HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-01-14 HPC Meeting Packet
Meeting location:
Edina City Hall
Mayor's Conference Room
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, January 14, 2025
7:00 PM Accessibility Support:
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification,
an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Meeting Agenda
4. Approval of Meeting Minutes
4.1. November 4, 2024 Minutes
5. Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share
issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on
tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must
limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on
the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or
Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the
Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
6. Reports/Recommendations
6.1. COA: 4507 Arden, street facing facade.
7. Chair and Member Comments
8. Staff Comments
8.1. 2025 Meeting Calendar
8.2. 2025 HPC Work Plan
9. Adjournment
Page 1 of 35
Page 2 of 35
BOARD & COMMISSION
ITEM REPORT
Date: January 14, 2025 Item Activity: Action
Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission
Agenda Number: 4.1
Prepared By: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner
Item Type: Minutes Department:
Item Title: November 4, 2024 Minutes
Action Requested:
Approve the November 4, 2024 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting minutes.
Information/Background:
November 4, 2024 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting minutes.
Supporting Documentation:
1. 11-04-2024 HPC Minutes
Page 3 of 35
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: X/XX/24
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Heritage Preservation Commission
Monday, November 4, 2024
I. Call to Order
Chair Lonnquist called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were Chair Lonnquist, Commissioners Cundy, Everson, Nickels, Olson, Jarvinen, Farrell-
Straus.
Staff present: Assistant City Planner Kris Aaker, Preservation Consultants from Hess Roise Co., Elizabeth
Gates and Rachel Peterson.
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
Motion made by Commissioner Farrell-Straus, seconded by Commissioner Jarvinen, to approve the
meeting agenda as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Chair Lonnquist noted two spelling errors in the September 10, 2024, Meeting Minutes.
Motion made by Commissioner Jarvinen, seconded Commissioner Olson, to approve the corrected
September 10, 2024, meeting minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried.
V. Community Comment: None
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. COA: 4509 Wooddale Avenue-Changes to Street Facing Facade
Assistant Planner Aaker, stated that the existing home at the above address is a two-story Garrison
Revival home that was built in 1928. The Certificate of Appropriateness Application (COA) is for a new
covered entry on the street-facing facade. The applicant received a COA for a new garage in January. The
homeowners are requesting an awning over the front entry.
Hess Roise has reviewed the application and concluded that the awning does not comply with a number of
guidelines in the Plan of Treatment.
Assistant Planner Aaker stated that the homeowners are present along with their contractor.
Page 4 of 35
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: X/XX/24
Scot Waggoner, Project Contractor, stated that one of the main challenges is that the shingles on the
main house have not been updated and will need to be updated at some time. A standing-seam metal roof
would match the style of the home.
Commissioner Farrell-Straus, asked for an explanation of the process.
Commissioner Cundy ultimately stated that the style and materials for a standing-seam metal roof would
not be appropriate for the neighborhood. Commissioner Olson concurred and further stated that the
two proposed ideas do not retain the historical characteristics of the home.
Additional conversation ensued.
When asked for the rationale for wanting a covering over the front door, the homeowners stated that in
addition to desiring to have that warrantee for their new door and lighting, it is a hardship when there is
poor weather.
Additional discussion ensued.
Motion made by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Nickels, to decline the COA for
4509 Wooddale Avenue. All voted aye.
B. COA: 4633 Bruce Avenue; New Garage and Changes to Street Facing Façade
Assistant Planner Aaker, stated that the existing home on the lot is a Cape Cod Revival style home that
was built in 1936. Several photos, provided by the applicant, were shared with the Commission. Very few
changes to the home have been made. The applicant is requesting a Certificated of Appropriateness to
modify the screened porch that is located on the south side of the home, add a small addition on the
back of the home and replacement dethatched garage. The recommendation is to approve the proposed
changes to the property because the proposed work complies with the Plan of Treatment.
The property owners and their architect were present to answer any questions.
Additional conversation ensued.
Commissioner Olson stated that the plan would look great anyplace other than in the Country Club
neighborhood.
There was discussion regarding the fact that the back of the house is not technically street-facing because
it faces the neighbor’s back yard; however, it is nevertheless very visible.
It was asked which is important, that it is street-facing or that it is very visible. Chair Lonnquist stated she
wants to go on record saying that this is one of the hair-splitting definitions that will be corrected in the
new Plan of Treatment.
