Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-12-08 City Council Meeting Packet Meeting location: Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN City Council Meeting Agenda Monday, December 8, 2025 6:00 PM Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535- 8110. Enter access code 2633 585 6275. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn to speak. Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927- 8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval of Meeting Agenda 5. Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 5.1. PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-118 West 72nd Street Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. SS-538 5.2. PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-116 Prospect Knolls A, C & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-458 5.3. PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-117 Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-467 6. Manager's Comments 7. Mayor and Council Comments Page 1 of 668 8. Adjournment Page 2 of 668 d ITEM REPORT Date: December 8, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 5.1 Prepared By: Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Engineering Item Title: PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-118 West 72nd Street Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. SS-538 Action Requested: Motion to close the in person public hearing, keep the online public input open until noon, December 10, and continue action on the item to the December 16 City Council meeting Information/Background: Staff initiated this project. Staff proposes to reconstruct West 72nd Street from Cornelia Drive to France Avenue. Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. Between November 26, when public hearing notices were mailed, and December 3, when this public hearing document agenda item was submitted for the December 8 City Council packet, 1 comment was received on BetterTogetherEdina.org. Public hearing input closes at noon on December 10. Resources/Financial Impacts: The overall project cost is estimated at $6,400,000. Funding will be a combination of special assessments, City Utility and Pedestrian and Cyclists Safety (PACS) funds, and property taxes. Relationship to City Policies: The project includes CIP No. ENG21055 Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Replacing aging infrastructure at the appropriate time is sound asset management practice. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2026 Street Reconstruction Public Improvement Hearing Staff Presentation 2. Engineering Study SS-538 Page 3 of 668 3. Certificate of Mailing 4. Better Together Report of Comments Received 5. Resolution No. 2025-118 W 72nd Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. SS-538 Page 4 of 668 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Public Improvement Hearings December 8, 2025 Page 5 of 668 Agenda •Thank You –Residents and Council •Infrastructure Spending •Project Similarities •Multimodal Information Sharing •West 72nd Street •Prospect Knolls A, C & D •Parklawn Court Blake Road Fall 2023 Page 6 of 668 Infrastructure Spending •Budget Work Plan – Pillar #1 Strong Foundation •Infrastructure meets community needs now and in the future •Multi-Modal Transportation Network – Roads, Sidewalks, Bicycle Facilities, Mass Transit •Clean & Safe Drinking Water – Water Treatment Plants, Distribution Networks. •Sanitation – Sanitary Sewer, Wastewater •Flood Protection - Storm Sewer, Lakes, Ponds Page 7 of 668 Pavement Condition Index - Citywide Page 8 of 668 Pavement Condition Index https://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/ Page 9 of 668 Page 10 of 668 Infrastructure Asset Management Page 11 of 668 Build-outInfrastructure DividendsCommitment to ReinvestMaintenance GenerationInfrastructure Asset Management Page 12 of 668 2026 Project Areas •West 72 nd Street •Local Street •20 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •Local Streets •283 Properties •Parklawn Court •Local Street •4 Properties Page 13 of 668 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility information •Bike and ped system needs & gaps Page 14 of 668 Proposed Watermain Improvements •Replace water services project wide •Replace hydrants and gate valves project wide •Replace partial watermain •Verify appropriate hydrant spacing and add hydrants if needed to meet public safety standards •Paid for under watermain fund Page 15 of 668 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements •Spot trunk pipe repairs and cured- in-place pipe liners to reduce I&I •Replace manhole castings and rings •Paid for from sanitary sewer fund Page 16 of 668 Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements •Modifications to roadway and storm sewer to improve existing drainage issues •Replace curb and gutter •Install sump drain pipe where feasible •Paid for by the storm sewer fund Page 17 of 668 Right-of-Way Impacts •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Sod Restoration Page 18 of 668 Project Schedules Neighborhood Informational Video Presentation Various *City Council Rejects Prospect Knolls A 2020 Project January 7, 2020 Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Public Hearing Opens / Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Public Hearing Closes December 10, 2025 Public Hearing Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract / Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 Page 19 of 668 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements. Adjacent properties. •2021 Policy Change •Transition to taxes over 16 year •Covers 52.6% of roadway costs Construction Year % of Local Roadway Costs Assessed 2020 100% 2021-2024 78.90%-63.12% 2025 57.86% 2026 52.60% 2027-2035 47.34%-5.26% 2036 0% Page 20 of 668 Special Assessments •Covers 52.6% of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Gravel base •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings •Remainder of roadway costs are covered by property taxes Page 21 of 668 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence * Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties Scenario Land Use Class REU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 C Multi-Family Residential – Apartment/Condos 0.5 Page 22 of 668 19 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 23 of 668 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2025 interest rate was 4.98% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 24 of 668 Strategic Guidance •Comprehensive Plan •Race and Equity Plan •Climate Action Plan •Living Streets Plan •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan •Active Routes to School Plan Approved Plans Budget Pillars Page 25 of 668 Guiding Objectives Meet the needs of all users and abilities Provide connectivity for everyday uses Improve safety and comfort Encourage alternative transportation Page 26 of 668 Quality of Life Survey 2025 •Most liked attribute of living in Edina: Convenient location/accessibility/ walkability - 45% •Ease of travel (% excellent or good):•Overall – 84•By Car – 79•Walking – 70•Biking – 61 •Quality of city services (% excellent or good):•Condition of trails and sidewalks – 87•Sidewalk maintenance – 77 •Importance of transportation emission reduction actions such as sidewalks, bike lanes, public EV charging (% essential or very important) – 69 Page 27 of 668 Safe & Equitable Mobility Action Plan •Aimed at reducing fatal and serious injury crashes for all road users •Key themes of Phase 1 community engagement: •Streets without sidewalks increase risk for vulnerable users •Desire for safer connections to parks, transit and commercial areas, especially for children and elderly residents •Interest in physical design solutions to address vehicle speeds •Delays in sidewalk implementation have long-term impacts on health and mobility Page 28 of 668 Proposed Improvements Meet the needs of all users and abilities Provide connectivity for everyday usesImprove safety and comfort Encourage alternative transportation Page 29 of 668 EdinaMN.gov West 72 nd Street Roadway Reconstruction SS-538 Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Page 30 of 668 South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements 72nd Street Oaklawn Avenue Gilford Drive Kellogg Avenue Hibiscus Avenue GOAL: Pipes need maintenance & prepare for future needs. Page 31 of 668 72nd Street –Opportunity to Reconstruct •Lots of comments about traffic speed, volumes, and behaviors. •Concerns about development project at 7200 & 7250 France. •Presentation to City Council related to traffic. •Staff report posted to BetterTogetherEdina.org •Heard from a survey –parking not a priority of most. Page 32 of 668 Project Details –W. 72 nd Street •20 properties (55.25 REUs) •0.33 miles of road •7200 France 70% of REU’s •7128 France 21% of REU’s •Previous assessments Page 33 of 668 Proposed Utility Improvements –Open Cut Method •Install 36” sanitary sewer pipe on 72nd Street from Cornelia Dr to east side of France Ave •Replace 6” watermain from Cornelia Dr to Lynmar Ln & consider additional loop •All GV’s, hydrants and water services •Storm sewer most likely replaced Page 34 of 668 Existing Roadways Conditions •Street originally constructed 1961 •Existing concrete street width is 28-ft Page 35 of 668 Roadway Typical Section •Existing •28’ road width •No parking either side •Existing sidewalk north side •Proposed •24’ road width •Reduce street widths by 4’ •No parking either side (resident survey) •Add 8’ sidewalk / shared use path south side (resident comments) Page 36 of 668 Roadway Typical Section •Tree planted median west of Lynmar Ln •resident suggestion for traffic calming •Right-in right-out of 7200 France Page 37 of 668 Transportation Commission Review •Support proposed road narrowing, sidewalk / shared use path on south side and median on 72nd Street for traffic calming and pedestrian safety. •Asked about future projects in the neighborhood as it relates to the Bike Ped Master Plan. Page 38 of 668 Estimated Project Costs *Includes concrete curb and gutter •Engineering, clerical, finance costs and contingency included Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway $313,000 Special Assessments Roadway $282,000 Property Taxes Roadway Total:$595,000 Sanitary Sewer $4,200,000 Watermain $850,000 Storm Sewer *$555,000 Utility Total:$5,605,000 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total:$200,000 PACS Fund Project Total:$6,400,000 Page 39 of 668 Estimated Roadway Assessments •20 properties (55.25 REUs) - 1 REU per single-family home - 0.5 REU for corner properties •$313,000 / 55.25 REUs = $6,000 per REU •Based on assessment policy, 91% of the cost is allocated to 7128 & 7200 France. •City assessed 1.5 REU’s. Page 40 of 668 Recommendation •Reminder - Approving Pedestrian Improvements requires a minimum of 3 out of 5 Council votes in favor to pass •Staff believes this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure •Motion to close the public hearing at noon, December 10,and to continue action on the item to the December 16 City Council meeting. (Improvement No. SS-538) Page 41 of 668 Thank you for your time! Page 42 of 668 ENGINEERING STUDY WEST 72nd STREET ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Cornelia Drive to France Avenue IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-538 NOVEMBER 25, 2025 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43970 11/25/2025 Chad Millner Reg. No. Date Page 43 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of a local concrete street, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, construction of new shared-use path, replacement of sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $6,400,000. 47.40% of the roadway cost will be funded through property taxes and 52.60% will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $6,000 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $5,605,000 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Multi-modal improvements are estimated to cost $200,000 and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure” and the “Strong Foundations” City budget pillar. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. LOCATION: The project includes 72nd Street from Cornelia Drive to France Avenue including under France Avenue. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Page 44 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways 72nd Street was originally constructed in 1961. Various concrete panels have been replaced over the years, but no maintenance has been performed over the entire street. 72nd Street, as a concrete street, has integral curb. The roadway width is 28’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 5” to 6.5” of concrete pavement over an apparent aggregate base followed by a combination of silty sand and sand with silt soils. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc. for bituminous streets; popouts, longitudinal and transverse cracking, potholes, etc. for concrete streets). The average PCI for the City of Edina is 78 and the average PCI for 72nd Street is 56. Traffic and Crash Data Staff measured traffic volumes and speeds along 72nd Street within the project area in 2025. Average daily traffic volumes range between 1,552 and 1,926 vehicles per day. While the posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour, 85th-percentile speeds range from 29.5 to 32.7 miles per hour. According to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, only one crash has been reported within the project area in the last 10 years. Traffic data for this project is shown in Appendix A. The traffic signs are shown in Appendix E. Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There is a sidewalk along the north side of 72nd Street within the project area (see Appendix B). There are also sidewalks adjacent to the project area along Claremore Drive, Oaklawn Avenue, Cornelia Drive and France Avenue. Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area. The project area is less than ¼ mile (or a 1-minute bike ride) from the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (see Appendix C). Transit Facilities There are no transit facilities within the project area. Metro Transit’s Local Routes 6 and 537 operate within 1/3 mile of the project area on France Avenue. Most of the bus stops adjacent to the project area are accessible by sidewalks; none have shelters. 72nd St is also within the service area of the City’s CloverRide circulator bus service. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer 72nd Street has one 24” reinforced concrete sanitary sewer main pipe (RCP), installed in 1957. Page 45 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 4 Watermain 72nd Street has 6” cast iron watermain pipe (CIP) and ductile iron watermain pipe (DIP), installed in the 1950’s. The watermain has experienced 2 breaks (see Appendix D). The hydrants are original to the neighborhood. The existing watermain pipe wall was scanned to determine pipe wall thickness loss. The pipe wall loss of the existing pipes ranges from 4% to 30%. Based on Utility Billing records, there are no properties in the project area that rely on private wells for domestic water. Storm Sewer 72nd Street drains overland into drainage structures from Lynmar Lane to Oaklawn Avenue. The flow is piped west, eventually to Lake Edina. The intersection at France Avenue is collected and piped east towards Centennial Lakes. The reinforced concrete pipes (RCP) were installed in 1950’s, and are in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present along 72nd Street. These utilities are a combination of overhead facilities located in backyards and underground utilities along the boulevards. Street lights are located at the intersections and are owned and maintained by Xcel Energy. There is a combination of cobra head fixtures on wood power poles and standalone traditional fixtures on wood poles. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendices B and C, there are no proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, Page 46 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 5 seniors and people with disabilities. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges, and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. Water Resource Management Plan (December 2022 Amendment) Municipal stormwater systems provide multiple functions, including runoff management (removal of stormwater) and flood risk reduction. The system is composed of structural or engineered control devices and facilities to treat, convey, or store polluted stormwater. Enhancing public infrastructure by building new, retrofitting old, and maintaining existing in working condition is a key action to reducing flood exposure. City Council adopted the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy in 2020, and it was incorporated into the Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) by major amendment. The primary goal for the City’s flood risk reduction effort is to improve public safety and reduce the exposure of private principal structures to flooding. It is the City’s standard practice to provide a 10-percent-annual-chance level of service and 1-percent-annual-chance level (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency events, respectively) of protection for principal structures for the City’s stormwater conveyance systems, where feasible. The WRMP identified flood flow paths and flood pool areas along 72nd Street and nearby cross streets. The outlet pipe from Lake Cornelia, a major flow path flows from Cornelia Dr west along 72nd street and then continues south on Oaklawn Ave. Page 47 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 6 Figure 2: 72nd Street Floodzones (LE_15, 16, 18, 21, CL_57) There are no structures exposed from flood waters in or adjacent to this street corridor, but overflow from the corridor may contribute to exposure on areas outside the map. To reduce this potential for overflow, the intersection elevations of Cornelia Drive and Gloucester Dr, south of the 72nd should be checked so flow or inundation of 0.5’ flows east and west, and does not overflow south. Similarly, Heatherton Rd on the north elevation should be checked so 72nd does not overflow to the north. The major drainage area pipe flow from Lake Cornelia should be reviewed and upsized in the project area to coordinate with future upgrades on Cornelia Dr and Oaklawn Rd both north and south, respectively. Climate Action Plan The CAP identified the following strategies that align with this roadway reconstruction project. Transportation and Land Use (TL) 1: Decrease community-wide vehicle miles traveled by 7% by 2030. Action TL 1-2: Accelerate building on-street and off-street protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas and fill connectivity gaps as identified in the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. TL 2: Double public transit commuter ridership from 3.3% to 6.6% by 2030. Adjacent Redevelopment A six-story office building and a six-story, 153-unit apartment building are currently under construction at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue, respectively. The approved site plan includes a new 5’ sidewalk on the south side of 72nd Street between Lynmar Lane and France Avenue, and access road between 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive, and a new 10’ shared-use path between 72nd St and Gallagher Drive. The City is also studying the possibility of a new pedestrian and bicycle crossing of France Avenue between 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive. Public Works Page 48 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 7 A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They support replacement of concrete curb and gutter, as well as replacement of deficient or undersized utility systems. Including an additional watermain loop was noted and is being reviewed for addition into the project. Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements, including adding fire hydrants as necessary to meet public safety standards. They noted that temporary fire hydrants should meet the fire code and be consistent in style for ease of access, that emergency access should always be maintained during construction and that drive widths and turnarounds should meet local design guidelines. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 23, 2025, a draft engineering study was provided for review. Commissioners expressed support for the proposed multi-modal and traffic calming improvements and noted that the multi-year project will be disruptive to adjacent property owners. They also inquired about coordinating the proposed improvements with the redevelopment of 7250 France Avenue. Commissioners requested consideration for additional traffic calming measures, and consideration to include the proposed bike boulevard on Wooddale Avenue, Gilford Drive, and Kellogg Avenue as part of the project scope. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix G. Residents Residents were invited to two open houses on July 28 and August 4, 2025, respectively. Residents were able to directly ask questions to staff. The meetings also had virtual options and recorded both meetings. Materials can be found at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/south-trunk-sanitary-sewer. Residents were asked to complete two questionnaires, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation & the importance of various factors related to deep sanitary sewer construction. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix H. Feedback from a separate questionnaire showed that parking on 72nd Street is not a major priority, as nearby streets can provide sufficient parking options.. Those responses led staff to install no parking signs and shoulder striping on both sides of the street along 72nd Street from Lynmar Ln to Cornelia Dr in 2025. This led to 11- foot lane widths and a reduction in speeds of 3 mph. Staff received many comments during the open houses and via email to City Council about traffic speed, volume and behaviors. We also heard concerns about pedestrian safety with the current conditions. Page 49 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 8 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. The proposed improvements also align with the Budget Work Plan values and goals developed by the City Council and staff. Roadways Typical Section The concrete roadway is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. A minimum of 8” of aggregate base material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous non-wear and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. 72nd Street is designated as a Local Connector in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Connectors have a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) with parking allowed on one side. A sidewalk is required on at least one side of the street, and bicycle facilities are optional. 72nd Street is proposed to be 24’ wide, which is the minimum width recommended for Local Connectors. It will also include a tree-landscaped median west of Lynmar Lane as a traffic calming measure (see Figure 3). This median will be consistent with similar treatments in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood adjacent to 66th and 70th Streets. Figure 3: 72nd Street Median at Lynmar Lane Page 50 of 668 Engineering Study W.72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 9 Parking It is proposed that on-street parking will continue to be restricted on both sides of the street. The proposed 24’ width can accommodate one-sided parking in the future if desired by the neighborhood. The existing and proposed roadway widths, sidewalks and parking recommendations are also shown in Figure 3, Table 1. Existing 30’ road width, two-sided parking (changed to no parking in 2025) Page 51 of 668 Engineering Study W.72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 10 Proposed 24’ road width, no parking Figure 4: 72nd Street Street Existing Roadway Width (face to face), feet Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Sidewalk Width, feet Boulevard Width, feet Parking 72nd Street 30 24 5 - 8 0-5 None Table 1: Street Widths, Sidewalks and Parking As directed by the City Council, this project will include a right-in / right-out median for 7200 France Ave to direct vehicles to France Avenue (see Figure 4). Page 52 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 11 Figure 5: Right-in / Right-out at 7200 France Ave Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs will conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Multi-Modal Transportation Staff seeks to balance the recommendations of the City’s guiding documents (Living Streets Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan), feedback from affected residents, available right-of-way and potential tree and infrastructure impacts. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Staff is proposing a new 8’ shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street between Cornelia Drive and France Avenue. This facility is not included in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan but will connect to other pedestrian and bicycle facilities adjacent to the project area. The proposed shared-use path also supports the Climate Action Plan goal to “accelerate building…sidewalks and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas.” Compared to Edina overall, this neighborhood has higher percentages of populations identifying as: • Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC) • Living in poverty • Foreign-born • Unemployed • Having a physical or mental disability • Having no access to a motor vehicle The proposed multi-modal facilities will improve access, mobility and safety for these populations. Page 53 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 12 The grass boulevards that will separate the new curb and the proposed shared-use path are proposed to be 4’-wide but may vary depending on construction conflicts. Separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and portions of the existing sidewalks will be reconstructed as necessary. Per the City’s Sidewalk Maintenance Policy, the existing sidewalk and proposed shared-use path will be maintained by adjacent property owners. Transit Facilities Staff will review available right-of-way and consider constructed an accessible boarding area (also referred to as an ADA pad) at 7128 France Ave adjacent to the project area. If feasible, staff will coordinate with Metro Transit on the design and location of the pad. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The south trunk sanitary sewer project is the main driver of this project. It serves a large area of western Edina, carrying nearly half the flow for the city. The existing RCP pipe will be replaced with 36” PVC pipe to support current and future sanitary sewer flows. When all phases of the South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements are complete, it will allow land use changes upstream, primarily in the industrial / Cahill area. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. All watermain pipe and service leads to properties, gate valves, and fire hydrants along 72nd Street will be replaced. The new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. Storm Sewer Because the existing curb and gutter are integral with the concrete pavement, they will be replaced as part of the roadway pavement reconstruction, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. The existing drainage structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition as well as the proposed roadway width change. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Private Utilities Staff will meet with representatives of several private utility companies in December 2025, to discuss the proposed 2026 reconstruction project and preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Page 54 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 13 No changes to street lighting is proposed. RIGHT-OF-WAY/ EASEMENTS: The majority of the existing roadway right-of-way for 72nd Street is 60’. It is anticipated that this project can be constructed within the existing ROW. A portion of the in- place boulevard items may interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements. Staff will work with adjacent property owners on a case-by-case basis. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $6,400,000, (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway $313,000 Special Assessments Roadway $282,000 Property Taxes Roadway Total: $595,000 Sanitary Sewer $4,200,000 Watermain $850,000 Storm Sewer $555,000 Utility Total: $5,605,000 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total: $200,000 PACS Fund Project Total: $6,400,000 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 55.25 roadway residential equivalent units (REUs) in this project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $6,000 (see Figure 6). The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix J. Page 55 of 668 Engineering Study W. 72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 14 Figure 6: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map The methodology for calculating assessments per REU are as follows: The multiple unit property located at 7128 France Ave is a memory care facility with 92 units. It will be assessed a 0.5 REU factor per unit based on the City’s assessment policy and 0.25 being on two corners of streets. Table 3 shows their REU calculations based on the City’s assessment policy. Table 3: Multiple Unit Multi-Family Residential Properties There is one multiple unit multi-family residential corner property located in the project limits that will be assessed a 0.5 REU factor per unit and 0.5 REU for a corner lot. Table 4 shows their REU calculations based on the City’s assessment policy. PID Address Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU 3102824110079 7128 FRANCE AVE Multi-Family (92 units) 0.25 0.5 92 x 0.25 x 0.5 = 11.5 Page 56 of 668 Engineering Study W.72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 15 Table 4: Multiple Unit Multi-Family Residential Corner Properties PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Informational Open Houses July 28, & August 4, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Open Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Close Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2025 Public Improvement Hearing Council Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2026 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure along 72nd Street. APPENDIX: A.Traffic Data B.Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C.Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D.Watermain Breaks E.Street Signs F.Living Streets Plan G.Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H.Resident Questionnaire I.Preliminary Assessment Roll PID Address Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU 3102824140001 7200 FRANCE AVE Multi-Family (153 units) 0.5 0.5 153 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 38.25 Page 57 of 668 Engineering Study W.72nd Street Reconstruction SS-538 November 25, 2025 16 Page 58 of 668 APPENDIX A Traffic Data Page 59 of 668 #Location Year Month ADT Peak HR Volume Peak Time 85% Speed (MPH) Average Speed (MPH) 1 West of Glouchester 2019 August 2247 246 4:30 PM 28.5 24.5 2 East of Glouchester 2020 August 714 90 4:45 PM 33.8 30.5 3 West of Bristol 2025 May 1926 216 7:15 AM 32.7 27.9 3 West of Bristol 2025 May 1969 219 7:30 AM 32.8 28.2 3 West of Bristol 2025 September 1568 168 4:00 PM 33.4 28.5 Page 60 of 668 Comment Week 1 data Week 2 data W/ Parking Restrictions and 2nd week of school Page 61 of 668 APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Page 62 of 668 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree kNineMileCree kNine Mile Creek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use PathExisting Sidewalk Proposed Shared-Use PathProposed SidewalkProposed Twin Loops Page 63 of 668 APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map Page 64 of 668 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree k NineMileCreek Ni ne Mile Cre ek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use Path Proposed Shared-Use Path Proposed Twin Loops Advisory Bike Lane Existing Bike Boulevard Bikeable ShoulderExisting Shared Bike LaneExisting Bike LaneExisting Buffered Bike Lane Proposed Bike BoulevardProposed Bike LaneProposed Buffered Bike Lane Page 65 of 668 APPENDIX D Watermain Breaks Page 66 of 668 7000 7320-30 7340 7300-10 7333-55 7128 7201 70084208 42167205 4401 7203 7025 72077207 7207 7350-60 3680-3484 72007010 4040 3950 7000695071104000 4001 7001 7101 7136 7212 7216 3861-817015 7000 70087205 6996 7007 6953 71014225 421742214221 4 0 0 042136949 6941 6937 4401 4217 7000 7108 7129 7108 4304 7209 7200 4308 4401 4309 7013 7204 6945 4200 4305 4400 4301 4209 3910 7208 7001 7116 440144004224 7208 4400 7001 7201 7201 4300 7137 7004 7021 7200 7007 7129 7016 7012 7133 7004 7017 7117 710942164220 7005 7128 7100 712542017000 7009 7013 7004 7204 7001 71084212 71217129 7008 7124 7201 7005 7101 7125 7009 7200 7213 7217 7120 72067109 7209 7128 7009 7128 4200 7125 7012 7121 7016 7137 7105 7113 7205 7117 7105 7117 71247124 7204 71214209 7204 7206 7205 7133 7111 7208 7116 7104 7104 7112 7205 7100 7116 7120 7132 7101 7120 7112 7102 7209 7129 7100 7201 7109 7125 4204 7128 7105 7124 420142127104 7121 7113 4208720442057112 7120 7200 7221 7301 7017 4400 7305 7309 7313 7317 7321 7325 7329 7333 73374401 7213 7217 7221 7301 7305 7309 7313 7317 7321 7225 7212 7216 7220 7224 7300 7304 7308 7312 7316 7320 7324 7212 7216 7220 7224 7300 7304 7308 7312 7316 7320 7213 7217 7219 7303 7305 73097311 7317 7321 7211 7215 7221 7301 7307 7313 7315 7319 7326732873307334733273367338734073237208 72087210 7212 72097209 7250 73007380 W 72ND ST Project Limits CORNELIA DRGLOUCHESTER DRHEATHERTONCIRHEATHERTON TRLBRISTOL BLVDBRISTOL CIR FRANCE AVELYNMAR LNGLOUCHESTER AVEOAKLAWN AVE/ Engineering DeptNovember 2025 Watermain BreaksSouth Trunk Sanitary Phase 1 CITYOFEDIN A MIN NESOTAINCORPORAT E D 1888 , e Legend Watermain Breaks Page 67 of 668 APPENDIX E Street Signs Page 68 of 668 ÅÆÇ!"$!"$bcdpf bcdpf !"$bcdpf!"$!"$!"$89:z!"$ÅÆÇÅÆÇ!"$1237 7000 7320-30 7340 7300-10 7333-55 7128 7201 70084208 42167205 4401 7203 7025 72077207 7207 7350-60 3680-3484 72007010 4040 3950 7000695071104000 4001 7001 7101 7136 7212 7216 3861-817015 7000 70087205 6996 7007 6953 71014225 421742214221 4 0 0 042136949 6941 6937 4401 4217 7000 7108 7129 7108 4304 7209 7200 4308 4401 4309 7013 7204 6945 4200 4305 4400 4301 4209 3910 7208 7001 7116 440144004224 7208 4400 7001 7201 7201 4300 7137 7004 7021 7200 7007 7129 7016 7012 7133 7004 7017 7117 710942164220 7005 7128 7100 712542017000 7009 7013 7004 7204 7001 71084212 71217129 7008 7124 7201 7005 7101 7125 7009 7200 7213 7217 7120 72067109 7209 7128 7009 7128 4200 7125 7012 7121 7016 7137 7105 7113 7205 7117 7105 7117 71247124 7204 71214209 7204 7206 7205 7133 7111 7208 7116 7104 7104 7112 7205 7100 7116 7120 7132 7101 7120 7112 7102 7209 7129 7100 7201 7109 7125 4204 7128 7105 7124 420142127104 7121 7113 4208720442057112 7120 7200 7221 7301 7017 4400 7305 7309 7313 7317 7321 7325 7329 7333 73374401 7213 7217 7221 7301 7305 7309 7313 7317 7321 7225 7212 7216 7220 7224 7300 7304 7308 7312 7316 7320 7324 7212 7216 7220 7224 7300 7304 7308 7312 7316 7320 7213 7217 7219 7303 7305 73097311 7317 7321 7211 7215 7221 7301 7307 7313 7315 7319 7326732873307334733273367338734073237208 72087210 7212 72097209 7250 73007380 W 72ND ST Project Limits CORNELIA DRGLOUCHESTER DRHEATHERTONCIRHEATHERTON TRLBRISTOL BLVDBRISTOL CIR FRANCE AVELYNMAR LNGLOUCHESTER AVEOAKLAWN AVE/ Engineering DeptNovember 2025 Existing SignsSouth Trunk Sanitary Phase 1 CITYOFEDIN A MIN NESOTAINCORPORAT E D 1888 , e Page 69 of 668 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Page 70 of 668 Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy Page 71 of 668 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 72 of 668 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 73 of 668 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 74 of 668 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 75 of 668 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 76 of 668 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 77 of 668 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 78 of 668 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 79 of 668 APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Page 80 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room October 23, 2025 1. Call to Order Vice Chair Brown called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Bildsten, Brown, Olson, White Late: Commissioner Lassig Absent: Commissioners Lewis, Rosen, Trueger, Wright, Bracken Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni, 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the September 18, 2025 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. 5. Community Comment Taylor Bruhschwein, 5744 Ewing Ave, commented on the Wooddale Ave bike lane updates between 50th St and Valley View Rd noted in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and asked the Commission to review the proposed project. Bruhschwein noted that the project has a good chance to decrease motor vehicle trips on Wooddale Ave and connect to the proposed Twin Loops facility. The corridor is close to Pamela Park, Wooddale Park, Utley Park, four schools and commercial destinations. Bruhschwein noted that the current infrastructure does not feel safe and felt that demand is there to bike if improvements were to be made. Bruhschwein also asked the Commission to be bold when reviewing the proposed reconstruction projects tonight. Commissioner Lassig arrived at 6:08. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Prospect Knolls A/C/D Reconstruction Project Senior Project Engineer Ben Jore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • Suggest including the intersection of 70th St and Antrim Rd and to consider extending the westbound bike lane to the intersection. Page 81 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 • Consider extending the sidewalk one more block north on Shannon Dr to Lee Valley to collect more walkshed. • Concerned about resident opposition at the 11th hour like the Concord reconstruction project last year. • Suggest referencing the Quality of Life Survey results at the public hearing to show support for sidewalks. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented. Motion failed for lack of a second. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented and to recommend additional analysis of the 70th St and Antrim Rd intersection for a potential demonstration project. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.2. Parklawn Court Reconstruction Project Graduate Engineer Chris Moore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • Appreciate the critical thought put into the recommendations. This sidewalk connection is a small but important link. • Suggest that lack of response from adjacent properties owners/tenants might reflect support for the project. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Olson to endorse the proposed improvements for the Parklawn Court reconstruction project as presented. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.3. South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project Staff Liaison Scipioni presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • The proposed shared-use path would be great for providing access to the future France Avenue pedestrian crossing. • Suggest considering another midblock median further west along the corridor. • Suggest constructing the proposed Wooddale Ave bike boulevard through the South Cornelia neighborhood as part of this project. • The multi-year project will be disruptive to the residents, but it will provide a good opportunity for new multi-modal facilities. 6.4. Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 The Commission reviewed and commented on the staff report. Page 82 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 Commissioner White left at 7:32. 6.5. SEMAP Update Staff Liaison Scipioni presented an update on the status of the Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan. 6.6. Initiative #5 City Code Sec. 26-282 The Commission reviewed and commented on the draft report. 6.7. 2025 Work Plan Updates 1. Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan Participation – Commission received an update at tonight’s meeting. Staff is planning to meet with Hennepin County’s staff to discuss their safety action plan. 2. Commission-Led Events – Committee and staff participated in Concord Elementary’s bike/walk to school day on October 8. 3. Review of City Policies/Ordinances – Committee is working on draft report. 4. City Code Update – No update. 5. City Code Regarding Bicycles – Committee has draft report, will review with Commission at next meeting. 7. Staff Comments – Received. 7.1. Transportation Projects Update Staff provided an update on current and upcoming transportation projects in and around Edina. 7.2. 2025 Meeting Dates The Commission’s next regular meeting is Thursday, November 20. 8. Chair and Member Comments – Received. 9. Adjournment Vice Chair Brown adjourned the meeting at 8:23. Page 83 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 SEAT NAME 1 Wright, Grant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% 2 VACANT 3 Bildsten, Roger 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 5 Rosen, Adam 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 7 Olson, Bethany 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 8 White, Joan 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 9 VACANT 10 Lassig, Augie (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 11 Bracken, Logan (s) 1 1 50% Page 84 of 668 APPENDIX H Resident Questionnaires and Responses Page 85 of 668 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 02 September 2025 72nd Street Traffic Survey Better Together Edina Project: South Trunk Sanitary Sewer VISITORS 70 CONTRIBUTORS 22 RESPONSES 22 22 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 22 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Page 86 of 668 Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 28, 2025 08:48:54 am Last Seen:Jul 28, 2025 15:44:56 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. I drive down West 72nd every day on my way to and from work. I have never witnessed people driving fast, a significant amount of cars or unsafe behavior. The only issue right now is all of the construction work and parking for the corner of France and 72nd. I live on West Shore Dr between Gilford and Hibiscus and we experience much worse behavior and speeding on West Shore Dr. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: not answered Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) not answered Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? not answered Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Page 87 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? One sidewalk is fine. Please do not add bike lines. There's not enough room. Everything is fine there. I'm surprised to hear complaining as I have not seen any poor actions and I drive there every day (I also drive safely myself as I'm a mom to young kids). I feel like West Shore Dr would need more assessment than that street. Q14.What is your street name?West Shore Dr. Page 88 of 668 Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 28, 2025 18:59:19 pm Last Seen:Jul 29, 2025 01:38:25 am Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Hey guys. Thanks for tonight's presentation and discussion. It was informative and I appreciate you taking the time to share. Here is a quick recap of the ideas I shared/came up with speaking to you and my neighbors: 1) I support Concept A the most. I think having a wider shared sidewalk on the south-side of 72nd would be awesome for pedestrians and bicyclists. 2) I'd like to see if there's neighborhood interest in a mini-roundabout on 72nd and Heatherton Trail to force drivers to slow down. I think this is a simple but effective solution that seems to work elsewhere in the city. As I said at the meeting, I'd be happy to help pay for that construction and any plants that could create a barrier for those neighbors from headlight pollution. 3) An alternative (perhaps radical) idea would be to seal up the section of 72nd between Oaklawn and Cornelia Drive. This would remove the ability for people to cut through the neighborhoods and speed along 72nd. Obviously the downside is that the folks on Oaklawn would be cut off from easy access to France, but in exchange, they'd have a very secluded and private street. A solution to better access that I had chatted with Ross about was connecting 76th through Fred Richards to Kellog Avenue. It'll probably be controversial but it's a practical solution that gives the Fire Department even quicker access to the Lake Edina neighborhood. ~ Dietrich Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Other (please specify) Cause it's fun. Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. Wide sidewalks. I grew up with them in Chicago and it allowed all of us kids to get to know the families on our block because we'd run up and down them playing. I wish we had more of them in Edina so kids could share that same experience here. Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Other (please specify) Cause it's fun. Page 89 of 668 Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Wider sidewalks. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Neutral Q13.Any additional comments? Nah. Keep me posted. Good luck and have fun. Q14.What is your street name?Glouchester Avenue Page 90 of 668 Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 30, 2025 12:46:49 pm Last Seen:Jul 30, 2025 19:44:58 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. For 72nd Street traffic volume, my concern is the increased volume of traffic on Cornelia Drive south of 70th and on 72nd east of Cornelia: Increased Traffic. The current proposal has access to the properties off 72nd Street, a residential street. It also has traffic being dumped back onto 72nd to leave the property. Here is the issue. With no north bound/ left turn lane from 72nd Street to go north on France Ave, all traffic leaving 7200 France Avenue and needing to go north must drive west on 72nd and will most likely head to Cornelia Drive to turn right/ north to access 70th Street. (Or at least have to go north on Lynmar past single-family homes to access Hazelton to get to a controlled intersection at France Avenue.) I propose a median starting at Lynmar separating East and West bound traffic. All traffic from 7200 and 7250 be required to turn right (East bound) out of the property to Southbound France. Intersection of Cornelia Drive and 72nd Street. Already traffic coming east on 70th street to go south France cut down Cornelia Drive to 72nd street. The intersection of Cornelia Drive and 72nd street is already dangerous. Adding apartments at 7200 (and planned Macy’s redevelopment) will only increase traffic in this area. Therefore we need a longer-term solution to this issue affecting our nice neighborhood and school. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Page 91 of 668 Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Cornelia Drive Page 92 of 668 Respondent No:4 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 31, 2025 08:13:18 am Last Seen:Jul 31, 2025 15:08:16 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Traffic is too fast, little regard for safety. Question #2 doesn’t have an adequate response option as I am severely and equally impacted during all: driving, biking and on foot. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Insufficient lighting Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Other (please specify) Recreation, with little kids. Walking to kids bus stop. Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. Sidewalks on both sides, bike lanes on both sides, crossing lights and painted crosswalks Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Other (please specify) Recreation, with little kids Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Sidewalks on both sides, bike lanes on both sides, crossing lights and painted crosswalks Page 93 of 668 Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Glouchester Dr Page 94 of 668 Respondent No:5 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 31, 2025 11:02:02 am Last Seen:Jul 31, 2025 17:41:59 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Sometimes people drive fast along 72nd and I notice it if I am walking on the sidewalk along there. Once I saw that a baby turkey had been hit and killed on 72nd. The rest of the flock was hanging around the dead body like they were mourning it. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) not answered Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. I don't know but I would usually avoid biking on 72nd because of my perceived car traffic speeds. Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Neutral Page 95 of 668 Q13.Any additional comments? I wonder if the neighborhood may benefit from being able to drive through a new access at 7200 to get to Gallagher Drive? It would shrink down a big block creating additional access to the south. I also wonder about a road access from Kellogg Ave to Parklawn Ave. at Fred Richards? That would give another outlet for drivers in the Lake Edina and the South Cornelia neighborhoods so that 72nd doesn't get all the traffic? Q14.What is your street name?Bristol Blvd. Page 96 of 668 Respondent No:6 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 01, 2025 06:44:06 am Last Seen:Aug 01, 2025 13:29:49 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Cars do seem to speed down 72nd when heading west from France. They often fail to fully stop at the corner of Cornelia Dr and 72nd. There are many people that walk, run, and bike along 72nd. Young kids are heading to the elementary school, people are getting exercise, and environmentally conscious adults are taking advantage of being close to restaurants and grocery stores by walking to do errands. I’d love to see a side walk on the south side of 72nd from France to Cornelia Dr. A dedicated bike lane would also be great. Anything to protect pedestrians would be appreciated. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Other (please specify) Lack of sidewalks on the south side of 72nd st. Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. A bike lane and sidewalk would be great! Especially when the bldg on the corner of 72nd is finished, I look forward to cutting through that lot to get to the nine mile creek trail instead of walking down France. Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Other (please specify) Kids ride their bikes ALL the time to meet up with friends and take themselves to a park, the pool, grocery stores, etc! Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. A dedicated bike lane, signage, additional sidewalk walk. Easier way to connect to the nine mile creek trail. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Page 97 of 668 Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? Anything we can do to make the streets more safe for the all of the kids and make it easier for people to use non automotive transportation in this very walkable neighborhood would be excellent. We are really lucky to live so close to so many businesses - let’s make the area easy for individuals to access it outside of a car! Q14.What is your street name?Gloucester Dr. Page 98 of 668 Respondent No:7 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 01, 2025 07:03:46 am Last Seen:Aug 01, 2025 13:23:41 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. I am an Oaklawn Ave resident in south Cornelia and I am also concerned about speeding on Oaklawn Ave specifically. Many people use Oaklawn to access deeper parts of the neighborhood and I've seen people of all ages going way too fast down that road (35+MPH). Would love to also discuss speed mitigation options for Oaklawn - feel free to reach out to me directly Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Other (please specify) family fun Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Page 99 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Oaklawn Ave Page 100 of 668 Respondent No:8 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 01, 2025 08:39:31 am Last Seen:Aug 01, 2025 15:25:52 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Traffic down 72nd going west is very very prone to Not stopping at the Cornelia intersection, either when going straight or taking a right. Sometimes it appears people dont see the stop sign, but more often they seem to not care or are rushed getting to school and or and appear to be cutting through up to 70th. The long uninterrupted wide straight away presents as a road with higher speeds. Please consider small round abouts and or additional stop signs. Also, adding NOT a Through street to Cornelia and Gloucester south of 72nd to cut down on Lost driver's. Often people appear to think it connects to parkland, cedars. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Other (please specify) Dog walking Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Page 101 of 668 Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Cornelia Drive Page 102 of 668 Respondent No:9 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 01, 2025 09:29:43 am Last Seen:Aug 01, 2025 16:24:08 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Traffic is too fast along 70th from 100-France Ave; people go much faster than the posted limit; people don't always slow/stop for the flashing yellow at Wooddale. Traffic is too fast on Wooddale - posted 30 but should be 25 like elsewhere in neighborhood - why is this deadend street (70th to Guilford) faster than elsewhere? Lot of biking ON the sidewalks Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers turning corner too fast Insufficient lighting Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Page 103 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? Question of how or if the bike facility along south side of 72nd would connect to other bike lanes - i.e. so you exit on to France and what? go on sidewalk? move into traffic? Q14.What is your street name?Wooddale Ave. Page 104 of 668 Respondent No:10 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 01, 2025 10:32:44 am Last Seen:Aug 01, 2025 17:28:15 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Drivers rarely fully stop at the stop signs on 72nd and Claremore, and Oaklawn, Particularly the west bound stop sign Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers turning corner too fast Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Neutral Page 105 of 668 Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Oaklawn Ave Page 106 of 668 Respondent No:11 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 01, 2025 11:07:46 am Last Seen:Aug 01, 2025 13:29:01 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. not answered Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Other (please specify) Our culture is too darn focused on automobiles and I'll accept just about any tradeoff that makes walking and biking safer or more enjoyable. Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Other (please specify) To see and be seen. Walking especially is a way to have spontaneous social interactions. Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. How about a sitting bench or two along 72nd Street, perhaps a little east of Lynmar? Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Other (please specify) Get to friend's houses faster than walking would allow. Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Page 107 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? I appreciate you. :) Q14.What is your street name?Hibiscus (formerly Heatherton Trl for 13 years) Page 108 of 668 Respondent No:12 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 02, 2025 05:54:57 am Last Seen:Aug 02, 2025 12:46:07 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Significant increased traffic on 72nd Street between West shore and France. Worst times of day are 230-6 pm. Many cars cutting thru neighborhood when 70th is backed up (which is often and worse when school is in session). Many cars going above speed limit. Significant construction vehicles for 72nd &amp; France project causing increased congestion as well. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Other (please specify) Signs and lighting are good- sheer volume, speed and congestion are troublesome and will likely only get worse with 6 more apartment buildings coming on 72nd/France corridor Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Never Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. None- too dangerous Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Page 109 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Glouchester Drive Page 110 of 668 Respondent No:13 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 03, 2025 13:37:31 pm Last Seen:Aug 03, 2025 20:21:39 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. It seems 72nd and Cornelia are often used as cut through in the neighborhood. I have seen cars often drive very quickly down these streets. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) not answered Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. Speed tracking radar signs might help to reduce the speed of some cars Diverting traffic to not use neighborhood as a cut through would also help Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. We do not ride as the kids aren't riding bikes yet Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Neutral Page 111 of 668 Q13.Any additional comments? I like the idea of landmark or neighborhood marker at 72nd and Lynmar to announce that cars are entering a neighborhood. Q14.What is your street name?Jeffrey Koch Page 112 of 668 Respondent No:14 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 03, 2025 18:22:48 pm Last Seen:Aug 04, 2025 01:03:14 am Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. I am seeing more cut-through traffic because of traffic backs up on 70th Street. Individuals run through the stops signs at 72nd &amp; Cornelia Drive and 72nd &amp; Oaklawn at an alarming rate. Without sidewalks throughout the neighborhood, I’m concerned about the safety of our residents, particularly younger children. All traffic from the 7200/7250 France project needs to be diverted so it doesn’t come through our neighborhood, including all traffic entering the buildings and leaving the buildings. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Insufficient lighting Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Less traffic and better stop sign enforcement. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Page 113 of 668 Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? All traffic plans need to take into account Cornelia Elementary School. The increased traffic on Cornelia Drive is an accident waiting to happen. Also, the construction parking on 72nd Street makes the road too narrow, especially with Xcel Energy working on 72nd Street. I’ve had to back up to let other traffic through. Why can’t the construction workers park on the owner’s property on 70th &amp; France? Q14.What is your street name?Ellsworth Drive Page 114 of 668 Respondent No:15 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 04, 2025 14:54:22 pm Last Seen:Aug 04, 2025 21:25:22 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. The traffic along 72 is too fast-many speeders, too much traffic because people are using it as a short cut to 70th street, AND with the new buildings coming up on France it will be WORSE. Please implement traffic CALMING to BY the Buildings on France and 72. Add the roundabout there. We DO NOT need a Bike Lane. We do not need sidewalks on both sides of the street, the existing one is enough. This is a residential neighborhood and keep it that way! Repair the terrible condition of 72nd street, narrow it if you want, but all these other plans are just stupid ways to spend more tax money. