HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-05-20 Meeting PacketAGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Transportation Commission
6:00 PM, Thursday, May 20, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
I. Call to Order
IL Approval of Minutes
a. Regular Meeting of April 15, 2010 *#
III. Old Business
a. 66 th Street Speed Study *+
IV. New Business
Edina's Greenstep Cities #
6,13A. CVS Transportation Impact Analysis (69th and York Avenue) *+
, c. Upcoming Workshops
V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) #
VI. Public Works Small Area Guide Process Update (Commissioner Sprague) #
VII. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) #
VIII. Staff Liaison Comments
a. 70 1h Street Reconstruction Update #
IX. Commission Comments
X. Adjournment
* Attachment included
+ Item requiring action by the ETC
# Item for information only
During "Public Hearings," the Chair will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you
are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of
a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes or less. The Chair will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary.
Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration.
In order to maintain a comfortable environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of
verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed.
During "Public Comments," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals
must limit their presentations to three minutes or less and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a
matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the (Board or Commission] to respond to their comments. Instead, the [Board or
Commission] might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
MINUTES OF THE
Edina Transportation Commission
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Usha Abramovitz, Tom Bonneville, Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder,
Josh Sprague, Jean White, Geof Workinger
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Nathan Franzen, Julie Sierks
STAFF PRESENT:
Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by chair Workinger.
II. Election of Chair
Commissioner Sprague nominated vice-chair Janovy and the nomination was seconded by
Commissioner Nelson. There being no further nominees, all voted aye. Chair Janovy's term
will expire in one year.
Ill. Comments
a. Chair Comments
Chair Janovy took leadership immediately and thanked the commission. She said election of a
vice-chair would be tabled until the next meeting.
b. Community Comments
None.
IV. Approval of Minutes
a. Regular Meeting of March 18, 2010
The following corrections were made: Item IV.a., last sentence, strike "She..." and replace with
"The..." Item IV.b. 3rd paragraph, strike "...because 66th Street is a State Aid road..." and
replace with italic "...a speed study is required by Mn/DOT to be consistent with state
statute...
Commissioner Workinger motioned to approve the minutes with the above corrections. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner White. All voted aye.
V. New Business
a. France Avenue Restriping
Assistant City Engineer Sullivan explained that Hennepin County is planning to mill and
overlay France Avenue from the Crosstown to W. 54 th Street and the City has met with them to
discuss options to address how the road is currently being used such as is it a 4-lane, is
parking allowed, etc. After discussion, the proposed plan is to restripe the roadway with one-
lane in each direction with parking allowed everywhere with the exception of the intersections
at 58th, 60th and 62nd Streets which would be striped with designated left turn lanes. Mr.
Sullivan stated further that the width of the roadway would remain the same. He also said that
bike lanes were discussed but Hennepin County was not in favor since Xerxes Avenue is their
primary bike route.
Discussion ensued and concerns raised includ d the fact that the recently approved Comp
Plan i cludes France Avenue as a bike rout ven though the County is not in favor of bike
lane ). from a bike perspective, the project silould have been brought forward in November
when the discussion began; and were all options considered.
Commissioner White motioned to accept staff's recommendation that the "City Council not
oppose the restriping of France Avenue from Highway 62 to W. 54th Street as depicted in the
attached Plan from Hennepin County." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nelson.
Commissioner Workinger offered an amendment to include a 'traffic merge sign' or restriping
at W. 54th Street for southbound traffic traveling from a perceived two-lane roadway going into
one-lane. His amendment was accepted by Commissioners White and Nelson.
Ayes: Abramovitz, Bonneville, Nelson, Sprague, White, Workinger
Nayes: Janovy, Schroeder
Absent: Franzen, Sierks
Motion carried.
b. Introduction to the Edina Transportation Commission
Assistant City Engineer Sullivan explained the purpose, duties, membership and history of the
ETC. Mr. Sullivan said the ETC was formed by Council with 10 members from different
geographical areas of the community. The ETC's purpose and duties include advising Council
on matters related to streets operation, enhancing mass transit opportunities, offer
recommendations and implementations for the Local Traffic Task Force findings, and evaluate
methods for traffic calming and speed and volume mitigation. He said the guiding documents
are the Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations (2003); the ETC policy
(2005); and the Transportation Chapter from the Comp Plan.
VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder)
Commissioner Schroeder said the continued focus is on the ordinance update.
VII. Public Works Small Area Guide Process Update (Commissioner Sprague)
Commissioner Sprague said four meetings have taken place so far that included selecting
quadrants and at-large representatives, orientation and tour of the site, and developer and
business owner roundtable discussions. Next meeting will be a community input session,
followed by a summary meeting, design charrettes, and an open house.
VIII. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy)
Chair Janovy said a bike rodeo is planned for this Saturday, 10-Noon, at Highland School.
Other events include a self-powered vehicle ride on May 15, 9-Noon, at Roslyn Park; and a
ride to Quality Bicycle Products in Bloomington, date and time will be announced later.
IX. Staff Liaison Comments
a. 66th Street Speed Study (Hold over until May)
This item is held over until May to pursue all options related to reducing the speed limit.
2
b. 70th Street Reconstruction Update
Plans are at Mn/DOT for review and the construction schedule remains the same.
c. 169/494 Project Update
Mn/DOT received funding for this $170M project (the City's portion is expected to be $1.2M
from its State Aid funds). The schedule at this time is to accept bids in early October to
November and begin construction in 2011. It is expected to be a 2-3 year project.
d. 2010 State of the Commute Agenda
Mr. Sullivan said earlier this month, he attended the 494 Corridor Commission's 2010 State of
the Commute meeting. He said the commission is made up of businesses, cities, etc. along the
TH-494 corridor that uses the corridor to travel primarily to and from work. He said their goal is
to increase multi-modal transportation and they recently opened a bike library for the purpose
of loaning bikes to individuals who would like to commute using a bike but do not have one.
X. Commission Comments a
Commissioner Sprague said he is looking forward to delving into the ,TC policy as mentioned
by Mr. Sullivan, possibly in a work session format as well as local collector street policy. He
said the City of Bloomington has some great examples.
Commissioner White suggested looking at alternative striping for Vernon Ave (between Hwy.
100 and Crosstown) when it comes up for reconstruction.
Commissioner Workinger said at the next meeting, he would like to hear the types of options
given to residents on West 70th Street for driveway turnarounds (to prevent backing out onto
the street) and the number of homeowners who were given this option to be paid for by the
City. He also suggested allowing residents to give input into the landscaping because they
could probably do a better job than anyone else. Commissioner Sprague said they sent a letter
to the City and in a response, they were told that the east and west end would be landscaped
and the boulevards would be grass, and that a landscape architect would do the design and
the plans would be posted to the website as part of the bidding process and residents can
provide input at that time. Mr. Sprague said he has heard that some residents would like to do
boulevard gardens so an opportunity for input would be good. Chair Janovy said an interesting
presentation probably would be to see how landscaping shapes traffic calming.
Commissioner Nelson said he is a member of the Southwest Corridor (for light railway) and he
will be able to give updates in the future.
Commissioner Bonneville said he would like the ETC to look at Xerxes Avenue from TH-494 to
Crosstown because he thinks of it as a reliever route which is already designed with multiple
lanes. And discuss with Mn/DOT the possibility of increasing access from TH-494 and as a
partial solution as a truck route, instead of W. 70th.
Commissioner Bonneville reminded the commissioners of the streamline development process
that was discussed at an earlier meeting as it relates to the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Schroeder was asked where the Planning Commission was in their planning
efforts. Commissioner Schroeder said they have curtailed their work on the Zoning
Commission due to the Small Area Study. He also said they do not have a timeframe in which
to finish what they've started because the processes that they are looking at do not need to
3
conform to the Comp Plan. Commissioner Sprague said this could become a part of a work
session as the ETC discuss its own policy.
VIII. Adjournment.
Meeting adjourned.
4
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: EDINA TRANSPORATION
COMMISSION
Agenda Item Item No. III.A
From: Jack Sullivan .5
Assistant City Engineer
X Action
Discussion
Information Date: Original: March 18, 2010
Revised: May 20, 2010
Subject: West 66th Street Speed Study
ACTION REQUESTED:
Recommend to the City Council adoption of the attached resolution lowering the speed
limit on West 66" Street from 35 mph to 30 mph from TH 100 to Valley View Road.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:
This issue was first brought to the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) in 2007 by eight
residents who live on or near West 66th Street. Their request was to lower the speed
limit on West 66th Street between Highway 100 and Valley View Road from the current
posting of 35 mph to 30 mph. (Attachment A)
The recommendation of the TSC was to request that the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) perform a speed study along West 66th Street from TH 100 to
Valley View Road for consideration of reducing the speed limit from 35 to 30 mph. A
resolution requesting the speed study from MnDOT was presented to the Council on
February 16, 2010 and Council directed the issue to the ETC.
At the March 18, 2010 ETC meeting, a motion was made to table the issue to allow
further research on the possibility of adding bike lanes, changing the road to a park
designation and clarification of the state statutes.
Characteristics of West 66 th Street:
• Street is 28 foot wide, two lane roadway (Attachment H)
• Posted speed is 35 mph (Attachment F)
• Traffic Volumes: (Attachment G)
- 2005 6233 ADT with 85% speed of 38.1 mph (east of Southdale Road)
- 2009: 5551 ADT with 85% speed of 33.1 mph (east of Southdale Road)
2008: 4600 Average Daily (ADT) with a 85% speed of 39.1 mph (west of
Cornelia Drive)
Scenarios reviewed by staff:
Adding Bike Lanes — State statute 160.263 subd. 4. allows a reduction in the speed
limit to 25 mph on streets with signed and marked bike lanes meeting MnDOT
guidelines.
The road width is 28 feet wide with an average daily traffic (ADT) of 5551 vehicles.
According to the MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual, bike lanes should be 6 feet
wide (with a minimum continuous width of 3 feet) for the observed traffic volumes. State
Aid standards require a minimum lane width of 11 feet. That leaves only 3 feet to the
face of the curb. However, the curb is 1.5 feet wide. This produces only a 1.5 foot
minimum continuous width for bicycles. (Attachment H) This extremely narrow, 1.5 foot
lane, is not acceptable by State-Aid standards. Therefore, bike lanes are not a safe or
acceptable solution for this roadway.
Park Road Designation — State statute 169.14 subd. 5e. allows speed limits on park
roads to be lowered to 20 mph or to reduce the existing speed limits by no more than15
mph
The intent of the "speed limit on park road" statute is to establish speed limits on
roadways located completely within a park. This designation does not fit West 66th
Street as it is adjacent to a city park. The land on the south side of West 66th Street is
owned by the City but is not actively used for any park purpose. Therefore, the City
cannot use state statute "park road" language as a means to legally lower the speed
limit.
MnDOT Speed Study — State statute 169.14 subd. 5b. allows for a reduction in the
speed limit to 30 mph when the roadway is in an "urban district" as defined in the
statute.
There are two criteria that must be reviewed when using this statue.
1. Has a speed study already been conducted by MnDOT?
2. What is the definition of the roadway according to state statute 169.011?
Criteria No. 1 - MnDOT has confirmed that they do not have a record of any speed
zone authorization for West 66th Street. Staff has also exhausted our research and has
not found a speed study on file. In the absence of a speed study established by
MnDOT, the City does not need to follow the process outlined in MN Statute 169.14
Subd. 5b to request a speed study by MnDOT to lower the speed limit.
Criteria No. 2 — This section of roadway is made up of two urban districts on either end
with a unique section of causeway in the middle. It is the interpretation of staff and
MnDOT that this causeway is an extension of the urban district on either side which
makes this an urban district corridor. (Attachment I)
The City is therefore able to use the urban district definition set forth by the State
Statute 169.011 subd. 90 to set the speed limit at 30 mph on West 66th Street from
Highway 100 to Valley View road without a speed study by the State.
A resolution by City Council will be needed to authorize the 30 mph speed limit from TH
100 to Valley View Road.
Conclusion:
It is staff's recommendation to lower the speed limit to 30 mph as it is the lawful speed
for an urban district as outlined in state statue, for consistency with similar streets
within the city and as this section of roadway is adjacent to Rosland Park.
The attached resolution would be forwarded to City Council on June 1, 2010 with
the draft minutes from the May 20, 2010 ETC meeting, if so desired by the ETC.
(Attachment E)
If Council adopts the resolution and the speed limit is lowered to 30 mph staff suggests
that the Public Works and Police staff will install notification flags on the new signage as
well as place the mobile speed trailer on the corridor to notify motorists of the revised
speed limit.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Application Form (Feb. 28, 2007)
B. Staff Report to ETC (March 18, 2010)
C. Staff Report to Council (Feb. 16, 2010)
D. Traffic Safety Staff Review from March 8, 2007.
E. Draft Resolution 2010-XX
F. Posted speed limit
G. Traffic volumes
H. Bike lane sketch
I. Roadway footage sketch
Engineering Department 4801 West 50tn Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394 (952) 826-0371 www.cityofedlna.com
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan Application Form
Contact Name:
6
Address: eo—ot 4-tf
1Day/Message Phone: c5 2 qr
Today's Date: .7--/4-1/0
1 E-mail Address: 0 /
Please indicate traffic issues that concern residents in your
neighborhood:
o Speeding 0 Traffic Volumes
edestri.gn/Bicycle Safety 0 Accidents
Other: .1p, J -.7.cker 41- 114i°1-71- 0,4
Ab.5/q„„4
Suggested Traffic Calmin0 Measures (See Appendix B of the Transportation Commission Policy, please
rank, No. I is most favored):
Proposed Location from: 1} to Li, (street name)
on k,/, (street name)
io / (street name)
We, the undersigned, as residents, hereby request the evaluation of the traffic management device listed
above. We understand we may be assessed for the cost for the device.
Please list all addresses in the potentially benefited area. One signature per household or business.
Date Name (please print) Address Sis na 0 re 2
2467 ..5 -C.-,7-17 /7--S., 7,6.,2-,r.' ' .; ?- 01 til, (, _2- __
3/, / 0 7 MA4eic de ..44/.0e,esti4 66-00 co/e,-,E.CrAt Dy,',./e_._ dird' 41111.11."'
3/3 /01 itit di D ocf-rn ei 54er '1311 e-oryve-lick, C.i rd-e_ . -1 / , as_iics2
;'//o7 Lott Pete rs 1 243)S 6_01-i-LiziLit}
(
3)3 0 /t4e,..10_ re t lc ,13 Le- 0/1 Gryie. 6 kJ •Dir )1 ,/&:_i , k
3/ d ,ryucuttzt- ctetw-i.-) 619 ib Cerritato. "--le---- ..fl"Lbtiz-d-wit.., actv-e---1-.
.e . _ 3 .-..? BM e_Or .4, k . ) 6 h614 S611,4-hit.4 1 ---
Page of
Please return the completed application form to the Engineering Department at the address noted above.
1. The Minnesota Data Practices Act re q uires that we inform you of your rig hts about the private data we are req uesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This application when submitted will become public information. There is no conseq uence for refusing to supply this information.
c)
e.- •
Edina NTMP Application Form- April 2005
'I/4P
_1-/e ST A
A +lc(
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: EDINA TRANSPORATION
COMMISSION
Agenda Item Item No. IV.B
From: Jack Sullivan
Assistant City Engineer
X Action
Discussion
Information Date: March 18, 2010
Subject: 66 th Street Speed Study
ACTION REQUESTED:
Recommend to the City Council that the Mayor sign the attached resolution requesting
that the Commissioner of Transportation perform a speed study on West 66th Street
from TH 100 to Valley View Road.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:
Eight residents who live on or near 66" Street petitioned the City in 2007 to reduce the
speed limit on W. 66" Street between Valley View Road and Highway 100 from the
current posting of 35 mph to 30 mph.
Refer to the Traffic Safety Staff Review from March 8, 2007 for details regarding the
request.
Updated vehicle data is as follows:
• 2008: 4600 Average Daily (ADT) with a 85% speed of 39.1 mph
• 2009: 5551 ADT with 85% speed of 33.1 mph
Since 66th Street is a State-Aid route, the City of Edina cannot lower the speed without
an speed study performed by the Commissioner of Transportation.
ATTACHMENTS:
Please see Resolution 2010-27 and the Traffic Safety Staff Review from March 8, 2007.
Mayor & City Council
Wayne D. Houle, PE
City Engineer
February 16, 2010
Request Commissioner of
Transportation to Perform
Speed Study of W. 66th St.
from TH100 to Valley View
Rd.
Agenda Item # IV. F.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends To HRA
ZI To Council
Action Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
i--(e& IT, A
A getcLoke•04-
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation:
Authorize the Mayor to sign attached resolution requesting that the Commissioner of
Transportation perform a speed study on West 66th Street from TH100 to Valley View
Road.
Info/Background:
In the March 8, 2007, Traffic Safety Report, a recommendation was made to request
that the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) perform a speed study
along West 66t1i Street from TH100 to Valley View Road for consideration of reducing
the speed limit from 35 to 30 mph. Changing speed limits on city streets must be
authorized by MNDOT.
Attached is a copy of the March 8, 2007, Traffic Safety Report.
gAengineering\infrastructure\streets\traffic\studies\speed studies\west 66th street from th100 to valley view row:1\20100216 council
request rrform.doc
-1-74e01. 7: A
filAck Akem4-
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
Thursday, March 8, 2007
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on March 8, 2007. Staff present
included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety
Coordinator and Chief of Police.
From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed
with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or
have additional facts to present, they can be included on the March 20, 2007 Council
Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which staff recommends approval:
1. Request to restrict parking in the off-street parking area on Kellogg
Avenue just to the north of Valley View Road (northwest corner of
intersection).
Request comes from a resident on Kellogg Avenue who is concerned
with vehicles parking in this area for long periods of time, including
overnight.
The area in question is a small cut-back parking area with eight striped
parking spaces directly across from 6133 Kellogg Avenue. There are
currently no parking restrictions in this area.
The 6100 block of Kellogg Avenue is restricted to "One Hour Parking
Monday Thru Friday 8 AM to 4 PM." These restrictions apply to both
sides of the street. The small parking area in question allows customers of
the corner businesses to park for more than one hour.
The "One Hour" restriction on the 6100 block of Kellogg Avenue was
approved by the City Council on September 16, 1996, at the request of
residents via petition. Residents expressed concern that parking during the
daytime was frilly utilized on the south half of the block. Residents further
stated that many times these parked vehicles infringed on their driveways.
After further study and review by the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee,
staff recommends the following:
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 5
March 8, 2007
lacIA
Staff recommends that signs be posted in the small cut-back parking
area on the northwest corner of Kellogg Avenue and Valley View
Road with the following restrictions: "No Parking 10 PM to 8 AWL
2. Request to reduce the speed limit on W. 66th Street between Valley View
Road and Highway 100 from its current posting of 35 MPH to 30 MPH.
Request comes from a resident in the 4200 block of west 66th Street with a
petition signed by seven other homeowners. These residents are
concerned with the speed and the volume of vehicles traveling along 66th
Street at speeds of 35 MPH and higher.
Requestor states that other streets in the area ( W. 64th Street, Valley View
Road, W. 70th Street and East Frontage Road) are all posted 30 MPH.
Requestor sees no reason to have an increased speed limit along this small
stretch of roadway (speed is reduced to 30 MPH west of Highway 100).
Requestor also cites the high volume of pedestrians in the area due to its
unique location (Rosland Park, play ground, swimming pool and Lake
Cornelia), all attracting a large number of visitors, walkers, bikers and
joggers. A large number of pedestrians, mostly children, cross W. 66th
Street to get to the park. Requestor states that the sidewalk along W. 66th
Street is extremely close to the road which could possibly cause a
dangerous situation.
W. 66th Street, east of Valley View Road is a divided four lane roadway
with a posted speed limit of 30 MPH that chokes down to two lanes
immediately west of Valley View Road where the speed limit increases to
35 MPH. The average Monday thru Friday daily traffic count on this
section of W. 66th Street is 6,234 with an 85th percentile speed of 38.1
MPH. There have been nine reported traffic accidents from 2000-2005 (4-
injury and 5-property damage). No pedestrian accidents have been
reported. Statistics for 2006 to the present have not yet been obtained.
Staff checked records as far back as 1975 and could not find a date when
the 35 MPH speed limit had been established. A similar request was made
in June of 1999 and was denied (staff felt that the 35 MPH speed was
appropriate and requested that the police department step up enforcement).
W. 66th Street between Valley View Road and Highway 100 is classified
as a city "Collector" street. Changing speed limits on city streets must be
authorized by the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
After much study and review, staff recommends the following:
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 5
March 8, 2007
846
A ll/rteLot-eo.#.1-7;
Staff recommends that the City of Edina make a formal request to
the Minnesota Department of Transportation to conduct a Traffic
Speed Study on W. 66th Street between Valley View Road and
Highway 100 to determine a safe driving speed while achieving
maximum traffic flow.
3. Request to reduce the speed limit on Vernon Avenue between Villa Way
and View Lane from the current posting of 40 MPH to 30 MPH.
This request comes from two residents (one on Glengarry Pkwy. and
another on Schaefer Road). Both residents feel that the higher speed limit
on this stretch of Vernon Avenue is not needed. W. 50th Street/Vernon
Avenue has a speed limit of 30 MPH from France Avenue to Villa Way.
The speed limit increases to 40 MPH from Villa Way west to View Lane.
Speeds reduce back to 30 MPH west of View Lane. Staff has checked
records back to 1975 and was unable to find a date when this speed limit
was established. Both residents feel that the additional speed is not
needed and that it only increases accident severity.
Vernon Avenue (County Road 158) is classified as an "A" Minor Arterial
Reliever Street. It has a Monday thru Friday average daily traffic count of
10,400 vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 44.5 MPH (in 40 MPH
zone). There have been 25 reported accidents in the 40 MPH zone from
1/1/2000 to 6/17/06. Accidents are broken down as follows:
4 Injury accidents
6 Possible injury accidents
15 Property damage accidents
There were 17 accidents, during the same time period, reported in the
30 MPH zone east of Villa Way:
1 Injury accident
2 Possible injury accidents
14 Property damage accidents
There were 6 accidents, during the same time period, reported in the 30
MPH zone west of View Lane:
1 Possible injury accident
5 Property damage accidents
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 5
March 8, 2007 9/16
Requestor further states that the 40 MPH zone on Vernon Avenue is in an
area where there are hills, curves and residences with blind drives.
Requestor states that the 40 MPH portion of Vernon Avenue is only 1.3
miles long and it takes approximately 156 seconds to traverse this distance
at 30 MPH. It takes approximately 117 seconds at 40 MPH (not verified
by staff).
Requestor states that legislation enacted in 2006 (169.224) permits
"Neighborhood Electric Vehicles" to be operated on roadways with posted
speed limits of 35 MPH or less. He states that such vehicles are becoming
popular in Edina and preventing them from using Vernon Avenue poses
an unfair burden on those seeking to reduce the use of imported fuel and to
help preserve our environment.
After much study and review, staff recommends the following:
Staff recommends that the City of Edina make a formal request to the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, through Hennepin County,
to conduct a traffic speed study on Vernon Avenue between Villa Way
and View Lane to determine a safe driving speed while achieving
maximum traffic flow.
SECTION B:
Requests on which staff recommends denial of request:
1. Request to evaluate the intersection of Code Avenue and W. 56th Street
and add some type of advanced warning sign to alert drivers to a blind
intersection.
Requestor is a resident on Code Avenue who states he has witnessed near
accidents at the intersection of Code Avenue and W. 56th Street from
northbound vehicles. Requestor feels that this intersection is "blind" and
that some type of warning signs should be installed to alert drivers.
Code Avenue is a 26-foot wide city street with an average Monday thru
Friday daily traffic count of 1,096 vehicles. Code Avenue has no curb,
gutter or sidewalks. Code Avenue is a through street at the intersection of
W. 56th Street. Code Avenue has a slight downhill grade south of W. 56th
Street. There have been no reported accidents since 2000.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 5
March 8, 2007 to/
If licte(k
W. 56th Street is a 26-foot wide city street with no curb, gutter or
sidewalks. It has an average Monday thru Friday daily traffic count of 823
vehicles with an 85th percentile speed of 29.5 MPH. W. 56th Street at
Code Avenue is controlled with a two-way stop. There have been no
reported accidents since 2000.
