HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-11-20 Meeting Packet AGENDA
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMUNITY ROOM
November 20, 2014
6:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of October 23, 2014
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During “Community Comment,” the Transportation Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues
or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of
speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on
tonight’s agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair
or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Commission might refer the
matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Former Public Works Site at Grandview – Redevelopment Plan Update
B. Proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment
C. Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2014
D. Updates
i. Student Member
ii. Bike Edina Working Group
iii. Living Streets Working Group
iv. Walk Edina Working Group – Approval of members
v. Communications Committee
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission
November 20, 2014
Page 2
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way
of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in
advance of the meeting.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS
Thursday November 20 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday December 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday January 15 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thursday February 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday March 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday April 16 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thursday May 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday June 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM
G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\TRANSPORTATION DIV\Transportation Commission\Agendas & RR's\2014 Agendas\20141120 Agenda.docx
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Date: November 20, 2014
Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of November 5, 2014
Agenda Item #: VI. C.
Action
Discussion El
Information 11]
Action Requested:
Review and recommend Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) Report of Wednesday November 5, 2014, be
forwarded to City Council for approval.
Information / Background:
It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the meeting. An overview of the comments from
the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be included in the staff report provided to Council for
their December 16, 2014 meeting.
Attachments:
Traffic Safety Committee Report for November 5, 2014.
G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ TRANSPORTATION DIV \Traffic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summaries\ 14 TSAC & Min \ 11-05-14 Cover.docx
-74910 AM/
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Photo : Arcadia, looking south
Map : Queuing along Arcadia
Traffic Safety Committee Report
Wednesday, November 5th, 2014
The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on November 05. The City
Engineer, a Police Sergeant, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Planning
representative, and the Director of Public Works were in attendance for this meeting.
From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved
have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed
that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included
on the November 20 Edina Transportation Commission and the December 16 City Council agenda.
Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action
Al. Request for mitigation of drive-thru queue
on Arcadia, from Starbucks
The requestor states that the Starbucks' drive-
thru queue consistently is long enough for cars to
be stopped on city streets, both Arcadia and Gus
Young Lane. The requestor feels that this is an
issue because the road is not wide enough for
queued cars to be passed on their side of the
centerline, and this leads to drivers crossing a
double yellow line, violating expectations from
drivers. In site visits queues were present in both
directions, with both left-turning (northbound)
and right-turning (southbound) queues
appearing on their respective right hand sides of
the roadway. In discussions with property
management and Starbucks management, it was
made clear that they were aware of the issue and
had exhausted all their possibilities in dealing
with the situation. Arcadia has 1186 AADT just
north of this location, and Gus Young Lane has 4275 AADT in this location, with
20 and 22 mph respectively. Arcadia in this location is 29.5 feet wide.
85th-percentile speeds of
After review, staff recommends increased police enforcement and ticketing any driver who is illegally
passing.
11Page
Photo : Edina Industrial Boulevard, looking east
Map : Edina Industrial Boulevard 2 lane segment
Map :60th and Wooddale
A2. Request for reduction in speeds and clarity
on where lanes are present on Edina Industrial
Boulevard
This request was reopened by a business owner
at Metro Boulevard and Edina Industrial
Boulevard. The requestor states that high speeds
are common along Edina Industrial Boulevard
from 78th Street to Metro Boulevard, with many
people using the street as if it were four-lanes
wide instead of two. This request had previously
been considered a D item due to possible
resurfacing and restriping the road at that time.
The resurfacing is no longer planned. A radar
study was performed on Edina Industrial Blvd
and it was found that the 85th-percentile speed
was 38 mph eastbound, with top speeds
exceeding 50 mph. The road is 42.5 feet wide in
this location, with no parking on either side
having 21 foot wide driving lanes in each direction. This
bicycling route.
segment is designated to be a future primary
After review, staff recommends striping shoulder lanes ("fog lines") in each direction on Edina
Industrial Boulevard in order to delineate where the road narrows to one lane in each direction. This
work is anticipated to be completed in the spring of 2015.
A3. Request for a reduction in traffic speeds on
Wooddale at 60th Street
The requestor originally asked for a stop sign to
control speeds on Wooddale. When the
requestor was informed that such a request
would not be approved due to city policy the
request was altered to be for a speed study on
Wooddale and to see if any traffic calming
measures could be done. Weekday 85th
percentilespeed was 33.8 mph; weekend 85th
percentilespeeds exceeded 35 mph. Wooddale
is a dedicated bike route with sharrows.
Wooddale has a weekday volume of 3570 AADT,
sidewalk on one side, and a width of 32 feet.
After review staff recommends enforcement in
this location.
Photo : Wooddale at 60', looking north
2 'Page
Map : Cornelia School
Section B : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends denial.
131. Request for a "Curve Ahead" sign on Lincoln Drive
This request concerns a slight curve on Lincoln
Drive. The requestor feels that the corner is not
apparent and should have a warning sign to
prevent drivers from driving off the road,
particularly at night. The curve is very slight, and
has a design speed of 43 mph according to
AASHTO (American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials) guidelines. Other
curves in this area have warning signs, however
they are much sharper curves. Lincoln Drive has
2733 AADT and an 85th-percentile speed of 38.3
mph north of the curve. Map : The Lincoln drive curve in question
After review staff recommends denial of this request. This decision was based on the speed limit at
this location, and design speed of the curve.
B2. Request for clarification for "When Children
Are Present," placards around Cornelia School,
and enforcement of speed limits
This request concerns drivers who may be driving
unsafely around Cornelia School due to confusion
with the reduced speed limits when "Children
Are Present". An Edina Police Sergeant has
explained when children are present as "... if
children are arriving or leaving school during
opening or closing hours, or during recess
periods, then children are considered presenel.
Recent counts in the area suggest that the speed
limit without these restrictions is being obeyed,
with 85th-percentile speeds below 30 mph on
weekdays; however speeds at specific times and
the presence of children were unavailable data
points.
After review, staff recommends not placing
additional signage at this location. However,
clarification of "When Children Are Present"
was communicated with the requestor and
police will continue to monitor the area.
Photo : Siqn on Cornelia
1 Harlow, Tim. Star Tribune, "The Drive: If children present, rules on speed zones rule". April 7th, 2014. Accessed
online at http://www.startribune.com/loca1/254114111.html, October 31st.
3IPage
Map : Traffic Control in the area
B3. Request for signs to direct parking from Gleason Court to the Bredesen Park parking lot
The requestor states that it is common for the
entryway to Gleason Court to be filled with
parked cars, and that these cars are not visitors
to neighbors but are using the cul-de-sac as an
alternative to the parking lot for Bredesen Park.
The requestor also noted that he did not believe
parking in the cul-de-sac overall to be an issue
and did not wish to restrict parking near the
entry for residents or guests. In site visits, few
vehicles have been seen parked along this area,
and none were close enough to influence turning
into the cul-de-sac from Gleason Road. Gleason
Court is about thirty feet wide along its entire
length.
After review, staff recommends denial of this
request. This decision was based on the width of
the roadway in this location, and to avoid sign
clutter. The requestor was further informed that
he may report anyone parked within thirty feet
of the intersection.
B4. Request for stop sign on Alden at Morningside
Photo : Vehicle parked near entryway
Map : Entrance to Gleason Ct. off Gleason Rd.
This request comes from a resident on Morningside, who believes that drivers speed down Alden and
turn onto Morningside at high speed. This makes it difficult for the requestor to back out of the
driveway of the residence the requestor occupies. The request for a stop sign was seen as a solution to
allow for larger gaps for leaving the driveway. Other solutions were also proposed, and were seen as
able to help the scenario, such as bringing the trash cans further into the driveway. A preconstruction
count along Alden showed an AADT of 257 and an 85th-percentile speed of 22.3 mph. There are no
reported accidents in this location. Warrants for stop
signs are attached in appendix A.
After review, staff recommends denial of this request.
This decision was due to not meeting warrants for a
stop sign.
Photo : Alden at Morningside, looking north
4 1Page
Map : Tracy and Brook
-
Photo : Tracy at Brook, lookina north
B5. Request for prohibition on using driveways as U-Turns in the city, discourage use of a specific
driveway
The requestor states that many people turn around in her driveway, which is the 3"d off of a major
roadway on a side street. In the request it was stated that many people pull their entire vehicles into the
driveway, just to back out into a three-point turn. Requestor further asked if placing a cone or trash bin
in the center of her driveway would be acceptable to the city, and called back to report people had been
getting out of their cars and moving the obstruction to turn around in the driveway. The requestor was
also curious as to any other steps that may be taken to reduce the amount of U-Turns in the driveway.
After review, staff recommends denial of this request. When she asked, the requestor was informed
that it is not illegal for her to continue to obstruct her driveway.
B6. Request for lowering the speed limit and for
traffic calming on Tracy Avenue, at Brook Dr.
The requestor states that cars often drive very
quickly down this street, and the requestor is
concerned about the children boarding buses for
school. A 2013 count found that the 85th
percentilespeed in this location along Tracy was
30.7 mph, with a volume of 1667 AADT. There is
no sidewalk along Tracy in this location; however
it is on the proposed Sidewalk Facilities Map.
Tracy Ave. is 30 feet wide.
After review, staff recommends denial of this
request. This decision was based primarily on
speeds only slightly over the speed limit.
SI Page
Map. 78th Street, between Cecelia and Cahill
Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends more study
Cl. Request for a "No Right Turn on Red" restriction on Cecelia Circle/ Delaney Boulevard at 78th
Street
This request comes from a property owner on
78th Street, who says tenants in the building
have trouble turning out of the driveway due to
Cecelia traffic turning right on red, removing
gaps. A gap study was performed, and during
evening rush hour left turns would have been
restricted such that acceptable gaps would not
be present for 5 minutes. However, this lack of
gaps was not due to right on red, but instead
due to the queue from the light at 78th and
Cahill blocking the property's driveway. When
vehicles were exiting the driveway, vehicles in
the queue were courteous and allowed exiting
vehicles to turn.
After review, staff recommends further study
of this location. This will include a study of the
intersection of Cahill Road and 78th Street, as
well as a further counts of right turns from
Cecelia Circle.
Photo : 78th Street, looking east from Cecelia
6 1Page
D Items : Other Traffic Safety Issues Handled
DI_ Business along Lincoln Drive requested advice on better strategies for public safety to find and
access their building. The Traffic Safety Coordinator and Fire Marshal reviewed the current signage and
found that it was compliant with regulations. A monument was suggested as a possibility to increase
visibility.
D2. Resident noted that during repaving, in pavement lights along the Promenade at Hazelton were
partially obstructed or paved over. Pictures were taken of the issue, and were sent to the Streets
Supervisor for cleaning.
D3. Further study of Valley View Road speeds, east of Tracy was requested. The study found that the
mitigation installed earlier in the year was having little effect on speeds, with the 85th-percentile speeds
of 38 mph. Police already patrol heavily in this area, and the "Your speed is..." trailer was placed at this
location.
D4. This request was for trimming of neighbor's trees and plantings along Parkwood Road that have
grown into the street and obstruct the view from the driveway. The request was forwarded to the city
forester.
D5. A request was received to investigate the light timing of Valley view Road and 66th Street.
Electricians informed the Traffic Safety Coordinator that the light was running on a fixed cycle as the
new actuation technology was installed. The light is now back to actuated timings.
D6. A request was received for adding a signal to York at Parklawn Avenue to facilitate left turns. This
request was forwarded to Hennepin County who controls signals along York, and they are investigating.
We have a traffic study that details when.
7 1Page
Appendix A
Stop Sign Warrants,
Edina City Policy
1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be
followed.
2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when
considering the installation of a stop sign.
3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a stop sign, a residential
intersection should be left uncontrolled.
4. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period,
stop signs should be considered.
5. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of
the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign.
6. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the
posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street.
7. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs
should be considered.
8. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed.
9. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume.
State Warrants
Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection
control. The following factors should be considered:
A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
B. Number and angle of approaches;
C. Approach speeds;
D. Sight distance available on each approach; and
E. Reported crash experience.
YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if
one or more of the following conditions exist:
A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-
of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law;
B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets
or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the
following conditions exist:
A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all
approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
8 1Page
B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop
or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary;
and/or
C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way
at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year
period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period.
YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control.
At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to
using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9).
The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment
indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions:
A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day;
B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe
conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or
C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the
installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more
such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such 'crashes include right-angle
collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to
traffic on the through street or highway.
Wage
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Date: November 20, 2014
Subject: Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Agenda Item #: VI. B.
Action 111
Discussion
Information
Action Requested:
Provide City Council with input and feedback regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
in the form of an ETC Advisory Communication.
Information / Background:
Please recall that at their September 18 meeting, the ETC recommended that the draft Sidewalk Facilities
Map be considered for amendment into the Comprehensive Plan. At an October 22 public hearing, the
Planning Commission unanimously approved the proposed amendment, and forwarded it on to City Council
for their approval.
At the November 3 City Council meeting, staff presented the Sidewalk Facilities Map and proposed language
to Council. A public hearing was held where over twenty residents testified regarding the Sidewalk Facilities
Map. Prior to the presentation and public hearing, Council voted to postpone the vote on the proposed
amendment until their December 2 meeting. A link to the video of the November 3 meeting can be found
here: http://edina.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view id=7&clip_id=2026 (Item VI.B. starts at approximately
the 36-minute mark).
Council also asked staff to hold four public meetings — one for each quadrant of the City — to obtain
additional public input regarding the proposed amendment prior to the Council vote on December 2. Those
meetings will be/were held on November 17 (northwest and southwest Edina) and November 19 (northeast
and southeast Edina). Staff will give an update regarding these meetings to the ETC at their November 20
meeting.
Commissioners are asked to provide additional input regarding the map, proposed amendment and process
for the Council to consider at its December 2 meeting. Council has suggested that the ETC prepare an
advisory communication to do so.
City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. < Edina, MN 55424
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
Page 2
Attachments:
Sidewalk Facilities Map Staff Report and Attachments from November 3, 2014 City Council Meeting
G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Transportation Commission \ Agendas & RR's \2014 R&R \ 20141120 \ Item VI.B. Sidewalk Facilities Map Comp Plan
Amendment.docx
, (( ).)11,),,):. I
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #: VI. B.
From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Action 1E1
Discussion
Date: November 3, 2014
information D
Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
Resolution No. 2014-137
Action Requested:
Adopt Resolution No. 2014-137, approving the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the
following:
Revise and replace the Pedestrian Facilities section of the Transportation Chapter (Chapter 7) of
the Comprehensive Plan and Figure 7-10 Sidewalk Facilities.
Information / Background:
As part of the overall Living Streets Plan, staff has been preparing a new Sidewalk Facilities Map based in part
on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets policy and input from City staff, officials and
residents. At the Jul. I Work Session, City Council expressed a desire to approve an updated Sidewalk
Facilities Map prior to the approval of the overall Living Streets Plan (anticipated for early of 2015). City
Council also directed staff to bring the Sidewalk Facilities Map forward for amendment into the
Comprehensive Plan, so that an approved sidewalk network can be considered during the planning and
design of current and future roadway reconstruction projects. On Oct. 22, a public hearing was held with
the Planning Commission regarding amending the Sidewalk Facilities Map to the Comprehensive Plan. At
that meeting testimony was heard and the Commission voted to approve the Comprehensive Planning
Amendment and send it to City Council for consideration.
The following is the timeline for approvals and amendment to the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan:
0 Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for- public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) Oct. 3
0 Informational packet received by City Council Oct. 7
0 Planning Commission Public Hearing and Approval of Amendment Oct. 22
0 Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) Oct. 27
0 City Council Public Hearing and approval of Comprehensive Plan amendment Nov. 3
The Sidewalk Facilities Map shows the streets that currently have sidewalks and streets where sidewalks are
planned over the next 20-30 years. It should be noted that the map does not indicate on which side of the
street future sidewalks are to be installed. This decision will be based on input from more thorough
engineering studies and stakeholders prior to design and installation. Additionally, if a sidewalk is not
indicated on a particular street, this does not preclude that street from being considered for a sidewalk in
City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
Page 2
the future as its context criteria (e.g. traffic counts, speeds, redevelopment, etc.) may change over time, and
residents are free to petition for a sidewalk as well.
The Sidewalk Facilities Map reflects thoughtful and considerable construction of criteria, is data-driven (see
attached matrix), and most importantly is consistent with the Living Streets Policy vision and value of
supporting the transportation needs of all Edina's residents.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Pedestrian Facilities
Attached is the Sidewalk Facilities Map, which will replace Figure 7.10 in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and
below is content that is recommended to replace the "Pedestrian Facilities" section of that Plan (Chapter 7,
pages 7-33 to 7-36: "Pedestrian and Bike Facilities").
