HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-02-18 Meeting PacketAGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Transportation Commission
6:00 PM, Thursday, February 18, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
I. Call to Order
II. Comments
a. Chair Comments
b. Community Comments
III. Approval of Minutes
a. Regular Meeting of January 21, 2010 *+
IV. New Business
a„_ivinpass4Hebsti_Rudhyv
b. Transit Link-Metro Transit Dial a Ride revisions (John Harper)
V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder)
VI. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy)
a. Bike meeting minutes (February 11, 2010)*#
VII. Staff Liaison Comments
i. a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update#
b. 1-169/1-494 Interchange Improvement Update#
c. Metro Transit Route 6 Update#
VIII. Adjournment
Updated items as of Feb. 16, 2010
* Attachment included
+ Item requiring action by the ETC
# Item for information only
During "Public Hearings," the Chair will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you
are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of
a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
• Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes or less. The Chair will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary.
• Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration.
• In order to maintain a comfortable environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of
verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed.
During "Public Comments," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals
must limit their presentations to three minutes or less and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a
matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the [Board or Commission] to respond to their comments. Instead, the [Board or
Commission] might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
DATE: February 12, 2010
TO:
FROM: Jack Su!live
Edina Transportation Commission
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDINA
SUBJECT: February 18, 2010 ETC Meeting
ETC Members,
We have a light agenda this month. We will be seating 3 new commission members
for the March meeting. At that time, I plan to start an educational lesson or two
during each of our upcoming meetings to bring the new members up to speed (and
as a good refresher for seasoned members).
This month we will have a presentation on the newly operational MnPASS system on
35W. We may also have a presentation in March (possibly in February) on the
transition of the current Dial-a-ride service provided by Metro Transit to a Transit Link
service.
Please contact me with any questions you have.
Regards,
Jack
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Transportation Commission
6:00 PM, Thursday, February 18, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
I. Call to Order
II. Comments
a. Chair Comments
b. Community Comments
III. Approval of Minutes
a. Regular Meeting of January 21, 2010 *+
IV. New Business
a. MnPass (Heidi Ruhd)*#
V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder)
VI. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy)
VII. Staff Liaison Comments
a. 70Th Street Reconstruction Update#
b. 1-169/1-494 Interchange Improvement Update#
c. Metro Transit Route 6 Update#
VIII. Adjournment
* Attachment included
+ Item requiring action by the ETC
# Item for information only
During "Public Hearings," the Chair will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you
are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of
a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
• Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes or less. The Chair will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary.
• Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration.
• In order to maintain a comfortable environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of
verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed.
During "Public Comments," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals
must limit their presentations to three minutes or less and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a
matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the [Board or Commission] to respond to their comments. Instead, the [Board or
Commission] might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE
Edina Transportation Commission
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Geof Workinger, Jennifer Janovy, Tom Bonneville, Jean White, Michael Schroeder, Julie
Sierks
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Warren Plante, Usha Abramovitz
STAFF PRESENT:
Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by chair Workinger.
II. Comments
a. Chairman Comments
Chair Workinger noted that there were students in attendance. The students said they were
observing for a class project.
b. Community Comments
None.
III. Approval of Minutes
a. Regular Meeting of October 15, 2009 and December 17, 2009
The minutes of December 17, 2009, was modified as follows: page 2, item VI, 2nd paragraph,
3rd sentence, strike Planning Commission; page 3, item VIII, strike January and replace with
December.
Commissioner Bonneville motioned to approve December's modified minutes and
October's minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Janovy.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. New Business
a. TH 169 & Bren Road Interchange Presentation
City Engineer Lee Gustafson, City of Minnetonka, explained that the City of Minnetonka has
developed plans to upgrade the TH 169 and Bren Road interchange. He said the interchange
is at capacity as determined by traffic study due to redevelopments and new developments in
the Opus area, and new developments cannot proceed until the interchange is upgraded. He
said the plan includes a new, wider bridge with more lanes to prevent back ups, plus a
sidewalk for pedestrian mobility. He said the impact to Edina during and after construction will
be minimal. Construction is expected to begin April 2011. He said Edina's residents can stay
informed via Edina's website which will have a link to Minnetonka's website.
b. The Colony of Edina — 6200 Colonial Way
Assistant city engineer Sullivan said discussion began in 2009 on this 150 apartment (194
beds) development for the site located west of Tracy Avenue and north of the Crosstown
(behind the new fire station). The site is currently being used as a parking lot by Colonial
Church. He said the developers were asked to study the intersections at Tracy Avenue &
Olinger Blvd; Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way; and the area from the Crosstown entry/exit ramps
up to Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way. Mr. Sullivan said after review, it was determined that
these locations would continue to operate at level of service A & B.
Additionally, Mr. Sullivan said the developers were asked to respond to six issues, all of which
have been addressed satisfactorily. One of the issues included the stretch of road from
Crosstown to Tracy Avenue. The concern was with cars stacking while waiting to make a left
turn to go onto Colonial Way. It was determined that there would be enough gaps between
vehicles to prevent stacking. However, should this become an issue in the future, Mr. Sullivan
said Tracy Avenue is wide enough to accommodate a left turn lane.
Mr. Jay Jensen with The Waters Senior Living, Minnetonka, MN, spoke on behalf of the
development team. He explained that a similar development was done in Eden Prairie with
underground parking of 70 stalls, most of which are empty. With an average age of 86, Mr.
Jensen said majority of the residents are no longer driving. He said the Edina site will have
100 underground parking stalls for residents and employees with 80 surface parking spots. He
said traffic generation will be minimal and will be mostly from visitors in off-peak hours. He
said the facility will have a van to take residents on day trips, and a couple cars to drive them
to appointments.
In regards to the church losing a parking lot, Mr. Jensen said a parking study was conducted
and the church will continue to have sufficient parking for Sunday services, plus a cross
easement will be established so that they can use the 80 surface parking spots. Additionally,
Mr. Jensen said they will offer incentive for the 75 employees to use public transit (the area is
served by two buses with a park and ride conveniently located across the street).
After discussion, Commissioner Bonneville motioned to accept staff's recommendation
as follow and the motion was seconded by Commissioner White.
"If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion
recommending that the Transportation Study traffic for 6200 Colonial Way
does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system."
At Commissioner Janovy's recommendation "Transportation Study" was struck and replaced
with "traffic."
All voted aye. Motion passed.
c. Transportation Commission Role in Development Review
Commissioner Schroeder explained that the discussion of the ETC's role in the development
review process came about as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Update Committee's review of
ordinances and other issues. He said the newly formed committee, made up of Planning
Commission members, was organized in this way to give them more latitude to a) assess
what's working and not working; b) evaluate potential revisions; and c) confirm through
regulatory process with City Council.
