Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-10-23 ETC Packet
Meeting location: Edina City Hall Community Room 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda Thursday, October 23, 2025 6:00 PM Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Prospect Knolls A/C/D Roadway Reconstruction Project 6.2. Parklawn Court Roadway Reconstruction Project 6.3. South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project 6.4. Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 6.5. SEMAP Update 6.6. Initiative #5: City Code Sec. 26-282 Page 1 of 275 6.7. 2025 Work Plan Updates 6.8. 2026/2027 Work Plan Update 7. Staff Comments 7.1. Transportation Projects Update 8. Chair and Member Comments 9. Adjournment Page 2 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 4.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Minutes Department: Engineering Item Title: Minutes Action Requested: Approve the minutes of the Transportation Commission's September 18, 2025 regular meeting. Information/Background: See attached draft minutes. Supporting Documentation: 1. Draft Minutes: Sept 18, 2025 Page 3 of 275 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room September 18, 2025 1. Call to Order Chair Lewis called the meeting to order at 6:11 p.m. 2. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Bildsten, Brown, Rosen, Bracken, Lassig, Lewis Absent: Commissioners Olson, Trueger, White Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni 2.1 Welcome Commissioner Bracken The Commission welcomed new Student Commissioners Bracken. 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Rosen and seconded by Commissioner Wright to approve the August 21, 2025 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. 5. Community Comment None. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. City Code Review The Commissioner reviewed and commented on proposed changes to City Code relating to the Transportation Commission. 6.2. 2025 Work Plan Updates 1. Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan Participation – PMT met this week, safety analysis and prioritization framework are in progress. 2. Commission-Led Events – Committee will participate in Concord Elementary’s bike/walk to school day on October 8. City will provide bike lights and bells to distribute. 3. Review of City Policies/Ordinances – No update. 4. City Code Update – Commission reviewed draft updates. Page 4 of 275 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 5. City Code Regarding Bicycles – Committee is drafting a report and recommendations to City Council; will review with Commission next month. 6.3. 2026/2027 Work Plan Proposal The Commissioner continued to discuss their work plan proposal and ranked initiatives as follows: 1. Continued SEMAP Working Group Participation 2. Traffic Safety Standards/Warrants Review and Playbook for Decision Making and Resident Communication 3. Innovative Traffic Calming Solutions and “Towards Zero Deaths” Pilot Program (with Seasonal Adaptations) 4. Transportation Segment of Comprehensive Plan Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to approve the 2026/2027 work plan proposal. All voted aye. Motion carried. 7. Staff Comments – Received. 7.1. Transportation Projects Update Staff provided an update on current and upcoming transportation projects in and around Edina. 7.2. 2025 Meeting Dates The Commission’s next regular meeting is Thursday, October 23. 7.3. Proposed 2026 Meeting Dates Staff provided the proposed regular meeting dates for 2026. 8. Chair and Member Comments – Received. 9. Adjournment Motion was made by Commissioner Rosen and seconded by Commissioner Brown to adjourn the September 18, 2025 regular meeting at 7:50 p.m. All voted aye. Motion carried. Page 5 of 275 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 SEAT NAME 1 Wright, Grant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 100% 2 VACANT 3 Bildsten, Roger 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 100% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 89% 5 Rosen, Adam 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 89% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 78% 7 Olson, Bethany 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 78% 8 White, Joan 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% 9 Trueger, Noah 1 1 2 22% 10 Lassig, Augie (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 78% 11 Bracken, Logan (s) 1 1 100% Page 6 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Roadway Reconstruction Project Action Requested: Review and comment on the proposed 2026 roadway reconstruction project. Information/Background: Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler, Senior Project Engineer Ben Jore and Graduate Engineer Chris Moore will present the Prospect Knolls A/C/D roadway reconstruction project. See attached draft engineering study. Supporting Documentation: 1. Draft Engineering Study 2. Appendices Page 7 of 275 ENGINEERING STUDY PROSPECT KNOLLS A, C, & D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Kerry Road, Lanham Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Village Drive, Weston Circle, Wexford Road IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 October 17, 2025 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. _______________ Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Page 8 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local bituminous streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, installation of new concrete curb and gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalks, lining of sanitary sewer, localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. Watermain improvements adjacent to the Dublin Reservoir (located along Dublin Road) are also included in this project that will increase the efficiency of the reservoir. The estimated total project cost is $X_________. 47.40% of the roadway costs will be funded through property taxes and 52.60% will be funded through special assessments at the following rates per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $X_________ and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are estimated to cost $X_________ and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure” and the “Strong Foundations” City budget goal. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian facilities. LOCATION: The project includes West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Kerry Road, Lanham Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Village Drive, Weston Circle, and Wexford Road. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Assessment District Preliminary Assessment per REU 1 $X_________ 2 $X_________ 3 $X_________ Page 9 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 3 Figure 1: Project Area Map Page 10 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The roadways in the Prospect Knolls A, C, and D neighborhood were originally constructed between 1958 and 1990 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood, 1969 Approximately 2/3 of roadways in the project area have existing curb and gutter, primarily the streets east of and including Antrim Court, Antrim Terrace and Shannon Drive. The average roadway width is 28 feet (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb or edge of pavement). The roadways located south and west of Village Drive are privately owned and maintained. A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area shows the roadway section varies from 1.75 inches to 8 inches of bituminous pavement and 3.0 inches to 23.75 inches of aggregate base, over a poorly graded sand and silty sand base. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is Page 11 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 5 78 and the average PCI for Prospect Knolls A/C/D is 25. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition The existing geometry of the intersections at Kerry Road/Wexford Road and Wexford Road/Down Road creates a large radius and wide pavement on the southeast side of Wexford Road between the Down Road and Kerry Road intersections. This allows southbound vehicles on Kerry Road that turn onto Wexford Avenue and then take an immediate left onto Down Road to comfortably maneuver through the two intersections at speeds higher than typical or desirable for conventional intersections. The existing geometry of this intersection is shown in Figure 2. Page 12 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 6 Figure 2: Kerry Rd/Wexford Rd and Wexford Rd/Down Rd Intersections (Existing Conditions) The intersection of Down Road and Lee Valley Road is currently not centered in the right-of-way and City employees have stated the intersection is hard to maneuver with snow plows. The existing geometry of this intersection is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Down Rd / Lee Valley Rd Intersection (Existing Conditions) Page 13 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 7 Driveways There are many unique driveways throughout the project area which include brick pavers and colored concrete. Photo 3 shows an example of a driveway with brick pavers in the project area. Photo 3: Brick Paver Driveway Cul-de-Sacs There are nine cul-de-sacs within the project area. Six (Antrim Court, Antrim Terrace, Dublin Circle, Shannon Drive, Tara Road and Weston Circle), have existing curb and gutter. Two (Antrim Court and Shannon Drive), have center islands that contain trees, boulders and landscaping. Four cul-de-sacs’ diameters are smaller than the City’s standard diameter of 70’ and four are larger than the standard diameter. Traffic and Crash Data Staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at several locations within or near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes within the neighborhood range between 291 and 754 vehicles per day with 85th percentile speeds between 25.2 and 29 miles per hour. Traffic and crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Landscaping Numerous property owners have landscaping within the right of way. Many of these landscape items are located directly behind the curb. Some of these landscape Page 14 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 8 items will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary reconstruction work. Photo 4 shows a typical landscaping feature found in the project’s right of way. Photo 4: Landscaping within ROW Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no pedestrian facilities within the project area. There are existing sidewalks immediately adjacent to the project area on Dewey Hill Road, West 70th Street, Antrim Road and Cahill Road. (see Appendix B). Additionally, a trail exists around Lewis Park adjacent to the project area, including a trail entrance spur at the intersection of Kemrich Drive and Tara Road. Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area; however, there are existing bike lanes immediately adjacent to the project area on Antrim Road, West 70th Street and Cahill Road (see Appendix C). Transit Facilities There are no transit facilities within the project area. Metro Transit’s Local Routes 6 and 540 operate within ½ mile of the project area on Cahill Rd and Dewey Hill Rd. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer SECTION INCOMPLETE Watermain Page 15 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 9 SECTION INCOMPLETE Storm Sewer SECTION INCOMPLETE Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications, cable and fiber optic utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are a combination of overhead and underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. Street lighting within the project area consists of standard “cobra head” fixtures mounted on wooden poles and lantern-style fixtures mounted on fiberglass poles as shown in Appendix E. All lighting is owned by Xcel Energy. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendix B, a sidewalk is proposed along Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive, Kemrich Drive between Shannon Drive and Fleetwood Drive, Fleetwood Drive, and Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street. Appendix C shows no proposed bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation and local drainage problems. Page 16 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 10 Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality, and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place pipe liners. This project will also reduce inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. Water Resource Management Plan (December 2022 Amendment) SECTION INCOMPLETE Climate Action Plan The CAP identified the following strategies that align with this roadway reconstruction project. Transportation and Land Use (TL) 1: Decrease community-wide vehicle miles traveled by 7% by 2030. Action TL 1-2: Accelerate building on-street and off-street protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas and fill connectivity gaps as identified in the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. TL 2: Double public transit commuter ridership from 3.3% to 6.6% by 2030. Staff Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. COMMENTS REQUESTED Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. COMMENTS REQUESTED Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 23, 2025, a draft engineering study was provided for review. [2025 COMMENTS] Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to numerous in person or virtual open houses between September 2017 and August 2025. Residents were Page 17 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 11 invited to an informational presentation and were able to directly ask questions to staff in August 2025. Residents were notified of a recorded video version of the August 2025 informational presentation posted on the Better Together Edina website, where residents were able to ask questions to staff from the Better Together Edina website, as well as telephone and email. Materials from the August 2025 informational presentation can be found in Appendix I. On June 25, 2025, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation and local drainage problems within the project area. The questionnaire was completed by 74 of 283 property owners, a return rate of 26%. The following is a summary of feedback received from residents: • 25 of 74 (34%*) were concerned or very concerned with the speed of traffic in the neighborhood; 49 (66%) were not concerned. • 8 of 74 (11%*) were concerned or very concerned with the volume of traffic or number of vehicles in the neighborhood; 65 (89%) were not concerned. • 23 of 74 (31%*) concerned or very concerned with motorist behavior in the neighborhood; 51 (69%) were not concerned. • 34 of 74 (47%) identified an unsafe intersection within the neighborhood. • 45 of 74 (76%) walk, run, or jog in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 22 of 74 (31%) ride a bicycle in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 5 of 74 (7%) reported parking on the street at least 2-3 times per week; 56 (77%) reported parking on the street less than once per month. • 10 of 74 (14%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood. *Percentages based on number of returned surveys The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix J. Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix K. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. The proposed improvements also align with the Budget Work Plan values and goals developed by the City Council and staff. Roadways Typical Section The bituminous roadways are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. The existing bituminous pavement and suitable aggregate material will be recycled for use as base material in the new roadway where feasible. A minimum of 8” of aggregate base material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous non-wear and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Page 18 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 12 Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. Significant subgrade removals may occur where areas of clay soils are present. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. All roadways within the project area are designated as Local Streets in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have concrete curb and gutter and a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalks or 24’ with a 5’ sidewalk on one side. Local streets that vary from the guidelines are as follows: • Kerry Road will be reconstructed to a 24-foot width to minimize impacts on mature trees and existing retaining walls, and to account for the steep slopes present in the boulevards. • Village Drive will be reconstructed to 30 feet to accommodate additional parking and to match the privately owned and maintained street widths south and west of Village Drive. Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. One-sided parking is proposed on Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Fleetwood Drive, and Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street due to the proposed pedestrian facilities (see pedestrian facilities below). One-sided parking is also proposed on Kerry Drive due to the proposed 24’ street width. Given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that parking changes should not occur on any other streets in the project area. The existing and proposed street widths and parking recommendations are shown in Figure 7 through 10, Table 1 and Appendix L. Page 19 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 13 Figure 7: Streets with sidewalk: Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive, Kemrich Drive, Fleetwood Drive, and Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street Figure 8: Streets without sidewalk: West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Lanham Lane between Kemrich Drive and Fleetwood Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive north of Kemrich Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Weston Circle, Wexford Road Page 20 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 14 Figure 9: Kerry Road Figure 10: Village Drive Page 21 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 15 Street Name Existing Roadway Width¹ (face to face), feet Existing Curb Type Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Sidewalk, feet Boulevard Width, feet Proposed Parking W. 70th St 25-27 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Antrim Ct 27 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Antrim Rd 26-28 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Antrim Ter 27 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Down Rd 26-30 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Dublin Cir 29.5 B618 27 - - Two-sided Dublin Rd 25-28 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Fleetwood Dr 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Kemrich Dr 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Kerry Rd 24-26 N/A 24 - - One-sided Lanham Ln betw. Kemrich Dr and Fleetwood Dr. 27.5 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Lanham Ln betw. Fleetwood Dr. and W. 70th St. 