Code Avenue at W. Se Street is a controlled intersection. Sight lines are
adequate for anyone who uses due caution while approaching from all
directions. The grade on Code Avenue to the south of W. Se Street is not
steep enough to warrant an advanced hill warning sign.
Staff recommends that no changes be made to the intersection of W.
56th Street and Code Avenue due to lack of warrants.
SECTION C:
Requests that are deferred to a later date for referred to others.
None for March 8, 2007 meeting.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 5 of 5
March 8, 2007
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-XX
REDUCING THE SPEED LIMIT ON
WEST 66TH STREET BETWEEN TH-100 AND VALLEY VIEW ROAD
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2010, the City Council requested the Edina
Transportation Commission review residents' request to reduce the speed limit from 35 mph
to 30 mph on West 66th Street between TH-100 and Valley View Road; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Transportation Commission has determined that State Statute
169.011 subd. 90 allows the City Council to set the speed limit at 30 mph because the
Minnesota Department of Transportation does not have a speed limit established for this
portion of roadway;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina,
has reduced the speed limit on West 66th Street between TH-100 and Valley View Road
from 35 mph to 30 mph.
Dated: June 1,2010
Attest:
Debra A. fVlangen, City Clerk
James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of June 1, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20
City Clerk
4
1.4.n • " 4'1
J. t '
97 /71
Computatiyns For Sheet of
;5+; A) 01)Rc cyt "3:)i Ake itif,knotEy 17.5..at've.td Date ,V/LYfro
Gc rt,.u:r1
•
rE)
'1/51 Project Name W. C6 ±L° 54tee-1L Improvement No
):40 Contract No
0
. 4
re.rtP. '
4,307W004iTi. •
e
•
-
•
• ....t.10,"
AU •
•
T "Ft
• ' ' I
e'
- . -
tit
s'404) ;or
11? Pi'
• L.,
3 '_'..•tht!Isci,
,' 'itt•
#1....,....4 , .1
, . 40, It, ' ; , ! ;' n ! , I, ! •
ti .. ii.•:.Lii LW/
. .
,,.._
FRANCE AVE S,_
•
via*. k,
?f,1/4). 'ft . •
444 ..407'7n ,:..
, 11.1g d.';'•• •
iNtto t
, .-,741107,-r-.4•44fr.777r...71,1174...
515
1 );
• ' ' . -• - . 1 "'"44`..'-w•O'...• ':-,•.• 'it-, o,. ' ', '-' :IN. „I' ;''. P;
''-).--i - 's.:--4-::;1-."-.
' • '''Y r ... -- •,' ....ea ' - ' _, 4 ii 1 -', 1 4 ',
'c' ' '''' . -'1`.44 :1n• 0: -- ' ' • I •
, • .1' :L...T,t `
4.n • '., ' ' • ‘ " I
. , n •• / ,!','..; /I."... ..i. ' .. ' f' • -:f-•,-,-:-.1.,:1;i1,! • " — . II° ./ . , , , ''..;e. ' '.' 1 1:
...f:',0 .'44*. :- ' ' ' i I; 4344?.1 ,
4, V''',..‘.''''±.',' .•'•,•4:' — 4,4 -., - Ai i. I -:,:. '7 „ ' .;,P t
••1•-
97,1
N.) o
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: EDINA TRANSPORATION
COMMISSION
Agenda Item Item No. IV.B
From: Jack Sullivan „,
Assistant City Engineer
X Action
Discussion
Information Date: May 20, 2010
Subject: CVS Pharmacy Transportation Review (69th St. and York Ave.)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review the attached transportation impact (TIA) analysis submitted by Spack
Consulting dated May 14, 2010 and review memos dated March 31, 2010 and May 7,
2010 from WSB and Associates.
Staff and WSB have reviewed the TIA dated May 14, 2010 and believe the development
team has met the requirements of the TIA and review memos. The minor comments as
outlined in WSB's May 7th memo have been addressed in the current TIA.
If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending
that the Transportation Impact Analysis for CVS Pharmacy at 69th and York does
not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:
This site is located in the southeast corner of West 69th Street and York Avenue. The
site is currently a vacant lot that has changed proposed uses of the last few years. City
of Edina staff and the ETC have reviewed the following transportation studies:
• November 2006: 85 unit senior apartments and 39,000 sq ft retail space
• April 2008: 114 market rate apartments and 18,000 sq ft retail space
The current proposal is a modification to the April 2008 proposal by switching out the
two retail buildings (totaling 18,000 sq ft) with one building (CVS Pharmacy) totaling just
over 13,000 sq ft. The CVS pharmacy will share the surface parking lot with the current
apartment building to the east. The CVS is proposed to have two drive thru windows.
The development team, including Spack Consulting, first discussed this modification
with City staff in July of 2009. The November 2006 and April 2008 traffic studies were
completed by Wenck Engineering. The current traffic engineering firm is Spack
Consulting. The initial meeting covered the following issues:
• The Transportation Impact Analysis form was not in existence during the first two
reviews and would be required for this review
• How to expand upon the previous traffic studies.
• Analyze trip generation of the proposed use
• Integration of trips destined for the apartments via the shared parking lot
• No — Build and Build Level of Services (LOS) at the intersections of
- W. 69th Street and York Ave
- Right In / Right Out off of York Avenue
- Right Out from the drive thru window
- Full shared intersection on W. 69th Street
The findings of the TIA are as follows:
• The final TIA report shows consistent LOS at all the studied intersections in the
no-build and build scenarios, therefore not adversely affecting the adjacent street
operations.
• The TIA also showed some area for improvement to the signal timing at West
691" and York Avenue. This signal is owned and operated by Hennepin County.
The development team will work with Hennepin County after the retail store is
open to optimize the signal timing.
• The site layout replaces the sidewalk along the East and North sides of the
parcel. The building is also moved closer to York Avenue to enhance pedestrian
movements.
• Most trips to and from the pharmacy will be via passenger vehicle. However, the
store is on a major Metro Transit bus line and store will be posting bus schedules
and looking for other ways to enhance mass transit.
WSB .b. Infrastructure • Engineering • Planning • Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
& .4ssociates. Suite #300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763 541-4800
Fax: 763 541-1700
Memorandum
To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer
City of Edina
From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE
Transportation Engineer
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Date: March 31, 2010
Re: CVS Pharmacy — 69th Street at York Avenue
Traffic Impact Study Review
City of Edina
WSB Project No. 1686-02
As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a
proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. This site
was previously reviewed for development in late 2006 and again in 2008. The 2008 proposal
included a 114 unit apartment building and 18,050 square feet of general retail space. The apartment
building was constructed and is currently partially occupied. The general retail component has now
been changed to the proposed CVS pharmacy.
Based on our review of the previous studies and the current Traffic Impact Study we offer the
following comments.
1. The Traffic Impact Study should document the findings of the previous studies
including the Cities reviews and indicate what improvements and / or
recommendations from those studies and reviews were incorporated in to the CVS
proposal.
2. With the analysis of existing conditions a discussion of the available bus routes is
included. A map showing the relationship of the bus routes with the bus stops and the
CVS site should be included.
3. The existing Level of Service (LOS) analysis section indicates that a movement LOS
of F is acceptable when the overall LOS is at a D. Unfortunately, this is occurring at
the 69th Street and York Avenue intersection with an overall LOS C. The text
indicates this could be mitigated with signal timing changes. The results of the timing
changes should be documented, not only for the existing conditions but also for the
future 2011 build and no-build conditions. This signal is controlled by Hennepin
County and, therefore the County will ultimately be responsible for the final approval
of any signal timing plans.
CAWSMEdineNCVS Review.doc
Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan
City of Edina
March 31, 2010
Page 2 of 2
4. The site traffic forecasting section and table 4.1 includes the vacant 34 apartments in
the existing building. The text indicates that the No-Build volumes were adjusted to
account for these trips. How were these trips assigned to the roadway network? How
many of the trips were assigned through the CVS site driveways?
5. The text indicates that the pass-by trips were assumed to be 35% of the pharmacy
trips. It also indicates that the City gave the direction to use this figure. That is not
entirely true. City staff did agree that the pass-by percentage could be assumed
because it was used in the pervious studies. However, it was actually the Cities
recommendation to use no pass-by trips to represent a worst case condition. The study
should include a description of pass-by trips indicating that they are just redistributed
trips from the existing traffic stream. The total number of trips entering and exiting
the site should not be reduced. It is unclear how these trips were accounted for. A
column in Table 4.1 showing the total trips entering and exiting the site should be
included.
6. Figures 4.2 through 4.5 show the site traffic volumes. These volumes do not seem to
add up to the values in Table 4.1. Please clarify how the apartments (item 4 above)
and the pass-by trips (item 5 above) are figured into these calculations.
7. The forecasted 2011 analysis indicates that there will be approximately 10 vehicles on
69th Street doing u-turns and that this will not cause any problems. How was this
determined? Encouraging u-turns at a 2-way stop controlled intersection is a safety
concern. That same section indicates that there will be a weaving movement of
approximately 10 vehicles from the right-in / right-out on York Avenue to the left
turn lane to go west on 69th Street. This also is a safety concern. It should be
documented how these movements will not cause any safety issues. Also, the existing
crash data should be reviewed to determine if any existing conditions are showing
any safety issues.
8. Should the traffic volumes for the 2011 no-build or build conditions change, the
analysis should be revised.
9. The analysis indicates that there are opportunities to improve the traffic signal timing
at 69th Street and York Avenue to mitigate the deficient staking on York Avenue. The
signal timing improvements should be documented as discussed in item 3 above.
10. The parking analysis should be defined better. Are the existing 13 stalls from the
apartments included in the 90 stalls on the CVS site?
11. The Travel Demand Management section needs to be discussed in more detail. The
developer needs to determine additional ways how they will encourage use of
alternative transportation modes. Providing a bike rack is just one way.
Based on these comments and my review of the Traffic Impact Study, additional information and
analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made.
A
WSB
n 111111.11. Infrastructure • Engineering • Planning • Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Acsociales. Inc. Suite #300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763 541-4800
Fax: 763 541-1700
Memorandum
To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer
City of Edina
Front: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE
Transportation Engineer
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Date: May 7, 2010
Re: CVS Pharmacy — 69" Street at York Avenue
Revised Traffic Impact Study Review
City of Edina
WSB Project No. 1686-02
As requested, we have reviewed the revised Traffic Impact Study prepared by Spack Consulting for a
proposed CVS pharmacy located in the southeast quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. The
Traffic Impact Study dated March 25th, 2010 was reviewed and comments were outlined in a review
memo dated March 31st, 2010. The developer and his consultant met with City Staff and WSB and
reviewed the comments. Spack Consulting subsequently prepared the revised Traffic Impact Study
dated April 20th, 2010.
Based on our review of the previous study and the current revised Traffic Impact Study we offer
the following comments.
1. In general the comments from the March 31st review memorandum have been
addressed.
2. In the Executive Summary section under the primary findings of the study, items i
and iv seem to be conflicting. One indicates an overall LOS of C for all intersections
and one indicates that the LOS at 69th Street and York would be at a LOS D with the
retiming. This should be clarified.
3. In the Projected Traffic section under Non-site Traffic Forecasting, the 34 vacant
apartments are discussed. This should be further clarified how many of those trips are
actually using the CVS site access. It just indicates that the majority would use
Xerxes Avenue.
4. It is still unclear how the site traffic in Figures 4.2 — 4.5 add up to that shown in Table
4.1. These values should be the same, especially now that the pass-by trips have been
eliminated.
CAWSBWdina CVS Revised Review.doc
Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan
City of Edina
May 7, 2010
Page 2 of 2
5. How does the retiming of the 69th Street and York Avenue signal impact the queuing
analysis? Table 5.2 should be expanded to include these values.
6. The Crash Analysis discussion should be expanded to include a table or crash
diagram outlining the location, type and severity of the crashes.
7. The Travel Demand Management section indicates that CVS will post bus schedules
near its doors. This should be included as a recommended improvement in the
Conclusions and Recommendations section.
Based on these comments and my review of the Traffic Impact Study it can be concluded that the
CVS Pharmacy proposed development will not have a significant impact on existing or future
traffic operations adjacent to the site. It is therefore my recommendation that the Traffic Impact
Study be approved with minor clarifications discussed above.
1 I Project Name:
CVS WEST 69TH STREET _
phmgmacy
SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES
MODIFIED RIGHT ENTRANCE
SEC
YORK AVENUE SOUTH
>2.
MODIFY EXISTING . - FULL ;SHARED
I. 5TIBACTSSL Front balding setback = 35 ft Front parking setheek =
Side budding setback = 35 ft Side parking setboak =
Rear building setback = 35 It Rear rear setback =
2. ZONING
Existing zoning =
3. PARKING SUIAMARY
Surface regular stalls = 86 Surfoce handicapped stalls = 4
20 ft
10 ft
10 ft THERE ARE NO SIGNS WITHIN THE
INTERSECTION TO INDICATE THAT U-TURNS ARE ILLEGAL AND
WEST 69TH STREET PCO-3 Proposed zoning = POD-3 MEET & MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER
MEET & MATCH EXISTING CURB & CUTTER
CL
CVS CS #52767
CVS STORE # 5788
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN
i BENCHES MEET & MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK--_.!
4. AREA/DENSITY
Told Plat Areo = 69 499 S0 FI or 180 AF = 1000
Impervious Surface Areo Excluding Building = 41,636 Sq.Ft. or 0.95 AR = 60.03
Building Surfoce Areo = 13,013 Sq.FL or aso As = 18.80
Pertious Surface Areo = 14,850 Sq.FL or 0.34 Ac. = 21.23
5. All paving, concrete curb, gutter and sidewolk MINI be furnished and Installed
in occordonce with the datalls shown per sheet C8-1 and the requirements of
the City. See Landscape ond Architectural Pions for any
additional hordscope applicotions.
S. The aty Department of Engineering ond Bonding Inspections Dept. ond the
construction engineer shall be notified ot Rost 48 hours prior to ony work
within the street right of way (sidewalk. street or driverrar)
7. Minnesota State statute requires notification per 'Gopher State One Coll° prior
to commencing any grotfing, excavation or underground work.
R=2.0 I Developer Name:
4
351.04
of - T A IA P ED COLORED CONCRETE
FALSE ENTRANCE VELMEIR N89° CINUMENT SIGN
COMPANIES
Perinea In De:hi:potent
1 Professional &entices:
LOUCKS Drat age 'linty 111 Per
• c. N 11 597 Niq
13313L OSBL 14 " B BL BSBL B BL
8. See contract specifications for any removal details.
D. Any sign or fixtures removed with in the right of way or es port of the site
work shell be replaced by the eontractor in accordance with the City
requirement. The contractor shall preserve and maintain any existing
street lights and troffic signs per the requirements of the City.
ASSOCRTES
BEAM, • Cool Engineering • Land Suee,ing
Lanticc., Atchileclue • Ensieunner.1
PROPOSED
CVS
10. The contractor shall be required to obtain all permits from the City as
required for at vrork with the street and public right of Ivey
A significont potion of site improvements not shown on this sheet ore descrRed
and provided in further detail on the Architecture' and Landscope Plans. This
includes landscaping, lighting and other fixtures.
12. 8612 concrete curb ond gutter shall be installed at the edge of dl common
drives and poexing lots.
720011endoc4 Lane -5,7r 1CO
minne,tolit.tfinnesaa 55369
Telephone: 17631424-550S
Fax7 1743N24-5822
ts,,,,thtdtsAssoctoostron 180000 ph@FMCy
TYPE A - 13,013 sI.
96.-10" X 137'-6"
80 STALLS REQUIRED
90 STALLS PROVIDED
FEE=878.50
8=5.0 R=5.0
R=2.0 0, 8=2.0 PROPOSED CONCRETE " WALK
li=10.0 ta R=5.0 R=2.0 4 R=2.0 13. Construction Note.
® Pedestrian ramps shall be provided ot the locations shown and no shown
per the landscape site pions.
0 The contractor shell saw-cut bituminous and concrete pavements os requited
per the specifications. Remove existing curb and gutter and install 13512
concrete curb ond gutter.
I4. See Sheets C3-1 and C4-1 for grading and utilities.
15. All concrete curb and gutter 8612. CityR Standard Plates. (See Detail Sheet).
16. The Intent of the proposed construction Is to preserve os much of the existing
street pavement as possible, and to mil and overloy. Removed pavement areas
ond patching than be installed per pavement section provided per Defog Sheet
17. Wheel stops sholl be 6' high is 9' wide ond 84° long with air entroined concrete
2500 psi minimum compressive strength. The comets shall be chornfered and
drainage slots underneath Provide holes and steel dowels for anchoring. Attach to
povement with not less than 2 golvantzed steel dowels embedded in concrete at
one-third points.
R=20.0
HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT R=15.0
NORR MI Ilr
111111111111.
111111111111Eik
111111•111Er -
11Nroianit I,
110•111111111MIEMIIIIIIMIA110•11111Ura11113MIMMilimaii•Lliii_ial ei 1111111111111111111114111111TUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMUILIII!1111•••••11111111111111111111111111,1
1•111111111Filll
11111111111EMMI
i
INSIMIM it7l -2'CL CURB STOP; (TYP).-/ 13 1
1111M11111111111, d C. & ' A(...7. 11111111E•11111 ;
HANDICAP RAMI:
ISO 20.0 32.9,4 20.0 24.0 20.0
CADD Qualification:
ie•
ir,ces...151ar b peject
...1epaxileabobuin.q.arineC4906...)
color Access Esm't Per Doc. No 1 CURBI STOP I Submittal:
SO 510 NM PLAAIREVIEW
R97,77,1
HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS
(SEE DETAIL SHEET C8-1I
4/23/10 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SLIBSSITTAL
BSSL BSBL
NUMBER OF PARKING
STALLS WITHIN ROW 11 MEET & MATCH 11 EXISTING CURB & GUTTER
15 DUMPSTER &UPRIGHT COMPACTOR WiROOf SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAILS
EXISTING DITUN AP LIOUS -
PS8 PS81 PSBL ,Ti 1581
WEST 156 62
,
SAWCUT PAVEMENT I MEET AND MATCH EXISTING ;PAVEMENT
R=20 A
1,..-7fork East Pedefio1 Ac ess F.sm' Per Doc, No. 452- 930
21'5 --r-3 ,3A
L11 ,Vofir-. EX STING SIDEPAL f4OTIC I Professional Si gnature:
N89°54'25"E 194.81 \_PROPOSED CONCRETE PYLON SIGN WALK EXTENSION. I herd, eentereng Mrs pLen. ereermennn Wed.. reeemed by me or wrier my errem toys* ene
team 6o9 Linens. Prenteskng BrArneer 0.60 OrS ten
9441e of Wren..
SIDEWALK EXISTING MEET dr MATCH
York West Pedestrian
Access Esm 't Per Doc. No
Vicki I. Van Oeil - PE
41352
Licen Nre Dare
1 Quality Control:
WBS WBS
rAmne Bre Anne tme 01/10
1
CO-I
0.1
C1-2
0-1
0.2
cur
C6-I
11.1
- --
NORTH
20 40
I Sheet Title.
SITE PLAN SCALE IN FEET
CALL BEFORE YOU 0101
04
/
23
/
2
0
1
0 9:
14
A
M
Gopher State One Call I Project No.:
Loucks Project No 06416 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002
'TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166
I Sheet No.:
C2-1
SOUTH ELEVATION
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
TAG MATERIAL / DESCRPIDN ION STYLE CAT. NO. COLOR NOTES
CAT 550 PREIBER SYSTal 137 SLCOUT 1.5 RACK-0520
MEDIUM YELLOW SEE SPEOFEAllali
EFS STO PREMIER SYSTEM 137 SLCOUT 1.5 NA05-0001
RAF-TNT& SEE SPEN50A-110N
MICR VENEER PINE HALL 131005 WIRRAL CVS RED
ISORTAR SPEC: 050-113 BY
CINSOUDATED BRICK
MANG SUPPUES INC.
PEWIT BENJAMIN MOORE PANT TO MATCH
EFS 'Er
PAINT BENJANN MOORE PUNT TO MATCH
EMS '12'
PAINT BENJAMIN MOORE PAINT TO MATCH
BMX 'Er
PANT MONSOON MOORE HATCH OFTU
YELLOW Tr FOR AU. PIPE BOLONDS
AGOG STORDRONT SEE SPECS SEE SPECS SEM A/1002ED
ALUISIAN
C.) ALUM AUTO/ABC DOOR STANLEY SEE SPECS CLEM MOORED
ALLIUNUU
LEGEND
RE IMERICR 10001 50002010
ROIL
MACE LINDEN SEPARATE PERUIT
WEST ELEVATION - YORK AVENUE SOUTH
SCALE: 1/8" . 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/8"
/__(:)(M,E1AL, 03.1%
METAL CCITING
(ISP)
NORTH ELEVATION - WEST 69TH STREET
SCALE: 1/8"
EAST ELEVATION VELMEIR
COMPANIES
Partners In Development
SCALE: 1/8" • 1'-0"
/IMO 1111111111111
719 Griswold Street
Suite 1000
DeIrek, MI 48226
W.W.1301,C0111
,
i 0 flit
H t F kv
k:,,,.......,.„.....,,,.......„_ V.1'65..h St.,„_ - (-1 I '••••.--P . 3 • Fl i IL .,.. 1
mit, s, ...„ . 4.--„W .S6t.17 SI 53 I 4-- .4
.j ti - 1
44
. ir ..
i
•
Riatiold
-
w68u,s,
United
a He
moiety
'1-17
reiff 1,1
§
I ;
31,1
e
..31 1'. .444- • < 1 e2116 I
ri 4
liezeiten Re
- . 1 •
W75151 704h 54
4,
040.4. 15,71siSt'l,
W7117St'' .! •
•Ve'W Ma:MA= W 72nd ,
.111.1%
SP a Ck
THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY
V Hb
Traffic Impact Study
CVS Pharmacy
Edina, MN
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
—27`-'74,d-i4t/
Micigael P. Spack, RE.
License No. 40936
Date: May 14, 2010
By:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction and Summary 1
2. Proposed Development 3
3. Analysis of Existing Conditions 6
4. Projected Traffic 14
5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis 30
6. Conclusions and Recommendations 35
7. Appendix 36
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 — Location Map 3
Figure 21 — Site Plan 5
Figure 3.1 — Existing Transportation System 9
Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 10
Figure 3.3 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 11
Figure 3.4— Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes 12
Figure 3.5— Existing Daily Volumes 13
Figure 4.1 — Trip Distribution 17
Figure 4.2— Weekday AM Peak Hour Volume Due to Development 18
Figure 4.3 — Weekday PM Peak Hour Volume Due to Development 19
Figure 4.4 — Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volume Due to Development 20
Figure 4.5 — Daily Volume Due to Development 21
Figure 4.6 — 2011 No-Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 22
Figure 4.7 — 2011 No-Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 23
Figure 4.8 — 2011 No-Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes 24
Figure 4.9 — 2011 No-Build Daily Volumes 25
Figure 4.10 — 2011 Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 26
Figure 4.11 — 2011 Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 27
Figure 4.12 — 2011 Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes 28
Figure 4.13 — 2011 Build Daily Volumes 29
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)1 8
Table 4.1 — Trip Generation 16
Table 5.1 — 2011 Level of Service (LOS)1 30
Table 5.2 — 2011 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results1 32
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study i York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
1. Introduction and Summary
a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives
CVS Pharmacy is proposing to build an approximately 13,013
square foot pharmacy on the vacant southeast quadrant of York
Avenue South and West 69th Street in Edina, MN. The existing
114 unit York Place apartment building east of the proposed
development will share the surface parking lot with CVS Pharmacy.
The purpose of this report is to determine if the proposed pharmacy
will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system in the
near term and to recommend mitigation measures if necessary.
