Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026-01-20 City Council Meeting Packet
City Council Meeting Agenda January 20, 2026, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall, Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. Participate in the meeting: Watch the meeting on cable TV or YouTube.com/EdinaTV. Provide feedback during Community Comment by calling 312-535-8110. Enter access code 2862 532 7726. Password is 5454. Press *3 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A staff member will unmute you when it is your turn to speak. Accessibility Support: The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approval of Meeting Agenda 5. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. 5.1. City Manager's Response to Community Comments 6. Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable roll call vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) 6.1. Minutes: Work Session and Regular for Dec. 8, 16, 2025, and Jan. 6, 2026 Page 1 of 746 6.2. Payment of Claims 6.3. Purchase Request: Annual LOGIS Services 6.4. Purchase Request: 2026 Computer Replacements 6.5. Purchase Request: Annual Card Access and Security Camera Agreements 6.6. Ordinance 2026-01: Setting Morningside Water Rates 6.7. Resolution 2026-01 : Amending the Budget for the City of Edina for Year 2026 6.8. Purchase Request: Change Order #1: Home Energy Squad Contract 6.9. Purchase Request: Ariel Lift 6.10. Resolution 2026-03: Supporting the Dissolution of the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition 6.11. Purchase Request: Rave Contract Renewal 6.12. CHS-1 Shared/Hosted Phone Contract Amendments 6.13. Purchase Request: Ford Explorer Police Interceptor 6.14. Amendment to Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services Agreement with City of Bloomington 6.15. Purchase Request: Project Dox Software Subscription 6.16. Purchase Request: Blue Peak Consulting Mental Health Provider Renewal 6.17. Resolution 2026-04: Authorizing Approval of the 2026-2028 Residential Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Agreement with Hennepin County 6.18. 2026-2027 City and Local 49ers Union Contract 6.19. 2026-2027 City and Local 292 Electricians Union Contract 6.20. Summary Publication for Ordinances 2025-16, 2025-18 and 2025-19 7. Special Recognitions and Presentations Page 2 of 746 7.1. Edina Football State Championship Recognition 7.2. Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 26-30, 2026 8. Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staff and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an efficient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. 8.1. Conditional Use Permit with Variances: 4201 W. 50th St. 9. Reports/Recommendations 9.1. Resolution 2026-02: Accepting Donations 9.2. Presentation on Braemar Ice Arena Concept Plan 9.3. Ordinance 2025-17: Amending Chapter 22 - Miscellaneous Offenses to add Article XI. - Firearms 9.4. Ordinance 2026-02: Amending Section 4-9-9; Repealing and Replacing Chapter 6 Article III Lawful Gambling of the Edina City Code 9.5. Sketch Plan Review: 6016 Vernon Avenue (EV Charging Station) 9.6. Adopt 2026 Legislative Platforms 9.7. Resolution 2026-05: Approving the Proposed Local Sales Tax Question and Authorizing an Election thereon during the 2026 General Election 10. Manager's Comments 11. Mayor and Council Comments 11.1. Discuss City Response to Current Federal Immigration Enforcement Action 12. Adjournment Page 3 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 5.1 Department: Administration Item Activity: Information Prepared By: Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk Item Title: City Manager's Response to Community Comments Action Requested: None, information only. Information/Background: Responses to questions posed during Community Comment at the last meeting were posted on the City's website (URL). City Manager Neal will provide summaries of those responses during the meeting. Supporting Documentation: None Page 4 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.1 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Title: Minutes: Work Session and Regular for Dec. 8, 16, 2025, and Jan. 6, 2026 Action Requested: Approve the minutes as presented. Information/Background: N/A Supporting Documentation: 1. Minutes: Dec. 8, 2025, Regular 2. Minutes: Dec. 16, 2025, Work Session 3. Minutes: Dec. 16, 2025, Regular 4. Minutes: Jan. 6, 2026, Townhall Page 5 of 746 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 8, 2025 6:00 P.M. I.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2.0 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Risser, and Hovland. Absent: Member Pierce. 3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.0 MEETING AGENDA – APPROVED The Council asked for clarification on why there is no Community Comment at this meeting. City Manager Neal stated that this meeting was for a specific topic, and the Community Comment has not been advertised as part of this meeting. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 5.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. 5.1. RESOLUTION 2025-118, WEST 72ND STREET ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-538 – CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 16, 2025 City Engineer Millner gave a presentation regarding the three public hearings on tonight’s agenda, including information on infrastructure spending, pavement condition index, utility infrastructure, and infrastructure asset management. Assistant City Engineer Ditzler gave a presentation highlighting the 2026 project areas, reasoning behind these three projects, proposed water main improvements, proposed sanitary sewer improvements, proposed storm sewer improvements, right-of-way impacts, project schedules, special assessments, residential equivalent units, market benefit estimate, and payment options. The Council asked questions regarding how Parklawn meets its goals for efficiencies, how the curbs work, and how REUs are calculated on corner lots. Mr. Ditzler stated that corner lots essentially get half off and are assessed 0.5 REUs. Transportation Planner Scipioni gave a presentation on strategic guidance, guiding objectives, quality of life survey 2025, Safe & Equitable Mobility Action Plan, and proposed improvements. Mr. Millner gave a presentation focusing on the W 72nd Street Roadway Reconstruction, including South Trunk Sanitary Sewer Improvements, opportunity to reconstruct, project details, proposed utility improvements - open cut method, existing roadways conditions, roadway typical section, Transportation Commission review, estimated project costs, estimated roadway assessments, and the staff recommendation. Page 6 of 746 Page 2 The Council asked questions regarding why there are not many medians in the City, how to protect the sidewalk on the North side, surmountable vs. barrier curbs, Mr. Millner noted that medians help with traffic calming, but the challenge is snowplowing, so it is not done all the time. Mr. Millner also stated that barrier curbs are their standard and that is what they are proposing. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 6:53 p.m. Public Testimony Sandy Carlson addressed the Council. Neil Johnson addressed the Council. Myriam Trepanier addressed the Council. Alice Hulbert addressed the Council. Ted Carlson addressed the Council. Krissy Sommerstad addressed the Council. The Council asked questions regarding tree canopy preservation, increasing lighting at the South corner, traffic in and out of the apartment building, speed bumps/humps, signage, and the plan to ensure people can cross the street safely to the multi-use path. Mr. Millner noted that they try to save as many trees as possible, and stated that cyclists and pedestrians can use the 5-foot sidewalk or the 8-foot sidewalk, depending on their desire. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the in-person public hearing, keep public comment open until Sunday, December 10, and continue action to consider approval of the West 72nd Street Roadway Reconstruction, to the December 16, 2025, City Council meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 5.2. RESOLUTION 2025-116, PROSPECT KNOLLS A, C, & D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 - CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 16, 2025 Senior Project Engineer Jore gave a presentation on the project details for Prospect Knolls A, C, and D, proposed water main improvements, proposed sanitary sewer improvements, existing roadway conditions, proposed roadway improvements, roadway typical section, existing multi- modal facilities, recommended pedestrian facilities, proposed pedestrian facilities, existing amenities, and sidewalk streets. Transportation Commission Chair Lewis stated that their recommendations are based on their desire to see a complete and connected network in the City. The Council asked questions regarding having a marked crosswalk, demonstration projects, and the reconstruction cycle. Mr. Scipioni stated that there are several grants out there that they could apply for if they wanted to do a stand-alone pedestrian and bike project separate from a roadway reconstruction project. Page 7 of 746 Page 3 The Council expressed concerns regarding the 6.5-foot drive aisle lane and the conditions on the roads from Cahill to 70th Street. Mr. Millner stated that there will not be a striped line for parking on both sides of the no-sidewalk streets. Mr. Scipioni discussed the petition against sidewalks on Fleetwood Drive and Lanham Lane. The Council expressed concerns regarding the steep driveways. Mr. Scipioni stated that they can try to hold the slope of the driveways to what it is now by narrowing the road and pushing the impacts onto the east side. Mr. Jore discussed what they can tweak at the construction level to help with the steep driveways while also keeping ADA requirements. Mr. Ditzler presented the estimated project costs, market benefit estimate, assessment districts, estimated roadway assessments for Districts 1, 2, and 3, and the staff recommendation. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. Public Testimony John Elliott addressed the Council. Cristina Notermann addressed the Council. Nick Dalbec addressed the Council. John Kortebein addressed the Council. Melissa Cohen addressed the Council. John Brutlag addressed the Council. Anna Jenks addressed the Council. Alice Hulbert addressed the Council. John Uecker addressed the Council. Ryan Breisach addressed the Council. Matt Melsen addressed the Council. Jeff Gisselbeck addressed the Council. Taylor Brushwein addressed the Council. The Council asked questions regarding how much time staff spend on-site walking the streets and talking to neighbors, experiences in other neighborhoods getting larger trucks through narrower streets, narrowing curvy streets, why other streets were ruled out as an option for the sidewalk, and retaining walls. Mr. Millner noted that the Fire Department has been a part of the street review and the development of the street standards, and there have been no issues. Mr. Jore stated that all streets that have proposed sidewalks are 27.5 feet from curb to curb. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the in-person public hearing, keep public comment open until Sunday, December 10, and continue Page 8 of 746 Page 4 action to consider approval of the Prospect Knolls A, C, & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, to the December 16, 2025, City Council meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 5.3. RESOLUTION 2025-117, PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 - CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 16, 2025 Graduate Engineer Moore presented the project details for Parklawn Court, existing roadway conditions, existing multi-modal facilities, proposed improvements, roadway typical section, estimated project costs, estimated roadway assessments, market benefit estimate, and staff recommendation. The Council asked questions regarding how policy works with apartments vs. homes and why only Parklawn Court is being done. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:25 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the in-person public hearing, keep public comment open until Sunday, December 10, and continue action to consider approval of the Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, to the December 16, 2025, City Council meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 6.0 MANAGER’S COMMENTS Received 7.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS Received 8.0 ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to adjourn the meeting at 9:34 p.m. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 20, 2026. Video Copy of the December 8, 2025, meeting available. Page 9 of 746 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2025 5:30 P.M. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. 2.0 ROLL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Ari Lenz, Assistant City Manager; Pa Thao, Finance Director; Fire Chief Andrew Slama; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Zoe Johnson, City Management Fellow; Jake Miller, IT Specialist; Steve Peckham, Project Communications Coordinator; and Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk. 3.1 2026-2027 BUDGET DISCUSSION Council and staff continued the budget discussion on reducing the overall general levy, the process for budgets in the future, completing a staffing study, keeping the human services budget, staffing six firefighters and then reevaluating during the year, and reached a consensus to go forward with the proposed. 3.2 2026 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORMS Council discussed legislative priorities and the involvement of the public and how we promote these priorities to residents. Council reviewed the draft list of priorities and discussed sales tax spending authority, and the removal of the France underpass from the priority list. Council decided to move the decision and discussion to the Jan. 20 meeting. 4.0 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 20, 2025. Audio copy of the work session available. Page 10 of 746 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 16, 2025 7:00 P.M. I.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2.0 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Hovland. 3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.0 MEETING AGENDA – APPROVED The Council recommended that item 6 and item 7 be switched, and also recommended that Item 6.30 on the Consent Agenda be tabled until the January 20, 2026 City Council Meeting. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, tabling item 6.30, Adopt Legislative Platforms, to the January 20, 2026, City Council Meeting. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving the meeting agenda as amended to switch items 6, Consent Agenda, and item 7, Special Recognitions and Presentations. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 5.0 COMMUNITY COMMENT Ralph Zickert discussed the Council’s approval of the proposed 2026 budget and how it does not reflect the claim that Edina’s tax burden is $5 million lighter. David Frankel stated that he is upset that he has not received a response from the City regarding the Braemar Arena. Mr. Frankel asked why the work being done at the South Arena has not been posted anywhere on the City website. Mr. Frankel asked if they have looked into purchasing ice time from other arenas in the area. 5.1. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS City Manager Neal responded to Community Comments from current and past meetings. 6.0 CONSENT AGENDA – ADOPTED Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item 6.10, Receive Petition for Stop Controls at Brookview Avenue and W 55th Street, Item 6.14, Request for Purchase: Kojetin Park Playground Equipment, Item 6.15, Request for Purchase: Braemar Arena South Rink Temporary Chiller Rental and Installation, and Item 6.29, Approve Out-of-State Travel for Mayor Hovland, as follows: 6.1. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of December 2, 2025 6.2. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Pre-List Dated November 26, 2025, totaling $1,912,937.06, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated November 28, 2025, totaling $439,222.96, and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated December 5, 2025, totaling $3,225,132.48 Page 11 of 746 Page 2 6.3. Request for Purchase, Public Works Gender Neutral Restroom, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, MIC Services, LLC at $15,514.62 6.4. Request for Purchase, Change Order: Project FC24-24 ADA Ped Ramp Modifications, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, New Look Contracting at $25,672 6.5. Request for Purchase, Change Order: ENG 24-3 Southdale B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, New Look Contracting at $482,020.25 6.6. Request for Purchase, Contract SP2-21 for Aquatic Center Shade Structure Solar PV System, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Apadana Energy, LLC at $95,000 6.7. Noise Wall Ballot for Highway 62 Noise Wall between W 62nd Street and Valley View Road 6.8. Agreement No. PW 60-11-25 with Hennepin County for Pedestrian Crossing Beacon Maintenance 6.9. Adopt Resolution 2025-127, approving Parking Restrictions 6.10. Receive Petition for Stop Controls at Brookview Avenue and W 55th Street 6.11. Request for Purchase, Rehabilitation of Well 7, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Thein Well Company, for up to $80,000 6.12. Request for Purchase, Rehabilitation of Well 20, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Thein Well Company, for up to $80,000 6.13. Request for Purchase, MN-Task Force 1 Rope Rescue Equipment, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Multiple Sources at $86,967.30 6.14. Request for Purchase, Kojetin Park Playground Equipment, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Playpower LT at $190,594.92 6.15. Request for Purchase, Braemar Arena South Rink Temporary Chiller Rental and Installation, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Total Mechanical Services, Inc. & Veteran Electric at $280,471.95 6.16. Adopt Resolution 2025-126, approving a Grant Agreement for the Livable Communities Act Policy Development Grant Program 6.17. Grant Second Reading Ordinance No. 2025-16, amending Chapter 2 of the City Code Setting Fees for 2026 6.18. 2026 Days of Significance 6.19. Waive Second Reading, Adopting Ordinance No. 2025-19: Amending Chapter 2, Article III. Boards, Committees, and Commissions 6.20. Waive Second Reading, Adopting Ordinance No 2025-18: Amending Chapter 4 Alcoholic Beverages 6.21. Annual Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector 6.22. Adopt Resolution 2025-119, designating Polling Place Locations 6.23. Adopt Resolution 2025-120, designating Official Newspaper for 2026 6.24. Adopt Resolution 2025-121, Signatory Resolution 6.25. Adopt Resolution 2025-122, designating Official Depositories 6.26. Adopt Resolution 2025-123, designation of Director and Alternate Director of LOGIS 6.27. Adopt Resolution 2025-124, designating Director and Alternate Director of Suburban Rate Authority 6.28. Adopt Resolution 2025-125, authorizing Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials 6.29. Out-of-State Travel for Mayor Hovland 6.30. 2026 Legislative Platforms 6.31. Renewal of Government Relations Services Contract with Messerli and Kramer, P.A. Page 12 of 746 Page 3 Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 6.10. RECEIVE PETITION FOR STOP CONTROLS AT BROOKVIEW AVENUE AND W 55TH STREET - APPROVED The Council asked questions regarding when this will come to the Council and raised concerns regarding aligning residents’ concerns with safety/engineering standards in a timely manner. Chad Miller, Engineering Director, noted that it will be a few months before this comes to the City Council because it must go through a couple of other places first. Member Risser made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to receive the Petition for Stop Controls at Brookview Avenue and W 55th Street. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 6.14. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, KOJETIN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - APPROVED The Council asked for clarification on why this is a needed replacement. Parks and Recreation Director Vetter outlined the playground equipment replacement schedule and why the equipment at Kojetin Park Playground needs replacement from a health and safety standpoint. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving Request for Purchase, Kojetin Park Playground Equipment, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Playpower LT at $190,594.92. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 6.15. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, BRAEMAR ARENA SOUTH RINK TEMPORARY CHILLER RENTAL AND INSTALLATION - APPROVED The Council asked questions regarding where this funding is coming from. City Attorney Kendall noted that there seemed to be money available in the Arena’s operating fund, and State Statute is not being violated. Councilmember Risser noted that she will be abstaining because she needs more information. Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, approving Request for Purchase, Braemar Arena South Rink Temporary Chiller Rental and Installation, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Total Mechanical Services, Inc. & Veteran Electric at $280,471.95. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Hovland. Abstain: Risser. Motion carried. 6.29. OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR MAYOR HOVLAND - APPROVED The Council discussed the policy that outlines Staff/Council travel and noted the reason why the Mayor will be attending the Conference of Mayors. Mayor Hovland noted that he will be abstaining due to a conflict of interest. Page 13 of 746 Page 4 Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving Out-of- State Travel for Mayor Hovland. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser. Abstain: Hovland. Motion carried. 7.0 SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS This item was considered prior to Agenda Item 6.0. 7.1. TREE RECOGNITION CAMPAIGN AWARDS – RECOGNIZED Hilda Martinez Salgado, Energy and Environment Commissioner, presented the 11 trees recognized for award and the four honorable mentions. 7.2. CLIMATE ACTION PLAN WORK PLAN UPDATE – PRESENTED Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager, presented an update on the Climate Action Plan, including information regarding their goals, Implementation Work Plan update, review of the entire Climate Action Plan actions, what they learned, 2026-2030 Implementation Work Plan, and what they are looking forward to. The Council asked questions regarding communication with consultants/staff who are updating the zoning Code and how to respond to streamlining the zoning process that is happening in the legislature. 7.3. CITIZEN AWARD PRESENTATION – PRESENTED Ryan Schultz, Police Lieutenant, recognized Susan and James Bizal for their courageous and selfless actions in a motor vehicle crash last year that saved the life of the driver and presented them with a Citizen Award. 8.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. 8.1. NEW ON-SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES FOR NOMA HI FI LLC DBA NOMA HI FI - APPROVED Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk, noted that NoMa Hi Fi has applied for an On-Sale Intoxicating and a Sunday sale liquor license. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Daniel del Prado, NoMa Hi Fi Owner, stated that it is a listening cocktail bar, similar to what you see in Tokyo. Mr. del Prado noted that it will be for events and have a partnership with his restaurant. Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve New On- Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor License for NoMa Hi Fi LLC dba NoMa Hi Fi Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 9.0 REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1. RESOLUTION 2025-128 ACCEPTING DONATIONS – ADOPTED Page 14 of 746 Page 5 Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2025-128 accepting various grants and donations. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 9.2. RESOLUTION 2025-112, SETTING 2026 TAX LEVY AND ADOPTING OPERATING BUDGET – ADOPTED Finance Director Thao gave a presentation including information on the 2026-2027 Levy & Budget highlights, proposed tax levy of 7.94%, and the updated 2026-2027 Preliminary tax levy proposal. The Council thanked City staff for their hard work on this. The Council discussed the reasoning behind each element that caused the 7.94% increase in the City’s tax levy, the historic costs that have been absorbed, the street reconstruction projects that are needed, and being more capable of responding to residents’ concerns. The Council expressed concerns about funding the pump at the Aquatic Center and the temporary chiller for the Braemar Ice Arena. The Council presented information on Edina’s Housing Affordability, including median home values, median household income, and discussed the ability of residents who are on a fixed income to be able to stay in their houses. The Council recommended finding a metric where they can anchor their levy growth on resident affordability. The Council noted that they are combining their Public Works and Engineering Department, consolidating staff for liquor store operations, moving Assessing to the County, and the other decisions they have made for cost-savings. The Council discussed County and State-wide budget averages, the positive marks they receive from the Quality of Life survey, key factors driving the increase in the budget, the post-COVID environment, and addressed comments on the South Arena at Braemar. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2025-112, Setting 2026 Tax Levy and Adopting Operating Budget. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 9.3. RESOLUTION 2025-118, WEST 72ND STREET ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-538 – ADOPTED Engineering Director Millner discussed the proposed roadway reconstruction project and assessment on 72nd Street and outlined the public input received. Member Pierce introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2025-112, West 72nd Street Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. SS-538. Member Jackson seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 9.4. RESOLUTION 2025-116, PROSPECT KNOLLS A, C, & D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-458 – ADOPTED Page 15 of 746 Page 6 Engineering Director Millner discussed the proposed roadway reconstruction project and assessment in the Prospect Knolls A, C & D Neighborhood and presented the proposed street widths. The Council gave feedback and discussed removing the sidewalks on Lanam Lane, Fleetwood Drive, Shannon Drive, and Kemrich Drive. Member Agnew introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2025-116, Prospect Knolls A, C & D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-458 removing all the sidewalks in the project area. Member Jackson seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 9.5. RESOLUTION 2025-117, PARKLAWN COURT NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-467 – ADOPTED Engineering Director Millner discussed the proposed roadway reconstruction project in the Parklawn Court Neighborhood. Member Risser introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2025-117, Parklawn Court Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-467. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 10.0 MANAGER’S COMMENTS Received 11.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS Received Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to approve the statement Supporting Somali Americans in Our Community. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 12.0 ADJOURNMENT Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to adjourn the meeting at 10:08 p.m. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 6, 2026. Video Copy of the December 16, 2025, meeting available. Page 16 of 746 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE TOWNHALL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 6, 2026 6:00 P.M. I.0 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. 2.0 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Hovland. 3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.0 MEETING AGENDA – APPROVED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Agnew, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. 5.0 MEETING TOPICS 5.1. PROPOSED FIREARM SAFETY AND SAFE STORAGE ORDINANCE Mayor Hovland explained the protocols for providing testimonies. 5.1.A ORDINANCE 2025-17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE TO CREATE A NEW ARTICLE XI CONCERNING FIREARMS Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing and the following individuals addressed the Council. Public Testimony Ron Kalielop Dave Wright Sarah Paisley Bob Elmore Jeff Sartain Doug Bakker Erin Zamoff Dan Nye Grace Verbrugge David Buyse Karen Bertulli Janey Westin Kerry Aikman Tess Rada Kathy Reilly Anne Whitty Katie Najjar Stephen Sanger Bill Kaemmerer Kirk Aadalen Colleen Feige Joy Dunna Michael Orange Jae Kim Dianne Blake Julia Heneghan Sarah Prebil Gabriella Olson Trish Valusek Wayne Carlson James Westin Danneka Halverson David Lose Julie Greene Tony Graham Corey Hickner-Johnson Laura Thrane Reamonn Stynes Emily Thorson Jenifer McCormick 6.0 ADJOURNMENT Member Agnew made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to adjourn the meeting at 8:19 p.m. Ayes: Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, Hovland. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 17 of 746 Page 2 Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 20, 2026. Video Copy of the January 6, 2026, meeting available. Page 18 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.2 Department: Finance Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Pa Thao, Finance Director Item Title: Payment of Claims Action Requested: Approve claims for payment. Information/Background: For security purposes and to meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL), the detailed claims reports are not included in the public packet but they are available to City Council through a secure Board Portal. To request the claims reports, please submit a data request (URL). List of Payment Claims: 1. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 12.12.2025 Total $4,039,491.36 2. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 12.19.2025 Total $4,029,962.31 3. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 12.24.2025 Total $1,401,395.33 4. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 01.02.2026 Total $1,288,036.98 5. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 01.09.2026 Total $1,489,306.77 Page 19 of 746 Page 20 of 746 Page 21 of 746 Page 22 of 746 Page 23 of 746 Page 24 of 746 Page 25 of 746 Page 26 of 746 Page 27 of 746 Page 28 of 746 Page 29 of 746 Page 30 of 746 Page 31 of 746 Page 32 of 746 Page 33 of 746 Page 34 of 746 Page 35 of 746 Page 36 of 746 Page 37 of 746 Page 38 of 746 Page 39 of 746 Page 40 of 746 Page 41 of 746 Page 42 of 746 Page 43 of 746 Page 44 of 746 Page 45 of 746 Page 46 of 746 Page 47 of 746 Page 48 of 746 Page 49 of 746 Page 50 of 746 Page 51 of 746 Page 52 of 746 Page 53 of 746 Page 54 of 746 Page 55 of 746 Page 56 of 746 Page 57 of 746 Page 58 of 746 Page 59 of 746 Page 60 of 746 Page 61 of 746 Page 62 of 746 Page 63 of 746 Page 64 of 746 Page 65 of 746 Page 66 of 746 Page 67 of 746 Page 68 of 746 Page 69 of 746 Page 70 of 746 Page 71 of 746 Page 72 of 746 Page 73 of 746 Page 74 of 746 Page 75 of 746 Page 76 of 746 Page 77 of 746 Page 78 of 746 Page 79 of 746 Page 80 of 746 Page 81 of 746 Page 82 of 746 Page 83 of 746 Page 84 of 746 Page 85 of 746 Page 86 of 746 Page 87 of 746 Page 88 of 746 Page 89 of 746 Page 90 of 746 Page 91 of 746 Page 92 of 746 Page 93 of 746 Page 94 of 746 Page 95 of 746 Page 96 of 746 Page 97 of 746 Page 98 of 746 Page 99 of 746 Page 100 of 746 Page 101 of 746 Page 102 of 746 Page 103 of 746 Page 104 of 746 Page 105 of 746 Page 106 of 746 Page 107 of 746 Page 108 of 746 Page 109 of 746 Page 110 of 746 Page 111 of 746 Page 112 of 746 Page 113 of 746 Page 114 of 746 Page 115 of 746 Page 116 of 746 Page 117 of 746 Page 118 of 746 Page 119 of 746 Page 120 of 746 Page 121 of 746 Page 122 of 746 Page 123 of 746 Page 124 of 746 Page 125 of 746 Page 126 of 746 Page 127 of 746 Page 128 of 746 Page 129 of 746 Page 130 of 746 Page 131 of 746 Page 132 of 746 Page 133 of 746 Page 134 of 746 Page 135 of 746 Page 136 of 746 Page 137 of 746 Page 138 of 746 Page 139 of 746 Page 140 of 746 Page 141 of 746 Page 142 of 746 Page 143 of 746 Page 144 of 746 Page 145 of 746 Page 146 of 746 Page 147 of 746 Page 148 of 746 Page 149 of 746 Page 150 of 746 Page 151 of 746 Page 152 of 746 Page 153 of 746 Page 154 of 746 Page 155 of 746 Page 156 of 746 Page 157 of 746 Page 158 of 746 Page 159 of 746 Page 160 of 746 Page 161 of 746 Page 162 of 746 Page 163 of 746 Page 164 of 746 Page 165 of 746 Page 166 of 746 Page 167 of 746 Page 168 of 746 Page 169 of 746 Page 170 of 746 Page 171 of 746 Page 172 of 746 Page 173 of 746 Page 174 of 746 Page 175 of 746 Page 176 of 746 Page 177 of 746 Page 178 of 746 Page 179 of 746 Page 180 of 746 Page 181 of 746 Page 182 of 746 Page 183 of 746 Page 184 of 746 Page 185 of 746 Page 186 of 746 Page 187 of 746 Page 188 of 746 Page 189 of 746 Page 190 of 746 Page 191 of 746 Page 192 of 746 Page 193 of 746 Page 194 of 746 Page 195 of 746 Page 196 of 746 Page 197 of 746 Page 198 of 746 Page 199 of 746 Page 200 of 746 Page 201 of 746 Page 202 of 746 Page 203 of 746 Page 204 of 746 Page 205 of 746 Page 206 of 746 Page 207 of 746 Page 208 of 746 Page 209 of 746 Page 210 of 746 Page 211 of 746 Page 212 of 746 Page 213 of 746 Page 214 of 746 Page 215 of 746 Page 216 of 746 Page 217 of 746 Page 218 of 746 Page 219 of 746 Page 220 of 746 Page 221 of 746 Page 222 of 746 Page 223 of 746 Page 224 of 746 Page 225 of 746 Page 226 of 746 Page 227 of 746 Page 228 of 746 Page 229 of 746 Page 230 of 746 Page 231 of 746 Page 232 of 746 Page 233 of 746 Page 234 of 746 Page 235 of 746 Page 236 of 746 Page 237 of 746 Page 238 of 746 Page 239 of 746 Page 240 of 746 Page 241 of 746 Page 242 of 746 Page 243 of 746 Page 244 of 746 Page 245 of 746 Page 246 of 746 Page 247 of 746 Page 248 of 746 Page 249 of 746 Page 250 of 746 Page 251 of 746 Page 252 of 746 Page 253 of 746 Page 254 of 746 Page 255 of 746 Page 256 of 746 Page 257 of 746 Page 258 of 746 Page 259 of 746 Page 260 of 746 Page 261 of 746 Page 262 of 746 Page 263 of 746 Page 264 of 746 Page 265 of 746 Page 266 of 746 Page 267 of 746 Page 268 of 746 Page 269 of 746 Page 270 of 746 Page 271 of 746 Page 272 of 746 Page 273 of 746 Page 274 of 746 Page 275 of 746 Page 276 of 746 Page 277 of 746 Page 278 of 746 Page 279 of 746 Page 280 of 746 Page 281 of 746 Page 282 of 746 Page 283 of 746 Page 284 of 746 Page 285 of 746 Page 286 of 746 Page 287 of 746 Page 288 of 746 Page 289 of 746 Page 290 of 746 Page 291 of 746 Page 292 of 746 Page 293 of 746 Page 294 of 746 Page 295 of 746 Page 296 of 746 Page 297 of 746 Page 298 of 746 Page 299 of 746 Page 300 of 746 Page 301 of 746 Page 302 of 746 Page 303 of 746 Page 304 of 746 Page 305 of 746 Page 306 of 746 Page 307 of 746 Page 308 of 746 Page 309 of 746 Page 310 of 746 Page 311 of 746 Page 312 of 746 Page 313 of 746 Page 314 of 746 Page 315 of 746 Page 316 of 746 Page 317 of 746 Page 318 of 746 Page 319 of 746 Page 320 of 746 Page 321 of 746 Page 322 of 746 Page 323 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.3 Department: IT Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Browning, IT Director Item Title: Purchase Request: Annual LOGIS Services Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for LOGIS software and services in use throughout the City for $537,655.00. Requisition Number: 12600006 Vendor: LOGIS Equipment Status: Replacement Funding Source: IT, Fire and Community Development Budgets Cost: $537,655 Information/Background: This is a request for purchase for LOGIS software and services in use by a number of city departments.LOGIS is a local government consortium and offers us the ability to bulk purchase software and services with many other metro cities. This year's purchase is a renewal of existing services. These services include the following: Department Service Amount Community Dev Property Data & Special Assessment Software $125,965.00 Fire Permits and Inspections Software $89,730.00 IT Fiber Services $40,330.00 IT Internet Services $30,400.00 IT IP Telephony $118,820.00 IT Security and Backup $132,410.00 Resources/Financial Impacts: This purchase will be paid for by the various departments' operating budgets and is within budget. Staff recommends that the City proceed with this purchase. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: The software and services that we purchase through LOGIS provide critical functions that are central to city government. These include the building permit system, phone system, and a number of IT access and security functions. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Page 324 of 746 Values Impact: Stewardship By purchasing software and services through the LOGIS consortium, we can take advantage of bulk-purchasing discounts. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 325 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.4 Department: IT Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Browning, IT Director Item Title: Purchase Request: 2026 Computer Replacements Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for the annual computer replacements from HP for $82,450.80. Requisition Number: 12600008 Vendor: HP Equipment Status: Replacement Funding Source: IT Equipment Replacement Cost: $82,450.80 Information/Background: This request is for the purchase of HP desktops and laptops due for replacement in 2026 according to our standard replacement schedule. This replacement will refresh these computers and eliminate age-related technical issues. In 2026, we are expecting to replace at least 60 computers. Resources/Financial Impacts: This purchase is within budget and will be paid out of the I.T. equipment replacement budget. I.T. staff will configure, order, and install these replacements for our staff around the City. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Regular computer replacements are key to keeping our computers functioning at a high level. Our staff rely on these systems to provide many critical services to City residents. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Stewardship We time computer replacements to maximize the useful life and minimize productivity loss due to hardware issues. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 326 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.5 Department: IT Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Browning, IT Director Item Title: Purchase Request: Annual Card Access and Security Camera Agreements Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for the Annual Card Access and Security Camera Support and License Agreements from Pro-Tec Design for $99,957.70. Requisition Number: 12600007 Vendor: Pro-Tec Design Equipment Status: Replacement Funding Source: IT Operating Budget Cost: $99,957.70 Information/Background: This request is for the purchase of support and license agreements covering security camera and card access systems in use at City facilities. This agreement covers both labor and materials for card access failures, as well as yearly preventive maintenance for both card access and security camera systems. This purchase includes the following agreements: Card Access Hardware Support Agreement - $38,660.00 Card Access Software Hosting Agreement - $37,432.62 Security Camera Software Support Agreement - $18,942.00 Security Camera Cleaning and Testing Agreement - $4,923.08 Resources/Financial Impacts: This purchase is within budget and will be paid out of the I.T. budget. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Support for the City's Security equipment is critical to City operations and is part of the I.T. Department's annual work plan. Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Security systems provide protection for many City facilities. By performing regular maintenance on these devices, we are extending their useful life. Page 327 of 746 Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 328 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.6 Department: Finance Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Pa Thao, Finance Director Item Title: Ordinance 2026-01: Setting Morningside Water Rates Action Requested: Approve Ordinance 2026-01: Amending Code Section 2-724 Schedule A, setting Morningside water rates for 2025, and grant first reading. Information/Background: The City of Minneapolis provides the water used by much of the Morningside area of Edina. Edina pays Minneapolis for the water that comes into our City from Minneapolis based on a contracted rate. The contracted rate that Edina pays is proportional to the rates the Minneapolis City Council sets for their own residents. The Minneapolis rate for 2026 is $4.13 per 100 cubic feet of water, a 32.80% increase over the 2025 rate. The City of Edina also provides services to this area in the form of meter reading, billing, water distribution infrastructure, and other services except for water itself. To help offset the cost of these Edina-provided services, staff recommends increasing the Edina charge by 5.25% to 0.97/1,000 gallons in 2026. This rate adjustment is consistent with the rates recommended by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, in the 2025 utility rate study. The recommended Morningside water rate for 2026 is $6.50 per 1,000 gallons of water. Below is the rate history and the recommended rate for 2026. (per 1,000 gal) 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Minneapolis charge $3.60 $3.74 $3.94 $4.16 $5.52 Edina charge $0.80 $0.84 $0.88 $0.93 $0.97 Total Rate $4.40 $4.58 $4.82 $5.09 $6.50 For areas of Edina that do not receive Minneapolis water, the 2026 adopted rates are $2.81, $4.27, or $7.06 per 1,000 gallons, depending on type and quantity of usage. Another difference between Minneapolis and Edina water is Minneapolis delivers softened water, while Edina residents use home water softener systems. Resources/Financial Impacts: Utility Fund Page 329 of 746 Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This is essential to our City policy and infrastructure. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Values Impact: Equity By aligning costs with actual service usage, individuals are not disadvantaged based on where they live. It creates a transparent and uniform system that treats all community members equally, regardless of municipal borders, while maintaining affordability and access to essential water services. Stewardship By ensuring responsible management of shared water resources and financial fairness. Including the bordering city’s water rate reflects prudent use of public funds and promotes sustainability. This approach respects the long-term viability of the system while maintaining equitable service for residents who rely on cross-boundary water access. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 330 of 746 Ordinance 2026-01: Setting Morningside Water Rates The City of Edina Ordains: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 2-724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter and Section Purpose of Fee/Charge 2025 Fee Proposed 2026 Fee Chapter 28 28-43(b) Water Service: 1. Per 1,000 gallons for areas of city, except in the Morningside area $4.82 Per 1,000 gallons — Morningside area $6.50 Per 1,000 gallons — Morningside area Section 2. The effective date of Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be March 1, 2026. First Reading: January 20, 2026 Second Reading: February 3, 2026 Summary for Publication: Minneapolis supplies water to much of Morningside in Edina, with Edina paying Minneapolis based on a contracted rate proportional to what Minneapolis residents pay. In 2026, the Minneapolis rate will be $4.13 per 100 cubic feet, a 32.80% increase from 2025. Edina handles meter reading, billing, and infrastructure for this area. To cover these services, a 5.25% increase to $0.97 per 1,000 gallons is recommended for 2026. The suggested Morningside water rate for 2026 is $6.50 per 1,000 gallons. Page 331 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.7 Department: Finance Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Pa Thao, Finance Director Item Title: Resolution 2026-01 : Amending the Budget for the City of Edina for Year 2026 Action Requested: Approve Resolution 2026-01 Amending the 2026 City Budget Information/Background: On December 16, the City Council adopted the final 2026 budget and approved a 7.94% tax levy increase. Following adoption, staff identified the need for an amendment to the Utility Enterprise Fund. The capital outlay expense in the adopted budget does not align with the approved Utility Rate Study. To ensure accuracy and compliance, we are requesting approval of this amendment so the budget matches the approved utility rates. This amendment does not affect the 2026 certified tax levy approved by Council on December 16, 2025. It solely updates the Utility Enterprise Fund to reflect the correct figures from the utility rate study for 2026. Resources/Financial Impacts: Utility Fund Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Better Together Values Impact: Stewardship Transparency and accuracy of financials Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. 2026 Revised Budget Report Page 332 of 746 Resolution 2026-01 : Amending the Budget for the City of Edina for Year 2026 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Budgets for all Governmental Funds as shown on Attachment A for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2026 is hereby amended and funds are hereby appropriated; Section 2. The Budgets for all Enterprise Funds as shown on Attachment B for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2026 is hereby amended and funds are hereby appropriated Section 3. That the final 2026 budget for the City of Edina is amended as follows: 2026 ORIGINAL 2026 AMENDED TOTAL REVENUES – GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS $137,033,756 $137,033,756 TOTAL EXPENDITURES – GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS $141,625,711 $141,625,711 TOTAL REVENUES – ENTERPRISE FUNDS $61,282,163 $62,651,876 TOTAL EXPENDITURES – ENTERPRISE FUNDS $73,148,778 $70,518,779 TOTAL REVENUES – INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS $9,941,988 $9,941,988 TOTAL EXPENDITURES – INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS $10,001,885 $10,001,885 Approved this 20th day of January 2026. Page 333 of 746 Budget 2026 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy 53,012,940$ General Fund Subtotal 53,012,940 Increase From Prior Year (%)11.50% Debt Service Fund Levies Fire Station 1 403,000 Public Works Facility 1,389,583 Sports Dome 1,166,100 Fire Station 2*2,842,600 Highway 100 Interchange 207,200 Aquatic Center 439,800 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 6,448,283 Increase From Prior Year (%)19.91% Construction Fund Levies Capital Improvement Plan Levy 1,300,000 Equipment Levy 1,613,450 Street Reconstruction Levy 1,053,000 Special Park Improvement Levy - Construction Fund Subtotal 3,966,450 Increase From Prior Year (%)-31.96% HRA Fund Levies HRA Operating Levy 267,100 HRA Fund Subtotal 267,100 Increase From Prior Year (%)3.01% Total Property Tax Levy 63,694,773$ Increase From Prior Year (%)7.94% ADOPTED TAX LEVIES Page 334 of 746 Opioid Braemar Public Debt General HRA PACS Response CAS Police SR Memorial Safety Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Property Tax Levy 53,012,940$ 267,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,448,283$ 3,966,450$ 63,694,773$ Tax Increments - 5,352,000 - - - - - - - - 5,352,000 Local Option Sales Tax - - - - - - - - - 7,080,000 7,080,000 Franchise Fees & Other Taxes 735,400 - 1,314,402 - 1,065,360 - - - - 1,493,892 4,609,054 Special Assessments - 36,000 - - - - - - 187,805 2,584,229 2,808,034 Licenses & Permits 5,775,325 - - - - - - - - - 5,775,325 Intergovernmental 2,383,595 225,000 379,840 - - - - - - 6,400,000 9,388,435 Charges for Services 6,695,303 110,000 - - - - - - - 303,067 7,108,370 Fines and Forfeitures 500,000 - - - - - - - - - 500,000 Investment Income 450,000 439,880 22,660 2,060 47,380 3,090 1,030 106,243 - 1,162,360 2,234,703 Other Revenue 556,000 63,000 - - - 225,000 2,500 - - - 846,500 Transfers and Contributions 666,437 - - - - - - - 3,544,192 5,887 4,216,516 Debt Issued - 471,000 - - - - - - - 22,923,046 23,394,046 Other Financing Sources 5,000 - - - - - - - - 21,000 26,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 70,780,000 6,963,980 1,716,902 2,060 1,112,740 228,090 3,530 106,243 10,180,280 45,939,931 137,033,756 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE Personnel Services 48,917,183 189,508 134,488 - 297,702 - - - - 144,064 49,682,945 Contractual Services 11,466,543 4,519,470 75,720 - 877,370 112,650 10,000 - - 705,337 17,767,090 Commodities 2,463,468 2,000 5,500 - 6,000 10,000 - - - 15,839 2,502,807 Internal Services 6,882,806 2,450 9,959 - 24,350 - - - - 6,168 6,925,734 Capital Outlay - 2,150,000 1,230,500 - 600,000 - - 25,000 - 43,946,501 47,952,001 Debt Service - - - - - - - - 11,696,943 - 11,696,943 Transfers and Contributions 1,050,000 703,750 - - - - - 504,000 - 2,840,442 5,098,192 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 70,780,000 7,567,178 1,456,167 - 1,805,422 122,650 10,000 529,000 11,696,943 47,658,350 141,625,711 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 3,514,565 - - - - - - - - 100,000 3,614,565 Human Resources 2,049,774 - - - - - - - - - 2,049,774 Finance 2,980,621 - - - - - - - - - 2,980,621 Public Works 6,666,553 - - - - - - - - 350,000 7,016,553 Engineering 5,393,943 - 1,456,167 - 1,805,422 - - - - 17,651,104 26,306,636 Fire 17,592,549 - - - - - - - - 495,725 18,088,274 Parks and Recreation 8,604,293 - - - - - 10,000 - - 28,482,200 37,096,493 Police 19,862,071 - - - - 122,650 - 529,000 - 392,321 20,906,042 Community Development 2,288,606 7,567,178 - - - - - - - 72,000 9,927,784 Information Technology - - - - - - - - - 45,000 45,000 Communications 1,827,024 - - - - - - - - 70,000 1,897,024 Debt Service - - - - - - - - 11,696,943 - 11,696,943 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 70,780,000 7,567,178 1,456,167 - 1,805,422 122,650 10,000 529,000 11,696,943 47,658,350 141,625,711 CHANGE IN NET POSITION -$ (603,198)$ 260,735$ 2,060$ (692,682)$ 105,440$ (6,470)$ (422,757)$ (1,516,663)$ (1,718,419)$ (4,591,955)$ 2026 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS Page 335 of 746 Aquatic Golf Braemar Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Field Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating Revenues 35,217,740$ 10,960,000$ 1,160,901$ 6,274,400$ 2,999,125$ 570,150$ 125,000$ 1,530,798$ 982,759$ 59,820,873$ Intergovernmental 182,000 - - 1,500 - - - - - 183,500 Investment Income 447,020 45,320 49,440 53,560 13,390 26,780 4,120 10,300 4,936 654,866 Other Revenues 5,000 - - - - - - - - 5,000 Transfers In - 5,400 19,400 100,700 192,250 1,330 501,025 721,000 446,532 1,987,637 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 35,851,760 11,010,720 1,229,741 6,430,160 3,204,765 598,260 630,145 2,262,098 1,434,227 62,651,876 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE Cost of Goods Sold - 7,348,000 81,500 306,000 128,125 - - 39,500 15,000 7,918,125 Personnel Services 3,957,086 1,786,618 696,847 2,906,674 1,639,083 224,433 340,623 1,264,187 1,041,847 13,857,398 Contractual Services 11,060,699 820,569 341,188 933,677 1,286,102 301,414 83,824 501,678 427,645 15,756,796 Commodities 1,419,150 51,500 159,121 508,050 160,363 19,675 29,275 207,456 149,805 2,704,394 Internal Services 1,801,447 403,356 74,939 594,633 338,439 98,199 63,043 259,064 177,334 3,810,453 Capital Outlay 22,676,037 - - 571,000 - 200,000 - - - 23,447,037 Interest and Fiscal Charges 1,643,406 - 5,900 165,194 43,025 - - - - 1,857,525 Transfers and Contributions 517,051 650,000 - - - - - - - 1,167,051 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 43,074,876 11,060,043 1,359,495 5,985,228 3,595,137 843,720 516,765 2,271,885 1,811,631 70,518,779 CHANGE IN NET POSITION (7,223,116)$ (49,323)$ (129,754)$ 444,932$ (390,372)$ (245,460)$ 113,380$ (9,787)$ (377,404)$ (7,866,903)$ 2026 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS Page 336 of 746 Risk Equipment Information Facilities Management Operations Technology Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operational Revenues 2,788,877$ 2,247,840$ 2,992,865$ 1,912,406$ 9,941,988$ TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 2,788,877 2,247,840 2,992,865 1,912,406 9,941,988 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE Personnel Services 499,042 849,612 1,465,496 609,418 3,423,568 Contractual Services 2,207,141 245,820 1,253,685 1,080,882 4,787,528 Commodities 8,000 1,108,300 215,000 93,239 1,424,539 Capital Outlay - - 265,000 101,250 366,250 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 2,714,183 2,203,732 3,199,181 1,884,789 10,001,885 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Human Resources 2,714,183 - - - 2,714,183 Public Works - 2,203,732 - - 2,203,732 Engineering - - - 1,884,789 1,884,789 Information Technology - - 3,199,181 - 3,199,181 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 2,714,183 2,203,732 3,199,181 1,884,789 10,001,885 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 74,694$ 44,108$ (206,316)$ 27,617$ (59,898)$ 2026 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGETS Page 337 of 746 Governmental Enterprise Internal Service Funds Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property Tax Levy 63,694,773$ -$ -$ 63,694,773$ Tax Increments 5,352,000 - - 5,352,000 Local Option Sales Tax 7,080,000 - - 7,080,000 Franchise Fees & Other Taxes 4,609,054 597,417 - 5,206,471 Special Assessments 2,808,034 - - 2,808,034 Licenses & Permits 5,775,325 - - 5,775,325 Intergovernmental 9,388,435 183,500 - 9,571,935 Charges for Services 7,108,370 126,775 9,880,898 17,116,043 Fines and Forfeitures 500,000 - - 500,000 Investment Income 2,234,703 654,866 - 2,889,569 Other Revenue 872,500 3,568,766 - 4,441,266 Transfers and Contributions 4,216,516 1,987,637 61,090 6,265,243 Operating Revenue - 55,532,915 - 55,532,915 Debt Issued 23,394,046 - - 23,394,046 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 137,033,756 62,651,876 9,941,988 209,627,620 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of Goods Sold - 7,918,125 - 7,918,125 Personnel Services 49,682,945 13,857,398 3,423,568 66,963,911 Contractual Services 17,767,090 15,756,796 4,787,528 38,311,413 Commodities 2,502,807 2,704,394 1,424,539 6,631,740 Internal Services 6,925,734 3,810,453 - 10,736,187 Capital Outlay 47,952,001 23,447,037 366,250 71,765,288 Debt Service 11,696,943 1,857,525 - 13,554,468 Transfers and Contributions 5,098,192 1,167,051 - 6,265,243 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 141,625,711 70,518,779 10,001,885 222,146,375 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration 3,614,565 - - 3,614,565 Human Resources 2,049,774 - 2,714,183 4,763,957 Finance 2,980,621 829,070 - 3,809,691 Public Works 7,016,553 39,626,638 2,203,732 48,846,924 Engineering 26,306,636 757,241 1,884,789 28,948,666 Fire 18,088,274 1,861,927 - 19,950,200 Parks and Recreation 37,096,493 27,443,903 - 64,540,396 Police 20,906,042 - - 20,906,042 Community Development 9,927,784 - - 9,927,784 Information Technology 45,000 - 3,199,181 3,244,181 Communications 1,897,024 - - 1,897,024 Debt Service 11,696,943 - - 11,696,943 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 141,625,711 70,518,779 10,001,885 222,146,375 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION (4,591,955) (7,866,903) (59,898) (12,518,755) FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 119,094,454 137,400,893 8,433,640 264,928,987 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 114,502,499$ 129,533,990$ 8,373,742$ 252,410,232$ 2026 Budget Page 338 of 746 2024 2025 2026 Actual Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property Tax Levy 53,549,122$ 59,010,154$ 63,694,773$ 7.94% Tax Increments 3,176,176 2,415,000 5,352,000 121.61% Local Option Sales Tax 6,537,828 5,436,000 7,080,000 30.24% Franchise Fees & Other Taxes 3,934,563 3,995,900 5,206,471 30.30% Special Assessments 4,761,837 3,723,637 2,808,034 -24.59% Licenses & Permits 6,010,368 5,819,338 5,775,325 -0.76% Intergovernmental 6,365,180 2,748,582 9,571,935 248.25% Charges for Services 17,949,252 18,437,811 17,116,043 -7.17% Fines and Forfeitures 621,837 350,000 500,000 42.86% Operating Revenue 54,691,610 55,967,574 55,532,915 -0.78% Investment Income 5,780,623 1,825,000 2,889,569 58.33% Other Revenue 5,082,337 3,919,982 4,441,266 13.30% Transfers and Contributions 5,544,002 4,672,391 6,265,243 34.09% Debt Issued 59,036,132 - 23,394,046 N/A Other Financing Sources - 1,016,000 - -100.00% TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 233,040,865 169,337,369 209,627,620 23.79% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of Goods Sold 9,009,283 11,453,268 7,918,125 -30.87% Personnel Services 58,324,370 64,456,712 66,963,911 3.89% Contractual Services 33,914,417 39,173,423 38,311,413 -2.20% Commodities 5,011,923 6,710,039 6,631,740 -1.17% Internal Services 9,451,057 9,404,606 10,736,187 14.16% Capital Outlay 36,843,379 48,999,406 71,765,288 46.46% Depreciation 9,192,741 - - N/A Debt Service 9,815,736 26,809,224 13,554,468 -49.44% Transfers and Contributions 5,544,002 4,672,391 6,265,243 34.09% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 177,106,909 211,679,069 222,146,375 4.94% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 2,729,452 3,232,608 3,614,565 11.82% Human Resources 4,635,902 4,441,444 4,763,957 7.26% Finance 4,097,352 2,516,676 3,809,691 51.38% Public Works 30,767,240 48,843,492 48,846,924 0.01% Engineering 23,128,536 29,779,168 28,948,666 -2.79% Fire 27,480,721 17,955,783 19,950,200 11.11% Parks and Recreation 43,101,498 41,744,115 64,540,396 54.61% Police 18,580,806 20,068,269 20,906,042 4.17% Community Development 10,043,154 13,021,625 9,927,784 -23.76% Information Technology 2,807,387 3,278,168 3,244,181 -1.04% Communications 1,786,130 1,785,379 1,897,024 6.25% Debt Service 7,948,732 25,012,343 11,696,943 -53.24% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 177,106,909 211,679,069 222,146,375 4.94% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION 55,933,956 (42,341,700) (12,518,755) FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 251,336,729 307,270,686 264,928,987 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 307,270,686$ 264,928,986$ 252,410,232$ CONSOLIDATED BUDGET Page 339 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.8 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager Item Title: Purchase Request: Change Order #1: Home Energy Squad Contract Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request: Change Order #1 for Home Energy Squad Contract with Center for Energy and Environment for $15,000. Requisition Number: 124000112 Vendor: Center for Energy and Environment Equipment Status: n/a Funding Source: Conservation & Sustainability Fund Cost: $15,000 Information/Background: The City has contracted with Center for Energy and Environment since 2013 to support low-cost home energy efficiency assessments and improvements. In 2024, City Council approved a three-year contract to provide discounted home energy assessments to Edina residents. This is the last year of the current contract. Demand for Home Energy Squad visits increased 17% from 2024, resulting in 233 visits in 2025. Increased engagement and promotion, plus a special Earth Day 100% discount promotion drove an increase in participation. This Change Order will increase the total contract amount to $45,000 and allow the City of Edina to continue to offer discounted visits through the remainder of this year and offer special promotions related to Earth Day and the anticipated launch of Save Energy MN, the new statewide rebate program which requires a home energy assessment to be eligible. Resources/Financial Impacts: Funding source is the Conservation & Sustainability Fund. No impacts on staff capacity or operations. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Providing discounted Home Energy Squad Visits aligns with our Climate Action Plan goals. Livable City Page 340 of 746 Values Impact: Equity Special incentives are available to low and moderate income households to fully cover the cost of the Home Energy Squad visit. Health Home Energy Squad evaluates a home's efficiency, heating and cooling equipment, and weatherization, which all improve home health and safety. Sustainability The Climate Action Plan set a goal to increase participation in home energy audit programs and the buy-down program creates additional incentives for Edina residents to participate. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. Change Order 1 (Board Portal) Page 341 of 746 Amendment 5382 This First Amendment made by and between CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, (“CEE”), and CITY OF EDINA, (“CLIENT”) provides professional services pursuant to the HOME ENERGY SQUAD AGREEMENT #4595 signed by CEE and CLIENT with an effective date of April 1, 2024. Unless otherwise stated below, all other terms and conditions shall remain in full effect. 1. Services/Scope of Work Services shall be coordinated by CEE’s Outreach Manager, Stacy Boots Camp, at sbootscamp@mncee.org or 612-244-2429. 2. Compensation This Amendment adds $15,000 for a new contract total not to exceed $45,000. City of Edina will continue to be invoiced quarterly. CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT By: Its: Date: CITY OF EDINA CLIENT By: Its: Date: Page 342 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.9 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Title: Purchase Request: Ariel Lift Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for an Aerial Lift with Forklifts of Minnesota for $60,217.50 Requisition Number: 12500299 Vendor: Forklifts of Minnesota Equipment Status: New Funding Source: Operating Budget Cost: $60,217.50 Information/Background: Ariel Lifts such as these are used by various departments in the City to access elevated items safely. This equipment will be used by trained personnel of the Public Works Department. Resources/Financial Impacts: Equipment Operating budget. No further financial impacts are expected. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Lifts allow staff to safely access elevated areas such as light fixtures and other infrastructure. Strong Foundation Values Impact: Stewardship Regular repairs and maintenance to equipment ensures their continued use. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. City of Edina Skyjack Quote (Board Portal) Page 343 of 746 Derek Otten City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 952-826-0356 December 30, 2025 Quote: JO Skyjack SJ30AJRE City of Edina Jake O’Neill 612-363-6503 joneill@forkliftsofmn.com WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: ONE (1) NEW SKYJACK SJ30 ARJE – ELECTRIC ARTICULATING BOOM MAX WORKING HEIGHT: 35’ 6” MAX HORIZONTAL REACH: 20’ 7” MAX PLATFORM HEIGHT: 29’ 6” MAX UP AND OVER: 13’ 1” PLATFORM L x W: 30” x 46” HEIGHT STOWED: 6’ 6” LENGTH STOWED: 18’ 1’ GRADEABILITY (STOWED): DRIVE SPEED (STOWED): DRIVE SPEED (RAISED): WIDTH: MAX LIFT CAPACITY: ROTATION: PLATFORM ROTATION: TIRES: POWER: WEIGHT: OVERVIEW: 35% 3 mph 0.4 mph 47” 500 lbs. 355° NC 180° Solid – Non Marking 48V 305 Ah Battery Pack 12,320 lbs. Lead Time: 5 Weeks EQUIPMENT PRICE ………………………………………………………… $ 57,117.50 INBOUND & OUTBOUND FREIGHT ………………………….…….. $ 2,600.00 DEALER PREP …………………………………………………………... $ 500.00 GRAND TOTAL PRICE ………………………………………………………………………….. $ 60,217.50 PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO PRICE INCREASES AND FREIGHT SURCHARGES THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF OUR CONTROL - SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE SALES TAX. TERMS: STANDARD, NET AT DELIVERY - F.O.B. DELIVERED Presented By: Jake O’Neill – Sales Representative Accepted By: Title Date • Skyjack articulating booms offer precise positioning capabilities packaged in a high capacity boom with industry-leading up-and-over reach. The tight turning radius on these machines and minimal tailswing make them ideal for maneuvering in confined areas. Page 344 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.10 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Title: Resolution 2026-03: Supporting the Dissolution of the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2026-03, supporting dissolution of the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition. Information/Background: With the mission of the coalition largely accomplished, the Coalition’s leadership has recommended an orderly and transparent dissolution. To support this process, the coalition has requested that each member jurisdiction submit documentation of support for dissolution by Feb. 1. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 345 of 746 Resolution 2026-03: Supporting the Dissolution of the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition Whereas the U.S Highway 169 Corridor Coalition was established in 2009 as a collaborative effort among cities, counties and stakeholders to advocate for transportation improvements, safety and economic development along the U.S. Highway 169 corridor; and Whereas the Coalition successfully unified regional voices to elevate the corridor's importance in state and federal transportation planning, securing attention and investment for key infrastructure projects; and Whereas the Coalition has fulfilled its original mission, and its member jurisdictions have developed the capacity to pursue corridor priorities through other regional and legislative channels; and Whereas the Coalition's leadership has recommended an orderly and transparent dissolution process, ensuring that remaining funds and responsibilities are appropriately distributed and documented; Now, therefore, be it resolved that the City of Edina formally supports the dissolution of the U.S. Highway 169 Corridor Coalition, recognizing its contributions to regional transportation advocacy and collaboration. Now, therefore, be it further resolved that the City expresses its gratitude to past and present Coalition members, staff and partners for their service and dedication to the corridor's long-term vitality. Dated: January 20, 2026 Page 346 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.11 Department: Police Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Schultz, Lieutenant Item Title: Purchase Request: Rave Contract Renewal Action Requested: Approve the 3-year renewal contract with Rave Mobile Safety. Requisition Number: 2026/12600015 Vendor: Rave Mobile Safety Equipment Status: Service Contract Renewal Funding Source: E911 Funds Cost: $57,222.00 Information/Background: This contract renewal with Rave Mobile Safety will allow for continued use of RAVE alerts which provide information quickly to the public when there are large police or public safety events. This software also provides the opportunity for the public to fill out a safety profile that is delivered to the dispatcher's screen when a call to 911 is placed. Resources/Financial Impacts: This contract will be paid out of 911 funds, where the current contract is being paid. It is a 3-year contract with an annual cost of $19,074.00. The total cost of the contract over 3 years will be $57,222.00 from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2028. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: This contract will allow for continued text alerts to the public about large police events and/or public safety events. Reliable Service Values Impact: Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 347 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.12 Department: Police Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Schultz, Lieutenant Item Title: CHS-1 Shared/Hosted Phone Contract Amendments Action Requested: Approve the amendments to the CHS-1 Shared/Hosted Phone Contract. Information/Background: These are amendments to the currently approved CHS-1 Shared/Hosted Phone Contract. The change is to bring two new member PSAPs (911 centers) on to the system from Bloomington and Eden Prairie. This would also change percent ownership, so that the annual maintenance amount owed will lower. Resources/Financial Impacts: These amendments would move from a 7.6% to a 6.0% ownership rate, reducing annual maintenance cost from $5,108 to $4,008. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Reliable Service Values Impact: Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. Amendment 1 to the Master Cooperative Agreement for Planning and Coordinating Delivery of Emergency Communications Services 2. Second Amendment to Ancillary Agreement Page 348 of 746 Page 1 of 10 October 2025 AMENDMENT 1 to the MASTER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING AND COORDINATING DELIVERY OF EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES THIS AMENDMENT modifies the original Master Cooperative Agreement for Planning and Coordinating Delivery of Emergency Communications Services (“Agreement”). The modification is specifically to add two (2) parties to the Agreement. The original Parties included Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center (collectively, the “Parties”), which own and operate individual Public Safety Answering Points (“PSAPs”) or Secondary PSAPs, and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (“MESB”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, five (5) original Parties, and the MESB, entered the Agreement as authorized by Minnesota Statute § 471.59, to facilitate the governance for planning and coordination of procurement of emergency communications services including E9-1-1 and emerging services such as next generation NG9-1-1; and WHEREAS, the Agreement was developed and written to allow for additional PSAPs to join; and WHEREAS, City of Bloomington and City of Eden Prairie, each owning and operating individual PSAPs, desire to join the Agreement as additional Parties; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 2025, and in compliance with the Agreement Art. 10, Section 10.01, the Emergency Communications Services Committee (“ECSC”), made up of one representative from each of the original Parties, unanimously approved the addition of the City of Bloomington and City of Eden Prairie to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2025 and August 25, 2025, and in compliance with Minnesota Statute § 471.59 and the Agreement Art. 8, Section 8.01, the City Council of Bloomington passed Resolutions 2025-76 and 2025-92, agreeing to become an additional Party to the Agreement by authorizing its execution, as herein amended, identifying a representative and designee to the ECSC and authorizing participation in the ECSC; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2025 and September 2, 2025, and in compliance with Minnesota Statute § 471.59 and the Agreement Art. 8, Section 8.01, the City Council of Eden Prairie passed Resolution 2025-057 and 2025-074 agreeing to become an additional Party to the Agreement by authorizing its execution, as herein amended, identifying a representative and designee to the ESCS and authorizing participation in the ECSC; and Page 349 of 746 Page 2 of 10 October 2025 WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington and the City of Eden Prairie each provided the above referenced Resolutions to the MESB; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the Parties, including the additional Parties of the City of Bloomington and the City of Eden Prairie, and the MESB agree that the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. The Parties to the Master Cooperative Agreement include Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center, City of Bloomington, and City of Eden Prairie. This Amendment No. 1 shall be effective upon execution by all Parties. Except as herein amended, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the date written below: (Signature pages to follow) Page 350 of 746 Page 3 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services By: Susan Long, Vice President of Operations Date: SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page 351 of 746 Page 4 of 10 October 2025 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON By: Reviewed and Approved by City Attorney Date: By: Tim Busse, Mayor Date: By: ____________________________________ Zach Walker, City Manager Date: Page 352 of 746 Page 5 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: Scott Gerber, Fire Chief Date: Page 353 of 746 Page 6 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor Date: By: _____________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Date: Page 354 of 746 Page 7 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Department Responsible for Administering and Monitoring Agreement By: ____________________________ Joni Hodne, Director of Department of Emergency Communications Date: ____________________________ Pam Fernandez, Finance Officer Date: Approved as to form: __________________________________________ Brad Cousins, City Attorney Date: Page 355 of 746 Page 8 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Reviewed for COUNTY by STATE OF MINNESOTA the County Attorney’s Office: By: Irene Fernando Michael Bernard Chair of Its County Board Assistant County Attorney Date: Date: ATTEST: Sheri Selton Deputy Clerk of County Board Date: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE By: Patrick Enderlein Jodi Wentland Chief Deputy County Administrator Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Date: Date: By: Grace Helgerson County Administration Clerk Document Assembled by: Date: Jill Rohret Executive Director, MESB Date: Page 356 of 746 Page 9 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center By: ____________________________ Martin Scheerer, Senior Director of Hennepin EMS Date: Page 357 of 746 Page 10 of 10 October 2025 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD By: _________________________________ Board Chair Date: Approved as to form: Board Counsel Page 358 of 746 Page 1 of 12 SECOND AMENDMENT TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT 01 FOR PROCURMENT OF A SHARED/HOSTED 9-1-1 CALL HANDLING SYSTEM AND RELATED SHARED WIDE AREA NETWORK CONNECTIVITY AND SHARED DATA CENTER USAGE to the MASTER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING AND COORDINATING DELIVERY OF EMEGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT (“Second Amendment”) modifies the Ancillary Agreement 01 for Procurement of a Shared/Hosted 9-1-1 Call Handling System and Related Shared Wide Area Network Connectivity to the Master Cooperative Agreement for Planning and Coordinating Delivery of Emergency Communications Services, as amended by Amendment 1, (“Ancillary Agreement”). The modification is specifically to add two (2) parties to the Ancillary Agreement. The original Parties included Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc., d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center (collectively, the “Parties”), which own and operate individual Public Safety Answering Points (“PSAPs”) or Secondary PSAPs, and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (“MESB”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on June 16, 2014, the five (5) original Parties and the MESB entered into the Ancillary Agreement 01 for Procurement of a Shared/Hosted 9-1-1 Call Handling System and Related Shared Wide Area Network Connectivity to the Master Cooperative Agreement for Planning and Coordinating Delivery of Emergency Communications Services; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2022, the Parties and the MESB approved Amendment 1 to the Ancillary Agreement to create a process to allow additional parties to join; and WHEREAS, City of Bloomington and City of Eden Prairie, each owning and operating individual PSAPs, desire to join the Ancillary Agreement as additional Parties; and WHEREAS, on April 23, 2025, and in compliance with the Ancillary Agreement Art. 12, Section 12.01, the System Owners Group (“SOG”), made up of one representative from each of the original Parties, unanimously approved the addition of the City of Bloomington and City of Eden Prairie to the Ancillary Agreement and established conditions for these two additional Parties to join; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2025 and August 25, 2025, and in compliance with Minnesota Statute § 471.59 and the Ancillary Agreement Art. 10, Section 10.01 and Art. Page 359 of 746 Page 2 of 12 12, Section 12.02, the City Council of Bloomington passed Resolutions 2025-76 and 2025-92, agreeing to become an additional Party to the Ancillary Agreement by authorizing its execution, as herein amended, identifying a representative and designee to the SOG and authorizing participation in the SOG; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2025 and September 2, 2025, and in compliance with Minnesota Statute § 471.59 and the Ancillary Agreement Art. 10, Section 10.01 and Art. 12, Section 12.02, the City Council of Eden Prairie passed Resolution 2025-057 and 2025-074, agreeing to become an additional Party to the Ancillary Agreement by authorizing its execution, as herein amended, identifying a representative and designee to the SOG and authorizing participation in the SOG; and WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington and the City of Eden Prairie each provided the above referenced Resolutions to the MESB; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the Parties, including the additional Parties of the City of Bloomington and the City of Eden Prairie, and the MESB agree that the Ancillary Agreement, including all prior amendments, is amended as follows: 1. The first paragraph of the Ancillary Agreement, appearing before the “Witnesseth” section, will be amended to read: “THIS ANCILLARY AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between Allina Health System d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, Hennepin County, City of Edina, City of Minneapolis, and Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center, City of Bloomington, and City of Eden Prairie (collectively, the “Parties”) which own and operate individual Public Safety Answering Points (“PSAPs”) or Secondary PSAPs, and the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (“MESB”).” 2. Section 3.07, “Ownership Percentage,” is amended to add at the end: “The Ownership Percentage,” or “Revised Ownership Percentage” as may be applicable, is represented by actual percentages assigned to each Party in Attachment A, attached hereto. The Parties may agree to adjust the percentages in Attachment A, as required by changes to Party workstations, by mutual written agreement and without formal amendment to this Ancillary Agreement. 3. Attachment A shall be added and incorporated into the Agreement. This Second Amendment may be executed electronically in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. Page 360 of 746 Page 3 of 12 This Second Amendment shall be effective upon execution by all Parties. Except as herein amended, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Ancillary Agreement, and any prior amendments, shall remain in full force and effect. Each Party and the MESB represents that it has full authority to enter into and secure performance of this Second Amendment and that the person signing this Second Amendment on behalf of the party has been properly authorized to enter into this Second Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties to this Second Amendment and the MESB have executed this Second Amendment on the date written below: (Signature pages to follow) Page 361 of 746 Page 4 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM d/b/a Allina Health Emergency Medical Services By: Susan Long, Vice President of Operations Date: Page 362 of 746 Page 5 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT CITY OF BLOOMINGTON By: Reviewed and Approved by City Attorney Date: By: Tim Busse, Mayor Date: By: ____________________________________ Zach Walker, City Manager Date: Page 363 of 746 Page 6 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: Scott Gerber, Fire Chief Date: Page 364 of 746 Page 7 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor Date: By: _____________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Date: Page 365 of 746 Page 8 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Department Responsible for Administering and Monitoring Agreement By: ____________________________ Joni Hodne, Director of Department of Emergency Communications Date: ____________________________ Pam Fernandez, Finance Officer Date: Approved as to form: __________________________________________ Brad Cousins, City Attorney Date: Page 366 of 746 Page 9 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Reviewed for COUNTY by STATE OF MINNESOTA the County Attorney’s Office: By: Irene Fernando Michael Bernard Chair of Its County Board Assistant County Attorney Date: Date: ATTEST: Sheri Selton Deputy Clerk of County Board Date: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE By: Patrick Enderlein Jodi Wentland Chief Deputy County Administrator Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Date: Date: By: Grace Helgerson County Administration Clerk Document Assembled by: Date: Jill Rohret Executive Director, MESB Date: Page 367 of 746 Page 10 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a Hennepin County Medical Center By: ____________________________ Martin Scheerer, Senior Director of Hennepin EMS Date: Page 368 of 746 Page 11 of 12 SIGNATURE PAGE TO ANCILLARY AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD By: _________________________________ Board Chair Date: Approved as to form: Board Counsel Page 369 of 746 Page 12 of 12 Attachment A Revised Ownership Percentage Percentage Seven Agencies Workstation 14.9% Allina 19 7.1% Bloomington 6 6.0% Eden Prairie 4 6.0% Edina 4 7.1% Hennepin EMS 6 HCSO Pri (32) HCSO BU (12) 29.8% HCSO Total 44 MECC Pri (31) MECC BU (12) 29.2% MECC Total 43 100% TOTAL 126 Page 370 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.13 Department: Police Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Ryan Schultz, Lieutenant Item Title: Purchase Request: Ford Explorer Police Interceptor Action Requested: Approve Purchase Request for one 2026 Ford Explorer Police Interceptor. Requisition Number: 2026/12600019 Vendor: Tenvoorde Ford Equipment Status: Replacement Funding Source: Police Equipment Replacement Fund Cost: $47,036.77 Information/Background: This vehicle purchase will replace a 2021 Ford F150 that is due for replacement. The purchase is within budget and funded by the police equipment replacement fund. Tenvoorde Ford has State Cooperative Purchasing Contract for Police Interceptors. Resources/Financial Impacts: This purchase is within budget and will be funded by the Police Equipment Replacement Fund. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Reliable Service Values Impact: Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 371 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.14 Department: Fire Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Title: Amendment to Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services Agreement with City of Bloomington Action Requested: Approve amendment to Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services Agreement Requisition Number: 12600016 Vendor: City of Bloomington Equipment Status: Contract Amendment Funding Source: Foundational Public Health Services Grant Cost: $167,096 Information/Background: This action will amend the existing Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services Agreement with the City of Bloomington and its Public Health Division. This action will extend the end date of the agreement from June 30, 2026 to June 30, 2027 and is completely funded by the Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Grant to the City of Edina Community Health Board. The amount of the amendment is $167,096.00. Resources/Financial Impacts: No fiscal impact as agreement is funded by grant. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: The Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Grant is intended to provide local public health with funding to work toward a foundational level of public health infrastructure and resources across Minnesota. The Edina Community Health Board receives this grant funding and utilizes our existing contractual relationship with the City of Bloomington to work towards this goal. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Health Funding to improve foundational public health infrastructure and services accessible to those in Edina. Stewardship Agreement is completely funded by grant. Page 372 of 746 Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. City of Edina Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Amendment (Board Portal) Page 373 of 746 Agreement ID: 2025-1617 SECOND AMENDMENT TO FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSIBILITIES SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made on ______________________ by and between CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 1800 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (“Bloomington”), and CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (“Edina”). Bloomington and Edina are herein referred to collectively as the (“Parties.”) WHEREAS, Bloomington and Edina are parties to an Agreement dated January 1, 2024 (Agreement ID 2024-051), as amended by First Amendment dated February 13, 2025 (Agreement ID 2025-9) pursuant to which Bloomington is responsible for providing Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services to the Residents of Edina (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement ends June 30, 2026. Parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term until June 30, 2027; and WHEREAS, Parties desire to amend the Agreement to include additional services as detailed in Exhibit E, and update the terms of payment in Exhibit F; and WHEREAS, Parties desire to amend the Agreement to increase the total amount of work authorized, including reimbursable expenses, by $167,096.00 for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $509,880.00; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed in this Second Amendment, Parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Services to be Provided: Bloomington agrees to provide the residents of Edina with Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Services as set forth in Bloomington’s Scope of Services attached to this Agreement as Exhibits A, C and E or any supplemental letter agreements entered into between the Parties (“Services”). The Services referenced in the attached Exhibits A, C and E or any supplemental letter agreements shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. All Services shall be provided in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by contractors currently providing similar services.” 2. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Time for Completion. This Agreement shall remain in force and effect commencing from Effective Date and continuing until June 30, 2027, unless terminated by either Party or amended pursuant to the Agreement.” 3. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read: “Consideration: The consideration, which Edina shall pay to Bloomington, shall not exceed $509,880.00, pursuant to the terms of payment set forth in Exhibit B, D and F and incorporated into this Agreement. Page 374 of 746 2 4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not modified by this Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to the Agreement have caused this Second Amendment to be executed the day and year Second above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: City Manager Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. __________________________________ City Attorney CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: Mayor DATED:_______________________ BY:________________________________ Its: City Manager Page 375 of 746 3 EXHIBIT E TO FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSIBILITES SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this funding is to support the implementation of Foundational Public Health Responsibilities (FPHR) by community health boards (grantees). The FPHR are the unique responsibilities of governmental public health that define a minimum package of public health capabilities and programs that must be available in every community. This funding must be used to fulfill foundational public health responsibilities as defined by the Commissioner of Health in consultation with the State Community Health Service Advisory Committee (SCHSAC). Based on the recommendation of SCHSAC, Grantees cannot use these funds for non-FPHR activities at this time. More details on the Foundational Public Health Responsibilities and examples of the work supported by these funds can be found on the MDH website: Funding for Foundational Public Health Responsibilities. Duties: 1. Bloomington and Edina shall complete, and update as necessary, proposed activities and a workplan for MDH approval in REDCap. This workplan will assure compliance with funding requirements and make connections with other grantees. Any changes made to the original proposal must be reviewed and approved by MDH. 2. Bloomington and Edina shall complete a proposed budget in REDCap by the date provided to them by MDH. Any revisions made to the original budget must be made in REDCap and reviewed by MDH. 3. Bloomington and Edina shall implement activities to carry out foundational public health responsibilities in accordance with the definitions outlined on the Funding for Foundational Public Health Responsibilities website and Foundational Public Health Responsibilities Grant Expenditure Guide. 4. Bloomington and Edina shall provide requested financial and programmatic reporting information by the dates provided to them by MDH to meet funding reporting and monitoring requirements. Page 376 of 746 4 EXHIBIT F TO FOUNDATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSIBILITES SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNESOTA CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA TERMS OF PAYMENT A. The Parties agree to allocate the costs of the Services in accordance with each city’s share of the total services provided by Bloomington to all three cities (Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield) as identified below. During the term of this Agreement, Edina shall pay Bloomington the total not-to-exceed amount of $509,880.00 for Foundational Public Health Services. Share of total cost Allocation Method Bloomington Edina Richfield Costs shared equally with an adjustment for social vulnerability index of each city 36% 28% 36% B. Bloomington will provide quarterly itemized invoices to Edina on the following dates: Invoice Dates: April 15, 2026 July 15, 2026 October 15, 2026 January 15, 2027 April 15, 2027 July 15, 2027 C. Edina shall make payment to Bloomington within 30 days of receipt of Bloomington’s invoice. Page 377 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.15 Department: Fire Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Nepa Bryant, Adminstrative Assistant Item Title: Purchase Request: Project Dox Software Subscription Action Requested: Approve payment for the renewal of the Project Dox Software Annual Subscription. Requisition Number: 12500294 Vendor: Avolve Software Corp Equipment Status: Subscription Renewal Funding Source: Building Division Budget Cost: $35,352.00 Information/Background: Since 2017, the city of Edina has been conducting an electronic/paperless palm review utilizing Avolve Software's Project Dox. This software allows for paperless permit submissions of plans. All plan reviews are completed electronically via computer. The software is web-based and used by both city staff and permit applicants. Within the software, multiple departments can review and collaborate between the applicant and other city staff. Corrections, comments, stamps, and approved plans are all completed within Project Dox when issuing a permit. Resources/Financial Impacts: No additional fiscal impact. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Project Dox is budgeted through the Building Division operational budget. Project Dox is served through a cloud-based SAAS environment with integration with our inspection recording software, PIMS. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Engagement Electronic Plan review software that creates a workflow between City of Edina staff and the permit applicant. Stewardship Project Electronic Plan review Software eliminates paper applications and plan submittals while tracking comments and corrections during the plan review cycle. Page 378 of 746 Sustainability Project Dox allows multiple departments to review and collaborate efficiently while communicating with the permit applicant. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 379 of 746 Purchase Request January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.16 Department: Fire Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Shaun White, Training and Safety Chief Item Title: Purchase Request: Blue Peak Consulting Mental Health Provider Renewal Action Requested: Approve the purchase request for a renewal of the Blue Peak Consulting Contract for $26,250. Requisition Number: 12600020 Vendor: Blue Peak Consulting Equipment Status: N/A Funding Source: General Fund Cost: $26,250.00 Information/Background: Renewing Edina Fire’s 2026 service contract with Blue Peak Consulting ensures continuity of the PAR360 program, which provides emergency behavioral health response, leadership consultation, and firefighter training to strengthen resilience, and maintain operational readiness. The renewal mirrors the 2025 agreement, preserving a proven support model that aligns with department goals for mental health, risk management, and workforce sustainability. This stability allows for consistent incident response, proactive culture building, and leadership guidance without service disruption, making renewal a strategic investment in firefighter well-being and organizational effectiveness. Resources/Financial Impacts: No additional budget impact is expected. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Fire Department staff are exposed to multiple emergencies throughout the year. These responses can, and do, have an impact on a responder's mental health. The contract with Blue Peak Consulting provides Edina Fire Department with a Mental Health Professional embedded into our organization to ensure our staff are supported with training and support to better prepare responders for job-related exposures. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Health Mental Health support is a critical component to support for employees. Supporting Documentation: Page 380 of 746 Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. 2026 Blue Peak Consulting Service Agreement (Board Portal) Page 381 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING ORGANIZATIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Event Agreement is entered into and effective as of this 1st day of January 2026 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the Edina Fire Department (“Client”), having an address of 6250 Tracy Ave, Edina, MN 55436 and Blue Peak Consulting (“Company”), having an address of 24 Luverne Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55419. In consideration of Client retaining Company to provide event services, it is agreed as follows: 1. SCOPE OF EVENT SERVICES Client hereby retains the Company to provide event services in the area of mental health and resilience at PAR360 from 01/01/26 until 12/31/26 (the “Event” of “Events”). (a) The services shall include the following: 1. Embedded Department Visits – Visits to the department up to twice per month; consultation, care, trainings, and support may be done during these visits. 2. Priority Care Coordination– Immediate expert assistance via a call line for referrals and resources. This can be conducted on site during embedded department visits or by phone when needed in between visits ensuring no one is left behind. 3. Individual Pre-Plan Meetings – Dedicated annual sessions for resilience pre-planning sessions with behavioral health providers familiar with firefighter challenges; these will be conducted on site during clinician visits. 4. Crisis Response – Response that focuses on building resiliency and communication after a traumatic event has occurred with department personnel; up to 40 hours that can be used annually. Additional hours needed that exceed 40 hours will be billed separately.* 5. Stress Management Modules– Online self-paced training modules for all department members. 6. Chief Consultation and Support – Ongoing direct line for Chiefs to mental health experts. Monthly Chief conference calls of all PAR360 member Chiefs to address concerns and issues unique to respective departments and provide networking and problem sharing/solving opportunities. (b) Additional services, beyond those described above, will require additional fees to be discussed and agreed upon by the parties. 2. CLIENT DUTIES (a) Compensation: In consideration for the services provided by Company to Client as set forth in paragraph 1 above, Client agrees to pay Company a total Event Fee of $26,250.00 (the “Event Fee”). Company’s obligation to render services hereunder is conditioned upon Client’s payment of said fee on a timely basis. *Additional crisis response hours that exceed 40 hours will be billed separately at $200 / hour. Page 382 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING (b) The Event Fee shall be paid according to the following schedule: i. Total Event fee will be broken into two equal payments over the course of the contract (50%; or $13,125.00) of the total Event Fee ($26,250.00). ii. Invoices will be submitted on or close to the following dates and are due within 30 days of invoice date: a. January 1st, 2026 b. July 1st, 2026 A lump sum payment of remainder balance of Total Event Fee can be made at any time with no penalty. (b) Late Payments: All payments due under this Agreement will be considered late and in arrears if not paid within ten (10) days of the due dates specified in Paragraph 1(a) and will become subject to a late penalty fee of 2.5% of the balance owed plus interest calculated at the annualized rate of 18% per annum, or 1.5% compounded monthly, or the maximum allowed by law. (c) Tools to be Provided by Client: Client agrees to provide all tools, information and documentation that may be required by the Company to effectively perform said responsibilities in connection with the performance of event services. (d) Travel Expenses: Client agrees to reimburse Company for travel expenses incurred by Company on Client’s behalf. These expenses include the following: airfare, transportation, all meals during the travel period and hotel (up to 2 nights). Both Client and Company will agree to the travel expenses prior to commencement. Company agrees to provide Client with a travel expense invoice, and Client agrees to make payment to Company within 60 days from the date of delivery of said travel expense invoice to Client. (e) Additional Client Duties: Client shall provide laptop, or other mechanism in which to project PowerPoint presentation materials, as well as a microphone and water for any in-person educational training events, at Client’s expense. 3. TERM This engagement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue through completion of the event services or cancellation by either party in accordance with paragraph 4. 4. CANCELLATION Client may cancel this Agreement for any reason by providing 30 days written notice to the Company. The Company will provide a 50% refund of the total Event Fee to Client, if cancellation is communicated to the Company within 30 days of the End of Subscription period. Client will not provide any refund to Page 383 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING Client if cancellation is communicated to the Company in less than 30 days of the End of Subscription Period. Cancellation of this Agreement by Client will not extinguish Client’s obligation to pay the travel expenses specified in Paragraph 2(d) and incurred by Company prior to the cancellation date. Company may cancel this Agreement at any time for any reason by providing written notice to Client. In the event that Company cancels this Agreement, Company will provide a full refund of the Event Fee paid. 5. NO GUARANTEES Company cannot guarantee the outcome of event services and Company’s comments about the outcome are expressions of opinion only. Company makes no guarantees other than that the services described in Paragraph 1(a) shall be provided to Client in accordance with the terms of this agreement. Client acknowledges that Company cannot guarantee any results for event services and such outcomes are based on subjective factors that cannot be controlled by Company. 6. CONFIDENTIALITY (a) Client Information: Any and all Client information and data of a confidential nature, including but not limited to any and all design, creative, marketing, sales, operating, performance, know how, business and process information (hereinafter referred to as “Confidential Information”), shall be treated by Company in the strictest confidence and not disclosed to third parties or used by Company for any purpose other than for providing Client with the services specified hereunder without Client’s express written consent. Confidential Information shall not include any information which (a) becomes available to the public through no breach of confidentiality by Company, (b) was in Company’s possession prior to receipt from the disclosure, (c) is received by Company independently from a third party free to disclose such information, or (d) is independently developed by Company without use of the Client’s Confidential Information. Upon request, Company hereto will promptly return or destroy all documents containing Confidential Information and delete all electronic records of or containing the same. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS (a) Independent Contractor Relationship: This Agreement shall not render Company an employee, partner, agent of or joint venturer with the Client for any purpose. Company is and will remain an independent contractor in its relationship to the Client. Company is or remains open to conducting similar tasks or activities for entities other than the Client and holds itself out to the public to be a separate business entity. Company shall retain sole and absolute discretion in the manner and means of carrying out the activities and responsibilities under this Agreement. Company shall be responsible to the ownership and management of the Client, but Company will not be required to follow or establish a regular or daily work schedule. Company will not rely solely on the equipment or offices of Client for completion of tasks and duties set forth pursuant to this Agreement. Any advice given to Company regarding services performed for the Client shall be considered a suggestion only, not an instruction. Client retains the right to inspect, stop or alter the work of Company to assure its conformity with this Agreement and Client needs. Company and Client agree to conform to any and all IRS tests necessary to establish and demonstrate the independent contractor relationship between Client and Company. Page 384 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING (b) Taxes & Benefits: Company will be responsible for filing its own tax returns and to pay taxes in accordance with all provisions of applicable Federal and State law. Client shall not be responsible for withholding taxes with respect to Company’s compensation. Company shall have no claim against Client for vacation pay, sick leave, retirement benefits, social security, worker’s compensation, health or disability benefits, unemployment insurance benefits or employee benefits of any kind. 8. LIMITED LICENSE The Company hereby grants to Client a limited license to use Company’s name, photograph, and likeness in, and in connection with advertising and promotional materials to promote this singular event. The Company also grants the Client a limited license to record Client’s Event and use the audio and/or video recording of the Event after the event for any purpose, provided that attribution of the content of the video is given to Company and no derivative works are created therefrom without prior written consent of the Company. 9. FORCE MAJEURE Neither party is liable for failure or delay in performance of the party's obligations under said agreement if such failure or delay in performance is as a result of causes and/or circumstances beyond the parties reasonable control and without its fault or negligence, including but not limited to accident, illness, Acts of God (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane, or other natural disaster) or of the Public Enemy, acts of war, acts of the government in its sovereign capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, unusually severe weather, terrorist activities, nationalization, government sanction, blockage, embargo, labor dispute, strike, lockout or interruption or failure of electricity or telephone service. Should any such occurrence impede or delay travel and execution of any obligation under said agreement, every reasonable effort will be made by both parties to mitigate, modify or alter said agreement as to meet their stated and agreed upon obligations. No party is entitled to terminate this Agreement under Paragraph 3 (Term) in such circumstances, except by mutual consent and agreement in writing pursuant to the Force Majeure provisions. If a party asserts Force Majeure as an excuse for failure to perform the party's obligation, then the nonperforming party must prove that the party took reasonable steps to minimize delay or damages caused by foreseeable events, that the party substantially fulfilled all non-excused obligations, and that the other party was timely notified of the likelihood or actual occurrence of an event described in in this Paragraph 10. Should Force Majeure render the need for Company's services null and void, each party to this contract agrees to terminate the contract amicably and bear their own expenses incurred to date unless otherwise indicated or specified. 10. WARRANTIES Page 385 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING (a) Company’s Warranties: Company represents, warrants and covenants that Company has full authority to enter into this Agreement and that all of the services, will be rendered using sound, professional practices and in a competent and professional manner by knowledgeable and qualified personnel. (b) Client’s Warranties: Client represents, warrants and covenants that Client has full authority to enter into this Agreement and has or will obtain, during all times relevant hereunder, all of the necessary consents, rights, licenses, clearances, releases or other permissions to lawfully consummate the transactions and lawfully discharge, in all material respects, each and every of Client’s obligations or duties set forth hereunder, whether performance is due now or hereafter during the Term. (c) EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THIS AGREEMENT, NEITHER PARTY MAKES ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. 11. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY With regard to the services to be performed by the Company pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the Company shall not be liable to Client, or to anyone who may claim any right due to any relationship with Client, for any acts or omissions in the performance of services on the part of the Company or on the part of the agents or employees of the Company, except when said acts or omissions of the Company are due to willful misconduct or gross negligence. The services provided by Blue Peak Consulting LLC DO NOT create a doctor-patient or therapist-patient relationship. Information provided DOES NOT create a doctor-patient or healthcare practitioner-patient relationship between you and Blue Peak Consulting LLC or its personnel. 12. EFFECT OF HEADINGS The subject headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION; WAIVER This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained in it and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations, and understandings of the parties. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 14. NEUTRAL CONSTRUCTION This Agreement was prepared by Company and/or Company’s legal counsel. It is expressly understood and agreed that this Agreement shall not be construed against Company merely because it was prepared Page 386 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING by its counsel; rather, each provision of this Agreement shall be construed in a manner which is fair to both parties. 15. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 16. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns; provided, however, that Client may not assign any of its rights under this Agreement, except to a wholly owned subsidiary entity of Client. No such assignment by Client to its wholly owned subsidiary shall relieve Client of any of its obligations or duties under this Agreement. The Company may assign its rights under this Agreement and make use of third party independent contractors to provide services only if mutually agreed upon by both Company and Client. 17. NOTICES All notices, requests, demands, and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the day after mailing if mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by first class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, and properly addressed as follows: To Company at: Blue Peak Consulting: 24 Luverne Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55419 To Client at: Edina Fire Department, 6250 Tracy Ave, Edina, MN 55436 Any party may change its address for purposes of this paragraph by giving the other parties written notice of the new address in the manner set forth above. 18. GOVERNING LAW; VENUE; MEDIATION; ARBITRATION This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Minnesota as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in Minnesota. The exclusive venue for any court proceeding based on or arising out of this Agreement shall be Ramsey County, Minnesota. The parties agree to attempt to resolve any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement by mediation, which shall be conducted under the then current mediation procedures of The CPR Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution or any other procedure upon which the parties may agree. The parties further agree that their respective good faith participation in mediation is a condition precedent to pursuing any other available legal or equitable remedy, arbitration, or other dispute resolution procedures. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute in mediation, the dispute shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Page 387 of 746 BLUE PEAK CONSULTING Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) shall be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 19. RECOVERY OF LITIGATION EXPENSES If any legal action or any arbitration or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresent in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it or they may be entitled. 20. SEVERABILITY If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the rest of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated. 21. SIGNATURES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed it on the day and year first above written. Blue Peak Consulting Edina Fire Department Signed: ____________________________________ Name: Margaret Gavian Title: Owner Date: _____________________________ Signed: ____________________________________ Name: _____________________________________ Title: _______________________________________ Date: ______________________________________ Page 388 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.17 Department: Fire Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Twila Singh, Organics Recycling Coordinator Item Title: Resolution 2026-04: Authorizing Approval of the 2026-2028 Residential Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Agreement with Hennepin County Action Requested: Approve Resolution 2026-04. Information/Background: This resolution is required by Hennepin County so the City of Edina can receive annual Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) grant funding. Resources/Financial Impacts: SCORE grant helps to fund outreach and education activities related to recycling and organics recycling. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Alignment with Climate Action Plan and waste reduction goals. Helps provide a foundational service to residents. Strong Foundation Values Impact: Engagement Funds are used for outreach and engagement events Equity Funded programming impacts those in multi-family and single family dwellings Stewardship Utilizing grant funding reduces City budget burden for programming Sustainability Funds help City work toward meeting multiple action items in the Climate Action Plan Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 389 of 746 Resolution 2026-04: Authorizing Approval of the 2026- 2028 Residential Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Agreement with Hennepin County Whereas pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115A.552, Counties shall ensure that residents have an opportunity to recycle; and Whereas Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires that each city implement and maintain a recycling and organics recycling program; and Whereas the Hennepin County Board at its November 6, 2025 meeting adopted a funding policy to continue to fund cities within Hennepin County for the contract period of January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2028; and Whereas in order to receive grant funds, the City must sign the agreement; and Whereas the City wishes to receive these grant funds each year. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City Council accepts the agreement as proposed. Now, therefore, be it further resolved that the Edina City Council authorizes the Mayor and the City Manager to execute such Residential Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Agreement with the County. Dated: January 20, 2026 Page 390 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.18 Department: Human Resources Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Rebecca Hardel, Assistant HR Director Item Title: 2026-2027 City and Local 49ers Union Contract Action Requested: Approve the 2026-2027 tentative agreement with IOUE Local 49ers. Information/Background: The below tentative agreement has been negotiated in good faith by City and Union leadership, and the union has voted to approve this contract. The last step in the process is approval by the City Council. Substantive changes to this contract include: • 2026 Market adjustment for Utilities and Mechanics Divisions • 3.0% General Wage Increase to all steps for 2027 • Transition of 3 current positions to Lead positions in Utilities, Streets and Concrete Staff recommends approval of this contract. TENTATIVE AGREEMENT December 18, 2025 Key: Bold = proposed new language Strike through = old language removed/replaced ARTICLE 2-RECOGNITIONS Add the following recognitions: Public Service Worker LEAD-Utilities Public Service Worker LEAD-Street Asphalt Public Service Worker LEAD-Street Concrete ARTICLE 3 – UNION SECURITY 3.1 The Employer agrees to deduct regular monthly Union dues in an amount designated by the Union from the pay of bargaining unit employees who authorize such a deduction in writing, and the Employer shall remit such dues directly to the Union as provided in this Article. In addition to the regular monthly Union dues, the Employer agrees to deduct a working dues assessment in the amount of one-half of one percent (1/2%) of the employee’s regular hourly wage for all hours worked up to 40 hours per week; effective January 1st, 2027. Page 391 of 746 The Employer agrees to rely on a certification from the Union identifying employees who have authorized the Employer to deduct such Union dues from their wages. Such authorization will be effective until the Union notifies the Employer that an employee has changed or canceled the employee’s authorization in writing in accordance with the terms of the original authorization. All dues money collected by the Employer through such deduction shall be remitted to the Union along with a reporting form which states the employee’s name, last four digits of social security number, hours worked, and amount of working dues deducted, to the Union’s office located at 2829 Anthony Lane South, Minneapolis, MN 55418 not later than the 15th day of the month following the month in which deductions were made. The City and the Union agree to a Memorandum of Understanding, which shall be drafted in 2026 to be effective 1-1-2027 incorporating the above language as City works to address system configuration to administer appropriately. ARTICLE 13 – VACATION LEAVE WITH PAY (Change to be reflected in Employee Handbook not CBA) Compensatory Time: Non-exempt employees may request the accrual of compensatory time (comp time) in lieu of approved overtime pay. Both the accrual and use of comp time require prior supervisor approval and must be recorded on timecards. If comp time is approved by the supervisor, one and one-half hours of comp time will be accrued for every hour of overtime worked. Accrued but unused comp time will be paid out at termination of employment. Employees may also choose to cash out comp time in November of each year. Any cash out will be paid at the rate that is in effect at the time of the cash out or termination from employment. The following limits for comp-time apply: • The maximum balance of comp time allowed is 80 hours. Once an employee reaches 80 hours of accrued comp time, further overtime will be paid in cash until the balance falls below 80. • Employees may accrue no more than 140 hours of comp time each calendar year. Once an employee has accrued 140 hours within a calendar year, all additional overtime will be paid. • Employees may use no more than 140 hours of comp time each year to replace scheduled time. Article 19 – UNIFORMS 19.1 The Employer shall provide eleven (11) uniforms and two (2) work jackets or equivalent clothing program equal to a Six Hundred Fifty Dollar ($650.00) funding level for each employee, subject to three conditions: Page 392 of 746 1. Employee must wear approved uniform. 2. Uniform shirt would have City identification on it. 3. Sleeved shirt and long pants are mandatory minimum uniform. 19.2 The Employer will provide up to Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250) per year per employee for the purchase of safety shoes and Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00) for safety glasses not provided in Section 19.1. ARTICLE 30 – INSURANCE 30.2 Effective January 1st, 2026, the city and the employee will split the premiums for the PFML program, on a 50/50 basis with the employee share payable through payroll deductions pursuant to Minn. Stat. 268B.14. ARTICLE 33 – DURATION This agreement shall be effective from January 1, 2026 and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2027. APPENDIX A-1 – WAGES Jan 1st, 2026: 2.5% Market Adjustment for Utilities and Mechanic Divisions $0.50 Market adjustment to Step 6 Wage for Street & Parks Divisions 3% increase to all steps and classifications Jan 1st, 2027: 3% increase to all steps and classifications Premium Pay Snow and Ice Emergency Pay: A premium pay of $4.25 per hour will be paid to Public Works and Park Maintenance, and Facilities employees for hours worked prior to the start of the regularly scheduled shift while engaged in emergency snow and ice control. This premium shall be subject to and adjusted as determined by the general wage increase in each respective year of this agreement. Certification Pay Increase Certified Playground Safety Inspector, Certified Pool Operator and Certified Sports Field Manager to $0.75/hour (still possessing a max of 2 certifications for Park Dept.) Lead Pay Lead positions for the Utilities and Streets Division shall be compensated at 10% above the highest applicable base rate of pay, currently (Step 6) for each respective classification. DISCUSSION ITEMS • Clean up any grammatical or numbering errors in the contract. Page 393 of 746 Renew all MOUs: • Central Pension Fund • Commercial Driver’s License • Health Care Savings Plan • Parks On-Call Program Resources/Financial Impacts: The tentative agreement results in ongoing wage and benefit cost increases beginning in 2026, with additional wage increase in 2027. The largest cost drivers are general wage increases, market adjustments, and transition of 3 positions to Lead positions. We are not adding to staffing levels. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Approval of this tentative labor agreement directly supports the City’s commitment to building a strong organizational foundation and delivering reliable, high-quality public services to residents. The agreement strengthens the City’s workforce stability, operational capacity, and long-term service delivery by investing in the employees who maintain essential infrastructure and provide day-to-day municipal services. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Equity The agreement promotes equity by ensuring fair, transparent, and market-aligned compensation. Stewardship The agreement demonstrates responsible stewardship of public resources. Strategic use of taxpayer dollars to maintain service quality while managing long-term financial risk. Sustainability A resilient organization positioned to deliver services effectively over the long term. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 394 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.19 Department: Human Resources Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Rebecca Hardel, Assistant HR Director Item Title: 2026-2027 City and Local 292 Electricians Union Contract Action Requested: Approve the 2026-2027 tentative agreement with Local 292 Information/Background: The below tentative agreement has been negotiated in good faith by City and Union leadership, and the union has voted to approve this contract. The last step in the process is approval by the City Council. Substantive changes to this contract include: • 2026 Market adjustment for Electricians • 3.0% General Wage Increase to all steps for 2027 Staff recommends approval of this contract. Key: Bold = proposed new language Strike through = old language removed/replaced Article 10.5 - Overtime PayWhen employee exceeds fourteen (14) twelve (12) hours continuous service, all hours in excess of fourteen (14) twelve (12) hours will be paid at double the base rate. Article 17.3 - Uniforms And Personal Protective EquipmentThe Employer will provide up to Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250) per year per employee for the purchase of safety toed shoes and Twenty- Five ($25.00) Thirty-Five ($35.00) for prescription safety glasses not provided in section 17.1 Article 20- Wage Rate January 1, 2026- $58.24 (3% Market Adjustment + 3% General Wage Adjustment) January 1, 2027-$60.29 (0.5% Market Adjustment + 3% General Wage Adjustment) Article 33- DurationThis Agreement shall be effective January 1,2026, and shall remain in effect until the 31st day of December 2027. ARTICLE 24 - SENIORITY 24.1 Seniority will be the determining criterion for transfers, promotions and lay-offs only when all job-relevant qualification factors are equal. Page 395 of 746 24.2 Seniority will be the determining criterion for recall when the job-relevant qualification factors are equal. Recall rights under this provision will continue for twenty-four (24) months after lay- off. Recalled employees shall have ten (10) working days after notification of recall by registered mail at the employee’s last known address to report to work or forfeit all recall rights. Clean up any grammatical or numbering errors in the contract. Renew MOA for Terry Klapperick Renew Health Care Savings Plan MOU Resources/Financial Impacts: The tentative agreement results in ongoing wage and benefit cost increases beginning in 2026, with additional wage increase in 2027. The largest cost drivers are general wage increases and market adjustments. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: A strong foundation depends on a skilled, supported, and sustainable workforce. This agreement advances that goal by offering competitive wages and market corrections. By having the right people in the right roles, the city can provide reliable services to maintain critical infrastructure. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Values Impact: Equity The agreement promotes equity by ensuring fair, transparent, and market-aligned compensation. Stewardship The agreement demonstrates responsible stewardship of public resources. Strategic use of taxpayer dollars to maintain service quality while managing long-term financial risk. Sustainability A resilient organization positioned to deliver services effectively over the long term. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 396 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 6.20 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk Item Title: Summary Publication for Ordinances 2025-16, 2025-18 and 2025-19 Action Requested: Approve summary publication for ordinances 2025-16, 2025-18 and 2025-19. Information/Background: State Statute requires that the City publish all approved ordinances within 45 days of approval in its official newspaper. If the ordinance is lengthy or contains charts/maps, State Statute allows cities to choose to publish a summary of the ordinance. Supporting Documentation: None Page 397 of 746 Summary Publication for Ordinances 2025-16, 2025-18 and 2025-19 The summary publication for the ordinances is as follows: CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCES 2025-16, 2025-18, AND 2025-19 Ordinance 2025-16: Amending Chapter 2 of the Edina City Code Effective Jan. 1, 2026, fees relating to Chapters 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 28 described in Schedule A of Chapter 2 have been amended. Oridnance 2025-18: Amending Chapter 4 Alcoholic Beverages Effective Dec. 16, 2025, amendments to Chapter 4 primarily remove outdated requirements, streamline licensing processes, and provide operational flexibility while preserving the City’s authority to review and regulate liquor establishments. Ordinance 2025-19: Amending Chapter 2 of the Edina City Code concerning Administration, Article 3. Boards, Committees, and Commissions Effective Dec. 16, 2025, amendments to Chapter 2, Article III clarify the advisory role of commissions, incorporates the work plan process, establishes an attendance appeal process, and streamlines minutes procedures while maintaining public access to official records. The full ordinances are available by contacting the City Clerk at sallison@edinamn.gov. Approved for summary publication by the Edina City Council: January 20, 2026 Page 398 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 7.1 Department: Administration Item Activity: Information Prepared By: Kari Sinning, Deputy City Clerk Item Title: Edina Football State Championship Recognition Action Requested: Recognize and congratulate the Edina football team for their 2025 State Championship win. Information/Background: The Edina football team won the State Championship in their class 6A division on November 21, 2025. Supporting Documentation: None Page 399 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 7.2 Department: Public Works Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Title: Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 26-30, 2026 Action Requested: Adopt Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 26-30, 2026. Information/Background: The City joins other local governments across the region in celebrating January 26–30 as Winter Salt Week. Winter Salt Week is intended to raise awareness and urge all residents, businesses, and city departments to take part in activities and initiatives that promote the responsible use of de-icing salt and encourage the adoption of winter maintenance strategies which maintain safety while reducing environmental harm. Resources/Financial Impacts: No fiscal or capacity impact. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: Responsible use of de-icing salt and adoption of winter maintenance strategies maintains safety while reducing environmental harm. Reliable Service Livable City Values Impact: Engagement Everyone has a part to play in staying safe while reducing salt overuse. Community events and programs increase knowledge about the issue and potential solutions. Stewardship Reducing overuse of salt reduces infrastructure damage from corrosion without compromising safety. Sustainability Reducing overuse of salt protects water without compromising safety. Page 400 of 746 Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). None Page 401 of 746 Proclamation: Winter Salt Week January 26-30, 2026 Whereas, the City of Edina relies on de-icing salt as part of its winter maintenance program to maintain safe and accessible roadways; and Whereas, all the salt applied to roadways ends up in our freshwater; and Whereas, chloride contamination from de-icing salt has been found in lakes, streams, and groundwater in Edina’s Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek watersheds and across the state; and Whereas, reducing overuse of de-icing salt reduces damage to infrastructure and property, protects freshwater resources, and reduces harm to aquatic plants and animals; and Whereas, it is crucial to raise awareness among residents, businesses, and local government agencies about the responsible use of de-icing salt to protect both public safety and the long-term health of our freshwater resources; and Whereas, Winter Salt Week provides an opportunity to educate our community about the responsible use of de-icing salt, including environmental considerations and effective application methods; and Whereas, the residents of Edina can contribute to de-icing salt pollution reduction efforts locally by learning about smart salting practices, engaging in safe winter driving, hiring trained service providers, and participating in the ‘Low Salt, No Salt, Minnesota’ program; and Whereas, the City is committed to promoting a sustainable approach to winter maintenance for the benefit of present and future generations. Now, therefore, the Edina City Council, proclaims January 26-30, 2026 as Winter Salt Week in the City of Edina and urge all residents, businesses, and city departments to take part in activities and initiatives that promote the responsible use of de-icing salt and encourage the adoption of winter maintenance strategies which maintain safety while reducing environmental harm. Date: January 20, 2026 Page 402 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 8.1 Department: Community Development Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Item Title: Conditional Use Permit with Variances: 4201 W. 50th St. Action Requested: Close online input January 25th and continue action to the February 3rd City Council meeting. Information/Background: The subject property, 4201 W. 50th Street, is approximately 1.15 acres and is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of W 50th Street and Indianola Avenue. Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion preschool is requesting a conditional use permit to continue operating the existing church property at 4201 W 50th Street as a place of worship and a licensed early childhood education center. The proposed church use has been present on the site since the church was originally developed in 1955 (date of building construction per Hennepin County). A licensed childcare center started alongside the church during the 1990s. The church closed in Winter of 2023 and there has not been a church or school in operation since. The city has no record of a conditional use permit. Due to the use stopping in 2023, a conditional use permit is required for a church and school use to continue on site. In addition to the conditional use permit, variances are required for the number of parking spaces on site and for the size lot for a church use and daycare use on site. No exterior changes are proposed with the request. The applicant will be utilizing the existing building and parking areas. Better Together Public Input Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. Planning Commission Staff Report 2. Staff Presentation-Mis Amigos (Includes site plan, landscape plan, site photos) 3. Applicant Submittal (Board Portal) 4. Traffic Study-Executive Summary 5. Traffic and Parking Study-additional information (Board Portal) 6. Traffic and Parking Study (Board Portal) Page 403 of 746 Staff Report Date: 12/10/25 To: PLANNING COMMISSION From: Emily Dalrymple, Assistant City Planner Subject: Conditional Use Permit with parking stall variances and lot size variances for Mis Amigos at 4201 W. 50th Street Staff Recommendation: Motion to approve a conditional use permit and variance for parking and lot size for a religious institution and school at 4201 W 50th Street subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Information/Background: The subject property, 4201 W. 50th Street, is approximately 1.15 acres and is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of W 50th Street and Indianola Avenue. Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion preschool is requesting a conditional use permit to continue operating the existing church property at 4201 W 50th Street as a place of worship and a licensed early childhood education center. The proposed church use has been present on the site since the church was originally developed in 1955 (date of building construction per Hennepin County). A licensed childcare center started alongside the church during the 1990s. The church closed in Winter of 2023 and there has not been a church or school in operation since. The city has no record of a conditional use permit. Due to the use stopping in 2023, a conditional use permit is required for a church and school use to continue on site. In addition to the conditional use permit, variances are required for the number of parking spaces on site and for the size lot for a church use and daycare use on site. No exterior changes are proposed with the request. The applicant will be utilizing the existing building and parking areas. Surrounding Land Uses: Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Apartment building; zoned PRD-5 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Two Unit residential homes; zoned R-2 Double Dwelling Unit and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features: Page 404 of 746 Staff Report The subject property is a 49,993 square foot, 1.15-acre lot located at the southwest corner of W. 50th Street and Indianola Avenue. The property consists of an existing church building, existing play area and existing parking lot. There are no proposed exterior changes to the building or parking area. Planning: Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District Compliance Table: City Standard Proposed Parking Spaces-Church* 83 spaces 71 spaces* Parking Spaces-Daycare 33 spaces 71 spaces Lot Size-Religious Institution* 3 acres 1.15 acres* Lot Size-Daycare, preschool facility* 2 acres 1.15 acres* *Requires a variance (existing conditions) Traffic and Parking: There is no change to the site access or circulation. The site has access off Indianola Avenue and Jay Place. Stantec conducted a traffic study for the site and proposed uses. The traffic study concludes that the trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Based on the City Code requirements 83 parking spaces are required for the church/religious institution use and 33 spaces are required for the daycare/preschool use. The site continues to have 71 parking spaces available. No additional parking spaces are proposed with the application. Based on the code requirements a parking variance of 12 parking spaces is required for the church/religious institution use. Stantec conducted a parking study for the site and proposed uses. The parking study concludes that the parking provided is adequate for the daycare/preschool use. The study found that with a maximum occupancy event of 276 people (the seating capacity of the largest assembly space), the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The traffic study recommends that the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. This site has previously been used as a church/religious institution and no parking complaints for the site have been received. Page 405 of 746 Staff Report Conditional Use Permit Review: A conditional use is a use allowed by the zoning ordinance, subject to conditions. Unlike permitted uses, conditional uses require review by the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council. Typically, conditional uses are those that may only be allowed under certain criteria or may have impacts that may need to be accounted for. Per Section 36-306, the City may impose conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, operation or duration of the use, as deemed necessary for the protection of the public interest and adjacent properties, to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter (zoning) and other applicable provisions of this Code, and to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Council may require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary to secure compliance with any conditions imposed. No use shall be established or maintained, and no building or other permit for establishing or maintaining such use shall be granted, until the applicant has met and fulfilled all conditions imposed by the council to the satisfaction of the planner. Section 36-305 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance states that the Council shall not grant a conditional use permit, unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on government facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The proposed use is a use that has been in existence since the property was developed in the 50’s. The scale of the church and school uses are not changing and no exterior changes are proposed with the current application. The religious institution and daycare/preschool use will not have any noticeable impact on government facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements. 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; A parking study was completed for the City by Stantec, and it was found that the proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; Staff does not foresee any adverse impacts on the public health, safety or welfare resulting from the proposed use. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The use should have no impact on the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located, as imposed by this chapter; and No changes are proposed to the exterior of the building or parking lot layout. The applicant is proposing additional landscaping around the existing playground area. There are variances associated with the applicant’s proposal; for Page 406 of 746 Staff Report parking and for lot size. With the exception of those variances, staff believes the use complies with all other aspects of the zoning ordinance. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed application is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan. Variance Review: Are the proposed variances justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1. Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The application allows the property owner to continue to the use of the property as it has been used since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. The size of the lot, the proposed uses, and the number of parking spaces are not changing. 2. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The proposed application allows the use to continue on the subject property. This is not a new use and no exterior changes are proposed to the building, lot size or parking areas. This is not applicable to other property in the vicinity. 3. There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The need for a variance is unique to the property and is not self-created by the applicant. This property and use has been in existence since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. 4. Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No, the proposed variances would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The property would continue to be used as a church/religious institution and preschool/daycare as it has since it was developed in the 1950’s. There is no exterior changes to the building or parking lot associated with the proposal. Page 407 of 746 Staff Report Recommended Action: Staff recommend approval of the requested conditional use permit and associated variances. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use meets all conditions to grant a conditional use permit. 2. The project does not have an undue adverse impact on government facilities, utilities, or services. 3. The proposed project will have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. 4. The project does not have an undue adverse impact on public health, safety or welfare. 5. The project will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. 6. The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 7. The application meets the variance criteria for the parking variance and lot size variance. 8. The application allows the property owner to continue the use of the property as it has been used since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. The size of the lot, the proposed uses, and the number of parking spaces are not changing. 9. The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner is required to develop a parking plan that identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site during a maximum occupancy event. 