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Lee Valley Cir 29.5 B618 27 - - Two-sided Lee Valley Rd 28-30 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Shannon Dr, between Dewey Hill Rd and Kemrich Dr 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Shannon Dr north of Kemrich Dr 27.5 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Tara Rd 27 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Tralee Dr 29-30 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Village Dr 29.5 B618 30 - - Two-sided Weston Cir 27.5 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Wexford Rd 24-28 N/A 27 - - Two-sided ¹Existing roadway width is measured from edge of bituminous to edge of bituminous on streets with no curb and gutter Table 1: Street Widths and Parking The intersections of Kerry Road/Wexford Road and Wexford Road/Down Road are proposed to closely match the existing geometry, with changes limited to about one Page 22 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 16 or two feet. A double yellow pavement marking stripe will be added to the intersections, discouraging drivers from crossing over the centerline. The proposed geometry of the Down Road and Lee Valley Road intersection is shown in Figure 11. The proposed roadway will move west from its existing location to be more centered within the right of way. However, the roadway may only move approximately 1–3 feet due to existing retaining walls and power pole guy wires on the west and southwest side of the roadway. The widths of Down Road and Lee Valley Road are proposed to be 27 feet from face of curb to face of curb. The width of the roadway through the curve is proposed to be 30 feet in order to help snow plow drivers maneuver the turn easier. The southern curb line through the curve is proposed to receive surmountable curb so snow plows can safely and easily push snow into the boulevard. Figure 11: Proposed Down Rd/Lee Valley Rd Intersection Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs will conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Driveways Driveways will be affected by construction and will be reconstructed. The unique driveways throughout the project area, including brick pavers, will be re-laid with the intent to replicate existing conditions to the extent practicable. Cul-de-Sacs Due to the location of existing retaining walls, utility poles, large trees, and available right-of-way, no significant change to the size and geometrics of the cul-de-sacs are proposed. Minor geometric changes are proposed to allow for better turning movements where feasible. Page 23 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 17 Landscaping Any landscaping disturbed by construction will be replaced with the intent to replicate existing conditions to the extent practicable. Multi-Modal Transportation Staff seeks to balance the recommendations of the City’s guiding documents (Living Streets Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan), feedback from affected residents, available right-of-way and potential tree and infrastructure impacts. Staff is proposing new sidewalks on the following streets as recommended in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan: • The east side of Shannon Dr from Dewey Hill Rd to Kemrich Dr • The north side of Kemrich Dr from Shannon Dr to Fleetwood Dr • The west side of Fleetwood Dr, and • The south / west side of Lanham Ln between Fleetwood Dr and W 70th St Staff is also proposing a new sidewalk on the north side of Kemrich Dr between Fleetwood Dr and Tara Rd. This sidewalk is not included in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, but will connect the other proposed sidewalks to the trail at Lewis Park. Figure 12 shows all existing and proposed pedestrian facilities (also detailed in Table 1 above). Page 24 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 18 Figure 12: Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities The benefits of these sidewalks include: • Connection to existing and proposed multi-modal facilities on Dewey Hill Rd and W 70th St • Improving access to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School • Improving access to Lewis Park • Improving access to adjacent transit facilities Page 25 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 19 Locations were selected by staff based on existing topography, connections to existing facilities and private utility conflicts, and maintenance. The grass boulevards that will separate the new curb and the proposed sidewalks is proposed to be 5’- wide but may vary depending on construction conflicts. Separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. The extra width needed for the sidewalks and boulevards will be balanced between both sides of the street, where feasible. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and portions of the existing sidewalks will be reconstructed as necessary. As the proposed sidewalk segments are not along Municipal State Aid routes, adjacent to City property nor included in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan, they will be maintained by the adjacent property owners. Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities in this project area. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer SECTION INCOMPLETE Watermain COMMENTS REQUESTED Storm Sewer COMMENTS REQUESTED Private Utilities Staff will meet with representatives of several private utility companies in December 2025, to discuss the proposed 2026 reconstruction project and preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. RIGHT-OF-WAY/ EASEMENTS: Existing right-of-way in this neighborhood varies from 40’ to 60’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW; temporary construction easements may be required for utility improvements within existing permanent easements. Page 26 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 20 Many properties have special mailboxes, retaining walls, vegetation, boulders or other landscaped items within the right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $_________, (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Assessment District 1 $ _______ Special Assessments Assessment District 2 $ _______ Special Assessments Assessment District 3 $ _______ Special Assessments Roadway $ _______ Property Taxes Roadway Total: $ _______ Sanitary Sewer $ _______ Watermain $ _______ Storm Sewer $ _______ Utility Total: $ _______ City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total: $ _______ PACS Fund Project Total: $ _______ Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 231.67 roadway residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Prospect Knolls A/C/D project area. The estimated assessment per REU is shown in Table 3, and the assessment districts are shown in Figure 13. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix M. Table 3: Summary of Total REUs and Assessments Assessment District REUs Preliminary Assessment per REU 1 58.67 $ _______ 2 153 $ _______ 3 20 $ _______ Page 27 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 21 Figure 13: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map Page 28 of 275 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 October 17, 2025 22 PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the past and future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Open House (all 2019/2020 projects) September 25, 2017 Neighborhood Open House (all 2020/2021 projects) September 24, 2018 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (all 2020 projects) August 12, 2019 Public Hearing (all 2020 projects) December 9, 2019 City Council Rejects Prospect Knolls A 2020 Project January 7, 2020 Neighborhood Informational Video Presentations (all 2024 and Future projects) Fall 2022 Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Open Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Close Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2025 Public Improvement Hearing Council Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 Table 7: Project Timeline RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2026 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Prospect Knolls A, C, and D neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Traffic and Crash Data B. Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Street Lights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H. Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication I. Neighborhood Informational Presentation Materials J. Resident Questionnaire K. Correspondence from Residents L. Proposed Typical Sections M. Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 29 of 275 APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Page 30 of 275 Prospect Knolls Traffic Counts DatePeak85% SpeedADTLocation September 201936 – 2:30 PMN/A332W 70th September 2019 August 2001 43 – 3:30 PMN/A 26.2 MPH 395 622 Antrim Rd September 201933 – 3:30 PMN/A307Lee Valley Rd September 201976 – 5:00 PM28.4 MPH754Shannon Dr May 202430 – 3:15 PM28.1 MPH291Fleetwood Dr July 2007 July 2007 57 – 5:00 50 – 6:00 28.2 MPH 25.2 MPH 577 539 Lanham Ln May 2011N/A29 MPH378KemrichDr Page 31 of 275 Traffic Safety Requests May 2018-Present 1 2 3 Under reviewStop sign visibilityMarch 20251 No actionStop signMarch 20222 No actionCut thru/speed complaintsApril 20233 Page 32 of 275 Reported Crashes 2015-Present DateInfoCrash Type# July 2020Driver fleeing policeSideswipe – No injuries1 August 2018Drunk driverRan off road2 January 2017Icy roadwayRan off road – property damage3 1 2 3 Page 33 of 275 APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Page 34 of 275 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree kNineMileCree kNine Mile Creek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use PathExisting Sidewalk Proposed Shared-Use PathProposed SidewalkProposed Twin Loops Page 35 of 275 APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map Page 36 of 275 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree k NineMileCreek Ni ne Mile Cre ek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use Path Proposed Shared-Use Path Proposed Twin Loops Advisory Bike Lane Existing Bike Boulevard Bikeable ShoulderExisting Shared Bike LaneExisting Bike LaneExisting Buffered Bike Lane Proposed Bike BoulevardProposed Bike LaneProposed Buffered Bike Lane Page 37 of 275 APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks Page 38 of 275 APPENDIX E Street Lights and Signs Page 39 of 275 Page 40 of 275 Page 41 of 275 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Page 42 of 275 Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy Page 43 of 275 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 44 of 275 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 45 of 275 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 46 of 275 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 47 of 275 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 48 of 275 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 49 of 275 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 50 of 275 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 51 of 275 APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Page 52 of 275 APPENDIX H Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication Page 53 of 275 APPENDIX I Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials Page 54 of 275 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting –August 26, 2025 Page 55 of 275 Agenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •Project Scopes •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Questions Page 56 of 275 Engineering - Design & Construction Division Brandon Freeman Sr. Engineering Technician Chris Moore Graduate Engineer Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer Chad Millner Director of Engineering Jon Moore Sr. Engineering Technician Tom Haataja Sr. Engineering Technician Ben Jore Sr. Project Engineer Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator Page 57 of 275 2026 Project Areas •Parklawn Court •4 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •283 Properties Page 58 of 275 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility issues Page 59 of 275 Why Reconstruct? •Roadway originally constructed with in the 1950’s-1980’s •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) Page 60 of 275 Existing Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Some streets have curb and gutter while others do not •Some properties already have concrete driveway aprons, some do not Page 61 of 275 Existing Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains •Sanitary Sewer - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. - Inflow and infiltration •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing Page 62 of 275 What / Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically, 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey Page 63 of 275 Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences Page 64 of 275 Proposed Improvements – Roadways •Replacement and installation of curb & gutter •Subgrade corrections as needed •New roadbed and asphalt pavement surface Page 65 of 275 Living Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •Minimum roadway design elements •Street Width •Impacts •Cost •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Page 66 of 275 Proposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced / installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy Page 67 of 275 Proposed Improvements - Utilities •Includes partial replacement of watermain •New service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •May include localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Lining of sanitary sewer •Storm sewer upgrades Page 68 of 275 Proposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Installed when feasible and warranted •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website Page 69 of 275 Utility Ownership City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service Page 70 of 275 Utility Ownership •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Page 71 of 275 Proposed Improvements – Ped / Bike •Based on Pedestrian and Bicyclist Master Plan •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts Page 72 of 275 Private Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Fiber optic internet currently being installed •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance Page 73 of 275 Overhead Utility Poles •Resident request about burying overhead utilities •Not required by the City, nor does the City fund this •If pursued, full cost by property owners •Significant cost •Private service connection not included Page 74 of 275 What You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Localized flooding during rainfall •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain Page 75 of 275 What You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in ROW •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Construction equipment stored on streets •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) Page 76 of 275 What You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 7 days to allow driveways to cure Page 77 of 275 What You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be restored with new sod Page 78 of 275 What You Can Expect •We will; •Provide opportunities for input •Keep you informed •Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs Page 79 of 275 City Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •Sanitary sewer •Watermain Page 80 of 275 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •Sidewalks /shared-use paths •Bike lanes •Associated signage and pavement markings •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees Page 81 of 275 Do Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~23% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •~3.2% go to Public Works •Snowplowing •Pothole repairs •Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •In 2022 taxes began paying for a portion of street reconstruction Figures per proposed 2025 Edina Tax Levy (not final) Page 82 of 275 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers portion of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Driveway installation •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings Page 83 of 275 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties REU FactorLand Use ClassScenario 1.0Single-Family ResidentialA 0.5Multi-Family Residential –Apartment/CondosB Page 84 of 275 Project Details – Parklawn Court •4 properties (41.50 REUs) •330’ of road •Full removal and replacement of curb & gutter •Concrete roadway removed and replaced with Bituminous •Water services replacement •Sanitary Lining and local replacement •Storm sewer improvements •Potential sidewalk(s) •Street width still to be determined Page 85 of 275 Project Details – Prospect Knolls A, C, & D •283 properties (231.67 REUs) •3.20 miles of road •Installation and replacement of curb & gutter •Partial watermain and full water services replacement •Sanitary lining and localized repairs •Storm sewer improvements •24’ street width 5’ walk: •Portions of Shannon Drive, Lanham Lane •Kemrich Drive, Fleetwood Drive •Typically 27’ street width