Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-08-12 HPC Meeting Packet Meeting location: Edina City Hall Mayor's Conference Room 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting Agenda Monday, August 12, 2024 Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes: July 9, 2024 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Draft Ordinance, Plan of Treatment, Architectural Syles in the Country Club Document and Escrow Fee 6.2. COA: 4501 Drexel Avenue, Changes to Street Facing Facade 6.3. 2025 HPC Work Plan 7. Chair and Member Comments Page 1 of 78 8. Staff Comments 9. Adjournment Page 2 of 78 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: August 12, 2024 Item Activity: Action Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda Number: 4.1 Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Minutes Department: Community Development Item Title: Minutes: July 9, 2024 Action Requested: Approve the July 9, 2024 Heritage Preservation Commission minutes. Information/Background: July 9, 2024 Minutes Supporting Documentation: 1. HPC Minutes 7-9-24 Page 3 of 78 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: X/XX/24 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Tuesday, July 9, 2024 I. Call to Order Chair Lonnquist called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Lonnquist, Commissioners Cundy, Everson, Nickels, Pope, Breiter, Olson, Jarvinen, Farrell-Straus. Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Dalrymple and Preservation Consultant Elizabeth Gales, Hess Roise and Company. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Jarvinen seconded by Farrell-Strauss, to approve the meeting agenda as submitted. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Chair Lonnquist, seconded Olson, to approve the May 13, 2024, meeting minutes with an adjustment to reflect the actual conversation about lawn signs. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. H-24-2: 4516 Wooddale Avenue-Changes to Street Facing Facade Liaison Dalrymple stated that the existing home at the above address is a two-story Garrison Revival home that was built in 1931. The owners are requesting a new covered entry. The applicant will be refacing the existing stoop and rebuilding the existing steps. The applicant will be adding a roof above the medallion above the front door. The proposed materials match the existing materials of the house. Liaison Dalrymple stated that the Hess Roise has reviewed the application and provided a memo noting that one of the character-defining-features of 4516 Wooddale Avenue was the Adam-inspired wood family above the doorway. Hess Roise noted that the character of the property will be preserved with this application, and new additions will not destroy historic features. Staff concurred with Hess Roise and recommended that the Heritage Preservation Commission approve the application. The condition of approval would be that any changes would have to be submitted, reviewed and approved. Page 4 of 78 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: X/XX/24 There was a question regarding blue stone. Blue stone is used a lot throughout the district. Additional conversation ensued regarding pillars. There was a question regarding the set-back requirements. The property indeed conforms to the set-back requirements. Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Jarvinen, to approve the plans for 4516 Wooddale Avenue changes to the street facing facade as submitted. All voted aye. VII. Chair and Member Comments: Chair Lonnquist stated that the main thrust of the meeting is brainstorming for the Work Plan. The Heritage Preservation Commission needs to share ahead of time with the City Council what their plans are. Liaison Dalrymple stated that the brainstorming will be for the up-coming year. Chair Lonnquist stated that reviewing, discussing and approving homeowners’ applications for changes to their properties is the top priority of the Heritage Preservation Commission. The Commission also designates Landmark Properties. The Heritage Preservation Award should also remain on the goals of the Commission. Chair Lonnquist stated that the first four Century Home recipients are now on the City website. Chair Lonnquist reminded the Council of the promise to meet with three community organizations in order to spread the word about the Century Home Program. Chair Lonnquist stated that she is happy to schedule some meetings for the fall and invited the Commission Members to join. There was discussion regarding the “busy season” for the Heritage Preservation Commission. Commissioner Cundy stated that January, February, and March are very busy months with people bringing projects forward. Liaison Dalrymple stated that the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviews the ordinance after the Heritage Preservation Commission makes a recommendation. There was discussion as to why the past year has been relatively light with regard to the Commission. Vice-Chair stated that part of the problem could be related to interest rates going up. Chair Lonnquist stated the last item that is apparently being projected to the Commissioners should be pushed into 2025. Chair Lonnquist invited Commissioner Olson and Commissioner Pope to be part of a working group that could put together a schematic on how the Heritage Preservation Commission can reach out to the neighbors. Liaison Dalrymple stated that there are changes in the ordinance that are City-wide. Additional conversation ensued. Page 5 of 78 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: X/XX/24 A reminder was given to the Heritage Preservation Commission that the National Registry accepts buildings that are at least 50 years old or older, which means buildings that were built in 1974 or earlier. Also, it is fairly easy to get exceptions to the 50-year rule. Liaison Dalrymple suggested that the Commissioners make the items on the Work Plan as specific as possible. Ideally, the Work Plan would have items that can be visibly completed for the wider community to see. A question was raised regarding solar panels and whether Edina has a policy related to the use of solar panels. Liaison Dalrymple stated that the Zoning Ordinances would place limits on the use of solar panels. Additional conversation ensued. The idea of a walking tour was raised. Chair Lonnquist has some information from the previous walking tours. Additional conversation ensued regarding the promotion of a walking tour. Liaison Dalrymple suggested an Open House at the May Heritage Preservation Commission meeting for the Century Homes folks to attend. Chair Lonnquist brought up the use of a yard sign for the Century Homes to be used as advertisement for about a month. The sign would give contact information on how to learn more about becoming a Century Home. This yard sign would be in addition to the formal plaque for their house. Additional conversation ensued. Chair Lonnquist requested that the Commission discuss the National Preservation Award, which is in May every year. The nominations invariably come from the Heritage Preservation Commission. One Commissioner suggested that the National Preservation Award should fall under the heading of outreach. Another Commissioner suggested that the public should be providing the nominations. Additional conversation ensued. VIII. Staff Comments: Liaison Dalrymple stated that the Preserve Minnesota Conference will be in Red Wing this year on September 18-20. If a Commissioner is interested in attending, that would be great. Otherwise, a staff member will attend. Liaison Dalrymple stated that September 3, 2024, is the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting with City Council. The Work Session begins at 5:30 p.m. Liaison Dalrymple stated that Heritage Preservation Commission Ordinance will be on the agenda for August 12, 2024. After the Heritage Preservation Commission recommends the ordinance, the plan is to have the ordinance on the Planning Commission Public Hearing Agenda on September 12, 2024. The next step is for the ordinance to go to City Council for a Public Hearing on September 17, 2024. Tentatively, City Council would make a final decision on October 1, 2024. Page 6 of 78 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: X/XX/24 Liaison Dalrymple stated it would be good to have at least one Heritage Preservation Commissioner present for each of the meetings. Ideally, the Commissioner would be able to answer questions. Staff will be present at the meetings along with the City consultants and attorneys. Additional conversation ensued. Consultant Gales stated that the National Trust for Historic Preservation has an annual conference every year in a different city. This year, it will be held in New Orleans. The price is unknown, but the National Trust for Historic Preservation is known for their tours. Chair Lonnquist requested that an email be sent out with the information about the two different conferences and all of the extra dates. Liaison Dalrymple agreed to send the email. IX. Adjournment Motion made by Cundy, seconded by Pope, to adjourn the meeting at 8:07 pm. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily Bodeker Page 7 of 78 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: August 12, 2024 Item Activity: Action Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda Number: 6.1 Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Report & Recommendation Department: Community Development Item Title: Draft Ordinance, Plan of Treatment, Architectural Syles in the Country Club Document and Escrow Fee Action Requested: Review and recommend draft Ordinance, Plan of Treatment, Architectural Styles Document, Escrow fee policy and Advisory Communication. Information/Background: Staff and the Heritage Preservation Commission subcommittee have been working on draft changes to the City's Preservation Ordinance and Country Club Plan of Treatment in addition to creating a draft escrow fee policy and architectural styles document. The Heritage Preservation Commission is asked to review the documents as well as the Commission Advisory Communication document and make a recommendation on the proposed drafts. After a recommendation by the HPC, staff will send out public hearing notices, send the draft documents to the State Historic Preservation Office for Review, and create a public input page on Better Together Edina. The Planning Commission and City Council will hold public hearings on the draft changes. Ultimately, City Council will take action on the proposed changes. Link to Current Ordinance Current Plan of Treatment Supporting Documentation: 1. HPC Advisory Communication 2. Draft Ordinance 3. Draft Plan of Treatment 4. Draft Examples of Architectural Styles in The Country Club District 5. DRAFT Escrow Policy Page 8 of 78 Date:August 12,2024 To:Mayor &City Council From:Heritage Preservation Commission Subject:Recommended Updates and Additions to Policies and Procedures for Exterior Renovations in the Country Club Heritage Preservation District Approved Work Plan Item: X Yes No Council Charge: 1:Study &Report 2:Review &Comment 3:Review &Recommend 4:Review &Decide X Items not on the approved work plan:Council action is rarely taken mid-year for items not on the current approved work plan.Action is only taken if Council chooses to discuss the Advisory Communication at theCouncilmeetingandprovidesspecificdirectionthroughaCouncilvote.Commissions are encouraged to submit new initiative proposals through the annual work plan process. Action Requested: The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)recommends adoption of the following updated documents: -Plan of Treatment for the Country Club Heritage Landmark District -Ordinance NO.2023-******Amending City Code concerning the HPC as well as the two new documents: -Edina Landmark Property and District Escrow Fee Policy -Examples of Architectural Styles in the Country Club District These four documents will collectively address past concerns while also improving clarity for all parties. Situation: In 2020,the HPC began raising concerns with staff and Council about two major home renovation projects in the Country Club District by one developer.Both projects involved multiple violations,stop work orders, amendments to the approved plans,and appeals of HPC decisions to City Council.These projects generated significant resident complaints and consumed excessive staff resources.For context,most projects that come before the HPC require just one meeting for approval (with some also utilizing an optional review for informal feedback)and an appeal to Council for an HPC decision hadn’t occurred in a decade.In working to prevent demolition-by-neglect on these two projects and uphold the Plan of Treatment as charged,the HPC revealed inconsistencies between this guiding document and the city ordinance.In addition,staff conceded Page 9 of 78 2 that they lacked sufficient tools to effectively enforce current rules in these two situations.The resulting Advisory Communication from the HPC in 2022 made recommendations to pursue these goals: 1.Prevent the loss of contributing heritage resources in the Country Club District. 2.Clarify the discrepancies in city documents as to when a COA is required. 3.Improve the application process. 