Non-protected tree.
i. Any tree not defined as a protected or heritage tree, or;
ii. Defined as an invasive species by the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources.
c. Critical root zone. The minimum area around a tree that is left undisturbed.
The critical root radius is calculated by measuring the tree's diameter at
breast height. For each inch of tree diameter, one and one-half feet of root
zone radius must be protected. For example, if a tree's dbh is ten inches,
then its critical root zone radius is 15 feet (10 × 1.5 = 15).
d. Tree size: The size of any existing tree or newly planted tree is based of the
tree type.
i. Existing Deciduous trees are to be measured using Diameter at breast
height (dbh). The dbh shall be measured at a height of four and a half
feet.
ii. Existing Coniferous trees are to be measured using height in feet
from the base of the tree to the mid-point of the tallest whorl.
iii. Replacement Deciduous trees are to be measured using the ANSI
Z60; single stem trees measured at 6 inches above ground level.
Multi-stem trees are to be measured by half of the 3 largest stems.
iv. Replacement Coniferous trees are to be measured by feet in height
from the base of the tree to the mid-point of the tallest whorl.
e. Transplanted tree. A protected tree which is removed from a lot and
replanted to another private lot or a public space in Edina.
f. Heritage tree. A protected deciduous tree above 30 inches dbh and a
protected coniferous tree taller than 30 feet.
g. Unbuilt Lot: An existing or newly created lot, with a unique address that has
not had a primary residential structure.
h. Certified Professional. A certified professional holds a current and valid license
or certification as listed on the AELSLAGID (Architecture, Engineering Land
Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience and Interior Design)
registry. Only credentialed architects, engineers, landscape architects,
Geoscience or ISA Certified Arborists will be accepted for providing official
documentation attesting to the uniqueness being considered in section 10-
82 (7) and (8).
(3) Applications for all permit types identified in section 10-82 must include a tree
protection plan indicating where protected and heritage trees are located and,
their species, caliper, and health. The plan must show how protected and
heritage trees are preserved and protected during construction. The plan must
also show if any protected or heritage trees are proposed to be removed and
the location, species and size of all replacement tree(s). The tree protection
plan should be coordinated with the stormwater management plan if required;
proposed and protected trees should be shown on the stormwater
Page 13 of 35
3
management plan to ensure no conflicts. If the critical root zone of a tree on
site or an adjacent property must be disturbed for construction or construction
activity, a plan for the disturbance shall be submitted as part of the tree
protection plan subject to review and approval of the city forester to minimize
the damage.
(4) If a protected tree is removed, it must be replaced with trees equal to at least
75 percent of the deciduous dbh and 75 percent of the coniferous height in feet,
as applicable, subject to the following conditions:
a. Protected coniferous trees must be replaced with similar species using at
least an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees must be coniferous
species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of deciduous species that
are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in
Hennepin County's "Recommended Tree List."
b. Protected deciduous trees must be replaced with similar species using at
least an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees must be deciduous
species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of coniferous species that
are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in
Hennepin County's "Recommended Tree List."
c. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or
infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are
allowed.
d. Replacement trees must be at least three and one-half inches in caliper for
deciduous trees and a minimum of eight feet tall for coniferous trees.
e. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the city forester before
implementation.
f. The tree protection plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for
the building permit.
g. Failure to replace protected trees on site results in an escrow of $300.00
per dbh below 75 percent of the dbh removed, or $300.00 per coniferous
foot below 75 percent of the foot removed.
(5) If a heritage tree is removed, it must be replaced with protected trees at least
100 percent of the dbh or coniferous feet, subject to the following conditions:
a. Heritage coniferous trees must be replaced with similar species using at
least an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees must be coniferous
species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of deciduous species that
are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in
Hennepin County's “Recommended Tree List”).
b. Heritage deciduous trees must be replaced with similar species using at least
an 80/20 ratio, meaning 80% of replacement trees must be deciduous
species and up to 20% replacement trees may be of coniferous species that
are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included in
Hennepin County's “Recommended Tree List”
c. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or
infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are
allowed.
d. Replacement trees must be at least four and one-half inches in caliper for
deciduous trees and a minimum of ten feet tall for coniferous trees.