The study objectives are:
i. Document how the adjacent existing transportation system
operates.
ii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate
in 2011 if there is no development.
iii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate
in 2011 with full development of the site.
iv. Recommend improvements if needed.
b. Executive Summary
The development is proposed to contain a 13,013 square foot
pharmacy with two drive-thru windows and 90 parking stalls. The
eastern edge of the parking lot will have an additional 17 parking
stalls owned by the York Place apartment building adjacent to the
east side of the site. After the pharmacy is built, the apartment
building and pharmacy will share the expanded lot and use the
same driveways. The pharmacy is anticipated to be fully
operational by 2011.
The scope of this traffic study follows the City of Edina's
Transportation Impact Analysis Initiation and Review Policy. Based
on discussions with City of Edina staff, the following intersections
are analyzed in this study:
i. York Avenue/Existing northbound Right-in/Right-out
driveway south of 69tn Street (the driveway is currently
blocked with a fence) — Intersection 1
ii. York Avenue/69th Street — Intersection 2
69th Street/Proposed eastbound Right-out intersection which
aligns closely with the Key Cadillac westbound Right-
in/Right-out driveway on the north side of 69th Street —
Intersection 3
iv. 69th Street/Existing full access driveways for Key Cadillac-
York Place — Intersection 4
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 1 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
The principal findings of this study are:
i. The York Avenue/69th Street intersection (Intersection 2)
currently operates acceptably at LOS C and will continue to
operate acceptably at LOS C in both the 2011 No-Build and
Build scenarios.
ii. The stop sign controlled study intersections on 69th Street
(Intersections 3 & 4), as well as the CVS Pharmacy driveway
on York Avenue (Intersection 1) will operate acceptably at
LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or better in
the 2011 No-Build and Build scenarios.
iii. The maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak
hours will not spill out of the turn lane or back up past the
CVS right-out driveway (Intersection 3) on the eastbound
approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac-Apartment
Driveway intersection (Intersection 4). Approximately ten
eastbound to westbound u-turns will be made during each
peak hour at Intersection 4 and are not anticipated to cause
any problems.
iv. The 2011 Build study peak hour northbound to westbound
queues at York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2) will spill
out of the left turn lane and back up past the CVS right-
in/right-out driveway on the northbound approach to the
intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday
peak hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of
these peak hours will be turning right onto York Avenue from
the right-in/right-out driveway (Intersection 1) and then
crossing lanes to get into the northbound to westbound left
turn lane at the York Avenue/69th Street intersection
(Intersection 2). This is a low volume of vehicles and is not
expected to cause crash problems. Furthermore, there are
opportunities to improve the signal timing plan at the York
Avenue/69th Street intersection (Intersection 2) to minimize
stacking while still maintaining an acceptable Level of
Service at the intersection.
In order to accommodate all modes of transportation after the
proposed CVS Pharmacy is built, the following improvements are
recommended:
i. Install bicycle racks near the doors of the building.
ii. Post transit schedules in their entrances.
iii. Install sidewalks as shown on the site plan.
iv. Work with Hennepin County to re-time the traffic signal at the
York Avenue/69th Street intersection (Intersection 2) after
the CVS Pharmacy is fully operational.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 2 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
_
..esdiii; FE,e,
lame.*H,f
, Gold'"en
,PleY
c.. E l H
t.
n01:1;e1610111.
Tenit
.St Louis Park
1.4 s.SouthdAtt'
Joffamon
Park
Southdalo Shopping Conro,
Study Area
Proposed Site
vi 7o. tr2
•
0.14'141 ;4
2. Proposed Development
a. Site Location
The project site is located just southeast of the Southdale Mall on
the southeast quadrant of the York Avenue/69th Street intersection
in Edina, MN (see Figure 2.1).
Figure 2.1 - Location Map
b. Land Use and Intensity
The proposed development will consist of a 13,013 square foot
pharmacy building with 90 parking stalls. The CVS Pharmacy
parking lot and driveways will be shared by York Place apartments.
The proposed 90 stall parking lot will abut 17 existing York Place
parking stalls (providing 107 stalls in the shared lot). The shared
parking lot will be used by visitors at York Place, however residents
will use the underground parking garage accessed from Xerxes
Avenue east of the site.
c. Site Plan
See Figure 2.2 for the proposed site plan. The plan shows the
concrete sidewalk planned along the south, west, and north borders
of the site.
d. Development History, Phasing, and Timing
The CVS Pharmacy is planned to be built and fully operational by
2011. This proposed CVS Pharmacy is part of the York Place site
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 3 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
previously approved, however the 13,013 square foot pharmacy
building is different than the 18,000 retail center originally
envisioned on the site. The apartment complex is already built and
approximately 75% leased. As part of the apartment project, the
main access on 69th Street (Intersection 4) was redesigned (left
turn lanes were extended and the medians were modified). These
safety enhancements will be shared by the proposed CVS
Pharmacy through the parking lot it will share with York Place
apartments.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 4 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Nr ...11.113.17 ELT
ru-
riZIAT;' ;.91,M2r. .-11r•
',PIO MI' :MEI EMI MI MO IMM
4 41e,
($7
L
- .
14 eye Nu 4,2 rlq
Me3.5425T z
—
Figure 2.2
Site Plan
THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY
KEY CADILLAC
WEST 69111 STREET
= SIDEWALK
Site Plan prepared for The Velmeir Companies by Loucks Associates
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 5 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
3. Analysis of Existing Conditions
a. Transportation Network Characteristics
York Avenue is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31. It is
designated as a "B" Minor Arterial and a Secondary Bicycle Route
in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. York Avenue is a four-
lane divided roadway with a 35 mph speed limit near the proposed
site. Turn lanes are provided on York Avenue at major
intersections and sidewalks are provided along both sides of the
street.
York Avenue is a significant bus route for Metro Transit, connecting
to the Southdale Transit Center. A bus stop is located on the west
side of York Avenue south of 69th Street across from the proposed
site. A bus stop is also located on the east side of York Avenue
north of 69th Street approximately 400 feet from the proposed site.
These bus stops are served by Metro Transit Routes 6, 538, 539,
and 578.
69th Street is City of Edina Municipal State Aid Route 159. It is
designated as a "B" Minor Arterial and a Primary Bicycle Route in
the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. 69th Street is a four-lane
divided roadway with a 35 mph speed limit near the proposed site.
Turn lanes are provided on 691h Street at major intersections and a
sidewalk is provided on the south side of the street near the
proposed site.
Existing traffic control, speed limits, bus stops, sidewalks and travel
lanes are shown on Figure 3.1 for each study intersection.
b. Traffic Volumes
Based on direction from city staff, the turning movement volumes
were counted at the study intersections during the following times:
• Weekday a.m. peak hour (between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.)
• Weekday p.m. peak hour (between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.)
• Saturday midday peak hour (between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00
p.m.)
The peak hour turning movement volumes were counted at the
existing study intersections in March 2010 and are shown at the
end of this section in Figures 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4. The turning
movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the
Appendix. The data included in the Appendix also includes
pedestrian counts, which were low during the study period (less
than 25 pedestrians per crossing during the peak hour). The
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 6 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
LOS A
LOS D = Acceptable
.!
,
LOS F = Unacceptable-'
Source: City of
San Jose, CA
existing daily traffic volumes for York Avenue and 69th Street
(Intersection 2) are shown in Figure 3.5. The daily volume data is
also included in the Appendix.
c. Level of Service
An intersection capacity analysis was
conducted for the existing intersections per the
Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are
assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for
the peak hour of traffic based on the number of
lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and
traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A)
represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions)
while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents
heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions).
LOS D at intersections is typically considered
acceptable in the Twin Cities region. Individual
movements are also assigned LOS grades.
One or more individual movements typically
operate at LOS F when the overall intersection
is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures
on the left represent some of the LOS grades
(from a signal controlled intersection in San
Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the
overall intersection operation, not individual
movements.
The LOS results for the existing study hours are
shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control
and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.1. The existing
turning movement volumes from Figures 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 were
used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done
using SYNCHROTM software utilizing the City of Edina's existing
model. The City of Edina's existing SYNCHROTM model was used
for the York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection and the
driveway intersections (Intersections 1, 3 & 4) were added to the
model. The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for
individual movements, are included in the Appendix.
The York Avenue/69th Street
(Intersection 2) intersection currently
operates acceptably at LOS C, however
the eastbound left turn movement
operates at LOS F during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday
peak hours indicating the existing signal timing plans could be
improved. If the signal timing plans are optimized, the intersection
All study intersections
currently operate
acceptably.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 7 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
can operate at LOS C or better with each movement operating at
LOS D or better (see the Appendix for optimized LOS results). The
unsignalized intersections on 69th Street operate acceptably at LOS
A with each approach operating at LOS A.
Table 3.1 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)1
Int. #
1
Intersection
York Ave/CVS-
Apartment Rt-in-Rt-out
Weekday Weekday Sat.
A.M. P.M. Midday
(n/a - driveway is currently not
connected to apartment parking lot)
York Ave/69th St B (d) IIIZMIIIUIEMIIII
A a A a 3 69th St/Ke Cadillac Dvw A a
4 69th St/Key Cadillac —
Apartment D vw A (a) A (a) A (a)
The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. The second letter
(in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement.
d. Data Sources
The sources for the data sited above are:
• Turning movement counts — Traffic Data Inc. (March 2010)
• Daily traffic volumes — Traffic Data Inc. (July 2009)
• Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting
• Site Plan — Prepared by Loucks Associates for The Velmeir
Companies
• SYNCHROTM Model — Existing signal timing plans and traffic
volumes for intersections not studied in this report provided by
City of Edina.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 8 York Avenue/691h Street - Edina, MN
C0
Co
-0
/ Intersection 4
cc
Intersection 2 \
West 69th St 441P
North
No Scale
SIDEWALK
(Routes 6,538, BUS e
539, 578) STOP
Intersection 1
Iii
tExisting Driveway
Temporarily closed
Lfl
M
O BUS (Routes 6,538,
STOP 539, 578) Co
Intersection 3
Spack
HIE TRAINC STUDY COMPANY
Figure 3.1
Existing Transportation System
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study
9 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
t North
No Scale
Am 10
.1 0 41NOWN 110 .11 Its I-1
4.1
0
0
Existing Driveway
Temporaril Closed
West 69th St
Spack
'THE lkAi IIC SIUDY COMPANY
Figure 3.2
Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 10 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North
No Scale
256 Am*
Existing Driveway
Temporaril Closed
West 69th St
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 11 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Spack
IHk IIAF-IC S1UDY COMPANY
Figure 3.3
Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes
North
No Scale
226111)
55 n 41.
156
CD CO
0 ) 4n 87 N Oa N
Existing Driveway
Temporaril Closed
West 69th St
Spa. ck
IkAFf IC SIUUY COMPANY
Figure 3.i
Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volume
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 12 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
SP a Ck
lkAffIC S1UUY COMPANY
Figure 3.5
Existing Daily Volumes
North
No Scale
CD
West 69th St
4:10
4,200 10,300
Existing Driveway
Temporarily Closed
Legend
•
July 2009 Daily Traffic Volumes
Source: Traffic Data Inc.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 13 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
4. Projected Traffic
a. Site Traffic Forecasting
A trip generation study was done at six CVS Pharmacies in the
Twin Cities during the Fall of 2009 to document their trip generation
characteristics. A summary memorandum from that study is
included in the Appendix. City staff have authorized the use of that
data for the proposed pharmacy in lieu of using data from the ITE
Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The resultant trip generation is
shown in Table 4.1 at the end of this section.
The directional orientation of the generated traffic was provided by
city staff and is shown in Figure 4.1. This distribution pattern is
consistent with the York Place Traffic Study.
The traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the
area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The
traffic volumes added to the study roadways for each study period
through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5 at the
end of this section.
b. Non-site Traffic Forecasting
Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2011 scenario by
applying a 0.48% compounded annual growth rate to the existing
traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20-year
growth factor of 1.1 the Mn/DOT State Aid office has assigned to
Hennepin County.
Traffic generated by the 34 vacant apartments was added to these
factored forecasts based on the trip generation (as shown in Table
4.1) and the trip distribution (as shown in Figure 4.1). These
volumes will largely access the resident garage via it's driveway on
Xerxes Avenue. Approximately 25% of the trips from these
apartments are expected to use the combined CVS/York Place
Apartment driveways.
The resultant 2011 No-Build forecasts for each study period are
shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9 at the end of this section.
c. Total Traffic
Traffic forecasts were developed for each study period in the year
2011 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the
proposed development (as shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5) to the
2011 No-Build volumes (as shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9). The
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 14 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
No-Build volumes at the site driveways were adjusted during this
process to account for the apartment residents and visitors who
would be able to use the access on York Avenue through the
shared parking lot in the Build scenario. Based on the trip
distribution pattern shown in Figure 4.1, it is assumed
approximately a fifth of the apartment vehicles using the existing
driveway on 69" Street (Intersection 4) will shift to the right-in/right-
out intersection on York Avenue (Intersection 1) after the proposed
project is constructed. The resultant 2011 Build forecasts are
shown in Figures 4.10 through 4.13.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 15 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Spack
'TI1L 1RAFFIC COT FANY
Table 4.1
Trip Generation
PHARMACY/DRUGSTORE WITH DRIVE-THRU
PERIOD DEVELOPMENT
UNITS (GFA)
QUANTITY DAILY
RATE
ENTER
PERCENT
EXIT NEW TRIPS
PERCENT ENTER EXIT
Daily 1,000 GFA 13.0 87.95 50% 50% 572 572
AM Peak Hour 1,000 GFA 13.0 3.99 51% 49% 26 25
PM Peak Hour 1,000 GFA 13.0 8.94 49% 51% 57 59
Saturday/Mid-Day Peak Hour 1,000 GFA 13.0 7.63 48% 52% 48 52
APARTMENT ITE CODE 220
PER IOD DEVELOPMENT
UNITS (GFA)
QUANTITY DAILY
RATE
ENTER
PERCENT
EXIT NEW TRIPS
PERCENT ENTER EXIT
Daily Dwelling Units 34.0 6.65 50% 50% 113 113
AM Peak Hour Dwelling Units 34.0 0.51 20% 80% 3 14
PM Peak Hour Dwelling Units 34.0 0.62 65% 35% 14 7
Saturday/Mid-Day Peak Hour Dwelling Units 34.0 0.52 50% 50% 9 9
NOTES:
1. GFA = Gross Floor Area
2. Apartment trip generation rates based on "Trip Generation", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition.
3. Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Thru based on trip generation rate analysis by TDI
4. A.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7 and 9 a.m.).
5. P.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4 and 6 p.m.).
6. Saturday Trip Generation is for the peak hour of generator (one hour between 11 and 1 p.m.).
7. Directional Distribution was not provided for Apartment on Saturday, but 50/50 was assumed.
8. The 34 apartment dwelling units are currently vacant but assumed to be occupied by 2011 and are included in the No-Build.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 16 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Legend
Trip Distributions for Pharmacy/Drugstore
Trip Distributions for Apartment
Southdalo Shopping Contor 4 Jofforso
Par<
stira.authclu Ceunter
4/ 691h St
T
4
t t
V
' ., , Seuthdate %
, - ,1, ,4 I
I , - / Parking
.._ I -
r .. NE-Southdal / e 't, ,, Center te
i'.> or — 4..., Age e is-Southdala • V'
CY% *
'4614
:
p 1111L • Jivr ▪ -
—am=
/cy
Gallorla
slaaa a •
W 70th St
•- - 7 froNr117 7
,t •
rr,asr •
25010 20%.
'at
Aria W 71st St
7:714-A
W 70th St
Spack
TM TAF f IC STUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.1
Trip Distribution
North
No Scale
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 17 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North
No Scale
k
A
v
e
S
o
u
th
›-
CVS-Apartment
Right in/Right-out
West 69th St
Spack
THr ik,41 FiC Sr CCI COMPANY
Figure 4.2 - Weekday AM
Peak Hour Volume Due to Development
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 18 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North
No Scale
West 69th St
Right in/Right-out
Speck Hit TkA1 [IC SIUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.3 - Weekday PM
Peak Hour Volume Due to Development
19 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study
North
No Scale
CVS-Apartment
Right in/Right-out
West 69th St
Spack.
IltAFFIC SlUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.4 - Saturday Midday
Peak Hour Volume Due to Development
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 20 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
500 1,000
Right in/Right-out
pSack
I NE I KAIF IC SIUDY COMPAI1Y
Figure 4.5
Daily Volume Due to Development
North
No Scale
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 21 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North -
No Scale
Existing Driveway
Temporarit Closed
West 69th St
Spack
THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.6 - 2011 No-Build
Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 22 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North
No Scale
+slow 175
Om 5
Existing Driveway
Temporaril Closed
West 69th St
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 23 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Spack
1HE IRAIEIC SlUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.7 - 2011 No-Build
Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes
North
No Scale
4.0
CD
West 69th St
11n 190
Existing Driveway
Temporaril Closed
Spack
lk n Nf iC SlUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.8 - 2011 No-Builc
Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 24 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
0 0
••n •n •
West 69th St
10,600
Spack
t„, IkA[fIC SIUDY COMPANY
Figure 4.9
2011 No-Build Daily Volumes
North
No Scale
0
4,400
Existing Driveway
4
Temporarily Closed
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 25 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North
No Scale
10 10
4=1.145
West 69th St
CVS-Apartment
Right in/Right-out
SP a Ck
IIIF IkAFIK, S1UUY COMJ'ANY
Figure 4.10 - 2011 Build
Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 26 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
14
20J
250
55
200j
1951m.
150
—C 4,1
0
V)
CVS-Apartment
Right in/Right-out
Spack
IllL SIUUY COMPANY
Figure 4.11 -2011 Build
Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes
North
No Scale
West 69th St
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 27 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
North
No Scale
CVS-Apartment
Rightin/Right-out
West 69th St
Spack
1HF flAIl IC S1UDY COMPANY
Figure 4.12 -2011 Build
Saturday Midday Peak Hour Volumes
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 28 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
West 69th St
10,800
U
4,400
CVS-Apartment
Yo
r
k
A
v
e
S
o
u
th
0 0
Spack,
I lit IRA( ICI LWI COtA'ANI
Figure 4.13
2011 Build Daily Volumes
North
No Scale
Right in/Right-out
0
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 29 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis
a. 2011 Level of Service Analysis
The LOS results for the 2011 scenario study hours are shown in
Table 5.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane
configurations as shown in Figure 3.1 for the existing intersections
plus the proposed development access configuration described in
the previous sections. No improvements are programmed at any of
the existing study intersections.
The forecast turning movement volumes for each No-Build and
Build scenario peak hour were used in the LOS calculations. The
LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software with the
City of Edina provided model (including the existing signal timing
plans). The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for
individual movements, are included in the Appendix.
Table 5.1 — 2011 Level of Service (LOS)1
Int.
1
Intersection
Weekday
No-
Build
n-a
A.M. Weekday
No-
Build Build
A (a) n-a
P.M. Sat. Midday
No-
Build Build
A (a) n-a
Build
A (a) York Ave/CVS-
Aiartment Rt-in-Rt-out
2 York Ave/69th St B (d) B (d) C (f) C (f) C (f) C (f)
3 69th St/Key Cadillac
Dvwy-CVS Rt-out A (a) A (a) A (a) A (a) A (a) A (a)
69th St/Key Cadillac- 4 A (a) A aliment Dvw A (a) A (b) A (b) A (b) A (b)
'The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. The second letter
(in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement.
The results in Table 5.1 show there is no difference between the
No-Build and Build scenarios, meaning the proposed development
will have little impact on the study intersections. The York
Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2)
intersection will operate acceptably at
LOS C or better, however the
eastbound left turn movement will
continue to operate at LOS F during
the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak hours indicating the
existing signal timing plans could be improved. If the signal timing
plans are optimized, the intersection can operate at LOS C or better
with each movement operating at LOS D or better (see the
Appendix for optimized LOS results). The unsignalized
intersections on 69th Street (Intersections 1, 3, & 4) operate
All of the intersections
will operate acceptably
in the 2011 No-Build
and Build scenarios.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 30 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or
better.
Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2011 daily volumes anticipated on
York Avenue and 69th Street in the No-Build and Build scenarios.
Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's
Highway Capacity Manual, a four-lane divided roadway with right
and left turn lanes such as York Avenue and 69th Street will operate
at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28,000 to 35,000
vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily
volume thresholds for LOS D on York Avenue and 69th Street in
both the 2011 No-Build and Build scenarios.
b. Queuing Analysis
The Level of Service results do not fully address the impact of
vehicles weaving across lanes in short distances. Problems with
vehicles weaving across lanes could occur for two movements with
the proposed site plan. The first is vehicles turning eastbound out
of the CVS right-out access on 69th Street (Intersection 3) and then
going into the left turn lane at the 69th Street/Key Cadillac-
Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection to make a u-turn
to ultimately go westbound on 69th Street. The second is vehicles
turning northbound onto York Avenue from the right-in/right-out
driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the
northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue/69th
Street (Intersection 2) intersection.
To determine the length of the queues on the eastbound approach
of the 69th Street/Key Cadillac-Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4)
intersection and the northbound approach at the York Avenue/69th
Street (Intersection 2) intersection, a more detailed traffic analysis
was performed with a SimTrafficTm micro-simulation model. The
intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.1 were used
with the 2011 Build Weekday a.m., Weekday p.m., and Saturday
midday peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10, 4.11
and 4.12. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were
transferred from the City provided SYNCHROTM model to
SimTrafficTm.
The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of
0, a seeding duration of 5 minutes, and a recording duration of 60
minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five
times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a
seeding duration of 5 minutes and a recording duration of 60
minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the
Appendix.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 31 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Table 5.2 shows the stacking results for the eastbound approach to
the 69th Street/Key Cadillac-Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4)
intersection and the northbound approach to the York Avenue/69th
Street (Intersection 2) intersection in the 2011 Build Scenario.
Table 5.2 — 2011 Build Peak Hour Stacking Resultsl
Weekday AM Weekday PM Sat Midday
69
th S
t
/K
e
y
C
a
di
l
l
a
c
-
Ap
tm
t Dy
w
y
(In
te
r
s
e
c
t
io
n 4
)
E
a
s
t
bo
u
n
d Left 50 ft
(90 ft)
40 ft
(90 ft)
40 ft
(90 ft)
Thru 20 ft
(120 ft)
90 ft
(120 ft)
10 ft
(120 ft)
Right Oft
(120 ft)
90 ft
(120 ft)
10 ft
(120 ft)
Yo
r
k
A
v
e
/6
9
th St
(In
te
rs
e
c
t
io
n
2)
N
o
rt
hb
o
u
n
d Left 90 ft
(100 ft)
120 ft2
(100 ft)
120 ft2
(100 ft)
Thru 90 ft
(160 ft)
170 ft2
(160 ft)
180 ft2
(160 ft)
Right 90 ft
(160 ft)
170 ft2
(160 ft)
180 ft2
(160 ft)
. . ' " • ' ' "' " '" " • " • pproxima e queue iengtns are in teet witn tne iirst value oeing trie maximum
queue reported by SimTrafficTm for the longest queue for that movement,
regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the
storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance from the
revious intersection.
There is room to improve the overall delay experienced at the study
intersections through traffic signal retiming, but maximum queues will not be
reduced significantly with optimization due to the short stacking distance between
the signal and existing driveway.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 32 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
The results in Table 5.2 show the maximum queues during the
2011 Build study peak hours will not spill out of the turn lane or
back up past the CVS right-out driveway (Intersection 3) on the
eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac-Apartment
Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection.
According to the Transportation Research Board's Access
Management Manual, "recent research indicates that a right turn
followed by a u-turn is safer than a direct left turn from an access
connectionl." Approximately ten u-turns will be made during each
peak hour and are not anticipated to cause any problems.