Page 5 of 35
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: X/XX/24
Chair Lonnquist asked Commissioner Olson what type of rear addition would be better. Commissioner
Olson stated that he doesn’t believe any rear addition would be appropriate because it would be like
adding an addition to the front of the house. Chair Lonnquist made an additional attempt to explain that
visible from the street and street-facing façade are two different things.
Additional conversation ensued.
Motion made by Commissioner Cundy, seconded by Commissioner Jarvinen, to approve the COA
with the addition of small window added to the upper gabled street facing end of the garage,
keep two individual garage doors, and keep the lower windows centered. Motion passes with 4
ayes and 1nay (Olson).
VII. Chair and Member Comments:
Chair Lonnquist reported on the Work Plan Review.
Chair Lonnquist stated that she is giving a presentation at the Edina Realty sales meeting on the Century Homes
Program, and invited others to join her. The presentation is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 19,
2024.
Chair Lonnquist stated she is happy to announce that on Saturday, November 16, 2024, from 10:00 a.m. until
11:00 a.m. the Commission can join together and walk the district.
Farrell-Straus asked if she had asked an improper question when the COA was presented. The answer was no.
Additional conversation ensued.
VIII. Staff Comments:
Assistant Planner Aaker, had no staff comments.
IX. Adjournment
Motion made by Commissioner Cundy , seconded by Commission Everson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:25
pm. All voted aye. The motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Kris Aaker
Page 6 of 35
BOARD & COMMISSION
ITEM REPORT
Date: January 14, 2025 Item Activity: Action
Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission
Agenda Number: 6.1
Prepared By: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner
Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Community Development
Item Title: COA: 4507 Arden, street facing facade.
Action Requested:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed work.
The proposed work complies with B., I., and J. among others of the Country Club Plan of Treatment.
Conditions of approval:
Any change to the approved elevations or materials will need to be submitted for review.
Information/Background:
The subject property, 4507 Arden Avenue, is located east of Arden, and south of Sunnyside Road.
The existing home on the lot is a two-story Mediterranean Revival style home built in 1936 and is a
contributing resource to the historic district.
The applicant is requesting a certificate of appropriateness for an addition on the east/south façade
which is visible from the street facing façade. The proposed project also includes replacing some of
the windows on secondary facades and changing the garage door on the existing attached garage.
Better Together
Supporting Documentation:
1. Applicant Submittal
2. Staff Report
3. Consultant Memo
4. File Photos
Page 7 of 35
COA Application
Address: 4507 Arden Ave, Edina, MN 55424
Date: 12-13-24
Project Narrative
The property owners would like to put a modest single-story addition on to the back of their
1929 Italian Renaissance/Mediterranean Revival style house. The addition will be partially
visible from the street, however it will not touch the original street facing façade of the
house. Only 4 ft of the addition will be visible from the street and it will be set back 26.5 ft
from the original street facing façade of the house. The approximately 480 sq ft addition will
be located behind the original footprint of the house and nestled between a kitchen and
attached garage addition, which were built by a previous owner at an unknown date. This
prior addition, although clad in stucco, features gabled roofs with asphalt shingles, which
are incongruous with the original house’s design and style.
There is currently a paver patio in the space where the proposed addition will be located.
The addition will contain a sunroom, which will create a year-round space for the owners to
be able to entertain their large extended family in, a fully-conditioned courtyard of sorts. The
addition is sized to allow for a small seating area around the fireplace as well as space for a
long dining table capable of seating 10-12 people. The new sunroom will serve as a central
gathering space for the home, and allow for better flow between the dining room and
kitchen.
Exterior materials for the addition will match the existing house: stucco cladding, clay tile
roof parapet caps, and white gridded round top windows and doors. The style of the
windows and doors on the addition (round top with grids) will play off of the original
windows that are still remaining on the house, and fit the style of the house. The exterior
cladding will feature similar banding to tie into the existing house, and the chimney form will
be shaped in a manner requisite of the style of the house. The roof of the proposed addition
will be flat with parapets, covered with a rubber membrane and potential extensive green
roof system to help mitigate stormwater run-off on-site.