Page 14 of 35
4
e. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the city forester before
implementation.
f. The tree protection plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for
the building permit. If the protection plan is not in compliance, the
inspection may not be approved.
g. Failure to replace heritage trees results in an escrow of $500.00 per
deciduous dbh below 100 percent of the dbh removed, and as applicable,
$500.00 per coniferous foot below 100 percent of the coniferous feet
removed.
(6) Protected and Heritage Trees may be removed without mitigation on unbuilt
lots as defined above, in the following areas:
a. Including, and within a ten-foot (10’) radius of, the building pad, deck or
patio.
b. Including, and within a five-foot (5’) radius of driveways.
c. Including, and within ten-foot (10’) radius of installation of infrastructure
improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and
utilities.
(7) Additional circumstances where Protected and Heritage trees may be removed
without mitigation on built lots:
a. Trees posing damage to existing foundations, sidewalks, driveways, subject to
findings from a certified professional as defined in Section 10-82 (2) h.
b. Trees located in an active easement or easement with a future need as
identified by the City Engineer.
(8) The Parks Director, or Community Development Director, or a designee
approved by the City Manager, may reduce replanting requirements by up to
15% for unique circumstances related to: utility easements, setbacks from public
infrastructure, steep slopes as defined in Sec 32-130, flood risk, or other non-
monetary site circumstance. To consider this reduction, city staff may require a
certified professional or an ISA certified arborist as defined in Section 10-82 (2)
h. to present official documentation attesting to the uniqueness being
considered.
(9) The Tree Survey for any new home construction permit above $500,000 or any
other permits that are not new home construction with a project valuation
over $100,000 in estimated value is required to be completed by an ISA
(International Society of Arboriculture) Certified Arborist. An allowance shall
be given to the applicant up to $2,500 for the costs of the Arborist and that
amount would be deducted from the applicant's escrow.
(10) Before construction, grading or land clearing begins; city-approved tree
protection fencing, or other method must be installed and maintained at the
critical root zones of the trees to be protected. The location of the fencing
must be in conformance with the approved tree protection plan. The fencing
Page 15 of 35
5
must be inspected by city staff before site work begins. The fencing must remain
in place until all demolition and construction is complete.
(11) No construction, compaction, construction access, stock piling of earth, storage
of equipment or building materials, or grading may occur within the critical root
zone areas of trees to be protected, unless there are no other on-site
alternatives. If there are no other alternatives, a plan for this activity would
need to be reviewed and approved by the city forester and included in the tree
protection plan. A reasonable effort must be made when trenching utility lines
to avoid the critical root zone.
(12) When construction is complete all trees to remain must have the soil out to
their drip line aerated and de-compacted. Aerating must include multiple
concentric circles of one-inch holes, two inches deep, or as recommended by
an arborist.
(13) If protected trees and/or heritage trees were removed within one year prior to
the date the development, subdivision application, demolition, grading and
building permit applications were submitted, these protected trees and/or
heritage trees are also subject to the replacement policy set forth in paragraphs
(4) and (5) above.
(14) Any tree transplanted on-site shall not be counted as a protected tree or
heritage tree under this section and therefore does not require replacement
under this section, provided it is viable at 12 months after the permit's final
inspection per Part (12).
(15) Tree replacement may be fulfilled by planting trees at a different site from their
subject property. Following below is the preferred method of replanting
progression.
a) Applicant preserves existing trees on the subject property
b) If preservation is not possible, Applicant plants replacement trees on-site
c) If meeting the full planting requirements on-site is not possible, Applicant
either follows the Written notification letter guidelines as set in Chapter 10
Article IV. Section 10-110 (5) or sends written notification to all properties
within 300 feet of the perimeter of the subject property notifying property
owners that trees are available to be planted at-no-cost on a first come, first
served basis.
