Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-12-10 Planning Commission Packet Meeting location: Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Wednesday, December 10, 2025 7:00 PM Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or at YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535- 8110. Enter access code 2861 185 9105. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn. Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927- 8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes 4.1. Minutes from November 12, 2025 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. 6. Public Hearing During "Public Hearings," the Commission chair will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Chair may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 6.1. Conditional Use Permit with Variances-4201 W 50th Street Page 1 of 129 7. Chair and Member Comments 8. Staff Comments 9. Adjournment 10. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. Page 2 of 129 BOARD & COMMISSION ITEM REPORT Date: December 10, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: Planning Commission Agenda Number: 4.1 Prepared By: Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist Item Type: Minutes Department: Community Development Item Title: Minutes from November 12, 2025 Action Requested: Approve minutes. Information/Background: Supporting Documentation: 1. November 12, 2025 Minutes Page 3 of 129 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 1 of 3 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers November 12, 2025 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Alkire, Bornstein, Daye, Felt, Hahneman, Nelson, Padilla, Smith, Jha, Just, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator; Emily Dalrymple, Assistant Planner; and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: None. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the November 12, 2025, agenda. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, October 29, 2025 Commissioner Daye moved to approve the October 29, 2025, meeting minutes. Commissioner Nelson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment None. VI. Public Hearings A. B-25-I5, Variance at 5213 60th Street West Community Development Coordinator Lewis presented the variance request at 5213 60th Street West. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Page 4 of 129 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 2 of 3 Ms. Kimberly Aune, applicant, addressed the Commission. Staff and the applicant answered Commission questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Daye moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Hahneman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the variance and felt the changes were appropriate. Motion Commissioner Nelson moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the 10.1-foot setback variance from a waterbody at 5213 60th Street West, as outlined in the staff memo, subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Commission discussion can be viewed on the official City website. B. B-25-I4, Side Street Setback Variance at 5801 Fairfax Avenue Assistant Planner Dalrymple presented the request for 5801 Fairfax Avenue for a side street setback variance. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Jared Blackowiac, property owner, addressed the Commission. Staff and the applicant answered Commission questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Daye moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the variance and felt the changes were appropriate. Motion Commissioner Daye moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the 4-foot side street setback variance at 5801 Fairfax Avenue as outlined in the staff Page 5 of 129 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2025 Page 3 of 3 memo, subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Alkire seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Commission discussion can be viewed on the official City website. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review – 5780 Lincoln Drive (Kwik Trip) Director Teague presented Kwik Trip's request for a sketch plan review. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Dean George from Kwik Trip provided a presentation to the Commission. The Commission asked the applicant and staff questions. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered comments, which can be viewed in the official meeting video. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Received IX. Staff Comments Received X. Adjournment Commissioner Padilla moved to adjourn the November 12, 2025, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:54 p.m. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Page 6 of 129 Staff Report Date: 12/10/25 To: PLANNING COMMISSION From: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Subject: Conditional Use Permit with parking stall variances and lot size variances for Mis Amigos at 4201 W. 50th Street Staff Recommendation: Motion to approve a conditional use permit and variance for parking and lot size for a religious institution and school at 4201 W 50th Street subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Information/Background: The subject property, 4201 W. 50th Street, is approximately 1.15 acres and is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of W 50th Street and Indianola Avenue. Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion preschool is requesting a conditional use permit to continue operating the existing church property at 4201 W 50th Street as a place of worship and a licensed early childhood education center. The proposed church use has been present on the site since the church was originally developed in 1955 (date of building construction per Hennepin County). A licensed childcare center started alongside the church during the 1990s. The church closed in Winter of 2023 and there has not been a church or school in operation since. The city has no record of a conditional use permit. Due to the use stopping in 2023, a conditional use permit is required for a church and school use to continue on site. In addition to the conditional use permit, variances are required for the number of parking spaces on site and for the size lot for a church use and daycare use on site. No exterior changes are proposed with the request. The applicant will be utilizing the existing building and parking areas. Surrounding Land Uses: Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Apartment building; zoned PRD-5 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Two Unit residential homes; zoned R-2 Double Dwelling Unit and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features: Page 7 of 129 Staff Report The subject property is a 49,993 square foot, 1.15-acre lot located at the southwest corner of W. 50th Street and Indianola Avenue. The property consists of an existing church building, existing play area and existing parking lot. There are no proposed exterior changes to the building or parking area. Planning: Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District Compliance Table: City Standard Proposed Parking Spaces-Church* 83 spaces 71 spaces* Parking Spaces-Daycare 33 spaces 71 spaces Lot Size-Religious Institution* 3 acres 1.15 acres* Lot Size-Daycare, preschool facility* 2 acres 1.15 acres* *Requires a variance (existing conditions) Traffic and Parking: There is no change to the site access or circulation. The site has access off Indianola Avenue and Jay Place. Stantec conducted a traffic study for the site and proposed uses. The traffic study concludes that the trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Based on the City Code requirements 83 parking spaces are required for the church/religious institution use and 33 spaces are required for the daycare/preschool use. The site continues to have 71 parking spaces available. No additional parking spaces are proposed with the application. Based on the code requirements a parking variance of 12 parking spaces is required for the church/religious institution use. Stantec conducted a parking study for the site and proposed uses. The parking study concludes that the parking provided is adequate for the daycare/preschool use. The study found that with a maximum occupancy event of 276 people (the seating capacity of the largest assembly space), the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The traffic study recommends that the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. This site has previously been used as a church/religious institution and no parking complaints for the site have been received. Page 8 of 129 Staff Report Conditional Use Permit Review: A conditional use is a use allowed by the zoning ordinance, subject to conditions. Unlike permitted uses, conditional uses require review by the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council. Typically, conditional uses are those that may only be allowed under certain criteria or may have impacts that may need to be accounted for. Per Section 36-306, the City may impose conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, operation or duration of the use, as deemed necessary for the protection of the public interest and adjacent properties, to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter (zoning) and other applicable provisions of this Code, and to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Council may require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary to secure compliance with any conditions imposed. No use shall be established or maintained, and no building or other permit for establishing or maintaining such use shall be granted, until the applicant has met and fulfilled all conditions imposed by the council to the satisfaction of the planner. Section 36-305 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance states that the Council shall not grant a conditional use permit, unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on government facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The proposed use is a use that has been in existence since the property was developed in the 50’s. The scale of the church and school uses are not changing and no exterior changes are proposed with the current application. The religious institution and daycare/preschool use will not have any noticeable impact on government facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; A parking study was completed for the City by Stantec, and it was found that the proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; Staff does not foresee any adverse impacts on the public health, safety or welfare resulting from the proposed use. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The use should have no impact on the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located, as imposed by this chapter; and No changes are proposed to the exterior of the building or parking lot layout. The applicant is proposing additional landscaping around the existing playground area. There are variances associated with the applicant’s proposal; for Page 9 of 129 Staff Report parking and for lot size. With the exception of those variances, staff believes the use complies with all other aspects of the zoning ordinance. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed application is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan. Variance Review: Are the proposed variances justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1. Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The application allows the property owner to continue to the use of the property as it has been used since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. The size of the lot, the proposed uses, and the number of parking spaces are not changing. 2. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The proposed application allows the use to continue on the subject property. This is not a new use and no exterior changes are proposed to the building, lot size or parking areas. This is not applicable to other property in the vicinity. 3. There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The need for a variance is unique to the property and is not self-created by the applicant. This property and use has been in existence since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. 4. Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No, the proposed variances would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The property would continue to be used as a church/religious institution and preschool/daycare as it has since it was developed in the 1950’s. There is no exterior changes to the building or parking lot associated with the proposal. Page 10 of 129 Staff Report Recommended Action: Staff recommend approval of the requested conditional use permit and associated variances. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use meets all conditions to grant a conditional use permit. 2. The project does not have an undue adverse impact on government facilities, utilities, or services. 3. The proposed project will have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. 4. The project does not have an undue adverse impact on public health, safety or welfare. 5. The project will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. 6. The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 7. The application meets the variance criteria for the parking variance and lot size variance. 8. The application allows the property owner to continue the use of the property as it has been used since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. The size of the lot, the proposed uses, and the number of parking spaces are not changing. 9. The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner is required to develop a parking plan that identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site during a maximum occupancy event. 2. The property owner is required to submit a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan. Page 11 of 129 Narrative Statement for Conditional Use Permit Property: 4201 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Reason for Conditional Use Permit Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion Preschool is seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to continue operating the existing church property at 4201 W 50th St. as a place of worship and to add a licensed early childhood education center. This proposal maintains the long-standing character and use of the site, which has been a fixture of West 50th Street since 1946. Although zoning laws have evolved over time, our intent is simple: to continue using the property for its original purpose as a space that serves and strengthens the community—through both worship and the education and care of young children. Background and History of the Property The property was originally constructed and operated as a church beginning in 1946. In the 1950s, the church expanded the building and vacated nearby alleys to accommodate its addition. During the 1990s, the site also hosted a licensed childcare center alongside church operations. The church closed in December 2023, and the property was listed for sale in hopes of finding another faith-based user. After an initial sale fell through, the property was relisted in 2025. Mis Amigos was selected in a competitive bid process because our proposal preserves the building, continues its use for worship, and adds a licensed childcare program that benefits local families. Other bidders included a childcare operator that planned to demolish the building to its foundation and a multi-family housing developer. We believe our approach—preserving the existing structure and its long-standing use—is the most responsible and community-friendly path forward. We are requesting that the City reinstate the previous conditional use permit, which recently lapsed due to the closure of Mercy Commons Church. Zoning Context (R-1 District) The property is zoned R-1, which allows both religious institutions and childcare centers with a Conditional Use Permit. ● Lot area: The site totals 1.12 acres. While this is less than the 2-acre minimum for childcare centers and 3-acre minimum for religious institutions, there is no available adjacent land to expand the parcel. ● Setbacks: The building meets the 30’ front setback requirement and maintains existing nonconforming setbacks on other sides (26.8’, 7.6’, and 24.8’). We are not altering the footprint or shape of the building, nor decreasing any setbacks. Without demolishing the existing structure, these conditions cannot be modified, making reinstatement of the CUP the reasonable and practical solution. Parking and Lot Coverage The property’s impervious surface coverage is 45%, below the 50% limit for the zoning district. ● Religious use: The sanctuary seats 276 people, requiring 92 spaces by code; the existing 53-space lot has historically accommodated church operations without issue. ● Childcare use: State requirements call for 1 space per employee and 1 per 20 children. We anticipate approximately 25 employees and 7 additional spaces for parents—well within the lot’s capacity. Page 12 of 129 ● The current parking lot has supported both church and childcare uses in the past, demonstrating it can adequately do so again. At some point in the property’s history, the church began using a portion of the adjacent alleyway as part of its parking layout. The alley provides access only to the garage of one neighboring home and to the church itself. The parking lot aisles are striped to maintain open access to the neighbor ’s garage at all times, and this arrangement has functioned smoothly for many years. The church previously had an agreement with the homeowner to ensure their needs were fully met, and the current property owner supports this sale and proposed use. We intend to maintain this respectful and cooperative relationship going forward. Conclusion As a 16-year Edina resident and owner of Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion Preschool, I am deeply committed to enhancing our community while respecting its history and character. This project continues the property’s legacy as a place of service and learning, preserves a beloved neighborhood landmark, and provides a valuable resource for local families. We respectfully request approval of this Conditional Use Permit to allow both continued worship and licensed childcare operations at 4201 W 50th St. Page 13 of 129 10/29/2025 Dawn Uribe 5353 Wayzata Blvd. Ste 30 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 City of Edina Planning Division 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To Whom it May Concern, Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion Preschool intends to use this property as a licensed early childhood education center serving children ages 0-5. Our program provides full-time Spanish immersion preschool and childcare in a nurturing, culturally rich environment. We plan to preserve the existing building, including the sanctuary space (which will continue to be rented to a church on Sundays), while updating the interior to meet state childcare requirements. Founded in 2001, Mis Amigos is Minnesota’s oldest Spanish immersion preschool and has successfully expanded to multiple locations across the Twin Cities. Instruction is 100% in Spanish, creating an authentic immersion experience that fosters bilingual development through play, learning, and daily interaction. As a 16-year Edina resident, I’m deeply invested in bringing this program to my own community. Mis Amigos has built a strong reputation for high-quality care, integrity, and respect for the neighborhoods we serve. We believe this location will be a positive addition to Edina, maintaining the character of the property while providing a valuable service for local families. Thank you, Dawn Uribe Page 14 of 129 Relieves practical difficulties created by the lot’s historic configuration and size while keeping the building intact. The property’s size and layout were established long before current zoning standards were adopted. The existing lot (1.12 acres) cannot meet today’s minimum acreage or setback requirements for childcare or religious use without demolishing or significantly altering the building. Reinstating the Conditional Use Permit allows us to maintain and use the structure as it was originally built, avoiding unnecessary demolition while keeping the building’s footprint and neighborhood presence unchanged. Addresses extraordinary circumstances unique to this long-established property that predate current zoning requirements. This building has been part of the neighborhood since 1946, serving as a church and community gathering place for nearly 80 years. Its configuration, setbacks, and lot size reflect standards from that era and cannot be replicated under current zoning. These are unique, site-specific circumstances that warrant flexibility. Renewing the Conditional Use Permit recognizes the property’s long-standing institutional use and allows it to continue serving the community in a compatible way. Aligns with the intent of the zoning ordinance by preserving community-serving institutional use within a residential area. Both churches and childcare centers are recognized by the zoning code as appropriate community-serving uses in residential districts when approved under a Conditional Use Permit. This proposal continues those same uses—faith and education—within the existing building, maintaining the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The property will remain a quiet, neighborhood-based institution that strengthens the community without introducing commercial activity or incompatible development. Maintains the character of the neighborhood by retaining the existing structure, protecting its architectural legacy, and ensuring quiet, daytime-oriented activity consistent with the property’s historic use. We intend to preserve the building’s exterior and architectural character, which has long been part of the West 50th Street landscape. The sanctuary will remain a worship space, while weekday childcare use will bring gentle, daytime activity similar in scale and rhythm to previous church and preschool operations. This approach keeps the neighborhood’s look and feel intact while ensuring the property continues to be a welcoming, low-impact community space. Page 15 of 129 Page 16 of 129 W 50TH STREETINDIANOLA AVEALLEYXX3' WIDE SWING DOOR(TYP)4' HIGH CHINLINK FENCE (TYP)58.77' EXISTING PLAYGROUNDEXISTINGCONCRETE WALKEXISTING WOODPRIVACY FENCESTORM EASEMENTRIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTEXISTING MONUMENTSIGNEXISTING CHAIN LINKFENCE4' HIGH CHINLINK FENCE (TYP)27.84'36'STORMEASEMENTSTORM EASEMENTEXISTINGWOOD MULCHPLAYGROUND3' WIDESWING DOOR(TYP)EXISTING PLANTERBOXES (TYP)6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RA1SITE PLAN1" = 20'C-101SITE PLANVSC25001PROJECT NO.SITE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL11/26/25SITE PLAN REVIEW10/30/25NOT FORCONSTRUCTION MIS AMIGOSPLAYGROUND4201 50TH STREETEDINA, MINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREVISIONDATEISSUEPROJECTD E S I G NCIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990123456EDCBA NOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me, or under my direct supervisionand that i am a duly Licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the State of MINNESOTA.Marcelle J. Weslock4232310/30/2025REGISTRATION NO.DATEVAN SICKLECONSTRUCTION6140 LAKEWOOD TRAIL,NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071C/O GREG SICKLE612-226-9618LEGENDEXISTING WOOD MULCH AND PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENTSITE PLAN NOTES1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BYBONNEMA RUNKE STERN, INC., MINNESOTA ON OCTOBER 28, 2025 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT.ELAN DESIGN LAB CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION.VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IFANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIRCONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT INADDITIONAL COST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY AREDISCOVERED SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERINGUN-WITNESSED WORK SHALL RESULT IN REJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.3.VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IFANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIRCONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.PROJECT SUMMARYZONED: R-1 SINGLE DWELLING UNITAREA SUMMARYLOT AREA 49,993 SF. (1.148 AC.) EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 35,054 SF. (70%) 35,054 SF. (70%) BUILDINGS 9,085 SF. (18%) 9,085 SF. (18%)PARKING, WALK, & TRASH 25,969 SF. (52%) 26,669 SF. (52%)PERVIOUS AREA14,939 SF. (30%) 14,939 SF. (30%)PARKING SUMMARYTOTAL PARKING 71 STALLS 2 ACCESSIBLE STALLS69 STANDARD STALLSPERVIOUSPage 17 of 129 W 50TH STREETINDIANOLA AVEALLEYEXISTINGCONCRETE WALKEXISTING WOOD PRIVACY FENCESTORM EASEMENTRIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTEXISTING MONUMENT SIGNEXISTING PLANTING BEDEXISTINGTREEINSTALL TREE 5'MIN. FROMPROPERTY LINE(TYP)SOD RESTORATIONAS NEEDEDA1L-102INSTALL TREES AT 20' MIN.FROM POWER POLEEXISTING CHAIN LINKTREE PLANTING(TYP)C5L-102EXISTING PLANTINGBEDVERIFY EXISTING UTILIITTYLOCATIONS AND INSTALL TREE10' MIN. FROM UTILIITIES(TYP)STORM EASEMENTXX6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RA1LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 20'L-101LANDSCAPEPLANLANDSCAPE NOTESLANDSCAPE SUMMARYSEC. 36-1407-36-1435 LANDSCAPEREQUIREDPROPOSEDOVERSTORY TREE1 TREE/ 40 LF LOT PERIMETERCREDITS OF 2 EXISTING TREES1,154 LF = 29 TREES9 NEW OVERSTORY TREESUNDERSTORY TREES & SHRUBSADDITIONAL TO LANDSCAPE TREATMENT2 ORNAMENTAL TREES & 32 SHRUBSSEC. 36-1457 SCREENINGZONED R-1 10' HIGH SCREENED FROM R-1 DISTRICT WITHIN 200'NEW OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREESNONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGNOT EXTENDED ACROSS STREET& SHRUB/ PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDSOFF-STREET PARKING SCREENED FROM RESIDENTIAL LOT & STREETEXISTING PRIVACY FENCEWITHIN 50'TRASH & MECHANICAL EQUIP.SCREENED FROM ALL LOT LINES & STREETN/ASUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, COORDINATE SUBSTITUTION AND REQUIREMENTSWITH OWNER. SUBMIT WRITTEN DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS FORAPPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND/OR INSTALLATION.PLANT SCHEDULEVSC25001PROJECT NO.SITE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL11/26/25SITE PLAN REVIEW10/30/25NOT FORCONSTRUCTION MIS AMIGOSPLAYGROUND4201 50TH STREETEDINA, MINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREVISIONDATEISSUEPROJECTD E S I G NCIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990123456EDCBA NOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, orunder my direct supervision, and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of thestate of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee SaraithongREGISTRATION NO.10/30/2025DATE45059VAN SICKLECONSTRUCTION6140 LAKEWOOD TRAIL,NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071C/O GREG SICKLE612-226-96181.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUSTENSURE THAT THE FINAL GRADES ARE MET AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORRESOLUTION.2.ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THE CURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OFNURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION.3.QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACEPLANTS IN PROPER SPACING FOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES.4.TOPSOIL TO BE MNDOT 3877.2B LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANTING BEDS. PROVIDE ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROW MNDOT 3877.2E FORPLANT RESTORATION, WATER QUALITY AND INFILTRATION PLANTING. SPREAD TOPSOIL AT MINIMUM 4" OF ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION.5.PLANTING SOIL TO BE CONSISTED OF 50% SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (MNDOT 3877) AND 50% GRADE 2 COMPOST (MNDOT 3890). PLANTING SOIL TO HAVE A PHBETWEEN 6.5-7.5, BE FREE OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS, DEBRIS, LARGE ROCKS GREATER THAN 1/ 2" DIAMETER, AND FRAGMENTS OF WOOD. SUBSOIL SHALL BESCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 4" BEFORE PLANTING SOIL IS SPREAD.6.SPREAD PLANTING SOIL AT MINIMUM EIGHTEEN (18) INCH DEEP IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO PLANTING. THOROUGHLY WATER TWICE TO FACILITATECONSOLIDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING. DO NOT OVERLY COMPACT SOIL.7.SOD SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE INSTALLED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SOD TO BE MNDOT 3878.2A, DENSE, AND OF UNIFORM TEXTURE, FREE OFWEEDS AND DISEASE. APPLY MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND THOROUGHLY APPLY FERTILIZER TO TOP TWO (2) INCHES BEFORE LAYINGSOD. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN SODDED AREAS IN HEALTHY CONDITION UNTIL FIRMLY ROOTED.8.MULCH TO BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (MNDOT 3882 TYPE 6), CONSISTED OF RAW WOOD MATERIAL FROM TIMBER AND BE A PRODUCT OF AMECHANICAL CHIPPER, HAMMER MILL, OR TUB GRINDER. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY FREE OF MOLD, DIRT, SAWDUST, AND FOREIGN MATERIAL ANDSHALL NOT BE IN AN ADVANCED STATE OF DECOMPOSITION. THE MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN CHIPPED UP MANUFACTURED BOARDS OR CHEMICALLY TREATEDWOOD, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WATER BOARD, PARTICLE BOARD, AND CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) OR PENTA TREATED WOOD. THE MATERIALSHALL BE TWICE-GROUND/ SHREDDED, SUCH THAT; NO INDIVIDUAL PIECE SHALL EXCEED 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION.9.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RING AROUND ALL TREES. MAINTAIN MULCH AWAY FROM THETREE TRUNK. NO ALUMINUM EDGING IS REQUIRED.10.EDGE ALL SHRUB BEDS WITH 3/ 16" X 5.5" MILL FINISHED ALUMINUM EDGING WITH STAKES. ALL EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE.11.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB BED AREAS AND APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARKMULCH IN PERENNIAL AREAS.12.APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF 1 - 1 1/2 INCH RIVER ROCK MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER FABRIC IN AREAS INDICATED ON PLAN.13.PLACE 6" - 8" RIVER BOULDER ALONG CREEK PERIMETER AND BURY TO 1/3 DEPTH OF ROCK SIZE.14.WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE BLACK POLYPROPYLENE SHEET 5 OZ/SQ.YD. TENSILE STRENGTH PER ASTM D-4632, PRODUCT BY DEWITT COMPANY OR APPROVEDEQUAL.15.FERTILIZER TO BE A COMMERCIAL FORMULA AND APPLIED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE FERTILIZER WITH PERCENTAGE OF NITROGENREQUIRED TO PROVIDE NOT LESS THAN 1 POUND OF ACTUAL NITROGEN PER 1,000 SQ.FT. OF LAWN AND 10 PERCENT OF POTASSIUM. NITROGEN MUST BE IN A FORMAVAILABLE TO LAWN DURING THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT. PROVIDE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER 20-10-5 FOR TREES AND SHRUBS.16.FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.17.ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS AS INDICATED ON PLAN SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEM TOCOVER ALL PLANTING. NO WATER IS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND SUBMITSHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASING AND INSTALLATION.IRRIGATION DESIGN IS TO MEET ALL CITY AND STATE PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS.18.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTS IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD IS TWO FULL YEARS FROMDATE OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY PERIOD FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED AFTER JUNE 1ST SHALL COMMENCE THEFOLLOWING YEAR.QUANT.KEYCOMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAMESIZEROOTCOND.DECIDUOUS TREESMATURESIZE2B&B2.5" CAL.SHRUBS25'H X 25'WPERENNIALS24" HT.4'H X 4'WPOTSYRINGA MEYERI'PALIBIN'DWARF KOREANLILAC2124" HT.2'H X 3'WPOTSPIRAEAFRITSCHIANAFRITSCH SPIREA111 GAL2'H X 2'WPOTSALVIA NEMOROSA'BLUE BY YOU'BLUE BY YOUSALVIA723B&B2.5" CAL.45' X 30'W1 GAL3'H X 2'WPOTCALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER'KARL FOERSTERFEATHER REED GRASS7ORNAMENTAL TREES2B&B2.0" CAL.20'H X 12'WMALUS IOENSIS'PRAIRIE ROSE'PRAIRIE ROSEFLOWERING CRABAPPLEACER X FREEMANII'AF#1'FIREFALLMAPLEB&B3.5" CAL.50' X 40'WQUERCUS BICOLORSWAMP WHITEOAKSYRINGA RETICULATAJAPANESE TREE LILAC**SUBSTITUTED FOR PLANTINGNEAR POWER POLE2B&B2.5" CAL.35' X 12'WACER RUBRUM'RED ROCKET'RED ROCKETRED MAPLE1 GAL2'H X 2'WPOT10SPOROBOLUSHETEROLEPISPRAIRIE DROPSEEDLEGENDFALL ATTENUATION PADDED UNDERLAYMENTARTIFICIAL TURFFIBER WOOD CHIP PLAY SURFACEDRY CREEKPage 18 of 129 TREE PLANTING(TYP)C5L-102SHRUB PLANTING (TYP)C3L-102EDGING ATPLANTING BED(TYP)C3L-102SOD ATHARDSCAPE(TYP)A5L-102PERENNIAL PLANTING(TYP)A3L-102EXISTING TREEINSTALL EDGING 4"EAST OF FENCE (TYP)EXISTING PLAYGROUND27.1'INSTALL EDGING 4"EAST OF FENCE(TYP)XXXXXXXX3010SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RL-102ENLARGEDLANDSCAPE PLANVSC25001PROJECT NO.SITE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL11/26/25SITE PLAN REVIEW10/30/25NOT FORCONSTRUCTION MIS AMIGOSPLAYGROUND4201 50TH STREETEDINA, MINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREVISIONDATEISSUEPROJECTD E S I G NCIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990123456EDCBA NOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, orunder my direct supervision, and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of thestate of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee SaraithongREGISTRATION NO.10/30/2025DATE45059VAN SICKLECONSTRUCTION6140 LAKEWOOD TRAIL,NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071C/O GREG SICKLE612-226-9618A1ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 10'C5TREE PLANTINGNO SCALETREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCHMOUND SUBGRADESCARIFY BOTTOM PRIORTO PLANTINGCUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.),WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE,40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAPPLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLDUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLMULCH DISHSEE WIDTH ON LANDSCAPE NOTEMULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE ORFIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOTAT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINEDOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE& 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREEINTERVALSNOTESMAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD(SEE SPECIFICATIONS).TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONALTO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARESHOWN.ONE FLAG PER WIRE COMPACT PLANTING SOIL85% MAX.PLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)EDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)PLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOMPRIOR TO PLANTINGMULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADEMAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTSEDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SEE PLAN AND PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING12" MIN.4" MIN.PROVIDE PLANTING BED12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSHOLD SODDED AREA 1" BELOWPAVING SURFACETEMP SOIL AROUND SOIL BALL TO PREVENTTREE SHIFTINGREMOVE ALL POT AND ALL PLASTICLOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTINGB3SHRUB PLANTINGNO SCALEC3EDGING AT PLANTING BEDNO SCALEA3PERENNIAL PLANTINGNO SCALEA5SOD AT HARDSCAPE EDGENO SCALE8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDEOF PREVAILING WINDLOOSEN ROOTSPRIOR TO PLANTING18" MIN.