Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-12-18 Meeting PacketAGENDA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM December 18, 2014 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of November 20, 2014 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During “Community Comment,” the Transportation Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight’s agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Edina Challenge Transportation Priority Discussion B. Capital Improvement Plan Transportation Projects C. 2013 Street Reconstruction Project Survey Results D. Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 3, 2014 E. Updates i. Student Member ii. Bike Edina Working Group iii. Living Streets Working Group iv. Walk Edina Working Group v. Communications Committee VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission December 18, 2014 Page 2 VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS IX. STAFF COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Thursday December 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday January 15 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday February 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday March 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday April 16 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday May 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday June 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday July 16 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\TRANSPORTATION DIV\Transportation Commission\Agendas & RR's\2014 Agendas\20141218 Agenda.docx To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Joseph Totten, Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: December 18, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of December 3, 2014 Agenda Item #: VI. D. Action Discussion El Information 111 Action Requested: Review and recommend Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of Wednesday December 3, 2014, be forwarded to City Council for approval. Information / Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the meeting. An overview of the comments from the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be included in the staff report provided to Council for their January 20, 2014 meeting. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report for December 3, 2014. G: \ PW \ CENTRAL SVCS \ TRANSPORTATION DIV \Traffic Safety Committee \ Staff Review Summaries\ 14 TSAC & Min\ 12-03-14 Cover.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Traffic Safety Committee Report Wednesday, December 3rd, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 03. The City Engineer, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and the Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, the persons who requested the investigation have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. The requestors have been informed that they may speak on the matters here provided at the December 18 Edina Transportation Commission and the January 20 City Council meetings. Al. Request for street name placards on 70t11 Street at 70th Street cul-de-sac The requestor states that often vehicles tailgate drivers as they turn from 70th Street, South- Westbound to Westbound at Metro Boulevard. The requestor states that the following drivers do not leave enough space for a deceleration to complete the turn into the cul-de-sac. The requestor requested a green placard to demarcate the street as present to further signify the intersection to vehicles on 70th Street. Research on this application has been minimal, however advance placement signs have been shown to have a slight decrease in injury causing collisions'. A count from this summer has 9430 AADT using 70th Street, with an 85th percentile speed of 31.1 mph, a count from 2012 closer to the location of this request had a higher 85th percentile speed of 37.1 mph. No accidents have been reported at this location in the last 5 years. Photo : 70' St• looking west, towards the cul-de-sac entrance. Photo : 70th St. looking east, cul-de-sac in the foreground, metroBlvd/70th St intersection in the background Map :h.St and 70th St. Intersections in question Federal Highway Administration, Safety Evaluation of Advance Street Name Signs, June 2009, FWHA-HRT-09-029 http://www.fhwa.dot.goy/publications/research/safety/09029/#toc229910885, accessed November 2014 11Page Public Works Facility After review, staff recommends placing a placard signifying the house numbers present in the cul-de- sac. This decision was reached largely due to the input of the Police Traffic Supervisor, who emailed that these properties are difficult for officers to locate. A2. Request for changing the traffic control at the intersection of Bush Lake Road and Dewey Hill Road The requestor states that this intersection, currently a three-way stop and a four-legged intersection is confusing and dangerous. The requestor notes that many people do not yield properly to the northbound traffic, which is not controlled. This lack of yielding leads to confusion and delay. Forty-eight hours of video of this intersection were reviewed. Unexpected and dangerous situations included many vehicles not stopping or yielding to northbound traffic, one near collision and multiple times where a cautious driver avoided a near collision. There have been no crashes reported in this location in the last five years. At the intersection there are AADTs of approximately 4500 on the south and west legs of the intersection (approximate volumes are noted due to older age of the counts). Speeding in this location has not been observed as an issue in the past. Map : Intersection of Bush Lake Rd and Dewey Hill Rd Photo : Bush Lake Rd, looking north, towards Dewey Hill After review, staff does not recommend changing the traffic control at this intersection. However, staff does recommend the placards, signifying that a direction of traffic does not stop, be replaced with high visibility yellow placards. 2IPage Map : Valley Lane and Tracy Map : Highwood Dr. and Idylwood Dr. ef. Photo : Tracy Ave. Looking north, towards Valley Lane Section B : Items on which staff recommends denial 131. Request for the intersection of Valley Lane and Tracy Avenue to be converted from a one-way stop to an all way stop The requestor states that delays are common and turning left from Valley Lane to Tracy Avenue is difficult. A delay study was executed for the intersection and it was found that the average hourly delay during rush hours was maximized at times 07:21:20 - 08:21:20, with an average delay of 14.6 seconds per vehicle. The maximum hourly average delay for the PM peak hour was from 16:52:20 - 17:52:20, and had an average vehicle delay of 14.2 seconds per vehicle. One crash has been reported in this location in the past year. Four crashes have been reported in the last five years. Tracy Avenue in this location has an 85th percentile speed of 36.9 mph, and AADT of 9190. 33%-45% of vehicles turn left at this intersection, and likely have a higher amount of delay, however this is not considered in the warrants. This intersection does not meet engineering warrants from the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for multi-way stop control. Warrants are attached in Appendix A. After review, staff recommends denial of this request at this time. This recommendation was due to a lack of warrants and pending improvements to the intersection that will be built in conjunction with the Nine-Mile Regional Trail. B2. Request for stop signs to be placed on Idylwood Drive at Highwood Drive Requestor states that the currently uncontrolled intersection of Idylwood and Highwood is dangerous and should be controlled with a stop sign on Idylwood. Idylwood at this location has an AADT of 155 vehicles and an 85th-percentile speed of 27.6 mph. Highwood has an AADT of 139 in this location with an 85th-percentile speed of 17.5 mph. There have been no reported crashes in this location within the last five years. Using 85th percentile speeds, there are no observed sight distance issues at this intersection, with 30 mph being used on Idylwood, and 20 mph on Highwood. 3IPage After review, staff recommends denial of this request. This recommendation was due to the intersection not meeting warrants for stop signs, and a lack of otherwise extraordinary circumstances. Photo : High wood Dr, looking south, towards ldylwood Or B3. Request for traffic calming on William Avenue This request comes from a resident on William Avenue, who states that traffic routinely drives at excessive speeds down the street, and that it is an overused cut-through for traffic avoiding Interlachen and Vernon. A traffic count on William from earlier in the year had 139 AADT with an 85th percentile speed of 24.5 mph. This count was done close to the intersection with 51st Street, and likely had some speed influences, however site visits seemed to indicate this effect was minimal. Other counts in this area from previous years indicate that other streets in the area have similar volumes and speeds. One area of possible concern would be that 28 vehicles would be considered heavy vehicles (delivery trucks, buses). The requestor asked for posting of speed limit signs, physical traffic calming, enforcement, and sidewalks in the neighborhood. Photo : William Ave, looking north, towards Interlachen Map : William Ave, count location After review, staff recommends denial of the request, due to low speeds and low volumes being observed in this location. The request for sidewalks was forwarded to the Transportation Planner. Section D : Other items handled by Traffic Safety Dl. The Transportation Planner was made aware of a situation with the bridge over 169 at Bren Road, traffic in this area and snow clearance, this was forwarded to public works and the police department. D2. A resident spoke of a dangerous situation with cars parking too close to the intersection of Sunnyside and France. The requestor was informed of the city's non-emergency number on the EdinaToGo application for smartphones, and the requestor stated that he would report parking within 30' of the intersection. D3. A resident who attends St. Stephen's Church asked for approximate parking stall lengths and estimates for the capacity of parking bays near the church. These were provided. The requestor might call back to further this request once the church reviews his numbers of usage vs the capacity provided. 4 1Page D4. A resident from the Edina West Condominiums asked for investigation of the sight distances from the driveway onto Lincoln Drive. The sight distances are inadequate, but making them adequate requires clearing of vegetation on Edina West Condominiums property. Informed the requestor of this, and offered assistance to the property managers in how much removal should be done to allow proper sight distances. D5. A resident asked for the intersection of 69th and York to be reconfigured to help right turning movements. This request was forwarded to the county, who has appropriate software and expertise, and controls the signal at this intersection. The county recommends keeping the current layout unless Edina would like to build an additional east-bound right turn lane. 5 1Page Appendix A Multi-way Stop Applications State MNMUTCD 2B.7) Multi-Way STOP The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85t1-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items land 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. 6 1Page Appendix B Stop Sign Warrants, Edina City Policy 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a stop sign, a residential intersection should be left uncontrolled. 4. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 5. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 6. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 7. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 8. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 9. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. State Warrants Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C. Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach; and E. Reported crash experience. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right- of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or 7j Page C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. 8age REPORT / RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: December 18, 2014 Subject: 2013 Street Reconstruction Project Survey Results Action Requested: None. Agenda Item #: VI. C. Action 0 Discussion 0 Information Information / Background: Please recall over the past few years the engineering department has conducted a survey of residents that were affected by our street reconstruction projects. The results attached are from our 2013 Street Reconstruction Projects which include the following neighborhoods: Braemar Hills B, Gleason Circle, Lake Edina, Mendelssohn A, Normandale, and St. Patrick's Lane. These results help us identify trends in how we communicate with residents about street reconstruction. We use this data to improve our processes and/or communications so that the residents understand the process better. Attached is the presentation given by Engineering Director Chad Millner to City Council at their Nov. 18, 2014 meeting. Attachments: Nov. 18, 2014 Presentation to City Council: 2013 Survey Results G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Transportation Commission \ Agendas & RR's \2014 R&R \ 20141218 \ Item VI.C. 2013 Street Reconstruction Project Survey Results.docx 77111111111111161+ . City of Edina 4801 W. 50,11 St. Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA To which street reconstruction project is this survey in response? "'Braemar Hills B Reconstruction • Gleason Cade Reconstruction Lake Edina Reconstruction o klendelssohn A Reconstruction • Normandale Reconstructon OSI. Patrick's Lane Reconstruction 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA 2013 Street Survey Braemar Hills Gleason Lake Edina Mendelssohn Normandale St. Patrick's November 6L3uk e Reconstruction --- Results B Neighborhood Circle Neighborhood A Neighborhood Neighborhood Lane 18, 2014 y 1 CITY OF EDINA Question #2: How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Very iffectiNto Somewhat effective 2013 2012 81% 63% 87% 74% 70% 42% City Meetings Mailed Correspondence City of Edina Website cstIA.44,;. CITY OF EDINA Question #3: How effective was the communication you received during construction? Very effective to Somewhat effective 2013 2012 City Meetings 53% 39% Mailed Correspondence 86% 71% Weekly Email Update 81% 76% Monthly Mailed Updates 73% 60% City of Edina Website 52% 41% V.VAV EdinaLIN gov 12/10/2014 2 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA Did you find the Open House to be beneficial in answering your questions or addressing your concerns? Question #4: The project is funded between City Utility Funds (approximately 60 percent) and Special Assessments (approximately 40 percent). Were the specific project costs explained to you in a manner that you could understand? 2012 Yes 42% No 23% vevimEdInaSIN.gov CITY OF EDINA Question #5: vemv.EilnatiN.gov 1. 2012 Yes 29% No 23% •Yes •No Y - es No OF did not attend the Open House 3 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA Question #6: How effective was the project team in working to minimize your level of nconverdence during the project? Very effective to Somewhat effective 2013 2012 81% 76% mw.EdinaMN.gov Question #7: During construction, did you know the name of your City representative? 30% 70% 2012 Yes 50% No 50% vomv.EdinaMN.gov 4 During construction, aside from weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with ample notices of water shut-offs, driveway access, etc.? •Yes •No CITY OF EDINA Question #8: 1 2012 Yes 70% No 25% v,,,EdInaNIN.gov During any phase of the project, did you experience any conflicts in dealing with the project? •Yes a N. [7012 Yes 50% No 41% CITY OF EDINA Question #9: - Phone/internet disruption - Sprinkler/pet fence damaged - Driveway blocked - Storage of construction equipment - Yes, but crew was accommodating - Waiting for equipment to move - Poor restoration by private utility company Edm,?.11.1 goy 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA st1A Question #10: What aspects of the project process met your expectations and why? - Communication - Friendly, courteous, polite, accommodating, organized project team - New infrastructure - looks good! - Responsiveness - Project on schedule - Project is done - Orderly, well-planned and executed - None vAmEdinaMN.gov CITY OF EDINA Question #11: What aspects of the project did not meet your expectations and why? - None - Cost - Communication - Hydroseeding/restoration/personal cost to restore sod - Damaged sprinklers - Inconvenience factor - Utility interruptions - Length of project - Not including streetlights - Noise/dust/odor vx.N:,,EdInatal gov 12/10/2014 6 CITY OF EDINA Question #12: Did the final result of the project meet your expectations? D yes II No 2012 Yes 56% No 34% wamEdinaLIN.gov CITY OF EDINA Question #13: Do you have any other comments, input or suggestions for City staff on street reconstruction projects? - Better communication between City, residents and private utility companies - Open house end of project to address concerns - Weekly email updates were best communication and accurate - Implement Complete Streets -Adjust water bill for lawn restoration - Staff worked hard to make process as smooth as possible - Complete project in shorter time frame - Project delay because contractor work multiple projects at once - Streetlights would have been nice 12/10/2014 7 Thank You! To the residents for their patience and participation in their projects. Questions / Comments* CITY OF EDINA AK 12/10/2014 CITY OF EDINA MendeVssohn A Neighborhood Restoration Update Resident Comment fr rn October 21 Assessment Hearing 8 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: December 18, 2014 Subject: Capital Improvement Plan Transportation Projects Action Requested: None. Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action DI Discussion El Information Information / Background: Several Commissioners have requested that they be provided with a list and description of transportation- related projects in the recently-developed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Attached are the pages of the CIP that provide project names, descriptions, estimated expenditures and projected year(s) of implementation. These projects come from the engineering department budget, with the exception of the first two projects, which are in the Administration & HRA budget. Attachments: Capital Improvement Plan: Transportation-Related Projects 2014-2019 Anticipated Street Reconstruction & Maintenance G: \ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Transportation Commission\ Agendas & RR's\ 2014 R&R \ 20141218\ltem VI.B. Capital Improvement Plan Transportation Projects.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Status Active Description 1 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 milt 2019 City of Edina, MN Project If 15-218 Project Name HRA - France Ave & Til 62 Interchange Type Expansion Department Administration & HRA Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Previous project number was HRA-11-003. Improvements are proposed to the interchange at France Ave and Crosstown Highway 62. In recent years, Hennepin County has developed an improved design of this interchange that could reduce the potential for crashes. Hennepin County, however, currently does not have funding included in their CIP. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Reducing congestion will likely result in a reduction of air pollution. Justification France Avenue is a vital commercial corridor that serves the Greater Southdale commercial area as well as numerous residential neighborhoods. The interchange at Highway 62 is one of the most congested in the metropolitan area. This congestion leads to many crashes at the intersections to the on-ramps. By relieving the congestion, a reduction in crashes and an increase in overall safety should be achieved. This item supports three objectives in Edina Vision 20/20: - maintain strong residential neighborhoods, - accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina, and - take an active role in future redevelopment strategies. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 100,000 500,000 100,000 500,000 Total 100,000 500,000 600,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 100,000 500,000 600,000 Total 100,000 500,000 600,000 Page 28 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 1/1/1, 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-220 Project Name BRA - Grandview Development Studies Type New Department Administration & ERA Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Working in partnership to redevelop the former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Ave, the City will need to engage specialty consultants to help derive feasible and community-supported options for the site. Examples of consulting include: market study or in-depth facility study. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental efficiency will be one of the measures to be discussed and identified in this planning document. Justification The 2012 GrandView Development Framework outlines several implementation steps to achieve the community vision. The City should employ best-practice techniques to ensure that the future project on City-owned land meets the needs of the community and is successful in the marketplace. This item addresses three objectives in Edina Vision 2020: - Taking an active role in future redevelopment strategies, - Provide a level of City service that sets Edina apart from other communities, and - Maintain strong residential neighborhoods. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 50,000 50,000 Total 50,000 50,000 Planning/Design Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Tax Increment Funds Total Page 29 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 that 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-224 Project Name HRA - North Parking Ramp Expansion Type Expansion Department Administration & HRA Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Construct an expansion the North Parking Ramp at 50th and France to provide additional shared parking for customers and employees. The expansion is anticipated on City-owned property located at 3930 W. 49-1/2 Street. This land was acquired in 2013 for parking improvements. The expansion would follow the layout of the existing 3-level North Ramp and include commercial space on the street level to generate activity and interest between nearby businesses. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The facility is envisioned to follow industry best practices. Shared parking is more efficient than individually owned parking lots in a dense commercial district. The new structure will improve storm water conditions and will include LED lighting fixtures. Roof-mounted solar panels and electric vehicle charging stations could also be considered. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Maintenance and operating costs of the expanded ramp will be borne by the property owners in the 50th and France commercial area. Justification The 2011 Walker Parking Study and 2013 Kimley-Horn Feasibility Study both call for 140 to 200 new parking stalls to more adequately address peak demand in the 50th and France Commercial Area. This item addresses two objectives from Edina Vision 20/20: - Take an active role in redevelopment strategies, and - Provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design 200,000 200,000 Land Acquisition 2,650,000 2,650,000 Construction/Maintenance 6,000,000 6,000,000 Total 2,650,000 200,000 6,000,000 8,850,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Sales/Lease Revenue 2,000,000 2,000,000 Tax Increment Funds 2,650,000 200,000 4,000,000 6,850,000 Total 2,650,000 200,000 6,000,000 8,850,000 Page 33 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thin 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-225 Project Name HRA- Promenade Phase V Type Expansion Department Administration & HRA Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Extend the Promenade bicyclist/pedestrian route from 70th Street north to Highway 62. This is a dedicated route for bicyclists and pedestrians that is intended to better connect the commercial properties in Greater Southdale with the surrounding residential buildings and neighborhoods. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The purpose of the Promenade is to provide a safe and convenient route for bicyclists and pedestrians. The route can be used for both recreational and commuting purposes as a healthier alternative than driving. Justification The Promenade pathway originated in the 2007 Promenade Urban Design Plan. This project supports the Edina Vision 20/20 objectives: - Maintain strong residential neighborhoods, - Accommodate the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina, and - Take an active role in future redevelopment strategies This project will better connect the residential neighborhoods north of 66th Street and north of Highway 62 to commercial businesses in Greater Southdale. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 30,000 1,500,000 30,000 1,500,000 Total 30,000 1,500,000 1,530,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 30,000 1,500,000 1,530,000 Total 30,000 1,500,000 1,530,000 Page 34 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 Him 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-123 Project Name 54th Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Previous project numbers were PW-01-012 and PW-05-003. This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated 54th Street from Wooddale Avenue to France Avenue. This includes replacement of the entire pavement surface, reconstruction of the bridge at Minnehaha Creek, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, installation of bicycle lanes, sidewalk, and lighting, and upgrading public utilities (watermain and storm sewer). The project will meet current State Aid requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14,21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 2,530,000 2,530,000 Total 2,530,000 2,530,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 2,115,000 2,115,000 Special Assessments 142,000 142,000 Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 20,000 20,000 Study) Page 59 Monday. September 22, 2014 2015 Him 2019 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 85,000 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 168,000 Rate Study) Total 2,530,000 85,000 168,000 2,530,000 Page 60 Alonday, Sep/ember 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-124 Project Name Valley View Road Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Previous project number was ENG-13-009. This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive and the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard. This includes replacement of the entire pavement surface, replacement of curb and gutter, installation of new sidewalk and bike lanes, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). This will ensure the utilities and roadway section meets current State Aid requirements, and improves traffic flow through the intersection. This project will also begin to address the storm water issue at Sally Lane identified in the STS-406 Storm Water Report dated February 17, 2014. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,320,000 1,320,000 Total 1,320,000 1,320,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 880,000 880,000 Special Assessments 140,000 140,000 Page 61 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 Hint 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 20,000 20,000 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 20,000 20,000 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 220,000 220,000 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 40,000 40,000 Study) Total 1,320,000 1,320,000 Page 62 Monday, September 22. 2014 Previous project number was ENG-13-010. This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to Highway 62. This includes replacement of the entire pavement surface, installation of curb and gutter, installation of bicycle lanes, sidewalk, and upgrading public utilities. The project will meet current State Aid requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-125 Project Name Tracy Avenue Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 2,270,000 2,270,000 2,270,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 1,500,000 1,500,000 Special Assessments 200,000 200,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 145,000 145,000 Study) Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 55,000 55,000 Rate Study) Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total 2,270,000 Page 63 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 awn 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 90,000 90,000 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 30,000 30,000 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 220,000 220,000 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 30,000 30,000 Rate Study) Total 2,270,000 2,270,000 Page 64 Hominy, September 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-126 Project Name Parklawn Avenue Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description Previous project number was PW-00-074. This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated Parklawn Avenue from France Avenue to W 76th Street. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. The project will meet current State Aid requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,470,000 1,470,000 Total 1,470,000 1,470,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 740,000 740,000 Special Assessments 160,000 160,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 25,000 . 25,000 Study) Page 65 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 dim 2019 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 175,000 175,000 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 120,000 120,000 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 10,000 10,000 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 240,000 240,000 Rate Study) Total 1,470,000 1,470,000 Page 66 Alonday, Sep/ember 22. 2014 This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated W 62nd Street from Valley View Road to France Avenue. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. The project will meet current State Aid requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42,50 and 57. IDescription Capital Improvement Plan 2015 dui/ 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-128 Project Name W 62nd Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 2,450,000 2,450,000 2,450,000 2,450,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 1,534,000 1,534,000 Special Assessments 346,000 346,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 200,000 200,000 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 120,000 120,000 (Undetermined) Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Page 67 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 lbw 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 250,000 250,000 (Undetermined) Total 2,450,000 2,450,000 Page 68 Monday, September 22, 2014 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets [Birchcrest Drive, Clover Ridge, Roberts Place, Rolf Avenue, Tingdale Avenue, Valley View Road, W 60th Street, W 62nd Street, and Wilryan Avenue] within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface; repair, replacement or addition of curb and gutter; and major maintenance or upgrade of public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). Targeted installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements will also be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 /hut 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-129 Project Name Birchcrest B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Justification Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20, states; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 2,697,342 2697,342 Total 2,697,342 2,697,342 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 101,597 101,597 Special Assessments 1,299,529 1,299,529 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 113,388 113,388 Study) Page 69 Monday. Sep/ember 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 that 2019 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 113,219 113,219 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 605,648 605,648 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 362,364 362,364 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 91,654 91,654 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 9,943 9,943 Rate Study) Total 2,697,342 2,697,342 Page 70 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-130 Project Name Arden Park D Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Arden Avenue, Bruce Ave, Bruce Place, Gorgas Avenue, Halifax Avenue, Indianola Avenue, Jay Place, Juanita Avenue, Minnehaha Boulevard, W 51st Street, and W 52nd Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. It will also implement elements of the Living Streets Policy with possible funding and outreach completed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. This project will also include repair manholes and lining of sanitary trunk sewer on the oldest trunk sewer line in Edina, along Minnehaha Creek as described in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Infiltration Study Report (December 2013). ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 7,033,850 7,033,850 Total 7,033,850 7,033,850 Page 71 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Funding Sources Prior 2015 2015 aim 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 507,202 507,202 Special Assessments 2,092,870 2,092,870 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 625,584 625,584 Study) Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 624,656 624,656 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 1,003,157 1,003,157 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 600,198 600,198 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 1,425,529 1,425,529 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 154,654 154,654 Rate Study) Total 7,033,850 7,033,850 Page 72 Monday, September 22, 2014 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Claredon Drive, Dewey Hill Road, and Schey Drive) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 an 11 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-131 Project Name Prospect Knolls B Neighborhood St Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 674,890 674,890 Total 674,890 674,890 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 334,425 334,425 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 26,118 26,118 Study) Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 26,079 26,079 Rate Study) Page 73 Monday September'22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 /hot 2019 Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 134,814 134,814 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 80,661 80,661 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 65,669 65,669 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 7,124 7,124 Rate Study) Total 674,890 674,890 Page 74 Monday. Seplember 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 that 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-132 Project Name Countryside H Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Arbour Avenue, Amy Drive, Benton Avenue, Berne Circle, Grove Street, Merold Drive, Olinger Circle, Stuart Avenue, Sun Road, and Wycliffe Road) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 3,898,579 3,898,579 Total 3,898,579 3,898,579 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 235,760 Special Assessments 1,815,018 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 141,750 Study) Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 141,540 Rate Study) 235,760 1,815,018 141,750 141,540 Page 75 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 ihnt 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 731,674 731,674 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 437,767 437,767 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 356,404 356,404 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 38,666 38,666 Rate Study) Total 3,898,579 3,898,579 Page 76 Alwukiy..S'epiember 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-133 Project Name Dewey Hill G Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Bonnie Brae Drive, Hyde Park Circle, Hyde Park Drive, and Hyde Park Lane) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse, as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 624,289 624,289 Total 624,289 624,289 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 309,351 309,351 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 24,160 24,160 Study) Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 24,124 24,124 Rate Study) Page 77 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 that 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 124,706 124,706 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 74,613 74,613 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 60,745 60,745 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 6,590 6,590 Rate Study) Total 624,289 624,289 Page 78 Monday, September 22, 2014 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Beard Avenue, Beard Place, Chowen Avenue, Chowen Curve, Drew Avenue, Ewing Avenue, W 61st Street, W 62nd Street, and W 64th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. It will also begin to address the storm water issue identified in the STS-406 Storm Water Report dated February 17, 2014. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 Him 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-134 Project Name Strachauer Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruct Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 3,605,403 3,605,403 Total 3,605,403 3,605,403 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Futu re Total PACS Fund 40,612 40,612 Special Assessments 1,726,801 1,726,801 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 137,292 137,292 Study) Page 79 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 /hot 2019 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 132,229 132,229 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 946,519 946,519 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 246,082 246,082 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 333,944 333,944 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 41,924 41,924 Rate Study) Total 3,605,403 3,605,403 Page 80 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 filo/ 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-135 Project Name Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Concord Avenue, Concord Terrace, Golf Terrace, Lakeview Drive, Lexington Avenue, Lexington Street, Oak Drive, St. Johns Avenue, Tower Street, W 56th Street, and Woodland Road) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 5,670,719 5,670,719 Total 5,670,719 5,670,719 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 302,202 302,202 Special Assessments 2,032,988 2,032,988 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 371,231 371,231 Study) Page 81 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 ihni 2019 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 357,543 357,543 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 850,632 850,632 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 221,153 221,153 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 1,363,760 1,363,760 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 171,210 171,210 Rate Study) Total 5,670,719 5,670,719 Page 82 Monday, September 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thin 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-136 Project Name Morningside A/White Oak C Neighborhood St Recon Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Curve Avenue, Grimes Avenue, Sunnyside Road, Townes Circle, Townes Road, and W 45th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Removal of Lift Station #1 will be included with this project. It will also determine options to address the storm water issue identified by the neighborhood and being studied by Barr Engineering in 2014. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can axtend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 12, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 2,626,193 2,626,193 Total 2,626,193 2,626,193 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 51,734 51,734 Special Assessments 846,739 846,739 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 191,477 191,477 Study) Page 83 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 thru 2019 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 184,416 184,416 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 802,849 802,849 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 208,730 208,730 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 302,297 302,297 Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside 37,951 37,951 Rate Study) Total 2,626,193 2,626,193 Page 84 Holiday, Sep/ember 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 film 2019 • City of Edina, MN Project # 15-137 Project Name Normandale Park D Neighborhood Street Reconstruct Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active IDescription This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Creek Drive, Doron Drive, Doron Lane, Limerick Circle, Limerick Drive, Limerick Lane, and 64th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. This project will also study options for increasing the capacity of the regional storm sewer system between this neighborhood and the Birchcrest A / Countryside B Project also scheduled for 2017. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 3,586,713 3,586,713 Total 3,586,713 3,586,713 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 1,320,373 1,320,373 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 473,320 473,320 Study) Page 85 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 ihni 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 742,256 742,256 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 53,841 53,841 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 996,923 996,923 Study) Total 3,586,713 3,586,713 Page 86 Monday, September 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thin 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-138 Project Name Birchcrest A/Countryside B Neighborhood St Recon Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Miliner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Birchcrest Drive, Code Avenue, Colonial Court, Darcy Lane, Forslin Drive, Maddox Lane, Mildred Avenue, Porter Lane, W 60th Street, W 61st Street, W 62nd Street, and Wyman Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (AVatermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. This project will also study options for increasing the capacity of the regional storm sewer system between this neighborhood and the Normandale Park D Project also scheduled for 2017. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 4,660,288 4,660,288 Total 4,660,288 4,660,288 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 366,533 366,533 Special Assessments 2,078,110 2,078,110 Page 87 Monday, Sep/ember 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN 2015 that 2019 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 324,354 324,354 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 1,341,637 1,341,637 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 97,318 97,318 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 452,336 452,336 Study) Total 4,660,288 4,660,288 Page 88 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thni 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-139 Project Name Parkwood Knolls B Neighborhood Street Reconstruct Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Chalice Court and Malibu Drive) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 1,874,590 1,874,590 Total 1,874,590 1,874,590 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 140,828 140,828 Special Assessments 859,122 859,122 Utility Fund - Sewer (In Rate 134,093 134,093 Study) Utility Fund - Storm (In Rate 516,107 516,107 Study) Page 89 Monday, September 22, 2019 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 dint 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 37,437 37,437 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (In Rate 187,003 187,003 Study) Total 1,874,590 1,874,590 Page 90 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-140 Project Name Chowen Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active I Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Abbott Avenue, Beard Avenue, W 59th Street, York Avenue, and Zenith Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14,21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 2,423,369 2,423,369 Total 2,423,369 2,423,369 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 218,285 218,285 Special Assessments 1,092,674 1,092,674 Utility Fund - Sewer 170,546 170,546 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 704,025 704,025 (Undetermined) Page 91 Monday, September 22, 2014 2,423,369 2,423,369 Total Capital Improvement Plan 2015 tiwii 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 237,839 237,839 (Undetermined) Page 92 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15441 Project Name Chowen Park B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active IDescription This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Chowen Avenue, Drew Avenue, Ewing Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. It will also begin to address the storm water issue identified in the STS-406 Storm Water Report dates February 17, 2014. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 2,303,790 2,303,790 Total 2,303,790 2,303,790 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 158,068 158,068 Special Assessments 651,973 651,973 Utility Fund - Sewer 101,761 101,761 (Undetermined) Page 93 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 awn 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Water (Undetermined) 1,250,075 1,250,075 141,913 141,913 Total 2,303,790 2,303390 Page 94 Monday„'S'epiember 22. 2014 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Glasgow Drive, Lochmere Terrace, Long Brake Circle, Long Brake Trail, Marth Court, Shaughnessy Road, Stonewood Court, and Tanglewood Court) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 //wit 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-142 Project Name Dewey Hill B-E Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy.'' This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 4,386,347 4,386,347 4,386,347 4,386,347 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 1,758,815 1,758,815 Utility Fund - Sewer 546,573 546,573 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 975,801 975,801 (Undetermined) Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Page 95 Monday, September 22, 2014 4,386,347 4,386,347 Total Capital Improvement Plan 2015 dirit 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 1,105,158 1,105,158 (Undetermined) Page 96 Alonday, September 22. 2014 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Brookview Avenue, Peacedale Avenue, and Philbrook Lane) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. IDescription Capital Improvement Plan 2015 aim 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-143 Project Name Concord D/Pamela Park B-E Neighborhood St Recon Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 2,825,005 2,825,005 2,825,005 2,825,005 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 1,069,793 1,069,793 Utility Fund - Sewer 383,493 383,493 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 563,992 563,992 (Undetermined) Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Page 97 Monday, September 22, 2014 2,825,005 2,825,005 Total Capital Improvement Plan 2015 tint 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 807,727 807,727 (Undetermined) Page 98 Monday Sep/ember 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-144 Project Name Indian Hills C/Creek Valley B Neighborhood St Rec Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority I Critical Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Gleason Terrace, Rosemary Lane, and St. Albans Circle) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42,50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, cottnty, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 367,447 367,447 Total 367,447 367,447 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 182,079 182,079 Utility Fund - Sewer 28,419 28,419 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 117,316 117,316 (Undetermined) Page 99 Monday, September 22, 2014 367,447 367,447 Total Capital Improvement Plan 2015 /hi if 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 39,633 39,633 (Undetermined) Page 100 Alonday, September 22. 2014 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Arbour Avenue, Arbour Lane, Jeff Place, and W 61st Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. I Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thni 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-145 Project Name Countryside I Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 1,402,197 1,402,197 1,402,197 1,402,197 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 694,824 694,824 Utility Fund - Sewer 108,449 108,449 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 447,684 447,684 (Undetermined) Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Page 101 Monday, September 22, 2014 1,402,197 1,402,197 Total Capital Improvement Plan 2015 mil/ 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 151,240 151,240 (Undetermined) Page 102 Monday, September 22. 2011 This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Antrim Court, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Down Road, Dublin Circle, Dublin Road, Kerry Road, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive, Tralee Drive, Wexford Road, and W 70th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 1//ru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-146 Project Name Prospect Knolls A Neighborhood Street Reconstruct Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 2,933,396 2,933,396 Total 2,933,396 2,933,396 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments 1,453,571 1,453,571 Utility Fund - Sewer 226,875 226,875 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Storm 936,555 936,555 (Undetermined) Page 103 Monday, September 22, 2014 2,933,396 2,933,396 Total Capital Improvement Plan 2015 Him 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water 316,395 316,395 (Undetermined) Page 104 Monday, September 22, 2014 This project includes the realignment of lanes on Municipal State Aid designated Tracy Ave, Valley View Road, and Valley Lane, and the construction of a roundabout at their intersection. This includes replacement of the entire pavement surface, replacement of curb and gutter, alterations to bicycle lanes, sidewalk, and lighting, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). This will ensure the utilities and roadway section meets current State Aid requirements, and improves traffic flow through the intersection. It will provide for a safer pedestrian crossing for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and also address speed and queueing concerns. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-151 Project Name Valley View, Tracy Ave, Valley Ln Roundabout Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "upgrade existing roadways when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety, or functional needs." The recommended scheduling is based on the need to improve current traffic flow operations in the area, and may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 895,000 895,000 Total 895,000 895,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 700,000 700,000 PACS Fund 50,000 50,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 25,000 25,000 Rate Study) Page 105 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) Utility Fund - Water (Outside Rate Study) 80,000 40,000 2015 thru 2019 80,000 40,000 895,000 Total 895,000 Page 106 Monday. September 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 /hi 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-152 Project Name Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction (with boulevard) along the south side of Municipal State Aid designated Interlachen Boulevard from Oxford Avenue to Bedford Avenue, and William Avenue to Vernon Ave. This new sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk between Bedford Avenue and William Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. This sidewalk is indicated as a future sidewalk on the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan, and is recommended in the approved Edina Active Routes to School Plan. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 166,000 166,000 166,000 166,000 Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Funding Sources PACS Fund Total Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 166,000 166,000 166,000 166,000 Page 107 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 111,11 2019 City of Edina, MINT Project # 15-153 Project Name Vernon Road Sidewalk Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves concrete sidewalk (with boulevard) construction along the north side of Vernon Avenue from Gleason Road to Blake Road. This new sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalks on Blake Road and Vernon Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe wallcing, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. This sidewalk is indicated as a future sidewalk on the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 246,000 246,000 246,000 246,000 Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 246,000 246,000 246,000 246,000 Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Funding Sources PACS Fund Total Page 108 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 aim 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-154 Project Name Oaklawn Avenue Sidewalk Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction along the east side of Oaklawn Avenue from W 72nd Street to the cul-de-sac just south of Gilford Avenue. This new sidewalk will connect to existing sidewalks on W 72nd Street near Cornelia Elementary School, and to the Edina segment of the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail on Parklawn Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to maintaining strong residential neighborhoods, providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. This sidewalk is indicated as a future sidewalk on the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan, and is recommended in the approved Edina Active Routes to School Plan. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Funding Sources PACS Fund Total Page 109 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 th//1 2019 City of Edina, MN 1 Project # 15-155 Project Name Xerxes Avenue South Sidewalk Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction (with boulevard) along the west side of Xerxes Avenue South from W 56th Street to W 60th Street. This new sidewalk will fill an existing pedestrian facilities gap on Xerxes Avenue between those intersecting streets, as sidewalks exist both north and south of this project. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks and bicycle facilities support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 240,000 240,000 480,000 240,000 240,000 480,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 240,000 240,000 480,000 240,000 240,000 480,000 PACS Fund Total Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Page 110 Monday, September 22. 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-156 Project Name W 64th Street Sidewalk Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction along the south side of W 64th Street from York Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. This new sidewalk will connect to existing sidewalk on Xerxes Avenue and to a RRFB (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) pedestrian crossing to be installed by Hennepin County across Xerxes Avenue in 2014. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. This sidewalk is indicated as a future sidewalk on the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 37,000 37,000 37,000 Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 37,000 37,000 37,000 Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total 37,000 Funding Sources PACS Fund Total 37,000 Page III Monday, September 22, 2014 Project # 15457 Project Name W 65th Street Sidewalk Capital Improvement Plan 2015 any/ 2019 City of Edina, MN Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Category Unassigned Priority 1 Critical Status Active Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction (with boulevard) along the south side of W 65th Street from Valley View Road to Fiance Avenue. This new sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalks on Valley View Road and France Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. This sidewalk is indicated as a future sidewalk on the draft Sidewalk Facilities Plan. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 53,000 53,000 53,000 Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total 53,000 Funding Sources PACS Fund Total Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 53,000 53,000 53,000 53,000 Page 112 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-127 Project Name W 58th Street Reconstruction Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Previous project number was PW-04-001. This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated W 58th Street from France Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. The project will meet current State Aid requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50 and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 150,000 1,100,000 1,250,000 Total 150,000 1,100,000 1,250,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 150,000 880,000 1,030,000 Special Assessments 140,000 140,000 Utility Fund - Sewer 20,000 20,000 (Undetermined) Page 117 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 Ihrif 2019 City of Edina, 1VLN Utility Fund - Storm 20,000 20,000 (Undetermined) Utility Fund - Water 40,000 40,000 (Undetermined) Total 150,000 1,100,000 1,250,000 Page 118 Monday, Sep/ember 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-167 Project Name Greater Southdale Traffic Model Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active IDescription Create a dynamic traffic model that can be used to determine re-development impacts throughout the Greater Southdale region. The model would reflect existing conditions within Hwy 62 on the north, Xerxes/York Ave. on the east, Hwy 494 on the south and Valley/View/France Ave. on the west. It will be adaptable so that the impact of different land uses can be evaluated. The model will primarily address motorized traffic and will also consider pedestrians and bicyclists traveling through the area. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: A computer-based modeling program can help reduce traffic delays and resulting air pollution within this heavily traveled commercial district. COST CONSIDERATIONS: This model will be helpful to evaluate future redevelopment proposals as well as traffic improvements in the Greater Southdale area. Justification The Greater Southdale area is a vital hub of commercial, health care and residential activity for Edina and surrounding communities. Based on recently completed investments in the area and the high interest level for additional redevelopment of aging properties in the area, a comprehensive and dynamic traffic model is warranted. This model will allow the City to more fully evaluate the impact of proposed land use and transportation changes in the area. Based on the information generated, the City should be able to more clearly advocate for additional improvements by partners at the County, Regional and State levels. This item addresses two objectives in Edina Vision 2020: --accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina, and --taking an active role in future redevelopment strategies. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 125,000 125,000 125,000 Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 125,000 125,000 125,000 Expenditures Planning/Design Total 125,000 Funding Sources Tax Increment Funds Total 125,000 Page 120 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thm 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-168 Project Name Grandview Transportation Study Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Prepare a comprehensive transportation plan for the long-term redevelopment of the GrandView District. The document would provide proposed improvements that can be installed on an as-needed basis in the future. The work would include 30% preliminary design on the elements that require coordination with Hennepin County and MnDOT. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This area provides few facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. There are also few pedestrian connections between the commercial businesses and the Grandview, Melody Lake and Todd Park residential neighborhoods immediately adjacent to the businesses. Such improvements can reduce the need to drive to this area. COST CONSIDERATIONS: A flexible capacity model can be helpful as the City evaluates possible land use changes in the years ahead. Justification The 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies the GrandView area as a potential area of change (Page 4-33). In addition to potential land use changes, re-alignment of roadways and better coordination of multi-modal users is likely so that residents can more easily cross through this busy area and safely cross Highway 100. The 2007 Bicycle Plan identifies primary and secondary bicycle routes as well as a potential regional trail in the GrandView area. The 2012 GrandView Development Framework outlines many suggested changes to improve the walkability and desirability of the area. The proposed Transportation Plan will evaluate different alignments and identify the preferred routes. This document will better guide new public and private investments in the area. Preliminary design documents will be needed so that the City can coordinate with other agencies having jurisdiction over Vernon Avenue and Highway 100. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Expenditures Planning/Design Total Funding Sources Tax Increment Funds Total Page 121 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thru 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-176 Project Name Pentagon Park - W 77th Street Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Reconstruct approx. 3,610 lineal feet of W. 77th Street from the Highway 100 interchange to Parklawn Avenue. This city street is currently configured with 5-lanes, including a continuous two way left turn lane. While this street remains functional, the configuration does not serve future development plans. The Pentagon Park developer intends to rebuild the road to better serve users of the existing and new facilities. The new roadway will remain 2-lanes in each direction. The center lane will be reconfigured to include left turn bays and a landscaped median. 10' boulevards and 6' concrete sidewalks will be added on each side of the street. Pedestrian lighting and intersection lighting will also be added. The existing right-of-way is 66 feet wide. Additional ROW or easement may need to be acquired to accommodate the improvement. The cost of acquiring such easement is not included in this estimate. COST CONSIDERATIONS: The project cost uses $728/LF. The cost of the reconstruction is anticipated to be borne by the Developer with reimbursement from the Pentagon Park TIF District. A portion of the cost may be assessed (via the MN 429 process) to adjacent property owners who benefit from the improvement. Justification The 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Pentagon Park as a potential area of change (page 4-33). In March 2014, the City Council approved preliminary rezoning of the site as well as the overall Development Plan. In May 2014, the City and the developer entered into a Redevelopment Agreement based on the approved plan. The plan call for a variety of new buildings as well as several new public roadways to better serve the area. Future routes are envisioned to address the needs of drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders. The elements of the preliminary plan are intended to be implemented in phases based on market demand. All improvements will be constructed in accordance with City standards and other applicable regulations. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 150,000 2,735,000 150,000 2,735,000 Total 150,000 2,735,000 2,885,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 150,000 2,735,000 2,885,000 Total 150,000 2,735,000 2,885,000 Page 123 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 ant/ 2019 City of Edina, MN Project II 15-177 Project Name Pentagon Park - 77th Street Bridge Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description A new bridge is anticipated on W. 77th Street, east of the Highway 100 interchange. This bridge is necessary to accommodate a new trail connection for pedestrians and bicyclists. The developer proposes this trail to better connect users of the Pentagon Park site to the Nine Mile Creek regional trail. At this time, specific details of the bridge size and design are not known. The cost estimate is based on two recent bridges that are similar in scale. A more refined estimate will be provided when the type and configuration of the bridge is further refined. COST CONSIDERATIONS: The cost of the bridge is anticipated to be borne by the Developer with reimbursement from the Pentagon Park TIF District. Justification The 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Pentagon Park as a potential area of change (page 4-33). In March 2014, the City Council approved preliminary rezoning of the site as well as the overall Development Plan. In May 2014, the City and the developer entered into a Redevelopment Agreement based on the approved plan. The plan call for a variety of new buildings as well as several new public roadways to better serve the area. Future routes are envisioned to address the needs of drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders. The elements of the preliminary plan are intended to be implemented in phases based on market demand. All improvements will be constructed in accordance with City standards and other applicable regulations. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 150,000 2,415,000 150,000 2,415,000 Total 150,000 2,415,000 2,565,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 150,000 2,415,000 2,565,000 Total 150,000 2,415,000 2,565,000 Page 124 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 aim 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-178 Project Name Pentagon Park - Viking Drive and Computer Avenue Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description As part of the redevelopment of the Pentagon Park South parcel, the adjacent supporting streets will need to be improved. Work is anticipated to the Highway 100 east frontage road (Normandale), Viking Drive and Computer Avenue; approx. 3,700 lineal feet. The existing pavement is anticipated to be maintained and the roadway would be re-striped to include 12 thru lanes and 10' parking lanes. Additionally, 10' boulevards and 6' sidewalks would be added to both sides. Pedestrian lighting and landscaping would also be added. Additional right-of-way or easements may be necessary, but are not included in the cost estimate since they could be donated from the developer. COST CONSIDERATIONS: The cost is based on $439/LF. The cost of this work is anticipated to be borne by the Developer with reimbursement from the Pentagon Park TIF District. Justification The 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Pentagon Park as a potential area of change (page 4-33). In March 2014, the City Council approved preliminary rezoning of the site as well as the overall Development Plan. In May 2014, the City and the developer entered into a Redevelopment Agreement based on the approved plan. The plan call for a variety of new buildings as well as several new public roadways to better serve the area. Future routes are envisioned to address the needs of drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders. The elements of the preliminary plan are intended to be implemented in phases based on market demand. All improvements will be constructed in accordance with City standards and other applicable regulations. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 150,000 1,525,000 150,000 1,525,000 Total 150,000 1,525,000 1,675,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 150,000 1,525,000 1,675,000 Total 150,000 1,525,000 1,675,000 Page 125 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 aim 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-179 Project Name Pentagon Park - 76th Street Type New Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description 76th Street is a new east-west roadway anticipated along the north side of the Pentagon Park property. It is approx. 3,460 lineal feet, located adjacent to the Nine Mile Creek regional trail and the City-owned Fred Richards land. The new street would connect three future north-south streets that are located on the Pentagon Park land. This street would be designed for low travel speeds and would not be designated as a truck route. The proposed roadway includes rivo - 12' travel lanes and two - 10' parking lanes. A 10' boulevard and 6' concrete sidewalk are anticipated on the south side and a 10' boulevard and 10' bituminous trail are anticipated on the north side of the street. The total project cost anticipates soil stabilization. COST CONSIDERATIONS: The cost is based on $2,144/LF. The cost of this work is anticipated to be borne by the Developer with reimbursement from the Pentagon Park TIF District. Justification The 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Pentagon Park as a potential area of change (page 4-33). In March 2014, the City Council approved preliminary rezoning of the site as well as the overall Development Plan. In May 2014, the City and the developer entered into a Redevelopment Agreement based on the approved plan. The plan call for a variety of new buildings as well as several new public roadways to better serve the area. Future routes are envisioned to address the needs of drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders. The elements of the preliminary plan are intended to be implemented in phases based on market demand. All improvements will be constructed in accordance with City standards and other applicable regulations. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 150,000 7,675,000 150,000 7,675,000 Total 150,000 7,675,000 7,825,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 150,000 7,675,000 7,825,000 Total 150,000 7,675,000 7,825,000 Page 126 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 dim 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-180 Project Name Pentagon Park - Green Streets Type New Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Bill Neuendorf Category Infrastructure Priority 2 Status Active Description Three new "Green Streets" are anticipated as part of the Pentagon Park redevelopment. Total length is approx. 1,880 lineal feet. These streets run north-south and connect 77th Street and the future 76th Street. They could also provide improved public access to the Nine Mile Creek regional trail and the City-owned Fred Richards site. These streets would terminate at 76th Street and would not connect to the Lake Edina residential neighborhood to the north. They are envisioned with slow travel speeds and not designated as truck routes. The new roadways are anticipated to include two - 12 thru lanes and two - 10' parking lanes. In addition, the street will include 6' boulevards and 6' concrete sidewalks on each side of the street. Right-of-way is anticipated to be donated. COST CONSIDERATIONS: The cost is based on $2,187/LF. The cost of this work is anticipated to be borne by the Developer with reimbursement from the Pentagon Park TIF District. Justification The 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Pentagon Park as a potential area of change (page 4-33). In March 2014, the City Council approved preliminary rezoning of the site as well as the overall Development Plan. In May 2014, the City and the developer entered into a Redevelopment Agreement based on the approved plan. The plan call for a variety of new buildings as well as several new public roadways to better serve the area. Future routes are envisioned to address the needs of drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders. The elements of the preliminary plan are intended to be implemented in phases based on market demand. All improvements will be constructed in accordance with City standards and other applicable regulations. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Planning/Design Construction/Maintenance 150,000 4,170,000 150,000 4,170,000 Total 150,000 4,170,000 4,320,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Tax Increment Funds 150,000 4,170,000 4,320,000 Total 150,000 4,170,000 4,320,000 Page 127 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 ihni 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-159 Project Name RRFB Pedestrian Crossings Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Equipment Priority 5 Important Status Active Description This project involves installation of rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RREBs) at designated pedestrian crossing throughout Edina. RRFBs are user-actuated flashing LEDs that supplement warning signs at unsignalized intersections or mid-block crosswalks. They have been shown to significantly increase driver yielding behavior when used in conjunction with traditional pedestrian crossing warning signs. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. This project follows the draft Living Streets Plan design guidelines to "provide frequent, convenient, and safe street crossings." Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 10,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings Total Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 10,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 Funding Sources PACS Fund Total Page 133 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thin 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-165 Project Name Valley View Road/Valley Lane Bridge Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 5 Important Status Active Description This project involves the reconstruction of the box culvert at Valley Lane and Nine Mile Creek. The existing box culvert and roadway are in need of repair per our annual bridge inspections. This project could be bundled with 15-151, the Tracy Ave, Valley View Road, and Valley Lane Intersection Project to realize economies of scale savings. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the road surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 150,000 150,000 150,000 Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total 150,000 Funding Sources Municipal State Aid Total Monday, September 22, 2014 Page 134 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 //In/ 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-174 Project Name 54th Street (Gravel Road West of Xerxes Avenue) Type Replace or repair Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 5 Important Status Active Description This project involves upgrading the existing 54th Street gravel road to an asphalt street. This includes grading of the existing street, installation of a new bituminous surface, installation of curb and gutter, and upgrading the storm sewer system within the project area. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50, and 57. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "continue to improve the aging infrastructure of the City." The recommended scheduling is based on the age and condition of the road surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 220,000 220,000 Total 220,000 220,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Special Assessments Utility Fund - Storm (Outside Rate Study) 170,000 50,000 170,000 50,000 Total 220,000 220,000 Page 137 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 thrif 2019 City of Edina, MN Project 15-158 Project Name On-Street Bike Facility Pavement Markings Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 6 Status Active IDescription This project involves the installation of pavement markings and signage for bicycle facilities at locations to be determined throughout the City of Edina. These locations will be based on the City's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and as opportunities arise, often coincident with roadway improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Bicycle facilities support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 50,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total 50,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 PACS Fund Total Expenditures Construction/Maintenance Total Page 139 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 111111 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-160 Project Name Miscellaneous Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 7 Desirable Status Active IDescription This project involves the installation of concrete sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and pavement markings/signage for bicycle facilities at locations to be determined throughout the City of Edina. These locations will be based on the City's Sidewalk Facilities Plan and Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan and as opportunities arise, often coincident with roadway improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks and bicycle facilities support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "a sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and draft Living Streets Plan strives to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 49,000 113,000 267,000 638,000 1,015,000 2,082,000 Total 49,000 113,000 267,000 638,000 1,015,000 2,082,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total PACS Fund 49,000 113,000 267,000 638,000 1,015,000 2,082,000 Total 49,000 113,000 267,000 638,000 1,015,000 2,082,000 Page 149 Monday, September 22, 2014 This project includes the realignment of lanes on Municipal State Aid designated Dewey 11111 Road and Cahill Road, and the construction of a roundabout at their intersection. This includes replacement of the entire pavement surface, replacement of curb and gutter, alterations to bicycle lanes, sidewalk, and lighting, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). This will ensure the utilities and roadway section meets current State Aid requirements, and improves traffic flow through the intersection. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Future pavement maintenance to extend the lifespan of the pavement through the use of seal coats and mill & overlays. This maintenance can extend the life of the pavements from 20-25 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance should be performed in years 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 50, and 57. Description Capital Improvement Plan 2015 air" 2019 City of Edina, MN Project # 15-175 Project Name Cahill Road/Dewey Hill Road Roundabout Type Expansion Department Engineering Useful Life Contact Chad Millner Category Infrastructure Priority 7 Desirable Status Active Justification As stated in Edina's 2000 strategic plan, Vision 20/20; "streets, utilities, parks, and public buildings are the essential components of the foundation of our city. A sound public infrastructure encourages the development of a stable private infrastructure, leading to an enhancement of the sense of quality that Edina has and will enjoy." This project follows Vision 20/20 strategies related to providing capital investments that balance need and affordability, and accommodating the efficient movement of people and goods in and around Edina. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "upgrade existing roadways when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety, or functional needs." The recommended scheduling is based on the need to improve current traffic flow operations in the area, and may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Expenditures Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Construction/Maintenance 350,000 350,000 Total 350,000 350,000 Funding Sources Prior 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Future Total Municipal State Aid 250,000 250,000 Utility Fund - Sewer (Outside 20,000 20,000 Rate Study) Utility Fund - Storm (Outside 40,000 40,000 Rate Study) Page 150 Monday, September 22, 2014 Capital Improvement Plan 2015 ihni 2019 City of Edina, MN Utility Fund - Water (Outside 40,000 40,000 Rate Study) Total 350,000 350,000 Page 151 Alomlay, September 22. 2014 City of Edina 2014-2019 Anticipated Street Reconstruction & Maintenance Presid ants E Todd Park D Pres kl ents A ProsH ents B In tertichen Park A Todd Park E MALONEY AVE Rolling Green HMI ale -- Todd Park C Presklents C Bredesen Park C GL E A S ON RD Biedesen Park A Bredesen Park B 1.1 dial" Hills E Indian Hills D In dian Hills F Arrowhead Lake Indian Hills A Arden ParkA Arden Park B MINA COUNTRY CLUB Golf To A Coll Ter-R1Ce Harvey Lake Minn ehaha Wood s A Nunn &Paha Woodsy Arden Park C WhitoOaks A TH ST W Country Club A Country Club B Country Club C Mo wIn aside C MOMIngsidtA MO. Milts C Ifr Sunny Slope WhIteOaks B Morningside D Legend Anticipated Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Ree onstuction Assess ment A rea s N Need to zoom Into map 01h. Eb see a nelshborhood area. NV October 2014 Engineering Dept. 54TH ST W Creek Knolls FR AN C E AV E S XE RX E S AV E S Brookview Heigh ts A Broo kview Heigh ts B Lake Cornelia A Lake Cornelia C Lake Cornelia B YO R K AV E S Lake Cornelia 0 Lake Cornelia E _L 1 • 70TH ST W Cab II Lake Edina Lake Edina Dewey Hill ADewey Hill F Dewey Hill E Dewey Hill D Dewey Hill C 41 0 B e-- + it) Parkwood Knolls M Presidents D PITERLACHEN Todd Park A in terlachen Park B COUNTRY CLUE - Parkwood Knolls K Tdd Park B Parkwood Knolls LPariwood KnollsJ NTERLACHEN BLVD- - • Highlands FHehlands E '7( Parkwood Knolls A Parkwood Knolls Fox Meadow F 04, I Parkwood Knolls 0 2 Parkwood Knolls C Fox Meadow B P Parkwood Knolls G arkwood Knolls D Parkwood Knolls N C) Parkwood Knolls B Parkwood Knolls P Fox Meadow E °Fox Meadow D m Fox Meadow C Fox Meadow G Highlands B Hig hlands A Highlands Lako Highlands D Big hlands C Grandview C Grandview 13 Gran dview A Melod y Lake D H4 ....) Parkwood Knolls C )rHer, d,..G.= Hawkas Lake Goan de F Countryside E Countryside D BREDESEN Countryside I Mud La ko Melody Lake A 44,0 `-"eMelody Lake C Melod y Lake B Concord F Concord E Pamela Park A Concord G 1.141 Concord H Ci- Concord A Pamela Park Lola mo Chowen Park C Minn ehaha Woods C Minn ehaha Woods B Pamela Park E 5/3TH ST W Chowen Park B Chowen Park A Parkwood Knolls F Parkwood Knolls E Fox Meadow A VS Norm an dale Park A Norm an dale Park B • Lake Cornelia F Elmo kview Heights D Brookview Heigh ts C - A Creek Valley A Concord B Pamela Park B C oncord C Concord Cr Pamela Park C Sou thda le C Lake Cornelia Sou thdale Sou thdale A WTH ST W Creek Valley C dlan Hills C brook Valley B VALLEY VIEW RD Braemar Hills D Branmar Hits C The Heights B Braemar Hits E - 70TH ST W Prospect Knots D Prospect Knots A Braemar Fills B Braemar Hits A The Heights A dla n Hills B Indianhe ad Lake (15 dlan Trails South Cornelia A South Cornelia B South Cornelia D South Cornelia C Parkbwn B Parklawn A 76TH ST W Edin borough Note/Disclaimer The dates shown on the map represent the anticipated years of construction and are subject to change based on budgetary issues, adjacent projects, resident input and other factors. Not all bituminous roadways within the City are shown. If a road is not highlighted then the potential reconstruction date is beyond the City's long term planning process. The City of Edina's street improvement policy is to assess residents for a portion of the roadway reconstruction costs. Public utility improvements are paid for from the City's utility fund. Extensive evaluation regarding the condition of the bituminous pavement, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main were used to set the priority of roadway improvements. To: Edina Transportation Commission Agenda Item #: VI. A. From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: December 18, 2014 Action Lii Discussion 121 Information REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Subject: Edina Challenge Transportation Priority Discussion Action Requested: None. Information / Background: A representative of the Edina Challenge Team (an Edina Community Foundation initiative) will attend the meeting to discuss the issue of meeting transportation needs of underserved youth in Edina. This was identified as a priority for the Edina Challenge, a collaborative effort organized by the ECF. Supporting materials for discussion are included. Attachments: Edina Challenge Team ETC Presentation G:\ PW \ CENTRAL SVCS \ TRANSPORTATION DIV \ Transportation Commission\ Agendas & RR's\ 2014 R&R \ 20141218 \ Item VIA. Edina Challenge Transportation Priority Discussion.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Working Together to Address the Transportation Gap for Disadvantaged Edina Youth Edina Challenge Team Presentation for the Edina Transportation Commission December 18, 2014 • Introductions • What is the Edina Challenge? • How Did the Edina Challenge Identify Transportation as a Priority Gap Area? • Summary of Initial Work • Explore Value of an Edina Transportation Commission Working Group on Identifying Solutions • Next Steps 2 Edina Challenge Number One: Helping people in Edina understand that we have over 750 youth in our community that qualify for Free and Reduced Price Meals. 2000- 2006- 2011- 2012- 2001 2007 2012 2013 Total Number of Students FRPM 195 500 741 750+ Percentage 2.8% 6.7% 8.98% 9.0%+ Source — Edina Public Schools' Presentation to League of Women Voters and Sun Current 12.5.2013 3 • Edina Challenge Number Two > Community. A collaborative effort of 14 community organizations led by the Edina Community Foundation > Help Youth. Support disadvantaged youth so they are able to develop as healthy productive adults. > Launched the team in March 2013. Followed discussions with the community in 2012 as part of the selection of Edina as one of the "100 Best Communities for Young People in America." 4 AGITYP eisi=1 crym, krFa. AT, Lig lanyititkv IIIV 'yMm..Efe. MALIN ETIElligNE5 -later "5 MI la E ort 1410$ E202LE WITfl tL. ruircLat.itzka4ClItam 4e-E ri City of Edina Park & Rec, Connecting with Kids, Edina Community Education, Edina Community Foundation, Edina Community Lutheran Church, Edina Education Fund, Edina GiveandGo, Edina Morningside Rotary Club, Edina Public Schools, Edina 'kesource Center, Oasis for Youth, One2One, Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church, Southdale YMCA Key Gaps. During 2013, the Edina Challenge team identified five key gaps, including transportation • Mentoring • Tutoring • Funds for extracurricular engagement • Housing Transportation — Transportation challenges prevent disadvantaged Edina youth from engaging in and taking full advantage of our Edina school and community resources. Solutions. The team endorsed five and funded three initial solutions — but given its complexity was not able to meaningfully address transportation. Mentoring — One2One and the Southdale YMCA Housing/Support — Oasis for Youth Tutoring/Support — Last Mile • Extracurricular Engagement — Ready, Set, Connect • Long-term Housing — ECLC 6 nn nr17. ! L Lill ---9forts on Transportation • Intern Research Brief Worked to address information Edina Challenge received from multiple areas that transportation gaps prevent youth from participating in activities, attending school, engaging in community recreation and obtaining employment. Began to identify solutions developed in other communities 0 Rideshare links, dial-a-ride, bike lending, extra buses, connector buses, alternative transportation networks, vouchers for bus passes and taxis, and others • Learning Discussion with ITN • Edina Challenge Working Group Session >- Gathered informal survey data from Edina School social workers and Edina Challenge participants • Gathering Information as part of the Mentoring Program 7 - Public transit stop at ECC and/or EHS - Volunteer drivers - Activity buses and other extra buses - Bus passes - Purchased mini-bus - Bikes Informal Survey Data • Informal survey data from Edina School social workers and Edina Challenge participants strongly support finding that transportation is an issue for disadvantaged youth in Edina. > Of 11 respondents, 10/11 strongly agree; 1/11 agree > 9/11 very frequently or frequently work with students who face transportation challenges • Narrative response examples highlight the challenges - Extracurricular activities - Community Ed programs - Medical appointments - Zero Hour classes - Jobs with Park & Rec and others - Early to school for help or make-up tests - Access to resources — Oasis for Youth - Access to Edina facilities — YMCA, ECC, etc. • Varied ideas for solutions described 8 Transportation Initial Thinking on Developing Solutions Timing Gaps Options Comments Destination School activity Summer employment School-year employment Appointments Summer activity - ITN Youth - Metro bus stop at EHS - Beeline - Bus pass - Taxi Voucher - Bike loan - Volunteer driver - Buy vans - Zip-car Partner with Edina Transportation Commission Consider other community solutions (WeCab — Mound) 9 • A Collaborative Working Group with Varied Expertise Could Develop Strategic and Systemic Solutions > Further Define the Problem/Gaps > Research and Work to Identify Alternative Solutions > Develop Range of Solutions for Consideration > Provide Recommendations for the City > Advocate Support Implementation 10 • Questions? • Interest in Moving Forward? • Timing? Thank you! Appendix: Income Limits for FRPM What are the income limits? Your child is eligible for free school meals if your household's gross income is not greater than 130% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines Your child is eligible for reduced price meals if your household's gross income is between 130% and 185% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines See Child Nutrition Programs: Income Eligibility Guidelines for more information. Free and Reduced Price School Meals Programs Gross Income Limits (Effective July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014) People in Household Free School Meals 130% FPG 185% FPG Reduced Price Meals Annual Monthly Annual Monthly 1 $14,937 $1,245 $21,257 $1,772 2 $20,163 $1,681 $28,694 $2,392 3 $25,389 $2,116 $36,131 $3,011 4 $30,615 $2,552 $43,568 $3,631 5 $35,841 $2,987 $51,005 $4,251 6 $41,067 $3,423 $58,442 $4,871 7 $46,293 $3,858 $65,879 $5,490 8 $51,519 $4,294 $73,316 $6,110 Each additional person +$5,226 +$436 +$7,437 +$620 12 1 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM NOVEMBER 20, 2014 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Olson, Rummel, Spanhake and Whited. ABSENT Member Iyer. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Whited to amend the meeting agenda to add new Item B. Sgt. Tim Olson. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 23, 2014 Motion was made by member Olsen and seconded by member Janovy to approve the amended minutes of October 23, 2014. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Former Public Works Site at Grandview – Redevelopment Plan Update Mr. Bill Neuendorf, economic development manager, updated the ETC on redevelopment plan for the former public works site. Mr. Neuendorf stated that the City Council partnered with Frauenshuh, Inc., and created an eight month process beginning in Dec. to identify what to do with the site. He said the ETC is invited to attend the first session on Dec. 4 where they will discuss strengths, weaknesses and opportunities. The expected outcome by the end of the process is to host an open house where they’ll have at least 2-4 optional designs that will have a combination of public/private features. From Dec. to Mar. they will hold a series of meetings to gather feedback and in May or June, the City Council is expected to make a final decision. Mr. Neuendorf said even though events are already scheduled, he is visiting each board and commission to seek feedback early in the process and the consultant is available if the ETC would like to meet with them. Discussion Member Nelson said he was involved in the initial discussions and transportation elements were discussed and, while the City isn’t planning new roads, he would like to make sure sidewalks and bike facilities are considered and included. Mr. Neuendorf said pedestrian connectivity, surveys, and the Living Streets Policy were forwarded to the consultant but it is still good to remind them of the importance. Member Janovy asked who will be the staff involved and Mr. Neuendorf said he is the lead staff, plus staff from each of the City’s departments. She asked about the traffic study scoping and timeline and Mr. Neuendorf said it was in the CIPP for 2014 but they are behind. He said the engineering department will lead the traffic study and he is hopeful that this will begin in quarter one of 2015. He said they do not have a funding source so they are waiting to identify other projects that they can partner with. Member Janovy said transportation improvements should precede redevelopment and asked how the phasing would be planned if they are waiting for funding. Mr. Neuendorf said phasing would be done with planning because they do not know what the exact needs are until the project is identified. In reference to the parking ramp, Mr. Neuendorf said they do not want a traditional parking ramp like there is today; he said a shared parking ramp that allows pedestrians and bikers is preferred. He said he is in discussion with Metro Transit staff and they are entertaining the idea of funding a park and ride in the ramp. He is not sure if the ramp would be horizontal or vertical. 2 Member Spanhake asked how the Grandview Crossing rendering fits in with the broader scope. Mr. Neuendorf explained that the current rendering was the framework that the City Council adopted as a vision plan. He said they will focus on the principles outlined in the plan as guiding documents more so than the rendering. She also asked about the lid over TH-100 and he said they submitted a grant for funding to Hennepin County but it was not approved. He said other cities have had success with lids but they are expensive. There is no timeline on the lid. Member Olsen asked if all options were on the table and Mr. Neuendorf said yes. He asked why a developer was picked and Mr. Neuendorf said they did not pick a developer; he said they wanted someone with development expertise to test their ideas and tell them which ones were possible. Chair Bass suggested a meeting with the consultant to have a focused conversation on the transportation challenges in the area. She suggested a joint meeting with the Planning Commission if they are interested. Member Nelson agreed and cited the Grandview Square Condominiums and said it was not a well thought out plan because residents cannot safely walk to Jerry’s and he does not want to see this repeated. Sgt. Tim Olson, Police Department Sgt. Olson said he visited to introduce himself because he was recently named the staff liaison to most boards and commissions, including the ETC. He said he also serves on the Traffic Safety Committee. He said the ETC can reach out to him with traffic related issues. Sgt. Olson was asked if it was illegal for vehicles to queue on the road to go thru Starbucks drive- thru at Grandview and he said he was not yet familiar with the issue at Starbucks but in general, there is a state law that addresses impeding traffic. Chair Bass thanked Sgt. Olson for coming and said it was good to have a contact in the police department. She said they have an annual meeting on their work plan with the police but it would be good to meet more often. Proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment Planner Nolan said on Nov. 3, the City Council tabled a motion to vote on the Sidewalk Facilities Map and closed the public hearing. He said at least one councilmember requested an advisory communication from the ETC. He updated the ETC on the four meetings that were held to gather feedback from residents. He said majority in the northwest quadrant were not in favor of sidewalks, while the others were more favorable. He said those on Speak Up, Edina! are overwhelmingly in favor and of the emails received recently, at least 80% are in favor. The ETC discussed concerns raised at the meetings by residents and acknowledged the validity of some concerns namely shoveling snow might be difficult for some elderly residents; however, they felt it was still important to move forward with the plan. They brainstormed key points to emphasize in the advisory communication and some suggestions were: • Importance of building out the network • Conservative plan (sidewalk not on every street) • Connects to destination • Plan is data driven (volume/speed) • Cost estimate for public works to do maintenance • Education • Plan is consistent with policy already adopted by City Council • Accept map in its entirety Regarding the 2015 Birchcrest Neighborhood Reconstruction and the sidewalk that City Council did not approve in 2014 for this neighborhood, member Nelson said this sidewalk is on the Sidewalk Facilities Map and he believes it should be constructed in 2015. He said if it is not constructed the road should at least be narrowed to accommodate the sidewalk at a future date. Member LaForce agreed. 3 Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to write an advisory communication to the City Council that is in strong support of the Sidewalk Facilities Map and to adopt it as presented. All voted aye. Motion carried. Member Boettge will write the advisory communication and members Olson, Janovy and Nelson will review. Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2015 A.1. Planner Nolan said this item is moving to Section C for further study. B.2. This item was moved to Section C for the following reasons: a. Review locations of ‘Speed Zone Ends Here’ signs to make sure they include all of the school property; b. Clarify the meaning of “When Children Are Present;” c. Check on the number of citations issued for the past year for violation of school speed zone. Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to revise the Nov. 5 report by moving A.1 and B.2 to Section C for further study and forward the revised report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members Member Campbell said he was pleased to see enforcement on 66th St. late one night (this area was referred to the police for enforcement based on feedback from member Campbell). Bike Edina Working Group – None. Living Streets Working Group – None. Walk Edina Working Group Motion was made by member Boettge and seconded by member LaForce to approve members Christine Bremer, Annette Gaughan, Lisa Strauss, Marie Pechman and Marcia Friedman, and student members Matthew Jensen, Aanik Lohani and Annika Beringer to the Walk Edina Work Group. All voted aye. Motion carried. Meetings are scheduled for the first Thursday of each month in the Community Room, City Hall, 6-8 p.m., starting Feb. 2015. Communications Committee Member LaForce thanked member Boettge for writing a blog post. Chair Bass asked for suggestions for future blog posts and member Rummel suggested a persuasive blog about why sidewalks are needed and another suggestion was to interview student members on Walk Edina to see why they decided to participate. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS – None. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Olson reported that a car went through the chain link fence that separates TH-62 and 64th St. again and not too far away a semi-truck tipped over. Planner Nolan said city engineer Millner left a message for MNDOT; however, it may be treated like the chain link fence on TH-100 where funding is not available but residents can chose to be assessed for its replacement. 4 Member LaForce noted that there are two different pedestrian flashers in the Southdale area near the Westin and he believes the one that flashes constantly is ineffective. Planner Nolan said it is scheduled for replacement. Member Janovy asked if planner Nolan was able to get an answer about the use of utility easements for sidewalk and he said no. She asked if it would make sense to add sidewalk as a criteria when prioritizing road reconstruction. Member Boettge said she was walking on 66th St. and the only vehicle that stopped for her to cross the street was a public works truck and she wanted to say thank you to the driver. Chair Bass said Chris Marshall with Edina Community Foundation reached out to her about attending the Dec. ETC meeting. Ms. Marshall directs Connecting with Kids that is working on Edina Challenge which is a steering committee that have identified five priority areas for underserved kids in the community and their goal is providing underserved kids with a total package of support to be fully contributing to the city and transportation was identified as an issue. STAFF COMMENTS • MNDOT is scheduled to redeck the France Ave Bridge over TH-62 in 2019 and City staff is working with MNDOT to see how they can make improvements in the area; ideas and layouts are being discussed, including a pedestrian bridge; Member Nelson said he contacted Fairview Hospital about adding the piece of missing sidewalk along France Ave in front of the hospital and they were receptive and is considering it. • Xerxes Avenue at TH-62 – Strachauer Park residents have been calling about the aesthetics of the bump outs and the Mayor arranged a meeting to discuss adding planters similar to the ones in downtown Minneapolis on 3rd Ave. next to Minneapolis City Hall. • A funding application was submitted for the Active Routes to School (ARTS) sidewalk on the west side of Cornelia School and along Oaklawn Ave; and staff is planning to submit an ARTS funding proposal for Cornelia Dr. from 66th St. to 70th St. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. 5 ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2014 NAME TERM J F* M A M J J A S O N D SM 2/27 SM 3/10 WS 3/18 # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 12 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% Boettge, Emily 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Campbell, Jack student 1 1 1 3 25% Iyer, Surya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 75% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Olson, Larry 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Rummel, Anna student 1 1 1 3 25% Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3 25% Spanhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Van Dyke, Jackson student 1 1 2 17% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% *Cancelled due to weather