remaining streets Page 86 of 275 Proposed Utility Improvements •Install 12” watermain from West 70th Street to Gleason Road •Existing Utility Easement •Replace 6” watermain on Dublin Circle •Replace 6” watermain on Lanham Lane •Upgrade 1.5” watermain in cul-de-sacs to 6” watermain •Install 8” sanitary sewer on 70th Street Page 87 of 275 Pedestrian Facilities Plan •5’ concrete sidewalk •Shannon Drive •Kemrich Drive •Fleetwood Drive •Lanham Lane •Connection to existing Lewis Park path •Sidewalk to be maintained by adjacent property owners Page 88 of 275 Proposed: 24’ road width, one-sided parking, 5’ sidewalk (0-5’ grass boulevard) Existing: 30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – Sidewalk Streets Page 89 of 275 Existing: 26’-30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed: 27’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – No Sidewalk Streets •27’ road width •Reduce street widths by 0-3’ •Two-sided parking to remain •Exceptions •Kerry Road •24’ width •One-sided parking •Village Drive •30’ width Page 90 of 275 Revised Roadway Cost Assessment - Local Sample Assessment During Transition $30,000$20,000$10,000% of Local Roadway Costs Assessed Construction Year $30,000$20,000$10,000100%2020 $23,670- $17,358 $15,780- $11,572 $7,890- $5,78678.90%-57.86%2021-2025 $15,780$10,520$5,26052.60%2026 $14,202-$1,578$9,468-$1,052$4,734-$52647.34%-5.26%2027-2035 $0$0$00%2036 Page 91 of 275 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 92 of 275 Assessments Districts – Prospect Knolls •Disparity in potential benefit •3 Separate Districts Page 93 of 275 Preliminary Assessments – Prospect Knolls & Parklawn Ct *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) SY of Paving per REU Square Yards of Paving # of REUs Estimated Assessment Range per REU* % of Roadway Costs Assessed NeighborhoodYear -------Prospect Knolls A/C/D2026 328.119,25058.67$21,500 -$16,200 52.60%District 1 2026 161.424,692153$10,900 -$8,200 52.60%District 22026 66.01,32120$3,800 -$2,900 52.60%District 32026 29.41,22141.5$2,400-$1,80057.86%Parklawn Court2026 120.935,250291.6$11,500 -$7,500 57.86%Presidents A/B2025 175.230,568174.49$17,100 -$11,900 63.12%Concord B/C 2024 Page 94 of 275 Typical Project Timeline MilestoneDate Engineering studies/estimates providedJuly –September 2025 Public hearingsDecember 2025 Plan preparation and biddingJanuary – March 2026 Construction beginsApril – May 2026 Construction concludesOctober – November 2026 Warranty work2027 Final assessment hearingFall 2027 Page 95 of 275 Assessment Timing MilestoneDate Initial Public HearingsDecember 2025 Project ConstructedSummer 2026 Final Assessment HearingOctober 2027 Assessment Filed with CountyNovember 2027 Assessment on Tax StatementJanuary 2028 Page 96 of 275 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2024 interest rate was 4.69% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 97 of 275 Communication •Regular Mail •All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires •Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers •Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, concrete, temporary inaccessibility) •Better Together Edina – City Website Project Page Page 98 of 275 Better Together Edina •Best way to stay informed •www.bettertogether edina.org •Free, access to periodic updates on project progress and schedules Page 99 of 275 Providing Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •Traffic/pedestrian issues •Street drainage issues •Streetlight upgrades •Public hearing in December 2025 •Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns Page 100 of 275 Questionnaire Results Responses Received to DateNeighborhood 26% (74 / 283)Prospect Knolls 25% (1 / 4)Parklawn Court Page 101 of 275 How To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Review Better Together Edina updates •Ask questions, stay informed Page 102 of 275 Contact Us Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 ADitzler@edinamn.gov Page 103 of 275 Questions? •Ask questions on Better Together Edina Q&A page •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/parklawn-court •Call or email Page 104 of 275 Thank you for your time! Page 105 of 275 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 1 K: i, cA-4-40) 101A-2.f eei-AA.... 70 2„6 I frz_RF_Jr 2 ,--(Er---F G /55 EL i3e-z--e--.. Zoo ? Z-4-A/ 44 ik,1 3 -)" OLP ; 11, Uje_Ary\----c 110QQt Down Psockct 4 -pk - -, (1 -P--,,5 <- F 1 (-_) .. ... r, (( 7,00 siiin h (,-, Dv- 5 70‘...4_,,,...,t.c.„s 5----,7 ''<i o!... Ts+, 6 -Lt.Sia V) -- ,(4n gs - C 3 ki\i - 7o TI- 7 e--) 4 V \, c&)1•)te -) jcV -- 1-1M1 S- .1 (A) 3T) 8 Th(1"4- 47-ky 467-0011 ‘ oo 5 6 06frA 6-e,1.e.) 9 X / Fi-e 44 4) fte-i" 6,5-0/ * 1/a 7 D 10 ) wt Sal bik4k5i,,14‘44/242_ 1-c32,c) Slukyn&AA-CDr. 11 Ga ry -. ate,/ Icy tc-Tc/ins5c,r- .SS D/ 11;//a6e, 4.)r, 12 A/ 4.7,-, ki g_e_4e-is 1,1 1$ 13 , 20-vQ.., LOMMe_____k II -Apn __,_-\--4Th-1--c;, 14 6( r.--\-- C-1-7 1 \-1--..ct 1°2 O u - )e,,s, Cltr do _ 15 gkk.b i_.%/0„1 LAI3is 7671h KL=-_-)e__, E0,6,- 16 0,(2-1A--) C-* )3T--c, r NAL-- ---/ (2..-:' c L-e-e-1-t,/- 6 %) D4--t 17 M -A-1-1 l_,S T.- 0 -7/c4 riee/A)ddd ipri:/z 18 <-3: k ..\ ( j.x. cf 6,- -110 .c 1-(s2eh,,,d..,t Pr,-e 19 -L. ,,,-, ' nfz_t_&-s-L. /-6,, ----7 k 09 r-, ffil-LaoD -Pal 0 e- 20 fiecipte (-L©P 721-2_ I—A p(A- 7z2V /i4All--1/7(-n:x4 (5-ei/i ijA4-70 ci, or 21 1)OiLl- UPt-d0 - ALPS ( -C:9 22 t1606 ter00 i'df 7 //kat Rrib`ve 23 AoolNeAl.,e_ i\ActiAao/ 55-26 YI'llat Dr i,i t_ 24 4t,d64;126G ° g/a4 57/7 // ':- , ii4.4fAR 25 PZ--k 04,..ess _ I Lo L 1 A g,J 26 44,a f -95 ao G,&,, 7100 Poies000l DY -7`2-61r F ( (d-i .3-.& Dr. 27 /' ,- , D,A 28 -If \ (A6v a-- -l-e1152-44. ' MA La h hcon tr) 29 b-A-4-‘`-- -2Y---4)--7--)-,-- 4 Zei--/ -k,,.. 7 o o 30 7e/ < e_ IA cy-,4_14 55- Li c w_ 7o t-4 5 .r Page 1 of 4 Page 106 of 275 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 31 i.e..' -1/1 t„,t,L5 .) 07 6-11 ir ' \v‘ (-1- 32 Pc,t,,1 d c•cru 0 %laid kekket L L 33 --Iv.S.W\ Syr re- LA 1 OCI'l La eti-vt," 34 re('',0f„rby --"x),( v .,..7^ 35 Veco n t ca, er 44(w.e.V _.-Si knol 701 St.., 36 k(-1--, .\ Sai \\ a--_SA '1113 (A r-rk_cz --\" 0 6-1 37 Cr e - 70.2-e- -aannvlA Oviv-t 38 A , ( )-(4,-"J,4 ' „s ti 4,,.. 0 ,.., a ?CM, K--r '''y' 1 " 4 39 ,A eP /ArP4'L4 70/,,,,-1,.. ze, 703z.. CO ElFtet, gi) 40 (-pool, 1- At.ks4\ 0\ ert_ Pi--ers'eA 41 /44,64EL getarz_ --71/ a 24(,H~ 2,t) 42 cc AiNI --B ---( 0 (- ...,Vi, IA e vv e• 43 Rit a &\ .1v1i 1 t5 '--7 (0 a 54ovitrAeK fi t 44 (fil -S i 1((t 3 -/D5 Kunrick owe 45 494f( .4 ,74/iii 4-- 4i/ 77 )7 a/ /<2.i,,' c4 At., 46 , .b3 kik_ 1.,,,-y\iz- -lifol c-lA0.-mAN-0( -1>‘ - 47 (1 crS Q S0_,\---,c),e, ? \ cj 1 0 t \ LemVoi,\IQkf,jn 70 54— 4a.....2-Ace.._,A, 48 T-L,,_ ... -q_ yr / . 5 cP•14- 49 s--e„fr ,,t _,--,.-- ;co-., 76 ›--s- 50 CIL -e '49 ,e,.-L --C:;. 164,e_ 714 1:---4-e2t.....-J r)-- 51 COLYY1 .e Bmi&Acti 12‘co. -\.t.e'rvv'ood 1)1' 52 CASV100. ‘Q 0"\-€ C MCA_ le\ 0 12:2-I V\-Cew000l ,r 53 N\Q---k4 °L.- 1 C) ONacv‘z(-\ 4-.1". -t-es--0-ZO, 54 c_115.-7-f A, E- 1.4 _To1-1— Cloy ci.5____ 1/A-1-6Eie *1) 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 2 of 4 Page 107 of 275 APPENDIX J Resident Questionnaires Page 108 of 275 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT 30 January 2019 - 24 August 2025 PROJECT NAME: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Page 109 of 275 SURVEY QUESTIONS Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 1 of 47 Page 110 of 275 Q1 Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, b... 10 (13.5%) 10 (13.5%) 64 (86.5%) 64 (86.5%) Yes No Question options Mandatory Question (74 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 2 of 47 Page 111 of 275 Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Standing water in backyard during rainy years. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM Cul de sac additional storm drains and backyard storm and sewer drains with fairly steep grade. Special drainage is in place and seems to work OK. Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM front lawn collects water Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Standing water in the street in front of the mailbox due to the road sinking below the gutter. JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM The NW corner of Cahill Road and Village Drive always has standing water in the summer and ice in the winter making it impossible to access the sidewalk. Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Originally we had standing water in driveway and lawn. Through the City we were able to connect drain tile to the concrete storm sewer basin buried in the front yard (near street). Problem was solved. MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM Prior owners reported back yard had a partial mudslide following a heavy rainfall. Currently problem has been addressed. jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM Backyard- bottom of backyard has standing water when we get a lot of rain. PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM Grading. Water runs down the hill and the street drainage sometimes is insufficient. Q2 Please comment on the location and types of problems you have. Optional question (9 response(s), 65 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 3 of 47 Page 112 of 275 Q3 How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? 49 (66.2%) 49 (66.2%) 18 (24.3%) 18 (24.3%) 7 (9.5%) 7 (9.5%) Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned Question options Optional question (74 response(s), 0 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 4 of 47 Page 113 of 275 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM People drive very fast on Kemrich Drive and fleetwood. Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM trucks going fast Salaar 6/28/2025 03:11 PM W 70th St, people going too fast John Uecker 6/28/2025 03:43 PM NO sidewalks, we do not need them. Street is wide and has great walkability. Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Between Shannon and Fleetwood many drivers rapidly accelerate well beyond the speed limit. Many pedestrians, including young children are ofter present. Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Cars go very fast down Fleetwood and around the corners on Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Antrim. A pedestrian or bike lane would be helpful on Lee/Down/Kerry/Antrim to protect pedestrians. cristina notermann 6/29/2025 11:55 AM down fleetwood Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM Fleetwood is a popular connecting street between 70th and Dewey - we have a lot of thru traffic that drives excessive speeds. Neighbor traffic tends to be good speed as we all understand. Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Antrim Court sometimes has people speeding quite a bit. Also Antrim road, Kerry Road, Wexford Road, Down Road and Lee Valley road have quite a bit of speeding. It can be a little dangerous on these roads because there are not sidewalks and the turn from Wexford to Down road is sharp, blind and the trees grow way into the road. Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM 70th street and Tracy. People often speed and don't stop at the stop sign. Q4 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 5 of 47 Page 114 of 275 michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM northbound on fleetwood towards Lanham and westbound up Lanham beginning east of Fleetwood to w70th. People drive way to fast especially considering the amount of people who walk, kids playing, etc. Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Antrim RD, narrow and fast. Antrim Rd should not have street parking. Brutlag 6/29/2025 04:05 PM All of Fleetwood Drive - seems like a cut through. Not a lot of cars but travel fast Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM I live at 7201 Lanham Lane. We have 3 active children ages 13, 11, and 8 that use the front yard for soccer, lacrosse and running around. They also use the driveway and street for scooters and bikes. There generally aren't too may cars, but there are plenty of them that drive down the street well over 30 mph. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Traffic along 70th between Antrum and Tracy routinely runs above the speed limit, especially teenagers when the high school lets out. GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM We are on a cul-de-sac and only rarely get delivery vehicles that are traveling too quickly. desa0080 6/30/2025 04:32 PM I live on the middle of Fleetwood Dr and cars go very fast trying to connect between 70th and Dewey Hill Rd JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM Cahill Road and 70th Street are both posted at 25 mph which is nonsense. Should be minimum 30 mph or 40 like other equivalent streets like Gleason and Vernon. No vehicles, including City of Edina cars and trucks, go 25. Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Traffic using Fleetwood as a through street travels faster than the speed limit. The curve and elevation change between 7212 and 7216 creates a blind spot for traffic headed south. We’ve seen drivers have close calls with kids playing in driveways who have run out after balls into the street. We do not want to see the street narrowed as a solution. MTK Occasional fast cars. Not a significant issue, but kids play in front Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 6 of 47 Page 115 of 275 7/06/2025 05:17 PM yards/driveways. Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Our street has a serious curve on a hill with a slight blind spot. Speed is an issue. SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM Speed limit near 70th and Cahill is 25mph. I don't want speeding but this seems extremely slow. Could city consider raising it to 30 or 35? PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM The speed limit on Cahill is too low (especially for a hill). Chazbo711 7/21/2025 10:48 AM Cahill Rd between 70th and 78th. Most drivers respect the speed limit of 25 mph but some cars seem to go 40 mph. Please continue occasional radar/ticketing. Also, after school some (probably Edina HS students) speed down the hill on 70th heading east to the Cahill Rd intersection. francis.glover 7/23/2025 08:16 AM Fleetwood drive hill can sometimes be used as a cut through and some cars going down and up the hill can go faster than desired. Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM The curve on Fleetwood Drive doesn't have great visibility, and my kids ride their bikes on the street often. Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Coming up or down the hill on Antrim Road Frequently vehicles are parked and cause blind spots. Too many fast drivers are going to cause ahead on collision Optional question (27 response(s), 47 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 7 of 47 Page 116 of 275 Q5 How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? 65 (89.0%) 65 (89.0%) 6 (8.2%) 6 (8.2%)2 (2.7%) 2 (2.7%) Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned Question options Optional question (73 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 8 of 47 Page 117 of 275 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM I live on Village Drive. Traffic along Cahill has increased significantly since I moved in 8 years ago. Making it difficult to exit neighborhood. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM Sometimes there are a LOT of trucks in the neighborhood michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Antrim Rd should not have street parking. Brutlag 6/29/2025 04:05 PM Speed not volume Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM When Hwy. 62 backs up, 70th becomes a major thoroughfare of traffic from the freeway. Also heavy traffic when the high school lets out in the afternoons during the school year. desa0080 6/30/2025 04:32 PM 7208 Fleetwood Dr and same comment as above. Our street is full of kids and is a through street between 70th and Dewey Hill Rd Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM There is plenty of room on our street. Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM Delivery trucks drive tooooooo fast…..FedEx. Prime…..UPS…..all delivery trucks….too & from SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM More traffic on Cahill now with apartments and expecting more when apartments on 78th are completed (I realize that is technically Bloomington.) Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM On Antrim road Vehicles park on both sides of the road Q6 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 9 of 47 Page 118 of 275 Optional question (11 response(s), 63 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 10 of 47 Page 119 of 275 Q7 How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Excludes speed and traffic volumes. Examples of poor motorist behavior include rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively) 19 (25.7%) 19 (25.7%) 51 (68.9%) 51 (68.9%) 4 (5.4%) 4 (5.4%) Concerned Not Concerned Very Concerned Question options Optional question (74 response(s), 0 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 11 of 47 Page 120 of 275 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM Rolling through stop signs at 70th and Cahill. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM People drive very fast - well above speed limit on kemrich and fleetwood Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM I am close to 70th street they tend to speed up and there is a curve in the street which can be a issue Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Very concerned. My vehicle was totaled last year at the intersection of Dewey. Hill and Shannon. Westbound driver blew through the stop sign and broadsided me. He said he didn't know there was a stop sign. Many do rolling stops and assume they have right of way on Dewey, even though drivers on Shannon stopped. Also, at Cahill and Dewey a traffic circle should replace the goofy intersection currently there. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM (We live in a townhome community that's not a through street, so the only issues we've had were with previous residents who drove recklessly) Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Cars are not on their proper side of the street around the corners of Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Antrim. Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Again on that main road Antrim Road, Dublin road, Kerry Road Down road people drive aggressive and fast. I don't understand why they drive that way because they all live in the neighborhood. tiamat2pi 6/29/2025 01:49 PM 70th and Antrim - sometimes drivers coming on Antrim from the north don't realize cars coming from the left (up 70th) may not be turning right and don't yield. Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM People often don't stop at the stop sign. Q8 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 12 of 47 Page 121 of 275 michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM There are plenty of drivers, teens and adults, that drive too fast and do not pay attention to pedestrians. With no sidewalks, the only option for walking is in the road. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Motorists constantly coasting through the stop sign at 70th and Tracy Ave. Johnmlohmann 6/30/2025 06:41 AM Both rolling stops and ignoring healers signs are a problem Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM Large number of drivers treat stop signs, such as the ones at Shannon Drive/Dewey Hill Road, as yield signs, barely slowing down, and only actually stopping if another car is approaching at the same time. G 6/30/2025 09:39 PM It is a windy street and when it comes to a curve you are often head to head with another car. JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM Many cars have no mufflers or mufflers that enhance the noise. There should be a noise ordinance that limits noise. Vehicles with load mufflers should be stopped. druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM Just UPS and FedEx drivers driving a bit too fast. Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Motorists ignore the stop sign at Shannon and Kemrich for southbound traffic. jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM At Dewey Hill and Shannon, people sometimes do not stop at the stop sign. And at Kemrich and Shannon, people do not yield. Also- turning the corner at the top of Lanham Drive is dangerous. And the bushes at Lanham and 70th need to be cut down or trimmed as turning traffic often doesn’t see a car there when turning. PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM People basically ignore the stop signs along Dewey Hill. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 13 of 47 Page 122 of 275 Chazbo711 7/21/2025 10:48 AM There is a formal posted crosswalk across 70th from Hillside/Limerick Lanes. Cars rarely stop for pedestrians waiting to cross. Luckily, there are usually enough gaps in traffic to cross safely but we would never venture out into the street there unless the coast was clear (or we run across if there is a car in the distance). Most drivers seem to think they have the right of way there. I don’t know why. Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Antrim road up and down the hill Optional question (22 response(s), 52 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 14 of 47 Page 123 of 275 Q9 In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: 18 (35.3%) 18 (35.3%) 3 (5.9%) 3 (5.9%) 30 (58.8%) 30 (58.8%) Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, or running Question options Optional question (51 response(s), 23 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 15 of 47 Page 124 of 275 Q10 Do you feel any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? 34 (47.2%) 34 (47.2%) 38 (52.8%) 38 (52.8%) Yes No Question options Optional question (72 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 16 of 47 Page 125 of 275 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM 70th and Cahill. I feel safe as a driver but not as a pedestrian. Cars do not give walkers the right of way. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM kemrich and Shannon Drive Fleetwood and Latham Lane Kemrich Drive and Fleetwood drive Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM City hall thomaspmagne 6/28/2025 04:51 PM Shannon Dr. and Dewey Hill Rd. Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Dewey and Shannon and Dewey and Cahill cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM The bike lane on 7oth Street disappears as the street passes under Highway 100—feels dangerous for bicyclists. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM Kerry to Down is a loop that people pay little attention to the Wexford offshoot since it is lightly used, but heavy vegetation can impede driver's view when turning left. mas54po 6/29/2025 07:13 AM Antrum/70th; Make a 4 way stop Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Shannon and Lee Valley & Shannon and Kemrich Paul Cashin 6/29/2025 11:47 AM Hwy 62 and Tracy. (multiple issues) 1. Exiting from eastbound 62, the sightlines are poor, and increased traffic due to cut-through traffic during heavy traffic on 62 adds to problems. 2. Exiting from westbound 62, there is too much traffic, and it is a relatively complex intersection. Needs a stoplight. 3. Driving south on Tracy, the lanes are not aligned as you pass the 62 entrance/exit (westbound) forcing drivers to make a quick jog to the right to avoid the northbound traffic turning left onto 62 west. Compounded by cars nudging out from exit ramp onto Tracy given the heavy volume. 4. Similar issue when driving northbound and trying to turn left onto 62 west. Need to pay attention to make sure oncoming traffic notices that jog. 5. Tracy Ave Q11 Which intersection do you feel is unsafe? Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 17 of 47 Page 126 of 275 bridge over 62 is NOT pedestrian or bicycle friendly. cristina notermann 6/29/2025 11:55 AM lee vallye and down road and down road and wexford road Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Wexford, Down and Kerry is not very say. There should be sidewalks on that whole road from 70th to Dewey Hill. Also 70th and Antrim should have a signal. The idea that 70th has right of way and everyone else stops is not obvious and it leads to issues with safety. Valleyview and Antrim should have a signal. Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM 70th and Tracy ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM Lee Valley Road and Shannon Drive. With the stop sign only at one of the three directions, it's really confusing about who has the right of way. Same for the intersection at Kemrich and Shannon (confusion over right of way) Where Shannon Drive meets Lee Valley (coming from the northern most section of Shannon Drive), there is a large flower garden that blocks visibility around the corner. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM Kemrich/Shannon intersection. The southbound traffic on shannon has a stop sign, which is frequently ignored. The other two directions of traffic have no signage. Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM The 70th street and Antrim - terrible - people don’t Know 70th has right of way up to our neighborhood Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM 70th and Tracy. Why the stop sign? Trim trees to see the stop sign. 3 way stop at 70th and antrim - likely should be 4 way. people don't know 1 side does not have a stopsign. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM 70th and Tracy Johnmlohmann 6/30/2025 06:41 AM There are very many blind corners in the prospect hills neighborhood Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM The 3-way intersection at Shannon Drive and Kemrich Drive has only one stop sign, on Shannon south-bound. I have seen several narrow- Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 18 of 47 Page 127 of 275 miss accidents between vehicles north-bound on Shannon and west- bound on Kemrich, neither of whom has a stop sign. Also see above re Shannon/Dewey Hill. Cars sometimes run straight through the stops on Dewey Hill. GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM Shannon Drive at Dewey Hill. Stops signs along Dewey Hill are occasionally ignored by motorists. maggiedevoe 7/01/2025 05:26 AM My only concern is the intersection of 70th St & Antrim which is currently a 3-way stop (no stop for westbound 70th st drivers) and many motorists driving south on Antrim and making a left onto Eastbound 70th don't realize its only a 3-way stop so they don't yield to oncoming westbound 70th St vehicles ElectronLady 7/03/2025 10:10 AM The bend (Hairpin) on Down Road. Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Kemrich and Shannon. jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM 1) Shannon and Kemrich. 2) Lanham and 70th Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM Getting off on Tracy from either way on 62 Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM Stop sign@ Shanon & Lee Valley road or Down road Mwild 7/13/2025 05:47 PM 70th and Antrim Rd dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM Dewey Hill and Shannon drive 4 way stop Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM 70th Street & Antrim caution used for drivers not stopping - rolling through - off line Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM The site lines could be improved when traveling by car south on Lee Valley Road where it intersects with Northbound Shannon Drive due to vegetation Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 19 of 47 Page 128 of 275 SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM 70th and Cahill. It was re-done recently and turning from Cahill to 70th going East is EXTREMELY tight. Often cars have to move over or wait until there are no cars to make the right turn. Poor design. PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM There is a weird triangle boulevard where Cahill and Dewey Hill meet that creates really awkward turns. EdinaChris 8/06/2025 11:03 AM Curve at the top of lanham between fleetwood and 70th. Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM Dewey Hill & Shannon Drive rdizzo 8/11/2025 12:10 PM I feel all the intersections on Shannon Dr north of Dewey are unsafe at times because people don't seem to know who has the right of way all Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Antrim road and 70 th at the 3 way stop sign jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM Shannon at Kemrich Optional question (38 response(s), 36 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 20 of 47 Page 129 of 275 Q12 Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign)Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Insufficient lighting Other (please specify)Street(s) too wide Question options 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 12 19 23 12 12 1 9 Optional question (45 response(s), 29 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 21 of 47 Page 130 of 275 Q13 In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: 29 (69.0%) 29 (69.0%) 2 (4.8%) 2 (4.8%) 11 (26.2%) 11 (26.2%) Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, or running Question options Optional question (42 response(s), 32 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 22 of 47 Page 131 of 275 Q14 How frequently do you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood? 39 (54.2%) 39 (54.2%) 16 (22.2%) 16 (22.2%) 9 (12.5%) 9 (12.5%) 4 (5.6%) 4 (5.6%)4 (5.6%) 4 (5.6%) Very frequently (daily or near daily)Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Never Question options Optional question (72 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 23 of 47 Page 132 of 275 Q15 If you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop)Access transit Other (please specify) Commute to/from work Question options 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 66 7 1 7 Optional question (66 response(s), 8 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 24 of 47 Page 133 of 275 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM Slower traffic and better intersections (safer for kids if motorists stop at intersections) Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM nothing John Uecker 6/28/2025 03:43 PM NO sidewalks needed. Let’s keep the assessment price down. Neighborhood is great for walking and jogging and biking as is. Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM Less government cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM NA peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM none Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Marked pedestrian or bike lanes, better lighting tiamat2pi 6/29/2025 01:49 PM more sidewalks ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM The stretch of Shannon between Kemrich and Lee Valley is really unsafe for walking. A sidewalk or a bike/walk lane would be very helpful. Same for the stretch of Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Antrim. Those routes are used by kids walking to bus stops or Valley View and EHS. And with the curves, visibility is hard making it feel unsafe. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM None - if we want to walk we walk - it’s the hills that are hard to come up Q16 If you don't walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 25 of 47 Page 134 of 275 Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM more sidewalks Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM More sidewalk access or a dedicated area of the road for pedestrians would be appreciated. We love living in Edina, but we miss sidewalk access that we had when we lived in Minneapolis. Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM None. There are lots of walkers in my neighborhood; I'm just not usually one of them. There is no impediment. Traffic on most streets, except Dewey Hill, is light and usually moves fairly slowly, given the winding streets and hilly terrain. CharlieBray1 6/30/2025 03:22 PM Having sidewalks will NOT increase the number of people walking in this neighborhood. EITAN MEDINI 7/02/2025 08:28 AM none Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Nothing sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM we do not want sidewalks. they would ruin the neighborhood. stay out of our neighborhood, it is doing fine the way it is. NO to sidewalks! Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM We need a sign indicating children at play. We need a complete asphalt re-do of our street. No resurfacing and we no need sidewalks. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM None needed. Leave as is. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM None Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Side walks A caution sign on hill jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM fewer potholes and huge cracks Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 26 of 47 Page 135 of 275 Optional question (23 response(s), 51 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 27 of 47 Page 136 of 275 Q17 How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? 12 (16.9%) 12 (16.9%) 10 (14.1%) 10 (14.1%) 18 (25.4%) 18 (25.4%) 13 (18.3%) 13 (18.3%) 18 (25.4%) 18 (25.4%) Very frequently (daily or near daily)Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Never Question options Optional question (71 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 28 of 47 Page 137 of 275 Q18 If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop)Commute to/from work Other (please specify)Access transit Question options 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 46 16 2 2 Optional question (50 response(s), 24 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 29 of 47 Page 138 of 275 Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM Less government. Take out all bike lanes. Move bikes lanes off busy streets. Roads were built for cars. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM NA peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM none Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Bike or pedestrian lanes ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM Same answer as above. The windy roads in our neighborhood are tough for visibility and it can feel unsafe to bike. Our kids would like to bike to school (EHS) but without a bike lane, it feels unsafe. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM None - we are very close to a bike path if we want to bike Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM remove the hills on valleuview and 70th ;) Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM I'm generally quite happy with the bicycle lanes around Edina. I bike regularly around Edina on my road bike and feel comfortable with the bicycle lanes. I also bike to and from the Braemar mountain bike trails with my children and the access is pretty good. maggiedevoe 7/01/2025 05:26 AM Existing bike lanes and traffic patterns support bicyclists today. EITAN MEDINI 7/02/2025 08:28 AM none Q19 If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 30 of 47 Page 139 of 275 Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Nothing is needed to enhance the ability to bike druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM None. The neighborhood is reasonably accommodating to cycling. Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM No res construction needed in our neighborhood. Plenty of room on our roads. We walk with group of 5 daily. sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM sidewalks would ruin the neighborhood. Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM I don’t want a bike path in neighborhood Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Our street is a hill, we live at the top of a hill. Can't reconstruct that and we 100% oppose sidewalks. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM Leave as is. No sidewalks either. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM None PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM Bike lanes would be great. Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM Not interested Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM My kids bike on Fleetwood Drive often, and I worry about northbound cars (coming up the hill and around the curve) having bad sightlines to see them. Optional question (22 response(s), 52 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 31 of 47 Page 140 of 275 Q20 How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? 