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOMPRIOR TO PLANTING12" MIN.PROVIDE PLANTING BED12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSSET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADEMAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTSTOPSOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)PLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)TOP OF EDGING TO BE MAXIMUM1/2" ABOVE SURFACE MATERIAL12" MIN.PROVIDE PLANTING BED12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSINSTALL STAKES PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATIONGUILDLINESTOP OF MULCH BELOW TOPOF PAVEMENT24" MIN. TO PAVEMENT4" - 6"SCARIFY SIDES OF PITPRIOR TO PLANTING PLANTING SOILWATER & TAMP TOREMOVE AIR POCKETS4" MIN. 18" MIN.6" MIN.6" MIN.Page 19 of 129 Edina Mis Amigos – Occupancy 11/25/2025 Formally Mercy Commons Covenant Church 4201 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 A3 Church Occupancy Main Level seating in pews 201 Occ. Choir seating 25 Occ. Balcony seating in pews 48 Occ. Pastor & Organist 2 Occ. Total 276 Occ. I-4 Child Daycare Occupancy 6 Main Level Classrooms 85 Occ. 5 Lower Level Classrooms 61 Occ. Daycare StaƯ & Assistants 25 Occ. Total 171 Occ. Page 20 of 129 Page 21 of 129 Page 22 of 129 Page 23 of 129 Page 24 of 129 Page 25 of 129 Page 26 of 129 Page 27 of 129 Page 28 of 129 Page 29 of 129 Page 30 of 129 File #193807565 December 4, 2025 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN Page 31 of 129 December 2025 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-5 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY A.M. AND P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 SUNDAY 900-1000 A.M. AND 1100 A.M.-1200 P.M. VOLUMES ........ 4-4 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: December 4, 2025 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 Page 32 of 129 December 2025 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed child daycare and church located at 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN. The proposed project would be located in the existing vacant church building. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street • W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue • W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue • W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue • W. 50th Street/parking lot access • Indianola Avenue/parking lot access The proposed project involves remodeling the existing building into a child daycare center and a church. The daycare center will have space for 146 children and 25 staff. The church will have space for 276 occupants. The daycare will operate Monday through Friday. The church is assumed to have one service on Sunday at 10:00 a.m.. The site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the parking lot behind the building. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access on W. 50 th Street and one on Indianola Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2027. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to generate 133 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 143 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 845 trips daily On Sunday, the proposed project is expected to generate 101 trips during the 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. hour and 101 trips during the 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. hour. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided are 34 spaces greater than the demand. • For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With a maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The 71 total spaces provided are 21 spaces less than the demand. Page 33 of 129 December 2025 1-2 • Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare center and 83 parking stalls for the church. The 71 total spaces provided is 38 spaces greater than the City code requirement for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided is 12 spaces less than the City code requirement for the church. • In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 34 of 129 December 2025 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed child daycare and church located at 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN. The proposed project would be located in the existing vacant church building. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street • W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue • W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue • W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue • W. 50th Street/parking lot access • Indianola Avenue/parking lot access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project involves remodeling the existing building into a child daycare center and a church. The daycare center will have space for 146 children and 25 staff. The church will have space for 276 occupants. The daycare will operate Monday through Friday. The church is assumed to have one service on Sunday at 10:00 a.m.. The site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the parking lot behind the building. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access on W. 50th Street and one on Indianola Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2027. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. Page 35 of 129 December 2025 2-2 Page 36 of 129 December 2025 2-3 Page 37 of 129 December 2025 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed project location currently contains a vacant church building and parking area. The site is bounded by W. 50th Street on the north, Indianola Avenue on the east, and residential uses on the west and south. Near the site location, W. 50th Street, Wooddale Avenue, and Halifax Avenue are two lane roadways with turn lanes and signal control at major intersections. Arden Avenue and Indianola Avenue are two lane undivided roadways. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide a left turn lane, a through lane, and a through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides a left turn/through/right turn lane. The southbound approaches provide a left turn/through and a right turn lane. W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the northbound and southbound approaches. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound approach. All approaches provide a single lane shared by turning and through movements. W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides a left turn lane, a through lane, and a right turn lane. The westbound approach provides a left turn lane and a through/right turn lane. The northbound approach pr ovides a left turn lane and a through/right turn lane. The southbound approaches provide a left turn/through and a right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at each intersection in October, 2025 on a weekday and on a Sunday. During this time period, the W. 50th Street bridge over TH 100 was closed for construction. The collected volumes were adjusted to account for the closure using traffic counts data from past studies in the area and daily traffic volume data from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The resultant volumes are presented later in this report. Page 38 of 129 December 2025 3-2 Page 39 of 129 December 2025 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2027. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak our traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2025 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2027 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2027 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site . • 2027 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2027 No-Build volumes to determine 2027 Build volumes. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday trip generation totals for the proposed daycare center and for the church were calculated using data presented in the eleventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Sunday trip generation for the church was determined assuming a peak attendance 276 people. Based on information from similar facilities, a vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle was used to determine the trip generation. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. Table 4-1 Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Daycare Center 146 students 60 54 114 54 61 115 597 Church 276 occupants 12 7 19 12 16 28 248 Totals 72 61 133 66 77 143 845 Table 4-1 Sunday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Sunday 900-1000 AM Hour Sunday 1100 AM- 1200 PM Hour In Out Total In Out Total Daycare Center 140 students 0 0 0 0 0 0 Church 276 occupants 92 9 101 9 92 101 Totals 92 9 101 9 92 101 Page 40 of 129 December 2025 4-2 Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population con centrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 40 percent to/from the east on W. 50th Street • 40 percent to/from the west on W. 50th Street • 10 percent to/from the south on Wooddale Avenue • 10 percent to/from the south on Halifax Avenue Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. and Sunday peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Page 41 of 129 December 2025 4-3 Page 42 of 129 December 2025 4-4 Page 43 of 129 December 2025 5-5 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay range s from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds f or a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. Page 44 of 129 December 2025 5-6 The LOS results for the study intersections are discussed below. 2025 Existing Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal B/B B/B W. 50th St/Arden Ave NB/SB stop A/E A/F W. 50th St/access NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal B/C B/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements operate at LOS E or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements except the northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS D or better. The northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS F. Sunday 900-1000 AM and 1100 AM-1200 P.M. LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control 900-1000 AM LOS 1100 AM-1200 PM LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal A/A A/A A/A NB/SB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/access NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal A/B A/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the 900-1000 a.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS B or better. During the 1100 a.m.-1200 p.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A or better and movements operate at LOS B or better. 2027 No Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal B/B B/C W. 50th St/Arden Ave NB/SB stop A/E A/F W. 50th St/access NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal B/C B/C Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements operate at LOS E or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements except the northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS D or better. The northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS F. Page 45 of 129 December 2025 5-7 Sunday 900-1000 AM and 1100 AM-1200 P.M. LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control 900-1000 AM LOS 1100 AM-1200 PM LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal A/A A/A A/A NB/SB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/access NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal A/B A/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the 900-1000 a.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS B or better. During the 1100 a.m.-1200 p.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A or better and movements operate at LOS B or better. 2027 Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal B/B B/C W. 50th St/Arden Ave NB/SB stop A/E A/F W. 50th St/access NB stop A/D A/E W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/C A/E W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal B/C B/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements operate at LOS E or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements except the northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS D or better. The northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS F. Sunday 900-1000 AM and 1100 AM-1200 P.M. LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control 900-1000 AM LOS 1100 AM-1200 PM LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal A/A A/A A/A NB/SB stop A/C A/C W. 50th St/access NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal A/B A/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the 900-1000 a.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS C or better. During the 1100 a.m.-1200 p.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A or better and movements operate at LOS C or better. Overall Traffic Impact Under 2025, 2027 No Build, and 2027 Build conditions, left turns onto W. 50th Street at Arden Avenue operate at poor levels of service with minor street stop control due to the large amount of through traffic on W. 50th Street. While not ideal, this condition often occurs at minor street stop controlled intersections with large volumes on the major street. Page 46 of 129 December 2025 5-8 As an additional check, the queue lengths on Ardern Avenue were reviewed to determine if they are excessive. Due to the low volume of traffic on Arden Avenue, the queue lengths are not expected to be excessive under any of the scenarios. The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on both sides of W. 50th Street and the west side of Indianola Avenue near the proposed project. Sidewalk is also provided on both sides of Halifax Avenue, Market Street, Arden Avenue north of W. 50th Street, and Wooddale Avenue north of W. 50th Street. Sidewalk is provided on the east side of Wooddale Avenue south of W. 50th Street. No sidewalk is provided on Arden Avenue south of W. 50 th Street. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by Metro Transit bus route 46 on W. 50th Street. Bus stops exist on both sides of W. 50th Street at the project location. Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. • Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 47 of 129 December 2025 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the existing parking lot behind the building. Parking demand was calculated separately for the daycare center, which operates only on weekdays, and for the church assuming a maximum capacity service on a Sunday. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare and 83 parking stalls for the church. Based on this information, the existing 71 stalls are adequate for the daycare center on weekdays but less than the expected peak parking demand for the church. In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during maximum occupancy events. Page 48 of 129 December 2025 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to generate 133 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 143 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 845 trips daily On Sunday, the proposed project is expected to generate 101 trips during the 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. hour and 101 trips during the 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. hour. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided are 34 spaces greater than the demand. • For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With a maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The 71 total spaces provided are 21 spaces less than the demand. • Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare center and 83 parking stalls for the church. The 71 total spaces provided is 38 spaces greater than the City code requirement for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided is 12 spaces less than the City code requirement for the church. • In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. Page 49 of 129 December 2025 7-2 • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 50 of 129 December 2025 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets Page 51 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 AM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 78 506 136 43 888 39 156 79 72 53 129 128Future Volume (veh/h) 78 506 136 43 888 39 156 79 72 53 129 128Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 84 544 146 46 955 42 168 85 77 57 139 138Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 311 1272 340 414 1590 70 299 143 96 218 461 524Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.330.33 0.33 0.33Sat Flow, veh/h 565 2773 741 753 3467 152 520 433 290 330 13951585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 84 348 342 46 489 508 330 0 0 196 0 138Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 565 1777 1737 753 1777 1843 1243 00 1725 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 5.6 5.7 1.9 8.8 8.8 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.4 5.6 5.7 7.5 8.8 8.8 10.7 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 2.7Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.08 0.51 0.23 0.29 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 815 797 414 815 845 538 0 0 679 0 524V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.43 0.43 0.11 0.60 0.60 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 376 1019 996 501 1019 1057 770 0 0 959 0798HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.0 7.8 7.8 10.3 8.6 8.6 13.3 0.00.0 10.7 0.0 10.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 1.6 1.6 0.3 2.6 2.6 2.5 0.0 0.01.1 0.0 0.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 14.5 8.1 8.2 10.5 9.4 9.3 14.5 0.0 0.010.9 0.0 10.7LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 774 1043 330 334Approach Delay, s/veh 8.8 9.4 14.5 10.9Approach LOS A A B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 24.1 18.6 24.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 24.5 21.5 24.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 16.4 5.3 10.