2
Commissioner Schroeder said through feedback from residents, they've learned that the public
is interested and wants clarity regarding how the review process works. He said the same
feedback was shared by planning commissioners from other cities when their input was
sought. He said there are four things being looked at:
1. Bringing the ordinances in alignment with the Comp Plan;
2. Difficulty in navigating ordinances;
3. Development review process;
4. Content change, i.e. planned unit development (PUD), etc.
Additionally, Commissioner Schroeder said there are four commissions that give input in the
development review process; they are: Heritage Preservation, ETC, Energy, and Planning
Commission, and of these four, only the Heritage Preservation and Planning Commission have
statutory authority. He said clarification is needed regarding the role and responsibility of each
commission and how the public interacts with each. He said there needs to be a public input
process that is recognized and is consistent throughout the entire review process.
He said this is on the agenda for discussion because initially, the committee recommended
eliminating the ETC from the review process (relative to traffic studies) because, upon
reviewing the ETC's ordinance, it was determined that this was not one their responsibilities.
However, based on discussions at one of the committee's meeting that Commissioners
Workinger and Bonneville attended, the recommendation was tabled until a later date. Chair
Workinger then explained that the purpose of the discussion was to review the value the ETC
brings to the development review process.
The following summarizes the discussion that took place:
o Determined that City engineer staff or traffic consultant do not attend the Planning
Commission meetings when development proposals are being discussed.
o Commissioner Bonneville suggested that the ETC could become involve when: a) there
is a PUD; b) the project generates more than 1000 ADT; c) the project generates more
than 100 cars during the am/pm peak hours; d) the roadway is currently congested
(level of service E or worst), or is at 80% capacity; and e) when requested by the
Council or Planning Commission. He also suggested five improvements to the review
process starting with: 1) preliminary staff and developer meeting; 2) system of design
(who/what/when/and how process will flow); 3) system design of interactions of people
involved (developer/staff/commissions, etc.); 4) system design of decision-making
process; and 5) post decision action by City/developer.
o Not known if the number of traffic studies that the ETC review would be reduced based
on Commissioner Bonneville's suggestion.
o 90-day review process could be jeopardized when decisions are delayed (process
begins with the ETC, followed by the Planning Commission and then the Council).
o In the case of Little Schezuan Restaurant, the ETC could not separate onsite circulation
from on street parking, but were not allowed to address onsite parking.
o Planning Commission is not compelled to act on the ETC's recommendation because
the ETC is not in an advisory role.
3
o Suggestion that the Planning Commission ignore the ETC since operating at the same
level; and that the Planning Commission does their review concurrently; the ETC is
responsible for the Transportation Chapter and public roadways, while the Planning
Commission is responsible for the site; Planning Commission looks at transportation
issues from a different point of view and will not have as much interest in the
Transportation Chapter.
o Suggestion that the ETC becomes advisory to the Planning Commission.
o Each commission brings different insight and this should not be lost because residents
lack clarification.
o Developers are not required to attend the ETC meeting, but they are encouraged to
attend and present their proposal and answer questions; they are aware that the ETC is
advisory to the Council.
Commissioner Schroeder said the committee does not have a set decision-making timeframe
and suggested that the ETC assign two members to gather input from the public.
At the conclusion of the discussion, vice-chair Janovy suggested that commissioners email
assistant city engineer Sullivan their points-of-view on the discussion. Chair Workinger asked
that responses be sent by the following week Thursday.
d. Small Area Planning Process Presentation
Commissioner Schroeder explained that less than 10% of commercial space identified in the
Comp Plan would go through this process. He said the Small Area Planning process was
presented to the Council and they would like it applied to the old public works site. The process
is designed to work as follows:
o Engage residents and stakeholders to develop a plan that would be led by
community volunteers in a short, but intensive initial planning period (one month);
o The group would be made up of a Design Team (resident experts); a Technical
Advisory Group (city staff and other agencies); a Community Advisory Team
(representation from the each commission, school board, etc.); and the Public who
are encouraged to attend all scheduled meetings.
o Meetings dates and times will already be established before the groups are formed.
o Results expected is to develop a plan that would guide further planning and
development.
Some community members will be selected by the Planning Commission and others will be
selected by residents and other stakeholders in attendance. Commissioner White volunteered
to represent the ETC on the Community Advisory Team.
V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder)
See Commissioner Schroeder's presentations above (Items IV c & d).
VI. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy)
Commissioner Janovy reported that a member of the task force passed away. See minutes of
January 14, 2010, for detailed update of the BETF activities.
4
VII. Staff Liaison Comments
a. Southwest Transitway Route 3A
Assistant city engineer Sullivan reported that Route 3A was selected (this route bypasses
Edina).
b. NTMP Deadline
Assistant city engineer Sullivan reported that February 9, is the deadline for applications to be
submitted to the Engineering Department. Applications are online or also available in the
Engineering Department.
Other Comments:
Commissioner Bonneville asked assistant city engineer Sullivan to give a brief update on the
W. 70th Street project at future meetings.
Regarding the Complete Streets Resolution that was passed recently by Council,
Commissioner Janovy asked what is the next step in the process. Assistant city engineer
Sullivan said on February 4, the legislators will reconvene to develop a statewide framework.
He said there are no plans to do anything locally, except to continue with those things in the
Comp Plan and Transportation Chapter that are similar. Chair Workinger said he would like to
see the City develop a checklist of the major elements of Complete Streets that are
implemented in local plans.
Chair Workinger asked that the minutes going out to others for their meeting, even in draft
form, be sent to all ETC commissioners.
Chair Workinger said vice-chair Janovy will be chairing the next two meetings in his absence.
VIII. Adjournment.
5
I V.
4.6
MnPass Express Lanes
In the fall of 2009, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will expand its successful MnPASS
Express Lanes program by offering solo drivers on 1-35W the choice to pay a toll to access the
HOV/carpool lanes and enjoy reliable travel times between the southern suburbs and downtown
Minneapolis. Carpools with two or more occupants, motorcycles and transit buses will continue to
use the Express Lanes free of charge.
The two segments of I-35W included in the program are from Highway 13 in Burnsville to 1-494 and
from 1-494 to downtown Minneapolis. On a portion of the segment from 1-494 to downtown, transit
vehicles, carpools and MnPASS customers can drive on a converted shoulder lane north of 42nd
Street during certain times when traffic is congested. Electronic signs will alert drivers whether the
shoulder is open or closed.
The MnPASS Express Lanes program has been in existence on 1-394 west of Minneapolis since 2003.