2. The property owner is required to submit a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan. Page 408 of 746 EdinaMN.gov 4201 W 50th Street West Conditional Use Permit with Variances EdinaMN.gov Page 409 of 746 Existing Page 410 of 746 Survey Page 411 of 746 Site Plan Page 412 of 746 Landscape Plan Page 413 of 746 Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested conditional use permit and associated variances. Approval is based on the following findings: •The proposed use meets all conditions to grant a conditional use permit. •The project does not have an undue adverse impact on government facilities, utilities, or services. •The proposed project will have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. •The project does not have an undue adverse impact on public health, safety or welfare. •The project will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity. •The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. •The application meets the variance criteria for the parking variance and lot size variance. •The application allows the property owner to continue the use of the property as it has been used since it was originally developed in the 1950’s. The size of the lot, the proposed uses, and the number of parking spaces are not changing. •The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: •The property owner is required to develop a parking plan that identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site during a maximum occupancy event. •The property owner is required to submit a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan. •Request the City’s Traffic Safety Committee review the potential for a crosswalk across W 50th Street at Arden Avenue. Page 414 of 746 Daycare Drop Off/Pick Up Location Page 415 of 746 Narrative Statement for Conditional Use Permit Property: 4201 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Reason for Conditional Use Permit Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion Preschool is seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to continue operating the existing church property at 4201 W 50th St. as a place of worship and to add a licensed early childhood education center. This proposal maintains the long-standing character and use of the site, which has been a fixture of West 50th Street since 1946. Although zoning laws have evolved over time, our intent is simple: to continue using the property for its original purpose as a space that serves and strengthens the community—through both worship and the education and care of young children. Background and History of the Property The property was originally constructed and operated as a church beginning in 1946. In the 1950s, the church expanded the building and vacated nearby alleys to accommodate its addition. During the 1990s, the site also hosted a licensed childcare center alongside church operations. The church closed in December 2023, and the property was listed for sale in hopes of finding another faith-based user. After an initial sale fell through, the property was relisted in 2025. Mis Amigos was selected in a competitive bid process because our proposal preserves the building, continues its use for worship, and adds a licensed childcare program that benefits local families. Other bidders included a childcare operator that planned to demolish the building to its foundation and a multi-family housing developer. We believe our approach—preserving the existing structure and its long-standing use—is the most responsible and community-friendly path forward. We are requesting that the City reinstate the previous conditional use permit, which recently lapsed due to the closure of Mercy Commons Church. Zoning Context (R-1 District) The property is zoned R-1, which allows both religious institutions and childcare centers with a Conditional Use Permit. ● Lot area: The site totals 1.12 acres. While this is less than the 2-acre minimum for childcare centers and 3-acre minimum for religious institutions, there is no available adjacent land to expand the parcel. ● Setbacks: The building meets the 30’ front setback requirement and maintains existing nonconforming setbacks on other sides (26.8’, 7.6’, and 24.8’). We are not altering the footprint or shape of the building, nor decreasing any setbacks. Without demolishing the existing structure, these conditions cannot be modified, making reinstatement of the CUP the reasonable and practical solution. Parking and Lot Coverage The property’s impervious surface coverage is 45%, below the 50% limit for the zoning district. ● Religious use: The sanctuary seats 276 people, requiring 92 spaces by code; the existing 53-space lot has historically accommodated church operations without issue. ● Childcare use: State requirements call for 1 space per employee and 1 per 20 children. We anticipate approximately 25 employees and 7 additional spaces for parents—well within the lot’s capacity. Page 416 of 746 ● The current parking lot has supported both church and childcare uses in the past, demonstrating it can adequately do so again. At some point in the property’s history, the church began using a portion of the adjacent alleyway as part of its parking layout. The alley provides access only to the garage of one neighboring home and to the church itself. The parking lot aisles are striped to maintain open access to the neighbor’s garage at all times, and this arrangement has functioned smoothly for many years. The church previously had an agreement with the homeowner to ensure their needs were fully met, and the current property owner supports this sale and proposed use. We intend to maintain this respectful and cooperative relationship going forward. Conclusion As a 16-year Edina resident and owner of Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion Preschool, I am deeply committed to enhancing our community while respecting its history and character. This project continues the property’s legacy as a place of service and learning, preserves a beloved neighborhood landmark, and provides a valuable resource for local families. We respectfully request approval of this Conditional Use Permit to allow both continued worship and licensed childcare operations at 4201 W 50th St. Page 417 of 746 10/29/2025 Dawn Uribe 5353 Wayzata Blvd. Ste 30 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 City of Edina Planning Division 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To Whom it May Concern, Mis Amigos Spanish Immersion Preschool intends to use this property as a licensed early childhood education center serving children ages 0-5. Our program provides full-time Spanish immersion preschool and childcare in a nurturing, culturally rich environment. We plan to preserve the existing building, including the sanctuary space (which will continue to be rented to a church on Sundays), while updating the interior to meet state childcare requirements. Founded in 2001, Mis Amigos is Minnesota’s oldest Spanish immersion preschool and has successfully expanded to multiple locations across the Twin Cities. Instruction is 100% in Spanish, creating an authentic immersion experience that fosters bilingual development through play, learning, and daily interaction. As a 16-year Edina resident, I’m deeply invested in bringing this program to my own community. Mis Amigos has built a strong reputation for high-quality care, integrity, and respect for the neighborhoods we serve. We believe this location will be a positive addition to Edina, maintaining the character of the property while providing a valuable service for local families. Thank you, Dawn Uribe Page 418 of 746 Relieves practical difficulties created by the lot’s historic configuration and size while keeping the building intact. The property’s size and layout were established long before current zoning standards were adopted. The existing lot (1.12 acres) cannot meet today’s minimum acreage or setback requirements for childcare or religious use without demolishing or significantly altering the building. Reinstating the Conditional Use Permit allows us to maintain and use the structure as it was originally built, avoiding unnecessary demolition while keeping the building’s footprint and neighborhood presence unchanged. Addresses extraordinary circumstances unique to this long-established property that predate current zoning requirements. This building has been part of the neighborhood since 1946, serving as a church and community gathering place for nearly 80 years. Its configuration, setbacks, and lot size reflect standards from that era and cannot be replicated under current zoning. These are unique, site-specific circumstances that warrant flexibility. Renewing the Conditional Use Permit recognizes the property’s long-standing institutional use and allows it to continue serving the community in a compatible way. Aligns with the intent of the zoning ordinance by preserving community-serving institutional use within a residential area. Both churches and childcare centers are recognized by the zoning code as appropriate community-serving uses in residential districts when approved under a Conditional Use Permit. This proposal continues those same uses—faith and education—within the existing building, maintaining the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The property will remain a quiet, neighborhood-based institution that strengthens the community without introducing commercial activity or incompatible development. Maintains the character of the neighborhood by retaining the existing structure, protecting its architectural legacy, and ensuring quiet, daytime-oriented activity consistent with the property’s historic use. We intend to preserve the building’s exterior and architectural character, which has long been part of the West 50th Street landscape. The sanctuary will remain a worship space, while weekday childcare use will bring gentle, daytime activity similar in scale and rhythm to previous church and preschool operations. This approach keeps the neighborhood’s look and feel intact while ensuring the property continues to be a welcoming, low-impact community space. Page 419 of 746 Page 420 of 746 W 50TH STREETINDIANOLA AVEALLEYXX3' WIDE SWING DOOR(TYP)4' HIGH CHINLINK FENCE (TYP)58.77' EXISTING PLAYGROUNDEXISTINGCONCRETE WALKEXISTING WOODPRIVACY FENCESTORM EASEMENTRIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTEXISTING MONUMENTSIGNEXISTING CHAIN LINKFENCE4' HIGH CHINLINK FENCE (TYP)27.84'36'STORMEASEMENTSTORM EASEMENTEXISTINGWOOD MULCHPLAYGROUND3' WIDESWING DOOR(TYP)EXISTING PLANTERBOXES (TYP)6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RA1SITE PLAN1" = 20'C-101SITE PLANVSC25001PROJECT NO.SITE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL11/26/25SITE PLAN REVIEW10/30/25NOT FORCONSTRUCTION MIS AMIGOSPLAYGROUND4201 50TH STREETEDINA, MINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREVISIONDATEISSUEPROJECTD E S I G NCIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990123456EDCBA NOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwas prepared by me, or under my direct supervisionand that i am a duly Licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the State of MINNESOTA.Marcelle J. Weslock4232310/30/2025REGISTRATION NO.DATEVAN SICKLECONSTRUCTION6140 LAKEWOOD TRAIL,NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071C/O GREG SICKLE612-226-9618LEGENDEXISTING WOOD MULCH AND PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENTSITE PLAN NOTES1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BYBONNEMA RUNKE STERN, INC., MINNESOTA ON OCTOBER 28, 2025 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT.ELAN DESIGN LAB CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION.VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IFANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIRCONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT INADDITIONAL COST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY AREDISCOVERED SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERINGUN-WITNESSED WORK SHALL RESULT IN REJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.3.VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IFANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIRCONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.PROJECT SUMMARYZONED: R-1 SINGLE DWELLING UNITAREA SUMMARYLOT AREA 49,993 SF. (1.148 AC.) EXISTING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 35,054 SF. (70%) 35,054 SF. (70%) BUILDINGS 9,085 SF. (18%) 9,085 SF. (18%)PARKING, WALK, & TRASH 25,969 SF. (52%) 26,669 SF. (52%)PERVIOUS AREA14,939 SF. (30%) 14,939 SF. (30%)PARKING SUMMARYTOTAL PARKING 71 STALLS 2 ACCESSIBLE STALLS69 STANDARD STALLSPERVIOUSPage 421 of 746 W 50TH STREETINDIANOLA AVEALLEYEXISTINGCONCRETE WALKEXISTING WOOD PRIVACY FENCESTORM EASEMENTRIGHT-OF-WAYEASEMENTEXISTING MONUMENT SIGNEXISTING PLANTING BEDEXISTINGTREEINSTALL TREE 5'MIN. FROMPROPERTY LINE(TYP)SOD RESTORATIONAS NEEDEDA1L-102INSTALL TREES AT 20' MIN.FROM POWER POLEEXISTING CHAIN LINKTREE PLANTING(TYP)C5L-102EXISTING PLANTINGBEDVERIFY EXISTING UTILIITTYLOCATIONS AND INSTALL TREE10' MIN. FROM UTILIITIES(TYP)STORM EASEMENTXX6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RA1LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 20'L-101LANDSCAPEPLANLANDSCAPE NOTESLANDSCAPE SUMMARYSEC. 36-1407-36-1435 LANDSCAPEREQUIREDPROPOSEDOVERSTORY TREE1 TREE/ 40 LF LOT PERIMETERCREDITS OF 2 EXISTING TREES1,154 LF = 29 TREES9 NEW OVERSTORY TREESUNDERSTORY TREES & SHRUBSADDITIONAL TO LANDSCAPE TREATMENT2 ORNAMENTAL TREES & 32 SHRUBSSEC. 36-1457 SCREENINGZONED R-1 10' HIGH SCREENED FROM R-1 DISTRICT WITHIN 200'NEW OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREESNONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGNOT EXTENDED ACROSS STREET& SHRUB/ PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDSOFF-STREET PARKING SCREENED FROM RESIDENTIAL LOT & STREETEXISTING PRIVACY FENCEWITHIN 50'TRASH & MECHANICAL EQUIP.SCREENED FROM ALL LOT LINES & STREETN/ASUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, COORDINATE SUBSTITUTION AND REQUIREMENTSWITH OWNER. SUBMIT WRITTEN DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS FORAPPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND/OR INSTALLATION.PLANT SCHEDULEVSC25001PROJECT NO.SITE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL11/26/25SITE PLAN REVIEW10/30/25NOT FORCONSTRUCTION MIS AMIGOSPLAYGROUND4201 50TH STREETEDINA, MINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREVISIONDATEISSUEPROJECTD E S I G NCIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990123456EDCBA NOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, orunder my direct supervision, and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of thestate of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee SaraithongREGISTRATION NO.10/30/2025DATE45059VAN SICKLECONSTRUCTION6140 LAKEWOOD TRAIL,NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071C/O GREG SICKLE612-226-96181.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUSTENSURE THAT THE FINAL GRADES ARE MET AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORRESOLUTION.2.ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THE CURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OFNURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION.3.QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACEPLANTS IN PROPER SPACING FOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES.4.TOPSOIL TO BE MNDOT 3877.2B LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANTING BEDS. PROVIDE ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROW MNDOT 3877.2E FORPLANT RESTORATION, WATER QUALITY AND INFILTRATION PLANTING. SPREAD TOPSOIL AT MINIMUM 4" OF ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION.5.PLANTING SOIL TO BE CONSISTED OF 50% SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (MNDOT 3877) AND 50% GRADE 2 COMPOST (MNDOT 3890). PLANTING SOIL TO HAVE A PHBETWEEN 6.5-7.5, BE FREE OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS, DEBRIS, LARGE ROCKS GREATER THAN 1/ 2" DIAMETER, AND FRAGMENTS OF WOOD. SUBSOIL SHALL BESCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 4" BEFORE PLANTING SOIL IS SPREAD.6.SPREAD PLANTING SOIL AT MINIMUM EIGHTEEN (18) INCH DEEP IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO PLANTING. THOROUGHLY WATER TWICE TO FACILITATECONSOLIDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING. DO NOT OVERLY COMPACT SOIL.7.SOD SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE INSTALLED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SOD TO BE MNDOT 3878.2A, DENSE, AND OF UNIFORM TEXTURE, FREE OFWEEDS AND DISEASE. APPLY MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND THOROUGHLY APPLY FERTILIZER TO TOP TWO (2) INCHES BEFORE LAYINGSOD. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN SODDED AREAS IN HEALTHY CONDITION UNTIL FIRMLY ROOTED.8.MULCH TO BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (MNDOT 3882 TYPE 6), CONSISTED OF RAW WOOD MATERIAL FROM TIMBER AND BE A PRODUCT OF AMECHANICAL CHIPPER, HAMMER MILL, OR TUB GRINDER. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY FREE OF MOLD, DIRT, SAWDUST, AND FOREIGN MATERIAL ANDSHALL NOT BE IN AN ADVANCED STATE OF DECOMPOSITION. THE MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN CHIPPED UP MANUFACTURED BOARDS OR CHEMICALLY TREATEDWOOD, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WATER BOARD, PARTICLE BOARD, AND CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) OR PENTA TREATED WOOD. THE MATERIALSHALL BE TWICE-GROUND/ SHREDDED, SUCH THAT; NO INDIVIDUAL PIECE SHALL EXCEED 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION.9.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RING AROUND ALL TREES. MAINTAIN MULCH AWAY FROM THETREE TRUNK. NO ALUMINUM EDGING IS REQUIRED.10.EDGE ALL SHRUB BEDS WITH 3/ 16" X 5.5" MILL FINISHED ALUMINUM EDGING WITH STAKES. ALL EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE.11.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB BED AREAS AND APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARKMULCH IN PERENNIAL AREAS.12.APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF 1 - 1 1/2 INCH RIVER ROCK MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER FABRIC IN AREAS INDICATED ON PLAN.13.PLACE 6" - 8" RIVER BOULDER ALONG CREEK PERIMETER AND BURY TO 1/3 DEPTH OF ROCK SIZE.14.WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE BLACK POLYPROPYLENE SHEET 5 OZ/SQ.YD. TENSILE STRENGTH PER ASTM D-4632, PRODUCT BY DEWITT COMPANY OR APPROVEDEQUAL.15.FERTILIZER TO BE A COMMERCIAL FORMULA AND APPLIED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE FERTILIZER WITH PERCENTAGE OF NITROGENREQUIRED TO PROVIDE NOT LESS THAN 1 POUND OF ACTUAL NITROGEN PER 1,000 SQ.FT. OF LAWN AND 10 PERCENT OF POTASSIUM. NITROGEN MUST BE IN A FORMAVAILABLE TO LAWN DURING THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT. PROVIDE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER 20-10-5 FOR TREES AND SHRUBS.16.FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.17.ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS AS INDICATED ON PLAN SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEM TOCOVER ALL PLANTING. NO WATER IS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND SUBMITSHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASING AND INSTALLATION.IRRIGATION DESIGN IS TO MEET ALL CITY AND STATE PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS.18.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTS IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD IS TWO FULL YEARS FROMDATE OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY PERIOD FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED AFTER JUNE 1ST SHALL COMMENCE THEFOLLOWING YEAR.QUANT.KEYCOMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAMESIZEROOTCOND.DECIDUOUS TREESMATURESIZE2B&B2.5" CAL.SHRUBS25'H X 25'WPERENNIALS24" HT.4'H X 4'WPOTSYRINGA MEYERI'PALIBIN'DWARF KOREANLILAC2124" HT.2'H X 3'WPOTSPIRAEAFRITSCHIANAFRITSCH SPIREA111 GAL2'H X 2'WPOTSALVIA NEMOROSA'BLUE BY YOU'BLUE BY YOUSALVIA723B&B2.5" CAL.45' X 30'W1 GAL3'H X 2'WPOTCALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER'KARL FOERSTERFEATHER REED GRASS7ORNAMENTAL TREES2B&B2.0" CAL.20'H X 12'WMALUS IOENSIS'PRAIRIE ROSE'PRAIRIE ROSEFLOWERING CRABAPPLEACER X FREEMANII'AF#1'FIREFALLMAPLEB&B3.5" CAL.50' X 40'WQUERCUS BICOLORSWAMP WHITEOAKSYRINGA RETICULATAJAPANESE TREE LILAC**SUBSTITUTED FOR PLANTINGNEAR POWER POLE2B&B2.5" CAL.35' X 12'WACER RUBRUM'RED ROCKET'RED ROCKETRED MAPLE1 GAL2'H X 2'WPOT10SPOROBOLUSHETEROLEPISPRAIRIE DROPSEEDLEGENDFALL ATTENUATION PADDED UNDERLAYMENTARTIFICIAL TURFFIBER WOOD CHIP PLAY SURFACEDRY CREEKPage 422 of 746 TREE PLANTING(TYP)C5L-102SHRUB PLANTING (TYP)C3L-102EDGING ATPLANTING BED(TYP)C3L-102SOD ATHARDSCAPE(TYP)A5L-102PERENNIAL PLANTING(TYP)A3L-102EXISTING TREEINSTALL EDGING 4"EAST OF FENCE (TYP)EXISTING PLAYGROUND27.1'INSTALL EDGING 4"EAST OF FENCE(TYP)XXXXXXXX3010SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RL-102ENLARGEDLANDSCAPE PLANVSC25001PROJECT NO.SITE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL11/26/25SITE PLAN REVIEW10/30/25NOT FORCONSTRUCTION MIS AMIGOSPLAYGROUND4201 50TH STREETEDINA, MINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREVISIONDATEISSUEPROJECTD E S I G NCIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE310 4TH AVE SOUTH, SUITE 1006MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990123456EDCBA NOT FORCONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, orunder my direct supervision, and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect under the laws of thestate of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee SaraithongREGISTRATION NO.10/30/2025DATE45059VAN SICKLECONSTRUCTION6140 LAKEWOOD TRAIL,NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071C/O GREG SICKLE612-226-9618A1ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 10'C5TREE PLANTINGNO SCALETREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCHMOUND SUBGRADESCARIFY BOTTOM PRIORTO PLANTINGCUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.),WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE,40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAPPLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLDUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLMULCH DISHSEE WIDTH ON LANDSCAPE NOTEMULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE ORFIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOTAT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINEDOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE& 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREEINTERVALSNOTESMAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD(SEE SPECIFICATIONS).TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONALTO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARESHOWN.ONE FLAG PER WIRE COMPACT PLANTING SOIL85% MAX.PLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)EDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)PLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOMPRIOR TO PLANTINGMULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADEMAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTSEDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SEE PLAN AND PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING12" MIN.4" MIN.PROVIDE PLANTING BED12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSHOLD SODDED AREA 1" BELOWPAVING SURFACETEMP SOIL AROUND SOIL BALL TO PREVENTTREE SHIFTINGREMOVE ALL POT AND ALL PLASTICLOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTINGB3SHRUB PLANTINGNO SCALEC3EDGING AT PLANTING BEDNO SCALEA3PERENNIAL PLANTINGNO SCALEA5SOD AT HARDSCAPE EDGENO SCALE8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDEOF PREVAILING WINDLOOSEN ROOTSPRIOR TO PLANTING18" MIN.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOMPRIOR TO PLANTING12" MIN.PROVIDE PLANTING BED12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSSET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADEMAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTSTOPSOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)PLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)TOP OF EDGING TO BE MAXIMUM1/2" ABOVE SURFACE MATERIAL12" MIN.PROVIDE PLANTING BED12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSINSTALL STAKES PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATIONGUILDLINESTOP OF MULCH BELOW TOPOF PAVEMENT24" MIN. TO PAVEMENT4" - 6"SCARIFY SIDES OF PITPRIOR TO PLANTING PLANTING SOILWATER & TAMP TOREMOVE AIR POCKETS4" MIN. 18" MIN.6" MIN.6" MIN.Page 423 of 746 Edina Mis Amigos – Occupancy 11/25/2025 Formally Mercy Commons Covenant Church 4201 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 A3 Church Occupancy Main Level seating in pews 201 Occ. Choir seating 25 Occ. Balcony seating in pews 48 Occ. Pastor & Organist 2 Occ. Total 276 Occ. I-4 Child Daycare Occupancy 6 Main Level Classrooms 85 Occ. 5 Lower Level Classrooms 61 Occ. Daycare StaƯ & Assistants 25 Occ. Total 171 Occ. Page 424 of 746 Page 425 of 746 Page 426 of 746 Page 427 of 746 Page 428 of 746 Page 429 of 746 Page 430 of 746 Page 431 of 746 Page 432 of 746 Page 433 of 746 Page 434 of 746 Traffic and Parking Study for 4201 W. 50th Street Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed child daycare and church located at 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN. The proposed project would be located in the existing vacant church building. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street • W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue • W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue • W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue • W. 50th Street/parking lot access • Indianola Avenue/parking lot access The proposed project involves remodeling the existing building into a child daycare center and a church. The daycare center will have space for 146 children and 25 staff. The church will have space for 276 occupants. The daycare will operate Monday through Friday. The church is assumed to have one service on Sunday at 10:00 a.m.. The site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the parking lot behind the building. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access on W. 50th Street and one on Indianola Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2027. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to generate 133 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 143 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 845 trips daily On Sunday, the proposed project is expected to generate 101 trips during the 9:00- 10:00 a.m. hour and 101 trips during the 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. hour. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided are 34 spaces greater than the demand. • For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With a maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The 71 total spaces provided are 21 spaces less than the demand. Page 435 of 746 • Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare center and 83 parking stalls for the church. The 71 total spaces provided is 38 spaces greater than the City code requirement for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided is 12 spaces less than the City code requirement for the church. • In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 436 of 746 To: Cary Teague, City of Edina From: Ed Terhaar, PE Chad Millner, PE, City of Edina File: 193807565 Date: January 13, 2026 Reference: Traffic and Parking Study Additional Information for 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN The following additional Traffic and Parking Study information is provided in response to items presented in an email dated December 28, 2025 from B. Steven Springrose. Traffic Volumes on W. 50th Street Traffic volume data on W. 50th Street west of Wooddale Avenue cited in the email was collected in 2021. Since that time, new traffic data has been collected showing traffic volumes have decreased approximately 6 percent. The traffic volume on W. 50th Street west of Wooddale is the highest volume location included in this study. Information from MnDOT indicates the current annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume is 29,281 west of Wooddale Avenue, 17,153 immediately east of Wooddale Avenue, and 10,067 east of Halifax Avenue. Therefore, traffic volumes decrease on W. 50th Street as you move east toward France Avenue due to the residential uses to the north and south. As stated in the report, traffic volume data was recorded at each intersection in October, 2025 on a weekday and on a Sunday. During this time period, the W. 50th Street bridge over TH 100 was closed for construction. The collected volumes were adjusted to account for the closure using detailed traffic counts data from past studies in the area and daily traffic volume data from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. As shown in the report, the p.m. peak hour volumes on the west end are 1,104 eastbound and 969 westbound. On the east end, the p.m. peak hour volumes are 495 eastbound and 368 westbound. Level of Service Results Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The LOS results account for the amount of traffic on the major street and minor street approaches. LOS results are presented for the entire intersection and for the worst movement. In the case of minor street stop controlled intersections, the worst movement is typically left turns from the minor street onto the major street. At this location, the highest volumes on W. 50th Street occur during the weekday p.m. peak hour. All overall intersections operate at LOS A or B during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. At Arden Avenue, the minor street approaches operate at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour and LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. At Jay Place, the minor street approach operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour under existing conditions and LOS D under future conditions. During the p.m. peak hour, the minor street approach operates at LOS D under existing conditions and LOS E under future conditions. At Indianola Avenue, the minor street approach operates at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour under existing conditions and future conditions. During the p.m. peak hour, the minor street approach operates at LOS D under existing conditions and LOS E under future conditions. As noted above, the volumes on W. 50th Street decrease between Wooddale Avenue and Halifax Avenue. With higher volumes at Arden Avenue, the minor street operates at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. With slightly lower volumes at Jay Place and Indianola Avenue, the minor street approaches operate and LOS D and E during the p.m. peak hour. Page 437 of 746 Cary Teague Chad Millner January 13, 2026 Jay Place Width Construction plans indicate the width of Jay Street is 19 feet curb face to curb face. This width is less than the preferred minimum width of 20 feet for public streets. The provided width may be challenging at times with additional traffic, but serious operational issues are not expected. The site has an additional access to Indianola Avenue which can be used if the Jay Street access is temporarily blocked. It is expected that trips to and from the site will be split between Jay Place and Indianola Avenue. As shown in the report, this results in 36 entering and 31 exiting trips during the a.m. peak hour and 33 entering and 38 exiting during the p.m. peak hour at Jay Place. Trip Generation Weekday trip generation totals for the proposed daycare center and for the church were calculated using data presented in the eleventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The ITE data is the industry standard for traffic studies and is based on actual data collected at multiple sites throughout the country. The trip generation totals include all trips to and from the site, including parent drop-off/pick-up, staff, visitors, and deliveries. Information from the day care operator indicated the facility is open from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.. The main drop off times are 7:30 to 9:00 a.m. and the main pickup times are 4:00 to 5:30 p.m. Drop-offs and pick-ups are distributed throughout the main times and do not all occur at once. Trip Distribution The proposed daycare center and church are expected draw users from all directions, resulting in equal distribution to and from the east and west. This differs from nearby residential uses, which are likely drawn more heavily to and from the west due to the proximity of TH 100. Traffic in the Neighborhood to the South Due to the close proximity and direct access, the vast majority of trips are expected to use W. 50th Street for entering and exiting the site. A small portion of trips may use Indianola Avenue to travel to and from the south to access W. 52nd Street. If 5 percent of the trips use this route, this results in 6 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 6 trips during the p.m. peak hour. This level of additional traffic during the peak hours would not result in any traffic operation problems. Parking All parking stalls shown in the site plan are available for use by the daycare and church. Access for the garage that is adjacent to the parking lot must be maintained as currently striped. The daycare and church operator must continue to work with the adjacent neighbors to maintain access to these parking stalls. Summary The traffic volumes used in the study were developed using the volumes collected for the study and the latest MnDOT volumes and detailed turn movement counts collected in 2025 for other studies in the area. Traffic volumes on W. 50th Street decrease from west to east through the study area. Using a constant volume through the study area would not be realistic. The trip generation was determined using ITE data, which is the standard for traffic studies. The proposed daycare center and church are expected draw users from all directions, resulting in equal distribution to and from the east and west. All vehicles entering and exiting the site must yield to all pedestrian and non-street traffic. Page 438 of 746 File #193807565 January 9, 2026 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. One Carlson Parkway Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN Page 439 of 746 January 2026 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-5 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY A.M. AND P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 SUNDAY 900-1000 A.M. AND 1100 A.M.-1200 P.M. VOLUMES ........ 4-4 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: January 9, 2026 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 Page 440 of 746 January 2026 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed child daycare and church located at 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN. The proposed project would be located in the existing vacant church building. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street • W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue • W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue • W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue • W. 50th Street/parking lot access • Indianola Avenue/parking lot access The proposed project involves remodeling the existing building into a child daycare center and a church. The daycare center will have space for 146 children and 25 staff. The church will have space for 276 occupants. The daycare will operate Monday through Friday. The church is assumed to have one service on Sunday at 10:00 a.m.. The site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the parking lot behind the building. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access on W. 50th Street and one on Indianola Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2027. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to generate 133 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 143 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 845 trips daily On Sunday, the proposed project is expected to generate 101 trips during the 9:00- 10:00 a.m. hour and 101 trips during the 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. hour. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided are 34 spaces greater than the demand. • For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With a maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The 71 total spaces provided are 21 spaces less than the demand. Page 441 of 746 January 2026 1-2 • Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare center and 83 parking stalls for the church. The 71 total spaces provided is 38 spaces greater than the City code requirement for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided is 12 spaces less than the City code requirement for the church. • In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 442 of 746 January 2026 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed child daycare and church located at 4201 W. 50th Street in Edina, MN. The proposed project would be located in the existing vacant church building. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street • W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue • W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue • W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue • W. 50th Street/parking lot access • Indianola Avenue/parking lot access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project involves remodeling the existing building into a child daycare center and a church. The daycare center will have space for 146 children and 25 staff. The church will have space for 276 occupants. The daycare will operate Monday through Friday. The church is assumed to have one service on Sunday at 10:00 a.m.. The site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the parking lot behind the building. As shown in the site plan, the project includes one access on W. 50th Street and one on Indianola Avenue. The project is expected to be completed in 2027. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. Page 443 of 746 January 2026 2-2 Page 444 of 746 January 2026 2-3 Page 445 of 746 January 2026 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed project location currently contains a vacant church building and parking area. The site is bounded by W. 50th Street on the north, Indianola Avenue on the east, and residential uses on the west and south. Near the site location, W. 50th Street, Wooddale Avenue, and Halifax Avenue are two lane roadways with turn lanes and signal control at major intersections. Arden Avenue and Indianola Avenue are two lane undivided roadways. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. W. 50th Street/Wooddale Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide a left turn lane, a through lane, and a through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides a left turn/through/right turn lane. The southbound approaches provide a left turn/through and a right turn lane. W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the northbound and southbound approaches. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. W. 50th Street/Indianola Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound approach. All approaches provide a single lane shared by turning and through movements. W. 50th Street/Halifax Avenue/Market Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides a left turn lane, a through lane, and a right turn lane. The westbound approach provides a left turn lane and a through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides a left turn lane and a through/right turn lane. The southbound approaches provide a left turn/through and a right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Weekday traffic volume data was recorded at each intersection in October, 2025 on a weekday and on a Sunday. During this time period, the W. 50th Street bridge over TH 100 was closed for construction. The collected volumes were adjusted to account for the closure using traffic counts data from past studies in the area and daily traffic volume data from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The resultant volumes are presented later in this report. Page 446 of 746 January 2026 3-2 Page 447 of 746 January 2026 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2027. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Sunday peak our traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2025 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2027 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2027 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site. • 2027 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2027 No-Build volumes to determine 2027 Build volumes. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday trip generation totals for the proposed daycare center and for the church were calculated using data presented in the eleventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Sunday trip generation for the church was determined assuming a peak attendance 276 people. Based on information from similar facilities, a vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle was used to determine the trip generation. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. Table 4-1 Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Daycare Center 146 students 60 54 114 54 61 115 597 Church 276 occupants 12 7 19 12 16 28 248 Totals 72 61 133 66 77 143 845 Table 4-1 Sunday Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Sunday 900-1000 AM Hour Sunday 1100 AM- 1200 PM Hour In Out Total In Out Total Daycare Center 140 students 0 0 0 0 0 0 Church 276 occupants 92 9 101 9 92 101 Totals 92 9 101 9 92 101 Page 448 of 746 January 2026 4-2 Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 40 percent to/from the east on W. 50th Street • 40 percent to/from the west on W. 50th Street • 10 percent to/from the south on Wooddale Avenue • 10 percent to/from the south on Halifax Avenue Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. and Sunday peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Page 449 of 746 January 2026 4-3 Page 450 of 746 January 2026 4-4 Page 451 of 746 January 2026 5-5 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. In accordance with MnDOT traffic study guidelines, this analysis used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. Page 452 of 746 January 2026 5-6 The LOS results for the study intersections are discussed below. 2025 Existing Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal B/B B/B W. 50th St/Arden Ave NB/SB stop A/E A/F W. 50th St/access NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal B/C B/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements operate at LOS E or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements except the northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS D or better. The northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS F. Sunday 900-1000 AM and 1100 AM-1200 P.M. LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control 900-1000 AM LOS 1100 AM-1200 PM LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal A/A A/A A/A NB/SB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/access NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal A/B A/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the 900-1000 a.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS B or better. During the 1100 a.m.-1200 p.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A or better and movements operate at LOS B or better. 2027 No Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal B/B B/C W. 50th St/Arden Ave NB/SB stop A/E A/F W. 50th St/access NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/C A/D W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal B/C B/C Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements operate at LOS E or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements except the northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS D or better. The northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS F. Page 453 of 746 January 2026 5-7 Sunday 900-1000 AM and 1100 AM-1200 P.M. LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control 900-1000 AM LOS 1100 AM-1200 PM LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal A/A A/A A/A NB/SB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/access NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal A/B A/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the 900-1000 a.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS B or better. During the 1100 a.m.-1200 p.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A or better and movements operate at LOS B or better. 2027 Build Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control AM Peak Hour LOS PM Peak Hour LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal B/B B/C W. 50th St/Arden Ave NB/SB stop A/E A/F W. 50th St/access NB stop A/D A/E W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/C A/E W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal B/C B/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the a.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements operate at LOS E or better. During the p.m. peak hour, all intersections operate at LOS B or better. All movements except the northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS D or better. The northbound and southbound movements at W. 50th Street/Arden Avenue operate at LOS F. Sunday 900-1000 AM and 1100 AM-1200 P.M. LOS Results Intersection Traffic Control 900-1000 AM LOS 1100 AM-1200 PM LOS W. 50th St/Wooddale Ave Signal A/A A/A A/A NB/SB stop A/C A/C W. 50th St/access NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Indianola Ave NB stop A/B A/B W. 50th St/Halifax Ave/Market St Signal A/B A/B Indianola Ave/access EB stop A/A A/A Note: Level of service results presented with overall intersection LOS followed by worst movement LOS. During the 900-1000 a.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A and all movements operate at LOS C or better. During the 1100 a.m.-1200 p.m. hour, all intersections operate at LOS A or better and movements operate at LOS C or better. Overall Traffic Impact Under 2025, 2027 No Build, and 2027 Build conditions, left turns onto W. 50th Street at Arden Avenue operate at poor levels of service with minor street stop control due to the large amount of through traffic on W. 50th Street. While not ideal, this condition often occurs at minor street stop controlled intersections with large volumes on the major street. Page 454 of 746 January 2026 5-8 As an additional check, the queue lengths on Ardern Avenue were reviewed to determine if they are excessive. Due to the low volume of traffic on Arden Avenue, the queue lengths are not expected to be excessive under any of the scenarios. The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Traffic Volume on Maple Road Maple Road extends north from W. 50th Street and connects with 48th and 49th Streets, both which connect with France Avenue to the east. Some traffic to and from the north on France Avenue could divert onto 48th Street or 49th Street to use Maple Road to access the site. Based on travel time information and the access locations to the site, it is expected that only a small amount of traffic may use this route. We estimate that 6-8 vehicles may use this route during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This level of additional traffic during the peak hours would not result in any traffic operation problems. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on both sides of W. 50th Street and the west side of Indianola Avenue near the proposed project. Sidewalk is also provided on both sides of Halifax Avenue, Market Street, Arden Avenue north of W. 50th Street, and Wooddale Avenue north of W. 50th Street. Sidewalk is provided on the east side of Wooddale Avenue south of W. 50th Street. No sidewalk is provided on Arden Avenue south of W. 50th Street. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by Metro Transit bus route 46 on W. 50th Street. Bus stops exist on both sides of W. 50th Street at the project location. Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. • Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 455 of 746 January 2026 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the site plan shows 71 total parking spaces in the existing parking lot behind the building. Parking demand was calculated separately for the daycare center, which operates only on weekdays, and for the church assuming a maximum capacity service on a Sunday. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare and 83 parking stalls for the church. Based on this information, the existing 71 stalls are adequate for the daycare center on weekdays but less than the expected peak parking demand for the church. In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during maximum occupancy events. Page 456 of 746 January 2026 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to generate 133 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 143 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 845 trips daily On Sunday, the proposed project is expected to generate 101 trips during the 9:00- 10:00 a.m. hour and 101 trips during the 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. hour. • The trips added to the roadway system by the proposed project are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the daycare center. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 6th Edition, results in a peak weekday parking demand of 37 spaces for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided are 34 spaces greater than the demand. • For the church, the peak Sunday parking demand was determined assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per vehicle. This vehicle occupancy was determined from industry information for church facilities from the Urban Land Institute and experiences on other church parking studies. With a maximum occupancy event of 276 persons, the peak parking demand is 92 spaces. The 71 total spaces provided are 21 spaces less than the demand. • Edina City code requires 33 spaces for the daycare center and 83 parking stalls for the church. The 71 total spaces provided is 38 spaces greater than the City code requirement for the daycare center. The 71 total spaces provided is 12 spaces less than the City code requirement for the church. • In order to accommodate potential excess parking demand, the project owner should develop a parking plan that clearly identifies options for parking demand greater than the spaces provided on-site. This could include items such as providing off-site parking locations and/or valet parking during a maximum occupancy event. • Future plans for this area include a shared use path on Arden Avenue, which is part of a larger loop system envisioned for the City. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. Page 457 of 746 January 2026 7-2 • Per City requirements, a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes and schedules. o Providing maps of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees and facility users. The goal of the TDM plan is a 10 percent reduction in single occupant vehicle trips. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. Page 458 of 746 January 2026 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets Page 459 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 AM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 78 506 136 43 888 39 156 79 72 53 129 128Future Volume (veh/h) 78 506 136 43 888 39 156 79 72 53 129 128Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 84 544 146 46 955 42 168 85 77 57 139 138Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 311 1272 340 414 1590 70 299 143 96 218 461 524Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.330.33 0.33 0.33Sat Flow, veh/h 565 2773 741 753 3467 152 520 433 290 330 13951585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 84 348 342 46 489 508 330 0 0 196 0 138Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 565 1777 1737 753 1777 1843 1243 00 1725 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 5.6 5.7 1.9 8.8 8.8 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.4 5.6 5.7 7.5 8.8 8.8 10.7 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 2.7Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.08 0.51 0.23 0.29 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 815 797 414 815 845 538 0 0 679 0 524V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.43 0.43 0.11 0.60 0.60 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 376 1019 996 501 1019 1057 770 0 0 959 0798HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.0 7.8 7.8 10.3 8.6 8.6 13.3 0.00.0 10.7 0.0 10.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 1.6 1.6 0.3 2.6 2.6 2.5 0.0 0.01.1 0.0 0.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 14.5 8.1 8.2 10.5 9.4 9.3 14.5 0.0 0.010.9 0.0 10.7LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 774 1043 330 334Approach Delay, s/veh 8.8 9.4 14.5 10.9Approach LOS A A B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 24.1 18.6 24.1Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 24.5 21.5 24.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 16.4 5.3 10.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 3.2 1.4 5.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.1HCM 7th LOS BPage 460 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.9Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 9 571 7 1 748 21 10 7 4 21 4 25Future Vol, veh/h 9 571 7 1 748 21 10 7 4 21 4 25Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 10 607 7 1 796 22 11 7 4 22 4 27Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 818 0 0 615 0 0 1430 1451 611 1439 1443 807 Stage 1 - - - - - - 630 630 - 809 809 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 800 820 - 630 634 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 810 - - 965 - - 112 131 494 111 132 381 Stage 1 - - - - - - 469 475 - 374 394 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 379 389 - 469 473 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 810 - - 965 - - 99 128 494 101 129 381Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 99 128 - 101 129 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 461 466 - 373 393 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 348 388 - 450 464 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.15 0.01 38.89 36.95HCM LOS E EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 128 28 - - 2 - - 165HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 0.012 - - 0.001 - - 0.323HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 38.9 9.5 0 - 8.7 0 - 37HCM Lane LOS E A A - A A - EHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 1.3Page 461 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 589 1 1 701 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 589 1 1 701 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 627 1 1 746 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 628 0 1375 627 Stage 1 - - - - 627 - Stage 2 - - - - 748 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 954 - 160 483 Stage 1 - - - - 532 - Stage 2 - - - - 468 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 954 - 160 483Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 160 - Stage 1 - - - - 532 - Stage 2 - - - - 467 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 24.17HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 192 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 24.2 - - 8.8 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 462 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 556 10 2 626 7 5Future Vol, veh/h 556 10 2 626 7 5Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 585 11 2 659 7 5Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 596 0 1254 591 Stage 1 - - - - 591 - Stage 2 - - - - 663 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 981 - 190 507 Stage 1 - - - - 554 - Stage 2 - - - - 512 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 981 - 189 507Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 189 - Stage 1 - - - - 554 - Stage 2 - - - - 511 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 19.79HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 256 - - 6 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 19.8 - - 8.7 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 463 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 AM 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 92 298 171 28 374 21 173 53 12 10 39 81Future Volume (veh/h) 92 298 171 28 374 21 173 53 12 10 39 81Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 97 314 180 29 394 22 182 56 13 11 41 85Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 391 889 753 429 517 29 467 471 109 122 161 165Arrive On Green 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.32 0.320.10 0.10 0.10Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 903 1755 98 1781 1468 341 227 1551 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 97 314 180 29 0 416 182 0 69 52 0 85Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 903 0 1853 1781 0 1809 1778 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 4.7 3.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 3.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.2Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 4.7 3.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 3.7 0.0 1.2 1.10.0 2.2Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.19 0.21 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 391 889 753 429 0 546 467 0 581 284 0 165V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.35 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.76 0.39 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.52Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 472 1333 1130 602 0 901 484 0 1207 865 0699HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.4 7.3 6.9 11.4 0.0 14.2 13.4 0.010.6 18.2 0.0 18.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.5Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 3.4 1.3 0.0 0.40.5 0.0 0.8Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.8 7.6 7.0 11.4 0.0 16.4 14.0 0.0 10.7 18.6 0.0 21.2LnGrp LOS A A A B B B B B CApproach Vol, veh/h 591 445 251 137Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 16.1 13.1 20.2Approach LOS A B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.7 25.5 9.6 9.1 8.0 17.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 31.5 5.5 19.5 5.5 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 6.7 5.7 4.2 3.5 11.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.5HCM 7th LOS BPage 464 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 AM13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 13 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 26 13 13 0 - 0 Stage 1 13 - - - - - Stage 2 13 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 990 - - - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1606 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 465 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 80 516 139 44 906 40 159 81 73 54 132 131Future Volume (veh/h) 80 516 139 44 906 40 159 81 73 54 132 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 555 149 47 974 43 171 87 78 58 142 141Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 302 1279 342 405 1599 71 296 143 96 216 462 531Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.340.34 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 554 2772 742 743 3467 153 518 427 286 331 13791585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 355 349 47 499 518 336 0 0 200 0 141Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 554 1777 1737 743 1777 1843 1231 00 1710 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 6.1 5.9 6.0 2.0 9.3 9.3 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.4 5.9 6.0 8.0 9.3 9.3 11.4 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 2.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.08 0.51 0.23 0.29 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 302 820 801 405 820 850 535 0 0 678 0 531V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.43 0.44 0.12 0.61 0.61 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.27Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 353 985 963 474 985 1021 737 0 0 923 0 771HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.7 8.0 8.0 10.7 8.9 8.9 13.8 0.00.0 10.9 0.0 10.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 1.7 1.7 0.3 2.8 2.9 2.7 0.0 0.01.2 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.2 8.4 8.4 10.8 9.7 9.7 15.0 0.0 0.011.2 0.0 11.0LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 790 1064 336 341Approach Delay, s/veh 9.1 9.7 15.0 11.1Approach LOS A A B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.3 24.9 19.3 24.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 24.5 21.5 24.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.4 17.4 5.5 11.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 3.0 1.5 5.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.4HCM 7th LOS BPage 466 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 9 582 7 1 763 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Future Vol, veh/h 9 582 7 1 763 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 10 619 7 1 812 22 11 7 4 22 4 28Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 834 0 0 627 0 0 1458 1478 623 1467 1471 823 Stage 1 - - - - - - 642 642 - 825 825 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 816 836 - 642 646 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 799 - - 955 - - 107 126 486 106 127 374 Stage 1 - - - - - - 463 469 - 367 387 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 371 382 - 463 467 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 799 - - 955 - - 94 123 486 97 125 374Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 94 123 - 97 125 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 454 460 - 366 386 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 339 382 - 443 459 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.14 0.01 40.79 38.66HCM LOS E EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 123 27 - - 2 - - 160HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.182 0.012 - - 0.001 - - 0.339HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 40.8 9.6 0 - 8.8 0 - 38.7HCM Lane LOS E A A - A A - EHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 1.4Page 467 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 601 1 1 715 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 601 1 1 715 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 639 1 1 761 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 640 0 1403 640 Stage 1 - - - - 640 - Stage 2 - - - - 763 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 944 - 154 475 Stage 1 - - - - 525 - Stage 2 - - - - 460 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 944 - 154 475Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 154 - Stage 1 - - - - 525 - Stage 2 - - - - 459 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 24.9HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 185 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 24.9 - - 8.8 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 468 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 567 10 2 639 7 5Future Vol, veh/h 567 10 2 639 7 5Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 597 11 2 673 7 5Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 607 0 1279 602 Stage 1 - - - - 602 - Stage 2 - - - - 677 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 971 - 183 500 Stage 1 - - - - 547 - Stage 2 - - - - 505 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 971 - 183 500Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 183 - Stage 1 - - - - 547 - Stage 2 - - - - 503 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 20.28HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 248 - - 6 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 20.3 - - 8.7 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 469 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM No-Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 94 304 174 29 382 21 176 54 12 10 40 83Future Volume (veh/h) 94 304 174 29 382 21 176 54 12 10 40 83Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 320 183 31 402 22 185 57 13 11 42 87Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 388 894 757 428 524 29 467 473 108 120 161 164Arrive On Green 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.32 0.320.10 0.10 0.10Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 896 1757 96 1781 1474 336 223 1557 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 320 183 31 0 424 185 0 70 53 0 87Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 896 0 1853 1781 0 1810 1780 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 4.8 3.0 1.1 0.0 9.3 3.8 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 4.8 3.0 1.1 0.0 9.3 3.8 0.0 1.2 1.20.0 2.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.19 0.21 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 388 894 757 428 0 553 467 0 581 281 0 164V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.36 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.77 0.40 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.53Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 467 1317 1116 591 0 891 478 0 1193 855 0691HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.5 7.4 6.9 11.4 0.0 14.3 13.6 0.010.7 18.5 0.0 19.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.6Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.4 0.8 0.2 0.0 3.6 1.4 0.0 0.40.5 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.9 7.6 7.1 11.5 0.0 16.6 14.2 0.0 10.8 18.8 0.0 21.7LnGrp LOS A A A B B B B B CApproach Vol, veh/h 602 455 255 140Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 16.2 13.2 20.6Approach LOS A B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.9 25.9 9.7 9.1 8.0 17.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 31.5 5.5 19.5 5.5 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 6.8 5.8 4.3 3.5 11.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.6HCM 7th LOS BPage 470 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM No-Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 12 12 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 13 13 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 26 13 13 0 - 0 Stage 1 13 - - - - - Stage 2 13 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 990 1068 1606 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 990 - - - - - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1606 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 471 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 80 545 139 49 931 40 159 81 80 54 132 131Future Volume (veh/h) 80 545 139 49 931 40 159 81 80 54 132 131Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 586 149 53 1001 43 171 87 86 58 142 141Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 292 1304 331 391 1613 69 290 141 104 214 460 535Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.340.34 0.34 0.34Sat Flow, veh/h 540 2807 712 722 3471 149 510 417 309 331 13631585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 370 365 53 512 532 344 0 0 200 0 141Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 540 1777 1742 722 1777 1844 1235 00 1693 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 6.5 6.4 6.5 2.4 9.9 9.9 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.4 6.4 6.5 8.9 9.9 9.9 12.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 2.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.08 0.50 0.25 0.29 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 292 826 809 391 826 857 536 0 0 674 0 535V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.45 0.45 0.14 0.62 0.62 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.26Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 331 956 937 444 956 991 715 0 0 891 0 748HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.3 8.2 8.3 11.3 9.2 9.2 14.2 0.00.0 11.2 0.0 11.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 1.9 1.9 0.3 3.0 3.1 2.9 0.0 0.01.3 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.9 8.6 8.7 11.4 10.1 10.1 15.5 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 11.2LnGrp LOS B A A B B B B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 821 1097 344 341Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 10.2 15.5 11.3Approach LOS A B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.9 25.7 19.9 25.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 24.5 21.5 24.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 18.4 5.6 11.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 2.8 1.5 5.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.8HCM 7th LOS BPage 472 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 9 618 7 1 793 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Future Vol, veh/h 9 618 7 1 793 21 10 7 4 21 4 26Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 10 657 7 1 844 22 11 7 4 22 4 28Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 866 0 0 665 0 0 1528 1548 661 1537 1541 855 Stage 1 - - - - - - 680 680 - 857 857 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 848 868 - 680 684 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - - 924 - - 96 114 462 95 115 358 Stage 1 - - - - - - 441 451 - 352 374 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 356 370 - 441 449 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 777 - - 924 - - 83 112 462 86 113 358Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 83 112 - 86 113 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 432 442 - 351 373 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 324 369 - 421 440 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.14 0.01 45.99 44.22HCM LOS E EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 110 25 - - 2 - - 144HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.204 0.012 - - 0.001 - - 0.376HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 46 9.7 0 - 8.9 0 - 44.2HCM Lane LOS E A A - A A - EHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - 0 - - 1.6Page 473 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.6Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 601 37 1 729 19 15Future Vol, veh/h 601 37 1 729 19 15Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 639 39 1 776 20 16Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 679 0 1437 659 Stage 1 - - - - 659 - Stage 2 - - - - 778 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 913 - 147 464 Stage 1 - - - - 515 - Stage 2 - - - - 453 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 913 - 147 464Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 147 - Stage 1 - - - - 515 - Stage 2 - - - - 452 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 25.68HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 210 - - 2 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.172 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 25.7 - - 8.9 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - 0 -Page 474 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 582 10 38 639 21 21Future Vol, veh/h 582 10 38 639 21 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 613 11 40 673 22 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 623 0 1371 618 Stage 1 - - - - 618 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 958 - 161 489 Stage 1 - - - - 538 - Stage 2 - - - - 465 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 958 - 150 489Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 150 - Stage 1 - - - - 538 - Stage 2 - - - - 434 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.5 24.32HCM LOS CMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 230 - - 101 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.192 - - 0.042 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 24.3 - - 8.9 0HCM Lane LOS C - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 0.1 -Page 475 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 AM Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 94 329 180 29 411 21 183 54 12 10 40 83Future Volume (veh/h) 94 329 180 29 411 21 183 54 12 10 40 83Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 99 346 189 31 433 22 193 57 13 11 42 87Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 377 911 772 427 550 28 463 468 107 117 157 160Arrive On Green 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.32 0.320.10 0.10 0.10Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 870 1765 90 1781 1474 336 223 1556 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 99 346 189 31 0 455 193 0 70 53 0 87Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 870 0 1854 1781 0 1810 1780 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 5.4 3.2 1.2 0.0 10.3 4.