HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-04-15 Meeting PacketAGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Transportation Commission
6:00 PM, Thursday, April 15, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
I. Call to Order
IL Election of Chair
III. Comments
a. Chair Comments
b. Community Comments
IV. Approval of Minutes
a. Regular Meeting of March 18, 2010 *#
V. New Business
a. France Avenue Restriping*+ c:°1)-N
b. Introduction to the Edina Transportation Commission#1:V
VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder)
VII. Public Works Small Area Guide Process Update (Commissioner Sprague)
VIII. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy)
IX. Staff Liaison Comments (p \\(")
vs. 66th Street Speed Study (Hold over till May)#
70th Street Reconstruction Update#
c. 169/494 Project Update#
d. 2010 State of the Commute Agenda#
X Commission Comments
XL Adjournment
* Attachment included
+ Item requiring action by the ETC
# Item for information only
During "Public Hearings," the Chair will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you
are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of
a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes or less. The Chair will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary.
Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration.
In order to maintain a comfortable environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of
verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed.
During "Public Comments," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals
must limit their presentations to three minutes or less and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a
matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the [Board or Commission] to respond to their comments. Instead, the [Board or
Commission] might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE
Edina Transportation Commission
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Geof Workinger, Jennifer Janovy, Tom Bonneville, Jean White, Michael Schroeder, Julie
Sierks, Usha Abramovitz, Nathan Franzen, Paul Nelson, Josh Sprague
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison
I. Call to Order
II. Comments
a. Chairman Comments
Chair Workinger reported that the City Council recently appointed over 35 new board
and commissions members, including three to the ETC. They were introduced as
Nathan Franzen, Josh Sprague and Paul Nelson.
b. Community Comments
None.
Ill. Acceptance of Meeting Summary
a. Regular Meeting of February 18, 2010
One correction was made to page 3, New Business — "Acting-chair Janovy suggested
reviewing the idea of creating bylaws." Commission Bonneville motion to approve the meeting
summary with the correction and it was seconded by Commissioner Janovy.
The minutes of January 21, 2010 was also motioned for approval by Commission Bonneville
and seconded by Commissioner Abramovitz.
IV. New Business
a. MnPass (Heidi Rudh)
Ms. Rudh explained that MnPass Express Lanes are carpool lanes that can be used by cars,
motorcycles, buses, etc. to increase the efficiencies of a roadway by giving solo drivers the
opportunity to use carpool lanes for a fee (maximum is $8.00). After setting up on account, the
average user uses the carpool lane at least twice monthly. Ms. Rudh explained further that the
hours of operation are 6:00-10:00 a.m. driving into downtown Minneapolis and 2:00-7:00 p.m.
leaving downtown. She fees generated are used for lane maintenance.
Chair Workinger suggested working with our Communications Department to create a short
segment for broadcast on our cable channel.
b. 66th Street Speed Study
Assistant city engineer Sullivan explained that a petition was received in 2007 requesting that
the speed limit be reduced on 66th Street between Valley View Road and TH-100; and the City
Council has referred it to the ETC for review and recommendation.
Mr. S ullivan explained that the roadway is currently signed 35 mph to Sherwood, and then it
goes down to 30 mph. He said the roadway was originally an entrance to TH-100 and most
likely carried more vehicles than it does today. He said there are sidewalks in place and a
Roslyn Park nearby.
iv)L. oat.. *AA- M-occvLA-,
Mr. Sullivan explaine further that because°66111-Street4a-e—E,tate Aid road, a speed study is
required by Mn/DOT and also because of the roads unique designation of "rural/residential
district" bounded on each side by "urban district." Data gathered shows that in 2005 there were
6,233 vehicles traveling at 38.1 mph; 2009 had 5,551 vehicles traveling at 33.9 mph; and most
recent data in 2008 shows 4,600 vehicles traveling at 39.1 mph. Mr. Sullivan said given that
the average speed is between 35-40 mph, Mn/DOT could reduce the speed to 30, leave it as
is, or increase it. He said they study could be done this summer.
Mr. Scott Solberg, 4201 W. 66th Street (petitioner) said his primary concern is safety and that
walking is dangerous because of the high speed. He said currently, there have been no
accidents, but he is concerned that the discussion to reduce W. 70th Street to 25 mph could
cause traffic to increase on 66th Street and, if W. 70th can be reduced to 25 mph, why not 30
mph on W. 66th Street.