Tolls are collected electronically using a transponder placed inside the solo driver's windshield that
debits the posted toll amount from a pre-paid account when the driver passes under gantries placed
along the roadway. Toll amounts will vary based on the level of congestion, and will be adjusted to
maintain a minimum speed of 50 miles per hour in the express lanes. Toll violations will be enforced
by the Minnesota State Patrol using visual means and electronic devices.
Project Benefits
Increase efficiency of existing roadway: Carpool lanes are underused and have the capacity to
accommodate more vehicles. By encouraging transit and carpools, and allowing solo drivers to pay a
toll to access the lanes, existing roadways can be used more efficiently.
Fast, safe, reliable travel: Through the use of dynamic pricing, Mn/DOT can manage the amount of
traffic in the express lanes and maintain free-flowing speeds even when the general purpose lanes are
congested. Motorists who choose to use the express lanes can count on reliable travel times.
Environmentally Friendly: Idling cars are a significant source of air pollution. By managing
congestion, drivers can conserve fuel, reduce air pollution and improve our environment.
Revenue reinvested in the corridor: Tolls collected will be used to operate the lanes and for other
transportation improvements in the I-35W corridor including transit.
Additional Information
If you would like more information on the 1-35W Express Lanes Project you may visit the website at:
www.mnpass.net. Or call the MnPASS Customer Service Center at 1-866-EZ-RIDE4 (1-866-397-4334).
You can also send questions by email to customerservice@mnpass.net.
Easy to get. Easy to use-
et
Downtown
Minneapolis
38th St.
North 46th St.
Minnehaha Pkwy.
60th St.
Richfield
Lyndale Ave.
Bloomington
82nd St.
90th St.
98th St.
minnesota Rver
Blackdog Rd.
(Entry and Exit Points II)
Burnsville
Easy to get. Easy to USe .TM
How to use the MnPASS Express Lanes
MnPASS Express Lanes are usually separated from regular lanes by double white lines. It's illegal to cross these lines.
Overhead signs and striping alert you to the entry and exit points for MnPASS Express Lanes. You may only enter
and exit MnPASS Express Lanes at designated points.
Overhead electronic signs display the current tolls—the price
you see is the price you pay. If you are a carpooler or
have a MnPASS transponder, you may
safely merge into the MnPASS
Express Lanes.
An overhead antenna reads
your MnPASS transponder
and automatically deducts the
posted toll from your prepaid
MnPASS account.
0 You get where you're going
faster and with less hassle.
I
MOTORCYCLES acabe
CAR POOLS, RUSE& 7
ACCESS AHEAD n _ACC
_..._ ..
What is MnPASS?
What are the MnPASS Express Lanes?
What are Express Shoulder Lanes?
Do transit users and carpoolers have to pay to use the MnPASS Express Lanes?
Do solo drivers have to pay?
How can I use MnPASS?
• How much does it cost to use the MnPASS Express Lanes?
er What if I only want to use the express lane occasionally?
How does the MnPASS System work?
How much does a MnPASS transponder cost?
u. How do I open a prepaid MnPASS account?
How do MnPASS subscribers manage their MnPASS accounts?
I have more than one vehicle. Do I need more than one MnPASS transponder?
What if I am a MnPASS customer who normally drives solo but decides to carpool with
a passenger in my car, how do I keep from being charged for that trip?
What if I use the MnPASS Express Lanes without an MnPASS transponder or without
two or more occupants in my vehicle?
• Do the MnPASS Express Lanes benefit all income levels?
• When solo drivers are allowed to enter MnPASS Express Lanes, don't those lanes
become congested?
▪ How are transit users and carpoolers affected?
How do express lanes affect traffic in regular lanes?
▪ Why don't we open the HOV lane to all traffic without restrictions?
What do people who actually use MnPASS Express Lanes think about them?
• How do express lanes differ from toll roads?
Do the MnPASS Express Lanes really work?
Easy to get. Easy to use
5/7
What is MnPASS?
MnPASS is a Minnesota Department of Transportation program that gives solo drivers a new
commuting choice-and "express" service that will save them time. It is also a better way to move
traffic in metropolitan areas and make better use of existing roadways.
What are the MnPASS Express Lanes?
The MnPASS Express Lanes are high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane or carpool lanes that have been
converted to "high-occupancy toll" lanes. With express lanes, solo drivers have the option of paying a
user fee to gain access to the lanes.
MnPASS Express Lanes currently operate on 1-394 between the western suburbs and downtown
Minneapolis. New express lanes will open later this year on I-35W, connecting southern communities
with downtown Minneapolis.
What are Express Shoulder Lanes?
An Express Shoulder Lane is equipped to operate as a MnPASS Express Lane during peak periods to
maximize capacity on existing roadways.
On I-35W between 42nd Street and downtown, transit vehicles, carpools and MnPASS customers will
be able to drive on the left shoulder during congested periods. Electronic signs will alert drivers
whether the shoulder is open or closed.
Do transit users and carpoolers have to pay to use the MnPASS Express Lanes?
No. transit riders and carpoolers can use MnPASS Express Lanes FREE of charge.
Do solo drivers have to pay?
It's your choice. The MnPASS Express Lanes offer solo drivers a new commute option: Pay to use the
carpool lanes to get a fast, reliable trip or remain in the general-purpose lanes. Unlike traditional toll
roads, drivers can choose on a trip-by-trip basis whether or not to pay to use the express lanes. If you
are a solo driver and want to use the lanes, you must have a valid MnPASS account and a MnPASS
transponder properly installed in your vehicle.
How can I use MnPASS?
MnPASS is easy to get and easy to use. You can get in the fast lane to MnPASS in three easy steps.
Open a prepaid MnPASS account.
Mount a MnPASS transponder on your windshield.
Get in the MnPASS Express Lanes and go!
How much does it cost to use the MnPASS Express Lanes?
Currently on the 1-394 Express Lanes, the tolls during peak hours normally range from $1.00 to $4.00.
It all depends on supply and demand. When the express lanes are empty, the price is reduced until the
lanes begin to fill. When the lanes begin to fill, the price increases until the lane empties and regular
highway speeds are restored. 90% of the drivers last year only paid $2.75 or LESS to travel on 394.
The average toll was $1.50.
Easy to get. Easy to use
(a/7
What if I only want to use the express lanes occasionally?
No problem. Use the express lanes as much as you want. You can choose whether to pay on a trip-by-
trip basis, and most MnPASS drivers do use the express lanes occasionally.
Anxious to avoid the expense associated with being late for day care, an appointment or work? Use
the MnPASS Express Lanes to get there on time.
How does the MnPASS System work?