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 5.4 3.2 1.2 0.0 10.3 4.1 0.0 1.3 1.2 0.0 2.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.19 0.21 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 377 911 772 427 0 578 463 0 575 274 0 160V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.38 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.79 0.42 0.00 0.12 0.19 0.00 0.54Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 435 1260 1068 561 0 864 463 0 1173 844 0684HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.7 7.4 6.9 11.3 0.0 14.5 14.2 0.011.2 19.2 0.0 19.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.9 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.9Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.6 0.8 0.2 0.0 4.0 1.5 0.0 0.40.5 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.1 7.7 7.1 11.4 0.0 17.4 14.8 0.0 11.3 19.5 0.0 22.6LnGrp LOS B A A B B B B B CApproach Vol, veh/h 634 486 263 140Approach Delay, s/veh 7.9 17.0 13.8 21.4Approach LOS A B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.2 27.0 10.0 9.2 8.1 18.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.9 31.1 5.5 19.9 5.1 21.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 7.4 6.1 4.4 3.5 12.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.1HCM 7th LOS BPage 476 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 AM Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 30 0 0 12 12 36Future Vol, veh/h 30 0 0 12 12 36Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 32 0 0 13 13 38Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 45 32 51 0 - 0 Stage 1 32 - - - - - Stage 2 13 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 966 1042 1555 - - - Stage 1 991 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 966 1042 1555 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 966 - - - - - Stage 1 991 - - - - - Stage 2 1010 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.86 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1555 - 966 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.033 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.9 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -Page 477 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 PM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 96 854 154 65 681 58 168 148 50 80 160 120Future Volume (veh/h) 96 854 154 65 681 58 168 148 50 80 160 120Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 101 899 162 68 717 61 177 156 53 84 168 126Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 339 1361 245 246 1500 128 272 220 63 239 437 610Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.39 0.390.39 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 694 3008 542 532 3315 282 459 570 164 395 11351585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 101 531 530 68 384 394 386 0 0 252 0 126Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 694 1777 1773 532 1777 1820 1194 00 1530 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 12.9 12.9 6.3 8.4 8.4 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.02.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.0 12.9 12.9 19.3 8.4 8.4 17.2 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 2.9Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.15 0.46 0.14 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 804 802 246 804 823 554 0 0 676 0 610V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.66 0.66 0.28 0.48 0.48 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 407 978 976 299 978 1002 807 0 0 962 0 901HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.8 11.8 11.8 19.4 10.6 10.6 16.5 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 11.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 4.5 4.5 0.8 2.8 2.9 4.2 0.0 0.02.0 0.0 0.9Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.3 13.1 13.1 20.0 11.0 11.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 11.5LnGrp LOS B B B B B B B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 1162 846 386 378Approach Delay, s/veh 13.4 11.8 18.1 12.2Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.8 29.6 25.8 29.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.5 31.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.2 17.0 7.8 21.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.1 6.6 2.0 3.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.4HCM 7th LOS BPage 478 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.5Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 929 10 6 698 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Future Vol, veh/h 6 929 10 6 698 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 6 988 11 6 743 34 6 1 5 22 7 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 777 0 0 999 0 0 1765 1796 994 1774 1784 760 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1006 1006 - 772 772 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 759 789 - 1002 1012 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 840 - - 693 - - 65 80 298 65 82 406 Stage 1 - - - - - - 291 319 - 392 409 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 399 402 - 292 317 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 840 - - 693 - - 54 78 298 60 79 406Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 54 78 - 60 79 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 286 313 - 386 402 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 364 395 - 281 311 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.06 0.08 54.29 74.32HCM LOS F FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 86 11 - - 15 - - 100HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 0.008 - - 0.009 - - 0.519HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 54.3 9.3 0 - 10.2 0 - 74.3HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - FHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 2.3Page 479 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 849 1 1 689 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 849 1 1 689 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 913 1 1 741 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 914 0 1656 913 Stage 1 - - - - 913 - Stage 2 - - - - 743 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 746 - 108 331 Stage 1 - - - - 391 - Stage 2 - - - - 470 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 746 - 107 331Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 107 - Stage 1 - - - - 391 - Stage 2 - - - - 469 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 27.49HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 162 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 27.5 - - 9.8 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 480 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 743 10 1 660 6 3Future Vol, veh/h 743 10 1 660 6 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 790 11 1 702 6 3Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 801 0 1500 796 Stage 1 - - - - 796 - Stage 2 - - - - 704 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 822 - 134 387 Stage 1 - - - - 444 - Stage 2 - - - - 490 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 822 - 134 387Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 134 - Stage 1 - - - - 444 - Stage 2 - - - - 489 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 27.23HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 171 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 27.2 - - 9.4 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 481 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 PM 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 28 442 220 39 291 38 216 106 28 25 102 137Future Volume (veh/h) 28 442 220 39 291 38 216 106 28 25 102 137Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 29 465 232 41 306 40 227 112 29 26 107 144Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 324 754 639 316 435 57 511 565 146 128 239 242Arrive On Green 0.03 0.40 0.40 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.39 0.390.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 748 1620 212 1781 1433 371 2061562 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 29 465 232 41 0 346 227 0 141 133 0 144Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 748 0 1832 1781 0 1804 1768 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 8.8 4.6 2.1 0.0 7.6 4.3 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.0 3.8Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 8.8 4.6 4.8 0.0 7.6 4.3 0.0 2.3 2.90.0 3.8Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 0.20 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 324 754 639 316 0 492 511 0 712 367 0 242V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.62 0.36 0.13 0.00 0.70 0.44 0.00 0.20 0.36 0.00 0.59Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 483 1700 1441 627 0 1254 800 0 1640 9670 801HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.7 10.6 9.3 14.9 0.0 14.7 11.5 0.0 8.9 17.2 0.0 17.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 2.3Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 2.9 1.3 0.3 0.0 2.9 1.4 0.0 0.71.1 0.0 1.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.8 11.4 9.6 15.0 0.0 16.5 12.1 0.0 9.0 17.8 0.0 19.9LnGrp LOS B B A B B B A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 726 387 368 277Approach Delay, s/veh 10.8 16.4 10.9 18.9Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.1 22.5 10.8 11.3 6.0 16.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.5 40.5 13.5 22.5 5.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 10.8 6.3 5.8 2.5 9.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 4.1 0.4 1.1 0.0 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.3HCM 7th LOS BPage 482 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 PM13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 11 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 20 11 11 0 - 0 Stage 1 11 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 997 - - - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1609 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 483 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 98 871 157 66 695 59 171 151 51 82 163 122Future Volume (veh/h) 98 871 157 66 695 59 171 151 51 82 163 122Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 917 165 69 732 62 180 159 54 86 172 128Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 327 1362 245 234 1501 127 269 218 63 238 437 623Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.39 0.390.39 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 684 3009 541 521 3316 281 455 556 161 395 11141585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 541 541 69 392 402 393 0 0 258 0 128Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 684 1777 1773 521 1777 1820 1172 00 1509 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 7.3 14.0 14.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.3 14.0 14.0 21.0 9.0 9.0 18.9 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 3.1Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.15 0.46 0.14 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 327 804 802 234 804 824 551 0 0 675 0 623V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.67 0.67 0.29 0.49 0.49 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 376 931 929 272 931 954 755 0 0 906 0 858HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.9 12.5 12.5 20.8 11.2 11.2 17.4 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 11.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 1.6 1.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.1 5.0 5.0 0.8 3.1 3.2 4.6 0.0 0.02.1 0.0 1.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.5 14.1 14.1 21.5 11.6 11.6 19.4 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 11.8LnGrp LOS B B B C B B B B BApproach Vol, veh/h 1185 863 393 386Approach Delay, s/veh 14.4 12.4 19.4 12.5Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.4 30.8 27.4 30.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.5 30.5 31.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.9 18.3 8.4 23.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 6.3 2.0 3.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.2HCM 7th LOS BPage 484 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 2.7Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 948 10 6 712 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Future Vol, veh/h 6 948 10 6 712 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 6 1009 11 6 757 34 6 1 5 22 7 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 791 0 0 1019 0 0 1801 1831 1014 1809 1819774 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1027 1027 - 787 787 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 774 804 - 1022 1032 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 829 - - 681 - - 62 76 290 61 78 398 Stage 1 - - - - - - 283 312 - 385 403 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 391 396 - 285 310 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 829 - - 681 - - 51 74 290 57 75 398Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 51 74 - 57 75 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 278 306 - 378 396 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 356 389 - 274 305 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.06 0.08 57.82 81.32HCM LOS F FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 81 11 - - 14 - - 95HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 0.008 - - 0.009 - - 0.548HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 57.8 9.4 0 - 10.3 0 - 81.3HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - FHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - - 2.5Page 485 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 866 1 1 703 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 866 1 1 703 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 931 1 1 756 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 932 0 1690 932 Stage 1 - - - - 932 - Stage 2 - - - - 758 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 734 - 103 323 Stage 1 - - - - 383 - Stage 2 - - - - 463 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 734 - 102 323Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 102 - Stage 1 - - - - 383 - Stage 2 - - - - 462 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 28.46HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 156 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 28.5 - - 9.9 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 486 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 758 10 1 673 6 3Future Vol, veh/h 758 10 1 673 6 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 806 11 1 716 6 3Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 817 0 1530 812 Stage 1 - - - - 812 - Stage 2 - - - - 718 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 811 - 129 379 Stage 1 - - - - 437 - Stage 2 - - - - 483 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 811 - 129 379Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 129 - Stage 1 - - - - 437 - Stage 2 - - - - 482 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 28.17HCM LOS DMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 165 - - 3 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 28.2 - - 9.4 0HCM Lane LOS D - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0 -Page 487 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM No-Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 29 451 224 40 297 39 220 108 29 26 104 140Future Volume (veh/h) 29 451 224 40 297 39 220 108 29 26 104 140Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 475 236 42 313 41 232 114 31 27 109 147Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 322 760 644 309 440 58 511 561 152 127 239 243Arrive On Green 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.40 0.400.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 739 1620 212 1781 1416 385 2101555 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 475 236 42 0 354 232 0 145 136 0 147Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 739 0 1832 1781 0 1801 1765 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 9.2 4.7 2.2 0.0 7.9 4.5 0.0 2.4 0.4 0.0 3.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 9.2 4.7 5.3 0.0 7.9 4.5 0.0 2.4 3.10.0 3.9Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 0.20 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 322 760 644 309 0 498 511 0 713 366 0 243V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.62 0.37 0.14 0.00 0.71 0.45 0.00 0.20 0.37 0.00 0.60Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 474 1665 1411 603 0 1228 823 0 1603 9080 749HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.9 10.7 9.4 15.3 0.0 15.0 11.7 0.0 9.0 17.6 0.0 18.0Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 2.4Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 3.1 1.3 0.3 0.0 3.0 1.5 0.0 0.81.2 0.0 1.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.0 11.6 9.8 15.5 0.0 16.8 12.3 0.0 9.2 18.2 0.0 20.4LnGrp LOS B B A B B B A B CApproach Vol, veh/h 742 396 377 283Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 16.7 11.1 19.3Approach LOS B B B BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 23.0 11.0 11.5 6.1 16.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.5 40.5 14.5 21.5 5.5 30.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 11.2 6.5 5.9 2.5 9.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.2 0.4 1.1 0.0 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.6HCM 7th LOS BPage 488 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM No-Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 10 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 11 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 20 11 11 0 - 0 Stage 1 11 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 997 1071 1609 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 997 - - - - - Stage 1 1012 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1609 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 489 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 98 898 157 73 726 59 171 151 57 82 163 122Future Volume (veh/h) 98 898 157 73 726 59 171 151 57 82 163 122Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 945 165 77 764 62 180 159 60 86 172 128Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 316 1403 245 226 1544 125 257 209 68 230 426 624Arrive On Green 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.39 0.39 0.390.39 0.39 0.39Sat Flow, veh/h 663 3024 528 508 3329 270 444 531 172 392 10831585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 555 555 77 408 418 399 0 0 258 0 128Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 663 1777 1775 508 1777 1822 1147 00 1475 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 15.4 15.4 8.8 10.1 10.1 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.2 15.4 15.4 24.2 10.1 10.1 21.5 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 3.4Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.15 0.45 0.15 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 316 824 824 226 824 845 534 0 0 656 0 624V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.67 0.67 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.21Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 349 915 914 252 915 938 636 0 0 771 0 741HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.1 13.2 13.2 22.6 11.8 11.8 19.4 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 12.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 5.6 5.7 1.0 3.5 3.6 5.6 0.0 0.02.4 0.0 1.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.7 14.9 14.9 23.5 12.2 12.2 23.4 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 12.8LnGrp LOS B B B C B B C B BApproach Vol, veh/h 1213 903 399 386Approach Delay, s/veh 15.2 13.2 23.4 13.6Approach LOS B B C BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.3 33.8 29.3 33.8Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 29.5 32.5 29.5 32.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 23.5 20.2 9.1 26.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 6.5 2.0 3.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 15.5HCM 7th LOS BPage 490 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 981 10 6 750 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Future Vol, veh/h 6 981 10 6 750 32 6 1 5 21 7 21Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 6 1044 11 6 798 34 6 1 5 22 7 22Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 832 0 0 1054 0 0 1876 1906 1049 1885 1895815 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1062 1062 - 828 828 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 814 845 - 1057 1067 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 801 - - 660 - - 55 69 276 54 70 377 Stage 1 - - - - - - 270 300 - 365 386 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 372 379 - 272 299 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 801 - - 660 - - 44 66 276 50 67 377Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 44 66 - 50 67 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 265 294 - 359 379 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 337 372 - 261 293 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.06 0.08 66.51 99.94HCM LOS F FMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 71 11 - - 14 - - 85HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.18 0.008 - - 0.01 - - 0.616HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 66.5 9.5 0 - 10.5 0 - 99.9HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - FHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 2.8Page 491 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.9Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 866 34 1 722 19 19Future Vol, veh/h 866 34 1 722 19 19Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 931 37 1 776 20 20Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 968 0 1728 949 Stage 1 - - - - 949 - Stage 2 - - - - 778 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 712 - 97 316 Stage 1 - - - - 376 - Stage 2 - - - - 453 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 712 - 97 316Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 97 - Stage 1 - - - - 376 - Stage 2 - - - - 451 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.01 38.23HCM LOS EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 148 - - 2 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.275 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 38.2 - - 10.1 0HCM Lane LOS E - - B AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - - 0 -Page 492 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.4Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 777 10 33 673 25 23Future Vol, veh/h 777 10 33 673 25 23Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 827 11 35 716 27 24Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 837 0 1618 832 Stage 1 - - - - 832 - Stage 2 - - - - 786 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 797 - 114 369 Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 - - - - 449 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 797 - 105 369Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 105 - Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 - - - - 416 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.45 37.63HCM LOS EMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 160 - - 84 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.319 - - 0.044 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 37.6 - - 9.7 0HCM Lane LOS E - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - - 0.1 -Page 493 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 PM Build 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 29 482 232 40 324 39 226 108 29 26 104 140Future Volume (veh/h) 29 482 232 40 324 39 226 108 29 26 104 140Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31 507 244 42 341 41 238 114 31 27 109 147Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 314 780 661 295 469 56 506 555 151 123 235 240Arrive On Green 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.39 0.390.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 712 1638 197 1781 1416 385 2101554 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 31 507 244 42 0 382 238 0 145 136 0 147Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 712 0 1835 1781 0 1801 1764 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 10.2 5.0 2.4 0.0 8.9 4.8 0.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 4.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 10.2 5.0 6.4 0.0 8.9 4.8 0.0 2.5 3.2 0.0 4.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.21 0.20 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 314 780 661 295 0 525 506 0 706 358 0 240V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.65 0.37 0.14 0.00 0.73 0.47 0.00 0.21 0.38 0.00 0.61Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 459 1645 1394 566 0 1225 756 0 1508 8760 722HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.0 11.0 9.5 16.0 0.0 15.2 12.3 0.0 9.5 18.3 0.0 18.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.9 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 2.5Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 3.5 1.4 0.4 0.0 3.4 1.7 0.0 0.81.3 0.0 1.5Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.1 11.9 9.8 16.3 0.0 17.1 12.9 0.0 9.6 19.0 0.0 21.3LnGrp LOS B B A B B B A B CApproach Vol, veh/h 782 424 383 283Approach Delay, s/veh 11.2 17.0 11.7 20.2Approach LOS B B B CTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 24.2 11.4 11.6 6.2 18.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.5 41.5 13.5 21.5 5.5 31.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 12.2 6.8 6.1 2.5 10.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 4.5 0.4 1.1 0.0 2.7Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.0HCM 7th LOS BPage 494 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 PM Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 3.4Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 33 0 0 9 10 35Future Vol, veh/h 33 0 0 9 10 35Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 35 0 0 9 11 37Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 38 29 47 0 - 0 Stage 1 29 - - - - - Stage 2 9 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1046 1560 - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1046 1560 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 974 - - - - - Stage 1 994 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.83 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1560 - 974 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.036 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.8 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - -Page 495 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 7 165 37 27 194 16 58 35 46 24 48 33Future Volume (veh/h) 7 165 37 27 194 16 58 35 46 24 48 33Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 236 53 39 277 23 83 50 66 34 69 47Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 617 804 177 620 923 76 395 113 115 348 323 375Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1079 2894 638 1090 3324 274 505 479 488 378 1365 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 143 146 39 147 153 199 0 0 103 0 47Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1079 1777 1756 1090 1777 1821 1472 0 0 1743 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 1.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.80.0 0.4Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.15 0.42 0.33 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 617 493 488 620 493 506 623 0 0 671 0 375V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.29 0.30 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.13Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1395 1774 1753 1406 1774 1818 1921 0 02081 0 1754HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.8 5.3 5.3 6.0 5.3 5.3 6.2 0.0 0.05.7 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.8 5.6 5.6 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.5 0.0 0.0 5.80.0 5.7LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 299 339 199 150Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 5.7 6.5 5.8Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 9.6 8.9 9.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 3.4 2.8 3.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 1.4 0.6 1.6Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.8HCM 7th LOS APage 496 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 219 1 6 223 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Future Vol, veh/h 6 219 1 6 223 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 300 1 8 305 10 4 3 1 21 5 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 315 0 0 301 0 0 642 649 301 645 645 310 Stage 1 - - - - - - 317 317 - 327 327 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 325 332 - 318 318 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 - - 1260 - - 387 389 739 385 391 730 Stage 1 - - - - - - 694 654 - 686 648 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 688 645 - 694 654 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 - - 1260 - - 366 383 739 376 385 730Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 366 383 - 376 385 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 689 649 - 680 643 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 659 640 - 684 649 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.2 14.05 13.37HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 406 48 - - 45 - - 475HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.007 - - 0.007 - - 0.095HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.1 7.9 0 - 7.9 0 - 13.4HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3Page 497 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM 9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 235 1 1 236 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 235 1 1 236 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 336 1 1 337 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 337 0 676 336 Stage 1 - - - - 336 - Stage 2 - - - - 340 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1222 - 419 706 Stage 1 - - - - 724 - Stage 2 - - - - 721 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1222 - 418 706Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 418 - Stage 1 - - - - 724 - Stage 2 - - - - 720 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 11.89HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 525 - - 8 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.9 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 498 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 226 3 1 203 4 3Future Vol, veh/h 226 3 1 203 4 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 328 4 1 294 6 4Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 332 0 627 330 Stage 1 - - - - 330 - Stage 2 - - - - 297 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1228 - 447 712 Stage 1 - - - - 729 - Stage 2 - - - - 754 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1228 - 447 712Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 447 - Stage 1 - - - - 729 - Stage 2 - - - - 753 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.04 11.9HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 532 - - 9 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.9 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 499 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 39 117 73 40 95 5 73 26 18 1 28 37Future Volume (veh/h) 39 117 73 40 95 5 73 26 18 1 28 37Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 165 103 56 134 7 103 37 25 1 39 52Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 445 673 570 402 275 14 525 369 249 120 215 186Arrive On Green 0.06 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.35 0.350.12 0.12 0.12Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1111 1762 92 1781 1041 703 26 1834 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 165 103 56 0 141 103 0 62 40 0 52Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1111 0 1854 1781 0 1744 1860 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 2.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 2.2 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.9Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 2.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 2.2 1.4 0.0 0.7 0.60.0 0.9Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.40 0.02 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 445 673 570 402 0 289 525 0 618 336 0 186V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.25 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.49 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.12 0.00 0.28Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 619 1633 1384 864 0 1060 645 0 1578 1230 0 951HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.7 7.1 6.9 11.8 0.0 12.1 8.9 0.0 6.8 12.5 0.0 12.7Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.8Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.20.2 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.8 7.3 7.1 12.0 0.0 13.4 9.1 0.0 6.9 12.7 0.0 13.5LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 323 197 165 92Approach Delay, s/veh 7.5 13.0 8.2 13.1Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 15.8 7.5 8.2 6.4 9.4Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.1 18.9 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 4.0 3.4 2.9 2.7 4.2Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.7HCM 7th LOS ANotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 500 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 Sunday 9-10 AM 13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 10 6 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 16 6 6 0 - 0 Stage 1 6 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1003 - - - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1615 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 501 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 7 168 38 28 198 16 59 36 47 24 49 34Future Volume (veh/h) 7 168 38 28 198 16 59 36 47 24 49 34Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 240 54 40 283 23 84 51 67 34 70 49Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 614 812 179 617 934 75 392 116 117 343 328 378Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1073 2893 639 1085 3330 269 503 485 491 370 1373 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 146 148 40 150 156 202 0 0 104 0 49Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1073 1777 1755 1085 1777 1822 1479 0 0 1743 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 1.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.80.0 0.5Prop In Lane 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.15 0.42 0.33 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 614 498 492 617 498 511 625 0 0 671 0 378V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.29 0.30 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.13Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1374 1757 1735 1385 1757 1801 1902 0 02061 0 1736HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.8 5.3 5.3 6.0 5.3 5.3 6.3 0.0 0.05.7 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.9 5.6 5.6 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.6 0.0 0.0 5.90.0 5.8LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 304 346 202 153Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 5.7 6.6 5.8Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 9.7 9.0 9.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.4 2.8 3.8Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 1.5 0.6 1.6Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.9HCM 7th LOS APage 502 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 223 1 6 227 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Future Vol, veh/h 6 223 1 6 227 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 305 1 8 311 10 4 3 1 21 5 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 321 0 0 307 0 0 653 660 306 655 655 316 Stage 1 - - - - - - 323 323 - 332 332 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 330 337 - 323 323 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1239 - - 1254 - - 381 383 734 379 385 725 Stage 1 - - - - - - 689 651 - 681 644 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 683 641 - 689 650 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1239 - - 1254 - - 359 377 734 370 379 725Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 359 377 - 370 379 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 684 645 - 676 639 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 654 636 - 679 645 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.2 14.19 13.5HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 400 47 - - 45 - - 468HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.007 - - 0.007 - - 0.096HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.2 7.9 0 - 7.9 0 - 13.5HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3Page 503 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build 9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 240 1 1 241 1 1Future Vol, veh/h 240 1 1 241 1 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 343 1 1 344 1 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 344 0 691 344 Stage 1 - - - - 344 - Stage 2 - - - - 347 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1215 - 411 699 Stage 1 - - - - 718 - Stage 2 - - - - 715 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1215 - 410 699Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 410 - Stage 1 - - - - 718 - Stage 2 - - - - 714 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.03 12HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 517 - - 7 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12 - - 8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 504 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 231 3 1 207 4 3Future Vol, veh/h 231 3 1 207 4 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 335 4 1 300 6 4Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 339 0 640 337 Stage 1 - - - - 337 - Stage 2 - - - - 303 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 440 705 Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 749 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 439 705Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 439 - Stage 1 - - - - 723 - Stage 2 - - - - 748 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.04 12.01HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 524 - - 9 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12 - - 8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 -Page 505 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 119 74 41 97 5 74 241 18 1 29 38Future Volume (veh/h) 40 119 74 41 97 5 74 241 18 1 29 38Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 168 104 58 137 7 104 339 25 1 41 54Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 428 655 555 387 271 14 551 650 48 114 273 236Arrive On Green 0.06 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.38 0.380.15 0.15 0.15Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1107 1764 90 1781 1721 127 19 1835 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 168 104 58 0 144 104 0 364 42 0 54Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1107 0 1854 1781 0 1848 1854 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 2.1 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.4 1.4 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 1.0Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 2.1 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.4 1.4 0.0 5.1 0.60.0 1.0Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.07 0.02 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 428 655 555 387 0 284 551 0 698 387 0 236V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.26 0.19 0.15 0.00 0.51 0.19 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.00 0.23Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 589 1554 1317 820 0 1009 671 0 1591 1151 0 896HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.3 7.7 7.5 12.5 0.0 12.9 8.7 0.0 8.0 12.3 0.0 12.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.5Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.0 1.40.2 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.4 7.9 7.6 12.7 0.0 14.3 8.8 0.0 8.6 12.4 0.0 12.9LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 328 202 468 96Approach Delay, s/veh 8.1 13.8 8.6 12.7Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 16.1 7.6 9.4 6.5 9.6Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.3 18.7 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 4.1 3.4 3.0 2.8 4.4Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.8Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.8HCM 7th LOS ANotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 506 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM No-Build 13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 7 4 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 10 6 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 16 6 6 0 - 0 Stage 1 6 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1003 1077 1615 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1003 - - - - - Stage 1 1017 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1615 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 507 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 7 218 38 30 203 16 59 36 60 24 49 34Future Volume (veh/h) 7 218 38 30 203 16 59 36 60 24 49 34Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 10 311 54 43 290 23 84 51 86 34 70 49Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 610 900 155 585 991 78 367 116 147 329 341 390Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.250.25 0.25 0.25Sat Flow, veh/h 1067 3033 521 1017 3337 263 467 473 599 350 1386 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 10 181 184 43 154 159 221 0 0 104 0 49Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1067 1777 1777 1017 1777 1823 1538 0 0 1736 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 1.6 1.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.3 1.3 1.3 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.90.0 0.5Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.14 0.38 0.39 0.33 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 610 528 527 585 528 541 631 0 0 670 0 390V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.34 0.35 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.13Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1296 1669 1669 1238 1669 1712 1822 0 01950 0 1650HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.9 5.4 5.4 6.3 5.3 5.3 6.5 0.0 0.05.9 0.0 5.8Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.00.2 0.0 0.1Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.4 5.6 5.6 6.8 0.0 0.0 6.00.0 5.9LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 375 356 221 153Approach Delay, s/veh 5.8 5.7 6.8 6.0Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 10.3 9.3 10.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 3.6 2.9 4.3Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 1.9 0.6 1.7Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.0HCM 7th LOS APage 508 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 6 286 1 6 234 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Future Vol, veh/h 6 286 1 6 234 7 3 2 1 15 4 14Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 392 1 8 321 10 4 3 1 21 5 19Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 330 0 0 393 0 0 749 755 392 751 751 325 Stage 1 - - - - - - 409 409 - 342 342 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 340 347 - 410 410 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1229 - - 1165 - - 328 338 656 327 339 716 Stage 1 - - - - - - 619 596 - 673 638 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 675 635 - 619 596 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1229 - - 1165 - - 309 332 656 318 334 716Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 309 332 - 318 334 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 614 591 - 667 633 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 646 630 - 609 591 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.16 0.2 15.61 14.62HCM LOS C BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 348 37 - - 43 - - 419HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.007 - - 0.007 - - 0.108HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.6 7.9 0 - 8.1 0 - 14.6HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.4Page 509 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build 9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.6Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 240 63 32 241 4 4Future Vol, veh/h 240 63 32 241 4 4Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 343 90 46 344 6 6Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 433 0 824 388 Stage 1 - - - - 388 - Stage 2 - - - - 436 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1127 - 343 660 Stage 1 - - - - 686 - Stage 2 - - - - 652 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1127 - 326 660Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 326 - Stage 1 - - - - 686 - Stage 2 - - - - 619 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.98 13.47HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 436 - - 211 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.041 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.5 - - 8.3 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -Page 510 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.8Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 234 3 32 238 7 6Future Vol, veh/h 234 3 32 238 7 6Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 69 69 69 69 69 69Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 339 4 46 345 10 9Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 343 0 779 341 Stage 1 - - - - 341 - Stage 2 - - - - 438 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 364 701 Stage 1 - - - - 720 - Stage 2 - - - - 651 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 347 701Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 347 - Stage 1 - - - - 720 - Stage 2 - - - - 620 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.96 13.3HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 453 - - 213 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - 0.038 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.3 - - 8.1 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 -Page 511 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 40 124 75 41 147 5 86 241 18 1 29 38Future Volume (veh/h) 40 124 75 41 147 5 86 241 18 1 29 38Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 175 106 58 207 7 121 339 25 1 41 54Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 412 710 601 415 346 12 536 629 46 107 257 222Arrive On Green 0.06 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.37 0.370.14 0.14 0.14Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1098 1799 61 1781 1721 127 19 1835 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 175 106 58 0 214 121 0 364 42 0 54Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1098 0 1859 1781 0 1848 1854 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 2.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 3.7 1.8 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 1.1Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 2.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 3.7 1.8 0.0 5.5 0.70.0 1.1Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.07 0.02 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 412 710 601 415 0 357 536 0 676 364 0 222V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.25 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.60 0.23 0.00 0.54 0.12 0.00 0.24Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 558 1456 1234 764 0 948 638 0 1491 10680 830HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.2 7.5 7.3 12.2 0.0 13.0 9.5 0.0 8.8 13.4 0.0 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.6Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.4 0.5 0.0 1.60.3 0.0 0.3Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.3 7.7 7.4 12.3 0.0 14.6 9.7 0.0 9.5 13.5 0.0 14.1LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 337 272 485 96Approach Delay, s/veh 7.9 14.1 9.6 13.8Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.4 17.9 8.0 9.4 6.6 11.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.5 18.5 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 4.3 3.8 3.1 2.8 5.7Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.5HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 512 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 Sunday 9-10 AM Build 13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.6Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 7 4 31Future Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 7 4 31Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 10 6 44Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 38 28 50 0 - 0 Stage 1 28 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1047 1557 - - - Stage 1 995 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 974 1047 1557 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 974 - - - - - Stage 1 995 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.71 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1557 - 974 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.7 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - -Page 513 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 11 AM-12 PM3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 165 43 41 311 33 72 74 51 40 55 27Future Volume (veh/h) 20 165 43 41 311 33 72 74 51 40 55 27Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 177 46 44 334 35 77 80 55 43 59 29Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 589 803 203 657 929 97 369 164 95 388 286 374Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1013 2808 711 1158 3248 338 459 695 405 491 1213 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 110 113 44 182 187 212 0 0 102 0 29Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1013 1777 1742 1158 1777 1810 1559 0 0 1704 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.5 1.6 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.80.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.19 0.36 0.26 0.42 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 589 508 498 657 508 518 628 0 0 674 0 374V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.22 0.23 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1295 1746 1713 1463 1746 1779 1956 0 01996 0 1726HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 5.1 5.1 5.7 5.3 5.4 6.3 0.0 0.05.8 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.1 5.3 5.4 5.7 5.8 5.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.90.0 5.7LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 245 413 212 131Approach Delay, s/veh 5.4 5.8 6.7 5.9Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 9.9 8.9 9.9Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.9 2.8 3.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.1 0.5 2.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.9HCM 7th LOS APage 514 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 259 1 2 345 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Future Vol, veh/h 7 259 1 2 345 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 278 1 2 371 1 6 6 2 14 3 17Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 372 0 0 280 0 0 671 670 279 673 670 372 Stage 1 - - - - - - 294 294 - 376 376 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 377 376 - 297 295 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1186 - - 1283 - - 370 378 760 369 378 674 Stage 1 - - - - - - 714 670 - 645 617 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 645 616 - 712 669 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1186 - - 1283 - - 354 374 760 358 374 674Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 354 374 - 358 374 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 709 665 - 644 615 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 624 615 - 698 664 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.04 14.52 13.25HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 393 47 - - 10 - - 470HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.006 - - 0.002 - - 0.073HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.5 8.1 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.3HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2Page 515 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 278 1 1 364 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 278 1 1 364 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 302 1 1 396 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 303 0 701 303 Stage 1 - - - - 303 - Stage 2 - - - - 398 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1258 - 405 737 Stage 1 - - - - 749 - Stage 2 - - - - 679 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1258 - 405 737Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 405 - Stage 1 - - - - 749 - Stage 2 - - - - 678 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.02 12.97HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 456 - - 5 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 516 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 251 3 2 331 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 251 3 2 331 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 270 3 2 356 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 273 0 632 272 Stage 1 - - - - 272 - Stage 2 - - - - 360 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1290 - 445 767 Stage 1 - - - - 774 - Stage 2 - - - - 706 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1290 - 444 767Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 444 - Stage 1 - - - - 774 - Stage 2 - - - - 704 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.05 12.32HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 496 - - 11 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.3 - - 7.8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 517 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2025 11 AM-12 PM 15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 52 84 116 57 143 18 126 40 26 13 41 61Future Volume (veh/h) 52 84 116 57 143 18 126 40 26 13 41 61Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 90 125 61 154 19 135 43 28 14 44 66Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 425 684 580 414 279 34 529 387 252 167 186 198Arrive On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.37 0.370.12 0.12 0.12Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1166 1633 201 1781 1058 689 272 1487 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 90 125 61 0 173 135 0 71 58 0 66Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1166 0 1834 1781 0 1746 1759 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.1 1.8 1.5 0.0 2.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.1 1.8 1.5 0.0 2.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 0.90.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.39 0.24 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 684 580 414 0 313 529 0 639 353 0 198V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.55 0.26 0.00 0.11 0.16 0.00 0.33Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 583 1534 1300 841 0 985 642 0 1485 10700 865HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.1 7.1 7.3 12.2 0.0 12.7 9.3 0.0 7.0 13.2 0.0 13.4Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.20.3 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.2 7.2 7.5 12.3 0.0 14.2 9.5 0.0 7.1 13.5 0.0 14.4LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 271 234 206 124Approach Delay, s/veh 7.7 13.7 8.7 13.9Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.8 16.8 8.1 8.7 6.5 10.2Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 3.8 3.9 3.3 2.8 4.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.6HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 518 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2025 11 AM-12 PM13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 3 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 9 3 3 0 - 0 Stage 1 3 - - - - - Stage 2 5 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1012 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1619 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 519 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 168 44 42 317 34 73 75 52 41 56 28Future Volume (veh/h) 20 168 44 42 317 34 73 75 52 41 56 28Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 181 47 45 341 37 78 81 56 44 60 30Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 584 813 206 654 936 101 367 166 97 385 289 377Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 1005 2808 711 1153 3236 349 458 699 407 489 1213 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 113 115 45 186 192 215 0 0 104 0 30Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1005 1777 1742 1153 1777 1808 1564 0 0 1703 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.9 1.0 0.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.90.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.19 0.36 0.26 0.42 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 584 514 504 654 514 523 630 0 0 674 0 377V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.22 0.23 0.07 0.36 0.37 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1270 1726 1693 1440 1726 1756 1933 0 01972 0 1706HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 5.1 5.1 5.7 5.4 5.4 6.4 0.0 0.05.9 0.0 5.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.00.1 0.0 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.2 5.3 5.4 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.00.0 5.7LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 250 423 215 134Approach Delay, s/veh 5.4 5.8 6.7 5.9Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 10.0 9.0 10.0Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 3.9 2.9 3.6Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.1 0.5 2.1Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 5.9HCM 7th LOS APage 520 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 264 1 2 352 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Future Vol, veh/h 7 264 1 2 352 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 284 1 2 378 1 6 6 2 14 3 17Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 380 0 0 285 0 0 684 683 284 685 683 379 Stage 1 - - - - - - 299 299 - 383 383 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 384 384 - 302 300 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1179 - - 1277 - - 363 371 755 362 371 668 Stage 1 - - - - - - 709 666 - 639 612 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 639 611 - 707 666 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1179 - - 1277 - - 347 368 755 351 368 668Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 347 368 - 351 368 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 704 661 - 638 611 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 618 610 - 693 661 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.04 14.7 13.4HCM LOS B BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 386 46 - - 10 - - 463HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.006 - - 0.002 - - 0.074HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.7 8.1 0 - 7.8 0 - 13.4HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.2Page 521 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 284 1 1 371 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 284 1 1 371 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 309 1 1 403 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 310 0 715 309 Stage 1 - - - - 309 - Stage 2 - - - - 405 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 398 731 Stage 1 - - - - 744 - Stage 2 - - - - 673 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1251 - 397 731Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 397 - Stage 1 - - - - 744 - Stage 2 - - - - 672 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.02 13.11HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 448 - - 5 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.001 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.1 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 522 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.1Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 256 3 2 338 3 1Future Vol, veh/h 256 3 2 338 3 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 275 3 2 363 3 1Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 278 0 645 277 Stage 1 - - - - 277 - Stage 2 - - - - 368 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1284 - 437 762 Stage 1 - - - - 770 - Stage 2 - - - - 700 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1284 - 436 762Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 436 - Stage 1 - - - - 770 - Stage 2 - - - - 699 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.05 12.44HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 488 - - 11 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.002 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.4 - - 7.8 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -Page 523 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Future Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 92 127 62 157 19 139 44 29 14 45 67Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 425 687 582 414 282 34 529 385 254 165 187 198Arrive On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.37 0.370.13 0.13 0.13Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1162 1637 198 1781 1052 693 267 1495 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 92 127 62 0 176 139 0 73 59 0 67Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1162 0 1835 1781 0 1746 1761 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.6 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.6 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.9 1.00.0 1.3Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.40 0.24 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 687 582 414 0 316 529 0 639 352 0 198V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.56 0.26 0.00 0.11 0.17 0.00 0.34Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 579 1524 1291 833 0 978 638 0 1474 10630 859HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.1 7.1 7.4 12.2 0.0 12.8 9.3 0.0 7.1 13.3 0.0 13.5Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.20.3 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.2 7.2 7.5 12.4 0.0 14.3 9.6 0.0 7.2 13.6 0.0 14.5LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 276 238 212 126Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 13.8 8.7 14.1Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.9 16.9 8.1 8.7 6.6 10.3Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 3.9 4.0 3.3 2.8 5.0Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.9Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.6HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 524 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM No-Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 5 3 0Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 3 0Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 9 3 3 0 - 0 Stage 1 3 - - - - - Stage 2 5 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1012 1081 1619 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1012 - - - - - Stage 1 1020 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1619 - - - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 0 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - -Page 525 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build3: Wooddale & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 20 173 44 54 367 34 73 75 54 41 56 28Future Volume (veh/h) 20 173 44 54 367 34 73 75 54 41 56 28Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 186 47 58 395 37 78 81 58 44 60 30Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 569 879 217 662 1023 95 353 166 99 372 288 375Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.24 0.240.24 0.24 0.24Sat Flow, veh/h 956 2825 697 1147 3286 306 452 701 421 483 1220 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 115 118 58 213 219 217 0 0 104 0 30Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 956 1777 1745 1147 1777 1815 15750 0 1703 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.9 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.90.0 0.3Prop In Lane 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.17 0.36 0.27 0.42 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 569 553 543 662 553 565 618 0 0 660 0 375V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.21 0.22 0.09 0.38 0.39 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.08Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1161 1653 1623 1372 1653 1688 1853 0 01888 0 1634HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 5.0 5.1 5.7 5.4 5.4 6.7 0.0 0.06.1 0.0 5.9Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.00.2 0.0 0.0Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 6.3 5.2 5.3 5.8 5.8 5.8 7.0 0.0 0.0 6.30.0 6.0LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A AApproach Vol, veh/h 255 490 217 134Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 5.8 7.0 6.2Approach LOS A A A ATimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 10.7 9.2 10.7Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 18.5 20.5 18.5Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 4.2 2.9 3.9Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 1.2 0.5 2.4Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.0HCM 7th LOS APage 526 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build6: Arden & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 7 271 1 2 414 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Future Vol, veh/h 7 271 1 2 414 1 6 6 2 13 3 16Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 291 1 2 445 1 6 6 2 14 3 17Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 446 0 0 292 0 0 758 758 292 760 758 446 Stage 1 - - - - - - 307 307 - 450 450 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 451 451 - 310 308 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1114 - - 1269 - - 323 337 747 323 337 613 Stage 1 - - - - - - 703 661 - 589 572 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 588 571 - 701 661 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1114 - - 1269 - - 308 333 747 312 333 613Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 308 333 - 312 333 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 697 656 - 587 570 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 567 570 - 686 655 -Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.21 0.04 15.79 14.41HCM LOS C BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 349 45 - - 9 - - 417HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 0.007 - - 0.002 - - 0.083HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.8 8.3 0 - 7.8 0 - 14.4HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0.3Page 527 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build9: access & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.2Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 284 7 3 402 34 31Future Vol, veh/h 284 7 3 402 34 31Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 309 8 3 437 37 34Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 316 0 756 312 Stage 1 - - - - 312 - Stage 2 - - - - 443 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 376 728 Stage 1 - - - - 742 - Stage 2 - - - - 647 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1244 - 375 728Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 375 - Stage 1 - - - - 742 - Stage 2 - - - - 645 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.06 13.63HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 487 - - 13 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.145 - - 0.003 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.6 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0 -Page 528 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build11: Indianola & W. 50th StSynchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 1.3Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 287 3 5 341 34 31Future Vol, veh/h 287 3 5 341 34 31Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 319 3 6 379 38 34Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1Conflicting Flow All 0 0 322 0 711 321 Stage 1 - - - - 321 - Stage 2 - - - - 390 -Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1238 - 400 720 Stage 1 - - - - 736 - Stage 2 - - - - 684 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1238 - 397 720Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 397 - Stage 1 - - - - 736 - Stage 2 - - - - 680 -Approach EB WB NBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.11 13.3HCM LOS BMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBTCapacity (veh/h) 506 - - 26 -HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.143 - - 0.004 -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.3 - - 7.9 0HCM Lane LOS B - - A AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0 -Page 529 of 746 HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build15: Halifax/Market & W. 50th St Synchro 12 ReportMovement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Future Volume (veh/h) 53 86 118 58 146 18 129 41 27 13 42 62Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Work Zone On Approach No No No NoAdj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 59 96 131 64 162 20 143 46 30 14 47 69Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Cap, veh/h 425 693 587 414 287 35 527 387 252 162 190 199Arrive On Green 0.06 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.37 0.370.13 0.13 0.13Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1154 1633 202 1781 1057 689 256 1508 1585Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 96 131 64 0 182 143 0 76 61 0 69Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1154 0 1834 1781 0 1746 1764 0 1585Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.2 1.9 1.7 0.0 3.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.4Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.2 1.9 1.7 0.0 3.1 2.1 0.0 1.0 1.00.0 1.4Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.39 0.23 1.00Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 693 587 414 0 323 527 0 639 351 0 199V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.56 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.35Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 574 1506 1276 819 0 967 631 0 1457 10520 849HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.1 7.1 7.4 12.3 0.0 12.9 9.4 0.0 7.2 13.5 0.0 13.6Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.30.4 0.0 0.4Unsig. Movement Delay, s/vehLnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 9.3 7.2 7.6 12.5 0.0 14.4 9.7 0.0 7.3 13.7 0.0 14.7LnGrp LOS A A A B B A A B BApproach Vol, veh/h 286 246 219 130Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 13.9 8.9 14.2Approach LOS A B A BTimer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 7 8Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 17.2 8.2 8.8 6.6 10.5Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 27.