The results in Table 5.2 show the maximum queues during the
2011 Build study peak hours will spill out of the turn lane and back
up past the CVS right-in/right-out driveway (Intersection 1) on the
northbound approach to the York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection
2) intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak
hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours
will be turning northbound onto York Avenue from the right-in/right-
out driveway (Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the
northbound to westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue/69th
Street (Intersection 2) intersection. This is a low volume of vehicles
and is not expected to cause crash problems. Furthermore, there
are opportunities to improve the signal timing plan at the York
Avenue/69t1' Street (Intersection 2) intersection to minimize the
stacking on York Avenue while still maintaining an acceptable LOS
D or better at the intersection.
c. Parking Analysis
According to a trip generation study completed by Traffic Data Inc.
in November 2009 for CVS Pharmacies in the Twin Cities area, the
maximum parking rate for the PM peak hour was found to be 2.54
parked stalls per 1,000 square feet of building or 33 stalls for a
13,000 square foot pharmacy. The proposed site is required to
provide 80 parking stalls per City of Edina ordinances. The site
plan currently has 86 surface parking stalls and 4 surface
handicapped stalls, meeting the City's requirements. The amount
of parking provided is expected to be adequate for the site.
In addition to the 90 stalls proposed by CVS, the York Place
apartment complex will retain 17 parking stalls adjacent to its
building as part of the site. The overall parking lot on the southeast
corner of York Avenue and 69th Street will contain 107 stalls.
1 Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Access Management Manual, 2003,
page 204.
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 33 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
d. Pedestrians & Bicycles
Pedestrian volumes were relatively low for this area and should not
be impacted by the nominal increase in traffic volume. Sidewalks
are provided along each side of York Avenue and also along the
south side of 69th Street. No segregated bicycle facilities exist
adjacent to the project site, but it is recommended bicycle racks be
provided at the site to promote bicycle usage along the York
Avenue and 69th Street corridors.
e. Crash Analyses
Crash records were reviewed for the study intersections to see if
there are existing safety problems that may be exacerbated by
traffic from the proposed site. Crash records from 2004 through
2008 (the last five years of publicly available records) were
analyzed with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Too/ (a
database provided and maintained by Mn/DOT). There were no
crashes associated with the three stop sign controlled study
intersections during the five year period.
There were 17 crashes at the York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection
2) intersection during the five year period (the individual crash
reports are included in the Appendix). Of the 17 crashes over the
last five years, only three of them were associated with the
northbound approach to the intersection. One of the crashes had
injuries, two of the crashes were indicated as possible injury
crashes, and the remaining crashes were property damage only.
Eight of the crashes were rear-end crashes, two were left turn
related, five were right angle related, and two were undesignated
by the officers.
Given less than one crash per year is associated with the
northbound approach, it is assumed traffic from the site's right-
in/right-out driveway (Intersection 1) on York Avenue will not cause
a safety problem.
f. Travel Demand Management Plan
The intent of a Travel Demand Management Plan is to reduce the
amount of single occupant vehicles during rush hour. CVS
Pharmacy is not a large enough employer at this location to fully
implement strategies such as structured carpooling and due to its
retail nature it can't implement strategies such as telecommuting.
However, CVS Pharmacy will work to encourage alternate modes
of transportation for both its employees and patrons.
York Avenue is a significant bus route for Metro Transit, connecting
to the Southdale Transit Center. A bus stop is located on the west
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 34 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
side of York Avenue south of 69th Street across from the proposed
site. A bus stop is also located on the east side of York Avenue
north of 69th Street approximately 400 feet from the proposed site.
These bus stops are served by Metro Transit Routes 6, 538, 539,
and 578. CVS Pharmacy will post bus schedules near its doors for
its employees and patrons use.
69th Street is designated as a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of
Edina's Comprehensive Plan. To encourage the use Edina's
Bicycle Routes near the site, CVS Pharmacy will provide bicycle
racks near its entrances.
To encourage walking, as well as the use of nearby transit,
sidewalks will be built around the site as shown in Figure 2.2. This
will connect the site with sidewalks along York Avenue and 69th
Street, which already have sidewalk systems that extend away from
the site.
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
The York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection currently
operates acceptably at LOS C and will continue to operate acceptably at
LOS C in both the 2011 No-Build and Build scenarios. The stop sign
controlled study intersections on 69th Street (Intersections 3 & 4), as well
as the CVS Pharmacy driveway on York Avenue (Intersection 1) will
operate acceptably at LOS A with each movement operating at LOS B or
better in the 2011 No-Build and Build scenarios.
The maximum queues during the 2011 Build study peak hours will not spill
out of the turn lane or back up past the CVS right-out driveway
(Intersection 3) on the eastbound approach to the 69th Street/Key Cadillac-
Apartment Driveway (Intersection 4) intersection. Approximately ten u-
turns will be made during each peak hour and are not anticipated to cause
any problems.
The 2011 Build study peak hour queues at York Avenue/69th Street
(Intersection 2) will spill out of the turn lane and back up past the CVS
right-in/right-out driveway (Intersection 1) on the northbound approach to
the intersection during the Weekday p.m. and Saturday midday peak
hours. Approximately ten vehicles during each of these peak hours will be
turning right onto York Avenue from the right-in/right-out driveway
(Intersection 1) and then crossing lanes to get into the northbound to
westbound left turn lane at the York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2)
intersection. This is a low volume of vehicles and is not expected to cause
crash problems. Furthermore, there are opportunities to improve the
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 35 York Avenue/691h Street - Edina, MN
signal timing plan at the York Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2)
intersection to minimize stacking while still maintaining an acceptable LOS
D or better at the intersection.
In order to accommodate all modes of transportation after the proposed
CVS Pharmacy is built, the following improvements are recommended:
• Install bicycle racks near the doors of the building.
• Post transit schedules in their entrances.
• Install the sidewalks as shown on the site plan.
• Work with Hennepin County to retime the traffic signal at the York
Avenue/69th Street (Intersection 2) intersection after the CVS
Pharmacy is fully operational.
7. Appendix
A. Traffic counts
B. Trip generation memo
C. Capacity analysis backup
D. Queuing analysis backup
E. Crash Reports
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 36 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
I= MI
CLJ Ill
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
York Ave & W 69th St - AM
Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
File Name : 1441011-York Ave & W 69th St-AM
Site Code : 01441011
Start Date : 3/18/2010
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
York Ave
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
York Ave
Northbound Eastbound
W 69th St
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
07:00 AM 9 39 3 0 51 8 9 6 0 23 3 40 9 1 53 5 5 8 0 18 145
07:15 AM 13 51 5 0 69 14 20 9 2 45 5 55 6 0 66 13 6 15 1 35 215
07:30 AM 15 88 5 1 109 9 14 3 1 27 1 66 8 0 75 15 13 12 2 42 253
07:45 AM 12 87 2 0 101 9 30 5 0 44 2 73 17 0 92 18 17 9 0 44 281
Total 49 265 15 1 330 40 73 23 3 139 11 234 40 1 286 51 41 44 3 139 894
08:00 AM 8 108 3 0 119 8 15 6 0 29 2 62 8 0 72 13 11 11 1 36 256
08:15 AM 20 98 3 1 122 3 17 7 0 27 4 62 13 0 79 16 11 10 4 41 269
08:30 AM 15 96 0 2 113 6 9 9 0 24 2 85 10 0 97 19 8 13 3 43 277
08:45 AM 19 104 4 0 127 9 13 9 0 31 2 81 23 0 106 21 13 10 3 47 311
Total 62 406 10 3 481 26 54 31 0 111 10 290 54 0 354 69 43 44 11 167 1113
Grand Total 111 671 25 4 811 66 127 54 3 250 21 524 94 1 640 120 84 88 14 306 2007
Apprch % 13.7 82.7 3.1 0.5 26.4 50.8 21.6 1.2 3.3 81.9 14.7 0.2 39.2 27.5 28.8 4.6
Total % 5.5 33.4 1.2 0.2 40.4 3.3 6.3 2.7 0.1 12.5 1 26.1 4.7 0 31.9 6 4.2 4.4 0.7 15.2
York Ave
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
York Ave
Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
- • - -- -- - ' -- - " ' " - ' " " " eak Hour AnalYsiS rom 01:00 AM to . AM - F'eaK 1 o
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
8
.
..
98
3
3
0
1
119
122
8
3
15
17
6
7
0
0
29
27
2
.
62
62
8
13
0
0
72
79
13
16
11
11
11
10
1
4
36
41
256
269
08:30 AM 15 96 0 2 113 6 9 9 0 24 2 85 10 0 97 19 8 13 3 43 277
08:45 AM 19 104 4 o 127 9 13 9 0 31 2 81 23 o 106 21 13 10 3 47 311
Total Volume 62 406 10 3 481 26 54 31 0 111 10 290 54 0 354 69 43 44 11 167 1113
% App. Total 12.9 84.4 2.1 0.6 23.4 48.6 27.9 0 2.8 81.9 15.3 0 41.3 25.7 26.3 6.6
PHF .775 .940 .625 .375 .947 .722 .794 .861 .000 .895 .625 .853 .587 .000 .835 .821 .827 .846 .688 .888 .895
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study Al
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
(,!,'=•n
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
York Ave & West 69th St - PM
Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
Site Code :01441011
Start Date : 3/18/2010
Page No :1
File Name : 1441011-York ave & W 69th St-PM
Grour,s Printed- Unshifted
York Avenue
Southbound
West 69th St
Westbound
York Avenue
Northbound
West 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM 21 209 6 0 236 15 13 11 5 44 7 176 22 0 205 32 35 48 0 115 600
04:15 PM 22 153 11 0 186 9 14 6 1 30 6 202 21 1 230 40 27 34 3 104 550
04:30 PM 30 140 8 1 179 6 26 5 3 40 10 162 31 1 204 34 47 57 3 141 564
04:45 PM 45 185 12 1 243 16 20 14 2 52 11 188 32 4 235 29 49 52 1 131 661
Total 118 687 37 2 844 46 73 36 11 166 34 728 106 6 874 135 158 191 7 491 2375
05:00 PM 43 163 7 3 216 12 20 10 5 47 10 200 24 1 235 41 49 55 4 149 647
05:15 PM 39 183 13 2 237 12 19 6 6 43 6 222 32 0 260 40 47 44 1 132 672
05:30 PM 36 177 13 4 230 12 24 9 8 53 9 206 26 2 243 35 30 52 1 118 644
05:45 PM 24 199 12 0 235 5 19 7 1 32 5 164 20 1 190 35 38 53 2 128 585
Total 142 722 45 9 918 41 82 32 20 175 30 792 102 4 928 151 164 204 8 527 2548
Grand Total 260 1409 82 11 1762 87 155 68 31 341 64 1520 208 10 1802 286 322 395 15 1018 4923
Apprch °A) 14.8 80 4.7 0.6 25.5 45.5 19.9 9.1 3.6 84.4 11.5 0.6 28.1 31.6 38.8 1.5
Total % 5.3 28.6 1.7 0.2 35.8 1.8 3.1 1.4 0.6 6.9 1.3 30.9 4.2 0.2 36.6 5.8 6.5 8 0.3 20.7
York Avenue
Southbound
West 69th St
Westbound
York Avenue
Northbound
West 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM ... 1E6 12 1 ,.. ,. 20 14 2 52 11 188 32 4 235 29 49 52 1 131 661
05:00 PM 43 163 7 3 216 12 20 10 5 47 10 200 24 1 235 41 49 55 4 149 647
05:15 PM 39 183 13 2 237 12 19 6 6 43 6 222 32 0 260 40 47 44 1 132 672
05:30 PM 36 177 13 4 230 12 24 9 8 53 9 206 26 2 243 35 30 52 1 118 644
Total Volume 163 708 45 10 926 52 83 39 21 195 36 816 114 7 973 145 175 203 7 530 2624
% App. Total 17.6 76.5 4.9 1.1 26.7 42.6 20 10.8 3.7 83.9 11.7 0.7 27.4 33 38.3 1.3
PHF .906 .957 .865 .625 .953 .813 .865 .696 .656 .920 .818 .919 .891 .438 .936 .884 .893 .923 .438 .889 .976
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A2
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
MIN I
--‘1
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
York Ave & W 69th St - Sat
Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
File Name : 1441011-York Ave & W 69th St-Sat
Site Code : 01441011
Start Date : 3/20/2010
Page No :1
Grou s Printed- Unshifted
York Ave
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
York Ave
Northbound Eastbound
W 69th St
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thro Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total lot. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
11:00 AM 45 155 6 0 206 16 13 8 0 37 10 194 28 3 235 39 14 57 0 110 588
11:15 AM 39 205 7 0 251 19 19 5 4 47 5 198 25 4 232 46 8 45 0 99 629
11:30 AM 28 185 8 1 222 11 26 10 3 50 6 234 32 0 272 40 16 54 0 110 654
11:45 AM 74 207 9 0 290 17 13 11 3 44 6 219 45 0 270 49 15 56 1 121 725
Total 186 752 30 1 969 63 71 34 10 178 27 845 130 7 1009 174 53 212 1 440 2596
12:00 PM 39 200 7 0 246 14 24 10 5 53 8 235 38 1 282 31 12 54 0 97 678
12:15 PM 49 214 9 0 272 17 21 9 2 49 6 254 29 0 289 46 13 59 o 118 728
12:30 PM 56 190 6 0 252 15 21 10 0 46 9 226 45 0 280 39 15 61 0 115 693
12:45 PM 62 252 5 0 319 17 21 10 4 52 10 236 40 0 286 40 15 52 1 108 765
Total 206 856 27 0 1089 63 87 39 11 200 33 951 152 1 1137 156 55 226 1 438 2864
Grand Total 392 1608 57 1 2058 126 158 73 21 378 60 1796 282 8 2146 330 108 438 1 878 5460
Apprch % 19 78.1 2.8 0 33.3 41.8 19.3 5.6 2.8 83.7 13.1 0.4 37.6 12.3 49.9 0.2
Total % 7.2 29.5 1 0 37.7 2.3 2.9 1.3 0.4 6.9 1.1 32.9 5.2 0.1 39.3 6 2 8 0 16.1
York Ave
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
York Ave
Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Then Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Tbru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12.45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:00 PM
12:00 PM 39 200 7 0 246 14 . III 5 ,1 8 235 38 1 282 31 12 54 0 97 678
12:15 PM 49 214 9 0 272 17 21 9 2 49 6 254 29 0 289 46 13 59 0 118 728
12:30 PM 56 190 6 0 252 15 21 10 0 46 9 226 45 0 280 39 15 61 0 115 693
12:45 PM 62 252 5 0 319 17 21 10 4 52 10 236 40 0 286 40 15 52 1 108 765
Total Volume 206 856 27 0 1089 63 87 39 11 200 33 951 152 1 1137 156 55 226 1 438 2864
% App. Total 18.9 78.6 2.5 0 31.5 43.5 19.5 5.5 2.9 83.6 13.4 0.1 35.6 12.6 51.6 0.2
PHF .831 .849 .750 .000 .853 .926 .906 .975 .550 .943 .825 .936 .844 .250 .984 .848 .917 .926 .250 .928 .936
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A3
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
/*J mmi I
1°0 In
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
(no thru volumes)
W 69th St & Key Cad. Rt in/Rt out - AM
Edina, MN
File Name : 1441012-W 69th St & Key Cad Rt-in Rt-out-AM
Site Code : 01441012
Start Date : 3/18/2010
Page No :1
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Groups Printed- Class 1
Key Cadillac Right-in/Right-out
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total In Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
07:00 AM 0 0 o o o 1 o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o 1
*** BREAK ***
07:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 o o o 1 o o o o o o o o 2
07:45 AM 2 o o 0 2 o o o o 0 o o o o 0 o o 0 0 0 2
Total 3 0 0 0 3 2 o 0 o 2 o o o o 0 o o o o 5
08:00 AM o 0 o o o 1 0 0 o 1 o o o o o o o o o o 1
08:15 AM 0 0 0 o o 3 o o o 3 o o o o o o o o o o 3
08:30 AM 1 0 0 1 2 3 o o o 3 o o o o o o o o o o 5
08:45 AM 0 0 o o o 4 o o o 4 o o o o o o o o o o 4
Total 1 o 0 1 2 11 0 0 o 11 o o o o o o o o o o 13
Grand Total 4 0 0 1 5 13 0 0 0 13 o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o o 18
Apprch %
Total %
80
22.2
0
0
0
0
20
5.6 27.8
100
72.2
0
o
0
o
o
o 72.2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o
Key Cadillac Right-in/Right-out
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Other I App. Total Rght I Thru I Left I Other I App. Total Rght i Thru I Left I Other I App. Total Rght I Thru I Left I Other I App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Beams at 08:00 AM
Int. Total I
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
08:30 AM 0 0 2 3 0 o 0 3 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o ,
08:45 AM 0 0 o 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total Volume 1 0 0 1 2 11 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 o 0 o o o o o 13
% App. Total 50 o 0 50 100 o o 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 o
PHF .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .688 .000 .000 .000 .688 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .650
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A4
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
=MI
ati 1111
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
(no thru volumes)
W 69th St & Key Cad. Rt-in/Rt-out - PM
Edina, MN
1441012-W 69th St & Key Cad Rt-in Rt-out-PM
01441012
3/18/2010
1
Grou s Printed- Class 1
Key Cadillac Right-in/Right-out
Southbound
West 69th Street
Westbound Northbound
West 69th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM
04:15 PM
*** BREAK ***
04:45 PM
2 0 o 0 2
1 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 1
1 o o o 1
1 0 0 0 1
2 0 0 0 2
o o o o o
o o o o o
0 0 0 0 0
o o o o o
o o o o o
0 0 0 0 0
3
2
3
Total 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 o o o o o o o o 0 8
*** BREAK "**
05:15 PM 1 1 1 1 2
05:30 PM 2 2 2 2 4
05:45 PM 1 1 0 1
Total 4 4 3 0 3 0 0 7
Grand Total 8 0 0 0 8 7 0 0 0 7 o o o 0 o 15
Apprch % 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 o o o o
Total % 53.3 0 0 0 53.3 46.7 0 0 0 46.7 0 0 o o 0
Key Cadillac Right-in/Right-out
Southbound
West 69th Street
Westbound Northbound
West 69th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Other [ Aoo. Total Rght 1 Thru I Left I Other App. Total Rght I lbw I Left I Other I Aca Total Rght I Thru I Left I Other I Aoo. Total
Peak Hour Arelyss Fran 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM- Peak 1 of 1
Int Total 1
04:45 PM 0 1 2 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 9
21:00 1 M 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
06:16 P M
1
0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
1
0 0 2 0 0 0
0
0 2 0 2
06:20 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 2 4
Total Volume 4 o o o 4 5 o o o 5 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 9
% App. Total 100 o o o loo o o o o o o o o 0 o o
PHF .500 .000 .000 .000 .500 .625 .000 .000 .000 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .563
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A5 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
File Name : 1441012-W 69th St & Key Cad Rt-in Rt-out-Sat
Site Code : 01441012
Start Date : 3/20/2010
Page No :1
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
IOto
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
(no thru volumes)
W 69th St & Key Cad. Rt in/Rt out - Sat
Edina, MN
GrouDs Printed- Class 1
Key Cadillac Right-in/Right-out
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total Rght Thru Left Other App. Total int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
11:00 AM 5 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
11:15 AM 4 0 0 0 4 2 o o 0 2 o o o o o o o o o 0 6
11:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 o o o o o o o o o 0 2
11:45 AM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 o o o o o o o o o 0 4
Total 12 0 0 0 12 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
12:00 PM 4 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
12:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
12:30 PM 4 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 7
12:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 o 2 o o o o o o o o o 0 3
Total 10 0 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 12 o o o o o o o o o 0 22
Grand Total 22 0 0 0 22 19 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Apprch °A) 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o
Total % 53.7 0 0 0 53.7 46.3 0 0 0 46.3 o o o o o o o o o o
Key Cadillac Right-in/Right-out
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Other I App. Total Rght I Thru I Left I other I App. Total Rght i Thru I Left I Other I App. Total Rght I Thru I Left I Other I App. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:00 AM
Int. Total I
11:00 AM
11:15 AM 4
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
4 2
0
0
o
0
o
0
,
2
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
7
6
11:30 AM 1 0 0 o 1 1 o o o 1 o o o o o o o o o o 2
11:45 AM 2 0 0 o 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 4
Total Volume 12 o o 0 12 7 o o o 7 o o o o o o o o o 0 19
% App. Total 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .600 .000 .000 .000 .600 .875 .000 .000 .000 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .679
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A6
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
MI MN
3.!3 I
TRAM( DATA IND.
W 69th St & Apartment/Key Cad Drive - AM
Edina, MN
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
File Name : 1441012-W 69th St & Apt Drive-AM
Site Code : 01441012
Start Date : 3/18/2010
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
Key Cadillac Driveway
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
Apartment Driveway
Northbound Eastbound
W 69th St
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Pees App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 _ 1.0 1.0 _ 1.0 _ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 0 0 31 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 2 0 11 43
07:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 3 36 0 0 39 0 0 2 0 2 0 11 4 0 15 57
07:30 AM 1 0 1 0 2 4 25 o 0 29 0 0 1 0 1 0 15 3 0 18 50
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 0 0 42 1 0 2 0 3 0 17 3 0 20 65
Total 1 0 2 0 3 11 130 0 0 141 1 0 5 1 7 0 52 12 0 64 215
08:00 AM 1 0 2 0 3 1 30 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 14 48
08:15 AM 1 0 2 0 3 3 24 0 0 27 1 0 0 0 1 1 12 4 0 17 48
08:30 AM 0 0 1 1 2 2 28 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 11 43
08:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 4 28 1 0 33 0 0 1 0 1 0 13 6 0 19 55
Total 2 0 7 1 10 10 110 1 0 121 1 0 1 0 2 1 45 15 0 61 194
Grand Total 3 0 9 1 13 21 240 1 0 262 2 0 6 1 9 1 97 27 0 125 409
Apprch % 23.1 0 69.2 7.7 8 91.6 0.4 0 22.2 0 66.7 11.1 0.8 77.6 21.6 0
Total % 0.7 0 2.2 0.2 3.2 5.1 58.7 0.2 0 64.1 0.5 0 1.5 0.2 2.2 0.2 23.7 6.6 0 30.6
Key Cadillac Driveway
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
Apartment Driveway
Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thu Left Peds App. Total Right Thu Left Peds App. Total Right Thu Left Peds App. Total Int Total
Peak I-OX ysis ran . -
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Bedre at 07:15AM
07:15 AM
07 30 A M
0
_
0
0
1
2
o
0
1
2
3
9
36
20
o
0
o
0
39
29
0
0
0
2
12
0
0
2
1
0
0
11
16 0
0
0
16
18
67
60
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 o 2 40 0 0 42 1 0 2 0 3 0 17 3 0 20 65
08:00 AM 1 0 2 o 3 1 30 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 o o 13 1 0 14 48
Total Volume 2 0 4 0 6 10 131 0 0 141 1 0 5 0 6 0 56 11 0 67 220
% App. Total 33.3 0 66.7 o 7.1 92.9 0 0 16.7 0 83.3 o o 83.6 16.4 0
PHF .500 .000 .500 .000 .500 .625 .819 .000 .000 .839 .250 .000 .625 .000 .500 .000 .824 .688 .000 .838 .846
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A7 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc.
TRAFFIC DATA INC.