MnPASS Express Lanes are easy to use.
The MnPASS Express Lanes are separated from regular lanes by either double white lines or a single
yellow line. It's illegal to cross these lines. Overhead signs alert you to the entry and exit points which
are separated from the regular lanes by dashed white lines. You may only enter and exit MnPASS lanes
at designated poi nts.
Electronic signs display the current fees—the price you see is the price you pay. If you are a carpooler
or a solo driver with a MnPASS transponder, you may safely merge into the MnPASS lanes.
An overhead antenna reads your MnPASS transponder and automatically deducts the posted fee from
your prepaid MnPASS account. With MnPASS, you get where you're going faster with less hassle. Just
get in and go!
How much does a MnPASS transponder cost?
Your MnPASS account works like a debit account. The minimum prepaid deposit is $40.00 per
transponder. There is also a $1.50 per month transponder per transponder lease charge. MnDOT owns
the transponder and takes responsibility for replacing the transponder if it malfunctions. When your
account balance falls below $15.00 or one-week usage averaged over a three-month period
(whichever is greater), the account is automatically replenished from your credit card or debit card.
How do I open a prepaid MnPASS account?
It's easy. You can open a prepaid MnPASS account with a credit card or debit card. There are three
ways to open an account:
Go online at www.mnpass.net.
Call 1-866-EZ-RIDE4 (1-866-397-4334).
Visit the MnPASS Customer Service Center at the MnDOT building—northwest corner intersection of Highway
100 and Duluth Street in Golden Valley.
How do MnPASS subscribers manage their MnPASS accounts?
MnPASS subscribers can access their account online at www.mnpass.net or by calling 1-866-397-4334.
You can also choose to:
Sign up for a FREE monthly statement by e-mail showing the date and time of each charge.
Set up a personal identification number (PIN), which allows you to view your account activity online.
For $2.00, you can have a monthly statement mailed to you.
Easy to get. Easy to use-
7
I have more than one vehicle. Do I need more than one MnPASS transponder?
It's your choice. You can obtain more than one transponder and tie all of them to a single account.
This is convenient for busy families and commercial operators with multiple vehicles. You may also
transfer your MnPASS transponder between vehicles.
What if I am a MnPASS customer who normally drives solo but decides to
carpool with a passenger in my car, how do I keep from being charged for that
trip?
If you have a second person in the car, simply remove the MnPASS transponder from its bracket. This
deactivates the transponder and you won't be charged the fee. Be sure to replace the transponder
next time you drive solo to avoid a fine!
What if I use the MnPASS Express Lanes without a MnPASS transponder or
without two or more occupants in my vehicle?
You would be in violation of state law and subject to a fine. The Minnesota State Patrol or other law
enforcement officers will enforce this law.
Do the MnPASS Express Lanes benefit all income levels?
Yes. Recent research indicates drivers of all income levels are equally likely to use the Express Lanes.
Surveys also reveal that people of all income levels support the idea.
When solo drivers are allowed to enter MnPASS Express Lanes, don't those lanes
become congested?
No. Studies show that congestion in MnPASS Express Lanes can be managed through something as
simple as supply and demand. When congestion increases, the price goes up; when congestion
decreases, the price decreases. Requiring solo drivers to pay a fee ensures bus riders and carpoolers
continue to travel in the express lanes at regular highway speeds.
How are transit users and carpoolers affected?
Transit users and carpoolers benefit. First, transit users and carpoolers can use the lanes FREE of
charge. Requiring solo drivers to pay a fee ensures bus riders and carpoolers continue to travel in the
express lanes at regular highway speeds.
Moreover, at a time when transit funding is being cut, bus riders benefit from express lanes tolls
because a portion of tolls are dedicated to funding transit improvements. In fact, a new Express Bus
service is planned for the new 1-35W MnPASS Express Lanes.
How do MnPASS Express Lanes affect traffic in regular lanes?
By allowing additional traffic onto underused HOV lanes, congestion in the general lanes is relieved.
For example, the 1-394 MnPASS Express Lanes remove an average of 3,000 cars a day from the
general-purpose lanes.
7
Easy to get Easy to use-
/
6/7
Why don't we open the HOV lane to all traffic without restrictions
Regardless of the relative merits of such an approach, the federal government opposes that approach
and would impose multimillion-dollar penalties on Minnesota if it took that step. No federal penalties
are associated with the use of express lanes.
What do people who actually use MnPASS Express Lanes think about them?
After the 1-394 express lanes opened, a survey of MnPASS subscribers found exceptionally high levels
of satisfaction (90 percent or better) with many aspects of the system.
How do Express Lanes differ from toll roads?
Unlike traditional toll roads such as those in Chicago and New Jersey, there is no need to stop at a
tollbooth to drop coins. With Express Lanes, there is no need to have cash or coins on hand. Instead,
the MnPASS electronic toll-collection system collects the user fee electronically at freeway speed. With
MnPASS, each driver can choose whether or not to pay a fee or remain in the general purpose lanes.
Do the MnPASS Express Lanes really work?
Research on MnPASS Express Lanes and other projects very similar to the MnPASS lanes shows that
express lanes effectively manage traffic, encourage transit use, are supported by consumers, fund
transit and freeway improvements and give drivers more options. These benefits are no longer a
matter of speculation—they are documented fact.
Easy to get. Easy to use-
Vct
totiEs0,4
4PaYlk:t'o
OF iftV'
What is a "managed road?"
In an effort to improve safety, ease congestion and maintain consistent speeds, the Minnesota Department
of Transportation is introducing a new concept to Minnesota drivers. This concept, called a "managed road,"
will provide drivers with more information and additional transportation choices to make travel safer and
create more reliable commute times. On Interstate 35W between Burnsville and downtown Minneapolis,
Mn/DOT will use ramp meters, freeway cameras and electronic signage to provide real-time information to
drivers that will help them make informed decisions. In addition, the new MnPASS Express Lanes and
express transit will help keep traffic moving at consistent speeds.
What kind of electronic signs will I see?
Approximately every half mile drivers will see electronic signs over each lane of traffic. The electronic signs
will inform drivers of incidents or lane closures and advise drivers on recommended speeds based on traffic
or weather conditions. A red 'X' indicates that a lane is closed; a green arrow indicates that the lane is open.
This innovative use of technology provides real-time information to drivers that improves safety and keeps
traffic moving to reduce congestion, keep speeds steady and makes commuting safer.
Over the MnPASS Express Lanes, signs provide drivers with needed information such as whether the lane
is open and the toll being charged for use of the lane at that time.
Why is the MnPASS lane between 42nd Street and downtown Minneapolis open sometimes and other
times it is closed?