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 3.9 4.1 3.4 2.8 5.1Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.0Intersection SummaryHCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.7HCM 7th LOS BNotesUser approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.Page 530 of 746 HCM 7th TWSC 2027 11 AM-12 PM Build13: Indianola & access Synchro 12 ReportIntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 7.5Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsTraffic Vol, veh/h 62 0 0 5 3 3Future Vol, veh/h 62 0 0 5 3 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free FreeRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length 0 - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 67 0 0 5 3 3Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2Conflicting Flow All 10 5 6 0 - 0 Stage 1 5 - - - - - Stage 2 5 - - - - -Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 1078 1614 - - - Stage 1 1018 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1010 1078 1614 - - -Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1010 - - - - - Stage 1 1018 - - - - - Stage 2 1018 - - - - -Approach EB NB SBHCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.82 0 0HCM LOS AMinor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBRCapacity (veh/h) 1614 - 1010 - -HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.066 - -HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - 8.8 - -HCM Lane LOS A - A - -HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - -Page 531 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.1 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Title: Resolution 2026-02: Accepting Donations Action Requested: Approve resolution 2026-02 accepting donations. Information/Background: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two-thirds majority of the Council. Supporting Documentation: None Page 532 of 746 Resolution 2026-02: Accepting Donations Whereas Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens and; Whereas said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two-thirds majority of its members. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Senior Center Aurora on France 13 Prizes Bingo Wonderland Event Forty-Forty Flats Cookie Tins Holiday Cookie Exchange Edina Modern Denstistry Treats Noon Year's Eve Bash Janie Hays $100 General Use Edina Parks & Recreation The Gameshow Studio Two Prizes Puzzles, Pizza and Pints American Swedish Institute Four Admission Passes Puzzles, Pizza and Pints Sip N' Bloom Four Tickets to Floral Class Puzzles, Pizza and Pints Golden Years $5,644.65 Playground Equipment at Weber Park Edina Community Foundation $15,769.51 Connect Card Scholarship Fund Christine Roth $350.00 Tree Donation William Hybben $350.00 Tree Donation Edina Fire Department Thurl and Dee Quigley $100.00 General Use J. Patrick and Linda M. Smith $250.00 General Use Edina Art Center Barbara J. Shelton $100.00 In Memory of Monica Sullivan Dated: January 20, 2026 Page 533 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.2 Department: Parks & Recreation Item Activity: Discussion Information Prepared By: Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director Item Title: Presentation on Braemar Ice Arena Concept Plan Action Requested: No action requested, for discussion and information. Information/Background: Braemar Park Master Plan At 500 acres, Braemar Park is the largest recreational space in the City of Edina. It is home to Braemar Golf Course, Braemar Golf Dome, Braemar Arena, Braemar Sports Dome and Field, and Courtney Fields. The Braemar Park Master Plan Improvements includes improving the connectivity of trail systems, access, and wayfinding to park amenities and facilities; providing separated use trail systems to accommodate walkers, mountain bikers and cross-country skiers; identifying new site improvements and recreational amenities to enhance existing facilities; developing and improving the quality of natural resources in the park; incorporating sustainable site improvements to promote land water resources; and investing in facility infrastructure are goals of the master plan. The Braemar Park Master Plan was adopted by the Edina City Council in 2018 and amended in 2022. However, the process to develop the plan began much earlier and included comprehensive engagement and feedback. Master Plan and Plan Amendment Highlights The Braemar Park Master Plan (BMP) has many facets that appeal to a wide variety of users. The plan includes A) Trail investments, such as increases in pedestrian trails, improving the experience of Hillary Lane into a parkway like feel, adding an off-road trail or mountain biking system, and additional ski trail opportunities. B) Site improvements to Courtney Field include adding a playground, upgraded field lighting, seating enhancements, safety netting, field drainage and irrigation improvements for enhanced playability, entrance improvements and warm up areas. Site improvements to the Braemar Golf Course area consist of ADA accessibility improvements and the addition of pickleball and platform tennis courts. C) Natural Resource improvements, as one of the largest investments will be in the restoration of major plant communities by investing in stewardship enhancements. The master plan includes upland, lowland, wooded and wetland communities for improvement. Many areas are overrun by invasive species such as buckthorn and garlic mustard, while others have lost tree and plant communities due to flooding and drought. The master plan does not include any artificial snow making or maintained sledding areas, nor does it make investments in the golf course or driving range. Page 534 of 746 In 2022, staff recommended making amendments to the BMP. The amendments were supported by the Park and Recreation Commission and adopted by the City Council. They consisted of the inclusion of 1) Arena Complex Capital Infrastructure, 2) A Community Driven Special Project Request for Braemar Ice Arena Expansion, and 3) Facility Study and Revenue Needs Assessments for Golf Clubhouse and Golf Dome (non-referendum funded amendment). The Master Plan, including amendments, were the basis of the Local Option Sales Tax Referendums that passed in 2022 and 2023. 2022 Parks and Recreation Commission Action: The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed and discussed the proposed amendments to the BMP at their April 12 and May 10, 2022, meetings. The Commission voted 7-0 to recommend the master plan amendments to the City Council for adoption at their May 17, 2022, meeting. Their discussion comments on the vote pertained to ensuring that a long-term strategy for ongoing capital expenses is developed for the existing arena amenities as if expansion to a fourth indoor ice sheet was eventually authorized. They also supported the proposed forward-looking golf studies, to ensure that the facilities are well positioned in the future to keep up with market competition and continue to support user needs and the revenue generation of improved enterprise operations. 2022 City Council Action: At their May 17, 2022, regular meeting, the City Council voted to amend the BMP with the proposed amendments. That action then resulted in two successful local option sales tax referendums in 2022 and 2023 authorizing a total of $45.2M for the Braemar Arena project. 2025/2026 Commission Work Plan The Parks and Recreation Commission is involved with Initiative 1.5.1 by providing the community perspective on the Braemar Arena infrastructure and expansion. The initiative group consisting of members Wick, Hulbert, Spaulding and Student Commissioner Syed reviewed the concept plan in October 2025 and provided feedback to date. At the January 13, 2026, meeting, the full commission provided the below summary feedback on the overall preferred concept, infrastructure investment and accessory amenity improvements. Parks and Recreation Commission feedback: • Supportive of overall concept for infrastructure investment and expansion. • Supportive of expanded food and beverage, including potential for beer and wine alcohol sales with standard operational concerns of implementation. • Desired to find a pathway for new western entrance concept and fourth rink enhancements. • Supportive of studying/reviewing Lewis Park as a partnership concept. • Supportive of studying naming rights (Initiative 1.5.4 Research and, if feasible, develop an action plan or further research of no more than two Alternative Funding Strategies to progress that initiative) for this project. Page 535 of 746 City Council Concept Review At the meeting staff will present the core concept for investment and expansion including the related budget for the project. Staff will also be asking for feedback to continue to refine and continue progress on the project. Of the specific items staff will be requesting feedback, but not any formal decision at this time, is on the following: Sustainable Building Policy This project does fall within the City’s Sustainable Building Policy. For this project staff have determined that the best course of action is to select the LEED pathway over B3 certification to also comply with the B3 Design Guidelines' Energy Efficiency Standard SB2030. By nature, ice arena facilities are not considered green buildings due to the high energy use and at its core function keeping ice as an athlete surface and spectators comfortable. Project staff have been discussing the potential for LEED pointing and with support of the Sustainability Manager feel an appropriate waiver is to pursue LEED Certified rather than LEED Silver. Some of the challenges with reaching LEED Silver status relate to the inability to receive points in the category of Location and Transportation due to the lack of surrounding density, lack of diverse land use, and lack of quality transit in the area. Another challenge is that the potential points for Daylighting are not compatible with performance venues that impact athletic pursuits while in this case on ice causing potential glare and shadows for participants. Regarding PV Solar, the existing roof structures are not compatible to support new installations, and the new expansion construction will be required to provide support for current roofing to better connect these individual rinks. These are mainly the overall challenges of renovating original ice arena infrastructure from the 1960’s, 1980’s, 1990’s, 2010’s and now 2020 era construction activity. A LEED Certified target will still provide a maximum amount of benefits in support of the Climate Action Plan goals by integrating water efficiency, enhanced commissioning of the various eras of facility age, enhanced refrigeration management, optimized energy performance with the new infrastructure, and by taking a holistic approach to EV Charger installations within the entire Braemar Park complex to support Courtney Fields, Braemar Sports Dome, Braemar Golf Dome, Braemar Golf Course and Braemar Arena with a phased installation plan. A formal Sustainable Bulding Policy Waiver request will come forward at a later date for City Council review. Project Enhancement Opportunities In addition to the core concept to invest in and expand Braemar Arena, staff has identified additional aspects of construction that would further enhance the project, and those enhancements are highly desired by stakeholders, the commission members and by staff. The first is to fully enhance the new north rink by creating additional seating capacity, installing additional technology and improved amenities such as a center hung scoreboard. The other is to fully connect the arena by creating a new western entrance to fully provide access to the four rinks, as well as better visibility to the tenant spaces. Page 536 of 746 Alternate Funding Opportunities The Parks and Recreation Commission has two Work Plan initiatives that overlap with the related work for the Braemar Ice Arena project. The first (1.5.1) as mentioned above is to provide the community perspective on the investment and expansion. The second (1.5.4) is to conduct a deeper review of alternate funding opportunities. In this case a method that is becoming increasingly common in the municipal sector is the pursuit of naming rights and sponsorships. What was once for mainly professional sport venues has become commonplace at Colleges and Universities and has now become widely accepted at the local level. Stakeholders, commission members and staff believe that this is something that should be considered for this project to provide an avenue to potentially fund potential enhancements to the project. Staff also believe that this method could provide a long-term funding stream for the future to provide needed resources to make the arena more sustainable by creating a future source of funding to repair and replace capital infrastructure decades from now when this investment begins to age out. Staff requests feedback to explore naming rights as a potential alternate funding opportunity. This would be done by conducting an asset evaluation to test the market for this concept. Many peer cities have currently done this as well as are pursuing. Staff would not look at a presenting sponsor for the Arena nor a naming right for the west rink, but at this time review other facility assets for this opportunity. This would not commit the city to go further than gathering the information and then considering if the approach is in the best interest of the project, the arena and the community. Summary The Parks & Recreation Department has many amenity offerings in its park system. Upon completion of the Braemar Park master plan, Arena infrastructure improvements and expansion are completed, Braemar Park and Arena will arguably be one of the best such facility in the metro area and beyond with its athlete’s first focus. Resources/Financial Impacts: This project is to improve and expand Braemar Ice Arena by improving the quality of the ice, adding a fourth indoor rink and improving the user experience with a focus on being an athlete first facility. This is being funded by the Local Option Sales Tax referendums that occurred in 2022 and 2023 that provided $45.2M for the project. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: The Braemar Park Master Plan was adopted by the Edina City Council in 2018 and amended in 2022. The project was funded by two successful referendum votes in 2022 and 2023 authorizing a total of $45.2M for the Braemar Arena portion of the project. Strong Foundation Reliable Service Livable City Better Together Page 537 of 746 Values Impact: Engagement This project directly impacts the Edina High School, Edina Hockey Association, Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, Breakaway Academy, General Sports, Ikola Cup members and Da Beauty League as well as tournament organizers all of which have provided feedback. The general community voted in 2022 and 2023 to fund this project. Health The primary focus for this project is to improve and expand for all users as an athlete first facility. Sustainability This project will provided needed upgrades to the physical capital infrastructure that will operate more efficiently saving energy, reducing carbon use and support aspects of the Climate Action Plan. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. Braemar Ice Arena Concept Plan Presentation (Board Portal) Page 538 of 746 CONCEPT PRESENTATIONBRAEMAR ICE ARENA UPGRADES & EXPANSIONScan here to sign up for additional updates on the Braemar Expansion Project.Page 539 of 746 PROJECT RECAPProject kickoffInitial stakeholder engagementProgramming completedPredesign completedKnutson Construction brought onBuilding assessment performedSchematic scoping & cost estimating✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Page 540 of 746 STAKEHOLDER INPUTMORE STORAGEBETTER LOCKER ROOM FACILITIESADDITIONAL ICE TIMEENHANCED MEETING SPACEFOURTH INDOOR RINKFOOD & BEVERAGEIMPROVED CONCESSIONSOUTDOOR RINKEXPANDED RETAIL SPACEIMPROVED ARENA VISIBILITYMERCHANDISE PARTNERSHIPSHEALTH AND RECOVERY SERVICESPHYSICAL THERAPY OPTIONSMAINTAIN EDINA HOCKEY TRADITIONSPRESERVE HISTORIC WEST SPECTATOR EXPERIENCEHEALTHY FOOD OPTIONSRESTAURANT/BARTECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTSTICKETING MODERNIZATIONBETTER LOBBY FLOWEXPANDED MERCHANDISE OFFERINGSRUN MULTIPLE TOURNAMENTSOPERATIONAL SPACEMORE LOCKER ROOM BATHROOMS AND SHOWERSTRAINING SPACEBETTER RINK TEMPERATURE CONTROLADDITIONAL ATHLETIC OPPORTUNITIESCLASSROOM SPACEWORKOUT SPACESHOOTING AND STICK HANDLING AREASCOMMUNITY & HERITAGEFACILITY UPGRADESICE AVAILABILITYFOOD SERVICE• The City, JLG, and Tegra met with group representatives to discuss how the facility is currently used, what improvements each group would most like to see, what types of amenities and features would be most welcome, how Edina hockey history should be incorporated, and what types of updates would best improve the user experience.• Groups included IKOLA Cup members, Breakaway Academy, Edina High School, Edina Hockey Association (EHA), The Braemar-City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, General Sports, and tournament operators.• Meetings were held with key stakeholder groups December 9th–11th, 2024. Page 541 of 746 PROJECT PRIORITIES COMMUNITY & HERITAGE |FACILITY UPGRADES |ICE AVAILABILITY |SPECTATOR EXPERIENCE |FOOD & BEVERAGE |TECHNOLOGY & ACCESSIBILITY | Preserving the history of Edina Hockey while modernizing facilities.Improved locker rooms, additional storage, better meeting spaces.Demand for a fourth rink and optimized scheduling.More comfortable seating, improved concessions, and a possible restaurant/bar.Interest in a food operator, healthier food choices, and potential alcohol sales.Enhanced AV capabilities for team meetings and tournament operations.COMMON STAKEHOLDER PRIORITIESCORE PROJECT PRINCIPLESImproving the quality of iceAdding a fourth indoor rinkImproving the user experience with a focus on Braemar Arena being an Athlete-First Facility1. 2. 3. Page 542 of 746 ICE QUALITY UPGRADESKey Benefi ts for Skaters, Coaches, and Fans1. Better Ice Surface – Smooth, Consistent, and Reliable• Brand-new east fl oor with heating system ensures the ice stays level and consistent.• A smoother sheet of ice means fewer ruts, easier maintenance, and better skating conditions for athletes and performers.2. Reliable Cooling System – Ice Always Ready When You Need It• Upgraded refrigeration system with more effi cient equipment.• Reduces the risk of cancellations or delays due to mechanical issues - giving teams, skaters, and fans confi dence the ice will be ready for games, practices, and shows.3. Clearer, Stronger Ice – Great Skating Experience & Better Visibility• New water fi ltration and hot water system creates crystal-clear ice.• Logos, lines, and sponsorships will look sharper, and the ice will stay cleaner with less snow build-up during use.4. More Comfortable Environment – For Both Athletes and Fans• New dehumidifi cation and heating systems in all rinks.• Keeps humidity under control, which means more comfortable air for players and spectators, less fogging/condensation, and higher quality ice.FACILITY EXPANSIONMore Space, More Comfort, More Connections1. A Brand-New Indoor Rink• Converts the existing “Backyard” rink into a fully enclosed, year-round space.• Includes spectator seating so more families and fans can enjoy the action.• Improved sightlines into the East and North rinks so games and practices are easier to watch.• Added team rooms and storage provide athletes and coaches with the space they need.• Expanded lobby commons and new public restrooms improve comfort and convenience for all visitors.2. A Central Hub for All Rinks• A redesigned public corridor will connect all four rinks, making it easier for guests, families, and teams to navigate the building.• Creates a true community feel - teams, fans, and skaters can meet, gather, and celebrate together.• Upgraded concessions off er more food and beverage options for fans and families.• Improved access to guest services ensures help is always close at hand.• Better access to north retail/tenant spaces makes shopping and amenities more convenient.3. Built with The Future in Mind• Incorporates energy-effi cient and environmentally friendly design choices that lower operating costs and support a greener future.EXPERIENCE IMPROVEMENTSWhat Visitors, Athletes, and Fans Will Notice1. Easier and Safer Arrival• Clearer traffi c fl ow and site signage make it simple to fi nd your way in and out.• A new drop-off lane at the main entrance improves convenience for families and teams.• Accessible walkways from the parking lot ensure safe and easy access for everyone.• Updated landscaping enhances the look and feel of the facility right from the curb.2. Fresh, Modern Interior• Upgrades throughout create a clean and welcoming atmosphere through refreshed fi nishes and remodeled spaces.• Replacement of worn or outdated items like doors, plumbing fi xtures, benches, and amenities ensures a polished, professional environment.• New LED lighting brightens the entire building while cutting down on energy costs.3. True Accessibility for All• Fully ADA-compliant restrooms and showers for athletes and guests.• Handrails added in West Rink and other spectator seating areas for safety.• Dedicated wheelchair viewing platforms at each rink so everyone has a great view of the action.• Accessible design for all team rooms so every athlete has equal access to the facilities.CORE PROJECT PRINCIPLESPage 543 of 746 THE MISSIONImprove and expand Braemar Arena for all users as an athlete-first facility.Page 544 of 746 3D SITE VIEW OF PROPOSED CORE CONCEPTSOUTH RINKWEST RINKEAST RINKNEW FOURTHINDOOR RINKTENANTSPACENEW EXPANDEDLOBBY CIRCULATIONUS 169 FRONTAGE ROADBRAEMAR BLVDNBRAEMAR FIELDSOUTH PARKING LOTFACILITYEXPANSIONABCDView of lobby expansion from existing lobbyView of fourth indoor rink from lobby expansionView of new fourth indoor rink from upper concourseView of new fourth indoor rink ice levelBCDAPage 545 of 746 3D SITE VIEW OF PROPOSED CORE CONCEPT - SOUTH PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTSUS 169 FRONTAGE ROADBRAEMAR BLVDNNew fullyaccessible crosswalkDedicated drop-offlane for addedconvenienceUpdatedlandscapingBRAEMAR FIELDSOUTH PARKING LOTNew drive aisle forbetter access tothe parking lotfrom Braemar BlvdNew undergroundstormwater retention system(2 potential locations)Lightingimprovements atpedestrian areasPage 546 of 746 SOUTH RINKWEST RINKEAST RINKUS 169 FRONTAGE ROADBRAEMAR BLVDNNew wheelchair accessibleviewing platforms aroundconcourse perimeterFully accessiblerestrooms for spectatorsNew hand rails onbleachers stairs for safetyBleacher improvements for betteraccessibility and sightlinesBRAEMAR FIELDModernized interior refresh ofexisting upper level spacesConsolidated West &South refrigerationsystem at level belowDemo of old WestRink refrigerationsystem3D SITE VIEW OF PROPOSED CORE CONCEPT - UPPER LEVEL EXISTING FACILITY IMPROVEMENTSPage 547 of 746 NBRAEMAR FIELDSOUTH RINKWEST RINKEAST RINKNew EastRink slabFully accessiblerestroomsUpgraded and consolidatedSouth & West Rinkrefrigeration systems & forincreased reliabilityRefresh of all existing team rooms:Fully accessible locker areas &showers with new equipment andmore durable room finishesUpgraded East & NorthRink refrigeration systemsfor increased reliabilityAll Rinks:New dehumidificationsystems for increasedcomfortability & ice qualityModernized interiorrefresh of existinglower level spaces3D SITE VIEW OF PROPOSED CORE CONCEPT - LOWER LEVEL EXISTING FACILITY IMPROVEMENTSPage 548 of 746 US 169 FRONTAGE ROADBRAEMAR BLVDNTop loaded stadia seating &concourse drink rail seatingViews into rinkfrom lobbyCentral corridorconnecting all four rinksModernizedinterior refresh ofmain lobbyCentralized restroomsBRAEMAR FIELDNEW FOURTHINDOOR RINKTENANTSPACENEW EXPANDEDLOBBY CIRCULATIONImproved lobbyaccess to tenantspacesImproved guestservicesConcourse withstanding railFull indoor enclosure ofexisting "Backyard" RinkConcourse withstanding rail3D SITE VIEW OF PROPOSED CORE CONCEPT - UPPER LEVEL FACILITY EXPANSIONPage 549 of 746 NNEW FOURTHINDOOR RINKBRAEMAR FIELDSingle-user RestroomsTeam Rooms (2)AccessibleRestroomsTeamRooms (2)New ElevatorFull indoor enclosure ofexisting "Backyard" RinkFacilitystorageFacilitystorageResurfacer3D SITE VIEW OF PROPOSED CORE CONCEPT - LOWER LEVEL FACILITY EXPANSIONPage 550 of 746 EXISTING SPACE REMODELMain Lobby• View from lobby into expanded circulationMain Lobby• View from entrance doorsPage 551 of 746 EXISTING SPACE REMODELWest Rink ADA Improvements• New wheelchair viewing platforms• New Aisle RailingsTeam Room Refresh• New paint, benches/hooks, and non-porous flooring.• Accessible restrooms (where applicable)• New Lighting• New HVAC for enhanced air quality• Consistent hot water distributionPage 552 of 746 A | VIEW OF LOBBY EXPANSION FROM EXISTING LOBBYPage 553 of 746 B | VIEW OF FOURTH INDOOR RINK FROM LOBBY EXPANSIONPage 554 of 746 C | VIEW OF NEW FOURTH INDOOR RINK FROM UPPER CONCOURSEPage 555 of 746 D | VIEW OF NEW FOURTH INDOOR RINK FROM ICE LEVELPage 556 of 746 BUDGET SUMMARY$31.7M$45.2M$13.5MInfrastructure RepairsBuilding Expansion & User Experience EnhancementsTotal Project Budget+Ice Quality18%ADA3%Sustainability6%Fourth Rink37%User Experience36%Infrastructure RepairsBuilding Expansion & User Experience EnhancementsPage 557 of 746 POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS - WEST RINK ENTRANCENot in current budget, these items will require additional fundingWest Entrance | 3D Floor Plan & Exterior ViewBenefits:• Improved flow for fans on game day• More visible access to retail spaces• Expanded ADA facility access • Easier site circulationStairsAccessible rampNew west entry &outdoor plazaDivisible tenant space(8,500 total sf)Expanded commonsarea & new eventlobbyArchitecturalscreen wallDirect tenantaccess to exteriorDirect tenantaccess toexpanded lobbyMechanicalcourtyardPotential concessionsrelocation or satelliteexpansionDirect connectionfrom West Rink tonewly expandedevent lobbyPage 558 of 746 POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS - FOURTH INDOOR RINK ENHANCEMENTSCenter-hungscoreboardAdditional bottomloaded stadia seatingAdditionaltechnologyenhancementsMulti-purposeroomNot in current budget, these items will require additional fundingArena Enhancements | Conceptual 3D Floor Plan & Rink Spectator ViewBenefits:• Larger seating capacity• Premier seating options• Immersive fan experience• Improved sightlinesPage 559 of 746 Sustainable Building Policy Discussing waiver from LEED Silver (50 to 59 Points) Challenges •Location and Transportation •Lack of surrounding density and diverse uses nor access to quality transit •Daylighting •Incompatible with athletic use •Existing roof structures won’t support solar or sky lighting •Overall challenges of renovating original ice arena building and additions To Minimum Goal of LEED Certified (40 to 49 Points) Targets •Integrate water efficiency •Enhance commissioning •Enhance refrigeration management •Holistic approach to EV chargers within Braemar Park complex •Optimize energy performance Page 560 of 746 POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS - NEW OUTDOOR RINKWARMING /GATHERINGZAM.REF.OUTDOORGATHERINGREFRIGERATEDRINK UNDERCOVEREDPAVILIONNON-REFRIGERATEDRINK ON NEW SLABLewis Park | Conceptual Site Plan Option24'24'34'24'24'34' 12'DROP OFF LANERELOCATEDHANDICAP STALLS (5)CUT IN NEW DRIVEAISLE ENTRANCEAND ADD CURBISLANDS24'PROVIDE ADAACCESSIBLE ROUTETHROUGH CURBISLAND (TABLE TOP)PROVIDE 12' DROPOFF LANE ACROSSENTIRE FRONTENTRANCECUT IN NEW DRIVEAISLE ENTRANCEAND ADD CURBISLANDSRELOCATEDHANDICAP STALLS (5)COVEREDOUTDOORSTUDIO RINKCOVEREDOUTDOORSTUDIO RINKBraemar | Conceptual Site Plan OptionNot feasible in this location due to underground storm water requirements and loss of parkingNot in current project or budget, these items will require a seperate parallel process and additional fundingPage 561 of 746 NEXT STEPSProject kickoffInitial stakeholder engagementProgramming completedPredesign completedKnutson Construction brought onBuilding assessment performedSchematic scoping & cost estimating✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Design Development & Construction Documentation (Fall 2025 – Summer 2026)Construction (Summer 2026 – Fall 2027)Outdoor Rink conversion (Summer 2026)Peak operational season (November 2026 – March 2027) Minor disruptions expectedEast & West Rink improvements (Summer 2027)Scan here to sign up for additional updates on the Braemar Expansion Project.Page 562 of 746 Braemar Arena Stakeholder Feedback Edina Hockey Association: -High interest in Lewis Park -Wants to be involved in celebrating history + heritage -No issues with naming rights -Liked mezzanine-level multipurpose space in new North rink -Will provide their preferences for tenant space use soon -Interested in a meeting with all stakeholders Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club: -Want a dedicated space with less hockey player traffic -Want an extended warm up space -Want to be involved when it’s time to design their “home.” -Knowing construction timeline and impacts will be critical -Concerned with location of changing rooms -Would like to keep the ballet room for their use -Concerned with size of locker rooms -Fine with sponsors, but would want to know parameters -Want better access to skate sharpening -Like F&B option for tenant space Edina High School: -Would like larger visitor’s locker room (visiting teams currently have to be split into 2 locker rooms) -Would removing showers make room for the larger locker room? showers don’t get used. -Think naming rights is a good idea -No concerns with F&B, including alcohol -If a new West entrance becomes possible, involve EHS in design to make ticketed events feasible Page 563 of 746 Braemar Arena Stakeholder Feedback Breakaway Academy: -No issues with naming rights -Would love training space and multipurpose room in tenant space -Showers needed only for older players -Liked the mezzanine-level multipurpose room in North rink -Their biggest priorities: bathrooms, locker rooms, traffic safety and ice quality General Sports: -Loved idea of a West entrance if it became an option – would create more tenant space visibility -Like second lobby near tenant space -They don’t currently get much store traffic from Braemar -Would like more space than their current lease affords -No issues with naming rights -They would like to be considered an option to manage shooting area if one is built in the tenant space Da Beauty League: -If the West rink could maintain 50% bleacher capacity next summer for DBL games, they can work with that Page 564 of 746 Edina Parks and Recreation Commission Initiative 1.5.1: Review and Comment on Braemar Arena Implementation In support of the Braemar Park master plan implementation efforts for Braemar Arena assign members to the various stakeholder/focus group input opportunities as needs are identified to bring the community perspective to the process. Potential Areas: •Infrastructure replacement •Arena expansion Commission feedback: •Supportive of overall concept for infrastructure investment and expansion. •Supportive of expanded food and beverage, including beer and wine alcohol sales. With standard operational concerns of implementation. •Desired to find a pathway for new western entrance concept and fourth rink enhancements. •Supportive of studying/reviewing Lewis Park as a concept. •Supportive of studying naming rights for this project. Initiative member reviewed October 28, 2025 Full commission reviewed January 13, 2025 Page 565 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.3 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager Item Title: Ordinance 2025-17: Amending Chapter 22 - Miscellaneous Offenses to add Article XI. - Firearms Action Requested: Approve first reading of ordinance 2025-17 amending chapter 22 - MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES to add Article XI. FIREARMS. Information/Background: The Edina City Council is considering a proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance that would amend Chapter 22 of the City Code to create a new article regulating certain firearms and firearm components within the City. The proposed ordinance includes prohibitions related to assault weapons, large-capacity magazines, binary triggers, and ghost guns, as well as requirements intended to prevent negligent firearm storage. City Council held a special town hall meeting on January 6, 2026. Individuals were allowed to provide their feedback on the proposed ordinance and no action was taken at the town hall meeting. Online feedback was open until Sunday, January 11, 2026. Eighty-nine online submissions were received and have been included in the board portal for council review. Resources/Financial Impacts: If the City Council chooses to move forward with adoption or implementation of the ordinance, staff would need to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of potential financial impacts. This could include enforcement considerations, staff capacity, legal review, communication needs, and any ongoing administrative or operational costs associated with implementation. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: The proposed ordinance relates to the City’s broader commitment to public safety, community well- being, and reliable service. It aligns with Council’s role in considering regulatory tools intended to protect residents and respond to emerging community concerns. Input gathered through this process will help inform whether and how the ordinance aligns with City priorities, legal authority, and community expectations before any further Council action is taken. Reliable Service Better Together Page 566 of 746 Values Impact: Engagement The proposed ordinance may generate heightened community interest and dialogue around public safety and individual responsibility. By creating structured opportunities for participation, the City aims to support respectful engagement and provide space for residents with differing perspectives to be heard. Equity Gun violence disproportionately impacts economically disadvantaged communities and communities of color. School shootings are continuing to increase, adding to gun violence as a leading cause of death among children. Health The proposed ordinance is being considered in the context of public health and safety, with a focus on reducing the risk of injury or harm related to firearms. Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. Proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance Feedback Page 567 of 746 Ordinance 2025-17: Amending Chapter 22 - Miscellaneous Offenses to add Article XI. - Firearms The City of Edina Ordains: Section I. Chapter 22 - MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES of the Edina City Code is amended to add the following new Article XI. - FIREARMS: ARTICLE XI. - FIREARMS Sec. 22-314. - Purpose. The City Council finds that there is a public safety and welfare crisis resulting from gun violence in the City. The City finds that semi-automatic military-style assault weapons, ghost guns, large-capacity magazines, and binary triggers have not commonly been used for self-defense purposes, yet these firearms and firearm modifications inherently have a significantly higher capacity for causing damage, injury, and death compared to ordinary firearms used for lawful self-defense purposes. The City finds it necessary for the public safety and welfare to regulate such firearms and firearm modifications to mitigate the damage, injury, and death posed by use of such weapons for non-lawful purposes. Sec. 22-315. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Assault weapon means a semiautomatic military-style assault weapon, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 624.712, subd. 7 and as listed by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 624.712, subd. 8, as may amended from time to time. Binary trigger means a device, mechanism, component, or part designed, marketed, created, or assembled as part of a firearm to discharge one round of ammunition when the trigger is pulled and an additional round of ammunition when the trigger is released. Firearm means a firearm, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 97A.015, subd. 19, as may be amended from time to time, but not including firearms collected as part of the licensed curation of relic firearms/curios per 27 C.F.R. 478. Firearm component means any component or part that is designed, manufactured, created, printed, or assembled to form part of a firearm. Ghost gun means any firearm or firearm component not marked with a serial number required under federal, state, or local law, whether manufactured, assembled, or constructed in whole or in part by any person. Ghost gun does not include any firearms manufactured prior to 1968, antique firearms as defined in Title 18, Section 921(a)(16) of the United States Code, or firearms incapable of discharging a Page 568 of 746 shot by means of an explosive or otherwise incapable of being restored to a firing condition. Large capacity magazine means any ammunition feeding device, whether accessory to a firearm or a firearm component, that has a capacity of more than twenty (20) rounds or is designed, marketed, created, or assembled to have a capacity of more than twenty (20) rounds. A large capacity magazine does not include a tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm or a .22 caliber fixed tubular magazine. Locking device means a firearm component, firearm accessory, or external device or mechanism that renders a firearm inaccessible, inoperable, or both. A locking device includes but is not limited to biometric locks, trigger locks, barrel locks, cylinder locks, gun vaults, locked cabinets, locked boxes, or any other locked container where a key is kept separate from the container and not readily available to an unauthorized person. Person means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity. Unauthorized person means a person who is not the owner of the firearm, does not have permission from the owner of the firearm to possess the firearm, a person under the age of 18 years old, or a person who is otherwise prohibited under federal, state, or local law from possessing the firearm. Sec. 22-316. - Prohibited Acts. a. Possession. No person shall possess an assault weapon, large capacity magazine, binary trigger, or ghost gun within the City. b. Manufacturing. No person shall manufacture, produce, assemble, or construct an assault weapon, large capacity magazine, binary trigger, or ghost gun within the City. c. Sale or transfer. No person shall sell, transfer, or import an assault weapon, large capacity magazine, binary trigger, or ghost gun within the City. d. Negligent storage. No person shall negligently store or leave a loaded or unloaded firearm unattended in a location where the person knows or reasonably should know that an unauthorized person is likely to gain access to the firearm. It shall not constitute negligent storage for a person to take reasonable steps to secure a firearm against unauthorized access with a locking device. Sec. 22-317. - Exceptions. The prohibitions in section 22-316 do not apply in the following circumstances: a. Active or reserve federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement officers, including members of the armed forced of the United States, National Guard, and reserves, where the officer or member is duly authorized to perform a prohibited act within the scope of their official duties; b. Persons transporting a prohibited firearm or firearm component through the City, provided that such firearm or firearm component is unloaded and in a locked container and the transport otherwise complies with all applicable federal, state, and local laws; c. Persons transporting a prohibited firearm or firearm component to a law enforcement agency, military agency, federal firearms licensee, or other entity lawfully permitted to receive such Page 569 of 746 firearms for disposal, sale, resale, or transfer occurring outside of the City and the transport otherwise complies with all applicable federal, state, and local laws; and d. Persons actively using a prohibited firearm or firearm component for lawful self-defense purposes. Sec. 22-318. - Penalties. a. Each day that a violation of section 22-317 continues is a misdemeanor offense subject to imprisonment for not more than 90 days, payment of a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both. b. Nothing in this section shall preclude the City from seeking injunctive or equitable relief in addition to or in lieu of criminal prosecution to prevent or abate violations of this Article. Sec. 22-319. – Effective Dates This Article shall not be effective or enforced until the date the City Council certifies by resolution that this Article is not preempted by state law. Sec. 22-320. - Severability. If any portion of this Article is held invalid, unconstitutional, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be severed and the remaining portions of this Article remain in full force and effect. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication, and passage of a resolution by the City Council certifying that this ordinance is not preempted by state law. First Reading: January 20, 2026 Second Reading: February 3, 2026 Summary for Publication: Ordinance 2025-17 adds firearm regulations to Chapter 22 of the City Code to address public safety concerns. The ordinance prohibits the possession, manufacture, and sale of certain firearms and firearm accessories, including assault weapons, ghost guns, large-capacity magazines, and binary triggers, and requires firearms to be stored to prevent unauthorized access. Exceptions apply for law enforcement, lawful transport, disposal or transfer outside the City, and lawful self-defense. The ordinance will take effect only after the City Council certifies it is not preempted by state law. Page 570 of 746 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 11 January 2026 Ordinance Feedback Better Together Edina Project: Proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance VISITORS 231 CONTRIBUTORS 86 RESPONSES 86 86 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 86 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Page 571 of 746 Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Dec 30, 2025 20:20:42 pm Last Seen:Dec 31, 2025 03:50:03 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the city's effort to reduce gun violence. The second amendment to the constitution allows for a well-regulated militia. Local and state government should have every right to control guns under the US Constitution. In the 18th century without fast modes of transportation and instant communication to call on the military or additional police; a community had to rely on its citizens to have arms to defend the settlement against an insurrection, attack by natives, slave revolts or incursions by colonial or foreign powers. None of that is relevant in the 21st century as communication is instant and police, sheriffs, state patrol and national guard can come to the defense of a community quickly. Outside of firearms designed for hunting, there is no need for firearms by the general public. Firearms are more like to kill or injury a person because of suicide or an accident then to stop a burglar or someone intending harm. When I was a kid my best friend's dad who was a seasoned police officer accidentally shot his self in the leg transferring a gun from his car. Guns are very dangerous. My father stored his hunting rifles in a secret space that was locked and hidden. Gun owners should store their guns in safe places that are locked and in accessible to children, those in heated arguments, those who are suicidal and thieves. For the record, I belonged to my high school rifle club and used the shooting range in the subbasement of the school. Teaching how to safely, treat and use a hunting rifle may be a plus. While I question wither the city has the authority to pass this ordinance per state law, as a matter of principle Edina should pass the ordinance as an example to get the state legislature and Congress to do their jobs. Page 572 of 746 Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 02, 2026 07:38:23 am Last Seen:Jan 02, 2026 15:30:45 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support passage of the resolution because the State or Feds likely will continue to do nothing without concrete evidence that their constituents want them to act. A patchwork of city ordinances can start to provide that evidence and create momentum for more meaningful collective action. Page 573 of 746 Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 02, 2026 07:42:24 am Last Seen:Jan 02, 2026 15:41:19 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Please don't approve an ordinance that cannot be enforced in Edina. WE don't need more legal challenges. Thank you Page 574 of 746 Respondent No:4 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 02, 2026 08:40:18 am Last Seen:Jan 02, 2026 16:36:40 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? It is entirely irresponsible for the city to use taxpayer funding litigating an ordinance that conflicts with state law. Also, my BB gun has over 20 rounds capacity are you going to seize this also? There are so many holes in this draft that the lawyers will have a field day charging our citizens for unwanted litigation expenses. Page 575 of 746 Respondent No:5 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 02, 2026 14:16:43 pm Last Seen:Jan 02, 2026 22:15:34 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? We have to start somewhere! I urge passage of this ordinance. Thank you for allowing the public to have a voice in this matter. Page 576 of 746 Respondent No:6 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 02, 2026 14:52:07 pm Last Seen:Jan 02, 2026 22:43:32 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I 100% agree with the ordinance on gun violence prevention. I know it won’t be enacted unless MN changes it law, but it think it’s imperative that we have language around common sense regulation of assault weapons and high capacity guns in our city. If enough cities approve these ordinances maybe then we can change state law. Page 577 of 746 Respondent No:7 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 03, 2026 18:02:45 pm Last Seen:Jan 04, 2026 01:50:33 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? This is a vast overreach of the city's authority. I do not own any guns currently, but you should not erode my rights as a citizen of Minnesota and the United States. You have many more serious issues to spend your time and the city staff's time on than this. Like reducing the cost of city taxes on citizens to approximate the cost of inflation instead of double digit hikes. You also need to get estimates of project costs to be accurate and hold those responsible for inaccurate estimates to demotions or firing. Make sure that projects are completed on time--The construction at 50th and 100 was to be completed in November. That fact that it won't be completed for 4-5 more months continues to frustrate and inconvenience your citizens. You need to make sure the city runs efficiently, effectively and in a cost efficient manner. That is the priority, not gun control or other projects that are beyond your authority. Page 578 of 746 Respondent No:8 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 04, 2026 07:41:14 am Last Seen:Jan 04, 2026 15:33:55 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I fully support this measure (Firearem Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance). Assault weapons should remain with military and police. Citizens who are hunters, or have other uses for guns do not need assault weapons. Page 579 of 746 Respondent No:9 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 04, 2026 13:40:43 pm Last Seen:Jan 04, 2026 21:30:22 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I’m all for reasonable gun control and safe storage ordinances. What happened at Annunciation should never have happened and should never happen again at any location in the US. Unfortunately, as a nation, we have proven time and again that we care more about the assumed gun rights than we do about human lives. As such, while I agree with everything in the ordinance, I don’t know if I agree that this is the best use of time and resources of the city attorney and the council. The better use of time may be to petition state and federal lawmakers for change. Perhaps educating local gun owners about firearm safety and storage would be a better use of time. Doing the above may result in change now - some of it in our local area. The ordinance, on the other hand, maybe might be useful at some unknown point in the future - if other major changes happen first. Based on historical performance - the other major changes are, unfortunately, not happening. Page 580 of 746 Respondent No:10 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 04, 2026 17:24:27 pm Last Seen:Jan 05, 2026 01:22:41 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I have read the ordinance and I fully support it. It is rational and practical and helps ensure community safety. I am proud Edina would take such steps!!! Page 581 of 746 Respondent No:11 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 04, 2026 17:29:51 pm Last Seen:Jan 05, 2026 01:22:19 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? This memo provides an analysis of Ordinance 2025 17, which proposes new restrictions on the possession, manufacture, sale, and storage of certain firearms and firearm components within the City of Edina. The goal is to highlight key legal, operational, and policy considerations that may not be fully addressed in the ordinance’s summary or staff report. ________________________________________ 1. State Preemption and Legal Authority A. Minnesota’s Uniform Firearms Framework Minnesota maintains statewide firearms regulations to ensure consistency across jurisdictions. Courts have repeatedly emphasized the importance of avoiding a patchwork of local rules that create confusion for residents, visitors, and law enforcement. B. Ordinance Acknowledges Preemption Risk The ordinance explicitly states it cannot take effect until the Council certifies that it is “not preempted by state law.” This is an unusual provision that signals significant legal uncertainty. C. Litigation Exposure If enacted, the ordinance is likely to face immediate legal challenge. Litigation would require substantial staff time and financial resources, with uncertain outcomes. Several municipalities nationwide have incurred significant costs defending similar ordinances. ________________________________________ 2. Overbreadth of Definitions and Scope A. Broad Definitions Capture Common Items The ordinance’s definitions of “assault weapon,” “ghost gun,” “firearm component,” and “large capacity magazine” extend beyond weapons typically associated with criminal misuse. • The 20 round magazine threshold is stricter than many state and federal proposals. • “Firearm component” could include parts used by hobbyists, competitive shooters, and gunsmiths. B. Impact on Lawful Owners The ordinance prohibits possession even inside private homes, regardless of intent or behavior. This raises concerns about overreach into personal property and lawful recreational activities. ________________________________________ 3. Criminalizing Possession Rather Than Misuse A. Focus on Ownership, Not Conduct The ordinance criminalizes possession of certain items without regard to criminal history, intent, or misuse. • Individuals who have never committed a crime could face misdemeanor charges solely for owning items legal under state and federal law. • Individuals intending to commit crimes are unlikely to comply with the ordinance. B. Potential for Disproportionate Impact Enforcement may fall unevenly across neighborhoods or demographic groups, raising equity concerns. ________________________________________ 4. Second Amendment Considerations A. Supreme Court Guidance The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Second Amendment protects firearms “in common use” for lawful purposes, including self-defense in the home. B. Items Covered by the Ordinance Many of the items prohibited—such as standard capacity magazines and commonly owned semiautomatic firearms—are widely possessed nationwide for lawful activities. C. Likelihood of Constitutional Challenge A municipal ban on possession inside the home raises substantial constitutional questions. Similar ordinances in other jurisdictions have resulted in lengthy and expensive litigation, often with mixed or unfavorable outcomes for cities. ________________________________________ 5. Enforcement and Operational Challenges A. Enforcement Inside Private Homes Regulating possession within private residences raises privacy concerns and may require complaint driven investigations or search warrants. B. Resource Allocation Enforcement would divert police resources from violent crime, property crime, and community policing initiatives. C. Practical Limitations The ordinance may be difficult to enforce consistently, potentially undermining public confidence in the City’s regulatory approach. ________________________________________ 6. Economic and Community Impacts A. Impact on Local Businesses Retailers, gunsmiths, and sporting goods stores may lose business to neighboring cities. • Residents will likely purchase items elsewhere, shifting economic activity out of Edina without reducing ownership. B. Impact on Hobbyists and Competitive Shooters The ordinance prohibits manufacturing, assembling, or constructing certain firearms or components—even for personal use—affecting: • Competitive shooters • Collectors • Gunsmiths • Hobbyists ________________________________________ 7. Negligent Storage Provision A. Subjective Standard The “reasonably should know” standard is vague and may be inconsistently applied. B. Risk of Criminalizing Responsible Owners Residents may face penalties even when no harm occurs and even when they believe they have taken reasonable precautions. C. Alternative Approaches Voluntary safe storage education programs and partnerships with community organizations may achieve better outcomes without criminal penalties. ________________________________________ 8. Redundancy With Existing State and Federal Laws A. Existing Regulatory Framework Federal and state laws already regulate: • Serial numbers • Transfers and background checks • Prohibited persons • Certain firearm types B. Limited Added Value Duplicating these laws at the city level may not meaningfully reduce crime or address root causes such as illegal trafficking, Page 582 of 746 mental health crises, or socioeconomic factors. ________________________________________ 9. Community Cohesion and Public Trust A. Risk of Polarization Firearms policy is deeply personal for many residents. Sweeping bans without broad consensus may divide the community. B. Alternative Strategies Residents may support approaches that focus on: • Education • Safe storage outreach • Mental health support • Community based violence prevention programs These strategies may offer more effective and unifying solutions. ________________________________________ Conclusion Ordinance 2025 17 raises significant legal, operational, constitutional, and community impact concerns. While public safety is a shared priority, the ordinance’s broad scope, uncertain legal footing, and enforcement challenges suggest that alternative approaches may better serve Edina’s residents. A more targeted, evidence-based strategy—focused on education, safe storage initiatives, and community-based prevention—may achieve greater public safety benefits without exposing the City to legal risk or community division. Page 583 of 746 Respondent No:12 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 04, 2026 18:09:53 pm Last Seen:Jan 05, 2026 02:00:53 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Thank you for proposing this ordinance - I think that it is an excellent idea. I believe there is no reason anyone needs to own the items covered in the ordinance. I support any laws that will ban these items and laws that require safe storage of all firearms. Page 584 of 746 Respondent No:13 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 05, 2026 12:24:14 pm Last Seen:Jan 05, 2026 20:12:12 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Thank you City Council for considering putting in writing the first steps toward establishing reasonable and better gun control within the state of MN and our municipality. I certainly would like to see better laws regarding gun safety and registration. Outlawing military grade weapons and extended magazines, as well as unregistered guns, within the boundaries of the municipality is reasonable and I don't believe unduly harsh or unreasonable for anyone who is a sport hunter or gun enthusiast. I disagree with section 22-317d which allow an individual within city limits to use an automatic weapon for self defense. That essentially negates any restriction on the possession of automatic weapons within city limits. An individual could certainly "store" an automatic weapon for a friend who lives outside the boundaries of Edina. When would a resident need an automatic weapon for self defense? I don't see Edina being an epicenter of revolt or tyranny. Armageddon is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future. Page 585 of 746 Respondent No:14 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 05, 2026 13:25:40 pm Last Seen:Jan 05, 2026 21:25:14 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Testimony of Pastor Jeff Sartain Edina City Council – Community Feedback on Gun Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council, Thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight. My name is Jeff Sartain, and I am a pastor serving here in Edina. I am here as a faith leader, but more importantly, as a neighbor and as someone who walks closely with families carrying real and ongoing trauma. This past fall, I witnessed the horror of the shooting at Annunciation Church and School in Minneapolis. Three children from my congregation were inside the sanctuary at the time. The pain did not end when the headlines moved on. The fear, grief, and disruption to a sense of safety remain with these families every day. It matters deeply that our community makes clear to them—and to all families—that this pain is seen, honored, and taken seriously. These are not “someone else’s children.” They are our children. And when one member of the community suffers, the whole community is diminished. I want to be clear about something else as well. I grew up in northern Minnesota, in a home with guns. Nearly every household around us did. But what we also had—universally—was gun safety training, secure storage, and a deeply ingrained respect for the power and purpose of a firearm. That culture emphasized responsibility, not casual access. It emphasized care for one another. We no longer live in that same context. Firearms today are more lethal, more accessible, and more likely to be stored or modified in ways that increase risk— especially to children and others who should never encounter them. Our shared responsibility has to rise to meet that reality. The draft ordinance before you does not criminalize responsible ownership. It does not target lawful self-defense. What it does is take seriously the proven dangers of unsecured firearms, high-capacity weapons, and modifications that dramatically increase harm. It names negligent storage for what it is: a public safety risk. And it affirms that community safety and individual rights are not opposites—they depend on one another. As a pastor, I spend my days with people in moments of deep vulnerability. I can tell you with absolute certainty: the consequences of gun violence ripple far beyond the moment of impact. They reshape childhoods. They fracture trust. They leave lasting wounds in bodies, families, and communities. Adopting strong, thoughtful gun safety and safe storage policies is not about fear. It is about care. It is about love of neighbor. It is about choosing to prevent harm when prevention is within our reach. I urge the City Council to move forward with this ordinance and to do so with moral clarity and courage. Our children—and all who call Edina home—deserve nothing less. Thank you for your time and for your commitment to the safety and wellbeing of our community. Page 586 of 746 Respondent No:15 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 05, 2026 18:26:04 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 02:06:23 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Ignoring the issues of pre-emption, this ordinance would create criminals out of current law-abiding, tax-paying, and contributing members of the Edina community. This is a poor use of time, and possible future enforcement effort, as well as being blatantly unconstitutional at the state and federal level. There will be no measurable safety benefits. Minnesota ALREADY has some of the most severe and arcane firearms purchase laws in the nation, requiring possession of a permit to carry and/or permit to purchase to simply buy a pistol or "assault weapon" (as defined by the state). The permit requires a background check and a course (an investment in time and money). On top of that, purchasing these requires a background check at time of purchase. A prohibited person purchasing firearms is already a felony. Breaking the law (at the state and federal level) is already illegal. There is no foreseeable reasonable enforcement of this law other than to add-on to existing criminal prosecution after-the-fact, or to target those who the current Edina city council and enforcement apparatus would like to target, harass, or intimidate. Application of these laws would only be in the aftermath of other criminal activity, and as a result will have zero effect on reducing crime. Criminals, by their nature, are not concerned with breaking law. Do we have statistics on how many violent crimes are committed in Edina, by city residents who could potentially fall under the jurisdiction of these regulations? The author of this ordinance surely can provide the data that was used to inform these decisions, and the terms and their definitions. Ignoring the issue of pre-emption and choosing to restrict the city's residents' inalienable rights under the 2nd amendment is just as egregious as choosing a more restrictive standard on the 1st amendment inside the city, or placing restrictions on who is enfranchised to vote in a way more restrictive than the state or federal government defines. This idea is misguided security theater, and the idea that the city is taking the time to entertain this on-face unconstitutional document, is disturbing. Page 587 of 746 Respondent No:16 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 05, 2026 19:37:29 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 03:29:45 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I would like them to consider how important it is to keep our community safe. How important is is to keep our children safe. What happened at Annunciation School could have been one of our schools. Safe Storage is important and can easily be taught and implemented and it will SAVE LIVES. Please do the right thing and consider these ways to help our community. Thank you. Page 588 of 746 Respondent No:17 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 05, 2026 20:09:20 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 03:58:45 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Thank you for this proposal. It’s more than thoughts and prayers. Thank you for proposing meaningful legislation to keep our community safe from gun violence. Page 589 of 746 Respondent No:18 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 05, 2026 21:01:31 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 04:09:36 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Hi, I am Michelle Eul from 4005 Lynn Ave. I am an engineer, a mother, and a voter in every election. I have a daughter in 1st grade, a son in pre-school, and a 2-year-old son. My kids asked about the blue and green ribbons on trees around the community. How would you explain a school shooting to a 5-year-old? Should I tell my kids they are safe at school? What about at sporting events or parks? My son did his first lock-down drill when he was three. Three. Is that okay? And we are the lucky ones. What would you do if you got the call that your school had an active shooter? What would happen if your child never came to the “re-union zone”? I am in tears just thinking of this. And I know there is a better way. We lived in Europe for 4 years. There was almost no gun violence. I lost sleep for months wondering if it was a responsible parenting decision to move back to the US. What is more important - protecting my kids from gun violence or seeing grandparents? I still don’t know if I made the right choice. With that in mind, I fully support the proposed Firearm Safety and Storage Ordinance. Please pass this ordinance, and then advocate for additional measures like the lifting of the State’s “pre-emption” law and asking State and National leaders to implement a public health approach to gun safety. This approach would treat gun deaths as a preventable health problem, and it was recommended by an academic paper that I read. Thank you for proposing this ordinance and reviewing public comments. Page 590 of 746 Respondent No:19 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 01:47:53 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 09:46:11 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the ordinance. Page 591 of 746 Respondent No:20 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 03:43:41 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 11:42:43 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support this ordinance. Page 592 of 746 Respondent No:21 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 04:34:15 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 12:33:33 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I strongly support this ordinance. Please consider making this community safer. This is one step in the right direction. Page 593 of 746 Respondent No:22 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 05:53:57 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 13:53:21 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Thank you for this. I support and appreciate the ordinance. Page 594 of 746 Respondent No:23 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 07:01:28 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 15:01:00 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am pro this ordinance. Page 595 of 746 Respondent No:24 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 07:54:25 am Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 19:28:14 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Thank you so much for holding this very important special meeting. I am a mother of a 2 and 5 year old. My biggest fear is them being affected by gun violence. The Annunciation tragedy made this fear even more real. Please, please, please pass this ordinance. There is no reason any civilian needs assault weapons, large-capacity magazines, binary triggers or ghost guns. Establishing requirements to prevent negligent firearm storage is just common sense. Together we can prevent tragedies like the Annunciation shooting and many others. Our Edina City Council can make an incredible Impact toward building back trust and safety in our local community. Please consider this and help protect our children. Thank you for your consideration and service. Page 596 of 746 Respondent No:25 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 08:28:37 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 16:20:31 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Please pass this important ordinance to keep our community safe. Gun violence is the leading cause of death for children and teens in the United States, and now is the time to do something about it. The Constitution makes it clear that guns can and should be regulated. Responsible gun owners and parents all agree-- assault weapons bans make us all safer. No one needs an assault weapon, but our children deserve to live, play, learn, and grow without fearing for their lives. Thank you, City Council! Page 597 of 746 Respondent No:26 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 08:42:10 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 16:41:17 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am strongly in favor of the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance. Page 598 of 746 Respondent No:27 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 08:48:25 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 16:24:42 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am a mother and a registered gun owner. I understand people are worried for children's safety, but these restrictions have proved over and over again in other cities (Chicago for example)that it doesnt matter what ordinance or laws are passed. If people want to get ahold of these things to do harm, they find ways to get ahold of them. Laws dont deter criminals, it is a way to continue to put a noose around law abiding citizens. Using our dollars in an overly swelled taxed out city, blown budgets, and resisting any input from residents, to use on any law suits that will come from this, or to push this idea is beyond comprehension. This needs to come federally if that is the case, using your own money on your own agenda to properly pass this to residents. This is not a city issue and using our money to carry forward when it has been advised by counsel to not touch the subject is reckless use of resources! It should be treated as such, and all of you who are pushing this matter should be removed from office. It is not your money to play with, you represent US, the residents of this city you are trying to tax out to provide a "safe haven for everyone". This is your agenda, so use your own money to try and push this. We dont need any more city intervention with this issue. If you want this passed, push it through the appropriate channels. We will consider a lawsuit with the city of Edina if this is carried out. We are tired of being over taxed, over TIFed and over populated. Edina used to be a sought after city, you have created a suburb of Minneapolis that is crammed full, and pushing the long standing residents out with such. Please stop with this nonsense. Hear out residents, but also heed the legal advice of your counsel to not continue with this ordinance. Page 599 of 746 Respondent No:28 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 08:53:55 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 16:52:03 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the proposed Firearm and Safe Storage ordinance Page 600 of 746 Respondent No:29 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 10:10:52 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 17:46:44 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? This 83 year old resident very much