Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-02-27 Meeting PacketMEETING CANCELLED DUE TO WEATHER AND RESCHEDULED FOR FEB. 27 AGENDA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM February 20, 2014 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of January 16, 2014 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During “Community Comment,” the Transportation Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight’s agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Active Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Education and Bicycle Parking Action Plan B. City Council Joint Work Session Planning C. Ordinance Discussion: Bicycling on Sidewalks D. Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 5, 2014 E. Transportation Options Workshop F. Updates i. Student Member ii. Bike Edina Task Force – Minutes of January 9, 2014 iii. Living Streets Working Group Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission February 20, 2014 Page 2 iv. Communications Committee VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Project Updates X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tuesday March 18 City Council and ETC Work Session 5:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday March 20 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday April 17 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday May 15 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday June 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday July 17 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday August 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday September 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission February 20, 2014 Page 3 G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas & RR's\2014 Agendas\20140220 Agenda.docx AGENDA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM February 20, 2014 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of January 16, 2014 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During “Community Comment,” the Transportation Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight’s agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Active Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Education and Bicycle Parking Action Plan B. City Council Joint Work Session Planning C. Ordinance Discussion: Bicycling on Sidewalks D. Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 5, 2014 E. Transportation Options Workshop F. Updates i. Student Member ii. Bike Edina Task Force – Minutes of January 9, 2014 iii. Living Streets Working Group iv. Communications Committee VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission February 20, 2014 Page 2 VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Project Updates X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tuesday March 18 City Council and ETC Work Session 5:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday March 20 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday April 17 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday May 15 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday June 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday July 17 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday August 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday September 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas & RR's\2014 Agendas\20140220 Agenda.docx 1 January 9, 2014 Meeting Notes Present: Don Eyberg, Rob Erickson, Sally Dunn, Jennifer Janovy, Peter Kelley, Larry Olson, Lori Richman Tim Sudeith Absent: Brad Schaeppi Guest: Nick Essma Recorded by: Sally Dunn I. Meeting called to order at 7:30 p.m. II. Action items a. Bike Edina status with the City —Members reviewed a draft relationship agreement. Members discussed whether the agreement would be part of the Bylaws and what the name of the organization would be since the group would no longer be a task force. Larry and Lori moved and Peter seconded that the agreement be forwarded to the city council. All approved. Larry moved that our name be changed to Bike Edina. Don seconded. All approved. Bylaws will be updated with new name at a later meeting. b. Incorporation—Members discussed whether to incorporate as a non-profit. Questions about cost, process, and if Bike Edina should also get insurance. Tim, Larry and Jennifer volunteered to get more information. Item to be discussed further next month. III. Discussion Items a. Bike Alliance MN draft active transportation, bike parking, education plan— Jennifer reported that this plan came out of a workshop held in the fall at Public Works. The draft plan was distributed last week. Questions about how the plan elements will be coordinated and who will have responsibility. Jennifer will try to connect with Nick Mason to get more information. 2 b. Education and Outreach Committee—Lori shared a draft outreach and communication plan that includes objectives for 2014. Members expressed support for the draft plan. Peter will take the draft and work on it further. c. ARTS Committee—Rob reported that the committee is still looking for a focus for 2014. Edinaʼs comprehensive ARTS plan will be discussed at ETC on January 16. d. Bicycle Friendly Community Committee—Sally has reviewed the application and found that it will require a significant time commitment. Jennifer will review the application and discuss with Mark Nolan. Applications are due in February. e. Infrastructure Committee—A brief discussion on upcoming streets for reconstruction, resurfacing and mill & overlay. Jennifer will connect with Mark Nolan to find out what resurfacing and mill & overlay projects will happen this year. f. New member outreach—Members were encouraged to contact people who may be interested in becoming members. Discussion of putting a brief article in the Sun Current to reach out to potential new members. IV. Next meeting—February 13 V. Adjourn at 8:57 p.m. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: February 20, 2014 Subject: Transportation Options Workshop Action Requested: No action requested. Agenda Item #: VI. E. Action Discussion Information 0 Information / Background: In April 2013 the ETC's Transportation Options Working Group recommended that the City Council authorize PRISM Express dial-a-ride transportation to expand into the City of Edina and to include appropriate funding, estimated in an amount of $10,000, in the 2014 budget, to cover a portion of the operating expenses to do so. A Human Services Grant for that amount was established. However, last Fall PRISM Express discontinued its dial-a-ride service and the Human Services Grant became unavailable. At the December 19, 2014 ETC meeting, commissioner Whited led a discussion about transportation options, with a focus on what steps to take (if any) to continue to look for a reasonably-priced, accessible and flexible transportation option for residents who do not meet eligibility guidelines for other services. At that time, the ETC decided to hold a workshop at a future meeting on this topic. Commissioner Whited will facilitate this workshop at the February ETC meeting. Attachments: ETC Advisory Communication: Transportation Options Working Group Formal Recommendation (presented to City Council on May 21, 2013) G: \ Engineering \ Infrastructure \ Streets \Traffic \ TRANSP COMM\ Agendas & RR's\ 2014 R&R \ 20140205 \ Item VIE. Transportation Options Workshop.docx City of Edina c 4801 W. 50,1, St. c Edina, MN 55424 Situation: Edina lacks a reasonable priced, accessible and flexible transportation option for residents who do not meet eligibility guidelines for other services. This type of service is critical to enable Edina residents to continue living in our city as they age and maintain independence. Background: The Edina Transportation Commission Transportation Options (ETC-TO) working group came together to review current transportation options and to make recommendations on additional transportation options for Edina residents, particularly senior and disabled citizens. Additionally the ETC-TO will recommend partnerships and outside sources of funding to meet these needs. The ETC-TO established an evaluation checklist to be used while they met with and reviewed the current transit options. The ETC-TO interviewed and reviewed the current transit options for the residents of Edina. In January 2013, two ETC-TO members made a formal presentation of their findings to the ETC. Attachments: Additional information regarding PRISM Express & demographics on the population it will serve. Edina Transportation Commission Advisory Communication Date: April 18, 2013 Subject: Transportation Options Working Group Formal Recommendation Assessment: The current transportation options for the residents of Edina include Metro Transit, Transit Link, Metro Mobility and VEAP volunteer driver transportation. Some senior living buildings have their own bus & taxi services. The ETC-TO's primary focus was assessing the services for Edina residents who: • are transit dependent and need to be transported in and around Edina, • require a different option than the "big bus" because it does not provide good intra- city circulation or door-to-door service. • May not meet the eligibility guidelines for physical limitations or income guidelines that other services require. This services serves everyone from the 40 year old temporary transplant from out of the country that is living in Edina and needs transportation to/from work to the 80 year old that uses a wheelchair but is not disabled enough to qualify for Metro Mobility and needs transportation to the doctor next week. (Metro Mobility has a three week application process) The ETC-TO did not review a taxi service because that service is not set up to serve the population that requires a standing order or needs multiple rides a month. Taxi service is expensive and generally is intended for the occasional ride. The ETC-TO did not review the individual senior living buildings bus options because they are not widely available. There are very few of these available in Edina and the vehicles operate on a set schedule of mainly recreational transportation options and may offer one day/week transportation to specific medical facilities. After meeting with and reviewing the Metro Transit "big buses", Transit Link & VEAP transportation options, the working group determined that these options are not all encompassing because they either require a walk to access the final destination, an application & wait period with physical requirements to ride, or have income guidelines and limitations on destinations. It was determined that PRISM Express is the all encompassing option for any resident in Edina because it does not have eligibility guidelines, no application, no wait period to ride, cost to ride is based on a sliding scale fee based on the rider's stated income, can transport riders to/from any destination within their service area (includes 7 other adjoining cities to Edina), vehicles are wheelchair lift-equipped, service is assistive door-to-door and is willing to grow and coordinate with other programs. PRISM Express has applied for the Metropolitan Council's New Freedom funding (from the Metropolitan Council) to cover the purchase cost of a wheelchair lift-equipped bus. The Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging funding (is set at a reimbursement per ride provided rate of $5.80 per ride) & the rider fares will both cover the other portion of the cost to operate PRISM Express in the City of Edina. (See attached PRISM Express Cost Share Policy with Sliding Fee Schedule for rider fare info. On average riders pay $3.50) The true cost per ride to operate this service is $10.98 per one way ride. Recommendation: ETC recommends that the council authorize PRISM Express dial-a-ride transportation to expand into the City of Edina and to include appropriate funding, estimated in an amount of $10,000, in the 2014 budget, to cover a portion of the operating expense to do so. Routing From Reviewed By To Action Requested Courtney L.B. Whited Katherine Bass & Tom LaForce Wayne Houle Distribute to the Council Place on Council agenda for April 2013 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Joe Feriancel< — Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: February 20, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 5, 2014 Agenda Item #: VI. D. Action Discussion El Information El Action Requested: Review and recommend Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of Wednesday, February 5, 2014, be forwarded to City Council for approval. Information / Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the meeting regarding any of the attached issues. An overview of the comments from the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be included in the staff report provided to Council for their March 18, 2014, meeting. Attachments: Traffic Safety Committee Report for February 5, 2014. G:\ Engineering \ Infrastructure \ Streets \ Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summaries\ 14 TSAC & Min \ 02-05-1 4 Cover.