On I-35W between 42nd Street and downtown, transit vehicles, carpools and MnPASS customers will be
able to drive on the left shoulder during congested periods. Maximizing the existing road capacity will help
keep traffic flowing smoothly. Electronic signs will alert drivers whether the shoulder is open or closed.
When I-35W is not congested north of 42nd Street, the shoulder will not be used as a MnPASS lane and will
be available for use by motorists in emergencies or by plow drivers to store snow temporarily during a snow
storm.
The new road also features emergency pull-offs on the right shoulder designed to accommodate vehicles
when motorists need to change a tire, exchange information in a crash or respond to other mechanical
breakdowns and enforcement.
View a demonstration
To view a demonstration of how the managed lane concept will work, go to the web at:
http://www.dot.state.mn. us/upa/animation/UPA_video. htm I
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
From:
Mayor & City Council
Boyd Tate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
February 17, 2009
Traffic Safety Advisory
Committee 2008 Annual
Report.
Agenda Item:
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Date
Subject:
To HRA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Action
The following traffic safety issues were handled in 2008.
Total traffic safety requests
acted upon in 2008: 209
Requests sent to the
Traffic Safety Committee: 72
Requests handled outside of
Committee: 137
Traffic Safety Committee
recommendations submitted
to City Council: 30
Approved: 12
Denied: 15
Referred/deferred: 3
Traffic Safety Committee Page 1 of 5
2008 Annual Report
February 19, 2008
Traffic safety issues handled
in committee/not sent to
Council: 38
Approved: 3
Denied: 7
Referred/deferred: 13
No action taken/needed: 14
Pending 1
The following is a breakdown of the 72 requests that went before the
Traffic Safety Advisory Committee:
Requests for stop signs: 11
Requests for other signs
(Slow Children/No Left Turn/
Yield, etc.)
16
Requests concerning parking
restrictions: 11
Traffic speed and volume concerns: 7
Requests for pedestrian crosswalks: 6
Parking problems: 5
Traffic signal timing concerns: 2
Request for in-street pedestrian sign: 2
Clear view issues: 3
Miscellaneous: 9
Total: 72
Traffic Safety Committee Page 2 of 5
2008 Annual Report
February 17, 2009
Request for stop signs: 11
Approved: 3
Denied: 8
Requests for "other" signs: 16
Approved: 8
Denied: 7
Refer/study/no action: 1
Requests for pedestrian crosswalks: 6
Approved: 2
Denied: 3
Refer/study/no action: 1
A total of 59 traffic safety studies were conducted on the following 49
streets in 2008. All studies (traffic volume, direction and speed) were for a
minimum 7-day period.
1. 54' Street @ Minnehaha Creek Bridge
2. 56th Street @ Minnehaha Creek Bridge
3. 59th Street east of Beard Ave
4. 66th Street @ Rosland Park
5. 69th Street, York Ave to France Ave (both directions; 6 separate
locations)
6. 70th Street, York Ave to France Ave (round-a-bout study; both
directions; 6 separate locations)
7. Belmore Lane west of Griffit Street
8. Concord Ave south of 58th Street
9. Concord Ave south of 60th Street
10. Concord Ave south of Concord Terrace
11. Concord Ave south of School Road
12. Division Street west of Brookside Ave
13. Division Street west of Oxford Ave
14. Division Street west of Rutledge Ave
15. Division Street west of Vandervork Ave
16. Dovre Drive east of Lincoln Drive
17. Gleason Road north of Indian Hills Pass
Traffic Safety Committee Page 3 of 5
2008 Annual Report
February 17, 2009
18. Gleason Road south of Indian Hills Pass
19. Halifax Ave @ 5115
20. Halifax Ave @ 5300
21. Hazelton Road, York Ave to France Ave (both directions; 6
separate locations)
22. Lakeview Drive east of St. Andrews Ave
23. Lakeview Drive north of Lexington Street
24. Lexington Street east of Lakeview Drive
25. Lincoln Drive north of Langford Drive
26. Lincoln Drive south of Londonderry Road
27. Mark Terrace Drive @ 7128
28. McCauley Trail north of West Trail
29. McCauley Trail west of Gleason Road
30. Normandale Road north of Richmond Drive
31. Normandale Road south of Eden Ave
32. Normandale Road south of Kent Ave
33. Normandale Road south of Normandale Court
34. Towns Road south of 48' Street
35. Tracy Ave north of Colonial Way
36. Tracy Ave south of Countryside Road
37. Tracy Ave south of Hawks Terrace
38. Tracy Ave south of Ridgeway Road
39. Valley View Road south of Brookview Ave
40. Valley View Road west of Tingdale Ave
41. Vernon Ave west of Ayrshire Blvd. (40 mph zone speed study)
42. View Lane @ 5720
43. Warren Ave @ 6454
44. West Shore Drive north of 70th Street
45. West Shore Drive @ 6717
46. West Shore Drive south of 66th Street
47. Wooddale Ave south of 52nd Street
48. Woodland Road @ #22
49. Woodland Road east of Wooddale Ave
In addition to the above, there were numerous informal telephone
conversations and in person street contacts where traffic safety issues
were discussed, but not documented.
Traffic Safety Committee Page 4 of 5
2008 Annual Report
February 17, 2009
Respectively submitted,
Boyd Tate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
Traffic Safety Committee Page 5 of 5
2008 Annual Report
February 17, 2009
Jack Sullivan
From: kirkjohnsonster@gmail.com on behalf of Kirk Johnson [Kirk.Johnson@LoganLogic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:20 PM
To: ann swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle; Scot Housh; Gordon Hughes; Wayne
Houle; Jack Sullivan; John Keprios; Surya lyer; Phil Larsen; Robyn Wiesman; Alex Dirr; Alice
Hulbert; Bob Fried; Carl Follstad, home; Carl Gulbronson; Donald Eyberg; Jennifer Janovy;
Joseph Hulbert; Larry Olson; Richard Griffith; Rob Erickson; Sally Dunn; Sarah Jakobsen;
Todd Brewer; Kelly Grissman; JVIaming@threeriversparkdistrict.org ; Peter Kelley
Subject: Bike Edina Task Force Meeting Minutes (February 11, 2010)
Dear City Council, Mayor Jim Hovland, Gordon Hughes (City Manager), Wayne Houle (City Engineer &
Director of Public Works), Jack Sullivan (Assistant City Engineer), John Keprios (Park and Recreation
Director), Edina Energy & Environment Commission, Sgt. Phil Larsen (Edina Police Department), and Bike
Edina Task Force & visitors Peter Kelley, Kelly Grissman, and Jonathan Vlaming:
Our February meeting minutes are pasted below. They are also online (source file link).