After discussion, Commissioner Bonneville motioned that they recommend procedures
to change the roadway to a park road and include signage similar to those in school
zones for traffic to slow down when pedestrians are present, and to use this as a
potential strategic way of handling other park problems within the City. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Janovy with an amendment that the motion be tabled
pending further information on the discussion.
Further discussion ensued and Commissioner Bonneville agreed to withdraw his motion until
more information can be obtained.
Commissioner Sprague motioned to table the resolution pending further investigation.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner White. Commissioner Franzen requested
an amendment to have staff study the options discussed (park road designation/urban
district or rural/designate as park zone). The amendment was accepted.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Abrannovitz, Bonneville, Franzen, Janovy, Nelson, Schroeder, Sprague, White,
Workinger
Absent: Sierks
Motion carried rollcall vote.
Staff will bring this back to the ETC in April and chair Workinger asked that they do not begin
discussion until all requested information is available.
c. Introduction to the Edina Transportation Commission
Assistant City Engineer Sullivan recommended that this be tabled for a later meeting. He said
the intent is to explore the purpose of the ETC, including possibly hearing from residents. Chair
2
Workinger recommended that new members read the Transportation Chapter of the Comp
Plan which is used as a benchmark. Commissioner Janovy suggested updating the ETC Policy
to bring it in line with the Transportation Chapter. Sullivan said there should be some
discussion on how to modify the Policy.
V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder)
Commissioner Schroeder said while they are reviewing the senior housing, their major activity
continues to be the zoning ordinance update; and next month focus will be on the Small Area
Study.
VI. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy)
Commissioner Janovy said they are hosting a Bike Rodeo at Highlands School for children on
April 17.
VII. Staff Liaison Comments
a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update
Assistant City Engineer Sullivan said the plans have been sent to Mn/DOT for review and
anticipated start date is still May.
b. Metro Transit Route 6
Assistant City Engineer Sullivan said a revised map was sent out recently that appears to meet
the needs of most residents.
c. Community Comments from February 2010
Assistant City Engineer Sullivan said at the February meeting a resident had multiple traffic-
related concerns and they were addressed by Traffic Safety Committee and the resident was
notified.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner White said she is no longer the ETC's representative on the Small Area Study
committee. She said Commissioner Sprague expressed an interest and she had deferred to
him.
Commissioner Bonneville said he sent Mr. Sullivan a list of 15 items that he considers to be
duties of the ETC and the Planning Commission to determine what each should be doing. He
would like this added to the next agenda.
Com missioner Workinger said they will be electing a new chair at the next meeting. He said he
will continue to serve as Commissioner.
VIII. Adjournment.
3
Q
''f'
, . •
v.. O. —iblziggYx
•
=1n 111n 1111MliMtlEINIMER iiillt--15ar
tY,
i
F 1111111.11111.111.111.111.11.0 • 1111/1/1=EMn MANNAA
t1141I;
ILLLS,
out, -• • k
• n.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: EDINA TRANSPORATION
COMMISSION
Agenda Item Item No. V.A
From: Jack Sullivan ,
Assistant City Engineer
Action
Discussion
Information
X
X
Date: May 15, 2010
Subject: France Avenue Restriping — Hwy 62 to W. 54th Street
ACTION REQUESTED:
Recommend a motion to the City Council not opposing the restriping of France Avenue
from Highwa to W. 54th Street as depicted in the attached Plan from Hennepin
County.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:
City Staff has worked with Hennepin country staff to better redefine the lane usage
along France Avenue. Some alternatives looked at were the addition of bike lanes,
adding continuous turn lanes, or leave as is.
The addition of bike lanes would remove parking from both side of France Avenue. The
City of Edina Comprehensive Plan Update (fig. 7.11) shows France Avenue as a
primary bike route north of 60th Street and a secondary route south of 60th Street.
Hennepin County does not have France Avenue as a bike route.
The addition of a continuous turn lane would also remove parking from both side of
France Avenue.
Both staffs looked at keeping the parking and adding turn lanes at the major
intersections. This plan is conducive to a share the road format where bicyclists would
be able to utilize the parking area (when vehicles are not parked). This plan also
enhances the safety of pedestrians using the sidewalk on the west side of France
Avenue by pulling the traveling vehicles away from the sidewalk.
