Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-11-20 ETC Packet Meeting location: Edina City Hall Community Room 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda Thursday, November 20, 2025 6:00 PM [IGNORE_INDENT] Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Initiative #5 Draft Report 6.2. Initiative #3 Draft Report 6.3. Traffic Safety Report of October 30, 2025 6.4. 2025 Work Plan Updates 7. Staff Comments Page 1 of 25 7.1. December 18 Meeting Discussion 8. Chair and Member Comments 9. Adjournment Page 2 of 25 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: November 20, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 4.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Minutes Department: Engineering Item Title: Minutes Action Requested: Approve the minutes of the Transportation Commission's October 23 regular meeting. Information/Background: See attached draft minutes. Supporting Documentation: 1. Draft Minutes, Oct. 23, 2025 Page 3 of 25 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room October 23, 2025 1. Call to Order Vice Chair Brown called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Bildsten, Brown, Olson, White Late: Commissioner Lassig Absent: Commissioners Lewis, Rosen, Trueger, Wright, Bracken Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni, 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the September 18, 2025 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. 5. Community Comment Taylor Bruhschwein, 5744 Ewing Ave, commented on the Wooddale Ave bike lane updates between 50th St and Valley View Rd noted in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and asked the Commission to review the proposed project. Bruhschwein noted that the project has a good chance to decrease motor vehicle trips on Wooddale Ave and connect to the proposed Twin Loops facility. The corridor is close to Pamela Park, Wooddale Park, Utley Park, four schools and commercial destinations. Bruhschwein noted that the current infrastructure does not feel safe and felt that demand is there to bike if improvements were to be made. Bruhschwein also asked the Commission to be bold when reviewing the proposed reconstruction projects tonight. Commissioner Lassig arrived at 6:08. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Prospect Knolls A/C/D Reconstruction Project Senior Project Engineer Ben Jore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included:  Suggest including the intersection of 70th St and Antrim Rd and to consider extending the westbound bike lane to the intersection. Page 4 of 25 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date:  Consider extending the sidewalk one more block north on Shannon Dr to Lee Valley to collect more walkshed.  Concerned about resident opposition at the 11th hour like the Concord reconstruction project last year.  Suggest referencing the Quality of Life Survey results at the public hearing to show support for sidewalks. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented. Motion failed for lack of a second. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented and to recommend additional analysis of the 70th St and Antrim Rd intersection for a potential demonstration project. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.2. Parklawn Court Reconstruction Project Graduate Engineer Chris Moore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included:  Appreciate the critical thought put into the recommendations. This sidewalk connection is a small but important link.  Suggest that lack of response from adjacent properties owners/tenants might reflect support for the project. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Olson to endorse the proposed improvements for the Parklawn Court reconstruction project as presented. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.3. South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project Staff Liaison Scipioni presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included:  The proposed shared-use path would be great for providing access to the future France Avenue pedestrian crossing.  Suggest considering another midblock median further west along the corridor.  Suggest constructing the proposed Wooddale Ave bike boulevard through the South Cornelia neighborhood as part of this project.  The multi-year project will be disruptive to the residents, but it will provide a good opportunity for new multi-modal facilities. 6.4. Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 The Commission reviewed and commented on the staff report. Page 5 of 25 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Commissioner White left at 7:32. 6.5. SEMAP Update Staff Liaison Scipioni presented an update on the status of the Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan. 6.6. Initiative #5 City Code Sec. 26-282 The Commission reviewed and commented on the draft report. 6.7. 2025 Work Plan Updates 1. Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan Participation – Commission received an update at tonight’s meeting. Staff is planning to meet with Hennepin County’s staff to discuss their safety action plan. 2. Commission-Led Events – Committee and staff participated in Concord Elementary’s bike/walk to school day on October 8. 3. Review of City Policies/Ordinances – Committee is working on draft report. 4. City Code Update – No update. 5. City Code Regarding Bicycles – Committee has draft report, will review with Commission at next meeting. 7. Staff Comments – Received. 7.1. Transportation Projects Update Staff provided an update on current and upcoming transportation projects in and around Edina. 7.2. 