W 69th St & Apartment/Key Cad Drive - PM
Edina, MN
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1441012-W 69th St & Apt Drive-PM
Site Code : 01441012
Start Date : 3/18/2010
Page No :1
Grou s Printed- Unshifted
Key Cadillac Drive
Southbound
West 69th Street
Westbound Northbound
West 69th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left P • e....d s App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM 4 0 0 0 4 1 31 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1 0 47 83
04:15 PM 2 0 3 0 5 3 31 0 0 34 0 0 1 1 2 1 37 3 0 41 82
04:30 PM 1 0 4 0 5 1 32 0 0 33 0 0 1 0 1 0 63 0 0 63 102
04:45 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 49 0 0 50 0 0 1 2 3 1 59 3 0 63 118
Total 7 0 7 2 16 6 143 0 0 149 0 0 3 3 6 2 205 7 0 214 385
05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 40 0 0 40 0 0 0 1 1 1 65 1 0 67 109
05:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 41 1 0 42 1 0 0 0 1 0 60 0 0 60 104
05:30 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 41 0 0 41 1 0 0 1 2 3 50 2 0 55 100
05:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 29 0 0 29 0 0 1 0 1 0 52 0 0 52 83
Total 1 0 2 2 5 0 151 1 0 152 2 0 1 2 5 4 227 3 0 234 396
Grand Total 8 0 9 4 21 6 294 1 0 301 2 0 4 5 11 6 432 10 0 448 781
Apprch % 38.1 0 42.9 19 2 97.7 0.3 0 18.2 0 36.4 45.5 1.3 96.4 2.2 0
Total % 1 0 1.2 0.5 2.7 0.8 37.6 0.1 0 38.5 0.3 0 0.5 0.6 1.4 0.8 55.3 1.3 0 57.4
Key Cadillac Drive
Southbound
West 69th Street
Westbound Northbound
West 69th Street
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right ihru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int Total
ysis rom : :
04:30 PM , -- . . . . , 00
0 0 00 0 0
1 0 1 0 63 0 0 63 102
04:45 PM 0 0 0 2 2 1 49 0 0 50 0 0 1 2 3 1 59 3 0 63 118
05:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 40 0 0 40 0 0 0 1 1 1 65 1 0 67 109
05:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 41 1 0 42 1 0 0 0 1 0 60 0 0 60 104
Total Volume 2 0 5 2 9 2 162 1 0 165 1 0 2 3 6 2 247 4 0 253 433
% App. Total 22.2 0 55.6 22.2 1.2 98.2 0.6 0 16.7 0 33.3 50 0.8 97.6 1.6 0
PHF .500 .000 .313 .250 .450 .500 .827 .250 .000 .825 .250 .000 .500 .375 .500 .500 .950 .333 .000 .944 .917
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A8
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
W 69th St & Apartment/Key Cad Drive -Sat
Edina, MN
mu.
oti UI
TRAM( DATA IV.
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park, MN 55416
File Name : 1441012-W 69th St & Apt Drive -Sat
Site Code : 01441012
Start Date : 3/20/2010
Page No : 1
Grou s Printed- Unshifted
Key Cadillac Driveway
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
Apartment Driveway
Northbound Eastbound
W 69th St
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Pods App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 1 0 1 2 4 1 26 1 0 28 63
11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 1 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 62
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 2 0 48 0 0 1 0 1 0 28 2 0 30 79
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 1 0 38 0 0 1 0 1 0 25 5 0 30 69
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 4 0 159 1 0 3 2 6 1 99 8 0 108 273
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 1 0 46 1 0 2 0 3 3 22 3 0 28 77
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 1 0 22 2 0 24 72
12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 1 0 37 1 0 1 0 2 2 25 4 0 31 70
12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 48 0 0 2 0 2 1 24 3 0 28 78
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 2 0 178 2 0 6 0 8 6 93 12 0 111 297
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 331 6 0 337 3 0 9 2 14 7 192 20 0 219 570
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 0 98.2 1.8 0 21.4 0 64.3 14.3 3.2 87.7 9.1 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 58.1 1.1 0 59.1 0.5 0 1.6 0.4 2.5 1.2 33.7 3.5 0 38.4
Key Cadillac Driveway
Southbound
W 69th St
Westbound
Apartment Driveway
Northbound
W 69th St
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11'30 AM
11:30 AM 0
_
0 0 0 0 0 46 : 0 . 0 0 1 0 1 0 . 2 0 .. 79
11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 1 0 38 0 0 1 0 1 0 25 5 0 30 69
12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 1 0 46 1 0 2 0 3 3 22 3 0 28 77
12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 1 0 22 2 0 24 72
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 4 0 179 1 0 5 0 6 3 97 12 0 112 297
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 97.8 2.2 0 16.7 0 83.3 0 2.7 86.6 10.7 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .931 .500 .000 .932 .250 .000 .625 .000 .500 .250 .866 .600 .000 .933 .940
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study A9
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc. Page 1
www.trafficdatainc.com
952.926.0916
Site Code: 000000144943
York Avenue south of 69th Street
Edina, MN
Start
20-Jul-09
Tue Wed
Thu Fn Sat Sun Week Average
Time SB NB
SB NB
SB NB
SB NB
SB NB
SB NB
SB NB SB NB
12:00 AM
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 PM
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
*
*
742
823
956
853
817
858
905
896
730
600
454
309
154
83
*
* *
*
* *
*
*
*
*
646
921
955
836
785
848
875
956
784
635
506
354
173
68
34
27
12
7
28
81
160
398
584
674
726
854
974
942
843
881
888
876
680
598
490
321
170
81
41
18
9
10
24
52
164
305
395
539
690
913
912
885
813
800
895
1017
745
636
493
373
173
88
53
21
9
8
24
73
183
409
496
668
706
833
1020
958
940
846
859
919
797
594
514
359
166
82
46
30
14
12
14
58
172
304
417
529
634
952
1049
916
804
824
865
982
788
654
530
345
163
76
46
16
15
10
22
77
174
424
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
* *
*
39
16
7
12
15
55
155
293
*
* *
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
* *
*
"
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
* *
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
" *
*
*
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
* *
*
44
21
12
8
25
77
172
410
540
671
725
837
983
918
867
862
884
897
736
597
486
330
163
82
42
21
10
11
18
55
164
301
406
534
657
929
972
879
801
824
878
985
772
642
510
357
170
77
Lane 9180 9342 11329 10990 11537 11178 784 592 0 0 0 0 0 0 11347 11015
Day 18522 22319 22715 1376 0 0 0 22362
AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 11:00
Vol. 823 921 854 913 833 952 424 293 837 929
PM Peak 12:00 17:00 12:00 17:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 17:00
Vol. 956 956 974 1017 1020 1049 983 985
Comb. 18522 22319 22715 Total 1376 0 0 0 22362
ADT ADT 22,517 AADT 22,517
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study Al 0 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix A - Traffic Counts
Traffic Data Inc. Page 1
www.trafficdatainc.com
952.926.0916
Site Code: 000000144941
York Ave north of 69th St
Edina, MN
Start 20-Jul-09 Tue Wed Thu Fri
Sat Sun Week Average
Time NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB
12:00 AM
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00 PM
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
718
1041
1117
1048
990
1001
1029
1098
909
815
636
471
229
103
*
*
*
.
* *
*
*
*
*
735
840
938
807
819
851
871
888
753
622
446
287
151
75
63
24
12
12
26
63
188
334
434
600
766
33
20
12
10
26
73
153
381
551
651
739
56
35
15
14
21
63
198
349
431
591
752
48
23
11
13
22
70
173
417
480
655
740
56
31
6
19
25
69
174
48
16
18
11
23
74
181
"
* *
*
*
*
*
" *
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
* *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
* *
*
*
*
* *
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
* *
" *
* *
* *
*
*
* *
*
*
* *
"
* *
*
* *
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
* *
*
*
"
* *
*
*
"
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
* *
* *
*
*
" *
*
"
*
* *
* *
58
30
11
15
24
65
187
338
432
596
745
1057
1161
1067
995
990
1030
1130
911
806
641
509
235
112
43
20
14
11
24
72
169
403
516
653
738
858
952
870
851
845
874
905
770
616
464
312
160
77
332 410 *
* *
"
* *
*
*
*
*
* *
*
"
*
*
* *
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
* *
* *
*
*
1064
1114
1085
1004
972
1039
1167
872
798
636
558
225
122
862
941
878
830
851
889
886
755
601
468
294
164
83
1065
1251
873
976
1067
992
997
1021
1124
951
805
650
499
251
110
926
904
833
862
941
801
624
478
356
164
72
Lane 11205 9083 13178 11151 13308 11462 712 781 0 0 0 0 0 0 13145 11217
Day 20288 24329 24770 1493 0 0 0 24362
AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 11:00
Vol. 1041 840 1064 862 1065 873 332 410 1057 858
PM Peak 12:00 12:00 17:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00
Vol. 1117 938 1167 941 1251 976 1161 952
Comb. 24770 20288 24329 Total 1493 0 0 0 24362
ADT ADT 24,550 AADT 24,550
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study All York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix B - Trip Generation Memo
Kevin McGhee, Velmeir Companies 3 CVS Pharmacy Trip Generation in MN
The results in Table 1 show CVS Pharmacies in the Twin Cities generate traffic
at a rate consistent with pharmacies nationwide. The slight exception is during
the p.m. peak hour where the Twin Cities rate of 8.94 trips per 1000s of square
feet is lower than the national average of 10.35 trips per 1000s of square feet.
Drive Through Lane Queuing
The manual p.m. peak hour count data in Appendix B shows the maximum
queue observed in the drive through lanes during each fifteen minute period.
The values shown are the maximum number of vehicles observed in both drive
through lanes at one time. The maximum queue observed was three vehicles.
Parking Rates
The manual p.m. peak hour count data in Appendix B also shows the number of
parked vehicles in the lot during each fifteen minute period. The total number of
parked vehicles in the lot was counted at 4 p.m. Then the entering volumes were
added to that total and the exiting volumes were subtracted to give the sum of
the vehicles parked in the lot during each fifteen minute period. The maximum
number of vehicles parked in a CVS Pharmacy lot during the p.m. peak period
observed was 33 vehicles (representing a rate of 2.54 parked stalls per 1,000s of
square feet).
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study B3 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix C - Capacity Analysis Backup
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave 4: 69th Street & CVS Drive-Thru Exit
SBT SBR
r
0 10
Stop
0%
0.95 0.95
0 11
405 121
405 121
6.5 6.9
4.0 3.3
100 99
533 907
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL
Lane Configurations tt +1+ r
Volume (veh/h) 0 160 0 0 220 10 0 0 10 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 168 0 0 232 11 o o 11 0
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft) 200
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 242 168 295 411 84 332
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 242 168 295 411 84 332
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 99 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1321 1407 628 530 958 591
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 84 84 154 88 11 11
Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 11 11 11
cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 958 907
Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 1 1
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 9.0
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 8.8 9.0
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Spack Consulting Synchro 7 - Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study C39 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build AM Peak Hour
39: 69th Street & Southdale SE Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Delay / Veh (s) 6.7 0.4 0.4 5.0 1.6 1.5 5.9 5.0 2.5 3.6 2.3
Total Stops 5 0 1 15 1 0 39 1 39 1 102
Travel Dist (mi) 4.3 17.5 7.9 5.4 15.4 0.8 1.5 0.0 1.4 0.0 54.3
Travel Time (hr) 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.4
Avg Speed (mph) 25 29 26 19 24 21 9 9 11 11 23
Vehicles Entered 29 117 53 55 157 8 39 1 39 1 499
Vehicles Exited 29 118 54 55 157 8 39 1 39 1 501
Hourly Exit Rate 29 118 54 55 157 8 39 1 39 1 501
Input Volume 31 115 56 53 159 8 38 1 36 1 498
% of Volume 94 103 96 104 99 100 103 100 108 100 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40: 69th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 0.6 2.6 1.1 0.4 2.9 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.9 0.0
Delay / Veh (s) 44.6 129.5 54.2 44.4 150.3 71.7 37.8 3.1 2.3 45.6 7.5 3.0
Total Stops 43 68 73 35 67 43 45 46 2 18 130 2
Travel Dist (mi) 4.1 6.5 7.0 1.0 2.2 1.4 1.5 9.9 0.3 2.2 52.8 6.6
Travel Time (hr) 0.7 2.8 1.4 0.4 3.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.3 2.5 0.3
Avg Speed (mph) 6 2 5 2 1 1 3 17 13 7 21 25
Vehicles Entered 45 70 75 30 71 46 48 317 9 19 452 59
Vehicles Exited 45 71 75 30 69 46 48 317 9 19 452 59
Hourly Exit Rate 45 71 75 30 69 46 48 317 9 19 452 59
Input Volume 40 70 70 35 70 45 50 310 10 20 441 60
% of Volume 112 101 107 86 99 102 96 102 90 95 102 98
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40: 69th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 10.5
Delay / Veh (s) 30.4
Total Stops 572
Travel Dist (mi) 95.5
Travel Time (hr) 13.6
Avg Speed (mph) 7
Vehicles Entered 1241
Vehicles Exited 1240
Hourly Exit Rate 1240
Input Volume 1221
% of Volume 102
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 04 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build AM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
51: Galleria East & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4
Delay / Veh (s) 4.1 6.7 1.6 0.7 0.3 1.3
Total Stops 30 15 3 1 1 50
Travel Dist (mi) 1.3 1.5 27.7 18.4 2.1 51.1
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.7 0.1 2.2
Avg Speed (mph) 10 13 24 28 17 24
Vehicles Entered 30 27 507 608 73 1245
Vehicles Exited 30 27 507 606 72 1242
Hourly Exit Rate 30 27 507 606 72 1242
Input Volume 30 30 500 600 70 1230
% of Volume 100 90 101 101 103 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0
55: 70th Street & Galleria SE Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7
Delay / Veh (s) 3.3 4.7 3.4 4.1 1.8 4.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 2.7
Total Stops 9 17 5 5 2 4 4 6 6 11 69
Travel Dist (mi) 10.8 16.6 3.0 5.3 13.1 3.5 0.9 1.8 3.2 7.6 65.8
Travel Time (hr) 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 3.6
Avg Speed (mph) 21 21 21 19 20 19 13 14 14 14 19
Vehicles Entered 133 204 37 57 226 39 19 37 59 140 951
Vehicles Exited 133 204 38 58 226 38 19 37 58 140 951
Hourly Exit Rate 133 204 38 58 226 38 19 37 58 140 951
Input Volume 133 202 40 57 223 42 18 37 62 131 945
% of Volume 100 101 95 102 101 90 106 100 94 107 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D6 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build AM Peak Hour
56: 70th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.3 0.2 1.5 1.5 0.1 0.9 2.0 0.1
Delay / Veh (s) 26.9 29.9 17.2 40.8 36.1 21.3 45.6 13.6 9.9 42.1 14.5 3.0
Total Stops 61 86 86 43 110 27 104 182 29 70 238 33
Travel Dist (mi) 7.5 11.9 11.4 4.7 12.8 3.1 6.6 22.6 3.0 3.8 25.0 3.7
Travel Time (hr) 0.9 1.5 1.1 0.7 1.8 0.3 1.7 2.3 0.3 1.1 2.8 0.2
Avg Speed (mph) 8 8 10 6 7 10 4 10 11 4 9 15
Vehicles Entered 73 118 112 47 132 31 115 393 53 77 502 74
Vehicles Exited 73 118 112 48 132 32 116 398 53 78 501 74
Hourly Exit Rate 73 118 112 48 132 32 116 398 53 78 501 74
Input Volume 77 106 119 51 131 27 115 393 55 77 495 76
% of Volume 95 111 94 94 101 119 101 101 96 101 101 97
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
56: 70th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 10.2
Delay! Veh (s) 21.2
Total Stops 1069
Travel Dist (mi) 116.1
Travel Time (hr) 14.7
Avg Speed (mph) 8
Vehicles Entered 1727
Vehicles Exited 1735
Hourly Exit Rate 1735
Input Volume 1722
% of Volume 101
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D7 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build AM Peak Hour
57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Delay / Veh (s) 5.9 3.4 4.2 4.5 6.8 2.5 4.4 5.9 3.4 5.8 7.0 4.3
Total Stops 22 60 13 1 91 4 29 9 1 3 6 53
Travel Dist (mi) 2.5 17.3 1.5 0.1 7.8 0.3 1.8 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.7 6.4
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Avg Speed (mph) 19 21 19 19 19 20 17 17 18 19 19 19
Vehicles Entered 22 212 13 1 91 4 30 9 1 3 6 53
Vehicles Exited 22 213 13 1 91 4 29 9 1 3 6 53
Hourly Exit Rate 22 213 13 1 91 4 29 9 1 3 6 53
Input Volume 19 205 13 1 87 4 32 10 1 3 8 54
% of Volume 116 104 100 100 105 100 91 90 100 100 75 98
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 0.6
Delay / Veh (s) 4.5
Total Stops 292
Travel Dist (mi) 39.5
Travel Time (hr) 2.0
Avg Speed (mph) 19
Vehicles Entered 445
Vehicles Exited 445
Hourly Exit Rate 445
Input Volume 437
% of Volume 102
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D8 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build AM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr) 28.2
Delay / Veh (s) 34.3
Total Stops 2945
Travel Dist (mi) 896.7
Travel Time (hr) 61.8
Avg Speed (mph) 15
Vehicles Entered 2954
Vehicles Exited 2961
Hourly Exit Rate 2961
Input Volume 12359
% of Volume 24
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D9 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build AM Peak Hour
Intersection: 2: 69th Street & CVS Dvwy
Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served L T L T TR LR LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 49 16 6 4 14 40 30
Average Queue (ft) 5 1 0 0 1 18 10
95th Queue (ft) 27 11 4 3 12 42 33
Link Distance (ft) 164 125 125 101 119
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 50
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 3: CVS Dvwy & York Avenue
Movement WB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 30
Average Queue (ft) 10
95th Queue (ft) 33
Link Distance (ft) 106
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 4: 69th Street & CVS Drive-Thru Exit
Movement WB WB NB SB
Directions Served T TR R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 46 87 30 30
Average Queue (ft) 4 12 8 4
95th Queue (ft) 25 59 30 21
Link Distance (ft) 164 164 102 100
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 010 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build AM Peak Hour
Intersection: 33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T L L R T T R L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 35 57 34 51 74 53 145 166 27 120 81 112
Average Queue (ft) 7 15 4 14 22 24 47 65 2 53 23 36
95th Queue (ft) 28 44 20 40 53 46 109 128 15 99 63 90
Link Distance (ft) 380 380 380 154 154 154 552 552 552 600 600
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 39: 69th Street & Southdale SE
Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L LT R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 24 14 37 49 59 18
Average Queue (ft) 4 0 7 21 25 1
95th Queue (ft) 20 7 24 45 51 11
Link Distance (ft) 776 193 193 217
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 140
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D11 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build AM Peak Hour
Intersection: 40: 69th Street & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 126 151 195 105 139 127 87 90 78 55 126 156
Average Queue (ft) 39 66 98 30 69 87 39 14 27 17 43 62
95th Queue (ft) 86 127 178 79 129 140 80 53 62 49 96 124
Link Distance (ft) 476 476 109 109 106 106 552 552
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 5 17 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 3 12 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 100 100 120
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
Intersection: 40: 69th Street & York Avenue
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 71
Average Queue (ft) 3
95th Queue (ft) 34
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (°/0) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Intersection: 41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue
Movement EB EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 59 31 70 26 60
Average Queue (ft) 22 7 38 16 32
95th Queue (ft) 55 28 57 31 55
Link Distance (ft) 125 125 385 590 1941
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D12 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build AM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 51: Galleria East & York Avenue
Movement EB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served R LT T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 62 66 12 6 15
Average Queue (ft) 17 15 1 0 1
95th Queue (ft) 42 48 7 4 8
Link Distance (ft) 230 212 128 128
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 55: 70th Street & Galleria SE
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 66 41 40 77
Average Queue (ft) 21 9 8 14
95th Queue (ft) 59 35 32 50
Link Distance (ft) 427 380 196 232
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 56: 70th Street & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
197 86
95 24
162 60
212
0 0
0 0
250
0 0
0 0
Maximum Queue (ft) 50 142 198 168 174 154 140 168 126 173
Average Queue (ft) 16 30 100 41 93 79 69 83 57 79
95th Queue (ft) 42 80 188 105 160 135 121 140 107 147
Link Distance (ft) 380 521 301 301 212
Upstream Blk Time (°/0)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 160 160
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 2 0 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 1 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D13 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build AM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 50 66 45 53
Average Queue (ft) 32 34 21 28
95th Queue (ft) 47 54 43 47
Link Distance (ft) 521 400 269 590
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 24
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D14 York Avenue/691h Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg
Start Time 4:55 4:55 4:55 4:55 4:55 4:55
End Time 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00 6:00
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intvls 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 5867 5807 5898 5858 5773 5840
Vehs Exited 5888 5759 5874 5813 5800 5826
Starting Vehs 167 127 158 139 172 148
Ending Vehs 146 175 182 184 145 162
Denied Entry Before 12 2 0 3 5 3
Denied Entry After 23 42 17 42 11 26
Travel Distance (mi) 1922 1874 1907 1911 1904 1903
Travel Time (hr) 178.6 169.3 181.7 183.9 170.5 176.8
Total Delay (hr) 106.2 98.8 109.9 112.4 99.0 105.3
Total Stops 8935 8490 8925 8937 8792 8817
Fuel Used (gal) 105.9 102.0 105.7 106.5 102.9 104.6
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 4:55
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 5:00
End Time 6:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg
Vehs Entered 5867 5807 5898 5858 5773 5840
Vehs Exited 5888 5759 5874 5813 5800 5826
Starting Vehs 167 127 158 139 172 148
Ending Vehs 146 175 182 184 145 162
Denied Entry Before 12 2 0 3 5 3
Denied Entry After 23 42 17 42 11 26
Travel Distance (mi) 1922 1874 1907 1911 1904 1903
Travel Time (hr) 178.6 169.3 181.7 183.9 170.5 176.8
Total Delay (hr) 106.2 98.8 109.9 112.4 99.0 105.3
Total Stops 8935 8490 8925 8937 8792 8817
Fuel Used (gal) 105.9 102.0 105.7 106.5 102.9 104.6
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D15 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
2: 69th Street & CVS Dvwy Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Delay / Veh (s) 2.7 1.6 0.3 4.2 1.6 7.1 4.5 7.3 2.9 2.1
Total Stops 4 7 0 3 0 38 14 3 4 73
Travel Dist (mi) 0.8 9.7 2.2 0.4 5.7 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 20.3
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
Avg Speed (mph) 16 22 18 11 18 7 8 7 11 17
Vehicles Entered 20 244 56 12 177 38 14 3 4 568
Vehicles Exited 20 244 56 12 177 38 14 3 4 568
Hourly Exit Rate 20 244 56 12 177 38 14 3 4 568
Input Volume 20 250 55 15 175 40 15 5 5 580
% of Volume 100 98 102 80 101 95 93 60 80 98
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3: CVS Dvwy & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 1.6
Delay / Veh (s) 12.8 3.0 2.0 2.2 2.7
Total Stops 13 113 1 19 146
Travel Dist (mi) 0.3 39.1 0.4 36.7 76.4
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 2.1 0.0 1.8 4.0
Avg Speed (mph) 4 18 14 20 19
Vehicles Entered 12 1190 10 917 2129
Vehicles Exited 13 1193 10 918 2134
Hourly Exit Rate 13 1193 10 918 2134
Input Volume 10 1196 10 910 2126
% of Volume 130 100 100 101 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D16 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build PM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
4: 69th Street & CVS Drive-Thru Exit Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Delay / Veh (s) 1.5 5.8 2.7 2.2 18.1 3.3
Total Stops 0 29 1 8 4 42
Travel Dist (mi) 13.1 8.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 22.7
Travel Time (hr) 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4
Avg Speed (mph) 19 13 14 10 3 16
Vehicles Entered 314 218 11 8 4 555
Vehicles Exited 314 219 11 8 4 556
Hourly Exit Rate 314 219 11 8 4 556
Input Volume 316 221 10 10 5 562
% of Volume 99 99 110 80 80 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0
33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 1.5 0.3 0.2 1.9 0.5 7.8 0.1 3.0 2.2 0.0 17.3
Delay / Veh (s) 45.6 45.7 5.3 43.5 10.5 26.1 5.0 49.0 11.7 1.9 24.1
Total Stops 104 20 7 141 153 623 23 185 243 0 1499
Travel Dist (mi) 8.4 1.7 7.0 4.8 5.3 124.8 4.7 25.0 78.7 0.2 260.6
Travel Time (hr) 2.0 0.4 0.6 2.3 0.9 11.7 0.2 3.8 4.6 0.0 26.6
Avg Speed (mph) 4 4 14 2 6 11 20 7 18 24 10
Vehicles Entered 116 23 104 161 175 1063 38 217 675 2 2574
Vehicles Exited 114 23 105 157 176 1074 38 220 682 2 2591
Hourly Exit Rate 114 23 105 157 176 1074 38 220 682 2 2591
Input Volume 115 24 99 174 184 1059 36 215 648 1 2555
% of Volume 99 96 106 90 96 101 106 102 105 200 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D17 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build PM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