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 5001St. Edina, MN 55424 teliV Map: Sign location at corner of Benton Ave and Normandale Rd TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, February 5, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 5. The City Engineer, Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, Assistant City Planner and the Police Traffic Supervisor were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the February 20 Edina Transportation Commission and the March 18 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Request on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request for directional signs leading to the Normandale Lutheran Church. This request is from the Normandale Lutheran Church. They would like to add a directional sign near Benton Avenue and Normandale Road directing people straight ahead. Also, a second sign on West 50th Street near the TH 100 exit ramp, directing people south towards the church. These would not be the first Church directional signs placed in Edina; signs have been put up for Edina Community Lutheran, Good Samaritan, and St. Albans has placed signs in the past. City Code Section 36-1669. Church directional signs Church directional signs shall be permitted in all districts provided the total area of such signs shall not exceed four square feet per facing. Traffic Safety Report Page 1 of 12 February 5, 2014 Map: Sign location at corner of Eden Ave and Normandale Rd After review the staff recommends approval of directional signs. The signs must conform to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MNMUTCD). Also, approval from MNDOT is required if the signs are placed in their right of way. A2. Request to add directional signs to the main entrance of Creek Valley Elementary School. This request comes from the Creek Valley Elementary School. The school would like to add the signs to help visitors find the main entrance of the school. They would like to add a sign for northbound traffic on Gleason Road north of Creek Valley Road. This sign would indicate the main school entrance is ahead. fiLABIWASE. A Ai-. • _ Picture: Creek Valley Elementary Directional Sign Locations After review the staff recommends approval of a directional sign on Gleason Rd. north of Creek Valley Rd. The sign must conform to MNMUTCD standards. Traffic Safety Report Page 2 of 12 February 5, 2014 If it is assumed the intersection is to receive crosswalks as a result of the city council decision, a traffic gap study was performed to determine the type of markings for the crosswalk. The requirements can be found in the Appendix section 2A. The material for referencing the city council decision is located in the Appendix for review. This request was considered in the December 4, 2013 Traffic Safety Committee meeting. At the meeting the staff recommended denying the request since the intersection did not meet minimum warrants for pedestrians crossing in a two-hour window. After discussion the Edina Transportation Commission recommended looking further into the intersection. It was brought up that there was an agreement made in the April 21, 2008 special city council meeting to install crosswalks at this intersection. This request comes from a resident who lives in the area. The requestor states that vehicles are not stopping for pedestrians at the intersection of Grimes Avenue and Sunnyside Road. There is a stop sign on southbound Grimes Avenue. Curb ramps exists for crosswalks as shown in the picture. There are no recorded crashes at the intersection. Map: Sunnyside Rd and Grimes Ave SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: B1. Request for a painted crosswalk at the intersection of Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue. Picture: Sunnyside Rd and Grimes Ave from north The gap studies were done during the peak hour of 5:15 to 6:15 pm. The average gaps per 5 minute period for crossing Sunnyside Road were 16.8 gaps on the west side of the intersection and 19.1 gaps on the east side of the intersection. For over 5 gaps it is recommended to use pavement marking and signage only. After discussion staff recommends denying the request for a lack of warrants and from the minutes of the special meeting of the Edina City Council on April 21, 2008. Traffic Safety Report Page 3 of 12 February 5, 2014 Picture: Hazelton Rd and Lynmar Ln from the east 24 Hour Traffic Study Totals Thru Right Left U- Turn Peds Total WB 77 - 211 3 3 294 EB 45 14 - 1 5 65 NB - 304 38 0 2 344 Map: Hazelton Rd and Lymnar Ln B2. Request for a stop sign on Lynmar Lane at Hazelton Road. This request comes from a resident living near the intersection. The requestor states; vehicles dangerously turn onto Hazelton Road from Lynmar Lane at unsafe speeds. Drivers do not pay attention to traffic on Hazelton Road, making drivers on Hazelton Road yield to them to avoid collisions with pedestrians and parked cars. The requestor would like for a stop sign to be installed on Lynmar Lane. Currently this is an uncontrolled 3 way intersection which also has a driveway to an apartment complex on the north side. Hazelton Road, westbound curves to the north immediately after the intersection. Hazelton Road is approximately 29 feet wide, with parking on both sides of the street. There is a sidewalk on the south side of Hazelton Road. Lynmar Lane is approximately 28 feet wide, with no parking on the west side of the street. There are two recorded auto crashes at the intersection. Requirements for a stop sign can be found in the Appendix section 1A. A 24 hour traffic count was performed at the intersection. During the study a combined total of 703 vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians entered the intersection from all approaches. This is below the 2,000 units required. Below is the breakdown for the daily total turning movements at the intersection. The total traffic from Hazelton Road and Lynmar Lane were nearly the same, 359 and 344 respectively. After discussion the staff recommends denying the request for a lack of warrants. Traffic Safety Report Page 4 of 12 February 5, 2014 B3. Request for additional signage directing people to Ohms Lane at Metro Boulevard and 72'd Street. This request comes from a business in the complex at the corner of Ohms Lane and 72nd Street. The requestor states that visitors to their building are often driving all over the commercial area and up and down Ohms Lane trying to sort out where 7201 Ohms Lane is. The requestor would like to add signage to or near the W72nd Street sign at Metro Boulevard informing drivers Ohms Lane is to the west. This proposed sign would simply be Ohms Lane with an arrow. After discussion staff recommends denying the request. Map: Possible Ohms Lane Directional Sign Location Picture: Metro Blvd and 72"d St SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date: Cl. Request for the removal of the No Right Turn on Red sign at the intersection of Parklawn and 77th Street. This request comes from a former City of Edina employee. The requestor does not believe the No Right Turn on Red sign at the intersection of 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue serves any purpose. They would like to know why the sign was installed and see the sign removed. Traffic Safety Report Page 5 of 12 February 5, 2014 .rl'irtv44;44;;% A.443 -S1 " •••-tai. •TI • .1 I IA • I in 41 # •IA takktil Map: 77' Sr and Parklawn Ave Pirturp • 77 th çand Parkin-iv:1 AVP 11'0117 illP 17011h Parklawn Avenue southbound has 2 right turn lanes and one left turn lane. 77th Street westbound has 3 lanes with one left turn lane only. Eastbound 77th Street has 3 lanes with 2 left turn lanes. There is No Turn on Red signs for both westbound 77th Street and for southbound Parklawn Avenue. 2013 MSA traffic counts resulted in 8500 vehicles and an 85th percentile speed of 33.5 mph for Parklawn Avenue north of 77th Street. 2013 MSA traffic counts resulted in 13000 vehicles and an 85th percentile speed of 32 mph for 77th Street west of Computer Avenue There are 5 reported crashes at this intersection since 2009. This intersection was looked at during the December 3, 2008 traffic safety review. At the meeting staff recommended denial of the request to remove the No Turn on Red sign at southbound Parklawn Avenue to westbound 77th Street. This was based on a previous study done on this intersection. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. was contracted to study this intersection. They felt No Turn on Red was warranted because of the dual right turn lanes and pedestrian crosswalk SRF stated that allowing a right turn would provide little operational benefits. The traffic signal is set-up to return to the southbound right turn movement and eastbound left turn movement. The only time the southbound right turn should be red is during the westbound 77th Street movement. SRF stated that if the signal timing is optimal, there should be few opportunities to turn right on red during the heavier traffic volume times. Drivers may feel they are unnecessarily waiting during off-peak periods, but it should only be for a short amount of time. A traffic study was performed on this intersection. The peak hour was found to be from 4:45 to 5:45 pm. The average delay for vehicles making a right turn on southbound Parklawn Avenue was calculated. During the peak hour 115 vehicles stopped and 255 vehicles did not have to stop. The average delay for vehicles which had to stop at the light was 26 seconds. The average delay for vehicles traveling westbound of 77th Street was calculated. During the peak hour 195 vehicles stopped and 204 vehicles did not have to stop. The average delay for vehicles which had to stop at the light was 48 seconds. Traffic Safety Report Page 6 of 12 February 5, 2014 After discussion the staff recommends further study of the intersection to determine if the signal timing is optimal and to find the pedestrian impact on the intersection. Traffic Safety Report Page 7 of 12 February 5, 2014 APPENDIX Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue Crosswalk approval information from City Council Meetings MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 21, 2008, 7:00 P.M Mr. Houle called to the Council's attention the Edina Transportation Commission's Resolution calling for approval of the NE Edina Transportation Study Residential Safety Improvements, adopted by the Commission at their meeting April 17, 2008. Public Comment Mayor hovland stated his intent of calling upon Bruce Christensen to give an overview of the proposed compromise plan as per the e-mail sent April 21, 2008 from Bruce Chistensen to the Mayor and Council. An excerpt of the e-mail detailing elements of the proposed compromise follows; "4/18/08 — Proposed Compromise Traffic Plan 1. Elimination of all speed humps, horizontal street adjustments (street re-alignments, chokers, one-way triangles, etc). This will have a dramatic impact in reducing signage requirements. 2. Preserve the vast majority of pedestrian safety improvements. With a few minor exceptions described in number 4 below. Given that the realignment is not supported by the survey, the paver crosswalks should use existing curb cuts/boulevard connection, paths to sidewalk where possible. Paver selection & design biased toward minimum noise pollution. 3. Install 1 1/8th inch raised paver crosswalk at all entry points to the neighborhood. These raised crosswalks will signal drivers entering the neighborhood to slow down, and yet will not require additional signage when placed near stop signs. The raised crosswalks would occur at the following intersections: Country Club Road & Arden, Country Club Road & Bruce, Country Club Road & Wooddale, Wooddale & Sunnyside, Browndale & Sunnyside, on Sunnyside at Arden. Not certain where Country Club & Browndale. Conditions of acceptance include — no signage requirement and approval by Fire Chief & School District (school bus drivers). 4. We don't believe in using the islands at Wooddale & Country Club, Wooddale & Sunnyside, Edina Blvd. & Sunnyside, Drexel & Sunnyside, Casco & Sunnyside for pedestrian crosswalks. We'd prefer use of existing walks on north side of Sunnyside and south side of Country Club. Our reasoning is as follows: a. Safety — this requires crossing two streets versus one. b. Maintenance of the island and walkways may not occur. c. Natural pedestrian traffic is to the north side of Sunnyside and south side of Country Club roads. d. Loss of green space. e. Impairment of historic asset. 