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Other (please specify) You are adding 100's of daily visitors with the 2 new buildings. Make it difficult to zoom down 72 and run over kids walking to Cornelia school. Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. DONT ADD BIKE LANES! The one on 70th is underutilized and a waste of taxpayers money. We live in a climate not conducive to biking many months of the year. Do not make the SAME MISTAKES Minneapolis is making to make their city a bike lane nightmare to residents because of an over represented voice of the bike lobby. I walk the sidewalks daily 12 months of the year, one side of the road is enough. Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Page 115 of 668 Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. If it didn't snow and get cold in winter. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? Repave 72nd street. Add a roundabout or dead end to enter the new commercial building sites, so those people can only turn onto France. Calm traffic by narrowing the road or routing the through traffic off 72nd. PLEASE NO BIKE LANES!!! Q14.What is your street name?Bristol Page 116 of 668 Respondent No:16 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 04, 2025 16:32:15 pm Last Seen:Aug 04, 2025 23:25:19 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Speed and traffic volumes are concerns along both 72nd St and Cornelia Dr. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers turning corner too fast Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Other (please specify) Walking dog Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Never Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Page 117 of 668 Q13.Any additional comments? As others have shared, I have concerns about additional traffic flow along 72nd St (and Cornelia Dr) due to the development projects at 72nd and France. Q14.What is your street name?Cornelia Dr Page 118 of 668 Respondent No:17 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 04, 2025 18:57:09 pm Last Seen:Aug 05, 2025 01:52:32 am Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Traffic volume coming off of 70th St. driving past Cornelia School Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers turning corner too fast Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Dissatisfied Page 119 of 668 Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Cornelia Drive Page 120 of 668 Respondent No:18 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 11, 2025 19:51:43 pm Last Seen:Aug 12, 2025 02:43:00 am Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Increased traffic avoiding 70th during rush hour Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Bicycling Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Drivers failing to yield Other (please specify) Speed, especially on Wooddale and West Shore, traffic is pretty fast for a neighborhood street with no bike lane/pedestrian path Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Better access connecting to the other side of France (Centennial Lakes, Library). I bike with my kids a lot and France is hard to cross. We do it at times - but have to be very vigilant even at green lights. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Page 121 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? Bike lane on the south side would greatly improve connecting the neighborhood to 9 Mile Creek. Crossing over France will be easier. Bike lane would need separation/ grass area to make the best of it and also allow for safe bikong/walking to school for Q14.What is your street name?Belvidere Lane Page 122 of 668 Respondent No:19 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 28, 2025 08:54:14 am Last Seen:Aug 28, 2025 15:59:45 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. South cornelia is an easy cut through when traffic gets backed up on 70th street or France Ave. The wide street with no stop sign until Cornelia Dr makes it easy to speed. Not everyone comes to a complete stop at Cornelia Dr and can miss pedestrians waiting to cross. Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers turning corner too fast Insufficient lighting Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Other (please specify) Walking dog Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. More time… too busy with job and kid activities Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Finding the time to pull bikes down from storage racks in garage and get the bikes tuned up. Not space in garage to keep bikes down and my car in the garage Theft of bikes in the area and not wanting bike to get stolen Is my lock strong enough/ safe enough? Do I still remember the code or can I find the key? Will there be bike racks near place I am going? What if it rains? Is it too hot outside? Or too cold outside? Or snow and ice on the ground? Not able to wear dress clothes/ work clothes on bike. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Page 123 of 668 Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very dissatisfied Q13.Any additional comments? Please keep the tree canopy along 72nd. It beautifies the street, calms traffic and creates a natural barrier between the neighborhood and Southdale area. Please consider a median/ center island as you enter the neighborhood on Lynmar and 72nd. Too many kids in the neighborhood for on street bike lanes, biking should be separate from the street. Q14.What is your street name?Cornelia Dr Page 124 of 668 Respondent No:20 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 28, 2025 09:27:43 am Last Seen:Aug 28, 2025 16:21:20 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. West Shore and Wooddale desperately need sidewalks for safe travel to Cornelia school Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Other (please specify) SPEED Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Frequently (2-3 times per week) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Other (please specify) Walk to from events at Cornelia School / Park Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. More sidewalks. The volume and speed of vehicle traffic on main arteries that one would use for fitness walks or to access the school / park makes walking unpleasant. On West Shore and Wooddale, one can never enjoy the walk as one must always be looking in front and behind for cars and construction and delivery vehicles. You can’t let your guard down and just enjoy the natural surroundings…it’s a shame. Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Dedicated protected bike lanes on main arteries. Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Satisfied Page 125 of 668 Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Gilford Page 126 of 668 Respondent No:21 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 28, 2025 09:50:26 am Last Seen:Aug 28, 2025 16:46:52 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. People tend to use 72nd as a cut through Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Issues with sight lines or clear view Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Dissatisfied Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Dissatisfied Page 127 of 668 Q13.Any additional comments? not answered Q14.What is your street name?Gilford Page 128 of 668 Respondent No:22 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 31, 2025 12:38:13 pm Last Seen:Aug 31, 2025 19:08:42 pm Q1.If you haven’t previous communicated about traffic in your neighborhood or if you would like to submit additional comments, please tell us anything you would like us to know about existing traffic volume, speed, or behaviors along the street or at specific locations. Have previously communicated Q2.Based on your response to question #1 in general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Walking, jogging, or running Q3.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feelings about traffic? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Other (please specify) Speed! Q4.How frequently do you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Q5.If you walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Other (please specify) Doing yard work on our yard that is adjacent to 72nd Q6.If you don't walk, roll, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q7.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Rarely (less than once per month) Q8.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q9.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Probably nothing Q10.How would you feel about an additional sidewalk along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Q11.How would you feel about an off-street bike facility or shared-use path along the south side of 72nd Street? Neutral Page 129 of 668 Q12.How would you feel about on-street bike lanes on 72nd Street? Very Satisfied Q13.Any additional comments? We like the idea of a sidewalk or shared use path, though have concerns about our existing large canopy tree and our fence. It sounded like the street would be narrowed to hopefully minimize that impact and efforts could be made to go around trees. In that case, we would be fine with it. Q14.What is your street name?72nd street and Heatherton Circle Page 130 of 668 Page 131 of 668 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 02 September 2025 Sewer Survey Better Together Edina Project: South Trunk Sanitary Sewer VISITORS 7 CONTRIBUTORS 3 RESPONSES 3 3 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 3 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Page 132 of 668 Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 28, 2025 09:12:56 am Last Seen:Aug 28, 2025 15:59:45 pm Q1.These values guide Edina’s approach to projects. How important are each of these to you, in terms of this project? 1. Stewardship: We make wise investments that focus on the best long-term value for our residents 2. Health: We use Health-in-all policies approach to promote and protect the physical, mental and social wellbeing of all people who live, work or visit Edina. 3. Sustainability: We ensure that our policies, decisions and plans have a positive impact on people and the planet now and for future generations. Q2.The degree of construction impact is dependent on project design, construction type, staging, and cost factors. Which of these is most important to you? Other (please specify) I think it's about finding the right balance between cost and disruption and safety. Completing outside of the school year would be a factor that would allow more disruption during the months of no school traffic. Q3.Different construction types have varying impacts on areas outside the public right-of- way. Which of the following would you prefer? Other (please specify) Again this is a balance between cost and disruption. Reducing costs is very important but can you try to minimize the amount of impact to surrounding properties? Q4.What construction impacts are you most concerned with being addressed? Choose up to 3. Other (please specify) Property damage to surrounding homes due to noise & vibration Improperly marked sewer and gas lines that cause gas leaks and water/sewer damage to nearby properties Lack of clean up and leaving blvds in worse shape than you found them... as we have had happen with the USI installation and Safe walk to school grant. Q5.How would you like to keep informed during construction? (choose up to 3) Email updates to subscribed email addresses Posts on the project website Updates via neighborhood association Q6.What improvements would you like to see to street design once the project is completed? Quieter street narrower calmer street but not too narrow so buses and garbage trucks can't pass each other Keep the large tree canopy Get everything done now and kept in good shape so it can last another 60 years! Take ownership of mistakes that happen during construction and take precautions to keep them from happening in the first place. Page 133 of 668 Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 28, 2025 09:53:11 am Last Seen:Aug 28, 2025 16:46:52 pm Q1.These values guide Edina’s approach to projects. How important are each of these to you, in terms of this project? 1. Stewardship: We make wise investments that focus on the best long-term value for our residents 2. Sustainability: We ensure that our policies, decisions and plans have a positive impact on people and the planet now and for future generations. 3. Health: We use Health-in-all policies approach to promote and protect the physical, mental and social wellbeing of all people who live, work or visit Edina. Q2.The degree of construction impact is dependent on project design, construction type, staging, and cost factors. Which of these is most important to you? A more efficient construction project, minimizing the cost to taxpayers and property owner assessment Q3.Different construction types have varying impacts on areas outside the public right-of- way. Which of the following would you prefer? Allowing the project to extend outside the right-of-way, even if causes more impacts on surrounding properties Q4.What construction impacts are you most concerned with being addressed? Choose up to 3. Restrictions on access to properties in the area Service disruptions to utilities during construction Impacts to adjacent lawns and driveways Q5.How would you like to keep informed during construction? (choose up to 3) Email updates to subscribed email addresses Posts on the project website Posted signage in impacted area Q6.What improvements would you like to see to street design once the project is completed? not answered Page 134 of 668 Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:Aug 28, 2025 11:49:21 am Last Seen:Aug 28, 2025 18:45:02 pm Q1.These values guide Edina’s approach to projects. How important are each of these to you, in terms of this project? 1. Stewardship: We make wise investments that focus on the best long-term value for our residents 2. Health: We use Health-in-all policies approach to promote and protect the physical, mental and social wellbeing of all people who live, work or visit Edina. 3. Sustainability: We ensure that our policies, decisions and plans have a positive impact on people and the planet now and for future generations. Q2.The degree of construction impact is dependent on project design, construction type, staging, and cost factors. Which of these is most important to you? A less invasive construction type, minimizing the intensity of disruption (including impact into existing greenspace and driveway access), and the amount of traffic detours Q3.Different construction types have varying impacts on areas outside the public right-of- way. Which of the following would you prefer? Keeping the project within the right-of-way as much as possible, even if it increases the construction time period or raises costs Q4.What construction impacts are you most concerned with being addressed? Choose up to 3. Restrictions on access to properties in the area Service disruptions to utilities during construction Impacts to adjacent lawns and driveways Q5.How would you like to keep informed during construction? (choose up to 3) Email updates to subscribed email addresses Posts on the project website Q6.What improvements would you like to see to street design once the project is completed? not answered Page 135 of 668 APPENDIX I Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 136 of 668 Pid No. Street Owner City/State/Zip Assessable REU Assessment Cost3102824110064 7128 BRISTOL BLVD MAUREEN E WONG EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.003102824110076 7129 BRISTOL BLVD J A ZAHORSKY & S N ZAHORSKY EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.00$0.003102824140008 7200 BRISTOL CIR ANJELIKA AMES & JEREMY AMES EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824140014 7201 BRISTOL CIR BRUCE & CATHLEEN CAMPBELL EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824140032 7203 BRISTOL CIR MARJORIE THOENEN EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824120010 CITY OF EDINA 1.5 $9,000.003102824120045 7137 CORNELIA DR NEIL A & MARIE A JOHNSON EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.003102824130031 7201 CORNELIA DR GEOFFREY GOLD & SHIRYIN GOLD EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824130001 7200 CORNELIA DR AKHILA SRIDHARAMURTHY & SUHAS BAJGUR EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824110079 7128 FRANCE AVE VENTAS REALTY EDINA, MN 55435 11.5 $69,000.003102824140001 7200 FRANCE AVE FRANCE PROPERTY PARTNERS LLC EDINA, MN 55435 38.25 $229,500.00$0.003102824120026 7136 GLOUCHESTER AVE MEGANATHAN MALLI VISWANATHAN EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.003102824120016 7137 GLOUCHESTER AVE SATISH IYENGAR EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.00$0.003102824130056 7200 GLOUCHESTER DR MYRIAM TREPANIER EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824130030 7201 GLOUCHESTER DR ROBERT & JANICE KELLERMEIER EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.00$0.003102824140002 7200 HEATHERTON CIR GREGORY & CAROL RICHARDSON EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.003102824140007 7201 HEATHERTON CIR CYNTHIA J SMITH EDINA, MN 55435 0 $0.00$0.00310282411056 7128 HEATHERTON TRL ERIC MAYER EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.00310282411065 7129 HEATHERTON TRL FURDA RENTALS LLC EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.003102824110075 7128 LYNMAR LN WILLIAM R HELGESON EDINA, MN 55435 0.5 $3,000.00Page 137 of 668 haro Allison, Ci y Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates November 26, 2025, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for W 72nd Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. SS-538 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 26th day of Nov. 2025. Page 138 of 668 November 25, 2025 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-538 WEST 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall on Monday, Dec. 8, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for West 72nd Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2026 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2027. The estimated roadway cost is $331,500 and is funded by special assessment; the estimated cost per assessable lot is $6,000 per residential equivalent unit. The assessment can be divided over a fifteen-year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed roadway improvements includes all properties between and including: 7128-7129 Bristol Blvd, 7137 Cornelia Dr, 7128-7200 France Ave, 7136-7137 Glouchester Ave, 7128-7129 Heatherton Trl, 7128 Lynmar Ln Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Staff’s recommendations to City Council are: • Reconstruct West 72nd Street between Cornelia Drive and France Avenue to 24-feet wide with an 8-foot wide shared-use path on the south side • New concrete curb and gutter and new asphalt pavement • Maintain no on-street parking on West 72nd Street between Cornelia Drive and France Avenue • Construct a tree-landscaped median west of Lynmar Lane as a traffic calming measure • Construct a right-in/right-out median at the entrance to 7200 France Avenue • Increase size of existing sanitary sewer main from 24” to 36” • Replacement of existing watermain, water services, hydrants and valves • Storm sewer improvements to resolve local drainages issues and installation of sump drains, where feasible The Engineering Study will be available online as part of the Dec. 8 City Council meeting agenda at https://edinamn.portal.civicclerk.com; under Event Categories select City Council Meeting, click Search and you will see the Dec. 8 Agenda. Page 139 of 668 Notice of Public Hearing W 72nd Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction November 25, 2025 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Further Information: City of Edina Engineering, 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 952-826-0371 Provide Input to Engineering Staff 1 – Post questions online at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/south-trunk-sanitary- sewer for review by Engineering staff 2 – Write to City of Edina, Attention Engineering, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN 55439 Provide Public Input Share your thoughts! Public input can be provided in a variety of methods to City Council. All comments are reviewed and considered; therefore, you do not need to participate in more than one method. Public Input Options: 1 – Provide public input online at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings. (Available now) 2 – Leave a voicemail with your public input at 952-826-0377. Staff will submit the transcribed voicemail to Better Together Edina. (Available now) 3 – A public hearing will take place in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St., 6 p.m. Monday, December 8, 2025. Attend the meeting in person or watch the meeting live from home on cable channels 813 or 16 or stream live on YouTube.com/EdinaTV, or EdinaMN.gov/Meetings. Call in to provide live testimony at 312-535-8110 the night of the meeting and enter access code 2633 585 6275, password is 5454. City Council will make a decision at its meeting 7 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 16. Page 140 of 668 MAIL TO ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHYSICAL ADDRESS CURRENT RESIDENT 7128 BRISTOL BLVD EDINA, MN 55435 7128 BRISTOL BLVD CURRENT RESIDENT 7129 BRISTOL BLVD EDINA, MN 55435 7129 BRISTOL BLVD CURRENT RESIDENT 7137 CORNELIA DR EDINA, MN 55435 7137 CORNELIA DR CURRENT RESIDENT 7136 GLOUCHESTER AVE EDINA, MN 55435 7136 GLOUCHESTER AV CURRENT RESIDENT 7137 GLOUCHESTER AVE EDINA, MN 55435 7137 GLOUCHESTER AV CURRENT RESIDENT 7128 HEATHERTON TRL EDINA, MN 55435 7128 HEATHERTON TRL CURRENT RESIDENT 7129 HEATHERTON TRL EDINA, MN 55435 7129 HEATHERTON TRL CURRENT RESIDENT 7128 LYNMAR LN EDINA, MN 55435 7128 LYNMAR LN CURRENT RESIDENT 7200 BRISTOL CIR EDINA, MN 55435 7200 BRISTOL CIR CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 BRISTOL CIR EDINA, MN 55435 7201 BRISTOL CIR CURRENT RESIDENT 7203 BRISTOL CIR EDINA, MN 55435 7203 BRISTOL CIR CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 CORNELIA DR EDINA, MN 55435 7201 CORNELIA DR CURRENT RESIDENT 7200 CORNELIA DR EDINA, MN 55435 7200 CORNELIA DR CURRENT RESIDENT 7200 GLOUCHESTER DR EDINA, MN 55435 7200 GLOUCHESTER D CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 GLOUCHESTER DR EDINA, MN 55435 7201 GLOUCHESTER D CURRENT RESIDENT 7200 HEATHERTON CIR EDINA, MN 55435 7200 HEATHERTON CIR CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 HEATHERTON CIR EDINA, MN 55435 7201 HEATHERTON CIR SUNRISE EDINA ASSTD LIVING VENTAS REALTY C/O ALTUS PO BOX 808 COCKEYSVILLE, MD 7128 FRANCE FRANCE PROPERTY PA 708 5TH ST SE B-100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 57200 FRANCE Page 141 of 668 Survey Responses 03 November 2025 - 02 December 2025 Provide Public Input on Reconstruction Projects Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Page 142 of 668 Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Responded At:Dec 01, 2025 12:22:13 pm Last Seen:Dec 01, 2025 12:22:13 pm Q1.First & Last Name Ted Carlson Q2.Address 6550 York Ave #207 Q3.Which project would you like to comment on? W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Q4.PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Q5.W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION To City Staff & City Council: As the representative for the ownership group at 7200 France & 7250 France we are excited about the roadway reconstruction. Chad Millner and staff have done a very good job of communicating with us, thank you. We remain on track for fall 2026 completion for 7250 France and winter 2027 completion for 7200 France. We have the following comments/discussion points regarding the 72nd street roadway: 1) While we do not believe that the "porkchop" will drive any meaningful results to traffic, we are not opposed. 2) We understand the assessment process and agree with the calculations. 3) We will work with City Staff to further refine the sidewalk layout along 72nd. 4) We would like there to be on street parking along our "frontage" on 72nd street. We have invested significant dollars to provide bike & pedestrian trails, a plaza, and planned for a future underpass beneath France Ave. Providing on street parking options on 72nd would further activate these amenities. We strongly prefer that on street parking be incorporated into the design now. Ted Carlson Orion Investments Q6.PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Page 143 of 668 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-118 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS-538 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of November 2025, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. SS-538, the proposed improvement of W 72nd Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weekly published notices of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of December 2025, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: December 16, 2025 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 16, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Page 144 of 668 d ITEM REPORT Date: December 8, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 5.2 Prepared By: Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Engineering Item Title: PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-116 Prospect Knolls A, C & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-458 Action Requested: Motion to close the in person public hearing, keep the online public input open until noon, December 10, and continue action on the item to the December 16 City Council meeting Information/Background: Staff initiated this project. Staff proposes to reconstruct West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Kerry Road, Lanham Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Village Drive, Weston Circle, and Wexford Road. Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. Between November 26, when public hearing notices were mailed, and December 3, when this public hearing document agenda item was submitted for the December 8 City Council packet, 4 comments were received on BetterTogetherEdina.org. Public hearing input closes at noon on December 10. Resources/Financial Impacts: The overall project cost is estimated at $14,738,330. Funding will be a combination of special assessments, City Utility and Pedestrian and Cyclists Safety (PACS) funds, and property taxes. Relationship to City Policies: The project includes CIP Nos. 19-308, 19-309 and ENG23001. Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Replacing aging infrastructure at the appropriate time is sound asset management practice. Supporting Documentation: Page 145 of 668 1. 2026 Street Reconstruction Public Improvement Hearing Staff Presentation 2. Engineering Study BA-458 3. Certificate of Mailing 4. Better Together Report of Comments Received 5. Resolution No. 2025-116 Prospect Knolls A, C&D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. BA-458 Page 146 of 668 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Public Improvement Hearings December 8, 2025 Page 147 of 668 Agenda •Thank You –Residents and Council •Infrastructure Spending •Project Similarities •Multimodal Information Sharing •West 72nd Street •Prospect Knolls A, C & D •Parklawn Court Blake Road Fall 2023 Page 148 of 668 Infrastructure Spending •Budget Work Plan – Pillar #1 Strong Foundation •Infrastructure meets community needs now and in the future •Multi-Modal Transportation Network – Roads, Sidewalks, Bicycle Facilities, Mass Transit •Clean & Safe Drinking Water – Water Treatment Plants, Distribution Networks. •Sanitation – Sanitary Sewer, Wastewater •Flood Protection - Storm Sewer, Lakes, Ponds Page 149 of 668 Pavement Condition Index - Citywide Page 150 of 668 Pavement Condition Index https://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/ Page 151 of 668 Page 152 of 668 Infrastructure Asset Management Page 153 of 668 Build-outInfrastructure DividendsCommitment to ReinvestMaintenance GenerationInfrastructure Asset Management Page 154 of 668 2026 Project Areas •West 72 nd Street •Local Street •20 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •Local Streets •283 Properties •Parklawn Court •Local Street •4 Properties Page 155 of 668 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility information •Bike and ped system needs & gaps Page 156 of 668 Proposed Watermain Improvements •Replace water services project wide •Replace hydrants and gate valves project wide •Replace partial watermain •Verify appropriate hydrant spacing and add hydrants if needed to meet public safety standards •Paid for under watermain fund Page 157 of 668 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements •Spot trunk pipe repairs and cured- in-place pipe liners to reduce I&I •Replace manhole castings and rings •Paid for from sanitary sewer fund Page 158 of 668 Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements •Modifications to roadway and storm sewer to improve existing drainage issues •Replace curb and gutter •Install sump drain pipe where feasible •Paid for by the storm sewer fund Page 159 of 668 Right-of-Way Impacts •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Sod Restoration Page 160 of 668 Project Schedules Neighborhood Informational Video Presentation Various *City Council Rejects Prospect Knolls A 2020 Project January 7, 2020 Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Public Hearing Opens / Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Public Hearing Closes December 10, 2025 Public Hearing Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract / Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 Page 161 of 668 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements. Adjacent properties. •2021 Policy Change •Transition to taxes over 16 year •Covers 52.6% of roadway costs Construction Year % of Local Roadway Costs Assessed 2020 100% 2021-2024 78.90%-63.12% 2025 57.86% 2026 52.60% 2027-2035 47.34%-5.26% 2036 0% Page 162 of 668 Special Assessments •Covers 52.6% of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Gravel base •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings •Remainder of roadway costs are covered by property taxes Page 163 of 668 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence * Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties Scenario Land Use Class REU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 C Multi-Family Residential – Apartment/Condos 0.5 Page 164 of 668 19 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 165 of 668 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2025 interest rate was 4.98% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 166 of 668 Strategic Guidance •Comprehensive Plan •Race and Equity Plan •Climate Action Plan •Living Streets Plan •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan •Active Routes to School Plan Approved Plans Budget Pillars Page 167 of 668 Guiding Objectives Meet the needs of all users and abilities Provide connectivity for everyday uses Improve safety and comfort Encourage alternative transportation Page 168 of 668 Quality of Life Survey 2025 •Most liked attribute of living in Edina: Convenient location/accessibility/ walkability - 45% •Ease of travel (% excellent or good):•Overall – 84•By Car – 79•Walking – 70•Biking – 61 •Quality of city services (% excellent or good):•Condition of trails and sidewalks – 87•Sidewalk maintenance – 77 •Importance of transportation emission reduction actions such as sidewalks, bike lanes, public EV charging (% essential or very important) – 69 Page 169 of 668 Safe & Equitable Mobility Action Plan •Aimed at reducing fatal and serious injury crashes for all road users •Key themes of Phase 1 community engagement: •Streets without sidewalks increase risk for vulnerable users •Desire for safer connections to parks, transit and commercial areas, especially for children and elderly residents •Interest in physical design solutions to address vehicle speeds •Delays in sidewalk implementation have long-term impacts on health and mobility Page 170 of 668 Proposed Improvements Meet the needs of all users and abilities Provide connectivity for everyday usesImprove safety and comfort Encourage alternative transportation Page 171 of 668 EdinaMN.gov Prospect Knolls A, C & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Page 172 of 668 Project Details –Prospect Knolls A, C and D •283 properties (231.67 REUs) •3.20 miles of road •45,263 square yards of street pavement Page 173 of 668 Proposed Watermain Improvements •Install 12” watermain from West 70 th Street to Gleason Road •Existing Utility Easement •Replace 6” watermain on Dublin Circle •Replace 6” watermain on Lanham Lane •Upgrade 1.5” watermain in cul-de-sacs to 6” watermain Page 174 of 668 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements •Replace undersized West 70th Street sanitary sewer pipe with 8” pipe and associated services Page 175 of 668 Existing Roadways Conditions •Streets originally constructed between the 1950’s and 1980’s •Majority of streets constructed in 1960-70’s •Existing street widths vary between 24-ft and 30-ft •Average width 28-ft •Primarily silty sandy soils with some clay soils Page 176 of 668 Existing Roadways Conditions •City of Edina Network Average Pavement Condition Index –78 •Prospect Knolls A/C/D – 25 Page 177 of 668 Proposed Roadway Improvements •Street widths will vary throughout the project area •Majority 27’ wide •Majority no parking changes •Exceptions Page 178 of 668 Proposed Roadway Improvements •Kerry Road and Down Road intersection •Traffic Safety Committee •Intersection geometry •Double yellow striping •Hairpin curve signing •One-sided parking on Kerry Road Page 179 of 668 Roadway Typical Section – No Sidewalk Streets •Existing •26’ to 30’ (28’ average) road width•Two -sided parking •Proposed •27’ road width•Reduce street widths by 0-3’ •Two -sided parking •Exceptions •Kerry Road•24’ width •One-sided parking •Village Drive•30’ width •Two -sided parking Page 180 of 668 Prospect Knolls A, C & D – Existing Multi-Modal Facilities Sidewalk on 70th St W Sidewalk on Dewey Hill Rd Sidewalk on Cahill Rd Sidewalk on Gleason Rd Lewis Park Path Sidewalk on Antrim Rd Page 181 of 668 Prospect Knolls A, C & D – Existing Multi-Modal Facilities •None within project area •Metro Transit Local Routes 6 and 540 stop within ½ mile •Cahill Rd, Dewey Hill Rd •Accessible by existing sidewalks Page 182 of 668 Prospect Knolls A, C & D – Recommended Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan: •Sidewalk on parts of Shannon Drive, Kemrich Drive and Lanham Lane, all of Fleetwood Drive •Does not include a connection to Lewis Park Trail Page 183 of 668 Prospect Knolls A, C & D – Proposed Pedestrian Facilities •Seeking to balance strategic goals, resident feedback and construction impacts •Sidewalk Streets •Shannon Drive (east side) •Kemrich Drive (north side) •Fleetwood Drive (west side) •Lanham Lane (south/west side) •Proposed facilities will improve access to parks, schools and transit •Allows for connection from north to south •McGuire, Lewis and Braemar Parks •Valley View Middle and Edina High Schools •Maintenance by residents Page 184 of 668 Roadway Typical Section – Sidewalk Streets •Existing •27.5’ road width •Two -sided parking •Proposed •24’ road width •Reduce street widths by 3.5’ •One-sided parking •5’ sidewalk •0-5’ grass boulevard Page 185 of 668 Transportation Commission Review •Support proposed sidewalks •Suggested extending the sidewalk one block north on Shannon Dr •Suggested including intersection of 70th St and Antrim Rd to extend westbound bike lane •Concerned about resident opposition at 11th hour Page 186 of 668 Transportation Commission Review •Voted unanimously to endorse the proposed improvements as presented and recommended additional analysis of the 70th St and Antrim Rd intersection for a potential demonstration project Page 187 of 668 Petition Against Sidewalks on Fleetwood Dr & Lanham Ln •Signed by 45 residents representing 33 properties •71% of properties on Fleetwood/Lanham •73% of properties adjacent to proposed sidewalks on Fleetwood/Lanham •“We believe this project poses significant concerns regarding property rights, financial burdens, and safety issues” Page 188 of 668 Petition Against Sidewalks on Fleetwood Dr & Lanham Ln Safety Concerns Petition Staff Response •Low traffic volume •291 vpd; 28.1 mph 85% speed (Fleetwood Dr, 2024) •Absence of any significant safety concerns •Multiple accidents on Lanham Ln •One reported crash in last 10 years •One Traffic Safety request related to speeding and “cut- thru” traffic (Fleetwood Dr, 2023) •Sidewalk and narrower streets could increase safety risks •Reduced lane width encourages slower speeds, allows space for dedicated ped/bike facilities Source: Minnesota Department of Public Safety Page 189 of 668 Petition Against Sidewalks on Fleetwood Dr & Lanham Ln Private Property Rights Petition Staff Response •Proposed sidewalks will encroach on private property •Sidewalks will be constructed in public right-of-way •Potential damage to irrigation systems •Proposed utility and curb work will already impact irrigation systems and be replaced •Steep driveways on west side of Fleetwood Dr •Reducing lane width minimizes construction impacts •Staff will work with individual property owners on exact construction limits 60’ Page 190 of 668 Petition Against Sidewalks on Fleetwood Dr & Lanham Ln Financial Burdens Petition Staff Response •Increase maintenance responsibilities, including snow removal •Consistent with Sidewalk Maintenance Policy •City does not have resources to maintain all sidewalks •Liability concerns •Sidewalks unmaintained by the City are the responsibility of adjacent property owners •Potential increase in property taxes or assessments •Construction costs are not included in special assessment•Many factors contribute to property valuation Page 191 of 668 Estimated Project Costs *Includes concrete curb and gutter •Engineering, clerical, finance costs and contingency included Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway – District 1 $1,114,730 Special Assessments Roadway – District 2 $1,484,100 Special Assessments Roadway – District 3 $68,000 Special Assessments Roadway $3,970,500 Property Taxes Roadway Total:$6,637,330 Sanitary Sewer $1,406,100 Watermain $2,955,900 Storm Sewer *$3,460,400 Utility Total:$7,822,400 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total:$278,600 PACS Fund Project Total:$14,738,330 Page 192 of 668 Assessments Districts – Prospect Knolls •Disparity in potential benefit •3 Separate Districts Page 193 of 668 Market Benefit Estimate •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm •District 1•Properties could see an average price benefit of: $20,000 to $25,000 per lot •District 2•Properties could see an average price benefit of: $15,000 to $20,000 per lot •District 3•Properties could see an average price benefit of:•$1,500 to $2,500 per townhome•$1,000 to $1,750 per condo Page 194 of 668 Estimated Roadway Assessments – District 1 •61 properties (58.67 REUs) 1 REU per single-family home 0.5 REU for corner properties •$1,114,730 / 58.67 REUs = $19,000 per REU  ($41,600 without policy change) Page 195 of 668 Estimated Roadway Assessments – District 2 •159 properties (153 REUs) 1 REU per single-family home 0.5 REU for corner properties •$1,484,100 / 153 REUs = $9,700 per REU  ($23,400 without policy change) Page 196 of 668 Estimated Roadway Assessments – District 3 •63 properties (20 REUs) 0.5 REU per multi-family unit 0.25 REU for corner properties •$68,000 / 20 REUs = $3,400 per REU $1,700 per townhome/condo ($4,100 without policy change) Page 197 of 668 Recommendation •Reminder - Approving Pedestrian Improvements requires a minimum of 3 out of 5 Council votes in favor to pass •Staff believes this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure •Motion to close the public hearing at noon, December 10,and to continue action on the item to the December 16 City Council meeting. (Improvement No. BA-458) Page 198 of 668 Thank you for your time! Page 199 of 668 ENGINEERING STUDY PROSPECT KNOLLS A, C, & D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Kerry Road, Lanham Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Village Drive, Weston Circle, Wexford Road IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 December 1, 2025 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 42003 12/1/25 Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Page 200 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local bituminous streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, installation of new concrete curb and gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalks, lining of sanitary sewer, localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. Watermain improvements adjacent to the Dublin Reservoir (located along Dublin Road) are also included in this project that will increase the efficiency of the reservoir. The estimated total project cost is $14,738,330. 47.40% of the roadway costs will be funded through property taxes and 52.60% will be funded through special assessments at the following rates per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $7,822,400 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are estimated to cost $278,600 and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure” and the “Strong Foundations” City budget goal. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian facilities. LOCATION: The project includes West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Kerry Road, Lanham Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Village Drive, Weston Circle, and Wexford Road. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Assessment District Preliminary Assessment per REU 1 $19,000 2 $9,700 3 $3,400 Page 201 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 3 Figure 1: Project Area Map Page 202 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The roadways in the Prospect Knolls A, C, and D neighborhood were originally constructed between 1958 and 1990 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood, 1969 Approximately 2/3 of roadways in the project area have existing curb and gutter, primarily the streets east of and including Antrim Court, Antrim Terrace and Shannon Drive. The average roadway width is 28 feet (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb or edge of pavement). The roadways located south and west of Village Drive are privately owned and maintained. A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area shows the roadway section varies from 1.75 inches to 8 inches of bituminous pavement and 3.0 inches to 23.75 inches of aggregate base, over a poorly graded sand and silty sand base. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is Page 203 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 5 78 and the average PCI for Prospect Knolls A/C/D is 25. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition The existing geometry of the intersections at Kerry Road/Wexford Road and Wexford Road/Down Road creates a large radius and wide pavement on the southeast side of Wexford Road between the Down Road and Kerry Road intersections. This allows southbound vehicles on Kerry Road that turn onto Wexford Avenue and then take an immediate left onto Down Road to comfortably maneuver through the two intersections at speeds higher than typical or desirable for conventional intersections. The existing geometry of this intersection is shown in Figure 2. Page 204 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 6 Figure 2: Kerry Rd/Wexford Rd and Wexford Rd/Down Rd Intersections (Existing Conditions) The intersection of Down Road and Lee Valley Road is currently not centered in the right-of-way and City employees have stated the intersection is hard to maneuver with snow plows. The existing geometry of this intersection is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Down Rd / Lee Valley Rd Intersection (Existing Conditions) Page 205 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 7 Driveways There are many unique driveways throughout the project area which include brick pavers, colored concrete and heated driveways. Photo 3 shows an example of a driveway with brick pavers in the project area. Photo 3: Brick Paver Driveway Cul-de-Sacs There are nine cul-de-sacs within the project area. Six (Antrim Court, Antrim Terrace, Dublin Circle, Shannon Drive, Tara Road and Weston Circle), have existing curb and gutter. Two (Antrim Court and Shannon Drive), have center islands that contain trees, boulders and landscaping. Four cul-de-sacs’ diameters are smaller than the City’s standard diameter of 70’ and four are larger than the standard diameter. Traffic and Crash Data Staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at several locations within or near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes within the neighborhood range between 291 and 754 vehicles per day with 85th percentile speeds between 25.2 and 29 miles per hour. Traffic and crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Landscaping Numerous property owners have landscaping within the right of way. Many of these landscape items are located directly behind the curb. Some of these landscape items will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary reconstruction work. Photo 4 shows a typical landscaping feature found in the project’s right of way. Page 206 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 8 Photo 4: Landscaping within ROW Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no pedestrian facilities within the project area. There are existing sidewalks immediately adjacent to the project area on Dewey Hill Road, West 70th Street, Antrim Road and Cahill Road. (see Appendix B). Additionally, a trail exists around Lewis Park adjacent to the project area, including a trail entrance spur at the intersection of Kemrich Drive and Tara Road. Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area; however, there are existing bike lanes immediately adjacent to the project area on Antrim Road, West 70th Street and Cahill Road (see Appendix C). Transit Facilities There are no transit facilities within the project area. Metro Transit’s Local Routes 6 and 540 operate within ½ mile of the project area on Cahill Rd and Dewey Hill Rd. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 8-12” vitrified clay pipe (VCP), 8 inch cast iron pipe (CIP), and 8” polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC), installed between 1958 and 1990. The Shannon Drive sanitary sewer main was replaced in 2006 between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive. Part of the sanitary sewer system alignment extends through rear and side yards within an existing utility easement between Wexford Road and Gleason Road. Page 207 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 9 Historical records indicate there has been a significant number of sewer back-ups or blockages in the area. (see Appendix D). There is no sanitary sewer main along W 70th Street. An unknown sized sanitary sewer service pipe conveys wastewater for properties between 7001 Dublin Road and the intersection of W 70th Street and Antrim Road. Watermain The watermain system consists of 6 inch cast iron pipe (CIP), ductile iron pipe (DIP), and high density polyethylene (HDPE), with the exception of 16 inch cast iron pipe (CIP) that is located on W 70th Street, and 1.5 inch copper pipe located on Antrim Court, and Antrim Terrace, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Wexford Road. All watermain pipe was installed between 1958 and 2006. Part of the watermain system alignment extends through side yards within an existing utility easement between Dublin Circle and Erin Terrace. The overall system has experienced eight watermain breaks (see Appendix D). Most of the fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood. A small number of homes in the neighborhood were constructed prior to the availability of municipal water. Although several have had private wells properly sealed, City records suggest 3 wells are in use for irrigation, 2 are active domestic water wells, and twelve have a status of ‘unknown’. Storm Sewer The storm sewer system consists of 12 inch – 54 inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), 12 inch high density polyethylene (HDPE), and 12 inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP). All storm sewer pipe was installed between 1969 and 2013. Two 12” CMPs are located within rear and side yard drainage and utility easements. One between the Wexford Road cul de sac and Gleason Road, the other between Dublin Circle and Tupa Drive. Additional sections of unknown pipe size and material also exist within the storm sewer system. There are many storm sewer inlets and pipes located throughout the project area. All storm sewer within the project area drains south, eventually making its way to Lewis Park, or to West 70th Street, where it drains to Nine Mile Creek. Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications, cable and fiber optic utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are a combination of overhead and underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. Street lighting within the project area consists of standard “cobra head” fixtures mounted on wooden poles and lantern-style fixtures mounted on fiberglass poles as shown in Appendix E. All lighting is owned by Xcel Energy. Page 208 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 10 DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendix B, a sidewalk is proposed along Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive, Kemrich Drive between Shannon Drive and Fleetwood Drive, Fleetwood Drive, and Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street. Appendix C shows no proposed bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality, and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place pipe liners. This project will also reduce inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. Page 209 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 11 Water Resource Management Plan (December 2022 Amendment) Municipal stormwater systems provide multiple functions, including runoff management (removal of stormwater) and flood risk reduction. The system is composed of structural or engineered control devices and facilities to treat, convey, or store polluted stormwater. Enhancing public infrastructure by building new, retrofitting old, and maintaining existing in working condition is a key action to reducing flood exposure. City Council adopted the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy in 2020, and it was incorporated into the Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) by major amendment. The primary goal for the City’s flood risk reduction effort is to improve public safety and reduce the exposure of private principal structures to flooding. It is the City’s standard practice to provide a 10-percent-annual-chance level of service and 1-percent-annual-chance level (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency events, respectively) of protection for principal structures for the City’s stormwater conveyance systems, where feasible. The WRMP identified three areas of flood inundation within the project area for both the 10-percent and 1-percent-annual-chance flood event (also referred to as the 10- year and 100-year frequency event, respectively). The first area is along Antrim Court, shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Antrim Court Flood Zone (SWP_52) Page 210 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 12 This modeled inundation area appears to impact the boulevard and structure at 2 Antrim Terrace. Approximately 8.2 acres of stormwater from the neighboring properties drains to the City’s storm sewer system in this area, which flows east towards Shannon Drive, and eventually drains to Lewis Park. The primary overflow location of this inundation area is to the southwest towards 5912 Lee Valley Road. The second area is a pond adjacent to Tara Road (see Figure 5). Figure 5: Tara Road Flood Zone (SWP_34) The Southwest Ponds watershed, including the Tara Road pond, encompasses approximately 411 acres. The Southwest Ponds watershed is characterized by a series of ponding basins that outlet to the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek via a storm sewer system that travels south from the intersection of West 78th Street and Delaney Boulevard and discharges to a detention pond north of I-494. Discharge from this detention pond flows beneath I-494 and enters the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek. Page 211 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 13 The 1-percent and 10-percent-annual-chance events could impact the structures at 7315 Tara Road and 5640 Dewey Hill Road, as well as the east boulevard along Tara Road. Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 1-percent and 10- percent-annual-chance events. The third area along Kemrich Drive and Shannon Drive as shown in Figure 6. Figure 6: Kemrich Drive and Shannon Drive Flood Zone (SWP_53, 66) This modeled inundation area impacts the roadway section of Kemrich Drive and both the roadway and backyard sections of Shannon Drive. This area is connected to the City’s storm sewer system that runs from Kemrich Drive to the Southwest Ponds series of basins. The primary overflow location of this inundation area is to the east at the shared property line of 5721 and 5717 Kemrich Drive. Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 1-percent and 10-percent- annual-chance events. Climate Action Plan The CAP identified the following strategies that align with this roadway reconstruction project. Transportation and Land Use (TL) 1: Decrease community-wide vehicle miles traveled by 7% by 2030. Action TL 1-2: Accelerate building on-street and off-street protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas and fill connectivity gaps as identified in the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Page 212 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 14 TL 2: Double public transit commuter ridership from 3.3% to 6.6% by 2030. Staff Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They support replacement of concrete curb and gutter, as well as replacement of deficient watermain components (including fire hydrants, gate valves and water services). Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements. They noted that temporary fire hydrants should be consistent in style for ease of access, that emergency access should always be maintained during construction and that drive widths and turnarounds should meet local design guidelines. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 23, 2025, a draft engineering study was provided for review. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix G. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to numerous in person or virtual open houses between September 2017 and August 2025. Residents were invited to an informational presentation and were able to directly ask questions to staff in August 2025. Residents were notified of a recorded video version of the August 2025 informational presentation posted on the Better Together Edina website, where residents were able to ask questions to staff from the Better Together Edina website, as well as telephone and email. Materials from the August 2025 informational presentation can be found in Appendix H. On June 25, 2025, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation and local drainage problems within the project area. The questionnaire was completed by 81 of 283 property owners, a return rate of 29%. The following is a summary of feedback received from residents: • 27 of 81 (33%*) were concerned or very concerned with the speed of traffic in the neighborhood; 54 (67%) were not concerned. • 10 of 81 (12%*) were concerned or very concerned with the volume of traffic or number of vehicles in the neighborhood; 70 (88%) were not concerned. • 24 of 81 (30%*) concerned or very concerned with motorist behavior in the neighborhood; 57 (70%) were not concerned. • 40 of 81 (49%) identified an unsafe intersection within the neighborhood. • 61 of 81 (75%) walk, run, or jog in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 23 of 81 (28%) ride a bicycle in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. Page 213 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 15 • 7 of 81 (9%) reported parking on the street at least 2-3 times per week; 59 (73%) reported parking on the street less than once per month. • 12 of 81 (15%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood. *Percentages based on number of returned surveys The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix I. Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix J. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. The proposed improvements also align with the Budget Work Plan values and goals developed by the City Council and staff. Roadways Typical Section The bituminous roadways are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. The existing bituminous pavement and suitable aggregate material will be recycled for use as base material in the new roadway where feasible. A minimum of 8” of aggregate base material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous non-wear and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. Significant subgrade removals may occur where areas of clay soils are present. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. All roadways within the project area are designated as Local Streets in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have concrete curb and gutter and a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalks or 24’ with a 5’ sidewalk on one side; bicycle facilities are optional. Local streets that vary from the guidelines are as follows: • Kerry Road will be reconstructed to a 24-foot width to minimize impacts on mature trees and existing retaining walls, and to account for the steep slopes present in the boulevards. • Village Drive will be reconstructed to 30 feet to accommodate additional parking and to match the privately owned and maintained street widths south and west of Village Drive. Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. Page 214 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 16 One-sided parking is proposed on Fleetwood Drive, Kemrich Drive, Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Fleetwood Drive, and Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street due to the proposed pedestrian facilities (see pedestrian facilities below). One-sided parking is also proposed on Kerry Drive due to the proposed 24’ street width. Given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that parking changes should not occur on any other streets in the project area. The existing and proposed street widths and parking recommendations are shown in Figure 7 through 10 and Table 1. Figure 7: Streets with sidewalk: Shannon Drive between Dewey Hill Road and Kemrich Drive, Kemrich Drive, Fleetwood Drive, and Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street Page 215 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 17 Figure 8: Streets without sidewalk: West 70th Street, Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Lanham Lane between Kemrich Drive and Fleetwood Lane, Lee Valley Circle, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive north of Kemrich Drive, Tara Road, Tralee Drive, Weston Circle, Wexford Road Page 216 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 18 Figure 9: Kerry Road Figure 10: Village Drive Page 217 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 19 Street Name Existing Roadway Width¹ (face to face), feet Existing Curb Type Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Sidewalk, feet Boulevard Width, feet Proposed Parking W. 70th St 25-27 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Antrim Ct 27 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Antrim Rd 26-28 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Antrim Ter 27 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Down Rd 26-30 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Dublin Cir 29.5 B618 27 - - Two-sided Dublin Rd 25-28 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Fleetwood Dr 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Kemrich Dr 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Kerry Rd 24-26 N/A 24 - - One-sided Lanham Ln between Kemrich Dr and Fleetwood Dr. 27.5 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Lanham Ln between Fleetwood Dr. and W. 70th St. 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Lee Valley Cir 29.5 B618 27 - - Two-sided Lee Valley Rd 28-30 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Shannon Dr, between Dewey Hill Rd and Kemrich Dr 27.5 Surmountable 24 5 0-5 One-sided Shannon Dr north of Kemrich Dr 27.5 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Tara Rd 27 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Tralee Dr 29-30 N/A 27 - - Two-sided Village Dr 29.5 B618 30 - - Two-sided Weston Cir 27.5 Surmountable 27 - - Two-sided Wexford Rd 24-28 N/A 27 - - Two-sided ¹Existing roadway width is measured from edge of bituminous to edge of bituminous on streets with no curb and gutter Table 1: Street Widths and Parking The intersections of Kerry Road/Wexford Road and Wexford Road/Down Road are proposed to closely match the existing geometry, with changes limited to about one or two feet. A double yellow pavement marking stripe will be added to the intersections, discouraging drivers from crossing over the centerline. Page 218 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 20 The proposed geometry of the Down Road and Lee Valley Road intersection is shown in Figure 11. The proposed roadway will move west from its existing location to be more centered within the right of way. However, the roadway may only move approximately 1–3 feet due to existing retaining walls and power pole guy wires on the west and southwest side of the roadway. The widths of Down Road and Lee Valley Road are proposed to be 27 feet from face of curb to face of curb. The width of the roadway through the curve is proposed to be 30 feet in order to help snow plow drivers maneuver the turn easier. The southern curb line through the curve is proposed to receive surmountable curb so snow plows can safely and easily push snow into the boulevard. Figure 11: Proposed Down Rd/Lee Valley Rd Intersection Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs will conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Driveways Driveways will be affected by construction and will be reconstructed. The unique driveways throughout the project area, including brick pavers, will be re-laid with the intent to replicate existing conditions to the extent practicable. Heated driveways have historically not been able to be restored during roadway reconstruction projects. These systems are typically continuous, and removal of even a small portion of the driveway (e.g., 10 feet) can compromise the entire heating system. Splicing or reconnecting existing heating elements, tubes, or mats is generally not feasible once the system has been disturbed. Cul-de-Sacs Due to the location of existing retaining walls, utility poles, large trees, and available right-of-way, no significant change to the size and geometrics of the cul-de-sacs are Page 219 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 21 proposed. Minor geometric changes are proposed to allow for better turning movements where feasible. Landscaping Any landscaping disturbed by construction will be replaced with the intent to replicate existing conditions to the extent practicable. Multi-Modal Transportation Staff seeks to balance the recommendations of the City’s guiding documents (Living Streets Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan), feedback from affected residents, available right-of-way and potential tree and infrastructure impacts. Staff is proposing new sidewalks on the following streets as recommended in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan: • The east side of Shannon Dr from Dewey Hill Rd to Kemrich Dr • The north side of Kemrich Dr from Shannon Dr to Fleetwood Dr • The west side of Fleetwood Dr, and • The south / west side of Lanham Ln between Fleetwood Dr and W 70th St Staff is also proposing a new sidewalk on the north side of Kemrich Dr between Fleetwood Dr and Tara Rd. This sidewalk is not included in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, but will connect the other proposed sidewalks to the trail at Lewis Park. Figure 12 shows all existing and proposed pedestrian facilities (also detailed in Table 1 above). Page 220 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 22 Figure 12: Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities The benefits of these sidewalks include: • Connection to existing and proposed multi-modal facilities on Dewey Hill Rd and W 70th St • Improving access to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School • Improving access to Lewis Park • Improving access to adjacent transit facilities Locations were selected by staff based on existing topography, connections to existing facilities and private utility conflicts, and maintenance. The grass boulevards that will separate the new curb and the proposed sidewalks is proposed to be 5’- wide but may vary depending on construction conflicts. Separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. The extra width needed for the sidewalks and boulevards will be balanced between both sides of the street, where feasible. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and portions of the existing sidewalks will be reconstructed as necessary. Page 221 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 23 As the proposed sidewalk segments are not along Municipal State Aid routes, adjacent to City property nor included in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan, they will be maintained by the adjacent property owners per our sidewalk maintenance policy. On December 2, City Council received a formal resident petition against the proposed sidewalks on Lanham Lane and Fleetwood Drive (see Appendix K). The petition was signed by 45 property owners representing 33 properties within the project area. On Fleetwood Drive and Lanham Road north of Kemrich Drive (where a sidewalk is proposed), 30 of 42 properties (71%) signed the petition. Of the properties along the side of the street where the sidewalk is proposed, 16 of 22 properties (73%) signed the petition. Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities in this project area. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks, offset pipes, and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. New trunk sanitary sewer pipe is proposed along W 70th Street between 7001 Dublin Road and the intersection of W 70th Street and Antrim Road. This new pipe will connect to the existing manhole at the intersection of W 70th Street and Antrim Road. Sanitary sewer services will be connected as needed. All sanitary manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of storm water. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain within the project area, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. Watermain will be replaced using a combination of pipe bursting and open cut methods along the following streets. 1. Dublin Circle between West 70th Street and Erin Terrace. 2. Lanham Lane between Fleetwood Drive and West 70th Street. There are proposed watermain improvements adjacent to the Dublin Reservoir (located on Dublin Road) which include installing 12 inch and 16 inch watermain. These improvements are part of the City of Edina’s Water Supply Plan to optimize water flow for firefighting and improve water quality. The watermain improvements between the reservoir and Gleason Road have been amended from the Water Supply Plan, changing from 16 inch to 12 inch watermain pipe. This change is due to the refinement of the design, based on the preferred alignment and trying to limit the pipe size. The new 12 inch watermain design will still provide the desired level of service. Page 222 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 24 The proposed 12 inch watermain, located between the reservoir and Gleason Road, will be installed via open-cut and Horizontal Directional Drill (HDD) methods. The open-cut installation will occur between the reservoir and Wexford Road cul de sac (via Dublin Road, Kerry Road, and Wexford Road). This proposed 12 inch DIP watermain will replace the existing 6 inch DIP watermain and 1.5 inch copper pipe along this route. HDD installation will occur from the Wexford Road cul de sac to Gleason Road within the existing drainage and utility easement owned by the City. Watermain installation via HDD is proposed 12 inch high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. The 16 inch watermain adjacent to the reservoir is proposed between the reservoir and Antrim Road, along W 70th Street, via open-cut installation method. The proposed 16 inch DIP watermain will replace the existing 16 inch CIP along this route. Echologics, LLC could not confirm if the wall thickness of the existing watermain pipe had decreased since it was installed. Upsizing the watermain will increase the pumping efficiency of the Dublin Reservoir. The 1.5 inch copper trunk pipe along Antrim Court, Antrim Terrace and Tera Road will be removed and replaced with 6 inch DIP, while the 1.5 inch copper trunk pipe along Wexford Road will be removed and replaced with 12 inch DIP. Water service leads will be extended to properties that do not have existing water services, and all existing water service leads to properties will be replaced. All gate valves and fire hydrants and, if needed, additional hydrants will be installed to meet current public safety standards. The new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. As part of the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan, staff routinely engages property owners who have unsealed private wells and encourage them to have them properly sealed. Storm Sewer Based on the scope of utility work, concrete curb and gutter will be replaced throughout the project, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. New concrete curb and gutter will be installed along the existing streets without concrete curb. The storm sewer network will have modifications to resolve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. CMP pipe is proposed to be replaced as necessary. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. The 12 inch corrugated metal storm sewer pipes (CMP) located inside two separate the existing drainage and utility easements are proposed to be rehabilitated via cured- in-place pipe (CIPP) methods. It has been determined that lining the pipe is feasible and can be completed without drastically impacting the capacity of the pipe. Page 223 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 25 Figure 4 showed the 10-year and 100-year flood zone inundation area impacting the boulevard and structure at 2 Antrim Terrace. The City’s stormwater modeling consultant, Barr Engineering, stated that a large retaining wall separating the flood inundation area and the structure provides enough of a barrier between the two that impact to the structure is unlikely. Barr Engineering believes this area provides a benefit by temporarily storing the stormwater. It is proposed to investigate this area’s primary overflow location for signs of erosion, and repair if necessary. It is anticipated that the area of flood inundation at Kemrich Drive and Tara Road can be addressed as part of a future project at Lewis Park. Staff will engage in further discussions with Barr Engineering to determine whether to consider: 1. Installing drainage structures and / or storage basin systems at various locations to increase storm sewer capacity. 2. Increasing the Kemrich Drive storm sewer pipe size. 3. Reducing flood risk exposure to primary structures with fiscally responsible options, including storm sewer pipe and / or raising or lowering roadway elevations. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on November 18, 2025, to discuss the proposed 2026 reconstruction projects and preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. RIGHT-OF-WAY/ EASEMENTS: Existing right-of-way in this neighborhood varies from 40’ to 60’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW; temporary construction easements may be required for utility improvements within existing permanent easements. Many properties have special mailboxes, retaining walls, vegetation, boulders or other landscaped items within the right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed to complete the necessary work. Page 224 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 26 PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $14,738,330 (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway – Assessment District 1 $1,114,730 Special Assessments Roadway – Assessment District 2 $1,484,100 Special Assessments Roadway – Assessment District 3 $68,000 Special Assessments Roadway $3,970,500 Property Taxes Roadway Total: $6,637,330 Sanitary Sewer $1,406,100 Watermain $2,955,900 Storm Sewer $3,460,400 Utility Total: $7,822,400 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total: $278,600 PACS Fund Project Total: $14,738,330 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 231.67 roadway residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Prospect Knolls A/C/D project area. 47.40% of the roadway costs will be funded through property taxes and 52.60% will be funded through special assessments The estimated assessment per REU is shown in Table 3, and the assessment districts are shown in Figure 13. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix L. Table 3: Summary of Total REUs and Assessments Assessment District REUs Preliminary Assessment per REU 1 58.67 $19,000 2 153 $9,700 3 20 $3,400 ($1,700 per condo unit) Page 225 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 27 Figure 13: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map All single-family residential properties located entirely within the project area receive an assessment of 1 REU, except for the properties shown in the tables below. There are 13 single-family residential properties located in the project limits that have been previously assessed a partial REU or are corner lots with an adjacent street that will be assessed with a future project. Tables 4 and 5 show their REU calculations based on the City’s assessment policy. Page 226 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 28 Table 4: Single-Family Residential Corner Properties with Future Additional Assessment Table 5: Previously Assessed Single-Family Residential Two-Sided Properties Table 6 shows there are 32 single unit multi-family residential properties located in the project limits that will receive an assessment of 0.5 REUs based on the City’s assessment policy. PID Address Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU Varies 5511- 5555 VILLAGE DR Multi-Family (32 units) 1.0 0.5 0.5 Table 6: Single Unit Multi-Family Residential Properties Table 7 shows there are 16 single unit multi-family residential properties located in the project limits that will receive an assessment of 0.5 REUs based on the City’s assessment policy. PID House Number Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU 0511621330085 5900 70TH ST W Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210053 7001 ANTRIM RD Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621240004 5820 DEWEY HILL RD Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621240005 5824 DEWEY HILL RD Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210014 7000 LANHAM LA Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210022 7001 LANHAM LA Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210009 7000 LEE VALLEY CIR Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210002 7001 LEE VALLEY CIR Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210012 7012 LEE VALLEY CIR Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621210006 7021 LEE VALLEY CIR Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621120126 7000 WESTON CIR Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 0811621120137 7001 WESTON CIR Corner Lot 1 0.5 0.5 PID House Number Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU 0811621230030 7117 TRALEE DR Prospect Knolls B – 2015 1 0.67 0.67 Page 227 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 29 PID Address Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU Varies 5501 VILLAGE DR Multi-Family (16 units) 0.5 0.5 0.25 Table 7: Single Unit Multi-Family Residential Corner Properties There are 2 city owned properties located within the project limits. Table 8 shows their REU calculations based on the City’s current assessment policy. PID House Number Street Description Comments Proposed REU 0811621220027 7000 DUBLIN RD Dublin Reservoir Not developable due to utility. 0 0811621130012 24 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Tara Road Pond Not developable with current zoning and flood plain restrictions. 0 Table 8: City-Owned Properties There are 15 garage units at 5501 Village Drive with unique PID numbers that will not be assessed. The multifamily units along West 70th Street will not be assessed. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the past and future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Open House (all 2019/2020 projects) September 25, 2017 Neighborhood Open House (all 2020/2021 projects) September 24, 2018 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (all 2020 projects) August 12, 2019 Public Hearing (all 2020 projects) December 9, 2019 City Council Rejects Prospect Knolls A 2020 Project January 7, 2020 Neighborhood Informational Video Presentations (all 2024 and Future projects) Fall 2022 Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Open Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Close Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2025 Public Improvement Hearing Council Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 Page 228 of 668 Engineering Study Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-458 December 1, 2025 30 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2026 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Prospect Knolls A, C, and D neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Traffic and Crash Data B. Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Street Lights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H. Neighborhood Informational Presentation Materials I. Resident Questionnaire J. Correspondence from Residents K. Petition Against Sidewalk L. Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 229 of 668 APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Page 230 of 668 Prospect Knolls Traffic Counts DatePeak85% SpeedADTLocation September 201936 – 2:30 PMN/A332W 70th September 2019 August 2001 43 – 3:30 PMN/A 26.2 MPH 395 622 Antrim Rd September 201933 – 3:30 PMN/A307Lee Valley Rd September 201976 – 5:00 PM28.4 MPH754Shannon Dr May 202430 – 3:15 PM28.1 MPH291Fleetwood Dr July 2007 July 2007 57 – 5:00 50 – 6:00 28.2 MPH 25.2 MPH 577 539 Lanham Ln May 2011N/A29 MPH378KemrichDr Page 231 of 668 Traffic Safety Requests May 2018-Present 1 2 3 Under reviewStop sign visibilityMarch 20251 No actionStop signMarch 20222 No actionCut thru/speed complaintsApril 20233 Page 232 of 668 Reported Crashes 2015-Present DateInfoCrash Type# July 2020Driver fleeing policeSideswipe – No injuries1 August 2018Drunk driverRan off road2 January 2017Icy roadwayRan off road – property damage3 1 2 3 Page 233 of 668 APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Page 234 of 668 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree kNineMileCree kNine Mile Creek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use PathExisting Sidewalk Proposed Shared-Use PathProposed SidewalkProposed Twin Loops Page 235 of 668 APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map Page 236 of 668 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree k NineMileCreek Ni ne Mile Cre ek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use Path Proposed Shared-Use Path Proposed Twin Loops Advisory Bike Lane Existing Bike Boulevard Bikeable ShoulderExisting Shared Bike LaneExisting Bike LaneExisting Buffered Bike Lane Proposed Bike BoulevardProposed Bike LaneProposed Buffered Bike Lane Page 237 of 668 APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks Page 238 of 668 7317 7250 7215 8 7224 7100 7308 7024 5420 5905 7017 7431 54155809 7004 5712 7150-60 5526-38 5510-24 5515-235525-35 5537-45 5540-54 5556-70 5 5 7 2 -8 4 5 5 4 7 -5 9 5500-08 7175 5545-5539 7101-15 7401 7200 6 2 5901 4 7000 7100 7000 7012 7017-29 7121 7012 7202 7104 7140 7009 7100-12 7305 5501 7100 7028 5912 7016 7020 7024 7016 7101 7105 7300 7104 5900 7070-82 7205 7117 7028 5809 7037 7016 7005 7001 7209 7008 70217020 7021 7141 5908 5920 5912 5813 7145 7301 7024 7205 7001 6013 7013 5416 7017 6909 7460 7119 6982 5601 5900 7005 5904 7012 6832 7011 5517 7109 5812 5905 7115 7032 7000 7115 5432 7137 6005 7401 5721 7105 7019 7221 7400 6012 6986 5916 7304 7009 7121 7101 70217001 6009 7009 7201 7001 7123 7308 5605 7001 7312 7033 7201 6994 6916 7008 7017 5600 5829 7401 7101 6920 7013 5532 7015 6909 6913 5804 7041 7019 7305 7209 5601 5808 7023 6005 5729 7220 5524 5805 58085812 5604 7115 5800 7020 7310 6998 5816 6836 7029 5812 5716 5617 7012 7131 7302 5805 6912 5801 5616 5528 5725 7109 7309 7208 5920 7301 7009 7129 7109 6990 7000 5708 5833 7125 7309 5609 7128 7315 5613 7212 7005 5704 7100 5705 56085612 7012 7015 7220 5816 7313 7021 7028 5716 57175801 7022 7216 7122 5713 7200 7304 7220 7305 5800 5709 5708 5721 5712 7020 7013 7225 7001 7015 5820 5720 5820 7001 5912 7301 5700 7000 7004 7212 7306 7305 7300 7313 5701 5640731260007209 7308 7025 6112 7308 7204 5920 7100 7040 5805 7133 7215 7224 7219 5908 7029 7101 6113 7203 7213 5709 5708 7112 7314 7217 7304 5705 7108 7205 6008 5911 7221 7318 7300 6009 7322 5426 7204 5700 7101 7124 7021 7120 7304 7209 5811 5917 7208 7401 60047108 7205 7400 7123 5924 5701 7216 5717 7209 7028 7105 59216001 7109 7017 7200 7223 7324 7116 7120 7213 7301 7044 7108 7200 7104 7121 7112 5704 7117 7100 7205 5416 7208 7000 7133 7016 7005 7117 5721 5704 7201 7401 7326 7113 5824 7105 7104 7004 5404 7113 7120 7104 7009 7217 5724 7116 7000 7316 7121 60056009 7112 7201 7105 5412 7101 7117 5713 7109 7116 7113 5804 7008 5728 7125 7045 7212 5414 7129 73005800 7204 7216 6840 7320 542460136021 6913602569086017 5736 54027300 7305 6029 58285720 5500-026001 7012 7004 7309 54187008 5504-0654205508-105422540070757234-7240 7227-7233 72 32- 7 22 05549 5501-5511 5545 5553-5561 55395551- 5565 5515-5527553555415531 70407300 7068-7096 70327044-706470365521-5527 5530-5536 5555-5547 5529-5537 5538-55485511-5519 7121-55 5916 PROJECT LIMITS W 70TH STANTRIM RDDUBLIN CIR DUBLIN RD KERRY RD WEXFORD RDANTRIM TERANTRIM CTDOWN RDL E E V A L L E Y R D SHANNON DRTRALEE DRSHANNON DRKEMRICH DR DEWEY HILL RD W 70TH ST ANTRIM RDLANHAM LN FLEETWOOD DRLANHAM LNTARA RDLEE WESTON CIR VILLAGE DR CAHILL RDVALLEY CIR/ Engineering DeptNovember 2025 Sewer Blockage and Watermain BreaksProspect Knolls ACD Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-458CITYOFEDINAMINNESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Legend Sewer Blockage Watermain Breaks Page 239 of 668 APPENDIX E Street Lights and Signs Page 240 of 668 Page 241 of 668 Page 242 of 668 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Page 243 of 668 Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy Page 244 of 668 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 245 of 668 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 246 of 668 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 247 of 668 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 248 of 668 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 249 of 668 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 250 of 668 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 251 of 668 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 252 of 668 APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Page 253 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room October 23, 2025 1. Call to Order Vice Chair Brown called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Bildsten, Brown, Olson, White Late: Commissioner Lassig Absent: Commissioners Lewis, Rosen, Trueger, Wright, Bracken Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni, 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the September 18, 2025 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. 5. Community Comment Taylor Bruhschwein, 5744 Ewing Ave, commented on the Wooddale Ave bike lane updates between 50th St and Valley View Rd noted in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and asked the Commission to review the proposed project. Bruhschwein noted that the project has a good chance to decrease motor vehicle trips on Wooddale Ave and connect to the proposed Twin Loops facility. The corridor is close to Pamela Park, Wooddale Park, Utley Park, four schools and commercial destinations. Bruhschwein noted that the current infrastructure does not feel safe and felt that demand is there to bike if improvements were to be made. Bruhschwein also asked the Commission to be bold when reviewing the proposed reconstruction projects tonight. Commissioner Lassig arrived at 6:08. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Prospect Knolls A/C/D Reconstruction Project Senior Project Engineer Ben Jore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • Suggest including the intersection of 70th St and Antrim Rd and to consider extending the westbound bike lane to the intersection. Page 254 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 • Consider extending the sidewalk one more block north on Shannon Dr to Lee Valley to collect more walkshed. • Concerned about resident opposition at the 11th hour like the Concord reconstruction project last year. • Suggest referencing the Quality of Life Survey results at the public hearing to show support for sidewalks. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented. Motion failed for lack of a second. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented and to recommend additional analysis of the 70th St and Antrim Rd intersection for a potential demonstration project. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.2. Parklawn Court Reconstruction Project Graduate Engineer Chris Moore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • Appreciate the critical thought put into the recommendations. This sidewalk connection is a small but important link. • Suggest that lack of response from adjacent properties owners/tenants might reflect support for the project. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Olson to endorse the proposed improvements for the Parklawn Court reconstruction project as presented. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.3. South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project Staff Liaison Scipioni presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • The proposed shared-use path would be great for providing access to the future France Avenue pedestrian crossing. • Suggest considering another midblock median further west along the corridor. • Suggest constructing the proposed Wooddale Ave bike boulevard through the South Cornelia neighborhood as part of this project. • The multi-year project will be disruptive to the residents, but it will provide a good opportunity for new multi-modal facilities. 6.4. Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 The Commission reviewed and commented on the staff report. Page 255 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 SEAT NAME 1 Wright, Grant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% 2 VACANT 3 Bildsten, Roger 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 5 Rosen, Adam 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 7 Olson, Bethany 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 8 White, Joan 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 9 VACANT 10 Lassig, Augie (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 11 Bracken, Logan (s) 1 1 50% Page 256 of 668 APPENDIX H Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials Page 257 of 668 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 1 K: i, cA-4-40) 101A-2.f eei-AA.... 70 2„6 I frz_RF_Jr 2 ,--(Er---F G /55 EL i3e-z--e--.. Zoo ? Z-4-A/ 44 ik,1 3 -)" OLP ; 11, Uje_Ary\----c 110QQt Down Psockct 4 -pk - -, (1 -P--,,5 <- F 1 (-_) .. ... r, (( 7,00 siiin h (,-, Dv- 5 70‘...4_,,,...,t.c.„s 5----,7 ''<i o!... Ts+, 6 -Lt.Sia V) -- ,(4n gs - C 3 ki\i - 7o TI- 7 e--) 4 V \, c&)1•)te -) jcV -- 1-1M1 S- .1 (A) 3T) 8 Th(1"4- 47-ky 467-0011 ‘ oo 5 6 06frA 6-e,1.e.) 9 X / Fi-e 44 4) fte-i" 6,5-0/ * 1/a 7 D 10 ) wt Sal bik4k5i,,14‘44/242_ 1-c32,c) Slukyn&AA-CDr. 11 Ga ry -. ate,/ Icy tc-Tc/ins5c,r- .SS D/ 11;//a6e, 4.)r, 12 A/ 4.7,-, ki g_e_4e-is 1,1 1$ 13 , 20-vQ.., LOMMe_____k II -Apn __,_-\--4Th-1--c;, 14 6( r.--\-- C-1-7 1 \-1--..ct 1°2 O u - )e,,s, Cltr do _ 15 gkk.b i_.%/0„1 LAI3is 7671h KL=-_-)e__, E0,6,- 16 0,(2-1A--) C-* )3T--c, r NAL-- ---/ (2..-:' c L-e-e-1-t,/- 6 %) D4--t 17 M -A-1-1 l_,S T.- 0 -7/c4 riee/A)ddd ipri:/z 18 <-3: k ..\ ( j.x. cf 6,- -110 .c 1-(s2eh,,,d..,t Pr,-e 19 -L. ,,,-, ' nfz_t_&-s-L. /-6,, ----7 k 09 r-, ffil-LaoD -Pal 0 e- 20 fiecipte (-L©P 721-2_ I—A p(A- 7z2V /i4All--1/7(-n:x4 (5-ei/i ijA4-70 ci, or 21 1)OiLl- UPt-d0 - ALPS ( -C:9 22 t1606 ter00 i'df 7 //kat Rrib`ve 23 AoolNeAl.,e_ i\ActiAao/ 55-26 YI'llat Dr i,i t_ 24 4t,d64;126G ° g/a4 57/7 // ':- , ii4.4fAR 25 PZ--k 04,..ess _ I Lo L 1 A g,J 26 44,a f -95 ao G,&,, 7100 Poies000l DY -7`2-61r F ( (d-i .3-.& Dr. 27 /' ,- , D,A 28 -If \ (A6v a-- -l-e1152-44. ' MA La h hcon tr) 29 b-A-4-‘`-- -2Y---4)--7--)-,-- 4 Zei--/ -k,,.. 7 o o 30 7e/ < e_ IA cy-,4_14 55- Li c w_ 7o t-4 5 .r Page 1 of 4 Page 258 of 668 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 31 i.e..' -1/1 t„,t,L5 .) 07 6-11 ir ' \v‘ (-1- 32 Pc,t,,1 d c•cru 0 %laid kekket L L 33 --Iv.S.W\ Syr re- LA 1 OCI'l La eti-vt," 34 re('',0f„rby --"x),( v .,..7^ 35 Veco n t ca, er 44(w.e.V _.-Si knol 701 St.., 36 k(-1--, .\ Sai \\ a--_SA '1113 (A r-rk_cz --\" 0 6-1 37 Cr e - 70.2-e- -aannvlA Oviv-t 38 A , ( )-(4,-"J,4 ' „s ti 4,,.. 0 ,.., a ?CM, K--r '''y' 1 " 4 39 ,A eP /ArP4'L4 70/,,,,-1,.. ze, 703z.. CO ElFtet, gi) 40 (-pool, 1- At.ks4\ 0\ ert_ Pi--ers'eA 41 /44,64EL getarz_ --71/ a 24(,H~ 2,t) 42 cc AiNI --B ---( 0 (- ...,Vi, IA e vv e• 43 Rit a &\ .1v1i 1 t5 '--7 (0 a 54ovitrAeK fi t 44 (fil -S i 1((t 3 -/D5 Kunrick owe 45 494f( .4 ,74/iii 4-- 4i/ 77 )7 a/ /<2.i,,' c4 At., 46 , .b3 kik_ 1.,,,-y\iz- -lifol c-lA0.-mAN-0( -1>‘ - 47 (1 crS Q S0_,\---,c),e, ? \ cj 1 0 t \ LemVoi,\IQkf,jn 70 54— 4a.....2-Ace.._,A, 48 T-L,,_ ... -q_ yr / . 5 cP•14- 49 s--e„fr ,,t _,--,.-- ;co-., 76 ›--s- 50 CIL -e '49 ,e,.-L --C:;. 164,e_ 714 1:---4-e2t.....-J r)-- 51 COLYY1 .e Bmi&Acti 12‘co. -\.t.e'rvv'ood 1)1' 52 CASV100. ‘Q 0"\-€ C MCA_ le\ 0 12:2-I V\-Cew000l ,r 53 N\Q---k4 °L.- 1 C) ONacv‘z(-\ 4-.1". -t-es--0-ZO, 54 c_115.-7-f A, E- 1.4 _To1-1— Cloy ci.5____ 1/A-1-6Eie *1) 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 2 of 4 Page 259 of 668 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting –August 26, 2025 Page 260 of 668 Agenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •Project Scopes •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Questions Page 261 of 668 Engineering - Design & Construction Division Brandon Freeman Sr. Engineering Technician Chris Moore Graduate Engineer Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer Chad Millner Director of Engineering Jon Moore Sr. Engineering Technician Tom Haataja Sr. Engineering Technician Ben Jore Sr. Project Engineer Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator Page 262 of 668 2026 Project Areas •Parklawn Court •4 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •283 Properties Page 263 of 668 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility issues Page 264 of 668 Why Reconstruct? •Roadway originally constructed with in the 1950’s-1980’s •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) Page 265 of 668 Existing Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Some streets have curb and gutter while others do not •Some properties already have concrete driveway aprons, some do not Page 266 of 668 Existing Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains •Sanitary Sewer - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. - Inflow and infiltration •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing Page 267 of 668 What / Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically, 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey Page 268 of 668 Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences Page 269 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Roadways •Replacement and installation of curb & gutter •Subgrade corrections as needed •New roadbed and asphalt pavement surface Page 270 of 668 Living Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •Minimum roadway design elements •Street Width •Impacts •Cost •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Page 271 of 668 Proposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced / installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy Page 272 of 668 Proposed Improvements - Utilities •Includes partial replacement of watermain •New service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •May include localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Lining of sanitary sewer •Storm sewer upgrades Page 273 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Installed when feasible and warranted •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website Page 274 of 668 Utility Ownership City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service Page 275 of 668 Utility Ownership •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Page 276 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Ped / Bike •Based on Pedestrian and Bicyclist Master Plan •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts Page 277 of 668 Private Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Fiber optic internet currently being installed •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance Page 278 of 668 Overhead Utility Poles •Resident request about burying overhead utilities •Not required by the City, nor does the City fund this •If pursued, full cost by property owners •Significant cost •Private service connection not included Page 279 of 668 What You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Localized flooding during rainfall •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain Page 280 of 668 What You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in ROW •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Construction equipment stored on streets •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) Page 281 of 668 What You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 7 days to allow driveways to cure Page 282 of 668 What You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be restored with new sod Page 283 of 668 What You Can Expect •We will; •Provide opportunities for input •Keep you informed •Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs Page 284 of 668 City Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •Sanitary sewer •Watermain Page 285 of 668 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •Sidewalks /shared-use paths •Bike lanes •Associated signage and pavement markings •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees Page 286 of 668 Do Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~23% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •~3.2% go to Public Works •Snowplowing •Pothole repairs •Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •In 2022 taxes began paying for a portion of street reconstruction Figures per proposed 2025 Edina Tax Levy (not final) Page 287 of 668 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers portion of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Driveway installation •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings Page 288 of 668 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties REU FactorLand Use ClassScenario 1.0Single-Family ResidentialA 0.5Multi-Family Residential –Apartment/CondosB Page 289 of 668 Project Details – Parklawn Court •4 properties (41.50 REUs) •330’ of road •Full removal and replacement of curb & gutter •Concrete roadway removed and replaced with Bituminous •Water services replacement •Sanitary Lining and local replacement •Storm sewer improvements •Potential sidewalk(s) •Street width still to be determined Page 290 of 668 Project Details – Prospect Knolls A, C, & D •283 properties (231.67 REUs) •3.20 miles of road •Installation and replacement of curb & gutter •Partial watermain and full water services replacement •Sanitary lining and localized repairs •Storm sewer improvements •24’ street width 5’ walk: •Portions of Shannon Drive, Lanham Lane •Kemrich Drive, Fleetwood Drive •Typically 27’ street width remaining streets Page 291 of 668 Proposed Utility Improvements •Install 12” watermain from West 70th Street to Gleason Road •Existing Utility Easement •Replace 6” watermain on Dublin Circle •Replace 6” watermain on Lanham Lane •Upgrade 1.5” watermain in cul-de-sacs to 6” watermain •Install 8” sanitary sewer on 70th Street Page 292 of 668 Pedestrian Facilities Plan •5’ concrete sidewalk •Shannon Drive •Kemrich Drive •Fleetwood Drive •Lanham Lane •Connection to existing Lewis Park path •Sidewalk to be maintained by adjacent property owners Page 293 of 668 Proposed: 24’ road width, one-sided parking, 5’ sidewalk (0-5’ grass boulevard) Existing: 30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – Sidewalk Streets Page 294 of 668 Existing: 26’-30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed: 27’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – No Sidewalk Streets •27’ road width •Reduce street widths by 0-3’ •Two-sided parking to remain •Exceptions •Kerry Road •24’ width •One-sided parking •Village Drive •30’ width Page 295 of 668 Revised Roadway Cost Assessment - Local Sample Assessment During Transition $30,000$20,000$10,000% of Local Roadway Costs Assessed Construction Year $30,000$20,000$10,000100%2020 $23,670- $17,358 $15,780- $11,572 $7,890- $5,78678.90%-57.86%2021-2025 $15,780$10,520$5,26052.60%2026 $14,202-$1,578$9,468-$1,052$4,734-$52647.34%-5.26%2027-2035 $0$0$00%2036 Page 296 of 668 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 297 of 668 Assessments Districts – Prospect Knolls •Disparity in potential benefit •3 Separate Districts Page 298 of 668 Preliminary Assessments – Prospect Knolls & Parklawn Ct *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) SY of Paving per REU Square Yards of Paving # of REUs Estimated Assessment Range per REU* % of Roadway Costs Assessed NeighborhoodYear -------Prospect Knolls A/C/D2026 328.119,25058.67$21,500 -$16,200 52.60%District 1 2026 161.424,692153$10,900 -$8,200 52.60%District 22026 66.01,32120$3,800 -$2,900 52.60%District 32026 29.41,22141.5$2,400-$1,80057.86%Parklawn Court2026 120.935,250291.6$11,500 -$7,500 57.86%Presidents A/B2025 175.230,568174.49$17,100 -$11,900 63.12%Concord B/C 2024 Page 299 of 668 Typical Project Timeline MilestoneDate Engineering studies/estimates providedJuly –September 2025 Public hearingsDecember 2025 Plan preparation and biddingJanuary – March 2026 Construction beginsApril – May 2026 Construction concludesOctober – November 2026 Warranty work2027 Final assessment hearingFall 2027 Page 300 of 668 Assessment Timing MilestoneDate Initial Public HearingsDecember 2025 Project ConstructedSummer 2026 Final Assessment HearingOctober 2027 Assessment Filed with CountyNovember 2027 Assessment on Tax StatementJanuary 2028 Page 301 of 668 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2024 interest rate was 4.69% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 302 of 668 Communication •Regular Mail •All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires •Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers •Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, concrete, temporary inaccessibility) •Better Together Edina – City Website Project Page Page 303 of 668 Better Together Edina •Best way to stay informed •www.bettertogether edina.org •Free, access to periodic updates on project progress and schedules Page 304 of 668 Providing Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •Traffic/pedestrian issues •Street drainage issues •Streetlight upgrades •Public hearing in December 2025 •Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns Page 305 of 668 Questionnaire Results Responses Received to DateNeighborhood 26% (74 / 283)Prospect Knolls 25% (1 / 4)Parklawn Court Page 306 of 668 How To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Review Better Together Edina updates •Ask questions, stay informed Page 307 of 668 Contact Us Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 ADitzler@edinamn.gov Page 308 of 668 Questions? •Ask questions on Better Together Edina Q&A page •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/parklawn-court •Call or email Page 309 of 668 Thank you for your time! Page 310 of 668 APPENDIX I Resident Questionnaires Page 311 of 668 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT 01 April 2025 - 16 November 2025 PROJECT NAME: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Page 312 of 668 SURVEY QUESTIONS Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 1 of 52 Page 313 of 668 Q1 Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, b... 12 (14.8%) 12 (14.8%) 69 (85.2%) 69 (85.2%) Yes No Question options Mandatory Question (81 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 2 of 52 Page 314 of 668 Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Standing water in backyard during rainy years. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM Cul de sac additional storm drains and backyard storm and sewer drains with fairly steep grade. Special drainage is in place and seems to work OK. Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM front lawn collects water Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Standing water in the street in front of the mailbox due to the road sinking below the gutter. JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM The NW corner of Cahill Road and Village Drive always has standing water in the summer and ice in the winter making it impossible to access the sidewalk. Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Originally we had standing water in driveway and lawn. Through the City we were able to connect drain tile to the concrete storm sewer basin buried in the front yard (near street). Problem was solved. MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM Prior owners reported back yard had a partial mudslide following a heavy rainfall. Currently problem has been addressed. jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM Backyard- bottom of backyard has standing water when we get a lot of rain. PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM Grading. Water runs down the hill and the street drainage sometimes is insufficient. Askeyj 10/16/2025 10:03 AM The area where Village Drive meets Cahill often has standing water. In particular, during the winter with snow melt and refreeze, this becomes a large ice patch. DonRep Driveway slopes down from street to house. Duirinng heavy rain, Q2 Please comment on the location and types of problems you have. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 3 of 52 Page 315 of 668 10/31/2025 09:08 AM driveway wazter drains west down front lawn, and then south around the house to the backyard, where it drains southeast through the backyard. Has caused lower level flooding in the past. So keeping street water from pouring down the driveway is very importannt. Optional question (11 response(s), 70 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 4 of 52 Page 316 of 668 Q3 How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? 54 (66.7%) 54 (66.7%) 20 (24.7%) 20 (24.7%) 7 (8.6%) 7 (8.6%) Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned Question options Optional question (81 response(s), 0 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 5 of 52 Page 317 of 668 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM People drive very fast on Kemrich Drive and fleetwood. Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM trucks going fast Salaar 6/28/2025 03:11 PM W 70th St, people going too fast John Uecker 6/28/2025 03:43 PM NO sidewalks, we do not need them. Street is wide and has great walkability. Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Between Shannon and Fleetwood many drivers rapidly accelerate well beyond the speed limit. Many pedestrians, including young children are ofter present. Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Cars go very fast down Fleetwood and around the corners on Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Antrim. A pedestrian or bike lane would be helpful on Lee/Down/Kerry/Antrim to protect pedestrians. cristina notermann 6/29/2025 11:55 AM down fleetwood Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM Fleetwood is a popular connecting street between 70th and Dewey - we have a lot of thru traffic that drives excessive speeds. Neighbor traffic tends to be good speed as we all understand. Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Antrim Court sometimes has people speeding quite a bit. Also Antrim road, Kerry Road, Wexford Road, Down Road and Lee Valley road have quite a bit of speeding. It can be a little dangerous on these roads because there are not sidewalks and the turn from Wexford to Down road is sharp, blind and the trees grow way into the road. Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM 70th street and Tracy. People often speed and don't stop at the stop sign. Q4 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 6 of 52 Page 318 of 668 michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM northbound on fleetwood towards Lanham and westbound up Lanham beginning east of Fleetwood to w70th. People drive way to fast especially considering the amount of people who walk, kids playing, etc. Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Antrim RD, narrow and fast. Antrim Rd should not have street parking. Brutlag 6/29/2025 04:05 PM All of Fleetwood Drive - seems like a cut through. Not a lot of cars but travel fast Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM I live at 7201 Lanham Lane. We have 3 active children ages 13, 11, and 8 that use the front yard for soccer, lacrosse and running around. They also use the driveway and street for scooters and bikes. There generally aren't too may cars, but there are plenty of them that drive down the street well over 30 mph. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Traffic along 70th between Antrum and Tracy routinely runs above the speed limit, especially teenagers when the high school lets out. GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM We are on a cul-de-sac and only rarely get delivery vehicles that are traveling too quickly. desa0080 6/30/2025 04:32 PM I live on the middle of Fleetwood Dr and cars go very fast trying to connect between 70th and Dewey Hill Rd JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM Cahill Road and 70th Street are both posted at 25 mph which is nonsense. Should be minimum 30 mph or 40 like other equivalent streets like Gleason and Vernon. No vehicles, including City of Edina cars and trucks, go 25. Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Traffic using Fleetwood as a through street travels faster than the speed limit. The curve and elevation change between 7212 and 7216 creates a blind spot for traffic headed south. We’ve seen drivers have close calls with kids playing in driveways who have run out after balls into the street. We do not want to see the street narrowed as a solution. MTK Occasional fast cars. Not a significant issue, but kids play in front Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 7 of 52 Page 319 of 668 7/06/2025 05:17 PM yards/driveways. Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Our street has a serious curve on a hill with a slight blind spot. Speed is an issue. SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM Speed limit near 70th and Cahill is 25mph. I don't want speeding but this seems extremely slow. Could city consider raising it to 30 or 35? PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM The speed limit on Cahill is too low (especially for a hill). Chazbo711 7/21/2025 10:48 AM Cahill Rd between 70th and 78th. Most drivers respect the speed limit of 25 mph but some cars seem to go 40 mph. Please continue occasional radar/ticketing. Also, after school some (probably Edina HS students) speed down the hill on 70th heading east to the Cahill Rd intersection. francis.glover 7/23/2025 08:16 AM Fleetwood drive hill can sometimes be used as a cut through and some cars going down and up the hill can go faster than desired. Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM The curve on Fleetwood Drive doesn't have great visibility, and my kids ride their bikes on the street often. Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Coming up or down the hill on Antrim Road Frequently vehicles are parked and cause blind spots. Too many fast drivers are going to cause ahead on collision Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Speed bumps would resolve speeding Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM Corner of Lanham lane and Fleetwood Drive, cars use Fleetwood to cut across to Braemar and tend to speed down DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM 1. Our street: Our section of Shannon Dr is dead ended, which helps limit the traffic to primarily local residents and comercial workers. So no concern regarding the street in front of our house. 2 Neighborhood. Traffic on Dewey Hill Rd is increasing, and cars rolling through the stop signs at Dewey Hill and Shannon Dr is significantly increasing. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 8 of 52 Page 320 of 668 Optional question (30 response(s), 51 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 9 of 52 Page 321 of 668 Q5 How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? 70 (87.5%) 70 (87.5%) 8 (10.0%) 8 (10.0%)2 (2.5%) 2 (2.5%) Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned Question options Optional question (80 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 10 of 52 Page 322 of 668 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM I live on Village Drive. Traffic along Cahill has increased significantly since I moved in 8 years ago. Making it difficult to exit neighborhood. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM Sometimes there are a LOT of trucks in the neighborhood michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Antrim Rd should not have street parking. Brutlag 6/29/2025 04:05 PM Speed not volume Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM When Hwy. 62 backs up, 70th becomes a major thoroughfare of traffic from the freeway. Also heavy traffic when the high school lets out in the afternoons during the school year. desa0080 6/30/2025 04:32 PM 7208 Fleetwood Dr and same comment as above. Our street is full of kids and is a through street between 70th and Dewey Hill Rd Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM There is plenty of room on our street. Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM Delivery trucks drive tooooooo fast…..FedEx. Prime…..UPS…..all delivery trucks….too & from SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM More traffic on Cahill now with apartments and expecting more when apartments on 78th are completed (I realize that is technically Bloomington.) Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM On Antrim road Vehicles park on both sides of the road Q6 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 11 of 52 Page 323 of 668 Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Not a thru street Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM Frequent construction projects on Fleetwood drive lead to narrowing of street due to increased parked cars DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM See #4 Optional question (14 response(s), 67 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 12 of 52 Page 324 of 668 Q7 How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Excludes speed and traffic volumes. Examples of poor motorist behavior include rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively) 20 (24.7%) 20 (24.7%) 57 (70.4%) 57 (70.4%) 4 (4.9%) 4 (4.9%) Concerned Not Concerned Very Concerned Question options Optional question (81 response(s), 0 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 13 of 52 Page 325 of 668 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM Rolling through stop signs at 70th and Cahill. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM People drive very fast - well above speed limit on kemrich and fleetwood Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM I am close to 70th street they tend to speed up and there is a curve in the street which can be a issue Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Very concerned. My vehicle was totaled last year at the intersection of Dewey. Hill and Shannon. Westbound driver blew through the stop sign and broadsided me. He said he didn't know there was a stop sign. Many do rolling stops and assume they have right of way on Dewey, even though drivers on Shannon stopped. Also, at Cahill and Dewey a traffic circle should replace the goofy intersection currently there. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM (We live in a townhome community that's not a through street, so the only issues we've had were with previous residents who drove recklessly) Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Cars are not on their proper side of the street around the corners of Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Antrim. Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Again on that main road Antrim Road, Dublin road, Kerry Road Down road people drive aggressive and fast. I don't understand why they drive that way because they all live in the neighborhood. tiamat2pi 6/29/2025 01:49 PM 70th and Antrim - sometimes drivers coming on Antrim from the north don't realize cars coming from the left (up 70th) may not be turning right and don't yield. Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM People often don't stop at the stop sign. Q8 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 14 of 52 Page 326 of 668 michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM There are plenty of drivers, teens and adults, that drive too fast and do not pay attention to pedestrians. With no sidewalks, the only option for walking is in the road. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Motorists constantly coasting through the stop sign at 70th and Tracy Ave. Johnmlohmann 6/30/2025 06:41 AM Both rolling stops and ignoring healers signs are a problem Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM Large number of drivers treat stop signs, such as the ones at Shannon Drive/Dewey Hill Road, as yield signs, barely slowing down, and only actually stopping if another car is approaching at the same time. G 6/30/2025 09:39 PM It is a windy street and when it comes to a curve you are often head to head with another car. JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM Many cars have no mufflers or mufflers that enhance the noise. There should be a noise ordinance that limits noise. Vehicles with load mufflers should be stopped. druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM Just UPS and FedEx drivers driving a bit too fast. Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Motorists ignore the stop sign at Shannon and Kemrich for southbound traffic. jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM At Dewey Hill and Shannon, people sometimes do not stop at the stop sign. And at Kemrich and Shannon, people do not yield. Also- turning the corner at the top of Lanham Drive is dangerous. And the bushes at Lanham and 70th need to be cut down or trimmed as turning traffic often doesn’t see a car there when turning. PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM People basically ignore the stop signs along Dewey Hill. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 15 of 52 Page 327 of 668 Chazbo711 7/21/2025 10:48 AM There is a formal posted crosswalk across 70th from Hillside/Limerick Lanes. Cars rarely stop for pedestrians waiting to cross. Luckily, there are usually enough gaps in traffic to cross safely but we would never venture out into the street there unless the coast was clear (or we run across if there is a car in the distance). Most drivers seem to think they have the right of way there. I don’t know why. Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Antrim road up and down the hill DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM See #4 Optional question (23 response(s), 58 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 16 of 52 Page 328 of 668 Q9 In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: 19 (34.5%) 19 (34.5%) 3 (5.5%) 3 (5.5%) 33 (60.0%) 33 (60.0%) Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, or running Question options Optional question (55 response(s), 26 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 17 of 52 Page 329 of 668 Q10 Do you feel any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? 39 (49.4%) 39 (49.4%) 40 (50.6%) 40 (50.6%) Yes No Question options Optional question (79 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 18 of 52 Page 330 of 668 Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM 70th and Cahill. I feel safe as a driver but not as a pedestrian. Cars do not give walkers the right of way. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM kemrich and Shannon Drive Fleetwood and Latham Lane Kemrich Drive and Fleetwood drive Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM City hall thomaspmagne 6/28/2025 04:51 PM Shannon Dr. and Dewey Hill Rd. Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM Dewey and Shannon and Dewey and Cahill cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM The bike lane on 7oth Street disappears as the street passes under Highway 100—feels dangerous for bicyclists. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM Kerry to Down is a loop that people pay little attention to the Wexford offshoot since it is lightly used, but heavy vegetation can impede driver's view when turning left. mas54po 6/29/2025 07:13 AM Antrum/70th; Make a 4 way stop Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Shannon and Lee Valley & Shannon and Kemrich Paul Cashin 6/29/2025 11:47 AM Hwy 62 and Tracy. (multiple issues) 1. Exiting from eastbound 62, the sightlines are poor, and increased traffic due to cut-through traffic during heavy traffic on 62 adds to problems. 2. Exiting from westbound 62, there is too much traffic, and it is a relatively complex intersection. Needs a stoplight. 3. Driving south on Tracy, the lanes are not aligned as you pass the 62 entrance/exit (westbound) forcing drivers to make a quick jog to the right to avoid the northbound traffic turning left onto 62 west. Compounded by cars nudging out from exit ramp onto Tracy given the heavy volume. 4. Similar issue when driving northbound and trying to turn left onto 62 west. Need to pay attention to make sure oncoming traffic notices that jog. 5. Tracy Ave Q11 Which intersection do you feel is unsafe? Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 19 of 52 Page 331 of 668 bridge over 62 is NOT pedestrian or bicycle friendly. cristina notermann 6/29/2025 11:55 AM lee vallye and down road and down road and wexford road Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Wexford, Down and Kerry is not very say. There should be sidewalks on that whole road from 70th to Dewey Hill. Also 70th and Antrim should have a signal. The idea that 70th has right of way and everyone else stops is not obvious and it leads to issues with safety. Valleyview and Antrim should have a signal. Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM 70th and Tracy ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM Lee Valley Road and Shannon Drive. With the stop sign only at one of the three directions, it's really confusing about who has the right of way. Same for the intersection at Kemrich and Shannon (confusion over right of way) Where Shannon Drive meets Lee Valley (coming from the northern most section of Shannon Drive), there is a large flower garden that blocks visibility around the corner. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM Kemrich/Shannon intersection. The southbound traffic on shannon has a stop sign, which is frequently ignored. The other two directions of traffic have no signage. Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM The 70th street and Antrim - terrible - people don’t Know 70th has right of way up to our neighborhood Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM 70th and Tracy. Why the stop sign? Trim trees to see the stop sign. 3 way stop at 70th and antrim - likely should be 4 way. people don't know 1 side does not have a stopsign. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM 70th and Tracy Johnmlohmann 6/30/2025 06:41 AM There are very many blind corners in the prospect hills neighborhood Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM The 3-way intersection at Shannon Drive and Kemrich Drive has only one stop sign, on Shannon south-bound. I have seen several narrow- Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 20 of 52 Page 332 of 668 miss accidents between vehicles north-bound on Shannon and west- bound on Kemrich, neither of whom has a stop sign. Also see above re Shannon/Dewey Hill. Cars sometimes run straight through the stops on Dewey Hill. GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM Shannon Drive at Dewey Hill. Stops signs along Dewey Hill are occasionally ignored by motorists. maggiedevoe 7/01/2025 05:26 AM My only concern is the intersection of 70th St & Antrim which is currently a 3-way stop (no stop for westbound 70th st drivers) and many motorists driving south on Antrim and making a left onto Eastbound 70th don't realize its only a 3-way stop so they don't yield to oncoming westbound 70th St vehicles ElectronLady 7/03/2025 10:10 AM The bend (Hairpin) on Down Road. Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Kemrich and Shannon. jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM 1) Shannon and Kemrich. 2) Lanham and 70th Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM Getting off on Tracy from either way on 62 Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM Stop sign@ Shanon & Lee Valley road or Down road Mwild 7/13/2025 05:47 PM 70th and Antrim Rd dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM Dewey Hill and Shannon drive 4 way stop Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM 70th Street & Antrim caution used for drivers not stopping - rolling through - off line Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM The site lines could be improved when traveling by car south on Lee Valley Road where it intersects with Northbound Shannon Drive due to vegetation Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 21 of 52 Page 333 of 668 SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM 70th and Cahill. It was re-done recently and turning from Cahill to 70th going East is EXTREMELY tight. Often cars have to move over or wait until there are no cars to make the right turn. Poor design. PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM There is a weird triangle boulevard where Cahill and Dewey Hill meet that creates really awkward turns. EdinaChris 8/06/2025 11:03 AM Curve at the top of lanham between fleetwood and 70th. Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM Dewey Hill & Shannon Drive rdizzo 8/11/2025 12:10 PM I feel all the intersections on Shannon Dr north of Dewey are unsafe at times because people don't seem to know who has the right of way all Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Antrim road and 70 th at the 3 way stop sign jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM Shannon at Kemrich Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Valley view and Antrim rd - rolling stops/non-stop, failing to yield, too fast, etc. Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM Lanham lane and Fleetwood drive MeganL 10/07/2025 06:10 PM 70th & Antrim needs a crosswalk for kids going to VVMS & EHS. Askeyj 10/16/2025 10:03 AM Cahill and Village Drive DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM As mentioned in #4, Dewey Hill Rd and Shannon Dr is becoming more of a problem. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 22 of 52 Page 334 of 668 Optional question (43 response(s), 38 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 23 of 52 Page 335 of 668 Q12 Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign)Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Insufficient lighting Other (please specify)Street(s) too wide Question options 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 14 21 24 13 14 1 10 Optional question (49 response(s), 32 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 24 of 52 Page 336 of 668 Q13 In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: 30 (65.2%) 30 (65.2%) 2 (4.3%) 2 (4.3%) 14 (30.4%) 14 (30.4%) Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, or running Question options Optional question (46 response(s), 35 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 25 of 52 Page 337 of 668 Q14 How frequently do you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood? 43 (54.4%) 43 (54.4%) 18 (22.8%) 18 (22.8%) 10 (12.7%) 10 (12.7%) 4 (5.1%) 4 (5.1%)4 (5.1%) 4 (5.1%) Very frequently (daily or near daily)Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Never Question options Optional question (79 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 26 of 52 Page 338 of 668 Q15 If you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop)Access transit Other (please specify) Commute to/from work Question options 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 71 7 1 9 Optional question (72 response(s), 9 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 27 of 52 Page 339 of 668 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM Slower traffic and better intersections (safer for kids if motorists stop at intersections) Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM nothing John Uecker 6/28/2025 03:43 PM NO sidewalks needed. Let’s keep the assessment price down. Neighborhood is great for walking and jogging and biking as is. Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM Less government cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM NA peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM none Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Marked pedestrian or bike lanes, better lighting tiamat2pi 6/29/2025 01:49 PM more sidewalks ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM The stretch of Shannon between Kemrich and Lee Valley is really unsafe for walking. A sidewalk or a bike/walk lane would be very helpful. Same for the stretch of Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Antrim. Those routes are used by kids walking to bus stops or Valley View and EHS. And with the curves, visibility is hard making it feel unsafe. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM None - if we want to walk we walk - it’s the hills that are hard to come up Q16 If you don't walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 28 of 52 Page 340 of 668 Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM more sidewalks Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM More sidewalk access or a dedicated area of the road for pedestrians would be appreciated. We love living in Edina, but we miss sidewalk access that we had when we lived in Minneapolis. Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM None. There are lots of walkers in my neighborhood; I'm just not usually one of them. There is no impediment. Traffic on most streets, except Dewey Hill, is light and usually moves fairly slowly, given the winding streets and hilly terrain. CharlieBray1 6/30/2025 03:22 PM Having sidewalks will NOT increase the number of people walking in this neighborhood. EITAN MEDINI 7/02/2025 08:28 AM none Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Nothing sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM we do not want sidewalks. they would ruin the neighborhood. stay out of our neighborhood, it is doing fine the way it is. NO to sidewalks! Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM We need a sign indicating children at play. We need a complete asphalt re-do of our street. No resurfacing and we no need sidewalks. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM None needed. Leave as is. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM None Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Side walks A caution sign on hill jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM fewer potholes and huge cracks Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 29 of 52 Page 341 of 668 Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Roads in prospect hills could use resurfacing, that is all Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM No reconstruction needed except for replacing yield sign with stop sign and considering speed bumps on Fleetwood drive Optional question (25 response(s), 56 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 30 of 52 Page 342 of 668 Q17 How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? 12 (15.4%) 12 (15.4%) 11 (14.1%) 11 (14.1%) 20 (25.6%) 20 (25.6%) 15 (19.2%) 15 (19.2%) 20 (25.6%) 20 (25.6%) Very frequently (daily or near daily)Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Never Question options Optional question (78 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 31 of 52 Page 343 of 668 Q18 If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop)Commute to/from work Other (please specify)Access transit Question options 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 49 16 2 2 Optional question (53 response(s), 28 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 32 of 52 Page 344 of 668 Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM Less government. Take out all bike lanes. Move bikes lanes off busy streets. Roads were built for cars. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM NA peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM none Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM Bike or pedestrian lanes ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM Same answer as above. The windy roads in our neighborhood are tough for visibility and it can feel unsafe to bike. Our kids would like to bike to school (EHS) but without a bike lane, it feels unsafe. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM None - we are very close to a bike path if we want to bike Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM remove the hills on valleuview and 70th ;) Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM I'm generally quite happy with the bicycle lanes around Edina. I bike regularly around Edina on my road bike and feel comfortable with the bicycle lanes. I also bike to and from the Braemar mountain bike trails with my children and the access is pretty good. maggiedevoe 7/01/2025 05:26 AM Existing bike lanes and traffic patterns support bicyclists today. EITAN MEDINI 7/02/2025 08:28 AM none Q19 If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 33 of 52 Page 345 of 668 Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Nothing is needed to enhance the ability to bike druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM None. The neighborhood is reasonably accommodating to cycling. Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM No res construction needed in our neighborhood. Plenty of room on our roads. We walk with group of 5 daily. sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM sidewalks would ruin the neighborhood. Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM I don’t want a bike path in neighborhood Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Our street is a hill, we live at the top of a hill. Can't reconstruct that and we 100% oppose sidewalks. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM Leave as is. No sidewalks either. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM None PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM Bike lanes would be great. Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM Not interested Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM My kids bike on Fleetwood Drive often, and I worry about northbound cars (coming up the hill and around the curve) having bad sightlines to see them. Patrick Horan 9/27/2025 03:21 PM None Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM Stop signs instead of yield signs Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 34 of 52 Page 346 of 668 DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM My wife and I are seniors and no longer use bicycles. Optional question (25 response(s), 56 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 35 of 52 Page 347 of 668 Q20 How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? 7 (8.8%) 7 (8.8%) 14 (17.5%) 14 (17.5%) 25 (31.3%) 25 (31.3%) 34 (42.5%) 34 (42.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Rarely (less than once per month)Never Very frequently (daily or near daily) Question options Optional question (80 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 36 of 52 Page 348 of 668 Q21 How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? 2 (2.5%) 2 (2.5%) 15 (18.8%) 15 (18.8%) 17 (21.3%) 17 (21.3%) 32 (40.0%) 32 (40.0%) 14 (17.5%) 14 (17.5%) Very frequently (daily or near daily)Frequently (2-3 times per week)Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Never Question options Optional question (80 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 37 of 52 Page 349 of 668 Q22 How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? 40 (50.6%) 40 (50.6%) 23 (29.1%) 23 (29.1%) 13 (16.5%) 13 (16.5%) 2 (2.5%) 2 (2.5%)1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Question options Optional question (79 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 38 of 52 Page 350 of 668 Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM Would like to continue to have availability of on street parking as needed Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM would like to have it on both sides cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM It rarely happens, but for several days this week, while a neighboring apartment complex was repaving its roadway, residents parked their cars in the bike line on Cahill Road. It felt unsafe for bikers. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM none Melissa Cohen 6/28/2025 08:12 PM If cars park on both sides of the road, it can be difficult to fit a vehicle in between. Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM Worried that sidewalks will reduce the width of our street and not allow for easy street parking. We have a steep driveway so our guests really can only park on street. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM n/a Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Antrim Rd should not have street parking by 70th. Gets very crowded, and the living facility staff park on the street, making it very narrow. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM On Lee Valley Circle, when people park on both sides of the street it becomes a one lane road. I'd like to see no parking signs on one side of the street to keep it open for two way traffic. Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM Plenty of on street parking druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM Neighbors visitors often park in front of mailbox. Q23 Any additional comments about parking? Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 39 of 52 Page 351 of 668 Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM Please don’t narrow the street. When there are cars parking in the street, they tend to be associated with large gatherings at neighboring houses. If the street goes down to the widths indicated on Better Together, we are concerned about a lack of space for traffic heading in both directions. MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM No sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM no to sidewalks. they would ruin the neighborhood. Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Our street is wide, parking is excellent. Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM I drive down our street very slow…people often come up shannon turn on the side of street …to cut corner…I away stop to be sure a car in not coming north on Shannon…on my side of street dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM I appreciate the ability to park on either side of the street Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM Keep them off the street as you are doing (restrictions) SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM N/A regarding parking. I live in a townhouse association not right on the street. Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM Everything is ok jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM no Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Parking becomes issue as not enough for social gatherings Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM When there are cars parked, Lanham and Fleetwood become very narrow and there are some blind spots Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 40 of 52 Page 352 of 668 MeganL 10/07/2025 06:10 PM If a construction crew or landscaper is working at a house - only one can can pass. I worry by adding a sidewalk & narrowing the street - passing by trucks & trailers will be even more challenging. Askeyj 10/16/2025 10:03 AM On street parking can be busy / tight when various neighborhood projects are done by any of the surrounding condos / townhomes. Projects can include street work, landscaping work, and normal landscaping maintenance - eg lawn mowers. Anything that brings in equipment or that blocks access to residents such that they need to park on the street. Otherwise, its great. DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM Relatively few cars park on the street on our two-block section of Shannon Dr. This is primarily because most homes have multi-car carages and wide driveways. Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM Village Drive looks like and drives like a lunar landing. It has patch on top of patch. Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM we want the neighborhood to be a safe place for kids to play, pedestrians, and bikers Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM street is in poor condition. I dont think we need sidewalks Salaar 6/28/2025 03:11 PM When they came to do construction, they tore up the entire ground and left and didn't fix it Alan Weiner 6/28/2025 03:46 PM The area is a mishmash of curvy and hilly roads. I have lived at my current address for 18 years and outside of the absolute poor quality of the roads, we have no issues with speeding or wreck less driving. If you are not from our neighborhood, you will drive really slow because of the twisty hilly roads and the potholes and road breaking apart. We do not need any sidewalks or wider roads, we just need new grading, paving, curbs and proper drainage at the low points of Optional question (26 response(s), 55 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Q24 Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 41 of 52 Page 353 of 668 the road. Sidewalks will ruin the quaintness of the entire Park Knolls Neiborhood. I love all of the green space we have and like I have said already, the twisty and hilly roads are not conducive to speeding or wreck less driving. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM Appreciate the city patching up the potholes on Village Drive this week. peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM Asphalt sorely needs to be replaced. The snow plows annually tear up any repairs due to the necessary maneuvering in the cul de sac to remove snow. Road seems to be getting narrower due to overgrowth from the sides. It's very limited traveled road, so not a big deal. Our driveway apron is crumbling asphalt, so would like further information on how much concrete apron we can expect and how much we might need to prepare prior to reconstruction. Melissa Cohen 6/28/2025 08:12 PM Before a sidewalk plan is finalized, I expect that homeowners whose properties are affected by this will be contacted and have an opportunity for input. With our house on the corner of Fleetwood Drive and Lanham Lane, we are concerned about the long length of sidewalk that may be installed on our property and the long term impact of that (upkeep, snow removal, liability, etc.) mas54po 6/29/2025 07:13 AM End of street--asphault in severe disrepair. Snow pushed into our property and tears up grass/landscaping. We are having extensive landscaping done and would like to not have snow pushed into our yard Paul Cashin 6/29/2025 11:47 AM Concrete roadways are brutal on our cars' suspensions. Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM Given Fleetwood is a thru street, there is considerably more traffic than one might think which causes the street to get tight/dangerous during busy times. Delivery trucks/workers/contractors parking on side while busy thru traffic is coming makes it wide enough for only one car right now Please consider other utility projects - such as US Internet, Centerpoint, Xcel, etc. - to minimize the yard impacts. Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM Street conditions are kind of bad in the area between 70th and Dewey Hill road. I feel like Hilary Lane should have been reengineered when it was resurfaced. I don't understand how the standing water on the sidewalk and road hasn't been fixed. There are a lot of kids who walk Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 42 of 52 Page 354 of 668 down Antrim Road, Dublin and Kerry. When I moved in the neighbors said they shouldn't walk on the road because it is dangerous and he was right. The road is narrow and there is a lot of trees which makes it more dangerous. michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM We'd prefer a marginally wider street with a bike/walking lane as opposed to a sidewalk. Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM We live on a quiet circle - it is perfect the way it is Somehow the city thinks everyone wants the urban smashed together setting . Peaceful is nice . If you’d like to know what would be nice is overhaul Cahill - it looks like a slum - rental U hauls - the buildings are tired . We deserve better - please help Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM Guests park on Antrim Ct, and it is safe and out of the way. C 6/29/2025 07:13 PM It’s fine. No need for excess construction projects, often taking years at a time for minimal change. Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM Lee Valley Circle was supposed to be reconstructed in 2020 (if I remember correctly). The street is pitted and breaking apart and I have heard nothing of plans to repair or replace the roadway surface. GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM As our neighborhood expressed several years ago to City Council, we still feel that our small section of this project could be adequately addressed via a mill and overlay approach, rather than a full reconstruction. CharlieBray1 6/30/2025 03:22 PM We do not need sidewalks here. This is a residential street and it would be a giant waste of money. There is not enough traffic to warrant this spending. Anything I can do to prevent this from happening I will do. G 6/30/2025 09:39 PM Please do not narrow the street ( Antrim to Shannon) or put curbs in on either side from Antrim off 70th street to Shannon. It’s windy and even when you take the curve wide, it gets close to coming in contact with another car. If the street is narrowed in any way or curbs are put in there won’t be any space for cars to pass by. In the winter, the snow will make it even harder. Parking for maintenance vehicles, and guests will further the hinderance and will make it all but impossible to Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 43 of 52 Page 355 of 668 get two cars through. Please do not narrow Antrim road to Shannon road. It won’t work. JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM Speed limit too slow. Village Drive is a disaster. Needs repair. swankefamily 7/02/2025 06:53 AM Traffic volume--both vehicle and pedestrian--is minimal on our dead- end street. We currently don't have sidewalks, and we don't need them, as people can walk safely without them. Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM The streets are wide enough that sidewalks seem redundant and unnecessary. There is no need. It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t actually exist. Karin Wentz 7/03/2025 06:01 AM We hope our street (Down Road) stays as is--for example, we would strongly discourage adding sidewalks. The trees along the street are a desirable feature to keep, and these might need to be removed if sidewalks are added. druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM Neighbors who intentionally put yard debris into the street expecting the city to remove it is unacceptable and should be punished. Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM I am strongly against adding sidewalks to fleetwood drive as it would make the roads smaller and we do not have enough traffic for this to make any sense. Use our money elsewhere. MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM Wondering when Edina plans to upgrade our street? jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM Our neighborhood does not need sidewalks. It’s a low traffic area. Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM I’m not interested in getting the sidewalk or bike path. Will make road to small and to congested Liz Moore 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Other than Lanham Lane is a pothole disaster and no amount of resurfacing will help. Linda Berg snow plow always leaves huge pile of snow @ end of our Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 44 of 52 Page 356 of 668 7/12/2025 10:53 AM driveway….is by the mail box & unssafe dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM The streets feel safe and everyone drives carefully as it is not a through street so we all know the people coming and going. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM No sidewalks - people have plenty of nearby parks. all it would add is more upkeep and costs for village and taxpayers. Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM The street is in good condition and no sidewalks or bike paths are needed or wanted. rm 7/20/2025 01:41 PM Our street has minimal car traffic. Lots of people walk and bike with no problem Liz Moore 7/23/2025 11:47 AM It's very safe. Students from nearby high school practice skiing using roller blades. Our street is hilly and perfect for this. No sidewalks please. Lanham Lane is great without them. Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM No issues experienced over the last 25 years EdinaChris 8/06/2025 11:03 AM Please don't add sidewalks to Kemrich Drive as they aren't necessary given the low traffic volume. It will also damage the curb appeal of many homes. Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM I know that there is a plan to put a sidewalk on Fleetwood Drive. From my perspective, I don't feel unsafe walking on the street (and see people walking all of the time). I do have safety concerns regarding kids biking on our streets, however. I'm worried that if we had a sidewalk (and my understanding is that bikers, maybe with the exception of very young kids, are not supposed to bike on sidewalks), that the narrower street will make it even more unsafe for kids to bike on the street. CJM 8/08/2025 06:58 AM Kemrich Drive is very quiet street, walking and biking is very safe. I walk multiple times a day throughout Kemrich, Lanham, and Fleetwood. Many people walk in groups and with strollers along side their children on bikes, it is very safe to do so. Sidewalks are not needed and would even prohibit the group from staying together. Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 45 of 52 Page 357 of 668 Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM Cars speed coming around the bend at Antrim Road and Dublin Often drinking on wrong side of road jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM Don't put in barrier curbing. It forces bikes farther from the edge. Likewise, narrowing the street also forces bikes and pedestrians closer to the traffic, contrary to the talk about being bike friendly. Drive through Braemar on Hillary and see the flooding only where there is curbing. Patrick Horan 9/27/2025 03:21 PM Even though I live on Lanham, I think it is a bad idea to put a sidewalk in on Fleetwood or anywhere else in this neighborhood. It will turn into a dangerous skateboard ramp and there really isn't any need or desire. for this. Very poor planning and you should listen to the people who live here. trendahl 9/29/2025 06:48 AM The neighborhood street configuration is currently good and doesn’t need to be reimagined. The amount of foot traffic on our street is extremely low and doesn’t not warrant the need for sidewalks. Additionally, due to being on a hill adding sidewalks would narrow the street which is not ideal and potentially cause even steeper driveways on the even side of the street. Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Roads in prospect hills could use resurfacing, that is all MeganL 10/07/2025 06:10 PM I am 100% for getting a new paved street even with a $10-15K assessment. I am strongly opposed to narrowing the street & adding a sidewalk as our street is pretty steep - with steep inclines/driveways to access homes. I also do not think a sidewalk is needed in this neighborhood as there are sidewalks surrounding it on all 4 sides. Why is one needed going through the middle of the neighborhood- this is not a cut through neighborhood. However if the city deems one necessary, I would ask if you’ve looked at adding it on Lanham as it’s wider & less steep. DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM Regarding our two-block section of Shannon Dr., traffic is moderate and the street condition is reatively good. Optional question (47 response(s), 34 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 46 of 52 Page 358 of 668 JamesD 6/28/2025 11:32 AM 7204 Lanham Lane Klstone 6/28/2025 11:55 AM 5501 Village Drive Sarah J 6/28/2025 12:28 PM 5804 kemrich Drive Jeff b gisselbeck 6/28/2025 03:09 PM 7008 Lanham ln Salaar 6/28/2025 03:11 PM 7001 Lee Valley Circle John Uecker 6/28/2025 03:43 PM 7105 Alan Weiner 6/28/2025 03:46 PM 7105 Tralee Drive Joe Johnson 6/28/2025 04:48 PM 123 condo dr thomaspmagne 6/28/2025 04:51 PM 7125 Shannon Dr. Scott Williams 6/28/2025 05:18 PM 5805 Kemrich Dr. cgaz 6/28/2025 06:15 PM 5544 Village Drive, Edina 55439 peter334 6/28/2025 07:44 PM 7032 Wexford Rd Melissa Cohen 6/28/2025 08:12 PM 7100 Fleetwood Drive Q25 What is your address? Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 47 of 52 Page 359 of 668 mas54po 6/29/2025 07:13 AM 7117 Tralee Dr. Edina 55439 Nancy Drake 6/29/2025 09:20 AM 5900 Lee Valley Road Elizabeth Bennett 6/29/2025 11:20 AM 7112 Shannon Drive Paul Cashin 6/29/2025 11:47 AM 7009 Weston Cir cristina notermann 6/29/2025 11:55 AM 7221 fleetwood drive Matt Melsen 6/29/2025 01:06 PM 7108 Fleetwood Dr Roger Thomas 6/29/2025 01:34 PM 7109 Antrim Court tiamat2pi 6/29/2025 01:49 PM 7001 Dublin Road Laura Gillund 6/29/2025 02:14 PM 7020 Weston Circle ndanielsen 6/29/2025 02:25 PM 7100 Shannon Drive michael.r.lommel 6/29/2025 02:34 PM 7017 Lanham Lane Dublin 6/29/2025 02:53 PM 6000 Dublin Circle Dan! 6/29/2025 02:58 PM 7101 Antrim CT Brutlag 6/29/2025 04:05 PM 7109 Fleetwood Drive Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 48 of 52 Page 360 of 668 Heath Marnach 6/29/2025 05:59 PM 7201 Lanham Ln C 6/29/2025 07:13 PM Kemrich Drive Brian 6/30/2025 06:23 AM 7015 Lee Valley Circle Johnmlohmann 6/30/2025 06:41 AM 7101 Tralee Dr Steven Manacek 6/30/2025 11:00 AM 5901 Lee Valley Road GGood 6/30/2025 12:02 PM 7028 Shannon Drive CharlieBray1 6/30/2025 03:22 PM 7212 Fleetwood Drive desa0080 6/30/2025 04:32 PM 7208 Fleetwood Drive Edina MN 55439-1810 G 6/30/2025 09:39 PM 5908 Lee Valley Road JanFS 7/01/2025 02:43 AM 5501 Village Drive maggiedevoe 7/01/2025 05:26 AM 6004 Dublin Circle tamie 7/01/2025 09:14 AM 5511 village drive swankefamily 7/02/2025 06:53 AM 7020 Shannon Drive, Edina, MN 55439 EITAN MEDINI 7/02/2025 08:28 AM 7121 Fleetwood Dr Edina MN 55439 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 49 of 52 Page 361 of 668 Steve Thompson 7/03/2025 05:23 AM 5805 Shannon Dr. Karin Wentz 7/03/2025 06:01 AM 7029 Down Road, Edina, MN 55439 ElectronLady 7/03/2025 10:10 AM 7133 SHANNON DR Barbara Grossman 7/04/2025 08:39 AM 7300 Lanham Lane druckd666 7/05/2025 08:10 AM 7113 Shannon Drive terrirovick 7/05/2025 10:18 AM 7100 Down Road Ryan 7/06/2025 02:20 PM 7216 Fleetwood Drea 7/06/2025 04:24 PM 7105 fleetwood dr MTK 7/06/2025 05:17 PM 7112 Lanham Lane sburns 7/06/2025 07:33 PM 5725 Kemrich Dr Keith Solsvig 7/08/2025 01:02 PM 5713 Kemrich Drive jachapman9094 7/08/2025 03:59 PM 5721 Kemrich Drive Csazenski 7/09/2025 09:59 PM 7024 lanham lane Liz Moore 7041 Lanham Lane (Transcribed by City Staff) Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 50 of 52 Page 362 of 668 7/10/2025 12:53 PM Linda Berg 7/12/2025 10:53 AM 7104 Shannon Drive, Edina, MN 55439 John F Kortebein 7/13/2025 12:14 PM 7028 Lanham Lane Mwild 7/13/2025 05:47 PM 7013 Dublin Rd dubesbennett 7/15/2025 03:48 PM 5708 Kemrich Drive Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:20 PM 7024 Down Road (Transcribed by City Staff) Liz Moore 7/16/2025 12:26 PM 7104 Shannon Drive (Transcribed by City Staff) SusanJ 7/17/2025 07:34 AM 5553 VIllage Drive PXO 7/19/2025 10:33 AM 5800 Kemrich Drive. rm 7/20/2025 01:41 PM 7217 Fleetwood Drive Chazbo711 7/21/2025 10:48 AM 5511 West 70th St Edina MN 55439 francis.glover 7/23/2025 08:16 AM 7201 Fleetwood Drive Liz Moore 7/23/2025 11:47 AM 7220 Lanham Lane (Transcribed by City staff) Debasish N Mallick 7/28/2025 01:33 PM 5709 Kemrich Drive, Edina, MN 55439 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 51 of 52 Page 363 of 668 EdinaChris 8/06/2025 11:03 AM 5721 Kemrich Jamie Glover 8/07/2025 01:19 PM 7201 Fleetwood Dr CJM 8/08/2025 06:58 AM 5705 Kemrich Drive rdizzo 8/11/2025 12:10 PM 7100 Shannon Dr Normamuldowney 8/11/2025 05:38 PM 6 Antrim Terrace jelliott5904 8/14/2025 11:25 AM 5904 Lee Valley Road Patrick Horan 9/27/2025 03:21 PM 7212 Lanham Lane trendahl 9/29/2025 06:48 AM 7204 Fleetwood Dr Nick305 10/06/2025 03:11 PM Fleetwood drive Em22sunshine 10/07/2025 09:47 AM 7104 Fleetwood Drive MeganL 10/07/2025 06:10 PM 7101 Fleetwood Drive Askeyj 10/16/2025 10:03 AM 5545 Village Drive DonRep 10/31/2025 09:08 AM 5809 Shannon Dr. Mandatory Question (81 response(s)) Question type: Single Line Question Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey : Survey Report for 01 April 2025 to 16 November 2025 Page 52 of 52 Page 364 of 668 APPENDIX J Correspondence from Residents Page 365 of 668 1 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Tuesday, November 25, 2025 11:01 AM To:'Jane Mosher' Subject:7220 Lanham Ln - Water Service Jane, Can you call me to clarify your request for a “deduct” on the estimated assessment? Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Jane Mosher Sent: Monday, November 24, 2025 3:46 PM To: MJ Lamon <MLamon@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Question EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, Our street Lanham Lane, is to be reworked April of 2026. My question has to do with a water main disaster in 2024. We had to pay $5,000 for repairs. Will this be able to be deducted from the assessment this next year? Our neighbor across the street in undergoing this now. Those of us who have experience this awful happening need to know. Thank you in advance, Jane Mosher Page 366 of 668 4 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, November 24, 2025 3:38 PM To:'rhonda bland' Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls - 12/8 Public Hearing Rhonda, If you’re not able to attend in person, you can watch the Council meeting on Edina TV at the link below and call in to the meeting. 1. Call in to provide live testimony at 312-535-8110 the night of the meeting and enter access code 2633 585 6275, password is 5454. 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfOsQSVuJlQ&list=PL7138B234E20A912A&index=2 Thank you. Have a great Thanksgiving holiday! Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: rhonda bland Sent: Monday, November 24, 2025 1:24 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Prospect Knolls - 12/8 Public Hearing EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Aaron. I understand that the main point of the meeting on the eighth is for the project will be formally approved. It is also my understanding that more detailed information will not be given until sometime in the spring. If that is the case, there is no need for me to be present on the eighth. Have a great Thanksgiving! Rhonda . Page 367 of 668 5 On Nov 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Rhonda, The Public Hearing is on 12/8 at 6 PM. Letters will be mailed this week, and I will post the letter details on the project website as well. There are two additional projects that evening. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls/widgets/100707/key_dates#35417 Thank you. <image001.gif> Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 368 of 668 6 Ben Jore From:Andrew Reinisch Sent:Monday, November 24, 2025 10:28 AM To:Aaron Ditzler Cc:Jane Soltau; James Hovland Subject:RE: Yard Cleanup 7116 Fleetwood Drive Aaron, I reached out to Jane on the 14th when this came in, sorry for not including everyone. I believe this specific issue is resolved and Jane has my contact information for any future issues. Let me know if anyone has questions. Thanks! Andrew Reinisch, Engineering Technician 952-903-5728 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 AReinisch@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2025 8:50 AM To: Andrew Reinisch <AReinisch@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Jane Soltau James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Yard Cleanup 7116 Fleetwood Drive Andy, Can you investigate which private utility is responsible for cleanup and reach out to them and Jane Soltau at 7116 Fleetwood Dr? Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2025 7:07 PM To: Jane Soltau Cc: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Yard Cleanup 7116 Fleetwood Drive Aaron, will you please have someone respond to Ms. Soltau? She is understandably frustrated with the subcontractors. Thanks, Jim Hovland Page 369 of 668 7 James Hovland, Mayor JHovland@EdinaMN.gov EdinaMN.gov From: Jane Soltau Sent: Friday, November 14, 2025 11:15:59 AM To: City Council <citycouncil@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Yard Cleanup 7116 Fleetwood Drive EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have written to you before about what a mess was left in my yard by the 2 underground lines installed. My new complaint came from my fall yard cleanup crew. They ran into this plastic pipe that was left. Under further inspection, we realized the clean up crew tried to bury the pipe and multiple large branches they had cut. This is the 3rd time I have had to clean up the same tree and the 25th flag I have had to pull out of my yard. Is anyone at the city responsible for managing the utility clean up crews? Jane Soltau Page 370 of 668 8 Sent from my iPhone Page 371 of 668 3 From:Chad Millner Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 12:33 PM To:Sharon Allison; Cc:Kari Sinning; Kate Agnew; Scott H. Neal; Aaron Ditzler Subject:RE: Petition Against Sidewalks On Lanham Lane, Fleetwood Drive, and Kemrich Drive Attachments:Petition re sidewalk Lanham and Fleetwood.pdf We have received the petition and will submit it as part of the Dec. 2 Council Packet. Residents can speak to it at the Dec. 8 City Council Meeting on the project. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering He/Him 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sharon Allison <SAllison@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2025 12:11 PM To: Cc: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov>; Kari Sinning <KSinning@EdinaMN.gov>; Kate Agnew <kagnew@EdinaMN.gov>; Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Petition Against Sidewalks On Lanham Lane, Fleetwood Drive, and Kemrich Drive Anna – Councilmember Agnew forwarded your petition to staff. Our petition process is for Council to formally accept the petition and forward it to the appropriate department for consideration. City engineering Chad Millner (or his staff) will assist with this process. Please do not hesitate to reach out to him if you have any questions. Regards, Sharon Allison, City Clerk, MCMC 952-826-0408 | Fax 952-826-0390 SAllison@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Anna Jenks Date: November 16, 2025 at 11:37:04 PM CST To: Kate Agnew <kagnew@edinamn.gov> Subject: Petition Against Sidewalks On Lanham Lane, Fleetwood Drive, and Kemrich Drive Page 372 of 668 Page 373 of 668 5 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 9:48 AM To:'Anna Jenks' Cc:Chad Millner Subject:Lanham and Fleetwood sidewalk Petition Attachments:Petition re sidewalk Lanham and Fleetwood.pdf Anna, We will enter the attached petition on the December 1 City Council meeting on consent agenda stating that discussion on the item will occur at the December 8 Public Hearing. Some notes:  Everyone in the project area will receive a letter in the mail soon after November 20 inviting them to attend or participate at the December 8 Public Hearing.  You, and anyone else wishing to speak, will have an opportunity to speak on the petition at the December 8 Public Hearing.  Typically, individuals have three minutes to speak to the City Council. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Anna Jenks Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2025 11:34 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Lanham and Fleetwood sidewalk project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Aaron, I am writing to present the attached Petition Against the Installation of Sidewalks on Lanham Lane and Fleetwood Drive to the Edina City Council. An overwhelming 85% of the residents from Lanham Lane, Fleetwood Drive, and Kemrich Drive, who had the opportunity to sign, have expressed their opposition to the proposed sidewalk installation. We urge the City Council to consider the voices of its residents and reject this project. Your attention to our community's concerns is greatly appreciated. If there is an opportunity for me to present the petition or speak to the City Council, please let me know when I could do that. Additionally, please feel free to contact me with any questions or for further discussion regarding this petition. Page 374 of 668 6 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Anna Jenks 7016 Lanham Lane, Edina MN 55439 On Monday, October 27, 2025 at 08:39:36 AM CDT, Aaron Ditzler <aditzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Anna, You can email me a scanned copy of the petition or mail it to my attention. We’ll likely enter the petition on the November 18 City Council meeting on consent agenda stating that discussion on the item will occur at the December 8 Public Hearing. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Anna Jenks Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2025 4:51 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Lanham and Fleetwood sidewalk project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 375 of 668 7 Hello Aaron, I live on Lanham Lane in Edina where the city is planning to install a sidewalk. I have collected signatures from almost all of the residents of Lanham and Fleetwood opposing these unnecessary sidewalks. What would be the best process for me to submit this petition? Thank you, Anna Jenks Page 376 of 668 8 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Wednesday, November 12, 2025 10:14 AM To:'kjchristensen' Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls street project Attachments:Utility Upgrade Letter 2025.docx; Contractors List Sewer Water.pdf Kathy, Thank you for reaching out. Responses to your questions: 1. It’s not mandatory to evaluate your sewer service before the project begins, but it is recommended. 2. See attached utility upgrade letter from the 2025 reconstruction project, as well as a list of contractors. 3. The City will replace its portion of the water service as shown with letters “A” and “E” on the attached exhibit. 4. It’s not critical to evaluate your water service as shown with letter “B” on the attached exhibit. This is outside the project area and if you have issues in the future, it can be replaced without additional roadway and curb replacement costs. 5. Reach out to a contractor and tell them the City plans to reconstruct your neighborhood in 2026 and you’re looking for a quote to televise your sewer service and to provide recommendations for potential improvements based on its condition. 6. The sewer service televising can happen any time this fall / winter or next spring. 7. After you receive the sewer televising results. a. Best case scenario your sewer service is fine, and no improvements need to be made. b. If you need a sewer repair, I recommend getting at least two quotes. c. If there is a sewer repair needed and it’s not urgent, please let us know you have a sewer repair, and what type of repair the contractor is recommending. i. If the repair type is lining, typically it can happen any time after construction begins. ii. If the repair type is open cut trenching, we’ll want to talk schedule with your contractor. d. If there is a sewer repair needed and it’s an emergency, have it repaired as soon as possible. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: kjchristensen Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 2:00 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls street project Page 377 of 668 9 EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello- Can you please let us know if we need to evaluate both our sewer and water lines prior to the street construction? Can you please send us the list of contractors who can do this work and what we should be asking them to do? When are you recommending that we have the inspections? (If they should be completed by the spring, is it sufficient to have them this fall because we may not be in town in the spring?) If we need repairs or replacements when do they need to be completed by? Thank you. Kathy Christensen 7205 Lanham Lane Page 378 of 668 10 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, October 31, 2025 12:08 PM To: Subject:RE: 2026 Road Reconstruction Good news. Happy to help with future questions Don. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sent: Friday, October 31, 2025 11:23 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: 2026 Road Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks Aaron, I filled out the Survey and will reach out to Jamie. Regards, Don Roepke From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 9:35 AM To: Subject: RE: 2026 Road Reconstruction Don, Thank you for reaching out. Here is a link to the Prospect Knolls project page, and an attached photo showing where to find the survey. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls Please reach out to Jamie regarding Assessment Deferral details. Jamie Erickson jericksen@EdinaMN.gov Phone: 952-826-0424 Page 379 of 668 11 Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 4:23 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 2026 Road Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Aaron, My wife and I are long term (50 year) Prospect Knolls Edina home owners. We live within the area that is currently scheduled for road reconstruction next Spring. I received a City reminder note to complete the Roadway Reconstruction Survey by 10/31. But I was unable to find it on the Better Together Edina site. Also, as seniors in our 80’s, and at a low income stage of our lives, it is our understanding that the assessment associated with the road reconstruction can be deferred. We’re wondering how we can get more information regarding the deferment. Thanks for your help, Don Roepke 5809 Shannon Dr. Edina, MN 55439 Page 380 of 668 12 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, October 10, 2025 1:44 PM To: Cc:'Karin Stone' Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls Neighborhood Veronica, Sorry for the confusion. The properties north of Village Drive with access only from W. 70th Street will NOT be assessed (zero REU’s) with the Village Drive road reconstruction. I’ve updated the map on the Better Together project website. See updated link below. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/29140/widgets/100710/documents/71893 Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 12:52 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: City Council <citycouncil@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls Neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I, as well as a few of my neighbors in my community, attended the August 28, 2025 informational meeting to learn about the planned assessment associated with the Village Drive road reconstruction project. My fellow homeowners and myself were advised by one of the City's managers onsite at that meeting that our community, which resides to the north of Village Drive but does not have walk or drive access to that road, would NOT experience any assessments for that project. I'm very confused by the posted maps and information on the Better Together Edina site that seem to disagree with that comment or even the documents attached seem to contradict each other. Could you please respond to me ASAP to clarify if homeowners living in Highcroft East and Highcroft West (5501-5565 West 70th Street) will in fact be financially impacted by this project, or some other project that I cannot determine. Our homes are accessed on 70th Street which is not a city road from what I understand. Thank you, Page 381 of 668 14 From:Nick no Sent:Monday, October 6, 2025 6:15 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Prospect-knolls: Resident Survey EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you! From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2025 11:26 AM To: Nick no Subject: RE: Prospect-knolls: Resident Survey Nick, Sorry. Either of these links should take you to the survey. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls/surveys/recon-survey https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls?tool=survey_tool#tool_tab Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Nick no Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2025 6:55 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect-knolls: Resident Survey EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron, my name is Nick Dalbec, resident at 7104 Fleetwood Dr. I recieved a post-card in the mail about the informational video recored on 8/26 and an opportunity to ocmplete the Rsident Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey that could complete by Oct 31, 2025. Unfortunately there is no link or address provided for survey and the one I found online said it had already closed. Page 382 of 668 15 Could you please forward the link and if you could send an updated post card to all the residents with link / web-address that would be greately appreciated. Thanks Nick Page 383 of 668 16 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, October 3, 2025 12:13 PM To:'Susie Heim' Subject:RE: 7028 Down Road Attachments:7028 Down Rd Photo References.pdf Susie, See my responses below in red, as well as the attached PDF. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Susie Heim Sent: Friday, October 3, 2025 10:18 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 7028 Down Road EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Download full resolution images Available until Nov 2, 2025 Hello Arron, Thank you for the work you are putting into the Prospect Knolls road project. I am not clear if questions should go directly to you, but if not,could could pass them on to the appropriate person? We live at 7028 Down Road. There are some attached photos for you to refer to, if that is helpful. Below are questions we have regarding the project and our property: 1. Since we do not have existing curbing, how far into the drive and the yard will the project encroach? a. We haven’t started the design yet. Generally during construction, the construction limits are approximately 10-lf from the edge of the road for the work and / or storing materials. Based on the topography and trees at your property I would say up to 5-lf along the road, keeping a buffer from the trees. See the attached PDF for estimated driveway limits. Page 384 of 668 17 2. Will the mail box need to be replaced? It sits about 4 feet back from the road. a. See my response in the attached PDF. 3. The drive is a terra cotta colored concrete. Will you replace that color? a. See my response in the attached PDF. 4. There are a number of small new native bushes planted last year along the road. We imagine we will need to move some of them. How far back from the road edge should we plan on clearing? Since they are just getting established, we would like to move as few as possible. a. I would say a up to 5-lf along the road. The City’s contractor can replace these if you prefer to not salvage. 5. Will you replace the mulch? a. Yes. 6. Regarding the project as a whole, Prospect Knolls is quite a large area. Will it be done all at the same time, or will it be done in sections, in which case, is there a plan as to which section would come first? a. The construction will be done in phases. We won’t know until late April if Down Road will be the first, last or middle phase. The contractor will determine the phasing. We’ll share the phase when we receive in April. Thank you for your time and energy. Sincerely, Steve and Susie Heim Page 385 of 668 18 Page 386 of 668 19 From:John Bergstrom Sent:Friday, September 19, 2025 2:23 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: 2026 Prospect Knolls Roadway Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Aaron, Thank you for sending this link and for addressing my many questions today. Best--John On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 1:30 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: John, Nice speaking with you today. Here is a link to the project website, as well as the news feed article including the video. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls/news_feed/informational-video-presentation Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 387 of 668 21 From:TIM DUFFY Sent:Wednesday, September 17, 2025 8:58 AM To:Andrew Reinisch; Aaron Ditzler Cc:Missy Subject:6001 Dublin Cir - Private Utilities Attachments:20250911_071847.jpg EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron and Andrew, We appreciate your help with getting Xfinity/Comcast to finish installing the cable which they forgot about. Attached is a picture of their final work product. Rather than unscrew the bolt on the bottom of the outlet box and flip it up on the top and put the bolt back in, the service people appear to have ripped of the top. They balanced the outside cover on the unit but it fell off shortly thereafter. Any help in getting this fixed would be appreciated. Thanks Tim & Missy Duffy Page 388 of 668 From: To:City Council; Aaron Ditzler Cc: Subject:2026 Prospect Knolls A/C/D Road Project - Kemrich Drive Date:Monday, September 15, 2025 1:29:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Edina Engineering Team, We are writing to share our concerns regarding the planned reconstruction of Kemrich Drive as park of the ProspectKnolls A/C/D Roadway Reconstruction Project. While our neighborhood supports infrastructure upgrades such as road surface and utility replacements (andpotentially sidewalk additions), we have serious reservations about the City’s process around this project including,the proposed narrowing of the street without proper study and design, and the conditions by which sidewalks wouldbe added (again without proper study and design and without risk analysis performed). Kemrich Drive and Fleetwood drive are unique streets due to their topographic design, geometry, and usagepatterns. We are concerned that narrowing of the roads will make the roads less safe for our children (and otheradults) who use the roadways for recreational purposes including bike riding. We would like to request that the city and engineering team take more time to evaluate the needs of ourneighborhoods. If sidewalks are determined to be the best option, then we request that the city and engineering teamtake time to do analysis of the topography of the roads/yards to ensure sidewalks are being placed appropriately. In relation to our specific property (5804 Kemrich Drive), we would like the engineering team to note that our steepdriveway currently presents challenges to low profile cars and hitch/accessory attachments on vehicles and we hopethat the project is able to make our driveway more (and not less accessible). Currently, sedans and other low ridingvehicles and cars with bike racks/hitches bottom out when exiting our driveway. We would like the engineeringteam to work with us to ensure that all cars (and cars attachments such as bike racks) can easily enter and exit ourproperty without causing damage to cars, the road, or new apron/sidewalk features. Thank you,Sarah Lenhardt5804 Kemrich Drive Page 389 of 668 22 From:James Hovland Sent:Friday, September 12, 2025 5:48 PM To:Nicole Danielsen; Aaron Ditzler Cc:Andrew Scipioni; Scott H. Neal Subject:Re: Neighborhood Safety Concern – Request for Prospect Knolls Project Thanks, Nicole. I appreciate the additional input from you. Has staff further responded to Nicole? James Hovland, Mayor JHovland@EdinaMN.gov EdinaMN.gov From: Nicole Danielsen Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 1:10:00 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov>; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Neighborhood Safety Concern – Request for Prospect Knolls Project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Thank you for your response. I understand that the concerns I have raised weren't included in the original plan for this project. However, I would ask that moving forward, the city coordinates with the Edina Schools transportation team, as students in this area are asked to walk to either Dewey Hill Road (if they qualify for busing) or to VVMS/EHS (if they don't qualify for busing) and currently those walking/biking routes feel unsafe. You did mention the possibility of restricting parking to one side of the street, and while I know that I am only speaking as one individual, I would say there is not much street parking in this neighborhood and therefore, that would not feel like a hardship. Thank you for your consideration, Nicole On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 5:15 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Nicole, See response below following discussion with our Transportation Planner, Andrew Scipioni. Page 390 of 668 23  On-street pedestrian facilities are not recommended by the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, nor are they an industry best-practice. They are most often used as a temporary treatment before an agency constructs a permanent sidewalk. o Providing an on-street facility along Shannon Drive would require either widening the entire roadway section (resulting in more construction impacts to adjacent properties) or removing parking on one side of the street. o Providing an on-street facility along Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Dublin/Antrim may be additionally difficult due to the sharp curves and additional space required for vehicle turning movements.  Sidewalks on these streets are not recommended by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. If there has been broader community feedback requesting sidewalks in this area, we could discuss the feasibility. o Adding sidewalks to these streets would also require either widening the entire section or removing parking on one side of the street. o Sidewalks are funded by the PACS Fund, which has a limited annual budget. Adding these sidewalks all the way to 70th St would significantly increase the cost to the PACS Fund and therefore reduce our ability to construct recommended multi-modal improvements elsewhere in the city. o These sidewalks would add maintenance responsibility to the adjacent property owners per the City’s current policy. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Nicole Danielsen Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:46 AM To: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Neighborhood Safety Concern – Request for Prospect Knolls Project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 391 of 668 24 Dear Mayor Hovland and Aaron, I hope this note finds you well. As you consider the upcoming Prospect Knolls project, I’m reaching out on behalf of families in our neighborhood with a request to improve pedestrian safety. We encourage that this project includes coordination with the school district, since many of the walkers in this neighborhood are students, and their routes to bus stops and school should be factored into planning. Specifically there's an opportunity along the stretch of road between Lee Valley Road and Kemrich Drive (by 7201-7205 Shannon). This spot is heavily wooded, curved, and has very limited visibility. Every morning and afternoon, children walk this route to get to and from their bus stop. Without a safe space for them to walk, it feels dangerous—especially with cars rounding the curves quickly. As you can imagine, this is made even worse in the winter when the road becomes narrower and pedestrians and cars are less stable on slippery roads. A painted pedestrian lane would make a world of difference. It would give kids (and neighbors out walking) a clear, safer place to be, and it would remind drivers to be more mindful as they pass through. This could also be beneficial along the winding stretch of Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Dublin/Antrim. Thank you for considering this request. Our families truly appreciate your commitment to keeping our city safe and providing more opportunities to walk and bike, especially for our students. I’d be happy to connect further or gather support from other parents and neighbors if that would be helpful. Warmly, Nicole Danielsen 7100 Shannon Drive Page 392 of 668 Page 393 of 668 26 On Sep 4, 2025, at 2:51 PM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Rhonda, Excluding your comment card, 3 additional residents noted an interest in undergrounding utilities. Let me know if I can be of additional help. Thank you. <image001.gif> Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Aaron Ditzler Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 11:17 AM To: 'rhonda bland' Subject: Undergrounding of Xcel Energy Infrastructure Process Rhonda, Not great news but attached is a summary of my email correspondence with Xcel Energy. Thank you. <image001.gif> Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Aaron Ditzler Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 3:22 PM To: 'rhonda bland' Subject: RE: Undergrounding of Xcel Energy Infrastructure Process Rhonda, I reached out to Xcel to see if they have a map or list of addresses connected to the overhead poles that would be included in the potential underground project. Standby for response. Thank you. Page 394 of 668 Page 395 of 668 28 prefer. Here is a summary of my conversation with Xcel Energy staff. “Considerations can be vastly different based on terrain, existing infrastructure, necessity of procuring new easements, required carrying capacity of infrastructure, etc. so there isn’t a good way to estimate general costs or information. The costs for conversion of overhead spans of wire to underground average around $8,000 to 10,000 per span for single phase primary, and closer to $15,000 per span for three phase primary. This is before we consider the conversion costs of infrastructure such as transformers, switchgear, etc., and also excludes conversion of individual residential services if they are overhead. Customers converting overhead services to underground more often than not have to work with a private electrician to verify that their meter socket is up to the current spec (socket has a lever bypass), and convert to a lever bypass meter socket if theirs is not up to spec. Additionally, the customers would have to coordinate with the respective communications companies on the poles to convert their existing infrastructure from overhead to underground. These would be ADDITIONAL costs above and beyond the Xcel Energy costs. I’m not sure what the costs would be from a telecom perspective, but it’s something that should also be considered. For neighborhood scale design projects, Xcel generally would request a retainer fee for the required design time, would be at least $10k. This retainer would go towards the overall cost of the project if customers decide to proceed with the project, but would be held if the customers opt to not move forward after the calculation of the final project cost. “ Thank you. <image001.gif> Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 396 of 668 29 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, September 12, 2025 12:14 PM To:'Elizabeth Bennett' Cc:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Prospect Knolls - Street Reconstruction Design Attachments:Prospect Knolls - Street Reconstruction - Student Pedestrian Path to Bus Stop.jpg; Prospect Knolls - Street Reconstruction - Blind Hairpin Curves or Intersections.jpg Elizabeth, Sorry for the late response. See response below following discussion with our Transportation Planner, Andrew Scipioni. 1. Coordinate with the bus company a. We will share your request to relocate the stop with the Edina School Bus coordinator. b. The City can’t direct the coordinator to make the change. 2. Safety improvements on walking route a. On-street pedestrian facilities are not recommended by the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, nor are they an industry best-practice. They are most often used as a temporary treatment before an agency constructs a permanent sidewalk. i. Providing an on-street facility along Shannon Drive would require either widening the entire roadway section (resulting in more construction impacts to adjacent properties) or removing parking on one side of the street. ii. Providing an on-street facility along Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Dublin/Antrim may be additionally difficult due to the sharp curves and additional space required for vehicle turning movements. 3. Install street lights a. Street lighting could be added on two conditions. i. The adjacent property owners would be required to pay for the street light. Typical costs for a street light are approximately $10k per light. ii. A petition would need to be signed by all adjacent property owners saying they want the light and will pay for it. If one property doesn’t sign it, a light will not be added. 1. https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/906/Petition-Form-PDF 4. Paint at hairpin turns a. We do plan to install painted pavement markings on the hairpin turns following installation of the new pavement. 5. Designated bike / ped lane. a. See number 2 above. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 397 of 668 30 From: Elizabeth Bennett Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 10:46 AM To: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Prospect Knolls - Street Reconstruction Design EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Apologies for the double email. This time the aforementioned attachments are attached. Elizabeth Bennett On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 10:43 AM Elizabeth Bennett wrote: Mayor Hovland and Mr. Ditzler, I am writing to expand upon the concerns and suggestions I offered in my response to the Prospect Knolls road reconstruction survey as they pertain to safety. As school is now in session and I have two children walking to the bus stop, these safety concerns regarding our streets are of utmost importance. I hope you take the time to read my concerns as outlined below. If you have suggestions on how these solutions could be advanced, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me. Walking Route to Bus Stop Problem:  The bus stop for Valley View and Edina High School students living on Shannon Drive/Lee Valley is at the intersection of Shannon Drive and Dewey Hill Road. This bus stop location requires students coming from the north to navigate a particularly risky section of Shannon Drive. This area is just north of the intersection with Kemrich and has been marked yellow on the attachment named "Prospect Knolls - Road Reconstruction – Student Pedestrian Path to Bus Stop").  This stretch of roadway is particularly hazardous to pedestrians due to a number of factors, as outlined below. o The highlighted area is enclosed by trees and dense brush. Due to the heavy tree canopy this area is very dark with poor visibility for both pedestrians and drivers. The tree canopy makes this stretch treacherous even when it isn't dusk or dark, as drivers' eyes do not adjust quickly as they enter this heavily shadowed stretch creating a temporary blindness. As a pedestrian this is alarming as drivers do not see you in the Page 398 of 668 31 shadows. As a driver this is scary to suddenly realize there is a pedestrian along the shoulder. o The heavy brush along the roadway makes it difficult to step away from the road in the summer. In the winter, the snowbanks make it difficult to get out of the way of vehicles. o There are no streetlights on this treacherous section of the road. This is unacceptable. o This stretch is steep, and in the winter, it is very icy. There is no fix for the natural topography, but the other solutions offered below will provide additional protections for pedestrians. Solutions:  Coordinate with EPS to modify the pick-up location for the Shannon Drive/Lee Valley students as the walking route to the bus stop is unsafe.  Implement updates during the road reconstruction project to make the walking route to the bus stop safer for students by incorporating a designated pedestrian/bike lane marked by reflective paint. This will give drivers a guide to follow when entering this dark stretch and allow them to safely avoid pedestrians/bikes. This buffer will also provide a safety buffer to pedestrians. A pedestrian/bike lane is superior to a sidewalk in this scenario as the lane would be plowed and sanded by the city trucks and not rely upon homeowners to shovel/salt prior to the start of the school day.  Install street lights to this section to help alleviate the intense shade and shadow. Blind Corners Problem:  The steep topography in the Prospect Knolls neighborhood necessitates the roadways to incorporate several hairpin turns along the Lee Valley/Down Road/Antrim streets (see the attachment named "Prospect Knolls - Street Reconstruction - Blind Hairpin Curves or Intersections". These hairpin turns cause drivers to veer from their designated side of the street as they cut corners, often at excessive speeds given the terrain. Cars driving on the left side of the street pose a danger for oncoming traffic and pedestrians alike. Solution:  Paint a centerline in the roadway, especially around the hairpin corners. This will give cars a path to follow and help to slow down traffic as cars are forced to stay in their own lane, which provides safety for coming traffic and pedestrians. This option would add a minimal cost to the project.  Create a designated bike/pedestrian lane would also provide an additional safety buffer for pedestrians around these corners. I walk and drive these routes daily year-round and recognize the dangers that could be mitigated through tweaks to the reconstruction design. I would invite you to walk these routes and ask yourself if you would feel comfortable walking them or allowing your children to walk them as they are currently constructed. Additionally, please walk these routes at different times of the day and in Page 399 of 668 32 different seasons. My kids get off the bus at 4:30 PM at Dewey/ Shannon. In the winter, it will be dusk at that time and the roads are often icy. Would you feel more comfortable if simple safety features could be incorporated into the redesign? Thank you for your service to the City and for your commitment to advancing the well-being of all Edina residents. Sincerely, Elizabeth Bennett 7112 Shannon Drive Edina, MN 55439 Page 400 of 668 33 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, September 12, 2025 11:32 AM To:'K M' Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Follow Up Katie, Several residents had similar sidewalk questions, so we posted a news feed on the project website here. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls/news_feed/proposed-sidewalks-responsed-to-frequently- asked-questions Let me know if you have additional questions. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: K M Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2025 12:13 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Follow Up EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron, Thank you for the information during the meeting on this past Tuesday. Per our discussion, a few follow up items: 1. What was the main justification for the need for the sidewalk on Lanham/Fleetwood? 2. In the Living Street Plans, Lanham/Fleetwood is classified as a "local street" which sidewalks are an optional feature. Where/how did it become not optional? 3. Could you please connect me with the transportation individual who can answer questions on how/why Lanham/Fleetwood was determined to be a through street to get people from Dewey Hill to 70th? 4. How would a formal request for a special hearing meeting, possibly in November, be submitted? What is required? 5. Why were the neighborhoods near Countryside Elementary not recommended to have sidewalks due to the proximity to the school? The neighborhoods flow out to the main road of Benton to access the sidewalks to the school as do our neighborhoods around middle school and the high school flow out to the sidewalks on Antrim and 70th. 6. Who was the applicant that filed for the sidewalk? Or who filed for grant for the sidewalk on Lanham/Fleetwood? 7. Were there any safety studies performed that supports the need of the sidewalk? Can you please provide them? 8. How large is the drivable roadway now on Laham/Fleetwood and what would the drivable roadway size be with sidewalks? Page 401 of 668 35 From:Tom Petersen Sent:Tuesday, September 9, 2025 2:41 PM To:Ben Jore; Aaron Ditzler Cc:Zhanna Petersen Subject:Re: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you. We look forward to meeting with you next week. From: Ben Jore <BJore@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 2:14 PM To: Tom Petersen ; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Zhanna Petersen Subject: RE: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions Hi Tom, Per our conversation and the weather, I have postponed our site visit with you until Tuesday the 16th at 2:30pm. If this time does not work for you please let me know a few times that do and we can schedule accordingly. Thanks Ben Ben Jore, Senior Project Engineer 952-826-0321 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 BJore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Tom Petersen Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 10:21 AM To: Ben Jore <BJore@EdinaMN.gov>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Zhanna Petersen Subject: Re: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. That's great. We look forward to the conversation. Our neighbor, Laurel, has also expressed her desire to ask questions and may join us, if that is OK. Thanks again. Page 402 of 668 36 Tom From: Ben Jore <BJore@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 8:43 AM To: Tom Petersen ; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Zhanna Petersen Subject: RE: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions Hi Tom, Aaron and myself will plan to stop by Tuesday the 9th at 2:30pm. Thanks Ben Ben Jore, Senior Project Engineer 952-826-0321 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 BJore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Tom Petersen Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2025 11:18 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Zhanna Petersen ; Ben Jore <BJore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I work from home, so please feel free to drop by when you're available. I'll make time to talk. Tom From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2025 10:47 AM To: Tom Petersen Cc: Zhanna Petersen ; Ben Jore <BJore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions Tom, Thank you for reaching out. I think it would be helpful if we met with you at your property and looked at things in person. We’re available generally between 8 AM and 5 PM starting Thursday September 4. Are there a couple dates and times that work for you? Thank you. Page 403 of 668 37 Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Tom Petersen Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 12:46 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Zhanna Petersen Subject: Re: Road Construction 2026 Info session addl questions EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Adding pictures and another question about driveway. Would this be the first cut when considering concrete apron replacement? On Wed, Aug 27, 2025, 12:07 PM Tom Petersen wrote: Thank you and your cohorts for the info session and answering questions last night. It seemed that there were a lot of people concerned about sidewalks, so I didn't want to waste everyone's time with our specific situation. One of our main concerns, along with temporary parking on a dead end street, saving our old oak trees in the ROW, retaining wall replacement/creation, are how much our yard may be damaged by replacing/repairing storm drains/sewer lines. I believe we have an easement where the lines--both sewer and storm--run through our property from the cul-de-sac on Wexford Rd to Gleason. I noticed during your presentation a new slide that proposes the work done for these (could not find the presentation on the website). I've spoken to crews that were surveying in order to locate man-hole covers while they were inspecting the sewer with camera, etc. Although I understand design has not started, I'm guessing there may be preliminary results from the inspections that you will use to determine the extent of pipe removal/replacing or sleeves required to damaged/old pipes, but since our pipes are less than 20 years old could it be minimal? Is it possible to provide more detail on the extent of the work for this specific part of the project so we can be prepared for the December meeting and next year's work? Thanks. Tom Petersen 7032 Wexford Rd Page 404 of 668 38 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, September 8, 2025 3:13 PM To: Subject:Better Together Edina / Prelim Market Benefit Reports Pat, Responding to your voice mail, see the project website, and specific post referencing the market benefit reports below. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls/news_feed/informational-presentation-and-reference- documents Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 405 of 668 39 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, September 8, 2025 8:26 AM To:'Missy Duffy' Subject:RE: 6001 Dublin Cir - Private Utilities Good news Missy, thank you for the update. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Missy Duffy Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2025 4:15 PM To: Andrew Reinisch <AReinisch@EdinaMN.gov>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: 6001 Dublin Cir - Private Utilities EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you Aaron and Andrew for your quick follow-up. Someone from the cable company was here the same day and finished the following day. Appreciate your help - Missy Duffy On Sep 4, 2025, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Reinisch <AReinisch@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Hello Missy, I am Andy Reinisch, and I work with the private utility companies on these permits. I reached out to the project manager for this permit and he informed me that these lines were supposed to be buried last week. Due to issues with the utility locating companies, they were delayed in burring these lines until the locates were completed. The current schedule is to get these lines buried either tomorrow or Monday at the latest. Once the lines are buried, turf restoration efforts should begin. Please feel free to reach out to me directly if you have any questions or issues with this work. Thank you, <image001.gif> Andrew Reinisch, Engineering Technician 952-903-5728 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 AReinisch@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 406 of 668 40 From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 2:29 PM To: Missy Duffy Subject: 6001 Dublin Cir - Private Utilities Got it Missy. We’ll reach out to the private utility and try to push this forward to completion. Thank you. <image001.gif> Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Missy Duffy Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 2:01 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron - Thanks so much for listening today and helping us resolve this issue. Missy Duffy 6001 Dublin Circle <image002.jpg> <image003.jpg> <image004.jpg> <image005.jpg> <image006.jpg> <image007.jpg> Sent from my iPhone Page 407 of 668 41 From: Sent:Friday, September 5, 2025 2:44 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Undergrounding Utilities EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. No need. She's my next door neighbor and I obviously know her well. I already sent her a copy of the email exchange I had with you. I would have carbon copied her on what I sent you but I thought she might laugh at me for not having her experience. And I just wanted to say what I wanted to say. Thanks. Get Outlook for Android From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Friday, September 5, 2025 2:41:45 PM To: Subject: Undergrounding Utilities Can I share your address with She wants to take a lead role in undergrounding utilities on behalf of the neighborhood. You noted your interest in your email below. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 6:04 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Parkwood Knolls Street Project Feedback EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you for your reply. Get Outlook for Android From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 6:30:46 PM Page 408 of 668 42 To: Subject: RE: Parkwood Knolls Street Project Feedback See my responses below in red. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sent: Monday, September 1, 2025 11:55 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov>; Ben Jore <BJore@EdinaMN.gov>; Chris Moore <CMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Parkwood Knolls Street Project Feedback EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Aaron & team, I live at Thank you for the presentation last week about the Parkwood Knolls street upgrade. Similar to a few others I do not recall getting a survey about this project, so please accept this as my feedback based on what I know so far. First off, this was all new to me having recently moved here, I have owned perhaps 10 homes in other cities and never paid for a road outside taxes. It is bizarre concept. Several Minnesota cities use special assessments to fund roadway reconstruction, but not all of them do. Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Crystal, Maple Grove, Woodbury, etc. levy assessments. Each City Council decides how to fund these projects. Edina’s decided in the 1990’s to assess. I also want to thank you for your work on this, while I may not agree with aspects of the project I am not trying to say I know how to do your job. I would simply like my points to be heard and addressed. My feedback: 1. The 2015 plan that was referred to several times does not say which streets should have sidewalks and not. It is clear that everyone who attended the meeting does not want sidewalks as part of this plan, and yet the City will fund those, instead of contributing more to the costs of the streets. Seems like a strange way to respond to the people who pay taxes and live here - the people you technically work for. Page 409 of 668 43 a. The Pedestrian & Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund was approved by the City Council exclusively for specific improvements to the City’s non-motorized transportation network. b. Engineering does not have authority to decide to use PACS funds to fund roadway improvements. In November when we have the Better Together Edina testimony page set up, feel free to post these questions to the City Council. You will receive a mailing about the hearing and ways to contribute testimony. 2. I would like to know which firm was used to determine the value increases noted from this project? How many bids were solicited? What was the scoring rubric? Who else bid? Has this firm been used in prior projects? Are the any disclosed conflicts of interest with that firm and any staff of the City, elected or otherwise? Is there data from any prior projects they have done that suggested their value estimates are accurate, for example property sales post new street installations? a. Here is a link to the reports. 1. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls/news_feed/informational- presentation-and-reference-documents b. The appraisal firm was a direct select. c. This firm has prepared preliminary market benefit studies for the last five years or so. d. I see no conflict of interest. Feel free to review the certification section in the report. e. I have no sales data pre and post reconstruction projects. 3. The ratios of 0.5, 1.0 etc., seem arbitrary. I see lots in areas that are 0.5 that are nearly as large as mine and with similar frontage. Some examples: a. 7005, 7009 and 7017 Lee Valley Cir. b. 7008, 7012, 7016, 7020 Weston Cir. c. 7221 Tara Rd. d. 7100. 7001 Shannon Dr. e. 5721, 7315, and 7305 Kemrich Dr. f. Even some lots across the 'water tank' field from me 6013, 6009, 6005 Dublin Cir. g. I could go on, but I think you get my point. Please explain the math behind these seemingly arbitrary ratios. h. Please consider a formula based on lot size and frontage that is proportional and transparent, but I do not think people with corner lots should be double charged (i.e. maybe include half their total frontage). 1. Residential equivalent units (REU) is based on a single-family lot, regardless of lot front footage or lot area. 2. The properties with 0.5 REU will be assessed the remaining 0.5 REU when W. 70th St and Dewey Hill Road are reconstructed. 3. The Dublin Road and Tara Road 0 REU properties are not developable lots. 4. Engineering does not have authority to vary from the assessment policy noted here. 1. https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11369/Assessment-Policy- Dated-July-21-2021 4. There is a massive disincentive to this project happening in 2026 vs. 2027 or 2028 and so on. The sliding scale, which I think you said council came up with, lacks any rational justification. Of course we all want our roads to be done later, the City created that disincentive. There was no clear rationale given for why Parkwood Knolls now vs. later. The only rationale provided was it is costing the City too Page 410 of 668 44 much to maintain the roads and there are at least two water pipe issues. I think you need to come up with more than that. Those two items are specifically your problem to address within the taxes we already pay. Please explain why Parkwood Knolls now vs. later? a. The pavement ratings average for Prospect Knolls is the lowest in the City for local (low volume) streets. b. See slide 5 from the presentation. 1. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/29140/widgets/100710/documents/71889 5. If for example you need to replace the water pipe in Dublin Cir. which you mentioned, you should pay for the road directly being replaced to support that activity and deduct it from the TOTAL project. Same with any other roads to be replaced to upgrade/repair water pipes - my own street may also be like that. That would make more sense. I am not saying I should pay nothing, I am saying we should ALL pay bit less, and the City more. a. The pavement ratings for Prospect Knolls is the lowest in the City for local (low volume) streets. We’re taking advantage of the roadway recon to take care of utilities as well. 6. I heard that we are now paying a tax for future roads, and in addition this assessment, and we may also pay higher taxes if you raise the home values per the aforementioned value survey. This will be a point of contention for clear reasons: a. You hired the consultant. b. Given you want us to pay now, we should not also be charged now for the future roadways, rather only after 2035. c. And some assurance should be provided the value increase will not be used for property tax increases. 1. Again, Engineering does not have authority to vary from the assessment policy noted here. 2. The assessing department determines property values for use in property taxes independently of what Engineering is doing with the market benefit reports. 7. I would like to know what it would cost for the electric and utilities etc. to be buried when this project happens. This is a one-time opportunity to do that. 8. I would also like to know about street lights. My street is pitch black, no light within a block each way. At least have a consultant do a quick safety assessment for the project to make sure the roads are safe. That I think is the City's job. a. Data from the Police Dept shows only 1 safety incident in this block in the last ten years, which was a driver fleeing police. b. A street light could be added on on two conditions. 1. The adjacent property owners would be required to pay for the street light. Typical costs for a street light are approximately $10k per light. 2. A petition would need to be signed by all adjacent property owners saying they want the light and will pay for it. If one property doesn’t sign it, a light will not be added. 1. https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/906/Petition-Form-PDF 9. I think given there are some issues here you may want to make the project better for all in a few simple ways: Page 411 of 668 45 a. Review your 0.5, 1.0 allocation methodology and consider something more math/planning based and fair. b. Review why we are paying for this project what appears to be at least twice, maybe 3 times - future road taxes already in place, and this assessment and the potential additional future property tax increase. c. Eliminate the sideway from the project and apply that saving to lower the total cost. d. The City should pay to bury the electrics and utility and make the whole neighborhood look better. e. The City should make sure the street lights are safe and put new ones where needed at the same time. f. The City should pay for any road cost where water lines are being upgraded (for the benefit of a much wider area I'd add as these pipes also distribute water for you, outside Parkwood Knolls). As a final point, not specifically about this project - but clearly related to overall taxation which this is all about - I am surprised and concerned with what I have heard about the new fire station which I understand all residents are paying for. and may partly contribute to an up to 10% tax increase this year (3x inflation I might add). As you know many cities charge developers for such investments. In Edina for some reason this does not seem to be the case, rather on the opposite end of the scale my neighbors tell me you give tax incentives to get new projects built. If this is the case you need to stop giving away our money and stop giving away the best real estate in the state. You are being duped in my view. Companies build to make money and all you are doing is giving them more. I know you want lower cost housing and density. There are lots of state and Fed. programs for that - stop burdening us and I might add making our neighborhood unaffordable and driving down the property values you claim to be increasing. Taxes and assessments drive values down, NOT UP. a. Feel free to reach out to Economic Development Department or the City Manager that can better respond to your comments. 1. https://www.edinamn.gov/1920/Economic-Development 2. https://www.edinamn.gov/directory.aspx?eid=27 While I am fine with you summarizing my content into your overall community feedback notes, I do NOT consent to your posting my name, address and/or personal information on your web site or any other materials. I look forward to your reply and thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. Respectfully, Page 412 of 668 46 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, September 5, 2025 2:37 PM To: Subject:Undergrounding Utilities JeƯ, Can I share your address with Rhonda Bland at 7000 Kerry Road? She wants to take a lead role in undergrounding utilities on behalf of the neighborhood. You noted your interest on your comment card. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 413 of 668 47 From:Jamie Glover Sent:Wednesday, September 3, 2025 3:51 PM To:City Council Cc:Aaron Ditzler; Francis Glover Subject:2026 Prospect Knolls A/C/D Road Project - Fleetwood Drive EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council, We are writing to share our concerns regarding the planned reconstruction of Fleetwood Drive as part of the Prospect Knolls A/C/D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project. Our neighbors have come together to align on a common set of concerns and requests, which are outlined at the bottom of this email. However, I first wanted to share some of my personal concerns so you could hear some real examples of why we are reaching out on this issue. Our street, Fleetwood Drive, is a very steep and curvy street. Our concern is that narrowing the street (to accommodate a sidewalk) will be uniquely problematic given the nature of our street and will make it less safe. Our specific safety concerns are regarding:  Ice & Slipping -- we rely on our amazing Edina snowplows to make our street even somewhat walkable in the winter months. Given how steep it is, any ice build-up is a significant safety concern. We are intimately familiar with this because we walk our kids up the street every morning to the bus stop (and even a freshly plowed & salted Fleetwood Dr is hard to walk in the winter, given the steep grade). If snow & ice removal on our steep street rely on residents to remove, people will inevitably still try to walk on the now-narrower streets (see next bullet for the concern on narrower streets) -- defeating the purpose. In fact, our street is so steep and slippery that our Creek Valley school bus had to put their most experienced driver on our route last year (as the prior driver was getting stuck on the ice) to navigate our hills in the winter, and the bus has re-routed to going up the adjacent street (Lanham Lane) which is less steep.  Narrower Streets = Even Worse Sightlines -- our street has horrible sight lines, with the hill + curves combination. Even with the width that our street is at today, drivers struggle to see around and navigate if there is even one car parked on one side of the road. Given the unique nature of our street, I'm worried that driving and biking (see next bullet) will be less safe with narrower roads.  Bike Safety -- I think this change will make the street less safe for bikers, as they will use the now narrower roads with even worse sightlines. My son plans to bike to Valley View, starting next year, and this is a big concern for me even with the roads as wide as they are today. The sightlines are a current issue that make our street feel less than ideal for bike safety, and I think a narrower road will make it worse. Our family walks or bikes on Fleetwood Drive nearly everyday. We walk for exercise, and we bike to get to 70th&Cahill or to Braemar or to the High School/Valley View/Creek Valley schools. When we bought our house in 2020 and first learned that a sidewalk was being planned for our street, we thought we would love that addition (as we generally do prefer sidewalks for walking!). However, now that we live here and navigate the street everyday, we think the unique nature of the street is noteworthy -- and Page 414 of 668 48 that the proposed change would actually make the above existing issues with the street even worse, not better. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- We outline seven requests of the City council prior to approving the road reconstruction project. We stand with many neighbors on this issue and these requests. We are happy to present our letter and our requests in a City council meeting should you prefer an on-the- record conversation and meeting. Our requests: 1. Visit the site to meet with residents, to visualize, and to understand the unique nature of Fleetwood Drive. 2. Listen/watch the Q&A portion of the Neighborhood Kick-off Meeting. 3. Retain 30-ft width unless safety data specific to Fleetwood supports narrowing. 4. Exempt Fleetwood from sidewalks unless a full design and risk analysis supports the safety and practicality of the sidewalks on Fleetwood. 5. Exempt Fleetwood from sidewalks given driveway access issues unless a full design supports that residents will be able to access their properties. 6. Require updated appraisals in accordance with Minnesota statutes using complete designs and utilizing valid comparable neighborhoods depicting the market data prior to and after road reconstruction projects. 7. Perform a new neighborhood survey specific to Fleetwood drive regarding driving, biking and pedestrian concerns. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We look forward to your reply. Thank you, Jamie and Fran Glover 7201 Fleetwood Drive Cc: Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer and Project Lead Page 415 of 668 49 From:Matt Melsen Sent:Wednesday, September 3, 2025 9:14 AM To:City Council Cc:Aaron Ditzler; Kristina Melsen Subject:2026 Prospect Knolls A/C/D Road Project - Fleetwood Drive Attachments:7108 Fleetwood Drive - Letter of Concern.pdf; 7108 Fleetwood Drive - Letter of Concern - Cover.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council, Attached is a detailed letter from our household regarding the 2026 Prospect Knolls Road Reconstruction Project - specifically as it relates to Fleetwood Drive. We have also included a summarized, cover letter - in case you prefer to start with a summary. We outline seven requests of the City council prior to approving the road reconstruction project. We stand with many neighbors on this issue and these requests. We are happy to present our letter and our requests in a City council meeting should you prefer an on- the-record conversation and meeting. Our requests: 1. Visit the site to meet with residents, to visualize, and to understand the unique nature of Fleetwood Drive. 2. Listen/watch the Q&A portion of the Neighborhood Kick-off Meeting. 3. Retain 30-ft width unless safety data specific to Fleetwood supports narrowing. 4. Exempt Fleetwood from sidewalks unless a full design and risk analysis supports the safety and practicality of the sidewalks on Fleetwood. 5. Exempt Fleetwood from sidewalks given driveway access issues unless a full design supports that residents will be able to access their properties. 6. Require updated appraisals in accordance with Minnesota statutes using complete designs and utilizing valid comparable neighborhoods depicting the market data prior to and after road reconstruction projects. 7. Perform a new neighborhood survey with proper distribution measures and improved, fair survey methods. We look forward to your reply. Page 416 of 668 51 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Tuesday, September 2, 2025 5:15 PM To:'Nicole Danielsen' Cc:James Hovland; Andrew Scipioni Subject:RE: Neighborhood Safety Concern – Request for Prospect Knolls Project Nicole, See response below following discussion with our Transportation Planner, Andrew Scipioni.  On-street pedestrian facilities are not recommended by the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, nor are they an industry best-practice. They are most often used as a temporary treatment before an agency constructs a permanent sidewalk. o Providing an on-street facility along Shannon Drive would require either widening the entire roadway section (resulting in more construction impacts to adjacent properties) or removing parking on one side of the street. o Providing an on-street facility along Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Dublin/Antrim may be additionally difficult due to the sharp curves and additional space required for vehicle turning movements.  Sidewalks on these streets are not recommended by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. If there has been broader community feedback requesting sidewalks in this area, we could discuss the feasibility. o Adding sidewalks to these streets would also require either widening the entire section or removing parking on one side of the street. o Sidewalks are funded by the PACS Fund, which has a limited annual budget. Adding these sidewalks all the way to 70th St would significantly increase the cost to the PACS Fund and therefore reduce our ability to construct recommended multi-modal improvements elsewhere in the city. o These sidewalks would add maintenance responsibility to the adjacent property owners per the City’s current policy. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Nicole Danielsen Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:46 AM To: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Neighborhood Safety Concern – Request for Prospect Knolls Project Page 417 of 668 52 EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Hovland and Aaron, I hope this note finds you well. As you consider the upcoming Prospect Knolls project, I’m reaching out on behalf of families in our neighborhood with a request to improve pedestrian safety. We encourage that this project includes coordination with the school district, since many of the walkers in this neighborhood are students, and their routes to bus stops and school should be factored into planning. Specifically there's an opportunity along the stretch of road between Lee Valley Road and Kemrich Drive (by 7201-7205 Shannon). This spot is heavily wooded, curved, and has very limited visibility. Every morning and afternoon, children walk this route to get to and from their bus stop. Without a safe space for them to walk, it feels dangerous—especially with cars rounding the curves quickly. As you can imagine, this is made even worse in the winter when the road becomes narrower and pedestrians and cars are less stable on slippery roads. A painted pedestrian lane would make a world of difference. It would give kids (and neighbors out walking) a clear, safer place to be, and it would remind drivers to be more mindful as they pass through. This could also be beneficial along the winding stretch of Lee Valley/Down/Kerry/Dublin/Antrim. Thank you for considering this request. Our families truly appreciate your commitment to keeping our city safe and providing more opportunities to walk and bike, especially for our students. I’d be happy to connect further or gather support from other parents and neighbors if that would be helpful. Warmly, Nicole Danielsen 7100 Shannon Drive Page 418 of 668 53 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 11:26 AM To:'R&M Carlson' Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls project Attachments:Contractors List Sewer Water.pdf Richard, You’re welcome. See the attached contractor list. You could get your sewer service inspected any time, however I recommend holding off on any repairs until 2026, unless the repair is urgent. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: R&M Carlson Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 3:56 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Aaron, thank you for last evening's informative presentation. You mentioned that homeowners should have their sanitary sewer line inspected in advance of the project. We'd like to do that but wonder if it's too soon, should we wait until next spring? And, you mentioned there is a list of contractors who can do this job, can we ask to receive that list? Many thanks. Richard and Mari Carlson 7020 Kerry Road Page 419 of 668 54 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, August 25, 2025 5:09 PM To:'Matt Melsen' Subject:RE: Parkwood Knolls A/C/D Thanks for the conversation, Matt. Let’s touch base in mid to late January on the design at your driveway. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Matt Melsen Sent: Monday, August 25, 2025 2:49 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Parkwood Knolls A/C/D EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron - Looking forward to the info night tomorrow night...and hoping to make the entire event. I have two areas of concern which I'm hoping is addressed tomorrow. And, if not tomorrow, I'm curious when we'll learn more details in advance of City Council's review/approval. (1) Sidewalk on Fleetwood. I'm curious on the thought process leading to the location of sidewalks. I'm open to sidewalks - but I'm very concerned given Fleetwood's unique elevation changes from west-to- east which leads to steep driveways 'as is' which simply can't get steeper (ours at 7108 Fleetwood Dr). I would imagine Fleetwood was originally picked in the Living Streets plan as it's the most direct connection -- but I doubt the topography was fully considered at that time. It simply doesn't seem economical (see below for more detail). Our home is ~8-10 feet above the street leading to an extremely steep driveway 'as is'. It's likely the steepest in the neighborhood - but it's not alone in that it's steep (many homes have steep driveways). We already have a hard time getting in/out of our driveway without bottoming out...we simply can't lose any space. Based on my estimations, we have 4 feet to 'find' (~34 feet needed based on Living Streets guidelines less ~30 feet available). Page 420 of 668 55 Alternatively, Lanham seems like a much more viable option with a smoother west-to-east grade transition. While it's a longer route (leading to more cost), the smoother grade transition significantly reduces other costs (retaining walls) and qualitative factors (unmanageable slopes of driveways). (2) Project grouping with Lee Valley/Down/Antrim/etc. -- will the neighborhoods within the project be split into different pools/groupings? Or will the costs be disclosed accordingly - so we can understand the impact of the grouping on our assessment? It doesn't feel right to group Fleetwood/Lanham/Shannon/etc. with Lee Valley/Down/Antrim/etc. - as they aren't homogenous streets. Lee Valley/Down/Antrim/etc. are larger lots and they are far more complex (curvy, hilly, etc.) and, thus, I am led to believe their REU is far greater than Fleetwood/Lanham/etc. By grouping, Fleetwood/Lanham/etc. is subsidizing the other neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. If easier to discuss via phone, I'm available at Regards, Matt Melsen 7108 Fleetwood Drive Page 421 of 668 56 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, August 21, 2025 3:34 PM To:James Hovland; Scott H. Neal Subject:RE: internet cutoff at 7209 Shannon Dr. Comcast submitted a permit to restore the cable at 7209 and Andy approved the permit today. Hopefully restored soon. Sounds like there have been several false starts and scope of work misunderstandings on Comcast’s end. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 10:24 AM To: James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: internet cutoff at 7209 Shannon Dr. We can lean on USI from a permitting perspective. But aside from expressing sympathy and empathy, we are limited on this. It’s not our utility. We can’t do a repair on their equipment. Scott H. Neal, City Manager 952-826-0401 | Fax 952-826-0390 sneal@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 10:21 AM To: Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov>; Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: internet cutoff at 7209 Shannon Dr. EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I received a phone call from homeowner Carrie Carter at the above address stating that USI has cut the internet connection to the house in the process of doing the USI work, but nothing has been done to repair the same and restore service. Carrie says she has discussed with Andrew from Engineering but nothing has been done. What can we do to assist her and get the internet connection re-established to her home? I think her phone number is James B. Hovland Attorney at Law Page 422 of 668 58 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, August 21, 2025 12:58 PM To:James Hovland Cc:Andrew Scipioni; Scott H. Neal Subject:RE: OBJECTION TO A SIDEWALK Attachments:Prospect Knolls ACD Proposed Sidewalk.pdf Mayor Hovland, This is related to a proposed sidewalk associated with our 2026 roadway reconstruction project in Prospect Knolls as referenced in the attachment. We have an informational meeting with the residents on 8/26 at the Public Works building and the Public Hearing will be in December. We’ll remind the residents that there will be plenty of opportunity for feedback, and recommend they provide it on the Better Together website. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 10:51 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov>; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov>; Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Fw: OBJECTION TO A SIDEWALK Any idea what this is about? I don’t recall any discussion about street or sidewalk work in Parkwood Knolls. James Hovland, Mayor JHovland@EdinaMN.gov EdinaMN.gov From: Eitan Medini Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 10:45:25 AM To: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: OBJECTION TO A SIDEWALK EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 423 of 668 59 I OBJECT TO A SIDEWALK IN FLEETWOOD DR EITAN MEDINI Page 424 of 668 60 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, August 11, 2025 2:48 PM To:'Michael Lorberbaum' Cc:Cohen, Melissa Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls street reconstruction project Michael, Thank you for reaching out. Responses to your email. 1. The sidewalk decision will be made at the December 2025 City Council meeting, NOT at the informational meeting in August. 2. As far as influencing the sidewalk decision, we recommend speaking at the December 2025 City Council meeting. You can do this in numerous ways. a. In November prior to the meeting, webpage will be set up where you can write feedback which will be included in the City Council packet prior to the December 2025 City Council meeting. b. Speak in person at the CC meeting. c. Call in to the CC meeting. d. All of these will be included in the mailing you will receive in November for the December CC meeting. 3. The contractor will replace the impacted portion of your irrigation system at no additional cost to you. 4. The proposed 5-lf wide sidewalk will be for pedestrians. It’s not recommended for bicyclists. 5. There would have to be a unique situation for Engineering to recommend a pedestrian facility on the street, and I don’t see Fleetwood being that situation. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Michael Lorberbaum Sent: Friday, August 8, 2025 2:04 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Cohen, Melissa Subject: Re: Prospect Knolls street reconstruction project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron, I would like to express my strong desire to have the sidewalk somewhere other than my property. Adding a sidewalk will add meaningful and real costs from the reinstallation of our underground sprinkler system to annual snow removal to increases in insurance. Page 425 of 668 61 As a potential compromise, I would suggest removing the plan for a boulevard, putting this walking / biking path immediately next to the street, and paving the space instead of using cement. This is consistent with other walk/bike paths in Edina. Based on the prior note, it sounds like this decision will be made in late August. What is the best way to influence this decision? Thank you, Michael On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 12:30 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Melissa, See responses below. 1. The City will provide an estimated assessment range, per single family lot, by late August. 2. We'll likely have the sidewalk side determined by late August. 3. Currently, property owners on local streets are responsible for sidewalk maintenance, including snow and ice. It's my understanding that: a. the property owners are responsible for panel replacement if for example there are large cracks or significant heaving. b. Public Works will determine if sidewalk repairs are necessary. Liability is always determined per situation/case on factors. If a property owner had gutters directed into sidewalk discharging water and causing ice buildup (homeowner caused issue) versus a snow event made the sidewalk have snow and ice accumulation even after duty of care to remove via shoveling or snowblower (homeowner did not cause issue and performed duty of care). Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Melissa Cohen Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2025 10:26 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Ice - Michael Lorberbaum (husband) Subject: Prospect Knolls street reconstruction project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 426 of 668 62 Hello Aaron, My name is Melissa Cohen. My husband (Michael Lorberbaum) and I live at 7100 Fleetwood Drive. Today we received the postcard informing us about the planned roadway project next year. We have a number of questions: 1. What is the anticipated total cost of the project and what is the anticipated assessment to our property? If you don't know yet, when do you expect to know? 2. Our house is on the southwest corner of Fleetwood Drive and Lanham Lane. We have a very long stretch of property along both roads. We saw in the plan that a new sidewalk is expected. It did not specify which side of the street the sidewalk would go on. Do you know which side? 3. If it's on our side of the street, we expect to end up with a very long stretch of sidewalk on our property, potentially on both the Lanham side and the Fleetwood side. Although we like the idea of a sidewalk in the neighborhood, we have concerns about how this will affect our property and our own expenses and liability. For example, would we have responsibility for maintaining the sidewalk if it degrades in the future? Would we have responsibility of snow removal? What happens if someone was injured on the sidewalk on our property, could they hold us/our homeowners insurance liable? I appreciate you answering our questions. Also, I am sure other homeowners will have similar questions, so I hope to see more information and answers to these common questions posted publicly as well. I see there is a neighborhood meeting expected in September, but I think putting more information out to all homeowners sooner than later is much preferred. Thank you, Melissa Cohen Page 427 of 668 63 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, August 7, 2025 10:59 AM To:'Abbey Serati' Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls - fleetwood sidewalk construction Abbey, The assessment will be levied to each property owner in the neighborhood that is in the reconstruction area. The assessment amount is determined by the roadway project cost total, divided by the total number of residential equivalent units (REU) in the project area. A single-family home is 1 REU. We will notify property owners the assessment amount per REU. I hope I answered your question. If not, let me know and I’ll clarify. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Abbey Serati Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 3:39 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Prospect Knolls - fleetwood sidewalk construction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for the quick response. Are the assessment amounts paid for solely by the property owner? Or is it split between all the residents in the neighborhood? On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 3:30 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Abbey, Thank you for reaching out. Some notes: Page 428 of 668 64 1. You and the rest of the neighborhood will receive a postcard next week for an Information Meeting on 8/26 at the Edina Public Works Facility to learn more about the project. 2. We’ll have formal sidewalk location recommendations on 8/26. Tentatively the sidewalk is proposed along the west side of Fleetwood Dr. 3. We’ll have estimated assessment amounts on 8/26. The streets west of Shannon Drive with the larger lots may have assessment in $20k range. East of Shannon Drive, it’s unlikely the assessment amounts will exceed $15k per property. If property owners can’t attend the meeting on 8/26, we’ll post a video of the meeting on the project website in September https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Abbey Serati Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 11:00 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls - fleetwood sidewalk construction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello- Looking to find out more information regarding the sidewalk construction project for fleetwood drive. Neighbors have been talking about a 20k assessment for each household. As a property owner this is concerning. Any further information you can provide would be helpful. Thank you! Page 429 of 668 66 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, July 18, 2025 5:08 PM To: Subject:RE: street reconstruction John, Following up on your email. Concrete curb and gutter Here are some reasons why adding concrete curb and gutter is a standard for roadway reconstruction projects and we don’t plan to change for Prospect Knolls. 1. Pavement Edge / Structural Integrity a. Concrete curbs provide support to the asphalt pavement, reducing edge cracking, extending the pavement lifespan, reducing maintenance costs. 2. Enhanced Snow Plowing and Street Sweeping a. Curbs act as guides for snowplows and sweepers, improving efficiency and reducing the chance of plowing into lawns. 3. Defined Roadway Edges a. Improves uniformity of the road and helps maintain clear boundaries between the road and lawns. 4. Stormwater Management a. Curbs and gutters help collect and direct runoff efficiently to storm sewers or catch basins, reducing erosion and standing water on lawns. Bicycles A few notes: 1. It’s not recommended that bicycles use the gutter next to the curb. 2. There is no history of bicycle vs. curb accidents. 3. We aren’t recommending formal bicycle lanes in this neighborhood. 4. Like any other street without sidewalk, path or bike lane, bicycles should share the road with vehicles. Roadway narrowing is a traffic calming strategy to help reduce speeds for increased safety for all types of roadway users. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Brandon Freeman <BFreeman@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2025 7:50 AM Page 430 of 668 Page 431 of 668 68 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, July 10, 2025 4:06 PM To:'McCambridge, Cam'; Paul Gans; Ellen Hunter Gans Subject:RE: Public Works - Weston Cir Road Reconstruction Attachments:20190911 Open House Postcard.docx; Mailing List.pdf See attached Cam from 2019. This project has been in and out of the reconstruction queue over the years. I can’t seem to locate any more recent mailings at this time. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: McCambridge, Cam Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 1:41 PM To: Paul Gans Ellen Hunter Gans Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Public Works - Weston Cir Road Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron, can you send us any and all communication regarding this construction that was sent to the homeowners and a timeline for when they were sent if possible? Thanks! Cam McCambridge Edina Realty From: Paul Gans Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:59 AM To: McCambridge, Cam ; Ellen Hunter Gans Subject: Fwd: Public Works - Weston Cir Road Reconstruction [EXTERNAL] ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> Page 432 of 668 69 Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 4:00 PM Subject: Public Works - Weston Cir Road Reconstruction To: Paul, It was nice speaking with you today. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Paul Gans Sent: Monday, July 7, 2025 12:28 PM To: Edina Mail <mail@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Public Works - Weston Cir Road Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, My name is Paul Gans. We just moved into 7016 Weston Cir and received the postcard about the reconstruction survey. Some of the neighbors let us know that there was a worksheet/estimator that was sent out prior to our arrival. Would it be possible to get a copy of that so that we can plan accordingly? Page 433 of 668 70 Thank you so much for your help! Paul -- Paul Gans -- Paul Gans CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ALERT! Edina Realty will never send you wiring information via email or request that you send us personal financial information by email. If you receive an email message like this concerning any transaction involving Edina Realty, do not respond to the email and immediately contact your agent via phone. Page 434 of 668 72 From:Katharine Nelson Sent:Tuesday, July 1, 2025 7:57 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Prospect knolls roadway construction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks Aaron! It’s a good opportunity and I’m sure people will be taking about it. Let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks so much! Katharine Nelson > On Jul 1, 2025, at 2:54 PM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: > > Katharine, > > Thank you for the invitaƟon. I'll see if we can accommodate. > > Aaron > > Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer > 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 > 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 > ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Katharine Nelson > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 7:03 PM > To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> > Subject: Prospect knolls roadway construcƟon > > EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hi Aaron, > > I wanted to invite you to the Prospect Knolls nite to unite party on 8/5. Neighbors come together from 6-8p on Tralee Drive. It would be a great opportunity to have you or someone come talk about the upcoming work. If you have any signage or fliers, I would be happy to set them out. > > Thanks!! > Page 435 of 668 76 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, June 30, 2025 8:11 AM To:'Roger T' Subject:RE: Sewer Replacement Attachments:Utility Upgrade Letter Presidents.pdf Roger, See attached letter for our current reconstruction project which includes the contractor list. We typically mail this out in January after City Council formally authorizes the design phase of the project. We do not recommend any private sewer / water upgrades that impact the roadway until 2026. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Roger T Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 3:47 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Sewer Replacement EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I received the survey for the Prospect Knolls roadway project. Where can I find the list of contractors that replace sewer lines? Thanks Roger Thomas 7109 Antrim Court Page 436 of 668 77 From:Jenna Tauchen Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 3:01 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Road construction inquiry EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Aaron! This is indeed where I live. I’ll look out for that postcard. Best, Jenna On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:42 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Jenna, Thank you for reaching out. Assuming you live in the attached area, your neighborhood is scheduled for roadway reconstruction in 2026. You should receive a postcard very soon with a link to the project webpage and a questionnaire. Construction will include:  Complete reconstruction of the roadway asphalt pavement,  Installation or replacement (likely) of concrete curb and gutter,  Replacement of a portion of the watermain and water services,  Improvements to the sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems, and  The project is funded by a combination of special assessments, property taxes, respective utility funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Technically home sellers aren’t required by law to disclose anything until after the public hearing, scheduled for December 2025, when the proposed assessment becomes pending to property owners. Sorry for the confusion, our surveyor had good intentions but misspoke. Aaron Page 437 of 668 78 Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Jenna Tauchen Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:52 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Road construction inquiry EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Aaron, I hope you’re doing well! I recently bought a house in Edina and moved in last week, and I just talked with someone from your team who was surveying in my yard. He mentioned the upcoming construction that will take place on my road and asked if the sellers of my house mentioned this at closing, and they hadn’t. He gave me your card and suggested I email you to see if/when the sellers would have been notified of this construction. I’m also curious to know the extent of the construction if you could share any details about that? Thanks so much! Best, Jenna Tauchen Page 438 of 668 79 From:Kimberly Kritzer Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 8:56 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Street Project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you! I will share with our townhome board in case anyone is asking. Kim > On Jun 24, 2025, at 3:53 PM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: > > Kim, > > Village Drive is scheduled for roadway reconstrucƟon in 2026. You should receive a postcard very soon with a link to the project webpage and a quesƟonnaire. > > Thank you. > > Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer > 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 > 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 > ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kimberly Kritzer > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:45 PM > To: Edina Mail <mail@EdinaMN.gov> > Subject: Street Project > > EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hello, > > About 3 years ago I spoke to one of the engineers who said Village Dr. would be redone completely with curbs. > > We have extensive pot holes every year that get patched but of course that does not last long. > > Was this project delayed due to other pressing issues and any Ɵmeline for when it's on the books again? > > Thanks for your Ɵme! > > Kim Kritzer Page 439 of 668 82 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 3:17 PM To:Dave Goergen Subject:RE: 7005 Weston Cir - Survey Stake? I called Molly. It’s a survey control point for 2026 recon. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Dave Goergen <dgoergen@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 1:42 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 7005 Weston Cir - Survey Stake? Hi Aaron, Resident Molly Sikora, , called asking about a wooden stake with pink marks that was placed in their yard last week. Says they are the only property on the block with a stake, wondering what it is for. Something Engineering did? Thanks, Dave Dave Goergen, Public Works Assistant Director 952-826-0312 | Fax 952-826-0392 | Cell 952-292-6225 dgoergen@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Page 440 of 668 83 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 8:54 AM To: Subject:Undergrounding of Xcel Energy Infrastructure Process Rhonda, Following up on our conversation about the utility poles. Xcel Energy said they would NOT do only a portion of the neighborhood underground work, it would be ALL or NOTHING. Xcel Energy said they could provide a “very very rough” cost estimate if you prefer. Here is a summary of my conversation with Xcel Energy staƯ. “Considerations can be vastly diƯerent based on terrain, existing infrastructure, necessity of procuring new easements, required carrying capacity of infrastructure, etc. so there isn’t a good way to estimate general costs or information. The costs for conversion of overhead spans of wire to underground average around $8,000 to 10,000 per span for single phase primary, and closer to $15,000 per span for three phase primary. This is before we consider the conversion costs of infrastructure such as transformers, switchgear, etc., and also excludes conversion of individual residential services if they are overhead. Customers converting overhead services to underground more often than not have to work with a private electrician to verify that their meter socket is up to the current spec (socket has a lever bypass), and convert to a lever bypass meter socket if theirs is not up to spec. Additionally, the customers would have to coordinate with the respective communications companies on the poles to convert their existing infrastructure from overhead to underground. These would be ADDITIONAL costs above and beyond the Xcel Energy costs. I’m not sure what the costs would be from a telecom perspective, but it’s something that should also be considered. For neighborhood scale design projects, Xcel generally would request a retainer fee for the required design time, would be at least $10k. This retainer would go towards the overall cost of the project if customers decide to proceed with the project, but would be held if the customers opt to not move forward after the calculation of the final project cost. “ Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 441 of 668 84 From:rhonda bland Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 7:05 AM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: 2026 - Prospect Knolls Roadway Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Aaron. I also appreciate your coming to meet with me and your following up with my concerns. Rhonda Bland > On Jun 4, 2025, at 5:30 PM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > > Rhonda, > > AƩached are the following files: > > 1. The public hearing slide as we discussed, which is DRAFT. We'll run some vehicle turning movements and review your concern at the bumpout adjacent to your property with the Traffic Safety CommiƩee. > 2. Mapping showing uƟliƟes. Your water service is labeled in the map. Your sanitary sewer service is not shown. I presume it connects in a similar locaƟon to your water service. > > I'll reach out to Xcel Energy about power transiƟon from overhead to underground at the cost of the property owners and the City Forester about the coƩonwood tree as we discussed on 6/4. > > Thank you. > > Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer > 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 > 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 > ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rhonda bland > Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 11:45 AM > To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> > Subject: Rhonda Bland > > EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > Page 442 of 668 86 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, May 29, 2025 8:38 AM To:'Jeff Gisselbeck' Subject:RE: Road reconstruction Attachments:Driveway Apron & Reimbursement Exhibit.pdf Jeff, It’s a great idea, and we appreciate you asking. AestheƟcally, replacing your driveway with the project will provide a more seamless and consistent appearance. See the aƩached example exhibit and the following notes. 1. We recommend geƫng at least two quotes. 2. Have an agreement with a private contractor and let the City know about your private driveway before the City’s contractor installs the concrete apron. 3. The City will prepare a leƩer showing the reimbursement amount for the green area shown in the exhibit. Share this leƩer, including the amount, with your private contractor. 4. Your contractor will be responsible for removing your private driveway shown in the blue area. 5. Your contractor will install your new driveway in both the blue and green areas. 6. Your private contractor should email the City an invoice for the amount shown in the green area that matches the amount referenced in note 3 above. 7. The City will reimburse your contractor for the amount shown in the green area. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Gisselbeck Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 11:30 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Road reconstrucƟon EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Aaron, I was considering puƫng in a new cement driveway. I would like to do it about the same Ɵme the street is under repair. Good or bad idea? I know the more expensive parts of the driveway is the curb and apron at the end of the driveway. This part will be replaced by the road reconstrucƟon project correct. Do you have any advice and or thoughts. How much of the driveway will the city take? Also the sidewalk will also need to be figured in the plan. Thanks Jeff > On Apr 14, 2025, at 10:00 AM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > Page 443 of 668 87 > Jeff, > > Yes, roadway reconstrucƟon is scheduled for 2026 in your neighborhood, including Lanham Ln. > > A sidewalk is part of the pedestrian master plan and is proposed to occur with street reconstrucƟon as shown in the aƩachment. Which side is undetermined. However, there would be one fewer roadway crossing if the walk is on the west side, so we will likely start are evaluaƟon on the west side. The final determinaƟon will likely be made by fall 2025. > > The standard street width is 24-lf wide when sidewalks are installed. See aƩached for reference. > > Thank you. > > Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer > 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 > 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 > ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff gisselbeck > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 10:24 AM > To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> > Subject: Road reconstrucƟon > > EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hello Aaron, I live at 7008 LANHAM LN. are we sƟll on for road improvements for 2026 and is there a plan of what type of street will be built. Sidewalk ? Which side of the street? And when will that be determined Thanks Jeff > <Prospect Knolls Sidewalk.pdf><Living_Streets_Typical_SecƟon.pdf> Page 444 of 668 88 From:Jeff Gisselbeck Sent:Friday, May 23, 2025 10:54 AM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Road reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for the info. On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 4:31 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Jeff, The pedestrian and bicycle master plan was prepared with public input and a public hearing prior to formal publishing in 2016. https://www.edinamn.gov/490/Biking- Walking#:~:text=Pedestrian%20%26%20Bicycle%20Master%20Plan,lanes%2C%20shared%20lanes%20and%2 0sidewalks. Historically we don’t prepare a questionnaire / survey for sidewalks that are already in the master plan. There will be ways to voice your opinion on sidewalks during the study phase of the project but the primary two will be at the December 2025 Public Hearing and / or a petition. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Page 445 of 668 89 Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Jeff Gisselbeck Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 11:44 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Road reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks Aaron, Do the neighbors have any input if they wanted a sidewalk or not? did the city send out a survey ? Thanks On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:01 AM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Jeff, Yes, roadway reconstruction is scheduled for 2026 in your neighborhood, including Lanham Ln. A sidewalk is part of the pedestrian master plan and is proposed to occur with street reconstruction as shown in the attachment. Which side is undetermined. However, there would be one fewer roadway crossing if the walk is on the west side, so we will likely start are evaluation on the west side. The final determination will likely be made by fall 2025. The standard street width is 24-lf wide when sidewalks are installed. See attached for reference. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Jeff gisselbeck Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 10:24 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Road reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 446 of 668 90 Hello Aaron, I live at 7008 LANHAM LN. are we still on for road improvements for 2026 and is there a plan of what type of street will be built. Sidewalk ? Which side of the street? And when will that be determined Thanks Jeff Page 447 of 668 91 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1:59 PM To:'John Lohmann' Subject:RE: 7101 Tralee Dr Attachments:Living Streets.jpg John, Yes. See the aƩached standard roadway secƟon. 27' wide, no sidewalk, parking on both sides. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: John Lohmann Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 10:36 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: 7101 Tralee Dr EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks Aaron Does the city plan to shrink the width of the streets on this project? John Lohmann > On Apr 28, 2025, at 12:49 PM, Aaron Ditzler <aditzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: > > John, > > We'll prepare a formal esƟmated assessment range later this summer. My "unofficial and too early" esƟmated range $18,000 - $24,000 per lot. > > Thank you. > > Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer > 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 > 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 > ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Page 448 of 668 92 > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Lohmann > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 7:35 AM > To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> > Subject: 7101 Tralee Dr > > EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hello Aaron, My wife and I are considering buying my parents house at 7101 Tralee Dr which is in the neighborhood to be reconstructed in 2026. Do you have any Idea what the assessment is going to be on that property? > Thank you > > John M Lohmann > J > > Page 449 of 668 93 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Tuesday, May 6, 2025 8:20 AM To:'Sjlenhardt' Subject:RE: Street reconstruction Sarah, I would suggest 12-lf from the curb to be conservaƟve. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Sjlenhardt Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 3:43 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Street reconstrucƟon EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for the info. I assume anything more than 10 feet neck from the curb should be (generally) unaffected? Sarah > On May 5, 2025, at 2:01 PM, Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: > > Sarah, > > Roadway reconstrucƟon will not be final unƟl the Public Hearing in December 2025. > > You will have two opƟons for your landscaping. > > - Do nothing and the City will replace impacted planƟngs with the project at the conclusion of construcƟon at no addiƟonal cost to you. > - Move the plants back 10 feet from their exisƟng locaƟon yourself to avoid damage by construcƟon. > > For reference, there is a sidewalk proposed between Dewey Hill Road and West 70th Street, including on a porƟon of Kemrich Dr. Which side is undetermined currently. > > Thank you. > > Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer > 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 > 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 > ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov > > -----Original Message----- Page 450 of 668 94 > From: Sarah Lenhardt > Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2025 10:18 AM > To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov>; Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> > Subject: Street reconstrucƟon > > EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hello- > > We live in prospect knolls neighborhood - 5804 Kemrich drive. It appears we are slated for street reconstrucƟon next year. > > I am wondering if this is officially decided or subject to adjustment (unsure when final decisions for next year project are made)? > > We have a large garden in our front yard nearish the street. What is the setback for the street reconstrucƟon? We suspect we will need to start moving plants/garden so it is not destroyed during the project. We will likely start this process this summer so we have the move fully completed before the project starts next spring. Any details or decision Ɵmeline you could provide would be helpful. > > Thank you, > Sarah Lenhardt Page 451 of 668 95 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Wednesday, July 24, 2024 1:01 PM To:Karin Stone Subject:RE: Questions on Edina Future Street Reconstruction Projects Karin, Responses to your three questions. 1. The project is scheduled for 2026, including formal City Council approval in December 2025. Barring something unforeseen, the project is locked in. 2. The duration would be minimum 4 weeks, maximum 10 weeks, contingent on utility improvements. We haven’t done any utility investigation yet. 3. Every property that has sole access from Village Drive will be assessed for the roadway work, whether they are directly on Village Drive or not. Payments for special assessments won’t be due until October 2027. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Karin Stone Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 7:24 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Questions on Edina Future Street Reconstruction Projects EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Morning Aaron, Based on the updated maps and an inquiry from Paul Nelson (son-in-law of one of our owners) to you, looks like Village Drive has been moved up to 2026. That’s great news. We are working on a major front project that includes waterproofing this year, and then new parking lot, drainage and sidewalks in 2025 or 2026. When we embarked on the project, we had 2029 or 2030 as the timing for the street so we didn’t need to think about street access or an additional City assessment layered on top of special assessments we will need to do. So, I have a couple of questions: 1. When would schedule/timing be confirmed? I suspect early 2026? 2. For a project like Village Drive, how long would the actual work take? 3. How will the assessment for the street work given we are a condo building and there are also 36(?) townhomes which use Village Drive for access as well? I’m trying to get an order of magnitude plus timing for individual assessments so we know if we will be able to add anything more on top of it or have to delay our projects. Page 452 of 668 96 I’m happy to have a quick call if that is easier than email. And if someone else is best to answer these questions, please let me know. Thanks, Karin Stone From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 3:42 PM To: Karin Stone Subject: RE: Questions on Edina Future Street Reconstruction Projects Karin, Reconstruction of Village Drive, along with the streets in the attached map, has been postponed to 2029 or 2030, roughly. I’ll pass along to Public Works to review the pavement condition and patch as necessary. Unfortunately, an overlay between now and 2029/2030 is not planned as that could hinder the City’s ability to levy special assessments. Otherwise, a petition signed by property owners in the attached project area can be submitted for street reconstruction to potentially occur sooner. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Karin Stone Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2023 1:57 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Questions on Edina Future Street Reconstruction Projects EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Adam – In preparation for our HOA Annual Meeting on June 15, I went out to the Edina website to look for updates to the reconstruction plans for Village Drive. At one point, the street was slated for 2022 (see the September 26, 2019 presentation). When we looked at the schedule last year, not only was the street not on the list for 2022, it had fallen off the entire five year schedule. Village Drive is still not on the five year chart dated March 2023. The road is a bit like a lunar landing. Hard to see how it has even six years of life left in it. I know there will be questions at the meeting regarding plans for the street and what we can do to get Village Drive back on the schedule. What can you tell me that I can share with my fellow owners? Page 453 of 668 98 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Friday, June 14, 2024 10:24 AM To:Paul Nelson Subject:RE: Village Drive replacing Paul, Thanks for reaching out. I hope you’re doing well. We typically lock in projects in the next 2 years so barring a major unforeseen change Village Drive will be reconstructed in 2026. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Paul Nelson Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 7:30 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Village Drive replacing EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Aaron, We worked together at SEH a few years back. I'm wondering when Village Drive (off Cahill) will be replaced or mill & overlay? It's in pretty tough shape and the map suggests it will be done in 2026. Thank you. Paul Nelson | Director of Business Development Improving People’s Lives by Building Better Communities Donlar Construction is an AA M/F/Vet/Disability Equal Opportunity Employer Page 454 of 668 99 From:Edina Mail Sent:Monday, November 27, 2023 8:25 AM To:Andrew Scipioni; Nick Bauler Subject:FW: Prospect Knolls Street Reconstruction Good morning, Who can assist?? Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389 lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Roger T Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 6:01 AM To: Edina Mail <mail@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls Street Reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Sir or Madam: I live at 7109 Antrim Court and I was reviewing the Prospect Knolls Reconstruction Project and had a concern. I am glad that the roads are going to get repaired but I did not see a plan to add a sidewalk to Antrim Road. My oldest child goes to Valley View Middle School and is required to walk to school. She has to walk on Antrim road to get to school and this road is narrow, curved and has a lot of trees reducing visibility. Further there is a lot of traffic that uses this road for commuting and they drive fast leading to a dangerous area for children in my opinion. I feel like a sidewalk should be added to this road since children use it to walk to school. My children also do not have a good safe option to get a sidewalk on bikes that avoids that road if they want to ride to Cahill road or a friends house. I have included a map below with the area of concern in yellow. Sincerely: Roger Thomas Page 455 of 668 100 Page 456 of 668 101 From:Chad Millner Sent:Tuesday, July 25, 2023 3:01 PM To:Terri Rovick Subject:RE: Down Road update Terri, Thanks for the email. Great quesƟons. The street reconstrucƟon project is tentaƟvely scheduled for 2026. We do not have updated cost esƟmates at this Ɵme. We would have those in summer / fall 2025. The council did change the assessment policy so there should be a significant change in the assessments from the original calculaƟon vs what you will see in 2025. Thanks for the interest in the project, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. -----Original Message----- From: Terri Rovick Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 1:16 PM To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Down Road update EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Chad, I am an AZ residence but sƟll do own my home on Down Road in Edina. A few years ago I aƩended the meeƟng regarding the upgrade to add curb, guƩer and sidewalks to our area. I know it got postponed because of the expense. I am here for the summer/fall and wanƟng to hear about the lates test Ɵmeline and pricing. I know it was based on LOT size before. Is this sƟll the case, and what do you ESTIMATE my lot would be? Hope you can help me out and answer some of these quesƟons. You were at my house a few years ago looking at a storm sewer we have in our back yard. You might remember. Long driveway off of Down Road. Thanks for your Ɵme. Terri and David Rovick 7100 Down Road Page 457 of 668 103 From:Liz Moore Sent:Friday, September 16, 2022 2:26 PM To:eitan medini Subject:FW: Fleetwood Dr Edina MN Good AŌernoon, See below. This was my previous response to your email earlier this week. Thanks, Liz Moore City of Edina Engineering -----Original Message----- From: Liz Moore Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 1:20 PM To: eitan medini Subject: RE: Fleetwood Dr Edina MN Good AŌernoon, 1. This project has been canceled and is no longer occurring in the next 5 years due to high assessment esƟmates. We have established a new assessment policy as a result of the costs. The new policy can be found here: hƩps://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11369/Assessment-Policy-Dated-July-21-2021 2. There will be a sidewalk on Fleetwood but it has not been determined which side of the street the sidewalk will be on. It usually depends on which side has less impacts to exisƟng infrastructure. If you have addiƟonal quesƟons, please reach out to Assistant City Engineer, Aaron Ditzler, at 952-826-0443. Thank you, Liz Moore City of Edina Engineering -----Original Message----- From: eitan medini Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2022 1:03 PM To: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Fleetwood Dr Edina MN EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 458 of 668 104 LMoor I live in Fleetwood Dr Edina MN 55439 Please let me know here as a reply: 1. when the street project reconstrucƟon Will be done in my street ? 2. Will this include sidewalk, cuƫng front yard and what side? Thanks Eitan Medini Sent from my iPad Page 459 of 668 105 From:Ryan Danielsen Sent:Wednesday, August 17, 2022 5:17 PM To:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Online Form Submittal: Contact Us EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for the clarification Aaron! On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 4:25 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Ryan, Thanks for your question. Here are the two options for removal of the asphalt pad: 1. Wait until street reconstruction occurs. The City won’t remove it earlier. 2. Property owner removes the asphalt pad at your expense. No City permit is needed if the concrete curb remains in place. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 6:59 AM Page 460 of 668 106 To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Contact Us Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Ryan Danielsen Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 6:35 PM To: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Online Form Submittal: Contact Us EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks for the quick response Liz! Is there any chance that schedule could be moved up. Could I have it removed myself? -Ryan On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 3:31 PM Liz Moore <LMoore@edinamn.gov> wrote: Hi, Ryan! Your street is scheduled for reconstruction in 2026 and that asphalt pad will be removed as part of that work. Please let us know if you have additional questions. Page 461 of 668 Page 462 of 668 108 Zip Code 55439 Phone Number Fax Number Field not completed. How did you find us? Google Message Hi, We moved into our house last August. There is an asphalt turn around pad in the corner of our lot. My neighbor said that it was put in when our house was the last on the cul-de-sac and that the city would be removing it now that there is a turn around loop at the end of the extended cul-de-sac. Who can I talk to about this to find out if this is going to be removed, etc.? Thanks, Ryan Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Page 463 of 668 109 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Tuesday, July 19, 2022 11:00 AM To:Jimmy Sioris Subject:RE: Lanham Ln Jimmy, The street reconstruction is now NOT scheduled to occur in the next 5 years. The sidewalk is still part of the pedestrian master plan and is proposed to occur with street reconstruction. Which side is undetermined. However, there would be one fewer roadway crossing if the walk is on the west side, so we will likely start are evaluation on the west side. Currently the City repairs irrigation systems at no additional cost to residents. Unless the City Council changes this in the future you could purchase irrigation and it would be repaired during the project. See the revised assessment policy. As referenced on PDF page 6 of the link below, the assessments are being reduced every year by 5%. For example, a project in 2027 would get a 52.66% reduction of the assessment. https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11369/Assessment-Policy-Dated-July-21-2021 Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Jimmy Sioris Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 7:05 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Lanham Ln EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hey Aaron, I hope this finds you well. We were slated to have a new sidewalk installed and our street reconstructed in 2023. I went to a seminar probably two years ago. I went on the website and it appears we are now slated for 2026. Is this correct? Are we still getting a sidewalk and do we know what side of the street it is on? I’m all for all of it. I just need to know when. I want to install a sprinkler system and was instructed not to until the Page 464 of 668 Page 465 of 668 111 From:Terri Rovick Sent:Tuesday, June 7, 2022 10:12 AM To:Chad Millner Subject:Re: Down Road sign EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. . Cell > On Jun 7, 2022, at 9:08 AM, Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > > Please provide a phone # so we can discuss. Probably easier with a call then email. Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jun 7, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Terri Rovick wrote: >> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> >> Chad, >> >> I have been gone so out to touch with the Down Road resurfacing project. I cant imagine that Down Road can last to 2026!!! It is in such poor shape. What did the city decide as far as the assessment, or is there somewhere I can read about this and see the schedule? Is it sƟll based on LOT size? >> >> Hope you can help to answer some of my quesƟons. >> >> Terri Rovick >> 7100 Down Road, Edina, MN 55439 >> >>> On Jun 1, 2022, at 6:47 AM, Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the note. Nick will review the street sign issue and find the appropriate person to address it. >>> >>> We just completed the capital improvement plan. Your neighborhood is schedule for street reconstrucƟon in 2026. If you would like to discuss this in more detail, please give me a call. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chad >>> >>> >>> Chad Millner, Director of Engineering >>> 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 >>> 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 Page 466 of 668 112 >>> cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov >>> Stay informed about the City's response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BeƩerTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. >>> >>> Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BeƩerTogetherEdina.org. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Terri Rovick >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 9:06 PM >>> To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> >>> Cc: Mario Bradley >>> Subject: Down Road sign >>> >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> >>> Chad, >>> >>> Not sure your one to speak with about this, but hopefully you can help us out and/or forward to the correct person if necessary. >>> >>> My neighbor, Mario Bradley and I live on Down Road. At the boƩom of our hill, Down Road there is a green street sign and a big yellow arrow poinƟng out the sharp curve. The vegetaƟon is very overgrown around it, and not sure if this is the city or Marios property and responsibility, to clean it up so that the signs are visible? >>> >>> Also, what’s the latest on the street improvements for our street? I've been gone all winter and not heard any updates. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Terri Rovick >>> 7100 Down Road >>> Edian, MN. 55439 >>> >>> Mario Bradley >>> 7104 Down Road, >>> Edina, MN. 55439 >>> >>> >> Page 467 of 668 113 From:Andrew Scipioni Sent:Tuesday, April 12, 2022 10:43 AM To:John Elliott Cc:Aaron Ditzler Subject:RE: survey Attachments:Living Streets Plan (PDF).pdf; BA-458 PROSPECT KNOLLS ENG STUDY.pdf John, Thank you for your feedback on the survey. The decision on whether or not to narrow a street depends first on the condition of existing curb (if present) and the extent of underground utility work proposed. If the no curb is present or staff determines that the majority of the curb will be impacted by utility work, then staff recommends rebuilding the street per the design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan (attached). For most local streets, this means a 27-foot section (measured between the faces of the curb) with parking permitted on both sides. Secondly, the decision depends on the existing roadway conditions (primarily, width and available right-of-way). Reviewing the engineering study for Prospect Knolls A (the project that was proposed in 2019 but was rejected by Council), Table 1 on page 16 shows the existing and proposed widths for all the streets within the project area. Two-sided parked was recommended to remain on every street except for Kerry Road, which is too narrow to safely accommodate it. The City’s current practice is to install the auxiliary storm sewer lines (or sump draintile) where feasibility in reconstruction projects. This utility has valuable for properties that currently have sump drains discharging into the right-of-way as well as for future redeveloped properties that may want to address localized flooding. The City standard for new curb and gutter is the insurmountable style, that is correct. This style is preferred by Public Works and Engineering for its advantages to snow plowing operations and stormwater management. In some areas of the project where the majority of the existing surmountable curb is in good condition and unlikely to be impacted (Antrim Court, Antrim Terrace, Dublin Circle, and parts of Shannon Drive), it was proposed to remain. The work you saw in Parkwood Knolls was most likely one of our scheduled overlays, which is a different type of pavement maintenance strategy than full reconstruction. With an overlay, only the condition of the pavement is addressed along with minor adjustments to existing curbing. When these streets come due for full reconstruction, staff will propose insurmountable curbs in areas without as we have done in the past. For example, Parkwood Road, Idylwood Road, and Knoll Drive between Schaefer Road and Blake Road were reconstructed in 2010 with insurmountable curb. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: John Elliott Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 2:01 PM To: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: survey EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Page 468 of 668 114 Hi Andrew: I’m concerned that the questionnaire skirts the issues of what may really happen, or is using a backward question, rather than being straight. No where does it ask a response to narrowing the street 3’, only if the intersections are too wide. It doesn’t ask about how we would feel if parking is only allowed on one side, which may occur if the street is narrowed. There are no questions about anyone wanting to hook up to an auxiliary storm sewer line. The surveyor said he only saw 2 lines, I think he missed another 2, but still that hardly makes it worth 3.2 miles of pipe, trenching, disturbance, and future maintenance. And, when I was at the meeting, it was stated that the curbing had to be insurmountable concrete, the new Edina standard, which makes biking harder. Oddly, a couple of weeks later I’m in NW Edina, and they are repaving Parkwood. So how come it has surmountable asphalt curbing or less? Can you explain why this is? Thanks, John Elliott, Prospect Knolls resident of 71 years. From: Andrew Scipioni [mailto:ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 3:44 PM To: john elliott Subject: RE: survey John, Attached are the questions that were asked of property owners in the Prospect Knolls neighborhood in 2019. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: john elliott Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 12:19 PM To: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: survey EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Andrew: Would you please send me a copy of the survey that was sent out a couple of years ago to the home owners regarding the Prospect Knolls road project? Thanks, John Elliott Page 469 of 668 116 From:Evan Acosta Sent:Tuesday, August 31, 2021 7:06 AM To:Zuleyka Marquez Subject:Resident Question on Lanham Lane Zuly, Can you call John Bergstrom at ? He lives on Lanham Lane and was inquiring about Private utility work in the area. I am unfamiliar with this part of town! Thanks, Evan Acosta, Graduate Engineer 952-826-0448 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 EAcosta@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 470 of 668 117 From:Andrew Scipioni Sent:Monday, August 16, 2021 2:04 PM To:Carolyn Jackson Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:RE: calendar of street reconstruction Councilmember Jackson, Generally, April at the earliest. The schedule is usually most dependent on the weather, as contractors can’t haul in large pieces of equipment until spring load restrictions are lifted. Large neighborhood projects are usually split into smaller phases, which can delay start of construction for some areas until June or July. At this time, we don’t know how future projects would be phased. Thanks, Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Carolyn Jackson <CJackson@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 8:52 AM To: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: calendar of street reconstruction Hi Andrew, A resident who lives south of 70th and west of Cahill asked me when next year the street reconstruction of his neighborhood will begin. He is going to sell his house and would like to get it on the market before reconstruction begins. Do projects generally begin in April? May? Thank you! --Carolyn Page 471 of 668 118 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Tuesday, May 25, 2021 1:31 PM To:Patty Oberstar Subject:RE: two questions Attachments:Prospect Knolls CD Project Area.pdf Patty, See attached map for streets included in the project area. Yes, there is a sidewalk proposed between Dewey Hill Road and West 70th Street, including on a portion of Lanham Lane. Generally we review the following for determining sidewalk side.  Presence of existing walk. Match current side if possible.  Presence of amenities. Match current side if possible.  Avoid roadway crossings if possible.  Review potential conflicts with infrastructure o Utility poles o Walls o Trees Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Patty Oberstar Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 11:00 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: two questions EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Adam, I am on the Better Together Edina website and see a proposed new sidewalk for what looks like Lanham Lane off West 70th. Am I reading this map correctly and if so can you speak to how you determine what side of the street the sidewalk will be on? Also, the anticipated roadway reconstruction map doesn't include street names. Do you have a list of the streets that will be impacted in the Prospect Knolls neighborhood? Thank you, Page 472 of 668 120 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Thursday, April 22, 2021 11:13 AM To: Subject:RE: A new question has been added to Q&A Attachments:Prospect Knolls CD Project Area.pdf Thanks for your question. See the attached project map showing the map for Prospect Knolls C &D, which includes Village Drive. Improvement limits are highlighted in yellow. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Better Together Edina <notifications@engagementhq.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:36 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov>; Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: A new question has been added to Q&A EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi there, Just a quick heads up to let you know that a new question has been asked at 2022 and Future Street Reconstruction Projects by tamie. The question that was asked is: I received a notice about road construction on Village Drive. I don't see it on your website. Can you advise? Please DO NOT reply to this email. If you want to provide an answer to this question, sign into your site and respond to the question from within the Q & A tool. Regards Bang The Table Team Page 473 of 668 121 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:44 PM To:LJ T Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls future roadway reconstruction Attachments:Prospect Knolls CD Project Area.pdf Laurie, Plans will be prepare the winter prior to construction, scheduled for summer 2023. The attached map displays the project area. The only street that will be reconstructed in your association by the City is Village Drive as shown in yellow. Please reach out if you have any other questions. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: LJ T Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 2:21 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls future roadway reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I received notice of a future roadway construction affecting my property at 5561 W. 70th Street. I did go on the website, but could not see what the specific plans are for the reconstruction. Is there a general idea of what the plans are? One of the pdfs states that it would be in 2022 and another one states 2023, so not quite sure of the year. I just purchased the townhome last year and have noticed that the driveway is not wide enough for two cars and was hoping that I could widen it a bit in the future, but there are curbs on both sides of the driveway. I may want to address that at the same time of the reconstruction. I would assume that I would need the homeowners association approval as well before I could do that. I would appreciate any information that you have regarding our small street. Thank you! Laurie Thro 5561 W. 70th Street Edina, MN 55439 Page 474 of 668 123 From:Aaron Ditzler Sent:Monday, April 5, 2021 10:36 AM To:R&M Carlson Subject:RE: Prospect Knolls A road reconstruction Richard and Mari, The short answer is it’s on hold until the assessment amounts are more favorable to the City Council. The resident task force recommended some changes to the Assessment Policy. City Council hasn’t formally acted on the changes however. I’ve copied and pasted an update from the Better Together Edina website below. “While Council supported a small change to the assessment policy for 2021 projects, a permanent decision on street funding is required this summer. Council directed staff to bring back more information to continue the discussion. Staff are reviewing schedules to determine when that discussion can continue. “ https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/street-funding-task-force Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: R&M Carlson Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 6:57 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Prospect Knolls A road reconstruction EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning Aaron, We are wondering- what is happening with respect to our neighborhood's road reconstruction project. It was supposed to have taken place in 2020 but was tabled. Now, it does not show up as an anticipated project for any upcoming year 2021-26. Many thanks. Richard and Mari Carlson 7020 Kerry Road Page 475 of 668 124 From:Chad Millner Sent:Wednesday, March 10, 2021 10:59 AM To: Subject:RE: map of Prospect Knolls Street project Attachments:Prospect Knolls A Project Area.pdf Here you go. By the way, we have no plans to reconstruction these streets at this point until a decision is made on how to fund streets by the council. Even if they make a decisions in the next few months, it would be at least 2-3 or more years out and we would reengage the neighborhood. Thanks Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 10:47 AM To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: map of Prospect Knolls Street project EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Chad, Could you email me either the old map, from 2019, or just the street boundaries of the Prospect Knolls street reconstruction project? Thanks, Hamid Page 476 of 668 125 From:Liz Moore Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:25 AM To:Janis Green Subject:RE: Shannon Drive Good Morning Janis, It is not a problem. I forwarded your email to Jim. Thanks for reaching out and feel free to ask any additional questions you may have. Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Janis Green Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:17 AM To: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Shannon Drive EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Ms Moore, I answered an email from youwhich I thought was a forward to my brother, Jim Fossey, concerning the Shannon Dr road reconstruction and assessment. I thought I was responding to my brother about your response. I appreciate your prompt and knowledgeable response. Please disregard any negative thoughts I may have brought forward. We are in a difficult situation after the death of our mother regarding her house and thoughts of a road assessment factor into that. Living in South Dakota for 32 years this road assessment to the home owner is new to us. Thank you for your information, Janis Green Page 477 of 668 126 From:Janis Green Sent:Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:10 AM To:Liz Moore Subject:Re: 5824 Dewey Hill Road, Edina, MN 55439 EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. thanks, jim, for checking into this.....interesting how they can wait until winter 2021 to give the assessment cost.....glad they are at least waiting until 2022 for construction and that mom's house will only be assessed .5 for the project...... janis -----Original Message----- From: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> To: Jim Fossey Cc: TOM FOSSEY Sent: Tue, Mar 10, 2020 8:12 am Subject: RE: 5824 Dewey Hill Road, Edina, MN 55439 Good Morning Jim, Thank you for your email and voice message. This property will be impacted by the 2022 Prospect Knolls Neighborhood Reconstruction. This section of Shannon Drive was originally on the schedule for 2020 reconstruction but was moved to the 2022 project to better coordinate with a sidewalk that will be installed on Shannon. I have included a map of the proposed sidewalk to help you understand. I have also attached a map of the anticipated roadway reconstruction. The assessment cost has not been determined and an estimate will not be available until Winter of 2021. Since this property is on a corner, it will likely be assessed .5 Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) and when Dewey Hill is reconstructed, it will be assessed the other .5 REU to total 1 REU. Dewey Hill is not currently scheduled for reconstruction. The cities assessment policy is located here and explains how assessments are determined. Here is a link to our website that explains our policy: https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4677/Special-Assessment-Policy?bidId. Let me know if you have additional questions. Thank you, Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Jim Fossey Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 9:10 PM To: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: TOM FOSSEY Subject: 5824 Dewey Hill Road, Edina, MN 55439 Page 478 of 668 127 EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms Moore, As a beneficiary of the Estate of Muryece E. Fossey we would appreciate an update on the project intended for Shannon Dr. I am aware that a number of years ago Shannon was under construction for months as I visited my parents at that time. My brother Thomas A Fossey is the Trustee of the estate and it would be helpful to have the current information or schedule while determining the disposition of the property. I left you a phone message today but felt that an email would be more convenient for you to answer. Any information would be helpful. In one place it is on schedule for 2020 and another 2022. If you could clarify that would be most appreciated -- Jim Fossey Cell Page 479 of 668 APPENDIX K Petition Against Sidewalk Page 480 of 668 Page 481 of 668 Page 482 of 668 Page 483 of 668 Page 484 of 668 APPENDIX L Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 485 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 1 0511621330085 5900 70TH ST W R LAWRENCE PURDY 1 0.5 9,500.00$ 2 0811621220009 5905 70TH ST W KP FREDRIKSEN 1 1 19,000.00$ 3 0511621330097 5912 70TH ST W DUANE E & JULIE M COLOGNE 1 1 19,000.00$ 4 0511621330096 5920 70TH ST W GUILHERME & ELIANA SCHMIDT 1 1 19,000.00$ 5 0811621220044 7101 ANTRIM CT HENRY LANGER 1 1 19,000.00$ 6 0811621210078 7105 ANTRIM CT MICHAEL E TRAEGER 1 1 19,000.00$ 7 0811621210080 7109 ANTRIM CT ROGER S THOMAS & TARA Y THOMAS 1 1 19,000.00$ 8 0811621210081 7115 ANTRIM CT ALLEN L & SHARON G VAN BEEK 1 1 19,000.00$ 9 0811621210082 7119 ANTRIM CT NOEL P RAHN 1 1 19,000.00$ 10 0811621210083 7123 ANTRIM CT BARBARA A PATCH 1 1 19,000.00$ 11 0811621220005 7000 ANTRIM RD DAVID S WICHMANN 1 1 19,000.00$ 12 0811621210053 7001 ANTRIM RD LAVONNE E WILSON 1 0.5 9,500.00$ 13 0811621210054 7005 ANTRIM RD ANNE M E LINVILL SEIDEL 1 1 19,000.00$ 14 0811621220050 7016 ANTRIM RD JUNG KIM REVOCABLE TRUST 1 1 19,000.00$ 15 0811621210086 7017 ANTRIM RD ROBERTA & GREG FAST 1 1 19,000.00$ 16 0811621210087 7021 ANTRIM RD JOEL C HUTCHESON & KELLY S VAN STONE 1 1 19,000.00$ 17 0811621220049 2 ANTRIM TER JEFFREY & ALTHEA OHE 1 1 19,000.00$ 18 0811621220048 4 ANTRIM TER GLENN & KATHERINE HASSE 1 1 19,000.00$ 19 0811621220047 6 ANTRIM TER J BART MULDOWNEY TRUSTEE & NORMA MULDOWNY TRUSTEE 1 1 19,000.00$ 20 0811621220046 8 ANTRIM TER VICTOR YI-CHEN CHENG & YOON-HEE KIM CHA 1 1 19,000.00$ 21 0811621240004 5820 DEWEY HILL RD PATRICK J FIGUEROA & MEGHAN M FIGUEROA 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 22 0811621240005 5824 DEWEY HILL RD MURYECE FOSSEY 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 23 0811621220054 7023 DOWN RD STEPHEN J BARGER 1 1 19,000.00$ 24 0811621220017 7024 DOWN RD MARY ANN ROSENLUND 1 1 19,000.00$ 25 0811621220056 7028 DOWN RD SUZANNE B HEIM TR & STEVEN P HEIM TR 1 1 19,000.00$ 26 0811621220053 7029 DOWN RD MARK A OTNESS & KARIN M WENTZ 1 1 19,000.00$ 27 0811621220057 7100 DOWN RD LAURA LEEDS ROVICK 1 1 19,000.00$ 28 0811621220031 7104 DOWN RD DOROTHY A LILLESTRAND 1 1 19,000.00$ 29 0511621330076 6000 DUBLIN CIR MONICA A RING & TIMOTHY J MCCARTHY 2 1 9,700.00$ 30 0511621330083 6001 DUBLIN CIR TIMOTHY & MELISSA DUFFY 2 1 9,700.00$ 31 0511621330077 6004 DUBLIN CIR JOHN & MARGARET DEVOE 2 1 9,700.00$ Page 1 of 10 Page 486 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 32 0511621330082 6005 DUBLIN CIR DELBERT P TSCHIMPERLE 2 1 9,700.00$ 33 0511621330078 6008 DUBLIN CIR ROBERT M & RUTH A KUREK 2 1 9,700.00$ 34 0511621330081 6009 DUBLIN CIR TERESA M SANDE 2 1 9,700.00$ 35 0511621330094 6012 DUBLIN CIR SHARON & JAMES BURNS 2 1 9,700.00$ 36 0511621330080 6013 DUBLIN CIR D HASHMALL/J CHRISTOPHERSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 37 0811621220027 7000 DUBLIN RD CITY OF EDINA 1 0 -$ 38 0811621220010 7001 DUBLIN RD SALLY JEANNE WOLD 1 1 19,000.00$ 39 0811621220035 7008 DUBLIN RD ROBERT N SHADDUCK & KENT DIXON 1 1 19,000.00$ 40 0811621220008 7009 DUBLIN RD DOROTHY T OLLMANN TRUSTEE 1 1 19,000.00$ 41 0811621220045 7012 DUBLIN RD ROGER W & JUDITH K ANDERSON 1 1 19,000.00$ 42 0811621220051 7013 DUBLIN RD HAMID MOHTADI & FAHIMEH ZARRIN 1 1 19,000.00$ 43 0811621210040 7100 FLEETWOOD DR MICHAEL LORBERBAUM 2 1 9,700.00$ 44 0811621210046 7101 FLEETWOOD DR JOSHUA & MEGAN LINK 2 1 9,700.00$ 45 0811621210041 7104 FLEETWOOD DR NICKOLAS DALBEC & EMILY DALBEC 2 1 9,700.00$ 46 0811621210047 7105 FLEETWOOD DR JOHN UECKER & ANDREA NIEROWIECZ- UECKER 2 1 9,700.00$ 47 0811621210042 7108 FLEETWOOD DR SYDNEY FOWLER JOHNSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 48 0811621210048 7109 FLEETWOOD DR MARY ELIZABETH GEREBI 2 1 9,700.00$ 49 0811621210043 7112 FLEETWOOD DR DIANE E ENGA 2 1 9,700.00$ 50 0811621210049 7113 FLEETWOOD DR BRENT ROTHGEB & LISA ROTHGEB 2 1 9,700.00$ 51 0811621210044 7116 FLEETWOOD DR STEVEN D & JANE G SOLTAU 2 1 9,700.00$ 52 0811621210050 7117 FLEETWOOD DR KEVIN HUSON & CHISTINA HUSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 53 0811621210045 7120 FLEETWOOD DR BRIAN & NICOLE CONSIDINE 2 1 9,700.00$ 54 0811621210051 7121 FLEETWOOD DR EITAN MEDINI & RASHEL MEDINI 2 1 9,700.00$ 55 0811621240023 7200 FLEETWOOD DR THOMAS P CLARK 2 1 9,700.00$ 56 0811621240032 7201 FLEETWOOD DR MARK G PROKOSCH & ELIZABETH S PROKOSCH 2 1 9,700.00$ 57 0811621240024 7204 FLEETWOOD DR MARK & JAMIE WELNICK 2 1 9,700.00$ 58 0811621240033 7205 FLEETWOOD DR MICHAEL B MCGOWAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 59 0811621240025 7208 FLEETWOOD DR J GERRY & CORRINE G BRIGGS 2 1 9,700.00$ 60 0811621240034 7209 FLEETWOOD DR JANET M HAEG 2 1 9,700.00$ 61 0811621240026 7212 FLEETWOOD DR TIMOTHY J & ANDREA M WALSH 2 1 9,700.00$ 62 0811621240035 7213 FLEETWOOD DR NISHANT SHUKLA 2 1 9,700.00$ 63 0811621240027 7216 FLEETWOOD DR CARRIE BREISACH & RYAN BREISACH 2 1 9,700.00$ Page 2 of 10 Page 487 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 64 0811621240036 7217 FLEETWOOD DR J H MASON & R B MASON 2 1 9,700.00$ 65 0811621240030 7220 FLEETWOOD DR DONALD G PATTON 2 1 9,700.00$ 66 0811621240037 7221 FLEETWOOD DR ANTHONY A NOTERMANN & CRSITINA F NOTERMANN 2 1 9,700.00$ 67 0811621240031 7224 FLEETWOOD DR JEFFREY D/JOANN W HAWTHORNE 2 1 9,700.00$ 68 0811621240038 7225 FLEETWOOD DR MICHAEL KEVIN KAY 2 1 9,700.00$ 69 0811621240071 5701 KEMRICH DR JAMES NEAL & KRISTEN NEAL 2 1 9,700.00$ 70 0811621240060 5704 KEMRICH DR THOMAS W COHEN & STACIE R COHEN 2 1 9,700.00$ 71 0811621240070 5705 KEMRICH DR CHRISTINE M WILLETT 2 1 9,700.00$ 72 0811621240061 5708 KEMRICH DR PATRICK DOUGLAS BENNETT 2 1 9,700.00$ 73 0811621240069 5709 KEMRICH DR DEBASISH N & ANITA D MALLICK 2 1 9,700.00$ 74 0811621240068 5713 KEMRICH DR KEITH & SARAH SOLSVIG 2 1 9,700.00$ 75 0811621240067 5717 KEMRICH DR HUAN MA & TAO GONG 2 1 9,700.00$ 76 0811621240057 5720 KEMRICH DR PEETER KIVESTU & PATRICIA C KIVESTU 2 1 9,700.00$ 77 0811621240066 5721 KEMRICH DR CHRISTOPHER/JENNIFER CHAPMAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 78 0811621240055 5724 KEMRICH DR KELLY R & DYAN R WESTMAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 79 0811621240065 5725 KEMRICH DR SHELDON R BURNS 2 1 9,700.00$ 80 0811621240054 5728 KEMRICH DR RONALD C ANDERSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 81 0811621240064 5729 KEMRICH DR JACK L LIEBO 2 1 9,700.00$ 82 0811621240007 5800 KEMRICH DR THOMAS R & JEANNE M MCCANNA 2 1 9,700.00$ 83 0811621240010 5801 KEMRICH DR IRIS MEDINI 2 1 9,700.00$ 84 0811621240008 5804 KEMRICH DR ROBERT L CUPERUS 2 1 9,700.00$ 85 0811621240011 5805 KEMRICH DR SUSAN WILLIAMS 2 1 9,700.00$ 86 0811621220036 7000 KERRY RD CHARLES S BLAND 1 1 19,000.00$ 87 0811621220052 7012 KERRY RD PETER K LEE 1 1 19,000.00$ 88 0811621220039 7016 KERRY RD GREGORY D STATTINE 1 1 19,000.00$ 89 0811621220042 7019 KERRY RD CHARLES BLOMME 1 1 19,000.00$ 90 0811621220058 7020 KERRY RD MARGARET CARLSON & RICHARD CARLSON 1 1 19,000.00$ 91 0811621210014 7000 LANHAM LA PAULINE & BOUAKE FOFANA 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 92 0811621210022 7001 LANHAM LA RICKY CHEATH 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 93 0811621210015 7004 LANHAM LA JAMES SIORIS & LARISA SIORIS 2 1 9,700.00$ 94 0811621210023 7005 LANHAM LA JOSEPH C CHAMBERLIN & PATRICIA A CHAMBERLIN 2 1 9,700.00$ Page 3 of 10 Page 488 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 95 0811621210016 7008 LANHAM LA JEFFREY B GISSELBECK 2 1 9,700.00$ 96 0811621210024 7009 LANHAM LA KRISHNA C PONUGOTI & DEEPTI D TORRI 2 1 9,700.00$ 97 0811621210017 7012 LANHAM LA SHEILA M CONWAY 2 1 9,700.00$ 98 0811621210025 7015 LANHAM LA DANIEL DUPREZ 2 1 9,700.00$ 99 0811621210018 7016 LANHAM LA GARY GIFT & ANNA JENKS 2 1 9,700.00$ 100 0811621210037 7017 LANHAM LA MICHAEL R LOMMEL & KATHRYN MARSHALL 2 1 9,700.00$ 101 0811621210019 7020 LANHAM LA KENT A RODRIGUEZ 2 1 9,700.00$ 102 0811621210038 7021 LANHAM LA CARLOS G LLANES & BERNADETTE G PIACEK- LLANES 2 1 9,700.00$ 103 0811621210020 7024 LANHAM LA RUSSELL S & DEBRA L ANDERSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 104 0811621210039 7025 LANHAM LA MILLARD M GARRISON 2 1 9,700.00$ 105 0811621210021 7028 LANHAM LA JOHN F KORTEBEIN & PATRICIA M KORTEBEIN 2 1 9,700.00$ 106 0811621210055 7029 LANHAM LA HENGJIE AI & RUYAN LIAO 2 1 9,700.00$ 107 0811621210056 7033 LANHAM LA VIJAY J & ANAGHA V DESHMUKH 2 1 9,700.00$ 108 0811621210057 7037 LANHAM LA JOHN DUFFEY 2 1 9,700.00$ 109 0811621210065 7040 LANHAM LA SEAN BRODERICK & DEBORAH BRODERICK 2 1 9,700.00$ 110 0811621210058 7041 LANHAM LA JOHN W DUFFEY 2 1 9,700.00$ 111 0811621210066 7044 LANHAM LA JAMES T MONTEZ 2 1 9,700.00$ 112 0811621210059 7045 LANHAM LA DEBRA N EVANS & KENNETH M TAGUCHI 2 1 9,700.00$ 113 0811621210067 7100 LANHAM LA TODD CAMPBELL JOHNSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 114 0811621210060 7101 LANHAM LA KIMBERLY M LUND & ERIK A LUND 2 1 9,700.00$ 115 0811621210068 7104 LANHAM LA MARTIN J & DEANNA M DUFFY 2 1 9,700.00$ 116 0811621210061 7105 LANHAM LA R LAURENCE JOHNSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 117 0811621210069 7108 LANHAM LA BENJAMIN & KATHERINE WANNINGER 2 1 9,700.00$ 118 0811621210062 7109 LANHAM LA LIVINGSTON/ANN SATTERTHWAITE 2 1 9,700.00$ 119 0811621210070 7112 LANHAM LA MICHAEL T & SUSAN G KRATZ 2 1 9,700.00$ 120 0811621210063 7113 LANHAM LA MIGUEL ALEXANDER POZO 2 1 9,700.00$ 121 0811621210071 7116 LANHAM LA ERIKA DE SALVATORE 2 1 9,700.00$ 122 0811621210064 7117 LANHAM LA ARLENE L WINNICK 2 1 9,700.00$ 123 0811621240039 7200 LANHAM LA JOHN E & SARAH M BERGSTROM 2 1 9,700.00$ 124 0811621240045 7201 LANHAM LA WILLIAM & PAMELA NERSESIAN 2 1 9,700.00$ Page 4 of 10 Page 489 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 125 0811621240040 7204 LANHAM LA KATHERINE C KIELY 2 1 9,700.00$ 126 0811621240046 7205 LANHAM LA KATHY J CHRISTENSEN & MARK S BURKE 2 1 9,700.00$ 127 0811621240041 7208 LANHAM LA KEVIN C & KAREN L NELSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 128 0811621240047 7209 LANHAM LA DUANE E DELEGARD 2 1 9,700.00$ 129 0811621240042 7212 LANHAM LA PATRICK K & KATHRYN A HORAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 130 0811621240048 7215 LANHAM LA MARK A GAASEDELEN 2 1 9,700.00$ 131 0811621240043 7216 LANHAM LA BART & LAURI PRINS 2 1 9,700.00$ 132 0811621240049 7219 LANHAM LA PHILIP J & MICHELE K MILLER 2 1 9,700.00$ 133 0811621240044 7220 LANHAM LA DONALD R MOSHER & JANE A MOSHER 2 1 9,700.00$ 134 0811621240050 7223 LANHAM LA ERIC & EVELYN GUSTAFSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 135 0811621240056 7300 LANHAM LA BARBARA A GROSSMAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 136 0811621240063 7301 LANHAM LA W A RUSH & M R RUSH 2 1 9,700.00$ 137 0811621240062 7305 LANHAM LA JASON WILLIAMS & CATHRYN A WILLIAMS 2 1 9,700.00$ 138 0811621210009 7000 LEE VALLEY CIR BRIAN M ERICKSON 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 139 0811621210002 7001 LEE VALLEY CIR KAMRAN KARIMI & SADIA ALI 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 140 0811621210010 7004 LEE VALLEY CIR SHILPA GUPTA 2 1 9,700.00$ 141 0811621210073 7005 LEE VALLEY CIR WENDY J LYON 2 1 9,700.00$ 142 0811621210011 7008 LEE VALLEY CIR BRIAN & KATHY ANDERSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 143 0811621210074 7009 LEE VALLEY CIR AMERI N KALAAJI & MAYA Y KALAAJI 2 1 9,700.00$ 144 0811621210005 7011 LEE VALLEY CIR GREGORY P & ROSE H SCHAEPPI 2 1 9,700.00$ 145 0811621210012 7012 LEE VALLEY CIR CAROL L SMITH 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 146 0811621210084 7013 LEE VALLEY CIR TAYLOR J ALEXANDER 2 1 9,700.00$ 147 0811621210085 7015 LEE VALLEY CIR BRIAN C BROWN & ELIZABETH A GERLACH 2 1 9,700.00$ 148 0811621210007 7017 LEE VALLEY CIR ELINOR MURAROVA & JOZEF MURAR 2 1 9,700.00$ 149 0811621210006 7021 LEE VALLEY CIR RAND E & JULIE A MATTSSON 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 150 0811621240082 5812 LEE VALLEY RD M E GHANCHI & C K GHANCHI 2 1 9,700.00$ 151 0811621240081 5900 LEE VALLEY RD NANCY H DRAKE 1 1 19,000.00$ 152 0811621230065 5901 LEE VALLEY RD STEVEN P MANACEK 1 1 19,000.00$ 153 0811621230020 5904 LEE VALLEY RD JOHN M ELLIOTT 1 1 19,000.00$ 154 0811621230066 5905 LEE VALLEY RD PRAVEEN R BAIMEEDI & KIRANMAI R DWARAM 1 1 19,000.00$ 155 0811621220025 5908 LEE VALLEY RD N C OLSEN & J L OLSEN 1 1 19,000.00$ 156 0811621220024 5912 LEE VALLEY RD MARY JANE NAEGELI 1 1 19,000.00$ Page 5 of 10 Page 490 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 157 0811621220023 5916 LEE VALLEY RD FARHAN HASSAN & NIDA GAUHAR 1 1 19,000.00$ 158 0811621220022 5920 LEE VALLEY RD GERALD T & NANCY E WITOWSKI 1 1 19,000.00$ 159 0811621240028 5805 SHANNON DR STEVEN C & TERESA M THOMPSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 160 0811621240029 5809 SHANNON DR DONALD E ROEPKE 2 1 9,700.00$ 161 0811621240083 5811 SHANNON DR MICHAEL J SABRE & MARY T SABRE 2 1 9,700.00$ 162 0811621210077 7020 SHANNON DR BARBARA J SWANKE & PERSONAL RES TRUST 2 1 9,700.00$ 163 0811621210076 7021 SHANNON DR ROHAAN F MEHTA & FEROZA R MEHTA 2 1 9,700.00$ 164 0811621210079 7028 SHANNON DR GREGORY S & KATHLEEN M GOOD 2 1 9,700.00$ 165 0811621210026 7100 SHANNON DR HOLLY H EASTMAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 166 0811621210030 7101 SHANNON DR JEFFREY A SUEDBECK & MARTHA RICHARDSON-SUEDBECK 2 1 9,700.00$ 167 0811621210027 7104 SHANNON DR JOHN G & LINDA L BERG 2 1 9,700.00$ 168 0811621210031 7105 SHANNON DR MICHAEL D & JOANNE M DOSEN 2 1 9,700.00$ 169 0811621210028 7108 SHANNON DR ROBERT G COWAN & JENNIFER M COWAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 170 0811621210032 7109 SHANNON DR LINDA BOELTER 2 1 9,700.00$ 171 0811621210029 7112 SHANNON DR THOMAS H BENNETT & ELIZABETH M BENNETT 2 1 9,700.00$ 172 0811621210033 7113 SHANNON DR DAVID A & ELIZABETH DRUCKMAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 173 0811621240019 7116 SHANNON DR TONG JIANG 2 1 9,700.00$ 174 0811621210034 7117 SHANNON DR MICHELLE THOMPSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 175 0811621240020 7120 SHANNON DR LYNN B BROWN 2 1 9,700.00$ 176 0811621210035 7121 SHANNON DR MARK & ANN RETHLAKE 2 1 9,700.00$ 177 0811621210036 7125 SHANNON DR THOMAS P MAGNE & LORENE E MAGNE 2 1 9,700.00$ 178 0811621240021 7129 SHANNON DR AMIT K GANGULY & TILLANA CHAKRABORTI 2 1 9,700.00$ 179 0811621240022 7133 SHANNON DR R J KLEBER & E B KLEBER 2 1 9,700.00$ 180 0811621240084 7201 SHANNON DR SUFIAN M ABU 1 1 19,000.00$ 181 0811621230024 7202 SHANNON DR JOHN W ELSING & PHYLIS A ELSING 1 1 19,000.00$ 182 0811621240080 7205 SHANNON DR EVAN ANDERSON & MARILYN ANDERSON 1 1 19,000.00$ 183 0811621240015 7208 SHANNON DR JAMES C GRAF & MARGARET M MICKELSON GRAF 1 1 19,000.00$ Page 6 of 10 Page 491 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 184 0811621240009 7209 SHANNON DR PAUL CARTER & CAROLYN CASSERLY CARTER 1 1 19,000.00$ 185 0811621240016 7300 SHANNON DR KATHRYN ANN SCOTT 2 1 9,700.00$ 186 0811621240012 7301 SHANNON DR LEONARD A MRACHEK 2 1 9,700.00$ 187 0811621240017 7304 SHANNON DR MICHAEL JAMES LEAF 2 1 9,700.00$ 188 0811621240013 7305 SHANNON DR MARY L & STEPHEN P JOHNSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 189 0811621240018 7308 SHANNON DR JOHN MCPHEE & BEVERLY MCPHEE 2 1 9,700.00$ 190 0811621240014 7309 SHANNON DR OXANA P HAFLUND 2 1 9,700.00$ 191 0811621240052 7220 TARA RD BORIS KOPILENKO & ERICA KOPILENKO 2 1 9,700.00$ 192 0811621130009 7221 TARA RD J C HULBERT 2 1 9,700.00$ 193 0811621240051 7224 TARA RD KELLY M & PATRICK W O'MEARA 2 1 9,700.00$ 194 0811621240058 7300 TARA RD MICHAEL A/JENNIFER D MORGAN 2 1 9,700.00$ 195 0811621240059 7304 TARA RD CRAIG SANDOK & CHRISTINA SANDOK 2 1 9,700.00$ 196 0811621130010 7315 TARA RD DALE A & REBECCA L WALKER 2 1 9,700.00$ 197 0811621220026 7100 TRALEE DR JOHN WALTER WILLIAMS & KAREN FONG WILLIAMS 1 1 19,000.00$ 198 0811621230022 7101 TRALEE DR JOHN G LOHMANN JR 1 1 19,000.00$ 199 0811621230021 7104 TRALEE DR MATTHEW & CATHERINE FAULKNER 1 1 19,000.00$ 200 0811621230026 7105 TRALEE DR ALAN L WEINER 1 1 19,000.00$ 201 0811621230027 7109 TRALEE DR HOYT M HSIAO 1 1 19,000.00$ 202 0811621230031 7115 TRALEE DR YOUNG LU 1 1 19,000.00$ 203 0811621230030 7117 TRALEE DR MICHAEL A SAMARA & STEPHANIE A SAMARA 1 0.67 12,730.00$ 204 0811621230029 7121 TRALEE DR RICHARD & CAROL JONES 1 1 19,000.00$ 205 0811621120057 5501 VILLAGE DR 101 EDWARD & CATHERINE KNIPPENBERG 3 0.25 850.00$ 206 0811621120105/06 5501 VILLAGE DR 101 Garage EDWARD E KNIPPENBERG & CATHERINE A KNIPPENBERG 3 0 -$ 207 0811621120058 5501 VILLAGE DR 102 JULIE A FORCHAY 3 0.25 850.00$ 208 0811621120079/80 5501 VILLAGE DR 102 Garage JULIE A FORCHAY 3 0 -$ 209 0811621120059 5501 VILLAGE DR 103 WITTER FAMILY TRUST 3 0.25 850.00$ 210 0811621120087/88 5501 VILLAGE DR 103 Garage WITTER FAMILY TRUST 3 0 -$ 211 0811621120060 5501 VILLAGE DR 104 ANDREW & LYNDSAY BATES 3 0.25 850.00$ 212 0811621120103/04 5501 VILLAGE DR 104 Garage ANDREW & LYNDSAY BATES 3 0 -$ 213 0811621120061 5501 VILLAGE DR 105 KARIN L STONE 3 0.25 850.00$ Page 7 of 10 Page 492 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 214 0811621120097/98 5501 VILLAGE DR 105 Garage KARIN L STONE 3 0 -$ 215 0811621120062 5501 VILLAGE DR 106 HAROLD J BLOOM & LAURA J BLOOM 3 0.25 850.00$ 216 0811621120073/74 5501 VILLAGE DR 106 Garage HAROLD J BLOOM & LAURA J BLOOM 3 0 -$ 217 0811621120063 5501 VILLAGE DR 201 FRANCIS A MCSHANE & SUSAN S MCSHANE 3 0.25 850.00$ 218 0811621120099/100 5501 VILLAGE DR 201 Garage FRANCIS A MCSHANE & SUSAN S MCSHANE 3 0 -$ 219 0811621120064 5501 VILLAGE DR 202 CAROL M LABERGE 3 0.25 850.00$ 220 0811621120101/02 5501 VILLAGE DR 202 Garage CAROL M LABERGE 3 0 -$ 221 0811621120065 5501 VILLAGE DR 203 JAMES A & LUCIA L SEIDEL 3 0.25 850.00$ 222 0811621120093/94 5501 VILLAGE DR 203 Garage JAMES A & LUCIA L SEIDEL 3 0 -$ 223 0811621120066 5501 VILLAGE DR 204 LORRAINE JANE BECKER 3 0.25 850.00$ 224 0811621120085/86 5501 VILLAGE DR 204 Garage LORRAINE JANE BECKER 3 0 -$ 225 0811621120067 5501 VILLAGE DR 205 RICHARD N MILLER & CAROLE L SENTY 3 0.25 850.00$ 226 0811621120075/76 5501 VILLAGE DR 205 Garage RICHARD N MILLER & CAROLE L SENTY 3 0 -$ 227 0811621120068 5501 VILLAGE DR 301 VERNA M NELSON 3 0.25 850.00$ 228 0811621120081/82/8 3/84 5501 VILLAGE DR 301 Garage VERNA M NELSON 3 0 -$ 229 0811621120069 5501 VILLAGE DR 302 JEANINE D POLITTE 3 0.25 850.00$ 230 0811621120077/78 5501 VILLAGE DR 302 Garage JEANINE D POLITTE 3 0 -$ 231 0811621120070 5501 VILLAGE DR 303 BONNIE ULMAN 3 0.25 850.00$ 232 0811621120095/96 5501 VILLAGE DR 303 Garage BONNIE ULMAN 3 0 -$ 233 0811621120107 5501 VILLAGE DR 304 GARY L ESLINGER & SHELLEY L ESLINGER 3 0.25 850.00$ 234 0811621120072 5501 VILLAGE DR 305 BENNETT D MELIN 3 0.25 850.00$ 235 0811621120091/92 5501 VILLAGE DR 305 Garage BENNETT D MELIN 3 0 -$ 236 0811621120028 5511 VILLAGE DR TAMARA CAMPBELL 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 237 0811621120027 5515 VILLAGE DR LAVONNE L GENZLINGER 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 238 0811621120026 5517 VILLAGE DR JUDITH A SULLIVAN 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 239 0811621120025 5519 VILLAGE DR NAMGYAL WANGDU & KALSANG C WANGDU 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 240 0811621120024 5521 VILLAGE DR KEN BARNES & KAY JOHNSON 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 241 0811621120023 5523 VILLAGE DR RACHEL JERSTAD 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 242 0811621120022 5525 VILLAGE DR JANELLE MANDERY 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 243 0811621120021 5527 VILLAGE DR EMILY SEARLE & ANDREW JENSEN 3 0.5 1,700.00$ Page 8 of 10 Page 493 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 244 0811621120033 5529 VILLAGE DR JOSEPH NEESER & MELANIE L MEYER 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 245 0811621120029 5530 VILLAGE DR SHELDON R CRAVENS 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 246 0811621120034 5531 VILLAGE DR JUTTA PETERS 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 247 0811621120030 5532 VILLAGE DR CHANGYUE LUO 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 248 0811621120035 5533 VILLAGE DR NANETTE E NYS 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 249 0811621120031 5534 VILLAGE DR MISBIL HAGI-SALAAD 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 250 0811621120036 5535 VILLAGE DR KIMBERLY J KRITZER 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 251 0811621120032 5536 VILLAGE DR EBONY A SAMPSON 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 252 0811621120037 5537 VILLAGE DR MERRY M OLSON 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 253 0811621120047 5538 VILLAGE DR SUDHAKAR MAKHAM 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 254 0811621120041 5539 VILLAGE DR BRIAN HUGHES & PAULA HUGHES 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 255 0811621120048 5540 VILLAGE DR LISA LOUISE OBERT 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 256 0811621120040 5541 VILLAGE DR GYORGY J SIMON & MAYUKO SIMON 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 257 0811621120049 5542 VILLAGE DR CHARLES H STEVENSON JR 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 258 0811621120039 5543 VILLAGE DR PEGGY L O'LOUGHLIN 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 259 0811621120050 5544 VILLAGE DR ROBERT BEVERAGE & CATHERINE A GASIOROWICZ 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 260 0811621120038 5545 VILLAGE DR JILL M ASKEY 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 261 0811621120051 5546 VILLAGE DR SREENIVASA RAO MAKINENI 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 262 0811621120046 5547 VILLAGE DR ANN MARIE BAUMGARTNER 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 263 0811621120052 5548 VILLAGE DR MARY K D BROWN 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 264 0811621120045 5549 VILLAGE DR W H SLAYTON & J F LOFTHUS 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 265 0811621120044 5551 VILLAGE DR MARK & AILEEN VELASCO 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 266 0811621120043 5553 VILLAGE DR SUSAN J SCHRADER 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 267 0811621120042 5555 VILLAGE DR DILYARA JEPBAROVA 3 0.5 1,700.00$ 268 0811621120126 7000 WESTON CIR ARON JACOBSON & ANGELA JACOBSON 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 269 0811621120137 7001 WESTON CIR RICHARD/JEANENE ENGEBRETSON 2 0.5 4,850.00$ 270 0811621120127 7004 WESTON CIR MANUEL A IDROGO & MIMI LAM 2 1 9,700.00$ 271 0811621120136 7005 WESTON CIR JOHN W CLINTON 2 1 9,700.00$ 272 0811621120128 7008 WESTON CIR BRUCE A THOMSON 2 1 9,700.00$ 273 0811621120135 7009 WESTON CIR PAUL J & JANE O CASHIN 2 1 9,700.00$ 274 0811621120129 7012 WESTON CIR JING WANG & CAIXIA GE 2 1 9,700.00$ 275 0811621120134 7013 WESTON CIR JEROME F MILLER JR & CAROL V MILLER 2 1 9,700.00$ Page 9 of 10 Page 494 of 668 PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID House No.Street Unit Unit 2 Owner Assess District Assessable REU Assessable Amount 276 0811621120130 7016 WESTON CIR CHRISTIAN VAILLANCOURT & LESLIE VAILLANCOURT 2 1 9,700.00$ 277 0811621120133 7017 WESTON CIR WOODSON M & NORMA V FOUNTAIN 2 1 9,700.00$ 278 0811621120131 7020 WESTON CIR ROBERT GILLUND 2 1 9,700.00$ 279 0811621120132 7021 WESTON CIR RONALD E DEHARPPORTE 2 1 9,700.00$ 280 0811621220015 7024 WEXFORD RD EDWARD M JANIGA 1 1 19,000.00$ 281 0811621220001 7028 WEXFORD RD LAUREL ANNE FERRIS 1 1 19,000.00$ 282 0811621220055 7032 WEXFORD RD SANDRA C CHAPMAN 1 1 19,000.00$ 283 0811621130012 24 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF EDINA 2 0 -$ Subtotal 1 58.67 1,114,730.00$ Subtotal 2 153 1,484,100.00$ Subtotal 3 20 68,000.00$ Total 231.67 2,666,830.00$ Page 10 of 10 Page 495 of 668 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates November 26, 2025, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. BA-458 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 26th d v. 2025. Oatt .1rA usIOLOW_ Sharon' Ilison, City Clerk Page 496 of 668 November 25, 2025 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 PROSPECT KNOLLS A, C & D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall on Monday, Dec. 8, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for Prospect Knolls A, C and D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2026 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2027. The estimated roadway cost for Assessment District 1 is $1,114,730, Assessment District 2 is $1,484,100 and Assessment District 3 is $68,000 and is funded by special assessment; the estimated cost per assessable lot for Assessment District 1 is $19,000, Assessment District 2 is $9,700, and Assessment District 3 is $1,700 per multi-family residential unit (condominium). The assessment can be divided over a fifteen-year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed roadway improvements includes all properties between and including: Assessment District 1: 7101 to 7123 Antrim Court, 7000 to 7021 Antrim Road, 2 to 8 Antrim Terrace, 7023 to 7104 Down Road, 7000 to 7013 Dublin Road, 7000 to 7020 Kerry Road, 5900 to 5920 Lee Valley Road, 7201 to 7209 Shannon Drive, 7100 to 7121 Tralee Drive, 5900 to 5920 West 70th Street, 7024 to 7032 Wexford Road Assessment District 2: 5820 to 5824 Dewey Hill Road, 6000 to 6013 Dublin Circle, 7100 to 7225 Fleetwood Drive, 5701 to 5805 Kemrich Drive, 7000 to 7305 Lanham Lane, 7000 to 7021 Lee Valley Circle, 5812 Lee Valley Road, 5805 to 7133 Shannon Drive, 7300 to 7309 Shannon Drive, 7220 to 7315 Tara Road, 7000 to 7021 Weston Circle Assessment District 3: 5501 to 5555 Village Drive Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Staff’s recommendations to City Council are: • Reconstruct the following streets to 24-feet wide, including one-sided parking, and a 5-feet concrete sidewalk: o Shannon Dr from Dewey Hill Rd to Kemrich Dr, sidewalk on the east side o Lanham Ln between Fleetwood Dr and W 70th St, sidewalk on the south / west side o Fleetwood Dr, sidewalk on the west side o Kemrich Dr, sidewalk on the north side • Kerry Rd and Village Dr reconstructed to 24-feet wide and 30-feet wide, respectively ; all other streets reconstructed to 27-feet wide • New concrete curb and gutter and new asphalt pavement on all streets • Partial extension and partial replacement of watermain; full replacement of water services, hydrants and valves Page 497 of 668 • Storm sewer improvements to resolve local drainages issues and installation of sump drains where feasible • Partial extension, spot repairs and structural lining of the sanitary sewer main The Engineering Study will be available online as part of the Dec. 8 City Council meeting agenda at https://edinamn.portal.civicclerk.com; under Event Categories select City Council Meeting, click Search and you will see the Dec. 8 Agenda. Page 498 of 668 Notice of Public Hearing 2026 Prospect Knolls A, C & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction November 25, 2025 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Further Information: City of Edina Engineering, 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 952-826-0371 Provide Input to Engineering Staff 1 – Post questions online at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls for review by Engineering staff 2 – Write to City of Edina, Attention Engineering, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN 55439 Provide Public Input Share your thoughts! Public input can be provided in a variety of methods to City Council. All comments are reviewed and considered; therefore, you do not need to participate in more than one method. Public Input Options: 1 – Provide public input online at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings. (Available now) 2 – Leave a voicemail with your public input at 952-826-0377. Staff will submit the transcribed voicemail to Better Together Edina. (Available now) 3 – A public hearing will take place in the City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St., 6 p.m. Monday, December 8, 2025. Attend the meeting in person or watch the meeting live from home on cable channels 813 or 16 or stream live on YouTube.com/EdinaTV, or EdinaMN.gov/Meetings. Call in to provide live testimony at 312-535-8110 the night of the meeting and enter access code 2633 585 6275, password is 5454. City Council will make a decision at its meeting 7 p.m. Tuesday, Dec. 16. Page 499 of 668 Current resident Address Sub id1 Ctu name State code Zip CURRENT RESIDENT 7000 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5804 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6013 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7028 WEXFORD RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7305 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7029 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7009 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5805 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7301 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7016 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7117 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7104 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7209 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7019 KERRY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7001 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7112 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7105 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7004 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7215 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7200 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7100 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7009 DUBLIN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7109 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7224 TARA RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7044 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7008 DUBLIN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7012 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7129 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7104 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7005 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7005 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7104 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7100 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7004 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5708 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5720 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7101 ANTRIM CT EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7041 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7217 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6005 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7202 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7220 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 Page 500 of 668 CURRENT RESIDENT 7115 ANTRIM CT EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7016 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7216 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5905 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5908 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7001 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7116 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7040 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7017 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7105 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7001 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7109 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7020 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5721 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7117 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7119 ANTRIM CT EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7012 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7020 KERRY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5709 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7120 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7100 DOWN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7028 DOWN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7221 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7100 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7112 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5916 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7123 ANTRIM CT EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6008 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7021 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5805 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7105 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5901 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7220 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7013 DUBLIN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7011 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7021 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6009 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7105 ANTRIM CT EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7033 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7109 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5713 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7205 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7037 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7121 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 Page 501 of 668 CURRENT RESIDENT 5705 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7104 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7016 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5724 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7209 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7001 DUBLIN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7009 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7017 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7204 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7117 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5904 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7213 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7208 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7009 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7133 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6012 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7205 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7105 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7300 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7101 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7000 KERRY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7108 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7000 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7212 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7108 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7016 KERRY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5704 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7017 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7020 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 8 ANTRIM TER EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7208 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6000 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7224 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7220 TARA RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7125 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7121 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7113 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6004 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7024 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7116 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7209 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7021 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5729 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7121 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 Page 502 of 668 CURRENT RESIDENT 7113 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7045 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5717 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7029 DOWN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7204 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7015 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 4 ANTRIM TER EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7109 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7001 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7212 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7101 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5809 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7000 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7020 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7000 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7024 DOWN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7012 KERRY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7000 DUBLIN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7301 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7225 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5701 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5725 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7221 TARA RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7117 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7024 WEXFORD RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7023 DOWN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7017 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7021 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7104 DOWN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7108 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 2 ANTRIM TER EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7012 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7025 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7200 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7013 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5900 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7113 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7216 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7109 ANTRIM CT EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7032 WEXFORD RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7201 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7008 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7008 WESTON CIR EDINA MN 55439 Page 503 of 668 CURRENT RESIDENT 7208 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5801 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5920 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5800 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7300 TARA RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5811 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7100 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7304 TARA RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5812 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7205 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7012 DUBLIN RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7116 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7115 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7028 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7015 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5728 KEMRICH DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6 ANTRIM TER EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7101 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7021 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7005 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7112 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7315 TARA RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5912 LEE VALLEY RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 6001 DUBLIN CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7013 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7008 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7120 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7004 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7301 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7219 LANHAM LN EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7101 TRALEE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7005 ANTRIM RD EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 7028 SHANNON DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 204 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 105 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5544 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 305 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5531 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5536 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 202 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5555 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5535 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 301 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5539 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 Page 504 of 668 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 303 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 104 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5547 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5521 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5545 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5530 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5542 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5559 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5545 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 205 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 304 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5511 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 106 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5557 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5551 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 103 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5523 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5527 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 102 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5565 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5532 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5543 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5515 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5537 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5533 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5546 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5509 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 302 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 101 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5515 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5523 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5541 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5525 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5511 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5551 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5555 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5541 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5538 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5505 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 203 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5519 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5534 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5531 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 Page 505 of 668 CURRENT RESIDENT 5501 VILLAGE DR 201 EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5517 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5540 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5549 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5553 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5548 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5527 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5519 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5529 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5549 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5553 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5539 VILLAGE DR EDINA MN 55439 CURRENT RESIDENT 5561 70TH ST EDINA MN 55439 Page 506 of 668 Survey Responses 03 November 2025 - 02 December 2025 Provide Public Input on Reconstruction Projects Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Page 507 of 668 Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Responded At:Nov 28, 2025 08:31:29 am Last Seen:Nov 28, 2025 08:31:29 am Q1.First & Last Name Jeff Gisselbeck Q2.Address 7008 Lanham ln Q3.Which project would you like to comment on? PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Q4.PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION I really don’t think we need to have a sidewalk.!! I am sure that will go on deaf ears with the council since I’ve seen every other request for no sidewalks ignored. I don’t Understand why the city wants to continue to shove sidewalks on residents ,where they’re not wanted or needed. I realize the people that made these decisions in the committees or commissions. They Would love to get rid of automobile traffic. I remember one commissioner saying he would like to get all the cars off the street and ride bikes everywhere. Please tell that to the Edina mother that needs to take their kids to hockey practice. I Would also like a curb that is not so rigid more of a trough. Gutter. Also sprinkler system will that be totally reconfigured to water the boulevard and yard I think the 5 foot sidewalk is also too wide. I feel that the sidewalk that was produced into the plan was set up over 10 years ago is obsolete. Hopefully the city Council will hear the people this time. Q5.W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Q6.PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Page 508 of 668 Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Responded At:Nov 28, 2025 13:28:49 pm Last Seen:Nov 28, 2025 13:28:49 pm Q1.First & Last Name Sarah Lenhardt Q2.Address 5804 Kemrich Drive Q3.Which project would you like to comment on? PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Q4.PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION We are very concerned about the proposed narrowing of the roads on Kemrich Drive and Fleetwood Drive. We are parents of children ages 6-14. Our children spend a lot of time biking - including biking Kemrich drive and Fleetwood drive to get to school. Sidewalks are not ideal for biking and teens/adults are generally discouraged from biking on sidewalks as walkers have the right of way. With large hills and blind turns on fleetwood and the frequency of cars/trucks parked on both roads, we are very concerned that narrowing the roads will make it much more dangerous for our kids to bike safely to school and the park. Q5.W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Q6.PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Page 509 of 668 Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Responded At:Dec 01, 2025 14:09:30 pm Last Seen:Dec 01, 2025 14:09:30 pm Q1.First & Last Name Bob Beverage Q2.Address 5544 Village Drive Q3.Which project would you like to comment on? PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Q4.PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Hi, I received the Notice of Public Hearing for the 2026 Prospect Knolls roadway reconstruction. My wife and I live at 5544 Village Drive which is a part of the West Village Association, a part of the District 3 Assessment. As you know, the total District 3 Assessment is listed at $68,000, or $1,700/multi-family residential unit (condominium). $68,000 divided by $1,700/unit = 40 units paying the assessment. However, there are 32 units in our townhome association, and by my count, there are another 24 condominiums in the 5501 Village Drive condo building. So, actually there are cars belonging to 56 units using Village Drive (the roadway being resurfaced). $68,000 divided evenly among 56 units would be just over $1,200/unit (rather than the $1,700/unit listed). If you would, help me understand the discrepancy in either the number of units or how the division of the assessment is being calculated. Thank you. Bob Beverage Q5.W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Q6.PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Page 510 of 668 Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Responded At:Dec 02, 2025 11:16:24 am Last Seen:Dec 02, 2025 11:16:24 am Q1.First & Last Name Steven Soltau Q2.Address 7116 Fleetwood Drive, Edina MN 55439 Q3.Which project would you like to comment on? PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Page 511 of 668 Q4.PROSPECT KNOLLS A/C/D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Honorable Mayor Hovland and Council Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce and Rissler: I am writing to express specific objections and concerns I have with the proposed action to approve the Prospect Knoll A/C/D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project. Specifically, I and virtually every neighbor I have talked to object to the narrowing of Fleetwood Dr. and parts of Shannon Dr., Kemrich Dr., and Lanham Ln for inclusion of a sidewalk and utilization of barrier vs. surmountable curb. I and many of my neighbors attended and voiced concerns and objections at the Informational Resident Meeting on August 26th. Without any further review or consideration of concerns, plans have proceeded for submission and approval. It was apparent at this meeting engineering staff is relying on both the Living Streets Policy and the Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2015 and 2018 respectively. We acknowledge the efforts and intent with both of these published items but feel there are both significant changes in how our streets are utilized currently and errors in recognizing how our neighborhood local street works specifically. These planning and policy-based documents are completed with great effort and detail, but they are also done at 30,000 feet and can be in error when actually applied. We believe holding the detail of an exhibit completed by a third-party planner looking at plans in two dimensions should not be the basis for approval when engineering demonstrates significant challenges when looked at with three dimensions. The specifics of the area deserve closer, site specific review before further approval. We live on a hill. In addition to this grade of the street, many of our driveways are at the maximum grade that was probably allowed when originally approved and improved. Especially on the west side of Fleetwood, many homeowners have to approach driveways at an angle to avoid scraping vehicles on pavement. This is even more of a problem with the occasional trailer or low or longer vehicle. We live on a hill. Our street is attractive to the Cross Country skiers that train and exercise with what I call Clicky Clack roller skis. We get some runners too. Mostly we have people walking pets or simply exercising and taking a casual walk. Many are single, but some are in groups of even 4 or more plus pets. What we have very little of is anyone commuting to a commercial area like the policy objectives laid out in the approved planning documents. Even the Livable Streets document notes distance as a limitation in promoting school age children “commuting” to schools. We don’t have 50th and France. We don’t have Southdale. We are not in a urban part of Edina. We live in a calm quiet part of a suburban part of Edina. We do not walk or bike to 70th and Cahill for dining or commercial trips. I would like to point out the fact that the Livable Streets Policy document identifies Fleetwood and the connecting elements of the other streets as “Local Street” and not a “Local Collector”. There is no call or plan for a sidewalk in this document. The recommended design does NOT include a sidewalk. I would also like to point out the fact that staff cites a old historical suggestion that sidewalks are better placed on the north and west side of streets based on the simplified thought that they are likely to get more sunshine. This is the only basis for placing sidewalks on the north and west side? This can’t be this simple. Did they even look at grades of homes and driveways? Did they look at existing mature vegetation and landscaping? Staff also cited the use of barrier curb as “the policy that has been in place since I have been here.” Really? As a developer, most communities require surmountable curb on local streets, avoiding the requirement of additional aprons and having flexibility with driveway locations. Maybe it is time to review the curb policy. With a 9% grade on my driveway, if I have a trailer, I have to angle over my yard to get in and out of the driveway even with a short empty trailer and this is with my short wheel based, elevated Jeep Wrangler. It was worse with the full length Yukon I had before. I need the surmountable curb, and I am not alone. Many of my neighbors tell me they have to approach their existing driveways at an angle, or they scrape their cars. This will only get worse with the effort to add a level sidewalk requiring any additional width and shortening of the driveways. We live on a hill. We will be required to keep the sidewalks clear of snow and ice. Many times with unavoidable icy conditions, I am challenged to clear my driveway and have also slid down when placing garbage and recycling containers at the end of my driveway. We have to salt and sand to avoid injury. With adding sidewalks, you are asking us to accept liability for a condition we didn’t buy into, never planned for, wanted or expected in our wildest dreams. If I wanted sidewalks and walkability to a real commercial area like 50th and France, I would have stayed near the home on Bruce Ave. in the Country Club area I grew up in. We live in the hilly, rolling area of curve and linear streets. We like our wider street without sidewalks. We need our surmountable curbs in many of the areas that have them. We also like not needing driveway aprons (required with Barrier curb design, but not with Surmountable curbs) Aprons only further exacerbate grade challenges we have with our driveways. We like our street the way it is and encourage you to listen to the concerns we have and to recognize the error in applying blanket policy objectives to this specific situation and area. We live on a hill. Steven and Jane Soltau 7116 Fleetwood Drive Page 512 of 668 Q5.W 72ND STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Q6.PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION not answered Page 513 of 668 Page 514 of 668 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-116 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR PROSPECT KNOLLS A, C and D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA-458 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of November 2025, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA-458, the proposed improvement of Prospect Knolls A, C and D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weekly published notices of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of December 2025, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: December 16, 2025 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 16, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Page 515 of 668 d ITEM REPORT Date: December 8, 2025 Item Activity: Approve Meeting: City Council Agenda Number: 5.3 Prepared By: Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer Item Type: Public Hearing Department: Engineering Item Title: PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2025-117 Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-467 Action Requested: Motion to close the in person public hearing, keep the online public input open until noon, December 10, and continue action on the item to the December 16 City Council meeting Information/Background: Staff initiated this project. Staff proposes to reconstruct Parklawn Court from Parklawn Avenue to the cul-de-sac. Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. Between November 26, when public hearing notices were mailed, and December 3, when this public hearing document agenda item was submitted for the December 8 City Council packet, 0 comments were received on BetterTogetherEdina.org. Public hearing input closes at noon on December 10. Resources/Financial Impacts: The overall project cost is estimated at $462,450. Funding will be a combination of special assessments, City Utility and Pedestrian and Cyclists Safety (PACS) funds, and property taxes. Relationship to City Policies: The project includes CIP No. ENG21023. Budget Pillar: Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Replacing aging infrastructure at the appropriate time is sound asset management practice. Supporting Documentation: 1. 