4.Build education tools that clarify and illustrate appropriate rehabilitation. After extensive work by city staff and attorneys,in collaboration with a subcommittee of the HPC and the city’s new team of preservation consultants,the documents that will achieve these first three of these goals have been finalized.The HPC hopes that the Planning Commission and City Council approve all four documents so that it can proceed with its 2024 work plan item to achieve the final goal of public outreach. Background: The Country Club District was developed by Samuel S.Thorpe of Thorpe Brothers Realty Co.in the 1920s, following models in Kansas City and several East Coast cities.The majority of homes were built from 1924-1944,the district’s “period of significance”when deed restrictions dictated the style,color,and other aspects of the homes.In 1983,the Country Club District was listed on the National Register of Historic Places for its use of zoning,its cohesive design,and its well preserved concentration of homes in Period Revival (or Eclectic Movement)architectural styles.In the 1980 nomination survey,507 of the 555 homes (93%)were deemed “contributing resources”that retained sufficient integrity.In 2003 Edina designated the Country Club District a Heritage Landmark and approved a Plan of Treatment to guide local preservation. This document was revised in 2008 following a one-year moratorium on tear-downs.The city’s 2019 resurvey reported that 488 homes (88%)remained contributing resources and that the district is overall in “an excellent state of preservation.”The preferred treatment for heritage preservation resources in the district is rehabilitation,which updates properties through repair,alteration,and additions while preserving the portions that convey historic and architectural values. Assessment: Two multi-year construction projects in the Country Club District revealed three main areas of vulnerability disrupting the HPC’s charge of historic preservation:staff enforcement of violations,inconsistencies between the city documents,and lack of tools to avoid similar situations in the future.HPC members shared the frustration of many residents that the city’s stated preservation objectives were not being upheld fairly and consistently.That frustration has evaporated over the past year on the HPC as staff have carefully redrafted and expanded the documents they need to implement the community’s goal of historic preservation in the Country Club District.We urge the Council to adopt these four documents.The HPC is also grateful for the clarity and consistency that the new Building Official and the new preservation consultants have brought to our stated role of determining appropriate exterior renovation in this district. Page 10 of 78 3 Recommendation: The major changes and advantages are listed beneath each document we recommend Council adopt. Ordinance NO.2023-*****Amending City Code concerning the HPC -added clarity to terms,including demolition and street facing facade -added definitions of demolition by neglect,character-defining features,and more -inserted a one-year time limit for Certificates of Appropriateness (COAs),during which time both a COA permit and a building permit must be procured,with reasonable extension options -clarified when a COA is required as well as what work is exempt from a COA in a landmark district -expanded the Maintenance of Heritage Resources section forbidding deterioration by neglect -added escrow requirement for permits for all Heritage Landmark Properties/Districts (more below) Edina Landmark Property and District Escrow Fee Policy -New form to be signed by contractor and property owner acknowledging responsibility to maintain the protection of historic resources throughout the construction process and to inform staff of proposed changes to approved plans.Staff may seek HPC approval if changes are significant. -Fee required based on project valuation ($3,000 fee if under $100,000 and $15,000 fee if over)that city may use if needed to keep structures weathertight and protected,to ensure compliance with other ordinances,and for reinspection fees.The balance must be maintained and will be refunded when all permits,including the COA permit,have been closed. -this form also states the ordinance language for Stop Work Orders and Enforcement Plan of Treatment for the Country Club District -added historical context,map,and explanation of the period of significance -added one-year time limit on COAs per ordinance change,with detail on required permit timing -explained the COA application requirements and review process -listed projects exempt from a COA including replacement of exterior elements with like materials -emphasized that construction must follow approved COA plans and explained COA amendments -clarified which design review elements are recommended guidelines rather than requirements -Added section on character defining features,further expanded in supplement below Examples of Architectural Styles in the Country Club District -new resource to supplement the Plan of Treatment,which provides photos and lists character-defining features for the seven most prevalent Period Revival architectural styles in the Country Club District.This guide emphasizes that each house is a unique blend of architectural elements –and even of architectural styles –that adds embellishments of local tastes and style. Page 11 of 78 ORDINANCE NO. 2023-______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2, CHAPTER 10, AND CHAPTER 36 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 2, Article III, Division 5 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: DIVISION 5. – HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Sec. 2-184. Policy and establishment. The council finds that historically significant buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts represent scarce, nonrenewable heritage resources that are critical assets for community development; that heritage preservation is an important public service and a legitimate responsibility of city government; and that the preservation, protection and enhancement of significant heritage resources for the benefit of present and future citizens is a public necessity. Therefore, pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 471.193, the council continues the heritage preservation commission as the city's heritage preservation commission. Sec. 2-185. Purpose. The commission shall assist and advise the council, manager, and other city commissions on all matters relating to heritage-resource preservation and protection. The commission shall safeguard the significant heritage resources of the city by identifying significant heritage resources and nominating them for designation by the council as city heritage landmarks; by developing and maintaining a comprehensive preservation plan; by reviewing and deciding on applications for Certificates of Appropriateness in relation to properties designated as city heritage landmarks; and by encouraging the preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction of significant heritage resources through public education. Sec. 2-186. Definitions. Unless otherwise stated, or unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning, the words or phrases in the following list of definitions shall, for the purposes of this division, have the meanings indicated: Page 12 of 78 Addition. Any act or process which changes the exterior architectural features of a building or structure by adding to, joining with, or increasing the size or capacity of the structure. Certificate of appropriateness. An application and certificate issued by the Heritage Preservation Commission showing the proposed work is appropriate and does not adversely affect an Edina Heritage Landmark, historic resource or property within an Edina Heritage Landmark district. Certificate of appropriateness permit. A permit required at the time of a building permit application that is tied to the certificate of appropriateness. City planner means city staff member responsible for zoning administration. Character defining feature. The distinguishing features of a building, structure, object, site or district, which were present during the period of significance and help convey its historical significance. Examples of character-defining features are outlined in a supplemental document with the Plan of Treatment for Edina Heritage Landmarks and Landmark Districts. Construction. The act of altering an existing structure, building an addition to an existing structure, or the erection of a new principal building or accessory structure on a lot or property. Contributing. A designation applied to a building, structure or site within a historic district identifying that the resource adds to the overall character and significance of the district due to its architectural or historical merit related to the district’s significance. A contributing structure has its major character- defining features intact, although alterations may have occurred. Historic materials may have been covered, but evidence indicates they are intact. Demolition. Any act that destroys, replaces or removes more than 50% of the area of the exterior walls. The exterior wall surface shall include the following: - The existing framed exterior wall - The wood framed part of a walkout basement - Door surface area - Window surface area The exterior wall surface shall not include the following: - Roof area-if roof is being replaced with same pitch and height - Exposed foundation area - Garage exterior walls - Replacement of windows or doors within their existing framing (without enlargement) Page 13 of 78 The 50% requirement shall not include areas of the structure that are unanticipated discoveries or are determined as necessary to be removed by the city building official, after issuance of a building permit. When professional judgment deems that removal of parts of a structure is necessary to keep it structurally sound, an inspection and a report documenting the reasons by the building official is required. Exterior walls that become interior walls due to remodel/addition are counted towards the 50% when determining demolition. Demolition by Neglect. Failure to maintain, repair, or secure a historic resource that results in deterioration of the resource, the loss of structural integrity of the resource, and/or water intrusion, mold growth, pest infestation, dilapidation, or decay. Edina Heritage Landmark or city heritage landmark means any heritage resource so designated by the council as significant in history, architecture, archelogy, or culture and therefore worthy of preservation and consideration in city planning. Evaluation means the process of determining whether identified potential heritage resources meet defined criteria of historical, architectural, archeological, or cultural significance. Heritage preservation commission means the heritage preservation advisory commission appointed by the council. Heritage Resource or Historic Resource means any prehistoric or historic building, site, structure, object or district that has historical, architectural, archeological or cultural value to the citizens of the city, the state or the United States. Heritage District or Historic District. A contiguous area designated as a “Historic District” by ordinance of the City Council according to the criteria and pursuant to the procedures established within this Chapter. Historic Significance. Meeting the eligibility criteria as a heritage resource; having importance as part of the development, heritage or culture of the community as the location of an important event, or through strong association with a historically significant person or persons, or through notable architectural or engineering merit. Material Change. A change to a character defining feature as outlined in the Plan of Treatment. Page 14 of 78 New Construction. The building of a new principal building or new detached garage within the historic district or on an Edina Heritage Landmark site. Period of Significance. The length of time when a property or district was associated with important events, activities, or persons. Plan of Treatment. A document created for each heritage landmark or landmark district that includes guidelines for design review with recommendations for preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. Preservation means the act or process of applying treatments to sustain the existing form, structure, integrity, and material of a heritage resource. Reconstruction means the act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure or object as it appeared during a specific period of time. Rehabilitation means the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair or alteration while preserving those portions or features of the property which area significant to its historical architectural archeological or cultural values. Restoration means the act or process of accurately recovering the form and details of a heritage resource and its setting as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of removal of later work or by the replacement of missing historic features. Street Facing Facade. All portions of a primary structure’s facade that directly face a public street. Survey means the physical search for a recording of heritage resources that result in an inventory of buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts identifying resources worthy of consideration in city planning and resources that do not appear to have historic significance at that time. Sec. 2-187. Duties and responsibilities. The commission shall: (1) Advise the council, manager, and other city commissions and provide leadership for implementing the heritage preservation regulations. Page 15 of 78 (2) Develop and maintain a comprehensive plan for heritage resource preservation to ensure that community development policies and decisions respect the city's heritage and promote stewardship of heritage resources. (3) Conduct an ongoing survey of historic buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts and maintain an inventory of the heritage resources in the city. (4) Conduct evaluations to determine the eligibility of heritage resources for designation as heritage landmarks and heritage landmark districts. (5) Nominate heritage resources for designation as city heritage landmarks by the city council. (6) Review and decide on certificate of appropriateness applications in relation to heritage landmarks and heritage landmark districts. (7) Review and make recommendations to the planning commission on development projects that affect properties designated as heritage landmarks or determined eligible for designation as heritage landmarks. (8) Inform and educate citizens about the city's heritage and the benefits of preservation. (9) Develop regulatory and incentive programs that facilitate heritage preservation. (10) Adopt rules of procedure, subject to council approval, to guide the commission's deliberations. Sec. 2-188. Membership. (a) Commission membership. The commission shall consist of nine regular members and two student members. Members shall have a demonstrated interest, knowledge, ability or expertise in heritage preservation. At least one member shall be a qualified professional historian, architect, architectural historian, archeologist, planner, or the owner of a heritage landmark property. (b) City historical society membership. A member of the commission shall be a member of the city historical society. (c) County historical society membership. A member of the commission shall be a member of the county historical society. Sec. 2-189. Professional staff. The manager shall provide the commission with professional staff with expertise in heritage preservation. Sec. 2-190. Repository for documents. The office of the manager shall be the repository for all minutes, reports, studies, plans and other official documents produced by the commission. Page 16 of 78 Sec. 2-191—2-218. Reserved. Section 2. Chapter 10, Article IV of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 10-112. Permit Requirements for Heritage Landmark Properties or Properties within a Heritage Landmark District. For projects that require a building permit for exterior work on an Edina Heritage Landmark property or properties within an Edina Landmark District and have a building permit valuation of over one-hundred thousand ($100,000), the applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow of Fifteen Thousand ($15,000) Dollars. This includes projects that don’t require a certificate of appropriateness. For projects that required a certificate of appropriateness and a building permit for exterior work on an Edina Heritage Landmark property or property within an Edina Landmark District and have a building permit valuation under one hundred thousand ($100,000), the applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow of three thousand ($3,000) dollars. The City may draw on the cash escrow to keep individually designated structures and resources in historic districts (contributing and non-contributing) weather tight and protected, to comply with other city ordinances, and for reinspection fees. If the City draws on the cash escrow, upon the City’s demand the permit holder must deposit in escrow additional funds to restore the escrowed amount to fifteen thousand ($15,000) or three thousand ($3,000) Dollars. The cash escrow must remain in place until the work under the permit for which the escrow was made has been completed and all associated permits have been closed. The project must be completed per the approved building permit and/or plans approved with a certificate of appropriateness. Sec. 10-113. - Stop work orders. If the building official finds any work being performed in a dangerous or unsafe manner or that is in violation of the provisions of the permits, this Code or the state building code, the building official may issue a stop work order. The stop work order must be in writing and issued to the permit holder or the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order, the cited work must immediately cease. The stop work order must state the reason for the order and the conditions under which the cited work will be permitted to resume. Sec. 10-114. - Misdemeanor. Violations of this article or of the terms of approval of a permit issued under this article may be deemed a misdemeanor. Secs. 10-115 - 10-139. - Reserved. Page 17 of 78 Section 3. Chapter 36, Article IX of the City Code is amended to read as follows: ARTICLE IX. - EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARKS Sec. 36-713. Purpose. The zoning classification of Edina Heritage Landmark is established to promote the preservation, protection, and use of significant heritage resources in the city. Heritage landmarks shall be nominated by the heritage preservation commission and designated by council resolution. Unless otherwise stated, the list of definitions in section 2-186 shall govern this article. Sec. 36-714. Eligibility criteria. The following criteria will guide the heritage preservation commission and the council in evaluating potential heritage landmark designations: (1) The quality of significance in history, architecture, archeology and culture present in buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts that reflects: a. Association with important events or patterns of events that reflect significant broad patterns in local history; b. Association with the lives of historically significant persons or groups significant; c. Embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style, design, period, type or method of construction; or that possess high artistic values, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or d. Important archeological data or the potential to yield important archeological data. (2) The retention of specific aspects of historical integrity, including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, that convey significance as a heritage resource worthy of preservation. Sec. 36-715. Determination of eligibility. The heritage preservation commission shall review the inventory of heritage resources and evaluate the significance of all properties identified by survey. If it determines that a surveyed heritage resource appears to meet at least one of the heritage landmark eligibility criteria and retains sufficient historic integrity, the heritage preservation commission may, by majority vote, issue a determination of eligibility for planning purposes. Sec. 36-716. Nomination of a heritage landmark. Nomination of a property to be considered for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark shall be submitted to the council by the heritage preservation commission. Each nomination shall be accompanied by a heritage landmark nomination study prepared by the city planner. This study shall: (1) Identify and describe in detail the heritage resource being nominated; Page 18 of 78 (2) Make a case for historical significance by explaining how the property meets one or more of the heritage landmark eligibility criteria; (3) Determine that the resource retains sufficient historic integrity; (4) Recommend a plan of treatment for the heritage resource, with guidelines for design review and specific recommendations for preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction, as appropriate; and (5) Identify the resource’s character defining features. The study shall be accompanied by a map that clearly locates the property, a detailed plan of the nominated heritage resource, and archival quality photographs that document significant features of the building, site, structure, object, or district. Sec. 36-717. State Historic Preservation Office review. The city planner shall submit all heritage landmark nominations to the state historic preservation officer for review and comment within 60 days. Sec. 36-718. Planning Commission review. The city planner shall submit all heritage landmark nominations to the city planning commission for review and recommendations prior to any council action. Sec. 36-719. Public hearing. On receipt of the heritage landmark nomination documents and the comments of the state historic preservation office and the city planning commission, the council shall hold a public hearing to consider the proposed landmark designation. Sec. 36-720. City council designation. The council may designate a property as an Edina Heritage Landmark by resolution. Sec. 36-721. Plan of Treatment The Heritage Preservation Commission and City Council have adopted a Plan of Treatment document for each Heritage Landmark Property or District to assist in the administering of this ordinance. The Plan of Treatments are incorporated by reference into this ordinance. In case of a conflict, the Historic Preservation Ordinance shall govern. The Plan of Treatment may be amended from time to time by resolution. Page 19 of 78 Sec. 36-722. Review of Land Use Applications. To ensure compliance with the goals and policies of the comprehensive heritage preservation plan, the heritage preservation commission shall review every application for a preliminary plat, conditional use permit, variance or rezoning, in relation to a designated heritage landmark; and the city planning commission shall give the heritage preservation commission a reasonable opportunity to comment on such projects before making its recommendation to the council. Sec. 36-723. – Certificate of Appropriateness – When Required in a Heritage Landmark District. (a) Certificate of Appropriateness. Except as provided herein, a certificate of appropriateness is required prior to making any of the following changes to a site located within a heritage landmark district: (1) Removal, modification, or addition to character-defining features on street facing facades as defined in Sec. 2-186 (2) Replacement of exterior materials that are not in-kind replacement (3) The addition of and/or replacement of windows that are not the same size, shape and kind on street facing facades as defined in Sec. 2-186 (4) The addition of and/or replacement of doors that are not the same size and shape on street facing facades as defined in Sec. 2-186 (5) Demolition of an existing detached garage and the construction of a new detached garage (6) An addition to a street facing facade as defined in Sec. 2-186 (7) Change in pitch or height of a roofline visible from the street as defined in Sec. 2-186 (8) Demolition of a contributing resource (to designate as a non-preservation resource) structure (9) Design and construction of a new home within a historic district. This includes the demolition and new construction for properties built outside the period of significance (b) City Actions. City activities (including but not limited to activities on city property or in the city right-of-way) shall not require a certificate of appropriateness provided that the Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council concerning city activity that could change the historic integrity of a site located within a historic district. (c) Exempt Work. The following types of projects shall not require a Certificate of Appropriateness: Page 20 of 78 (1) Ordinary maintenance, such as repainting. (2) In-kind replacement of exterior materials, such as replacement of deteriorated wood lap siding with new wood lap siding or replacement of windows and doors of the same shape, size, and type. (3) Work affecting only the interior of a structure. (4) Furnishings and moveable items, such as window boxes, light fixtures, shutters. (5) Site work, including retaining walls, fences, and pools. (6) Items that do not require a building permit. (d) City Permits. In addition to a Certificate of Appropriateness required by section 36-723(a), applicants must also obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness permit and all other necessary permits required by City Code or other City ordinances for the proposed work. Sec. 36- 724 – Certificate of Appropriateness – When required for a Heritage Landmark Property. (a) Certificate of Appropriateness. Except as provided herein, a Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to making any of the following changes to a landmark property: (1) Demolition of any building or structure, as defined in 2-186. (2) Moving a building or structure to another location. (3) Excavation of archeological features, grading, earth moving in areas believed to contain significant buried heritage resources. (4) New construction as defined in 2-186. (b) City Actions. City activities (including but not limited to activities on city property or in the city right-of-way) shall not require a certificate of appropriateness provided that the Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council concerning city activity that could change the historic integrity of a site located within a historic district. (e) City Permits. In addition to a Certificate of Appropriateness required by section 36-723(a), applicants must also obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness permit and all other necessary permits required by City Code or other City ordinances for the proposed work. Sec. 36-725. – Certificate of Appropriateness Process and Criteria. (a) Preapplication meeting with city planner. (b) Application. An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall include all information that the City Planner and the Commission determine is necessary for a complete application, including, but not limited to, photographs of the existing structure, scaled plans and written description fully describing the proposed work and information about the building materials to be used, and drawings or photographs showing the property Page 21 of 78 in the context of its surroundings. Following receipt of a complete application and all supporting documentation including fee established by resolution of the Council, the City Planner shall begin the review process. (b) Providing Notice. Notices of a review of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the Heritage Preservation Commission shall be sent to properties in the same manner outlined in Sec.36-97 a & c. (c) Commission Review. The Commission may approve, approve with conditions, continue or deny in whole, or part, an application. Subject to the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 15.99, the Commission may continue consideration of an application if it finds that additional documentation or expert technical advice from outside its membership is needed to properly evaluate the application. All findings and decisions of the Commission shall be final, subject to appeal to the City Council as specified in section 36-728. (d) Action by Commission. If the Commission approves the application, it shall direct the City Planner to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness subject to such conditions as established by the Commission. The Commission shall notify the applicant of their right to appeal and furnish the applicant with a copy of the decision. (e) Time Limitation. Upon issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness the recipient must apply for a building permit and certificate of appropriateness permit within 12 months. (1) A one-time extension may be granted by the Commission for a period up to 12 months from the date of expiration provided that: a. The original Certificate of Appropriateness has not expired at the time of application for an extension is filed; and b. The site or building conditions have not changed on the subject property and adjacent properties. (2) Upon expiration or expiration of an extension, the applicant must reapply for a Certificate of Appropriateness. (f) Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria. In making a determination whether to approve or deny an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Commission shall be guided by the following criteria: (1) Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation. (2) Plan of Treatment documents – the design guidelines and standards listed in the Plan of Treatment. (3) Additional criteria for proposed alterations within designated historic districts. Before approving a Certificate of Appropriateness to a property within an historic district, the Commission (or City Council on appeal) shall make the following findings: Page 22 of 78 a. The alteration is compatible with and will ensure continued significance and integrity of all contributing properties in the historic district based on the period of significance for which the district was designated. b. Granting the Certificate of Appropriateness will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance and will not negatively alter the essential character of the historic district or landmark property. (4) Criteria for moving and demolition is located in section 36-726 of this Chapter. (g) Changes to Approved Certificate of Appropriateness. (1) Minor changes. Minor changes to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness may be authorized by the City Planner where it is determined by the City Planner that the proposed changes are not changes to character defining features and are consistent with the approval made by the Commission. (2) Other changes. Changes to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness other than changes set forth in (1) above determined by the City Planner to be minor are considered material changes and shall require an amendment to the Certificate of Appropriateness by the Commission. The requirements for application and approval of an amended Certificate of Appropriateness shall be the same as the requirements for original approval, including a fee. Sec. 36-726. – Demolition or Relocation. (a) Purpose. The demolition or relocation of historic resources is deemed detrimental to the public interest and shall only be permitted pursuant to prescriptions of this section. (b) Concept Review. Prior to submission of a formal Certificate of Appropriateness application seeking demolition approval, a concept plan may be submitted for the purpose of obtaining the Commission’s comments and recommendations prior to the owner spending significant time and expense in the preparation of reuse plans when applying for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition or moving of a historic resource. (1) The property owner requesting a concept review shall submit preliminary drawings of any proposed building or addition, current photographs of the property and reasons for the requested demolition or moving of the historic resource. (2) After discussion with the owner, the Commission may provide preliminary feedback on the proposed reuse of the property and the removal or