Pedestrian Facilities
The goal of this section is to build upon the current City practices to create a framework for planning and
implementation of future sidewalks. Sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities are an important component of
the City's transportation infrastructure.
Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages and abilities, decrease the dependency
on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. 'An effective municipal sidewalk system provides network
continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users and uses, without notable gaps.
Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent land uses.
Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide opportunities for active
living and access to destinations and critical connections between multiple modes of travel, as users of
motor vehicles, transit and bicycles all must walk at some time during their trip.
Refer to the Sidewalk Facilities Map (Figure 7.10) for locations of existing and proposed future sidewalks.
Sidewalks are required:
• Where a street abuts or is in the vicinity of a public school, public building community playfield, or
neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context.
• On both sides of minor arterial streets.
• On one or both sides of collector streets.
• As required by zoning code or condition of plan approval.
• When one or more of the context criteria are met (see below).
The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional sidewalk
should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering judgment. An optional
sidewalk may be required when:
• A sidewalk is recommended by the Edina Active (Safe) Routes to School Comprehensive Plan.
• The street is identified as a park or commercial destination.
• Average daily traffic is greater than 500 vehicles.
• 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 mph.
• There is a history of crashes involving pedestrians walking along the roadway.
• Transit stop(s) are present.
• A sidewalk would create a logical connection between destinations.
• Site lines, roadway geometry, or insufficient lighting makes it difficult for motorists to see
pedestrians walking along the roadway.
• The street width is less than 27 feet.
REPORT! RECOMMENDATION
Page 3
Citizen- and/or business-petitioned sidewalk locations will also receive important consideration as they are
brought forward for City review.
Sidewalks within the City are divided into the following three categories. It is possible that a sidewalk may fit
into more than one category:
State-Aid sidewalks are located adjacent to Municipal State-Aid Streets (MSAS).
Active Routes to School sidewalks are identified by the Edina Active Routes to School
Comprehensive Plan (approved on Feb 3,2014) as recommended to improve connectivity and safe
routes to schools.
City sidewalks are sidewalks that meet the requirements and/or context criteria above.
Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide to provide adequate space for two pedestrians to comfortably
pass side-by-side. Wider sidewalks (8 to 12 feet) are recommended where pedestrians are likely to travel in
groups, such as near schools and in shopping districts, or where adjacent to transit stops.
A standard minimum 5-foot boulevard (the space between the sidewalk and the curb or edge of pavement)
shall be provided whenever possible to increase pedestrian safety and comfort, as well as providing space for
snow storage. Minimum planted boulevard widths may be three feet (see following paragraph).
In shopping districts characterized by zero-lot lines, street furniture and/or on-street parking, sidewalks may
be wider with no boulevard. Additionally, a shallower boulevard or curbside sidewalk may be constructed
when the cost of constructing a five-foot boulevard would be excessively disproportionate due to existing
right-of-way or topographical constraints. Curbside sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 6 feet
unobstructed for travel (5 feet clear of sign posts, traffic signals, utility poles, etc., plus one foot for snow
storage/clearing operations).
Financing of the future sidewalks are separated into two categories:
I. State-Aid Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State-Aid designated roadway
and are paid by a combination of State-Aid funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund.
2. Active Routes to School and City Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a
non-State-Aid designated roadway and are paid 100 percent by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
(PACS) Fund.
The City should search out additional funding sources, such as grants or partnering with other agencies, for
larger projects that have regional significance. One potential important source is the Safe Routes to School
Program in which Mn/DOT allocates federal funds to projects of merit selected on a competitive basis.
Sidewalks located on State-Aid roads or within the Public School Zones will be maintained by the City of
Edina. Typical City maintenance includes snow removal and repair of broken or shifted sidewalks.
Sidewalks located in other areas must be maintained by the property owners.
Attachments:
6 Resolution No. 2014-137
• Sidewalk Facilities Map: Figure 7.10
• Sidewalk Criteria Matrix
• Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of Oct. 22, 2014
• Resident comments via Speak Up! Edina
• Resident email correspondence received during comment period
• Resident Petition received Oct. 28, 2014
G:\PW\CENTRAI _ SVCS\ ENG DIV\ PROJECTS IMPR NOS \ I3A391 Living Streets \ Sidewalk Facilities for Approval \item VLB: Public Hearing_Siciewalk Facilities Map.docx
RES OLUT 0.2014-137
RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
TO REVISE AND REPLACE THE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SECTION OF
TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 7
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. BACKGROUND.
1.01 The Comprehensive Plan states that "sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for all
individuals of all ages, decreased the dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active
lifestyles." The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that in order for the City's sidewalk system
to be effective, it should provide network continuity with broad geographic coverage and
without notable gaps.
1.02 In the City's 2013 Quality of Life Survey, 73 percent of respondents indicated that Edina needs
more sidewalks.
1,03 In December of 2012, the City created the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund, which is
a dedicated source of funding for the construction and maintenance of non-motorized
transportation infrastructure. Property owners are no longer assessed for new sidewalks.
1.04 In August of 2013, the City Council unanimously approved the Living Streets Policy, which
includes the following principle: "The City will plan, design, and build high quality
transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists,
children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and
providing access and mobility for all modes."
1.05 As part of the overall Living Streets Plan, staff has been preparing a new Sidewalk Facilities
Map based in part on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, the approved Living Streets policy and
input from City staff, officials and residents.
1.06 At their July 1 Work Session, City Council expressed a desire to approve an updated Sidewalk
Facilities Map prior to the approval of the overall Living Streets Plan (anticipated by early of
2015). Council also directed staff to bring the Sidewalk Facilities Map forward for amendment
into the Comprehensive Plan, so that an approved sidewalk network can be considered during
the planning and design of current and future roadway reconstruction projects.
1.07 On October 22, 2014 a public hearing was held with the Planning Commission regarding
amending the Sidewalk Facilities Map to the Comprehensive Plan. At that meeting testimony
was heard and the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
1.08 The following is the timeline for approvals and amendment to the City of Edina
Comprehensive Plan:
EDINA PUBLIC WORKS & PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY
7450 Metro Boulevard a Edina, Minnesota 55439
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137
Page 2
o Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) October 3
• Informational packet received by Council October 7
• Planning Commission Public Hearing and Approval of Amendment October 22
O Sidewalk Facilities Map posted for public comment (Speak Up, Edina!) October 27
• City Council Public Hearing and approval of Comprehensive Plan amendment November 3
1.09 The proposed amendment indicates the Edina streets that currently have sidewalks along with
those streets where sidewalks are planned in the next 20 to 30 years. The following should be
noted:
O The Plan is not meant to indicate on which side of the street future sidewalks are to be
installed; that decision will be based on input from more thorough engineering studies and
stakeholders prior to design and installation
O If a sidewalk is not indicated on a particular street, this does not preclude that street from
being considered for a sidewalk in the future as its context criteria (e.g. traffic counts,
speeds, redevelopment) may change over time, and residents are free to petition for a
sidewalk as well.
O Future sidewalk design (e.g. location, boulevard width) can vary depending on impacts
such as existing trees, steep slopes, etc.
Section 2. FINDINGS
2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings:
1. Goals of the Comprehensive Plan include safe walking, bicycling and driving, and
promoting health; the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting these goals
by planning for a citywide pedestrian transportation network based on adopted policy
and data.
2. The City's Living Streets Policy states that sidewalks are required on all arterial and
collector streets, and where streets abut a public school, public building, community
playfield or neighborhood park; the proposed amendment meets these goals.
3. The proposed amendment reflects thoughtful and considerable construction of criteria, is
data-driven, and is consistent with the Living Streets Policy vision and value of
supporting the transportation needs of all Edina's residents.
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137
Page 3
Section 3. APPROVAL
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the
Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows, subject to Metropolitan Council approval:
Pedestrian and Bike Facilities
Pedestrian Facilities
The goal of this section is to build upon the current City practices to create a framework for planning
and implementation of future sidewalks. Sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities are an important
component of the City's transportation infrastructure.
Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages and abilities, decrease the
dependency on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. An effective municipal sidewalk
system provides network continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users
and uses, without notable gaps.
A-therotth-review-of--the-existing--siklewalk-aiid-path-network-has been-completeEl-by-C-ity Staff. The
following ea tegories-were use-d-to-eva I uate-exis ting-faeilities-and-help-deter-rn e-a pprop A-ate-locations
for-future-sidewallifhese-eategories-a-re-genenilly listed-in-descending order-of priority:
a Parh-and-aetivity-eenter-walhing-zones
-a—Retail-business walk int;zones
a---Roads where high vehiele-t--IffievolumeS-ewate an-iinpediment-to-pedestrian
movements
4,—Roads-defined-as-CoReetors and-above
a—RoaIs-Avith-State-Aid-designation
-a ;Sidewalks internal to-hirger sites
C-z-en-andionbuSinesJ petit-ioned-loeations-will-also-reeeive.-important-e-onsideration-as-they-are
brought-forward-for City review:
A-walhingo-ile-of-0:7-miles-was-used-for-publie-an ivate-elementary-sehoolsTretail-business
eonters-and parks,-A-one-mile-walhing-zone-was-used-fomiddle and-senior high-sehools (beth-public
and-private). These-zones are-eansistent-A-A4th-the-Edina-Sehool-Laistriet-g,uidelines,
SiEleal-ks-within-the-City are divided-into-the-followin our-eategoriesi
State--Aid-sidewalks-are4oeated-adjaeent-to-Munieipal-aate Aid Streets-(1v1--SAS)-and-are
funded-from-MSAS funds.
*—Publie-sehool-walking-zones
School ZO-11-Citiewalks-are-identified by the-City-and-Edina-Sehool 1)istriet-and-are-loeated
withinthe-identilled-sehool-walldngiZelles,
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137
Page 4
Destination-ZURC-Sidewalks-are-typically-loea-ted along-roadways-that-link-existing-s-ysteins
and-carry-over 7-50-ve1vic1es per-da y:-Exa-rnples-of-destination nodes arc business districts,
park&and-other-eommunity-aetivity-areas:
Loeal-i-Low-Volnine-Street-Zone-sidelvalks-a-re-any-sidewalks that-do-not-ineet any-of-the
above-definitionsrhat-have-importance-from-aeees nd-oystein-eontinuity-perspeetives:
12i-gure-740-depicts ex-isting-antl-proposed-futture-sidetvalk-locations-based-on-information-and-eriterk}
.13 FERLi ded-ab ove,The-cons tr tiet-ien-of-new-siflewa 11; 3 a nd-patbways-is-performed-in-aeeoreia-nee-w-itli
en-rrent-praetic-es-as-di-rectod-by-the-City-of-lidina- .xineefing-Pepa-rtinerit
-A-bonlevard,style-sidewal-k-is-reeommendecl-for-new-eons-truc.-=ticm-wherever-feasible-to-maKimi-ze
sof ety-eonditions-forLpeelestrians. Sidewal-k-s--should4le-designed-to-minimize.-impaets-to-large-trees;
avoid-stee1-g-ra4es-,-and-genera-14y-aeearomo1a-te-otber site-eonstrainteoinetfie-limitations-way
farce a sidewalk-to-be placed along the-edge-oh*1-roadAvay.
Ski ewalks-a-re-typieally-fi ve feet-i.%Lidekhowever-,-a-fortr-fool-width-is aeceptable-foFboulevai,d-style
sidewalks-when-not-maintaineel-by-the-C-ity-of-ELtina-,13onlevard-4dtbs-shonkl-be-app-rm-imatel)4i-ve
feet-wide-to alloi-v-proper-groivth-of-soch
12-inaneing-of-theTreposed-sidewalk-s-are-sei)afated-into-fou-r-eategeriesi
.1,---State-A-i-d-Gosts-cover-any-propesed-sidewalk--loeated-adjaeent-to-a,State A-icl-tiesignatecl
feildwa-y4a€1-a-re-paid400-pereentby State-Aid-fonds;
ds7-25-percent-Sehool-fundsi
and-50-pereent-Speeial Property Assessments.
3-1-4-estinat-lon-Zene-C-osts w4l1-be-sp1it-between-I5-percen-t-Gity-funds-and-75-pereen1-Spec-k4
Prop Cf ty A GSC,Xinents.
4,--boealitow-Volume-Street-Zone-C-osts-,w-ill-be-financed400-pereent-throngh--Speeial Property
Assessments:
Speeia-l-propertassessmeilt-policy shotild-he-reviewed-for-eaehAnLlividual-pr-ojed-.--The-Gity-has-the
disc-retionto-order--a-projeet-a-ssessed-on-a-per-adjaeent-lot-hasisrper-localarea-assessmenter-a
eambinahon-of-both,
Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians between the roadway and adjacent
land uses. Sidewalks are the most important component of pedestrian mobility. They provide
opportunities for active living and access to destinations and critical connections between multiple
modes of travel, as users of motor vehicles, transit and bicycles all must walk at sonic time during
their trip.
Refer to the Sidewalk Facilities Map (Figur'? 7,10) for locations of existing and proposed future
sid ewa lks.
Sidewalks are required:
O Where a street abuts or is in the vicinity of a public school, public building, coiruntinity
playfield, or neighborhood park. Termini to be determined by context.
O On both sides of minor arterial streets.
O On one or both sides of collector streets.
O As required by zoning code or condition of plan approval.
O When one or more of the context criteria are met (see below).
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137
Page 5
The following context criteria may be used when determining whether an otherwise optional
sidewalk should be required. The criteria may be applied in any combination, using engineering
judgment. An optional sidewalk may be required when:
• A sidewalk is recommended by the Edina Active (Safe) Routes to School Comprehensive Plan.
• The street is identified as a park or commercial destination.
• Average daily traffic is greater than 500 vehicles.
• 85th percentile speed is greater than 30 mph.
• There is a history of crashes involving pedestrians walking along the roadway.
• Transit stop(s) are present.
• A sidewalk would create a logical connection between destinations.
• Site lines, roadway geometry, or insufficient lighting makes it difficult for motorists to see
pedestrians walking along the roadway.
• The street width is less than 27 feet.
Citizen- and/or business-petitioned sidewalk locations will also receive important consideration as
they are brought forward for City review.
Sidewalks within the City are divided into the following three categories. It is possible that a sidewalk
may fit into more than one category:
State-Aid sidewalks are located adjacent to Municipal State-Aid Streets (IvISAS).
Active Routes to School sidewalks are identified by the Edina Active Routes to School '
Comprehensive Plan (approved on Feb 3, 2014) as recommended to improve connectivity and
safe routes to schools.
City sidewalks are sidewalks that meet the requirements and/or context criteria above.
Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide to provide adequate space for two pedestrians to
comfortably pass side-by-side. Wider sidewalks (8 to 12 feet) are recommended where pedestrians are
likely to travel in groups, such as near schools and in shopping districts, or where adjacent to transit
stops.
A standard minimum 5-foot boulevard ((he space between the sidewalk and the curb or edge of
pavement) shall be provided whenever possible to increase pedestrian safety and comfort, as well as
providing space for snow storage. Minimum planted boulevard widths may be three feet (see
following paragraph).
In shopping districts characterized by zero-lot lines, street furniture and/or on-street parking,
sidewalks may be wider with no boulevard. Additionally, a shallower boulevard or curbside
sidewalk may be constructed when the cost of constructing a five-foot boulevard would be
excessively disproportionate due to existing right-of-way or topographical constraints. Curbside
sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 6 feet unobstructed for travel (5 feet clear of sign posts,
traffic signals, utility poles, etc., plus one foot for snow storage/clearing operations).
Financing of the future sidewalks are separated into two categories:
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137
Page 6
1. State-Aid Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State-Aid designated
roadway and are paid by a combination of State-Aid funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist
Safety (PACS) Fund.
?. Active Routes to School and City Costs cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a
non-State-Aid designated roadway and are paid 100 percent by the Pedestrian and Cyclist
Safety (PACS) Fund.
The City should search out additional funding sources, such as grants or partnering with other
agencies, for larger projects that have regional significance. One potential important source is the Safe
Routes to School Program in which Mn/ DOT allocates federal funds to projects of merit selected on a
competitive basis.
Sidewalks located on State-Aid roads or within the Public School Zones will be maintained by the
City of Edina. Typical City maintenance includes snow removal and repair of broken or shifted
sidewalks. Sidewalks located-en-Locall-Low-Voltme-Sifeet Zones-and-DestirratIonT-Zones-mtt-st-be
mairaoined-by-the-property ow-nem in other areas must be maintained by the property owners.
Bike Facilities
In 2006, the City Council appointed the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF), made up of citizens interested
in bicycle issues and planning. The BETF has overseen the preparation of the City of Edina
Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, which is hereby adopted by reference and included as
Appendix T-2. This document provides a detailed identification of current conditions and problem
areas regarding bicycle facilities within the City. It also provides a vision regarding system-wide
improvements to the City's bicycling facilities.