Other distribution:
• Jack Sullivan, please provide for the Edina Transportation Commision packet.
• Surya Iyer, please post for the Edina Energy & Environment Commission.
Thank you for your interest and support. Please review and contact me with any questions.
Bike Edina Task Force: News & Meeting Outcomes
February 11,2010
The Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) Meets monthly on the 2 nd Thursday of each month at 8 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room at
Edina City Hall. For questions contact Kirk Johnson, Chair. Guests are welcome to observe, space permitting.
• Online source: Source link here (httpincstreetsforpeople.orginode/1110)
• Present: Alex Dirr, Bob Fried, Carl Follstad, Carl Gulbronson, Donald Eyberg, Jennifer Janovy, Kirk Johnson, Richard Griffith,
Rob Erickson, Sarah Jakobsen, Todd Brewer
• Guests: Kelly Grissman (Three Rivers Park District); Peter Kelly; Robyn Wiesnnan; Jonathan Vlanning (Three Rivers Park
District); Keith Wolf.
• Absent: Excused absences include Sally Dunn, Larry Olson, Alice Hulbert. Absent with no prior communication: Joseph
Hulbert
• Recorded by: Sarah Jakobsen, Kirk Johnson
• Distribution: BETF, guests, City Manager, City Engineer, and Mayor & City Council. Also, Jack Sullivan to forward to the
Edina Transportation Commission, and Surya lyer to post for the Edina Energy and Environment Commission.
1. Nine Mile Creek presentation (includes questions/answers) -- Kelly Grissman, Sr. Program Manager from Three Rivers
Park District (8 to 8:20)
a. Project History—This trail was initially discussed 10 years ago. As a result of this discussion the city passed a
resolution supporting the park board in their work on this trail. Three Rivers recently regrouped to finalize the
route, implement the plan and secure funding. Open houses were held in February and March, 2009. As a result
1
of the open houses, some routes were removed due to being less than ideal. In September an Environmental
Assessment team was formed, and in August a Community Assessment team (CAT) was established (one neighbor
representative per segment [14 total], watershed district, school district, and Alice Hulbert. In 2008, City adopted
BETF plan which significantly overlaps with TRPD plan.
b. Trail overview—this trail will connect to several regional trails and provide connections to Chaska, Grand
Rounds, Mall of America, etc. Some sections of the connecting trail are currently in place; some sections are the
planning stage and some will be implemented as part of a complete streets project. Regional trails are coming
in from west and east and Edina needs to be a connector for the two.
c. Goals—Connecting with Edina High School Campus, Edina Promenade, and creating a safe multi-use regional
trail.
d. Current status—Field work was completed in December 2009.
e. EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) findings will help determine is any portions of the trail are not
feasible.
f. Community Assessment Team will evaluate the social feasibility of each route and provide design suggestions
for consideration.
g. Status—Team has completed field visit of each route and is generating a list of pros/cons and how to quantify
each component.
h. Next steps—finalize list of pros/cons, review EAW findings, quantify pro/cons list, and finalize design
recommendations, determine route and then secure funding.
i. Follow up questions—Who has decision making power? The Park District and City Council will review the
findings of the EAW and determine if any routes are not environmental feasibility and remove these routes from
further consideration. The Park District will preliminary review the estimated costs of each route and remove any
routes that are not financially feasible. Then the remaining routes will be forwarded to the City Council for
consideration in determining the final route. Any portions of the route are on school district property must be
approved by the school district. Any routes are adjacent to the creek must be approved by the watershed district.
Then the route is forwarded to Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners for final consideration and
approval.
j. BETF is charged with helping assess the needs of the community as a whole. The next CAT meeting is 6:30 on
Feb. 17 on first floor of Edina Senior Center.
k. Kelly Grissman is the Project Manager for this effort. She is the Senior Manager of Planning;
kgrissman@threeriversparkdistrictorg.
2. Agenda & presentation draft for next Tuesday's Council/City Staff workshop -- Kirk (8:20 - 8:35)
a. The source is here. BETF to review.
b. Kirk Johnson to solicit feedback from BETF by Tuesday noon, February 16th
c. The meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. and is approximately 1 hour
3. Bylaws: Note that our Bylaws (source) are completed -- thanks to Carl Follstad, BETF, and Gordon Hughes for reviews
and inputs (which occurred the day after our meeting; reporting here).
4. Safe Routes to Schools Update / Bike Rodeo / Bike Parking SHIP -- Rob & team (8:35 - 8:45)
2
a. Working on survey for Bike Rodeo; looking to PD for food and beverage donations, complete support from
Highlands Elementary.
b. Need volunteer from most/all BETF members.
c. Contact Rob Erickson if you haven't volunteered yet -- everyone is expected to have a role in the Bike Rodeo
on April 17th.
5. National Bike Summit -- Representative from Edina Bike & Sport is attending this event and would like a list of issues -
- Carl G (8:45 - 8:50 minutes);
a. Chris Rode, Manager at Edina Bike & Sport is part of the MN delegation which will be lobbying congress to
advance the bicycling legislation and funding.
b. Content is solicited for BETF for suggestions, topical issues or projects which require the attention of MN
Senators and Congress People; contact Kirk Johnson who will relay ideas to Chris Rode.
6. Bicycle Friendly City Application draft
a. In progress, due February 19th .
b. Meeting with Gordon Hughes and Wayne Houle on Wednesday, February 17th to review certain questions.
c. Kirk Johnson will submit after getting final approval from Gordon Hughes and Jim Hovland, aiming for
Thursday February 18th. The application is due on the 19th .
d. Source is here.
7. Edina Bike Festival May 15 -- volunteers requested from Mary Brindle -- Kirk
a. Rob Erickson followed-up with Mary after the meeting.
b. Kirk Johnson and Mary Brindle agreed after the meeting to be in touch approximately quarterly to coordinate
any related activities and support each other's groups (BETF & Edina Morningside Rotary).
Questions or corrections? please contact Bike Edina Task Force Chair, Kirk.Johnson@LoganLogic.com
Kirk Logan Johnson
Kirkjohnson@LoganLogic.com
(612) 916-9966 (Cell)
3
Jack Sullivan
From: Jack Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:59 AM
To: Geoffrey Workinger (gswork@aol.com); Jack Sullivan; Jean White (jmawhite@aol.com);
Jennifer Janovy (jkj966@aol.com); Josh Sprague (josh@joshsprague.com); Julie Sierks
(jsierks2@comcast.net); Michael Schroeder (Mschroeder23@msn.com); Nathan Franzen
(nfranzen@westwoodrenewables.com); Paul Nelson (pnelsonrrr@aol.com); Sharon Allison;
Thomas A. Bonneville (TABonneville@aol.com); Usha Abramovitz (nanimeghani@aim.com);
Wayne Houle
Subject: FW: Please forward to ETC with revised agenda
ETC Members,
Attached is a link as well as the text version of the update on Complete Streets Legislation at the State.
http://www.bikemn.org/news_detail.cfm?id=783DB9CD-FCE9-45B4-B1B2-D8OAAA96BFAB
I'll provide a hard copy at tonight's meeting as well.