2026 Street Reconstruction Public Improvement Hearing Staff Presentation 2. Engineering Study BA-467 Page 516 of 668 3. Certificate of Mailing 4. Resolution No. 2025-117 Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. BA-467 Page 517 of 668 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Public Improvement Hearings December 8, 2025 Page 518 of 668 Agenda •Thank You –Residents and Council •Infrastructure Spending •Project Similarities •Multimodal Information Sharing •West 72nd Street •Prospect Knolls A, C & D •Parklawn Court Blake Road Fall 2023 Page 519 of 668 Infrastructure Spending •Budget Work Plan – Pillar #1 Strong Foundation •Infrastructure meets community needs now and in the future •Multi-Modal Transportation Network – Roads, Sidewalks, Bicycle Facilities, Mass Transit •Clean & Safe Drinking Water – Water Treatment Plants, Distribution Networks. •Sanitation – Sanitary Sewer, Wastewater •Flood Protection - Storm Sewer, Lakes, Ponds Page 520 of 668 Pavement Condition Index - Citywide Page 521 of 668 Pavement Condition Index https://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/ Page 522 of 668 Page 523 of 668 Infrastructure Asset Management Page 524 of 668 Build-outInfrastructure DividendsCommitment to ReinvestMaintenance GenerationInfrastructure Asset Management Page 525 of 668 2026 Project Areas •West 72 nd Street •Local Street •20 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •Local Streets •283 Properties •Parklawn Court •Local Street •4 Properties Page 526 of 668 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility information •Bike and ped system needs & gaps Page 527 of 668 Proposed Watermain Improvements •Replace water services project wide •Replace hydrants and gate valves project wide •Replace partial watermain •Verify appropriate hydrant spacing and add hydrants if needed to meet public safety standards •Paid for under watermain fund Page 528 of 668 Proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements •Spot trunk pipe repairs and cured- in-place pipe liners to reduce I&I •Replace manhole castings and rings •Paid for from sanitary sewer fund Page 529 of 668 Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements •Modifications to roadway and storm sewer to improve existing drainage issues •Replace curb and gutter •Install sump drain pipe where feasible •Paid for by the storm sewer fund Page 530 of 668 Right-of-Way Impacts •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Sod Restoration Page 531 of 668 Project Schedules Neighborhood Informational Video Presentation Various *City Council Rejects Prospect Knolls A 2020 Project January 7, 2020 Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Public Hearing Opens / Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Public Hearing Closes December 10, 2025 Public Hearing Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract / Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 Page 532 of 668 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements. Adjacent properties. •2021 Policy Change •Transition to taxes over 16 year •Covers 52.6% of roadway costs Construction Year % of Local Roadway Costs Assessed 2020 100% 2021-2024 78.90%-63.12% 2025 57.86% 2026 52.60% 2027-2035 47.34%-5.26% 2036 0% Page 533 of 668 Special Assessments •Covers 52.6% of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Gravel base •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings •Remainder of roadway costs are covered by property taxes Page 534 of 668 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence * Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties Scenario Land Use Class REU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 C Multi-Family Residential – Apartment/Condos 0.5 Page 535 of 668 19 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 536 of 668 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2025 interest rate was 4.98% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 537 of 668 Strategic Guidance •Comprehensive Plan •Race and Equity Plan •Climate Action Plan •Living Streets Plan •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan •Active Routes to School Plan Approved Plans Budget Pillars Page 538 of 668 Guiding Objectives Meet the needs of all users and abilities Provide connectivity for everyday uses Improve safety and comfort Encourage alternative transportation Page 539 of 668 Quality of Life Survey 2025 •Most liked attribute of living in Edina: Convenient location/accessibility/ walkability - 45% •Ease of travel (% excellent or good):•Overall – 84•By Car – 79•Walking – 70•Biking – 61 •Quality of city services (% excellent or good):•Condition of trails and sidewalks – 87•Sidewalk maintenance – 77 •Importance of transportation emission reduction actions such as sidewalks, bike lanes, public EV charging (% essential or very important) – 69 Page 540 of 668 Safe & Equitable Mobility Action Plan •Aimed at reducing fatal and serious injury crashes for all road users •Key themes of Phase 1 community engagement: •Streets without sidewalks increase risk for vulnerable users •Desire for safer connections to parks, transit and commercial areas, especially for children and elderly residents •Interest in physical design solutions to address vehicle speeds •Delays in sidewalk implementation have long-term impacts on health and mobility Page 541 of 668 Proposed Improvements Meet the needs of all users and abilities Provide connectivity for everyday usesImprove safety and comfort Encourage alternative transportation Page 542 of 668 EdinaMN.gov Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-467 Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Page 543 of 668 Project Details –Parklawn Ct •4 property owners (41.5 REUs) •325-ft of road •1,221 square yards of street pavement Page 544 of 668 Existing Roadways Conditions •Streets originally constructed in the 1966 •Existing street widths is 36-ft •Silty sandy soils Page 545 of 668 Existing Roadways Conditions •City of Edina Network Average Pavement Condition Index –78 •Parklawn Ct –51 Page 546 of 668 Parklawn Court – Existing Multi-Modal Facilities Sidewalk on Parklawn Ave Sidewalk on 76th St WSidewalk on Parklawn Ave Nine Mile Regional Trail Page 547 of 668 Parklawn Court – Existing Multi-Modal Facilities •Metro Transit Local Route 6 stop adjacent to project area •Additional stops within ½ mile (Parklawn Ave, 76th St) •Adjacent to CloverRide service area Page 548 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Sidewalks •5’ concrete walk on both sides of stem •8’ concrete walk on back of curb around bulb Page 549 of 668 Existing: 36’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed: 27’ road width, one-sided parking Parklawn Court - Roadway Typical Section •Existing •36’ Roadway width •Two -sided parking •Proposed •27’ road width •Reduce street width by 9’ •One-sided parking •No parking in the cul- de-sac •5’ sidewalk on both sides* •0-5’ grass boulevard on both sides Page 550 of 668 Estimated Project Costs Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway $77,850 Special Assessments Lighting $17,600 Special Assessments Roadway $113,700 Property Taxes Roadway Total:$209,150 Sanitary Sewer $21,300 Watermain $78,700 Storm Sewer *$95,400 Utility Total:$195,400 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total:$57,900 PACS Fund Project Total:$462,450 *Includes concrete curb and gutter •Engineering, clerical, finance costs and contingency included Page 551 of 668 Estimated Roadway Assessments •4 property owners (41.5 REUs) •0.5 REU per Apt. unit (0.25 for corner property) •$95,450 / 41.5 REUs •$2,300 per REU •$1,037.50 per Apt. Unit (Includes $192 per Apt. Unit for street light) Page 552 of 668 •Properties could see an average price benefit of: •$3,000 to $5,000 per Apt. unit •Preliminary Assessment •$1,037.50 per Apt. unit •($2,273 pre policy change) Market Benefit Estimate Page 553 of 668 Recommendation •Reminder - Approving Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements requires a minimum of 3 out of 5 Council votes in favor to pass •Staff believes this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure •Motion to close the public hearing at noon, December 10,and to continue action on the item to the December 16 City Council meeting. (Improvement No. BA-467) Page 554 of 668 Thank you for your time! Page 555 of 668 ENGINEERING STUDY PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Parklawn Court IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 DECEMBER 1, 2025 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 42003 12/1/25 Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Page 556 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local concrete streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, construction of new sidewalk, lining of sanitary sewer, localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $462,450. 47.40% of the roadway cost will be funded through property taxes and 52.60% will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $2,300 per residential equivalent unit (REU), or $1,037.50 per apartment unit. Utility improvements amount to $195,400 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are estimated to cost $57,900 and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure” and the “Strong Foundations” City budget pillar. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. LOCATION: The project includes Parklawn Court. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Page 557 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways Parklawn Court was originally constructed in 1966. Various concrete panels have been replaced over the years, but no maintenance has been performed over the entire street (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Parklawn Court Neighborhood, 1967 Parklawn Court, as a concrete street, has integral curb. The roadway width is 36’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 8” of concrete pavement over an apparent aggregate base followed by a combination of silty sand and sand with silt soils. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc. for bituminous streets ; popouts, longitudinal and transverse cracking, potholes, etc. for concrete streets). The average Page 558 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 4 PCI for the City of Edina is 78 and the average PCI for Parklawn Court is 51. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition Traffic and Crash Data Given the location and context of this project, staff did not measure traffic volumes or speeds. It is assumed that the volume and speed are comparable to most local streets in the City (≤ 1,000 vehicles per day, 85th-percentile speeds ≤ 30 miles per hour, respectively). Crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no pedestrian facilities within the project area. There are sidewalks on Parklawn Avenue and W 76th Street immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix B). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area. The project area is less than ¼ mile (or a 1-minute bike ride) from the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (see Appendix C). Page 559 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 5 Transit Facilities Metro Transit’s Local Route 6 serves this neighborhood, with bus stops along Parklawn Avenue and W 76th Street. Local Routes 537 and 540 also operate within a ½ mile of the project area. Most of the bus stops adjacent to the project area are accessible by sidewalks; none have shelters. Parklawn Court is also within the service area of the City’s CloverRide circulator bus service. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer Parklawn Court has one 9” vitrified clay sanitary sewer main pipe (VCP), installed in 1964. Historical records do not indicate any sewer back-ups or blockages in the area. (see Appendix D). Watermain Parklawn Court has one 8” cast iron watermain pipe (CIP), installed in 1964. The watermain has experienced 1 break, and one water valve failure (see Appendix D). The hydrant is original to the neighborhood. Based on Utility Billing records, there are no properties in the project area that rely on private wells for domestic water. Storm Sewer Parklawn Court drains overland into drainage structures at the intersection of Parklawn Avenue. The two 12” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) leads were installed in 1964, and are in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Parklawn Court drains to the City’s storm sewer system that drains into the Fred Richards Park series of ponds and eventually drains westward to the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek. Street Lighting The City owned street lighting system consists of two lights mounted on steel poles with davit arms as shown in Appendix E. The lighting is sufficient; however, the lights and conduit were installed in 1989 and are in poor condition and nearing the end of their useful life. Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present along Parklawn Court. These utilities are a combination of overhead facilities located in backyards and underground utilities along the boulevards. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendices B and C, there are no proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project area. Page 560 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 6 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and people with disabilities. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges, and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. Water Resource Management Plan (December 2022 Amendment) Municipal stormwater systems provide multiple functions, including runoff management (removal of stormwater) and flood risk reduction. The system is composed of structural or engineered control devices and facilities to treat, convey, or store polluted stormwater. Enhancing public infrastructure by building new, retrofitting old, and maintaining existing in working condition is a key action to reducing flood exposure. City Council adopted the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy in 2020, and it was incorporated into the Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) by major amendment. The primary goal Page 561 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 7 for the City’s flood risk reduction effort is to improve public safety and reduce the exposure of private principal structures to flooding. It is the City’s standard practice to provide a 10-percent-annual-chance level of service and 1-percent-annual-chance level (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency events, respectively) of protection for principal structures for the City’s stormwater conveyance systems, where feasible. The WRMP identified that the entirety of Parklawn Court lies within the 1-percent- annual-chance flood event and all but the cul-de-sac bulb is within the 10-percent- annual chance flood event, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2: Parklawn Court Floodzones (NMS_70) This modeled inundation areas impact both the roadway and private property sections of Parklawn Court. 9.9 acres of stormwater from the neighboring properties discharge to the City’s storm sewer system that drains into the Fred Richards Park series of ponds and eventually drains westward to the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek. The 1-percent and 10-percent-annual-chance events could impact the garage structures at 4415 and 4435 Parklawn Cout. Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 1-percent and 10-percent-annual-chance events at the intersection of Parklawn Avenue. Climate Action Plan The CAP identified the following strategies that align with this roadway reconstruction project. Transportation and Land Use (TL) 1: Decrease community-wide vehicle miles traveled by 7% by 2030. Page 562 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 8 Action TL 1-2: Accelerate building on-street and off-street protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas and fill connectivity gaps as identified in the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. TL 2: Double public transit commuter ridership from 3.3% to 6.6% by 2030. Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They support replacement of concrete curb and gutter, as well as replacement of deficient watermain components (including fire hydrants, gate valves and water services). Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements. They noted that temporary fire hydrants should be consistent in style for ease of access, that emergency access should always be maintained during construction and that drive widths and turnarounds should meet local design guidelines. Since the nearby buildings are multi-story, non-sprinklered multifamily structures, the Fire Department requested a cul-de-sac large enough for a ladder truck to operate safely. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 23, 2025, a draft engineering study was provided for review. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting is included in Appendix G. Residents Residents were invited to an informational presentation and were able to directly ask questions to staff in August 2025. Residents were notified of a recorded video version of the August 2025 informational presentation posted on the Better Together Edina website, where residents were able to ask questions to staff from the Better Together Edina website, as well as telephone and email. Materials from the August 2025 informational presentation can be found in Appendix H. On June 25, 2025, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation and local drainage problems within the project area. Unique feedback was requested on potential support of sidewalks on Parklawn Court. Unfortunately, only one resident completed the questionnaire. We will re-engage the owners and residents again before the Public Hearing to attempt to get more responses. The full questionnaire and one response can be found in Appendix I. Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix J. Page 563 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 9 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. The proposed improvements also align with the Budget Work Plan values and goals developed by the City Council and staff. Roadways Typical Section The concrete roadway is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. A minimum of 8” of aggregate base material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous non-wear and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. Parklawn Court is designated as a Local Street in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalks or 24’ with an 8’ shared-use path or 5’ sidewalk on one side. Parklawn Court is proposed to be 27’ wide to accommodate the higher frequency of larger vehicles that serve the adjacent multi- family properties. Cul-de-Sac The cul-de-sac bulb is proposed to be reduced to an 80’ diameter. With an 8’ wide sidewalk on the back of curb, designed to structurally support the Fire Department’s ladder truck, this configuration will meet the Fire Department’s operational needs. Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. Parking is proposed to be restricted within the cul-de-sac bulb, with one-sided parking provided along the roadway to allow space for proposed sidewalks on both sides. The existing and proposed roadway widths, sidewalks and parking recommendations are also shown in Figure 3 and Table 1. Existing 36’ road width, two-sided parking Page 564 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 10 Proposed 27’ road width, one-sided parking Figure 3: Parklawn Court Street Existing Roadway Width (face to face), feet Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Sidewalk Width, feet Boulevard Width, feet Parking Parklawn Court 36 27 5 0-5 Southeast Side Cul-de-sac 97.5* 80* 5 0-5 None * Diameter of the cul-de-sac Table 1: Street Widths, Sidewalks and Parking Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs will conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Multi-Modal Transportation Staff seeks to balance the recommendations of the City’s guiding documents (Living Streets Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and Climate Action Plan), feedback from affected residents, available right-of-way and potential tree and infrastructure impacts. Staff is proposing new sidewalks along both sides of Parklawn Court and around the cul-de-sac bulb (see Figure 4). Page 565 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 11 Figure 4: Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Although no new facilities are recommended in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, the proposed sidewalks are consistent with the character of the neighborhood as many adjacent local streets have pedestrian facilities on both sides (Parklawn Avenue, West 76th Street and Gallagher Drive). The proposed sidewalks also support the Climate Action Plan goal to “accelerate building…sidewalks and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas.” Compared to Edina overall, this neighborhood has a higher percentage of population identifying as Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC); a higher percentage of population in poverty; a higher percentage of population under the age of 18; and a higher percentage of population that is foreign-born. The proposed multi-modal facilities will improve access, mobility and safety for these populations. The grass boulevards that will separate the new curb and the proposed sidewalks are proposed to be 5’-wide but may vary depending on construction conflicts. Separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. The 8’-wide sidewalk will be on the back of curb in the cul-de-sac bulb to support Fire Department operational needs. Page 566 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 12 All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and portions of the existing sidewalks will be reconstructed as necessary. The 8’-wide sidewalks in the cul-de-sac bulb will be maintained by Public Works staff to support the Fire Department’s operational needs. The 5’-wide sidewalks will be maintained by adjacent property owners as they are not within state or county right-of-way, along Municipal State Aid routes, or included in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan. Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities in this project area. Transit Facilities An accessible boarding area (also referred to as an ADA pad) will be constructed at the bus stop adjacent to the project area. Staff will coordinate with Metro Transit on the design and location of the pad. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain within the project area, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. Based on the positive pipe condition assessment and minimal historical break data, the watermain will not be replaced. All water service leads to properties, gate valves, and the single fire hydrant along Parklawn Court will be replaced. The new fire hydrant will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. Storm Sewer Because the existing curb and gutter are integral with the concrete pavement, they will be replaced as part of the roadway pavement reconstruction, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. The existing drainage structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition as well as the proposed roadway width change. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. There are no specific improvements in the project area that can reduce flood exposure. Grading for the roadway should be reviewed to ensure no additional fill within the local flood area. If possible, cul-de-sac grades could be slightly lowered to provide a marginal increase in flood storage. Increasing stormwater storage in Fred Richards Park will be necessary in the future to help reduce flood risk on Parklawn Court. Page 567 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 13 Flood exposure and vulnerability reducing advice is provided on the City of Edina flood resources website at https://www.edinamn.gov/371/Flooding-and-Drainage including mapping tools and fact sheets to visualize and prepare for floods. Street Lighting The City owned street lighting system will be removed and replaced by Xcel Energy due to its poor condition. Staff is preparing an agreement with Xcel Energy for the proposed street lighting system work. The agreement will detail each agency’s responsibilities regarding construction, cost allocation, ownership, and future maintenance. Ownership and maintenance of the street lighting system will transition from the City to Xcel Energy. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on November 18, 2025, to discuss the proposed 2026 reconstruction projects and preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. RIGHT-OF-WAY/ EASEMENTS: Existing roadway right-of-way for Parklawn Court is 60’. It is anticipated that this project can be constructed within the existing ROW. A portion of the in place landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $462,450 (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Street Lighting $17,600 Special Assessments Roadway $77,850 Special Assessments Roadway $113,700 Property Taxes Roadway Total: $209,150 Sanitary Sewer $21,300 Watermain $78,700 Storm Sewer $95,400 Utility Total: $195,400 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total: $57,900 PACS Fund Project Total: $462,450 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs Page 568 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 14 ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 41.5 roadway residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Parklawn Court project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $2,300, or $1,037.50 per apartment unit. (see Figure 5). The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix K. Figure 5: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map The methodology for calculating assessments per REU are as follows: There are 3 multiple unit multi-family residential properties located in the project limits that will be assessed a 0.5 REU factor per unit based on the City’s assessment policy. Table 3 shows their REU calculations based on the City’s assessment policy. Page 569 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 15 Table 3: Multiple Unit Multi-Family Residential Properties There is one multiple unit multi-family residential corner property located in the project limits that will be assessed a 0.5 REU factor per unit and partial REU due to an adjacent street that was previously assessed with the 2017 Parklawn Avenue project. Table 4 shows their REU calculations based on the City’s assessment policy. Table 4: Multiple Unit Multi-Family Residential Corner Properties PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Informational Open House August 26, 2025 ETC Engineering Study Review October 23, 2025 Receive Engineering Study December 8, 2025 Open Public Improvement Hearing December 8, 2025 Close Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2025 Public Improvement Hearing Council Decision December 16, 2025 Bid Opening March/April 2026 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2026 Complete Construction Fall 2026 Final Assessment Hearing October 2027 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2026 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure along Parklawn Court. PID Address Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU 3102824420014 4415 PARKLAWN CT Multi-Family (18 units) 1 0.5 18 x 1.0 x 0.5 = 9 3102824420015 4425 PARKLAWN CT Multi-Family (20 units) 1 0.5 20 x 1.0 x 0.5 = 10 3102824420016 4435 PARKLAWN CT Multi-Family (36 units) 1 0.5 36 x 1.0 x 0.5 = 18 PID Address Street Type of Property Proposed REU REU Factor Assessable REU 3102824420017 4456 PARKLAWN CT Multi-Family (18 units) 0.5 0.5 18 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 4.5 Page 570 of 668 Engineering Study Parklawn Court Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-467 December 1, 2025 16 APPENDIX: A. Crash Data B. Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Street Lights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H. Neighborhood Informational Presentation Materials I. Resident Questionnaire J. Correspondence from Residents K. Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 571 of 668 APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Page 572 of 668 Parklawn Court Reported Crashes 2015-2025 DateInfoCrash Type# January 2015 March 2022 Icy road condition, hit light pole Intoxicated driver hit light pole Ran off road Ran off road1 September 2023 Eastbound vehicle turn left into parking lot was hit by WB driver approaching Parklawn Ave Left turn 2 July 2021 April 2024 Parked car rear-ended Parked car rear-ended Rear-end Rear-end3 October 2026 Parked car rear-endedRear-end4 Page 573 of 668 APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Page 574 of 668 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree kNineMileCree kNine Mile Creek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use PathExisting Sidewalk Proposed Shared-Use PathProposed SidewalkProposed Twin Loops Page 575 of 668 APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map Page 576 of 668 TRACY AVEVERNON AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT ADRGLEASONRDWeberPark EdinaCommunityCenter HighlandsPark CityHall M innehahaCree k NineMileCreek Ni ne Mile Cre ek ArdenPark SouthdaleLibrary ToddPark YanceyPark Van ValkenburgPark BredesenPark PamelaPark RoslandPark Fred RichardsPark BraemarGolfCourse LewisPark PublicWorks ArnesonAcresPark EdinaHighSchool CentennialLakes LakeCornelia LakeEdina MudLake IndianheadLake ArrowheadLake MirrorLake MelodyLake BraemarArena Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4T H ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W October 2022 City of EdinaExisting and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ± 0 2,250Feet Legend Proposed CP Rail Regional TrailNine Mile Creek Regional TrailExisting Shared-Use Path Proposed Shared-Use Path Proposed Twin Loops Advisory Bike Lane Existing Bike Boulevard Bikeable ShoulderExisting Shared Bike LaneExisting Bike LaneExisting Buffered Bike Lane Proposed Bike BoulevardProposed Bike LaneProposed Buffered Bike Lane Page 577 of 668 APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks Page 578 of 668 4401 4145 440141414435 4201 4100-20 4351 7600 7625 4451 4480 44254350 4440 441542804251 4250 4456 4456 4452438042004300-2 8 7337 7401 7403 7410 7404 7400 73267328733073347332733673387340732344444446 4448 4450 4400 Project Limits PARKLAW N CTW 76TH ST PARKLAWN AVE PARKLAWN AVE/ Engineering DeptNovember 2025 Sewer Blockage and Watermain BreaksParklawn Ct Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionCITYOFEDINAMINNESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Legend Sewer Blockage Watermain Breaks Page 579 of 668 APPENDIX E Street Lights and Signs Page 580 of 668 4401 4145 440141414435 4201 4100-20 4351 7600 7625 4451 4480 44254350 4440 441542804251 4250 4456 4456 4452438042004300-2 8 7337 7401 7403 7410 7404 7400 73267328733073347332733673387340732344444446 4448 4450 4400 Project Limits PARKLAW N CTW 76TH ST PARKLAWN AVE PARKLAWN AVE/ Engineering DeptNovember 2025 Existing Street LightsParklawn Ct Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction CITYOFEDIN A MIN NESOTAINCORPORAT E D 1888 , e Existing Street Lights Page 581 of 668 89:; 89:= n£ bcdpf bcdpf 89:= bcdpf º»¼À n£ º»¼À bcdpf bcdpf !"$ n£ n£ 89:m 1238 89:; 89:= 89:m bcdpf bcdpf bcdpf 89:m bcdpf 89:= bcdpf n£n£ 89:m FGHZ bcdpf º»¼À ½¾¿ 89:z 4401 4145 440141414435 4201 4100-20 4351 7600 7625 4451 4480 44254350 4440 441542804251 4250 4456 4456 4452438042004300-2 8 7337 7401 7403 7410 7404 7400 73267328733073347332733673387340732344444446 4448 4450 4400 Project Limits PARKLAW N CTW 76TH ST PARKLAWN AVE PARKLAWN AVE/ Engineering DeptNovember 2025 Existing SignsParklawn Ct Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionCITYOFEDINAMINNESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Page 582 of 668 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Page 583 of 668 Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy Page 584 of 668 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 585 of 668 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 586 of 668 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 587 of 668 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 588 of 668 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 589 of 668 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 590 of 668 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 591 of 668 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy Page 592 of 668 APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Page 593 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room October 23, 2025 1. Call to Order Vice Chair Brown called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Bildsten, Brown, Olson, White Late: Commissioner Lassig Absent: Commissioners Lewis, Rosen, Trueger, Wright, Bracken Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni, 3. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Commissioner White to approve the September 18, 2025 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. 5. Community Comment Taylor Bruhschwein, 5744 Ewing Ave, commented on the Wooddale Ave bike lane updates between 50th St and Valley View Rd noted in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and asked the Commission to review the proposed project. Bruhschwein noted that the project has a good chance to decrease motor vehicle trips on Wooddale Ave and connect to the proposed Twin Loops facility. The corridor is close to Pamela Park, Wooddale Park, Utley Park, four schools and commercial destinations. Bruhschwein noted that the current infrastructure does not feel safe and felt that demand is there to bike if improvements were to be made. Bruhschwein also asked the Commission to be bold when reviewing the proposed reconstruction projects tonight. Commissioner Lassig arrived at 6:08. 6. Reports/Recommendations 6.1. Prospect Knolls A/C/D Reconstruction Project Senior Project Engineer Ben Jore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • Suggest including the intersection of 70th St and Antrim Rd and to consider extending the westbound bike lane to the intersection. Page 594 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 • Consider extending the sidewalk one more block north on Shannon Dr to Lee Valley to collect more walkshed. • Concerned about resident opposition at the 11th hour like the Concord reconstruction project last year. • Suggest referencing the Quality of Life Survey results at the public hearing to show support for sidewalks. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented. Motion failed for lack of a second. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to endorse the proposed improvements for the Prospect Knolls A/C/D reconstruction project as presented and to recommend additional analysis of the 70th St and Antrim Rd intersection for a potential demonstration project. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.2. Parklawn Court Reconstruction Project Graduate Engineer Chris Moore and Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • Appreciate the critical thought put into the recommendations. This sidewalk connection is a small but important link. • Suggest that lack of response from adjacent properties owners/tenants might reflect support for the project. Motion was made by Commissioner Brown and seconded by Commissioner Olson to endorse the proposed improvements for the Parklawn Court reconstruction project as presented. All voted aye. Motion carried. 6.3. South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project Staff Liaison Scipioni presented the draft engineering study for review and comment. Comments from Commissioners included: • The proposed shared-use path would be great for providing access to the future France Avenue pedestrian crossing. • Suggest considering another midblock median further west along the corridor. • Suggest constructing the proposed Wooddale Ave bike boulevard through the South Cornelia neighborhood as part of this project. • The multi-year project will be disruptive to the residents, but it will provide a good opportunity for new multi-modal facilities. 6.4. Traffic Safety Report of October 1, 2025 The Commission reviewed and commented on the staff report. Page 595 of 668 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: November 20, 2025 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 SEAT NAME 1 Wright, Grant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% 2 VACANT 3 Bildsten, Roger 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 5 Rosen, Adam 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 7 Olson, Bethany 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 8 White, Joan 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 9 VACANT 10 Lassig, Augie (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% 11 Bracken, Logan (s) 1 1 50% Page 596 of 668 APPENDIX H Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials Page 597 of 668 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 1 K: i, cA-4-40) 101A-2.f eei-AA.... 70 2„6 I frz_RF_Jr 2 ,--(Er---F G /55 EL i3e-z--e--.. Zoo ? Z-4-A/ 44 ik,1 3 -)" OLP ; 11, Uje_Ary\----c 110QQt Down Psockct 4 -pk - -, (1 -P--,,5 <- F 1 (-_) .. ... r, (( 7,00 siiin h (,-, Dv- 5 70‘...4_,,,...,t.c.„s 5----,7 ''<i o!... Ts+, 6 -Lt.Sia V) -- ,(4n gs - C 3 ki\i - 7o TI- 7 e--) 4 V \, c&)1•)te -) jcV -- 1-1M1 S- .1 (A) 3T) 8 Th(1"4- 47-ky 467-0011 ‘ oo 5 6 06frA 6-e,1.e.) 9 X / Fi-e 44 4) fte-i" 6,5-0/ * 1/a 7 D 10 ) wt Sal bik4k5i,,14‘44/242_ 1-c32,c) Slukyn&AA-CDr. 11 Ga ry -. ate,/ Icy tc-Tc/ins5c,r- .SS D/ 11;//a6e, 4.)r, 12 A/ 4.7,-, ki g_e_4e-is 1,1 1$ 13 , 20-vQ.., LOMMe_____k II -Apn __,_-\--4Th-1--c;, 14 6( r.--\-- C-1-7 1 \-1--..ct 1°2 O u - )e,,s, Cltr do _ 15 gkk.b i_.%/0„1 LAI3is 7671h KL=-_-)e__, E0,6,- 16 0,(2-1A--) C-* )3T--c, r NAL-- ---/ (2..-:' c L-e-e-1-t,/- 6 %) D4--t 17 M -A-1-1 l_,S T.- 0 -7/c4 riee/A)ddd ipri:/z 18 <-3: k ..\ ( j.x. cf 6,- -110 .c 1-(s2eh,,,d..,t Pr,-e 19 -L. ,,,-, ' nfz_t_&-s-L. /-6,, ----7 k 09 r-, ffil-LaoD -Pal 0 e- 20 fiecipte (-L©P 721-2_ I—A p(A- 7z2V /i4All--1/7(-n:x4 (5-ei/i ijA4-70 ci, or 21 1)OiLl- UPt-d0 - ALPS ( -C:9 22 t1606 ter00 i'df 7 //kat Rrib`ve 23 AoolNeAl.,e_ i\ActiAao/ 55-26 YI'llat Dr i,i t_ 24 4t,d64;126G ° g/a4 57/7 // ':- , ii4.4fAR 25 PZ--k 04,..ess _ I Lo L 1 A g,J 26 44,a f -95 ao G,&,, 7100 Poies000l DY -7`2-61r F ( (d-i .3-.& Dr. 27 /' ,- , D,A 28 -If \ (A6v a-- -l-e1152-44. ' MA La h hcon tr) 29 b-A-4-‘`-- -2Y---4)--7--)-,-- 4 Zei--/ -k,,.. 7 o o 30 7e/ < e_ IA cy-,4_14 55- Li c w_ 7o t-4 5 .r Page 1 of 4 Page 598 of 668 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 26, 2025 NAME ADDRESS 31 i.e..' -1/1 t„,t,L5 .) 07 6-11 ir ' \v‘ (-1- 32 Pc,t,,1 d c•cru 0 %laid kekket L L 33 --Iv.S.W\ Syr re- LA 1 OCI'l La eti-vt," 34 re('',0f„rby --"x),( v .,..7^ 35 Veco n t ca, er 44(w.e.V _.-Si knol 701 St.., 36 k(-1--, .\ Sai \\ a--_SA '1113 (A r-rk_cz --\" 0 6-1 37 Cr e - 70.2-e- -aannvlA Oviv-t 38 A , ( )-(4,-"J,4 ' „s ti 4,,.. 0 ,.., a ?CM, K--r '''y' 1 " 4 39 ,A eP /ArP4'L4 70/,,,,-1,.. ze, 703z.. CO ElFtet, gi) 40 (-pool, 1- At.ks4\ 0\ ert_ Pi--ers'eA 41 /44,64EL getarz_ --71/ a 24(,H~ 2,t) 42 cc AiNI --B ---( 0 (- ...,Vi, IA e vv e• 43 Rit a &\ .1v1i 1 t5 '--7 (0 a 54ovitrAeK fi t 44 (fil -S i 1((t 3 -/D5 Kunrick owe 45 494f( .4 ,74/iii 4-- 4i/ 77 )7 a/ /<2.i,,' c4 At., 46 , .b3 kik_ 1.,,,-y\iz- -lifol c-lA0.-mAN-0( -1>‘ - 47 (1 crS Q S0_,\---,c),e, ? \ cj 1 0 t \ LemVoi,\IQkf,jn 70 54— 4a.....2-Ace.._,A, 48 T-L,,_ ... -q_ yr / . 5 cP•14- 49 s--e„fr ,,t _,--,.-- ;co-., 76 ›--s- 50 CIL -e '49 ,e,.-L --C:;. 164,e_ 714 1:---4-e2t.....-J r)-- 51 COLYY1 .e Bmi&Acti 12‘co. -\.t.e'rvv'ood 1)1' 52 CASV100. ‘Q 0"\-€ C MCA_ le\ 0 12:2-I V\-Cew000l ,r 53 N\Q---k4 °L.- 1 C) ONacv‘z(-\ 4-.1". -t-es--0-ZO, 54 c_115.-7-f A, E- 1.4 _To1-1— Cloy ci.5____ 1/A-1-6Eie *1) 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 2 of 4 Page 599 of 668 EdinaMN.gov 2026 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Informational Meeting –August 26, 2025 Page 600 of 668 Agenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •Project Scopes •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Questions Page 601 of 668 Engineering - Design & Construction Division Brandon Freeman Sr. Engineering Technician Chris Moore Graduate Engineer Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer Chad Millner Director of Engineering Jon Moore Sr. Engineering Technician Tom Haataja Sr. Engineering Technician Ben Jore Sr. Project Engineer Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator Page 602 of 668 2026 Project Areas •Parklawn Court •4 Properties •Prospect Knolls A, C, &D •283 Properties Page 603 of 668 Why My Street? •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •Maximizes economics of scale •Extends pavement life •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Prioritized based on; •Pavement condition •Underground utility issues Page 604 of 668 Why Reconstruct? •Roadway originally constructed with in the 1950’s-1980’s •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) Page 605 of 668 Existing Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Some streets have curb and gutter while others do not •Some properties already have concrete driveway aprons, some do not Page 606 of 668 Existing Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains •Sanitary Sewer - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. - Inflow and infiltration •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing Page 607 of 668 What / Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically, 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey Page 608 of 668 Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way •Landscaping •Outwalks / steps •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences Page 609 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Roadways •Replacement and installation of curb & gutter •Subgrade corrections as needed •New roadbed and asphalt pavement surface Page 610 of 668 Living Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •Minimum roadway design elements •Street Width •Impacts •Cost •Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Page 611 of 668 Proposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced / installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy Page 612 of 668 Proposed Improvements - Utilities •Includes partial replacement of watermain •New service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •May include localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Lining of sanitary sewer •Storm sewer upgrades Page 613 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Installed when feasible and warranted •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website Page 614 of 668 Utility Ownership City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service Page 615 of 668 Utility Ownership •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service City Owned Utilities A –Water Service E –Water Service Shutoff Page 616 of 668 Proposed Improvements – Ped / Bike •Based on Pedestrian and Bicyclist Master Plan •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts Page 617 of 668 Private Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Fiber optic internet currently being installed •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance Page 618 of 668 Overhead Utility Poles •Resident request about burying overhead utilities •Not required by the City, nor does the City fund this •If pursued, full cost by property owners •Significant cost •Private service connection not included Page 619 of 668 What You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Localized flooding during rainfall •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain Page 620 of 668 What You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in ROW •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Construction equipment stored on streets •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) Page 621 of 668 What You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 7 days to allow driveways to cure Page 622 of 668 What You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be restored with new sod Page 623 of 668 What You Can Expect •We will; •Provide opportunities for input •Keep you informed •Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs Page 624 of 668 City Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •Sanitary sewer •Watermain Page 625 of 668 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •Sidewalks /shared-use paths •Bike lanes •Associated signage and pavement markings •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees Page 626 of 668 Do Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~23% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •~3.2% go to Public Works •Snowplowing •Pothole repairs •Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •In 2022 taxes began paying for a portion of street reconstruction Figures per proposed 2025 Edina Tax Levy (not final) Page 627 of 668 Special Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers portion of roadway costs •Roadway and driveway removals •Asphalt pavement •Driveway installation •Restoration •Indirect Costs – engineering, finance, soil investigations, mailings Page 628 of 668 Residential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties REU FactorLand Use ClassScenario 1.0Single-Family ResidentialA 0.5Multi-Family Residential –Apartment/CondosB Page 629 of 668 Project Details – Parklawn Court •4 properties (41.50 REUs) •330’ of road •Full removal and replacement of curb & gutter •Concrete roadway removed and replaced with Bituminous •Water services replacement •Sanitary Lining and local replacement •Storm sewer improvements •Potential sidewalk(s) •Street width still to be determined Page 630 of 668 Project Details – Prospect Knolls A, C, & D •283 properties (231.67 REUs) •3.20 miles of road •Installation and replacement of curb & gutter •Partial watermain and full water services replacement •Sanitary lining and localized repairs •Storm sewer improvements •24’ street width 5’ walk: •Portions of Shannon Drive, Lanham Lane •Kemrich Drive, Fleetwood Drive •Typically 27’ street width remaining streets Page 631 of 668 Proposed Utility Improvements •Install 12” watermain from West 70th Street to Gleason Road •Existing Utility Easement •Replace 6” watermain on Dublin Circle •Replace 6” watermain on Lanham Lane •Upgrade 1.5” watermain in cul-de-sacs to 6” watermain •Install 8” sanitary sewer on 70th Street Page 632 of 668 Pedestrian Facilities Plan •5’ concrete sidewalk •Shannon Drive •Kemrich Drive •Fleetwood Drive •Lanham Lane •Connection to existing Lewis Park path •Sidewalk to be maintained by adjacent property owners Page 633 of 668 Proposed: 24’ road width, one-sided parking, 5’ sidewalk (0-5’ grass boulevard) Existing: 30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – Sidewalk Streets Page 634 of 668 Existing: 26’-30’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed: 27’ road width, two-sided parking Proposed Roadway Widths – No Sidewalk Streets •27’ road width •Reduce street widths by 0-3’ •Two-sided parking to remain •Exceptions •Kerry Road •24’ width •One-sided parking •Village Drive •30’ width Page 635 of 668 Revised Roadway Cost Assessment - Local Sample Assessment During Transition $30,000$20,000$10,000% of Local Roadway Costs Assessed Construction Year $30,000$20,000$10,000100%2020 $23,670- $17,358 $15,780- $11,572 $7,890- $5,78678.90%-57.86%2021-2025 $15,780$10,520$5,26052.60%2026 $14,202-$1,578$9,468-$1,052$4,734-$52647.34%-5.26%2027-2035 $0$0$00%2036 Page 636 of 668 •Special assessments are valid if; •The assessment does not exceed the special benefit measured by the increase in market value due to the improvement. •Licensed and Qualified Appraisal Firm Market Benefit Estimate Page 637 of 668 Assessments Districts – Prospect Knolls •Disparity in potential benefit •3 Separate Districts Page 638 of 668 Preliminary Assessments – Prospect Knolls & Parklawn Ct *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) SY of Paving per REU Square Yards of Paving # of REUs Estimated Assessment Range per REU* % of Roadway Costs Assessed NeighborhoodYear -------Prospect Knolls A/C/D2026 328.119,25058.67$21,500 -$16,200 52.60%District 1 2026 161.424,692153$10,900 -$8,200 52.60%District 22026 66.01,32120$3,800 -$2,900 52.60%District 32026 29.41,22141.5$2,400-$1,80057.86%Parklawn Court2026 120.935,250291.6$11,500 -$7,500 57.86%Presidents A/B2025 175.230,568174.49$17,100 -$11,900 63.12%Concord B/C 2024 Page 639 of 668 Typical Project Timeline MilestoneDate Engineering studies/estimates providedJuly –September 2025 Public hearingsDecember 2025 Plan preparation and biddingJanuary – March 2026 Construction beginsApril – May 2026 Construction concludesOctober – November 2026 Warranty work2027 Final assessment hearingFall 2027 Page 640 of 668 Assessment Timing MilestoneDate Initial Public HearingsDecember 2025 Project ConstructedSummer 2026 Final Assessment HearingOctober 2027 Assessment Filed with CountyNovember 2027 Assessment on Tax StatementJanuary 2028 Page 641 of 668 Payment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid interest charges •Pay min. 25% ; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •2024 interest rate was 4.69% •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older and meet specific income requirements •Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 Page 642 of 668 Communication •Regular Mail •All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires •Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers •Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, concrete, temporary inaccessibility) •Better Together Edina – City Website Project Page Page 643 of 668 Better Together Edina •Best way to stay informed •www.bettertogether edina.org •Free, access to periodic updates on project progress and schedules Page 644 of 668 Providing Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •Traffic/pedestrian issues •Street drainage issues •Streetlight upgrades •Public hearing in December 2025 •Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns Page 645 of 668 Questionnaire Results Responses Received to DateNeighborhood 26% (74 / 283)Prospect Knolls 25% (1 / 4)Parklawn Court Page 646 of 668 How To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Review Better Together Edina updates •Ask questions, stay informed Page 647 of 668 Contact Us Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Aaron Ditzler Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 ADitzler@edinamn.gov Page 648 of 668 Questions? •Ask questions on Better Together Edina Q&A page •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/prospect-knolls •https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/parklawn-court •Call or email Page 649 of 668 Thank you for your time! Page 650 of 668 APPENDIX I Resident Questionnaires Page 651 of 668 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 24 August 2025 Neighborhood Reconstruction Survey Better Together Edina Project: Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction VISITORS 10 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Page 652 of 668 Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 25, 2025 03:32:19 am Last Seen:Jul 25, 2025 10:24:55 am Q1.Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, backyard drain, nuisance sump pump, etc. No Q2.Please comment on the location and types of problems you have. not answered Q3.How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? Not Concerned Q4.If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. not answered Q5.How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? Not Concerned Q6.If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. not answered Q7.How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Excludes speed and traffic volumes. Examples of poor motorist behavior include rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively) Not Concerned Q8.If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) of concern and why you feel that way. not answered Q9.In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: not answered Q10.Do you feel any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? No Q11.Which intersection do you feel is unsafe? not answered Q12.Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) not answered Q13.In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: not answered Page 653 of 668 Q14.How frequently do you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood? Never Q15.If you walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q16.If you don't walk, jog, or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your walking, jogging, or running? Please list all that you can think of. This is already a very safe area, and if I had any desire to get out of my apartment I would feel comfortable doing so Q17.How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Never Q18.If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) not answered Q19.If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what reconstruction improvement might increase your bicycle riding frequency? Please list all that you can think of. not answered Q20.How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Never Q21.How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Rarely (less than once per month) Q22.How satisfied are you with the availability of on- street parking in your neighborhood? Satisfied Q23.Any additional comments about parking? not answered Q24.Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. There are no issues with the Parklawn CT area Q25.Do you support the installation of a sidewalk on: Neither side Q26.Please describe any specific concerns or support you have regarding sidewalks on your street. not answered Q27.How many vehicles are typically parked on Parklawn Ct (daily)? 3 vehicles Q28.How often do you or your household rely on on- street parking? Never Page 654 of 668 Q29.Do you have off-street parking available (e.g., parking lot, garage)? Yes Q30.If on-street parking were reduced or restricted due to new sidewalk installation, how would that impact you? Significant impact Q31.Please elaborate if you have specific concerns regarding parking. The street parking currently allows just enough room to move through safely. Installing even just 1 sidewalk would make the street too narrow. Q32.What is your address?4435 Parklawn CT, Edina, MN 55435 Page 655 of 668 APPENDIX J Correspondence from Residents Page 656 of 668 Page 657 of 668 4 From:Reid Sent:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 1:46 PM To:Liz Moore Cc:Aaron Ditzler Subject:Re: Parklawn Court Reconstruction 2026 EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I'll send an email out to notify them tomorrow. Best, This email is confidential and only for the use of its addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us and delete this message, and attachments if any. Email communications are not secure and therefore we do not accept any responsibility for the confidentiality or unaltered contents of this message. From: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 10:05 AM To: Reid Cc: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Parklawn Court Reconstruction 2026 Good Morning, Reid! We are planning to have an open house for residents of Parklawn Court. Can you share this information with them? “Parklawn Court is scheduled for reconstruction in 2026. Please plan to attend an informational meeting on Tuesday, August 26 at Edina Public Works and Park Maintenance Family, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina from 6-8 pm. There will be a presentation at 6:15pm and you will learn how projects are funded (special assessments, etc), recommended sidewalk locations, typical construction timeline, how you will be impacted, how you can prepare and more. If you cannot attend the meeting, the information will be posted in September on our Better Together Edina page at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/parklawn-court. If you have any questions, please contact Assistant City Engineer Aaron Ditzler at ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov or 952- 826-0443.” Thank you, Page 658 of 668 5 Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Liz Moore Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 3:16 PM To: Reid Cc: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Parklawn Court Reconstruction 2026 [Filed 17 Jul 2025 06:57] Sounds good, thank you for your help! Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Reid Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 3:13 PM To: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: Parklawn Court Reconstruction 2026 EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. No, not yet. We are planning on sliding a mailer under doors and sending out a mass email this week. Best, This email is confidential and only for the use of its addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us and delete this message, and attachments if any. Email communications are not secure and therefore we do not accept any responsibility for the confidentiality or unaltered contents of this message. From: Liz Moore <LMoore@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 3:08 PM To: Reid Cc: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Parklawn Court Reconstruction 2026 Hi, Reid. Were you able to share this with the residents? We haven’t received any feedback on our survey. Page 659 of 668 6 Thanks, Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Liz Moore Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 2:41 PM To: Cc: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Parklawn Court Reconstruction 2026 [Filed 25 Jun 2025 14:41] Reid – see attached links! Thank you for your help. Let me know if you have any questions. Survey: https://bit.ly/ParklawnCourt Project Page: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/parklawn-court Liz Moore, Engineering Admin Coordinator 952-826-0449 | Fax 952-826-0392 7450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439 LMoore@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. Page 660 of 668 APPENDIX K Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 661 of 668 PARKLAWN CT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Row PID ADDRESS STREET OWNER ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSABLE AMOUNT 1 3102824420014 4415 Parklawn Ct AKINS EDINA VILLA LLC 9 20,700.00$ 2 3102824420015 4425 Parklawn Ct EDINA PARK APARTMENTS LLC 10 23,000.00$ 3 3102824420016 4435 Parklawn Ct AKINS 4435 PARKLAWN CT LLC 18 41,400.00$ 4 3102824420017 4456 Parklawn Ct AKINS PARKLAWN CT LLC 4.5 10,350.00$ TOTAL 37.00 85,100.00$ Page 662 of 668 WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 26th • • 1 hare Allison, City Clerk v. 2025. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates November 26, 2025, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. BA-467 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS Page 663 of 668 November 25, 2025 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall on Monday, Dec. 8, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2026 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2027. The estimated roadway cost is $95,450 and is funded by special assessment. The estimated cumulative cost for 4415, 4425 and 4456 Parklawn Court is $72,450.00. The assessment can be divided over a fifteen-year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed roadway improvements includes all properties between and including 4415, 4425, 4435, and 4456 Parklawn Court. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Staff’s recommendations to City Council are: • Parklawn Court reconstructed to 27’ wide, including parking on the south side only, and a 5’ sidewalk on both sides. • Parklawn Court cul-de-sac bulb reconstructed to 80-feet diameter with no parking. • New concrete curb and gutter and new asphalt pavement • Full replacement of water services, hydrants and valves • Storm sewer improvements to resolve local drainages issues and installation of sump drains where feasible • Spot repairs and structural lining of the sanitary sewer main Address Type of Property Proposed Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) REU Factor Assessable REU Assessment per REU Assessment Calculation 4415 Parklawn Ct Multi-Family (18 units) 1 0.5 18 x 1.0 x 0.5 = 9 $2,300 9 x $2,300 = $20,700 4435 Parklawn Ct Multi-Family (36 units) 1 0.5 36 x 1.0 x 0.5 = 18 $2,300 18 x $2,300 = $41,400 4456 Parklawn Ct Multi-Family (18 units) 0.5 0.5 18 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 4.5 $2,300 4.5 x $2,300 = $10,350 Page 664 of 668 The Engineering Study will be available online as part of the Dec. 8 City Council meeting agenda at https://edinamn.portal.civicclerk.com; under Event Categories select City Council Meeting, click Search and you will see the Dec. 8 Agenda. Page 665 of 668 November 25, 2025 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall on Monday, Dec. 8, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2026 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2027. The estimated roadway cost is $95,450.00 and is funded by special assessment. The estimated cost for 4425 Parklawn Court is $23,000.00. The assessment can be divided over a fifteen-year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed roadway improvements includes all properties between and including 4415, 4425, 4435, and 4456 Parklawn Court. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Staff’s recommendations to City Council are: • Parklawn Court reconstructed to 27’ wide, including parking on the south side only, and a 5’ sidewalk on both sides. • Parklawn Court cul-de-sac bulb reconstructed to 80-feet diameter with no parking. • New concrete curb and gutter and new asphalt pavement • Full replacement of water services, hydrants and valves • Storm sewer improvements to resolve local drainages issues and installation of sump drains where feasible • Spot repairs and structural lining of the sanitary sewer main The Engineering Study will be available online as part of the Dec. 8 City Council meeting agenda at https://edinamn.portal.civicclerk.com; under Event Categories select City Council Meeting, click Search and you will see the Dec. 8 Agenda. Address Type of Property Proposed Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) REU Factor Assessable REU Assessment per REU Assessment Calculation 4425 Parklawn Ct Multi-Family (20 units) 1 0.5 20 x 1.0 x 0.5 = 10 $2,300 10 x $2,300 = $23,000 Page 666 of 668 Mail to Address City State Zip Physical Address Akins Parklawn Ct LLC 5416 W 70th St, #8 Edina, MN 55439 4415, 4435, and 4456 Parklawn Ct Edina Park Apartments 5290 Villa Way Edina, MN 55436 4425 Parklawn Ct Page 667 of 668 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-117 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA-467 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of November 2025, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA-467, the proposed improvement of Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weekly published notices of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of December 2025, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: December 16, 2025 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 16, 2025, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Page 668 of 668