2025 Meeting Dates The Commission’s next regular meeting is Thursday, November 20. 8. Chair and Member Comments – Received. 9. Adjournment Vice Chair Brown adjourned the meeting at 8:23. Page 6 of 25 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 SEAT NAME 1 Wright, Grant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% 2 VACANT 3 Bildsten, Roger 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 5 Rosen, Adam 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 7 Olson, Bethany 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 8 White, Joan 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 9 VACANT 10 Lassig, Augie (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 11 Bracken, Logan (s) 1 1 50% Page 7 of 25 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: November 20, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Initiative #5 Draft Report Action Requested: Approve the draft report. Information/Background: As part of their 2025 work plan, the Commission reviewed and recommended changes to Edina City Code Chapter 26 Article X. Bicycles, considering secondary effects on City plans and resident experience. See attached draft report. Supporting Documentation: 1. Draft Report: Initiative #5 Page 8 of 25 City of Edina – Transportation Commission To: Edina City Council From: Edina Transportation Commission Date: October 6, 2025 Subject: Recommendation to Amend Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 to Support Safe, Responsible E-Bike Use Work Plan Reference: ETC 2025 Work Plan Item 5 Executive Summary The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) recommends revising Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 to remove the prohibition against operating electric-assisted bicycles (e-bikes) on sidewalks. The current restriction unintentionally creates safety risks by forcing riders onto streets without protected facilities and is inconsistent with the approach taken by neighboring cities. The ETC further recommends reinforcing and publicizing existing safety standards for sidewalk riding already codified in Sec. 26-283, ensuring that pedestrians maintain the right-of-way and that riders operate responsibly and at low speed. Background At its May 6, 2025 meeting, City Council approved by consent an amendment to Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 adding the following sentence: 'No person may operate an electric-assisted bicycle, as defined in this Chapter, on a sidewalk.' This language applies broadly to all classes of e-bikes and all locations within the city, regardless of rider behavior, surrounding land use, or the availability of safe bike infrastructure. Situation Summary The ETC believes this prohibition unintentionally increases safety risks for both cyclists and drivers by forcing riders—particularly youth, seniors, and less experienced e-bike users—onto busy streets that lack protected or connected bike lanes. Edina’s current biking network is incomplete and lacks continuous protected routes connecting key destinations. Until substantial improvements are made, sidewalks remain the only safe refuge for slower or cautious riders in many parts of the city. Restricting sidewalk access also discourages e-bike adoption —a key strategy supporting Edina’s Climate Action Plan and Vision Edina goals for sustainable, low- carbon mobility. Neighboring communities including Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Minneapolis permit e- bikes on sidewalks with safety limitations, offering regional consistency for riders who travel across municipal boundaries. It is also important to note that concerns about pedestrian safety from bikes or e-bikes on sidewalks are not supported by data. According to state records, the last known fatal incident involving a pedestrian struck by a bicyclist in Minnesota occurred in 1972—more than 50 years ago. In contrast, 41 people have been killed by cars while biking in Minnesota in the most recent five-year period where data is readily available (2018–2022). This data underscores that the far greater public safety risk comes from vehicle interactions, not from bicycles or e-bikes sharing space with pedestrians at low speeds. Recommendations 1 Amend Edina City Code Sec. 26-282 to delete the sentence: 'No person may operate an electric-assisted bicycle, as defined in this Chapter, on a sidewalk.' 2 Reaffirm and promote the safety provisions already contained in Sec. 26-283 governing bicycle Page 9 of 25 operation on sidewalks, emphasizing pedestrian right-of-way, reasonable speed (not exceeding 10 mph), slowing to walking pace near pedestrians, driveways, and intersections, and avoiding sidewalks adjacent to building entrances or where posted restrictions apply. Electric-assisted bike riders can be held by law enforcement to the same safety standards as conventional bike riders, including the caveat that pedestrians on sidewalks have the right of way. 3 Direct staff to update public materials (website, signage, and education programs) to clearly communicate these safety requirements and expectations for responsible e-bike use. 4 Consider implementing a one-year pilot period allowing e-bike use on sidewalks citywide, with a follow-up safety and compliance evaluation presented to City Council in 2026. Conclusion Allowing responsible e-bike use on sidewalks—within clear, enforceable safety limits—will enhance safety for both cyclists and motorists, support Edina’s climate and mobility goals, and align Edina’s policies with those of neighboring communities for a consistent regional approach. The ETC respectfully requests City Council’s consideration and approval of this recommendation. Thank you Page 10 of 25 