Regards,
Jack
Jack D. Sullivan, PE
Assistant City Engineer
City of Edina
Direct: 952.826.0445
fax: 952.826.0389
jsullivan@ci.edina.mn.us
02/09/2010
(ST. PAUL) - A measure to make roads safer and more accessible for all Minnesotans — regardless of age or
ability or whether traveling by car, bus, bike or on foot — was introduced into the Minnesota legislature today.
The "Complete Streets" bills, SF 2461 and HF 2801, are supported by a broad coalition of health, family,
environment, senior, and transportation advocates who attended an afternoon press conference.
"We live on the edge of Eagan and Rosemount just a couple miles from Lebanon Hills Park and a new library —
but the sad part is we can't get to these places safely on foot or by bike," said Jene' Leiner, an Inver Grove
Heights mother of three young children. "I'd like my kids to be active, but I'd rather start up my car and drive
them than risk their safety along a 50 mile per hour road with no sidewalks or bike lanes."
Complete Streets is a common-sense design process that helps the Minnesota Department of Transportation
respond to local needs and local users. Complete Streets removes the need for multiple designs and variances
in an effort to build roads right the first time, rather than fixing them after a tragedy occurs.
In the past decade, more than 500 bicyclists and pedestrians have been killed, and another 20,000
injured on Minnesota roads, said Minnesota Representative Mike Obermueller (DFL — Eagan), House author„
about his impetus for sponsoring the bill.
"One of the reasons for these injuries and fatalities is that state standards too often dictate that Minnesota
roads move cars as quickly as possible and ignore the abilities of seniors, children, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
transit riders," Obermueller said.
"Minnesota seniors and children are especially vulnerable to transportation systems that are designed almost
exclusively for moving automobiles," said Bob Geyen, State Volunteer Leader for AARP, one of
48 organizations supporting the bill. Geyen pointed to the example of an 86-year-old Chaska man, who was
struck and killed by a car as he tried to walk across busy Highway 41 to go to church.
"That very unfortunate outcome could have been prevented had the road been designed for all users,
regardless of age or ability," Geyen added.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (Blue Cross) also backs the bill. Blue Cross' Chief Prevention Officer,
Dr. Marc Manley, cited the more than 60 percent of adult Minnesotans who are overweight or obese and said
that if left unchecked, obesity will add another $3.7 billion in health care expenses for Minnesotans by 2020.
"Current road designs often create barriers and discourage people from walking and biking," Manley said, "We
need to make it easier for people to be active and achieve or maintain a healthy weight. This Complete Streets
policy is a creative solution that not only can make our transportation dollars stretch farther, but also
encourage more people to lead an active lifestyle, thereby improving health and saving health care dollars."
The Minnesota Department of Transportation issued a state-mandated report last year in favor of a state
Complete Streets policy.
Nationally, eighteen states and more than 100 communities have policies supporting complete streets. In
Minnesota, Rochester, St. Paul, Albert Lea, Bloomington and Hennepin County have either passed Complete
Streets policies or are working to implement them.
The Complete Streets concept is broadly supported by Minnesotans. A recent statewide poll by the Minnesotan
Environmental Partnership found that 73 percent of Minnesotans support a policy that would encourage
communities to build roads for all users, including transit riders, bicyclists and pedestrians.
Senator Tony Lourey (DFL — Kerrick), chief Senate author, said Complete Streets would only change the
design of future projects, and not demand the retrofitting of existing roads. In the long run this will potentially
save money by preventing costly retro-fits that sometimes occur when a street or road is deemed unsafe for
pedestrians and other users, Lourey added.
Complete Streets has bipartisan support in the legislature. Other authors include:
Senate:
Sen. Tony Lourey (D-Kerrick)
Sen. Scott Dibble (D-Mpls)
Sen. Michael Jungbauer (R-East Bethel)
Sen. Ann Rest (D-New Hope)
Sen. Julie Rosen (R-Fairmont)
House:
Rep. Mike Obermueller (D-Eagan)
Rep. Bernie Lieder (D-Crookston)
Rep. Kim Norton (D-Rochester)
Rep. Dan Severson (R-Sauk Rapids)
Rep. Phillip Sterner (D-Rose mount)
Members of the Complete Streets Coalition, include:
2
AARP
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability
Alliance for Sustainability
American Council of the Blind of Minnesota American Heart Association Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota
Bloomington City Councilmember Steve Elkins Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota Blue Zones--Dan
Buettner Catalyst Cedar Ave United City of Saint Paul Conservation Minnesota Dero Bike Rack Company Fit
City Duluth Fresh Energy Friends of Washington County Growth and Justice Havefunbiking com
HealthPartners Howard R. Green Company Joe Urban, Inc.
Local Initiatives Support Corporation
Lutheran Coalition for Public Policy in Minnesota Minneapolis Electric Bicycle Company Minnesota Center for
Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Minnesota Council of Nonprofits
Minnesota Environmental Partnership Minnesota Public Interest Research Group Minnesotans for Healthy
Kids Coalition Northfield Nonmotorized Transportation Task Force Pates Planning and Design Parks & Trails
Council of Minnesota Red Wing Housing and Redevelopment Authority Saint Paul Councilmember Russ Stark
Saint Paul Riverfront Corporation Shifting Gears Bicycles Sierra Club North Star Chapter St. Paul Smart
Trips The Arc of Minnesota Transit for Livable Communities Transportation for America's Minnesota
Coalition Twin Cities Streets for People Urban Land Institute Minnesota 1000 Friends of Minnesota
For more information on the Minnesota Complete Streets effort, visit www.mncompletestreets.org
3
Memorandum
To: Adam Harrington, Assistant Director — Service Development
From: John Dillery, Sr. Transit Planner — Route & System Planning
Date: February 18, 2010
Subject: Route 6EFK — Centennial Lakes, Edina Re-alignment Synopsis
2003-2004: Central-South (Sector 5) Plan implemented. Route 6 extended with frequent
timed transfers between routes 6 and 540 at Minnesota Dr., as recommended.