39: 69th Street & Southdale SE Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 1.9
Delay / Veh (s) 11.0 3.2 1.6 8.0 2.2 2.1 10.5 3.0 5.2
Total Stops 95 12 1 37 6 7 159 38 355
Travel Dist (mi) 30.9 59.2 8.0 6.5 30.5 10.6 5.9 1.6 153.2
Travel Time (hr) 1.8 2.4 0.3 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.9 0.1 7.8
Avg Speed (mph) 21 27 25 16 23 20 7 11 21
Vehicles Entered 208 398 54 67 304 106 160 38 1335
Vehicles Exited 211 399 54 67 303 106 160 38 1338
Hourly Exit Rate 211 399 54 67 303 106 160 38 1338
Input Volume 215 397 54 64 292 100 157 37 1316
% of Volume 98 101 100 105 104 106 102 103 102
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40: 69th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 3.9 4.1 1.4 0.6 2.9 1.1 1.9 1.7 0.1 0.9 4.2 0.5
Delay / Veh (s) 67.9 72.3 34.7 44.3 104.4 54.2 51.8 7.6 5.0 47.1 21.0 9.9
Total Stops 262 200 143 54 92 68 128 210 13 80 452 57
Travel Dist (mi) 21.5 20.4 15.0 1.5 3.1 2.4 4.0 25.4 1.4 8.6 85.8 18.8
Travel Time (hr) 4.8 4.8 2.1 0.6 3.0 1.3 2.1 2.5 0.1 1.2 6.9 1.1
Avg Speed (mph) 4 4 7 2 1 2 2 10 10 7 13 17
Vehicles Entered 208 203 147 47 100 75 131 819 47 72 727 170
Vehicles Exited 209 205 148 46 99 76 133 818 47 72 722 169
Hourly Exit Rate 209 205 148 46 99 76 133 818 47 72 722 169
Input Volume 200 204 150 50 101 75 120 821 45 75 710 160
% of Volume 104 100 99 92 98 101 111 100 104 96 102 106
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40: 69th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 23.3
Delay / Veh (s) 30.6
Total Stops 1759
Travel Dist (mi) 207.9
Travel Time (hr) 30.5
Avg Speed (mph) 7
Vehicles Entered 2746
Vehicles Exited 2744
Hourly Exit Rate 2744
Input Volume 2711
% of Volume 101
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D18 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build PM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Delay / Veh (s) 8.2 9.2 3.1 5.9 6.4 3.9 5.7 7.2 3.7 6.3 7.1 3.9
Total Stops 13 216 26 16 114 5 10 55 60 11 49 51
Travel Dist (mi) 0.4 7.6 0.9 1.3 9.5 0.4 1.2 6.8 7.3 4.0 18.1 18.9
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.7
Avg Speed (mph) 9 9 12 17 18 18 18 18 19 25 25 26
Vehicles Entered 12 222 26 16 115 5 10 56 60 11 49 51
Vehicles Exited 13 221 26 16 114 5 10 56 60 11 49 51
Hourly Exit Rate 13 221 26 16 114 5 10 56 60 11 49 51
Input Volume 17 231 22 19 113 4 11 51 59 9 50 53
% of Volume 76 96 118 84 101 125 91 110 102 122 98 96
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 1.2
Delay / Veh (s) 6.9
Total Stops 626
Travel Dist (mi) 76.6
Travel Time (hr) 4.0
Avg Speed (mph) 19
Vehicles Entered 633
Vehicles Exited 632
Hourly Exit Rate 632
Input Volume 639
% of Volume 99
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D19 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build PM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
51: Galleria East & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 3.3 1.1 2.5 0.2 7.1
Delay / Veh (s) 107.0 3.3 8.4 3.5 9.9
Total Stops 112 38 166 13 329
Travel Dist (mi) 5.0 69.1 31.5 5.0 110.6
Travel Time (hr) 3.6 3.4 3.5 0.5 11.0
Avg Speed (mph) 2 20 12 14 12
Vehicles Entered 113 1198 1082 175 2568
Vehicles Exited 108 1201 1079 176 2564
Hourly Exit Rate 108 1201 1079 176 2564
Input Volume 107 1207 1067 178 2559
% of Volume 101 100 101 99 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 1 0 1
Denied Entry After 2 0 2 0 4
55: 70th Street & Galleria SE Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.3 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.1
Delay! Veh (s) 8.0 8.9 7.2 6.7 7.9 6.3 3.7 3.6 2.6 2.0 6.8
Total Stops 27 112 23 13 90 24 39 57 16 52 453
Travel Dist (mi) 9.3 41.2 8.6 3.4 30.8 9.1 3.7 6.0 2.2 9.8 124.2
Travel Time (hr) 0.6 2.6 0.5 0.2 1.9 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.8 8.3
Avg Speed (mph) 16 17 17 16 16 16 11 11 12 13 15
Vehicles Entered 115 508 106 39 350 103 77 126 41 181 1646
Vehicles Exited 115 507 105 39 348 102 78 126 41 180 1641
Hourly Exit Rate 115 507 105 39 348 102 78 126 41 180 1641
Input Volume 117 505 102 42 360 103 83 118 46 185 1661
% of Volume 98 100 103 93 97 99 94 107 89 97 99
Denied Entry Before 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D20 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
56: 70th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 1.8 1.6 0.8 1.0 1.5 0.2 4.4 19.4 3.5 1.3 9.0 0.5
Delay / Veh (s) 22.9 25.4 17.5 47.0 34.9 22.2 104.4 78.1 79.6 43.2 36.4 9.4
Total Stops 231 158 123 72 123 23 220 818 153 125 696 167
Travel Dist (mi) 27.9 22.4 16.6 6.6 13.7 2.0 8.5 51.4 9.2 5.6 44.7 9.3
Travel Time (hr) 3.1 2.5 1.6 1.3 2.0 0.2 4.7 21.2 4.0 1.6 10.4 0.9
Avg Speed (mph) 9 9 10 5 7 9 3 4 4 4 4 10
Vehicles Entered 283 227 166 75 156 24 151 902 161 112 890 185
Vehicles Exited 280 227 167 76 155 25 151 892 160 113 884 185
Hourly Exit Rate 280 227 167 76 155 25 151 892 160 113 884 185
Input Volume 272 235 164 73 157 23 158 911 163 103 882 190
% of Volume 103 97 102 104 99 109 96 98 98 110 100 97
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15 2 0 0 0
56: 70th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 45.0
Delay! Veh (s) 48.8
Total Stops 2909
Travel Dist (mi) 217.9
Travel Time (hr) 53.5
Avg Speed (mph) 5
Vehicles Entered 3332
Vehicles Exited 3315
Hourly Exit Rate 3315
Input Volume 3331
% of Volume 100
Denied Entry Before 1
Denied Entry After 22
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D21 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.4
Delay / Veh (s) 8.0 7.6 6.3 7.0 2.5 4.7 6.0 2.3 6.1 7.7 4.4 7.1
Total Stops 101 258 29 88 8 17 17 2 8 28 61 617
Travel Dist (mi) 11.6 37.0 3.4 7.6 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 3.3 7.3 74.0
Travel Time (hr) 0.7 2.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 4.2
Avg Speed (mph) 17 18 17 19 20 16 16 17 18 18 19 18
Vehicles Entered 100 367 29 88 8 16 17 2 8 28 61 724
Vehicles Exited 101 367 29 88 8 17 17 2 9 28 61 727
Hourly Exit Rate 101 367 29 88 8 17 17 2 9 28 61 727
Input Volume 98 368 33 86 8 15 15 1 10 27 60 721
% of Volume 103 100 88 102 100 113 113 200 90 104 102 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr) 105.3
Delay / Veh (s) 65.0
Total Stops 8817
Travel Dist (mi) 1903.5
Travel Time (hr) 176.8
Avg Speed (mph) 12
Vehicles Entered 5840
Vehicles Exited 5826
Hourly Exit Rate 5826
Input Volume 25759
% of Volume 23
Denied Entry Before 3
Denied Entry After 26
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D22 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection: 2: 69th Street & CVS limy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T LR LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 40 88 4 31 5 65 31
Average Queue (ft) 4 5 0 3 0 29 6
95th Queue (ft) 23 38 3 17 4 55 27
Link Distance (ft) 162 162 127 119 140
Upstream Blk Time (A) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 50
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Intersection: 3: CVS Dvwy & York Avenue
Movement WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served R T TR T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 40 142 154 77 104
Average Queue (ft) 11 42 43 6 11
95th Queue (ft) 35 130 135 38 58
Link Distance (ft) 104 131 131 107 107
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 12 0 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 4: 69th Street & CVS Drive-Thru Exit
Movement EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served T T TR R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 7 89 100 35 34
Average Queue (ft) 0 10 25 7 4
95th Queue (ft) 5 49 82 28 20
Link Distance (ft) 108 162 162 97 113
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D23 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build PM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T R L LR T T R L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 104 128 77 77 105 131 144 386 405 59 174 303
Average Queue (ft) 39 55 21 9 46 69 62 227 242 16 130 105
95th Queue (ft) 79 98 58 49 92 119 118 344 362 43 199 251
Link Distance (ft) 380 380 380 154 154 154 552 552 552 600
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 10 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 33 1
Intersection: 33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 232
Average Queue (ft) 105
95th Queue (ft) 186
Link Distance (ft) 600
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 39: 69th Street & Southdale SE
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served L T TR L TR R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 98 39 16 62 18 115 50
Average Queue (ft) 43 7 1 15 1 56 23
95th Queue (ft) 80 50 14 41 9 113 50
Link Distance (ft) 776 776 476 193 217
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 024 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection: 40: 69th Street & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 174 408 371 106 124 132 100 169 146 145 277 348
Average Queue (ft) 135 189 160 44 74 102 82 89 90 59 135 180
95th Queue (ft) 203 388 318 96 135 141 119 172 153 120 247 311
Link Distance (ft) 476 476 108 108 107 107 552 552
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 0 1 7 22 2 9 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 1 0 7 25 0 43 34
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 100 100 120
Storage Blk Time (%) 17 8 1 11 17 9 1 8 22
Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 16 1 5 69 11 3 6 35
Intersection: 40: 69th Street & York Avenue
Movement SB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 125
Average Queue (ft) 57
95th Queue (ft) 156
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Intersection: 41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue
Movement EB EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 136 49 71 54 70
Average Queue (ft) 69 17 38 23 37
95th Queue (ft) 121 44 60 39 61
Link Distance (ft) 127 127 385 589 1942
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D25 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build PM Peak Hour
Intersection: 51: Galleria East & York Avenue
Movement EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served R T T T T R
Maximunn Queue (ft) 217 147 172 141 140 91
Average Queue (ft) 99 12 15 61 69 12
95th Queue (ft) 223 74 85 139 152 64
Link Distance (ft) 230 212 212 131 131
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 0 0 1 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 2 6 15
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70
Storage Blk Time (%) 13 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 23 0
Intersection: 55: 70th Street & Galleria SE
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 287 169 114 89
Average Queue (ft) 63 55 46 35
95th Queue (ft) 185 127 86 74
Link Distance (ft) 427 380 196 232
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 56: 70th Street & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR L TR L TTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 105 317 224 217 174 185 328 330 185 234 252 205
Average Queue (ft) 54 94 150 65 100 123 299 302 102 214 222 135
95th Queue (ft) 96 223 238 139 163 205 360 358 196 248 252 263
Link Distance (ft) 380 521 301 301 212 212
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 27 30 20 24 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 118 140 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 160 160 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 2 7 43 0 33 24 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 1 34 68 1 33 45 3
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D26 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build PM Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 95 68 38 56
Average Queue (ft) 58 35 21 32
95th Queue (ft) 84 54 42 46
Link Distance (ft) 521 400 269 589
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 844
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D27 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg
Start Time 11:25 11:25 11:25 11:25 11:25 11:25
End Time 12:30 12:30 12:30 12:30 12:30 12:30
Total Time (min) 65 65 65 65 65 65
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intvls 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 5891 5813 5929 5900 6026 5911
Vehs Exited 5928 5828 5968 5897 6004 5927
Starting Vehs 174 161 200 145 165 160
Ending Vehs 137 146 161 148 187 146
Denied Entry Before 4 4 5 2 3 2
Denied Entry After 4 1 6 3 5 2
Travel Distance (mi) 1915 1891 1924 1896 1944 1914
Travel Time (hr) 172.8 159.4 173.1 165.3 179.5 170.0
Total Delay (hr) 101.1 88.4 100.7 94.2 106.5 98.2
Total Stops 9608 8713 9326 8850 9219 9140
Fuel Used (gal) 104.4 100.5 104.8 102.1 106.5 103.7
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 11:25
End Time 11:30
Total Time (min) 5
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 11:30
End Time 12:30
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg
Vehs Entered 5891 5813 5929 5900 6026 5911
Vehs Exited 5928 5828 5968 5897 6004 5927
Starting Vehs 174 161 200 145 165 160
Ending Vehs 137 146 161 148 187 146
Denied Entry Before 4 4 5 2 3 2
Denied Entry After 4 1 6 3 5 2
Travel Distance (mi) 1915 1891 1924 1896 1944 1914
Travel Time (hr) 172.8 159.4 173.1 165.3 179.5 170.0
Total Delay (hr) 101.1 88.4 100.7 94.2 106.5 98.2
Total Stops 9608 8713 9326 8850 9219 9140
Fuel Used (gal) 104.4 100.5 104.8 102.1 106.5 103.7
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 028 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
2: 69th Street & CVS Dvwy Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2
Delay / Veh (s) 2.4 0.9 0.3 3.3 1.5 4.3 2.6 1.5
Total Stops 3 0 0 3 0 32 16 54
Travel Dist (mi) 0.7 4.3 1.9 0.4 5.8 0.7 0.4 14.2
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.8
Avg Speed (mph) 17 24 18 12 18 9 10 18
Vehicles Entered 18 107 47 14 184 32 16 418
Vehicles Exited 18 107 47 14 184 32 16 418
Hourly Exit Rate 18 107 47 14 184 32 16 418
Input Volume 20 105 45 15 185 35 15 420
% of Volume 90 102 104 93 99 91 107 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3: CVS Dvwy & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 3.1 0.0 1.0 4.2
Delay / Veh (s) 36.3 9.4 5.1 3.5 6.7
Total Stops 8 363 3 72 446
Travel Dist (mi) 0.2 40.8 0.4 43.2 84.6
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 4.3 0.0 2.5 6.9
Avg Speed (mph) 2 10 11 17 12
Vehicles Entered 8 1188 11 1073 2280
Vehicles Exited 8 1184 11 1073 2276
Hourly Exit Rate 8 1184 11 1073 2276
Input Volume 10 1196 10 1070 2286
% of Volume 80 99 110 100 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D29 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
4: 69th Street & CVS Drive-Thru Exit Performance by movement
Movement EBT WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Delay / Veh (s) 1.4 5.6 9.1 2.3 10.3 4.0
Total Stops 0 28 2 8 9 47
Travel Dist (mi) 6.9 8.7 0.5 0.1 0.2 16.4
Travel Time (hr) 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1
Avg Speed (mph) 19 13 9 9 5 14
Vehicles Entered 167 214 12 8 9 410
Vehicles Exited 166 214 12 8 9 409
Hourly Exit Rate 166 214 12 8 9 409
Input Volume 161 221 10 10 10 412
°A of Volume 103 97 120 80 90 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0
33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 1.4 0.3 0.2 2.1 0.6 7.2 0.0 3.0 2.1 0.0 17.0
Delay / Veh (s) 44.7 44.1 5.2 43.6 10.4 21.4 4.1 50.2 11.4 15.1 22.3
Total Stops 108 24 4 157 165 585 22 192 228 1 1486
Travel Dist (mi) 8.4 2.0 7.0 5.3 5.8 134.7 4.7 25.2 75.4 0.2 268.6
Travel Time (hr) 2.0 0.5 0.6 2.5 1.0 11.4 0.2 3.9 4.3 0.0 26.5
Avg Speed (mph) 4 4 14 2 6 12 21 7 18 17 10
Vehicles Entered 117 28 105 178 192 1208 37 218 647 1 2731
Vehicles Exited 115 28 106 176 192 1216 37 218 652 1 2741
Hourly Exit Rate 115 28 106 176 192 1216 37 218 652 1 2741
Input Volume 115 24 99 174 184 1229 36 215 648 1 2725
% of Volume 100 117 107 101 104 99 103 101 101 100 101
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D30 York Avenue/691h Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
39: 69th Street & Southdale SE Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.5
Delay / Veh (s) 10.4 2.2 1.4 6.4 2.2 2.2 4.7 3.2 4.1
Total Stops 89 3 0 31 7 7 161 41 339
Travel Dist (mi) 32.3 57.7 8.2 7.0 31.6 10.8 6.0 1.7 155.2
Travel Time (hr) 1.8 2.2 0.3 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.2 7.5
Avg Speed (mph) 21 28 26 17 22 20 9 11 22
Vehicles Entered 218 388 55 64 296 97 161 41 1320
Vehicles Exited 218 388 55 64 297 98 161 41 1322
Hourly Exit Rate 218 388 55 64 297 98 161 41 1322
Input Volume 215 397 54 64 311 100 157 37 1335
% of Volume 101 98 102 100 95 98 103 111 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40: 69th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 4.5 2.6 1.7 0.6 3.2 1.0 2.0 3.2 0.1 0.6 5.9 0.8
Delay / Veh (s) 71.6 56.1 39.5 48.3 106.3 51.5 47.1 12.0 10.0 47.7 24.2 14.8
Total Stops 296 92 152 50 99 67 152 333 12 56 578 82
Travel Dist (mi) 23.3 13.5 15.9 1.4 3.4 2.2 4.8 29.4 0.9 5.2 95.2 20.0
Travel Time (hr) 5.5 3.1 2.4 0.7 3.3 1.1 2.2 4.0 0.1 0.8 8.9 1.5
Avg Speed (mph) 4 4 7 2 1 2 2 7 7 6 11 15
Vehicles Entered 227 166 156 45 108 71 156 949 29 48 878 199
Vehicles Exited 227 166 156 45 107 71 155 947 29 48 873 199
Hourly Exit Rate 227 166 156 45 107 71 155 947 29 48 873 199
Input Volume 230 164 160 50 106 75 160 960 30 45 860 210
% of Volume 99 101 98 90 101 95 97 99 97 107 102 95
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
40: 69th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 26.2
Delay / Veh (s) 31.2
Total Stops 1969
Travel Dist (mi) 215.3
Travel Time (hr) 33.7
Avg Speed (mph) 7
Vehicles Entered 3032
Vehicles Exited 3023
Hourly Exit Rate 3023
Input Volume 3050
% of Volume 99
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 1
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study 031 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Delay / Veh (s) 5.3 6.6 2.6 5.3 6.4 3.4 5.8 7.0 3.7 5.5 6.8 3.6
Total Stops 15 225 24 21 110 5 9 49 62 8 46 58
Travel Dist (mi) 0.4 5.3 0.5 1.7 9.1 0.4 1.1 6.1 7.7 3.0 16.9 21.5
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.8
Avg Speed (mph) 9 9 10 18 18 19 18 19 19 25 26 26
Vehicles Entered 17 237 24 21 110 5 9 50 62 8 46 59
Vehicles Exited 17 237 24 21 110 5 9 50 62 8 46 58
Hourly Exit Rate 17 237 24 21 110 5 9 50 62 8 46 58
Input Volume 17 227 22 19 113 4 11 51 59 9 50 53
% of Volume 100 104 109 111 97 125 82 98 105 89 92 109
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 1.0
Delay! Veh (s) 5.8
Total Stops 632
Travel Dist (mi) 73.7
Travel Time (hr) 3.8
Avg Speed (mph) 20
Vehicles Entered 648
Vehicles Exited 647
Hourly Exit Rate 647
Input Volume 635
% of Volume 102
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D32 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
51: Galleria East & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR AH
Total Delay (hr) 1.4 1.7 1.9 0.1 5.1
Delay / Veh (s) 51.5 5.1 6.4 2.0 7.2
Total Stops 100 126 178 13 417
Travel Dist (nip 4.5 69.2 34.5 5.5 113.7
Travel Time (hr) 1.7 4.0 2.9 0.4 9.1
Avg Speed (mph) 3 17 13 14 13
Vehicles Entered 101 1208 1081 172 2562
Vehicles Exited 98 1201 1080 172 2551
Hourly Exit Rate 98 1201 1080 172 2551
Input Volume 107 1207 1067 178 2559
% of Volume 92 100 101 97 100
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0
55: 70th Street & Galleria SE Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.2 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 2.8
Delay / Veh (s) 6.4 7.9 5.9 5.9 7.8 6.6 3.2 2.6 2.7 2.2 6.2
Total Stops 22 97 17 10 93 24 39 44 17 59 422
Travel Dist (mi) 9.5 41.1 8.1 4.1 32.1 8.4 3.8 5.3 2.4 9.9 124.7
Travel Time (hr) 0.6 2.5 0.5 0.3 2.0 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.8 8.0
Avg Speed (mph) 18 17 18 16 16 16 12 12 12 13 16
Vehicles Entered 117 507 100 46 364 94 80 111 44 181 1644
Vehicles Exited 117 508 100 47 365 95 80 111 44 182 1649
Hourly Exit Rate 117 508 100 47 365 95 80 111 44 182 1649
Input Volume 117 505 102 42 360 103 83 118 46 185 1661
% of Volume 100 101 98 112 101 92 96 94 96 98 99
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D33 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
56: 70th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Total Delay (hr) 1.8 1.7 0.8 0.9 1.6 0.2 3.7 14.0 2.4 1.3 7.0 0.4
Delay / Veh (s) 23.6 26.4 18.8 52.1 37.9 25.6 85.4 55.2 53.2 48.5 28.4 7.5
Total Stops 221 164 118 64 130 20 223 795 147 109 583 143
Travel Dist (mi) 26.4 23.3 16.2 5.6 13.2 1.9 8.9 52.5 9.1 5.0 44.7 9.9
Travel Time (hr) 3.0 2.7 1.7 1.2 2.1 0.2 4.0 15.8 2.8 1.6 8.4 0.9
Avg Speed (mph) 9 9 10 5 7 8 3 4 4 3 5 11
Vehicles Entered 267 234 163 66 155 22 155 911 159 100 883 196
Vehicles Exited 267 234 162 64 152 21 156 920 160 100 894 195
Hourly Exit Rate 267 234 162 64 152 21 156 920 160 100 894 195
Input Volume 272 235 164 73 157 23 158 911 163 103 882 190
% of Volume 98 100 99 88 97 91 99 101 98 97 101 103
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
56: 70th Street & York Avenue Performance by movement
Movement All
Total Delay (hr) 35.9
Delay / Veh (s) 38.9
Total Stops 2717
Travel Dist (mi) 216.9
Travel Time (hr) 44.3
Avg Speed (mph) 6
Vehicles Entered 3311
Vehicles Exited 3325
Hourly Exit Rate 3325
Input Volume 3331
% of Volume 100
Denied Entry Before 0
Denied Entry After 1
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D34 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
SimTraffic Performance Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.4
Delay / Veh (s) 7.9 7.7 6.4 6.9 2.6 4.6 6.0 2.1 6.3 7.7 4.3 7.1
Total Stops 96 258 33 77 8 15 17 2 10 27 59 602
Travel Dist (mi) 11.1 36.6 3.8 6.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.1 1.1 3.3 7.2 72.4
Travel Time (hr) 0.6 2.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 4.1
Avg Speed (nriph) 17 18 17 19 21 16 16 16 18 18 19 18
Vehicles Entered 96 363 33 77 8 14 17 1 9 27 60 705
Vehicles Exited 96 363 33 77 8 15 17 2 10 27 59 707
Hourly Exit Rate 96 363 33 77 8 15 17 2 10 27 59 707
Input Volume 98 368 33 86 8 15 15 1 10 27 60 721
% of Volume 98 99 100 90 100 100 113 200 100 100 98 98
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr) 98.2
Delay / Veh (s) 59.7
Total Stops 9140
Travel Dist (mi) 1914.0
Travel Time (hr) 170.0
Avg Speed (mph) 12
Vehicles Entered 5911
Vehicles Exited 5927
Hourly Exit Rate 5927
Input Volume 26123
% of Volume 23
Denied Entry Before 2
Denied Entry After 2
Spack Consulting SinnTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D35 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 2: 69th Street & CVS Dvwy
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB
Directions Served L T TR L TR LR
Maximum Queue (ft) 39 6 4 36 6 58
Average Queue (ft) 3 0 0 3 0 25
95th Queue (ft) 20 4 3 17 4 49
Link Distance (ft) 162 162 127 119
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 50
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Intersection: 3: CVS Dvwy & York Avenue
Movement WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served R T TR T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 43 161 173 118 120
Average Queue (ft) 8 115 119 24 29
95th Queue (ft) 31 182 190 94 107
Link Distance (ft) 104 131 131 107 107
Upstream Blk Time (%) 12 13 2 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 71 76 8 16
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 4: 69th Street & CVS Drive-Thru Exit
Movement WB WB NB SB
Directions Served T TR R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 83 103 35 34
Average Queue (ft) 9 26 7 8
95th Queue (ft) 42 79 29 30
Link Distance (ft) 162 162 97 113
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D36 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L L T R L LR T TR L T
Maximum Queue (ft) 92 119 64 68 114 149 150 402 413 96 174 278
Average Queue (ft) 39 56 25 5 50 78 64 211 235 18 130 86
95th Queue (ft) 78 98 61 38 95 131 119 350 372 65 193 212
Link Distance (ft) 380 380 380 154 154 154 552 552 552 600
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 10 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 33 0
Intersection: 33: Southdale East Exit & York Avenue
Movement SB
Directions Served TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 207
Average Queue (ft) 99
95th Queue (ft) 177
Link Distance (ft) 600
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 39: 69th Street & Southdale SE
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR R R
Maximum Queue (ft) 112 48 7 49 115 13 89 67
Average Queue (ft) 41 2 0 12 4 0 50 25
95th Queue (ft) 81 27 4 36 81 6 79 51
Link Distance (ft) 776 776 476 476 193 217
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 155 140
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D37 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
Intersection: 40: 69th Street & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T TR L T T
Maximum Queue (ft) 174 418 342 106 118 135 100 183 146 130 358 411
Average Queue (ft) 146 161 136 44 79 101 90 134 116 43 168 222
95th Queue (ft) 203 371 260 97 132 141 117 184 144 96 298 364
Link Distance (ft) 476 476 108 108 107 107 552 552
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 9 22 2 26 24
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 0 10 25 0 148 135
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 150 100 100 120
Storage Blk Time (%) 25 2 1 14 16 26 0 14 29
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 4 1 7 78 42 0 6 60
Intersection: 40: 69th Street & York Avenue
Movement SB
Directions Served
Maximum Queue (ft) 125
Average Queue (ft) 69
95th Queue (ft) 169
Link Distance (ft)
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1
Intersection: 41: 69th Street & Xerxes Avenue
Movement EB EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 117 50 66 49 67
Average Queue (ft) 65 18 37 23 35
95th Queue (ft) 101 45 58 35 57
Link Distance (ft) 127 127 385 589 1942
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D38 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
Intersection: 51: Galleria East & York Avenue
Movement EB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served R T T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 178 196 205 147 155 94