5 (6.8%) 5 (6.8%) 12 (16.4%) 12 (16.4%) 24 (32.9%) 24 (32.9%) 32 (43.8%) 32 (43.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Rarely (less than once per month)Never Very frequently (daily or near daily) Question options Optional question (73 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 32 of 47 Page 141 of 275 Q21 How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? 2 (2.7%) 2 (2.7%) 14 (19.2%) 14 (19.2%) 15 (20.5%) 15 (20.5%) 28 (38.4%) 28 (38.4%) 14 (19.2%) 14 (19.2%) Very frequently (daily or near daily)Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Never Question options Optional question (73 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 33 of 47 Page 142 of 275 Q22 How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? 38 (52.8%) 38 (52.8%) 22 (30.6%) 22 (30.6%) 9 (12.5%) 9 (12.5%)2 (2.8%) 2 (2.8%)1 (1.4%) 1 (1.4%) Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Question options Optional question (72 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 34 of 47 Page 143 of 275 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM Would like to continue to have availability of on street parking as needed Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM would like to have it on both sides cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM It rarely happens, but for several days this week, while a neighboring apartment complex was repaving its roadway, residents parked their cars in the bike line on Cahill Road. It felt unsafe for bikers. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM none Melissa Cohen 6/28/2025 08:12 PM If cars park on both sides of the road, it can be difficult to fit a vehicle in between. Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM Worried that sidewalks will reduce the width of our street and not allow for easy street parking. We have a steep driveway so our guests really can only park on street. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Antrim Rd should not have street parking by 70th. Gets very crowded, and the living facility staff park on the street, making it very narrow. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM On Lee Valley Circle, when people park on both sides of the street it becomes a one lane road. I'd like to see no parking signs on one side of the street to keep it open for two way traffic. Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Plenty of on street parking druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM Neighbors visitors often park in front of mailbox. Q23 Any additional comments about parking? Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 35 of 47 Page 144 of 275 Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Please don’t narrow the street. When there are cars parking in the street, they tend to be associated with large gatherings at neighboring houses. If the street goes down to the widths indicated on Better Together, we are concerned about a lack of space for traffic heading in both directions. MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM No sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM no to sidewalks. they would ruin the neighborhood. Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Our street is wide, parking is excellent. Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM I drive down our street very slow…people often come up shannon turn on the side of street …to cut corner…I away stop to be sure a car in not coming north on Shannon…on my side of street dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM I appreciate the ability to park on either side of the street Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM Keep them off the street as you are doing (restrictions) SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM N/A regarding parking. I live in a townhouse association not right on the street. Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM Everything is ok jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM no Optional question (21 response(s), 53 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q24 Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 36 of 47 Page 145 of 275 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM Village Drive looks like and drives like a lunar landing. It has patch on top of patch. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM we want the neighborhood to be a safe place for kids to play, pedestrians, and bikers Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM street is in poor condition. I dont think we need sidewalks Salaar 6/28/2025 03:11 PM When they came to do construction, they tore up the entire ground and left and didn't fix it Alan Weiner 6/28/2025 03:46 PM The area is a mishmash of curvy and hilly roads. I have lived at my current address for 18 years and outside of the absolute poor quality of the roads, we have no issues with speeding or wreck less driving. If you are not from our neighborhood, you will drive really slow because of the twisty hilly roads and the potholes and road breaking apart. We do not need any sidewalks or wider roads, we just need new grading, paving, curbs and proper drainage at the low points of the road. Sidewalks will ruin the quaintness of the entire Park Knolls Neiborhood. I love all of the green space we have and like I have said already, the twisty and hilly roads are not conducive to speeding or wreck less driving. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM Appreciate the city patching up the potholes on Village Drive this week. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM Asphalt sorely needs to be replaced. The snow plows annually tear up any repairs due to the necessary maneuvering in the cul de sac to remove snow. Road seems to be getting narrower due to overgrowth from the sides. It's very limited traveled road, so not a big deal. Our driveway apron is crumbling asphalt, so would like further information on how much concrete apron we can expect and how much we might need to prepare prior to reconstruction. Melissa Cohen 6/28/2025 08:12 PM Before a sidewalk plan is finalized, I expect that homeowners whose properties are affected by this will be contacted and have an opportunity for input. With our house on the corner of Fleetwood Drive and Lanham Lane, we are concerned about the long length of sidewalk that may be installed on our property and the long term impact of that (upkeep, snow removal, liability, etc.) Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 37 of 47 Page 146 of 275 mas54po 6/29/2025 07:13 AM End of street--asphault in severe disrepair. Snow pushed into our property and tears up grass/landscaping. We are having extensive landscaping done and would like to not have snow pushed into our yard Paul Cashin 6/29/2025 11:47 AM Concrete roadways are brutal on our cars' suspensions. Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM Given Fleetwood is a thru street, there is considerably more traffic than one might think which causes the street to get tight/dangerous during busy times. Delivery trucks/workers/contractors parking on side while busy thru traffic is coming makes it wide enough for only one car right now Please consider other utility projects - such as US Internet, Centerpoint, Xcel, etc. - to minimize the yard impacts. Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Street conditions are kind of bad in the area between 70th and Dewey Hill road. I feel like Hilary Lane should have been reengineered when it was resurfaced. I don't understand how the standing water on the sidewalk and road hasn't been fixed. There are a lot of kids who walk down Antrim Road, Dublin and Kerry. When I moved in the neighbors said they shouldn't walk on the road because it is dangerous and he was right. The road is narrow and there is a lot of trees which makes it more dangerous. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM We'd prefer a marginally wider street with a bike/walking lane as opposed to a sidewalk. Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM We live on a quiet circle - it is perfect the way it is Somehow the city thinks everyone wants the urban smashed together setting . Peaceful is nice . If you’d like to know what would be nice is overhaul Cahill - it looks like a slum - rental U hauls - the buildings are tired . We deserve better - please help Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Guests park on Antrim Ct, and it is safe and out of the way. C 6/29/2025 07:13 PM It’s fine. No need for excess construction projects, often taking years at a time for minimal change. Brian Lee Valley Circle was supposed to be reconstructed in 2020 (if I Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 38 of 47 Page 147 of 275 6/30/2025 06:23 AM remember correctly). The street is pitted and breaking apart and I have heard nothing of plans to repair or replace the roadway surface. GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM As our neighborhood expressed several years ago to City Council, we still feel that our small section of this project could be adequately addressed via a mill and overlay approach, rather than a full reconstruction. CharlieBray1 6/30/2025 03:22 PM We do not need sidewalks here. This is a residential street and it would be a giant waste of money. There is not enough traffic to warrant this spending. Anything I can do to prevent this from happening I will do. G 6/30/2025 09:39 PM Please do not narrow the street ( Antrim to Shannon) or put curbs in on either side from Antrim off 70th street to Shannon. It’s windy and even when you take the curve wide, it gets close to coming in contact with another car. If the street is narrowed in any way or curbs are put in there won’t be any space for cars to pass by. In the winter, the snow will make it even harder. Parking for maintenance vehicles, and guests will further the hinderance and will make it all but impossible to get two cars through. Please do not narrow Antrim road to Shannon road. It won’t work. JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM Speed limit too slow. Village Drive is a disaster. Needs repair. swankefamily 7/02/2025 06:53 AM Traffic volume--both vehicle and pedestrian--is minimal on our dead- end street. We currently don't have sidewalks, and we don't need them, as people can walk safely without them. Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM The streets are wide enough that sidewalks seem redundant and unnecessary. There is no need. It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t actually exist. Karin Wentz 7/03/2025 06:01 AM We hope our street (Down Road) stays as is--for example, we would strongly discourage adding sidewalks. The trees along the street are a desirable feature to keep, and these might need to be removed if sidewalks are added. druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM Neighbors who intentionally put yard debris into the street expecting the city to remove it is unacceptable and should be punished. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 39 of 47 Page 148 of 275 Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM I am strongly against adding sidewalks to fleetwood drive as it would make the roads smaller and we do not have enough traffic for this to make any sense. Use our money elsewhere. MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM Wondering when Edina plans to upgrade our street? jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM Our neighborhood does not need sidewalks. It’s a low traffic area. Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM I’m not interested in getting the sidewalk or bike path. Will make road to small and to congested Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Other than Lanham Lane is a pothole disaster and no amount of resurfacing will help. Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM snow plow always leaves huge pile of snow @ end of our driveway….is by the mail box & unssafe dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM The streets feel safe and everyone drives carefully as it is not a through street so we all know the people coming and going. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM No sidewalks - people have plenty of nearby parks. all it would add is more upkeep and costs for village and taxpayers. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM The street is in good condition and no sidewalks or bike paths are needed or wanted. rm 7/20/2025 01:41 PM Our street has minimal car traffic. Lots of people walk and bike with no problem Liz Moore 7/23/2025 11:47 AM It's very safe. Students from nearby high school practice skiing using roller blades. Our street is hilly and perfect for this. No sidewalks please. Lanham Lane is great without them. Debasish N Mallick No issues experienced over the last 25 years Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 40 of 47 Page 149 of 275 7/28/2025 01:33 PM EdinaChris 8/06/2025 11:03 AM Please don't add sidewalks to Kemrich Drive as they aren't necessary given the low traffic volume. It will also damage the curb appeal of many homes. Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM I know that there is a plan to put a sidewalk on Fleetwood Drive. From my perspective, I don't feel unsafe walking on the street (and see people walking all of the time). I do have safety concerns regarding kids biking on our streets, however. I'm worried that if we had a sidewalk (and my understanding is that bikers, maybe with the exception of very young kids, are not supposed to bike on sidewalks), that the narrower street will make it even more unsafe for kids to bike on the street. CJM 8/08/2025 06:58 AM Kemrich Drive is very quiet street, walking and biking is very safe. I walk multiple times a day throughout Kemrich, Lanham, and Fleetwood. Many people walk in groups and with strollers along side their children on bikes, it is very safe to do so. Sidewalks are not needed and would even prohibit the group from staying together. Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Cars speed coming around the bend at Antrim Road and Dublin Often drinking on wrong side of road jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM Don't put in barrier curbing. It forces bikes farther from the edge. Likewise, narrowing the street also forces bikes and pedestrians closer to the traffic, contrary to the talk about being bike friendly. Drive through Braemar on Hillary and see the flooding only where there is curbing. JamesD 6/28/2025 11:32 AM 7204 Lanham Lane Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM 5501 Village Drive Optional question (42 response(s), 32 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q25 What is your address? Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 41 of 47 Page 150 of 275 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM 5804 kemrich Drive Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM 7008 Lanham ln Salaar 6/28/2025 03:11 PM 7001 Lee Valley Circle John Uecker 6/28/2025 03:43 PM 7105 Alan Weiner 6/28/2025 03:46 PM 7105 Tralee Drive Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM 123 condo dr thomaspmagne 6/28/2025 04:51 PM 7125 Shannon Dr. Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM 5805 Kemrich Dr. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM 5544 Village Drive, Edina 55439 peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM 7032 Wexford Rd Melissa Cohen 6/28/2025 08:12 PM 7100 Fleetwood Drive mas54po 6/29/2025 07:13 AM 7117 Tralee Dr. Edina 55439 Nancy Drake 6/29/2025 09:20 AM 5900 Lee Valley Road Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM 7112 Shannon Drive Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 42 of 47 Page 151 of 275 Paul Cashin 6/29/2025 11:47 AM 7009 Weston Cir cristina notermann 6/29/2025 11:55 AM 7221 fleetwood drive Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM 7108 Fleetwood Dr Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM 7109 Antrim Court tiamat2pi 6/29/2025 01:49 PM 7001 Dublin Road Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM 7020 Weston Circle ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM 7100 Shannon Drive michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM 7017 Lanham Lane Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM 6000 Dublin Circle Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM 7101 Antrim CT Brutlag 6/29/2025 04:05 PM 7109 Fleetwood Drive Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM 7201 Lanham Ln C 6/29/2025 07:13 PM Kemrich Drive Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM 7015 Lee Valley Circle Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 43 of 47 Page 152 of 275 Johnmlohmann 6/30/2025 06:41 AM 7101 Tralee Dr Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM 5901 Lee Valley Road GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM 7028 Shannon Drive CharlieBray1 6/30/2025 03:22 PM 7212 Fleetwood Drive desa0080 6/30/2025 04:32 PM 7208 Fleetwood Drive Edina MN 55439-1810 G 6/30/2025 09:39 PM 5908 Lee Valley Road JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM 5501 Village Drive maggiedevoe 7/01/2025 05:26 AM 6004 Dublin Circle tamie 7/01/2025 09:14 AM 5511 village drive swankefamily 7/02/2025 06:53 AM 7020 Shannon Drive, Edina, MN 55439 EITAN MEDINI 7/02/2025 08:28 AM 7121 Fleetwood Dr Edina MN 55439 Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM 5805 Shannon Dr. Karin Wentz 7/03/2025 06:01 AM 7029 Down Road, Edina, MN 55439 ElectronLady 7133 SHANNON DR Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 44 of 47 Page 153 of 275 7/03/2025 10:10 AM Barbara Grossman 7/04/2025 08:39 AM 7300 Lanham Lane druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM 7113 Shannon Drive terrirovick 7/05/2025 10:18 AM 7100 Down Road Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM 7216 Fleetwood Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM 7105 fleetwood dr MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM 7112 Lanham Lane sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM 5725 Kemrich Dr Keith