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 3.2 1.4 5.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.1HCM 7th LOS BPage 52 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 9 571 7 1 748 21 10 7 4 21 4 25Future Vol, veh/h 9 571 7 1 748 21 10 7 4 21 4 25Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 10 607 7 1 796 22 11 7 4 22 4 27Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 818 0 0 615 0 0 1430 1451 611 1439 1443 807 Stage 1 - - - - - - 630 630 - 809 809 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 800 820 - 630 634 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 810 - - 965 - - 112 131 494 111 132 381 Stage 1 - - - - - - 469 475 - 374 394 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 379 389 - 469 473 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 810 - - 965 - - 99 128 494 101 129 381Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 99 128 - 101 129 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 461 466 - 373 393 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 348 388 - 450 464 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.15 0.01 38.89 36.95HCM LOS E EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 128 28 - - 2 - - 165HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 0.012 - - 0.001 - - 0.323HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 38.9 9.5 0 - 8.7 0 - 37HCM Lane LOS E A A - A A - EHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 1.3Page 53 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 589 1 1 701 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 589 1 1 701 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 627 1 1 746 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 628 0 1375 627 Stage 1 - - - - 627 - Stage 2 - - - - 748 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 954 - 160 483 Stage 1 - - - - 532 - Stage 2 - - - - 468 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 954 - 160 483Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 160 - Stage 1 - - - - 532 - Stage 2 - - - - 467 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 24.17HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 192 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 24.2 - - 8.8 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 54 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 556 10 2 626 7 5Future Vol, veh/h 556 10 2 626 7 5Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 585 11 2 659 7 5Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 596 0 1254 591 Stage 1 - - - - 591 - Stage 2 - - - - 663 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 981 - 190 507 Stage 1 - - - - 554 - Stage 2 - - - - 512 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 981 - 189 507Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 189 - Stage 1 - - - - 554 - Stage 2 - - - - 511 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 19.79HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 256 - - 6 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 19.8 - - 8.7 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 55 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 AM 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 92 298 171 28 374 21 173 53 12 10 39 81Future Volume (veh/h) 92 298 171 28 374 21 173 53 12 10 39 81Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 97 314 180 29 394 22 182 56 13 11 41 85Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 391 889 753 429 517 29 467 471 109 122 161 165Arrive On Green 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.32 0.320.10 0.10 0.10Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 903 1755 98 1781 1468 341 227 1551 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 97 314 180 29 0 416 182 0 69 52 0 85Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 903 0 1853 1781 0 1809 1778 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 4.7 3.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 3.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 4.7 3.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 3.7 0.0 1.2 1.10.0 2.2Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.19 0.21 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 391 889 753 429 0 546 467 0 581 284 0 165V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.35 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.76 0.39 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.52Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 472 1333 1130 602 0 901 484 0 1207 865 0699HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.4 7.3 6.9 11.4 0.0 14.2 13.4 0.010.6 18.2 0.0 18.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.5Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 3.4 1.3 0.0 0.40.5 0.0 0.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.8 7.6 7.0 11.4 0.0 16.4 14.0 0.0 10.7 18.6 0.0 21.2LnGrp LOS A A A B B B B B CApproach Vol, veh/h 591 445 251 137Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 16.1 13.1 20.2Approach LOS A B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.7 25.5 9.6 9.1 8.0 17.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 31.5 5.5 19.5 5.5 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 6.7 5.7 4.2 3.5 11.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.5HCM 7th LOS BPage 56 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 13 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 26 13 13 0 - 0 Stage 1 13 - - - - - Stage 2 13 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 990 - - - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1606 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 57 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 80 516 139 44 906 40 159 81 73 54 132 131Future Volume (veh/h) 80 516 139 44 906 40 159 81 73 54 132 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 555 149 47 974 43 171 87 78 58 142 141Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 302 1279 342 405 1599 71 296 143 96 216 462 531Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.340.34 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 554 2772 742 743 3467 153 518 427 286 331 13791585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 355 349 47 499 518 336 0 0 200 0 141Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 554 1777 1737 743 1777 1843 1231 00 1710 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 6.1 5.9 6.0 2.0 9.3 9.3 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.4 5.9 6.0 8.0 9.3 9.3 11.4 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 2.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.08 0.51 0.23 0.29 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 302 820 801 405 820 850 535 0 0 678 0 531V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.43 0.44 0.12 0.61 0.61 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.27Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 353 985 963 474 985 1021 737 0 0 923 0 771HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.7 8.0 8.0 10.7 8.9 8.9 13.8 0.00.0 10.9 0.0 10.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 1.7 1.7 0.3 2.8 2.9 2.7 0.0 0.01.2 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.2 8.4 8.4 10.8 9.7 9.7 15.0 0.0 0.011.2 0.0 11.0LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 790 1064 336 341Approach Delay, s/veh 9.1 9.7 15.0 11.1Approach LOS A A B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.3 24.9 19.3 24.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 24.5 21.5 24.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.4 17.4 5.5 11.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 3.0 1.5 5.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.4HCM 7th LOS BPage 58 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 9 582 7 1 763 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Future Vol, veh/h 9 582 7 1 763 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 10 619 7 1 812 22 11 7 4 22 4 28Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 834 0 0 627 0 0 1458 1478 623 1467 1471 823 Stage 1 - - - - - - 642 642 - 825 825 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 816 836 - 642 646 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 799 - - 955 - - 107 126 486 106 127 374 Stage 1 - - - - - - 463 469 - 367 387 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 371 382 - 463 467 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 799 - - 955 - - 94 123 486 97 125 374Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 94 123 - 97 125 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 454 460 - 366 386 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 339 382 - 443 459 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.14 0.01 40.79 38.66HCM LOS E EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 123 27 - - 2 - - 160HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.182 0.012 - - 0.001 - - 0.339HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 40.8 9.6 0 - 8.8 0 - 38.7HCM Lane LOS E A A - A A - EHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 1.4Page 59 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 601 1 1 715 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 601 1 1 715 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 639 1 1 761 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 640 0 1403 640 Stage 1 - - - - 640 - Stage 2 - - - - 763 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 944 - 154 475 Stage 1 - - - - 525 - Stage 2 - - - - 460 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 944 - 154 475Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 154 - Stage 1 - - - - 525 - Stage 2 - - - - 459 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 24.9HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 185 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 24.9 - - 8.8 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 60 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 567 10 2 639 7 5Future Vol, veh/h 567 10 2 639 7 5Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 597 11 2 673 7 5Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 607 0 1279 602 Stage 1 - - - - 602 - Stage 2 - - - - 677 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 971 - 183 500 Stage 1 - - - - 547 - Stage 2 - - - - 505 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 971 - 183 500Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 183 - Stage 1 - - - - 547 - Stage 2 - - - - 503 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 20.28HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 248 - - 6 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 20.3 - - 8.7 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 61 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM No-Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 94 304 174 29 382 21 176 54 12 10 40 83Future Volume (veh/h) 94 304 174 29 382 21 176 54 12 10 40 83Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 320 183 31 402 22 185 57 13 11 42 87Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 388 894 757 428 524 29 467 473 108 120 161 164Arrive On Green 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.32 0.320.10 0.10 0.10Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 896 1757 96 1781 1474 336 223 1557 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 320 183 31 0 424 185 0 70 53 0 87Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 896 0 1853 1781 0 1810 1780 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 4.8 3.0 1.1 0.0 9.3 3.8 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 4.8 3.0 1.1 0.0 9.3 3.8 0.0 1.2 1.20.0 2.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.19 0.21 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 388 894 757 428 0 553 467 0 581 281 0 164V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.36 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.77 0.40 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.53Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 467 1317 1116 591 0 891 478 0 1193 855 0691HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.5 7.4 6.9 11.4 0.0 14.3 13.6 0.010.7 18.5 0.0 19.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.6Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.4 0.8 0.2 0.0 3.6 1.4 0.0 0.40.5 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.9 7.6 7.1 11.5 0.0 16.6 14.2 0.0 10.8 18.8 0.0 21.7LnGrp LOS A A A B B B B B CApproach Vol, veh/h 602 455 255 140Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 16.2 13.2 20.6Approach LOS A B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.9 25.9 9.7 9.1 8.0 17.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 31.5 5.5 19.5 5.5 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 6.8 5.8 4.3 3.5 11.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.6HCM 7th LOS BPage 62 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 13 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 26 13 13 0 - 0 Stage 1 13 - - - - - Stage 2 13 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 990 - - - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1606 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 63 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 80 545 139 49 931 40 159 81 80 54 132 131Future Volume (veh/h) 80 545 139 49 931 40 159 81 80 54 132 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 586 149 53 1001 43 171 87 86 58 142 141Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 292 1304 331 391 1613 69 290 141 104 214 460 535Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.340.34 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 540 2807 712 722 3471 149 510 417 309 331 13631585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 370 365 53 512 532 344 0 0 200 0 141Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 540 1777 1742 722 1777 1844 1235 00 1693 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 6.5 6.4 6.5 2.4 9.9 9.9 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.4 6.4 6.5 8.9 9.9 9.9 12.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 2.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.08 0.50 0.25 0.29 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 292 826 809 391 826 857 536 0 0 674 0 535V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.45 0.45 0.14 0.62 0.62 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 331 956 937 444 956 991 715 0 0 891 0 748HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.3 8.2 8.3 11.3 9.2 9.2 14.2 0.00.0 11.2 0.0 11.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 1.9 1.9 0.3 3.0 3.1 2.9 0.0 0.01.3 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.9 8.6 8.7 11.4 10.1 10.1 15.5 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 11.2LnGrp LOS B A A B B B B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 821 1097 344 341Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 10.2 15.5 11.3Approach LOS A B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.9 25.7 19.9 25.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 24.5 21.5 24.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 18.4 5.6 11.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 2.8 1.5 5.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.8HCM 7th LOS BPage 64 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 9 618 7 1 793 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Future Vol, veh/h 9 618 7 1 793 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 10 657 7 1 844 22 11 7 4 22 4 28Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 866 0 0 665 0 0 1528 1548 661 1537 1541 855 Stage 1 - - - - - - 680 680 - 857 857 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 848 868 - 680 684 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - - 924 - - 96 114 462 95 115 358 Stage 1 - - - - - - 441 451 - 352 374 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 356 370 - 441 449 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - - 924 - - 83 112 462 86 113 358Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 83 112 - 86 113 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 432 442 - 351 373 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 324 369 - 421 440 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.14 0.01 45.99 44.22HCM LOS E EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 110 25 - - 2 - - 144HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.204 0.012 - - 0.001 - - 0.376HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 46 9.7 0 - 8.9 0 - 44.2HCM Lane LOS E A A - A A - EHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - 0 - - 1.6Page 65 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.6Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 601 37 1 729 19 15Future Vol, veh/h 601 37 1 729 19 15Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 639 39 1 776 20 16Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 679 0 1437 659 Stage 1 - - - - 659 - Stage 2 - - - - 778 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 913 - 147 464 Stage 1 - - - - 515 - Stage 2 - - - - 453 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 913 - 147 464Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 147 - Stage 1 - - - - 515 - Stage 2 - - - - 452 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 25.68HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 210 - - 2 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.172 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 25.7 - - 8.9 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - 0 -Page 66 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 582 10 38 639 21 21Future Vol, veh/h 582 10 38 639 21 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 613 11 40 673 22 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 623 0 1371 618 Stage 1 - - - - 618 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 958 - 161 489 Stage 1 - - - - 538 - Stage 2 - - - - 465 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 958 - 150 489Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 150 - Stage 1 - - - - 538 - Stage 2 - - - - 434 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.5 24.32HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 230 - - 101 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.192 - - 0.042 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 24.3 - - 8.9 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 0.1 -Page 67 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 94 329 180 29 411 21 183 54 12 10 40 83Future Volume (veh/h) 94 329 180 29 411 21 183 54 12 10 40 83Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 346 189 31 433 22 193 57 13 11 42 87Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 377 911 772 427 550 28 463 468 107 117 157 160Arrive On Green 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.32 0.320.10 0.10 0.10Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 870 1765 90 1781 1474 336 223 1556 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 346 189 31 0 455 193 0 70 53 0 87Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 870 0 1854 1781 0 1810 1780 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 5.4 3.2 1.2 0.0 10.3 4.