demolition of the historic resource. The Commission’s comments on such a concept plan shall not be binding on any subsequent certificate of appropriateness applications seeking demolition approval. Page 23 of 78 (c) Engineering study. In any case involving the demolition or relocation of a historic resource, before granting approval, the Commission may require a structural engineer, or historic preservation architect, at the owner’s expense, to provide them with a report on the state of repair and structural stability of the structure under consideration. (d) Demolition or relocation criteria. In determining the appropriateness of any application for the demolition or relocation of a landmark or contributing building in a historic district, the Commission shall use the following criteria: (1) The architectural significance of the building or structure. (2) The historical significance of the building or structure. (3) The condition and structural integrity of the building or structure, as indicated by documentation prepared by a qualified professional or licensed contractor, or other information, provided to the Commission for examination. (4) Effect on surrounding historic properties. (5) Effect on the historic district if a contributing building is in a historic district. (e) Additional Matters Considered. In addition to the general criteria listed in section 36- 725(g), the applicant must also demonstrate: (1) If requesting relocation, that structure can be moved without significant damage to its integrity of design, materials, and workmanship and the applicant can show the relocation activity is the best preservation method for the retention of the structure. (2) If requesting relocation, whether the resource is on its original site. (3) If requesting relocation, that the structure will retain sufficient historic integrity in its new location to remain a historic landmark. (f) If the Commission denies application, the Commission shall notify the applicant of their right to appeal and furnish the applicant with a copy of the decision. Demolition Permit. No permit to demolish a landmark, a contributing or non-contributing resource may be issued without the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness and certificate of appropriateness permit for a replacement structure or project for the property involved. Sec. 36-727. Appeals. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the heritage preservation commission, or an administrative official may appeal such decision by filing a written appeal with the city clerk no later than ten calendar days after the decision of the heritage preservation commission or the administrative official. If not so filed, the right of appeal shall be deemed waived, and the decision of the heritage preservation commission or administrative official shall be final. Upon receipt of the appeal, the city clerk shall transmit a copy of said appeal to the heritage preservation commission. The council shall hear and decide all appeals in the manner provided by section 36-100. Page 24 of 78 Sec. 36-728. – Emergency Repair. In emergency situations where immediate repair is needed to protect the safety of a building or structure and its inhabitants, the City Planner, City Building Official, Community Health Administrator or Fire Chief may approve the repair or demolition without prior Commission action. Emergencies are defined as life or health threatening conditions requiring immediate attention, as determined by the City Building Official, Fire Chief, or Community Health Administrator. In the case of an emergency repair permit issued pursuant to this section, the City Planner shall notify the Commission of its action and specify the facts or condition constituting the emergency situation. Sec. 36-729. – Maintenance of Heritage Resources. Owners of historic resources shall keep such resources in good condition and repair and not allow their buildings or structures to deteriorate by neglect (i.e. failing to provide ordinary maintenance or repair.) (a) The Building Official and Community Health Administrator shall have the authority to monitor the condition of historic resources to determine if they are being allowed to deteriorate by neglect. Such conditions as broken windows, doors and openings which allow the elements to enter, the deterioration of exterior character-defining features, or the deterioration of a building’s structural system shall constitute failure to provide ordinary maintenance or repair. (b) In the event the Building Official or Community Health Administrator determines that there has been a failure to provide ordinary maintenance or repair, the Building Official or Community Health Administrator will notify the owner of the property and set forth the steps necessary to comply with the provisions of the Building Code and City Code Sec. 36-730. – Enforcement. (a) In case any building or structure subject to the regulation of this ordinance is to be erected or constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, maintained, moved, or subjected to demolition in violation with this ordinance, the City Planner, Building Official, or Community Health Administrator in addition to any other remedies, may: (1) Institute civil action for injunctive relief to stop, prevent, or abate a violation of this ordinance. (2) Issue a stop work order to prevent a continuing violation of this ordinance. Page 25 of 78 DRAFT DRAFT Plan of Treatment Country Club District Project Design Criteria Edina Heritage Preservation Commission History The County Club District was platted in 1924 by Thorpe Brothers Realty Company and the majority of the homes were constructed between 1924 and 1941. The Edina Country Club District was one of the first modern planned communities in Minnesota and the land use controls exercised by the original Country Club Association later formed the basis of Edina’s first zoning ordinance. Samuel Thorpe carefully designed every aspect of the neighborhood to include heavily tree- lined streets and parks, as well as uniform building and design restrictions. Unique to the times, Thorpe ensured that all major utilities were installed before the lots were placed on market, ensuring that the neighborhood was developed according to his plan. Additional restrictions dictated minimum home values and required that all building plans were reviewed by the Country Club Neighborhood Association, which Thorpe led. Page 26 of 78 2 DRAFT The district represents a significant, well-preserved concentration of historic architecture and related historic landscape design. Examples of English Cottage (Tudor), Colonial Revival, Mediterranean (Spanish Colonial Revival), and Italian Renaissance Revival style homes predominate. Purpose and Objective The primary objective of the Country Club Heritage Landmark District is protecting the historic integrity of the neighborhood. The preferred treatment for properties in the Country Club District is rehabilitation, which is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to property owners, architects, builders, designers, and the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) in determining appropriate exterior treatment of properties within the Country Club District. Understanding the Country Club District The district was listed on the National Register Historic Places and designated as an Edina Heritage Resource District because of its significance in community planning, zoning, and suburban residential development, as well as the distinctive architectural characteristics of the neighborhood. While there are not any properties that are designated as landmark properties individually, individual homes contribute to the overall historic character of the district. Period of significance The period of significance in the Country Club District is 1924-1944 which is the period when the developer enforced rigid architectural standards on new home construction through restrictive covenants. Homes built in this period are considered heritage preservation resources. Heritage preservation resources may not be demolished unless the applicant can show that the subject property is not a heritage preservation resource, or no longer contributes to the historical significance of the district because its historic integrity has been compromised by deterioration, damage, or by inappropriate additions or alterations. Except in extraordinary circumstances involving threats to public health or safety, no Certificate of Appropriateness will be issued for the demolition of an existing house built between 1924-1944 in the district without an approved design plan for new construction. Houses built outside of the period of significance contribute to the overall character of the district and are still required to adhere to the Design Criteria and associated processes, including certificate of appropriateness applications. Page 27 of 78 3 DRAFT Character Defining Features Character defining features are the distinguishing elements of a building, structure, object, site or district, which were present during the period of significance and help convey its historical significance. A project should be developed so that the property’s character defining features on street facing facades are not radically changed, obscured, damaged, or destroyed. Character defining features in the Country Club District may include: ● Exterior materials including siding and roofing ● Building form and massing ● Spatial relationships ● Roof shapes ● Roof details ● Openings for windows and doors ● Projections-porches, turrets, bay windows, vestibules ● Chimneys ● Dormers *For lists of character defining features for architectural styles prevalent in the Country Club District, see the “Examples of Architectural Styles in The Country Club District” Document* Architectural Styles prevalent in the district include Colonial Revival Style, Tudor Style, French Eclectic Style, Italian Renaissance Style, Spanish Eclectic, Prairie Style, and Craftsman style. Character defining features may vary based on the style of the home. More specific information on architectural styles can be found in the book, “A Field Guide to American Houses,” by Virginia & Lee McAlester. Copies are available for viewing in the planning department. Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) A certificate of appropriateness is required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the following types of projects in the Country Club District: 1. Removal, modifications or additions to character defining features on street facing facades (not including moveable items such as flower boxes or ironwork details, etc.) 2. Replacement of exterior materials that are not in-kind replacement 3. The addition of and/or replacement of windows that are not the same size, shape and kind on street facing facades as defined in Sec. 2-186 4. The addition of and/or replacement of doors that are not the same size and shape on street facing facades as defined in Sec. 2-186 5. Demolition of an existing garage and/or the construction of a new garage 6. An addition to a street facing facade 7. Change in pitch or height of a roofline visible from a street facing facade 8. Demolition of a historic resource Page 28 of 78 4 DRAFT 9. Design and construction of a new home A COA is valid for one year from the date of approval by the HPC. A building permit and certificate of appropriateness permit for a project that needs a COA must be applied for within 12 months of COA approval. An applicant may request, and the city may extend this period when specified with an application. The applicant may request an extension either during the COA application or after the issuance of a COA, prior to the one-year period ending. An extension to a COA is required to be requested in writing and approved by the HPC at a meeting. Examples of Projects exempt from a COA: ● Ordinary maintenance including repainting, and residing, or reroofing with like materials as reviewed and approved by city staff ● Work affecting only the interior of a structure ● Movable items such as window boxes, light fixtures, or shutters ● Replacing existing windows with windows of the same size and shape ● Site work including retaining walls, fences and pools ● Items that do not require a building permit Permits The applicant is responsible for pulling all required city permits. A certificate of appropriateness permit is tied to the COA approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission and is required at the time of building permit application. Application Requirements A COA application and associated materials need to be submitted to the city and must provide sufficient information for review. A preapplication meeting with city staff is required prior to a COA submittal. Proposed elevations and a proposed survey should be sent to staff prior to the pre-application meeting. Application requirements include: ● Completed COA form ● Application fee ● Narrative explaining the project and explanation of how the project meets the Project Design Criteria ● Elevations or photos of all four sides of the existing structure Page 29 of 78 5 DRAFT ● One copy of the exterior elevations of the entire facade to scale detailing the proposed work. Proposed elevations should include an inventory of proposed and existing materials ● Existing survey of subject property ● Proposed survey of subject property showing the proposed changes (see the city’s survey policy for more information on survey requirements) ● Elevation drawings showing the walls proposed to be removed or rebuilt during construction and details showing how walls will be rebuilt if necessary ● Elevation drawings to scale showing the proposed project in context with the properties on either side of the subject property ● COA escrow fee acknowledgement form signed by property owner and COA applicant Review Process Review by the HPC A COA application will be reviewed by city staff and the city’s preservation consultant. A staff recommendation will be included in the meeting packet for the review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Decisions are made by the HPC and may be appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the HPC decision. Request for a COA Amendment It is the responsibility of the homeowner and COA applicant to build to the plans shown and approved with the issued COA. If there are proposed changes to an approved plan, it is the responsibility of the homeowner and COA applicant to inform staff of proposed changes to approved plans. Depending on the proposed change, it may require review by the HPC. If an amendment is required, a complete application showing the proposed changes will be required. (complete application also requires an additional COA fee) *Depending on the project, a COA escrow fee may be required at the time of building permit. If the project elevations do not meet the approved COA elevations at the time of a final building inspection, the COA escrow fee will not be released to the applicant until the built elevations match the approved plans, or a COA amendment has been approved by the HPC. * Secretary of the Interior’s Standards of Rehabilitation The City has adopted the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards of Rehabilitation as the basis for the Commission’s design review