1. At no point may the Applicant attempt to obtain compensation from the
accepting party in exchange for planting replacement trees.
2. Once planted, the accepting party is responsible for ensuring the viability
of the tree for one year post planting.
d) If on-site planting is not possible, and no adjacent property owner within
300 feet is interested, Applicant plants replacement trees on private
property, with preference given to properties as close as possible to the
subject property
1. To facilitate this, the City will create a “Canopy Connect” database of
residents interested in planting trees on their property, including name,
Page 16 of 35
6
address, and relevant contact information of residents willing to
consider tree planting on their property.
2. At no point may the Applicant attempt to obtain compensation from the
accepting party in exchange for planting replacement trees.
3. Once planted, the accepting party is responsible for ensuring the viability
of the tree for one year post planting.
e) If all previous options are not possible, the City uses the escrow for tree
planting and preservation
1. City Owned Public property may not be an option due to limited
capacity.
2. At no point may the developer attempt to obtain compensation from
the City in exchange for planting replacement trees.
3. Once planted, the City is responsible for ensuring the viability of the
tree for one year post planting.
(16) Financial Guarantee.
a) The city may, at its option, require cash escrow or a letter of credit satisfactory to
the city in the amount of 110 percent of the value of the tree replacement
identified in the tree protection plan, securing the full performance of tree
protection plan. The amount of such security shall be calculated using the process
described in Parts (4)f and (5)f.
b) Release of financial guarantee. The financial security shall be released based on the
following schedule:
I. Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or building permit final, the city
forester shall inspect the site using the submitted escrow release form that
includes the updated tree planting plan. Upon determining compliance and
approval by city forester that the tree protection plan has been met 50
percent of the original escrow or line of credit is released at this time. If the
planting plan is not in compliance the 50 percent escrow will be reduced by
the amount not in compliance.
II. Twelve months after issuance of certificate of occupancy or building permit
final, an applicant must submit the escrow release form including a landscape
review by a certified arborist, indicating planted and preserved trees are still
healthy. If any trees are found to be unhealthy, the certified arborist can
replace these trees onsite. If the planting plan is not in compliance the balance
of the financial guarantee will be reduced by the amount not in compliance.
The balance of the financial guarantee are released at this time.
III. If the applicant does not opt to replace trees in Part (15), this amount is
considered owed to the city and forfeited permanently for the purpose to
replace and protect trees within the city.
Section 2. This ordinance is effective January 1, 2026.
Page 17 of 35
7
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
ATTEST:
__________________________ _____________________________
Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication.
Bill to Edina City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of _____, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2025.
________________________________
City Clerk
Page 18 of 35
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
6. SUPPORT WITH RECOMMENDED EDITS
1) SUPPORT Homeowner preserves existing trees on the subject property
2) SUPPORT If preservation is not possible, developer plants replacement trees on-site
3) ADDED If on-site planting is not possible, developer follows the “demolition letter” procedure
to all property owners within 300 feet of the site notifying them of their ability to have trees
planted at-no-cost on a first come, first served basis.
a. The adjacent property owners have 15 days from the date of the postmark to reply.
b. At no point may the developer attempt to obtain remuneration from the adjacent
property owners in exchange for planting replacement trees.
c. Once planted, the owner of the property where the tree is placed is responsible for
ensuring the viability of the tree.
4) SUPPORT WITH RECOMMENDED EDITS If on-site planting is not possible, and no adjacent
property owner within 300 feet is interested, developer plants replacement trees on private
property, with preference given to properties as close as possible to the subject property
a. To facilitate this, the City will create a “Canopy Connect” database of residents
interested in planting trees on their property, including name, address, email, and phone
numbers of residents willing to consider tree planting on their property.
b. At no point may the developer attempt to obtain remuneration from the adjacent
property owners in exchange for planting replacement trees.
c. Once planted, the owner of the property where the tree is placed is responsible for
ensuring the viability of the tree.