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 5.4 3.2 1.2 0.0 10.3 4.1 0.0 1.3 1.2 0.0 2.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.19 0.21 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 377 911 772 427 0 578 463 0 575 274 0 160V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.38 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.79 0.42 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.54Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 435 1260 1068 561 0 864 463 0 1173 844 0684HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.7 7.4 6.9 11.3 0.0 14.5 14.2 0.011.2 19.2 0.0 19.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.9 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.9Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.6 0.8 0.2 0.0 4.0 1.5 0.0 0.40.5 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.1 7.7 7.1 11.4 0.0 17.4 14.8 0.0 11.3 19.5 0.0 22.6LnGrp LOS B A A B B B B B CApproach Vol, veh/h 634 486 263 140Approach Delay, s/veh 7.9 17.0 13.8 21.4Approach LOS A B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.2 27.0 10.0 9.2 8.1 18.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.9 31.1 5.5 19.9 5.1 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 7.4 6.1 4.4 3.5 12.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.1HCM 7th LOS BPage 68 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 30 0 0 12 12 36Future Vol, veh/h 30 0 0 12 12 36Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 32 0 0 13 13 38Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 45 32 51 0 - 0 Stage 1 32 - - - - - Stage 2 13 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 966 1042 1555 - - - Stage 1 991 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 966 1042 1555 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 966 - - - - - Stage 1 991 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.86 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1555 - 966 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.033 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.9 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -Page 69 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 PM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 96 854 154 65 681 58 168 148 50 80 160 120Future Volume (veh/h) 96 854 154 65 681 58 168 148 50 80 160 120Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 101 899 162 68 717 61 177 156 53 84 168 126Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 339 1361 245 246 1500 128 272 220 63 239 437 610Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.39 0.390.39 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 694 3008 542 532 3315 282 459 570 164 395 11351585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 101 531 530 68 384 394 386 0 0 252 0 126Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 694 1777 1773 532 1777 1820 1194 00 1530 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 12.9 12.9 6.3 8.4 8.4 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.0 12.9 12.9 19.3 8.4 8.4 17.2 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 2.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.15 0.46 0.14 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 804 802 246 804 823 554 0 0 676 0 610V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.66 0.66 0.28 0.48 0.48 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 407 978 976 299 978 1002 807 0 0 962 0 901HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.8 11.8 11.8 19.4 10.6 10.6 16.5 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 11.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 4.5 4.5 0.8 2.8 2.9 4.2 0.0 0.02.0 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.3 13.1 13.1 20.0 11.0 11.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 11.5LnGrp LOS B B B B B B B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 1162 846 386 378Approach Delay, s/veh 13.4 11.8 18.1 12.2Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.8 29.6 25.8 29.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.5 31.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.2 17.0 7.8 21.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.1 6.6 2.0 3.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.4HCM 7th LOS BPage 70 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 929 10 6 698 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Future Vol, veh/h 6 929 10 6 698 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 6 988 11 6 743 34 6 1 5 22 7 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 777 0 0 999 0 0 1765 1796 994 1774 1784 760 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1006 1006 - 772 772 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 759 789 - 1002 1012 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 840 - - 693 - - 65 80 298 65 82 406 Stage 1 - - - - - - 291 319 - 392 409 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 399 402 - 292 317 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 840 - - 693 - - 54 78 298 60 79 406Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 54 78 - 60 79 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 286 313 - 386 402 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 364 395 - 281 311 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.06 0.08 54.29 74.32HCM LOS F FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 86 11 - - 15 - - 100HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 0.008 - - 0.009 - - 0.519HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 54.3 9.3 0 - 10.2 0 - 74.3HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - FHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 2.3Page 71 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 849 1 1 689 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 849 1 1 689 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 913 1 1 741 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 914 0 1656 913 Stage 1 - - - - 913 - Stage 2 - - - - 743 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 746 - 108 331 Stage 1 - - - - 391 - Stage 2 - - - - 470 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 746 - 107 331Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 107 - Stage 1 - - - - 391 - Stage 2 - - - - 469 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 27.49HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 162 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 27.5 - - 9.8 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 72 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 743 10 1 660 6 3Future Vol, veh/h 743 10 1 660 6 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 790 11 1 702 6 3Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 801 0 1500 796 Stage 1 - - - - 796 - Stage 2 - - - - 704 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 822 - 134 387 Stage 1 - - - - 444 - Stage 2 - - - - 490 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 822 - 134 387Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 134 - Stage 1 - - - - 444 - Stage 2 - - - - 489 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 27.23HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 171 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 27.2 - - 9.4 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 73 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 PM 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 28 442 220 39 291 38 216 106 28 25 102 137Future Volume (veh/h) 28 442 220 39 291 38 216 106 28 25 102 137Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 29 465 232 41 306 40 227 112 29 26 107 144Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 324 754 639 316 435 57 511 565 146 128 239 242Arrive On Green 0.03 0.40 0.40 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.39 0.390.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 748 1620 212 1781 1433 371 2061562 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 465 232 41 0 346 227 0 141 133 0 144Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 748 0 1832 1781 0 1804 1768 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 8.8 4.6 2.1 0.0 7.6 4.3 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.0 3.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 8.8 4.6 4.8 0.0 7.6 4.3 0.0 2.3 2.90.0 3.8Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 0.20 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 324 754 639 316 0 492 511 0 712 367 0 242V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.62 0.36 0.13 0.00 0.70 0.44 0.00 0.20 0.36 0.00 0.59Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 483 1700 1441 627 0 1254 800 0 1640 9670 801HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.7 10.6 9.3 14.9 0.0 14.7 11.5 0.0 8.9 17.2 0.0 17.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 2.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 2.9 1.3 0.3 0.0 2.9 1.4 0.0 0.71.1 0.0 1.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.8 11.4 9.6 15.0 0.0 16.5 12.1 0.0 9.0 17.8 0.0 19.9LnGrp LOS B B A B B B A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 726 387 368 277Approach Delay, s/veh 10.8 16.4 10.9 18.9Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.1 22.5 10.8 11.3 6.0 16.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.5 40.5 13.5 22.5 5.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 10.8 6.3 5.8 2.5 9.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 4.1 0.4 1.1 0.0 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.3HCM 7th LOS BPage 74 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 11 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 20 11 11 0 - 0 Stage 1 11 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 997 - - - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1609 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 75 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 98 871 157 66 695 59 171 151 51 82 163 122Future Volume (veh/h) 98 871 157 66 695 59 171 151 51 82 163 122Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 917 165 69 732 62 180 159 54 86 172 128Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 327 1362 245 234 1501 127 269 218 63 238 437 623Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.39 0.390.39 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 684 3009 541 521 3316 281 455 556 161 395 11141585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 541 541 69 392 402 393 0 0 258 0 128Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 684 1777 1773 521 1777 1820 1172 00 1509 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 7.3 14.0 14.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.3 14.0 14.0 21.0 9.0 9.0 18.9 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 3.1Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.15 0.46 0.14 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 327 804 802 234 804 824 551 0 0 675 0 623V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.67 0.67 0.29 0.49 0.49 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 376 931 929 272 931 954 755 0 0 906 0 858HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.9 12.5 12.5 20.8 11.2 11.2 17.4 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 11.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.6 1.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.0 5.0 0.8 3.1 3.2 4.6 0.0 0.02.1 0.0 1.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.5 14.1 14.1 21.5 11.6 11.6 19.4 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 11.8LnGrp LOS B B B C B B B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 1185 863 393 386Approach Delay, s/veh 14.4 12.4 19.4 12.5Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 30.8 27.4 30.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.5 31.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.9 18.3 8.4 23.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 6.3 2.0 3.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.2HCM 7th LOS BPage 76 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 948 10 6 712 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Future Vol, veh/h 6 948 10 6 712 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 6 1009 11 6 757 34 6 1 5 22 7 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 791 0 0 1019 0 0 1801 1831 1014 1809 1819774 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1027 1027 - 787 787 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 774 804 - 1022 1032 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 829 - - 681 - - 62 76 290 61 78 398 Stage 1 - - - - - - 283 312 - 385 403 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 391 396 - 285 310 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 829 - - 681 - - 51 74 290 57 75 398Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 51 74 - 57 75 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 278 306 - 378 396 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 356 389 - 274 305 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.06 0.08 57.82 81.32HCM LOS F FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 81 11 - - 14 - - 95HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 0.008 - - 0.009 - - 0.548HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 57.8 9.4 0 - 10.3 0 - 81.3HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - FHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 2.5Page 77 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 866 1 1 703 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 866 1 1 703 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 931 1 1 756 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 932 0 1690 932 Stage 1 - - - - 932 - Stage 2 - - - - 758 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 734 - 103 323 Stage 1 - - - - 383 - Stage 2 - - - - 463 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 734 - 102 323Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 102 - Stage 1 - - - - 383 - Stage 2 - - - - 462 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 28.46HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 156 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 28.5 - - 9.9 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 78 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 758 10 1 673 6 3Future Vol, veh/h 758 10 1 673 6 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 806 11 1 716 6 3Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 817 0 1530 812 Stage 1 - - - - 812 - Stage 2 - - - - 718 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 811 - 129 379 Stage 1 - - - - 437 - Stage 2 - - - - 483 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 811 - 129 379Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 129 - Stage 1 - - - - 437 - Stage 2 - - - - 482 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 28.17HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 165 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 28.2 - - 9.4 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 79 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM No-Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 29 451 224 40 297 39 220 108 29 26 104 140Future Volume (veh/h) 29 451 224 40 297 39 220 108 29 26 104 140Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 475 236 42 313 41 232 114 31 27 109 147Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 322 760 644 309 440 58 511 561 152 127 239 243Arrive On Green 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.40 0.400.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 739 1620 212 1781 1416 385 2101555 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 475 236 42 0 354 232 0 145 136 0 147Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 739 0 1832 1781 0 1801 1765 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 9.2 4.7 2.2 0.0 7.9 4.5 0.0 2.4 0.4 0.0 3.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 9.2 4.7 5.3 0.0 7.9 4.5 0.0 2.4 3.10.0 3.9Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 0.20 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 760 644 309 0 498 511 0 713 366 0 243V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.62 0.37 0.14 0.00 0.71 0.45 0.00 0.20 0.37 0.00 0.60Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 474 1665 1411 603 0 1228 823 0 1603 9080 749HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.9 10.7 9.4 15.3 0.0 15.0 11.7 0.0 9.0 17.6 0.0 18.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 2.4Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 3.1 1.3 0.3 0.0 3.0 1.5 0.0 0.81.2 0.0 1.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.0 11.6 9.8 15.5 0.0 16.8 12.3 0.0 9.2 18.2 0.0 20.4LnGrp LOS B B A B B B A B CApproach Vol, veh/h 742 396 377 283Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 16.7 11.1 19.3Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 23.0 11.0 11.5 6.1 16.