5. We also agreed that the City should reduce neighborhood speed limit to 25 mph." Jennifer Janovy, 4616 Inglewood Avenue, speaking on behalf of the Morningside Neighborhood Association Steering Committee, read a statement and used graphics to depict the Morningside area responses to the comment cards. She stated they do not support the North East Edina Transportation Study Residential Safety Improvements, and asked that all vertical measures be removed from the Traffic Safety improvements. Ms. Janovey outlined the improvements her group wished to have maintained; the sidewalks on the north side of 42nd from Oakdale to France and on Grimes from 42nd to Inglewood, the crosswalk on Sunnyside at Grimes, and the center island with mid-block crosswalk on W 44th at Kojetin Park. They requested that the following be added: sidewalk on France Avenue from 47th to Sunnyside and a stop sign at the crosswalk on Sunnyside at Traffic Safety Report Page 8 of 12 February 5, 2014 24 SEH EDINA NiPPIESOTA SEWER, WATECRWAIV4TORYSTWN ArRE?EANSTRUCION FE:413P-1/144. /PEA StFETY IPINOVEUE44r$ 54.44iii'51DC 120,0 Ai MUCe. An, 01.CEN AVE, I GIIS AVE 414E 44111A3503 C.f441W11: 14 „Itec, Grimes. They would like more police presence. Ms. Janovey said the steering committee supported the alternative proposal and pointed out they did not favor raised crosswalks. Member Housh moved that the Council accept the compromise plan presented by the Country representatives provided that i.) Sidewalks be installed across existing islands as recommended by the Northeast Edina Traffic Study, ii.) The final location of crosswalks be determined by the City Engineer based upon the conceptual locations shown in the compromise plan, and iii.) the proposed reduction in speed limits to 25 mph be deferred to a later date. Further, i.) all recommended vertical and horizontal realignments of streets in the northeast Edina study area outside of the Country Club district be deleted as planned improvements provided that ii.) Pedestrian-related improvements in this area be pursued at the appropriate time. Further, pedestrian-related improvements for the Morningside area be undertaken per the recommendations of the Morningside Neighborhood Association with the understanding that the stop signs proposed for the Grimes and Sunnyside intersection will be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for review and recommendation. The NE Edina Feasibility Study does not specifically state there will be a crosswalk at the intersection. In Appendix D — SHE Feasibility Study — Concept Example; a map shows crosswalks at the intersection of Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue, but it is stated on the map (subject to change during implementation and design process.) The Master Plan shows a traffic circle being installed at the intersection of Sunnyside Rd and Grimes Ave. A close up of the proposed improvements to the intersection is shown below. 101.-411. Picture: Safety improvements at Sunnyside and Grimes from 12-4-07 public hearing Traffic Safety Report Page 9 of 12 February 5, 2014 GOALS: • Reduce diversion of traffic through the neighborhood • Keep vehicle speeds In neighborhood at, or below, the posted speed limits • Enhance pedestrian/non-motorized travel and safety ASSUMPTIONS: • No physical prohibition of through movement • No verbal shilts on collector streets • City desires roadways to be no narrower than 26-feet Legend Combined Measure (Requires '2 30' street width) Speed Hump or speed Table Raised Crosswalk osa Center Island Narrowirg Choker (r) Realigned Intersection Traffic Clock al Raised Intersection • Sidewalk Connection Northeam Edina T Note: The final location and design of each measure is required RESIDENTIAL AREA SAFETY IMPROVEMENT MASTER PLAN Figure 10 NORTHEAST EDINA TRANSPORTATION STUDY REPORT Picture: Residential Area Safety Improvement Master Plan — Figure 10 Sunnyside and Grimes Traffic Safety Report Page 10 of 12 February 5_ 2014 Appendix Guidance for the installation of Local Traffic Control Signs City of Edina Local Traffic Control 1A. (MNMUTCD 2B.4) YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one of more of the following conditions exist; A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of- way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An un-signalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more the 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. 2A. (Edina Local Traffic Control Policy) Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. B. Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight hour period. C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: 1. More than five gaps — Pavement marking and signage only. 2. Four to five gaps — add activated pedestal mounted flasher 3. Less than three gaps — add activated overhead mounted flasher. D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization. E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks: 1. Routes to schools 2. Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities. 3. Locations adjacent to public parks. 4. Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street. 5. Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections. Traffic Safety Report Page 11 of 12 February 5, 2014 5A. (MNMUTCD 213.54) No Turn on Red signs If used, the NO TURN ON RED sign should be installed near the appropriate signal head. A NO TURN ON RED sign should be considered when an engineering study finds that one or more of the following conditions exists. A. Inadequate sight distance to vehicles approaching from the left (or right if applicable); B. Geometrics or operational characteristics of the intersection that might result in unexpected conflicts; C. An exclusive pedestrian phase; D. An unacceptable number of pedestrian conflicts with right-on-red maneuvers, especially involving children, older pedestrians, or persons with disabilities; and E. More than three right-turn-on red accidents reported in a 12-month period for the particular approach. F. The skew angle of the intersecting roadways creates difficulty for drivers to see traffic approaching from their left. Traffic Safety Report Page 12 of 12 February 5, 2014 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: February 20, 2014 Subject: Ordinance Discussion: Biking on Sidewalks Agenda Item #: VI. C. Action Discussion El Information El 121 Action Requested: Review, discuss and forward recommendations to City Council in the form of an advisory communication. Information / Background: At the August 16, 2012 ETC meeting a discussion was held regarding the status of the Edina ordinance prohibiting people from riding or parking a bicycle on a sidewalk in Edina. The month prior, the Bike Edina Task Force recommended changing the ordinance to allow bicycles on sidewalks (with noted exceptions). However, after discussion at the August 16 meeting (which included an Edina police officer) the ETC moved to table the issue for a later date. This issue was revisited at the next (September 20) ETC meeting, where the following motion was carried: 1. Forward the BETF memo and recommendation as background information. 2. Recommend that the City Council update Ordinance 1400.07, Subd. 3 by inserting the word "motor" before "vehicle" so that it reads: "No motor vehicle shall be parked or driven on or along a sidewalk." 3. Recommend that the City Council update Ordinance 1230.03G by inserting the word "motor" before vehicle so that it reads: "...no person shall in any park or publicly owned property: Drive or park a motor vehicle on any area not designated for parking or travel." 4. Recommend that the City Council eliminate Ordinance 1425 — Bicycle Registration. However, this issue was never forwarded on to City Council for consideration. The Draft Edina Active Routes to School (ARTS) Plan, which was presented to the ETC at its January 16, 2014 meeting, recommends changing the ordinance to allow people to ride on sidewalks in Edina. When this plan was presented to City Council at its February 3 meeting, several councilnnernbers expressed a desire to revisit this topic. —1-111VON.W. City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 For reference, the following is an excerpt from the Edina City Code: Edina Code of Ordinances Sec. 26-6. General rules for drivers. (a) Stop for school stop signs. Every driver of a vehicle shall stop at a sign marked "Stop, School" before entering an intersection. (b) Backing. No person in control of any vehicle shall back the vehicle without ample warning. While backing, care must be exercised not to injure persons or property. In no case, shall any vehicle be backed around a corner at or into an intersection of streets or highways. (c) Driving or parking on sidewalk. No vehicle shall be parked or driven on or along a sidewalk. (d) Quiet zones. On any street in the vicinity of any hospital or other institution in which sick or wounded persons are cared for or treated, where a sign is displayed containing the words "Hospital, Quiet," no person shall make or cause to be made by any person, or object under that person's control any unnecessary noise by fast driving, ringing of bells, blowing of horns, whistles or other devices, or instruments under that person's control, or in any other way, in such vicinity, so as to unreasonably disturb the peace, comfort or quiet of any patient of such hospital or institution. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 1400.07; Ord. No. 1401; Ord. No. 1401-A1, 5-1-1974; Ord. No. 1401-A2, 3-24- 1976; Ord. No. 1401-A3, 5-12-1976; Ord. No. 1401-A4, 11-24-1976; Ord. No. 1401-A5, 3-5-1980; Ord. No. 1401-A6, 8-5-1981; Ord. No. 1401-A7, 4-28-1982; Ord. No. 613, 5-16-1990; Ord. No. 2000-7, 7-5-2000; Ord. No. 2011-19, 12-6-2011; Ord. No. 2012-11, 5-1-2012) Attachments: Minnesota State Statute 169.222 Operation of a Bicycle Bike Edina Task Force Bike Ordinance Memo dated July 14, 2012 Meeting Minutes from August 16, 2012 ETC Meeting Meeting Minutes from September 20, 2012 ETC Meeting G:\ Engineering \ Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM\ Agendas & RR's\ 2014 R&R \20140205\ Item VI.C. Ordinance Discussion - Biking on Sidewalks.docx 1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 169.222 169.222 OPERATION OF BICYCLE. Subdivision 1. Traffic laws apply. Every person operating a bicycle shall have all of the rights and duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle by this chapter, except in respect to those provisions in this chapter relating expressly to bicycles and in respect to those provisions of this chapter which by their nature cannot reasonably be applied to bicycles. Subd. 2. Manner and number riding. No bicycle, including a tandem bicycle, cargo or utility bicycle, or trailer, shall be used to carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped, except an adult rider may carry a child in a seat designed for canying children that is securely attached to the bicycle. Subd. 3. Clinging to vehicle. Persons riding upon any bicycle, coaster, roller skates, toboggan, sled, skateboard, or toy vehicle shall not attach the same or themselves to any street car or vehicle upon a roadway. Subd. 4. Riding rules. (a) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway except under any of the following situations: (1) when overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction; (2) when preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway; (3) when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions, including fixed or moving objects, vehicles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or narrow width lanes, that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge; or (4) when operating on the shoulder of a roadway or in a bicycle lane. (b) If a bicycle is traveling on a shoulder of a roadway, the bicycle shall travel in the same direction as adjacent vehicular traffic. (c) Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway or shoulder shall not ride more than two abreast and shall not impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic and, on a laned roadway, shall ride within a single lane. (d) A person operating a bicycle upon a sidewalk, or across a roadway or shoulder on a crosswalk, shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal when necessary before overtaking and passing any pedestrian. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within a business district unless permitted by local authorities. Local authorities may prohibit the operation of bicycles on any sidewalk or crosswalk under their jurisdiction. (e) An individual operating a bicycle or other vehicle on a bikeway shall leave a safe distance when overtaking a bicycle or individual proceeding in the same direction on the bikeway, and shall maintain clearance until safely past the overtaken bicycle or individual. (0 A person lawfully operating a bicycle on a sidewalk, or across a roadway or shoulder on a crosswalk, shall have all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances. (g) A person may operate an electric-assisted bicycle on the shoulder of a roadway, on a bikeway, or on a bicycle trail if not otherwise prohibited under section 85.015, subdivision ld; 85.018, subdivision 2, paragraph (d); or 160.263, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), as applicable. Copyright © 2013 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 2 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 169.222 Subd. 5. Carrying articles. No person operating a bicycle shall carry any package, bundle, or article which prevents the driver from keeping at least one hand upon the handle bars or from properly operating the brakes of the bicycle. Subd. 6. Bicycle equipment. (a) No person shall operate a bicycle at nighttime unless the bicycle or its operator is equipped with (1) a lamp which emits a white light visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the front; and (2) a red reflector of a type approved by the Department of Public Safety which is visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of headlamps on a motor vehicle. A bicycle equipped with lamps that are visible from a distance of at least 500 feet from both the front and the rear is deemed to fully comply with this paragraph. (b) No person may operate a bicycle at any time when there is not sufficient light to render persons and vehicles on the highway clearly discernible at a distance of 500 feet ahead unless the bicycle or its operator is equipped with reflective surfaces that shall be visible during the hours of darkness from 600 feet when viewed in front of lawful lower beams of headlamps on a motor vehicle. The reflective surfaces shall include reflective materials on each side of each pedal to indicate their presence from the front or the rear and with a minimum of 20 square inches of reflective material on each side of the bicycle or its operator. Any bicycle equipped with side reflectors as required by regulations for new bicycles prescribed by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission shall be considered to meet the requirements for side reflectorization contained in this subdivision. (c) A bicycle may be equipped with a front lamp that emits a white flashing signal, or a rear lamp that emits a red flashing signal, or both. (d) A bicycle may be equipped with tires having studs, spikes, or other protuberances designed to increase traction. (e) No person shall operate a bicycle unless it is equipped with a rear brake or front and rear brakes which will enable the operator to make a braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement. A bicycle equipped with a direct or fixed gear that can make the rear wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement shall be deemed to fully comply with this paragraph. (f) A bicycle may be equipped with a horn or bell designed to alert motor vehicles, other bicycles, and pedestrians of the bicycle's presence. (g) No person shall operate upon a highway any two-wheeled bicycle equipped with handlebars so raised that the operator must elevate the hands above the level of the shoulders in order to grasp the normal steering grip area. (h) No person shall operate upon a highway any bicycle which is of such a size as to prevent the operator from stopping the bicycle, supporting it with at least one foot on the highway surface and restarting in a safe manner. Subd. 6a. Operator age. No person under the age of 15 shall operate an electric-assisted bicycle. Subd. 7. Sale with reflectors and other equipment. (a) No person shall sell or offer for sale any new bicycle unless it is equipped with reflectors and other equipment as required by subdivision 6, paragraphs (b) and (e) and by applicable regulations for new bicycles prescribed by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. Copyright © 2013 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 3 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 169.222 (b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a new bicycle may be sold or offered for sale without pedals if the bicycle otherwise meets the requirements of paragraph (a). Subd. 8. Turning, lane change. An arm signal to turn right or left shall be given continuously during the last 100 feet traveled by the bicycle before turning, unless the arm is needed to control the bicycle, and shall be given while the bicycle is stopped waiting to turn. Subd. 9. Bicycle parking. (a) A person may park a bicycle on a sidewalk unless prohibited or restricted by local authorities. A bicycle parked on a sidewalk shall not impede the normal and reasonable movement of pedestrian or other traffic. (b) A bicycle may be parked on a roadway at any location where parking is allowed if it is parked in such a manner that it does not obstruct the movement of a legally parked motor vehicle. Subd. 10. Bicycle events. (a) Bicycle events, parades, contests, or racing on a highway shall not be unlawful when approved by state or local authorities having jurisdiction over that highway. Approval shall be granted only under conditions which assure reasonable safety for all participants, spectators and other highway users, and which prevent unreasonable interference with traffic flow which would seriously inconvenience other highway users. (b) By agreement with the approving authority, participants in an approved bicycle highway event may be exempted from compliance with any traffic laws otherwise applicable thereto, provided that traffic control is adequate to assure the safety of all highway users. Subd. 11. Peace officer operating bicycle. The provisions of this section governing operation of bicycles do not apply to bicycles operated by peace officers while performing their duties. History: 1978 c 739 s 12; 1986 c 444; 1987 c 255 s 14; 1993 c 326 art 4 s 2; art 78 2; 1995 c 72 s 2; 2012 c 287 art 3 s 29-31; art 4 s 20; 2013 c 127 s 31-34 Copyright 0 2013 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. EDINA BIKE ORDINANCE MEMO SITUATION Edina ordinance 1400.07, Subd. 3 prohibits people from riding or parking a bicycle on a sidewalk in Edina. Edina ordinance Section 1425 requires registration of bicycles. BACKGROUND Bicycles on sidewalks—Local ordinance Edina ordinance 1400.07, Subd. 3 reads: "No vehicle shall be parked or driven on or along a sidewalk" A bicycle is a vehicle according to MN statute. Local ordinance therefore prohibits people from riding or parking a bicycle on a sidewalk. City code defines a sidewalk as "An improved thoroughfare located in the public right-of-way or public easement limfted to usage by pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles." Park pathways are shown in the Comprehensive Plan in Figure 7.1 I Bicycle Facilities, Some park pathways, such as those at Bredesen and most of the Promenade, have separate bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Other park pathways, such as those around Rosland Park, Centennial Lakes, and parts of the Promenade, are shared by bicycles and pedestrians. Sections of some park pathways open to bicyclists appear to be in the right-of-way, and therefore fall into the definition of sidewalk. The bituminous path along Highway 100 west frontage road is classified as a sidewalk, although it has the appearance to many of a side path or park pathway. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan does not discuss bicycling on sidewalks directly, but notes: "Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages, decrease the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. An effective municipal sidewalk system provides network continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users and uses, without notable gaps" (p. 33-34). Bicycles on sidewalks—State statute and surrounding communities State statute allows people to ride or park their bike on a sidewalk, except in business districts, unless prohibited by local authorities. Edina ordinance prohibits riding or parking a bike on a sidewalk. All surrounding communities appear to allow people to ride or park on the sidewalk, with some restrictions. State statute does not allow people to ride their bikes on sidewalks in business districts, unless permitted by local authorities. Edina does not permit riding on sidewalks in business districts. Bicycle registration Edina ordinance section 1425 requires bicycles in Edina to be registered. The ordinance references a state statute that has been repealed. There appears to be no process for registering bicycles in Edina. 7/14/12 1 ANALYSIS Bicycles on sidewalks generally The dangers of riding a bicycle on a sidewalk are well documented. These dangers are largely related -to cyclist behavior—for example, riding too fast, not yielding to pedestrians, and not pausing and looking before crossing a driveway or entering a street. Because the dangers are related to behavior, they can be influenced through education. Police departments are a highly trusted source for information about bicycling and traffic safety. People of all ages and apparent skill levels are observed riding on sidewalks in Edina. Edina Police, however, are limited in their ability to educate the public about how to ride on the sidewalk safely because sidewalk riding is prohibited by code. As cycling increases in Edina, there is an immediate need to educate the public about safe riding behaviors, including common situations where pedestrians and cyclists mix. Cyclists, pedestrians and motorists share the same space on most streets in Edina. Cyclists and pedestrians share the same space on some park pathways. Although it is not allowed, cyclists and pedestrians currently share the same space on public sidewalks. It is assumed the prohibition against riding on sidewalks is not widely known nor widely enforced. This raises a few questions. First, if this ordinance were widely known, would it have public support? Second, in the most common situations, would this ordinance be reasonable to enforce? For example, would it be reasonable to stop or cite a child for riding on the sidewalk in front of her house or a student riding on the sidewalk on his way to school? An ordinance that would be unreasonable to enforce in the most common situations deserves a second look. The reasons to allow sidewalk riding are summed up in an October 2011 Los Angeles Department of Transportation memo. LA looked at whether the city should ban bicycles from sidewalks and concluded that banning bicycles from using sidewalks "is a poor option to revising and enforcing a new ordinance." Their reasons to allow bicycles to use sidewalks apply to Edina as well. The memo includes suggested ordinance requirements that not only provide a basis for public education but also promote safe sidewalk riding behaviors. These requirements are: • Must provide the right of way to all pedestrians and slow to a walking pace of not more than 3 miles per hour; • Provide an audible signal—vocal or mechanical—to pedestrians to alert them to their presence; • Slow to a walking pace at driveways; and • Slow to a walking pace when entering an intersection; • Reestablish provisions for banning bicycles from sidewalks in business districts or heavily congested pedestrian corridors. Ordinance options City code section 1400.07, subdivision 3, can be modified by inserting the word "motor" so that the ordinance reads: "No motor vehicle shall be parked or driven on or along a sidewalk." This would allow bicycles to operate and park on the sidewalk as they are doing now. 7/14/12 2 Additional language can be added to the code to provide a basis for public education and promote safe sidewalk riding behaviors. This additional language is suggested below. Bicycles on sidewalks in business districts MN statute 169.222, Subd. 4 (d) prohibits riding a bike on a sidewalk in a business district unless permitted by local authorities. A business district is defined as: "the territory contiguous to and including a highway when 50 percent or more of the frontage thereon for a distance of 300 feet or more is occupied by buildings in use for business" (169.01 I, Subd. I 3). Business districts in Edina include neighborhood commercial nodes at 44th & France, Wooddale and Valley View, Grandview, and Cahill; 50th & France; industrial areas such as along Metro Boulevard; and the Southdale area. The reasons for allowing a person to ride a bicycle on a sidewalk apply in business districts as well. That said, there are also reasons for restrictions. Madison, WI allows bicycling on sidewalks except where buildings abut the sidewalk (http://www.cityofmadison.com/BikeMadison/getBiking/sidewalks.cfm). Edina could permit riding a bicycle on a sidewalk in business districts, except where a building is not set back from the sidewalk. This would prohibit riding a bicycle on a sidewalk at 50th & France, where there is a lot of pedestrian activity, but permit riding a bicycle on the sidewalk in business districts with very little pedestrian activity. Edina ordinance could also restrict sidewalk riding where posted. Bicycle registration Edina's bicycle registration ordinance references a state statute that has been repealed. There appears to be no process for registering a bicycle in Edina and the requirement to register a bicycle appears not to be enforced. Sidewalk riding permitted, not promoted There are important differences between permitting sidewalk riding and promoting it. While it is reasonable to ride on the sidewalk in some situations, the preferred place for bicycles is on the road. The City should continue to develop the on-road network of dedicated bicycle facilities. Public education should continue to emphasize that, as vehicles, bicycles have the right to use the road. The product of public education and facilities designed to encourage on-road cycling is a wider range of cyclists who perceive our roads as safe and fewer cyclists who feel the need to ride on the sidewalk. Those who continue to use the sidewalk will benefit from education on how to do it safely. The basis for this education can be provided in a revised bicycle ordinance. 