5) SUPPORT WITH RECOMMENDED EDITS If all previous options are not possible, the City uses
the escrow for tree planting and preservation fund
a. City Owned Public property may not an option due to limited capacity.
Date: August 27, 2025
To: Matthew Gaab, Sustainability Specialist
From: Energy and Environment Commission
Subject: Feedback to staff on Tree Protection Ordinance
Recommendation:
In general, staff have provided a careful review of the tree protection ordinance and have proposed
modifications that will ensure the efficacy of the ordinance will continue. We support the staff suggested
changes and provide the following specific feedback, including ideas for further improvement designed to
provide residents and contractors additional constructive guidance and options for compliance.
Page 19 of 35
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
b. At no point may the developer attempt to obtain remuneration from the City in
exchange for planting replacement trees.
c. Once planted, the City is responsible for ensuring the viability of the tree.
7. SUPPORT WITH RECOMMENDED EDITS
- The “licensed professional” clauses are too vague; recommend either providing a list of
professionals whose opinion would be considered usable or providing an ‘e.g.’ list indicative of
the same.
- We are concerned that a less-than-scrupulous reading of these types of exemptions by city staff
would allow for overuse of the “exemption” option. The concern does not lie with the current
staff who are tasked with enforcing the Tree Protection Ordinance, however ordinances must
be written to provide as much clarity as possible regardless of the scruples of those serving
enforcement. We suggest firming up any exemptions to require a specific set of steps that would
minimize ambiguity and therefore minimize pressure on current and future staff to bend the
rules.
8. SUPPORT – EEC supports the same for same threshold at 80%.
9. SUPPORT – EEC supports providing a specific standard for measurement.
10. SUPPORT – EEC supports including the additional zoning districts in the ordinance.
11. SUPPORT – EEC supports keeping the existing size thresholds for protection. During the ordinance
development period, staff and EEC performed comprehensive research on peer municipalities and
ordinances and found that the current size thresholds are aligned with peers with tree protection
ordinances.
Page 20 of 35
Changes to Tree Ordinance Already Implemented
The following changes were approved by City Council and adopted into the Ordinance June 4th 2024:
Topic Discussion Ordinance Changes
1. Chapter 10 Zoning
Clarification
Specify which specific zoned
properties are to be compliant
under the ordinance
The language for properties Zoned R-1 and R-2 (residential) was added
to the ordinance.
2. Exemptions for heavily
wooded lots
Establish unbuilt lots with
exemptions for tree removal or
alleviate burden.
The definition of an Unbuilt lot was added to the ordinance. With
exemptions for any tree to be removed without mitigation within specific
parameters.
3. Developers use of a
Certified Arborist
Require developers at certain
permit valuation to have an
Arborist complete the tree
inventory. This helps lessens
the discussions about what a
healthy tree is.
Any New Home permit with valuation over $500,000 or any project
over $100,000 is required to have an ISA Certified arborist complete the
tree survey and inventory. A credit up to $2,500 will be given to the
applicant for the cost of the arborist.
4. Replacement
requirements On-site
Allow for tree replacements
requirements to be met with
off-site planting
With approval for City Staff, tree replacements may be fulfilled by
planting off-site from the subject property.
5. Reduce Escrow holding
time
Reduce the 36-month escrow
release date
A reduction to 12 months after the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the second half of the escrow release was changed in the
ordinance.
Page 21 of 35
Changes To Discuss with Edina Energy and Environment Commission for Amending Tree Ordinance
Discussion Topic Update Goal Staff Recommendation
6. Creation of Off Site
Planting Guidelines
Prescribe goals for off-site
planting priorities.
Prioritize preserving existing trees or planting on-site, with the following
priorities for off-site planting:
1) Homeowner preserves existing trees on the subject property
2) If preservation is not possible, developer plants replacement trees
on-site
3) If on-site planting is not possible, developer plants replacement
trees on private property, as close as possible to the subject
property
a. To facilitate this, the City will create a “Canopy Connect”
database of residents interested in planting trees on their
property
4) If all previous options are not possible, the City uses the escrow
for tree planting and preservation fund
a. City Owned Public property may not an option due to
limited capacity.