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.5 40.5 14.5 21.5 5.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 11.2 6.5 5.9 2.5 9.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.2 0.4 1.1 0.0 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.6HCM 7th LOS BPage 80 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 11 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 20 11 11 0 - 0 Stage 1 11 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 997 - - - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1609 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 81 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 98 898 157 73 726 59 171 151 57 82 163 122Future Volume (veh/h) 98 898 157 73 726 59 171 151 57 82 163 122Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 945 165 77 764 62 180 159 60 86 172 128Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 316 1403 245 226 1544 125 257 209 68 230 426 624Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.39 0.39 0.390.39 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 663 3024 528 508 3329 270 444 531 172 392 10831585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 555 555 77 408 418 399 0 0 258 0 128Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 663 1777 1775 508 1777 1822 1147 00 1475 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 15.4 15.4 8.8 10.1 10.1 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.2 15.4 15.4 24.2 10.1 10.1 21.5 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 3.4Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.15 0.45 0.15 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 316 824 824 226 824 845 534 0 0 656 0 624V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.67 0.67 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 349 915 914 252 915 938 636 0 0 771 0 741HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.1 13.2 13.2 22.6 11.8 11.8 19.4 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 12.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 5.6 5.7 1.0 3.5 3.6 5.6 0.0 0.02.4 0.0 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.7 14.9 14.9 23.5 12.2 12.2 23.4 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 12.8LnGrp LOS B B B C B B C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 1213 903 399 386Approach Delay, s/veh 15.2 13.2 23.4 13.6Approach LOS B B C BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.3 33.8 29.3 33.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 32.5 29.5 32.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 23.5 20.2 9.1 26.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 6.5 2.0 3.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 15.5HCM 7th LOS BPage 82 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 981 10 6 750 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Future Vol, veh/h 6 981 10 6 750 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 6 1044 11 6 798 34 6 1 5 22 7 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 832 0 0 1054 0 0 1876 1906 1049 1885 1895815 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1062 1062 - 828 828 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 814 845 - 1057 1067 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 801 - - 660 - - 55 69 276 54 70 377 Stage 1 - - - - - - 270 300 - 365 386 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 372 379 - 272 299 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 801 - - 660 - - 44 66 276 50 67 377Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 44 66 - 50 67 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 265 294 - 359 379 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 337 372 - 261 293 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.06 0.08 66.51 99.94HCM LOS F FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 71 11 - - 14 - - 85HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.18 0.008 - - 0.01 - - 0.616HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 66.5 9.5 0 - 10.5 0 - 99.9HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - FHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 2.8Page 83 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.9Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 866 34 1 722 19 19Future Vol, veh/h 866 34 1 722 19 19Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 931 37 1 776 20 20Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 968 0 1728 949 Stage 1 - - - - 949 - Stage 2 - - - - 778 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 712 - 97 316 Stage 1 - - - - 376 - Stage 2 - - - - 453 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 712 - 97 316Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 97 - Stage 1 - - - - 376 - Stage 2 - - - - 451 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 38.23HCM LOS EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 148 - - 2 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.275 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 38.2 - - 10.1 0HCM Lane LOS E - - B AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - - 0 -Page 84 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.4Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 777 10 33 673 25 23Future Vol, veh/h 777 10 33 673 25 23Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 827 11 35 716 27 24Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 837 0 1618 832 Stage 1 - - - - 832 - Stage 2 - - - - 786 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 797 - 114 369 Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 - - - - 449 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 797 - 105 369Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 105 - Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 - - - - 416 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.45 37.63HCM LOS EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 160 - - 84 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.319 - - 0.044 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 37.6 - - 9.7 0HCM Lane LOS E - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - - 0.1 -Page 85 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 29 482 232 40 324 39 226 108 29 26 104 140Future Volume (veh/h) 29 482 232 40 324 39 226 108 29 26 104 140Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 507 244 42 341 41 238 114 31 27 109 147Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 314 780 661 295 469 56 506 555 151 123 235 240Arrive On Green 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.39 0.390.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 712 1638 197 1781 1416 385 2101554 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 507 244 42 0 382 238 0 145 136 0 147Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 712 0 1835 1781 0 1801 1764 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 10.2 5.0 2.4 0.0 8.9 4.8 0.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 4.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 10.2 5.0 6.4 0.0 8.9 4.8 0.0 2.5 3.2 0.0 4.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.21 0.20 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 314 780 661 295 0 525 506 0 706 358 0 240V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.65 0.37 0.14 0.00 0.73 0.47 0.00 0.21 0.38 0.00 0.61Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 459 1645 1394 566 0 1225 756 0 1508 8760 722HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.0 11.0 9.5 16.0 0.0 15.2 12.3 0.0 9.5 18.3 0.0 18.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 2.5Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 3.5 1.4 0.4 0.0 3.4 1.7 0.0 0.81.3 0.0 1.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.1 11.9 9.8 16.3 0.0 17.1 12.9 0.0 9.6 19.0 0.0 21.3LnGrp LOS B B A B B B A B CApproach Vol, veh/h 782 424 383 283Approach Delay, s/veh 11.2 17.0 11.7 20.2Approach LOS B B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 24.2 11.4 11.6 6.2 18.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.5 41.5 13.5 21.5 5.5 31.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 12.2 6.8 6.1 2.5 10.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.5 0.4 1.1 0.0 2.7Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.0HCM 7th LOS BPage 86 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 33 0 0 9 10 35Future Vol, veh/h 33 0 0 9 10 35Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 35 0 0 9 11 37Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 38 29 47 0 - 0 Stage 1 29 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1046 1560 - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1046 1560 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 974 - - - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.83 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1560 - 974 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.036 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.8 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -Page 87 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 7 165 37 27 194 16 58 35 46 24 48 33Future Volume (veh/h) 7 165 37 27 194 16 58 35 46 24 48 33Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 236 53 39 277 23 83 50 66 34 69 47Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 617 804 177 620 923 76 395 113 115 348 323 375Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1079 2894 638 1090 3324 274 505 479 488 378 1365 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 143 146 39 147 153 199 0 0 103 0 47Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1079 1777 1756 1090 1777 1821 1472 0 0 1743 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 1.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.80.0 0.4Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.15 0.42 0.33 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 617 493 488 620 493 506 623 0 0 671 0 375V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.29 0.30 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.13Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1395 1774 1753 1406 1774 1818 1921 0 02081 0 1754HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.8 5.3 5.3 6.0 5.3 5.3 6.2 0.0 0.05.7 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.8 5.6 5.6 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.5 0.0 0.0 5.80.0 5.7LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 299 339 199 150Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 5.7 6.5 5.8Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 9.6 8.9 9.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 3.4 2.8 3.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 1.4 0.6 1.6Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.8HCM 7th LOS APage 88 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 219 1 6 223 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Future Vol, veh/h 6 219 1 6 223 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 300 1 8 305 10 4 3 1 21 5 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 315 0 0 301 0 0 642 649 301 645 645 310 Stage 1 - - - - - - 317 317 - 327 327 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 325 332 - 318 318 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 - - 1260 - - 387 389 739 385 391 730 Stage 1 - - - - - - 694 654 - 686 648 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 688 645 - 694 654 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 - - 1260 - - 366 383 739 376 385 730Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 366 383 - 376 385 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 689 649 - 680 643 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 659 640 - 684 649 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.2 14.05 13.37HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 406 48 - - 45 - - 475HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.007 - - 0.007 - - 0.095HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.1 7.9 0 - 7.9 0 - 13.4HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3Page 89 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM 9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 235 1 1 236 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 235 1 1 236 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 336 1 1 337 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 337 0 676 336 Stage 1 - - - - 336 - Stage 2 - - - - 340 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1222 - 419 706 Stage 1 - - - - 724 - Stage 2 - - - - 721 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1222 - 418 706Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 418 - Stage 1 - - - - 724 - Stage 2 - - - - 720 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 11.89HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 525 - - 8 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.9 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 90 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 226 3 1 203 4 3Future Vol, veh/h 226 3 1 203 4 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 328 4 1 294 6 4Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 332 0 627 330 Stage 1 - - - - 330 - Stage 2 - - - - 297 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1228 - 447 712 Stage 1 - - - - 729 - Stage 2 - - - - 754 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1228 - 447 712Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 447 - Stage 1 - - - - 729 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.04 11.9HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 532 - - 9 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.9 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 91 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 39 117 73 40 95 5 73 26 18 1 28 37Future Volume (veh/h) 39 117 73 40 95 5 73 26 18 1 28 37Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 165 103 56 134 7 103 37 25 1 39 52Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 445 673 570 402 275 14 525 369 249 120 215 186Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.35 0.350.12 0.12 0.12Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1111 1762 92 1781 1041 703 26 1834 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 165 103 56 0 141 103 0 62 40 0 52Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1111 0 1854 1781 0 1744 1860 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 2.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 2.2 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 2.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 2.2 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.60.0 0.9Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.40 0.02 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 445 673 570 402 0 289 525 0 618 336 0 186V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.25 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.49 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.12 0.00 0.28Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 619 1633 1384 864 0 1060 645 0 1578 1230 0 951HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.7 7.1 6.9 11.8 0.0 12.1 8.9 0.0 6.8 12.5 0.0 12.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.8Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.20.2 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.8 7.3 7.1 12.0 0.0 13.4 9.1 0.0 6.9 12.7 0.0 13.5LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 323 197 165 92Approach Delay, s/veh 7.5 13.0 8.2 13.1Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 15.8 7.5 8.2 6.4 9.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.1 18.9 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 4.0 3.4 2.9 2.7 4.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.7HCM 7th LOS ANotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 92 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM 13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 10 6 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 16 6 6 0 - 0 Stage 1 6 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1003 - - - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1615 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 93 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 7 168 38 28 198 16 59 36 47 24 49 34Future Volume (veh/h) 7 168 38 28 198 16 59 36 47 24 49 34Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 240 54 40 283 23 84 51 67 34 70 49Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 614 812 179 617 934 75 392 116 117 343 328 378Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1073 2893 639 1085 3330 269 503 485 491 370 1373 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 146 148 40 150 156 202 0 0 104 0 49Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1073 1777 1755 1085 1777 1822 1479 0 0 1743 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 1.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.80.0 0.5Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.15 0.42 0.33 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 614 498 492 617 498 511 625 0 0 671 0 378V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.29 0.30 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.13Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1374 1757 1735 1385 1757 1801 1902 0 02061 0 1736HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.8 5.3 5.3 6.0 5.3 5.3 6.3 0.0 0.05.7 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.9 5.6 5.6 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.6 0.0 0.0 5.90.0 5.8LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 304 346 202 153Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 5.7 6.6 5.8Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 9.7 9.0 9.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.4 2.8 3.