7/14/12 3 RECOMMENDATION The BETE recommends that the City update City code to permit the operation and parking of bicycles on all City sidewalks, including in business districts, subject to certain restrictions. A person may operate a bicycle on a public sidewalk, including in a business district, subject to the following restrictions: • Yield to pedestrians (ss 169.222, subd. 4) • Give audible signal to pedestrians before passing (ss 169,222, subd. 4) • Slow to walking pace when pedestrians are present • Slow to walking pace upon approach to and when crossing a driveway or intersection; enter driveway or intersection only when clear of traffic • No riding on sidewalks in locations where buildings abut the sidewalk • No riding on sidewalks where posted • Bicycle parking must not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle travel (ss 169,222, subd, 9) • No bicycle parking where posted (ss 169.222, subd. 9) The BETF recommends that the City repeal City code Section 1425 — Registration of Bicycles, References Edina ordinance 1400.07 General Rules for Drivers. Subd. 3: Driving or Parking on Sidewalk, No vehicle shall be parked or driven on or along a sidewalk Edina ordinance Section 1425 — Registration of Bicycles 1425.01 Adoption of State Law. There is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference, as a provision of this Code, the provisions of M.S. Chapter I 68C relating to bicycle registration, except as such provisions may be made more restrictive by this Section. 1425.02 Bicycle Registration Required, All bicycles used or ridden upon any highway, street, alley, sidewalk or other public property within the City shall be registered in the same manner and subject to the same regulations, fees and penalties as those voluntarily registered pursuant to M.S. Chapter I 68C. 1425.03 Existing Permanent Licenses to Remain Valid, All existing permanent licenses granted by the City pursuant to former Ordinance No. 1421 of the City are valid as long as the licensed bicycles are in the possession of the original licensee. History: Ord 1423 adopted 8-13-80 Reference: M.S. Chapter I 68C 7/14/12 4 Statute 169.222 OPERATION OF A BICYCLE Subd, 4 (d) A person operating a bicycle upon a sidewalk, or across a roadway or shoulder on a crosswalk, shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal when necessary before overtaking and passing any pedestrian. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within a business district unless permitted by local authorities. Local authorities may prohibit the operation of bicycles on any sidewalk or crosswalk under their jurisdiction. Subd. 4 (f) A person lawfully operating a bicycle on a sidewalk, or across a roadway or shoulder on a crosswalk, shall have all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances. Subd. 9. Bicycle parking. (a) A person may park a bicycle on a sidewalk unless prohibited or restricted by local authorities. A bicycle parked on a sidewalk shall not impede the normal and reasonable movement of pedestrian or other traffic. Statute 169.21 PEDESTRIAN Subd. 1 Rights in absence of signal. (a) No pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield. Statute 169.011 DEFINITIONS Subd. 4. Bicycle, "Bicycle" means every device propelled solely by human power upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels except scooters and similar devices and including any device generally recognized as a bicycle though equipped with two front or rear wheels. Subd. 42. Motor vehicle. "Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self-propelled and every vehicle which is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires. Motor vehicle does not include an electric personal assistive mobility device or a vehicle moved solely by human power. Subd. 8 I .Street or highway. "Street or highway" means the entire width between boundary lines of any way or place when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter of right, for the purposes of vehicular traffic. Subd. 92. Vehicle. "Vehicle" means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, excepting devices used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. Surrounding Communities: Minneapolis: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/bicycles/faq/index.htm Bloomington: http://www.ci.bloomington.mn.us/code/index.php/o/page/p/695 Richfield: Section 1335.05, http://www.cityofrichfield,org/Residents/Codes/docs/ch I 3,pdf Hopkins: Section I 330, http://www.hopkinsmn.com/archives/pdf/code/section I 330- 7114/12 5 bicycles.pdf Eden Prairie: Section 7.20, subd, 2, http://edenprairie.org/modules/showdocumentaspx?documentid=82 St. Louis Park: No reference to sidewalk riding found in city code, but spoke with SLP Council member who said sidewalk riding is not encouraged, but it is permitted, Minnetonka: No reference to sidewalk riding found in city code; presumption is that it is allowed. City of Los Angeles Interdepartmental Memorandum, October 26, 201 I http://c1krepiacity.orgionlinedocs/2009/09-0680 RPT DOT 10-26-1 I .pdf ROUTING Drafted by Jennifer Janovy Distributed to BETF for July 12, 2012 meetings. Recommendation approved by BETF at July 12, 2012 meeting. 7/14/12 6 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM AUGUST 16, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Franzen, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was amended by member Janovy to move the BETF to after Community Comment to accommodate Sgt. Olson who was in attendance for the Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Iyer approving the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 19, 2012 Member Whited amended the minutes to add the following to the Streetcar Presentation to the 2 nd paragraph, 2 nd sentence, 'one stop parking option stands to help emphasize Southdale as a go to place; and this mode of operation is more friendly travel for seniors.' Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Janovy to approve the amended July 19 minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT Gretchen Cooper and Bill, 58th & Chowen, said their concern has gotten progressive over the last 7 years with the number of cars that are speeding between 57th & 58th and the increase in cut thru traffic during the school year. She said one month ago she yelled at a driver going about 40-45 mph and the driver turned around, came back and yelled explicits at her and said she was speeding because she was coming down the hill. Ms. Cooper said something needs to be done. She said she is aware that speed bumps are a problem for snow plows and she knows the police are monitoring the area but the problem increases on the weekends and holidays usually. She said the drivers are both teens and adults. Director Houle was asked if speed data was available and he said he would need to check. He said if the occurrences are at the same time every day the police can be notified for smart enforcement. A school bus was noted as a culprit that speeds through the same time every day. Mr. Houle said larger vehicles can often appear to be going faster than they really are. Member Whited said the issue is that the area is convenient for cut thru traffic and Mr. Houle said it is scheduled for reconstruction in a couple years and they can look at plans to address the issues. Member Janovy said this area has come up a few times and wondered if a slightly different approach should be taken. She said reviewing speed, volume, history of traffic safety requests and crashes is probably a good starting point but asking residents to wait a couple years might not be. Suggested solutions were putting out the speed monitor to educate drivers of how fast they are driving and adding it to the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) report in order to track it. Mr. Houle said staff will provide all the data at the next meeting and also add this to the TSC. Member lyer asked if staff tracks calls or issue areas and Mr. Houle said yes, they are tracked on a map. REPORT/RECOMMENDATIONS I ' , Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion V 4 Member Janovy said at the TLC Bike Blvd public hearing, someone asked about bikes, strollers and wheelchairs on I sidewalks and it was the first time she realized that bikes were not allowed. She brought the issue to the BETF and her report is from their discussion that recommends changing the ordinance to liberalize biking on sidewalk, allow biking on sidewalks in business districts and also allow parking on sidewalks. In conversation with the City of Minneapolis' bike ; coordinator, he told her that they allow biking on sidewalks but not in business districts but he knows it happens and they are studying the issue. Peter Kelley, chair of the BETF and member Janovy met recently with Sgt. Olson to discuss the issue. BETF liaison, Sgt. Tim Olson, was in attendance to explain the Police Department's opinion on biking on sidewalks which he said is based on safety. Sgt. Olson said allowing bikes on sidewalk would increase the safety risks at the expense of a small percentage of bikers. He said the City was aware of what they were doing when the ordinance was put together. He said further that the City is making an effort to provide bike lanes on the roads and that state statute has specific rules for biking on roadways. Sgt. Olson said he met with members Janovy and Kelley and they agreed there is a public safety issue by riding on the sidewalk. He said the department is reluctant to support open use of the sidewalk but recognizes exceptions and inconsistencies, e.g., a child learning to ride on the sidewalk and a parent riding with the child are not safety concerns because they would be riding slow; the upcoming France Avenue sidewalk project is not a concern because of the width of the sidewalk — it will not present a risk; and having parking stations on sidewalks. He said the ordinance could be modified to address these exceptions and inconsistences. Additionally, the ordinance references a bike registration law that was repealed by the state in 2005, so it is in effect adhering to an outdated law. \ Discussion Member Whited asked about bike collisions with seniors and Sgt. Olson said to date, there have not been any collisions on sidewalks. He said they do not actively enforce the sidewalk ordinance and in fact, most ordinances are enforced based on complaints but at least the ordinance is in place when enforcement is necessary. Member lyer asked if the ordinance should be used for high traffic areas like 66th & Valley View versus a residential street. Sgt. Olson said the biking population is so small, it does not warrant changing the ordinance. He said the focus should instead be on what is convenient for pedestrians, not for bikers. Member Bass said there are adults who do not like being in the streets and she sees both children and adults on sidewalks every day. She said some riders are comfortable in the streets while others are not. She said also that people do moderate their behavior accordingly and there have not been any crashes; however, they should allow for people who are making a safe choice based on comfort level and ability to do so legally. He said the ordinance is effective because there have not been any accidents and allowing for change has the potential for problems. He said the current system works well and there is no need to increase the risks to pedestrians based on a small population of bikers who already have a place to ride. Member LaForce said the ordinance is a good policy but he also thinks it is a problem when they have ordinances that do not reflect the practices of what is going on. He said most people are probably not aware that it is illegal to ride on sidewalks and he wondered what behavior change they would see if they were to tell people. Sgt. Olson said he believes most people would prefer to not have more bikers on the sidewalk. Member lyer said it does increase the risks if they add bikers to sidewalks. Sgt. Olson asked what is the need to put bikes on sidewalk when there is an adjacent roadway. He said the City is making strides to accommodate bikers with bike lanes like they have on 70th . He said integration of the different modes of transportation will create problems. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member lyer to table the current discussion and allow them to think over what was learned for discussion at a later date. All voted aye. Motion carried. En Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of August 1, 2012 Section A.1. Member Janovy did a revision of the speed table policy for discussion. She did not include a speed threshold because 27 mph, in context, could be considered unsafe so why wait for 30-35 mph to do something. Member Thompson ask to remove item #6 and allow for engineering judgment and member Janovy said she would prefer not to. Members lyer and Nelson agreed that item #6 should be removed. Member Franzen said the revision is concise and well written and agreed with deleting #6. Member Janovy agreed. Motion was made by member lyer and seconded by 2 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden, Franzen, lyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Sierks and Thompson. New student member Caroline Sierks was welcomed to the ETC. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The agenda was amended by member Bass to reschedule the do.town update for next month's meeting. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member lyer approving the amended agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 2012 The minutes was amended as follows: page 2, 4th paragraph, delete "Sgt. Olson said she supports the Police Department's position that it is a good ordinance regardless of whether it is legal to do so;" page 4, 3rd paragraph, delete "City Council" and replace with "State Legislature;" 4th paragraph, add "North" before "St. Paul." Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member LaForce to approve the amended August 16 minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None. REPORT/RECOMMENDATIONS do.town Update Rescheduled for next meeting. i Chair Nelson said the discussion was a continuation from last meeting. Member Janovy made the following motion and I it was seconded by member Laforce: 1. Forward the BETF memo and recommendation as background information. 2. Recommend that the City Council update Ordinance 1400.07, Subd. 3 by inserting the word "motor" before "vehicle" so that it reads: "No motor vehicle shall be parked or driven on or along a sidewalk." 3. Recommend that the City Council update Ordinance 1230.03G by inserting the word "motor" before vehicle so that it reads: "...no person shall in any park or publicly owned property: Drive or park a motor vehicle on any area not designated for parking or travel." 4. Recommend that the City Council eliminate Ordinance 1425 — Bicycle Registration, Member Janovy said for City Council's discussion, they would have the BETF memo and the ETC minutes for background and adding "motor" before "vehicle" is the simplest change because activities like skateboarding or inline skating would probably qualify as vehicles. She said it is more than bikes that are impacted by the code and this would change it to the Sidewalk Ordinance Discussion 1 intended purpose of restricting motor vehicles. She was asked about motorized scooters and wheelchairs and she said they are considered pedestrians if being used as a substitute for walking. Member lyer asked if they are going against the police's recommendation and member Janovy said yes. He said he agreed with eliminating the bike registration but wondered why they were going against the police. He said he would give discretion of enforcement in the same way that discretion is given to the engineering staff. Member Janovy said the police are not enforcing the ordinance and residents are confused about the ordinance based on ennails that the City Council has received. She said also that the change would bring Edina in line with surrounding communities. Chair Nelson also agreed with eliminating the bike registration and leaving everything else as is since there are no real issues. Member Janovy said parking bikes on sidewalk is currently not allowed and chair Nelson said this could be treated as an exception. Member Bass said they should support actual behavior and not dissidence. Members Thompson and Franzen also agreed with the motion. After discussion, the following vote was taken: Ayes: Bass, Braden, Franzen, Janovy, LaForce, Schweiger, Sierks, Thompson Nays: lyer, Nelson Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of September 5, 2012 Chair Nelson thanked staff for including photos in the report because they are very helpful in understanding the story. Section B.1. Member Janovy asked if the request was for no parking between Bruce & Casco Avenues. Director Houle said the request was specific to the resident's address. Member Janovy said the 85th percentile speed data is useful but asked if they could also get the number of vehicles travelling over 25 mph and Director Houle said yes. Member LaForce asked how to interpret the 85th percentile data. Director Houle explained that the industry standard is to look at the speed that 85% of drivers are travelling and member Thompson added that they look at all the recorded speeds and the 85 th percentile speed is the speed at which 85% of drivers are traveling at or under. He said the speed limit is set based on driver behavior and people drive based on their comfort level. Director Houle will explain how the 85th percentile speed process works at the next meeting. Section B.2. Member Thompson suggested a way finding sign to the back parking lot. Section D - Director Houle explained that section D is there to show other issues that staff assists residents with. Section D. 1. Member LaForce asked if the City proactively monitors overgrown vegetation and Director Houle said staff is encouraged to report clear view issues. He said the police enforce clear view and they are generally successful in getting residents to comply when complaints are received. Member Janovy noted that there is new landscaping at Concord & Oak with arborvitaes that are small now but will present a clear view issue when fully grown because of how close they are planted to the street. Director Houle said he will forward this to the police. Member Franzen said he received a letter from the City recently about trimming his trees. Section D. 12. It was noted that it would be informative to know what advisory was given to the resident. Section D. 13. It was noted that it was good to see the new crosswalk being noticed. Director Houle said the media has been calling him about the new style because of crosswalk incidences. Member Bass said she has noticed more kids using the sidewalk and crosswalk. Motion made by member Janovy and seconded by member Thompson to approve the September 5 TSC report. All voted aye. Motion carried. 2 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: February 20, 2014 Subject: City Council Joint Work Session Planning Action Requested: No action requested. Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action El Discussion MI Information CI Information / Background: On March 18 the ETC is scheduled to hold a joint work session with City Council. To prepare for that meeting, ETC members will discuss potential topics and an agenda at its regular February meeting. Both the 2013 and 2014 ETC Work Plans are attached for reference. Attachments: 2013 & 2014 Edina Transportation Commission Work Plan G:\ Engineering \ Infrastructure\ Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \ Agendas & RR's \ 2014 R&R \ 20140205\ Item VI.B. City Council Joint Work Session Planning.docx City of Edina 0 4801 W. 50th St. 0 Edina, MN 55424 EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2013 Annual Work Plan 2013 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Staff Support Required Council Date Required Approval Pedestrian / Sidewalk Plan July 2013 PACS Funding Yes —Transportation Planner! Engineer Progress Report: 013 New Initiative arget Completion Budget Staff Support Required Required PACS Funding Yes —Transportation Planner! Engineer Council Approval Way-finding Plan for pedestrians and bikeways December 2013 Progress Report: 2013 New Initiative Standard Signage for Roadways including bikeways — this will also be folded into the next steps of the Living Streets Policy - Target Completion Date NA :.udget e • uired Yes — but unknown Staff Support Required Council ' • •roval Yes — Engineering Staff Progress Report: 2013 New Initiative Target Completion Date May 2013 Budget Required No—funded through SHIP Staff Support Required Council Approval Yes — Engineering Staff Safe Routes to School Comprehensive Plan Progress Report: 2013 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Date aboush Required Staff Support Required Council Approval Review projects in the proposed Capital Improvement Program August 2013 Yes — Engineering Staff Progress Report: 2013 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Date Required Staff Support Required Council Approval Living Stree:s Policy & Plan August 2013 $150,000 Yes — Engineering Staff Progress Report: Ongoing Responsibil _ ...,_.6. itAlkie TLC Bike Boulevard Project Traffic Safety Reviews and Policy Updates France Avenue Intersections Improvement Project Transportation Options Bike Edina Task Force Other Work Plan Ideas Considered for Current Year or Future Years Grandview Area Transportation Plan (Implementation) Proposed Month for Joint Work Session: Staff Comments: 014 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Staff Support Required Council Date Re • uired As'royal Living Street Plan October 2014 $10,000 for graphics and mapping Yes Progress Report: 2014 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Date Required Staff Support Required Council Approval No Yes June 2014 Meet with Police Department and Public Works annually to discuss shared interests such as traffic education and enforcement, street maintenance as it affects cyclists and pedestrians, etc. Progress Report: A. royal 2014 New Initiative Target Completion Budget Dat Re uired Staff Support Required Council TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2014 Annual Work Plan Valley View Rd between Gleason Rd and Antrim Rd — work with School District and Active Routes to School working group to address traffic issues. June 2014 No — anticipate traffic collection being done in- house Yes Target Completion Budget Date Re_ uired Staff Support Required Council Approval Educational Safety Campaign May 2014 $10,000 potentially from SHIP Grant and remaining funds from PACS Fund Yes & also Communications Committee Progress Repor::: Ongoing Responsibilities . — Living Streets Policy: Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan — continue to look at opportunities for funding. Sidewalk Plan — finalize priority sidewalk plan Way-finding Signage for bikeways and pedestrians Education and Communication Ordinance Review for Policy PACS Program Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study — anticipated completion date of August 2014 Review transportation projects in the proposed Capital Improvement Program Review Public Works street mill and overlays and seal coat projects as to opportunities for remarking for bicycle facilities France Avenue Intersections Improvement Project Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Traffic Safety Reviews — Mapping system to access traffic safety complaints and resolutions, and traffic data Communications Committee Coordination with Bike Edina Task Force — Review Bicycle Friendly Community Application Grandview Area SW LRT Other Work Plan Ideas Considered for Current Year or Future Years L. (0) REPORT / RECOMMENDATION 18 BB To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: February 20, 2014 Agenda Item #: VI. A. Action 111 Discussion Information Subject: Active Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Education and Bicycle Parking Action Plan Action Requested: No action requested. Information / Background: The City of Bloomington Public Health contracted with the Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota (BikeMN) to provide analysis and feedback to make short-term changes and evaluate long-term strategies so that the communities of Bloomington, Richfield and Edina may become more bicycle friendly. This provided a foundation for BikeMN to identify community plan recommendations relevant in these cities in the active transportation areas of bicycle parking, policy and planning as well as Bicycle and Pedestrian Education. On October 23, 2013 BikeMN (along with the Minnesota Department of Health and MnDOT) hosted a Bikeable Community Workshop. Several City staff, elected officials and commission members attended the event, which included an interactive presentation of how the "5 Es of Bike Friendly Communities" (Evaluation, Engineering, Education, Enforcement and Encouragement) are used to improve bike-friendliness. In addition, a mobile workshop (a 5-mile bike ride through Edina) was conducted and an exercise was facilitated to get stakeholders to discuss ideas for an action plan. The Active Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Education and Bicycle Parking Action Plan is the culmination of these efforts. The plan — currently in draft stage — outlines action strategies, steps, responsible parties and timelines, with the goal of increasing the bicycle friendliness of the City. Nick Mason of BikeMN will give a presentation of the Plan and will answer questions and solicit feedback from the ETC. Attachments: Draft Active Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Education and Bicycle Parking Action Plan G:\ Engineering \ Infrastructure \ Streets \Traffic \TRANSP COMM \Agendas & RR's \2014 R&R \ 20140205 \ Item VIA. Edina Active Transportation Plan Presentation.docx City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 Prepared for: City of Edin January, 201 Active Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Education and Bicycle Parking Action Plan Acknowledgements: This plan to increase bike parking and improve bicycle and pedestrian education is the result of the hard work and engagement of many partners in the city of Edina: Katherine Bass, Ross Bintner, Eric Boettcher, Mary Brindle, Val Burke, Carrie Cabe, Susan Faus, Jordan Gilgenbach, Jennifer Janovy, Ann Kattreh, Kate Meredith, Chad Millner, Mark Nolan, Brian Olson, Josh Spague, Cary Teague, and Kay Zuccaro This plan was prepared by The Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota and is made possible through funding from the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) of the Minnesota Department of Health. For more information, visit http://www.health.state.mn.us/ship. Statewide Health Improvement Program ALT._N_R EF OR M 2 Background: City of Edina staff and citizens have taken a clear interest in moving forward with a new focus on active transportation. This momentum remains one of Edina's best assets. With the renewed energy and focus of the Bike Edina Task Force, new & engaged staff, and invested public officials much can be accomplished to shape the future accessibility, acceptance of and participation in bicycling and walking. However, stakeholders agreed collectively that one of the biggest barriers to bicycling in the city was a lack of cultural acceptance for bicycling and walking. Therefore, Edina needs to make policy, systems, and environmental changes that will make it easier and more accepted for people to be more active in their everyday lives. Through active living initiatives, active living and bik'e friendly .workshops, and input from stakeholders and community partners, two 4fpas have been..identified to focus on: increasing bicycle parking and bicycle and pedestrian sal* 'education. Stakeholders and community partners prioritized improvements iiiiithOf two areas to complement the on-street and trail improvements in City parks. To assist in identifying, the next steps in these two areas, Bloomington Public Health contracted with BikeMN to assist city and community stakeholders in developing a plan for theselth rovements in the City of Edina as a part of SHIP II. These improver-n9 n with feedback on Edina's Bicycle Friendly Community application from the League of. American.Bicyclists, which was received in 2010. Approach: BikeMN has undertaken a 42tte ;2( :proach in assis ing-in this process: 1. Conducted best IiractIce reseajThn. proven, efficient policies and programs for building bicycle parking infrastructure aJi implementing sustainable safety education stratedie:p.pring/ Summer'20§) .. ... 