7. Define exemptions for
unique circumstances
Recognize and define what a
unique circumstance that
would warrant “exemption”
from ordinance
Exemptions to be included in ordinance:
1) Existing trees causing current damage to existing structures (e.g.,
building foundation, public street or sidewalk). Damages would
need to be verified and documented by a licensed professional.
2) “Unique Circumstance Exemptions” to be verified and
documented by a licensed professional include these Unique
Circumstances and would be based upon the subject property,
and would limit the homeowner’s ability to meet tree
replacement requirements:
a. Steep slopes: Slopes equal to or steeper than three feet
horizontal to one Foot vertical (3:1)
b. Utility Easements, both public and private
c. Potential flood risk areas as indicated in the storm water
management plan
Page 22 of 35
Update Timeline:
July 10, 2025 – EEC Discussion and Comments
August 14, 2025 – EEC Discussion and Recommendation
September 2, 2025 – City Council Review
Staff would have the ability to verify the above exemptions and deviate up
to 15% of replanting requirements to be reduced.
8. Species Specific
Replanting Ratio
Requirements
Allow for deviation in species
type from “same for same”
planting to meet requirements.
To promote species diversity at least 80% of the replacements must be
similar species types (e.g., “same for same”) and the remaining 20% of
replacement requirements can be met with planting different tree types.
9. Measuring
Methodology
Select a particular methodology
to be applied universally.
Measuring Existing trees: DBH as defined by the MN DNR
Measuring New trees: ANSI Standards Z60.,
This will be laid out in the ordinance and difference with these references.
10. Property Classification
Zoning Application
Incorporate the other property
types into the ordinance -
commercial, etc.
Amend Edina City Code to include additional zoning districts (PCD, POD,
PID, PUD, PRD and MDD).
11. DBH Threshold for
calculating removals
Size threshold exemptions of
tree DBH for counting
Staff recommends keeping at 5 inches and 15 feet. This change was made
by EEC for the 2023 ordinance to account for the loss of smaller but
equally beneficial trees.
Page 23 of 35
d
ITEM REPORT
Date: September 2, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion
Meeting: City Council
Agenda Number: 3.2
Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager
Item Type: Other Department: Finance
Item Title: 2026 - 2027 Budget and Preliminary Levy Discussion
Action Requested:
Discussion only
Information/Background:
The City Manager and staff will provide Council Members with preliminary budget projections for
2026 - 2027. This is a continuation of series of budget discussions with Council Members in advance
of the preliminary levy approval on September 16, 2025 and, ultimately, approval of the final levy
before the end of December 2025.
Supporting Documentation:
1. Staff Report
2. Staff Presentation
3. Unfunded Request for Additional Resources
Page 24 of 35
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Following up on feedback from Council at the last work session, I am pleased to provide additional
clarity on the 2026–2027 biennial budget proposal. This memo outlines the specific reductions made to
the General Fund and provides further explanation regarding the proposed staffing levels for
Paramedic/Firefighters.
General Fund Reductions
In response to Council’s directive to reduce the projected budget, staff conducted a thorough review of
all service areas and funding strategies. The General Fund made up approximately $1,300,000 of the
proposed changes from previous projections. The following changes were made to the General Fund:
$500,000 reduction by transitioning Assessing services to Hennepin County in July 2026.
$85,000 reduction in mill and overlay expenses.
$250,000 reduction for Comprehensive Plan update, as we identified an alternative funding
source for this initiative.
$83,600 reduction of one mechanic position.
Remaining reductions were achieved incrementally through department prioritization and reductions
largely in supplies and professional services. There will likely be reduced number and slower speed for
projects as there will be a greater reliance on internal staff with already established workloads and
capacity to accomplish tasks. Other cost savings were achieved by auditing services, reducing the
number of publications or events, deprioritizing minor projects and/or looking for alternative resources.