decisions. The Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation are neither technical nor prescriptive but are intended to promote preservation best practices and are regulatory with respect to certificate of appropriateness review. Page 30 of 78 6 DRAFT ● A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. ● The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. ● Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. ● Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. ● Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. ● Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. ● Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. ● Archaeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. ● New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. ● New additions and adjacent new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment will be unimpaired. New Construction Guidelines GARAGES Modernistic designs for new detached garages will be discouraged. New detached garages should complement the architectural style of the house on the same lot as well as the historic character of the neighborhood. The following are guidelines to help in design and review of plans for new garages: ● The new garage should be subordinate to the house in scale and massing. The preferred placement is at the rear of the lot or set back from the front of the house to minimize the visual impact on adjacent homes and streetscapes. Page 31 of 78 7 DRAFT ● Front facing attached garages are discouraged. No new detached garage should be taller, longer, or wider than the house on the same lot. ● Undecorated exterior walls longer than 16 feet should be avoided on elevations visible from the street or adjacent properties. ● New garages should be clearly identified as such by means of a plaque or inscription (to be placed on an exterior surface) bearing the year of construction. NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION New home construction will be limited to existing residential lots and their design will be compatible with the original (1924-1944) Country Club District deed restrictions relating to architecture. The following guidelines generally reflect the principles of the deed restrictions and will be applied by the Heritage Preservation Commission for design review of plans for new houses: ● Size, Scale & Massing - New homes should be compatible in size, scale, massing, orientation, setback with historic buildings in the district constructed prior to 1945. ● Architectural Style- New homes should utilize the colors and exterior finishes of historic buildings in the district constructed prior to 1945. Facades should be architecturally similar to existing historic homes and visually relate to the historic facades of nearby homes; radically contrasting façade designs will not be allowed. ● Entrances, porches, and other projections should relate to the pattern of existing adjacent historic homes and respect the rhythm and continuity of similar features along the street. ● Roof forms should be consistent with typical roof forms of existing historic homes in terms of pitch, orientation, and complexity. ● Year Built Identification - New homes should be clearly identified as such by means of a plaque or inscription (to be placed on an exterior surface) bearing the year of construction. GUIDELINES FOR ALL PROPERTY OWNERS Accessory Mechanical Equipment - Mechanical equipment, solar panels, air conditioners, satellite dishes, and antennae should be concealed whenever possible or placed in an inconspicuous location so as not to intrude or detract from historic facades and streetscapes. Decks & Accessory Structures - Contemporary designs are acceptable for decks and accessory structures so long as they are not visible from the street. Page 32 of 78 8 DRAFT Landscaping Elements - Landscaping such as retaining walls, planters, fences, planting beds, and walkways, should be visually compatible with the historic character of the district in size, scale, material, texture, and color. Retaining walls should follow the grade of the lot and blend with the historic streetscape. DISTRICT RE-SURVEY The City will arrange for a re-survey of the Edina Country Club District every ten years to document changes in the appearance and historic integrity of historic properties; to revise the list of heritage preservation resources and non-heritage preservation resources present within the district boundaries; and to revise the district plan of treatment as needed. Page 33 of 78 Examples of Architectural Styles in Edina’s Country Club District The Eclectic movement, also known as period revival architecture, began in the late 1800s when architects recreated old European styles for wealthy clients. This movement gave way to Modern styles such as Craftsman and Prairie at the turn of the century. But by the 1920s, when the Country Club District was created, new construction techniques for adding stone veneer made it much more affordable to mimic Old World facades and the Eclectic movement surged. The period revival architectural styles used most frequently in the District are: Colonial Revival Style Tudor Style French Eclectic Style Italian Renaissance Style Spanish Eclectic Prairie Style Craftsman Style This guide describes character defining features of these seven styles, although most of the homes in the Country Club are not “pure” specimens of any particular style, so we should not expect them to follow any of the “rules” laid out in architecture textbooks. Local builders and their clients developed their own rules of style, based on prevailing notions of taste and convenience. The typical house melds vernacular cottage dwelling forms with high-style detailing. The “style” of any given property is often expressed through applied ornamentation using decorative elements borrowed from one, two, or more architectural styles. Decorative shutters, for example, are a traditional feature of Colonial Revival architecture, but in the District we find non-functional wooden shutters on examples of Tudor and Spanish Eclectic period architecture. The one-story side sun porch is also nearly ubiquitous and, like the shutters, reflects 1920s-1930s notions of middle-class taste rather than the dictates of any particular architectural style. Each home is unique in its blend of style and details, contributing to a neighborhood that showcases the varied architecture of the Eclectic movement. Each project requiring a certificate of appropriateness will be evaluated on the property’s historic design, not necessarily how well it meets or does not meet the definition of a particular style. More information on architectural terms and styles can be found in “A Field Guide to American Houses,” by Virginia & Lee McAlester. Copies are available for viewing in the planning department. Page 34 of 78 Colonial Revival Style (one of the District’s dominant styles, has subtypes such as Georgian or Dutch Colonial) ● 2 to 2½ stories high ● Side-gabled roof (sometimes with abbreviated cornice returns) ● Boxed roof-wall junction (sometimes decorated with dentils) ● Horizontal boards or brick veneer wall cladding ● Symmetrical fenestration (i.e., balanced arrangement of windows and center doorway) ● Projecting entry portico (i.e., a small open porch) with a gabled or flat roof ● Accentuated front door, normally with decorative crown (pediment), sidelights, or overhead fanlights ● Gabled roof dormers (sometimes through the cornice) ● Double-hung window sash with multi-pane glazing ● 1 story side porch (sun room) 4531 Casco Ave. Page 35 of 78 Tudor Style (another prevalent style, includes categories of English Cottage and English Tudor used in the 1980 submission to the National Register of Historic Places) ● 1½ to 2½ stories high ● Multiple gable or hip roof shapes, usually steeply pitched ● Stucco (occasionally brick veneer) wall cladding, often contrasted with stone or brick trim ● Façade dominated by one or more projecting gables, often overlapping the roofs of projecting entry vestibules ● Decorative (false) half-timbering, most often on second story walls ● Massive chimneys (often attached to the front wall) ● Tall, narrow windows (double-hung and casement windows), often in multiple groups, with multi-pane glazing ● Steeply pitched gable dormers, overhanging second story roof dormers, oriel windows, and bay windows ● Stone trim around entries (usually arched) ● 1 story side porch (sun room) ● Porte-cocheres and garden gates 4610 Browndale Ave Page 36 of 78 French Eclectic Style (as used here, refers to houses categorized as “Norman” and “French Provincial” in the 1980 National Register form; occasionally hybridized with Colonial Revival, Tudor and/or Mediterranean period style elements) ● 2 stories high ● Hipped roofs ● Brick, stucco or mixed materials wall cladding (sometimes with patterned stonework, brickwork or quoins) ● Arched window openings (sometimes with hood molds) ● Arched, hipped, or gabled roof dormers (tops sometimes break the roof-line) ● Round towers or “turrets” 4513 Edina Blvd Page 37 of 78 Italian Renaissance Style (encompasses houses categorized as “Mediterranean” and “Italian Renaissance Revival” in the 1980 National Register form) ● 2 stories high (often with 1 or 2 story wing) ● Hipped roof (low pitch) with wide eaves ● Green or red tile roofing ● Arches above door and window openings ● Upper story windows smaller, less elaborate than first story ● Small projecting entry porticos or porches with flat roofs and balustrades ● Stucco or brick veneer wall cladding ● Tall, narrow windows in pairs (“French windows”) ● Wrought-iron grillwork (balconets) under windows ● Raised terrace (“patio”) with wrought-iron or concrete balustrade in front, next to entry ● Balustrades on entry and side porches (usually flat-roofed) ● 1 story side sun porch (sun room) 4513 Wooddale Ave Page 38 of 78 Spanish Eclectic (as used here, refers to houses categorized as “Mediterranean” in the 1980 National Register form; includes houses showing the influence of the Mission Style) ● 1½ or 2 stories high ● Low-pitched roof with red tile covering ● Arches above door and window openings ● Asymmetrical massing ● Stucco wall cladding ● Flat-roofed front and side porches ● Large focal windows (arched) ● Wrought-iron grillwork (porch railings, window grilles, balconets) 4626 Arden Ave Page 39 of 78 Prairie Style (often occurring in hybrid forms with details borrowed from other styles) ● 2 stories high ● Low-pitched pyramidal hipped roof with wide eaves ● Stucco or brick wall cladding ● Horizontal rows of double-hung or casement windows ● Wide (“cottage”) double-hung windows on main floor ● 1 story porches ● Dormers 4604 Wooddale Ave Page 40 of 78 Craftsman (Arts & Crafts style features and detailing found on houses of all styles throughout the District) ● Decorative (false) beams, braces, or brackets under roof eaves ● Roofs with wide, unenclosed eaves ● Exposed roof rafters (non-structural) ● Partial width entry porches (enclosed) with front-gabled or hipped roofs ● Shed-roofed dormers ● Groups of three or more double-hung windows (often with multi-pane sash over one large glass pane, sometimes with transoms) ● Trellises and pergolas 4506 Browndale Ave Page 41 of 78 DRAFT EDINA LANDMARK PROPERTY& DISTRICT ESCROW FEE POLICY The construction on this site will follow normal industry and City accepted construction methods for a project of this type and, if applicable, will follow the approved certificate of appropriateness approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Specific items of concern will be addressed as noted below. Any references to start date or duration of specific items are estimated and included only for reference. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they are responsible for complying with the below conditions. __________________________________________ ________________ Signature of Contractor Date Site Contractor: __________________________ Address: _______________________________ Phone:_________________________________ Email Address: __________________________ The estimated construction start date is _________________________. The estimated completion date is ______________________________. Project Description: . Was a Certificate of Appropriateness Required? Yes COA#________ No Sec. 10-112. Permit Requirements for Heritage Landmark Properties or Properties within a Heritage Landmark District For projects that require a building permit that includes exterior work on a Edina Heritage Landmark property or properties within an Edina Landmark District and has a valuation of over one-hundred thousand ($100,000), the applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow of Fifteen Thousand ($15,000) Dollars. For projects that require a building permit that includes exterior work on an Edina Heritage Landmark property or property within an Edina Landmark District and has a valuation under one hundred thousand ($100,000) and/or is a project that required a certificate of appropriateness, the applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow of three thousand ($3,000) dollars. The City may draw on the cash escrow to keep structures weather tight and protected, to comply with other city ordinances, and reinspection fees. If the City draws on the cash escrow, upon the City’s demand the permit holder must deposit in escrow additional funds to restore the escrowed amount to fifteen thousand ($15,000) or three thousand ($3,000) Dollars. The cash escrow must remain in place until the work under the permit for which the escrow was made has been completed. The project must be completed per the approved building permit and/or plans submitted with a required certificate of appropriateness (COA). Project Name & Site Address Number (For Office Use Only) Permit Number Page 42 of 78 Sec. 10-113. Stop Work Orders. If the Building Official finds any work being performed in a dangerous or unsafe manner or that is in violation of the provisions of the permit, City Code or the State Building Code, the Building Official may issue a stop work order. The stop work order must be in writing and issued to the permit holder or the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order, the cited work must immediately cease. The stop work order must state the reason for the order and the conditions under which the cited work will be permitted to resume. Sec. 36-730. – Maintenance of Historic Resources. Owners of historic resources shall not allow their buildings to deteriorate by neglect (i.e. failing to provide ordinary maintenance or repair.) (a) The building official shall have the authority to monitor the condition of historic resources to determine if they are being allowed to deteriorate by neglect. Such conditions as broken windows, doors and openings which allow the elements to enter, the deterioration of exterior character defining features, or the deterioration of a building’s structural system shall constitute failure to provide ordinary maintenance or repair. (b) In the event the Building Official determines that there has been a failure to provide ordinary maintenance or repair, the Building Official will notify the owner of the property and set forth the steps necessary to comply with the provisions of the Building Code and City Code. Sec. 36-731. – Enforcement. (a) In case any building