appreciates you considering Edina adopting more restrictive gun laws. I followed the St. Paul project and very much approved. I have two small dogs who need to go for a short walk before bed and value any legislation that helps keep me safe. Especially with the VERY LARGE susbsidized housing project going up on 78th Street. Bloomington would not approve it - except if it would be built on the small strip of land that belong to them even though it is on the north side of Hwy 494.. I am now looking at a hand gun for self protection and will be more than willing to abide by any laws Edina implements to keep me safe. Page 601 of 746 Respondent No:30 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 10:54:39 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 18:47:38 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I fully support the Firearms Safety and Safe Ordinance for Edina. Even if this cannot be implemented soon due to state law limitations, I feel it sends the message gun lethality and supports safety. While not a popular aspect, the instigator with the gun is also at risk and many times has an active mental health crisis. We must DO MORE. This is a good start. Page 602 of 746 Respondent No:31 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 11:12:57 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 19:10:50 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am in full support of this ordinance and for the City of Edina to pressure state legislators to remove the preemptive clause. Anything that can make our city safer and make it harder for anyone to acquire an assault rifle or other devices not designed for hunting is a good thing. Page 603 of 746 Respondent No:32 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 11:14:23 am Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 19:05:41 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the ordinance. There should be common sense firearm safety laws in every community. Our own family experienced the terror of automatic firearm use when our daughter was in hiding for four hours at Michigan State University after a gunman killed three people and wounded others on campus. He was not apprehended for that amount of time. We had to go through that with her over the phone. The amount of damage he caused in seconds is now something the students and staff have to live with for the rest of their lives. Please say yes to the Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance. Our community deserves to have every chance to stay safe. Page 604 of 746 Respondent No:33 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 12:44:17 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 20:38:35 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? The hunters in my family are in favor of these kinds of reasonable regulations in the interest of public safety, and are appalled that some gun owners do not, on their own, follow best practices for keeping their loved ones and neighbors safe. It's smart to wait until the regulations are no longer pre-empted by the state. I fully support the proposed firearm safety and safe storage ordinance. Page 605 of 746 Respondent No:34 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 13:37:15 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 21:28:43 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? We support the proposed firearm safety and safe storage ordinance. We have been Edina residents since 1965, graduated from EHS in 1971 and kids from EHS in 2001, 2003. Frank and Carol Sidell Page 606 of 746 Respondent No:35 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 14:11:12 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 21:51:59 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I write in favor of Draft Ordinance No. 2025-17. There is no reasonable civilian purpose whatsoever for owning any of the weapons or accessories named in this draft ordinance. These are weapons of war and have no business in the hands of civilians. The notion that semi-automatic weapons, high-capacity magazines or the like are necessary for "self-defense" is nonsensical. In fact, the opposite it true; people who own or carry guns are far more likely to be the victim of gun violence (see: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272723000567). America is unique among developed nations in our obscene instance of school shootings and in gun deaths more broadly. The reason is the prevalence of and easy access to guns, period. We cannot ban guns outright, but we should - and must - take reasonable measures to restrict access to weapons designed solely for killing human beings. Draft Ordinance No. 2025-17 is a sensible step in this direction. The Edina City Council should pass it. Yours sincerely, Tony Graham Edina, MN Page 607 of 746 Respondent No:36 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 14:25:25 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 22:13:57 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? It has become a terrible reality that whenever I take my kids to events, in Edina or surrounding communities, I am constantly scanning the environment, thinking where we would we run if someone started shooting, how I could I protect me kids, where could we hide in the event of an active shooter? This is not normal, and this is not a world that children should live in. But it it isn’t a foregone conclusion, we don’t have to live in fear of mass shooting events if citizens and our civic leaders take action, prioritize safety over profit or lobbying, and have the courage and common sense to pass this ordinance. This isn’t disease or natural disaster, mass casualty fun events CAN be stopped if citizens and leaders stand up and say, no more. Assault weapons and high capacity magazines have no place in our city and in our neighborhoods. Please show courage and common sense and pass this ordinance today. Thank you! Page 608 of 746 Respondent No:37 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 14:31:05 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 22:24:51 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? The second amendment of the Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I believe this ordinance falls well within the limits of "well regulated", but not enforce these rules on any militia. I would therefore like this ordinance to apply as well to the Edina police force, and any private or public "militias" that reside in our city. I would feel much safer here if our police didn't also have the means for mass-murder. Thanks for taking comments! Page 609 of 746 Respondent No:38 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 15:24:22 pm Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 15:21:10 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am an Edina resident and EPS parent and am writing to urge the council to vote to approve the ordinance to regulate certain types of firearms and firearm components. Assault style firearms are the preferred weapon of mass shooters and have the capacity to kill and maim far more people in a short amount of time than lower capacity, lower velocity firearms. While a federal and state level ban would be more effective, we as a city should lead the way by implementing a ban, should preemption be lifted, as a step towards creating a safer community and as an example for other communities to follow. I support responsible gun ownership, but there is no constitutional right to assault weapons and no need for them in society. Research shows that if congress had upheld the federal ban between 2005 and 2019, they could have prevented more than 30 mass shootings. This is a broadly supported measure in our community. As an EPS parent, I have had countless conversations with other parents about our fears for our children and the need for an assault weapons ban to help mitigate risks. Expanding and clarifying safe storage requirements will save lives from multiple sources of gun violence: unintentional shootings, crime-related gun violence (facilitated by stolen guns), suicide, school and other mass shootings. It will send a clear message to irresponsible gun owners: lock up your firearms when they are not in your immediate control or be held accountable. Every day, eight children are unintentionally shot or killed by a gun. Securely stored firearms—whether loaded or not—would prevent most of these tragedies. It is simple; safe storage laws work and save lives, and they do not infringe on the rights of individuals to own a firearm. Studies have repeatedly shown that safe storage results in a reduction in the rates of self-inflicted and unintentional firearm injuries among children and teenagers by up to 85%. Kids are curious and are developmentally prone to be risk-takers. As adults, we should be responsible for preventing unsupervised access to deadly weapons. Lax storage of firearms contributes to many forms of gun violence. More than 80% of child firearm suicides use a gun belonging to a family member. In 75% of cases, guns used in school shootings came from the shooter’s home or that of a relative. Edina has led the way in so many other initiatives and as a community that values children and safety, it is imperative that this council approve the ordinance and encourage the state legislature to lift preemption, allowing it to pass. Page 610 of 746 Respondent No:39 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 15:59:13 pm Last Seen:Jan 06, 2026 23:40:35 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I believe this is a sensible approach to try to attempt to reduce the kinds of guns that are not designed for hunting or self protection. I think it’s important for the City to be proactive in passing an ordinance in case the state should lift its statute. Access to these destructive weapons have been too easy and accessible particularly to individuals who are experiencing mental health issues. There is no reason for any person, unless working with a law enforcement or military agency to be possession of these weapons. This ordinance does not deny a person access to all guns, just the ones that are typically associated with warfare. I’m in full support of a ban on all ghost weapons and those produced on 3 D printers. The sheer number of guns available to Americans is staggering and my hope is that an ordinance like this and others are passed throughout the nation in hopes of reducing the numbers and access to weapons that were never designed for use by nonmilitary individuals. Finally safe storage and gun locks should be the norm and is just common sense. Reducing the number of tragic accidents in homes by children who have found an unlocked weapon is absolutely preventable. Those who cannot abide by this common sense law should be held accountable. Page 611 of 746 Respondent No:40 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 16:33:26 pm Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 00:30:23 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? My name is Andrea Deanovic Schmidt and I live in the Countryside neighborhood with my husband and two kids -- ages 9 and 6. When my family attends church in this city or when I drop my kids off at their activities, when we shop or go to a movie at Southdale, I shouldn't have to worry about the easy access to assault weapons. Assault-style weapons don't belong in our neighborhoods or near our schools. This ordinance is a reasonable first step to protect families like mine. I urge you to vote yes. Page 612 of 746 Respondent No:41 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 18:14:30 pm Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 01:31:32 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? While we all are supportive of a safe Edina, this ordinance does nothing address the true issue which is mental health. It’s blaming an object and not getting to the root cause. It will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals or prevent criminals from coming into Edina to commit a crime. However it will automatically make responsible law abiding Edina residents who are gun owners criminals for following federal and state law. To that end, what’s not being addressed is how this ordinance, if adopted, would be enforced as it has the potential to violate other civil rights and open the city to further legal action. This will ultimately be a costly ordinance that has no material impact on crime opening the city to a mountain of litigation. The cost of which should not be passed on to the tax payer. While this is an emotional issue the council should align to federal / state law and focus their efforts and resources in areas of mental health and education that can make a more substantial impact. I respectfully request the this ordinance not be adopted Page 613 of 746 Respondent No:42 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 06, 2026 19:17:05 pm Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 03:11:12 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I want the City of Edina to enforce an ordinace for semi-automatic military-style assault weapons, ghost guns, large-capacity magazines, and binary triggers. These type of firearms and firearm modifications inherently have a significantly higher capacity for causing damage, injury, and death compared to ordinary firearms. This would be for the public safety and welfare to mitigate the damage, injury, and death posed by use of such weapons. Page 614 of 746 Respondent No:43 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 04:47:02 am Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 12:40:06 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? We are gun owners for hunting purposes. As gun owners our family fully supports this ordinance. We have been Edina residents for over 20 years. Please don’t be dissuaded by a very small, but vocal group opposing this ordinance. This is the very least we can do to protect our community and I am proud of our city council for taking up the issue. Page 615 of 746 Respondent No:44 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 09:03:05 am Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 14:54:40 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Can you guarantee me that criminals will not bring the proposed banned firearms into EDINA? Because when my storage locker was cut into and tens of thousands worth of my property was stolen by insider employee the city was not there to protect me. When my current home that has a fake mortgage on it, so some MN DHS licensed adult daycare provider can use it for Medicaid fraud ...the city and Keith Ellison were not there to protect me or my home. so now you want to limit my guns. Why should i trust you? I can't. Mary Moriarty repeatedly let repeat felons back on the street to commit gun crimes many of which were prohibited from owning a gun...yet we had repeat shootings from the same felons. Felons that used "Glock switches" either 3d printed or from China that convert their guns into machine guns....... all the automatic fire in Hennepin county has been almost exclusively committed by repeat felons using converted machine guns. Mary just let them back on the street. Do you think they care about Edina gun laws? "oh, sorry I'm a 3x felon with a converted machined gun i made with a 3d printed Glock switch but i can't take that into Edina because they don't allow it?" c'mon get real ...the situation & gun crime only improved when the US atty Luger got involved and charged the repeat felons with Federal charges and took them off the streets. The fact of the matter is that criminals don't care about gun laws & this proposal will only take guns away from guys like me. I have never had a speeding ticket let alone a felony but yes i own an ar15 locked in my safe for a rainy day that i hope will never come. But if that day comes at least i know i have a chance to protect my family with the same type of weapon that the felon criminals are sure to have.... there are 400m guns in the USA. High-capacity magazines can be printed on 3d printers as can "Glock switches". Respectfully this is a federal issue. Criminals will always have guns & you can't trust Mary Moriarty to take them off the streets. So, what is the solution? Better screening? what were the issues of the obviously deranged annunciation shooter? mental health? drugs or medication? I'm not sure what the issue is but I would like to think there was a way to better identify this person before having access to firearms.... if anything we need better screening. Crazy's will always find a way to attack the vulnerable...what if he had thrown Molotov cocktails through the glass? casualties would have been much higher? so are we going to ban gasoline in Edina now too then? A 4min response time is less than ideal due to low mpls police numbers. I would like to think 2 min is more of Edina response time but that's an eternity if you don't have the ability to defend yourself. I was at Nordstroms on Xmas eve a few years back when a murder occurred we ended up running into Nespresso and locked in for an hour feeling helpless. But wait that's a NO GUN ZONE but yet some clown who's been in trouble with the law many times brought a gun in and killed someone yards from me. Edina gun laws won't change anything you need to take the criminals off the street & jail them. Period end of story. This is a federal Issue and the fact that we are spending time talking about this at the local level is a little silly & just an affirmation to push a progressive political agenda in my opinion. Are you going to grandfather in existing collections? compensate owners many of whom have collections worth six figures? set aside my precious local tax dollars to defend the numerous legal challenges that will certainly be filed? This is silly. Finally, i would encourage you to watch the 9min Bondi beach video of the shooters taking pot shots in Zero-gun tolerance Australia. 9min of horror because people, bystanders & local homeowners didn't have the ability to defend themselves and fight back unlike the USA where a "good guy" with a gun could offer some defense...how could this happen guns are banned in Australia yet here we go again. get real Helpless Edina now becomes a target for the criminals. if you take guns away. Just take a look at home invasions % in the GUN banned UK vs USA. Pretty easy to break into an elderly persons home and steal what you want when you don't fear a response. It doesn't happen nearly as much in the USA for just that reason and now you want to take my ability to defend myself away to push a progressive agenda. Respectfully, I don't think so. Never had even a speeding ticket but I guess I be a first time felon then & alive. Congratulations. 58yrs old get up grind every day to pay my property taxes that go up perennially 8% every year, pay my $1200 car tabs per car thanks to a state the has ineptly squandered a surplus much through mismanagement of spending & Fraud. Don't you think EDINA has a lot more pressing local issues like insane property taxes forcing retires on fixed income out of their homes. Endless construction on France Ave, and apparently a bridge to no where on 50th & Vernon? schools? I can't support and will vote against any council member or mayor who supports this agenda. Thanks for your time 24yr resident pamela park Page 616 of 746 Respondent No:45 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 09:31:37 am Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 17:08:21 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? The August mass shooting at Annunciation Church was caused by a person with MENTAL ILLNESS, not due to a ghost gun, binary trigger, or a large capacity magazine. If a deranged person is intent on killing people, they will find a way. A gun ordinance will not stop a deranged person. Page 617 of 746 Respondent No:46 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 13:44:03 pm Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 20:10:38 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am an Edina resident and aunt of Fletcher Merkel (age 8), who was killed at Annunciation, and I support this ordinance. Today, January 7, is Fletcher's birthday. Because of gun violence, Fletcher is not here to celebrate with us. Because of gun violence, Fletcher is not here to blow out the candles on his cake. Because of gun violence, Fletcher is not here to make a wish for his future. Help prevent gun violence from killing one more person — it could be someone you love. Please pass this ordinance. Page 618 of 746 Respondent No:47 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 15:10:46 pm Last Seen:Jan 07, 2026 23:08:58 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council, We are writing in strong support of Draft Ordinance No. 2025-17 and to thank you for bringing it forward for consideration. Like many people, we have been deeply affected by the August shooting at Annunciation School, where two children were killed and dozens more — most of them students — were injured. We must do more to prevent these tragedies, and this ordinance is a meaningful step. We find this ordinance to be thoughtful, targeted, and grounded in public safety. It focuses on assault weapons, ghost guns, large-capacity magazines, and binary triggers — items that are not commonly used for lawful self-defense, yet dramatically increase the capacity for mass injury and death. By addressing possession, manufacture, sale, and negligent storage, the ordinance prioritizes prevention while respecting lawful use and clearly defined exceptions. At a time when many people feel that nothing ever changes after mass shootings, this ordinance represents a concrete, measured step toward reducing risk in our community. Even if it cannot prevent every act of violence, it signals that Edina is willing to use the tools available to it to prioritize public safety — especially for children. Thank you for your leadership and for taking this issue seriously. We strongly urge you to adopt Draft Ordinance No. 2025-17. Sincerely, Kathy Christensen and Mark Burke Page 619 of 746 Respondent No:48 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 20:07:36 pm Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 03:40:54 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I oppose this ordinance. Existing gun laws address criminal use of guns. This ordinance is simply a superfluous attempt to take legal firearms, possessed legally, from people who've only used them legally. The City admits it has no effect. Stop wasting time. My more serious point is, the city cannot protect its residents, as we all have seen since 2020. We all know that if there's civil unrest, we're on our own. The City does not have the resources, and in the current state leadership will not mobilize necessary resources in time. We also know that current City, County and State leadership sympathizes with large- scale left-wing rioters and will use inflammatory rhetoric to escalate riots and violence against law enforcement. We all see that again today with the ICE officer-involved shooting. In that context, depriving citizens of the simple, relatively inexpensive means of self-defense just looks like you support mob rule and rioters. You're banning the exact firearms our veterans are familiar with from military service, the same firearms our police and law enforcement use to protect themselves, their colleagues, and the public. My neighborhood was, like many others, full of violent tags in 2020. Target, Whole Foods and many other Edina business installed boards, bollards, plywood and other defensive measures against mass destruction. I don't like that I'll have to board my house if a mob decides it wants to riot. I can't stop a mob without a firearm. I am defenseless, so are you, so is everyone else in Edina. When mobs riot again, you should not be the obstacle to Edina residents defending themselves. It bothers me that I have to say this. We chose Edina in part because of the small-town levels of safety. That doesn't exist anymore, thanks to your deliberate efforts to demonize law enforcement. Outlawing legal means of self-defense looks like more support of lawless mobs. Please drop this foolish campaign, and instead enforce current laws, and support leaders and prosecutors who aggressively enforce laws. Page 620 of 746 Respondent No:49 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 07, 2026 21:46:34 pm Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 05:16:50 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I own a condominium in Edina and am not in a position to relocate without incurring significant financial hardship. Under the proposed ordinance, I would become a criminal solely due to a change in law, despite having committed no wrongdoing. I own a firearm for lawful purposes, including hunting and recreational target shooting. My ownership of this rifle does not place others at increased risk. Nevertheless, out of fear of hypothetical future misuse, a ban is now being considered. I did not expect that choosing to live in what I believed to be a safe and welcoming community would result in being targeted by my own government, one I actively support and vote for. Public policy should distinguish between responsible citizens and those who commit crimes. Just as one would not discard an entire container of blueberries because a single berry is spoiled, we should not criminalize law-abiding individuals because of the actions of a few. Our legal system is founded on accountability for actual wrongdoing, not on punishing individuals for crimes they have not committed. This principle is fundamental to why we guarantee due process and the right to a trial by a jury of one’s peers. I strongly believe that responsible firearm owners should not be criminalized for lawful behavior. Instead, efforts should focus on increasing penalties for those who commit violent acts and enforcing existing laws. Creating new offenses for lawful conduct risks unintended consequences and does not address the root causes of violence. Finally, it is important to note that none of the proposed ordinances would have prevented the Annunciation shooting. Laws enacted in response to tragedy, while understandable, can be short-sighted if they do not effectively improve public safety. I respectfully urge you to follow existing state and federal law and to refrain from passing these ordinances. Page 621 of 746 Respondent No:50 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 03:37:04 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 11:36:00 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am strongly in support of the updated Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance. Page 622 of 746 Respondent No:51 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 06:16:33 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 14:13:46 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Thank you for pursuing sensible firearms safety rules in Edina. In the same way that Edina took the lead on raising the age of legal tobacco purchase, our city can set an example for other municipalities seeking to address the urgent public health problem of gun violence. Doing so will give state representatives political cover to make the changes needed so that city gun ordinances become enforceable. Although I don't expect edits at this stage in the process given the legally conservative position the city must strike, I hope that at some point you remove the exemption for "Persons actively using a prohibited firearm or firearm component for lawful self-defense purposes." Assault-style firearms are designed to slaughter multiple people and have no justification beyond authorized military use. Gun rights are not a binary issue; common sense safety measures must be added and enforced. Page 623 of 746 Respondent No:52 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 07:27:26 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 14:49:39 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the proposed ordinance as written and encourage the members of City Council to adopt it. The City needs to fill a gap in the existing gun control laws to attempt to reduce the risk of gun violence towards residents of the City. Page 624 of 746 Respondent No:53 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 08:32:16 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 16:28:43 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Re: Proposed Edina Gun Legislation Greetings & Salutations, The following is respectful input regarding Edina pending gun control legislation. Item A - Nightline Deadly Business (Ted Koppel) In August 2003, Nightline’s Ted Koppel aired one of his most dynamic programs entitled, “Deadly Business”. The program focused on the world’s global gun trade. My takeaway from the program suggests the following. “Liken the global, thus America’s, gun trade to an iceberg, 20% (legal) above water and 80% (illegal) below water.”. So enthralled with the broadcast, I ordered and still have in archive, the program transcript. If interested, I would be happy to forward the .pdf file to the committee. Item B - Alcohol Prohibition Lessons Learned Keeping with the legal versus illegal discussion, the harsh lesson learned from alcohol prohibition via the 18th Amendment (circa 1919) was a result which made criminals of law abiding citizens and planted the seeds of a massive criminal underworld which cost the lives of thousands even past the amendment’s repeal (circa 1933). Item C - Thinking Outside the Box If the objective of Edina is to maintain the status quo of running in neutral, as in truly accomplish nothing but ineffective legislative paperwork, by all means, continue the path of generating “feel good” legislation. In other words, legislation which makes people feel good by doing something, even though that something accomplishes little, if anything. This includes passing Constitutional tests. As such, rather than running in neutral, might I present to the committee an alternative approach by recommending The City of Edina and/or Edian Public Schools give consideration to developing “gun safety training course”. The objective of the program would be in part focused on safety, but also in part tapering the allure many youth have with guns, in part proactively alerting them to the dangers of guns and of most importance, the personal responsibility of gun ownership. A gun safety/training program would be conducted and funded by volunteers with program highlights including but not limited to the following. * Attendee Scope: Op-In only for middle/high school students. * Legislation: Federal (e.g., Constitution) and State (e.g., Red Flag laws, etc.) * Emergency Situations: How to respond in the event of suspicious activities and/or emergency situation. * Range shooting. * Trainers: All Volunteers (e.g., Veterans, Law Enforcement, NRA, Gun Shop/Ranges, etc.). * Costs: Absorbed by Gun manufacturers, Gun shops/ranges, NRA, Donations, etc. * Expansion: Consider opening the program to all citizens. * Resource Sharing: As is done with fire fighter training, Edina could partner with other municipalities. As a counter to those who will oppose a gun safety/training program, might I remind the committee that, under adult supervision, students today participate in a Minnesota State High School League (MSHSL) sanctioned co-curucilar shooting programs for high school boys and girls. Unquestionably if you keep doing what you’re doing–You’ll keep getting what you’re getting (e.g., running in neutral). Sincerely hope the committee seriously considers the words of wisdom expressed in the first two items. Even more, sincerely, hoping the committee cease tracking along with the status quo, utilize a stepping outside the box mindset/approach, and be proactive in developing a gun safety/training program. I thank the committee for their time. Feedback welcome. Regards, L. A. Ellis - MSHSL Board of Directors – Emeritus Page 625 of 746 Respondent No:54 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 09:45:56 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 17:44:04 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Dear Mayor and City Council members - As a 30-year resident and homeowner in Edina, I strongly urge you to pass the proposed firearm safety and secure storage ordinance. We want Edina to remain the great place to live that it is. Page 626 of 746 Respondent No:55 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 09:49:04 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 17:32:41 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? It is important to enact controls over weapons that cause mass casualties/destruction. I see no valid reason for anyone to possess / use weapons like this unless there is a war. I'm not sure even law enforcement etc individuals have a need, certainly not a need for private weapons like this. This may be outside of the scope, but I do understand there may be a financial loss to individuals who currently possess the banned weapons. Can there be a buyback program associated to encourage turning over these weapons? And can the weapons be destroyed instead of being sold to a resident in the city across the border? Page 627 of 746 Respondent No:56 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 10:05:48 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 18:04:42 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I'm in full support of the Firearm Safety and Safe Storage ordinance. Our whole country needs increased sensible gun safety laws, and passing this at our city level is a great start. Page 628 of 746 Respondent No:57 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 11:38:49 am Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 19:30:48 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? As a long-time Edina resident who is concerned about the safety and well-being of all citizens, I fully support ordinance 2025-17 as drafted. There is zero logical reason why any of the proposed banned weapons and weapon add-ons, should be permitted in our community and outside of a personal residence. John Fassbender 6020 Halifax Ave. S Page 629 of 746 Respondent No:58 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 12:37:44 pm Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 20:36:29 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I 100% support the proposed firearm safety and secure storage ordinance. Please help keep our kids safe and pass this ordinance. Page 630 of 746 Respondent No:59 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 14:03:37 pm Last Seen:Jan 08, 2026 21:59:36 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I would like for the City Council to pass this ordinance. I understand there is state preemption clause, but this ordinance properly clarifies that it would not take effect until such time that state law changes. We must take action in all ways we can to protect our children and to protect each other; the power of our laws is in large part of reflect our values and it is clear that our residents support the content and intent of this law. By passing this ordinance, we advocate for our shared values and we increase the pressure to change the state law. These are principled reasons on their own to pass this ordinance. Page 631 of 746 Respondent No:60 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 08, 2026 16:21:15 pm Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 00:18:43 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? We should pass the proposed ordinance. It’s not much and it’s hard to know what to do. But the answer is not to do nothing. “It always seems impossible until it's done.”—Nelson Mandela Page 632 of 746 Respondent No:61 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 09:40:02 am Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 17:23:28 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? As a Grandparent and great aunt of Annunciation students I am begging you to pass this gun control ban. Someone has to start standing up for gun control of assault weapons. There is no need for a gun that can kill so many people in a minute. I can tell you from first hand witness that these Annunciation student and families are suffering. The night of the Christmas program WCCO news gave a nice report about the healing program. What they did not report was how a child fainted, parents rushed the stage and the children had no idea what was happening. They were scared, crying and some had to leave. My granddaughter does not feel safe. She has yet to make a full week of school. Loud noises scare her and she breaks down. It goes on and on. This is so painful to watch as a grandparent. My great niece will have shrapnel in her body for the rest of her life. It is horrible and painful as you don’t want to imagine! I don’t want any other family to have to go through this. They are changed forever. Please do the right thing and pass this gun control ordinance. The change has to start somewhere and I applaud your efforts bringing this forward. Please vote to pass this! Thank you, Anne Page 633 of 746 Respondent No:62 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 10:41:56 am Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 18:41:36 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the ordinance!! Page 634 of 746 Respondent No:63 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 10:44:05 am Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 18:41:58 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Please move forward with this local gun ordinance! It is unfortunate that it is necessary but it truly is necessary to protect our children and the community. Page 635 of 746 Respondent No:64 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 11:06:13 am Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 18:42:48 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Hello, my name is Patricia Roach. My husband (Daniel) and I share the same email. Your log in will not accept more than one person to be on the same email. I shall proceed. I do not support this gun ordinance. I attended the meeting on Jan. 6, 2026. The arguments for the ordinance were coming from a place of great emotion. I agree with everyone there that the shooting at Annunciation was tragic. No one would argue that it was not. Emotions are high on these situations but should be dealt with with thoughtfulness and some common sense as well. It seems the ordinance would prevent none of the things people were bringing up. We could disarm Edina residents completely and someone from Richfield,( like the kid who shot his gun at Annunication), could come to our schools, workplaces, malls, wherever and hurt many people. Minneapolis already has a law in place, as the rest of Minnesota, that says you can't bring a gun unto school property unless authorized. Well, he didn't obey the law. The bad guys never do. The good guys do obey the law-the ones you want to limit. I am not a big gun person at all. I just think you are considering something that will do nothing but give a sense of false-security to people (like the young girl who spoke at the meeting). You make a law; it gets broken, then you find another law to make. No results, just pacify the loud voices. Also, the category for the definition of a assault weapon can change at any time. As the one speaker said, you can use all sorts of items to assault a person such as a knife, a 2X4, a scissor, a car, a bat, a plastic bag! Another concern I have is that this ordinance can get our city in legal trouble. During the last meeting on this topic, many (except one) were concerned with how Edina could pass this ordinance and avoid being sued. What kind of thinking is that? Break a law and avoid punishment is the goal?? What kind of role modeling is being done here? I appreciate the one city council member who said this is not the right way to handle this. There are ways to change laws. I do not agree with the one council members comments regarding breaking the law in order to change the law. (He was referring to family in the 1960's who couldn't legally vote). As for a solution to this problem, perhaps the people who spoke against the passing of this ordinance had some good ideas. We need to identify people who are hurting and need counsel. We need people to understand what passing this ordinance means. As for city council people and mayor, please remember you are one of us. Please think about what this really means and will it be effective at all. Please do not pass a ordinance that will not change anything and only pacify the emotions that are on high right now. Thank you. Page 636 of 746 Respondent No:65 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 11:54:53 am Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 19:53:16 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I fully support this proposal that would help keep Edina residents, especially our children, safer. Page 637 of 746 Respondent No:66 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 11:57:41 am Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 19:50:31 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I fully support the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance and think it is very reasonable. For us as a community at a City level to do nothing says there is no opportunity for change in the country. We cannot wait for these changes to happen at a National level. We need a safer community for our families and children. I am an Australian Citizen living in the US (and now a US Citizen), with two small children. It is embarrassing that this country still falls back to the second amendment for reasons not to substantially change gun ownership. The Port Arthur Massacre happened 29 years ago and after that "horrific" event the country went "cold turkey" to use a members words from Tuesday night's public hearing - and it was through their NFA (National Firearm Agreement) and buyback scheme, funding, public support and strict laws. It led to faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and decades (29 years) without mass shootings. We need to push the needle in this very direction. Thank you. Page 638 of 746 Respondent No:67 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 09, 2026 16:06:28 pm Last Seen:Jan 09, 2026 23:47:04 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I strongly recommend the passing of the Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance! the amount of excessive firearms in our county is out of control. Too many people have lost their lives to senseless gun violence. I believe passing this ordinance will impact the City of Edina in a positive way. It will help create a safer environment for all who live, work, or play in the City of Edina. Page 639 of 746 Respondent No:68 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 06:49:50 am Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 14:45:44 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I support the ordinance. Page 640 of 746 Respondent No:69 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 10:20:43 am Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 18:06:44 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I strongly urge the City Council to pass the proposed ordinance regarding firearm safety and safe storage. While I am not a gun owner, I did grow up in a family that owned guns for hunting and understand why the second amendment is deeply protected . However, the weapons outlined in the city ordinance, to include assault weapons, large capacity magazines, and ghost guns are weapons of war and not intended for citizen ownership and should be prohibited. I greatly appreciate your serious consideration on this ordinance as a step toward combating gun violence in our country. Page 641 of 746 Respondent No:70 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 11:01:36 am Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 18:20:14 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Greeting Council Members: AR-15 "style" rifles have been the top selling rifle for many years. They have sold over 24 MILLION in the last 35 years, obviously not likely were many bought to shoot others. They are popular hunting rifles (2 fellows were using them last year to hunt deer on my property up north). They are also great for small game and targets, especially at long ranges. They were not designed by the military, and are not military weapons, those (M16s) are machine guns. They only look similar because they are of modern design with weatherproof materials. More traditional rifles are made of wood, and don't look so scary, but can shoot the exact same shells, just as fast, and with detachable magazines. Most mass shootings use other rifles or handguns (google). Note that video shows the Australian mass shooter holding a shotgun without a detachable magazine. It looks like you won't permit law abiding Edina residents to possess the most common rifles. Do some research or talk to a gun shop. If a few people used Jeeps to run over kids in school yards, would you then prohibit Edina residents from owning Jeeps (they have military origin, by the way)? John Elliott Page 642 of 746 Respondent No:71 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 13:23:39 pm Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 21:12:17 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? There are so many reasons to pass this ordinance that many of the speakers at the public hearing, which I heard a portion of, were able to express far more eloquently than I could. I was incredibly moved by the comments and personal sharing of how gun violence has directly impacted members of our community. We don't have to live like this. This ordinance will not end gun violence, but it's a concrete and consequential step toward trying to limit it at the profoundly damaging effects it has. And if (hopefully when) the state lifts the preemption, it would have Edina poised to act immediately. Edina Passing the ordinance may also provide a model and provide encouragement to other communities around the state to take action, which in turn sends a strong message to state leaders that we want to see a change. Page 643 of 746 Respondent No:72 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 14:06:46 pm Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 21:57:04 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Very simply, please keep us safe by implementing common sense gun reform. No one should have access to semi automatic weapons, or other guns that are designed to kill multiple people, unless they are thoroughly background checked, trained and supervised, such as for the military. Our American society is broken - children die every day - because of an overabundance of dangerous weapons in the hands of people who are not safe or sound of mind. Please lead the reduction of the most offensive weapons in our city. We will pray that national attention will one day follow our lead. Thank you. Page 644 of 746 Respondent No:73 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 14:31:44 pm Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 22:24:46 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Any attempt to curb gun violence is a step in the right direction. I would like to see more than this including a training class and interview session that the potential gun owner needs to complete with the police department. There would also need proof of proper gun storage. Page 645 of 746 Respondent No:74 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 14:52:47 pm Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 22:50:59 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? It’s critical that we protect our kids and residents. There is no reason for automatic, semi automatic or other mass murder weapons to be allowed in Edina. Pass the ordinance. Too many people have been hurt in our community already. The violence at Annunciation was senseless and avoidable. We must stop the madness. Page 646 of 746 Respondent No:75 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 17:31:54 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 01:27:53 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am fully in favor of this. Our kids deserve to be safe in schools, outside, at malls, friends houses, etc! Proud of my city for doing this & setting an example! Page 647 of 746 Respondent No:76 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 18:23:45 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 01:41:20 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? As a physician who cares for patient with gunshot wounds, I can say that the injuries sustained from high velocity firearms are significantly more destructive and difficult to treat. While we cannot stop everyone who means to hurt others, limiting the type of weapons available can greatly decrease the impact of their attacks. Safe storage is essential to preventing the accidental injury of children at home. Page 648 of 746 Respondent No:77 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 19:26:30 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 03:23:34 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am in strong support of the proposed firearm safety and safe storage ordinance. As a mother and a pediatric pulmonologist. Easy access to highly accurate weapons allow for accidents and impulsive decisions by young people that can't be taken back. My children don't understand why the grown ups havent been able to fix this. Edina's taking the first important step and should pass this ordinance. Page 649 of 746 Respondent No:78 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 21:09:51 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 04:57:25 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? As an Edina resident, I fully support Edina's proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance and believe that this is an important step towards creating a safer, more welcoming community for all Edina community members and visitors. As the mother of an EHS student with special needs, I am especially concerned about common sense firearm safety measures to keep all students, staff, city employees, and residents safe. The current climate of escalated fear, stress, and tensions that many Edina residents and employees are facing - from the local school shooting this fall to the ongoing federal actions in the Twin Cities - make this ordinance even more important now. Thank you for your considered attention to the safety of our Edina community and for your service on the City Council - I appreciate it! Page 650 of 746 Respondent No:79 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 10, 2026 21:23:22 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 04:13:19 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am in support of the proposed ordinance to regulate firearms and firearm components. I am a mom to two young children. It is unfathomable that we have seen no meaningful changes to gun control after countless mass shootings at schools. When the mass shooting at Annunciation happened, it was frightening, heartbreaking and only highlighted how you never know when or where it could happen or how close it could happen to you. Our children deserve protection from gun violence especially in a school setting where they should feel safe from harm. At the time of the shooting at Annunciation, my older child was 4 years old. I did not think I would need to explain the shooting to her. I hoped I would not have to. However, she saw the ribbons all around town and asked me about them. I did not want to lie to her and I did not want her to hear things that were untrue from others. As best as I could I explained to her what happened in what I felt was an age appropriate way. Her follow up questions were difficult for me to respond to. I hated telling her that kids were hurt at their school. We had not discussed death before so we had to broach that subject. We had to talk about bad guys and how there are other bad guys out there. I had to watch her sad, confused and scared face try to process what had happened. She was worried that her friends had been hurt. She was worried that a bad guy could come to her school. She lost some of her childhood innocence that day. Then I had to explain how the adults at her preschool will protect her so she is safe. I reassured her that we would never put her in a situation where she would not be safe. That was the only lie I had to tell her because sadly I can’t guarantee her safety. She will start kindergarten in the fall and it terrifies me that a school shooting could happen at her school. I understand that school shootings will continue to be a possibility. But I believe the proposed ordinance would regulate firearms in a way that could prevent or deter a mass shooting or hopefully reduce the number of casualties in that situation. It is certainly a step in the right direction and by voicing my support it makes me feel a little less helpless. With regard to the proposed safe storage of firearms, I am also in support of this as a mom. My older child is getting to the age of having drop off play dates. I plan to ask about any firearms in the house where my child will be playing but I think having specific safe storage requirements would go a long way in preventing firearm accidents with children. I think the proposed ordinance could have a meaningful impact on our community and the safety of our children. Bottom line, we need to protect our children, not guns. Thank you for your time and consideration. Page 651 of 746 Respondent No:80 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 05:55:33 am Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 13:49:27 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Please move forward with the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance. As a public school teacher, a parent, and a person who has grown up conducting lockdown drills at school since I was in middle school, I know we need to take action to prevent access to assault weapons and other weapons of war in our communities. Additionally, I urge you to lobby the state government to remove the preemption clause so that this ordinance may go into effect. Thank you for your work protecting our community. Page 652 of 746 Respondent No:81 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 09:26:19 am Last Seen:Jan 10, 2026 18:10:17 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council, I write to enthusiastically support the proposed Firearm Safety and Storage ordinance because of the public safety benefits it offers and because of the leadership it demonstrates to other units of government and to the state. I have written about the Annunciation shooting and gun control multiple times, including these linked articles. I recommend them to you. https://left.mn/2025/09/rob-doar-or-you-lying-eyes/ https://left.mn/2025/10/the- shield-act-wont-save-the-children-elliott/ Our neighbors’ grandson is one of the children killed at Annunciation. His mother was my son’s high school classmate in Edina. The ordinance is a respect for their loss. Critics say that the ordinance would be subject to challenges, that it is ultra vires for a municipality, etc. To that, I would just reply with what I used to say to my sons: You’ll never know until you try. I will emphasize a couple of things from my articles. The evidence collected at the scene are important exhibits in the case against rapid firing, high velocity arms, especially coupled with high-capacity magazines. According to media reports, Minneapolis police chief Brian O’Hara said investigators recovered two long guns, an AR-15 type rife and a shotgun, probably a pump action, and 116 spent cartridges for the rife and 3 spent shells for the shotgun. What do we conclude from this? I have not seen the actual evidence inventory, but it is probable that the shotgun was limited in capacity by a ‘duck plug,’ A shotgun with three shells is the highest capacity allowed under federal waterfowl rules. There were three spent shotgun shells because that is all the gun would hold. The rife was only limited by the number of high-capacity magazines that could be swapped out. It cannot be that we care more about ducks than our kids in school. Some members of the Minnesota Legislature champion the hardening of schools, and while elements of their proposals are good ideas, they aren’t a solution. As I write in the article above about the ‘Shield Act,’ there are many places that children gather that aren’t in the school itself: playgrounds, off-campus facilities, field trips, and in rows of school buses, nose to tail, with sides easily penetrated by a high velocity rifle. The Annunciation kids were not in the school itself. I will close with a story. When ‘conceal and carry’ was first proposed in the legislature, a group of us made a presentation to the Council to oppose it. This was so long ago that it was in the old city hall, and Mayor Hovland was Councilmember Hovland. The Council passed a resolution condemning conceal and carry, and with additional community activism, one state senator was turned around on the issue for his entire tenure in the legislature. So please do not underestimate your power. Respectfully, Steve Timmer Page 653 of 746 Respondent No:82 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 13:12:39 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 21:10:40 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? I am writing to you about the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance. I am against this ordinance. I personally do not own or plan to own firearms. As City attorney David Kendall pointed out, Minnesota state law currently preempts local regulation of firearms, ammunition and its related components. Therefore, this ordinance is not enforceable and likely to face legal challenges. As an Edina resident, I have seen double digit tax levy increase in recent years, way more than the pace of one's income increase. I believe it is extremely irresponsible for City Council to adopt such ordinance just to show the council’s stand using tax payers’ money. I urge you to be fiscally responsible and focus on issues that will truly benefit the residents, and not just something to show your own political view. A recent example of wasting tax payers’ money is the not much participated compost collection program that city forced upon residents. Page 654 of 746 Respondent No:83 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 14:15:11 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 22:13:05 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? The City should not move forward on the Ordinance and instead send a resolution to the State to work on improving firearm safety. What the city is proposing will create financial burden fighting lawsuits and from what I have read is illegal. Page 655 of 746 Respondent No:84 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 15:48:14 pm Last Seen:Jan 11, 2026 21:50:16 pm Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? TO: Mayor James B. Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council RE: Opposition to Proposed Firearm Ordinance Mayor Hovland and Council Members: I am writing to express my formal opposition to the proposed ordinance seeking to regulate, among other things, possession of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. As a Minnesota licensed attorney with over 30 years' experience, I read City Attorney Dave Kendall's October 22, 2025 memorandum, addressed to the Council, as an Opinion of Counsel. And, as an attorney who has written and/or received on behalf of clients hundreds, if not thousands, of Opinions of Counsel, it is crystal clear that the City Attorney believes, and is advising you, that this proposed ordinance exceeds the City of Edina's municipal authority and will likely result the City being made a defendant in costly litigation, and that the City's likelihood of prevailing is very slim, at best. The City Attorney's Opinion is based upon: 1. Statutory Preemption under Minnesota Law The proposed ordinance directly violates Minnesota Statute § 471.633, which explicitly states that the legislature "preempts all authority" of home rule charter or statutory cities to regulate firearms, ammunition, or their components. Total Exclusion: The statute provides that the state’s authority is to the "complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation" by a municipality. Void Ordinances: Under existing law, any local regulation inconsistent with this state statute is legally void. 2. Constitutional Violations (Second Amendment) Even if the proposed ordinance was not explicitly preempted by, and void pursuant to, Minnesota law, it fails the "history and tradition" test established by the U.S. Supreme Court in NYSRPA v. Bruen. Common Use Doctrine: Firearms classified as "assault weapons," such as the AR-15, are among the most popular and commonly owned rifles in America for lawful purposes. Under the Heller and Bruen precedents, firearms in common use for self-defense cannot be banned by the government. Magazines as "Arms": Federal courts have increasingly recognized that ammunition magazines are "components" of firearms protected by the Second Amendment. A ban on magazines over a certain capacity lacks a historical analogue in American tradition from the founding era. It is an improper use of municipal resources to pass symbolic legislation that the Council admits cannot be enforced until state law changes, while acknowledging that the City will most certainly experience immediate fiscal costs and potential liabilities in passing the same, given that Pro-Second Amendment organizations will undoubtedly sue the city if this ordinance is approved. Defending a clearly preempted ordinance wastes taxpayer funds on litigation that the city is unlikely to win under current judicial standards. Public safety is best served when the city focuses on functions within its legal purview—such as local law enforcement—rather than attempting to override state and federal constitutional protections. If the Council is serious about public safety, I suggest that the City's resources would be better utilized pressuring the Hennepin County Attorneys' Office to aggressively prosecute felony level behavior. Criminalizing possession of inanimate objects, by otherwise law-abiding residents of Edina, is not going to promote public safety. Aggressively prosecuting criminals who use weapons, of any kind, in the conduct of a crime, will. In addition, I would suggest that the City of Edina would be better served if the Council would concentrate its efforts on the historical functions of municipal government, such as infrastructure (sanitary and storm sewer, streets, snow removal, etc.), police and fire departments, parks, zoning and land use issues, building permits and inspections, etc. From my perspective, it appears that the City has lost its way as its focus seems to be primarily not on these historical, proper functions of municipal government, but on activist-favored topics such as equity and inclusion, bike paths, affordable housing, and the subject ordinance. I am not sure if the activism pushing these issues is within or external of City Hall. All I am saying is that the City would be, in these highly polarized times, much better served by the Council if it focused on blocking and tackling (the historical functions of municipal government) and not "tilting at windmills". I urge the Council to reject this ordinance. Sincerely, Brett A. Perry Page 656 of 746 Respondent No:85 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 17:44:57 pm Last Seen:Jan 12, 2026 01:13:20 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? My name is Ron Latz. I proudly represent Edina, Hopkins and St. Louis Park in the Minnesota Senate. I don't often get involved in local government decisions. However, this subject of reducing gun violence has been a significant focus of my legislative career. Because of that I was asked by several local leaders to offer my input on your opportunity to support our efforts to pass strong gun violence prevention laws at the state. I chief authored the two most significant gun violence reduction initiatives to pass the legislature in the last 20 years: the universal background check bill to close gun show and other loopholes to obtaining firearms, and the Extreme Risk Protection Order or “red flag” bill to give courts the authority to temporarily take guns away from people in crisis. These are two important steps that are saving lives today. But they are not enough. We need to ban assault weapons. We need to limit magazine capacity to 10 bullets. We need to ban ghost guns. We need to ban binary triggers. We need to mandate safe and secure storage of firearms. And we need to give local governments the authority to protect their communities at a level greater than the state may be capable of doing. This means removing preemption from State law. The city of Edina has a real opportunity to be a statewide leader in this effort. You have been this kind of leader before. When the statewide ban on smoking in restaurants and bars passed in 2007, we set a floor but not a ceiling on local efforts, allowing more protective measures by local governments. Edina was a trailblazer in protecting youthful consumers from tobacco by passing the ban on sales of tobacco products to persons under the age of 21- being the first in the state to do so, in 2017 - and banning the sale of flavored tobacco products. This paved the way for statewide passage of Tobacco 21 in 2020. Now another public health threat faces your community. Our society is awash in guns. They are poorly regulated. Many are in the hands of people that shouldn't have them. Many are untraceable. Many are modified to be even more lethal. Many are too easily accessible to children. Many are the types that cause damage like that on a battlefield. They should not be causing the same kind of damage in our schools and our churches. Some say assault weapons are for self-defense or for sport. In reality, they are weapons of war, not self-defense. And if choosing between saving lives and sporting pleasure, I choose life. If you choose to pass the proposed ordinance regulating guns in Edina – contingent on state action removing preemption – you would not just be expressing an opinion; you would be taking concrete action to protect Edina. You might also face a legal challenge. But rest assured, you will not face it alone. I would expect other communities to follow you by passing similar ordinances, like St. Paul has already done. I would expect other communities to join you in defending your ordinances. Public voices like mine will support you. I have no doubt that your residents will support you. You will once again be on the vanguard of a public health movement at the grassroots level. You would help build the political support for passing similar statewide protections against gun violence, taking an important step to protect the lives of all Minnesotans. I have spent years building political support to pass state laws reducing gun violence. Do not underestimate how important you can be in accomplishing that goal. Do this for your children. Do this for your first responders and medical professionals. Do this for your faith communities – and every person in Edina who could be victimized by gun violence. Take it from a former city council member: this will be a bold vote. But it might very well be one of the most important votes you take on the City Council. Ron Latz State Senator Edina, Hopkins and St. Louis Park Chair, Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee Page 657 of 746 Respondent No:86 Login:Registered Responded At:Jan 11, 2026 18:06:10 pm Last Seen:Jan 12, 2026 01:55:21 am Q1.What feedback would you like the City Council to consider regarding the proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance? Please support the draft ordinance on Firearm Safety and Safe Storage. Gun violence is the #1 cause of death for children, an abhorrent fact for a country with our resources and a moral failure by all of us. I am sick and tired of the fear and trauma we allow to persist. Take this one small step to show our children that we care about them and insist on responsible behavior by adults. Page 658 of 746 Page 659 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.4 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Title: Ordinance 2026-02: Amending Section 4-9-9; Repealing and Replacing Chapter 6 Article III Lawful Gambling of the Edina City Code Action Requested: Provide direction to staff. Information/Background: The City’s current lawful gambling ordinance regulates exempt gambling activities conducted within Edina per event. The ordinance does not currently allow for premise permits, which are required by statute for ongoing lawful gambling conducted at a licensed premises (such as pull-tabs). In June 2025, the Edina Education Fund formally requested that the City consider amending its lawful gambling ordinance to allow premise permits. The request was made to allow eligible nonprofit organizations to conduct lawful gambling activities in Edina consistent with state law and the Gambling Board requirements. If allowed, premise permits require City Council approval of the location, as they authorize ongoing gambling activity at a specific location rather than a single, exempt event. Staff is proposing to repeal and replace the City’s lawful gambling ordinance and a necessary amendment to Chapter 4 Liquor Ordinance, because it prohibits any gambling at licensed establishments. The proposed ordinance changes are intended to: • Allow premises permits. • Clarify that lawful gambling may occur in on-sale liquor establishments. • Align the City’s regulations with the state-administered lawful gambling framework, recognizing that the Gambling Board and Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement performs most of the regulatory oversight. • Simplify local administration for exempt lawful gambling. The proposed ordinance incorporates the following requirements: • Premises Permits: The ordinance limits the number of premises permits initially allowed within the city. Staff recommend starting with three (3) premises permits to allow staff to get a full understanding of the demand and staff’s capacity to manage the funds and reporting requirements. • Eligibility: Only organizations within Edina’s city limits/jurisdictions. • Trade Area: A required percentage or all of net gambling proceeds must be expended within the City’s trade area. Staff recommend 70%. The trade area is all cities contiguous to Edina. • Financial Requirements: Page 660 of 746 o Impose up to 3% local gambling tax on gross receipts from gambling, minus prizes actually paid out. The tax must only be used to cover the cost of regulating lawful gambling. Staff recommend 3%. o Contribution of 10% of net profit to a fund administered by the City. Use of funds are to be determined by the Council. Potential uses could include community events such as the 4th of July Parade. Because the Board performs most of the regulatory oversight, the City would not establish a separate local application process for premises permits. Organizations would submit duplicate of their application to the Board to the City. The Council would approve or deny their location by resolution. Local Permits for Exempt Gambling: Under the current ordinance only two local permits for exempt gambling events are allowed annually. An application and background checks are required as part of the process. Staff is recommending: • Increasing the number of allowed local permits from two (2) to four (4) annually because there is a desire for more frequency. • Eliminating the local application and background check process. • Relying instead on the Board’s review and allowing the City to simply sign off on the Board’s LG220 form. This process works great for some peer cities. • If we continue with the current process, increase the application fee from $15 to $50. Staff’s recommendation is to review the ordinance and provide direction. Supporting Documentation: 1. Staff Presentation Page 661 of 746 Ordinance 2026-02: Amending Section 4-9-9; Repealing and Replacing Chapter 6 Article III Lawful Gambling of the Edina City Code The City Council of Edina, Minnesota ordains: Section 1. Chapter 4, Section 4-9-9, paragraph (c) of the Edina City Code, related to prohibited conditions in licensed liquor establishments, is amended to read as follows: c. Gambling prohibited. Except for lawful gambling conducted in accordance with chapter 6, article III of this code, gamblingGambling is prohibited in licensed premises. Section 2. Chapter 6, Article III, relating to Law Gambling, is repealed in its entirety and replaced with the following. Sec. 6-60. Adoption of state law by reference. The provisions of Minn. Stat. ch. 349, as they may be amended from time to time, are hereby adopted by reference and are made a part of this ordinance as if set out in full. It is the intention of the Council that all future amendments of Minn. Stat. ch. 349, are hereby adopted by reference or referenced as if they had been in existence at the time this ordinance was adopted. Sec. 6-61. City may be more restrictive than state law. The Council is authorized by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 349.213, as it may be amended from time to time, to impose, and has imposed in this ordinance, additional restrictions on gambling within its limits beyond those contained in Minn. Stat. ch. 349, as it may be amended from time to time. Sec. 6-62. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate lawful gambling within the City of Edina, to prevent its commercialization, to ensure the integrity of operations, and to provide for the use of net profits only for lawful purposes. Sec. 6-63. Definitions. In addition to the definitions contained in Minn. Stat. § 349.12, as it may be amended from time to time, the following terms are defined for purposes of this ordinance: BOARD means the State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board. CITY means the City of Edina. COUNCIL means the city council of the City of Edina. LICENSED ORGANIZATION means an organization licensed by the Board. LOCAL PERMIT means a permit issued by the city to allow lawful gambling that is excluded or exempted Page 662 of 746 from state licensing requirements. PREMISES PERMIT means a permit issued by the Board and approved by the city council allowing lawful gambling at a specific location. TRADE AREA means a geographic area comprised of the City of Edina and each city contiguous to the city. Sec. 6-64. Applicability. This ordinance regulates all forms of lawful gambling within the city except bingo conducted in a nursing home or senior citizen housing project under the conditions set forth in Minn. Stat. § 349.166, subd. 1(b). Sec. 6-65. Lawful gambling permitted. Lawful gambling is permitted within the city provided that it is conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 609.75–.763, inclusive, as they may be amended from time to time, and Minn. Stat. §§ 349.11–.23, inclusive, as they may be amended from time to time, and this Article III. Sec. 6-66. Application and approval of premises permits. a. Application. The Board will notify the city when a licensed organization applies for a premises permit under Minn. Stat. ch. 349. The organization seeking to obtain a premises permit from the Board must file with the city clerk a duplicate of its licensing application and premises permit application as filed with the state, including all exhibits and documents accompanying the application. b. Investigation. The city clerk shall transmit the application to the chief of police or designee for review and recommendation. The chief of police or designee will investigate the matter and make a recommendation to the city council no later than 45 days following the city’s receipt of the application materials. c. The city clerk will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the council will consider the recommendation. The council must by resolution approve or disapprove the application within 60 days of the city’s receipt of the application. The council shall deny an application for issuance of a premises permit or for reissuance of a premises permit after suspension, revocation or other termination, for any of the following reasons: 1. The organization has violated any state statute, state rule, or city ordinance relating to gambling within the last three (3) years. 2. The entity leasing its premises to the applicant organization has violated any state statute, state rule, or city ordinance relating to the operation of the establishment, including, but not limited to, laws relating to alcoholic beverages, gambling, controlled substances, or protection of public safety within the last three (3) years. 3. Lawful gambling would be conducted at a premises where there is not a written lease between the on-sale establishment and the licensed organization for a term of at least one (1) year. 4. Lawful gambling would be conducted at more than three (3) premises within the city. Page 663 of 746 5. Operation of gambling at the site would be detrimental to health, safety, and welfare of the community. Otherwise, the council shall pass a resolution approving the application. Section 6-67. Application and approval of local permits. a. Except as allowed by section 6-64 of this code, no organization shall conduct lawful gambling that is exempt or excluded from state licensing requirements under Minn. Stat. § 349.166, as it may be amended from time to time, without first obtaining a local permit from the city. b. Applications for issuance or renewal of a local permit shall be a form provided by the city clerk and must contain the following information: 1. Name and address of the organization requesting the permit. 2. Name and address(es) of the officers and person accounting for receipts, expenses, and profits for the event. 3. Dates of gambling occasion for which a permit is requested. 4. Address of premises where event will occur. 5. Estimated value of prizes to be awarded. 6. Affirmation that no officer or director has been convicted of a felony, gross misdemeanor, or gambling-related offense. c. Review and administrative approval: Upon receipt of a completed application, the city clerk shall transmit the application to the chief of police for investigation and recommendation. The chief of police or designee shall complete the investigation and provide a recommendation to the city clerk within forty-five (45) days. The city manager shall approve or deny the local permit based on the standards set forth in this ordinance. d. Fee: The fee for a local permit shall be as listed in the fee schedule. e. Local permits are subject to the following restrictions: 1. No more than two (2) permits per organization per calendar year. 2. At least seven (7) days must separate permitted gambling occasions. 3. Each permit may authorize gambling for no more than three (3) consecutive days. 4. Gambling may occur only at the premises and on the dates specified in the permit. 5. All prizes shall be awarded at the time and place authorized in the permit. Sec. 6-68. License and permit display. All permits issued under state law and local permits issued under this ordinance must be prominently displayed at the premises where gambling is conducted for the duration of the permit. Sec. 6-69. Notification of material changes to application. A licensed organization holding a state-issued premises permit shall notify the city within ten (10) days in writing whenever any material change is made in the information submitted on the application. Sec. 6-70. Local gambling tax a. A local gambling tax of three percent (3%) per year is imposed on the gross receipts of a licensed organization from all lawful gambling less prizes actually paid out by the organization. b. The tax shall be paid by the organization on a monthly basis and shall be reported on a copy of the monthly gambling activity summary and tax return filed with the Minnesota Department of Page 664 of 746 Revenue. The report shall be an exact duplicate of the report filed with the Department, without deletions or additions, and must contain the signatures of organization officials as required on the report form. c. The tax return and payment of the tax due must be postmarked, or, if hand-delivered, received in the city finance office, on or before the last business day of the month following the month for which the report is made. d. An incomplete tax return will not be considered timely filed unless corrected and returned by the due date for filing. e. Interest shall be charged at a rate of eight percent (8%) on all overdue taxes owed by the organization under this section. Sec. 6-71. Contribution of net profits to fund administered by city. Each organization licensed to conduct lawful gambling within the city pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 349.16, as it may be amended from time to time, shall contribute ten percent (10%) of its net profits derived from lawful gambling in the city to a fund administered and regulated by the city without cost to the fund. The city shall disburse the funds for charitable contributions as defined by Minn. Stat. § 349.12, subd. 7a, as it may be amended from time to time. Payment under this section shall be made on the last day of each month. The city’s use of such funds shall be determined at the time of adoption of the city’s annual budget or when the budget is amended. Section 6-72. Designated trade area. a. Each organization licensed to conduct gambling within the city shall expend seventy percent (70%) of its lawful purpose expenditures on lawful purposes conducted within the city’s trade area. b. This section applies only to lawful purpose expenditures of gross profits derived from gambling conducted at a premises within the city’s jurisdiction. Section 6-73. Records and reporting. a. Licensed organizations conducting lawful gambling shall file with the city finance director one copy of all records and reports required to be filed with the Board, pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 349, as it may be amended from time to time, and rules adopted pursuant thereto, as they may be amended from time to time. The records and reports shall be filed on or before the day they are required to be filed with the Board. b. Organizations licensed by the Board shall file a report with the city finance director proving compliance with the trade area spending requirements imposed by section 6-72. The report shall be made on a form prescribed by the city and shall be submitted annually. Section 6-74. Hours of operation. Lawful gambling shall not be conducted between 1 a.m. and 8 a.m. on any day of the week. Sec. 6-75. Revocation and suspension of local permit. Page 665 of 746 The city council may revoke or temporarily suspend a local permit for a violation by the permitted organization of any state statute, state rule, or city ordinance relating to gambling. A local permit shall not be revoked or suspended until written notice and an opportunity for a hearing have first been given to the permitted organization. The notice shall be personally served or sent by U.S. mail. The notice must state the violation and that the permitted organization is entitled to a hearing on the matter. If the permitted organization requests a hearing, the council shall hold a hearing. If, as a result of the hearing, the council finds that an ordinance violation exists, then the council may suspend or revoke the permit. Section 6-76. Penalty. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance; or Minn. Stat. §§ 609.75-609.763, inclusive, as they may be amended from time to time; or Minn. Stat. §§ 349.11-349.21, as they may be amended from time to time; or any rules promulgated under those sections, as they may be amended from time to time, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, or both, plus in either case the costs of prosecution. In addition, violations involving licensed organizations shall be reported to the Board and recommendation shall be made for suspension, revocation, or cancellation of an organization’s license. Section 6-77. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this ordinance is found to be invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining provisions shall not be affected. Section 3. Effective date. This ordinance becomes effective immediately. Summary for Publication: Ordinance 2026-02 amends Chapter 4, Section 4-9-9 to lawful gambling in licensed liquor establishments, and Chapter 6, Article III Lawful Gambling is repealed and replaced to allow premises permit gambling and modification to exempt gambling. Page 666 of 746 EdinaMN.gov Lawful Gambling Repealing and Replacing Ordinance EdinaMN.gov Page 667 of 746 Background & Need for Change •Current ordinance regulates exempt gambling events only •Does not allow premises permits •June 2025, the Edina Education Fund Page 668 of 746 What Is Being Proposed •Repeal and replace the City’s lawful gambling ordinance •Amend Chapter 4 Liquor Ordinance •These changes would: •Allow premises permits. •Clarify that lawful gambling may occur in on-sale liquor establishments. •Align with the state-administered lawful gambling framework. •Simplify local administration for exempt gambling. Insert PNG Logo Sizing Instructions:Shape Format > Crop Dropdown > “Fill”. Make sure to add alt text. Page 669 of 746 Premises Permit Framework •City Council approval required •Initial limit: Three (3) premises permits citywide. •Eligibility: Only nonprofit organizations located within Edina’s jurisdiction. •Trade Area Requirement: •At least 70% of net gambling proceeds must be spent within the trade area. •Trade areas include Edina and all contiguous cities. Insert PNG Logo Sizing Instructions:Shape Format > Crop Dropdown > “Fill”. Make sure to add alt text. Page 670 of 746 Financial & Regulatory Requirements •Local Gambling Tax: •Up to 3% of gross receipts minus prizes paid. •Cover the cost of regulating lawful gambling. •Staff recommend the full 3%. •Net Profit Contribution: •10% of net profit contributed to a City-administered fund. •Use of funds determined by Council •Regulatory Oversight: •Gambling Control Board and Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement perform primary oversight. •Council approves or denies the location by resolution. •No separate City application; applicants submit a duplicate of their state application to the City. Insert PNG Logo Sizing Instructions:Shape Format > Crop Dropdown > “Fill”. Make sure to add alt text. Page 671 of 746 Exempt Gambling Permits - Proposed Changes •Increase from 2 to 4 per year. •Eliminate local application and background checks. •Rely on the Gambling Control Board’s review and City sign-off on the LG220 form. •If the current process is retained, increase the application fee from $15 to $50. Insert PNG Logo Sizing Instructions:Shape Format > Crop Dropdown > “Fill”. Make sure to add alt text. Page 672 of 746 Staff Recommendation •Repeal and replace Lawful Gambling Ordinance •Amend the Liquor Ordinance to allow lawful gambling •Allow 3 Premises Permits •Nonprofit organizations located in Edina •70% of net gambling proceed spent in the trade areas •3% gambling tax to cover the cost of regulating lawful gambling •10% of net profit to a City-administer fund •Increase exempt permits and eliminate the application and background process Insert PNG Logo Sizing Instructions:Shape Format > Crop Dropdown > “Fill”. Make sure to add alt text. Page 673 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.5 Department: Community Development Item Activity: Discussion Prepared By: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Title: Sketch Plan Review: 6016 Vernon Avenue (EV Charging Station) Action Requested: No action requested. The City Council is asked to provide non-binding comment and direction on a potential future development request. Information/Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to remodel the existing Kee’s auto repair shop at 6016 Vernon Avenue into an electric vehicle charging station. The site would feature seven level 3 DC fast chargers. The existing building would be remodeled to be a lounge waiting area with a mini convenience store or vending machines. A third option is also shown as a possibility of a small 3rd party tenant space. The desired hours of operation is 24 hours per day. To accommodate this request, the following would be required: • A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from MDR, Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Node. The site is zoned PCD-4, in which a gas station is a permitted use. A gas station is defined as “a principal building and its accessory structures used for the sale of motor fuels and oils, where automotive accessories and convenience goods may be sold, but where repair and servicing of motor vehicles does not occur; provided, however, that an accessory carwash is permitted.” • Site Plan Review. • Multiple Variances: Drive Aisle/Parking Space Setbacks, Setback to Residential Property, Canopy setbacks, Pump Island Setbacks, and Parking Lot Setback from the Building. (See Compliance Table on page 3 of this staff report.) Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. Planning Commission Staff Memo 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Site Plan, Canopy & Inside Examples, and Floor Plans 4. Applicant Submittal (Board Portal) 5. Planning Commission - Staff Presentation 6. Applicant PowerPoint Presentation at Planning Commission (Board Portal) Page 674 of 746 Staff Report Date: January 14, 2026 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Subject: Sketch Plan Review – 6016 Vernon (EV Charging Station) Staff Recommendation: No recommendation. The Planning Commission is asked to provide non- binding comment and direction on a potential future development request. The proposed electric vehicle charging station is a permitted use in the PCD-4 zoning district, in which this site is located. The site, however, is guided for medium density residential use in the Comprehensive Plan. Information/Background: The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to remodel the existing Kee’s auto repair shop at 6016 Vernon Avenue into an electric vehicle charging station. The site would feature seven level 3 DC fast chargers. The existing building would be remodeled to be a lounge waiting area with a mini convenience store or vending machines. A third option is also shown as a possibility of a small 3rd party tenant space. (See attached applicant narrative and plans.) The desired hours of operation is 24 hours per day. To accommodate this request, the following would be required: ➢ A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from MDR, Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Node. The site is zoned PCD-4, in which a gas station is a permitted use. A gas station is defined as “a principal building and its accessory structures used for the sale of motor fuels and oils, where automotive accessories and convenience goods may be sold, but where repair and servicing of motor vehicles does not occur; provided, however, that an accessory carwash is permitted.” ➢ Site Plan Review. ➢ Multiple Variances: Drive Aisle/Parking Space Setbacks, Setback to Residential Property, Canopy setbacks, Pump Island Setbacks, and Parking Lot Setback from the Building. (See Compliance Table on page 3 of this staff report.) As with all sketch plan reviews, the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus should be on the scale of the proposed use given the number of variances necessary as part of the proposed site plan. Page 675 of 746 Issues/Considerations: Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided MDR, Medium Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Below is the land use category and description: Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity MDR Medium-Density Residential Applies to attached housing (townhouses, quads, etc.) and multi-family complexes of moderate density. May also include small institutional uses. In new development or redevelopment, improve integration of multi-family housing into an interconnected street network and work to create an attractive, pedestrian-friendly street edge. 5 – 12 residential dwelling units/acre Based on the current designation of medium density residential, a total of 4 units maximum could be developed on the site, due to its small lot size. Over the past couple years, residential developers have looked at the site for potential residential development. None had any interest in pursuing development; that includes the developer that submitted a sketch plan for the 20-unit memory care housing project. The site could be considered for a land use designation of NN, Neighborhood Node. This category is where several of the City’s current gas stations are located. (See attached PowerPoint) Categories Description, Land Uses Development Character and Guidelines Density and Intensity NN Neighborhood Node*** Current examples: • 44th & France • 70th & Cahill • Valley In general, small-to moderate-scale commercial, residential or mixed-use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood(s). Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood-serving retail and services, offices, Building footprints generally less than 20,000 sq. ft. (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage underground parking (for comparatively larger developments), district parking for smaller Varies by small area: • Wooddale/Valley View – 12-30 du/acre • 70th & Cahill – 10-50 du/acre • 44th & France – 12- 60 du/acre • Lincoln/Londonderry – 10-60 du/acre Page 676 of 746 View & Wooddale • Lincoln & Londonderry studios, institutional and residential. Within Lincoln & Londonderry, limited industrial is also a primary use. developments, and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 30%/70% residential/commercial mixed-use Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-4) Proposed Setbacks (Structure) Front (Vernon) Front (EP Road) Side (West) Setbacks (Canopy) Front (Vernon) Front (EP Road) Side (West) Setbacks (Pump Islands) Front (Vernon) Front (EP Road) Side (West) Setbacks (Parking lot) Drive aisle (Vernon) Drive aisle (EP Road) Side (West) Setback from Residential Use From adjacent property From property separated by a street 35 feet 25 feet 25 feet 35 feet 25 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet 50 feet 110 feet 25 feet (existing) 20 feet (existing) 25 feet (existing) 0 feet* 10 feet* 40+ feet 0 feet* 10 feet* 50+ feet 0 feet* 10 feet* 12 feet 12 feet* 60 feet* Parking Setback from Building 10 feet 6 & 8 feet* Maximum Lot Size 60,000 s.f. 16,373 s.f. Minimum Lot Size 15,000 s.f. 16,373 s.f. Parking Stalls 1 space per employee plus 1 space per 300 square feet 5 stalls required 16 stalls FAR 30% 8% *Variance Required Page 677 of 746 Gas Station Regulations. Per Section 36-618 (15) of the Edina City Code, the following is required for Gas Stations: (15) Automobile service centers and gas station standards. a. Minimum lot area: 1. For an automobile service center, 20,000 square feet, plus 5,000 square feet for each service bay in excess of three. 2. For a gas station, 15,000 square feet. b. Maximum lot area: 60,000 square feet. c. Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a building. d. Interior curbs of not less than six inches in height shall be constructed to separate driving surfaces from sidewalks, landscaped areas and streets. e. No automobile service station on a lot adjoining a lot in a residential district shall be operated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. f. All driving surfaces shall be constructed and maintained in the same manner as prescribed for parking lots by this chapter. g. No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building, except in that area within four feet of the building or within pump islands used for dispensing motor fuels. h. No motor vehicles, except those owned by the operators and employees of the principal use, and vehicles awaiting service, shall be parked on the lot occupied by the principal use. Vehicles being serviced may be parked for a maximum of 48 hours. i. Body work and painting is prohibited. j. No buildings, driveway surfaces, parking areas or other improvements shall be located within 110 feet of any portion of a lot in a residential district which is used for residential purposes if separated from the lot by a street, or within 50 feet, if not so separated by a street. k. Pump islands shall maintain a front and side street setback of at least 20 feet and an interior side yard and rear yard setback of at least 25 feet. l. Notwithstanding the requirements of article XII, division 3 of this chapter, driveways and drive aisles need only provide a setback of not more than five feet from all lot lines, subject to the requirements of subsection (15)j of this section. Page 678 of 746 Signage. Signage is not specifically proposed yet. Below are the Code requirements for signage in the PCD-4 Zoning District: PCD-4 20% of wall area 20-foot setback to a street Number of Signs – One per building per frontage 80 square feet for first sign, 50 square feet for each additional sign 20 feet tall Sidewalks. A sidewalk would be required to be installed along Vernon Avenue per the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Trash Enclosure. Detailed information would have to be provided for any trash enclosure. Trash storage facilities, including recycling storage facilities, shall be screened from all lot lines and public road rights-of-way. Per Section. 36-1460 all required screening shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening shall be located upon any public road right-of-way, or within 20 feet of the traveled portion of a street. Screening of parking. Per Section 36-1457 (4) of the Zoning Ordinance: “Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces and all loading facilities shall be screened from streets located within 50 feet, and from lots which are used for any residential purpose which are located within 50 feet. Said distance shall be the shortest distance between the parking facility or loading facility and the nearest part of the street or the nearest lot line of the residential lot.” This site is located within 50 feet of residential uses to the west and north. There is little or no room to provide landscaping given the proposed setback. A 6-foot wooden fence would be recommended around the parking area to provide screening. Traffic and Parking Study. Will be done as part of a formal application. Page 679 of 746 Project Narrative – IONNA DCFC EV Charging Project Site Address: 6016 Vernon Ave S, Edina, MN 55436 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: December 17, 2025 Site Area: 16,552.8 SF (0.38 AC) Proposed Use: Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Station Project Overview This project proposes the installation of a public EV charging station at 6016 Vernon Ave S, Edina, MN. The site will feature seven Level 3 DC fast chargers (Alpitronic HYC400, 400kW each) with supporting civil and electrical infrastructure, including a new utility transformer, main switchboard, and site lighting. The project is designed to meet all applicable Minnesota codes and City of Edina requirements. Site Improvements • EV Charging Infrastructure: Seven dual-port Level 3 DC fast chargers (Alpitronic HYC400, 400kW each), installed on reinforced concrete pads with protective bollards, and automatic load management system per NEC 625.42. • Electrical Upgrades: New pad-mounted utility transformer (2000 kVA, Delta-Wye configuration), main switchboard (MSB-1, 3000A, 480Y/277V, NEMA 3R) with ground fault protection, humidistat, space heater, and sun shield. • Site Lighting: Per the submitted design, eight pole-mounted LED fixtures for visibility and security, designed to meet City of Edina code requirements. • Alternative option would be to install elevated lit canopies over the charging stations to provide shelter from weather, shade during the warmer months, and lighting for safety at night. • Civil Improvements: Demolition of existing surfaces, grading and paving for ADA compliance, installation of new concrete and asphalt pavement, curbing, striping, stormwater management, erosion control, and landscaping improvements (approx. 715 SF). • Parking: 14 new parking stalls (6 NACS, 8 CCS), including 1 van-accessible ADA stall, revised layout and pavement markings to comply with ADA and City standards. • Charging available 24/7. Lounge, vending and washrooms available to customers only via QR code obtained that the charging station. Public access to 3rd party tenant space would be available during hours of operation. On-site cameras for added security. Zoning and Code Compliance Zoning: Commercial PCD-4 (current and proposed use). Codes: Minnesota Building Code 2020, Minnesota Electrical Code 2023, Minnesota Mechanical Page 680 of 746 Code 2020, Minnesota Plumbing Code 2020, Minnesota Fire Code 2020, Minnesota Commercial Energy Code 2024. All work will comply with the most restrictive applicable code. Utility Coordination Power Company: Xcel Energy Utility contact: Kieran Schwartz (612-494-4271, kieran.e.schwartz@xcelenergy.com). Transformer and switchboard location coordinated with utility provider. Construction Phasing 1. Site Preparation: Demolition, grading, trenching, and underground conduit installation. 2. Concrete Work: Pouring pads for chargers, transformer, and switchboard. 3. Electrical Installation: Setting switchboard, transformer, conduits, and wiring. 4. Equipment Installation: Placing chargers, lighting, and safety features. 5. Final Testing & Commissioning: System checks, including load management testing, before going live. Sustainability Features • Support for Electric Vehicles: Installation of seven high-capacity Level 3 DC fast chargers reduces greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. • Energy Efficiency: High-efficiency LED lighting and automatic load management system minimize energy consumption and peak demand. • Stormwater Management: Compliance with local regulations to protect waterways and reduce runoff impacts. • Sustainable Landscaping: Approximately 715 SF of drought-tolerant landscaping, irrigation system with zoned controls, and use of organic fertilizers. • Recycling and Waste Reduction: Construction activities prioritize recycling and reuse of materials; site amenities include pet waste station and trash receptacles. • Accessibility and Community Benefit: ADA-compliant parking and access routes ensure equitable access to sustainable transportation options. • Alteration of existing car service station and reconfiguration of interior spaces to provide a lounge and vending area for customers utilizing their EV chargers. The exterior of the building will also be repainted. Summary This project will provide a state-of-the-art public EV charging facility in Edina, MN, supporting the city’s sustainability goals and providing essential infrastructure for electric vehicle users. The design prioritizes safety, accessibility, and code compliance, with robust civil, electrical, and landscaping improvements to enhance the site and surrounding area. Page 681 of 746 Proposed Site Plan Page 682 of 746 Example Building Renderings Page 683 of 746 Floor Plan Page 684 of 746 Project Narrative – IONNA DCFC EV Charging Project Site Address: 6016 Vernon Ave S, Edina, MN 55436 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: December 17, 2025 Site Area: 16,552.8 SF (0.38 AC) Proposed Use: Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Station Project Overview This project proposes the installation of a public EV charging station at 6016 Vernon Ave S, Edina, MN. The site will feature seven Level 3 DC fast chargers (Alpitronic HYC400, 400kW each) with supporting civil and electrical infrastructure, including a new utility transformer, main switchboard, and site lighting. The project is designed to meet all applicable Minnesota codes and City of Edina requirements. Site Improvements • EV Charging Infrastructure: Seven dual-port Level 3 DC fast chargers (Alpitronic HYC400, 400kW each), installed on reinforced concrete pads with protective bollards, and automatic load management system per NEC 625.42. • Electrical Upgrades: New pad-mounted utility transformer (2000 kVA, Delta-Wye configuration), main switchboard (MSB-1, 3000A, 480Y/277V, NEMA 3R) with ground fault protection, humidistat, space heater, and sun shield. • Site Lighting: Per the submitted design, eight pole-mounted LED fixtures for visibility and security, designed to meet City of Edina code requirements. • Alternative option would be to install elevated lit canopies over the charging stations to provide shelter from weather, shade during the warmer months, and lighting for safety at night. • Civil Improvements: Demolition of existing surfaces, grading and paving for ADA compliance, installation of new concrete and asphalt pavement, curbing, striping, stormwater management, erosion control, and landscaping improvements (approx. 715 SF). • Parking: 14 new parking stalls (6 NACS, 8 CCS), including 1 van-accessible ADA stall, revised layout and pavement markings to comply with ADA and City standards. • Charging available 24/7. Lounge, vending and washrooms available to customers only via QR code obtained that the charging station. Public access to 3rd party tenant space would be available during hours of operation. On-site cameras for added security. Zoning and Code Compliance Zoning: Commercial PCD-4 (current and proposed use). Codes: Minnesota Building Code 2020, Minnesota Electrical Code 2023, Minnesota Mechanical Page 685 of 746 Code 2020, Minnesota Plumbing Code 2020, Minnesota Fire Code 2020, Minnesota Commercial Energy Code 2024. All work will comply with the most restrictive applicable code. Utility Coordination Power Company: Xcel Energy Utility contact: Kieran Schwartz (612-494-4271, kieran.e.schwartz@xcelenergy.com). Transformer and switchboard location coordinated with utility provider. Construction Phasing 1. Site Preparation: Demolition, grading, trenching, and underground conduit installation. 2. Concrete Work: Pouring pads for chargers, transformer, and switchboard. 3. Electrical Installation: Setting switchboard, transformer, conduits, and wiring. 4. Equipment Installation: Placing chargers, lighting, and safety features. 5. Final Testing & Commissioning: System checks, including load management testing, before going live. Sustainability Features • Support for Electric Vehicles: Installation of seven high-capacity Level 3 DC fast chargers reduces greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants. • Energy Efficiency: High-efficiency LED lighting and automatic load management system minimize energy consumption and peak demand. • Stormwater Management: Compliance with local regulations to protect waterways and reduce runoff impacts. • Sustainable Landscaping: Approximately 715 SF of drought-tolerant landscaping, irrigation system with zoned controls, and use of organic fertilizers. • Recycling and Waste Reduction: Construction activities prioritize recycling and reuse of materials; site amenities include pet waste station and trash receptacles. • Accessibility and Community Benefit: ADA-compliant parking and access routes ensure equitable access to sustainable transportation options. • Alteration of existing car service station and reconfiguration of interior spaces to provide a lounge and vending area for customers utilizing their EV chargers. The exterior of the building will also be repainted. Summary This project will provide a state-of-the-art public EV charging facility in Edina, MN, supporting the city’s sustainability goals and providing essential infrastructure for electric vehicle users. The design prioritizes safety, accessibility, and code compliance, with robust civil, electrical, and landscaping improvements to enhance the site and surrounding area. Page 686 of 746 VERNON AVE OLINGER RD EDEN PRA IR IE RDSheet NumberSheet TitleG0.0COVER SHEETG1.0GENERAL NOTES IG1.1GENERAL NOTES IIG2.0CHARGER SPEC SHEETSC1.0ALTA SURVEY (BY OTHERS)C2.0SITE PLANC2.1ENLARGED SITE PLANC2.2FF&E PLANC2.3FINISH PLANC3.0DEMO PLANC4.0GRADING PLANC5.0E&S DETAILSC6.0CIVIL DETAILSC6.1CIVIL DETAILSC6.2CIVIL DETAILSC6.3CIVIL DETAILSE1.0ELECTRICAL NOTESE2.0SINGLE LINE DIAGRAME3.0ELECTRICAL DETAILSE3.1ELECTRICAL DETAILSDATE AS SHOWNSHEET NUMBERCHECKED BY SCALE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY KHA PROJECT #002 12/17/2025This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.#012 #013, #014 #015 SITE NO.: #XXXX.XXXX #910 #911 #912 THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FORUSE ON A SPECIFIC SITE: #012,#013, #014, AND IS VALID ONLY ASOF ITS ISSUE DATE (12/17/2025). ITIS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON ANYOTHER PROJECT SITE OR AT ALATER TIME. ANY USE OF THISPLAN AS A REFERENCE OREXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECTREQUIRES THE INVOLVEMENT OFAPPROPRIATELY LICENSEDENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION ORREUSE OF THIS PLAN FORANOTHER PROJECT ISUNAUTHORIZED AND MAY VIOLATEAPPLICABLE LAWS.STIPULATION FOR REUSE421 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600,RALEIGH, NC 27601Main: (919) 677-2000 | www.kimley-horn.com©2025 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 No.BYDATEISSUE BLOCKENGINEER(S) OF RECORDCONTRACTOR NOTEZONING INFORMATIONFLOOD HAZARD AREA NOTEBENCHMARK & BASIS OF BEARINGAPPLICABLE CODESIONNA SITE NUMBER: MN-0008INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE#XXXX.XXXX#012#013, #014 #015PROPERTY SURVEY / EXISTING CONDITIONS, SEE SHEET C1.0 - ALTA SURVEY (BY OTHERS)EV SITE ADDRESS:#012#013, #014 #015PROPERTY OWNER:XXXCONTACT: FIRST LASTPHONE:(###) ###-####EMAIL:XXXDRAWING INDEXCOUNTY:#016LATITUDE (NAD83):##.######LONGITUDE (NAD83):-##.######PERMITTING JURISDICTION:#020ZONING CLASS:#021CURRENT USE;COMMERCIALPROPOSED USE:COMMERCIALALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING APPLICABLE CODES:·MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE 2020·MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL CODE 2023·MINNESOTA MECHANICAL CODE 2020·MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 2020·MINNESOTA FIRE CODE 2020·MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE 2024NOTE:IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE CODE SHALL PREVAIL.BENCHMARK: ###.##' (NAVD ##)NOT TO SCALE·CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE INSTALL PER THE SIGNED AND THE SEALED SET OFDRAWINGS. ANY NECESSARY DEVIATIONS FROM THE DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTEDTHROUGH AN RFI REQUEST PROCESS WITH ENGINEERING FOR AN APPROVAL PRIOR TOCONTRACTOR PROCEEDING WITH A DEVIATION OF THE SIGNED AND SEALED SET OFDRAWINGS.·CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS, EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ONTHE JOB SITE THEN IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER (APN):#011CIVIL ENGINEER:KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONTACT: FIRST LAST, P.E.PHONE: (###) ###-####EMAIL: #133ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONTACT: FIRST LAST, P.E.PHONE: (###) ###-####EMAIL: #143PROGRAM MANAGER:KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC.CONTACT: JESS CAINPHONE: (984) 358-6005EMAIL: JESS.CAIN@KIMLEY-HORN.COMSITE INFORMATIONAERIAL MAPPROJECT DESCRIPTIONFOR REFERENCE ONLY DRAWINGSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCAUTION!!CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY PRESENCEAND EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIESPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.BASIS OF BEARING:THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUMOF 1988 (NAVD-88) AND THE HORIZONTAL DATUM SHALL BE THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF1983 (NAD-83) IN THE STATE PLANE OF #014 STATE PLANE, ZONE #030, US FOOT.NORTHTHE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN ZONE #040, AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; ZONE A, & ZONE AE, AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, AS GRAPHICALLY SHOWN ON FIRM MAP COMMUNITY PANELNUMBER 27053C0344F, EFFECTIVE DATE #042.THIS PLAN IS DEVELOPED WITH THE INTENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)CHARGING STATIONS AND AN ELEVATED LIT CANOPY AT THIS LOCATION. THE EXTENT OFDESIGN WITHIN THIS CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT INCLUDES THE EV CHARGING STATIONSAND THEIR ACCOMPANYING CIVIL AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.·DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SURFACES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF EV CHARGERSAND LIT CANOPY.·GRADING OF SURFACES ASSOCIATED WITH EVSE TO COMPLY WITH ADAREQUIREMENTS.·INSTALL (#600) UTILITY TRANSFORMER TO BE COORDINATED WITH LOCAL UTILITYCOMPANY.·INSTALL (#620) SWITCHBOARD ASSEMBLY.·INSTALL (#630) 400KW ALPITRONIC HYC400 EV CHARGERS.·INSTALL (#511) EV SIGN POSTS.·INSTALL (#512) ACCESSIBLE EV SIGN POSTS.SITEIMAGE REFERENCEAERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BYNEARMAP US, INC. ©2025 NEARMAP, HERE.SURVEYOR:#110CONTACT: FIRST LAST, R.L.S.PHONE: (###) ###-####EMAIL: #113POWER COMPANY:#160CONTACT: FIRST LASTPHONE: (###) ###-####EMAIL: #163G0.0COVER SHEET Page 687 of 746 N/ADESIGNED AND PROVIDED BY OTHERS DATEAS SHOWNSHEET NUMBER CHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT#00212/17/2025This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.#012#013, #014 #015SITE NO.: #XXXX.XXXXN/AN/ATHIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC SITE: #012, #013, #014, AND IS VALID ONLY AS OF ITS ISSUE DATE (12/17/2025). IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON ANY OTHER PROJECT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. ANY USE OF THIS PLAN AS A REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT REQUIRES THE INVOLVEMENT OF APPROPRIATELY LICENSED ENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THIS PLAN FOR ANOTHER PROJECT IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY VIOLATE APPLICABLE LAWS. STIPULATION FOR REUSE 421 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601 Main: (919) 677-2000 | www.kimley-horn.com ©2025 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.012345678No.BYDATEISSUE BLOCKNOT TO SCALE FOR REFERENCE ONLY C1.0ALTA SURVEY (BY OTHERS)Page 688 of 746 CCS 1A CCS 1B CCS 2A CCS 2B CCS 3A CCS 3B CCS 4A CCS 4B NACS 1A NACS 1B NACS 3BNACS 3ANACS 2BNACS 2ACONSTRUCTION NOTES PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES DESCRIPTIONITEM CIVIL SITE PLAN LEGEND PARKING STRIPING (SEE PLANS FOR REVISED PARKING LAYOUT) CONCRETE PAD / RESTORE CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT STRIPED ISLAND REGRADE AND RESTORE PERVIOUS / LANDSCAPE AREA RESTORE CONCRETE CURBING 1.SEE PAVING AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES ON SHEET G1.0 AND G1.1. 2.CONTRACTOR TO BORE AND / OR HAND-TRENCH CONDUIT AS REQUIRED PER NEC. 3.ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CLIENT DESIGN STANDARDS. 4.CONTRACTOR TO RETURN ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AND UP TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS. 5.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE FIELD MEASUREMENTS OR OTHERWISE ESTABLISH A SURVEY OF THE EXISTING STRIPING IN ALL WORK AREAS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITH FULL COORDINATION OF NEW MARKINGS PROPOSED ON THIS PLAN. 2.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS PLAN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR ALL FIRE LANES, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, STOP BARS, CURBS, SIDEWALK, LIGHT POLE BASES, SIGN BASES AND PARKING STALLS TO MATCH THE EXISTING SITE WITHIN THE REPAIR LIMITS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO USE APPROPRIATE PAINT COLORS TO MATCH THE EXISTING FEATURES. ADA BARRIER FREE AREAS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS. PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE A HIGH QUALITY PAINT RECOMMENDED BY THE PAINT MANUFACTURER. PAINT COLORS SHALL CLOSELY MATCH THE FEDERAL STANDARD 595B COLOR NUMBER AS FOLLOWS: BLUE-COLOR 15180, WHITE-COLOR 37925 AND YELLOW-COLOR 33538. 4.IN AREAS NOT BEING RESURFACED BUT REQUIRING RESTRIPING, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING STRIPING BY EITHER SAND BLASTING, WATER BLASTING, OR BY ANOTHER APPROVED METHOD OF STRIPING REMOVAL. WHERE THE STRIPING REMOVAL CHANGES THE SURFACE TEXTURE OF THE EXISTING ASPHALT, CONTRACTOR SHALL SEAL COAT THE AREA PRIOR TO RESTRIPING. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT STRIPING REMOVAL METHOD TO PROPERTY MANAGER AND ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. RELOCATED TREE SIGN POST SCREENING FENCE SITE SUMMARY PROPERTY AREA:16,552.8 SF (0.38 AC) PARKING EXISTING PARKING IMPACTED:NA PROPOSED PARKING:14 STALLS NET PARKING STALL CHANGE:14 STALLS L3 NACS: 6 STALLS EV ADA REQ VAN:0 STALLS STD: 6 STALLS L3 CCS: 8 STALLS EV ADA REQ VAN: 1 STALLS STD: 7 STALLS MILL AND OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT AT 1.5" DEPTH DATEAS SHOWNSHEET NUMBER CHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT#00212/17/2025This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.#012#013, #014 #015SITE NO.: #XXXX.XXXX#910#911#912THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC SITE: #012, #013, #014, AND IS VALID ONLY AS OF ITS ISSUE DATE (12/17/2025). IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON ANY OTHER PROJECT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. ANY USE OF THIS PLAN AS A REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT REQUIRES THE INVOLVEMENT OF APPROPRIATELY LICENSED ENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THIS PLAN FOR ANOTHER PROJECT IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY VIOLATE APPLICABLE LAWS. STIPULATION FOR REUSE 421 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601 Main: (919) 677-2000 | www.kimley-horn.com ©2025 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.012345678No.BYDATEISSUE BLOCKNORTH 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET WHEN PRINTED AT FULL SIZE (24"x36") 10510 20 SCALE: 1" = 10' C2.0SITE PLANAREA 'A' AREA 'B' Page 689 of 746 CONSTRUCTION NOTES PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES DESCRIPTIONITEM CIVIL SITE PLAN LEGEND PARKING STRIPING (SEE PLANS FOR REVISED PARKING LAYOUT) CONCRETE PAD / RESTORE CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT STRIPED ISLAND REGRADE AND RESTORE PERVIOUS / LANDSCAPE AREA RESTORE CONCRETE CURBING 1.SEE PAVING AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES ON SHEET G1.0 AND G1.1. 2.CONTRACTOR TO BORE AND / OR HAND-TRENCH CONDUIT AS REQUIRED PER NEC. 3.ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CLIENT DESIGN STANDARDS. 4.CONTRACTOR TO RETURN ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AND UP TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS. 5.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE FIELD MEASUREMENTS OR OTHERWISE ESTABLISH A SURVEY OF THE EXISTING STRIPING IN ALL WORK AREAS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITH FULL COORDINATION OF NEW MARKINGS PROPOSED ON THIS PLAN. 2.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS PLAN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR ALL FIRE LANES, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, STOP BARS, CURBS, SIDEWALK, LIGHT POLE BASES, SIGN BASES AND PARKING STALLS TO MATCH THE EXISTING SITE WITHIN THE REPAIR LIMITS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO USE APPROPRIATE PAINT COLORS TO MATCH THE EXISTING FEATURES. ADA BARRIER FREE AREAS TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS. PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE A HIGH QUALITY PAINT RECOMMENDED BY THE PAINT MANUFACTURER. PAINT COLORS SHALL CLOSELY MATCH THE FEDERAL STANDARD 595B COLOR NUMBER AS FOLLOWS: BLUE-COLOR 15180, WHITE-COLOR 37925 AND YELLOW-COLOR 33538. 4.IN AREAS NOT BEING RESURFACED BUT REQUIRING RESTRIPING, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING STRIPING BY EITHER SAND BLASTING, WATER BLASTING, OR BY ANOTHER APPROVED METHOD OF STRIPING REMOVAL. WHERE THE STRIPING REMOVAL CHANGES THE SURFACE TEXTURE OF THE EXISTING ASPHALT, CONTRACTOR SHALL SEAL COAT THE AREA PRIOR TO RESTRIPING. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT STRIPING REMOVAL METHOD TO PROPERTY MANAGER AND ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. RELOCATED TREE SIGN POST SCREENING FENCE SITE SUMMARY PROPERTY AREA:16,552.8 SF (0.38 AC) PARKING EXISTING PARKING IMPACTED:NA PROPOSED PARKING:14 STALLS NET PARKING STALL CHANGE:14 STALLS L3 NACS: 6 STALLS EV ADA REQ VAN:0 STALLS STD: 6 STALLS L3 CCS: 8 STALLS EV ADA REQ VAN: 1 STALLS STD: 7 STALLS MILL AND OVERLAY EXISTING ASPHALT AT 1.5" DEPTH CCS 1A CCS 1B CCS 2A CCS 2B CCS 3A CCS 3B CCS 4A CCS 4B NACS 1A NACS 1B NACS 3BNACS 3ANACS 2BNACS 2APROPOSED EV PARKING SIGN (TYP. 4) PROPOSED LEVEL 3 DUAL PORT CHARGER ON A 5' X 5' CONCRETE PAD TO BE MOUNTED WITH FLUSH CURB (TYP. 2) PROPOSED LEVEL 3 DUAL PORT CHARGER ON A 5' X 5' CONCRETE PAD TO BE MOUNTED WITH FLUSH CURB (TYP. 5) PROPOSED EV PARKING SIGN (TYP. 9) PROPOSED VAN ACCESSIBLE EV PARKING SIGN (TYP. 1) PROPOSED 6" HEADER CURB PROPOSED 6" HEADER CURB (±105 SF) PROPOSED 6" HEADER CURB PROPOSED LANDSCAPE (±315SF) PROPOSED TRANSFORMER ON CONCRETE PAD (LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED WITH LOCAL UTILITY PROVIDER) PROPOSED REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP. 18) 6" WHITE PAVEMENT MARKING AT 45 DEG O.C. (TYP.) 6" WHITE PAVEMENT MARKING AT 45 DEG O.C. (TYP.) 6" WHITE PAVEMENT MARKING AT 45 DEG O.C. (TYP.) PROPOSED LANDSCAPE (±140SF) PROPOSED PET WASTE STATION PROPOSED TRASH CAN AND WINDOW WASHING STATION (TYP. 4) EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED CURB TO TIE INTO EXISTING PROPOSED MILL & OVERLAY (±1245 SF) PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (±1006 SF) PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (±1280 SF) PROPOSED MILL & OVERLAY (±120 SF) PROPOSED MILL & OVERLAY (±180 SF) PROPOSED MILL & OVERLAY (±3135 SF) PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (±360 SF) PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (±1010 SF) R5.5' R3' R3' PROPOSED CURB TO TIE INTO EXISTING PROPOSED LANDSCAPE (±260 SF) PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT (±330 SF) PROPOSED EMERGENCY SHUTOFF DATEAS SHOWNSHEET NUMBER CHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT01689511912/17/2025This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.6016 Vernon Ave S.EDINA, MN 55436SITE NO.: MN-0008 EDINA, MNKARKAREGSTHIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC SITE: 6016 VERNON AVE S., EDINA, MN, AND IS VALID ONLY AS OF ITS ISSUE DATE (12/17/2025). IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON ANY OTHER PROJECT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. ANY USE OF THIS PLAN AS A REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT REQUIRES THE INVOLVEMENT OF APPROPRIATELY LICENSED ENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THIS PLAN FOR ANOTHER PROJECT IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY VIOLATE APPLICABLE LAWS. STIPULATION FOR REUSE 11995 SINGLETREE LANE, SUITE 225, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 Main: (612) 315-1272 | www.kimley-horn.com ©2025 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.012345678No.BYDATEISSUE BLOCKNORTH 0 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET WHEN PRINTED AT FULL SIZE (24"x36") ##### 1" = #' C2.1ENLARGED SITE PLANAREA 'A' AREA 'B' Page 690 of 746 2500AT 3000AF 3P RELT MAIN SWITCHBOARD 'MSB-1', 3000A, 480Y/277V, 3P, 4W, NEMA 3R, 65kAIC GROUND FAULT PROTECTION, HUMIDISTAT & SPACE HEATER, SUN SHIELD HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH AFC: TBD HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH 1 2 3 MAIN BREAKER SECTION UTILITY METERING COMPARTMENT HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH 4 5 HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH 6 HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH 15AT 15AF 1P 30AT 30AF 3P 15AT 15AF 1P 15AT 15AF 1P SPD SPARE 7 M HYC400 400KW 480V / 3PH SECTION 2SECTION 1 N 500 KCMIL CU PER NEC 250.102(C)(1) GFP TRIP (IF REQUIRED) G #4 CU PER NEC 250.66(B) CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT #6 CU 5/8" X 8' GROUND ROD #6 CU 5/8" X 8' GROUND ROD IF GROUNDING SYSTEM HAS GREATER THAN 25Ω OF RESISTANCE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL GROUND RODS, SPACED AT LEAST 8' APART, ONE AT A TIME UNTIL GROUND RESISTANCE IS 25Ω OR LESS 600AT 600AF 3P PRIMARY LINE TO BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND METER PEDESTAL PER UTILITY STANDARDS PROPOSED UTILITY GROUND PROPOSED UTILITY SERVICE UTILITY TRANSFORMER PRIMARY VOLTAGE: PER UTILITY SECONDARY: 480Y/277V CT PROVIDED BY UTILITY & INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR SWITCHBOARD ORIENTATION IS LEFT TO RIGHT SEE G2.0 FOR CHARGER SPECIFICATIONS 600AT 600AF 3P 600AT 600AF 3P 600AT 600AF 3P 600AT 600AF 3P 600AT 600AF 3P 600AT 600AF 3P SITE COMMS BOX TO ISP POINT OF INTERCONNECTION (FIELD VERIFY) SPD 3.0 KVA STEP DOWN TRANSFORMER PRI: 277V, 1PH, 2W SEC: 120V, 1PH, 2W NO SECONDARY OVERCURRENT PROTECTION REQUIRED PER NEC 240.21(C)(2) (8) 137W LIGHT FIXTURES APPROX 140' APPROX 195' APPROX 250' APPROX 205' APPROX 220' APPROX 225' APPROX 165'DATEAS SHOWNSHEET NUMBER CHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT#00212/17/2025This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.#012#013, #014 #015SITE NO.: #XXXX.XXXX#900#901#902THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED FOR USE ON A SPECIFIC SITE: #012, #013, #014, AND IS VALID ONLY AS OF ITS ISSUE DATE (12/17/2025). IT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON ANY OTHER PROJECT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. ANY USE OF THIS PLAN AS A REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTHER PROJECT REQUIRES THE INVOLVEMENT OF APPROPRIATELY LICENSED ENGINEERS. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THIS PLAN FOR ANOTHER PROJECT IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY VIOLATE APPLICABLE LAWS. STIPULATION FOR REUSE 421 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600, RALEIGH, NC 27601 Main: (919) 677-2000 | www.kimley-horn.com ©2025 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.012345678No.BYDATEISSUE BLOCKPENDING UTILITY DESIGN E2.0SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMLOAD SUMMARY NOTE 1.ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING LOADS ARE PART OF AUTOMATIC LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PER NEC 625.42. CHARGING LOADS WILL BE LIMITED TO THE VALUES SHOWN IN THE PANEL SCHEDULE AND THE TOTAL LOAD SHALL NOT EXCEED MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER LONG TIME SETTING RATING OF SWITCHBOARD 'EV' NOR THE UTILITY TRANSFORMER. WIRE AND CONDUIT SCHEDULE NOTES 1.CONDUIT SIZE INDICATED ON SCHEDULE ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED SIZES. LARGER SIZES MAY BE INSTALLED AS NEEDED. WIRE AND CONDUIT SCHEDULE SWITCHBOARD LOAD SCHEDULE UTILITY INFORMATION 1.METER PLACEMENT, CT CABINET, AND FINAL SWITCH BOARD/DISTRIBUTION DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED ACCORDING TO UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE METER SOCKET (METER ENCLOSURE) PER LISTED ON THE UTILITY'S APPROVED METER ENCLOSURE LIST. 2.THE MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER IN THIS SWITCHBOARD SHALL BE 100% RATED. 3.PROVIDE GROUND FAULT PROTECTION (GFP) FOR EQUIPMENT PER NEC ARTICLE 230.95. 4.SEE UTILITY POWER MANUAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 5.THIS SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE FIELD MARKED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS STATED IN NEC ARTICLES 110.24(A) AND 230.70(B). 6.WHEN REQUIRED BY LOCAL AHJ "BREAK GLASS IN CASE OF FIRE" SWITCH IS TO BEPROVIDED BY EC. SWITCH SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO PILLA ST120SN3RSL-EMERGENCY SHUT DOWN: EMERGENCY BREAK GLASS STATION, LEGEND: "EMERGENCY SHUT-DOWN", NO PUSH BUTTON, AUTO-RELEASE WHEN GLASS BROKEN, SURFACE MOUNT NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE, FITS 1-6 CONTACT BLOCKS OR EQUIVALENT. 7.PER NEC 625.42 IONNA IS SUPPLYING AUTOMATIC LOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THIS SITE. 8.ALL CONDUITS ABOVE GROUND OR SUBJECT TO DAMAGE SHALL BE RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL. ALL CONDUITS UNDERGROUND SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 9.INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST ADOPTED NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 27. THE AHJ HAS FINAL JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY ON CODE APPLICATION AND COMPLIANCE. 10.ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE IN NEW CONDITION AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 11.ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UL LISTED. 12.ALL SWITCHBOARDS AND PANELBOARDS SHALL HAVE ARC FLASH WARNING LABELS WITH APPLICABLE INCIDENT ENERGY LEVELS, WORKING DISTANCES, AND REQUIRED PPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 70E. 13.EXPOSED NON-CURRENT CARRYING METAL PARTS OF EQUIPMENT AND ENCLOSURES SHALL BE GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEC 250.134 AND 250.136. SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM NOTES IONNA SITE ELECTRICAL INFORMATION SITE ZIP CODE:55436 UTILITY NAME:XCEL ENERGY UTILITY CONTACT:KIERAN SCHWARTZ UTILITY CONTACT (PN):612-494-4271 UTILITY CONTACT (EM):KIERAN.E.SCHWARTZ@XCELENERGY.COM IONNA QUANTITY OF CHARGERS:7 IONNA LOAD FLA (A):3360 IONNA LOAD (60% MANAGED) (A):2016 UTILITY XFMR SIZING (KVA):2000 UTILITY XFMR CONFIGURATION DELTA-WYE UTILITY SCA:ESTIMATED @ 5% Z= 48,112 UTILITY METERING SEQUENCE:HOT UTILITY XFMR SEC CONDUCTOR:9 SETS OF 600 KCMIL AL UTILITY XFMR SEC CONDUIT:4" CHARGER FEEDER CONDUCTOR:2 SETS OF 500 KCMIL AL CHARGER FEEDER CONDUIT:3" Panel Schedule Panel 'MSB-1', Location: Minneapolis, Voltage: 480Y/277, Phase: 3, Wire: 4, Hertz: 60 Main AIC: 65K, Branch AIC: 65K, Enclosure: (NEMA 3R) 3000 Amp Frame, Ground Fault Protection, Humidstat, Space Heater, Sun Shield Description of Load Served Breaker A/Phase CKT No.CKT No. A/Phase Breaker Description of Load Served Amp Pole A B C A B C Amp Pole EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #1 600 3 480.0 1 2 480.0 600 3 EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #2480.0 3 4 480.0 480.0 5 6 480.0 EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #3 600 3 480.0 7 8 480.0 600 3 EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #4480.0 9 10 480.0 480.0 11 12 480.0 EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #5 600 3 480.0 13 14 480.0 600 3 EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #6480.0 15 16 480.0 480.0 17 18 480.0 EVCS DUAL PORT DISPENSER #7 600 3 480.0 19 20 10.8 15 1 3.0 KVA XFMR 480.0 21 22 - 30 3 SPD480.0 23 24 - 25 26 - 27 28 -15 1 SPARE 29 30 4.0 15 1 SITE LIGHTING Total A/Phase:3360.0 3360.0 3364.0 NOTES:1. CONNECTED KVA (NEW):2796.8 2. DEMAND KVA (NEW):1678.1 SEE NOTE 1 BELOW CONDUIT AND WIRING SCHEDULE ID FROM TO CONDUCTORS 1 PROPOSED UTILITY TRANSFORMER (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD (3) 600 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #1/0 AWG NEUTRAL AL (THWN-2) IN EACH OF (9) 4" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 45' 2 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 140' 3 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 165' 4 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 195' 5 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 225' 6 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 250' 7 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 220' 8 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD PROPOSED HYC400 POWER CABINET (3) 500 KCMIL AL (THWN-2) + (1) #2/0 AWG AL (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN EACH OF (2) 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUITS APPROX 205' 9 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD 3.0 KVA STEP DOWN TRANSFORMER (2) #12 AWG CU (THWN-2) + (1) #12 AWG CU (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN (1) 3/4" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT 10 3.0 KVA STEP DOWN TRANSFORMER SITE COMMS BOX (2) #10 AWG CU (THWN-2) + (1) #10 AWG CU (THWN-2) JUMPER IN (1) 3/4" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT 11 PROPOSED 480V SWITCHBOARD SITE LIGHTING (2) #12 AWG CU (THWN-2) + (1) #12 AWG CU (THWN-2) GROUNDING IN (1) 1" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT 12 ISP POINT OF CONNECTION (FIELD LOCATE)SITE COMMS BOX (1) 1" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT FOR ISP FIBER OPTIC CABLE Page 691 of 746 7/25/2022 9:39:49 AM \\10.1.10.15\share\Dropbox\CD Architecture\CDA-2021.17-6016 VERNON AVE\02 REVIT\202117_MAIN MODEL_R19.rvtPage 692 of 746 EdinaMN.gov 6016 Vernon Avenue – EV Charging Station Sketch Plane Page Style Page 693 of 746 Zoning Map & Site Location Site Location Page 694 of 746 Land Use Map & Site Location Site Location Page 695 of 746 Formal Application would Require A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to re-guide the site from MDR, Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Node. The site is zoned PCD-4, in which a gas station is a permitted use. A gas station is defined as “a principal building and its accessory structures used for the sale of motor fuels and oils, where automotive accessories and convenience goods may be sold, but where repair and servicing of motor vehicles does not occur; provided, however, that an accessory carwash is permitted.” Site Plan Review. Multiple Variances: Drive Aisle/Parking Space Setbacks, Setback to Residential Property, Canopy setbacks, Pump Island Setbacks, and Parking Lot Setback from the Building. Page 696 of 746 Land Use Description for Neighborhood Node Page 697 of 746 Sites Guided NN with Gas Station or Auto Repair 2 Sites Former Site 1 Site Page 698 of 746 Proposed Site Plan Page 699 of 746 Example Building Renderings Page 700 of 746 Floor Plan Page 701 of 746 Zoning Ordinance Compliance Table Page 702 of 746 IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 703 of 746 WHO WE ARE OUR MISSION IONNA was born from auto manufacturers to build a nationwide charging network that thinks of the customer first. Give drivers the: •Network Coverage they need, •Reliability they deserve, •Amenities they crave. IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 704 of 746 60% SHARE TODAY 8 Founding Automakers Market-Making Capital Interoperability from Development BMW | GENERAL MOTORS | HONDA | HYUNDAI | KIA MERCEDES-BENZ | STELLANTIS | TOYOTA IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 705 of 746 Network Today IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 706 of 746 IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 707 of 746 The IONNA Experience Network Amenities -400 kW EVSE power-shared dual-port units -10-12 charging bays per site -800+ bays live today -4,000+ bays contracted 30,000 charging bays by end of 2030 Basics Public Facing Fast Charging Pitstop with Purpose -Restrooms -Food/Beverage Access -Wi-Fi -Canopies & Lighting -More! Nationwide Connectivity IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 708 of 746 zzto all makes, models, and forms of payment Native NACS (Tesla) and CCS connectors installed in all locations. 100% Open & compatible with all other brands on the road. •Vehicle Auto-Charge/Plug- &-Charge •Pay-by-Phone … Payment Accepting all forms of non-cash payment. •Credit Cards •Automaker Apps (integrated) •Other Network Apps (Roaming) No Matter what Plug … Vehicle WE IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 709 of 746 IONNA Rechargery IONNA CONFIDENTIAL •14 fast-charging bays open to the public 24/7 (400kW dual-port) •Branded dispenser & canopies •Trash-cans/window cleaning /air pressure/pet features by IONNA •Retrofitting existing building to provide driver lounge, restrooms, and vending or retail – this could be tailored to local community needs and we would be excited to work with a local business to provide this service if desired Page 710 of 746 IONNA Rechargery IONNA CONFIDENTIAL •14 fast-charging bays open to the public 24/7 (400kW dual-port) •Branded dispenser & canopies •Trash-cans/window cleaning /air pressure/pet features by IONNA •Retrofitting existing building to provide driver lounge, restrooms, and vending or retail – this could be tailored to local community needs and we would be excited to work with a local business to provide this service if desired Page 711 of 746 IONNA CONFIDENTIAL IONNA Rechargery •14 fast-charging bays open to the public 24/7 (400kW dual-port) •Branded dispenser & canopies •Trash-cans/window cleaning /air pressure/pet features by IONNA •Retrofitting existing building to provide driver lounge, restrooms, and vending or retail – this could be tailored to local community needs and we would be excited to work with a local business to provide this service if desired Page 712 of 746 IONNA CONFIDENTIAL IONNA Rechargery •14 fast-charging bays open to the public 24/7 (400kW dual-port) •Branded dispenser & canopies •Trash-cans/window cleaning /air pressure/pet features by IONNA •Retrofitting existing building to provide driver lounge, restrooms, and vending or retail – this could be tailored to local community needs and we would be excited to work with a local business to provide this service if desired Page 713 of 746 IONNA CONFIDENTIAL IONNA Rechargery •14 fast-charging bays open to the public 24/7 (400kW dual-port) •Branded dispenser & canopies •Trash-cans/window cleaning /air pressure/pet features by IONNA •Retrofitting existing building to provide driver lounge, restrooms, and vending or retail – this could be tailored to local community needs and we would be excited to work with a local business to provide this service if desired Page 714 of 746 IONNA CONFIDENTIAL IONNA Rechargery Page 715 of 746 How IONNA's Vision Aligns with City of Edina -Investment: Bringing $1-2 million investment per site to your area in public infrastructure that aligns with Edina's goals to create a more livable City with reliable services for the public -Jobs: Hiring local maintenance and EV technicians -Sustainability: This public infrastructure will enable more drivers to make the shift to electric vehicles, in alignment with the City's goals to reduce greenhouse gases and bolster the health of the community through improved air-quality. -Press: Opportunities to highlight new service in town, potential for ribbon-cutting, inclusion in Xcel Energy press event scheduled for February. IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 716 of 746 Emily Belding Utility & Policy Engagement Associate 919.356.0596 | emily.belding@ionna.com IONNA CONFIDENTIAL Page 717 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.6 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager, Zoe Johnson, City Management Fellow Item Title: Adopt 2026 Legislative Platforms Action Requested: Adopt the state and federal 2026 legislative platforms. Information/Background: The identification of state and federal legislation that might be changed to better achieve the goals of the City and the broader Edina community is something that occurs each year. In the same vein, as City staff work with colleagues and partners to identify policy changes necessary to achieve those goals, they also work to propose changes to said policy that may be working contrary to City goals — ultimately limiting the livelihood and progress of the broader Edina community. While legislative sessions occur each year, legislative changes can take years to occur. Issues are debated, modified, and could still be unsuccessful — this is why it is crucial to start the conversation early with the understanding that details will be fine-tuned throughout the legislative process. As the City finalizes the specifics within our 2026 legislative platforms, so do associations such as the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC), Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (Metro Cities), the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), and the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association (MCPA). Oftentimes, Edina's interests align with these associations both by virtue of the City's participation in each association and their guiding purpose. The City's 2026 legislative platforms do not duplicate items found on the MLC, Metro Cities, LMC, or MCPA platforms, but it does assume general alignment with these partner associations. The two types of items that make up the state legislative platform are priorities and positions. Priorities are issues specific to Edina and do not directly affect other communities; positions are issues affecting cities in general and are not specific to Edina. Anything that was removed from the platform was either approved or addressed by last year's state legislative session, or has been morphed into a new priority/position. Resources/Financial Impacts: No fiscal impact to prepare and adopt these legislative platforms. Capacity impact is minimal for staff to update legislative platforms each year. Relationship to City Policies/Plans/Budget Pillars: The legislative platforms largely relate to city code, the city budget, a large majority of city work plans, the Comprehensive Plan, the Capital Improvement Plan, the Climate Action Plan, the Safe and Equitable Mobility Action Plan, and the Living Streets Plan and Policy. Page 718 of 746 Values Impact: Supporting Documentation: Documents marked with "Board Portal" do not meet ADA Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (URL) and are not included in the public packet. To request a board portal document, please submit a data request (URL). 1. City of Edina 2026 Federal Platform 2. City of Edina 2026 State Platform Page 719 of 746 Memo Administration EdinaMN.gov Date: January 20, 2026 To: Mayor & City Council From: Scott Neal, City Manager; Zoe Johnson, City Management Fellow Subject: 2026 Federal Legislative Platform 1. Affordable Housing Supplying affordable housing to all Minnesotans is an important investment to make for the state’s future. Unfortunately, the funding available falls far short of what is needed. Cities cannot close the housing affordability gap on their own. The City urges Congress to increase the allocation to Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), restore HOME and CDBG funding, and prioritize affordable housing and work with local partners to coordinate federal housing resources. The City urges Congress to increase support for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnership (HOME) program, the Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance Program and the Emergency Food and Shelter program. These programs are the principal source of federal revenue for localities to use in developing and implementing community development solutions, such as affordable housing, that create and sustain healthy, functioning communities. These funds also serve to help prevent homelessness which is far safer for a City and more economical than moving a household out of homelessness. Additionally, in 2023 the State of Minnesota recognized a “right to heating” in winter to protect the comfort, safety, and well-being of renters and low-income Minnesotans, along with additional tenant protections. The City urges Congress to adopt similar standards nationwide, including rights to both heating and to cooling, along with additional funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). Bills such as the Heating and Cooling Relief Act (S.405/H.R.893) not only would allow LIHEAP to assist more households but also reduce both utility bills and building emissions via expanded weatherization programs. 