It is the goal of the City to improve conditions for bicycling by reducing hazards and by developing
and improving Edina's bicycle transportation infrastructure so as to invite Edina residents, workers,
and visitors to include bicycling as part of their daily mobility activities. Bicycle improvements will be
implemented to support safe, efficient, and inviting travel for children riding to school and. adults
riding to work, as well as recreational users. It is hoped that enhancing biking activities will remove a
significant number of vehicular trips from Edina's roadway system.
The guiding principles for improving bicycle facilities in Edina are as follows:
• Improve safety conditions for cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists
• Provide safe routes for all ages and ability levels
•
Improve connections to local and regional destinations
• Provide a useful and realistic transportation method within the City
• Promote bicycling to improve community health
One of the key tools that will be used by the City to improve its overall bicycling system as outlined
above is a recommended route network as identified in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation
Plan. This network is provided as Figure 7.11 of this Comprehensive Plan Update. It is divided into
primary routes and secondary routes. The City intends to first focus on integrating the primary routes
into existing infrastructure before proceeding with the secondary routes. Prior to system
improvements being implemented in this manner, they will need to be reviewed by the City's
Engineering and Planning Departments to confirm technical feasibility and to refine design elements
as warranted.
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-137
Page 7
Implementation of bicycle system infrastructure improvements will be a relatively long-term
undertaking that will be broken down into implementation phases or time periods. The planning and
implementation of these improvements take into account regional trail systems and associated
improvements, as well as more general infrastructure planning on the part of the City and Hennepin
County.
ATTEST:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of November 3, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014.
City Clerk
1.) Calvin
Go School
Montessor
Edina Momingsidc
Church
1.1.11.4
LIA
) !
I She'pard-of=1: the s
Lut
I CZ7257....,..,..„..,MIILAcsiev BLVD
,•(
t
1.1
„
1 1--
11
0. \<c• , .., _ ,
7-- -- ,
.___,
.. , .-
',/- .
, r ,
i
? ,
. 1 i , ..... s
7,1
. • ,. _
, „......"-i Good
4 --, ty 41.1.
1 ilm.dtildi:: _ 4 4% ,,,..,, fir......_,,, ---.... ......„...... 1 ti* k \Th
1 . 1.r.c•rii ' I
•,,Countryside
...:CItMel j. "^, , i 70001 ..............
II iEs .t. S I
Comiregn °nal ‘. \ li,,,,,
1 \ ‘..5 \ n ,,....1....1
. 2 '
• ''...;
V -.''..'•;:7,11
\ w
I t f C,OM7CW .. 1W, eutheam
rr
Lake
•
oh
St Stephens
Eptscopat
4/4
a
I
00111 51W
ocenant
. Publi cj
. 't.r2lbra
I "DDLr mreoch I —I Grace Cn t
LL Southvicw lri-ligh--,
Edina f SIM ST 0/
Center 1 . "7".""""""= I
Communily I
I 1 . 1
(`' \ I
1 s .,,,.. ,...
• aGraflice,c14h
IN 1
Coalman* ;bat:rel.
),
54Th ST W
V. St PCiers Umbel/ j
2 ChuiCh & Setae .-_---' 1
a I
,..._.....---"'
MI •
Highland
Selmol .11•
....... .i.--...t,_1 Age . # -.o de c, Creek Valley 1 ,okk
-., Creek School 6 Sms... `.-----__-,._, Valley I
\..mno.m.. _ Baptist 1 a
Il ... `- / j. .'nn...--'"'"•/:,74 a ---- ....no ,........ I,— '...„....."..., en. .,, \
-1,High
School
Edina
a 1 Valley View —1
,(A-17.LEY VIEW rzfil ir Hi° --11
Calvary Lutheran Xc
70111 57 W .1.:PCI:istn'terian •L Church
Or •
DEWEY HILL RD
\
'.4741
Lake
Edina
1.•n •••n •n •n •••••
0.
1 76111 ST W
•
MINNESOTA DR
...... 1=10. .---- guy es.
Come in I
# Schoo
a'a
Legend Future
Active Routes
To School Sidewalk
Future
City Sidewalk
Future
Nine Mile Creek
Regional Trail
Existing Future
Sidewalk
State-Aid Sidewalk
CV,cy olT. Edina
20D8 Comprenenshfe Prian Update
W E Sdevvallk FaciHtnes
Engineering Dept Figure 7.10
October 2014
Edina Sidewalk Facilities Plan: Criteria Matrix
Streets listed below are local streets as defined in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan (according to the Sidewalk Facilities Plan, sidewalks are required on Minor Arterial
and Collector Streets)
Quadrant Street Name(s)
Average Daily
Traffic
(vehicles)
85th%
Speed
(mph)
Additional Comments
Northeast Arden Ave S / Minnehaha Blvd 500 Connects/adjacent to Arden Park
Northeast Beard Ave S 400 Connects/adjacent to Strachauer Park
Northeast Concord Ave 1,300 Connects to Southview Middle School, Kuhlman Field
Northeast W 48th St 1,000
Northeast Morningslde Rd 1,800 38
Northeast W 49th St Pending traffic/speed counts
Northeast W 52nd St 475 Connects to Arden Park, trail
Northeast W 55th St Connects to York Park
Northeast W 58th St 1,000-3,300 33 Connects three collector streets to Pamela Park
Northeast W 59th St 575 31 Connects to Concord School
Northeast W 60th St 1,100 Connects to Pamela Park, St, Johns Park
Northwest Arbor Ave 310 30 Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Northwest Ayrshire Blvd 890 33 Connects Highlands Park and School
Northwest Benton Ave 931 Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Northwest Division St / Cooper Ave 1,000 34 Connects two collector streets to Todd Park
Northwest Doncaster Way 425 32 Connects/adjacent to Highlands Park
Northwest Glengarry Pkwy Adjacent to Highlands Park
Northwest Hansen Rd 1,700 32 Connects to Birchcrest Park
Northwest Interlachen Blvd / Park Terrace / Malibu Dr 1,100-2,200 Connects toTH 169 & Van Valkenberg Park
Northwest Lincoln Dr / Dovre Dr / Londonberry Rd / 5tauder Cir 1,750 32
Northwest Malibu Dr / Telemark Tr / Parkwood Rd / Parkwood In 1,500 34 Connects to TH 169 & Van Valkenberg Park
Northwest Mirror Lakes Dr 730 32 Connects to Highlands Park
Northwest Olinger Rd 1,900 37 Connects to Bredesen Park
Northwest Schaefer Rd 1,300 35
Northwest Sun Rd 3,070 31 Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Northwest Valley View Rd / Maddox In / Normandale Rd 1,500-2,600 38 Connects to bridges across TH 100 & TH 62
Northwest W 60th St 4,000 36
Northwest Wyman Ave 1,500 Pedestrian access across TH 62
Southeast Barrie Rd / Heritage Dr 1,350-3,650 32
Southeast Claremore Dr Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Southeast Cornelia Dr 2,000 35 Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Southeast Kellogg Ave Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Southeast Normandale Rd 1,200 35
Southeast Oaklawn Ave 1,800 35 Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Southeast W 64th St Connection to beacon crossing of Xerxes Ave
Southeast W 65th St Connection to hospital/medical area
Southeast West Shore Dr 1,300 32 Active Routes to School-recommended sidewalk
Southeast Wooddale Ave S 1,000
Southwest Amundson Ave Adjacent to retail/business area
Southwest Braemar Blvd 1,000 32 Connects to Braemar Golf Course, Golf Dome, Arena
Southwest Bush Lake Rd 4,500 34
Southwest Dewey Hill Rd /W 74th St 3,400 Connects to Lewis Park
Southwest Indian Hills Pass 1,300 34 Connects to Creek Valley Elementary
Southwest Nordic Cir Adjacent to Creek Valley School
Southwest Ridgeview Rd /Abercrombie Dr / Ra burn Dr 460 30
Southwest Tracy Ave / W 66th St 1,500 33
Southwest W 63rd St / Ridgeview Dr 2,700 34
Southwest Ohms In 2,700 32
Southwest Warren Ave 500 33 Connects/adjacent to Normandale Park
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment: "Sidewalk Facilities Plan"
Staff presentation
Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner addressed the Commission and presented a
Sidewalk Facilities Plan for an amendment to the Pedestrian and Bike Facilities section
of the Comprehensive Plan. Nolan explained the "nSidewalk Facilities Plan is
based on part of the 2008 Comprehensive plan, the Living Streets policy and input from
City staff. Nolan said at a work session the City Council requested an updated
Sidewalks Facilities Plan prior to final approval,orglivin reets Plan.
Nolan noted currently the "Plan" is in the "public comment" period the process with
the Council scheduled to hear the proposed amendment on November 3, 2014. Nolan
concluded that numerous comments in support 9f the "Plan" have beer received;
including two negative comments„,
Discussion
Commissioner Seeley asked Mr. Nolarll it was found that pedestrians are unsafe
without sidewalks. Nolan responded their findings pedestrians are safer off the
Commissioner Platteter:;;Cdmmejtedthat thaproposed amendment is a piece of the
proposed Living Stteets Plan The LivingStreets Plan could fold into the
Comprehenie Planiwhem
CommiSSIdner Lee aske. r. NotJf there was flexibility in sidewalk size. Mr. Nolan
responded there is an element of flexibility, however, the City's goal is for a 5-foot
boulevard and A7foot sidewalk Lee qtlestioned how sidewalks are prioritized. Nolan
said as the City develops its lCapital Improvements Plan sidewalks are prioritized.
Sidewalks can also be done on case by case basis for safety reasons, connectivity to
schools, etc.
A discussion ensued wittitommissioners wondering if streets can be narrowed, if
boulevards are private or publicly owned and who is responsible for boulevard and
sidewalk maintenance.
In response to questions Mr. Nolan explained that streets can be narrowed when
opportunities arise. Boulevards in residential areas are generally publically owned;
however maintenance of the boulevard falls to the property owners. Nolan said
discussions on boulevard plantings continue; reiterating boulevard maintenance is done
by the property owners. Continuing, Nolan also reported that sidewalk maintenance
street.
pdate
Chair Staunton opened the public„bearing.
Public Testimony
Deanne Dubbs, 5316 Maddox Lane a
sidewalks.
ommiSSion on the issue of „..
Tom Dewey, 5612
sidewalks
cord verlUe addreSSe, "the Commission on the issue of
Two resideolts on West S Of, Drivéäd dressed the Commission on the issue of
sidewalks.
Discussion
falls to the property owners unless they are located on a State-Aid road or road
connecting to public schools.
Questions were raised if sidewalks reduce vehicle speed and if a narrower street
reduces speed. Mr. Nolan responded he doesn't believe the introduction of sidewalks in
itself reduce vehicle speed; however, when other engineering tools are implemented
such as narrowed streets, bump outs, plantings, etc. speed is reduced.
Commissioners asked if a tree study would be done during the sidewalk process,
acknowledging trees could be lost through sidewalk construction. Mr. Nolan responded
all sidewalks are subject to a feasibility study, propertyr,4Ce, public input etc. Nolan
also said study is also done on which side of the street is for the sidewalk and
where possible trees would be saved.
Commissioner Platteter said with regard to si Oialks and tree e has seen sidewalks
introduced that actually go around trees. ,Nolan agreed, adding:apreviously
mentioned all sidewalks are thoroughly studied and noticed befoi*Constructed.
Commissioner atfeter moved to closethe public hearing. Commissioner Lee
seconded the mode - All ioikI aye; motion to close public hearing approved.
Commissioner Forresttor*, ented as she understands it a sideway improvement plan
and public input prrocessVrequired before City Council approves specific sidewalk
locations. Continuing, Forrest said what's before the Commission this evening is an
amendment that updates the Comprehensive Sidewalk Facilities Plan. This "update"
provides the public with information on future sidewalk locations. Nolan agreed,
reiterating all sidewalk improvement plans would be noticed and heard by the City
Council before constructed; adding sidewalks can also "go away" or be added as the
City evolves. The Comprehensive Plan Sidewalks Facilities plan doesn't signify
immediate sidewalk construction.
Commissioner Hobbs stated in his opinion its good that the City provides residents with
a sidewalk facilities plan. Commissioners and Chair Staunton agreed, adding it
provides transparency.
Motion
Commissioner Olsen moved approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All
voted aye; motion carried.
Chair Staunton reiterated he supports the amendment adding transparency is important
and the Sidewalk and Bike Facilities Plan provides that transparency . Staunton further
noted all proposed sidewalks will be noticed by thQ City and heard by the City Council
for review and approval. This also provides residents with the,ability to share their
concerns or support for sidewalks in their are
VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Lot Division. David Hen
Staff Presentation
20 Kelse Terrace, Edina, MN
Planner Teague reported that Mr. David endebehalf of the property owners Paul
and Jean Mooty, islWdbestingjkshift thai:6?(,)$ tng lot liriethat divides the property at
n '°'"" 5320 Kelsey Terrace and Outlot of the F''r,kw'ood Knolls 26th Addition. Both properties
are owned by the Modt0 The purpose of the :request is to shift the side lot line to the
north to make room for an ion.fdahe. existing home. The Outlot appears to be a
leftoverirnsfiTaiii*OplkwddKnolls 26a4lition; that ended up being platted as an
Outlot. The Outlot oiti,riafly appears as p.4it=4:Lot 26 in the Preliminary Plat.
Planner Teague conctuded t that staff recommends that the City Council approve the
Lot Division btP20 Kelsey'Terrace and Outlot B of Parkwood Knolls 26th Addition
subject to the fib 'Owing findings:
1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot.
2. The Outlot and °5320 Kelsey Terrace are both held under the same ownership.
The properties appear to be one lot.
3. The existing utilities on the Outlot would not be impacted.
Approval is also subject to the following condition:
1. The existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated prior to filing of the
approving resolution with Hennepin County.
Discussion
Commissioners questioned why minor lot line rearrangements and party wall divisions
can't be accomplished administratively. Teague explained that at this time Code
requires Commission and Council review.
Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion the lot should be combined as one
lot; not continue as two. Teague responded that would require a re-platting and at this
time the property owner has requested this action.
Motion
Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend approval based on staff
findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Hobbs seconded the
motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Olsen, Carr, Platte er;:forrest, Siatihton. Nay; Lee. Motion
carried.
Page 1 of 14 City of Edina
City of Edina
I
• Discussions
sigh wpm
• Ideas
• Meetings
Dail Surve ys
email address...
PasspRcillellaoe
I password...
or, Si with:
Conn mi tip
Like
Tweet;
Share
-.n 11 111 L -]
•
451 1116) 1 i
rr
_A
i
We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an
even better Place for living, learning, raising families and doing business.
Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you
see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina!
r SHARE your feedback! POST your ideas! ). JOIN the disoussio),!
This Discussion channel is currently closed.
Discussion: Sidewalk Plan
The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Plan, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets
where sidwalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new plan will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the
Comprehensive Plan. There are two public hearings scheduled where residents can testify regarding this topic: 7 p.m. Oct. 22 Planning
Commission meeting and 7 p.m. Nov. 3 City Council meeting. Opinions expressed here will be given to the City Council on Nov. 3.
• Home
Projects
2 Topics
50 Answers I Closed 2014-10-27
View Discussion
Topic: Future Sidewalks
View the map of the proposed sidewalk plan. Do you have any additional suggestions on where future sidewalks should go? If so, where?
43 Responses
13 Responses
NIIIICV Niiika 23 days ago
Please lead the discussion with SLP to improve the sidewalk on Morningside from Oakdale to Wooddale. Especially with the new development
and increased traffic is imperative that we overcome the bureaucracy that continues to stand in the way of safety and community needs.
2 Supports
City of Edina Page 2 of 14
comment...
Reply to Nancy Killilea
L arry Olson 22 days ago
This looks like a well laid out and well thought out plan. It's good to see the criteria which determines where Inture sidewalks should go. It's not
saying to put a sidewalk on every street. With the new PACs funding from a franchise fee on gas and electric bills, the burden of paying for these
sidewalks is relieved fivin homeowners. Also, sidewalks on school routes are plowed by the city.
3 Supports
comment...
Reply to Larry Olson I
vs
Sean I lav ford Olean. 21 days ago
Two specific gaps not addressed by the plan: the west side of York/Xerxes ave is missing sidewalk for 100-200 feet just north of 66th St (a right
turn simply cuts into the space of the sidewalk and completely replaces it). This should be marked as future sidewalk. I also think both sides of the
77th St overpass of TH 100 must be marked for future sidewalks. I understand the existing bridge may not be wide enough to do this -- but future
means future. In the long run, it is not reasonable to expect pedestrians on the north side to cross 4 intersections in this busy interchange when they
should only have to cross 2.
1 also think that there should be substantially more sidewalks in the gridded portions of Edina (bordering Hopkins and Minneapolis). Sidewalks
create huge value and provide great mobility options for denser, gridded blocks (as they do right now in the Country Club District).