or structure subject to the regulation of this ordinance is to be erected or constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, maintained, moved, or subjected to demolition in violation with this ordinance, the City Planner or Building Official, in addition to any other remedies, may: (1) Institute civil action for injunctive relief to stop, prevent, or abate a violation of this ordinance. (2) Issue a stop work order to prevent a continuing violation of this ordinance. Page 43 of 78 Site Contractor:______________________________________________________________________________ Address:_____________________________________________________________________________________ Phone:_______________________________________________________________________________________ Email Address:_______________________________________________________________________________ The estimated construction start date is________________________________________________________ The estimate completion date is _______________________________________________________________ It is the responsibility of the homeowner and COA applicant to build to the plans shown and approved with the issued COA (if required). If there are proposed changes to an approved plan, it is the responsibility of the homeowner and applicant to inform staff of proposed changes to approved plans. Depending on the proposed change, it may require review by the HPC. *The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they are responsible for complying with the approved COA (if applicable) and the building permit. If the elevations or plans change, you need to contact city staff prior to the change being made. Some changes may require additional review. * ___________________ Date __________________________________ __________________________________ Signature of Contractor Signature of Contractor (printed) Owners of Historic Resources shall not allow their buildings to deteriorate by neglect (i.e. failing to provide ordinary maintenance and repair. Such conditions may include: broken windows, doors and openings which allow the elements to enter, the deterioration of exterior character defining features, or the deterioration of a building’s structural system. This includes the period of time during building construction. *The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they are responsible for maintaining protection of historic resources throughout the construction process. * ___________________ Date __________________________________ __________________________________ Signature of Contractor Signature of Contractor (printed) Page 44 of 78 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: August 12, 2024 Item Activity: Action Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda Number: 6.2 Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Department: Community Development Item Title: COA: 4501 Drexel Avenue, Changes to Street Facing Facade Action Requested: Staff recommends approval and denial of portions of the proposed work. Approval: The staff recommendation is to approve the changes to the west façade of the home at 4501 Drexel Avenue. Those changes include: -Replacing vertical siding with horizontal siding to match existing -Remove center bracket above the existing front door -Install a new front door with multi-light glass panels The changes on the north side of the home that staff and Hess Roise recommend approval include: -The additional egress window -The removal of the non-historic bay window, fill in the opening and side with siding material to match existing home. The recommendation for approval is based on the following: -The proposed work complies with the Country Club Plan of Treatment. Conditions of approval: Any change to the approved elevations or materials will need to be submitted for review. Denial: Staff recommends denial of the following proposed changes on the north elevation: -The removal of the historic bay window and install a wider pair of double hung windows with shutters The historic bay window should be retained and repaired if needed. -The removal of the non-historic window and install a wider set of three double hung windows with shutters. The window can be replaced with a new window, but the opening should remain the same size. Staff recommends denial of the above changes because the changes do not meet the plan of treatment and standards of rehabilitation. The bay window is a character defining feature of this home. The larger windows proposed will change the character defining fenestration on the north side of the home. Information/Background: The subject property, 4501 Drexel Avenue, is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Drexel Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The existing home on the lot is a two-story Colonial Revival home built in 1936. Page 45 of 78 The certificate of appropriateness application is for changes to street facing facades, specifically window changes on the north side of the home adjacent to Sunnyside Road. Better Together Page Supporting Documentation: 1. Applicant Submittal 2. Staff Report 3. Consultant Memo 4. Assessing File Photos Page 46 of 78 4501 Drexel Avenue July 8, 2021 Explanation of request: Replace arched kitchen window with bank of 3 double hung to match existing. Replace deteriorating dining room bay window with 2 double hung to match front dining room windows. Replace front deteriorating vertical sidinu with new horizontal to match existing siding. Replace deteriorating chutters with ow to match. Replace front door with new 314 glass door to match existing window muritin patterns, Add .new egress window and well on North corner of home. New windows to match existing French casement windows. Additional work to include kitchen and primary bath remodel. Page 47 of 78 4501 Drexel Avenue July 8, 2024 Explanation & Narrative The intention of the exterior improvements at 4501 Drexel Avenue is to address areas of deterioration - keeping materials the same or returning to original wherever possible. These exterior enhancements are aligned with an interior kitchen and primary bath remodel within their existing footprints. Room functionality and purpose remain unchanged. We are proposing a replacement of the front door with a new three-quarter glass door. The door will be solid wood like the existing with a muntin pattern to match existing windows. The existing vertical siding on a small portion of the front facade is deteriorating and in a state of disrepair. New lap siding on this small section to match existing will be installed in its place - keeping consistent with all other sides of the home. The arched kitchen window (not original to the home) will be replaced with a series of 3 double hung windows to match pattern of existing windows. The deteriorating dining room bay window (not original to the home) will be replaced with 2 double hung windows with matching proportions to the front dining room windows. Both of these window replacements bring the home closer to its original architecture and repeat existing window sizes on the exterior facade. All trim, siding and windows used will match what is existing. A new egress window and well on the North corner of the home will be added to create a 5th, legal bedroom in the lower level. The new egress windows will match the existing French casement windows already installed in the lower level. The deteriorating exterior shutters will be replaced with new ones to match what is existing. Sincerely, Ian Campbell Fiddleback Builders 612-702-2257 Page 48 of 78 LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: COA APPLICATION Date Issued: JULY 1, 2024 COA APPLICATION Revisions These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. Drawn By: EJL Existing Exterior Elevations AB2.0 Sheet No. ©2024 FINISHED CEILING FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED CEILING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FINISHED CEILING O -H FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED CEILING 9 6) FINISHED FLOOR (LOWER) FINSIHED CLG. (LOWER) c`1 1 (9 0 F- N-1 CONCRETE +1 +1 SLAB (LOWER) O cc +1 Existing West Elevation 9 *do +I "".(:9 Eo +1 FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) FINSIHED CLG. (UPPER) CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) PLYWOOD CEILING of -H TOP OF • SUBFLOOR BTM. EXPOSED STRUCTURE GARAGE SLAB FINISHED —.- CEILING Existing North Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED CEILING +I lc +I FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) • • FINSIHED CLG. (UPPER) o F-- +I +I CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) 0 +I -H Z-i cc Page 49 of 78 LNA Design I _J L L Of REMOVE 130.5 SQFT VERT. SIDING REMOVE CENTER BRACKET Existing West Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 11-0" — FINISHEDFINISHED CEILING 9 Co +1 FINISHED FLOOR +I FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) FINSIHED CLG. (UPPER) CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) n II fl fl I ii II I :4i • - I Existing North Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 11-0" REMOVE 11!MOVE REMOVE _17.5 SQEL 4 5 SQE11 J I_ a9 SQFT._ _WINDOWS_ JRAY_ _ _ BAY PLYWOOD CEILING TOP OF SUBFLOOR BTM. EXPOSED STRUCTURE GARAGE SLAB FINISHED CEILING CEILING 9 Co +I FINISHED FLOOR • FINISHED CEILING 1-1 0t FINISHED FLOOR (LOWER) FINSIHED CLG. (LOWER) co 0T-1 F-- CONCRETE +1 +1 SLAB (LOWER) 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: COA APPLICATION Date Issued: JULY 1, 2024 FINISHED 9 CEILING = (1: ,) 00 9 ;-1 COA APPLICATION El Revisions FINISHED —°- CEILING 9 00 +I FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED = CEILING ;Cf; 00, FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) FINSIBED CLG. (UPPER) („1 o -H +1 CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) 4. JULY 5, 2024 These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. Drawn By: EJL Existing Exterior Elevations (DEMO) AB2.1 Sheet No. ©2024 Page 50 of 78 tMl 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com .0 I II o it IL r I North Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. COA APPLICATION Revisions JULY 5, 2024 Drawn By: Exterior Elevations A2.0 Sheet No. © 2024 EJL LNA Design C fi Er NEW WINDOWS NEW OPENING NEW SHUTTERS MARVIN ULTIMATE DH1617 (22.5 SQFT OF WINDOWS) EXISTING GLASS BLOCK WINDOWS. WITH CONCRETE AND WELL CAPPED WITH BRICK PAVERS , 1 1 MI NEW WINDOWS NEW OPENING NEW SHUTTERS MATCH WEST FACADE WINDOWS (29.5 SQFT WINDOWS) NEW WINDOW NEW OPENING MARVIN UFC4040E (FRENCH CASEMENT) EGRESS Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: COA APPLICATION Date Issued: JULY 1, 2024 1 co NEW WINDOW WELL MODULAR BLOCK FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) --4' +1 (-9 cc CLG. IHED (UPPER) O +I NATURAL STONE CAP MATCH LANDSCAPING STONE CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) REPLACE VERTICAL SIDING WITH NEW SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW FRONT DOOR NEW NUMBER LOCATION - NEW LIGHTS (NO STORM) EXISTING WINDOWS AND WELLS FINISHED CEILING CO +I FINISHED FLOOR o FINISHED CEILING FINISHED —.- CEILING 9 Eo FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED „..s. CEILING 17' a) FINISHED FLOOR (LOWER) FINSIHED CLG. (LOWER) F- +1 +1 CONCRETE SLAB (LOWER) West Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ii INFILL SIDING MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 5'011 b 41-6" Page 51 of 78 L_ 17 EJL Drawn By: SCALE: 1/4" = 1.-0" A2.0 Sheet No. ©2024 West Elevation NATURAL STONE CAP MATCH LANDSCAPING STONE 4. NEW WINDOW WELL MODULAR BLOCK L_ NEW FRONT DOOR NEW NUMBER LOCATION NEW LIGHTS (NO STORM) / I 1 L These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of INA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. Exterior Elevations Fl XISTING WINDOWS AND WELLS a LU LU cc I— z _11 a- (i) z a LU z Revisions H 4501 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: COA APPLICATION Date Issued: JULY 1, 2024 COA APPLICATION REPLACE VERTICAL SIDING WITH NEW SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING Page 52 of 78 E — 1 — , , 1 COA APPLICATION 11 Fl n 1 1 O 111•11111111•••••••=1 Revisions INFILL SIDING NEW WINDOWS NEW OPENING NEW SHUTTERS MATCH WEST FACADE WINDOWS (29.5 SQFT WINDOWS) it 0 NEW DOWNSPOUT LOC r:7 O O NEW DOWNSPOUT LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: COA APPLICATION Date Issued: JULY 1, 2024 NEW WINDOWS NEW OPENING NEW SHUTTERS MARVIN ULTIMATE DH1617 (22.5 SQFT OF WINDOWS) NEW WINDOW NEW OPENING MARVIN UFC4040E (FRENCH CASEMENT) EGRESS These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is trot for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design, LLC. Drawn By: EJL EXISTING GLASS BLOCK WINDOWS. WITH CONCRETE AND WELL CAPPED WITH BRICK PAVERS North Elevation - SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations A2.0 Sheet No. ©2024 Page 53 of 78 SLINNYS I DE ROAD (66' R/W) 92.15 (plat) S 65°5793099E 92.07 (meas) 15.6 RF 126.00 z-503 2-S-F N 59°46'45"W O 00 0) 0 0) ILJj 60 0 .g> 20 SCALE IN FEET = CONCRETE SURFACE = BITUMINOUS SURFACE = PAVER SURFACE 0 40" ELM O L r /Jo II 1.0 30" ASH ------""r-r-r- oNW- WPF 0.8'± CLEAR NLY ON LINE± ELY 18-28-24- • 903 11MIMpipow.„. ts; 90 I i0 0T tc‘ 1 2" YEW Q. 9018 90AP 0 ,,N. :;174?k 1r711 ,,,:tg') ,, 33.3 --- / 7.9 c't r, teBAY'S TO BE REMOVED tr; L-NEW EGRESS ROOF PEAK-924.5± FFE-905.9 1.8 6501 2-S- g°6 24" 4.711— • PP oc)( Ak° dR SN\ Ake" <19).,00) gq oo" - set 20270 under oose tone Randy L. Kurth, L.L.S. No. 20270 Russell J. Kurth, L.L.S. No. 16113 TOTAL LOT AREA = 9777± SQ.FT. ..edinc\country club districtt\4501 Drexel Cert.gxd 11x17 n 4-) ro co • LCA ti PLAT FOLDER 20" ? 0 90 007.8: O O 0 0 O 0, 0, • n ASH 'leo/ 2"-8"-8" ? 90 RI st0 - A 903 3 O 12" PINE 0 7" CED O WPF SHED u z z 0 IL =OR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY. PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY LICENSE LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE OF T f ST 4T 1F ESOTA. BENCHMARK TOP NUT HYD. ELEV. 902.39 ,18"MPL f0t, 4,00 Oci sv 00 "Yoe 8 • 21" MPL 0 BI CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (MEASUREMENTS SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS OF A FOOT) BEARINGS SHOWN ARE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83, 1986 ADJ. BENCHMARK USED: TNH A SE QUAD SUNNYSIDE ROAD A DREXEL AVENUE ELEV.=902.39 (CITY DATUM) KURTH SURVEYING, INC. 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 PHONE (763) 788-9769 E-MAIL: ksi@kurthsurveyinginc.com. DATE: JULY 3, 2024 0 = IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET • = IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND = SPIKE SET u = WOOD PRIVACY FENCE (wpF) = METAL PICKET FENCE (mpr) x912.0 = EXISTING ELEVATION 905 = EXISTING 1' CONTOUR —• = CENTERLINE DRAINAGE SWALE = STONE\WOOD RETAINING WALL = EXISTING TREE,SIZE,SPECIES APL=APPLE; CED— CEDAR; MPL=MAPLE; ?=UNKNOWN 0 PROPERTY DESCIRIPTION Lot 31, Block 5, COUNTY CLUB DISTRICT, FAIRWAY SECTION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4.1 4A 69 -TOP SILL -900.6 BASEMENT-.895.5 90-5 OHO 20" ? 0 ct, 5 0_ 36.5 !b go v Dip PALT. 90 - SLAB-905.3 REAR 21.5 CIP;::.•90 21.9 N)SLAB..905A FRNT GARAGE ,t %.9 .6 O r9 n ?