Additionally, beyond the reductions included there were several requests for additional resources that
were not funded as part of this budget. A list of those requests is attached.
Administration
EdinaMN.gov
Date: September 2, 2025
To: Mayor & Council
cc: Executive Leadership Team
From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager
Subject: 2026-2027 City Manager Budget Proposal
Page 25 of 35
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Firefighter Staffing & SAFER Grant
The proposed 2026 preliminary total tax levy of $64,445,485 includes flexibility to support different
staffing levels for Paramedic/Firefighters, depending on the outcome of the SAFER grant application.
Council requested additional information about the possibility of hiring more firefighters than proposed.
Staff reviewed the preliminary proposal with the SAFER grant and has budgeted with the intended 12
positions if the grant is received. Additional information regarding adding more positions is provided
below:
Option 1: Base Proposal (already included in Proposed Budget)
6 Paramedic/Firefighters if SAFER grant is not awarded.
12 Paramedic/Firefighters if SAFER grant is awarded.
This scenario is already included in the proposed levy.
Option 2: Add 3 More Firefighters
9 Paramedic/Firefighters if no SAFER grant is awarded.
15 Paramedic/Firefighters if SAFER grant is awarded.
Additional Levy Impact: +0.90% in 2026, or $530,883 increase.
Option 3: Add 6 More Firefighters
12 Paramedic/Firefighters if no SAFER grant is awarded.
18 Paramedic/Firefighters if SAFER grant is awarded.
Additional Levy Impact: +1.80% in 2026, or $1,061,767 increase.
An additional alternative would be to look at increasing the 2027 proposed budget to account for
additional positions in 2027. Staff is unsure of how many firefighters we are able to recruit for at one
time.
These options provide Council with a clear view of the financial impact associated with expanding
firefighter staffing levels. The flexibility built into the preliminary levy ensures that we can responsibly
respond to the outcome of the SAFER grant while maintaining our commitment to public safety and
operational readiness.
Page 26 of 35
EdinaMN.gov
2026 –2027 Levy and Budget
September 2, 2025
Page 27 of 35
Tentative Timeline
Date Event Action
Dec 17th Council Approved 2025 Levy and Budget
February 4th & 6th Council Work Session Council Work Session (Services Overview by Dept.)
March 15th Discussion & Goal Setting Council Retreat
May 6th Council Work Session Council Work Session
May 20th Council Work Session Council Work Session
August 19th 26/27 Budget Presented Council Work Session
September 2nd 26/27 Budget Discussion Council Work Session
September 16th Preliminary Levy Adoption Council Meeting
September 30th Finance Deadline Preliminary levy due to County
Dec. 2 nd Council Work Session &
Council Meeting
Public hearing and adopt final 2026/27 Levy
Dec. 16th Council Meeting Adopt final 2026/27 Levy
Dec. 28 th Finance Deadline Final levy certification due to County
January 2025 Finance Deadline Publish detail budget book to website
Page 28 of 35
Tax Capacity, Certified Levy and City Tax Rate
$157,910,360 $164,716,554 $169,928,228
$190,473,325
$205,645,781 $211,649,964 $215,088,974
$39,659,543 $42,021,871 $45,367,336 $49,855,000 $54,418,565 $59,010,154 $65,517,252
27.9%28.8%28.9%28.1%28.4%30.2%33.0%
-5.0%
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026*
Tax Capacity Certified Tax Levy City Tax Rate
*2026 is estimate based on staff proposed
Page 29 of 35
Debt Service Levy Projection