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: November 20, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.2 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Initiative #3 Draft Report Action Requested: Approve the draft report. Information/Background: As part of their 2025 work plan, the Commission studied how other cities have used policies or ordinances to require inclusion of walking and biking infrastructure as part of roadway reconstruction or rehabilitation projects. See attached draft report. Supporting Documentation: 1. Initiative #3 Draft Report Page 11 of 25 To: Edina City Council From: Edina Transportation Commission Date: November 11, 2025 Subject: Review of City Policies/Ordinances Requiring Walking and Biking Improvements Work Plan Reference: ETC 2025 Work Plan Item 3 Recommendation Council direction for staff to write an ordinance with language that accomplishes the following and adopted no later than December 31, 2026. 1. Require inclusion of all infrastructure recommended in Edina’s adopted Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2018) per the proposed pedestrian and bicycle networks. 2. Modify the adopted bicycle network using professional judgement and current industry best practices to upgrade proposed bicycle infrastructure off-street or on-street and physically protected. 3. Add new pedestrian or bicycle connections in addition to the master plan’s pedestrian and bicycle networks using professional judgement on a case by case basis. Background The City of Edina has a growing network of infrastructure for walking, rolling, and biking that supports a variety of the city’s adopted planning efforts including, but not limited to, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2018), Climate Action Plan (2021), and Comprehensive Plan (2018). Such improvements for people of all ages and abilities to walk, roll, and bike in their community is also broadly supported by Edina residents. This is illustrated in two key ways that represent the voices of residents.: 1. The 2025 Quality of Life Survey results include several questions that demonstrate strong support for walking and biking infrastructure including, but not limited to, the nearly 70% of residents that support reducing transportation emissions by building sidewalks, bike lanes, etc. A call to action is demonstrated by the minor reduction since 2021 in residents that believe the ease of walking and biking in Edina is excellent or good. 2. An increasing number of pedestrian safety requests submitted to the city’s traffic safety request system. It is now the number one request representing nearly a quarter of all submittals. Traffic calming requests have also been increasing which pedestrian and bicycle improvements can support. Page 12 of 25 Though there is widespread support for such infrastructure, individual property owners have reduced the city’s ability in building out the planned walking and biking network within public right-of-way. The public right-of-way is defined by the city as: “The City’s easement allows City staff to monitor and manage the ROW, ensure safe vehicle and pedestrian travel, and use the right-of-way for snow storage and public infrastructure.” Using the public right-of-way to improve the lives of all Edina residents is critically important. At times, such control to improve the broader public good is hindered by a very small number of voices. To provide a balance to this ongoing conversation, remove emotion from projects that will last a century, and allow staff to effectively implement Edina’s adopted planning documents and achieve their goals, we believe that an ordinance is needed. Nationwide Research & Applicable Examples Research of nationwide examples was completed both specifically for pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, as well as other potential precedents for infrastructure to further the broader public good. Cambridge, MA & Somerville, MA - Ordinances Requiring Bike Infrastructure In 2019, Cambridge, MA, passed the Cycling Safety Ordinance, becoming the first city in the country to mandate the inclusion of separated bike lanes whenever streets are rebuilt if such lanes are part of the city’s bicycle master plan. In 2024, Somerville, MA passed the Safe Streets Ordinance, an ordinance that largely mirrors Cambridge’s with additional language requiring other physical improvements such as sidewalk, traffic calming, etc., to implement the city’s Vision Zero Action Plan and comply with ADA requirements. Both plans require the inclusion of bicycle infrastructure within any street project that has such infrastructure identified by the city’s Page 13 of 25 adopted plans. Due to Cambridge’s ordinance, the city is on track to have built 25 miles of bicycle infrastructure by the November 2026 deadline. As of 2024, the city had about 69 miles of streets with bike infrastructure which represents nearly 40 percent of the city’s 180 miles of roadways under their jurisdiction (this would equate to about 88 miles of Edina’s 230 miles of city-owned streets). Greensboro, NC - Ordinance Requiring Sidewalk The Greensboro Land Development Ordinance, Section 30-9-10.2 Required Locations, mandates sidewalk construction in various scenarios: ● Sidewalks are required along both sides of new and existing major and minor thoroughfare streets. ● Sidewalks are required along both sides of all new and existing streets in Traditional Neighborhood Developments. ● Sidewalks are required along at least one side of new and existing collector streets and local streets, with conditions that may require sidewalks on both sides in some cases. ● Exemptions may exist for certain types of streets like short cul-de-sacs