„, 0 7" APL ‘.9 0 ONS DOJECT I'-20' 0 D R LC Page 54 of 78 UNEXCAVATED UNEXCAVATED REF. UNEXCAVATED SINK WH UP I I I I I 11111 1 1 1 1 1 1 UP UP 00 _J UP0-) REC. RM. XXX r. co cc Lt tr to W oo 0) cc 2 FURNACE (VERIFY w LOCATION) Lu MECH XXX OFFICE XXX W/D LAUNDRY XXX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STOOP ABOVE VERIFY IF STEPPED _J FOUNDATION Existing Lower Level Plan SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION Revisions These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design, LW. These documents were prepared for this project and is not far sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design, LLC. Drawn By: EJL Existing Floor Plan AB1.0 Sheet No. ©2024 Page 55 of 78 DEN XXX DN -7 75" DN DN XXX S=29"/80" DN DN -7/5" S=35.5"/80" PR if —il p q .11— 7— _I 4,-4L it 4 IL —I 4 1-4--I L I II I I II I TRELLISED WALI I II I I II I I II I n --- DINING xxx xxx KITCHEN, cc •:t• S=21"/80" NOOK xxx SINK 30"W 36"W W. OVEN RANGE LUJ VERIFY DOOR LOCATION VERIFY DOOR LOCATION GARAGE XXX FAMILY RM. 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com Revisions MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 co co Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION co. co 00 S=42"/93.5" (ARCHED TRANSOM) LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 Existing Main Level Plan These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LIC. SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS Drawn By: EJL Existing Floor Plan AB1.1. Sheet No. ©2024 Page 56 of 78 These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. Existing Floor Plan NEW WALLS AB1.2 Existing Upper Level Plan SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALLS LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION BEDRM. XXX / T N CO ri HALL XXX S=34"/79" II 1 L 7 7 1 _J STUDIO XXX XXX C4DN -11" co O co 1 _J L_ L_ 1 BATH XXX — 1 1 ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW OWNEO'S BR. XXX ATTIC S=30"/80" S=34"/79" LOW KW 1 ROOF BELOW S=34"/79" 4i L ROOF TERRACE C 0-'-' T53 moz C UJ CC ..,- BEDRM. XXX DN S=36"/77" (ARCHED) RE LI ELOW Revisions Drawn By: EJL Sheet No. ©2024 Page 57 of 78 t— PLYWOOD CEILING STRUCTURE +11 GARAGE SLAB Drawn By: EJL (0. Existing West Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FINISHED CEILING -.--:- 9 ----. ZN +;-Il ci I. FINISHED a)+1 FLOOR (LOWER) FINSIHED CLG. (LOWER) CONCRETE SLAB (LOWER) • 0 +1 FINISHED CEILING 00 O FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED CEILING N 9 00 FINISHED _ FLOOR FINISHED CEILING FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) FINSIHED CLG (UPPER) CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) 0 Existing North Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ani o. +I TOP OF SUBFLOOR BTM. EXPOSED LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION Revisions These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design, LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. Existing Exterior Elevations AB2.0 Sheet No. ©2024 FINISHED I" CEILING Zo + I FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED CEILING FINISHED FLOOR (UPPER) FiNSIHFD CLG. (UPPER) CONCRETE SLAB (UPPER) Page 58 of 78 L ISH OGR_ EXISTING REFI DOOR__ Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 0 UP UP UP 00 STAIR UP 0 NEW SHELVES- PAINTED PR 005 REMOVE PUTTING GREEN S=49.5"/88" 007 MECH 006 REC. RM. \F\URNACr RI LOGON) UNEXCAVATED slab on grade NEW WALLS NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION Revisions These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design, LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from INA Design. LLC. Drawn By: EJL Lower Level Floor Plan A10 Sheet No. ©2024 STG. 004 0 Lower Level Plan (Partial) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALLS STOOP ABOVE EXISTING REMAINS EXISTING REMAINS 1—.4 AT GRADE STONE CAP AT GRADE GE DNRY LE MAS 5.-0X3'4 +/- BOTT. DIM T 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 ;1-C\I uj 0 Z 13- HANGING SHELVES C‘' CD < >( 0. ()— X UJ Z OFFICE 000 Cc CC EL" Z 0 NEW DOOR 2'8 CABINETRY - FUTURE w (.1) YZ Up NEW EGRESS WINDOW WIDEN OPENING LOWER SILL FRENCH CASEMENT 9'-9 1/2"+/- 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 BUILD OUT AND INSULATE WALLS PER CODE (SUMP?) (INSULATE AND BUILD OUT WALLS OF LAUNDRY?) LNA Design TRINITY SINK 22X22 OR 42X22 UTILITY 003 LAUNDRY 001 Page 59 of 78 DW 30" REF. 30" PANTRY LOWER REF DRAWERS 0 DISPOSAL UC LED LIGHT1 LU C7 S rt • • (0 CO Lid REMOVE WIDE PLANK FLOORING REPLACE WITH NEW FLOORING TO MATCH DINING ROOM FEATHER IN NEW AND 0 DROP/ZONE 2024.05 Project Number: Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 WOOD O I- 0 1.1.1 CC 0 Z 3 LU Z Z Z — La co (i) °co o x <0 z 1.J.J Lu a. Z H-1 fN 0 0) 109 WOOD ai LIVING 107 WOOD T FULL HT. CABS 0 DN 7.75" FAMILY ROOM EXISTING FP SURROUND TO REMAIN REPAINT These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design, LIT. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC, Drawn By: EJL Main Level Floor Plan S=27.5780" NEW WINDOW NEW OPENING MATCH SIZE AND CONFIGURATION OF WEST WINDOWS MARVIN ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG 2822+/- SITE VERIFY SIZE TO MATCH CLE A A N N D TILE REFRESH GROUT ENTRY 106 REMOVE SIDE STANDARDS ADD FIXED SHELVES 13— S=35.5780" PR 103 UPDATE FINISHES — = U- J I— = 2 U- LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION Revisions VERIFY SYMME NEW DOOR NEW LOCATION RAISE THRESHOLD FIRE-RATED DOOR. INSIDE TO MATCH EXISTING INTERIOR DOORS (VERIFY IF DOOR CAN SWING OUT) SHLVS. RET SER W LK IT -1 17'-8 1/2" NEW WINDOWS NEW OPENING Main Level Plan (Partial) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS REMOVE SIDE STANDARDS ADD FIXED SHELVES REMOVE SIDE STANDARDS ADD FIXED SHELVES REMOVE SIDE STANDARDS ADD FIXED SHELVES KITCHEN 102 DINING 101 WOOD VERIFY CHUTE UP HALL 105 D —J J 2 MUD -7.75" 104 WOOD 14'-1" NEW WINDOWS NEW OPENING DN -J 13- 121-0" 22'-11" VERIFY DOOR LOCATION All Sheet No. ©2024 MICRO Page 60 of 78 BED HALL 203 DN Cg ROOF BELOW UPPER HALL 210 BEDRM. ROOF TERRACE >-‹ XISII'NG CHUTE rl 4_ NEW CABINETRY 202 DN TR LLIS BE OW S=34"/79" ROOF BELOW SHELVES WITH WALL BELOW H C- LNA Design 1500 Jackson Street NE Suite 422 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612 568 8486 info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com -ll oz cs 02 ca. u.1 X CO e.si W 0 Z z UC LED LIGHTS S=33.5"/78" co -9 to Upper Level Plan (Partial) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS Al2 Sheet No. ©2024 co O co II LAU. HALL 1/. / 7 213 0 DOUBLE MIRROR WITH WALL SCONCES MED CAB OPTION PRI. BATH 9 204 LINEN BENCH FULL TILE STONE THA DSHS 3'-8 1/2"+/- s-- -1 PRI.CLS 206 SHELVES MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET BEDRM. 201 7'-111/2" 2'-11/2" LEDGE z c73 U PRI. HALL 205 1 -T- CN1 G DRESSER 7 A Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION DN Revisions ARCH SIM. TO EXISTIN 2'-8" KING MAnopeNFN N L _ ( w w z CLS 209 BATH 211 / REPLACE LIGHTS PAINT MINOR FINISH UPDATES NEW SINK AND FAUCET STACKED WASHER DRYER electrolux) 2'OXVARIES/ SLOPED? SHORTS ? PRI. BED 207 BONSU ROOM 214 BED/FURN. WA P LAUND. 212 BASKET BENCH OR COUNTER 20X20X14H 20X20X14H BASKET BASKET 6' KW P :111: ROOF BELOW S=34"/79" 5=34"/79" 2'-8" _J cob c9 P These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design. LIC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design. LLC. Drawn By: EJL Upper Level Floor Plan Page 61 of 78 EXISTING SCALE: 1/4" = 12-0" EXISTING WALLS r-1 NEW WALLS DINING 101 WOOD SCALE: 1/4" = 12-0" EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS BAYS REMOVED I 1- 7 UC LED LIGHTS i DW Fo 30" PANTRY LOWER REF DRAWERS 30" REF. S=35.5780' PR T 103 KITCHEN UPDATE FINISHES 102 Tr) d -L I __I I --I I— \ I D = • LI- > , • 1 I I -J I LI- Lu O a. O VERIFY CHUTE MUD 104 Lu I—Cr WOOD I' in \ 2. NEW WINDOWS - WIDER OPENING VERIFY SYMMET lr PROPOSED S=29"/80" 1- DINING xxx I I I II DN S=21"/80" NOOK XXX 30"W W. OVEN XXX 36"W RANGE 5=35.5780" I I I><1 UPc 1 0 SINK NEW WINDOWS LNA 1500 Suite 612 568 Minneapolis, info@LNAdesign.com LNAdesign.com Jackson 422 LNA Design 8486 MN Street NE 55413 MURATORE RESIDENCE 4501 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Project Number: 2024.05 Project Phase: REVIEW SET Date Issued: JULY 6, 2024 NOT FOR PERMIT OR CONSTRUCTION Revisions These documents are instruments of service and as such remain the property of LNA Design, LLC. These documents were prepared for this project and is not for sale or use on any other project. Use or publication requires written approval from LNA Design, LLC. Drawn By: EJL Plan Comparison All Sheet No. ©2024 Page 62 of 78 August 12, 2024 Heritage Preservation Commission Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner COA H-24-3, 4501 Drexel Avenue- Changes to Street Facing Facade Information / Background: The subject property, 4501 Drexel Avenue, is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Drexel Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The existing home on the lot is a two-story Colonial Revival home built in 1936. The certificate of appropriateness application is for changes to street facing facades, specifically window changes on the north side of the home adjacent to Sunnyside Road. On the north side of the house the applicant is proposing to remove the two existing bay windows and one arched window on the first floor and replace the windows with double hung windows and infill siding. The applicant will also be adding an egress window on the north side of the home. The proposed changes to the west elevation include replacing the vertical siding with new siding to match the existing horizontal siding, a new front door, and the removal of a center bracket over the existing front door. The changes to the west elevation alone would not require COA review. Consultant Memo: See attached memo from Elizabeth Gales and Rachel Peterson, Hess, Roise and Company. Recommendation & Findings: Staff recommends approval and denial of portions of the proposed work. Approval: The staff recommendation is to approve the changes to the west façade of the home at 4501 Drexel Avenue. Those changes include: •Replacing vertical siding with horizontal siding to match existing •Remove center bracket above the existing front door Page 63 of 78 STAFF REPORT Page 2 •Install a new front door with multi-light glass panels The changes on the north side of the home that staff and Hess Roise recommend approval include: •The additional egress window •The removal of the non-historic bay window, fill in the opening and side with siding material to match existing home. The recommendation for approval is based on the following: •The proposed work complies with the Country Club Plan of Treatment. Conditions of approval: •Any change to the approved elevations or materials will need to be submitted for review. Denial: Staff recommends denial of the following proposed changes on the north elevation: •The removal of the historic bay window and install a wider pair of double hung windows with shutters o The historic bay window should be retained and repaired if needed. •The removal of the non-historic window and install a wider set of three double hung windows with shutters. o The window can be replaced with a new window, but the opening should remain the same size. Staff recommends denial of the above changes because the changes do not meet the plan of treatment and standards of rehabilitation. The bay window is a character defining feature of this home. The larger windows proposed will change the character defining fenestration on the north side of the home. Page 64 of 78 Page 1 Figure 1. Only one bay window is present on the north facade and it has a slightly different appearance to the current bay window. 4501 Drexel Avenue, c. 1950 (source: City of Edina) MEMO Date: 08/06/2024 To: Emily Bodecker, City of Edina From: Elizabeth Gales, Hess, Roise and Company Re: Certificate of Appropriateness Review – 4501 Drexel Avenue Summary Hess Roise has reviewed the Certificate of Appropriateness application for 4501 Drexel Avenue in the Country Club Historic District. The property is a corner lot bound by Drexel Avenue to the west, Sunnyside Road to the north, and neighboring single-family residential properties to the east and south. The house is two stories with a full basement. It has three distinct wings, and each has a gable roof. The house is Colonial Revival in style with Chateauesque elements and is a contributing resource to the historic district. The city’s file on the property shows that modifications have occurred to the building over time, including additions on the east side of the house. Historically, there was only one bay window on the north facade and it was in the west bay (Figure 1). In the 1990s, the roof on that bay window was reconstructed and a new bay window was also installed in the central bay. In the east bay on the north facade, the historic window visible in Figure 1 was replaced with the current segmental-arch window sometime after the period of significance. It is notable that the width of the current window appears similar to the width of the historic window. Page 65 of 78 Page 2 The following are character-defining features on the house: • Two-story building with multiple wings and clapboard siding. • Gable roofs with shed-roof dormers. • Shallow eaves with little to no overhang on the gable ends. • Symmetrical fenestration with aligned windows on the first and second stories. • Multi-pane, double-hung sash windows with decorative shutters. Decorative crown/cornice molding over the windows. • Bay windows on the north facade (one is historic; one is not historic). • Chateauesque surround at the front entrance. Proposed Work The property owner is making interior modifications to the house and is proposing modifications to the exterior that relate to the interior work. Other proposed work will update deteriorated architectural elements and materials. The COA includes the following information on the proposed work: West facade: • Replace vertical siding on the middle bay with clapboard siding that matches the siding on the rest of the house. • Remove a corbelled bracket from the middle of the cornice on the entrance surround. • Install a new house number in the middle of the door surround. • Install a new solid wood door with multi-light glass panels that reference the historic windows on the house. North facade – Main Wing: • On the first story, remove the historic and non-historic bay windows in the central and west bays. o In the west bay, install a wider pair of 6/6, double-hung sash windows flanked by shutters. o In the central bay, the window opening will be filled in and clad in clapboard siding on the exterior. • Remove the non-historic window in the east bay and install a wider set of three 4/4, double-hung sash windows flanked by shutters. • The shutters and the millwork on the replacement windows is proposed to match the historic millwork and shutters on the first-story windows on the west facade. • On the basement level in the westernmost bay, the window opening will be enlarged and a new French casement window installed. The concrete area well around the basement window will be replaced with a new larger area well. Plan of Treatment The Country Club Historic District has a Plan of Treatment with ten standards that apply to existing properties that contribute to historic significance of the district. The following standards are the most relevant for the proposed work. Page 66 of 