Average Queue (ft) 70 47 51 58 64 12
95th Queue (ft) 165 138 148 157 164 64
Link Distance (ft) 230 212 212 131 131
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 0 5 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 2 25 31
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 70
Storage Blk Time (%) 9 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 0
Intersection: 55: 70th Street & Galleria SE
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 224 189 89 89
Average Queue (ft) 58 57 39 40
95th Queue (ft) 156 128 73 80
Link Distance (ft) 427 380 196 232
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 56: 70th Street & York Avenue
Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L LTR LTR L TTR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 112 381 225 213 174 185 325 336 184 243 264 205
Average Queue (ft) 52 99 154 59 98 135 292 297 87 188 197 99
95th Queue (ft) 93 255 239 142 165 210 369 367 172 274 274 226
Link Distance (ft) 380 521 301 301 212 212
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 22 22 13 15 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 0 75 86 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 160 160 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 2 8 36 1 20 15 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 1 2 36 57 2 21 28 2
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D39 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Appendix D - Queuing Analysis Backup
Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Build Sat Peak Hour
CVS Pharmacy @ 69th St / York Ave
Intersection: 57: 70th Street & Xerxes Avenue
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 96 60 29 60
Average Queue (ft) 61 33 20 33
95th Queue (ft) 88 50 41 50
Link Distance (ft) 521 400 269 589
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1138
Spack Consulting SimTraffic Report
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study D40 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Sys: 04
Route: 27000031 (001+00.307)
050340047 12/13/2004 1901
COUrIty:Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 05
Route: 11050159 (000+00.470)
042190088 03/06/2004 1430
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
I Unit 1 I
!nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
WEST
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
051
NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED
SeVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO First Harmul Event:NOT SPECIFIED
Roadway Type:NOT SPECIFIED Relation to Junction:NoT SPECIFIED
Type of CraSh:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:NOT APPLICABLE
Surface Conditions: DRY Speed Limit:30
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:oFFicER REPORTED THAT
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR Investigating Officer:NOT SPECIFIED
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED Reliability of Info:CONFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
I Unit 2 I
WEST
VEHICLE - MAKING RIGHT
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
025
NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED
I Unit 3 I
lieLolVeLLO LI ILLy2207
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN PAP:Crash Detail Report
IllIH
SeVerity:INJURY - INCAPACITATING
Roadway Type:2 LANES--1 EACH WAY
Type of CreSh:COLLISION WITH PEDESTRIAN
Surface Conditions:DRY
Light Conditions:DARK - STREET LIGHTS ON
Weather Cond 1: CLEAR
Weather Cond 2:NoT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 01
First Harmul Event:oN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:T-INTERSECTION
Traffic Cont. Device:NOT APPLICABLE
Speed Limit:30
Diagram Location:RIGHT ANGLE
Investigating Officer:NoT SPECIFIED
Reliability of Irlf0:CONFIDENT
Unit 1 Unit 2 I Unit 3 I
SOUTH 98
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT 36
PASSENGER CAR PEDESTRIAN
035 061
M M
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
DRIVER INATTENTION OR PEDESTRIAN VIOLATION OR
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Appendix E - Crash Reports
4/19/2010 Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 1 of 9
El CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Severity:INJURY - POSSIBLE INJURY
RoadwayType:OTHER DIVIDED HIGHWAY
TypeofCrash:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions:icE / PACKED SNOW
LightCondftions:DARK - STREET LIGHTS ON
VVeatherCondl:SLEET, HAIL, OR FREEZING
Weather Cond 2:NoT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
FirstNannulEventoN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4-LEGGED INTERSECTION
Traffic Cont. Device:TRAFEIc SIGNALS
Speed Limit:35
Diagram Location:REAR END
Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of InfO:CONFIDENT
I Unit 1 1 I Unit 2 I Unit 3 I
SOUTH SOUTH
VEHICLE - STARTING IN VEHICLE - STARTING IN
PASSENGER CAR PASSENGER CAR
047 039
F M
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
DRIVER INATTENTION OR NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender
Driver Cond
Drivr Contr 1
Drivr Contr 2:
Severfty:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
Roadway Type:2 LANES--1 EACH WAY
Type ofCrash:coLLisioN WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions:DRY
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR
Weather Cond 2:NoT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
FirstNannulEventoN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4 -LEGGED INTERSECTION
Traffic Cont. Device:sToP SIGN - ALL APPROACHES
Speed Limit:30
Diagram Location:RIGHT ANGLE
Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of Info:CONFIDENT
I Unit 1 I Unit 2
- GOING STRAIGHT
Unit 3 j
EAST
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
SOUTH
VEHICLE
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE PASSENGER CAR
028 092
F F
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
DRIVER INATTENTION OR NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender
Driver Cond
Drivr Contr 1
Drivr Contr 2
Rep. Verso'. I 111,1,2007
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN /It Crash Detail Report
LIIIID
050680141 03/08/2005 1658
COunty:Hennepin Cfty:EDINA
Sys: 09
Route: 27000031 (001+00.273)
043560004 12/20/2009 1925
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.273)
Appendix E - Crash Reports
4/19/2010
Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 2 of 9
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study E2 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
SeVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO First Harmul Event:oN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Roadway Type: OTHER Relation to Junction:INTERsEcr ION-RELATED
Type of Crash:coLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. DeViCe:TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Surface Conditions:wEr Speed Limit:30
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:REAR END
Weather Cond 1:cLouDY Investigating Officer:Nor SPECIFIED
Weather Cond 2:N0r SPECIFIED Reliability of Info:coNFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
Unit 1 I Unit 21 [ Unit 3 I
EAST EAST
VEHICLE - MAKING LEFT TURN VEHICLE - SLOWING IN
PASSENGER CAR PASSENGER CAR
039 028
F M
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
DRIVER INATTENTION OR NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration:
Driver Age
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Crash Detail Report
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
R V WyM.
051600177 05/16/2005 1656
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 05
Route: 11050159 (000+00.467)
Appendix E - Crash Reports
052970095 07/28/2005 1240 Sys: 04
County: Hennepin City:EDINA Route:27000031 (001+00.282)
SeVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO First Harmul Event:Nor SPECIFIED
Roadway Type:Nor SPECIFIED Relation to Junction:NoT SPECIFIED
Type of CraSh:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Surface Conditions: DRY Speed Limit:30
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:REAR END
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR Investigating Officer:NoT SPECIFIED
Weather Cond 2:N0r SPECIFIED Reliability of Info:CONFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
Configuration:
Driver Age
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
lnit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 1
SOUTH
VEHICLE - STOPPED IN
SOUTH
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
PASSENGER CAR OTHER MOTOR VEHICLE TYPE
047 893
F F
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
4/19/2010
Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 3 of 9
E3 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study
Severity:PRoPERTY DAMAGE - NO FirstHantlulEventNOT SPECIFIED
Roadway Type:NoT SPECIFIED Relation to Junction:NoT SPECIFIED
TypeofCrash:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:sToR SIGN - OTHER
Surface Conditions: DRY Speed Limit:00
Light Conditions:DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:REAR END
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR Investigating OfficerNoT SPECIFIED
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED Reliability of Info:coNFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
Unit 1 I I Unit 2 I I Unit 3 I
NORTH
VEHICLE - MAKING LEFT TURN
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
00
VEHICLE - MAKING LEFT TURN
UNKNOWN
075 032
M M
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender
Driver Cond
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Severity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
ROadwayType:OTHER DIVIDED HIGHWAY
TypeotCtaSh:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions: WET
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT
Weather Cond 1: CLOUDY
Weather Cond 2: CLOUDY
Number of Vehicles: 02
FirstHannulEventON THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4-LEGGED INTERSECTION
Traffic Cont. Device:TRAFEIc SIGNALS
Speed Limit:35
Diagram Location:RIGHT ANGLE
Investigating Officer:LOCAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of Into:CONFIDENT
Unit 1 I Unit 2 I Unit 3 I
SOUTH WEST
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
PASSENGER CAR VAN OR MINIVAN
028 090
Ivi F
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
!nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
060040130 01/04/2006 1008
County:Hennepin CHy:EDINA
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.273)
Crash Detail Report
LIM Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
060370121 12/30/2005 1230
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 05
Route: 11050159 (000+00.442)
Appendix E - Crash Reports
4/19/2010 Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 4 of 9
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study E4
York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Unit 1
!nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2: DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.273)
060180398 01/18/2006 1252
COUllty:Hennepin City:EDINA
SeVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
Roadway Type:OTHER DIVIDED HIGHWAY
Type of Crash:coLLisioN WITH MOTOR
Surface Conditions: DRY
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT
Weather Cond 1:CLOUDY
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
First Hannul EventoN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4-LEGGED INTERSECTION
VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:TRAFEic SIGNALS
Speed Limit:35
Diagram Location:REAR END
Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of MfixCONFIDENT
Unit 1
NORTH !nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender
Driver Cond
Drivr Contr 1
Drivr Contr 2:
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.287)
061600172 05/27/2006 2236
County: Hennepin City:EDINA
Fe.Version 1.11..,1001
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
052
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
DRIVER INATTENTION OR
NOT SPECIFIED
Crash Detail Report
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
I Unit 2 I
NORTH
VEHICLE - STOPPED IN
PASSENGER CAR
079
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
NOT SPECIFIED
I Unit 3 I
SOUTH
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
PASSENGER CAR
018
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF
SeVetity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
Roadway Type:4-6 LANES UNDIVIDED (2 TO 3
Type of Crash:coLLisioN WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions: DRY
Light Conditions: DARK - STREET LIGHTS ON
Weather Cond 1: CLEAR
Weather Cond 2!N0T SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
First Hannul EventoN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4-LEGGED INTERSECTION
Traffic Cont. DeViCe:TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Speed Limit:35
Diagram Location:LEFT TURN
Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of InfO:CONFIDENT
Unit 2
WEST
VEHICLE - MAKING LEFT TURN
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
045
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
NOT SPECIFIED
Unit 3
Appendix E - Crash Reports
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study E5 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
4/19/2010
Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 5 of 9
Sys: 05
Route: 11050159 (000+00.470)
070290287 12/07/2006 1735
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 04
Route: 27000031 (001+00.287)
063530351 12/12/2006 1952
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
Unit 1
!nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2: FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF
Ile,IVen. II May 2007
WEST
16
PASSENGER CAR
022
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
Crash Detail Report
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
Unit 2
NORTH
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
PASSENGER CAR
020
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
NOT SPECIFIED
Unit 3
SOVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
Roadway Type:NoT SPECIFIED
Type of CraSh:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions: DRY
Light COnditiOnS:DARK - STREET LIGHTS ON
Weather Cond 1: CLEAR
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
First Harmul Event:NoT SPECIFIED
Relation to JunctionvoT SPECIFIED
Traffic Cont. Device:TRARRic SIGNALS
Speed Limit:00
Diagram Location:REAR END
Investigating OfficerNoT SPECIFIED
Reliability of InfO:CONFIDENT
Unit 1 Unit 2 I Unit 3 1
EAST
VEHICLE - SLOWING IN
EAST
VEHICLE - STOPPED IN
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
027 038
M M
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
SeVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
Roadway Type:2 LANES--1 EACH WAY
Type of Crash:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions:DRY
Light Conditions:DARK - STREET LIGHTS ON
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
First Harmul Event:oN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4-LEGGED INTERSECTION
Traffic Cont. Device:sToR SIGN - ALL APPROACHES
Speed Limit:30
Diagram Location:RIGHT ANGLE
Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of Info:coNRIDENT
Appendix E - Crash Reports
4/19/2010 Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 6 of 9
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study E6 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Sys: 04
Route: 27000031 (001+00.301)
063570107 12/23/2006 1506
COUnty:Hennepin City:EDINA
NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.287)
071500261 04/09/2007 1320
COUnty:Hennepin City:EDINA
NOT
NOT
NOT
SPECIFIED
SPECIFIED
SPECIFIED
Vers. 1 11/a, .07
Crash Detail Report
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
First Harmul Event:oN THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
Relation to Junction:4-LEGGED INTERSECTION
MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:YIELD SIGN
Speed Limit:35
Diagram Location:REAR END
Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Reliability of Info:CONFIDENT
Severity:INJuRY - POSSIBLE INJURY
Roadway Type:OTHER DIVIDED HIGHWAY
Type of Crash:COLLISION WITH
Surface Conditions:DRY
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT
Weather Cond 1:CL0DDY
Weather Cond 2:NoT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
'nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Unit 1
SOUTH
VEHICLE - MAKING RIGHT
PASSENGER CAR
049
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
DRIVER INATTENTION OR
IMPROPER PARKING,
I Unit 2
SOUTH
VEHICLE - MAKING RIGHT
PASSENGER CAR
054
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
NOT SPECIFIED
I Unit 3 I
Severity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO
Roadway Type:NoT SPECIFIED
Type of CraSh:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE
Surface Conditions: DRY
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED
Number of Vehicles: 02
First Harmul Event:NOT SPECIFIED
Relation to Junction:NoT SPECIFIED
Traffic Cont. Device:TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Speed Limit:00
Diagram Location:oFFicER LEFT FIELD BLANK
Investigating Officer:NoT SPECIFIED
Reliability of Info:coNFIDENT
!nit Tray Dir:
Veh Action:
Configuration:
Driver Age:
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Conte 2:
Unit 1
WEST
VEHICLE - MAKING LEFT TURN
VAN OR MINIVAN
076
NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED
Unit 2
EAST
VEHICLE - PARKED ILLEGALLY
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
040
[ Unit 3
Appendix E - Crash Reports
4/19/2010 Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 7 of 9
E7 CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.273)
082620051 07/16/2008 9998
County:Hennepin City:EDINA
Rep.1 Venxn may NW
Crash Detail Report
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
Severity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO First Harmul Event:NOT SPECIFIED
Roadway Type:NoT SPECIFIED Relation to JunctionvoT SPECIFIED
Type of Crash:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:NoT APPLICABLE
Surface Conditions: DRY Speed Limit:30
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:LEFT TURN
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR Investigating Officer:NOT SPECIFIED
Weather Cond 2:NoT SPECIFIED Reliability of Info:CONFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
I Unit 1 I I Unit 2 I Unit 3
00 00
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT 00
PASSENGER CAR UNKNOWN
068 896
F Z
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender:
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Severity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO First Harmul Event:NoT SPECIFIED
Roadway Type:NoT SPECIFIED Relation to Juncflon:NoT SPECIFIED
Type of Crash:COLLISION WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Surface Conditions: DRY Speed Limit:30
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:REAR END
Weather Cond 1:CLEAR Investigating Officer:NoT SPECIFIED
Weather Cond 2:NOT SPECIFIED Reliability of Info:coNFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3
SOUTH
VEHICLE - MAKING RIGHT
SOUTH
VEHICLE - MAKING RIGHT
PASSENGER CAR SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
060 040
F M
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
NOT SPECIFIED NOT SPECIFIED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration:
Driver Age
Driver Gender.
Driver Cond:
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Appendix E - Crash Reports
082770231 08/18/2008 1215
County: Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 04
Route: 27000031 (001+00.273)
4/19/2010 Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0
Page: 8 of 9
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study E8 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
SeVerity:PROPERTY DAMAGE - NO FhlOtHannUIEVentON THE ROADWAY (ALLEY,
ftadMialiType:OTHER DIVIDED HIGHWAY Relation to Junction:LI-LEGGED INTERSECTION
Type ofCrash:coLLisioN WITH MOTOR VEHICLE Traffic Cont. Device:TEAFEic SIGNALS
Surface Conditions: SNOW Speed Limit:35
Light Conditions: DAYLIGHT Diagram Location:EIGHT ANGLE
Weather Cond 1:CL000Y Investigating Officer:LocAL (CITY POLICE)
Weather Gond 2: SNOW Reliability of InfO:CONFIDENT
Number of Vehicles: 02
I Unit 1 I
- GOING STRAIGHT
1 Unit 2 1 1 Unit 3 I
SOUTH
VEHICLE
EAST
VEHICLE - GOING STRAIGHT
SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE
052 026
F F
NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR NORMAL - NO DRUGS OR
NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL
NO CLEAR CONTRIBUTING ILLEGAL OR UNSAFE SPEED
!nit Tray Dir
Veh Action
Configuration
Driver Age
Driver Gender
Driver Cond
Drivr Contr 1:
Drivr Contr 2:
Crash Detail Report
Crash Report -York Ave/69th St in Edina, MN
fte,IVe-rs.. I 1 May 2007
0900203.08 12/17/2008 0915
COLulty:Hennepin City:EDINA
Sys: 04
Route:27000031 (001+00.276)
Appendix E - Crash Reports
4/19/2010 Mapping Analysis Tool 3.7.0 Page: 9 of 9
CVS Pharmacy Traffic Impact Study E9 York Avenue/69th Street - Edina, MN
Jack Sullivan
From: City Extra [cityextra@email-services.info]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:41 PM
To: Jack Sullivan
Subject: W. 70th St: TH 100 to France Ave Project Update
May 12, 2010
Dear Resident:
Here is an update on the status of this project.
Construction Status:
The Edina City Council authorized the creation of bid documents for this project at the December 15, 2009,
City Council Meeting. The consultant for this project, WSB, Inc., has completed the final design and submitted
the project to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) for approval. During the MNDOT review
they informed the City that a variance for parking lane width will be required for MNDOT approval. The
process for attaining this variance will delay the construction start of the project. We should know on June 24 if
the variance has been approved. After that date, we will send out another update with a potential construction
schedule. We do know that with this delay construction will extend into the summer of 2011.
The City Council was notified of the variance request at their May 4, 2010, City Council Meeting. The staff
report and the City Council meeting can be viewed on Watch a Program segment of the City of Edina website
at: http://www.cityofedina.com/departments/WatchaMeeting.htm.
Center Point Energy (CPE) has started to replace the gas services located along West 70 th Street. We will be
asking CPE to restore the boulevards within the next couple of weeks due to the delay in schedule. They will
also be rehabilitating the joints of a steel gas main that runs along West 70 th Street; the construction schedule
for this work will be identified in future mailings.
Communication
We have multiple ways of communicating with property owners before, during, and after construction projects.
The most frequently used method is the City Extra e-mail notification service. This service is free and allows
individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service
go to the City Extra website at http://cityextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to "West
70th Street - TH 100 to France Avenue" . Please contact the City at 952-927-8861 if you are having trouble
signing up for City Extra.
Once the project is underway, we will update the City Extra e-mail notification system on a weekly basis. These
updates will cover things you need to know for the following week's schedule such as water shut off, parking
restrictions, etc; it will also cover weekly street reconstruction highlights. All property owners, including those
signed up for the e-mail notification system will continue to receive paper copies of the construction update
letters by regular mail on a monthly basis.
Thank you,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
1
Visit www.cityofedina.com to update your City Extra e-mail subscriptions.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No.
From: Boyd Tate
Traffic Safety Coordinator
Action
Discussion
Information
X
Date: April 20, 2010
Subject: Traffic Safety Review for April 7,2010.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, April 7, 2010.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:
It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting
regarding any of the attached issues.
ATTACHMENTS:
Traffic Safety Review for April 7, 2010.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on April 7, 2010. Staff present
included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety
Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Police Traffic Supervisor.
From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed
with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or
have additional facts to present, they can be included on the April 20, 2010, Council
Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which staff recommends approval of request:
1. Request from staff to remove the stop sign located on east bound West
49th Street at Westbrook Lane to conform to city policy.
West 49th Street runs east from Brookside Avenue where it makes a
ninety-degree turn and becomes Westbrook Lane (this is not an
intersection). This sign stops east bound traffic on West 49th Street. The
stop sign that currently exists at this turn in the roadway was installed in
1971 for unknown reasons and does not meet policy warrants. This stop
sign needed to be repaired a total of six times this past winter due to being
struck by snow plows (both city and private). The only accident reported
in this area since 2001 is a single vehicle leaving the roadway and striking
a fence (06-14-2007).
Staff would like to replace this sign with a center stripe on the roadway to
define the driving lanes and also install an advisory sign with a ninety-
degree arrow. The removal of this stop sign would bring this section of
roadway back into compliance with city policy. Staff feels that safety
would actually be enhanced with these changes.