2 Supports
Alert:Nolan, Transportation Planner admin 20 days ago
Thanks for your suggestions Sean! The W. 77th Street bridge over Highway 100 is part of a minor arterial, and should indeed have sidewalks
indicated for both sides. That change will be made. As for the west side of Xerxes Ave north of W. 66th, right-of-way restrictions may be an issue
there but we will look to incorporate that into our plan as well. Thanks again!
0 Supports
comment..
Reply I Reply to Mark Nolan I
comment...
I Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary I
Sean Hayford Oleo IN 21 days ago
And apologies for the double posting, but the Delete button doesn't work in Chrome or Firefox. lion administrator were so inclined to delete one
of those posts (and this one), that would be great!
comment...
City of Edina Page 3 of 14
o Supports
Jordan Citerobach admin 21 days ago
Thanks for the heads up, Sean! I've deleted the double post and will let our vendor know of the issue.
0 Supports
comment...
I Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach
comment...
I Reply to Sean Hayford Cleary I
David Ft-cake! 21 days ago
I am a proponent of sidewalks but there is a large group of people opposed to them. For the sake of transparency how is the city taking both views
into account in building new sidewalks?
0 Supports
Reply to David Frenkel I
IVitliato Da, id 21 days ago
I fully support adding sidewalks in the recommended areas of Chowen Park (including next to my house on 60th St.) Both 58th and 60th Streets .
are heavily traveled by both drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Sidewalks and minor traffic calming modifications will slow speeding traffic and
make it safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Our family hopes the City implements these improvements soon!
6 Supports
30:in Orth at October 20, 201.1 ii 11:35ian CDT
I agree. There is quite a bit of pedestrian traffic on W. 60th St. between France and Xerxes, as well as 58th St. One pedestrian was killed between
Xerxes and York. The morning or evening sun is a contributing hazard.
0 Supports
Comment...
Reply to Joan Orth I
comment ..
Reply to VVilliam David I
comment...
City of Edina Page 4 of 14
William David 21 days ago
I fully support adding sidewalks in the recommended areas of Chowen Park (including next to my house on 60th St.) I3oth 58th and 60th Streets
are heavily traveled by both drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. Sidewalks and minor traffic calming modifications will slow speeding traffic and
make it safer and more comfortable for pedestrians. Our family hopes the City implements these improvements soon!
3 Supports
Reply to William David
Karen Sandler Shiner! Karca Sandler Sieinerl 21 days ago
Thank you for including West 62nd Street bordering Pamela Lake in the plan. This street is very dangerous to pedestrians and given that it is near a
park that is currently expanding its parking lot, the addition of sidewalks are much needed.
5 Supports
comment...
Reply to Karen Sandler Steiner' Karen Sandler Steinert I
Chris Bremer 21 days ago
I am glad to see the proposed sidewalks on Xerxes, Beard, and 60th, as well as on the east side of France. I hope that, when these sidewalks are put
in, the unnecessarily wide streets %%'ill be made narrower, in keeping with the adopted Living Streets policy -- that would make things safer by
slowing traffic and might also save a number of trees. I would like to see the short stretch of sidewalk on France Ave in front of Fairview
Southdale Hospital put in place -- any chance the hospital would fund that rather than waiting for the city to pay for it? It would allow everyone
who leaves east of France to walk to Southdale without having to cross France Ave (via the sidewalk from Ewing to France, by Hwy 62).
2 Supports
Isaac Broberg 20 days ego
Lets keep in mind also it is hard enough for those of us living on France Ave to pull out of our driveways. At the current time most of us have a
parking buffer where we are able to pull into. Albeit, often times still honked at by drivers who are speeding by no less as if we are in their way.
France %vorks just fine with one side of sidewalk near my place around 58th to the hwy, I rarely see people walking by.
0 Supports
Sean I laviord Olean 20 days ago
City of Edina Page 5 of 14
The trouble with a really busy street like France having a sidewalk on only one side is that people on the "wrong" side of the street have to get
across the very busy street to access the sidewalk. Just as it's hard to get out of your driveway, it's very hard to negotiate a gap in traffic to cross if
you don't happen to be at a light. France is also a bus route, so it can be difficult to access and wait at stops without sidewalks on both sides.
If no pedestrians are present, then it should be OK to poll into the sidewalk area (after checking for peds) to better see traffic on France.
1 Support
Chris 13remer 20 days ago
If they included some landscaped bumpouts on France along with a sidewalk it could provide protection for residents as they exit their driveways,
as well as affording pedestrians on a new sidewalk a bit more separation from traffic..
0 Supports
comment ...
Reply to Isaac Broberg
Sean I v rd Olean. 20 days ago
Agreed -- Xerxes is horrendously wide, especially between Crosstown and 66th. I appreciate the value of on-street parking on these streets, but it
would be nicer if it were broken up by bumpouts (like Lyndale just north of Minnehaha Creek),
0 Supports
Chris Bremer 20 days ago
Xerxes happens to be a county road, which is how we got the ugly bumpouts north of the Crosstown on that street -- they just don't have the money
to do something attractive as an add-on. Though when the street is totally reconstructed perhaps they could do something. Well-placed bumpouts
would make it easier for people to get out of their driveways.
0 Supports
comment...
Reply to Sean Hayford Oleary I
comment...
Reply to Chris Bremer
21 days ago
Who maintains them? Who pays for maintenance costs?
comment...
City of Edina Page 6 of 14
0 Supports
Isaac Broberg 20 days ago
Good question. I hope everyone keeps in mind that Edina plows the sidewalks in the winters so more sidewalks means more maintenance costs all
the way around.
0 Supports
Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner ad min 20 days ago
Edina's Public Works crews plow sidewalks that are on State Aid and County roadways, sidewalks that are adjacent/leading to parks and schools,
and in a few other cases. For all other sidewalks (mostly in residential streets/neighborhoods) it is the property owner's responsibility to remove
snow. Other costs associated with sidewalk maintenance are funded by a combination of the Public Works budget and the PACS Fund
(htto://edinamn.cov/pacs fund), Thanks.
I Support
Katherine Stelbere Hass 19 days ago
Yes, that is correct. There will be maintenance costs for sidewalks, just as there are for roads. Sidewalks are a transportation network for many
residents, especially children and older residents who don't drive. It seems perfectly acceptable for the city (and its residents) to provide this public
service for all residents, not just the ones who drive.
3 Supports
comment...
Reply to Isaac Broberg
Reply to San Asato
Dave Bender 21 days ago
I support the plan and sidewalks generally. They'll make the neighborhoods more livable and, properly done, will increase property values. I would
like to see a sidewalk added to the plan on Code Avenue, connecting the proposed sidewalks on Valley View and Benton. That would create a nice
walking loop, shorter than going all the way out to Hansen.
We especially need a sidewalk along Valley View, from Benton to at least Code, That's a natural walking route, and many people with and without
pets walk it, but the cars really haul on the diagonal stretch form Normandale Lutheran to the block past Code (where it makes a sharp right). It
would be good to get a sidewalk along there before a tragedy happens,
2 Supports
comment...
City of Edina Page 7 of 14
'rom La Force 20 days ago
That sidewalk on Valley View was proposed to be part of the Birchcrest B neighborhood reconstruction project. People living on Valley View
opposed it, and the council pulled it out of the project. If the sidewalk plan is adopted, it would be good to see that sidewalk reconsidered because
the neighborhood reconstruction was delayed until next year and both projects could be done more economically together than as separate projects.
0 Supports
Katv Frederick 20 days ago
I live on the corner of Valley View and Mildred, and I would fully support the proposed sidewalk along our property. Drivers fly around the
corners here, and it's just not safe for walkers and bikers. I would hope this public discussion means Mat more than just the people who live along a
particular stretch of proposed sidewalk get to have their opinion considered.
3 Supports
comment...
Reply to Tom LaForce
comment...
Reply to Dave Bender
claire lee 20 days ago
I love that a new sidewalk is being put in on Vernon by Garden Park. I'm not sure who could address the possibility of adding a pedestrian crossing
on Vernon and Garden Park. As of now if you're on the north side of Vernon and want to get over to Garden Park you take your life in your hands
and then may have to climb over a barrier. Thanks for adding the sidewalk from Maloney over to the dog park.
3 Supports
Reply to claire lee I
Aim oisim 20 days ago
It's great to see all of this support for sidewalks. I live on Cornelia Drive between Rosland Park and Cornelia Elementary and I can tell you that we
have a lot of pedestrian traffic that would be much safer if they could use a sidewalk. Kids walking to school (my own son included), families
walking to the park and pool, etc. Currently, with cars and pedestrians sharing the streets there are many times that the pedestrians have to hop up
on the curb (which is impossible in winter), or cars have to come to a stop if there are two cars passing each other on the road or one car is passing
a parked car. It's dangerous.
2 Supports
comment...
comment ...
City of Edina Page 8 of 14
comment...
Reply to Amy Olson I
Katherine Stethem Bass 19 days ago
I am grateful for the carefid consideration of criteria and time the city has put into this plan. The network of sidewalks proposed seems quite
reasonable and fairly conservative -- this is certainly not a "sidewalks on every street" plan that some have predicted. I have a couple of
suggestions to consider as additions -- Indian Hills Pass - while it is a short road, it functions as a neighborhood collector and is directly across
from Creek Valley Elementary. I've heard other parents from CV talk about the need for a safe facility for kids coming from neighborhoods
directly across from the school. Do we know what the volumes are on that road? Also, Gleason Road has sidewalk on the west side, but could we
consider a short segment on the east side with a terminus at Gleason Circle? There are many CV kids on Gleason Circle who walk to school and
this would help them get up to Valley View without crossing mid-block. Thank you!
I Support
Reply to Katherine Stelberg Bass I
Entilv Doettge 19 days ago
Edina has worked hard to improve pedestrian facilities and it is so nice to see the future sidewalk plan continue the effort toward making walking
safe and accessible. We are so lucky to live in a city with great schools, it is encouraging to see that a high priority has been placed on creating safe
routes to school for our kids. This thoughtful plan highlights activity corridors where there is already a lot of pedestrian traffic and aims to put
sidewalks where they are needed most.
3 Supports
comment...
Reply to Emily Boettge I
Salina Swarooa 19 days ago
I am very happy that the City of Edina takes our transportation infrastructure seriously and has developed a strong plan to increase safety for
pedestrians, especially children walking to school and our elderly neighbors. I appreciate that the City has identified the most important gaps and
prioritized them in a way that balances need and cost.
4 Supports
Reply to Sapna Swaroop I
111e2an Flynn' 18 days ago
I'd love to see sidewalks on Monterey to allow children to get to the park at Susan Lindgren more easily and safely!
I Support
City of Edina Page 9 of 14
comment...
I Reply to Megan Flynn
1,1
Joel Stegner, Community volunteer 18 days ago
I am on Barrie Road, two blocks north of 66th. The traffic study has a top end traffic count of 3650, among the highest in the city. Barrie/Heritage
is the one way out of our neighborhood, is very curvy, with lots of cars parked on the street by the Colony and Heritage properties, includes Edina
Towers and houses lots of elderly and lower income people. It is dangerous to walk to the south into Fairview Southdale and surrounding medical
buildings or to Southdale, because there is no continuous sidewalk. Seniors should be out walking just as much as children, and the lack of
sidewalks practically forces them to drive short distance. Given the 20+ year timeline, how many of them will still be alive when a sidewalk gets
put in. I don't see any time lines on the plans. Without timelines, it simply could become a very politicized process which doesn't serve the city
0 Supports
comment ...
Reply to Joel Stegner
Mist.% Ilia:tilts at October 16,2014 at 11:12am CDT
I was surprised to see that the the corner of 55th and Beard is not on the proposed sidewalk list. Hundreds of people walk this area every day to
access the bridge that goes over the creek at this intersection. Is it too late to be considered?
0 Supports
comment...
Reply to Misty Higgins
Dustin Carlson at October 16,2014 at 3:18pin CDT
From up in the Brookside Heights neighborhood, I agree with Claire Lee's comment about adding a pedestrian crossing hear Garden Park. Here's a
situation where there is a lot of road (Vernon) between the Tracy and Eden Avenue crosswalks, so people will cross a high-traffic, high-speed road
on their own. Plus, aren't non-stop light crosswalks fairly inexpensive ways to promote walking? The more crosswalks we add across the city, the
more drivers will see walkers and learn to share the road with people on foot. There's a great crosswalk on on Interlachen Blvd near Vernon and
even though motorists largely disregard it... at least it's a place to get pedestrians predictably crossing the road. More of these low-cost paint-and-
signage crosswalks please (no flashing lights needed).
0 Supports
comment...
I Reply to Dustin Carlson I
isten eke at October 17, 201401 10:00am CDT
I (and other local residents) would like to sec a sidewalk put on Valley View Road from lower Mark Terrace up to Gleason. This is a stretch of
road traveled by students on the way to the middle and high schools. This road has always been a pretty heavily traveled road, and it is getting
comment...
comment...
City of Edina Page 10 of 14
more congested as people seem to use it as a cut through during rush hour times to avoid the highways, I understand that there is a plan to put in a
sidewalk from McCauley to lower Mark Terrace and I believe that is necessary. However, I believe that the stretch to the high school should have
greater priority since kids are using it to walk to school - or would be instead of their parents driving them because of safety concerns. I do not
understand why an additional sidewalk was added in front of St. Pat's when one %'as already on the other side of the street. I realize funding is
always an issue but The Safe Routes to School Committee felt this was necessary, yet apparently do not feel a sidewalk on Valley View Road,
where there is none, was necessary first. I grew up in this neighborhood and am now raising my children here - this sidewalk issue has been
something that has been talked about by residents for over 40 years.
0 Supports
comment...
I Reply to kristen rice I
Jennifer Ilaenel at October 19, 2014 at 9:55pm CDT
I'm very much in support of sidewalks, especially as noted along Oaklawn Ave. However, a proposed sidewalk on Oaklawn Ave. looks to connect
to existing sidewalks to the south, cutting through private property. Is this an error on the map?
0 Supports
Alark Nolan, Transportation Planner ad min at October 20,2014 at 8:51am CDT
Ms. Hoene!, the City of Edina holds a utility easement in this location, split 50/50 between the two adjacent properties. The City's Active Routes to
School Plan recommended making this connection, and Edina has been approved for funding for this connection by the Three Rivers Park District
(the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail will be constructed on Parklawn Ave in 2017). Prior to any construction, the affected property owners will be
involved in discussions regarding this trail connection.
0 Supports
Jennirer Ilnencl at October 20, 2014 at 3:20pm (Tyr
Thanks for clarifying!
0 Supports
Reply to Mark Nolan I
Reply to Jennifer Haenel
Zabel at October 21,2014 al 9:23am CDT
Thank you for putting a future sidewalk where W 66th and Tracy Ave are combined and then following up through Tracy Ave. There are a lot of
school kids and pedestrians that use this half block strip and have no safe place to walk. Traffic is moderately consistent here and it is dangerous at
times, especially during the winter months with ice and snow on the roads and during the summer when the Buckthorn overgrowth and visibility of
comment...
comment...
City of Edina Page 11 of 14
pedestrians is blocked at the stop sign of Valley View Rd and W. 66th/Tracy Ave. I look forward this sidewalk, it cannot come soon enough.
Thank you!!
I Support
comment...
Reply to DK Zabel I
Jim Siromberg at October 22, 2014 at 9:10pm CDT
Another place that could use 'more' sidewalk is 49th St., between France and Maple. Presently, there is a short stretch of sidewalk on the south side
of 49th that only crosses two pieces of property. This two-block stretch of 49th is heavily traveled by cars that try and avoid the traffic around 50th
and France. The road also has a hill midway through that two-block stretch, which also makes walking along this street more hazardous than
normal. It would be great if- at some point in time - this busy little street could have a sidewalk to help residents in this area negotiate the
neighborhood without putting their lives in danger. Thanks for 'listening'.
0 Supports
Heaven Porter at °Mabel- 23, 2014 at 5:52pm CDT
1 agree with the need for a sidewalk on 491h. The 2012 sidewalk addition to Halifax Ave from 51st to 54th solved a similar problem of getting to
50th/France dining and walking. Other busy neighborhood streets including Arden Ave from 50th to Arden Park then east to 52nd/Halifax u'ould
also benefit from a sidewalk for the safety of our community.
0 Supports
comment ...
Reply to Bennett Porter
Reply to Jim Stromberg
(ulna nn illtait at °claim* 27, 2014 at I:05pm CDT
I do not see West 59th Street on the plans. This street from Wooddale to Concord is a main street for Concord Elementary. More than 20 children
walk to/from Concord on West 59th Street every day. Also, parents, teachers and buses are speeding down this street to get to school. There are no
stop signs from Wooddale to Concord on West 59th Street either. On West 59111 Street this sidewalk could go from Pamela Park to Concord
Elementary. This would seem like a likely spot for a sidewalk and it fits the criteria: routes to school, transit stop on wooddale, logical connection
between destinations, it would promote safety in children walking/biking to school. PLEASE CONSIDER WEST 59th STREET- Children walk on
this very busy street to the school!