2. Climate Change The City approved its Climate Action Plan in December 2021, setting a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by 2030. The plan includes 200 actions to meet our climate action goals, and the City has already started or completed over 30 percent of these critical actions and has benefitted from federal legislation and funding. For example, the City received a $200,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Safe Streets and Roads for All program to create a consolidated safe and equitable transportation plan, combining existing pedestrian and bike master plans and new plans, like a roadway safety plan. Goals of this plan will include reductions in vehicle miles traveled and increased multi-modal transit ridership and service. While the City continues to lead local climate change efforts, federal assistance helps us meet our goals more quickly and efficiently, particularly those concerning transportation and the greenhouse gas effects of the transportation industry. First, we ask for increased investment in high-speed passenger rail in the Midwest. The Twin Cities were prioritized for more frequent service to Chicago, and the City is eager to keep this prioritization, but we also seek high-speed rail connections to reduce short-haul flights in the Midwest. The City applauds the $500,000 of federal funding allocated to the planning of the Northern Lights Express project and looks forward to continued investment in the Midwest’s passenger rail network. Page 720 of 746 Second, we ask for the reinstatement of federal clean energy tax credits to their original value and expiration dates, as approved in the Inflation Reduction Act. These credits are crucial to helping homeowners, businesses, and government agencies invest in clean energy technologies like solar panels, heat pumps and electric vehicles (EV). Third, we ask for support for transit system operations, like the Stronger Communities Through Better Transit Act (H.R.7039). Edina seeks to double its transit ridership by 2030, and operations funding can help Metro Transit increase service to suburban communities, increasing access, and increasing ridership opportunities. Finally, we ask that Congress declare a climate emergency. This recognition would open additional sources of funding and mobilization of resources that would empower federal, state, and local governments to better prepare for and mitigate the consequences of climate change. 3. Enable Cities to Protect Residents from Harmful Levels of Aviation Noise The City identified aviation noise as a key threat to the quality of life in Edina. The City requests support from Edina’s federally elected officials for eliminating Categorical Exclusions (CATEX) when implementing Performance Based Navigation (PBN). The process should ensure that ground impacts and community concerns are incorporated into PBN that will change noise exposure. Regarding measuring noise, Day/Night Noise Level (DNL) is an average and humans perceive noise as individual events, rather than averages, so we believe it is time to investigate alternative metrics. The City is concerned about the impacts from the increased number and frequency of flights under traditional PBN tracks. There is currently very little information pertaining to the human impact of the concentration of flights associated with PBN procedures. Our residents are exposed to continuous concentrated noise due to our proximity to the airport. Although there may not be an increase in average noise as measured by DNL, there are unknown impacts from the increased number and frequency of flights. Given the age of some Sound Insulation Programs (SIP) in the United States, the increase in traffic density at our nation’s airports and improved technologies, the Edina City Council supports the eligibility standards used prior to the September 2012 Program Guidance Letter (PGL-12-09). The Edina City Council opposes the privatization of Air Traffic Control. We are concerned it may reduce the accountability of the organization to Congress, and that without a mechanism for compelling private companies to meet and discuss community concerns, there will be fewer opportunities for advocacy on noise impacts. The FAA has taken positive steps to improve community engagement, including adopting a Community Involvement Manual and hiring a Community Involvement Manager for Airspace Projects. The Edina City Council believes that this will result in a more efficient and successful implementation of NextGen, and we strongly support these efforts. 4. Post Office Preservation The Edina Post Office in the 50th & France District, at 3948 Market Street, is housed in a leased facility. The Edina Post Office is important to the Edina, Minneapolis and St. Louis Park residents it serves. We ask your support in keeping a full-service post office in the 50th & France District and to initiate the planning process for a new post office within the next 24 months. 5. Protection of Municipal Bonds The City’s Aaa and AAA credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Services are a source of community pride and represent the financial strength of our city. These ratings create opportunities for the City to invest in our community’s future and provide the best value in public services back to our residents. It is the combination of local control and local responsibility that makes municipal bonds such an effective and efficient tool. Any changes to the tax code should recognize the vital role of tax-exempt municipal bonds. The City asks you to oppose any Page 721 of 746 attempt to make changes to the tax-exempt status that would increase the cost of financing for cities as doing so would impact our operations, our services and, ultimately, our residents. 6. Railroad Safety The City has one railroad that runs through the center of Edina, with two trains running daily on the tracks, and there are numerous other tracks within a 10-mile radius. The City supports legislation to mitigate negative safety concerns, noise, and environmental impacts of railroads and to increase communications with first responders for municipal emergency response to non-rail incidents and rail incidents. Such legislation includes the Railway Safety Act of 2023 (S.576). These measures are needed as the number and length of trains in the state and metro area are increasing, and as recent derailments, such as the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) train derailment in Raymond, Minnesota, highlight the risk that rail poses to communities. Rail is an essential part of the national economy and reduces impacts on other infrastructure, so it must be maintained and operated safely in communities. 7. Public Safety The City operates a police department that includes sworn peace officers, a 911 dispatch division and community engagement functions. As with many communities in the Twin Cities, recruitment and retention of police officers, violent crime, and fentanyl overdoses remain enduring issues. The City supports initiatives like Community Violence Intervention (CVI) programs and the Safer America Plan. These proactive strategies are making a tangible difference in community safety across the nation, through their focus on neighborhood safety, intervention and support before violent crimes take place, and recruiting and retaining skilled and dedicated police officers. The City urges continued support of programs like these, through the Congressional action laid out in the Safer America Plan. The City finds that there is a public safety and welfare crisis resulting from gun violence in the City. The City has requested the State of Minnesota to lift broad firearm preemption laws that specifically prohibit local governments from adopting reasonable gun laws tailored to local conditions, and asks the City’s federal elected officials support the City in this advocacy to restore local authority to empower cities like Edina to protect residents and reduce gun violence. The State of Minnesota’s firearm preemption prevents local elected officials and police chiefs – the officials most familiar with local criminal activity and how to address it – from passing common sense public safety measures designed to keep their communities safe. 8. Clarity on THC-Infused Products With the passage of Minn. Stat. 151.72 in July 2022, products containing THC are permitted for sale. The City seeks clarification on whether retail liquor stores can sell THC-infused beverages for two main purposes. First, without federal passage of the SAFE banking act, cannabis-related legitimate operations cannot generate proceeds from unlawful activity, and banking institutions can be penalized by federal authorities for providing services to a cannabis-related business. Also, current regulation allows retailers like Edina Liquor to accept credit card payments only if the percent of total revenue from THC products is less than 15%. 9. Condominium Affordability & Quality The City of Edina understands that residents across the nation are struggling to keep up with escalating prices for condominium insurance, association fees, and units themselves. Residents hold great concern over the dilapidated quality of infrastructure within these condominium units as well as the lack of accountability with condominium building owners and property management. The City supports efforts to alleviate these residents’ concerns, such as increased mandated transparency measures for condominium building owners and property management to allow residents a greater ability to understand and inquire about further cost increases related to their condominium units. Page 722 of 746 City of Edina Contact Information Scott Neal, City Manager, can be contacted regarding any of the legislative items found on this platform in addition to the staff listed above. Scott Neal can be reached at SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401. 1. Affordable Housing Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager: SHawkinson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-833-9578 2. Climate Change Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager: MBayer@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-1621 3. Enable Cities to Protect Residents from Harmful Levels of Aviation Noise Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 4. Post Office Preservation Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 5. Protection of Municipal Bonds Pa Thao, Director of Finance: PThao@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0420 6. Railroad Safety Chad Millner, Director of Public Works & City Engineer: CMillner@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0318 7. Public Safety Todd Milburn, Chief of Police: TMilburn@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0487 8. Clarity on THC-Infused Products Perry Vetter, Director of Parks & Recreation: PVetter@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0430 9. Condominium Affordability & Quality Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 Page 723 of 746 1 Memo Administration EdinaMN.gov Date: January 20, 2026 To: Mayor & City Council From: Scott Neal, City Manager; Zoe Johnson, City Management Fellow Subject: 2026 State Legislative Platform Priorities: The following five priorities are made up of issues specific to Edina and do not directly affect other communities. 1. Sales Tax Spending Authority Amendment for Regional Recreation and Public Safety The City’s current sales tax spending limit is $71 million. The spending limit is a result of two local referendums which approved the local sales tax in 2022 and again in 2023. The total projected revenue from the local sales tax over the approved 19-year time frame at the approved tax rate of 0.5% is $140 million. The City seeks additional local sales tax spending authority to make capital and infrastructure improvements to its large regionally significant parks and recreation facilities, including Braemar Park, Fred Richards Park, Edina Aquatic Center, Edina Art Center, Edinborough Park, Centennial Lakes Park and capital improvements for the City’s public safety facilities. The City’s request can be summarized as follows: • Increase the City’s approved spending by $4 million to cover construction related inflation costs at its two existing local sales tax funded projects at Braemar Arena and Fred Richards Park by amending the scope of the current eligible expense categories: design; architecture; scoping; estimating; engineering; construction; lease payments; HVAC commissioning; payroll and fringe benefit costs for City employees who perform direct work for the project(s); furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) for all elements of the project(s); and communications and community engagement for the project(s); and, • To authorize the City of Edina to host an additional local sales tax referendum during the 2026 general election to authorize local sales tax funding for the following major capital and infrastructure improvements: ▪ New Public Safety Facilities (design and construction): $25,000,000 ▪ Edinborough Park (CIP spending): $14,000,000 ▪ Centennial Lake Park (CIP spending): $8,000,000 ▪ Edina Art Center (tenant improvement costs): $6,000,000 ▪ Edina Aquatic Center (CIP spending): $8,000,000 ▪ Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse (design): $4,000,000 Given current rates of sales tax revenue collection, and the previously voter approved spending, there is sufficient revenue expected in the future to support this spending. Page 724 of 746 2 2. Fire Station 3/Municipal Campus Land Dedication The Vernon Avenue and Highway 100 Interchange Project is nearing completion. The project removes barriers and improves safety for all users with a focus on pedestrians and populations with mobility challenges. The project closed redundant MnDOT ramps creating unused public land that could be used for a much-needed Fire Station 3 and/or a municipal campus including a fire station in northeast Edina. The City is asking that the any surplus MnDOT land created upon completion of the interchange project in the area bordered by Vernon Avenue/West 50th Street, Grange Road, Eden Avenue, and marked Trunk Highway 100 be dedicated for use by the City of Edina as a fire station, a municipal campus, or both effective the day following final enactment. 3. Lift Firearm Preemption and Allow Local Regulation The City of Edina urges the Minnesota Legislature to lift the current preemption on local regulation of firearms. This change is critical to allow cities to address urgent public safety and welfare concerns related to gun violence in their own communities. Edina seeks the authority to regulate specific firearms and firearm modifications that pose an extraordinary risk to public safety – such as semi-automatic military-style assault weapons, ghost guns, large-capacity magazines, and binary triggers. These weapons and modifications are not commonly used for lawful self-defense but have a significantly higher capacity for causing mass injury and death compared to ordinary firearms. Local governments need flexibility to enact reasonable regulations tailored to their community’s needs to mitigate the harm caused by these weapons when used for unlawful purposes. Restoring local authority will empower cities like Edina to protect residents and reduce gun violence effectively. 4. Enabling Social Districts for Vibrant Commercial Corridors The City of Edina requests special legislation to enable the consideration and potential establishment of one or more Social Districts within its commercial business districts, including the 50th & France business district. As Edina businesses continue to compete with both regional retail hubs and the continued growth of online commerce, it is essential to explore innovative strategies that enhance the vibrancy and economic vitality of our brick-and-mortar commercial districts. Social District legislation would allow for the creation of designated areas where alcoholic beverages can be purchased from licensed establishments and consumed within clearly defined public and private spaces. This may encourage longer visits, increased foot traffic, and stronger community vitality —further distinguishing the business district as a unique destination for residents and visitors alike. This legislative authority should also allow a Social District within Edina to interact seamlessly with a similar district in a neighboring municipality, such as Minneapolis, for example in commercial districts that span two different municipalities like 50th & France. This cross-jurisdictional flexibility would enable both cities to collaboratively define district boundaries, coordinate implementation, and partner with local business associations to ensure responsible management. 5. Sales Tax Exemption for Projects in the Braemar Park Master Plan and Fred Richards Park Master Plan The City will use new local sales and use tax revenue to make improvements and expansions to Braemar Arena and Braemar Park and Fred Richards Park, as outlined in the Braemar Park Master Plan and Fred Richards Park Master Plan. The City will seek a sales tax exemption for the material and supplies purchased for the construction, reconstruction, upgrade, expansion, or remodeling of City facilities included in the Braemar Park Master Plan and the Fred Richards Park Master Plan. 6. Protect Municipal Employees with Enforcement Functions Many city employees and contractors are required to enforce administrative codes, rules, ordinances, and state laws as part of their job duties. Minnesota law recognizes the need to protect certain employees whose jobs make it more likely Page 725 of 746 3 they will be the target of assaults by escalating assault charges from fifth to fourth degree for the assaults of peace officers, firefighters, school officials, and “public employees with mandated duties.” However, employees such as code enforcement officials, utility operators, municipal liquor store clerks and others have similar enforcement functions. The City supports extending the existing protection to all public employees whose jobs require them to enforce administrative codes, rules, ordinances, and state laws as a part of their job because due to the enforcement function of their jobs, these public employees can be and have been subject to verbal assaults, threats, and physical violence. This would make the law more evenly applicable to all employees more likely to become target of assaults. Positions: The following 46 positions represent issues which apply to Edina and other Minnesota cities. These positions are grouped into six categories: General Government (pages 3-7), Municipal Liquor (pages 7-8), Affordable Housing (pages 8-9), Environment and Sustainability (pages 9-12), Transportation (pages 12-15) and Public Safety (page 15-16). 1. General Government 1. Realign Motor Vehicle Lease Sales Tax Allocation In 2015, state legislation reallocated $32 million of the sales tax collected from leased vehicles from the State's general fund, half to Greater Minnesota and half to metro counties through the County State Aid Highway Fund. To balance funding for transit and roads/bridges, the new law excluded Hennepin and Ramsey Counties from receiving their share of funding. Instead, the other five metro counties split the proceeds generated in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. With the elimination of the Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB) in 2017, all seven metro counties now collect their own local transportation sale tax, but the exemption still blocks Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. The City of Edina advocates for returning to the original intent by eliminating the exemption of Hennepin and Ramsey Counties and distributing the sales tax on lease vehicles, per the county state aid formula, to all metro counties. The City supports re- aligning the distribution because: • Distributing Hennepin and Ramsey County proceeds to the other five metro counties puts cities in Hennepin County at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing county funds for road and bridge projects. • This change would provide an estimated $10.7 million in additional funding to Hennepin County for roads and bridges. 2. Increase Purchasing Agency The City Manager is the chief purchasing agent of statutory Plan B cities. State law requires the City Manager to recommend purchases and contracts and requires additional approval by the City Council. There are only 18 Statutory Plan B Cities in MN. • In Edina, this approval is obtained through Requests for Purchase on the Consent agenda. • The $20,000 statutory threshold has not been raised since 2004. This does not account for standard inflation over the past 20 years. • The costs of items has significantly increased, most City purchases are well over $20,000. Allowing the City Manager a higher purchasing threshold can make purchasing more efficient, while still maintaining compliance and oversight of budget. • Neighboring charter cities with the Council-Manager form of Government, have significantly higher limits (St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, Richfield, Bloomington, Minneapolis, Hopkins) all have $175,000 thresholds. Page 726 of 746 4 • The City of Edina supports a raise in legal maximum to at least $175,000 (consistent with MN Statute 471.345) with the ability for individual City Councils to set lower thresholds at their discretion. 3. Hearing Aid Affordability Currently, hearing aids are not classified as durable medical equipment (DME) and therefore not covered under many health insurance plans. Without health insurance coverage, many who need hearing aids are unable to get them, as they cost three to six thousand dollars. The City supports programs or policy changes reducing the cost of hearing aids and increasing access to them because: • Hearing aids are critical devices for those who are deaf or hard of hearing. • Without health insurance coverage, hearing aids are not affordable for those living on a fixed income. Both Edina seniors on a fixed income and youth who age out of hearing aid support cannot access hearing aids because of cost. • Cochlear implants, which cost $80,000 to $120,000, are typically covered by health insurance while hearing aids are not. 4. Allow Restrictions on Possession of Firearms in Municipal Facilities with School-Like Use The Minnesota Citizens Personal Protection Act, also known as “conceal-and carry,” prohibits guns on most school properties but forbids other local units of government from prohibiting loaded firearms on their properties. The inconsistencies in the law’s treatment of different kinds of properties have caused confusion about how the law applies to multi-use facilities, such as municipal ice arenas used for school-sponsored programs. While various public facilities can restrict firearm possession, including schools, public facilities with a school-like function are not granted this authority. The City has several facilities with school-like usage and a large population of school-aged users. The City supports clarifying the law to allow municipal facilities with school-like usage to restrict the possession of firearms inside their facilities because: • This would align the law with other facilities that are authorized to restrict possession. • This would be one step to securing the safety of those who use City facilities for a school-like function. 5. Add Gun Safety Protections in Solidarity with the Annunciation Catholic School Community The Edina City Council calls for stronger protections against gun violence and calls on the State of Minnesota to enact and strengthen state-level protections which include consideration of the following: • Ensuring universal background checks on all commercial firearm transfers; • Strengthening Extreme Risk Protection Orders (Red Flag laws) by ensuring timely enforcement; • Enacting and funding strong safe-storage and child access prevention requirements, paired with statewide public education campaigns; • Prohibiting the sale and possession of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines; • Preserving and strengthening Minnesota’s permit-to-purchase and carry licensing system, and opposing permitless carry; • Banning ghost guns, 3D-printed firearms, bump stocks, and conversion devices; • Expanding funding for community violence intervention programs and hospital-based intervention models; and Page 727 of 746 5 • Fully funding school and youth mental health services so that trauma does not define our children’s futures. 6. Remove Language in the State Constitution Allowing for Enslavement of Incarcerated People The Minnesota Constitution states that “There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the state otherwise than as punishment for a crime of which the party has been convicted.” The City urges removal of this language because: • This is immoral and out of step with Minnesota values. As a public entity, it’s incumbent on public officials to hold the state accountable to remove this language and its consequences. • There is recent precedent for such an action, with Colorado, Nebraska, Utah, Alabama, Oregon, Tennessee, and Vermont striking similar language from their constitutions. 7. End Forced Labor in Minnesota Correctional Institutions The City of Edina supports efforts at the Minnesota Legislature to end forced labor in correctional institutions by reclassifying incarcerated individuals as workers or employees with the right to fair employment under HF3335 and SF3536. These measures would establish minimum wage standards for participants in the Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) program through the Minnesota Department of Corrections, whose labor directly benefits local communities, including Edina. Supporting fair and equitable compensation aligns with the City’s values, promotes workforce skill development, and contributes to successful community reintegration. • ICWC contract costs are estimated to increase with an established minimum wage, if the same number of hours of crew work is maintained. The City of Edina is contracted for two crews of 10 workers each who complete four 10-hour days of work. • Without additional funding to support the ICWC program in Edina, Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Facilities projects and services could be impacted. • In Edina, ICWC workers learn new job skills through serving the community through high-volume buckthorn and tree removals, installing and removing the sports dome, horticultural maintenance, cleaning of the ice arena, and other tasks during spring and fall transitions. • The ICWC program is part of the Department of Corrections (DOC) work release program, intended to be a transition to employment and stable residency in the community. The minimum wage increase is expected to ease the workers’ transition back into the community to assist with housing, family, restitution, and other living costs. 8. Empower Unbanked Minnesotans to Participate in the Local Economy The City of Edina would support legislation that requires certain businesses, such as food stores, to accept cash payments, similar to bill SF4419 introduced in the 93rd legislative session. With the increase in businesses refusing to accept cash for payment in recent years, more unbanked Minnesotans are prevented from participating in the local economy or purchasing necessities such as groceries and hygiene products. Page 728 of 746 6 9. Data Practices and Personal Information The purpose of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA) is to provide open and transparent information to the public, while protecting personal information from indiscriminate disclosure. The City supports mechanisms to define and regulate reasonable data requests, and charges that better reflect the actual costs of responding to data requests due to increases in data requests and increased staff time required for repetitive, broad and far-reaching requests. • Cities are experiencing increases in repetitive, overly broad, and far-reaching data requests. • These requests require significant staff time to locate government records, redact private data or data unrelated to the request, and assemble documents to be provided to comply with requirements to provide access to public government data. 10. Election Administration Support The City supports greater resources to assist in various aspects of election administration in local governments. • Supporting accessibility to voters who face barriers to voting. • Supporting technical/administrative improvements – some changes to timeline for campaign finance and procedure changes to the permanent absentee voting list. • Modernizing election judge responsibilities – allowing staff to perform signature matches for absentee ballots, language about emergency appointment of election judges for healthcare facilities. • Supporting RCV standards and equipment. • Supporting funding for elections through reimbursements from the state. • Supporting policies that protect and strengthen the security and safety of elections. 11. Expansion for Collection of Park Dedication and Parks Dedication Fees The City of Edina supports an expansion to cities’ abilities to collect park dedication feeds related to the creation of new housing units. The existing city authority should be preserved by the legislature to maintain an ability to require parkland dedication and park dedication fees. The City supports an amendment to Minnesota statute 462.358 to allow all cities the option to require a reasonable portion of land or park dedication fee on new housing units and new commercial and industrial development without the requirement that land be subdivided. 12. Change Group Home Regulation Licensed residential facilities do not have any distance separation requirements in single-family residential use zones in Edina. Minn. Stat. 245A.11 allows distance requirements of 1,320 feet between licensed residential facilities but limits the scope inequitably to cities in the first class. The City supports licensed residential facility use in the City and urges this distance separation requirements be applied fairly to all cities because: • Grouping multiple facilities on the same block in a single-family residential neighborhood creates substantial challenges to the neighborhood and reduces the community experience of individuals in the facilities. • Individuals no longer reap the benefit of enjoying a residential setting with a diversity of households. When entire blocks are acquired for licensed residential facilities, the setting is more similar to a large institutional campus. • Neighborhoods experience an increase in traffic, parking needs, deliveries, and other activities compounded by numerous facilities on the same block. Page 729 of 746 7 • Grouping multiple facilities effectively turns a residential area into a commercial area. 2. Municipal Liquor The City has operated a municipal liquor store since it was established by local referendum in 1948. The liquor operation’s profits assist in funding Edina’s recreational facilities, including the ice arena, art center and aquatic center, allowing the City to reduce user fees and allow greater access. The City’s recreation programs serve children and families from all over the metro area, not just Edina. Continual support of liquor stores and their ability to generate profit allows municipal liquor stores to benefit the community and region through local programs and amenities. 1. Reinforce the Open Wholesaling Systems through Legislation In 2021, Miami-based Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits filed a lawsuit against the State of Minnesota seeking elimination of a Minnesota law called the Coleman Act, which contains the open wholesaling system of spirits distribution. Open wholesaling of spirits requires that all spirit brands (with some exceptions) be available for sale to all licensed Minnesota wholesalers. This encourages healthy competition among wholesalers, benefiting both sellers and customers. If Southern Glazer's lawsuit is successful, more than half of the spirit brands in Minnesota may become exclusive with Southern Glazer's. The City opposes this lawsuit and supports an amendment of the Coleman Act to reinforce a system of open wholesaling because without protection for open wholesaling: • Wholesale prices will increase. • Service levels on certain brands will decrease. • Purchase and delivery schedules will be reduced. • Sale margins will be compressed. 2. Protect Customer Data As a municipal operation, municipal liquor stores may be subject to data practices requests. The City supports protections for customer data because: • Customer data subject to request could include purchase history and personal identifying information. • The threat of data requests erodes trust with the customer. • It may put municipal liquor stores at a competitive disadvantage. • The City’s municipal liquor operation discontinued its customer rewards program, because without clarity of what information is subject to a data request, the City would not hold personally identifying information and purchase history that could be subject to a data request. 3. Clarity on THC-Infused Products With the passage of Minn. Stat. 151.72 in July 2022, products containing THC are permitted for sale. The City seeks clarification on whether retail liquor stores can sell THC-infused beverages because: • Without federal passage of the SAFE banking act, cannabis-related legitimate operations cannot generate proceeds from unlawful activity, and banking institutions can be penalized by federal authorities for providing services to a cannabis-related business. • Current regulation allows retailers like Edina Liquor to accept credit card payments only if the percentage of total revenue from THC products is less than 15%. Page 730 of 746 8 4. Maintain Constraints on Off-Sale Liquor Currently, grocery and convenience stores can sell 3.2% alcohol, while all other alcohol products are sold at liquor stores. Some grocery stores opt to apply for an off-sale liquor license and can sell beer, wine and liquor at the store, with some adjustments, including a separate entrance. The City of Edina supports maintaining the constraints on off-sale liquor because: • The constraints allow for smaller private and municipal liquor stores to compete on an even playing field. Claims that the off-sale liquor license process inhibits growth are rebutted by several grocery stores opting for some locations applying for the off-sale liquor license. 3. Affordable Housing Affordable Housing includes two focuses – regulatory tools for affordable housing and protecting low- and moderate- income tenants. 1. Reduce the Tax Rate on Land Trust Properties to Align with the 4d Property Tax Classification Previous legislative sessions made changes to the tax classification of Community Land Trust properties by changing the tax classification from 1a – Residential Homestead classification, from an up to 1.25% rate to a new 4d(2) Homestead Community Land Trust at 0.75%. The City supports a change to align with the 4d(1) property tax classification, which is applied to low-income rental properties at up to a 0.25% rate because: • Homeowners lease, and do not own, the land from the Land Trust. • The property is required to be affordable as memorialized through the ground lease. • The Land Trust is designed to create affordable home ownership opportunities, but requiring the homeowner to pay property taxes on the value of the house and the land at a higher rate makes homes less affordable. • Due to both leasing the land and the requirement that it stay affordable, a reduced 4d(1) is a more appropriate tax classification than 1a or 4d(2). • Edina has 30 land trust residential properties, with property values in the city rapidly increasing. High property values and corresponding taxes impact the ability of land trust homeowners to remain in their home. 2. Protection of and Taxation for Housing Purchased by Corporations for Renting The City supports legislation that authorizes a tax on the sale of these properties to corporations and protections prohibiting the conversion of single-family residences into rental properties by developers and corporations. The City supports bills introduced in the 92nd legislature: SF 3147, imposing the tax, and SF 4313, prohibiting the conversion, because: • The City and surrounding communities have seen an increase in the number of residences converted from single family homes owned by the residents to rental properties. • Such conversion negatively impacts ownership opportunities for residents. 3. Support for “Missing Middle” Legislation with Local Controls While the “missing middle” housing bill in the 93rd Legislature (HF4009/SF3964) was tabled, the City would look favorably on legislation that similarly encourages and incentivizes “missing middle” housing and strategic land use Page 731 of 746 9 adjustments, provided it has more flexibility for local control options. The City supports strategic gentle density because: • The City’s Climate Action Plan has goals for reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) 7 percent and doubling public transit commuter ridership by 2030, both of which are only possible in a more walkable, bikeable, and transit- friendly Edina. • Diversifying housing stock by providing options such as accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and duplexes allows communities like Edina to maintain their suburban character while allowing more residents to age in place, downsize, purchase starter homes, raise their families where they themselves grew up, and more while remaining affordable. Increasing the City’s population broadens the tax base, keeping individual household taxes low while maintaining high levels of municipal services. 4. Promote Owner-Occupied Housing The City supports opportunities that promote affordable home ownership for residents, which includes the modification or removal of regulations that limit residents’ potential for affordable home ownership, for example, Minnesota’s 1-2-10 Warranty. 4. Environment & Sustainability Environment & Sustainability has five thematic focuses – energy management and environment, right to repair, sustainable transportation, local environmental public health programs and water resource management. 1. Establish Building Performance Standards Large commercial buildings are a significant contributor to Minnesota’s and Edina’s greenhouse gas emissions. Building energy benchmarking is already in use, requiring building owners to report energy use but includes no requirement for improving their building’s energy efficiency. The City supports establishing building performance standards that creates greenhouse gas emission reduction and energy performance targets, a timeline to meet them, and financial resources to help building owners comply. 2. Establish a Right to Cooling Standard for Minnesotans Minnesota has an “Extreme Heat Law” to prevent utility disconnection during extreme heat conditions. To expand protections against the negative effects of extreme heat, the City of Edina supports establishing a "right to cooling" standard, similar to the "right to heating" standard adopted in 2023, to ensure renters have the ability to cool their home throughout the summer beyond a National Weather Service alert for excessive heat. This right to cooling should be coupled with increased resources for the Energy Assistance Program (EAP) that provides utility bill relief and Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) that supports air sealing and insulation upgrades. Resources should include the ability to accept applications year-round and without a cap on annual service recipients. The City supports this because: • Minnesota is warming rapidly. • Excessive heat has well-documented health consequences, including serious illness and death. • Renters require additional protections to ensure landlords provide a safe and functional home. Page 732 of 746 10 3. Allow Portable (“Balcony”) Solar Systems Renewable electricity helps Minnesotans reduce their carbon footprint, save money on energy bills, and increase their building’s resiliency. Portable solar systems, often referred to as “balcony solar” are portable, small scale solar kits that are plug-in ready and increase solar access for residents. The City supports changes to building code, solar and interconnection permitting, and other regulations to allow the use of these systems because: • Renters cannot leverage renewable electricity without landlord investment and approval. • Installing solar panels is a high up-front cost and these kits are more affordable and accessible. • Allowing for balcony solar increases consumer choice at a time when energy prices are rising. 4. Recommit Funding for Crucial Climate Action Programs State appropriations from the 2023 legislative session for several critical climate programs and incentives, like the electric vehicle rebates, Solar on Public Buildings Program, Implementation Grants for Stormwater & Community Resilience, multiple MPCA-administered climate planning grants, and more, have expired. These programs provide direct support to Minnesota homeowners, renters, businesses, and nonprofit organizations looking to invest in their homes and buildings. We know cost is one of the largest barriers to climate action and the City supports continued funding for these programs and others that allow for immediate project implementation. Without these crucial programs, the City of Edina would not have been able to pursue the following projects that are essential to adapting our community’s infrastructure to a changing climate: • With $50,000 from a Local Climate Action Grant, Edina will be the first municipality in Minnesota to use B100 biofuel for our heavy-duty vehicles instead of petroleum diesel. This will reduce our snowplow and dump trucks’ emissions by up to 90 percent while supporting Minnesota soy farmers. • A $1.1 million Implementation Grant for Stormwater Resilience is funding a new lift station and adaptive level control system at Edina’s York Avenue Pond. By increasing the pond’s stormwater storage capacity and increasing the pumping rate, this project will protect 355 units of housing from increased flood risk due to climate change and reduce downstream sediment pollution to Nine Mile Creek and the Mississippi River. • As part of the new Fred Richards Park, the City received a $500,000 Implementation Grant for Community Resilience to construct artificial shade structures in community gathering spaces. With Minnesota’s summers getting increasingly hotter, these shade structures will alleviate the lack of accessible shade areas and provide immediate hot weather relief for one of Edina’s densest and fastest-growing neighborhoods. 5. Increase Funding for the State E-bike Rebate Program The State allocated $2 million for a statewide e-bike rebate program in 2024 and 2025. The program had high demand from Minnesotans with approximately 1,300 vouchers awarded in 2024 and an expected 2,700-2,800 in 2025. The City supports a new allocation for funding because: • 2024 and 2025 program participation demonstrated a high demand for assistance. • With new 2025 program requirements, more low-income residents will be able to access climate-friendly transportation. • E-bikes are associated with vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions that meet our State, County and city climate goals, plus e-bike users see immediate positive health benefits and increased mobility. Page 733 of 746 11 6. Establish State Funding to Support Expanded Carshare Networks in the Twin Cities and Minnesota Xcel Energy pulled private funding from HOURCAR in 2023, the nonprofit electric carshare service in Minneapolis and Saint Paul. The City supports an expanded network and has studied resident support via a partnership with the University of Minnesota’s Resilient Communities Project in 2022-23. The City supports this because: • Carshares are a viable alternative to owning a personal vehicle. • Carshares have a demonstrated history of reducing vehicle miles traveled. 7. Allocate 100% of State Revenue from the Solid Waste Management Tax (SCORE) to County Waste Management Activities Currently, the City is awarded a portion of the SCORE funds annually for residential recycling, residential organics recycling and participation in both at the multi-family building level. The City strives to spend 100% of the funds on allowable purposes. The City supports continued SCORE funding because: • The funds advance waste reduction, reuse, recycling and organics programs to meet city, county and state recycling goals. • SCORE funding allows the City to conduct critical outreach. 8. Fund Expanded Infrastructure at the Local Level for the Creation of Compost Processing Sites and Anaerobic Digesters The City supports additional funding for counties creating compost processing sites and anaerobic digesters because: • Landfilling all waste in Hennepin County and metropolitan area is no longer a viable option. • Compost processing sites and anaerobic digesters provide more options for waste haulers. 9. Develop and Fund Zero-Waste Initiatives Zero-waste initiatives manage all discarded materials to their highest and best use according to the waste management hierarchy set forth in the Waste Management Act. The City supports the development of zero-waste initiatives because: • They will aid local governments reaching recycling and composting goals. • The City’s waste reduction goals mirror those set by the state, county and Edina’s climate action plans. 10. Expand Right to Repair Law The Digital Fair Repair Act that went into effect on July 1, 2024, is instrumental to reducing waste and encouraging reuse in Minnesota by furthering the life of consumer products. To further the success of the new law, the right to repair measures should be expanded to include previously excluded equipment such as farm equipment and wheelchairs (similar to Colorado’s law) and vehicles (such as in Massachusetts). Expanding on the right-to-repair to include more than just electronics would improve this new law to be even more equitable for a wider range of Minnesotans. Page 734 of 746 12 11. Continue Support for Local Environmental Health Regulatory Programs Currently, the State delegates authority to operate food, pool and lodging establishment regulatory programs to cities and counties. The City supports continuing local operation of these public health services and programs, because it allows cities to provide services to meet local needs. 12. Support Funding Research, Training, and Legislation for Applicators of Chloride- Containing De-icing Chemicals Salt is a pollutant and causes damage to infrastructure and the environment. Private contractors tend to over-apply salt on parking lots and sidewalks, often because they are afraid of “slip-and-fall” lawsuits. The City supports state funding for research and training for public and private applicators of chloride-containing de-icing chemicals, and legislation to address liability concerns of private de-icing salt applicators. Waterbodies throughout the state, including within and downstream of Edina, fail to meet the water quality standards for chloride (salt) established by the state and so have been added to the federal register of impaired waters as required by the Clean Water Act. 13. Support Truth in Labeling for Chloride-Containing De-icing Chemicals Truth in labeling can help consumers by providing access to accurate and comprehensive information regarding the composition, environmental impact, risks to infrastructure damage, and exposure risk to pets. Current labeling practices falsely claim or imply chloride containing products are environmentally safe and/or pet safe. Truth labeling would empower individuals to select the appropriate material for the job and reduce overapplication. 14. Support Reduction of Chloride Pollution from Wastewater Effluent Chloride pollution in wastewater effluent comes primarily from water softening processes. Reducing chloride in wastewater effluent is important for meeting clean water goals in downstream waterbodies. Wastewater generated locally is treated at the regional wastewater treatment plant before discharging to the Mississippi River. Reducing chloride pollution in wastewater will benefit downstream aquatic ecosystems, protect drinking water sources, and extend the lifespan of water infrastructure. 15. Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Municipal Grant Program Inflow and infiltration (I/I) describe the ways that groundwater and stormwater make its way into sanitary sewer pipes and gets treated, unnecessarily, at regional wastewater plants. The Metropolitan Council identifies cities contributing excessive I/I into the regional wastewater system and charges the city for the excess. The City supports state financial assistance to cities for metro area I/I mitigation, such as the Municipal State Bond Grant Program because: • I/I mitigation supports efficient use of the regional system for waste treatment. • I/I mitigation slows the need for capacity upgrades. 5. Transportation 1. Continue and Increase Municipal State Aid (MSA) Funding The City has 40.85 miles of roads designated as MSA. This state funding is vital to maintain these high-quality connections. The City asks for continued support of municipal state aid funding because: • The state aid road system was developed to provide vital, high-quality connections necessary for the overall state highway network to work well. Page 735 of 746 13 • The roads that are on the state aid system typically carry heavier traffic volumes, connect major points of interest and provide an integrated and coordinated road system. 2. Municipal State Aid (MSA) Cost Participation The City supports malleability in, or exemption from, cost participation policies, especially for cities with a disproportionate amount of state or county highways within and encircling their local boundaries. Special or additional funding from the state legislative for cities that have these burdens of additional cost participation in projects involving state and county roads including the placement of underground utilities due to those projects should be supported. 3. Support Local Design Control on Municipal State Aid (MSA) Roads As a condition of receiving state funding for Municipal State Aid roads, agencies are required to follow prescriptive design standards for roadway widths, lane configurations, and design speeds. These rules, intended to support uniformity and prioritize motor vehicle travel, often make it difficult for cities to create safe, multi-modal neighborhood-oriented corridors. The City supports legislation to grant local design control to cities to implement alternative design approaches that promote safety and mobility for all modes. 4. Increase Local Bridge Replacement Program (LBRP) Funding The Local Bridge Replacement Program provides local agencies funding for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or removal of bridges or structures. The program is financed by the passage of specific legislation allocating general obligation state bond funds but regularly does not receive enough funding. The City supports funding dedicated to the Local Bridge Replacement Program to provide safe bridges because the City has 27 local bridges. 5. Support the Highway Justice Act The City is surrounded and bisected by several highways, including State Highway 62, State Highway 100, US Highway 169 and Interstate 494. While these roadways help connect the City to regional destinations, they also contribute to local air pollution, increased traffic on local frontage roads and create barriers between neighborhoods. The City asks for support of the Highway Justice Act, which would help create a transportation system that strengthens our communities by requiring meaningful community engagement, protecting environmental justice communities, and funding multimodal transportation solutions along trunk highway corridors. 6. Expansion of Public Transportation Frequency and Reach Edina, like much of the Metro area, continues to experience a persistent reduction in transit service frequency and reach as a result of pandemic-era service reductions and workforce shortages. The City supports additional funding to return transit service to pre-pandemic levels, support operator hiring initiatives, and develop a connecting bus study for the METRO Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT) because: • The City’s transit ridership prior to the pandemic was about half the average rate of Hennepin County. • Adequate public transit offerings are essential to doubling public transit ridership to seven percent by 2030 to reach our Climate Action Plan goals. • Transit service supports many community and regional goals, including improving mobility, relieving traffic congestion, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and promoting sustainable development and growth. Page 736 of 746 14 7. Increase Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Funding to Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled Transportation emissions account for 40% of Edina’s baseline greenhouse gas emissions and are projected to become the leading emissions source in Edina as the energy sector decarbonizes. The City supports funding to provide pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to decrease the use of single-occupancy vehicles and their associated negative impacts on air quality, traffic congestion and quality of life because: • Total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in Edina in 2023 was more than 537 million miles, an increase from previous years and reaching pre-pandemic levels. • Edina’s Climate Action Plan, Hennepin County’s Climate Action Plan and Minnesota’s Climate Action Framework all identify the need to reduce VMT to meet climate goals. • Decreasing commuters driving alone by six percent to match the county-wide average would decrease VMT by up to 10 million miles. 8. Allow Biofuel Blends up to 100% as part of State Biodiesel Content Mandate Current State statute mandates a 20% biofuel blend for summer months. Growing technology and increased availability of higher blend biofuels on the market make updating Statute a benefit for both heavy-duty fleet operators and Minnesotan farmers and biofuel production facilities. The City supports updates to statute and fire code to make biofuel blends up to B100 an allowable use because: • State of Minnesota and City of Edina have specific climate action goals to reduce tailpipe emissions from medium- and heavy-duty fleet vehicles; and electrification of these fleet vehicles is cost-prohibitive and, in some cases, negatively affects service levels. • Biofuel is a cost-effective, market-ready solution to fleet decarbonization. • Biofuel consumption directly supports Minnesota farmers and agriculture. • Biofuel blends, specifically B100, are safer to dispense compared to traditional petroleum diesel fuel. 9. Exempt Government Agencies from New Public EV Charging Licensing Requirements As an outcome from the 2025 legislative 1st special session, several amendments were enacted that affect electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE): 1. Chapter 296A (Tax on Petroleum and Other Fuels) section 051 now requires a Public Charging Operator’s License for electric vehicle chargers; 2. Chapter 239.90 (Weights and Measures) now requires that electric vehicle charging station owners pay a $100 annual inspection fee per port, as well as instituting requirements for method of sale, labeling, and advertising for retail EVSE; and 3. Chapter 296A section 075 now requires a $0.05 per kilowatt-hour of electricity tax for all public charging stations with a capacity of more than 50 kilowatts that charge a fee for use. The City of Edina supports consistency in the method of sale, labeling, and advertising in support of consumers who utilize the State of Minnesota's growing public charging network. However, the City opposes the requirement for a public charging operator’s license and the new annual $100 inspection fee per port for retail EVSE. • A license is not warranted since any life safety concerns posed by electricity delivered via vehicle charging would be addressed at the point of installation and code compliance inspection. In addition, the Public Utilities Page 737 of 746 15 Commission has regulatory oversight of investor and cooperative electric utilities, ensuring electricity is delivered in a safe, cost-effective manner. • The narrow definition of “public charging station” within the statute limits this license requirement to charging stations that are 1) located at a for-profit business and 2) require a charge (fee) for a customer to use—meaning that any chargers located on tax-exempt parcels or offered for free are exempt from the operator’s license, posing an inconsistency that clouds the purpose of the statute. Additionally, chargers that are free to use for the first hour or longer are in a legal gray area. • “Retail EVSE” is not defined in statute, creating additional confusion of what stations would be required to pay an inspection fee. Assuming EVSE owned by government agencies, multi-family properties, and other private entities that charge for the stations use would be covered, the City of Edina would assume a new $2,400 annual cost burden to operate its stations. • Many public EV charging stations are connected to a managed network, which automatically notifies operators of outages, errors, or potential damage at the port. Additional regulation of the station ports itself is not needed. • State of Minnesota and City of Edina have specific climate action goals to increase access to EV chargers through public investment in EV chargers. Increasing the cost and administrative commitment for installing and owning these stations through fees and licensing will reduce the number of publicly available stations, slowing adoption of electric vehicles at a time in which the state and most cities are already not on track to reach their climate goals. While the City of Edina does not oppose the idea of a tax on public fast chargers to fund the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund, we would appreciate assurance that those chargers will have a sales and use tax exemption for the electricity and that this is communicated to the charging networks that work with EVSE owners to collect and remit sales taxes annually. 5. Public Safety While this section appears to only include Fire and EMS positions, the City is aligned with the MCPA’s 2026 legislative agenda and supports their focuses on extending POST training fund reimbursement to agencies, recruitment and retention, stiffer penalties for auto theft and fleeing, and other positions that advocate for the highest quality of police services and leadership to Minnesota residents. 1. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Local Control In February 2022, the Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA) released a report that found serious deficiencies with both the management of the Emergency Medical Service Regulatory Board and the current ambulance service license process. During the 2023 legislative session, the Minnesota Fire Association Coalition introduced legislation, HF2736 and SF2691, to implement the recommendations of the OLA relating to the primary service areas. The City supports this legislation because: • Local governments should be able to set standards for EMS service in their communities. • Local governments should have the authority to find an EMS provider than can meet local standards. 2. Residential Fire Sprinklers There are few statutory requirements for residential fire sprinklers. The City opposes efforts to statutorily limit the use of residential fire sprinklers and supports the inclusion of professionals and industry experts in the creating or writing of any code parameters, particularly the installation of fire suppression systems in residential building code, because: Page 738 of 746 16 • Sprinklers protect occupants, firefighters and property from fires. • Recent Minnesota studies show the cost of installing residential fire sprinkler systems averages $1.15 per sprinklered square foot, or approximately one percent of new home construction. Page 739 of 746 17 City of Edina Contact Information Priorities City Manager, Scott Neal, can be contacted regarding any of the legislative priorities, in addition to the staff below. Scott can be reached at SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401. 1. Local Sales Tax Spending Authority Amendment a. Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 2. Fire Station 3/Municipal Campus Land Dedication a. Chad Millner, Director of Public Works and City Engineer: CMillner@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0318 3. Lift Firearm Preemption and Allow Local Regulation a. Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 4. Enabling Social Districts for Vibrant Commercial Corridors a. Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager: BNeuendorf@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0407 5. Sales Tax Exemption for Projects in the Braemar Park Master Plan and Fred Richards Park Master Plan a. Perry Vetter, Director of Parks & Recreation: PVetter@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0430 6. Protect Municipal Employees with Enforcement Functions a. Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 Positions General Government 1-11: Scott Neal, City Manager: SNeal@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0401 12: Cary Teague, Director of Community Development: CTeague@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0460 Municipal Liquor 1-4: Michael McBride, Liquor Operations General Manager: MMcBride@EdinaMN.gov or 952-903-5748 Affordable Housing 1-4: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Manager: SHawkinson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-833-9578 Environment & Sustainability 1-6: Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager: MBayer@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-1621 7-10: Twila Singh, Organics Coordinator: TSignh@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-1657 11: Jeff Brown, Public Health Manager: JBrown@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0466 12-14: Jessica VanderWerff Wilson, Water Resources Manager: JWilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445 15: Ross Bintner, Engineering Services Manager: RBintner@EdinaMN.gov or 952-903-5713 Page 740 of 746 18 Transportation 1-4: Chad Millner, Director of Public Works & City Engineer: CMillner@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0318 5-7: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner: AScipioni@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0440 8-9: Marisa Bayer, Sustainability Manager: MBayer@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-1621 Public Safety 1-2: Andrew Slama, Fire Chief: ASlama@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0332 Page 741 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 9.7 Department: Administration Item Activity: Action Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager Item Title: Resolution 2026-05: Approving the Proposed Local Sales Tax Question and Authorizing an Election thereon during the 2026 General Election Action Requested: Approve resolution 2026-05 approving the proposed local sales tax question and authorizing an election thereon during the 2026 General Election. Information/Background: Minnesota State Statutes 297A.99 subdivision 2 requires that the governing boards of political subdivisions that are requesting new state legislation establishing or modifying an existing local sales tax must adopt a specific form of resolution affirming that request and submit the resolution to the chair and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over taxes no later than January 31 of the year in which the jurisdiction is seeking the special law authorization. If the Council has any interest in using future local sales tax for capital improvements at our regional parks & recreation facilities, it is critical to adopt this resolution at this City Council meeting, because it is your last opportunity to do it before the January 31 deadline. Even if you’re not completely supportive of the proposal, I would recommend voting in favor of the resolution. If Council decides later that it does not support the proposal, we can always withdraw our proposal. But if you don’t adopt the resolution now, then the sales tax proposal is dead for the year. State Statute requires that it be used only for capital projects and improvements and associated infrastructure for regionally significant projects. Staff will put forward a proposal to use local sales tax revenues for the following regionally significant parks and recreation facilities: Braemar Park (golf, baseball, ice arena), Edina Art Center, Edinborough Park, Centennial Lakes Park, Fred Richards Park and the Edina Aquatic Center. In addition, I recommend the City request for approval from the state to use a portion of the new spending authorization for costs related to Fire Station #3 and associated public safety infrastructure costs. The local sales tax is the City’s most robust form of non-property tax revenue. The local sales tax is the City’s only source of legal non-property tax municipal revenue. It is the only non-property tax source of revenue with the horsepower to support this level of public investment. Our current average monthly revenue sales tax revenue is $600,000, creating annual revenue of over $7 million per year. The City currently has voter authorization for a local sales tax of 0.5% for not more than 19 years. The City has spending authority of $71 million. The City’s current sales tax revenue will exceed our spending authority in ten years or less. My proposal is to advance a referendum question to Edina voters in November 2026 to allow the City to spend the full amount of local sales tax collected during the 19- Page 742 of 746 year time period for which it is already authorized. These funds would be used to pay for eligible expenses at the previously stated City facilities. We are proposing no change in the rate or duration of the local sales tax form what has been previously approved by Edina voters. The proposed spending plan would look like this: • Increase the City’s approved spending by $4 million to cover construction related inflation costs at its two existing local sales tax funded projects at Braemar Arena and Fred Richards Park by amending the scope of the current eligible expenses to include the following expense categories: design; architecture; scoping; estimating; engineering; construction lease payments; HVAC commissioning; payroll and fringe benefit costs for City employees who perform direct work for the project(s); furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) for all elements of the project(s); and communications and community engagement for the project(s); and, elements of the project(s); and communications and community engagement for the project(s); and, • To authorize the City of Edina to host an additional local sales tax referendum during the 2026 general election to authorize local sales tax funding for the following major capital and infrastructure improvements: New Public Safety Facilities (design and construction) Edinborough Park (CIP spending) Centennial Lake Park (CIP spending) Edina Art Center (tenant improvement costs) Edina Aquatic Center (CIP spending) Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse (design) Staff have prepared the attached resolution to comply with the law. We ask City Council Members to adopt the resolution and direct staff to transmit it to the appropriate legislators. Supporting Documentation: None Page 743 of 746 Resolution 2026-05: Approving the Proposed Local Sales Tax Question and Authorizing an Election thereon during the 2026 General Election Whereas Minnesota Statutes Section 297A.99, provides the City of Edina with authority to impose a local sales tax if that tax is approved by a legislative special law and by the voters at a general election; and Whereas subd. 2 of M.S.S. 297A.99 requires the governing board of a political subdivision to adopt and transmit a resolution to the State Legislature on or before January 31 of the year in which it plans to submit the question to a referendum of eligible voters within the jurisdiction; and, Whereas the City Council believes the local sales tax is a superior funding mechanism for local capital projects than an increase property taxes to fund such projects; and, Whereas Edina voters have previously approved two referendums (2022 and 2023) which established a local sales tax of 0.5% for 19 years and a spending limit of $71.1 million; and, Whereas the projected annual revenue from the local sales exceeds $140 million; and, Whereas the projected annual revenue, minus the previously approved spending plan, can provide additional funding for Edina’s regionally significant public facilities. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that: The voters of Edina be provided the opportunity during the general election in 2026 to vote on an expansion of the local sales tax spending authority, with its rate and duration remaining unchanged, to fund the following capital projects: • Increase the City’s approved spending by $4 million to fund construction related inflation costs at its two existing local sales tax funded projects at Braemar Arena and Fred Richards Park by amending the scope of the current eligible expenses to include the following expense categories: design; architecture; scoping; estimating; engineering; construction lease payments; HVAC commissioning; payroll and fringe benefit costs for City employees who perform direct work for the project(s); furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) for all elements of the project(s); and communications and community engagement for the project(s); and, elements of the project(s); and communications and community engagement for the project(s); and, • To authorize the City of Edina to host an additional local sales tax referendum during the 2026 general election to authorize local sales tax funding for the following major capital and infrastructure improvements: New Public Safety Facilities (design and construction) Page 744 of 746 Edinborough Park (CIP spending) Centennial Lake Park (CIP spending) Edina Art Center (tenant improvement costs) Edina Aquatic Center (CIP spending) Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse (design) Be it further resolved that City staff is directed to submit this resolution to the appropriate state legislative officials for official consideration during the State Legislature’s 2026 legislative session. Dated: January 20, 2026 Page 745 of 746 Item Report January 20, 2026 City Council Item Number: 11.1 Department: Administration Item Activity: Discussion Prepared By: Scott Neal, City Manager Item Title: Discuss City Response to Current Federal Immigration Enforcement Action Action Requested: None; discussion. Information/Background: Supporting Documentation: None Page 746 of 746