Solsvig 7/08/2025 01:02 PM 5713 Kemrich Drive jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM 5721 Kemrich Drive Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM 7024 lanham lane Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM 7041 Lanham Lane (Transcribed by City Staff) Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM 7104 Shannon Drive, Edina, MN 55439 John F Kortebein 7/13/2025 12:14 PM 7028 Lanham Lane Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 45 of 47 Page 154 of 275 Mwild 7/13/2025 05:47 PM 7013 Dublin Rd dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM 5708 Kemrich Drive Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM 7024 Down Road (Transcribed by City Staff) Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM 7104 Shannon Drive (Transcribed by City Staff) SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM 5553 VIllage Drive PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM 5800 Kemrich Drive. rm 7/20/2025 01:41 PM 7217 Fleetwood Drive Chazbo711 7/21/2025 10:48 AM 5511 West 70th St Edina MN 55439 francis.glover 7/23/2025 08:16 AM 7201 Fleetwood Drive Liz Moore 7/23/2025 11:47 AM 7220 Lanham Lane (Transcribed by City staff) Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM 5709 Kemrich Drive, Edina, MN 55439 EdinaChris 8/06/2025 11:03 AM 5721 Kemrich Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM 7201 Fleetwood Dr CJM 8/08/2025 06:58 AM 5705 Kemrich Drive Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 46 of 47 Page 155 of 275 rdizzo 8/11/2025 12:10 PM 7100 Shannon Dr Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM 6 Antrim Terrace jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM 5904 Lee Valley Road Mandatory Question (74 response(s)) Question type: Single Line Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 30 January 2019 to 24 August 2025 Page 47 of 47 Page 156 of 275 APPENDIX K Correspondence from Residents Page 157 of 275 APPENDIX L Proposed Typical Sections Page 158 of 275 APPENDIX M Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 159 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.2 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Parklawn Court Roadway Reconstruction Project Action Requested: Review and comment on the proposed 2026 roadway reconstruction project. Information/Background: Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler, Senior Project Engineer Ben Jore and Graduate Engineer Chris Moore will present the Prospect Knolls A/C/D roadway reconstruction project. See attached draft engineering study. Supporting Documentation: 1. Draft Engineering Study 2. Appendices Page 160 of 275 ENGINEERING STUDY PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Parklawn Court IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 OCTOBER 17, 2025 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Page 161 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local concrete streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, construction of new sidewalk, lining of sanitary sewer, localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $X_________. 47.40% of the roadway cost will be funded through property taxes and 52.60% will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $X_________ per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $X_________ and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are estimated to cost $X_________ and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure” and the “Strong Foundations” City budget goal. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. LOCATION: The project includes Parklawn Court. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Page 162 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways Parklawn Court was originally constructed in 1966. Various concrete panels have been replaced over the years, but no maintenance has been performed over the entire street (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Parklawn Court Neighborhood, 1967 Parklawn Court, as a concrete street, has integral curb. The roadway width is 36’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 8” of concrete pavement over an apparent aggregate base followed by a combination of silty sand and sand with silt soils. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc. for bituminous streets ; popouts, longitudinal and transverse cracking, potholes, etc. for concrete streets). The average Page 163 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 4 PCI for the City of Edina is 78 and the average PCI for Parklawn Court is 51. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition Traffic and Crash Data Given the location and context of this project, staff did not measure traffic volumes or speeds. It is assumed that the volume and speed are comparable to most local streets in the City (≤ 1,000 vehicles per day, 85th-percentile speeds ≤ 30 miles per hour, respectively). Crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no pedestrian facilities within the project area. There are sidewalks on Parklawn Avenue and W 76th Street immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix B). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area. The project area is less than ¼ mile (or a 1-minute bike ride) from the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (see Appendix C). Transit Facilities Metro Transit’s Local Route 6 serves this neighborhood, with bus stops along Parklawn Avenue and W 76th Street. Local Routes 537 and 540 also operate within a ½ mile of the project area. Most of the bus stops adjacent to the project area are Page 164 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 5 accessible by sidewalks; none have shelters. Parklawn Court is also within the service area of the City’s CloverRide circulator bus service. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of SECTION INCOMPLETE Watermain The watermain system consists of SECTION INCOMPLETE Storm Sewer The storm sewer network is in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The system consists of SECTION INCOMPLETE Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present along Parklawn Court. These utilities are a combination of overhead facilities located in backyards and underground utilities along the boulevards. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendices B and C, there are no proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and people with disabilities. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Page 165 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 6 Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges, and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan SECTION INCOMPLETE Climate Action Plan The CAP identified the following strategies that align with this roadway reconstruction project. Transportation and Land Use (TL) 1: Decrease community-wide vehicle miles traveled by 7% by 2030. Action TL 1-2: Accelerate building on-street and off-street protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas and fill connectivity gaps as identified in the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. TL 2: Double public transit commuter ridership from 3.3% to 6.6% by 2030. Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. COMMENTS REQUESTED Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. COMMENTS REQUESTED Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 23, 2025, a draft engineering study was provided for review. [2025 COMMENTS] Page 166 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 7 Residents Residents were invited to an informational presentation and were able to directly ask questions to staff in August 2025. Residents were notified of a recorded video version of the August 2025 informational presentation posted on the Better Together Edina website, where residents were able to ask questions to staff from the Better Together Edina website, as well as telephone and email. Materials from the August 2025 informational presentation can be found in Appendix I. On June 25, 2025, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation and local drainage problems within the project area. Unique feedback was requested on potential support of sidewalks on Parklawn Court. Unfortunately, only one resident completed the questionnaire. We will re-engage the owners and residents again before the Public Hearing to attempt to get more responses. The full questionnaire and one response can be found in Appendix J. Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix K. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. The proposed improvements also align with the Budget Work Plan values and goals developed by the City Council and staff. Roadways Typical Section The concrete roadway is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. A minimum of 8” of aggregate base material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous non-wear and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. Parklawn Court is designated as a Local Street in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalks or 24’ with an 8’ shared-use path or 5’ sidewalk on one side. Parklawn Court is proposed to be 27’ wide to accommodate the higher frequency of larger vehicles that serve the adjacent multi- family properties. Cul-de-Sac Page 167 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 8 The cul-de-sac bulb is proposed to be reduced in size to the City’s standard 70’ diameter. This size will accommodate large emergency vehicles while also reducing impervious surfaces within the neighborhood. Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. Parking is proposed to be restricted within the cul-de-sac bulb, with one-sided parking provided along the roadway to allow space for proposed sidewalks on both sides. The existing and proposed roadway widths, sidewalks and parking recommendations are also shown in Figure 3, Table 1 and Appendix L. Existing 36’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed 27’ road width, one-sided parking Figure 3: Parklawn Court Street Existing Roadway Width (face to face), feet Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Sidewalk Width, feet Boulevard Width, feet Parking Parklawn Court 36 27 5 0-5 Southeast Side Cul-de-sac 97.5* 70* 5 0-5 None * Diameter of the cul-de-sac Page 168 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 9 Table 1: Street Widths, Sidewalks and Parking Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs will conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Multi-Modal Transportation Staff seeks to balance the recommendations of the City’s guiding documents (Living Streets Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan), feedback from affected residents, available right-of-way and potential tree and infrastructure impacts. Staff is proposing new sidewalks along both sides of Parklawn Court and around the cul-de-sac bulb (see Figure 4). Figure 4: Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Although no new facilities are recommended in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, the proposed sidewalks are consistent with the character of the neighborhood as many adjacent local streets have pedestrian facilities on both sides (Parklawn Avenue, West 76th Street and Gallagher Drive). The proposed sidewalks also support the Climate Action Plan goal to “accelerate building…sidewalks and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas.” Compared to Edina overall, this neighborhood has a higher percentage of population identifying as Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC); a higher percentage of population in poverty; a higher percentage of population under the age of 18; and a higher percentage of population Page 169 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 10 that is foreign-born. The proposed multi-modal facilities will improve access, mobility and safety for these populations. The grass boulevards that will separate the new curb and the proposed sidewalks are proposed to be 5’-wide but may vary depending on construction conflicts. Separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and portions of the existing sidewalks will be reconstructed as necessary. The sidewalks will be maintained by adjacent property owners as they are not within state or county right-of-way, along Municipal State Aid routes, or included in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan. Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities in this project area. Transit Facilities An accessible boarding area (also referred to as an ADA pad) will be constructed at the bus stop adjacent to the project area. Staff will coordinate with Metro Transit on the design and location of the pad. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain SECTION INCOMPLETE Storm Sewer Because the existing curb and gutter are integral with the concrete pavement, they will be replaced as part of the roadway pavement reconstruction, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. The existing drainage structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition as well as the proposed roadway width change. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Increasing stormwater storage in Fred Richards Park will be necessary in the future to help reduce flood risk on Parklawn Court. Street Lighting The City owned street lighting system will be removed and replaced by Xcel Energy due to its poor condition. Page 170 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 11 Staff is preparing an agreement with Xcel Energy for the proposed street lighting system work. The agreement will detail each agency’s responsibilities regarding construction, cost allocation, ownership, and future maintenance. Ownership and maintenance of the street lighting system on Parklawn Court will transition from the City to Xcel Energy. Private Utilities Staff will meet with representatives of several private utility companies in December 2025, to discuss the proposed 2026 reconstruction project and preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. RIGHT-OF-WAY/ EASEMENTS: Existing roadway right-of-way for Parklawn Court is 60’. It is anticipated that this project can be constructed within the existing ROW. A portion of the in place landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $_________, (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Street Lighting $ _______ Special Assessments Roadway $ _______ Special Assessments Roadway $ _______ Property Taxes Roadway Total: $ _______ Sanitary Sewer $ __________ Watermain $ _______ Storm Sewer $ _______ Utility Total: $ _______ City Utility Funds $ __________ Sidewalk Total: PACS Fund Project Total: $ __________ Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 41.5 roadway residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Parklawn Page 171 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 12 Court project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $_______ (see Figure 5). The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix M. Figure 5: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Receive Engineering Study December 9, 2025 Open Public Improvement Hearing December 9, 2025 Close Public Improvement Hearing December 11, 2025 Public Improvement Hearing Council Decision December 17, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2026 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure along Parklawn Court. APPENDIX: Page 172 of 275 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 October 17, 2025 13 A. Crash Data B. Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Street Lights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H. Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication I. Neighborhood Informational Presentation Materials J. Resident Questionnaire K. Correspondence from Residents L. Proposed Typical Sections M. Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 173 of 275 APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Page 174 of 275 Parklawn Court Reported Crashes 2015-2025 DateInfoCrash Type# January 2015 March 2022 Icy road condition, hit light pole Intoxicated driver hit light pole Ran off road Ran off road1 September 2023 Eastbound vehicle turn left into parking lot was hit by WB driver approaching Parklawn Ave Left turn 2 July 2021 April 2024 Parked car rear-ended Parked car rear-ended Rear-end Rear-end3 October 2026 Parked car rear-endedRear-end4 Page 175 of 275 APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Page 176 of 275 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree kNineMileCree kNine Mile Creek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use PathExisting Sidewalk Proposed Shared-Use PathProposed SidewalkProposed Twin Loops Page 177 of 275 APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map Page 178 of 275 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree k NineMileCreek Ni ne Mile Cre ek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use Path Proposed Shared-Use Path Proposed Twin Loops Advisory Bike Lane Existing Bike Boulevard Bikeable ShoulderExisting Shared Bike LaneExisting Bike LaneExisting Buffered Bike Lane Proposed Bike BoulevardProposed Bike LaneProposed Buffered Bike Lane Page 179 of 275 APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks Page 180 of 275 APPENDIX E Street Lights and Signs Page 181 of 275 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Page 182 of 275 Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy Page 183 of 275 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 184 of 275 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 185 of 275 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 186 of 275 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 187 of 275 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 188 of 275 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 189 of 275 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 190 of 275 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 191 of 275 APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Page 192 of 275 APPENDIX H Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication Page 193 of 275 APPENDIX I Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials Page 194 of 275 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 1 K: i, cA-4-40) 101A-2.f eei-AA.... 70 2„6 I frz_RF_Jr 2 ,--(Er---F G /55 EL i3e-z--e--.. Zoo ? Z-4-A/ 44 ik,1 3 -)" OLP ; 11, Uje_Ary\----c 110QQt Down Psockct 4 -pk - -, (1 -P--,,5 <- F 1 (-_) .. ... r, (( 7,00 siiin h (,-, Dv- 5 70‘...4_,,,...,t.c.