I Support
Reply to tonya wilholt
comment...
City of Edina Page 12 of 14
Peter Choukalas at October 27, 2014 at 3:47prn CDT
Just a few comments concerning the sidewalk plan. Making Edina a more pedestrian-biker friendly community is a positive move. Now, if we
could just get more drivers to pay attention to us pedestrians and bikers As to the sidewalk plan, consider the following:
A. Complete the sidewalk along Normandale Road so that it meets the 9 mile Creek Regional Trail. B. Continue a walkway around Lake Edina.
It's not a long walk, but would be good for meeting neighbors. C. The walk bridge crossing Highway #62 between Highway #100 and France Ave.
was not included on the map. D. Consider completing the sidewalk from Cornelia School along Mavelle Drive to Lymuar Lane to the north or
Sandell Ave to the north or both to West 70th Street. Also, consider completing the sidewalk south on Lymnar Lane to West 72nd Street. E.
Continue the walkway on the north side of Fred Richards into the park (after The Fred closes to connect with the regional trail that will go through
the park. F. Last, which of the new sidewalks, trails, etc. will be maintained by the City of Edina in the fall and winter, i.e. cleaned of wet leaves in
the fall, and cleared of snow in the winter? Thank-you.
0 Supports
Reply to Peter Choukalas
Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman at October 27, 2014 at 5:37pm CDT
I strongly second adding a sidewalk on 59th Street between Wooddale Ave. and Concord Elemental)'. The residential neighborhood in this area is
very dense and full of Concord children with I) no bus service and 2) no safe walking route to school. Anyone who observes 59th Street during to
"to" and "from" school time will immediately see the problem. 59th is THE STREET that walkers use to get to school - it is the main, and direct
artery leading to Concord Elementary and the neighborhood funnels to this street as a sort orsafety in numbers" default. Countless families walk
this route to and from school, and sadly, share the pavement with speeding cars and buses rushing to and from Concord, as 59th is also the direct
route for vehicles between Wooddale and Concord. Making the pedestrian route worse, is all the overflow, on-street parking (on 59th) the
completely bottlenecks 59th at our kids most vulnerable time. With no sidewalks, and cars parked on both sides of the street, we literally walk
down the middle of the busy road, with the sunrise in the cast making it hard for us to be seen, rushing buses, teachers, and parents. It's just a bad
situation.
A number of us have noted that a sidewalk looks planned for 60th street, which is fine, but 59th should be prioritized ahead of 60th. 59th is simply
THE commuter artery for cars, buses, and most importantly, pedestrians. It needs help. A sidewalk would connect a densely populated
neighborhood to I) a public elementary school with no bus service in the neighborhood, 2) numerous public transportation stops, 3) sports fields,
community centers, voter locations. etc. It simply screams "sidewalk". Thank you!
0 Supports
comment...
IReply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman I
Sign Up
Conned
'email address...
Sign Up
Participants
t
L JI 1
11 L
I
I
Llit,11-./ !LI LI
We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an
even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business.
Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you
see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edina!
n SHARE yam feedback! POST your ideas! P JOIN the discussion!
City of Edina Page 1 of 5
City of Edina
• Home
Pro'ects
• Discussions
Sigh tHims
• Ideas
• Meetines
Endil Surveys
email address...
Pass.wpril p „:4„
I Pasword...
or, SigtfiN with:
Conn ii up
Sign In
Like o
Tweet:
Share
a !
This Discussion channel is currently closed.
Discussion: Sidewalk Plan
The City of Edina is in the process of updating its Sidewalk Facility Plan, which indicates Edina streets that currently have sidewalks and streets
where sidwalks are planned to be added over the next 20 to 30 years. This new plan will be amended into the Pedestrian Facilities section of the
Comprehensive Plan. There are two public hearings scheduled where residents can testify regarding this topic: 7 p.m. Oct. 22 Planning
Commission meeting and 7 p.m. Nov. 3 City Council meeting. Opinions expressed here will be given to the City Council on Nov. 3.
2 Topics I 50 Answers Closed 2014-10-27 I
View Discussion
Topic: Criteria
The City follows a set of criteria (memo vane 2)10 identify where sidewalks should go. What additional criteria should the City consider when
looking at adding future sidewalks?
7 Responses
7 Responses
David Frenhel 21 days ago
There is no mention in the criteria of mature trees near streets which can make it impractical to build sidewalks like Golf Terrace. There should be
requirements to save mature trees.
Ix{
I Support
City of Edina Page 2 of 5
Reply to David Frenkel
comment... ,
Chris limier 21 days ago
There could be a criterion related to access to public transportation. For example, sidewalks should be located to enable bus riders, including those
with disabilities, to get safely to the nearest intersection/curb cut Also, it would great to consider whether a sidewalk in a certain location would
enable better pedestrian access from residential neighborhoods to retail establishments (in addition to parks and schools).
3 Supports
comment...
I Reply to Chris Bremer
Chris Brewer 20 days ago
The sidewalk plan should also be coordinated with the county's bike infrastructure plan: litm://www.mprnews.ore/storv/2014/10/08/bennepin-
county-bike-plan .
0 Supports
comment...
Reply to Chris Bremer
Joel Wow, C0111111 unity volunteer 18 days ago
Neighborhoods with high population densities, lots of seniors and lower income people with limited budgets need sidewalks more than lower
density, high income neighborhoods. Also, people who live within 4-5 blocks of shopping facilities should be able to safely walk to the store,
I Support
comment...
I Reply to Joel Stegner
Warn Is Moil at October 27, 2014 at 12:57pm CDT
I do not see 59th Street on the side walk plan. This is the main street going into Concord Elementary from Wooddale. There are more than 20
children who walk on this very busy street to and from school each day. This street has a lot of traffic with the school as well- with parents,
teachers and school buses rushing down this street, I'm sure driving faster than 30 mph. It also fits your criteria. I. Routes to School, 2. It would
prevent it history of accidents involving pedestrians (children!) walking along the roadway 3. a logical connection between destinations 4. Transit
stops are present (on wooddale). PLEASE CONSIDER A SIDEWALK ON 59th STREET. This is also the intersection where cross walks are for
Concord Children getting to school safely, crossing Concord on 59th.
I Support
comment...
comment...
City of Edina Page 3 of 5
Reply to tonya wIlhoit I
Chris Bremer al October 27, 2014 at I:53pin CDT
I would like the city to consider whether a particular stretch of sidewalk is the best use of funds in a particular location. I mu thinking about
Strachauer Park and the planned north-south sidewalk along the west edge of the park. It would not be a bad thing to have a sidewalk there,
necessarily, but that park desperately needs an upgraded park building that could serve functions beyond being a simple warming house. Our
neighborhood has no community gathering spaces of any kind - no churches, no coffeeshops, no school, nothing. A larger park building would
make a huge difference, If the money saved on a planned stretch of sidewalk there (which would lead to a freeway fence and be little-used) could
instead be applied by the city towards upgrading the park building, that would be a much better use of city funds and would help our neighborhood
a great deal.
I Support
Reply to Chris Bremer
Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman at October 27,2014 at 5:33pat CDT
I strongly second adding a sidewalk on 59th Street between Wooddale Ave. and Concord Elementary. The residential neighborhood in this area is
very dense and full of Concord children with I) no bus service and 2) no safe walking route to school. Anyone who observes 59th Street during to
"to" and "from" school time will immediately see the problem. 59th is TIE STREET that walkers use to get to school - it is the main, and direct
artery leading to Concord Elementary and the neighborhood funnels to this street as a sort of "safety in numbers" default. Countless families walk
this route to and from school, and sadly, share the pavement with speeding cars and buses rushing to and from Concord, as 59th is also the direct
route for vehicles between Wooddale and Concord. Making the pedestrian route worse, is all file overflow, on-street parking (on 59th) the
completely bottlenecks 59th at our kids most vulnerable time. With no sidewalks, and cars parked on both sides of the street, we literally walk
down the middle of the busy road, with the sunrise in the east making it hard for us to be seen, rushing buses, teachers, and parents. It's just a bad
situation.
A number of us have noted that a sidewalk looks planned for 60th street, which is fine, but 59th should be prioritized ahead of 60th. 59th is simply
THE commuter artery for cars, buses, and most importantly, pedestrians. It needs help. A sidewalk would connect a densely populated
neighborhood to 1) a public elementary school with no bus service in the neighborhood, 2) numerous public transportation stops, 3) sports fields,
community centers, voter locations. etc. It simply screams "sidewalk". Thank you!
0 Supports
comment...
I Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman I
Sign Up
l email address...
Participants
I Sign Up I
Icint
Mark K. Nolan
From: Arnold Bigbee <arnieb1@me.com >
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:51 AM
To: Mark K. Nolan
Subject: sidewalks
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Categories: Work
Mark, the "Post" option on SpeakUp Edina ends my comments if I begin a new paragraph. Thus this note for my
feedback on the sidewalk plan.
First, good job with a huge area and lots of people to satisfy.
My first thought is that we should overlay a map with transit routes so that there is a sidewalk providing access to each
bus stop in Edina.
In my neighborhood (Edinborough) there is no sidewalk on the west side of Edinborough Way between 76th St and MN
Drive. There is a bus stop at both ends of that street and large population office buildings and multi-family residential
housing on either side of that block.
The info that sidewalk will be added to the N side of W 77th St bet. France Av and Hwy 100 is great news - bus stops
there too.
The map shows a gap in the sidewalk on Edinborough Way just before it turns north. Sidewalk does exist there now.
Sidewalks needed as follows:
N side of 54th St bet. France and Xerxes.
W side of Xerxes bet. 66th St and Edinborough Way.
N side of 69th St bet. York and Xerxes.
We should add a sidewalk corridor to move pedestrians from Xerxes to York Ave at Hazelton Rd.
Generally, there are way too few sidewalks in the western portions of the realm.
Arnie
Sent from Arnie Bigbee's iPad2
Cell: 612 804 4660
arnieb1@me.corn
www.lega Ishielda ssociate.com/a bigbee
Small Business and Group Benefits Specialist
1
Mark K. Nolan
.n wre
From: Cary Teague
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:41 PM
To: Mark K. Nolan
Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
Categories: Work
Cary Teague, Community Development Director
952-826-0460 I Fax 952-826-0389 I Cell 952-826-0236
)t I 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424
cl i ciueC11 [dill at .g_ov www.EdinatvIN.gov/Planniiiq ,
...1.7or Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: Holtzman, Mary [mailto:Ma_yr .HoltzmanPljostens.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:32 PM
To: Cary Teague
Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
NO SIDEWALKS — I very much agree with Sue and Gary Soule.
Mary Holtzman
7228 West Shore Drive
Commission Members,
In regard to the Living Streets Sidewalk Plan, I oppose the change in designation of West Shore Drive
from local street to local connector and the consequent requirement of at least one sidewalk on our
street.
We have lived on West Shore for 26 years. During that time, we have seen abundant recreational use of
our street — walking, biking, roller-blading, scooters, etc., - by people of all ages. It is already a "living
street".
What we have not seen, or heard reported, is any instance of a car/pedestrian or car/bike accident
anywhere between 70th Street and Hibiscus.
If our side of the street were to be selected for a sidewalk, the minimum 5 foot boulevard and minimum
5 foot sidewalk would require the loss the two beautiful hardwood maples trees and two evergreens, all
over thirty years old. We would also have to move our irri /stem. All of these features were part
of what we paid for when purchasing our home, part of the value of our property.
"Living streets" should not equate with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to
the value of the property and the streetscape.
If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of
beauty and home value.
If traffic speed is a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all
we see is a solution without a problem.
Sincerely,
Sue and Gary Soule
7324 West Shore Drive
2
Mark K. Nolan
From: Cary Teague
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:31 AM
To: Mark K. Nolan
Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
Categories: Work
See below...
Cary Teague, Community Development Director
952-826-0460 I Fax 952-826-0389 I Cell 952-826-0236
4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424
cteacitieEdinaMtl.qoA!I www.EdinaMN.clov/Planning
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: Greg Holtzman [rnailto:greg.holtzman@ampf.com ]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:24 AM
To: Cary Teague
Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
Are you out of you freaking mind.
"Living streets" should not equate with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to the value of the
property and the streetscape.
If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of beauty and home
value.
If traffic speed is a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all we see is a
solution without a problem.
Wise up I And come over and walk this street with me
Greg A Holtzman
Portfolio Associate Managed Account Trading
0: 612.678.1941
Ameriprise Financial
2866 Ameriprise Financial Ctr. Routing
S6 /2866
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474
(15,0 I ,; YosiLio,(1p)
A tI,
(14;)
hp;
We shape financial
solutions for a lifethneo
1
From: Holtzman, Mary [mailto:Mary.Holtzman@jostens.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:32 PM
To: Holtzman, Greg; gregho9@comcast.net
Subject: FW: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
From: Graciejean [mailto:sjsmith126@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:07 PM
To: Sue Soule; Sue Johnson; nancy beegle; <betty.a.johnson@comcast.net>; Bey Moore; Lori J. Connelly; Geeta Dash;
Michele Azar; Holtzman, Mary; Elizabeth Freeman; Claudia P
Subject: Fwd: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
Tonight at 7:00 pm at City Hall
If I left someone out, please forwardill0
Susan Jean Smith
H- 952-926-6907
C- 612-600-5066
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Sue Soule" <su1b3soPcorncast.net>
Date: October 22, 2014 at 1:07:30 PM CDT
To: <cteague@EdinaMN.goy>
Cc: "Susan Jean Smith" <sismith126@comcast.net>
Subject: Planning Commission; Safe Sidewalks
Commission Members,
In regard to the Living Streets Sidewalk Plan, I oppose the change in designation of West Shore Drive
from local street to local connector and the consequent requirement of at least one sidewalk on our
street.
We have lived on West Shore for 26 years. During that time, we have seen abundant recreational use of
our street — walking, biking, roller-blading, scooters, etc., - by people of all ages. It is already a "living
street".
What we have not seen, or heard reported, is any instance of a car/pedestrian or car/bike accident
anywhere between 70th Street and Hibiscus.
If our side of the street were to be selected for a sidewalk, the minimum 5 foot boulevard and minimum
5 foot sidewalk would require the loss the two beautiful hardwood maples trees and two evergreens, all
over thirty years old. We would also have to move our irrigation system. All of these features were part
of what we paid for when purchasing our home, part of the value of our property.
"Living streets" should not equate with the removal of natural assets already in place, assets that add to
the value of the property and the streetscape.
If your goal is street safety, show us the statistics that support the expense, disruption and loss of
beauty and home value.
If traffic speed is a street safety issue, then enforce the speed limit and install speed bumps. So far, all
we see is a solution without a problem.
2
Sincerely,
Sue and Gary Soule
7324 West Shore Drive
****************************************************************************** ',This
message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the
information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message
and any attachments. Thank you."
******************************************************************************
3
Attention City Council Members
Attached, please find the recent petition regarding the neighborhood's
objection to the proposed sidewalk on Maddox Lane being submitted
for approval by the Edina Planning Commission for the November 3rd
City Council meeting.
Of the 17 households on Maddox Lane, 9/1 (1/0 (16 of 17 households) are
opposed to this plan. In brief, the following reasons are why we oppose
it.
1. Maddox Lane is only two blocks long. Currently, there is no other
sidewalk to which it would connect. The plan for a• sidewalk for
Valley View Road has been removed from the plan because (we
are told) that the residents opposed it,
2. The sidewalk would not create any logical connection between
destinations, We are located in a commuter neighborhood with
the only way to get to required destinations e.g. grocery stores,
gas stations, restaurants or schools is by driving.
3. We believe that the average daily traffic (vehicles) and the 85th%
speed (mph) cited in the.Criteria Matrix or th e plan does not
• reflect Maddox Lane hut because it was bundled with Valley View
• Road and Normandale Road, the statistics are significantly
exaggerated for our two block street, There are natural barriers
that reduce speed on Maddox Lane which makes it difficult to go
38mph as stated in the matrix. Also, there was no traffic
measuring devices installed. on Maddox Lane during this study.
4, Maddox Lane is not a street used by pedestrians to any extent as
no matter what block of Maddox Lane you live on, ifyou choose to
go for a walk, it: is only a half of a short block to reach a side street
that carries less traffic and connect to multiple streets one can
walk that are less traveled,
5. Most of the front yards on Maddox Lane are relatively shallow. A
sidewalk that would consume 10 feet of space would have an
adverse affect on the character and aesthetics of the
neighborhood,
6. There is no history of a single crash or incident on Maddox Lane
that has involved a pedestrian.