ATTACHMENTS:
Comprehensive Plan - Bicycle Facilities Fig. 7.11
Hennepin County — Striping Plan
Striping
Concept
Trunk Highway 62
to
54th St W Existing Curb
Existing No Parking
Existing Bus Stop
TYPICAL SECTION
44 '
12'
Thru Ln
'00
10'
Shld
12'
Thru Ln
10'
Shld
Bicycle Facilities
Figure 7.11
City of Edina
2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
ExislIng Existing Hennepin Proposed I From tho 2007 Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan
Park Pathway County Corridors Park Pathway I — — Primary Route — — — Secondary Route
LEGEND:
C C
I El
1,7M5.7
\\.)
"--\\
\
_
c—;,
m
7r:11:44::
cd(
/
0
CD
244/41a...-44441,44P 144.1
>
I
74450.11 4544_04,44
C-4'"
4
I NINE MILE CREEK I
4
WASHINGTON AVE,
mbe eat
-4 I , r
Yffi •
0414 441
IF
0:11%t\! wja. • „ •
-----------------
.•n •
-------------------------------------
---------------------
---------------------
• ----------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - atr
- -
116
1
0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 OD 4.1,
j /
W
:(.......4
0
0
. —.
*
...,--
, b.‘ti
\
0, 0,q
o-o
_
Ill
_
. J
C
slw (0
I t3— 4.i
( X-
CITY OF EDINA-
115 kV OVERHEAD
TA
atiCIrli6E.77;70crr,
.1'3ff
77-.-WIEM1111.10
C,o _
5 •,
5n pp.
, • o
=6) = 'Co
CITY OF• cEDEN 'PRA IRIE
IF
0 Z\ 0
=.= CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
1CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
III 5
.1/411111110. 114.141100.
_.,--------,,.-‘,\
,11AV
•••-•" "•--\\ •
Ne,
I.
H ,
r-
PEEL IMINRY
CCITT IC7 TO CHANCE
A I THCUT NOT ICE
1,L10. 07 C 4 /2010
TyT)A--F7-
PREL IM I NAR
SEBJECT TO CHANE, WI THOUT NOT! CE
DATE ISSLE3t 02 ,0 4 /2 0 10
400E1104
ihN
TH 169/1-494 Interchange
http://www.dot.state.mn.usimetro/projects/169/index.html
BACKGROUND:
o Early 1990s — Mn/DOT assumes jurisdictional responsibility for TH 169 after
Hennepin County reconstructs County Road 18 to expressway standards.
O Mid 1990s — Mn/DOT replaces the TH 169 bridges over 1-494 and reconfigures
diamond interchange to a three-quarter cloverleaf while retaining the north and
south ramp signals.
O 2003 — The interchange is identified as a Bond Accelerated Project and plans
developed, but funding was used on other critical projects.
O 2009 — The project was redesigned following the Mn/DOT's Context Sensitive
Solutions/Flexible Design initiative to balance competing objectives and optimize
return on investments.
• 2009 — FHWA approves performance-based design.
PERFORMALICM BASED DESOOLIg
O The design solution is based on performance. It rebuilds the interchange with six
ramps instead of eight as a phased approach instead of constructing all eight at
once which is the current federal policy for interstate highways. It removes
stoplights, reduces congestion and improves safety.
O It meets more than 90 percent of the needs while saving approximately $30 to $40
million in construction cost that Mn/DOT could use on other projects in the area.
IMPROVEMENTS:
o Remove the three remaining traffic signals.
O Connect the north and south frontage roads under TH 169.
O Convert expressway to freeway with partial-directional interchange reconstruction.
• Construct noise barriers, drainage and water quality facilities.
PROJECT COST
Mn/DOT Cost
$165 M
Local Cost Sharing $7M
Total Project Cost
$172 M
FUNDIMG:
Chapter 152 Bonds (State)
$50 M
Mn/DOT Federal Funds $75 M
Regional Federal Funds (TAB approved 3/17/2010)
$34 M
State Funds $6M
Local Funds
$7M
Total Funds $172
March 17, 2010
PROJECT SCHEDULE
July 1,2010
Ad Date/Issue RFP
October 1.2010
Proposals Due
October 15. 2010
Best Value Identified
November 15, 2010
Award Contract
Spring 2011
Begin Major Construction
For More
Information
Contact:
John Griffith
West Area Manager
Metro District
651-234-7728
john.griffith@state.mn.us
EXISTING CONDITIONS: 1. Southbound TH 169
2. Eastbound 1-494
PERMORMANCE BASED DESIGN:
3. Westbound 1-494
n
4. Northbound TH 169