78 Page 3 Standard B: The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Standard E: Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Standard F: Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Standard I: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed work on the west facade will comply with the standards. On the north facade, the enlargement of the basement window and area well will comply with the standards. The remainder of the work proposed on the north facade—removal of a historic bay window, a complimentary non-historic bay window, and a complimentary non-historic smaller window—do not meet the standards. Although the historic bay window was modified slightly in the 1990s, it has always been in the west bay of the north facade and is a character-defining feature. The non- historic windows in the central and east bay are complimentary to the historic character of the house. However, the interior modifications proposed by the owner require a solid wall with no window installed in the central bay. The larger windows proposed for the east and west bays will change the character-defining fenestration pattern on the north facade and will have a negative impact on the historic character of the property. Recommendations Hess Roise recommends that the HPC approve the following proposed work for 4501 Drexel Avenue. West facade • Replace vertical siding on the middle bay with clapboard siding that matches the siding on the rest of the house. • Remove a corbelled bracket from the middle of the cornice on the entrance surround. Install a new house number in the middle of the door surround. • Install a new solid wood door with multi-light glass panels that reference the historic windows on the house. Page 67 of 78 Page 4 North facade – Main Wing • On the basement level in the westernmost bay, enlarge the window opening and install a new French casement window installed. Enlarge the concrete area well around the basement window. Maintain the planting bed along the north facade to partially screen the enlarged window from view from the public right-of-way. • On the first story in the central bay, remove the non-historic bay window, fill in the opening, and clad the exterior wall in clapboard siding. Hess Roise recommends that the HPC deny the following proposed work. North facade – Main Wing • On the first story, remove the historic bay window in the west bay and install a wider pair of 6/6, double-hung sash windows flanked by shutters. o The historic bay window should be retained and repaired, if needed. • Remove the non-historic window in the east bay and install a wider set of three 4/4, double-hung sash windows flanked by shutters. o The window could be replaced with a new unit, but the opening must not be enlarged. Page 68 of 78 Pivotal Complementary Intrusion thin District: Roll#: Frame#: cklln Spaeth, Heritage Preservation Associates, Inc. Date: Summer, 1980 Page 69 of 78 Edina Country Club District: Historic and Architectural Survey Form Summer, 1980 Address : PIN#: Parcel#: Occupant: Condition: Lot: 3 Block: Owner: C Use: Date of Construction: ‘13 ti2 Architect/Builder: CS) Original Owner: \—e-,3 Subsequent Owners: • — T.- 0 N Original Use: Historical Information (if available): e Cc, ...ye cry- e c- r Ns- .k•e C...LC+St .p • / ..._!. v.t.›..c- R • Cr :a-yr ,---C ...,_. .cis- , - ....c::, /(D CA-a- t `VS fo ck.s. Style: Definitive Style Features: e e C- tZ) C:, f...y.(140,3b..N'es.:00c t Number of Stories: ;4 Roof Shape & Roofing Materials: Additions/Alterations: - Size & Spacing of Windows : Setback from Sidewalk: .rax . 20 Building Materials & Building Scale: Size & Spacing of Doors: Colors: _ - Garage/Outbuildings: Distinctive Landscape Features: r_c_n„,_e_., . Comments: — *z) ‘S.°C) CIV Page 70 of 78 AN LOT RECORD URB 0 Co LAND VALUE COMPUTATIONS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY LI- Rn .10 BUILDING PERMIT RECORD Date .1,15-q3 -7.2 -1? Number /- 1-347 23 Amount Purpose 1. TOPOGRAPHY Level High Low DRAINAGE Good-Fair-Poor IMPROVEMENTS Sidewalks Curb Cr Gutter City Water Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Nat'l Gas STREETS Asphalt Concrete Brick Gravel Dirt with alley Parcels covered by same homestead. List parcel numbers. LOCATION Corner Lot Inside Lot Residential Dbl. Bung. Multi-Family ZONING OR USE Commercial Industrial General Desirability: Good Poor Fair Other: SIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD BEET ADDRESS 4501 Drexel Avenue 31 BLOCK 5 . 3 COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT FAIRWAY SECTION ASSESSMENT DIST. SCHOOL DIST. NO. LOT ADD. Valuation changes to be entered on next line. Indicate year and authority — Assessor, Final Equalized, Abatement, etc. YEAR MARKET VALUE OF LAND MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES TOTAL MARKET VALUE FULL VALUE OF LAND FULL VALUE OF STRUCTURES TOTAL VALUE OF LAND AND STRUCTURES HOME- STEAD Yes No ASSESSED VALUES HOMESTEAD 25% REMAINDER Ca) 40% TOTAL 1792 6.76v zsacm _31tCev 19 93 G9w 26.3300 332315 1994 0000 2130(>0 7.9,000 T 0.0p• NI: / 2) .,, "...Ev.or 1 ot..,, Ici93 6904 3002on ,,36g261 364.360 IM 69.0:10 303o09 372.80) 37/960 /W/ &q000 36&600 171.R500c IN P L--1 -..-.-65 n / 1.4,7 C.*!:•<) 1993 glom 37724a 446241_ J(rgc( IS20J) a5-1.3w 41A63(n 1 Frontage Figured Average Depth Unit Price Unit Percent Front. Ft. Price Top. Intl. Total ALES ATION Date Consideration Kind of Inst. Remarks C #:v '41/pe -3-7f ..c-0,-) , Contract for Deed held by: Page 71 of 78 Date Amount Number itzen 1 47 2342 756100 URBAN LOT RECORD General Desirability: Other: Good Fair Poor j_Gt 4r o SIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD/ REET ADDRESS 4501 Drexel Avenue ASSESSMENT DIST. SCHOOL DIST. NO. '. LOT 31 BLOCK 5 • 3 ADD. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT FAIRWAY SECTION BUILDING PERMIT RECORD Purpose Q.cply) ri,/,4(/y, Cow l Gar° 14-76. /frri em - oy,to I I TOPOGRAPHY Level High Low DRAINAGE Good-Fair-Poor LOCATION Corner Lot Inside Lot IMPROVEMENTS Sidewalks Curb & Gutter City Water Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Nat'l Gas Residential Dbl. Bung. Multi-Family STREETS Asphalt Concrete Brick Gravel Dirt with alley Commercial Industrial Parcels covered by same homestead. List parcel numbers. ZONING OR USE LAND VALUE COMPUTATIONS Frontage Figured Average Depth Unit Price Unit Percent Front. Ft. Price Top. Intl. Total SALES INFORMATION Date Consideration Kind of Inst. Remarks l•U 7-1-:/</Ah', r .‘4 11 772 .S- 0 0 Contract for Deed held by: ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ion changes to be entered on next line. Indicate year and authority — Assessor, Final Equalized, Abatement, etc. YEAR MARKET VALUE OF LAND MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES TOTAL MARKET VALUE FULL VALUE OF LAND FULL VALUE OF STRUCTURES TOTAL VALUE OF LAND AND STRUCTURES HOME- STEAD Yes No ASSESSED VALUES HOMESTEAD 25% REMAINDER (a) 40% TOTAL 1992 690061 25acon ,3115-x )993 G9a,o 263.300 ,332.311 414 Woo 2.9304,0 74,9,000 w' 00,t/111: Y' / 2) I I oc, leigs— 6900 300266 ,36.72,61 36d30c1 1996 E9ten 303660 372,8m 371960 1qq obOO 356,660 LAR500q IMP=-If Saae5n. / 14,2 '-4 ' e' -- I9=18 69am 377249 4462oo !qq? 1s2Or 351361 -48630 1 Page 72 of 78 .3075 • RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD ADDRESS "44. — - PLAT NO. 754!!!5"...3e_, PARCEL NO. OTHER STRUCTURES DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SINGLE DWLG. Yr. Built /V.'. Grade No. of Stories Const. Cost MULTI. DWLG. Observed Physical Condition: Good 3 Normal Fair Poor Mo. Rental Grade_ Yr. Built Floor Overhead Door GARAGE Found. Finish Att. pet. — - Exterior Auto Control_ Bsmt. Roof ROOMS WIRING •---'BX CABLE PLUMBING City Water ROOF / Flat FOUNDATION Concrete Living Room BREEZEWAY Describe: Dining ,Rigid Conduit Well & Pump Gable Conc. Blk. Brick V. BUILT-INS Breakfast Nook •••••"' Kitchen Sewer Hip Bedrooms • Septic Tank Irregular Cesspool Den on—Study Shingle, Asphalt 3 Bookcases EXTERIOR WALLS Siding and Sheeting Wood-Makes' y Composition Shakes/ Redwood Stucco Brick Veneer Corn. or Rug. Roman or Face Stone YARD IMPROVEMENTS Describe: Driveways, Fences, Ret. Walls, Barbecue Pits, Patios, Swimming Pools, Etc. Baths (3 Fixt.) Half Bath (2 Fixt.) Rec. Room 7" Shingle, Wood „China Closet V- Extra Kit. Cabts. Utility Slate Single Fixtures Tile Refrigerator Roll, Composition Hot W.7.---Elec.—Ges-- 1/- Range Er Oven Shakes Water Softner INTERIOR FINISH Dishwasher Tor and Gravel Hdwd. Floors Garbage Disp. Insulated HEATING Softwood Floors OUT BUILDINGS Sheds, Cabins, Boathouses, Shops, Greenhouses, Etc. •/Fireplaces Inside Concrete Floors TILLN)G (Sq. Ft.) / , Cer„. - Plas. v/ Bath 71, Hall BASEMENT Fireplaces Outside Linoleum Floors Describe: None Full Hot Air: Pipeless Carpeted Floors Partial ---96 Insulated Yes No Piped (Gravity) Hardwood Trim Kitchen Unfinished Forced Circul'tn Meent,4,/, Softwood Trim PORCHES BUILDING DIAGRAM AND OUTBUILDINGS Draw to scale and show dimensions Partitioned , Plastered Int. Glazed: Screen: Open: MISCELLANEOUS 1../H. Water or Vapor Radiant Concealed Oil— Coal—,44—._ Finished Walkout Drywall Int. Incinerator Laminated Swim. Pool By: Date of Appraisal Interior Inspected Ye No STRUCTURAL VALUE COMPUTATIONS AREA SQ. FT. DEP. Cr OBS. % OFF NET RATE/S.F MARKET VALUE STRUCTURES DIMENSIONS RATE/S.F. 25 ............................................ • . ..... . . • ................. Z7X377 48 X15 x S 2X22 5 X a SX.31 HOUSE i Flat Charges Basement Finished Attic Finished Extra Plumbing Fie Built-ins & Misc. Porchesi'4 Ropl. Cost 24.75 1215 3 4 f 34 )N,CL. 25.14 0 12 No Bt." 7" 16,5 1+ -l-.2( INS/.... 12.54 /AREA 3145 TOTAL FLAT CHARGES TOTAL 4 2OX2I GARAGE BREEZEWAY / f-,"??1:7-c. 1.4 ... 477/0 . 420 4.30 a 0 C)(") 2,00 I ax Z88 5 7 1 YARD IMPS. . . . .... 4 C) 0 .72 --E4K . I RLC. E R#>7. OUTBUILDINGS 2 .. 19 TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES $ Future Adjustments: C Avinadte 4444 ,„,„4 "Auk Page 73 of 78 ro 8.0' 24.0' 18-028-24-12-0120 0' 39.0' 2/B City of Edina PID: 18-028-24-12-0120 Property Type: R - Residential Residential Field Card Property Address: 4501 Drexel Ave Zoning: R-1 Printed: 06/13/2007 Lot / Block: 031 / 005 Dwelling Type: Single Family Assessment Year: 2007 Addition: Country Club District Fairway Section Owner(s): Ralph E Herda Version: 2 Model: 007-003-010 District: Neighborhood: 03 0114 Jan H Herda Sketch by .gpex IVrm 14.0' Page 74 of 78 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: August 12, 2024 Item Activity: Action Meeting: Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda Number: 6.3 Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Type: Department: Community Development Item Title: 2025 HPC Work Plan Action Requested: Approve 2025 HPC Work Plan Draft Information/Background: Approve the draft 2025 Heritage Preservation Commission work plan. The work plan will ultimately be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Supporting Documentation: 1. DRAFT 2025 HPC Work Plan Page 75 of 78 Page 1 of 3 Commission Name 2025 Proposed Work Plan Initiative Type: Ongoing/Annual Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): Chair Lonnquist-all commissioners Initiative Title: Certificate of Appropriateness Applications Initiative Description: Review COA Applications when submitted Deliverable: Review Applications and issue COAs Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☒ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Budget for consultant review comes from Planning Budget. No additional budget is required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Consultant support is required with this work plan item. Consultants review plans prior to meeting with city planner and do a complete review and memo with all COA applications. Liaison Comments: This is an annual work plan item and is one of the main charges of the HPC. 1City Manager Comments: Initiative Type: Ongoing/Annual Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): Chair Lonnquist- all commissioners Initiative Title: Edina Heritage Landmarks Initiative Description: Based on owner interest, nominate eligible properties as Edina Heritage Landmarks and add additional properties to the eligible property list. Deliverable: Recommend designation of eligible heritage landmarks and add properties to Edina Landmark list. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): If staff receives request, study will be done by preservation consultant. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Preservation Consultant. Liaison Comments: This is another main charge of the HPC. 2City Manager Comments: = commission = staff Page 76 of 78 Page 2 of 3 Initiative Type: Ongoing/Annual Target Completion Date: Q3 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Heritage Preservation Award Initiative Description: Recruit nominees and award and promote the annual Heritage Preservation Award during Preservation Month in May. Deliverable: Seek and submit nominations, select recipient, and present the award. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☒ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Plaque cost comes out of Planning budget. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Staff works with Communications on getting the nomination form live and Communications writes an article about the annual winner. Liaison Comments: The HPC gives this award out every year during May which is Preservation Month. 2025 will be the 22nd year of the award. 3City Manager Comments: Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Century Home Program Outreach Initiative Description: Launch Century Home Yard Signs and meet with 3 community organizations to continue outreach and information on Century Homes Program. Deliverable: Presentation to three community organizations and launch century home yard signs Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☒ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Currently there are no funds for Century Home Yard signs in the Planning Budget. Yard signs cost between $10-17/sign. To date, there are 8 century homes recognized with roughly 200 eligible. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Communications support for the design and ordering of the yard signs. Liaison Comments: This is a modified/continued item from the 2024 HPC work plan.4City Manager Comments: Page 77 of 78 Page 3 of 3 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Public Outreach for Ordinance and Country Club Plan of Treatment Changes Initiative Description: Create information to illuminate changes to the city’s heritage preservation ordinance including addition of an escrow fee—and the Plan of Treatment for the Country Club Heritage Landmark District. Deliverable: Digital brochure, flowchart, decision tree Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☒ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No additional funds are requested. All outreach would be completed digitally/on the city’s website. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Additional staff support would include communications help on website updates and graphic design. Liaison Comments: Staff supports this initiative. Creating a digital brochure, flowchart and decision tree for the website will help educate community members and the HPC.5City Manager Comments: Parking Lot Page 78 of 78