„s 5----,7 ''<i o!... Ts+, 6 -Lt.Sia V) -- ,(4n gs - C 3 ki\i - 7o TI- 7 e--) 4 V \, c&)1•)te -) jcV -- 1-1M1 S- .1 (A) 3T) 8 Th(1"4- 47-ky 467-0011 ‘ oo 5 6 06frA 6-e,1.e.) 9 X / Fi-e 44 4) fte-i" 6,5-0/ * 1/a 7 D 10 ) wt Sal bik4k5i,,14‘44/242_ 1-c32,c) Slukyn&AA-CDr. 11 Ga ry -. ate,/ Icy tc-Tc/ins5c,r- .SS D/ 11;//a6e, 4.)r, 12 A/ 4.7,-, ki g_e_4e-is 1,1 1$ 13 , 20-vQ.., LOMMe_____k II -Apn __,_-\--4Th-1--c;, 14 6( r.--\-- C-1-7 1 \-1--..ct 1°2 O u - )e,,s, Cltr do _ 15 gkk.b i_.%/0„1 LAI3is 7671h KL=-_-)e__, E0,6,- 16 0,(2-1A--) C-* )3T--c, r NAL-- ---/ (2..-:' c L-e-e-1-t,/- 6 %) D4--t 17 M -A-1-1 l_,S T.- 0 -7/c4 riee/A)ddd ipri:/z 18 <-3: k ..\ ( j.x. cf 6,- -110 .c 1-(s2eh,,,d..,t Pr,-e 19 -L. ,,,-, ' nfz_t_&-s-L. /-6,, ----7 k 09 r-, ffil-LaoD -Pal 0 e- 20 fiecipte (-L©P 721-2_ I—A p(A- 7z2V /i4All--1/7(-n:x4 (5-ei/i ijA4-70 ci, or 21 1)OiLl- UPt-d0 - ALPS ( -C:9 22 t1606 ter00 i'df 7 //kat Rrib`ve 23 AoolNeAl.,e_ i\ActiAao/ 55-26 YI'llat Dr i,i t_ 24 4t,d64;126G ° g/a4 57/7 // ':- , ii4.4fAR 25 PZ--k 04,..ess _ I Lo L 1 A g,J 26 44,a f -95 ao G,&,, 7100 Poies000l DY -7`2-61r F ( (d-i .3-.& Dr. 27 /' ,- , D,A 28 -If \ (A6v a-- -l-e1152-44. ' MA La h hcon tr) 29 b-A-4-‘`-- -2Y---4)--7--)-,-- 4 Zei--/ -k,,.. 7 o o 30 7e/ < e_ IA cy-,4_14 55- Li c w_ 7o t-4 5 .r Page 1 of 4 Page 195 of 275 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 31 i.e..' -1/1 t„,t,L5 .) 07 6-11 ir ' \v‘ (-1- 32 Pc,t,,1 d c•cru 0 %laid kekket L L 33 --Iv.S.W\ Syr re- LA 1 OCI'l La eti-vt," 34 re('',0f„rby --"x),( v .,..7^ 35 Veco n t ca, er 44(w.e.V _.-Si knol 701 St.., 36 k(-1--, .\ Sai \\ a--_SA '1113 (A r-rk_cz --\" 0 6-1 37 Cr e - 70.2-e- -aannvlA Oviv-t 38 A , ( )-(4,-"J,4 ' „s ti 4,,.. 0 ,.., a ?CM, K--r '''y' 1 " 4 39 ,A eP /ArP4'L4 70/,,,,-1,.. ze, 703z.. CO ElFtet, gi) 40 (-pool, 1- At.ks4\ 0\ ert_ Pi--ers'eA 41 /44,64EL getarz_ --71/ a 24(,H~ 2,t) 42 cc AiNI --B ---( 0 (- ...,Vi, IA e vv e• 43 Rit a &\ .1v1i 1 t5 '--7 (0 a 54ovitrAeK fi t 44 (fil -S i 1((t 3 -/D5 Kunrick owe 45 494f( .4 ,74/iii 4-- 4i/ 77 )7 a/ /<2.i,,' c4 At., 46 , .b3 kik_ 1.,,,-y\iz- -lifol c-lA0.-mAN-0( -1>‘ - 47 (1 crS Q S0_,\---,c),e, ? \ cj 1 0 t \ LemVoi,\IQkf,jn 70 54— 4a.....2-Ace.._,A, 48 T-L,,_ ... -q_ yr / . 5 cP•14- 49 s--e„fr ,,t _,--,.-- ;co-., 76 ›--s- 50 CIL -e '49 ,e,.-L --C:;. 164,e_ 714 1:---4-e2t.....-J r)-- 51 COLYY1 .e Bmi&Acti 12‘co. -\.t.e'rvv'ood 1)1' 52 CASV100. ‘Q 0"\-€ C MCA_ le\ 0 12:2-I V\-Cew000l ,r 53 N\Q---k4 °L.- 1 C) ONacv‘z(-\ 4-.1". -t-es--0-ZO, 54 c_115.-7-f A, E- 1.4 _To1-1— Cloy ci.5____ 1/A-1-6Eie *1) 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 2 of 4 Page 196 of 275 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting –August 26, 2025 Page 197 of 275 Agenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •Project Scopes •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Questions Page 198 of 275 Engineering - Design & Construction Division Brandon Freeman Sr. Engineering Technician Chris Moore Graduate Engineer Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer Chad Millner Director of Engineering Jon Moore Sr. Engineering Technician Tom Haataja Sr. Engineering Technician Ben Jore Sr. Project Engineer Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator Page 199 of 275 2026 Project Areas •Parklawn Court •4 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •283 Properties Page 200 of 275 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility issues Page 201 of 275 Why Reconstruct? •Roadway originally constructed with in the 1950’s-1980’s •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) Page 202 of 275 Existing Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Some streets have curb and gutter while others do not •Some properties already have concrete driveway aprons, some do not Page 203 of 275 Existing Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains •Sanitary Sewer - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. - Inflow and infiltration •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing Page 204 of 275 What / Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically, 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey Page 205 of 275 Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences Page 206 of 275 Proposed Improvements – Roadways •Replacement and installation of curb & gutter •Subgrade corrections as needed •New roadbed and asphalt pavement surface Page 207 of 275 Living Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •Minimum roadway design elements •Street Width •Impacts •Cost •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Page 208 of 275 Proposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced / installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy Page 209 of 275 Proposed Improvements - Utilities •Includes partial replacement of watermain •New service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •May include localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Lining of sanitary sewer •Storm sewer upgrades Page 210 of 275 Proposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Installed when feasible and warranted •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website Page 211 of 275 Utility Ownership City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service Page 212 of 275 Utility Ownership •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Page 213 of 275 Proposed Improvements – Ped / Bike •Based on Pedestrian and Bicyclist Master Plan •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts Page 214 of 275 Private Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Fiber optic internet currently being installed •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance Page 215 of 275 Overhead Utility Poles •Resident request about burying overhead utilities •Not required by the City, nor does the City fund this •If pursued, full cost by property owners •Significant cost •Private service connection not included Page 216 of 275 What You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Localized flooding during rainfall •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain Page 217 of 275 What You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in ROW •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Construction equipment stored on streets •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) Page 218 of 275 What You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 7 days to allow driveways to cure Page 219 of 275 What You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be restored with new sod Page 220 of 275 What You Can Expect •We will; •Provide opportunities for input •Keep you informed •Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs Page 221 of 275 City Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •Sanitary sewer •Watermain Page 222 of 275 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •Sidewalks /shared-use paths •Bike lanes •Associated signage and pavement markings •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees Page 223 of 275 Do Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~23% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •~3.2% go to Public Works •Snowplowing •Pothole repairs •Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •In 2022 taxes began paying for a portion of street reconstruction Figures per proposed 2025 Edina Tax Levy (not final) Page 224 of 275 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers portion of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Driveway installation •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings Page 225 of 275 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties REU FactorLand Use ClassScenario 1.0Single-Family ResidentialA 0.5Multi-Family Residential –Apartment/CondosB Page 226 of 275 Project Details – Parklawn Court •4 properties (41.50 REUs) •330’ of road •Full removal and replacement of curb & gutter •Concrete roadway removed and replaced with Bituminous •Water services replacement •Sanitary Lining and local replacement •Storm sewer improvements •Potential sidewalk(s) •Street width still to be determined Page 227 of 275 Project Details – Prospect Knolls A, C, & D •283 properties (231.67 REUs) •3.20 miles of road •Installation and replacement of curb & gutter •Partial watermain and full water services replacement •Sanitary lining and localized repairs •Storm sewer improvements •24’ street width 5’ walk: •Portions of Shannon Drive, Lanham Lane •Kemrich Drive, Fleetwood Drive •Typically 27’ street width remaining streets Page 228 of 275 Proposed Utility Improvements •Install 12” watermain from West 70th Street to Gleason Road •Existing Utility Easement •Replace 6” watermain on Dublin Circle •Replace 6” watermain on Lanham Lane •Upgrade 1.5” watermain in cul-de-sacs to 6” watermain •Install 8” sanitary sewer on 70th Street Page 229 of 275 Pedestrian Facilities Plan •5’ concrete sidewalk •Shannon Drive •Kemrich Drive •Fleetwood Drive •Lanham Lane •Connection to existing Lewis Park path •Sidewalk to be maintained by adjacent property owners Page 230 of 275 Proposed: 24’ road width, one-sided parking, 5’ sidewalk (0-5’ grass boulevard) Existing: 30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – Sidewalk Streets Page 231 of 275 Existing: 26’-30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed: 27’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – No Sidewalk Streets •27’ road width •Reduce street widths by 0-3’ •Two-sided parking to remain •Exceptions •Kerry Road •24’ width •One-sided parking •Village Drive •30’ width Page 232 of 275 Revised Roadway Cost Assessment - Local Sample Assessment During Transition $30,000$20,000$10,000% of Local Roadway Costs Assessed Construction Year $30,000$20,000$10,000100%2020 $23,670- $17,358 $15,780- $11,572 $7,890- $5,78678.90%-57.86%2021-2025 $15,780$10,520$5,26052.60%2026 $14,202-$1,578$9,468-$1,052$4,734-$52647.34%-5.26%2027-2035 $0$0$00%2036 Page 233 of 275 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 234 of 275 Assessments Districts – Prospect Knolls •Disparity in potential benefit •3 Separate Districts Page 235 of 275 Preliminary Assessments – Prospect Knolls & Parklawn Ct *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) SY of Paving per REU Square Yards of Paving # of REUs Estimated Assessment Range per REU* % of Roadway Costs Assessed NeighborhoodYear -------Prospect Knolls A/C/D2026 328.119,25058.67$21,500 -$16,200 52.60%District 1 2026 161.424,692153$10,900 -$8,200 52.60%District 22026 66.01,32120$3,800 -$2,900 52.60%District 32026 29.41,22141.5$2,400-$1,80057.86%Parklawn Court2026 120.935,250291.6$11,500 -$7,500 57.86%Presidents A/B2025 175.230,568174.49$17,100 -$11,900 63.12%Concord B/C 2024 Page 236 of 275 Typical Project Timeline MilestoneDate Engineering studies/estimates providedJuly –September 2025 Public hearingsDecember 2025 Plan preparation and biddingJanuary – March 2026 Construction beginsApril – May 2026 Construction concludesOctober – November 2026 Warranty work2027 Final assessment hearingFall 2027 Page 237 of 275 Assessment Timing MilestoneDate Initial Public HearingsDecember 2025 Project ConstructedSummer 2026 Final Assessment HearingOctober 2027 Assessment Filed with CountyNovember 2027 Assessment on Tax StatementJanuary 2028 Page 238 of 275 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2024 interest rate was 4.69% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 239 of 275 Communication •Regular Mail •All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires •Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers •Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, concrete, temporary inaccessibility) •Better Together Edina – City Website Project Page Page 240 of 275 Better Together Edina •Best way to stay informed •www.bettertogether edina.org •Free, access to periodic updates on project progress and schedules Page 241 of 275 Providing Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •Traffic/pedestrian issues •Street drainage issues •Streetlight upgrades •Public hearing in December 2025 •Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns Page 242 of 275 Questionnaire Results Responses Received to DateNeighborhood 26% (74 / 283)Prospect Knolls 25% (1 / 4)Parklawn Court Page 243 of 275 How To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Review Better Together Edina updates •Ask questions, stay informed Page 244 of 275 Contact Us Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 ADitzler@edinamn.gov Page 245 of 275 Questions? •Ask questions on Better Together Edina Q&A page •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/parklawn-court •Call or email Page 246 of 275 Thank you for your time! Page 247 of 275 APPENDIX J Resident Questionnaires Page 248 of 275 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 24 August 2025 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey Better Together Edina Project: Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction VISITORS 10 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Page 249 of 275 Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 25, 2025 03:32:19 am Last Seen:Jul 25, 2025 10:24:55 am Q1.Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, backyard drain, nuisance sump pump, etc. No Q2.Please comment on the location and types of problems you have. not answered Q3.How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? Not Concerned Q4.If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. not answered Q5.How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? Not Concerned Q6.If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. not answered Q7.How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Excludes speed and traffic volumes. Examples of poor motorist behavior include rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively) Not Concerned Q8.If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. not answered Q9.In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: not answered Q10.Do you feel any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? No Q11.Which intersection do you feel is unsafe? not answered Q12.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) not answered Q13.In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: not answered Page 250 of 275 Q14.How frequently do you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Never Q15.If you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q16.If you don't walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. This is already a very safe area, and if I had any desire to get out of my apartment I would feel comfortable doing so Q17.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Never Q18.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q19.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q20.How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Never Q21.How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Rarely (less than once per month) Q22.How satisfied are you with the availability of on- street parking in your neighborhood? Satisfied Q23.Any additional comments about parking? not answered Q24.Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. There are no issues with the Parklawn CT area Q25.Do you support the installation of a sidewalk on: Neither side Q26.Please describe any specific concerns or support you have regarding sidewalks on your street. not answered Q27.How many vehicles are typically parked on Parklawn Ct (daily)? 3 vehicles Q28.How often do you or your household rely on on- street parking? Never Page 251 of 275 Q29.Do you have off-street parking available (e.g., parking lot, garage)? Yes Q30.If on-street parking were reduced or restricted due to new sidewalk installation, how would that impact you? Significant impact Q31.Please elaborate if you have specific concerns regarding parking. The street parking currently allows just enough room to move through safely. Installing even just 1 sidewalk would make the street too narrow. Q32.What is your address?4435 Parklawn CT, Edina, MN 55435 Page 252 of 275 APPENDIX K Correspondence from Residents Page 253 of 275 APPENDIX L Proposed Typical Sections Page 254 of 275 APPENDIX M Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 255 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.3 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project Action Requested: Review and comment on the proposed roadway improvements. Information/Background: See attached supporting materials. Supporting Documentation: 1. Draft Layout - W 72nd St 2. South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements Map Page 256 of 275 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\24X136203000\CAD\C3D\136203_CBASE_N2_CENTER_MEDIAN 2.dwg 10/15/2025 9:52:25 AMR W 72nd Street City of Edina October 2025 FEETSCALE 0 15 30 HORZ. R FEETSCALE 0 15 30 HORZ. R CORNELIA DRGLOUCHESTER AVEHEATHERTON TRAIL5'8'5'8'12'4.16'5'8'INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 80 LF RETAINING WALL DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT LIMITS EXTEND BEYOND ROW12'4'12'4.16'12'4'12'4.16'12'4'Page 257 of 275 H:\EDINA_CI_MN\24X136203000\CAD\C3D\136203_CBASE_N2_CENTER_MEDIAN 2.dwg 10/15/2025 9:52:27 AMR W 72nd Street City of Edina October 2025 FEETSCALE 0 15 30 HORZ. R FEETSCALE 0 15 30 HORZ. R BRISTOL BLVDLYMAR LNFRANCE AVE S5'8'14'14'8'5'8'5'8'REMOVE EXISTING BOULDER WALL AND FENCE. INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 95 LF RETAINING WALL DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT LIMITS EXTEND BEYOND ROW12'4.16'12'4'12'12'4'COORDINATE ACCESS WITH DEVELOPER Page 258 of 275 17 17 100 100 Lake EdinaLake Edina ParkArneson Acres ParkCornelia School Fred RichardsPark ParkArneson Acres ParkCornelia School Fred RichardsPark Cornelia ElementarySchool Cornelia ElementarySchool Aspasia Lane Oaklawn AvenueDunham Drive Parklawn Avenue Gilford Drive Andover Road Wooddale AvenueHibiscus Avenue Hibiscus Avenue Kellogg AveGlouchester AvenueW 70th Street Ellsworth Drive Poppy Lan eTrillium Lane Claremore Drive Larkspur Lane W 72nd Street Se d um L a n e Kellogg AvenueMonardo LaneBelvidere Lane Fondell Drive Mavelle Drive Cornelia DriveCornelia DriveW Shore DriveW Shore DriveMetro BoulevardFrance Avenue SAspasia Lane Oaklawn AvenueDunham Drive Parklawn Avenue Gilford Drive Andover Road Wooddale AvenueHibiscus Avenue Hibiscus Avenue Kellogg AveGlouchester AvenueW 70th Street Ellsworth Drive Poppy Lan eTrillium Lane Claremore Drive Larkspur Lane W 72nd Street Se d um L a n e Kellogg AvenueMonardo LaneBelvidere Lane Fondell Drive Mavelle Drive Cornelia DriveCornelia DriveW Shore DriveW Shore DriveMetro BoulevardFrance Avenue SCORNELIA SOUTH PARKLAWN LAKE EDINA CORNELIA SOUTH PARKLAWN LAKE EDINA Key Considerations • Right-of-way encroachments (walls, fences) • Overhead utility lines / poles • Maintaining access • Mature trees • Groundwater • Constructability of deep sewer main • Lateral connections to deep sewer main Project Area - Segment 1: 2030 Construction* Project Area - Segment 2: 2028 Construction* Project Area - Segment 3: 2026 Construction* Bike Path Neighborhood Boundaries Walking Path * Anticipated construction year Lift station 6 South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements Page 259 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.4 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 Action Requested: Review and comment on the staff report. Information/Background: The Traffic Safety Committee recommends action on two items, no action on four items and further study on one item. See attached staff report. Supporting Documentation: 1. Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 Page 260 of 275 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 1. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Transportation Planner, Engineering Director, Assistant City Planner and Traffic Safety Specialist were in attendance for this meeting. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the October 22 meeting. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Request for pedestrian safety improvements along Ridgeview Dr Staff recommends adding a striped parking lane on Ridgeview Dr between the railroad tracks and W 66th St. This work will be performed in Spring 2026. Date: October 23, 2025 To: Transportation Commission From: Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Subject: Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 Action Requested: Review and comment on staff recommendations. Description Requester and children feel unsafe when on sidewalk with vehicle volumes and speeds on Ridgeview. AADT 5,197 (2024) 85% Speed N/A Crashes One at Ridgeview and Valley Ln. 2016 Heavy snow conditions. Street Width 35’ – one-sided parking on west side. Northbound driving lane is 14’ Southbound driving (& parking) lane is 21’ Bike/Ped Facilities Sidewalk on west side of Ridgeview Previous Work Last overlay in 2004 Last seal coat in 2008 Future Work No plans in 5-year CIP Ridgeview Dr Page 261 of 275 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 A2. Request for speed limit signs on W 74th St Staff recommends adding a gateway speed limit sign on Bush Lake Rd north of W 78th St. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1: Request to lower speed limit on Interlachen Blvd to 25 mph Staff recommends no action. Staff is considering a future reconstruction of Interlachen Blvd between Blake Rd and Mirror Lakes Dr that would improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities and may provide opportunities for traffic calming treatments. Description Edina Police Sergeant noticed increased speeds on W 74th and requested a speed limit sign. ADT 4,240 (2025) 2,985 (2021) 85% Speed 32.8 mph (2025) 32.7 mph (2021) Crashes One rear-end of a parked truck in front of Edina Public Works Previous Work W 74th lowered to 25 mph speed limit (from 30 mph) in 2022. Unique Circumstances W 74th has one of highest volumes in Edina not classified as Municipal State-Aid Street Bike/Ped Facilities Sidewalk on south side of W 74th Description Requester states pedestrians and cyclists would benefit from a lower speed limit. AADT 7,260 (2024) 85% Speed 38.3 mph (2015) Crashes 17 (four rear-ends, seven angle. Only one during winter months) Previous Work Interlachen was overlaid in 2019. Unique Circumstances Two permanent dynamic speed display signs west of Oxford Ave. Bike/Ped Facilities Sidewalk on south side from Mirror Lakes to Vernon Ave. Standard bike lanes present. A proposed shared use path is planned between Blake Rd and Mirror Lakes Dr. W 74th St Interlachen Blvd Page 262 of 275 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 B2: Request for speed limit signs on Long Brake Trl Staff recommends no action. B3: Sight line complaints at W 44th St and North Ave Staff recommends no action. B4: Sight line complaints at 7401 Bush Lake Rd Staff recommends no action. The property owner may consider signing the northern driveway as “exit only" and the southern driveway as “enter only” to minimize sight line impacts. Description Resident complained of vehicles passing them on the left when turning onto street. ADT N/A 85% Speed N/A Crashes None reported in past 10 years. Previous Work This Dewey Hill neighborhood was overlaid in 2015 Bike/Ped Facilities None between Delaney and Gleason Rd. Description Resident is requesting a tree be cut down to improve sight lines looking west over Minnehaha Creek at W 44th St and North Ave. AADT 3,655 – W 44th St (2024) Crashes None reported in past 10 years. Unique Circumstances Bridge guard rail also impacts sight lines. Previous Work W 44th reconstructed in 2011 North Ave was overlaid in 2020 Future Work W 44th Overlay planned for 2028 Description Guests exiting driveway of 7401 Bush Lake have little visibility when parking is used adjacent to property. AADT 5,134 (2023) Crashes Crash reported of vehicle exiting driveway in April 2022. Unique Circumstances Parking restrictions removed in 2019 to accommodate businesses. Previous Work Bush Lake was overlaid in 2018 Discussion Any other options to improve sight lines besides adding parking signage? Long Brake Trl W 44th St looking west from North Ave over Minnehaha Creek 7401 Bush Lake Rd Page 263 of 275 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study C1. Request to remove No Outlet signs in Country Club neighborhood Staff recommends researching alternative signage for this area and engaging the adjacent property owners about possible parking restrictions. Section D: Other traffic safety items D1. Two requests for stop controls at 3-way intersections; Chowen Ave and Chowen Curve along with Paiute Pass and Sally Ln. These intersections are uncontrolled with adequate visibility for stopping distances, low volumes and no crash history. Stop controls do not meet warrants. D2. A homeowner on Lake Ridge Rd and Blake Rd is requesting a guardrail to be installed adjacent to their property as it’s along a curve. The homeowner reported a vehicle ran off road this past into their property. This portion of Blake was reconstructed in 2023 and a guardrail did not meet state design requirements, no action recommended by staff. D3. A resident on the 5600 block of Bernard Pl requested staff remove a road closed sign following no work taking place for weeks. The private contractor managing the project was notified and the sign was removed. D4. A reported crash involving a 12 year-old at W 58th and Xerxes. Residents request the 2-way stop be switched to an all-way stop. Hennepin County reviewed this intersection and is recommending no changes due to crash history and vehicle volumes. D5. A complaint of visibility at the southwest corner of York Ave and W 66th St. Staff contacted the maintenance group in charge of this area and the issue was resolved. Description Resident noticed two No Outlet signs – Sunnyside Rd & Browndale Ave and at W 44th St and Mackey Ave, where outlets are available. ADT N/A – 36 homes are within impacted neighborhood. Crashes One rear-end crash in 2017 due to icy roads. Street Width 17’ face to face of curb Unique Circumstances Parking is restricted only on the south side of Sunnyside. Recommendation Remove No Outlet signs and install parking restrictions on north side of Sunnyside for EMS access. No Outlet signs in Country Club neighborhood Page 264 of 275 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 D6. Many complaints received during new closures around the Vernon Ave bridge project. Staff from many departments are requesting commuters use extra caution and be patient until the completion of the project. D7. A submission was received for a dead animal along the 5300 block of Halifax Ave. Proper staff was notified of the submission. D8. A request for a permanent speed display sign for traffic on Dewey Hill Rd. Staff will review Dewey Hill once a policy for a speed display sign is adopted. D9. A resident who lives adjacent to Woodland Rd West and Concord Ave S requested all-way stop controls at the intersection. Stop controls are only warranted for westbound vehicles and no other warrants along Concord Ave are met. The proximity to Concord and Southview Ln could cause additional congestion and lack of stopping properly. D10. A complaint was made of a traffic signal not operating properly at W 77th St and Normandale Rd, east of HWY 100. MnDOT fixed the issue. D11. A complaint of a pedestrian cross button not working at W 65th St and France Ave. Hennepin County staff was notified and fixed the issue. D12. A resident was hit in a crosswalk in the southwest corner of W 51st St at France Ave and is requesting crossing safety improvements. Hennepin County is working with City staff with an upcoming project along France Ave. Safety improvements are planned. D13. A request for temporary all-way stop controls at W 44th St and Brookside Ave during the final closure of ramps during the Vernon Ave bridge closure. Staff is monitoring possible detours to see if changes are needed. The intersection will remain one-way stop controlled for the time being. D14. A request for a traffic mirror at a residential driveway along Valley View Rd, west of Gleason. Edina does not utilize mirrors for sight lines. The resident was encouraged to trim vegetation to improve visibility. D15. A bicyclist requested improved bike lanes on Wooddale Ave between Valley View Rd and W 50th St. Staff will consider improvements with an anticipated 2026 overlay project. D16. Many complaints received regarding tenants at the new Eddi residence parking on Computer Ave. Property management was notified of City parking policies and parking restrictions were reinstalled on the west side of Computer following the development project. Page 265 of 275 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Section E: Items recommended for police enforcement E1. A complaint was made of drivers speeding and not stopping for pedestrians on Market St and requested enforcement. The EPD was notified of the request. E2. A complaint of vehicles parking illegally on W 72nd St, west of France Ave. Edina Police was notified and added the area to their patrol list for enforcement. E3. A resident complained of minor children not wearing proper helmet and following safety measures on an all-terrain vehicle along Madison Ave. The EPD was notified of the instance. E4. Complaints of vehicles consistently exceeding the speed limit on W 70th St and W 78th St. EPD was notified for enforcement. Page 266 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.5 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Other Department: Engineering Item Title: SEMAP Update Action Requested: None. Information/Background: Staff will provide an update on the development of the City's Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan. Supporting Documentation: None Page 267 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.6 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Initiative #5: City Code Sec. 26-282 Action Requested: Review and comment on draft report. Information/Background: As part of the 2025 Work Plan, the Commission reviewed Edina City Code Section 26 Chapter X. Bicycles and developed recommendations. See attached draft report. Supporting Documentation: 1. Report: Recommendation to Amend City Code Sec. 26-282 Page 268 of 275 City of Edina – Transportation Commission To: Edina City Council From: Edina Transportation Commission Date: October 6, 2025 Subject: Recommendation to Amend Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 to Support Safe, Responsible E-Bike Use Work Plan Reference: ETC 2025 Work Plan Item 5 Executive Summary The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) recommends revising Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 to remove the prohibition against operating electric-assisted bicycles (e-bikes) on sidewalks. The current restriction unintentionally creates safety risks by forcing riders onto streets without protected facilities and is inconsistent with the approach taken by neighboring cities. The ETC further recommends reinforcing and publicizing existing safety standards for sidewalk riding already codified in Sec. 26-283, ensuring that pedestrians maintain the right-of-way and that riders operate responsibly and at low speed. Background At its May 6, 2025 meeting, City Council approved by consent an amendment to Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 adding the following sentence: 'No person may operate an electric-assisted bicycle, as defined in this Chapter, on a sidewalk.' This language applies broadly to all classes of e-bikes and all locations within the city, regardless of rider behavior, surrounding land use, or the availability of safe bike infrastructure. Situation Summary The ETC believes this prohibition unintentionally increases safety risks for both cyclists and drivers by forcing riders—particularly youth, seniors, and less experienced e-bike users—onto busy streets that lack protected or connected bike lanes. Edina’s current biking network is incomplete and lacks continuous protected routes connecting key destinations. Until substantial improvements are made, sidewalks remain the only safe refuge for slower or cautious riders in many parts of the city. Restricting sidewalk access also discourages e-bike adoption —a key strategy supporting Edina’s Climate Action Plan and Vision Edina goals for sustainable, low- carbon mobility. Neighboring communities including Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Minneapolis permit e- bikes on sidewalks with safety limitations, offering regional consistency for riders who travel across municipal boundaries. It is also important to note that concerns about pedestrian safety from bikes or e-bikes on sidewalks are not supported by data. According to state records, the last known fatal incident involving a pedestrian struck by a bicyclist in Minnesota occurred in 1972—more than 50 years ago. In contrast, 41 people have been killed by cars while biking in Minnesota in the most recent five-year period where data is readily available (2018–2022). This data underscores that the far greater public safety risk comes from vehicle interactions, not from bicycles or e-bikes sharing space with pedestrians at low speeds. Recommendations 1 Amend Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 to delete the sentence: 'No person may operate an electric-assisted bicycle, as defined in this Chapter, on a sidewalk.' 2 Reaffirm and promote the safety provisions already contained in Sec. 26-283 governing bicycle Page 269 of 275 operation on sidewalks, emphasizing pedestrian right-of-way, reasonable speed (not exceeding 10 mph), slowing to walking pace near pedestrians, driveways, and intersections, and avoiding sidewalks adjacent to building entrances or where posted restrictions apply. Electric-assisted bike riders can be held by law enforcement to the same safety standards as conventional bike riders, including the caveat that pedestrians on sidewalks have the right of way. 3 Direct staff to update public materials (website, signage, and education programs) to clearly communicate these safety requirements and expectations for responsible e-bike use. 4 Consider implementing a one-year pilot period allowing e-bike use on sidewalks citywide, with a follow-up safety and compliance evaluation presented to City Council in 2026. Conclusion Allowing responsible e-bike use on sidewalks—within clear, enforceable safety limits—will enhance safety for both cyclists and motorists, support Edina’s climate and mobility goals, and align Edina’s policies with those of neighboring communities for a consistent regional approach. The ETC respectfully requests City Council’s consideration and approval of this recommendation. Thank you Page 270 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.7 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Other Department: Engineering Item Title: 2025 Work Plan Updates Action Requested: None. Information/Background: Commissioners will provide updates on the status of current work plan initiatives (unless an item is elsewhere on the current agenda). See attached work plan progress report. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2025 Work Plan Progress Report Page 271 of 275 Page 272 of 275 Page 273 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.8 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Other Department: Engineering Item Title: 2026/2027 Work Plan Update Action Requested: None. Information/Background: Staff will provide an update on the 2026/2027 work plan development process. Supporting Documentation: None Page 274 of 275 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: October 23, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 7.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Other Department: Engineering Item Title: Transportation Projects Update Action Requested: None. Information/Background: Staff will provide a brief update on current and upcoming transportation projects in and around Edina. Supporting Documentation: None Page 275 of 275