Separate from the addition, but part of the construction project, will be the replacement of
several windows on the south and east façades (non-street facing) of the existing house and
a new garage door. Three existing casement windows on the south wall of the main level
sitting room, that are clearly not original to the house, will be replaced with three round top
casement windows that will align with the original head height. These windows will be more
similar in size and style to the original round top windows found in the adjacent living room.
Additionally, one double-hung window on the east wall of one of the upper level bedrooms
will be replaced with a window that is similar in style, but with a slightly higher sill, to allow
for the roof of the new addition to be located below it. This window sill will then align with
the sills of the existing windows in the adjacent bathroom on the same façade. The existing
painted raised panel garage door faces south, and will be replaced with a wood inset panel
door.
Page 8 of 35
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards
Standards for Rehabilitation:
a) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that
requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and
spatial relationships. The property will continue to be used as a single-
family residence.
b) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The
removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and
spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. The
original street-facing façade of the house will not be modified in any way.
No distinguishing exterior features will be removed or covered up. Interior
rooms will continue to function in their existing roles.
c) Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place,
and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development,
such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic
properties, will not be undertaken. The proposed addition will be
designed in the same style as the original house yet distinctive from it in
its own right.
d) Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own
right will be retained and preserved. There is a prior addition off of the rear
of the house that will be impacted by the proposed addition, however it is
not historic in any way and measures should not be taken to retain or
preserve it.
e) Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or
examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
The existing front façade, clay tile roof, round top windows, and swooping
chimney are the most distinctive features of the existing house and they
will not be affected by the proposed addition.
f) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where
the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature,
the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and where
possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated
by documentary and physical evidence. N/A.
g) Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using
the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic
materials will not be used. N/A.
h) Archaeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
N/A.
i) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not
destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that
characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the
old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale
and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and
its environment. The proposed addition will not affect historic materials,
features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property, as it is
located in a spot that only impacts the rear of the original house and parts
of a previous addition. It will be smaller in stature and located 26.5 ft
Page 9 of 35
behind the front façade. Only 4 ft of it will be visible from the front
elevation. The proposed addition will use materials that are historically
compatible, and be scaled appropriately to compliment the original
house.
j) New additions and adjacent new construction will be undertaken in such a
manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of
the historic property and its environment will be unimpaired. The
proposed addition will only affect the rear of the original house, modifying
four window openings, and could be removed and repaired in the future.
Two windows in the dining room will be converted to doorway openings,
one window in the sitting room will be replaced with stained glass, and
one window in an upper level bedroom will be replaced and shortened.
Page 10 of 35
Page 11 of 35
#43503LICENSE NO.Wayne W. PreuhsDATES1DECEMBER 13, 2024Deephaven, Minnesota 55391Phone (952) 474-796418202 Minnetonka Blvd. Suite 401Web: www.advsur.comAdvanceSurveying & Engineering Co.CITY HOMES4507 ARDEN AVE. CLIENT/JOB ADDRESSEDINA, MN SHEET TITLEPROPOSED SURVEY &TREE PROTECTION PLANSHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 1DWG ORIENTATION SCALE241785 JRDRAWING NUMBER20'10'0NOVEMBER 1, 2024DATE SURVEYED:DECEMBER 13, 2024DATE DRAFTED:SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lot 3, Block 2, Country Club District Fairway Section, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listedabove. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own,which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records orconsult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correctand that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included onthe survey have been shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary forthe survey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish thecorners of the property.4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review andfor the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over theserequirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding withconstruction.6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of thetopography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use indetermining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relateonly to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check atleast one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations foruse on this site or before beginning construction.7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment.There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed bya current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show anyeasements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.8.While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not asfamiliar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are.Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard gradescarefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, weare not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the localbuilding and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this surveyto said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposedimprovements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction orplanning improvements to the property.9.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines,are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building.STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:● Denotes iron survey marker, found.EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGEHOUSE 1,624 SQ. FT.TOTAL EXISTING BUILDINGS 1,624 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 7,683 SQ. FT.BUILDING COVERAGE 21.1%EXISTING HARDCOVERHOUSE 1,624 SQ. FT.DRIVEWAY/COURTYARD AREA 1,767 SQ. FT.FRONT WALK 197 SQ. FT.FRONT PATIO 50 SQ. FT.CONCRETE WALLS 6 SQ. FT.AC PAD 7 SQ. FT.PAVER WALK 18 SQ. FT.STONE WALLS 57 SQ. FT.TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 3,726 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 7,683 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 48.5%PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGEHOUSE 2,094 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDINGS 2,094 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 7,683 SQ. FT.BUILDING COVERAGE 27.3%PROPOSED HARDCOVERHOUSE 2,094 SQ. FT.DRIVEWAY 1,357 SQ. FT.FRONT WALK 197 SQ. FT.FRONT PATIO 50 SQ. FT.CONCRETE WALLS 6 SQ. FT.AC PAD 7 SQ. FT.PAVER WALK 18 SQ. FT.STONE WALLS 57 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 3,786 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 7,683 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 49.3%Page 12 of 35
Page 13 of 35
Page 14 of 35
Page 15 of 35
Page 16 of 35
January 7, 2025
Heritage Preservation Commission
Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner
• COA H-25-01, 4507- Arden Avenue- Changes to Street Facing Facade
Information / Background:
The subject property, 4507 Arden Avenue, is located east of Arden, and south of Sunnyside Road.