Staff recommends the removal of the stop sign located on east bound
West 49th Street and add center lane striping to define traffic lanes as
well as install an advisory sign with a ninety-degree arrow.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 6
April 7, 2010
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\Traffie Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries\ 10 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety
Review 04-07-10
2. Request from staff to replace the temporary "No Parking" signs on
Merilane Avenue with permanent ones until all construction projects on
this block are complete.
A massive tear-down/rebuild home construction project has been
underway for the past 11/2 years on Merilane Avenue just north of
Paddock Road. Construction workers on this project were parking their
personal vehicles on Merialne Avenue causing this very narrow street to
narrow even further. Staff has counted as many at 12-15 vehicles parked
on both sides of Merilane Avenue on any given day.
The requestor (neighbor) called staff in April of 2009 with concerns about
the narrowing of Merilane Avenue. The requestor had concerns about
emergency vehicles being able to get through and also that two cars could
not meet in this area. Requestor was also concerned about the safety of
residents who walk and bike in the area.
As a result of this request, staff placed temporary "No Parking 7 a.m. — 4
p.m. Mon.-Fri." signs on the west side of Merilane Avenue from #18 north
to # 20 Merilane Avenue. The requestor was advised that these temporary
signs would stay up until the project was complete.
A new permit has now been issued (March 2010) for a tear-down/rebuild
for the home directly across the street from the one currently under
construction (#11 Merilane Avenue). The requestor has renewed her
traffic safety concerns because now there will be two major projects
taking place simultaneously.
Staff, along with the Edina Police Department, agreed that the east side of
Merilane Avenue needed to be posted the same as the west side. The on-
site construction workers would be able to park their personal vehicles on
Paddock Lane leaving Merilane Avenue open to through traffic.
Temporary signs were then put up. Demolition is now underway at #11
Merilane Avenue.
On April 5, 2010, the requestor infonned staff that the construction
workers had taken down one or more of the temporary signs and were
parking their vehicles in that area.
Temporary signs need to be changed out every couple of weeks in order to
keep them looking professional due to weather conditions and are subject
to being pulled out of the ground by vandals.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 6
April 7, 2010
GAEngineering\Infrastructure\Streets \ Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 04-07-10
Staff is recommending that the temporary signs be replaced with
permanent ones until all construction is completed in this area. Once
construction is complete, the signs will be removed and the street will be
returned to its original form.
Staff recommends that the temporary "No Parking 7 am — 4 pm
Mon.-Fri." signs be replaced with permanent ones unill all
construction projects are completed on Merilane Avenue.
SECTION B:
Requests on which staff recommends denial of request:
1. Request from South View Middle School to restrict parking on South
View Lane from the school's west parking lot exit to the service drive on
the south side of the roadway.
This request comes from the School's Equity. He would like to see the
currently unrestricted area in front of the activities building restricted to
"No Parking 4 pm — 6 pm Mon.-Fri." The school would like to use this
area for the late busses that come at 4:40, 4:45 and 5:15 to pick up
students who stay late for school activities. The busses currently pick up
students in the "half-moon" drive located directly in front of the school.
This semi-circle is located on school property and off of the street.
South View Middle School is divided into two areas; the academic side
(east building) and the activities side (west building). The requestor states
that the academic side is locked down once the school day is over and the
school staff are trying to discourage students from hanging around this
building. Moving the late bus pickup to the street in front of the activities
building would help keep the students away from the front of the academic
building.
There is a parking lot on the west side of the activities building with a
pick-up/drop-off area that would be better suited for late bus pick-ups.
This off-street area would not only be much safer but would also keep
students away from the academic side of the campus.
The above alternative was discussed with the requestor. He stated that the
bus drivers do not like using the parking lot because it is difficult to turn
from the lot onto South View Lane.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 6
April 7, 2010
WEngineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \ Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review SummariesU 0 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 04-07-10
Staff has looked at all of the schools in the City and with the exception of
the French Emersion School, all busses pick up students in off-street areas.
Staff feels that using the parking lot for late bus pick-ups is a safe solution
and that this request be denied.
Staff recommends denial of the request to restrict parking on South
View Lane, in front of the activities building, on the south side of the
roadway, to No Parking 4 — 6 pm Mon. — Fri. for the above stated
reasons.
2. Request to install guardrail fencing on the east side of Olinger Boulevard
to protect the yards of homes at 6133, 6137 and 6141 Sherman Circle.
The requestor is a resident on Sherman Circle with a back yard that abuts
Olinger Boulevard. Requestor states that each year her yard, as well as the
yards of her neighbors, are damaged by cars driving over them after
making U-turns from across the street at Bredesen Park. Requestor states
that each spring she has to fill in the ruts in her yard and reseed. She has
also had to replace a small tree that was run over.
Olinger Boulevard is a 32-foot wide state aid street with curb, gutter and
no sidewalks. The existing curbing is surmountable which makes it easy
to drive over. Vehicles parked on the west side of Olinger Boulevard
often make U-turns to go north on Olinger to Vernon Avenue. This
roadway is wide enough to accommodate these turns but vehicles
sometimes drive over the curb and onto the residents' lawn.
Staff feels that placing guardrail fencing in this area in not appropriate.
Staff has sent the requestor a petition form to request that the existing
surmountable curb be replaced with a bulkhead style curb be on the east
side of Olinger Boulevard from Sherman Circle north to Vernon Avenue.
This would eliminate the problem and state funds would cover the
expense.
Staff recommends the denial of the request to install guardrail fencing
on this section of Olinger Boulevard and instead replace the existing
surmountable curb with bulkhead style curbing
3. Request for an All-Way Stop at Tracy Avenue and McGuire Road. A
Two-Way Stop is currently in place for east/west McGuire Road traffic.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 6
April 7, 2010
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffie\Traffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries\ 10 TSAC & Min\Traffie Safety
Review 04-07-10
This request comes from a resident on the 6700 block of Galway Drive.
Requestor states that her children cross Tracy Avenue at McGuire Road
and that cars frequently ignore the 30 mph speed limit on this stretch of
roadway. She feels that making this intersection an All-Way Stop would
slow down traffic.
Tracy Avenue is a 30-foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no
sidewalks. The Monday-Friday average daily traffic count is 1,501
vehicles with an 85th-percentile speed of 33.2 mph. There have been no
reported accidents since 2001 on this stretch of Tracy Avenue and there
are no sightline problems (traffic study September 2007).
City policy warrants are not met for an All-Way Stop at this intersection.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for an All-Way Stop at the
intersection of Tracy Avenue and McGuire Road for lack of warrants.
3. Request for an All-Way Stop at the intersection of Tingdale Avenue and
West 59th Street. A two way stop currently exists for east/west West 59th
Street traffic.
This request comes from a resident on Tingdale Avenue who is concerned
with the speed of vehicles traveling on Tingdale Avenue south of Benton
Avenue.
Tingdale Avenue is a 30-foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no
sidewalks. A traffic study was conducted on Tingdale Avenue from 03-
30-2010 to 04-06-2010. The average Monday-Friday traffic count was
214 vehicles with an 85th-percentile speed of 24.7 mph. There have been
no reported accidents on this section of Tingdale Avenue since 2001.
There is a "Child at Play" advisory sign on the west side of Tingdale
Avenue at the park.
City policy warrants are not met for an All-Way Stop at this intersection.
Staff recommends the denial of the request for an All-Way Stop at the
intersection of Tingdale Avenue and West 59I Street for lack of
warrants.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 5 of 6
April 7, 2010
G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\Traflic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \10 TSAC & Min \Traffic Safety
Review 04-07-10
SECTION C:
Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
None for Wednesday, April 7, 2010 meeting.
SECTION D:
Other traffic safety issues handled:
1. Twenty-two phone calls requesting information concerning various traffic
safety issues.
2. Request from the Building Department regarding a parking situation on
West 59th Street.
3. Request from the Police Department with traffic concerns on Olinger
Boulevard.
4. Two calls from realtors wanting traffic counts on area streets.
5. Two requests from residents for traffic studies.
Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 6 of 6
April 7, 2010
GAEngineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffiffraffic Advisory Committee\Staff Review Summaries\ 10 TSAC & Min\Traffic Safety
Review 04-07-10
R UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES
About CTS .:Faculty & Staff :.Programs & Institutes
Research
Events:
Events Calendar
Events Education &Careers News
Home > Events > CTS Transportation Research Conference > 2010
Past Events 21st Annual CTS Transportation
Subscribe to News & Research Conference
Events
Recurring Events:
CTS Seminar Series
CTS Research
Conference
Oberstar Forum
CTS Luncheon Series
Career Expo
Freight & Logistics
Symposium
Minnesota Pavement
Conference
Environmental
Stewardship &
Streamlining Workshop
View more photos from the conference
Conference brochure (409 KB PDF)
Abstracts (1.5 MB PDF)
Sessions approved for AICP Credits (43 KB PDF)
Presentations
April 27-28,
2010
St. Paul
RiverCentre
Conference
Materials
-5Arvs4(?k5 4'4.'
One Stop of Directories Sie444archPM
SuL
More search options
Publications Library Services
e Print page El E-mail page
2010 Conference
Presentations and
videos
Photos
Conference brochure (409
KB PDF)
Abstracts (1.5 MB PDF)
Sessions approved for
AICP Credits (43 KB PDF)
Opening Session - How Do National
Transportation Priorities Influence Local
Decisions?
Keynote speaker: Eric C. Peterson, President, American
High Speed Rail Alliance
Panelists: Tim Henkel, Mn/DOT; David Levinson, U of M;
Jim McDonough, Ramsey County Commissioner; Bob
McFarlin, Metropolitan Council
View presentation video (Mediasite Presenter,
Length: 1:24:57; requires Microsoft Silverlight
plug in)
Download presentation slides (533 KB PDF)
More about the opening session
CTS Home
Previous Conferences
View presentations from the
2009 research conference:
2009 conference
presentations
News coverage of previous
years is available in the CTS
Report:
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Luncheon Presentation - Megaregions: A
Framework for Planning in the 21st Century
Dr. Catherine Ross, Director, Center for Quality Growth
and Regional Development, Georgia Institute of
Technology
View presentation video (Mediasite Presenter,
Length: 58:46; requires Microsoft Silverlight
plug in)
Download presentation slides (1.21 MB PDF)
More about the luncheon presentation
1 — What We Know About Keeping Older
Drivers Safe Through Research and Education
Moderator: Lowell Benson
Translating Mixed-Method Research into a TV
Documentary Educating Mature Drivers
Catherine Sullivan, St. Catherine University
Download presentation slides (1.22 MB PDF)
The Effectiveness of Changeable Message Signs and the
Aging Population
Kathleen Harder, College for Design in Health, University
of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (955 KB PDF)
2 — Promoting Alternative Work
Arrangements and Modes
Moderator: Brian Smalkoski, Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc.
Lessons Learned from eWorkPlace, a State-sponsored
Telework Initiative in the Twin Cities
Adeel Lan, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota
Presentation slides not available
Smart Trips Neighborhoods: Encouraging Travel Behavior
Change Through Social Marketing
Laura Baum, St. Paul Smart Trips
Download presentation slides (1 MB PDF)
Transportation Programs at Mayo Clinic
Mary Ann Morris, Mayo Clinic
Download presentation slides (560 KB PDF)
top
3 — High Speed Rail: A National, Regional, and
State Update
Moderator: Dan Krom, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Future of High Speed Passenger Rail in Minnesota and
the Midwest
Dave Christianson, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Download presentation slides (1.1 MB PDF)
US High Speed Rail - The New Holy Grail
Stephanie Eiler, CH2M Hill, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1.84 MB PDF)
2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and
Passenger Rail Plan
Dan Krom, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (632 KB PDF)
4 — Maximizing Our Highways
Moderator: Connie Kozlak, Metropolitan Council
Metropolitan Highway System Investment Study
Carl Ohm, Metropolitan Council
Download presentation slides (1.35 MB PDF)
Congestion and Safety Management in the Twin Cities:
What Does the Future Hold?
Dave Montebello, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1.53 MB PDF)
Innovative Techniques for Delivering the Twin Cities'
Urban Partnership Agreement on Schedule and Under
Budget
Craig Lamothe, Metropolitan Council/ Metro Transit
Download presentation slides (1.13 MB PDF)
(0),
5 — University Research Impacting Pavement
Design
Moderator: Jan Lucke, Center for Transportation Studies,
University of Minnesota
Soil Modulus Testing and Full Depth Reclamation
Joe Labuz, Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.43 MB PDF)
PG Binder Selection in Minnesota
Mihai Marasteanu, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Minnesota and Jim McGraw, Minnesota
Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (911 KB PDF)
Implements of Husbandry
Lev Khazanovich, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.59 MB PDF)
143) top
6 — Driving "Toward Zero Deaths" on Rural
Roads
Moderator: Carla Stueve, SRF Consulting Group
An Update on Strategic Safety Planning for Minnesota
Counties
Howard Preston, CH2M HILL, Inc.
Download presentation slides (4.69 MB PDF)
Summary of Rural Safety Policy ImproVement Index
Project
Keith Knapp, Center for Excellence in Rural Safety,
University of Minnesota
Presentation slides not available
Rural ITS Safety Solution Systems
Tom Sohrweide, SEH Inc.
Download presentation slides (1.91 MB PDF)
7 — The Importance of Public Outreach in
Building Community Trust and Successful
Partnerships
Moderator: Mindy Carlson, Center for Transportation
Studies, University of Minnesota
The Critical Role of Public Outreach and Education in the
Successful Implementation of Pricing Projects
Ferrol Robinson, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (134 KB PDF)
Ombudsman's Office Resolves Issues and Rebuilds Trust
Deb Ledvina, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (511 KB PDF)
Planning Participation Case Study: Successes,
Challenges, and Lessons Learned in Land Use Planning
Efforts Adjacent to an LRT Station
Julie Quinn, Metropolitan Council/Metro Transit
Download presentation slides (2,11 MB PDF)
op
8 — Transportation and Urban Design
Moderator: Mike Marti, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Partnering with Mn/DOT for Complete Streets
Scott Bradley, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (2.45 MB PDF)
NorthStar Commuter Rail Update
Mark Fuhrmann, Metropolitan Council
Download presentation slides (2.37 MB PDF)
Linking Transportation Initiatives with City Design
Options: Re-thinking the University/Cedar Avenue LRT
Station
Ignacio San Martin, School of Architecture, University of
Minnesota
Presentation slides not available
9 — Unique Challenges and Innovative
Solutions in Transportation Planning
Moderator: Biz Colburn
"Rock-On" – A New Life for the Rock Island Swing Bridge
Chris Hiniker, SEH, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1,85 MB PDF)
Roadway Improvement Project Cost Allocation
Craig Vaughn, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1,69 MB PDF)
Bus Staging and Layover Space in Downtown Minneapolis
Charles Carlson, Metro Transit
Download presentation slides (281 MB PDF)
10 — Pavement Tools That You Can Use
Moderator: Jerry Geib, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Unsaturated Soil Mechanics Implementation During
Pavement Construction Quality Assurance
John Siekmeier, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (2.09 MB PDF)
Statewide FWD Data Collection: Project Overview and
Status 2010
David Rettner, American Engineering Testing, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1.49 MB PDF)
Nondestructive Evaluation of Pavements -- Ultrasonic
Tomography
Kyle Hoegh, Department of Civil Engineering, University
of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (4.26 MB PDF)
ti) tort
11 — Metro Area Developments: Detection,
Perception, and Reflection
Moderator: Matt Gjersvik, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Non-Intrusive Technologies Phase III
Erik Minge, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Download presentation slides (2.97MB PDF)
User Perceptions of Fee Lane Concepts in Minnesota
Kenneth Buckeye, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Download presentation slides (1.73 MB PDF)
The Urban Partnership Agreement - Successes and
Lessons Learned So Far
Brian Kary, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (1.92 MB PDF)
top
12 — Getting Around: Creative Solutions for
Rural Communities
Moderator: Jan Ekern, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
A Safer Way Home: The Minnesota SafeRide Resource
Guide
Karen Sprattler, Sprattler Group
Presentation slides not available
Itasca County Area Transportation Study
Frank Douma, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota; Becky LaPlant, Blandin
Foundation
Presentation slides not available
top
13 — Project Scoping and Cost Management in
Action
Moderator: Mike Barnes, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Project Management Peer Review
Jean Wallace, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (1.15 MB PDF)
Minnesota Department of Transportation Change
Management
Mike Ginnaty and Jim Weingartz, Minnesota Department
of Transportation
Download presentation slides (1.68 MB PDF)
Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) on Minnesota
Abby McKenzie, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (298 KB PDF)
14 — Non-Motorized Transportation
Moderator: John S. Adams, University Metropolitan
Consortium, University of Minnesota
Temporal and Spatial Variation in Non-motorized Traffic:
Some Exploratory Analyses
Greg Lindsey and Spencer Agnew, Humphrey Institute of
Public Affairs, University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (924 KB PDF)
Counting Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Shaun Murphy, City of Minneapolis
Download presentation slides (1.29 MB PDF)
Analyzing Bicycle-Motorist Crashes in Minneapolis
Rose Ryan, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (1.84 MB PDF)
15 — Innovations in Pavement Recycling
Moderator: Roger Olson, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Rubblization: A Cost-Effective Option
Jill Thomas, Minnesota Asphalt Pavement Association
Download presentation slides (2.07 MB PDF)
PCC Mix Designs Using Recycled Concrete Pavements
Mary Vancura, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.20 MB PDF)
Recycled Unbound Base Pooled Fund Study
Tuncer Edil, University of Wisconsin
Download presentation slides (2.05 MB PDF)
16 — Keeping the Road Visible
Moderator: Steve Lund, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Rural Road Safety and Maintenance Roadway Safety
Workshops
Renae Kuehl & Carla Stueve, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1.04 MB PDF)
Minnesota Local Agency Pavement Marking Practices
Neal Hawkins and Omar Smadi, Center for Transportation
Research and Education, Iowa State University
Presentation slides not available
Minnesota Toolkit - Information for Local Agencies to
Meet FHWA's Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements
Renae Kuehl, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.; Mark Vizecky,
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (2.44 MB PDF)
Snow Rendering for Interactive Snowplow Simulation -
Improving Driver Ability to Avoid Collisions When
Following a Snowplow
Peter Willemsen, University of Minnesota, Duluth
Presentation slides not available
t-
17 — Innovations in the Communication and
Exchange of Transportation Information
Moderator: Nathan Bowie, Minnesota Department of
Public Safety
A Generational Checklist for Communicating Research
Bob Filipczak, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Presentation slides not available
Collaborative Information Services Between Minnesota
Public Agencies
Sheila Hatchell, Minnesota Department of Transportation
and Arlene Mathison, Center for Transportation Studies,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (621 KB PDF)
Evolution of Social Media Policy for State Agencies
Linda Dahlen, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Presentation slides not available
Innovative Public Outreach
Gina Baas, Center for Transportation Studies, University
of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (478 KB PDF)
top
18 — Support and Sustainability of Innovative
Transportation Funding
Moderator: Adeel Lan, Humphrey Institute of Public
Affairs, University of Minnesota
Should the Fuel Tax be Replaced?
Lee Munnich, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (635 KB PDF)
Sustainable Transportation Funding Options for
Minnesota
Philip Schaffner and Jason Junge, Minnesota Department
of Transportation
Download presentation slides (1.84 MB PDF)
Mn/DOT Quantitative Survey on Public Perceptions of
Mileage-based User Fees
Ken Buckeye, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Download presentation slides (463 KB PDF)
ITS and Privacy: Suggestions for Peaceful Coexistence
Frank Douma, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota; Sara Aue, University of
Minnesota Law School
Download presentation slides (2.03 MB PDF)
C.) top
19 — Transportation's Changing Impact on the
Environment
Moderator: Gavin Poindexter, URS Corporation
Assessing Elements of a Low Carbon Transportation Fuel
Standard for Minnesota
Steve Taff, Department of Applied Economics, University
of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (659 KB PDF)
Travel Demand Management – Planning, Environment,
Pricing, Sustainability
Bill Obermann, UrbanTrans; John Doan, SRF Consulting
Group, Inc.
Download presentation slides (Obermann) (800
KB PDF)
Download presentation slides (Doan) (2.22 MB
PDF)
Addressing Climate Change in Environmental Impact
Analysis
Carissa Schively Slotterback and Garrett Peterson,
Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of
Minnesota
Download presentation slides (1.22 MB PDF)
20 — Bridge Monitoring
Moderator: Romeo Garcia, Federal Highway
Administration
Vibration Inspection Techniques to Rapidly Assess the
Health of Rural Bridges
Brian Brashaw, Natural Resources Research Institute,
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Download presentation slides (2.90 MB PDF)
Long-Term Bridge Performance Program
John Penrod, Federal Highway Administration
Download presentation slides (1.16 MB PDF)
I-35W St. Anthony Falls Bridge Structural Monitoring
Cathy French, Department of Civil Engineering, University
of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.29 MB PDF)
Thermal Monitoring
Art Schultz, Department of Civil Engineering, University
of Minnesota
Presentation slides not available
Wakota Bridge Monitoring and Analysis
Chris Scheevel, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.02 MB PDF)
21 — Strategies for Improving Roadway
Safety
Moderator: Bryant Ficek, TKDA
Improving Transportation Safety Through Accident
Investigation
Vernon Ellingstad, National Transportation Safety Board
Download presentation slides (3.79 MB PDF)
Center for Excellence in Rural Safety Research and
Outreach Activities
Keith Knapp, Center for Excellence in Rural Safety,
University of Minnesota
Presentation slides not available
New Methodologies to Identify Candidates for Safety
Investment
Howard Preston, CH2M Hill, Inc.
Download presentation slides (4,69 MB PDF)
C-.0P
22 - Innovations in the Communication and
Exchange of Transportation Information
Moderator: Gina Baas, Center for Transportation Studies,
University of Minnesota
Panelists: Shannon Tyree, City of St. Paul; Lee Munnich,
Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of
Minnesota; Phil Barnes, Minnesota Department of
Transportation; John S. Adams, University Metropolitan
Consortium, University of Minnesota
Presentation slides not available
g top
23 — Freight and Rail Planning
Moderator: Bill Gardner, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Minnesota Statewide Comprehensive Freight and
Passenger Rail Plan
Dave Christianson, Minnesota Department of
Transportation
Download presentation slides (3.74 MB PDF)
Freight Performance Analysis on 1-94/ 1-90 from the Twin
Cities to Chicago
Chen-Fu Liao, Department of Civil Engineering, University
of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.99 MB PDF)
An Assessment of the Impact of Competition on Rail
Rates for Agricultural Shipments
Kurt Markham, Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Download presentation slides (291 KB PDF)
Northern and Western Minnesota Regional Freight
Studies
Brian Shorten, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Download presentation slides (1.41 MB PDF)
g top
24 — Public Transit in the Twin Cities:
Challenges, Opportunities, and Solutions
Moderator: John Levin, Metro Transit
Mining Bus Location, Passenger Count and Fare Collection
Database for Intelligent Transit Applications
Chen-Fu Liao, Minnesota Traffic Observatory; Henry Liu,
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (2.16 MB PDF)
Transit Cost-Effectiveness: The C.E.I. Demystified
Steve Wilson, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Presentation slides not available
Impacts of the Hiawatha Light Rail Line on Commercial
and Industrial Property Values in Minneapolis
Jason Cao, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (1.36 MB PDF)
Can LRT Improve the Job Access of the Working Poor?
Yingling Fan, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,
University of Minnesota
Download presentation slides (1.34 MB PDF)
25 — Storm Water Management
Moderator: Jill Thomas, Minnesota Asphalt Pavement
Association
Porous Pavement for Storm Water Management
Clifton Aichinger, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed
District
Download presentation slides (2.37 MB PDF)
SAFL Baffle Improves Standard Sump as a Stormwater
Treatment BMP
Adam Howard, St. Anthony Falls Laboratory
Presentation slides not available
Shingle Creek Porous Pavement Paired Intersection Study
Ed Matthiesen, Wenck Associates, Inc.
Download presentation slides (4.96 MB PDF)
(ci) 2010 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Trouble seeing the text? I Contact U of M I Privacy
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Last modified on Thursday, May 06, 2010