$-
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Millions
Gymnasium Fire Station 1 Public Works Facility Sports Dome
Fire Station 2 Aquatic Center Highway 100 Interchange Citywide Roof
PW Cold Storage PD & Cityhall Fire Station 3 Public Works
Page 30 of 35
Debt Service Levy Projection (approved vs. future)
$-
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Millions
Gymnasium Fire Station 1 Public Works Facility Sports Dome
Fire Station 2 Aquatic Center Highway 100 Interchange Future Potential Projects
Page 31 of 35
2026 – 2027 Preliminary Levy Proposal
2024 2025 2026 2027
Budget Budget Projected Projected
GENERAL FUND LEVY $ 43,744,165 $ 47,543,215 $ 53,374,152 $ 57,540,859
General Fund Total 43,744,165 47,543,215 53,374,152 57,540,859
EXISTING DEBT SERVICE LEVIES
Gymnasium Debt Service 2015 HRA 392,000 398,000 - -
Fire Station Debt Service 2016A 403,000 406,000 403,000 404,000
Public Works Facility Debt Service 2017C 1,029,200 1,030,000 1,029,000 1,025,000
Public Works Facility Debt Service 2021B (2013A) 478,800 482,000 478,800 480,000
Sports Dome 2014 HRA 1,168,700 1,165,100 1,166,100 1,166,400
Community Health & Safety Center Debt Service 2024A - 1,133,449 1,070,600 1,070,600
Community Health & Safety Center Debt Service 2024B - 763,090 1,071,100 1,071,100
Community Health & Safety Center Debt Service 2025A - - 700,900 701,800
Aquatic Center 2025B - - 321,583 643,166
Highway 100 Interchange 2025B - - 206,700 206,700
Debt Service Levies Total 3,471,700 5,377,639 6,447,783 6,768,766
CONSTRUCTION FUND LEVIES
Capital Improvement Plan Levy 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,300,000 2,010,000
Equipment Levy 2,470,000 2,668,000 1,613,450 2,209,278
Street Special Levy 1,481,000 1,762,000 1,053,000 1,355,400
Special Park Improvement Levy 1,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
Construction Levies Total 6,951,000 5,830,000 4,366,450 5,974,678
HRA Fund Levies
HRA Operating Levy 251,700 259,300 267,100 275,100
HRA Levies Total 251,700 259,300 267,100 275,100
TOTAL PROPERTY TAX LEVIED $ 54,418,565 $ 59,010,154 $ 64,455,485 $ 70,559,403
Increase from Prior Year 9.15%8.44%9.23%9.47%
Page 32 of 35
7.55%5.88%
2.08%
0.50%
0.95%0.79%
0.52%
0.27%
1.71%
0.31%
1.72%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
Base New Debt 6 Firefighters Budget Additions Budget Work Plans Strategic Prioritization
Budget Changes
9.23%9.47%
2026
-3.33%
2027
Page 33 of 35
Next Steps
•Certify Preliminary Tax Levy on Sept. 16th
Page 34 of 35
Unfunded Requests for Additional Resources
Item Department/ Division New Staff #Estimated Amount
Federal Lobbyist Admin 0 56,500$
Community Broadbrand (ARPA program)Community Development 0 45,000
Electrical Dept. Lead Worker Engineering - Facilities 1 172,763
Master Plumber Engineering - Facilities 1 192,952
Building Utility Mechanic Engineering - Facilities 1 190,972
Sustainability Specialist Engineering - Sustainability 1 103,387
Water Resources Technician Engineering - Water 1 115,000
Program Coordinator (EX. PT)Parks & Recreation - Edina Art Center 0.75 26,129
Program Coordinator (EX. PT)Parks & Recreation - Edina Art Center 0.75 26,129
Program Coordinator (EX. PT)Parks & Recreation - Senior Center 0.75 36,556
PT Forestry Parks & Recreation 0.6 32,000
Ice Operations Coordinator - Braemar Parks & Recreation - Arena 1 123,287
Facility Maintenance Supervisor Parks & Recreation - Arena 1 134,349
Park Maintenance Parks & Recreation 1 173,587
Special Events Liasion & Budget Admin 0.62 125,000
Budget/Business Analyst Finance 1 150,000
1,703,612$
Page 35 of 35