or those in industrial areas, subject to review by the Transportation Director. Los Angeles, CA - Ordinance Requiring Walking, Biking, and Transit Improvements Measure HLA, the Healthy Streets L.A. initiative, became law in 2025 and requires that, during any street repaving, the city implement bus, bike, and walk improvements approved in the city's Mobility Plan 2035. The plan includes networks of new bus lanes, bicycle lanes, and pedestrian improvements. It was approved in 2024 by two-thirds of city voters and was created in response to a lack of progress in implementing Los Angeles' 2015 street safety plan and high rates of traffic fatalities, especially for pedestrians and cyclists. The measure mandates the city to redesign hundreds of miles of streets to make them safer for pedestrians and cyclists by including mandatory features like sidewalk and bike lanes during all street improvements. Seattle, WA - Transportation Levy Funding Maintenance and Modernization of City Transportation Infrastructure The 2024 Transportation Levy approved by voters will provide $1.55 billion over 8 years to build sidewalks, pave streets, repair bridges, and improve transit connections. The levy funding focuses on 11 program areas including: school and neighborhood safety, transit corridors and connections, pedestrian safety, bicyclist safety, climate and resiliency, and more. The passage of the levy creates both the funding mechanism and a mandate from residents to implement transportation improvements with intentionality and transparency. Page 14 of 25 Minneapolis, MN - Ordinance Protecting/Prioritizing Tree Canopy Policy 14 of Minneapolis 2040, the city’s Comprehensive Plan, focuses on tree canopy and urban forest throughout Minneapolis. This policy is supported through the Tree Preservation Ordinance, which is designed to: - protect trees during and after construction - replace lost/diseased trees - Utilize public property including boulevards to promote urban tree canopy - foster opportunities for tree canopy on privately owned property The combination of the comprehensive plan with a specific ordinance supports implementation. Page 15 of 25 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: November 20, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.3 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Report and Recommendation Department: Engineering Item Title: Traffic Safety Report of October 30, 2025 Action Requested: Review and comment on the staff report. Information/Background: The Traffic Safety Committee recommends action on three items, no action on two items and further study on one item. See attached staff report. Supporting Documentation: 1. Traffic Safety Report of October 30, 2025 Page 16 of 25 Staff Report Staff Report Date: 11/20/2025 To: Transportation Commission From: Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Subject: Traffic Safety Report October 30, 2025 Action Requested: Review and comment on staff recommendations. Information/Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 30. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Transportation Planner, Engineering Director and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the November 4 meeting. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Request to change No Outlet signs in Country Club neighborhood Staff recommends replacing the ‘No Outlet’ signs with more appropriate ‘Street Narrows’ signs. Description Resident noticed two No Outlet signs – Sunnyside Rd & Browndale Ave and at W 44th St and Mackey Ave, where outlets are available. ADT N/A – 36 homes are within impacted neighborhood. Crashes One rear-end crash in 2017 due to icy roads. Street Width 17’ face to face of curb Unique Circumstances Parking is restricted only on the south side of Sunnyside. No Outlet signs in Country Club neighborhood Page 17 of 25 Memo A2. Review left turn lane usage for WB W 76th St at Edinborough Way Description Request for dedicated EB left turn lane into 7500 York AADT 12,000 85% Speed N/A Crashes Three since 2017, all WB vehicles have been running red lights causing angle crash. Previous Work 2021 Overlay Unique Circumstances January 2025- 618 WB left turns Peak 15 minutes had 42 turns from 8:45-9 AM. Longest cue in left turn was 6 vehicles using 120’ Lane Markings Left turn lane measures 165’ Staff recommends shortening westbound left turn lane approaching Edinborough Way to allow a dedicated eastbound turn lane to enter 7500 York Ave. A3. Request to change lane designations for eastbound W 58th St at Xerxes Ave Description Commuter raised claims of long cuing EB W 58th at Xerxes due to designated left only and thru/right turn designations. Previous work W 58th was reconstructed in 2020. A consultant recommended a designated right turn lane with 200’ storage. Staff recommends changing eastbound W 58th St lane designation to left/thru and right only to improve cuing concerns. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request to increase crosswalk facilities at W 54th St and Brookview Ave Description Requestor is concerned with crossing safety and is requesting RRFBs to raise awareness. AADT 2,211 (2024) 85% Speed 31.2 MPH (2024) Crashes One 90-degree property damage only. Previous Work W 54th reconstructed in 2015. Bike/Ped Crosses 231 crosses in one day. Exceed 20 crosses in six hours Peak of 31 crosses 4:30-5:30 PM. Bike/Ped Facilities Crosswalk installed in 2021. Staff recommends no action. Current treatments meet City policy. EB W 58th St at Xerxes Ave - July 2019 Left Thru Right Total 164 364 814 Peak 4:45-5:45 PM 23 96 113 W 54th St at Brookview Ave Cued vehicles in left turn lane for SB Edinborough Way Eastbound W 58th St at Xerxes Ave Page 18 of 25 Memo B2. Review driveway usage at 4700 and 4660 W 77th St Description Following development of The Fred (4660 W 77th), two private driveways are 16’ apart. AADT 14,732 (2024) Driveway Usage The Fred: 380 right turns and 214 left turns (80 right turns from 7:30-8:30 AM) 4700: DATA STILL BEING ANALYZED Crashes A sideswipe reported two EB vehicles. One vehicle illegally passed in center turn lane, before hitting other vehicle. Future Work Anticipated 2026 overlay Miscellaneous W 77th is 5 lanes measuring approximately 59’ wide. Metro Transit Service 540 stops near location. Bike/Ped Facilities Sidewalk south side of W 77th Sidewalk on north side of W 77th, extending east from driveways. Staff recommends no changes. Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study C1. Review opportunity for crosswalk over Interlachen Blvd at Interlachen Country Club Description Interlachen Blvd is anticipated for reconstruction in 2027 with proposed sidewalk on the south side. ADT 5,861 85% Speed 37 MPH Crashes One- WB vehicle entering ICC rear-ended Previous Work Blake-Interlachen round-about reconstructed in 2023. Unique Circumstances Interlachen has a permanent speed display sign near Oxford Ave Bike/Ped Facilities Interlachen has standard bike lanes. Sidewalk on south side from Mirror Lakes to Blake Rd and approximately 1/6 mile west of ICC Staff recommends conducting a traffic study in spring of 2026. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. Residents in the South Cornelia neighborhood requested a speed limit sign on W 72nd St, west of France Ave. A speed limit sign is present, added signage is unnecessary. D2. A crosswalk was re-installed by Public Works after a contractor was unable to following a 2023 street reconstruction project in the Morningside neighborhood. W 77th St east of Computer Ave Interlachen Blvd between Interlachen Country Club and Blake Rd Page 19 of 25 Memo D3. After a tree fell in the landscaping median in Wooddale Ln, staff reviewed feedback to keep the landscaping median with added parking restrictions or remove the median to allow adequate turning radii for trucks. Neighbors requesting parking restrictions to keep the landscaping median. D4. A commuter requested traffic signals at W 77th St and One Disc Drive. Traffic signals do not meet warrant as One Disc is a private driveway with no crash history. D5. A repeat request to improve intersection controls at the all-way stop at Benton Ave and Tracy Ave. The requestor was notified this has been reviewed by staff on three occasions in the past year. In street crosswalk markings and traffic flaggers are present during peak school times. D6. A complaint made of storm grates installed improperly after a Public Works overlay project. Public Works fixed all the impacted grates. D7. A request to improve damaged bridge barriers on Browndale bridge. Public Works fixed the barriers. D8. A complaint regarding signal timing at W 66th St and Valley View Rd due to backups from W 66th St at France Ave. Hennepin County was contacted and reviewed signal timing. City staff reviewed signal timing as well. Overall volume at the two intersections are impacted and lead to backups during afternoon rush hour. The submitter was requested to travel thru the intersection with patience and caution. The EPD is aware of cuing concerns. D9. A request was made for crosswalk signage over Halifax Ave between Market St and W 50th St. A sign was installed only on the west side of Halifax. The east side of Halifax has limitations due to turning movements and signs previously were damaged. D10. A resident requested a speed display sign on Valley View Rd between W 69th and W 70th St to raise awareness of driver speeds. The sign was placed the first week of November. D11. Two complaints submitted regarding poor signal timing and backups on France Ave at Minnesota Dr and W 76th St. Hennepin County was notified of the issue and reviewed signal operations. Section E: Items recommended for police enforcement E1. A resident requested temporary warning flags for stop signs at Maddox Ln and Hansen Rd to increase awareness of the stop controls. Such flags are only used for a change in traffic control at an intersection. The EPD is requested for increased enforcement. E2. A principal at Highlands Elementary requested parking restriction signs along Doncaster Way at the school’s entrance. Upon review, parking is restricted in the areas due to proximity of driveways and a crosswalk. EPD was requested for enforcement during pickup and drop-off times. Page 20 of 25 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: November 20, 2025 Item Activity: Information Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 6.4 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Other Department: Engineering Item Title: 2025 Work Plan Updates Action Requested: None. Information/Background: Commissioners will provide updates on the status of current work plan initiatives (unless an item is elsewhere on the current agenda). See attached work plan progress report. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2025 Work Plan Progress Report Page 21 of 25 Page 22 of 25 Page 23 of 25 Page 24 of 25 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: November 20, 2025 Item Activity: Discussion Meeting: Transportation Commission Agenda Number: 7.1 Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Type: Other Department: Engineering Item Title: December 18 Meeting Discussion Action Requested: None. Information/Background: The Commission will discuss the potential cancellation of the December 18 regular meeting. Supporting Documentation: None Page 25 of 25