The existing home on the lot is a two-story Mediterranean Revival style home built in 1936 and is a
contributing resource to the historic district.
The applicant is requesting a certificate of appropriateness for an addition on the east/south façade
which is visible from the street facing façade. The proposed project also includes replacing some of
the windows on secondary facades and changing the garage door on the existing attached garage.
Proposed Work
Window and Door Openings
Three rectangular window openings on the first story of the south facade overlooking the driveway
will be modified to become round-arched openings with new casement sash, multi-light windows.
The garage door is not visible from the right-of-way. The modifications to these openings will not
affect the historic integrity of the house.
New Addition
A new one-story addition is planned on the east facade. It will fit into a recessed space between the
east (rear) facade of the historic section of the house and the non-historic attached garage. A small
portion of the addition, projecting out roughly 5′-6.5″ to the south from the plane of the historic
house, will be visible from the street.
Consultant Memo:
See attached memo from Elizabeth Gales and Rachel Peterson, Hess, Roise and Company.
Page 17 of 35
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Recommendation & Findings:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed work.
Approval:
The recommendation is to approve the changes to the window and door openings and new
addition at 4507 Arden Avenue. Those changes include:
Replacing three rectangular window openings on the south facade. Replacing second-story window
opening on the east façade, (not visible from the public right-of-way) and the garage door is also
not visible from the right-of-way. The modifications to these openings will not affect the historic
integrity of the house.
The changes with a new addition will not destroy historic materials or features on the street-facing
facade, which characterize the property.
The addition will be clad in similar materials to the historic section of the house.
The Recommendation for Approval is based on the following:
The proposed work complies with B., I., and J. among others of the Country Club Plan of
Treatment.
Conditions of approval:
Any change to the approved elevations or materials will need to be submitted for review.
Page 18 of 35
Page 1
MEMO
Date: 01/07/2025
To: Kris Aaker, City of Edina
From: Elizabeth Gales and Rachel Peterson, Hess, Roise and Company
Re: Certificate of Appropriateness Review – 4507 Arden Avenue
Hess Roise has reviewed the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) application for 4507 Arden
Avenue in the Country Club Historic District using “Edina’s Historic Country Club District Plan
of Treatment.”
The house was constructed ca.1926 and is located on the east side of Arden Avenue near the
north end of the block. The front facade overlooks Arden Avenue to the west. A driveway on the
south side of the property provides access from the street to an attached garage at the rear of the
parcel. A one-story kitchen addition and the garage were built in 1961-1962, which is after the
end of the period of significance for the historic district. The siting of the house and neighboring
properties limits views of the secondary facades on the north and south, and of the non-historic
kitchen and garage.
The house is in the Mediterranean Revival style and is a contributing resource to the historic
district. Character-defining features include:
• Two-story building with stucco cladding.
• Shallow-pitched hipped roof clad in red clay tiles.
• Shallow eaves with little to no overhang.
• Round-arched window openings.
• Multi-pane, double-hung sash windows and French door.
• Decorative metal work.
The COA includes the following proposed work:
• Replace some of the windows on secondary facades and the garage door.
• Add a one-story addition to the east (rear) facade.