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 1.5 0.6 1.6Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.9HCM 7th LOS APage 94 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 223 1 6 227 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Future Vol, veh/h 6 223 1 6 227 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 305 1 8 311 10 4 3 1 21 5 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 321 0 0 307 0 0 653 660 306 655 655 316 Stage 1 - - - - - - 323 323 - 332 332 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 330 337 - 323 323 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1239 - - 1254 - - 381 383 734 379 385 725 Stage 1 - - - - - - 689 651 - 681 644 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 683 641 - 689 650 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1239 - - 1254 - - 359 377 734 370 379 725Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 359 377 - 370 379 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 684 645 - 676 639 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 654 636 - 679 645 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.2 14.19 13.5HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 400 47 - - 45 - - 468HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.007 - - 0.007 - - 0.096HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.2 7.9 0 - 7.9 0 - 13.5HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3Page 95 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build 9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 240 1 1 241 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 240 1 1 241 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 343 1 1 344 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 344 0 691 344 Stage 1 - - - - 344 - Stage 2 - - - - 347 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1215 - 411 699 Stage 1 - - - - 718 - Stage 2 - - - - 715 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1215 - 410 699Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 410 - Stage 1 - - - - 718 - Stage 2 - - - - 714 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 12HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 517 - - 7 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12 - - 8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 96 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 231 3 1 207 4 3Future Vol, veh/h 231 3 1 207 4 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 335 4 1 300 6 4Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 339 0 640 337 Stage 1 - - - - 337 - Stage 2 - - - - 303 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 440 705 Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 749 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 439 705Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 439 - Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 748 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.04 12.01HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 524 - - 9 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12 - - 8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 97 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 119 74 41 97 5 74 241 18 1 29 38Future Volume (veh/h) 40 119 74 41 97 5 74 241 18 1 29 38Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 168 104 58 137 7 104 339 25 1 41 54Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 428 655 555 387 271 14 551 650 48 114 273 236Arrive On Green 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.38 0.380.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1107 1764 90 1781 1721 127 19 1835 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 168 104 58 0 144 104 0 364 42 0 54Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1107 0 1854 1781 0 1848 1854 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 2.1 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.4 1.4 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 1.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 2.1 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.4 1.4 0.0 5.1 0.60.0 1.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.07 0.02 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 428 655 555 387 0 284 551 0 698 387 0 236V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.26 0.19 0.15 0.00 0.51 0.19 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.00 0.23Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 589 1554 1317 820 0 1009 671 0 1591 1151 0 896HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.3 7.7 7.5 12.5 0.0 12.9 8.7 0.0 8.0 12.3 0.0 12.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.5Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 1.40.2 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.4 7.9 7.6 12.7 0.0 14.3 8.8 0.0 8.6 12.4 0.0 12.9LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 328 202 468 96Approach Delay, s/veh 8.1 13.8 8.6 12.7Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 16.1 7.6 9.4 6.5 9.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.3 18.7 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 4.1 3.4 3.0 2.8 4.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.8HCM 7th LOS ANotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 98 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build 13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 10 6 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 16 6 6 0 - 0 Stage 1 6 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1003 - - - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1615 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 99 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 7 218 38 30 203 16 59 36 60 24 49 34Future Volume (veh/h) 7 218 38 30 203 16 59 36 60 24 49 34Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 311 54 43 290 23 84 51 86 34 70 49Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 610 900 155 585 991 78 367 116 147 329 341 390Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.250.25 0.25 0.25Sat Flow, veh/h 1067 3033 521 1017 3337 263 467 473 599 350 1386 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 181 184 43 154 159 221 0 0 104 0 49Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1067 1777 1777 1017 1777 1823 1538 0 0 1736 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 1.6 1.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.3 1.3 1.3 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.90.0 0.5Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.14 0.38 0.39 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 610 528 527 585 528 541 631 0 0 670 0 390V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.34 0.35 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.13Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1296 1669 1669 1238 1669 1712 1822 0 01950 0 1650HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.9 5.4 5.4 6.3 5.3 5.3 6.5 0.0 0.05.9 0.0 5.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.00.2 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.4 5.6 5.6 6.8 0.0 0.0 6.00.0 5.9LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 375 356 221 153Approach Delay, s/veh 5.8 5.7 6.8 6.0Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 10.3 9.3 10.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 3.6 2.9 4.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 1.9 0.6 1.7Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.0HCM 7th LOS APage 100 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 286 1 6 234 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Future Vol, veh/h 6 286 1 6 234 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 392 1 8 321 10 4 3 1 21 5 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 330 0 0 393 0 0 749 755 392 751 751 325 Stage 1 - - - - - - 409 409 - 342 342 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 340 347 - 410 410 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1229 - - 1165 - - 328 338 656 327 339 716 Stage 1 - - - - - - 619 596 - 673 638 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 675 635 - 619 596 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1229 - - 1165 - - 309 332 656 318 334 716Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 309 332 - 318 334 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 614 591 - 667 633 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 646 630 - 609 591 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.16 0.2 15.61 14.62HCM LOS C BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 348 37 - - 43 - - 419HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.007 - - 0.007 - - 0.108HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.6 7.9 0 - 8.1 0 - 14.6HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.4Page 101 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build 9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.6Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 240 63 32 241 4 4Future Vol, veh/h 240 63 32 241 4 4Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 343 90 46 344 6 6Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 433 0 824 388 Stage 1 - - - - 388 - Stage 2 - - - - 436 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1127 - 343 660 Stage 1 - - - - 686 - Stage 2 - - - - 652 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1127 - 326 660Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 326 - Stage 1 - - - - 686 - Stage 2 - - - - 619 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.98 13.47HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 436 - - 211 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.041 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.5 - - 8.3 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -Page 102 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.8Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 234 3 32 238 7 6Future Vol, veh/h 234 3 32 238 7 6Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 339 4 46 345 10 9Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 343 0 779 341 Stage 1 - - - - 341 - Stage 2 - - - - 438 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 364 701 Stage 1 - - - - 720 - Stage 2 - - - - 651 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 347 701Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 347 - Stage 1 - - - - 720 - Stage 2 - - - - 620 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.96 13.3HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 453 - - 213 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - 0.038 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.3 - - 8.1 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -Page 103 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 124 75 41 147 5 86 241 18 1 29 38Future Volume (veh/h) 40 124 75 41 147 5 86 241 18 1 29 38Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 175 106 58 207 7 121 339 25 1 41 54Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 412 710 601 415 346 12 536 629 46 107 257 222Arrive On Green 0.06 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.37 0.370.14 0.14 0.14Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1098 1799 61 1781 1721 127 19 1835 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 175 106 58 0 214 121 0 364 42 0 54Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1098 0 1859 1781 0 1848 1854 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 2.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 3.7 1.8 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 1.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 2.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 3.7 1.8 0.0 5.5 0.70.0 1.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.07 0.02 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 412 710 601 415 0 357 536 0 676 364 0 222V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.25 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.60 0.23 0.00 0.54 0.12 0.00 0.24Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 558 1456 1234 764 0 948 638 0 1491 10680 830HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.2 7.5 7.3 12.2 0.0 13.0 9.5 0.0 8.8 13.4 0.0 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.6Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.4 0.5 0.0 1.60.3 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.3 7.7 7.4 12.3 0.0 14.6 9.7 0.0 9.5 13.5 0.0 14.1LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 337 272 485 96Approach Delay, s/veh 7.9 14.1 9.6 13.8Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.4 17.9 8.0 9.4 6.6 11.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.5 18.5 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 4.3 3.8 3.1 2.8 5.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.5HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 104 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build 13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.6Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 7 4 31Future Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 7 4 31Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 10 6 44Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 38 28 50 0 - 0 Stage 1 28 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1047 1557 - - - Stage 1 995 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1047 1557 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 974 - - - - - Stage 1 995 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.71 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1557 - 974 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.7 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - -Page 105 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 11 AM-12 PM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 165 43 41 311 33 72 74 51 40 55 27Future Volume (veh/h) 20 165 43 41 311 33 72 74 51 40 55 27Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 177 46 44 334 35 77 80 55 43 59 29Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 589 803 203 657 929 97 369 164 95 388 286 374Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1013 2808 711 1158 3248 338 459 695 405 491 1213 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 110 113 44 182 187 212 0 0 102 0 29Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1013 1777 1742 1158 1777 1810 1559 0 0 1704 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.5 1.6 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.80.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.19 0.36 0.26 0.42 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 589 508 498 657 508 518 628 0 0 674 0 374V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.22 0.23 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1295 1746 1713 1463 1746 1779 1956 0 01996 0 1726HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 5.1 5.1 5.7 5.3 5.4 6.3 0.0 0.05.8 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.1 5.3 5.4 5.7 5.8 5.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.90.0 5.7LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 245 413 212 131Approach Delay, s/veh 5.4 5.8 6.7 5.9Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 9.9 8.9 9.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.9 2.8 3.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.1 0.5 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.9HCM 7th LOS APage 106 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 259 1 2 345 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Future Vol, veh/h 7 259 1 2 345 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 278 1 2 371 1 6 6 2 14 3 17Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 372 0 0 280 0 0 671 670 279 673 670 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 294 294 - 376 376 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 377 376 - 297 295 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1186 - - 1283 - - 370 378 760 369 378 674 Stage 1 - - - - - - 714 670 - 645 617 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 645 616 - 712 669 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1186 - - 1283 - - 354 374 760 358 374 674Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 354 374 - 358 374 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 709 665 - 644 615 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 624 615 - 698 664 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.04 14.52 13.25HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 393 47 - - 10 - - 470HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.006 - - 0.002 - - 0.073HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.5 8.1 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.3HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2Page 107 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 278 1 1 364 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 278 1 1 364 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 302 1 1 396 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 303 0 701 303 Stage 1 - - - - 303 - Stage 2 - - - - 398 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1258 - 405 737 Stage 1 - - - - 749 - Stage 2 - - - - 679 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1258 - 405 737Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 405 - Stage 1 - - - - 749 - Stage 2 - - - - 678 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.02 12.97HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 456 - - 5 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 108 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 251 3 2 331 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 251 3 2 331 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 270 3 2 356 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 273 0 632 272 Stage 1 - - - - 272 - Stage 2 - - - - 360 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1290 - 445 767 Stage 1 - - - - 774 - Stage 2 - - - - 706 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1290 - 444 767Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 444 - Stage 1 - - - - 774 - Stage 2 - - - - 704 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.05 12.32HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 496 - - 11 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.3 - - 7.8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 109 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 11 AM-12 PM 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 52 84 116 57 143 18 126 40 26 13 41 61Future Volume (veh/h) 52 84 116 57 143 18 126 40 26 13 41 61Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 90 125 61 154 19 135 43 28 14 44 66Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 425 684 580 414 279 34 529 387 252 167 186 198Arrive On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.37 0.370.12 0.12 0.12Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1166 1633 201 1781 1058 689 272 1487 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 90 125 61 0 173 135 0 71 58 0 66Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1166 0 1834 1781 0 1746 1759 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.1 1.8 1.5 0.0 2.