Mid-2005: Metro Transit Service Development, Street Operations and Edina city staff
reviews potential route alignments for a "circulator route" south of Southdale in the
Centennial Lakes area. This concept is described in the city's Greater Southdale Area
Study of December 2005. Re-alignment of Route 6 considered as an option.
Mid-2008: Hennepin County Public Works Pedestrian/Bike Study includes France Ave in
Edina (County Rd. 17) as needing improvements. Study concludes that improvements
are not likely for many years. The segment south of Southdale has no sidewalk for most
of the distance on the northbound side, making for a poor environment for waiting
passengers. Metro Transit planners begin reviewing alternative alignments for Route 6
that would minimize use of this segment of France Avenue.
May 2009: Metro Transit alternative Route 6 alignment finalized improves safety and
convenience for customers connecting to destinations on the east side of France Ave
including Centennial Lakes Shops. New route uses Edinborough Way and Parklawn
Avenue which had not previously been used by city buses. Requested concurrence of
City of Edina Public Works Department was received on May 15th. City staff determined
that the streets are adequate for axel loads of city buses and that they would cause no
traffic issues. The new segment of Edinborough Way is classified as a city
neighborhood street. Parklawn Ave is classified as a collector street.
June 23, 2009: Metro Transit sends an informational letter to residents of Parklawn Ave,
Edinborough Way and Gallagher Drive explaining the planned bus route change,
including a map and description of the frequency and span of the service. Letter
specifies that the new route is planned to begin on Saturday, September 12, 2009.
August 10, 2009: Petition opposing route change is received from residents of Coventry
Lane Condominiums, which are on the north side of Parklawn Ave. between France Ave
and Edinborough Way. The petition is signed by 56 people living in 43 of the 96
condominiums, or 45%. Two residents responded that they would ride bus, did not sign
the petition. Petitioners' concerns: bus noise, added traffic volume, restricted sight lines
at the intersection of Coventry Lane with Parklawn.
1 Route 6EFK-Edina_Synopsis to Feb 2010 aeh.doe
September 2009: Petitioners' concerns are discussed at the Edina Transportation
Commission (ETC) meeting of September 17th. Metropolitan Council member Polly
Bowles asks that Metro Transit staff respond to petitioners' concerns with involvement of
city staff. CM Bowles is briefed after meeting between Metro Transit and Edina Public
Works staff on September 291h . Response made as Metro Transit sends a position
paper describing the rationale for the Route 6 re-alignment at the request of the city.
October 2009: The position paper is forwarded to the Edina Transportation Commission
(ETC) on October 12th. At the ETC meeting on October 15th-the following points are
made by city staff:
1) the new bus route causes no operational or safety problems
2) Metro Transit and Metropolitan Council will discuss with the residents their concerns.
3) New route should operate without major change for 12 months to develop market
4) Metro Transit has authority to manage its operations in the city
5) The new route does not conflict with the City's recent Comprehensive Plan Update.
The ETC recommends to the City Council that the concerned residents meet with Metro
Transit and city staff as soon as possible to develop solutions. Mike Bochert and Scott
Edstrom of Coventry Lane testified at the meeting, offered to meet with staff. CM Bowles
briefed after meeting, requests to participate in meeting with the residents.
Metro Transit staff coordinates new bus stop location with the manager of the Centennial
Lakes Shops.
Melissa Madison of 1-494 TMO writes the Edina Mayor and City Council in support of the
Route 6 change, stating that it enhances access to residents and employers in Edina.
November 11, 2009: Metro Transit staff, Edina City Staff, Council Member Polly Bowles
and concerned residents meet to discuss alternative bus routings as requested by the
Edina Transportation Commission. Issues from the petition reviewed, Metro Transit
commits to evaluating routing and service level once ridership by bus stop can be
observed through the end of the year and into 2010, then communicate results, consider
ideas from residents and make adjustments as appropriate.
January 2010: Fall 2009 ridership data from all Route 6 trips sent to interested parties.
The bus stops closest to Centennial Lakes Shops showed these counts: Weekday = 14
on/ 23 off; Saturday = 14 on/ 29 off; Sunday = 9 on/ 14 off. Imbalance not explained
easily. Metro Transit planners interpret the "off' counts as more indicative of the
ridership attracted by the Centennial Lakes area.
Residents send route concepts that include eliminating service on the Parklawn Avenue
from Edinborough Way consistent with the 2009 petition.
2 Route 6EFK-Edina_Synopsis to Feb 2010 aeh.doc
January 28, 2010: Metro Transit planners communicate to city staff and the concerned
city residents via e-mail the recommended plan to modify bus route 6 around the
Centennial Lakes area based on the information and concepts to date. The change,
planned for May 15, 2010, re-routes the northbound buses off Edinborough Way north of
76th St. and Parklawn Avenue from Edinborough Way to France Ave., instead following
76th St. west to France Ave north to Parklawn Ave. west. The southbound buses will
remain on Parklawn from France Ave to Edinborough Way and on Edinborough Way
from Parklawn Ave to 761h St.
This accomplishes:
1. Southbound transit customers destined for Centennial Lakes do not have to
cross busy France Ave: buses stop at both Parklawn and 76th
2. Northbound transit customers destined for Centennial Lakes do not have to cross
busy France Ave: buses stop at 76th only.
3. ALL northbound buses currently operating on Edinborough Way, stopping and
turning left onto Parklawn are removed.
4. A 52% reduction of trips: -45 on weekdays, -35 on Saturdays and Sundays.
May 15, 2010: Metro Transit implements modified Route 6 alignment at Centennial
Lakes in Edina. Ridership data and analysis begins.
3 Route 6EFK-Edina_Synopsis to Feb 2010 aeh.doc
Date notice was pos / U /Id q Time notice was posted: (77Yg
Signed
fficer Posting Notice
Signed andy worn to before me, a Notary Public
in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, this
INI-\ day of }) r1/1 n , 20
NOTARYAIMPUEBELICC-ANMIENPANESOrA COMMISSIOn EXPira Jai 31, 2013
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING NOTICE
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting 6-9 010W13/4 Vi‘Ce'" Off or the
City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesotaf do hereby certify that I
have on this date posted copies of the attached Meeting Notice, at each of the
official City bulletin boards, located at conspicuous places within the City as
follows:
1) City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
2) Municipal Liquor Store, 50th and France Business Area
3) Centennial Lakes Park Centrum, 7499 France Avenue South
Revised: June 2006
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
GREATER CORNELIA AREA/ WEST 70 TH
STREET TRAFFIC STUDY
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday,
February 17, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. to hear and consider the Edina
Transportation Commission's recommendation for improvements to West
70th Street, between Highway 100 and France Avenue.
Debra Mangen
City Clerk
February 6, 2009