Proposed Work
Window and Door Openings
Three rectangular window openings on the first story of the south facade overlooking the
driveway will be modified to become round-arched openings with new casement sash, multi-
light windows. The architect notes that “the existing windows do not appear to be original, nor
do they align with any other windows on the house.”1 The shape of the proposed openings
appears to be inspired by the round-arched openings on the west (front) facade.
1 Tommy Everson, Everson Architect, email to Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner, City of Edina, January 6, 2025.
Page 19 of 35
Page 2
One rectangular opening on the second story of the east facade, which faces the backyard, will be
made shorter to accommodate a new one-story addition. The height of the opening will match
another window opening on the same facade to the north. A new multi-light double-hung sash
window will be installed in the new shorter opening.
The non-historic garage has a double-car opening holding a multi-panel, overhead garage door
with windows on the top segment. The garage door opening will remain the same size but a new
overhead door that looks like two pairs of carriage doors will be installed in the opening.
New Addition
A new one-story addition is planned on the east facade. It will fit into a recessed space between
the east (rear) facade of the historic section of the house and the non-historic attached garage.
The addition will expand the footprint of the non-historic kitchen addition to the south. The new
addition will be largely screened from view by the historic house and by adjacent properties. A
small portion of the addition, projecting out 5′-6.5″ to the south from the plane of the historic
house, will be visible from the street. This projecting section includes a new fireplace, and the
design for the chimney references the historic chimney on the house. The height of the addition
is secondary to the house and the top of the addition aligns with a projecting band below the
second-story windows, which is original and present on all facades of the historic section. The
new addition will have a flat roof and will be clad in stucco that matches the texture and color of
the historic house.
No other changes are proposed to the massing, footprint, cladding, or fenestration of the historic
section of the house or of the non-historic attached garage.
Recommendation
The Plan of Treatment includes ten guidelines for existing houses. The following are
considered the most relevant to the proposed work.
B. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive
materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property
will be avoided.
I. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic
materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall
be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size,
scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
J. New additions and adjacent new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment will be unimpaired.
Window and Door Openings
The three rectangular window openings on the south facade are on a secondary facade and are
east of the projecting historic chimney. They are not clearly visible from the public right-of-way
Page 20 of 35
Page 3
given their location and the current vegetation around the house. The existing openings are not
character-defining features and modifying the shape to round arched, which is working with the
design vocabulary of the house, and installing new multi-light windows will not diminish the
historic integrity of the house.
The second-story window opening on the east facade is not visible from the public right-of-way.
The garage door is also not visible from the right-of-way. They are not character-defining
features. The modifications to these openings will not affect the historic integrity of the house.
New Addition
The proposed new addition to the east facade complies with guidelines I and J. The new addition
will be located on the rear facade of the historic house. It will not destroy historic materials or
features on the street-facing facade, which characterize the property. The scale and massing of
the addition is smaller than the historic house and the addition will be minimally visible from the
front (west) facade. The addition will be clad in similar materials to the historic section of the
house. If the addition were removed at a future date, the original massing of the house would be
intact.
Hess Roise recommends approval of the modifications to the window openings on the south and
west facades, the new garage door, and the proposed addition to the rear (east) facade of the
house.