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.1 1.8 1.5 0.0 2.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 0.90.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.39 0.24 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 684 580 414 0 313 529 0 639 353 0 198V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.55 0.26 0.00 0.11 0.16 0.00 0.33Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 583 1534 1300 841 0 985 642 0 1485 10700 865HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.1 7.1 7.3 12.2 0.0 12.7 9.3 0.0 7.0 13.2 0.0 13.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.20.3 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.2 7.2 7.5 12.3 0.0 14.2 9.5 0.0 7.1 13.5 0.0 14.4LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 271 234 206 124Approach Delay, s/veh 7.7 13.7 8.7 13.9Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.8 16.8 8.1 8.7 6.5 10.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 3.8 3.9 3.3 2.8 4.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.6HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 110 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 3 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 9 3 3 0 - 0 Stage 1 3 - - - - - Stage 2 5 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1012 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1619 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 111 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 168 44 42 317 34 73 75 52 41 56 28Future Volume (veh/h) 20 168 44 42 317 34 73 75 52 41 56 28Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 181 47 45 341 37 78 81 56 44 60 30Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 584 813 206 654 936 101 367 166 97 385 289 377Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1005 2808 711 1153 3236 349 458 699 407 489 1213 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 113 115 45 186 192 215 0 0 104 0 30Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1005 1777 1742 1153 1777 1808 1564 0 0 1703 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.9 1.0 0.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.90.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.19 0.36 0.26 0.42 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 584 514 504 654 514 523 630 0 0 674 0 377V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.22 0.23 0.07 0.36 0.37 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1270 1726 1693 1440 1726 1756 1933 0 01972 0 1706HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 5.1 5.1 5.7 5.4 5.4 6.4 0.0 0.05.9 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.2 5.3 5.4 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.00.0 5.7LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 250 423 215 134Approach Delay, s/veh 5.4 5.8 6.7 5.9Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 10.0 9.0 10.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.9 2.9 3.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.1 0.5 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.9HCM 7th LOS APage 112 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 264 1 2 352 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Future Vol, veh/h 7 264 1 2 352 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 284 1 2 378 1 6 6 2 14 3 17Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 380 0 0 285 0 0 684 683 284 685 683 379 Stage 1 - - - - - - 299 299 - 383 383 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 384 384 - 302 300 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1179 - - 1277 - - 363 371 755 362 371 668 Stage 1 - - - - - - 709 666 - 639 612 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 639 611 - 707 666 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1179 - - 1277 - - 347 368 755 351 368 668Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 347 368 - 351 368 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 704 661 - 638 611 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 618 610 - 693 661 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.04 14.7 13.4HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 386 46 - - 10 - - 463HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.006 - - 0.002 - - 0.074HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.7 8.1 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.4HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2Page 113 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 284 1 1 371 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 284 1 1 371 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 309 1 1 403 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 310 0 715 309 Stage 1 - - - - 309 - Stage 2 - - - - 405 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 398 731 Stage 1 - - - - 744 - Stage 2 - - - - 673 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 397 731Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 397 - Stage 1 - - - - 744 - Stage 2 - - - - 672 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.02 13.11HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 448 - - 5 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.1 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 114 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 256 3 2 338 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 256 3 2 338 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 275 3 2 363 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 278 0 645 277 Stage 1 - - - - 277 - Stage 2 - - - - 368 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1284 - 437 762 Stage 1 - - - - 770 - Stage 2 - - - - 700 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1284 - 436 762Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 436 - Stage 1 - - - - 770 - Stage 2 - - - - 699 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.05 12.44HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 488 - - 11 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.4 - - 7.8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 115 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Future Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 92 127 62 157 19 139 44 29 14 45 67Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 425 687 582 414 282 34 529 385 254 165 187 198Arrive On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.37 0.370.13 0.13 0.13Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1162 1637 198 1781 1052 693 267 1495 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 92 127 62 0 176 139 0 73 59 0 67Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1162 0 1835 1781 0 1746 1761 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.6 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.6 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.9 1.00.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.40 0.24 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 687 582 414 0 316 529 0 639 352 0 198V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.56 0.26 0.00 0.11 0.17 0.00 0.34Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 579 1524 1291 833 0 978 638 0 1474 10630 859HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.1 7.1 7.4 12.2 0.0 12.8 9.3 0.0 7.1 13.3 0.0 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.20.3 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.2 7.2 7.5 12.4 0.0 14.3 9.6 0.0 7.2 13.6 0.0 14.5LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 276 238 212 126Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 13.8 8.7 14.1Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.9 16.9 8.1 8.7 6.6 10.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 3.9 4.0 3.3 2.8 5.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.6HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 116 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 3 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 9 3 3 0 - 0 Stage 1 3 - - - - - Stage 2 5 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1012 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1619 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 117 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 173 44 54 367 34 73 75 54 41 56 28Future Volume (veh/h) 20 173 44 54 367 34 73 75 54 41 56 28Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 186 47 58 395 37 78 81 58 44 60 30Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 569 879 217 662 1023 95 353 166 99 372 288 375Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 956 2825 697 1147 3286 306 452 701 421 483 1220 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 115 118 58 213 219 217 0 0 104 0 30Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 956 1777 1745 1147 1777 1815 15750 0 1703 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.9 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.90.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.17 0.36 0.27 0.42 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 569 553 543 662 553 565 618 0 0 660 0 375V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.21 0.22 0.09 0.38 0.39 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1161 1653 1623 1372 1653 1688 1853 0 01888 0 1634HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 5.0 5.1 5.7 5.4 5.4 6.7 0.0 0.06.1 0.0 5.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.00.2 0.0 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.3 5.2 5.3 5.8 5.8 5.8 7.0 0.0 0.0 6.30.0 6.0LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 255 490 217 134Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 5.8 7.0 6.2Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 10.7 9.2 10.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 4.2 2.9 3.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.2 0.5 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.0HCM 7th LOS APage 118 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 271 1 2 414 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Future Vol, veh/h 7 271 1 2 414 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 291 1 2 445 1 6 6 2 14 3 17Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 446 0 0 292 0 0 758 758 292 760 758 446 Stage 1 - - - - - - 307 307 - 450 450 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 451 451 - 310 308 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1114 - - 1269 - - 323 337 747 323 337 613 Stage 1 - - - - - - 703 661 - 589 572 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 588 571 - 701 661 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1114 - - 1269 - - 308 333 747 312 333 613Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 308 333 - 312 333 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 697 656 - 587 570 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 570 - 686 655 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.04 15.79 14.41HCM LOS C BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 349 45 - - 9 - - 417HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 0.007 - - 0.002 - - 0.083HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.8 8.3 0 - 7.8 0 - 14.4HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3Page 119 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 284 7 3 402 34 31Future Vol, veh/h 284 7 3 402 34 31Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 309 8 3 437 37 34Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 316 0 756 312 Stage 1 - - - - 312 - Stage 2 - - - - 443 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 376 728 Stage 1 - - - - 742 - Stage 2 - - - - 647 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 375 728Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 375 - Stage 1 - - - - 742 - Stage 2 - - - - 645 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.06 13.63HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 487 - - 13 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.145 - - 0.003 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.6 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0 -Page 120 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.3Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 287 3 5 341 34 31Future Vol, veh/h 287 3 5 341 34 31Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 319 3 6 379 38 34Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 322 0 711 321 Stage 1 - - - - 321 - Stage 2 - - - - 390 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1238 - 400 720 Stage 1 - - - - 736 - Stage 2 - - - - 684 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1238 - 397 720Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 397 - Stage 1 - - - - 736 - Stage 2 - - - - 680 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.11 13.3HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 506 - - 26 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.143 - - 0.004 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.3 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0 -Page 121 of 129 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Future Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 59 96 131 64 162 20 143 46 30 14 47 69Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 425 693 587 414 287 35 527 387 252 162 190 199Arrive On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.37 0.370.13 0.13 0.13Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1154 1633 202 1781 1057 689 256 1508 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 96 131 64 0 182 143 0 76 61 0 69Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1154 0 1834 1781 0 1746 1764 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.2 1.9 1.7 0.0 3.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.2 1.9 1.7 0.0 3.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 1.00.0 1.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.39 0.23 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 693 587 414 0 323 527 0 639 351 0 199V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.56 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.35Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 574 1506 1276 819 0 967 631 0 1457 10520 849HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.1 7.1 7.4 12.3 0.0 12.9 9.4 0.0 7.2 13.5 0.0 13.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.30.4 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.3 7.2 7.6 12.5 0.0 14.4 9.7 0.0 7.3 13.7 0.0 14.7LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 286 246 219 130Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 13.9 8.9 14.2Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 17.2 8.2 8.8 6.6 10.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 3.9 4.1 3.4 2.8 5.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.7HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 122 of 129 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 7.5Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 62 0 0 5 3 3Future Vol, veh/h 62 0 0 5 3 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 67 0 0 5 3 3Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 10 5 6 0 - 0 Stage 1 5 - - - - - Stage 2 5 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 1078 1614 - - - Stage 1 1018 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 1078 1614 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1010 - - - - - Stage 1 1018 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.82 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1614 - 1010 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.066 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.8 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - -Page 123 of 129 EdinaMN.gov 4201 W 50th Street West Conditional Use Permit with Variances EdinaMN.gov Page 124 of 129 Existing Page 125 of 129 Survey Page 126 of 129 Page 127 of 129 Page 128 of 129 Staff Recommendation Staff recommend approval of the requested conditional use permit and associated variances. Approval is based on the following findings: •The proposed use meets all conditions to grant a conditional use permit. •The project does not have an undue adverse impact on government facilities, utilities, or services. •The proposed project will have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. •The project does not have an undue adverse impact on public health, safety or welfare. •The project will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. •The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. •The application meets the variance criteria for the parking variance and lot size variance. •The application allows the property owner to continue the use of the property as it has been used since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. The size of the lot, the proposed uses, and the number of parking spaces are not changing. •The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: •The property owner is required to develop a parking plan that identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site during a maximum occupancy event. •The property owner is required to submit a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan. Page 129 of 129