Name Address Do you favor adding
sidewalks to
Maddox Lane?
Do you think
adding sidewalks
to Maddox Lane
would enhance the
character of the
neighborhood?
Do you feel safe
walking and/or
biking on Maddox
Lane?
Signature Date
jir Y-k- atv`•A
/2,NeL (0.4L
5b75 IMAA6X 4.)
es No Don't car( No Nd Don't care Yes .i. Ci)Don't care
f•Art\CLL jo---/Li 1
$1 e7e w D ci
FIFIN. Eci
Yes (5) Don't care Yes(3)Don't care Ye No D on't care ..' ._._.1 D' I
1 -
i
ii‘i Pi LL y
NOW—NDE
5317 rn ADDox
LANE
Yes Don't care Yes qt) Don't care es No Dont care
14046/1kdac
i i 1 70-26-P f
.s.....,eriti l'iv/S 6::, 4R. /;2,-, WrAlAid Avg , Yes <E14' Don't care Yes Don't care -/a No Don't care
1
..,
...,,Malxj--ivn
_51q7.0 Meite-')d
„Ir./Vic
Yes Don't care Yes 415 Don't care ('-No Don't care
e '<_if ' /0-261
I
13>Y7 617) A - c 3Z9 Yeta Wik, Yes 0 Don't care
,
Ye Don't care
._.........,,,,.., ,,,,
Yes Don't care
,...--,
De.rvii$
JO:c.Kze-
C
(„2s., OsiyncLAn TA/1,0 e to -2(0-04
Name Address Do you favor adding
sidewalks to
Maddox Lane?
Do you think
adding sidewalks
to Maddox Lane
would enhance the
character of the
neighborhood?
Do you feel safe
walking and/or
biking on Maddox
Lane?
Signature z., Date
.
DeAvmA.e.,-Di joias
_
.6..-3,1, iikadd oc Yes No Don't care
x tl/L
Yes &Don't care 7e9ro Don't care
1
I
' c-Wa-cv 53/q Mad.°
Yes No Don't care
Y—e-SS\ Don't care
Yes0Don't care No Don't care
Yes 1,1"o Don't care ,411) No Don't care
I
.
1
.,.
i
1
i
1012514-
r---
Acilzs--Ie
sow&
1,1,9011_,
0212. v\himat jA
**/)\n .-Z Yes & Don't care 5.;,1-5-2_0, ikkaillc,../ i i,„„. Yes Don't care No Don't care
t.4.{,,,c.k.r))44,,,
(5'
es e Don't care Yes Don't care IS No Don't care , k
4 , ' S0.,21.04 jyt, )
6/1(i)kiktemk. r
9-424 il,liorati)e Lic,
iteA-q. Pli
' g§-2-E3G.
Yes 6k;\ Don't care Yes 114fol Don't care
yte iopp ,:„, INT
et No Don't care
/1/44 -i t 61 41
Name Address Do you favor adding
sidewalks to
Maddox Lane?
Do you think
adding sidewalks
to Maddox Lane
would enhance the
character of the
neighborhood?
Do you feel safe
walking and/or
biking on Maddox
Lane?
Signature z:, Date
-EA, --i ZS Y N on't care Ye No on't car Yes 1\lo Don't care 1 0 2
4L(
Yes 4aril Don't care
62-2 2, ikikcici 0.1 Yes Don't care No Don't care
,
'630n,VA
. ; n Ps,,t
"M.,
Yes , Don't care
--,
Yes * Don't care
,../
s.........-,No Don't care ,
i
Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care
Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care
Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care
..eStik-Citi;
7Th
Name Address Do you favor adding
sidewalks to
Maddox Lane?
Do you think
adding sidewalks
to Maddox Lane
would enhance the
character of the
neighborhood?
Do you feel safe
walking and/or
biking on Maddox
Lane?
Signature Date
74-alle__,D4:: 3-2ig mj96)0)4 Yes o Don't care
--.
Ye Don't care i es o Don't care i
i
„ • LI _..- 4., , ..__,,,,.z.X,-
Yes No Don't care Ye No Don't car
1---'‘
No Don't care -- tot/ty
Jcz-,-)
Lie f tArien
-.1-2 /4 Adc-idc-,'/'
/62-6..e._
Yes IN() Don't care Yes No Don't care Yes No Don't care
L2-44/4/80214-4
/61//4. 1,
2 -7 2- ,L"(14tDDP )6.
LA' Iv L7---
Yes)Don't care Yes e a on't care es Don't care
id Tr 10 N (
cr, _
cJQA-ck.
Cushman
5c tY),j
L-q rie.
Yes Don't care Yes Don't care (Ye7s.I.N2) Don't care 0
aqr 0 Aytox ,f.-3'2 2,5 Mc,
kAiru2._
j_4 —VIAL.'
Yes(-No' Don't care Yes Nd Don't care lfes No Don't care i
--e.'P'4 A-e--• /4-7./
J
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Date: November 20, 2014
Agenda Item #: VI. A.
Action E
Discussion El
Information MI
Subject: Former Public Works Site at Grandview - Redevelopment Plan Update
Action Requested:
None.
Information / Background:
Economic Development Manager Bill Nuendorf will give the ETC an update on the redevelopment plan for
the former Public Works Site in the Grandview District. Please see the attached flyer regarding the
following Exploration Session:
Former Public Works Site Exploration Session
7:00-9:00pm, Thursday, Dec. 4, 2014
Edina Community Center, Room 303
5701 Normandale Road
Attachments:
Former Public Works Site Exploration Session Flyer
G: \ PW \ CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Transportation Commission \ Agendas & RR's \ 2014 R&R \ 20141 120 \ Item VIA. Former Public Works Site at Grandview
Update.docx
City of Edina . 4801 W. 50th St. 'i Edina, MN 55424
LAN THE FUTURE-
OF THE FORMER
PUBLIC WORKS Slit
FRAUENSHUH
Commercial Real Estate Group
www.EdinaMN.gov/Grandview
Exploration Session
7-9 p.m. Thursday, Dec. 4, 2014
Edina Community Center, Room 303
5701 Normandale Road
We will renew the conversation for the future of this
vacant 3.3-acre site on Eden Avenue. Bring your ideas
and suggestions!
Save the Date!
Discovery Session 7-9 p.m. Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Open House 5:30-7:30 p.m. Wednesday, April 22, 201 5
iH 'lit, (11 Y1? 9\p \n ,/
, (.144, 4 V V ' I
' 1° .
I 11 .0 i!1 I; I lily 'c 1 III) I
J1 41 /D o
1
MINUTES OF
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
OCTOBER 23, 2014
6:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Campbell, Iyer, Janovy, Nelson, Olson, Rummel, Spanhake and Whited.
ABSENT Members Boettge and LaForce.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Spanhake to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to approve the minutes of September 18, 2014. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
COMMUNITY COMMENT - None.
REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Arden Park D Neighborhood Draft Engineering Report
City engineer Millner said the Arden Park D project was initiated by staff primarily due to needed utility repairs and this
made it a good fit to implement elements of Living Streets policy. He said on Aug. 19, the City Council removed the proposed
sidewalks from Juanita Ave and Indianola Ave based on feedback from residents and because they did not meet warrants.
Mr. Millner said Arden Park D would be coordinated with the W. 54th St. project and bid together to take advantage of
economies of scale. He turned over the presentation to Mr. Toby Muse, consulting engineer with SEH who is designing and
managing both the Arden Park D and W. 54th St. projects.
Mr. Muse described current conditions and stated that most streets are 30 ft. wide; ADT varies, for example, on Juanita it is
low, and high on Halifax; the 85th percentile speed is 25-32 mph with the highest speed on Halifax due to cut thru traffic
avoiding the 50th & France area; the only alley has three different type of materials (pavement/dirt/gravel), it is 10-12 ft.
wide and Public Works perform maintenance at least three times annually; and all but three streetlights are owned by Xcel
Energy.
Mr. Muse said proposed improvements include new pavement and curb and gutter; elements of Living Streets such as
reducing streets width to 24 ft. with one parking lane, and boulevard-style sidewalks. He said the sidewalk layout proposed
by staff was redesigned based on existing tree locations and feedback from residents and is now proposed to be 4 ft. with a 3
ft. boulevard. He said sidewalks will be on Arden (east side), 52nd St. (south side), Minnehaha Blvd (west side) and a small
section by the church on Indianola. The Minnehaha Blvd sidewalk will be 8 ft. because it is next to the park and is expected to
have more users. Streets without sidewalks will be 26 ft. wide except for Minnehaha Blvd which will be 27 ft. wide to
accommodate future parking demands if needed. Crosswalks will be striped at 52nd & Halifax and also on Minnehaha Blvd.
The intersection at 51st & Halifax will have a 6 ft. island to help reduce traffic speeds; the island at Bruce Ave & Bruce Pl will
increase in size; and the cul-de-sacs at Bruce Ave and Gorgas Ave will be reduced. The gravel section of the alley will be
paved. New streetlights will be added and residents will be surveyed to see which of the four lighting styles they prefer.
Mr. Millner said two informational meetings were held for residents and input was also sought from the Park Board, Police,
Fire, and Public Works.
2
Discussion
Member Janovy said the 4 ft. sidewalk does not match the change being made to the Comprehensive Plan and Living Streets.
Mr. Millner explained that the change was made because residents felt the 5 ft. design did not fit the character of the
neighborhood and existing sidewalks in the neighborhood are 4 ft. wide. She suggested a 5 ft. sidewalk with a 2 ft. boulevard
like she’s seen in other places. She asked if there was any concern from the school district with the median because she
thought they were concerned with the ones in the Cornelia neighborhood. Mr. Millner said feedback was not sought from
the school district but he would contact the transportation supervisor. She asked if the crosswalks meet the crosswalk policy
and he said he did not look at pedestrian counts but they should with the many park users.
Member Olson asked about replacement of the entire curb and gutter and Mr. Millner explained that because the project is
driven by utility repairs all existing curb and gutter would have to be removed and replaced.
Chair Bass asked if the island would be planted with flowers and Mr. Millner said he’s not sure because the island is unique in
that it was installed at the request of a resident and is maintained by the resident.
Member Nelson asked what the Park Board’s feedback was and Mr. Millner said they are in favor of the 8 ft. sidewalk along
the park. Mr. Millner will check to see if it is possible to design the median at 51st & Halifax to have a crossing refuge;
however, he does not believe it is necessary because of the width of the street.
Member Spanhake asked if there were any major concerns from residents and Mr. Millner said yes, they were not in favor of
the sidewalks on Juanita and Indianola, concerned with loss of parking, and still some not in favor of sidewalks anywhere.
Member Janovy asked about the width of the travel lanes at the median and Mr. Millner said they are 14 ft. wide. She said
there were concerns with the ones in the Cornelia neighborhood that the space was reduced when there was snow, cars and
bikes. Member Olson said he likes them because they force bikes to be car-like and cars slow down because of them. She
asked if the PACS fund pays for streetlights and planner Nolan said it pays for pedestrian safety lights not decorative
streetlights.
Regarding curb and gutter, member Janovy said she is concerned with the inconsistency of curb and gutter replacement. Mr.
Millner explained that the storm sewer fund would be quickly depleted if they were to automatically replace all curb and
gutter. She said the Living Streets policy was written to include exceptions so this may require bigger discussion. She said
there are different ways to look at the costs. She said this keeps coming up as an issue that different neighborhoods are
treated differently. She said it reduces the meaning of the Living Streets policy.
Chair Bass said she understood the frustration of not applying the policy uniformly but they must also be pragmatic about
infrastructure improvements and there will be some inconsistencies because of this. She said the City Council has to weigh all
desires and options and be fiscally conservative at the same time. Member Janovy said they haven’t seen a comparison of
what the cost is to residents who are assessed for an additional 6 ft. of pavement and maintenance over 50 years. She said
there are different ways to approach this challenge.
Member Iyer said he agreed with member Janovy’s global point on curb and gutter replacement. He said there should be
consistency.
Mr. Millner said most streets are 27 ft. and they are not putting in any new streets that are 30 ft. if the curb and gutter are
taken out.
Chair Bass said she visited the neighborhood and it was teaming with pedestrians, joggers and park users so she was pleased
to see that sidewalks were proposed.
3
2015 Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Draft Engineering Reports
Planner Nolan said last month assistant city engineer Wrase presented the 2015 projects and tonight he would take feedback
to bring back to staff.
Discussion – Countryside H
Chair Bass asked if the school district commented on the sidewalk. Planner Nolan said both Millner and Wrase has been
meeting with the school district and has a verbal agreement for an easement for the sidewalk and they’re also talking about
an ADA compliant access where the steps are in exchange for the sidewalk that was going to go in on the Benton Ave side.
Member Olson asked what would be the additional cost for replacing the entire curb and gutter if residents were willing to
pay for it instead of replacing sections and having it look like patchwork.
Member Janovy noted that the streets width is 30 ft. and they are choosing to leave the curb and not reduce the streets to
27 ft. She said this is inconsistent. Planner Nolan said this is a cost issue and how much of the utility fund they would be able
to use or is willing to put towards curb and gutter. He said further that there probably should be language in the Living
Streets plan to address exceptions like this and that the policy talks about being sensitive to context and one may be fiscal
context.
Member Janovy asked if lighting was reviewed for the sidewalk. Additionally, member Spanhake said it looks like a couple
places could be very dark and ask how the decision is made to add streetlights.
Discussion – Prospect Knolls B
Member Spanhake said it was noted on the questionnaire that people run the stop signs at Gleason & Schey and asked if this
was the intersection they discussed last month and decided that a broader discussion on traffic calming was needed. Chair
Bass said yes, but Gleason is not a part of this project. At the same intersection, Chair Bass said in the questionnaire, a
resident requested a wheelchair ramp and asked if there was a curb ramp there now. Planner Nolan does not believe there is
one now but said staff is working on an ADA compliant policy that would address this and he would see if this could be fit in
with the project.
Under proposed improvements – sidewalks, Member Janovy suggested deleting the current language and replace or add this
to it - ‘Sidewalks are not shown on the approved sidewalk map.’ The suggestion is the same for Dewey Hill G.
Discussion - Dewey Hill G – see above.
2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Projects
Planner Nolan said $600,000 is rolling over from 2014 for a total of $1.7m for 2015 projects. He said most of the projects
listed are in neighborhood roadway reconstruction project areas.
Discussion
Member Janovy asked if Cornelia Drive (66th to 70th) sidewalk could be added and planner Nolan said it could be considered.
Member Iyer said the pedestrian/bike bridge over Hwy. 62 should be added too. Planner Nolan agreed but said the cost is
$2-3m and this will require partnering with an agency like MNDOT. Chair Bass said it was included in the ARTS plan and
having it there would also help with funding. Planner Nolan said staff is researching ways to make it safe on Valley View Rd
under Hwy. 62.
Member Whited asked about Xerxes between 56th & 60th and planner Nolan said it is high on the priority list but it is also
expensive. He said he applied for funding from Hennepin County but was not successful.
Member Iyer said Valley View & France (69th) has a missing link of sidewalk.
4
Chair Bass asked how would staff evaluate what gets funded with the miscellaneous funds and planner Nolan said they will
look at what gives the biggest bang for the buck including is the preliminary design done, etc.
Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 1, 2014
A2. Member Iyer believes this is a school bus stop and said the same could apply to all the other intersection nearby. He said
a sidewalk on the other side of the street would be most helpful.
A3. Member Whited asked if it was typical to cite old data, 2005 in this case. Planner Nolan said it is typically based on staff’s
availability to collect the data and the most recent data was 2005 which seemed justifiable.
B2. Traffic increase was because of the closure of TH-169.
B3. Member Janovy noted warrant was not met and asked how it could when it is an unsafe crossing. She suggested that
they consider context also. Planner Nolan said they had a similar situation where warrant was under by one but they
decided to install crosswalks because it was next to a park. Member Whited added that the sidewalk is not very wide, has
lose gravel and tilts to the side making you feel like you are going to slide into traffic.
D4. Police is investigating said Planner Nolan.
Member Olson asked what was the cost of the flashing rapid beacons and planner Nolan said between $3,000-$5,000.
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to forward the Oct. 1, 2014, report to the City
Council.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Updates
Student Members
Member Rummel asked about the intersection at Benton and Tracy because drivers seem to be confused and asked if signs
would help. Member Nelson said there was a proposal to make it into a roundabout not too long but they decided to leave it
as is because it forced drivers to stop and figure out what they should be doing where the roundabout near a school would
allow free flowing traffic while pedestrians were crossing. Chair Bass clarified that it was not because they felt roundabouts
are unsafe but in addition, this one would have been large and required a significant amount of private land.
Bike Edina Working Group – None.
Living Streets Working Group – None.
Communications Committee – None.
CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
Members were invited to participate in Vision Edina and to consider hosting a meeting for groups of 10 or more.
CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Member Nelson requested again that 66th Street down to Ridgeview Drive, west of TH-100, be considered for a sidewalk
because it is active with pedestrians and next to a park. He also requested a crosswalk from the Brookview Heights
neighborhood to Normandale Park. Additionally, member Nelson said an Olinger Road resident wanted to know if there was
any flexibility in the placement of signs because currently, he has a hydrant, utility box and a stop sign in his yard, and
recently, a bike sign was added. Planner Nolan said there are some restrictions on placement of signs but he would check
with staff.
5
Member Whited reported that a traffic signal at 58th & France looks like it is going to fall. This will be reported.
Following up on member Nelson’s request for a crosswalk to Normandale Park, member Iyer said he thought an exception
was made for adding crosswalks to access parks even if warrants were not met. Planner Nolan said they do not have a policy
that states this but instead rely on engineering judgment.
Chair Bass said she has been following the conversation about sidewalks on Speak Up Edina and asked how staff was taking
suggestions into account. Planner Nolan said staff is listening and will take into account criteria for sidewalk on each street.
Chair Bass said a resident talked about the lack of sidewalk on Valley View Road where the 2015 Birchcrest project will end
and asked when the next phase would be completed. Planner Nolan said it is at least more than five years out. Additionally,
chair Bass said they’re talked about right-of-ways and how to educate residents about what they can or cannot do within the
right-of-way. Planner Nolan suggested working on this over the winter.
Member Olson asked if the City has ever asked private companies to consider infrastructure improvements such as sidewalks
that abut their property while doing their property improvements and he mentioned Fairview Hospital as an example that is
currently under construction and there is a missing link of sidewalk along their property on France Ave. Planner Nolan said he
was not aware if the City had ever made such a request. Chair Bass noted that businesses also pay into the PACS Fund that
pays for sidewalks and asked if it is on the plan. Planner Nolan said it is included and added that staff is in discussion with
MNDOT and Hennepin County about improving the area of France Ave and TH-62 when the bridge is redecked in 2-3 years
and the improvements could extend down to the sidewalk.
Member Janovy said there is a City code that can require businesses to provide sidewalks. She reported that a resident on
Olinger Road mentioned to her that there is overgrown vegetation; this will be reported to the appropriate staff. She said
also that she noticed a roundabout listed in the CIP for Valley View Lane and Tracy Avenue that the ETC has not discussed. In
reference to a comment on Speak Up Edina about the Sidewalk Facilities Plan, she asked if the City could use utility easement
for transportation; planner Nolan will check with the attorney.
Member Campbell said there is a lot of speeding on 66th Street late at nights and drivers often miss the crosswalk. Planner
Nolan said this will be reported to the police for enforcement and added that recently, push button lights were installed at
two locations on 66th Street to draw attention to the crosswalks.
STAFF COMMENTS
• Valley View Road project was approved by City Council as recommended by staff;
• Sidewalk Facilities Plan was approved by Planning Commission and forwarded to City Council for a public hearing on
Nov. 3;
• Neighborhood roadway reconstruction projects are completed except for Morningside B;
• France Avenue Corridor Pedestrian Improvements – little striping to be completed; light poles to be installed in Dec.;
staff and member Janovy met onsite with Hennepin County staff regarding painting traffic signals and they said they
were out of funding; City staff will continue the conversation with Hennepin County staff;
• 2014 Sidewalk Improvements – all three sidewalks are completed; finishing up the retaining wall on Valley View
Road;
• Olinger Blvd mill and overlay is almost completed;
• Xerxes Avenue at TH-62 – the Mayor has been receiving feedback from residents in the Chowen Park and Strachauer
Park neighborhoods and he plans to meet with Hennepin County to discuss the possibility of aesthetic improvements
to the new bumpouts;
ETC meeting schedule – Planner Nolan explained that the ETC has consistently changed their meeting date in October from
the 3rd to the 4th Thursday because of the MEA holiday and suggested that they consider making this a permanent change.
Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Janovy to permanently change their October meeting
6
date to the 4th Thursday, as long it does not conflict with a religious holiday.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned.
ATTENDANCE
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE - 2014
NAME TERM J F* M A M J J A S O N D SM
2/27
SM
3/10
WS
3/18
# of
Mtgs Attendance %
Meetings/Work
Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 11
Bass, Katherine 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 82%
Boettge, Emily 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91%
Campbell, Jack student 1 1 2 18%
Iyer, Surya 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 82%
Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100%
LaForce, Tom 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91%
Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91%
Olson, Larry 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 100%
Rummel, Anna student 1 1 2 18%
Sierks, Caroline student 1 1 1 3 27%
Spanhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 78%
Van Dyke, Jackson student 1 1 2 18%
Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 82%
*Cancelled due to weather
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Allison, Secretary
Walk Edina
Recommendation
To: ETC
RE: Recommendation to appoint new members
Date: November 20, 2014
Background
Residents interested in participating in the new Working Group, Walk Edina,
completed and submitted an application and were interviewed by phone before
being recommended for appointment. Appointments will be approved by the ETC.
Approval of Members:
• Christine Bremer—“I love to walk and have been pleased to see progress in
Edina’s walkability”.
• Annette Gaughan—“Walking is my primary form of exercise. I would like to
see more sidewalks in Edina which would make walking in Edina safer for
children and adults”.
• Lisa Strauss—“I focused in Recreation Resources in graduate school . . . I’m a
regular runner, so having safe roads and paths on which to run in my
community is of great personal importance to me”.
• Marie Pechman—“Walking in Edina is very important to me. I grew up here
in Edina, and have been walking in the neighborhoods for over 35 years”.
• Marcia Friedman—“As an avid walker, I feel that I would be able to
contribute to pedestrian safety issues”.
Approval of Student Members:
• Matthew Jensen—“I would like to make it easier to get around without
people worrying about traffic”.
• Aanik Lohani—“To have a healthy community we need to encourage its
members to exercise and what better way than to take a walk in the
neighborhood”.
• Annika Beringer—“I think it is important that people are able to walk around
Edina easily. I bring my prior knowledge of Edina and my fiery passion about
being able to walk where I want to go”.
CITY OF EDINA
MEMO
Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371
Fax 952-826-0392 o www.CityofEdina.com
Date: November 20, 2014
To: Edina Transportation Commission
From: Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner
Re: Summary of Sidewalk Facilities Map Quadrant Input Meetings
Below are brief summaries of the four meetings held (one for each quadrant of the City) this week to share
information and obtain feedback regarding the Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Attached are more detailed notes regarding individual comments received during the meetings. These notes —
along with copies of all correspondence received from residents regarding this item — will be included in the City
Council packet for their Dec. 2 meeting.
Northwest Edina — 6-8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Senior Center
Approximately 50 people attended the Northwest Quadrant meeting, and 35 comment sheets were received.
Elected/appointed officials included Mayor Hovland, who arrived at 7:30 as the formal portion of the meeting was
ending. The Mayor stayed until the last attendee left, which was just after 8:00. Staff gave a presentation, which
started just after 6:00. The presentation was meant to be brief; however, many questions were asked and
discussions held during the presentation. As a result, the presentation concluded after 7:00. Most in attendance
(approximately 80-90%) were opposed to the Sidewalk Facilities Map and/or sidewalks being installed on their
streets. The majority of those in opposition live in the Highlands Neighborhood. A minority of attendees (five or
six) did voice their support for the Map and what the City is attempting to accomplish.
Significant themes from the Northwest Quadrant meeting were:
• Many felt that a citywide survey/questionnaire should have gone out to all households in the City,
asking about their preferences for sidewalks.
• Resident responsibility (and burden) for snow removal was a major theme (especially for the elderly)
• Some expressed doubt that the data used for some of the criteria was appropriate (e.g. vehicle counts
and speeds) and thought sidewalks should go only where pedestrians currently are.
• Some thought that traffic calming and enforcement should be increased to increase the safety of
pedestrians on the roadway, instead of constructing sidewalks.
• A few vocal attendees expressed disappointment that City Council seemed to be "cramming" this in
against the wishes of residents, or at the very least without their input
• There was doubt among some that the PACS Fund covers all of the costs, and that sidewalk installation
will have no effect on their (rising) property taxes.
• Several attendees expressed that they have nothing against sidewalks, just in this location.
Southwest Edina — 6-8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 17, Edina Public Works
The Southwest Quadrant meeting was attended by nearly 20 people (eight comment sheets were received),
including Councilmennber Mary Brindle and ETC Chair Katherine Bass. At the conclusion of a brief presentation a
group discussion was held with all of the attendees. Most in attendance were supportive of the Sidewalk Facilities
Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439
CITY OF EDINA MEMO
Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371
Fax 952-826-0392 www.CityofEdina.com
bre,
Map. There were some in attendance who spoke against the overall plan and expressed concerns regarding some
of the details of the plan.
Significant themes from the Southwest Quadrant meeting were:
• There was a sentiment that southwest Edina does not have a enough sidewalks when compared to the
other quadrants of the city and that additional routes should be added.
• Some felt that there needs to be an implementation schedule developed for the sidewalks, and the
segment of Valley View Rd from Mark Terrace to Gleason Rd needs to be added as soon as possible.
• Lighting needs to be examined with each of the sidewalks projects to ensure pedestrian safety.
• Since the City is initiating the sidewalk map update, it should also conduct the snow removal on all
walks, not just State Aid and school/park routes.
Northeast Edina — 6-8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 19, Edina City Hall
The Northeast Quadrant meeting was attended by 20 people. The attendees included ETC Member Jennifer
Janovy. Questions were answered during the presentation, which concluded at approximately 6:45. A question
and answer session was then held, with limited dialogue between the attendees. It is estimated that support for
the Sidewalk Facilities Map was approximately 50% upon arrival; however, support seemed to increase as the
meeting progressed. The last of the attendees departed at approximately 8:15 and left 13 comment sheets.
The most significant themes from the Northeast Quadrant meeting were:
• There was concern about the impact of narrowing the street and the effect on commercial vehicle traffic
and snow.
• It was mentioned that other existing sidewalks such those on France Ave just north of Hwy 62 are in
rough shape and that existing facilities should be maintained before building any additional sidewalks.
• There was concern by some related to sidewalk snow removal and the need for clear communication
about the responsibilities of homeowners.
• Attendees seemed to grasp how the impact of street reconstruction with narrow streets and sidewalks
was minor on existing boulevards.
• There was much concern over the upcoming project to construct sidewalk in Arden Park (on-th&west
side of Minnehaha Blvd) and potential removal of mature trees.
• Attendees again mentioned the need to know the implementation schedule.
Southeast Edina — 6-8 p.m. Monday, Nov. 19, Edina Public Works
Nearly 40 residents attended the Southeast Quadrant meeting, and submitted 18 comment sheets. Overall,
support and opposition seemed relatively balanced, with the vast majority of opposition coming from residents
who live on West Shore Drive (primary south of W. 70th St). After the initial 20-minute presentation concluded,
questions were asked and answered for a period of approximately one hour, at which time some residents left and
others stayed to continue discussion. ETC members Emily Boettge and Larry Olson were in attendance, and were
joined by Mayor Hovland and Councilmember Elect Kevin Staunton later in the meeting.
Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439
CITY OF EDINA MEMO
Engineering Department Phone 952-826-0371
Fax 952-826-0392 o www.CityofEdina.com
Significant themes from the Southeast Quadrant meeting were:
• Many residents of West Shore Drive were opposed to a sidewalk on their street. They cited past surveys
and the removal of the sidewalk from the reconstruction project in 2009.
• Residents potentially having to maintain (especially plow snow from) sidewalks was a significant issue.
Relatedly, there was concern that if Public Works has to maintain all sidewalks, then property taxes
would increase to pay for this.
• Some attendees questioned the need for a boulevard, and wanted any sidewalks to be constructed at
the back of curb.
• Some expressed a desire for more east-west sidewalk routes in the Lake and South Cornelia
neighborhoods.
• Some felt that individual surveys should be sent to every household to clearly ask their opinions about
sidewalks, and how their survey answers would affect City policy.
Attachments:
• Comment summary for the Northwest Quadrant Input Meeting
• Comment summary for the Southwest Quadrant Input Meeting
• Comment summary for the Northeast Quadrant Input Meeting
• Comment summary for the Southeast Quadrant Input Meeting
G:\ PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Non-Motorized Transportation \Sidewalk Facilities Map\ Input Mtgs_Nov 17_19\ ETC Memo_Sidewalk Facilities Map Quadrant
Meetings Summary.docx
Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439
'CITY OF_EDINA
MEMO
trS
0 E-^
Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371
Fax 952-826-0392 . www.CityofEdina.com
Engineering Department 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439
Sidewalks Facilities Map
Edina Northwest Quadrant Meeting
Resident questions and comments
Senior Center, Nov. 17, 2014
1. Was a questionnaire done soliciting feedback when the 1999 Comp Plan was revised, but none for
this update? Staff did not know if one was done for the 1999 Comp Plan, but one was not done for
this update.
2. Because maintenance of sidewalks will fall only on those residents on the side of street where the
sidewalk is, it will be a disproportionate cost to them; sidewalks are typically 4-5 ft. wide; what
happens if he shovels only a small section in the middle? Believe the code is to shovel edge to edge.
3. On corner property and snowplow pushes snow after already shoveled; staff noted boulevard-style
sidewalk will help to keep snow at bay; mentioned the amount of snowfall last year; staff noted
that they are looking at what the cost would be to have Public Works staff do maintenance.
4. When will the sidewalk go in on Maddox Lane? Staff said when the road is scheduled for
reconstruction and residents would be notified at least two years in advance; on Valley View Roads,
snowplow throws snow at least 10 ft.
5. Hard to give input when they do not know who is going to maintain sidewalk. Staff noted that prior
to installation each sidewalk would have its own public hearing for more input.
6. Surveyed his neighbors and 90% do not want sidewalk; lived here 51 years and only one minor
accident; guarantee more accidents with pedestrians and bikers on sidewalk; disappointed because
they went through this in Highlands; what part of 90% don't you understand? City Council voted for
neighborhood to not have sidewalk and it is on the map again; staff noted that they look at
different criteria — connection to parks, schools, etc. and they should not preclude planning for it
20-30 years out because current residents are not in favor.
7. Regarding Maddox Lane, would a petition against sidewalk have any effect? Yes, said staff;
however, vehicle count is at least 1,500.
8. On Glengarry, lout of 10 is in favor of sidewalk and this should carry a lot of weight; slow down the
cars — this is the biggest safety issue.
9. On Arden Ave, putting in sidewalk, narrowing street, limiting parking to one side — this is going
backwards; doing this for less impervious surface said staff.
10. How are you working with the neighborhood associations? Staff said they were notified (recognized
associations) plus Next Door.
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting
11. No notice or mailing received on Maddox Lane; should have done mailings; staff noted mailing cost
would have been substantial.
12. Sidewalks are a safety issue? Yes said staff. Look at railroad derailment instead because she lives
close to the railroad and derailment are becoming frequent; also look at bus services and lack of
access to light rail; don't understand priority.
13. How many times has the City Council reverse its decision because residents did not want sidewalk?
Staff said at least a couple times since he's been with the City. Do the comments tonight hold the
same weight as Speak Up, Edina!? Yes said staff.
14. What is most effective way to get their message across? Staff said tonight's meeting; email/attend
City Council and ETC meetings.
15. Example of Highlands Neighborhood where they petitioned the City Council and had 93% signed
petition and City Council listened and did not approve the sidewalk; need to become involved and
attend council meetings; upset to see it still on plan for 20-30 years; people still will not want it.
16. Adopted park on Glengarry Pkwy; there are neighborhood associations that are recognized by the
City; recommended that residents organized their association and use this as their vehicle.
17. Didn't have sidewalk back then and Council did not push things; have to be organized now
otherwise they miss what Council is doing; all the work being done before first asking; cramming
things down their throats; lived without Living Streets.
18. Valley View Rd sidewalk residents petitioned the Council and it was not approved and now it is back
on the map; how many knows how streets are rated? You need to learn; not criteria met on his
street; put in because of volume and speed so he asked for data; made a deal for crosswalk instead
of sidewalk; crash data is not on Valley View; traffic correlates with church events; the devil is in the
detail; statistic shows best way to get kids to school is by school bus, followed by parents driving
them; sidewalks and walking are most dangerous.
19. What is the meaning of 85th percentile? 85% of vehicles are driving at the posted speed limit and
15% above.
20. Her neighborhood does not have `destination;' there are no pedestrians walking; why not build in
high density/commercial areas; why do you keep going back to neighborhoods where they don't
want sidewalk; give the Speak Up, Edina! people their sidewalk.
21. How do you count pedestrians? Staff said cameras are used but not all streets are counted; why
build sidewalks if you know there aren't any pedestrians? Staff said pedestrian data not gathered in
all cases but vehicle data is available.