Page 21 of 35
Page 22 of 35
Page 23 of 35
City ofEdina Residential Field Card Printed: 06/13/2007 Assessment Year: 2007 Version: 2 Model: 006-002-060 Zoning: Area Rating: Site Rating: Land Quality: Contamination: Flood Plain Map Ref: PUDRef: Allowable Units: Excess Land (SqFt): Zoning Variance: Frontage: Left Side: Rear Side: Right Side: Effective Width: Effective Depth: Effective Water: Property Area (SqFt): Acreage: Park: Park Quality: On Lake: Lake Quality: On River: River Quality: Landscape Quality: Attributes Curbs Gas Gutter Paved Street Sewer Available Sidewalk Water Available Influences Thru Street R-1Excellent Very Good N 55 139 55 139 0 7,430 Average PID: Property Address: l 8-028-24-12-00174507 Arden Ave 003 I 002 Lot /Block: Addition: District: Neighborhood: Partial Const(%): Country Club District Fairway Section 03 0114 Pool I Area: Model: 006-002-060 Quality:Dwelling Type: Adjacent Property: View: Arch.I Appeal: Quality: Shape: Style: Construction: Exterior Walls: Exterior Trim: Roof Type: Roof Cover: Window Type I: Window Type 2: Air Conditioning: Dormer Length: Dormer Quality: # Patio Doors: Placement: # of Cars: Floor Area: Condition: Exterior Walls: _Ga�!g�#2 .-Placement: # of Cars: Floor Area: Condition: Exterior Walls: rorc11 Glazed Area: Quality: Screened Area: Quality: Open Area: Quality: Patfo Patio I Area: Quality: Patio 2 Area: Quality: Deck Deck I Area: Quality: Deck 2 Area: Quality: Single Family Equal Negative Average A07 Square Two Story Wood Frame Stucco Hip Slate Tile Double Hung Central Attached 2 484 Average Stucco 380 Average Pool 2 Area: Quality: Amenities Area (SqFt): 845 Type: Regular Finished(%): 50 Quality: Average # of Fireplaces: Fplc. Quality: Avg. Clear. Height: Elec. Svc: Standard Htg. Svc: Hot water, gas fired W.O. Type: W.O. Quality: Basement Baths (#/Qual.) Spa: Dix: Full: 3/4: 1/2: I I I I I BasemenfRoom count Bedrooms: Baths: Family: Kitchen: Other: Kitchen Rating: Interior: Trim: Floor: Avg. Clear. Height: # of Fireplaces: Fplc. Quality: Standard Plaster Hardwood Wood Average Property Type: Zoning: Dwelling Type:
Owner(s):
1st Battis (#/Quality) Spa: Dix: Full: 3/4: I / Very Good 1/2: I ist Room Count·· Bedrooms: Baths: Family: Living: Dining: Kitchen: Other: Total Rooms: 3 Interior: Plaster Trim: Hardwood Floor: Carpet Avg. Clear. Height: # of Fireplaces: Fplc. Quality: 2nd Baths (#/Quality) Spa: / Dix: I Full: 1 I Very Good 3/4: / 1/2: I in,f.Roomcoiint Bedrooms: 4 Baths: I Other: Total Rooms: 4 Comments R -Residential R-1Single FamilyChristine I KoppelInterior: Trim: Floor: Avg. Clear. Height: # of Fireplaces: Fplc. Quality: 3rd Baths_ (#/Quality) Spa: Dix: Full: 3/4: 1/2: 3rcl°Jl.oom Count Bedrooms: Baths: Other: Total Rooms: Int. Layout: Manual Assess: Actual Age: Effective Age: Renovated Age: Functional %: Economic%: Buifdin� Areas Unfin. 1st GBA: Unfin. 2nd GBA: Unfin. 3rd GBA: Unfin. GBA: Standard N 1929 1985 1st Floor Area: 1,085 2nd Floor Area: 917 3rd Floor Area: Total GBA: 2,002 Totafifooms Bedrooms: 4 Baths: 2 Family: I Living: 1 Dining: 1 Kitchen: I Other: 0 Total: 8 Date: Price: Code: Desc: Appraiser ID: Appraisal Date: Reason: Result: Appraiser ID: Appraisal Date: Reason: Result: Left Tag: Yes /No Value: Desc: I Length 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dimensions
Width Sq Ft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09/08/2006 $830,000 00 Good Sale RCN 06/21/2006 Quintile Review Left Tag Page 24 of 35
Page 25 of 35
Page 26 of 35
Page 27 of 35
Page 28 of 35
BOARD & COMMISSION
ITEM REPORT
Date: January 14, 2025 Item Activity: Information
Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission
Agenda Number: 8.1
Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner
Item Type: Other Department: Community Development
Item Title: 2025 Meeting Calendar
Action Requested:
None.
Information/Background:
2025 Meeting Calendar attached.
Supporting Documentation:
1. 2025-Meetings-Calendar-and-Religious-Observance-Dates-PDF
Page 29 of 35
Page 30 of 35
Page 31 of 35
BOARD & COMMISSION
ITEM REPORT
Date: January 14, 2025 Item Activity: Information
Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission
Agenda Number: 8.2
Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner
Item Type: Other Department: Community Development
Item Title: 2025 HPC Work Plan
Action Requested:
None.
Information/Background:
Attached is the Council approved 2025 HPC work plan.
Supporting Documentation:
1. 2025 HPC Work Plan
Page 32 of 35
Page 33 of 35
Page 34 of 35
Page 35 of 35