2. Initial stakeholder engagerri0t, including a meeting and individual outreach (Summer 2013) ........ %.:„... 3. Bikeable CO664„1,1ity Workshop was provided for city staff and other community stakeholders to further.e.xplortliese strategies (Fall 2013) 4. Final plan developed,g.o.'d on these discussions and presentation to community decision makers (Winteb: i3-14) Stakeholders provided individual and collective input on the direction of their community's strategies for success over the next two years through the kickoff meeting, comments, and the Bikeable Community Workshop held in the Fall of 2013. These recommended actions are based on models of best practices that have been researched and identified by stakeholders as efficient and effective investments to facilitate long-term improvements for bicycling and walking in Edina. 3 Action Strategy Descriptions Active Transportation Education In all stages of planning for more active transportation, cultural acceptance and education have been identified as key barriers. 1. Youth: In-School Education The City of Edina and Edina Public Schools are in final stages of developing a district-wide comprehensive Active Routes to School Plan, which includes recommendations for improving in-school bike and pedestrian education. This strategy involves encouraging the District to pilot the new .MnDOT Walk! Bike! Fun! Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Curriculurnin select schools for the intended audience of grades K-6. 2. Local Bicycle Safety Instructors Stakeholders have identified the need to e leadership for education within the community trainin Edina can begin to plan and execute regular annual educat activities around active transportation and recreation..,,These ins to craft and implement a regular annual education' of classes, events, and youth education that includes initiatives this pla more to be identified later. 3. Fund & Launch a Public Education Camp Dialogue with the larger community as en ea,* a need to improve an understanding of the right responsibilities road users as they use public right of way. Fostering acceptance and walking as a regular part ; of daily life in Edina a, desired out he City is currently developing tools for .„0NrIMUIll agement ca gn to increase Living Streets awareness through MUM& outreach strategies. Additional activities are identified here 61:complement e activities. - 4. Motorist Engage nizing that most idents own bikes also own cars and that those ho do not own bicycles,konly may get around in motor vehicles, educational outreach must target motorists and their understanding of how to safely drive around es. 5. Outreach: n Streets Event Stakeholdersstronglyidentified repeatedly cited issues of cultural acceptance of bicycling and walking as barriers to change, particularly with senior populations. Successful Opert0';'Streets Events across the state have drawn thousands of community participants of all ages to get out, get active and get to know their neighbors and support local business. pining system and ified irAtructors, outreach will help 4 Bike Parking 1. Provide Bike Parking at Established City Events Guiding residents to come to established city events such as the farmer's market must include a component that there is a safe, convenient place to park just as there is for residents who choose to drive to events. By publicizing available parking, providing incentives, and utilizing temporary bike parking racks, Edina can begin to establish regular opportunities for active transportation trips. 2. Parking inventory & Policy Goal for Increase Stakeholders and previous planning work has identified a lack of permanent bike or transportation trips throughout icyple arking, the city must ry and then establish talce imjbut Edina can work ity. Ike parkin e city has y begun ents with development arking irioises across the city as i s and ny ther communities. or rewire proof of parking for are' meet standards for estrian guidelines). Model parking as a major barrier to choosing bicycik Edina. To move forward on efforts to inceegt' benchmark its current bike parking with an accurate a goal and prioritize areas of increase It will towards much greater city-wide bike parking 3. Update city new and redevelopment codes Knowing that development is a constant ani some notable improvements in bike parking projects, further updates can provide j) has been done in Saint Louis Par The goals are: provide enough bik future needs and • make s:tkre functionality and safety (Assoc policies included in appen dix inn arking 10. desiOris on of Bigyble a 5 09 1 io II .7.3 oi otw /A..11,9111;zizliv:1 11(40.: A 1,r4;iiini(ii&J '1 rriiidliiw _ Active Routes To School education Show Walk! Bike! Fun! Curriculum to select elementary and middle schools Edina Public Schools (EPS), Edina Community Education (ECE) Feb-Apr. 2014 Send interested teachers/ support staff from selected schools to free spring training(s); consider engaging police department EPS, ECE Mar-April 2014 Teach curriculum first time in commumity ed classes at select schools EPS, ECE May-Oct 2014 Bike to Parks event ECE, Parks April-May 2014 Bike to School event: engage police staff EPS May-14 Include ARTS in Active Streets Implementation Plan Engineering staff Feb-Oct 14 Local bicycle safety instructors Community outreach to identify interested individuals Bike Edina, BikeMN Novi 3-March 14 Schedule Traffic Skills 101 class Bike Edina, Engineering staff, BikeMN mar-April '14 Send individuals to spring League Cycling Instructor Training Bike Edina, Engineering staff May-14 Draft community plan for education; Utilize existing summer education programming for youth and adults Bike Edina, instructors, ECE, Parks Summer '14 Certified instructors regularly to stay on track; implement initial plan Bike Edina, instructors, ECE, Parks Begin Summer '14 Fund & Launch a public education campaign: Includes bicyle operation, motor vehicle laws, and whys of active transportation Create Pocket Guide: biking around town (parks) Engineering staff, ETC Communications Committee, Communications staff Jan-May '14 Education on Sidewalk riding; Evaluate changing city ordinance with engagement of police Bike Edina, ETC Communications Committee, City council, Engineering, Communications staff Feb-July '14 Seasonal weekly or bi-monthly rides with elected officials Including the mayor to showcase existing facilities Bike Edina, City council, Parks May-Aug '14 Outreach: Open Streets Event Engage potential planning partners and experts: Richfield, Blue Cross/ Blue Shield; engage other city staff: Bill N., Arts & Culture committee, Park Board Bike Edina, Engineering staff, Parks Feb 14-July '15 Event Planning, approvals Bike Edina, Engineering staff, Parks, City Council June-Aug '15 Host Open Streets: potential on 50th street from Woodale to France Bike Edina, Engineering staff, Parks September '15 Bike Parking Parking Inventory & Policy Goal for increase: Priortize Schools Utilize intern(s) and or staff to catalogue racks Engineering staff April-June-'14 Label type, numbers of spaces, location into GIS, include final detail in public city map Engineering staff May-Sept '14 Priortize gaps and begin filling: schools first Engineering staff ' EPS start June '14 Establish Bike Parking Cost Share program Use plan tools to incorporate into capital budget; planning documents; engage with Bill N Engineering staff, city council Feb-Nov '14 Update city code(s) to maximize low-/no-cost bike parking while meeting best practice standards Review Action Plan tools Engineering staff, city council Feb '14 Modify for Edina specific needs; Include Proof of Parking detail for new and redevelopment; engaging Planning dept, ETC Engineering staff, city council Feb-Mar 14 Pass ordinance change Engineering staff ' city council Mar- June '14 Long Term Solutions: Upon reviewing best practice solutions, _btakehotders identified some strategies that would not be feasible within the next 1-kyears, but could be pit into effective work plans beyond that timeframe. Thew strategies can be reevaluated once short term strategies are in place. Appendixes and related MOO s: 1. Sma. tycling curriculum ovefV10. 2. WO:1k! Bike! Fun! dsiei:iirow 3. -Model.Bike Parking Policy 4. Mo e Parking Cost' hare Framework Additional Resources AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 3rd Ed.: https://bookstore.transportation.orq/item details.aspx?ID=104 Adventure Cycling Association: Largest bicycle organization in the world with more than 40,000 members whose mission is to inspire people of all ages to travel by bicycle. http://adventurecyclinq.orq/ Alliance for Biking & Walking: National organization that creates, strengthens and unites state/province and local bicycle and pedestrian advocacy organizations. http://www.peoplepoweredmovement.orq/ Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota: Bike friendly technical tsistance, acJv9icy and education http://www.bikemn orq Bike Month Planning Guide: Published by the League of ArnericanBicyclists used througqyt MN. http://www.bikeleaque.orq/programs/bikemonth/pdf/natioii— Ice month Bike Walk Twin Cities Count Report: Metrics and reports for c611WIN and using 8ta. http://www.bikewalktwincities.orq/news-events/bicvai .and-walkin`eKailitat-results Complete Streets Coalitions: Planning & passing locarT akes National CS Coalition: http://www.completestreekorq/ Minnesota CS Coalition: http://www.mncompletgfreets.ora League of American Bicyclists: Bicy.cle Friendly Codifiunity 1*(5:Woe page has a comprehensive list of resources across all of the Five http://www.bikeleaque.org/prograraiftyclefriendlyameritatatomftbities/Technical%20Assistance.php Minneapolis ,sit vjgory Coni p: See how the most active BAC in Minnesota works. http://070W.c ijEi Ø lis mn.us/b1 s/bac MnDOT.:Bikeways Facility Dsign Manual: I-it 'W.dot.state.mn.us/bike/designmanual.html National AItion of City Trai*Ortation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeways Design Manual: Provides cities with state-of-the-practice solutions that can help create complete streets that are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists. http://naMorg/cities-for-cyclinq/design-guide/ Open Streets ProjetN.tional gif bnization for Open Streets events planning. http://openstreetsproieN Safe Routes to School MI)Vesota: Now accepting grant requests (until Apr 27th) for planning assistance and implement4lion. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/ Safe Routes to School National Partnership: Advocate for safe walking and bicycling to and from schools, and in daily life, to improve the health and well-being of America's children and to foster the creation of livable, sustainable communities. http://www.saferoutespartnership.orq/ Share the Road Minnesota: Minnesota rules, crash data, and safety information. Order free materials for adults and kids. http://www.sharetheroadmn.orq 8 1 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 16, 2014 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was member Bass, Boettge, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, and Nelson. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Janovy to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 19, 2013 – Approved as corrected. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to approve the amended minutes of December 19, 2013. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT – None. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS MnDOT/Southwest LRT Freight Rail Presentation Southwest LRT Mr. Dave Christiansen presented an update on the Southwest LRT and 2014 Regional Rail. Mr. Christiansen said the Met Council was ready to vote on the co-location or relocation of the LRT when Governor Dayton requested a 90-day moratorium to re-examine freight rail alternatives/options in response to controversies that were still present. Several alternatives/options are under review and the consultants’ reports are due Jan. 31 and open houses will be scheduled. He said if it appears they are moving rapidly with this project this is because the design phase actually began in 1996 and the Met Council, who took over in 2012 from Hennepin County, would like to finalize design because other projects around the country are in similar state of readiness and they are competing for the same funds. The LRT is number one on the list for funding and the Met Council do not want lose their standing. He said most of the issues have been resolved except for the current ones with freight being the biggest. Mr. Christiansen said it is difficult to relocate freight trains because most lines have been abandoned while freight traffic has increased. He said TC&W is experiencing moderate growth while Canadian Pacific (CP) will see minor changes such as week day switches, occasional TC&W transfers and approximately 4-6 additional trains at nights on the Dan Patch line passing thru Edina. He said TC&W is evaluating the Savage Swing Bridge to put it back in service. Mr. Christiansen said the Kenilworth is a major service area for freight and the Met Council is moving forward with plans but the Minneapolis City Council said they were promised that freight rail would be taken out of the Kenilworth area; additionally, the bike path currently runs next to the railroad. One suggestion is a shallow tunnel for the LRT with the bike path on top and freight remains in same location. He said the conundrum that they are faced with is to spend more money and stay in Kenilworth or move into St. Louis Park. Passenger Rail Mr. Christiansen said they are working on plans for high speed rail but funding is not yet available. They are Minneapolis to Duluth and the plans should be completed by the end of this year; Rochester to the Twin Cities and 2 the plans should be completed within 18 months; and Chicago to the Twin Cities and plans should be completed by end of this year (this one requires the cooperation of Wisconsin and they pulled out two years ago). Another route is Mankato to Minneapolis but this one does not have local support (would run on the Dan Patch line). Quiet Zones Mr. Christiansen said there is a method and engineering formula that communities can use to create quiet zones and the railroad has to shut-off their horn; however, the quiet zone application does not include pedestrian safety. To include pedestrian safety at crossings, the cost is between $75,000 and $500,000 per crossing. Edina has about six crossings. The following questions were asked of Mr. Christiansen: • Are there guidelines for adding bike trail next to the CP rail? There are none at this time and the railroad gets nervous when you want to add anything next to them. He said to use common sense and they suggest a fence between the trail and railroad. • What do you get for $75,000 vs $500,000 when upgrading a crossing? There are many factors to consider – current ADT, number of lanes, signals, number of trains, etc. Also, an upgraded crossing may need to be re- engineered later on if circumstances change (traffic increases, etc.). • Does MNDOT have funding available to upgrade crossings? There is a small budget for crossings but Edina would not qualify because quiet zones are considered quality of life improvement and not safety related. • For the LRT, will Edina be required to provide municipal consent? No, because Edina will be affected on a secondary level. • Is the Southern Arm being considered? Not at this time but this could change. Active Routes to School Presentation Member Bass explained Edina’s Active Routes to School plan starting with the name. She said the nationwide program called Safe Routes to School began as an initiative to increase walking and biking to school but the plan covers more than just safety so they decided that Active Routes to School was a more appropriate name. She said the benefits of walking and biking includes healthier children, better academic performance and less traffic congestion. The plan goals include supporting walking and biking where it is safe to do so and making changes in unsafe areas. She emphasized that it does not include making everyone walk, bike, or eliminate school busses and cars but to make it possible and safe for those who want to walk or bike; especially the 16% of students within the district’s .7 mile walking zone. Continuing, member Bass said the plan was developed to serve as a vision for the community; identify and prioritize short and long-term improvements such as engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement and evaluation; and funding opportunities (MNDOT requires a plan when seeking funding). She said the plan was developed by consultant Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. by gathering data; site visits; stakeholders input from a working group that included City and District staff, members Bass and Janovy from the ETC, a City of Bloomington Public Health staff; principal interviews; Edina High Student Council; and a parent survey. There were 369 responses to the parent survey and the reasons most cited for not regularly walking or biking to school were traffic (amount and speed); infrastructure (intersection and crossing safety, presence of sidewalk/pathways), and distance (for high school); and 59% said a child had asked for permission to walk/bike in the last year. Member Bass said the plan’s recommendations were categorized by short, mid or long-term plans and implementation would be done by the City or District or jointly. 3 Finally, she said the plan would be presented to other committees for review and input and adoption by City Council and the School Board; establish a working group to help with implementation; and monitor funding sources. Discussion Member Iyer recommended a sidewalk on W. 66th St. west of TH-100 (on the steep hill); establish drop-off locations that students can walk from; create an efficient pedestrian connection from the Cornelia Neighborhood to South View and Concord which would include a pedestrian bridge over TH-62 that accommodates bikes (existing bridge is not bike friendly); consider higher fines when drivers park on street during the winter and snowplows are not able plow properly; and reduce the number of garbage trucks on the streets when students are walking. Member Boettge said she did not recall receiving a parent survey and asked how the survey was distributed. Member Bass could not recall all the avenues that were used but some included the District’s In The Know newsletter, Edina Patch and other means that individual principals used. Member Boettge asked if more surveys are planned and member Bass said not a parent survey but student surveys are included in the plan. Member Janovy asked if the ETC would like to make a recommendation to forward the report to the City Council for adoption. Member Iyer said he would like his suggestions addressed before forwarding the report to the City Council and he asked if there was an opportunity for more people to be involved. Member Bass said she would forward his suggestions to the consultant for inclusion and that he could participate in the working group. The consensus was to include member Iyer’s suggestions and bring the plan back next month for a final review. Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2014 Section A1. Another issue in this area said chair Nelson are the two left turn lanes under the TH-100 bridge – one turning north to TH-100 (north left turn lane) and the other presumably to the frontage road (south left turn lane). He asked if there could be better signage because if you’re in the south left turn lane trying to go onto TH-100 it is difficult and traffic often backs up to Rabun Drive because of the turn lanes. Transportation planner Nolan will look into this (member Janovy noted that this area has been looked at in the past). Section B1. Member Janovy asked for clarification on what the request was and transportation planner Nolan said it was for additional (unspecified) signage; however, the area is already signed and staff did not think advanced warning sign would be effective. Member Janovy said limiting parking near the crosswalks was raised in the past and she suggested checking to see how far back from a crosswalk parking is allowed and extending that even further back to allow for pedestrian visibility. Section C2. Transportation planner Nolan said Hennepin County has offered to install a rapid flashing beacon and an enhanced crosswalk in 2014 and he is checking to see if they would consider straightening out the crosswalk and adding a pedestrian refuge. In the appendix, member Janovy suggested identifying marked pedestrian crosswalk as City of Edina policy to make it clear what is controlled by the City. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to forward the January 2 Traffic Safety Report to City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members - None Bike Edina Task Force Member Janovy said the Bike Edina Task Force is now Bike Edina. She said they are accepting new members and the application is online at BikeEdina.org. Member Bass asked why Bike Edina did not conduct the Bike Rodeo this year 4 and if they may not be interested in the future. Member Janovy said it was only for this year because of reorganizing and liability concerns. Member Bass suggested partnering with other organizations for future rodeos. Living Streets Working Group Chair Nelson said they met on Jan. 2 and discussed network connections and design guidelines. Communications Committee Member Janovy asked if the communications plan for the France Avenue Intersection Enhancement project has been revisited now that the project has been approved. Transportation planner Nolan said he saw the plan for the first time today and he and interim city engineer Millner will be working on it. Member LaForce suggested sharing the final project plans with the ETC. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Janovy asked if there are any noise walls planned between crosstown and W. 50th Street. She said the chain link fences along the ramps at W. 50th Street and TH-100 aren’t in good shape and asked what the process was for replacing them. Transportation planner Nolan will check on these. Chair Nelson said the Park and Ride on the east side of Southdale is now opened with express services to downtown Minneapolis and to the University of Minnesota. Member Bass asked about the timeframe for filling the city engineer’s position. Transportation planner Nolan said they are down to two final candidates and they expect to fill the position by next month. STAFF COMMENTS • Transportation Options - transportation planner Nolan said he met with commissioner Whited to discuss the upcoming Transportation Options workshop and she suggested some things for the ETC to consider before the workshop next month. In response to her suggestions, chair Nelson suggested a formal or informal survey to see what transportation options are currently available. Member Bass said they could also look at data already available like the Quality of Life survey conducted by the City; member Janovy concurred and said the survey asked how people get around the community and it also captures their age. • France Avenue Intersection Enhancement Urban Design - a meeting is being planned to share design concepts; more information to come on the meeting date and time. • W. 54th Street – engineering services agreement was approved; staff is working on a variance for the advisory bike lane which will mostly like be approved; a neighborhood meeting is planned for 1/27 for bridge design feedback. • Xerxes Avenue – the County will mill and overlay from W. 54th to W. 66th in 2014. Member Janovy suggested looking at pedestrian crossings and transportation planner Nolan said the County has agreed to install a crosswalk at W. 64th. • Three Rivers District asked cities to submit proposals for the Transportation Alternative Program Solicitation and Edina was one of six from 27 proposals that were accepted. If funding is approved the money would be used to construct a path at Oaklawn and Parklawn Avenues (an Active Routes to School path). ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. 5 ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2014 NAME TERM J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2014 1 1 100% Boettge, Emily 2/1/2014 1 1 100% Iyer, Surya 2/1/2015 1 1 100% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2014 1 1 100% LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 100% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 0 0% Sierks, Caroline student 0 0% Van Dyke, Jackson student 0 0%