2
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting
22. Story about a pedestrian crossing at the library mid-block (jaywalking) and swore at driver like the
driver was doing something wrong; there was a time when pedestrians were to be aware of
vehicles and now it's the drivers who has to be aware of pedestrians; need to educate pedestrians
as well; staff said Living Streets has an educational component.
23. Disappointed that City Council was not in attendance; staff was sent into the lions' den; remember
this when you vote next time because they are shoving this down our throats.
24. Understood that City Council is seeking input but the presentation sounds like a sales pitch with
perfectly placed family in photo; don't ignore the bigger picture; staff said the presentation was
meant to show how they developed the map.
25. Why isn't the City Council in attendance?
26. What is the timeline for installation? Staff said installation would be with road reconstruction most
often.
27. Send survey to entire city so that you gather information all at once; seem splintered now; staff
noted Quality of Life survey data and a survey done by Park & Recreation where respondents were
favorable towards pedestrian network improvements.
28. Lived here since 2009 and have not seen any of these surveys; how are your voices heard if you do
not know about these surveys? Staff said residents are randomly picked.
29. Commutes by bike and prefer to ride on street to avoid the up/down of sidewalks; concerned that
narrowing of roads will make it difficult; have you considered painting bike lanes? Staff said yes and
streets with bike lanes would not be narrowed to the same degree as other streets.
30. 101/2 year resident; Highlands is a unique neighborhood; City Council visited when their streets were
to be reconstructed and saw how residents live, greeting each other; streets are wide but not in
favor of sidewalk; do traffic calming.
31. People losing sight that this is a 20-30 year plan; recognize that you live in the city, not the country;
traffic volume is up; lives in the Highlands neighborhood and is in favor of sidewalk because of
livability and bringing neighbors together.
32. Why not have the neighborhood associations solicit this information?
33. Seem like a rush to judgment; not everyone is getting involved; surveys done are not scientific;
need representative number; non-computer users are left out; seem like world is going to end if
right decision isn't made in Dec.; many retired folks whose voices are not being heard; he is not
anti-sidewalk but they should go where they fit; no one knew PACS fund was being considered, just
happened; staff said the Dec. decision is for staff to be able to construct sidewalks with 2015
roadway projects.
3
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting
34. In 20-30 years neighborhood will still be the same ( Maddox La) — no destination; what will change?
Walking to grocery store 1.5 mile away? If doing this would take a direct route instead of where
cars go.
35. Would you work with homeowners to regrade driveways and would it be at their expense? Yes, but
it would not be homeowners expense.
36. How do you treat trees and landscaping? Work around trees or look at side of street with less
impacts, said staff;
37. How about utility poles? Work around them or they can be moved said staff.
38. Have not talked about cost; just received notice today that property tax increase 8.9%; unnecessary
things being done; City Council seem to think residents' money is theirs for frivolous things; uses
Vernon Ave sidewalk to Jerry's but do not want frivolous things; and now spending $100,000 to
study lid over TH-100; not in touch with reality.
39. Do not insult us that sidewalks are free because everyone pays one way or another and now you're
promising to maintain; be open and honest about cost.
40. Living Streets is to limit impervious surfaces but you're laying done sidewalk; goes against your goal.
41. Has anyone studied demographics and decline in 25 years? Will be a ghost town of elderly and no
replacement of generation, e.g. of Greece, Japan; most of Edina is over 65 years old; staff said the
Met Council is looking into this.
42. There are 80 million millennials to buy houses and they want sidewalks; runs at 5:30 a.m. and
prefer to run on sidewalk; lives on West Shore where most do not want sidewalk; stopped riding
her bike after moving to Edina; has three boys and would like them ride their bike.
43. People look at their budget and then pick a neighborhood based on what they want to do, e.g. if
you want to walk to shopping you pick Country Club; people want to preserve their choice of
neighborhood.
44. Need $1.5m to live in Country Club; most young people move here because of the school district.
45. A vote was called by a raise of hands — majority opposed; about 6 were in favor (42 residents signed
in).
46. What is the life expectancy of sidewalk? Staff said about 50 years.
47. People are often in favor of sidewalk as long as it is not their street or their side of the street; could
affect people's livability by changing ambiance/feel of neighborhood and cause people to move.
4
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northwest Quadrant Meeting
48. People do not want to look a piece of concrete all day or shovel; could be expensive and taxes are
rising on people with fixed income.
49. Thanked staff for the work; there are different perspective and respect opinions; is a single mother
with two kids; runs on sidewalk on Vernon Ave but is not in favor of neighborhood sidewalks; plan
does not seem thought thru; could not do this in her business; putting sidewalks where not
necessary, no destination; happy to have taxes go to where being used properly but do not see
value in this plan; places burden on younger families as well; in favor of sidewalk in certain place.
50. Mayor Hovland arrived and they called for a vote again to demonstrate to him that most were not
in favor of sidewalks.
5
Sidewalks Facilities Map
Edina Southwest Quadrant Meeting
Resident questions and comments
Public Works, Nov. 17, 2014
1. Questioning validity of new walk at south side Valley View between Gleason and Antrim since
walk exists on the north side.
2. Will this Power Point be on the city's website?
3. Why are some "500 cars per day" streets not on the plan?
4. What is the time frame for future St Aid walks on plan?
5. Would like a walk on 78th St.
6. Notice a higher concentration of walks in the NE. Is this policy trying to even it up?
7. Are Active Routes to School a Priority?
8. Valley View Rd SW of Gleason. Dark and dangerous. Feel unsafe walking, jogging. Could it be a
higher priority?
9. Lived here for 55 years and were told there would be no walks. Why do we need them? Are
residents aware?
10. Highland resident in favor, would like Red upgraded to Blue. Neighbors support but concerned
about trees. 2008 project was different time. Will there be new surveys? (told they can
petition)
11. Does the current council vote on this or the newly elected council. New
12. Which side is the walk on for the new Valley View Rd Hairpin project?
13. When do you decide which side to put a walk on, how long does it take to decide?
14. Missing links elevate priority of a segment. M Brindle
15. Walk by High School... Counts on peds? Were students surveyed? Who maintains?
16. The system will give choice for safer walking environment and parents were asked.
17. What do you do about people who don't want walks?
18. Previous policy served motorists. We need to catch up for peds/bikes.
19. It is not fair to ask residents to clear walks. Since city clears streets they should do walks.
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southwest Quadrant Meeting
20. Does Public Works have priorities for clearing walks?
21. 0.7 bus policy for areas with no walks i.e. Indian Hills area, should connect.
22. Will 9 mile trail eliminate soccer fields? No. Will Nordic Cir parking lot be expanded/used for
trail access? No
23. Is lighting considered for new walks? Will PACS cover cost?
24. Resident voicing support asked if it will be implemented.
25. Would like walk on 66th St west of Hwy 100. Very dark.
26. Lived in many cities, loved walking, would like more safe access to nearby parks, stores and
restaurants.
27. Prefers privacy. Does not want walks on lot.
28. Prefers the safety of walks. Totally supports.
29. If street is rebuilt, the walk would not be as close.
Sidewalks Facilities Map
Edina Northeast Quadrant Meeting
Resident questions and comments
City Hall, Nov. 19, 2014
1. Concerned about tree impacts.
2. What is the average ROW width?
3. Halifax was assessed for sidewalk a few years ago. Was assessment policy changed? Can
city refund?
4. What is the plan for bicycles on a 24' wide street design?
5. What are the criteria for narrowing streets?
6. What is the life cycle of a road?
7. How were the 27' & 24' street widths chosen?
8. Is safety the primary reason for adding sidewalks?
9. What % does the State pay for State Aid routes?
10. Are State Aid routes dependent on State schedule?
11. Is there dedicated money for State Aid walks specifically?
12. If State Aid funds run out how are walks paid for?
13. Most of the walks on the plan make sense because of high traffic but I question the walk
on Beard Ave.
14. We have always been fine walking in the road to Strachauer Park.
15. Explain the difference between Arterial and Collector streets.
16. Is there anything in the plan addressing speeding? Will design slow traffic?
17. Against narrowing streets because it is already congested especially when there are
garbage trucks.
18. What is the minimum width for a parking lane?
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northeast Quadrant Meeting
19. If there is no walk planned will parking be allowed on both sides of the street and will
roads be narrowed?
20. Comment to group to be proactive to council before decisions are made.
21. Narrow roads will hurt property values.
22. Does 60th & York reconstruction project area have plans for walk?
23. If a walk is not on plan and is petitioned will there be an assessment?
24. Would like example photos of new walks posted on line. Include meandering walks that
avoid conflicts.
25. Walk on France between 54th & Hwy 62 is in poor shape. Concerned that if city can't
maintain they shouldn't add one across the street. Resident does want walks, just wants
them maintained. Uses alternate routes to avoid bad sidewalk.
26. What is city position on maintaining all walks?
27. If another resident is not clearing their walk what is the procedure to enforce?
28. Concerned that Xerxes walk was not updated with new road construction last summer.
29. The 50th & France business district pays for walk maintenance. Would like the new walk
on Halifax to be included.
30. The new walk on Halifax is a very poor product, worst new walk ever seen.
31. When new walks are imminent will residents be included in design process?
32. Would like clarification on policy. Are all walks to parks definite? Even if road is local with
low traffic?
33. Another comment to talk to council about your preferences.
34. Comment that the Beard Ave walk was resident driven initially.
35. What is timeline for 60th by Parnell Ave?
36. If one has a wide street and a new walk is planned will only one side of the street be
shifted?
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Northeast Quadrant Meeting
37. What are the criteria for replacing existing old curb on new projects? Does not like the
aesthetics when curb is replaced piecemeal.
38. Now that curbs are not assessed they seem to be non-negotiable. Are walks negotiable?
39. 60th street is busy. Will walks be on both sides? Will road be narrower? Concern with
trees but want walk.
40. 60th is a straight shot with high speeds. Look at traffic calming.
41. Bruce Ave in Arden Park project does not need walk. Heavy traffic on 50th causing delays
for cars is more of a problem. Would like to see the final design for Bruce Ave.
42. The walk on Minnehaha Blvd by Arden Park is very long and many trees may be impacted.
Too expensive for the benefit.
43.
60'h street has design issues with topography. How is this dealt with? Would like walk but
concerned about trees.
44. Agree, want walk on 60th.
45. What are State Aid street width requirements?
46. In favor of walks and narrowing streets on 48th & 49th streets.
47. With all of the teardown construction on Halifax how can we restrict parking to one side?
48. Explain the speed greater than 85% criteria for walks.
49. What is the timeline for the plan?
50. Live in Strachauer Park neighborhood and would like to walk to Southdale. Would like
Hospital to add walk so we don't have to cross France twice.
51. Why is it so important to the city to add curb when there is no problem with current
design?
Sidewalks Facilities Map
Edina Southeast Quadrant Meeting
Resident questions and comments
Public Works, Nov. 19, 2014
1. Already paid for Street Recon and now upset that they are assessed again through
franchise monthly fees.
2. Cornelia Dr. — Don't want street narrowed, it's already repaved, what does that mean for
sidewalks? Would the sidewalk wait 20-30yrs for install? The sidewalk install would wait
sometimes unless there is a petition or council directed.
3. What if a petition comes in and the sidewalk is on the facilities map does it get installed
due to the school /park? Can the sidewalk be installed back of curb with the least amount
of impact?
4. Overall, there's no specific timeline for sidewalk install unless there's an upcoming street
recon.
5. The City surveys have never made it clear that it'd become policy if we said yes to
sidewalks. We can't read everything that is mailed to us. Please make the surveys more
clear and let us know if our vote is changing policy.
6. Resident read that a narrower road actually has traffic calming benefits.
7. What will happen to parking? It'd be on one side of the road right of way.
8. What about bike lanes? Are you not installing more of those?
9. What are the bike rules? Treat them like cars.
10. Survey responses say people want more sidewalks, but was there a specific question on
having the sidewalk in your front yard?
11. Are all residents surveyed? No.
12. Upset with personal addresses on survey and one of the surveys's had their name on it, so
the comments couldn't be anonymous.
13. What's the makeup of the Committee? The map has been developed since 1998, 2008,
ETC and other Boards and Commissions. Almost a 20yr process it's not new just
enhancing the plan.
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southeast Quadrant Meeting
14. West Shore Dr. is an Active Routes to School so it's changing to a collector street? Why is
the City using Active Routes to School to push sidewalks faster?
15. Where does West Shore Dr. collect too?
16. I've lived in Edina for 15yrs and thought communication on W 70th St and West Shore Dr.
felt very informative written on website or regular email. When I called questions were
answered compared to other cities I have lived in.
17. During West Shore Dr. recon a median on W 70th St and West Shore Dr. wasn't asked
about until it was ready to be signed off on the plans. Communications have improved
since then.
18. If no petition it'll be general life on West Shore Dr.?
19. What does changing West Shore Dr. to Active Route to School mean? It'll make it a
priority due to extra funding. Don't anticipate installing sidewalk unless Council directed
or it'll wait until street reconstruction.
20. Never asked for the opinion of residents on street.
21. Is there a factor that you won't force the install? If it's on the comp plan it'll be
recommended unless it's unsafe.
22. Who makes the decision on the street becoming a collector? Its active routes to school.
23. Kids take the bus why do they need sidewalks?
24. Need sidewalks because it's a safety issue. I see kids try to walk to school and they were
on the correct side of the street, but unless they have reflectors on it's still hard to see
them. Sidewalks are the safest thing.
25. Sidewalks are ugly and bring down property values.
26. Kids do walk to school and have a legitimate right to walk to school. Walking to school
kid's drop out of school less, they are happier, healthier and as adults we should be here
to protect them.
27. I've seen kids who can walk to school then get dropped off by car if it's raining.
28. Enforce traffic laws of speed at 30mph and not 35mph. People drive too fast we need
sidewalks.
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southeast Quadrant Meeting
29. The drivers will be more oblivious once the kids step off the sidewalk.
30. Kids are forced out into traffic without sidewalks.
31. Sidewalks will separate peds from traffic.
32. I have a safe community with kids walking to Cornelia on south part of West Shore Dr.
Kids take the shortest route to school, so we need sidewalks on the east and west streets.
(Belvidere Ln and Andover Rd)
33. Some sidewalks are great but on West Shore Dr. there's nothing that goes east/west.
There's fast speed with traffic.
34. Do we have traffic volumes during time of day when kids walk to school at Noon?
35. I have 275' of frontage who in this room would shovel that much sidewalk?
36. I would. I lived in Duluth when it received 150" of snow and I shoveled the sidewalk. I
currently live at 52nd and Xerxes Ave and I would shovel.
37. What happens when you're gone for a monthly in January? I have a neighbor who's gone
for an entire winter and they hire my son to shovel their sidewalk.
38. It all comes down to maintenance. Public Works clears snow on Active School and State
Aide. Council is currently asking staff to review the possibility of clearing all sidewalks and
the money would possibly come from the PACS fund.
39. Survey recon 90% said they didn't want sidewalks. On Dec. 11, 2012 Council meeting
discussed sidewalk down frontage rd. and council voted not to do it. We've done the
survey, had the Council meeting, how many times do we have to tell you No? This plan is
a vision of the future an overarching plan.
40. Do you have any ideas on insurance rates for liability?
41. Homeowners are responsible for maintenance of cracked sidewalks?
42. What's the life of a sidewalk?
43. How much money comes in from Safe Routes to school?
44. What about narrowing sidewalk widths?
45. What's the Right of way width?
Sidewalk Facilities Map: Southeast Quadrant Meeting
46. If the sidewalk was less than 5' wide I'd change my opinion.
47. Would like combination of curb and sidewalk so that there's no boulevard to mow.
48. Confusion from Oct 22nd Planning Commission West Shore Dr. was a collector now it's an
Active Route to school?
49. What's a certain walking distance from school?
50. Kids won't walk on West Shore Dr. they walk east to west.
51. West Shore Dr. was a future sidewalk now its active routes to school very confusing.
52. People show up when opposed on sidewalk, but Quality of Life survey says residents are
in favor. Has the City received other emails?
53. During as Street Recon every homeowner gets to vote. During a Quality of Life or Parks
survey only a few thousand residents get to vote.
54. Can PACS funds be used to survey every homeowner from US mail?
55. If the City decides in a few years to fund sidewalks, do we still have a say on the install?
56. Residents have no control.
57. If the City is doing prioritizing than the residents have no say. City Engineer makes
recommendation due to safety but Council has final vote.
58. I live at 66th St and Warren Ave. Where are you going to put the snow, because my house
is only 21' away from the road?
59. Is the City going to implement more equipment and staff to maintain sidewalks, if they do
will my taxes will go up?
60. Snow removal on Oaklawn Ave used to be with graders in the past and plowed slower.
61. Concern over Oaklawn Ave north and south than West shore Dr. fear of when City is
going to consider that a gateway to Fred Richards Golf Course.